UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

_________________________________________________________________
FORM 10-K

(Mark One)
☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO

SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended September 29, 2017                          October 2, 2020
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____ to ____

Commission File No. 1-7463

_________________________________________________________________
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

Delaware

95-4081636

Delaware

95-4081636
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation

or organization)

(IRS Employer


identification number

number)

1999 Bryan Street

Suite 1200

Dallas, Texas 75201

Dallas

(214) 583-8500

Texas
75201

(Address of principal executive offices

offices)

Telephone number (including area code)

(Zip Code)


(214) 583 – 8500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

_________________________________________________________________

Title of Each Class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock $1

$1 par value

J

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

_________________________________________________________________
Indicate by check-mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act:      Yes      No

Indicate by check-mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.      Yes      No

Indicate by check-mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.      Yes      No

Indicate by check-mark whether the Registrant: has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).      Yes      No

Indicate by check-mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  

Indicate by check-mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.        



Indicate by check-mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act)      Yes      No

There were 120,466,122were 129,623,428 shares of common stock outstanding as of November 10, 2017.12, 2020. The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s common equity held by non-affiliatesnon-affiliates was approximately $6.7$9.6 billion as of March 31, 2017,27, 2020, based upon the last reported sales price on the New York Stock Exchange on that date.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be issued in connection with its 20182021 annual meeting of shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K where indicated.




JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.

Fiscal 20172020 Annual Report on Form 10-K

Table of Contents

Item

Page No.

Item

Page No.

Item 1.

Page 3

4

Item 1A.

Page 15

28

Item 1B.

Page 34

52

Item 2.

Page 34

52

Item 3.

Page 34

52

Item 4.

Page 34

52

Item 5.

Page 35

53

Item 6.

Page 37

55

Item 7.

Page 38

56

Item 7A.

Page 57

76

Item 8.

Page 57

77

Item 9.

Page 57

77

Item 9A.

Page 57

77

Item 9B.

Page 58

78

Item 10.

Page 59

79

Item 11.

Page 59

79

Item 12.

Page 59

79

Item 13.

Page 60

79

Item 14.

Page 60

79

Item 15.

Page 61

80

Page 66

83


Page 2


PART


PART I

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

In addition to historical information, this Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.1995, including, among other things, statements regarding our future operations, financial condition, and business strategies and future economic and industry conditions. Forward-looking statements are statements that do not directly relate to any historical or current fact. When used herein, words such as "expects," "anticipates," "believes," "seeks," "estimates," "plans," "intends," “future,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “can,” “may,” and similar words are intended to identify forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Although such statements are based on management’s current estimates and expectations and/or currently available competitive, financial, and economic data, forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from what may be inferred from the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those listed and discussed in Item 1A— Risk Factors below. We undertake no obligation to release publicly any revisions or updates to any forward-looking statements. We encourage you to read carefully the risk factors described herein and in other documents we file from time to time with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC").

Unless the context otherwise requires, all references herein to "Jacobs" or the "Registrant" are to Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and its predecessors, and references to the "Company", "we", "us" or "our" are to Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Item 1.

BUSINESS


General Background Information


Page 3


Item 1.     BUSINESS
At Jacobs, we’re challenging today to reinvent tomorrow by solving the world’s most critical problems for thriving cities, resilient environments, mission-critical outcomes, operational advancement, scientific discovery and cutting-edge manufacturing, turning abstract ideas into realities that transform the world for good. Leveraging a talent force of more than 55,000, Jacobs provides a full spectrum of professional services including consulting, technical, scientific and project delivery for the government and private sector.
Our deep global domain knowledge - applied together with the latest advances in technology - are why customers large and small choose to partner with Jacobs. We operate in two lines of business: Critical Mission Solutions and People & Places Solutions.
After spending three years transforming our portfolio and setting the foundation to get us where we are onetoday, we launched a three-year accelerated profitable growth strategy at our Investor Day in February 2019, focused on innovation and continued transformation to build upon our position as the leading solutions provider for our clients. This transformation included the $3.2 billion acquisition of CH2M Hill Companies, Ltd ("CH2M") and the $3.4 billion divestiture of the largest technical professionalCompany's energy, chemicals and resources business. The alignment of revenue synergies was key to the successful integration of CH2M and created a model for successful follow-on integrations like The KeyW Holding Corporation and John Wood Group’s nuclear business. These acquisitions further position us as a leader in high-value government services firmsand technology-enabled solutions, enhancing our portfolio by adding intellectual property-driven technology with unique proprietary C5ISR (command, control, communications, computer, combat systems, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance) rapid solutions, and amplifying Jacobs’ position as a Tier-1 global nuclear services provider.
We have turned the course of Jacobs’ future and are now focused on broadening our leadership in the world.sustainable, high growth sectors. As part of our strategy, our new brand was created from an understanding of where we’ve been, what’s true to our culture and our strategy going forward. We provide a diverse range of technical, professional,articulate our bold creativity in our brand promise: Challenging today. Reinventing tomorrow. Signaling our transition from an engineering and construction servicescompany to a large number of industrial, commercial,global technology-forward solutions company, we began trading as “J” on the New York Stock Exchange in December 2019. Our Transformation Office is charged with driving further innovation, delivering value-creating solutions for our clients and governmental clients.

We focusleveraging an integrated digital and technology strategy to improve our services on clients operatingefficiency and effectiveness, ultimately freeing up valuable time and resources for reinvestment in the following sectors:

our people.
Revenue by Type (Fiscal Year 2020)
jec-20201002_g1.jpg

Oil and gas exploration, production, and refining;

Page 4


Chemicals and polymers;

Programs for various national governments, including aerospace, defense, and environmental programs;

Buildings (including specialized buildings for clients operating in the fields of healthcare, education, and high technology; governmental complexes; other specialized civic and mission critical buildings, installations, and laboratories; and retail and commercial buildings);

Infrastructure and telecommunications;

Mining and minerals;

Pharmaceuticals and biotechnology;

Power;

Pulp and paper;

Technology and manufacturing;Consulting includes cybersecurity, data analytics, systems and

Food software application integration services and consumer products, among others.

Jacobs was founded in 1947consulting, enterprise and incorporated as a Delaware corporation in 1987.  We are headquartered in Dallas, Texas, USA,mission IT services, engineering and provide ourdesign, nuclear services, through more than 200 offices located around the globe in North America, South America, Europe, the Middle East, India, Australia, Africa, and Asia.

How We Operate

As a broad-based technical professional services firm, we offer a range of services to help our clients maintain a competitive edge in their respective markets. From consulting and feasibility studies to design, to engineering, to construction, to start-up and commissioning, and then toenterprise level operations and maintenance and other highly technical consulting solutions within Critical Mission Solutions (CMS) and data analytics, artificial intelligence and automation, software development as well as digitally-driven consulting, planning and architecture, program management and other highly technical consulting solutions within People & Places Solutions (P&PS).

Project Delivery Services includes management and execution of wind-tunnel design-build projects in CMS and progressive design-build for water and construction management for our Advanced Facilities business in P&PS. We believe these services are lower risk than typical lump-sum type construction contracting.
Pass-through Revenue includes P&PS procurement activities and revenue where we customizeare acting as principal for subcontract labor or third-party materials and equipment and are consequently reflected in both revenues and costs.
Page 5


Challenging today. Reinventing tomorrow
Our values continue to guide our services to meet

Page 3


businessbehaviors, relationships and project goals. Our global network of professionals works with a multi-office approach in an effort to provide clients with the best, most economical project or program solutions.

We strive to provide client value through continuous improvement in our performance. We regularly monitor our clients' expectations, our project delivery protocols and system, and our operational performance. Tools such as our Jacobs Value Enhancing Practices, Global Standard Operating Procedures, project reviews, the Jacobs System to Ensure Project Success ("JSTEPS") and Safe Plans of Action ("SPAs") provide added value to our clients' projects. They also allowoutcomes - allowing us to create performance improvement actions during the project execution. Through continuous improvement, with our tools and our processes, we believe we can offer our clients superior value when they do business with us.

JacobsValue+ SM ("Value Plus") is an internal tool we use to document and quantify the actual value or savings we provide to our clients and their projects. Some of the benefits achieved through the Value Plus program include lower total installed costs, shorter schedules, and reduced life cycle costs. Value Plus is implemented at project initiation: a project goal is created, and cost-saving ideas are entered into the Value Plus database. When the Value Plus cycle is complete, the project team and client identify and agree on the unique cost and/or schedule reductions for the project.

The Company’s Strategy

Our strategy is based on three key priorities:

Build a High Performance Culture – Reinforce a culture of accountability, inspirational leadership and innovation that will drive long-term outperformance;

Transform the Core – Fundamentally change the way we operate to improve project delivery, sales effectiveness and business excellence; and

Grow Profitably – Execute a balanced strategy focused on organic growth, M&A and active portfolio management to drive profitable growth in the most attractive sectors and geographies.

Employees and Safety

Our employees are our most important and valuable asset and, therefore, the prevention of job-related injuries is given top priority. It is the policy of the Company to provide and maintain a safe and healthy working environment and to follow operating practices that safeguard all employees and result in a more efficient operation.  BeyondZero®, the name of our program that promotes our culture of caring, moves beyond efforts to have an incident and injury-free safety performance. We implement a culture of caring where concern for employees' health, safety, and welfare extends outside the office walls, beyond the project site fences and into their homes, cars, and all the places where they interact with family, friends, and fellow employees.  We have commenced a mental health program which aims to promote positive mental health across our Company.

Since Jacobs’ founding, the Company has been based on doing business honestly, ethically, and with the utmost integrity. Our culture, and our Code of Conduct which all employees are required to sign annually, prescribe that everyone at the Company must adhere to Jacobs’ values and ethical code, and comply with the laws that govern the Company’s activities worldwide. Our employees and business partners are expected to follow the highest principles of business conduct, integrity, and ethics as they carry out their responsibilities, and are guided by the following principles in carrying out their responsibilities: loyalty, compliance with applicable laws, observance of ethical standards, avoidance of conflicts of interest, and communication. We endeavor to deal fairly with our employees, customers, suppliers, and competitors, and to respect the policies and procedures of those outside the Company.

We strive to present a clear and consistent image of our Company to our clients, employees, shareholders, and business partners, regarding how we behave, how we communicate, how we look, and most importantly, how our promises to our clients are delivered, anywhere in the world.

Page 4


We accomplish this foremost through our vision, mission and values, which allow us to behaveact as one company and unify us worldwide. By keeping our values as a central focus of our Company, we are able to think the same way and arrive at similar conclusions, regardless of our physical location. With respect to our values:

Our values stand on a foundation of safety and integrity;

People are the heart of our business;

Clients are our valued partners;

Performance excellence is our commitment; and

Profitable growth is an imperative.

Our Vision statement “solutions for a more connected sustainable world” underpins our commitment to sustainability. Plan Beyond is how we define and identifyworldwide when interacting with our approach to sustainability. Building on BeyondZeroclients, employees, communities and shareholders.

We do things right. We always act with integrity - taking responsibility for our culture ofwork, caring Plan Beyond helps us to focus on looking beyond our company and how we contribute as a global corporate citizen. Our sustainability activities encompass Jacobs stakeholders at Jacobs including our clients,for our people and widerstaying focused on safety and sustainability. We make investments in our clients, people and communities, so we can grow together.
We challenge the accepted. We know that to create a better future, we must ask the difficult questions. We always stay curious and are not afraid to try new things.
We aim higher. We do not settle - always looking beyond to raise the bar and deliver with excellence. We are committed to our supply chain partners and our investors.  

Through planning beyond compliance our people are empowered to explore, to innovate, and to developclients by bringing innovative solutions that help our clients deliver their sustainable goals. lead to profitable growth and shared success.

We have the experience and competency to assist our clients with the challenges of climate change, resilience of cities and infrastructure, efficient and sustainable procurement, resource reuse and recycling, water resource management, energy source management and environmental protection and enhancement.  

As our company values espouse,live inclusion. We put people areat the heart of our business. ItWe have an unparalleled focus on inclusion, with a diverse team of visionaries, thinkers and doers. We embrace all perspectives, collaborating to make a positive impact.

Our three-pillar strategy is based on the foundation of these values, as we drive to become the employer of choice, deliver connected and sustainable solutions, and leverage technology-enabled execution.
jec-20201002_g2.jpg
Page 6



We do things right
We always act with integrity - taking responsibility for our work, caring for our people and staying focused on safety and sustainability. We make investments in our clients, people and communities, so we can grow together.
From the way we operate our business, to the work we perform with clients and other organizations, we continue to look at ways we can make a positive environmental, societal and economic difference for our people, businesses, governments and communities around the world.
As we face some of the world’s toughest challenges, including clean water, affordable energy, connectivity, resilient environments, climate change, environmental pollution and economic growth, our people are discovering better ways to create an enduring legacy.
jec-20201002_g3.jpg
PlanBeyondSM is our approach to sustainability - planning beyond today for a more sustainable future for everyone. For us, this means social and economic progress while protecting our environment and improving resilience.
jec-20201002_g4.jpg

Leadership on climate change and social value
In April 2020, we published our first company Climate Action Plan committing to 100% renewable energy for our operations in 20201, net zero carbon for our operations and business travel in 2020, and being carbon negative for our operations and business travel by 2030. We will achieve net zero carbon in line with global standard PAS 2060:2014.
Our ESG Disclosures Report provides supplementary information regarding our Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) performance, organized according to the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) framework.








1 Jacobs has achieved its 2020 Climate Action Plan commitments: carbon neutral status and 100% renewable electricity.
Page 7


Our partnership with Simetrica (a U.K.-based organization that specializes in social value measurement and wellbeing analysis) enables us to help clients understand how they can transform local, city and regional decision-making – identifying innovative, inclusive and ethical investments that will drive social change, spread prosperity and meet the growing challenges facing communities. In collaboration with Simetrica-Jacobs, we released a thought leadership paper titled Before & Beyond the Build: A blueprint for creating social value through infrastructure investments. The paper explores how infrastructure investments can contribute to addressing critical societal issues and how infrastructure could be planned, delivered/built and operated to generate enduring social value at scale and help overcome entrenched social issues in our communities.
Developing our talent … a world where you can
We put the spotlight on ensuring that Jacobs is an employer of choice in every way: we aspire to be a merit-based organization that is inclusive and diverse; we take on the responsibility to continually recruit and develop the best talent.
We are building an inclusive and diverse culture to provide a solid foundation for selecting, developing and retaining the best and brightest minds at Jacobs. Our eight Jacobs Employee Networks (JENs) play a critical role in attracting new talent into our business, helping to shape our recruiting strategies and policies, our science, technology, engineering,
arts and math (STEAM) programs, and our accessibility practices, including our Disability Employment Action Plan. Our global STEAM Ambassador network helps us build partnerships with schools and other educational organizations and form lasting relationships that inspire the next generation and sustain our business.
Our global career program "e3: engage. excel. elevate." is our unique approach to ensuring every employee can engage with our global network, excel in their role and elevate their career. Our Total Rewards Compensation Program, includes our unique Global Career Structure framework, combining career planning and development resources and tools
within a consistent career structure.
Conducting our business with integrity
Jacobs' ethics and Code of Conduct are rooted in our values and provide the standards and support to help us successfully navigate issues, make the right decisions and conduct our business with the integrity that reflects our heritage and ethical reputation. We hold our suppliers and business partners to the same standards.
Our culture of caring
BeyondZero® is our approach to the health, safety and security of our people, the protection of the environment and the resilience of Jacobs. Our BeyondZero® culture of caring goes beyond taking health and safety statistics to zero, so that genuine care and respect for all people are fundamental to our culture and reaches beyond our workplace. We work together to create a workplace that values the safety, positive mental health and sense of belonging of all employees.
While our BeyondZero journey started with safety, as we continued to drive our injury rates down, we also expanded our thinking to our broader culture of caring and particularly mental health. Through our mental health matters program, we furthered our industry-leading efforts to empower our workforce, so they know they work in an environment where their mental health and well-being is the keytop priority and where everyone can "bring their whole self to work." We have almost 2,000 Positive Mental Health Champions trained in how to guide staff who have mental health concerns or crises to the appropriate level of help; support fellow employees; and help us encourage positive mental health throughout the workplace.
Supporting our contributioncommunities
We live and play in the communities where we work - so we’re personally invested in doing what is right for people in the places and communities we’re connected with. We craft solutions that affect the way people live. Thinking beyond one-dimensional approaches to achievinghelp improve social, environmental and economic resiliency. We provide infrastructure, technology and intelligence solutions to help communities build resiliency today for a better tomorrow.
Page 8


From volunteering, employee matching campaigns and other fundraising, to providing wide-ranging technical and logistics support, every day, Jacobs employees around the world make a positive difference for our company vision. By their innovation and determination to embed sustainability into their design and delivery of service, we will contribute significantly to address the challenges facing sustainability through the thousands of clients and their stakeholders, whomcommunities. As part of our PlanBeyond™ sustainability strategy, the Collectively program (our Global Giving and Volunteering program) governs and centralizes our giving strategy and budget and provides a user-friendly way for employees to donate and volunteer. The program unites our approximately 55,000 employees to support more than 2 million charities around the globe.

Page 9


We challenge the accepted
We know that to create a better future, we must ask the difficult questions. We always stay curious and are not afraid to try new things.
What we do is more than a job, we work every day to make the world better for all. To us, everything we do - whether water scarcity, aging infrastructure, access to life-saving therapies or sophisticated cyberattacks - is more than projects outlined in proposals and business plans. They’re our challenges as human beings, too.
Transforming our innovation culture
For us, innovation means creating and delivering value — whether it’s new or different ideas, ways of working, services or solutions. In the past year, we continued pushing our innovative mindset. We established our Innovation as a Service series of workshops and embraced an innovation portfolio management platform to enable collaboration across internal and external teams, facilitating knowledge sharing and leading commercial practices. We launched two Jacobs podcasts series, If/When and Inflection Points, and virtual engagement platforms like our Trends & Directions videocasts and In the kNOW webinar series.

jec-20201002_g5.jpg
Beyond If is our award-winning global innovation program instilling and sustaining our innovation culture. It represents our creativity and agility to challenge the accepted, with every year.

Applying the best, most efficientdomain expertise to push beyond our boundaries and effective sustainable solutionsdeliver for clients worldwide, in all major industries in whichtoday and into tomorrow. We act to turn ideas into reality and create outcomes that deliver value for our clients operate, allows usand society at large.



Page 10


We aim higher
We do not settle - always looking beyond to make a significant contribution to a saferaise the bar and sustainable future. Each year we issue a Sustainability Report that describes many of our efforts and accomplishments regarding sustainability.

With respect to human resources, our goal is to establish an inclusive, diverse workplace that energizes the people who fuel our Company's growth. Although wedeliver with excellence. We are a large company with over 54,700 employees in over 25 countries, our employees are unified in their focus on superior value, safety, and ethical business practices regardless of the country in which they work, and employees frequently move around the globe as they grow their careers.

How We Grow

Jacobs has grown significantly since its founding in 1947.  Both organic growth and strategic acquisitions play an important part of the Company’s growth strategy. We have acquired and integrated numerous companies over the years that have enhanced our capabilities, geographic reach, and offerings.

In terms of organic growth, our relationship-based business model is central to our sustained growth and profitability. We pursue the development of long-term relationships and alliances with our clients. By working with our clients to solve their challenges, we increase our understanding of their overall business needs, as well as the unique technical requirements of their specific projects. This increased understanding enables us to provide superior value to our clients. Our approach provides us with opportunities to market the following services to our clients:

consulting;

system enhancements;

pre-design phases of large projects, which include master planning, project permitting, and project finance options;

design phase; and

construction, post-start-up and commissioning phases of a facility, including operations and maintenance services.

Page 5


Our relationships with clients also present ongoing opportunities to expand into adjacent markets. For example, clients operating in the mining and minerals market often have a need for our infrastructure and buildings capabilities. The same is true for clients operating in other markets.

We market our services to clients in a wide range of public, institutional, process, and industrial markets. We increase our opportunities through focused market diversity, and are able to price contracts competitively and enhance overall profitability while delivering additional valuecommitted to our clients by integratingbringing innovative solutions that lead to profitable growth and bundling our services. In complex economic times,shared success. We take on some of the world’s biggest challenges, bringing a different way of thinking to everything we believedo, challenging the status quo and questioning what others might accept.


We craft solutions that affect the way people live. From first-of-its-kind environmental cleanup efforts to digital twin technologies, from helping communities adapt and thrive to retrofitting vaccine facilities to protect public health, we have the ability to evolve along with market cycles worldwide. When opportunities decrease in a particular market or geography, other opportunities often increase. Becausesolve for better, never losing sight of our responsibility to each other. We work with NASA scientists to leverage remotely-sensed data and images shot from 240 miles overhead on the International Space Station to provide critical disaster response aid, and help communities recover. And, we’re on the ground assisting with critical Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) disaster-related operations throughout the U.S. and its territories.
The table below highlights examples of our key focus areas where we combine our deep domain knowledge with the latest advances in technology to deliver solutions to solve our customer's most complex challenges.
jec-20201002_g6.jpg
jec-20201002_g7.jpg
BeyondExcellence℠ is our global program focused marketon quality, performance excellence and recognizing those who set the new standard through our awards program.

Page 11



We live inclusion
We put people at the heart of our business. We have an unparalleled focus on inclusion, with a diverse team of visionaries, thinkers and doers. We embrace all perspectives, collaborating to make a positive impact.
The aperture of inclusion is broader than lifestyle and culture. Joining, belonging and thriving - these are Jacobs’ key elements in retaining talent and developing a culture where people want to stay - a place where you can bring your whole self to work. Fiscal 2020 brought a lot of change for our people - a talent force of approximately 55,000 - and we doubled down on making sure talent, inclusion and diversity remained at the top of our priorities by focusing on the employee experience.
Our eight Jacobs Employee Networks (JENs) have nearly 23,000 members among them and work to promote inclusion and equality, not only within Jacobs but with our clients, potential recruits and with the communities that we believeserve. The JENs are entirely employee-led and organized, partnering with leadership to drive strategy and policy.
In 2020, we are well positionedlaunched our global Action Plan for Advancing Justice and Equality. Driven by members of our Black employee network, Harambee, in partnership with our Executive Leadership Team and Jacobs’ Board of Directors, the plan sets out actionable initiatives and measurable objectives to address a wide rangeembedded and systemic racial inequalities both within Jacobs and in communities across the world.
We tied inclusive behavior to our leaders’ performance review and compensation programs and delivered conscious inclusion training to nearly all (98%) of opportunities across many marketsour people.



Page 12


jec-20201002_g8.jpg
jec-20201002_g9.jpg
TogetherBeyond℠ is our approach to living inclusion every day and geographies, which helps us growenabling diversity and equality globally. It’s not just about numbers, statistics or quotas — it’s about every one of our business.

The Role of Acquisitionspeople and Strategic Investments in the Development of Our Business

Whencollective strength we review acquisition targets, we are conscious of the effect the acquisition may have on our client base. take from their unique perspectives, ambitions and dreams.

Page 13


We favor acquisitions that are alignedmaintain agile and disciplined capital deployment
Consistent with our profitable growth strategy, which target enhancementsJacobs pursues acquisitions, divestitures and other transactions to maximize long-term value by continuing to reshape its portfolio to higher value solutions.
On April 26, 2019, Jacobs completed the sale of our capabilitiesits Energy, Chemicals and add valueResources ("ECR") business to our customersWorley Limited, a company incorporated in Australia ("Worley"), for a purchase price of $3.4 billion consisting of (i) $2.8 billion in cash plus (ii) 58.2 million ordinary shares of Worley, subject to adjustments for changes in working capital and shareholders.  We do this by (i) expanding into a new client market; (ii) enhancing the range of services we provide existing clients; and/or (iii) accessing new geographic areas in which our clients either already operate or plan to expand. By expanding into new geographic areas and adding to our existing technical and project management capabilities, we strive to position ourselves as a preferred, single-source provider of technical, professional,certain other items (the “ECR sale”). ECR provided engineering and construction services to our clients.

On August 1, 2017,mainly for energy, chemicals and resources sectors. With the sale of ECR, the Company entered into an Agreementhas exited direct hire construction and Planfixed price lump sum energy related construction.

The Company has deployed capital to accelerate its profitable growth strategy through the following recent acquisitions:
On March 6, 2020, we acquired the nuclear consulting, remediation and program management business of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”John Wood Group ("John Wood Group" or "Wood Group") with CH2M HILL Companies, Ltd. (“CH2M”), and Basketball Merger Sub Inc., a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of the CompanyU.K.-based energy services company.
On June 12, 2019, we acquired The KeyW Holding Corporation (“Merger Sub”KeyW”). Pursuant to and subject, a U.S. based national security technology solutions provider to the termsintelligence, cyber, and conditions of the Merger Agreement, (i) Merger Sub will merge with and into CH2M, with CH2M continuing as the surviving corporation and becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger”) and (ii) each outstanding share of common stock of CH2M will be converted into the right to receive, at the election of the holder thereof in accordance with, and subject to, the terms, conditions and procedures set forth in the Merger Agreement, in each case without interest the following consideration: (a) the combination of (x) $52.85 in cash and (y) 0.6677 shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per share, of the Company; (b) $88.08 in cash; or (c) 1.6693 shares of the Company’s common stock.

The Merger is subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals and approval by CH2M stockholders.

Also, see the following brief description of some of our recent key acquisitions (in reverse chronological order):

counterterrorism communities

On August 31,December 15, 2017, we acquired Blue Canopy, LLC headquartered in Reston, Virginia.  Blue Canopy provides data analytics, cybersecurity and application development.

On January 27, 2017, we acquired Aquenta Consulting Pty Ltd. (“Aquenta”) headquartered in Sydney, Australia.  Aquenta provides integrated project services.

On April 12, 2016, we acquired The Van Dyke Technology Group, Inc. (“Van Dyke”) headquartered in Columbia, Maryland.  Van Dyke provides advanced cybersecurity services and solutions designed to protect sensitive information within classified networks, withCH2M, a focus on supporting the U.S. Intelligence Community.

On December 7, 2015, we acquired J.L. Patterson & Associates (“JLP”) headquartered in Orange, California.  JLP is aprovider of consulting and professionalother services engineering firm specializing in rail planning,the water, environmental, permitting, designtransportation and construction management. It provides servicesnuclear remediation sectors.

During fiscal 2020 the Company repurchased $337.3 million of shares and paid $144.0 million in dividends to numerous public transit agenciesshareholders and is a major provider of professional consulting services to Class 1 railroads across the U.S.

noncontrolling interests.

On March 31, 2015, we acquired Suzhou Hans Chemical Engineering Co. ("SHCE") headquartered in China. SHCE has two specialty Class A design licenses in China’s Chemical, Petrochemical and Pharmaceutical industries, which allow the firm to provide engineering design for chemical projects in China and project management services for various projects in China.

For additional information regarding certain issues related to our acquisition strategy, please refer to Item 1A—  1A-  Risk Factors below.

Page 6


Lines

Impact of COVID-19 on Our Business

During

On March 11, 2020, the second quarterWorld Health Organization characterized the outbreak of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) as a global pandemic and recommended certain containment and mitigation measures. On March 13, 2020, the United States declared a national emergency concerning the outbreak, and the vast majority of states and many municipalities declared public health emergencies or took similar actions. Along with these declarations, there were extraordinary and wide-ranging actions taken by international, federal, state and local public health and governmental authorities to contain and combat outbreaks of COVID-19 in regions across the United States and around the world. These actions included quarantines and “stay-at-home” or “shelter-in-place” orders, social distancing measures, travel restrictions, school closures and similar mandates for many individuals in order to substantially restrict daily activities and orders for many businesses to curtail or cease normal operations unless their work is critical, essential or life-sustaining. Although certain jurisdictions have subsequently taken steps to lift or ease such restrictions to various degrees, many jurisdictions have subsequently reversed, or indicated they are considering reversing, such lifting or easing in response to increased cases of COVID-19. In addition, governments and central banks in the United States and other countries in which we operate have enacted fiscal 2016,and monetary stimulus and assistance measures to counteract the economic impacts of COVID-19.
As it became clear that the pandemic was unparalleled in the rate of community spread, we reorganizedtook early, decisive action to put people first, help flatten the curve and take care of our operations around four global linesclients and communities. In early March, we swiftly restricted travel and established return protocols for both client-related and personal travel. In 10 days, we successfully transitioned more than 85% of our employees to a remote working environment to support physical distancing. Where the essential and mission-critical nature of our work requires us to maintain staff at certain sites or locations, we worked closely with our clients and established project-specific plans designed to ensure the safety of our people and the integrity of our operation. Using technology and optimizing our networks, we continue to offer flexible work scenarios for our people, and to deliver business or “LOBs”. This reorganization was intended to better servecontinuity for and continued collaboration with our clients. Our Executive Leadership Team met daily for the first three months and weekly thereafter, focusing on transparency, agile response and business resiliency; and our global clients, leverageand regional crisis management teams continued to maintain consistent messaging and direct local responses. Regular global Town Halls, a weekly Chair and CEO email and short, self-produced leadership videos share open, transparent information to connect and unite our workforce, help streamlineglobal community.
Page 14


We are a company operating in a critical infrastructure industry, as defined by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Consistent with international, federal, state and local requirements to date, we continue to materially operate. In addition, demand for certain of our services, including those supporting health care relief efforts relating to COVID-19, has increased, and could continue to increase, as a result of COVID-19. Notwithstanding our continued critical operations, and provide enhanced growth opportunities. Our four global lines of business are: Aerospace & Technology, Buildings & Infrastructure, Industrial and Petroleum & Chemicals. Each LOBCOVID-19 has a president that reports directly to the Company's Chairman & CEO. As part of the reorganization, certain support functions (i.e. Sales), which were managed centrally for many years, have been embedded in the lines ofnegatively impacted our business, and report to the respective line of business presidents. The costs of other support functions (e.g., accounting, legal, information technologymay have further adverse impacts on our continued operations, including those listed and other) and certain other activities (e.g., global insurance) are assigned or allocated to each new LOB using a rationale method of assignment/allocation, or remain an element of corporate general and administrative expenses. In connection with the reorganization, the Company significantly modified its cash incentive plan utilizing performance metrics aligned along the new lines of business.

Services

Our services fall into four broad categories: Project Services; Process, Scientific and Systems Consulting Services; Construction Services; and Operations and Maintenance Services.

Project Services

We employ the engineering, architecture, interiors, design, planning, and related disciplines necessary to design and engineer modern process plants, buildings, infrastructure projects, technology and manufacturing facilities, consumer products manufacturing facilities, power plants and stations, pulp and paper plants, and other facilities.

We are capable of providing our clients with a variety of value engineering services, including "safetydiscussed in design". Through safety in design we integrate best practices, hazard analysis, and risk assessment methods early in the design phase of projects, with the goal of eliminating or mitigating injury and damage during the construction, start-up, testing and commissioning, and operations phases of a project.

In the area of construction management, we provide our clients with a wide range of services as an agent for our clients. We may act as program director, whereby we oversee, on the owner's behalf, the complete planning, design, and construction phases of the project. Alternatively, our services may be limited to providing construction consulting.

Project Services also includes planning, scheduling, procurement, estimating, cost engineering, project accounting, project delivery (quality), safety, and all other key support services needed for complete cradle-to-grave project delivery.

Process, Scientific and Systems Consulting Services

We employ the professional and technical skills and expertise with respect to a broad range of consulting services, including: performing pricing studies, market analyses, and financial projections necessary in determining the feasibility of a project; performing gasoline reformulation modeling; analyzing and evaluating layout and mechanical designs for complex processing plants; analyzing automation and control systems; analyzing, designing, and executing bio containment strategies; developing and performing process protocols with respect to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-mandated qualification and validation requirements; and performing geological and metallurgical studies.

AlsoItem 1A, Risk Factors included in this service category are revenues relatingAnnual Report on Form 10-K. Accordingly, we have reduced spending broadly across the Company, only proceeding with operating and capital spending that is critical. We have also ceased all non-essential hiring and reduced discretionary expenses, including certain employee benefits and compensation. Looking ahead, we have developed contingency plans to defense and aerospace-related programs. Such services typically are more technical and scientific in naturereduce costs further if the situation further deteriorates or lasts longer than other project services we provide,current expectations. We will continue to actively monitor the situation and may involve tasks suchtake further actions that alter our business operations as supportingmay be necessary or appropriate for the developmenthealth and testingsafety of conventional weapons systems; weapons modelingemployees, contractors, customers, suppliers or others or as required by international, federal, state or local authorities.

Based on current estimates, we expect the impact of COVID-19 to continue in the first half of fiscal 2021, although to a lesser degree than what was seen in fiscal 2020. Although this business disruption is expected to be temporary, significant uncertainty exists concerning the magnitude, duration and simulations; computer systems development, maintenance, and support; evaluation and testingimpacts of mission-critical control systems; aerospace, testing, and propulsion systems and facilities; cyber security and IT services; and other highly technical or scientific tasks.

Construction Services

In additionthe COVID-19 pandemic, including with regard to the construction management services included under Project Services above, we provide traditional field Construction Serviceseffects on our customers and customer demand for our services. Accordingly, actual results for future fiscal periods could differ materially versus current expectations and current results and financial condition discussed herein may not be indicative of future operating results and trends.

For a discussion of risks and uncertainties related to privateCOVID-19, including the potential impacts on our business, financial condition and public sector clients. We also provide modular construction consulting services. In the arearesults of environmental remediation and restoration, we also provide environmental remedial construction services for a varietyoperations, see Item 1A - Risk Factors.
Page 15


Lines of public and private sector clients.

Page 7


Historically, our field construction activities have been focused primarily on those construction projects for which we perform much of the related engineering and design work. By focusing our construction efforts in this way, we attempt to minimize the risks associated with constructing complex projects based on designs prepared by third parties. Business

The financial risk to us of constructing complex assets based on designs prepared by third parties may be particularly significant on fixed-price contracts, though we ensure appropriate controls are in place to manage risk. However, we will pursue construction-only projects when we can negotiate pricing and other contract terms we deem acceptable and which we believe can result in a fair return for the degree of risk we assume.

Operations and Maintenance Services

Operations and Maintenance (“O&M”) refers to all of the tasks required to operate and maintain large, complex facilities on behalf of clients. We provide key management and support services over all aspects of the operations of a facility, including managing subcontractors and other on-site personnel. O&M also includes process plant maintenance services, which generally involves all tasks required to keep a process plant (typically a refinery or chemical plant) in day-to-day operation.

Within the aerospace and defense areas, O&M often requires us to provide the management and technical support services necessary to operate and maintain such sites as engine test facilities, weapons integration facilities, and high-tech simulation and verification centers. Such O&M contracts also frequently require us to provide facilities management and maintenance services, utilities operations and maintenance services, property management and disposition services, and construction support services.

Within the environmental area, O&M often includes engineering and technical support services as well as program management services necessary to remediate contaminated sites.

Although the gross profit margins we realize from O&M services are generally lower than those associated with the other services we provide, the costs to support maintenance activities are also generally lower. In addition, O&M services offer us an opportunity to build and maintain long-term relationships with clients. This aspect of O&M services greatly reduces the selling costs in respect of such services.

The following table sets forth our revenues from each of our four service categories for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015 (in thousands):

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2,

2015

 

Project Services

 

$

4,805,863

 

 

$

5,738,840

 

 

$

6,307,015

 

Process, Scientific and Systems Consulting Services

 

 

805,144

 

 

 

852,329

 

 

 

1,188,418

 

Construction Services

 

 

3,374,261

 

 

 

3,258,890

 

 

 

3,291,823

 

Operations and Maintenance Services

 

 

1,037,520

 

 

 

1,114,098

 

 

 

1,327,576

 

Total

 

$

10,022,788

 

 

$

10,964,157

 

 

$

12,114,832

 

Segments

As discussed above, the services we provide fall into the following fourtwo lines of business (“LOB”)(LOB): AerospaceCritical Mission Solutions (CMS) and People & Technology, Buildings & Infrastructure, Industrial, and Petroleum & Chemicals,Places Solutions (P&PS) which are also the Company’s reportable segments. 

For additional information regarding our segments, including information about our financial results by segment and financial results by geography, see Note 15 — 19 - Segment Information of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Aerospace & Technology – We provide an in-depth range

Critical Mission Solutions (CMS)
Our Critical Mission Solutions line of scientific,business provides a full spectrum of cyber, data analytics, systems and software application integration services and consulting, enterprise level operations and maintenance and mission IT, engineering construction, nuclear and design, enterprise operations and maintenance, program management, and other highly technical support servicesconsulting solutions to the aerospace, defense, technical and automotive industries in several countries. Long-termgovernment agencies as well as commercial customers. Our representative clients include the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), the Combatant Commands, the U.S. Intelligence Community, NASA, the U.S. Department of Energy (DoE), Ministry of Defence in the U.K., the UKU.K. Nuclear Decommissioning Authority NASA, the U.S. Department of Defense (“DoD”)(NDA), the U.S. Special Operations Command, the U.S. Intelligence community, and the Australian Department of Defence. SpecificDefence, as well as private sector customers mainly in the aerospace, automotive, energy and telecom sectors.
Serving mission-critical end markets

Critical Mission Solutions serves broad sectors, including U.S. government services, cyber, nuclear, commercial, and international sectors.

Fiscal Year 2020
jec-20201002_g10.jpgjec-20201002_g11.jpg
The U.S. government is the world’s largest buyer of technical services, and in fiscal 2020, approximately 79% of CMS’s revenue was earned from serving the DoD, Intelligence Community and Federal Civilian governmental entities.
Trends affecting our government clients include information warfare, cyber, IT modernization, space exploration and intelligence, defense systems and intelligent asset management, which are driving demand for our highly technical solutions.
Page 16


Another trend we are witnessing is an increase in the capabilities of unmanned aircraft and hypersonic weapons, which is impacting both offensive and defensive spending priorities among our clients and is a driver for next generation solutions such as C5ISR (command, control, communications, computer, combat systems, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance) and advanced aeronautical testing, respectively. We are also seeing an increase in space exploration initiatives both from the U.S. government, such as NASA’s Artemis program to return to the moon in 2024, as well as the commercial sector.
Within the nuclear sector, our customers have decades-long initiatives to manage, upgrade, decommission and remediate existing energy infrastructure and nuclear weapons.
Our international customers, which accounted for 13% of fiscal 2020 revenue, have also increased demand for our IT and cybersecurity solutions and nuclear projects, and the U.K. Ministry of Defence continues to focus on accelerating its strategic innovative and technology focused initiatives.
Leveraging our base market of offering valued technical services to U.S. government customers, CMS also serves commercial and international markets. In fiscal 2020, approximately 8% of CMS’s revenue was from various U.S. commercial sectors, including the telecommunications sector, which anticipates a large cellular infrastructure build-out from 4G to 5G technology. And like our government facility-based clients, our commercial manufacturing clients are seeking ways to reduce maintenance costs and optimize their facilities with network connected facilities and equipment to optimize operational systems, which we refer to as Intelligent Asset Management.
Leveraging strong domain expertise to deliver solutions
CMS brings domain-specific capability and cross-market innovations in each of the above sectors by leveraging six core capability groups.
Information Technology Services. Across various business units in CMS, we provide a wide range of software development and enterprise IT solutions. We develop, integrate, modify and maintain software solutions and complex systems. These services include a broad array of lifecycle services, including requirements analysis, design, integration, testing, maintenance, quality assurance and documentation management. Our software activities support all major methodologies, including Agile, DevSecOps and other hybrid methodologies. For our enterprise IT capability, we develop, implement and sustain enterprise information technology systems, with a focus on improving mission performance, increasing security and reducing cost for our customers. Solutions typically include IT service management, data center consolidation, network operations, enterprise architecture, mobile computing, cloud computing and migration, software, infrastructure and platform as a service (SaaS, IaaS and PaaS), and data collection and analytics.
Cyber and Data Analytics. Strongly enhanced by our recent acquisition of KeyW, CMS offers a full suite of cyber services for our government and commercial clients, including defensive cyber operations and training, offensive cyber operations, cloud and data analytics, threat intelligence, intelligence analysis, incident response and forensics, software and infrastructure security engineering, computer forensics and exploitation and information technology-operational technology (IT-OT) convergence services.
C5ISR (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Combat Systems, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance). CMS is a leader in the design, development, analysis, implementation and support of C5ISR systems and technology in any environment, including land, sea, air, space and cyber domains. We provide advanced solutions for collecting, processing, exploiting and disseminating geospatial intelligence for the U.S. and Allied Intelligence Communities and Special Forces organizations. Core capabilities include: imaging systems, radar systems, precision geo-location products, custom packaging and microelectronics and customizable tagging, tracking and locating devices.
Technical Services. We provide a broad range of technical consulting services to our government and commercial clients, including: systems integration, specialized propulsion, avionics, electrical, materials, aerodynamics, manufacturing processes modeling and simulation, testing and evaluation, scientific research, intelligent asset management, program management and consulting. NASA is one of our major government customers in the U.S., iswhere we provide a wide range oftechnology services. For our abilitytelecommunications customers, we provide permitting, site planning and engineering to design, build, operate,enable the development of wireline and maintain highly complex facilities relating to spacewireless communications including the development of 5G small cell sites.
Page 17


Facility Engineering and Operations. We provide services for advanced technical structures and systems, including test and evaluation facilities, flight/launch facilities, R&D facilities, test facilities and support infrastructure.military range facilities. Customers also engage us to operate, maintain and provide technical services for these facilities and systems over their lives. We also provide environmental characterizationsustainment and restorationtechnical services to

Page 8


commercial and government customers both in the US and UK. This includes designing, building and operating high hazard remediation systemsfor facility-oriented clients including for radiologically contaminated media.

In addition,the automotive industry where we design and buildprovide highly technical aerodynamic, climatic, altitude and acoustic solutions for our customer research and development operations.

Nuclear Solutions. We provide support across the full nuclear life cycle, including new build, operational support, and decommissioning. Support includes project management, engineering, technical and R&D services, complemented by the full range of CMS’ other services. Customers include the U.S. DoE, the UK’s NDA, and commercial companies such as EDF Energy, the UK’s largest producer of low-carbon energy.
Applying internally-developed technology
Across multiple businesses within CMS we license internally developed technology such as:
KeyRadar®: The acquisition of KeyW brought numerous internally developed technologies, including KeyRadar, a scalable, software-defined synthetic aperture radar that can be configured to address a variety of missions, ranging from foliage penetration to long-range maritime domain awareness or long-range moving target detection.
Ginkgo: Ginkgo is the only virtual learning environment specifically created for cybersecurity training. Designed by experienced cyber instructors, Ginkgo offers a complete solution for implementing hands-on IT and cybersecurity training for both local and distance learning environments on desktops, tablets, and other mobile devices.
ion©: ion© is our open architecture, multi-protocol Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) software solution providing an integrated, secure, and scalable platform for data aggregation integration, analysis and visualization. Ion© is both licensed and delivered as-a-service (aas) to commercial customers around the globe to enable a host of operational solutions, ranging from worker monitoring and safety to industrial asset visibility and management to smart/connected construction. Most recently, Jacobs is using ion© to support Return to Work solutions that allow our pharmaceutical clients to return mission essential personnel to their advanced research and production facilities despite the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Page 18


People & Places Solutions (P&PS)
Jacobs' People & Places Solutions line of business provides end-to-end solutions for our clients’ most complex projects - whether connected mobility, integrated water management, smart cities, advanced manufacturing or environmental stewardship. In doing so, we employ predictive analytics, artificial intelligence and automation, digital twin technology, IoT smart sensors, geospatial visualization and advanced delivery processes and tools for consulting, planning, architecture, design, engineering, and implementation, as well as long-term operation of facilities and infrastructure. Solutions may be delivered as standalone engagements or through comprehensive program management that integrates disparate workstreams to yield additional benefits not attainable through project-by-project implementation. We also provide progressive design-build and construction management at-risk delivery for our P&PS clients.
Our clients include national, state and local government in the U.S., Europe, U.K., Middle East, Australia, New Zealand and Asia, as well as multinational private sector clients throughout the world.
Fiscal Year 2020
jec-20201002_g12.jpgjec-20201002_g13.jpg
Serving broad market sectors that support people and places
Aging infrastructure; climate action; urbanization; water, food and energy security; global supply chains; pandemic preparedness and response; environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG); and digital transformation are driving new challenges and opportunities for our clients. These drivers are highlighting the need for holistic, integrated technology solutions that draw on the domain knowledge resident in the multidisciplinary consulting and delivery expertise of our global workforce. For example, an airport is no longer simply aviation infrastructure but is now a smart city with extensive operational, cybersecurity and autonomous mobility requirements, as well as the contactless travel requirements necessary to best manage COVID-19. Master planning for a city now requires advanced analytics to plan for climate adaption and next-generation mobility as well as revenue generating fiber infrastructure. Furthermore, the future of nearly all water infrastructure will be highly technology-enabled, leveraging solutions with digital twins, predictive analytics and smart metering technology to ensure we're giving communities, industries and regions the secure water resource they need to flourish and expand.
This increase in technology requirements is a key factor in our organic growth strategy as well as our recent acquisitions and divestitures. Moreover, our business model is evolving to provision a broader spectrum of digital- and technology-enabled solutions to address our infrastructure clients' challenges with less exposure to craft construction services. Our focus on the five core sectors of Transportation, Water, Built Environment, Environmental and Advanced Facilities provides us with the ability to leverage our expansive domain expertise across all global markets, enabling truly end-to-end connected solutions for our clients' most complex major projects and programs, including the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games, Expo 2020 Dubai, and the LaGuardia Airport Redevelopment.
Page 19


Today, we are executing complex solutions that pull expertise from all markets, fused with digital expertise, for major developments in places like London, Dubai, Sydney, Singapore, Miami, Los Angeles and Toronto.
Leveraging our global platform to deliver integrated solutions to clients
One of our key differentiators is our global integrated delivery model, which harnesses deep domain expertise from our global Solutions and Technology organization that is leveraged with the benefits of scale when we focus the world’s best talent to deliver innovative solutions and value to our clients.
Within transportation, we provide sustainable solutions to plan, develop, finance, design engineer, construct, operate and maintain next generation mobility across all modes, including highway, bridge, rail and transit, aviation, port and maritime infrastructure. For example, we do this by assessing the impact of autonomous vehicles on roadways and cities for transportation agencies, engineering and specifying vehicles for mass-transit; delivering consulting services for digital fare payment systems; providing program management of the largest airport developments, designing cutting edge automated container terminals and ports infrastructure and utilizing big data to develop cross modal mobility solutions. Our clients encompass the world’s largest transportation agencies as well as private shipping and logistics companies worldwide, including the multi-modal Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Transport for London, Highways England, Transport for New South Wales and Etihad Rail.
Water is one of the most precious resources in the world. Extreme weather events in the form of droughts, desertification and flooding are stressing water supplies, at the same time as population growth and industrialization are increasing demand. Addressing these challenges, we provide integrated solutions across water and wastewater treatment, water reuse, and water resources such as the deployment of next generation smart metering, digital twin technology and highly technical consulting, engineering, design-build and operation of complex water systems. We support our clients on some of the world’s largest water infrastructure projects such as California WaterFix, Thames Tideway, Houston Water and Singapore National Water Agency.
For the built environment, we deliver full-service architecture, engineering, interiors, planning, urban design, landscape architecture and project delivery solutions for government, corporate, commercial, institutional and industrial clients across diverse sectors. Our technology-enabled expertise ranges from the future of work, transaction advisory and asset management to transportation hubs, urban developments, government, healthcare, higher education and science facilities, as well as sports and entertainment venues. We plan and deliver resilient, triple bottom line-based solutions that are connected, secure and smart, including the rebuild of Tyndall Air Force Base in Florida into a visionary Installation of the Future; the corporate headquarters and research facility relocation of Spark Therapeutics in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and the expanded Blacktown Mount Druitt Hospital in New South Wales, Australia.
In our environmental business, we utilize a multidisciplinary, systems-oriented approach to develop environmental planning for infrastructure development; data-driven site remediation and regeneration for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and other known and emerging contaminants; environmental health & safety (EHS) operational excellence and information management; and climate action solutions that incorporate sustainability and resiliency principles as essential to the well-being of all people and of our planet. We also provide post-disaster response and recovery services in support of the automotive industry, and are a provider of a wide range of services in the telecommunications market.

Our experience in the defense sector includes military systems acquisition management and strategic planning; operations and maintenance of test facilities and ranges; test and evaluation services in computer, laboratory, facility, and range environments; test facility computer systems instrumentation and diagnostics; and test facility design and build. We also provide systems engineering and integration of complex weapons and space systems, as well as hardware and software design of complex flight and ground systems.

We have provided advanced technology engineering services to the DoD for more than 50 years, and currently support major defense programs inFederal Emergency Management Agency’s mission throughout the U.S. and internationally. We operate and maintain several DoD test centers and provide services and assist in the acquisition and development of systems and equipmentIn addition to providing end-to-end technology-enabled solutions for Special Operations Forces, as well as the development of biological,multinational oil & gas, chemical and nuclear detectionlife sciences, mining, manufacturing and protection systems.

We maintain enterprise information systemsenergy clients, Jacobs provides comprehensive environmental services for governmentthe U.S. Department of Defense, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, NASA and commercial clients worldwide, ranging fromother civilian agencies, the operation of complex computational networks to the development and validation of specific software applications. We also support the DoDUK Environment Agency, and the intelligence community in a numberAustralian Department of information technology programs, including network design, integration, and support; command and control technology; development and maintenance of databases and customized applications; and cyber security solutions.

Buildings & Infrastructure – WeDefense.

Within advanced facilities, we provide services to transit, aviation, built environment, mission critical, rail, and civil construction projects throughout North America, Europe, India, the Middle East, Australia, and Asia.  Our representative clients include national government departments/agencies in the U.S., U.K., Australia, and Asia, state and local departments of transportation within the U.S., and private industry freight transport firms.

Typical projects include providing development/rehabilitation plansfully integrated solutions for highways, bridges, transit, tunnels, airports, railroads, intermodal facilities, and maritime or port projects. Our interdisciplinary teams can work independently or as an extension of the client’s staff.  We have experience with alternative financing methods, which have been used in Europe through the privatization of public infrastructure systems.

Our water infrastructure group aids emerging economies, which are investing heavily in water and wastewater systems, and governments in North America and Europe, which are addressing the challenges of drought and an aging infrastructure system.  We develop or rehabilitate critical water resource systems, water/wastewater conveyance systems, and flood defense projects.

We also plan, design, and construct buildings for a variety of clients and markets. We believe our global presence and understanding of contracting and delivery demands keep us well positioned to provide professional services worldwide. Our diversified client base encompasses both public and private sectors and relates primarily to institutional, commercial, government and corporate buildings, including projects at many of the world's leading medical and research centers, and universities. We focus our efforts and resources in two areas: where capital-spending initiatives drive demand, and where changes and advances in technology require innovative, value-adding solutions. We also provide integrated facility management services (sometimes through joint ventures with third parties) for which we assume responsibility for the ongoing operation and maintenance of entire commercial or industrial complexes on behalf of clients.

We have specific capabilities in energy and power, master planning, and commissioning of office headquarters, aviation facilities, mission-critical facilities, municipal and civic buildings, courts and correctional facilities, mixed-use and commercial centers, healthcare and education campuses, and recreational complexes.  For advanced technology clients, who require highly specialized buildingsfacilities in the fields of medical research, nano science,sustainable manufacturing, nanoscience, biotechnology, semiconductor and laser sciences, we offer total integrated designdata centers. Our services span the full range of facility work, from early planning and construction management solutions.  We also have global capabilities in the pharma-bio, data center, government intelligence, corporate headquarters/interiors, and science and technology-based education markets. Our government building projects include large, multi-year programs in the U.S. and Europe supporting various U.S. and U.K. government agencies.

We added specialist integrated project services capabilitysite selection through the Aquenta acquisition in Australia in early 2017. These skills include cost management & analysis, project planning & controls, contract & commercial advisory services, and

Page 9


project management services. These services are provided across the breadth of Jacobs client sectors with the potential to further expand to other geographies.

Industrial – We providearchitecture, engineering, procurement, project management, construction and on-site maintenancefacility operations, all tailored to our global clients in the Life Sciences, Mining & Minerals, Specialty Chemicals & Manufacturing and Field Services markets.  We provide our Life Sciences clients single-point consulting, engineering, procurement, construction management, and validation project delivery, enabling us to execute large capital programs on a single-responsibility basis. Typical projectsspecific client needs in the life sciences sector include laboratories, research and development facilities, pilot plants, bulk active pharmaceutical, ingredient production facilities, full-scale biotechnology production facilities,specialty manufacturing, microelectronics and tertiary manufacturing facilities.

We providedata intensive industries. As the largest professional services relatingprovider to modular construction,the biopharmaceutical industry, we are working with our multinational clients to rapidly increase capacity for vaccines and therapeutics, as well as other consultingreshoring manufacturing facilities, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Representative projects include the retrofit of AstraZeneca’s West Chester, Ohio manufacturing facility to deliver a potential COVID-19 vaccine;

Page 20


the Mountbatten Nanotechnology Electronics Research Complex, University of Southampton, U.K.; and strategic planningthe Procter & Gamble, Singapore Innovation Center.
Applying internally developed technology
A strong foundation of data-rich innovative solutions is woven into every project that we deliver. This may include Jacobs-developed proprietary software that employs an array of technical expertise to enable the most efficient, effective and predictable solutions for our clients. Examples of these technologies include:
TrackRecord is a workflow automation and compliance management platform for the delivery of major projects.
AquaDNA is a predictive analytics platform that integrates innovative technologies for wastewater asset management through an AI learning platform, facilitating a move from reactive to proactive maintenance and reduced operation and maintenance costs.
Travel Service Optimisation (TSO) is Jacobs' travel sharing solution for Special Education needs children which centers on the children’s ability to travel together rather than focusing on their disability.
SafetyWeb is a site hazard management and compliance tool.
ProjectMapper is a web based geospatial mapping and project visualization software platform.
Flood Modeller provides proactive decision-making to help manage our clients complete capital projects fasterenvironment and more efficiently.

In addition, we offer services in containment, barrier technology, locally controlled environments, building systems automation, and off-the-site design and fabrication of facility modules, as well as vaccine production and purification, and aseptic processing.

Our mining and minerals business targets the non-ferrous and ferrous metal markets, precious metals, energy minerals (uranium, coal, oil sands), and industrial and fertilizer minerals (borates, trona, phosphates and potash). We workchallenges associated with many resource companies undertaking new and existing facility upgrades, process plant and underground and surface material handling and infrastructure developments.

We offer project management, front-end studies, full engineering, procurement and construction management (“EPCM”) and engineering, procurement and construction (“EPC”) capabilities, and completions, commissioning and start-up services specializing in new plant construction, brownfield expansions, and sustaining capital and maintenance projects.  We are also able to deliver value to our mining clients by providing distinctive adjacent large infrastructure capabilities to support their mining operations.

We provideflood risk. It is suitable for a wide range of specialty chemicals & manufacturing servicesengineering and productsenvironmental applications, from calculating simple backwater profiles and modeling entire catchments to our global client base.   Our specialty chemicals areas are focused on sulfuric acids, synthetic chemicals,mapping potential flood risk for entire countries.

ion© is an Industrial Internet of Things (IoT) multi-protocol wireless application networking system which provides an open, integrated, secure and manufactured equipment.  Our manufacturing business areas include the Food & Beverage, Consumer Products,scalable system for data aggregation and Pulp & Paper markets.

Our global Field Services unit supports constructionviewing.

Replica™ is Jacobs’ digital twin solution software platform and O&M across the company, and performs our direct hire services.

Our construction activities include both construction management services and traditional field construction services to our clients.  Historically, our field construction activities focused primarily on those construction projects where we perform muchconsists of the related engineeringfollowing capabilities:

Replica Parametric Design™ (formerly CPES™) provides outputs on construction quantities and costs, life cycle quantities and costs, and estimates of environmental impacts. Rapid process design work.  However, we pursue construction-only projects when wein Replica Process and the resulting development of the Replica Parametric Designs allows for thorough alternatives analysis and enhanced team communication.  
Replica Preview™ is used for early stage visualization of facility designs. This software rapidly creates scaled three-dimensional designs, which can negotiate pricingbe placed on Google Earth®. Rapid design development in Replica Parametric Design and other contract terms we deem acceptablevisualization with Replica Preview allows for informed analysis of many alternatives and which we believesound decision-making.
Replica Systems Analysis™ (formerly Voyage™) is a flexible platform that can resultsimulate resource systems dynamically, over time. Examples of modeled systems include water resources, energy, solid waste and traffic. The ability to connect complex systems together in a fair returnsingle interface that is visually intuitive leads to informed team collaboration and creative solutions.
Replica Process™ allows Jacobs' world-renowned expertise in water treatment to be simulated both statically and dynamically over time in Replica Process™ software. Much of the process predictive capabilities in Replica Process are founded on the Jacobs' Pro2D2™ and Source™ software. Informed decisions are founded on the ability of Replica Process to provide details on system performance among many alternatives, very quickly.
Replica Hydraulics™ was designed to simulate all pressurized and gravity flow hydraulics of a system, simultaneously. Replica’s hydraulic blocks were built on accepted engineering practice equations and have been successfully verified on hundreds of projects. The Replica Hydraulics library is the foundation for complete, dynamic water system analysis and can be used exclusively for hydraulic analysis of a system or in conjunction with Replica Process, Replica Controls and/or Replica Air.
Replica Controls™ allows for dynamic simulation of system instrumentation such as flow meters, indicator transmitters, limit switches and stream analyzers as well as the degree of risk we assume.

In our O&M business, we perform tasks requiredlogic objects including PID controllers, sequencers, units, controller and alarms. The software's controls capabilities and functionality align with industry design standards and its ability to operate and maintain large, complex facilities on behalf of clients.  We provide key management and support services overpredict full scale performance is unmatched due to the connectivity with Replica Hydraulics.

Page 21


Replica Air™ simulates all aspects of a compressible fluid (e.g. air) supply system, including pipes, valves, diffusers and blowers. The ability to couple Replica Air with Replica Controls in a single simulation allows for the development of unique and robust designs that reduce energy use and life cycle costs.

Energy, Chemicals and Resources (ECR)
ECR Disposition
On April 26, 2019, Jacobs completed the sale of its Energy, Chemicals and Resources (ECR) business to Worley Limited, a company incorporated in Australia (Worley), for a purchase price of $3.4 billion consisting of (i) $2.8 billion in cash plus (ii) 58.2 million ordinary shares of Worley, subject to adjustments for changes in working capital and certain other items (the ECR sale).
As a result of the ECR sale, substantially all ECR-related assets and liabilities were sold (the "Disposal Group"). We determined that the disposal group should be reported as discontinued operations in accordance with ASC 210-05, Discontinued Operations because their disposal represents a strategic shift that had a major effect on our operations and financial results. As such, the financial results of a facility,the ECR business are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Additionally, assets and liabilities of the ECR business were reflected as held-for-sale in the Consolidated Balance Sheets through September 27, 2019. As of the year ended October 2, 2020, all of the ECR business to be sold under the terms of the sale has been conveyed to Worley and as such, no amounts remain held for sale. For further discussion see Note 15- Sale of Energy, Chemicals and Resources ("ECR") Business to the consolidated financial statements.
Prior to the sale, the ECR business served the energy, chemicals and resources sectors, including managing subcontractorsupstream, midstream and other on-site personnel.  O&M also includes process plant maintenance services, which generally involves all tasks required to keep a process plant (typically a refinery or chemical plant) in day-to-day operation.

Petroleum & Chemicals – We providedownstream oil, gas, refining, chemicals and mining and minerals industries. The ECR business provided integrated delivery of complex projects for our Oil and Gas, Refining, and Petrochemical sectorPetrochemicals clients. Bridging the upstream, midstream and downstream industries, our end to endECR's services encompassencompassed consulting, engineering, design, procurement, construction, commissioning, start-up and maintenance and project management.

We provide services relating to both onshore and offshore oil and gas production facilities, including stationary and floating platforms and subsea tie-backs, as well as full field development solutions, including processing facilities, gathering systems, transmission pipelines, storage and terminals.  Our heavy oil processing experience makes us a leader in upgrading, steam-assisted gravity drainage and in-situ oil sands projects.  We have developed and delivered modular well pad and central processing facility designs. We also provide fit-for-purpose and standardized designs in the onshore conventional and unconventional oil & gas sector, paying particular attention to water and environmental issues.

Page 10


In addition, we provide our refining customers with feasibility/economic studies, technology evaluation and conceptual engineering, front end engineering & design, detailed engineering, procurement, construction, commissioning, start-up and maintenance services.  We deliver installed EPC solutions to grass root plants, and offer expansions and revamps of existing units.  Our focus is on both the inside the battery limit processing units as well as utilities and offsites infrastructure.  We have engineering alliances and onsite maintenance programs that span decades with core clients.  With the objective of driving our clients’ total installed costs down, we endeavor to leverage emerging market sourcing and high value engineering centers (HVEC).  Our Comprimo Sulfur Solutions® is a significant patented technology for gas treatment and sulfur recovery plants around the world.

We also provide services to technically complex petrochemical facilities; from new manufacturing complexes, to expansions and modifications, and the overall management of plant relocations.  We have experience with many licensed chemical processing technologies, integrated basic petrochemicals, commodity and specialty chemicals projects, and olefins, aromatics, synthesis gas and their respective derivatives.

Backlog

Backlog represents the total dollar amount of revenues we expect to record in the future as a result of performing work under contracts that have been awarded to us. With respect to O&M contracts, however, we include in backlog the amount of revenues we expect to receive for only one succeeding year, regardless of the remaining life of the contract. For national government programs (other than U.S. federal O&M contracts), our policy is to include in backlog the full contract award, whether funded or unfunded, excluding option periods. In accordance with industry practice, substantially all of our contracts are subject to cancellation, termination, or suspension at the discretion of the client. In addition, the contracts in our backlog are subject to changes in the scope of services to be provided as well as adjustments to the costs relating to the contracts. Accordingly, backlog is not necessarily indicative of our future revenues or earnings.

Our backlog includes expected revenues for contracts that are based on estimates. The following table summarizes our backlog for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015 (in thousands): 

Backlog:

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2,

2015

 

Aerospace & Technology

 

$

6,231,426

 

 

$

5,109,973

 

 

$

4,880,775

 

Buildings & Infrastructure

 

 

5,412,377

 

 

 

5,033,539

 

 

 

4,723,034

 

Industrial

 

 

2,836,854

 

 

 

3,106,575

 

 

 

3,650,520

 

Petroleum & Chemicals

 

 

5,307,956

 

 

 

5,510,442

 

 

 

5,552,241

 

Total

 

$

19,788,613

 

 

$

18,760,529

 

 

$

18,806,570

 

For additional information regarding our backlog including those risk factors specific to backlog, please refer to Item 1A — Risk Factors, and Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations below. Subject to the factors discussed in Item 1A— Risk Factors below, we estimate that approximately $7 billion, or 35%, of total backlog at September 29, 2017 will be realized as revenues within the next fiscal year.

Significant Customers

The following table sets forth the percentage of total revenues earned directly or indirectly from agencies of the U.S. federal government for each of the last fivethree fiscal years:  

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

19.2%

 

 

 

21.4%

 

 

 

21.7%

 

 

 

17.8%

 

 

 

19.9%

 

20202019 2018
33%27% 32%

Given the percentage of total revenue derived directly from the U.S. federal government, the loss of U.S. federal government agencies as customers would have a material adverse effect on the Company. In addition, any or all of our government contracts could be terminated, we could be suspended or debarred from all government contract work, or payment of our costs could be disallowed. Approximately 88%80% of revenue derived directly from the U.S. federal government is in the Aerospace & TechnologyCMS segment. For more information on risks relating to our government contracts, see Item 1A - Risk Factors.

Page 11


Financial Information About Geographic Areas

Selected financial information regarding the geographic areas in which we operate is included in Note 15 — Segment Information of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference. For fiscal 2017, approximately 42% of our revenues were earned from clients outside the United States. Our international operations are subject to a variety of risks, which are described under Item 1A - Risk Factors below.

Factors.

Contracts

While there is considerable variation in the pricing provisions of the contracts we undertake, our contracts generally fall into two broad categories: cost-reimbursable and fixed-price. The following table sets forth the percentages of total revenues represented by these types of contracts for each of the last fivethree fiscal years:

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

20202019 2018

Cost-reimbursable

 

 

81

%

 

 

82

%

 

 

83

%

 

 

83

%

 

 

85

%

Cost-reimbursable76%76%74%

Fixed-price

 

 

19

%

 

 

18

%

 

 

17

%

 

 

17

%

 

 

15

%

Fixed-price, limited riskFixed-price, limited risk17%18%19%
Fixed-price, at riskFixed-price, at risk7%6%7%

In accordance with industry practice, most of our contracts (including those with the U.S. federal government) are subject to termination at the discretion of the client, which is discussed in greater detail in Item 1A - Risk Factors. In such situations, our contracts typically provide for reimbursement of costs incurred and payment of fees earned through the date of termination.

When we are directly responsible for engineering, design, procurement, and construction of a project or the maintenance of a client’s plant or facility, we reflect the costs of materials, equipment, and subcontracts in both revenues and costs. On other projects, where the client elects to pay for such items directly and we have no associated responsibility for such items, these amounts are not reflected in either revenues or costs. The following table sets forth the approximate amount of such pass-through costs included in revenues for each of the last five fiscal years (in millions of dollars):

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

$

2,539.3

 

 

$

2,489.9

 

 

$

2,602.6

 

 

$

2,954.9

 

 

$

2,624.8

 

Page 22



Cost-Reimbursable Contracts

Cost-reimbursable contracts generally provide for reimbursement of costs incurred plus an amount of profit. The profit element may be in the form of a simple mark-up applied to the labor costs incurred or it may be in the form of a fee, or a combination of a mark-up and a fee. The fee element can also take several forms. The fee may be a fixed amount; it may be an amount based on a percentage of the costs incurred; or it may be an incentive fee based on targets, milestones, or performance factors defined in the contract. In general, we prefer cost-reimbursable contracts because we believe the primary reason for awarding a contract to us should be our technical expertise and professional qualifications rather than price.

Fixed-Price Contracts

Fixed-price contracts include both “lump sum bid” contracts and “negotiated fixed-price” contracts. Under lump sum bid contracts, we typically bid against other contractorscompetitors based on specifications the client furnishes.client-furnished specifications. This type of pricing presents certain inherent risks, including the possibility of ambiguities in the specifications received, problems with new technologies, and economic and other changes that may occur over the contract period. Additionally, it is not unusual for lump sum bid contracts to lead to an adversarial relationship with clients, which is contrary to our relationship-based business model. Accordingly, lump sum bid contracts are not our preferred form of contract, and, as such, the Company has rarely entered into individual lump sum bid contracts that are material to its financial results.contract. In contrast, under a negotiated fixed-price contract, we are selected as the contractor first and then we negotiate a price with our client. Negotiated fixed-price contracts frequently exist in single-responsibility arrangements where we perform some portion of the work before negotiating the total price of the project. Thus, although both types of contracts involve a firm price for the client, the lump sum bid contract provides the greater degree of risk to us.us in our services contracts as well as construction. However, because of economies that may be realized during the contract term, both negotiated fixed-price and lump sum bid contracts may offer greater profit potential than other types of contracts. The Company carefully manages the risk inherent in these types of contracts.  Over the past fiveIn recent years, most of our fixed-price work has been either negotiated fixed-price contracts or lump sum bid contracts for design and/or project services, rather than turnkey construction.

Page 12


Competition

With respect to each of the four broad categories of services we provide, we

We compete with a large number of companies across the world.world including technology consulting, federal IT services, aerospace, defense and engineering firms. Typically, no single company or companies dominate the marketmarkets in which we provide any such services.services and in many cases we partner with our competitors or other companies to jointly pursue projects. AECOM, Booz Allen, CACI, KBR, Leidos, Parsons, SAIC, Tetra Tech, WSP, General Dynamics and Northrop Grumman are some of our competitors. We compete based on the following factors, among others: price of services, technical capabilities, reputation for quality, price of services, safety record, availability of qualified personnel, and ability to timely perform work and willingnesscontract terms.
Human Capital Management
At Jacobs, our people are the heart of our business. With our culture of caring and inclusion as our foundation, we celebrate the differences that drive our collective strength and encourage our employees that there is no limit to accept project-related risk. For more information regardingwho they can be and what we can achieve. Together we deliver extraordinary solutions for a better tomorrow and live by our employee value statement: Jacobs. A world where you can.
As of October 2, 2020, we had a workforce of approximately 55,000 people worldwide, including a contingent workforce of approximately 3,000 people. The breakdown of our employees by region is as follows:

Region
Percentage of Global Workforce(1)
Americas62 %
Europe (including U.K)23 %
Asia Pacific (including India)12 %
Middle East and Africa%
(1) Excludes contingent workforce

Hiring, Training and Developing our Workforce
The success of Jacobs is dependent on our ability to hire, retain, engage and leverage highly qualified employees, including engineers, architects, designers, digital specialists, craft employees and corporate professionals. We put the competitive conditions
Page 23


spotlight on ensuring that Jacobs is an employer of choice in every way: we aspire to be a merit-based organization that is inclusive and diverse; we are building an inclusive culture where all employees feel they belong. Our culture is the foundation for selecting, developing and retaining the best and brightest minds at Jacobs. Our eight Jacobs Employee Networks (JENs) play a critical role in attracting new talent into our business, please referhelping to Item 1A— Risk Factors below.

Employees

shape our recruiting strategies and policies, our science, technology, engineering, arts and math programs, and our accessibility practices. In fiscal 2020, more than1,300 graduates, interns and apprentices were welcomed to our global team.

In fiscal 2020, we launched our new employee experience e3: engage. excel. elevate. From a talent profile for every employee to providing continuous celebrations and feedback, and learning new skills and driving performance, e3 is our unique approach to ensuring every employee can engage, excel in their role and elevate their career. We also introduced GlobalShare to enhance our ability to resolve short-term staffing needs and enable employees to pursue opportunities across Jacobs. We also made enhancements to some of our policies to deliver greater work-day flexibility to employees. Additionally, we undertook several new initiatives related to our Total Rewards Program, including implementing our Global Career Structure framework, combining career planning and development resources and tools within a consistent career structure, and a global pay equity review of our pay systems and processes to make pay equity a lasting reality at Jacobs.
Focus on Inclusion and Diversity
At September 29, 2017,Jacobs we have an unparalleled focus on inclusion, with a diverse team of visionaries, thinkers and doers. We embrace all perspectives, collaborating to make a positive impact. The aperture of inclusion is broader than lifestyle and culture. Joining, belonging and thriving are Jacobs’ key elements in retaining talent and developing a culture where people want to stay – and a place where you can bring your best, whole self to work.
TogetherBeyondis our approach to living inclusion every day and enabling diversity and equality globally – it is not just about numbers and statistics, but about every one of our people and the collective strength we take from their unique perspectives and ambitions.
Having a culture of belonging where everyone can join in and thrive allows us to recruit and retain the best global talent and drive innovative solutions for our business, clients and communities. “We live inclusion” is supported by the strength of tangible leadership commitment and accountability at Jacobs. In that regard, we have tied inclusive behavior to our leaders’ performance review and compensation programs and delivered conscious inclusion training to nearly all (98%) of our people.
As of October 2, 2020, our U.S. employees had approximately 44,800 full-time, staffthe following race and ethnicity demographics:

October 2, 2020
All U.S. Employees (1)
White71.4 %
Hispanic / Latino8.9 %
Black8.5 %
Asian6.8 %
Multiracial2.0 %
American Indian or Alaska Native0.4 %
Native Hawaiian / Other Pacific Islander0.3 %
Not provided1.7 %
(1) Includes U.S. employee population only (excluding approximately 2,000 craft employees)

Over the last year, we have seen tangible examples of progress resulting from our approach to inclusion. In fiscal 2020, we launched our global Action Plan for Advancing Justice and Equality. Driven by members of our Black employee network, Harambee, in partnership with our Executive Leadership Team and Jacobs’ Board of Directors, the Action Plan sets out actionable initiatives and measurable objectives to address advance equality within the company and around the communities where we work.
Page 24


As of October 2, 2020, our global employees (including contract staff). Additionally,had the following gender demographics:

October 2, 2020
WomenMen
All employees29.5%70.5%

Looking ahead, we will continue to focus on inclusion and diversity by:
Following through on our global Action Plan for Advancing Justice and Equality
Striving to achieve our aspirational goals of creating a more gender-balanced and racially/ethnically diverse workforce around the globe to more appropriately reflect the labor markets and communities in which we live and serve
Amplifying our culture of belonging
Measuring employee sense of inclusion and belonging through a global survey
Identifying, developing and promoting allies across Jacobs
We know we have more to do when it comes to increasing the representation of historically underrepresented groups within our global workforce, and we are committed to taking action and ensuring Jacobs is, and remains, an employer of choice.
Our Employees’ Safety and Wellbeing
BeyondZero® is our approach to the health, safety and security of our people, the protection of the environment and the resilience of Jacobs. In fiscal 2020, we continued to demonstrate safety excellence with another year of zero employee fatalities at work, a 25% reduction in employee recordable incidents from fiscal 2019, and a total recordable incident rate of 0.17 (recorded in accordance with OSHA record keeping requirements) as of September 29, 2017, there were approximately 9,900 persons employed in the field on a project basis. The number of field employees varies in relationOctober 2, 2020 – compared to the numberNorth American Industry Classification System’s most recently reported aggregate rate of 0.60.
While our BeyondZero journey started with safety, as we continued to drive our injury rates down, we also expanded our thinking to our broader culture of caring and sizeparticularly mental health. It was this strong foundation that helped us act swiftly at the start of the maintenanceCOVID-19 pandemic. The foundation elements of our existing “Mental Health Matters” program enabled us to respond quickly to launch our “Mental Health Matters Resiliency” program and construction projectsto promote our suicide awareness campaign in progress at any particular time.

fiscal 2020.

In fiscal 2020, almost 2,000 Positive Mental Health Champions (an 11% increase from fiscal 2019) trained to support the mental wellbeing of our employees and one in every 29 employees trained as a Positive Mental Health Champion. In addition, 100% of Jacobs’ Executive Leadership Team participated in Positive Mental Health training.
Information About Our Executive Officers of the Registrant

The information required by Paragraph (a), and Paragraphs (c) through (g) of Item 401 of Regulation S-K (except for information required by Paragraph (e) of that Item to the extent the required information pertains to our executive officers) and Item 405 of Regulation S-K is set forth under the captions “Members of the Board of Directors” and “Section“Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”Reports” in our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year and is incorporated herein by reference.

Page 25


The following table presents the information required by Paragraph (b) of Item 401 of Regulation S-K.

 

 

 

 

 

Year Joined the

Name

 

Age

 

Position with the Company

 

Registrant

Name Age Position with the Company Year Joined the Company

Steven J. Demetriou

 

59

 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

2015

Steven J. Demetriou 62  Chair and Chief Executive Officer 2015

Kevin C. Berryman

 

58

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

2014

Kevin C. Berryman 61  President and Chief Financial Officer 2014

Terence D. Hagen

 

53

 

President, Aerospace & Technology

 

1987

Joseph G. Mandel (1)

 

57

 

Executive Vice President, Integration Management Office

 

2011

Robert V. Pragada

 

49

 

President, Buildings & Infrastructure

 

2016

Robert V. Pragada52 President and Chief Operating Officer2016

William B. Allen

 

53

 

Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

 

2016

Dawne S. HicktonDawne S. Hickton 63  Executive Vice President and COO Critical Mission Solutions 2019
Joanne E. CarusoJoanne E. Caruso60 Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Administrative Officer2012
William B. Allen, Jr.William B. Allen, Jr. 56  Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer 2016

Michael R. Tyler

 

61

 

Senior Vice President and General Counsel

 

2013

Michael R. Tyler 64  Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer 2013

(1)

Mr. Mandel was appointed as Executive Vice President, Integration Management Office on August 2, 2017.  Previously, he served as President, Petroleum & Chemicals.

All of the officers listed in the preceding table serve in their respective capacities at the pleasure of the Board of Directors of the Company. Mr. Hagen has served in executive and senior management capacities with the Company for more than five years. Below is additional information on the other executive officers.

Mr. Demetriou joined the Company in August 2015. Mr. Demetriou served as Chairman and CEO of Aleris Corporation for 14 years, a global downstream aluminum producer based in Cleveland, Ohio. Over the course of his career, he has gained broad experience with companies in a range of industries including metals, specialty chemicals, oil & gas, manufacturing and fertilizers.

Mr. Berryman joined the Company in December 2014. Mr. Berryman served as EVP and CFO for five years at International Flavors and Fragrances Inc., an S&P 500 company and leading global creator of flavors and fragrances used in a wide variety of consumer products. Prior to that, he spent 25 years at Nestlé in a number of finance roles including treasury, mergers & acquisitions, strategic planning and control.

Mr. Hagen joined the Company in 1987.  Mr. Hagen has worked in a number of the Company’s market sectors in both senior operational and sales roles.  Prior to becoming President, Aerospace & Technology, he was the Executive Vice President, Global Sales and Marketing.

