UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172020

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period fromto

Commission File Number 000-24435

 

MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

Delaware

1850 Towers Crescent Plaza, Tysons Corner, VA  22182

51-0323571

(State of Incorporation)

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)          (Zip Code)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (703) 848-8600

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each classEach Class

Trading Symbol

Name of each exchangeEach Exchange on which registeredRegistered

Class A common stock, par value $0.001 per share

MSTR

The NASDAQNasdaq Global Select Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  Not applicable

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes      No  

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes      No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes      No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes      No  

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

 

 

Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes      No  

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant (based on the last reported sale price of the registrant’s class A common stock on June 30, 20172020 on the NASDAQNasdaq Global Select Market) was approximately $1,807.9$907.0 million.

The numberAs of February 2, 2021, the registrant had 7,622,997 and 1,964,025 shares of the registrant’s class A common stock and class B common stock outstanding, on January 26, 2018 was 9,411,810 and 2,035,184, respectively.

Documents incorporated by reference:  Portions of the definitive proxy statement for the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Registrant to be filed subsequently with the SEC are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the extent indicated herein.

 

 

 


 


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

Page

PART I

 

 

 

 

 

Item 1.

Business

45

 

 

 

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

2514

 

 

 

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

3934

 

 

 

Item 2.

Properties

3934

 

 

 

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

3935

 

 

 

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

4035

 

 

 

PART II

 

 

 

 

 

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

4136

 

 

 

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

4338

 

 

 

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

4439

 

 

 

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

6761

 

 

 

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

6862

 

 

 

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

6862

 

 

 

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

6862

 

 

 

Item 9B.

Other Information

6964

 

 

 

PART III

 

 

 

 

 

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

7065

 

 

 

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

7065

 

 

 

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

7065

 

 

 

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

7065

 

 

 

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

7065

 

 

 

PART IV

 

 

 

 

 

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

7166

Item 16.

Form 10-K Summary

66

 


The trademarks and registered trademarks of MicroStrategy Incorporated and its subsidiaries referred to herein include, but are not limited to, MicroStrategy, Intelligence Everywhere, MicroStrategy 10, MicroStrategy 10.9, MicroStrategy Cloud, MicroStrategy Analytics, MicroStrategy Mobile, MicroStrategy Desktop, MicroStrategy Web, MicroStrategy Server, MicroStrategy Distribution Services, MicroStrategy Data Mining Services, MicroStrategy Library, MicroStrategy Services,2021 HyperIntelligence, Hyper.Now, MicroStrategy Consulting, MicroStrategy Education, Usher, Usher Professional, Usher Analytics, Usher Network Manager, Usher Security, Dossier, IntelligentMicroStrategy Cloud, Enterprise andSemantic Graph, MicroStrategy Services, Global Delivery Center.Center, and Intelligent Enterprise.  Third-party product and company names mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.

 

 

CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

All references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”) to “MicroStrategy,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to MicroStrategy Incorporated and its consolidated subsidiaries (unless the context otherwise indicates).

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION AND RISK FACTOR SUMMARY

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). For this purpose, any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact, including without limitation, certain statements under “Item 1. Business,” “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and located elsewhere herein regarding industry prospects and our results of operations or financial position, may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The important factors discussed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” among others,Such forward-looking statements represent management’s current expectations and are inherently uncertain. Investors are warned that actual results may differ from management’s expectations.

Our business is subject to a number of risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by forward-looking statements made herein and presented elsewhere by management from time to time. Such forward-looking statements represent management’s current expectationsThese risks are discussed more fully under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and include, but are inherently uncertain. Investors are warned that actual results may differ from management’s expectations.not limited to the following:

We depend on revenue from a single software platform, and a substantial customer shift from a product license model to a cloud subscription model could negatively affect the timing of revenue recognition

Our results in any particular period may depend on large transactions that involve longer and less predictable sales cycles

We may fail to maintain successful relationships with our channel partners which could adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition

Our bitcoin strategy exposes us to various risks associated with bitcoin

Fluctuations in the price of bitcoin, which may be influenced by highly uncertain regulatory, commercial, and technical factors, may significantly influence the market price of our class A common stock

Our historical financial statements do not reflect the potential variability in earnings that we may experience in the future relating to bitcoin holdings

Our bitcoin holdings could subject us to regulatory scrutiny

The concentration of our bitcoin holdings enhances the risks inherent in our bitcoin acquisition strategy

Our bitcoin holdings are less liquid than our existing cash and cash equivalents and may not be able to serve as a source of liquidity for us to the same extent as cash and cash equivalents

If we or our third-party service providers experience a security breach or cyberattack, or if our private key is lost or destroyed, we may lose some or all of our bitcoin

Our recognition of deferred revenue and advance payments may not be representative of revenues for succeeding periods

We operate in an industry marked by rapid technological change and intense competition, and we may be unable to develop new offerings and deliver our products at a competitive price


The performance of our software may be impacted by changes in third party-software, new industry standards and errors, bugs and security vulnerabilities that could materially adversely affect the operation of and demand for our existing software, reduce our revenue, and lead to litigation claims against us

Business disruptions, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, could materially adversely affect our operating results or result in a material weakness in our internal controls

Our international operations are complex and expose us to additional risks

We or our third-party service providers may be the target of cybersecurity attacks or security breaches, which may harm our reputation and demand for our offerings and may disrupt our operations

Changes in, or any failure to comply with, laws or regulations relating to privacy or the collection, processing and storage of personal data could materially adversely affect our business

The market price of our class A common stock has been and may continue to be volatile

Because of the rights of our two classes of common stock and because we are controlled by Michael J. Saylor, Mr. Saylor could prevent a third party from acquiring us, or limit the ability of our other stockholders to influence corporate matters, which could make our class A common stock less attractive

We may sell shares of our class A common stock, convertible debt instruments or other convertible securities which could depress the price of our class A common stock.

Servicing our debt will require a significant amount of cash, and we may not have sufficient cash flow from our business to pay our indebtedness

We may not have the ability to raise the funds necessary to settle conversions of our outstanding convertible notes in cash or to repurchase the notes upon a fundamental change

The conditional conversion feature of our outstanding convertible notes, if triggered, may adversely affect our financial condition and operating results

The accounting method for convertible debt securities that may be settled in cash and/or shares, such as our outstanding convertible notes, could have a material effect on our diluted earnings per share

 

 


PARTPART I

 

Item 1.

Business

Overview

MicroStrategy® pursues two corporate strategies in the operation of its business. One strategy is to grow our enterprise analytics software business and the other strategy is to acquire and hold bitcoin.

MicroStrategy is a leading worldwide provider ofglobal leader in enterprise analytics software and mobility software.services.  Since our founding in 1989, MicroStrategy has been focused on empowering organizations to leverage the immense value of their data. Our missionvision is to provide enterprise customers with aenable Intelligence Everywhere by delivering world-class software platform and expert services so they can deploy unique intelligence applications.that empower enterprise users with actionable intelligence.

Our core offering is MicroStrategy 10™2021, our flagship platform offering, consolidateswhich delivers modern analytics and mobility in a single unifiedon an open, comprehensive enterprise platform.  The MicroStrategy 10 platform is available on WindowsIn 2019, we introduced HyperIntelligence®, Linuxa breakthrough technology that overlays actionable enterprise data on popular business applications and Amazon Web Services (“AWS”),workflows people rely on every day. Businesses can harness MicroStrategy’s innovative technology to make information and actions flow significantly faster so their workforce can make more informed decisions and take smarter actions. We also offer MicroStrategy Consulting and MicroStrategy Education to help customers deploy, optimize, and manage their analytics initiatives.

We also pursue a business strategy of acquiring bitcoin when our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments exceed current working capital requirements, and we may from time to time, subject to market conditions, issue debt or equity securities in capital raising transactions with the objective of using the proceeds to purchase bitcoin.  We view our bitcoin holdings as long-term holdings and we do not plan to engage in regular trading of bitcoin or to hedge or otherwise enter into derivative contracts with respect to our bitcoin holdings, though we may sell bitcoin in future periods as needed to generate cash for treasury management and other general corporate purposes.

We believe that bitcoin is attractive because it can serve as a hosted servicestore of value, supported by a robust and public open source architecture, that is untethered to sovereign monetary policy and can therefore serve as a hedge against inflation.  We also believe that bitcoin offers additional opportunity for appreciation in value with increasing adoption due to its limited supply.  In addition, we believe that our bitcoin strategy is complementary to our analytics software and services business, as we believe that our bitcoin and related activities in support of the bitcoin network enhance awareness of our brand and can provide opportunities to secure new customers for our analytics offerings.  We are also exploring opportunities to apply bitcoin related technologies such as blockchain analytics into our software offerings.

The MicroStrategy Software Platform

Our core product offering throughis our software platform. In December 2020, we released MicroStrategy Cloud™. Our platform offers a comprehensive suite2021, the newest release of business intelligence functionality, from data discovery to mobileour flagship enterprise analytics data mining, Big Data analytics, enterprise reporting and powerful identity intelligence generated by digital credentials.platform. MicroStrategy 10 builds on proven enterprise capabilities to make sophisticated, high-performance analytics more accessible, easier to use, and faster. MicroStrategy 10 consists of MicroStrategy Analytics™, MicroStrategy Mobile™, and Usher®.

MicroStrategy Analytics empowers large organizations to analyze vast amounts of data and securely distribute actionable business insight throughout an enterprise, while also being able to cater to smaller workgroups and departmental use via MicroStrategy Desktop™.  MicroStrategy Analytics delivers reports and dashboards, and enables users to conduct ad hoc analysis and share insights anywhere, anytime, via mobile devices (via MicroStrategy Mobile) or the web (via MicroStrategy Web™).  It also combines the agility and productivity of self-service visual data discovery with the security, scalability, and governance features of enterprise-grade business intelligence.  Additionally, MicroStrategy Analytics delivers powerful identity intelligence on user behavior and resource utilization (via Usher).

MicroStrategy Web is the primary interface for analysts, data scientists, consumers and developers, offering interactive reporting, dashboarding, and ad-hoc data discovery capabilities through a web browser. With MicroStrategy Web, users can design and deliver reports and dashboards across various styles of business intelligence, including scorecards, pixel-perfect documents and invoices, and interactive reports and dashboards, as well as for visual data discovery. MicroStrategy Web can also connect to a wide range of data sources, and be used2021 allows our customers to build sophisticated advanced analytical models that may be inserted within reportshigh-performance, governed, and dashboards.  MicroStrategy reports and dashboards can be personalized and automatically delivered to thousands of users with MicroStrategy Server™’s advanced distribution capabilities. Web applications can also be extensively customized and embedded into other applications using MicroStrategy Web SDK for a branded experience.

MicroStrategy Desktop is a free, standalone, on-premise, single-user tool for fast, powerful, and easy-to-use self-service visual data discovery.  It enables business users to analyze and gain valuable insight and understanding into their organizations’ data by quickly creating stunning and useful visualizations, without assistance from the IT department.  MicroStrategy Desktop can be readily downloaded and installed on a PC or Mac, making the power of MicroStrategy 10 easily available. MicroStrategy Desktop can be used while offline and while not connected to MicroStrategy Server.  MicroStrategy Desktop connects to MicroStrategy Server when needed, allowing for governance workflows that deliver data discovery capabilities to the enterprise at scale.

MicroStrategy Mobile is fully integrated into the MicroStrategy Analytics platform, so it is easy to leverage existing reports and dashboards to instantly deploy mobile business intelligence.  In addition, MicroStrategy Mobile extends beyond analytics to enable organizations to rapidly build custom enterprise mobilitysecure applications that deliver analytics combined with transactions, multimedia, and mapping to support business workflows.  The robust code-free application developmentcan scale across their enterprises. Our platform is designed to reduce development costs and accelerateempower the deployment of native mobile business apps optimized for both iOS® and Android™.  Companies can build fully native iOS and Android apps that take advantage of the unique device and operating system capabilities (e.g., GPS/location, calendar, and camera) on those devices.  MicroStrategy Mobile is an easy, fast, and cost-effective vehicle for mobilizing an organization’s information systems, including its data warehouses, business intelligence, ERP, CRM, and web applications that are currently accessible only on the desktop.  With MicroStrategy Mobile, businesses can transform their entire workforce into a connected and more productive mobile workforce.  With mobile access to


critical corporate data and systems that drivewith intelligence through the business, employees can have a virtual office in their hands at all times.  MicroStrategy Mobile also enables companies to deploy customized, white-labeled mobile apps to business partners and customers. These apps can serve as new or enhanced offerings that differentiate an organization’s product or service to business partners or customers.following differentiated features:

Usher delivers to its users unique mobile identity badges, each cryptographically linked to its owner’s smartphone and dynamically linked to the enterprise’s existing identity repositories, that are highly secure and convenient for organizations to deploy.  Usher badges work on standard smartphones running on iOS or the Android platform and include an Apple Watch® integration.  Through the use of Bluetooth®, QR codes, biometrics, push notifications, time-limited PIN codes, and other authentication methods, Usher badge users can log into applications, VPNs, and workstations, unlock doors and other physical gateways, and validate each other’s identities.  Usher badge users are also able to scan barcodes for asset tracking applications.  Usher can additionally serve as a powerful enterprise productivity tool with Usher Professional™, a dynamic and searchable employee directory that facilitates communication among users, and gives managers insight into the location and activity of their distributed workforce. Usher Professional users can view badge user activity on a nearly real-time map and manage or direct their workforce by engaging in two-way communication with badge users.  In the Enterprise Internet of Things (“EIoT”) paradigm, interactions between Usher users and enterprise resources generate real-time telemetry, which can be efficiently harnessed in Usher Analytics™, creating actionable intelligence.  By delivering strong yet convenient authentication that can be extended to nearly every corporate system, Usher can uncover insights, reduce infrastructure complexity, and secure assets -- all to help businesses flourish in the age of connected devices and connected people.  Usher addresses some of the biggest challenges facing corporations today, including authentication, identity and access management, and resource authorization, while applying industry-leading business intelligence and analytics to an enterprise’s infrastructure.

MicroStrategy on AWS allows organizations to harness the power of data through our enterprise solutions via the cloud.  Compared to traditional on-premise approaches, MicroStrategy on AWS is architected to deliver best-of-breed MicroStrategy software via the cloud, with pre-configured, ready-to-go servers, coupled with the required supporting infrastructure.  With MicroStrategy on AWS, customers can launch enterprise analytics environments within minutes via a web-based provisioning tool, and use the full MicroStrategy 10 offering.  MicroStrategy on AWS deploys MicroStrategy directly into the customer’s AWS account where the customer maintains and manages the environment.

For customers looking for a Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) experience, MicroStrategy Cloud offers managed services that deliver the full breadth of platform capabilities along with a dedicated cloud operations team to deploy the platform in the cloud.  MicroStrategy Cloud is well suited for organizations without extensive IT resources to maintain and manage the cloud infrastructure on their own.  MicroStrategy Cloud offers a 99.9% Service Level Agreement for availability, and is backed by a team of experts and dedicated tech support staff that provides continuous monitoring and alerting.  MicroStrategy Cloud maintains and keeps up to date on compliance and security certifications to help ensure the environments adhere to the Service Organization Control 2, ISO 27001, Payment Card Industry, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”), and Privacy Shield standards.

System integrators, value-added resellers, and original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) around the world rely on the capabilities of the MicroStrategy platform, including its functionality, workflows, report presentation, user management, security, administration, system configuration, and monitoring, to build branded and custom applications of their own. Our platform’s open architecture and APIs make it especially suitable for developing custom functionality or integrating with other applications.  Organizations seeking to add analytics features to their own offerings can easily and directly embed the platform into their business applications or portals with white labeling and single sign-on options.

We were incorporated as a Delaware corporation on November 17, 1989. Today, with operations in 28 countries worldwide, we are one of the largest independent publicly-traded analytics vendors as measured by annual revenue.


MicroStrategy 10

MicroStrategy 10 transforms data into business insights through highly visual, interactive reports and dashboards that can be securely distributed to hundreds of thousands of users throughout an enterprise. In MicroStrategy 10.9™, MicroStrategy introduced the Dossier™ feature, which enables users to consolidate reports and dashboards into an easy-to-consume and intuitive analytics book referred to as a dossier. With dossiers, users can utilize built-in collaboration capabilities, tables of contents, powerfulfiltering options, and proactive alerts and push notifications on top of existing reports and dashboards. 

Five key business needs have driven demand for powerful analytics solutions:

Increased consumption of analytics. In the past, dissemination of information was limited to a few power-users or analysts.  Now, a wide range of information users – from customer service representatives to the CEO within a company, and from customers to suppliers outside the organization – can benefit from the insight that analytics provides.  The wide acceptance of the Internet as an information source also has fueled demand for enterprise data to be accessible over the web to tens of thousands of users across an enterprise.  In addition, demand for analytics on mobile devices is being driven by the growth of the mobile Internet and by the accelerating proliferation of mobile devices.

Increased data scalability. Increasing information generation, and in particular, the ability to capture and store electronically every business transaction and interaction, have made terabyte-size data warehouses commonplace. Due to very large data volumes at some organizations, such as data volumes generated by social media, data warehouses can now reach sizes in excess of tens of petabytes (1,000 terabytes).  While transaction- and interaction-level information is now routinely captured, organizations often struggle to make productive use of such massive data stores.  Organizations need to view data within its operational context – making even the most detailed information meaningful to business users.  As a result, users want the ability to easily discover trends hidden in these very large databases and to verify these trends by reviewing the underlying detail.

Improved analytics system performance.The increase in user population sizes and data volumes puts a strain on analytics infrastructures.  Business users expect to retrieve the information they are requesting within seconds of making the request.  Mobile devices have set this expectation even higher by increasing demand for near instantaneous responses to requests.  Analytics administrators need to systematically monitor and tune the analytics environment to provide the expected service levels.

Improved data comprehension and visualization.  As data volumes have increased, the growing work demands placed on business users have meant progressively less time available to users to monitor and improve their businesses and make informed decisions.  As a result, business users need to view the data in a summarized, easy-to-grasp format and navigate to areas of concern for additional insight.  Presenting the data in a highly visual, accessible, and interactive format to collate, view, and explore information with agility and ease of use improves the overall comprehension of the business and speeds up the decision-making process.

Increased demand for personalized, one-to-one customer and/or supplier experience. Many companies have implemented strategies that establish personalized relationships with each customer and/or supplier based on individual needs and preferences. They earn loyalty by providing superior service, security, and convenience. In order to successfully acquire, retain, and upgrade customers, these organizations need to understand their customers’ profiles, transaction histories, past responses to marketing campaigns, and interactions with customer service. This information is often stored in widely dispersed and complex data sources, and obtaining a holistic view of the customer can be challenging.

The volume of data available to enterprises is growing at a very high rate, being driven by greater transaction detail, more sensors, more external data, and more data from mobile and social media platforms. MicroStrategy 10 helps organizations worldwide take advantage of this explosive growth in enterprise data by equipping managers and employees with timely, actionable information to make data-driven business decisions.


Solutions built on MicroStrategy 10 can give analysts, managers, and executives the critical insight they need to reduce costs, better allocate resources, improve efficiencies, and optimize operations.  MicroStrategy 10 can also be used to build stronger relationships with business partners and suppliers by providing insights for managing inventory levels, analyzing supply chains, and tracking vendor performance. MicroStrategy 10 also includes predictive capabilities that enable organizations to leverage their historical data to project future business outcomes.

MicroStrategy 10 provides IT professionals with a powerful, highly automated mechanism for delivering insightful reports and dashboards to employees throughout an organization.  In addition, MicroStrategy 10 offers self-service capabilities, which enable business users to upload, prepare, and explore enterprise data on their own, without any coding or IT expertise.  With these self-service capabilities, business users can spot trends and outliers in a completely visual and interactive way, thereby eliminating much of the need for IT to create reports and dashboards for them.

MicroStrategy 10 is available in two distinct end user products: MicroStrategy Analytics and MicroStrategy Desktop. MicroStrategy Analytics is designed for enterprise-scale business intelligence, supporting high performance analytics on gigabytes, terabytes, or petabytes of data.  Organizations can deploy MicroStrategy Analytics on-premise or access the same functionality within the MicroStrategy on AWS or MicroStrategy Cloud offerings. MicroStrategy Desktop puts the power of MicroStrategy 10 into the hands of individual users for self-service visual analytics and data discovery.  The two products share a common user experience — making it easy to start small with self-service analytics and grow into the production-grade features of MicroStrategy Analytics.

MicroStrategy Analytics

MicroStrategy Analytics is our flagship analytics software. It is a comprehensive, enterprise-grade solution featuring sophisticated analytics, scalable performance, multi-level security, and rigorous data governance.  It also combines the agility and productivity of self-service data visualization (also known as visual data discovery), which bridges the gap between fast, elegant, interactive visual analytics and powerful, large-scale enterprise business intelligence.

Key benefits of MicroStrategy Analytics include:

Flexibility to report, analyze, and monitor. MicroStrategy Analytics unifies reporting, analysis, and real-time business monitoring into one seamless experience for the business user, one efficient and scalable architecture for the IT professional, and one economical and extensible utility for the CIO.

Single platform for enterprise data discovery and analytics. MicroStrategy Analytics supports both business user and traditional IT user needs by offering various styles of BI bundled into a single comprehensive analytics platform. Business users have access to the data discovery toolset via MicroStrategy Web, MicroStrategy Desktop and MicroStrategy Mobile, and these user interfaces also allow them to consume other styles of analytics that their IT organizations have deployed, including pixel-perfect dashboards, enterprise reports and statements, scorecards, and more. Organizations do not need to resort to other point data discovery tools to gain access to agile data discovery capabilities, as they are available as an integrated part of MicroStrategy Analytics.

 

Industrial-strength analytics. MicroStrategyModern Analytics enables industrial-strength:  We offer a modern analytics with enterprise-caliber technologyexperience by delivering insights across multiple devices to users via our HyperIntelligence products, visualization and high user-reporting capabilities, mobility features, and data-scalability.  It enables centralized administration, operations, and maintenance in a unified interface and from within a unified hardware environment.  Users can connect through their mobile devices, a zero-footprint web offering, a desktop-based client for offline analysis and by directly injecting analytics into Microsoft® Office products — expanding the reach of business intelligence across the enterprise.custom applications developed on our platform.

 

HyperIntelligence – Our platform improves business processes by providing cards with contextual intelligence, suggestions, and workflows directly within the websites, applications, and mobile devices that people rely on every day. For example, users can simply hover over a highlighted word on a website to instantly bring up relevant, contextual insights on key data.  

Data discovery at scale. MicroStrategy Analytics offers data discovery capabilitiesVisualization and is availableReporting – Our platform uses Dossier®, our self-service dashboarding tool, that provides users with the formatting, layout, and input controls they need to build beautiful analytics applications.  

Transformational Mobility – Our platform empowers the end user across all standard user interfaces. With its HTML5 interface, users are ableincreasingly mobile workforce to connectmake decisions and take action quickly on-the-go.  It delivers more ways for organizations to most data sources, ranging from personal spreadsheets to enterprise warehouses and cloud hosted sources, and can blend and prepare the data on their own without any IT support. This fully self-service work flow also allows the extension of the software to integrate with other third-party capabilities.  For instance, although MicroStrategy Analytics includes a variety of out-of-the-box visualizations, it also provides the ability to include other third-party visualizations like D3 and high charts, as well as thequickly


 

ability to include nativedeploy mobile productivity apps for a variety of business functions and third-party advanced analytics into native workflows. The dashboards that include all of these components can also be personalized and shared with thousands of users across the organization using our powerful MicroStrategy Distribution Services™.

Data to insight in minutes without IT involvement. MicroStrategy Analytics gives business users a simple, powerful, and fast way to analyze data with minimal set-up requirements.  It is designed to allow business users to answer business questions on their own, avoiding the lengthy process of report specification and design. By using a variety of graphical visualizations to represent the entire analysis, users can easily and rapidly spot trends and outliers in large data sets, creating a user experience that seems to unfold in real time.  In addition to this, MicroStrategy Analytics also supports traditional centralized BI through its metadata based architecture, from which MicroStrategy Analytics gains its ability to design highly reusable objects that deliver both high performance and scale. The combination of enterprise scalability along with data discovery features brings the power of enterprise analytics to the personal level, making it easy to extend the power of the entire MicroStrategy Analytics platform to everyone in the organization.

Actionable insight. MicroStrategy Analytics helps organizations accelerate the speed and productivity of their businesses by building mobile apps and web reports and dashboards that connect to back-end transactional systems and databases to include data entry and action-taking features, including: submitting orders, one-click approvals and denials, notes for tracking and directing business activity, and write-back to data sources.

Governed data discovery. MicroStrategy Analytics enables organizations to achieve data consistency and governance across every report, dashboard, and user within the system through a trusted and centralized metadata store. By leveraging our reusable metadata to define, manage, and maintain common definitions for metrics, attributes, data sets, and other objects through governed data discovery, organizations can lower the overall cost of developing new analytical outputs (such as reports or dashboards), while helping to ensure that the information delivered in those outputs is accurate, governed, and timely. MicroStrategy Analytics not only provides governance via centralized IT deployments where the reports and dashboards are based around a centralized metadata store, but also offers the ability to promote desktop-based reports and dashboards created by business users to MicroStrategy Server, and to map external data assets to certified data systems.

Heterogeneous access, joining and preparation of data from across the enterprise.  MicroStrategy Analytics enables organizations to create integrated views of data across heterogeneous data stores. By mapping conforming dimensions from multiple sources within the MicroStrategy object model, the platform automatically joins data from multiple sources in the same table, chart, or visualization. Additionally, MicroStrategy Analytics also offers self-service data connect options to business users, who do not need to relyroles on data modeling or architecting to access any data source. Data can come from any source including most relational and columnar data warehouses, data marts, Apache™ Hadoop®, SAP® Business Information Warehouse (SAP BW), Microsoft SQL Server® Analysis Services, IBM® Cognos® TM1®, Oracle® Essbase, Salesforce®, social media sources such as Twitter and Facebook, and many other operational system databases. In addition to allowing users to connect to these data sources, MicroStrategy Analytics offers data preparation and wrangling capabilities that allow business users to transform their data for improved analysis.standard device.

 

Integration of advanced analytics into mainstream reportingCustom Applications – Our platform enables users to create highly customized web and dashboarding. MicroStrategy Analytics’ analytic engine includes predictive capabilities in MicroStrategy reports and dashboards. The analytic engine can train and calculate many of the primary data mining functions, including time-series, association rules, clustering, regression, and decision-tree algorithms. Hand-in-hand with this calculation capability, MicroStrategy Analytics also includes the ability to import data mining models directly from data mining products from vendors like IBM SPSS®, Teradata®, and SAS®mobile applications using the predictive modeling mark-up language (PMML) standard, and by embedding R statistical packages in the platform. With this capability, data mining models, such as neural network algorithms, rule set algorithms, and support vector machines, as well as ensembles of models, can be imported through a single click and automatically converted into a standard MicroStrategy metric. After that, the MicroStrategy Data Mining Services™ extension enables these metrics to be used freely and calculated quickly in reports, dashboards, and alerts. A key capability of MicroStrategy Analytics is that businessDocument tool.  


 

users can now readily tap into over 350 advanced analytics and statistical functions for data discovery purposes, and these functions are included within an easily accessible library.

Support for large data volumes and all major relational database/hardware combinations.  MicroStrategy Analytics supports systems with very large data volumes and is specifically optimized to support all major relational database platforms, Hadoop distributions, and data appliances commonly used for business intelligence systems, as well as multi-dimensional databases, such as SAP BW.  Important features of our solution in this area include:

 

o

Native connectorsOpen, Federated Architecture:  Our strategy is to HDFS, in addition toembrace innovation and deliver the hive options to connect to Cloudera®, Hortonworks®, and MapR®, among other Big Data sources;most open analytics platform on the market.

 

o

AvailableFederated Analytics – Our platform provides analysts and data scientists with seamless access to trusted, governed data directly within their favorite tools.  MicroStrategy 10,2021 includes integrations with Microsoft Excel, Power BI, and included as an integrated part ofTableau to provide users with the flexibility to leverage trusted data from MicroStrategy Server productdirectly within the client applications they are highly scalable, in-memory cubes that can now be partitionedaccustomed to.  MicroStrategy 2021 also provides integrations for Jupyter and support parallel processing. This new advancementR Studio to enable data scientists to connect to published MicroStrategy data, leverage it in in-memory architecture allows organizations to store a greater volume oftheir tools, and publish updated data in memory and offers faster processing;back into MicroStrategy 2021 – all without leaving Jupyter or R Studio.

 

o

Dynamically generated SQL, multidimensional expressions (MDX),APIs and Hadoop queriesGateways – Our gateways, APIs, and connectors enable MicroStrategy 2021 to integrate with the most popular enterprise platforms and tools.  In addition to over 200 connectors to popular drivers and gateways to enterprise assets, we offer a comprehensive set of Representational State Transfer (“REST”) APIs that optimizemakes it easy to embed the performance of each major database;platform in packaged and custom applications, workflows, and devices.

 

o

Very Large Database (VLDB) parametersMultiple Deployment Options – We also believe that allow individual reportscustomers should have the choice of where to deploy their analytics platform without compromising functionality.  Our fully featured platform can be deployed in three ways: on premises, the customer’s cloud environment, or dashboardsthe MicroStrategy Cloud Environment (“MCE”).  MCE is a cloud subscription service that allows customers to be tuned for performance;deploy the platform on Amazon Web Services (“AWS”) or Microsoft Azure environments hosted and managed by us.

 

o

Support for hand-written SQL, Hadoop, and XQuery queries;Enterprise Platform:  Our platform is designed to securely scale analytics across the enterprise. MicroStrategy 2021 has the tools that enable organizations to deliver secure, high-performance applications at scale.

 

o

AbilityEnterprise Semantic Graph – The engine of our platform is our proprietary Enterprise Semantic Graph, which provides a structured view of a company’s data assets by organizing them into understandable business terms.  Our Enterprise Semantic Graph also enriches metadata content with real-time location intelligence and content and system usage telemetry.  The Enterprise Semantic Graph allows users to support very large user populations;have a consistent and secure view across multiple data sources to deliver a single version of truth.

 

o

Highly reliable up-time, evenScalability – Our platform powers some of the largest business intelligence deployments in high volume applications.the world.  Our platform is designed to scale efficiently to hundreds of thousands of users, with millions of personalized queries, across hundreds of applications, built on top of the largest datasets.

Powerful distribution engine for information delivery. Our technology offers a high performance, personalized distribution engine for delivering periodic and alert-based information to users via email, web, and mobile devices. The distribution engine is able to deliver report and dashboard applications in a highly automated and personalized manner to all major device types used in both domestic and international markets, enabling the delivery of information to users when and where it is needed.

Customizable applications and Embedded BI. MicroStrategy Analytics applications can be customized extensively using proprietary SDK capabilities. This allows organizations to brand web and mobile-based applications, and embed these applications directly into other corporate applications. White labeling for portal integration, single sign-on, and direct integration into other software increase the deployment options of MicroStrategy Analytics and allow IT groups to roll out analytics to the entire organization in a customizable manner, while still being able to leverage investments made in other technologies.

MicroStrategy’s Metadata Architecture

The core differentiator of our platform stems from its metadata-based centralized architecture, which has been built and refined over many years and provides access to enterprise data using familiar business terms, rules, and logic. The portable, flexible, reusable, object-oriented and dynamic nature of the metadata provides an efficient BI application and mobile app development platform while maximizing maintainability and enforcing enterprise-wide consistency. The dynamic behavior of metadata in our platform helps ensure consistency across business definitions, and minimizes the number of objects created, stored, and managed.  Other BI technologies are limited in their reuse capabilities, forcing developers to create the same components over and over again for use in each individual report or dashboard.

MicroStrategy Server

MicroStrategy Server is the architectural foundation of MicroStrategy 10. It provides the core analytical processing and job management for all reporting, analysis, and monitoring applications. It provides a powerful, comprehensive set of features necessary for a scalable, fault-tolerant, enterprise-wide business intelligence system.


As the central contact point to metadata, MicroStrategy Server dynamically assembles the metadata objects to create optimized, multi-pass SQL queries for every major relational database, HiveQL queries for Hadoop distributions like Cloudera, MapR, Hortonworks, and Amazon EMR, interactive queries for real-time distributed SQL processing, optimized connectivity for NoSQL sources like Apache Cassandra™, HBase™, and MongoDB®, native connectivity to HDFS via MicroStrategy Hadoop Gateway, and MDX queries for multidimensional data sources. MicroStrategy Server retrieves the data, performs any additional analytical calculations not available in the databases, formats the report, and delivers the reports to business users via the MicroStrategy Web, Mobile, Office, or Desktop interfaces.

MicroStrategy Server is a highly scalable, parallel-processing, self-tuning analytic server. It manages high performance interactions involving terabytes of data accessed by tens of thousands of users using in-memory intelligent cubes, caching, load balancing, resource prioritization, and connection pooling. It accesses and joins data from multiple data sources, such as data warehouses, operational databases, multidimensional (cube) databases, and even web services and flat files. MicroStrategy Server also manages users, system security, data security, and user functionality access. A clustering option is available with MicroStrategy Server that increases scalability, and provides fault tolerance with automatic failover.

MicroStrategy Web

MicroStrategy Web is great for business users or consumers looking to interact with data, or to even simply view a static overview report. At the same time, MicroStrategy Web is where savvy analysts put all of the pieces together to design highly formatted and customized reports and dashboards.

MicroStrategy Web is the primary reporting interface for analysts, offering interactive reporting, dashboarding, and analysis through a web browser. It provides enterprise analytical functionality with access to extensive report and dashboard creation, manipulation, and formatting capabilities in an easy-to-use web interface.

MicroStrategy Web architecture provides a single, consistent interface to users whether the BI application is departmental and internal, or an extranet application deployed to hundreds of thousands of users.  MicroStrategy Web allows business users of any skill level to move fluidly between various styles of BI to satisfy their reporting, analysis, and monitoring needs.

MicroStrategy Desktop

MicroStrategy Desktop is a free, standalone, on-premise, single-user tool for fast, powerful, and easy-to-use self-service visual data discovery.  It enables business users to analyze and gain valuable insight and understanding into their organizations’ data by quickly creating stunning and useful visualizations, without assistance from the IT department.  MicroStrategy Desktop can be readily downloaded and installed on a PC or Mac, making the power of MicroStrategy 10 easily available. MicroStrategy Desktop can be used while offline and while not connected to MicroStrategy Server, and can connect to MicroStrategy Server when needed. This user interface can help introduce MicroStrategy 10 to smaller departments that are looking for quick and easy deployment options. It offers easy migration options to the Enterprise edition of MicroStrategy Analytics, and all analytical content developed with MicroStrategy Desktop may be promoted to MicroStrategy Server and can be consumed by the other user interfaces offered with MicroStrategy, such as MicroStrategy Web and MicroStrategy Mobile.

MicroStrategy Analytics Releases in 2017

MicroStrategy Analytics includes the following significant functional enhancements made during 2017:

Dossier.A new way of consuming analytics in the form of interactive books with built-in collaboration capabilities, tables of contents, powerful filtering options, and proactive alerts and push notifications. Dossiers are organized in chapters and pages, making it easy to navigate and find insight from analytics across the enterprise.


 

MicroStrategy Library™.A personalized portalSecurity – Our platform includes a comprehensive set of features for userssuperior administration, security, and architecture, including role-based access to access their reports, dashboards,both row and dossiers.  Each dossier is represented by a customized thumbnail image within MicroStrategy Library, making it easycolumn data.  We offer integrated digital identity solutions designed to visually identify content.

Expanded filters within dossiers.Use any visualization, chart, or graph within the filter panel of a dossier for more intuitive and modern filtering options. In addition, dossiers can include filters and target other visualizations within the main interface.

Embedding API for dossiers.A new API that leverages JavaScript to easily embed interactive dossiers into third-party applications.

Data Connector SDK.Developers and analysts can build almost any data connector with the Data Connector SDK by leveraging HTML and JavaScript, thus getting access to data sources without waiting for them to be certified by the platform.

Gallery for custom data connectors.Customers and business partners can access a public gallery of custom data connectors on MicroStrategy Community, where they can download the connectors for their own use or enhance them further prior to integration. The available connectors include Fitbit, SurveyMonkey, Jethro, Solr, Elasticsearch, and more.

Revamped MicroStrategy Desktop.Redesigned and overhauled with a new, modern interface for data access, data preparation, visualization, sharing, and authoring and designing reports and dashboards with responsive design options.

MicroStrategy Workstation.A unified product that makes it faster to build and maintain scalable enterprise content, manage users and groups, assign security roles, create data models, and much more.

Intelligent narrativesdeliver seamless, user-friendly authentication and real-time telemetry applications for analytics with NLG integration.Through technology partnerships with NLG platform providers, Automated Insights and Narrative Science, MicroStrategy Analytics supports the use of artificial intelligence to interpret charts and graphs into clear, meaningful, and intelligent narratives that explain the context of the data.

Enhanced native Hadoop Gateway.A new and re-architected Hadoop Gateway that leverages Spark to increase scalability and performance, and can access data file types such as CSV, Text, JSON, AVRO, and Parquet directly from HDFS.

R Analytics bundled and installed with platform.Customers can leverage R capabilities without having to go through a separate installation process.

Hierarchy reporting.Analysts can view and interact with ragged hierarchies with data sourced from MDX sources like MSAS and Essbase, with the ability to apply dynamic filters, create custom MDX queries, apply advanced sorting, and optimize performance.

Support for more data sources. MicroStrategy Analytics allows business users to readily connect to Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB. MicroStrategy Analytics also offers certifications for new data sources such as Maria DB 10.x, Apache Hive 2.x, SparkSQL 2.0, MapR 5.2, Druid, Amazon Athena, Oracle 12c R2, Azure SQL Database, and SAP Hana 2.x.

Improved PDF export. Analysts have more options to customize PDF versions of reports and dashboards prior to exporting them, such as selecting the page orientation, paper size, and header/footer details. Analysts can also export large grid reports, charts, and graphs that have data expanding over a page into highly formatted PDFs, ensuring no information is cut off.

MicroStrategy Analytics Technology Strategy

Our technology strategy is focused on delivering comprehensive platform-based solutions to enable any organization to create immediate value from analytics and then quickly grow its analytics effort to encompass more advanced capabilities as well as larger user and data scale. This strategy includes: expanding support for large information stores, improving performance and administration, enhancing our analysis capabilities, and enhancing report and dashboard delivery via the web and mobile devices. We continue to enhance our products for use with a broad range of operating systems and databases to enable our customers to leverage their existing technology investments to


achieve faster query times with fewer required resources. We continue to enhance usability and visual data exploration to increase ease of use and functionality, and thus further decrease the need for IT intervention. We are working to further differentiate our products by increasing:

Visual analysis and user self-service. Ease of use and visual exploration and analysis capabilities on small to extremely large data sets, in conjunction with the enterprise capabilities also offered by our platforms;

Data capacity. The volume of information that can be efficiently analyzed and utilized;

User concurrency. The number of users that can be supported simultaneously;

Analytic sophistication. The range of analytical methods available to the application designer;

Performance.  The throughput and response time of the system, measured in seconds;

Database flexibility. The range of data sources, data warehouses, and online transaction processing databases that the software is capable of efficiently querying without modification;

Robustness.  The reliability and availability of the software in mission-critical environments;

Deployability. The ease with which applications can be securely deployed, modified, upgraded, and tuned;

Personalization. The quality and sophistication of a one-to-one user experience;

Content flexibility. The range of content, both structured and unstructured, that can be efficiently utilized;

Media channel and interface flexibility. The range of media channels (including mobile devices), interface options, and display features supported; and

Transaction capabilities. The ability to efficiently initiate actions and transactions from mobile devices and web-based reports and dashboards.

MicroStrategy Mobile

Our consistently highly-rated mobile offering extends beyond basic mobile analytics to deliver an innovative mobile app platform that makes building a variety of mobile business apps easier and faster.

