UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K10-K/A
(Amendment No. 1)
☒
xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162023
OR
☐
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to         
Commission file number 001-35896
Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Maryland46-0687599
Maryland46-0687599
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
53 Forest Avenue, Old Greenwich, Connecticut 06870
(Address of Principal Executive Office)
53 Forest Avenue
Old Greenwich, Connecticut 06870
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(203) 698-1200
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each ClassTrading Symbol(s)Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Title of each className of each exchange on which registered
Common Shares of Beneficial Interest, $0.01 par value per shareEARNThe New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨☐    No  x☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes  ¨☐   No  x☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x☒    No  ¨☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x☒    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 232.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer¨☐Accelerated Filerx☐
Non-Accelerated Filer¨☒Smaller Reporting Company¨☒
Emerging Growth Company☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨ ☐   No  x☒
As of June 30, 2016,2023, the last business day of the Registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the registrant'sRegistrant's common shares held by non-affiliates was $80,555,138$100,812,109 based on the closing price as reported by the New York Stock Exchange on that date.
Number of the registrant'sRegistrant's common shares outstanding as of April 5, 2024: 19,819,610
Documents incorporated by reference: None


ELLINGTON RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE REIT
Item No.Form 10-K/A Report Page
PART III
10.Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
5
11.Executive Compensation
13
12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters
19
13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
21
14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services
24
PART IV
15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
25


EXPLANATORY NOTE
This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (the "Amendment") amends our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on March 10, 2017: 9,130,897
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions12, 2024 (the "Original Filing"). We are filing this Amendment pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K to include information required by Part III of Form 10-K that we did not include in the registrant'sOriginal Filing, as we do not intend to file a definitive Proxy Statement with respect to its 2017 Annual Meetingproxy statement for an annual meeting of Shareholders to be filed not later thanshareholders within 120 days after the end of the registrant'sour fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.
This Amendment also amends Part IV, Item 15 to include the currently dated certifications from the Company's principal executive officer and principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which are incorporated by reference into Part III hereofattached hereto. Except as noted therein.described above and as described in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 1, 2024 (the "April 8-K"), no other changes have been made to the Original Filing. The Original Filing continues to speak as of its filing date and we have not updated the disclosures contained therein to reflect any events which occurred at a date subsequent to the filing date of the Original Filing. Terms used but not defined herein are as defined in the Original Filing.


ELLINGTON RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE REIT
INDEX
Item No. Form 10-K Report Page
 PART I 
1.
Business
3
1A.
Risk Factors
14
1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
42
2.
Properties
42
3.
Legal Proceedings
42
4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
42
 Part II 
5.
Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
43
6.
Selected Financial Data
45
7.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Resulted of Operations
47
7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
70
8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
73
9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
103
9A.
Controls and Procedures
103
 Part III 
10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
106
11.
Executive Compensation
106
12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters
106
13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
106
14.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
106
 Part IV 
15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
107
16.Form 10-K Summary
109





PART I
Item 1. Business
Except whereUnless otherwise indicated or unless the context suggestsrequires otherwise, "EARN,all references in this Amendment to the "Company," "we," "us," andor "our" refer to Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT and its consolidated subsidiaries, including Ellington Residential Mortgage LP, our operating partnership subsidiary, which we refer to as our "Operating Partnership." We hold all of our assets and conduct all of our operations through our Operating Partnership.Our "Manager" refers to Ellington Residential Mortgage Management LLC, our external manager, and "Ellington""EMG" refers to Ellington Management Group, L.L.C. and its affiliated investment advisory firms, including our Manager. In certain instances, references to our Manager and services to be provided to us by our Manager may also include services provided by EllingtonEMG and its other affiliates from time to time. In certain instances, references to
4

PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Board of Trustees
Our business is managed through the oversight and direction of our Board of Trustees (the "Board"), which has established investment guidelines for our Manager and services to be provided to us byfollow in its day-to-day management of our business. Our Manager may also include services provided by Ellington and its other affiliates from time to time. References to "Blackstone" mean The Blackstone Group LP. The "Blackstone Funds" means the group of funds that are managed byis an affiliate of Blackstone and that helped form, and haveEMG, a substantial investment in, our company. 
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
When used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the "SEC," or in press releases or other written or oral communications, statements which are not historical in nature, including those containing words such as "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "project," "plan," "continue," "intend," "should," "would," "could," "goal," "objective," "will," "may," "seek," or similar expressions, are intended to identify "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the "Securities Act," and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the "Exchange Act," and, as such, may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions.
Forward-looking statements are based on our beliefs, assumptions, and expectations of our future performance, taking into account all information currently available to us. These beliefs, assumptions, and expectations are subject to risks and uncertainties and can change as a result of many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to us. If a change occurs, our business, financial condition, liquidity, and results of operations may vary materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements. The following factors are examples of those that could cause actual results to vary from our forward-looking statements: changes in interest rates and the market value of our securities; our use of and dependence on leverage; future changes with respect to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and related events, including the lack of certainty as to the future roles of these entities and the U.S. Government in the mortgage market and changes to legislation and regulations affecting these entities; market volatility; changes in the prepayment rates on the mortgage loans underlying the securities we own and intend to acquire; changes in rates of default and/or recovery rates on our non-Agency assets; our ability to borrow to finance our assets; changes in government regulations affecting our business; our ability to maintain our exclusion from registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the "Investment Company Act"; and risks associated with investing in real estate assets, including changes in business conditions and the general economy. These and other risks, uncertainties and factors, including the risk factors described under Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected or implied in any forward-looking statements we make. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. New risks and uncertainties arise over time, and it is not possible to predict those events or how they may affect us. Except as required by law, we are not obligated to, and do not intend to, update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Our Company
Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT is a Maryland real estate investment trust formed in August 2012 that specializes in acquiring, investing in, and managing residential mortgage- and real estate-related assets. Our primary objective is to generate attractive current yields and risk-adjusted total returns for our shareholders by making investments that we believe compensate us appropriately for the risks associated with them. We seek to attain this objective by constructing and actively managing a portfolio comprised primarily of residential mortgage-backed securities, or "RMBS," for which the principal and interest payments are guaranteed by a U.S. government agency or a U.S. government-sponsored entity, or "Agency RMBS," and, to a lesser extent, RMBS backed by prime jumbo, Alternative A-paper, or "Alt-A," manufactured housing, and subprime residential mortgage loans, or "non-Agency RMBS." We also may opportunistically acquire other types of residential mortgage- and real estate-related asset classes, such as residential mortgage loans and mortgage servicing rights, or "MSRs." We believe that being able to combine Agency RMBS with non-Agency RMBS and other residential mortgage- and real estate-related asset classes enables us to balance a range of mortgage-related risks.
We were formed through an initial strategic venture among affiliates of Ellington, anprivate investment management firm and registered investment adviser with a 22-year history of investingadvisor that specializes in a broad spectrum of mortgage-backed securities, or "MBS,"fixed income strategies, and related derivatives, and the Blackstone Funds. As of December 31, 2016, the Blackstone Funds owned approximately 29%

of our outstanding common shares. We have elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or "REIT," for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We intend to maintain our exclusion from registration under the Investment Company Act.
Our Manager and Ellington
We are externally managed and advised by our Manager, an affiliate of Ellington, pursuant to a management agreement. Our Manager was formed solely to serve as our manager and does not have any other clients. In addition, our Manager does not have any employees of its own and instead relies on the employees of Ellington to perform its obligations to us.
The members of our management team are Michael Vranos, founder and Chief Executive Officer of Ellington, who serves as our Co-Chief Investment Officer and as a member of our Board of Trustees; Laurence Penn, Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer of Ellington, who serves as our President and Chief Executive Officer and as a member of our Board of Trustees; Mark Tecotzky, a Managing Director of Ellington, who serves as our Co-Chief Investment Officer; Lisa Mumford, who serves as our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer; Daniel Margolis, General Counsel of Ellington, who serves as our General Counsel; and Jason Frank, Associate General Counsel of Ellington, who serves as our Secretary. Each of these individuals is an officer of our Manager.
Our Manager is responsible for administering our business activities and day-to-day operationsoperations. Our Board is currently comprised of six trustees. The trustees are informed about our business at meetings of our Board and pursuantits committees and through supplemental reports and communications. Our independent trustees meet regularly in executive sessions without the presence of our corporate officers.
Our Board has established three standing committees that are comprised solely of independent trustees, the principal functions of which are briefly described below. Matters put to a services agreement betweenvote at any one of our Manager and Ellington, reliesthree committees must be approved by a majority of the trustees on the resourcescommittee who are present at a meeting at which there is a quorum or by unanimous written consent of Ellington to support our operations. Ellington has well-established portfolio management resourcesthe trustees on that committee.
The following sets forth the names, ages, and biographical information for each member of the Board.
Name and Position
With Our Company		AgeBackground Summary
Robert B. Allardice, III
Chairman of the Board
77
Mr. Allardice has served as a member of our Board since May 2013 and was appointed as Chairman of the Board in January 2021 and is Chairman of the Audit Committee. Mr. Allardice also served as a director, member of the audit committee, and chairman of the finance, investment and risk management committee of The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (NYSE: HIG), from September 2008 through June 2023. Mr. Allardice served as a director of GasLog Partners LP (NYSE: GLOP) from October 2014 to January 2021. Mr. Allardice retired in 1999 from his position as regional chief executive officer of Deutsche Bank Americas Holding Corporation, North and South America, or "DBAHC." Prior to joining Deutsche Bank, Mr. Allardice was a consultant to Smith Barney. Prior to consulting to Smith Barney, Mr. Allardice spent nearly 20 years in positions of increasing responsibility at Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. He founded the company's Merger Arbitrage Department and later became Chief Operating Officer of the Equity Department. Mr. Allardice has served as a board member of Bankers Trust Company, Carlyle Capital Corporation Ltd., DBAHC and Worldwide Excellerated Leasing Limited. Mr. Allardice earned a B.A., cum laude, from Yale University and an MBA from Harvard University, where he graduated as a George F. Baker Scholar.
Our Board believes that Mr. Allardice's more than 35 years of experience in the financial services industry, especially his experience as a senior executive officer engaged in strategic planning, risk management, talent development, financial management and financial reporting, and his service on the audit committee of an NYSE-listed company gives him the qualifications and skills to serve as a trustee of our Company.
Michael W. Vranos Co-Chief Investment Officer & Trustee
62
Mr. Vranos has been our Co-Chief Investment Officer since October 2012 and a member of our Board since our inception in 2012. Mr. Vranos is also the Chief Executive Officer and President of our Manager. Mr. Vranos also serves as Co-Chief Investment Officer of Ellington Financial Inc. (NYSE: EFC) ("EFC") and was a director of EFC from its inception in 2007 until August 2018. Mr. Vranos is also the founder and Chief Executive Officer of EMG, which he founded in December of 1994 to capitalize on distressed conditions in the mortgage-backed securities, or "MBS," derivatives market. Until December 1994, he was the Senior Managing Director of Kidder Peabody, in charge of residential mortgage-backed securities, or "RMBS," trading. Mr. Vranos graduated magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa with a B.A. in Mathematics from Harvard University.
Our Board believes that Mr. Vranos' operational experience as Co-Chief Investment Officer of our Company, trading and market expertise and, in particular, his extensive experience in the asset-backed securities business, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a trustee of our Company.
5

Name and Position
With Our Company		AgeBackground Summary
Laurence E. Penn
Chief Executive Officer, President & Trustee
62
Mr. Penn has been our Chief Executive Officer and President since October 2012 and has served as a member of our Board since our inception in 2012. Mr. Penn is also a Vice Chairman of EMG, where he helps oversee many functions of the firm. Mr. Penn is also the Executive Vice President of our Manager and serves on EMG's Investment and Risk Management Committee. Mr. Penn also serves as Chief Executive Officer, President, and a member of the Board of Directors of EFC. Mr. Penn has also served as a Trustee of Ellington Income Opportunities Fund, a closed-end management investment company, since October 2018. In EMG's earlier years, Mr. Penn was the senior portfolio manager primarily responsible for investments in Agency RMBS. Prior to joining EMG in 1995 shortly after its inception, Mr. Penn was at Lehman Brothers, where he was a Managing Director and co-head of CMO origination and trading, and where he specialized in the trading of CMO derivatives. Prior to trading CMOs and CMO derivatives, Mr. Penn was in charge of Lehman Brothers' structured transaction modeling group from 1987 to 1990, where he was responsible for the structuring, modeling and computer system design for MBS and ABS, and where he was the co-creator (with Jonathan Amsterdam) of "BondTalk," the first high-level programming language specifically designed to model CMOs. Mr. Penn began his career at Lehman Brothers in 1984, after receiving a Master of Advanced Study in Mathematics from Cambridge University, where he studied as both a National Science Foundation Fellow and Winston Churchill Scholar. Mr. Penn graduated summa cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa with a B.A. in Mathematics from Harvard University. Mr. Penn was one of five winners nationwide in the 1980 Putnam collegiate mathematics problem-solving competition, and represented the United States in the 21st International Mathematics Olympiad held in London, England.
Our Board believes that Mr. Penn's operational experience as President and Chief Executive Officer of our Company, risk management and trading expertise and, in particular, his extensive experience in the mortgage securities business, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a trustee of our Company.
Ronald I. Simon, Ph.D.Trustee
85
Dr. Simon is a private investor and financial consultant to businesses. Dr. Simon has served as a member of our Board since May 2013, and is Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Dr. Simon has also served as a member of the Board of Directors of EFC since 2007 and was appointed as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chairman of the Audit Committee of EFC in January 2021. From March 2003 through February 2006, when it was acquired by Wachovia Corp., Dr. Simon was a director of WFS Financial, Inc., a publicly-traded financial services company specializing in automobile finance. From 1995 through 2002, Dr. Simon was a director of SoftNet Systems, Inc. ("SoftNet"), during 2001, he served as Acting Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer for SoftNet, Inc. From 2002 through August 2016 he was a director of its successor company, American Independence Corp. ("AIC"), a holding company engaged principally in the health insurance and reinsurance business. AIC was acquired by Independence Holdings Company ("IHC"), a holding company principally engaged in the disability, health insurance and pet insurance business, in August 2016, and he served as a director of IHC from August 2016 to February 2022, and as a member of the Audit Committee from November 2017 to February 2022. Dr. Simon earned a B.A. from Harvard University, an M.A. from Columbia University, and a Ph.D. from Columbia University Graduate School of Business.
Our Board believes that Dr. Simon's expertise in finance and his extensive service in senior officer positions and directorships of public companies in a variety of industries give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a trustee of our Company.
6

Name and Position
With Our Company		AgeBackground Summary
David J. Miller
Trustee
64
Mr. Miller is currently a private investor and has served as a member of our Board since May 2013. He also serves on several private company boards, including Everstory Inc., J.G. Wentworth, and Prima Insurance. Mr. Miller also previously served as a member of the boards of several other companies, including Figure Acquisition Corp., where he served as the Chair of the Audit Committee from February 2021 until December 2022, StoneMor Inc. (where, from July 2019 to November 2022 when it was a public company, he served as the Chairman of the Compensation, Nominations & Governance Committee and as a member of the Audit Committee), and Lombard International Assurance, where he served on the board from July 2015 until his resignation in December 2023. Mr. Miller previously served as the Chief Executive Officer of JGWPT Holdings, LLC, or its predecessor J.G. Wentworth, LLC from January 2009 until July 2014. Prior to joining J.G. Wentworth, LLC, in January 2009, Mr. Miller held various positions including: Executive Vice-President responsible for Ace Group's International Accident and Health Insurance Business, President and Chief Executive Officer of Kemper Auto and Home Insurance, and Chief Operating Officer of Providian Direct Insurance. Mr. Miller began his insurance career with Progressive Insurance where he held various positions over his seven-year tenure. Mr. Miller has a BSEE in electrical engineering from Duke University and an MBA in Finance from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. In November 2021, Mr. Miller was elected to serve a four-year term on the board of supervisors of Tredyffrin Township. He was previously a member of the New York Stock Exchange.
Our Board believes that Mr. Miller's financial and management expertise and his valuable experience gained from his tenure as an executive and as a director of other companies in the financial services industry gives him the qualifications and skills to serve as a trustee of our Company.
Mary McBride
Trustee
68
Ms. McBride has served as a member of our Board since March 2021. Ms. McBride was President of CoBank, ACB ("CoBank"), a cooperative bank and member of the Farm Credit System serving vital industries across rural America, from 2013 to 2016. Ms. McBride joined CoBank in 1993 and served as Vice President, Loan Policy & Syndications; Senior Vice President and Manager, Corporate Finance Division; Senior Vice President and Manager, Operations Division; Executive Vice President, Communications and Energy Banking Group; and Chief Operating Officer before being appointed Chief Banking Officer in 2010. Ms. McBride served as a Director of CatchMark Timber Trust, Inc., a real estate company that invests in timberlands, from February 2018 until September 2022, and has served as a Director of Intrepid Potash Inc., a diversified minerals company, since May 2020. Before joining CoBank, Ms. McBride was Senior Vice President and Manager, Commercial Lending at First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A., and prior to that served as Assistant Vice President, Energy & Utilities at First National Bank of Boston. Ms. McBride served on the Biomass Technical Advisory and Research Committee of the U.S. Departments of Energy and Agriculture from 2006 to 2012. She also previously served as Chair of Mile High United Way. Ms. McBride received a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from Wellesley College, a Master of Science in European Studies from the London School of Economics and a Master of Science in Applied Economics and International Management and Finance from the Sloan School of Management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Our Board believes that Ms. McBride's experience as president of CoBank, together with her experience serving as a board member for two other publicly traded companies, give her the qualifications and skills to serve as a trustee of our Company.
Board Refreshment
Our Board currently consists of six trustees who are elected annually.
Information Regarding Our Board and Its Committees
Trustees are expected to attend all of our targeted asset classesregular and anspecial meetings of the Board and all meetings of the committees on which they serve. In 2023, there were fourteen meetings of the Board, and each of the current trustees attended at least 75% of the meetings of both the Board and committees on which he or she served.
We have a policy that trustees attend our annual meetings of shareholders. Mr. Miller, Mr. Allardice, Dr. Simon, Mr. Vranos, Mr. Penn, and Ms. McBride attended the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
7

Our Board has established infrastructure supporting those resources. Throughthree standing committees of the Board: Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance. The charter for each committee, more fully describing the responsibilities of each committee, can be found on our relationship withwebsite at www.earnreit.com under the "For Investors—Corporate Governance" section. Pursuant to their charters, each of these committees is comprised solely of independent trustees. The table below indicates our Manager, we benefit from Ellington's highly analytical investment processes, broad-based deal flow, extensive relationshipscurrent committee membership and the number of times each committee met in the financial community, financial and capital structuring skills, investment surveillance capabilities, and operational expertise. Ellington's analytic approach2023.
Trustee NameAudit
Committee		Compensation
Committee		Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee
Robert B. Allardice, IIIChairMemberMember
David J. MillerMemberChairMember
Mary McBrideMemberMemberMember
Ronald I. Simon, Ph.D.MemberMemberChair
Number of Meetings in 2023675
Our committees make recommendations to the investment process involves collectionBoard as appropriate and regularly report on their activities to the entire Board.
Audit Committee
Pursuant to its charter, our Audit Committee assists the Board in overseeing (1) the integrity of substantial amountsour financial statements; (2) our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (3) the qualifications and independence of data regarding historicalour independent auditors; and (4) the performance of RMBS collateralour independent auditors and RMBS market transactions. Ellington analyzes this data to identify possible relationships and trends and develops financial models used to support our investment and risk management process. In addition, throughout Ellington's 22-year historyinternal audit function.
Each member of investing in RMBS and related derivatives, it has developed strong relationships with a wide rangethe Audit Committee meets the independence requirements of dealers and other market participants that provide Ellington access to a broad range of trading opportunities and market information. As a result, Ellington provides us with access to a wide variety of asset acquisition and disposition opportunities and information that assist us in making asset management decisions across our targeted asset classes, which we believe provides us with a significant competitive advantage. We also benefit from Ellington's finance, accounting, operational, legal, compliance, and administrative functions.
As of December 31, 2016, Ellington employed over 160 employees and had assets under management of approximately $5.9 billion, of which (i) approximately $4.4 billion consisted of our company, as well as Ellington Financial LLC, a specialty finance company listed on the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE") and the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") rules and regulations, and each is financially literate. Our Board has determined that each of Mr. Allardice, the chairman of our Audit Committee, Ms. McBride, Mr. Miller and Dr. Simon is an "audit committee financial expert" as that term is defined by the SEC and that each satisfies the financial expertise requirements of the NYSE.
Compensation Committee
Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee's principal functions are to assist the Board in discharging its responsibilities relating to (1) compensation of our trustees and officers; (2) review, approval, and administration of compensation plans and programs and other benefit plans for our trustees, officers, employees, and consultants and other third parties who perform services for us; and (3) compensation of our Manager. The Compensation Committee may form and delegate authority to subcommittees comprised entirely of independent trustees or "NYSE,"its chair when appropriate.
Our Board has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee meets the independence requirements of the NYSE that apply to compensation committee members.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Pursuant to its charter, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying, recruiting, considering and recommending to our Board qualified candidates for election as trustees and recommending a slate of nominees for election as trustees at our annual meetings of shareholders. It also reviews the background and qualifications of individuals being considered as trustee candidates pursuant to attributes and criteria established by the committee and the Board from time to time. It reviews and makes recommendations on matters involving general operation of our Board and our corporate governance, and annually recommends to our Board nominees for each committee of the Board. In addition, the committee annually facilitates the assessment of our Board's performance as a whole and of the individual trustees and reports thereon to the Board. The committee is responsible for reviewing and approving in advance any related party transactions, other than related party transactions which have been pre-approved pursuant to pre-approval guidelines to address specific categories of transactions, which the committee reviews, evaluates and updates, as appropriate, from time to time.
In selecting candidates to recommend to our Board as trustee nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee looks at a number of attributes and criteria, including experience, skills, expertise, diversity of experience, personal and professional integrity, character, business judgment, time availability in light of other commitments, dedication, conflicts of interest and such other relevant factors that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers appropriate in the context of the needs of the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee views diversity as a positive factor in considering trustee candidates, but it does not have a formal policy about diversity of board members, and neither includes nor excludes any candidate from consideration solely based on the candidate’s diversity traits. In assessing the needs of the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and our Board review and consider from time to time the requisite skills and characteristics of individual trustees as well as the composition of the Board as a whole.
8

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates recommended by shareholders for service on our Board and such proposed nominees will be considered and evaluated under the ticker "EFC,"same criteria as described above. Any recommendation submitted to the Company should be in writing and should include any supporting material the shareholder considers appropriate in support of that recommendation, but must include all information relating to such proposed nominee that would be required to be disclosed in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the election of the proposed nominee as a trustee in an election contest (even if an election contest is not involved), or would otherwise be required in connection with such solicitation, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A (or any successor provision), a written statement certifying, among other things, that the proposed nominee, will serve as a trustee if elected and must otherwise comply with the requirements under our bylaws for shareholders to propose nominees. Shareholders wishing to propose a candidate for consideration may do so by submitting the above information addressed to Attention: Secretary, Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT, 53 Forest Avenue, Old Greenwich, Connecticut 06870. All recommendations for trustee nominations received by the Secretary that satisfy our bylaws requirements relating to such trustee nominations will be presented to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for its consideration. Shareholders also must satisfy the notification, timeliness, consent, and information requirements set forth in our bylaws.
Board Leadership Structure
While the roles are currently separated, our Board has not established a fixed policy regarding the separation of the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. Instead, the Board believes this determination is part of the succession planning process and should be considered upon the appointment or re-appointment of a Chief Executive Officer. The Board believes that the current separation of the role of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board is appropriate because it allows our Chief Executive Officer to focus on running our business, while allowing the Chairman of the Board to lead the Board in its fundamental role of providing advice to and independent oversight of management.
Board Oversight of Risk
Our Board believes an effective risk management system will (1) timely identify the material risks that we face; (2) communicate necessary information with respect to material risks to our principal executive officer or principal financial officer and officers of our Manager and, as appropriate, to our Board or relevant committee thereof; (3) implement appropriate and responsive risk management strategies consistent with our risk profile; and (4) integrate risk management into management and our Board's decision-making.
EMG has an Investment and Risk Management Committee that advises and consults with our senior management team with respect to, among other things, our investment policies, portfolio holdings, financing and hedging strategies, and investment guidelines. The members of the Investment and Risk Management Committee include two of our trustees, Mr. Vranos and Mr. Penn, as well as one of our officers, Mark Tecotzky. The Audit Committee has been designated by our Board to take the lead in overseeing risk management. As part of its oversight function, the Audit Committee receives briefings provided by members of the Investment and Risk Management Committee, officers of our Manager and various hedge fundsadvisors to our Company regarding the adequacy of our risk management processes. The Audit Committee also regularly receives briefings from our internal auditor.
In addition, the Audit Committee receives regular reports from management on cybersecurity and related risks. Our Board's oversight of cybersecurity risk management is supported by the Audit Committee, which regularly interacts with our management team and other alternative investment vehiclesprofessionals who are responsible for assessing and managing material risks from cybersecurity threats at our Company. We also regularly engage third parties to perform assessments of our cybersecurity posture, including penetration testing, user access control reviews and independent reviews of our information security control environment, and operating effectiveness. The results of such assessments, tests and reviews are reported to the Audit Committee and our Board, and we adjust our cybersecurity policies, standards, processes and practices as necessary based on the information provided by these assessments, tests and reviews, including the implementation of new software and technologies.
Our Board also encourages our officers and the officers of our Manager to promote a corporate culture that employ financial leverage,incorporates risk management into our corporate strategy and (ii) approximately $1.5 billion consistedday-to-day business operations and continually works with our officers, the officers of accountsour Manager and our advisors to assess and analyze the most likely areas of future risk for our Company. In addition, our Compensation Committee has reviewed its compensation policies and practices with respect to certain employees of the Manager who are dedicated or partially dedicated to providing services to the Company taking into consideration risk management practices and risk-taking incentives. Following such review, we determined that our compensation policies and practices for such employees do not employ financial leverage.create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.
9

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Our StrategyBoard has established a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our officers and trustees and to our Manager's and certain of its affiliates' officers, trustees and employees when such individuals are acting for or on our behalf. Among other matters, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:
•honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;
•compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules, and regulations;
•prompt internal reporting of violations of the code to appropriate persons identified in the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; and
•accountability for adherence to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
EMG also has its own Code of Ethics with which employees of EMG and our Manager, including officers of our Company, must also comply. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is intended to complement EMG's Code of Ethics. To the extent there is any conflict between our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and EMG's Code of Ethics with respect to the officers of our Company and the officers, employees, and other personnel of EMG and our Manager who perform services for or on our behalf, the provisions of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics will control, except to the extent that the provisions of EMG's Code of Ethics are more restrictive, in which case the provisions of EMG's Code of Ethics will control. Any waiver of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics of our executive officers or trustees may be made only by our Board or one of its committees.
We intend to capitalizesatisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K relating to amendments to or waivers from any provision of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions and that relates to any element of the code of ethics definition enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K by posting such information on current market opportunitiesour website at www.earnreit.com under the "For Investors—Corporate Governance" section of the website.
Clawback Policy
Our Board adopted the Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT Clawback Policy (the “Clawback Policy”) effective as of November 2, 2023, which supersedes and replaces all prior and contemporaneous policies of the Company regarding incentive compensation recoupment. In the event that the Company is required to prepare a financial restatement, the Compensation Committee shall, to the extent practicable, recoup all incentive-based compensation calculated on a pre-tax basis received after October 2, 2023, by utilizinga person (i) after beginning service as an opportunistic strategyexecutive officer; (ii) who served as an executive officer at any time during the performance period for that incentive-based compensation; (iii) while the Company had a class of securities listed on a national securities exchange or national securities association; and (iv) during the applicable period, that exceeded the amount of incentive-based compensation that otherwise would have been received had the amount been determined based on the Financial Reporting Measures (as defined in the Clawback Policy), as reflected in the restatement.
Communications with Our Board
Our Board has established a process for shareholders and other interested parties to communicate with the members of our Board, any trustee (including the Chairman of the Board), non-management members of the Board as a group or any committee. To do so, a shareholder or other interested party may send a letter addressed to Attention: Secretary, Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT, 53 Forest Avenue, Old Greenwich, Connecticut 06870. The Secretary will forward all such communications to our trustees.
Availability of Our Corporate Governance Materials
Shareholders may view our corporate governance materials, including the written charters of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, our Corporate Governance Guidelines and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, on our website at www.earnreit.com under the "For Investors—Corporate Governance" section of the website. A copy of any of these documents will be provided free of charge to any shareholder upon request by writing to Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT, 53 Forest Avenue, Old Greenwich, Connecticut 06870, Attention: Secretary. Information at or connected to our website is not and should not be considered a part of this Amendment or the Original Filing.
Corporate Responsibility
EMG is committed to corporate responsibility. We recognize the importance of environmental, social and governance ("ESG") policies, and we believe will enable usthat the implementation of ESG policies benefits EMG's employees, supports long-term stockholder performance, and makes a positive impact on the environment and society as a whole. EMG has a standing ESG
10

Committee to generate attractive current yields and risk-adjusted total returns for our shareholders. In particular, our strategy consists of:
utilizing an investment model that focuses on security selection and allocates capital to assets that balance a range of mortgage-related risks;
constructing and actively managing a hybrid investment portfolio comprised primarily of Agency RMBS and, to a lesser extent, non-Agency RMBS, designed to:
take advantage of opportunities in the Agency RMBS market by acquiring Agency RMBS on a leveraged basis; and
take advantage of opportunities in the non-Agency residential mortgage market by purchasing investment grade and non-investment grade non-Agency RMBS, including senior and subordinated securities;
opportunistically acquiring and managing other mortgage- and real estate-related assets, such as MSRs and residential mortgage loans, that we would hold for appreciation and/or current income; and
opportunistically mitigating our interest rate and prepayment risk and, to a lesser extent, credit risk, by usingaddress a variety of hedging instruments.issues, including EMG's impact on the environment, increasing the diversity of EMG's workforce, employee engagement, and community involvement. We assess the interests of all stakeholders—stockholders, employees, service providers, lenders, and the surrounding community—when determining the long-term goals of our business. In doing so, we prioritize strong ESG practices, active stockholder engagement, a commitment to significant disclosure and transparency, including an established dividend policy, and supportive employment practices.
Environmental
As an investment firm with approximately 170 employees, the vast majority of whom work out of EMG's offices in Old Greenwich, CT and New York, NY, we believe that EMG's corporate footprint and business operations have a relatively modest impact on the environment. Nevertheless, we believe in promoting a sustainable environment by using resources as efficiently and responsibly as practicable. Our commitment to these principles is reflected in our daily activities in a variety of ways:
•EMG's offices are conveniently located near mass transportation, which enables our employees to commute efficiently. Further, EMG provides financial incentives to employees who use public transportation.
•To reduce energy usage, EMG uses Energy Star® certified desktops, monitors, and printers, and utilizes motion sensor lighting and cooling to reduce energy usage in non-peak hours.
•To reduce waste and promote a cleaner environment, EMG uses green cleaning supplies and kitchen products; recycles electronics, ink cartridges, and packaging; provides recycling containers to employees; and uses water coolers.
•EMG also attempts to reduce the number of single use cups and plastic water bottles in its offices by providing reusable bottles and cups.
Social
Human Capital
Behind our success is EMG's most notable asset, its employees. To foster the health and well-being of EMG's employees and their families, full-time employees have access to robust health and wellness programs. EMG employee benefits include:
•EMG bears the majority of the cost of medical, prescription, dental, life, and a variety of long- and short-term disability insurance policies;
•Paid time off;
•Paid parental leave;
•Gym subsidies and a monthly payout for tracking and reporting daily steps;
•In-office flu shot clinics; and
•401(k) plan.
To attract and retain talent, EMG supports the professional development of its employees with a variety of opportunities for personal growth through training, education support, mentorship programs, and internships, including:
•Professional training includes a lunch and learn series and reimbursement for continuing professional education;
•All employees participate in mid-year and/or annual performance reviews; and
•Approximately 15% of open positions were filled internally in 2023; the average tenure of EMG employees is over seven years.
EMG also supports professional development through affinity groups, such as a women’s networking group.
EMG is committed to enhancing gender, racial, and ethnic diversity throughout the organization, as stated in its Diversity and Inclusion Policy, and has engaged a women-owned recruiting firm focused exclusively on women and minority recruiting on college campuses.
Charitable Activity
EMG and senior members of management contribute to numerous charitable causes. EMG also supports employee charitable contributions with a matching gift program, hosting food drives, and other community events.
Governance
We are committed to strong alignment with our stakeholders in governance, ethics, and compliance. We operate under a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and all employees are required to undertake compliance training annually. We have an established Whistleblower Policy and hotline to encourage transparency and accountability.
11

Our strategy is adaptabletrustees and officers and EMG personnel are not permitted to changing market environments, subject to compliance with the income and other tests that will allow us to maintain our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes and to maintain our exclusion from registration as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. As a result, although we intend to focus on the

acquisition and management primarily of Agency RMBS, and to a lesser extent, non-Agency RMBS, residential mortgage loans, and MSRs, our acquisition and management decisions will depend on prevailing market conditions and our targeted asset classes may vary over timeengage in response to market conditions. To the extent that we acquire MSRs, it may be necessary to hold such assets through a taxable REIT subsidiary, or "TRS." The income from such assets held through a TRS will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax. Our Manager is authorized to follow very broad investment guidelines and, as a result, we cannot predict our portfolio composition. We may change our strategy and policies without a voteshort sales of our shareholders. Moreover, althoughsecurities or derivative transactions involving our securities designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of our securities.
EMG incorporates ESG values in its risk management function by, among other things, providing transparency about risk exposures to stakeholders, including our trustees, investors, senior management, and portfolio managers. EMG also fosters dialogue about emerging sources of risk and assumptions driving investment decisions.
Executive Officers
The following sets forth the names, ages, and biographical information for the Company's executive officers.
Name and Position
With Our Company		AgeBackground Summary
Laurence E. Penn
Chief Executive Officer, President & Trustee
62See "–Board of Trustees."
Michael W. Vranos
Co-Chief Investment Officer & Trustee
62See "–Board of Trustees."
Mark Tecotzky
Co-Chief Investment Officer
62Mr. Tecotzky has been our Co-Chief Investment Officer since October 2012 and the Co-Chief Investment Officer of EFC since March 2008. Mr. Tecotzky is also Vice Chairman—Co-Head of Credit Strategies of EMG, and head portfolio manager for all MBS/ABS credit. Prior to joining EMG in July 2006, Mr. Tecotzky was the senior trader in the mortgage department at Credit Suisse. He developed and launched several of its securitization vehicles, including hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages, or "ARMs," and second liens, and subsequently ran its hybrid ARM business, including conduit pricing, servicing sales, monthly securitization, trading of Agency/non-Agency hybrids of all ratings categories and managing and hedging the residual portfolio. Prior to joining Credit Suisse, Mr. Tecotzky worked with Mr. Vranos and many of the other EMG principals at Kidder Peabody, and traded Agency and non-Agency pass-throughs and structured CMOs as a Managing Director. Mr. Tecotzky holds a B.S. from Yale University, and received a National Science Foundation fellowship to study at MIT.
Christopher Smernoff
Chief Financial Officer
47Mr. Smernoff joined EMG in January 2007 and has served as our Chief Financial Officer since April 2018. Mr. Smernoff also served as our Controller from April 2013 to April 2018. Mr. Smernoff is responsible for managing all aspects of our finance and accounting operations. In addition, Mr. Smernoff has served as the Chief Accounting Officer of EFC since April 2018. Prior to that Mr. Smernoff served as EFC's Controller since February 2010. From January 2007 through February 2010, Mr. Smernoff was an Assistant Controller for various private entities managed by EMG. Prior to January 2007, Mr. Smernoff was employed as a manager in the assurance practice of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, where he was primarily focused on providing audit and accounting services to a variety of clients in the investment management industry. Mr. Smernoff is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and holds a B.S. in Accounting and Finance from Boston College.
JR Herlihy
Chief Operating Officer
42Mr. Herlihy joined EMG in April 2011 and has served as our Chief Operating Officer since April 2018 and as our Treasurer since May 2017. In addition, Mr. Herlihy has been the Chief Financial Officer of EFC since April 2018 and its Treasurer since May 2017. Mr. Herlihy is also a Managing Director at EMG, where he has served in various capacities, including serving as Co-Chief Investment Officer of Ellington Housing Inc. ("EHR"), a real estate investment trust that was focused on single- and multi-family residential real estate assets, from EHR's inception in September 2012 through December 2016. Mr. Herlihy also served as EHR's Interim Chief Financial Officer from March 2015 through January 2016. Prior to April 2011, Mr. Herlihy held various positions in the real estate industry, including at the real estate private equity firm GTIS Partners LP, Capmark Financial Group (formerly GMAC Commercial Mortgage), and Jones Lang LaSalle. Mr. Herlihy earned a B.A. in Economics and History from Dartmouth College, summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa.
Daniel Margolis
General Counsel
50Mr. Margolis has been our General Counsel since April 2013 and also served as our Secretary from inception to April 2013. Mr. Margolis has also served as General Counsel of EMG and of EFC since July 2010. He is responsible for advising EMG on all legal, regulatory, compliance, documentation and litigation matters. Prior to joining EMG, Mr. Margolis was a Partner at Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman LLP from 2007 to 2010 and before that was a Junior Partner at Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale and Dorr LLP from 2004 to 2007. In both positions, Mr. Margolis represented corporations and individuals, including financial services organizations, in criminal and regulatory investigations and in complex civil litigation. From 2000 to 2004, he served as an Assistant United States Attorney in the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York where he prosecuted a variety of white collar crimes including securities fraud, investment fraud, tax fraud and money laundering. In 2004, he received the John Marshall Award, the Department of Justice's highest award for excellence in legal performance. He has a J.D. from New York University Law School, where he graduated cum laude, and a B.A. from Binghamton University where he graduated magna cum laude with highest honors in Political Science and was a member of Phi Beta Kappa.
12

Item 11. Executive Compensation
Board of Trustees Compensation
For the year ended December 31, 2023, our trustee compensation program consisted of an annual cash retainer of $65,000 for each of our independent trustees. In addition, the Chairman of our Board and the Chairman of each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our Board also received an additional annual cash retainer of $25,000, $15,000, $7,500, and $7,500, respectively. Each of our independent trustees may periodically reviewis eligible to receive awards under our investment guidelines2023 Equity Incentive Plan (and, prior to its termination, our 2013 Equity Incentive Plan) and our portfolio, they generally do not review our proposed asset acquisitions or asset management decisions.
With respecttrustee compensation program has historically included annual awards under the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan and prior to MBS, Ellington's investment philosophy primarily revolves around the pursuitadoption of value across various types of MBS and related assets. Ellington seeks investments across a wide range of MBS sectors without any restriction as to ratings, structure, or positionthe 2023 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, typically issued in the capital structure. Over time and through market cycles, opportunities will present themselves in varying sectors and in varying forms. By rotating between and allocating among various sectorsthird quarter, of restricted common shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value per share, of the RMBS markets and adjustingCompany, or "Common Shares," that vest over a one-year period subject to the extent to which it hedges interest rate, prepayment, and credit risks, Ellington believes that it will be able to capitalizetrustee's continuous service on our Board. In 2023, each independent trustee received an award of restricted Common Shares under the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan, with a value on the disparities between these RMBS sectorsdate of grant equal to approximately $53,000.
We reimburse our trustees for any travel expenses incurred in connection with their attendance at full Board and committee meetings as well as the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and certain trustee education events (if any).
Compensation of Our Trustees in 2023
The table below describes the compensation earned by our trustees during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023. Any member of our Board who is also an employee of our Manager, EMG, or their respective affiliates does not receive additional compensation for serving on overall trendsour Board.
NameFees Earned
or Paid in Cash
Restricted Common Share Awards (1)
All Other Compensation(2)
Total Compensation
Robert B. Allardice, III$105,000 $53,001 $6,843 $164,844 
David J. Miller72,500 53,001 6,843 132,344 
Ronald I. Simon, Ph.D.72,500 53,001 6,843 132,344 
Mary McBride65,000 53,001 6,843 124,844 
Laurence E. Penn— — — — 
Michael W. Vranos— — — — 
(1)Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of awards of 8,230 restricted Common Shares granted to each independent trustee on September 13, 2023 pursuant to our 2023 Equity Incentive Plan. The aggregate grant date fair value was calculated in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board's, or "FASB," Accounting Standards Codification, or "ASC," Topic 718, disregarding any potential forfeitures. See "Note 2—Significant Accounting Policies" to the notes to consolidated financial statements in the marketplace,Original Filing, for additional information regarding the assumptions underlying such calculation. These awards will vest in full on September 12, 2024, subject to the independent trustees' continuous service on our Board through such date. Other than such restricted Common Share awards, none of our independent trustees were granted any outstanding stock awards or option awards during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.
(2)Amounts reported in this column represent cash paid with respect to dividends paid during 2023 on unvested restricted Common Share awards held by our independent trustees.
Executive Compensation
We are currently considered a "smaller reporting company" for purposes of the SEC's executive compensation disclosure rules. In accordance with such rules, we are required to provide a Summary Compensation Table and therefore provide betteran Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End Table, as well as limited narrative disclosures. Further, our reporting obligations extend only to the individuals serving as our Chief Executive Officer, and more consistent returns. Disparities between RMBS sectors vary from timeour two other most highly compensated executive officers.
The following individuals were our named executive officers ("NEOs") for the year ended December 31, 2023:
•Laurence E. Penn, our Chief Executive Officer and President;
•Christopher Smernoff, our Chief Financial Officer; and
•JR Herlihy, our Chief Operating Officer.
As an externally managed company, none of our executive officers are employees of the Company. In fact, we do not have any employees, and we are managed by our Manager, pursuant to time andour management agreement. Our executive officers are drivenemployed by a combinationaffiliates of factors. For example, as various RMBS sectors fall in and out of favor, the relative yields that the market demands for those sectors may vary. In addition, Ellington's performance projections for certain sectors may differ from those of other market participants and such disparities will naturally cause us, from time to time, to gravitate towards certain sectors and away from others. Disparities between RMBS sectors and individual securities within such sectors may also be driven by differences in collateral performance, in servicer behavior and in the structure of particular investments (for example, in the timing of cash flows),our Manager or EMG, and our Manager may believe that other market participants are overestimating or underestimating the value of these differences. Furthermore, we believe that riskmakes them available to us pursuant to our management including opportunistic portfolio hedging and prudent financing and liquidityagreement. Except as set forth below, because our management is essential for consistent generation of attractive current yields and risk-adjusted total returns.
Ellington's continued emphasis on and development of proprietary RMBS, interest rate, prepayment, and credit models, as well as other proprietary research and analytics, underscores the importance it places on a disciplined and analytical approach to fixed income investing, especially in RMBS. Our Manager uses Ellington's proprietary models to identify attractive assets, value these assets, monitor and forecast the performance of these assets, and (subject to qualifying and maintaining our qualification as a REIT) opportunistically hedge our interest rate risk, hedge our prepayment risk, and hedge our credit risk. We leverage these skills and resources for purposes of attaining our objectives.
We believeagreement provides that our Manager is uniquely qualifiedresponsible for managing our affairs, our executive officers do not receive cash compensation from us for serving as our executive officers, and
13

we do not pay or provide benefits, nor do we reimburse the cost of any compensation or benefits paid by our Manager, EMG or their affiliates, to implement our strategy. Our strategy is consistentexecutive officers.
We do not currently have any agreements with Ellington's investment approach, which isany of our executive officers regarding their cash compensation and we do not intend to enter into any such agreement or pay any cash compensation directly to them. Additionally, our management agreement does not require that our executive officers devote a specific percentage of their time to our business. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we are required by our management agreement to reimburse our Manager for the costs of the wages (including bonuses), salaries, and benefits incurred by our Manager or EMG with respect to our Chief Financial Officer and our Chief Operating Officer (together, the "Compensated NEOs"), in each case, based on its distinctive strengthsthe estimated percentage of their time spent on our affairs and subject to the approval of the amount of such reimbursement by our Compensation Committee. In addition, we have the discretion to pay annual cash bonuses directly to our NEOs and make incentive equity awards to our NEOs in sourcing, analyzing, trading,amounts that are subject to approval by our Compensation Committee. All of our NEOs, including our Chief Financial Officer and hedging for complex MBSour Chief Operating Officer, are partially dedicated, which means they spend a portion of their time on the affairs of the Company and other mortgage- and non-mortgage-related products. Furthermore, we believe that Ellington's extensive experience in buying, selling, analyzing, and structuring fixed income securities, coupled with its broad accessa portion of their time dedicated to market information and trading flows, provides us with a steady flowthe affairs of opportunities to acquire assets with favorable trade executions.our Manager or EMG.