Mr. Mandel joined the Company in February 2011 through the acquisition of certain operating companies comprising the process and construction business of Aker Solutions ASA, a global provider of products, systems and services to the oil

Page 13


and gas industry. Mr. Mandel served in various senior management roles with Aker Solutions ASA since first joining them in 1995.

Mr. Pragada rejoined the Company in February 2016 after serving as President and Chief Executive Officer of The Brock Group since August 2014. From March 2006 to August 2014 Mr. Pragada served in executive and senior managementleadership capacities with the Company.

Ms. Hickton joined the Company as Chief Operating Officer and President of Critical Mission Solutions in 2019. Prior to this role, Ms. Hickton served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company and was previously the Vice Chair and Chief Executive Officer for eight years at RTI International Metals, Inc., a global supplier of advanced titanium products and services in commercial aerospace, defense, propulsion, medical device and energy markets.
Ms. Caruso joined the Company in 2012. Prior to becoming Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Administrative Officer, Ms. Caruso was Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer, and previously held the positions of Senior Vice President, Global Human Resources and Vice President, Global Litigation. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Caruso was a partner in two international law firms, Howrey LLP and Baker & Hostetler LLP.
Mr. Allen joined the Company in October 2016. Mr. Allen served as Vice President, Finance and Principal Accounting Officer at Lyondellbasell Industries, N.V. from 2013 to 2016. Prior to that, he was with Albemarle Corporation, where he served as Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer from 2009 to 2013 after serving in CFO roles for their Catalysts and Fine Chemistry businesses from 2005 to 2009.

Mr. Tyler joined the Company in June 2013. He previously served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Sanmina Corporation, a global electronics manufacturing services provider from April 2007 to June 2013, and Chief Legal and Administrative Officer of Gateway, Inc., a computer hardware company, from January 2004 to April 2007.

Available

Page 26


Additional Information

Jacobs was founded in 1947 and incorporated as a Delaware corporation in 1987. We are headquartered in Dallas, Texas, USA. You may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room located at 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. In order to obtain information about the operation of the Public Reference Room, a person may call the SEC at 1-800-732-0330. The SEC also maintains a site on the Internet that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The SEC’s website is http://www.sec.gov. You may also read and download the various reports we file with, or furnish to, the SEC free of charge from our website at www.jacobs.com.

Page 14

27

Item 1A.

RISK FACTORS


Item 1A.    RISK FACTORS
We operate in a changing global environment that involves numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The risks described below highlight some of the factors that have affected and could affect us in the future. We may also be affected by unknown risks or risks that we currently think are immaterial. If any such events actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Construction


Summary Risk Factors

The following is a summary of some of the risks and maintenanceuncertainties that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. You should read this summary together with the more detailed description of each risk factor contained below.

Risks Related to Our Operations

The COVID-19 pandemic, including the measures that international, federal, state and local public health and other governmental authorities implement to address it, have adversely affected, and may continue to adversely affect, our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Project sites are inherently dangerous workplaces. If we, the owner, or others working at the project site fail to maintain safe work sites, and our employees or others become injured, disabled or even lose their lives, we can be exposed to significant financial losses and reputational harm, as well as civil and criminal liabilities.

Construction

Our results of operations depend on the award of new contracts and the timing of the performance of these contracts.
We engage in a highly competitive business. If we are unable to compete effectively, we could lose market share and our business and results of operations could be negatively impacted.
The nature of our contracts, particularly those that are fixed-price, subjects us to risks of cost overruns. We may experience reduced profits or, in some cases, losses if costs increase above budgets or estimates or if the project experiences schedule delays.
The contracts in our backlog may be adjusted, canceled or suspended by our clients and, therefore, our backlog is not necessarily indicative of our future revenues or earnings. Additionally, even if fully performed, our backlog is not a good indicator of our future gross margins.
Contracts with the U.S. federal government and other governments and their agencies pose additional risks relating to future funding and compliance. Our project execution activities may result in liability for faulty services.
Our project execution activities may result in liability for faulty services.
The outcome of pending and future claims and litigation could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our use of joint ventures and partnerships exposes us to risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside of our control
Employee, agent or partner misconduct or our overall failure to comply with laws or regulations could weaken our ability to win contracts, which could result in reduced revenues and profits.
Our international operations are exposed to additional risks and uncertainties, including unfavorable political developments and weak foreign economies.
Cyber security or privacy breaches, or systems and information technology interruption or failure could adversely impact our ability to operate or expose us to significant financial losses and reputational harm.
We are subject to professional standards, duties and statutory obligations on professional reports and opinions we issue, which could subject us to monetary damages.
If we do not have adequate indemnification for our nuclear services, it could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our actual results could differ from the estimates and assumptions used to prepare our financial statements.
An impairment charge on our goodwill could have a material adverse impact on our financial position and results of operations.
Page 28


We may be required to contribute additional cash to meet any underfunded benefit obligations associated with retirement and post-retirement benefit plans we manage.
Demand for our services is cyclical as the sectors and industries in which our clients operate are impacted by economic downturns, reductions in government or private spending and times of political uncertainty.
Rising inflation, interest rates, and/or construction costs could reduce the demand for our services as well as decrease our profit on our existing contracts, in particular with respect to our fixed-price contracts.
Our global presence could give rise to material fluctuations in our income tax rates.
Our businesses could be materially and adversely affected by events outside of our control.
Climate change and related environmental issues could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our continued success is dependent upon our ability to hire, retain, and utilize qualified personnel.
Our business strategy relies in part on acquisitions to sustain our growth. Acquisitions of other companies present certain risks and uncertainties.

Risks Related to Regulatory Compliance

Past and future environmental, health, and safety laws could impose significant additional costs and liabilities.
If we fail to comply with federal, state, local or foreign governmental requirements, our business may be adversely affected.
We could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws.
We may be affected by market or regulatory responses to climate change.

Risks Related to Our Indebtedness

We rely on cash provided by operations and liquidity under our credit facilities to fund our business. Negative conditions in the credit and financial markets and delays in receiving client payments could adversely affect our cost of borrowing and our business.
Maintaining adequate bonding and letter of credit capacity is necessary for us to successfully bid on and win some contracts.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

Our quarterly results may fluctuate significantly, which could have a material negative effect on the price of our common stock.
There can be no assurance that we will pay dividends on our common stock.
In the event we issue stock as consideration for certain acquisitions we may make, we could dilute share ownership, and if we receive stock in connection with a divestiture, the value of stock is subject to fluctuation.
Delaware law and our charter documents may impede or discourage a takeover or change of control.
Risks Related to Our Operations
The COVID-19 pandemic, including the measures that international, federal, state and local public health and other governmental authorities implement to address it, have adversely affected, and may continue to adversely affect, our business, financial condition and results of operations.
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization characterized the outbreak of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) as a global pandemic and recommended certain containment and mitigation measures. On March 13, 2020, the United States declared a national emergency concerning the outbreak, and the vast majority of states and many municipalities declared public health emergencies or taken similar actions. Since then, there have been extraordinary and wide-ranging actions taken by international, federal, state and local public health and governmental authorities to contain and combat the outbreak of COVID-19 in regions across the United States and around the world. These actions include quarantines and “stay-at-home” or “shelter-in-place” orders, social distancing measures, travel restrictions, school closures and similar mandates for many individuals in order to substantially restrict daily activities and orders for many businesses to curtail or cease normal operations unless their work is critical, essential or life-
Page 29


sustaining. Although certain jurisdictions have taken steps to lift or ease such restrictions to various degrees, some jurisdictions have subsequently reversed such lifting or easing in response to increased cases of COVID-19.

The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected, and may continue to adversely affect, certain elements of our business, including, but not limited to, the following:
We have experienced, and may continue to experience, reductions in demand for certain of our services and the delay or abandonment of ongoing or anticipated projects due to our clients’, suppliers’ and other third parties’ diminished financial conditions or financial distress, as well as governmental budget constraints. These impacts are expected to continue or worsen if “stay-at-home”, “shelter-in-place”, social distancing, travel restrictions and other similar orders, measures or restrictions remain in place for an extended period of time or are re-imposed after being lifted or eased. Although we have experienced, and may continue to experience, an increase in demand for certain of our services as a result of new projects that have arisen in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, there can be no assurance that any such increased demand would be sufficient to offset lost or delayed demand.
Government-sponsored stimulus or assistance programs enacted to-date in the United States and in the foreign countries in which we operate in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have only been available to us or our customers or suppliers on a limited basis and are insufficient to address the full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) contains provisions that authorize Federal Agencies to pay contractors to retain key workers where regular work schedules are not possible due to quarantines or other social isolation measures. We have pursued payment for these alternative work arrangements with applicable Federal Agencies or contracting officials and will continue to assess the availability of such subsidies on a contract-by-contract basis. Certain foreign governments are also permitting contracting authorities to revise the terms of government contracts and/or providing various forms of subsidies to compensate companies who maintain their workforce rather than impose layoffs or furloughs. Certain other governments have provided partial expense reimbursement for furloughed employees and also provided for the deferral of payroll taxes. Although we expect to recover a significant portion of COVID-19 related labor costs, we do not expect to recover the full amount of either our labor cost or associated fee. Additionally, these and other government-sponsored assistance and stimulus programs are subject to renewal, modification or termination by the applicable governing bodies. If any government-sponsored program from which we receive benefits is modified or terminated, our benefits thereunder could decline or cease altogether, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, and/or cash flows.
Our clients may be unable to meet their payment obligations to us in a timely manner, including as a result of deteriorating financial condition or bankruptcy resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting economic impacts. Further, other third parties, such as suppliers, subcontractors, joint venture partners and other outside business partners, may experience significant disruptions in their ability to satisfy their obligations with respect to us, or they may be unable to do so altogether.
Many employers, including us, and governments continue to require all or a significant portion of employees to work from home or not go into their offices. While many of our employees can effectively perform their responsibilities while working remotely, some work is not well-suited for remote work, and that work may not be completed as efficiently as if it were performed on site. Additionally, we may be exposed to unexpected cybersecurity risks and additional information technology-related expenses as a result of these remote working requirements.
Illness, travel restrictions or other workforce disruptions could adversely affect our supply chain, our ability to timely and satisfactorily complete our clients’ projects, our ability to provide services to our clients or our other business processes. Even after the COVID-19 pandemic subsides, we could experience a longer-term impact on our operating expenses, including, for example, due to the need for enhanced health and hygiene requirements or the periodic revival of social distancing or other measures in one or more regions in attempts to counteract future outbreaks.
We have furloughed certain employees and may need to further furlough or reduce the number of employees that we employ. We may experience difficulties associated with hiring additional employees or replacing employees, in particular with respect to roles that require security clearances or other special qualifications that may be limited or difficult to obtain. Increased turnover rates of our employees could increase operating costs and create challenges for us in maintaining high levels of employee awareness of
Page 30


and compliance with our internal procedures and external regulatory compliance requirements, in addition to increasing our recruiting, training and supervisory costs.

In addition to existing travel restrictions implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, jurisdictions may continue to close borders, impose prolonged quarantines and further restrict travel and business activity, which could materially impair our ability to support our operations and clients (both domestic and international), to source supplies through the global supply chain and to identify, pursue and capture new business opportunities, and which could continue to restrict the ability of our employees to access their workplaces. We also face the possibility of increased overhead or other expenses resulting from compliance with any future government orders or other measures enacted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The COVID-19 pandemic has increased volatility and pricing in the capital markets, and that increased volatility is likely to continue. While we entered into a new $1 billion term loan facility in the second quarter of fiscal 2020, we might not be able to access further sources of liquidity on acceptable pricing or borrowing terms if at all. Our credit facilities contain customary covenants restricting, among other things, our ability to incur certain liens and indebtedness. We are also subject to certain financial covenants, including maintenance of a maximum consolidated leverage ratio. A breach of any covenant or our inability to comply with the required financial ratios, whether as a result of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business or otherwise, could result in a default under one or more of our credit facilities and limit our ability to do further borrowing. Any inability to obtain additional liquidity as and when needed, or to maintain compliance with the instruments governing our indebtedness, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We operate in many countries around the world, and certain of those countries’ governments may be unable to effectively mitigate the financial or other impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on their economies and workforces and our operations therein.
The continued global spread of the COVID-19 pandemic and the responses thereto are complex and rapidly evolving, and the extent to which the pandemic impacts our business, financial condition and results of operations, including the duration and magnitude of such impacts, will depend on numerous evolving factors that we may not be able to accurately predict or assess. COVID-19, and the volatile regional and global economic conditions stemming from the pandemic, as well as reactions to future pandemics or resurgences of COVID-19, could also precipitate or aggravate the other risk factors that we identify in in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which in turn could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. There may be other adverse consequences to our business, financial condition and results of operations from the spread of COVID-19 that we have not considered or have not become apparent. As a result, we cannot assure you that if COVID-19 continues to spread, it would not have a further adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Project sites are inherently dangerous workplaces. If we, the owner, or others working at the project site fail to maintain safe work sites, and our employees or others become injured, disabled or even lose their lives, we can be exposed to significant financial losses and reputational harm, as well as civil and criminal liabilities.
Project sites often put our employees and others in close proximity with large pieces of mechanized equipment, moving vehicles, chemical and manufacturing processes and highly regulated materials, in a challenging environment and often in geographically remote locations. If we, or others working at such sites, fail to implement such procedures or if the procedures we implement are ineffective, or if others working at the site fail to implement and follow appropriate safety procedures, our employees and others may become injured, disabled or even lose their lives, the completion or commencement of our projects may be delayed and we may be exposed to litigation or investigations. Unsafe work sites also have the potential to increase employee turnover, increase the cost of a project to our clients and raise our operating and insurance costs. Any of the foregoing could result in financial losses or reputational harm, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, our projects can involve the handling of hazardous and other highly regulated materials, which, if improperly handled or disposed of, could subject us to civil and/or criminal liabilities. We are also subject to regulations dealing with occupational health and safety. Although we maintain functional groups whose primary purpose is to ensure we implement effective health, safety and environmental (“HSE”) work procedures throughout our organization, including constructionproject sites and maintenance sites, the failure to comply with such regulations could subject
Page 31


us to liability. In addition, despite the work of our functional groups, we cannot guarantee the safety of our personnel or that there will be no damage to or loss of our work, equipment or supplies.

Our safety record is critical to our reputation. Many of our clients require that we meet certain safety criteria to be eligible to bid for contracts and many contracts provide for automatic termination or forfeiture of some or all of our contract fees or profit in the event we fail to meet certain measures. Accordingly, if we fail to maintain adequate safety standards, we could suffer reduced profitability or the loss of projects or clients, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our vulnerability toresults of operations depend on the cyclical natureaward of new contracts and the timing of the sectorsperformance of these contracts.
Our revenues are derived from new contract awards. Delays in the timing of the awards or cancellations of such projects as a result of economic conditions, material and industries inequipment pricing and availability or other factors could impact our long-term projected results. It is particularly difficult to predict whether or when we will receive large-scale projects as these contracts frequently involve a lengthy and complex bidding and selection process, which our clients operate is exacerbated during economic downturns and times of political uncertainty.

We provide technical, professional, construction, and O&M services to clients operating inaffected by a number of sectorsfactors, such as market conditions or governmental and industries, including oilenvironmental approvals. Since a significant portion of our revenues is generated from such projects, our results of operations and gas exploration, production, and refining; programs for various national governments, includingcash flows can fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter depending on the U.S. federal government; chemicals and polymers; mining and minerals; pharmaceuticals and biotechnology; infrastructure; buildings; power; and other general industrial and consumer businesses and markets (such as technology and manufacturing; pulp and paper; and food and consumer products). These sectors and industriestiming of our contract awards and the resulting demand for our services have been, and we expect will continue to be, cyclical andcommencement or progress of work under awarded contracts. Furthermore, many of these contracts are subject to significant fluctuations duefinancing contingencies and, as a result, we are subject to a variety of factors beyond our control, including economic conditions and changes in client spending, particularly during periods of economic or political uncertainty.

Current global economic and political conditions have negatively impactedthe risk that the customer will not be able to secure the necessary financing for the project.

In addition, many of our clients’ ability and willingnesscontracts require us to fund their projects, including their abilitysatisfy specific progress or performance milestones in order to raise capital and pay,receive payment from the customer. As a result, we may incur significant costs for engineering, materials, components, equipment, labor or timely pay, our invoices. They have also caused our clientssubcontractors prior to reduce their capital expenditures, alter the mixreceipt of services purchased, seek more favorable price and other contract terms, and otherwise slow their spending on our services. For example, in the public sector, declines in state and local tax revenues as well as other economic declines may result in lower state and local government spending. In addition, due to these conditions manypayment from a customer.
The uncertainty of our competitorscontract award timing can also present difficulties in matching workforce size with contract needs. In some cases, we maintain and bear the cost of a ready workforce that is larger than necessary under existing contracts in anticipation of future workforce needs for expected contract awards. If an expected contract award is delayed or not received, we may be more inclined to take greaterincur additional costs resulting from reductions in staff or unusual risks or accept terms and conditions in contracts that we might not deem acceptable. These conditions have reduced, and may continue to reduce, the demand for our services,redundancy of facilities, which has had, and may continue tocould have a significant negative impactmaterial adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Page 15


Current economic

We engage in a highly competitive business. If we are unable to compete effectively, we could lose market share and political conditions also make it extremely difficultour business and results of operations could be negatively impacted.
We face intense competition to provide technical, professional and construction management services to clients. The markets we serve are highly competitive and we compete against a large number of regional, national and multinational companies. The extent and type of our competition varies by industry, geographic area and project type.
Our projects are frequently awarded through a competitive bidding process, which is standard in our industry. We are constantly competing for project awards based on pricing, schedule and the breadth and technical sophistication of our clients,services. Competition can place downward pressure on our vendors,contract prices and profit margins, which may force us to accurately forecastaccept contractual terms and plan future business activities. We cannot predictconditions that are less favorable to us, thereby increasing the timing, strength or duration of any economic recovery or downturn worldwide or in our clients’ markets. In addition, our business has traditionally lagged recoveriesrisk that, among other things, we may not realize profit margins at the same rates as we have seen in the general economy and, therefore,past or may become responsible for costs or other liabilities we have not recover as quickly asaccepted in the economy at large. A continuationpast. If we are unable to compete effectively, we may experience a loss of market share or worsening of current weak economic conditions, a failure to obtain expected benefits from any increased infrastructure spending,reduced profitability or a reduction in government spendingboth, which if significant, could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, if a significant portion
The nature of our clients or projectscontracts, particularly those that are concentrated in a specific geographic area or industry, our business may be disproportionately affected by negative trends or economic downturns in those specific geographic areas or industries.

Regardless of economic or market conditions, investment decisions by our customers may vary by location or as a result of other factors like the availability of labor or relative construction cost. Because we are dependent on the timing and funding of new awards, we are therefore vulnerable to changes in our clients’ markets and investment decisions. As a result, our past results have varied and may continue to vary depending upon the demand for future projects in the markets and the locations in which we operate.

Fluctuations in commodity prices may affect our customers’ investment decisions and therefore subjectfixed-price, subjects us to risks of cancellation,cost overruns. We may experience reduced profits or, in some cases, losses if costs increase above budgets or estimates or if the project experiences schedule delays.

For fiscal 2020, approximately 24% of our revenues were earned under fixed-price contracts. Both fixed-price and many cost reimbursable contracts require us to estimate the total cost of the project in advance of our performance. For fixed-price contracts, we may benefit from any cost-savings, but we bear greater risk of paying some, if not all, of any cost overruns. Fixed-price contracts are established in part on partial or incomplete designs, cost and scheduling estimates that are based on a number of assumptions, including those about future economic conditions, commodity and other materials pricing and availability of labor, equipment and materials and other exigencies. If the
Page 32


design or the estimates prove inaccurate or if circumstances change due to, among other things, unanticipated technical problems, difficulties in obtaining permits or approvals, changes in local laws or labor conditions, weather or other delays beyond our control, changes in existing work,the costs of equipment or raw materials, our vendors’ or subcontractors’ inability or failure to perform, or changes in general economic conditions, then cost overruns may occur and we could experience reduced profits or, in some cases, a loss for that project. These risks are exacerbated for projects with long-term durations because there is an increased risk that the timing and funding of new awards.

Commodity prices can affectcircumstances on which we based our customersoriginal estimates will change in a number of ways. For example, for those customersmanner that produce commodity products such as oil, gas, copper,increases costs. If the project is significant, or fertilizers, fluctuations in price can have a direct effect on their profitability and cash flow and, therefore, their willingness to continue to investthere are one or make new capital investments. Furthermore, declines in commodity prices can negativelymore issues that impact our business in regions whose economies are substantially dependent on commodity prices, such as the Middle East. To the extent commodity prices decline or fluctuate and our customers defer new investments or cancel or delay existingmultiple projects, the demand for our services decreases, which may have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Commodity prices can also strongly affect the costs of projects. Rising commodity prices can negatively impact the potential returns on investments that are planned, as well as those in progress, and result in customers deferring new investments or canceling or delaying existing projects. Cancellations and delays have affected our past results and may continue to do so in significant and unpredictable ways andoverruns could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our contracts that are fundamentally cost reimbursable in nature may also present a risk to the extent the final cost on a project exceeds the amount the customer expected or budgeted. Like fixed-price contracts, the expected cost of cost-reimbursable projects are based in part on partial design and our estimates of the resources and time necessary to perform such contracts. A portion of the fee is often linked to these estimates and the related final cost and schedule objectives, and if for whatever reason these objectives are not met, the project may be less profitable than we expect or even result in losses.
The loss of or a significant reduction in business from one or a few customers could have a material adverse impact on us.
A few clients have in the past and may in the future account for a significant portion of our revenue and/or backlog in any one year or over a period of several consecutive years. For example, in fiscal 2020, 2019 and 2018, approximately 33%, 27% and 32%, respectively, of our revenue was earned directly or indirectly from agencies of the U.S. federal government. Although we have long-standing relationships with many of our significant clients, our clients may unilaterally reduce, delay or cancel their contracts at any time. Our loss of or a significant reduction in business from a significant client could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The contracts in our backlog may be adjusted, canceled or suspended by our clients and, therefore, our backlog is not necessarily indicative of our future revenues or earnings. Additionally, even if fully performed, our backlog is not a good indicator of our future gross margins.
Backlog represents the total dollar amount of revenues we expect to record in the future as a result of performing work under contracts that have been awarded to us. As of the end of fiscal 2020, our backlog totaled approximately $23.8 billion. There is no assurance that backlog will actually be realized as revenues in the amounts reported or, if realized, will result in profits. In accordance with industry practice, substantially all of our contracts are subject to cancellation, termination, or suspension at the discretion of the client, including our U.S. government work. In the event of a project cancellation, we would generally have no contractual right to the total revenue reflected in our backlog. Projects can remain in backlog for extended periods of time because of the nature of the project and the timing of the particular services required by the project. The risk of contracts in backlog being canceled or suspended generally increases during periods of widespread economic slowdowns or in response to changes in commodity prices.
The contracts in our backlog are subject to changes in the scope of services to be provided as well as adjustments to the costs relating to the contracts. The revenue for certain contracts included in backlog is based on estimates. Additionally, the way we perform on our individual contracts can affect greatly our gross margins and hence, future profitability.
In some markets, there is a continuing trend towards cost-reimbursable contracts with incentive-fee arrangements. Typically, our incentive fees are based on such things as achievement of target completion dates or target costs, overall safety performance, overall client satisfaction and other performance criteria. If we fail to meet such targets or achieve the expected performance standards, we may receive a lower, or even zero, incentive fee resulting in lower gross margins. Accordingly, there is no assurance that the contracts in backlog, assuming they produce the revenues currently expected, will generate gross margins at the rates we have realized in the past.
Contracts with the U.S. federal government and other governments and their agencies pose additional risks relating to future funding and compliance.
Contracts with the U.S. federal government and other governments and their agencies, which are a significant source of our revenue and profit, are subject to various uncertainties, restrictions, and regulations including oversight
Page 33


audits by various government authorities as well as profit and cost controls, which could result in withholding or delay of payments to us. Government contracts are also exposed to uncertainties associated with funding such as sequestration and budget deficits. Contracts with the U.S. federal government, for example, are subject to the uncertainties of Congressional funding. U.S. government shutdowns or any related under-staffing of the government departments or agencies that interact with our business could result in program cancellations, disruptions and/or stop work orders, could limit the government’s ability to effectively progress programs and make timely payments, and could limit our ability to perform on our existing U.S. government contracts and successfully compete for new work. Governments are typically under no obligation to maintain funding at any specific level, and funds for government programs may even be eliminated. Legislatures typically appropriate funds on a year-by-year basis, while contract performance may take more than one year. As a result, contracts with government agencies may be only partially funded or may be terminated, and we may not realize all of the potential revenue and profit from those contracts.
Our government clients may reduce the scope of or terminate our contracts for convenience or decide not to renew our contracts with little or no prior notice. Since government contracts represent a significant percentage of our revenues (for example, those with the U.S. federal government represented approximately 33% of our total revenue in fiscal 2020), a significant reduction in government funding or the loss of such contracts could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Most government contracts are awarded through a rigorous competitive process. The U.S. federal government has increasingly relied upon multiple-year contracts with multiple contractors that generally require those contractors to engage in an additional competitive bidding process for each task order issued under a contract. This process may result in us facing significant additional pricing pressure and uncertainty and incurring additional costs. Moreover, we may not be awarded government contracts because of existing policies designed to protect small businesses and under-represented minorities. Our inability to win new contracts or be awarded work under existing contracts could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, government contracts are subject to specific procurement regulations and a variety of other socio-economic requirements, which affect how we transact business with our clients and, in some instances, impose additional costs on our business operations. For example, for contracts with the U.S. federal government, we must comply with the Federal Acquisition Regulation, the Truth in Negotiations Act, the Cost Accounting Standards, and numerous regulations governing environmental protection and employment practices. Government contracts also contain terms that expose us to heightened levels of risk and potential liability than non-government contracts. This includes, for example, unlimited indemnification obligations.
We also are subject to government audits, investigations, and proceedings. For example, government agencies such as the U.S. Defense Contract Audit Agency routinely review and audit us to determine the adequacy of and our compliance with our internal control systems and policies and whether allowable costs are in accordance with applicable regulations. These audits can result in a determination that a rule or regulation has been violated or that adjustments are necessary to the amount of contract costs we believe are reimbursable by the agencies and the amount of our overhead costs allocated to the agencies.
If we violate a rule or regulation, fail to comply with a contractual or other requirement or do not satisfy an audit, a variety of penalties can be imposed on us including monetary damages and criminal and civil penalties. For example, in so-called “qui tam” actions brought by individuals or the government under the U.S. Federal False Claims Act or under similar state and local laws, treble damages can be awarded. In addition, any or all of our government contracts could be terminated, we could be suspended or debarred from all government contract work, or payment of our costs could be disallowed. The occurrence of any of these actions could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Many of our federal government contracts require us to have security clearances, which can be difficult and time consuming to obtain. If our employees or our facilities are unable to obtain or retain the necessary security clearances, our clients could terminate or not renew existing contracts or award us new contracts, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations could be negatively impacted.
Our project execution activities may result in liability for faulty services.

If we fail to provide our services in accordance with applicable professional standards or contractual requirements, we could be exposed to significant monetary damages or even criminal violations. Our engineering practice, for example, involves professional judgments regarding the planning, design, development, construction,
Page 34


operations and management of industrial facilities and public infrastructure projects. While we do not generally accept liability for consequential damages in our contracts, and although we have adopted a range of insurance, risk management and risk avoidance programs designed to reduce potential liabilities, a catastrophic event at one of our project sites or completed projects resulting from the services we have performed could result in significant professional or product liability and warranty or other claims against us as well as reputational harm, especially if public safety is impacted. These liabilities could exceed our insurance limits or the fees we generate, may not be covered by insurance at all due to various exclusions in our coverage and could impact our ability to obtain insurance in the future. Further, even where coverage applies, the policies have deductibles, which result in our assumption of exposure for certain amounts with respect to any claim filed against us. In addition, clients or subcontractors who have agreed to indemnify us against any such liabilities or losses might refuse or be unable to pay us. An uninsured claim, either in part or in whole, as well as any claim covered by insurance but subject to a high deductible, if successful and of a material magnitude, could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We engage in a highly competitive business. If we are unable to compete effectively, we could lose market share and our business and results of operations could be negatively impacted.

We face intense competition to provide technical, professional, and construction services to clients. The markets we serve are highly competitive and we compete against a large number of regional, national, and multinational companies.  

The extent of our competition varies by industry, geographic area, and project type. For example, with respect to our construction, and operations and maintenance services, clients generally award large projects to large contractors, which may

Page 16


give our larger competitors an advantage when bidding for these projects. Conversely, with respect to our engineering, design, architectural, and consulting services, low barriers of entry can result in competition with smaller, newer competitors. The extent and type of competition varies by market and geographic area.

Our projects are frequently awarded through a competitive bidding process, which is standard in our industry. We are constantly competing for project awards based on pricing, schedule and the breadth and technical sophistication of our services. Competition can place downward pressure on our contract prices and profit margins, and may force us to accept contractual terms and conditions that are less favorable to us, thereby increasing the risk that, among other things, we may not realize profit margins at the same rates as we've seen in the past or may become responsible for costs or other liabilities we have not accepted in the past. If we are unable to compete effectively, we may experience a loss of market share or reduced profitability or both, which if significant, could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our results of operations depend on the award of new contracts and the timing of the performance of these contracts.

Our revenues are derived from new contract awards. Delays in the timing of the awards or cancellations of such prospects as a result of economic conditions, material and equipment pricing and availability or other factors could impact our long-term projected results. It is particularly difficult to predict whether or when we will receive large-scale projects as these contracts frequently involve a lengthy and complex bidding and selection process, which is affected by a number of factors, such as market conditions or governmental and environmental approvals. Since a significant portion of our revenues is generated from such projects, our results of operations and cash flows can fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter depending on the timing of our contract awards and the commencement or progress of work under awarded contracts. Furthermore, many of these contracts are subject to financing contingencies and, as a result, we are subject to the risk that the customer will not be able to secure the necessary financing for the project.

In addition, many of our contracts require us to satisfy specific progress or performance milestones in order to receive payment from the customer. As a result, we may incur significant costs for engineering, materials, components, equipment, labor or subcontractors prior to receipt of payment from a customer.

The uncertainty of our contract award timing can also present difficulties in matching workforce size with contract needs. In some cases, we maintain and bear the cost of a ready workforce that is larger than necessary under existing contracts in anticipation of future workforce needs for expected contract awards. If an expected contract award is delayed or not received, we may incur additional costs resulting from reductions in staff or redundancy of facilities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The outcome of pending and future claims and litigation could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We are a party to claims and litigation in the normal course of business.business, including litigation inherited through acquisitions. Since we engage in engineering and construction activities for large facilities and projects where design, construction or systems failures can result in substantial injury or damage to employees or others, we are exposed to substantial claims and litigation and investigations if there is a failure at any such facility or project. Such claims could relate to, among other things, personal injury, loss of life, business interruption, property damage, pollution and environmental damage and be brought by our clients or third parties, such as those who use or reside near our clients’ projects. We can also be exposed to claims if we agreed that a project will achieve certain performance standards or satisfy certain technical requirements and those standards or requirements are not met. In many of our contracts with clients, subcontractors and vendors, we agree to retain or assume potential liabilities for damages, penalties, losses and other exposures relating to projects that could result in claims that greatly exceed the anticipated profits relating to those contracts. In addition, while clients and subcontractors may agree to indemnify us against certain liabilities, such third parties may refuse or be unable to pay us.

    With a workforce of approximately 55,000 people globally, we are also party to labor and employment claims in the normal course of business. Such claims could relate to allegations of harassment and discrimination, pay equity, denial of benefits, wage and hour violations, whistleblower protections, concerted protected activity, and other employment protections, and may be pursued on an individual or class action basis depending on applicable laws and regulations. Some of such claims may be insurable, while other such claims may not.
We maintain insurance coverage for various aspects of our business and operations. Our insurance programs have varying coverage limits as well as exclusions for matters such as fraud, and insurance companies may attempt to deny claims for which we seek coverage. In addition, we have elected to retain a portion of losses that may occur through the use of various deductibles, retentions and limits under these programs. As a result, we may be subject to future liability for which we are only partially insured, or completely uninsured.

Although in the past we have been generally able to cover our insurance needs, there can be no assurances that we can secure all necessary or appropriate insurance in the future, or that such insurance can be economically secured. For example,

Page 17


catastrophic events can result in decreased coverage limits, coverage that is more limited, or increased premium costs or higher deductibles. We monitor the financial health of the insurance companies from which we procure insurance, and thiswhich is one of the factors we take into account when purchasing insurance. Our insurance is purchased from a number of the world's leading providers, often in layered insurance or quota share arrangements. If any of our third party insurers fail, abruptly cancel our coverage or otherwise cannot satisfy their insurance requirements to us, then our overall risk exposure and operational expenses could be increased and our business operations could be interrupted.

In addition, the nature of our business sometimes results in clients, subcontractors and vendors presenting claims to us for, among other things, recovery of costs related to certain projects. Similarly, we occasionally present change orders and claims to our clients, subcontractors and vendors for, among other things, additional costs exceeding the original contract price. If we fail to document properly the nature of our claims and change orders or are otherwise unsuccessful in negotiating reasonable settlements with our clients, subcontractors and vendors, we could incur cost overruns, reduced profits or, in some cases, a loss for a project. Further, these claims can be the subject of lengthy negotiations, arbitration or litigation proceedings, which could result in the investment of significant amounts
Page 35


of working capital pending the resolution of the relevant change orders and claims. A failure to promptly recover on these types of claims could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity and financial results. Additionally, irrespective of how well we document the nature of our claims and change orders, the cost to prosecute and defend claims and change orders can be significant.

Litigation and regulatory proceedings are subject to inherent uncertainties and unfavorable rulings can and do occur. Pending or future claims against us could result in professional liability, product liability, criminal liability, warranty obligations, default under our credit agreements and other liabilities which, to the extent we are not insured against a loss or our insurer fails to provide coverage, could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The nature of our contracts, particularly those that are fixed-price, subject us to risks of cost overruns. We may experience reduced profits or, in some cases, losses if costs increase above budgets or estimates or if the project experiences schedule delays.

For fiscal 2017, approximately 19% of our revenues were earned under fixed-price contracts. Both fixed-price and many cost reimbursable contracts require us to estimate the total cost of the project in advance of our performance. For fixed-price contracts, we may benefit from any cost-savings, but we bear greater risk of paying some, if not all, of any cost overruns. Fixed-price contracts are established in part on partial or incomplete designs, cost and scheduling estimates that are based on a number of assumptions, including those about future economic conditions, commodity and other materials pricing and availability of labor, equipment and materials, and other exigencies. If the design or the estimates prove inaccurate or if circumstances change due to, among other things, unanticipated technical problems, difficulties in obtaining permits or approvals, changes in local laws or labor conditions, weather or other delays beyond our control, changes in the costs of equipment or raw materials, our vendors’ or subcontractors’ inability or failure to perform, or changes in general economic conditions, then cost overruns may occur and we could experience reduced profits or, in some cases, a loss for that project. These risks are exacerbated for projects with long-term durations because there is an increased risk that the circumstances on which we based our original estimates will change in a manner that increases costs. If the project is significant, or there are one or more issues that impact multiple projects, costs overruns could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our contracts that are fundamentally cost reimbursable in nature may also present a risk to the extent the final cost on a project exceeds the amount the customer expected or budgeted. Like fixed-price contracts, the expected cost of cost-reimbursable projects are based in part on partial design and our estimates of the resources and time necessary to perform such contracts. A portion of the fee is often linked to the final cost and schedule objectives and if for whatever reason, the project may be less profitable than we expect or even result in losses.

Our continued success is dependent upon our ability to hire, retain, and utilize qualified personnel.

The success of our business is dependent upon our ability to hire, retain, and utilize qualified personnel, including engineers, architects, designers, craft personnel, and corporate management professionals who have the required experience and expertise at a reasonable cost. The market for these and other personnel is competitive. From time to time, it may be difficult to attract and retain qualified individuals with the expertise, and in the timeframe, demanded by our clients, or to replace such personnel when needed in a timely manner. In certain geographic areas, for example, we may not be able to satisfy the demand for our services because of our inability to successfully hire and retain qualified personnel. Furthermore, some of our personnel hold government granted clearance that may be required to obtain government projects. If we were to

Page 18


lose some or all of these personnel, they would be difficult to replace. Loss of the services of, or failure to recruit, qualified technical and management personnel could limit our ability to successfully complete existing projects and compete for new projects.

In addition, in the event that any of our key personnel retire or otherwise leave the Company, we need to have appropriate succession plans in place and to successfully implement such plans, which requires devoting time and resources toward identifying and integrating new personnel into leadership roles and other key positions. If we cannot attract and retain qualified personnel or effectively implement appropriate succession plans, it could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The cost of providing our services, including the extent to which we utilize our workforce, affects our profitability. For example, the uncertainty of contract award timing can present difficulties in matching our workforce size with our contracts. If an expected contract award is delayed or not received, we could incur costs resulting from excess staff, reductions in staff, or redundancy of facilities that could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial conditions, and results of operations.

The contracts in our backlog may be adjusted, cancelled or suspended by our clients and, therefore, our backlog is not necessarily indicative of our future revenues or earnings. Additionally, even if fully performed, our backlog is not a good indicator of our future gross margins.

Backlog represents the total dollar amount of revenues we expect to record in the future as a result of performing work under contracts that have been awarded to us. As of the end of fiscal 2017, our backlog totaled approximately $19.8 billion. There is no assurance that backlog will actually be realized as revenues in the amounts reported or, if realized, will result in profits. In accordance with industry practice, substantially all of our contracts are subject to cancellation, termination, or suspension at the discretion of the client. In the event of a project cancellation, we would generally have no contractual right to the total revenue reflected in our backlog. Projects can remain in backlog for extended periods of time because of the nature of the project and the timing of the particular services required by the project. The risk of contracts in backlog being cancelled or suspended generally increases during periods of widespread economic slowdowns or in response to changes in commodity prices.

The contracts in our backlog are subject to changes in the scope of services to be provided as well as adjustments to the costs relating to the contracts. The revenue for certain contracts included in backlog is based on estimates. Additionally, the way we perform on our individual contracts can affect greatly our gross margins and hence, future profitability.

In some markets, there is a continuing trend towards cost-reimbursable contracts with incentive-fee arrangements. Typically, our incentive fees are based on such things as achievement of target completion dates or target costs, overall safety performance, overall client satisfaction, and other performance criteria. If we fail to meet such targets or achieve the expected performance standards, we may receive a lower, or even zero, incentive fee resulting in lower gross margins. Accordingly, there is no assurance that the contracts in backlog, assuming they produce the revenues currently expected, will generate gross margins at the rates we have realized in the past.

Contracts with the U.S. federal government and other governments and their agencies pose additional risks relating to future funding and compliance.

Contracts with the U.S. federal government and other governments and their agencies, which are a significant source of our revenue and profit, are subject to various uncertainties, restrictions, and regulations including oversight audits by various government authorities as well as profit and cost controls, which could result in withholding or delay of payments to us. Government contracts are also exposed to uncertainties associated with funding such as sequestration and budget deficits. Contracts with the U.S. federal government, for example, are subject to the uncertainties of Congressional funding. Governments are typically under no obligation to maintain funding at any specific level, and funds for government programs may even be eliminated. Legislatures typically appropriate funds on a year-by-year basis, while contract performance may take more than one year. As a result, contracts with government agencies may be only partially funded or may be terminated, and we may not realize all of the potential revenue and profit from those contracts.

Our government clients may reduce the scope or terminate our contracts for convenience or decide not to renew our contracts with little or no prior notice. Since government contracts represent a significant percentage of our revenues (for example, those with the U.S. federal government represented approximately 19.2% of our total revenue in fiscal 2017), a

Page 19


significant reduction in government funding or the loss of such contracts could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Most government contracts are awarded through a rigorous competitive process. The U.S. federal government has increasingly relied upon multiple-year contracts with multiple contractors that generally require those contractors to engage in an additional competitive bidding process for each task order issued under a contract. This process may result in us facing significant additional pricing pressure and uncertainty and incurring additional costs. Moreover, we may not be awarded government contracts because of existing policies designed to protect small businesses and under-represented minorities. Our inability to win new contracts or be awarded work under existing contracts could have a negative impact on our business and results of operations.

In addition, government contracts are subject to specific procurement regulations and a variety of other socio-economic requirements, which affect how we transact business with our clients and, in some instances, impose additional costs on our business operations. For example, for contracts with the U.S. federal government, we must comply with the Federal Acquisition Regulation, the Truth in Negotiations Act, the Cost Accounting Standards, the Service Contract Act, and numerous regulations governing environmental protection and employment practices. Government contracts also contain terms that expose us to heightened levels of risk and potential liability than non-government contracts. This includes, for example, unlimited indemnification obligations.

We also are subject to government audits, investigations, and proceedings. For example, government agencies such as the U.S. Defense Contract Audit Agency routinely review and audit us to determine the adequacy of and our compliance with our internal control systems and policies and whether allowable costs are in accordance with applicable regulations. These audits can result in a determination that a rule or regulation has been violated or that adjustments are necessary to the amount of contract costs we believe are reimbursable by the agencies and the amount of our overhead costs allocated to the agencies.

If we violate a rule or regulation, fail to comply with a contractual or other requirement or do not satisfy an audit, a variety of penalties can be imposed on us including monetary damages and criminal and civil penalties. For example, in so-called “qui tam” actions brought by individuals or the government under the U.S. Federal False Claims Act or under similar state and local laws, treble damages can be awarded. In addition, any or all of our government contracts could be terminated, we could be suspended or debarred from all government contract work, or payment of our costs could be disallowed. The occurrence of any of these actions could harm our reputation and our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be negatively impacted.

Many of our federal government contracts require us to have security clearances, which can be difficult and time consuming to obtain. If our employees are unable to obtain or retain the necessary securities clearances, our clients could terminate or not renew existing contracts or award us new contracts. To the extent this occurs, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be negatively impacted.

Our use of joint ventures and partnerships exposes us to risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside of our control.

As is common in our industry, we perform certain contracts as a member of joint ventures, partnerships, and similar arrangements. This situation exposes us to a number of risks, including the risk that our partners may be unable to fulfill their obligations to us or our clients.

Further, we have limited ability to control the actions of our joint venture partners, including with respect to nonperformance, default, bankruptcy or legal or regulatory compliance. Our partners may be unable or unwilling to provide the required levels of financial support to the partnerships. If these circumstances occur, we may be liable for claims and losses attributable to the partner by operation of law or contract. These circumstances could also lead to disputes and litigation with our partners or clients, all of which could have a material adverse impact on our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.

We depend on the management effectiveness of our joint venture partners. Differences in views among the joint venture participants may result in delayed decisions or in failures to agree on major issues, which could materially affect the business and operations of these ventures. In addition, in many of the countries in which we engage in joint ventures, it may be difficult to enforce our contractual rights under the applicable joint venture agreement. If we are not able to enforce our contractual rights, we may not be able to realize the benefits of the joint venture or we may be subject to additional liabilities.

Page 20


We participate in joint ventures and similar arrangements in which we are not the controlling partner. In these cases, we have limited control over the actions of the joint venture. These joint ventures may not be subject to the same requirements regarding internal controls and internal control over financial reporting that we follow. To the extent the controlling partner makes decisions that negatively impact the joint venture or internal control problems arise within the joint venture, it could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The failure by a joint venture partner to comply with applicable laws, regulations or client requirements could negatively impact our business and, for government clients, could result in fines, penalties, suspension or even debarment being imposed on us, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are dependent on third parties to complete many of our contracts.

Third-party subcontractors we hire perform mucha significant amount of the work performed under our contracts. We also rely on third-party equipment manufacturers or suppliers to provide much of the equipment and materials used for projects. If we are unable to hire qualified subcontractors or find qualified equipment manufacturers or suppliers, our ability to successfully complete a project could be impaired. If we are not able to locate qualified third-party subcontractors or the amount we are required to pay for subcontractors or equipment and supplies exceeds what we have estimated, especially in a lump sum or a fixed-price contract, we may suffer losses on these contracts. If a subcontractor, supplier, or manufacturer fails to provide services, supplies or equipment as required under a contract for any reason, we may be required to source these services, equipment or supplies to other third parties on a delayed basis or on less favorable terms, which could impact contract profitability. There is a risk that we may have disputes with our subcontractors relating to, among other things, the quality and timeliness of work performed, customer concerns about the subcontractor, or our failure to extend existing task orders or issue new task orders under a contract. In addition, faulty workmanship, equipment or materials could impact the overall project, resulting in claims against us for failure to meet required project specifications.

Page 36


In the currentan uncertain or downturn economic environment, third parties may find it difficult to obtain sufficient financing to help fund their operations. The inability to obtain financing could adversely affect a third party’s ability to provide materials, equipment or services which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, a failure by a third party subcontractor, supplier or manufacturer to comply with applicable laws, regulations or client requirements could negatively impact our business and, for government clients, could result in fines, penalties, suspension or even debarment being imposed on us, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Negative conditions in the credit and financial markets and delays in receiving client payments could result in liquidity problems, adversely affecting our cost of borrowing and our business.

Although we finance much of our operations using cash provided by operations, at times we depend on the availability of credit to grow our business and to help fund business acquisitions. Instability in the credit markets in the U.S. or abroad could cause the availability of credit to be relatively difficult or expensive to obtain at competitive rates, on commercially reasonable terms or in sufficient amounts. This situation could make it more difficult or more expensive for us to access funds, refinance our existing indebtedness, enter into agreements for new indebtedness, or obtain funding through the issuance of securities or such additional capital may not be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all. We may also enter into business acquisition agreements that require us to access credit, which if not available at the closing of the acquisition could result in a breach of the acquisition agreement and a resulting claim for damages by the sellers of such business. In addition, market conditions could negatively impact our clients’ ability to fund their projects and, therefore, utilize our services, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

In addition, we are subject to the risk that the counterparties to our credit agreements may go bankrupt if they suffer catastrophic demand on their liquidity that will prevent them from fulfilling their contractual obligations to us. We also routinely enter into contracts with counterparties including vendors, suppliers, and subcontractors that may be negatively impacted by events in the credit markets. If those counterparties are unable to perform their obligations to us or our clients, we may be required to provide additional services or make alternate arrangements on less favorable terms with other parties to ensure adequate performance and delivery of services to our clients. These circumstances could also lead to disputes and litigation with our partners or clients, which could have a material adverse impact on our reputation, business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Page 21


Some of our customers, suppliers and subcontractors depend on access to commercial financing and capital markets to fund their operations. Disruptions of the credit or capital markets could adversely affect our clients’ ability to finance projects and could result in contract cancellations or suspensions, project delays and payment delays or defaults by our clients. In addition, clients may be unable to fund new projects, may choose to make fewer capital expenditures or otherwise slow their spending on our services or to seek contract terms more favorable to them. Our government clients may face budget deficits that prohibit them from funding proposed and existing projects or that cause them to exercise their right to terminate our contracts with little or no prior notice. In addition, any financial difficulties suffered by our subcontractors or suppliers could increase our cost or adversely impact project schedules. These disruptions could materially impact our backlog and have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

In addition, we typically bill our clients for our services in arrears and are, therefore, subject to our clients delaying or failing to pay our invoices after we have already committed resources to their projects. In weak economic environments, we may experience increased delays and failures due to, among other reasons, our clients’ unwillingness to pay for alleged poor performance or to preserve their own working capital. If one or more clients delays in paying or fails to pay us a significant amount of our outstanding receivables, it could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations.

Furthermore, our cash balances and short-term investments are maintained in accounts held by major banks and financial institutions located primarily in North America, Europe, South America, Australia and Asia. Some of our accounts hold deposits in amounts that exceed available insurance. Although none of the financial institutions in which we hold our cash and investments have gone into bankruptcy or forced receivership, or have been seized by their governments, there is a risk that such events may occur in the future. If any such events were to occur, we would be at risk of not being able to access our cash, which may result in a temporary liquidity crisis that could impede our ability to fund our operations, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Maintaining adequate bonding and letter of credit capacity is necessary for us to successfully bid on and win some contracts.

In line with industry practice, we are often required to provide performance or payment bonds or letters of credit to our customers. These instruments indemnify the customer should we fail to perform our obligations under the contract. If a bond or a letter of credit is required for a particular project and we are unable to obtain an appropriate bond or letter of credit, we cannot pursue that project. Historically, we have had adequate bonding and letter of credit capacity but, as is typically the case, the issuance of a bond is at the surety’s sole discretion and the issuance of a letter of credit is based on the Company's credit-worthiness. Because of an overall lack of worldwide bonding capacity, we may find it difficult to find sureties who will provide required levels of bonding or such bonding may only be available at significant additional cost. There can be no assurance that our bonding capacity will continue to be available to us on reasonable terms. In addition, future projects may require us to obtain letters of credit that extend beyond the term of our existing credit facilities. Our inability to obtain adequate bonding and, as a result, to bid on new contracts that require such bonding or letter of credit could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Past and future environmental, heath, and safety laws could impose significant additional costs and liabilities.

We are subject to a variety of environmental, health, and safety laws and regulations governing, among other things, discharges to air and water, the handling, storage, and disposal of hazardous or waste materials and the remediation of contamination associated with the releases of hazardous substances and human health and safety. These laws and regulations and the risk of attendant litigation can cause significant delays to a project and add significantly to its cost. Violations of these regulations could subject us and our management to civil and criminal penalties and other liabilities.

Various U.S. federal, state, local, and foreign environmental laws and regulations may impose liability for property damage and costs of investigation and cleanup of hazardous or toxic substances on property currently or previously owned by us or arising out of our waste management or environmental remediation activities. These laws may impose responsibility and liability without regard to knowledge of or causation of the presence of contaminants. The liability under these laws is joint and several. We have potential liabilities associated with our past waste management and other activities and with our current and prior ownership of various properties. The discovery of additional contaminants or the imposition of unforeseen clean-up obligations at these or other sites could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Page 22


When we perform our services, our personnel and equipment may be exposed to radioactive and hazardous materials and conditions. We may be subject to liability claims by employees, customers, and third parties as a result of such exposures. In addition, we may be subject to fines, penalties or other liabilities arising under environmental or safety laws. A claim, if not covered or only partially covered by insurance, could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

Health safety, and environmental laws and regulations and policies are reviewed periodically and any changes thereto could affect us in substantial and unpredictable ways. Such changes could, for example, relax or repeal laws and regulations relating to the environment, which could result in a decline in the demand for our environmental services and, in turn, could negatively impact our revenue. Changes in the environmental laws and regulations, remediation obligations, enforcement actions, stricter interpretations of existing requirements, future discovery of contamination or claims for damages to persons, property, natural resources or the environment could result in material costs and liabilities that we currently do not anticipate. If we fail to comply with any environmental, health, or safety laws or regulations, whether actual or alleged, we could be exposed to fines, penalties or potential litigation liabilities, including costs, settlements and judgments, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, we and many of our clients operate in highly regulated environments, which may require us or our clients to obtain, and to comply with, federal, state, and local government permits and approvals. Any of these permits or approvals may be subject to denial, revocation or modification under various circumstances. Failure to obtain or comply with, or the loss or modification of, the conditions of permits or approvals may subject us to penalties or other liabilities, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and result of operations.

If we fail to comply with federal, state, local or foreign governmental requirements, our business may be adversely affected.

We are subject to U.S. federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations that affect our business. For example, our global operations require importing and exporting goods and technology across international borders which requires full compliance with both Export Regulatory Laws and International Trafficking in Arms Regulations (“ITAR”). Although we have policies and procedures to comply with U.S. and foreign international trade laws, the violation of such laws could subject the Company and its employees to civil or criminal penalties, including substantial monetary fines, or other adverse actions including denial of import or export privileges or debarment from participation in U.S. government contracts, and could damage our reputation and our ability to do business.

Employee, agent or partner misconduct or our overall failure to comply with laws or regulations could weaken our ability to win contracts, which could result in reduced revenues and profits.

Misconduct, fraud, non-compliance with applicable laws and regulations, or other improper activities by one of our employees, agents or partners could have a significant negative impact on our business and reputation. Such misconduct could include the failure to comply with government procurement regulations, regulations regarding the protection of classified information, regulations prohibiting bribery and other corrupt practices, regulations regarding the pricing of labor and other costs in government contracts, regulations on lobbying or similar activities, regulations pertaining to the internal controls over financial reporting, regulations pertaining to export control, environmental laws, employee wages, pay and benefits, and any other applicable laws or regulations. For example, we routinely provide services that may be highly sensitive or that relate to critical national security matters; if a security breach were to occur, our ability to procure future government contracts could be severely limited. The precautions we take to prevent and detect these activities may not be effective and we could face unknown risks or losses. Our failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations, or acts of misconduct, could subject us to fines and penalties, cancellation of contracts, loss of security clearance and suspension or debarment from contracting, which could weaken our ability to win contracts and result in reduced revenues and profits and could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws.

The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010, and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws, including the requirements to maintain accurate information and internal controls. We operate in many parts of the world that have experienced governmental corruption to some degree and in certain circumstances; strict compliance with anti-bribery laws may conflict

Page 23


with local customs and practices. Despite our training and compliance programs, there is no assurance that our internal control policies and procedures will protect us from acts committed by our employees or agents. If we are found to be liable for FCPA or other violations (either due to our own acts or our inadvertence, or due to the acts or inadvertence of others), we could suffer from civil and criminal penalties or other sanctions, including contract cancellations or debarment, and loss of reputation, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The loss of or a significant reduction in business from one or a few customers could have a material adverse impact on us.

A few clients have in the past and may in the future account for a significant portion of our revenue and/or backlog in any one year or over a period of several consecutive years. For example, in fiscal 2017, 2016, and 2015, approximately 19.2%, 21.4% and 21.7%, respectively, of our revenue was earned directly or indirectly from agencies of the U.S. federal government. Although we have long-standing relationships with many of our significant clients, our clients may unilaterally reduce, delay, or cancel their contracts at any time. Our loss of or a significant reduction in business from a significant client could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our international operations are exposed to additional risks and uncertainties, including unfavorable political developments and weak foreign economies.

For fiscal 2017,2020, approximately 42% of 25% of our revenue was earned from clients outside the U.S. Our business is dependent on the continued success of our international operations, and we expect our international operations to continue to account for a significant portion of our total revenues. Our international operations are subject to a variety of risks, including:

Recessions and other economic crises in other regions, such as Europe, or specific foreign economies and the impact on our costs of doing business in those countries;

Difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations, including logistical and communication challenges;

Unexpected changes in foreign government policies and regulatory requirements;

Potential non-compliance with a wide variety of laws and regulations, including anti-corruption, export control and anti-boycott laws and similar non-U.S. laws and regulations;

Potential non-compliance with regulations and evolving industry standards regarding consumer protection and data use and security, including the General Data Protection Regulation approved by the European Union;

Lack of developed legal systems to enforce contractual rights;

Expropriation and nationalization of our assets in a foreign country;

Renegotiation or nullification of our existing contracts;

The adoption of new, and the expansion of existing, trade or other restrictions;

Embargoes, duties, tariffs or other trade restrictions, including sanctions;

Changes in labor conditions;

Acts of war, civil unrest, force majeure, and terrorism;

The ability to finance efficiently our foreign operations;

Social, political, and economic instability;

Page 37


Expropriation of property;

Changes to tax policy;

Tax increases;

Currency exchangesexchange rate fluctuations;

Limitations on the ability to repatriate foreign earnings; and

U.S. government policy changes in relation to the foreign countries in which we operate.

The lack of a well-developed legal system in some of these countries may make it difficult to enforce our contractual rights. In addition, military action, geopolitical shifts or continued unrest, particularly in the Middle East, could impact the supply or pricing of oil, disrupt our operations in the region and elsewhere and increase our security costs. To the extent our international operations are affected by unexpected or adverse economic, political and other conditions, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

Page 24


We work in international locations where there are high security risks, which could result in harm to our employees or unanticipated cost.

Some of our services are performed in high-risk locations, where the country or location is subject to political, social or economic risks, or war, terrorism or civil unrest. In those locations where we have employees or operations, we may expend significant efforts and incur substantial security costs to maintain the safety of our personnel. Despite these activities, in these locations, we cannot guarantee the safety of our personnel and we may suffer future losses of employees and subcontractors. Acts of terrorism and threats of armed conflicts in or around various areas in which we operate could limit or disrupt markets and our operations, including disruptions resulting from the evacuation of personnel, cancellation of contracts, or the loss of key employees, contractors or assets.

Cyber security or privacy breaches, or systems and information technology interruption or failure could adversely impact our ability to operate or expose us to significant financial losses and reputational harm.
We rely heavily on computer, information and communications technology and related systems in order to properly operate our business. From time to time, we experience occasional system interruptions and delays. In the event we are unable to regularly deploy software and hardware, effectively upgrade our systems and network infrastructure and take other steps to maintain or improve the efficiency and efficacy of our systems, the operation of such systems could be interrupted or result in the loss, corruption, or release of data. In addition, our computer and communication systems and operations could be damaged or interrupted by natural disasters, force majeure events, telecommunications failures, power loss, acts of war or terrorism, computer viruses, malicious code, physical or electronic security breaches, intentional or inadvertent user misuse or error or similar events or disruptions. Any of these or other events could cause interruptions, delays, loss of critical and/or sensitive data or similar effects, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, protection of intellectual property and results of operations, as well as those of our clients.
In addition, we face the threat to our computer systems of unauthorized access, computer hackers, computer viruses, malicious code, ransomware, phishing, organized cyber-attacks and other security problems and system disruptions, including possible unauthorized access to and disclosure of our and our clients’ proprietary or classified information. In addition, such tactics may also seek to cause payments due to or from the Company to be misdirected to fraudulent accounts, which may not be recoverable by the Company.
While we have security measures and technology in place to protect our and our clients’ proprietary or classified information, if these measures fail as a result of a cyber-attack, other third-party action, employee error, malfeasance or otherwise, and someone obtains unauthorized access to our or our clients’ information, our reputation could be damaged, our business may suffer and we could incur significant liability. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or sabotage systems change frequently and generally are not identified until they are launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. As a result, we may be required to expend significant resources to protect against the threat of system disruptions and security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by these disruptions and breaches. Any of these events could damage our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, new laws and regulations governing data privacy and the unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, including the European Union General Data Protection Regulation and the California Consumer Privacy
Page 38


Act, pose increasingly complex compliance challenges and potentially elevate costs, and any failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in significant penalties and legal liability.
We continuously evaluate the need to upgrade and/or replace our systems and network infrastructure to protect our computing environment, to stay current on vendor supported products and to improve the efficiency of our systems and for other business reasons. The implementation of new systems and information technology could adversely impact our operations by imposing substantial capital expenditures, demands on management time and risks of delays or difficulties in transitioning to new systems. In addition, our systems implementations may not result in productivity improvements at the levels anticipated. Systems implementation disruption and any other information technology disruption, if not anticipated and appropriately mitigated, could have an adverse effect on our business.
We are subject to professional standards, duties and statutory obligations on professional reports and opinions we issue, which could subject us to monetary damages.
We issue reports and opinions to clients based on our professional engineering expertise as well as our other professional credentials that subject us to professional standards, duties and obligations regulating the performance of our services. For example, we issue opinions and reports to government clients in connection with securities offerings. If a client or another third party alleges that our report or opinion is incorrect or it is improperly relied upon and we are held responsible, we could be subject to significant monetary damages. In addition, our reports and other work product may need to comply with professional standards, licensing requirements, securities regulations and other laws and rules governing the performance of professional services in the jurisdiction where the services are performed. We could be liable to third parties who use or rely upon our reports and other work product even if we are not contractually bound to those third parties. These events could in turn result in monetary damages and penalties.
We may not be able to protect our intellectual property or that of our clients.
Our technology and intellectual property provide us, in certain instances, with a competitive advantage. Although we protect our property through registration, licensing, contractual arrangements, security controls and similar mechanisms, we may not be able to successfully preserve our rights and they could be invalidated, circumvented, challenged or become obsolete. Trade secrets are generally difficult to protect. Our employees and contractors are subject to confidentiality obligations, but this protection may be inadequate to deter or prevent misappropriation of our confidential information and/or infringement of our intellectual property. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries in which we operate do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the U.S. If we are unable to protect and maintain our intellectual property rights or if there are any successful intellectual property challenges or infringement proceedings against us, our ability to differentiate our service offerings could be reduced. Litigation to determine the scope of intellectual property rights, even if ultimately successful, could be costly and could divert leadership’s attention away from other aspects of our business.
We also hold licenses from third parties which may be utilized in our business operations.  If we are no longer able to license such technology on commercially reasonable terms or otherwise, our business and financial performance could be adversely affected.
If our intellectual property rights or work processes become obsolete, we may not be able to differentiate our service offerings and some of our competitors may be able to offer more attractive services to our customers. Our competitors may independently attempt to develop or obtain access to technologies that are similar or superior to our technologies.
Our clients or other third parties may also provide us with their technology and intellectual property. There is a risk we may not sufficiently protect our or their information from improper use or dissemination and, as a result, could be subject to claims and litigation and resulting liabilities, loss of contracts or other consequences that could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we do not have adequate indemnification for our nuclear services, it could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Price-Anderson Nuclear Industries Indemnity Act, commonly called the Price-Anderson Act (“PAA”), is a U.S. federal law, which, among other things, regulates radioactive materials and the nuclear energy industry, including liability and compensation in the event of nuclear related incidents. The PAA provides certain protections and indemnification to nuclear energy plant operators and U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) contractors. The PAA
Page 39


protections and indemnification apply to us as part of our services to the U.S. nuclear energy industry and DOE for new facilities, maintenance, modification, decontamination and decommissioning of nuclear energy, weapons and research facilities.
We offer similar services in other jurisdictions outside the U.S. For those jurisdictions, varying levels of nuclear liability protection is provided by international treaties, and/or domestic laws, such as the Nuclear Liability and Compensation Act of Canada and the Nuclear Installations Act of the United Kingdom, insurance and/or assets of the nuclear installation operators (some of which are backed by governments) as well as under appropriate enforceable contractual indemnifications and hold-harmless provisions. These protections and indemnifications, however, may not cover all of our liability that could arise in the performance of these services. To the extent the PAA or other protections and indemnifications do not apply to our services, the cost of losses associated with liability not covered by the available protections and indemnifications, or by virtue of our loss of business because of these added costs could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our actual results could differ from the estimates and assumptions used to prepare our financial statements.
In preparing our financial statements, our leadership is required under U.S. GAAP to make estimates and assumptions as of the date of the financial statements. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported values of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Areas requiring significant estimates by our leadership include:
Recognition of contract revenue, costs, profit or losses in applying the principles of percentage of completion accounting;
Estimated amounts for expected project losses, warranty costs, contract close-out or other costs;
Recognition of recoveries under contract change orders or claims;
Collectability of billed and unbilled accounts receivable and the need and amount of any allowance for doubtful accounts;
Estimates of other liabilities, including litigation and insurance revenues/reserves and reserves necessary for self-insured risks;
Accruals for estimated liabilities, including litigation reserves;
Valuation of assets acquired, and liabilities, goodwill, and intangible assets assumed, in acquisitions and ongoing assessment of impairment;
Valuation of stock-based compensation;
The determination of liabilities under pension and other post-retirement benefit programs;
Income tax provisions and related valuation allowances; and
Valuation of investment in Worley stock.
Our actual business and financial results could differ from our estimates of such results, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Page 40


An impairment charge on our goodwill or intangible assets could have a material adverse impact on our financial position and results of operations.
Because we have grown in part through acquisitions, goodwill and intangible assets represent a substantial portion of our assets. Under U.S. GAAP, we are required to test goodwill carried in our Consolidated Balance Sheets for possible impairment on an annual basis based upon a fair value approach. We also assess the recoverability of the unamortized balance of our intangible assets when indications of impairment are present based on expected future probability and undiscounted expected cash flows and their contribution to our overall operations. As of October 2, 2020, we had $5.64 billion of goodwill, representing 45.6% of our total assets of $12.35 billion. We have chosen to perform our annual impairment reviews of goodwill at the beginning of the fourth quarter of our fiscal year. We also are required to test goodwill for impairment between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce our enterprise fair value below its book value. These events or circumstances could include a significant change in the business climate, including a significant sustained decline in a reporting unit’s market value, legal factors, operating performance indicators, competition, sale or disposition of a significant portion of our business, potential government actions toward our facilities and other factors.
If our market capitalization drops significantly below the amount of net equity recorded on our balance sheet, it might indicate a decline in our fair value and would require us to further evaluate whether our goodwill has been impaired. If the fair value of our reporting units is less than their carrying value, we could be required to record an impairment charge. The amount of any impairment could be significant and could have a material adverse impact on our financial position and results of operations for the period in which the charge is taken. For a further discussion of goodwill impairment testing, please see Item 7- Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations below.
Impairment of long-lived assets or restructuring activities may require us to record a significant charge to earnings.
Our long-lived assets, including our lease right-of-use assets, equity investments and other, are subject to periodic testing for impairment. Failure to achieve sufficient levels of cash flow at the asset group level could result in impairment of our long-lived assets. Further changes in the business environment could lead to changes in the scope of operations of our business. These changes, including the closure of one or more offices, could result in restructuring and/or asset impairment charges. The COVID-19 pandemic raises the possibility of an extended global economic downturn which increase the risk of long-lived asset impairment charges.
We may be required to contribute additional cash to meet any underfunded benefit obligations associated with retirement and post-retirement benefit plans we manage.
We have various employee benefit plan obligations that require us to make contributions to satisfy, over time, our underfunded benefit obligations, which are generally determined by calculating the projected benefit obligations minus the fair value of plan assets. For example, as of October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019, our defined benefit pension and post-retirement benefit plans were underfunded by $400.4 million and $399.8 million, respectively. See Note 13- Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional disclosure. In the future, our benefit plan obligations may increase or decrease depending on changes in the levels of interest rates, pension plan asset performance and other factors. If we are required to contribute a significant amount of the deficit for underfunded benefit plans, our cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.
Page 41


Negotiations with labor unions and possible work actions could disrupt operations and increase labor costs and operating expenses.
A certain portion of our work force has entered, or may in the future enter, into collective bargaining agreements, which on occasion may require renegotiation. The outcome of future negotiations relating to union representation or collective bargaining agreements may not be favorable to the Company in that they may increase our operating expenses and lower our net income as a result of higher wages or benefit expenses. In addition, negotiations with unions could divert management attention and disrupt operations, which may adversely affect our results of operations. If we are unable to negotiate acceptable collective bargaining agreements, we may have to address the threat of union-initiated work actions, including strikes. Depending on the nature of the threat or the type and duration of any work action, these actions could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Demand for our services is cyclical as the sectors and industries in which our clients operate are impacted by economic downturns, reductions in government or private spending and times of political uncertainty.
    We provide full spectrum technical and professional solutions to clients operating in a number of sectors and industries, including programs for various national governments, including the U.S. federal government; aerospace; automotive; pharmaceuticals and biotechnology; infrastructure; environmental and nuclear; buildings; smart cities; power; water; transportation; telecom and other general industrial and consumer businesses and sectors. These sectors and industries and the resulting demand for our services have been, and we expect will continue to be, cyclical and subject to significant fluctuations due to a variety of factors beyond our control, including economic conditions and changes in client spending, particularly during periods of economic or political uncertainty.
    Uncertain global economic and political conditions may negatively impact our clients’ ability and willingness to fund their projects, including their ability to raise capital and pay, or timely pay, our invoices. They may also cause our clients to reduce their capital expenditures, alter the mix of services purchased, seek more favorable price and other contract terms and otherwise slow their spending on our services. For example, in the public sector, declines in state and local tax revenues as well as other economic declines may result in lower state and local government spending. In addition, under such conditions, many of our competitors may be more inclined to take greater or unusual risks or accept terms and conditions in contracts that we might not deem acceptable. These conditions may reduce the demand for our services, which may have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
    Additionally, uncertain economic and political conditions may make it difficult for our clients, our vendors, and us to accurately forecast and plan future business activities. For example, recent changes to U.S. policies related to global trade and tariffs have resulted in uncertainty surrounding the future of the global economy as well as retaliatory trade measures implemented by other countries. The increasing cost of steel and aluminum may impact client spending. We cannot predict the outcome of these changing trade policies or other unanticipated political conditions, nor can we predict the timing, strength or duration of any economic recovery or downturn worldwide or in our clients’ markets. In addition, our business has traditionally lagged recoveries in the general economy and, therefore, may not recover as quickly as the economy at large. Weak economic conditions, a failure to obtain expected benefits from any increased infrastructure spending, or a reduction in government spending could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, if a significant portion of our clients or projects are concentrated in a specific geographic area or industry, our business may be disproportionately affected by negative trends or economic downturns in those specific geographic areas or industries.
Regardless of economic or market conditions, investment decisions by our customers may vary by location or as a result of other factors like the availability of labor or relative construction cost. Because we are dependent on the timing and funding of new awards, we are therefore vulnerable to changes in our clients’ markets and investment decisions. As a result, our past results have varied and may continue to vary depending upon the demand for future projects in the markets and the locations in which we operate.
Page 42


Our operations may be impacted by the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union.
In June 2016, the U.K. held a referendum in which voters approved an exit from the E.U., commonly referred to as “Brexit.” The U.K. formally exited the E.U. on January 30, 2020, pursuant to a withdrawal agreement between the U.K. government and the E.U. The withdrawal agreement provides for a transition period from February through December 2020 to allow time for a future trade deal to be agreed upon. As a result of the U.K.’s exit from the E.U., there may be greater restrictions on imports and exports between the U.K. and E.U. countries and increased regulatory complexities. These changes may adversely affect our relationships with our existing and future customers, suppliers, employees, and subcontractors, or otherwise have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The ongoing negotiations between the U.K. and the E.U. as to the terms upon which the U.K. will exit from the E.U. and the uncertainty as to their future trade agreement continues to create economic uncertainty, which may cause our customers to closely monitor their costs, terminate or reduce the scope of existing contracts, decrease or postpone currently planned contracts, or negotiate for more favorable deal terms, each of which may have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Rising inflation, interest rates, and/or construction costs could reduce the demand for our services as well as decrease our profit on our existing contracts, in particular with respect to our fixed-price contracts.
Rising inflation, interest rates, or construction costs could reduce the demand for our services. In addition, we bear all of the risk of rising inflation with respect to those contracts that are fixed-price. Because a significant portion of our revenues are earned from cost-reimbursable type contracts (approximately 76% during fiscal 2020), the effects of inflation on our financial condition and results of operations over the past few years have been generally minor. However, if we expand our business into markets and geographic areas where fixed-price and lump-sum work is more prevalent, inflation may have a larger impact on our results of operations in the future. Therefore, increases in inflation, interest rates or construction costs could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Foreign exchange risks may affect our ability to realize a profit from certain projects.

Our reported financial condition and results of operations are exposed to the effects (both positive and negative) that fluctuating exchange rates have on the process of translating the financial statements of our international operations, which are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, into the U.S. dollar. While we generally attempt to denominate our contracts in the currencies of our expenditures, we do enter into contracts that expose us to currency risk, particularly to the extent contract revenue is denominated in a currency different than the contract costs. We attempt to minimize our exposure from currency risks by obtaining escalation provisions for projects in inflationary economies or entering into derivative (hedging) instruments, when there is currency risk exposure that is not naturally mitigated via our contracts. These actions, however, may not always eliminate currency risk exposure. The governments of certain countries have or may in the future impose restrictive exchange controls on local currencies and it may not be possible for us to engage in effective hedging transactions to mitigate the risks associated with fluctuations in a particular currency. Based on fluctuations in currency, the U.S. dollar value of our backlog may from time to time increase or decrease significantly. We may also be exposed to limitations on our ability to reinvest earnings from operations in one country to fund the financing requirements of our operations in other countries.

Page 43


Our operations mayglobal presence could give rise to material fluctuations in our income tax rates.
We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We are regularly under audit by tax authorities. Although we believe that our tax estimates and tax positions are reasonable, they could be impactedmaterially affected by many factors including the United Kingdom’s proposed exit fromfinal outcome of tax audits and related litigation, the European Union.

In June 2016,introduction of new tax accounting standards, legislation, regulations and related interpretations, our global mix of earnings, the U.K. heldrealizability of deferred tax assets and changes in uncertain tax positions. An increase or decrease in our effective tax rate, or an ultimate determination that the Company owes more taxes than the amounts previously accrued, could have a referendum in which voters approved an exit from the E.U., commonly referred to as “Brexit.” As a result of the U.K.’s exit from the E.U., there may be greater restrictions on imports and exports between the U.K. and E.U. countries and increased regulatory complexities. These changes may adversely affect our relationships with our existing and future customers, suppliers, employees, and subcontractors, or otherwise have anmaterial adverse effectimpact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The ongoing negotiations between the U.K.

Our businesses could be materially and the E.U.adversely affected by events outside of our control.
Extraordinary or force majeure events beyond our control, such as natural or man-made disasters, could negatively impact our ability to the terms upon which the U.K. will exitoperate. As an example, from the E.U. and the uncertainty astime to their future trade agreement continues to create economic uncertainty,time we face unexpected severe weather conditions which may causeresult in weather-related delays that are not always reimbursable under a fixed-price contract; evacuation of personnel and curtailment of services; increased labor and material costs in areas resulting from weather-related damage and subsequent increased demand for labor and materials for repairing and rebuilding; inability to deliver materials, equipment and personnel to job sites in accordance with contract schedules; and loss of productivity. We may remain obligated to perform our customersservices after any such natural or man-made event, unless a force majeure clause or other contractual provision provides us with relief from our contractual obligations. If we are not able to closely monitor their costs, terminatereact quickly to such events, or reduce the scopeif a high concentration of existingour projects are in a specific geographic region that suffers from a natural or man-made catastrophe, our operations may be significantly affected, which could have a material adverse impact on our operations. In addition, if we cannot complete our contracts decrease or postpone currently planned contracts, or negotiate for more favorable deal terms, each ofon time, we may be subject to potential liability claims by our clients which may reduce our profits.
Climate change and related environmental issues could have a negativematerial adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In 2020, the World Economic Forum identified failure to act on climate change and related environmental issues as one of the top ten risks in terms of impact and likelihood for the first time. In 2017, the Task-force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD),which is an industry-led group tasked within bringing climate related financial reporting into the mainstream, estimated that the value of the global stock of manageable assets at risk from climate change between now and the year 2100 could be up to $43 trillion USD. The risk framework put forward by the TCFD encourages organizations to consider climate risks and their materiality in four domains (Market/technology; Reputation; Policy/legal; Physical) and across two climate scenarios (“Paris Agreement”, or low carbon scenario; and “Business As Usual (BAU)”, or high carbon scenario). As further described below, each domain could pose a material risk to the Company at a business and/or project level and could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations:
Market and technological shifts: We expect that climate-related market and technological shifts will likely be driven by urban development, population growth, quality of life expectations of an emerging middle class in historically developing countries and developments in digital technologies. This could create demand for: low and zero carbon energy, industrial processes and infrastructure; resilience services for natural environments, infrastructure and communities; and the application of “smart”, data-driven technologies.
Reputation: Our reputation is influenced by our delivery performance, client engagement, innovation, price (of our labor and projects), regulatory compliance and risk management. We anticipate, particularly under our Paris Agreement (1.5°C) scenario, that our reputation with external and internal stakeholders could also be increasingly influenced by our values and practices regarding low/zero carbon transformation.
Policy and legal: Policy and legal environments are expected to diverge sharply between our 4°C (BAU) and 1.5°C (Paris Agreement) scenarios, with the divergence mainly relating to greenhouse gas emissions and the extent to which low/zero carbon transitions are driven. We expect that some national and sub-national jurisdictions and some of our clients may advocate for the transition, regardless of the extent to which there is global alignment with the Paris Agreement. In contrast, both scenarios are expected to converge on climate change-related litigation and policy advocacy and regulatory support for climate resilience.
Page 44


Physical risks: There could be significant physical risks from climate change under both our 4°C and 1.5°C scenarios. These risks could be driven by increased temperature, increased storm intensities, sea level rise and changes in rainfall amount, seasonality and the intensity of extreme events. The types of change are similar under the two scenarios, but their expressions could be much more severe under the 4°C scenario.
Fluctuations in commodity prices may affect our customers’ investment decisions and therefore subject us to risks of cancellation, delays in existing work, or changes in the timing and funding of new awards.
Commodity prices can affect our customers in a number of ways. For example, for those customers that produce commodity products such as oil, gas, copper, or fertilizers, fluctuations in price can have a direct effect on their profitability and cash flow and, therefore, their willingness to continue to invest or make new capital investments. Furthermore, declines in commodity prices can negatively impact our business in regions whose economies are substantially dependent on commodity prices, such as the Middle East. To the extent commodity prices decline or fluctuate and our customers defer new investments or cancel or delay existing projects, the demand for our services decreases, which may have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Commodity prices can also strongly affect the costs of projects. Rising commodity prices can negatively impact the potential returns on investments that are planned, as well as those in progress, and result in customers deferring new investments or canceling or delaying existing projects. Cancellations and delays have affected our past results and may continue to do so in significant and unpredictable ways and could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our continued success is dependent upon our ability to hire, retain, and utilize qualified personnel.
The success of our business is dependent upon our ability to hire, retain and utilize qualified personnel, including engineers, architects, designers, craft personnel and corporate leadership professionals who have the required experience and expertise at a reasonable cost. The market for these and other personnel is competitive. From time to time, it may be difficult to attract and retain qualified individuals with the expertise, and in the timeframe, demanded by our clients, or to replace such personnel when needed in a timely manner. In certain geographic areas, for example, we may not be able to satisfy the demand for our services because of our inability to successfully hire and retain qualified personnel. Furthermore, some of our personnel hold government granted clearance that may be required to obtain government projects. If we were to lose some or all of these personnel, they would be difficult to replace. Loss of the services of, or failure to recruit, qualified technical and leadership personnel could limit our ability to successfully complete existing projects and compete for new projects.
In addition, in the event that any of our key personnel retire or otherwise leave the Company, we need to have appropriate succession plans in place and to successfully implement such plans, which requires devoting time and resources toward identifying and integrating new personnel into leadership roles and other key positions. If we cannot attract and retain qualified personnel or effectively implement appropriate succession plans, it could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The cost of providing our services, including the extent to which we utilize our workforce, affects our profitability. For example, the uncertainty of contract award timing can present difficulties in matching our workforce size with our contracts. If an expected contract award is delayed or not received, we could incur costs resulting from excess staff, reductions in staff, or redundancy of facilities that could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business strategy relies in part on acquisitions to sustain our growth. Acquisitions of other companies present certain risks and uncertainties.