MicroStrategy Mobile is fully integrated into the MicroStrategy Analytics platform, so it is easy to leverage existing reports and dashboards to instantly deploy mobile business intelligence. In addition, MicroStrategy Mobile extends beyond analytics to enable organizations to rapidly build custom mobile applications that deliver analytics combined with transactions, multimedia, and mapping to support business workflows. The robust code-free application development platform is designed to reduce development costs and accelerate the deployment of native mobile business apps—optimized for both iOS and Android. Companies can build fully native iOS and Android apps that take advantage of the unique device and operating system capabilities (e.g., GPS/location, calendar, and camera) on those devices. MicroStrategy Mobile is an easy, fast, and cost-effective vehicle for mobilizing an organization’s information systems, including its data warehouses, business intelligence, ERP, CRM, and web applications that are currently accessible only on the desktop.  With MicroStrategy Mobile, businesses can transform their entire workforce into a connected and more productive mobile workforce using information-driven mobile apps that are significantly more robust and secure than their web-only counterparts.  With mobile access to critical corporate data and systems that drive the business, employees can have a virtual office in their hands at all times.  

MicroStrategy Mobile is available both as on-premise software and as a hosted service offering in MicroStrategy Cloud.


Key benefits of MicroStrategy Mobile include:

Increased employee productivity by gaining new efficiencies and cutting decision times. MicroStrategy Mobile computing can dramatically improve personal productivity, changing how people work today. MicroStrategy Mobile puts materials, information, and system access on devices that can be always on, always connected, and always in reach. MicroStrategy Mobile enables write-back to systems of record (e.g., ERP and CRM), providing users with an interactive two-way mobile experience. Users can change data on the fly, insert new information, and view updated reports and dashboards. Users can access transactional inputs and forms regardless of internet connectivity. When offline, transactions are queued for submission and executed when the user next connects.

Extending information throughout an organization. MicroStrategy Mobile can help run a business more effectively by extending the reach of critical enterprise systems to all constituents in all locations. It can provide real-time access to the latest information and data-driven reports and dashboards that fuel spontaneous conversations and more effective decision making.

Enabling field workforces with multimedia materials and training. Mobile workforces can access anything from product brochures and sales presentations to instructional videos and training manuals, when and where they’re needed. MicroStrategy Mobile supports in-app viewing of multimedia content, such as videos, PDFs, images, presentations, spreadsheets, documents, email, and web content—all seamlessly embedded within a mobile app. As with other app content, multimedia content can be pre-cached or stored for convenient, offline access. When the mobile device is offline, users can still view files that have been previously downloaded and stored on their mobile device.

Proactive alerting of potential business problems. MicroStrategy Mobile supports personalized mobile alerts—informing users of potential business problems so they can take timely corrective action. The 24/7 alerting engine is based on a robust distribution server that can be set up to monitor multiple data sources in near real time, creating personalized alerts—distributed through the mobile device’s native push notification system—when a preset condition (threshold) has been met.

Conducting business in newer and faster ways. MicroStrategy Mobile context-aware apps that leverage native mobile device functionality (e.g., GPS, camera, etc.) allow users to complete tasks significantly faster or in more efficient ways than web or desktop-bound apps.

Fast app development. MicroStrategy Mobile is one of the fastest ways to create new mobile apps and mobile front-ends to existing analytics applications. Its click-to-configure features allow the development of mobile apps in a code free environment without requiring an organization’s IT resources. It also allows for the deployment of native apps across multiple operating systems with a single design and lets a user make an app multi-lingual with a few configuration clicks.

High performance mobilization. MicroStrategy Mobile provides compelling and high-performance MicroStrategy Mobile powered apps that can help maximize impact, durability, and adoption.

MicroStrategy Mobile Releases in 2017

MicroStrategy Mobile includes the following significant functional enhancements made during 2017:

Support for .SHP files for custom shapes on iOS. Previously, MicroStrategy Mobile allowed users to add custom shapes using .KML shapes in the map widget. Users can now also use .SHP files to deploy custom shapes and areas maps. This parity with MicroStrategy Web provides consistent user experience and behavior across different web and iOS interfaces.

Best-fit image auto-selected based on device resolution on Android. Android app designers can now define multiple resolutions for images in their dashboards and allow the Android device to auto-select the best-fit image depending on its own resolution. With so many different Android devices in the market, this responsive design capability makes it easier for Android app developers to optimize user experience.

Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) support via AppConfig (formerly known as ACE) on Android. In addition to our native integration support with AirWatch, MicroStrategy Mobile now


provides native integration to configure and help secure Android apps based on AppConfig guidelines. The integration with AppConfig provides more consistent, open and simple ways to configure and help secure mobile apps.

App Transport Security (ATS) on iOS. Apple’s new ATS policy improves user security and privacy by requiring apps to use secure network connections over HTTPS instead of HTTP. MicroStrategy Mobile developers can enable Apple’s ATS policy when Apple requires it to help ensure connections from the app adhere to the HTTPS standard. This feature helps app developers secure data in transit through additional encryption.  

MicroStrategy Mobile SDK for Blackberry Dynamics Library. Following Blackberry’s integration of Good Dynamics into its EMM platform, the MicroStrategy Mobile iOS SDK for Blackberry Dynamics now reflects Blackberry’s branding changes, including color schemes, icons, and much more. These changes improve user experience and enhance integration of the Good Dynamics and Blackberry libraries. Through the new SDK, MicroStrategy Mobile customers can continue to natively integrate with the former Good Dynamics.

Custom properties for D3 visualizations on Android. Custom properties are now supported in D3 visualizations. This feature provides greater parity with iOS and web report and dashboard functionality. App designers have the flexibility to add different properties to attribute elements and metrics. For example, app designers can use shape or text color to differentiate various components of their visualizations.

Embedded images during Android app compilation. The Android framework supports bundling images as part of the app resources to boost performance. Bundling images during app compilation eliminates requests for downloading images that are not expected to change in the short term. This feature accelerates app performance through better image loading. This is especially helpful when users are located in a remote area with weak network conditions.

MicroStrategy Library for iPad and Android tablet. Users can consume reports, dashboards, and dossiers via native mobile clients for iPad and Android tablets.

o

Quickly toggle between different MicroStrategy Library environments. Instead of re-configuring the app each time, users can store multiple environment configurations in the MicroStrategyLibrary app. With two quick taps, users can easily switch between the different environments. For users that regularly access reports, dashboards, and dossiers in separate libraries, this feature provides significant convenience and time savings. The MicroStrategyLibrary app also includes folders to access downloaded .mstr files and PDF exports. Instead of saving these files outside of the app, the folders provide a convenient place to store and view downloaded reports, dashboards, and dossiers within the app.

o

Export to PDF. Users can export entire dossiers or single chapters of dossiers to PDF.

o

Share via native extensions. Users can share links to dossiers, .mstr files and PDFs from the Dossier app using native OS extensions. iOS and Android users can share by emailing, printing, copying, using communicators such as Slack and AirDrop (only iOS users), or importing to other apps (e.g., iBook, Dropbox).

o

Enhance workflows with native touch-optimized controls. Users can take advantage of native touch-optimized gestures to manipulate content within their dossiers. Using long swipes, users can sort charts in ascending or descending order. Long and/or double taps display a filtering menu with “keep only,” “exclude,” or “drill” options. Users can also use free form lasso options to multi-select elements in visualizations. Native touch-optimized controls provide users with more advanced options to interact with dossiers.

o

Search within maps.Users can search for attribute elements on maps directly from their iPads or Android tablets. The searched element is highlighted on the map and provides users with location and other information instantly. If the searched element is within a cluster, the whole cluster is highlighted and the number of elements found within the cluster is specified. This feature—


previously available only on MicroStrategy Web—adds parity between MicroStrategy Web and MicroStrategy Mobile applications, providing users with a seamless map search interface.

o

Automatically align to various form factors with enhanced responsive design capabilities. The Dossier mobile app provides significantly enhanced responsive design capabilities, making the experience seamless when switching between interfaces, devices and form factors. Dossier components, such as visualizations, filters, images, and notification panels are automatically resized and arranged for optimal display on iPads and Android tablets. Though there are several form factors and aspect ratios, MicroStrategy Mobile prioritizes the visualizations view by adjusting spacing and padding and object alignment.

o

Leverage AppConfig on iOS and Android.The MicroStrategy Library apps for iOS and Android have been compiled using AppConfig guidelines. Without employing an SDK, customers can deploy the application to their users securely as well as configure it remotely via any of the leading EMM vendors compatible with AppConfig standards.intelligence.

MicroStrategy Services

MicroStrategy Mobile Technology Strategy

We continue to invest in enhancing MicroStrategy Mobile to empower our customers with the ability to build apps that drive their businesses forward and deliver revolutionary applications to their employees, business partners, prospects, and customers. We continue to invest in enhancing MicroStrategy Mobile’s overall performance and security as well as its three core capability areas: analytics, transactions, and multimedia. We remain focused on delivering the most compelling native end user experience on devices that are adopted by enterprises. New features specific to supported operating systems will take advantage of the native API’s and incorporate new OS capabilities into apps built by our customers.

We also continue to invest in bringing to life mobile apps in an easy, fast, and flexible way. We will continue to enhanceThrough our MicroStrategy Mobile technologySupport, MicroStrategy Consulting, and MicroStrategy Education services, we help customers better leverage our platform by offering a comprehensive set of innovative services to deliver an experience that is philosophically “user first” by combining a powerful user experience on top of a dynamicdeploy, optimize, and accessible development infrastructure.

Usher

Usher is a digital credential and identity intelligence offering that provides a highly secure, convenient way for organizations to dematerialize traditional forms of identity verification (such as passwords, tokens, and physical badges) and replace them with unique mobile identity badges, each cryptographically linked to its owner’s smartphone and dynamically linked to the enterprise’s existing identity repositories. Usher can be used as a powerful enterprise productivity and workforce management resource because it is designed to enable managers to gain an almost real-time window into the location and activity ofmaintain their distributed workforces, while providing powerful interactive features to manage or direct them. With the addition of Usher Professional, administrators can track user activity on a nearly real-time map using access telemetry.  They can also engage in two-way communications with users from the Usher application.  Usher badges work on standard smartphones running on iOS or the Android platform and include an Apple Watch integration.  Through the use of Bluetooth, QR codes, biometrics, push notifications, time-limited PIN codes, and other authentication methods, Usher users can log into applications, VPNs, and workstations, unlock doors and other physical gateways, and validate each other’s identities.  By delivering strong, multi-factor authentication that can be extended to nearly every corporate system, Usher’s digital credential solution addresses some of the biggest challenges facing corporations today, including authentication, identity and access management, and resource authorization, while applying industry leading business intelligence platform.


MicroStrategy Support

Our global network of MicroStrategy-certified support experts brings a wealth of experience and analytics to an enterprise’s infrastructure. Usher is available both as on-premise software and as a hosted service offering in MicroStrategy Cloud.

Usher can appeal to businesses, universities, associations, governments, and other organizations because it adds a layer of security to their systems, physical spaces, and transactions that would otherwise be technically difficult or cost-prohibitive. Usher is designed to secure an enterprise by offering an alternative to existing forms of identification and authentication.  Usher is designed to provide a more secure alternative to passwords, which can be stolen or cracked.  Usher is also designedknowledge to help reduce identity-related fraud by replacing physical ID cards that can be counterfeitedcustomers achieve their system availability and stolen.


Key benefits of Usher include:

Identity protection.Usher mobile identities are designeduptime goals and to be more secure than traditional physical forms of identity, which can be stolen and counterfeited.

Authentication. Usher is designed to provide a more secure alternative to passwords — which can be the weak link exploited by cybercrime attacks — with secure mobile identities.

Physical access control.Usher users can unlock doors by tapping on a “digital key” or by scanning a QR code. If a device is Bluetooth-enabled, a user can unlock a door simply by approaching it.

Workforce management. Usher can collect data about the locations of users’ Usher activity, enabling managers to remotely monitor and direct distributed workforces.

Activity analysis.Usher uses MicroStrategy 10 to monitor and analyze Usher user activity.

Convenience and cost-effectiveness. Usher allows users to carry their business credentials in digital form on their smartphones. Enterprises can reduce costs associated with the distribution and management of physical badges, cards, and keys, as well as the costs associated with identity-related fraud and cybercrime.

Usher Releases in 2017

Usher includes the following significant functional enhancements made during 2017:

Usher privacy controls. Administrators can tailor their deployments to protect their users’ privacy, giving organizations the flexibility to balance desired functionality with required data collection. Usher privacy controls include transaction location information, Bluetooth discovery, and the Usher telemetry feed to Usher Analytics.

Shared kiosk capability for multi-user authentication. Usher now enables rapid authentication of multiple users in a shared workstation (terminal) or tablet environment. Multiple users can be paired with a single browser or web application for use cases as diverse as reception areas, retail stores, healthcare providers, and utility workers.

NFC for iOS devices. Now both Android and iOS device owners can enjoy the security and convenience of using NFC tags to access resources, which has the advantage of explicitly signaling the user’s intent to access the resource due to its very short range. Usher supports NFC tags on iPhone 7, iPhone 7 Plus, and iPhone 8 devices running iOS 11. Type 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 NFC tags are supported.

Usher master administrator role. Usher Network Manager™ adds a new master administrator role, supporting separation of duties and improved user administrator capabilities.

Search and filter on directory attribute groups. Increase the value of Usher Professional as an enterprise directory and communications tool, while leveraging existing directories. All directory gateway attributes mapped in Usher Network Manager are searchable, including directory groups and distribution lists.

Universal scanner. The Usher Security™ badge client’s integrated QR scanner can now read non-Usher barcodes and QR codes (e.g., Aztec codes). The scanning transaction can be stored in the Usher server and linked to the user performing the scan, the time of the scan, and the location at which the scan took place (if location services are enabled). This barcode data can be used in Usher Analytics to parse barcode data, create derived attributes from the parsed barcode data, and link to third-party and legacy-backend logical systems to generate custom reports and dashboards.

Usher Network Manager: Okta Universal Directory support.Usher now supports Okta Universal Directory as an identity management source. This is in addition to existing support for Microsoft Active Directory, OpenLDAP, AWS Directory Services, Novell NDS (NetIQ eDirectory), Apple Open Directory, and Apache Directory.

Usher Analytics: Badge properties reporting. With a new out-of-the-box dashboard and schema, badge properties set by Usher Network Manager can require and report on end-user action or compliance, such


as location services and Bluetooth enablement, photo uploads, multiple device installations, and acceptance of the Terms of Use.

Usher inbox. With the debut of the Usher inbox, communications sent from managers and administrators via Usher Professional are accessible to recipients in an inbox within the app, so users can read and respond to queries at their leisure. Users can even review messages that they have already replied to in the past. The Usher inbox enhances user convenience andimprove the overall communications usability of Usher Professional messaging for purposes such as safetycustomer experience through highly responsive troubleshooting and productivity.

Usher Analytics: New out-of-the-box dashboard. Visualize Usher badge-generated telemetry through a set of KPI intensive grids. As users move about and interact with a corporate environment using their Usher badges, data flows into the dashboard sorted under categories such as users, historical telemetry log, timesheet, floors, spaces, beacons, actions, applications, cities, and devices. These grids can be used as a basis for creating custom visualizations based on business questions surrounding user access and presence.

Nearby user auto-discovery. Usher Professional users can control the mannerproactive technical product support. Standard support is included in which lists of nearby Usher badge users are discovered and/or refreshed. Usher Professional may be configured to display location-based lists of Usher badge users that are either dynamic or static. When configured for dynamic display, Usher Professional provides a list of nearby Usher users (based on selected filter criteria) and automatically updates this list over time.

Usher Network Manager: Approver role for badge issuance / reactivation. Enterprises require separation of duties across many roles to mitigate the danger of a single employee taking unauthorized actions. Badge issuance approvers are responsible for reviewing badges that are ready to be issued prior to their issuance. Before approving or rejecting a badge issuance, they can review the identity record, including biographic and biometric data, and enter notes (e.g., a case number, background check results, etc.) to explain their decision.

Usher Technology Strategy  

Our technology strategy for Usher is focused on taking advantage of developments in mobile and cloud technology to provide more flexible and powerful user identity-based security and analytics solutions. This involves continued development in the following areas:

Logical access. We continue to explore new techniques with which Usher can provide identity to applications and systems and provide alternatives to passwords, keys, and fobs.  Our focus is on seamless, zero-click access based on proximity.  Additionally, we continue to monitor the market and test new biometric measurement systems that can be integrated into Usher, such as Apple’s Touch ID, voice authentication, and facial recognition.

Physical access. We continue to expand on the integration of Usher with physical access control systems and hardware, so that users with adequate credentials and digital keys can unlock secure doorways.

Action-oriented intelligence. We are focusing on enhancing Usher’s ability to determine Usher member location and activities so that trends and anomalies can be used to provide better security or better workforce management.

MicroStrategy on AWS

MicroStrategy on AWS is a self-service, customer-managed solution that offerseach customer’s maintenance plan.  For additional services, customers instant access to a comprehensive enterprise cloud platform. Organizations can launch fully configured and ready-to-use MicroStrategy analytics and mobility projects on their own. Administrators have total control of their environments, making it easy to start, stop, resize, and terminate as needed. MicroStrategy on AWS provides access to the latest features and capabilities, while delivering a low total cost of ownership.


Key benefits of MicroStrategy on AWS include:

Simplified enterprise deployment. With just a few clicks, organizations can deploy fully configured enterprise environments. Most instances can be up and running in just 30 minutes. This saves users time and money by eliminating the need to download, install, and configure environments themselves. Users can choose from different instance types and sizes based on their budget and usage requirements.

Centralized administration. Customers that deploy a project using MicroStrategy on AWS can dynamically start, stop, restart, and resize their environments. Organizations can reduce costs by stopping their environments during non-peak hours.

Scalability. Scaling MicroStrategy on AWS environments is quick and easy. Customers can choose from six different instance size options ranging from 4 vCPU and 15.25 GiB to 64 vCPU and 488 GiB of memory. Environments can be scaled on demand or on a preset schedule based on usage patterns or data size. Organizations can add new users at any time, deploy multiple environments and projects as they see fit, and pay only for what they use.

API-enabled operations. APIs are available with MicroStrategy on AWS to provide broad flexibility for organizations to create customized workflows. Developers can build personalized user interfaces for deploying, managing, and automating their cloud environments. The APIs also easily integrate with other automation tools and work with any programming language. With the APIs, it is possible to launch multiple MicroStrategy instances with a single line of code, resize them as needed, and terminate them when they are no longer required.

Global availability. Leveraging AWS, MicroStrategy Analytics is now available in all AWS data centers.

MicroStrategy on AWS Releases in 2017

MicroStrategy on AWS includes the following significant functional enhancements made during 2017:

Web-based provisioning console. New to MicroStrategy on AWS, a web-based provisioning console allows administrators to quickly and easily deploy and manage a fully configured MicroStrategy project using a simple and intuitive web-based deployment manager.

Seamless hotfix upgrades. With the general availability of any hotfix release, the hotfix will be automatically available on the MicroStrategy on AWS provisioning tool. An upgrade button will appear on the main administrative page, and clicking on it will automatically validate the upgrade process and administrators can then choose to upgrade at that time or schedule the upgrade at an off-peak time.

Deploy MicroStrategy on AWS into existing Virtual Private Cloud (VPC). Customers can deploy, manage, upgrade and resize their MicroStrategy on AWS environments within their own VPC and still leverage the powerful deployment and management tool. Deploying MicroStrategy on AWS into existing VPC accounts gives customers full control of their own AWS security settings.

Deploy applications directly into data centers around the world. MicroStrategy on AWS now allows organizations to deploy the application directly into data centers in North America, Europe, Australia, and Asia. The availability of data centers in these new regions allows organizations to deploy in a data center close to home, so they can deliver faster response times for mission-critical KPIs.

Available in nine languages. In addition to expanding the list of data centers around the world, the MicroStrategy on AWS provisioning tool is now available in nine different languages: English, French, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish, Dutch, Japanese, Korean, and Chinese.

Automatic architecture updates.Each time MicroStrategy pushes out a new architectural design, we automatically upgrade the underlying AWS CloudFormation template so the next time an organization deploys a new environment, it’s on the latest MicroStrategy architecture.

Now deployed on Amazon Linux. MicroStrategy on AWS is now deployed on Amazon Linux. Amazon Linux offers better support, costs less and is highly integrated within the AWS ecosystem.


Center for Internet Security (CIS) baselines. MicroStrategy follows CIS best practices to help mitigate cyber risks and protect customer data.

MicroStrategy Cloud

MicroStrategy Cloud offers an integrated and optimized cloud business analytics platform that combines infrastructure, technology, people, and processes to offer analytics as a service to our customers. MicroStrategy Cloud builds on MicroStrategy 10, and adds class-leading ETL and database technology to provide an agile, high performance, elastic, and cost-effective analytics platform.

MicroStrategy Cloud provides our customers MicroStrategy 10 offerings through a Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) solution hosted in the cloud. In addition to MicroStrategy Analytics and MicroStrategy Mobile, MicroStrategy Cloud also offers data integration ETL and data hosting services. The MicroStrategy Cloud PaaS provides customers with infrastructure (data center space, rack space, power, cooling, and servers), technology platforms (analytics, mobile data integration, and data hosting), operations, support, and expert analytics practitioners for a subscription fee with no upfront capital investment. MicroStrategy Cloud can offer improved time to market, higher performance, and lower overall total cost of ownership compared to traditional on-premise deployments.

Key benefits of MicroStrategy Cloud include:

Agile rapid application development and secure deployment.MicroStrategy Cloud provides the infrastructure, technology, processes, and experts that a customer needs to develop and securely deploy applications quickly. The entire service has been pre-packaged and optimized, and is supported by expert analytics practitioners. This solution allows our customers to get to market much more quickly than traditional approaches and react to business changes as they happen.

High performance analytics applications. MicroStrategy Cloud combines the high performance characteristics of MicroStrategy Analytics and MicroStrategy Mobile with high performance servers and network infrastructure. This integration allows our customers to deploy analytics and mobile applications on demand, allowing them to serve their customers more quickly and efficiently.

Elastic capacity with no capital investment. MicroStrategy Cloud allows customers to get started with no upfront capital investment in infrastructure. Customers can start small and increase their capacity on demand.

Low overall total cost of ownership.IT application costs are driven by capital investments and the personnel cost associated with hiring a staff of experts to build, maintain, and tune a large-scale environment. MicroStrategy Cloud delivers this high performance, tuned, and monitored environment as a service, lowering overall total cost of ownership.

MicroStrategy on AWS and MicroStrategy Cloud Technology Strategy

MicroStrategy on AWS and MicroStrategy Cloud each offers organizations an alternate purchase and deployment model for business analytics, compared to traditional on-premise deployments. Instead of making large upfront capital investments and building large support teams, MicroStrategy on AWS and MicroStrategy Cloud allow organizations to purchase analytics as a service with no upfront capital investments and offer payment structures that scale with business requirements.

Our MicroStrategy on AWS and MicroStrategy Cloud technology strategy is focused on continuing to enhance the reliability, self-service, performance, and scalabilityone of our offerings. We also seek to differentiate our offerings by investing in enhancing the security processthree premium support options – extended support, premier support, or elite support. With these premium support options, customers can receive extended coverage and infrastructure around our services, monitoring existing security and compliance certifications, and obtaining new certifications.

MicroStrategy Services™

MicroStrategy Services consists of MicroStrategy Consulting™, MicroStrategy Education™, and MicroStrategy Technical Support.  MicroStrategy Services advises, assists and supports our customers in successfully leveraging


the MicroStrategy platform to achieve enterprise intelligence.  Through this three-pronged combination, we help our customers realize the vision of the Intelligent Enterprise™ and the creation of an intelligence platform.enhanced service at each touchpoint.

MicroStrategy Consulting

We believe our consulting services materially complement our software by increasing customer adoption and helping our customers achieve returns on investment derived from better understanding their data.  Many companies want to better utilize their data to provide actionable insights but lack the internal expertise to define requirements and deliver solutions.  MicroStrategy Consulting provides our customers with assessment, advisory, architecture and deployment expertiseimplementation services to help drivethem quickly realize results. Our consultants serve as critical analyticsresources for operations and mobile solutions across key industries. We utilizemaintenance and end-to-end, full-lifecycle projects that develop, deploy, and operate our deep expertise, thought leadership, and extensive MicroStrategy resourcescustomers’ business intelligence environments. With thousands of successful projects delivered to customers worldwide spanning all major industries, our consultants apply industry best practices to guide our customers in defining, developing, and delivering core business analytics solutions for their enterprises. These solutions provide our customers with greater access to critical business information and help them make better business decisions faster.  MicroStrategy consultants work with the backing of the MicroStrategy product engineering, technical support and account teams to continue to partner with customers to help ensure a high adoption rate, positive ROI, and increased BI maturity.  Our team is rigorously trained and certified on capabilities of the MicroStrategy platform.

solutions.  MicroStrategy Consulting is aoperates worldwide organization with operations inacross North America, Latin America, South America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific delivering projects to customers across all major industries. Ourregion, with consultants from our local offices and our Global Delivery Center™ (“GDC”), locatedCenter in Warsaw, Poland, is a hub of several hundred consultants who support analytics and mobile projects directly at customer sites around the world or remotely. With functional and business management practices, the appropriate experts can transition on and off projects as needed.  The GDC can quickly scale up or down to meet unique technical and industry requirements.  Integrating the GDC with on-site project resources is a flexible and cost-efficient way to receive highly specialized services.Poland.

MicroStrategy Education

We believe the path to the Intelligent Enterprise involves skill-specific paths of learning. To help organizations maximize the utility, adoption, and performance of their MicroStrategy deployments, MicroStrategy Education offers users a personalized plan to expand their knowledgefree and skill sets and help them build and optimize their organization’s intelligence center.  Keypaid learning options. MicroStrategy Education initiatives include:

Free education.  We offer free education through our Jump Start program. 30,000 registrations later, the program continues to attract users interested in learning about business intelligence and MicroStrategy. Each day of the five-day program is structured to stand on its own, allowing users to attend any one or all five days. Currently, the program is available worldwide in ninemultiple languages in over 40 cities worldwide and online.a variety of formats.

Quarterly updated educational content. We update educational content to reflect our quarterly software releases, customer feedbackAnalytics Software and best practices to help ensure users are learning how to leverage the latest MicroStrategy features and functionalities. As our platform evolves, we continuously improve our suite of courses and certifications so users have access to the latest information.

Certifying intelligence centers.  We provide role-specific project certifications for employees within an organization’s intelligence center so they can serve as trusted MicroStrategy advisors. We offer the following options to help users get trained and certified:

Certify at your own pace: Our course schedule delivers the most popular certifications and certification projects on a frequent basis, enabling organizations to build a training and certification schedule that works for their specific enterprise requirements.

Fast track: An efficient and expedited certification program that compresses a lot of knowledge into a short amount of time. Depending on a user’s role, level and certification need, a user can expect to become certified in five to ten days.

Self-paced E-courseware learning.  For organizations wanting to get a large number of analysts up and running within a few hours of training, we offer E-courseware modules. Our E-courseware modules are the most cost-effective and efficient option to get users proficient on MicroStrategy. We have made significant investments in our portfolio of E-courseware modules with 10 of our most popular courses now available as self-paced modules.


Course customization.  We can customize course content around an organization’s data and how it uses the data to make decisions. Content can be personalized to reflect a customer’s brand and its datasets, and tie it into real-world applications and benefits. Customized courses offer users the information and specific skill sets they need to boost their performance and help ensure their organization is making the most of its training.

MicroStrategy Technical Support

MicroStrategy Technical Support is focused on improving the overall customer experience through proactive technical product support for customers and business partners across MicroStrategy’s software products.  Additionally, it is responsible for negotiating and maintaining support contracts with our customers and business partners alike, including support services for MicroStrategy Cloud customers.  MicroStrategy Technical Support includes the following groups:

Customer Support Group (CSG).  CSG is a team of Technical Support Engineers responsible for providing first level technical support to customers, business partners, and prospects.

Premium Support.  Premium Support is a team of Premium Support Engineers that provides dedicated technical support to our elite customers and business partners.

Customer Success Management (CSM). CSM manages our support renewal business and our process for renewing software maintenance contracts with customers worldwide. It also helps answer questions from customers while working with those customers on renewing their maintenance contracts. The team also works with customers quarterly to ascertain the customer’s on-going satisfaction level.Services Strategy

Sales and Services Strategy  

We primarilyMicroStrategy sells its platform in two basic ways. The first way is to sell product licenses to customers for them to deploy the platform on their infrastructure either on premises or in the customer’s cloud environment. The second way is to sell customers MCE, a cloud subscription service, so they can access our software in a cloud environment that is hosted and managed by us. In November 2020, we also introduced a new HyperIntelligence cloud subscription service offering, called Hyper.Now. Hyper.Now allows anybody to launch a HyperIntelligence environment, hosted by MicroStrategy, directly from our website. Revenues from product license sales comprise product licenses revenues, and revenues from cloud subscriptions comprise subscription services revenues. Currently, the vast majority of our product sales are license sales.

MicroStrategy sells through our dedicated enterprise sales force as well as throughand channel partners in order to increase market coverage in both domestic and international markets.  We provide financial incentives for our channel partners to market and distribute our products and services.  We also offer a comprehensive set of educational programs that enhance our potential customers’ and channel partners’ understanding of our software.  Furthermore,offerings.  In addition, we offer a wide range of services that provide support in the discovery, planning, development, and deployment stages of a MicroStrategy product or service.offering.

Dedicated sales force.Sales Force

We market our software and servicesofferings chiefly through our direct sales force.  We have sales offices in locations throughout the world.  Weworld and use distributorschannel partners in several countries where we do not have sales offices.


Channel Partners

Channel partners.We have established strategic alliances with third partythird-party vendors to help ensure the success of our customers’ businessenterprise intelligence initiatives. Our channel partners are system integrators, consulting firms, resellers, solution providers, managed service providers, OEMs,original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), and technology companies. These firms utilize the MicroStrategy platformsplatform for a variety of commercial purposes, and our agreements with them generally provide non-exclusive rights to market our products and servicesofferings and allow access to our marketing materials, product training, and direct sales force for field-level assistance.

We make significant commitments to our channel partners, including investments in joint development including technical training, and certifications, pre-sales and sales enablement, and marketing programs. Through our joint efforts, we believe customers are able to minimize their risk and maximize the return on their business intelligence projects. We believe that ourOur channel partners allow us to leverage sales and service resources as well asand marketing and industry-specific expertise to expand our user base and increase our market coverage.

Marketing Strategy

Our marketing programs target the following principal constituencies:

Our historical base of corporate technology buyers and departmental technology buyers across FORTUNE™ Global 2000 enterprises.  We also target senior executives and other leaders in these companies for MicroStrategy Mobile and Usher;

Corporate and departmental technology buyers in mid-sized enterprises;


our historical base of enterprise-wide operational and technology executives and departmental buyers across large global enterprises;

 

Governmentcorporate and departmental technology buyers in mid-sized enterprises;

government technology buyers and the vendors to the government community;

Independent software vendors that want to embed our technology tools in their solutions; and

independent software vendors that want to embed our technology tools in their solutions; and

System integrators that have technology relationships with the largest enterprises, governments, and information-intensive businesses.

system integrators that have technology relationships with large enterprises, governments, and information-intensive businesses.

We continually seek to increase our brand awareness by focusing our messaging on the possibilities for value creation, and the benefits of using our platforms,platform, and competitive differentiators. The channels we use to communicate with these constituencies include:

User conferences;

Advertising;

Direct email;

Freeinclude digital and social media, advertising, free and evaluation software;

Industry awards;

Industry events;

Media coverage;

Mobile application downloads;

Our website;

Social media;

Channel partners;software, events, media coverage, channel partners, and

Word of mouth word-of-mouth and peer references.

Each quarter in 2017, we hosted symposia events in cities across North America, Europe, the Middle East, Asia, Africa, and South America. These events offered IT and business users an opportunity to network, attend workshops, and learn about real-world MicroStrategy 10 applications from our customers. These events also featured topics on analytics and mobile applications in retail, banking, higher education, healthcare and other sectors being transformed by Big Data. We will continue to host symposia events where we will highlight opportunities to drive the adoption of business intelligence across organizations, reduce costs through tool consolidation, and empower the workforce to be more productive – all of which can help attendees plan and achieve their analytics goals.

Customers

Our customers include leading companies from a wide range of industries, including retail, consulting, technology, manufacturing, banking, insurance, finance, healthcare, telecommunications, as well as the public sector. These industries include retail, consulting, technology, manufacturing, finance, banking, insurance, healthcare, education, telecommunications, and many more.

Competition

MicroStrategy Analytics, MicroStrategy on AWS and MicroStrategy Cloud Competitors

The analytics market is highly competitive and subject to rapidly changing technology paradigms.technology.  Within the analytics space, we compete with many different software vendors, including (i) large software vendors, such as IBM, (Cognos), SAP (BO), Microsoft, (Power BI™),Oracle, Qlik, Salesforce, and Oracle (OBIEE), that provide one or more products that directly compete with our products, (ii) open source analytics vendors such as OpenText™ Analytics and Hitachi (Pentaho®), (iii) various other analytics software providers, such as Qlik™, Tableau Software®, TIBCO®, Information Builders®, and the SAS Institute, and (iv) other vendors offering cloud-based offerings, such as GoodData and Birst, an Infor Company.SAP.  Our future success depends on the effectiveness with which we canour ability to differentiate our offerings and successfully compete with these vendors and other potential competitors across analytics implementation projects of varying sizes.  

Our ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, both within and outside of our control.  Some of these factors include software deployment options; analytical, mobility, data discovery, and visualization capabilities; performance and scalability; the quality and reliability of our customer service and support; and brand recognition.  Failure to maintain adequate technology differentiation fromcompete successfully in any one of these competitors couldor other areas may reduce the demand for our offerings and materially adversely affect our revenue from both existing and prospective customers.

Key Differentiators

A comprehensive, modern, and open enterprise analytics and mobility platform uniquely featuring HyperIntelligence, transformational mobility, and federated analytics.


Our exclusive and patented HyperIntelligence capabilities that inject contextual analytics into existing tools, websites, and online workflows.

Our proprietary Enterprise Semantic Graph.

Over 200 connectors to popular drivers and gateways to enterprise assets.

A comprehensive set of REST APIs that makes it easy to embed the platform in packaged and custom applications, workflows, and devices.

Flexible deployment methods that allow our customers to deploy our platform efficiently and securely using their own hardware or in a cloud environment they manage or via the MCE, our cloud subscription service.

Comprehensive platform administration, security, and architecture, including role-based access to both row and column data.

A platform that is designed to scale with large datasets and deliver rapid response times.

Government Regulation

Aspects of our business involve collecting, processing, disclosing, storing, and transmitting personal data, which are subject to certain privacy policies, contractual obligations, and U.S. and foreign laws, regulations, and directives relating to privacy and data protection. We store a substantial amount of customer and employee data, including personal data, on our networks and other systems and the cloud environments we manage. In addition, the types of data subject to protection as personal data in the European Union, the United States, and elsewhere have been expanding. In recent years, the collection and use of personal data by companies have come under increased regulatory and public scrutiny, especially in relation to the collection and processing of sensitive data, such as healthcare, biometric, genetic, financial services, and children’s data, precise location data, and data regarding a person’s race or ethnic origins, political opinions, or religious beliefs.  For example, in the United States, protected health information is subject to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), which can provide for civil and criminal penalties for noncompliance. Entities (such as us) that engage in creating, receiving, maintaining, or transmitting protected health information provided by covered entities and other business associates are subject to enforcement under HIPAA.  Our access to protected health information triggers obligations to comply with certain privacy rules and data security requirements under HIPAA.

In the European Union, the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) imposes requirements regarding the handling and security of personal data, requires disclosure of data breaches to individuals, customers, and data protection authorities in certain circumstances, requires companies to honor data subjects’ requests relating to their personal data, permits regulators to impose fines of up to €20,000,000 or 4% of global annual revenue, whichever is higher, and establishes a private right of action.  Furthermore, a new ePrivacy Regulation, regulating electronic communications, was proposed in 2017 and is under consideration by the European Commission, the European Parliament, and the European Council. More recently, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) invalidated the U.S.-EU Privacy Shield in July 2020.  The U.S.-EU Privacy Shield provided a mechanism to lawfully transfer personal data from the European Union to the United States and certain other countries.  In the wake of the invalidation of the U.S.-EU Privacy Shield, we have transitioned to reliance on the EU Standard Contractual Clauses (“SCCs”) to lawfully transfer certain personal data from the European Union to the United States. The rules involving this alternative data transfer option are also undergoing revision and this transfer mechanism may also be declared invalid (or require us to change our business practices) in the future, requiring us to provide an alternative means of data transfer.

Brazil also enacted the Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados (the Brazilian General Data Protection Law), which became effective in August 2020 and imposes requirements largely similar to GDPR on products and services offered to users in Brazil.  We may also be subject in China to the Cybersecurity Law that went into effect in June 2017 and a revision of the Personal Information Security Specification that went into effect in October 2020, which have uncertain but broad application and impose a number of new privacy and data security obligations. China is also considering new legislation on the protection of privacy and personal data, including a Personal Information Protection Law and a Data Security Law that may impose new obligations on us. Other countries are considering new or expanded laws governing privacy and data security that may impact our business practices.


MicroStrategy Mobile CompetitorsThe state of California has also adopted a new comprehensive privacy law, the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), which took effect in January 2020 and became enforceable in July 2020.  We may be required to devote substantial resources to implement and maintain compliance with the CCPA, and noncompliance could result in regulatory investigations and fines or private litigation. Moreover, in November 2020, California voters approved a new privacy law, the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”), which amends the CCPA to create new privacy rights and obligations in California. Several other states are also considering bills similar to the CCPA or other generally applicable privacy laws that may impose additional costs and obligations on us.

The marketFurthermore, the U.S. Congress is considering comprehensive privacy legislation. At this time, it is unclear whether Congress will pass such a law and if so, when and what it will require and prohibit.  Moreover, it is not clear whether any such legislation would give the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) any new authority to impose civil penalties for mobile analytics is rapidly evolving. New mobile devices are being introducedviolations of the Federal Trade Commission Act in the market atfirst instance, whether Congress will grant the FTC rulemaking authority over privacy and information security, or whether Congress will vest some or all privacy and data security regulatory authority and enforcement power in a rapid pace,new agency, akin to EU data protection authorities.

Bitcoin Acquisition Strategy

In September 2020, our Board of Directors adopted a Treasury Reserve Policy (as amended to date, the “Treasury Reserve Policy”) that updated our treasury management and enhancements to mobile operating systems are being madecapital allocation strategies, under which our treasury reserve assets will consist of:

cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments (“Cash Assets”) held by us that exceed working capital requirements;and

bitcoin held by us, with bitcoin serving as the primary treasury reserve asset on an ongoing basis, subject to market conditions and anticipated needs of the business for Cash Assets.

As part of these treasury management and capital allocation strategies, we purchased a total of approximately 70,469 bitcoin at an even faster rate. The rapidly changing technology landscape creates opportunitiesaggregate purchase price of approximately $1.125 billion in 2020 for both existing competitorsan average purchase price of approximately $15,964 per bitcoin, inclusive of fees and new vendorsexpenses. These purchases included purchases of bitcoin using the net proceeds of our issuance of $650.0 million aggregate principal amount of 0.750% Convertible Senior Notes due 2025 in the fourth quarter of 2020.

In 2021, we determined to introduce innovative new products. Within the mobile analytics space,adopt, in addition to and in conjunction with our Treasury Reserve Policy, a business strategy of purchasing bitcoin, and we predominantly competemay from time to time, subject to market conditions, issue debt or equity securities in capital raising transactions with the sameobjective of using the proceeds to purchase bitcoin. Under this business strategy we also periodically engage in activities to educate the market regarding bitcoin. We believe that our bitcoin strategy is complementary to our analytics software and services business, as we believe that our bitcoin and related activities in support of the bitcoin network enhance awareness of our brand and can provide opportunities to secure new customers for our analytics offerings. We are also exploring opportunities to apply bitcoin related technologies such as blockchain analytics into our software offerings.