Our Targeted Assets
Our targeted asset classes currently include:
Asset ClassPrincipal Assets
Agency RMBSžAgency RMBS collateralized by fixed rate mortgage loans, adjustable rate mortgage loans, or "ARMs," or hybrid mortgage loans, reverse mortgages, or derivatives thereof, including:
žwhole and partial pool mortgage pass-through certificates;
žAgency collateralized mortgage obligations, or "CMOs," including interest only securities, or "IOs," principal only securities, or "POs," inverse interest only securities, or "IIOs," and inverse floaters; and
žTo-Be-Announced mortgage pass-through certificates, or "TBAs."
Non-Agency RMBSžRMBS backed by prime jumbo, Alt-A, manufactured housing, and subprime mortgages;
žRMBS backed by fixed rate mortgages, ARMs, Option-ARMs, and residential mortgage loans that have interest rates that are fixed for a specified period of time (typically three, five, seven, or ten years) and, thereafter, adjust to an increment over a specified interest rate index, or "hybrid ARMs";
žRMBS backed by first lien and second lien mortgages;
žInvestment grade and non-investment grade securities;
žSenior and subordinated securities; and
žNon-Agency CMOs, including IOs, POs, IIOs, and inverse floaters.
OtheržResidential mortgage loans;
žMSRs; and
žOther mortgage- and real estate-related assets, including asset-backed securities and certain hedging transactions.
Summary Compensation Table
The following briefly discussestable sets forth the principal types of assets we purchase.
Agency RMBS
Residential Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates—Residential mortgage pass-through certificates represent interests in "pools" of mortgage loans secured by residential real property where payments of both interest and principal, plus prepayments, on the underlying residential mortgage loans are made monthly to holders of the certificates, in effect "passing through" monthly payments made by the individual borrowers on the mortgage loans that underlie the securities, net of feescompensation paid to the issuer/guarantor and servicersCompensated NEOs for services they rendered to us during the fiscal years presented. NEOs who did not receive any compensation for their services rendered to us in the fiscal years presented have been omitted from the table.
Name and Principal PositionYear
Salary(1)
Bonus(2)
Stock Awards(3)
All Other Compensation(4)
Total
Christopher Smernoff
Chief Financial Officer
2023$43,425 $43,981 $28,150 $5,525 $121,081 
202245,833 42,429 28,601 5,352 122,215 
JR Herlihy
Chief Operating Officer
202351,000 90,405 63,754 11,525 216,684 
202249,271 64,350 58,235 11,344 183,200 
(1)Reflects the portion of the securities.executive officer's base salary that we were required to reimburse to the Manager.
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations—CMOs(2)Reflects the portion of the executive officer's bonuses that were earned in 2023 and for which we were required to reimburse to the Manager. Messrs, Smernoff and Herlihy earned the remainder of their deferred 2022 cash bonuses ($7,150 for Mr. Smernoff and $22,575 for Mr. Herlihy) on December 31, 2023. Approximately 27% of Mr. Smernoff's and approximately 36% of Mr. Herlihy's 2023 cash bonus ($13,832 for Mr. Smernoff and $38,420 for Mr. Herlihy) will not be earned until December 31, 2024 and, in accordance with SEC rules, has not been included in this table.
(3)Represents the aggregate grant date fair value awards granted on December 14, 2023, under our 2023 Equity Incentive Plan to Mr. Smernoff and Mr. Herlihy of 4,433 and 10,040 restricted Common Shares, respectively. The aggregate grant date fair value was calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, disregarding any potential forfeitures. See "Note 2—Significant Accounting Policies" to the notes to consolidated financial statements in the Original Filing, for additional information regarding the assumptions underlying such calculation. These awards will vest in substantially equal installments on each of December 14, 2024 and December 14, 2025, subject to Mr. Smernoff’s and Mr. Herlihy’s continuous employment through such date.
(4)Amounts in this column represent dividend cash amounts paid to the executive officers in respect of their unvested restricted Common Share awards in each respective year.
Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table
Employment Agreements
We have not entered into employment agreements with any of our executive officers, including the NEOs.
Elements of Compensation
We do not reimburse our Manager or EMG for any of the compensation paid to Mr. Penn (who is our only NEO who is not a Compensated NEO), but rather EMG compensates Mr. Penn out of its overall revenue stream, including the management fees that we pay to our Manager. Our management agreement does not require that any specified amount or percentage of the management fees that we pay to the Manager be allocated to Mr. Penn. Based on discussions with our Manager and EMG, we estimate that Mr. Penn received no compensation for 2023 that is associated with the $1.8 million in management fees that we paid to the Manager for 2023. Rather, the entire amount of such management fees was used to compensate employees of EMG other than Mr. Penn.
The components of the compensation program for our Compensated NEOs in 2023 and 2022 consisted of (1) base salary paid by EMG and reimbursed in part by us, (2) a discretionary cash bonus paid by EMG and reimbursed in part by us, and (3) a restricted Common Share award granted by us. We are structured instruments representing interests in specified mortgage loan collateral. CMO securitizations consistrequired to reimburse EMG for the portion of multiple classes, or "tranches,"the base salary and any discretionary cash bonus of securities, with each tranche having specified characteristicsthe Compensated NEOs that is allocated to us based on the rules describedestimated percentage of their time spent managing our affairs, subject to the approval of the amount of such reimbursement by our Compensation Committee. While we
14

have the discretion to provide annual cash bonuses directly to our NEOs, we did not approve any such bonuses for 2023 and have not historically provided such bonuses.
Base Salary
Each of the Compensated NEOs is an employee of EMG. Under the terms of their respective employment arrangements with EMG, Mr. Smernoff earned an annual base salary in 2023 of $270,000 and Mr. Herlihy earned an annual base salary in 2023 of $300,000. In determining whether the amount of each Compensated NEO's' base salary for 2023 was reasonable and appropriate, our Compensation Committee considered primarily each Compensated NEO's duties and responsibilities, the performance of our Company, and their performance based on both the members of the Compensation Committee's own observations as members of our Audit Committee and Board and the assessment and recommendation of our Chief Executive Officer/President and our Co-Chief Investment Officer (which takes into account such officers' review of the compensation provided to similar employees of similarly situated companies).
For 2024, we expect that our Compensation Committee will take into account substantially similar criteria in determining whether the amount of each Compensated NEO's base salary is reasonable and appropriate.
Discretionary Cash Bonus and Restricted Common Shares
In addition, on December 14, 2023, our Compensation Committee approved reimbursement of an incentive cash bonus paid by EMG to Mr. Smernoff of $50,663 subject to deferral of approximately 27% of such cash bonus until December 31, 2024 and an incentive cash bonus to Mr. Herlihy of $106,250 subject to deferral of approximately 36% of such cash bonus until December 31, 2024. The deferred portion of the cash bonus paid to Messrs. Smernoff and Herlihy is subject to forfeiture prior to December 31, 2024.
The Compensation Committee also approved, on December 14, 2024, awards under our 2023 Equity Incentive Plan to Mr. Smernoff and Mr. Herlihy of 4,433 and 10,040 restricted Common Shares, respectively. The Common Shares subject to the awards granted to Messrs. Smernoff and Herlihy are subject to forfeiture restrictions that will lapse in substantially equal installments on each of December 14, 2024 and December 14, 2025, subject to the Compensated NEO's continuous employment through each such date.
For our NEOs, we and EMG do not employ contractual formulas in determining discretionary compensation, but instead take into account factors such as the officer’s position, the officer’s contribution to our Company and/or to EMG’s businesses, the performance of our Company and/or EMG, market practices, reviews by the officer’s superiors, compensation provided to similar employees of similarly situated companies, and, with respect to officers (such as Mr. Smernoff and Mr. Herlihy) whose compensation is only partially reimbursed by us, the compensation they receive from other sources (such as, for Mr. Smernoff and Mr. Herlihy, from EFC for their services as EFC’s partially dedicated Chief Accounting Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively), and the percentage of their working time and efforts spent on matters related solely to us.
In determining whether the amount of each Compensated NEO's bonus for 2023, for which we are responsible for our allocable portion, was reasonable and appropriate for reimbursement by our Company and whether to approve their restricted Common Share award, our Compensation Committee considered primarily each Compensated NEO's performance, based both on their own observations as members of our Audit Committee and Board and on the assessments and recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer/President, and our Co-Chief Investment Officer (which take into account such officers' review of information relating to the compensation provided to similar employees of similarly situated companies), the performance of our Company, the compensation that each Compensated NEO receives for service as an executive officer of EFC, and the estimated percentage of their time and efforts managing our affairs. Our Compensation Committee also considered the total compensation that each Compensated NEO would earn for 2023 (including compensation received for service as an executive officer of EFC) and whether the amount seemed reasonable and appropriate based on their personal experience and knowledge regarding executive compensation. Taking all of these factors into account, our Compensation Committee determined that reimbursement for such cash bonus and such awards of restricted Common Shares was reasonable and appropriate for Mr. Smernoff and Mr. Herlihy.
Mr. Smernoff and Mr. Herlihy are entitled to receive dividends on all of their restricted Common Share awards. Cash dividends are paid on the restricted Common Share awards at the same time and rate as is paid to all other holders of our Common Shares as of the applicable record date. In 2023, Mr. Smernoff received $5,525 of dividends on his unvested restricted Common Share awards and Mr. Herlihy received $11,525 of dividends on his unvested restricted Common Share awards.
For 2024, we expect that our Compensation Committee will take into account substantially similar criteria in determining whether the amount of our Compensated NEO's bonuses, for which we will be responsible for our allocable portion, is reasonable and appropriate for reimbursement by our Company and whether to approve a restricted Common Share award for them.
15

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
The following table lists the restricted Common Shares awarded to our NEOs that were unvested and outstanding as of December 31, 2023.
Stock Awards
NameNumber of Common Shares
That Have Not Vested
Market Value of Common Shares That Have Not Vested (1)
Christopher Smernoff(2)
6,427$39,398 
JR Herlihy(3)
14,10186,439 
(1)Value is determined by multiplying the number of unvested restricted Common Shares by $6.13, the closing price for our Common Shares on the NYSE on December 29, 2023, the last trading day of the year.
(2)The restricted Common Shares are subject to forfeiture prior to December 14, 2024 in the securitization documents governingcase of 2,217 Common Shares, December 15, 2024 in the divisioncase of 1,994 Common Shares, and December 14, 2025 in the case of 2,216 Common Shares.
(3)The restricted Common Shares are subject to forfeiture prior to December 14, 2024 in the case of 5,020 Common Shares, December 15, 2024 in the case of 4,061 Common Shares, and December 14, 2025 in the case of 5,020 Common Shares.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
Since our NEOs are employees of EMG, we generally do not have any obligation to make any payments to any of our NEOs upon a termination of employment or upon a change in control.
Our Compensated NEOs are subject to standard employment contracts for the benefit of EMG. If a Compensated NEO were terminated other than for cause or voluntary resignation, the deferred portion of such executive officer's 2023 cash bonus and any outstanding unvested restricted Common Shares held by such executive officer would continue to vest under the terms of their employment contract. In addition, upon a change in control, the restricted Common Shares would immediately vest under the terms of their Common Share award agreements.
Pay Versus Performance Table
As required by Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information regarding the relationship between executive compensation and the Company’s financial performance for each of 2021, 2022, and 2023. The table below summarizes the (i) compensation values reported in the Summary Compensation Table for our principal executive officer ("PEO") and average for our other non-PEO NEOs as compared to the "Compensation Actually Paid," calculated pursuant to the applicable rules and (ii) Company's financial performance for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021.
Year
Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO(1)
Compensation Actually Paid to PEO(1)(2)
Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs(1)
Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs(1)(2)
Total Shareholder Return(3)
Net Income (Loss)(4)
(In thousands)
2023$— $— $168,883 $161,862 $68.00 $4,559 
2022— — 152,708 123,890 66.05(30,198)
2021— — 164,126 146,756 88.06(6,309)
(1)For each of the monthly principalyears included above, the PEO was Laurence E. Penn and interest distributions, including prepayments,the non-PEO NEOs were JR Herlihy and Christopher Smernoff. As reflected in the Summary Compensation Table and noted elsewhere in this Amendment or the Original Filing, because our management agreement provides that our Manager is responsible for managing our affairs, our NEOs do not receive any cash compensation from us or any of our subsidiaries for serving as our executive officers. However, we are required by our management agreement to reimburse our Manager or EMG for the underlying mortgage collateral amongallocable share of the various tranches. IOs are CMOs that only receive interest payments while POs receive only principal payments.
TBAs—In additionsalary and other compensation paid by our Manager or EMG to investing in specific poolscertain of Agency RMBS, subjectour executive officers who dedicated all or a portion of such officer’s time to our satisfying the requirements for qualification as a REIT, we utilize forward-settling purchases and sales of Agency RMBS where the underlying pools of mortgage loans are TBAs. Pursuant to these TBA transactions, we agree to purchase or sell, for future delivery, Agency RMBS with certain principal and interest terms and certain types of underlying collateral, but the particular Agency RMBS to be delivered is not identified until shortly before the TBA settlement date. TBAs are generally liquid and have quoted market prices and represent the most actively traded class of RMBS. We use TBAs primarily for hedging purposes. TBA trading isus, based on the assumption that mortgage poolsestimated percentage of such officer's time spent on our affairs. For the years presented above, Mr. Smernoff, our Chief Financial Officer, and Mr. Herlihy, our Chief Operating Officer, were the only NEOs for which we paid or reimbursed any portion of the compensation paid by our Manager.
(2)For details regarding how the amounts in this column are calculated, refer to the “Adjustments to Summary Compensation Tables to Determine Compensation Actually Paid" table immediately below.
(3)Total Shareholder Return assumes $100 invested at December 31, 2020 in common stock of the Company and the reinvestment of dividends.
(4)Reflects the Company's net income (loss) prepared in accordance with GAAP for each of the years shown.
16

Compensation Actually Paid represents totals from the Summary Compensation Table above, adjusted for certain items as detailed in the following table for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2022, and 2023:
Adjustments to Summary Compensation Tables to Determine Compensation Actually Paid202120222023
Average for Non-PEO NEOs Summary Compensation Table—Total$164,126 $152,708 $168,883 
Deduction of Average Amounts Reported under the "Stock Awards" column in the Summary Compensation Table(58,924)(43,418)(45,952)
Add (Subtract):
Average of the year-end fair value of any equity awards granted in the covered fiscal year that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the covered fiscal year58,698 41,541 44,360 
Average amount of change as of the end of the covered fiscal year (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value of any awards granted in prior years that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the covered fiscal year(5,899)(9,970)(2,210)
For awards granted in prior years that vest in the covered fiscal year, the amount equal to the average change as of the vesting date (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value(11,245)(16,971)(3,219)
Total Equity Award Related Adjustments(17,370)(28,818)(7,021)
Average Compensation Actually Paid—Total$146,756 $123,890 $161,862 
The following graph illustrates the relationship between average Compensation Actually Paid to our non-PEO NEOs and the Company's cumulative total return on our Common Shares, assuming a $100 investment on December 31, 2020 and the reinvestment of dividends for each year presented below. We did not include a graph illustrating the relationship between average Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and the Company's cumulative total return on our Common Shares because, as discussed elsewhere in this Amendment or the Original Filing, we do not compensate our PEO.
549755835018
17

The following graph illustrates the relationship between average Compensation Actually Paid to our non-PEO NEOs and the Company's net income (loss) for each year presented below. We did not include a graph illustrating the relationship between average Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and the Company's net income (loss) because, as discussed elsewhere in this Amendment or the Original Filing, we do not compensate our PEO.
549755835433
Please see "Executive Compensation—Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table" above for more information on how the Compensation Actually Paid to our Compensated NEOs is determined.
18

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters
Security Ownership of Management and Certain Beneficial Owners
The following table sets forth, as of April 5, 2024, certain ownership information with respect to our Common Shares for those persons known to us to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of our outstanding Common Shares, if any, and all of our trustees, each of the NEOs and all of the trustees and executive officers as a group. In accordance with SEC rules, each listed person's beneficial ownership includes:
•all Common Shares the investor actually owns beneficially or of record;
•all Common Shares over which the investor has or shares voting or dispositive control (such as in the capacity as a general partner of a fund); and
•all Common Shares the investor has the right to acquire within 60 days of April 5, 2024 (such as upon exercise of options that are eligiblecurrently vested or which are scheduled to be delivered at TBA settlementvest within 60 days).
Common Shares Beneficially Owned
Name and AddressNumber
Percentage of 
Outstanding
Common Shares(1)
Trustees and Named Executive Officers:(2)
Michael W. Vranos(3)
139,605 0.7 %
Laurence E. Penn35,710 *
Robert B. Allardice, III(4)
41,231 *
David J. Miller(4)(5)
51,231 *
Mary McBride(4)
19,195 *
Ronald I. Simon, Ph.D.(4)
54,992 *
Christopher Smernoff(6)
20,537 *
JR Herlihy(7)
35,593 *
All executive officers and trustees as a group (10 persons)(8)
406,376 2.1 %
* Denotes beneficial ownership of less than 1% of our Common Shares.
(1)Based on an aggregate amount of 19,819,610 Common Shares issued and outstanding as of April 5, 2024. Assumes that derivative securities, if any, beneficially owned by a person are fungibleexercised for Common Shares. The total number of Common Shares outstanding used in calculating this percentage assumes that none of the derivative securities owned by other persons are exercised for Common Shares.
(2)The address for all NEOs and thustrustees is Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT, 53 Forest Avenue, Old Greenwich, CT 06870.
(3)Includes 106,472 Common Shares held directly by EMG Holdings, L.P., or "EMGH." VC Investments L.L.C., or "VC," and Michael W. Vranos each has shared voting and dispositive power over these Common Shares. VC is the specific mortgage poolsgeneral partner of EMGH. Mr. Vranos is the managing member of, and holds a controlling interest in VC. The address for each entity is 53 Forest Avenue, Old Greenwich, CT 06870.
(4)Includes 8,230 Common Shares that will vest on September 12, 2024.
(5)Mr. Miller holds 10,000 of such Common Shares in a joint account with his spouse.
(6)Includes 2,217 Common Shares that will vest on December 14, 2024, 1,994 Common Shares that will vest on December 15, 2024, and 2,216 Common Shares that will vest on December 14, 2025
(7)Includes 5,020 Common Shares that will vest on December 14, 2024, 4,061 Common Shares that will vest on December 15, 2024, and 5,020 Common Shares that will vest on December 14, 2025.
(8)Includes 32,920 Common Shares that will vest on September 12, 2024, 7,237 Common Shares that will vest on December 14, 2024, 6,055 Common Shares that will vest on December 15, 2024, and 7,236 Common Shares that will vest on December 14, 2025.
19

Equity Compensation Plan Information
Our 2023 Equity Incentive Plan is currently the only compensation plan under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance. The 2013 Equity Incentive Plan has terminated but still has unvested restricted Common Shares issued pursuant to be deliveredit. The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2023 with respect to the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan.
Plan CategoryNumber of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)Weighted-average exercise price of our outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(3)
53,448(1)N/A(2)1,143,843
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders———
(1)There are 6,055 unvested restricted Common Shares outstanding pursuant to our 2013 Equity Incentive Plan and 47,393 unvested restricted Common Shares outstanding pursuant to our 2023 Equity Incentive Plan.
(2)All outstanding awards issued under either the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan or 2023 Equity Incentive Plan represent restricted Common Shares, which do not needhave an exercise price.
(3)The 2023 Equity Incentive Plan contains a formula for calculating the number of securities available for issuance thereunder. The maximum number of Common Shares that may be issued under the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan will be adjusted so that the maximum aggregate number of Common Shares that may be issued under the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan is equal to (i) 2,500,000 Common Shares; provided that, the actual number of Common Shares that may be explicitly identified atissued under the time2023 Equity Incentive Plan shall not exceed five percent (5.00%) of the total number of Common Shares outstanding plus (ii) 255,108 Common Shares remaining available for issuance under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan plus (iii) 6,055 Common Shares issued pursuant to awards granted under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan that subsequently are forfeited, expire, or lapse unexercised.
20

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Each of our trustees and trustee nominees and executive officers is required to complete an annual disclosure questionnaire and report all transactions with us in which they and their immediate family members had or will have a tradedirect or indirect material interest with respect to us. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee generally reviews any past or proposed transactions between our Company and related persons (as such term is initiated.defined in Item 404 of Regulation S-K). If we believe a transaction is significant to us and raises particular conflict of interest issues, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will discuss the matter with legal or other appropriate counsel to evaluate and approve the transaction.
We primarily engageTransactions Effected by EMG and its Affiliates in TBA transactions for purposesRespect of managing interest rate risk associated withOur Portfolio
Mr. Vranos, our liabilities under repurchase agreements, or "repos."Co-Chief Investment Officer and Trustee, Mr. Penn, our Chief Executive Officer, President and Trustee, Mark Tecotzky, our Co-Chief Investment Officer, and Daniel Margolis, our General Counsel, each also serves as an officer of EMG. We generally treat such TBA purchases and sales as hedging transactions that hedge indebtedness incurred to acquire or carry real estate assets, or "qualifying liability hedges," for REIT purposes. Alternatively, we may from time to time opportunistically engageenter into certain "related party transactions" with EMG and its affiliates including, subject to certain conditions and limitations, cross transactions, principal transactions and the purchase of securities in TBA transactions because we find them attractive in their own right, from a relative value perspective or otherwise. Our ability to engage in TBA transactions may be limited by our intention to remain qualified as a REIT. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principlesother accounts of EMG which are described in the United States of America, or "U.S. GAAP," we treat TBAs as derivative transactions.

Non-Agency RMBS
We acquire non-Agency RMBS backed by prime jumbo, Alt-A, manufactured housing, and subprime residential mortgage loans. Our non-Agency RMBS holdings can include investment grade and non-investment grade classes, including non-rated classes.
Non-Agency RMBS are debt obligations issued by private originators of, or investors in, residential mortgage loans. Non-Agency RMBS generally are issued as CMOs and are backed by pools of whole mortgage loans or by mortgage pass-through certificates. Non-Agency RMBS generally are in the form of senior/subordinated structures, or in the form of excess spread/over-collateralization structures. In senior/subordinated structures, the subordinated tranches generally absorb all losses on the underlying mortgage loans before any losses are borne by the senior tranches. In excess spread/over-collateralization structures, losses are first absorbed by any existing over-collateralization, then are borne by subordinated tranches and excess spread, which represents the difference between the interest payments received on the mortgage loans backing the RMBS and the interest due on the RMBS debt tranches, and finally are borne by senior tranches and any remaining excess spread.
Other Assets
We also may from time to time opportunistically acquire other mortgage- and real estate-related assets that may include, among others, residential mortgage loans and MSRs.
Investment Process
Our investment process benefits from the resources and professionals of our Manager and Ellington. The process is managed by an investment and risk management committee, which includes, among others, the following three officers of our Manager: Messrs. Vranos, Penn, and Tecotzky. These officers of our Manager also serve as our Co-Chief Investment Officer, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Co-Chief Investment Officer, respectively. The investment and risk management committee operates under investment guidelines and meets periodically to develop a set of preferences for the composition of our portfolio. The primary focus of the investment and risk management committee is to review and approve our investment policies and our portfolio composition and related compliance with our investment policies and guidelines. Under the management agreement between us and our Manager, our Manager has the authority to enter into transactions consistent with our investment guidelines, subject to the oversight of our Board of Trustees.
Ellington has a focused investment team for each of our targeted asset classes. Each team evaluates acquisition opportunities consistent with our investment guidelines. Our asset acquisition process includes sourcing and screening of asset acquisition opportunities, credit analysis, due diligence, structuring, financing, and hedging, each as appropriate, to seek attractive current yields and total returns commensurate with our risk tolerance. We also screen and monitor potential asset acquisitions to determine their impact on maintaining our exclusion from registration as an investment company under the Investment Company Act and our qualification as a REIT.
Valuation of Assets
Our Manager's valuation process is subject to the oversight of our Manager's Valuation Committee as well as the oversight of the independent members of our Board of Trustees. See Note 2 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this report for a complete discussion of our valuation process.
Risk Management
Risk management is a cornerstone of Ellington's portfolio management process. Ellington's risk management infrastructure system includes "ELLiN," a proprietary portfolio management system that Ellington uses for its accounts, which provides real-time and batch reporting to all departments at Ellington, including trading, research, risk management, finance, operations, accounting, and compliance. We benefit from Ellington's comprehensive risk management infrastructure and ongoing assessment of both portfolio and operational risks. In addition, we utilize derivatives and other hedging instruments to opportunistically manage our interest rate risk.
Interest Rate Hedging
We opportunistically manage our interest rate risk by using various hedging strategies to mitigate such risks, subject to maintaining our qualification as a REIT and maintaining our exclusion from registration as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. The interest rate hedging instruments that we use and may use in the future include, without limitation:
interest rate swaps (including floating-to-fixed, fixed-to-floating, or more complex swaps such as floating-to-inverse floating, callable or non-callable);

TBAs;
CMOs;
U.S. Treasury securities;
futures and forward contracts; and
other derivatives on interest rates, including swaptions and other options on any of the foregoing.
Because fluctuations in short-term interest rates may expose us to fluctuations in the spread between the interest we earn on our investments and the interest we pay on our borrowings, we may seek to manage such exposure by entering into short positions in interest rate swaps. An interest rate swap is an agreement to exchange interest rate cash flows, calculated on a notional principal amount, at specified payment dates during the life of the agreement. Typically, one party pays a fixed interest rate and receives a floating interest rate and the other party pays a floating interest rate and receives a fixed interest rate. Each party's payment obligation is computed using a different interest rate. In an interest rate swap, the notional principal is generally not exchanged.
We also utilize TBAs. Pursuant to a TBA transaction, we agree to purchase or sell, for future delivery, Agency RMBS with certain principal and interest terms and certain types of underlying collateral, but the particular Agency RMBS to be delivered is not identified until shortly before the TBA settlement date. We primarily engage in TBA transactions for purposes of managing interest rate risk associated with our liabilities under repurchase agreements. Alternatively, we may, from time to time, opportunistically engage in TBA transactions because we find them attractive on their own, from a relative value perspective or otherwise. Our ability to engage in TBA transactions may be limited by our intention to remain qualified as a REIT.
Credit Risk Hedging
Although we do not operate our non-Agency RMBS investment strategy on a credit-hedged basis in general, we may from time to time opportunistically enter into short positions using credit default swaps to protect against adverse credit events with respect to our non-Agency RMBS, subject to maintaining our qualification as a REIT and maintaining our exclusion from registration as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. We may use credit default swaps to hedge non-Agency RMBS credit risk by buying protection on various MBS indices. We may also enter into other derivative contracts for credit hedging purposes, including contracts referencing the unsecured corporate credit, or the equity of, certain corporations, including indices on corporate debt and equity.
Liquidity Management
As part of the risk management and liquidity management functions that our Manager performs for us, our Manager computes a "cash buffer," which, at any given point in time, represents the amount of our free cash in excess of what our Manager estimates would conservatively be required, especially in times of market dislocation, to support our particular assets and liabilities at such time. Thus, rather than focusing solely on our leverage, our Manager typically seeks to maintain a positive cash buffer. However, our Manager is not required to maintain a positive cash buffer and may choose not to maintain a positive cash buffer at certain times, for example, if it believes there are compelling market opportunities to pursue.
Our Financing Strategies and Use of Leverage
We finance our assets with what we believe to be a prudent amount of leverage, which will vary from time to time based upon the particular characteristics of our portfolio, availability of financing and market conditions. In a repurchase agreement, we sell an asset to a counterparty at a discounted value, or the loan amount, and simultaneously agree to repurchase the same asset from such counterparty at a future date at a price equal to the loan amount plus an interest factor. Despite being legally structured as sales and subsequent repurchases, repurchase agreements are accounted for as collateralized borrowings. During the term of a repurchase agreement, we generally receive the income and other payments distributed with respect to the underlying assets, and pay interest to the counterparty. While the proceeds of our repurchase agreements are often used to purchase the asset subject to the transaction, our financing arrangements do not restrict our ability to use proceeds from these arrangements to support our other liquidity needs. Our repurchase agreement arrangements are typically documented under the standard form master repurchase agreement of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, with the ability for both parties to request margin (i.e., to demand that the other party post additional collateral or repay a portion of the funds advanced) should the value of the underlying assets and posted collateral change. As the value of our collateral fluctuates, we and our repurchase agreement counterparties are required to post additional margin collateral to each other from time to time as part of the normal course of our business. Our repurchase agreement financing counterparties generally have the right, to varying degrees, to determine the value of the underlying collateral for margining purposes, subject to the terms and conditions of our agreement with the counterparty, including in certain cases our right to dispute the counterparty's valuation

determination. As of December 31, 2016, we had approximately $1.2 billion outstanding under repurchase agreements with thirteen counterparties, and given that we had approximately $141.7 million of shareholders' equity as of December 31, 2016, our debt-to-equity ratio was 8.5 to 1. Our debt-to-equity ratio does not account for liabilities other than debt financings.
We may utilize other types of borrowings in the future, including term facilities or other more complex financing structures. We also may raise capital by issuing unsecured debt, preferred or common shares, or depositary shares.
Our use of leverage, especially in order to increase the amount of assets supported by our capital base, may have the effect of increasing losses when these assets underperform. Our investment policies require no minimum or maximum leverage and our Manager's investment and risk management committee has the discretion, without the need for further approval by our Board of Trustees, to change both our overall leverage and the leverage used for individual asset classes. Because our strategy is flexible, dynamic, and opportunistic, our overall leverage will vary over time. As a result, we do not have a targeted debt-to-equity ratio.
Management Agreement
Upon our inception in September 2012, we entered into awritten management agreement with our Manager.
•Cross Transactions—defined as transactions between us or one of our subsidiaries, on the one hand, and an account (other than us or one of our subsidiaries) managed by EMG or our Manager, on the other hand. It is EMG policy to engage in a cross transaction only when the transaction is in the best interests of, and is consistent with the objectives and policies of, both accounts involved in the transaction. EMG or our Manager may enter into cross transactions where it acts both on our behalf and on behalf of the other party to the transaction. Upon written notice to our Manager, we may at any time revoke our consent to our Manager's executing cross transactions. Additionally, unless approved in advance by a majority of our independent trustees or pursuant to and in accordance with a policy that has been approved by a majority of our independent trustees, all cross transactions must be effected at the then-prevailing market prices. Pursuant to our Manager's current policies and procedures, assets for which there are no readily observable market prices may be purchased or sold in cross transactions (1) at prices based upon third party bids received through auction, (2) at the average of the highest bid and lowest offer quoted by third party dealers, or (3) according to another pricing methodology approved by our Manager's Chief Compliance Officer.
•Principal Transactions—defined as transactions between EMG or our Manager provides for(or any related party of EMG or our Manager, which includes employees of EMG and our Manager and their families), on the day-to-day managementone hand, and us or one of our operations. The management agreement, which was most recently amended and restated effective November 3, 2015, requiressubsidiaries, on the other hand. Certain cross transactions may also be considered principal transactions whenever our Manager, to manageEMG (or any related party of EMG or our business affairsManager, which includes employees of EMG and our Manager and their families) have a substantial ownership interest in conformity with policies and investment guidelines that are approved and monitored by our Boardone of Trustees.the transacting parties. Our Manager is subjectonly authorized to execute principal transactions with the direction and oversightprior approval of a majority of our Boardindependent trustees and in accordance with applicable law. Such prior approval includes approval of Trustees. Our Manager is responsible for, among other things:
the selection, purchase, and sale of our portfolio investments;
our financing and risk management activities;
providing us with advisory services; and
providing us with a management team, inclusive of a dedicated or partially dedicated Chief Financial Officer and appropriate support personnel as necessary.
Our Manager is responsible for our day-to-day operations and performs (or causespricing methodology to be performed) such services and activities relatingused, including with respect to our management, operation, and administration of our assets and liabilities, and business as may befor which there are no readily observable market prices.
appropriate.
Under•Investment in other EMG accounts—pursuant to the management agreement, we pay our Manager a management fee quarterly in arrears, and we reimburse certain expenses of our Manager.
Althoughalthough we have not done so to date, if we invest at issuance in the equity of any collateralized debt obligation, or "CDO," that is managed, structured or originated by EMG or one of its affiliates, or if we invest in any other investment fund or other investment for which EllingtonEMG or one of its affiliates receives management, origination or structuring fees, then, unless agreed otherwise by a majority of our independent trustees, the base management fees payable by us to our Manager will be reduced by (or our Manager will otherwise rebate to us) an amount equal to the applicable portion (as described in the management agreement) of any such related management, origination or structuring fees.
•Split price executions—pursuant to the management agreement, our Manager is authorized to combine purchase or sale orders on our behalf together with orders for other accounts managed by EMG, our Manager or their affiliates and allocate the securities or other assets so purchased or sold, on an average price basis or other fair and consistent basis, among such accounts.
To date, we have not entered into any cross transactions with other EMG-managed accounts or principal transactions with EMG, or invested in other EMG accounts.
Management Agreement
We entered into a management agreement with our Manager upon our inception in September 2012, pursuant to which our Manager provides for the day-to-day management of our operations. Mr. Vranos, our Co-Chief Investment Officer and Trustee, Mr. Penn, our Chief Executive Officer, President and Trustee, Mark Tecotzky, our Co-Chief Investment Officer, Christopher Smernoff, our Chief Financial Officer, JR Herlihy, our Chief Operating Officer, and Daniel Margolis, our General Counsel, each also serves as an officer of our Manager. The management agreement, as amended, requires our Manager to manage our assets, operations, and affairs in conformity with the policies and the investment guidelines that are approved and
21

monitored by our Board. A description of the material terms of the management agreement is included in "Item 1. Business—Management Agreement" in our Original Filing and our April 8-K.
Management Fees
Under the management agreement, we pay our Manager a management fee quarterly in arrears in an amount equal to 1.50% per annum of our shareholders' equity, with shareholders' equity being calculated, as of the end of any fiscal quarter, as (a) the sum of (1) the net proceeds from any issuances of common shares or other equity securities of our companyCompany or our Operating Partnership (without double counting) since inception, plus (2) our and our Operating Partnership's (without double counting) retained earnings (expressed as a positive number) or accumulated deficit (expressed as a negative number), as the case may be, calculated in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or "U.S. GAAP," at the end of the most recently completed fiscal quarter (without taking into account any non-cash equity compensation expense incurred in current or prior periods), less (b) any amount that we or our Operating Partnership has paid to repurchase our common shares,Common Shares, limited partnership interests in our Operating Partnership, or other equity securities since inception. Shareholders' equity excludes (1) non-cash equity compensation expenses that have impacted shareholders' equity as reported in our financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and (2) one-time events pursuant to changes in U.S. GAAP, and certain non-cash items not otherwise described above in each case, after discussions between our Manager and our independent trustees and approval by a majority of the independent trustees. Our shareholders' equity, for purposes of calculating the management fee, could be greater or less than the amount of shareholders' equity shown on our financial statements.
Reimbursement of Expenses
We do not maintain an office or employ personnel. We rely on the facilities and resources of our Manager to conduct our operations. We pay all of our direct operating expenses, except those specifically required to be borne by our Manager under the

management agreement. Our Manager is responsible for all costs incident to the performance of its duties under the management agreement, including compensation of Ellington's employees and other related expenses, other than our allocable portion of the costs incurred by our Manager for certain dedicated or partially dedicated employees including a Chief Financial Officer, one or more controllers, an in-house legal counsel, an investor relations professional, and certain internal audit staff in connection with Sarbanes-Oxley compliance initiatives, based on the portion of their working time and efforts spent on our matters and subject to approval of the reimbursed amounts by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Trustees. In addition, other than as expressly described in the management agreement, we are not required to pay any portion of rent, telephone, utilities, office furniture, equipment, machinery, and other office, internal and overhead expenses of our Manager and its affiliates. Expense reimbursements to our Manager are made within 60 days following delivery of the expense statement by our Manager.
Term and Termination
The initial term of the management agreement will expire in September 2017 and will be automatically renewed for a one-year term on such date and on each anniversary of such date thereafter unless terminated as described below.
Either we or our Manager may elect not to renew the management agreement upon expiration of its initial term or any renewal term by providing written notice of non-renewal at least 180 days, but not more than 270 days, before expiration. In the event we elect not to renew the term, we will be required to pay our Manager a termination fee equal to 5% of our Shareholders' Equity as of the end of the month preceding the date of the notice of termination or non-renewal of the management agreement. No termination fee will be due to the Manager if the Manager decides not to renew the management agreement.
We have the right to terminate the management agreement for cause, as defined in the management agreement, at any time during the term upon 30 days' prior written notice, without payment of any termination fee.
Our Board of Trustees reviews our Manager's performance annually and, as a result of such review, upon the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the members of our Board of Trustees or of the holders of a majority of our outstanding common shares, we may terminate the management agreement based either upon unsatisfactory performance by our Manager that is materially detrimental to us or upon a determination by our independent trustees that theTotal management fees payable to our Manager are not fair, subject to the right of our Manager to prevent such a fee-based termination by agreeing to a reduction of the management fees payable to our Manager. Upon any termination of the management agreement based on unsatisfactory performance or unfair management fees, we are required to pay our Manager the termination fee described above.
Our Manager may terminate the management agreement, without payment of the termination fee, in the event we become regulated as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. Our Manager may also terminate the management agreement upon 60 days written notice if we default in the performance of any material term of the management agreement and the default continuesincurred for a period of 30 days after written notice to us, whereupon we would be required to pay our Manager the termination fee described above.
Our Manager may generally only assign the management agreement with the written approval of a majority of our independent trustees. However, our Manager may assign to one or more of its affiliates the performance of any of its responsibilities under the management agreement without the approval of our independent trustees so long as our Manager remains liable for any such affiliate's performance and such assignment does not require our approval under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, or the "Advisers Act."
Conflicts of Interest; Equitable Allocation of Opportunities
Ellington manages various other clients that have strategies that are similar to, or overlap with, our strategy, including Ellington Financial LLC, a specialty finance company listed on the NYSE. As of December 31, 2016, Ellington managed various funds, accounts, and other vehicles that have strategies that are similar to, or that overlap with, our strategy, that had approximately $4.9 billion of total assets under management, excluding our assets but including $1.5 billion of accounts that do not employ financial leverage. Ellington makes available to our Manager all opportunities to acquire assets that it determines, in its reasonable and good faith judgment, based on our objectives, policies and strategies, and other relevant factors, to be appropriate for us in accordance with Ellington's written investment allocation policy, subject to the exception that we might not participate in each such opportunity, but will on an overall basis equitably participate with Ellington's other accounts in all such opportunities. Ellington's investment and risk management committee and its compliance committee (headed by its Chief Compliance Officer) are responsible for monitoring the administration of, and facilitating compliance with, Ellington's investment allocation procedures and policies.
Because Agency pass-through certificates, Agency and non-Agency CMOs, and certain other asset classes in which we invest are typically available only in specified quantities and are also targeted assets for certain other Ellington accounts,

Ellington often is not able to buy as much of any given asset as required to satisfy the needs of all its accounts. In these cases, Ellington's investment allocation procedures and policies typically allocate such assets to multiple accounts in proportion to their needs and available capital. Ellington may at times allocate opportunities on a preferential basis to accounts that are in a "start-up" or "ramp-up" phase. The policies permit departure from such proportional allocation under certain other circumstances, including, for example, when such allocation would result in an inefficiently small amount of the security being purchased for an account. In that case, the policies allow for a protocol of allocating assets so that, on an overall basis, each account is treated equitably. In addition, as part of these policies, we may be excluded from specified allocations of assets for tax, regulatory, risk management, or similar reasons.
Other policies of Ellington that our Manager applies to the management of our company include controls for:
Cross Transactions—defined as transactions between us or one of our subsidiaries, on the one hand, and an account (other than us or one of our subsidiaries) managed by Ellington or our Manager, on the other hand. It is Ellington's policy to engage in a cross transaction only when the transaction is in the best interests of, and is consistent with the objectives and policies of, both accounts involved in the transaction. Pursuant to the terms of the management agreement, our Manager may enter into cross transactions where it acts on our behalf and where Ellington or our Manager acts on behalf of the other party to the transaction; provided, however, that our Manager will not enter into any cross transactions on our behalf unless the cross transaction involves a "level one" asset for U.S. GAAP accounting purposes which is being crossed at market prices, or the cross transaction has received approval of a majority of our independent trustees. Although we believe such restrictions on our Manager's ability to engage in cross transactions on our behalf mitigate many risks, cross transactions, even at market prices, may potentially create a conflict of interest between our Manager's and our officers' duties to and interests in us and their duties to and interests in the other party. Subject to our Board of Trustees authorizing such action and upon written notice to our Manager, we may at any time revoke our consent to our Manager's executing cross transactions. Additionally, unless approved in advance by a majority of our independent trustees or pursuant to and in accordance with a policy that has been approved by a majority of our independent trustees, all cross transactions must be effected at the then-prevailing market prices. Pursuant to our Manager's current policies and procedures, assets for which there are no readily observable market prices may be purchased or sold in cross transactions (i) at prices based upon third-party bids received through auction, (ii) at the average of the highest bid and lowest offer quoted by third-party dealers, or (iii) according to another pricing methodology approved by our Manager's Chief Compliance Officer.
Principal Transactions—defined as transactions between Ellington or our Manager (or any related party of Ellington or our Manager, which includes employees of Ellington and our Manager and their families), on the one hand, and us or one of our subsidiaries, on the other hand. Certain cross transactions may also be considered principal transactions whenever our Manager or Ellington (or any related party of Ellington or our Manager, which includes employees of Ellington and our Manager and their families) have a substantial ownership interest in one of the transacting parties. Our Manager is only authorized to execute principal transactions with the prior approval of a majority of our independent trustees and in accordance with applicable law. Such prior approval includes approval of the pricing methodology to be used, including with respect to assets for which there are no readily observable market prices.
Investment in Other Ellington Accounts—pursuant to our management agreement, if we invest in any other investment fund or other investment for which Ellington or one of its affiliates receives management, origination, or structuring fees, the management fee payable by us to our Manager will be reduced by an amount equal to the applicable portion (as described in the management agreement) of any such management, origination, or structuring fees.
Split Price Executions—pursuant to our management agreement, our Manager is authorized to combine purchase or sale orders on our behalf together with orders for other accounts managed by Ellington, our Manager or their affiliates and allocate the securities or other assets so purchased or sold, on an average price basis or other fair and consistent basis, among such accounts.
To date, we have not entered into any cross transactions with other Ellington-managed accounts or principal transactions with Ellington, or invested in other Ellington accounts
Our Manager is authorized to follow very broad investment guidelines. Our independent trustees will periodically review our investment guidelines and our portfolio. However, our independent trustees generally will not review our proposed asset acquisitions, dispositions, or other management decisions. In addition, in conducting periodic reviews, our independent trustees will rely primarily on information provided to them by our Manager. Furthermore, our Manager may arrange for us to use complex strategies or to enter into complex transactions that may be difficult or impossible to unwind by the time they are reviewed by our independent trustees. Our Manager has great latitude within our broad investment guidelines to determine the types of assets it may decide are proper for purchase by us. The management agreement with our Manager does not restrict the ability of its officers and employees from engaging in other business ventures of any nature, whether or not such ventures are

competitive with our business. We may acquire assets from entities affiliated with our Manager, even where the assets were originated by such entities. Affiliates of our Manager may also provide services to entities in which we have invested.
Our executive officers and the officers and employees of our Manager are also officers and employees of Ellington, and we compete with other Ellington accounts for access to these individuals. We have not adopted a policy that expressly prohibits our trustees, officers, security holders, or affiliates from having a direct or indirect pecuniary interest in any asset to be acquired or disposed of by us or any of our subsidiaries or in any transaction to which we or any of our subsidiaries is a party or has an interest, nor do we have a policy that expressly prohibits any such persons from engaging for their own account in business activities of the types conducted by us. However, our code of business conduct and ethics contains a conflicts of interest policy that prohibits our trustees, officers, and employees, as well as employees of our Manager who provide services to us, from engaging in any transaction that involves an actual or apparent conflict of interest with us, absent approval by the Board of Trustees or except as expressly set forth above or as provided in the management agreement between us and our Manager. In addition, nothing in the management agreement binds or restricts our Manager or any of its affiliates, officers, or employees from buying, selling, or trading any securities or commodities for their own accounts or for the accounts of others for whom our Manager or any of its affiliates, officers, or employees may be acting.
Competition
In acquiring our assets, we compete with other mortgage REITs, specialty finance companies, savings and loan associations, banks, mortgage bankers, insurance companies, mutual funds, institutional investors, investment banking firms, financial institutions, governmental bodies, and other entities. Many of our competitors are significantly larger than us, have greater access to capital and other resources, and may have other advantages over us. Our competitors may include other investment vehicles managed by Ellington or its affiliates, including Ellington Financial LLC. In addition to existing companies, other companies may be organized for similar purposes in the future, including companies focused on purchasing mortgage assets. A proliferation of such companies may increase the competition for equity capital and thereby adversely affect the market price of our common shares. An increase in the competition for sources of funding could adversely affect the availability and cost of financing, and thereby adversely affect the market price of our common shares. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of assets, or pay higher prices, than we can.
In the face of this competition, we believe that our access to our Manager's and Ellington's professionals and their industry expertise may provide us with a competitive advantage, including helping us to identify appropriate assets for acquisition and the appropriate prices to pay for such assets, and thereby to compete more effectively for attractive asset acquisition opportunities. However, we may not be able to achieve our business goals or expectations as a result of the competitive risks that we face.
Operating and Regulatory Structure
Tax Requirements
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or "the Code," and have complied, and intend to continue to comply, with the provisions of the Code with respect thereto. Accordingly, we do not expect to be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our REIT taxable income that is currently distributed to our shareholders. REITs are subject to a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that they currently distribute at least 90% of their annual REIT taxable income, determined excluding any net capital gains and without regard to the deduction for dividends paid. We cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with such requirements. Failure to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year would cause us to be subject to U.S. federal income tax (and any applicable state and local taxes) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain federal, state, local, and non-U.S. taxes on our income. For example, if we form a TRS, the income generated by that subsidiary will be subject to U.S. federal, state, and local income tax. Any taxes paid by a TRS will reduce the cash available for distribution to our shareholders.
Investment Company Act Exclusion
Both we and our Operating Partnership are organized as holding companies and conduct our businesses primarily through wholly-owned subsidiaries of our Operating Partnership in a manner such that neither we nor our subsidiaries are subject to registration under the Investment Company Act. Under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act, a company is deemed to be an "investment company" if:
it is, or holds itself out as being, engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities (Section 3(a)(1)(A)); or

it is engaged or proposes to engage in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding, or trading in securities and does own or proposes to acquire "investment securities" having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (excluding U.S. government securities and cash) on an unconsolidated basis, or "the 40% Test" (Section 3(a)(1)(C)). "Investment securities" excludes U.S. government securities and securities of majority-owned subsidiaries that are not themselves investment companies and are not relying on the exception from the definition of investment company for private funds under Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act.
We believe we and our Operating Partnership will not be considered investment companies under Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act because we and our Operating Partnership do not engage primarily or hold ourselves out as being engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities. Rather, through wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiaries, we and our Operating Partnership are primarily engaged in the non-investment company businesses of these subsidiaries. In addition, we conduct our operations so that both we and our Operating Partnership satisfy the 40% Test.
Our Operating Partnership's direct and indirect subsidiaries, through which we operate our business, rely upon certain exclusions from the definition of investment company under the Investment Company Act including, in the case of our Operating Partnership's wholly-owned subsidiary, EARN Mortgage LLC, Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act. Section 3(c)(5)(C), as interpreted by the staff of the SEC, requires an entity to invest at least 55% of its assets in "mortgages and other liens on and interests in real estate," which we refer to as "qualifying real estate interests," and at least 80% of its assets in qualifying real estate interests plus "real estate-related assets." In satisfying the 55% requirement, the entity may treat agency securities issued with respect to an underlying pool of mortgage loans in which it holds all of the certificates issued by the pool as qualifying real estate interests. The CMOs we acquire will not be treated as qualifying real estate interests for purposes of the 55% requirement.
We also have formed, and may in the future form, certain other wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiaries that will invest in CMOs and, subject to our investment guidelines, other real estate-related assets. These subsidiaries will rely upon the exclusion from the definition of investment company under the Investment Company Act pursuant to Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act. Investments in subsidiaries that rely on the exclusions from the definition of investment company under 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act are considered investment securities for the purposes of the 40% Test. Therefore, our Operating Partnership's investments in its 3(c)(7) subsidiaries and its other investment securities cannot exceed 40% of the value of our Operating Partnership's total assets (excluding U.S. government securities and cash) on an unconsolidated basis.
We monitor our compliance with the 40% Test and the holdings of our subsidiaries to ensure that each of our subsidiaries is in compliance with an applicable exemption or exclusion from registration as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.
On August 31, 2011, the SEC published a concept release entitled "Companies Engaged in the Business of Acquiring Mortgages and Mortgage Related Instruments" (Investment Company Act Rel. No. 29778). This release notes that the SEC is reviewing the 3(c)(5)(C) exclusion relied upon by companies similar to us that invest in mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities. There can be no assurance that the laws and regulations governing the Investment Company Act status of companies similar to ours, or the guidance from the Division of Investment Management of the SEC regarding the treatment of assets as qualifying real estate assets or real estate-related assets, will not change in a manner that adversely affects our operations as a result of this review. To the extent that the SEC staff provides more specific guidance regarding any of the matters bearing upon our exclusion from the need to register under the Investment Company Act, we may be required to adjust our strategy accordingly. Any additional guidance from the SEC staff could provide additional flexibility to us, or it could further inhibit our ability to pursue the strategies that we have chosen. Furthermore, although we monitor the assets of EARN Mortgage LLC regularly, there can be no assurance that EARN Mortgage LLC will be able to maintain this exclusion from registration. In that case, our investment in EARN Mortgage LLC would be classified as an investment security, and we might not be able to maintain our overall exclusion from registering as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.
The loss of our exclusion from registration pursuant to the Investment Company Act could require us to restructure our operations, sell certain of our assets, or abstain from the purchase of certain assets, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. See "—Risk Factors—Maintenance of our exclusion from registration as an investment company under the Investment Company Act imposes significant limitations on our operations."
Investment Advisers Act of 1940
Both Ellington and our Manager are registered as investment advisers under the Advisers Act and are subject to the regulatory oversight of the Division of Investment Management of the SEC.