Our business strategy involves growth through, among other things, the acquisition of other companies. Acquiring companies, including CH2M HILL Companies, Ltd., which we acquired in December 2017, KeyW, which we acquired in June 2019, and John Wood Group’s nuclear business, which we acquired in March 2020, presents a number of risks, including:

Assumption of liabilities of an acquired business, including liabilities that were unknown at the time the acquisition was negotiated;

Assumption of liabilities of an acquired business, including liabilities that were unknown at the time the acquisition was negotiated;
Failure of the acquired business to comply with U.S. federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations and/or contractual requirements with government clients;

Page 45


Valuation methodologies may not accurately capture the value of the acquired business;

Failure to realize anticipated benefits, such as cost savings, synergies, business opportunities and revenue enhancements;

growth opportunities;
The loss of key customers or suppliers, including as a result of any actual or perceived conflicts of interest;

Difficulties or delays in obtaining regulatory approvals, licenses and permits;

Difficulties relating to combining previously separate entities into a single, integrated, and efficient business;

The effects of diverting managementsleadership’s attention from day-to-day operations to matters involving the integration of acquired companies;

Potentially substantial transaction costs associated with business combinations;

Potential impairment resulting from the overpayment for an acquisition or post-acquisition deterioration in an acquired business;

Page 25


Difficulties relating to assimilating the personnel, services, and systems of an acquired business and to assimilating marketing and other operational capabilities;

Difficulties relating to assimilating the leadership, personnel, benefits, services, and systems of an acquired business and to assimilating marketing and other operational capabilities;

Difficulties retaining key personnel of an acquired business;

Increased burdens on our staff and on our administrative, internal control and operating systems, which may hinder our legal and regulatory compliance activities;

Difficulties in applying and integrating our system of internal controls to an acquired business;

Increased financial and accounting challenges and complexities in areas such as tax planning, treasury management, financial reporting and internal controls; and

The potential requirement for additional equity or debt financing, which may not be available, or if available, may not have favorable terms.

terms; and
The risks discussed in this Item 1A. Risk Factors that may relate to the activities of the acquired business prior to the acquisition.

While we may obtain indemnification rights from the sellers of acquired businesses and/or insurance that could mitigate certain of these risks, such rights may be difficult to enforce, the losses may exceed any dedicated escrow funds and the indemnitors may not have the ability to financially support the indemnity.

indemnity, or the insurance coverage may be unavailable or insufficient to cover all losses.

If our managementleadership is unable to successfully integrate acquired companies or implement our growth strategy, our operating results could be harmed. In addition, even if the operations of an acquisition are integrated successfully, we may not realize the full benefits of an acquisition, including the synergies, cost savings, or sales or growth opportunities that we expect. These benefits may not be achieved within the anticipated time frame, or at all. Moreover, we cannot assure that we will continue to successfully expand or that growth or expansion will result in profitability.

In addition, there is no assurance that we will continue to locate suitable acquisition targets or that we will be able to consummate any such transactions on terms and conditions acceptable to us. Existing cash balances and cash flow from operations, together with borrowing capacity under our credit facilities, may be insufficient to make acquisitions. Future acquisitions may require us to obtain additional equity or debt financing, which may not be available on attractive terms, or at all. Acquisitions may also bring us into businesses we have not previously conducted and expose us to additional business risks that are different than those we have traditionally experienced.

Acquisitions and divestitures create various business risks and uncertainties during the pendency of the transaction.
Consummation of any merger or divestiture is subject to the satisfaction of customary conditions, including one or more of the following: (i) due diligence and its associated time and cost commitments, (ii) board and shareholder approval, (iii) regulatory approvals, (iv) the absence of any legal restraint that would prevent the consummation of the transaction, (v) the absence of material adverse conditions which can prevent the consummation of the transaction, and (vi) compliance with covenants and the accuracy of representations and warranties contained in the transaction agreement, among others. One or more of these conditions may not be fulfilled and, accordingly, the transaction may not be consummated or may be significantly delayed. In such case, our ongoing business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected and the eventmarket price of our common stock
Page 46


may decline, particularly to the extent that the market price reflects a market assumption that the transaction will be consummated or will be consummated within a particular timeframe.
Furthermore, most transactions require the Company to incur substantial expense associated with closing and if the transaction is not consummated, we issue stock as consideration for certain acquisitions wewill incur these expenses without realizing the expected benefits. The pursuit of the transaction will also require management attention and use of internal resources that would otherwise be focused on general business operations. In addition, customers’ uncertainty about the effect of the transaction may make, wehave an adverse effect on the ability to win customer contracts, or could dilute share ownership.

One methodcause existing clients to seek to change existing business relationships. Employee morale due to the uncertainties associated with the transaction could also be negatively affected. Any of acquiring companiesthe foregoing, or otherwise funding our corporate activities is through the issuance of additional equity securities. If we issue additional equity securities, as is contemplated, for example,other risks arising in connection with a failure or delay in consummating a transaction, including the Merger, such issuances could havediversion of management attention or loss of other opportunities during the effectpendency of diluting our earnings per share as well as our existing shareholders’ individual ownership percentages in the Company.

There can be no assurance that we will pay dividends on our common stock.

Our Board of Directors initiated a quarterly cash dividend program in fiscal 2017 under which we have paid, and intend to continue paying, a regular quarterly dividend.  The declaration, amount and timing of such dividends are subject to capital availability and determinations by our Board of Directors that cash dividends are in the best interest of our stockholders and are in compliance with all respective laws and our agreements applicable to the declaration and payment of cash dividends.  Our ability to pay dividends will depend upon, among other factors, our cash balances and potential future capital requirements for strategic transactions, including acquisitions, debt service requirements, results of operations, financial condition and other factors that our Board of Directors may deem relevant.  A reduction in or elimination of our dividend payments and/or our dividend programtransaction, could have a material negativeadverse effect on our stock price.

Our quarterlybusiness, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Regulatory Compliance
Past and future environmental, health, and safety laws could impose significant additional costs and liabilities.
We are subject to a variety of environmental, health, and safety laws and regulations governing, among other things, discharges to air and water, the handling, storage and disposal of hazardous or waste materials and the remediation of contamination associated with the releases of hazardous substances, and human health and safety. These laws and regulations and the risk of attendant litigation can cause significant delays to a project and add significantly to its cost. Violations of these regulations could subject us and our management to civil and criminal penalties and other liabilities.
Various U.S. federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and regulations may fluctuate significantly, whichimpose liability for property damage and costs of investigation and cleanup of hazardous or toxic substances on property currently or previously owned by us or arising out of our waste management or environmental remediation activities. These laws may impose responsibility and liability without regard to knowledge of or causation of the presence of contaminants. The liability under these laws may be joint and several. We have potential liabilities associated with our past waste management and other activities and with our current and prior ownership of various properties. The discovery of additional contaminants or the imposition of unforeseen clean-up obligations at these or other sites could have a material negative effect on the price of our common stock.

Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly, which could cause our operating results to fall below the expectations of securities analysts and have a material negative effect on the price of our common stock. Fluctuations are caused by a number of factors, including:

Fluctuations in the spending patterns of our government and commercial customers;

The number and significance of projects executed during a quarter;

Page 26


Unanticipated changes in contract performance, particularly with contracts that have funding limits;

The timing of resolving change orders, requests for equitable adjustments, and other contract adjustments;

Delays incurred in connection with a project;

Changes in prices of commodities or other supplies;

Changes in foreign currency exchange rates;

Weather conditions that delay work at project sites;

The timing of expenses incurred in connection with acquisitions or other corporate initiatives;

The decision by the Board of Directors to begin or cease paying a dividend, and the expectation that if the Company pays dividends, it would declare dividends at the same or higher levels in the future;

Natural disasters or other crises;

Staff levels and utilization rates;

Changes in prices of services offered by our competitors; and

General economic and political conditions.

Our actual results could differ from the estimates and assumptions used to prepare our financial statements.

In preparing our financial statements, our management is required under U.S. GAAP to make estimates and assumptions as of the date of the financial statements. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported values of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Areas requiring significant estimates by our management include:

Recognition of contract revenue, costs, profit or losses in applying the principles of percentage of completion accounting;

Estimated amounts for expected project losses, warranty costs, contract close-out or other costs;

Recognition of recoveries under contract change orders or claims;

Collectability of billed and unbilled accounts receivable and the need and amount of any allowance for doubtful accounts;

Estimates of other liabilities, including litigation and insurance revenues/reserves and reserves necessary for self-insured risks;

Accruals for estimated liabilities, including litigation reserves;

Valuation of assets acquired, and liabilities, goodwill, and intangible assets assumed, in acquisitions;

Valuation of stock-based compensation;

The determination of liabilities under pension and other post-retirement benefit programs; and

Income tax provisions and related valuation allowances.

Our actual business and financial results could differ from our estimates of such results, which could have a material negativeadverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

An impairment charge on

When we perform our goodwillservices, our personnel and equipment may be exposed to radioactive and hazardous materials and conditions. We may be subject to liability claims by employees, customers and third parties as a result of such exposures. In addition, we may be subject to fines, penalties or other liabilities arising under environmental or safety laws. A claim, if not covered or only partially covered by insurance, could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial positioncondition.
Health, safety, and environmental laws and regulations and policies are reviewed periodically and any changes thereto could affect us in substantial and unpredictable ways. Such changes could, for example, relax or repeal laws and regulations relating to the environment, which could result in a decline in the demand for our environmental services and, in turn, could negatively impact our revenue. Changes in the environmental laws and regulations, remediation obligations, enforcement actions, stricter interpretations of existing requirements, future discovery of contamination or claims for damages to persons, property, natural resources or the environment could result in material costs and liabilities that we currently do not anticipate. If we fail to comply with any environmental, health, or safety laws or regulations, whether actual or alleged, we could be exposed to fines, penalties or potential litigation liabilities, including costs, settlements and judgments, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Because

In addition, we have grown in part through acquisitions, goodwill and intangible assets represent a substantial portionmany of our assets. Under U.S. GAAP, we are requiredclients operate in highly regulated environments, which may require us or our clients to test goodwill carried in our Consolidated Balance Sheets for possible impairment on an annual basis based upon a fair value approach. Asobtain, and to comply with, federal, state and local government permits and approvals. Any of September 29, 2017, we had $3.0 billion of goodwill, representing 40.8% of our total assets of $7.4 billion. We have chosenthese permits or approvals may be subject to perform our annual impairment reviews of goodwill atdenial, revocation or modification under various circumstances. Failure to obtain or comply with, or the endloss or modification of, the third quarterconditions of our fiscal year. We also are required to test goodwill for impairment between annual tests if events occurpermits or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce our enterprise fair value below its book value. These events or circumstances could include a significant change in the business climate, including a significant sustained

Page 27


decline in a reporting unit’s market value, legal factors, operating performance indicators, competition, sale or disposition of a significant portion of our business, potential government actions toward our facilities, and other factors.

If our market capitalization drops significantly below the amount of net equity recorded on our balance sheet, it might indicate a decline in our fair value and would requireapprovals may subject us to further evaluate whether our goodwill has been impaired. If the fair value of our reporting units is less than their carrying value, we could be required to record an impairment charge. The amount of any impairment could be significant andpenalties or other liabilities, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial positioncondition and resultsresult of operations.

Page 47


If we fail to comply with federal, state, local or foreign governmental requirements, our business may be adversely affected.
We are subject to U.S. federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations that affect our business. For example, our global operations require importing and exporting goods and technology across international borders which requires full compliance with both export regulatory laws and International Trafficking in Arms Regulations (“ITAR”). Although we have policies and procedures to comply with U.S. and foreign international trade laws, the violation of such laws could subject the Company and its employees to civil or criminal penalties, including substantial monetary fines, or other adverse actions including denial of import or export privileges or debarment from participation in U.S. government contracts, and could damage our reputation and our ability to do business.
We could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws.
The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010, and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments for the periodpurpose of obtaining or retaining business. Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws, including the requirements to maintain accurate information and internal controls. We operate in which the charge is taken. For a further discussion of goodwill impairment testing, please see Item 7- Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations below.

We may be required to contribute additional cash to meet any underfunded benefit obligations associated with retirement and post-retirement benefit plans we manage.

We have various employee benefit plan obligations that require us to make contributions to satisfy, over time, our underfunded benefit obligations, which are generally determined by calculating the projected benefit obligations minus the fair value of plan assets. For example, as of September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016, our defined benefit pension and post-retirement benefit plans were underfunded by $252.0 million and $403.1 million, respectively. See Note 7- Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Plansmany parts of the Notesworld that have experienced governmental corruption to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional disclosure. In the future,some degree and in certain circumstances; strict compliance with anti-bribery laws may conflict with local customs and practices. Despite our benefit plan obligations may increasetraining and compliance programs, there is no assurance that our internal control policies and procedures will protect us from acts committed by our employees or decrease depending on changes in the levels of interest rates, pension plan asset performance and other factors.agents. If we are requiredfound to contribute a significant amount of the deficitbe liable for underfunded benefit plans, our cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.

Rising inflation, interest rates, and/FCPA or construction costs could reduce the demand for our services as well as decrease our profit on our existing contracts, in particular with respectother violations (either due to our fixed-price contracts.

Rising inflation, interest rates,own acts or construction costsour inadvertence, or due to the acts or inadvertence of others), we could reduce the demand for our services. In addition, we bear allsuffer from civil and criminal penalties or other sanctions, including contract cancellations or debarment and loss of the riskreputation, any of rising inflation with respect to those contracts that are fixed-price. Because a significant portion of our revenues are earned from cost-reimbursable type contracts (approximately 81% during fiscal 2017), the effects of inflation on our financial condition and results of operations over the past few years have been generally minor. However, if we expand our business into markets and geographic areas where fixed-price and lump-sum work is more prevalent, inflation may have a larger impact on our results of operations in the future. Therefore, increases in inflation, interest rates or construction costswhich could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be affected by market or regulatory responses to climate change.

Growing concerns about climate change may result in the imposition of additional environmental regulations. Legislation, international protocols, regulation or other restrictions on emissions could result in increased compliance costs for us and our clients and have other impacts on our clients, including those who are involved in the exploration, production or refining of fossil fuels, emit greenhouse gases through the combustion of fossil fuels or emit greenhouse gases through the mining, manufacture, utilization or production of materials or goods. Such policy changes could increase the costs of projects for our clients or, in some cases, prevent a project from going forward, thereby potentially reducing the need for our services, which would in turn have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. However, these changes could also increase the pace of projects, such as carbon capture or storage projects, that could have a positive impact on our business. We cannot predict when or whether any of these various proposals may be enacted or what their effect will be on us or on our customers.

Risks Related to Our effective tax rate may increase or decrease.

Indebtedness

We rely on cash provided by operations and liquidity under our credit facilities to fund our business. Negative conditions in the credit and financial markets and delays in receiving client payments could adversely affect our cost of borrowing and our business.
Although we finance much of our operations using cash provided by operations, at times we depend on the availability of credit to grow our business and to help fund business acquisitions. We are currently a borrower under several credit facilities. These facilities all contain customary covenants restricting, among other things, our ability to incur certain liens and indebtedness. We are also subject to income taxescertain financial covenants, including maintenance of a maximum consolidated leverage ratio. A breach of any covenant or our inability to comply with the required financial ratios could result in a default under one or more of our credit facilities and limit our ability to do further borrowing. Instability in the credit markets in the U.S. or abroad could cause the availability of credit to be relatively difficult or expensive to obtain at competitive rates, on commercially reasonable terms or in sufficient amounts. This situation could make it more difficult or more expensive for us to access funds, refinance our existing indebtedness, enter into agreements for new indebtedness, or obtain funding through the issuance of securities or such additional capital may not be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all. We may also enter into business acquisition agreements that require us to access credit, which if not available at the closing of the acquisition could result in a breach of the acquisition agreement and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provisiona resulting claim for income taxes.damages by the sellers of such business. In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We are regularly under audit by tax authorities. Although we believe that our tax estimates and tax positions are reasonable, they addition, market conditions
Page 48


could be materially affected by many factors including the final outcome of tax audits and related litigation, the introduction of new tax accounting standards, legislation, regulations, and related interpretations, our global mix of earnings, the realizability of deferred tax assets and changes in uncertain tax positions. An increase or decrease in our effective tax rate, or an ultimate determination that the Company owes more taxes than the amounts previously accrued, could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Page 28


Systems and information technology interruption or failure and data security breaches could adverselynegatively impact our clients’ ability to operate or expose us to significant financial lossesfund their projects and, reputational harm.

We rely heavily on computer, information, and communications technology and related systems in order to properly operatetherefore, utilize our business. From time to time, we experience occasional system interruptions and delays. In the event we are unable to regularly deploy software and hardware, effectively upgrade our systems and network infrastructure, and take other steps to maintain or improve the efficiency and efficacy of our systems, the operation of such systems could be interrupted or result in the loss, corruption, or release of data. In addition, our computer and communication systems and operations could be damaged or interrupted by natural disasters, force majeure events, telecommunications failures, power loss, acts of war or terrorism, computer viruses, malicious code, physical or electronic security breaches, intentional or inadvertent user misuse or error, or similar events or disruptions. Any of these or other events could cause interruptions, delays, loss of critical and/or sensitive data or similar effects,services, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, protection of intellectual property, and results of operations, as well as those of our clients.

operations.

In addition, we faceare subject to the threatrisk that the counterparties to our computer systems of unauthorized access, computer hackers, computer viruses, malicious code, organized cyber-attackscredit agreements may go bankrupt if they suffer catastrophic demand on their liquidity that will prevent them from fulfilling their contractual obligations to us. We also routinely enter into contracts with counterparties including vendors, suppliers and other security problems and system disruptions, including possible unauthorized access to and disclosure of our and our clients’ proprietary or classified information. As part of our ongoing effort to utilize industry accepted security measures and technology to securely maintain all confidential and proprietary information on our computer systems, we have observed increased threat activity to our computer systems, and have identified instances of unauthorized access to certain of our computer systems occurringsubcontractors that may be negatively impacted by events in the 2014-2016 timeframe. In response, we are conducting an ongoing internal investigation with the assistance of outside counsel and technical experts to identify and remediate the source and impact of these incursions, as well as comply with related notification and disclosure obligations. Expenses incurred to date related to this matter have not been material. We will incur additional expenses and may incur losses in connection with this matter, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditions, results of operations and cash flows; however, at this time wecredit markets. If those counterparties are unable to reasonably estimate any such additional expenses or losses.

While we have security measures and technology in placeperform their obligations to protect our and our clients’ proprietary or classified information, if these measures fail as a result of a cyber-attack, other third-party action, employee error, malfeasance or otherwise, and someone obtains unauthorized access to ourus or our clients’ information, our reputation could be damaged, our business may suffer and we could incur significant liability. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or sabotage systems change frequently and generally are not identified until they are launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. As a result,clients, we may be required to expend significant resourcesprovide additional services or make alternate arrangements on less favorable terms with other parties to protect againstensure adequate performance and delivery of services to our clients. These circumstances could also lead to disputes and litigation with our partners or clients, which could have a material adverse impact on our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.

Some of our customers, suppliers and subcontractors depend on access to commercial financing and capital markets to fund their operations. Disruptions of the threat of system disruptionscredit or capital markets could adversely affect our clients’ ability to finance projects and security breachescould result in contract cancellations or suspensions, project delays and payment delays or defaults by our clients. In addition, clients may be unable to fund new projects, may choose to make fewer capital expenditures or otherwise slow their spending on our services or to alleviate problems causedseek contract terms more favorable to them. Our government clients may face budget deficits that prohibit them from funding proposed and existing projects or that cause them to exercise their right to terminate our contracts with little or no prior notice. In addition, any financial difficulties suffered by theseour subcontractors or suppliers could increase our cost or adversely impact project schedules. These disruptions and breaches. Any of these events could damagematerially impact our reputationbacklog and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We continuously evaluate the need to upgrade and/or replace our systems and network infrastructure to protect our computing environment, to stay current on vendor supported products and to improve the efficiency of our systems and for other business reasons. The implementation of new systems and information technology could adversely impact our operations by imposing substantial capital expenditures, demands on management time and risks of delays or difficulties in transitioning to new systems. And, our systems implementations may not result in productivity improvements at the levels anticipated. Systems implementation disruption and any other information technology disruption, if not anticipated and appropriately mitigated, could have an adverse effect on our business.

We may not be able to protect our intellectual property or that of our clients.

Our technology and intellectual property provide us, in certain instances, with a competitive advantage. Although we protect our property through patent registrations, license restrictions, and similar mechanisms, we may not be able to successfully preserve our rights and they could be invalidated, circumvented, challenged or become obsolete. Our employees and contractors are subject to confidentiality obligations, but this protection may be inadequate to deter or prevent misappropriation of our confidential information and/or infringement of our intellectual property. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries in which we operate do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the U.S. If we are unable to protect and maintain our intellectual property rights or if there are any successful intellectual property challenges or infringement proceedings against us, our ability to differentiate our service offerings could be reduced. Litigation to determine the scope of intellectual property rights, even if ultimately successful, could be costly and could divert management’s attention away from other aspects of our business.

Page 29


We also hold licenses from third parties which may be utilized in our business operations.  If we are no longer able to license such technology on commercially reasonable terms or otherwise, our business and financial performance could be adversely affected.

If our intellectual property rights or work processes become obsolete, we may not be able to differentiate our service offerings and some of our competitors may be able to offer more attractive services to our customers. Our competitors may independently attempt to develop or obtain access to technologies that are similar or superior to our technologies.

Our clients or other third parties may also provide us with their technology and intellectual property. There is a risk we may not sufficiently protect our or their information from improper use or dissemination and, as a result, could be subject to claims and litigation and resulting liabilities, loss of contracts or other consequences that could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our businesses could be materially

In addition, we typically bill our clients for our services in arrears and adversely affected by events outsideare, therefore, subject to our clients delaying or failing to pay our invoices after we have already committed resources to their projects. In weak economic environments, we may experience increased delays and failures due to, among other reasons, our clients’ unwillingness to pay for alleged poor performance or to preserve their own working capital. If one or more clients delays in paying or fails to pay us a significant amount of our control.

Extraordinaryoutstanding receivables, it could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

Furthermore, our cash balances and short-term investments are maintained in accounts held by major banks and financial institutions located primarily in North America, Europe, South America, Australia and Asia. Some of our accounts hold deposits in amounts that exceed available insurance. Although none of the financial institutions in which we hold our cash and investments have gone into bankruptcy or force majeureforced receivership, or have been seized by their governments, there is a risk that such events beyondmay occur in the future. If any such events were to occur, we would be at risk of not being able to access our control, such as natural or man-made disasters, could negatively impact our ability to operate. As an example, from time to time we face unexpected severe weather conditionscash, which may result in weather-related delaysa temporary liquidity crisis that are not always reimbursable under a fixed-price contract; evacuation of personnel and curtailment of services; increased labor and material costs in areas resulting from weather-related damage and subsequent increased demand for labor and materials for repairing and rebuilding; inabilitycould impede our ability to deliver materials, equipment and personnel to jobsites in accordance with contract schedules; and loss of productivity. We may remain obligated to performfund our services after any such natural or man-made event, unless a force majeure clause or other contractual provision provides us with relief from our contractual obligations. If we are not able to react quickly to such events, or if a high concentration of our projects are in a specific geographic region that suffers from a natural or man-made catastrophe, our operations, may be significantly affected, which could have a negativematerial adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Maintaining adequate bonding and letter of credit capacity is necessary for us to successfully bid on and win some contracts.
In line with industry practice, we are often required to provide performance or payment bonds or letters of credit to our customers. These instruments indemnify the customer should we fail to perform our obligations under the contract. If a bond or a letter of credit is required for a particular project and we are unable to obtain an appropriate bond or letter of credit, we cannot pursue that project. Historically, we have had adequate bonding and letter of credit capacity but, as is typically the case, the issuance of a bond is at the surety’s sole discretion and the issuance of a letter of credit is based on the Company's credit-worthiness. Because of an overall lack of worldwide bonding capacity, we may find it difficult to find sureties who will provide required levels of bonding or such bonding may only be available at significant additional cost. There can be no assurance that our bonding capacity will continue to be available to us on reasonable terms. In addition, future projects may require us to obtain letters of credit that extend beyond the term of our existing credit facilities. Our inability to obtain adequate bonding and, as a result, to bid on new contracts that require such bonding or letter of credit could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Page 49


Risks Related to Our Common Stock
Our quarterly results may fluctuate significantly, which could have a material negative effect on the price of our common stock.
Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly or fall below the expectations of securities analysts, which could have a material adverse impact on the price of our common stock. Fluctuations are caused by a number of factors, including:
Legal proceedings, disputes and/or government investigations;
Fluctuations in the spending patterns of our government and commercial customers;
The number and significance of projects executed during a quarter;
Unanticipated changes in contract performance, particularly with contracts that have funding limits;
The timing of resolving change orders, requests for equitable adjustments, and other contract adjustments;
Delays incurred in connection with a project;
Changes in prices of commodities or other supplies;
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates;
Weather conditions that delay work at project sites;
The timing of expenses incurred in connection with acquisitions or other corporate initiatives;
The decision by the Board of Directors to begin or cease paying a dividend, and the expectation that if the Company pays dividends, it would declare dividends at the same or higher levels in the future;
Natural disasters or other crises;
Staff levels and utilization rates;
Changes in prices of services offered by our competitors; and
General economic and political conditions.
There can be no assurance that we will pay dividends on our common stock.
Our Board of Directors initiated a quarterly cash dividend program in fiscal 2017 under which we have paid, and intend to continue paying, regular quarterly dividends. The declaration, amount and timing of such dividends are subject to capital availability and determinations by our Board of Directors that cash dividends are in the best interest of our stockholders and are in compliance with all respective laws and applicable agreements.  Our ability to pay dividends will depend upon, among other factors, our cash balances and potential future capital requirements for strategic transactions, including acquisitions, debt service requirements, results of operations, financial condition and other factors that our Board of Directors may deem relevant.  A reduction in or elimination of our dividend payments and/or our dividend program could have a material negative effect on our stock price.
In the event we issue stock as consideration for certain acquisitions we may make, we could dilute share ownership, and if we receive stock in connection with a divestiture, the value of stock is subject to fluctuation.
One method of acquiring companies or otherwise funding our corporate activities is through the issuance of additional equity securities. If we issue additional equity securities, such issuances could have the effect of diluting our earnings per share as well as our existing shareholders’ individual ownership percentages in the Company.
Page 50


In addition, if we cannot complete our contracts on time, we mayreceive stock or other equity securities in connection with a sale or divestiture of a business, the value of such stock will fluctuate and/or be subject to potential liability claims by our clients whichtrading restrictions. Stock price changes may reduce our profits.

We are subjectresult from, among other things, changes in the business, operations or prospects of the issuer prior to professional standards, duties and statutory obligations on professional reports and opinions we issue, which could subject usor following the transaction, litigation or regulatory considerations, general business, market, industry or economic conditions, the ability to monetary damages.

We issue reports and opinions to clientssell all or a portion of the stock based on our professional engineering expertise as well as ourcurrent market conditions, and other professional credentials that subject us to professional standards, dutiesfactors both within and obligations regulatingbeyond the performancecontrol of our services.the Company. In addition, if the stock received is valued in a currency other than U.S. dollars, the value of such stock will also fluctuate based on foreign currency rates. For example, we issue opinions and reports to government clients in connection with securities offerings. Ifthe ECR sale, the Company still holds 51.3 million ordinary shares of Worley received as a client or another third party alleges that our report or opinion is incorrect or it is improperly relied uponportion of the purchase price. The value of such shares will fluctuate based on the trading price of the Worley shares on the Australian Securities Exchange and we are held responsible, we could be subject to significant monetary damages. In addition, our reports and other work product may need to comply with professional standards, licensing requirements, securities regulations and other laws and rules governing the performanceexchange rate of professional services in the jurisdiction where the services are performed. We could be liable to third parties who use or rely upon our reports and other work product even if we are not contractually bound to those third parties. These events could in turn result in monetary damages and penalties.

Australian dollar.

Delaware law and our charter documents may impede or discourage a takeover or change of control.

We are a Delaware corporation. Certain anti-takeover provisions of the Delaware general corporation law impose restrictions on the ability of others to acquire control of us. In addition, certain provisions of our charter documents may impede or discourage a takeover. For example:

Only our Board of Directors can fill vacancies on the board;

There are various restrictions on the ability of a shareholder to nominate a director for election; and

Our Board of Directors can authorize the issuance of preferred shares.

These types of provisions, as well as our ability to adopt a shareholder rights agreement in the future, could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us, even if the acquisition would be beneficial to our shareholders. Accordingly, shareholders may be limited in the ability to obtain a premium for their shares.

Page 30


Failure of the Merger to be consummated, the termination of the Merger Agreement or a significant delay in the consummation of the Merger could negatively affect our stock price and our future business and financial results.

Our obligations and CH2M’s obligations to consummate the Merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain customary conditions, including, but not limited to: (i) the approval of the Merger Agreement by the CH2M stockholders, (ii) the expiration or termination of applicable waiting periods under, or receipt of the applicable consents required under, the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended and certain foreign antitrust and competition laws, each of which have been satisfied or obtained, (iii) the absence of any order, applicable law or other legal restraints of certain specified governmental authorities enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation of the Merger, (iv) the accuracy of certain representations and warranties of each of the parties contained in the Merger Agreement, subject to specified materiality qualifications, (v) compliance, in all material respects, by each of the parties with their respective covenants contained in the Merger Agreement, (vi) the effectiveness of the registration statement on Form S-4 filed by the Company for the issuance of the Company common stock in the Merger, which was satisfied on November 9, 2017, and the approval of the listing of such shares on the New York Stock Exchange, (vii) the absence of a material adverse effect on either CH2M or the Company since the date of the Merger Agreement and (viii) the other conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement. There can be no assurance that these conditions to the consummation of the Merger will be satisfied in a timely manner or at all.  In addition, other factors such as Jacobs’ ability to obtain the debt financing it needs to consummate the Merger, or legal proceedings related to the Merger, may affect when and whether the Merger will occur.

If the Merger is not consummated or is delayed, our ongoing business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected and the market price of our common stock may decline significantly, particularly to the extent that the market price reflects a market assumption that the Merger will be consummated or will be consummated on a particular timeframe. In addition, we and our subsidiaries may experience negative reactions from our respective clients, regulators, vendors and employees.

Furthermore, we have incurred and expect to continue to incur substantial expenses in connection with the completion of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. If the Merger is not consummated, we will have paid these expenses without realizing the expected benefits of the transaction. Any of the foregoing, or other risks arising in connection with a failure or delay in consummating the Merger, including the diversion of management attention or loss of other opportunities during the pendency of the Merger, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.  

If Jacobs’ financing for the Merger becomes unavailable, the Merger may not be completed.

Jacobs intends to finance the cash component of the consideration payable to CH2M stockholders in the Merger, the repayment of CH2M’s outstanding indebtedness and other transaction expenses with a combination of cash on hand and debt financing, which includes the Jacobs Term Loan Facility in an aggregate principal amount of $1.5 billion and additional borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility. Jacobs currently estimates that the aggregate principal amount of indebtedness to be incurred in connection with the Merger will be approximately $1.9 billion. There are a number of conditions in the Jacobs Term Loan Credit Agreement and the Revolving Credit Facility that must be satisfied or waived in order for closing of the debt financing to occur. There is a risk that these conditions will not be satisfied. In the event that the financing contemplated by the Jacobs Term Loan Credit Agreement and the Revolving Credit Facility is not available, Jacobs may obtain alternative financing to finance the consideration payable to CH2M stockholders in the Merger, the repayment of CH2M’s outstanding indebtedness and other transaction expenses. Such alternative financing may not be available on acceptable terms, in a timely manner or at all. While obtaining financing is not a condition to Jacobs’ obligation to effect the Merger, if other financing becomes necessary and Jacobs is unable to secure such other financing, the Merger may not be completed.

The Merger may adversely affect the outcome of pending and future claims and litigation.

If the Merger is completed, it may give rise to unexpected liabilities and costs, including costs associated with the defense and resolution of possible litigation or other claims, and may have an adverse effect on any pending claims against Jacobs or CH2M. Jacobs could also be subject to claims or litigation related to the Merger, whether or not the Merger is consummated. Such actions may create additional uncertainty relating to the Merger, and responding to such claims and defending such actions may be costly and distracting to management.

Page 31


The current ownership and voting interests of Jacobs stockholders will be diluted by the Merger.

Upon the completion of the Merger, except for stockholders who own stock in both Jacobs and CH2M, each Jacobs stockholder will have a percentage ownership of Jacobs that is smaller than such stockholder’s current percentage ownership of Jacobs. Because of this, Jacobs stockholders will generally have less influence on the management and policies of the combined company than they now have on the management and policies of Jacobs. If the combined company is unable to realize the full strategic and financial benefits currently anticipated from the Merger, Jacobs stockholders will have experienced substantial dilution of their ownership interests in their respective companies without receiving any commensurate benefit, or only receiving part of the strategic and financial benefits currently anticipated from the Merger.

The combined company may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the Merger.

The success of the Merger will depend on, among other things, the combined company’s ability to realize the anticipated benefits from combining Jacobs’ and CH2M’s businesses, including achieving cost savings and operating synergies. The combined company’s ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the Merger will depend, to a large extent, on the ability of Jacobs to integrate the businesses of CH2M with Jacobs. The combination of two independent companies is a complex, costly and time-consuming process. As a result, the combined company will be required to devote significant management attention and resources to integrating the business practices and operations of Jacobs and CH2M. The integration process may disrupt the business of either or both of the companies and, if implemented ineffectively, could preclude or delay the realization of the full benefits expected by Jacobs. The failure of the combined company to meet the challenges involved in integrating successfully the operations of Jacobs and CH2M or otherwise to realize the anticipated benefits of the Merger could cause an interruption of, or a loss of momentum in, the activities of the combined company and could seriously harm its results of operations. In addition, the overall integration of the two companies may result in material unanticipated problems, expenses, liabilities, competitive responses, loss of client relationships and diversion of management’s attention, and may cause the combined company’s stock price to decline.

The difficulties of combining the operations of the companies include, among others:

difficulties in achieving anticipated cost savings, synergies, business opportunities and growth prospects from the combination;

51

delays, unexpected costs or difficulties in completing the integration of CH2M or its assets;  


unanticipated issues in integrating logistics, information, communications and other systems;  

Item 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

unanticipated changes in applicable laws and regulations;  

None.

difficulties assimilating the operations and personnel of acquired companies into our operations;  

unanticipated changes in the combined business due to potential divestitures or other requirements imposed by antitrust regulators;  

Item 2.    PROPERTIES

diversion of the attention and resources of management or other disruptions to current operations;  

challenges in attracting and retaining key personnel;

retaining key customers and suppliers;  

challenges in obtaining new customers and winning customer contracts;

retaining and obtaining required regulatory approvals, licenses and permits;  

organizational conflicts of interest;

difficulties in managing the expanded operations of a significantly larger and more complex company; and

potential unknown liabilities and unforeseen increased expenses or delays associated with the Merger.

Many of these factors will be outside of Jacobs’ and the combined company’s control and any one of them could result in increased costs, decreases in the amount of expected revenues and diversion of management’s time and energy, which could materially impact Jacobs’ and the combined company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, even if the operations of Jacobs and CH2M are integrated successfully, the combined company may not realize the full benefits of the proposed transactions, including the synergies, cost savings or growth opportunities that the combined company expects. These benefits may not be achieved within the anticipated time frame, or at all. As a result, there

Page 32


can be no assurance that the Merger will result in the realization of the full benefits anticipated from the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.

We will be subject to business uncertainties while the Merger is pending and following the combination.

Uncertainty about the effect of the Merger on Jacobs’ employees and business relationships may have an adverse effect on Jacobs and on the combined company following the closing of the Merger. Our continued success depends, in part, upon our ability to retain the talents and dedication of our key employees and the ability of the combined company to retain the talents and dedication of CH2M’s key employees. Employees may decide not to remain with the Company or CH2M, as applicable, while the Merger is pending. If key employees terminate their employment, or if an insufficient number of employees are retained to maintain effective operations, our business activities may be adversely affected and management's attention may be diverted from successfully managing our business to hiring suitable replacements, any of which factors may cause our business to deteriorate. In addition, we or CH2M may not be able to motivate certain key employees during the pendency of the Merger due to a perceived lack of appropriate opportunities for advancement or other reasons.  

In addition, uncertainties during the pendency of the Merger may cause third parties who deal with the Company and/or CH2M to seek to change existing business relationships with us or CH2M. Moreover, customers’ uncertainty about the effect of the Merger, including the perception of potential conflicts of interest with respect to projects where CH2M assumes, or will assume, a project role and Jacobs assumes, or will assume, a delivery role, and vice versa, may have an adverse effect on the ability of Jacobs and/or CH2M to attract or retain customers or to win customer contracts.

In addition, competitors may target the Company’s or CH2M’s clients by highlighting potential uncertainties and integration difficulties that may result from the Merger. The pursuit of the Merger and the preparation for the integration will require management attention and use of internal resources. Any significant diversion of management attention away from ongoing business concerns and any business difficulties resulting from the transition and integration process could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

During the pendency of the Merger and following the Merger, our operating results and share price may be volatile, which could cause the value of our stockholder’s investments to decline.

During the pendency of the Merger and following the Merger, our quarterly and annual operating results, as well as our stock price, may fluctuate, and such fluctuations may be significant. Such fluctuations may occur due to the accretion, or anticipated accretion, of the value of the Merger, the progress and success of the integration process or the perception of such progress or success, additions or departures of key personnel, or sales of large blocks of stock or the perception that such sales may occur.

Jacobs expects to incur substantial indebtedness to finance the Merger, which may decrease Jacobs’ business flexibility and could adversely impact Jacobs’ financial condition and results of operations.

In addition to using cash on hand at Jacobs and CH2M, Jacobs intends to finance the cash component of the consideration payable to the CH2M stockholders in the Merger, the repayment of CH2M’s outstanding indebtedness and other transaction expenses with debt financing, which includes the Jacobs Term Loan Facility in an aggregate principal amount of $1.5 billion and additional borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility. Jacobs currently estimates that the aggregate principal amount of indebtedness to be incurred in connection with the Merger will be approximately $1.9 billion. The financial and other covenants to which Jacobs has agreed to, or may agree to in connection with the incurrence of new indebtedness, and the combined company’s increased indebtedness may have the effect, among other things, of reducing the combined company’s flexibility to respond to changing business and economic conditions, thereby placing the combined company at a competitive disadvantage compared to competitors that have less indebtedness and making the combined company more vulnerable to general adverse economic and industry conditions. The combined company’s increased indebtedness will also increase borrowing costs, and the covenants pertaining thereto may also limit the combined company’s ability to obtain additional financing to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or general corporate requirements. The combined company will also be required to dedicate a larger portion of its cash flow from operations to payments on its indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of its cash flow for other purposes, including working capital, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes. In addition, the terms and conditions of such debt may not be favorable to the combined company and, as such, could further increase the costs of the Merger, as well as the overall burden of such debt upon the combined company and the combined company’s business flexibility. Further, the combined company will be exposed to the risk of increased interest rates as a result of (i) higher leverage at or after the closing of the Merger and

Page 33


(ii) unless the combined company enters into offsetting hedging transactions, interest rates that vary based on LIBOR or a bank’s prime rate.

The combined company’s ability to make payments on and to refinance its debt obligations and to fund planned capital expenditures will depend on its ability to generate cash from the combined company’s operations. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond the combined company’s control.

The combined company may not be able to refinance any of its indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If the combined company cannot service its indebtedness, the combined company may have to take actions such as selling assets, selling additional equity or reducing or delaying capital expenditures, strategic acquisitions, investments or alliances, any of which could impede the implementation of the combined company’s business strategy or prevent the combined company from entering into transactions that would otherwise benefit its business. Additionally, the combined company may not be able to effect such actions, if necessary, on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

Any of the foregoing consequences could adversely affect the combined company’s financial condition or results of operations.

Item 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

Item 2.

PROPERTIES

Our properties consist primarily of office space within general, commercial office buildings located in major cities primarily in the following countries: United States; Azerbaijan; Australia; Austria; Belgium; Canada; Chile; China; Finland;Czech Republic; Egypt; France; Germany; Greece;Hong Kong; India; Indonesia; Iraq; Ireland; Italy; Kazakhstan; Malaysia; Mexico; Morocco; The Netherlands; Oman;New Zealand; The Philippines; Puerto Rico; Peru; Republic of Ireland;Poland; Qatar; Romania; Saudi Arabia; Singapore; Slovakia; South Africa; Singapore; Spain;South Korea; Sweden; Taiwan (Province of China); Thailand; United Arab Emirates;Emirates and the United Kingdom. We also lease smaller offices located in certain other countries. Such space is used for operations (providing technical, professional, and other home office services), sales and administration. Most of our properties are leased. In addition, we have fabrication facilities located in Canada in Pickering, Ontario and Edmonton and Lamont, Alberta. The total amount of space usedleased by us for all of our operations is approximately 7.67.7 million square feet.

We also lease smaller, project offices located throughoutcontinue to evaluate our real estate needs in connection with changes in the U.S.,Company's use of its leased space as a result of the U.K.,COVID-19 pandemic, and in certain other countries. We also rent mostas part of the integration of our construction equipment on a short-term basis.

prior acquisitions.

Item 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Item 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The information required by this Item 3 is included in Note 1218Contractual Guarantees, Litigation, Investigations and Insurance of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

Section 1503 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) requires domestic mine operators to disclose violations and orders issued under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”) by the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration. Under the Mine Act, an independent contractor, such as Jacobs, that performs services or construction of a mine is included within the definition of a mining operator. We do not act as the owner of any mines.

Information concerning mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act and

Item 104 of Regulation S-K is included in Exhibit 95.

4.    MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

None.
Page 34

52


PART II

Item 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Item 5.    MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information

Jacobs’

Our common stock is listed on the NYSE and tradesNew York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol JEC. We provided to the NYSE, without qualification, the required annual certification of our Chief Executive Officer regarding compliance with the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards. The following table sets forth the low and high sales prices of a share of our common stock during each of the fiscal quarters presented, based on the NYSE Composite Price History:  

"J".

 

 

Low Sales

 

 

High Sales

 

 

 

Price

 

 

Price

 

Fiscal 2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First quarter

 

$

49.16

 

 

$

63.42

 

Second quarter

 

 

52.39

 

 

 

62.20

 

Third quarter

 

 

50.53

 

 

 

55.97

 

Fourth quarter

 

 

49.31

 

 

 

58.51

 

Fiscal 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First quarter

 

$

37.51

 

 

$

45.41

 

Second quarter

 

 

34.76

 

 

 

44.77

 

Third quarter

 

 

40.93

 

 

 

53.33

 

Fourth quarter

 

 

48.13

 

 

 

55.89

 

Shareholders

Shareholders

According to the records of our transfer agent, there were 989 shareholderswere 3,182 shareholders of record as of November 10, 2017.

Share Repurchases

On July 23, 2015, the12, 2020.

Dividend Policy
Our Board of Directors approvedinitiated a quarterly cash dividend program in fiscal 2017 under which we have paid, and intend to continue paying, regular quarterly dividends. The declaration, amount and timing of such dividends are subject to capital availability and determinations by our Board of Directors that cash dividends are in the best interest of our stockholders and are in compliance with all respective laws and applicable agreements. Our ability to pay dividends will depend upon, among other factors, our cash balances and potential future capital requirements for strategic transactions, including acquisitions, debt service requirements, results of operations, financial condition and other factors that our Board of Directors may deem relevant.
Share Repurchases
On January 17, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to $500 million$1.0 billion of the Company’s common stock, overto expire on January 16, 2022 (the "2019 Repurchase Authorization"). During fiscal 2019, the next three years.Company launched accelerated share repurchase programs by advancing a total of $500 million to two financial institutions in privately negotiated transactions (collectively, the "2019 ASR Programs"). The specific number of shares that the Company repurchased under the 2019 ASR Programs was determined based generally on a discount to the volume-weighted average price per share of the Company's common stock during a calculation period which ended on June 5, 2019 for the first $250 million in repurchases and on December 4, 2019 for the second $250 million in repurchases. The purchases were recorded as share retirements for purposes of calculating earnings per share.
The following table summarizes the activity under the 2019 Repurchase Authorization during fiscal 2020:

Amount Authorized
(2019 Repurchase Authorization)
Average Price Per Share (1)Shares RepurchasedTotal Shares Retired
$1,000,000,000$81.684,129,0034,129,003
(1)Includes commissions paid and calculated at the average price per share
As a precautionary measure in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company temporarily suspended purchases under the share repurchase plan in March 2020, with such suspension remaining in effect through the fiscal third quarter of 2020. During the fourth fiscal quarter of 2020, the Company resumed share repurchases on a limited basis. As of October 2, 2020, the Company has$57.9 million remaining under the 2019 Repurchase Authorization.
On January 16, 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized an additional share repurchase program of up to $1.0 billion of the Company’s common stock, to expire on January 15, 2023 (the "2020 Repurchase Authorization"). There have been no repurchases under the 2020 Repurchase Authorization as of October 2, 2020.
The share repurchase programs do not obligate the Company to purchase any shares. Share repurchases may be executed through various means including, without limitation, accelerated share repurchases, open market transactions.  The share repurchase program, which expires on July 22, 2018, does not oblige the Companytransactions, privately negotiated transactions, purchases pursuant to purchase any shares.a Rule 10b5-1 plan or otherwise. The authorization for the share repurchase programprograms may be terminated, increased or decreased by the Company’s Board of Directors in its discretion at any time. The timing, amount and manner of our share repurchases may depend upon market conditions and economic circumstances, availability of investment opportunities, the availability and costs of financing, currency fluctuations, the market price of the Company's common stock, other uses of capital and other factors.

There were no repurchases of our common stock during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017.

Dividends

Our current policy is to use cash flows from operations to fund future growth, pay down debt, and, subject to market conditions, repurchase common stock under a stock buy-back program approved by our Board of Directors.  On December 1, 2016, the Company announced that the Board of Directors has approved the initiation of a cash dividend program.  Quarterly dividends of $0.15 per share were paid in each of the second, third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2017.  On September 27, 2017, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.15 per share, which was paid on November 10, 2017.  Future dividend payments are subject to review and approval by the Company’s Board of Directors.

Page 53


Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities.

None.

Page 35


Performance Graph

The following graph and table shows the changes over the five-year period ended September 29, 2017October 2, 2020 in the value of $100 as of the close of market on September 30, 2012October 2, 2015 in (1) the common stock of Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., (2) the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index and (3) the Dow Jones Heavy Construction GroupStandard & Poor's 1500 IT Consulting & Other Services Index.
The values of each investment are based on share price appreciation, with reinvestment of all dividends, provided any were paid. The investments are assumed to have occurred at the beginning of the period presented. The stock performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

 

 

2012

 

 

2013

 

 

2014

 

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

 

2017

 

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

 

 

100.00

 

 

 

143.90

 

 

 

120.75

 

 

 

92.58

 

 

 

127.92

 

 

 

145.32

 

S&P 500

 

 

100.00

 

 

 

119.34

 

 

 

142.89

 

 

 

142.02

 

 

 

163.93

 

 

 

194.44

 

Dow Jones US Heavy Construction

 

 

100.00

 

 

 

125.97

 

 

 

120.24

 

 

 

89.30

 

 

 

101.31

 

 

 

109.49

 

jec-20201002_g14.jpg

Note: The above information was provided by Research Data Group, Inc.

 201520162017201820192020
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.100.00 138.18 156.97 208.45 251.00 256.72 
S&P 500100.00 115.43 136.91 161.43 168.30 193.80 
S&P 1500 IT Consulting & Other Services100.00 114.30 125.05 146.93 142.84 146.88 

Page 36

54

Item 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA


Item 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table presents selected financial data for each of the last five fiscal years. This selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes beginning on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. On April 26, 2019, Jacobs completed the sale of its ECR business to Worley. As a result of the ECR sale, substantially all ECR-related assets and liabilities were sold (the "Disposal Group"). We determined that the Disposal Group should be reported as discontinued operations in accordance with ASC 210-05, Discontinued Operations because their disposal represented a strategic shift that had a major effect on our operations and financial results. As such, the financial results of the ECR business are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Additionally, current and non-current assets and liabilities of the Disposal Group are reflected as held-for-sale in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 28, 2018. Further, for the year ended September 27, 2019, a portion of the ECR business remained held by Jacobs and was classified as held for sale as of fiscal year 2019 in accordance with U.S. GAAP. For further discussion see Note 15- Sale of Energy, Chemicals and Resources ("ECR") Business to the consolidated financial statements. Dollar amounts are presented in thousands, except for per share information:

 

 

2017 (a)

 

 

2016 (b)

 

 

2015 (c)

 

 

2014 (d)

 

 

2013

 

Results of Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

10,022,788

 

 

$

10,964,157

 

 

$

12,114,832

 

 

$

12,695,157

 

 

$

11,818,376

 

Net earnings attributable to Jacobs

 

 

293,727

 

 

 

210,463

 

 

 

302,971

 

 

 

328,108

 

 

 

423,093

 

Financial Position:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current ratio

 

1.56 to 1

 

 

1.61 to 1

 

 

1.58 to 1

 

 

1.58 to 1

 

 

2.07 to 1

 

Working capital

 

 

1,069,953

 

 

 

1,081,784

 

 

 

1,141,512

 

 

 

1,372,332

 

 

 

2,020,853

 

Current assets

 

 

2,996,180

 

 

 

2,864,470

 

 

 

3,122,678

 

 

 

3,722,178

 

 

 

3,908,473

 

Total assets

 

 

7,380,859

 

 

 

7,360,022

 

 

 

7,785,926

 

 

 

8,453,659

 

 

 

7,274,144

 

Cash

 

 

774,151

 

 

 

655,716

 

 

 

460,859

 

 

 

732,647

 

 

 

1,256,405

 

Long-term debt

 

 

235,000

 

 

 

385,330

 

 

 

584,434

 

 

 

764,075

 

 

 

415,086

 

Total Jacobs stockholders’ equity

 

 

4,428,352

 

 

 

4,265,276

 

 

 

4,291,745

 

 

 

4,469,255

 

 

 

4,213,097

 

Return on average equity

 

 

6.76

%

 

 

4.92

%

 

 

6.92

%

 

 

7.56

%

 

 

10.66

%

Backlog:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Technical professional services

 

 

12,593,615

 

 

 

12,013,121

 

 

 

11,692,404

 

 

 

12,607,029

 

 

 

11,118,400

 

Field services

 

 

7,194,998

 

 

 

6,747,408

 

 

 

7,114,166

 

 

 

5,773,005

 

 

 

6,099,500

 

Total

 

 

19,788,613

 

 

 

18,760,529

 

 

 

18,806,570

 

 

 

18,380,034

 

 

 

17,217,900

 

Per Share Information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share

 

 

2.43

 

 

 

1.75

 

 

 

2.42

 

 

 

2.51

 

 

 

3.27

 

Diluted earnings per share

 

 

2.42

 

 

 

1.73

 

 

 

2.40

 

 

 

2.48

 

 

 

3.23

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

 

36.78

 

 

 

35.26

 

 

 

34.85

 

 

 

33.92

 

 

 

32.00

 

Average Number of Shares of Common Stock and

   Common Stock Equivalents Outstanding (Diluted)

 

 

121,466

 

 

 

121,483

 

 

 

126,110

 

 

 

132,371

 

 

 

130,945

 

Common Shares Outstanding At Year End

 

 

120,386

 

 

 

120,951

 

 

 

123,153

 

 

 

131,753

 

 

 

131,639

 

Cash Dividends Declared Per Common Share

 

$

0.60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

___________

(a)

Includes costs of $87.9 million, or $0.73 per diluted share, related to the Company's restructuring and other initiatives in the first, second, third and fourth quarter of fiscal 2017.  Also included in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 are after-tax charges of $10.6 million, or $0.09 per diluted share, respectively, in professional fees and related costs associated with the pending CH2M acquisition.For a description of these restructuring and other initiatives, see “Restructuring and Other Charges” in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

(b)

Includes costs of $135.6 million, or $1.12 per diluted share, related to the Company's restructuring initiatives in the first, second, third and fourth quarter of fiscal 2016.  Also included in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 are (i) a loss on sale of our French subsidiary of $17.1 million or $0.14 per diluted share; and (ii) a non-cash write-off on an equity investment of $10.4 million or $0.09 per diluted share.  For a description of these restructuring and other initiatives, see “Restructuring and Other Charges” in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

(c)

Includes costs of $107.9 million, or $0.86 per diluted share, related to the Company's restructuring initiatives in the second, third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2015.  For a description of these restructuring and other initiatives, see “Restructuring and Other Charges” in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 2020 (a)2019 (b)2018 (c)2017 (d)2016 (e)
Results of Operations:     
Revenues$13,566,975$12,737,868$10,579,773$6,330,126$6,257,478
Net Earnings (Loss) Attributable to Jacobs from Continuing Operations$353,861$290,960$(4,185)$170,167$159,998
Financial Position:     
Current ratio1.54 to 11.34 to 11.45 to 11.56 to 11.61 to 1
Working capital$1,598,002$1,038,062$1,410,891$1,069,953$1,081,784
Current assets$4,539,599$4,111,768$4,556,584$2,996,180$2,864,470
Total assets$12,354,353$11,462,711$12,645,795$7,380,859$7,360,022
Cash$862,424$631,068$634,870$607,821$507,169
Long-term debt$1,676,941$1,201,245$2,144,167$235,000$385,330
Total Jacobs stockholders’ equity$5,815,712$5,714,691$5,854,345$4,428,352$4,265,276
Return on average equity6.14%5.03%(0.08)%3.91%3.74%
Backlog:$23,818$22,569$19,955$13,147$11,535
Per Share Information:     
Basic Net Earnings (Loss) from Continuing Operations Per Share$2.69$2.11$(0.03)$1.41$1.33
Diluted Net Earnings (Loss) from Continuing Operations Per Share$2.67$2.09$(0.03)$1.40$1.32
Stockholders’ equity$43.82$41.05$42.21$36.78$35.26
Average Number of Shares of Common Stock and Common Stock Equivalents Outstanding (Diluted)132,721139,206137,536120,147121,483
Common Shares Outstanding At Year End129,748132,879142,218120,386120,951
Cash Dividends Declared Per Common Share$0.76$0.68$0.60$0.60$

(d)

Includes costs of $109.2 million, or $0.82 per diluted share, related to the Company's restructuring initiatives in the third and fourth quarter of fiscal 2014.

(a)Includes after-tax costs of $248.2 million, or $1.87 per diluted share from continuing operations, related to the Company's restructuring, transactions, and other initiatives during fiscal 2020. Also includes amortization of intangible assets of $68.3 million, or $0.51 per diluted share from continuing operations, and $56.9 million, or $0.43 per diluted share from continuing operations in fair value adjustments partly offset by dividend income related to our investment in Worley stock and certain foreign currency revaluations relating to ECR sale proceeds

(b)Includes after-tax costs of $259.8 million, or $1.87 per diluted share from continuing operations, related to the Company's restructuring, transactions, and other initiatives during fiscal 2019. Also includes amortization of intangible assets of $59.0 million, or $0.42 per diluted share from continuing operations, and $48.1 million, or $0.34 per diluted share from continuing operations in fair value adjustments partly offset by dividend income related to our investment in Worley stock and certain foreign currency revaluations relating to ECR sale proceeds
(c)Includes after-tax costs of $112.8 million, or $0.81 per diluted share from continuing operations, related to the Company's restructuring and other initiatives during fiscal 2018. Also included in fiscal 2018 are after-tax charges of $60.7 million, or $0.44 per diluted share, in professional fees and related costs associated with the CH2M acquisition and pending ECR sale, $259.2 million, or $1.86 per diluted share from continuing operations, in charges related to tax reform and amortization of intangible assets of $51.5 million, or $0.37 per diluted share from continuing operations
Page 37

55

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


(d)Includes after-tax costs of $65.0 million, or $0.54 per diluted share from continuing operations, related to the Company's restructuring and other initiatives during fiscal 2017.  Also included in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 are after-tax charges of $10.6 million, or $0.09 per diluted share from continuing operations, respectively, in professional fees and related costs associated with the CH2M acquisition. Also includes amortization of intangible assets of $33.5 million, or $0.28 per diluted share from continuing operations
(e)Includes after-tax costs of $75.2 million, or $0.62 per diluted share from continuing operations, related to the Company's restructuring initiatives during fiscal 2016. Also included in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 are (i) a loss on sale of our French subsidiary of $17.1 million or $0.14 per diluted share from continuing operations; and (ii) a non-cash write-off on an equity investment of $10.4 million or $0.09 per diluted share from continuing operations. Also includes amortization of intangible assets of $47.6 million, or $0.28 per diluted share from continuing operations.
Item 7.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

In order to better understand better the changes that occur to key elements of our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, a reader of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) should be aware of the critical accounting policies we apply in preparing our consolidated financial statements.

The consolidated financial statements contained in this report were prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of our consolidated financial statements and the financial statements of any business performing long-term professional services, engineering and construction-type contracts requires management to make certain estimates and judgments that affect both the entity’s results of operations and the carrying values of its assets and liabilities. Although our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 – 2- Significant Accounting Policies of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the following discussion is intended to highlight and describe those accounting policies that are especially critical to the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Accounting for Contracts
Engineering, Procurement & Construction Contracts and UseService Contracts
On September 29, 2018, the Company adopted ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, including the subsequent ASUs that amended and clarified the related guidance. The Company recognizes engineering, procurement, and construction contract revenue over time, as performance obligations are satisfied, due to the continuous transfer of Joint Ventures - We recognize revenue earned on our technical professionalcontrol to the customer. Upon adoption of ASC Topic 606, contracts which include engineering, procurement and fieldconstruction services projects under the percentage-of-completion method described in ASC 605-35, Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts. In general, we recognize revenues at the time we provide services. Pre-contract costs are generally expensedaccounted for as incurred.  Contractsa single deliverable (a single performance obligation) and are generallyno longer segmented between types of services. In some instances, the Company’s services associated with a construction activity are limited only to specific tasks such as project services and construction, and accordingly, gross margin related to each activity is recognized as those separatecustomer support, consulting or supervisory services. In these instances, the services are rendered. For multiple contracts with a single customer we account for each contract separately.

typically identified as separate performance obligations.

The Company recognizes revenue using the percentage-of-completion method, of accounting is applied by comparingbased primarily on contract costs incurred to date compared to the total estimated contract costs. Estimated contract costs at completion. On cost-reimbursable contracts,include the cost ofCompany’s latest estimates using judgments with respect to labor hours and costs, materials, and subcontracts are generally excluded fromsubcontractor costs. The percentage-of-completion method (an input method) is the calculationmost representative depiction of the measure of progress towards completion to provide a more meaningful allocation of income. Contract losses are provided for in their entirety in the period they become known, without regard to the percentage-of-completion.

Unapproved change orders are included in the contract price to the extentCompany’s performance because it is probable that such change orders will result in additional contract revenue and the amount of such additional revenue can be reliably estimated. Claims meeting these recognition criteria are included in revenues only to the extent of the related costs incurred.

Certain cost-reimbursable contracts include incentive-fee arrangements. These incentive fees can be based on a variety of factors but the most common are the achievement of target completion dates, target costs, and/or other performance criteria. Failure to meet these targets can result in unrealized incentive fees. We recognize incentive fees based on expected results using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting. As the contract progresses and more information becomes available, the estimate of the anticipated incentive fee that will be earned is revised as necessary. We bill incentive fees based on the terms and conditions of the individual contracts. In certain situations, we are allowed to bill a portion of the incentive fees over the performance period of the contract. In other situations, we are allowed to bill incentive fees only after the target criterion has been achieved. Incentive fees which have been recognized but not billed are included in receivables in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Certain cost-reimbursable contracts with government customers as well as certain commercial clients provide that contract costs are subject to audit and adjustment. In this situation, revenues are recorded at the time services are performed based upon the amounts we expect to realize upon completion of the contracts. Revenues are not recognized for non-recoverable costs. In those situations where an audit indicates that we may have billed a client for costs not allowable under the terms of the contract, we estimate the amount of such nonbillable costs and adjust our revenues accordingly.

When we are directly responsible for subcontractor labor or third-party materials and equipment, we reflect the costs of such items in both revenues and costs (and we refer to such costs as “pass-through” costs). On those projects where the client elects to pay for such items directly and we have no associated responsibility for such items, these amounts are not reflected in either revenues or costs.

As is common to the industry, we execute certain contracts jointly with third parties through various forms of joint ventures and consortiums. Although the joint ventures own and hold the contracts with the clients, the services required by the contracts are typically performed by us and our joint venture partners, or by other subcontractors under subcontracting agreements with the joint ventures. The assets of our joint ventures, therefore, consist almost entirely of cash and receivables

Page 38


(representing amounts due from clients), and the liabilities of our joint ventures consist almost entirely of amounts due to the joint venture partners (for services provided by the partners to the joint ventures under their individual subcontracts) and other subcontractors. In general, at any given time, the equity of our joint ventures represents the undistributed profits earned on contracts the joint ventures hold with clients. Very few of our joint ventures have employees. None of our joint ventures have third-party debt or credit facilities. Under U.S. GAAP, our share of profits and losses associated with the contracts held by the joint ventures is reflected in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Certain of our joint ventures meet the definition of a VIE. In evaluating our VIEs for possible consolidation, we perform a qualitative analysis to determine whether or not we have a “controlling financial interest” in the VIE as defined by U.S. GAAP. We consolidate only those VIEs over which we have a controlling financial interest and are the primary beneficiary.

For the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures, we use either the equity method of accounting or proportional consolidation.

There were no changes in facts and circumstances during the period that caused the Company to reassess the method of accounting for its VIEs.

Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and Others — We measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the estimated grant-date fair value of the award. We estimate the fair value of stock options granted to employees and directors using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Like all option-pricing models, the Black-Scholes model requires the use of subjective assumptions including (i) the expected volatility of the market price of the underlying stock, and (ii) the expected term of the award, among others. Accordingly, changes in assumptions and any subsequent adjustments to those assumptions can cause different fair values to be assigned to our stock option awards. For restricted stock units containing service and performance conditions with measures external to the Company, compensation expense is based on the fair value of such units determined using Monte Carlo Simulations.

Accounting for Pension Plans — The accounting for pension plans requires the use of assumptions and estimates in order to calculate periodic pension cost and the value of the plans’ assetsservices transferred to the customer. Subcontractor materials, labor and liabilities. These assumptions include discount rates, investment returns,equipment and, projected salary increases, among others. The actuarial assumptions used in determiningcertain cases, customer-furnished materials and labor and equipment are included in revenue and cost of revenue when management believes that the funded statusescompany is acting as a principal rather than as an agent (e.g., the company integrates the materials, labor and equipment into the deliverables promised to the customer or is otherwise primarily responsible for fulfillment and acceptability of the plans are provided in Note 7 – Pension and other Postretirement Benefit Plans of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginningmaterials, labor and/or equipment). The Company recognizes revenue, but not profit, on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The expected rates of return on plan assets for fiscal 2018 range from 3.5% to 8.5% which is the same for the fiscal 2017. We believe the range of rates selected for fiscal 2018 reflects the long-term returns expected on the plans’ assets, considering recent market conditions, projected rates of inflation, the diversification of the plans’ assets, and the expected real rates of market returns. The discount rates used to compute plan liabilities were changed from a range of 0.7% to 7.0% in fiscal 2016 to a range of 1.3% to 7.0% in fiscal 2017. These assumptions represent the Company’s best estimate of the rates at which its pension obligations could be effectively settled.

Changes in the actuarial assumptions often have a material effect on the values assigned to plan assets and liabilities, and the associated pension expense. For example, if the discount rate used to value the net pension benefit obligation (“PBO”) at September 30, 2017, was higher (lower) by 0.5%, the PBO would have been lower (higher) at that date by approximately $119.7 million for non-U.S. plans, and by approximately $7.3 million for U.S. plans. If the expected return on plan assets was higher (lower) by 1.0%, the net periodic pension cost for fiscal 2017 would be lower (higher) by approximately $10.7 million for non-U.S. plans, and by approximately $1.3 million for U.S. plans. Differences between actuarial assumptions and actual performance (i.e., actuarial gains and losses)certain uninstalled materials that are not specifically produced, fabricated, or constructed for a project. Revenue on these uninstalled materials is recognized as a component of net periodic pensionwhen control is transferred. Changes to total estimated contract cost or losses, if any, are recognized in the period in which such differences arisethey are recordeddetermined as assessed at the contract level. Pre-contract costs are expensed as incurred unless they are expected to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) andbe recovered from the client. Project mobilization costs are recognizedgenerally charged to project costs as incurred when they are an integrated part of net periodic pension cost in future periodsthe performance obligation being transferred to the client. Under the typical payment terms of our engineering, procurement and construction contracts, amounts are billed as work progresses in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Management monitors trendsagreed-upon contractual terms at periodic intervals (e.g., biweekly or monthly) and customer payments on are typically due within 30 to 60 days of billing, depending on the contract.

Page 56


For service contracts, the Company recognizes revenue over time using the cost-to-cost percentage-of-completion method. Service contracts that include multiple performance obligations are segmented between types of services. For contracts with multiple performance obligations, the Company allocates the transaction price to each performance obligation using an estimate of the stand-alone selling price of each distinct service in the marketplace within which our pension plans operate in an effortcontract. In some instances where the Company is standing ready to assureprovide services, the fairness ofCompany recognizes revenue ratably over the actuarial assumptions used.

Contractual Guarantees, Litigation, Investigations, and Insurance — Inservice period. Under the normal course of business, we are subject to certain contractual guarantees and litigation. The guarantees to which we are a party generally relate to project schedules and plant performance. Most of the litigation in which we are involved has us as a defendant in workers’ compensation; personal injury; environmental; employment/labor; professional liability; and other similar lawsuits. We maintain insurance coverage for various aspectstypical payment terms of our business and operations. We have elected, however, to retain a portion of losses that occur through the use of various deductibles, limits, and retentions under our insurance programs. In addition, our insurance

Page 39


policies may contain exclusions for certain matters, and insurance companies may seek to deny coverage for claims against us. This situation may subject us to some future liability for which weservice contracts, amounts are only partially insured, or completely uninsured, and we intend to mitigate any such future liability by continuing to exercise prudent business judgment in negotiating the terms and conditions of our contracts.

In accordance with U.S. GAAP, we record in our Consolidated Balance Sheets amounts representing our estimated liability relating to such guarantees, litigation, and insurance claims. We include any adjustments to such liabilities in our consolidated results of operations.

In addition,billed as a contractor providing services to the U.S. federal government and several of its agencies, we are subject to many levels of audits, investigations, and claims by, or on behalf of, the U.S. federal government with respect to contract performance, pricing, costs, cost allocations, and procurement practices. We adjust revenues based upon the amounts we expect to realize considering the effects of any client audits or governmental investigations.

Testing Goodwill for Possible Impairment — The goodwill carried on our Consolidated Balance Sheets is tested annually for possible impairment. In performing the annual impairment test, we evaluate our goodwill at the reporting unit level. The Company performs the annual goodwill impairment test for the reporting units at the end of the third quarter of our fiscal year. The Company will test goodwill for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2016, we reorganized our operations around four global lines of business, which also serve as our operating segments: Petroleum & Chemicals, Buildings & Infrastructure, Aerospace & Technology, and Industrial.  We determined that this new organization would better support the needs of managing each unique set of customers that fall within each segment. As a result of the new organization, we subsequently realigned our internal reporting structures to enable our Chief Executive Officer, who is also our Chief Operating Decision Maker, to evaluate the performance of each of these segments and make appropriate resource allocations among each of the segments. For purposes of our goodwill impairment testing, we have determined that our operating segments are also our reporting units based on management’s conclusion that the components comprising each of our operating segments share similar economic characteristics and meet the aggregation criteriawork progresses in accordance with ASC 350.

U.S. GAAP does not prescribe a specific valuation method for estimating the fair valueagreed-upon contractual terms, and customer payments are typically due within 30 to 60 days of reporting units. Any valuation technique used to estimate the fair value of a reporting unit requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including revenue growth rates, operating margins, discount rates and future market conditions, among others.

We used both an income approach and a market approach to test our goodwill for possible impairment. Such approaches require us to make estimates and judgments. Under the income approach, fair value is determined by using the discounted cash flows of our reporting units. The Companys discount rate reflects a weighted average cost of capital (WACC) for a peer group of companies representative of the Company’s respective reporting units.  Under the market approach, the fair value of our reporting units is determined by reference to guideline companies that are reasonably comparable to our reporting units; the fair values are estimated basedbilling, depending on the valuation multiples of the invested capital associated with the guideline companies. In assessing whether there is an indication that the carrying value of goodwill has been impaired, we utilize the results of both valuation techniques and consider the range of fair values indicated. The fair values for each reporting unit exceeded the respective book values ranging from 27% to 110%.

It is possible that changes in market conditions, economy, facts and circumstances, judgments, and assumptions used in estimating the fair value could change, resulting in possible impairment of goodwill in the future. The fair values resulting from the valuation techniques used are not necessarily representative of the values we might obtain in a sale of the reporting units to willing third parties.

In performing the Company’s annual impairment test as of the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2017 the Company performed a qualitative assessment, and determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of its reporting units exceeded their carrying amounts. As a result, the Company is not required to proceed to a quantitative impairment assessment.

We have determined that the fair value of our reporting units substantially exceeded their respective carrying values for the Consolidated Balance Sheets presented.

Page 40


Restructuring and Other Charges

During the second fiscal quarter of 2015, the Company began implementing a series of initiatives intended to improve operational efficiency, reduce costs, and better position itself to drive growth of the business in the future. We refer to these initiatives, in the aggregate, as the "2015 Restructuring". These activities evolved and developed over time as management identified and evaluated opportunities for changes in the Company’s operations (and related areas of potential cost savings), as economic conditions changed and as the realignment of the Company’s operations into its four global lines of business was implemented. Actions related to the 2015 Restructuring include involuntary terminations, the abandonment of certain leased offices, combining operational organizations, and the co-location of employees into other existing offices. We did not exit any service types or client end-markets in connection with the 2015 Restructuring.

The majority of the costs associated with the 2015 Restructuring are included in SG&A expense in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. The following table summarizes the impact of the 2015 Restructuring for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015 (in thousands):

contract.

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

 

 

September 29,

2017

 

 

September 30,

2016

 

 

October 2,

2015

 

Lease Abandonments

 

$

55,647

 

 

$

92,643

 

 

$

90,569

 

Involuntary Terminations

 

 

30,716

 

 

 

85,599

 

 

 

55,313

 

Outside Services

 

 

4,236

 

 

 

7,398

 

 

 

12,734

 

Other restructuring related, net

 

8,089

 

 

 

2,267

 

 

 

(1,424

)

Total

 

$

98,688

 

 

$

187,907

 

 

$

157,192

 

The 2015 Restructuring was completed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, with the results of this program generally being in line with management’s expectations.  The Company expects annual savings from the 2015 Restructuring to be approximately $285 million per year.  

During the second fiscal quarter of 2017, the Company entered into strategic business restructuring activities associated with realignment of its Europe, U.K. and Middle East regional operations in our Buildings & Infrastructure segment.  Pre-tax net charges of $22.6 million were recorded associated mainly with net realizable value write-offs on contract accounts receivable of $16.5 million, with additional charges recorded for statutory redundancy and severance costs of $1.4 million and other liabilities of $4.7 million which are both expected to be paid or settled within fiscal 2018.  Additional charges of $1.2 million were recorded under this business exit during third quarter fiscal 2017 associated mainly with contract accounts receivable charges.  Further, management has determined that these business restructuring activities do not qualify for discontinued operations treatment in accordance with U.S. GAAP as the associated businesses were not material.

During the fourth fiscal quarter of 2017, the Company implemented certain restructuring activities (primarily severance related activities) associated with the Company’s announced definitive agreement to acquire CH2M as well as final charges recognized in connection with the completion of the 2015 Restructuring.  Approximately $13.6 million, or $0.11 per diluted share of after tax charges were recorded in association with these activities.

Collectively, the 2015 Restructuring and the above mentioned restructuring activities are referred to as “Restructuring and other charges.”  

Also, our fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 included after-tax charges of $10.6 million, or $0.09 per diluted share in professional fees and related costs associated with the pending CH2M acquisition.