We view our bitcoin holdings as long-term holdings and we do not plan to engage in regular trading of bitcoin or to hedge or otherwise enter into derivative contracts with respect to our bitcoin holdings, though we may sell bitcoins in future periods as needed to generate cash for treasury management and other general corporate purposes. We have not targeted any specific amount of bitcoin holdings, and we will continue to monitor market conditions in determining whether to conduct debt or equity financings to purchase additional bitcoin.

As of February 8, 2021, we held approximately 71,079 bitcoin that were acquired at an aggregate purchase price of $1.145 billion and an average purchase price of approximately $16,109 per bitcoin, inclusive of fees and expenses.

Overview of Bitcoin

Bitcoin is a digital asset that is issued by and transmitted through an open source protocol collectively maintained by a peer-to-peer network of decentralized user nodes. This network hosts a public transaction ledger, known as the bitcoin blockchain, on which bitcoin holdings and transactions in bitcoin are recorded. Balances of bitcoin are stored in individual “wallet” functions, which associate network public addresses with a “private key” that controls the transfer of bitcoin. The bitcoin blockchain can be updated without any single entity owning or operating the network.  New bitcoin is created and allocated by the protocol that governs bitcoin through a “mining” process that


rewards users that verify transactions in the bitcoin blockchain.  The bitcoin protocol limits the total issuance of bitcoin over time to 21 million.

Bitcoin can be used to pay for goods and services, or it can be converted to fiat currencies, such as the U.S. dollar, at rates of exchange determined by market forces on bitcoin trading platforms, which operate 24-hours-a-day, 7-days-a-week and are not regulated in as comprehensive a manner as traditional securities exchanges. As a result, trading on these markets is likely more subject to manipulation than on securities markets regulated by the SEC, and pricing on these markets is likely affected by such manipulative activity.  In addition to these platforms, over-the-counter markets and derivatives markets for bitcoin also exist; however, these markets are still maturing and many are unregulated.

Potential Advantages and Disadvantages of Holding Bitcoin

We believe that bitcoin is attractive because it can serve as a store of value, supported by a robust and public open source architecture, that is untethered to sovereign monetary policy and can therefore serve as a hedge against inflation.  Bitcoin exists entirely in electronic form, as virtually irreversible public transaction ledger entries on the blockchain, and transactions in bitcoin are recorded and authenticated not by a central repository, but by a decentralized peer-to-peer network.  This decentralization avoids certain threats common to centralized computer networks, such as denial of service attacks, and reduces the dependency of the bitcoin network on any single system.  While the bitcoin network as a whole is decentralized, the private keys used to access bitcoin balances are not widely distributed and are held on hardware (which can be physically controlled by the holder or by a third party such as a custodian) or via software programs on third-party servers and loss of such private keys results in an inability to access, and effective loss of, the corresponding bitcoin.  Consequently, bitcoin holdings are susceptible to all of the risks inherent in holding any electronic data, such as power failure, data corruption, security breach, communication failure, and user error, among others. These risks, in turn, make bitcoin subject to theft, destruction, or loss of value from hackers, corruption, or technology-specific factors such as viruses that do not affect conventional fiat currency.  In addition, the bitcoin network relies on open source developers to maintain and improve the bitcoin protocol. Accordingly, bitcoin may be subject to protocol design changes, governance disputes such as “forked” protocols, competing protocols, and other open source-specific risks that do not affect conventional proprietary software.

We believe that in the context of the economic and public health crisis precipitated by COVID-19 and the unprecedented government financial stimulus measures adopted around the world, decreasing interest rates, as well as the breakdown of trust in and between political institutions and political parties in the United States and globally, bitcoin represents a more attractive store of value than fiat currency, and further that opportunity for appreciation in the value of bitcoin exists in the event that such factors lead to even more widespread adoption of bitcoin as a treasury reserve alternative.  

Government Regulation

Activities involving bitcoin and other digital assets may fall within the jurisdiction of more than one financial regulator and are subject to U.S. federal, state and local laws, as well as laws of foreign jurisdictions where applicable. Businesses that are engaged in the transmission and custody of bitcoin and other digital assets, including brokers and custodians, can be subject to U.S. Treasury Department regulations as money services businesses as well as state money transmitter licensing requirements. Bitcoin and other digital assets are subject to anti-fraud regulations under federal and state commodity laws, and digital asset derivative instruments are substantively regulated by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Certain jurisdictions, including, among others, New York and a number of countries outside the United States, have developed regulatory requirements specifically for digital assets and companies that transact in them.  

In addition, since transactions in bitcoin provide a reasonable degree of pseudo anonymity, they are susceptible to misuse for criminal activities, such as money laundering. This misuse, or the perception of such misuse (even if untrue), could lead to greater regulatory oversight of bitcoin platforms, and there is the possibility that law enforcement agencies could close bitcoin platforms or other bitcoin-related infrastructure with little or no notice and prevent users from accessing or retrieving bitcoin held via such platforms or infrastructure.  For example, in her January 2021 nomination hearing before the Senate Finance Committee, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen noted that cryptocurrencies have the potential to improve the efficiency of the financial system but that they can be used to finance terrorism, facilitate money laundering, and support malign activities that threaten U.S. national security interests and the integrity of the U.S. and international financial systems.  Accordingly, Secretary Yellen expressed


her view that federal regulators needed to look closely at how to encourage the use of cryptocurrencies for legitimate activities while curtailing their use for malign and illegal activities.  Furthermore, in December 2020, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”), a unit of the Treasury Department focused on money laundering, proposed a new set of analytics vendorsrules for cryptocurrency-based exchanges aimed at reducing the use of cryptocurrencies for money laundering.  These proposed rules would require filing reports with FinCEN regarding cryptocurrency transactions in excess of $10,000 and also impose record-keeping requirements for cryptocurrency transactions in excess of $3,000 involving users who manage their own private keys.  In January 2021, the Biden Administration issued a memorandum freezing federal rulemaking, including these proposed FinCEN rules, to provide additional time for the Biden Administration to review the rulemaking that had been proposed by the Trump Administration.  As a result, it remains unclear whether these proposed rules will take effect.

Our Bitcoin Holdings

At December 31, 2020, we compete withcarried $1.054 billion of digital assets on our balance sheet, consisting of the approximately 70,469 bitcoins and reflecting $70.7 million in cumulative impairment losses attributable to bitcoin trading price fluctuations, and held $59.7 million in cash and cash equivalents, compared to no digital assets and $456.7 million in cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2019, reflecting the analytics market. Our competitivenessshift in this market will depend on how quicklyour liquid asset holdings following the adoption of our new Treasury Reserve Policy. As of February 8, 2021, we can adaptheld approximately 71,079 bitcoins that were acquired at an aggregate purchase price of $1.145 billion and an average purchase price of approximately $16,109 per bitcoin, inclusive of fees and expenses. We expect to the changing technology landscape and how effectivelypurchase additional bitcoin in future periods, though we may also sell market, and differentiate our offering.bitcoin in future periods as needed to generate Cash Assets for treasury management purposes.

Usher Competitors

Usher competes with companies with technologies categorized as user authentication products. These competitors focus primarily on traditional forms of identity verification such as smart cards, tokens, and password managers.  These companies have significant name recognition and offer solutions with security architectures that are familiar to IT buyers.  Usher also competes with companies with newer solutions, often involving mobile technology.

Employees

As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had a total of 2,2161,997 employees, of whom 1,100818 were based in the United States and 1,1161,179 were based internationally. Of our 2,216 employees, 652 were engaged in sales and marketing, 559 in research and development, 707 in subscription, product support, consulting, and education services, and 298 in finance, administration, and corporate operations. None of our employees in the United States is represented by a labor union; however, in certain foreign subsidiaries, some employees are members of trade or local unions.  In France, our employees are represented by a works council as required by local law. We have not experienced any work stoppages and consider our relations with our employees to be good.

The following table summarizes employee headcount as of the dates indicated:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

 

2017

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Subscription services

 

 

37

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

53

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

69

 

 

 

56

 

Product support

 

 

131

 

 

 

171

 

 

 

172

 

 

 

154

 

 

 

219

 

 

 

202

 

Consulting

 

 

467

 

 

 

453

 

 

 

441

 

 

 

393

 

 

 

392

 

 

 

452

 

Education

 

 

28

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

47

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

513

 

 

 

587

 

 

 

652

 

 

 

479

 

 

 

597

 

 

 

707

 

Research and development

 

 

461

 

 

 

512

 

 

 

559

 

 

 

642

 

 

 

743

 

 

 

716

 

General and administrative

 

 

310

 

 

 

323

 

 

 

298

 

 

 

243

 

 

 

338

 

 

 

348

 

Total headcount

 

 

1,947

 

 

 

2,133

 

 

 

2,216

 

 

 

1,997

 

 

 

2,396

 

 

 

2,528

 


 

ResearchWe recognize and Product Development

We maintain a dedicated performance engineering team and conduct research and development focused on providing our customers withvalue the highest levels of performance for analytics applicationscontribution of all sizesour employees. Due to their dedication, hard work, loyalty, and security solutions.  The descriptioncommitment, we have had continued success as a company.  Our philosophy is to create an agile, evolving environment that allows all of researchour employees to grow and development expenses in “Item 7. Management’s Discussionthrive, with initiatives and Analysis of Financial Conditionplatforms that reward and Results of Operations” includes a breakdown of such expenses. We believe that our future performance will depend in large partrecognize employees for their hard work and commitment to delivering personal excellence and creativity at MicroStrategy.

Our human capital management objectives are to attract, retain, and develop leading talent to deliver on our abilitybusiness strategies.  To accomplish these objectives, we constantly strive to maintainunderstand the drivers of attraction, retention, and sustainable engagement with our employees in each of the geographies in which we operate.  As part of this process, we regularly benchmark our employee offerings within our industry and local markets to provide a competitive advantage in aligning our core benefits while meeting employee local needs.  In addition, we pride ourselves on preparing a highly skilled workforce through technical boot camps, regular training workshops, and a variety of other learning experiences. Our initiative-driven teams work with a modern technology stack, and they meet and learn from some of the most experienced innovators in their field.  Through these efforts we seek to create an environment in which our employees can flourish, respond quickly to client demand and enhance our current product line, develop new products that achieve market acceptance, maintain technological competitiveness,their connections with colleagues and meet an expanding rangetowards the communities they are a part of customer requirements.globally.


Available Information

Our website is located at www.microstrategy.com.www.microstrategy.com.  We make available free of charge, on or through the Investor Relations section of our website (http:(http://ir.microstrategy.com)ir.microstrategy.com), our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing such reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).  Information found on our website is not part of this Annual Report or any other report filed with the SEC.  The public may read and copy any materials filed by the Company with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549.  The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.  The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, including us, that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov.


Item 1A.

RiskRisk Factors

You should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision.  The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face.  Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations.

If any of the following risks occurs, our business, financial condition, or results of operations could be materially adversely affected.  In such case, the market price of our class A common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Risks Related to Our Business

Our quarterly operating results, revenues, and expenses may fluctuate significantly, which could have an adverse effect on the market price of our stock

For many reasons, including those described below, our operating results, revenues, and expenses have varied in the past and may vary significantly in the future from quarter to quarter. These fluctuations could have an adverse effect on the market price of our class A common stock.

Fluctuations in Quarterly Operating Results. Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate, in part, as a result of:

the size, timing, volume, and execution of significant orders and shipments;

the size, timing, volume, and execution of significant orders and shipments;

the mix of products and services ordered by customers, including product licenses and subscription offerings, which can affect the extent to which revenue is recognized immediately or over future quarterly periods;

fluctuations in the price of bitcoin, of which we have made significant purchases and in which we expect to continue to make significant purchases, and potential material impairment charges that may be associated therewith;

the timing of the release or delivery of new or enhanced offerings, which may affect the period in which we can recognize revenue;

the mix of our offerings ordered by customers, including product licenses and cloud subscriptions, which can affect the extent to which revenue is recognized immediately or over future quarterly periods;

the timing of announcements of new offerings by us or our competitors;

the timing of the release or delivery of new or enhanced offerings and market acceptance of new and enhanced offerings;

changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors;

the timing of announcements of new offerings by us or our competitors;

market acceptance of new and enhanced versions of our products and services;

changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors;

the length of our sales cycles;

the length of our sales cycles;

seasonal or other buying patterns of our customers;

seasonal or other buying patterns of our customers;

changes in our operating expenses;

changes in our operating expenses;

planned major maintenance activities related to our corporate aircraft;

the impact of the coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic, or other future infectious disease pandemics, on the global economy and on our customers, suppliers, employees, and business;

the timing of research and development projects and the capitalization of software development costs;

the timing of research and development projects;

personnel changes;

utilization of our consulting and education services, which can be affected by delays or deferrals of customer implementation of our software;

our use of channel partners;

fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;

utilization of our consulting and education services, which can be affected by delays or deferrals of customer implementation of our software products;

bilateral or multilateral trade tensions, which could affect our offerings in particular foreign markets;

changes in foreign currency exchange rates;

our profitability and expectations for future profitability and their effect on our deferred tax assets and net income for the period in which any adjustment to our net deferred tax asset valuation allowance may be made;

our profitability and expectations for future profitability and their effect on our deferred tax assets and net income for the period in which any adjustment to our net deferred tax asset valuation allowance may be made;

increases or decreases in our liability for unrecognized tax benefits; and

increases or decreases in our liability for unrecognized tax benefits; and

changes in customer decision making processes or customer budgets.

changes in customer decision-making processes or customer budgets.


Limited Ability to Adjust Expenses. We base our operating expense budgets on expected revenue trends and strategic objectives. Many of our expenses, such as office leases and certain personnel costs, are relatively fixed. We may be unable to adjust spending quickly enough to offset any unexpected revenue shortfall. Accordingly, any shortfall in revenue may cause significant variation in operating results in any quarter. For example, if our revenues in the future are not sufficient to offset our operating expenses, or we are unable to adjust our operating expenses in a timely manner in response to any shortfall in anticipated revenue, we may incur operating losses.

Based on the above factors, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results are not a good indication of our future performance. It is possible that in one or more future quarters, our operating results may be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors. In that event, the market price of our class A common stock may fall.

The market price of our class A common stock has been and may continue to be volatile

The market price of our class A common stock historically has been volatile and may continue to be volatile. The market price of our class A common stock may fluctuate widely in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. These factors include, but are not limited to:

quarterly variations in our results of operations or those of our competitors;

announcements about our earnings that are not in line with analyst expectations, the likelihood of which may be enhanced because it is our policy not to give guidance relating to our anticipated financial performance in future periods;

announcements by us or our competitors of acquisitions, dispositions, new offerings, significant contracts, commercial relationships, or capital commitments;

the emergence of new sales channels in which we are unable to compete effectively;

our ability to develop, market, and deliver new and enhanced offerings on a timely basis;

commencement of, or our involvement in, litigation;

any major change in our Board of Directors, management, or governing documents;

changes in government regulations or in the status of our regulatory approvals;

recommendations by securities analysts or changes in earnings estimates and our ability to meet those estimates;

investor perception of our Company;

announcements by our competitors of their earnings that are not in line with analyst expectations;

the volume of shares of our class A common stock available for public sale;

sales or purchases of stock by us or by our stockholders, and issuances of awards under our stock incentive plan;

short sales, hedging, and other derivative transactions involving shares of our class A common stock; and

general economic conditions and slow or negative growth of related markets.

In addition, the stock market in general, and the market for technology companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of companies in those markets. These broad market and industry factors may seriously harm the market price of our class A common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance.


We may not be able to sustainregain or increase profitability in the future

We generated a net incomeloss for each of the fiscal yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, and 2015; however, we may not be able to sustainregain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future.  If our revenues are not sufficient to offset our operating expenses, or we are unable to adjust our operating expenses in a timely manner in response to any shortfall in anticipated revenue, we may incur operating losses in future periods, our profitability may decrease, or we may cease to be profitable, or we may incur operating losses.profitable.  As a result, our business, results of operations, and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.

As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had $13.4$6.5 million of deferred tax assets, net of a $1.0$1.3 million valuation allowance. If we are unable to sustainregain or increase profitability in the future, we may be required to increase the valuation allowance against these deferred tax assets, which could result in a charge that would materially adversely affect net income in the period in which the charge is incurred.

Economic uncertaintyWe depend on revenue from a single software platform and related services as well as revenue from our installed customer base

Our revenue is derived from sales of our analytics software platform and related services. Although demand for analytics software has continued to grow, the market for analytics offerings continues to evolve.  Resistance from consumer and privacy groups to commercial collection, use, and sharing of personal data has grown in recent years and our customers, potential customers, or the general public may perceive that use of our analytics software could violate individual privacy rights.  In addition, increasing government restrictions on the collection, use, and transfer of personal data could impair the further growth of the market for analytics software, especially in foreign markets. Because we depend on revenue from a single software platform and related services, our business could be harmed by a decline in demand for, or in the adoption or prices of, our platform and related services as a result of, among other factors, any change in our pricing or packaging model, increased competition, maturation in the markets for our platform, or other risks described in this Annual Report. We also depend on our installed customer base for a substantial portion of our revenue. If our existing customers particularlycancel or fail to renew their service contracts or fail to make additional purchases from us, our revenue could decrease and our operating results could be materially adversely affected.

A substantial customer shift in the retail industry,deployment of the MicroStrategy platform from a product license model to a cloud subscription model could affect the timing of revenue recognition, reduce product licenses and product support revenues, and materially adversely affect our operating results

We offer our analytics platform in the form of a product license or a cloud subscription.  The payment streams and revenue recognition timing for our product licenses are different from those for our cloud subscriptions.  For product licenses, customers typically pay us a lump sum soon after entering into a license agreement, and we typically recognize product licenses revenue when control of the license is transferred to the customer.  For cloud subscriptions, customers typically make periodic payments over the subscription period and we recognize subscription services revenues ratably over the subscription period.  As a result, if a substantial number of current customers shift to, or new customers purchase, cloud subscriptions instead of product licenses, the resulting change in payment terms and revenue recognition may result in our recognizing less revenue in the reporting period in which the sale transactions are consummated than has been the case in prior periods, with more revenue being


recognized in future periods.  This change in the timing of revenue recognition could materially adversely affect our businessoperating results and results of operations

The U.S.cash flows for the periods during which such a shift or change in purchasing occurs.  Accordingly, in any particular reporting period, cloud subscription sales could negatively impact product license sales to our existing and other significant markets have experienced cyclical downturns and worldwide economic conditions remain uncertain. Economic uncertainty and associated macroeconomic conditions make it extremely difficult for ourprospective customers, and us to accurately forecast and plan future business activities, and could cause our customers to slow spending on our products and services, which could delayreduce product licenses and lengthen sales cycles.  Furthermore, during uncertain economic times, our customers may face issues gaining timely access to sufficient credit, which could result in an impairment of their ability to make timely payments to us.  If that were to occur, we may be required to increase our allowance for doubtful accounts and our results would be negatively impacted.

Furthermore, we have a significant number of customers in the retail industry, which has recently experienced intense competition and structural changes.  A significant downturn or the intensification of competition in this industry may cause organizations to reduce their capital expenditures in general or specifically reduce their spending on information technology.  In addition, customers in this industry may delay or cancel information technology projects or seek to lower their costs by renegotiating vendor contracts.  Customers with excess information technology resources may choose to develop in-house software solutions rather than obtain those solutions from us.  In recent years, consumers have increasingly migrated toward large e-commerce platforms and other online applications.  As a result, the retail industry has experienced consolidation and other ownership changes.  In the future, retailers may further consolidate, undergo restructurings or reorganizations, or realign their affiliations, any of which could decrease the number of competitors within the retail industry, reducing the number of potential customers for our offerings.  Moreover, our competitors may respond to challenging market conditions by lowering prices and attempting to lure away our customers. 

We cannot predict the timing, strength, or duration of any economic slowdown or any subsequent recovery generally, or competitive and structural changes in the retail industry. If the conditions in the general economy and the markets in which we operate worsen from present levels, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.product support revenues.

We may have exposure to greater than anticipated tax liabilities

We are subject to income taxes and non-income taxes in a variety of domestic and foreign jurisdictions. Our future income taxestax liability could be materially adversely affected by earnings that are lower than anticipated in jurisdictions where we have lower statutory rates, earnings that are higher than anticipated in jurisdictions where we have higher statutory rates, changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, changes in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits, or changes in tax laws, regulations, accounting principles, or interpretations thereof.thereof (including in response to the COVID-19 pandemic).  In addition, if we sold any of our bitcoin at prices greater than the cost basis of the bitcoin sold, we would incur a tax liability with respect to any gain recognized, and such tax liability could be material.

Further changesChanges in the tax laws of foreign jurisdictions could arise, including as a result of the base erosion and profit shifting (“BEPS”) project undertaken by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”) to combat base erosion and profit shifting (“BEPS”). The OECD, which represents a coalition of member countries, has issued recommendations that, in some cases, make substantial changes to numerous long-standing tax positions and principles. These changes, many of which have been adopted or are under active consideration by OECD members and/or other countries, could


increase tax uncertainty and may adversely affect our provision for income taxes.

In addition, in response to significant market volatility and disruptions to business operations resulting from the United States,COVID-19 pandemic, legislatures and taxing authorities in many jurisdictions in which we operate have implemented, and in the future may implement additional, changes to their tax rules.  As part of the U.S. Congress’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCR Act”) and the CARES Act were enacted in March 2020. Both contain numerous tax provisions.  Regulatory guidance under the Tax Act, FFCR Act, and CARES Act is and continues to be forthcoming, and such guidance could ultimately increase or lessen the impact of these laws on our business and financial condition.  It is also likely that the U.S. Congress will enact additional legislation bringing about broadin connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, some of which could have tax provisions that impact us.  In addition, it is uncertain if and to what extent various states will conform to the Tax Act, FFCR Act, or CARES Act.  These changes in the existing corporatelaw could include modifications that have temporary effect or more permanent changes.  The impact of these changes on us, our long-term tax system was recently enacted, with some retroactive effects. For example, during the fourth quarter of 2017, we estimatedplanning, and recorded a one-time transitionour effective tax expense of $40.3 million due to the recently enacted U.S. corporate tax reform legislation that effected a deemed repatriation of certain foreign earnings and profits.rate could be material.

Our determination of our tax liability is subject to review by applicable domestic and foreign tax authorities.  Any adverse outcome of such reviews could have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.  The determination of our worldwide provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities requires significant judgment and, in the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain.  Moreover, as a multinational business, we have subsidiaries that engage in many intercompany transactions in a variety of tax jurisdictions where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain.

We also have contingent tax liabilities that, in management’s judgment, are not probable of assertion.  If such unasserted contingent liabilities were to be asserted, or become probable of assertion, we may be required to record significant expenses and liabilities in the period in which these liabilities are asserted or become probable of assertion.

As a result of these and other factors, the ultimate amount of tax obligations owed may differ from the amounts recorded in our financial statements and any such difference may materially affect our financial results in future periods in which we change our estimates of our tax obligations or in which the ultimate tax outcome is determined.

If the market for analytics products fails to grow as we expect or if businesses fail to adopt our offerings, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be materially adversely affected

Nearly all of our revenues to date have come from sales of analytics products and related technical support, consulting, and education services.  We expect these sales to account for a large portion of our revenues for the foreseeable future.  Although demand for analytics products has grown in recent years, the market for analytics offerings continues to evolve.  Resistance from consumer and privacy groups to increased commercial collection and use of data on spending patterns and other personal behavior, government restrictions on the collection, use, and transfer of personal data, and other developments may impair the further growth of this market.  We cannot be sure that this market will continue to grow or, even if it does grow, that businesses will adopt our solutions.

We have spent, and intend to keep spending, considerable resources to educate potential customers about analytics offerings in general and our offerings in particular.  However, we cannot be sure that these expenditures will help any of our offerings achieve any additional market acceptance.  If the market fails to grow or grows more slowly than we currently expect or businesses fail to adopt our offerings, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

Our products face intense competition, which may lead to lower prices for our products and services, reduced gross margins, loss of market share, and reduced revenue

The analytics market is highly competitive and subject to rapidly changing technology paradigms.  Within the analytics space, we compete with many different types of vendors, including (i) large software vendors, such as IBM (Cognos), SAP (BO), Microsoft (Power BI), and Oracle (OBIEE), that provide one or more products that directly compete with our products, (ii) open source analytics vendors, such as OpenText Analytics and Hitachi (Pentaho), (iii) various other analytics software providers, such as Qlik, Tableau Software, TIBCO, Information Builders, and the SAS Institute, (iv) other vendors offering cloud-based offerings, such as GoodData and Birst, an Infor Company, and (v) companies with EIoT technologies or technologies categorized as user authentication products that are primarily focused on traditional forms of identity verification such as smart cards, tokens, and password managers.  Our future success depends on the effectiveness with which we can differentiate and compete with these vendors and other potential competitors across analytics implementation projects of varying sizes.  Failure to maintain adequate technology differentiation from these competitors could materially adversely affect our revenue from both existing and prospective customers.


Some of our competitors have longer operating histories and significantly greater financial, technical, and marketing resources than we do.  As a result, they may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements or devote greater resources to the development, promotion, sale, and marketing of their offerings than we can, such as offering certain analytics products free of charge when bundled with other software offerings.  In addition, many of our competitors have strong relationships with current and potential customers, extensive industry and specialized business knowledge, as well as corresponding proprietary technologies that they can leverage, such as multidimensional databases and ERP repositories.  As a result, they may be able to prevent us from penetrating new accounts or expanding within existing accounts.

Increased competition may lead to price cuts, reduced gross margins, and loss of market share. We may not be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors, and the failure to meet the competitive pressures we face may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Current and future competitors may also make strategic acquisitions or establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with others.  By doing so, these competitors may increase their ability to meet the needs of our potential customers by their expanded offerings.  Our current or prospective channel partners may establish cooperative relationships with our current or future competitors. These relationships may limit our ability to sell our analytics offerings through specific distribution channels. Accordingly, new competitors or alliances among current and future competitors may emerge and rapidly gain significant market share. These developments could limit our ability to obtain revenues from new customers and to sustain software maintenance revenues from our installed customer base.  In addition, basic office productivity software suites, such as Microsoft Office, could evolve to offer advanced analysis and reporting capabilities that may reduce the demand for our analytics offerings.

We depend on revenue from a single suite of products and related services as well as revenue from our installed customer base

Our MicroStrategy 10 platform and related services account for a substantial portion of our revenue. Because of this revenue concentration, our business could be harmed by a decline in demand for, or in the adoption or prices of, these products and related services as a result of, among other factors, any change in our pricing or packaging model, increased competition, maturation in the markets for these products, or other risks described in this Annual Report.

We also depend on our installed customer base for a substantial portion of our revenue. We have contracts with our license customers for ongoing support and maintenance, as well as contracts for cloud-based subscription services that provide recurring revenues to us. In addition, our installed customer base has historically generated additional new license and services revenues for us. If our existing customers cancel or fail to renew their service contracts or fail to purchase additional products or services, our revenue could decrease and our operating results could be materially adversely affected.

If we are unable to develop and release product enhancements and new offerings to respond to rapid technological change in a timely and cost-effective manner, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be materially adversely affected

The market for our offerings is characterized by rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions and enhancements, changing customer demands, and evolving industry standards.  The introduction of offerings embodying new technologies can quickly make existing offerings obsolete and unmarketable.  We believe that our future success depends largely on our ability to:

continue to support a number of popular operating systems and databases;

maintain and improve our current offerings;

rapidly develop new offerings and product enhancements that achieve market acceptance;

maintain technological competitiveness; and

meet an expanding range of customer requirements.


Analytics applications are inherently complex, and it can take a long time and require significant research and development expenditures to develop and test new offerings and product enhancements.  In addition, customers may delay their purchasing decisions because they anticipate that new or enhanced versions of our offerings will soon become available.  We cannot be sure that we will succeed in developing, marketing, and delivering, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new or enhanced offerings that respond to technological change or new customer requirements, nor can we be sure that any new or enhanced offerings will achieve market acceptance.  Moreover, even if we introduce a new offering, we may experience a decline in revenues of our existing offerings that is not fully matched by the new offering’s revenue.  For example, customers may delay making purchases of a new offering to permit them to make a more thorough evaluation of the offering, or until industry and marketplace reviews become widely available.  Some customers may hesitate migrating to a new offering due to concerns regarding the complexity of migration and product infancy issues on performance.  In addition, we may lose existing customers who choose a competitor’s offering rather than migrate to our new offering. This could result in a temporary or permanent revenue shortfall and materially adversely affect our business.

A substantial customer shift in the deployment of MicroStrategy Analytics from a perpetual software license model to our cloud services model could affect the timing of revenue recognition and materially adversely affect our operating results

We offer our analytics platform in the form of a perpetual software license and a cloud-based subscription.  The payment streams and revenue recognition timing for our perpetual software licenses are different from those for our cloud-based subscriptions.  For perpetual software licenses, customers typically pay us a lump sum soon after entering into a software license agreement and revenue is typically recognized upon delivery of the software to the customer.  For cloud-based subscriptions, customers typically make periodic payments over the subscription period and revenue is typically recognized ratably over the subscription period.  As a result, if a substantial number of current or new customers shift to subscribing to our cloud services offerings instead of purchasing perpetual software licenses for MicroStrategy Analytics, the resulting change in payment terms and revenue recognition may materially adversely affect our operating results and cash flows for the reporting periods during which such a shift occurs.

Our investment in new business strategies and initiatives could disrupt the operations of our ongoing business and present risks that we have not adequately anticipated

We have invested, and in the future may invest, in new business strategies and initiatives.  For example, in recent years we have introduced a number of innovative technologies designed to enable companies to capitalize on Big Data, mobile applications, cloud-based services, security, and Internet of Things trends in the marketplace. These endeavors may involve significant risks and uncertainties, including distraction of management from other business operations, the dedication of significant research and development, sales and marketing, and other resources to these new initiatives at the expense of our other business operations, generation of insufficient revenue to offset expenses associated with new initiatives, incompatibility of our new technologies with third-party platforms, inadequate return of capital, and other risks that we may not have adequately anticipated.  Because new strategies and initiatives are inherently risky, these strategies and initiatives may not be successful and could materially adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

Business disruptions, including interruptions, delays, or failures of our systems, third-party data center hosting facilities or other third-party services, could materially adversely affect our operating results or result in a material weakness in our internal controls that could adversely affect the market price of our stock

A significant portion of our research and development activities or certain other critical business operations are concentrated in facilities in Northern Virginia, China, and Poland.  In addition, we serve our customers, and manage certain critical internal processes, using third-party data center hosting facilities located in the United States and England and other third-party services, including AWS and other cloud services.  We could experience a disruption or failure of our systems, or the third-party hosting facilities or other services that we use. Such disruptions or failures could include a natural disaster, fire, cyber-attack, act of terrorism, geopolitical conflict, or other catastrophic event, as well as power outages or telecommunications infrastructure outages, or a decision by one of our third-party service providers to close facilities that we use without adequate notice or to materially change the


pricing or terms of their services, or other unanticipated problems with the third-party services that we use, including a failure to meet service standards.

We are a highly automated business and any such disruptions or failures could (i) result in the destruction or disruption of any of our critical business operations, controls or procedures, or information technology systems, (ii) severely affect our ability to conduct normal business operations, including delaying completion of sales and provision of services, (iii) result in a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, (iv) cause our customers to terminate their subscriptions, (v) result in our issuing credits to customers or paying penalties or fines, (vi) harm our reputation, (vii) adversely affect our attrition rates or our ability to attract new customers, or (viii) cause our offerings to be perceived as not being secure, any of which could materially adversely affect our future operating results.

We use channel partners and if we are unable to maintain successful relationships with them, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be materially adversely affected

In addition to our direct sales force, we use channel partners, such as resellers, value-added resellers, system integrators, consulting firms, resellers, solution providers, managed service providers, OEMs, and technology partnerscompanies, to license and support our products.offerings.  For the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, transactions by channel partners for which we recognized revenuesrevenue accounted for 21.7%23.3% of our total product licenses revenues.  Our channel partners may offer customers the productsrevenues, and services of several different companies, including offerings that compete with ours.  Because our channel partners generally do not have exclusive relationships with us, we cannot be certain that they will prioritize or devote adequate resources to selling our products.  Moreover, divergence in strategy or contract defaults by any of these channel partners may materially adversely affect our ability to develop, market, sell, or support our offerings.

Although we believe that direct sales will continue to account for a majority of our product licenses revenues, we seek to maintain a significant level of sales activities through our channel partners.  There can be no assurance that our channel partners will continue to cooperate with us.  In addition, actions taken or not taken by such parties may materially adversely affect us. Our ability to achieve revenue growth in the future will depend in part on our ability to maintain successful relationships withthese relationships.  Our channel partners may offer customers the products and services of several different companies, including competing offerings, and we cannot be certain that they will prioritize or devote adequate resources to selling our channel partners.offerings.  If we are unable to maintain our relationships with theseour channel partners, or if we experience a reduction in sales by our channel partners, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

In addition, we rely on our channel partners to operate in accordance with applicable laws and regulatory requirements. If they fail to do so, we may need to incur significant costs in responding to investigations or enforcement actions or paying penalties assessed by the applicable authorities.  We also rely on our channel partners to operate in accordance with the terms of their contractual agreements with us.  For example, some of our agreements with our channel partners prescribe the terms and conditions pursuant to which they are authorized to resell or distribute our software and offer technical support and related services.  If our channel partners do not comply with their contractual obligations to us, our business, operating results, and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.

Our recognition of deferred revenue and advance payments is subject to future performance obligations and may not be representative of revenues for succeeding periods

Our gross current and non-current deferred revenue and advance payments totaled $218.7$205.9 million as of December 31, 2017.  We offset our accounts receivable and deferred revenue for any unpaid items, which totaled $95.9 million, resulting in net current and non-current deferred revenue and advance payments of $122.8 million as of December 31, 2017.2020.  The timing and ultimate recognition of our deferred revenue and advance payments depend on various factors, including our performance of various service obligations.

Because of the possibility of customer changes or delays in customer development or implementation schedules or budgets, and the need for us to satisfactorily perform product support and other services, deferred revenue and advance payments at any particular date may not be representative of actual revenue for any succeeding period.

We may lose sales, or sales may be delayed, due to the long sales and implementation cycles of certain of our offerings, which could materially adversely affect our revenues and operating results

The decision to purchase our offerings typically requires our customers to invest substantial time, money, personnel, and other resources, which can result in long sales cycles that can exceed nine months. These long sales cycles increase the risk that intervening events, such as the introduction of new offerings and changes in customer budgets and purchasing priorities, will affect the size, timing, and completion of an order. Even if an order is completed, the time and resources required to implement and integrate our offerings vary widely depending on customer needs and the complexity of deployment. If we lose sales or sales are delayed due to these long sales and implementation cycles, our revenues and operating results for that period may be materially adversely affected.

Our results in any particular period may depend on the number and volume of large transactions in that period and these transactions may involve lengthier, more complex, and more unpredictable sales cycles than other transactions

Larger, enterprise-level transactions often require considerably more resources, are often more complex to implement, and typically require additional management approval, which may result in a lengthier, more complex, and less predictable sales cycle and may increase the risk that an order is delayed or not brought to completion. We may also encounter greater competition and pricing pressure on these larger transactions, and our sales and delivery efforts may be more costly. The presence or absence of one or more large transactions in a particular period may have a material effect on our revenues and operating results for that period and may result in lower estimated revenues and earnings in future periods. For the year ended December 31, 2020, our top three product licenses


transactions with recognized revenue totaled $15.3 million, or 17.6% of total product licenses revenues, compared to $5.4 million, or 6.2% of total product licenses revenues, for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Our offerings face intense competition, which may lead to lower prices for our offerings, reduced gross margins, loss of market share, and reduced revenue

The analytics market is highly competitive and subject to rapidly changing technology. Within the analytics space, we compete with many different software vendors, including IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, Qlik, Salesforce, and SAP.  Our future success depends on our ability to differentiate our offerings and successfully compete across analytics implementation projects of varying sizes.  Our ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, both within and outside of our control.  Some of these factors include software deployment options; analytical, mobility, data discovery, and visualization capabilities; performance and scalability; the quality and reliability of our customer service and support; and brand recognition.  Failure to compete successfully in any one of these or other areas may reduce the demand for our offerings and materially adversely affect our revenue from both existing and prospective customers.

Some of our competitors have longer operating histories and significantly greater financial, technical, and marketing resources than we do.  As a result, they may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements or devote greater resources to the development, promotion, sale, and marketing of their offerings than we can, such as offering certain analytics products free of charge when bundled with other products.  In addition, many of our competitors have strong relationships with current and potential customers, extensive industry and specialized business knowledge, and corresponding proprietary technologies that they can leverage. As a result, they may be able to prevent us from penetrating new accounts or expanding existing accounts.

Increased competition may lead to price cuts, reduced gross margins, and loss of market share. The failure to compete successfully and meet the competitive pressures we face may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Current and future competitors may also make strategic acquisitions or establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with others.  By doing so, these competitors may increase their ability to meet the needs of our potential customers by their expanded offerings and rapidly gain significant market share, which could limit our ability to obtain revenues from new customers and to sustain software maintenance revenues from our installed customer base.  In addition, basic office productivity software suites, such as Microsoft Office, could evolve to offer advanced analysis and reporting capabilities that may reduce the demand for our analytics offerings.

Risks Related to Our Technology and Intellectual Property

If we are unable to develop and release new offerings and software enhancements to respond to rapid technological change, new customer requirements, or evolving industry standards in a timely and cost-effective manner, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be materially adversely affected

The market for our offerings is characterized by frequent new offerings and software enhancements in response to rapid technological change, new customer requirements, and evolving industry standards.  The introduction of new or enhanced offerings can quickly make existing ones obsolete.  We believe our future success depends largely on our ability to continue to support popular operating systems and databases, maintain and improve our current offerings, rapidly develop new offerings and software enhancements that achieve market acceptance, maintain technological competitiveness, and meet an expanding range of customer requirements.

Analytics applications are inherently complex, and research and development can be costly and time consuming. In addition, customers may delay their purchasing decisions because they anticipate that new or enhanced versions of our offerings will soon become available or because of concerns regarding the complexity of migration or performance issues related to new offerings.  We cannot be sure that we will succeed in developing, marketing, and delivering, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new or enhanced offerings that will achieve market acceptance.  Moreover, even if our new offerings achieve market acceptance, we may experience a decline in revenues of our


existing offerings that is not fully matched by the new offering’s revenue. This could result in a temporary or permanent revenue shortfall and materially adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.

We depend on technology licensed to us by third parties, and changes in or the discontinuances of such licenses could impair our software, delay implementation of our offerings, or force us to pay higher license fees

We license third-party technologies that are incorporated into or utilized by our existing offerings. These licenses may be terminated, or we may be unable to license third-party technologies for future offerings. In addition, we may be unable to renegotiate acceptable third-party license terms, or we may be subject to infringement liability if third-party technologies that we license is found to infringe intellectual property rights of others. Changes in or the discontinuance of third-party licenses could lead to a material increase in our costs or to our offerings becoming inoperable or their performance being materially reduced.  As a result, we may need to incur additional development costs to help ensure continued performance of our offerings, and we may experience a decreased demand for our offerings.

Changes in third-party software or systems or the emergence of new industry standards could materially adversely affect the operation of and demand for our existing software

The functionalities of our software depend in part on the ability of our software to interface with our customers’ information technology (“IT”) infrastructure and cloud environments, including software applications, network infrastructure, and end user devices, which are supplied to our customers by various other vendors. When new or updated versions of these third-party software or systems are introduced, or new industry standards in related fields emerge, we may be required to develop updated versions of or enhancements to our software to help ensure that it continues to effectively interoperate with our customers’ IT infrastructure and cloud environments. If new or modified operating systems are introduced or new web standards and technologies or new standards in the field of database access technology emerge that are incompatible with our software, development efforts to maintain the interoperability of our software with our customers’ IT infrastructure and cloud environments could require substantial capital investment and employee resources. If we are unable to update our software in a timely manner, cost-effectively, or at all, the ability of our software to perform key functions could be impaired, which may impact our customers’ satisfaction with our software, potentially result in breach of warranty or other claims, and materially adversely affect demand for our software.