Staffing
We currently do not have any employees. All of our executive officers, and our partially dedicated personnel, which include our Chief Financial Officer, controllers, in-house legal counsel, investor relations professional, and internal audit staff, are employees of Ellington or one or more of its affiliates. See "—Management Agreement" above.
Additional Information
A copy of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available, free of charge, on our internet website at www.earnreit.com. All of these reports are made available on our internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and the charters of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees of our Board of Trustees are also available at www.earnreit.com and are available in print to any shareholder upon request in writing to Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT, c/o Investor Relations, 53 Forest Avenue, Old Greenwich, CT 06870. The information on our website is not, and shall not be deemed to be, a part of this report or incorporated into any other filing we make with the SEC.
All reports filed with the SEC may also be read and copied at the SEC's public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Further information regarding the operation of the public reference room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, all of our reports filed with or furnished to the SEC can be obtained at the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
If any of the following risks occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or not presently deemed material by us, may also impair our operations and performance. In connection with the forward-looking statements that appear in our periodic reports on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K, our Current Reports on Form 8-K and our other disclosure documents, you should also carefully review the cautionary statements referred to in such reports and other disclosure documents referred to under "Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements."
Risks Related To Our Business
The federal conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and related efforts, along with any changes in laws and regulations affecting the relationship between Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae and the U.S. Government, may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
The payments we receive on our Agency RMBS depend upon a steady stream of payments on the underlying mortgages and such payments are guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are government-sponsored enterprises, or "GSEs," but their guarantees are not backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. Ginnie Mae, which guarantees MBS backed by federally insured or guaranteed loans primarily consisting of loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration, or "FHA," or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs, or "VA," is part of a U.S. Government agency and its guarantees are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States.
In September 2008, in response to the deteriorating financial condition of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the U.S. Government placed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into the conservatorship of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, or "FHFA," their federal regulator, pursuant to its powers under The Federal Housing Finance Regulatory Reform Act of 2008, a part of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008. Under this conservatorship, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are required to reduce the amount of mortgage loans they own or for which they provide guarantees on Agency RMBS.
Shortly after Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were placed in federal conservatorship, the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury noted that the guarantee structure of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac required examination and that changes in the structures of the entities were necessary to reduce risk to the financial system. The future roles of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could be significantly reduced, and the nature of their guarantees could be considerably limited relative to historical measurements or even eliminated. The substantial financial assistance provided by the U.S. Government to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, especially in the course of their being placed into conservatorship and thereafter, together with the substantial financial assistance provided by the U.S. Government to the mortgage-related operations of other GSEs and government agencies, such as the FHA, VA, and Ginnie Mae, has stirred debate among many federal policymakers over the continued role of the U.S. Government in providing such financial support for the mortgage-related GSEs in particular, and for the mortgage and housing

markets in general. In fact, in February 2011, the U.S. Treasury released a white paper entitled "Reforming America's Housing Finance Market" in which the U.S. Treasury outlined three possible options for reforming the U.S. Government's role in housing finance. Under each option, the role of the U.S. Government in the mortgage market would be reduced. The FHFA's "Strategic Plan for Enterprise Conservatorships," as released on February 21, 2012 and updated in May 2014, sets forth three goals for the next phase of the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac conservatorships. These three goals are to (i) build a new infrastructure for the secondary mortgage market, (ii) gradually reduce Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's presence in the marketplace while simplifying and shrinking their operations, and (iii) maintain foreclosure prevention activities and credit availability for new and refinanced mortgages. Since the FHFA first released its strategic plan, there have been a number of other proposals introduced, both from industry groups and by the U.S. Congress, many of which could potentially increase private capital flows to the mortgage sector while reducing taxpayer risk. To date, no definitive legislation has been enacted with respect to a possible unwinding of the GSEs or a material reduction in their roles in the U.S. mortgage market, and it is not possible at this time to predict the scope and nature of the actions that the U.S. Government will ultimately take with respect to these GSEs.
As discussed above, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae could each be dissolved, and the U.S. Government could determine to stop providing liquidity support of any kind to the mortgage market. If Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae were eliminated, or their structures were to change radically, or the U.S. Government significantly reduced its support for any or all of them, we may be unable or significantly limited in our ability to acquire Agency RMBS, which would drastically reduce the amount and type of Agency RMBS available for purchase which, in turn, could materially adversely affect our ability to maintain our exclusion from registration as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. Moreover, any changes to the nature of the guarantees provided by, or laws affecting, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae could materially adversely affect the credit quality of the guarantees, could increase the risk of loss on purchases of Agency RMBS issued by these GSEs and could have broad adverse market implications for the Agency RMBS they currently guarantee. Any action that affects the credit quality of the guarantees provided by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae could materially adversely affect the value of our Agency RMBS. In addition, any market uncertainty that arises from such proposed changes could have a similar impact on us and our Agency RMBS.
In addition, we rely on our Agency RMBS as collateral for our financings under the reverse repos that we enter into. Any decline in their value, or perceived market uncertainty about their value, would make it more difficult for us to obtain financing on our Agency RMBS on acceptable terms or at all, or to maintain compliance with the terms of any financing transactions
Interest rate mismatches between our assets and our borrowings may reduce our income during periods of changing interest rates, and increases in interest rates could adversely affect the value of our assets.
Some of our assets are fixed rate securities or have a fixed rate component (such as RMBS backed by hybrid ARMs). This means that the interest we earn on these assets will not vary over time based upon changes in a short-term interest rate index. Although the interest we earn on our RMBS backed by ARMs generally will adjust for changing interest rates, such interest rate adjustments may not occur as quickly as the interest rate adjustments to any related borrowings, and such interest rate adjustments will generally be subject to interest rate caps, which potentially could cause such RMBS to acquire many of the characteristics of fixed rate securities if interest rates were to rise above the cap levels. We generally fund our targeted assets with borrowings whose interest rates reset frequently, and as a result we generally have an interest rate mismatch between our assets and liabilities. While our interest rate hedges are intended to mitigate a portion of this mismatch, the use of interest rate hedges also introduces the risk of other interest rate mismatches and exposures, as will the use of other financing techniques. Additionally, to the extent cash flows from RMBS we hold are reinvested in new RMBS, the spread between the yields of the new RMBS and available borrowing rates may decline, which could reduce our net interest margin or result in losses.
Fixed income assets, including many RMBS, typically decline in value if interest rates increase. If long-term rates were to increase significantly, not only would the market value of these assets be expected to decline, but these assets could lengthen in duration because borrowers would be less likely to prepay their mortgages.
Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations, and other factors beyond our control. The U.S. Federal Reserve, or the "Federal Reserve," increased the target range for the federal funds rate in December 2015, which was the first such increase since 2006; it increased the target range again in December 2016, and has indicated that further interest rate increases may occur in the near future.
Subject to maintaining our qualification as a REIT, while we opportunistically hedge our exposure to changes in interest rates, there can be no assurances that our hedges will be successful, or that we will be able to enter into or maintain such hedges. As a result, interest rate fluctuations can cause significant losses, reductions in income, and can limit the cash available to pay dividends to our shareholders.

Certain actions by the U.S. Federal Reserve could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
In September 2012, the U.S. Federal Reserve, or "Federal Reserve," announced a third round of quantitative easing, or "QE3," which was an open-ended program designed to expand the Federal Reserve's holdings of long-term securities by purchasing, at the time, an additional $40 billion of Agency RMBS per month until key economic indicators show sufficient signs of improvement.
Since December 2013, the Federal Reserve announced and completed eight incremental reductions in its purchases of Agency RMBS and U.S. Treasury securities under its accommodative monetary policies, and concluded its QE3 asset buying program at the end of October 2014. However, the Federal Reserve continues to reinvest principal payments from its U.S. Treasury security and Agency RMBS holdings, and uncertainty surrounds the Federal Reserve's timeline to curtail such reinvestment. In addition, the Federal Reserve recently increased the target range for the federal funds rate, and has indicated that further interest rate increases may occur in the near future. See "—Increases in interest rates could adversely affect the value of our assets and cause our interest expense to increase, and increase the risk of default on our assets which could result in reduced earnings or losses and negatively affect our profitability as well as the cash available for distribution to shareholders." Should the U.S. economy begin to deteriorate, the Federal Reserve could decide to reinstate its asset purchase program or institute other measures designed to reduce interest rates. These measures could lead to a flattening in the yield curve, increased prepayment rates (resulting from lower long-term interest rates, including mortgage rates), and a narrowing of our net interest margin.
Prepayment rates can change, adversely affecting the performance of our assets.
The frequency at which prepayments (including both voluntary prepayments by borrowers and liquidations due to defaults and foreclosures) occur on mortgage loans underlying our RMBS, is affected by a variety of factors, including the prevailing level of interest rates as well as economic, demographic, tax, social, legal, and other factors. Generally, borrowers tend to prepay their mortgages when prevailing mortgage rates fall below the interest rates on their mortgage loans. When borrowers prepay their mortgage loans at rates that are faster or slower than expected, it results in prepayments that are faster or slower than expected on the related RMBS. These faster or slower than expected payments may adversely affect our profitability.
We may purchase securities or loans that have a higher interest rate than the then-prevailing market interest rate. In exchange for this higher interest rate, we may pay a premium to par value to acquire the security or loan. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, we amortize this premium as an expense over the expected term of the security or loan based on our prepayment assumptions. If a security or loan is prepaid in whole or in part at a faster than expected rate, however, we must expense all or a part of the remaining unamortized portion of the premium that was paid at the time of the purchase, which will adversely affect our profitability.
We also may purchase securities or loans that have a lower interest rate than the then-prevailing market interest rate. In exchange for this lower interest rate, we may pay a discount to par value to acquire the security or loan. We accrete this discount as income over the expected term of the security or loan based on our prepayment assumptions. If a security or loan is prepaid at a slower than expected rate, however, we must accrete the remaining portion of the discount at a slower than expected rate. This will extend the expected life of investment portfolio and result in a lower than expected yield on securities and loans purchased at a discount to par.
Prepayment rates generally increase when interest rates fall and decrease when interest rates rise. Since many RMBS, especially fixed rate RMBS, will be discount securities when interest rates are high, and will be premium securities when interest rates are low, these RMBS may be adversely affected by changes in prepayments in any interest rate environment. Prepayment rates are also affected by factors not directly tied to interest rates, and are difficult to predict. Prepayments can also occur when borrowers sell their properties, or when borrowers default on their mortgages and the mortgages are prepaid from the proceeds of a foreclosure sale of the underlying property and/or from the proceeds of a mortgage insurance policy or other guarantee. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will generally, among other conditions, purchase mortgages that are 120 days or more delinquent from the Agency RMBS pools that they have issued when the cost of guaranteed payments to security holders, including advances of interest at the security coupon rate, exceeds the cost of holding the non-performing loans in their portfolios. Consequently, prepayment rates also may be affected by conditions in the housing and financial markets, which may result in increased delinquencies on mortgage loans. Prepayment rates can also be affected by actions of the GSEs and their cost of capital, general economic conditions, and the relative interest rates on fixed and adjustable rate loans. Additionally, changes in the GSEs' decisions as to when to repurchase delinquent loans can materially impact prepayment rates on Agency RMBS.
The adverse effects of prepayments may impact us in various ways. First, particular investments may experience outright losses, as in the case of IOs and IIOs in an environment of faster actual or anticipated prepayments. Second, particular investments may underperform relative to any hedges that our Manager may have constructed for these assets, resulting in a

loss to us. In particular, prepayments (at par) may limit the potential upside of many RMBS to their principal or par amounts, whereas their corresponding hedges often have the potential for unlimited loss. Furthermore, to the extent that faster prepayment rates are due to lower interest rates, the principal payments received from prepayments will tend to be reinvested in lower-yielding assets, which may reduce our income in the long run. Therefore, if actual prepayment rates differ from anticipated prepayment rates our business, financial condition and results of operations and ability to pay dividends to our shareholders could be materially adversely affected.
Interest rate caps on the ARMs and hybrid ARMs that back our RMBS may reduce our net interest margin during periods of rising or high interest rates.
ARMs and hybrid ARMs are typically subject to periodic and lifetime interest rate caps. Periodic interest rate caps limit the amount an interest rate can increase during any given period. Lifetime interest rate caps limit the amount an interest rate can increase through the maturity of the loan. Our borrowings typically are not subject to similar restrictions. Accordingly, in a period of rapidly increasing interest rates, our financing costs could increase without limitation while caps could limit the interest we earn on our RMBS backed by ARMs and hybrid ARMs. This problem is magnified for ARMs and hybrid ARMs that are not fully indexed because such periodic interest rate caps prevent the coupon on the security from fully reaching the specified rate in one reset. Further, some ARMs and hybrid ARMs may be subject to periodic payment caps that result in a portion of the interest being deferred and added to the principal outstanding. As a result, we may receive less cash income on RMBS backed by ARMs and hybrid ARMs than necessary to pay interest on our related borrowings. Interest rate caps on RMBS backed by ARMs and hybrid ARMs could reduce our net interest margin if interest rates were to increase beyond the level of the caps, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
Mortgage loan modification programs and future legislative action may adversely affect the value of, and the returns on, our targeted assets.
The U.S. Government, through the U.S. Treasury, FHA, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or "FDIC," commenced implementation of programs designed to provide homeowners with assistance in avoiding mortgage loan foreclosures, including the Home Affordable Refinance Program, or "HARP," which allows borrowers who are current on their mortgage payments to refinance and reduce their monthly mortgage payments at loan-to-value ratios up to 125% without new mortgage insurance. The programs may involve, among other things, the modification of mortgage loans to reduce the principal amount of the loans or the rate of interest payable on the loans, or to extend the payment terms of the loans.
Loan modification and refinance programs may adversely affect the performance of Agency and non-Agency RMBS. In the case of non-Agency RMBS, a significant number of loan modifications with respect to a given security, including those related to principal forgiveness and coupon reduction, could negatively impact the realized yields and cash flows on such security. In addition, it is also likely that loan modifications would result in increased prepayments on some RMBS. See above "—Prepayment rates can change, adversely affecting the performance of our assets," for information relating to the impact of prepayments on our business.
The U.S. Congress and various state and local legislatures are considering, and in the future may consider, mortgage-related legislation that would affect our business, including legislation that would permit limited assignee liability for certain violations in the mortgage loan origination process, and legislation that would allow judicial modification of loan principal in the event of personal bankruptcy. We cannot predict whether or in what form Congress or the various state and local legislatures may enact legislation affecting our business or whether any such legislation will require us to change our practices or make changes in our portfolio in the future. These changes, if required, could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders, particularly if we make such changes in response to new or amended laws, regulations or ordinances in any state where we acquire a significant portion of our mortgage loans, or if such changes result in us being held responsible for any violations in the mortgage loan origination process.
The existing loan modification programs, together with future legislative or regulatory actions, including possible amendments to the bankruptcy laws, which result in the modification of outstanding residential mortgage loans and/or changes in the requirements necessary to qualify for refinancing mortgage loans with Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae, may adversely affect the value of, and the returns on, our assets, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
Difficult conditions in the mortgage and residential real estate markets as well as general market concerns may adversely affect the value of the assets in which we invest and such conditions may persist for the foreseeable future.
Our business is materially affected by conditions in the residential mortgage market, the residential real estate market, the financial markets, and the economy, including inflation, energy costs, unemployment, geopolitical issues, concerns over the

creditworthiness of governments worldwide and the stability of the global banking system. In particular, the residential mortgage market in the U.S. has experienced a variety of difficulties and challenging economic conditions in the past, including defaults, credit losses, and liquidity concerns. Certain commercial banks, investment banks, insurance companies, and mortgage-related investment vehicles incurred extensive losses from exposure to the residential mortgage market as a result of these difficulties and conditions. These factors have impacted investor perception of the risks associated with RMBS, other real estate-related securities and various other asset classes in which we may invest. As a result, values for RMBS, other real estate-related securities and various other asset classes in which we may invest have experienced, and may in the future experience, significant volatility.
In the aftermath of the financial crisis, homeowner access to residential mortgage loans has been substantially limited. Lending standards are significantly more stringent than in past periods, and access to many mortgage products has been severely curtailed or eliminated. This financing limitation has had an impact on new demand for homes, has lowered homeownership rates and impacted home price performance. There is a strong correlation between home price depreciation and mortgage loan delinquencies. Any deterioration of the mortgage market and investor perception of the risks associated with RMBS, residential mortgage loans, real estate-related securities, and various other assets that we acquire could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
Our non-Agency RMBS assets include subordinated and lower-rated securities that generally have greater risks of loss than senior and higher-rated securities.
Certain non-Agency RMBS securities that we acquire are deemed by rating agencies to have substantial vulnerability to default in payment of interest and/or principal. Other securities we acquire have the lowest quality ratings or are unrated. Many securities that we acquire are subordinated in cash flow priority to other more "senior" securities of the same securitization. The exposure to defaults on the underlying mortgages is severely magnified in subordinated securities. Certain subordinated securities ("first loss securities") absorb all losses from default before any other class of securities is at risk. Such securities therefore are considered to be highly speculative investments. Also, the risk of declining real estate values, in particular, is amplified in subordinated RMBS, as are the risks associated with possible changes in the market's perception of the entity issuing or guaranteeing them, or by changes in government regulations and tax policies. Accordingly, the subordinated and lower-rated (or unrated) securities in which we invest may experience significant price and performance volatility relative to more senior or higher-rated securities, and they are subject to greater risk of loss than more senior or higher-rated securities which, if realized, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
Less stringent underwriting guidelines and the resultant potential for delinquencies or defaults on certain mortgage loans could lead to losses on many of the non-Agency RMBS we hold.
Many, if not most, of the non-Agency RMBS in which we invest are collateralized by Alt-A and subprime mortgage loans, which are mortgage loans that were originated using less stringent underwriting guidelines than those used in underwriting prime mortgage loans (mortgage loans that generally conform to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac underwriting guidelines). These underwriting guidelines were more permissive as to borrower credit history or credit score, borrower debt-to-income ratio, loan-to-value ratio, and/or as to documentation (such as whether and to what extent borrower income was required to be disclosed or verified). In addition, even when specific underwriting guidelines were represented by loan originators as having been used in connection with the origination of mortgage loans, these guidelines were in many cases not followed as a result of aggressive lending practices, fraud (including borrower or appraisal fraud), or other factors. Mortgage loans that were underwritten pursuant to less stringent or looser underwriting guidelines, or that were poorly underwritten to their stated guidelines, have experienced, and should be expected to experience in the future, substantially higher rates of delinquencies, defaults, and foreclosures than those experienced by mortgage loans that were underwritten in a manner more consistent with Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac guidelines. Thus, because of the higher delinquency rates and losses associated with Alt-A and subprime mortgage loans, the performance of RMBS backed by Alt-A and subprime mortgage loans that we may acquire could be correspondingly adversely affected, which could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
Investments in second lien mortgage loans could subject us to increased risk of losses.
We may invest in second-lien mortgage loans or RMBS backed by such loans. If a borrower defaults on a second lien mortgage loan or on its senior debt (i.e., a first-lien loan, in the case of a residential mortgage loan), or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, such loan will be satisfied only after all senior debt is paid in full. As a result, if we invest in second-lien mortgage loans and the borrower defaults, we may lose all or a significant part of our investment.

The principal and interest payments on our non-Agency RMBS are not guaranteed by any entity, including any government entity or GSE, and therefore are subject to increased risks, including credit risk.
Our portfolio includes non-Agency RMBS which are backed by residential mortgage loans that do not conform to the Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac underwriting guidelines, including subprime, manufactured housing, Alt-A, and prime jumbo mortgage loans. Consequently, the principal and interest on non-Agency RMBS, unlike those on Agency RMBS, are not guaranteed by GSEs such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac or, in the case of Ginnie Mae, the U.S. Government.
Non-Agency RMBS are subject to many of the risks of the respective underlying mortgage loans. A residential mortgage loan is typically secured by single-family residential property and is subject to risks of delinquency and foreclosure and risk of loss. The ability of a borrower to repay a loan secured by a residential property is dependent upon the income or assets of the borrower. A number of factors, including a general economic downturn, unemployment, acts of God, terrorism, social unrest, and civil disturbances, may impair borrowers' abilities to repay their mortgage loans. In periods following home price declines, "strategic defaults" (decisions by borrowers to default on their mortgage loans despite having the ability to pay) also may become more prevalent.
In the event of defaults under mortgage loans backing any of our non-Agency RMBS, we will bear a risk of loss of principal to the extent of any deficiency between the value of the collateral and the principal and accrued interest of the mortgage loan. Additionally, in the event of the bankruptcy of a mortgage loan borrower, the mortgage loan to such borrower will be deemed to be secured only to the extent of the value of the underlying collateral at the time of bankruptcy (as determined by the bankruptcy court), and the lien securing the mortgage loan will be subject to the avoidance powers of the bankruptcy trustee or debtor-in-possession to the extent the lien is unenforceable under state law. Foreclosure of a mortgage loan can be an expensive and lengthy process which could have a substantial negative effect on our anticipated return on the foreclosed mortgage loan. If borrowers default on the mortgage loans backing our non-Agency RMBS and we are unable to recover any resulting loss through the foreclosure process, our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders, could be materially adversely affected.
Residential mortgage loans, including subprime, non-performing, and sub-performing residential mortgage loans, are subject to increased risks.
We may acquire and manage residential mortgage loans. Residential mortgage loans, including subprime, non-performing, and sub-performing mortgage loans, are subject to increased risk of loss. Unlike Agency RMBS, residential mortgage loans generally are not guaranteed by the U.S. Government or any GSE, though in some cases they may benefit from private mortgage insurance. Additionally, by directly acquiring residential mortgage loans, we do not receive the structural credit enhancements that benefit senior tranches of RMBS. A residential mortgage loan is directly exposed to losses resulting from default. Therefore, the value of the underlying property, the creditworthiness and financial position of the borrower, and the priority and enforceability of the lien will significantly impact the value of such mortgage loan. In the event of a foreclosure, we may assume direct ownership of the underlying real estate. The liquidation proceeds upon sale of such real estate may not be sufficient to recover our cost basis in the loan, and any costs or delays involved in the foreclosure or liquidation process may increase losses.
Residential mortgage loans are also subject to property damage caused by hazards, such as earthquakes or environmental hazards, not covered by standard property insurance policies or "special hazard risk," and to reduction in a borrower's mortgage debt by a bankruptcy court, or "bankruptcy risk." In addition, claims may be assessed against us on account of our position as a mortgage holder or property owner, including assignee liability, environmental hazards, and other liabilities. We could also be responsible for property taxes. In some cases, these liabilities may be "recourse liabilities" or may otherwise lead to losses in excess of the purchase price of the related mortgage or property.
To the extent that due diligence is conducted on potential assets, such due diligence may not reveal all of the risks associated with such assets and may not reveal other weaknesses in such assets, which could lead to losses.
Before making an investment, our Manager may decide to conduct (either directly or using third parties) certain due diligence. There can be no assurance that our Manager will conduct any specific level of due diligence, or that, among other things, our Manager's due diligence processes will uncover all relevant facts or that any purchase will be successful, which could result in losses on these assets, which, in turn, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.

We rely on mortgage servicers for our loss mitigation efforts, and we also may engage in our own loss mitigation efforts with respect to whole mortgage loans and loan pools we may purchase. Such loss mitigation efforts may be unsuccessful or not cost effective.
We depend on a variety of services provided by third-party service providers related to our non-Agency RMBS and whole mortgage loans and loan pools we may acquire. We rely on the mortgage servicers who service the mortgage loans backing our non-Agency RMBS to, among other things, collect principal and interest payments on the underlying mortgages and perform loss mitigation services. Our mortgage servicers and other service providers to our non-Agency RMBS, such as trustees, bond insurance providers and custodians, may not perform in a manner that promotes our interests. In addition, legislation that has been enacted or that may be enacted in order to reduce or prevent foreclosures through, among other things, loan modifications, may reduce the value of mortgage loans backing our non-Agency RMBS or whole mortgage loans that we acquire. Mortgage servicers may be incentivized by the U.S. Government to pursue such loan modifications, as well as forbearance plans and other actions intended to prevent foreclosure, even if such loan modifications and other actions are not in the best interests of the beneficial owners of the mortgage loans. In addition to legislation that creates financial incentives for mortgage loan servicers to modify loans and take other actions that are intended to prevent foreclosures, legislation has also been adopted that creates a safe harbor from liability to creditors for servicers that undertake loan modifications and other actions that are intended to prevent foreclosures. Finally, legislation has been adopted that delays the initiation or completion of foreclosure proceedings on specified types of residential mortgage loans or otherwise limit the ability of mortgage servicers to take actions that may be essential to preserve the value of the mortgage loans underlying the mortgage servicing rights. Any such limitations are likely to cause delayed or reduced collections from mortgagors and generally increase servicing costs. As a result of these legislative actions, the mortgage loan servicers on which we rely may not perform in our best interests or up to our expectations. If our third-party service providers including mortgage servicers do not perform as expected, our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders may be materially adversely affected.
In addition, if we purchase pools of whole mortgage loans, we may engage in our own loss mitigation efforts over and above the efforts of the mortgage servicers, including more hands-on mortgage servicer oversight and management, borrower refinancing solicitations, as well as other efforts. Our loss mitigation efforts may be unsuccessful in limiting delinquencies, defaults and losses, or may not be cost effective, which may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
We may be affected by deficiencies in foreclosure practices of third parties, as well as related delays in the foreclosure process.
One of the biggest risks overhanging the RMBS market has been uncertainty around the timing and ability of servicers to foreclose on defaulted loans, so that they can liquidate the underlying properties and ultimately pass the liquidation proceeds through to RMBS holders. Given the magnitude of the housing crisis, and in response to the well-publicized failures of many servicers to follow proper foreclosure procedures (such as involving "robo-signing"), mortgage servicers are being held to much higher foreclosure-related documentation standards than they previously were. However, because many mortgages have been transferred and assigned multiple times (and by means of varying assignment procedures) throughout the origination, warehouse, and securitization processes, mortgage servicers are generally having much more difficulty furnishing the requisite documentation to initiate or complete foreclosures. This leads to stalled or suspended foreclosure proceedings, and ultimately additional foreclosure-related costs. Foreclosure-related delays also tend to increase ultimate loan loss severities as a result of property deterioration, amplified legal and other costs, and other factors. Many factors delaying foreclosure, such as borrower lawsuits and judicial backlog and scrutiny, are outside of a servicer's control and have delayed, and will likely continue to delay, foreclosure processing in both judicial states (where foreclosures require court involvement) and non-judicial states. The extension of foreclosure timelines also increases the inventory backlog of distressed homes on the market and creates greater uncertainty about housing prices. The concerns about deficiencies in foreclosure practices of servicers and related delays in the foreclosure process may impact our loss assumptions and affect the values of, and our returns on, our investments in RMBS and residential whole loans.
Sellers of the mortgage loans that underlie the non-Agency RMBS in which we invest may be unable to repurchase defective mortgage loans, which could have a material adverse effect on the value of the loans held by the trust that issued the RMBS and could cause shortfalls in the payments due on the RMBS.
Sellers of mortgage loans to the trusts that issued the non-Agency RMBS in which we invest made various representations and warranties related to the mortgage loans sold by them to the trusts that issued the RMBS. If a seller fails to cure a material breach of its representations and warranties with respect to any mortgage loan in a timely manner, then the trustee or the servicer of the loans may have the right to require that the seller repurchase the defective mortgage loan (or in some cases substitute a performing mortgage loan). It is possible, however, that for financial or other reasons, the seller either may not be

capable of repurchasing defective mortgage loans, or may dispute the validity of or otherwise resist its obligation to repurchase defective mortgage loans. The inability or unwillingness of a seller to repurchase defective mortgage loans from a non-Agency RMBS trust in which we invest would likely cause higher rates of delinquencies, defaults and losses for the mortgage loans backing such non-Agency RMBS, and ultimately greater losses for our investment in such non-Agency RMBS.
If we acquire and subsequently resell any whole mortgage loans, we may be required to repurchase such loans or indemnify purchasers if we breach representations and warranties.
If we acquire and subsequently resell any whole mortgage loans, we would generally be required to make customary representations and warranties about such loans to the loan purchaser. Our residential mortgage loan sale agreements and terms of any securitizations into which we sell loans will generally require us to repurchase or substitute loans in the event we breach a representation or warranty given to the loan purchaser. In addition, we may be required to repurchase loans as a result of borrower fraud or in the event of early payment default on a mortgage loan. The remedies available to a purchaser of mortgage loans are generally broader than those available to us against an originating broker or correspondent. Repurchased loans are typically worth only a fraction of the original price. Significant repurchase activity could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
We could be subject to liability for potential violations of predatory lending laws, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
Residential mortgage loan originators and servicers are required to comply with various federal, state and local laws and regulations, including anti-predatory lending laws and laws and regulations imposing certain restrictions on requirements on high cost loans. Failure of residential mortgage loan originators or servicers to comply with these laws, to the extent any of their residential mortgage loans become part of our mortgage-related assets, could subject us, as an assignee or purchaser of the related residential mortgage loans, to monetary penalties and could result in the borrowers rescinding the affected residential mortgage loans. Lawsuits have been brought in various states making claims against assignees or purchasers of high cost loans for violations of state law. Named defendants in these cases have included numerous participants within the secondary mortgage market. If the loans are found to have been originated in violation of predatory or abusive lending laws, we could incur losses, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
Our real estate-related assets are subject to the risks associated with real property.
We own assets secured by real estate and may own real estate directly in the future, either through direct acquisitions or upon a default of mortgage loans. Real estate assets are subject to various risks, including:
continued declines in the value of real estate;
acts of God, including earthquakes, floods, and other natural disasters, which may result in uninsured losses;
acts of war or terrorism, including the consequences of terrorist attacks, such as those that occurred on September 11, 2001;
adverse changes in national and local economic and market conditions;
changes in governmental laws and regulations, fiscal policies and zoning ordinances and the related costs of compliance with laws and regulations, fiscal policies and zoning ordinances;
costs of remediation and liabilities associated with environmental conditions such as indoor mold;
potential liabilities for other legal actions related to property ownership including tort claims; and
the potential for uninsured or under-insured property losses.
The occurrence of any of the foregoing or similar events may reduce our return from an affected property or asset and, consequently, materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
We may be exposed to environmental liabilities with respect to properties in which we have an interest.
In the course of our business, we may take title to real estate, and, if we do take title, we could be subject to environmental liabilities with respect to these properties. In such a circumstance, we may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage, personal injury, investigation, and clean-up costs incurred by these parties in connection with environmental contamination, or may be required to investigate or clean up hazardous or toxic substances, or chemical releases at a property. The costs associated with investigation or remediation activities could be substantial. In addition, the presence of hazardous substances may adversely affect an owner's ability to sell real estate or borrow using real estate as collateral. To the

extent that an owner of an underlying property becomes liable for removal costs, the ability of the owner to make debt payments may be reduced, which in turn may materially adversely affect the value of the relevant mortgage-related assets held by us.
We rely on analytical models and other data to analyze potential asset acquisition and disposition opportunities and to manage our portfolio. Such models and other data may be incorrect, misleading or incomplete, which could cause us to purchase assets that do not meet our expectations or to make asset management decisions that are not in line with our strategy.
Our Manager relies on the analytical models (both proprietary and third-party models) of Ellington and information and data supplied by third parties. These models and data may be used to value assets or potential asset acquisitions and dispositions and also in connection with our asset management activities. If Ellington's models and data prove to be incorrect, misleading, or incomplete, any decisions made in reliance thereon could expose us to potential risks. Our Manager's reliance on Ellington's models and data may induce it to purchase certain assets at prices that are too high, to sell certain other assets at prices that are too low, or to miss favorable opportunities altogether. Similarly, any hedging activities that are based on faulty models and data may prove to be unsuccessful.
Some of the risks of relying on analytical models and third-party data include the following:
collateral cash flows and/or liability structures may be incorrectly modeled in all or only certain scenarios, or may be modeled based on simplifying assumptions that lead to errors;
information about assets or the underlying collateral may be incorrect, incomplete, or misleading;
asset, collateral or RMBS historical performance (such as historical prepayments, defaults, cash flows, etc.) may be incorrectly reported, or subject to interpretation (e.g., different RMBS issuers may report delinquency statistics based on different definitions of what constitutes a delinquent loan); and
asset, collateral or RMBS information may be outdated, in which case the models may contain incorrect assumptions as to what has occurred since the date information was last updated.
Some models, such as prepayment models or default models, may be predictive in nature. The use of predictive models has inherent risks. For example, such models may incorrectly forecast future behavior, leading to potential losses. In addition, the predictive models used by our Manager may differ substantially from those models used by other market participants, with the result that valuations based on these predictive models may be substantially higher or lower for certain assets than actual market prices. Furthermore, because predictive models are usually constructed based on historical data supplied by third parties, the success of relying on such models may depend heavily on the accuracy and reliability of the supplied historical data, and, in the case of predicting performance in scenarios with little or no historical precedent (such as extreme broad-based declines in home prices, or deep economic recessions or depressions), such models must employ greater degrees of extrapolation and are therefore more speculative and of more limited reliability.
All valuation models rely on correct market data inputs. If incorrect market data is entered into even a well-founded valuation model, the resulting valuations will be incorrect. However, even if market data is input correctly, "model prices" will often differ substantially from market prices, especially for securities with complex characteristics or whose values are particularly sensitive to various factors. If our market data inputs are incorrect or our model prices differ substantially from market prices, our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders could be materially adversely affected.
Valuations of some of our assets are inherently uncertain, may be based on estimates, may fluctuate over short periods of time, and may differ from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these assets existed.
The values of some of the assets in our portfolio are not readily determinable. We value these assets monthly at fair value, as determined in good faith by our Manager, subject to the oversight of our Manager's valuation committee. Because such valuations are inherently uncertain, may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates, our Manager's determinations of fair value may differ from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these assets existed or from the prices at which trades occur. Furthermore, we may not obtain third party valuations for all of our assets. Changes in the fair value of our assets directly impact our net income through recording unrealized appreciation or depreciation of our investments and derivative instruments, and so our Manager's determination of fair value has a material impact on our net income.
While in many cases our Manager's determination of the fair value of our assets is based on valuations provided by third-party dealers and pricing services, our Manager can and does value assets based upon its judgment and such valuations may differ from those provided by third-party dealers and pricing services. Valuations of certain assets are often difficult to obtain or

are unreliable. In general, dealers and pricing services heavily disclaim their valuations. Additionally, dealers may claim to furnish valuations only as an accommodation and without special compensation, and so they may disclaim any and all liability for any direct, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of any inaccuracy or incompleteness in valuations, including any act of negligence or breach of any warranty. Depending on the complexity and illiquidity of an asset, valuations of the same asset can vary substantially from one dealer or pricing service to another. Higher valuations of our assets have the effect of increasing the amount of management fees we pay to our Manager. Therefore, conflicts of interest exist because our Manager is involved in the determination of the fair value of our assets.
Our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders could be materially adversely affected if our Manager's fair value determinations of these assets were materially different from the values that would exist if a ready market existed for these assets.
The lack of liquidity in our assets may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
Certain of the assets and other instruments we acquire are not publicly traded, including privately placed RMBS. As such, these assets may be subject to legal and other restrictions on resale, transfer, pledge or other disposition, or will otherwise be less liquid than publicly-traded securities. Other assets that we acquire, while publicly traded, have limited liquidity on account of their complexity, turbulent market conditions, or other factors. In addition, mortgage-related assets from time to time have experienced extended periods of illiquidity, including during times of financial stress (such as during the 2008 financial crisis), which is often the time that liquidity is most needed. Illiquid assets typically experience greater price volatility, because a ready market does not exist, and they can be more difficult to value or sell if the need arises. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we have previously recorded our assets. We may also face other restrictions on our ability to liquidate any assets for which we or our Manager has or could be attributed with material non-public information. Furthermore, assets that are illiquid are more difficult to finance, and to the extent that we finance assets that are or become illiquid, we may lose that financing or have it reduced. If we are unable to sell our assets at favorable prices or at all, it could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
We are highly dependent on information systems and system failures could significantly disrupt our business, which may, in turn, materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
Our business is highly dependent on communications and information systems. Any failure or interruption of our systems or cyber-attacks or security breaches of our networks or systems could cause delays or other problems in our securities trading activities, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders. In addition, we also face the risk of operational failure, termination or capacity constraints of any of the third parties with which we do business or that facilitate our business activities, including clearing agents or other financial intermediaries we use to facilitate our securities transactions, if their respective systems experience failure, interruption, cyber-attacks, or security breaches.
Computer malware, viruses, and computer hacking and phishing attacks have become more prevalent in the financial services industry and may occur on our systems in the future. We rely heavily on our financial, accounting and other data processing systems. Although we have not detected a breach to date, financial services institutions have reported breaches of their systems, some of which have been significant. Even with all reasonable security efforts, not every breach can be prevented or even detected. It is possible that we have experienced an undetected breach, and it is likely that other financial institutions have experienced more breaches than have been detected and reported. There is no assurance that we, or the third parties that facilitate our business activities, have not or will not experience a breach. It is difficult to determine what, if any, negative impact may directly result from any specific interruption or cyber-attacks or security breaches of our networks or systems (or the networks or systems of third parties that facilitate our business activities) or any failure to maintain performance, reliability and security of our technical infrastructure, but such computer malware, viruses, and computer hacking and phishing attacks may negatively affect our operations.
Our access to financing sources, which may not be available on favorable terms, or at all, may be limited, and this may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
We depend upon the availability of adequate capital and financing sources to fund our operations. Our lenders are primarily large global financial institutions, with exposures both to global financial markets and to more localized conditions. For example, several of our lenders are large European-based banks whose financial conditions have still not fully recovered

from the 2008 financial crisis. In addition to borrowing from large banks, we borrow from smaller non-bank financial institutions as well. Whether because of a subsequent global or local financial crisis or other circumstances, if one or more of our lenders experiences severe financial difficulties, they or other lenders could become unwilling or unable to provide us with financing, could increase the costs of that financing, or could become insolvent, as was the case with Lehman Brothers in 2008. Moreover, we are currently party to short-term borrowings (in the form of repurchase agreements) and there can be no assurance that we will be able to replace these borrowings, or "roll" them, as they mature on a continuous basis and it may be more difficult for us to obtain debt financing on favorable terms, or at all. In addition, if regulatory capital requirements imposed on our lenders change, they may be required to limit, or increase the cost of, the financing they provide to us. In general, this could potentially increase our financing costs and reduce our liquidity or require us to sell assets at an inopportune time or price. Consequently, depending on market conditions at the relevant time, we may have to rely on additional equity issuances to meet our capital and financing needs, which may be dilutive to our shareholders, or we may have to rely on less efficient forms of debt financing that consume a larger portion of our cash flow from operations, thereby reducing funds available for our operations, future business opportunities, cash distributions to our shareholders, and other purposes. We cannot assure you that we will have access to such equity or debt capital on favorable terms (including, without limitation, cost and term) at the desired times, or at all, which may cause us to curtail our asset acquisition activities and/or dispose of assets, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
Increases in interest rates could adversely affect the value of our assets and cause our interest expense to increase, and increase the risk of default on our assets which could result in reduced earnings or losses and negatively affect our profitability as well as the cash available for distribution to shareholders.
Our operating results will depend in large part on the difference between the income from our assets, net of credit losses, and financing costs. We anticipate that, in many cases, the income from our assets will respond more slowly to interest rate fluctuations than the cost of our borrowings. Consequently, changes in interest rates, particularly short-term interest rates, to the extent not offset by our interest rate hedges, may significantly influence our financial results.
We use leverage in executing our business strategy, which may adversely affect the return on our assets and may reduce cash available for distribution to our shareholders, as well as increase losses when economic conditions are unfavorable.
We use leverage to finance our investment activities and to enhance our financial returns. Currently, all of our leverage is in the form of short-term repurchase agreement financings for our RMBS assets. Other forms of leverage we may use in the future include credit facilities, including term loans and revolving credit facilities.
Through the use of leverage, we may acquire positions with market exposure significantly greater than the amount of capital committed to the transaction. For example, by entering into repurchase agreements with advance rates, or haircut levels (a haircut is the percentage discount that a repo lender applies to the market value of an asset serving as collateral for a repo borrowing, for the purpose of determining whether such reverse repo borrowing is adequately collateralized), of 3%, we could theoretically leverage capital allocated to Agency RMBS by a debt-to-equity ratio of as much as 33 to 1. There is no specific limit on the amount of leverage that we may use. Leverage can enhance our potential returns but can also exacerbate losses. Even if an asset increases in value, if the asset fails to earn a return that equals or exceeds our cost of borrowing, the leverage will diminish our returns.
Leverage also increases the risk of our being forced to precipitously liquidate our assets. See below—"Our lenders and derivative counterparties may require us to post additional collateral, which may force us to liquidate assets, and if we fail to post sufficient collateral our debts may be accelerated and/or our derivative contracts terminated on unfavorable terms."
Our lenders and derivative counterparties may require us to post additional collateral, which may force us to liquidate assets, and if we fail to post sufficient collateral our debts may be accelerated and/or our derivative contracts terminated on unfavorable terms.
Our repurchase agreements and our derivative contracts allow, to varying degrees, our lenders and derivative counterparties (including clearinghouses) to determine an updated market value of our collateral and derivative contracts to reflect current market conditions. If the market value of our collateral or our derivative contracts with a particular lender or derivative counterparty declines in value, we generally will be required by the lender or derivative counterparty to provide additional collateral or repay a portion of the funds advanced on minimal notice, which is known as a margin call. Posting additional collateral will reduce our liquidity and limit our ability to leverage our assets. Additionally, in order to satisfy a margin call, we may be required to liquidate assets at a disadvantageous time, which could cause us to incur further losses and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, and may impair our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders. We receive margin calls from our lenders and derivative counterparties from time to time in the ordinary course of business

similar to other entities in the specialty finance business. In the event we default on our obligation to satisfy these margin calls, our lenders or derivative counterparties can accelerate our indebtedness, terminate our derivative contracts (potentially on unfavorable terms requiring additional payments, including additional fees and costs), increase our borrowing rates, liquidate our collateral and terminate our ability to borrow. In certain cases, a default on one repurchase agreement or derivative contract (whether caused by a failure to satisfy margin calls or another event of default) can trigger "cross defaults" on other such agreements. A significant increase in margin calls could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders, and could increase our risk of insolvency.
To the extent we might be compelled to liquidate qualifying real estate assets to repay debts, our compliance with the REIT provisions regarding our assets and our sources of income could be negatively affected, which could jeopardize our qualification as a REIT. Losing our REIT qualification would cause us to be subject to U.S. federal income tax (and any applicable state and local taxes) on all of our income and decrease profitability and cash available to pay dividends to our shareholders.
Our rights under repurchase agreements are subject to the effects of the bankruptcy laws in the event of the bankruptcy or insolvency of us or our lenders.
In the event of our insolvency or bankruptcy, certain repurchase agreements may qualify for special treatment under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, the effect of which, among other things, would be to allow the lender to avoid the automatic stay provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and to foreclose on and/or liquidate the collateral pledged under such agreements without delay. In the event of the insolvency or bankruptcy of a lender during the term of a repurchase agreement, the lender may be permitted, under applicable insolvency laws, to repudiate the contract, and our claim against the lender for damages may be treated simply as an unsecured creditor. In addition, if the lender is a broker or dealer subject to the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, or an insured depository institution subject to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, our ability to exercise our rights to recover our securities under a repurchase agreement or to be compensated for any damages resulting from the lenders' insolvency may be further limited by those statutes. These claims would be subject to significant delay and costs to us and, if and when received, may be substantially less than the damages we actually incur.
Hedging against interest rate changes and other risks may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
Subject to maintaining our qualification as a REIT and exclusion from registration under the Investment Company Act, we may pursue various hedging strategies to seek to reduce our exposure to adverse changes in interest rates and, to a lesser extent, credit risk. Our hedging activity is expected to vary in scope based on the level and volatility of interest rates, the types of liabilities and assets held and other changing market conditions. Hedging may fail to protect or could adversely affect us because, among other things:
interest rate hedging can be expensive, particularly during periods of rising and volatile interest rates;
available interest rate hedges may not correspond directly with the interest rate risk for which protection is sought;
the duration of the hedge may not match the duration of the related assets or liabilities being hedged;
most hedges are structured as over-the-counter contracts with private counterparties, raising the possibility that the hedging counterparty may default on their obligations;
to the extent that the creditworthiness of a hedging counterparty deteriorates, it may be difficult or impossible to terminate or assign any hedging transactions with such counterparty to another counterparty;
to the extent hedging transactions do not satisfy certain provisions of the Code and are not made through a TRS, the amount of income that a REIT may earn from hedging transactions to offset interest rate losses is limited by U.S. federal tax provisions governing REITs;
the value of derivatives used for hedging may be adjusted from time to time in accordance with accounting rules to reflect changes in fair value. Downward adjustments, or "mark-to-market losses," would reduce our earnings and our shareholders' equity;
we may fail to correctly assess the degree of correlation between the performance of the instruments used in the hedging strategy and the performance of the assets in the portfolio being hedged;
our Manager may fail to recalculate, re-adjust, and execute hedges in an efficient and timely manner; and
the hedging transactions may actually result in poorer overall performance for us than if we had not engaged in the hedging transactions.