Page 41


The following table summarizes the effects of Restructuring and other charges and CH2M and professional fees and integration costs in the Company’s consolidated results of operations for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015, respectively (in thousands, except for earnings per share):

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

 

U.S. GAAP

 

 

Effects of 

Restructuring

and Other

Charges

 

 

Effects of

CH2M

professional

fees and

integration

costs

 

 

Adjusted

 

Revenue

 

$

10,022,788

 

 

$

17,526

 

 

$

 

 

$

10,040,314

 

Direct cost of contracts

 

 

(8,250,536

)

 

 

4,913

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8,245,623

)

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

(1,379,983

)

 

 

111,767

 

 

 

17,100

 

 

 

(1,251,116

)

Total other income, net

 

 

948

 

 

 

1,233

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,181

 

Earnings before taxes

 

 

393,217

 

 

 

135,439

 

 

 

17,100

 

 

 

545,756

 

Income tax expense

 

 

(105,842

)

 

 

(42,663

)

 

 

(6,498

)

 

 

(155,003

)

Net earnings of the group

 

 

287,375

 

 

 

92,776

 

 

 

10,602

 

 

 

390,753

 

Net earnings attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

6,352

 

 

 

(4,913

)

 

 

 

 

 

1,439

 

Net earnings attributable to Jacobs

 

$

293,727

 

 

$

87,863

 

 

$

10,602

 

 

$

392,192

 

Diluted earnings per share

 

$

2.42

 

 

$

0.73

 

 

$

0.09

 

 

$

3.24

 

 

 

Year Ended

September 30, 2016

 

 

 

U.S. GAAP

 

 

Effects of 2015

Restructuring

 

 

Adjusted

 

Revenue

 

$

10,964,157

 

 

$

 

 

$

10,964,157

 

Direct cost of contracts

 

 

(9,196,326

)

 

 

 

 

 

(9,196,326

)

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

(1,429,233

)

 

 

187,630

 

 

 

(1,241,603

)

Total other (expense) income, net

 

 

(51,875

)

 

 

41,687

 

 

 

(10,188

)

Earnings before taxes

 

 

286,723

 

 

 

229,317

 

 

 

516,040

 

Income tax expense

 

 

(72,208

)

 

 

(66,225

)

 

 

(138,433

)

Net earnings of the group

 

 

214,515

 

 

 

163,092

 

 

 

377,607

 

Net earnings attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

(4,052

)

 

 

 

 

 

(4,052

)

Net earnings attributable to Jacobs

 

$

210,463

 

 

$

163,092

 

 

$

373,555

 

Diluted earnings per share

 

$

1.73

 

 

$

1.35

 

 

$

3.08

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

 

U.S. GAAP

 

 

Effects of 2015

Restructuring

 

 

Adjusted

 

Revenue

$

12,114,832

 

 

$

 

 

$

12,114,832

 

Direct cost of contracts

 

(10,146,494

)

 

 

 

 

 

(10,146,494

)

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

(1,522,811

)

 

 

154,283

 

 

 

(1,368,528

)

Total other (expense) income, net

 

(15,390

)

 

 

2,909

 

 

 

(12,481

)

Earnings before taxes

 

430,137

 

 

 

157,192

 

 

 

587,329

 

Income tax expense

 

(101,255

)

 

 

(49,278

)

 

 

(150,533

)

Net earnings of the group

 

328,882

 

 

 

107,914

 

 

 

436,796

 

Net earnings attributable to non-controlling interests

 

(25,911

)

 

 

 

 

 

(25,911

)

Net earnings attributable to Jacobs

$

302,971

 

 

$

107,914

 

 

$

410,885

 

Diluted earnings per share

$

2.40

 

 

$

0.86

 

 

$

3.26

 

Page 42


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

For the Fiscal Years Ended September 29, 2017,  September 30, 2016, and October 2, 2015

(In thousands, except per share information)

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2,    2015

 

Revenues

 

$

10,022,788

 

 

$

10,964,157

 

 

$

12,114,832

 

Costs and Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Direct costs of contracts

 

 

(8,250,536

)

 

 

(9,196,326

)

 

 

(10,146,494

)

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

(1,379,983

)

 

 

(1,429,233

)

 

 

(1,522,811

)

Operating Profit

 

 

392,269

 

 

 

338,598

 

 

 

445,527

 

Other Income (Expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

 

8,748

 

 

 

7,848

 

 

 

7,262

 

Interest expense

 

 

(12,035

)

 

 

(15,260

)

 

 

(19,503

)

Gain/(Loss) on disposal of business and investments

 

 

10,880

 

 

 

(41,410

)

 

 

(2,909

)

Miscellaneous expense, net

 

 

(6,645

)

 

 

(3,053

)

 

 

(240

)

Total other income (expense), net

 

 

948

 

 

 

(51,875

)

 

 

(15,390

)

Earnings Before Taxes

 

 

393,217

 

 

 

286,723

 

 

 

430,137

 

Income Tax Expense

 

 

(105,842

)

 

 

(72,208

)

 

 

(101,255

)

Net Earnings of the Group

 

 

287,375

 

 

 

214,515

 

 

 

328,882

 

Net Earnings (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

 

 

6,352

 

 

 

(4,052

)

 

 

(25,911

)

Net Earnings Attributable to Jacobs

 

$

293,727

 

 

$

210,463

 

 

$

302,971

 

Net Earnings Per Share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

2.43

 

 

$

1.75

 

 

$

2.42

 

Diluted

 

$

2.42

 

 

$

1.73

 

 

$

2.40

 

2017 Overview

The Company's net earnings for fiscal 2017 were $293.7 million, an increase of $83.3 million, or 39.6%, when compared to fiscal 2016. The Company’s results for the current year when compared to the prior year were favorably impacted by improving gross margins based on benefits from our improvements in project execution and favorable mix.  Our results were also favorably affected by lower SG&A of $49.2 million year over year, due largely to lower costs from our 2015 Restructuring initiatives which concluded at the end of fiscal 2017, with resulting ongoing savings from these initatives helping offset higher personnel related costs and professional services.  Our fiscal 2017 results were also favorably impacted in comparision to 2016 by an $11 million pre tax gain on the sale of our Neste Jacobs JV combined with the non recurrence of 2016 charges associated with the loss on sale of our French subsidiary of $24.4 million and the noncash write-off on an equity investment of $17 million.  Income taxes for fiscal 2017 were higher by $33.6 million due mainly to higher pre-tax income.

On August 1, 2017, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with CH2M HILL Companies, Ltd. (“CH2M”), and Basketball Merger Sub Inc., a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”). Pursuant to and subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, (i) Merger Sub will merge with and into CH2M, with CH2M continuing as the surviving corporation and becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger”) and (ii) each outstanding share of common stock of CH2M will be converted into the right to receive, at the election of the holder thereof in accordance with, and subject to, the terms, conditions and procedures set forth in the Merger Agreement, in each case without interest the following consideration: (a) the combination of (x) $52.85 in cash and (y) 0.6677 shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per share, of the Company; (b) $88.08 in cash; or (c) 1.6693 shares of the Company’s common stock.  The Merger is subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals and approval by CH2M stockholders, and is expected to close by the end of fiscal first quarter 2018.

On January 27, 2017, we acquired Aquenta Consulting Pty Ltd. (“Aquenta”) headquartered in Sydney, Australia, an integrated project service solutions company.  Also, on August 31, 2017, we acquired Blue Canopy, LLC headquartered in Reston, Virginia.  Blue Canopy provides data analytics, cybersecurity and application development.

Page 43


Backlog at September 29, 2017 was $19.8 billion, up $1.0 billion over 2016 and a record level for the Company.  New prospects and new sales remain strong and the Company continues to have a positive outlook for many of the industry groups and markets in which our clients operate.

On December 1, 2016, the Company announced the approval of a cash dividend program.  Quarterly dividends of $0.15 per share were paid in each of the second, third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2017.  On September 27, 2017, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.15 per share, which was paid on November 10, 2017.  Also, the Company repurchased and retired 2.0 million shares of its common stock under its share repurchase program for $97.2 million.

Results of Operations

Fiscal 2017 Compared to Fiscal 2016

Total revenues for the year ended September 29, 2017, were $10.02 billion, a decrease of $941.4 million, or 8.6%, from $10.96 billion for the corresponding period last year. The decrease in revenues was due primarily to lower volumes in the Petroleum & Chemicals, Aerospace & Technology and Industrial LOBs, partially offset by an increase in volume in the Buildings & Infrastructure LOB. These lower volumes were driven mainly by lower field services volume, primarily with Petroleum & Chemicals customers and the timing of project completions versus new project timing.

Direct costs of contracts for the year ended September 29, 2017 were $8.25 billion, a decrease of $945.8 million, or 10.3%, from $9.20 billion for the corresponding period last year. Direct costs of contracts include all costs incurred in connection with and directly for the benefit of client contracts, including depreciation and amortization relating to assets used in providing the services required by the related projects. The level of direct costs of contracts may fluctuate between reporting periods due to a variety of factors, including the amount of pass-through costs we incur during a period. On those projects where we are responsibleacting as principal for subcontract labor or third-party materials and equipment, we reflect the amounts of such items in both revenues and costs (and we refer to such costs as “pass-through costs”). On

Variable Consideration
The nature of the Company’s contracts gives rise to several types of variable consideration, including claims and unpriced change orders; awards and incentive fees; and liquidated damages and penalties. The Company recognizes revenue for variable consideration when it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur. The Company estimates the amount of revenue to be recognized on variable consideration using the expected value (i.e., the sum of a probability-weighted amount) or the most likely amount method, whichever is expected to better predict the amount. Factors considered in determining whether revenue associated with claims (including change orders in dispute and unapproved change orders in regard to both scope and price) should be recognized include the following: (a) the contract or other evidence provides a legal basis for the claim, (b) additional costs were caused by circumstances that were unforeseen at the contract date and not the result of deficiencies in the company’s performance, (c) claim-related costs are identifiable and considered reasonable in view of the work performed, and (d) evidence supporting the claim is objective and verifiable. If the requirements for recognizing revenue for claims or unapproved change orders are met, revenue is recorded only when the costs associated with the claims or unapproved change orders have been incurred and only up to the amount of cost incurred. Back charges to suppliers or subcontractors are recognized as a reduction of cost when it is determined that recovery of such cost is probable and the amounts can be reliably estimated. Disputed back charges are recognized when the same requirements described above for claims accounting have been satisfied.
The Company generally provides limited warranties for work performed under its engineering and construction contracts. The warranty periods typically extend for a limited duration following substantial completion of the Company’s work on the project. Historically, warranty claims have not resulted in material costs incurred for which the Company was not compensated for by the customer.
Practical Expedient
 If the Company has a right to consideration from a customer in an amount that corresponds directly with the value of the Company’s performance completed to date (a service contract in which the company bills a fixed amount for each hour of service provided), the Company recognizes revenue in the amount to which it has a right to invoice for services performed.
The Company does not adjust the contract price for the effects of a significant financing component if the Company expects, at contract inception, that the period between when the Company transfers a service to a customer and when the customer pays for that service will be one year or less.
Page 57


Joint Ventures and VIEs
As is common to the industry, we execute certain contracts jointly with third parties through various forms of joint ventures. Although the joint ventures own and hold the contracts with the clients, the services required by the contracts are typically performed by us and our joint venture partners, or by other subcontractors under subcontracting agreements with the joint ventures. Many of these joint ventures are formed for a specific project. The assets of our joint ventures generally consist almost entirely of cash and receivables (representing amounts due from clients), and the liabilities of our joint ventures generally consist almost entirely of amounts due to the joint venture partners (for services provided by the partners to the joint ventures under their individual subcontracts) and other subcontractors. In general, at any given time, the equity of our joint ventures represents the undistributed profits earned on contracts the joint ventures hold with clients. Very few of our joint ventures have employees or third-party debt or credit facilities. The debt held by the joint ventures is non-recourse to the general credit of Jacobs.
The assets of a joint venture are restricted for use to the obligations of the particular joint venture and are not available for general operations of the Company. Our risk of loss on these arrangements is usually shared with our partners. The liability of each partner is usually joint and several, which means that each partner may become liable for the entire risk of loss on the project. Furthermore, on some of our projects, the Company has granted guarantees which may encumber both our contracting subsidiary company and the Company for the entire risk of loss on the project. The Company is unable to estimate the maximum potential amount of future payments that we could be required to make under outstanding performance guarantees related to joint venture projects due to a number of factors, including but not limited to, the nature and extent of any contractual defaults by our joint venture partners, resource availability, potential performance delays caused by the defaults, the location of the projects, and the terms of the related contracts. See Note 18- Contractual Guarantees, Litigation, Investigations and Insurance for further discussion.
Our unconsolidated joint ventures (including equity method investments) are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investment might not be recoverable, and impairment losses are recognized for such investments if there is a decline in fair value below carrying value that is considered to be other-than-temporary.
Many of the joint ventures are deemed to be variable interest entities (“VIE”) because they lack sufficient equity to finance the activities of the joint venture. The Company uses a qualitative approach to determine if the Company is the primary beneficiary of the VIE, which considers factors that indicate a party has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the joint venture’s economic performance. These factors include the composition of the governing board, how board decisions are approved, the powers granted to the operational manager(s) and partner that holds that position(s), and to a certain extent, the partner’s economic interest in the joint venture. The Company analyzes each joint venture initially to determine if it should be consolidated or unconsolidated.
Consolidated if the Company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, or holds the majority of voting interests of a non-VIE (and no significant participative rights are available to the other partners).
Unconsolidated if the Company is not the primary beneficiary of a VIE, or does not hold the majority of voting interest of a non-VIE.
Share-Based Payments
We measure the value of services received from employees and directors in exchange for an award of an equity instrument based on the grant-date fair value of the award. The computed value is recognized as a non-cash cost on a straight-line basis over the period the individual provides services, which is typically the vesting period of the award with the exception of the value of awards containing an internal performance measure, such as EPS growth and ROIC, which is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period subject to the probability of meeting the performance requirements and adjusted for the number of shares expected to be earned.
Accounting for Pension Plans
The accounting for pension plans requires the use of assumptions and estimates in order to calculate periodic pension cost and the value of the plans’ assets and liabilities. These assumptions include discount rates, investment returns and projected salary increases, among others. The actuarial assumptions used in determining the funded statuses of the plans are provided in Note 13 - Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Page 58


The expected rates of return on plan assets range from 2.3% to 7.5% for fiscal 2020 and 1.8% to 7% fiscal 2021. We believe the range of rates selected for fiscal 2020 reflects the long-term returns expected on the plans’ assets, considering recent market conditions, projected rates of inflation, the diversification of the plans’ assets, and the expected real rates of market returns. The discount rates used to compute plan liabilities decreased year over year with a range of 1.3% to 8.1% in fiscal 2019 and a range of 0.2% to 7.1% 2020. These assumptions represent the Company’s best estimate of the rates at which its pension obligations could be effectively settled.
Changes in the actuarial assumptions often have a material effect on the values assigned to plan assets and liabilities, and the associated pension expense. For example, if the discount rate used to value the net pension benefit obligation (“PBO”) at October 2, 2020 was higher by 0.5%, the PBO would have been lower at that date by approximately $212.4 million for non-U.S. plans, and by approximately $19.8 million for U.S. plans. If the expected return on plan assets was higher by 1.0%, the net periodic pension cost for fiscal 2020 would be lower by approximately $20.3 million for non-U.S. plans, and by approximately $3.4 million for U.S. plans. Differences between actuarial assumptions and actual performance (i.e., actuarial gains and losses) that are not recognized as a component of net periodic pension cost in the period in which such differences arise are recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and are recognized as part of net periodic pension cost in future periods in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Management monitors trends in the marketplace within which our pension plans operate in an effort to assure the fairness of the actuarial assumptions used.
Contractual Guarantees, Litigation, Investigations, and Insurance
In the normal course of business, we make contractual commitments, some of which are supported by separate guarantees; and on occasion we are a party in a litigation or arbitration proceeding. The litigation in which we are involved primarily includes personal injury claims, professional liability claims, and breach of contract claims. Where we provide a separate guarantee, it is strictly in support of the underlying contractual commitment. Guarantees take various forms including surety bonds required by law, or standby letters of credit ("LOC") (also referred to as “bank guarantees”) or corporate guarantees given to induce a party to enter into a contract with a subsidiary. Standby LOCs are also used as security for advance payments or in various other transactions. The guarantees have various expiration dates ranging from an arbitrary date to completion of our work (e.g., engineering only) to completion of the overall project. We record in the Consolidated Balance Sheets amounts representing our estimated liability relating to such guarantees, litigation and insurance claims. Guarantees are accounted for in accordance with ASC 460-10, Guarantees, at fair value at the inception of the guarantee.
We maintain insurance coverage for most insurable aspects of our business and operations. Our insurance programs have varying coverage limits depending upon the type of insurance, and include certain conditions and exclusions which insurance companies may raise in response to any claim that the Company brings. We have also elected to retain a portion of losses and liabilities that occur through the use of various deductibles, limits, and retentions under our insurance programs. As a result, we may be subject to a future liability for which we are only partially insured or completely uninsured. We intend to mitigate any such future liability by continuing to exercise prudent business judgment in negotiating the terms and conditions of the contracts which the Company enters with its clients. Our insurers are also subject to business risk and, as a result, one or more of them may be unable to fulfill their insurance obligations due to insolvency or otherwise.
Additionally, as a contractor providing services to the U.S. federal government we are subject to many types of audits, investigations, and claims by, or on behalf of, the government including with respect to contract performance, pricing, cost allocations, procurement practices, labor practices, and socioeconomic obligations. Furthermore, our income, franchise, and similar tax returns and filings are also subject to audit and investigation by the Internal Revenue Service, most states within the United States, as well as by various government agencies representing jurisdictions outside the United States.
Our Consolidated Balance Sheets include amounts representing our probable estimated liability relating to such claims, guarantees, litigation, audits, and investigations. Our estimates of probable liabilities require us to make assumptions related to potential losses regarding our determination of amounts considered probable and estimable. We perform an analysis to determine the level of reserves to establish for insurance-related claims that are known and have been asserted against us, as well as for insurance-related claims that are believed to have been incurred based on actuarial analysis, but have not yet been reported to our claims administrators as of the respective balance sheet dates. We include any adjustments to such insurance reserves in our consolidated results of operations. Insurance recoveries are recorded as assets if recovery is probable and estimated liabilities are not reduced by expected insurance recoveries.
Page 59


The Company believes, after consultation with counsel, that such guarantees, litigation, U.S. government contract-related audits, investigations and claims, and income tax audits and investigations should not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements, beyond amounts currently accrued.
Testing Goodwill for Possible Impairment
The goodwill carried on our Consolidated Balance Sheets is tested annually for possible impairment, and on an interim basis if indicators of possible impairment exist. For purposes of impairment testing, goodwill is assigned to the applicable reporting units based on the current reporting structure. In performing the annual impairment test, we evaluate our goodwill at the reporting unit level. The Company performs the annual goodwill impairment test for the reporting units at the beginning of the fourth quarter of its fiscal year.
U.S. GAAP does not prescribe a specific valuation method for estimating the fair value of reporting units. Any valuation technique used to estimate the fair value of a reporting unit requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including revenue growth rates, operating margins, discount rates and future market conditions, among others.
We used income and market approaches to test our goodwill for possible impairment which requires us to make estimates and judgments. Under the income approach, fair value is determined by using the discounted cash flows of our reporting units. The Company’s discount rate reflects a weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”) for a peer group of companies representative of the Company’s respective reporting units. Under the market approach, the fair values of our reporting units are determined by reference to guideline companies that are reasonably comparable to our reporting units; the fair values are estimated based on the valuation multiples of the invested capital associated with the guideline companies. In assessing whether there is an indication that the carrying value of goodwill has been impaired, we utilize the results of both valuation techniques and consider the range of fair values indicated.
It is possible that changes in market conditions, economy, facts and circumstances, judgments and assumptions used in estimating the fair value could change, resulting in possible impairment of goodwill in the future. The fair values resulting from the valuation techniques used are not necessarily representative of the values we might obtain in a sale of the reporting units to willing third parties.
We have determined that the fair value of our reporting units substantially exceeded their respective carrying values for the Consolidated Balance Sheets presented.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Our long-lived assets other than goodwill principally consist of right-of-use lease assets, property, equipment and improvements, and finite-lived intangible assets. These long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment for each of our asset groups in accordance with ASC 360 by first identifying whether indicators of impairment exist. If such indicators are present, we assess long-lived asset groups for recoverability based on estimated future undiscounted cash flows. For asset groups where the client electsrecoverability test fails, the fair value of each asset group is then estimated and compared to payits carrying amount. An impairment loss is recognized for such items directlythe amount by which an asset group’s carrying value exceeds its fair value.
Page 60


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
For the Fiscal Years Ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and we have no associated responsibility for such items, these amountsSeptember 28, 2018
(In thousands, except per share information)
October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Revenues$13,566,975 $12,737,868 $10,579,773 
Direct cost of contracts(10,980,307)(10,260,840)(8,421,223)
Gross profit2,586,668 2,477,028 2,158,550 
Selling, general and administrative expenses(2,050,695)(2,072,177)(1,771,107)
Operating Profit535,973 404,851 387,443 
Other Income (Expense):
Interest income4,729 9,487 8,984 
Interest expense(62,206)(83,847)(76,760)
Miscellaneous (expense) income, net(37,293)20,468 11,314 
Total other expense, net(94,770)(53,892)(56,462)
Earnings from Continuing Operations Before Taxes441,203 350,959 330,981 
Income Tax Expense for Continuing Operations(55,320)(36,954)(325,632)
Net Earnings of the Group from Continuing Operations385,883 314,005 5,349 
Net Earnings of the Group from Discontinued Operations137,984 559,214 167,793 
Net Earnings of the Group523,867 873,219 173,142 
Net Earnings Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests from Continuing Operations(32,022)(23,045)(9,534)
Net Earnings (Loss) Attributable to Jacobs from Continuing Operations353,861 290,960 (4,185)
Net Earnings Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests from Discontinued Operations— (2,195)(177)
Net Earnings Attributable to Jacobs from Discontinued Operations137,984 557,019 167,616 
Net Earnings Attributable to Jacobs$491,845 $847,979 $163,431 
Net Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
Basic Net Earnings (Loss) from Continuing Operations Per Share$2.69 $2.11 $(0.03)
Basic Net Earnings from Discontinued Operations Per Share$1.05 $4.03 $1.21 
Basic Earnings Per Share$3.74 $6.14 $1.18 
Diluted Net Earnings (Loss) from Continuing Operations Per Share$2.67 $2.09 $(0.03)
Diluted Net Earnings from Discontinued Operations Per Share$1.04 $4.00 $1.21 
Diluted Earnings Per Share$3.71 $6.08 $1.18 
Page 61



2020 Overview
COVID-19 Pandemic. There are not considered pass-through costsmany risks and are, therefore, not reflected in either revenues or costs. Touncertainties regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, including the anticipated duration of the pandemic and the extent of local and worldwide social, political, and economic disruption it may cause. The Company’s operations for the last three quarters of fiscal 2020 were adversely impacted by COVID-19. While certain business units of both Critical Mission Solutions and People & Places Solutions have experienced, and may continue to experience, an increase in demand for certain of their services regarding new projects that we incur a significant amount of passthrough costsmay arise in a period, our direct costs of contracts areresponse to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is still expected that COVID-19 is likely to continue to have an adverse impact on each of Critical Missions Solutions and People & Places Solutions in fiscal 2021, although to a lesser degree than what was seen in 2020.
Please refer to Item 1A - Risk Factors, for a discussion of risks and uncertainties related to COVID-19, including the potential impacts on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Net earnings attributable to the Company from continuing operations for fiscal 2020 were $353.9 million (or $2.67 per diluted share), an increase of $62.9 million, or 21.6%, from $291.0 million (or $2.09 per diluted share) for the prior year. Included in the Company’s operating results for the current year were $56.9 million (or $0.43 per share) in after tax fair value losses recorded in miscellaneous income (expense), net, associated with our investment in Worley stock (net of Worley stock dividend) and certain foreign currency revaluations relating to the ECR sale and $248.2 million in after-tax Restructuring and other charges and transaction costs associated in part with the Company's fourth quarter fiscal 2020 transformation initiatives relating to real estate and other staffing programs which are discussed in Note 16- Restructuring and Other Charges. Also, fiscal 2020 results were impacted by charges associated with the Company's acquisition of John Wood Groups' nuclear consulting, remediation and program management business along with charges relating to the integration of the KeyW and CH2M acquisitions and the sale of ECR. Our fiscal 2019 results included $259.8 million (or $1.86 per share) in after-tax Restructuring and other charges and transactions costs associated with the Company's KeyW and CH2M acquisitions and the ECR sale. Also included in the fiscal 2019 net earnings from continuing operations are $48.1 million in after-tax fair value losses associated with our investment in Worley stock (net of Worley stock dividend) and certain foreign currency revaluations relating to ECR sale proceeds. Income tax expense for continuing operations for fiscal 2020 was $55.3 million, an increase of $18.4 million, or 49.7%, from $37.0 million in the prior year. Key drivers for this year-over-year increase in the effective tax rate include a reduction in valuation allowance releases in fiscal year 2020, as well.

well as an increase in tax on foreign earnings in the U.S.

    Net earnings attributable to Jacobs from discontinued operations for fiscal 2020 were $138.0 million (or $1.04 per diluted share), a decrease of $419.0 million, or 75.2%, from $557.0 million (or $4.00 per diluted share) for the prior year. Included in net earnings attributable to the Company from discontinued operations for the current year was an expense reduction for the settlement of the Nui Phao ("NPMC") legal matter described in Note 17- Commitments and Contingencies and Derivative Financial Instruments that was reimbursed by insurance, the recognition of the deferred gain for the delayed conveyance of the international entities and for the delivery of the ECR IT assets, as discussed in Note 15- Sale of Energy, Chemicals and Resources ("ECR") Business and adjustments for working capital and certain other items in connection with the ECR sale. Additionally, the year-over-year change was also driven by the gain on sale recognized in the fiscal 2019 period and the absence of normal operating results of the ECR business as reported in the prior year. Included in the current year results from discontinued operations is the pre-tax gain on sale of the ECR business of $110.2 million. Included in prior year results from discontinued operations is the pre-tax gain on the sale of the ECR business of $935.1 million, see Note 15- Sale of Energy, Chemicals and Resources ("ECR") Business.
On March 6, 2020, a subsidiary of Jacobs completed the acquisition of the nuclear consulting, remediation and program management business of John Wood Group for an enterprise value of £246 million, or approximately $317.9 million, less cash acquired of $24.3 million. On June 12, 2019, we acquired KeyW, a U.S. based national security solutions provider to the intelligence, cyber, and counterterrorism communities. On December 15, 2017, we acquired CH2M, a provider of international engineering, construction and technical services.
Backlog at October 2, 2020 was $23.8 billion, up $1.2 billion, from $22.6 billion for the prior year. New prospects and new sales remain strong and the Company continues to have a positive outlook for many of the industry groups and sectors in which our clients operate.
Results of Operations
Page 62


Fiscal 2020 Compared to Fiscal 2019
Revenues for the year ended October 2, 2020 were $13.57 billion, an increase of $829.1 million, or 6.5%, from $12.74 billion for the prior year. The increase in revenues was due primarily to the a full year of revenues in fiscal 2020 from the KeyW acquisition completed in June 2019, impacts from the March 2020 John Wood Group nuclear business acquisition and growth in our legacy People & Places Solutions businesses, offset in part by impacts from the COVID 19 pandemic. Also, our revenues were impacted by an extra week of activity in fiscal 2020, see Note 1- Description of Business and Basis of Presentation in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Pass-through costs included in revenues for the year ended September 29, 2017October 2, 2020 were $2.54$2.61 billion in comparison to $2.49$2.54 billion in line with amounts in the corresponding period lastprior year. In general, pass-through costs are more significant on projects that have a higher content of field services activities. Pass-through costs are generally incurred at specific points during the life cycle of a project and are highly dependent on the needs of our individual clients and the nature of the clients’ projects. However, because we have hundreds of projects which start at various times within a fiscal year, the effect of pass-through costs on the level of direct costs of contracts can vary between fiscal years without there being a fundamental or significant change to the underlying business.

As a percentage of revenues, direct costs of contracts

Gross profit for the year ended September 29, 2017October 2, 2020 was 82.3%. This compares to 83.9%$2.59 billion, up $109.6 million, or 4.4%, from $2.48 billion for the prior year. Our gross profit margins were 19.1% and 19.4% for the years ended October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019, respectively. The increase in our gross profit was attributable to favorable impacts from the KeyW and John Wood Group nuclear business acquisitions, also impacted by the extra week of activity in fiscal 2020. The slight differences in year ended September 30, 2016. The relationship between direct costs of contractsover year gross margin trends were attributable mainly to legacy portfolio mix and revenues will fluctuate between reporting periods dependinglower overhead rate impacts on a variety of factors including the mix ofrevenue, with partial offsets from favorable margin trends from our recent KeyW and John Wood Group nuclear business during the reporting periods being comparedacquisitions and as well as year over year impacts from lower overhead reimbursement rates resulting from our ongoing cost reduction programs partially offset by COVID-19 cost mitigation efforts.
See Segment Financial Information discussion for further information on the levelCompany’s results of margins earned fromoperations at the various types of services provided. Generally, the more procurement we do on behalf of our clients (e.g., where we purchase equipment and materials for use on projects and/or procure subcontracts in connection with projects) and the more field services revenues we have relative to technical, professional services revenues, the higher the ratio will be of direct costs of contracts to revenues. Because revenues from pass-through cost arrangements typically have lower margin rates associated with them, it is not unusual for us to experience an increase or decrease in such revenues without experiencing a proportionate increase or decrease in our gross margins and operating profit. The reduction in cost relative to revenue is driven by both 1) our strategic focus on realigning our portfolio to higher profit businesses and 2) a reduction in field services revenue, which tends to have a lower margin, as a percent of total revenue resulting in higher margin overall.

segment level.

Selling, general & administrative expenses for the year ended September 29, 2017October 2, 2020 were $1,380.0 million,$2.05 billion, a decrease of $49.2$21.5 million, or 3.4%1.0%, from $1,429.2 million$2.07 billion for the corresponding period lastprior year. The decrease in SG&A expenses foras compared to the comparative annual periodsprior year was due mainlyprimarily to lower Restructuringless expense relating to the Transition Services Agreement (the "TSA") with Worley, which expired in April 2020, although the parties agreed to extend certain of the services beyond the initial term, and reductions in personnel related and other overhead costs resulting from our ongoing cost reduction programs as well as COVID-19 cost mitigation efforts, partially offset by incremental SG&A expenses from the KeyW and John Wood Group nuclear business acquisitions and the extra week of activity in fiscal 2020. Also, included in the current year results were $325.1 million of restructuring and other charges of $75.9 million and related savings from the 2015 Restructuring.  These decreases were offsettransaction costs associated in part by higherwith the Company's fourth quarter fiscal 2020 transformation initiatives relating to real estate and other staffing programs, and the Company's acquisition of John Wood Groups' nuclear business. In comparison, the prior year over year spending mainly in personnel related costsincluded $350.3 million of restructuring and professional service fees, including an additional $17other charges and transaction costs. Favorable impacts on SG&A expenses from foreign exchange were $3.2 million associated with CH2M professional service fees and integration costs.

Page 44


for the current year.

Net interest expense for the year ended September 29, 2017October 2, 2020 was $3.3$57.5 million, a decrease of $4.1$16.9 million from $7.4$74.4 million for the corresponding period lastprior year. The decrease in net interest expense year over year is primarily due to the paydown of debt subsequent to the ECR sale in the prior year third quarter.
Miscellaneous income (expense), net for the year ended September 29, 2017October 2, 2020 was $(37.3) million, a decrease of $57.8 million as compared to $20.5 million in income for the corresponding period lastprior year. The decrease from the prior year was due primarily to $74.5 million in pre-tax unrealized losses associated with changes in the reversalfair value of $2.5 millionour investment in Worley stock (net of accrued interest expense relatedWorley stock dividend) and certain foreign currency revaluations relating to the statute expirationECR sale in the current year, compared to $64.8 million in the prior year. Also included in miscellaneous (expense) income during the current year is $15.8 million in TSA-related income associated with the ECR sale compared to $35.4 million in the prior year, as discussed in Note 15- Sale of a foreign tax reserve as well as higher levels of interest income.

Miscellaneous expense,Energy, Chemicals and Resources ("ECR") Business. Further,miscellaneous income (expense), net for the year ended September 29, 2017 was ($6.6)27, 2019 included a one-time gain on the settlement of the CH2M retiree medical plan of $35.0 million.

Net earnings attributable to Jacobs from discontinued operations for fiscal 2020 were $138.0 million as compared to ($3.1)(or $1.04 per diluted share), a decrease of $419.0 million, or 75.2%, from $557.0 million (or $4.00 per diluted share) for the corresponding period lastprior year. This change was due primarily to a reversalIncluded in fiscal 2016 of $5.1 million of accrued penalties related to the statute expiration of a foreign tax reserve, which did not recur in fiscal 2017, offset in part by other miscellaneous charges.  

Gain/(Loss) on disposal of business and investments was $10.9 million and $(41.4) million for the years ended September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016, respectively.  The reported amounts for fiscal 2017 were associated mainly with the Company’s divestiture of its equity investment in Neste Jacobs Oy, a joint venture between the Company and Neste Corporation.  The $(41.4) million loss on disposal in fiscal 2016 was mainlynet earnings attributable to the Company’s lossCompany from discontinued operations for the current year was an expense reduction for the settlement of the Nui Phao ("NPMC") legal matter described in Note 17- Commitments and Contingencies and Derivative Financial Instruments that was reimbursed by insurance, the recognition of the deferred gain

Page 63


for the delayed conveyance of the international entities and for the delivery of the ECR IT assets, as discussed in Note 15- Sale of Energy, Chemicals and Resources ("ECR") Business and adjustments for working capital and certain other items in connection with the ECR sale. Additionally, the year-over-year change was also driven by the gain on sale recognized in the fiscal 2019 period and the absence of normal operating results of the ECR business as reported in the prior year. Included in the current year results from discontinued operations is the pre-tax gain on sale of the ECR business of $110.2 million. Included in prior year results from discontinued operations is the pre-tax gain on the sale of our French subsidiarythe ECR business of $24.4$935.1 million, see Note 15- Sale of Energy, Chemicals and a non-cash write-off on an equity investment of $17.0 million.

Resources ("ECR") Business.

The Company’s consolidated effective income tax rate of 12.5% is generally lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35% primarily due to a $16.9 million benefit from foreign valuation allowance releases, $26.5 million of foreign tax generated in the impactscurrent year, a benefit of favorable$7.3 million from the application of the Internal Revenue Code Section 179D, a reduction in uncertain tax positions of $11.3 million and benefits from tax rate differenceschanges and stock compensation. These decreases in ourtax expense were offset by $43.0 million of U.S. foreign inclusions within U.S. tax costs of foreign operations.
The following table reconciles total income tax expense on continuing operations using the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate to the consolidated income tax expense on continuing operations shown in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended September 29, 2017October 2, 2020 and September 30, 201627, 2019 (dollars in thousands):

 

For the Years Ended

 

For the Years Ended

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

%

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

%

 

October 2, 2020%September 27, 2019%

Statutory amount

 

$

137,626

 

 

35.0

%

 

$

100,353

 

 

35.0

%

Statutory amount$92,652 21.0 %$73,701 21.0 %

State taxes, net of the federal benefit

 

 

8,955

 

 

2.3

%

 

 

7,853

 

 

2.7

%

State taxes, net of the federal benefit7,2541.6 %10,183 2.9 %

Exclusion of tax on non-controlling interests

 

 

2,223

 

 

0.6

%

 

 

(1,418

)

 

(0.5

%)

Exclusion of tax on non-controlling interests(6,622)(1.5)%(4,839)(1.4)%

Foreign:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign:  

Difference in tax rates of foreign operations

 

 

(16,987

)

 

(4.3

%

 

)

 

(17,184

)

 

(6.0

%)

Difference in tax rates of foreign operations(6,267)(1.4)%1,083 0.3 %

Benefit from foreign valuation allowance

release

 

 

(3,085

)

 

(0.8

%

 

)

 

(11,182

)

 

(3.9

%)

Benefit from foreign valuation allowance release(16,861)(3.8)%(29,125)(8.3)%

U.K. tax rate change on deferred tax assets

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

8,853

 

 

3.1

%

Nontaxable income from foreign affiliate

 

 

(3,280

)

 

(0.8

%

)

 

 

 

0.0

%

U.S. tax cost of foreign operations

 

 

18,612

 

 

4.7

%

 

 

30,850

 

 

10.9

%

U.S. tax cost (benefit) of foreign operationsU.S. tax cost (benefit) of foreign operations42,992 9.7 %(17,760)(5.1)%

Tax differential on foreign earnings

 

 

(4,740

)

 

(1.2

%

)

 

11,337

 

 

4.1

%

Tax differential on foreign earnings19,864 4.5 %(45,802)(13.1)%

Foreign tax credits

 

 

(20,454

)

 

(5.2

%

 

)

 

(44,018

)

 

(15.4

%)

Foreign tax credits(26,471)(6.0)%(15,682)(4.5)%
Tax Rate ChangeTax Rate Change(6,811)(1.5)%— — 
Tax reformTax reform— %36,674 10.4 %
Valuation allowanceValuation allowance— %(207)(0.1)%

Uncertain tax positions

 

 

(5,779

)

 

(1.5

%

)

 

1,449

 

 

0.5

%

Uncertain tax positions(11,338)(2.6)%(6,883)(2.0)%

Other items:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other items:

IRS §179D deduction

 

 

(3,351

)

 

(0.8

%

)

 

(2,153

)

 

(0.8

%)

IRS §179D deduction(7,267)(1.6)%(2,957)(0.8)%

IRS §199D deduction

 

 

(2,113

)

 

(0.5

%

)

 

(2,800

)

 

(1.0

%)

Foreign partnership loss

 

 

(9,861

)

 

(2.5

%

)

 

(2,658

)

 

(0.9

%)

Disallowed officer compensationDisallowed officer compensation5,0811.2 %5,568 1.6 %
Stock compensationStock compensation(10,234)(2.3)%(7,864)(2.2)%
Foreign partnership income/(loss)Foreign partnership income/(loss)— — %— — %

Other items – net

 

 

3,336

 

 

0.7

%

 

 

4,263

 

 

1.5

%

Other items – net(788)(0.2)%(4,938)(1.4)%

Total other items

 

 

(11,989

)

 

(3.1

%

)

 

(3,348

)

 

(1.2

%)

Total other items(13,208)(3.0)%(10,191)(2.8)%

Taxes on income

 

$

105,842

 

 

26.9

%

 

$

72,208

 

 

25.2

%

Taxes on income from continuing operationsTaxes on income from continuing operations$55,320 12.5 %$36,954 10.5 %

The Company’s consolidated effective income tax rate for the year ended September 29, 2017October 2, 2020 increased to 26.9%12.5% from 25.2%10.5% for fiscal 2016.2019. Key drivers for this year over year increase in the effective tax rate include the impacts of lower foreign tax credit benefits and lower benefits froma reduction in valuation allowance releases in fiscal 2020, as well as an increase in tax on foreign deferred tax assets, partly offset by favorable impacts of U.S. tax cost of foreign operations, the non-recurrence of 2016 tax rate change impacts on deferred income tax assetsearnings in the UK and favorable impacts from change in uncertain tax positions.

U.S.

Fiscal 20162019 Compared to Fiscal 2015

Total2018

Revenues for the year ended September 27, 2019, were $12.74 billion, an increase of $2.16 billion, or 20.4%, from $10.58 billion for the corresponding period in 2018. The increase in revenues was due primarily to the CH2M acquisition in December fiscal 2018 included in fiscal 2019 for the full year, impacts from the KeyW acquisition included in the fiscal 2019 results since closing in mid-June and growth in our legacy CMS and P&PS businesses.
Page 64


Pass-through costs included in revenues for the year ended September 30, 2016,27, 2019 were $10.96$2.54 billion a decreasein comparison to $2.25 billion in the prior year. These year-over-year increases are due primarily to impacts from the CH2M acquisition included for the full year of $1.15fiscal 2019.
Gross profit for the year ended September 27, 2019 was $2.48 billion, an increase of $318.5 million, or 9.5%,14.8% from $12.11$2.16 billion for the corresponding period last year.in 2018. Our gross profit margins were 19.4% and 20.4% for the years ended September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018, respectively. Revenue mix primarily drove the lower gross profit and margin for the year over year periods.
Selling, general & administrative expenses for the year ended September 27, 2019 were $2.07 billion, an increase of $0.30 billion, or 17.0%, from $1.77 billion for the corresponding period in 2018. The decreaseincrease in revenuesSG&A expenses is due mainly to incremental SG&A expense from the CH2M and KeyW businesses acquired. Also, included in the 2019 results were $350.3 million of restructuring and other charges and transaction costs, as well as higher personnel related costs year over year due in part to costs to service the TSA with Worley. In comparison, the prior year included $230.5 million of restructuring and other charges and transaction costs.
Net interest expense for the year ended September 27, 2019 was $74.4 million, an increase of $6.6 million from $67.8 million for the corresponding period in 2018. The increase in net interest expense as compared to the corresponding period in 2018 was due primarily to lower volumeshigher levels of debt outstanding and our fixed rate notes having been outstanding for the full year of fiscal 2019 and only five months in fiscal 2018.
Miscellaneous income (expense), net for the

Page 45


Petroleum & Chemicals, Aerospace & Technology year ended September 27, 2019 was $20.5 million, an increase of $9.2 million, as compared to $11.3 million for the corresponding period in 2018. The increase was due primarily to the gain on the settlement of the CH2M retiree medical plan of $35.0 million and Buildings & Infrastructure LOBs, partiallyincome from the TSA with Worley of $35.4 million, offset by $64.8 million, net, relating to ECR related fair value adjustments (unrealized losses) and dividend income related to our investment in Worley stock and certain foreign currency revaluations relating to ECR sale proceeds.

Net earnings of the group from discontinued operations was $559.2 million for the year ended September 27, 2019, an increase in the Industrial LOB.

Direct costs of contracts decreased $1.0 billion, or 9.4%,$391.4 million from $10.1 billion during fiscal 2015 to $9.2 billion during fiscal 2016. Direct costs of contracts include all costs incurred in connection with and directly$167.8 million for the benefit of client contracts, including depreciation and amortization relating to assets usedcorresponding period in connection with providing the services required by client projects. The level of direct costs of contracts may fluctuate between reporting periods due to a variety of factors including the amount of pass-through costs we incur during a period. On those projects where we are responsible for subcontract labor or third party materials and equipment, we reflect the amounts of such items in both revenues and costs (and we refer to such costs as “pass-through costs”). On other projects, where the client elects to pay for such items directly and we have no associated responsibility for such items, these amounts are not considered pass-through costs and are, therefore, not reflected in either revenues or costs. To the extent that we incur a significant amount of pass-through costs in a period, our direct cost of contracts are likely to increase as well.  The decrease in direct costs of contracts between fiscal years 2015 and 2016 is primarily a result of the general decline in our business.

Pass-through costs decreased $112.7 million, or 4.3%, from $2.6 billion during fiscal 2015 to $2.5 billion for fiscal 2016. In general, pass-through costs are more significant on projects that have a higher content of field services activities. Pass-through costs are generally incurred at a specific point in the lifecycle of a project and are highly dependent on the needs of our individual clients and the nature of the clients’ projects. However, because we have hundreds of projects, which start at various times within a fiscal year, the effect of pass-through costs on the level of direct costs of contracts, can vary between fiscal years without there being a fundamental or significant change to the underlying business.

As a percentage of revenues, direct costs of contracts were 83.9% for fiscal 2016, compared to 83.8% for fiscal 2015. The relationship between direct costs of contracts and revenues will fluctuate between reporting periods depending on a variety of factors including the mix of business during the reporting periods being compared as well as the level of margins earned from the various types of services provided. Generally speaking, the more procurement we do on behalf of our clients (i.e., where we purchase equipment and materials for use on projects, and/or procure subcontracts in connection with projects) and the more field services revenues we have relative to technical, professional services revenues, the higher the ratio will be of direct costs of contracts to revenues. Because revenues from pass-through costs typically have lower margin rates associated with them, it is not unusual for us to experience an increase or decrease in such revenues without experiencing a corresponding increase or decrease in our gross margins and operating profit. The ratio of direct costs of contracts to revenues was flat over the prior year period.  The Company experienced a slight decrease in margins in fiscal 2016 when compared to fiscal 2015.

SG&A expenses for fiscal 2016 decreased by $93.6 million, or 6%, to $1.43 billion, compared to $1.52 billion for fiscal 2015. The decrease in SG&A expenses was primarily due to higher SG&A savings associated with the 2015 Restructuring.  Excluding the effects of the 2015 Restructuring in both fiscal 2016 and 2015, adjusted SG&A expenses for fiscal 2016 decreased $126.9 million, or 9%, to $1.24 billion from $1.37 billion in fiscal 2015.

Net interest expense for fiscal 2016 decreased $4.8 million to $7.4 million from $12.2 million in fiscal 2015.2018. Included in net interest expense for fiscal 20162019 was a reversal of $2.7 million of accrued interest expense related to the expiration of the statutue of limitations relating to a foreign tax reserve.  Interest expense for fiscal 2016 was also lower when compared to the same period last year due to lower debt levels.

Loss on disposal of business and investments for fiscal 2016 increased by $38.5 million to $41.4 million from $2.9 million in fiscal 2015.  The increase is due to the previously discussed fiscal 2016 loss itemspre-tax gain on the sale of our French subsidiarythe ECR business of $24.4$935.1 million, andoffset in part by a non-cash write-off on ancharge for the final settlement of the Nui Phao legal matter. The 2018 fiscal year included a $21.0 million loss associated with the disposal of the Company's equity investment of $17.0 million.

Miscellaneous expense for fiscal 2016 increased $2.8 million to $3.1 million from $0.2 million in fiscal 2015.  The increase over the prior year period was primarily due to realized exchange rate losses.  Included in miscellaneous expense for fiscal 2016 was a reversal of $5.1 million of accrued penalties related to the expiration of the statute of limitations relating to a foreign tax reserve.

its Guimar joint venture.

Page 46

65


The Company’s consolidated effective income tax rate is generallywas lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35%21.0% primarily due to a $29.1 million benefit from foreign valuation allowance releases in fiscal 2019, $15.7 million of foreign tax and other credits generated in fiscal 2019 and a reduction in the impactstax contingency reserves of favorable$6.9 million. The decreases in tax rate differences in our foreign operations.  expense were offset by a $36.7 million charge from the remeasurement of net deferred tax assets and other miscellaneous U.S. tax reform changes. The following table reconciles total income tax expense on continuing operations using the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate to the consolidated income tax expense on continuing operations shown in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended September 30, 201627, 2019 and October 2, 2015September 28, 2018 (dollars in thousands):


 

For the Years Ended

 

For the Years Ended

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

%

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

 

%

 

September 27, 2019%September 28, 2018%

Statutory amount

 

 

100,353

 

 

35.0

%

 

$

150,548

 

 

35.0

%

Statutory amount$73,701 21.0 %$81,421 24.6 %

State taxes, net of the federal benefit

 

 

7,853

 

 

2.7

%

 

 

12,857

 

 

3.0

%

State taxes, net of the federal benefit10,183 2.9 %15,772 4.8 %

Exclusion of tax on non-controlling interests

 

 

(1,418

)

 

(0.5

%

)

 

(9,069

)

 

(2.1

%)

Exclusion of tax on non-controlling interests(4,839)(1.4)%(2,389)(0.7)%

Foreign:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign:    

Difference in tax rates of foreign operations

 

 

(17,184

)

 

(6.0

%

 

)

 

(19,180)

 

 

 

(4.5

%)

Difference in tax rates of foreign operations1,083 0.3 %2,815 0.9 %

Benefit from foreign valuation allowance

release

 

 

(11,182

)

 

(3.9

%

 

)

 

(3,372

)

 

 

(0.8

%)

Benefit from foreign valuation allowance release(29,125)(8.3)%(5,088)(1.5)%

Tax deductible foreign currency loss

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

(23,100

)

 

(5.4

%)

U.K. tax rate change on deferred tax assets

 

 

8,853

 

 

3.1

%

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

U.S. tax cost of foreign operations

 

 

30,850

 

 

10.9

%

 

 

6,814

 

 

1.6

%

U.S. tax cost (benefit) of foreign operationsU.S. tax cost (benefit) of foreign operations(17,760)(5.1)%4,030 1.2 %

Tax differential on foreign earnings

 

 

11,337

 

 

4.1

%

 

 

(38,838

)

 

(9.0

%)

Tax differential on foreign earnings(45,802)(13.1)%1,757 0.6 %

Foreign tax credits

 

 

(44,018

)

 

(15.4

%

 

)

 

(21,313

)

 

 

(5.0

%)

Foreign tax credits(15,682)(4.5)%(21,735)(6.6)%
Tax reformTax reform36,674 10.4 %155,756 47.1 %
Valuation allowanceValuation allowance(207)(0.1)%104,221 31.5 %

Uncertain tax positions

 

 

1,449

 

 

0.5

%

 

 

2,281

 

 

0.5

%

Uncertain tax positions(6,883)(2.0)%(1,402)(0.4)%

Other items:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other items:

IRS §179D deduction

 

 

(2,153

)

 

(0.8

%

)

 

 

 

0.0

%

IRS §179D deduction(2,957)(0.8)%(4,557)(1.4)%

IRS §199D deduction

 

 

(2,800

)

 

(1.0

%

)

 

(4,582

)

 

(1.1

%)

Foreign partnership (loss)/income

 

 

(2,658

)

 

(0.9

%

)

 

11,858

 

 

2.8

%

Disallowed officer compensationDisallowed officer compensation5,568 1.6 %1,510 0.5 %
Stock compensationStock compensation(7,864)(2.2)%(2,158)(0.7)%

Other items – net

 

 

4,263

 

 

1.5

%

 

 

(2,487

)

 

(0.6

%)

Other items – net(4,938)(1.4)%(2,564)(0.8)%

Total other items

 

 

(3,348

)

 

(1.2

%

)

 

4,789

 

 

1.1

%

Total other items(10,191)(2.8)%(7,769)(2.4)%

Taxes on income

 

 

72,208

 

 

25.2

%

 

$

101,255

 

 

23.5

%

Taxes on income from continuing operationsTaxes on income from continuing operations$36,954 10.5 %$325,632 98.4 %

The Company’s consolidated effective income tax rate for the year ended September 30, 2016 increased27, 2019 decreased to 25.2%10.5% from 23.5%98.4% for fiscal 2015.  The primary components of2018. Key drivers for this increaseyear over year decrease in the effective tax rate were due mainly to unfavorable impacts frominclude a reduction of $119.1 million associated with remeasurement of U.S. tax cost of foreign operations, the non-recurrence of tax deductible foreign currency losses in fiscal 2015, unfavorable impacts from U.K. tax rates changes on deferred tax assetsitems due to tax reform and other unfavorable items.  These unfavorable impacts ona decrease in the tax rate were partly offset by favorableamount charged for valuation allowance related to foreign tax credits year over year, favorable income levels from our foreign partnerships in 2016 and comparably higher benefits from foreign valuation allowance releases in fiscal 2016.

of $104.4 million.

Page 66


Segment Financial Information

The following table provides selected financial informationtables present total revenues and segment operating profit for our operating segmentseach reportable segment (in thousands) and includes a reconciliation of segment operating profit to total U.S. GAAP operating profit by including certain corporate-level expenses and expenses relating to Restructuring, transaction and other charges and CH2M professional fees and integration costs (in thousands).

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

September 29, 2017

 

September 30, 2016

 

October 2, 2015

 

Revenues from External Customers:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace & Technology

$

2,360,613

 

$

2,657,433

 

$

2,924,753

 

Buildings & Infrastructure

 

2,452,321

 

 

2,253,512

 

 

2,458,379

 

Industrial

 

2,743,662

 

 

2,793,713

 

 

2,517,571

 

Petroleum & Chemicals

 

2,466,192

 

 

3,259,499

 

 

4,214,129

 

Total

$

10,022,788

 

$

10,964,157

 

$

12,114,832

 

Page 47


 

 

For the Years Ended

 

September 29, 2017

 

September 30, 2016

 

October 2, 2015

 

Operating Profit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace & Technology

$

202,595

 

$

203,808

 

$

205,368

 

Buildings & Infrastructure (1)

 

193,455

 

 

174,648

 

 

145,299

 

Industrial

 

115,262

 

 

81,268

 

 

126,531

 

Petroleum & Chemicals

 

113,858

 

 

126,604

 

 

138,351

 

Total Segment Operating Profit

 

625,170

 

 

586,328

 

 

615,549

 

Other Corporate Expenses

 

(81,595

)

 

(60,100

)

 

(15,739

)

Restructuring and Other Charges

 

(134,206

)

 

(187,630

)

 

(154,283

)

CH2M Professional Fees and Integration Costs

 

(17,100

)

 

 

 

 

Total U.S. GAAP Operating Profit

 

392,269

 

 

338,598

 

 

445,527

 

Gain/(Loss) on disposal of business and investments

 

10,880

 

 

(41,410

)

 

(2,909

)

Total Other (Expense) income (2)

 

(9,932

)

 

(10,465

)

 

(12,481

)

Earnings Before Taxes

$

393,217

 

$

286,723

 

$

430,137

 

(1)

Excludes $23,844 in Restructuring and other charges for the fiscal year ended September 29, 2017.

Prior period information has been recast to reflect the current period presentation.

(2)

Years ending September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016 include Restructuring and other charges of $1,233 and $277, respectively.

For the Years Ended
October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Revenues from External Customers:
Critical Mission Solutions$4,965,952 $4,551,162 $3,725,365 
People & Places Solutions8,601,023 8,186,706 6,854,408 
              Total$13,566,975 $12,737,868 $10,579,773 


For the Years Ended
October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Segment Operating Profit:
Critical Mission Solutions (1)$372,070 $310,043 $255,718 
People & Places Solutions (2)740,707 714,394 527,900 
Total Segment Operating Profit1,112,777 1,024,437 783,618 
Other Corporate Expenses (3)(249,391)(264,351)(161,788)
Restructuring, Transaction and Other Charges(327,413)(355,235)(234,387)
Total U.S. GAAP Operating Profit535,973 404,851 387,443 
Total Other (Expense) Income, net (4)(94,770)(53,892)(56,462)
Earnings from Continuing Operations Before Taxes$441,203 $350,959 $330,981 

(1)Includes $15.0 million in charges during the year ended September 28, 2018 associated with a legal matter.
(2)Includes $25.0 million in charges associated with a certain project for the year ended September 27, 2019.
(3)Other corporate expenses include costs that were previously allocated to the ECR segment prior to discontinued operations presentation in connection with the ECR sale in the approximate amount of $— million, $14.8 million and $25.6 million for the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018, respectively. Also includes intangibles amortization of $90.6 million, $79.1 million and $68.1 million for the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018, respectively.
(4)For the years ended October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019, other expenses includes revenues under the Company's TSA with Worley of $15.8 million and $35.4 million, respectively, $74.3 million and $64.8 million in fair value adjustments related to our investment in Worley stock (net of Worley Stock dividends) and certain foreign currency revaluations relating to ECR sale proceeds, respectively. Also included for the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018 is amortization of deferred financing fees related to the CH2M acquisition of $0.7 million, $3.2 million and $1.8 million respectively. Lastly, includes loss on settlement of U.S. pension plan of $2.7 million for the year ended October 2, 2020 and includes gain on settlement of the CH2M retiree medical plans of $35.0 million for the year ended September 27, 2019.
In evaluating the Company’s performance by operating segment, the CODM reviews various metrics and statistical data for each LOBLine Of Business ("LOB") but focuses primarily on revenues and operating profit. As discussed above, segment operating profit includes not only local SG&A expenses but the SG&A expenses of the Company’s support groups that have been allocated to the segments. In addition, the Company attributes each LOB’s specific incentive compensation plan costs to the LOBs. The revenues of certain LOBsthe People & Places Solutions LOB are more affected by pass-through revenues than other LOBs.the Critical Mission Solutions LOB. The methods for recognizing revenue, incentive fees, project losses and change orders are consistent among the LOBs. 

Aerospace & Technology

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Revenue

$

2,360,613

 

 

$

2,657,433

 

 

$

2,924,753

 

Operating Profit

 

202,595

 

 

 

203,808

 

 

 

205,368

 


Aerospace & Technology


Page 67



    Critical Mission Solutions
For the Years Ended
October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Revenue$4,965,952 $4,551,162 $3,725,365 
Operating Profit$372,070 $310,043 $255,718 
Fiscal 2020 vs. 2019
Critical Mission Solutions (CMS) segment revenues for the year ended October 2, 2020 were $4.97 billion, up $414.8 million, or 9.1%, from $4.55 billion for the prior year. Our increase in revenue was primarily attributable to incremental revenue from the KeyW and John Wood Group nuclear business acquisitions, along with the extra week of activity in fiscal 2020. These favorable impacts more than offset unfavorable COVID-19 related revenue impacts mainly due to challenges from physical distancing requirements, client scheduling changes and other related factors. Impacts on revenues from unfavorable foreign currency translation were approximately $4.5 million for the year ended October 2, 2020.
Operating profit for the segment was $372.1 million for the year ended October 2, 2020, up $62.0 million, or 20.0%, from $310.0 million for the prior year. The increases from the prior year were primarily attributable to incremental operating profit from the KeyW and John Wood Group nuclear business acquisitions, the extra week of activity in fiscal 2020 and the favorable close out of a large program management contract in the first fiscal quarter of 2020. Impacts on operating profit from unfavorable foreign currency translation were approximately $0.4 million for the year ended October 2, 2020. Unfavorable revenue impacts from COVID-19 mentioned above were largely offset by the Company’s mitigating actions in discretionary operating spend and benefits costs, government assistance programs and other areas of improved operating performance.
Fiscal 2019 vs. 2018
CMS segment revenues for the year ended September 29, 201727, 2019 were $2.36$4.55 billion, down $296.8up $825.8 million, or 11.2%22.2%, from $2.66$3.73 billion for the corresponding period last year.in 2018. The decreaseincrease in revenues was mainlydue in our U.S. government businesslarge part to nuclear services sector where rebid losses and small business award preferences droverevenue resulting from the declines. Unfavorable foreign currency impacts of approximately $13 million also contributed to this year over year decline. These unfavorable items were partially offset by positive gains from organic growth and improvement in our telecommunications sector, our NASA projects and our projectsCH2M acquisition included for the Ministryfull year of Defence in Australia.

Aerospace & Technologyfiscal 2019 and also incremental revenues forfrom the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016KeyW acquisition. Also, our CMS revenues were $2.66 billion, down $267.3 million, or 9.1%, from $2.92 billion in fiscal 2015.  The decrease was due mainly topositively impacted by year-over-year revenue volume growth across the impact of certain of our U.S. government customers’ shift to a small-business preference in contract awards of approximately $281 million, offset slightlylegacy portfolio, highlighted by stronger revenues in our U.K. nuclear and defense markets of approximately $14 million.

Operating profit for the Aerospace & Technology segment was $202.6 million for the year ended September 29, 2017, down $1.2 million, or 0.6%, from $203.8 million for the year ended September 30, 2016. This decrease in profitability was due primarily to the revenue declinesincreased spending by customers in the U.S. government business sector mentioned above, as well as lower equity income from our U.K. joint venture for the comparative periods mainly associated with year over year declines in project funding.

Aerospace and Technology operating profit for the year ended September 30, 2016 was $203.8 million, down $1.6 million, or 0.8%, from $205.4 million in fiscal 2015.  The slight decrease in operating profit was due mainly to the U.S.

Page 48


government customer shifts in fiscal 2016 described above but was mostly mitigated by improving our performance on fixed price contracts, which increased operating profit by $14.5 million over the comparable prior year period.

Buildings & Infrastructure

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2,

2015

 

Revenue

$

2,452,321

 

 

$

2,253,512

 

 

$

2,458,379

 

Operating Profit

 

193,455

 

 

 

174,648

 

 

 

145,299

 

Buildings & Infrastructure revenues for the year ended September 29, 2017 were $2.45 billion, an increase of $198.8 million, or 8.8%, versus $2.25 billion for the comparable period in 2016. The year over year increases in revenues was due mainly to U.S. client spending level increases in the project-management/construction-management (“PMCM”) market. Year over year impactsbusiness. Impacts on revenues from unfavorable foreign currency were approximately $36 million.

Buildings & Infrastructure revenues$29.7 million for fiscal year 2019.

Operating profit for the CMS segment was $310.0 million for the year ended September 30, 2016 was $2.3 billion, a decrease of $204.927, 2019, up $54.3 million, or 8.3%21.2%, from $2.5$255.7 million for the corresponding period in 2018. In addition to incremental operating profit benefits from the CH2M and KeyW acquisitions, the increase from the prior year was primarily attributable to continued growth in profits from our U.S. governmental business. SG&A for the CMS segment increased for fiscal 2019 attributable mainly to incremental SG&A associated with the CH2M and KeyW acquisitions. Fiscal 2018 included charges of $15.0 million associated with a legal matter.
    People & Places Solutions
For the Years Ended
October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Revenue$8,601,023 $8,186,706 $6,854,408 
Operating Profit$740,707 $714,394 $527,900 
Page 68


Fiscal 2020 vs. 2019
Revenues for the People & Places Solutions (P&PS) segment for the year ended October 2, 2020 were $8.60 billion, up $414.3 million, or 5.1%, from $8.19 billion for the prior year. The increases in revenue were due in part to portfolio growth across our businesses, highlighted by strong investment in advanced facilities, water and transport infrastructure and project management/construction management ("PMCM") sectors, along with the extra week of activity in fiscal 2015.  The decrease was primarily2020. These favorable performance trends more than offset unfavorable COVID-19 related revenue impacts mainly due to reduced U.S.challenges from physical distancing requirements, client scheduling changes and U.K. client spending in certain markets duringother related factors. Impacts on revenues from unfavorable foreign currency translation were approximately $26.2 million for fiscal 2016.

2020.

Operating profit for Buildings & Infrastructurethe segment for the year ended October 2, 2020 was $740.7 million, an increase of $26.3 million, or 3.7%, from $714.4 million for the comparative period in 2019. The year-over-year increase in operating profit was due primarily to positive impacts from the higher year-over-year revenues for the segment, along with the extra week of activity in fiscal 2020 and reductions in costs related to COVID-19 impacts and mitigation efforts. Impacts on operating profit from unfavorable foreign currency translation were approximately $6.1 million for fiscal 2020. Unfavorable revenue impacts from COVID-19 mentioned above were largely offset by the Company’s mitigating actions in discretionary operating spend and benefits costs, government assistance programs and other areas of improved operating performance.
Fiscal 2019 vs. 2018
Revenues for the P&PS segment for the year ended September 29, 201727, 2019 were $8.19 billion, an increase of $1.34 billion, or 19.6%, from $6.85 billion for the corresponding period in 2018. The increase in revenues was $193.5 million, up $18.8 million, or 10.8%, compareddue in part to $174.6favorable impacts resulting from the CH2M acquisition included for the full year of fiscal 2019 together with revenue increases across all our businesses given the strong investment by customers in Life Sciences, Electronics, Water and Transport Infrastructure sectors. Impacts on revenues from unfavorable foreign currency were approximately $57.8 million for 2016. Excluded from the presented operatingfiscal 2019.
Operating profit amounts for the year ending September 29, 2017 were $23.8 million in Restructuring and other charges related to strategic business restructuring activities in our U.K, Middle East and Europe businesses. Increases in profitability for the period in 2017 over 2016 were due mainly to higher revenue from the U.S. PMCM projects, partially offset by charges from a contract settlement of $6.0 million.

Operating profitsegment for the year ended September 30, 2016 were $174.627, 2019 was $714.4 million, an increase of $29.3up $186.5 million, or 20.2%, from $145.3 million for 2015.    Proactive cost control and restructuring efforts contributed to the increase in operating profit for fiscal 2016 as compared to the corresponding period last year.  As a result, operating margin for fiscal 2016 improved to 7.8%35.3%, compared to 5.9%, in fiscal 2015.

Industrial

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2,

2015

 

Revenue

$

2,743,662

 

 

$

2,793,713

 

 

$

2,517,571

 

Operating Profit

 

115,262

 

 

 

81,268

 

 

 

126,531

 

Industrial revenues for the year ended September 29, 2017 were $2.74 billion versus $2.79 billion for the same period in 2016, down $50.1 million, or 1.8%. The decrease in revenues was due mainly to  revenue declines from Field Services project completions, weaker market conditions in the Mining & Minerals businesses and unfavorable foreign currency impacts, partially offset by improvements in higher revenues associated with increased client major capex spending in the Life Sciences business.

Industrial revenues for the year ended September 30, 2016 were $2.79 million, an increase of $276.1 million, or 11.0%, from $2.5 billion in fiscal 2015.  The increase was primarily due to new Life Sciences projects offset by a decline in the Mining & Minerals business due to weak market conditions.

Operating profit for the year ended September 29, 2017, was $115.3 million, up $34.0 million, or 41.8%, from $81.3$527.9 million for the corresponding period last year.in 2018. The increase in profitability was due mainly to improved project performance in the Mining & Minerals business and higher levels of professional service and project procurement business in the Life Sciences business. Year over year profit comparisons were also impacted by unfavorable charges in the second quarter fiscal 2016 associated with litigation settlements and a customer bankruptcy amounting to $12.2 million.

Operating profit for the year ended September 30, 2016 was $81.3 million, a decrease of $45.3 million, or 35.8%, from $126.5 million, in fiscal 2015.   The decrease was due to the decline in the Mining & Minerals business and was caused primarily by a negotiated settlement of a project claim that occurred in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 combined with the

Page 49


negative effects of a litigation settlement affecting the second quarter of fiscal 2016 and a customer bankruptcy. These decreases were offset in part by the increases in the Life Sciences market and benefits associated with the 2015 Restructuring. Although driven by discrete items in each of the periods presented, the change in operating profit was negative.  As a result, operating margin for fiscal 2016 declinedin part due to 2.9%favorable impacts from 5.0% for the corresponding period last year.

Petroleum & Chemicals

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2,

2015

 

Revenue

$

2,466,192

 

 

$

3,259,499

 

 

$

4,214,129

 

Operating Profit

 

113,858

 

 

 

126,604

 

 

 

138,351

 

Petroleum & ChemicalsCH2M acquisition, together with positive impacts from the higher year over year revenues for the year ended September 29, 2017 were $2.45 billion,segment. Included in fiscal 2019 results was a decrease of $793.3$25.0 million or 24.3%, from $3.26 billioncharge associated with a project. SG&A for the same period in 2016. The decrease in revenuesP&PS segment increased for the year ended September 29, 2017 as comparedfiscal 2019, with this increase being attributable mainly to the prior year was due primarily to the completion or wind-down of several projects with significant pass-through revenue as well as award delays of large post front-end engineering and design projects, as clients continue to evaluate their capital spending plans as oil prices remained low. Both of these factors resulted in lower field service revenues comparedincremental SG&A

associated with the prior year periods, while client investment spending continues primarily on compliance, maintenance and sustaining capital programs. Additionally, foreign currency impacts were unfavorableCH2M acquisition in December of approximately $18 million on year over year revenue comparisons for fiscal 2017 versus fiscal 2016.

Petroleum & Chemicals revenues for the year ended September 30, 2016 were $3.26 billion, a decrease of $954.6 million, or 22.7%, from $4.2 billion in fiscal 2015.  The decrease was primarily due to lower business volume in the Oil & Gas market sector and to a lesser extent the Refining market sector, particularly in the Middle East and North America, as weak oil prices have significantly impacted client capital spending and delayed the pace of new contract awards.

Operating profit for the year ended September 29, 2017 was $113.9 million, a decrease of $12.7 million, or 10.1%, from $126.6 million for the corresponding period last year. The decrease in profitability as compared to the prior year period was due mainly to revenue declines from lower business volumes mentioned above, offset in part by SG&A savings from restructuring efforts and a one-time $9.9 million benefit associated with benefit plan changes in our India operations.

Operating profit for the year ended September 30, 2016 was $126.6 million, down $11.7 million, or 8.5%, from $138.4 million in fiscal 2015. The decrease in operating profit primarily was due to lower volume in the Oil and Gas and Refining market sectors offset in part by significant savings from restructuring efforts and LOB structure efficiencies. A continued strong focus on cost reductions has partially mitigated the volume reduction impact on operating profit.   As a result, operating margin for the year ended September 30, 2016 increased to 3.9% from 3.3% in fiscal 2015.

2018.

Other Corporate Expenses

Other corporate expenses were $81.6$249.4 million, $60.1$264.4 million and $15.8$161.8 million for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015.2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018, respectively. The decrease from fiscal 2019 to fiscal 2020 was due primarily to cost-reduction programs implemented through prior restructuring initiatives and the current year COVID-19 pandemic response. The increase from fiscal 2018 to fiscal 2019 was due primarily to higher intangible amortization expense from the KeyW and John Wood Group nuclear business acquisitions, as well as impacts from company benefit program enhancements. These increases were partly offset by employee related and other cost reductions across the respective yearsCompany's corporate functions. Fiscal 2019 also included approximately $70.2 million of year-to-date other current year cost allocation realignments that occurred in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 in conjunction with the CH2M acquisition. Prior periods were due mainly to higher spending in personnel related costs and outside services, offset by savings fromnot restated for the 2015 Restructuring program.

cost allocation realignments.

Included in other corporate expenses in the above table are costs and expenses whichthat relate to general corporate activities as well as corporate-managed benefit and insurance programs. Such costs and expenses include: (i) those elements of SG&A expenses relating to the business as a whole; (ii) those elements of our incentive compensation plans relating to corporate personnel whose other compensation costs are not allocated to the LOBs; (iii) the amortization of intangible assets acquired as part of purchased business combinations; (iv) the quarterly variances between the Company’s actual costs of certain of its self-insured integrated risk and employee benefit programs and amounts charged to the LOBs; and (v) certain adjustments relating to costs associated with the Company’s international defined benefit pension plans. In addition, other corporate expenses may also include from time to time certain adjustments to contract margins (both positive and negative) associated with projects, as well as other items, where it has been determined in the opinion of management, that such adjustments are not indicative of the performance of the related LOB.

Page 50

69


The Company currently holds a 24.5% interest in AWE Management Ltd (AWE ML) that is accounted for under the equity method, and the carrying value of the Company’s investment as of October 2, 2020 was approximately $38 million. As of October 2, 2020, AWE ML was under a contractual operating arrangement with the UK Ministry of Defence (MoD) with multiple years remaining under the arrangement. Subsequent to year end, on November 2, 2020, the MoD unexpectedly announced plans to change its current operating agreements with AWE ML that would result in the early termination of the current contract in 2021. The Company is currently evaluating this subsequent development, including the potential impact on our accounting for this equity method investment in future quarters.
Restructuring and Other Charges
For discussion regarding restructuring and other charges, see Note 16- Restructuring and Other Charges to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Page 70


Backlog Information

We include in backlog the total dollar amount of revenues we expect to record in the future as a result of performing work under contracts that have been awarded to us. Our policy with respect to Operations & Maintenance ("O&M&M") contracts, however, is to include in backlog the amount of revenues we expect to receive for one succeeding year, regardless of the remaining life of the contract. For national government programs (other than national government O&M contracts, which are subject to the same policy applicable to all other O&M contracts), our policy is to include in backlog the full contract award, whether funded or unfunded, excluding option periods. Because of variations in the nature, size, expected duration, funding commitments and the scope of services required by our contracts, the timing of when backlog will be recognized as revenues can vary greatly between individual contracts.

Consistent with industry practice, substantially all of our contracts are subject to cancellation or termination at the option of the client.client, including our U.S. government work. While management uses all information available to it to determine backlog, at any given time our backlog is subject to changes in the scope of services to be provided as well as increases or decreases in costs relating to the contracts included therein. Backlog is not necessarily an indicator of future revenues.

Because certain contracts (e.g., contracts relating to large EPCEngineering, Procurement & Construction ("EPC") projects as well as national government programs) can cause large increases to backlog in the fiscal period in which we recognize the award, and because many of our contracts require us to provide services that span over a number ofseveral fiscal quarters (and sometimes over fiscal years), we evaluate our backlog generally on a year-over-year basis, rather thanbut also on a sequential, quarter-over-quarter basis.

basis, where appropriate.

Please refer to Item 1A— 1A- Risk Factors, above, for a discussion of other factors that may cause backlog to ultimately convert into revenues at different amounts.

The following table summarizes our backlog for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 20152020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018 (in millions):

Backlog:

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Aerospace & Technology

 

$

6,231,426

 

 

$

5,109,973

 

 

$

4,880,775

 

Buildings & Infrastructure

 

 

5,412,377

 

 

 

5,033,539

 

 

 

4,723,034

 

Industrial

 

 

2,836,854

 

 

 

3,106,575

 

 

 

3,650,520

 

Petroleum & Chemicals

 

 

5,307,956

 

 

 

5,510,442

 

 

 

5,552,241

 

Total

 

$

19,788,613

 

 

$

18,760,529

 

 

$

18,806,570

 

October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Critical Mission Solutions$9,104 $8,460 $7,130 
People & Places Solutions14,714 14,109 12,825 
            Total$23,818 $22,569 $19,955 

Increases

The increase in backlog in Aerospace & TechnologyCritical Mission Solutions for the years presented werewas primarily the result of new awards from the U.S. federal government.

Increasesgovernment and the acquisition of John Wood Group's nuclear consulting, remediation and program management business in fiscal 2020.

The increase in backlog in BuildingPeople & InfrastructurePlaces Solutions for the years presented werewas primarily the result of new awards in the U.K. and U.S. market.

Decreases in backlog in the Industrial line of business resulted mainly from a large cancellation in the Life Sciences area and strong revenue realization associated with large pharma projects for fiscal 2017 versus fiscal 2016.  The decrease from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2016 was primarily related to a lower level of field services awards.

The decrease in backlog in Petroleum & Chemicals from fiscal 2016 to fiscal 2017 was due mainly to continuing weakness in the upstream market, partly offset by strong performance in chemicals backlog.  The decrease from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2016 was primarily related to weak oil prices affecting our customers’ capital spend.

markets.

Backlog relating to work to be performed either directly or indirectly for the U.S. federal government and its agencies totaled approximately $4.6$8.5 billion (or 23.2%35.7% of total backlog), $4.8$8.8 billion (or 25.4%39.1% of total backlog) and $4.6$6.8 billion (or 23.9%34.1% of total backlog) at September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015,2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018, respectively. Most of our federal government contracts require that services be provided beyond one year. In general, these contracts must be funded annually (i.e., the amounts to be spent under the contract must be appropriated by the U.S. Congress to the procuring agency, and then the agency must allot these sums to the specific contracts).

We estimate that approximately $7$7.48 billion, or 35%31.4%, of total backlog at September 29, 2017October 2, 2020 will be realized as revenues within the next fiscal year.

Consolidated backlog differs from the Company’s remaining performance obligations as defined by ASC 606 primarily because of our national government contracts (other than national government O&M contracts). Our policy is to include in backlog the full contract award, whether funded or unfunded excluding the option periods while our remaining performance obligations represent a measure of the total dollar value of work to be performed on contracts awarded and in progress. Additionally, the Company includes our proportionate share of backlog related to unconsolidated joint ventures which is not included in our remaining performance obligations.
Page 51

71


Liquidity and Capital Resources

At September 29, 2017,October 2, 2020, our principal sources of liquidity consisted of $774.2$862.4 million ofin cash and cash equivalents $1.3and $2.09 billion of available borrowing capacity under our $1.6$2.25 billion 2014 revolving credit facilityagreement (the “Revolving"Revolving Credit Facility”Facility") and $1.5 billion of available borrowings under our Term Loan Facility (defined below). Additional information regarding the Revolving Credit Facility and the Term Loan Facility is set forth in Note 6 - Borrowings in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We finance much of our operations and growth through cash generated by our operations.

On September 28, 2017, the Company entered into a $1.5 billion unsecured delayed-draw term loan facility (the “Term Loan Facility”) with a syndicate of financial institutions as lenders and letter of credit issuers.  Subject to certain terms and conditions set forth therein, loans under the Term Loan Facility may be incurred on the day the CH2M acquisition is consummated in order to pay cash consideration for the transaction, and to pay fees and expenses related to the acquisition and the Term Loan Facility.  

The Company intends to finance the cash consideration for the CH2M acquisition, the repayment of CH2M’s outstanding indebtedness and other transaction expenses with a combination of cash on hand and debt financing, which includes Term Loan Facility in an aggregate principal amount of $1.5 billion and additional borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility.  The Company currently estimates that the aggregate principal amount of indebtedness to be incurred in connection with the acquisition will be approximately $1.9 billion.  

At September 29, 2017, our cash and cash equivalents were $774.2 million, at October 2, 2020 represented an increase of $118.4$231.4 million from $655.7$631.1 million at September 30, 2016. This compares to a net increase27, 2019, the reasons for which are described below.

Our cash flow provided by operations of $194.9 $806.8 million during fiscal 2020 was comparatively higher than the $366.4 million in cash flow used for operations for the prior year ended September 30, 2016.

The most significant factors contributing. This improvement was due primarily to favorable net cash earnings driven in part by improved operating profit performance and mitigating actions from the Company in response to the net increaseCOVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, this favorable trend in cash and cash equivalents for fiscal 2017 from fiscal 2016 were favorable cash from operations of $574.9 million, partly offset by cash outflowsbenefited from investing activities of $236.2 million, $242.6 million in cash used in financing activities and unfavorable effects of exchange rate changes of $22.3 million.  On a comparative basis, cash and cash equivalents increased $194.9 million from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2016 mainly from cash generated from operating activities of $680.2 million, partly offset by cash used in investing activities of $139.6 million, cash used in financing activities of $317.0 million and unfavorable effects of exchange rate changes of $28.7 million.

Our cash from operations for the year ended September 29, 2017 was $574.9 million, down $105.3 million from the corresponding period of 2016.  This net decrease was mainly associated with increases in netlower working capital of $206.1 million (mainly higher accounts receivable and offset in part by higher accounts payable), partly offset by higher net earnings of $72.9 million, favorable cash flows from other deferred liabilities of $34.8 million and other operating cash items.  Our cash from operations for the year ended September 30, 2016 was $680.2 million, up $195.6 million from the corresponding period of 2015.  This net increase was mainly associated with decreases in working capital of $373.1 million (mainly lower accounts receivable and increases in billings in excess of costs), offset in part by lower net earnings of $114.4 million and other operating cash items.

With respect to the Company’s working capital accounts, the Company’s cash flows from operations are greatly affected by the cost-plus nature of our customer contracts. Because such a high percentage of our revenues are earned on cost-plus type contracts, and due to the significance of revenues relating to pass-through costs, most of the costs we incur are included in invoices we send to clients. Although we continually monitor our accounts receivable, we manage the operating cash flows of the Company by managing the working capital accounts in total, rather than by the individual elements. The primary elements of the Company’s working capital accounts are accounts receivable, accounts payable, and billings in excess of cost. Accounts payable consist of obligations to third parties relating primarily to costs incurred for projects which are generally billable to clients. Accounts receivable consist of amounts due from our clients of which a substantial portion are for project-related costs. Billings in excess of cost consist of billings to and payments from our clients for costs yet to be incurred.

This relationship between revenues and costs, and between receivables and payables, is unique to our industry, and facilitates review of our liquidity at the total working capital level.

With respect to the Company’s trade accounts receivable, while our credit risk could be significant based on the fact that we provide services to clients operating in a wide range of industries as well as in a number of countries outside the U.S., we manage these issues closely to reduce exposures as much as possible and historically have not experienced material losses. Our private sector customers include large, well-known, and well-established multi-national companies, and our

Page 52


government customers consist of national, state, and local agencies located principally in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia. Although we have not historically experienced significant collection issues with our governmental or commercial customers, we continue to monitor our credit policies with our customers in the markets we serve.