The nature of our software makes it particularly susceptible to undetected errors, bugs, or security vulnerabilities, which could cause problems with how the software performs and, in turn, reduce demand for our software, reduce our revenue, and lead to litigation claims against us

Despite extensive testing by us and our current and potential customers, we have in the past discovered software errors, bugs, or security vulnerabilities in our offerings after commercial shipments began and they may be found in future offerings or releases. This could result in lost revenue, damage to our reputation, or delays in market acceptance, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.  We may also need to expend resources and capital to correct these defects if they occur.

Our customer agreements typically contain provisions designed to limit our exposure to product liability, warranty, and other claims.  It is possible these provisions are unenforceable in certain domestic or international jurisdictions, and we may be exposed to such claims. A successful claim against us could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Our intellectual property is valuable, and any inability to protect it could reduce the value of our offerings and brand

Unauthorized third parties may try to copy or reverse engineer portions of our software or otherwise obtain and use our intellectual property. Copyrights, patents, trademarks, trade secrets, confidentiality procedures, and contractual commitments can only provide limited protection. Any intellectual property owned by us may be invalidated, circumvented, or challenged. Any of our pending or future intellectual property applications, whether or not currently being challenged, may not be issued with the scope we seek, if at all. Moreover, amendments to and


developing jurisprudence regarding U.S. and international law may affect our ability to protect our intellectual property and defend against claims of infringement. In addition, although we generally enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees and contractors, the confidential nature of our intellectual property may not be maintained. Furthermore, the laws of some countries do not provide the same level of protection of our intellectual property as do the laws of the United States. If we cannot protect our intellectual property against unauthorized copying or use, we may not remain competitive.

Third parties may claim we infringe their intellectual property rights

We periodically receive notices from third parties claiming we are infringing their intellectual property rights. The number of such claims may increase as we expand our offerings and branding, the number of offerings and level of competition in our industry grow, the functionality of offerings overlaps, and the volume of issued patents, patent applications, and copyright and trademark registrations continues to increase. Responding to any infringement claim, regardless of its validity, could:

be time-consuming, costly, and/or result in litigation;

divert management’s time and attention from developing our business;

require us to pay monetary damages or enter into royalty or licensing agreements that we would normally find unacceptable;

require us to stop selling certain of our offerings;

require us to redesign certain of our offerings using alternative non-infringing technology or practices, which could require significant effort and expense;

require us to rename certain of our offerings or entities; or

require us to satisfy indemnification obligations to our customers or channel partners.

Additionally, while we monitor our use of third-party software, including open source software, our processes for controlling such use in our offerings may not be effective.  If we fail to comply with the terms or conditions associated with third-party software that we use, if we inadvertently embed certain types of third-party software into one or more of our offerings, or if third-party software that we license is found to infringe the intellectual property rights of others, we could subject ourselves to infringement liability and be required to re-engineer our offerings, discontinue the sale of our offerings, or make available to certain third parties or generally available, in source code form, our proprietary code, any of which could materially adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.

If a successful infringement claim is made against us and we fail to develop or license a substitute technology or brand name, as applicable, our business, results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

Risks Related to Our Operations

We face risks related to the COVID-19 pandemic that could significantly disrupt or materially adversely affect our business and operating results.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant adverse impact on global commercial activity and has created significant volatility in financial markets. Many governmental authorities have instituted quarantines, work-from-home directives, shelter-in-place orders, social distancing mandates, travel restrictions, border closures, limitations on public gatherings, and closures of or operational limitations on non-essential businesses, which are adversely impacting a number of industries such as travel, leisure, hospitality, and retail. There is significant uncertainty around the breadth and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19, as well as its impact on the global economy and consumer confidence. The COVID-19 pandemic could have a sustained adverse impact on economic and market conditions and trigger a period of prolonged global economic slowdown, which could decrease technology spending, adversely affect demand for our offerings, and harm our business and operating results.


Our product licenses revenues may be negatively impacted in future periods until the effects of the pandemic have subsided due to a general increase in the time it takes to close deals in the current depressed macroeconomic environment.  Our product support revenues may also be negatively impacted in future periods by the overall depressed macroeconomic environment and to the extent that customers require extended payment terms or determine not to renew their product support arrangements as part of their efforts to reduce expenses.  Similarly, we may experience declines in our consulting revenues in future periods due to the overall depressed macroeconomic environment and as our customers continue to operate in remote work environments and aim to reduce expenses. The uncertainty related to COVID-19 may also result in increased volatility in the financial projections we use as the basis for estimates and assumptions used in our financial statements.

In light of the uncertain and rapidly evolving situation relating to COVID-19, we have taken precautionary measures intended to reduce the risk of the virus to our employees, customers, and communities in which we operate. We have established remote working arrangements for our employees, placed restrictions on non-essential business travel, and cancelled or shifted our customer, employee, and industry events to a virtual-only format for the foreseeable future. As a result of these precautionary measures, there could be a negative impact on our sales, marketing, and customer success efforts, continued delays in our sales cycles, delays in the release or delivery of new or enhanced offerings or unexpected changes to such offerings, or operational or other challenges, any of which could significantly disrupt our business and operating results. For example, our shift to creating virtual customer and industry events may not be successful, and we may not be able to showcase our products as effectively or generate the same customer interest, opportunities, and leads through virtual events as we have historically done through in-person events. Additionally, while we have not experienced any material disruptions to date, our technological systems or infrastructure may not be equipped to facilitate effective remote working arrangements or operate in compliance with all laws and regulations for our employees in the short or long term.

Considerable uncertainty still surrounds COVID-19 and its potential long-term economic effects and the effectiveness of any responses taken by government authorities and businesses. Although we continue to actively monitor the situation and may take further actions as may be required by government authorities or as more information and public health guidance become available, the full extent to which COVID-19 impacts our business and operating results will depend on future developments, including the duration, spread, severity, and potential recurrence of the COVID-19 pandemic, impact on our customers and our sales cycles, our ability to generate new business leads, impact on our customer, employee, and industry events, and effect on our vendors, all of which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted.

In addition, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic may heighten many of the other risks described in this “Risk Factors” section.

Business disruptions, including interruptions, delays, or failures of our systems, third-party data center hosting facility, or other third-party services, could materially adversely affect our operating results or result in a material weakness in our internal controls that could adversely affect the market price of our stock

A significant portion of our research and development activities or certain other critical business operations are concentrated in facilities in Northern Virginia, China, and Poland.  In addition, we serve our customers and manage certain critical internal processes using a third-party data center hosting facility located in the United States and other third-party services, including AWS, Azure, and other cloud services. Any disruptions or failures of our systems or the third-party hosting facility or other services that we use, including as a result of a natural disaster, fire, cyberattack, act of terrorism, geopolitical conflict, pandemic (including the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic), the effects of climate change, or other catastrophic event, as well as power outages, telecommunications infrastructure outages, a decision by one of our third-party service providers to close facilities that we use without adequate notice or to materially change the pricing or terms of their services, host country restrictions on the conduct of our business operations or the availability of our offerings, or other unanticipated problems with the third-party services that we use, such as a failure to meet service standards, could severely impact our ability to conduct our business operations or to attract new customers or maintain existing customers, or result in a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, any of which could materially adversely affect our future operating results.


Our international operations are complex and expose us to risks that could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition


We receive a significant portion of our total revenues from international sales and conduct our business activities in various foreign countries, including some emerging markets where we have limited experience, where the challenges of conducting our business can be significantly different from those we have faced in more developed markets, and where business practices may create internal control risks. International revenues accounted for 41.9%, 39.3%43.7%, and 38.3%42.3% of our total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015,2018, respectively. Our international operations require significant management attention and financial resources.

There are certainresources and expose us to additional risks, inherent in our international business activities, including:

fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;

fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;

new, or changes in, regulatory requirements;

new, or changes in, regulatory requirements;

tariffs, export and import restrictions, restrictions on foreign investments, sanctions, and other trade barriers or protection measures;

tariffs, export and import restrictions, restrictions on foreign investments, tax laws, sanctions, laws and policies that favor local competitors (such as mandatory technology transfers), and other trade barriers or protection measures;

costs of localizing offerings;

compliance with a wide variety of laws, including those relating to labor matters, antitrust, procurement and contracting, consumer and data protection, privacy, data localization, governmental access to data, network security, and encryption;

lack of acceptance of localized offerings;

costs of localizing offerings and lack of acceptance of localized offerings;

difficulties in and costs of staffing, managing, and operating our international operations;

difficulties in and costs of staffing, managing, and operating our international operations;

tax issues, including restrictions on repatriating earnings;

economic weakness or currency-related crises;

weaker intellectual property protection;

generally longer payment cycles and greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable;

economic weakness or currency related crises;

weaker intellectual property protection;

the burden of complying with a wide variety of laws, including those relating to labor matters, consumer and data protection, privacy, network security, and encryption;

increased risk of corporate espionage or misappropriation, theft, or misuse of intellectual property, particularly in foreign countries where we have significant software development operations that have access to product source code, such as China;

generally longer payment cycles and greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable;

our ability to adapt to sales practices and customer requirements in different cultures;

our ability to adapt to sales practices and customer requirements in different cultures;

natural disasters, acts of war, terrorism, or pandemics (including the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic); and

corporate espionage; and

political instability and security risks in the countries where we are doing business.

political instability and security risks in the countries where we are doing business.

We may face heightened risks in connection with our international operations as a result of the impending withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union, commonly referred to as “Brexit.”  The future effects of Brexit are uncertain and will depend on any agreements the United Kingdom makes to retain access to E.U. markets either during a transitional period or more permanently.  Brexit could, among other outcomes, disrupt the free movement of goods, services and people between the United Kingdom and the European Union, and significantly disrupt trade between the United Kingdom and the European Union. In addition, Brexit could lead to legal uncertainty and potentially divergent national laws and regulations, including tax laws and regulations, as the United Kingdom determines which E.U. laws to replace or replicate. Disruptions to trade, weakening of economic conditions, economic and legal uncertainties, or changes in currency rates may adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results, and cash flows.

On December 22, 2017,For example, we may face heightened risks in connection with our international operations as a result of the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislationwithdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union, commonly referred to as “Brexit.”  The future effects of Brexit are uncertain and will depend on the implementation of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the United Kingdom and the European Union and any other agreements the United Kingdom may make in the future to retain access to European Union markets post their separation.  Brexit could, among other outcomes, disrupt the free movement of goods, services, and people between the United Kingdom and the European Union. Brexit could also lead to legal uncertainty and potentially divergent national laws and regulations as the United Kingdom determines which EU laws to replace or replicate.  In addition, the Trump administration has called for substantial changes to U.S. foreign trade policy, including the imposition of greater restrictions on international trade and significant increases in tariffs on goods imported into the United States, and has increased tariffs on certain goods imported into the United States from a number of foreign markets, following which retaliatory tariffs have been imposed on exports of certain U.S. goods to those markets.  These tariffs and any further escalation of protectionist trade measures could adversely affect the markets in which we sell our offerings and, in turn, our business, financial condition, operating results, and cash flows and it is unclear to what extent the Biden administration would undertake any of the changes proposed by the prior administration.


Changes to the U.S. taxation of our international income, or changes in foreign tax laws, could have a material effect on our future operating results. For example, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”), with some retroactive effects. This legislation brings about, among other items,led to corporate income tax rate changes, the modification or elimination of certain tax incentives, changes to the existing regime for taxing overseas earnings, (including modifications to the current regime for repatriating such earnings), and measures to prevent BEPS.  Although the overall impact that the legislation may have on our future effective tax rate is unclear at this time, the changes to the U.S. taxation of our international income could have a material effect on our future operating results.


From time to time, we may undertake various potential intercompany transactions and legal entity restructurings that involve our international subsidiaries. We consider various factors in evaluating these potential transactions and restructurings, including the alignment of our corporate structure with our organizational objectives, the operational and tax efficiency of our corporate structure,BEPS, and the long-term cash flows and cash needsUnited Kingdom adopted legislation imposing a tax related to offshore receipts in respect of our business. Such transactions and restructurings could negatively impact our overallintangible property held in low tax rate and result in additional tax liabilities.jurisdictions.

In addition,Moreover, compliance with foreign and U.S. laws and regulations that are applicable to our international operations is complex and may increase our cost of doing business in international jurisdictions,jurisdictions. Our failure to comply with these laws and our international operations couldregulations has exposed, and may in the future expose, us to fines and penalties if we fail to comply with these regulations.penalties. These laws and regulations include anti-bribery laws, such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act, and local laws prohibiting corrupt payments to government officials.officials, and local laws relating to procurement, contracting, and antitrust. These laws and regulations also include import and export requirements and economic and trade sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control and the U.S. Department of Commerce Department based on U.S. foreign policy and national security goals against targeted foreign states, organizations, and individuals.  Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to help ensure compliance with these laws, there can be no assurance that our employees, channel partners, and other persons with whom we do business will notmay take actions in violation of our policies or these laws. For example, following an internal review initiated in 2018, we believe our Brazilian subsidiary failed or likely failed to comply with local procurement regulations in conducting business with certain Brazilian government entities. Any violationsviolation of these laws could subject us to civil or criminal penalties, including substantial fines or prohibitions on our ability to offersell our products and servicesofferings to one or more countries, and could also materially damage our reputation and our brand.

These factors may have a material adverse effect on our future sales, and, consequently, on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

We may lose sales, or sales may be delayed, due to the long sales and implementation cycles of certain of our products and services, which could reduce our revenues

To date, our customers have typically invested substantial time, money, and other resources, and involved many people in the decision to license our software products and purchase our related services.  As a result, we may wait nine months or more after the first contact with a customer for that customer to place an order while it seeks internal approval for the purchase of our products or services.  During this long sales cycle, events may occur that affect the size and/or timing of the order or even cause it to be canceled.  For example, our competitors may introduce new offerings, or the customer’s own budget and purchasing priorities may change.

Even after an order is placed, the time it takes to deploy our products and complete services engagements can vary widely.  Implementing some of our offerings can take several months, depending on the customer’s needs, and may begin only with a pilot program.  It may be difficult to deploy our products if the customer has complicated deployment requirements, which typically involve integrating databases, hardware, and software from different vendors.  If a customer hires a third party to deploy our products, we cannot be sure that our products will be deployed successfully.

Our results in any particular period may depend on the number and volume of large transactions in that period and these transactions may involve lengthier, more complex, and more unpredictable sales cycles than other transactions

As existing and potential customers seek to standardize on a single analytics vendor or require greater vendor capacity to meet their growing analytics needs, our business may experience larger transactions at the enterprise level and larger transactions may account for a greater proportion of our business. The presence or absence of one or more large transactions in a particular period may have a material positive or negative effect on our revenue and operating results for that period.  For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, our top three product licenses transactions with recognized revenue totaled $4.5 million, $9.2 million, and $7.4 million, respectively, or 4.8%, 8.1%, and 6.2% of total product licenses revenues, respectively.  These transactions represent significant business and financial decisions for our customers, require considerable effort on the part of customers to assess alternative products, and often require additional levels of management approval.  In addition, large transactions are often more complex than smaller transactions.  These factors generally lengthen the typical sales cycle and increase the risk that customers may postpone or delay purchasing decisions from one period to another subsequent or later period, or that customers will alter their purchasing requirements.  We may also encounter greater competition and pricing pressure in larger transactions, and the sales effort and service delivery scope for larger transactions may


require us to use additional resources to execute the transaction.  These factors could result in lower than anticipated revenue and earnings for a particular period or in lower estimated revenue and earnings in future periods.

We face a variety of risks in doing business with U.S., and foreign federal, state, and local governments and government agencies, including risks related to the procurement process, budget constraints and cycles, termination of contracts, and compliance with government contracting requirements

Our customers include the U.S. government and a number of state and local governments and government agencies.  There are a variety of risks in doing business with government entities, including:

Procurement.  Contracting with public sector customers is highly competitive and can be time-consuming and expensive, requiring us to incur significant up-front time and expense without any assurance that we will win a contract.

Budgetary Constraints and Cycles.  Demand and payment for our products and services are impacted by publicPublic sector budgetary cycles and funding availability, with funding reductions or delays adversely impacting public sectorimpact demand and payment for our products and services.offerings.

Termination of Contracts.  Public sector customers often have contractual or other legal rights to terminate current contracts for convenience or due to a default. If a contract is terminated for convenience, which can occur if the customer’s needs change, we may only be able to collect fees for productssoftware or services delivered prior to termination and settlement expenses.  If a contract is terminated due to a default, we may not recover even those amounts, and we may be liable for excess costs incurred by the customer for procuring alternative productssoftware or services.

Compliance with Government Contracting Requirements.  Government contractors are required to comply with a variety of complex laws, regulations, and contractual provisions relating to the formation, administration, or performance of government contracts that give public sector customers substantial rights and remedies, many of which are not typically found intypical for commercial contracts.  These may include rights with respect toregarding price protection, the accuracy of information provided to the government, contractor compliance with socio-economic policies, and other terms that are particularunique to government contracts.  Federal, state, and local governmentsGovernments and government agencies routinely investigate and audit contractors for compliance with these requirements. If, as a result of an audit or review, it is determined that we have failed to comply with these requirements, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties andor administrative sanctions, including contract termination, of contracts, forfeiture of profits, cost associated with the triggering of price reduction clauses, fines, and suspensions or debarment from future government business and we may suffer harm to our reputation.


Our customers also include a number of foreign governments and government agencies.  Similar procurement, budgetary, contract, and audit risks also apply to our doing business with these entities.  In addition, compliance with complex regulations and contracting provisions in a variety of jurisdictions can be expensive and consume significant management resources.  In certain jurisdictions, our ability to win business may be constrained by political and other factors unrelated to our competitive position in the market.  Each of these difficulties could materially adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We depend on technology licensed to us by third parties, and the loss of this technology could impair our software, delay implementation of our offerings, or force us to pay higher license fees

We license third-party technologies that are incorporated into or utilized by our existing offerings. There can be no assurance that the licenses for such third-party technologies will not be terminated or that we will be able to license third-party software for future offerings. In addition, we may be unable to renegotiate acceptable third-party license terms, or we may be subject to infringement liability if third-party software that we license is found to infringe intellectual property rights of others. Changes in or the loss of third-party licenses could lead to a material increase in our costs, or to our software offerings becoming inoperable or their performance being materially reduced.  As a result, we may need to incur additional development costs to help ensure continued performance of our offerings, and we may experience a decreased demand for our offerings.


If we are unable to recruit or retain skilled personnel, or if we lose the services of our Chairman of the Board of Directors President & Chief Executive Officer, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be materially adversely affected

Our future success depends on our continuing ability to attract, train, assimilate, and retain highly skilled personnel.  Competition for thesequalified employees is intense,in the technology industry has historically been high, and competition may be further amplified by evolving restrictions on immigration, travel, or availability of visas for skilled technology workers.workers, including restrictions imposed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We may not be able to retain our current key employees or attract, train, assimilate, and retain other highly skilled personnel in the future. Our future success also depends in large part on the continued service of Michael J. Saylor, our Chairman of the Board of Directors President & Chief Executive Officer.  If we lose the services of Mr. Saylor, or if we are unable to attract, train, assimilate, and retain the highly skilled personnel we need, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

The emergence of new industry standards may materially adversely affect the demand for our existing offerings

The emergence of new industry standards in related fields may materially adversely affect the demand for our existing offerings.  This could happen if new web standards and technologies or new standards in the field of operating system support emerge that are incompatible with customer deployments of our software offerings.  For example, if we are unable to adapt our software offerings on a timely basis to new standards in database access technology, the ability of our software offerings to access customer databases could be impaired.

The nature of our software offerings makes them particularly susceptible to undetected errors, bugs, or security vulnerabilities, which could cause problems with how the offerings perform and which could, in turn, reduce demand for our offerings, reduce our revenue, and lead to product liability claims against us

Software as complex as ours may contain undetected errors, bugs, or security vulnerabilities.  Although we test our software offerings extensively, we have in the past discovered software errors, bugs, or security vulnerabilities in our offerings after their introduction.  Despite testing by us and our current and potential customers, errors, bugs, or security vulnerabilities may be found in new offerings or releases after commercial shipments begin.  This could result in lost revenue, damage to our reputation, or delays in market acceptance, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.  We may also need to expend resources and capital to correct these defects.

Our agreements with customers typically contain provisions designed to limit our exposure to product liability, warranty, and other claims.  It is possible, however, that these provisions may not be effective under the laws of certain domestic or international jurisdictions and we may be exposed to product liability, warranty, and other claims.  A successful product liability claim against us could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Changes in laws or regulations relating to privacy or the collection, processing, disclosure, storage, localization, or transmission of personal data, or any actual or perceived failure by us or our third-party service providers to comply with such laws and regulations, contractual obligations, or applicable privacy policies, could materially adversely affect our business

Aspects of our business including our cloud services offerings and Usher, involve collecting, processing, disclosing, storing, and transmitting personal data, which are subject to certain privacy policies, contractual obligations, and certain federal, state,U.S. and foreign laws, regulations, and directives relating to privacy and data protection. TheWe store a substantial amount of customer and employee data, that we store throughincluding personal data, on our cloud services offerings, networks and other systems including personal data, is increasing.and the cloud environments we manage. In addition, the types of data subject to protection as personal data in the European Union, the United States, and elsewhere have been expanding. In recent years, the collection and use of personal data by companies have come under increased regulatory and public scrutiny, especially in relation to the collection and processing of sensitive data, such as healthcare, biometric, genetic, financial services, and government data.children’s data, precise location data, and data regarding a person’s race or ethnic origins, political opinions, or religious beliefs. For example, in the United States, protected health information is subject to HIPAA.  HIPAA has been supplemented by the Health Information TechnologyInsurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), which can provide for Economic and Clinical Health Act with the result of increased civil and criminal penalties for noncompliance. Entities performing certain functions(such as us) that engage in creating, receiving, maintaining, or


transmitting protected health information provided by covered entities and other business associates are directly subject to enforcement under HIPAA.  Our access to protected health information through our cloud services offerings triggers obligations to comply with certain privacy rules and data security requirements under HIPAA.  

Any systems failure or security breach that results in the release of, or unauthorized access to, personal data, or any failure or perceived failure by us or our third-party service providers to comply with applicable privacy policies, contractual obligations, or any applicable laws or regulations relating to privacy or data protection, could result in proceedings against us by domestic or foreign government entities or others, including private plaintiffs in litigation.  Such proceedings could result in the imposition of sanctions, fines, penalties, liabilities, government orders, and/or government orders requiring that we change our data practices, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, reputation, and financial condition.

Various federal, state,U.S. and foreign legislative, regulatory, or other government bodies may enact new or additional laws or regulations, or issue rulings that invalidate prior laws or regulations, concerning privacy, data storage, data protection, and cross-border transfer of data that could materially adversely impact our business. For example,In the European Union, the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) took effect in October 2015,May 2018.  GDPR establishes requirements regarding the handling and security of personal data, requires disclosure of data breaches to individuals, customers, and data protection authorities in certain circumstances, requires companies to honor data subjects’ requests relating to their personal data, permits regulators to impose fines of up to €20,000,000 or 4% of global annual revenue, whichever is higher, and establishes


a private right of action.  Furthermore, a new ePrivacy Regulation, regulating electronic communications, was proposed in 2017 and is under consideration by the European Commission, the European Parliament, and the European Council. More recently, the Court of Justice of the European Union issued a ruling that declared(“CJEU”) invalidated the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Framework invalid.  Following this ruling, U.S. and European authorities agreed to, andPrivacy Shield in July 2016 the European Commission formally adopted,2020.  The U.S.-EU Privacy Shield provided a new mechanism forto lawfully transferringtransfer personal data from the European Union to the United States referredand certain other countries.  In the wake of the invalidation of the U.S.-EU Privacy Shield, we have transitioned to asreliance on the “Privacy Shield.”  In addition, in April 2016, the European Parliament and the Council ofEU Standard Contractual Clauses (“SCCs”) to lawfully transfer certain personal data from the European Union formallyto the United States. The rules involving this alternative data transfer option are also undergoing revision and this transfer mechanism may also be declared invalid (or require us to change our business practices) in the future, requiring us to provide an alternative means of data transfer.

Brazil also enacted the Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados (the Brazilian General Data Protection Law), which became effective in August 2020 and imposes requirements largely similar to GDPR on products and services offered to users in Brazil.  In China, we may also be subject to the Cybersecurity Law that went into effect in June 2017 and the revision of the Personal Information Security Specification that went into effect in October 2020, which have broad but uncertain application and impose a number of new privacy and data security obligations. China is also considering the implementation of new legislation on the protection of privacy and personal data, including a Personal Information Protection Law and a Data Security Law that may impose new obligations on us. Other countries are considering new or expanded laws governing privacy and data security that may impact our business practices.

The state of California has also adopted a new comprehensive generalprivacy law, the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), which took effect in January 2020 and became enforceable in July 2020.  We may be required to devote substantial resources to implement and maintain compliance with the CCPA, and noncompliance could result in regulatory investigations and fines or private litigation. Moreover, in November 2020, California voters approved a new privacy law, the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”), which amends the CCPA to create new privacy rights and obligations in California. Several other states are also considering bills similar to the CCPA or other generally applicable privacy laws that may impose additional costs and obligations on us.

Furthermore, the U.S. Congress is considering comprehensive privacy legislation. At this time, it is unclear whether Congress will pass such a law and if so, when and what it will require and prohibit.  Moreover, it is not clear whether any such legislation would give the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) any new authority to impose civil penalties for violations of the Federal Trade Commission Act in the first instance, whether Congress will grant the FTC rulemaking authority over privacy and information security, or whether Congress will vest some or all privacy and data security regulatory authority and enforcement power in a new agency, akin to EU data protection regulation, which will take effect in May 2018.  The new law governs data practices and privacy, and establishes new requirements regarding the handling of personal data.  Furthermore, a new ePrivacy regulation, regulating electronic communications, is also slated to take effect in the European Union in 2018.  authorities.

Complying with these and other changing requirements could cause us or our customers to incur substantial costs or pay substantial fines or penalties, require us to change our business practices, require us to take on more onerous obligations in our contracts, or limit our ability to provide certain products and servicesofferings in certain jurisdictions, any of which could materially adversely affect our business and operating results.  In addition, the Privacy Shield, as well as other mechanisms for lawfully transferring personal data from the European Union to the United States and certain other countries, are being challenged in European courts, which could lead to uncertainty about the legality of such transfers, or burdensome or inconsistent legal requirements.  The Privacy Shield is also subject to annual review by the European Commission and the U.S. Department of Commerce, which could result in modifications to the Privacy Shield or its enforcement, or even its invalidation.  In addition, we may be subject to a cybersecurity law that went into effect in China on June 1, 2017 that has uncertain but broad application and imposes a number of new privacy and data security obligations.  New laws or regulations restricting or limiting the collection or use of mobile data could also reduce demand for certain of our servicesofferings or require changes to our business practices, which could materially adversely affect our business and operating results.

If we or our third-party service providers experience a disruption due to a cybersecurity attack or security breach and unauthorized parties obtain access to our customers’, prospects’, vendors’, or channel partners’ data, our data, or our cloud services offerings, networks or other systems, or the cloud environments we manage, our offerings may be perceived as not being secure, our reputation may be harmed, demand for our offerings may be reduced, our operations may be disrupted, we may incur significant legal and financial liabilities, and our business could be materially adversely affected

As part of our business, we process, store, and transmit our customers’, prospects’, vendors’, and channel partners’ information and data as well as our own, including in our cloud services offerings, networks and other systems.  There can be no assurance that any security measures thatsystems and the cloud environments we or our third-party service providers have implemented will be effective against all current or future security threats.  For example, security measuresmanage. Security breaches may be breached as a result ofoccur due to technological error, computer viruses, or third-party action, including intentional misconduct by computer hackers or state actors, physical break-ins, the actions of state actors, industrial espionage, fraudulent inducement of employees, customers, or channel partners to disclose sensitive information such as user names or passwords, and


employee, customer, or channel partner error or malfeasance.  High-profile security breaches at other companies have increased in recent years. A security breach could result in unauthorized access to or disclosure, modification, misuse, loss, or destruction of our customers’, prospects’, vendors’, or channel partners’ data, our data (including our proprietary information, intellectual property, or trade secrets), or our cloud services offerings, networks or other systems, or the cloud environments we manage. Third parties may also conduct attacks designed to prevent access to critical data or systems through ransomware or temporarily deny customers access to our cloud environments.

We have experienced attempts by third parties to identify and exploit software and service vulnerabilities, penetrate or bypass our security measures, and gain unauthorized access to our or our customers’ or service providers’ cloud environments, networks, and other systems. Security measures that we or our third-party service providers have implemented may not be effective against all current or future security threats. Because there are many different security breach techniques and such techniques continue to evolve, we may be unable to anticipate, detect, or mitigate attempted security breaches and implement adequate preventative measures.  Third parties may


also conduct attacks designed to temporarily deny customers access to our cloud services.  Any security breach, ransomware attack, or successful denial of service attack could result in a loss of customer confidence in the security of our offerings and damage to our brand, reduce the demand for our offerings, disrupt our normal business operations, require us to spend material resources to investigate or correct the breach, require us to notify affected customers or individuals and/or applicable regulators and others, provide identity theft protection services to individuals, expose us to legal liabilities, including litigation, regulatory enforcement, and indemnity obligations, and materially adversely affect our revenuerevenues and operating results.  Our software operates in conjunction with and is dependent on third-party products and components across a broad ecosystem.  If there is a security vulnerability in one of these products or components, and if there is a security exploit targeting it, we could face increased costs, liability claims, customer dissatisfaction, reduced revenue, or harm to our reputation or competitive position.  

These risks will increase as we continue to grow the number and scale of our cloud-based offerings,cloud subscriptions and process, store, and transmit increasingly large amounts of our customers’, prospects’, vendors’, channel partners’, and our own informationdata.  In particular, in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been an increase in cyberattacks and data, which may include proprietary or confidential data or personal or identifying information.other malicious activities as shelter-in-place orders and remote working conditions have led businesses to increasingly rely on virtual environments and communication systems.

Risks Related to Our Bitcoin Strategy and Holdings

Our intellectual propertybitcoin strategy exposes us to various risks associated with bitcoin

In September 2020, our Board of Directors adopted our Treasury Reserve Policy, under which our treasury reserve assets will consist of (i) Cash Assets held by us that exceed working capital requirements and (ii) bitcoin held by us, with bitcoin serving as the primary treasury reserve asset on an ongoing basis, subject to market conditions and anticipated needs of the business for Cash Assets.  

In 2021, we determined to adopt, in addition to and in conjunction with our Treasury Reserve Policy, a business strategy of purchasing and holding bitcoin, and we may from time to time, subject to market conditions, issue debt or equity securities in capital raising transactions with the objective of using the proceeds to purchase bitcoin.

We have only recently adopted this bitcoin acquisition strategy and are continually examining the risks and rewards of such a strategy.  This strategy has not been tested over time or under various market conditions.  Some investors and other market participants may disagree with this strategy or actions we undertake to implement it.  If bitcoin prices fall or our bitcoin acquisition strategy otherwise proves unsuccessful, it would adversely impact the market price of our class A common stock.

As of February 8, 2021, we held approximately 71,079 bitcoins that were acquired at an aggregate purchase price of $1.145 billion and an average purchase price of approximately $16,109 per bitcoin, inclusive of fees and expenses. These purchases included purchases of bitcoin using the net proceeds of our issuance of $650.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 0.750% Convertible Senior Notes due 2025 (the “notes”) in the fourth quarter of 2020.  As part of our overall business strategy, we expect to purchase additional bitcoin in future periods, though we may also sell bitcoin in future periods as needed to generate Cash Assets for treasury management purposes.


While our bitcoin is valuable,currently owned directly by us, we are investigating other potential approaches to holding our bitcoin assets. If we change the means by which we hold our bitcoin assets, the accounting treatment for our bitcoin may correspondingly change. A change in the accounting treatment of our bitcoin holdings could have a material impact on our results of operations in future periods and any inabilitycould increase the volatility of our reported results of operations as well as affecting the carrying value of our bitcoin on our balance sheet, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our financial results and the market price of our class A common stock.

Bitcoin is a highly volatile asset that has traded below $4,000 per bitcoin and above $44,000 per bitcoin in our principal market in the 12 months preceding the date of this Annual Report. Bitcoin does not pay interest or other returns and so our ability to protect it could reducegenerate cash from our bitcoin holdings depends on sales. The impact of our bitcoin holdings on our financial results and the market price of our class A common stock is likely to increase as we increase our overall holdings of bitcoin in the future. See “Risks Related to Our Bitcoin Strategy and Holdings – Our historical financial statements do not reflect the potential variability in earnings that we may experience in the future relating to bitcoin holdings.”

Fluctuations in the price of bitcoin may significantly influence the market price of our class A common stock

To the extent investors view the value of our products, services,class A common stock as linked to the value or change in the value of our bitcoin, fluctuations in the price of bitcoin may significantly influence the market price of our class A common stock.

Our historical financial statements do not reflect the potential variability in earnings that we may experience in the future relating to bitcoin holdings

Our historical financial statements, including those for the year ended December 31, 2020, do not fully reflect the potential variability in earnings that we may experience in the future from holding or selling significant amounts of bitcoin.

The price of bitcoin has historically been subject to dramatic price fluctuations and brandis highly volatile. As explained more fully in Note 2(g) to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 included in this Annual Report, we determine the fair value of our bitcoin based on quoted (unadjusted) prices on the active exchange that we have determined is our principal market for bitcoin. We perform an analysis each quarter to identify whether events or changes in circumstances, principally decreases in the quoted (unadjusted) prices on the active exchange, indicate that it is more likely than not that any of our bitcoin assets is impaired. In determining if an impairment has occurred, we consider the lowest price of one bitcoin quoted on the active exchange at any time since acquiring the specific bitcoin held. If the carrying value of a bitcoin exceeds that lowest price at any time during the quarter, an impairment loss is deemed to have occurred with respect to that bitcoin in the amount equal to the difference between its carrying value and such lowest price, and subsequent increases in the price of bitcoin will not affect the carrying value of our bitcoin. Gains (if any) are not recorded until realized upon sale, at which point they would be presented net of any impairment losses. In determining the gain to be recognized upon sale, we calculate the difference between the sale price and carrying value of the specific bitcoin sold immediately prior to sale.

We relyAs a result, any decrease in the fair value of bitcoin below our carrying value for such assets at any time since their acquisition requires us to incur an impairment charge, and such charge could be material to our financial results for the applicable reporting period, which may create significant volatility in our reported earnings and decrease the carrying value of our digital assets, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our class A common stock.

At December 31, 2020, we carried $1.054 billion of digital assets on our balance sheet, consisting of approximately 70,469 bitcoin and reflecting $70.7 million in cumulative impairment losses attributable to bitcoin trading price fluctuations, and held $59.7 million in cash and cash equivalents, compared to no digital assets and $456.7 million in cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2019, reflecting the shift in our liquid asset holdings following the adoption of our Treasury Reserve Policy. Digital asset impairment losses of $70.7 million incurred during the year ended December 31, 2020 represented 17.5% of our operating expenses for the year, compared to no digital asset


impairment losses for the year ended December 31, 2019, contributing to our net loss of $7.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to net income of $34.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2019.

Because we intend to purchase additional bitcoin in future periods and increase our overall holdings of bitcoin, we expect that the proportion of our total assets represented by bitcoin holdings will increase in the future. As a result, volatility in our earnings in future periods may be significantly more than what we experienced in prior periods.

Changes in securities regulation may adversely impact the market price of our class A common stock

Although bitcoin and other digital assets have experienced a surge of investor attention since bitcoin was invented in 2008, investors in the United States currently have limited means to gain exposure to bitcoin through traditional investment channels such as 401(k) retirement accounts, and instead generally must hold bitcoin through “hosted” wallets provided by digital asset service providers or through “unhosted” wallets that expose the investor to risks associated with loss or hacking of their private keys. Given the relative novelty of digital assets, general lack of familiarity with the processes needed to hold bitcoin directly, as well as the potential reluctance of financial planners and advisers to recommend direct bitcoin holdings to their retail customers because of the manner in which such holdings are custodied, some investors have sought exposure to bitcoin through investment vehicles that hold bitcoin and issue shares representing fractional undivided interests in their underlying bitcoin holdings. Although a number of investment vehicles currently offer this exposure to bitcoin, none of these investment vehicles currently offers its shares directly to the public in the United States, and such shares are offered only to “accredited investors” on a combinationprivate placement basis. Investors who are not eligible to participate in these private placements may nevertheless purchase shares of copyrights, patents, trademarks, trade secrets, confidentiality procedures, and contractual commitmentsthese investment vehicles in the over-the-counter market, where such shares have historically traded at a premium to protect our intellectual property. Despite our efforts, these measures can only provide limited protection. Unauthorized third partiesthe net asset value (“NAV”) of the underlying bitcoin. These premiums have at times been substantial.

One reason for the substantial premium to NAV exhibited by the trading prices of shares of some bitcoin investment vehicles may trybe because of the relative scarcity of traditional investment vehicles providing investment exposure to copy or reverse engineer portionsbitcoin. To the extent investors view the value of our productsclass A common stock as providing such exposure, it is possible that the value of our class A common stock also includes a premium over the value of our bitcoin.

Another reason for the substantial premium to NAV exhibited by the trading prices of shares of some bitcoin investment vehicles is that such vehicles operate in a manner similar to closed-end investment funds as opposed to exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”) and therefore do not continuously offer to create and redeem their shares at NAV in exchange for bitcoin. Although several bitcoin investment vehicles have attempted to list their shares on a U.S. national securities exchange to permit them to function in the manner of an ETF with continuous share creation and redemption at NAV, to date the SEC has declined to approve any such listing, citing concerns over the surveillance of trading in markets for the underlying bitcoin as well as concerns about fraud and manipulation in bitcoin trading markets.

If the SEC were to resolve its concerns over surveillance of the bitcoin trading markets, it is possible that the SEC would permit the listing of ETFs specializing in bitcoin, allowing these funds to offer their shares directly to the public. In addition to greatly simplifying the task of gaining investment exposure to bitcoin, the listing of a bitcoin ETF with continuous share creation and redemption at NAV would be expected to eliminate the NAV premiums currently exhibited by shares of investment vehicles that trade in the over-the-counter market. To the extent that our class A common stock is viewed as an alternative-to-bitcoin investment vehicle and trades at a premium to the value of our bitcoin holdings, that premium may also be eliminated, causing the value of our class A common stock to decline.

In addition, any introduction of bitcoin ETFs on U.S. national securities exchanges may be viewed by investors as offering “pure play” exposure to bitcoin that would generally not be subject to federal income tax at the entity level as we are.

As a result of the foregoing factors, to the extent investors view our class A common stock as linked to the value of our bitcoin holdings, the introduction of bitcoin ETFs on U.S. national securities exchanges could have a material adverse effect on the market value of our class A common stock.


Our bitcoin holdings could subject us to regulatory scrutiny

As noted above, several bitcoin investment vehicles have attempted to list their shares on a U.S. national securities exchange to permit them to function in the manner of an ETF with continuous share creation and redemption at NAV. To date the SEC has declined to approve any such listing, citing concerns over the surveillance of trading in markets for the underlying bitcoin as well as concerns about fraud and manipulation in bitcoin trading markets. Even though we do not function in the manner of an ETF and do not offer continuous share creation and redemption at NAV, it is possible that we nevertheless could face regulatory scrutiny from the SEC, as a company with securities traded on The Nasdaq Global Select Market.