Although we do not intend to operate our non-Agency RMBS investment strategy on a credit-hedged basis in general, we may from time to time opportunistically enter into short positions using credit default swaps to protect against adverse credit events with respect to our non-Agency RMBS, provided that our ability to do so may be limited in order to maintain our qualification as a REIT and maintain our exclusion from registration as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.
Our hedging transactions, which would be intended to limit losses, may actually adversely affect our earnings, which could reduce our cash available for distribution to our shareholders.
Hedging instruments and other derivatives, including some credit default swaps, may not, in many cases, be traded on exchanges, or may not be guaranteed or regulated by any U.S. or foreign governmental authority and involve risks and costs that could result in material losses.
Hedging instruments and other derivatives, including certain types of credit default swaps, involve risk because they may not, in many cases, be traded on exchanges and may not be guaranteed or regulated by any U.S. or foreign governmental authorities. Consequently, for these instruments there may be less stringent requirements with respect to record keeping and compliance with applicable statutory and commodity and other regulatory requirements and, depending on the identity of the counterparty, applicable international requirements. Our Manager is not restricted from dealing with any particular counterparty or from concentrating any or all of its transactions with one counterparty. Furthermore, our Manager has only a limited internal credit function to evaluate the creditworthiness of its counterparties, mainly relying on its experience with such counterparties and their general reputation as participants in these markets. The business failure of a hedging counterparty with whom we enter into a hedging transaction will most likely result in a default under the agreement governing the hedging arrangement. Default by a party with whom we enter into a hedging transaction may result in losses and may force us to re-initiate similar hedges with other counterparties at the then-prevailing market levels. Generally, we will seek to reserve the right to terminate our hedging transactions upon a counterparty's insolvency, but absent an actual insolvency, we may not be able to terminate a hedging transaction without the consent of the hedging counterparty, and we may not be able to assign or otherwise dispose of a hedging transaction to another counterparty without the consent of both the original hedging counterparty and the potential assignee. If we terminate a hedging transaction, we may not be able to enter into a replacement contract in order to cover our risk. There can be no assurance that a liquid secondary market will exist for hedging instruments purchased or sold, and therefore we may be required to maintain any hedging position until exercise or expiration, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or "CFTC," and certain commodity exchanges have established limits referred to as speculative position limits or position limits on the maximum net long or net short position which any person or group of persons may hold or control in particular futures and options. Limits on trading in options contracts also have been established by the various options exchanges. It is possible that trading decisions may have to be modified and that positions held may have to be liquidated in order to avoid exceeding such limits. Such modification or liquidation, if required, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
Certain of our hedging instruments are regulated by the CFTC and such regulations may adversely impact our ability to enter into such hedging instruments and cause us to incur increased costs.
We enter into interest rate swaps to hedge risks associated with our portfolio. Entities entering into such swaps are exposed to credit losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties to these transactions. Effective October 12, 2012, the CFTC issued new rules regarding such swaps under the authority granted to it pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or the "Dodd-Frank Act."
The new rules primarily impacted our trading of these instruments in two ways. First, beginning on June 10, 2013, certain newly executed swaps, including many interest rate swaps, became subject to mandatory clearing through a central counterparty clearinghouse, or "CCP." It is the intent of the Dodd-Frank Act that, by mandating the clearing of swaps in this manner, swap counterparty risk would not become overly concentrated in any single entity, but rather would be spread and centralized among the CCP and its members. We are not a direct member of any CCP, so we must access the CCPs through a futures commission merchant, or "FCM," which acts as intermediary between us and the CCP with respect to all facets of the transaction, including the posting and receipt of required collateral. If we lost access to our FCMs or CCPs, we could potentially be unable to use interest rate swaps and credit default swaps to hedge our risks.
The second way that the new rules impact our trading of these instruments is the Swap Execution Facility, or "SEF," mandate, which came into effect on October 2, 2013, and requires that we execute most interest rate swaps on an electronic platform, rather than over the phone or in some other manner. If we were to lose access to our selected SEFs or we were otherwise unable to communicate with them, this would prevent us from being able to trade these instruments. If we were

unable to execute our hedging trades in a timely manner, particularly in a volatile market environment, we may not be able to execute our strategies in the most advantageous manner.
In addition to subjecting our swap transactions to greater initial margin requirements and additional transaction fees charged by CCPs, FCMs, and SEFs, our swap transactions are now subjected to greater regulation by both the CFTC and the SEC. These additional fees, costs, margin requirements, documentation, and regulation could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
Additionally, for all interest rate swaps we entered into prior to June 10, 2013, we were not required to clear them through a CCP and as a result these swaps are still subject to the risks of nonperformance by any of the individual counterparties with whom we entered into these transactions described in "—Hedging instruments and other derivatives, including some credit default swaps, may not, in many cases, be traded on regulated exchanges, or may not be guaranteed or regulated by any U.S. or foreign governmental authority and involve risks and costs that could result in material losses" above.
Our use of derivatives may expose us to counterparty risk.
We have entered into interest rate swaps and other derivatives that have not been cleared by a CCP. If a derivative counterparty cannot perform under the terms of the derivative contract, we would not receive payments due under that agreement, we may lose any unrealized gain associated with the derivative, and the hedged liability would cease to be hedged by such instrument. If a derivative counterparty becomes insolvent or files for bankruptcy, we may also be at risk for any collateral we have pledged to such counterparty to secure our obligations under derivative contracts, and we may incur significant costs in attempting to recover such collateral.
We engage in short selling transactions, which may subject us to additional risks.
Many of our hedging transactions, and occasionally our investment transactions, are short sales. Short selling may involve selling securities that are not owned and typically borrowing the same securities for delivery to the purchaser, with an obligation to repurchase the borrowed securities at a later date. Short selling allows the investor to profit from declines in market prices to the extent such declines exceed the transaction costs and the costs of borrowing the securities. A short sale may create the risk of an unlimited loss, in that the price of the underlying security might theoretically increase without limit, thus increasing the cost of repurchasing the securities. There can be no assurance that securities sold short will be available for repurchase or borrowing. Repurchasing securities to close out a short position can itself cause the price of the securities to rise further, thereby exacerbating the loss.
We, Ellington, or its affiliates may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory changes.
At any time, laws or regulations that impact our business, or the administrative interpretations of those laws or regulations, may be enacted or amended. For example, on July 21, 2010 the Dodd-Frank Act was enacted, which significantly revised many financial regulations. Certain portions of the Dodd-Frank Act were effective immediately, while other portions have become or will become effective following rulemaking and transition periods, but many of these changes could materially impact the profitability of our business or the business of our Manager or Ellington, our access to financing or capital, the value of the assets that we hold, expose us to additional costs, require changes to business practices, or adversely affect our ability to pay dividends. For example, the Dodd-Frank Act alters the regulation of commodity interests, imposes new regulation on the over-the-counter derivatives market, places restrictions on residential mortgage loan originations, and reforms the asset-backed securitization markets most notably by imposing credit requirements. While there continues to be uncertainty about the exact impact of all of these changes, we do know that we and our Manager are subject to a more complex regulatory framework, and are incurring and will in the future incur costs to comply with new requirements as well as to monitor compliance in the future.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, President Donald Trump has expressed support for reducing regulations governing the financial services industry, including the rules and regulations promulgated under the Dodd-Frank Act.
We cannot predict when or if any new law, regulation, or administrative interpretation, including those related to the Dodd-Frank Act, or any amendment to or repeal of any existing law, regulation, or administrative interpretation, will be adopted or promulgated or will become effective. Additionally, the adoption or implementation of any new law, regulation, or administrative interpretation, or any revisions in or repeals of these laws, regulations, or administrative interpretations, including those related to the Dodd-Frank Act, could cause us to change our portfolio, could constrain our strategy, or increase our costs. We could be adversely affected by any change in or any promulgation of new law, regulation, or administrative interpretation.

We may change our investment strategy, investment guidelines, hedging strategy, and asset allocation, operational, and management policies without notice or shareholder consent, which may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders. In addition, our declaration of trust provides that our Board of Trustees may authorize us to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our shareholders.
We may change our investment strategy, investment guidelines, hedging strategy, and asset allocation, operational, and management policies at any time without notice to or consent from our shareholders. As a result, the types or mix of assets, liabilities, or hedging transactions in our portfolio may be different from, and possibly riskier than, the types or mix of assets, liabilities, and hedging transactions that we have historically held, or that are otherwise described in this report. A change in our strategy may increase our exposure to real estate values, interest rates, and other factors. Our Board of Trustees determines our investment guidelines and our operational policies, and may amend or revise our policies, including those with respect to our acquisitions, growth, operations, indebtedness, capitalization, and dividends or approve transactions that deviate from these policies without a vote of, or notice to, our shareholders.
In addition, our declaration of trust provides that our Board of Trustees may authorize us to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our shareholders, if it determines that it is no longer in our best interests to qualify as a REIT. These changes could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
We operate in a highly competitive market.
Our profitability depends, in large part, on our ability to acquire targeted assets at favorable prices. We compete with a number of entities when acquiring our targeted assets, including other mortgage REITs, financial companies, public and private funds, commercial and investment banks and residential and commercial finance companies. We may also compete with (i) the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury to the extent they purchase assets in our targeted asset classes and (ii) companies that partner with and/or receive financing from the U.S. Government. Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably more favorable access to capital and other resources than we do. Furthermore, new companies with significant amounts of capital have been formed or have raised additional capital, and may continue to be formed and raise additional capital in the future, and these companies may have objectives that overlap with ours, which may create competition for assets we wish to acquire. Some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us, such as funding from the U.S. Government. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of assets to acquire or pay higher prices than we can. We also may have different operating constraints from those of our competitors including, among others, (i) tax-driven constraints such as those arising from our qualification as a REIT, (ii) restraints imposed on us by our attempt to comply with certain exclusions from the definition of an "investment company" or other exemptions under the Investment Company Act and (iii) restraints and additional costs arising from our status as a public company. Furthermore, competition for assets in our targeted asset classes may lead to the price of such assets increasing, which may further limit our ability to generate desired returns. We cannot assure you that the competitive pressures we face will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
An increase in interest rates may cause a decrease in the issuance volumes of certain of our targeted assets, which could adversely affect our ability to acquire targeted assets that satisfy our investment objectives and to generate income and pay dividends.
Rising interest rates generally reduce the demand for mortgage loans due to the higher cost of borrowing. A reduction in the volume of mortgage loans originated may affect the volume of targeted assets available to us, which could adversely affect our ability to acquire assets that satisfy our investment objectives. If rising interest rates cause us to be unable to acquire a sufficient volume of our targeted assets with a yield that is above our borrowing cost, our ability to satisfy our investment objectives and to generate income and pay dividends to our shareholders may be materially and adversely affected.
Lack of diversification in the number of assets we acquire would increase our dependence on relatively few individual assets.
Our management objectives and policies do not place a limit on the amount of capital used to support, or the exposure to (by any other measure), any individual asset or any group of assets with similar characteristics or risks. As a result, our portfolio may be concentrated in a small number of assets or may be otherwise undiversified, increasing the risk of loss and the magnitude of potential losses to us and our shareholders if one or more of these assets perform poorly.
For example, our portfolio of mortgage-related assets may at times be concentrated in certain property types that are subject to higher risk of foreclosure, or secured by properties concentrated in a limited number of geographic locations. To the

extent that our portfolio is concentrated in any one region or type of security, downturns relating generally to such region or type of security may result in defaults on a number of our assets within a short time period, which may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
Our ability to pay dividends will depend on our operating results, our financial condition and other factors, and we may not be able to pay dividends at a fixed rate or at all under certain circumstances.
We intend to pay dividends to our shareholders in amounts such that we distribute all or substantially all of each year's taxable income (subject to certain adjustments). This distribution policy will enable us to avoid being subject to U.S. federal income tax on our REIT taxable income that we distribute to our shareholders. However, our ability to pay dividends will depend on our earnings, our financial condition and such other factors as our Board of Trustees may deem relevant from time to time. We will declare and pay dividends only to the extent approved by our Board of Trustees.
Failure to procure adequate funding and capital would adversely affect our results and may, in turn, negatively affect the value of our common shares and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
We depend upon the availability of adequate funding and capital for our operations. To maintain our status as a REIT, we are required to distribute to our shareholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income annually, determined excluding any net capital gains and without regard to the deduction for dividends paid. As a result, we are not able to retain much or any of our earnings for new investments. We cannot assure you that any, or sufficient, funding or capital will be available to us in the future on terms that are acceptable to us. In the event that we cannot obtain sufficient funding and capital on acceptable terms, there may be a negative impact on the value of our common shares and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders, and you may lose part or all of your investment.
Risks Related to our Relationship with our Manager and Ellington
We cannot assure you that our Manager's past experience will be sufficient to successfully manage our business as a REIT.
Our Manager has operated us as a REIT since 2013. The REIT provisions of the Code are complex, and any failure to comply with those provisions in a timely manner could prevent us from maintaining our qualification as a REIT or force us to pay unexpected taxes and penalties. In such event, our net income would be reduced and we could incur a loss.
We are dependent on our Manager and certain key personnel of Ellington that are provided to us through our Manager and may not find a suitable replacement if our Manager terminates the management agreement or such key personnel are no longer available to us.
We do not have any employees of our own. Our officers are employees of Ellington or one or more of its affiliates. We have no separate facilities and are completely reliant on our Manager, which has significant discretion as to the implementation of our operating policies and execution of our business strategies and risk management practices. We also depend on our Manager's access to the professionals and principals of Ellington as well as information and deal flow generated by Ellington. The employees of Ellington identify, evaluate, negotiate, structure, close, and monitor our portfolio. The departure of any of the senior officers of our Manager, or of a significant number of investment professionals or principals of Ellington, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our objectives. We can offer no assurance that our Manager will remain our manager or that we will continue to have access to our Manager's senior management. We are subject to the risk that our Manager will terminate the management agreement or that we may deem it necessary to terminate the management agreement or prevent certain individuals from performing services for us and that no suitable replacement will be found to manage us.
The management fees payable to our Manager are payable regardless of the performance of our portfolio, which may reduce our Manager's incentive to devote the time and effort to seeking profitable opportunities for our portfolio.
We pay our Manager management fees, which may be substantial, based on our shareholders' equity (as defined in the management agreement) regardless of the performance of our portfolio. The management fee takes into account the net issuance proceeds of both common and preferred share offerings. Our Manager's entitlement to non-performance-based compensation might reduce its incentive to devote the time and effort of its professionals to seeking profitable opportunities for our portfolio, which could result in a lower performance of our portfolio and materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
Our Board of Trustees has approved very broad investment guidelines for our Manager and will not approve each decision made by our Manager to acquire, dispose of, or otherwise manage an asset.
Our Manager is authorized to follow very broad guidelines in pursuing our strategy. While our Board of Trustees periodically reviews our guidelines and our portfolio and asset-management decisions, it generally does not review all of our

proposed acquisitions, dispositions, and other management decisions. In addition, in conducting periodic reviews, our Board of Trustees relies primarily on information provided to them by our Manager. Furthermore, our Manager may arrange for us to use complex strategies or to enter into complex transactions that may be difficult or impossible to unwind by the time they are reviewed by our Board of Trustees. Our Manager has great latitude within the broad guidelines in determining the types of assets it may decide are proper for us to acquire and other decisions with respect to the management of those assets subject to our maintaining our qualification as a REIT. Poor decisions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
We compete with Ellington's other accounts for access to Ellington.
Ellington has sponsored and/or currently manages accounts with a focus that overlaps with our investment focus, and expects to continue to do so in the future. Ellington is not restricted in any way from sponsoring or accepting capital from new accounts, even for investing in asset classes or strategies that are similar to, or overlapping with, our asset classes or strategies. Therefore, we compete for access to the benefits that our relationship with our Manager and Ellington provides us. For the same reasons, the personnel of Ellington and our Manager may be unable to dedicate a substantial portion of their time managing our assets.
We compete with other Ellington accounts for opportunities to acquire assets, which are allocated in accordance with Ellington's investment allocation policies.
Many, if not most, of our targeted assets are also targeted assets of other Ellington accounts and Ellington has no duty to allocate such opportunities in a manner that preferentially favors us. Ellington makes available to us all opportunities to acquire assets that it determines, in its reasonable and good faith judgment, based on our objectives, policies and strategies, and other relevant factors, are appropriate for us in accordance with Ellington's written investment allocation policy, it being understood that we might not participate in each such opportunity, but will on an overall basis equitably participate with Ellington's other accounts in all such opportunities.
Since many of our targeted assets are typically available only in specified quantities, Ellington often is not able to buy as much of any asset or group of assets as would be required to satisfy the needs of all of Ellington's accounts. In these cases, Ellington's investment allocation procedures and policies typically allocate such assets to multiple accounts in proportion to their needs and available capital. As part of these policies, accounts that are in a "start-up" or "ramp-up" phase may get allocations above their proportion of available capital, which could work to our disadvantage, particularly because there are no limitations surrounding Ellington's ability to create new accounts. In addition, the policies permit departure from proportional allocations under certain circumstances, for example when such allocation would result in an inefficiently small amount of the security being purchased for an account, which may also result in our not participating in certain allocations.
The Blackstone Funds have significant influence over us and may have conflicts of interest with us or you now or in the future.
The Blackstone Funds own a significant portion of our common shares, and one of our trustees is also an affiliate of Blackstone, while another of our trustees serves as a Senior Advisor to Blackstone and serves on other boards of companies that are affiliates of Blackstone. As a result, Blackstone may have influence over our ability to enter into any corporate transaction that requires the approval of shareholders regardless of whether shareholders believe that any such transactions are in their best interests. Similarly, Blackstone may have influence over transactions that we engage in including transactions which require the approval of our trustees. Such items may include decisions related to future capital raises, investment strategy, dividend declarations, financing decisions and decisions regarding our Manager. Blackstone is also in the business of making investments in companies and may from time to time acquire and hold interests in businesses that compete directly or indirectly with us. Blackstone may also pursue acquisition opportunities that are complementary to our business, and, as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us. As long as funds controlled by or associated with Blackstone continue to own a significant amount of our outstanding common shares, or Blackstone affiliates continue to serve as our trustees, Blackstone may continue to be able to influence our decisions.
There are conflicts of interest in our relationships with our Manager and Ellington, which could result in decisions that are not in the best interests of our shareholders.
We are subject to conflicts of interest arising out of our relationship with Ellington and our Manager. Currently, all of our executive officers, and two of our trustees, are employees of Ellington or one or more of its affiliates. As a result, our Manager and our officers may have conflicts between their duties to us and their duties to, and interests in, Ellington or our Manager. For example, Mr. Penn, our President and Chief Executive Officer and one of our trustees, also serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer of, and as a Member of the Board of Directors of, Ellington Financial LLC, and Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer of Ellington, Ms. Mumford, our Chief Financial Officer, also serves as the Chief Financial Officer of

Ellington Financial LLC, Mr. Tecotzky, our Co-Chief Investment Officer, also serves as the Co-Chief Investment Officer of Ellington Financial LLC, and a Managing Director of Ellington, and Mr. Vranos, our Co-Chief Investment Officer and one of our trustees, also serves as the Co-Chief Investment Officer of, and as a Member of the Board of Directors of, Ellington Financial LLC, and Chairman of Ellington.
We may acquire or sell assets in which Ellington or its affiliates have or may have an interest. Similarly, Ellington or its affiliates may acquire or sell assets in which we have or may have an interest. Although such acquisitions or dispositions may present conflicts of interest, we nonetheless may pursue and consummate such transactions. Additionally, we may engage in transactions directly with Ellington or its affiliates, including the purchase and sale of all or a portion of a portfolio asset.
Acquisitions made for entities with similar objectives may be different from those made on our behalf. Ellington may have economic interests in, or other relationships with, others in whose obligations or securities we may acquire. In particular, such persons may make and/or hold an investment in securities that we acquire that may be pari passu, senior, or junior in ranking to our interest in the securities or in which partners, security holders, officers, directors, agents, or employees of such persons serve on boards of directors or otherwise have ongoing relationships. Each of such ownership and other relationships may result in securities laws restrictions on transactions in such securities and otherwise create conflicts of interest. In such instances, Ellington may, in its sole discretion, make recommendations and decisions regarding such securities for other entities that may be the same as or different from those made with respect to such securities and may take actions (or omit to take actions) in the context of these other economic interests or relationships the consequences of which may be adverse to our interests.
In deciding whether to issue additional debt or equity securities, we will rely in part on recommendations made by our Manager. While such decisions are subject to the approval of our Board of Trustees, two of our trustees are also Ellington employees. Because our Manager earns management fees that are based on the total amount of our equity capital, our Manager may have an incentive to recommend that we issue additional equity securities. In addition, through its non-voting special membership interests in an affiliate of Ellington, the Blackstone Funds are entitled to receive distributions from such affiliate equal to a portion of the management fees that are paid to our Manager, and therefore our trustee affiliated with Blackstone may have a similar incentive for us to issue additional equity securities. See below for further discussion of the adverse impact future debt or equity offerings could have on our common shares. Future offerings of debt securities, which would rank senior to our common shares upon liquidation, and future offerings of equity securities which would dilute the common shares holdings of our existing shareholders and may be senior to our common shares for the purposes of dividend and liquidating distributions, may adversely affect the market price of our common shares.
The officers of our Manager and its affiliates devote as much time to us as our Manager deems appropriate; however, these officers may have conflicts in allocating their time and services among us and Ellington and its affiliates' accounts. During turbulent conditions in the mortgage industry, distress in the credit markets or other times when we will need focused support and assistance from our Manager and Ellington employees, other entities that Ellington advises or manages will likewise require greater focus and attention, placing our Manager and Ellington's resources in high demand. In such situations, we may not receive the necessary support and assistance we require or would otherwise receive if we were internally managed or if Ellington or its affiliates did not act as a manager for other entities.
We, directly or through Ellington, may obtain confidential information about the companies or securities in which we have invested or may invest. If we do possess confidential information about such companies or securities, there may be restrictions on our ability to dispose of, increase the amount of, or otherwise take action with respect to the securities of such companies. Our Manager's and Ellington's management of other accounts could create a conflict of interest to the extent our Manager or Ellington is aware of material non-public information concerning potential investment decisions. We have implemented compliance procedures and practices designed to ensure that investment decisions are not made while in possession of material non-public information. We cannot assure you, however, that these procedures and practices will be effective. In addition, this conflict and these procedures and practices may limit the freedom of our Manager to make potentially profitable investments, which could have an adverse effect on our operations. These limitations imposed by access to confidential information could therefore materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
The management agreement with our Manager was not negotiated on an arm's-length basis and may not be as favorable to us as if it had been negotiated with an unaffiliated third party and may be costly and difficult to terminate.
Our management agreement with our Manager was negotiated between related parties, and its terms, including fees payable, may not be as favorable to us as if it had been negotiated with an unaffiliated third party. Various potential and actual conflicts of interest may arise from the activities of Ellington and its affiliates by virtue of the fact that our Manager is controlled by Ellington.

Termination of our management agreement without cause, including termination for poor performance or non-renewal, is subject to several conditions which may make such a termination difficult and costly. The management agreement has a current term that expires on September 24, 2017, and will be automatically renewed for successive one-year terms thereafter unless notice of non-renewal is delivered by either party to the other party at least 180 days prior to the expiration of the then current term. The management agreement provides that it may be terminated by us based on performance upon the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of our independent trustees, or by a vote of the holders of at least a majority of our outstanding common shares, based either upon unsatisfactory performance by our Manager that is materially detrimental to us or upon a determination by the Board of Trustees that the management fee payable to our Manager is not fair, subject to our Manager's right to prevent such a termination by accepting a mutually acceptable reduction of management fees. In the event we terminate the management agreement as discussed above or elect not to renew the management agreement, we will be required to pay our Manager a termination fee equal to 5% of our shareholders' equity as of the month-end preceding the date of the notice of termination or non-renewal. These provisions will increase the effective cost to us of terminating the management agreement, thereby adversely affecting our ability to terminate our Manager without cause.
Pursuant to the management agreement, our Manager will not assume any responsibility other than to render the services called for thereunder and will not be responsible for any action of our Board of Trustees in following or declining to follow its advice or recommendations. Under the terms of the management agreement, our Manager, Ellington, and their affiliates and each of their officers, directors, trustees, members, shareholders, partners, managers, investment and risk management committee members, employees, agents, successors and assigns, will not be liable to us for acts or omissions performed in accordance with and pursuant to the management agreement, except because of acts constituting bad faith, willful misconduct, gross negligence, fraud or reckless disregard of their duties under the management agreement. In addition, we will indemnify our Manager, Ellington, and their affiliates and each of their officers, directors, trustees, members, shareholders, partners, managers, investment and risk management committee members, employees, agents, successors and assigns, with respect to all expenses, losses, damages, liabilities, demands, charges and claims arising from acts of our Manager not constituting bad faith, willful misconduct, gross negligence, fraud or material breach or reckless disregard of duties, performed in good faith in accordance with and pursuant to the management agreement.
Our Manager's failure to identify and acquire assets that meet our asset criteria or perform its responsibilities under the management agreement could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, our ability to maintain our qualification as a REIT and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
Our ability to achieve our objectives depends on our Manager's ability to identify and acquire assets that meet our asset criteria. Accomplishing our objectives is largely a function of our Manager's structuring of our investment process, our access to financing on acceptable terms, and general market conditions. Our shareholders do not have input into our investment decisions. All of these factors increase the uncertainty, and thus the risk, of investing in our common shares. The senior management team of our Manager has substantial responsibilities under the management agreement. In order to implement certain strategies, our Manager may need to hire, train, supervise, and manage new employees successfully. Any failure to manage our future growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, our ability to maintain our qualification as a REIT and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
If our Manager ceases to be our Manager pursuant to the management agreement or one or more of our Manager's key personnel ceases to provide services to us, our lenders and our derivative counterparties may cease doing business with us.
If our Manager ceases to be our Manager, or if one or more of our Manager's key personnel cease to provide services for us, it could constitute an event of default or early termination event under many of our repo financing and derivative hedging agreements, upon which our counterparties would have the right to terminate their agreements with us. If our Manager ceases to be our Manager for any reason, including upon the non-renewal of our management agreement and we are unable to obtain or renew financing or enter into or maintain derivative transactions, our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders may be materially adversely affected.
We do not own the Ellington brand or trademark, but may use the brand and trademark as well as our logo pursuant to the terms of a license granted by Ellington.
Ellington has licensed the "Ellington" brand, trademark, and logo to us for so long as our Manager or another affiliate of Ellington continues to act as our Manager. We do not own the brand, trademark, or logo that we will use in our business and may be unable to protect this intellectual property against infringement from third parties. Ellington retains the right to continue using the "Ellington" brand and trademark. We will further be unable to preclude Ellington from licensing or transferring the ownership of the "Ellington" brand and trademark to third parties, some of whom may compete against us. Consequently, we will be unable to prevent any damage to goodwill that may occur as a result of the activities of Ellington or others. Furthermore, in the event our Manager or another affiliate of Ellington ceases to act as our Manager, or in the event Ellington terminates the

license, we will be required to change our name and trademark. Any of these events could disrupt our recognition in the marketplace, damage any goodwill we may have generated, and otherwise harm our business. Finally, the license is a domestic license in the United States only and does not give us any right to use the "Ellington" brand, trademark, and logo overseas even though we expect to use the brand, trademark, and logo overseas. Our use of the "Ellington" brand, trademark and logo overseas will therefore be unlicensed and could expose us to a claim of infringement.
We or Ellington or its affiliates may be subject to regulatory inquiries or proceedings.
At any time, industry-wide or company-specific regulatory inquiries or proceedings can be initiated and we cannot predict when or if any such regulatory inquiries or proceedings will be initiated that involve us or Ellington or its affiliates, including our Manager. For example, over the years, Ellington and its affiliates have received, and we expect in the future that we and they may receive, inquiries and requests for documents and information from various federal, state, and foreign regulators, including those identified under the caption Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
We can give no assurances that regulatory inquiries will not result in investigations of us or Ellington or its affiliates, or in enforcement actions, fines or penalties, or the assertion of private litigation claims against us or, Ellington or its affiliates. We believe that the heightened scrutiny of the financial services industry increases the risk of additional inquiries and requests from regulatory or enforcement agencies. In the event regulatory inquiries were to result in investigations, enforcement actions, fines, penalties, or the assertion of private litigation claims against us or Ellington or its affiliates, we, or our Manager's ability to perform its obligations to us under the management agreement between us and our Manager, or Ellington's ability to perform its obligations to our Manager under the services agreement between Ellington and our Manager, could be adversely impacted, which could in turn have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
Risks Related to Our Common Shares
The market for our common shares may be limited, which may adversely affect the price at which our common shares trade and make it difficult to sell our common shares.
While our common shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, such listing does not provide any assurance as to:
whether the market price of our shares will reflect our actual financial performance;
the liquidity of our common shares;
the ability of any holder to sell common shares; or
the prices that may be obtained for our common shares.
The market price and trading volume of our common shares may be volatile.
The market price of our common shares may be highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations. In addition, the trading volume in our common shares may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to occur. We cannot assure you that the market price of our common shares will not fluctuate or decline significantly in the future. Some of the factors that could negatively affect our share price or result in fluctuations in the price or trading volume of our common shares include:
actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating results or dividends;
changes in our earnings estimates, failure to meet earnings or operating results expectations of public market analysts and investors, or publication of research reports about us or the real estate specialty finance industry;
increases in market interest rates that lead purchasers of our common shares to demand a higher yield;
passage of legislation, changes in applicable law, court rulings, enforcement actions or other regulatory developments that adversely affect us or our industry;
changes in government policies or changes in timing of implementation of government policies, including with respect to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae;
changes in market valuations of similar companies;
adverse market reaction to any increased indebtedness we incur in the future;
additions or departures of key management personnel;
actions by shareholders;
speculation in the press or investment community;
general market and economic conditions;

our operating performance and the performance of other similar companies;
changes in accounting principles; and
the disposition by the Blackstone Funds of all or any portion of our common shares held by them in accordance with and subject to applicable securities laws.
For as long as we are an emerging growth company, we will not be required to comply with certain reporting requirements, including those relating to accounting standards and disclosure about our executive compensation, that apply to other public companies.
We are an "emerging growth company," as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act, as modified by the Jumpstart our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the "JOBS Act." As such, we are eligible to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not "emerging growth companies," including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and of shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. Since we take advantage of these exemptions, some investors may find our common shares less attractive as a result. The result may be a less active trading market for our common shares and our share price may be more volatile.
We could remain an emerging growth company through December 31, 2018 or until the earliest of (a) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our annual gross revenues exceed $1 billion, (b) the date that we become a "large accelerated filer" as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, which would occur if the market value of our common shares that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, or (c) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt securities during the preceding three-year period.
Wequalify as an "emerging growth company" and are taking advantage of an extended transition period to comply with new or revised accounting standards applicable to public companies.
We qualify as an emerging growth company as defined in the JOBS Act. Pursuant to Section 107 of the JOBS Act, as an "emerging growth company," we are permitted to take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards, which allows us to delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period. As a result of our election to utilize the extended transition period, our financial statements may not be comparable to those of other public companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards. Please refer to "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies" for further discussion of our election to utilize the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards.
Futureofferings of debt securities, which would rank senior to our common shares upon our bankruptcy liquidation, and future offerings of equity securities which would dilute the common share holdings of our existing shareholders and may be senior to our common shares for the purposes of dividend and liquidating distributions, may adversely affect the market price of our common shares.
In the future, we may attempt to increase our capital resources by making offerings of debt securities or additional offerings of equity securities. Upon bankruptcy or liquidation, holders of our debt securities and preferred shares, if any, and lenders with respect to other borrowings will receive a distribution of our available assets prior to the holders of our common shares. Our preferred shares, if issued, could have a preference on liquidating distributions or a preference on dividend payments or both that could limit our ability to pay a dividend or other distribution to the holders of our common shares. Because our decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings. Thus, holders of our common shares bear the risk of our future offerings reducing the market price of our common shares and diluting their share holdings in our company.
Future sales of our common shares or other securities convertible into our common shares could cause the market value of our common shares to decline and could result in dilution of your shares.
Sales of substantial amounts of our common shares or other securities convertible into our common shares could cause the market price of our common shares to decrease significantly. We cannot predict the effect, if any, of future sales of our common shares or other securities convertible into our common shares, or the availability of such securities for future sales, on the value

of our common shares. Sales of substantial amounts of our common shares or other securities convertible into our common shares, or the perception that such sales could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market values for our common shares.
Our shareholders may not receive dividends or dividends may not grow over time.
We have not established a minimum dividend payment level and our ability to pay dividends may be adversely affected by a number of factors, including the risk factors described herein. All dividends will be declared at the discretion of our Board of Trustees and will depend on our earnings, our financial condition, and other factors as our Board of Trustees may deem relevant from time to time. Our Board of Trustees is under no obligation or requirement to declare a dividend. We cannot assure you that we will achieve results that will allow us to pay a specified level of dividends or to increase dividends from one year to the next. Among the factors that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders are:
our inability to realize positive or attractive returns on our portfolio, whether because of defaults in our portfolio, decreases in the value of our portfolio, or otherwise;
margin calls or other expenditures that reduce our cash flow and impact our liquidity; and
increases in actual or estimated operating expenses.
An increase in interest rates may have an adverse effect on the market price of our common shares and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
One of the factors that investors may consider in deciding whether to buy or sell our common shares is our dividend rate (or expected future dividend rate) as a percentage of our common share price, relative to market interest rates. If market interest rates increase, prospective investors may demand a higher dividend rate on our common shares or seek alternative investments paying higher dividends or interest. As a result, interest rate fluctuations and capital market conditions can affect the market price of our common shares independent of the effects such conditions may have on our portfolio. For instance, if interest rates rise without an increase in our dividend rate, the market price of our common shares could decrease because potential investors may require a higher dividend yield on our common shares as market rates on interest-bearing instruments such as bonds rise. In addition, to the extent we have variable rate debt, such as our repurchase agreement financing, rising interest rates would result in increased interest expense on this variable rate debt, thereby adversely affecting our cash flow and our ability to service our indebtedness and pay dividends to our shareholders.
Investing in our common shares involves a high degree of risk.
The assets we purchase in accordance with our objectives may result in a higher amount of risk than other alternative asset acquisition options. The assets we acquire may be highly speculative and aggressive and may be subject to a variety of risks, including credit risk, prepayment risk, interest rate risk, and market risk. As a result, an investment in our common shares may not be suitable for investors with lower risk tolerance.
Risks Related to Our Organization and Structure
Maintenance of our exclusion from registration as an investment company under the Investment Company Act imposes significant limitations on our operations.
We have conducted and intend to continue to conduct our operations so that neither we nor any of our subsidiaries are required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. Both we and our Operating Partnership are organized as holding companies and conduct our business primarily through wholly-owned subsidiaries of our Operating Partnership. Investments in subsidiaries that rely on the exclusions from the definition of investment company under 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act are considered investment securities for the purposes of the 40% Test. Therefore, our Operating Partnership's investments in its 3(c)(7) subsidiaries and its other investment securities cannot exceed 40% of the value of our Operating Partnership's total assets (excluding U.S. government securities and cash) on an unconsolidated basis. This requirement limits the types of businesses in which we may engage and the assets we may hold. Certain of our Operating Partnership's subsidiaries rely on the exclusion provided by Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act. Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act is designed for entities "primarily engaged in the business of purchasing or otherwise acquiring mortgages and other liens on and interests in real estate." This exclusion generally requires that at least 55% of the entity's assets on an unconsolidated basis consist of qualifying real estate assets and at least 80% of the entity's assets on an unconsolidated basis consist of qualifying real estate assets or real estate-related assets. These requirements limit the assets those subsidiaries can own and the timing of sales and purchases of those assets.
To classify the assets held by our subsidiaries as qualifying real estate assets or real estate-related assets, we rely on no-action letters and other guidance published by the SEC staff regarding those kinds of assets, as well as upon our analyses (in

consultation with outside counsel) of guidance published with respect to other types of assets. There can be no assurance that the laws and regulations governing the Investment Company Act status of companies similar to ours, or the guidance from the SEC staff regarding the treatment of assets as qualifying real estate assets or real estate-related assets, will not change in a manner that adversely affects our operations. In fact, in August 2011, the SEC published a concept release in which it asked for comments on this exclusion from registration. To the extent that the SEC staff provides more specific guidance regarding any of the matters bearing upon our exclusion from the definition of an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we may be required to adjust our strategy accordingly. Any additional guidance from the SEC staff could further inhibit our ability to pursue the strategies that we have chosen. Furthermore, although we monitor the assets of our subsidiaries regularly, there can be no assurance that our subsidiaries will be able to maintain their exclusion from registration. Any of the foregoing could require us to adjust our strategy, which could limit our ability to make certain investments or require us to sell assets in a manner, at a price or at a time that we otherwise would not have chosen. This could negatively affect the value of our common shares, the sustainability of our business model, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
The ownership limits in our declaration of trust may discourage a takeover or business combination that may have benefited our shareholders.
To assist us in qualifying as a REIT, among other purposes, our declaration of trust restricts the beneficial or constructive ownership of our shares by any person to no more than 9.8% in value or the number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of any class or series of our shares. This and other restrictions on ownership and transfer of our shares contained in our declaration of trust may discourage a change of control of us and may deter individuals or entities from making tender offers for our common shares on terms that might be financially attractive to you or which may cause a change in our management. In addition to deterring potential transactions that may be favorable to our shareholders, these provisions may also decrease your ability to sell our common shares.
Our shareholders' ability to control our operations is severely limited.
Our Board of Trustees has approval rights with respect to our major strategies, including our strategies regarding investments, financing, growth, debt capitalization, REIT qualification and distributions. Our Board of Trustees may amend or revise these and other strategies without a vote of our shareholders.
Certain provisions of Maryland law could inhibit a change in our control.
Certain provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law, or the MGCL, applicable to a Maryland real estate investment trust may have the effect of inhibiting a third party from making a proposal to acquire us or of impeding a change in our control under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of our common shares with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then prevailing market price of such shares. We are subject to the "business combination" provisions of the MGCL that, subject to limitations, prohibit certain business combinations between us and an "interested shareholder" (defined generally as any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of our then outstanding voting shares or an affiliate or associate of ours who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of our then outstanding voting shares) or an affiliate thereof for five years after the most recent date on which the shareholder becomes an interested shareholder and, thereafter, imposes minimum price or supermajority shareholder voting requirements on these combinations. These provisions of the MGCL do not apply, however, to business combinations that are approved or exempted by the board of trustees of a real estate investment trust prior to the time that the interested shareholder becomes an interested shareholder. Pursuant to the statute, our Board of Trustees has by resolution exempted business combinations between us and any other person, provided that the business combination is first approved by our Board of Trustees, including a majority of our trustees who are not affiliates or associates of such person. This resolution, however, may be altered or repealed in whole or in part at any time. If this resolution is repealed, or our Board of Trustees does not otherwise approve a business combination, this statute may discourage others from trying to acquire control of us and increase the difficulty of consummating any offer.
The "control share" provisions of the MGCL provide that holders of "control shares" of a Maryland real estate investment trust (defined as shares which, when aggregated with all other shares controlled by the shareholder, entitle the shareholder to exercise one of three increasing ranges of voting power in the election of trustees) acquired in a "control share acquisition" (defined as the acquisition of "control shares," subject to certain exceptions) have no voting rights with respect to the control shares except to the extent approved by the Maryland real estate investment trust's shareholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding votes entitled to be cast by the acquirer of control shares, its officers and its trustees who are also employees of the Maryland real estate investment trust. Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the control share acquisition statute any and all acquisitions by any person of our shares. There can be no assurance that this provision will not be amended or eliminated at any time in the future.

The "unsolicited takeover" provisions of the MGCL permit our Board of Trustees, without shareholder approval and regardless of what is currently provided in our declaration of trust or bylaws, to implement certain provisions. These provisions may have the effect of inhibiting a third party from making an acquisition proposal for us or of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in our control under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of our common shares with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then current market price.
Our authorized but unissued common and preferred shares may prevent a change in our control.
Our declaration of trust authorizes us to issue additional authorized but unissued common shares and preferred shares. In addition, our Board of Trustees may, without shareholder approval, approve amendments to our declaration of trust to increase the aggregate number of our authorized shares or the number of shares of any class or series that we have authority to issue and may classify or reclassify any unissued common shares or preferred shares and may set the preferences, rights and other terms of the classified or reclassified shares. As a result, among other things, our Board may establish a class or series of common shares or preferred shares that could delay or prevent a transaction or a change in our control that might involve a premium price for our common shares or otherwise be in the best interests of our shareholders.
Our rights and the rights of our shareholders to take action against our trustees and officers or against our Manager or Ellington are limited, which could limit your recourse in the event actions are taken that are not in your best interests.
Our declaration of trust limits the liability of our present and former trustees and officers to us and our shareholders for money damages to the maximum extent permitted under Maryland law. Under current Maryland law, our present and former trustees and officers will not have any liability to us or our shareholders for money damages other than liability resulting from:
actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services;
or active and deliberate dishonesty by the trustee or officer that was established by a final judgment and is material to the cause of action.
Our declaration of trust authorizes us to indemnify our present and former trustees and officers for actions taken by them in those and other capacities to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law. Our bylaws require us to indemnify each present and former trustee or officer, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, in the defense of any proceeding to which he or she is made, or threatened to be made, a party by reason of his or her service to us as a trustee or officer or in certain other capacities. In addition, we may be obligated to pay or reimburse the expenses incurred by our present and former trustees and officers without requiring a preliminary determination of their ultimate entitlement to indemnification.
As a result, we and our shareholders may have more limited rights against our present and former trustees and officers than might otherwise exist absent the current provisions in our declaration of trust and bylaws or that might exist with other companies, which could limit your recourse in the event of actions not in your best interest.
Our declaration of trust contains provisions that make removal of our trustees difficult, which could make it difficult for our shareholders to effect changes to our management.
Our declaration of trust provides that, subject to the rights of holders of any series of preferred shares, a trustee may be removed only for "cause" (as defined in our declaration of trust), and then only by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast generally in the election of trustees. Vacancies generally may be filled only by a majority of the remaining trustees in office, even if less than a quorum, for the full term of the class of trustees in which the vacancy occurred. These requirements make it more difficult to change our management by removing and replacing trustees and may prevent a change in our control that is in the best interests of our shareholders.
Our declaration of trust generally does not permit ownership in excess of 9.8% of any class or series of our shares of beneficial interest, and attempts to acquire our shares in excess of the share ownership limits will be ineffective unless an exemption is granted by our Board of Trustees.
Our declaration of trust generally prohibits beneficial or constructive ownership by any person of more than 9.8% in value or by number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of any class or series of our outstanding shares and contains certain other limitations on the ownership and transfer of our shares. Our Board of Trustees, in its sole discretion, may grant an exemption to certain of these prohibitions, subject to certain conditions and receipt by our board of certain representations and undertakings. Our Board of Trustees may from time to time increase this ownership limit for one or more persons and may increase or decrease such limit for all other persons. Any decrease in the ownership limit generally applicable to all shareholders will not be effective for any person whose percentage ownership of our shares is in excess of such decreased ownership limit until such time as such person's percentage ownership of our shares equals or falls below such decreased ownership limit, but any further acquisition of our shares in excess of such decreased ownership limit will be in violation of the decreased ownership limit. Our

Board of Trustees may not increase the ownership limit (whether for one person or all shareholders) if such increase would allow five or fewer individuals to beneficially own more than 49.9% in value of our outstanding shares.
Our declaration of trust's constructive ownership rules are complex and may cause the outstanding shares owned by a group of related individuals or entities to be deemed to be constructively owned by one individual or entity. As a result, the acquisition of less than 9.8% of the outstanding shares of any class or series by an individual or entity could cause that individual or entity to own constructively in excess of 9.8% of the outstanding shares of such class or series and thus violate the ownership limit or other restrictions on ownership and transfer of our shares. Any attempt to own or transfer our common shares or preferred shares (if and when issued) in excess of such ownership limit without the consent of our board of trustees or in a manner that would cause us to be "closely held" under Section 856(h) of the Code (without regard to whether the shares are held during the last half of a taxable year) or otherwise fail to qualify as a REIT will result in the shares being automatically transferred to a trustee for a charitable trust or, if the transfer to the charitable trust is not automatically effective to prevent a violation of the share ownership limits or the restrictions on ownership and transfer of our shares, any such transfer of our shares will be void ab initio. Further, any transfer of our shares that would result in our shares being beneficially owned by fewer than 100 persons will be void ab initio.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Risks
Your investment has various U.S. federal, state, and local income tax risks.
We strongly urge you to consult your own tax advisor concerning the effects of U.S. federal, state, and local income tax law on an investment in our common shares and on your individual tax situation.
Our failure to qualify as a REIT would subject us to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes, which could adversely affect the value of our common shares and would substantially reduce the cash available for distribution to our shareholders.
We believe that, commencing with our short taxable year ended December 31, 2013, we have been organized in conformity with, and have operated in a manner that has enabled us to meet, the requirements for qualification as a REIT under the Code. While we intend to continue to operate in a manner that will enable us to remain qualified as a REIT, we cannot assure you that we will remain qualified as a REIT.
The U.S. federal income tax laws governing REITs are complex, and interpretations of the U.S. federal income tax laws governing qualification as a REIT are limited. Qualifying as a REIT requires us to meet various tests regarding the nature of our assets and our income, the ownership of our outstanding stock, and the amount of our distributions on an ongoing basis. Our ability to satisfy the asset tests depends upon the characterization and fair market values of our assets, some of which are not susceptible to a precise determination. Our compliance with the REIT income and asset tests also depends upon our ability to successfully manage the composition of our income and assets on an ongoing basis. Although we intend to operate so as to maintain our qualifications as a REIT, given the complex nature of the rules governing REITs, the ongoing importance of factual determinations, including the potential tax treatment of the investments we make, and the possibility of future changes in our circumstances, no assurance can be given that our actual results of operations for any particular taxable year will satisfy such requirements.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any calendar year, and do not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, we would be required to pay U.S. federal income tax (and any applicable state and local taxes), including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on our taxable income at regular corporate rates, and dividends paid to our shareholders would not be deductible by us in computing our taxable income (although such dividends received by certain non-corporate U.S. taxpayers generally would be subject to a preferential rate of taxation). Further, if we fail to qualify as a REIT, we might need to borrow money or sell assets in order to pay any resulting tax. Our payment of income tax would decrease the amount of our income available for distribution to our shareholders. Furthermore, if we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we no longer would be required under U.S. federal tax laws to distribute substantially all of our REIT taxable income to our shareholders. Unless our failure to qualify as a REIT was subject to relief under the U.S. federal tax laws, we could not re-elect to qualify as a REIT until the fifth calendar year following the year in which we failed to qualify.
Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forego or liquidate otherwise attractive investments.
To qualify as a REIT, we must continually satisfy various tests regarding the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our shareholders and the ownership of our shares of beneficial interest. In order to meet these tests, we may be required to forego investments we might otherwise make. We may be required to pay dividends to shareholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution, and may be unable to pursue investments that would be otherwise advantageous to us in order to satisfy the source of income or

asset diversification requirements for qualifying as a REIT. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our investment performance.
In particular, we must ensure that at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our total assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified REIT real estate assets, including RMBS. The remainder of our investment in securities (other than government securities and qualified REIT real estate assets) generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our total assets (other than government securities, TRS securities and qualified REIT real estate assets) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, and no more than 25% (20%, beginning in calendar year 2018) of the value of our total assets can be represented by securities of one or more TRSs. Generally, if we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification and becoming subject to U.S. federal income tax (and any applicable state and local taxes) on all of our income. As a result, we may be required to liquidate from our portfolio otherwise attractive investments or contribute such investments to a TRS, in which event they will be subject to regular corporate U.S. federal, state and local taxes assuming that the TRS is organized in the United States. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amounts available for distribution to our shareholders.
Failure to make required distributions would subject us to tax, which would reduce the cash available for distribution to our shareholders.
To qualify as a REIT, we must distribute to our shareholders each calendar year at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (including certain items of non-cash income), determined excluding any net capital gains and without regard to the deduction for dividends paid. To the extent that we satisfy the 90% distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100% of our taxable income, we will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our undistributed income. In addition, we will incur a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which our distributions in any calendar year are less than the sum of:
85% of our REIT ordinary income for that year;
95% of our REIT capital gain net income for that year; and
any undistributed taxable income from prior years.
We intend to distribute our taxable income to our shareholders in a manner intended to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement and to avoid the corporate income tax. However, there is no requirement that TRSs distribute their after-tax net income to their parent REIT.
Our taxable income may substantially exceed our net income as determined based on GAAP, because, for example, realized capital losses will be deducted in determining our GAAP net income, but may not be deductible in computing our taxable income. In addition, we may invest in assets that generate taxable income in excess of economic income or in advance of the corresponding cash flow from the assets. As a result of the foregoing, we may generate less cash flow than taxable income in a particular year. To the extent that we generate such non-cash taxable income in a taxable year, we may incur corporate income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax on that income if we do not distribute such income to shareholders in that year. In that event, we may be required to use cash reserves, incur debt, sell assets, make taxable distributions of our shares or debt securities or liquidate non-cash assets at rates or at times that we regard as unfavorable to satisfy the distribution requirement and to avoid corporate income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax in that year.
Determination of our REIT taxable income involves the application of highly technical and complex Code provisions for which only limited judicial and administrative authorities exist. If the IRS disagrees with our determination, it could affect our satisfaction of the distribution requirement. Under certain circumstances, we may be able to correct a failure to meet the distribution requirement for a year by paying "deficiency dividends" to our shareholders in a later year. We may include such deficiency dividends in our deduction for dividends paid for the earlier year. Although we may be able to avoid income tax on amounts distributed as deficiency dividends, we will be required to pay interest and a penalty to the IRS based upon the amount of any deduction we take for deficiency dividends.
Even if we qualify as a REIT, we may face other tax liabilities that reduce our cash flows.
Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain U.S. federal, state and local taxes on our income and assets, including taxes on any undistributed income, tax on income from some activities conducted as a result of a foreclosure, and state or local income, property and transfer taxes. In addition, any TRSs we form will be subject to regular corporate U.S. federal, state and local taxes. Any of these taxes would decrease cash available for distributions to shareholders.