Our cash used in investing activities for the year ended September 29, 2017 was $236.2 million, up $96.6 million from the corresponding period of 2016.  This net increase in cash used waslevels, due mainly to higher levels of acquisition spend of $100.2 million and higher capex of $50.4 million, partly offset by proceedscash used in the prior year for income taxes payable largely attributable to taxes paid on the gain from the ECR sale and favorable cash flow impacts in accrued liabilities, including the deferral of our Neste Jacobs joint venture. certain payments associated mainly with COVID-19 government assistance programs in the U.S. and Europe, offset mainly by higher cash used in accounts payable.

Our cash used for investing activities for fiscal 2020 of $429.1 million was comparatively lower than the $2.2 billion cash provided by investing activities for the prior year. The change was due primarily to the impact in 2019 of $2.80 billion in cash proceeds associated with the ECR sale and cash paid for the KeyW acquisition of $575.1 million, net of cash acquired. On a comparative basis, cash used in investing activities included approximately $293.6 million in cash paid for the year ended September 30, 2016John Wood Group's nuclear business, net of cash acquired in the second quarter of fiscal 2020.
Our cash used for financing activities of $208.3 million in fiscal 2020 resulted mainly from share repurchases of $337.3 million and dividend payments to both shareholders and non-controlling interests totaling $144.0 million, offset by net proceeds from borrowings of $265.3 million. Cash used for financing activities was $139.6 million, up $43.5 million$2.0 billion in fiscal 2019 resulted mainly from net repayments of borrowings of $1.0 billion primarily related to repayments with cash received from the corresponding period of 2015. This net increase in cash used was due mainly to higher levels of spend on acquisitions and divestitures of $60.9 million, offset in part by lower capex of $20.7 million.  

Our cash used in financing activities for the year ended September 29, 2017 was $242.6 million, down $74.4 million from the corresponding period of 2016.  This net decrease increase in cash used was mainly attributable to lower net cash activity of long-term borrowings of $38.4 million and lower cash spend inECR sale, common stock repurchases of $55.4$853.7 million offset in part mainly by dividendsand dividend payments to both shareholders and non-controlling interests of $54.2 million paid in 2017.   Our cash used in financing activities for$106.4 million.

At October 2, 2020, the year ended September 30, 2016 was $317.0 million, down $236.3 million from the corresponding period of 2015.  This net decrease increase in cash used was mainly attributable to lower cash spent on common stock repurchases of $269.8 million, offset in part mainly by higher net cash used in long-term borrowings activity of $52.7 million.  

The Company had $774.2approximately $153.0 million ofin cash and cash equivalents at September 29, 2017. Of this amount, approximately $124.1 million was held in the U.S. and $650.1$709.4 million was held outside of the U.S. (primarily in the U.K., the Eurozone, Chile,Australia, India and India) and wasthe United Arab Emirates), which is used primarily for funding operations in those regions. Other than the tax cost of repatriating funds to the U.S. (see Note 10— 7-Income Taxesof Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K), there are no material impediments to repatriating these funds to the U.S.

In March 2020, the Company entered into a new unsecured term loan facility (the “2020 Term Loan Facility”) with a syndicate of financial institutions as lenders. The principal balance of the 2020 Term Loan Facility was $1.0 billion as of October 2, 2020. The terms and other important details are summarized in Note 9- Borrowings. The 2020 Term Loan Facility was entered into as part of our strategy to increase the portion of our long-term debt that is represented by term loan facilities. During fiscal 2020, the Company used proceeds of the 2020 Term Loan Facility to repay $200.0 million in short-term debt and all but $152.8 million in outstanding amounts under the Revolving Credit Facility.
The Company had $262.1$263.0 million in letters of credit outstanding at September 29, 2017.October 2, 2020. Of this amount, $2.5 $2.3 million was issued under the Revolving Credit Facility and $259.6 $260.7 million waswas issued under separate, committed and uncommitted letter-of-credit facilities.

On March 6, 2020, a subsidiary of Jacobs completed the acquisition of John Wood Group's nuclear consulting, remediation and program management business for an enterprise value of £246 million, or approximately $317.9 million, less cash acquired of $24.3 million. The Company has recorded its preliminary purchase accounting processes associated with the acquisitions, which are summarized in Note 14- Business Combinations.
On June 12, 2019, Jacobs completed the acquisition of KeyW by acquiring 100% of the outstanding shares of KeyW common stock. The Company paid total consideration of $902.6 million which was comprised of approximately $604.2 million in cash to the former stockholders and certain equity award holders of KeyW and the assumption of KeyW’s debt of $298.4 million. The Company repaid KeyW's outstanding debt by the end of the fourth fiscal quarter of 2019. The Company has recorded its final purchase accounting associated with the acquisition, which is summarized in Note 14- Business Combinations.
Page 72


On April 26, 2019, Jacobs completed the sale of its ECR business to Worley for a purchase price of $3.4 billion consisting of (i) $2.8 billion in cash plus (ii) 58.2 million ordinary shares of Worley, subject to adjustments for changes in working capital and certain other items.     
We believe we have adequate liquidity and capital resources to fund our operations, support our acquisition strategy, service our debt, and pay dividends for the next twelve months. We believe that the capacity, terms and conditions of the Revolving Credit Facility and the Term Loan Facility, combined withprojected cash on-hand and the other committed and uncommitted facilities we have in place, are adequate for our working capital and general business requirements for the next twelve months.

months based on the liquidity provided by our cash and cash equivalents on hand, our borrowing capacity and our continuing cash from operations. We further believe that our financial resources and discretionary spend controls, as well as near term benefits from government assistance programs, will allow us to continue managing the negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business operations for the foreseeable future, which is expected to include reduced revenue from operating activities, based on current assumptions and expectations regarding the pandemic. We have taken actions to reduce spending more broadly across the Company, only proceeding with operating and capital spending that is critical. We have also ceased all non-essential hiring and reduced discretionary expenses, including certain employee benefits and compensation. In addition, as a precautionary measure, we temporarily suspended purchases under the share repurchase plan in March 2020 with such suspension remaining in effect through the third fiscal quarter of 2020. Looking ahead, we have developed contingency plans to reduce costs further if the situation deteriorates beyond or lasts longer than current assumptions and expectations.

We were in compliance with all of our debt covenants at October 2, 2020.
Page 53

73


Contractual Obligations

The following table sets forth certain information about our contractual obligations as of September 29, 2017October 2, 2020 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payments Due by Fiscal Period

 

 

 

Total

 

 

1 Year

or Less

 

 

1 - 3

Years

 

 

3 - 5

Years

 

 

More than 5

Years

 

Debt obligations

$

238,071

 

$

3,071

 

$

235,000

 

 

 

$

 

Operating leases (a)

 

768,104

 

 

139,967

 

 

251,816

 

 

202,052

 

 

174,269

 

Obligations under defined benefit pension plans (b)

 

254,483

 

 

23,874

 

 

47,607

 

 

52,510

 

 

130,492

 

Obligations under nonqualified deferred compensation

   plans (c)

 

135,996

 

 

27,159

 

 

57,620

 

 

51,217

 

 

 

Purchase obligations (d)

 

1,333,934

 

 

1,333,934

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest (e)

 

13,568

 

 

4,065

 

 

7,865

 

 

1,638

 

 

 

Total

$

2,744,156

 

$

1,532,070

 

$

599,908

 

$

307,417

 

$

304,761

 

(a)

Assumes the Company will make the end of lease term residual value guarantee payment of $62.4 million in 2025 with respect to the lease of an office building in Houston, Texas. Please refer to Note 11— Commitments and Contingencies, and Derivative Financial Instruments of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(b)

Assumes that future contributions will be consistent with amounts projected to be contributed in fiscal 2017, allowing for certain growth based on rates of inflation and salary increases, but limited to the amount recorded as of September 29, 2017. Actual contributions will depend on a variety of factors, including amounts required by local laws and regulations, and other funding requirements.

 Payments Due by Fiscal Period
 Total1 Year or Less1 - 3 Years3 - 5 YearsMore than 5 Years
Debt obligations$1,678,620 $—  $— $1,368,620 $310,000 
Interest (1)188,238 36,844 73,689 53,854 23,851 
Operating leases994,678 184,967 307,834 235,338 266,539 
Unfunded portion of defined benefit pension plans (2)400,391 31,258 66,317 71,728 231,088 
Obligations under nonqualified deferred compensation plans (3)171,130 12,614 26,762 28,946 102,808 
Purchase obligations (4)2,842,462 2,297,161 545,301 — — 
Total$6,275,519 $2,562,844 $1,019,903 $1,758,486 $934,286 

(c)

Assumes that future payments will be consistent with amounts paid in fiscal 2017. Due to the nonqualified nature of the plans, and the fact that benefits are based in part on years of service, the payments included in the schedule were limited to the amount recorded as of September 29, 2017.

(d)

Represents those liabilities estimated to be under firm contractual commitments as of September 29, 2017; primarily accounts payable, accrued payroll and accrued dividends.

(e)

Determined based on borrowings outstanding at the end of fiscal 2017 using the interest rates in effect at that time and, for our outstanding long term(1)Determined based on borrowings outstanding at the end of fiscal 2020 using the interest rates in effect at that time, considering the effects of interest rate swap agreements, and for our outstanding long-term debt, concluding with the expiration date of the Revolving Credit Facility, as defined below.

Merger Agreement

On August 1, 2017, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with CH2M HILL Companies, Ltd. (“CH2M”), and Basketball Merger Sub Inc., a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”). Pursuant todebt facilities as defined below.

(2)Assumes that future contributions will be consistent with amounts contributed in fiscal 2020, allowing for certain growth based on rates of inflation and subjectsalary increases, but limited to the termsamount recorded as of October 2, 2020. Actual contributions will depend on a variety of factors, including amounts required by local laws and conditionsregulations, and other funding requirements.
(3)Assumes that future payments will be consistent with amounts paid in fiscal 2020. Due to the non-qualified nature of the Merger Agreement, (i) Merger Sub will merge withplans, and into CH2M, with CH2M continuing as the surviving corporation and becoming a wholly-owned subsidiaryfact that benefits are based in part on years of service, the Company (the “Merger”) and (ii) each outstanding share of common stock of CH2M will be converted intopayments included in the right to receive, at the election of the holder thereof in accordance with, and subjectschedule were limited to the terms, conditionsamount recorded as of October 2, 2020.
(4)Represents those liabilities estimated to be under firm contractual commitments as of October 2, 2020; primarily accounts payable, accrued payroll and procedures set forth in the Merger Agreement, in each case without interest the following consideration: (a) the combination of (x) $52.85 in cash and (y) 0.6677 shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per share, of the Company; (b) $88.08 in cash; or (c) 1.6693 shares of the Company’s common stock.

The Merger is subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions, including without limitation, approval by CH2M stockholders.  For risks related to the Merger, see Item 1A-Risk Factors above.

accrued dividends.

Effects of Inflation and Changing Prices

The effects of inflation and changing prices on our business is discussed in Item 1A— 1A- Risk Factors, and is incorporated herein by reference.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We are party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the form of guarantees not reflected in our balance sheet that arise in the normal course of business. However, such off-balance sheet arrangements are not reasonably likely to

Page 54


have ana material adverse effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or resources that are material to investors.resources. See Note 11 – 17- Commitments and Contingencies and Derivative Financial Instruments of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Page 74


New Accounting Pronouncements

Revenue Recognition

From time to time,

ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issues accounting standards updates (each an “ASU”) to its Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), which constitutes the primary source of U.S. GAAP. The Company regularly monitors ASUs as they are issued and considers their applicability to its business. All ASUs applicable to the Company are adopted by the due date and in the manner prescribed by the FASB.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09— Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The new guidance provided by ASU 2014-09Test for Goodwill Impairment, is intended to remove inconsistencies and perceived weaknesses in the existing revenue requirements, provide a more robust framework for addressing revenue issues, improve comparability, provide more useful information and simplify the preparation of financial statements.  ASU 2014-09 was initially effective for annual and interim reporting periodsfiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. In July, 2015,2019 with early adoption permitted. ASU 2017-04 removes the FASB approved a one-year deferralsecond step of the effective date of this standard. The revised effective dategoodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. An entity will now recognize a goodwill impairment charge for the standard is for annualamount by which a reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods therein.  The FASB also approved changes allowing for earlyunit's carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. Management does not expect the adoption of the standard as of the original effective date.

The Company’s adoption activities will be performed over three phases: (i) assessment, (ii) design, and (iii) implementation.  Our assessment phase is substantially complete. The following are the potential significant differences identified during the assessment phase:

Performance Obligations

Under current U.S. GAAP the Company typically considers engineering and construction services as separate performance obligations.  Under ASU 2014-09, the Company has determined, in most instances, it is likely that engineering and construction services will be required2017-04 to be combined into a single performance obligation.  In these instances, this will likely change the timing and pattern of revenue recognition.

Contract Modifications

In many instances, the Company enters into contracts for construction services subsequent to entering in to engineering services contracts.  Under ASU 2014-09, the construction services contract may be deemed to modify the engineering contract, or may be required to be combined with the engineering contract.  This modification or combination of contracts may result in a cumulative catchup adjustment, which will have an immediateany impact on the Company’sCompany's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments requires entities to use a current lifetime expected credit loss methodology to measure impairments of certain financial assets. Using this methodology will result in earlier recognition of losses than under the periodcurrent incurred loss approach, which requires waiting to recognize a loss until it is probable of having been incurred. There are other provisions within the contract combination or modification occurs. In addition, it will change the timingstandard that affect how impairments of other financial assets may be recorded and pattern of revenue recognition after the period the contracts have been combined or modified.

The Company currently intends to adopt the new standard using the Modified Retrospective application.presented, and that expand disclosures. This standard couldwill be effective for our interim and annual periods beginning with the first quarter of fiscal 2021, and must be applied on a modified retrospective basis. Management does not expect the adoption of ASU 326 to have a significantmaterial impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and an administrative impact on itsCompany's financial position, results of operations and will depend on the magnitude of the items discussed above. The Company will continue to evaluate the impact through the design and implementation phases.

Lease Accounting

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02—Leases. ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities for most leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for public entity financial statements for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The guidance must be adopted using a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements. The Company is evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements. This standard could have a significant administrative impact on its operations, and the Company will further assess the impact through its implementation program.

Page 55


Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09—Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted for any entity in any interim or annual period for which financial statements have not been issued or made available for issuance. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments must be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. The Company is evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements and does not plan to early adopt this pronouncement.

Page 56

75

Item 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK


Item 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We do not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading, speculation or other purposes that would expose the Company to market risk. In the normal course of business, our results of operations are exposed to risks associated with fluctuations in interest rates and currency exchange rates.

Interest Rate Risk

Please refer tosee the discussion of the Revolving Credit Facility and the Term Loan Facility in the liquidity and capital resources discussion in Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and Note 6 - 9- Borrowings in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on Page F-1 of this Annual reportReport on Form 10-K.

10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference, for a discussion of the Revolving Credit Facility and Note Purchase Agreement.

Our Revolving Credit Facility, 2020 Term Loan Facility and certain other debt obligations are subject to variable rate interest which could be adversely affected by an increase in interest rates. As of October 2, 2020, we had an aggregate of $1.2 billion in outstanding borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility and 2020 Term Loan Facility. Interest on amounts borrowed under these agreements is subject to adjustment based on the Company’s Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as defined in the credit agreements governing the Revolving Credit Facility and the 2020 Term Loan Facility). Depending on the Company’s Consolidated Leverage Ratio, borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility and the 2020 Term Loan Facility bear interest at a Eurocurrency rate plus a margin of between 0.875% and 1.5% or a base rate plus a margin of between 0% and 0.5%. Additionally, if our consolidated leverage ratio exceeds a certain amount, the interest on the Senior Notes may increase by 75 basis points. However, as discussed in Note 17- Commitments and Contingencies and Derivative Financial Instruments, we have entered into swap agreements with an aggregate notional value of $911.5 million to convert the variable rate interest based liabilities associated with a corresponding amount of our debt into fixed interest rate liabilities, leaving $267.1 million in principal amount subject to variable interest rate risk.
For the year ended October 2, 2020, our weighted average floating rate borrowings were approximately $1.2 billion. If floating interest rates had increased by 1.00%, our interest expense for the year ended October 2, 2020 would have increased by approximately $12.2 million.
Foreign Currency Risk

In situations where our operations incur contract costs in currencies other than their functional currency, we attempt to have a portion of the related contract revenues denominated in the same currencies as the costs. In those situations where revenues and costs are transacted in different currencies, we sometimes enter into foreign exchange contracts in order to limit our exposure to fluctuating foreign currencies. We follow the provisions of ASC 815-10 - No. 815, Derivatives and Hedging in accounting for our derivative contracts. The Company does not currently havehas $521.5 million in notional value of exchange rate sensitive instruments that would have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements or results of operations.

at October 2, 2020. See Note 17-
Commitments and Contingencies and Derivative Financial Instruments for discussion.

Item 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Page 76



Item 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The information required by this Item 8 is submitted as a separate section beginning on page F-1ofF-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Item 9.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.

Item 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Item 9A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures are those controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chair and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
The Company’s management, with the participation of its Chair and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined by Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of September 29, 2017,October 2, 2020, the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were functioning effectively as of the Evaluation Date were effective to provide reasonable assuranceensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filedthat it files or submittedsubmits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chair and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining for the Company adequate internal controlscontrol over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Management, with the participation of its Chair and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of the Evaluation Date based on the framework established in “Internal Control—Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework). Based on this evaluation,assessment, management has concluded that the Company’s internal controlscontrol over financial reporting as of the Evaluation Date werewas effective.
The Company’sCompany's independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, has issued an attestation report onthat audited the Company’s internal control overCompany's consolidated financial reporting which appears laterstatements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, also audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of October 2, 2020, as stated in their report included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Page 57


Changes in Internal Control

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the Company’s fiscal quarter ended September 29, 2017October 2, 2020 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Page 77


Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

The Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures or its system of internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed or operated, can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system of internal control are met. The design of the Company’s control system reflects the fact that there are resource constraints, and that the benefits of such control systems must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control failures and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the intentional acts of individuals, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is also based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that the design of any particular control will always succeed in achieving its objective under all potential future conditions.

Item 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 9B.    OTHER INFORMATION
None.


Page 58

78


PART III

Item 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Item 10.    DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons

The information required by Paragraph (a), and Paragraphs (c) through (g) of Item 401 of Regulation S-K (except for information required by Paragraph (e) of that Item to the extent the required information pertains to our executive officers) and Item 405 of Regulation S-K is set forth under the captions “Members of the Board of Directors,” “Corporate Governance” and “Section“Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”Reports” in our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year and is incorporated herein by reference. The information required by Paragraph (b) of Item 401 of Regulation S-K, as well as the information required by Paragraph (e) of that Item to the extent the required information pertains to our executive officers, is set forth in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading “Executive Officers of the Registrant.“Information About Our Executive Officers.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics for our Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers; a code of business conduct and ethics for members of our Board of Directors and corporate governance guidelines. The full text of these codes of ethics and corporate governance guidelines are available at our website at www.jacobs.com. In the event we make any amendment to, or grant any waiver from, a provision of the code of ethics that applies to the principal executive officer, principal financial officer or principal accounting officer that requires disclosure under applicable SEC rules, we will disclose such amendment or waiver and the reasons therefor on our website. We will provide any person without charge a copy of any of the aforementioned codes of ethics upon receipt of a written request. Requests should be addressed to: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., 1999 Bryan Street, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75201, Attention: Corporate Secretary.

Corporate Governance

The information required by Items 407(d)(4) and (d)(5) of Regulation S-K is set forth under the caption “Corporate Governance” in our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Item 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item is set forth under the captions “Corporate Governance,” “Compensation Committee Report,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,”Analysis” and “Executive Compensation” in our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table presents certain information about our equity compensation plans as of September 29, 2017:

 

 

Column A

 

 

Column B

 

 

Column C

 

Plan Category

 

Number of securities to

be issued upon

exercise of outstanding

options,

warrants, and rights

 

 

Weighted- average

exercise price of

outstanding options,

warrants, and rights

 

 

Number of securities remaining

available for future issuance under

equity compensation

plans (excluding securities reflected

in Column A)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by

   shareholders (a)

 

 

2,516,825

 

 

$

$46.19

 

 

 

7,664,358

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by

   shareholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

2,516,825

 

 

$

$46.19

 

 

 

7,664,358

 

Item 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

(a)

The number in Column A excludes purchase rights accruing under our two, broad-based, shareholder-approved employee stock purchase plans: The Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 1989 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended

Page 59


and restated (the “1989 ESPP”), and the Global Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated (the “GESPP”). These plans give employees the right to purchase shares at an amount and price that are not determinable until the end of the specified purchase periods, which occur monthly. Our shareholders have authorized a total of 32.3 million shares of common stock to be issued through the 1989 ESPP and the GESPP. From the inception of the 1989 ESPP and the GESPP through September 29, 2017, a total of 27.6 million shares have been issued, leaving 4.7 million shares of common stock available for future issuance at that date.

The information required by this Item 403 of Regulation S-K is set forth under the caption “Security Ownership” in our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Item 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this Item is set forth under the captions “Members of The Board of Directors,” “Corporate Governance,” and “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Item 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this Item is set forth under the captions “Report of the Audit Committee” and “Audit and Non-Audit Fees” in our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year and is incorporated herein by reference.

Page 60

79


PART IV

Item 15.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Item 15.    EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) Documents filed as part of this report:

(1)

The Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements at September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016 and for each of the three years in the period ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015 and the notes thereto, together with the report of the independent auditors on those Consolidated Financial Statements are hereby filed as part of this report, beginning on page F-1.

(1)The Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements at October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019 and for each of the three years in the period ended October 2, 2020, and the notes thereto, together with the report of the independent auditors on those Consolidated Financial Statements are hereby filed as part of this report, beginning on page F-1.
(2)Financial statement schedules – no financial statement schedules are presented as the required information is either not applicable, or is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
(3)See Exhibit Index below.
(b) Exhibit Index:

(2)

Financial statement schedules – no financial statement schedules are presented as the required information is either not applicable, or is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

2.1 

(3)

See Exhibit Index below.

Page 61


(b) Exhibit Index:

2.1

2.2

3.1

AmendedandRestatedCertificateofIncorporationofJacobs Engineering Group Inc.FiledasExhibit3.1totheRegistrant’sCurrentReportonForm 8-K on January 28, 2014 and incorporated herein byreference.

3.2

4.1

3.2 

4.2

SeeArticleII,Section3.03ofArticleIII,ArticleVIandSections8.04 and 8.06 ofArticleVIIIofExhibit3.2.

10.1

AmendedandRestatedCreditAgreementdatedasofFebruary7,2014amongJacobsEngineeringGroupInc.andcertainofitssubsidiariesasborrowers,andtheBankofAmerica,N.A.(asAdministrativeAgent);BankofAmerica,N.A.,BNPParibas,andWells Fargo Bank, N.A. (as Co-Syndication Agents); The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, LTD, and TD Bank, N.A. (as Co-DocumentationAgents);MerrillLynch,Pierce,Fenner&SmithIncorporated(asSoleBookManager);andMerrillLynch,Pierce,Fenner&SmithIncorporated,BNPParibasSecuritiesCorp,andWellsFargoSecurities,LLC(asJointLeadArrangers).FiledasExhibit 10.1 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on February 11, 2014September 18, 2020 and incorporated herein byreference.

10.2

4.1†

10.1 

10.3

Amendment No. 2, dated as of September 28, 2017, among Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and the lenders thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of February 7, 2014, by and among Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., the lenders from time to time party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Current Report on Form 8-K on September 29, 2017March 28, 2019 and incorporated herein by reference.

10.4

10.2 

10.5

10.3 

10.4 
10.5 

10.6

Revolver Backstop Commitment Letter,Credit Agreement, dated August 1, 2017, by andas of March 25, 2020, among Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and Jacobs U.K. Limited, as borrowers, the lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A. as administrative agent, Bank of America, N.A., BNP Paribas and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as co-syndication agents, The Bank of Nova Scotia, HSBC Bank USA, National Association, USA, PNC Bank, National Association, TD Bank, N.A., Truist Bank and U.S. Bank National Association, as co-documentation agents, and BofA Securities, Inc., BNP Paribas Securities Corp. and The Bank of Nova Scotia.Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners. Filed as Exhibit 10.210.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on August 2, 2017March 27, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference.

Page 80


10.7#

10.8#

10.9#

EmploymentAgreementdatedDecember23,2010betweenJacobs Engineering Group Inc.andGaryMandel.FiledasExhibit10.6totheRegistrant’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of fiscal 20118-K/A on November 17, 2014 and incorporated herein byreference.

Page 62


10.10#

10.9#

10.11#

10.10#

10.12#

10.11#

10.13#

10.12#


10.14#

10.13#


10.15#

10.14#

10.16#

JacobsEngineeringGroupInc.401(k)PlusSavingsPlanandTrust,asamendedandrestatedApril1,2003.FiledasExhibit10.12tothe Registrant’s fiscal 2012 AnnualRegistrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-K10-Q for the third quarter of fiscal 2012 and incorporated herein byreference.

10.17#

10.15#

10.18#

10.16#

10.19#

10.17#

TheExecutiveSecurityProgramofJacobsEngineeringGroupInc.FiledasExhibit10.2totheRegistrant’sfiscal2014AnnualReporton Form 10-K and incorporated herein byreference.

10.20#

AmendmenttotheExecutiveSecurityProgramofJacobsEngineeringGroupInc.,datedDecember23,2008.FiledasExhibit10.3tothe Registrant’s fiscal 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein byreference.

10.21#

AmendmenttotheExecutiveSecurityProgramofJacobsEngineeringGroupInc.,datedMay31,2009.FiledasExhibit10.4totheRegistrant’s fiscal 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein byreference.

10.22#

JacobsEngineeringGroupInc.1991ExecutiveDeferralPlan,effectiveJune1,1991.FiledasExhibit10.5totheRegistrant’sfiscal2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein byreference.

10.23#

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 1993 Executive Deferral Plan, effective December 1, 1993. Filed as Exhibit 10.6 to theRegistrant’sfiscal 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein byreference.

10.24#

JacobsEngineeringGroupInc.1995ExecutiveDeferralPlan,effectiveJanuary1,1995.FiledasExhibit10.7totheRegistrant’sfiscal2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein byreference.

10.25#

JacobsEngineeringGroupInc.2005ExecutiveDeferralPlan,effectiveJanuary1,2005.FiledasExhibit10.1totheRegistrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and incorporated herein byreference.

10.26#

JacobsEngineeringGroupInc.AmendedandRestatedExecutiveDeferralPlan.FiledasExhibit10.8totheRegistrant’sfiscal2012Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein byreference.

10.27#

Page 63


10.28#

10.18#

10.29#

10.19#

JacobsEngineeringGroupInc.ManagementIncentivePlan,asamendedandrestatedeffectiveNovember19,2015.FiledasExhibit 10.50 to the Registrant’s fiscal 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein byreference.

10.30#

JacobsEngineeringGroupInc.1999StockIncentivePlan,asamendedandrestated.FiledasExhibit10.1totheRegistrant’s CurrentReportonForm8-KonJanuary28,2014andincorporatedhereinbyreference.

10.31#

10.32#

10.20#

10.33#

Formof Nonqualified StockOptionAgreement(awarded pursuant to the Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 1999 Outside Director Stock Incentive Plan).Plan, as amended and restated. FiledasExhibit10.3 10.11 totheRegistrant’s Registrant's QuarterlyReportonForm10-Qfor the secondfirst quarter of fiscal 20152018 and incorporated herein byreference.

10.34#

10.21#

10.35#

10.22#

10.36#

FormofRestrictedStockUnitAwardAgreement (awarded pursuant to the Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan).FiledasExhibit10.2totheRegistrant’sQuarterlyReportonForm10-Qforthesecond quarter of fiscal 2012 and incorporated herein byreference.

10.37#

FormofRestrictedStockUnitAgreement(awardedpursuanttothe Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 1999StockIncentivePlan).FiledasExhibit10.45totheRegistrant’s fiscal 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein byreference.

10.38#

Summary Description of Amendment to Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (with dividend equivalent rights) (awarded pursuant to the Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan). Filed as Exhibit 10.410.39 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter ofRegistrant's fiscal 2017 and incorporated herein by reference.

10.39†#

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (with dividend equivalent rights) (awardedpursuanttothe Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 1999StockIncentivePlan).

10.40#

FormofRestrictedStockUnitAwardAgreement(PerformanceShares-NetEarningsGrowth-2014Award) (awarded pursuant to the Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan).FiledasExhibit10.1totheRegistrant’sQuarterlyReportonForm10-Qforthethirdquarteroffiscal2014andincorporatedhereinbyreference.

10.41#

FormofRestrictedStockUnitAwardAgreement(PerformanceShares-TSR-2014Award) (awarded pursuant to the Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan).FiledasExhibit10.2totheRegistrant’sQuarterlyReportonForm10-Qforthethirdquarteroffiscal2014andincorporatedhereinbyreference.

10.42#

FormofRestrictedStockUnitAwardAgreement(PerformanceShares-NetEarningsGrowth – 2015 Award) (awarded pursuant to the Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan).FiledasExhibit10.2totheRegistrant’sQuarterlyReportonForm10-Qforthethirdquarteroffiscal2015andincorporatedhereinbyreference.

10.43#

FormofRestrictedStockUnitAgreement(PerformanceShares-EarningsPerShareGrowth – 2016 Award) (awarded pursuant to the Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan).FiledasExhibit10.46totheRegistrant’s fiscal 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein byreference.

Page 64


10.44#

FormofRestrictedStockUnitAgreement(PerformanceSharesTSR – 2016 Award) (awarded pursuant to the Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan).FiledasExhibit10.47totheRegistrant’sfiscal2015AnnualReport on Form 10-K and incorporated herein byreference.

10.23#

10.45†#

10.46†#

10.24#

Page 81


10.47#

10.25#

10.48#

FormofRestrictedStockAwardAgreement (awarded pursuant to the Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan).FiledasExhibit10.3totheRegistrant’sCurrentReportonForm8-KonJune1,2011and incorporated herein byreference.

10.49#

FormofRestrictedStockAgreement (awarded pursuant to the Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan).FiledasExhibit10.3totheRegistrant'sQuarterlyReportonForm 10-Q for the second quarter of fiscal 2012 and incorporated herein byreference.

10.50#

FormofRestrictedStockAgreement(awardedpursuanttothe Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.1999StockIncentivePlan).FiledasExhibit10.44totheRegistrant’sfiscal 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein byreference.

10.51#

10.26#

10.52#

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (awarded pursuant to the Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 1999 Outside Directors Stock Plan).  Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of fiscal 2017 and incorporated herein by reference.

†21

10.27#

†23

10.28#

10.29#
10.30#

10.31#
10.32#
10.33#
10.34#
10.35#
10.36
10.37# †
21†
23†

†31.1

31.1†

†31.2

31.2†

†32.1

32.1†

Page 82


†32.2

32.2†

†95.

101.INS†

Mine SafetyDisclosure.

†101.INS

XBRL Instance Document

†101.SCH

101.SCH†

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

†101.CAL

101.CAL†

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

†101.DEF

101.DEF†

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

†101.LAB

101.LAB†

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

†101.PRE

101.PRE†

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

104†XBRL Coverpage interactive data file


Being filed herewith.


#

#Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

Page 65


SIGNATURES


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.

Dated:

November 21, 2017

24, 2020

By:

/S/ Steven J. Demetriou

Steven J. Demetriou

Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and Chairman

(Principal(Principal Executive Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Page 83


Signature

Title

Date

Signature

TitleDate
/S/ Steven J. Demetriou

ChairmanChair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

November 21, 2017

24, 2020

Steven J. Demetriou

/S/ Joseph R. Bronson

Director

November 21, 2017

24, 2020

Joseph R. Bronson

/S/ Juan Jose Suarez Coppel

Vincent K. Brooks

Director

November 21, 2017

24, 2020

Juan Jose Suarez Coppel

Vincent K. Brooks

/S/ Robert C. Davidson, Jr.

Director

November 21, 2017

24, 2020

Robert C. Davidson, Jr.

/S/ Ralph E. Eberhart

Director

November 21, 2017

24, 2020

Ralph E. Eberhart

/S/ Dawne S. Hickton

Manny Fernandez

Director

November 21, 2017

24, 2020

Dawne S. Hickton

Manny Fernandez

/S/ Georgette D. Kiser

DirectorNovember 24, 2020
Georgette D. Kiser
/S/ Linda Fayne Levinson

Director

November 21, 2017

24, 2020

Linda Fayne Levinson

/S/ Barbara L. Loughran

DirectorNovember 24, 2020
Barbara L. Loughran
/S/ Robert A. McNamara

Director

November 21, 2017

24, 2020

Robert A. McNamara

/S/ Peter J. Robertson

Director

November 21, 2017

24, 2020

Peter J. Robertson

/S/ Christopher M.T. Thompson

Director

November 21, 2017

24, 2020

Christopher M.T. Thompson

/S/ Kevin C. Berryman

Executive Vice President,


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)

November 21, 2017

24, 2020

Kevin C. Berryman

/S/ William B. Allen

Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer


(Principal Accounting Officer)

November 21, 2017

24, 2020

William B. Allen




Page 66

84


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

WITH REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

September 29, 2017

October 2, 2020
F-1




JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 29, 2017

October 2, 2020

F-8

F-53



F-2



JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share information)

At September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

October 2, 2020September 27, 2019

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

Current Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

774,151

 

 

$

655,716

 

Cash and cash equivalents$862,424 $631,068 

Receivables

 

 

2,102,543

 

 

 

2,115,663

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

119,486

 

 

 

93,091

 

Receivables and contract assetsReceivables and contract assets3,167,310 2,840,209 
Prepaid expenses and otherPrepaid expenses and other162,355 189,358 
Investment in equity securitiesInvestment in equity securities347,510 451,133 

Total current assets

 

 

2,996,180

 

 

 

2,864,470

 

Total current assets4,539,599 4,111,768 

Property, Equipment, and Improvements, net

 

 

349,911

 

 

 

319,673

 

Property, Equipment and Improvements, netProperty, Equipment and Improvements, net319,371 308,143 

Other Noncurrent Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Noncurrent Assets:

Goodwill

 

 

3,009,826

 

 

 

3,079,628

 

Goodwill5,639,091 5,432,544 

Intangibles, net

 

 

332,920

 

 

 

336,922

 

Intangibles, net658,340 665,076 
Deferred income tax assetsDeferred income tax assets211,047 514,633 
Operating lease right-of-use assetsOperating lease right-of-use assets576,915 

Miscellaneous

 

 

692,022

 

 

 

759,329

 

Miscellaneous409,990 430,547 

Total other noncurrent assets

 

 

4,034,768

 

 

 

4,175,879

 

Total other noncurrent assets7,495,383 7,042,800 

 

$

7,380,859

 

 

$

7,360,022

 

$12,354,353 $11,462,711 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Liabilities:

Notes payable

 

$

3,071

 

 

$

2,421

 

Short-term debtShort-term debt$$199,901 

Accounts payable

 

 

683,605

 

 

 

522,427

 

Accounts payable1,061,754 1,072,645 

Accrued liabilities

 

 

939,687

 

 

 

938,378

 

Accrued liabilities1,249,883 1,386,952 

Billings in excess of costs

 

 

299,864

 

 

 

319,460

 

Operating lease liabilityOperating lease liability164,312 
Contract liabilitiesContract liabilities465,648 414,208 

Total current liabilities

 

 

1,926,227

 

 

 

1,782,686

 

Total current liabilities2,941,597 3,073,706 

Long-term Debt

 

 

235,000

 

 

 

385,330

 

Other Deferred Liabilities

 

 

732,281

 

 

 

861,824

 

Long-term debtLong-term debt1,676,941 1,201,245 
Liabilities relating to defined benefit pension and retirement plansLiabilities relating to defined benefit pension and retirement plans568,176 575,897 
Deferred income tax liabilitiesDeferred income tax liabilities3,366 233,111 
Long-term operating lease liabilityLong-term operating lease liability735,202 
Other deferred liabilitiesOther deferred liabilities573,404 610,094 

Commitments and Contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and Contingencies

Stockholders’ Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ Equity:

Capital stock:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital stock:

Preferred stock, $1 par value, authorized—1,000,000 shares; issued and

outstanding—none

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $1 par value, authorized—240,000,000 shares; issued and

outstanding—120,385,544 shares and 120,950,899 shares as of September 29,

2017 and September 30, 2016, respectively

 

 

120,386

 

 

 

120,951

 

Preferred stock, $1 par value, authorized - 1,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding - NaNPreferred stock, $1 par value, authorized - 1,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding - NaN
Common stock, $1 par value, authorized - 240,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding - 129,747,783 shares and 132,879,395 shares as of October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019, respectivelyCommon stock, $1 par value, authorized - 240,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding - 129,747,783 shares and 132,879,395 shares as of October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019, respectively129,748 132,879 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

1,239,782

 

 

 

1,168,272

 

Additional paid-in capital2,598,446 2,559,450 

Retained earnings

 

 

3,721,698

 

 

 

3,586,647

 

Retained earnings4,020,575 3,939,174 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(653,514

)

 

 

(610,594

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss(933,057)(916,812)

Total Jacobs stockholders’ equity

 

 

4,428,352

 

 

 

4,265,276

 

Total Jacobs stockholders’ equity5,815,712 5,714,691 

Noncontrolling interests

 

 

58,999

 

 

 

64,906

 

Noncontrolling interests39,955 53,967 

Total Group stockholders’ equity

 

 

4,487,351

 

 

 

4,330,182

 

Total Group stockholders’ equity5,855,667 5,768,658 

 

$

7,380,859

 

 

$

7,360,022

 

$12,354,353 $11,462,711 

See the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-3



JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

For the Fiscal Years Ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016, and October 2, 2015

2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018

(In thousands, except per share information)

 

 

September 29,
2017

 

 

September 30,
2016

 

 

October 2,
2015

 

Revenues

 

$

10,022,788

 

 

$

10,964,157

 

 

$

12,114,832

 

Costs and Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Direct costs of contracts

 

 

(8,250,536

)

 

 

(9,196,326

)

 

 

(10,146,494

)

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

(1,379,983

)

 

 

(1,429,233

)

 

 

(1,522,811

)

Operating Profit

 

 

392,269

 

 

 

338,598

 

 

 

445,527

 

Other Income (Expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

 

8,748

 

 

 

7,848

 

 

 

7,262

 

Interest expense

 

 

(12,035

)

 

 

(15,260

)

 

 

(19,503

)

Gain/(Loss) on disposal of business and investments

 

 

10,880

 

 

 

(41,410

)

 

 

(2,909

)

Miscellaneous expense, net

 

 

(6,645

)

 

 

(3,053

)

 

 

(240

)

Total other income (expense), net

 

 

948

 

 

 

(51,875

)

 

 

(15,390

)

Earnings Before Taxes

 

 

393,217

 

 

 

286,723

 

 

 

430,137

 

Income Tax Expense

 

 

(105,842

)

 

 

(72,208

)

 

 

(101,255

)

Net Earnings of the Group

 

 

287,375

 

 

 

214,515

 

 

 

328,882

 

Net Loss (Earnings) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

 

 

6,352

 

 

 

(4,052

)

 

 

(25,911

)

Net Earnings Attributable to Jacobs

 

$

293,727

 

 

$

210,463

 

 

$

302,971

 

Net Earnings Per Share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

2.43

 

 

$

1.75

 

 

$

2.42

 

Diluted

 

$

2.42

 

 

$

1.73

 

 

$

2.40

 

October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Revenues$13,566,975 $12,737,868 $10,579,773 
Direct cost of contracts(10,980,307)(10,260,840)(8,421,223)
Gross profit2,586,668 2,477,028 2,158,550 
Selling, general and administrative expenses(2,050,695)(2,072,177)(1,771,107)
Operating Profit535,973 404,851 387,443 
Other Income (Expense):
Interest income4,729 9,487 8,984 
Interest expense(62,206)(83,847)(76,760)
Miscellaneous (expense) income, net(37,293)20,468 11,314 
Total other expense, net(94,770)(53,892)(56,462)
Earnings from Continuing Operations Before Taxes441,203 350,959 330,981 
Income Tax Expense for Continuing Operations(55,320)(36,954)(325,632)
Net Earnings of the Group from Continuing Operations385,883 314,005 5,349 
Net Earnings of the Group from Discontinued Operations137,984 559,214 167,793 
Net Earnings of the Group523,867 873,219 173,142 
Net Earnings Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests from Continuing Operations(32,022)(23,045)(9,534)
Net Earnings (Loss) Attributable to Jacobs from Continuing Operations353,861 290,960 (4,185)
Net Earnings Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests from Discontinued Operations(2,195)(177)
Net Earnings Attributable to Jacobs from Discontinued Operations137,984 557,019 167,616 
Net Earnings Attributable to Jacobs$491,845 $847,979 $163,431 
Net Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
Basic Net Earnings (Loss) from Continuing Operations Per Share$2.69 $2.11 $(0.03)
Basic Net Earnings from Discontinued Operations Per Share$1.05 $4.03 $1.21 
Basic Earnings Per Share$3.74 $6.14 $1.18 
Diluted Net Earnings (Loss) from Continuing Operations Per Share$2.67 $2.09 $(0.03)
Diluted Net Earnings from Discontinued Operations Per Share$1.04 $4.00 $1.21 
Diluted Earnings Per Share$3.71 $6.08 $1.18 

See the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-4



JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

For the Fiscal Years Ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016, and October 2, 2015

2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018

(In thousands)

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Net Earnings of the Group

 

$

287,375

 

 

$

214,515

 

 

$

328,882

 

Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

 

(140,527

)

 

 

(46,515

)

 

 

(136,168

)

Change in pension liability

 

 

123,427

 

 

 

(111,488

)

 

 

33,208

 

(Losses) Gains on cash flow hedges

 

 

(1,350

)

 

 

(1,403

)

 

 

2,949

 

Other Comprehensive Loss Before Income Taxes

 

 

(18,450

)

 

 

(159,406

)

 

 

(100,011

)

Income Tax (Expense) Benefit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in pension liability

 

 

(24,380

)

 

 

13,303

 

 

 

(438

)

(Losses) Gains on cash flow hedges

 

 

(90

)

 

 

273

 

 

 

(766

)

Income Tax (Expense) Benefit

 

 

(24,470

)

 

 

13,576

 

 

 

(1,204

)

Net Other Comprehensive Loss

 

 

(42,920

)

 

 

(145,830

)

 

 

(101,215

)

Net Comprehensive Income of the Group

 

 

244,455

 

 

 

68,685

 

 

 

227,667

 

Net Comprehensive Loss (Income) Attributable to Noncontrolling

   Interests

 

 

6,352

 

 

 

(4,052

)

 

 

(25,911

)

Total Comprehensive Income

 

$

250,807

 

 

$

64,633

 

 

$

201,756

 

October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Net Earnings of the Group$523,867 $873,219 $173,142 
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment64,052 15,972 (109,877)
Gain (loss) on cash flow hedges(21,883)1,369 118 
Change in pension and retiree medical plan liabilities(75,334)(157,632)(27,231)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before taxes(33,165)(140,291)(136,990)
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit:
Foreign currency translation adjustment(3,722)
Cash flow hedges7,285 (568)859 
Change in pension and retiree medical plan liabilities13,357 30,750 (17,058)
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit:16,920 30,182 (16,199)
Net other comprehensive income (loss)(16,245)(110,109)(153,189)
Net Comprehensive Income (Loss) of the Group507,622 763,110 19,953 
Net (Earnings) Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests(32,022)(25,240)(9,711)
Net Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to Jacobs$475,600 $737,870 $10,242 

See the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements including the Company's note on
Other Comprehensive IncomeFinancial Information for a presentation of amounts reclassified to net income during the period.

F-5



JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the Fiscal Years Ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016, and October 2, 2015

2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Comp-

 

 

Jacobs

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group

 

Common StockAdditional
Paid-in
Capital
Retained EarningsAccumulated Other Comprehensive
Income
(Loss)
Total Jacobs Stockholders’ EquityNoncontrolling InterestsTotal Group Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

 

rehensive

 

 

Stock-

 

 

Non-

 

 

Stock-

 

 

Common

 

 

Paid-in

 

 

Retained

 

 

Income

 

 

holders’

 

 

controlling

 

 

holders’

 

 

Stock

 

 

Capital

 

 

Earnings

 

 

(Loss)

 

 

Equity

 

 

Interests

 

 

Equity

 

Balances at September 26, 2014

 

$

131,753

 

 

$

1,173,858

 

 

$

3,527,193

 

 

$

(363,549

)

 

$

4,469,255

 

 

$

36,405

 

 

$

4,505,660

 

Balances at September 29, 2017Balances at September 29, 2017$120,386 $1,239,782 $3,721,698 $(653,514)$4,428,352 $58,999 $4,487,351 

Net earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

302,971

 

 

 

 

 

 

302,971

 

 

 

25,911

 

 

 

328,882

 

Net earnings— — 163,431 — 163,431 9,711 173,142 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(136,168

)

 

 

(136,168

)

 

 

 

 

 

(136,168

)

Foreign currency translation adjustments— — — (109,877)(109,877)— (109,877)

Pension liability, net of deferred taxes of $438

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32,770

 

 

 

32,770

 

 

 

 

 

 

32,770

 

Gain on derivatives, net of deferred

taxes of $766

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,183

 

 

 

2,183

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,183

 

Noncontrolling interest

acquired / consolidated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9,709

)

 

 

 

 

 

(9,709

)

 

 

9,627

 

 

 

(82

)

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7,230

)

 

 

(7,230

)

Issuances of equity securities, net of

deferred taxes of $10,332

 

 

1,590

 

 

 

80,801

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

82,391

 

 

 

 

 

 

82,391

 

Repurchases of equity securities

 

 

(10,190

)

 

 

(117,515

)

 

 

(324,243

)

 

 

 

 

 

(451,948

)

 

 

 

 

 

(451,948

)

Balances at October 2, 2015

 

$

123,153

 

 

$

1,137,144

 

 

$

3,496,212

 

 

$

(464,764

)

 

$

4,291,745

 

 

$

64,713

 

 

$

4,356,458

 

Net earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

210,463

 

 

 

 

 

 

210,463

 

 

 

4,052

 

 

 

214,515

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(46,516

)

 

 

(46,516

)

 

 

 

 

 

(46,516

)

Pension liability, net of deferred taxes of

$13,303

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(98,185

)

 

 

(98,185

)

 

 

 

 

 

(98,185

)

Loss on derivatives, net of deferred

taxes of $274

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,129

)

 

 

(1,129

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1,129

)

Noncontrolling interest

acquired / consolidated

 

 

 

 

 

(127

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(127

)

 

 

(1,150

)

 

 

(1,277

)

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,146

)

 

 

 

 

 

(3,146

)

 

 

(2,709

)

 

 

(5,855

)

Issuances of equity securities, net of

deferred taxes of $3,382

 

 

1,351

 

 

 

72,055

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

73,406

 

 

 

 

 

 

73,406

 

Repurchases of equity securities

 

 

(3,553

)

 

 

(40,800

)

 

 

(116,882

)

 

 

 

 

 

(161,235

)

 

 

 

 

 

(161,235

)

Balances at September 30, 2016

 

$

120,951

 

 

$

1,168,272

 

 

$

3,586,647

 

 

$

(610,594

)

 

$

4,265,276

 

 

$

64,906

 

 

$

4,330,182

 

Net earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

293,727

 

 

 

 

 

 

293,727

 

 

 

(6,352

)

 

 

287,375

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(140,527

)

 

 

(140,527

)

 

 

 

 

 

(140,527

)

Pension liability, net of deferred taxes

of $24,380

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

99,047

 

 

 

99,047

 

 

 

 

 

 

99,047

 

Loss on derivatives, net of deferred

taxes of $90

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,440

)

 

 

(1,440

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1,440

)

Pension and retiree medical plan liability, net of deferred taxes of $17,058Pension and retiree medical plan liability, net of deferred taxes of $17,058— — 10,160 (44,289)(34,129)— (34,129)
Gain on derivatives, net of deferred taxes of $(859)Gain on derivatives, net of deferred taxes of $(859)— — — 977 977 — 977 

Noncontrolling interest acquired /

consolidated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

445

 

 

 

445

 

Noncontrolling interest acquired / consolidated— 3,456 — — 3,456 33,690 37,146 

Dividends

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(72,765

)

 

 

 

 

 

(72,765

)

 

 

 

 

 

(72,765

)

Dividends— — (85,608)— (85,608)— (85,608)

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4,559

)

 

 

 

 

 

(4,559

)

 

 

 

 

 

(4,559

)

Distributions to noncontrolling interests— — 7,705 — 7,705 (12,391)(4,686)

Issuances of equity securities, net of

deferred taxes of $1,015

 

 

1,468

 

 

 

99,117

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100,585

 

 

 

 

 

 

100,585

 

Stock based compensationStock based compensation— 81,196 (1,954)— 79,242 — 79,242 
Issuances of equity securitiesIssuances of equity securities21,881 1,385,316 (3,420)— 1,403,777 — 1,403,777 

Repurchases of equity securities

 

 

(2,033

)

 

 

(27,607

)

 

 

(81,352

)

 

 

 

 

 

(110,992

)

 

 

 

 

 

(110,992

)

Repurchases of equity securities(49)(911)(2,021)— (2,981)— (2,981)

Balances at September 29, 2017

 

$

120,386

 

 

$

1,239,782

 

 

$

3,721,698

 

 

$

(653,514

)

 

$

4,428,352

 

 

$

58,999

 

 

$

4,487,351

 

Balances at September 28, 2018Balances at September 28, 2018$142,218 $2,708,839 $3,809,991 $(806,703)$5,854,345 $90,009 $5,944,354 
Net earningsNet earnings— — 847,979 — 847,979 25,240 873,219 
Disposition of ECR business, net of deferred taxes of $5,402Disposition of ECR business, net of deferred taxes of $5,402— — — 112,764 112,764 (45,727)67,037 
Adoption of ASC 606, net of deferred taxes of $(10,825)Adoption of ASC 606, net of deferred taxes of $(10,825)— — (37,209)— (37,209)— (37,209)
Foreign currency translation adjustmentsForeign currency translation adjustments— — — (84,456)(84,456)— (84,456)
Pension and retiree medical plan liability, net of deferred taxes of $25,348Pension and retiree medical plan liability, net of deferred taxes of $25,348— — — (139,218)(139,218)— (139,218)
Gain on derivatives, net of deferred taxes of $568Gain on derivatives, net of deferred taxes of $568— — — 801 801 — 801 
Noncontrolling interest acquired /
consolidated
Noncontrolling interest acquired /
consolidated
— (1,113)— — (1,113)— (1,113)
DividendsDividends— — (92,980)— (92,980)— (92,980)
Distributions to noncontrolling interestsDistributions to noncontrolling interests— — — — — (15,555)(15,555)
Stock based compensationStock based compensation— 69,128 — 69,137 — 69,137 
Issuances of equity securities including shares withheld for taxesIssuances of equity securities including shares withheld for taxes1,681 43,508 (6,872)— 38,317 — 38,317 
Repurchases of equity securitiesRepurchases of equity securities(11,020)(260,912)(581,744)— (853,676)— (853,676)
Balances at September 27, 2019Balances at September 27, 2019$132,879 $2,559,450 $3,939,174 $(916,812)$5,714,691 $53,967 $5,768,658 
Net earningsNet earnings— — 491,845 — 491,845 32,022 523,867 
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of deferred taxes of $3,722Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of deferred taxes of $3,722— — — 60,330 60,330 — 60,330 
Pension and retiree medical plan liability, net of deferred taxes of $(13,357)Pension and retiree medical plan liability, net of deferred taxes of $(13,357)— — — (61,977)(61,977)— (61,977)
(Loss) Gain on derivatives, net of deferred taxes of $(7,285)(Loss) Gain on derivatives, net of deferred taxes of $(7,285)— — — (14,598)(14,598)— (14,598)
DividendsDividends— — (99,921)— (99,921)— (99,921)
Noncontrolling interests - distributions and otherNoncontrolling interests - distributions and other— 5,002 — — 5,002 (46,034)(41,032)
Stock based compensationStock based compensation— 47,048 1,102 — 48,150 — 48,150 
Issuances of equity securities including shares withheld for taxesIssuances of equity securities including shares withheld for taxes998 17,890 (9,447)— 9,441 — 9,441 
Repurchases of equity securitiesRepurchases of equity securities(4,129)(30,944)(302,178)— (337,251)— (337,251)
Balances at October 2, 2020Balances at October 2, 2020$129,748 $2,598,446 $4,020,575 $(933,057)$5,815,712 $39,955 $5,855,667 

See the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-6



JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Fiscal Years Ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016, and October 2, 2015

2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018

(In thousands)

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net earnings attributable to the Group

 

$

287,375

 

 

$

214,515

 

 

$

328,882

 

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash flows provided by operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, equipment and improvements

 

 

76,418

 

 

 

82,363

 

 

 

99,924

 

Intangible assets

 

 

46,095

 

 

 

47,608

 

 

 

49,368

 

(Gain) Loss on sales of investments

 

 

(10,880

)

 

 

17,049

 

 

 

 

Loss on sales of business

 

 

822

 

 

 

24,361

 

 

 

2,909

 

Gain on benefit plan change

 

 

(9,955

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock based compensation

 

 

38,764

 

 

 

32,370

 

 

 

41,412

 

Tax deficiency from stock based compensation

 

 

(2,877

)

 

 

(377

)

 

 

(1,237

)

Equity in losses (earnings) of operating ventures, net

 

 

(7,788

)

 

 

(11,892

)

 

 

5,483

 

Change in pension plan obligations

 

 

(26,990

)

 

 

(9,380

)

 

 

(5,980

)

Change in deferred compensation plans

 

 

(531

)

 

 

576

 

 

 

(3,229

)

Losses on disposals of assets, net

 

 

14,876

 

 

 

10,680

 

 

 

30,985

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

36,663

 

 

 

(27,407

)

 

 

(31,177

)

Changes in assets and liabilities, excluding the effects of businesses acquired:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Receivables

 

 

75,441

 

 

 

397,268

 

 

 

172,958

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

(23,755

)

 

 

17,906

 

 

 

6,644

 

Accounts payable

 

 

153,961

 

 

 

(44,214

)

 

 

(28,943

)

Accrued liabilities

 

 

(56,279

)

 

 

(71,930

)

 

 

(120,847

)

Billings in excess of costs

 

 

(31,976

)

 

 

33,347

 

 

 

(52,441

)

Income taxes payable

 

 

4,264

 

 

 

(4,586

)

 

 

(22,685

)

Other deferred liabilities

 

 

(6,026

)

 

 

(28,801

)

 

 

(15,759

)

Deferred gain on synthetic lease transaction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23,343

 

Other, net

 

 

17,259

 

 

 

717

 

 

 

4,962

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

574,881

 

 

 

680,173

 

 

 

484,572

 

Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additions to property and equipment

 

 

(118,060

)

 

 

(67,688

)

 

 

(88,404

)

Disposals of property and equipment

 

 

2,387

 

 

 

10,479

 

 

 

369

 

Purchases of intangibles

 

 

 

 

 

(10,027

)

 

 

 

Purchases of investments

 

 

 

 

 

(3,403

)

 

 

 

Sales of investments

 

 

31,701

 

 

 

 

 

 

13

 

Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired

 

 

(150,190

)

 

 

(49,943

)

 

 

(8,101

)

Sales of business

 

 

(2,036

)

 

 

(19,039

)

 

 

 

Net cash used for investing activities

 

 

(236,198

)

 

 

(139,621

)

 

 

(96,123

)

Cash Flows Used for Financing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from long-term borrowings

 

 

1,694,023

 

 

 

1,649,653

 

 

 

1,768,639

 

Repayments of long-term borrowings

 

 

(1,846,797

)

 

 

(1,840,789

)

 

 

(1,907,109

)

Proceeds from short-term borrowings

 

 

1,347

 

 

 

3,040

 

 

 

362,433

 

Repayments of short-term borrowings

 

 

(702

)

 

 

(14,042

)

 

 

(382,190

)

Proceeds from issuances of common stock

 

 

62,645

 

 

 

43,140

 

 

 

33,222

 

Common stock repurchases

 

 

(97,180

)

 

 

(152,550

)

 

 

(422,316

)

Excess tax benefits from stock based compensation

 

 

2,877

 

 

 

377

 

 

 

1,237

 

Cash dividends

 

 

(54,234

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests

 

 

(4,559

)

 

 

(5,855

)

 

 

(7,230

)

Net cash used for financing activities

 

 

(242,580

)

 

 

(317,026

)

 

 

(553,314

)

Effect of Exchange Rate Changes

 

 

22,332

 

 

 

(28,669

)

 

 

(106,923

)

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

 

118,435

 

 

 

194,857

 

 

 

(271,788

)

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period

 

 

655,716

 

 

 

460,859

 

 

 

732,647

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

 

$

774,151

 

 

$

655,716

 

 

$

460,859

 

October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net earnings attributable to the Group$523,867 $873,219 $173,142 
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash flows provided by (used for) operations:
Depreciation and amortization:
Property, equipment and improvements91,070 90,171 117,856 
Intangible assets90,563 79,098 80,731 
      Gain on sale of ECR business(110,236)(935,110)
 Loss on disposal of other businesses and investments9,608 20,967 
 Loss on investment in equity securities103,623 78,108 
Stock based compensation48,150 69,137 79,242 
Equity in earnings of operating ventures, net of return on capital distributions9,172 (8,784)(2,639)
Loss on disposals of assets, net766 6,222 17,491 
Impairment of long-lived assets162,238 
 Loss (Gain) on pension and retiree medical plan changes4,598 (33,087)5,414 
Deferred income taxes82,275 (105,939)288,126 
Changes in assets and liabilities, excluding the effects of businesses acquired:


Receivables and contract assets, net of contract liabilities(107,784)(67,894)(428,930)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets(27,280)(13,117)(19,134)
Accounts payable(92,838)295,146 183,057 
Income taxes payable35,194 (294,995)68,970 
Accrued liabilities(27,849)(305,716)(37,746)
Other deferred liabilities(64,390)(106,256)(79,280)
Other, net85,710 3,753 13,885 
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities806,849 (366,436)481,152 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:


Additions to property and equipment(118,269)(135,977)(94,884)
Disposals of property and equipment and other assets96 7,177 3,293 
Capital contributions to equity investees, net of return of capital distributions(12,278)(8,761)(5,416)
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired(293,580)(575,110)(1,488,336)
Disposals of investment in equity securities64,708 
(Payments) proceeds related to sales of businesses(5,061)2,801,425 7,736 
      Purchases of noncontrolling interests(1,113)
Net cash (used for) provided by investing activities(429,092)2,152,349 (1,577,607)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:


Proceeds from long-term borrowings2,986,661 2,782,193 5,784,355 
Repayments of long-term borrowings(2,521,467)(3,996,970)(4,572,182)
Proceeds from short-term borrowings78 200,001 712 
Repayments of short-term borrowings(200,008)(28,566)(3,391)
Debt issuance costs(1,807)(3,915)
Proceeds from issuances of common stock37,235 64,958 53,584 
Common stock repurchases(337,251)(853,676)(2,981)
Taxes paid on vested restricted stock(27,794)(26,641)(31,108)
Cash dividends, including to noncontrolling interests(143,962)(106,396)(86,569)
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities(208,315)(1,969,012)1,142,420 
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes61,914 20,809 (26,758)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents231,356 (162,290)19,207 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at the Beginning of the Period631,068 793,358 774,151 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at the End of the Period862,424 631,068 793,358 
Less Cash and Cash Equivalents included in Assets held for Sale(158,488)
Cash and Cash Equivalents of Continuing Operations at the End of the Period$862,424 $631,068 $634,870 

See the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-7


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


1.Description of Business and Basis of Presentation

Description of Business

Jacobs is a leading global professional services company that designs and deploys technology-centric solutions to solve many of the world’s most complex challenges. We operate in 2 lines of business: Critical Mission Solutions and People & Places Solutions.
We provide a broad range of technical, professional and construction services including engineering, design and architectural services; construction and construction management services; operations and maintenance services; and process, scientific and systems consulting services. We provide our services through offices and subsidiaries located primarily in North America, South America, Europe, the Middle East, India, Australia, Africa,New Zealand and Asia. We provide our services under cost-reimbursable and fixed-price contracts.contracts, with our fixed-price contracts comprised mainly of professional services arrangements and in some limited cases, construction. The percentage of revenues realized from each of these types of contracts for the fiscal years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 20152020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018 was as follows:

 

For the Year Ended

 

For the Years Ended

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

October 2, 2020September 27, 2019 September 28, 2018

Cost-reimbursable

 

 

81%

 

 

 

82

%

 

 

83

%

Cost-reimbursable76%76%74%

Fixed-price

 

 

19%

 

 

 

18

%

 

 

17

%

Fixed-price24%24%26%

Basis of Presentation, Definition of Fiscal Year, and Other Matters

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("U.S. GAAPGAAP") and include the accounts of Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliates which it controls. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Friday closest to September 30 (determined on the basis of the number of workdays) and, accordingly, an additional week of activity is added every five -to- sixfive-to-six years. Fiscal 20152020 included an extra week of activity.

During

Effective the second quarterbeginning of fiscal 2016, we reorganized our operating and reporting structure around four lines of business (“LOB”).  This reorganization is intended to better serve our global clients, leverage our workforce, help streamline operations, and provide enhanced growth opportunities.  The four global LOBs are: Petroleum & Chemicals, Buildings & Infrastructure, Aerospace & Technology, and Industrial. Previously,first quarter 2020, the Company operated its business asadopted ASU 2016-02, Leases ("ASC 842"), including the subsequent ASU's that amended and clarified the related guidance. The Company adopted ASC 842 using a single segment.  For a further discussionmodified retrospective approach, and accordingly the new guidance was applied to leases that existed or were entered into after the first day of our segment information, please refer to Note 15-Segment Information.

adoption without adjusting the comparative periods presented. Please refer to Note 17— Definitions10- Leases for a discussion of our updated policies and disclosures related to leases.

Effective the definitionsbeginning of certain terms used infiscal first quarter 2019, the accompanying Consolidated Financial StatementsCompany adopted ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, including the subsequent ASUs that amended and these Notesclarified the related guidance. The Company adopted ASC Topic 606 using the modified retrospective method, and accordingly the new guidance was applied retrospectively to Consolidated Financial Statements.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

contracts that were not completed or substantially completed as of September 29, 2018 (the date of initial application). Please refer to Note 3- Revenue Accounting for Contracts.

On March 6, 2020, a subsidiary of Jacobs completed the acquisition of the nuclear consulting, remediation and Useprogram management business of Joint Ventures

John Wood Group, a U.K.-based energy services company, for an enterprise value of £246 million, or approximately $317.9 million, less cash acquired of $24.3 million. The Company has recorded its preliminary purchase price allocation associated with the acquisition, which is summarized in Note 14- Business Combinations.

On June 12, 2019, Jacobs completed the acquisition of The KeyW Holding Corporation (“KeyW”), a U.S.-based national security solutions provider to the intelligence, cyber, and counterterrorism communities by acquiring 100% of the outstanding shares of KeyW common stock. The Company paid total consideration of $902.6 million which was comprised of approximately $604.2 million in cash to the former stockholders and certain equity award holders of KeyW and the assumption of KeyW’s debt of approximately $298.4 million. The Company repaid all of the assumed
F-8

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
KeyW debt by the end of the fourth fiscal quarter of 2019. The Company has recorded its final purchase price allocation associated with the acquisition, which is summarized in Note 14- Business Combinations.
On April 26, 2019, Jacobs completed the sale of its Energy, Chemicals and Resources ("ECR") business to Worley Limited, a company incorporated in Australia ("Worley"), for a purchase price of $3.4 billion consisting of (i) $2.8 billion in cash plus (ii) 58.2 million ordinary shares of Worley, subject to adjustments for changes in working capital and certain other items (the “ECR sale”). As a result of the ECR sale, substantially all ECR-related assets and liabilities have been sold (the "Disposal Group"). We recognize revenue earneddetermined that the Disposal Group should be reported as discontinued operations in accordance with ASC 210-05, Discontinued Operations because their disposal represents a strategic shift that had a major effect on our technical professionaloperations and field services projectsfinancial results. As such, the financial results of the ECR business are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings as discontinued operations for all periods presented. As of the year ended September 27, 2019, a portion of the ECR business remained held by Jacobs and continued to be classified as held for sale in accordance with U.S. GAAP. As of October 2, 2020, all of the ECR business to be sold under the percentage-of-completion method describedterms of the sale has been conveyed to Worley and as such, no amounts remain held for sale. For further discussion see Note 15- Sale of Energy, Chemicals and Resources ("ECR") Business to the consolidated financial statements.
    On December 15, 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of CH2M HILL Companies, Ltd. ("CH2M"), an international provider of engineering, construction, and technical services, by acquiring 100% of the outstanding shares of CH2M common stock and preferred stock. The Company paid total consideration of approximately $1.8 billion in cash (excluding $315.2 million of cash acquired) and issued approximately $1.4 billion of Jacobs’ common stock, or 20.7 million shares, to the former stockholders and certain equity award holders of CH2M. In connection with the acquisition, the Company also assumed CH2M’s revolving credit facility and second lien notes, including a $20.0 million prepayment penalty, which totaled approximately $700 million of long-term debt. Immediately following the effective time of the acquisition, the Company repaid CH2M’s revolving credit facility and second lien notes including the related prepayment penalty. The Company has finalized its purchase accounting processes associated with the acquisition, which is summarized in Note 14- Business Combinations.
2.Significant Accounting Policies
Revenue Accounting for Contracts
Engineering, Procurement & Construction Contracts and Service Contracts
On September 29, 2018, the Company adopted ASC 605-35, Construction-TypeTopic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, including the subsequent ASUs that amended and Production-Type Contracts. In general, we recognize revenues atclarified the related guidance. The Company recognizes engineering, procurement, and construction contract revenue over time, we provide services. Pre-contract costsas performance obligations are satisfied, due to the continuous transfer of control to the customer. Upon adoption of ASC Topic 606, contracts which include engineering, procurement and construction services are generally expensedaccounted for as incurred.  Contractsa single deliverable (a single performance obligation) and are generallyno longer segmented between types of services. In some instances, the Company’s services associated with a construction activity are limited to specific tasks such as project services and construction, and accordingly, gross margin related to each activity is recognized as those separatecustomer support, consulting or supervisory services. In these instances, the services are rendered. For multiple contracts with a single customer we account for each contract separately.

typically identified as separate performance obligations.

The Company recognizes revenue using the percentage-of-completion method, of accounting is applied by comparingbased primarily on contract costs incurred to date compared to total estimated contract costs. The percentage-of-completion method (an input method) is the most representative depiction of the Company’s performance because it directly measures the value of the services transferred to the customer. Subcontractor materials, labor and equipment and, in certain cases, customer-furnished materials and labor and equipment are included in revenue and cost of revenue when management believes that the company is acting as a principal rather than as an agent (e.g., the company integrates the materials, labor and equipment into the deliverables promised to the customer or is otherwise primarily responsible for fulfillment and acceptability of the materials, labor and/or equipment). The Company recognizes revenue, but not profit, on certain uninstalled materials that are not specifically produced, fabricated, or constructed for a project. Revenue on these uninstalled materials is recognized when control is transferred. Changes to total estimated costs at completion. On cost-reimbursable contracts, thecontract cost of materials and subcontractsor losses, if any, are generally excluded from the calculation of the measure of progress towards completion to provide a more meaningful allocation of income. Contract losses are provided for in their entiretyrecognized in the period in which they become known, without regardare determined as assessed at the contract level. Pre-contract costs are expensed as incurred unless they are expected to be recovered from the client. Project mobilization costs are generally charged to project costs as incurred when they are an integrated part of the performance obligation being transferred to the percentage-of-completion.

Unapproved change ordersclient. Under the typical payment terms of our engineering, procurement and construction contracts, amounts are includedbilled as work progresses in accordance with agreed-upon contractual terms at periodic intervals (e.g., biweekly or monthly) and customer payments are typically due within 30 to 60 days of billing, depending on the contract price to the extent it is probable that such change orders will result in additional contract revenue and the amount of such additional revenue can be reliably estimated. Claims meeting these recognition criteria are included in revenues only to the extent of the related costs incurred.

F-8

contract.
F-9

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Certain cost-reimbursable

For service contracts, the Company recognizes revenue over time using the cost-to-cost percentage-of-completion method. Service contracts that include multiple performance obligations are segmented between types of services. For contracts with multiple performance obligations, the Company allocates the transaction price to each performance obligation using an estimate of the stand-alone selling price of each distinct service in the contract. In some instances where the Company is standing ready to provide services, the Company recognizes revenue ratably over the service period. Under the typical payment terms of our service contracts, amounts are billed as work progresses in accordance with agreed-upon contractual terms, and customer payments are typically due within 30 to 60 days of billing, depending on the contract.
Direct costs of contracts include incentive-fee arrangements. These incentive fees can be based onall costs incurred in connection with and directly for the benefit of client contracts, including depreciation and amortization relating to assets used in providing the services required by the related projects. The level of direct costs of contracts may fluctuate between reporting periods due to a variety of factors, but the most common are the achievement of target completion dates, target costs, and/or other performance criteria. Failure to meet these targets can result in unrealized incentive fees. We recognize incentive fees based on expected results using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting. As the contract progresses and more information becomes available, the estimate of the anticipated incentive fee that will be earned is revised as necessary. We bill incentive fees based on the terms and conditions of the individual contracts. In certain situations, we are allowed to bill a portion of the incentive fees over the performance period of the contract. In other situations, we are allowed to bill incentive fees only after the target criterion has been achieved. Incentive fees which have been recognized but not billed are included in receivables in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Certain cost-reimbursable contracts with government customers as well as certain commercial clients provide that contract costs are subject to audit and adjustment. In this situation, revenues are recorded at the time services are performed based upon the amounts we expect to realize upon completion of the contracts. Revenues are not recognized for non-recoverable costs. In those situations where an audit indicates that we may have billed a client for costs not allowable under the terms of the contract, we estimateincluding the amount of such nonbillablepass-through costs and adjust our revenues accordingly.

Whenwe incur during a period. On those projects where we are directly responsibleacting as principal for subcontractorsubcontract labor or third-party materials and equipment, we reflect the costsamounts of such items in both revenues and costs (and we refer to such costs as “pass-through” costs)“pass-through costs”). On those projects where

Back charges to suppliers or subcontractors are recognized as a reduction of cost when it is determined that recovery of such cost is probable and the client electsamounts can be reliably estimated. Disputed back charges are recognized when the same requirements described above have been satisfied.
Variable Consideration
The nature of the Company’s contracts gives rise to payseveral types of variable consideration, including claims and unpriced change orders; awards and incentive fees; and liquidated damages and penalties. The Company recognizes revenue for such items directly and we have no associated responsibility for such items, these amounts are not reflected in either revenues or costs.

The following table sets forth pass-through costs included in revenuesvariable consideration when it is probable that a significant reversal in the accompanying Consolidated Statementsamount of Earnings (in millions):

cumulative revenue recognized will not occur. The Company estimates the amount of revenue to be recognized on variable consideration using the expected value (i.e., the sum of a probability-weighted amount) or the most likely amount method, whichever is expected to better predict the amount. Factors considered in determining whether revenue associated with claims (including change orders in dispute and unapproved change orders in regard to both scope and price) should be recognized include the following: (a) the contract or other evidence provides a legal basis for the claim, (b) additional costs were caused by circumstances that were unforeseen at the contract date and not the result of deficiencies in the company’s performance, (c) claim-related costs are identifiable and considered reasonable in view of the work performed, and (d) evidence supporting the claim is objective and verifiable. If the requirements for recognizing revenue for claims or unapproved change orders are met, revenue is recorded only when the costs associated with the claims or unapproved change orders have been incurred and only up to the amount of cost incurred.

For the Year Ended

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

$

2,539.3

 

 

$

2,489.9

 

 

$

2,602.6

 

The Company generally provides limited warranties for work performed under its engineering and construction contracts. The warranty periods typically extend for a limited duration following substantial completion of the Company’s work on the project. Historically, warranty claims have not resulted in material costs incurred for which the Company was not compensated for by the customer.

Practical Expedient
 If the Company has a right to consideration from a customer in an amount that corresponds directly with the value of the Company’s performance completed to date (a service contract in which the company bills a fixed amount for each hour of service provided), the Company recognizes revenue in the amount to which it has a right to invoice for services performed.
The Company does not adjust the contract price for the effects of a significant financing component if the Company expects, at contract inception, that the period between when the Company transfers a service to a customer and when the customer pays for that service will be one year or less.
    See Note 3- Revenue Accounting for Contracts for further discussion.
F-10

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Joint Ventures and VIEs
As is common to the industry, we execute certain contracts jointly with third parties through various forms of joint ventures and consortiums.ventures. Although the joint ventures own and hold the contracts with the clients, the services required by the contracts are typically performed by us and our joint venture partners, or by other subcontractors under subcontracting agreements with the joint ventures. Many of these joint ventures are formed for a specific project. The assets of our joint ventures therefore,generally consist almost entirely of cash and receivables (representing amounts due from clients), and the liabilities of our joint ventures generally consist almost entirely of amounts due to the joint venture partners (for services provided by the partners to the joint ventures under their individual subcontracts) and other subcontractors. In general, at any given time, the equity of our joint ventures represents the undistributed profits earned on contracts the joint ventures hold with clients. Very few of our joint ventures have employees. None of our joint ventures haveemployees or third-party debt or credit facilities. Under U.S. GAAP, our share of profits and losses associated with the contractsThe debt held by the joint ventures is reflected innon-recourse to the general credit of Jacobs.
The assets of a joint venture are restricted for use to the obligations of the particular joint venture and are not available for general operations of the Company. Our risk of loss on these arrangements is usually shared with our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Certainpartners. The liability of each partner is usually joint and several, which means that each partner may become liable for the entire risk of loss on the project. Furthermore, on some of our projects, the Company has granted guarantees which may encumber both our contracting subsidiary company and the Company for the entire risk of loss on the project. The Company is unable to estimate the maximum potential amount of future payments that we could be required to make under outstanding performance guarantees related to joint venture projects due to a number of factors, including but not limited to, the nature and extent of any contractual defaults by our joint venture partners, resource availability, potential performance delays caused by the defaults, the location of the projects, and the terms of the related contracts. See Note 18- Contractual Guarantees, Litigation, Investigations and Insurance for further discussion.

Most of the joint ventures meetare deemed to be variable interest entities (“VIE”) because they lack sufficient equity to finance the definitionactivities of the joint venture. The Company uses a qualitative approach to determine if the Company is the primary beneficiary of the VIE, which considers factors that indicate a party has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the joint venture’s economic performance. These factors include the composition of the governing board, how board decisions are approved, the powers granted to the operational manager(s) and partner that holds that position(s), and to a certain extent, the partner’s economic interest in the joint venture. The Company analyzes each joint venture initially to determine if it should be consolidated or unconsolidated.
Consolidated if the Company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. In evaluating our VIEs for possible consolidation, we performVIE, or holds the majority of voting interests of a qualitative analysisnon-VIE (and no significant participative rights are available to determine whether orthe other partners).
Unconsolidated if the Company is not we have a “controlling financial interest” in the VIE as defined by U.S. GAAP. We consolidate only those VIEs over which we have a controlling financial interest and are the primary beneficiary.

Forbeneficiary of a VIE, or does not hold the Company’smajority of voting interest of a non-VIE.

    Our unconsolidated joint ventures we use either the(including equity method of accountinginvestments) are reviewed for impairment whenever events or proportional consolidation.

There were no changes in factscircumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investment might not be recoverable, and circumstances during the periodimpairment losses are recognized for such investments if there is a decline in fair value below carrying value that caused the Companyis considered to reassess the method of accounting be other-than-temporary.

See Note 8- Joint Ventures and VIEs for its VIEs.

further discussion.

Fair Value Measurements

Certain amounts included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented at “fair value.” Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the date fair value is determined (the “measurement date”). When determining fair value, we consider the principal or most advantageous market in which we would transact, and we consider only those assumptions we believe a typical market participant would consider when pricing an asset or liability. In measuring fair value, we use the following inputs in the order of priority indicated:
Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 - Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, such as (i) quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; (ii) quoted prices in markets that have insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (e.g., less active markets); and (iii) model-driven valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated with, observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
F-11

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the fair value measurement.
The net carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and payables and notes payableshort-term debt approximate Fair Valuefair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. Similarly, we believeSee Note 9- Borrowings for a discussion of the carryingfair value of long-term debt also approximates Fair Value based on the interest rates and scheduled maturities applicable to the outstanding borrowings.

F-9


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

debt.

Certain other assets and liabilities, such as forward contracts and an interest rate swap agreementagreements we purchased as cash-flow hedges discussed in Note 11 — 17- Commitments and Contingencies and Derivative Financial Instrumentsand the Company's investment in Worley ordinary shares discussed in Note 15- Sale of Energy, Chemicals and Resources are required to be carried in our Consolidated Financial Statements at Fair Value.