In addition, as digital assets, including bitcoin, have grown in popularity and market size, there has been increasing focus on the extent to which digital assets can be used to launder the proceeds of illegal activities or otherwise obtainfund criminal or terrorist activities, or entities subject to sanctions regimes. While we have implemented and maintain policies and procedures reasonably designed to promote compliance with applicable anti-money laundering and sanctions laws and regulations and take care to only acquire our bitcoin through entities subject to anti money laundering regulation and related compliance rules in the United States, if we are found to have purchased any of our bitcoin from bad actors that have used bitcoin to launder money or persons subject to sanctions, we may be subject to regulatory proceedings and further transactions or dealings in bitcoin may be restricted or prohibited.

Due to the unregulated nature and lack of transparency surrounding the operations of many bitcoin trading venues, they may experience fraud, security failures or operational problems, which may adversely affect the value of our bitcoin

Bitcoin trading venues are relatively new and, in some cases, unregulated. Furthermore, there are many bitcoin trading venues which do not provide the public with significant information regarding their ownership structure, management teams, corporate practices and regulatory compliance. As a result, the marketplace may lose confidence in bitcoin trading venues, including prominent exchanges that handle a significant volume of bitcoin trading.

For example, in 2019 there were reports claiming that 80-95% of bitcoin trading volume on trading venues was false or non-economic in nature, with specific focus on unregulated exchanges located outside of the United States. Such reports may indicate that the bitcoin market is significantly smaller than expected and that the United States makes up a significantly larger percentage of the bitcoin market than is commonly understood. Nonetheless, any actual or perceived false trading in the bitcoin market, and any other fraudulent or manipulative acts and practices, could adversely affect the value of our bitcoin.

Negative perception, a lack of stability in the broader bitcoin markets and the closure or temporary shutdown of bitcoin trading venues due to fraud, business failure, hackers or malware, or government-mandated regulation may reduce confidence in bitcoin and result in greater volatility in the prices of bitcoin. To the extent investors view our class A common stock as linked to the value of our bitcoin holdings, these potential consequences of a bitcoin trading venue’s failure could have a material adverse effect on the market value of our class A common stock.

The price of bitcoin may be influenced by regulatory, commercial, and technical factors that are highly uncertain

Bitcoin and other digital assets are relatively novel and are subject to various risks and uncertainties that may adversely impact their price. For example, the application of securities laws and other regulations to such assets is unclear in certain respects, and it is possible that regulators in the United States or foreign countries may create new regulations or interpret laws in a manner that adversely affects the price of bitcoin. The growth of the digital assets industry in general, and the use and acceptance of bitcoin in particular, may also impact the price of bitcoin and is subject to a high degree of uncertainty. The pace of worldwide growth in the adoption and use our intellectual property. Any patents ownedof bitcoin may depend, for instance, on public familiarity with digital assets, ease of buying and accessing bitcoin, institutional demand for bitcoin as an investment asset, consumer demand for bitcoin as a means of payment, and the availability and popularity of alternatives to bitcoin. Even if growth in bitcoin adoption occurs in the near or medium-term, there is no assurance that bitcoin usage will continue to grow over the long-term. Because bitcoin has no physical existence beyond the record of transactions on the Bitcoin blockchain, a variety of technical factors related to the Bitcoin blockchain could also impact the price of bitcoin. For example, malicious attacks by us“miners” who validate bitcoin transactions, inadequate mining fees to incentivize validating of bitcoin transactions, hard “forks” of the


Bitcoin blockchain into multiple blockchains, and advances in quantum computing could undercut the integrity of the Bitcoin blockchain and negatively affect the price of bitcoin. The liquidity of bitcoin may also be invalidated, circumvented,reduced and damage to the public perception of bitcoin may occur, if financial institutions were to deny banking services to businesses that hold bitcoin, provide bitcoin-related services or challenged. Anyaccept bitcoin as payment, which could also decrease the price of bitcoin.

The concentration of our pending or future patent applications, whether or not currently being challenged,bitcoin holdings enhances the risks inherent in our bitcoin acquisition strategy

As of February 8, 2021, we held approximately 71,079 bitcoins that were acquired at an aggregate purchase price of $1.145 billion and we intend to purchase additional bitcoin and increase our overall holdings of bitcoin in the future. The concentration of our bitcoin holdings limits the risk mitigation that we could take advantage of by purchasing a more diversified portfolio of treasury assets, and the absence of diversification enhances the risks inherent in our bitcoin acquisition strategy. If there is a significant decrease in the price of bitcoin, we will experience a more pronounced impact on our financial condition than if we used our cash to purchase a more diverse portfolio of assets.

Our bitcoin holdings are less liquid than our existing cash and cash equivalents and may not be issuedable to serve as a source of liquidity for us to the same extent as cash and cash equivalents

In September 2020, we adopted bitcoin as our primary treasury reserve asset. Historically, the bitcoin markets have been characterized by more price volatility, less liquidity, and lower trading volumes compared to sovereign currencies markets, as well as relative anonymity, a developing regulatory landscape, susceptibility to market abuse and manipulation, and various other risks inherent in its entirely electronic, virtual form and decentralized network. During times of market instability, we may not be able to sell our bitcoin at reasonable prices or at all. As a result, our bitcoin holdings may not be able to serve as a source of liquidity for us to the same extent as cash and cash equivalents. If we are unable to sell our bitcoin, or if we are forced to sell our bitcoin at a significant loss, in order to meet our working capital requirements, our business and financial condition could be negatively impacted.

If we or our third-party service providers experience a security breach or cyberattack and unauthorized parties obtain access to our bitcoin, we may lose some or all of our bitcoin and our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected

Security breaches and cyberattacks are of particular concern with respect to our bitcoin. Bitcoin and other blockchain-based cryptocurrencies have been, and may in the scopefuture be, subject to security breaches, cyberattacks, or other malicious activities. A successful security breach or cyberattack could result in a partial or total loss of our bitcoin in a manner that may not be covered by insurance or indemnity provisions of the claimscustody agreement with a custodian who holds our bitcoin. Such a loss could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

The loss or destruction of a private key required to access our bitcoin may be irreversible. If we are unable to access our private keys or if we experience a cyberattack or other data loss relating to our bitcoin, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Bitcoin is controllable only by the possessor of both the unique public key and private key relating to the local or online digital wallet in which the bitcoin is held. While the Bitcoin blockchain ledger requires a public key relating to a digital wallet to be published when used in a transaction, private keys must be safeguarded and kept private in order to prevent a third party from accessing the bitcoin held in such wallet. To the extent our private key is lost, destroyed, or otherwise compromised and no backup of the private key is accessible, we will be unable to access the bitcoin held in the related digital wallet. Furthermore, we cannot provide assurance that our digital wallets will not be compromised as a result of a cyberattack. The bitcoin and blockchain ledger, as well as other cryptocurrencies and blockchain technologies, have been, and may in the future be, subject to security breaches, cyberattacks, or other malicious activities.

In light of the significant amount of bitcoin we hold, we are continuing to seek if at all. Moreover, amendments to and developing jurisprudence regarding U.S. patent law may affecta greater degree of diversification in the use of custodial services as the extent of potential risk of loss is dependent, in part, on the degree of diversification. As of December 31, 2020, the insurance that covers losses of our ability to protectbitcoin holdings is only a small


fraction of the entirety of our intellectual property and defend against claims of patent infringement. In addition, although we generally enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees, our former employees may seek employment with our business partners, customers, or competitors,holdings, and there can be no assuranceguarantee that such insurance will be maintained as part of the custodial services we have or that such coverage will cover losses with respect to our bitcoin.

Regulatory change reclassifying bitcoin as a security could lead to our classification as an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and could adversely affect the market price of bitcoin and the market price of our class A common stock.

While senior SEC officials have stated their view that bitcoin is not a “security” for purposes of the federal securities laws, the SEC has so far refused to permit the listing of any bitcoin-based exchange traded funds, citing, among other things, concerns regarding bitcoin market integrity and custodial protections.  It is possible that the confidential natureSEC could take a contrary position to the one taken by its senior officials or a federal court could conclude that bitcoin is a security.  Such a determination could lead to our classification as an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which would subject us to significant additional regulatory controls that could have a material adverse effect on our intellectual property will be maintained. Furthermore, the laws of some countries do not provide the same level of protection of our intellectual property as do the laws of the United States. If we cannot protect our intellectual property against unauthorized copying or use, webusiness and operations and also may not remain competitive.

Third parties may claim we infringe their intellectual property rights

We periodically receive notices from third parties claiming we are infringing their intellectual property rights, principally patent and trademark rights. We expect the number of such claims will increase as we continue to expand our offerings and branding, the number of offerings and level of competition in our industry segments grow, the functionality of offerings overlaps, and the volume of issued patents, patent applications, and trademark registrations continues to increase. Responding to any infringement claim, regardless of its validity, could:

be time-consuming, costly, and/or result in litigation;

divert management’s time and attention from developing our business;

require us to pay monetary damages or enter into royaltysubstantially change the manner in which we conduct our business.

In addition, if bitcoin is determined to constitute a security for purposes of the federal securities laws, the additional regulatory restrictions imposed by those laws could adversely affect the market price of bitcoin and licensing agreements that we would not normally find acceptable;

require us to stop selling certainin turn adversely affect the market price of our offerings;class A common stock.

require usRisks Related to redesign certainOur Class A Common Stock

The market price of our offerings using alternative non-infringing technology or practices, which could require significant effortclass A common stock has been and expense;

require usmay continue to rename certainbe volatile

The market price of our offerings or entities; or

require us to satisfy indemnification obligations toclass A common stock has historically been volatile and this volatility has been significant in recent periods. Since August 11, 2020, the date on which we announced our customers and channel partners.

Additionally, while we monitor our useinitial purchase of third-party software, including open source software, we cannot assure you that our processes for controlling such use in our products will be effective.  If we inadvertently embed certain types of open source software into one or morebitcoin, the closing price of our products, or if third-party software that we license is foundclass A common stock has increased from $123.62 as of August 10, 2020, the last trading day before our announcement, to infringe intellectual property rights$1,272.94 as of others, we could subject ourselves to infringement liability and be required to re-engineer our products, discontinue the saleFebruary 9, 2021. The market price of our products if re-engineering could not be accomplished on a timely or cost-effective basis, or make availableclass A common stock may fluctuate widely in response to certain third parties or generally available, in source code form, our proprietary code, anyvarious factors, some of which could materially adversely affectare beyond our business, operating results, and financial condition.control. These factors include, but are not limited to:

quarterly variations in our results of operations or those of our competitors;

announcements about our earnings that are not in line with analyst expectations, the likelihood of which may be enhanced because it is our policy not to give guidance relating to our anticipated financial performance in future periods;

announcements by us or our competitors of acquisitions, dispositions, new offerings, significant contracts, commercial relationships, or capital commitments;

fluctuations in the price of bitcoin, in which we have significant holdings, and expect we will continue to make, significant purchases, and announcements about our transactions in bitcoin;

our ability to develop, market, and deliver new and enhanced offerings on a timely basis;

commencement of, or our involvement in, litigation;

recommendations by securities analysts or changes in earnings estimates and our ability to meet those estimates;

investor perception of our Company;

announcements by our competitors of their earnings that are not in line with analyst expectations;

the volume of shares of our class A common stock available for public sale;

sales or purchases of stock by us or by our stockholders and issuances of awards under our stock incentive plan; and

general economic conditions and slow or negative growth of related markets, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.


If a successful infringement claim is made against usIn addition, the stock market and we failthe market for technology companies have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to develop or license a substitute technology or brand name, as applicable,the operating performance of companies in those markets. These market and industry factors may seriously harm the market price of our business, resultsclass A common stock, regardless of operations, financial condition, or cash flows could be materially adversely affected.our actual operating performance.

Because of the rights of our two classes of common stock and because we are controlled by Michael J. Saylor, who beneficially owns the majority of our class B common stock, Mr. Saylor could transfer control of MicroStrategy to a third party without the approval of our Board of Directors or our other stockholders, prevent a third party from acquiring us, or limit yourthe ability of our other stockholders to influence corporate matters

We have two classes of common stock: class A common stock and class B common stock.  Holders of our class A common stock generally have the same rights as holders of our class B common stock, except that holders of class A common stock have one vote per share while holders of class B common stock have ten votes per share.  As of January 26, 2018,February 2, 2021, holders of our class B common stock owned 2,035,1841,964,025 shares of class B common stock, or 68.4%72.0% of the total voting power.  As of January 26, 2018,February 2, 2021, Mr. Saylor, our Chairman of the Board of Directors President & Chief Executive Officer, beneficially owned 2,011,6681,961,668 shares of class B common stock, or 67.6%72.0% of the total voting power.  Accordingly, Mr. Saylor can control MicroStrategy through his ability to determine the outcome of elections of our directors, amend our certificate of incorporation and by-laws, and take other actions requiring the vote or consent of stockholders, including mergers, going-private transactions, and other extraordinary transactions and their terms.

Our certificate of incorporation allows holders of class B common stock to transfer shares of class B common stock, subject to the approval of stockholders holding a majority of the outstanding class B common stock.  Mr. Saylor or a group of stockholders holding a majority of the outstanding class B common stock could, without the approval of our Board of Directors or our other stockholders, transfer voting control of MicroStrategy to a third party.  Such a transfer of control could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.  Mr. Saylor or a group of stockholders holding a majority of the outstanding class B common stock could also prevent a change of control of MicroStrategy, regardless of whether holders of class A common stock might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over the then current market price. In addition, this concentrated control limits stockholders’ ability to influence corporate matters and, as a result, we may take actions that our non-controlling stockholders do not view as beneficial or that conflict with their interests.  As a result, the market price of our class A common stock could be materially adversely affected.

Our status as a “controlled company” could make our class A common stock less attractive to some investors or otherwise materially adversely affect our stock price

Because we qualify as a “controlled company” under theNasdaq corporate governance rules, for NASDAQ-listed companies, we are not required to have independent directors comprise a majority of our Board of Directors. Additionally, our Board of Directors is not required to have an independent compensation or nominating committee or to have the independent directors exercise the nominating function. We are also not required to have the compensation of our executive officers be determined by a compensation committee of independent directors.  In addition, we are not required to empower our Compensation Committee with the authority to engage the services of any compensation consultants, legal counsel, or other advisors, or to have the Compensation Committee assess the independence of compensation consultants, legal counsel, and other advisors that it engages.

In light of our status as a controlled company, our Board of Directors has determined not to establish an independent nominating committee or have its independent directors exercise the nominating function and has elected instead to have the Board of Directors be directly responsible for nominating members of the Board.  A majority of our Board of Directors is currently comprised of independent directors, and our Board of Directors has established a Compensation Committee comprised entirely of independent directors. The Compensation Committee determines the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer.  However, our Board of Directors has authorized our Chief Executive Officer to determine the compensation of executive officers other than himself, rather than having such compensation determined by the Compensation Committee, except that certain performance-based executive officer compensation that is intended to qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code is determined by the Compensation Committee pursuantCommittee.  Awards made to directors and officers subject to Section 16 of the requirements of Section 162(m).  AwardsExchange Act under our 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended, the “2013 Equity Plan”) are also approved by the Compensation Committee.  Additionally, while our Compensation Committee is empowered with


the authority to retain and terminate outside counsel, compensation consultants, and other experts or consultants, it is not required to assess their independence.


Although currently a majority of our Board of Directors is comprised of independent directors and the Compensation Committee is comprised entirely of independent directors, we may elect in the future not to have independent directors constitute a majority of the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee, have our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation determined by a compensation committee of independent directors, or have a compensation committee of the Board of Directors at all.

Accordingly, should the interests of our controlling stockholder differ from those of other stockholders, the other stockholders may not have the same protections that are afforded to stockholders of companies that are required to follow all of the Nasdaq corporate governance rules for NASDAQ-listed companies.rules. Our status as a controlled company could make our class A common stock less attractive to some investors or otherwise materially adversely affect our stock price.

Revenue recognition accounting pronouncementsFuture sales, or the perception of future sales, of our class A common stock, convertible debt instruments or other convertible securities could depress the price of our class A common stock.

We may materiallyissue and sell additional shares of class A common stock, convertible notes, or other securities in subsequent offerings to raise capital or issue shares for other purposes, including in connection with the acquisition of additional bitcoin. We cannot predict:

the size of future issuances of equity securities,

the size and terms of future issuances of convertible debt instruments or other convertible securities

the effect, if any, that future issuances and sales of our securities will have on the market price of the class A common stock.

Transactions involving newly issued class A common stock or other convertible debt instruments or other convertible securities could result in dilution, possibly substantial, to holders of our class A common stock.

Risks Relating to Our Outstanding Convertible Notes and Potential Future Indebtedness

We may not have the ability to raise the funds necessary to settle conversions of the notes in cash or to repurchase the notes upon a fundamental change, and our future debt may contain limitations on our ability to pay cash upon conversion or repurchase of the notes

Holders of the notes will have the right to require us to repurchase all or a portion of their notes upon the occurrence of a fundamental change at a fundamental change repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, as described in the indenture governing the notes (the “indenture”). In addition, upon conversion of the notes, unless we elect (or have previously irrevocably elected) to deliver solely shares of our class A common stock to settle such conversion (other than paying cash in lieu of delivering any fractional share), we will be required to make cash payments in respect of the notes being converted as described in the indenture. However, we may not have enough available cash or be able to obtain financing at the time we are required to make repurchases of notes surrendered therefor or notes being converted. In addition, our ability to repurchase the notes or to pay cash upon conversions of the notes may be limited by law, by regulatory authority or by agreements governing our future indebtedness. Our failure to repurchase notes at a time when the repurchase is required by the indenture or to pay any cash payable on future conversions of the notes as required by the indenture would constitute a default under the indenture. A default under the indenture or the fundamental change itself could also lead to a default under agreements governing our existing or future indebtedness. If the repayment of the related indebtedness were to be accelerated after any applicable notice or grace periods, we may not have sufficient funds to repay the indebtedness and repurchase the notes or make cash payments upon conversions thereof.


The conditional conversion feature of the notes, if triggered, may adversely affect our reportedfinancial condition and operating results

In the event the conditional conversion feature of operationsthe notes is triggered, holders of notes will be entitled to convert the notes at any time during specified periods at their option. If one or more holders elect to convert their notes, unless we elect to satisfy our conversion obligation by delivering solely shares of our class A common stock (other than paying cash in lieu of delivering any fractional share), we would be required to settle a portion or all of our conversion obligation through the payment of cash, which could adversely affect our liquidity. In addition, even if holders do not elect to convert their notes, we could be required under applicable accounting rules to reclassify all or a portion of the outstanding principal of the notes as a current rather than long-term liability, which would result in a material reduction of our net working capital.

Servicing our debt will require a significant amount of cash, and we may not have sufficient cash flow from our business to pay our indebtedness

As of the date of this Annual Report, there are outstanding $650 million in aggregate principal amount of the notes. In addition, our bitcoin acquisition strategy anticipates that we may issue additional debt in future periods to finance additional purchases of bitcoin. Our ability to make scheduled payments of the principal of, to pay interest on or to refinance our indebtedness, including the notes or any subsequently issued indebtedness, depends on our future performance, which is subject to economic, financial, competitive and other factors beyond our control. Our business may not continue to generate cash flow from operations in the future sufficient to service our debt and make necessary capital expenditures. If we are unable to generate such cash flow, we may be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as selling bitcoin or other assets, restructuring debt or obtaining additional equity capital on terms that may be onerous or highly dilutive. Our ability to refinance our indebtedness will depend on the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. We continuously reviewmay not be able to engage in any of these activities or engage in these activities on desirable terms, which could result in a default on our compliance with all new and existing revenue recognitiondebt obligations.

The accounting pronouncements.  method for convertible debt securities that may be settled in cash and/or shares, such as the notes, could have a material effect on our diluted earnings per share

In May 2014,August 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued(FASB) published Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from2020-06, Debt-Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40), Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)in an Entity’s Own Equity (“ASU 2014-09”2020-06”), which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance.. These amendments are effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, with early adoption permitted, but no earlier than fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. We willintend to early adopt this guidance and its subsequentthe amendments effective as of January 1, 2018 and will adjust prior period consolidated financial statements to reflect full retrospective adoption, beginning with our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the first quarter of 2018.  We currently estimate that the adoption2021.  As a result of this guidanceearly adoption, the notes will be subject to the “if-converted” method for calculating diluted earnings per share. Under the “if-converted” method, diluted earnings per share will be calculated assuming that all of the notes were converted solely into shares of common stock at the beginning of the reporting period, unless the result in earlier recognition of revenue from term license sales and saleswould be anti-dilutive, which may adversely affect our diluted earnings per share. Refer to channel partners and will result in the capitalization of certain variable costs (such as sales commissions) that we had previously expensed as incurred. See Note 3, Recent Accounting Standards, to theour Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regardingdetail on the impact of adopting ASU 2014-09.  2020-06 on diluted earnings per share.

 

 

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

 

 

Item 2.

Properties

As of December 31, 2017,2020, we leased approximately 214,000 square feet of office space at a location in Northern Virginia that began servingserves as our corporate headquarters in October 2010headquarters. This lease provides for certain tenant allowances and was toincentives and will expire in December 2020.2030.  In December 2020, we exercised an option to early terminate approximately 24,000 square feet of space at our corporate headquarters at the beginning of January 2018, we amended the lease to extend the lease term through December 2030.  See Note 17, Subsequent Events, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.  2022.


In addition, we lease offices in U.S. and foreign locations for our services and support, sales and marketing, research and development, and administrative personnel. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we leased approximately 28,00027,000 square feet of office and other space in the United States, in addition to our corporate headquarters, and approximately 181,000151,000 square feet of office space in various foreign locations.

 

 

Item 3.

In December 2011, DataTern, Inc. (“DataTern”) filed a complaint for patent infringement against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (the “District Court”). The complaint alleged that the Company infringes U.S. Patent No. 6,101,502 (the “’502 Patent”), allegedly owned by DataTern, by making, selling, or offering for sale several of the Company’s products and services, including MicroStrategy 9™, MicroStrategy Intelligence Server™, MicroStrategy Business Intelligence Platform™, MicroStrategy Cloud Personal, and other MicroStrategy applications for creating or using data mining, dashboards, business analytics, data storage and warehousing, and web hosting support.  The complaint accused the Company of willful infringement and sought an unspecified amount of damages, an award of attorneys’ fees, and preliminary and permanent injunctive relief. In light of a judgment in a separate action involving DataTern in another jurisdiction, in February 2013, MicroStrategy and DataTern filed motions for summary judgment of non-infringement and the District Court entered summary judgment against DataTern.  In March 2013, DataTern filed a notice of appeal with


the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the “Federal Circuit”).  In December 2014, the Federal Circuit issued an opinion vacating the District Court’s summary judgment, stating that the claim construction on which the summary judgment was based was incorrect.  In January 2015, the case was remanded to the District Court for further proceedings.  A claim construction ruling was issued in February 2017.  In August 2017, counsel for DataTern filed a motion to withdraw from the lawsuit.  The District Court initially gave DataTern a deadline of September 18, 2017 to find replacement counsel, which was later extended to October 20, 2017.  On October 20, 2017, the District Court dismissed the case for failure to prosecute when DataTern failed to identify substitute counsel.  We have received indemnification requests from certain of our channel partners and customers who were sued by DataTern in the District Court in lawsuits alleging infringement of the ‘502 Patent.  The proceedings against these channel partners and customers were stayed pending the resolution of DataTern’s lawsuit against the Company.  On October 30, 2017, the District Court dismissed with prejudice these channel partner and customer proceedings.

We are also involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business.  Although the outcomes of these other legal proceedings are inherently difficult to predict, we do not expect the resolution of these other legal proceedings to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

 

 

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

 

 


PART II

 

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our class A common stock is traded on the NASDAQNasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “MSTR.”  The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices for the class A common stock for the periods indicated as reported by the NASDAQ Global Select Market:

 

 

High

 

 

Low

 

Year ended December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

205.96

 

 

$

182.22

 

Second Quarter

 

 

194.58

 

 

 

177.50

 

Third Quarter

 

 

196.35

 

 

 

122.91

 

Fourth Quarter

 

 

143.37

 

 

 

128.00

 

Year ended December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

182.30

 

 

$

141.01

 

Second Quarter

 

 

195.99

 

 

 

165.02

 

Third Quarter

 

 

191.76

 

 

 

161.90

 

Fourth Quarter

 

 

207.28

 

 

 

162.72

 

There is no established public trading market for our class B common stock. As of January 26, 2018,February 2, 2021, there were approximately 1,4261,152 stockholders of record of our class A common stock and threetwo stockholders of record of our class B common stock.

Holders of our class A common stock generally have the same rights as holders of our class B common stock, except that holders of class A common stock have one vote per share while holders of class B common stock have ten votes per share.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on either our class A or class B common stock and have no current plans to declare or pay any such dividends.

Information regarding our equity compensation plans and the securities authorized for issuance thereunder is incorporated herein by reference into “Part III. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.”

The following table provides information about our repurchases of equity securities that are registered by us pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act during the periods indicated:

 

 

 

 

(a)

 

 

(b)

 

 

(c)

 

 

(d)

 

 

Period

 

 

Total

Number of

Shares (or

Units) Purchased

 

 

Average

Price Paid

per Share

(or Unit) (1)

 

 

Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1)

 

 

Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1)

 

 

October 1, 2017 – October 31, 2017

 

 

0

 

 

N/A

 

 

0

 

 

$

454,708,615

 

 

November 1, 2017 – November 30, 2017

 

 

0

 

 

N/A

 

 

0

 

 

$

454,708,615

 

 

December 1, 2017 – December 31, 2017

 

 

0

 

 

N/A

 

 

0

 

 

$

454,708,615

 

 

 

Total:

 

 

0

 

 

N/A

 

 

0

 

 

$

454,708,615

 

 

 

 

 

(a)

 

 

 

(b)

 

 

(c)

 

 

 

(d)

 

 

Period

 

 

Total

Number of

Shares (or

Units) Purchased

 

 

 

Average

Price Paid

per Share

(or Unit) (1)

 

 

Total Number of

Shares (or Units)

Purchased as Part of

Publicly Announced

Plans or Programs (1)

 

 

 

Maximum Number (or

Approximate Dollar

Value) of Shares (or

Units) that May Yet Be

Purchased Under the

Plans or Programs (1)

 

 

October 1, 2020 – October 31, 2020

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

$

209,137,964

 

 

November 1, 2020 – November 30, 2020

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

$

209,137,964

 

 

December 1, 2020 – December 31, 2020

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

$

209,137,964

 

 

Total:

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

$

209,137,964

 

 

 

(1)

On July 28, 2005, we announced that the Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase up to an aggregate of $300.0 million of our class A common stock from time to time on the open market (the “2005 Share“Share Repurchase Program”). On April 29, 2008, the Board of Directors amended the 2005The Share Repurchase Program was subsequently amended to increase the amountauthorize us to repurchase up to an aggregate of $800.0 million of our class A common stock that we are authorized to repurchase from $300.0 million to $800.0 million and extended the term of the 2005 Share Repurchase Program to April 29, 2013.  On


April 25, 2013, the Board of Directors extended the term of the 2005 Share Repurchase Program through April 29, 2018,2023, although the program may be suspended or discontinued by us at any time.  The timing and amount of any shares repurchased will be determined by management based on its evaluation of market conditions and other factors.  The 2005 Share Repurchase Program may be funded using our working capital, as well as proceeds from any other funding arrangements that we may enter into in the future.  As of December 31, 2017,2020, pursuant to the 2005 Share Repurchase Program, we had repurchased an aggregate of 3,826,9475,674,226 shares of our class A common stock at an average price per share of $90.23$104.13 and an aggregate cost of $345.3$590.9 million.  As of December 31, 2017, $454.72020, $209.1 million of our class A common stock remained available for repurchase pursuant to the 2005 Share Repurchase Program.  The average price per share and aggregate cost amounts disclosed above include broker commissions.


Performance Graph

The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our class A common stock from December 31, 20122015 (the last trading day before the beginning of our fifth preceding fiscal year) to December 29, 201731, 2020 (the last trading day of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017)2020) with the cumulative total return of (i) the Total Return Index for The NASDAQNasdaq Stock Market (U.S. Companies) (the “NASDAQ“Nasdaq Composite Index”) and (ii) the NASDAQNasdaq Computer Index.  The graph assumes the investment of $100.00 on December 31, 20122015 in our class A common stock, the NASDAQNasdaq Composite Index, and the NASDAQNasdaq Computer Index, and assumes that any dividends are reinvested. Measurement points are December 31, 2012, December 31, 2013, December 31, 2014, December 31, 2015, December 30, 2016, December 29, 2017, December 31, 2018, December 31, 2019, and December 29, 2017.31, 2020.

 

 

 

 

12/31/12

 

 

12/31/13

 

 

12/31/14

 

 

12/31/15

 

 

12/30/16

 

 

12/29/17

 

MicroStrategy Incorporated

 

$

100.00

 

 

$

133.05

 

 

$

173.91

 

 

$

192.00

 

 

$

211.39

 

 

$

140.61

 

NASDAQ Composite Index

 

$

100.00

 

 

$

140.12

 

 

$

160.78

 

 

$

171.97

 

 

$

187.22

 

 

$

242.71

 

NASDAQ Computer Index

 

$

100.00

 

 

$

134.07

 

 

$

163.15

 

 

$

175.66

 

 

$

200.32

 

 

$

281.21

 

 

 

12/31/15

 

 

12/30/16

 

 

12/29/17

 

 

12/31/18

 

 

12/31/19

 

 

12/31/20

 

MicroStrategy Incorporated

 

$

100.00

 

 

$

110.10

 

 

$

73.23

 

 

$

71.25

 

 

$

79.55

 

 

$

216.72

 

Nasdaq Composite Index

 

$

100.00

 

 

$

108.87

 

 

$

141.13

 

 

$

137.12

 

 

$

187.44

 

 

$

271.64

 

Nasdaq Computer Index

 

$

100.00

 

 

$

114.04

 

 

$

160.09

 

 

$

155.89

 

 

$

236.87

 

 

$

355.27

 

 

 


Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto, and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report.

As discussed in Note 3, Recent Accounting Standards, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we adopted ASU 2014-09 effective as of January 1, 2018 and adjusted our prior period Consolidated Financial Statements to reflect full retrospective adoption. In our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We previously operated Angel.com, a provider10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, our Statements of cloud-based Customer Experience Management solutionsOperations Data for Interactive Voice Responsethe years ended December 31, 2017 and contact centers.  In 2013, we completed the sale2016 and our Balance Sheet Data as of our equity interest in Angel.comDecember 31, 2017 and have classified the gain on sale and preceding operations of the Angel.com business as discontinued operations2016 in the following selected consolidated financial data.data below were also adjusted to reflect the full retrospective adoption of ASU 2014-09, where applicable.  No further adjustments for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 have been made in this Annual Report.

As discussed in Note 3, Recent Accounting Standards, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), and its subsequent amendments (“ASU 2016-02”) effective as of January 1, 2019 and did not restate comparative prior period Consolidated Financial Statements. As such, certain Balance Sheet Data for preceding years are not directly comparable to the Balance Sheet Data as of December 31, 2019 and 2020.

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Statements of Operations Data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

 

$

504,543

 

 

$

512,161

 

 

$

529,869

 

 

$

579,830

 

 

$

575,888

 

Income from continuing operations, net of tax

 

$

17,643

 

 

$

90,908

 

 

$

105,931

 

 

$

5,035

 

 

$

26,550

 

Discontinued operations, net of tax

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

56,782

 

Net income

 

$

17,643

 

 

$

90,908

 

 

$

105,931

 

 

$

5,035

 

 

$

83,332

 

Earnings per share (1)(2):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic, from continuing operations

 

$

1.54

 

 

$

7.96

 

 

$

9.33

 

 

$

0.45

 

 

$

2.35

 

Basic, from discontinued operations

 

0.00

 

 

0.00

 

 

0.00

 

 

 

0.00

 

 

 

5.02

 

Basic earnings per share

 

$

1.54

 

 

$

7.96

 

 

$

9.33

 

 

$

0.45

 

 

$

7.37

 

Diluted, from continuing operations

 

$

1.53

 

 

$

7.89

 

 

$

9.18

 

 

$

0.44

 

 

$

2.35

 

Diluted, from discontinued operations

 

0.00

 

 

0.00

 

 

0.00

 

 

 

0.00

 

 

 

5.02

 

Diluted earnings per share

 

$

1.53

 

 

$

7.89

 

 

$

9.18

 

 

$

0.44

 

 

$

7.37

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(as adjusted)

 

 

(as adjusted)

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Statements of Operations Data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

 

$

480,735

 

 

$

486,327

 

 

$

497,638

 

 

$

503,843

 

 

$

513,589

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(7,524

)

 

$

34,355

 

 

$

22,501

 

 

$

18,195

 

 

$

92,239

 

(Loss) earnings per share (1)(2):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic (loss) earnings per share

 

$

(0.78

)

 

$

3.35

 

 

$

1.98

 

 

$

1.59

 

 

$

8.07

 

Diluted (loss) earnings per share

 

$

(0.78

)

 

$

3.33

 

 

$

1.97

 

 

$

1.58

 

 

$

8.01

 

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(as adjusted)

 

 

(as adjusted)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Balance Sheet Data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets, excluding held-for-sale

 

$

835,728

 

 

$

768,319

 

 

$

656,894

 

 

$

558,797

 

 

$

585,514

 

Long-term liabilities, excluding deferred revenue, advance payments, and held-for-sale

 

$

50,150

 

 

$

16,741

 

 

$

19,960

 

 

$

26,208

 

 

$

32,699

 

Total assets

 

$

1,465,612

 

 

$

916,571

 

 

$

855,768

 

 

$

933,219

 

 

$

869,716

 

Long-term liabilities, excluding deferred revenue and advance payments

 

$

612,287

 

 

$

133,850

 

 

$

61,299

 

 

$

50,150

 

 

$

16,741

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

$

590,539

 

 

$

552,177

 

 

$

455,281

 

 

$

324,471

 

 

$

310,326

 

 

$

553,045

 

 

$

508,559

 

 

$

529,731

 

 

$

605,726

 

 

$

566,317

 

 

(1)

Basic and fully diluted (loss) earnings per share for class A and class B common stock are the same.

(2)

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on either class A or class B common stock.

 

 


Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Information

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Exchange Act.  For this purpose, any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact, including without limitation, certain statements regarding industry prospects and our results of operations or financial position, may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The important factors discussed under “Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors,” among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by forward-looking statements made herein and presented elsewhere by management from time to time. Such forward-looking statements represent management’s current expectations and are inherently uncertain. Investors are warned that actual results may differ from management’s expectations.

OverviewManagement’s Discussion and Analysis for the Year Ended December 31, 2018

MicroStrategy is a leading worldwide providerManagement’s discussion and analysis of enterprise analyticsfinancial condition and mobility software. Our mission is to provide enterprise customers with a world-class software platform and expert services so they can deploy unique intelligence applications.

MicroStrategy 10,results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018, including comparison of our flagship platform offering, consolidates analytics and mobility in a single unified platform. The MicroStrategy 10 platform is available on Windows, Linux and AWS, and as a hosted service offering through MicroStrategy Cloud.  Our platform offers a comprehensive suite of business intelligence functionality, from data discovery to mobile analytics, data mining, Big Data analytics, enterprise reporting and powerful identity intelligence generated by digital credentials.  MicroStrategy 10 builds on proven enterprise capabilities to make sophisticated, high-performance analytics more accessible, easier to use, and faster. MicroStrategy 10 consists of MicroStrategy Analytics, MicroStrategy Mobile, and Usher.

MicroStrategy Analytics empowers large organizations to analyze vast amounts of data and securely distribute actionable business insight throughout an enterprise, while also being able to cater to smaller workgroups and departmental use via MicroStrategy Desktop.  MicroStrategy Analytics delivers reports and dashboards, and enables users to conduct ad hoc analysis and share insights anywhere, anytime, via mobile devices (via MicroStrategy Mobile) or the web (via MicroStrategy Web).  It also combines the agility and productivity of self-service visual data discovery with the security, scalability, and governance features of enterprise-grade business intelligence.  Additionally, MicroStrategy Analytics delivers powerful identity intelligence on user behavior and resource utilization (via Usher).  

MicroStrategy Web is the primary interface for analysts, data scientists, consumers and developers, offering interactive reporting, dashboarding, and ad-hoc data discovery capabilities through a web browser. With MicroStrategy Web, users can design and deliver reports and dashboards across various styles of business intelligence, including scorecards, pixel-perfect documents and invoices, and interactive reports and dashboards, as well as for visual data discovery. MicroStrategy Web can also connect to a wide range of data sources, and be used to build sophisticated advanced analytical models that may be inserted within reports and dashboards.  MicroStrategy reports and dashboards can be personalized and automatically delivered to thousands of users with MicroStrategy Server’s advanced distribution capabilities. Web applications can also be extensively customized and embedded into other applications using MicroStrategy Web SDK for a branded experience.

MicroStrategy Desktop is a free, standalone, on-premise, single-user tool for fast, powerful, and easy-to-use self-service visual data discovery.  It enables business users to analyze and gain valuable insight and understanding into their organizations’ data by quickly creating stunning and useful visualizations, without assistance from the IT department.  MicroStrategy Desktop can be readily downloaded and installed on a PC or Mac, making the power of MicroStrategy 10 easily available. MicroStrategy Desktop can be used while offline and while not connected to MicroStrategy Server.  MicroStrategy Desktop connects to MicroStrategy Server when needed, allowing for governance workflows that deliver data discovery capabilities to the enterprise at scale.


MicroStrategy Mobile is fully integrated into the MicroStrategy Analytics platform, so it is easy to leverage existing reports and dashboards to instantly deploy mobile business intelligence. In addition, MicroStrategy Mobile extends beyond analytics to enable organizations to rapidly build custom enterprise mobility applications that deliver analytics combined with transactions, multimedia, and mapping to support business workflows.  The robust code-free application development platform is designed to reduce development costs and accelerate the deployment of native mobile business apps optimized for both iOS and Android.  Companies can build fully native iOS and Android apps that take advantage of the unique device and operating system capabilities (e.g., GPS/location, calendar, and camera) on those devices.  MicroStrategy Mobile is an easy, fast, and cost-effective vehicle for mobilizing an organization’s information systems, including its data warehouses, business intelligence, ERP, CRM, and web applications that are currently accessible only on the desktop.  With MicroStrategy Mobile, businesses can transform their entire workforce into a connected and more productive mobile workforce.  With mobile access to critical corporate data and systems that drive the business, employees can have a virtual office in their hands at all times.  MicroStrategy Mobile also enables companies to deploy customized, white-labeled mobile apps to business partners and customers. These apps can serve as new or enhanced offerings that differentiate an organization’s product or service to business partners or customers.

Usher delivers to its users unique mobile identity badges, each cryptographically linked to its owner’s smartphone and dynamically linked to the enterprise’s existing identity repositories, that are highly secure and convenient for organizations to deploy. Usher badges work on standard smartphones running on iOS or the Android platform and include an Apple Watch integration. Through the use of Bluetooth, QR codes, biometrics, push notifications, time-limited PIN codes, and other authentication methods, Usher badge users can log into applications, VPNs, and workstations, unlock doors and other physical gateways, and validate each other’s identities. Usher badge users are also able to scan barcodes for asset tracking applications. Usher can additionally serve as a powerful enterprise productivity tool with Usher Professional, a dynamic and searchable employee directory that facilitates communication among users, and gives managers insight into the location and activity of their distributed workforce. Usher Professional users can view badge user activity on a nearly real-time map and manage or direct their workforce by engaging in two-way communication with badge users. In the EIoT paradigm, interactions between Usher users and enterprise resources generate real-time telemetry, which can be efficiently harnessed in Usher Analytics, creating actionable intelligence.  By delivering strong yet convenient authentication that can be extended to nearly every corporate system, Usher can uncover insights, reduce infrastructure complexity, and secure assets -- all to help businesses flourish in the age of connected devices and connected people. Usher addresses some of the biggest challenges facing corporations today, including authentication, identity and access management, and resource authorization, while applying industry-leading business intelligence and analytics to an enterprise’s infrastructure.  