The failure of RMBS subject to a repurchase agreement to qualify as real estate assets would adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT.
We have entered into repurchase agreements under which we nominally sell certain of our RMBS to a counterparty and simultaneously enter into an agreement to repurchase the sold assets. We believe that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, these transactions will be treated as secured debt and we will be treated as the tax owner of the RMBS that are the subject of any such repurchase agreement, notwithstanding that such agreements may transfer record ownership of such assets to the counterparty during the term of the agreement. It is possible, however, that the IRS could successfully assert that we do not own the RMBS during the term of the repurchase agreement, in which case we could fail to qualify as a REIT.
Our ability to engage in TBA transactions could be limited by the requirements necessary to qualify as a REIT, and we could fail to qualify as a REIT as a result of these investments.
We purchase or sell TBAs primarily for purposes of managing interest rate risk associated with our liabilities under repurchase agreements. We generally treat such TBA purchases and sales as hedging transactions that hedge indebtedness incurred to acquire or carry real estate assets, or "qualifying liability hedges," for REIT purposes. We may, from time to time, opportunistically engage in TBA transactions because we find them attractive on their own. The law is unclear regarding whether income and gains from TBAs that are not qualifying liability hedges are qualifying income for the 75% gross income test and whether TBAs are qualifying assets for the 75% asset test.
To the extent that we engage in TBA transactions that are not qualifying liability hedges for REIT purposes, unless we receive a favorable private letter ruling from the IRS or we are advised by counsel that income and gains from such TBAs should be treated as qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test, we will limit our income and gains from such TBAs and any non-qualifying income to no more than 25% of our gross income for each calendar year. Further, unless we receive a favorable private letter ruling from the IRS or we are advised by counsel that TBAs should be treated as qualifying assets for purposes of the 75% asset test, we will limit our investment in such TBAs and any non-qualifying assets to no more than 25% of our total assets at the end of any calendar quarter and will limit the TBAs held by us that are issued by any one issuer to no more than 5% of our total assets at the end of any calendar quarter. Accordingly, our ability to purchase and sell Agency RMBS through TBAs and to hold or dispose of TBAs, through roll transactions or otherwise, could be limited.
Moreover, even if we are advised by counsel that such TBAs should be treated as qualifying assets or that income and gains from such TBAs should be treated as qualifying income, it is possible that the IRS could successfully take the position that such assets are not qualifying assets and such income is not qualifying income. In that event, we could be subject to a penalty tax or we could fail to qualify as a REIT if (i) the value of our TBAs, together with our other non-qualifying assets for the 75% asset test, exceeded 25% of our total assets at the end of any calendar quarter, (ii) the value of our TBAs issued by any one issuer exceeds 5% of our total assets at the end of any calendar quarter, or (iii) our income and gains from our TBAs that are not qualifying liability hedges, together with our non-qualifying income for the 75% gross income test, exceeded 25% of our gross income for any taxable year.
Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge effectively.
The REIT provisions of the Code substantially limit our ability to hedge. Our aggregate gross income from non-qualifying hedges, fees, and certain other non-qualifying sources cannot exceed 5% of our annual gross income. As a result, we might have to limit our use of advantageous hedging techniques or implement those hedges through a TRS. Any hedging income earned by a TRS would be subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax at regular corporate rates. This could increase the cost of our hedging activities or expose us to greater risks associated with interest rate changes or other changes than we would otherwise want to bear.
Our ownership of and relationship with any TRSs that we form will be limited and a failure to comply with the limits would jeopardize our REIT status and may result in the application of a 100% excise tax.
A REIT may own up to 100% of the stock of one or more TRSs. A TRS may earn income that would not be qualifying income if earned directly by the parent REIT. Both the subsidiary and the REIT must jointly elect to treat the subsidiary as a TRS. A corporation (other than a REIT) of which a TRS directly or indirectly owns more than 35% of the voting power or value of the stock will automatically be treated as a TRS. Overall, no more than 25% of the value of a REIT's total assets (or 20% beginning in calendar year 2018) may consist of stock or securities of one or more TRSs. The TRS rules limit the deductibility of interest paid or accrued by a TRS to its parent REIT to assure that the TRS is subject to an appropriate level of corporate taxation. The rules also impose a 100% excise tax on certain transactions between a TRS and its parent REIT that are not conducted on an arm's-length basis. Any domestic TRS that we may form will pay U.S. federal, state and local income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates, and its after-tax net income will be available for distribution to us but is not required to be distributed to us.

Our ownership limitation may restrict change of control or business combination opportunities in which our shareholders might receive a premium for their common shares.
In order for us to qualify as a REIT for each taxable year after 2013, no more than 50% in value of our outstanding shares may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals during the last half of any calendar year. "Individuals" for this purpose include natural persons, private foundations, some employee benefit plans and trusts, and some charitable trusts. In order to help us qualify as a REIT, among other purposes, our declaration of trust generally prohibits any person from beneficially or constructively owning more than 9.8% in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of any class or series of our shares.
The ownership limitation and other restrictions could have the effect of discouraging a takeover or other transaction in which holders of our common shares might receive a premium for their common shares over the then-prevailing market price or which holders might believe to be otherwise in their best interests.
Dividends payable by REITs do not qualify for the reduced tax rates available for some dividends.
The maximum tax rate applicable to "qualified dividend income" payable to U.S. taxpayers taxed at individual rates is 20%. Dividends payable by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for the reduced rates on qualified dividend income. The more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate qualified dividends could cause investors who are taxed at individual rates to perceive investments in the stocks of REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends treated as qualified dividend income, which could adversely affect the value of the stock of REITs, including our common shares.
We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes that could reduce the market price of our common shares.
At any time, the U.S. federal income tax laws or regulations governing REITs or the administrative interpretations of those laws or regulations may be amended. We cannot predict when or if any new U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation, or any amendment to any existing U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation, will be adopted, promulgated or become effective and any such law, regulation or interpretation may take effect retroactively. In addition, as a result of the recent change in presidential administrations, there may be significant reform of the Code, including significant changes to the taxation of both business entities and individuals. There is a substantial lack of clarity around both the timing and the details of any such tax reform and the impact of any potential tax reform on an investment in us. We cannot assure our shareholders that any such changes will not adversely affect the taxation of a shareholder. We and our shareholders could be adversely affected by any such change in, or any new, U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation.
Certain financing activities may subject us to U.S. federal income tax and could have negative tax consequences for our shareholders.
We currently do not intend to enter into any transactions that could result in our, or a portion of our assets, being treated as a taxable mortgage pool for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If we enter into such a transaction in the future we will be taxable at the highest corporate income tax rate on a portion of the income arising from a taxable mortgage pool, referred to as "excess inclusion income," that is allocable to the percentage of our shares held in record name by disqualified organizations (generally tax-exempt entities that are exempt from the tax on unrelated business taxable income, such as state pension plans and charitable remainder trusts and government entities). In that case, under our declaration of trust, we could reduce distributions to such shareholders by the amount of tax paid by us that is attributable to such shareholder's ownership.
If we were to realize excess inclusion income, IRS guidance indicates that the excess inclusion income would be allocated among our shareholders in proportion to our dividends paid. Excess inclusion income cannot be offset by losses of our shareholders. If the shareholder is a tax-exempt entity and not a disqualified organization, then this income would be fully taxable as unrelated business taxable income under Section 512 of the Code. If the shareholder is a foreign person, it would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the maximum tax rate and withholding will be required on this income without reduction or exemption pursuant to any otherwise applicable income tax treaty.
Our recognition of "phantom" income may reduce a shareholder's after-tax return on an investment in our common shares.
We may recognize taxable income in excess of our economic income, known as phantom income, in the first years that we hold certain investments, and experience an offsetting excess of economic income over our taxable income in later years. As a result, shareholders at times may be required to pay U.S. federal income tax on distributions taxable as dividends that economically represent a return of capital rather than a dividend. These distributions would be offset in later years by

distributions that would be treated as returns of capital for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Taking into account the time value of money, this acceleration of U.S. federal income tax liabilities may reduce a shareholder's after-tax return on his or her investment to an amount less than the after-tax return on an investment with an identical before-tax rate of return that did not generate phantom income.
Liquidation of our assets may jeopardize our REIT qualification.
To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must comply with requirements regarding our assets and our sources of income. If we are compelled to liquidate our assets to repay obligations to our lenders or for other reasons, we may be unable to comply with these requirements, thereby jeopardizing our qualification as a REIT, or we may be subject to a 100% tax on any resultant gain if we sell assets that are treated as inventory or property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business.
Our qualification as a REIT and exemption from U.S. federal income tax with respect to certain assets may be dependent on the accuracy of legal opinions or advice rendered or given or statements by the issuers of assets that we acquire, and the inaccuracy of any such opinions, advice or statements may adversely affect our REIT qualification and result in significant corporate-level tax.
When purchasing securities, we may rely on opinions or advice of counsel for the issuer of such securities, or statements made in related offering documents, for purposes of determining whether such securities represent debt or equity securities for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the value of such securities, and also to what extent those securities constitute qualified real estate assets for purposes of the REIT asset tests and produce income which qualifies under the 75% gross income test. The inaccuracy of any such opinions, advice or statements may adversely affect our REIT qualification and result in significant corporate-level tax.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
We do not own any properties. Our principal offices are located in leased space at 53 Forest Avenue, Old Greenwich, CT 06870. The offices of our Manager and Ellington are at the same location. As part of our management agreement, our Manager is responsible for providing offices necessary for all operations, and accordingly, all lease responsibilities belong to our Manager.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Neither we nor Ellington nor its affiliates (including our Manager) are currently subject to any legal proceedings that we or our Manager consider material. Nevertheless, we and Ellington and its affiliates operate in highly regulated markets that currently are under intense regulatory scrutiny, and Ellington and its affiliates have received, and we expect in the future that we and they may receive, inquiries and requests for documents and information from various federal, state and foreign regulators. For example, in January 2017, an affiliate of Ellington received a subpoena from the SEC requesting documents, communications, and other information relating primarily to a loan originator and the loans originated by such originator, such affiliate's analyses of such loans, the purchases and securitizations of such loans by such affiliate and by certain third parties, and the servicing of such loans. Ellington has advised us that, at the present time, it is not aware that any material legal proceeding against us or Ellington or its affiliates is contemplated in connection with any such inquiries or requests. We and Ellington cannot provide any assurance that these or any future such inquiries and requests will not result in further investigation of or the initiation of a proceeding against us or Ellington or its affiliates or that, if any such investigation or proceeding were to arise, it would not materially adversely affect us. For a discussion of certain risks to which we or Ellington or its affiliates could be exposed as a result of inquiries or requests for documents and information received by us or Ellington or its affiliates, see "Risk Factors—We or Ellington or its affiliates may be subject to regulatory inquiries or proceedings" included in Part 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.

PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Shareholders Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
Our common shares have been listed on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "EARN" since May 1, 2013. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices for our common shares:
  Common Stock Sales Price
2016: High Low
First Quarter $12.90
 $9.57
Second Quarter $13.30
 $11.72
Third Quarter $14.43
 $12.84
Fourth Quarter $13.92
 $12.21
2015:    
First Quarter $16.99
 $15.81
Second Quarter $16.70
 $14.23
Third Quarter $14.71
 $11.63
Fourth Quarter $13.44
 $11.36
The closing price for our common shares on March 10, 2017, was $14.04.
Holders of Our Common Shares
Based upon a review of a securities position listing as of March 3, 2016, we had an aggregate of 102 holders of record and holders of our common shares who are nominees for an undetermined number of beneficial owners.
Dividends
To qualify as a REIT, we must distribute annually to our shareholders an amount at least equal to 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined excluding any net capital gains and without regard to the deduction for dividends paid. We currently expect to distribute substantially all of our REIT taxable income to our shareholders. We will be subject to income tax on our taxable income that is not distributed and to an excise tax to the extent that certain percentages of our taxable income are not distributed by specified dates.
We pay dividends only upon the authorization of our Board of Trustees. Our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders will depend upon the performance of our investment portfolio, and, in turn, upon our Manager's management of our business. Dividends will be paid in cash to the extent that cash is available for distribution. We may not be able to generate sufficient net interest income to pay dividends to our shareholders. In addition, our Board of Trustees may change our distribution policy in the future. 
To the extent that our cash available for distribution is less than the amount required to be distributed under the REIT provisions of the Code, we may consider various funding sources to cover any shortfall, including selling certain of our assets, borrowing funds, or using a portion of the net proceeds we receive from offerings of our common shares (and thus all or a portion of such distributions may constitute a return of capital for U.S. federal income tax purposes). We also may elect to pay all or a portion of any dividend in the form of a taxable distribution of our shares or debt securities.

The following table sets forth the dividends per share we have paid to our shareholders with respect to the periods indicated.
Dividend
Per Share
Record DatePayment Date
For the year ended December 31, 2016:
First Quarter$0.45March 31, 2016April 25, 2016
Second Quarter$0.40June 30, 2016July 27, 2016
Third Quarter$0.40September 30, 2016October 25, 2016
Fourth Quarter$0.40December 30, 2016January 25, 2017
For the year ended December 31, 2015:
First Quarter$0.55March 31, 2015April 27, 2015
Second Quarter$0.55June 30, 2015July 27, 2015
Third Quarter$0.45September 30, 2015October 26, 2015
Fourth Quarter$0.45December 31, 2015January 25, 2016
We cannot assure you that we will pay any future dividends to our shareholders and the dividends set forth in the table above are not intended to be indicative of the amount and timing of future dividends, if any.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2016 with respect to compensation plans under which equity securities of our Company are authorized for issuance. We have no such plans that were not approved by our shareholders.
Plan Category Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a) Weighted-average exercise price of our outstanding options, warrants and rights (b) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 16,395
(1) 
 N/A 229,001
(2) 
(1)There are 16,395 restricted Common Shares outstanding pursuant to our 2013 Equity Incentive Plan.
(2)The number of Common Shares that may be issued under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan will be increased in an amount that results from multiplying 3% and the total number of Common Shares sold in any future public or private offering of our Common Shares, subject to a maximum of 1,500,000 shares.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
Pursuant to our 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, on December 13, 2016, we granted 3,858 restricted shares to our partially dedicated employees. The restricted shares are subject to forfeiture restrictions that will lapse with respect to 2,302 of the shares on December 13, 2017 and 1,556 of the shares on December 13, 2018. Such grants were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act based on the exemption provided in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.

Performance
This performance graph is furnished and shall not be deemed filed with the SEC or subject to Section 18 of the Exchange Act, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
The following graph provides a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common shares to the cumulative total return on the Standard & Poor's 500 Composite Stock Price Index, or the "S&P 500," and the FTSE National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts Mortgage REIT Index, or the "FTSE NAREIT MREIT." The comparison is for the period from May 1, 2013, the day our common shares commenced trading on the NYSE, to December 31, 2016, and assumes in each case, a $100 investment on May 1, 2013 and the reinvestment of dividends.
The actual cumulative total returns shown on the graph above are as follows:
 
May 1,
2013
 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2015 December 31, 2016
Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT$100.00
 $85.95
 $103.55
 $90.63
 $108.46
S&P 500$100.00
 $118.52
 $134.73
 $136.58
 $152.91
FTSE NAREIT MREIT$100.00
 $83.44
 $98.34
 $89.69
 $110.17
The performance information above has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but neither its accuracy or completeness can be guaranteed. The historical information set forth above is not necessarily indicative of future performance. Accordingly, we do not make or endorse any predictions as to future share performance.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following table presents selected consolidated financial information as of December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013, and 2012, and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013 and the period from September 25, 2012 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2012. The consolidated financial information presented below as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, has been derived from our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated financial information as of December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, and the year ended December 31, 2013 and for the period from September 25, 2012 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2012, was derived from our historical audited consolidated financial statements not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Since the information presented below is only selected financial data and does not provide all of the information

contained in our historical consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the related notes, you should read it in conjunction with "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," and our historical consolidated financial statements, including the related notes to our consolidated financial statements, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Condensed Statement of Operations
(In thousands except for per share amounts) Year Ended
December 31, 2016		 Year Ended
December 31, 2015		 
Year Ended
December 31, 2014
 
Year Ended
December 31, 2013
 
September 25, 2012 (commencement of operations) to
December 31, 2012
Net Interest Income          
Net interest income $24,224
 $34,515
 $42,313
 $24,810
 $239
Expenses          
Management fees 2,129
 2,304
 2,285
 2,066
 124
Professional fees 668
 574
 986
 624
 125
Compensation expense 599
 621
 678
 401
 —
Organizational expenses —
 —
 —
 —
 568
Other operating expenses 1,613
 1,646
 1,803
 1,235
 45
Total Expenses 5,009
 5,145
 5,752
 4,326
 862
Other Income (Loss)          
Net realized and change in net unrealized gains (losses) on securities (1,676) (9,327) 51,007
 (63,602) 87
Net realized and change in net unrealized gains (losses) on financial derivatives (5,633) (20,013) (71,400) 41,204
 —
Total Other Income (Loss) (7,309) (29,340) (20,393) (22,398) 87
Net Income (Loss) $11,906
 $30
 $16,168
 $(1,914) $(536)
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share $1.31
 $—
 $1.77
 $(0.29) $(0.33)
Cash Dividends Declared Per Common Share $1.65
 $2.00
 $2.20
 $1.14
 $—

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
  As of December 31,
(In thousands except for share amounts) 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Assets          
Cash and cash equivalents $33,504
 $40,166
 $45,237
 $50,112
 $18,161
Mortgage-backed securities, at fair value 1,226,994
 1,242,266
 1,393,303
 1,326,036
 13,596
Due from brokers 49,518
 33,297
 18,531
 18,347
 —
Financial derivatives–assets, at fair value 6,008
 2,183
 3,072
 34,963
 —
Reverse repurchase agreements 75,012
 78,632
 13,987
 —
 —
Receivable for securities sold 33,199
 155,526
 41,834
 76,692
 —
Other assets 4,899
 4,614
 5,110
 4,940
 399
Total Assets $1,429,134
 $1,556,684
 $1,521,074
 $1,511,090
 $32,156
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity          
Liabilities          
Repurchase agreements $1,197,973
 $1,222,719
 $1,323,080
 $1,310,347
 $—
Payable for securities purchased 5,516
 98,949
 4,227
 2,776
 —
Due to brokers 1,055
 439
 583
 22,788
 —
Financial derivatives–liabilities, at fair value 1,975
 4,725
 8,700
 1,069
 —
U.S. Treasury securities sold short, at fair value 74,194
 78,447
 13,959
 —
 —
Dividend payable 3,652
 4,111
 5,032
 4,570
 —
Other liabilities 3,092
 2,439
 2,128
 2,360
 1,192
Total Liabilities 1,287,457
 1,411,829
 1,357,709
 1,343,910
 1,192
Shareholders' Equity          
Preferred shares, par value $0.01 per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized; (0 shares issued and outstanding, respectively) —
 —
 —
 —
 —
Common shares, par value $0.01 per share, 500,000,000 shares authorized; (9,130,897, 9,135,103, 9,149,274, 9,139,842 and 1,633,378 shares issued and outstanding, respectively) 92
 92
 91
 91
 16
Additional paid-in-capital 180,996
 181,027
 181,282
 181,147
 32,674
Accumulated deficit (39,411) (36,264) (18,008) (14,058) (1,726)
Total Shareholders' Equity 141,677
 144,855
 163,365
 167,180
 30,964
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity $1,429,134
 $1,556,684
 $1,521,074
 $1,511,090
 $32,156
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Executive Summary
We are a Maryland real estate investment trust, or "REIT," formed in August 2012 that specializes in acquiring, investing in, and managing residential mortgage- and real estate-related assets. Our primary objective is to generate attractive current yields and risk-adjusted total returns for our shareholders by making investments that we believe compensate us appropriately for the risks associated with them. We seek to attain this objective by constructing and actively managing a portfolio comprised primarily of residential mortgage-backed securities, or "RMBS," for which the principal and interest payments are guaranteed by a U.S. government agency or a U.S. government-sponsored entity, or "Agency RMBS," and, to a lesser extent, RMBS that do not carry such guarantees, or "non-Agency RMBS," such as RMBS backed by prime jumbo, Alternative A-paper, manufactured housing, and subprime residential mortgage loans. We also may opportunistically acquire and manage other types of residential mortgage-related and real estate-related asset classes, such as residential mortgage loans, and mortgage servicing rights, or "MSRs." We believe that being able to combine Agency RMBS with non-Agency RMBS and other residential mortgage- and real estate-related asset classes enables us to balance a range of mortgage-related risks.
We were formed through an initial strategic venture among affiliates of Ellington, an investment management firm and

registered investment adviser with a 22-year history of investing in a broad spectrum of MBS and related derivatives, with an emphasis on the RMBS market, and the Blackstone Tactical Opportunity Funds, or the "Blackstone Funds." As of December 31, 2016, the Blackstone Funds owned approximately 29% of our outstanding common shares.
We are externally managed and advised by our Manager, an affiliate of Ellington.
We use leverage in our Agency RMBS strategy and, while we have not done so meaningfully to date, we may use leverage in our non-Agency RMBS strategy as well, although we expect such leverage to be lower. We have financed our purchases of Agency RMBS exclusively through repurchase agreements, which we account for as collateralized borrowings. As of December 31, 2016, we had outstanding borrowings under repurchase agreements in the amount of $1.2 billion with thirteen counterparties.
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on our taxable income that we distribute currently to our shareholders as long as we maintain our qualification as a REIT. We intend to conduct our operations so that neither we nor any of our subsidiaries is required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.
As of December 31, 2016, our book value per share was $15.52 as compared to $15.86 as of December 31, 2015.
Trends and Recent Market Developments
Key trends and recent market developments for the MBS market include the following:
U.S. Federal Reserve and U.S. Monetary Policy—In December 2016, the Federal Reserve raised its target range for the federal funds rate by 0.25%, but maintained its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its U.S. Treasury security and Agency RMBS holdings;
Housing and Mortgage Market Statistics—Data released by S&P Dow Jones Indices for its S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller Indices for November showed a continuation of mid-single-digit home price appreciation nationally; meanwhile, the Freddie Mac survey 30-year mortgage rate ended the fourth quarter of 2016 at 4.32%, rising from 3.42% at the end of the third quarter of 2016;
Prepayment Rate Trends—Following the post-election surge in interest rates, prepayment rates fell at the end of 2016, and have continued to fall in the beginning of 2017;
GSE and Government Agency Developments—The FHFA and the GSEs continued to announce program and policy changes and clarifications intended to increase mortgage credit availability;
Portfolio Overview and Outlook—Accommodative monetary policies of global central banks pushed yields on sovereign bonds lower during the first three quarters of 2016, forcing investors to seek relatively higher yields from other liquid sectors, including Agency RMBS. The fourth quarter of 2016 was characterized by sharply higher interest rates and high market volatility, especially in the aftermath of the U.S. elections. During the fourth quarter, Agency RMBS prices declined in line with the movements in interest rates and volatility, and for the full year, our portfolio performed well despite the challenges presented by heightened interest rate volatility. Non-Agency RMBS performed well over the course of the year, as securities continued to appreciate in price as a result of constrained supply and continued demand.
Federal Reserve and U.S. Monetary Policy
On December 14, 2016, the Federal Open Market Committee, or "FOMC," announced that it would raise the target range for the federal funds rate by 0.25%, to 0.50%-0.75%. This was the first announcement of an increase in the target range for the federal funds rate since December 16, 2015. On February 1, 2017, the FOMC announced that it would maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 0.50%-0.75%. In its February statement following the meeting, the FOMC indicated that economic activity has continued to expand at a moderate pace, and the labor market has continued to strengthen. The FOMC also stated that it expects that with gradual adjustments in the stance of monetary policy, the expansion of economic activity will continue at a moderate pace and labor market conditions will strengthen somewhat further. Additionally, the FOMC indicated that it expects economic conditions to evolve in such a way that only gradual increases in the federal funds rate will be warranted, and that the federal funds rate is likely to remain, for some time, below prevailing longer run levels. Minutes from the February meeting of the FOMC indicated that many officials expressed the view that it might be appropriate to raise the federal funds rate again fairly soon if incoming information on the labor market and inflation was in line with or stronger than their current expectations, or if the risks of overshooting the committee's maximum employment and inflation objectives increased.
Over the course of the fourth quarter, the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield increased by 85 basis points, from 1.59% as of September 30, 2016 to 2.44% as of December 30, 2016. The rise in long-term interest rates during the fourth quarter was the

largest quarterly increase since the financial crisis, and one of the largest quarterly increases ever. We believe that there remains substantial risk that interest rates will increase from current levels, driven by a tightening of Federal Reserve monetary policy in response to employment and economic growth in the United States and other factors. The risk of rising interest rates reinforces the importance of our ability, subject to our qualifying and maintaining our qualification as a REIT, to hedge interest rate risk in both our Agency RMBS and non-Agency MBS portfolios using a variety of tools, including TBAs, interest rate swaps, and various other instruments. Additional uncertainty surrounds the Federal Reserve's timeline to curtail its reinvestment of principal payments from its U.S. Treasury security and Agency RMBS holdings. The current pace of monthly reinvestments under this program is approximately $25 billion, thus providing significant market support.
Housing and Mortgage Market Statistics
The following table demonstrates the decline in residential mortgage delinquencies and foreclosure inventory on a national level, as reported by CoreLogic in its December 2016 National Foreclosure Report:
  As of
Number of Units (In thousands)
 December 2016 September 2016
Seriously Delinquent Mortgages(1)
 1,027
 1,039
Foreclosure Inventory 329
 341
(1)Seriously Delinquent Mortgages are ninety days and over in delinquency and include foreclosures and real estate owned, or "REO," property.
As the above table indicates, both the number of seriously delinquent mortgages and the number of homes in foreclosure have continued to decline. This decline supports the thesis that as many homeowners have re-established equity in their homes through recovering real estate prices, they have become less likely to become delinquent and default on their mortgages.
Monthly housing starts provide another indicator of market fundamentals. The following table shows the trailing three-month average housing starts for the periods referenced:
  As of
Number of Units (In thousands)
 December 2016 September 2016
Single-family 834
 758
Multi-family 406
 374
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
As of December 2016, average single-family housing starts during the trailing three months increased by 10.0%as compared to September 2016, while multi-family housing starts increased by approximately 8.6% during the same period.
Data released by S&P Dow Jones Indices for its S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller Indices for December 2016 showed that, on average, home prices posted a 5.6% year-over-year increase for its 20-City Composite and a 4.9% year-over-year increase for its 10-City Composite, after seasonal adjustments.Additionally, as indicated in the table above, as of December 2016, the national inventory of foreclosed homes fell to 329,000 units; this represented the sixty-second consecutive month with a year-over-year decline. As a result, there are many fewer unsold foreclosed homes hanging over the housing market than there were a year ago. We believe that near-term home price trends are more likely to be driven by fundamental factors such as economic growth, mortgage rates, and affordability, rather than by technical factors such as shadow inventory. Shadow inventory represents the number of properties that are seriously delinquent, in foreclosure, or held as REO by mortgage servicers, but not currently listed on a multiple listing service.
On February 3, 2017, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, or "BLS," reported that, in January 2017, the U.S. unemployment rate was 4.8%, down from 4.9% a year earlier and at levels generally considered consistent with an economy near full employment. In light of the drop in the labor force participation rate since the financial crisis, another, perhaps more relevant, measure of labor market conditions is employment growth. The BLS also reported that non-farm payrolls rose by 227,000 in January 2017. Over the past three months, job gains have averaged 183,000 per month.
While it is difficult to quantify the relationship between employment data and the housing and mortgage markets, we believe that current levels of unemployment and job creation are generally supportive of the housing market. While the housing market is also currently supported by low mortgage rates, it faces a number of potential headwinds. These include high interest rate volatility, the constraining effects of still-tight credit standards on both housing starts and new loan originations, and the uneven pace of the recovery of the U.S. economy.

Prepayment Rate Trends
The Mortgage Bankers Association's Refinance Index, which measures refinancing application volumes, declined rapidly following the U.S. elections, and reached a multi-year low on December 23, 2016. Because of the time lag between when a refinancing application is submitted and when the refinancing is actually completed, the December MBS prepayment data only partially reflected the drop in refinancing application volume. Factors that continue to inhibit prepayment activity include: (i) home price declines during the financial crisis, which has left some borrowers with minimal or negative home equity; (ii) more restrictive underwriting guidelines, even for refinancings; and (iii) increased origination costs, especially related to underwriting and compliance, in part as originators continue to contend with the TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure, or "TRID," regulations that started in later 2015. More recently, increases in mortgage banking industry staffing, improvements in technology, and modest relaxations in underwriting standards may be serving to offset a portion of these inhibitions on prepayment activity. The foregoing factors and developments have resulted in substantial variations in prepayment rates between Agency pools as a function of loan-to-value, or "LTV," ratio, loan balance, credit score, loan servicer, geography, property type, loan purpose, and other factors. In recognition of the importance of these underlying characteristics on prepayment behavior, the MBS market continues to promote the creation of "specified" Agency pools that emphasize or de-emphasize many of these characteristics, such as pools where the principal balance of every underlying mortgage loan is below $85,000. The Making Homes Affordable, or "MHA," refinancing program, which was initiated in response to the housing market crisis, has facilitated the origination of many of these kinds of specified Agency pools. We expect that the ongoing origination of Agency pools with a wide variety of loan characteristics will continue to create opportunities for us to exploit the resulting differences in prepayments.
While refinancing activity overall has been slower in recent periods relative to earlier periods when mortgage rates were at comparable levels, recent trends suggest an ongoing divergence between the refinancing behavior of lower balance loans and higher balance loans. As illustrated in the figure below, the average loan size of refinance applications, especially during refinancing waves, has increased over the past several years. For example, in July 2016, at the peak of the most recent refinancing wave, the average refinance application loan size was $288,400, a 35% increase over the average refinance application loan size of $213,700 in May 2013, at the peak of the early 2013 refinancing wave. This increase in average loan sizes of mortgage refinances is reflective of a number of changes related to borrower behavior and mortgage credit availability in recent years.
Source: Freddie Mac and Mortgage Bankers Association

As shown in the figure above, higher loan balance borrowers tend to be more reactive to refinancing incentives, especially following steep declines in rates over a short period. After swift drops in mortgage rates in October 2014, January 2015, March 2015, the first six weeks of 2016 and late June 2016, the average refinanced loan size spiked, reflecting a surge in higher loan balance borrowers reacting to the recent decline in mortgage rates. This greater prepayment sensitivity for higher loan size borrowers is well established, and is due in part to greater awareness among such borrowers about refinancing opportunities, as well as greater absolute dollar incentives to refinance relative to lower loan size borrowers.
Moreover, while overall mortgage credit availability continues to increase from the depressed levels that followed the financial crisis, credit availability for higher loan size borrowers has been particularly improving recently. In the past several years, a number of the largest lenders, including Bank of America, JP Morgan, Wells Fargo, and PNC Bank, have noticeably loosened lending standards for jumbo mortgage loans typically sought by more affluent borrowers, including lowering minimum FICO requirements and raising maximum LTVs. Affluent borrowers have also generally experienced greater improvements in their creditworthiness, thanks to rising asset prices and a strong rebound in high-end home prices, especially in wealthier cities such as New York and San Francisco. Jumbo mortgage loans have been a rare bright spot for the non-Agency mortgage origination sector in recent years, and for good reason given the excellent credit performance of jumbo mortgage loans originated since the financial crisis. Many banks are also competing more vigorously for affluent customers, in an effort to cross-sell other financial products such as investment and brokerage services. This competition has resulted in a narrowing of the spread between jumbo mortgage rates and conforming mortgage rates, further increasing the relative refinancing incentive for jumbo mortgage loans.
While in the past few years more affluent and higher credit score borrowers have seen the largest increase in mortgage credit availability, more recently first time homebuyers, low-income borrowers, and borrowers in low-income areas have started to benefit from an increase in high LTV mortgage lending programs targeted at these demographic groups. While recent growth is still relatively modest in these largely government-funded or non-profit-funded lending programs for less affluent borrowers, it may prefigure future expansions of credit to higher LTV borrowers.
In addition, since the financial crisis, financial reforms, including the Dodd-Frank Act and qualified mortgage, or "QM," mortgage rules, have dramatically increased the costs of underwriting, especially for niche products such as second lien and adjustable rate mortgages. Banks have reduced their footprint in the mortgage lending space as the scars of the financial crisis and higher capital requirements have increased the costs of doing business. More recently, market share has shifted to non-bank lenders, which do not face the same regulatory capital requirements as banks for servicing mortgages, and which possess superior technology to better assist borrowers in making more efficient refinancing decisions.
The shift in mortgage banking industry market share to more efficient non-bank lenders has contributed to the increase in aggregate prepayment speeds. For example, Quicken Loans Inc., or "Quicken," has become one of the leaders in efficient mortgage refinancing in recent years. As shown in the figure below, prepayment speeds on Quicken loans are among some of the fastest in the industry; however, Quicken may not continue to be the outlier that it used to be, as improved technology continues to be adopted by other lenders. In the figure below, we show the 3-month constant prepayment rate, or "CPR," for Freddie Mac 30-year fixed rate mortgages with original loan balances between $200,000 and $400,000, loan ages between 12 and 47 months, and with interest rates that are 50 to 100 basis points above then current market rates. While in recent years Quicken prepayment speeds were consistently as much as 10 to 20 CPR faster than those of other servicers during prepayment spikes, this differential has almost entirely evaporated in the past few months. Ultimately, technology-driven, industrywide increases in prepayment efficiency may put pressure on MBS prices and/or reduce the excess yield spread enjoyed by MBS investors.
As improved technology spreads, we believe that the lending industry will change in two important ways. First, more efficient mortgage origination should mean that some cost savings will be passed on to borrowers. Smaller-balance loans, which are disproportionately used by lower-income borrowers, should respond the most from a reduction in the fixed components of origination costs. Second, borrower prepayment behavior should become increasingly efficient, as demonstrated by the higher prepayment speeds of mortgage loans serviced by Quicken and other non-bank mortgage originators. Assessing the ongoing evolution of these industrywide changes, including studying servicer-specific trends, is of increasing importance in investing in both specified pools and TBAs.

Source: Freddie Mac
GSE/Government Agency Developments
On October 19, 2016, Ginnie Mae announced a new rule to discourage rapid streamline refinancing of loans in Ginnie Mae pools. Effective February 1, 2017, any streamline-refinanced loan that was less than six months old at the time of refinancing will automatically be ineligible for inclusion in TBA-deliverable Ginnie Mae pools. Recent developments in Ginnie Mae pools involving the rapid refinancing by certain non-bank lenders of a small number of VA-guaranteed loans, often originated at above-market interest rates, have raised concerns about the impact of multiple, rapid refinance transactions on borrower equity and financing costs. These rapid refinancings had been weighing on the prices of certain Ginnie Mae pools, and the new rule should help maintain investor confidence in the Ginnie Mae program.
On October 24, 2016, Fannie Mae announced details of a new "Day 1 certainty" program, available in December, to waive property inspections and provide income and employment representation and warranty relief for certain low-risk loans. The program should reduce closing costs and shorten refinance lead times, leading to a marginal increase in reactivity and prepayment speeds, as well as potentially providing more credit availability for first-time homebuyers who face the greatest paperwork challenges in documenting income and employment. A similar Freddie Mac program had been previously announced and will debut in spring 2017. The combined effect of these programs depends critically on lender take-up, although most lenders seem to be receptive to the programs.
On December 8, 2016, FHFA announced that the initial phase, called Release 1, of the Common Securitization Platform, or "CSP," had been successfully implemented on November 21, 2016. With the implementation, Freddie Mac converted to using the CSP for many of the major activities related to current single-class, fixed-rate, mortgage-backed securities. The next phase of the CSP, known as Release 2, will involve the actual issuance by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae of a common, single mortgage-backed security, to be called the Uniform Mortgage-Backed Security, or "UMBS." The FHFA expects to announce a timeframe for the implementation of Release 2 in the first quarter of 2017. The FHFA's goal in establishing the UMBS is to create a single set of standards and a single market for GSE-issued fixed-rate mortgage loans, and thereby to create and maintain a more liquid Agency MBS market, consistent with the FHFA's statutory obligation of providing for the liquidity of the national housing finance market.
On January 9, 2017, the FHA announced that it would reduce its annual mortgage insurance premiums, or "MIPs," by 25 basis points for most new mortgages with a closing/disbursement date on or after January 27, 2017; this would reestablish the insurance premiums nearly at pre-crisis levels.  This announcement was largely unexpected, especially after comments made on November 15, 2016 by Ed Golding, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development assistant secretary, who indicated

that no additional MIP cut was coming. Since 2009, the FHA has increased MIPs several times to help stabilize the health of its Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund, which has been badly depleted by the financial crisis. However, the new administration canceled the MIP reduction on January 20, 2017 (its first day in office), citing a need for more analysis and research. The rollback of the MIP reduction indicates that the new administration may want to reevaluate the government's role in housing policy.
To date, no definitive legislation has been enacted with respect to a possible unwinding of the GSEs or a material reduction in their roles in the U.S. mortgage market. However, U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has indicated that reform of the GSEs will be a priority for the new administration. There have been several proposals offered by members of Congress, including the Corker-Warner bill introduced in June 2013, the Johnson-Crapo bill introduced in March 2014, the Partnership to Strengthen Homeownership Act introduced in July 2014, and a Senate draft bill introduced in May 2015 by Senator Richard Shelby that pushes for increased credit risk transfers to private investors. To date, the GSEs have engaged predominantly in "second-loss" risk sharing transactions, where the GSEs bear losses on their mortgage pools up to a capped amount first, before private investors bear any losses. Furthermore, these risk sharing transactions to date have generally been "back-end" transactions, where the GSE seeks to offload its risk only after it has actually issued guarantees on a defined pool of mortgages. Under the Shelby bill, not only would the GSEs be required to engage in significant and increasing levels of risk sharing transactions generally, but for the first time the GSEs would be required to engage both in "first-loss" risk sharing transactions and in "front-end" risk sharing transactions. Many of these proposed bills could potentially increase private capital flows to the mortgage sector while reducing taxpayer risk. Though it appears unlikely that any of these bills will be passed in their current form, features may be incorporated into future proposals.
Portfolio Overview and Outlook
General Market Overview
In the first quarter of 2016, credit-related fears stemming from depressed energy prices initially spurred a rapid equity market sell-off that spilled over to many sectors, and also caused a flight to quality that pushed interest rates sharply lower. The response from global central banks was swift, with announcements of both increased quantitative easing programs and more dovish interest rate outlooks; this caused equity markets to rally back and at the same time kept interest rates from rebounding fully. Interest rates trended slightly higher and volatility declined for most of the second quarter, but following the United Kingdom's vote in June to leave the European Union, with the associated concerns of a negative impact on the global economy, interest rates sharply reversed course and dropped dramatically. However, as had occurred earlier in the year, additional global central bank intervention quickly supplied relief to the financial markets. With yields on sovereign bonds reaching record low levels, many investors sought higher yields from other liquid sectors, including Agency RMBS.
The fourth quarter of 2016 was characterized by sharply higher interest rates and increased market volatility, especially in the aftermath of the U.S. elections in November. The election of Donald Trump to the U.S. presidency along with continued Republican control of Congress led to a surge in interest rates, as many market participants predicted that the policy goals of the new administration would lead to an acceleration in U.S. economic growth. Among the shared policy goals of the new administration and Congress are a lowering of corporate income tax rates, increased infrastructure spending, and a roll-back in regulation, such as many of the regulations included in the Dodd-Frank Act. The rise in long-term interest rates during the fourth quarter was the largest quarterly increase since the financial crisis, and one of the largest quarterly increases ever. Over the course of the fourth quarter of 2016, the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield rose 85 basis points to end the year at 2.44%, and closed as high as 2.60% on December 15th. The yield curve steepened substantially during the fourth quarter, with the 2-year U.S. Treasury yield rising 43 basis points to end the quarter at 1.19%. The 10-year and 2-year U.S. Treasury yields began 2016 at 2.27% and 1.05%, respectively.
In December 2016, for the first time since late 2015 and only the second time in over ten years, the Federal Reserve increased its target range for the federal funds rate. Following the rate increase in late 2015 and heading into 2016, most market participants had anticipated multiple target range increases for 2016, but concerns around a global economic slowdown, as well as mixed data regarding the state of the U.S. economy, led the Federal Reserve to adopt a more measured stance in 2016. The recent change in administrations now presents the Federal Reserve with conflicting considerations: an increase in inflation appears more likely, which would call for monetary tightening, but the uncertainties associated with possible large scale government policy changes may call for a more cautious approach.
For most of 2016 mortgage rates trended lower, but they surged in the fourth quarter in sympathy with overall interest rates. Ultimately, the Freddie Mac survey 30-year mortgage rate ended 2016 at 4.32%, or 0.31% higher than where it began the year. The Mortgage Bankers Association Refinance Index, which tracks the volume of mortgage loan refinancing applications, reached a one-year high on July 8, 2016 and then declined over 50%, falling back to its early-2016 levels by the end of the year.

Agency
As of December 31, 2016, the value of our long Agency bond portfolio was $1.208 billion, as compared to $1.211 billion as of December 31, 2015.
Our Agency RMBS portfolio consisted principally of "specified pools." Specified pools are fixed rate Agency pools with special characteristics, such as pools containing low loan balance mortgages, pools containing mortgages backed by investor properties, pools containing mortgages originated through the government-sponsored MHA refinancing programs, and pools containing mortgages with various other characteristics.
Over the course of most of the first three quarters of 2016, high demand from both domestic and overseas investors, bolstered prices of Agency RMBS. The relative yields and liquidity of these instruments increased what had been already high investor demand for them. However, as a result of the surge in interest rates in the fourth quarter, Agency RMBS declined substantially in price and their durations extended, exacerbating further price declines. For example, during the fourth quarter, TBA 30-year Fannie Mae 3.5s, a widely traded Agency RMBS, declined approximately three points in price, and its duration roughly doubled. Nevertheless, the price declines were relatively muted when compared to prior instances of large-scale increases in interest rates, such as those that occurred in mid-2013, or before the financial crisis. This more muted response was in large part a consequence of the progressive shift, in recent years, in ownership of Agency RMBS away from "delta-hedgers" such as the GSEs and many money managers and mortgage REITs, who have often reacted to big downswings in the market by aggressively selling Agency RMBS, and towards "buy and hold" investors such as the Federal Reserve and depository institutions.
Low mortgage rates during the first three quarters of 2016 led to increases in refinancing activity, and by late summer overall prepayment rates reached their highest levels since 2013. As mortgage rates increased over the course of the fourth quarter, Agency RMBS prepayment rates slowed. However, the pace of the slowdown in Agency RMBS prepayment rates during the fourth quarter was much more gradual than most sell-side research had predicted. A variety of factors helped to support prepayment activity during 2016, including the gradual loosening of mortgage credit underwriting standards relative to the immediate aftermath of the financial crisis; enhanced originator/servicer technology and infrastructure, which have streamlined the refinancing process and augmented refinancing capacity; employment in the mortgage industry, which remains at a post-financial crisis high; and increasing home prices and improvements in borrower credit profiles, both of which reflect continued improvement in the U.S. economy.
Although specified pools with prepayment protection features also experienced increases in overall prepayment speeds during most of 2016, such increases were significantly less than that of generic pools, and accounted for the relative outperformance of specified pools as compared to generic pools. Specified pools with prepayment protection features include loans with low principal balances, for example. Such loans generally show much more muted prepayment responses to lower mortgage rates, as the savings from refinancing low balance loans are lower on an absolute basis, and the costs to refinance are higher relative to those savings. Our Agency RMBS portfolio, which remains concentrated in specified pools with prepayment protection features, was well insulated from the large increase in generic pool prepayment rates during the year. We believe that specified pools will continue to outperform generic pools as the presence of the Federal Reserve (which focuses its purchases on generic pools) shrinks in the Agency RMBS market and as technological advances in the mortgage origination and servicing industry have tended to have a much greater impact on non-specified pools as compared to specified pools, driving greater investor interest in specified pools relative to TBAs. We believe that this trend will continue.
Our portfolio performed well over the course of the year, despite the challenges presented by the heightened interest rate volatility. Our aggregate Agency RMBS portfolio generated interest income of $31.0 million, and—especially as compared to prior years—a relatively small portion of this interest income was offset by net realized and unrealized losses on our securities and financial derivatives portfolio. For the year ended December 31, 2016, we had total net realized and unrealized losses of $(2.9) million, or $(0.32) per share, on our aggregate Agency RMBS portfolio, while we had total net realized and unrealized losses of $(5.9) million, or $(0.65) per share, on our interest rate hedging portfolio, including U.S. Treasury securities. Average pay-ups on our specified pools decreased to 0.70% as of December 31, 2016, from 0.73% as of December 31, 2015. Pay-ups are price premiums for specified pools relative to their TBA counterparts.
During 2016, in addition to interest rate swaps and other interest rate hedging instruments, we continued to use short positions in TBAs to hedge interest rate risk. In our hedging portfolio, the relative proportion (based on 10-year equivalents1) of short TBAs increased year over year as compared to interest rate swaps. Overall, we believe that there remains a heightened risk of substantial interest rate and mortgage prepayment volatility in the near term, thus reinforcing the importance of our ability to hedge our Agency RMBS portfolio using a variety of tools, including TBAs.
1"10-year equivalents" for a group of positions represent the amount of 10-year U.S. Treasury securities that would experience a similar change in market value under a standard parallel move in interest rates.

We actively traded our Agency RMBS portfolio during the year in order to capitalize both on sector rotation opportunities and trading opportunities. Our portfolio turnover for the year was 118% (as measured by sales and excluding paydowns), and we captured net realized gains of $8.1 million, excluding hedges.
During 2016, we continued to focus our Agency RMBS purchasing activity primarily on specified pools, especially those with higher coupons. As of December 31, 2016, the weighted average coupon on our fixed rate specified pools was 3.9%, as compared to 4.0% for December 31, 2015. Our Agency RMBS portfolio continues to include a small allocation to Agency IOs and we increased our holdings of those during the year. Some of the IOs that we purchased were backed by seasoned Ginnie Mae pools that have demonstrated some level of "burnout." Burnout often occurs after periods of high prepayments, when the mix of loans remaining in an RMBS pool becomes more concentrated in loans that tend to prepay more slowly; burnout can reflect a variety of factors, including the behavior of individual borrowers and overall trends in the mortgage banking industry. Our Agency IOs not only contribute to our portfolio in the form of their yields, but they also inherently serve as portfolio market value hedges in a rising interest rate environment.
We expect to continue to target specified pools that, taking into account their particular composition and based on our prepayment projections: (1) should generate attractive yields relative to other Agency RMBS and U.S. Treasury securities, (2) should have less prepayment sensitivity to government policy shocks, and/or (3) should create opportunities for trading gains once the market recognizes their value, which for newer pools may come only after several months, when actual prepayment experience can be observed. We believe that our research team, proprietary prepayment models, and extensive databases remain essential tools in our implementation of this strategy.
The following table summarizes prepayment rates for our portfolio of fixed rate specified pools (excluding those backed by reverse mortgages) for the three month periods ended December, 31, 2016, September 30, 2016, June 30, 2016, March 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015.
  Three Month Period Ended
  December 31, 2016 September 30, 2016 
June 30,
2016
 
March 31,
2016
 December 31, 2015
Three Month Constant Prepayment Rates(1)
 15.6% 14.1% 10.1% 7.1% 6.5%
(1)Excludes Agency fixed rate RMBS without any prepayment history.

The following table provides details about the composition of our portfolio of fixed rate specified pools (excluding those backed by reverse mortgages) as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
   December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
 Coupon Current Principal Fair Value Weighted
Average Loan
Age (Months)		 Current Principal Fair Value 
Weighted
Average Loan
Age (Months)
   (In thousands)   (In thousands)  
Fixed rate Agency RMBS:         
15-year fixed rate mortgages:             
 3.00
 $35,199
 $36,201
 20
 $49,894
 $51,566
 24
 3.50
 97,018
 101,868
 21
 102,118
 107,442
 13
 4.00
 9,612
 10,294
 30
 10,534
 11,253
 21
Total 15-year fixed rate mortgages  141,829
 148,363
 22
 162,546
 170,261
 17
20-year fixed rate mortgages4.00
 10,488
 11,185
 18
 18,477
 19,830
 13
30-year fixed rate mortgages:             
 2.50
 1,607
 1,562
 2
 —
 —
 —
 3.00
 16,000
 15,970
 29
 29,515
 29,571
 36
 3.50
 255,122
 263,743
 18
 137,826
 142,821
 22
 4.00
 391,677
 415,251
 17
 343,776
 365,952
 15
 4.50
 173,689
 188,083
 22
 266,547
 290,517
 14
 5.00
 48,324
 52,981
 35
 61,541
 68,208
 23
 5.50
 1,670
 1,854
 119
 2,261
 2,524
 107
 6.00
 887
 1,013
 123
 1,058
 1,201
 111
Total 30-year fixed rate mortgages  888,976
 940,457
 20
 842,524
 900,794
 18
Total fixed rate Agency RMBS  $1,041,293
 $1,100,005
 20
 $1,023,547
 $1,090,885
 18
Our net Agency premium as a percentage of our specified pool holdings is one metric that we use to measure our overall prepayment risk. Net Agency premium represents the total premium (excess of market value over outstanding principal balance) on specified pool holdings less the total premium on related net short TBA positions. The lower our net Agency premium, the less we believe that our specified pool portfolio is exposed to market-wide increases in Agency RMBS prepayments. As of December 31, 2016, our net Agency premium as a percentage of fair value on specified pool holdings was approximately 3.6% as compared to 4.1%, as of December 31, 2015. Excluding TBA positions used to hedge our long Agency RMBS portfolio, our Agency premium as a percentage of fair value was approximately 5.4% and 6.2% as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Our Agency premium percentage and net Agency premium percentage may fluctuate from period to period based on a variety of factors, including market factors such as interest rates and mortgage rates, and, in the case of our net Agency premium percentage, based on the degree to which we hedge prepayment risk with short TBAs. We believe that our focus on purchasing pools with specific prepayment characteristics provides a measure of protection against prepayments.
We believe that our adaptive and active style of portfolio management is well suited to the current MBS market environment, which continues to be shaped by heightened prepayment risk,shifting central bank policies, regulatory changes, and developing technologies.
Non-Agency
As of December 31, 2016, the value of our long non-Agency portfolio was $19.4 million, as compared to $31.4 million as of December 31, 2015.