The Fair Valuefair value of the Company’s reporting units (used for purposes of determining whether there is an indication of possible impairment of the carrying value of goodwill) is determined using both an income approach and a market approach. Both approaches require us to make certain estimates and judgments. Under the income approach, Fair Valuefair value is determined by using the discounted cash flows of our reporting units. Under the market approach, the Fair Valuesfair values of our reporting units are determined by reference to guideline companies that are reasonably comparable to our reporting units; the Fair Valuesfair values are estimated based on the valuation multiples of the invested capital associated with the guideline companies. In assessing whether there is an indication that the carrying value of goodwill has been impaired, we utilize the results of both valuation techniques and consider the range of Fair Valuesfair values indicated. The range of values (both ends of the range) for each reporting unit exceeded the respective book values by 27% to 110%.

With respect to equity-based compensation (i.e., share-based payments), we estimate the Fair Valuefair value of stock options granted to employees and directors using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Like all option-pricing models, the Black-Scholes model requires the use of subjective assumptions including (i) the expected volatility of the market price of the underlying stock, and (ii) the expected term of the award, among others. Accordingly, changes in assumptions and any subsequent adjustments to those assumptions can cause different Fair Valuesfair values to be assigned to our future stock option awards. For restricted stock unitsawards (including restricted stock units) containing market conditions, compensation expense is based on the fair value of such awards using a Monte Carlo simulation. For restricted stock awards (including restricted stock units) containing service market and performance conditions, compensation expense is based on the Fair Valueclosing stock price on the date of such units using a Monte Carlo simulation.

grant.

The Fair Valuesfair values of the assets owned by the various pension plans that the Company sponsors are determined based on the type of asset, consistent with U.S. GAAP. Equity securities are valued by using market observable data such as quoted prices. Publicly traded corporate equity securities are valued at the last reported sale price on the last business day of the year. Securities not traded on the last business day are valued at the last reported bid price. Debt securitiesFixed income investment funds categorized as Level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data (e.g., interest rates and yield curves observable at the last reported sale price on the last business day applicable.commonly quoted intervals), bids provided by brokers or dealers, or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics. Real estate consists primarily of common or collective trusts, with underlying investments in real estate. These investments are valued using the best information available, including quoted market price, market prices for similar assets when available, internal cash flow estimates discounted at an appropriate interest rate, or independent appraisals, as appropriate. Management values insurance contracts investments in infrastructure/raw goods, and hedge funds using actuarial assumptions and certain values reported by fund managers.

The methodologies described above and elsewhere in these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements may produce a Fair Valuefair value measure that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future Fair Values.fair values. Furthermore, while the Company believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the Fair Valuefair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different Fair Valuefair value measurement.

Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investments with original maturities of less than three months to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents at September 29, 2017October 2, 2020 and September 30, 201627, 2019 consisted primarily of money market mutual funds and overnight bank deposits.

Receivables, Contract Assets and Billings in Excess of Costs

Contract Liabilities

Receivables include amounts billed, receivables,net and unbilled receivables, and retentions receivable. Billed receivables representreceivables. Amounts billed, net consist of amounts invoiced to clients in accordance with the terms of our client contracts. Theycontracts and are recorded in our financial statements when they are issued. shown net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. We anticipate that substantially all of such billed amounts will be collected over the next twelve months.
F-12

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Unbilled receivables and retentions receivableother, which represent reimbursable costs and amounts earned and reimbursable under contracts in progress as of the respective balance sheet dates. Such amounts become billable accordingan unconditional right to the contract terms, which usually considerpayment subject only to the passage of time in connection with our client contracts, are reclassified to amounts billed when they are billed under the terms of the contract. Prior to adoption of ASC 606, receivables related to contractual milestones or achievement of certain milestones or completion of the project.performance-based targets were included in unbilled receivables. These are now included in contract assets. We anticipate that substantially all of such unbilled amounts will be billed and collected over the next fiscal year.

F-10


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Certain contracts allow ustwelve months.

Contract assets represent unbilled amounts where the right to issue invoicespayment is subject to more than merely the passage of time and includes performance-based incentives and services provided ahead of agreed contractual milestones. Contract assets are transferred to unbilled receivables when the right to consideration becomes unconditional and are transferred to amounts billed upon invoicing.
Contract liabilities represent amounts billed to clients in advance of providing services. Billings in excess of costs represent billingsrevenue recognized to and cash collected from, clients in advance of work performed.date. We anticipate that substantially all such amounts will be earned over the next twelve months.

In order to manage short-term liquidity and credit exposure, Jacobs may sell current customer receivables to third parties. When Jacobs sells customer receivables to third parties it accelerates the receipt of cash that would otherwise have been collected from customers and records these transactions as reductions to the receivable amounts. Jacobs does not maintain continuing involvement in these arrangements.
Property, Equipment, and Improvements

Property, equipment and improvements are carried at cost, and are shown net of accumulated depreciation and amortization in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Depreciation and amortization is computed primarily by using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The cost of leasehold improvements is amortized using the straight-line method over the lesser of the estimated useful life of the asset or the remaining term of the related lease. Estimated useful lives range from 20 to 40 years for buildings, from 3 to 10 years for equipment and from 4 to 10 years for leasehold improvements.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired business over the Fair Valuefair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired. Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized; instead, on an annual basis as of the end of the third quarter of each fiscal year we test goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives for possible impairment. Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful lives of those assets.
Interim testing for impairment is performed if indicators of potential impairment exist. For purposes of impairment testing, goodwill is assigned to the applicable reporting units based on the current reporting structure.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2016, we reorganized our operations around four global lines of business, which also serve as our operating segments: Petroleum & Chemicals, Buildings & Infrastructure, Aerospace & Technology, and Industrial. We determined that this new organization would better support the needs of managing each unique set of customers that fall within each segment.  As a result of the new organization, we subsequently realigned our internal reporting structures to enable our Chief Executive Officer, who is also our Chief Operating Decision Maker, to evaluate the performance of each of these segments and make appropriate resource allocations among each of the segments. For purposes of our goodwill impairment testing, we have determined that our operating segments are also our reporting units based on management’s conclusion that the components comprising each of our operating segments share similar economic characteristics and meet the aggregation criteria in accordance with ASC 350.

When testing goodwill for impairment quantitatively, the Company first compares the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, a second step is performed to measure the amount of potential impairment. In the second step, the Company compared the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill. If the carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized. During 2017,2020, we completed our annual goodwill impairment test and quantitatively determined that none of theour goodwill was impaired.  The Company recorded $119.3 million of goodwill during 2017 in conjunction with the acquisitions of Aquenta Consulting Pty Ltd. and Blue Canopy LLC. Goodwill for each of the Company's segments is presented in Note 15.

 We have determined that the fair value of our reporting units substantially exceeded their respective carrying values for the Consolidated Balance Sheets presented.

The following table presents the components

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Our long-lived assets other than goodwill principally consist of right-of-use lease assets, property, equipment and improvements, and finite-lived intangible assets. These long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment for each of our goodwillasset groups in accordance with ASC 360 by reporting unit appearing infirst identifying whether indicators of impairment exist. If such indicators are present, we assess long-lived asset groups for recoverability based on estimated future undiscounted cash flows. For asset groups where the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 29, 2017 (in thousands):

recoverability test fails, the fair value of each asset group is then estimated and compared to its carrying amount. An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which an asset group’s carrying value exceeds its fair value.

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

Aerospace & Technology

 

$

1,025,780

 

Buildings & Infrastructure

 

 

751,407

 

Industrial

 

 

561,785

 

Petroleum & Chemicals

 

 

670,854

 

Total Goodwill

 

$

3,009,826

 

F-13

F-11


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

During the preparation of the Form 10-Q for the first fiscal quarter of 2017, the Company determined that its prior financial statements contained immaterial misstatements related to incorrect translation of the Company’s non-U.S. goodwill balances from local currency to the U.S. Dollar reporting currency. It was determined that the Company had incorrectly used historical translation rates for the U.S. Dollar in place at the time of the Company’s recording of its foreign goodwill balances rather than using current translation rates at each balance sheet date in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The error dated back to the time of our initial reporting of non-US goodwill balances in the late 1990s and affected our historical quarterly and annual reporting periods through the first fiscal quarter of 2017.

As a result, goodwill and accumulated other comprehensive income in the Company’s September 30, 2016 consolidated balance sheet (which have not been adjusted) were each overstated by $209.9 million and were corrected in the first fiscal quarter of 2017 foreign currency translation adjustment. Consequently, the correction was a direct component of the overall translation adjustment amount of $140.5 million that was reported for fiscal 2017. These adjustments had no impact on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Earnings or Cash Flows. Also, other comprehensive income for the year ended September 30, 2016 was overstated by $33.8 million as a result of these misstatements.

The following table provides certain information related to the Company’s acquired intangible assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015 (in thousands):

 

 

Customer

Relationships,

Contracts, and

Backlog

 

 

Developed

Technology

 

 

Trade

Names

 

 

Patents

 

 

Other

 

 

Total

 

Balances, September 26, 2014

 

$

408,041

 

 

$

17,378

 

 

$

14,148

 

 

$

 

 

$

625

 

 

$

440,192

 

Acquisitions

 

 

(4,315

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1,292

)

 

 

 

 

 

300

 

 

 

(5,307

)

Amortization

 

 

(39,967

)

 

 

(1,533

)

 

 

(4,172

)

 

 

 

 

 

(277

)

 

 

(45,949

)

Foreign currency translation

 

 

(34,418

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1,085

)

 

 

 

 

 

(14

)

 

 

(35,517

)

Balances, October 2, 2015

 

 

329,341

 

 

 

15,845

 

 

 

7,599

 

 

 

 

 

 

634

 

 

 

353,419

 

Acquisitions

 

 

7,286

 

 

 

 

 

 

859

 

 

 

10,027

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,172

 

Amortization

 

 

(38,595

)

 

 

(1,534

)

 

 

(3,819

)

 

 

 

 

 

(454

)

 

 

(44,402

)

Foreign currency translation

 

 

9,605

 

 

 

 

 

 

147

 

 

 

 

 

 

(19

)

 

 

9,733

 

Balances, September 30, 2016

 

 

307,637

 

 

 

14,311

 

 

 

4,786

 

 

 

10,027

 

 

 

161

 

 

 

336,922

 

Acquisitions

 

 

29,803

 

 

 

1,685

 

 

 

4,417

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,905

 

Amortization

 

 

(39,679

)

 

 

(1,534

)

 

 

(2,549

)

 

 

(400

)

 

 

(50

)

 

 

(44,212

)

Foreign currency translation

 

 

3,707

 

 

 

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

553

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,305

 

Balances, September 29, 2017

 

$

301,468

 

 

 

14,462

 

 

 

6,699

 

 

 

10,180

 

 

 

111

 

 

 

332,920

 

Weighted Average Amortization Period (years)

 

7.9

 

 

7.7

 

 

4.4

 

 

24

 

 

2.2

 

 

8.3

 

The weighted average amortization period includes the effects of foreign currency translation.

The above table excludes the values assigned to those intangible assets embedded in the Company’s equity method investment in AWE Management Ltd. (“AWE”) and Guimar Engenharia LTDA ("Guimar"). Those amounts are included in the carrying value of the Company’s investment in AWE and Guimar. The amount of amortization expense we estimate we will record during each of the next five fiscal years relating to intangible assets existing at September 29, 2017, including those associated with AWE and Guimar, is: fiscal 2018STATEMENTS - $49.7 million; fiscal 2019 - $48.3 million; fiscal 2020 - $46.1 million; fiscal 2021 - $40.9 million; and fiscal 2022 - $39.5 million.

(Continued)


Foreign Currencies

In preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements, it is necessary to translate the financial statements of our subsidiaries operating outside the U.S., which are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, into the U.S. dollar. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, revenues and expenses of operations outside the U.S. are translated into U.S. dollars using weighted-average exchange rates for the applicable periods being translated while the assets and liabilities of operations outside the U.S. are generally translated into U.S. dollars using period-end exchange rates. The net effect of foreign currency

F-12


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

translation adjustments is included in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Share-Based Payments

We measure the value of services received from employees and directors in exchange for an award of an equity instrument based on the grant-date Fair Valuefair value of the award. The computed value is recognized as a non-cash cost on a straight-line basis over the period the individual provides services, which is typically the vesting period of the award with the exception of awards containing an internal performance measure, such as Earnings Per Share growth and Return on Invested Capital, which is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period subject to the probability of meeting the performance requirements and adjusted for the number of shares expected to be earned. The cost of these awards is recorded in selling, general and administrative expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

The following table presents our stock-based compensation expense for the various types of awards made by the Company as included in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015 (in thousands):

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

Award Type

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units (excluding

   Market and Performance Awards)

 

$

26,393

 

 

$

21,156

 

 

$

20,779

 

Stock Options

 

 

4,338

 

 

 

7,165

 

 

 

10,683

 

Market and Performance Awards

 

 

8,033

 

 

 

4,049

 

 

 

9,950

 

Total Expense

 

$

38,764

 

 

$

32,370

 

 

$

41,412

 

The Company has two incentive plans whereby eligible employees and directors of Jacobs may be granted stock options, restricted stock, and/or restricted stock units.

Stock Options —Substantially all of the stock options granted during the previous years were awarded on the same date for all employees and directors (although the date is different for employees and directors). For fiscal year 2017, there were no stock options granted to either employees or directors.  The following table presents the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for awards made to employees and directors for the years ended September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015:

 

 

Awards Made to Employees

 

 

Awards Made to Directors

 

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Dividend yield

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

Expected volatility

 

 

27.77

%

 

 

27.00

%

 

 

29.21

%

 

 

29.28

%

Risk-free interest rate

 

 

1.82

%

 

 

1.67

%

 

 

1.44

%

 

 

1.63

%

Expected term of options (in years)

 

5.82

 

 

 

5.82

 

 

5.82

 

 

 

5.82

 

Market and Performance Awards — The Company granted restricted stock units containing service, performance, and market conditions (“PSUs”).  PSUs are earned over a three-year performance period if the specified performance metrics are met.   During fiscal 2015, the Company only granted PSUs based on net earnings growth (“Net Earnings Growth Based PSUs”).  For fiscal 2016, half of the PSUs granted were based on relative total stockholder return (“Relative TSR Based PSUs”) and the other half of the PSUs were based on earnings per share (“EPS Based PSUs”).  For fiscal 2017, half of the PSUs granted were EPS Based PSUs and the other half were based on return on invested capital (“ROIC Based PSUs”).

2014 and 2015 Awards

The number of Net Earnings Growth Based PSUs awarded in fiscal years 2014 and 2015  which may ultimately vest is equal to the sum of the following: (1) an amount, not less than zero, equal to one-third of the target Net Earnings Growth Based PSUs multiplied by the Net Earnings Growth Performance Multiplier (or, "NEGPM", as shown in the table below)

F-13


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

determined based upon the growth in the Company's Adjusted Net Earnings (as defined in the applicable award agreements under the Stock Incentive Plan) over the period starting on the first day of the Company's third quarter of fiscal 2014 (in the case of Net Earnings Growth Based PSUs issued in fiscal 2014), or fiscal 2015 (in the case of Net Earnings Growth Based PSUs issued in fiscal 2015) and ending on the last day of the Company's second quarter of fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2016, respectively; plus, (2) an amount, not less than zero, equal to (A) two-thirds of the target Net Earnings Growth Based PSUs multiplied by the NEGPM determined based upon the average growth in the Company's Adjusted Net Earnings over the period starting on the first day of the Company's third quarter of fiscal 2014 (in the case of Net Earnings Growth Based PSUs issued in fiscal 2014), or fiscal 2015 (in the case of Net Earnings Growth Based PSUs issued in fiscal 2015) and ending on the last day of the Company's second quarter of fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2017, respectively, minus (B) the amount determined pursuant to (1) above; plus, (3) an amount, not less than zero, equal to (A) the target Net Earnings Growth Based PSUs multiplied by the NEGPM determined based upon the average growth in the Company's Adjusted Net Earnings over the period starting on the first day of the Company's third quarter of fiscal

2014 (in the case of Net Earnings Growth Based PSUs issued in fiscal 2014), or fiscal 2015 (in the case of Net Earnings Growth Based PSUs issued in fiscal 2015) and ending on the last day of the Company's second quarter of fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2018, respectively, minus (B) the amount determined pursuant to (1) and (2) above.

If the Company's average growth in Adjusted Net Earnings over the applicable fiscal years during the respective performance periods is between 5% and 10%, 10% and 15%, or 15% and 20%, the Net Earnings Growth Performance Multiplier will be determined using straight line interpolation based on the actual average growth in the Company's Adjusted Net Earnings.

The following table presents the basis on which the Net Earnings Growth Based PSUs are determined:

Average Adjusted Net

Earnings Growth

 

 

Net Earnings Growth Performance

Multiplier

 

Less than 5%

 

 

 

0

%

 

5%

 

 

 

50

%

 

10%

 

 

 

100

%

 

15%

 

 

 

150

%

 

20%

 

 

 

200

%

Unless stated otherwise, the Net Earnings Growth Based PSUs are valued based on the closing price of the Company's common stock as reported in the NYSE Composite Price History on their respective grant dates.

2016 Awards

EPS Based PSUs

For the EPS Based PSUs issued in fiscal 2016, the number of restricted stock units to be issued on the vesting date of November 19, 2018 is based on the Company’s adjusted EPS growth over fiscal 2016, 2017 and 2018. The number of restricted stock units to be issued equals the sum of: (i) an amount, not less than zero, equal to one-third of the target number of restricted stock units multiplied by an EPS Performance Multiplier (as defined below) for that period determined based upon the growth in the Company’s adjusted EPS (“EPS Growth Rate”) from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2016; (ii) an amount, not less than zero, equal to two-thirds of the target number of restricted stock units multiplied by an EPS Performance Multiplier determined based upon the Compound Annual EPS Growth Rate (as defined below) for fiscal 2017 as compared to fiscal 2015, minus the amount of shares earned pursuant to clause (i); and (iii) an amount, not less than zero, equal to the target number of restricted stock units multiplied by an EPS Performance Multiplier determined based upon the Compound Annual EPS Growth Rate for fiscal 2018 as compared to fiscal 2015, minus the amount of shares earned pursuant to clauses (i) and (ii).

The “Compound Annual EPS Growth Rate” for purposes of clauses (ii) and (iii) above means the growth rate, which when multiplied two times fiscal 2015 adjusted EPS (in the case of clause (ii)) or three times fiscal 2015 adjusted EPS (in the case of clause (iii)) results in a number equal to actual fiscal 2017 adjusted EPS and fiscal 2018 adjusted EPS, respectively.

F-14


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The “EPS Performance Multiplier” is determined by reference to the following table based upon the Company’s EPS Growth Rate or Compound Annual EPS Growth Rate over the relevant fiscal periods. The Human Resource and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company set these metrics based on the Company’s plan at the start of the fiscal year.

EPS Growth Rate or Compound Annual EPS Growth Rate

 

 

EPS Performance Multiplier

 

Less than 4%

 

 

 

0

%

 

4%

 

 

 

50

%

 

7.5%

 

 

 

100

%

 

15%

 

 

 

150

%

 

  20% or greater

 

 

 

200

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If the EPS Growth Rate or Compound Annual EPS Growth Rate falls between 4% and 7.5%, 7.5% and 15%, or 15% and 20%, the EPS Performance Multiplier is determined using linear interpolation based on the actual growth in adjusted EPS.

Unless stated otherwise, the EPS Based PSUs are valued based on the closing price of the Company's common stock as reported in the NYSE Composite Price History on their respective grant dates.

Relative TSR Based PSUs

The number of Relative TSR Based PSUs which may ultimately vest is equal to the target Relative TSR Based PSUs multiplied by the TSR Performance Multiplier. The TSR Performance Multiplier is determined by comparing the Company's total stockholder return to the total stockholder return of each of the companies in a specified industry peer group over the three year period immediately following the award date. For purposes of computing total stockholder return, the beginning stock price is the average closing stock price over the 30 calendar day period ending on the award date ("Performance Period"), and the ending stock price is the average closing price over the 30 calendar day period ending on the last day of the Performance Period. Any dividend payments made over the Performance Period are deemed re-invested on the ex-dividend date in additional shares of the applicable company.

The following table presents the basis on which the Relative TSR Based PSUs are determined:

Company TSR Percentile Rank

TSR Performance

Multiplier

Below 30th percentile

0

%

30th percentile

50

%

50th percentile

100

%

70th percentile or above

150

%

If the Company's total stockholder return over the Performance Period falls between any of the brackets described above, the TSR Performance Multiplier will be determined using straight line interpolation based on the actual percentile ranking.

F-15


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Substantially all of the TSR Based PSUs awarded during fiscal year 2016 were awarded on the same date.  For fiscal year 2017 and 2015, no TSR Based PSUs were awarded.  The following table presents the assumptions used to value the TSR Based PSUs for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015:

For the Years Ended

September 29, 2017

September 30, 2016

October 2, 2015

Dividend yield

%

%

%

Expected volatility

%

25.06

%

%

Risk-free interest rate

%

1.21

%

%

Expected term (in years)

3

2017 Awards

For the EPS Based PSUs issued in fiscal 2017, the number of restricted stock units to be issued on the vesting date of November 16, 2019 is based on the Company’s adjusted EPS growth over fiscal 2017, 2018 and 2019. The number of restricted stock units to be issued equals the sum of: (i) an amount, not less than zero, equal to one-third of the target number of restricted stock units multiplied by an EPS Performance Multiplier (as shown in the table below) for that period determined based upon the growth in the Company’s adjusted EPS (“EPS Growth Rate”) from fiscal 2016 to fiscal 2017; (ii) an amount, not less than zero, equal to two-thirds of the target number of restricted stock units multiplied by an EPS Performance Multiplier determined based upon the average EPS Growth Rate in fiscal years 2017 and 2018 as compared to fiscal 2016, minus the amount of shares earned pursuant to clause (i); and (iii) an amount, not less than zero, equal to the target number of restricted stock units multiplied by an EPS Performance Multiplier determined based upon the average EPS Growth Rate in fiscal years 2017, 2018 and 2019 as compared to fiscal 2016, minus the amount of shares earned pursuant to clauses (i) and (ii).

The “EPS Performance Multiplier” is determined by reference to the following table based upon the average growth in the Company’s adjusted EPS over the indicated fiscal periods. The Human Resource and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company set these metrics based on the Company’s plan at the start of the fiscal year.

Average EPS Growth Rate from fiscal 2016 to fiscal 2017

Average EPS Growth Rate

 

 

EPS Performance Multiplier

 

Less than 0%

 

 

 

0

 

 

2.3%

 

 

 

100

%

 

4.3%

 

 

 

200

%

Average EPS Growth Rate from fiscal 2016 to fiscal 2018

Average EPS Growth Rate

 

 

EPS Performance Multiplier

 

Less than 2.1%

 

 

 

0

 

 

4.1%

 

 

 

100

%

6.1%

 

 

 

200

%

Average EPS Growth Rate from fiscal 2016 to fiscal 2019

Average EPS Growth Rate

 

 

EPS Performance Multiplier

 

Less than 3.6%

 

 

 

0

 

 

5.6%

 

 

 

100

%

7.6%

 

 

 

200

%

F-16


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

If the average EPS Growth Rate falls between the percentages referenced in the tables above, the EPS Performance Multiplier will be determined using linear interpolation based on the actual average EPS Growth Rate.

Unless stated otherwise, the EPS Based PSUs are valued based on the closing price of the Company's common stock as reported in the NYSE Composite Price History on their respective grant dates.

For the ROIC Based PSUs issued in fiscal 2017, the number of restricted stock units to be issued on the vesting date of November 16, 2019 is based on the Company’s average annual return on invested capital (“ROIC”) from fiscal 2017 to fiscal 2019.  The number of restricted stock units to be issued equals the target number of restricted stock units multiplied by an ROIC Performance Multiplier (as shown in the table below) determined based upon the Company’s average annual ROIC from fiscal 2017 to fiscal 2019.

Average ROIC – Fiscal 2017 - 2019

 

 

ROIC Performance Multiplier

 

Less than 8.9%

 

 

 

0

%

 

8.9%

 

 

 

50

%

 

9.9%

 

 

 

100

%

 

10.9%

 

 

 

200

%

If the average annual ROIC falls between 8.9% and 9.9% and 10.9%, the ROIC Performance Multiplier will be determined using linear interpolation based on the actual average ROIC.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Our cash balances and cash equivalents are maintained in accounts held by major banks and financial institutions located in North America, South America, Europe, the Middle East, India, Australia, Africa and Asia. In the normal course of business, and consistent with industry practices, we grant credit to our clients without requiring collateral. Concentrations of credit risk is the risk that, if we extend a significant amount of credit to clients in a specific geographic area or industry, we may experience disproportionately high levels of default if those clients are adversely affected by factors particular to their geographic area or industry. Concentrations of credit risk relative to trade receivables are limited due to our diverse client base, which includes the U.S. federal government and multi-national corporations operating in a broad range of industries and geographic areas. Additionally, in order to mitigate credit risk, we continually evaluate the credit worthiness of our major commercial clients.

Use of Estimates

Leases
On September 28, 2019 the Company adopted ASU 2016-02, Leases ("ASC 842"), along with ASU 2018-01, ASU 2018-10, ASU 2018-11, ASU 2018-20 and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAPASU 2019-01, which amended and clarified the related guidance. ASC 842 requires uslessees to employ estimates and make assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certainrecognize assets and liabilities;liabilities for most leases. The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at contract inception. A lease exists when a contract conveys to the revenuescustomer the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. The definition of a lease embodies two conditions: (1) there is an identified asset in the contract, and expenses reported(2) the customer has the right to control the use of the identified asset. Lessees are required to classify leases as either finance or operating leases. This classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.

ASC 842 provided several optional practical expedients for use in transition to and ongoing application of ASC 842. The Company elected to utilize the package of practical expedients in ASC 842-10-65-1(f) that, upon adoption of ASC 842, allows entities to (1) not reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (2) retain the classification of leases (e.g., operating or finance lease) existing as of the date of adoption and (3) not reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases. The Company did not elect the practical expedient pertaining to the use of hindsight. The Company elected to utilize the practical expedient in ASC 842-10-15-37 in which the Company has chosen to account for each separate lease component of a contract and its associated non-lease components as a single lease component.
The Company adopted ASC 842 using the modified retrospective method, and accordingly, the new guidance was applied to leases that existed as of September 28, 2019 (the date of initial application) without adjusting the comparative periods presented. As a result, as of September 28, 2019, the Company has recorded total right-of-use ("ROU") assets of $767.0 million, which is comprised of approximately $82.3 million in reclassifications of previously recorded lease incentives and deferred rent, offset by $141.4 million in restructured lease cease-use liability.
F-14

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Additionally, the Company has recorded total current lease liabilities of $180.7 million, and total noncurrent lease liabilities of $810.1 million. The adoption of ASC 842 did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or any impact on the Company’s cash flows.
The Company’s right-of use assets and lease liabilities relate to real estate, project assets used in connection with long-term construction contracts, IT assets and vehicles. The Company’s leases have remaining lease terms of one year to thirteen years. The Company’s lease obligations are primarily for the periods covered byuse of office space and are primarily operating leases. Certain of the financial statements;Company’s leases contain renewal, extension, or termination options. The Company assesses each option on an individual basis and will only include options reasonably certain amounts disclosedof exercise in these Notesthe lease term. The Company generally considers the base term to be the Consolidated Financial Statements. Althoughterm provided in the contract. None of the Company’s lease agreements contain material options to purchase the leased property, material residual value guarantees, or material restrictions or covenants.
Long-term project asset and vehicle leases (leases with terms greater than twelve months), along with all real estate and IT asset leases, are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at the present value of the minimum lease payments not yet paid. Because the Company primarily acts as a lessee and the rates implicit in its leases are not readily determinable, the Company generally uses its incremental borrowing rate on the lease commencement date to calculate the present value of future lease payments. Certain leases include payments that are based solely on an index or rate. These variable lease payments are included in the calculation of the ROU asset and lease liability and are initially measured using the index or rate at the lease commencement date. Other variable lease payments, such estimatesas payments based on use and assumptionsfor property taxes, insurance, or common area maintenance that are based on management’s most recent assessmentactual assessments are excluded from the ROU asset and lease liability and are expensed as incurred. In addition to the present value of the underlying factsfuture lease payments, the calculation of the ROU asset also includes any deferred rent, lease pre-payments and circumstances utilizinginitial direct costs of obtaining the most current information availablelease, such as commissions.
Certain lease contracts contain nonlease components such as maintenance and past experience, actual results could differ significantly from those estimatesutilities. The Company has made an accounting policy election, as allowed under ASC 842-10-15-37 and assumptions. Our estimates, judgments,discussed above, to capitalize both the lease component and assumptionsnonlease components of its contracts as a single lease component for all of its right-of-use assets.
Short-term project asset and vehicle leases (project asset and vehicle leases with an initial term of twelve months or less or leases that are evaluated periodicallycancellable by the lessee and adjusted accordingly.

Earlier in these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements we discussed threelessor without significant accounting policies that relypenalties) are not recorded on the applicationconsolidated balance sheet and are expensed on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The majority of estimatesthe Company’s short-term leases relate to equipment used on construction projects. These leases are entered into at agreed upon hourly, daily, weekly or monthly rental rates for an unspecified duration and assumptions: revenue recognitiontypically have a termination for long-term construction contracts;convenience provision. Such equipment leases are considered short-term in nature unless it is reasonably certain that the processequipment will be leased for testing goodwill for possible impairment; and the accounting for share-based payments to employees and directors. The following is a discussion of certain other significant accounting policies that rely on the use of estimates:

Accounting for term greater than twelve months.

Pensions
We use certain assumptions and estimates in order to calculate periodic pension cost and the value of the assets and liabilities of our pension plans. These assumptions involve discount rates, investment returns and projected salary increases, among others. Changes in the actuarial assumptions may have a material effect on the plans’ liabilities and the projected pension expense.

F-17

We use a corridor approach to amortize actuarial gains and losses. Under this approach, net gains or losses in excess of ten percent of the larger of the pension benefit obligation or the market-related value of the assets are amortized on a straight-line basis. The period of amortization is the average remaining service of active participants who are expected to receive benefits under certain plans and the average remaining future lifetime of plan participants for certain plans.
We measure our defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the end of the month closest to their fiscal year end, which is September 30, 2020 as the alternative measurement date in accordance with FASB guidance ASU 2015-04, Compensation Retirement Benefit (Topic 715): Practical Expedient for the Measurement Date of an Employer’s Defined Benefit Obligation and Plan Asset. This guidance allows employers with fiscal year ends that do not coincide with a calendar month end to make an accounting policy election to measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the end of the month closest to their fiscal year end.
F-15

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Accounting for

Income Taxes
We determine our consolidated income tax expense using the asset and liability method prescribed by U.S.GAAP. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and income tax purposes. Such deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted, as appropriate, to reflect changes in tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. If and when we determine that a deferred tax asset will not be realized for its full amount, we will recognize and record avaluation allowance with a corresponding charge to earnings. Judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. In the normal course of business, we may engage in numerous transactions every day for which the ultimate tax outcome (including(including the period in which the transaction will ultimately be included in taxable income or deducted as an expense) is uncertain. Additionally, we file income, franchise, gross receipts and similar tax returns in many jurisdictions. Our tax returns are subject to audit and investigation by the Internal Revenue Service, most states in the U.S., and by various government agencies representing many jurisdictions outside the U.S.

Contractual Guarantees, Litigation, Investigations and Insurance
In the normal course of business we are subject to certain contractual guarantees and litigation. We record in the Consolidated Balance Sheets amounts representing our estimated liability relating to such guarantees, litigation and insurance claims. Guarantees are accounted for in accordance with ASC 460-10, Guarantees, at fair value at the inception of the guarantee. We perform an analysis to determine the level of reserves to establish for both insurance-related claims that are known and have been asserted against us as well as for insurance-related claims that are believed to have been incurred based on actuarial analysis, but have not yet been reported to our claims administrators as of the respective balance sheet dates. We include any adjustments to such insurance reserves in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings. In addition, as a contractor providing services to various agencies of the U.S. federal government, we are subject to many levels of audits, investigations, and claims by, or on behalf of, the U.S. federal government with respect to contract performance, pricing, costs, cost allocations and procurement practices. We adjust revenues based upon the amounts we expect to realize considering the effects of any client audits or governmental investigations.

Accounting for

Business Combinations
U.S. GAAP requires that the purchase price paid for business combinations accounted for using the acquisition method be allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired based on their respective Fair Values. Determining the Fair Value of contract assets and liabilities acquired often requires estimates and judgments regarding, among other things, the estimated cost to complete such contracts. The Company must also make certain estimates and judgments relating to other assets and liabilities acquired as well as any identifiable intangible assets acquired.

During the fourth fiscal quarter

Use of 2017, the Company acquired Blue Canopy LLC.  During the second fiscal quarter of 2017, the Company acquired Aquenta Consulting Pty Ltd.  During the first fiscal quarter of 2016, the Company acquired J.L. Patterson & Associates.  These acquisitions were not material to the Company’s consolidated results for  fiscal 2017 or 2016.

On May 19, 2017, the Company entered into an agreement with Saudi Aramco to form a 50/50 Saudi Arabia-based joint venture company to provide professional programEstimates and construction management (“PMCM”) services for social infrastructure projects throughout Saudi Arabia and across the Middle East and North Africa.  Assumptions

The venture commenced start-up operations in fourth quarter fiscal 2017.  Initial funding commitments from each of the partners include $6.5 million in capital contributions and $7.0 million in partner loans which are expected to be executed during fiscal 2018.  The partners have also committed up to an additional $7.0 million each for future loans to the joint venture.

New Accounting Pronouncements

Revenue Recognition

From time to time, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issues accounting standards updates (each being an “ASU”) to its Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), which constitutes the primary source of U.S. GAAP.  The Company regularly monitors ASUs as they are issued and considers their applicability to its business.  All ASUs applicable to the Company are adopted by the due date and in the manner prescribed by the FASB.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09— Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The new guidance provided by ASU 2014-09 is intended to remove inconsistencies and perceived weaknesses in the existing revenue requirements, provide a more robust framework for addressing revenue issues, improve comparability, provide more useful information and simplify the preparation of financial statements.  statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to employ estimates and make assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities; the revenues and expenses reported for the periods covered by the financial statements; and certain amounts disclosed in these Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Although such estimates and assumptions are based on management’s most recent assessment of the underlying facts and circumstances utilizing the most current information available and past experience, actual results could differ significantly from those estimates and assumptions. Our estimates, judgments and assumptions are evaluated periodically and adjusted accordingly.

New Accounting Pronouncements
ASU 2014-09 was initially2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, is effective for annual and interim reporting periodsfiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. On July 9, 2015,2019 with early adoption permitted. ASU 2017-04 removes the FASB approvedsecond step of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a one-year deferralhypothetical purchase price allocation. An entity will now recognize a goodwill impairment charge for the amount by which a reporting unit's carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the amount of goodwill allocated to the

F-18

reporting unit. Management does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-04 to have any impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
F-16

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS - (Continued)

effective date

ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments requires entities to use a current lifetime expected credit loss methodology to measure impairments of certain financial assets. Using this standard.  The revised effective date formethodology will result in earlier recognition of losses than under the current incurred loss approach, which requires waiting to recognize a loss until it is probable of having been incurred. There are other provisions within the standard isthat affect how impairments of other financial assets may be recorded and presented, and that expand disclosures. This standard will be effective for our interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017with the first quarter of fiscal 2021, and interim periods therein.  The FASB also approved changes allowing for earlymust be applied on a modified retrospective basis. Management does not expect the adoption of the standard as of the original effective date.

The Company’s adoption activities will be performed over three phases: (i) assessment, (ii) design, and (iii) implementation.  Our assessment phase is predominantly complete. The following are the potential significant differences identified during the assessment phase:

Performance Obligations

Under current U.S. GAAP the Company typically considers engineering and construction services as separate performance obligations.  Under ASU 2014-09, the Company has determined that, in most instances, it is likely that engineering and construction services will be required326 to be combined intohave a single performance obligation.  In these instances, this will likely change the timing and pattern of revenue recognition.

Contract Modifications

In many instances, the Company enters into contracts for construction services subsequent to entering in to engineering services contracts.  Under ASU 2014-09, the construction services contract may be deemed to modify the engineering contract, or may be required to be combined with the engineering contract.  This modification or combination of contracts may result in a cumulative catch-up adjustment, which will have an immediatematerial impact on the Company’sCompany's financial position, results of operations in the period the contract combination or modification occurs. In addition, it will change the timing and pattern of revenue recognition after the period the contracts have been combined or modified.

The Company currently intends to adopt the new standard using the Modified Retrospective application.  This standard could have a significant impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and an administrative impact on its operations and will depend on the magnitude of the items discussed above. The Company will continue to evaluate the impact through the design and implementation phases.

Lease Accounting

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02—Leases. ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities for most leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for public entity financial statements for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods.  Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period.  The guidance must be adopted using a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements.  The Company is evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.  This standard could have a significant administrative impact on its operations, and the Company will further assess the impact through its implementation program.

Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09—Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows.  ASU 2016-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods.  The Company is evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements and plans to adopt in fiscal 2018.

3. Employee Stock Purchase and Stock Option Plans

Broad-Based, Employee Stock Purchase Plans

Under the 1989 ESPP and the GESPP, eligible employees who elect to participate in these plans are granted the right to purchase shares of the common stock of Jacobs at a discount that is limited to 5% of the per-share market value on the day

F-19

F-17

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS - (Continued)

shares

3.     Revenue Accounting for Contracts
Disaggregation of Revenues
Our revenues are soldprincipally derived from contracts to employees. provide a diverse range of technical, professional, and construction services to a large number of industrial, commercial, and governmental clients. We provide a broad range of engineering, design, and architectural services; construction and construction management services; operations and maintenance services; and process, scientific, and systems consulting services. We provide our services through offices and subsidiaries located primarily in North America, South America, Europe, the Middle East, India, Australia, Africa, and Asia. We provide our services under cost-reimbursable and fixed-price contracts. Our contracts are with many different customers in numerous industries. Refer to Note 19- Segment Information for additional information on how we disaggregate our revenues by reportable segment.
The following table summarizes the stock issuance activity under the 1989 ESPP and the GESPPfurther disaggregates our revenue by geographic area for the fiscal years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015:

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Aggregate Purchase Price Paid for Shares

   Sold:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Under the 1989 ESPP

 

$

21,084,657

 

 

$

23,631,241

 

 

$

28,621,800

 

Under the GESPP

 

 

2,105,834

 

 

 

2,660,067

 

 

 

3,535,479

 

Total

 

$

23,190,491

 

 

$

26,291,308

 

 

$

32,157,279

 

Aggregate Number of Shares Sold:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Under the 1989 ESPP

 

 

403,652

 

 

 

564,461

 

 

 

696,853

 

Under the GESPP

 

 

39,648

 

 

 

63,196

 

 

 

84,361

 

Total

 

 

443,300

 

 

 

627,657

 

 

 

781,214

 

On January 19, 2017, the Company’s stockholders approved an increase in the number of shares authorized by 4,350,000 shares for the 1989 ESPP2020, September 27, 2019 and by 150,000 shares for the GESPP.

At September 29, 2017, there remains 4,545,854 shares reserved for issuance under the 1989 ESPP and 174,980 shares reserved for issuance under the GESPP.

Stock Incentive Plans

We also sponsor the 1999 SIP and the 1999 ODSP. The 1999 SIP provides for the issuance of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, share appreciation rights ("SARs"), restricted stock, and restricted stock units to employees. The 1999 ODSP provides for awards of shares of common stock, restricted stock, and restricted stock units, and grants of nonqualified stock options to our outside (i.e., nonemployee) directors. 28, 2018 (in thousands):


For the Years Ended
October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Revenues:
     United States$10,158,508 $9,006,730 $6,908,988 
     Europe2,253,284 2,242,976 2,495,805 
     Canada227,067 213,172 189,865 
     Asia117,698 195,023 163,761 
     India50,618 62,543 52,533 
     Australia and New Zealand537,076 533,251 578,108 
     South America and Mexico11 7,416 17,656 
     Middle East and Africa222,713 476,757 173,057 
Total$13,566,975 $12,737,868 $10,579,773 

The following table sets forth certain information aboutpresents the 1999 Plans:

revenues earned directly or indirectly from the U.S. federal government and its agencies, expressed as a percentage of total revenues:

 

 

1999 SIP

 

 

1999 ODSP

 

 

Total

 

Number of shares authorized

 

 

29,850,000

 

 

 

1,100,000

 

 

 

30,950,000

 

Number of remaining shares reserved for

   issuance at September 29, 2017

 

 

9,641,396

 

 

 

539,787

 

 

 

10,181,183

 

Number of shares relating to outstanding stock

   options at September 29, 2017

 

 

2,289,450

 

 

 

227,375

 

 

 

2,516,825

 

Number of shares available for future awards:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At September 29, 2017

 

 

7,351,946

 

 

 

312,412

 

 

 

7,664,358

 

At September 30, 2016

 

 

7,233,173

 

 

 

319,535

 

 

 

7,552,708

 

For the Years Ended
October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
33%27%32%

Effective


Contract Liabilities
Contract liabilities represent amounts billed to clients in excess of revenue recognized to date. Revenue recognized for the year ended October 2, 2020 that was included in the contract liability balance on September 27, 2019 was $410.0 million. Revenue recognized for the year ended September 27, 2019 that was included in the contract liability balance on September 28, 2012, all grants2018 was $350.3 million.
Remaining Performance Obligations     
The Company’s remaining performance obligations as of shares underOctober 2, 2020 represent a measure of the 1999 SIPtotal dollar value of work to be performed on contracts awarded and in progress. The Company had approximately $14.6 billion in remaining performance obligations as of October 2, 2020. The Company expects to recognize 50% of our remaining performance obligations within the next twelve months and the remaining 50% thereafter.
Although remaining performance obligations reflect business that is considered to be firm, cancellations, scope adjustments, foreign currency exchange fluctuations or project deferrals may occur that impact their volume or the expected timing of their recognition. Remaining performance obligations are issued on a fungible basis.  An award other than an option or SAR are granted on a 1.92-to-1.00 basis (“Fungible”). An award of an option or SAR are granted on a 1-to-1 basis (“Not Fungible”).

F-20

adjusted to reflect any known project
F-18

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS - (Continued)

The following table presents the Fair Value of shares (of restricted stock

cancellations, revisions to project scope and restricted stock units) vested for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016cost, foreign currency exchange fluctuations and October 2, 2015 (in thousands):

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units

   (service condition)

 

$

34,466

 

 

$

17,481

 

 

$

18,568

 

Restricted Stock Units (service, market, and

   performance conditions at target)

 

 

4,183

 

 

 

4,336

 

 

 

11,264

 

Total

 

$

38,649

 

 

$

21,817

 

 

$

29,832

 

The following table presents the Company’s total pre-tax compensation cost relating to share-based payments included in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015(in thousands):  

 

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

 

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

$

38,764

 

 

$

32,370

 

 

$

41,412

 

At September 29, 2017, the amount of compensation cost relating to nonvested awards not yet recognized in the financial statements is approximately $83.7 million. The majority of the unrecognized compensation costs will be recognized by the first quarter of fiscal 2019. The weighted average remaining contractual term of options currently exercisable is 4.8 years.

Stock Options

The following table summarizes the stock option activity for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015:

 

 

Number of

Stock

Options

 

 

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price

 

Outstanding at September 26, 2014

 

 

4,221,147

 

 

$

53.23

 

Granted

 

 

614,759

 

 

$

43.56

 

Exercised

 

 

(34,000

)

 

$

31.54

 

Cancelled or expired

 

 

(729,199

)

 

$

86.15

 

Outstanding at October 2, 2015

 

 

4,072,707

 

 

$

46.06

 

Granted

 

 

460,770

 

 

$

42.17

 

Exercised

 

 

(412,416

)

 

$

40.88

 

Cancelled or expired

 

 

(543,549

)

 

$

49.13

 

Outstanding at September 30, 2016

 

 

3,577,512

 

 

$

45.69

 

Granted

 

 

 

 

$

 

Exercised

 

 

(906,648

)

 

$

43.79

 

Cancelled or expired

 

 

(154,039

)

 

$

48.79

 

Outstanding at September 29, 2017

 

 

2,516,825

 

 

$

46.19

 

F-21


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Stock options outstanding at September 29, 2017 consisted entirely of nonqualified stock options. The following table presents the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised for the fiscal years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015 (in thousands):

For the Years Ended

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

$

14,713

 

 

$

4,149

 

 

$

442

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The total intrinsic value of stock options exercisable at September 29, 2017 was approximately $23.5 million. The following table presents certain other information regarding our 1999 SIP and 1999 OSDP for the fiscal years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015:

 

 

September 29,
2017

 

 

September 30,
2016

 

 

October 2,
2015

 

At fiscal year end:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Range of exercise prices for options

   outstanding

 

$32.51–$80.63

 

 

$32.51–$80.63

 

 

$32.51–$80.63

 

Number of options exercisable

 

 

1,992,022

 

 

 

2,581,421

 

 

 

2,590,560

 

For the fiscal year:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Range of prices relating to options

   exercised

 

$37.03–$55.53

 

 

$36.88–$55.00

 

 

$25.87–$42.74

 

Estimated weighted average fair values of

   options granted

 

$

 

 

$

12.80

 

 

$

13.41

 


The following table presents certain information regarding stock options outstanding and stock options exercisable at September 29, 2017:

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

 

Options Outstanding

 

 

Options Exercisable

 

Range of Exercise Prices

 

Number

 

 

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Life

(years)

 

 

Weighted

Average

Price

 

 

Number

 

 

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price

 

$32.51 - $37.03

 

 

247,875

 

 

 

4.47

 

 

$

36.99

 

 

 

247,875

 

 

$

36.99

 

$37.43 - $46.09

 

 

1,360,188

 

 

 

5.63

 

 

$

42.69

 

 

 

890,206

 

 

$

42.65

 

$47.11 - $55.13

 

 

836,812

 

 

 

5.30

 

 

$

52.81

 

 

 

788,116

 

 

$

52.80

 

$60.08 - $80.63

 

 

71,950

 

 

 

4.23

 

 

$

66.92

 

 

 

65,825

 

 

$

67.52

 

 

 

 

2,516,825

 

 

 

5.37

 

 

$

46.19

 

 

 

1,992,022

 

 

$

46.78

 

The 1999 ODSP and the 1999 SIP allow participants to satisfy the exercise price of stock options by tendering shares of Jacobs common stock that have been owned by the participants for at least six months. Shares so tendered are retired and canceled, and are shownproject deferrals, as repurchases of common stock in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity.

F-22


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Restricted Stock

The following table presents the number of shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units issued as common stock under the 1999 SIP for the year ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015:

appropriate.

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Restricted stock

 

 

 

 

 

597,091

 

 

 

507,882

 

Restricted stock units (service condition)

 

 

496,951

 

 

 

183,131

 

 

 

126,635

 

Restricted stock units (service, market and

   performance conditions)

 

 

237,058

 

 

 

372,794

 

 

 

219,965

 

The amount of restricted stock units issued for awards with performance and market conditions in the above table are issued based on performance against the target amount. The number of shares ultimately issued, which could be greater or less than target, will be based on achieving specific performance conditions described in Note 2 – Significant Accounting Policies.

The share amounts in the above tables reflect the Non-Fungible share counting of one share for each share of restricted stock and restricted stock unit issued.

The following table presents the number of shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units cancelled and withheld for taxes under the 1999 SIP for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015:

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Restricted stock

 

 

365,481

 

 

 

512,903

 

 

 

326,480

 

Restricted stock units (service condition)

 

 

128,536

 

 

 

177,640

 

 

 

70,296

 

Restricted stock units (service, market and

   performance conditions)

 

 

86,742

 

 

 

275,933

 

 

 

194,116

 

The amount of unvested restricted stock units cancelled for awards with service and performance conditions in the above table is based on the service period achieved and performance against the target amount.

The share amounts in the above tables reflect the Non-Fungible share counting of one share for each share of restricted stock and restricted stock unit issued.

The restrictions attached to restricted stock and restricted stock units generally relate to the recipient’s ability to sell or otherwise transfer the stock or stock units. There are also restrictions that subject the stock and stock units to forfeiture back to the Company until earned by the recipient through continued employment or service.

The following table provides the number of shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units outstanding at September 29, 2017 under the 1999 SIP. Shares granted in the table below are granted on a 1.92 -to-1.00 basis (fungible):

September 29, 2017

Total

Restricted stock

950,593

Restricted stock units (service condition)

766,759

Restricted stock units (service, market and

   performance conditions)

672,440

F-23


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table presents the number of shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units issued under the 1999 ODSP for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015:

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Restricted stock units (service condition)

 

 

21,123

 

 

 

23,090

 

 

 

13,500

 

The following table provides the number of shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units outstanding at September 29, 2017 under the 1999 ODSP:

September 29, 2017

Restricted stock

34,000

Restricted stock units (service condition)

90,595

All shares granted under the 1999 ODSP are issued on a 1-to-1 basis.

Modification

On January 18, 2017, the Company modified time vested outstanding restricted stock units, paid out in stock and cash, specifically to allow participants to be entitled to dividend equivalents during the vesting period on the outstanding RSUs.  Dividends will be paid out at the end of the vesting period and are forfeitable before the vesting period concludes.  This modification affected 786 employees and resulted in $1.1 million of incremental compensation cost and will be recognized over the remaining vesting period for each grant, since dividends are forfeitable until vesting is achieved.

4.    Earnings Per Share

and Certain Related Information

Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share

Basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) are computed using the two-class method, which is an earnings allocation method that determines earnings per share (“EPS”)EPS for common shares and participating securities. The undistributed earnings are allocated between common shares and participating securities as if all earnings had been distributed during the period. Participating securities and common shares have equal rights to undistributed earnings. Net earnings used for the purpose of determining basic and diluted earnings per shareEPS is determined by taking net earnings, less earnings available to participating securities.

F-24

F-19

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS - (Continued)

The following table reconciles the denominator used to compute basic EPS to the denominator used to compute diluted EPS for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 20152020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018 (in thousands):

 

For the Years Ended

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

October 2, 2015

 

 

October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018

Numerator for Basic and Diluted EPS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Numerator for Basic and Diluted EPS:

Net income

 

$

293,727

 

 

$

210,463

 

$

302,971

 

 

Net income allocated to participating securities

 

 

(3,077

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income allocated to common stock for EPS calculation

 

$

290,650

 

 

$

210,463

 

$

302,971

 

 

Net earnings (loss) attributable to Jacobs from continuing operationsNet earnings (loss) attributable to Jacobs from continuing operations$353,861 $290,960 $(4,185)
Net earnings from continuing operations allocated to participating securitiesNet earnings from continuing operations allocated to participating securities(72)(415)
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations allocated to common stock for EPS calculationNet earnings (loss) from continuing operations allocated to common stock for EPS calculation$353,789 $290,545 $(4,185)
Net earnings attributable to Jacobs from discontinued operationsNet earnings attributable to Jacobs from discontinued operations$137,984 $557,019 $167,616 
Net earnings from discontinued operations allocated to participating securitiesNet earnings from discontinued operations allocated to participating securities(28)(795)(808)
Net earnings from discontinued operations allocated to common stock for EPS calculationNet earnings from discontinued operations allocated to common stock for EPS calculation$137,956 $556,224 $166,808 
Net earnings allocated to common stock for EPS calculationNet earnings allocated to common stock for EPS calculation$491,745 $846,769 $162,623 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator for Basic and Diluted EPS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator for Basic and Diluted EPS:

Weighted average basic shares

 

 

119,370

 

 

 

120,133

 

 

125,007

 

 

Weighted average basic shares131,541 138,104 138,182 
Shares allocated to participating securitiesShares allocated to participating securities(27)(197)(646)
Shares used for calculating basic EPS attributable to common stockShares used for calculating basic EPS attributable to common stock131,514 137,907 137,536 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of dilutive securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of dilutive securities:

Stock compensation plans

 

 

777

 

 

 

680

 

481

 

 

Restricted stock

 

 

1,319

 

 

 

670

 

622

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted shares

 

 

121,466

 

 

 

121,483

 

 

126,110

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares allocated to participating securities

 

 

(1,319

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock compensation plans (1)Stock compensation plans (1)1,207 1,299 

Shares used for calculating diluted EPS attributable to common stock

 

 

120,147

 

 

 

121,483

 

 

126,110

 

 

Shares used for calculating diluted EPS attributable to common stock132,721 139,206 137,536 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Earnings Per Share:Net Earnings Per Share:
Basic Net Earnings (Loss) from Continuing Operations Per ShareBasic Net Earnings (Loss) from Continuing Operations Per Share$2.69 $2.11 $(0.03)
Basic Net Earnings from Discontinued Operations Per ShareBasic Net Earnings from Discontinued Operations Per Share$1.05 $4.03 $1.21 

Basic EPS

 

$

2.43

 

 

$

1.75

 

$

2.42

 

 

Basic EPS$3.74 $6.14 $1.18 
Diluted Net Earnings (Loss) from Continuing Operations Per ShareDiluted Net Earnings (Loss) from Continuing Operations Per Share$2.67 $2.09 $(0.03)
Diluted Net Earnings from Discontinued Operations Per ShareDiluted Net Earnings from Discontinued Operations Per Share$1.04 $4.00 $1.21 

Diluted EPS

 

$

2.42

 

 

$

1.73

 

$

2.40

 

 

Diluted EPS$3.71 $6.08 $1.18 

(1)     For the fiscal 2018 period, because net earnings (loss) from continuing operations was a loss, the effect of antidilutive securities of 1,176 was excluded from the denominator in calculating diluted EPS.
F-20

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Share Repurchases

On July 23, 2015,January 17, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors approvedauthorized a share repurchase program to repurchaseof up to $1.0 billion of the Company’s common stock, to expire on January 16, 2022 (the "2019 Repurchase Authorization"). During fiscal 2019, the Company launched accelerated share repurchase programs by advancing a total of $500 million to 2 financial institutions in privately negotiated transactions (collectively, the "2019 ASR Programs"). The specific number of shares that the Company repurchased under the 2019 ASR Programs was determined based generally on a discount to the volume-weighted average price per share of the Company's common stock overduring a calculation period which ended on June 5, 2019 for the ensuing three yearsfirst $250 million in repurchases and on December 4, 2019 for the second $250 million in repurchases. The purchases were recorded as share retirements for purposes of calculating earnings per share.
The following table summarizes the activity under the 2019 Repurchase Authorization during fiscal 2020:
Amount Authorized
(2019 Repurchase Authorization)
Average Price Per Share (1)Shares RepurchasedTotal Shares Retired
$1,000,000,000$81.684,129,0034,129,003
(1)Includes commissions paid and calculated at the average price per share
As a precautionary measure in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company temporarily suspended purchases under the share repurchase plan in March 2020, with such suspension remaining in effect through the fiscal third quarter of 2020. During the fourth fiscal quarter of 2020, the Company resumed share repurchases on a limited basis. As of October 2, 2020, the Company has $57.9 million remaining under the 2019 Repurchase Authorization.
On January 16, 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized an additional share repurchase program of up to $1.0 billion of the Company’s common stock, to expire on January 15, 2023 (the "2015 Share"2020 Repurchase Program"Authorization"). As authorized,There have been no repurchases under the 2020 Repurchase Authorization as of October 2, 2020.
The share repurchase programs do not obligate the Company to purchase any shares. Share repurchases may be executed through various means including, without limitation, accelerated share repurchases, open market transactions, and/or privately negotiated transactions.transactions, purchases pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 plan or otherwise. The 2015 Share Repurchase Program does not obligateauthorization for the Company to purchaseshare repurchase programs may be terminated, increased or decreased by the Company’s Board of Directors in its discretion at any shares, and expires on July 22, 2018.time. The timing, amount and manner of sharesshare repurchases may depend upon market conditions and economic circumstances, availability of investment opportunities, the availability and costs of financing, currency fluctuations, the market price of the Company's common stock, other uses of capital and other factors.

The following table summarizes the activity under this program during fiscal 2017 (in thousands, except per-share amounts):

Amount

Authorized

(in thousands)

 

 

Average

Price Per

Share (1)

 

 

Shares

Retired

(In thousands)

 

 

Shares Repurchased

(In thousands)

 

$

500,000

 

 

$

55.60

 

 

 

1,748

 

 

 

1,748

 

(1)

Includes commissions paid and calculated as the average price per share since the repurchase program authorization date.

Dividend Program

On December 1, 2016, the Company announced that the Board of Directors has approved the initiation of a cash dividend program. Quarterly dividends of $0.15 per share were paid in each of the second, third and fourth quarters of fiscal

F-25


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

2017.  On September 27, 2017, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.15 per share, which was paid on November 10, 2017.  Future dividend payments are subject to review and approval by the Company’s Board of Directors.  

5.  Restructuring and Other Charges

During the second fiscal quarter of 2015, the Company began implementing a series of initiatives intended to improve operational efficiency, reduce costs, and better position itself to drive growth of the business in the future. We refer to these initiatives, in the aggregate, as the "2015 Restructuring". These activities evolved and developed over time as management identified and evaluated opportunities for changes in the Company’s operations (and related areas of potential cost savings), as economic conditions changed and as the realignment of the Company’s operations into its four global lines of business was implemented.  Actions related to the 2015 Restructuring included involuntary terminations, the abandonment of certain leased offices, combining operational organizations, and the co-location of employees into other existing offices. We did not exit any service types or client end-markets in connection with the 2015 Restructuring.

The majority of the costs associated with the 2015 Restructuring are included in SG&A expense in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. The following table summarizes the impacts of the 2015 Restructuring on the Company's reportable segment income by line of business for the years ended September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016 (in thousands):

 

September 29, 2017

 

September 30, 2016

 

Aerospace & Technology

$

1,820

 

$

5,835

 

Buildings & Infrastructure

 

23,675

 

 

23,378

 

Industrial

 

6,698

 

 

29,690

 

Petroleum & Chemicals

 

36,664

 

 

87,188

 

Corporate

 

29,831

 

 

41,816

 

Total Restructuring Charges

$

98,688

 

$

187,907

 

Total 2015 restructuring charges were $157,192 for the year ended October 2, 2015.  The activity in the Company’s accrual for the 2015 Restructuring for the year ended September 29, 2017 is as follows (in thousands):

Balance at September 30, 2016

$

152,174

 

Charges

 

98,688

 

Payments

 

(122,407

)

Balance at September 29, 2017

$

128,455

 

The following table summarizes the 2015 Restructuring by major type of restructuring costs for the years ended September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016 (in thousands):

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Lease Abandonments

 

$

55,647

 

 

$

92,643

 

 

$

90,569

 

Involuntary Terminations

 

 

30,716

 

 

 

85,599

 

 

 

55,313

 

Outside Services

 

 

4,236

 

 

 

7,398

 

 

 

12,734

 

Other restructuring related costs, net

 

 

8,089

 

 

 

2,267

 

 

 

(1,424

)

Total

 

$

98,688

 

 

$

187,907

 

 

$

157,192

 

F-26


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Cumulative amounts incurred to date for the 2015 Restructuring by each major type of restructuring costs as of September 29, 2017 is as follows (in thousands):

Lease Abandonments

$

238,859

 

Involuntary Terminations

 

171,628

 

Outside Services

 

24,368

 

Other restructuring related costs, net

 

8,932

 

Total

$

443,787

 

The 2015 Restructuring was completed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017.

Also, during the second fiscal quarter of 2017, the Company entered into strategic business restructuring activities associated with realignment of its Europe, U.K. and Middle East regional operations in our Buildings & Infrastructure segment.  Pre-tax net charges of $22.6 million were recorded associated mainly with net realizable value write-offs on contract accounts receivable of $16.5 million, with additional charges recorded for statutory redundancy and severance costs of $1.4 million and other liabilities of $4.7 million which are both expected to be paid or settled within fiscal 2018.  Additional charges of $1.2 million were recorded under this business exit during third quarter fiscal 2017 associated mainly with contract accounts receivable charges. Further, management has determined that these business restructuring activities do not qualify for discontinued operations treatment in accordance with U.S. GAAP.  

6. Borrowings

Short-Term Credit Arrangements

The Company maintains both committed and uncommitted credit arrangements with several banks providing for short-term borrowing capacity and overdraft protection. There were borrowings of $3.1 million outstanding under these short-term credit facilities at a weighted average interest rate of 4.33% at September 29, 2017, and there were borrowings of $2.4 million outstanding under these short-term credit facilities at September 30, 2016.

Long-term Debt

On February 7, 2014, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a $1.6 billion long-term unsecured, revolving credit facility (as amended the "Revolving Credit Facility") with a syndicate of large U.S. and international banks and financial institutions. The following table presents certain information regarding the Company’s long-term revolving credit facilities at September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016 (dollars in thousands):

September 29, 2017

 

September 30, 2016

Principal

Balance

Outstanding

 

 

Range

of Interest

Rates

 

Principal

Balance

Outstanding

 

 

Range

of Interest

Rates

$

235,000

 

 

1.0% – 2.23%

 

$

385,330

 

 

1.0% – 1.65%

The total amount outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility in the form of direct borrowings at September 29, 2017 was $235.0 million. The Company issued $2.5 million in letters of credit leaving $1.363 billion of available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility at September 29, 2017. In addition, the Company had $259.6 million issued under separate, committed and uncommitted letter-of-credit facilities for total issued letters of credit of $262.1 million at September 29, 2017.

The Revolving Credit Facility expires in February 2020 and permits the Company to borrow under two separate tranches in U.S. dollars, certain specified foreign currencies, and any other currency that may be approved in accordance with the terms of the Revolving Credit Facility. Depending on the Company's Consolidated Leverage Ratio, borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility will bear interest at either a euro rate plus a margin of between 1.0% and 1.5% or a base rate plus a margin of between 0% and 0.5%. The Revolving Credit Facility also provides for a financial letter of credit subfacility of $300.0 million, permits performance letters of credit, and provides for a $50.0 million subfacility for swingline loans. Letters of credit are subject to fees based on the Company's Consolidated Leverage Ratio at the time any such letter of credit is

F-27


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

issued. The Revolving Credit Facility also provides an accordion feature that allows the Company and the lenders to increase the facility amount to $2.1 billion. The Company pays a facility fee of between 0.100% and 0.25% per annum depending on the Company's Consolidated Leverage Ratio. Amounts outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility may be prepaid at the option of the Company without premium or penalty, subject to customary breakage fees in connection with the prepayment of eurocurrency loans. The Revolving Credit Facility contains affirmative, negative, and financial covenants customary for financings of this type including, among other things, limitations on certain other indebtedness, loans and investments, liens, mergers, asset sales and transactions with affiliates. In addition, the Revolving Credit Facility contains customary events of default. We were in compliance with these debt covenants at September 29, 2017.

On September 28, 2017, the Company entered into a Second Amendment to the Revolving Credit Facility, which provides for, among other things, an amendment to certain financial definitions used in the Revolving Credit Facility, including “Consolidated EBITDA”. These amendments are effective upon the consummation of the acquisition of CH2M.

On September 28, 2017, the Company entered into a $1.5 billion unsecured delayed-draw term loan facility (the “Term Loan Facility”) with a syndicate of financial institutions as lenders and letter of credit issuers and BNP Paribas as administrative agent, TD Bank, N.A. and U.S. Bank National Association as co-documentation agent, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., The Bank of Nova Scotia and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC as joint book runners, and as joint arrangers.

Subject to certain terms and conditions set forth therein, loans under the Term Loan Facility may be incurred on the day the CH2M acquisition is consummated in order to pay cash consideration for the acquisition, and to pay fees and expenses related to the acquisition and the Term Loan Facility.  The Term Loan Facility has a three year maturity from the date of initial funding and permits the Company to borrow in U.S. dollars at a base rate or a eurocurrency rate.  Depending on the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio, borrowings under the Term Loan Facility will bear interest at either a eurocurrency rate plus a margin of between 1.00% and 1.50% or a base rate plus a margin of between 0.00% and 0.50%. In addition, prior to the date the acquisition is consummated, the Company must pay a ticking fee of between 0.10% and 0.25% of unused commitments under the Term Loan Facility. Amounts outstanding under the Term Loan Facility may be prepaid at the option of the Company without premium or penalty, subject to customary breakage fees in connection with the prepayment of eurocurrency loans.

The Term Loan Facility contains affirmative, negative and financial covenants customary for financings of this type, including, among other things, limitations on certain other indebtedness, investments, liens, mergers, asset sales and transactions with affiliates. In addition, the Term Loan Facility contains customary events of default.  We were in compliance with these covenants at September 29, 2017.

The following table presents certain additional information regarding the Company’s long-term debt for the fiscal years shown:

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end

   during the fiscal year

 

$

659,103

 

 

$

958,460

 

Average amount outstanding during the year

 

$

639,210

 

 

$

825,641

 

Weighted average interest rate during the year

 

 

1.67

%

 

 

1.39

%

The following table presents the amount of interest paid by the Company during September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015 (in thousands):

For the Years Ended

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

$

12,862

 

 

$

13,282

 

 

$

15,506

 

F-28


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

7. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans

Company-Only Sponsored Plans

We sponsor various defined benefit pension plans covering employees of certain U.S. and international subsidiaries. The pension plans provide pension benefits that are based on the employee’s compensation and years of service. Our funding policy is to fund the actuarially determined accrued benefits where applicable, allowing for projected compensation increases using the projected unit method.

The accounting for pension and other post-retirement benefit plans requires the use of assumptions and estimates in order to calculate periodic benefit cost and the value of the plans’ assets and benefit obligations.  These assumptions include discount rates, investment returns, and projected salary increases, among others.  The discount rates used in valuing the plans' benefit obligations were determined with reference to high quality corporate and government bonds that are appropriately matched to the duration of each plan's obligations.  The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is generally based on using country-specific simulation models which select a single outcome for expected return based on the target asset allocation.  The expected long-term-rates of return used in the valuation are the annual average returns generated by these assumptions over a 20-year period for each asset class based on the expected long-term rate of return of the underlying assets.

The following table sets forth the changes in the plans’ combined net benefit obligation (segregated between plans existing within and outside the U.S.) for the years ended September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016 (in thousands):

 

 

U.S. Pension Plans

 

 

Non-U.S. Pension Plans

 

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

Net benefit obligation at the beginning of the year

 

$

185,664

 

 

$

533,665

 

 

$

1,363,782

 

 

$

1,155,592

 

Service cost

 

 

1,000

 

 

 

9,875

 

 

 

7,509

 

 

 

14,378

 

Interest cost

 

 

5,757

 

 

 

16,746

 

 

 

31,205

 

 

 

38,892

 

Participants’ contributions

 

 

 

 

 

1,847

 

 

 

250

 

 

 

2,255

 

Actuarial (gains)/losses

 

 

(9,922

)

 

 

29,129

 

 

 

(142,273

)

 

 

382,691

 

Benefits paid

 

 

(14,338

)

 

 

(14,143

)

 

 

(40,208

)

 

 

(32,277

)

Curtailments/settlements

 

 

 

 

 

(35,224

)

 

 

(1,375

)

 

 

(35,375

)

Transfers *

 

 

 

 

 

(356,231

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes and other, net

 

 

1,781

 

 

 

 

 

 

87,917

 

 

 

(162,374

)

Net benefit obligation at the end of the year

 

$

169,942

 

 

$

185,664

 

 

$

1,306,807

 

 

$

1,363,782

 

* Pension plan transferred to a new sponsor for the plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following table sets forth the changes in the combined Fair Value of the plans’ assets (segregated between plans existing within and outside the U.S.) for the year ended September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016 (in thousands):

 

 

U.S. Pension Plans

 

 

Non-U.S. Pension Plans

 

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

October 2, 2016

 

Fair value of plan assets at the beginning of the year

 

$

142,464

 

 

$

379,907

 

 

$

1,003,911

 

 

$

896,298

 

Actual return on plan assets

 

 

18,662

 

 

 

28,835

 

 

 

16,789

 

 

 

242,927

 

Employer contributions

 

 

1,000

 

 

 

10,213

 

 

 

21,005

 

 

 

23,217

 

Participants’ contributions

 

 

 

 

 

1,847

 

 

 

250

 

 

 

2,255

 

Gross benefits paid

 

 

(14,338

)

 

 

(14,143

)

 

 

(40,208

)

 

 

(32,277

)

Curtailments/settlements

 

 

 

 

 

(35,224

)

 

 

(228

)

 

 

(1,863

)

Transfers*

 

 

 

 

 

(228,971

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes and other, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75,409

 

 

 

(126,646

)

Fair value of plan assets at the end of the year

 

$

147,788

 

 

$

142,464

 

 

$

1,076,928

 

 

$

1,003,911

 

* Pension plan transferred to a new sponsor for the plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F-29


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

During fiscal 2017 we curtailed the pension plan in Ireland and in fiscal 2016 we curtailed our U.K. and French pension plans.

The following table reconciles the combined funded statuses of the plans recognized in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016 (segregated between plans existing within and outside the U.S.) (in thousands):

 

 

U.S. Pension Plans

 

 

Non-U.S. Pension Plans

 

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

Net benefit obligation at the end of the year

 

$

169,942

 

 

$

185,664

 

 

$

1,306,807

 

 

$

1,363,782

 

Fair value of plan assets at the end of the year

 

 

147,788

 

 

 

142,464

 

 

 

1,076,928

 

 

 

1,003,911

 

Under funded amount recognized at the end of the year

 

$

22,154

 

 

$

43,200

 

 

$

229,879

 

 

$

359,871

 

The following table presents the accumulated benefit obligation at September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016 (segregated between plans existing within and outside the U.S.) (in thousands):

 

 

U.S. Pension Plans

 

 

Non-U.S. Pension Plans

 

 

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

Accumulated benefit obligation at the end of the year

 

$

169,942

 

 

$

185,664

 

 

$

1,291,600

 

 

$

1,331,884

 

 

The following table presents the amounts recognized in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016 (segregated between plans existing within and outside the U.S.) (in thousands):

 

 

U.S. Pension Plans

 

 

Non-U.S. Pension Plans

 

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

Prepaid benefit cost included in prepaid assets

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

3,035

 

 

$

492

 

Accrued benefit cost included in current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

585

 

 

 

608

 

Accrued benefit cost included in noncurrent liabilities

 

 

22,154

 

 

 

43,200

 

 

 

232,329

 

 

 

359,755

 

Net amount recognized at the end of the year

 

$

22,154

 

 

$

43,200

 

 

$

229,879

 

 

$

359,871

 

In fiscal 2015 and through June 30, 2016, we were responsible for administering a U.S. pension plan for participating employees who were assigned to, and worked exclusively on, a specific operating contract with the U.S. federal government. The costs of this pension plan were fully reimbursed by the U.S. federal government pursuant to applicable cost accounting standards.  As of June 30, 2016, we ceased performing on this operating contract, and, as such, we are no longer responsible for administering this pension plan. As a result of no longer administering the plan, we derecognized the plan benefit obligation and plan assets pertaining to the plan resulting in a decrease of plan benefit obligation by $356.2 million and plan assets by $229.0 million.

The following table presents the significant actuarial assumptions used in determining the funded statuses and the following year's benefit cost of the Company’s U.S. plans for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015:

 

 

For the Year Ended

 

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Weighted average discount rates

 

 

3.5

%

 

3.2

 

 

3.9% to 4.0%

 

Rates of compensation increases

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

3.0

%

Return on Assets

 

 

7.5

%

 

 

7.4

%

 

 

7.4

%

F-30


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table presents the significant actuarial assumptions used in determining the funded statuses and the following year's benefit cost of the Company’s non-U.S. pension plans for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015:

September 29, 2017

September 30, 2016

October 2, 2015

Weighted average discount rates

1.3% to 7.0%

0.7% to 7.0%

1.6% to 7.8%

Rates of compensation increases

2.5% to 7.5%

2.5% to 7.5%

2.4% to 7.5%

Expected long-term rates of return on assets

3.5% to 8.5%

3.5% to 8.5%

3.5% to 8.5%

The following table presents certain amounts relating to our U.S. pension plans recognized in accumulated other comprehensive (gain) loss at September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015 (in thousands):

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Arising during the period:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net actuarial (gain) loss

 

$

(11,372

)

 

$

4,337

 

 

$

12,237

 

Reclassification adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net actuarial losses

 

 

(2,431

)

 

 

(2,312

)

 

 

(2,347

)

Total

 

$

(13,803

)

 

$

2,025

 

 

$

9,890

 

The following table presents certain amounts relating to our non-U.S. pension plans recognized in accumulated other comprehensive (gain) loss at September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015 (in thousands):

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Arising during the period:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net actuarial (gain) loss

 

$

(76,860

)

 

$

102,925

 

 

$

(27,165

)

Prior service cost (benefit)

 

 

119

 

 

 

580

 

 

 

(1,512

)

Total

 

 

(76,741

)

 

 

103,505

 

 

 

(28,677

)

Reclassification adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net actuarial losses

 

 

(8,732

)

 

 

(7,508

)

 

 

(14,034

)

Prior service cost

 

 

229

 

 

 

163

 

 

 

51

 

Total

 

 

(8,503

)

 

 

(7,345

)

 

 

(13,983

)

Total

 

$

(85,244

)

 

$

96,160

 

 

$

(42,660

)

The following table presents certain amounts relating to our pension plans recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss that have not yet been recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost at September 29, 2017, and September 30, 2016 (segregated between U.S. and non-U.S. plans) (in thousands):

 

 

U.S. Pension Plans

 

 

Non-U.S. Pension Plans

 

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

Net actuarial loss

 

$

47,681

 

 

$

61,483

 

 

$

218,752

 

 

$

304,345

 

Prior service cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(855

)

 

 

(1,203

)

Total

 

$

47,681

 

 

$

61,483

 

 

$

217,897

 

 

$

303,142

 

F-31


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table presents the amount of accumulated comprehensive income that will be amortized against earnings as part of our net periodic benefit cost in fiscal 2018 based on 2017 exchange rates (segregated between U.S. and non-U.S. plans) (in thousands):

 

 

U.S.

Pension

Plans

 

 

Non-U.S.

Pension

Plans

 

Unrecognized net actuarial loss

 

$

3,325

 

 

$

6,829

 

Unrecognized prior service cost

 

 

 

 

 

(277

)

Accumulated comprehensive loss to be recorded against

   earnings

 

$

3,325

 

 

$

6,552

 

We consider various factors in developing the estimates for the expected, long-term rates of return on plan assets. These factors include the projected, long-term rates of returns on the various types of assets in which the plans invest, as well as historical returns. In general, investment allocations are determined by each plan’s trustees and/or investment committees. The objectives of the plans’ investment policies are to (i) maximize returns while preserving capital; (ii) provide returns sufficient to meet the current and long-term obligations of the plan as the obligations become due; and (iii) maintain a diversified portfolio of assets so as to reduce the risk associated with having a disproportionate amount of the plans’ total assets invested in any one type of asset, issuer or geography. None of our pension plans hold Jacobs common stock directly (although some plans may hold shares indirectly through investments in mutual funds). The plans’ weighted average asset allocations at September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016 (the measurement dates used in valuing the plans’ assets and liabilities) were as follows:

 

 

U.S. Pension Plans

 

 

Non-U.S. Pension Pans

 

 

 

September 29,

2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

Equity securities

 

 

70

%

 

 

71

%

 

 

24

%

 

 

25

%

Debt securities

 

 

23

%

 

 

20

%

 

 

32

%

 

 

32

%

Real estate investments

 

 

%

 

 

2

%

 

 

5

%

 

 

6

%

Other

 

 

7

%

 

 

7

%

 

 

39

%

 

 

37

%

The following table presents the Fair Value of the Company’s Domestic U.S. plan assets at September 29, 2017, segregated by level of Fair Value measurement inputs within the Fair Value hierarchy promulgated by U.S. GAAP (in thousands):

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

 

Fair Value, Determined Using Fair Value Measurement Inputs

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

U.S. Domestic equities

 

$

103,760

 

 

$

 

 

$

103,760

 

U.S. Domestic bonds

 

 

33,404

 

 

 

 

 

 

33,404

 

Cash and equivalents

 

 

4,448

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,448

 

Hedge funds

 

 

 

 

 

6,176

 

 

 

6,176

 

Total

 

$

141,612

 

 

$

6,176

 

 

$

147,788

 

F-32


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table presents the Fair Value of the Company’s non-U.S. pension plan assets at September 29, 2017, segregated by level of Fair Value measurement inputs within the Fair Value hierarchy promulgated by U.S. GAAP (in thousands):

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

 

Fair Value, Determined Using Fair Value Measurement Inputs

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

U.S. Domestic equities

 

$

30,916

 

 

$

 

 

$

30,916

 

Overseas equities

 

 

229,205

 

 

 

 

 

 

229,205

 

U.S. Domestic bonds

 

 

263,145

 

 

 

 

 

 

263,145

 

Overseas bonds

 

 

77,682

 

 

 

 

 

 

77,682

 

Cash and equivalents

 

 

38,924

 

 

 

 

 

 

38,924

 

Real estate

 

 

 

 

 

58,974

 

 

 

58,974

 

Insurance contracts

 

 

 

 

 

74,353

 

 

 

74,353

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

303,729

 

 

 

303,729

 

Total

 

$

639,872

 

 

$

437,056

 

 

$

1,076,928

 

The following table presents the Fair Value of the Company’s U.S. pension plan assets at September 30, 2016, segregated by level of Fair Value measurement inputs within the Fair Value hierarchy promulgated by U.S. GAAP (in thousands):

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

 

Fair Value, Determined Using Fair Value Measurement Inputs

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

U.S. Domestic equities

 

$

85,494

 

 

$

 

 

$

85,494

 

Overseas equities

 

 

15,169

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,169

 

U.S. Domestic bonds

 

 

28,886

 

 

 

 

 

 

28,886

 

Cash and equivalents

 

 

3,723

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,723

 

Real estate

 

 

 

 

 

3,477

 

 

 

3,477

 

Hedge funds

 

 

 

 

 

5,715

 

 

 

5,715

 

Total

 

$

133,272

 

 

$

9,192

 

 

$

142,464

 

The following table presents the Fair Value of the Company’s non-U.S. pension plan assets at September 30, 2016, segregated by level of Fair Value measurement inputs within the Fair Value hierarchy promulgated by U.S. GAAP (in thousands):

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

 

Fair Value, Determined Using Fair Value Measurement Inputs

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

U.S. Domestic equities

 

$

31,972

 

 

$

 

 

$

31,972

 

Overseas equities

 

 

220,179

 

 

 

 

 

 

220,179

 

U.S. Domestic bonds

 

 

258,949

 

 

 

 

 

 

258,949

 

Overseas bonds

 

 

61,974

 

 

 

 

 

 

61,974

 

Cash and equivalents

 

 

63,182

 

 

 

 

 

 

63,182

 

Real estate

 

 

 

 

 

55,665

 

 

 

55,665

 

Insurance contracts

 

 

 

 

 

39,473

 

 

 

39,473

 

Hedge funds

 

 

 

 

 

272,517

 

 

 

272,517

 

Total

 

$

636,256

 

 

$

367,655

 

 

$

1,003,911

 

At September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016, the Company holds no assets in the U.S. or non-U.S. pension plans that use Level 2 fair value measurement inputs.