MicroStrategy on AWS allows organizations to harness the power of data through our enterprise solutions via the cloud.  Compared to traditional on-premise approaches, MicroStrategy on AWS is architected to deliver best-of-breed MicroStrategy software via the cloud, with pre-configured, ready-to-go servers, coupled with the required supporting infrastructure.  With MicroStrategy on AWS, customers can launch enterprise analytics environments within minutes via a web-based provisioning tool, and use the full MicroStrategy 10 offering.  MicroStrategy on AWS deploys MicroStrategy directly into the customer’s AWS account where the customer maintains and manages the environment.

For customers looking for a Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) experience, MicroStrategy Cloud offers managed services that deliver the full breadth of platform capabilities along with a dedicated cloud operations team to deploy the platform in the cloud.  MicroStrategy Cloud is well suited for organizations without extensive IT resources to maintain and manage the cloud infrastructure on their own.  MicroStrategy Cloud offers a 99.9% Service Level Agreement for availability, and is backed by a team of experts and dedicated tech support staff that provides continuous monitoring and alerting.  MicroStrategy Cloud maintains and keeps up to date on compliance and security certifications to help ensure the environments adhere to the Service Organization Control 2, ISO 27001, Payment Card Industry, HIPAA, and Privacy Shield standards.

System integrators, value-added resellers, and OEMs around the world rely on the capabilities of the MicroStrategy platform, including its functionality, workflows, report presentation, user management, security, administration, system configuration, and monitoring, to build branded and custom applications of their own. Our platform’s open architecture and APIs make it especially suitable for developing custom functionality or integrating with other applications.  Organizations seeking to add analytics features to their own offerings can easily and directly embed the platform into their business applications or portals with white labeling and single sign-on options.


The following table sets forth certain operating highlights (in thousands)results for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2019 and 2015:2018, is included in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Business Overview

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product licenses

 

$

93,969

 

 

$

113,503

 

 

$

119,143

 

Subscription services

 

 

32,368

 

 

 

30,574

 

 

 

27,839

 

Total product licenses and subscription services

 

 

126,337

 

 

 

144,077

 

 

 

146,982

 

Product support

 

 

289,174

 

 

 

285,079

 

 

 

281,740

 

Other services

 

 

89,032

 

 

 

83,005

 

 

 

101,147

 

Total revenues

 

 

504,543

 

 

 

512,161

 

 

 

529,869

 

Cost of revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product licenses

 

 

7,176

 

 

 

8,573

 

 

 

8,118

 

Subscription services

 

 

13,435

 

 

 

12,765

 

 

 

13,051

 

Total product licenses and subscription services

 

 

20,611

 

 

 

21,338

 

 

 

21,169

 

Product support

 

 

17,481

 

 

 

15,001

 

 

 

12,748

 

Other services

 

 

58,557

 

 

 

56,808

 

 

 

67,191

 

Total cost of revenues

 

 

96,649

 

 

 

93,147

 

 

 

101,108

 

Gross profit

 

 

407,894

 

 

 

419,014

 

 

 

428,761

 

Operating expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

174,612

 

 

 

158,740

 

 

 

148,522

 

Research and development

 

 

78,766

 

 

 

73,142

 

 

 

65,206

 

General and administrative

 

 

80,161

 

 

 

79,462

 

 

 

80,732

 

Restructuring costs

 

 

0

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

279

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

333,539

 

 

 

311,389

 

 

 

294,739

 

Income from operations

 

$

74,355

 

 

$

107,625

 

 

$

134,022

 

MicroStrategy pursues two corporate strategies in the operation of its business. One strategy is to grow our enterprise analytics software business and the other strategy is to acquire and hold bitcoin. 

We are a global leader in enterprise analytics software and services. Our vision is to enable Intelligence Everywhere. The MicroStrategy platform brings together data from our customers’ enterprise applications, such as their financial systems, human resources systems, and supply chain and customer relationship management tools, to provide analytics for actionable insights.  Customers can also use our consulting and education offerings to harness MicroStrategy’s innovative technology and empower their workforce to make better decisions.

Our customers include leading companies from a wide range of industries, including retail, consulting, technology, manufacturing, banking, insurance, finance, healthcare, telecommunications, as well as the public sector.

 

The analytics market is highly competitive and our results of operations depend on our ability to market and sell offerings that provide customers with greater value than those offered by our competitors.competitive. Our future success depends on the effectiveness with which we can differentiate our productsofferings from boththose offered by large software vendors that provide products across multiple lines of business, including one or more products that directly compete with our products,offerings, and other potential competitors across analytics vendors across large, mid-sized, and small opportunities.  Aimplementation projects of varying sizes. We believe a key differentiator of MicroStrategy is our modern, open, comprehensive enterprise platform that can be extended to other tools and systems, can scale across the enterprise, is optimized for cloud or on-premises deployments, and can be combined with unique packages of our expert services and education offerings.

In 2021, we determined also to pursue as part of our overall business strategy, a strategy of investing our liquid assets that exceed working capital requirements in bitcoin, and we may from time to time, subject to market conditions, issue debt or equity securities in capital raising transactions with the objective of using the proceeds to purchase bitcoin.    We believe that our bitcoin strategy is complementary to our analytics software and services business, as we believe distinguishesthat our offerings is that we offer a single platform with comprehensivebitcoin and related activities in support of the bitcoin network enhance awareness of our brand and can provide opportunities to secure new customers for our analytics that supports both the needs of IT and business users, by delivering easy-to-use data discovery combined with enterprise governance.

Organizations recently have sought,offerings. We are also exploring opportunities to apply bitcoin related technologies such as blockchain analytics into our software offerings.  We view our bitcoin holdings as long-term holdings and we expectdo not plan to engage in regular trading of bitcoin or to hedge or otherwise enter into derivative contracts with respect to our bitcoin holdings, though we may sell bitcoin in future periods as needed to generate cash for treasury management and other general corporate purposes. As of February 8, 2021, the Company holds approximately 71,079 bitcoin that were acquired at an aggregate purchase price of $1.145 billion and an average purchase price of approximately $16,109 per bitcoin, inclusive of fees and expenses.


Impact of COVID-19 on Our Software Strategy

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted, and is likely to continue to result, in significant economic disruption. It has already disrupted global travel and supply chains and adversely impacted global commercial activity. Considerable uncertainty still surrounds COVID-19 and its potential long-term economic effects, as well as the effectiveness of any responses taken by government authorities and businesses. The travel restrictions, limits on hours of operations and/or closures of non-essential businesses, and other efforts to curb the spread of COVID-19 have significantly disrupted business activity globally.

Significant uncertainty exists concerning the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our customers’ and prospects’ business and operations in future periods. Although our product licenses revenues were not materially impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic during the year ended December 31, 2020, we believe our product licenses revenues may be negatively impacted in future periods until the effects of the pandemic have subsided due to a general increase in the time it takes to close deals in the current depressed macroeconomic environment.  Although we continued to see high renewal rates in our product support services during the year ended December 31, 2020, we believe our product support revenues may be negatively impacted in future periods by the overall depressed macroeconomic environment and to the extent that customers require extended payment terms or determine not to renew their product support arrangements as part of their efforts to reduce expenses.  Similarly, we may experience declines in our consulting revenues in future periods due to the overall depressed macroeconomic environment and as our customers continue to operate in remote work environments and aim to reduce expenses. The uncertainty related to COVID-19 may also result in increased volatility in the financial projections we use as the basis for estimates and assumptions used in our financial statements.

We are also continuing to adapt our operations to meet the challenges of this uncertain and rapidly evolving situation, including establishing remote working arrangements for our employees, limiting non-essential business travel, and cancelling or shifting our customer, employee, and industry events to a virtual-only format for the foreseeable future. Our sales and marketing expenses decreased significantly during the year ended December 31, 2020, as we adapted to the challenges of selling in the current depressed macroeconomic environment, adopted virtual sales and marketing practices, and streamlined our team to sell in this new environment.

We have received, and may continue to seek,receive, government assistance from various relief packages available in countries where we operate.   For example, in the United States, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) was enacted on March 27, 2020 to standardize theirprovide broad-based economic relief to various analytics applications aroundsectors of the U.S. economy through a single software platform.  This trend presents both opportunitiesvariety of means, including payroll and challenges for our business.  It offersincome tax deferrals and employee retention credits.In the Asia Pacific region, government assistance provided to us has primarily been in the opportunity to increase the sizeform of transactions with new customers and to expand the sizeemployer payroll tax exemptions. We have deferred payment of $4.6 million of our analytics installations with existing customers.  On the other hand, it presents the challenge that we may not be able to penetrate accounts that a competitor has penetrated or inemployer portion of U.S. social security taxes accrued through December 31, 2020, half of which a competitor is the incumbent analytics provider.

In addition, there is increased market demand for analysis of a wider variety of data sources, including sensor data, social data, web log data, and other data types. These new data sources are driving massive increases in the volume of data that can potentially be analyzed (these large-scale data sets are known as “Big Data”), which in turn is accelerating development of new storage technologies like Hadoop and NoSQL databases. The demand for analytics on Big Data represents an opportunity for us, as it opens up new potential applications and use cases for our technology. It also creates a challenge as we will need to continually enhance our technology to support emerging data sources, deliver faster performance necessary to support analysis of Big Data, and support analysis of a wider variety of data types, such as unstructured, semi-structured, and streaming data.


The market for enterprise mobility apps is rapidly changing, highly competitive, and complex with many competitors and different offerings ranging from fully custom-coded applications to plug-and-play solutions.  While organizations vary greatly in their approach to, and pace of adoption of, mobile solutions, they are increasingly accelerating the transition of their businesses onto mobile devices, such as tablets and smartphones.  Over the next few years, we expect to pay by December 31, 2021 and the remainder by December 31, 2022. Where taxes payable to government entities have been deferred to a later date, no reduction of expenses has been recorded.

Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic that organizationsmay negatively impact our business in future periods include, but are not limited to: limitations on the ability of our customers to conduct their business, purchase our products and services, and make timely payments; curtailed consumer spending; deferred purchasing decisions; delayed consulting services implementations; and decreases in product licenses revenues driven by channel partners.  We will continue to construct their informationactively monitor the nature and systems to take advantageextent of the efficienciesimpact to our business, operating results, and cost savingsfinancial condition.

Treasury Reserve Policy and Bitcoin Acquisition Strategy

In September 2020, our Board of mobile computing.  Ultimately, we expectDirectors adopted a Treasury Reserve Policy (as amended to date, the “Treasury Reserve Policy”) that the majority of routine business tasksupdated our treasury management and workflowscapital allocation strategies, under which our treasury reserve assets will become available as mobile-optimized touch-enabled apps.

We have undertaken multiple initiatives to address these opportunities and challenges, including:consist of:

introducing Dossier, a new way to consume analytics on MicroStrategy 10 using an interactive book of reports and dashboards that combines relevant analytics into a single place, with a new streamlined interface that goes beyond reports and dashboards and brings key data into a format that users can understand and use to make better, actionable decisions and identify new opportunities (available on MicroStrategy Web and tablets via native apps for both iOS and Android);

cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments (“Cash Assets”) held by us that exceed working capital requirements;and

releasing MicroStrategy on AWS, which allows customers to spin up their own instance of the full MicroStrategy platform in the cloud, and expanding support for MicroStrategy on AWS in more locations (such as London, Sydney, Frankfurt, Tokyo, Ireland, Ohio, Oregon, and Northern Virginia) and in nine different languages (English, French, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish, Dutch, Japanese, Korean, and Chinese);

improving access to MicroStrategy 10 via easy-to-access trial and evaluation versions of products on our website, including a free 30-day trial to MicroStrategy on AWS that lets prospects experience our enterprise capabilities and allows existing customers to try new features;

making our MicroStrategy Desktop product freely available to new and existing users, which helps to (i) increase public awareness, (ii) increase the adoption of the product into existing accounts by empowering MicroStrategy Web users to seamlessly connect MicroStrategy Desktop to their existing projects, upload and download reports and dashboards from the server, work offline, and try new functionality such as data blending and wrangling, and (iii) generate upsell opportunities for us by seeding the need for bigger enterprise capabilities like pixel-perfect dashboards, automated distribution, governance and security, all of which are available with our platform;

offering new collaboration tools that allow more users to interact and collaborate on analytics content, which can ultimately drive adoption to more users across the enterprise; and


delivering new out-of-the-box connectors that help analysts visualize log files

bitcoin held by us, with bitcoin serving as the primary treasury reserve asset on an ongoing basis, subject to market conditions and semi-structured data, such as Solr, Box, One Drive, Elasticsearch and others, introducing greater flexibility to visualize and interact with multi-level or ragged hierarchy reports against MDX (Multidimensional Expressions) sources such as Essbase and MSAS, and delivering enhancements such as dynamic filtering and supportanticipated needs of the business for derived attributes and metrics.Cash Assets.

As part of these treasury management and capital allocation strategies, we purchased a total of approximately 70,469 bitcoins at an aggregate purchase price of approximately $1.125 billion in 2020 for an average purchase price of approximately $15,964 per bitcoin, inclusive of fees and expenses. These purchases included purchases of bitcoin using the net proceeds of issuance of $650.0 million aggregate principal amount of 0.750% Convertible Senior Notes due 2025 in the fourth quarter of 2020.

At December 31, 2020, we carried $1.054 billion of digital assets on our balance sheet, consisting of the approximately 70,469 bitcoins and reflecting $70.7 million in cumulative impairment losses attributable to bitcoin trading price fluctuations, and held $59.7 million in cash and cash equivalents, compared to no digital assets and $456.7 million in cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2019, reflecting the shift in our liquid asset holdings following the adoption of our effortsnew Treasury Reserve Policy. Digital asset impairment losses of $70.7 million incurred in 2020 represented 17.5% of our operating expenses for the year, compared to take greater advantageno digital asset impairment losses for 2019, contributing to our net loss of $7.5 million for 2020 compared to net income of $34.4 million in 2019.

In 2021, we determined to adopt, in addition to and in conjunction with our Treasury Reserve Policy, a business strategy of purchasing bitcoin, and we may from time to time, subject to market conditions, issue debt or equity securities in capital raising transactions with the opportunitiesobjective of using the proceeds to purchase bitcoin.  We view our bitcoin holdings as long-term holdings and we do not plan to engage in the market and growregular trading of bitcoin or to hedge or otherwise enter into derivative contracts with respect to our market share,bitcoin holdings, though we expect to increase our sales and marketing expenditures and increase our research and development expenditures as we invest in our technology products and personnelmay sell bitcoins in future periods.periods as needed to generate cash for treasury management and other general corporate purposes.

As discussed in Note 11, Share-based Compensation, to the Consolidated Financial Statements,of February 8, 2021, we have outstanding stock options toheld approximately 71,079 bitcoins that were acquired at an aggregate purchase sharesprice of our class A common stock under our 2013 Equity Plan.  Share-based compensation expense$1.145 billion and an average purchase price of approximately $16,109 per bitcoin, inclusive of fees and expenses.


Operating Highlights

The following table sets forth certain operating highlights (in thousands) from these stock option awards was recognized in the following operating expense line items in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the periods indicated:years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product licenses

 

$

86,743

 

 

$

87,471

 

Subscription services

 

 

33,082

 

 

 

29,394

 

Total product licenses and subscription services

 

 

119,825

 

 

 

116,865

 

Product support

 

 

284,434

 

 

 

292,035

 

Other services

 

 

76,476

 

 

 

77,427

 

Total revenues

 

 

480,735

 

 

 

486,327

 

Cost of revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product licenses

 

 

2,293

 

 

 

2,131

 

Subscription services

 

 

14,833

 

 

 

15,161

 

Total product licenses and subscription services

 

 

17,126

 

 

 

17,292

 

Product support

 

 

23,977

 

 

 

28,317

 

Other services

 

 

49,952

 

 

 

54,365

 

Total cost of revenues

 

 

91,055

 

 

 

99,974

 

Gross profit

 

 

389,680

 

 

 

386,353

 

Operating expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales and marketing

 

$

2,294

 

 

$

2,971

 

 

$

2,842

 

 

 

148,910

 

 

 

191,235

 

Research and development

 

 

1,650

 

 

 

1,000

 

 

 

1,112

 

 

 

103,561

 

 

 

109,423

 

General and administrative

 

 

10,323

 

 

 

7,846

 

 

 

13,345

 

 

 

80,136

 

 

 

86,697

 

Total share-based compensation expense

 

$

14,267

 

 

$

11,817

 

 

$

17,299

 

Digital asset impairment losses

 

 

70,698

 

 

 

0

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

403,305

 

 

 

387,355

 

Loss from operations

 

$

(13,625

)

 

$

(1,002

)

 


As of December 31, 2017, we estimated that approximately $19.8 million of additional share-based compensation expense for options granted under the 2013 Equity Plan will be recognized over a remaining weighted average period of 2.3 years.  

We base our internal operating expense forecasts on expected revenue trends and strategic objectives.  Many of our expenses, such as office leases and certain personnel costs, are relatively fixed.  Accordingly, any shortfall in revenue may cause significant variation in our operating results.  In addition, we have incurred and may continue to incur significant impairment losses on our digital assets and we may recognize gains upon sale of our digital assets in the future, which would be presented net of any impairment losses within operating expenses.  We therefore believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results may not be a good indication of our future performance.


Share-based Compensation Expense

As discussed in Note 12, Share-based Compensation, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we have outstanding stock options to purchase shares of our class A common stock, restricted stock units, and certain other stock-based awards under our 2013 Equity Plan.  Share-based compensation expense (in thousands) from these awards was recognized in the following cost of revenues and operating expense line items in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the periods indicated:

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Cost of subscription services revenues

 

$

75

 

 

$

7

 

Cost of product support revenues

 

 

155

 

 

 

331

 

Cost of consulting revenues

 

 

23

 

 

 

198

 

Cost of education revenues

 

 

202

 

 

 

20

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

1,609

 

 

 

1,943

 

Research and development

 

 

2,740

 

 

 

2,460

 

General and administrative

 

 

6,349

 

 

 

5,250

 

Total share-based compensation expense

 

$

11,153

 

 

$

10,209

 

As of December 31, 2020, we estimated that approximately $36.6 million of additional share-based compensation expense for awards granted under the 2013 Equity Plan will be recognized over a remaining weighted average period of 3.1 years.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We are providing supplemental financial measures for (i) non-GAAP income from operations that excludes the impact of our share-based compensation arrangementsexpense and restructuring activities,impairment losses and forgains on sale from intangible assets, which include our digital assets, (ii) non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share that exclude the impact of our share-based compensation expense, impairment losses and gains on sale from intangible assets, which include our digital assets and the Domain Name Sale in the second quarter of 2019, interest expense arising from the Tax Act.amortization of the debt discount and issuance costs on our convertible senior notes, and related income tax effects, and (iii) certain non-GAAP constant currency revenues, cost of revenues, and operating expenses that exclude foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. These supplemental financial measures are not measurements of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) and, as a result, these supplemental financial measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.  Management uses these non-GAAP financial measures internally to help understand, manage, and evaluate our business performance and to help make operating decisions.

We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures are also useful to investors and analysts in comparing our performance across reporting periods on a consistent basis because in the case of thebasis.  The first supplemental financial measure for income from continuing operations, it excludes (i) a significant non-cash expense that we believe is not reflective of our general business performance, and restructuring charges that we believe are not reflective of ongoing operating results, and infor which the  case of the supplemental measures for net income and diluted earnings per share, they exclude one-time tax charges resulting from the Tax Act.  In addition, accounting for share-based compensation arrangements requires significant management judgment and the resulting share-based compensation expense could vary significantly in comparison to other companies.  Therefore,companies and (ii) significant impairment losses and gains on sale from intangible assets, which include our bitcoin.  The second set of supplemental financial measures excludes the impact of (i) share-based compensation expense, (ii) impairment losses and gains on sale from intangible assets, which include our bitcoin and the Domain Name Sale, which was outside of our normal business operations, (iii) non-cash interest expense arising from the amortization of the debt discount and issuance costs related to our convertible senior notes, and (iv) related income tax effects.  Although the portion of non-cash interest expense related to the amortization of the debt discount will be eliminated upon our planned adoption of ASU 2020-06 on January 1, 2021, excluding the current year non-cash interest expense related to both the amortization of the debt discount and the issuance costs will allow for greater comparability of our results after we adopt the new accounting rules.  The third set of supplemental financial measures excludes changes resulting from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates so that results may be compared to the same period in the prior year on a non-GAAP constant currency basis.  We believe the use of these non-GAAP financial measures can also facilitate comparison of our operating results to those of our competitors.


Non-GAAP financial measures are subject to material limitations as they are not in accordance with, or a substitute for, measurements prepared in accordance with GAAP.  For example, we expect that share-based compensation expense, which is excluded from ourthe first two non-GAAP financial measure,measures, will continue to be a significant recurring expense over the coming years and is an important part of the compensation provided to certain employees, officers, and directors.  Similarly, we expect that the portion of interest expense arising from the amortization of debt issuance costs will continue to be a recurring expense over the term of the convertible senior notes, even after our planned adoption of ASU 2020-06 on January 1, 2021.  We have also excluded impairment losses and gains on sale from intangible assets from the first two non-GAAP financial measures, either of which may occur in future periods as a result of our continued holdings of significant amounts of bitcoin.  Our non-GAAP financial measures are not meant to be considered in isolation and should be read only in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP.  We rely primarily on such Consolidated Financial Statements to understand, manage, and evaluate our business performance and use the non-GAAP financial measures only supplementally.


The following is a reconciliation of our non-GAAP financialincome from operations, which excludes the impact of (i) share-based compensation expense and (ii) impairment losses and gains on sale from intangible assets, which include our digital assets, to its most directly comparable GAAP measures (in thousands) for the periods indicated:

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Reconciliation of non-GAAP income from operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from operations

 

$

(13,625

)

 

$

(1,002

)

Share-based compensation expense

 

 

11,153

 

 

 

10,209

 

Digital asset impairment losses

 

 

70,698

 

 

 

0

 

Non-GAAP income from operations

 

$

68,226

 

 

$

9,207

 


The following are reconciliations of our non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share, in each case excluding the impact of (i) share-based compensation expense, (ii) impairment losses and gains on sale from intangible assets, which include our digital assets and the Domain Name Sale in 2019, (iii) interest expense arising from the amortization of the debt discount and issuance costs on our convertible senior notes, and (iv) related income tax effects to their most directly comparable GAAP measures (in thousands, except per share data) for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Reconciliation of non-GAAP income from operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations

 

$

74,355

 

 

$

107,625

 

 

$

134,022

 

Share-based compensation expense

 

 

14,267

 

 

 

11,817

 

 

 

17,299

 

Restructuring costs

 

 

0

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

279

 

Non-GAAP income from operations

 

$

88,622

 

 

$

119,487

 

 

$

151,600

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reconciliation of non-GAAP net income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

17,643

 

 

$

90,908

 

 

$

105,931

 

Tax charge due to the U.S. corporate tax reform legislation

 

 

44,018

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Non-GAAP net income

 

$

61,661

 

 

$

90,908

 

 

$

105,931

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reconciliation of non-GAAP diluted earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share

 

$

1.53

 

 

$

7.89

 

 

$

9.18

 

Impact of tax charge due to the U.S. corporate tax reform legislation (per diluted share)

 

 

3.81

 

 

 

0.00

 

 

 

0.00

 

Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share

 

$

5.34

 

 

$

7.89

 

 

$

9.18

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Reconciliation of non-GAAP net income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(7,524

)

 

$

34,355

 

Share-based compensation expense

 

 

11,153

 

 

 

10,209

 

Digital asset impairment losses

 

 

70,698

 

 

 

0

 

Gain from Domain Name Sale

 

 

0

 

 

 

(29,829

)

Interest expense arising from amortization of debt discount and issuance costs

 

 

1,543

 

 

 

0

 

Income tax effects (1)

 

 

(25,841

)

 

 

7,450

 

Non-GAAP net income

 

$

50,029

 

 

$

22,185

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reconciliation of non-GAAP diluted earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted (loss) earnings per share

 

$

(0.78

)

 

$

3.33

 

Share-based compensation expense (per diluted share)

 

 

1.15

 

 

 

0.99

 

Digital asset impairment losses (per diluted share)

 

 

7.31

 

 

 

0.00

 

Gain from Domain Name Sale (per diluted share)

 

 

0.00

 

 

 

(2.89

)

Interest expense arising from amortization of debt discount and issuance costs (per diluted share)

 

 

0.16

 

 

 

0.00

 

Income tax effects (per diluted share)

 

 

(2.67

)

 

 

0.72

 

Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share

 

$

5.17

 

 

$

2.15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) Income tax effects reflect the net tax effects of stock-based compensation expense, digital asset impairment losses, gain from the Domain Name Sale, and interest expense for amortization of debt discount and issuance costs.

 


The following are reconciliations of certain non-GAAP constant currency revenues, cost of revenues, and operating expenses to their most directly comparable GAAP measures (in thousands) for the periods indicated.

 

 

Years Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

GAAP

 

 

Foreign Currency

Exchange Rate

Impact (1)

 

 

Non-GAAP

Constant

Currency (2)

 

 

GAAP

 

 

GAAP %

Change

 

 

Non-GAAP

Constant

Currency %

Change (3)

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2020

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2020

 

 

2020

 

Product licenses revenues

 

$

86,743

 

 

$

(1,227

)

 

$

87,970

 

 

$

87,471

 

 

 

-0.8

%

 

 

0.6

%

Subscription services revenues

 

 

33,082

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

32,961

 

 

 

29,394

 

 

 

12.5

%

 

 

12.1

%

Product support revenues

 

 

284,434

 

 

 

(358

)

 

 

284,792

 

 

 

292,035

 

 

 

-2.6

%

 

 

-2.5

%

Other services revenues

 

 

76,476

 

 

 

304

 

 

 

76,172

 

 

 

77,427

 

 

 

-1.2

%

 

 

-1.6

%

Cost of product support revenues

 

 

23,977

 

 

 

(142

)

 

 

24,119

 

 

 

28,317

 

 

 

-15.3

%

 

 

-14.8

%

Cost of other services revenues

 

 

49,952

 

 

 

(347

)

 

 

50,299

 

 

 

54,365

 

 

 

-8.1

%

 

 

-7.5

%

Sales and marketing expenses

 

 

148,910

 

 

 

(2,184

)

 

 

151,094

 

 

 

191,235

 

 

 

-22.1

%

 

 

-21.0

%

Research and development expenses

 

 

103,561

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

103,519

 

 

 

109,423

 

 

 

-5.4

%

 

 

-5.4

%

General and administrative expenses

 

 

80,136

 

 

 

(444

)

 

 

80,580

 

 

 

86,697

 

 

 

-7.6

%

 

 

-7.1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GAAP

 

 

Foreign Currency

Exchange Rate

Impact (1)

 

 

Non-GAAP

Constant

Currency (2)

 

 

GAAP

 

 

GAAP %

Change

 

 

Non-GAAP

Constant

Currency %

Change (3)

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2019

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2019

 

 

2019

 

Product licenses revenues

 

$

87,471

 

 

$

(3,642

)

 

$

91,113

 

 

$

88,057

 

 

 

-0.7

%

 

 

3.5

%

Subscription services revenues

 

 

29,394

 

 

 

(333

)

 

 

29,727

 

 

 

29,570

 

 

 

-0.6

%

 

 

0.5

%

Product support revenues

 

 

292,035

 

 

 

(7,110

)

 

 

299,145

 

 

 

296,216

 

 

 

-1.4

%

 

 

1.0

%

Other services revenues

 

 

77,427

 

 

 

(2,091

)

 

 

79,518

 

 

 

83,795

 

 

 

-7.6

%

 

 

-5.1

%

Cost of product support revenues

 

 

28,317

 

 

 

(479

)

 

 

28,796

 

 

 

20,242

 

 

 

39.9

%

 

 

42.3

%

Cost of other services revenues

 

 

54,365

 

 

 

(1,834

)

 

 

56,199

 

 

 

60,773

 

 

 

-10.5

%

 

 

-7.5

%

Sales and marketing expenses

 

 

191,235

 

 

 

(5,169

)

 

 

196,404

 

 

 

205,525

 

 

 

-7.0

%

 

 

-4.4

%

Research and development expenses

 

 

109,423

 

 

 

(1,143

)

 

 

110,566

 

 

 

102,499

 

 

 

6.8

%

 

 

7.9

%

General and administrative expenses

 

 

86,697

 

 

 

(1,029

)

 

 

87,726

 

 

 

86,134

 

 

 

0.7

%

 

 

1.8

%

(1)

The “Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Impact” reflects the estimated impact from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates on international components of our Consolidated Statements of Operations.  It shows the increase (decrease) in material international revenues or expenses, as applicable, from the same period in the prior year, based on comparisons to the prior year quarterly average foreign currency exchange rates. The term “international” refers to operations outside of the United States and Canada.


(2)

The “Non-GAAP Constant Currency” reflects the current period GAAP amount, less the Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Impact.

(3)

The “Non-GAAP Constant Currency % Change” reflects the percentage change between the current period Non-GAAP Constant Currency amount and the GAAP amount for the same period in the prior year.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP.

The preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, and equity, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  In particular,These estimates, particularly estimates relating to our convertible senior notes and revenue recognition, have a material impact on our financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.  Actual results and outcomes could differ from these estimates and assumptions.

Revenue Recognition. Under existing revenue recognition guidance applicableConvertible Debt Arrangement

As discussed in Note 9, Convertible Senior Notes, to the financial statements set forthConsolidated Financial Statements, we issued convertible senior notes in this Annual ReportDecember 2020.  As the notes contain conversion features, we must separate the debt and equity components of the notes. The carrying amount of the liability component is determined by measuring the fair value of a similar debt instrument without any associated conversion features at the time of issuance and the carrying amount of the equity component is determined by deducting the fair value of the liability component from the initial proceeds of the notes. We also allocate issuance costs associated with the offering between debt and equity based on Form 10-K,their relative carrying values at the time of issuance. Such issuance costs are taken as a direct reduction to the debt and equity components.  Both the difference between the principal and the liability component’s initial carrying value and the issuance costs allocated to the debt component are amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the expected term of the notes.

In determining the fair value of a similar debt instrument without any associated conversion features, we estimated a nonconvertible debt borrowing rate at the time of issuance using a blend of different methodologies, which considered Level 2 inputs such as observable market prices of our debt and class A common stock, our historical and implied class A common stock volatility, a synthetic credit rating consistent with that utilized for determining the incremental borrowing rate for our accounting of leasing arrangements, and analysis of similar convertible debt issuances and their equivalent nonconvertible debt yields.  

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue from sales of software licenses to end users upon:using a five-step model:

 

1)(i)

persuasive evidence of an arrangement, as provided by agreements, contracts, purchase orders or other arrangements, generally executed by both parties;Identifying the contract(s) with a customer,

 

2)(ii)

existence of a fixed or determinable fee;Identifying the performance obligation(s),

 

3)(iii)

delivery ofDetermining the software; andtransaction price,

 

4)(iv)

determination that collection is reasonably assured.Allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and

(v)

Recognizing revenue when, or as, we satisfy a performance obligation.

WhenWe have elected to exclude taxes assessed by government authorities in determining the fees for software upgradestransaction price, and enhancements, technical support, consulting, and education are bundled with the license fee, they are unbundled for revenue recognition purposes using vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value of the elements.

Product support or post-contract support (“PCS”) revenue is derived from providing technical software support and software updates and upgrades to customers. PCStherefore revenue is recognized ratably overnet of taxes collected from customers.


Performance Obligations and Timing of Revenue Recognition

We primarily sell goods and services that fall into the termcategories discussed below. Each category contains one or more performance obligations that are either (i) capable of being distinct (i.e., the customer can benefit from the good or service on its own or together with readily available resources, including those purchased separately from us) and distinct within the context of the contract which in most cases is one year. Our VSOE for PCS, which includes updates, upgrades, and enhancements, is determined based on the optional stated renewal fee for PCS(i.e., separately identifiable from other promises in the contract,contract) or (ii) a series of distinct goods or services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer to the customer.  Aside from our term and perpetual product licenses, which are delivered at a point in time, the majority of our services are delivered over time.

Product Licenses

We sell different types of business intelligence software, licensed on a term or perpetual basis and installed either on premises or on a public cloud that is procured and managed by the customer.  Although product licenses are sold with product support, the software is fully functional at the outset of the arrangement and is considered a distinct performance obligation.  Revenue from product license sales is recognized when control of the license is transferred to the customer, which is the pricelater of delivery or commencement of the license term.  We may also sell through resellers and OEMs who purchase our software for resale.  In reseller arrangements, revenue is recognized when control of the license is transferred to the end user.  In OEM arrangements, revenue is recognized when control of the license is transferred to the OEM.

Subscription Services

We also sell access to our software through MCE, a cloud subscription service, wherein customers access the software through a cloud environment that we manage on behalf of the customer. Control of the software itself does not transfer to the customer under this arrangement and is not considered a separate performance obligation.  Cloud subscriptions are regularly sold on a standalone basis and include technical support, monitoring, backups, updates, and quarterly service reviews.  Revenue related to cloud subscriptions is recognized on a straight-line basis over the contract period, which is the period over which the customer has continuous access to the software.

Product Support

In all product license transactions, customers are required to pay when PCSpurchase a standard product support package and may also purchase a premium product support package for a fixed annual fee.  All product support packages include both technical support and when-and-if-available software upgrades, which are treated as a single performance obligation as they are considered a series of distinct services that are substantially the same and have the same duration and measure of progress.  Revenue from product support is renewed.  Additionally,recognized on a straight-line basis over the optional stated renewal fee usedcontract period, which is the period over which the customer has continuous access to establish VSOE for PCS inproduct support.

Consulting Services

We sell consulting services to help customers plan and execute deployment of our software.  Customers are not required to use consulting services to fully benefit from the software.  Consulting services are regularly sold on a softwarestandalone basis and either (i) prepaid upfront or (ii) sold on a time and materials basis.  Consulting arrangements are each considered separate performance obligations because they do not integrate with each other or with other offerings to deliver a combined output to the customer, do not modify or customize (or are not modified or customized by) each other or other offerings, and do not affect the customer’s ability to use the other consulting services or our other offerings.  Revenue under consulting arrangements is recognized over time as services are delivered.  For time and materials-based consulting arrangements, we have elected the practical expedient of recognizing revenue upon invoicing since the invoiced amount corresponds directly to the value of our service to date.  


transaction must be aboveEducation Services

We sell various education and training services to our minimum substantive VSOE rate for PCS.  Ifcustomers. Education services are sold on a stated renewal ratestandalone basis under two different types of arrangements: (i) annual subscriptions to live and on-demand training courses and (ii) custom courses purchased on an hourly basis.  Education arrangements are each considered separate performance obligations because they do not integrate with each other or with other offerings to deliver a combined output to the customer, do not modify or customize (or are not modified or customized by) each other or other offerings, and do not affect the customer’s ability to use the other education services or our other offerings. Revenue on annual subscriptions is considered non-substantive, VSOE of PCS has not been established, and we recognize all revenue under the arrangement ratablyrecognized on a straight-line basis over the PCS period.  A minimum substantive VSOE ratecontract period, which is determined basedthe period over which the customer has continuous access to the training courses. Revenue on an analysis of historical sales of PCS.  Forcustom courses are recognized on a renewal rate to be non-substantive, we believe it must be significantly lower than our minimum VSOE rate. We consider a 10% variance below our minimum VSOE rate to be significant. It is rare for us to have an arrangement that includes a renewal rate that is below the minimum VSOE rate.

Revenue from consulting, education,time and subscription services is recognizedmaterials basis as the services are performed.  Our VSOE for services other than PCS is determined based on an analysis of our historical sales of each element when sold separately from software.delivered.

For new offerings of services other than PCS or service offerings that have not had a sufficient history of sales activity, we initially establish VSOE based on the list price as determined by management with the relevant authority.  Each service offering has a single list price in each country where sold.

If VSOE exists for all undelivered elements and there is no such evidence of fair value established for delivered elements, the arrangement fee is first allocated to the elements where evidence of fair value has been established and the residual amount is allocated to the delivered elements. If evidence of fair value for any undelivered element of an arrangement does not exist, all revenue from the arrangement is deferred until such time that evidence of fair value exists for undelivered elements or until all elements of the arrangement are delivered, subject to certain limited exceptions.

If an arrangement includes acceptance criteria, revenue is not recognized until we can objectively demonstrate that the software or service can meet the acceptance criteria or the acceptance period lapses, whichever occurs earlier. If a software license arrangement obligates us to deliver specified future products or upgrades, revenue is recognized when the specified future product or upgrades are delivered or when the obligation to deliver specified future products expires, whichever occurs earlier. If a software license arrangement obligates us to deliver unspecified future products, then revenue is recognized on a subscription basis, ratably over the term of the contract.

License revenue derived from sales to resellers or OEMs who purchase our products for resale is recognized upon sufficient evidence that the products have been sold to the end user, provided all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.  Our standard software license and reseller agreements do not include any return rights other than the right to return non-conforming products for repair or replacement under our standard product warranties.  During the last three fiscal years, we have not experienced any product returns related to warranty claims.

We generally offer either commercial discounts or referral fees to our channel partners, depending on the nature of services performed. Revenue recognized from transactions with channel partners involved in resale or distribution activities is recorded net of any commercial discounts provided to them. Referral fees paid to channel partners not involved in resale or distribution activities are expensed as cost of revenues and, during the last three fiscal years, were not significant.

Our standard software license agreements do not include any price protection provisions.  However, transactions under our General Services Administration Federal Supply Schedule contract must comply with the Price Reductions clause.  In addition, certain government agencies have the right to cancel contracts for “convenience.”  During the last three fiscal years, there were no material amounts refunded under the Price Reductions clause and there were no material contracts cancelled for convenience.

Amounts collected prior to satisfying our revenue recognition criteria are included in net deferred revenue and advance payments in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Software revenue recognition requires judgment, including determinations about whether collectability is reasonably assured, the fee is fixed and determinable, a software arrangement includes multiple elements, and if so, whether VSOE exists for those elements.  Judgment is also required to assess whether future releases of certain software represent new products or upgrades and enhancements to existing products.


We also generate subscription services revenues primarily from our cloud services offerings.  Subscription services revenues include subscription fees from customers for access to the full breadth of MicroStrategy Analytics and MicroStrategy Mobile capabilities, database services, and data integration services.  Our standard arrangements with customers generally do not provide the customer with the right to take possession of the software supporting the cloud-based application service at any time.  As such, these arrangements are considered service contracts and revenue is recognized ratably over the service period of the contract, following completion of the set-up service.  Any related set-up service fees are recognized ratably over the longer of the contract period or the estimated average life of the customer relationship. 

Our subscription services are generally offered as standalone arrangements or as part of arrangements that include professional services.  If deliverables in a multiple-element arrangement have standalone value upon delivery, we account for each such deliverable separately.  We have concluded that our subscription services and our professional services each have standalone value.  When we enter into multiple-element arrangements that include subscription services and professional services, the total arrangement consideration is allocated to each of the deliverables based on the relative selling price hierarchy.  We determine the relative selling price for each deliverable using VSOE of selling price, if available, or our best estimate of selling price (“BESP”), if VSOE is not available.  We have determined that third-party evidence of selling price is not a practical alternative due to differences in our services offerings as compared to other companies and the lack of availability of third-party pricing information.  For professional services, we have established VSOE because a consistent number of standalone sales of this deliverable have been priced within a reasonably narrow range.  For subscription services, we have not established VSOE because, among other factors, the offering is relatively new and our pricing model continues to evolve. Accordingly, we use BESP to determine the relative selling price of our subscription services.

We determine BESP by reviewing historical transactions and by considering the service’s pricing models and objectives that take into account factors such as gross margin, the size and volume of the transactions, perceived pricing sensitivity, and growth strategies.  The determination of BESP is made through consultation with, and approval by, our management team, taking into consideration our go-to-market strategy.  As our pricing and go-to-market strategies evolve, we may modify our pricing practices in the future, which could result in changes to the determination of VSOE and BESP.