Non-Agency RMBS performed well during the year. As the case has been for some time, the fundamentals underlying non-Agency RMBS, led by a stable housing market, continue to be strong. Our non-Agency portfolio benefited from strong yields, appreciation from our held positions, and net realized gains from positions sold. On a year-over-year basis, our non-Agency RMBS portfolio declined in size. To the extent that more attractive entry points develop in non-Agency RMBS, we may increase our capital allocation to this sector.
Financing
Over the course of the year our cost of repo financing increased as LIBOR increased. Our weighted average borrowing cost for the year ended December 31, 2016 was 0.71% as compared to 0.42% for the year ended December 31, 2015.
During the third quarter, notwithstanding the increase in short-term interest rates, Agency repo costs remained relatively constant. As a result of changes in money market fund regulations, there was a significant investor shift away from "prime" money market funds, which under the new regulations became susceptible to daily changes in their share prices, and into "government" money market funds. Because government money market funds are among the biggest providers of Agency RMBS repo, the increased assets of these funds resulted in an increase in the supply of Agency RMBS repo financing, and therefore put downward pressure on the cost of Agency RMBS repo, largely offsetting the increase in short-term interest rates in the third quarter. Despite the impact of the investor shift from prime money market funds to government money market funds, the surge in interest rates in the fourth quarter led to an increase in our cost of repo.
While large banks still dominate the repo market, non-bank firms, not subject to the same regulations as banks, are becoming more active in providing repo financing. The vast majority of our outstanding repo financing is still provided by banks and bank affiliates; however, in limited amounts, we have also entered into repo agreements with non-bank dealers. In general, we continue to see strong appetite and competitive terms from both types of lenders.
Our debt-to-equity ratio was to 8.5:1 as of December 31, 2016 as compared to 8.4:1 as of December 31, 2015. Adjusted for unsettled security purchases and sales, our debt-to-equity ratio was 8.3:1 as of December 31, 2016 and 8.1:1 as of December 31, 2015. Our leverage ratio may fluctuate period over period based on portfolio management decisions, market conditions, and the timing of security purchase and sale transactions.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP. Entities in which we have a controlling financial interest, through ownership of the majority of the entities' voting equity interests, or through other contractual right that give us control, are consolidated by us. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Certain of our critical accounting policies require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. We believe that all of the decisions and assessments upon which our consolidated financial statements are based were reasonable at the time made based upon information available to us at that time. We rely on our Manager and Ellington's experience and analysis of historical and current market data in order to arrive at what we believe to be reasonable estimates. See Note 2 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a complete discussion of our significant accounting policies. We have identified our most critical accounting policies to be the following:
Valuation: For financial instruments that are traded in an "active market," the best measure of fair value is the quoted market price. However, many of our financial instruments are not traded in an active market. Therefore, management generally uses third-party valuations when available. If third-party valuations are not available, management uses other valuation techniques, such as the discounted cash flow methodology. Summary descriptions, for the various categories of financial instruments, of the valuation methodologies management uses in determining fair value of our financial instruments are detailed in Note 2 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements. Management utilizes such methodologies to assign a good faith fair value (the estimated price that, in an orderly transaction at the valuation date, would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, as the case may be) to each such financial instrument.
See the notes to our consolidated financial statements for more information on valuation techniques used by management in the valuation of our assets and liabilities.
Accounting for Securities: Investments in mortgage-backed securities are recorded on trade date. We have chosen to make a fair value election pursuant to ASC 825-10, Financial Instruments, for our mortgage-backed securities portfolio. Electing the fair value option allows us to record changes in fair value in our Consolidated Statement of Operations, which, in our view, more appropriately reflects the results of our operations for a particular reporting period as all securities activities will be

recorded in a similar manner. As such, the mortgage-backed securities are recorded at fair value on our Consolidated Balance Sheet and the period change in fair value is recorded in current period earnings on our Consolidated Statement of Operations as a component of Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on securities.
Realized gains or losses on sales of mortgage-backed securities are included in Net realized gains (losses) on securities on the Consolidated Statement of Operations, and are recorded at the time of disposition. The cost of positions sold is calculated based on identified cost. Principal write-offs are generally treated as realized losses.
Interest Income: Coupon interest income on investment securities is accrued based on the outstanding principal balance and the current coupon rate on each security. We amortize purchase premiums and accrete purchase discounts on our fixed income investments using the effective interest method.
Our accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on securities for U.S. federal and other tax purposes is likely to differ from the accounting treatment under U.S. GAAP of these items as described above.
See the Note 2 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements for more information on the assumptions and methods that we use to amortize purchase premiums and accrete purchase discounts.
Income Taxes: We made an election to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a REIT, we generally are not subject to corporate-level federal and state income tax on net income we distribute to our shareholders. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of our taxable income to our shareholders. Even if we qualify as a REIT, we may be subject to certain federal, state, local and foreign taxes on our income and property and to federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed taxable income. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT, and does not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, it will be subject to U.S. federal, state, and local income taxes and may be precluded from qualifying as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which the Company fails to qualify as a REIT.
We follow the authoritative guidance on accounting for and disclosure of uncertainty on tax positions, which requires management to determine whether a tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. For uncertain tax positions, the tax benefit to be recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company did not have any unrecognized tax benefits resulting from tax positions related to the current period or to 2015, 2014, or 2013 (its open tax years). In the normal course of business, we may be subject to examination by federal, state, local, and foreign jurisdictions, where applicable, for the current period, 2015, 2014, and 2013 (our open tax years). We may take positions with respect to certain tax issues which depend on legal interpretation of facts or applicable tax regulations. Should the relevant tax regulators successfully challenge any such positions; we might be found to have a tax liability that has not been recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Also, management's conclusions regarding the authoritative guidance may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based on changing tax laws, regulations, and interpretations thereof. There were no amounts accrued for penalties or interest as of or during the periods presented in the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
"Emerging Growth Company" Status: On April 5, 2012, the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, or the "JOBS Act," was signed into law. The JOBS Act contains provisions that, among other things, reduce certain reporting requirements for qualifying public companies. Because we qualify as an "emerging growth company," we may, under Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act delay adoption of new or revised accounting standards applicable to public companies until such standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We may take advantage of this extended transition period until the first to occur of the date that we (i) are no longer an "emerging growth company" or (ii) affirmatively and irrevocably opt out of this extended transition period. We have elected to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period. As a result, our financial statements may not be comparable to those of other public companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards. Until the date that we are no longer an "emerging growth company" or affirmatively and irrevocably opt out of the exemption provided by Securities Act Section 7(a)(2)(B), upon issuance of a new or revised accounting standard that applies to our financial statements and that has a different effective date for public and private companies, we will disclose the date on which adoption is required for non-emerging growth companies and the date on which we will adopt the recently issued accounting standard.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Refer to the notes to our consolidated financial statements for a description of relevant recent accounting pronouncements.

Financial Condition
Investment portfolio
The following tables summarize our mortgage-backed securities portfolio of as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:
 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
(In thousands)Current Principal Fair Value 
Average Price(1)
 Cost 
Average Cost(1)
 Current Principal Fair Value 
Average Price(1)
 Cost 
Average Cost(1)
Agency RMBS(2)
                   
15-year fixed rate mortgages$141,829
 $148,363
 $104.61
 $148,873
 $104.97
 $162,546
 $170,261
 $104.75
 $170,385
 $104.82
20-year fixed rate mortgages10,488
 11,185
 106.65
 11,275
 107.50
 18,477
 19,830
 107.32
 19,754
 106.91
30-year fixed rate mortgages888,976
 940,457
 105.79
 948,157
 106.66
 842,524
 900,794
 106.92
 896,356
 106.39
ARMs31,656
 33,138
 104.68
 33,226
 104.96
 36,433
 38,530
 105.76
 38,629
 106.03
Reverse mortgages57,411
 62,058
 108.09
 63,114
 109.93
 68,690
 73,692
 107.28
 75,205
 109.48
Total Agency RMBS1,130,360
 1,195,201
 105.74
 1,204,645
 106.57
 1,128,670
 1,203,107
 106.60
 1,200,329
 106.35
Non-Agency RMBS27,794
 19,446
 69.96
 18,268
 65.73
 48,408
 31,401
 64.87
 30,395
 62.79
Total RMBS(2)
1,158,154
 1,214,647
 104.88
 1,222,913
 105.59
 1,177,078
 1,234,508
 104.88
 1,230,724
 104.56
Agency IOs n/a 12,347
 n/a 11,841
 n/a  n/a 7,758
 n/a 8,491
 n/a
Total mortgage-backed securities  1,226,994
   1,234,754
     1,242,266
   1,239,215
  
U.S. Treasury securities sold short(78,589) (74,194) 94.41
 (75,465) 96.02
 (79,550) (78,447) 98.61
 (79,003) 99.31
Reverse repurchase agreements75,012 75,012
 100.00
 75,012
 100.00
 78,632 78,632
 100.00
 78,632
 100.00
Total  $1,227,812
   $1,234,301
     $1,242,451
   $1,238,844
  
(1)Represents the dollar amount (not shown in thousands) per $100 of current principal of the price or cost for the security.
(2)Excludes Agency IOs.
The vast majority of our capital is allocated to our Agency RMBS strategy, which includes investments in Agency pools and Agency CMOs. Within this strategy, we generally target Agency RMBS pools that, taking into account their particular composition and based on our prepayment projections: (1) should generate attractive yields relative to other Agency RMBS and U.S. Treasury securities, (2) should have less prepayment sensitivity to government policy shocks and/or (3) should create opportunities for trading gains once the market recognizes their value, which for newer pools may come only after several months when actual prepayment experience can be observed. As of both December 31, 2016 and 2015, investments in non-Agency RMBS constituted a relatively small portion of our total investments.
Our most prevalent method of financing RMBS is through short-term repurchase agreements, which generally have maturities of 180 days or less. The weighted average lives of the RMBS that we own are generally much longer. Consequently, the weighted average term of our repurchase agreement financings will almost always be substantially shorter than the expected average maturity of our RMBS. This mismatch in maturities, together with the uncertainty of RMBS prepayments, and other potential changes in timing and/or amount of cash flows on our RMBS assets, creates the risk that changes in interest rates will cause our financing costs with respect to our RMBS to increase relative to the income on our RMBS over the term of our investments.

Financial Derivatives
The following table summarizes our portfolio of financial derivative holdings as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:
(In thousands) December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
Financial derivatives–assets, at fair value:    
TBA securities purchase contracts $96
 $115
TBA securities sale contracts 949
 302
Fixed payer interest rate swaps 4,198
 891
Fixed receiver interest rate swaps 693
 857
Futures 72
 18
Total financial derivatives–assets, at fair value 6,008
 2,183
Financial derivatives–liabilities, at fair value:    
TBA securities purchase contracts —
 (49)
TBA securities sale contracts (554) (315)
Fixed payer interest rate swaps (1,421) (4,361)
Total financial derivatives–liabilities, at fair value (1,975) (4,725)
Total $4,033
 $(2,542)
Pursuant to our hedging program, we engage in a variety of interest rate hedging activities that are designed to reduce the interest rate risk with respect to the liabilities incurred to acquire or hold RMBS. These interest rate hedges generally seek to reduce the interest rate sensitivity of our liabilities or, in other words, reduce the volatility of our financing cost over time attributable to interest rate changes. Our interest rate hedging transactions may include:
•Interest rate swaps (a contract exchanging a variable rate for a fixed rate, or vice versa);
•Interest rate swaptions (options to enter into interest rate swaps at a future date);
•TBA forward contracts on Agency pass-through certificates;
•Short sales of U.S. Treasury securities;
•Eurodollar and U.S. Treasury futures; and
•Other derivatives.
We generally enter into these transactions to offset the potential adverse effects of rising interest rates on short-term repurchase agreements. Our repurchase agreements generally have maturities of up to 180 days and carry interest rates that are determined by reference to LIBOR or correlated benchmark rates for those same periods. As each then-existing fixed rate repo borrowing matures, it will generally be replaced with a new fixed rate repo borrowing based on market interest rates established at that future date.
In the case of interest rate swaps, most of our agreements are structured such that we receive payments based on a variable interest rate and make payments based on a fixed interest rate. The variable interest rate on which payments are received is generally calculated based on various reset mechanisms for LIBOR. To the extent that our future repo borrowing costs continue to be highly correlated with LIBOR, our swap agreements help to reduce the variability of our overall repo borrowing costs, thus reducing risk to the extent we hold fixed rate assets that are financed with repo borrowings.
In the case of TBAs, most of our positions are short TBA positions with a negative duration, meaning that as interest rates rise, the value of the short position increases, so these positions serve as a hedge against increases in interest rates. In the event that interest rates rise, the increase in value of the short TBA position serves to offset corollary increases in our current and/or future borrowing costs under our repurchase agreements. While we primarily use TBAs to hedge interest rate risk, from time to time we also hold net long positions in certain TBA securities as a means of acquiring exposure to Agency RMBS. Our ability to engage in TBA transactions may be limited by our intention to remain qualified as a REIT.
As of December 31, 2016, as part of our interest rate hedging program, we also held short positions in U.S. Treasury securities, with a total principal amount of $78.6 million and a fair value of $74.2 million. As of December 31, 2015, we also held short positions in U.S. Treasury securities, with a total principal amount of $79.6 million and a fair value of $78.4 million.

The composition and relative mix of instruments we use to hedge various risks may vary from period to period given the amount of our liabilities outstanding or anticipated to be entered into, the overall market environment and our view as to which instruments best enable us to execute our hedging goals.
Leverage
The following table summarizes our outstanding liabilities under repurchase agreements as of December 31, 2016 and 2015. We had no other borrowings outstanding.
  December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
    Weighted Average   Weighted Average
Remaining Days to Maturity Borrowings Outstanding Interest Rate Remaining Days to Maturity Borrowings Outstanding Interest Rate Remaining Days to Maturity
  (In thousands)          
30 days or less $545,817
 0.80% 19 $666,124
 0.52% 14
31-60 days 304,398
 0.91
 45 336,350
 0.53
 45
61-90 days 299,081
 0.98
 74 89,142
 0.70
 74
91-120 days 1,050
 0.88
 109 131,103
 0.53
 106
121-150 days 12,428
 0.97
 135 —
 —
 —
151-180 days 35,199
 1.05
 164 —
 —
 —
Total $1,197,973
 0.88% 45 $1,222,719
 0.54% 37
We finance our assets with what we believe to be a prudent amount of leverage, which will vary from time to time based upon the particular characteristics of our portfolio, availability of financing, and market conditions. Because our strategy is flexible, dynamic, and opportunistic, our overall leverage will vary over time. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, our total debt-to-equity ratio was 8.5 to 1 and 8.4 to 1, respectively. Collateral transferred with respect to our outstanding repo borrowings as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 had an aggregate fair value of $1.2 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively. Adjusted for unsettled security purchases and sales, our debt-to-equity ratio was 8.3 to 1 and 8.1 to 1 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Our leverage ratio may fluctuate period over period based on portfolio management decisions, market conditions, and the timing of security purchase and sale transactions.
Shareholders' Equity
As of December 31, 2016, our shareholders' equity decreased to $141.7 million from $144.9 million as of December 31, 2015. This decrease principally consisted of dividends declared of $15.1 million and the repurchase of common shares of $0.2 million, partially offset by net income of $11.9 million and share based compensation of $0.2 million. As of December 31, 2016, our book value per share was $15.52 as compared to $15.86 as of December 31, 2015.

Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014:
The following table summarizes our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014:
(In thousands except for per share amounts) Year Ended
December 31, 2016		 Year Ended
December 31, 2015		 Year Ended
December 31, 2014
Net Interest Income      
Net interest income $24,224
 $34,515
 $42,313
Expenses      
Management fees 2,129
 2,304
 2,285
Other operating expenses 2,880
 2,841
 3,467
Total expenses 5,009
 5,145
 5,752
Other Income (Loss)      
Net realized and change in net unrealized gains (losses) on securities (1,676) (9,327) 51,007
Net realized and change in net unrealized gains (losses) on financial derivatives (5,633) (20,013) (71,400)
Total Other Income (Loss) (7,309) (29,340) (20,393)
Net Income $11,906
 $30
 $16,168
Net Income Per Common Share $1.31
 $—
 $1.77
Core Earnings
Core Earnings consists of net income (loss), excluding realized and change in net unrealized gains and (losses) on securities and financial derivatives, and, if applicable, items of income or loss that are of a non-recurring nature. Core Earnings includes net realized and change in net unrealized gains (losses) associated with payments and accruals of periodic payments on interest rate swaps. Our interest income is subject to fluctuations based on adjustments to premium amortization as a result of changes in prepayments of our Agency RMBS (accompanied by a corresponding offsetting adjustment to realized and unrealized gains and losses). We refer to this adjustment as a "Catch-up Premium Amortization Adjustment." Core Earnings excluding Catch-up Premium Amortization Adjustment consists of Core Earnings but excludes the effect of the Catch-up Premium Amortization Adjustment on interest income. Core Earnings and Core Earnings excluding Catch-up Premium Amortization Adjustment are supplemental non-GAAP financial measures. We believe that Core Earnings and Core Earnings excluding Catch-up Premium Amortization Adjustment provide information useful to investors because they are metrics that we use to assess our performance and to evaluate the effective net yield provided by the portfolio. Moreover, one of our objectives is to generate income from the net interest margin on the portfolio, and Core Earnings and Core Earnings excluding Catch-up Premium Amortization Adjustment are used to help measure the extent to which this objective is being achieved. However, because Core Earnings and Core Earnings excluding Catch-up Premium Amortization Adjustment are incomplete measures of our financial results and differ from net income (loss) computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP, they should be considered as supplementary to, and not as substitutes for, net income (loss) computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

The table below reconciles Core Earnings and Core Earnings excluding Catch-up Premium Amortization Adjustment for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 to the line, Net Income, on our Consolidated Statement of Operations, which we believe is the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure:
(In thousands except for share amounts) Year Ended
December 31, 2016		 Year Ended
December 31, 2015		 Year Ended
December 31, 2014
Net Income $11,906
 $30
 $16,168
Less:      
Net realized gains (losses) on securities 8,420
 9,577
 2,457
Net realized losses on financial derivatives, excluding periodic payments(1)
 (7,782) (16,405) (22,661)
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on securities (10,096) (18,904) 48,550
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on financial derivatives, excluding accrued periodic payments(2)
 5,724
 3,769
 (39,932)
Subtotal (3,734) (21,963) (11,586)
Core Earnings $15,640
 $21,993
 $27,754
Catch-up Premium Amortization Adjustment (2,051) (1,076) 595
Core Earnings excluding Catch-up Premium Amortization Adjustment 17,691
 23,069
 27,159
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding 9,121,344
 9,143,508
 9,142,736
Core Earnings Per Share $1.71
 $2.41
 $3.04
Core Earnings Per Share excluding Catch-up Premium Amortization Adjustment $1.94
 $2.52
 $2.97
(1)
For the year ended December 31, 2016, represents Net realized gains (losses) on financial derivatives of $(12,120) less Net realized gains (losses) on periodic settlements of interest rate swaps of $(4,338). For the year ended December 31, 2015, represents Net realized gains (losses) on financial derivatives of $(23,432) less Net realized gains (losses) on periodic settlements of interest rate swaps of $(7,027). For the year ended December 31, 2014, represents Net realized gains (losses) on financial derivatives of $(31,878) less Net realized gains (losses) on periodic settlements of interest rate swaps of $(9,217).
(2)
For the year ended December 31, 2016, represents Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on financial derivatives of $6,487 less Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on accrued periodic settlements of interest rate swaps of $763. For the year ended December 31, 2015, represents Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on financial derivatives of $3,419 less Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on accrued periodic settlements of interest rate swaps of $(350). For the year ended December 31, 2014, represents Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on financial derivatives of $(39,522) less Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on accrued periodic settlements of interest rate swaps of $410.
Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
Net Income
The increase in net income for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 was principally due to a decrease in net realized and unrealized losses on securities and financial derivatives for the year ended December 31, 2016. Each year included periods of high volatility in interest rates which led to significant swings in net realized and unrealized gains and losses on our securities and financial derivatives. Our year-over-year net interest income declined as a result of a decline in the size of our average portfolio holdings, as well as an increase in our cost of repo. Reduced net interest income resulted in a commensurate decline in our Core Earnings.
Interest Income
Our portfolio as of both December 31, 2016 and 2015 consisted primarily of Agency RMBS, and to a lesser extent, non-Agency RMBS. Before interest expense, we earned approximately $33.2 million and $40.7 million in interest income on these securities for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The year-over-year decrease in interest income resulted from lower average holdings and lower average yields on both our Agency and non-Agency RMBS.

The following table details our interest income, average holdings of interest-earning assets, and weighted average yield based on amortized cost for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
 
Non-Agency(1)
 
Agency(1)
 
Total(1)
(In thousands)Interest Income Average Holdings Yield Interest Income Average Holdings Yield Interest Income Average Holdings Yield
Year ended December 31, 2016$2,188
 $22,792
 9.60% $31,001
 $1,201,860
 2.58% $33,189
 $1,224,652
 2.71%
Year ended December 31, 2015$3,158
 $28,808
 10.96% $37,546
 $1,293,950
 2.90% $40,704
 $1,322,758
 3.08%
(1)Amounts exclude interest income on cash and cash equivalents (including when posted as margin) and long U.S. Treasury securities.
Interest Expense
For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the majority of interest expense that we incurred was related to our repo borrowings, which we use to finance our assets. We also incur interest expense in connection with our short positions in U.S. Treasury securities. Our total interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $9.3 million, of which $8.1 million represented interest expense on our repo borrowings and approximately $1.2 million represented interest expense related primarily to our short positions in U.S. Treasury securities. Our total interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $6.2 million, of which $5.2 million represented interest expense on our repo borrowings and approximately $1.0 million represented interest expense related primarily to our short positions in U.S. Treasury securities. The year-over-year increase in our total interest expense resulted mainly from higher rates on our repo borrowings. In December 2015, for the first time in several years, the Federal Reserve increased the target range for the federal funds rate, to a range of 0.25%-to-0.50%, up 25 basis points from the prior range of 0.0%-to-0.25%; this increase has caused repo borrowing rates to increase. Our average outstanding repo borrowings for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $1.15 billion, resulting in an average cost of funds of 0.71%. Our average outstanding repo borrowings for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $1.24 billion, resulting in an average cost of funds of 0.42%.
The following table shows information related to our average cost of funds for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
($ in thousands) Average Borrowed Funds Interest Expense Average Cost of Funds Average One-Month LIBOR Average Six-Month LIBOR
Year Ended December 31, 2016 $1,145,850
 $8,148
 0.71% 0.50% 1.06%
Year Ended December 31, 2015 $1,239,580
 $5,208
 0.42% 0.20% 0.49%
As an alternative cost of funds measure, we add to our repo interest cost the net periodic amounts paid or payable by us on our interest rate swaps and the interest expense we incur on our short positions in U.S. Treasury securities, and express the total as a percentage of our average outstanding borrowings. The total of our net periodic expense paid or payable under our interest rate swaps and our interest expense on our short positions in U.S. Treasury securities was $4.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, or 0.40% of our average outstanding repo borrowings, thereby resulting in an average cost of funds including interest rate swaps and short positions in U.S. Treasury securities of 1.11%. The total of our net periodic expense paid or payable under our interest rate swaps was $8.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, or 0.68% of our average outstanding borrowings, thereby resulting in an average cost of funds including interest rate swaps of 1.10%. This metric does not take into account other instruments that we use to hedge interest rate risk, such as TBAs, swaptions, and futures.
Management Fees
For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, our management fee expense was approximately $2.1 million and $2.3 million, respectively. The decrease in management fees year over year was due to our smaller capital base.
Other Operating Expenses
Other operating expenses, as presented above, include professional fees, compensation expense, and various other expenses incurred in connection with the operation of our business. Other operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were approximately $2.9 million and $2.8 million, respectively. Our expense ratio, which represents our management fees and other operating expenses as a percentage of our average shareholders' equity, was 3.5% for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to 3.3% for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in our expense ratio was

primarily due to a decrease in our average shareholders' equity for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.
Other Income (Loss)
Other income (loss) consists of net realized and net change in unrealized gain (losses) on securities and financial derivatives. For the year ended December 31, 2016, other loss was $(7.3) million, and consisted of net realized and change in net unrealized losses of $(5.6) million on our financial derivatives and approximately $(1.7) million on our securities, primarily our Agency RMBS. The year ended December 31, 2016 included periods of significant interest rate volatility. Interest rates declined over the first half of the year, but increased significantly towards the end of the year. Generally, our assets produced net gains as interest rates declined in the first half of the year, and net losses when interest rates fell in the latter half of the year. Conversely our interest rate hedges produced losses in the first half of the year, but gains in the latter half of the year. For the year ended December 31, 2016, as measured by sales and excluding paydowns, we turned over approximately 118% of our Agency RMBS portfolio and, as a result, we generated net realized gains of $8.1 million on our Agency RMBS portfolio. Even though long-term interest rates ended the year only moderately higher than where they began, volatility throughout the year led to "delta-hedging" losses, as we actively adjusted our portfolio following significant interest rate movements. To the extent that our hedging portfolio is more heavily concentrated in interest rate swaps, futures, and/or U.S. Treasury securities, as opposed to swaptions and/or short positions in TBAs, our delta-hedging losses can be significant in volatile markets, and can lead to volatility in our results.
Other income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $(29.3) million and consisted of net realized and change in net unrealized losses of $(20.0) million on our financial derivatives and net realized and change in net unrealized losses of approximately $(9.3) million on our securities, primarily our Agency RMBS. The year ended December 31, 2015 was marked by significant interest rate volatility, and our hedging portfolio was generally more heavily concentrated in interest rate swaps during 2015 as compared to 2016, which led to greater delta-hedging losses in 2015 as compared to 2016.
Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
Net Income (Loss)
The decrease in net income year over year was principally due to a decrease in net interest income, as discussed below, and net realized and unrealized losses on securities for the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to net realized and unrealized gains on securities for the year ended December 31, 2014. Reduced net interest income resulted in a commensurate decline in our Core Earnings.
Interest Income
Our portfolio as of both December 31, 2015 and 2014 consisted primarily of Agency RMBS, and to a lesser extent, non-Agency RMBS. Before interest expense, we earned approximately $40.7 million and $46.8 million in interest income on these securities for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The year-over-year decrease in interest income resulted from lower yields on our Agency RMBS and lower average holdings on both our Agency and non-Agency RMBS.
The following table details our interest income, average holdings of interest-earning assets, and weighted average yield based on amortized cost for the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014:
 
Non-Agency(1)
 
Agency(1)
 
Total(1)
(In thousands)Interest Income Average Holdings Yield Interest Income Average Holdings Yield Interest Income Average Holdings Yield
Year ended
December 31, 2015		$3,158
 $28,808
 10.96% $37,546
 $1,293,950
 2.90% $40,704
 $1,322,758
 3.08%
Year ended
December 31, 2014		$3,167
 $29,851
 10.61% $43,643
 $1,333,054
 3.27% $46,810
 $1,362,905
 3.43%
(1)Amounts exclude interest income on cash and cash equivalents (including when posted as margin) and long U.S. Treasury securities.
Interest Expense
For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the majority of interest expense that we incurred was related to our repo borrowings, which we use to finance our assets. We also incur interest expense in connection with our short positions in U.S. Treasury securities. Our total interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $6.2 million, of which $5.2 million represented interest expense on our repo borrowings and approximately $1.0 million represented interest expense related primarily to our short positions in U.S. Treasury securities. Our total interest expense for the year ended December 31,

2014 was $4.5 million, substantially all of which represented interest expense on our repo borrowings. The year-over-year increase in our total interest expense was mainly due to an increase in interest expense paid on short U.S. Treasury securities associated with an increase in the use of these instruments for hedging purposes and also to a lesser extent an increase in our cost of funds due to higher financing rates. Our average outstanding repo borrowings for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $1.24 billion, resulting in an average cost of funds of 0.42%. Our average outstanding repo borrowings for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $1.26 billion, resulting in an average cost of funds of 0.35%.
The following table shows information related to our average cost of funds for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.
($ in thousands) Average Borrowed Funds Interest Expense Average Cost of Funds Average One-Month LIBOR Average Six-Month LIBOR
Year Ended December 31, 2015 $1,239,580
 $5,208
 0.42% 0.20% 0.49%
Year Ended December 31, 2014 $1,256,771
 $4,385
 0.35% 0.16% 0.33%
As an alternative cost of funds measure, we add to our repo interest cost the net periodic amounts paid or payable by us on our interest rate swaps and the interest expense we incur on our short positions in U.S. Treasury securities, and express the total as a percentage of our average outstanding borrowings. The total of our net periodic expense paid or payable under our interest rate swaps and our interest expense on our short positions in U.S. Treasury securities was $8.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, or 0.68% of our average outstanding repo borrowings, thereby resulting in an average cost of funds including interest rate swaps and short positions in U.S. Treasury securities of 1.10%. The total of our net periodic expense paid or payable under our interest rate swaps was $8.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, or 0.70% of our average outstanding borrowings, thereby resulting in an average cost of funds including interest rate swaps of 1.05%. This metric does not take into account other instruments that we use to hedge interest rate risk, such as TBAs, swaptions, and futures.
Management Fees
For both of the years ended December 31, 20152023 and 2014, our management fee expense was approximately $2.3 million.
Other Operating Expenses
Other operating expenses include professional fees, compensation expense, and various other expenses incurred in connection with the operation of our business. Other operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 20142022 were approximately $2.8 million and $3.5 million, respectively. Our expense ratio, which represents our management fees and other operating expenses as a percentage of our average shareholders' equity, was 3.3% for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to 3.4% for the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease in our expense ratio is primarily due to a decrease in professional fees and compensation expense.
Other Income (Loss)
Other income (loss) consisted of net realized and net change in unrealized gain (losses) on securities and financial derivatives. For the year ended December 31, 2015, other income (loss) was $(29.3) million, and consisted of net realized and change in net unrealized losses of $(20.0) million on our financial derivatives and by net realized and change in net unrealized losses of approximately $(9.3) million on our securities, primarily our Agency RMBS. The year ended December 31, 2015 was marked by significant interest rate volatility. Over the course of 2015, interest rates have moved both sharply higher and sharply lower, and overall, have resulted in net losses on our financial derivatives, most notably our interest rate swaps. Since, over the course of the year ended December 31, 2015, we have been using a greater amount of interest rate swaps relative to short TBAs to hedge interest rate risk, we have had to much more actively adjust our interest rate hedges as interest rates have moved sharply higher and lower. This increased interest rate swap adjustment activity, coupled with the significant overall decline in swap spreads, led to losses on our interest rate swaps over the period. Over the course of the year, we actively traded our Agency RMBS portfolio. Our portfolio turnover was approximately 112% (as measured by sales and excluding paydowns), and we captured net realized gains of $9.0 million, excluding hedges.
Other income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $(20.4) million and consisted of net realized and change in net unrealized losses of $(71.4) million on our financial derivatives, partially offset by net realized and change in net unrealized gains of approximately $51.0 million on our securities, principally our Agency RMBS.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity refers to our ability to meet our cash needs, including repaying our borrowings, funding and maintaining RMBS and other assets, paying dividends, and other general business needs. Our short-term (one year or less) and long-term liquidity requirements include acquisition costs for assets we acquire, payment of our management fee, compliance with margin requirements under our repurchase agreements, TBA and other financial derivative contracts, repayment of repurchase agreement borrowings to the extent we are unable or unwilling to extend our repurchase agreements, the payment of dividends, and payment of our general operating expenses. Our capital resources primarily include cash on hand, cash flow from our investments (including monthly principal and interest payments received on our RMBS and proceeds from the sale of RMBS), borrowings under repurchase agreements, and proceeds from equity offerings. We expect that these sources of funds will be sufficient to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity needs.
We borrow funds in the form of repurchase agreements. The terms of these borrowings under our Master Repurchase Agreements, or "MRAs," generally conform to the terms in the standard master repurchase agreement as published by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association as to repayment and margin requirements. In addition, each lender may require that we include supplemental terms and conditions to the standard master repurchase agreement. Typical supplemental terms and conditions include the addition of or changes to provisions relating to margin calls, net asset value requirements, cross default provisions, certain key person events, changes in corporate structure, and requirements that all controversies related to the repurchase agreement be litigated in a particular jurisdiction. These provisions may differ for each of our lenders.
As of each of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had $1.2 billion outstanding under our repurchase agreements. As of December 31, 2016, our outstanding repurchase agreements were with thirteen counterparties.
Amount at risk represents the excess, if any, for each counterparty of the fair value of collateral held by such counterparty over the amounts outstanding under repurchase agreements. The following table reflects counterparties for which the amounts at risk relating to our repurchase agreements was greater than 5% of shareholders' equity as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.
December 31, 2016:
Counterparty 
Amount at Risk(1)
 Weighted Average Remaining Days to Maturity Percentage of Shareholders' Equity
  (In thousands)    
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. $15,077
 58 10.6%
Deutsche Bank Securities $11,778
 36 8.3%
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. $11,533
 38 8.1%
RBC Capital Markets LLC $11,506
 34 8.1%
(1)Amounts at risk exclude, in aggregate, $1.6 million of net accrued interest, defined as accrued interest on securities held as collateral less interest payable on cash borrowed.
December 31, 2015:
Counterparty 
Amount at Risk(1)
 Weighted Average Remaining Days to Maturity Percentage of Shareholders' Equity
  (In thousands)    
Deutsche Bank Securities $12,950
 24 8.9%
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. $12,377
 29 8.5%
RBC Capital Markets LLC $9,630
 64 6.6%
(1)Amounts at risk exclude, in aggregate, $1.5 million of net accrued interest, defined as accrued interest on securities held as collateral less interest payable on cash borrowed.
The amounts borrowed under our repurchase agreements are generally subject to the application of "haircuts." A haircut is the percentage discount that a repo lender applies to the market value of an asset serving as collateral for a repo borrowing, for the purpose of determining whether such repo borrowing is adequately collateralized. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the weighted average contractual haircut applicable to the assets that serve as collateral for our outstanding repo borrowings was 4.8% and 4.7%, respectively.

The following table details total outstanding borrowings, average outstanding borrowings, and the maximum outstanding borrowings at any month end for each quarter under repurchase agreements for the past twelve quarters.
Quarter Ended 
Borrowings
Outstanding at
Quarter End
 
Average
Borrowings Outstanding
 Maximum Borrowings Outstanding at Any Month End
  (In thousands)
December 31, 2016 $1,197,973
 $1,170,091
 $1,197,973
September 30, 2016 1,158,962
 1,138,439
 1,158,962
June 30, 2016 1,205,987
 1,132,184
 1,205,987
March 31, 2016 1,133,841
 1,142,501
 1,175,531
December 31, 2015 1,222,719
 1,228,964
 1,286,274
September 30, 2015 1,225,905
 1,242,650
 1,248,604
June 30, 2015 1,264,479
 1,247,617
 1,269,551
March 31, 2015 1,211,110
 1,239,167
 1,255,568
December 31, 2014 1,323,080
 1,275,874
 1,323,080
September 30, 2014 1,233,333
 1,251,296
 1,275,122
June 30, 2014 1,285,593
 1,239,899
 1,285,593
March 31, 2014 1,281,470
 1,259,901
 1,281,470
We held cash and cash equivalents of approximately $33.5 million and $40.2 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
We may declare dividends based on, among other things, our earnings, our financial condition, the REIT qualification requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, our working capital needs and new opportunities. The declaration of dividends to our shareholders and the amount of such dividends are at the discretion of our Board of Trustees. The following table sets forth the dividend distributions authorized by the Board of Trustees for the periods indicated below:
Year Ended December 31, 2016
 
Dividend
Per Share
 Dividend Amount Declaration Date Record Date Payment Date
   (In thousands)      
First Quarter$0.45
 $4,103
 March 8, 2016 March 31, 2016 April 25, 2016
Second Quarter$0.40
 $3,647
 June 14, 2016 June 30, 2016 July 27, 2016
Third Quarter$0.40
 $3,651
 September 13, 2016 September 30, 2016 October 25, 2016
Fourth Quarter$0.40
 $3,652
 December 13, 2016 December 30, 2016 January 25, 2017
Year Ended December 31, 2015
 
Dividend
Per Share
 Dividend Amount Declaration Date Record Date Payment Date
   (In thousands)      
First Quarter$0.55
 $5,032
 March 11, 2015 March 31, 2015 April 27, 2015
Second Quarter$0.55
 $5,032
 June 16, 2015 June 30, 2015 July 27, 2015
Third Quarter$0.45
 $4,111
 September 15, 2015 September 30, 2015 October 26, 2015
Fourth Quarter$0.45
 $4,111
 December 15, 2015 December 31, 2015 January 25, 2016
For the year ended December 31, 2016, our operating activities provided net cash of $19.9 million and our investing activities provided net cash of $13.9 million. Our repo activity used to finance our purchase of securities (including repayments, in conjunction with the sales of securities, of amounts borrowed under our repurchase agreements) used net cash of $24.7 million. Thus our operating and investing activities, when combined with our net repo financing activities, provided net cash of $9.0 million. We used $15.5 million to pay dividends and $0.2 million for the repurchase of common shares. As a result of these activities, there was a decrease in our cash holdings of $6.7 million from $40.2 million as of December 31, 2015 to $33.5 million as of December 31, 2016.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, our operating activities provided net cash of $24.8 million and our investing activities provided net cash of $90.1 million. Our repo activity used to finance our purchase of securities (including repayments, in conjunction with the sales of securities, of amounts borrowed under our repurchase agreements) used net cash of $100.4 million. Thus our operating and investing activities, when combined with our net repo financing activities, provided net cash of $14.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. We used $19.2 million to pay dividends and $0.4 million for the repurchase of common shares. As a result of these activities, there was a decrease in our cash holdings of $5.1 million from $45.2 million as of December 31, 2014 to $40.2 million as of December 31, 2015.
For the year ended December 31, 2014, our operating activities provided net cash of $21.3 million and our investing activities used net cash of $19.0 million. Our repo activity used to finance our purchase of securities (including repayments, in conjunction with the sales of securities, of amounts borrowed under our repurchase agreements) provided net cash of $12.7 million. Thus our operating and investing activities, when combined with our net repo financing activities, provided net cash of $15.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. We used $19.7 million to pay dividends and $0.2 million to pay offering costs. As a result of these activities, there was a decrease in our cash holdings of $4.9 million from $50.1 million as of December 31, 2013 to $45.2 million as of December 31, 2014.
On August 13, 2013, our Board of Trustees approved the adoption of a $10 million share repurchase program. The program, which is open-ended in duration, allows us to make repurchases from time to time on the open market or in negotiated transactions. Repurchases are at our discretion, subject to applicable law, share availability, price and our financial performance, among other considerations. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we purchased 17,920 common shares at an average price per share of $10.94 for an aggregate cost of approximately $0.2$1.8 million.
Based on our current portfolio, amount of free cash on hand, debt-to-equity ratio and current and anticipated availability of credit, we believe that our capital resources will be sufficient to enable us to meet anticipated short-term and long-term liquidity requirements.
We are not required by our investment guidelines to maintain any specific debt-to-equity ratio, and we believe that the appropriate leverage for the particular assets we hold depends on the credit quality and risk of those assets, as well as the general availability and terms of stable and reliable financing for those assets.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
We are a party to a management agreement with our Manager. Pursuant to that agreement, our Manager is entitled to receive a management fee based on shareholders' equity, reimbursement of certain expenses and, in certain circumstances, a termination fee. Such fees and expenses do not have fixed and determinable payments. For a description of the management agreement provisions, see Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements.
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 2016:
(In thousands) Less than One Year 1-3 Years 3-5 Years 
More than
Five Years
 Total
Repurchase agreements 1,197,973
 —
 —
 —
 1,197,973
Interest expense on repurchase agreements, based on rates at December 31, 2016(1)
 2,989
 —
 —
 —
 2,989
Payable for securities purchased 5,516
 —
 —
 —
 5,516
Total 1,206,478
 —
 —
 —
 1,206,478
(1)Includes accrued interest expense on repurchase agreements at December 31, 2016 of $1.6 million which is included in Interest payable on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
We enter into repurchase agreements with third-party broker-dealers whereby we sell securities to such broker-dealers at agreed-upon purchase prices at the initiation of the repurchase agreements and agree to repurchase such securities at predetermined repurchase prices and termination dates, thus providing the broker-dealers with an implied interest rate on the funds initially transferred to us by the broker-dealers. We may enter into reverse repurchase agreements with third-party broker-dealers whereby we purchase securities under agreements to resell at an agreed-upon price and date. In general, we most often will enter into reverse repurchase agreement transactions in order to effectively borrow securities that we can then deliver to counterparties to whom we have made short sales of the same securities. The implied interest rates on the repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements we enter into are based upon competitive market rates at the time of initiation. Repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements that are conducted with the same counterparty may be reported on a net basis if they meet the requirements of ASC 210-20, Balance Sheet, Offsetting. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, there

were no repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements reported on a net basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
As of December 31, 2016 we had $1.2 billion of outstanding borrowings with thirteen counterparties.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2016, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Further, we have not guaranteed any obligations of unconsolidated entities nor do we have any commitment or intent to provide funding to any such entities. As such, we are not materially exposed to any market, credit, liquidity, or financing risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.
Inflation
Virtually all of our assets and liabilities are interest rate-sensitive in nature. As a result, interest rates and other factors influence our performance far more so than does inflation. Changes in interest rates do not necessarily correlate with inflation rates or changes in inflation rates. Our activities and balance sheet are measured with reference to historical cost and/or fair market value without considering inflation.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The primary components of our market risk are related to interest rate risk, prepayment risk, and credit risk. We seek to actively manage these and other risks and to acquire and hold assets that we believe justify bearing those risks, and to maintain capital levels consistent with those risks.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations, and other factors beyond our control. We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with most of our assets and liabilities. For some securities in our portfolio, the coupon interest rates on, and therefore also the values of, such securities are highly sensitive to interest rate movements, such as inverse floating rate RMBS, which benefit from falling interest rates. Our repurchase agreements generally have maturities of up to 180 days and carry interest rates that are determined by reference to LIBOR or similar short-term benchmark rates for those same periods. Whenever one of our fixed rate repo borrowings matures, it will generally be replaced with a new fixed rate repo borrowing based on market interest rates prevailing at such time. Subject to qualifying and maintaining our qualification as a REIT and our exclusion from registration under the Investment Company Act, we opportunistically hedge our interest rate risk by entering into interest rate swaps, TBAs, U.S. Treasury securities, Eurodollar and U.S. Treasury futures, and other instruments. In general, such hedging instruments are used to offset the large majority of the interest rate risk we estimate to arise from our repurchase agreement indebtedness generally associated with our Agency RMBS positions. Hedging instruments may also be used to offset a portion of the interest rate risk arising from our repurchase agreement liabilities associated with non-Agency RMBS positions, if any.