F-33


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table summarizes the changes in the Fair Value of the Company’s U.S. Pension Plans’ Level 3 assets for the year ended September 29, 2017 (in thousands):

 

 

Real

Estate

 

 

Hedge

Funds

 

Balance at September 30, 2016

 

$

3,477

 

 

$

5,715

 

Purchases, sales, and settlements

 

 

(3,477

)

 

 

(557

)

Realized and unrealized gains

 

 

 

 

 

1,018

 

Balance at September 29, 2017

 

$

 

 

$

6,176

 

The following table summarizes the changes in the Fair Value of the Company’s non-U.S. Pension Plans’ Level 3 assets for the year ended September 29, 2017 (in thousands):

 

 

Real

Estate

 

 

Insurance

Contracts

 

 

Hedge

Funds

 

Balance at September 30, 2016

 

$

55,665

 

 

$

39,473

 

 

$

272,517

 

Purchases, sales, and settlements

 

 

(1,199

)

 

 

422

 

 

 

(9,022

)

Realized and unrealized gains (losses)

 

 

2,642

 

 

 

(7,572

)

 

 

19,662

 

Transfers

 

 

 

 

 

40,031

 

 

 

11,758

 

Effect of exchange rate changes

 

 

1,866

 

 

 

1,999

 

 

 

8,814

 

Balance at September 29, 2017

 

$

58,974

 

 

$

74,353

 

 

$

303,729

 

The following table summarizes the changes in the Fair Value of the Company’s U.S. Pension Plans’ Level 3 assets for the year ended September 30, 2016 (in thousands):

 

 

Real

Estate

 

 

Hedge

Funds

 

Balance at October 2, 2015

 

$

9,914

 

 

$

16,372

 

Purchases

 

 

(6,530

)

 

 

(10,788

)

Realized and unrealized gains

 

 

93

 

 

 

131

 

Balance at September 30, 2016

 

$

3,477

 

 

$

5,715

 

The following table summarizes the changes in the Fair Value of the Company’s non-U.S. Pension Plans’ Level 3 assets for the year ended September 30, 2016 (in thousands):  

 

 

Real

Estate

 

 

Insurance

Contracts

 

 

Hedge

Funds

 

Balance at October 2, 2015

 

$

61,996

 

 

$

32,522

 

 

$

260,720

 

Purchases, sales, and settlements

 

 

(462

)

 

 

(165

)

 

 

(1,205

)

Realized and unrealized gains

 

 

2,572

 

 

 

6,451

 

 

 

57,656

 

Effect of exchange rate changes

 

 

(8,441

)

 

 

665

 

 

 

(44,654

)

Balance at September 30, 2016

 

$

55,665

 

 

$

39,473

 

 

$

272,517

 

The following table presents the amount of cash contributions we anticipate making into the plans during fiscal 2018 (in thousands):  

 

 

U.S.

Pension Plans

 

 

Non-U.S.

Pension  Pans

 

Anticipated cash contributions

 

$

1,300

 

 

$

22,574

 

F-34


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table presents the total benefit payments expected to be paid to pension plan participants during each of the next five fiscal years, and in total for the five years thereafter (in thousands):

 

 

U.S.

Pension Plans

 

 

Non-U.S.

Pension  Pans

 

2018

 

$

21,506

 

 

$

31,063

 

2019

 

 

11,372

 

 

 

32,509

 

2020

 

 

11,377

 

 

 

32,923

 

2021

 

 

11,472

 

 

 

36,220

 

2022

 

 

11,485

 

 

 

38,086

 

For the periods 2023 through 2027

 

 

54,747

 

 

 

231,183

 

The following table presents the components of net periodic benefit cost for the Company’s U.S. pension plans recognized in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015 (in thousands):

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Service cost

 

$

1,000

 

 

$

9,875

 

 

$

12,045

 

Interest cost

 

 

5,757

 

 

 

16,746

 

 

 

20,629

 

Expected return on plan assets

 

 

(9,942

)

 

 

(22,368

)

 

 

(29,526

)

Actuarial loss

 

 

3,985

 

 

 

7,512

 

 

 

3,756

 

Prior service cost

 

 

 

 

 

(176

)

 

 

(239

)

Net pension cost, before special items

 

 

800

 

 

 

11,589

 

 

 

6,665

 

Contractual expense/Settlement loss

 

 

1,781

 

 

 

8,061

 

 

 

 

Total net periodic pension cost recognized

 

$

2,581

 

 

$

19,650

 

 

$

6,665

 

The fiscal 2016 settlement loss included in the U.S. pension plan net periodic benefit cost table above related to the previously discussed transfer of a U.S. pension plan to a new service provider.

The following table presents the components of net periodic benefit cost for the Company’s Non-U.S. pension plans recognized in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015 (in thousands):

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Service cost

 

$

7,509

 

 

$

14,378

 

 

$

21,374

 

Interest cost

 

 

31,205

 

 

 

38,892

 

 

 

44,659

 

Expected return on plan assets

 

 

(56,269

)

 

 

(50,190

)

 

 

(53,052

)

Actuarial loss

 

 

10,616

 

 

 

9,092

 

 

 

17,398

 

Prior service cost

 

 

(329

)

 

 

(260

)

 

 

(96

)

Net pension cost, before special items

 

 

(7,268

)

 

 

11,912

 

 

 

30,283

 

Curtailments and settlements

 

 

(298

)

 

 

(7,512

)

 

 

255

 

Total net periodic pension cost recognized

 

$

(7,566

)

 

$

4,400

 

 

$

30,538

 

The fiscal 2016 settlement loss included in the Non-U.S. pension plan net periodic benefit cost table above related to the sale of the Company’s French subsidiary.  

Multiemployer Plans

In Canada and the U.S., we contribute to various trusteed pension plans covering hourly construction employees under industry-wide agreements. We also contribute to various trusteed plans in Australia and certain countries in Europe covering

F-35


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

both hourly and certain salaried employees. Contributions are based on the hours worked by employees covered under these agreements and are charged to direct costs of contracts on a current basis.

The majority of the contributions the Company makes to multiemployer pension plans are outside the U.S. With respect to these multiemployer plans, the Company's liability to fund these plans is generally limited to the contributions we are required to make under collective bargaining agreements.

Based on our review of our multiemployer pension plans under the guidance provided in ASU 2011-09— Compensation-Retirement Benefits-Multiemployer Plans, we have concluded that none of the multiemployer pension plans into which we contribute are individually significant to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following table presents the Company’s contributions to these multiemployer plans for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015 (in thousands):

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Canada

 

$

35,182

 

 

$

44,912

 

 

$

42,575

 

Europe

 

$

6,212

 

 

$

8,771

 

 

$

10,902

 

United States

 

$

4,548

 

 

$

5,058

 

 

$

5,968

 

Contributions to multiemployer pension plans

 

$

45,942

 

 

$

58,741

 

 

$

59,445

 

Other Benefit Plans

During the second fiscal quarter of 2017, the Company restructured certain employee welfare trust plans benefitting certain of its employees within its India operations by moving these plans under the legal ownership and operation of the Company’s legal entity structure in the region. Historically, the Company structured these plans as separate, stand-alone entities outside of the Company’s consolidated legal entity framework. As a result of these changes, the Company has recorded a one-time, non-cash benefit of $9.9 million reported in SG&A expense in its Consolidated Statement of Earnings for the year ended September 29, 2017, with corresponding assets in the plans associated with restricted investments of $7.7 million and employee loans receivable of $2.2 million and both recorded in Total other non-current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 29, 2017.

8. Other Comprehensive Income

The following table presents amounts reclassified from changes in pension liabilities in other comprehensive income to direct cost of contracts and SG&A expenses in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015 related to the Company's defined benefit pension plans (in thousands):

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Amortization of Defined Benefit Items:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actuarial losses

 

$

(14,601

)

 

$

(12,880

)

 

$

(21,153

)

Prior service cost

 

 

328

 

 

 

260

 

 

 

96

 

Total Before Income Tax

 

 

(14,273

)

 

 

(12,620

)

 

 

(21,057

)

Income Tax Benefit

 

 

3,339

 

 

 

2,963

 

 

 

4,727

 

Total reclassifications after-tax

 

$

(10,934

)

 

$

(9,657

)

 

$

(16,330

)

9. Savings and Deferred Compensation Plans

Savings Plans

We sponsor various defined contribution savings plans which allow participants to make voluntary contributions by salary deduction. Such plans cover substantially all of our domestic, nonunion employees in the U.S. and are qualified under

F-36


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Section 401(k) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Similar plans outside the U.S. cover various groups of employees of our international subsidiaries and affiliates. Several of these plans allow the Company to match, on a voluntary basis, a portion of the employee contributions. The following table presents the Company’s contributions to these savings plans for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015 (in thousands):

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

$

82,882

 

 

$

89,966

 

 

$

87,973

 

Deferred Compensation Plans

Our Executive Security Plan and Executive Deferral Plans are nonqualified deferred compensation programs that provide benefits payable to directors, officers, and certain key employees or their designated beneficiaries at specified future dates, upon retirement, or death. Benefit payments under both plans are funded by a combination of contributions from participants and the Company, and most of the participants are covered by life insurance policies with the Company designated as the beneficiary. The following table presents the amount charged to expense for the Company’s deferred compensation plans for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015 (in thousands):

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

$

4,368

 

 

$

5,792

 

 

$

5,536

 

10. Income Taxes

The following table presents the components of our consolidated income tax expense for years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015 (in thousands):

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Current income tax expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

29,297

 

 

$

36,020

 

 

$

72,840

 

State

 

 

8,535

 

 

 

11,336

 

 

 

16,248

 

Foreign

 

 

31,347

 

 

 

52,259

 

 

 

43,344

 

Total current tax expense

 

 

69,179

 

 

 

99,615

 

 

 

132,432

 

Deferred income tax expense (benefit):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 

29,390

 

 

 

6,439

 

 

 

13,337

 

State

 

 

3,407

 

 

 

485

 

 

 

2,295

 

Foreign

 

 

3,866

 

 

 

(34,331

)

 

 

(46,809

)

Total deferred tax expense (benefit)

 

 

36,663

 

 

 

(27,407

)

 

 

(31,177

)

Consolidated income tax expense

 

$

105,842

 

 

$

72,208

 

 

$

101,255

 

F-37


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Deferred taxes reflect the tax effects of temporary differences between the amounts recorded as assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the comparable amounts recorded for income tax purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The following table presents the components of our net deferred tax assets at September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016 (in thousands):

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Obligations relating to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined benefit pension plans

 

$

52,299

 

 

$

77,834

 

Other employee benefit plans

 

 

192,299

 

 

 

179,063

 

Net Operating Losses

 

 

136,783

 

 

 

139,125

 

Self-insurance programs

 

 

489

 

 

 

1,722

 

Contract revenues and costs

 

 

(18,374

)

 

 

(8,177

)

Deferred Rent

 

 

25,654

 

 

 

7,955

 

Restructuring

 

 

18,258

 

 

 

47,792

 

Other

 

 

19,389

 

 

 

9,933

 

Valuation Allowance

 

 

(58,097

)

 

 

(41,684

)

Gross deferred tax assets

 

 

368,700

 

 

 

413,563

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

(176,327

)

 

 

(154,939

)

Other, net

 

 

(1,438

)

 

 

(1,555

)

Gross deferred tax liabilities

 

 

(177,765

)

 

 

(156,494

)

Net deferred tax assets

 

$

190,935

 

 

$

257,069

 

A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized based on an assessment of positive and negative evidence, including estimates of future taxable income necessary to realize future deductible amounts.  The valuation allowance at September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016 was $58.1 million and $41.7 million, respectively.

Net operating loss carry forwards of foreign subsidiaries at September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016 totaled $490.9 million and $483.4 million, respectively. If unused, foreign net operating losses of $117.1 million will expire between 2018 and 2037.  Net operating losses of $373.8 million can be carried forward indefinitely.

The following table presents the income tax benefits realized from the exercise of nonqualified stock options and disqualifying dispositions of stock sold under our employee stock purchase plans for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015 (in millions):

For the Years Ended

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

$

5.20

 

 

$

1.50

 

 

$

0.20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F-38


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The Company’s consolidated effective income tax rate is generally lower than the US statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the impacts of favorable tax rate differences in our foreign operations. The following table reconciles total income tax expense using the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate to the consolidated income tax expense shown in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015 (dollars in thousands):

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

 

 

September 29,

2017

 

%

 

September 30,

2016

 

%

 

October 2,

2015

 

%

Statutory amount

 

$

137,626

 

35.0%

 

$

100,353

 

35.0%

 

$

150,548

 

  35.0%

State taxes, net of the federal benefit

 

 

8,955

 

2.3%

 

 

7,853

 

2.7%

 

 

12,857

 

   3.0%

Exclusion of tax on non-controlling interests

 

 

2,223

 

0.6%

 

 

(1,418

)

(0.5%

)

 

(9,069

)

(2.1%)

Foreign:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Difference in tax rates of foreign operations

 

 

(16,987

)

(4.3%

)

 

(17,184

)

(6.0%

)

 

(19,180

)

(4.5%)

Benefit from foreign valuation allowance release

 

 

(3,085

)

(0.8%

)

 

(11,182

)

(3.9%

)

 

(3,372

)

(0.8%)

Tax deductible foreign currency loss

 

 

 

0.0%

 

 

 

0.0%

 

 

(23,100

)

(5.4%)

U.K. tax rate change on deferred tax assets

 

 

 

0.0%

 

 

8,853

 

3.1%

 

 

 

   0.0%

Nontaxable income from foreign affiliate

 

 

(3,280

)

(0.8%

)

 

 

0.0%

 

 

 

    0.0%

U.S. tax cost of foreign operations

 

 

18,612

 

4.7%

 

 

30,850

 

10.9%

 

 

6,814

 

    1.6%

Tax differential on foreign earnings

 

 

(4,740

)

(1.2%

)

 

11,337

 

4.1%

 

 

(38,838

)

(9.0%)

Foreign tax credits

 

 

(20,454

)

(5.2%

)

 

(44,018

)

(15.4%

)

 

(21,313

)

(5.0%)

Uncertain tax positions

 

 

(5,779

)

(1.5%

)

 

1,449

 

0.5%

 

 

2,281

 

  0.5%

Other items:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IRS §179D deduction

 

 

(3,351

)

(0.8%

)

 

(2,153

)

(0.8%

)

 

 

    0.0%

IRS §199D deduction

 

 

(2,113

)

(0.5%

)

 

(2,800

)

(1.0%

)

 

(4,582

)

(1.1%)

Foreign partnership income/(loss)

 

 

(9,861

)

(2.5%

)

 

(2,658

)

(0.9%

)

 

11,858

 

   2.8%

Other items – net

 

 

3,336

 

0.7%

 

 

4,263

 

1.5%

 

 

(2,487

)

(0.6%)

Total other items

 

 

(11,989

)

(3.1%

)

 

(3,348

)

(1.2%

)

 

4,789

 

  1.1%

Taxes on income

 

$

105,842

 

26.9%

 

$

72,208

 

25.2%

 

$

101,255

 

23.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Company’s consolidated effective income tax rate for the year ended September 29, 2017 increased to 26.9% from 25.2% for fiscal 2016.  Key drivers for this year over year increase include the impacts of lower foreign tax credit benefits and lower benefits from valuation allowance releases on foreign deferred tax assets, partly offset by favorable impacts of U.S. tax cost of foreign operations, the non-recurrence of 2016 tax rate change impacts on deferred income tax assets in the UK and favorable impacts from change in uncertain tax positions.

The Company’s consolidated effective income tax rate for the year ended September 30, 2016 increased to 25.2% from 23.5% for fiscal 2015.  The primary components of this increase in tax rate were due mainly to unfavorable impacts from U.S. tax cost of foreign operations, the non-recurrence of tax deductible foreign currency losses in fiscal 2015, unfavorable impacts from U.K. tax rates changes on deferred tax assets and other unfavorable items.  These unfavorable impacts on the tax rate were partly offset by favorable foreign tax credits year over year, favorable income levels from our foreign partnerships in 2016 and comparably higher benefits from foreign valuation allowance releases in fiscal 2016.

The following table presents income tax payments made during the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015 (in millions):

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

$

78.39

 

 

$

116.30

 

 

$

156.50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F-39


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table presents the components of our consolidated earnings before taxes for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015 (in thousands):

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

United States earnings

 

$

232,342

 

 

$

206,159

 

 

$

283,504

 

Foreign earnings

 

 

160,875

 

 

 

80,564

 

 

 

146,633

 

 

 

$

393,217

 

 

$

286,723

 

 

$

430,137

 

United States income taxes, net of applicable credits, have been provided on the undistributed earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries, except in those instances where the earnings have been permanently reinvested. At September 29, 2017, approximately $26.1 million of such undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries have been permanently reinvested. Should these earnings be repatriated, approximately $6.0 million of income taxes would be payable.

The Company accounts for unrecognized tax benefits in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes. It accounts for interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits as interest and penalties (i.e., not as part of income tax expense). The Company’s liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits was $38.6 million and $44.2 million at September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016, respectively, all of which, if recognized, would affect the Company’s consolidated effective income tax rate. The Company had $36.6 million and $36.4 million in accrued interest and penalties at September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016, respectively. The Company estimates that, within 12 months, $6.5 million of gross, primarily non-U.S. unrecognized tax benefits will reverse due to the anticipated expiration of time to assess tax. As of September 29, 2017, the Company’s U.S. federal income tax returns for tax years 2015 and forward remain subject to examination.

The following table presents the reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015 (in thousands):

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

$

44,167

 

 

$

42,666

 

 

$

41,923

 

Additions based on tax positions related to the current

   year

 

 

5,900

 

 

 

5,670

 

 

 

6,440

 

Additions for tax positions of prior years

 

 

237

 

 

 

367

 

 

 

 

Reductions for tax positions of prior years

 

 

(4,524

)

 

 

(2,451

)

 

 

(5,697

)

Settlement

 

 

(7,200

)

 

 

(2,085

)

 

 

 

Balance, end of year

 

$

38,580

 

 

$

44,167

 

 

$

42,666

 

F-40


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

11. Commitments and Contingencies, and Derivative Financial Instruments

Commitments Under Operating Leases

We lease certain of our facilities and equipment under operating leases with net aggregate future lease payments of approximately $753,102 million at September 29, 2017, payable as follows (in thousands):

In fiscal years,

 

 

 

 

2018

 

$

139,967

 

2019

 

 

133,609

 

2020

 

 

118,207

 

2021

 

 

97,062

 

2022

 

 

104,990

 

Thereafter

 

 

174,269

 

 

 

 

768,104

 

Amounts representing sublease income

 

 

(15,002

)

 

 

$

753,102

 

We recognize rent expense, inclusive of landlord concessions and tenant allowances, over the lease term on a straight-line basis. We also recognize rent expense on a straight-line basis for leases containing fixed escalation clauses and rent holidays. Contingent rentals are included in rent expense as accruable. Operating leases relating to many of our major offices generally contain renewal options, and provide for additional rental based on escalation in operating expenses and real estate taxes.

The following table presents rent expense and sublease income offsetting the Company’s rent expense for the years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015 (in thousands):

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Rent expense

 

$

145,344

 

 

$

151,539

 

 

$

175,067

 

Sublease income

 

 

(7,052

)

 

 

(7,212

)

 

 

(5,275

)

Net rent

 

$

138,292

 

 

$

144,327

 

 

$

169,792

 

Guarantee

We are party to a synthetic lease agreement involving certain real and personal property located in Houston, Texas that we use in our operations. A synthetic lease is a type of off-balance sheet transaction which provides us with certain tax and other financial benefits. Significant terms of the lease are as follows:

End of lease term

 

 

2025

 

End of term purchase option (in thousands)

 

$

76,950

 

Residual value guaranty (in thousands)

 

$

62,412

 

The Company refinanced the synthetic lease agreement effective July 28, 2015 with a ten-year term. The new lease agreement continues to gives us the right to request an extension of the lease term. We may also assist the owner in selling the property at the end of the lease term, the proceeds from which would be used to reduce our residual value guarantee. The minimum lease payments required by the lease agreement is included in the above lease pay-out schedule. We have determined that the estimated Fair Value of the aforementioned financial guarantee was not significant at September 29, 2017.

F-41


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Derivative Financial Instruments

In situations where our operations incur contract costs in currencies other than their functional currency, we attempt to have a portion of the related contract revenues denominated in the same currencies as the costs. In those situations where revenues and costs are transacted in different currencies, we sometimes enter into foreign exchange contracts in order to limit our exposure to fluctuating foreign currencies. The Company does not currently have exchange rate sensitive instruments that would have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements or results of operations.

Letters of Credit

Letters of credit outstanding at September 29, 2017 totaled $262.1 million. Of this amount, $2.5 million has been issued under the Revolving Credit Facility and $259.6 million are issued under separate, committed and uncommitted letter-of-credit facilities.

12. Contractual Guarantees, Litigation, Investigations, and Insurance

In the normal course of business, we are subject to certain contractual guarantees and litigation. The guarantees to which we are a party generally relate to project schedules and plant performance. Most of the litigation in which we are involved has us as a defendant in workers’ compensation, personal injury, environmental, employment/labor, professional liability, and other similar lawsuits.

We maintain insurance coverage for various aspects of our business and operations. Our insurance programs have varying coverage limits and maximums, and insurance companies may seek to not pay any claims we might make. We have also elected to retain a portion of losses that occur through the use of various deductibles, limits, and retentions under our insurance programs. As a result, we may be subject to future liability for which we are only partially insured or completely uninsured. We intend to mitigate any such future liability by continuing to exercise prudent business judgment in negotiating the terms and conditions of our contracts. Our insurers are also subject to business risk and, as a result, one or more of them may be unable to fulfill their insurance obligations due to insolvency or otherwise.

Additionally, as a contractor providing services to the U.S. federal government and several of its agencies, we are subject to many levels of audits, investigations, and claims by, or on behalf of, the U.S. federal government with respect to our contract performance, pricing, costs, cost allocations, and procurement practices. Furthermore, our income, franchise, and similar tax returns and filings are also subject to audit and investigation by the Internal Revenue Service, most states within the U.S., as well as by various government agencies representing jurisdictions outside the U.S.

We record in our Consolidated Balance Sheets amounts representing our estimated liability relating to such claims, guarantees, litigation, and audits and investigations. We perform an analysis to determine the level of reserves to establish for insurance-related claims that are known and have been asserted against us, and for insurance-related claims that are believed to have been incurred based on actuarial analysis, but have not yet been reported to our claims administrators as of the respective balance sheet dates. We include any adjustments to such insurance reserves in our consolidated results of operations.  Insurance recoveries are recorded as assets if recovery is probable.  Estimated liabilities are not reduced by expected insurance recoveries.

The Company believes, after consultation with counsel, that such guarantees, litigation, U.S. government contract-related audits, investigations and claims, and income tax audits and investigations should not have any material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.

On August 9, 2014, the Company received a Notice of Arbitration from Motiva Enterprises LLC (“Motiva”) seeking monetary relief in excess of $8 billion from the Bechtel-Jacobs CEP Port Arthur Joint Venture (“BJJV”), a joint venture between Bechtel Corporation (“Bechtel”) and the Company. On December 30, 2016, the arbitral panel in this matter issued its unanimous decision, which rejected all of Motiva’s claims and assigned no liability to BJJV, the Company or Bechtel.

On September 30, 2015, Nui Phao Mining Company Limited (“NPMC”) commenced arbitration proceedings against Jacobs E&C Australia Pty Limited (“Jacobs E&C”). The arbitration is pending in Singapore before the Singapore International Arbitration Centre. In March 2011, Jacobs E&C was engaged by NPMC for the provision of management,

F-42


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

design, engineering, and procurement services for the Nui Phao mine/mineral processing project in Vietnam. In the Notice of Arbitration dated February 1, 2016, and in a subsequently filed Statement of Claim and Supplementary Statement of Claim dated February 26, 2016, and an Amended Statement of Claim dated August 17, 2017, NPMC asserts various causes of action and alleges that the quantum of its claim exceeds $167 million. Jacobs has denied liability and is vigorously defending this claim. A hearing on the merits is scheduled to begin on November 27, 2017. The Company does not expect the resolution of this matter to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows.

On December 7, 2009, the Judicial Council of California, Administrative Office of the Courts (“AOC”) initiated an action in the San Francisco County Superior Court against Jacobs Facilities Inc. (“JFI”) and Jacobs Project Management (“JPM”) and subsequently added Jacobs as a defendant.  The action arises out of a contract between AOC and JFI pursuant to which JFI provided regular maintenance and repairs at certain AOC court facilities. AOC has alleged, among other things, that the Jacobs entities are required under California’s Contractors’ State License Law (“CSLL”) to disgorge certain fees paid by AOC, and the Jacobs entities have, among other things, cross-claimed for unpaid sums for work performed.  On May 2, 2012, the jury returned a special verdict in favor of the Jacobs entities finding, among other things, JPM was owed approximately $4.7 million in unpaid fees and that JFI was not required to disgorge the approximate $18.3 million that AOC had paid for work performed.  On August 20, 2015, the California Court of Appeal reversed the jury’s verdict, holding that JFI had violated the CSLL.  The Court of Appeal remanded to the San Francisco County Superior Court for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the JFI had “substantially complied” with the CSLL under California Business and Professions Code Section 7031(e).  Establishing “substantial compliance” would prevent $18.3 million in disgorgement against Jacobs and permit Jacobs to recover $4.7 million.  The evidentiary hearing on substantial compliance was conducted between July 18 and August 5, 2016.  On December 29, 2016, the court issued a Statement of Decision in favor of the Company, finding that Jacobs Facilities had substantially complied with the CSLL, and entered a judgment in favor of JPM in the amount of $4.7 million plus prejudgment interest.  On January 30, 2017, AOC filed a notice of appeal and has filed its opening brief.  The Company’s response is due in January 2018, subject to any extensions. The Company does not expect the resolution of this matter to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows.

13. Common and Preferred Stock

Jacobs is authorized to issue two classes of capital stock designated “common stock” and “preferred stock” (each has a par value of $1.00 per share). The preferred stock may be issued in one or more series. The number of shares to be included in a series as well as each series’ designation, relative powers, dividend and other preferences, rights and qualifications, redemption provisions and restrictions are to be fixed by the Company’s Board of Directors at the time each series is issued. Except as may be provided by the Company’s Board of Directors in a preferred stock designation, or otherwise provided for by statute, the holders of shares of common stock have the exclusive right to vote for the election of directors and on all other matters requiring stockholder action. The holders of shares of common stock are entitled to dividends if and when declared by the Company’s Board of Directors from whatever assets are legally available for that purpose.

F-43

Dividends
On September 17, 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share of the Company’s common stock which was paid on October 30, 2020, to shareholders of record on the close of business on October 2, 2020. Future dividend declarations are subject to review and approval by the Company’s Board of Directors. Dividends paid through October 2, 2020 and the preceding fiscal year are as follows:  
F-21

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS - (Continued)

14.

Declaration DateRecord DatePayment DateCash Amount (per share)
July 9, 2020July 24, 2020August 21, 2020$0.19
May 5, 2020May 20, 2020June 17, 2020$0.19
January 16, 2020January 31, 2020February 28, 2020$0.19
September 19, 2019October 4, 2019November 1, 2019$0.17
July 11, 2019July 26, 2019August 23, 2019$0.17
May 2, 2019May 17, 2019June 14, 2019$0.17
January 17, 2019February 15, 2019March 15, 2019$0.17

5.    Goodwill and Intangibles
The carrying value of goodwill associated with continuing operations and appearing in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019 was as follows (in millions):
Critical Mission SolutionsPeople & Places SolutionsTotal
Balance September 27, 2019$2,202 $3,231 $5,433 
Acquired206 206 
Post-Acquisition Adjustments
Disposed(6)(6)
Foreign Exchange Impact(1)
Balance October 2, 2020$2,409 $3,230 $5,639 
The following table provides a roll-forward of the Company’s acquired intangibles in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets for the year ended October 2, 2020 (in thousands):
 Customer Relationships, Contracts and BacklogDeveloped Technology Trade NamesOtherTotal
Balances, September 27, 2019$622,392 $40,833  $1,183 $668 $665,076 
Acquired73,558 6,452  80,010 
Transfer to lease right-of-use asset as a result of adoption of ASC 842(668)(668)
Amortization(86,401)(3,734)(428)(90,563)
Foreign currency translation4,496 21  (32)4,485 
Balances, October 2, 2020$614,045 $43,572  $723 $$658,340 
Weighted Average Amortization Period (years)811 10— 8
The weighted average amortization period includes the effects of foreign currency translation.
The following table presents estimated amortization expense of intangible assets for fiscal 2021 and for the succeeding years. The amounts below include preliminary amortization estimates for the Wood Group opening balance sheet fair values that are still preliminary and are subject to change.
F-22

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Fiscal Year(in millions)
2021$90.7 
202289.7 
202389.4 
202489.2 
202588.8 
Thereafter210.5 
Total$658.3 

F-23

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
6.    Other Financial Information

Receivables

and contract assets

The following table presents the components of “Receivables” as shownreceivables appearing in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 29, 2017October 2, 2020 and September 30, 201627, 2019 as well as certain other related information (in thousands):

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

Amounts billed, net

 

$

949,060

 

 

$

1,110,042

 

Unbilled receivables and other

 

 

1,118,144

 

 

 

937,552

 

Retentions receivable

 

 

35,339

 

 

 

68,069

 

Total receivables, net

 

$

2,102,543

 

 

$

2,115,663

 

Other information about receivables:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts due from the United States federal

   government included above, net of advanced

  billings

 

$

226,236

 

 

$

235,203

 

Claims receivable

 

$

4,600

 

 

$

26,061

 

 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019
Components of receivables:
Amounts billed, net$1,294,204 $1,222,339 
Unbilled receivables and other1,449,184 1,216,028 
Contract assets423,922 401,842 
Total receivables and contract assets, net$3,167,310 $2,840,209 
Other information about receivables:  
Amounts due from the United States federal government included above, net of advanced billings$600,207 $630,975 

Billed receivables, net consist of amounts invoiced to clients in accordance with the terms of the client contracts and are shown net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. We anticipate that substantially all of such billed amounts will be collected over the next twelve months.

Unbilled receivables and retentions receivable represent reimbursable costs and amounts earned and reimbursable under contracts in progress as of the respective balance sheet dates. Such amounts become billable according to the contract terms, which usually consider the passage of time, achievement of certain milestones or completion of the project. We anticipate that substantially all of such unbilled amounts will be billed and collected over the next twelve months.

Claims receivable are included in “Receivables” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and represent certain costs incurred on contracts to the extent it is probable that such claims will result in additional contract revenue and the amount of such additional revenue can be reliably estimated.

Property, Equipment and Improvements, Net

The following table presents the components of our property, equipment and improvements, net at September 29, 2017October 2, 2020 and September 30, 201627, 2019 (in thousands):

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

October 2, 2020September 27, 2019

Land

 

$

17,197

 

 

$

16,680

 

Land$966 $355 

Buildings

 

 

93,313

 

 

 

91,194

 

Buildings21,550 14,331 

Equipment

 

 

627,609

 

 

 

531,539

 

Equipment560,352 533,804 

Leasehold improvements

 

 

220,295

 

 

 

221,437

 

Leasehold improvements187,980 247,660 

Construction in progress

 

 

21,300

 

 

 

36,764

 

Construction in progress16,410 8,781 

 

 

979,714

 

 

 

897,614

 

787,258 804,931 

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

(629,803

)

 

 

(577,941

)

Accumulated depreciation and amortization(467,887)(496,788)

 

$

349,911

 

 

$

319,673

 

$319,371 $308,143 

F-44

F-24

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Miscellaneous Noncurrent Assets

The following table presents our property, equipment and improvements, net by geographic area for the components of “Miscellaneous noncurrent assets” shownyears ended October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019 (in thousands):
For the Years Ended
October 2, 2020September 27, 2019
Property, equipment and improvements, net:
     United States$230,881 $230,476 
     Europe59,321 52,775 
     Canada2,599 3,199 
     Asia3,817 5,652 
     India10,710 2,379 
     Australia and New Zealand10,492 12,091 
     Middle East and Africa1,551 1,571 
Total$319,371 $308,143 
See discussion in Note 10- Leases, regarding impairments recorded in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 29, 2017current year relating to the Company's real estate lease portfolio and September 30, 2016 (in thousands):

related property, equipment and improvements, net. 

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

Deferred income taxes

 

$

368,700

 

 

$

413,563

 

Cash surrender value of life insurance policies

 

 

130,411

 

 

 

122,364

 

Investments

 

 

145,069

 

 

 

178,256

 

Notes receivable

 

 

17,839

 

 

 

18,303

 

Other

 

 

30,003

 

 

 

26,843

 

Total

 

$

692,022

 

 

$

759,329

 

Accrued Liabilities

The following table presents the components of “Accrued liabilities” shown in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 29, 2017October 2, 2020 and September 30, 201627, 2019 (in thousands):

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

October 2, 2020September 27, 2019

Accrued payroll and related liabilities

 

$

572,946

 

 

$

561,652

 

Accrued payroll and related liabilities$746,637 $677,313 

Project-related accruals

 

 

71,815

 

 

 

102,400

 

Project-related accruals60,531 58,835 

Non project-related accruals

 

 

68,025

 

 

 

87,813

 

Non project-related accruals237,204 258,312 

Insurance liabilities

 

 

67,546

 

 

 

54,984

 

Insurance liabilities75,267 83,968 

Sales and other similar taxes

 

 

32,163

 

 

 

37,029

 

Sales and other similar taxes104,720 34,390 

Deferred rent

 

 

60,593

 

 

 

69,059

 

Deferred rent68,914 

Dividends payable

 

 

18,180

 

 

 

 

Dividends payable25,524 23,439 

Other

 

 

48,419

 

 

 

25,441

 

Deferred gain on ECR disposition (1)Deferred gain on ECR disposition (1)179,208 
Current liabilities held for saleCurrent liabilities held for sale2,573 

Total

 

$

939,687

 

 

$

938,378

 

Total$1,249,883 $1,386,952 

(1)    See Note 15- Sale of Energy, Chemicals and Resource ("ECR") Business for discussion regarding deferred gain.

F-25

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Accumulated Other Deferred Liabilities

Comprehensive Income

The following table presents the Company's roll forward of accumulated income (loss) after-tax for the years ended October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019 (in thousands):
Change in Pension and Retiree Medical Plan LiabilitiesForeign Currency Translation AdjustmentGain/(Loss) on Cash Flow HedgesTotal
Balance at September 28, 2018$(309,867)$(496,017)$(819)$(806,703)
Other comprehensive income (loss)(104,434)(84,456)990 (187,900)
Reclassifications from other comprehensive income (loss)(22,448)100,428 (189)77,791 
Balance at September 27, 2019$(436,749)$(480,045)$(18)$(916,812)
Other comprehensive income (loss)(61,994)60,330 (17,569)(19,233)
Reclassifications from other comprehensive income (loss)17 2,971 2,988 
Balance at October 2, 2020$(498,726)$(419,715)$(14,616)$(933,057)

F-26

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
7.    Income Taxes
The following table presents the components of “Otherour consolidated income taxes for continuing operations for years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018 (in thousands):
 For the Years Ended
 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Current income tax (benefit) expense from continuing operations:   
Federal$(37,030)$25,549 $49,829 
State(5,021)6,639 (1,546)
Foreign41,616 57,156 20,858 
Total current tax expense from continuing operations(435)89,344 69,141 
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations:   
Federal53,485 6,607 230,358 
State7,133 20,408 17,318 
Foreign(4,863)(79,405)8,815 
Total deferred tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations55,755 (52,390)256,491 
Consolidated income tax expense from continuing operations$55,320 $36,954 $325,632 
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) was enacted in the United States and significantly revised the U.S. corporate income tax laws. Given the significance of the legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (SAB 118), which allowed registrants to record provisional amounts during a one year “measurement period” like that used when accounting for business combinations. As of December 22, 2018, we completed our accounting for the tax effects of the enactment of the Act. For the deferred liabilities”tax balances, we measured the U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future, which is generally 21%. The Company’s revised measurement resulted in cumulative charges to income tax expense of $144.4 million during fiscal year 2018. Additionally, in fiscal year 2019, the Company recorded $24.4 million of tax expense associated with the valuation of U.S. net operating losses that were expected to be recovered at 35%, but were actually utilized at 21%.

The Act called for a one-time tax on deemed repatriation of foreign earnings. This one-time transition tax was based on our total post-1986 earnings and profits (E&P) of certain of our foreign subsidiaries. We recorded $14.3 million in cumulative transition taxes during the measurement period in fiscal year 2018, although the transition tax was expected to be offset by foreign tax credits in the future, resulting in no additional cash tax liability.

    In fiscal 2018 the Company adopted ASU No 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The guidance provides the option to reclassify to retained earnings tax effects related to items in accumulated other comprehensive income that the FASB refers to as having been stranded in accumulated other comprehensive income as a result of tax reform. As a result of adoption of ASU 2018-02, the Company reclassified $10.2 million in accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings relating to the fiscal 2018 year deferred tax activity for its U.S. pension plans resulting from the Act.
Deferred taxes reflect the tax effects of temporary differences between the amounts recorded as assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the comparable amounts recorded for income tax purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.
F-27

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The following table presents the components of our net deferred tax assets at October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019 (in thousands):
 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019
Deferred tax assets:  
Obligations relating to:  
Defined benefit pension plans$55,949 $56,854 
Other employee benefit plans132,613 149,276 
Net operating losses197,987 241,033 
Foreign tax credit87,259 84,553 
Other credits6,808 13,881 
Contract revenues and costs70,733 51,579 
Investments49,848 23,204 
Lease liability154,979 — 
Deferred rent21,847 
Restructuring11,974 8,205 
Valuation allowance(140,578)(153,257)
Gross deferred tax assets627,572 497,175 
Deferred tax liabilities:  
Depreciation and amortization(240,097)(177,002)
Lease right of use asset(89,824)— 
Unremitted earnings(17,295)(29,761)
Partnership investment(66,082)
Other, net(6,593)(8,890)
Gross deferred tax liabilities(419,891)(215,653)
Net deferred tax assets$207,681 $281,522 
    A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized based on an assessment of positive and negative evidence, including estimates of future taxable income necessary to realize future deductible amounts. The valuation allowance was $140.6 million at October 2, 2020 and $153.3 million at September 27, 2019. Of the $12.7 million decrease in the valuation allowance, $15.1 million relates to a decrease for a change in judgment on the realizability of deferred tax assets in the U.K., which is offset by a $2.4 million increase attributable to current year activity.
At October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019, the domestic and international net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards totaled $783.9 million and $945.1 million, resulting in an NOL deferred tax asset of $198.0 million and $241.0 million, respectively. The Company's net operating losses have various expiration periods between 2021 and indefinite periods. At October 2, 2020, the Company has foreign tax credit carryforwards of $87.3 million, expiring between 2022 and 2037.
The following table presents the income tax benefits from continuing operations realized from the exercise of non-qualified stock options and disqualifying dispositions of stock sold under our employee stock purchase plans for the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018 (in millions):
For the Years Ended
October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
$10.2 $7.9 $2.2 
F-28

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The following table reconciles total income tax expense from continuing operations using the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate to the consolidated income tax expense for continuing operations shown in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018 (dollars in thousands):
 For the Years Ended
 October 2, 2020%September 27, 2019%September 28, 2018%
Statutory amount$92,652 21.0 %$73,701 21.0 %$81,421 24.6 %
State taxes, net of the federal benefit7,2541.6 %10,183 2.9 %15,772 4.8 %
Exclusion of tax on non-controlling interests(6,622)(1.5)%(4,839)(1.4)%(2,389)(0.7)%
Foreign:    
Difference in tax rates of foreign operations(6,267)(1.4)%1,083 0.3 %2,815 0.9 %
Benefit from foreign valuation allowance release(16,861)(3.8)%(29,125)(8.3)%(5,088)(1.5)%
U.S. tax cost (benefit) of foreign operations42,992 9.7 %(17,760)(5.1)%4,030 1.2 %
Tax differential on foreign earnings19,864 4.5 %(45,802)(13.1)%1,757 0.6 %
Foreign tax credits(26,471)(6.0)%(15,682)(4.5)%(21,735)(6.6)%
Tax Rate Change(6,811)(1.5)%
Tax reform0%36,674 10.4 %155,756 47.1 %
Valuation allowance0%(207)(0.1)%104,221 31.5 %
Uncertain tax positions(11,338)(2.6)%(6,883)(2.0)%(1,402)(0.4)%
Other items:
IRS §179D deduction(7,267)(1.6)%(2,957)(0.8)%(4,557)(1.4)%
Disallowed officer compensation5,0811.2 %5,568 1.6 %1,510 0.5 %
Stock compensation(10,234)(2.3)%(7,864)(2.2)%(2,158)(0.7)%
Other items – net(788)(0.2)%(4,938)(1.4)%(2,564)(0.8)%
Total other items(13,208)(3.0)%(10,191)(2.8)%(7,769)(2.4)%
Taxes on income from continuing operations$55,320 12.5 %$36,954 10.5 %$325,632 98.4 %
    The following table presents income tax payments made during the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018 (in millions):
October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
$39.8 $291.7 $44.3 
The following table presents the components of our consolidated earnings from continuing operations before taxes for the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018 (in thousands):
 For the Years Ended
 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
United States earnings$208,302 $225,898 $263,991 
Foreign earnings232,901 125,061 66,990 
 $441,203 $350,959 $330,981 
The tax cost, net of applicable credits, have been provided on the undistributed earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries. As of October 2, 2020, the estimated tax cost of repatriating earnings to the United States is approximately $16.2 million. The Company does not assert any earnings to be permanently reinvested.
The Company accounts for unrecognized tax benefits in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes. It accounts for interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits as interest and penalties reported above the line (i.e., not as part of income tax expense). The Company’s liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits was $93.4 million and $85.2 million at October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019, respectively, after ASU 2013-11 netting of $9.1 million and $19.2 million, respectively. If recognized, $86.2 million would affect the Company’s consolidated effective income tax rate. The Company had $40.4 million and $51.1 million in accrued interest and penalties at October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019, respectively. The Company estimates that, within twelve months, we may realize a decrease in our uncertain tax positions
F-29

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
of approximately $5.5 million as a result of concluding various tax audits and closing tax years. As of October 2, 2020, the Company’s U.S. federal income tax returns for tax years 2013 and forward remain subject to examination.
The following table presents the reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for both continuing and discontinued operations, with ECR-sale related impacts removed in the Acquisitions/Divestitures row, for the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018 (in thousands):
 For the Years Ended
 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Balance, beginning of year$104,355 $179,140 $38,580 
Acquisitions/Divestitures(31,004)137,912 
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year1,064 7,455 9,780 
Additions for tax positions of prior years7,472 1,994 5,561 
Reductions for tax positions of prior years(6,695)(49,849)(8,962)
Settlement(3,712)(3,381)(3,731)
Balance, end of year$102,484 $104,355 $179,140 
On March 6, 2020, the Company completed the acquisition of John Wood Group's nuclear business, on June 12, 2019, the Company completed the acquisition of KeyW and on December 15, 2017 the Company completed the acquisition of CH2M. For income tax purposes, the transactions were accounted for as stock purchases. As a result of the acquisitions, the Company adjusted its U.S. GAAP opening balance sheet of John Wood Group, KeyW and CH2M to reflect estimates of the fair value of the net assets acquired. For income tax purposes, the tax attributes and basis of net assets acquired carryover without any step-up to fair value. For John Wood Group's nuclear business, the Company has made preliminary estimates and recorded deferred taxes associated with the purchase accounting. It is expected that the Company will make adjustments to the purchase accounting over the relevant measurement period as allowed by ASC 805. For KeyW, the Company completed its purchase accounting in the third quarter of the current fiscal year.
8.    Joint Ventures and VIEs
For consolidated joint ventures, the entire amount of the revenue recognized for services performed and the costs associated with these services, including the services provided by the other joint venture partners, are included in the Company's result of operations. Likewise, the entire amount of each of the assets and liabilities are included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. There are no consolidated VIEs that have debt or credit facilities. Summary financial information of consolidated VIEs is as follows (in millions):
October 2, 2020September 27, 2019
Current assets$261.6 $192.6 
Non-Current assets0.2 
Total assets$261.8 $192.6 
Current liabilities$190.3 $138.5 
Non-current liabilities
Total liabilities$190.3 $138.5 

For the Years Ended
October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Revenue$912.9 $571.6 $481.4 
Direct cost of contracts(807.9)(526.7)(452.9)
Gross profit105.0 44.9 28.5 
Net earnings$72.6 $45.2 $28.4 
    Unconsolidated joint ventures are accounted for under the equity method or proportionate consolidation. Proportionate consolidation is used for joint ventures that include unincorporated legal entities and activities of the joint
F-30

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
venture are construction-related. For those joint ventures accounted for under proportionate consolidation, only the Company’s pro rata share of assets, liabilities, revenue, and costs are included in the Company’s balance sheet and results of operations. For the proportionate consolidated VIEs, the carrying value of assets and liabilities was $64.1 million and $63.0 million as of October 2, 2020, respectively and $61.1 million and $63.7 million as of September 27, 2019, respectively. For those joint ventures accounted for under the equity method, the Company's investment balances for the joint venture is included in other noncurrent Assets: miscellaneous on the balance sheet and the Company’s pro rata share of net income is included in revenue. In limited cases, there are basis differences between the equity in the joint venture and Jacobs' investment created when Jacobs purchased their share of the joint venture. These basis differences are amortized based on an internal allocation to underlying net assets, excluding allocations to goodwill. As of October 2, 2020, the Company’s equity method investments exceeded its share of venture net assets by $71.1 million. Our investments in equity method joint ventures on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019 were a net asset of $161.3 million and $157.9 million, respectively. During the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019, and September 28, 2018, we recognized income from equity method joint ventures of $82.2 million, $48.5 million, and $47.9 million, respectively.
Summary financial information of unconsolidated joint ventures accounted for under the equity method, as derived from their unaudited financial statements, is as follows (in millions):
October 2, 2020September 27, 2019
Current assets$1,697.0 $1,443.5 
Non-Current assets34.9 29.9 
Total assets$1,731.9 $1,473.4 
Current liabilities$889.7 $692.1 
Non-current liabilities631.0 473.6 
Total liabilities1,520.7 1,165.7 
Joint ventures' equity211.2 307.7 
Total liabilities & joint venture equity$1,731.9 $1,473.4 

For the Years Ended
October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Revenue$3,447.0 $3,533.1 $3,165.0 
Direct cost of contracts(3,126.6)(3,176.2)(2,902.5)
Gross profit$320.4 $356.9 $262.5 
Net earnings$245.3 $227.0 $221.1 
Accounts receivable from unconsolidated joint ventures accounted for under the equity method is $8.3 million and $19.5 million as of October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019, respectively.
The Company currently holds a 24.5% interest in AWE Management Ltd (AWE ML) that is accounted for under the equity method, and the carrying value of the Company’s investment as of October 2, 2020 was approximately $38 million. As of October 2, 2020, AWE ML was under a contractual operating arrangement with the UK Ministry of Defence (MoD) with multiple years remaining under the arrangement. Subsequent to year end, on November 2, 2020, the MoD unexpectedly announced plans to change its current operating agreements with AWE ML that would result in the early termination of the current contract in 2021. The Company is currently evaluating this subsequent development, including the potential impact on our accounting for this equity method investment in future quarters.
9.    Borrowings
Short-Term Debt
At September 27, 2019, short-term debt consisted of a bilateral term loan facility with an aggregate principal balance of $200.0 million (the "Bilateral Term Loan") and uncommitted credit arrangements with several banks providing short-term borrowing capacity and overdraft protection. Offset from the Bilateral Term Loan were deferred financing fees of $0.1 million. This loan was repaid during the second fiscal quarter of 2020.
F-31

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Long-term Debt
The following table presents certain information regarding the Company’s long-term debt at October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019 (dollars in thousands):
Interest RateMaturityOctober 2, 2020September 27, 2019
Revolving Credit FacilityLIBOR + applicable margin (1)March 2024$152,794 $303,780 
2020 Term Loan FacilityLIBOR + applicable margin (2)March 20251,025,826 
2017 Term Loan FacilityLIBOR + applicable margin (3)December 2020400,000 
Fixed-rate notes due:
Senior Notes, Series A4.27%May 2025190,000 190,000 
Senior Notes, Series B4.42%May 2028180,000 180,000 
Senior Notes, Series C4.52%May 2030130,000 130,000 
Less: Deferred Financing Fees(1,679)(2,535)
Total Long-term debt, net$1,676,941 $1,201,245 
(1)Depending on the Company’s Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as defined in the credit agreement governing the Revolving Credit Facility (defined below)), borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at either a eurocurrency rate plus a margin of between 0.875% and 1.5%  or a base rate plus a margin of between 0% and 0.5%. The applicable LIBOR rates, including applicable margins, at October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019 were approximately 1.39% and 2.97%.
(2)Depending on the Company’s Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as defined in the credit agreement governing the 2020 Term Loan Facility (defined below)), borrowings under the 2020 Term Loan Facility bear interest at either a eurocurrency rate plus a margin of between 0.875% and 1.5% or a base rate plus a margin of between 0% and 0.5%. The applicable LIBOR rate, including applicable margin, at October 2, 2020 was approximately 1.37%.
(3)Depending on the Company’s Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as defined in the credit agreement governing the 2017 Term Loan Facility (defined below)), borrowings under the 2017 Term Loan Facility bear interest at either a eurocurrency rate plus a margin of between 1.0% and 1.5% or a base rate plus a margin of between 0% and 0.5%. The applicable LIBOR rate, including applicable margin, at September 27, 2019 was approximately 3.05%.
On February 7, 2014, Jacobs and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a $1.6 billion long-term unsecured, revolving credit facility (as amended, the “2014 Revolving Credit Facility”) with a syndicate of U.S. and international banks and financial institutions. On March 27, 2019, the Company entered into a second amended and restated credit agreement (the "Revolving Credit Facility") which amended and restated the 2014 Revolving Credit Facility by, among other things, (a) extending the maturity date of the credit facility to March 27, 2024, (b) increasing the facility amount to $2.25 billion (with an accordion feature that allows a further increase of the facility amount up to $3.25 billion), (c) eliminating the covenants restricting investments, joint ventures and acquisitions by the Company and its subsidiaries and (d) adjusting the financial covenants to eliminate the net worth covenant upon the removal of the same covenant from the Company’s existing Note Purchase Agreement (defined below). We were in compliance with the covenants under the Revolving Credit Facility at October 2, 2020.
The Revolving Credit Facility permits the Company to borrow under 2 separate tranches in U.S. dollars, certain specified foreign currencies, and any other currency that may be approved in accordance with the terms of the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility also provides for a financial letter of credit sub facility of $400.0 million, permits performance letters of credit, and provides for a $50.0 million sub facility for swing line loans. Letters of credit are subject to fees based on the Company’s Consolidated Leverage Ratio. The Company pays a facility fee of between 0.08% and 0.20% per annum depending on the Company’s Consolidated Leverage Ratio.
F-32

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
On March 25, 2020, the Company entered into an unsecured term loan facility (the “2020 Term Loan Facility”) with a syndicate of financial institutions as lenders. Under the 2020 Term Loan Facility, the Company borrowed an aggregate principal amount of $730.0 million and one of the Company's U.K. subsidiaries borrowed an aggregate principal amount of £250.0 million. The proceeds of the term loans were used to repay the Bilateral Term Loan and for general corporate purposes. The 2020 Term Loan Facility contains affirmative and negative covenants and events of default customary for financings of this type that are consistent with those included in the Revolving Credit Facility. We were in compliance with the covenants under the 2020 Term Loan Facility at October 2, 2020. During fiscal 2020, the Company entered into interest rate and cross currency derivative contracts to swap a portion of our variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. See Note 17- Commitments and Contingencies and Derivative Financial Instruments for discussion regarding the Company's derivative instruments.
On September 28, 2017, the Company entered into a $1.5 billion unsecured delayed-draw term loan facility (as amended, the “2017 Term Loan Facility”) with a syndicate of financial institutions as lenders and letter of credit issuers. We incurred loans under the 2017 Term Loan Facility on December 15, 2017 in connection with the closing of the CH2M acquisition in order to pay cash consideration for the acquisition, and to pay fees and expenses related to the acquisition and the 2017 Term Loan Facility. The 2017 Term Loan Facility was repaid in full during the first fiscal quarter of 2020.
On March 12, 2018, Jacobs entered into a note purchase agreement (as amended, the "Note Purchase Agreement") with respect to the issuance and sale in a private placement transaction of $500.0 million in the aggregate principal amount of the Company’s senior notes in three series (collectively, the “Senior Notes”). The Note Purchase Agreement provides that if the Company's consolidated leverage ratio exceeds a certain amount, the interest on the Senior Notes may increase by 75 basis points. The Senior Notes may be prepaid at any time subject to a make-whole premium. The sale of the Senior Notes closed on May 15, 2018. The Company used the net proceeds from the offering of Senior Notes to repay certain existing indebtedness and for other general corporate purposes. The Note Purchase Agreement contains affirmative, negative and financial covenants customary for financings of this type, including, among other things, covenants to maintain a minimum consolidated net worth and maximum consolidated leverage ratio and limitations on certain liens, mergers, dispositions and transactions with affiliates. In addition, the Note Purchase Agreement contains customary events of default. We were in compliance with the covenants under the Note Purchase Agreement at October 2, 2020.
We believe the carrying value of the Revolving Credit Facility and the 2020 Term Loan Facility approximates fair value based on the interest rates and scheduled maturities applicable to the outstanding borrowings. The fair value of the Senior Notes is estimated to be $543.7 million at October 2, 2020, based on Level 2 inputs. The fair value is determined by discounting future cash flows using interest rates available for issuances with similar terms and average maturities.
The Company has issued $2.3 million in letters of credit under the Revolving Credit Facility, leaving $2.09 billion of available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility at October 2, 2020. In addition, the Company had issued $260.7 million under separate, committed and uncommitted letter-of-credit facilities for total issued letters of credit of $263.0 million at October 2, 2020. 
The following table presents the amount of interest paid by the Company during October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018 (in thousands):
For the Years Ended
October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
$58,257$81,582$68,467

10.    Leases
The components of lease expense (reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses) for the year ended October 2, 2020 were as follows (in thousands):
F-33

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Year Ended
Lease cost
Operating lease cost$169,967 
Variable lease cost35,083 
Sublease income(14,719)
Total lease cost$190,331 
Supplemental information related to the Company's leases for the year ended October 2, 2020 was as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurements of lease liabilities$195,345 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities$66,761 
Weighted average remaining lease term - operating leases7 years
Weighted average discount rate - operating leases2.7%
Total remaining lease payments under the Company's leases for each of the succeeding years is as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal YearOperating Leases
2021$184,967 
2022163,166 
2023144,668 
2024127,472 
2025107,866 
Thereafter266,539 
994,678 
Less Interest(95,164)
$899,514 

Right-of-Use and Other Long-Lived Asset Impairment
In the fourth fiscal quarter of 2020, as a result and in consideration of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and the changing nature of the Company's use of office space for its workforce, the Company evaluated its existing real estate lease portfolio as part of its transformation initiatives related to real estate and staffing programs. These initiatives during the fourth quarter resulted in the actual abandonment of certain leased office spaces and the establishment of a formal plan to sublease certain other leased spaces that will no longer be utilized by the Company. In connection with the Company’s actions related to these initiatives, the Company evaluated certain of its lease right-of-use assets and related property, equipment and leasehold improvements for impairment under ASC 360.
As a result of the analysis, the Company recognized an impairment loss during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020 of $162 million, which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statement of earnings for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2020. The impairment loss recorded includes $127 million related to right-of-use lease assets and $35 million related to other long-lived assets, including property, equipment and improvements and leasehold improvements.
The fair values for the asset groups relating to the impaired long-lived assets were estimated primarily using discounted cash flow models (income approach) with Level 3 inputs. The significant assumptions used in estimating fair value include the expected downtime prior to the commencement of future subleases, projected sublease income over the remaining lease periods and discount rates that reflects the level of risk associated with receiving future cash flows.
F-34

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
11.    Employee Stock Purchase and Stock Incentive Plans
Employee Stock Purchase Plans
Under the 1989 ESPP and the GESPP, eligible employees who elect to participate in these plans are granted the right to purchase shares of the common stock of Jacobs at a discount that is limited to 5% of the per-share market value on the day shares are sold to employees. The following table summarizes the stock issuance activity under the 1989 ESPP and the GESPP for the fiscal years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018:
 For the Years Ended
 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Aggregate Purchase Price Paid for Shares Sold:   
Under the 1989 ESPP$25,364,252 $24,824,232 $21,590,858 
Under the GESPP2,448,349 2,471,193 2,240,609 
Total$27,812,601 $27,295,425 $23,831,467 
Aggregate Number of Shares Sold:   
Under the 1989 ESPP304,018 354,580 357,899 
Under the GESPP29,060 34,843 36,405 
Total333,078 389,423 394,304 
On January 19, 2017, the Company’s stockholders approved an increase in the number of shares authorized by 4,350,000 shares for the 1989 ESPP and by 150,000 shares for the GESPP.
At October 2, 2020, there remains 3,529,357 shares reserved for issuance under the 1989 ESPP and 74,672 shares reserved for issuance under the GESPP.
Stock Incentive Plans
We also sponsor the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the "SIP") and the 1999 Outside Director Stock Plan, as amended and restated (the "ODSP"). The 1999 SIP provides for the issuance of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, share appreciation rights ("SARs"), restricted stock and restricted stock units to employees. The 1999 ODSP provides for awards of shares of common stock, restricted stock, restricted stock units and grants of non-qualified stock options to our outside (i.e., nonemployee) directors. The following table sets forth certain information about the 1999 Plans:
 1999 SIP1999 ODSPTotal
Number of shares authorized29,850,000 1,100,000 30,950,000 
Number of remaining shares reserved for issuance at October 2, 20205,272,572 359,875 5,632,447 
Number of shares relating to outstanding stock options at October 2, 2020568,114 138,375 706,489 
Number of shares available for future awards:  
At October 2, 20204,704,458 221,500 4,925,958 
At September 27, 20194,963,761 256,252 5,220,013 
Effective September 28, 2012, all grants of shares under the 1999 SIP are issued on a fungible basis.  An award other than an option or SAR are granted on a 1.92-to-1.00 basis (“Fungible”). An award of an option or SAR are granted on a 1-to-1 basis (“Not Fungible”).
F-35

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The following table presents the fair value of shares (of restricted stock and restricted stock units) vested for the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018 (in thousands):
 For the Years Ended
 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units (service condition)$29,209 $37,864 $64,121 
Restricted Stock Units (service, market, and performance conditions at target)20,998 17,124 2,626 
Total$50,207 $54,988 $66,747 
At October 2, 2020, the amount of compensation cost relating to non-vested awards not yet recognized in the financial statements is approximately $61.3 million. The majority of these unrecognized compensation costs will be recognized by the first quarter of fiscal 2022. The weighted average remaining contractual term of options currently exercisable is 2.1 years.
Stock Options
    The following table summarizes the stock option activity for the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018:
 Number of Stock OptionsWeighted Average
Exercise Price
Outstanding at September 29, 20172,516,825 $46.19 
Exercised(636,019)$46.93 
Cancelled or expired(114,047)$52.26 
Outstanding at September 28, 20181,766,759 $45.53 
Exercised(828,529)$45.63 
Cancelled or expired(11,624)$42.10 
Outstanding at September 27, 2019926,606 $45.48 
Exercised(212,467)$44.05 
Cancelled or expired(7,650)$45.31 
Outstanding at October 2, 2020706,489 $45.91 
Cash received from the exercise of stock options, net of tax remitted, during the year ended October 2, 2020 was $9.4 million.
Stock options outstanding at October 2, 2020 consisted entirely of non-qualified stock options. The following table presents the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised for the fiscal years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018 (in thousands):
For the Years Ended
October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
$9,986$27,720$13,931
F-36

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
    The total intrinsic value of stock options exercisable at October 2, 2020 was approximately $34.1 million. The following table presents certain other information regarding our 1999 SIP and 1999 OSDP for the fiscal years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018:
 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
At fiscal year end:   
Range of exercise prices for options exercisable$32.51–$60.43$32.51–$60.43$32.51–$60.43
Number of options exercisable706,489 860,114 1,557,900 
For the fiscal year:   
Range of prices relating to options exercised$37.03–$60.08$36.88-$60.43$35.93-$61.26
    The following table presents certain information regarding stock options outstanding and stock options exercisable at October 2, 2020:
 October 2, 2020
 Options OutstandingOptions Exercisable
Range of Exercise PricesNumberWeighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years)Weighted Average PriceNumberWeighted Average Exercise Price
$32.51 - $37.0336,500 1.63$36.97 36,500 $36.97 
$37.43 - $46.09468,077 4.51$43.08 468,077 $43.08 
$47.11 - $55.13173,537 2.72$53.05 173,537 $53.05 
$60.08 - $80.6328,375 3.35$60.39 28,375 $60.39 
 706,489 3.88$45.91 706,489 $45.91 
The 1999 ODSP and the 1999 SIP allow participants to satisfy the exercise price of stock options by tendering shares of Jacobs common stock that have been owned by the participants for at least six months. Shares so tendered are retired and canceled, and are shown as repurchases of common stock in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity. The weighted average remaining contractual term of options currently exercisable is 3.88 years.
Restricted Stock
The following table presents the number of shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units issued as common stock under the 1999 SIP for the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018:
 For the Years Ended
 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Restricted stock
Restricted stock units (service condition)351,670 318,056 1,087,724 
Restricted stock units (service and performance conditions)202,792 240,068 254,784 
The amount of restricted stock units issued for awards with performance and market conditions in the above table are issued based on performance against the target amount. The number of shares ultimately issued, which could be greater or less than target, will be based on achieving specific performance conditions related to the awards as well as achieving the service condition required for the restricted stock units to vest.
F-37

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The following table presents the number and weighted average grant-date fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock units at October 2, 2020:
Number of SharesWeighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Outstanding at September 27, 20191,723,037 $65.80 
Granted728,478 $85.61 
Vested(850,054)$60.37 
Canceled(75,935)$75.86 
Outstanding at October 2, 20201,525,526 $77.88 
The following table presents the number of shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units canceled and withheld for taxes under the 1999 SIP for the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018:
 For the Years Ended
 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Restricted stock34,417 105,301 284,254 
Restricted stock units (service condition)183,099 295,122 336,516 
Restricted stock units (service, market and performance conditions)160,781 183,654 95,063 
The amount of unvested restricted stock units canceled for awards with service and performance conditions in the above table is based on the service period achieved and performance against the target amount.
The restrictions attached to restricted stock and restricted stock units generally relate to the recipient’s ability to sell or otherwise transfer the stock or stock units. There are also restrictions that subject the stock and stock units to forfeiture back to the Company until earned by the recipient through continued employment or service.
The following table provides the number of restricted stock units outstanding at October 2, 2020 under the 1999 SIP. NaN shares of restricted stock were issued under the 1999 ODSP during such periods.
October 2, 2020
Restricted stock
Restricted stock units (service condition)756,054 
Restricted stock units (service, market and performance conditions)647,262 
The following table presents the number of shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units issued under the 1999 ODSP for the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018: 
 For the Years Ended
 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Restricted stock units (service condition)18,100 26,372 21,620 
The following table provides the number of shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units outstanding at October 2, 2020 under the 1999 ODSP:
October 2, 2020
Restricted stock34,000 
Restricted stock units (service condition)88,210 
All shares granted under the 1999 ODSP are issued on a 1.92-to-1.00 basis. 
F-38

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
12.    Savings and Deferred Compensation Plans
Savings Plans
We sponsor various defined contribution savings plans which allow participants to make voluntary contributions by salary deduction. Such plans cover substantially all of our domestic, nonunion employees in the U.S. and are qualified under Section 401(k) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Similar plans outside the U.S. cover various groups of employees of our international subsidiaries and affiliates. Several of these plans allow the Company to match, on a voluntary basis, a portion of the employee contributions. The following table presents the Company’s contributions to these savings plans for the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018 (in thousands):
October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
$91,833 $114,006 $113,135 
Deferred Compensation Plans
Our Executive Security Plan, Executive Deferral Plans, Directors Deferral Plan, legacy CH2M Supplemental Executive Retirement and Retention Plan and legacy CH2M Deferred Compensation Plan are non-qualified deferred compensation programs that provide benefits payable to directors, officers, and certain key employees or their designated beneficiaries at specified future dates, upon retirement, or death. The plans are unfunded; therefore, benefits are paid from the general assets of the Company. Participants' cash deferrals earn a return based on the participants' selection of investments in several hypothetical investment options. Participants are also able to defer stock based compensation in the plans, which must remain invested in Company stock and are distributed in shares of Jacobs common stock. Since no investment diversification is permitted, changes in the fair value of Jacobs' common stock are not recognized. For the deferred compensation held in company stock, the number of shares needed to settle the liability is included in the denominator in both the basic and diluted earnings per share calculations. The following table presents the amount charged to expense for the Company’s deferred compensation plans for the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018 (in thousands):
October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
$203 $2,395 $4,445 
The following table presents the amount relating to assets held as deferred compensation arrangement investments for the years ended October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019 (in thousands):
 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019
Deferred compensation arrangement investments$194,933$219,948
Deferred compensation arrangement investments are comprised of the cash surrender value of life insurance policies and pooled-investment funds. The fair value of the pooled investment funds is derived using Level 2 inputs.

F-39

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
13.    Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
Company-Only Sponsored Plans
We sponsor various defined benefit pension and other post retirement plans covering employees of certain U.S. and international subsidiaries. The pension plans provide pension benefits that are based on the employee’s compensation and years of service. Our funding policy varies by country and plan according to applicable local funding requirements and plan-specific funding agreements.
The accounting for pension and other post-retirement benefit plans requires the use of assumptions and estimates in order to calculate periodic benefit cost and the value of the plans’ assets and benefit obligations. These assumptions include discount rates, investment returns, and projected salary increases, among others. The discount rates used in valuing the plans' benefit obligations were determined with reference to high quality corporate and government bonds that are appropriately matched to the duration of each plan's obligations. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is generally based on using country-specific simulation models which select a single outcome for expected return based on the target asset allocation. The expected long-term rates of return used in the valuation are the annual average returns generated by these assumptions over a 20-year period for each asset class based on the expected long-term rate of return of the underlying assets.
 As a result of the ECR sale, ECR-related pension assets and liabilities that have been sold are reported as discontinued operations in accordance with ASC 210-05, Discontinued Operations. Activity for the year ended September 27, 2019 is shown in the appropriate rows and the balances as of the sale date are shown in the Disposition of ECR Plans rows below.
The following table sets forth the changes in the plans’ combined net benefit obligation (segregated between plans existing within and outside the U.S.) for the years ended October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019 (in thousands):
 U.S. PlansNon-U.S. Plans
 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019October 2, 2020September 27, 2019
Net benefit obligation at the beginning of the year$448,540 $448,402 $2,258,129 $2,149,246 
Service cost409 2,784 5,710 7,171 
Interest cost12,673 16,697 39,469 52,627 
Participants’ contributions243 167 367 
Actuarial (gains)/losses15,584 52,720 35,626 314,889 
Benefits paid(22,836)(30,648)(64,395)(72,453)
Curtailments/settlements/plan amendments(16,450)(39,388)(4,782)30,124 
Disposition of ECR Plans(99,504)
Effect of exchange rate changes and other, net(2,270)118,153 (124,338)
Net benefit obligation at the end of the year$437,920 $448,540 $2,388,077 $2,258,129 
The following table sets forth the changes in the combined Fair Value of the plans’ assets (segregated between plans existing within and outside the U.S.) for the years ended October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019 (in thousands):
F-40

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
 U.S. PlansNon-U.S. Plans
 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019October 2, 2020September 27, 2019
Fair value of plan assets at the beginning of the year$390,210 $390,829 $1,916,637 $1,867,481 
Actual return on plan assets33,345 31,140 61,221 280,785 
Employer contributions88 10,668 33,192 32,063 
Participants’ contributions243 167 367 
Gross benefits paid(22,836)(30,648)(64,395)(72,453)
Curtailments/settlements/plan amendments(18,557)(9,751)(4,782)(5,814)
Disposition of ECR Plans(76,111)
Effect of exchange rate changes and other, net(2,271)101,316 (109,681)
Fair value of plan assets at the end of the year$382,250 $390,210 $2,043,356 $1,916,637 
During fiscal 2020, the Company incurred combined curtailment and settlement losses on our defined benefit plans of approximately $4.6 million primarily related to the Ireland and U.S. plans. During fiscal 2019, the Company incurred combined curtailment and settlement gains on its defined benefit plans of approximately $33.1 million primarily related to the CH2M retiree medical (further discussed below) and Ireland plans.
The following table reconciles the combined funded statuses of the plans recognized in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 29, 2017October 2, 2020 and September 30, 201627, 2019 (segregated between plans existing within and outside the U.S.) (in thousands):

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

Liabilities relating to defined benefit pension and early

   retirement plans

 

$

254,483

 

 

$

402,955

 

Liabilities relating to nonqualified deferred compensation

   Arrangements

 

 

114,616

 

 

 

123,926

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

177,765

 

 

 

156,494

 

Miscellaneous

 

 

185,417

 

 

 

178,449

 

Total

 

$

732,281

 

 

$

861,824

 

 U.S. PlansNon-U.S. Plans
 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019October 2, 2020September 27, 2019
Net benefit obligation at the end of the year$437,920 $448,540 $2,388,077 $2,258,129 
Fair value of plan assets at the end of the year382,250 390,210 2,043,356 1,916,637 
Underfunded amount recognized at the end of the year$55,670 $58,330 $344,721 $341,492 

F-45

The following table presents the accumulated benefit obligation at October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019 (segregated between plans existing within and outside the U.S.) (in thousands):
 U.S. PlansNon-U.S. Plans
 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019October 2, 2020September 27, 2019
Accumulated benefit obligation at the end of the year$436,770 $447,609 $2,376,059 $2,244,710 
The following table presents the amounts recognized in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019 (segregated between plans existing within and outside the U.S.) (in thousands): 
 U.S. PlansNon-U.S. Plans
 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019October 2, 2020September 27, 2019
Prepaid benefit cost included in noncurrent assets$$$1,037 $2,939 
Accrued benefit cost included in current liabilities85 85 4,375 4,177 
Accrued benefit cost included in noncurrent liabilities57,919 58,245 339,049 340,254 
Net amount recognized at the end of the year$58,004 $58,330 $342,387 $341,492 
F-41

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The following table presents the significant actuarial assumptions used in determining the funded statuses and the following year's benefit cost of the Company’s U.S. plans for the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018:
 For the Years Ended
 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Discount rates2.0% to 2.7%2.8% to 3.1%3.9% to 4.2%
Rates of compensation increases3.5%3.5%3.5%
Expected long-term rates of return on assets4.6% to 4.7%5.1%5.8% to 5.9%
The following table presents the significant actuarial assumptions used in determining the funded statuses and the following year's benefit cost of the Company’s non-U.S. plans for the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018:
For the Years Ended
October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Discount rates0.4% to 6.6%0.2% to 7.1%1.3% to 8.1%
Rates of compensation increases2.7% to 7.5%3.7% to 7.5%3.8% to 7.5%
Expected long-term rates of return on assets1.8% to 7.0%2.3% to 7.5%3.8% to 7.5%
The following table presents certain amounts relating to our U.S. plans recognized in accumulated other comprehensive (gain) loss at October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018 (in thousands):
 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Arising during the period:   
Net actuarial (gain) loss$(900)$36,108 $(7,514)
Prior service cost (benefit)1,5890
Total68936,108(7,514)
Reclassification adjustments:   
Net actuarial losses(2,653)(2,282)(2,913)
Prior service cost (benefit)(244)
Total(2,897)(2,282)(2,913)
Total$(2,208)$33,826 $(10,427)
The following table presents certain amounts relating to our non-U.S. plans recognized in accumulated other comprehensive (gain) loss at October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018 (in thousands):
 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Arising during the period:   
Net actuarial (gain) loss$71,676 $83,368 $59,827 
Net (gain) loss on Sale of ECR(12,520)
Prior service cost (benefit)29,829 215 
Total71,676 100,677 60,042 
Reclassification adjustments:   
Net actuarial losses(6,322)(6,546)(5,507)
Prior service cost(1,169)(1,075)181 
Total(7,491)(7,621)(5,326)
Total$64,185 $93,056 $54,716 
F-42

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The following table presents certain amounts relating to our plans recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss that have not yet been recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost at October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019 (segregated between U.S. and non-U.S. plans) (in thousands):
 U.S. PlansNon-U.S. Plans
 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019October 2, 2020September 27, 2019
Net actuarial loss$67,530 $71,083 $401,930 $365,661 
Prior service cost1,345 27,921 28,346 
Total$68,875 $71,083 $429,851 $394,007 
The following table presents the amount of accumulated comprehensive income that will be amortized against earnings as part of our net periodic benefit cost in fiscal 2021 based on 2020 exchange rates (segregated between U.S. and non-U.S. plans) (in thousands):
 U.S. PlansNon-U.S. Plans
Unrecognized net actuarial loss$4,249 $10,016 
Unrecognized prior service cost431 1,431 
Accumulated comprehensive loss to be recorded against earnings$4,680 $11,447 
We consider various factors in developing the estimates for the expected, long-term rates of return on plan assets. These factors include the projected, long-term rates of returns on the various types of assets in which the plans invest, as well as historical returns. In general, investment allocations are determined by each plan’s trustees and/or investment committees. The objectives of the plans’ investment policies are to (i) maximize returns while preserving capital; (ii) provide returns sufficient to meet the current and long-term obligations of the plan as the obligations become due; and (iii) maintain a diversified portfolio of assets so as to reduce the risk associated with having a disproportionate amount of the plans’ total assets invested in any one type of asset, issuer or geography. None of our pension plans hold Jacobs common stock directly (although some plans may hold shares indirectly through investments in mutual funds). The plans’ weighted average asset allocations at October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019 (the measurement dates used in valuing the plans’ assets and liabilities) were as follows:
 U.S. PlansNon-U.S. Plans
 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019October 2, 2020September 27, 2019
Equity securities%%21 %20 %
Debt securities58 %58 %56 %52 %
Real estate investments%%%%
Other39 %39 %17 %21 %
The following table presents the Fair Value of the Company’s Domestic U.S. plan assets at October 2, 2020, segregated by level of Fair Value measurement inputs within the Fair Value hierarchy promulgated by U.S. GAAP (in thousands):
 October 2, 2020
 Fair Value, Determined Using Fair Value Measurement Inputs
 Level 1Level 2Level 3Investments measured at Net Asset ValueTotal
Domestic equities$12,376 $$$$12,376 
Domestic bonds68,324 131,534 199,858 
Overseas bonds19,223 19,223 
Cash and equivalents18,226 18,226 
Mutual funds132,567 132,567 
Total$231,493 $150,757 $$$382,250 
F-43

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The following table presents the Fair Value of the Company’s non-U.S. plan assets at October 2, 2020, segregated by level of Fair Value measurement inputs within the Fair Value hierarchy promulgated by U.S. GAAP (in thousands):
 October 2, 2020
 Fair Value, Determined Using Fair Value Measurement Inputs
 Level 1Level 2Level 3Investments measured at Net Asset ValueTotal
Domestic equities$$103,036 $$5,745 $108,781 
Overseas equities229,576 87,725 317,301 
Domestic bonds34,469 1,175 35,644 
Overseas bonds1,049,119 58,493 1,107,612 
Cash and equivalents24,568 24,568 
Real estate10,383 105,422 115,805 
Insurance contracts4,402 67,709 17,909 90,020 
Hedge funds171,730 7,153 178,883 
Mutual funds64,742 64,742 
Total$24,568 $1,495,727 $344,861 $178,200 $2,043,356 

The following table presents the Fair Value of the Company’s U.S. plan assets at September 27, 2019, segregated by level of Fair Value measurement inputs within the Fair Value hierarchy promulgated by U.S. GAAP (in thousands):
 September 27, 2019
 Fair Value, Determined Using Fair Value Measurement Inputs
 Level 1Level 2Level 3Investments measured at Net Asset ValueTotal
Domestic equities$10,890 $$$$10,890 
Domestic bonds65,490 134,594 200,084 
Overseas bonds20,020 20,020 
Cash and equivalents28,972 28,972 
Mutual funds130,244 130,244 
Total$235,596 $154,614 $$$390,210 
The following table presents the Fair Value of the Company’s non-U.S. plan assets at September 27, 2019, segregated by level of Fair Value measurement inputs within the Fair Value hierarchy promulgated by U.S. GAAP (in thousands):
F-44

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
 September 27, 2019
 Fair Value, Determined Using Fair Value Measurement Inputs
 Level 1Level 2Level 3Investments measured at Net Asset ValueTotal
Domestic equities$$17,255 $$19,413 $36,668 
Overseas equities182,600 50,127 232,727 
Domestic bonds306,225 34,408 340,633 
Overseas bonds728,616 39,292 767,908 
Cash and equivalents37,811 (16)37,795 
Real estate24,735 97,539 15,198 137,472 
Insurance contracts4,478 72,788 77,266 
Derivatives
Hedge funds130,200 7,156 137,356 
Mutual funds148,812 148,812 
Total$37,811 $1,412,705 $300,527 $165,594 $1,916,637 
The following table summarizes the changes in the Fair Value of the Company’s non-U.S. Pension Plans’ Level 3 assets for the years ended September 27, 2019 and October 2, 2020 (in thousands):
 Real EstateInsurance ContractsHedge Funds
Balance at Balance at September 28, 2018$99,587 $95,782 $135,786 
Purchases, sales, and settlements(17,902)(5,126)(26,591)
Realized and unrealized gains21,838 9,134 29,161 
Disposition of ECR Assets(22,885)
Effect of exchange rate changes(5,984)(4,117)(8,156)
Balance at September 27, 2019$97,539 $72,788 $130,200 
Purchases, sales, and settlements(475)(7,375)29,999 
Realized and unrealized gains (losses)3,337 (1,399)5,435 
Effect of exchange rate changes5,021 3,695 6,096 
Balance at October 2, 2020$105,422 $67,709 $171,730 
The following table presents the amount of cash contributions we anticipate making into the plans during fiscal 2021 (in thousands):  
 U.S. PlansNon-U.S. Plans
Anticipated cash contributions$$31,258 
The following table presents the total benefit payments expected to be paid to plan participants during each of the next five fiscal years, and in total for the five years thereafter (in thousands):
 U.S. PlansNon-U.S. Pans
2021$34,757 $70,264 
202232,690 69,594 
202332,022 71,386 
202430,710 72,131 
202529,312 73,217 
For the periods 2026 through 2030129,516 406,156 
F-45

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The following table presents the components of “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” shownnet periodic benefit cost for the Company’s U.S. plans recognized in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets atStatements of Earnings for the years ended October 2, 2020, September 29, 2017,27, 2019 and September 30, 201628, 2018 (in thousands):

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

$

(386,131

)

 

$

(245,603

)

Adjustments relating to defined benefit pension plans

 

 

(265,578

)

 

 

(364,625

)

Other

 

 

(1,805

)

 

 

(366

)

Total

 

$

(653,514

)

 

$

(610,594

)

 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Service cost$409 $2,784 $4,765 
Interest cost12,673 16,697 13,778 
Expected return on plan assets(17,670)(21,508)(19,663)
Actuarial loss3,518 3,026 3,845 
Prior service cost323 
Net pension cost, before special items$(747)$999 $2,725 
Curtailment expense/Settlement (gain) loss3,436 (35,020)4,146 
Total net periodic pension cost recognized$2,689 $(34,021)$6,871 

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

During fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016, the Company acquired businesses for cash of $150.2 million and cash and stock of $49.9 million, respectively.