Amounts, upon invoicing, are recorded in accounts receivable and either gross deferred revenue or revenue, depending on whether the applicable revenue recognition criteria have been met. 

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. The standard’s core principle is that an entity should recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  ASU 2014-09 defines a five-step process to implement this core principle.  In implementing this new principle, it is possible more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing revenue recognition guidance. We plan to adopt ASU 2014-09 with full retrospective adoption effective January 1, 2018. See Note 3, Recent Accounting Standards,16, Segment Information, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.information regarding total revenues by geographic region.


Impact of Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Fluctuations on Results of OperationsEstimates and Judgments

We conductmake estimates and judgments to allocate the transaction price based on an observable or estimated standalone selling price (“SSP”). We also make estimates and judgements with respect to capitalizing incremental costs to obtain a customer contract and determining the subsequent amortization period. These estimates and judgments are discussed further below.

Determining the Transaction Price

The transaction price includes both fixed and variable consideration. Variable consideration is included in the transaction price to the extent it is probable that a significant portionreversal will not occur.  The amount of our business in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the currency in which we report our Consolidated Financial Statements.  As currency rates change from quarter over quarter and year over year, our results of operations may be impacted.  The table below summarizes the impact (in thousands) of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates on certain components of our Consolidated Statements of Operations by showing the increase (decrease) in revenues or expenses, as applicable,variable consideration excluded from the prior year.  The term “international” refers to operations outside of the United States and Canada.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

International product licenses revenues

 

$

1,129

 

 

$

(1,588

)

 

$

(8,008

)

International subscription services revenues

 

 

(120

)

 

 

(325

)

 

 

(408

)

International product support revenues

 

 

1,089

 

 

 

(4,513

)

 

 

(19,606

)

International other services revenues

 

 

372

 

 

 

(1,113

)

 

 

(7,357

)

Cost of product support revenues

 

 

(41

)

 

 

(327

)

 

 

(543

)

Cost of other services revenues

 

 

664

 

 

 

(950

)

 

 

(6,420

)

Sales and marketing expenses

 

 

621

 

 

 

(2,021

)

 

 

(9,817

)

Research and development expenses

 

 

(220

)

 

 

(944

)

 

 

(218

)

General and administrative expenses

 

 

5

 

 

 

(1,396

)

 

 

(2,458

)

For example, if there had been no change to foreign currency exchange rates from 2016 to 2017, international product licenses revenues would have been $46.5 million rather than $47.6 milliontransaction price was not material for the yearyears ended December 31, 2017.  If there had2020 and 2019. Our estimates of variable consideration are also subject to subsequent true-up adjustments and may result in changes to our transaction prices.  Such true-up adjustments have not been no changeand are not expected to foreign currency exchange rates from 2016be material.  We have the following sources of variable consideration:

(i)

Performance penalties – Subscription services and product support arrangements generally contain performance response time guarantees. For subscription services arrangements, we estimate variable consideration using a portfolio approach because performance penalties are tied to standard up-time requirements.  For product support arrangements, we estimate variable consideration on a contract basis because such arrangements are customer-specific.  For both subscription services and product support arrangements, we use an expected value approach to estimate variable consideration based on historical business practices and current and future performance expectations to determine the likelihood of incurring penalties.

(ii)

Extended payment terms – Our standard payment terms are generally within 180 days of invoicing. If extended payment terms are granted to customers, those terms generally do not exceed one year. For contracts with extended payment terms, we estimate variable consideration on a contract basis because such estimates are customer-specific, and we use an expected value approach to analyze historical business experience on a customer-by-customer basis to determine the likelihood that extended payment terms lead to an implied price concession.

(iii)

Sales and usage-based royalties – Certain product license arrangements include sales or usage-based royalties, covering both product license and product support.  In these arrangements, we use an expected value approach to estimate and recognize revenue for royalty sales each period, utilizing historical data on a contract-by-contract basis.  True-up adjustments are recorded in subsequent periods when royalty reporting is received from the OEMs.  

We provide a standard software assurance warranty to 2017, international product support revenues would have been $113.8 million ratherrepair, replace, or refund software that does not perform in accordance with documentation. The standard software assurance warranty period is generally less than $114.9 millionone year.  Assurance warranty claims were not material for the yearyears ended December 31, 2017.2020 and 2019.


We do not adjust the transaction price for significant financing components where the time period between cash payment and performance is one year or less.  However, there are circumstances where the timing between cash payment and performance may exceed one year.  These circumstances generally involve prepaid multi-year product support and subscription services arrangements where the customer determines when the service is utilized (e.g., when to request on-call support services or when to use and access the software in the cloud).  In these circumstances, we have determined no significant financing component exists because the customer controls when to utilize the service and because there are significant business purposes behind the timing difference between payment and performance (e.g., maximizing profit in the case of product support services and ensuring collectability in the case of subscription services).

Allocating the Transaction Price Based on Standalone Selling Prices (SSP)

We allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation in a contract based on its relative SSP.  The SSP is the price, or estimated price, of the software or service when sold on a standalone basis at contract inception.  In circumstances where SSP is not directly observable, we estimate SSP using the following methodologies:

(i)

Product licenses – Product licenses are not sold on a standalone basis and pricing is highly variable.  We establish SSP of product licenses using a residual approach after first establishing the SSP of standard product support.  Standard product support is sold on a standalone basis within a narrow range of the stated net license fee, and because an economic relationship exists between product licenses and standard product support, we have concluded that the residual method to estimate SSP of product licenses sold on both a perpetual and term basis is a fair allocation of the transaction price.

(ii)

Subscription services – Given the highly variable selling price of subscription services, we establish the SSP of our subscription services arrangements using a similar residual approach after first establishing the SSP of consulting and education services to the extent they are included in the arrangement. We have concluded that the residual method to estimate SSP of our subscription services is a fair allocation of the transaction price.

(iii)

Standard product support – We establish SSP of standard product support as a percentage of the stated net license fee, given such pricing is consistent with our normal pricing practices and there exists sufficient history of customers renewing standard product support on a standalone basis at similar percentages.  Semi-annually, we track renewal rates negotiated when standard product support is initially sold with a perpetual license in order to determine the SSP of standard product support within each geographic region for the upcoming quarter. If the stated standard product support fee falls within the SSP range, the specific rate in the contract will be used to determine SSP. If the stated fee is above or below SSP, the highest or lowest end of the range, respectively, will generally be used to determine SSP of standard product support for perpetual licenses. For term licenses, we determine SSP of standard product support at the lower end of the SSP range used for perpetual licenses because the term licenses are time bound, resulting in a lower value placed on product support as compared to a perpetual license.

(iv)

Premium product support, consulting services, and education services – SSP of premium product support, consulting services, and education services is established by using a bell-shaped curve approach to define a narrow range within each geographic region in which the services are discounted off of the list price on a standalone basis.

We often provide options to purchase future offerings at a discount. We analyze the option price against the previously established SSP of the goods or services to determine if the options represent material rights that should be accounted for as separate performance obligations.  In general, an option sold at or above SSP is not considered a material right because the customer could have received that right without entering into the contract.  If there had been no change to foreign currency exchange rates from 2016 to 2017, salesa material right exists, revenue associated with the option is deferred and marketing expenses would have been $174.0 million rather than $174.6 million forrecognized when the yearfuture goods or services are transferred, or when the option expires. During the years ended December 31, 2017.2020 and 2019, separate performance obligations arising from future purchase options have not been material.

 


Incremental Costs to Obtain Customer Contracts

Incremental costs incurred to obtain contracts with customers include certain variable compensation (e.g., commissions and bonuses) paid to our sales team.  Although we may bundle our goods and services into one contract, commissions are individually determined on each distinct good or service in the contract.  We expense as incurred those amounts earned on consulting and education services, which are generally performed within a one-year period and primarily sold on a standalone basis. We also expense as incurred those amounts earned on product license sales, since the amount is earned when the license is delivered. We capitalize those amounts earned on initial-year product support and cloud subscriptions and amortize the costs over a period of time that is consistent with the pattern of transfer to the customer, which we have determined to be a period of three years. Although we typically sell product support and cloud subscriptions for a period of one year, a majority of customers renew their product support and cloud subscription arrangements.  Three years is generally the period after which platforms are no longer supported by our support team and when customers generally choose to upgrade their software platform.   We do not currently pay variable compensation on product support or cloud subscription renewals.

 

Results of Operations

Comparison of the years endedYears Ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020 and 20152019

Revenues

Except as otherwise indicated herein, the term “domestic” refers to operations in the United States and Canada and the term “international” refers to operations outside of the United States and Canada.

Product licenses and subscription services revenues.  The following table sets forth product licenses and subscription services revenues (in thousands) and related percentage changes for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

% Change

 

 

% Change

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

in 2017

 

 

in 2016

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

% Change

 

Product Licenses and Subscription Services Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product Licenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic

 

$

46,329

 

 

$

69,307

 

 

$

70,127

 

 

 

-33.2

%

 

 

-1.2

%

 

$

51,504

 

 

$

45,850

 

 

 

12.3

%

International

 

 

47,640

 

 

 

44,196

 

 

 

49,016

 

 

 

7.8

%

 

 

-9.8

%

 

 

35,239

 

 

 

41,621

 

 

 

-15.3

%

Total product licenses revenues

 

 

93,969

 

 

 

113,503

 

 

 

119,143

 

 

 

-17.2

%

 

 

-4.7

%

 

 

86,743

 

 

 

87,471

 

 

 

-0.8

%

Subscription Services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic

 

 

25,848

 

 

 

26,359

 

 

 

24,332

 

 

 

-1.9

%

 

 

8.3

%

 

 

24,684

 

 

 

21,453

 

 

 

15.1

%

International

 

 

6,520

 

 

 

4,215

 

 

 

3,507

 

 

 

54.7

%

 

 

20.2

%

 

 

8,398

 

 

 

7,941

 

 

 

5.8

%

Total subscription services revenues

 

 

32,368

 

 

 

30,574

 

 

 

27,839

 

 

 

5.9

%

 

 

9.8

%

 

 

33,082

 

 

 

29,394

 

 

 

12.5

%

Total product licenses and subscription services revenues

 

$

126,337

 

 

$

144,077

 

 

$

146,982

 

 

 

-12.3

%

 

 

-2.0

%

 

$

119,825

 

 

$

116,865

 

 

 

2.5

%


 


The following table sets forth a summary, grouped by size, of the number of recognized product licenses transactions for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Product Licenses Transactions with Recognized Licenses Revenue in the Applicable Period:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More than $1.0 million in licenses revenue recognized

 

 

10

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

10

 

Between $0.5 million and $1.0 million in licenses revenue recognized

 

 

17

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

17

 

Total

 

 

27

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

27

 

Domestic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More than $1.0 million in licenses revenue recognized

 

 

6

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

7

 

Between $0.5 million and $1.0 million in licenses revenue recognized

 

 

7

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

10

 

Total

 

 

13

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

17

 

International:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More than $1.0 million in licenses revenue recognized

 

 

4

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

3

 

Between $0.5 million and $1.0 million in licenses revenue recognized

 

 

10

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

7

 

Total

 

 

14

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

10

 



 

The following table sets forth the recognized revenue (in thousands) attributable to product licenses transactions, grouped by size, and related percentage changes for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

% Change

 

 

% Change

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

in 2017

 

 

in 2016

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

% Change

 

Product Licenses Revenue Recognized in the Applicable Period:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More than $1.0 million in licenses revenue recognized

 

$

12,860

 

 

$

22,963

 

 

$

25,462

 

 

 

-44.0

%

 

 

-9.8

%

 

$

25,599

 

 

$

13,830

 

 

 

85.1

%

Between $0.5 million and $1.0 million in licenses revenue recognized

 

 

11,478

 

 

 

14,317

 

 

 

23,296

 

 

 

-19.8

%

 

 

-38.5

%

 

 

12,096

 

 

 

11,233

 

 

 

7.7

%

Less than $0.5 million in licenses revenue recognized

 

 

69,631

 

 

 

76,223

 

 

 

70,385

 

 

 

-8.6

%

 

 

8.3

%

 

 

49,048

 

 

 

62,408

 

 

 

-21.4

%

Total

 

 

93,969

 

 

 

113,503

 

 

 

119,143

 

 

 

-17.2

%

 

 

-4.7

%

 

 

86,743

 

 

 

87,471

 

 

 

-0.8

%

Domestic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More than $1.0 million in licenses revenue recognized

 

 

7,824

 

 

 

19,314

 

 

 

20,350

 

 

 

-59.5

%

 

 

-5.1

%

 

 

20,108

 

 

 

8,707

 

 

 

130.9

%

Between $0.5 million and $1.0 million in licenses revenue recognized

 

 

4,846

 

 

 

8,627

 

 

 

12,503

 

 

 

-43.8

%

 

 

-31.0

%

 

 

6,568

 

 

 

6,908

 

 

 

-4.9

%

Less than $0.5 million in licenses revenue recognized

 

 

33,659

 

 

 

41,366

 

 

 

37,274

 

 

 

-18.6

%

 

 

11.0

%

 

 

24,828

 

 

 

30,235

 

 

 

-17.9

%

Total

 

 

46,329

 

 

 

69,307

 

 

 

70,127

 

 

 

-33.2

%

 

 

-1.2

%

 

 

51,504

 

 

 

45,850

 

 

 

12.3

%

International:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More than $1.0 million in licenses revenue recognized

 

 

5,036

 

 

 

3,649

 

 

 

5,112

 

 

 

38.0

%

 

 

-28.6

%

 

 

5,491

 

 

 

5,123

 

 

 

7.2

%

Between $0.5 million and $1.0 million in licenses revenue recognized

 

 

6,632

 

 

 

5,690

 

 

 

10,793

 

 

 

16.6

%

 

 

-47.3

%

 

 

5,528

 

 

 

4,325

 

 

 

27.8

%

Less than $0.5 million in licenses revenue recognized

 

 

35,972

 

 

 

34,857

 

 

 

33,111

 

 

 

3.2

%

 

 

5.3

%

 

 

24,220

 

 

 

32,173

 

 

 

-24.7

%

Total

 

$

47,640

 

 

$

44,196

 

 

$

49,016

 

 

 

7.8

%

 

 

-9.8

%

 

$

35,239

 

 

$

41,621

 

 

 

-15.3

%

 

Product licenses revenues decreased $19.5 million and $5.6$0.7 million during 2017 and 2016, respectively,2020, as compared to the prior year. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020 and 2015,2019, product licenses transactions with more than $0.5 million in recognized revenue represented 25.9%, 32.8%,43.5% and 40.9%28.7%, respectively, of our product licenses revenues.  During 2017,2020, our top three product licenses transactions totaled $4.5$15.3 million in recognized revenue, or 4.8%17.6% of total product licenses revenues, compared to $9.2$5.4 million, and $7.4 million, or 8.1% and 6.2% of total product licenses revenues, during 2016 and 2015, respectively.  2019. Although our product licenses revenues were not materially impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic during the year ended December 31, 2020, we believe our product licenses revenues may be negatively impacted in future periods until the effects of the pandemic have subsided due to a general increase in the time it takes to close deals in the current depressed macroeconomic environment.


Domestic product licenses revenues.  Domestic product licenses revenues decreased $23.0increased $5.7 million during 2017,2020, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to a decreasean increase in the number and average deal size of transactions with more than $1.0 million in recognized revenue, and a decrease in the number of transactions with less than $1.0 million in recognized revenue.

Domestic product licenses revenues decreased $0.8 million during 2016, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to a decrease in the number and average deal size of transactions with recognized revenue between $0.5 million and $1.0 million, and a decrease in the number of transactions with more than $1.0 million in recognized revenue, partially offset by an increasea decrease in the average deal size and the number of transactions with less than $0.5 million in recognized revenue.

International product licenses revenues.  International product licenses revenues increased $3.4 million during 2017, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to an increase in the number of transactions with more than $0.5 million in recognized revenue and a $1.1 million favorable foreign currency exchange impact.

International product licenses revenues decreased $4.8$6.4 million during 2016,2020, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to a decrease in the numberaverage deal size of transactions with less than $0.5 million in recognized revenue between $0.5 million and $1.0 million and a $1.6$1.2 million unfavorable foreign currency exchange impact, partially offset by an increase in the number of transactions with less thanrecognized revenue between $0.5 million in recognized revenue.and $1.0 million.

Subscription services revenues. Subscription services revenues are primarily derived from ourMCE, a cloud services offeringssubscription service, that are recognized on a subscription basisratably over the service period ofin the contract. Subscription services revenues increased $1.8 million and $2.7$3.7 million during 2017 and 2016, respectively,2020, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to new subscription services customers and an increase in the use of subscription services by existing customers and conversions to cloud-based subscriptions from existing on-premises customers.


Product support revenues.  The following table sets forth product support revenues (in thousands) and related percentage changes for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

% Change

 

 

% Change

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

in 2017

 

 

in 2016

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

% Change

 

Product Support Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic

 

$

174,316

 

 

$

172,695

 

 

$

171,832

 

 

 

0.9

%

 

 

0.5

%

 

$

167,266

 

 

$

172,124

 

 

 

-2.8

%

International

 

 

114,858

 

 

 

112,384

 

 

 

109,908

 

 

 

2.2

%

 

 

2.3

%

 

 

117,168

 

 

 

119,911

 

 

 

-2.3

%

Total product support revenues

 

$

289,174

 

 

$

285,079

 

 

$

281,740

 

 

 

1.4

%

 

 

1.2

%

 

$

284,434

 

 

$

292,035

 

 

 

-2.6

%

 

Product support revenues are derived from providing technical software support and software updates and upgrades to customers.  Product support revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the contract, which is generally one year.  Product support revenues increased $4.1decreased $7.6 million during 2017,2020, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to certain customers converting from perpetual product licenses to our subscription services or term product licenses offerings and a decrease in new product and premium support contracts and a $1.1 million favorable foreign currency exchange impact.  Productcontracts. Although our product support revenues increased $3.3 millionwere not materially impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic during 2016, as comparedthe year ended December 31, 2020, we believe our product support revenues may be negatively impacted in future periods by the overall depressed macroeconomic environment resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and to the prior year, primarily dueextent that customers require extended payment terms or determine not to newrenew their product and premium support contracts, partially offset by a $4.5 million unfavorable foreign currency exchange impact.arrangements as part of their efforts to reduce expenses.


Other services revenues.  The following table sets forth other services revenues (in thousands) and related percentage changes for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

% Change

 

 

% Change

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

in 2017

 

 

in 2016

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

% Change

 

Other Services Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consulting

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic

 

$

40,561

 

 

$

35,935

 

 

$

54,159

 

 

 

12.9

%

 

 

-33.6

%

 

$

33,021

 

 

$

29,779

 

 

 

10.9

%

International

 

 

39,257

 

 

 

37,465

 

 

 

37,906

 

 

 

4.8

%

 

 

-1.2

%

 

 

38,324

 

 

 

39,880

 

 

 

-3.9

%

Total consulting revenues

 

 

79,818

 

 

 

73,400

 

 

 

92,065

 

 

 

8.7

%

 

 

-20.3

%

 

 

71,345

 

 

 

69,659

 

 

 

2.4

%

Education

 

 

9,214

 

 

 

9,605

 

 

 

9,082

 

 

 

-4.1

%

 

 

5.8

%

 

 

5,131

 

 

 

7,768

 

 

 

-33.9

%

Total other services revenues

 

$

89,032

 

 

$

83,005

 

 

$

101,147

 

 

 

7.3

%

 

 

-17.9

%

 

$

76,476

 

 

$

77,427

 

 

 

-1.2

%

 

Consulting revenues.  Consulting revenues are derived from helping customers plan and execute the deployment of our software. Consulting revenues increased $6.4$1.7 million during 2017,2020, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to an increase in thebillable hours worldwide, partially offset by a decrease in average bill raterates and a $0.4 million favorable foreign currency exchange impact. Consulting revenues decreased $18.7 million during 2016, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to a decrease in billable hours worldwidetravel and a $1.0 million unfavorable foreign currency exchange impact, partially offsetentertainment expenditures. Although our consulting revenues were not materially impacted by an increasethe COVID-19 pandemic during the year ended December 31, 2020, we believe our consulting revenues may be negatively impacted in future periods by the average bill rate.overall depressed macroeconomic environment resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and as our customers continue to operate in remote work environments and aim to reduce expenses.

Education revenues.  Education revenues are derived from the education and training that we provide to our customers to enhance their ability to fully utilize the features and functionality of our software.  These offerings include self-tutorials, custom course development, joint training with customers’ internal staff, and standard course offerings, with pricing dependent on the specific offering delivered.  Education revenues decreased $0.4$2.6 million during 2017,2020, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to lower overall contract valuesa reduction in the average sales price of our education offerings and education offerings that we made available at no charge for a decreaselimited time period during the first half of 2020 in onsite course delivery.  Education revenues increased $0.5 million during 2016, as comparedresponse to the prior year, primarily due to higher overall contract values and an increase in onsite and online course delivery.COVID-19 pandemic.  


Costs and Expenses

Cost of revenues.  The following table sets forth cost of revenues (in thousands) and related percentage changes for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

% Change

 

 

% Change

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

in 2017

 

 

in 2016

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

% Change

 

Cost of Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product licenses and subscription services:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product licenses

 

$

7,176

 

 

$

8,573

 

 

$

8,118

 

 

 

-16.3

%

 

 

5.6

%

 

$

2,293

 

 

$

2,131

 

 

 

7.6

%

Subscription services

 

 

13,435

 

 

 

12,765

 

 

 

13,051

 

 

 

5.2

%

 

 

-2.2

%

 

 

14,833

 

 

 

15,161

 

 

 

-2.2

%

Total product licenses and subscription services

 

 

20,611

 

 

 

21,338

 

 

 

21,169

 

 

 

-3.4

%

 

 

0.8

%

 

 

17,126

 

 

 

17,292

 

 

 

-1.0

%

Product support

 

 

17,481

 

 

 

15,001

 

 

 

12,748

 

 

 

16.5

%

 

 

17.7

%

 

 

23,977

 

 

 

28,317

 

 

 

-15.3

%

Other services:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consulting

 

 

52,018

 

 

 

50,866

 

 

 

63,344

 

 

 

2.3

%

 

 

-19.7

%

 

 

42,923

 

 

 

47,664

 

 

 

-9.9

%

Education

 

 

6,539

 

 

 

5,942

 

 

 

3,847

 

 

 

10.0

%

 

 

54.5

%

 

 

7,029

 

 

 

6,701

 

 

 

4.9

%

Total other services

 

 

58,557

 

 

 

56,808

 

 

 

67,191

 

 

 

3.1

%

 

 

-15.5

%

 

 

49,952

 

 

 

54,365

 

 

 

-8.1

%

Total cost of revenues

 

$

96,649

 

 

$

93,147

 

 

$

101,108

 

 

 

3.8

%

 

 

-7.9

%

 

$

91,055

 

 

$

99,974

 

 

 

-8.9

%

 

Cost of product licenses revenues.  Cost of product licenses revenues consists of amortization of capitalized software development costs, referral fees paid to channel partners, the costs of product manuals and media, and royalties paid to third-party software vendors. Capitalized software development costs are generally amortized over a useful life of three years.


Cost of product licenses revenues decreased $1.4 milliondid not materially change during 2017,2020, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to a $1.4 million decrease in amortization of capitalized software development costs related to MicroStrategy 9.4, which became fully amortized in September 2016, and a $0.3 million decrease in referral fees related to channel partners. We expect to amortize the remaining balance of our products’ capitalized software development costs as of December 31, 2017 ratably over the applicable remaining amortization periods as follows:

 

 

Capitalized Software

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Development Costs, Net,

 

 

Remaining

 

 

 

as of December 31, 2017

 

 

Amortization Period

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

(in months)

 

MicroStrategy 10

 

 

2,499

 

 

 

5

 

Total capitalized software development costs, net

 

$

2,499

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of product licenses revenues increased $0.5 million during 2016, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to a $2.5 million increase in amortization of capitalized software development costs related to MicroStrategy 10, which was made generally available in June 2015, and a $0.2 million increase in referral fees related to channel partners, partially offset by a $1.9 million decrease in amortization of capitalized software development costs related to MicroStrategy 9.3, which became fully amortized in September 2015, and a $0.5 million decrease in amortization of capitalized software development costs related to MicroStrategy 9.4, which became fully amortized in September 2016.year.

Cost of subscription services revenues.  Cost of subscription services revenues consists of equipment, facility and other related support costs, and personnel and related overhead costs. Subscription services headcount decreased 29.0% to 49 at December 31, 2020 from 69 at December 31, 2019. Cost of subscription services revenues increased $0.7did not materially change during 2020, as compared to the prior year.

Cost of product support revenues.  Cost of product support revenues consists of personnel and related overhead costs, including those under our Enterprise Support program. Our Enterprise Support program utilizes primarily consulting personnel to provide product support to our customers at our discretion.  Compensation related to personnel providing Enterprise Support services is reported as cost of product support revenues.  Product support headcount decreased 29.7% to 154 at December 31, 2020 from 219 at December 31, 2019. Cost of product support revenues decreased $4.3 million during 2017,2020, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to a $1.9 million increase in third-party hosting service provider fees, partially offset by a $0.6 million decrease in compensation and related costs, and a $0.4 million decrease in equipment, facility, and other related support costs. Subscription services headcount increased 10.4% to 53 at December 31, 2017 from 48 at December 31, 2016.

Cost of subscription services revenues decreased $0.3 million during 2016, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to a $2.1 million decrease in equipment, facility, and other related support costs, a $0.3 million decrease in compensation and related costs, and a $0.3 million decrease in consulting and advisory costs, partially offset by a $2.3 million increase in third-party hosting service provider fees.  Subscription services headcount increased 29.7% to 48 at December 31, 2016 from 37 at December 31, 2015.

Cost of product support revenues.  Cost of product support revenues consists of product support personnel and related overhead costs.  Cost of product support revenues increased $2.5 million during 2017, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to a $2.4 million increase in compensation and related costs due to an increase in average staffing levels, a $0.2 million increase in travel and entertainment expenditures, and a $0.2 million increase in facility and other related support costs, partially offset by a $0.3 million decrease in subcontractor costs.  Product support headcount increased 0.6% to 172 at December 31, 2017 from 171 at December 31, 2016.

Cost of product support revenues increased $2.3 million during 2016, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to a $1.8 million increase in compensation and related costs due to an increase in staffing levels, a $0.3 million increase in subcontractor costs, and a $0.2 million increase in recruiting costs.  Product support headcount increased 30.5% to 171 at December 31, 2016 from 131 at December 31, 2015.

Cost of consulting revenues.  Cost of consulting revenues consists of personnel and related overhead costs.  Cost of consulting revenues increased $1.2 million during 2017, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to a $1.5 million increase in compensation and related costs and a $0.9 million increase in travel and entertainment expenditures, partially offset by a $1.4 million decrease in subcontractor costs.  Included in the above components is an aggregate $0.6 million unfavorable foreign currency exchange impact.  Consulting headcount decreased 2.6% to 441 at December 31, 2017 from 453 at December 31, 2016.


Cost of consulting revenues decreased $12.5 million during 2016, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to a $6.8$3.8 million decrease in compensation and related costs due to a decrease in averageproduct support staffing levels, a $3.7 million decrease in subcontractor costs, a $1.4 million decrease in travel and entertainment expenditures, a $1.1$0.7 million decrease in facility and other related support costs, and a $0.4 million decrease in travel and entertainment expenditures, partially offset by a $0.4$1.1 million increase in recruiting costs.  Included in the above components is an aggregate $0.9 million favorable foreign currency exchange impact.  Consulting headcount decreased 3.0%compensation and related costs attributable to 453 at December 31, 2016 from 467 at December 31, 2015.non-product support personnel providing increased Enterprise Support services.  

Cost of educationconsulting revenues.  Cost of educationconsulting revenues consists of personnel and related overhead costs.costs, excluding those under our Enterprise Support program which are allocated to cost of product support revenues.  Consulting headcount increased 0.3% to 393 at December 31, 2020 from 392 at December 31, 2019. Cost of educationconsulting revenues increased $0.6decreased $4.7 million during 2017,2020, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to a $0.7$5.1 million decrease in travel and entertainment expenditures as a result of restrictions placed on non-essential business travel during the COVID-19 pandemic and a $0.9 million decrease in compensation and related costs attributable to consulting personnel providing increased Enterprise Support services, partially offset by a $1.1 million increase in compensation and related costs due to an increase in average staffing levels and a $0.2$0.7 million increase in dues and subscriptions, partially offset by a $0.3 million decrease in facility and other related supportsubcontractor costs.  Education headcount increased 5.1% to 41 at December 31, 2017 from 39 at December 31, 2016.

Cost of education revenues.  Cost of education revenues increased $2.1 millionconsists of personnel and related overhead costs. Education headcount decreased 2.6% to 37 at December 31, 2020 from 38 at December 31, 2019. Cost of education revenues did not materially change during 2016,2020, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to a $0.9 million increase in compensation and related costs due to an increase in staffing levels, a $0.7 million increase in facility and other related support costs, and a $0.3 million increase in subcontractor costs. Education headcount increased 39.3% to 39 at December 31, 2016 from 28 at December 31, 2015.year.  


Sales and marketing expenses.  Sales and marketing expenses consist of personnel costs (excluding those under our Enterprise Support program which are allocated to cost of product support revenues), commissions, office facilities, travel, advertising, public relations programs, and promotional events, such as trade shows, seminars, and technical conferences. Sales and marketing headcount decreased 19.8% to 479 at December 31, 2020 from 597 at December 31, 2019. The following table sets forth sales and marketing expenses (in thousands) and related percentage changes for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

% Change

 

 

% Change

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

in 2017

 

 

in 2016

 

Sales and marketing expenses

 

$

174,612

 

 

$

158,740

 

 

$

148,522

 

 

 

10.0

%

 

 

6.9

%

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

% Change

 

Sales and marketing expenses

 

$

148,910

 

 

$

191,235

 

 

 

-22.1

%

 

Sales and marketing expenses increased $15.9decreased $42.3 million during 2017, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to an $8.4 million increase in marketing and advertising costs, a $4.4 million increase in compensation and related costs due to an increase in staffing levels, a $2.7 million increase in travel and entertainment expenditures, a $0.7 million increase in recruiting costs, and a $0.5 million increase in facility and other related support costs, partially offset by a $0.7 million net decrease in share-based compensation expense related primarily to the departure of an executive employee in the first quarter of 2017, and a $0.2 million decrease in consulting and advisory costs.  Included in the above components is an aggregate $0.6 million unfavorable foreign currency exchange impact.  Sales and marketing headcount increased 11.1% to 652 at December 31, 2017 from 587 at December 31, 2016. We expect to increase our sales and marketing expenses in future periods as described in the “Overview” section above.

As a result of the grant of stock options under the 2013 Equity Plan, we expect that share-based compensation expense, a portion of which is recognized as sales and marketing expense, will continue to be a significant recurring expense.  As of December 31, 2017, we estimated that approximately $6.6 million of additional share-based compensation expense will be recognized as sales and marketing expense over a remaining weighted average period of 2.8 years.  See “Overview” and Note 11, Share-based Compensation, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the 2013 Equity Plan and related share-based compensation expense.

Sales and marketing expenses increased $10.2 million during 2016,2020, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to a $4.5$10.2 million increasedecrease in variable compensation, and related costswhich includes the cancellation of a sales employee awards event as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, a $9.9 million decrease in employee salaries due to an increasea decrease in staffing levels, a $1.8an $8.7 million increasedecrease in marketing and advertising costs a $1.0as we transitioned from in-person to virtual marketing events, an $8.0 million increase in recruiting costs, a $0.9 million increasedecrease in travel and entertainment expenditures as a $0.9result of restrictions placed on non-essential business travel during the COVID-19 pandemic, a $2.7 million increasedecrease in facility and other related support costs, a $1.4 million decrease in subcontractor costs, a $1.0 million decrease in recruiting costs, and a $0.5 million decrease in compensation and related costs attributable to sales and marketing personnel providing increased Enterprise Support services. Included in sales and marketing expenses for 2020 is an aggregate $2.2 million favorable foreign currency exchange impact.

Research and development expenses.  Research and development expenses consist of the personnel costs for our software engineering personnel, depreciation of equipment, and other related costs. Research and development headcount decreased 13.6% to 642 at December 31, 2020 from 743 at December 31, 2019. The following table summarizes research and development expenses (in thousands) and related percentage changes for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

% Change

 

Research and development expenses

 

$

103,561

 

 

$

109,423

 

 

 

-5.4

%

Research and development expenses decreased $5.9 million during 2020, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to a $2.4 million decrease in compensation and related costs due to a decrease in staffing levels and certain COVID-19-related employer payroll tax exemptions in the Asia Pacific region, a $1.4 million decrease in recruiting costs, a $1.1 million decrease in facility and other related support costs (which includes an allocated portion of the gain on partial lease termination of our corporate headquarters lease during the fourth quarter of 2020), a $0.7 million increasedecrease in travel and entertainment expenditures as a result of restrictions placed on non-essential business travel during the COVID-19 pandemic, a $0.7 million decrease in consulting and advisory costs, and a $0.2$0.5 million decrease in employee relations expenses, partially offset by a $0.7 million increase in non-income taxes.  Included in the above components is an aggregate $2.0 million favorable foreign currency exchange impact.  Sales and marketing headcount increased 14.4% to 587 at December 31, 2016 from 513 at December 31, 2015.technology infrastructure costs.


General and administrative expenses.  General and administrative expenses consist of personnel and related overhead costs, and other costs of our executive, finance, human resources, information systems, and administrative departments, as well as third-party consulting, legal, and other professional fees. General and administrative headcount decreased 28.1% to 243 at December 31, 2020 from 338 at December 31, 2019. The following table sets forth general and administrative expenses (in thousands) and related percentage changes for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

% Change

 

 

% Change

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

in 2017

 

 

in 2016

 

General and administrative expenses

 

$

80,161

 

 

$

79,462

 

 

$

80,732

 

 

 

0.9

%

 

 

-1.6

%

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

% Change

 

General and administrative expenses

 

$

80,136

 

 

$

86,697

 

 

 

-7.6

%


 

General and administrative expenses increased $0.7decreased $6.6 million during 2017,2020, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to a $2.5$2.0 million net increasedecrease in share-based compensationbad debt expense, a $0.6$1.9 million increasedecrease in facility and other aircraft-related operatingrelated support costs (which includes an allocated portion of the gain on partial lease termination of our corporate headquarters lease during the fourth quarter of 2020), a $0.5$1.7 million increase in recruiting costs, and a $0.3 million increasedecrease in travel and entertainment expenditures partially offset byas a $1.9 million decrease in severance costs associated withresult of restrictions placed on non-essential business travel during the streamlining of our finance organization,COVID-19 pandemic, a $0.8$1.6 million decrease in compensation and related costs due to a decrease in staffing levels, a $0.4$1.0 million decrease in recruiting costs, a $0.9 million decrease in costs related to our corporate aircraft, and a $0.5 million decrease in employee relations expenses, partially offset by a $2.1 million increase in legal, consulting, and other advisory costs and a $0.3$1.1 million decreasenet increase in facility and other related support costs.share-based compensation expense.  The $2.5$1.1 million net increase in share-based compensation expense is primarily due to the inclusion, in the share-based compensation expense in the first quarter of 2016, of a reversal of $1.6 million of previously recorded share-based compensation expense due to pre-vesting forfeitures of certain stock options of two executives who departed during the 2016 executive management reorganization, and the grant of stock options in 2017 under the 2013 Equity Plan. General and administrative headcount decreased 7.7% to 298 at December 31, 2017 from 323 at December 31, 2016.  

As a result of the grant of stock optionsadditional awards under the 2013 Equity Plan, we expect that share-based compensation expense, a portion of which is recognized as general and administrative expense, will continue to be a significant recurring expense.  As of December 31, 2017, we estimated that approximately $9.8 million of additional share-based compensation expense will be recognized as general and administrative expense over a remaining weighted average period of 2.0 years.  See “Overview” and Note 11, Share-based Compensation, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the 2013 Equity Plan and related share-based compensation expense.

General and administrative expenses decreased $1.3 million during 2016, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to a $5.5 million net decrease in share-based compensation expense, a $1.2 million decrease in compensation and related costs primarily due to a reduction in compensation expenses associated with two executives who departed during the 2016 executive management reorganization, a $0.7 million decrease in facility and other related support costs, and a $0.2 million decrease in non-income taxes, partially offset by a $1.9 million increase in severance costs associated withcertain awards becoming fully vested and the streamlining of our finance organization, a $1.7 million increase in legal, consulting, and other advisory costs, a $1.2 million increase in travel and entertainment expenditures, a $1.0 million increase in other aircraft-related operating costs, and a $0.6 million increase in recruiting costs.  The $5.5 million net decrease in share-based compensation expense is primarily due to a $1.6 million reversal of previously recorded share-based compensation expense due to pre-vesting forfeituresforfeiture of certain stock optionsoptions.

Digital asset impairment losses.  Digital asset impairment losses are recognized when the carrying value of two executives who departed duringour digital assets exceeds their lowest fair value at any time since their acquisition.  Impaired digital assets are written down to fair value at the 2016 executive management reorganization,time of impairment, and a decrease of $4.3 millionsuch impairment loss cannot be recovered for any subsequent increases in share-based compensation no longer being recognized due to their departures.  Included in the above components is an aggregate $1.4 million favorable foreign currency exchange impact.  General and administrative headcount increased 4.2% to 323 at December 31, 2016 from 310 at December 31, 2015.


Research and development expenses.  Research and development expenses consist of the personnel costs for our software engineering personnel, depreciation of equipment, and other related costs.fair value.  The following table summarizes research and development expenses and amortization of capitalized software development costssets forth digital asset impairment losses (in thousands) and related percentage changes for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

% Change

 

 

% Change

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

in 2017

 

 

in 2016

 

Gross research and development expenses before capitalized software development costs

 

$

78,766

 

 

$

73,142

 

 

$

74,804

 

 

 

7.7

%

 

 

-2.2

%

Capitalized software development costs

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(9,598

)

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

-100.0

%

Total research and development expenses

 

$

78,766

 

 

$

73,142

 

 

$

65,206

 

 

 

7.7

%

 

 

12.2

%

Amortization of capitalized software development costs included in cost of product licenses revenues

 

$

5,998

 

 

$

7,357

 

 

$

7,212

 

 

 

-18.5

%

 

 

2.0

%

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

% Change

Digital asset impairment losses

 

$

70,698

 

 

$

0

 

 

n/a

 

Research and development expenses, before capitalizationWe did not sell any of software development costs, increased $5.6 millionour digital assets during 2017, as compared to the prior year primarily due to a $2.5 million increase in compensation and related costs due to an increase in staffing levels, a $1.0 million increase in facility and other related support costs, a $0.8 million increase in consulting and advisory costs, a $0.6 million net increase in share-based compensation expense related to the grant of stock options under the 2013 Equity Plan, a $0.2 million increase in employee relations expenses, and a $0.2 million increase in travel and entertainment expenditures.  Research and development headcount increased 9.2% to 559 atended December 31, 2017 from 512 at December 31, 2016. We expect to increase our investment in our technology products and personnel in future periods as described in the “Overview” section above.  We have significantly accelerated the pace of our software development efforts and increased the frequency of our software releases subsequent to the release of MicroStrategy 10, which has resulted in our software development costs in recent periods being expensed as incurred.  We do not expect to capitalize a material amount of software development costs in the near term.

As a result of the grant of stock options under the 2013 Equity Plan, we expect that share-based compensation expense, a portion of which is recognized as research and development expense, will continue to be a significant recurring expense.  As of December 31, 2017, we estimated that approximately $3.4 million of additional share-based compensation expense will be recognized as research and development expense over a remaining weighted average period of 2.3 years.  See “Overview” and Note 11, Share-based Compensation, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the 2013 Equity Plan and related share-based compensation expense.

Research and development expenses, before capitalization of software development costs, decreased $1.7 million during 2016, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to a $0.8 million decrease in compensation and related costs, a $0.6 million decrease in facility and other related support costs, and a $0.3 million decrease in consulting and advisory costs, partially offset by a $0.2 million increase in travel and entertainment expenditures.  Research and development headcount increased 11.1% to 512 at December 31, 2016 from 461 at December 31, 2015.