In addition to measuring and mitigating the risk related to changes in interest rates with respect to the generally shorter-term liabilities we incur to acquire and hold generally longer-lived RMBS, we also monitor the effect of changes in interest rates on the discounted present value of our portfolio of assets and liabilities. The following sensitivity analysis table shows the estimated impact on the fair value of our portfolio segregated by certain identified categories as of December 31, 2016, assuming a static portfolio and immediate and parallel shifts in interest rates from current levels as indicated below.
(In thousands) Estimated Change for a Decrease in Interest Rates by Estimated Change for an Increase in Interest Rates by
  50 Basis Points 100 Basis Points 50 Basis Points 100 Basis Points
Category of Instruments Market Value % of Total Equity Market Value % of Total Equity Market Value % of Total Equity Market Value % of Total Equity
Agency RMBS, excluding TBAs $19,135
 13.51 % $32,501
 22.94 % $(24,903) (17.58)% $(55,573) (39.23)%
TBAs (7,077) (5.00)% (11,407) (8.05)% 9,823
 6.93 % 22,392
 15.81 %
Non-Agency RMBS 197
 0.14 % 399
 0.28 % (192) (0.13)% (380) (0.27)%
U.S. Treasury Securities, Interest Rate Swaps, and Futures (12,665) (8.94)% (25,895) (18.28)% 12,100
 8.54 % 23,636
 16.68 %
Repurchase and Reverse Repurchase Agreements (739) (0.52)% (1,374) (0.97)% 736
 0.52 % 1,472
 1.04 %
Total $(1,149) (0.81)% $(5,776) (4.08)% $(2,436) (1.72)% $(8,453) (5.97)%
Our analysis of interest rate risk is derived from Ellington's proprietary models as well as third-party information and analytics. Many assumptions have been made in connection with the calculations set forth in the table above and, as such, there can be no assurance that assumed events will occur or that other events will not occur that would affect the outcomes. For example, for each hypothetical immediate shift in interest rates, assumptions have been made as to the response of mortgage prepayment rates, the shape of the yield curve, and market volatilities of interest rates; each of the foregoing factors can significantly and adversely affect the fair value of our interest rate sensitive instruments.
The above analysis utilizes assumptions and estimates based on management's judgment and experience, and relies on financial models, which are inherently imperfect; in fact, different models can produce different results for the same securities. While the table above reflects the estimated impacts of immediate parallel interest rate increases and decreases on specific categories of instruments in our portfolio, we intend to actively trade many of the instruments in our portfolio and intend to diversify our portfolio to reflect a portfolio comprised primarily of Agency RMBS, and, to a lesser extent, non-Agency RMBS and mortgage-related assets. Therefore, our current or future portfolios may have risks that differ significantly from those of our December 31, 2016 portfolio estimated above. Moreover, the impact of changing interest rates on fair value can change significantly when interest rates change by a greater amount than the hypothetical shifts assumed above. Furthermore, our portfolio is subject to many risks other than interest rate risks, and these additional risks may or may not be correlated with changes in interest rates. For all of the foregoing reasons and others, the table above is for illustrative purposes only and actual changes in interest rates would likely cause changes in the actual fair value of our portfolio that would differ from those presented above, and such differences might be significant and adverse. See "Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements."
Prepayment Risk
Prepayment risk is the risk of change, whether an increase or a decrease, in the rate at which principal is returned in respect to mortgage loans underlying RMBS, including both through voluntary prepayments and through liquidations due to defaults and foreclosures. This rate of prepayment is affected by a variety of factors, including the prevailing level of interest rates as well as economic, demographic, tax, social, legal, and other factors. Changes in prepayment rates will have varying effects on the different types of securities in our portfolio, and we attempt to take these effects into account in making asset management decisions. Additionally, increases in prepayment rates may cause us to experience losses on our investment in interest-only securities, or "IOs," and inverse interest only securities, or "IIOs," as these securities are extremely sensitive to prepayment rates. Finally, prepayment rates, besides being subject to interest rates and borrower behavior, are also substantially affected by government policy and regulation.
Credit Risk
We are subject to credit risk in connection with our assets, especially our non-Agency RMBS. Credit losses on real estate

loans underlying our non-Agency RMBS can occur for many reasons, including, but not limited to, poor origination practices, fraud, faulty appraisals, documentation errors, poor underwriting, legal errors, poor servicing practices, weak economic conditions, decline in the value of homes, special hazards, earthquakes and other natural events, over-leveraging of the borrower on the property, reduction in market rents and occupancies and poor property management services in the case of rented homes, changes in legal protections for lenders, reduction in personal income, job loss, and personal events such as divorce or health problems. Property values are subject to volatility and may be affected adversely by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, national, regional, and local economic conditions (which may be adversely affected by industry slowdowns and other factors), local real estate conditions (such as an oversupply of housing), changes or continued weakness in specific industry segments, construction quality, age and design, demographic factors, and retroactive changes to building or similar codes. For mortgage-related instruments, the two primary components of credit risk are default risk and severity risk.
Default Risk
Default risk is the risk that borrowers will fail to make principal and interest payments on their mortgage loans. Subject to qualifying and maintaining our qualification as a REIT and our exclusion from registration under the Investment Company Act, we may selectively attempt to mitigate our default risk by, among other things, opportunistically entering into credit default swaps and total return swaps. These instruments can reference various RMBS indices, corporate bond indices, or corporate entities, such as publicly traded REITs. We also rely on third-party mortgage servicers to mitigate our default risk, but such third-party mortgage servicers may have little or no economic incentive to mitigate loan default rates.
Severity Risk
Severity risk is the risk of loss upon a borrower default on a mortgage loan underlying our RMBS. Severity risk includes the risk of loss of value of the property underlying the mortgage loan as well as the risk of loss associated with taking over the property, including foreclosure costs. We rely on third-party mortgage servicers to mitigate our severity risk, but such third-party mortgage servicers may have little or no economic incentive to mitigate loan loss severities. Such mitigation efforts may include loan modification programs and prompt foreclosure and property liquidation following a default.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND DECEMBER 31, 2015, AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016, DECEMBER 31, 2015, AND DECEMBER 31, 2014:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
74
Consolidated Balance Sheet
75
Consolidated Statement of Operations
76
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity
77
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
78
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
79

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders of Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT and its subsidiaries (the "Company") at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, NY
March 13, 2017

ELLINGTON RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE REIT
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
(In thousands except for share amounts)   
ASSETS   
Cash and cash equivalents$33,504
 $40,166
Mortgage-backed securities, at fair value1,226,994
 1,242,266
Due from brokers49,518
 33,297
Financial derivatives–assets, at fair value6,008
 2,183
Reverse repurchase agreements75,012
 78,632
Receivable for securities sold33,199
 155,526
Interest receivable4,633
 4,325
Other assets266
 289
Total Assets$1,429,134
 $1,556,684
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY   
LIABILITIES
  
Repurchase agreements$1,197,973
 $1,222,719
Payable for securities purchased5,516
 98,949
Due to brokers1,055
 439
Financial derivatives–liabilities, at fair value1,975
 4,725
U.S. Treasury securities sold short, at fair value74,194
 78,447
Dividend payable3,652
 4,111
Accrued expenses647
 533
Management fee payable533
 545
Interest payable1,912
 1,361
Total Liabilities1,287,457
 1,411,829
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY   
Preferred shares, par value $0.01 per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized;
(0 shares issued and outstanding, respectively)
—
 —
Common shares, par value $0.01 per share, 500,000,000 shares authorized;
(9,130,897 and 9,135,103 shares issued and outstanding, respectively)
92
 92
Additional paid-in-capital180,996
 181,027
Accumulated deficit(39,411) (36,264)
Total Shareholders' Equity141,677
 144,855
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity$1,429,134
 $1,556,684


ELLINGTON RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE REIT
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
  Year Ended
December 31, 2016		 Year Ended
December 31, 2015		 Year Ended
December 31, 2014
(In thousands except for per share amounts)      
INTEREST INCOME (EXPENSE)      
Interest income $33,498
 $40,751
 $46,824
Interest expense (9,274) (6,236) (4,511)
Total net interest income 24,224
 34,515
 42,313
EXPENSES      
Management fees 2,129
 2,304
 2,285
Professional fees 668
 574
 986
Compensation expense 599
 621
 678
Other operating expenses 1,613
 1,646
 1,803
Total expenses 5,009
 5,145
 5,752
OTHER INCOME (LOSS)      
Net realized gains (losses) on securities 8,420
 9,577
 2,457
Net realized gains (losses) on financial derivatives (12,120) (23,432) (31,878)
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on securities (10,096) (18,904) 48,550
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on financial derivatives 6,487
 3,419
 (39,522)
Total other income (loss) (7,309) (29,340) (20,393)
NET INCOME $11,906
 $30
 $16,168
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE:      
Basic and Diluted $1.31
 $—
 $1.77
CASH DIVIDENDS PER COMMON SHARE:      
Dividends declared $1.65
 $2.00
 $2.20


ELLINGTON RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE REIT
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
 Common Shares 
Common
Shares,
par value
 Preferred Shares 
Preferred Shares,
par value
 Additional Paid-in-Capital Accumulated (Deficit) Earnings Total
(In thousands except for share amounts)             
BALANCE, December 31, 20139,139,842
 91
 —
 —
 181,147
 (14,058) 167,180
Share based compensation        135
   135
Issuance of restricted shares9,432
 —
 —
 —
 —
   —
Dividends declared          (20,118) (20,118)
Net income          16,168
 16,168
BALANCE, December 31, 20149,149,274
 $91
 —
 $—
 $181,282
 $(18,008) $163,365
Share based compensation        120
   120
Issuance of restricted shares15,390
 1
 —
 —
 —
   1
Repurchase of common shares(29,561) —
 —
 —
 (375)   (375)
Dividends declared          (18,286) (18,286)
Net income          30
 30
BALANCE, December 31, 20159,135,103
 92
 —
 —
 181,027
 (36,264) 144,855
Share based compensation        165
   165
Issuance of restricted shares13,714
 —
 —
 —
 —
   —
Repurchase of common shares(17,920) —
 —
 —
 (196)   (196)
Dividends declared          (15,053) (15,053)
Net income          11,906
 11,906
BALANCE, December 31, 20169,130,897
 $92
 —
 $—
 $180,996
 $(39,411) $141,677

ELLINGTON RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE REIT
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
  Year Ended
December 31, 2016		 Year Ended
December 31, 2015		 Year Ended
December 31, 2014
(In thousands)      
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities:      
Net income $11,906
 $30
 $16,168
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:      
Net realized (gains) losses on securities (8,420) (9,577) (2,457)
Change in net unrealized (gains) losses on securities 10,096
 18,904
 (48,550)
Net realized (gains) losses on financial derivatives 12,120
 23,432
 31,878
Change in net unrealized (gains) losses on financial derivatives (6,487) (3,419) 39,522
Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts (net) 15,785
 9,415
 7,174
Share based compensation 165
 120
 135
(Increase) decrease in assets:      
Due from brokers (16,221) (14,766) (184)
Interest receivable (308) 468
 (27)
Other assets 23
 28
 (134)
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:      
Due to brokers 616
 (144) (22,205)
Accrued expenses 114
 (357) 66
Interest payable 551
 674
 (77)
Management fees payable (12) (6) (49)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 19,928
 24,802
 21,260
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities:      
Purchases of securities (2,082,622) (2,020,500) (2,019,101)
Proceeds from sale of securities 1,965,304
 1,996,591
 1,934,237
Principal repayments of mortgage-backed securities 144,232
 136,726
 98,144
Proceeds from investments sold short 772,022
 799,493
 211,937
Repurchase of investments sold short (776,483) (734,495) (198,381)
Proceeds from disposition of financial derivatives 16,319
 14,241
 9,145
Purchase of financial derivatives (28,528) (37,341) (41,024)
Payments made on reverse repurchase agreements (16,623,353) (14,584,118) (1,094,706)
Proceeds from reverse repurchase agreements 16,626,972
 14,519,473
 1,080,719
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 13,863
 90,070
 (19,030)
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities:      
Offering costs paid —
 —
 (182)
Repurchase of common shares (196) (375) —
Dividends paid (15,511) (19,207) (19,656)
Borrowings under repurchase agreements 1,957,256
 2,660,924
 5,995,452
Repayments of repurchase agreements (1,982,002) (2,761,285) (5,982,719)
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities (40,453) (119,943) (7,105)
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (6,662) (5,071) (4,875)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD 40,166
 45,237
 50,112
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD $33,504
 $40,166
 $45,237
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:      
Interest paid $8,723
 $5,562
 $4,589
Dividends payable $3,652
 $4,111
 $5,032


ELLINGTON RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE REIT
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
1. Organization and Investment Objective
Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT, or "EARN," was formed as a Maryland real estate investment trust, or "REIT," on August 2, 2012, and commenced operations on September 25, 2012. EARN conducts its business through its wholly owned subsidiaries, EARN OP GP LLC, or the "General Partner," and Ellington Residential Mortgage LP, or the "Operating Partnership," which were formed as a Delaware limited liability company and a Delaware limited partnership, respectively, on July 31, 2012 and commenced operations on September 25, 2012. The Operating Partnership conducts its business of acquiring, investing in, and managing residential mortgage- and real estate-related assets through its wholly owned subsidiaries. EARN, the General Partner, the Operating Partnership, and their consolidated subsidiaries are hereafter defined as the "Company."
Ellington Residential Mortgage Management LLC, or the "Manager," serves as the Manager of the Company pursuant to the terms of the Fourth Amended and Restated Management Agreement, or the "Management Agreement." The Manager is an affiliate of Ellington Management Group, L.L.C., or "EMG," an investment management firm that is an SEC-registered investment adviser with a 22-year history of investing in a broad spectrum of mortgage-backed securities and related derivatives, with an emphasis on the residential mortgage-backed securities, or "RMBS," market. In accordance with the terms of the Management Agreement and the Services Agreement (as described in Note 9), the Manager is responsible for administering the Company's business activities and day-to-day operations, and performs certain services, subject to oversight by the Board of Trustees. See Note 9 for further information on the Management Agreement.
The Company acquires and manages RMBS, for which the principal and interest payments are guaranteed by a U.S. government agency or a U.S. government-sponsored entity, or "Agency RMBS," and RMBS that do not carry such guarantees, or "non-Agency RMBS," such as RMBS backed by prime jumbo, Alternative A-paper, manufactured housing, and subprime residential mortgage loans. Agency RMBS include both Agency pools and Agency collateralized mortgage obligations, or "CMOs," and non-Agency RMBS primarily consist of non-Agency CMOs, both investment grade and non-investment grade. The Company may also acquire and manage mortgage servicing rights, residential mortgage loans, and other mortgage- and real estate-related assets. The Company may also invest in other instruments including, but not limited to, forward-settling To-Be-Announced Agency pass-through certificates, or "TBAs," interest rate swaps and swaptions, U.S. Treasury securities, Eurodollar and U.S. Treasury futures, other financial derivatives, and cash equivalents. The Company's targeted investments may range from unrated first loss securities to AAA senior securities.
The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or "the Code," and intends to conduct its operations to be qualified and taxed as a REIT. As a REIT, the Company is required to distribute annually at least 90% of its taxable income. As long as the Company continues to qualify as a REIT, it will not be subject to U.S. federal corporate taxes on its taxable income to the extent that it distributes all of its annual taxable income to its shareholders. It is the intention of the Company to distribute at least 100% of its taxable income, after application of available tax attributes, within the time limits prescribed by the Code, which may extend into the subsequent taxable year.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
(A) Basis of Presentation: The Company's consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, or "U.S. GAAP." Entities in which the Company has a controlling financial interest, through ownership of the majority of the entities' voting equity interests, or through other contractual rights that give the Company control, are consolidated by the Company. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and those differences could be material.
(B) Valuation: The Company applies ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurement ("ASC 820-10"), to its holdings of financial instruments. ASC 820-10 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the observability of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:
Level 1—inputs to the valuation methodology are observable and reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Currently, the types of financial instruments the Company generally includes in this category are exchange-traded derivatives;


Level 2—inputs to the valuation methodology other than quoted prices included in Level 1 are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Currently, the types of financial instruments that the Company generally includes in this category are Agency RMBS, non-Agency RMBS determined to have sufficiently observable market data, U.S. Treasury securities, actively traded derivatives such as TBAs, interest rate swaps, and swaptions; and
Level 3—inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. Currently, this category includes RMBS where there is less price transparency.
For certain financial instruments, the various inputs that management uses to measure fair value for such financial instrument may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the determination of which category within the fair value hierarchy is appropriate for such financial instrument is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 prioritizes the various inputs that management uses to measure fair value with the highest priority to inputs that are observable and reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets (Level 1) and the lowest priority to inputs that are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement (Level 3). The assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the financial instrument. The Company may use valuation techniques consistent with the market and income approaches to measure the fair value of its assets and liabilities. The market approach uses third-party valuations and information obtained from market transactions involving identical or similar assets or liabilities. The income approach uses projections of the future economic benefits of an instrument to determine its fair value, such as in the discounted cash flow methodology. The inputs or methodology used for valuing financial instruments are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in these financial instruments. Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are assumed to occur at the end of the reporting period.
Summary Valuation Techniques
For financial instruments that are traded in an "active market," the best measure of fair value is the quoted market price. However, many of the Company's financial instruments are not traded in an active market. Therefore, management generally uses third-party valuations when available. If third-party valuations are not available, management uses other valuation techniques, such as the discounted cash flow methodology. The following are summary descriptions, for the various categories of financial instruments, of the valuation methodologies management uses in determining fair value of the Company's financial instruments in such categories. Management utilizes such methodologies to assign a good faith fair value (the estimated price that, in an orderly transaction at the valuation date, would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, as the case may be) to each such financial instrument.
Valuations for fixed rate RMBS pass-throughs issued by a U.S government agency or government-sponsored enterprise, or "GSE," are typically based on observable pay-up data (pay-ups are price premiums for specified categories of fixed rate pools relative to their TBA counterparts) or models that use observable market data, such as interest rates and historical prepayment speeds, and are validated against third-party valuations. With respect to the Company's other RMBS investments and TBAs, management seeks to obtain at least one third-party valuation, and often obtains multiple valuations when available. Management has been able to obtain third-party valuations on the vast majority of these instruments and expects to continue to solicit third-party valuations in the future. Management generally values each financial instrument at the average of third-party valuations received and not rejected as described below. Third-party valuations are not binding, and while management generally does not adjust the valuations it receives, management may challenge or reject a valuation when, based on its validation criteria, management determines that such valuation is unreasonable or erroneous. Furthermore, based on its validation criteria, management may determine that the average of the third-party valuations received for a given instrument does not result in what management believes to be the fair value of such instrument, and in such circumstances management may override this average with its own good faith valuation. The validation criteria may take into account output from management's own models, recent trading activity in the same or similar instruments, and valuations received from third parties. The use of proprietary models requires the use of a significant amount of judgment and the application of various assumptions including, but not limited to, assumptions concerning future prepayment rates and default rates.
Given their relatively high level of price transparency, Agency RMBS pass-throughs and TBAs are typically designated as Level 2 assets, although Agency interest only and inverse interest only RMBS are currently designated as Level 3 assets since they generally have less price transparency. Non-Agency RMBS are generally classified as either Level 2 or Level 3 based on analysis of available market data such as recent trades and executable bids. Furthermore, the methodology used by the third-party valuation providers is reviewed at least annually by management, so as to ascertain whether such providers are utilizing observable market data to determine the valuations that they provide.


Interest rate swaps and swaptions are typically valued based on internal models that use observable market data, including applicable interest rates in effect as of the measurement date; the model-generated valuations are then typically compared to counterparty valuations for reasonableness. These financial derivatives are generally designated as Level 2 instruments.
In valuing its derivatives, the Company also considers the creditworthiness of both the Company and its counterparties, along with collateral provisions contained in each derivative agreement.
The Company's repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. Repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements are classified as Level 2 assets and liabilities based on the adequacy of the collateral and their short term nature.
The Company's valuation process, including the application of validation criteria, is overseen by the Manager's Valuation Committee. The Valuation Committee includes senior level executives from various departments within the Manager, and each quarter the Valuation Committee reviews and approves the valuations of the Company's investments. The valuation process also includes a monthly review by the Company's third party administrator. The goal of this review is to replicate various aspects of the Company's valuation process based on the Company's documented procedures.
Because of the inherent uncertainty of valuation, the estimated fair value of the Company's financial instruments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the financial instruments existed, and the differences could be material to the consolidated financial statements.
(C) Accounting for Securities: Purchases and sales of investments are recorded on trade date and realized and unrealized gains and losses are calculated based on identified cost.
The Company has chosen to make a fair value election pursuant to ASC 825-10, Financial Instruments, for its securities portfolio. Electing the fair value option allows the Company to record changes in fair value in the Consolidated Statement of Operations, which, in management's view, more appropriately reflects the results of operations for a particular reporting period as all securities activities will be recorded in a similar manner. As such, securities are recorded at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and the period change in fair value is recorded in current period earnings on the Consolidated Statement of Operations as a component of Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on securities.
(D) Interest Income: Coupon interest income on investment securities is accrued based on the outstanding principal balance or notional amount and the current coupon rate on each security. The Company amortizes purchase premiums and accretes purchase discounts on its fixed income securities. For RMBS that are deemed to be of high credit quality at the time of purchase, premiums and discounts are generally amortized/accreted into interest income over the life of such securities using the effective interest method. For securities whose cash flows vary depending on prepayments, an effective yield retroactive to the time of purchase is periodically recomputed based on actual prepayments and changes in projected prepayment activity, and a catch-up adjustment, or "Catch-up Premium Amortization Adjustment," is made to amortization to reflect the cumulative impact of the change in effective yield. For RMBS that are deemed not to be of high credit quality at the time of purchase, interest income is recognized based on the effective interest method. For purposes of determining the effective interest rate, management estimates the future expected cash flows of its investment holdings based on assumptions including, but not limited to, assumptions for future prepayment rates, default rates, and loss severities (each of which may in turn incorporate various macro-economic assumptions, such as future housing prices). These assumptions are re-evaluated not less than quarterly. Principal write-offs are generally treated as realized losses. Changes in projected cash flows, as applied to the current amortized cost of the security, may result in a prospective change in the yield/interest income recognized on such securities.
The Company's accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on securities for U.S. federal and other tax purposes is likely to differ from the accounting treatment under U.S. GAAP of these items as described above.
(E) Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents include cash and short term investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of acquisition. Cash and cash equivalents typically include amounts held in an interest bearing overnight account and amounts held in money market funds, and these balances generally exceed insured limits. The Company holds its cash at institutions that it believes to be highly creditworthy.
(F) Due from brokers/Due to brokers: Due from brokers and Due to brokers accounts on the Consolidated Balance Sheet include collateral transferred to or received from counterparties, including clearinghouses, along with receivables and payables for open and/or closed derivative positions.
(G) Financial Derivatives: The Company enters into various types of financial derivatives subject to its investment guidelines, which include restrictions associated with maintaining its qualification as a REIT. The Company's financial derivatives are predominantly subject to bilateral collateral arrangements or clearing in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Wall


Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. The Company may be required to deliver or may receive cash or securities as collateral upon entering into derivative transactions. In addition, changes in the relative value of financial derivative transactions may require the Company or the counterparty to post or receive additional collateral. In the case of cleared financial derivatives, the clearinghouse becomes the Company's counterparty and a futures commission merchant acts as intermediary between the Company and the clearinghouse with respect to all facets of the related transaction, including the posting and receipt of required collateral. Collateral received by the Company is reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as "Due to Brokers." Conversely, collateral posted by the Company is reflected as "Due from Brokers" on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The types of financial derivatives that have been utilized by the Company to date are interest rate swaps, TBAs, swaptions, and futures.
Swaps: The Company enters into interest rate swaps. Interest rate swaps are contractual agreements whereby one party pays a floating interest rate on a notional principal amount and receives a fixed rate payment on the same notional principal, or vice versa, for a fixed period of time. The Company enters into interest rate swap contracts primarily to mitigate interest rate risk. The Company is subject to interest rate risk exposure in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives.
Swaps change in value with movements in interest rates or total return of the reference securities. During the term of swap contracts, changes in value are recognized as unrealized gains or losses on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. When a contract is terminated, the Company realizes a gain or loss equal to the difference between the proceeds from (or cost of) the closing transaction and the Company's basis in the contract, if any. Periodic payments or receipts required by swap agreements are recorded as unrealized gains or losses when accrued and realized gains or losses when received or paid. Upfront payments paid and/or received by the Company to open swap contracts are recorded as an asset and/or liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and are recorded as a realized gain or loss on the termination date.
TBA Securities: The Company transacts in the forward settling TBA market. A TBA position is a forward contract for the purchase ("long position") or sale ("short position") of Agency RMBS at a predetermined price, face amount, issuer, coupon, and maturity on an agreed-upon future delivery date. For each TBA contract and delivery month, a uniform settlement date for all market participants is determined by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association. The specific Agency RMBS to be delivered into the contract at the settlement date are not known at the time of the transaction. The Company typically does not take delivery of TBAs, but rather enters into offsetting transactions and settles the associated receivable and payable balances with its counterparties. The Company primarily uses TBAs to mitigate interest rate risk, but from time to time it also holds net long positions in certain TBA securities as a means of acquiring exposure to Agency RMBS.
TBAs are accounted for by the Company as financial derivatives. The difference between the contract price and the fair value of the TBA position as of the reporting date is included in Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on financial derivatives in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Upon settlement of the TBA contract, the realized gain (loss) on the TBA contract is equal to the net cash amount received (paid).
Options: The Company enters into swaption contracts. It may purchase or write put, call, straddle, or other similar options contracts. The Company enters into options contracts primarily to help mitigate interest rate risk. When the Company purchases an options contract, the option asset is initially recorded at an amount equal to the premium paid, if any, and is subsequently marked-to-market. Premiums paid for purchasing options contracts that expire unexercised are recognized on the expiration date as realized losses. If an options contract is exercised, the premium paid is subtracted from the proceeds of the sale or added to the cost of the purchase to determine whether the Company has realized a gain or loss on the related investment transaction. When the Company writes an options contract, the option liability is initially recorded at an amount equal to the premium received, if any, and is subsequently marked-to-market. Premiums received for writing options contracts that expire unexercised are recognized on the expiration date as realized gains. If an options contract is exercised, the premium received is subtracted from the cost of the purchase or added to the proceeds of the sale to determine whether the Company has realized a gain or loss on the related investment transaction. When the Company enters into a closing transaction, the Company will realize a gain or loss depending upon whether the amount from the closing transaction is greater or less than the premiums paid or received. In general, the Company's options contracts contain forward-settling premiums. In this case, no money is exchanged upfront; instead, the agreed-upon premium is paid by the buyer upon expiration of the options contract, regardless of whether or not the options contract is exercised. Unrealized gains or (losses) resulting from the options contract being marked-to-market are included in Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on financial derivatives in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Realized gains or (losses) are included in Realized gains (losses) on financial derivatives in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Futures Contracts: The Company enters into Eurodollar futures contracts and U.S. Treasury futures contracts. A futures contract is an exchange-traded agreement to buy or sell an asset for a set price on a future date. Initial margin deposits are made upon entering into futures contracts and can be either in the form of cash or securities. During the period the futures contract is open, changes in the value of the contract are recognized as unrealized gains or losses by marking-to-market to reflect the


current market value of the contract. Unrealized gains or (losses) are included in Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on financial derivatives in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Variation margin payments are made or received periodically, depending upon whether unrealized losses or gains are incurred. When the contract is closed, the Company records a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the proceeds of the closing transaction and the Company's basis in the contract. Realized gains or (losses) are included in Realized gains (losses) on financial derivatives in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Financial derivative assets are included in Financial derivatives–assets, at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet while financial derivative liabilities are included in Financial derivatives–liabilities, at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(H) Repurchase Agreements: The Company enters into repurchase agreements with third-party broker-dealers, whereby it sells securities under agreements to repurchase at an agreed upon price and date. The Company accounts for repurchase agreements as collateralized borrowings, with the initial sale price representing the amount borrowed, and with the future repurchase price consisting of the amount borrowed plus interest, at the implied interest rate of the repurchase agreement, on the amount borrowed over the term of the repurchase agreement. The interest rate on a repurchase agreement is based on competitive market rates (or competitive market spreads, in the case of agreements with floating interest rates) at the time such agreement is entered into. When the Company enters into a repurchase agreement, the lender establishes and maintains an account containing cash and/or securities having a value not less than the repurchase price, including accrued interest, of the repurchase agreement. Repurchase agreements are carried at their contractual amounts, which approximate fair value due to their short-term nature.
(I) Reverse Repurchase Agreements: The Company enters into reverse repurchase agreement transactions with third-party broker-dealers, whereby it purchases securities under agreements to resell at an agreed upon price and date. The interest rate on a reverse repurchase agreement is based on competitive market rates (or competitive market spreads, in the case of agreements with floating interest rates) at the time such agreement is entered into. Reverse repurchase agreements are carried at their contractual amounts, which approximate fair value due to their short-term nature.
Repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements that are conducted with the same counterparty can be reported on a net basis if they meet the requirements of ASC 210-20, Balance Sheet Offsetting. There are currently no repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements reported on a net basis in the Company's consolidated financial statements.
(J) Securities Sold Short: The Company may purchase or engage in short sales of U.S. Treasury securities to mitigate the potential impact of changes in interest rates on the performance of its portfolio. When the Company sells securities short, it typically satisfies its security delivery settlement obligation by obtaining the security sold short from the same or a different counterparty. The Company generally is required to deliver cash or securities as collateral to the counterparty for the Company's obligation to return the borrowed security.
The Company has chosen to make a fair value election pursuant to ASC 825-10, Financial Instruments, for its securities sold short. Electing the fair value option allows the Company to record changes in fair value in the Consolidated Statement of Operations, which, in management's view, more appropriately reflects the results of operations for a particular reporting period as all securities activities will be recorded in a similar manner. As such, securities sold short are recorded at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and the period change in fair value is recorded in current period earnings on the Consolidated Statement of Operations as a component of Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on securities. A realized gain or loss will be recognized upon the termination of a short sale if the market price is less or greater than the proceeds originally received. Such realized gain or loss is recorded on the Company's Consolidated Statement of Operations in Net realized gains (losses) on securities.
(K) Offering Costs/Deferred Offering Costs: Offering costs are charged against shareholders' equity within Additional paid-in-capital, and typically include legal, accounting, printing, and other fees associated with the cost of raising equity capital.
(L) Share Based Compensation: The Company applies the provisions of ASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation ("ASC 718"), with regard to its equity incentive plans. ASC 718 covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. ASC 718 requires that compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements. The cost is measured based on the fair value, at the grant date, of the equity or liability instruments issued and is amortized over the vesting period. Restricted shares issued to the Company's independent directors and partially dedicated personnel are participating securities and receive dividends prior to vesting. Fair value for such awards is based on the closing stock price on the New York Stock Exchange at the grant date. The vesting period for restricted share awards is typically one to two years.


(M) Dividends: Dividends payable are recorded on the declaration date.
(N) Expenses: Expenses are recognized as incurred on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
(O) Earnings Per Share: In accordance with the provisions of ASC 260, Earnings per Share, the Company calculates basic income (loss) per share by dividing net income (loss) for the period by the weighted average of the Company's common shares outstanding for that period. Diluted income (loss) per share takes into account the effect of dilutive instruments, such as share options and warrants, and uses the average share price for the period in determining the number of incremental shares that are to be added to the weighted average number of shares outstanding.
(P) Share Repurchases: Common shares that are repurchased by the Company subsequent to issuance decrease the total number of shares issued and outstanding and are immediately retired upon settlement. The cost of such share repurchases is charged against Additional paid-in-capital on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(Q) Income Taxes: The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 to 860 of the Code. As a REIT, the Company is generally not subject to corporate-level federal and state income tax on net income it distributes to its shareholders. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including the distribution of at least 90% of its annual taxable income to shareholders. Even if the Company qualifies as a REIT, it may be subject to certain federal, state, local and foreign taxes on its income and property and to federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed taxable income. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT, and does not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, it will be subject to U.S. federal, state, and local income taxes and may be precluded from qualifying as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which the Company fails to qualify as a REIT.
The Company follows the authoritative guidance on accounting for and disclosure of uncertainty on tax positions, which requires management to determine whether a tax position of the Company is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. For uncertain tax positions, the tax benefit to be recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company did not have any unrecognized tax benefits resulting from tax positions related to the current period or to 2015, 2014, or 2013 (its open tax years). In the normal course of business, the Company may be subject to examination by federal, state, local, and foreign jurisdictions, where applicable, for the current period, 2015, 2014, and 2013 (its open tax years). The Company may take positions with respect to certain tax issues which depend on legal interpretation of facts or applicable tax regulations. Should the relevant tax regulators successfully challenge any of such positions, the Company might be found to have a tax liability that has not been recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Also, management's conclusions regarding the authoritative guidance may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based on changing tax laws, regulations, and interpretations thereof. There were no amounts accrued for penalties or interest as of or during the periods presented in these consolidated financial statements.
(R) Recent Accounting Pronouncements:Under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, or the "JOBS Act," the Company meets the definition of an "emerging growth company." The Company has elected to follow the extended transition period for complying with new or revised U.S. accounting standards pursuant to Section 107(b) of the JOBS Act. As a result, the Company will comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for non-public entities.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern ("ASU 2014-15"). ASU 2014-15 requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide disclosure if events or conditions arise that would place substantial doubt on the entity's ability to continue as a going concern. ASU 2014-15 is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and subsequent interim and annual periods with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-15 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis ("ASU 2015-02"). This amends ASC 810, Consolidation (ASC "810"), to improve targeted areas of consolidation guidance by simplifying the requirements of consolidation and placing more emphasis on risk of loss when determining a controlling financial interest. ASU 2015-02 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU 2015-02 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.


3. Mortgage-Backed Securities
The following tables present details of the Company's mortgage-backed securities portfolio at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company's Agency RMBS include mortgage pass-through certificates and CMOs representing interests in or obligations backed by pools of residential mortgage loans issued or guaranteed by a U.S. government agency or GSE. The non-Agency RMBS portfolio is not issued or guaranteed by the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or any agency of the U.S. Government and is therefore subject to greater credit risk.
By RMBS Type
December 31, 2016:
($ in thousands)      Gross Unrealized   Weighted Average
 Current Principal Unamortized Premium (Discount) 
Amortized
Cost
 Gains Losses Fair Value Coupon Yield 
Life
(Years)(1)
Agency RMBS:                 
15-year fixed rate mortgages$141,829
 $7,044
 $148,873
 $405
 $(915) $148,363
 3.41% 2.19% 4.75
20-year fixed rate mortgages10,488
 787
 11,275
 25
 (115) 11,185
 4.00% 2.51% 6.33
30-year fixed rate mortgages888,976
 59,181
 948,157
 3,158
 (10,858) 940,457
 3.99% 2.81% 8.34
Adjustable rate mortgages31,656
 1,570
 33,226
 121
 (209) 33,138
 3.84% 2.37% 4.63
Reverse mortgages57,411
 5,703
 63,114
 100
 (1,156) 62,058
 4.51% 2.61% 6.07
Interest only securities n/a  n/a 11,841
 1,465
 (959) 12,347
 3.97% 2.75% 3.11
Total Agency RMBS1,130,360
 74,285
 1,216,486
 5,274
 (14,212) 1,207,548
 3.94% 2.71% 7.24
Non-Agency RMBS27,794
 (9,526) 18,268
 1,550
 (372) 19,446
 2.93% 7.82% 7.01
Total RMBS$1,158,154
 $64,759
 $1,234,754
 $6,824
 $(14,584) $1,226,994
 3.92% 2.78% 7.24
(1)
Average lives of RMBS are generally shorter than stated contractual maturities. Average lives are affected by the contractual maturities of the underlying mortgages, scheduled periodic payments of principal, and unscheduled prepayments of principal.
December 31, 2015:
($ in thousands)      Gross Unrealized   Weighted Average
 Current Principal Unamortized Premium (Discount) 
Amortized
Cost
 Gains Losses Fair Value Coupon Yield 
Life
(Years)(1)
Agency RMBS:                 
15-year fixed rate mortgages$162,546
 $7,839
 $170,385
 $531
 $(655) $170,261
 3.38% 2.31% 4.99
20-year fixed rate mortgages18,477
 1,277
 19,754
 153
 (77) 19,830
 4.00% 2.75% 6.50
30-year fixed rate mortgages842,524
 53,832
 896,356
 8,117
 (3,679) 900,794
 4.12% 3.11% 8.29
Adjustable rate mortgages36,433
 2,196
 38,629
 81
 (180) 38,530
 4.05% 2.68% 5.44
Reverse mortgages68,690
 6,515
 75,205
 34
 (1,547) 73,692
 4.63% 2.54% 5.64
Interest only securities n/a  n/a 8,491
 248
 (981) 7,758
 3.82% 3.30% 2.36
Total Agency RMBS1,128,670
 71,659
 1,208,820
 9,164
 (7,119) 1,210,865
 4.03% 2.94% 7.16
Non-Agency RMBS48,408
 (18,013) 30,395
 2,264
 (1,258) 31,401
 2.48% 20.97% 4.81
Total RMBS$1,177,078
 $53,646
 $1,239,215
 $11,428
 $(8,377) $1,242,266
 3.97% 3.39% 7.07
(1)Average lives of RMBS are generally shorter than stated contractual maturities. Average lives are affected by the contractual maturities of the underlying mortgages, scheduled periodic payments of principal, and unscheduled prepayments of principal.


By Estimated Weighted Average Life
As of December 31, 2016:
($ in thousands) Agency RMBS Agency Interest Only Securities Non-Agency RMBS
Estimated Weighted Average Life(1)
 
Fair
Value
 Amortized Cost Weighted Average Coupon Fair Value Amortized Cost Weighted Average Coupon Fair Value Amortized Cost Weighted Average Coupon
Less than three years $15,009
 $14,956
 4.43% $3,748
 $4,289
 3.56% $—
 $—
 —%
Greater than three years and less than seven years 286,517
 286,984
 3.87% 8,599
 7,552
 4.39% 11,316
 11,314
 3.90%
Greater than seven years and less than eleven years 890,277
 899,220
 3.96% —
 —
 —% 8,130
 6,954
 1.95%
Greater than eleven years 3,398
 3,485
 4.00% —
 —
 —% —
 —
 —%
Total $1,195,201
 $1,204,645
 3.94% $12,347
 $11,841
 3.97% $19,446
 $18,268
 2.93%
(1)Average lives of RMBS are generally shorter than stated contractual maturities.
As of December 31, 2015:
($ in thousands) Agency RMBS Agency Interest Only Securities Non-Agency RMBS
Estimated Weighted Average Life(1)
 
Fair
Value
 Amortized Cost Weighted Average Coupon Fair Value Amortized Cost Weighted Average Coupon Fair Value Amortized Cost Weighted Average Coupon
Less than three years $30,054
 $30,227
 4.76% $4,974
 $5,701
 3.55% $2,558
 $1,543
 3.21%
Greater than three years and less than seven years 273,477
 273,107
 3.78% 2,784
 2,790
 4.97% 24,736
 25,478
 2.66%
Greater than seven years and less than eleven years 893,730
 891,112
 4.10% —
 —
 —% 4,107
 3,374
 0.55%
Greater than eleven years 5,846
 5,883
 3.81% —
 —
 —% —
 —
 —%
Total $1,203,107
 $1,200,329
 4.04% $7,758
 $8,491
 3.82% $31,401
 $30,395
 2.48%
(1)Average lives of RMBS are generally shorter than stated contractual maturities.
The following table reflects the components of interest income on the Company's RMBS for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014:
  
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
 Year Ended
December 31, 2015		 
Year Ended
December 31, 2014
($ in thousands) Coupon Interest Net Amortization 
Interest
Income
 Coupon Interest Net Amortization 
Interest
Income
 Coupon Interest Net Amortization 
Interest
Income
Agency RMBS $47,850
 $(16,849) $31,001
 $49,028
 $(11,482) $37,546
 $52,755
 $(9,112) $43,643
Non-Agency RMBS 1,091
 1,097
 2,188
 1,153
 2,005
 3,158
 1,237
 1,930
 3,167
Total $48,941
 $(15,752) $33,189
 $50,181
 $(9,477) $40,704
 $53,992
 $(7,182) $46,810
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 the Catch-up Premium Amortization Adjustment to net amortization was $(2.1) million, $(1.1) million, and $0.6 million, respectively.


4. Valuation
The following tables present the Company's financial instruments measured at fair value on:
December 31, 2016:
(In thousands)        
Description Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets:        
Mortgage-backed securities, at fair value:        
Agency RMBS:        
15-year fixed rate mortgages $—
 $148,363
 $—
 $148,363
20-year fixed rate mortgages —
 11,185
 —
 11,185
30-year fixed rate mortgages —
 940,457
 —
 940,457
Adjustable rate mortgages —
 33,138
 —
 33,138
Reverse mortgages —
 62,058
 —
 62,058
Interest only securities —
 —
 12,347
 12,347
Non-Agency RMBS —
 12,948
 6,498
 19,446
Mortgage-backed securities, at fair value —
 1,208,149
 18,845
 1,226,994
Financial derivatives–assets, at fair value:        
TBAs —
 1,045
 —
 1,045
Interest rate swaps —
 4,891
 —
 4,891
Futures 72
 —
 —
 72
Total financial derivatives–assets, at fair value 72
 5,936
 —
 6,008
Total mortgage-backed securities and financial derivatives–assets, at fair value $72
 $1,214,085
 $18,845
 $1,233,002
Liabilities:        
U.S. Treasury securities sold short, at fair value $—
 $(74,194) $—
 $(74,194)
Financial derivatives–liabilities, at fair value:        
TBAs —
 (554) —
 (554)
Interest rate swaps —
 (1,421) —
 (1,421)
Total financial derivatives–liabilities, at fair value —
 (1,975) —
 (1,975)
Total U.S. Treasury securities sold short and financial derivatives–liabilities, at fair value $—
 $(76,169) $—
 $(76,169)


December 31, 2015:
(In thousands)        
Description Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets:        
Mortgage-backed securities, at fair value:        
Agency RMBS:        
15-year fixed rate mortgages $—
 $170,261
 $—
 $170,261
20-year fixed rate mortgages —
 19,830
 —
 19,830
30-year fixed rate mortgages —
 900,794
 —
 900,794
Adjustable rate mortgages —
 38,530
 —
 38,530
Reverse mortgages —
 73,692
 —
 73,692
Interest only securities —
 —
 7,758
 7,758
Non-Agency RMBS —
 27,381
 4,020
 31,401
Mortgage-backed securities, at fair value —
 1,230,488
 11,778
 1,242,266
Financial derivatives–assets, at fair value:        
TBAs —
 417
 —
 417
Interest rate swaps —
 1,748
 —
 1,748
Futures 18
 —
 —
 18
Total financial derivatives–assets, at fair value 18
 2,165
 —
 2,183
Total mortgage-backed securities and financial derivatives–assets, at fair value $18
 $1,232,653
 $11,778
 $1,244,449
Liabilities:        
U.S. Treasury securities sold short, at fair value $—
 $(78,447) $—
 $(78,447)
Financial derivatives–liabilities, at fair value:        
TBAs —
 (364) —
 (364)
Interest rate swaps —
 (4,361) —
 (4,361)
Total financial derivatives–liabilities, at fair value —
 (4,725) —
 (4,725)
Total U.S. Treasury securities sold short and financial derivatives–liabilities, at fair value $—
 $(83,172) $—
 $(83,172)
The following tables present additional information about the Company's investments which are measured at fair value for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value:
Year ended December 31, 2016:
(In thousands)Non-Agency RMBS Agency RMBS
Beginning balance as of December 31, 2015$4,020
 $7,758
Purchases2,608
 7,188
Proceeds from sales(1,270) —
Principal repayments(1,256) —
(Amortization)/accretion, net344
 (3,535)
Net realized gains (losses)1,079
 (303)
Change in net unrealized gains (losses)(571) 1,239
Transfers:   
Transfers into level 33,120
 —
Transfers out of level 3(1,576) —
Ending balance as of December 31, 2016$6,498
 $12,347
All amounts of net realized and changes in net unrealized gains (losses) in the table above are reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations. The table above incorporates changes in net unrealized gains (losses) for both Level 3 financial instruments held by the Company at December 31, 2016, as well as Level 3 financial instruments


disposed of by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2016. For Level 3 financial instruments held by the Company as of December 31, 2016, change in net unrealized gains (losses) of $0.8 million and $1.1 million, for the year ended December 31, 2016 relate to non-Agency RMBS and Agency RMBS, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company transferred $1.6 million of non-Agency RMBS from Level 3 to Level 2. These assets were transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 based on an increased volume of observed trading of these and/or similar assets. This increase in observed trading activity has led to greater price transparency for these assets, thereby making a Level 2 designation appropriate in the Company's view. However, changes in the volume of observable inputs for these assets, such as a decrease in the volume of observed trading, could impact price transparency, and thereby cause a change in the level designation for these assets in future periods.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company transferred $3.1 million of non-Agency RMBS from Level 2 to Level 3. Since December 31, 2015, these securities have exhibited indications of a reduced level of price transparency. Examples of such indications include wider spreads and/or higher delinquencies relative to similar securities and a reduction in observable transactions or executable quotes involving these and similar securities. Changes in these indications could impact price transparency, and thereby cause a change in the level designation in future periods.
Year ended December 31, 2015:
(In thousands)Non-Agency RMBS Agency RMBS
Beginning balance as of December 31, 2014$10,082
 $11,244
Purchases—
 4,360
Proceeds from sales(2,861) (4,538)
Principal repayments(1,765) —
(Amortization)/accretion, net1,371
 (2,714)
Net realized gains (losses)791
 602
Change in net unrealized gains (losses)(496) (1,196)
Transfers:   
Transfers into level 31,681
 —
Transfers out of level 3(4,783) —
Ending balance as of December 31, 2015$4,020
 $7,758
All amounts of net realized and changes in net unrealized gains (losses) in the table above are reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations. The table above incorporates changes in net unrealized gains (losses) for both Level 3 financial instruments held by the Company as of December 31, 2015, as well as Level 3 financial instruments disposed of by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2015. For Level 3 financial instruments held by the Company as of December 31, 2015, change in net unrealized gains (losses) of $(0.3) million and $(0.3) million, for the year ended December 31, 2015 relate to non-Agency RMBS and Agency RMBS, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company transferred $4.8 million of non-Agency RMBS from Level 3 to Level 2. These assets were transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 based on an increased volume of observed trading of these and/or similar assets. This increase in observed trading activity has led to greater price transparency for these assets, thereby making a Level 2 designation appropriate in the Company's view. However, changes in the volume of observable inputs for these assets, such as a decrease in the volume of observed trading, could impact price transparency, and thereby cause a change in the level designation for these assets in future periods.
During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company transferred $1.7 million of non-Agency RMBS from Level 2 to Level 3. Following December 31, 2014, these securities exhibited indications of a reduced level of price transparency. Examples of such indications include wider spreads and/or higher delinquencies relative to similar securities and a reduction in observable transactions or executable quotes involving these and similar securities. Changes in these indications could impact price transparency, and thereby cause a change in the level designation in future periods.


Year ended December 31, 2014:
(In thousands)Non-Agency RMBS Agency RMBS
Beginning balance as of December 31, 2013$30,681
 $13,527
Purchases14,712
 4,853
Proceeds from sales(11,104) (2,330)
Principal repayments(5,443) —
(Amortization)/accretion, net1,930
 (3,136)
Net realized gains (losses)1,518
 676
Change in net unrealized gains (losses)207
 (2,346)
Transfers:   
Transfers into level 3—
 —
Transfers out of level 3(22,419) —
Ending balance as of December 31, 2014$10,082
 $11,244
All amounts of net realized and changes in net unrealized gains (losses) in the table above are reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations. The table above incorporates changes in net unrealized gains (losses) for both Level 3 financial instruments held by the Company as of December 31, 2014, as well as Level 3 financial instruments disposed of by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2014. For Level 3 financial instruments held by the Company as of December 31, 2014, change in net unrealized gains (losses) of $0.7 million and $(2.0) million, for the year ended December 31, 2014 relate to non-Agency RMBS and Agency RMBS, respectively.
At December 31, 2014, the Company transferred $22.4 million of non-Agency RMBS from Level 3 to Level 2. The decision to transfer these assets from Level 3 to Level 2 was based on observed market developments, including an increased volume of buying and selling of these and/or similar assets, greater consensus among market participants on price based on market quotes, and generally tighter credit spreads driven by improved performance in the underlying collateral as well as increased demand from investors seeking higher yielding assets. These factors have led to greater price transparency for these assets, thereby making a Level 2 designation appropriate in the Company's view. However, changes in observed market developments could impact future price transparency, and thereby cause a change in the level designation in subsequent periods.
There were no transfers of financial instruments between Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, or 2014.


The following tables identify the significant unobservable inputs that affect the valuation of the Company's Level 3 assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:
December 31, 2016:
  Range  
Description Fair Value Valuation Technique 
Significant
Unobservable Input
 Min Max 
Weighted Average(1)
  (In thousands)          
Non-Agency RMBS $652
 Discounted Cash Flows Yield 30.6% 30.6% 30.6%
      Projected Collateral Prepayments 49.0% 49.0% 49.0%
      Projected Collateral Losses 1.0% 1.0% 1.0%
      Projected Collateral Recoveries 3.3% 3.3% 3.3%
      Projected Collateral Scheduled Amortization 46.7% 46.7% 46.7%
            100.0%
Non-Agency RMBS 5,846
 Market quotes Non-Binding Third-Party Valuation $46.40
 $63.29
 $56.49
Agency RMBS–Interest Only Securities 8,784
 Market quotes Non-Binding Third-Party Valuation $3.94
 $21.56
 $13.96
Agency RMBS–Interest Only Securities 3,563
 Option Adjusted Spread ("OAS") 
LIBOR OAS (2)
 103
 1,147
 468
      Projected Collateral Prepayments 51.1% 85.4% 70.9%
      Projected Collateral Scheduled Amortization 14.6% 48.9% 29.1%
            100.0%
(1)Averages are weighted based on the fair value of the related instrument.
(2)Shown in basis points.
December 31, 2015:
  Range  
Description Fair Value Valuation Technique 
Significant
Unobservable Input
 Min Max 
Weighted Average(1)
  (In thousands)          
Non-Agency RMBS $4,020
 Discounted Cash Flows Yield 8.8% 25.7% 13.4%
      Projected Collateral Prepayments 32.5% 68.7% 60.5%
      Projected Collateral Losses 1.3% 9.0% 5.3%
      Projected Collateral Recoveries 3.4% 9.2% 6.4%
      Projected Collateral Scheduled Amortization 13.1% 60.1% 27.8%
            100.0%
Agency RMBS–Interest Only Securities 5,645
 Market quotes Non-Binding Third-Party Valuation $4.39
 $21.63
 $11.88
Agency RMBS–Interest Only Securities 2,113
 Option Adjusted Spread ("OAS") 
LIBOR OAS(2)
 221
 984
 576
      Projected Collateral Prepayments 52.7% 88.0% 74.1%
      Projected Collateral Scheduled Amortization 12.0% 47.3% 25.9%
            100.0%
(1)Averages are weighted based on the fair value of the related instrument.
(2)Shown in basis points.