The following table presents the non-cash adjustments relating to these acquisitions madecomponents of net periodic benefit cost for the Company’s Non-U.S. plans recognized in preparing the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018 (in thousands):
 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Service cost$5,710 $7,171 $8,269 
Interest cost39,469 52,627 49,324 
Expected return on plan assets(93,407)(82,274)(83,328)
Actuarial loss7,578 7,854 6,655 
Prior service cost1,405 1,263 (257)
Net pension cost, before special items$(39,245)$(13,359)$(19,337)
Curtailment expense/Settlement (gain) loss1,341 1,933 1,268 
Total net periodic pension (income) cost recognized$(37,904)$(11,426)$(18,069)
Total net periodic pension (income) cost recognized from Discontinued Operations$$2,282 $3,606 
Total net periodic pension (income) cost recognized from Continuing Operations$(37,904)$(13,708)$(21,675)

As a result of the adoption of ASU 2017-07, Compensation- Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, the service cost component of net periodic pension expense has been presented in the same line item as other compensation costs (direct cost of contracts and selling, general and administrative expenses) and the other components of net periodic pension expense have been reclassified from selling, general and administrative expense and direct cost of contracts and instead presented in miscellaneous income (expense), net on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the year ended September 28, 2018 in the amount of $24.2 million.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2019, the Company elected to discontinue the CH2M Hill Retiree Medical Plan and the OMI Retiree Medical Plan, effective December 31, 2018. Lump sum payments were made to participants in fiscal 2019, resulting in a plan settlement and related settlement gain of $35.0 million recognized in fiscal 2019.
On January 1, 2019, the CH2M Hill Pension Plan and the CH2M Hill IDC Pension Plan merged into the Company's Sverdrup Pension Plan. The newly combined plan is called the Jacobs Consolidated Pension Plan.
Due to a ruling by the High Court in the United Kingdom regarding equalization between men and women of a tranche of pension (the Guaranteed Minimum Pension) accrued between 1990 and 1997, Jacobs measured the estimated impact of this ruling in its consolidated financial statements, resulting in an increase of approximately $38.2 million in the ASC 715 balance sheet liability in fiscal 2019, with an offset to other comprehensive income, net of tax. Additionally, the Company recognized an additional $1.5 million in additional net periodic benefit cost during the year ended September 27, 2019 as a result of the ruling.
F-46

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Multiemployer Plans
In the U.S. and various other countries, we contribute to trusteed pension plans covering hourly and certain salaried employees under industry-wide agreements. Contributions are based on the hours worked by employees covered under these agreements and are charged to direct costs of contracts on a current basis.
The majority of the contributions the Company makes to multiemployer pension plans are outside the U.S. With respect to these multiemployer plans, the Company's liability to fund these plans is generally limited to the contributions we are required to make under collective bargaining agreements.
Based on our review of our multiemployer pension plans under the guidance provided in ASU 2011-09— Compensation-Retirement Benefits-Multiemployer Plans, we have concluded that none of the multiemployer pension plans into which we contribute are individually significant to our Consolidated Financial Statements. Additionally, in fiscal year 2019, all Canadian and some US and European multiemployer plans were sold in connection with the ECR sale, which resulted in a year over year decrease in contributions made.
The following table presents the Company’s contributions to these multiemployer plans for the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018 (in thousands):
 October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Canada$$16,625 $36,354 
Europe1,922 9,413 10,677 
United States6,637 7,149 9,536 
Contributions to multiemployer pension plans$8,559 $33,187 $56,567 

F-47

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
14.    Business Combinations
John Wood Group's Nuclear Business
On March 6, 2020, a subsidiary of Jacobs completed the acquisition of the nuclear consulting, remediation and program management business of John Wood Group, a U.K.-based energy services company, for an enterprise value of £246 million, or approximately $317.9 million, less cash acquired of $24.3 million, as updated for additional working capital adjustments. The John Wood Group nuclear business allows Jacobs to further expand its lifecycle nuclear services business. The following summarizes the fair values of John Wood Group's assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date (in millions):     
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents$24.3 
Receivables75.9 
Other current assets5.2 
Property, equipment and improvements, net8.3 
Goodwill205.8 
Identifiable intangible assets80.0 
Miscellaneous19.4 
Total Assets$418.9 
Liabilities
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities$71.8 
Long term liabilities29.2 
Total Liabilities101.0
Net assets acquired$317.9 

The purchase price allocation is based upon preliminary information and is subject to change when additional information is obtained. Goodwill recognized results from a substantial assembled workforce, which does not qualify for separate recognition, as well as expected future synergies from combining operations. None of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The Company has not completed its final assessment of the fair values of John Wood Group's assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The final purchase price allocation could result in adjustments to certain assets and liabilities, including the residual amount allocated to goodwill. 
Identified intangibles include customer relationships, contracts and backlog and developed technology. The customer relationships, contracts and backlog intangible represents the fair value of existing contracts, underlying customer relationships and backlog. The customer relationships, contracts and backlog intangible and the developed technology intangible have lives of 12 and 15 years, respectively.
Fair value measurements relating to the John Wood Group nuclear business are made primarily using Level 3 inputs including discounted cash flow techniques. Fair value is estimated using inputs primarily for the income approach, which include the use of both the multiple period excess earnings method and the relief from royalties method. The significant assumptions used in estimating fair value include (i) the estimated life the asset will contribute to cash flows, such as attrition rate of customers or remaining contractual terms, (ii) profitability and (iii) the estimated discount rate that reflects the level of risk associated with receiving future cash flows. Other personal property assets, such as furniture, fixtures and equipment, are valued using the cost approach, which is based on replacement or reproduction costs of the asset less depreciation.
No summarized unaudited pro forma results are provided for the John Wood Group nuclear business due to the immateriality of this acquisition relative to the Company's consolidated financial position and results of operations.
F-48

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
KeyW
On June 12, 2019, Jacobs completed the acquisition of The KeyW Holding Corporation (“KeyW”), a U.S. based national security solutions provider to the intelligence, cyber, and counterterrorism communities by acquiring 100% of the outstanding shares of KeyW common stock (the "KeyW acquisition"). The KeyW acquisition allows Jacobs to further expand its government services business. The Company paid total consideration of $902.6 million which was comprised of approximately $604.2 million in cash to the former stockholders and certain equity award holders of KeyW and the assumption of KeyW’s debt of $298.4 million. The Company repaid all of KeyW's debt by the end of the fourth fiscal quarter of 2019.
The following summarizes the fair values of KeyW assets and acquired liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date (in millions):
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents$29.1 
Receivables79.1 
Inventories, net19.3 
Prepaid expenses and other2.4 
Property, equipment and improvements, net24.5 
Deferred tax asset and other37.8 
Goodwill615.6 
Identifiable intangible assets179.0 
Total Assets$986.8 
Liabilities
Accounts payable$8.3 
Accrued expenses69.1 
Short term debt298.4 
Other current liabilities3.9 
Other non-current liabilities2.9 
Total Liabilities382.6 
Net assets acquired$604.2 
Goodwill recognized results from a substantial assembled workforce, which does not qualify for separate recognition, as well as expected future synergies from combining operations. Goodwill of $136.3 million is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The Company has completed its final assessment of the fair values of the acquired assets and liabilities of KeyW. Since the initial preliminary estimates reported in the third quarter of fiscal 2019, the Company has updated certain amounts reflected in the final purchase price allocation, as summarized in the fair values of KeyW assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date as set forth above.

Identified intangibles include customer relationships, contracts and backlog and developed technology. The customer relationships, contracts and backlog intangible represents the fair value of existing contracts, underlying customer relationships and backlog. The customer relationships, contracts and backlog intangible, and the developed technology intangible have lives of 10 and 12 years, respectively. Other intangible liabilities consist of the fair value of office leases and have a weighted average life of approximately 9 years.

Fair value measurements relating to the KeyW acquisition are made primarily using Level 3 inputs including discounted cash flow techniques. Fair value is estimated using inputs primarily for the income approach, which include the use of both the multiple period excess earnings method and the relief from royalties method. The significant assumptions used in estimating fair value include (i) the estimated life the asset will contribute to cash flows, such as attrition rate of customers or remaining contractual terms, (ii) profitability and (iii) the estimated discount rate that reflects the level of risk associated with receiving future cash flows. Other personal property assets, such as furniture, fixtures and equipment, are valued using the cost approach, which is based on replacement or reproduction costs of the asset less depreciation.

F-49

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
For purposes of our comparative fiscal 2020 and 2019 reporting requirements in this Form 10-K, the following presents summarized unaudited pro forma operating results of the Company for the year ended September 27, 2019 assuming that the June 12, 2019 acquisition of KeyW had occurred at the beginning of fiscal 2018 for pro forma purposes. These pro forma operating results are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not indicative of the operating results that would have been achieved had the related events occurred on such date (in millions, except per share data):
For the Year Ended
September 27, 2019
Revenues$13,068.7 
Net earnings of the Group from Continuing Operations$326.0 
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Jacobs from continuing operations$303.0 
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Jacobs from continuing operations per share:
Basic earnings (loss) from continuing operations per share$2.19 
Diluted earnings (loss) from continuing operations per share$2.17 
Included in the table above are the unaudited pro forma operating results of continuing operations. Also, income tax expense (benefit) for the fiscal year pro forma period ended September 27, 2019 was $41.3 million.
CH2M
On December 15, 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of CH2M HILL Companies, Ltd. ("CH2M"), an international provider of engineering, construction and technical services, by acquiring 100% of the outstanding shares of CH2M common stock and preferred stock (the "CH2M acquisition"). The purpose of the CH2M acquisition was to further diversify the Company’s presence in the water, nuclear and environmental remediation sectors and to further the Company’s profitable growth strategy. The Company paid total consideration of approximately $1.8 billion in cash (excluding $315.2 million of cash acquired) and issued approximately $1.4 billion of Jacobs’ common stock, or 20.7 million shares, to the former stockholders and certain equity award holders of CH2M. In connection with the CH2M acquisition, the Company also assumed CH2M’s revolving credit facility and second lien notes, including a $20.0 million prepayment penalty, which totaled approximately $700 million of long-term debt. Immediately following the effective time of the CH2M acquisition, the Company repaid CH2M’s revolving credit facility and second lien notes including the related prepayment penalty.
The following summarizes the estimated fair values of CH2M assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date (in millions):
F-50

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents$315.2 
Receivables1,120.6 
Prepaid expenses and other72.7 
Property, equipment and improvements, net175.1 
Goodwill3,165.5 
Identifiable intangible assets:
Customer relationships, contracts and backlog412.3 
Lease intangible assets4.4 
Total identifiable intangible assets416.7 
Miscellaneous530.8 
Total Assets$5,796.6 
Liabilities
Notes payable$2.2 
Accounts payable309.6 
Accrued liabilities787.4 
Contract liabilities260.8 
Identifiable intangible liabilities:
Lease intangible liabilities9.6 
Long-term debt706.0 
Other deferred liabilities659.0 
Total Liabilities$2,734.6 
Noncontrolling interests(37.3)
Net assets acquired$3,024.7 
Goodwill recognized results from a substantial assembled workforce, which does not qualify for separate recognition, as well as expected future synergies from combining operations. NaN of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. During the first quarter of fiscal 2019, the Company completed its final assessment of the fair values of the acquired assets and liabilities of CH2M. Accrued liabilities and other deferred liabilities include approximately $404.7 million related to estimates for various legal and other pre-acquisition contingent liabilities accounted for under ASC 450. See Note 18- Contractual Guarantees, Litigation, Investigations and Insurance relating to CH2M contingencies.
Customer relationships, contracts and backlog represent the fair value of existing contracts, the underlying customer relationships and backlog of consolidated subsidiaries and have lives ranging from 9 to 11 years (weighted average life of approximately 10 years). Other intangible assets and liabilities primarily consist of the fair value of office leases and have a weighted average life of approximately 10 years.
Fair value measurements relating to the CH2M acquisition are made using Level 3 inputs including discounted cash flow techniques. Fair value is estimated using inputs primarily from the income approach, which include the use of both the multiple period excess earnings method and the relief from royalties method. The significant assumptions used in estimating fair value include (i) the estimated life the asset will contribute to cash flows, such as attrition rate of customers or remaining contractual terms, (ii) profitability and (iii) the estimated discount rate that reflect the level of risk associated with receiving future cash flows. The estimated fair value of land has been determined using the market approach, which arrives at an indication of value by comparing the site being valued to sites that have been recently acquired in arm’s-length transactions. Personal property assets with an active and identifiable secondary market are valued using the market approach. Buildings and land improvements are valued using the cost approach using a direct cost model built on estimates of replacement cost. Other personal property assets such as furniture, fixtures and equipment are valued using the cost approach which is based on replacement or reproduction costs of the asset less depreciation.
F-51

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
From the acquisition date of December 15, 2017 through September 28, 2018, CH2M consolidated, including both continuing and discontinued operations, contributed approximately $3.8 billion in revenue and $185.9 million in pretax income included in the accompanying consolidated statement of earnings. Included in these results were approximately $99.3 million in pre-tax restructuring and transaction costs.
Transaction costs associated with the CH2M acquisition in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings for the year ended September 28, 2018 are comprised of the following (in millions):
For the Year Ended
September 28, 2018
Personnel costs$50.2 
Professional services and other expenses27.5 
Total$77.7 
    Personnel costs above include change of control payments and related severance costs.
    The following presents summarized unaudited pro forma operating results assuming that the Company had acquired CH2M at October 1, 2016. These pro forma operating results are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not indicative of the operating results that would have been achieved had the related events occurred (in millions). Additionally, these pro forma operating results have not been recast for the sale of our ECR business.
For the Year Ended
September 28, 2018
Revenues$16,012.4 
Net earnings$196.3 
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Jacobs$184.5 
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Jacobs per share:
Basic earnings (loss) per share$1.28 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share$1.27 
Included in the unaudited pro forma operating results are charges relating to transaction expenses, severance expense and other items that are removed from the year ended September 28, 2018 and are reflected in the year ended September 29, 2017 due to the assumed timing of the transaction. Also, income tax expense (benefit) for the twelve- month pro forma period ended September 28, 2018 was $409.7 million.
15.     Sale of Energy, Chemicals and Resources ("ECR") Business
    On April 26, 2019, Jacobs completed the sale of its ECR business to Worley for a purchase price of $3.4 billion consisting of (i) $2.8 billion in cash plus (ii) 58.2 million ordinary shares of Worley, subject to adjustments for changes in working capital and certain other items (the “ECR sale”). The stock and asset purchase agreement for the ECR sale contained a restriction on our ability to sell the Worley shares received in the transaction, which expired in the first fiscal quarter of 2020.
Discontinued Operations
    As a result of the ECR sale, substantially all ECR-related assets and liabilities have been sold (the "Disposal Group"). We determined that the Disposal Group should be reported as discontinued operations in accordance with ASC 210-05, Discontinued Operations because their disposal represents a strategic shift that had a major effect on our operations and financial results. As such, the financial results of the ECR business are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings as discontinued operations for all periods presented. As of the year ended October 2, 2020, all of the ECR business to be sold under the terms of the sale has been conveyed to Worley and as such, no amounts remain held for sale.
F-52

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Summarized Financial Information of Discontinued Operations
    The following table represents earnings (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax (in thousands):
For the Years Ended (1)
October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Revenues$11,235 $2,725,699 $4,404,873 
Direct cost of contracts(6,152)(2,338,113)(3,756,263)
Gross profit5,083 387,586 648,610 
Selling, general and administrative expenses32,668 (320,264)(412,282)
Operating Profit (Loss)37,751 67,322 236,328 
Gain on sale of ECR business110,236 935,110 
Other (expense) income, net515 (47,390)(12,604)
Earnings Before Taxes from Discontinued Operations148,502 955,042 223,724 
Income Tax Expense(10,518)(395,828)(55,931)
Net Earnings of the Group from Discontinued Operations$137,984 $559,214 $167,793 
(1)     The ECR business was sold April 26, 2019, therefore the year ended September 27, 2019 includes only seven months of results.

    Selling, general and administrative expenses includes a reduction for net insurance recoveries of approximately $40.0 million for the year ended October 2, 2020 recorded in connection with the Nui Phao ("NPMC") legal matter described in Note 18- Contractual Guarantees, Litigations, Investigations and Insurance. Additionally, the year ended September 27, 2019 includes a charge for the award and recovery of costs, estimated related interest and attorneys' fees related to the NPMC legal matter. For the year ended October 2, 2020, the gain on sale of $110.2 million relates mainly to the recognition of the deferred gain for the delayed transfer of the ECR-related assets and liabilities of the two international entities discussed below, adjustments for working capital and certain other items in connection with the ECR sale and additional income for the release of a deferred gain upon achievement of the IT Migration Date described below in connection with the delivery to Worley of certain IT application and hardware assets related to the ECR business. For the year ended September 27, 2019, other expense (income), net was comprised of $35.0 million in interest expense relating to the Nui Phao settlement, $6.0 million in foreign currency revaluations, $9.6 million in loss on the sale of a joint venture which is offset by $4.4 million in miscellaneous income. For the year ended September 28, 2018, other expense (income), net was comprised of an approximate $21.0 million loss on the sale of the Guimar joint venture, offset by $8.4 million in miscellaneous income.
The following tables represent the assets and liabilities held for sale (in thousands):
September 27, 2019
Cash and cash equivalents$
Receivables and contract assets871 
Prepaid expenses and other81 
Current assets held for sale (1)$952 

Property, Equipment and Improvements, net$1,643 
Goodwill24,896 
Intangibles, net
Miscellaneous439 
Noncurrent assets held for sale (1)$26,978 

F-53

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Notes payable$
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities2,495 
Contract liabilities78 
Current liabilities held for sale (1)$2,573 
(1)At September 27, 2019, current assets held for sale and noncurrent assets held for sale were included in the within prepaid expenses and other and miscellaneous, respectively. At September 27, 2019, current liabilities held for sale and noncurrent liabilities held for sale were included within accrued liabilities and other deferred liabilities, respectively.
The significant components included in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for discontinued operations are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

Working capital

 

$

9,121

 

 

$

10,023

 

Property and equipment

 

 

912

 

 

 

879

 

Noncurrent assets

 

 

35,976

 

 

 

8,192

 

Deferred liabilities

 

 

(273

)

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

 

104,454

 

 

 

30,849

 

For the Year Ended
September 27, 2019
Depreciation and amortization:
Property, equipment and improvements$2,110 
Intangible assets$614 
Additions to property and equipment$(9,204)
Stock based compensation$10,852 

15. Segment Information


Gain on Sale and Deferred Gain
    As a result of the ECR sale, the Company recognized a pre-tax gain of $1.0 billion, $935.1 million of which was recognized in fiscal 2019 and $110.2 million of which is included in Net Earnings of the Group from Discontinued Operations on the consolidated statement of earnings for the year ended October 2, 2020, which is further discussed below.
    Upon closing the ECR sale, the Company retained a noncontrolling interest (with significant influence) in P&PS-related activities in one international legal entity acquired by Worley. The fair value of the Company’s retained interest in the net assets and liabilities of this entity was estimated at $33.0 million and recorded at closing. For another international legal entity, the closing and transfer of ECR-related assets to Worley were set to occur at a future date. At the time of the ECR sale, the Company allocated proceeds received to these deferred closing items on a relative fair value basis and recognized a deferred gain of $34.4 million. During the second fiscal quarter of 2016,2020, the delayed transfer of the ECR-related assets and liabilities of these two international entities occurred, and as a result, previously deferred gain amounts were recognized.
    In addition to consideration received for the sale of the ECR business, the proceeds received included advanced consideration for the Company to deliver IT application and related hardware assets at a future date (“IT Migration Date”) to Worley upon completion of the interim transition services provided under the TSA, described further below. This deliverable of IT assets is considered to be a separate element of the ECR business sale transaction, and accordingly, we reorganizedhave allocated a portion of the proceeds received of $95.3 million on a relative fair value basis to this separate deliverable and recognized deferred income. Upon completion and acceptance of this deliverable by Worley in December 2019, the deferred proceeds were recognized in earnings from discontinued operations, along with expenses associated with any costs incurred and deferred by the Company for this deliverable.
Investment in Worley Stock
    As discussed above, the Company received 58.2 million in ordinary shares of Worley in connection with the ECR sale. Pursuant to the purchase agreement for the ECR sale, 51.4 million of the shares were considered "restricted" during a lock-up period ending in December 2019. During the lock-up period, Jacobs could not, without Worley's consent, directly or indirectly dispose of the "restricted" shares. The remaining 6.8 million shares not considered "restricted" were sold in fiscal 2019, netting a loss of $4.9 million, which was recognized in miscellaneous income (expense), net. Dividend income and unrealized gains and losses on changes in fair value of Worley shares are recognized in miscellaneous income (expense), net in continuing operations.
F-54

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
    The Company's investment in Worley is measured at fair value through net income as it is an equity investment with a readily determinable fair value based on quoted market prices. The 51.4 million ordinary shares currently held are recorded within investment in equity securities in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets at their estimated fair value, which is $347.5 million as of October 2, 2020 and $451.1 million as of September 27, 2019. For the years ended October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019, the Company recognized a loss of $103.6 million and a loss of $78.1 million, respectively, associated with share price and currency changes on this investment, as well as dividend income related to the equity investment in the amount of $16.9 million and $5.2 million, respectively. Quoted market prices are available for these securities in an active market and therefore categorized as a Level 1 input.
Transition Services Agreement
Upon closing of the ECR sale, the Company entered into a Transition Services Agreement (the "TSA") with Worley pursuant to which the Company, on an interim basis, provided various services to Worley including executive consultation, corporate, information technology, and project services. The initial term of the TSA began immediately following the closing of the ECR sale on April 26, 2019 and expired in April 2020, although the parties mutually agreed to extend certain of the services for additional time periods beyond the initial term. All services under the TSA were terminated in October 2020. Pursuant to the terms of the TSA, the Company received payments for the interim services which approximate costs incurred to perform the services. The Company has recognized costs recorded in SG&A expense incurred to perform the TSA, offset by $15.8 million and $35.4 million in TSA related income for such services that is reported in miscellaneous income (expense) in continuing operations for the year ended October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019, respectively, before inclusion of certain incremental outside service support costs agreed to be shared equally by the parties.
F-55

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
16.     Restructuring and Other Charges
During fiscal 2020, the Company implemented certain restructuring and separation initiatives, including the Company's fourth quarter fiscal 2020 transformation initiatives relating to real estate and other staffing programs. The activities of these initiatives are expected to continue into fiscal 2023.
During fiscal 2019 and continuing into fiscal 2020, the Company implemented certain restructuring and separation initiatives associated with the ECR sale, the KeyW acquisition, and other related cost reduction initiatives. Additionally, in fiscal 2020, the Company implemented certain restructuring and separation initiatives associated with the acquisition of John Wood Group's nuclear business. The restructuring activities and related costs were comprised mainly of separation and lease abandonment and sublease programs, while the separation activities and costs were mainly related to the engagement of consulting services and internal personnel and other related costs dedicated to the Company’s ECR-business separation. The activities of these initiatives are expected to be substantially completed before the end of fiscal 2021.
During the fourth fiscal quarter of 2017, the Company implemented certain restructuring and pre-integration plans associated with the then-pending acquisition of CH2M, which closed on December 15, 2017. The restructuring activities and related costs under these plans were comprised mainly of severance and lease abandonment programs, while the integration activities and costs were mainly related to the engagement of professional services and internal personnel and other related costs dedicated to the Company’s integration management efforts. Following the closing of the CH2M acquisition, these activities have continued through fiscal 2020 and are expected to be substantially completed before the end of fiscal 2022.
Collectively, the above-mentioned restructuring activities are referred to as “Restructuring and other charges”.
    The following table summarizes the impacts of the Restructuring and other charges by LOB in connection with the CH2M, KeyW and John Wood Group nuclear business acquisitions, the ECR sale and the Company's fourth quarter fiscal 2020 transformation initiatives relating to real estate and other staffing programs for the year ended October 2, 2020, the CH2M and KeyW acquisitions and the ECR sale for the year ended September 27, 2019 and the CH2M acquisition for the year ended September 28, 2018 (in thousands):
October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Critical Mission Solutions$24,083 $17,989 20,254 
People & Places Solutions170,631 108,835 56,238 
Corporate129,469 184,646 77,148 
Continuing Operations (1)324,183 311,470 153,640 
Energy, Chemicals and Resources (included in Discontinued Operations)(138)37,166 
Total$324,183 $311,332 $190,806 
(1)For the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018, amounts include $321.6 million, $337.0 million and $154.0 million, respectively, in items impacting operating profit, along with items recorded in other income (expense), net, which are the loss on settlement of the CH2M portion of the U.S. pension plan of $2.1 million for the year ended October 2, 2020, the gain on the settlement of the CH2M retiree medical plans of $35.0 million for the year ended September 27, 2019 and the write-off of fixed assets related to restructured leases of $10 million for the year ended September 27, 2019 and other miscellaneous adjustments of $(0.5) million, $0.5 million and $0.3 million for the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018, respectively. See Note 19- Segment Information.
The activity in the Company’s accrual for the Restructuring and other charges including the program activities described above for the year ended October 2, 2020 is as follows (in thousands):
Balance at September 27, 2019$162,702 
Transfer to lease right-of-use asset as a result of adoption of ASC 842 (1)(116,797)
Net Charges324,183 
Payments & Usage(317,234)
Balance at October 2, 2020$52,854 
(1)In addition, there was $24.6 million in lease cease-use liabilities relating to 2015 restructuring initiatives which were reclassified to ROU asset balances in accordance with the adoption of ASC 842, see Note 10- Leases. The 2015 restructuring initiatives are no longer active and therefore activity associated with lease cease-use liabilities for those initiatives is not included in the table.
F-56

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The following table summarizes the Restructuring and other charges by major type of costs for the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018 (in thousands):
October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Lease Abandonments and Impairments$151,150 $99,976 $61,526 
Voluntary and Involuntary Terminations53,484 33,742 29,056 
Outside Services88,476 133,148 35,987 
Other (1)31,073 44,604 27,071 
Total$324,183 $311,470 $153,640 
(1)Includes $35.0 million in pre-tax gains associated with the Company's CH2M retiree medical plan settlement during the year ended September 27, 2019.
Cumulative amounts since 2017 incurred to date under our various restructuring and other activities described above by each major type of cost as of October 2, 2020 are as follows (in thousands):
Lease Abandonments and Impairments$313,517 
Voluntary and Involuntary Terminations128,969 
Outside Services259,124 
Other (1)100,314 
Total$801,924 
(1)Includes $35.0 million in pre-tax gains associated with the Company's CH2M retiree medical plan settlement during the year ended September 27, 2019.
F-57

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
17.    Commitments and Contingencies and Derivative Financial Instruments
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company is exposed to interest rate risk under its variable rate borrowings and additionally, due to the nature of the Company's international operations, we are at times exposed to foreign currency risk. As such, we sometimes enter into foreign exchange contracts and interest rate contracts in order to limit our exposure to fluctuating foreign currencies and interest rates.
In fiscal 2020 we entered into interest rate swap agreements with a notional value of $783.7 million as of October 2, 2020 to manage the interest rate exposure on our variable rate loans. Additionally, we entered into a cross-currency swap agreement with a notional value of $127.8 million to manage the interest rate and foreign currency exposure on our USD borrowings by a European subsidiary. By entering into the swap agreements, the Company converted the LIBOR rate based liability into a fixed rate liability and, for the cross currency swap, our LIBOR rate based borrowing in USD to a fixed rate Euro liability, for periods ranging from three and a half to ten years. Under the interest rate swap agreements, the Company receives the one month LIBOR rate and pays monthly a fixed rate ranging from .704% to 1.116%, and under the cross currency swap agreement, the Company receives the one month LIBOR rate plus 0.875% in USD and pays monthly a Euro fixed rate of .726% to .746% for the term of the swaps. The swaps were designated as cash-flow hedges in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The fair value of the interest rate and cross currency swaps at October 2, 2020 was $(31.5) million, which is included in other deferred liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. The unrealized net losses on these interest rate and cross currency swaps was $14.6 million, net of tax, and was included in accumulated other comprehensive income as of October 2, 2020.
Additionally, at October 2, 2020, the Company held foreign exchange forward contracts in currencies that support our operations, around fourincluding British Pound, Euro, Australian Dollar and other currencies, with notional values of $393.7 million at October 2, 2020. The length of these contracts currently ranges from one to twelve months. The fair value of the foreign exchange contracts at October 2, 2020 was $53.5 million, which is included in current assets within receivables and contract assets on the consolidated balance sheet and with associated income statement impacts included in miscellaneous income (expense) in the consolidated statement of earnings.
The fair value measurements of these derivatives are being made using Level 2 inputs under ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, as the measurements are based on observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets. We are exposed to risk from credit-related losses resulting from nonperformance by counterparties to our financial instruments. We perform credit evaluations of our counterparties under forward exchange and interest rate contracts and expect all counterparties to meet their obligations. We have not experienced credit losses from our counterparties.
Letters of Credit
At October 2, 2020, the Company had issued and outstanding approximately $263.0 million in LOCs and $2.3 billion in surety bonds. Of the outstanding LOC amount, $2.3 million has been issued under the Revolving Credit Facility and $260.7 million are issued under separate, committed and uncommitted letter-of-credit facilities.
18.    Contractual Guarantees, Litigation, Investigations and Insurance
In the normal course of business, we make contractual commitments some of which are supported by separate guarantees; and on occasion we are a party in a litigation or arbitration proceeding. The litigation or arbitration in which we are involved primarily includes personal injury claims, professional liability claims and breach of contract claims. Where we provide a separate guarantee it is strictly in support of the underlying contractual commitment. Guarantees take various forms including surety bonds required by law, or standby letters of credit ("LOC") (also referred to as “bank guarantees”) or corporate guarantees given to induce a party to enter into a contract with a subsidiary. Standby LOCs are also used as security for advance payments or in various other transactions. The guarantees have various expiration dates ranging from an arbitrary date to completion of our work (e.g., engineering only) to completion of the overall project. See Note 17- Commitments and Contingencies and Derivative Financial Instruments for more information surrounding LOCs and surety bonds.
F-58

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
We maintain insurance coverage for most insurable aspects of our business and operations. Our insurance programs have varying coverage limits depending upon the type of insurance, and include certain conditions and exclusions which insurance companies may raise in response to any claim that the Company brings. We have also elected to retain a portion of losses and liabilities that occur through the use of various deductibles, limits, and retentions under our insurance programs. As a result, we may be subject to a future liability for which we are only partially insured or completely uninsured. We intend to mitigate any such future liability by continuing to exercise prudent business judgment in negotiating the terms and conditions of the contracts which the Company enters with its clients. Our insurers are also subject to business risk and, as a result, one or more of them may be unable to fulfill their insurance obligations due to insolvency or otherwise.
Additionally, as a contractor providing services to the U.S. federal government we are subject to many types of audits, investigations and claims by, or on behalf of, the government including with respect to contract performance, pricing, cost allocations, procurement practices, labor practices and socioeconomic obligations. Furthermore, our income, franchise and similar tax returns and filings are also subject to audit and investigation by the Internal Revenue Service, most states within the U.S., as well as by various government agencies representing jurisdictions outside the U.S.
Our Consolidated Balance Sheets include amounts representing our probable estimated liability relating to such claims, guarantees, litigation, audits and investigations. We perform an analysis to determine the level of reserves to establish for insurance-related claims that are known and have been asserted against us, and for insurance-related claims that are believed to have been incurred based on actuarial analysis, but have not yet been reported to our claims administrators as of the respective balance sheet dates. We include any adjustments to such insurance reserves in our consolidated results of operations. Insurance recoveries are recorded as assets if recovery is probable and estimated liabilities are not reduced by expected insurance recoveries.
The Company believes, after consultation with counsel, that such guarantees, litigation, U.S. government contract-related audits, investigations and claims and income tax audits and investigations should not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements, beyond amounts currently accrued.
On September 30, 2015, Nui Phao Mining Company Limited (“NPMC”) commenced arbitration proceedings against Jacobs E&C Australia Pty Limited (“Jacobs E&C”) in Singapore before the Singapore International Arbitration Centre. Jacobs E&C was engaged by NPMC for the provision of management, design, engineering, and procurement services for a Nui Phao mine/mineral processing project in Vietnam as part of the Company’s former Energy, Chemicals & Resources (“ECR”) line of business. A three-week hearing on the merits concluded on December 15, 2017, and on March 28, 2019, the arbitration panel issued a decision finding against Jacobs E&C. On August 30, 2019, NPMC and Jacobs E&C settled all of the proceedings related to this matter. Under the terms of the settlement, Jacobs E&C made a payment to NPMC in the amount of $130.0 million in the fourth fiscal quarter of 2019. The settlement otherwise remains confidential. During the year ended October 2, 2020, the Company recognized the reduction of $40.0 million of selling, general and administrative expenses in discontinued operations as a result of the realization of related net insurance recoveries. Under the terms of the sale of the Company's ECR business to Worley on April 26, 2019, the Company retained liability with respect to this matter.
In 2012, CH2M HILL Australia Pty Limited, a subsidiary of CH2M, entered into a 50/50 integrated joint venture with Australian construction contractor UGL Infrastructure Pty Limited. The joint venture entered into a Consortium Agreement with General Electric and GE Electrical International Inc. The Consortium was awarded a subcontract by JKC Australia LNG Pty Limited ("JKC") for the engineering, procurement, construction and commissioning of a 360 MW Combined Cycle Power Plant for INPEX Operations Australia Pty Limited at Blaydin Point, Darwin, NT, Australia. In January 2017, the Consortium terminated the Subcontract because of JKC’s repudiatory breach and demobilized from the work site. JKC claimed the Consortium abandoned the work and itself purported to terminate the Subcontract. The Consortium and JKC are now in dispute over the termination. In August 2017, the Consortium filed an International Chamber of Commerce arbitration against JKC and is seeking compensatory damages in the amount of approximately $530.0 million for repudiatory breach or, in the alternative, seeking damages for unresolved contract claims and change orders. JKC is seeking damages in excess of $1.7 billion and has drawn on the bonds. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, a November 2020 date for commencement of the hearing has been vacated and the hearing has been rescheduled for opening arguments in April and the remaining proceedings in July and August 2021. Although an earlier decision is possible, no decision is expected before 2022. In September 2018, JKC filed a declaratory judgment action in Western Australia alleging that the entities which executed parent company guaranties for the Consortium, including CH2M Hill Companies, Ltd., have an obligation to pay JKC’s ongoing costs to complete the project after termination. A hearing on that matter was held in March 2019, and a decision in favor of the Consortium was issued. JKC appealed the decision, a hearing on the
F-59

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
appeal took place in March 2020 and a decision was handed down on July 22, 2020 denying JKC’s appeal in its entirety. If the Consortium is found liable, these matters could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and /or cash flows, particularly in the short term. However, the Consortium has denied liability and is vigorously defending these claims and pursuing its affirmative claims against JKC, and based on the information currently available, the Company does not expect the resolution of this matter to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, in excess of the current reserve for this matter. See Note 14- Business Combinations, for further information related to CH2M contingencies.
On December 22, 2008, a coal fly ash pond at the Kingston Power Plant of the Tennessee Valley Authority ("TVA") was breached, releasing fly ash waste into the Emory River and surrounding community. In February 2009, TVA awarded a contract to the Company to provide project management services associated with the clean-up. All remediation and dredging were completed in August 2013 by other contractors under direct contracts with TVA. The Company did not perform the remediation, and its scope was limited to program management services. Certain employees of the contractors performing the cleanup work on the project filed lawsuits against the Company beginning in August 2013, alleging they were injured due to the Company's failure to protect the plaintiffs from exposure to fly ash, and asserting related personal injuries. There are currently 6 separate cases pending against the Company. The primary case, Greg Adkisson, et al. v. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., case No. 3:13-CV-505-TAV-HBG, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, consists of 10 consolidated cases. This case and the related cases involve several hundred plaintiffs that have been filed against the Company by employees of the contractors that completed the remediation and dredging work. The cases are at various stages of litigation, and several of the cases are currently stayed pending resolution of other cases. Separately, in May 2019, Roane County and the cities of King and Herriman filed a claim against TVA and the Company alleging that they misled the public about risks associated with the released fly ash. In October 2020, the Court granted Jacobs and TVA’s motion to dismiss with prejudice the Roane County litigation based on the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations.In addition, in November 2019, a resident of Roane County filed a putative class action against TVA and the Company alleging they failed to adequately warn local residents about risks associated with the released fly ash. In February 2020, the Company learned that the district attorney in Roane County recommended that the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation investigate issues pertaining to clean up worker safety at Kingston, with that investigation still pending. There has been no finding of liability against the Company or that any of the alleged illnesses are the result of exposure to fly ash in any of the above matters. The Company disputes the claims asserted in all of the above matters and is vigorously defending these claims. The Company does not expect the resolution of these matters to have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
On October 31, 2019, the Company received a request from the Enforcement Division of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") for the voluntary production of certain information and documents. The information and documents sought by the SEC primarily relate to the operations of a joint venture in Morocco which was at one time partially-owned by the Company (and subsequently divested), including in respect of possible corrupt practices. The Company is fully cooperating with the SEC and is producing the requested information and documents in its possession. The Company does not expect the resolution of this matter to have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

19.    Segment Information
The Company's 2 operating segments and global lines of business (“LOB”("LOBs") are as follows: Critical Mission Solutions ("CMS") and People & Places Solutions ("P&PS"), which also servewith the previous Energy, Chemicals and Resources ("ECR") LOB reported as our operating segments: Petroleum &discontinued operations. For further information on ECR, refer to Note 15- Sale of Energy, Chemicals Buildings & Infrastructure, Aerospace & Technology, and Industrial. We determined that this new organization would better support the needs of managing each unique set of customers that fall within each segment. As a result of the new organization, we subsequently realigned our internal reporting structures to enable ourResources ("ECR") Business.
The Company’s Chair and Chief Executive Officer who is also ourthe Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), to and can evaluate the performance of each of these segments and make appropriate resource allocations among each of the segments. For purposes of ourthe Company’s goodwill impairment testing, we haveit has been determined that ourthe Company’s operating segments are also ourits reporting units based on management’s conclusion that the components comprising each of ourits operating segments share similar economic characteristics and meet the aggregation criteria for reporting units in accordance with ASC 350.

350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other.

Under the currentthis organization, each LOB has a president that reports directly to the Company's Chairman and CEO or CODM. In addition, the sales function which had beenis managed centrally for many years, is now managed on anby LOB, basis, and accordingly, the associated cost is now embedded in the new segments and reported to the respective LOB presidents.head of each LOB. In addition, a portion of the costs of other support functions (e.g., finance, legal, human resources, and information technology) is allocated to each LOB using methodologies
F-60

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
which, we believe, effectively attribute the cost of these support functions to the revenue generating activities of the Company on a rational basis. The cost of the Company’s cash incentive plan, the Leadership Performance Plan ("LPP"), formerly named the Management Incentive Plan, (“MIP”) and the expense associated with the Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (“1999 SIP”) have likewise been charged to the LOBs except for those amounts determined to relate to the business as a whole (which amounts remain in corporate’s results of operations)other corporate expenses).

Financial information for each LOB is reviewed by the CODM to assess performance and make decisions regarding the allocation of resources. The Company generally does not track assets by LOB, nor does it provide such information to the CODM.

F-46


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The CODM evaluates the operating performance of our LOBs using segment operating profit, which is defined as margin less “corporate charges” (e.g., the allocated amounts described above). The Company incurs certain SG&ASelling, General and Administrative costs which(“SG&A”) that relate to its business as a whole which are not allocated to the LOBs.

The following tables present total revenues and segment operating profit for each reportable segment (in thousands) and includes a reconciliation of segment operating profit to total U.S. GAAP operating profit by including certain corporate-level expenses and expenses relating to the Restructuringrestructuring and other charges and transaction costs associated with the CH2M professional feestransaction and integration costs and the ECR sale (in thousands).

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Revenues from External Customers:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace & Technology

$

2,360,613

 

 

$

2,657,433

 

 

$

2,924,753

 

Buildings & Infrastructure

 

2,452,321

 

 

 

2,253,512

 

 

 

2,458,379

 

Industrial

 

2,743,662

 

 

 

2,793,713

 

 

 

2,517,571

 

Petroleum & Chemicals

 

2,466,192

 

 

 

3,259,499

 

 

 

4,214,129

 

Total

$

10,022,788

 

 

$

10,964,157

 

 

$

12,114,832

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Operating Profit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace & Technology

$

202,595

 

 

$

203,808

 

 

$

205,368

 

Buildings & Infrastructure (1)

 

193,455

 

 

 

174,648

 

 

 

145,299

 

Industrial

 

115,262

 

 

 

81,268

 

 

 

126,531

 

Petroleum & Chemicals

 

113,858

 

 

 

126,604

 

 

 

138,351

 

Total Segment Operating Profit

 

625,170

 

 

 

586,328

 

 

 

615,549

 

Other Corporate Items

 

(81,595

)

 

 

(60,100

)

 

 

(15,739

)

Restructuring and Other Charges

 

(134,206

)

 

 

(187,630

)

 

 

(154,283

)

CH2M Professional Fees and Integration

   Costs

 

(17,100

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total U.S. GAAP Operating Profit

 

392,269

 

 

 

338,598

 

 

 

445,527

 

Gain (Loss) on disposal of business and

   investments

 

10,880

 

 

 

(41,410

)

 

 

(2,909

)

Total Other Expense (2)

 

(9,932

)

 

 

(10,465

)

 

 

(12,481

)

Earnings Before Taxes

$

393,217

 

 

$

286,723

 

 

$

430,137

 

(1)

Excludes $ 23,844 in restructuring and other charges for the fiscal year ended September 29, 2017.

(2)

Years ending September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016 include Restructuring and other charges of $1,233 and $277, respectively.

For the Years Ended
October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Revenues from External Customers:
Critical Mission Solutions$4,965,952 $4,551,162 $3,725,365 
People & Places Solutions8,601,023 8,186,706 6,854,408 
              Total$13,566,975 $12,737,868 $10,579,773 


For the Years Ended
October 2, 2020September 27, 2019September 28, 2018
Segment Operating Profit:
Critical Mission Solutions (1)$372,070 $310,043 $255,718 
People & Places Solutions (2)740,707 714,394 527,900 
Total Segment Operating Profit1,112,777 1,024,437 783,618 
Other Corporate Expenses (3)(249,391)(264,351)(161,788)
Restructuring, Transaction and Other Charges(327,413)(355,235)(234,387)
Total U.S. GAAP Operating Profit535,973 404,851 387,443 
Total Other (Expense) Income, net (4)(94,770)(53,892)(56,462)
Earnings from Continuing Operations Before Taxes$441,203 $350,959 $330,981 

(1)Includes $15.0 million in charges during the year ended September 28, 2018 associated with a legal matter.
(2)Includes $25.0 million in charges associated with a certain project for the year ended September 27, 2019.
(3)Other corporate expenses include costs that were previously allocated to the ECR segment prior to discontinued operations presentation in connection with the ECR sale in the approximate amount of $— million, $14.8 million and $25.6 million for the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018, respectively. Also includes intangibles amortization of $90.6 million, $79.1 million and $68.1 million for the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018, respectively.
(4)For the years ended October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019, other expenses includes revenues under the Company's TSA with Worley of $15.8 million and $35.4 million, respectively, $74.3 million and $64.8 million in fair value adjustments related to our investment in Worley stock (net of Worley Stock dividends) and certain foreign currency revaluations relating to ECR sale proceeds, respectively. Also included for the years ended October 2, 2020, September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018 is amortization of deferred financing fees related to the CH2M acquisition of $0.7 million, $3.2 million and $1.8 million respectively. Lastly, includes loss on settlement of U.S. pension plan of $2.7 million for the year ended October 2, 2020 and includes gain on settlement of the CH2M retiree medical plans of $35.0 million for the year ended September 27, 2019.
F-61

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Included in “otherother corporate items”expenses in the above table are costs and expenses which relate to general corporate activities as well as corporate-managed benefit and insurance programs. Such costs and expenses include: (i) those elements of SG&A expenses relating to the business as a whole; (ii) those elements of the Management Incentive Plan and the 1999 SIPour incentive compensation plans relating to corporate personnel whose other compensation costs are not allocated to the LOBs; (iii) the amortization of intangible assets acquired as part of purchased business combinations; (iv) the quarterly variances between the Company’s actual costs of certain of its self-insured integrated risk and employee benefit programs and amounts charged to the LOBs; and (v) certain adjustments relating to costs associated with the Company’s international defined benefit pension plans. In addition, “otherother corporate items” includesexpenses may also include from time to time certain adjustments to contract margins (both positive and negative) associated with projects where it has been determined, in the opinion of management, that such adjustments are not indicative of the performance of the related LOB and therefore should not be attributed to the LOB.

Included in gain on disposal of business and investments for the year ended September 29, 2017 was a gain on the sale of the Company’s ownership interest in the Neste Jacobs joint venture.  Included in loss on disposal of business and investments for the year ended September 30, 2016 was the losses associated with the sale of the Company’s French subsidiary and a non-cash write-off on an equity investment.

F-47


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

We provide a broad range of technical, professional, and construction services including engineering, design, and architectural services; construction and construction management services; operations and maintenance services; and process, scientific, and systems consulting services. We provide our services through offices and subsidiaries located primarily in North America, South America, Europe, the Middle East, India, Australia, Africa, and Asia. We provide our services under cost-reimbursable and fixed-price contracts.

The following tables present total services revenues for each reportable segment for the three years ended September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016 and October 2, 2015 (in thousands):

 

 

 

For the Year Ended

 

 

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

 

 

Aerospace & Technology

 

 

Buildings & Infrastructure

 

 

Industrial

 

 

Petroleum & Chemicals

 

 

Total

 

Technical Professional Services Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Project Services

 

$

960,374

 

 

$

2,185,220

 

 

$

196,171

 

 

$

1,464,098

 

 

$

4,805,863

 

Process, Scientific and Systems Consulting

 

 

774,063

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31,081

 

 

 

805,144

 

Total Technical Professional Services

   Revenues

 

 

1,734,437

 

 

 

2,185,220

 

 

 

196,171

 

 

 

1,495,179

 

 

 

5,611,007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Field Services Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction

 

 

250,956

 

 

 

254,118

 

 

 

1,901,299

 

 

 

967,888

 

 

 

3,374,261

 

Operations and Maintenance ("O&M")

 

 

375,220

 

 

 

12,983

 

 

 

646,192

 

 

 

3,125

 

 

 

1,037,520

 

Total Field Services Revenues

 

 

626,176

 

 

 

267,101

 

 

 

2,547,491

 

 

 

971,013

 

 

 

4,411,781

 

Total Revenues

 

$

2,360,613

 

 

$

2,452,321

 

 

$

2,743,662

 

 

$

2,466,192

 

 

$

10,022,788

 

 

 

For the Year Ended

 

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

 

 

Aerospace & Technology

 

 

Buildings & Infrastructure

 

 

Industrial

 

 

Petroleum & Chemicals

 

 

Total

 

Technical Professional Services Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Project Services

 

$

910,290

 

 

$

2,094,282

 

 

$

891,018

 

 

$

1,843,250

 

 

$

5,738,840

 

Process, Scientific and Systems Consulting

 

 

803,654

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

48,675

 

 

 

852,329

 

Total Technical Professional Services

   Revenues

 

 

1,713,944

 

 

 

2,094,282

 

 

 

891,018

 

 

 

1,891,925

 

 

 

6,591,169

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Field Services Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction

 

 

171,614

 

 

 

119,463

 

 

 

1,601,562

 

 

 

1,366,251

 

 

 

3,258,890

 

Operations and Maintenance ("O&M")

 

 

771,875

 

 

 

39,767

 

 

 

301,133

 

 

 

1,323

 

 

 

1,114,098

 

Total Field Services Revenues

 

 

943,489

 

 

 

159,230

 

 

 

1,902,695

 

 

 

1,367,574

 

 

 

4,372,988

 

Total Revenues

 

$

2,657,433

 

 

$

2,253,512

 

 

$

2,793,713

 

 

$

3,259,499

 

 

$

10,964,157

 

F-48


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table presents certain financial information by geographic area (in thousands):

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

 

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

$

5,822,843

 

 

$

6,247,448

 

 

$

7,154,433

 

Europe

 

 

2,262,092

 

 

 

2,346,224

 

 

 

2,074,837

 

Canada

 

 

590,604

 

 

 

927,942

 

 

 

1,065,651

 

Asia

 

 

253,167

 

 

 

299,952

 

 

 

304,393

 

India

 

 

165,295

 

 

 

187,929

 

 

 

163,871

 

Australia and New Zealand

 

 

628,945

 

 

 

436,670

 

 

 

611,271

 

South America and Mexico

 

 

73,456

 

 

 

125,610

 

 

 

143,014

 

Middle East and Africa

 

 

226,386

 

 

 

392,382

 

 

 

597,362

 

Total

 

$

10,022,788

 

 

$

10,964,157

 

 

$

12,114,832

 

Property, equipment and improvements, net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

$

220,416

 

 

$

195,392

 

 

$

208,155

 

Europe

 

 

46,108

 

 

 

37,163

 

 

 

55,713

 

Canada

 

 

18,435

 

 

 

21,464

 

 

 

36,647

 

Asia

 

 

2,793

 

 

 

3,069

 

 

 

3,859

 

India

 

 

19,191

 

 

 

13,350

 

 

 

16,264

 

Australia and New Zealand

 

 

18,692

 

 

 

18,888

 

 

 

24,460

 

South America and Mexico

 

 

4,619

 

 

 

5,621

 

 

 

9,127

 

Middle East and Africa

 

 

19,657

 

 

 

24,726

 

 

 

27,013

 

Total

 

$

349,911

 

 

$

319,673

 

 

$

381,238

 

Revenues were earned from unaffiliated clients located primarily within the various and respective geographic areas shown.

The following table presents the revenues earned directly or indirectly from the U.S. federal government and its agencies, expressed as a percentage of total revenues:

For the Years Ended

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

October 2, 2015

 

 

19.2%

 

 

 

21.4%

 

 

 

21.7%

 

F-49


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

16.20.    Selected Quarterly Information — Unaudited

The following table presents selected quarterly financial information. (in thousands, except for per share amounts):

 

 

First

Quarter

 

 

Second

Quarter

 

 

Third

Quarter

 

 

Fourth

Quarter

 

 

Fiscal

Year

 

September 29, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

2,551,604

 

 

$

2,302,567

 

(f)

$

2,514,751

 

(f)

$

2,653,866

 

 

$

10,022,788

 

Operating profit (a)

 

 

88,628

 

 

 

68,173

 

(f)

 

128,475

 

(f)

 

106,993

 

 

 

392,269

 

Earnings before taxes

 

 

85,880

 

 

 

60,491

 

 

 

127,396

 

 

 

119,450

 

 

 

393,217

 

Net earnings of the Group

 

 

61,153

 

 

 

44,165

 

 

 

88,629

 

 

 

93,428

 

 

 

287,375

 

Net earnings attributable to Jacobs

 

 

60,536

 

(f)

 

50,018

 

(f)

 

89,032

 

(f)

 

94,141

 

(f)(g)

 

293,727

 

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

0.50

 

(f)

 

0.41

 

(f)

 

0.74

 

(f)

 

0.78

 

(f)(g)

 

2.43

 

Diluted

 

 

0.50

 

(f)

 

0.41

 

(f)

 

0.74

 

(f)

 

0.78

 

(f)(g)

 

2.42

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

2,847,934

 

 

$

2,781,763

 

 

$

2,693,873

 

 

$

2,640,587

 

 

$

10,964,157

 

Operating profit (a)

 

 

59,450

 

 

 

86,781

 

 

 

109,556

 

 

 

82,811

 

 

 

338,598

 

Earnings before taxes

 

 

57,787

 

 

 

90,456

 

 

 

102,807

 

 

 

35,673

 

 

 

286,723

 

Net earnings of the Group

 

 

50,306

 

 

 

63,389

 

 

 

70,937

 

 

 

29,883

 

 

 

214,515

 

Net earnings attributable to Jacobs

 

 

46,514

 

(b)

 

65,250

 

(b)

 

69,055

 

(b)

 

29,644

 

(b)

 

210,463

 

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

0.38

 

(b)

 

0.54

 

(b)

 

0.58

 

(b)

 

0.25

 

(b)

 

1.75

 

Diluted

 

 

0.38

 

(b)

 

0.54

 

(b)

 

0.57

 

(b)

 

0.24

 

(b)

 

1.73

 

October 2, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

3,187,005

 

 

$

2,903,332

 

 

$

2,907,541

 

 

$

3,116,954

 

 

$

12,114,832

 

Operating profit (a)

 

 

158,223

 

 

 

133,045

 

 

 

100,434

 

 

 

53,825

 

 

 

445,527

 

Earnings before taxes

 

 

154,695

 

 

 

128,962

 

 

 

97,188

 

 

 

49,292

 

 

 

430,137

 

Net earnings of the Group

 

 

106,195

 

 

 

88,110

 

 

 

97,308

 

 

 

37,269

 

 

 

328,882

 

Net earnings attributable to Jacobs

 

 

100,079

 

 

 

81,967

 

(c)

 

91,062

 

(c)

 

29,863

 

(c)

 

302,971

 

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

0.78

 

 

 

0.65

 

(c)

 

0.74

 

(c)

 

0.25

 

(c)

 

2.42

 

Diluted

 

 

0.77

 

 

 

0.64

 

(c)

 

0.73

 

(c)

 

0.24

 

(c)

 

2.40

 

(a)

Operating profit represents revenues less (i) direct costs of contracts, and (ii) selling, general and administrative expenses.

(b)

Includes costs of $48.1 million, or $0.39 per diluted share, in the first quarter of fiscal 2016, $25.7 million or $0.21 per diluted share in the second quarter of fiscal 2016, $25.8 million, or $0.21 per diluted share, in the third quarter, and $36.0 million or $0.3 per diluted share in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, in each case, related to the 2015 Restructuring.  Also included in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 were $17.1 million, or $0.14 per diluted share related to the loss on sale of our French subsidiary; and $10.4 million, or $0.09 per diluted share related to the non-cash write-off on an equity investment.

 First
Quarter
 Second
Quarter
 Third
Quarter
 Fourth
Quarter
 Fiscal
Year
October 2, 2020         
Revenues$3,360,049  $3,427,180 $3,260,057 $3,519,689  $13,566,975 
Operating profit (a)$151,345 (b)$167,778 (b)$194,376 (b)$22,474 (b)$535,973 
Earnings (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Taxes$254,169  $(176,805) $303,681  $60,158  $441,203 
Net Earnings (Loss) of the Group from Continuing Operations$185,680  $(115,683) $236,007  $79,879  $385,883 
Net Earnings (Loss) Attributable to Jacobs from Continuing Operations$179,423 (b)$(121,967)(b)$226,886 (b)$69,519 (b)$353,861 
Net Earnings (Loss) Attributable to Jacobs$257,010 (b)$(92,087)(b)$244,929 (b)$81,993 (b)$491,845 
Earnings per share:         
Basic Net Earnings (Loss) from Continuing Operations Per Share$1.35 $(0.92)$1.74 $0.53 $2.69 
Basic Net Earnings from Discontinued Operations Per Share$0.58 $0.23 $0.14 $0.10 $1.05 
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share$1.93 $(0.69)$1.88 $0.63 $3.74 
Diluted Net Earnings (Loss) from Continuing Operations Per Share$1.33 (b)$(0.92)(b)$1.73 (b)$0.53 (b)$2.67 
Diluted Net Earnings (Loss) from Discontinued Operations Per Share$0.58 $0.23 $0.14 $0.09 (c)$1.04 
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share$1.91 $(0.69)$1.87 $0.62 $3.71 
September 27, 2019         
Revenues$3,083,788  $3,091,596 

$3,169,622 

$3,392,862  $12,737,868 
Operating profit (a)$113,130 (c)$102,681 (c)$89,954 (c)$99,086 (c)$404,851 
Earnings from Continuing Operations Before Taxes$92,191  $111,832  $93,399  $53,537  $350,959 
Net Earnings of the Group from Continuing Operations$69,433  $119,779  $95,380  $29,413  $314,005 
Net Earnings Attributable to Jacobs from Continuing Operations$64,894 (c)$114,755 (c)$89,365 (c)$21,946 (c)$290,960 
Net Earnings Attributable to Jacobs$124,296 (c)$56,917 (c)$524,442 (c)$142,324 (c)$847,979 
Earnings per share:         
Basic Net Earnings from Continuing Operations Per Share$0.45 $0.83 $0.65 $0.16 $2.11 
Basic Net Earnings (Loss) from Discontinued Operations Per Share$0.42 $(0.42)$3.18 $0.89 $4.03 
Basic Earnings Per Share$0.87 $0.41 $3.83 $1.06 $6.14 
Diluted Net Earnings from Continuing Operations Per Share$0.45 (c)$0.82 (c)$0.65 (c)$0.16 (c)$2.09 
Diluted Net Earnings (Loss) from Discontinued Operations Per Share$0.41 $(0.41)$3.15 $0.88 (d)$4.00 
Diluted Earnings Per Share$0.86 $0.41 $3.80 $1.04 $6.08 

(c)

Includes costs of $9.6 million, or $0.08 per diluted share, in the second quarter of fiscal 2015, $30.1 million or $0.24 per diluted share in the third quarter of fiscal 2015, and $68.2 million, or $0.56 per diluted share, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, in each case, related to the 2015 Restructuring.

(a)Operating profit represents revenues less (i) direct costs of contracts and (ii) selling, general and administrative expenses.

(d)

Includes costs of $47.0 million, or $0.35 per diluted share, in the third quarter of fiscal 2014, and $30.4 million, or $0.23 per diluted share, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, in each case, related to the 2014 Restructuring.

F-62

(e)

Includes $6.4 million, or $0.05 per diluted share, increase to net earnings related to a gain on the sale of certain intellectual property in the second quarter of fiscal 2014.

F-50


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(f)

Includes costs of $31.7 million, or $0.18 per diluted share, in the first quarter of fiscal 2017; includes $16.5 million in revenue, $72.2 million in operating profit, $45.2 million in net earnings attributable to Jacobs, or $0.37 per diluted share, in the second quarter of fiscal 2017; includes $1 million in revenue, $10.7 million in operating profit and $6.3 million in net earnings attributable to Jacobs, or $0.05 per diluted share, in the third quarter of fiscal 2017; includes $19.5 million in operating profit, $13.6 million in net earnings attributable to Jacobs, or $0.11 per diluted share, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, in each case, related to restructuring and other charges.

(g)

Includes costs of $10.6 million, or $0.09 per diluted share, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 related to professional fees and integration costs for the CH2M acquisition.  

17. Definitions

The following terms used(b)Includes $85.2 million in operating profit and $(17.7) million in net earnings from continuing operations attributable to Jacobs, or $(0.13) per diluted share from continuing operations in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and these Notesfirst quarter of fiscal 2020; includes $68.7 million in operating profit, $308.2 million in net loss from continuing operations attributable to Consolidated Financial Statements have the meanings set forth below:

“1989 ESPP” means the Jacobs, Engineering Group Inc. 1989 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated. The 1989 ESPP is a shareholder-approved, broad-based, employee stock purchase plan qualified under Section 423 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.

“1999 ODSP" means the Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 1999 Outside Director Stock Plan, as amended and restated. The 1999 ODSP is a shareholder-approved, equity-based compensation plan covering Jacobs' non-management directors.

“1999 SIP” means the Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated. The 1999 SIP is a shareholder-approved, equity-based compensation plan covering the Company's officers and key employees.

The "2015 Restructuring" refers to a series of initiatives intended to improve operational efficiency, reduce costs, and better position the Company to drive growth of the businessor $2.31 per diluted share from continuing operations in the future. Actions included involuntary terminations, the abandonmentsecond quarter of certain leased offices,fiscal 2020; includes $44.6 million in operating profit and the co-location of employees. Included$(61.6) million in net earnings from continuing operations attributable to Jacobs, or $(0.47) per diluted share from continuing operations in the Company's consolidated resultsthird quarter of fiscal 2020; includes $235.4 million in operating profit and $144.8 million in both net earnings from continuing operations for fiscal 2017, fiscal 2016attributable to Jacobs, and fiscal 2015 are pre-tax costs of $98.7 million, $187.9 million and $157.2 million, respectively, relating to the 2015 Restructuring. These costs are primarily included in SG&A in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

The "2014 Restructuring" refers to a series of initiatives intended to improve operational efficiency, reduce costs, accelerate the integration of SKM, and better position the Company to drive growth of the business in the future. Actions included involuntary terminations, the abandonment of certain leased offices, and the co-location of employees. Included in the Company's consolidated results of operations for fiscal 2014 are pre-tax costs of $93.3 million relating to the 2014 Restructuring. These costs are included in SG&A in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

“ASC” refers to the Accounting Standards Codification as maintained by the FASB. The ASC is the primary source of U.S. GAAP to be applied by the Company and all other nongovernmental entities. The ASC organizes and presents hundreds of previously separate pieces of authoritative accounting guidance into a single on-line research database. The accounting principles promulgated by the ASC are organized therein by broad topics, and are updated by the FASB through the issuances of ASUs.

“ASU” means Accounting Standards Updates, the primary means by which the ASC is updated by the FASB.

“Company” (including “we”, “us” or “our”) means Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries and affiliates.

“Consolidated EBITDA" generally means consolidated net earnings attributable to Jacobs, plus consolidatedor $1.10 per diluted share in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020 related to restructuring, transaction and other charges (including the Company's fourth quarter fiscal 2020 transformation initiatives relating to real estate and other staffing programs), amortization of intangibles and fair value adjustments related to our investment in Worley stock (net of Worley stock dividend) and certain foreign currency revaluations relating to ECR sale. On a year to date basis, impacts on net earnings from continuing operations attributable to Jacobs were (i) interest expense,$248.2 million in restructuring, transaction and other charges (includes $146.6 million related to charges for the Company's fourth quarter fiscal 2020 transformation initiatives relating to real estate and other staffing programs,), (ii) tax expense,$68.3 million of intangible asset amortization and (iii) depreciation$56.9 million in fair value adjustments related to our investment in Worley stock (net of Worley stock dividend) and amortization expense (including amortization expensecertain foreign currency revaluations relating to intangible assets).

"Consolidated Funded Indebtedness" generally means the sumECR sale.

(c)Includes $47.2 million in operating profit and $46.8 million in net earnings from continuing operations attributable to Jacobs, or $0.33 per diluted share from continuing operations in the first quarter of (i)fiscal 2019; includes $119.0 million in operating profit, $50.8 million in net earnings from continuing operations attributable to Jacobs, or $0.36 per diluted share from continuing operations in the balances outstanding under all loan, credit,second quarter of fiscal 2019; includes $142.8 million in operating profit and similar agreements for borrowed money (including purchase money indebtedness), (ii) all amounts representing direct obligations arising under letters$103.8 million in net earnings from continuing operations attributable to Jacobs, or $0.75 per diluted share from continuing operations in the third quarter of credit, (iii) indebtednessfiscal 2019; includes $154.2 million in respect of capital leasesoperating profit, $179.3 million in both net earnings from continuing operations attributable to Jacobs and similar financing arrangements, and (iv) the value of all guarantees issued with respect to the types of indebtedness described in (i) through (iii).

F-51


JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

"Consolidated Leverage Ratio" means, as of any date of determination, the ratio of (i) the Company's Consolidated Funded Indebtedness as of such date to (ii) the Company's Consolidated EBITDA for the immediately preceding four consecutive fiscal quarters.

“EPS” means earnings-per-share. “Basic EPS” is computed by dividing the consolidated net earnings attributable to Jacobs, byor $1.32 per diluted share in the weighted average numberfourth quarter of sharesfiscal 2019 related to restructuring, transaction and other charges, amortization of commonintangibles and fair value adjustments related to our investment in Worley stock outstanding during the period. “Diluted EPS” is computed in a manner similar(net of Worley stock dividend) and certain foreign currency revaluations relating to the computationECR sale. On a year to date basis, impacts on net earnings from continuing operations attributable to Jacobs were (i) $259.8 million in restructuring, transaction and other charges, (ii) $59.0 million of Basic EPS, but gives effectintangible asset amortization and (iii) $48.6 million in fair value adjustments related to all dilutive securities that were outstanding duringour investment in Worley stock (net of Worley stock dividend) and certain foreign currency revaluations relating to the period. Our dilutive securities consist of nonqualified stock options and restricted stock (including restricted stock units)

“Fair Value” meansECR sale.

(d)For the price that would be receivedthree-month period ended September 27, 2019, diluted net earnings (loss) per share from selling an asset, or paiddiscontinued operations included $89.7 million related to transfer a liability,revisions to previous income tax expense estimates, $17.4 million in an orderly transaction between market participants asfinalization of the date fair value is determined (i.e.,pre-tax gain on the “measurement date”). When determining fair value, U.S. GAAP requires that we consider the principal or most advantageous market in which we would transact any sale or purchase. U.S. GAAP also requires that the inputs (factors) we use (consider) to determine fair value be considered in the following order of priority:

Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2 inputs are observable inputs (other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1) such as (i) quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, (ii) quoted prices in markets that have insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (i.e., less active markets), and (iii) model-driven valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated with, observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and

Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputsour ECR business and $9.8 million related to the valuation methodology that are significant to the fair value measurement.

difference between Nui Phao loss contingency as originally recorded and fourth quarter 2019 settlement amount.

F-63

“FASB” means the Financial Accounting Standards Board. The FASB is the designated organization within the U.S. for establishing standards of financial accounting that govern the preparation of financial reports by nongovernmental entities.

“GESPP” means the Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Global Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended. The GESPP is a shareholder-approved, broad-based, employee stock purchase plan covering employees of certain of Jacobs' non-U.S. subsidiaries.

“Group” refers to the combined economic interests and activities of Jacobs and the persons and entities holding noncontrolling interests in the subsidiaries and affiliates that are consolidated into the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.

“Jacobs” means Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

“U.S. GAAP” means those accounting principles and practices generally accepted in the United States.

“U.S. IRC” means the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

“VIE” means a “Variable Interest Entity” as defined in U.S. GAAP. A VIE is a legal entity in which equity investors do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or, as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack any one of the following three characteristics: (i) the power, through voting rights or similar rights, to direct the activities of a legal entity that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance; (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the legal entity; or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the legal entity. Accordingly, entities issuing consolidated financial statements (i.e., a “reporting entity”) shall consolidate a VIE if the reporting entity has a “controlling financial interest” in the VIE, as demonstrated by the reporting entity having both (i) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance; and (ii) the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.




Report of Ernst & Young LLP

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders

of Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of September 29, 2017October 2, 2020 and September 30, 2016, and27, 2019, the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended October 2, 2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at October 2, 2020 and September 29, 2017. 27, 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended October 2, 2020, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of October 2, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated November 24, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Adoption of New Accounting Standards

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for leases in 2020 to reflect the accounting method change due to the adoption of ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for revenue recognition on contracts with customers in 2019 to reflect the accounting method change due to the adoption of ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).

Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s financial statements based on our audits.

We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesmisstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An auditOur audits also includes assessingincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion,


Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements referredthat were communicated or required to above present fairly,be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in all material respects,any way our opinion on the consolidated financial positionstatements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.


F-64



Revenue Recognition for Fixed-Price Engineering, Procurement and Construction Contracts
Description of the Matter
As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company recognizes engineering, procurement and construction contract revenue over time, as performance obligations are satisfied, using the percentage-of-completion method (an input method) based primarily on contract costs incurred to date compared to total estimated contract costs. Revenue recognition under this method is judgmental, as it requires the Company to prepare estimates of total contract revenue and total contract costs, including costs to complete in-process contracts.

Auditing the Company’s estimates of total contract revenue and costs used to recognize revenue on fixed-price engineering, procurement and construction contracts involved significant auditor judgment, as it required the evaluation of subjective factors, such as assumptions related to estimated labor, forecasted material and subcontractor costs and variable consideration estimates related to incentive fees and unpriced change orders. These assumptions involved significant management judgment, which affects the measurement of revenue recognized by the Company.

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
We tested certain of the Company’s controls over the estimation process that affect revenue recognized on fixed-price engineering, procurement and construction contracts. For example, we tested controls over management’s monitoring and review of project cost and variable consideration estimates, including the Company’s procedures to validate the completeness and accuracy of the data used to determine the estimates.

To test the Company’s contract estimates related to revenues recognized on fixed-price engineering, procurement, and construction projects, our audit procedures included selecting a sample of projects and, among other procedures, we obtained and inspected related contract agreements, amendments, and change orders to test the existence of customer arrangements and understand the scope and pricing of the related projects; observed selected project team status meetings at the Company and interviewed project team personnel to obtain an understanding of the status of operational performance and progress on the related projects; evaluated the reasonableness of the Company’s estimated costs to complete by obtaining and analyzing supporting documentation for a sample of cost estimate components; and compared contract profitability estimates in the current year to historical estimates and actual performance for the same projects.

Legal Contingencies
Description of the Matter
As described in Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company is subject to litigation and arbitration proceedings, including a material legal contingency related to a dispute with JKC Australia LNG Pty Limited. Auditing the Company’s estimates related to legal contingencies was especially subjective due to the judgment required to evaluate information used by management to determine whether a probable loss exists and whether a loss can be reasonably estimated, and if so, the assumptions used by management to estimate the potential range of losses. Management’s assumptions had a significant effect on loss contingency accruals recorded.

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
We tested the Company’s controls over the identification and evaluation of the completeness and valuation of contingent liabilities related to legal matters. For example, we tested controls over the Company’s assessment and valuation of loss contingencies, including their evaluation of whether a loss is probable, and measurement of the contingent liability associated with probable losses.

To test the Company’s accounting and disclosure for legal contingencies, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, inspecting legal claim documentation submitted by counterparties, assessing management’s assumptions regarding cost estimates related to potential loss contingencies, inspecting minutes of meetings of the board of directors, and obtaining audit inquiry responses from external and internal legal counsel related to loss contingencies.


F-65


Impairment of Right-of-Use and Other Long-Lived Assets

Description of the Matter
As described in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company recognized long-lived asset impairment charges during 2020 related to right-of-use assets and related property, equipment and improvements associated with real estate lease space the Company has abandoned or identified for subleasing. The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment by first identifying whether indicators of impairment exist. If indicators are present for an asset group, the Company evaluates recoverability by comparing the estimated future undiscounted cash flows to the carrying amount of the asset group. If the asset group's carrying amount exceeds its estimated future undiscounted cash flows, the fair value of the asset group is then estimated by management and compared to its carrying amount. An impairment charge is recognized on a long-lived asset group when the carrying amount exceeds fair value.

Auditing management’s evaluation of long-lived asset impairment involved subjectivity due to the estimation required to assess significant assumptions utilized in estimating the fair value of asset groups based on discounted cash flow models, such as assumptions related to expected downtime prior to the commencement of future subleases, projected sublease income over the remaining lease periods, and discount rates.

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s long-lived asset impairment evaluation process, including controls over management’s review of significant assumptions used.

To test the Company’s long-lived asset impairment evaluation process, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, assessing the methodologies used, evaluating the significant assumptions discussed above and testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used by the Company in its analysis. We inspected lease agreements related to impaired right-of-use assets and compared significant assumptions used by management as part of fair value estimates to current industry and economic trends and performed sensitivity analysis over significant assumptions, among other procedures. We involved our valuation specialists to assist in our evaluation of certain significant assumptions used on the calculation of fair value estimates specific to market participant real estate data.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company's auditor since 1987.
Dallas, Texas
November 24, 2020

F-66


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and subsidiaries at September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended September 29, 2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.  

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of September 29, 2017, based

Opinion on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated November 21, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/S/ Ernst & Young, LLP

Dallas, Texas

November 21, 2017

Control Over Financial Reporting

Report of Ernst & Young LLP

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

We have audited Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of September 29, 2017,October 2, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and subsidiaries’subsidiaries (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 2, 2020, based on the COSO criteria.


We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019, the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended October 2, 2020, and the related notes and our report dated November 24, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control overOver Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


F-67


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 29, 2017, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016 and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended September 29, 2017 of Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and subsidiaries and our report dated November 21, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.


/S/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Dallas, Texas


November 21, 2017

F-54

24, 2020


F-68