Third-party non-binding valuations are validated by comparing such valuations to internally generated prices based on the Company's models and to recent trading activity in the same or similar instruments. For those instruments valued using discounted cash flows, collateral prepayments, losses, recoveries, and scheduled amortization are projected over the remaining life of the collateral and expressed as a percentage of the collateral's current principal balance. For those assets valued using the LIBOR Option Adjusted Spread, or "OAS," valuation methodology, cash flows are projected using the Company's models over multiple interest rate scenarios, and these projected cash flows are then discounted using the LIBOR rates implied by each interest rate scenario. The LIBOR OAS of an asset is then computed as the unique constant yield spread that, when added to all LIBOR rates in each interest rate scenario generated by the model, will equate (a) the expected present value of the projected asset cash flows over all model scenarios to (b) the actual current market price of the asset. LIBOR OAS is therefore model-dependent. Generally speaking, LIBOR OAS measures the additional yield spread over LIBOR that an asset provides at its current market price after taking into account any interest rate options embedded in the asset.
Material changes in any of the inputs above in isolation could result in a significant change to reported fair value measurements. Fair value measurements are impacted by the interrelationships of these inputs. For example, a higher expectation of collateral prepayments will generally result in a lower expectation of collateral losses. Conversely, higher losses will generally result in lower prepayments.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of all other financial instruments not included in the disclosures above as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:
  December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
(In thousands) Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value
Other financial instruments        
Assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $33,504
 $33,504
 $40,166
 $40,166
Due from brokers 49,518
 49,518
 33,297
 33,297
Reverse repurchase agreements 75,012
 75,012
 78,632
 78,632
Liabilities:        
Repurchase agreements 1,197,973
 1,197,973
 1,222,719
 1,222,719
Due to brokers 1,055
 1,055
 439
 439
Cash and cash equivalents includes cash held in an interest bearing overnight account for which fair value equals the carrying value and cash held in money market accounts which are liquid in nature and for which fair value equals the carrying value; such assets are considered Level 1 assets. Due from brokers and Due to brokers include collateral transferred to or received from counterparties, along with receivables and payables for open and/or closed derivative positions. These receivables and payables are short term in nature and any collateral transferred consists primarily of cash; fair value of these items approximates carrying value and such items are considered Level 1 assets and liabilities. The Company's repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value due to their short term nature. Repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements are classified as Level 2 assets and liabilities based on the adequacy of the collateral and their short term nature.
5. Financial Derivatives
The Company is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. Specifically, the Company's primary source of financing is repurchase agreements and the Company enters into financial derivative and other instruments to manage exposure to variable cash flows on portions of its borrowings under those repurchase agreements. Since the interest rates on repurchase agreements typically change with market interest rates such as LIBOR, the Company is exposed to constantly changing interest rates, which accordingly affects cash flows associated with the Company's borrowings. To mitigate the effect of changes in these interest rates and their related cash flows, the Company may enter into a variety of derivative contracts, including interest rate swaps, swaptions, and TBAs. Additionally, from time to time, the Company may use short positions in U.S. Treasury securities to mitigate its interest rate risk.


The following table details the fair value of the Company's holdings of financial derivatives as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:
  December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
  (In thousands)
Financial derivatives–assets, at fair value:    
TBA securities purchase contracts $96
 $115
TBA securities sale contracts 949
 302
Fixed payer interest rate swaps 4,198
 891
Fixed receiver interest rate swaps 693
 857
Futures 72
 18
Total financial derivatives–assets, at fair value 6,008
 2,183
Financial derivatives–liabilities, at fair value:    
TBA securities purchase contracts —
 (49)
TBA securities sale contracts (554) (315)
Fixed payer interest rate swaps (1,421) (4,361)
Total financial derivatives–liabilities, at fair value (1,975) (4,725)
Total $4,033
 $(2,542)
Interest Rate Swaps
The following tables provide information about the Company's fixed payer interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:
December 31, 2016:
      Weighted Average
Maturity Notional Amount Fair Value Pay Rate Receive Rate Remaining Years to Maturity
  (In thousands)      
2017 $74,750
 $(258) 1.21% 0.92% 0.59
2018 65,990
 193
 0.97
 0.89
 1.43
2019 4,200
 57
 0.96
 0.88
 2.60
2020 79,500
 554
 1.48
 0.89
 3.32
2021 19,300
 99
 1.83
 0.93
 4.92
2022 13,044
 172
 1.75
 0.89
 5.68
2023 54,200
 514
 1.93
 0.89
 6.47
2024 8,900
 87
 1.99
 0.85
 7.26
2025 15,322
 123
 2.04
 0.89
 8.13
2026 46,435
 2,306
 1.72
 0.91
 9.74
2043 12,380
 (1,070) 2.99
 0.89
 26.38
Total $394,021
 $2,777
 1.53% 0.90% 4.82


December 31, 2015:
      Weighted Average
Maturity Notional Amount Fair Value Pay Rate Receive Rate Remaining Years to Maturity
  (In thousands)      
2016 $48,000
 $(83) 0.80% 0.39% 0.77
2017 74,750
 (445) 1.21
 0.41
 1.59
2018 71,529
 80
 1.11
 0.34
 2.28
2020 119,893
 220
 1.51
 0.33
 4.36
2022 19,444
 86
 1.76
 0.34
 6.51
2023 131,400
 (1,367) 2.10
 0.38
 7.39
2024 9,200
 11
 1.99
 0.32
 8.26
2025 58,560
 (5) 2.06
 0.33
 9.32
2043 21,067
 (1,967) 3.03
 0.36
 27.39
Total $553,843
 $(3,470) 1.63% 0.36% 5.67
The following tables provide information about the Company's fixed receiver interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.
December 31, 2016:
      Weighted Average
Maturity Notional Amount Fair Value Pay Rate Receive Rate Remaining Years to Maturity
  (In thousands)      
2025 $9,700
 $693
 0.88% 3.00% 8.54
Total $9,700
 $693
 0.88% 3.00% 8.54
December 31, 2015:
      Weighted Average
Maturity Notional Amount Fair Value Pay Rate Receive Rate Remaining Years to Maturity
  (In thousands)      
2025 $9,700
 $857
 0.32% 3.00% 9.55
Total $9,700
 $857
 0.32% 3.00% 9.55
Futures
The following table provides information about the Company's short positions in futures as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.
December 31, 2016:
Description Notional Amount Fair Value Remaining Months to Expiration
($ in thousands)      
U.S. Treasury Futures $(26,700) $71
 2.70
Eurodollar Futures (9,000) 1
 5.59


December 31, 2015:
Description Notional Amount Fair Value Remaining Months to Expiration
($ in thousands)      
Eurodollar Futures $(21,000) $18
 11.70
TBAs
The Company transacts in the forward settling TBA market. Pursuant to these TBA transactions, the Company agrees to purchase or sell, for future delivery, Agency RMBS with certain principal and interest terms and certain types of underlying collateral, but the particular Agency RMBS to be delivered is not identified until shortly before the TBA settlement date. TBAs are liquid and have quoted market prices and represent the most actively traded class of MBS. The Company primarily uses TBAs to mitigate interest rate risk, typically in the form of short positions. However, from time to time the Company also invests in TBAs as a means of acquiring additional exposure to Agency RMBS, or for speculative purposes, including holding long positions. Overall, the Company typically holds a net short position.
The Company does not generally take delivery of TBAs; rather, it settles the associated receivable and payable with its trading counterparties on a net basis. Transactions with the same counterparty for the same TBA that result in a reduction of the position are treated as extinguished.
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had outstanding contracts to purchase ("long positions") and sell ("short positions") TBA securities as follows:
  December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
TBA Securities 
Notional Amount(1)
 
Cost
Basis(2)
 
Market Value(3)
 
Net Carrying Value(4)
 
Notional Amount (1)
 
Cost
Basis(2)
 
Market Value(3)
 
Net Carrying Value(4)
(In thousands)                
Purchase contracts:     
          
Assets $49,138
 $49,774
 $49,870
 $96
 $60,291
 $61,638
 $61,753
 $115
Liabilities —
 —
 —
 —
 23,418
 24,208
 24,159
 (49)
  49,138

49,774

49,870

96

83,709

85,846

85,912

66
Sale contracts:                
Assets (281,655) (298,807) (297,858) 949
 (170,800) (181,476) (181,174) 302
Liabilities (183,381) (189,694) (190,248) (554) (252,746) (268,973) (269,288) (315)
  (465,036)
(488,501)
(488,106)
395

(423,546)
(450,449)
(450,462)
(13)
Total TBA securities, net $(415,898) $(438,727) $(438,236) $491
 $(339,837) $(364,603) $(364,550) $53
(1)Notional amount represents the principal balance of the underlying Agency RMBS.
(2)Cost basis represents the forward price to be paid (received) for the underlying Agency RMBS.
(3)Market value represents the current market value of the underlying Agency RMBS (on a forward delivery basis) as of period end.
(4)Net carrying value represents the difference between the market value of the TBA contract as of period end and the cost basis and is reported in Financial derivatives-assets at fair value and Financial derivatives-liabilities at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The tables below details the average notional values of the Company's financial derivatives, using absolute value of month end notional values, for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
Derivative Type Year Ended
December 31, 2016		 Year Ended
December 31, 2015
  (In thousands)
Interest rate swaps $451,847
 $525,037
TBAs 488,075
 606,665
Interest rate swaptions —
 5,223
Futures 22,085
 5,308


Gains and losses on the Company's financial derivatives for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 are summarized in the tables below:
  Year Ended December 31, 2016
Derivative Type Net Realized Gains (Losses) on Periodic Settlements of Interest Rate Swaps Net Realized Gains (Losses) Other Than Periodic Settlements of Interest Rate Swaps Net Realized Gains (Losses) on Financial Derivatives Change in Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Accrued Periodic Settlements of Interest Rate Swaps Change in Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) Other Than on Accrued Periodic Settlements of Interest Rate Swaps Change in Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Financial Derivatives
(In thousands)            
Interest rate swaps $(4,338) $(10,418) $(14,756) $763
 $5,231
 $5,994
TBAs   1,424
 1,424
   439
 439
Futures   1,212
 1,212
   54
 54
Total $(4,338) $(7,782) $(12,120) $763
 $5,724
 $6,487
  Year Ended December 31, 2015
Derivative Type Net Realized Gains (Losses) on Periodic Settlements of Interest Rate Swaps Net Realized Gains (Losses) Other Than Periodic Settlements of Interest Rate Swaps Net Realized Gains (Losses) on Financial Derivatives Change in Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Accrued Periodic Settlements of Interest Rate Swaps Change in Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) Other Than on Accrued Periodic Settlements of Interest Rate Swaps Change in Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Financial Derivatives
(In thousands)            
Interest rate swaps $(7,027) $(8,850) $(15,877) $(350) $2,578
 $2,228
Swaptions   (500) (500)   (78) (78)
TBAs   (7,041) (7,041)   1,251
 1,251
Futures   $(14) $(14)   $18
 $18
Total $(7,027) $(16,405) $(23,432) $(350) $3,769
 $3,419
  Year Ended December 31, 2014
Derivative Type Net Realized Gains (Losses) on Periodic Settlements of Interest Rate Swaps Net Realized Gains (Losses) Other Than Periodic Settlements of Interest Rate Swaps Net Realized Gains (Losses) on Financial Derivatives Change in Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Accrued Periodic Settlements of Interest Rate Swaps Change in Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) Other Than on Accrued Periodic Settlements of Interest Rate Swaps Change in Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Financial Derivatives
(In thousands)            
Interest rate swaps $(9,217) $1,823
 $(7,394) $410
 $(36,662) $(36,252)
Swaptions   (935) (935)   163
 163
TBAs   (23,568) (23,568)   (3,433) (3,433)
Futures   19
 19
   —
 —
Total $(9,217) $(22,661) $(31,878) $410
 $(39,932) $(39,522)
As of December 31, 2016, the Company also held short positions in U.S. Treasury securities, with a principal amount of $78.6 million and a fair value of $74.2 million. As of December 31, 2015, the Company also held short positions in U.S. Treasury securities, with a principal amount of $79.6 million and a fair value of $78.4 million. Such securities are included on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet under the caption U.S. Treasury securities sold short, at fair value.
6. Borrowings under Repurchase Agreements
The Company enters into repurchase agreements. A repurchase agreement involves the sale of an asset to a counterparty together with a simultaneous agreement to repurchase the transferred asset or similar asset from such counterparty at a future date. The Company accounts for its repurchase agreements as collateralized borrowings, with the transferred assets effectively serving as collateral for the related borrowing. The Company's repurchase agreements typically range in term from 30 to 180 days. The principal economic terms of each repurchase agreement—such as loan amount, interest rate, and maturity date—are


typically negotiated on a transaction-by-transaction basis. Other terms and conditions, such as relating to events of default, are typically governed under the Company's master repurchase agreements. Absent an event of default, the Company maintains beneficial ownership of the transferred securities during the term of the repurchase agreement and receives the related principal and interest payments. Interest rates on these borrowings are generally fixed based on prevailing rates corresponding to the terms of the borrowings, and interest is paid at the termination of the repurchase agreement at which time the Company may enter into a new repurchase agreement at prevailing market rates with the same counterparty, repay that counterparty and possibly negotiate financing terms with a different counterparty, or choose to no longer finance the related asset. In response to a decline in the fair value of the transferred securities, whether as a result of changes in market conditions, security paydowns, or other factors, repurchase agreement counterparties will typically make a margin call, whereby the Company will be required to post additional securities and/or cash as collateral with the counterparty in order to re-establish the agreed-upon collateralization requirements. In the event of increases in fair value of the transferred securities, the Company generally can require the counterparty to post collateral with it in the form of cash or securities. The Company is generally permitted to sell or re-pledge any securities posted by the counterparty as collateral; however, upon termination of the repurchase agreement, or other circumstance in which the counterparty is no longer required to post such margin, the Company must return to the counterparty the same security that had been posted. The contractual amount (loan amount) of the Company's repurchase agreements approximates fair value, based on the short-term nature of the debt and the adequacy of the collateral.
At any given time, the Company seeks to have its outstanding borrowings under repurchase agreements with several different counterparties in order to reduce the exposure to any single counterparty. As of each of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had outstanding borrowings under repurchase agreements with thirteen counterparties.
The following table details the Company's outstanding borrowings under repurchase agreements as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:
  December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
    Weighted Average   Weighted Average
Remaining Days to Maturity Borrowings Outstanding Interest Rate Remaining Days to Maturity Borrowings Outstanding Interest Rate Remaining Days to Maturity
  (In thousands)          
30 days or less $545,817
 0.80% 19 $666,124
 0.52% 14
31-60 days 304,398
 0.91
 45 336,350
 0.53
 45
61-90 days 299,081
 0.98
 74 89,142
 0.70
 74
91-120 days 1,050
 0.88
 109 131,103
 0.53
 106
121-150 days 12,428
 0.97
 135 —
 —
 —
151-180 days 35,199
 1.05
 164 —
 —
 —
Total $1,197,973
 0.88% 45 $1,222,719
 0.54% 37
Repurchase agreements involving underlying investments that the Company sold prior to year end, for settlement following year end, are shown using their original maturity dates even though such repurchase agreements may be expected to be terminated early upon settlement of the sale of the underlying investment.
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the fair value of RMBS transferred as collateral under outstanding borrowings under repurchase agreements was $1.2 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively. Collateral transferred under outstanding borrowings as of December 31, 2016 includes RMBS in the amount of $33.5 million that were sold prior to year end but for which such sale had not yet settled. Collateral transferred under outstanding borrowings as of December 31, 2015 includes RMBS in the amount of $63.4 million that were sold prior to year end but for which such sale had not yet settled. In addition the Company posted net cash collateral of $42.2 million and additional securities with a fair value of $0.5 million as of December 31, 2016 as a result of margin calls from various counterparties. The Company posted net cash collateral of $20.7 million and additional securities with a fair value of $2.0 million as of December 31, 2015 as a result of margin calls from various counterparties.


Amount at risk represents the excess, if any, for each counterparty of the fair value of collateral held by such counterparty over the amounts outstanding under repurchase agreements. The following table reflects counterparties for which the amounts at risk relating to our repurchase agreements was greater than 10% of shareholders' equity as of December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2015 there were no counterparties for which the amounts at risk relating to our repurchase agreements was greater than 10% of shareholders' equity.
December 31, 2016:
Counterparty 
Amount at Risk(1)
 Weighted Average Remaining Days to Maturity Percentage of Shareholders' Equity
  (In thousands)    
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. $15,077
 58 10.6%
(1)Amounts at risk exclude, in aggregate, $0.6 million of net accrued interest, defined as accrued interest on securities held as collateral less interest payable on cash borrowed.
7. Offsetting of Assets and Liabilities
The Company records financial instruments at fair value as described in Note 2. All financial instruments are recorded on a gross basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In connection with its financial derivatives, repurchase agreements, and related trading agreements, the Company and its counterparties are required to pledge collateral. Cash or other collateral is exchanged as required with each of the Company's counterparties in connection with open derivative positions and repurchase agreements.
The following tables present information about certain assets and liabilities representing financial instruments as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. The Company has not previously entered into master netting agreements with any of its counterparties. Certain of the Company's repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements and financial derivative transactions are governed by underlying agreements that generally provide a right of offset in the event of default or in the event of a bankruptcy of either party to the transaction.
December 31, 2016:
Description 
Amount of Assets (Liabilities) Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet(1)
 
Financial Instruments Available for Offset
 
Financial Instruments Transferred or Pledged as Collateral(2)(3)
 
Cash Collateral (Received) Pledged(2)(3)
 Net Amount
(In thousands)          
Assets:          
Financial derivatives–assets $6,008
 $(1,346) $—
 $(50) $4,612
Reverse repurchase agreements 75,012
 (75,012) —
 —
 —
Liabilities:          
Financial derivatives–liabilities (1,975) 1,346
 —
 555
 (74)
Repurchase agreements (1,197,973) 75,012
 1,080,786
 42,175
 —
(1)In the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet, all balances associated with the repurchase agreements and financial derivatives are presented on a gross basis.
(2)For the purpose of this presentation, for each row the total amount of financial instruments transferred or pledged and cash collateral (received) or pledged may not exceed the applicable gross amount of assets or (liabilities) as presented here. Therefore, the Company has reduced the amount of financial instruments transferred or pledged as collateral related to the Company's repurchase agreements and cash collateral pledged on the Company's financial derivative assets and liabilities. Total financial instruments transferred or pledged as collateral on the Company's repurchase agreements as of December 31, 2016 were $1.22 billion. As of December 31, 2016 total cash collateral on financial derivative assets and liabilities excludes $4.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively of net excess cash collateral.
(3)When collateral is pledged to or pledged by a counterparty, it is often pledged or posted with respect to all positions with such counterparty, and in such cases such collateral cannot be specifically identified as relating to a specific asset or liability. As a result, in preparing the above table, the Company has made assumptions in allocating pledged or posted collateral among the various rows.


December 31, 2015:
Description 
Amount of Assets (Liabilities) Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet(1)
 
Financial Instruments Available for Offset
 
Financial Instruments Transferred or Pledged as Collateral(2)(3)
 
Cash Collateral (Received) Pledged(2)(3)
 Net Amount
(In thousands)          
Assets:          
Financial derivatives–assets $2,183
 $(1,529) $—
 $—
 $654
Reverse repurchase agreements 78,632
 (78,632) —
 —
 —
Liabilities:          
Financial derivatives–liabilities (4,725) 1,529
 —
 3,089
 (107)
Repurchase agreements (1,222,719) 78,632
 1,123,409
 20,678
 —
(1)In the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet, all balances associated with the repurchase agreements and financial derivatives are presented on a gross basis.
(2)For the purpose of this presentation, for each row the total amount of financial instruments transferred or pledged and cash collateral (received) or pledged may not exceed the applicable gross amount of assets or (liabilities) as presented here. Therefore the Company has reduced the amount of financial instruments transferred or pledged as collateral related to the Company's repurchase agreements and cash collateral pledged on the Company's financial derivative assets and liabilities. Total financial instruments transferred or pledged as collateral on the Company's repurchase agreements as of December 31, 2015 were $1.26 billion. As of December 31, 2015 total cash collateral on financial derivative assets and liabilities excludes $6.8 million and $2.5 million, respectively of net excess cash collateral.
(3)When collateral is pledged to or pledged by a counterparty, it is often pledged or posted with respect to all positions with such counterparty, and in such cases such collateral cannot be specifically identified as relating to a specific asset or liability. As a result, in preparing the above table, the Company has made assumptions in allocating pledged or posted collateral among the various rows.
8. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share, or "EPS," is calculated by dividing net income (loss) for the period by the weighted average of the Company's common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS takes into account the effect of outstanding dilutive instruments, such as share options and warrants, if any, and uses the average share price for the period in determining the number of incremental shares that are to be added to the weighted average number of shares outstanding. As of December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, the Company did not have any dilutive instruments outstanding.
The following table presents a reconciliation of the earnings/(losses) and shares used in calculating basic EPS for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014:
(In thousands except for share amounts) Year Ended
December 31, 2016		 Year Ended
December 31, 2015		 Year Ended
December 31, 2014
Numerator:      
Net income $11,906
 $30
 $16,168
Denominator:      
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding 9,121,344
 9,143,508
 9,142,736
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share $1.31
 $—
 $1.77
9. Related Party Transactions
Management Agreement
The Company is party to the Management Agreement, which provides for an initial term through September 24, 2017, and which will be renewed automatically each year thereafter for an additional one-year period, subject to certain termination rights. The Company is externally managed and advised by the Manager. Pursuant to the terms of the Management Agreement, the Manager provides the Company with its management team, including its officers, and appropriate support personnel. The Company does not have any employees. The Manager is responsible for the day-to-day operations of the Company.
The Manager receives an annual management fee in an amount equal to 1.50% per annum of shareholders' equity (as defined in the Management Agreement) as of the end of each fiscal quarter (before deductions for any management fee with respect to such fiscal period). The management fee is payable quarterly in arrears. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, the total management fee incurred was $2.1 million, $2.3 million, and $2.3 million, respectively.


Services Agreement
TheOur Manager and EMG are partiesis party to a services agreement with EMG, pursuant to which EMG is requiredprovides to provide toour Manager the Manager sufficient personnel, services, and resources as needed by our Manager to enable theour Manager to carry out its obligations and responsibilities under the Management Agreement. The Company ismanagement agreement. We are a named third-party beneficiary to the services agreement and, as a result, has,have, as a non-exclusive remedy, a direct right of action against EMG in the event of any breach by theour Manager of any of its duties, obligations or agreements under the Management Agreementmanagement agreement that arise out of or result from any breach by EMG of its obligations under the services agreement. The services agreement will terminate upon the termination of the Management Agreement.management agreement. Pursuant to the services agreement, theour Manager makes certain payments to EMG in connection with the services provided. TheOur Manager and EMG have overlapping ownership and are under common ownership and control. As a result, all management fee compensation earned by our Manager and all service agreement fees earned by EMG accrue to the common benefit of the owners of our Manager and EMG, namely EMG Holdings, L.P. and VC Investments L.L.C.
Expense ReimbursementShareholders' Agreement
UnderWe are party to a shareholders' agreement with affiliates of EMG. Pursuant to the terms of the Management Agreement,shareholders' agreement, we have agreed to cause up to two individuals designated by EMG to be nominated for election as trustees from the Company iseffective time of the shareholders' agreement until such rights expire in accordance with the agreement. The shareholders' agreement also provides that, while we are required to reimbursenominate EMG's designees for election as trustees, EMG has the Manager for operating expenses relatedexclusive right to the Company that are incurreddesignate a nominee to fill any vacancy on our Board created by the Manager, including expenses relating to legal, accounting, due diligence, other services, and all other costs and expenses. The Company's reimbursement obligation is not subject to any dollar limitation. Expensesdeath, removal or resignation of one of EMG's designees. All remaining individuals nominated for election as trustees will be reimbursednominated in cash within 60 days following delivery of the expense statement by the Manager;accordance with our bylaws in effect from time to time; provided, however, that such reimbursement may be offset by the Manager against amounts due to the Company from the Manager. The Company will not reimburse the Manager for the salaries and other compensationcomposition of the Manager's personnel except that the Company will be responsible for expenses incurred by the Manager in employing certain dedicated or partially dedicated personnel as further described below.
The Company reimburses the Manager for the allocable share of the compensation, including, without limitation, wages, salaries, and employee benefits paid or reimbursed, as approved by the Compensation Committee of theour Board of Trustees, to certain dedicated or partially dedicated personnel who spend all or a portion of their time managing the Company's affairs, based upon the percentage of time devoted by such personnel to the Company's affairs. In their capacities as officers or personnel of the Manager or its affiliates, such personnel will devote such portion of their time to the Company's affairs as is necessary to enable the Company to operate its business.
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 the Company reimbursed the Manager $1.8 million, $1.5 million, and $2.3 million, respectively, for previously incurred operating and compensation expenses.
Termination Fee
The Management Agreement requires the Company to pay a termination fee to the Manager in the event of (1) the Company's termination or non-renewal of the Management Agreement without cause or (2) the Manager's termination of the Management Agreement upon a default by the Company in the performance of any material term of the Management Agreement. Such termination fee will be equal to 5% of Shareholders' Equity, as defined in the Management Agreement as of the month-end preceding the date of the notice of termination or non-renewal of the Management Agreement.
Registration Rights Agreement
The Company is a party to a registration rights agreement with an affiliate of EMG and with the Blackstone Tactical Opportunities Funds (the "Blackstone Funds") pursuant to which the Company has granted its initial investors and each of their permitted transferees and other holders of the Company's "registrable common shares" (as such term is defined in the registration rights agreement) who become parties to the registration rights agreement with certain demand and/or piggy-back registration and shelf takedown rights.
10. Capital
The Company has authorized 500,000,000 common shares, $0.01 par value per share, and 100,000,000 preferred shares, $0.01 par value per share. The Board of Trustees may authorize the issuance of additional shares of either class. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, there were 9,130,897 and 9,135,103 common shares outstanding, respectively. No preferred shares have been issued.
During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, the Board of Directors authorized dividends totaling $1.65 per share, $2.00 per share, and $2.20 per share, respectively. Total dividends declared during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 were $15.1 million, $18.3 million, and $20.1 million, respectively.

Detailed below is a roll forward of the Company's common shares outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014:
  Year Ended
  December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014
Common Shares Outstanding
(12/31/2015, 12/31/2014, and 12/31/2013, respectively)
 9,135,103
 9,149,274
 9,139,842
Share Activity:      
Restricted shares issued 13,714
 15,390
 9,432
Shares repurchased (17,920) (29,561) —
Common Shares Outstanding
(12/31/2016, 12/31/2015, and 12/31/2014, respectively)
 9,130,897
 9,135,103
 9,149,274
Unvested restricted shares outstanding
(12/31/2016, 12/31/2015, and 12/31/2014, respectively)
 16,395
 15,390
 6,912
The below table provides details on the Company's restricted shares granted pursuant to share award agreements which are unvested at December 31, 2016:
Grant RecipientNumber of Restricted Shares GrantedGrant Date
Vesting Date(1)
Independent trustees:
9,856
September 13, 2016September 12, 2017
Partially dedicated employees:
2,302
December 13, 2016December 13, 2017
1,556
December 13, 2016December 13, 2018
2,359
December 15, 2015December 15, 2017
322
December 15, 2015December 31, 2017
(1)Date at which such restricted shares will vest and become non-forfeitable.
As of December 31, 2016, there were 229,001 shares available for future issuance under the Company's 2013 Equity Incentive Plan.
On August 13, 2013, the Company's Board of Trustees approved the adoption of a $10 million share repurchase program. The program, which is open-ended in duration, allows the Company to make repurchases from time to time on the open market or in negotiated transactions, including through Rule 10b5-1 plans. Repurchases are at the Company's discretion, subject to applicable law, share availability, price and the Company's financial performance, among other considerations. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company purchased 17,920 common shares at an aggregate cost of $0.2 million, and an average price per share of $10.94. From inception of the share repurchase program through December 31, 2016, the Company has purchased 47,481 common shares at an aggregate cost of $0.6 million, and an average price per share of $12.03.
Distribution Policy
The timing and frequency of distributions will be determined by the Board of Trustees based upon a variety of factors deemed relevant by the Company's trustees, including restrictions under applicable law, capitalcommittee thereof must satisfy all listing requirements of the NYSE or such other national exchange on which our Common Shares are then listed. Pursuant to the shareholders' agreement, EMG's right to designate trustee nominees will expire upon the termination of our Manager (or any of its affiliates) as external manager of our Company. Finally, the shareholders' agreement may only be amended with the approval of a majority of the independent trustees of our Board.
Compensation of Trustees
Our non-independent trustees do not receive compensation for serving on our Board. For information regarding the compensation of our independent trustees, see "Item 11. Executive Compensation" above.
Indemnification Agreements
We have entered into indemnification agreements with our trustees and executive officers that obligate us to indemnify them to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law and pay such persons' expenses in defending any civil or criminal proceedings in advance of final disposition of such proceeding.
22

Trustee Independence
Our Board has determined that four of our six current trustees are independent trustees as defined by the requirements of the NYSE and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Our Board has adopted, through its approval of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the categorical standards prescribed by the NYSE to assist the Board in evaluating the independence of each of our trustees. The categorical standards describe various types of relationships that could potentially exist between a board member and our Company and sets thresholds at which such relationships would be deemed to be material. Provided that no relationship or transaction exists that would disqualify a trustee under the categorical standards and our Board determines, after taking into account all facts and circumstances, that no other material relationship between our Company and the REIT requirementstrustee exists of a type not specifically mentioned in the categorical standards, our Board will deem such person to be independent. A trustee shall not be independent if he or she satisfies any one or more of the Code. Distributions to shareholders generally will be taxablefollowing criteria:
1.A trustee who is, or who has been within the last three years, an employee of our Company or any of its affiliates, or whose immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, an executive officer of our Company or any of its affiliates.
2.A trustee who has received or who has an immediate family member, serving as ordinary income, althoughan executive officer, who has received, during any twelve-month period within the last three years, more than $120,000 in direct compensation from our Company (excluding trustee and committee fees, and pension/other forms of deferred compensation for prior service that is not contingent in any way on continued service).
3.(A) A trustee who is or whose immediate family member is a portioncurrent partner of a firm that is our internal or external auditor; (B) a trustee who is a current employee of such distributions may be designateda firm; (C) a trustee who has an immediate family member who is a current employee of such a firm and who personally works on our audit; or (D) a trustee who was or whose immediate family member was within the last three years (but is no longer) a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on our audit within that time.
4.A trustee who is or has been within the last three years, or whose immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, employed as long-term capital gainan executive officer of another company where any of our present executives at the same time serves or qualified dividend income,served on that company's compensation committee.
5.A trustee who is a current employee, or may constitutewhose immediate family member is a returncurrent executive officer, of capital. The Company will furnish annuallya company that has made payments to, each shareholder a statement setting forth distributions paid or deemed paid during the preceding year and their U.S. federal income tax treatment.
It is the intentionreceived payments from, us for property or services in an amount which, in any of the Company to distribute at least 100%last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of its taxable income, after application$1 million or 2% of available tax attributes, within the time limits prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code, which may extend into the subsequent taxable year.
11. Commitments and Contingencies
From time to time, the Company may become involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company provides current directors and officers with a limited indemnification against liabilities arising in connection with the performance of their duties to the Company.

In the normal course of business the Company may also enter into contracts that contain a variety of representations, warranties, and general indemnifications. The Company's maximum exposure under these arrangements, including future claims that may be made against the Company that have not yet occurred, is unknown. The Company has not incurred any costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements. The Company has no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 and management is not aware of any significant contingencies at December 31, 2016.
12. Condensed Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Detailed below is unaudited quarterly informationsuch other company's consolidated gross revenues (as reported for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.last completed fiscal year).
(In thousands except for per share amounts) Three Month Period Ended March 31, 2016 Three Month Period Ended June 30, 2016 Three Month Period Ended September 30, 2016 
Three Month
Period Ended
December 31, 2016
INTEREST INCOME (EXPENSE)        
Interest income $9,651
 $7,538
 $7,096
 $9,213
Interest expense (2,051) (2,260) (2,279) (2,684)
Total net interest income 7,600
 5,278
 4,817
 6,529
EXPENSES        
Management fees 528
 528
 539
 534
Professional fees 218
 161
 171
 118
Compensation expense 151
 169
 142
 137
Other operating expenses 454
 414
 402
 343
Total expenses 1,351
 1,272
 1,254
 1,132
OTHER INCOME (LOSS)        
Net realized gains (losses) on securities and financial derivatives (986) (11,507) (28) 8,821
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on securities and financial derivatives (5,502) 11,008
 3,091
 (12,206)
Total other income (loss) (6,488) (499) 3,063
 (3,385)
NET INCOME (LOSS) $(239) $3,507
 $6,626
 $2,012
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:        
Basic and Diluted (1)
 $(0.03) $0.38
 $0.73
 $0.22
CASH DIVIDENDS PER COMMON SHARE:        
Dividends declared $0.45
 $0.40
 $0.40
 $0.40
(1)For the year ended December 31, 2016 the sum of EPS for the four quarters of the year does not equal EPS as calculated for the entire year (see Note 8) as a result of changes in shares during the year due to restricted share issuances and common share repurchases, as EPS is calculated using average shares outstanding during the period.

(In thousands except for per share amounts) Three Month Period Ended March 31, 2015 Three Month Period Ended June 30, 2015 Three Month Period Ended September 30, 2015 
Three Month
Period Ended
December 31, 2015
INTEREST INCOME (EXPENSE)        
Interest income $10,280
 $9,841
 $11,315
 $9,315
Interest expense (1,258) (1,520) (1,642) (1,816)
Total net interest income 9,022
 8,321
 9,673
 7,499
EXPENSES        
Management fees 610
 592
 557
 545
Professional fees 143
 135
 144
 152
Compensation expense 193
 173
 168
 87
Other operating expenses 470
 365
 406
 405
Total expenses 1,416
 1,265
 1,275
 1,189
OTHER INCOME (LOSS)        
Net realized gains (losses) on securities and financial derivatives (2,021) (2,400) (2,656) (6,778)
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on securities and financial derivatives (1,908) (4,466) (10,559) 1,448
Total other income (loss) (3,929) (6,866) (13,215) (5,330)
NET INCOME (LOSS) $3,677
 $190
 $(4,817) $980
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:        
Basic and Diluted $0.40
 $0.02
 $(0.53) $0.11
CASH DIVIDENDS PER COMMON SHARE:        
Dividends declared $0.55
 $0.55
 $0.45
 $0.45
13. Subsequent Events
On March 6, 2017 the Company's Board of Trustees approved a dividend for the first quarter of 2017 in the amount of $0.40 per share payable on April 25, 2017 to shareholders of record as of March 31, 2017.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicatedPursuant to our management as appropriateCorporate Governance Guidelines, our Board also considers a trustee's charitable relationships in determining independence. A trustee who is an officer, director, or trustee of a charitable or non-profit organization will not be considered to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2016. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2016.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three month period ended December 31, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act). Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in

accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of assets that could have a material effectrelationship with our Company that impairs the trustee's independence so long as our contributions to the entity in any single fiscal year (excluding amounts contributed by our Company under its employee matching gift program) are less than $100,000 or 2% of such entity's consolidated gross revenues (whichever is greater). Our Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on our financial statements.website at www.earnreit.com under the "For Investors—Corporate Governance" section of the website. Information at or connected to our website is not and should not be considered a part of this Amendment or the Original Filing.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, orUnder these criteria, our Board has determined that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision and with the participationfollowing members of our management, includingBoard are independent: Robert B. Allardice, III, David J. Miller, Mary McBride, and Ronald I. Simon, Ph.D.
Executive Sessions of Our Independent Trustees
In accordance with NYSE requirements and our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluatedCorporate Governance Guidelines, the effectivenessindependent trustees of our internal controlBoard meet in executive session at least quarterly, without management present. Generally, these executive sessions follow a regularly scheduled quarterly meeting of our Board. In 2023, the independent trustees of our Board met in executive session four times without management. Our Chairman typically presides over financial reporting using the criteria set forth in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by thesuch executive sessions of our independent trustees.
23

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The Audit Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on our assessment and those criteria, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effectivehas appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, or "PwC," as of December 31, 2016.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control overto audit the financial reporting. Because westatements of our Company and its subsidiaries for the year ending December 31, 2024.
PwC has advised the Audit Committee that they are an "emerging growth company" underindependent accounting firm with respect to our Company and its subsidiaries within the meaning of standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, or the "AICPA," the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or the "PCAOB," the Independence Standards Board and federal securities laws, management's report was not subjectlaws.
PwC's 2023 and 2022 Fees
PwC's fees for professional services rendered in or provided for 2023 and 2022, as applicable, were:
20232022
Audit Fees$477,500 $460,807 
Audit-related Fees76,500 51,500 
Tax Fees— — 
All Other Fees1,641 1,506 
Total Fees$555,641 $513,813 
Audit Fees—Audit fees consist of fees billed by PwC related to the audit of our consolidated financial statements. Audit fees are those billed or expected to be billed for audit services related to each fiscal year.
Audit-related Fees—Audit-related fees consist of fees billed or expected to be billed by PwC for other audit and attest services, financial accounting, reporting and compliance matters, risk and control reviews, and the issuance of comfort letters and SEC consents and certain agreed upon procedures and other attestation reports including fees for such services provided in connection with our public offerings. Fees for audit-related services are for those services rendered during each fiscal year.
Tax Fees—Tax fees consist of fees billed or expected to be billed by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to an exemption under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Item 9B. Other Information
ITRA Disclosure
Pursuant to Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act, ifPwC for tax compliance, advisory and planning services rendered during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, we or anyyear.
All Other Fees—All other fees mostly consist of our affiliates had engaged incosts associated with certain transactions with Iran or with persons or entities designated under certain executive orders, we would be required to disclose information regarding such transactions in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as required under Section 219online subscription services.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
On at least an annual basis, the Audit Committee pre-approves a list of the Iran Threat Reductionservices and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 ("ITRA"). During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, we did not engage in any transactions with Iran or with persons or entities related to Iran.
Blackstone Tactical Opportunities EARN Holdings L.L.C., an affiliate of The Blackstone Group L.P. ("Blackstone"), is a holder of approximately 29% of the outstanding equity interests of our Common Shares and has a representative on our Board of Trustees. Accordingly, Blackstone may be deemed an "affiliate" of us, as that term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2. Blackstone incorporated by reference in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 disclosures pursuant to ITRA regarding its portfolio companiessets pre-approval fee levels that may be deemedprovided by PwC without obtaining engagement specific pre-approval from the Audit Committee. The pre-approved list of services consists of audit services, audit-related services, tax services and all other services. All requests or applications for PwC audit services, audit-related services, tax services, or all other services must be submitted to our Chief Financial Officer to determine if the services are included within the pre-approved list of services that have received Audit Committee pre-approval. Any type of service that is not included on the pre-approved list of services must be specifically approved by the Audit Committee or its designee. Any proposed service that is included on the list of pre-approved services but will cause the pre-approved fee level to be affiliates of Blackstone. Becauseexceeded will also require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee or its designee. The Audit Committee has chosen the Audit Committee Chairman as its designee.
All of the broad definition of "affiliate"services rendered by and fees paid to PwC in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2, these portfolio companies of Blackstone, through Blackstone's ownership of us, may also be deemed to be affiliates of ours.
We have reproduced below the disclosures of Travelport Limited and NCR Corporation, as provided in Blackstone's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 and the quarter ended June 30, 2016, respectively. Travelport Limited and NCR corporation may be considered affiliates of Blackstone. Neither Travelport Limited nor NCR Corporation has provided us with gross revenues and net profits attributable to the activities described below. We have no involvement in or control over the activities of Travelport Limited or NCR Corporation, any of their predecessor companies or any of their subsidiaries, and we have not independently verified or participated in the preparation of the below disclosure by these entities.
Travelport Limited
"As part of our global business in the travel industry, we provide certain passenger travel related Travel Commerce Platform and Technology Services to Iran Air. We also provide certain airline Technology Services to Iran Air Tours. All of these services are either exempt from applicable sanctions prohibitions pursuant to a statutory exemption permitting transactions ordinarily incident to travel or, to the extent not otherwise exempt, specifically licensed2023 were pre-approved by the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control. Subject to any changesAudit Committee, and there were no services for which the de minimis exception permitted in the exempt/licensed status of such activities, we intend to continue these business activities, which are directly related to and promote the arrangement of travel for individuals.certain circumstances under SEC rules was utilized.
NCR Corporation
24
"Pursuant to Section 13(r)(1)(D)(iii) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we note that, during the period from January 1, 2016 through March 31, 2016, we maintained a bank account and guarantees at the Commercial Bank of Syria ("CBS"), which was designated as a Specially Designated National pursuant to Executive Order 13382 ("EO 13382") on


August 10, 2011. This bank account and the guarantees at CBS were maintained in the normal course of business prior to the listing of CBS pursuant to EO 13382. We note that the last known account balance as of March 31, 2016, was approximately $3,468. The bank account did not generate interest from January 1, 2016 through March 31, 2016, and the guarantees did not generate any revenue or profits for the Company. Pursuant to a license granted to the Company by OFAC on January 3, 2013, and subsequent licenses granted on April 29, 2013, July 12, 2013, February 28, 2014, November 12, 2014, and October 24, 2015, the Company has been winding down its past operations in Syria. The Company's current license expires on April 30, 2016. The Company has also received licenses from OFAC to close the CBS account and terminate any guarantees. The Company's application to renew the license to transact business with CBS, which was submitted to OFAC on May 18, 2015, remains pending. Following the termination of guarantees and the closure of the account, the Company does not intend to engage in any further business activities with CBS."
"Pursuant to Section 13(r)(1)(D)(iii) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we note that, during the period from April 1, 2016 through April 30, 2016, we continued to maintain a bank account and guarantees at the Commercial Bank of Syria ("CBS"), which was designated as a Specially Designated National pursuant to Executive Order 13382 ("EO 13382") on August 10, 2011. This bank account and the guarantees at CBS were maintained in the normal course of business prior to the listing of CBS pursuant to EO 13382. We note that the last known account balance as of April 30, 2016 was approximately $3,468. The bank account did not generate interest from April 1, 2016 through April 30, 2016, and the guarantees did not generate any revenue or profits for the Company. Pursuant to a license granted to the Company by OFAC on January 3, 2013, and subsequent licenses granted on April 29, 2013, July 12, 2013, February 28, 2014, November 12, 2014, and October 24, 2015, the Company had been engaged in winding down its past operations in Syria. The Company's last such license expired on April 30, 2016. In addition, the Company's application to renew its license to transact business with CBS, which was submitted to OFAC on May 18, 2015, was not acted upon prior to the expiration of the Company's last such license. As a result, and in connection with the license expiration, the Company abandoned its remaining property in Syria, which, including the CBS account, was commercially insignificant, and ended the employment of its final two employees in Syria, who had remained employed by the Company to assist with the execution of the Company's wind-down activities pursuant to authority granted by the OFAC licenses. The Company does not intend to engage in any further business activities with CBS."

PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by Item 10 is incorporated by reference to information to be included in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2017 annual shareholders' meeting.
Our Board of Trustees has established a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our officers and trustees and to our Manager's and certain of its affiliates' officers, directors and employees when such individuals are acting for us or on our behalf which is available on our website at www.earnreit.com. Any waiver of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics of our executive officers or trustees may be made only by our Board of Trustees or one of its committees.
We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K relating to amendments to or waivers from any provision of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions and that relates to any element of the code of ethics definition enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K by posting such information on our website at www.earnreit.com under the, "For Our Shareholders-Corporate Governance" section of the website.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by Item 11 is incorporated by reference to information to be included in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2017 annual shareholders' meeting.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters
The information required by Item 12 is incorporated by reference to information to be included in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2017 annual shareholders' meeting.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by Item 13 is incorporated by reference to information to be included in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2017 annual shareholders' meeting.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by Item 14 is incorporated by reference to information to be included in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2017 annual shareholders' meeting.

PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Documents filed as part of this report:
1. Financial Statements.
See Index to consolidated financial statements, included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
2. Schedules to Financial Statements:
All financial statement schedules not included have been omitted because they are either inapplicable or the information required is provided in our Financial Statements and Notes thereto, included in Part II, Item 8, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Exhibits
ExhibitDescription
3.1
ExhibitDescription
3.1
3.2
4.1
4.2
10.1
10.1+Fourth
10.2+
10.3+
10.3+
10.4+
10.4+10.5+
10.5+10.6+
10.610.7+
10.8+
10.7
10.9+
10.810.10+
10.910.11
10.1010.12
12.1Statement re: Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
21.1
23.1
25

ExhibitDescription
24.1Power of Attorney (included on signature page)(Continued)
31.1
31.1
31.2

32.1*
32.1*
32.2*
101The following financial information from Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT's Annual Report (incorporated by reference to Exhibit to 32.2 of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for((File No. 001-35986), filed on March 12, 2024).
97.1+
101.INSInline XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheet, (ii) Consolidated Statement of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Instance Document
101.SCHInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CALInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEFInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LABInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PREInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
104Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document)
*
*    Furnished herewith. These certifications are not deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
+Compensatory plan or arrangement.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary+    Management or compensatory plan or arrangement.
None.
26


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

ELLINGTON RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE REIT
Date:March 13, 2017April 12, 2024By:
/s/ LAURENCEPENN
Laurence Penn

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, the undersigned officers and trustees of Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT, hereby severally constitute Laurence Penn, Daniel Margolis, Jason Frank and Lisa Mumford, and each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys with full power to them, and each of them singly, to sign for us and in our names in the capacities indicated below, the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed herewith and any and all amendments to said Annual Report on Form 10-K, and generally to do all such things in our names and in our capacities as officers and trustees to enable Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT to comply with the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and all requirements of the SEC, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by our said attorneys, or any of them, to said Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and all amendments thereto.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and dates indicated.
27
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ LAURENCEPENN
Chief Executive Officer, President and Trustee (Principal Executive Officer)
March 13, 2017
LAURENCEPENN
/s/ LISA MUMFORD
Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
March 13, 2017
LISA MUMFORD
/s/ MICHAEL W. VRANOS
TrusteeMarch 13, 2017
MICHAEL W. VRANOS
/s/ THOMAS F. ROBARDS
Chairman of the BoardMarch 13, 2017
THOMAS F. ROBARDS
/s/ RONALD I. SIMON PH.D
TrusteeMarch 13, 2017
RONALD I. SIMON PH.D
/s/ ROBERT B. ALLARDICE, III
TrusteeMarch 13, 2017
ROBERT B. ALLARDICE, III
/s/ MENES O. CHEE
TrusteeMarch 13, 2017
MENES O. CHEE
/s/ DAVID MILLER
TrusteeMarch 13, 2017
DAVID MILLER

EXHIBIT INDEX
ExhibitDescription
3.1Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT filed on May 3, 2013 (incorporated by reference to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013).
3.2Amended and Restated Bylaws of Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT (incorporated by reference to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013).
4.1Specimen Common Share Certificate of Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT (incorporated by reference to the registration statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-187662), filed on April 23, 2013).
10.1Fourth Amended and Restated Management Agreement between Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT and Ellington Residential Mortgage Management LLC (incorporated by reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 5, 2015).
10.2+2013 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the registration statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-187662), filed on April 23, 2013).
10.3+Form of Share Award Agreement (for trustees) (incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 25, 2013).
10.4+Form of Share Award Agreement (for trustees) (incorporated by reference to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014).
10.5+Form of Share Award Agreement (for Ellington employees) (incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 18, 2015).
10.6Form of Share Award Agreement (for Ellington employees)
10.7Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to the registration statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-187662), filed on April 29, 2013).
10.8Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of September 24, 2012, by and among Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT, EMG Holdings, L.P. and Blackstone Tactical Opportunities EARN Holdings, L.L.C.(incorporated by reference to the registration statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-187662), filed on April 23, 2013).
10.9Shareholders Agreement by and among Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT, EMG Holdings, L.P., and Blackstone Tactical Opportunities EARN Holdings, L.L.C. dated May 6, 2013 (incorporated by reference to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013).
10.10Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Ellington Residential Mortgage LP (incorporated by reference to the registration statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-187662), filed on April 23, 2013).
12.1Statement re: Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
21.1List of Subsidiaries
23.1Consent of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
24.1Power of Attorney (included on signature page)
31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002
31.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002
32.1*Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002
32.2*Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002
101The following financial information from Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheet, (ii) Consolidated Statement of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
*Furnished herewith. These certifications are not deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
+Compensatory plan or arrangement.

111