2020.

 

Other (Expense) Income, Net

Other (expense) income, net is comprised primarily of foreign currency transaction gains and losses and gains and losses on our foreign currency forward contracts.  During 2017,2020, other expense, net, of $7.0 million was comprised primarily of foreign currency transaction net losses arising mainly from the revaluation of U.S. dollar denominated cash balances held at international locations.  During 2016,2019, other income, net, of $3.2$28.4 million was comprised primarily of foreign currency transaction net gains, arising mainlya $29.8 million gain from the revaluation of U.S. dollar denominated cash balances held at international locations, in addition to outstanding balances denominatedDomain Name Sale in the British Pound, which had declined in value as compared to the U.S. dollar.  During 2015, other income, net,second quarter of $3.6 million was comprised primarily of $2.4 million in foreign currency transaction net gains, arising mainly from the revaluation of U.S. dollar denominated cash balances held at international locations, $0.5 million in net gains from the settlement of certain foreign currency forward contracts, and the reclassification of a $0.3 million foreign currency translation gain from other comprehensive income as a result of the completion of the liquidation of one of our foreign subsidiaries.2019.  


(Benefit from) Provision for Income Taxes

During 2017,2020, we recorded a provision forbenefit from income taxes of $55.0$12.4 million on pre-tax losses of $20.0 million that resulted in an effective tax rate of 75.7%62.3%, as compared to a provision for income taxes of $22.1$3.9 million on pre-tax income of $38.3 million that resulted in an effective tax rate of 19.6%10.2% during 2016.2019.  The change in our effective tax rate in 2017,2020, as compared to the prior year, was primarily due to an estimated one-time tax provisioncertain discrete items, overall income or loss level, and the change in the proportion of $44.0 million asU.S. versus foreign income.

The Tax Act imposed a result of the Tax Act.  This tax provision is comprised of a $40.3 million tax expense related to the mandatory deemed repatriation transition tax (“Transition Tax”) and a $3.7 million charge related to the re-measurement of net deferred tax assets arising from the new lower corporate tax rate effected by the Tax Act.

The Tax Act imposes a Transition Tax on previously untaxed accumulated and current earnings and profits (“E&P”) of certain of our foreign subsidiaries.  To determine the amountThe Company recorded a final tax expense of $37.2 million related to the Transition Tax, we must determine, among other things, the amountcomprised of post-1986 E&P of the relevant subsidiaries, as well as the amount of non-U.S. income taxes paid on such earnings. We made a reasonable estimate of the Transition Tax and recorded a provisional Transition Tax obligation of $40.3 million in 2017 and a subsequent $(3.1) million measurement-period adjustment in 2018.  The Company has elected to pay the Transition Tax over an eight-year period beginning in 2018, as permitted under the Tax Act.  As of December 31, 2020, $28.0 million of the Transition Tax was unpaid, of which $36.8$25.1 million is recordedincluded in “other“Other long-term liabilities” and $3.0 million is included in “Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and operating lease liabilities” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.  However, we continue to gather additional information to compute more precisely the post-1986 E&P and related non-U.S. income taxes paid.

The Tax Act also reduced the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018.  Consequently, we have recorded a decrease related to our U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities, with a corresponding net deferred income tax expense of $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 as a result of re-measuring net deferred tax assets at the new lower corporate tax rate of 21%.

Additionally, the Tax Act requires certain Global Intangible Low Taxed Income (“GILTI”) earned by controlled foreign corporations (“CFCs”) to be included in the gross income of the CFCs’ U.S. shareholder.  GAAP allows us to either: (i) treat taxes due on future U.S. inclusions in taxable income related to GILTI as a current-period expense when incurred (the “period cost method”); or (ii) factor such amounts into our measurement of deferred taxes (the “deferred method”).  We elected the period cost method. The GILTI tax rules will become effective for the 2018 tax year and therefore we have not made any adjustments related to the potential GILTI tax in our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. We continue to evaluate the impact of the new GILTI tax rules and the application of ASC 740 on our financial statements.

As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had no U.S. federal NOLnet operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards and had$7.9 million of foreign NOL carryforwards of $2.5 million.carryforwards.  As of December 31, 2017,2020, foreign NOL carryforwards, other temporary differences and carryforwards, and credits resulted in deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances, and deferred tax liabilities, of $13.4$6.5 million.

As of December 31, 2017,2020, we also had a deferred tax liability of $8.2 million primarily due to the debt discount on the Company’s convertible senior notes, property and equipment depreciation, and other temporary differences.


As of December 31, 2020, we had a valuation allowance of $1.0$1.3 million primarily related to certain foreign tax credit carryforwardscarryforward tax assets that, in our present estimation, more likely than not will not be realized.  We assessed whether our valuation allowance analyses are affected by various aspects of the Tax Act (e.g., deemed repatriation of deferred foreign income, GILTI inclusions, new categories of foreign tax credits) and concluded that they were not significantly affected by the Tax Act.

If we are unable to sustainregain profitability in future periods, we may be required to increase the valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, which could result in a charge that would materially adversely affect net (loss) income in the period in which the charge is incurred. We will continue to regularly assess the realizability of deferred tax assets.

Except as discussed below,Beginning in the third quarter of 2020, we no longer intend to indefinitelypermanently reinvest our undistributedforeign earnings of all of our foreign subsidiaries.  However, under the Tax Act, those undistributed earnings (as computed for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and with due regard to the discussion below regarding Subpart F deemed dividends) are subject toprofits.  After taking into account the Transition Tax which was recorded at a provisional amount of $40.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2017.

In addition, U.S. federaland GILTI tax, laws require us to include in our U.S. taxable income certain investment income earned outside of the United States in excess of certain limits (“Subpart F deemed dividends”).  Because Subpart F deemed dividends are already required to be recognized in our U.S. federal income tax return, we regularly repatriate


Subpart F deemed dividends to the United States and no additional tax is incurred on the distribution.  We repatriated Subpart F deemed dividends of $1.8 million and $1.9 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively, with no additional tax.  We did not repatriate any Subpart F deemed dividends in 2015 because we did not report any Subpart F income on our 2014 U.S. tax return.

During 2015, we recorded a provision fortax expense of $1.7 million on undistributed foreign earnings of $136.3 million related to foreign withholding tax and U.S. state income taxes of $31.9 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 23.2%.  The change in our effective tax rate in 2016, as compared to the prior year, was primarily due to the 2016 change in the proportion of U.S. versus foreign income and certain discrete tax benefits recorded in 2016.2020.

Deferred Revenue and Advance Payments

Deferred revenue and advance payments represent subscription services, product support, and other services fees that are collectedamounts received or due from our customers in advance of our transferring our software or services to the customer.  In the case of multi-year service contracts arrangements, the Company generally does not invoice more than one year in advance of services and does not record deferred revenue for amounts that have not been invoiced and that require an additional contract. Revenue is subsequently recognized overin the contract service period, and product licenses revenues relatingperiod(s) in which control of the software or services is transferred to multiple-element software arrangements that include future deliverables.the customer.

The following table summarizes deferred revenue and advance payments (in thousands), as of:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred product licenses revenue

 

$

11,113

 

 

$

13,023

 

 

$

13,506

 

 

$

1,495

 

 

$

481

 

Deferred subscription services revenue

 

 

17,324

 

 

 

18,303

 

 

 

15,763

 

 

 

26,258

 

 

 

16,561

 

Deferred product support revenue

 

 

168,043

 

 

 

162,781

 

 

 

158,738

 

 

 

156,216

 

 

 

161,670

 

Deferred other services revenue

 

 

9,465

 

 

 

10,015

 

 

 

9,149

 

 

 

7,281

 

 

 

8,395

 

Gross current deferred revenue and advance payments

 

 

205,945

 

 

 

204,122

 

 

 

197,156

 

Less: unpaid deferred revenue

 

 

(93,296

)

 

 

(98,587

)

 

 

(96,461

)

Net current deferred revenue and advance payments

 

$

112,649

 

 

$

105,535

 

 

$

100,695

 

Total current deferred revenue and advance payments

 

$

191,250

 

 

$

187,107

 

Non-current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred product licenses revenue

 

$

7,169

 

 

$

9,118

 

 

$

5,397

 

 

$

139

 

 

$

293

 

Deferred subscription services revenue

 

 

126

 

 

 

1,307

 

 

 

2,138

 

 

 

8,758

 

 

 

97

 

Deferred product support revenue

 

 

4,826

 

 

 

5,751

 

 

 

7,607

 

 

 

5,055

 

 

 

3,417

 

Deferred other services revenue

 

 

628

 

 

 

690

 

 

 

795

 

 

 

710

 

 

 

537

 

Gross non-current deferred revenue and advance payments

 

 

12,749

 

 

 

16,866

 

 

 

15,937

 

Less: unpaid deferred revenue

 

 

(2,568

)

 

 

(2,951

)

 

 

(6,942

)

Net non-current deferred revenue and advance payments

 

$

10,181

 

 

$

13,915

 

 

$

8,995

 

Total non-current deferred revenue and advance payments

 

$

14,662

 

 

$

4,344

 

Total current and non-current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred product licenses revenue

 

$

18,282

 

 

$

22,141

 

 

$

18,903

 

 

$

1,634

 

 

$

774

 

Deferred subscription services revenue

 

 

17,450

 

 

 

19,610

 

 

 

17,901

 

 

 

35,016

 

 

 

16,658

 

Deferred product support revenue

 

 

172,869

 

 

 

168,532

 

 

 

166,345

 

 

 

161,271

 

 

 

165,087

 

Deferred other services revenue

 

 

10,093

 

 

 

10,705

 

 

 

9,944

 

 

 

7,991

 

 

 

8,932

 

Gross current and non-current deferred revenue and advance payments

 

 

218,694

 

 

 

220,988

 

 

 

213,093

 

Less: unpaid deferred revenue

 

 

(95,864

)

 

 

(101,538

)

 

 

(103,403

)

Net current and non-current deferred revenue and advance payments

 

$

122,830

 

 

$

119,450

 

 

$

109,690

 

Total current and non-current deferred revenue and advance payments

 

$

205,912

 

 

$

191,451

 

 

We offset our accounts receivable and deferred revenue for any unpaid items included in deferred revenue and advance payments.

Total gross deferred revenue and advance payments decreased $2.3increased $14.5 million in 2017, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to the recognition of previously deferred product licenses, subscription services, and other services revenues, partially offset by an increase in product support contracts. Total gross deferred revenue and advance


payments increased $7.9 million in 2016,2020, as compared to the prior year, primarily due to an increase in deferred revenue from new subscription services contracts, including certain multi-year arrangements and customers converting from product licenses to our subscription services offerings, and an increase in deferred revenue from new product license contracts, partially offset by decreases in deferred product support from certain customers converting from perpetual product licenses to term product licenses or subscription services offerings and the recognition of previously deferred other services contracts.revenues.  Included in our international deferred revenue balances at December 31, 2020 is a $4.3 million favorable foreign currency impact from the general weakening of the U.S. dollar compared to the same period in the prior year.

We expect to recognize approximately $205.9$191.3 million of deferred revenue and advance payments over the next 12 months. However, the timing and ultimate recognition of our deferred revenue and advance payments depend on our performance


satisfaction of various serviceperformance obligations, and the amount of deferred revenue and advance payments at any date should not be considered indicative of revenues for any succeeding period.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity. Our principal sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents and on-going collection of our accounts receivable. Cash and cash equivalents may include holdings in bank demand deposits, money market instruments, certificates of deposit, and U.S. Treasury securities.  We have also periodically investinvested a portion of our excess cash in short-term investments with stated maturity dates between three months and one year from the purchase date.  In 2020, we invested a significant portion of our cash in bitcoin. As discussed in Note 2.g, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Digital Assets, to our Consolidated Financial Statements, our bitcoin are classified as indefinite-lived intangible assets.

 

As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the amount of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments held by our U.S. entities was $293.8$13.7 million and $279.8$289.4 million, respectively, and by our non-U.S. entities was $381.4$46.0 million and $309.6$276.2 million, respectively. We earn a significant amount of our revenues outside the United States and except for Subpart F deemed dividends,our accumulated undistributed foreign earnings and profits as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 were $136.3 million and $231.2 million, respectively. Beginning in the third quarter of 2020, we no longer intend to indefinitelypermanently reinvest undistributedour foreign earnings of all of our non-U.S. entities.  We do not anticipate needing to repatriate the cash or cash equivalents held by non-U.S. entities to the United States to finance our U.S. operations.  However, under the Tax Act, those undistributed earnings (as computed for U.S. federal income tax purposes) are subject to the Transition Tax, which was recorded at a provisional amount of $40.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2017.  We intend to elect to pay this tax over an eight-year period beginning in 2018. If we were to elect to actually repatriate these amounts, afterand profits.  After taking into account the Transition Tax described above,and GILTI tax, we do not expect such repatriationrecorded a tax expense of $1.7 million on the undistributed foreign earnings related to generate any additionalforeign withholding tax and U.S. federal taxablestate income to us.taxes in 2020.

We believe that existing cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments held by us and cash and cash equivalents anticipated to be generated by us are sufficient to meet working capital requirements, anticipated capital expenditures, and contractual obligations for at least the next 12 months. As of December 31, 2020, we held approximately 70,469 bitcoins.  We do not believe we will need to sell any of our bitcoins within the next twelve months to meet our working capital requirements, although we may from time to time sell bitcoins as part of treasury management operations, including to increase our cash balances. The Bitcoin market historically has been characterized by significant volatility in its price, limited liquidity and trading volumes compared to sovereign currencies markets, relative anonymity, a developing regulatory landscape, susceptibility to market abuse and manipulation, and various other risks inherent in its entirely electronic, virtual form and decentralized network.  During times of instability in the Bitcoin market, we may not be able to sell our bitcoins at reasonable prices or at all.  As a result, our bitcoins are less liquid than our existing cash and cash equivalents and may not be able to serve as a source of liquidity for us to the same extent as cash and cash equivalents.  In addition, upon sale of our bitcoin, we may incur additional taxes related to any realized gains or we may incur capital losses as to which the tax deduction may be limited.

The following table sets forth a summary of our cash flows (in thousands) and related percentage changes for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

% Change

 

 

% Change

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

in 2017

 

 

in 2016

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

% Change

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

$

78,322

 

 

$

110,589

 

 

$

149,699

 

 

 

-29.2

%

 

 

-26.1

%

 

$

53,619

 

 

$

60,867

 

 

 

-11.9

%

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 

$

(69,730

)

 

$

4,344

 

 

$

(7,661

)

 

 

-1705.2

%

 

 

-156.7

%

 

$

(1,018,693

)

 

$

353,687

 

 

 

388.0

%

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

$

1,656

 

 

$

(1,004

)

 

$

9,178

 

 

 

-264.9

%

 

 

-110.9

%

 

$

563,233

 

 

$

(66,150

)

 

 

951.4

%

 

Net cash provided by operating activities.  The primary source of our cash provided by operating activities is cash collections of our accounts receivable from customers following the sales and renewals of our softwareproduct licenses technical softwareand product support, software updates and upgrades, as well as consulting, education, and subscription services.services, and, in 2019, consideration received from the Domain Name Sale, net of related income taxes and immaterial transaction costs. Our primary uses of cash in operating activities are for personnel relatedpersonnel-related expenditures for software development, personnel relatedpersonnel-related expenditures for providing consulting, education, and subscription services, and for sales and marketing costs, general and administrative costs, and income taxes. Non-cash items to further reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities consist primarily of depreciation and amortization, reduction in the carrying amount of ROU assets, credit losses and sales allowances, deferred taxes, release of liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits,


share-based compensation expense, digital asset impairment losses, gain on partial lease termination, and amortization of the debt discount and issuance costs on our convertible senior notes.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $78.3 million, $110.6 million, and $149.7decreased $7.2 million during 2017, 2016,2020, as compared to the prior year, due to a $41.9 million decrease in net income and 2015, respectively.  Thea $27.7 million decrease from changes in operating assets and liabilities, partially offset by a $62.3 million increase from changes in non-cash items, which included digital asset impairment losses of $70.7 million. Included in net cash provided by operating activities during 2017, as compared to2019 is a gain of $21.7 from the prior year, was due to a $73.3 million decrease inDomain Name Sale, net of related income offset by a $36.5 million increase from changes in operating assetstaxes and liabilities and a $4.5 million increase from changes in non-cash items. The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities during 2016, as compared to the prior year, was due to a $25.7 million decrease from changes in non-cash items and a $15.0 million decrease in net income, offset by a $1.6 million increase from changes in operating assets and liabilities.  Non-cash items generally consist of depreciation and amortization, bad


debt expense, deferred taxes, release of liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits, share-based compensation expense, and, in prior periods only, excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements.immaterial transaction costs.

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities.  The changes in net cash (used in) provided by investing activities primarily relate to purchases of digital assets, purchases and redemptions of short-term investments, and expenditures on property and equipment, and capitalized software development costs.equipment.  Net cash used in investing activities was $69.7 million and $7.7$1,018.7 million during 2017 and 2015, respectively.  Net2020, while net cash provided by investing activities was $4.3$353.7 million during 2016.2019.  The increasechange in net cash used in(used in) provided by investing activities during 2017, as compared to the prior year, was due to a $101.5$1,125.0 million increase in purchasespurchase of short-term investmentsbitcoins and a $1.6 million increase in purchases of property and equipment, offset by a $29.0 million increase in proceeds from the redemption of short-term investments. The increase in net cash provided by investing activities during 2016, as compared to the prior year, was due to a $118.8 million decrease in purchases of short-term investments, a $9.6 million decrease in capitalized software development costs, and a $1.1 million decrease in purchases of property and equipment, offset by a $117.5$564.5 million decrease in proceeds from the redemption of short-term investments.investments, partially offset by a $310.6 million decrease in purchases of short-term investments and a $6.5 million decrease in purchases of property and equipment.

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities.The changes in net cash provided by (used in) financing activities primarily relate to the issuance of our convertible senior notes, purchase of treasury stock, and the exercise of stock options under the 2013 Equity Plan, payments on capital lease and other financing arrangements, and, in prior periods only, excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements.Plan. Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.7 million and $9.2$563.2 million during 2017 and 2015, respectively. Net2020, while net cash used in financing activities was $1.0$66.2 million during 2016.in 2019.  The increasechange in net cash provided by (used in) financing activities during 2017, as compared to the prior year, was primarily due to a $3.7$650.0 million payment in 2016 to tax authorities for shares withheld for taxes related to the net exercise of a stock option under the 2013 Equity Plangross proceeds from our convertible senior notes and a $0.2$44.5 million decrease in payments on capital lease and other financing arrangements, partially offset by a $1.2 million decrease in excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements. The increase in net cash used in financing activities during 2016, as compared to the prior year, was primarily due to a $7.9 million decrease in proceeds from the exercise of stock options under the 2013 Equity Plan, and a $3.7 million payment to tax authorities for shares withheld for taxes related to the net exercise of a stock option under the 2013 Equity Plan, partially offset by a $1.3$50.5 million decreaseincrease in payments onpurchases of treasury stock and $14.6 million of issuance costs paid for our convertible senior notes.   

Convertible Senior Notes

In December 2020, we issued $650.0 million aggregate principal amount of 0.750% Convertible Senior Notes due 2025. We invested the net proceeds from the issuance of the notes in bitcoin in accordance with our Treasury Reserve Policy pending the identification of working capital leaseneeds and other financing arrangements.general corporate purposes.  The terms of the convertible notes are discussed more fully in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Share repurchases. Our Board of Directors has authorized us to repurchase up to an aggregate of $800.0 million of our class A common stock from time to time on the open market through April 29, 2018 (the “20052023 under the Share Repurchase Program”),Program, although the program may be suspended or discontinued by us at any time.  The timing and amount of any shares repurchased will be determined by management based on its evaluation of market conditions and other factors.  The 2005 Share Repurchase Program may be funded using working capital, as well as proceeds from any other funding arrangements that we may enter into in the future. During the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015,2020, we did not repurchase anyrepurchased an aggregate of 444,769 shares of our class A common stock at an average price per share of $139.12 and an aggregate cost of $61.9 million pursuant to the 2005 Share Repurchase Program.

Contractual obligations. As disclosed in Note 9, Commitments and Contingencies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we lease office space and computer and other equipment under operating lease agreements.  Under the lease agreements, in addition to base rent, we are generally responsible for certain taxes, utilities and maintenance costs, and other fees. Several of these leases include options for renewal or purchase.  We do not have any material capital leases.

As a result of the Tax Act, we estimated and recorded a one-time Transition Tax of $40.3 million during  During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, we repurchased an aggregate of 521,843 shares of our class A common stock at an average price per share of $139.35 and intend to elect to pay this tax over an eight-year period beginning in 2018.  See Note 10, Income Taxes,aggregate cost of $72.7 million pursuant to the Consolidated Financial StatementsShare Repurchase Program.

On August 11, 2020, we announced that we commenced a “modified Dutch Auction” tender offer (the “Offer”) to purchase up to $250.0 million in value of shares of our issued and outstanding class A common stock, or such lesser number of shares as are properly tendered and not properly withdrawn, at a price not greater than $140.00 nor less than $122.00 per share. The Offer expired at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on September 10, 2020. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we repurchased an aggregate of 432,313 shares of our class A common stock through the Offer at a price of $140.00 per share for further information.an aggregate cost of $61.3 million, inclusive of $0.8 million in certain fees and expenses related to the Offer.


Contractual obligations.The following table shows future minimum rent payments under noncancellable operating leases, payments related to our convertible senior notes (semi-annual interest payments and principal upon maturity), payments under purchase agreements with initial terms of greater than one year, net of total future minimum rent payments to be received under noncancellable sublease agreements, and anticipated payments related to the one-time Transition Tax resulting from the Tax Act, based on the expected due dates of the various installments as of December 31, 20172020 (in thousands):

 

 

Payments due by period ended December 31,

 

 

Payments due by period ended December 31,

 

 

Total

 

 

2018

 

 

2019-2020

 

 

2021-2022

 

 

Thereafter

 

 

Total

 

 

2021

 

 

2022-2023

 

 

2024-2025

 

 

Thereafter

 

Contractual Obligations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating leases

 

$

71,990

 

 

$

24,508

 

 

$

38,838

 

 

$

4,368

 

 

$

4,276

 

 

$

133,481

 

 

$

16,738

 

 

$

30,884

 

 

$

25,785

 

 

$

60,074

 

Transition tax

 

 

40,250

 

 

 

3,450

 

 

 

6,400

 

 

 

6,400

 

 

 

24,000

 

Convertible senior notes

 

 

674,443

 

 

 

4,740

 

 

 

9,750

 

 

 

659,953

 

 

 

0

 

Purchase obligations

 

 

34,602

 

 

 

13,825

 

 

 

18,378

 

 

 

1,351

 

 

 

1,048

 

Transition Tax

 

 

28,039

 

 

 

2,951

 

 

 

8,486

 

 

 

16,602

 

 

 

0

 

Total

 

$

112,240

 

 

$

27,958

 

 

$

45,238

 

 

$

10,768

 

 

$

28,276

 

 

$

870,565

 

 

$

38,254

 

 

$

67,498

 

 

$

703,691

 

 

$

61,122

 

The above table does not include estimated payments related to the renewal of our corporate headquarters office lease in January 2018. See Note 17, Subsequent Events, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information about our corporate headquarters office lease.

 

Unrecognized tax benefits. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had $4.0$4.6 million of total gross unrecognized tax benefits, including accrued interest, accrued, recorded in other“Other long-term liabilities. The timing of any payments that could result from these unrecognized tax benefits will depend on a number of factors, and accordingly the amount and period of any future payments cannot be estimated. We do not expect any significant tax payments related to these obligations during 2018.2021.

Off-balance sheet arrangements.  As of December 31, 2017,2020, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that had or were reasonably likely to have a current or future material impact on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources.

Recent Accounting Standards

Share-based compensation accounting

In March 2016, the FASB issuedSee Note 3, Recent Accounting Standards, Update No. 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”), to simplify certain aspects of accounting for share-based payment transactions.  Under ASU 2016-09, all excess tax benefits should be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement, regardless of whether the benefit reduces taxes payable in the current period.  The excess tax benefits will be combined with other income tax cash flows within operating activities in the statement of cash flows.  In addition, excess tax benefits or tax deficiencies will no longer be included in the calculation of assumed proceeds under the treasury stock method of computing diluted earnings per share. ASU 2016-09 also allows companies to make an accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards expected to vest or to account for forfeitures as they occur, when accruing share-based compensation expense. Lastly, ASU 2016-09 permits employers to withhold up to the employee’s maximum statutory tax rate in applicable jurisdictions and still qualify for the exception to liability classification. Cash paid by an employer when directly withholding shares for tax-withholding purposes should be classified as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows. We adopted this guidance on January 1, 2017 and have:

(i)

recognized excess tax benefits as part of the “Provision for income taxes” line item in our Consolidated Financial Statements of Operations, on a prospective basis.  

(ii)

combined the impact of excess tax benefits with the “Deferred taxes” line item within operating activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, on a prospective basis.  

(iii)

excluded excess tax benefits or tax deficiencies in the calculation of our diluted earnings per share, on a prospective basis; and  

(iv)

made an accounting policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur, on a modified retrospective basis, the impact of which is generally consistent with our previous method of estimating forfeitures.  

No prior periods have been adjusted in connection with our adoption of ASU 2016-09.  In addition, no cumulative-effect adjustments to retained earnings have been recorded as of January 1, 2017 because there were no unrecognized excess tax benefits or tax deficiencies outstanding and no expected forfeitures applied to our share-


based compensation expense as of the end of the preceding year.  The remaining amendments under ASU 2016-09 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

Statement of cash flows

In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) (“ASU 2016-18”), to address the diversity in practice that currently exists regarding the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash on the statement of cash flows. Under ASU 2016-18, entities will be required to include restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents with total cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning and end of period amounts on the statement of cash flows. Entities will also be required to disclose information about the nature of their restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. Additionally, if cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents are presented in more than one line item in the statement of financial position, entities will be required to present a reconciliation, either on the face of the statement of cash flows or disclosed in the notes, of the totals in the statement of cash flows to the related line item captions in the statement of financial position. We adopted this guidance on January 1, 2017 and retrospectively applied the required updates to our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for all periods presented. We do not consider our restricted cash balances to be material for further disclosure or reconciliation. The adoption of this guidance did not impact our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or footnote disclosures.

Revenue from contracts with customers

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance.  The standard’s core principle is that an entity should recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  The standard also requires disclosure of additional information to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers.

We will adopt this guidance and its subsequent amendments effective as of January 1, 2018 and will adjust prior period consolidated financial statements to reflect full retrospective adoption, beginning with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the first quarter of 2018.  We have substantially completed the implementation of key system changes and changes to internal controls over financial reporting to allow us to timely compile the information needed to account for transactions under this new guidance and to adjust our prior periods’ consolidated financial statements.

In adopting ASU 2014-09, we expect the following significant changes in accounting principles:

(i)

Timing of revenue recognition for term license sales. Under ASU 2014-09, we will recognize product license revenue from term licenses upon delivery of the software.  Previously, this revenue was recognized over the term of the arrangement.

(ii)

Timing of revenue recognition for sales to channel partners.  Under ASU 2014-09, we will recognize revenue from sales made to resellers and OEMs when control of the products transfers to the reseller or OEM, less adjustments for returns or price protection.  Previously, this revenue was not recognized until the product was sold by the reseller or OEM to the end user.

(iii)

Allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract.  Under ASU 2014-09, we will allocate the transaction price to the various performance obligations in the contract based on their relative standalone selling price (“SSP”).  Except for SSP of product support, our methodologies for estimating SSP of our various performance obligations will be generally consistent with our previous methodologies used to establish VSOE of fair value on multiple element arrangements.  The SSP of product support will result in a difference in the allocation of the transaction price between product support and product license performance obligations. We expect the impact from SSP-based allocations to be immaterial to the financial statements.


(iv)

Material rights. Our contracts with customers may include options to acquire additional goods and services at a discount.  Under ASU 2014-09, certain of these options may be considered material rights if sold below SSP and would be treated as separate performance obligations and included in the allocation of the transaction price. Previously, none of our options were considered material rights. We expect the impact from material rights to be immaterial to the financial statements.

(v)

Presentation of accounts receivable, contract assets, and contract liabilities (deferred revenue). Under ASU 2014-09, our rights to consideration are presented separately depending on whether those rights are conditional or unconditional. We will present our unconditional rights to consideration as “accounts receivable” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. In contrast, separate “contract assets” will represent rights to consideration that are subject to a condition other than the passage of time, and will be comprised primarily of accrued sales- and usage- based royalty revenue.  Previously, this revenue was not recognized until quarterly royalty reporting had been received from the OEM.  Under ASU 2014-09, once quarterly royalty reporting has been received, the related contract assets will be transferred to accounts receivable.  Current and non-current contract assets will be included under “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” and “Deposits and other assets,” respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.  Further, contract assets will be netted against “contract liabilities” at the contract level.  Contract liabilities will be presented as “deferred revenue” on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and will be comprised of consideration received, or accounts receivable recorded, prior to the transfer of goods or services to the customer.  Under ASU 2014-09, we cannot net accounts receivable with deferred revenue and we will no longer offset our accounts receivable and deferred revenue balances for unpaid items that are included in the deferred revenue balance. Previously, this offsetting of accounts receivable and deferred revenue balances for unpaid amounts was applied in our financial statements.

(vi)

Deferral of incremental direct costs to obtaining a contract with a customer.  Under ASU 2014-09, we will capitalize certain variable compensation (i.e., sales commissions) payable to our sales force and subsequently amortize the capitalized costs over a period of time that is consistent with the transfer of the related good or service to the customer, which we have determined to be three years. Capitalized costs, net of accumulated amortization, will be included in “Deposits and other assets” on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.  Previously, we elected to expense these incremental direct costs as incurred.

We currently estimate the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will increase our 2016 beginning retained earnings balance by approximately $13.0 million, offset by a $13.0 million decrease in gross deferred revenues, a $5.0 million decrease in deferred tax assets, net of deferred tax liabilities, a $4.0 million increase in other non-current assets, and a $1.0 million increase in other current assets.  In addition, net accounts receivable and net deferred revenues as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 will each further increase by approximately $95.9 million and $101.5 million, respectively, due to no longer offsetting these balances for unpaid amounts included in the gross deferred revenue balances.  For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we estimate $2.5 million and $3.0 million, respectively, of previously expensed variable compensation will be capitalized and amortized over a three-year period.  We estimate that product licenses revenues will decrease by approximately $0.5 million and increase by approximately $1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  We also estimate our provision for income taxes will decrease by approximately $1.5 million and increase by approximately $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Intra-entity asset transfers

In October 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory (“ASU 2016-16”), to improve the accounting for income tax effects of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. Under ASU 2016-16, the deferral of the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory is eliminated. Entities will be required to recognize the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory when the transfers occur. The standard requires a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption using a modified retrospective approach. We will adopt this guidance effective as of January 1, 2018. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.information.

 


Lease accounting

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”), which requires lease assets and lease liabilities be recognized for all leases, in addition to the disclosure of key information to enable users of financial statements to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from an entity’s leasing arrangements.  ASU 2016-02 defines a lease as a contract, or part of a contract, that conveys both (i) the right to obtain economic benefits from and (ii) direct the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.  Under ASU 2016-02, leases are classified as either finance or operating leases. For finance leases, a lessee shall recognize in profit or loss the amortization of the lease asset and interest on the lease liability.  For operating leases, a lessee shall recognize in profit or loss a single lease cost, calculated so that the remaining cost of the lease is allocated over the remaining lease term, generally on a straight-line basis.  ASU 2016-02 requires the recognition and measurement of leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach and is effective for interim and annual periods beginning January 1, 2019.  Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The following discussion about our market risk exposures involves forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.

We are exposed to the impact of both interest ratemarket price changes in bitcoin and foreign currency fluctuations.

Interest Rate Risk.Market Price Risk of Bitcoin.  We face exposure to changes in interest rates primarily relating tohave invested a significant portion of our investments. We generally invest our excess cash in short-term, highly-rated, fixed-rate financial instruments. These fixed-rate instrumentsbitcoin and, as of December 31, 2020, we held approximately 70,469 bitcoins. The carrying value of our bitcoins as of December 31, 2020 was $1.054 billion, which reflects cumulative impairments of $70.7 million, on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.  As discussed in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we account for our bitcoin as indefinite-lived intangible assets, which are subject to interest rate riskimpairment losses if the fair value of our bitcoin decreases below their carrying value at any time since their acquisition.  Impairment losses cannot be recovered for any subsequent increase in fair value.  For example, the market price of one bitcoin in our principal market ranged from $10,363.76 - $29,321.90 during the three months ended December 31, 2020, but the carrying value of each bitcoin we held at the end of the reporting period reflects the lowest price of one bitcoin quoted on the active exchange at any time since its acquisition.  Therefore, negative swings in the market price of bitcoin could have a material impact on our earnings and may fallon the carrying value of our digital assets. Positive swings in the market price of bitcoin are not reflected in the carrying value if interest rates increase. We do not hold or invest in these fixed-rate instruments for trading purposes or speculation.of our digital assets and impact earnings only when the bitcoin is sold at a gain. For the year ended December 31, 2020, we incurred impairment losses of $70.7 million on our bitcoin. As of December 31, 2017, we held approximately $254.9 millionFebruary 8, 2021, at 4:00 p.m. EST, the market price of investmentsone bitcoin in U.S. Treasury securities and certificates of deposit with stated maturity dates between three months and one year from the purchase date, and we intend to hold these investments until maturity.our principal market was $44,219.06.


Foreign Currency Risk.  We conduct a significant portion of our business in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the currency in which we report our Consolidated Financial Statements.  International revenues accounted for 41.9%, 39.3%43.7%, and 38.3%42.3% of our total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015,2018, respectively.  We anticipate that international revenues will continue to account for a significant portion of our total revenues. The functional currency of each of our foreign subsidiaries is generally the local currency.

Assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect as of the applicable balance sheetBalance Sheet date and any resulting translation adjustments are included as an adjustment to stockholders’ equity.  Revenues and expenses generated from these subsidiaries are translated at average monthly exchange rates during the quarter in which the transactions occur.  Gains and losses from transactions in local currencies are included in net income.income (loss).

As a result of transacting in multiple currencies and reporting our financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements in U.S. dollars, our operating results may be adversely impacted by currency exchange rate fluctuations in the future.  The impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on current and comparable periods is described in Item 7, “Management’sthe “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

We cannot predict the effect of exchange rate fluctuations upon our future results.  We attempt to minimize our foreign currency risk by converting our excess foreign currency held in foreign jurisdictions to U.S. dollar denominateddollar-denominated cash and investment accounts.  Although we were not party to any foreign currency forward contracts as of December 31, 2017, from time to time we have entered into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge certain risks associated with foreign currency exchange rate exposure, and may do so again in the future. We manage the use of foreign exchange derivative instruments centrally, and we do not hold or enter into derivative financial instruments for trading purposes or speculation.  See Note 4, Fair Value Measurements, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on foreign currency forward contracts.  We cannot be


certain that any future hedging techniques will be successful or that our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows will not be materially adversely affected by exchange rate fluctuations.

As of December 31, 2017,2020, a 10% adverse change in foreign currency exchange rates versus the U.S. dollar would have decreased our aggregate reported cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments by 0.3%3.9%. If average exchange rates during the year ended December 31, 20172020 had changed unfavorably by 10%, our revenues for the year ended December 31, 20172020 would have decreased by 3.9%.  During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, our revenues were higherlower by 0.5%0.2% as a result of a 1.0% favorable0.1% unfavorable change in weighted average exchange rates, as compared to the prior year.

 

 

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Our Consolidated Financial Statements, together with the related notes and the associated Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, are set forth on the pages indicated in Item 15.

 

 

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

 

 

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report.  Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.  Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.  Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.


Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Company’s Board of Directors, management, and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.GAAP.  Such internal control includes those policies and procedures that:

Pertainthat (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

ProvideCompany, (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company;Company, and

Provide (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that the control may become


inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

OurUnder the oversight of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, our management assessedconducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.  In making this assessment, our management used2020 based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).  Based on its assessment, our management has determined that, as of December 31, 2017,2020, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, which audited the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report, has issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting.  This report is included in the Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in Item“Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.”

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

During the third quarter of 2016,fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, we began implementing a plan to transform our worldwide financeimplemented new internal controls surrounding the acquisition, safeguarding, accounting, and accounting organization. Previously, our finance and accounting activities relating to each of the countries where we operate were decentralized, and conducted by personnel based within each respective country. As of the end of the second quarter of 2017, we had completed this transformation. The transformation resulted in the consolidationreporting of our worldwide financedigital assets and the accounting functions into three geographically based centers of excellence. While the nature and operationreporting of our key transaction-level controls did not materially change as a result of the transformation, the personnel executing the controls and the locations where the controls are performed have changed. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2017, we implemented aconvertible senior notes. Other than these new professional service automation system to track billable time used to invoice customers, as well as process internal business travel and entertainment expenses. The implementation of this new system did not change the underlying internal controls.

Throughout 2017, in order to facilitate our adoption of the new revenue recognition accounting standard on January 1, 2018, we implemented internal controls to help ensure we properly evaluated our customer contracts, executed key system changes, and assessed the impact to our consolidated financial statements. We expect to continue to implement additional internal controls related to the adoption of this standard in the first quarter of 2018.

We also continue to evaluate the impact of the Tax Act on our internal controls over financial reporting, but do not currently expect this new legislation will require us to make significantour digital assets and convertible senior notes, there have been no changes toin our existing internal controls related to income taxes.

We believe that we have maintained appropriate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2020 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.  We are continually monitoring and assessing the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on our internal control over financial reporting to minimize the impact on the design and operating effectiveness of such internal control. We have not experienced any material impact on our internal control over financial reporting despite the fact that many of our employees are working remotely as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

 


Item 9B.

Other Information

None.

2020 Cash Bonus Determinations for Certain Executive Officers

 

On February 8, 2021, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer determined cash bonus awards for the following executive officers of the Company in the amounts set forth opposite their respective names, in each case with respect to the executive’s performance in 2020:

Timothy E. Lang

 

$

550,000

 

Senior Executive Vice President & Chief Technology Officer

 

 

 

 

Phong Q. Le

 

$

900,000

 

President & Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

W. Ming Shao

 

$

550,000

 

Senior Executive Vice President & General Counsel

 

 

 

 

The Chief Executive Officer determined the foregoing awards based on his subjective evaluation of the applicable executive’s performance in the context of general economic and industry conditions and Company performance during 2020.

Salary Determinations for Certain Executive Officers

On February 8, 2021, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer approved increases to the annual salaries of the following executive officers of the Company, resulting in the amounts set forth opposite their respective names, effective January 1, 2021:

Timothy E. Lang

 

$

600,000

 

Phong Q. Le

 

$

900,000

 

W. Ming Shao

 

$

600,000

 

 


PART III

 

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information provided under the headings “Executive Officers of the Company,” “Election of Directors – Nominees,” and “Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors and its Committees” in our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172020 (the “2018“2021 Proxy Statement”).

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information provided under the headings “Executive and Director Compensation,” “Compensation Committee Report,” and “Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors and its Committees – Compensation Committee” in the 20182021 Proxy Statement.

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information provided under the headings “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management,”Management” and “Executive and Director Compensation” in the 20182021 Proxy Statement.

Item 13.

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information provided under the heading “Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors and its Committees” in the 20182021 Proxy Statement.

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information provided under the heading “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Services” in the 20182021 Proxy Statement.

 

 


PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a)

The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:Report:

 

1.

Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

 

 

Page

 

Page

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

72

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

67

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Financial Statements:

 

Consolidated Financial Statements:

 

 

 

 

 

Balance Sheets

75

Balance Sheets

71

 

 

 

 

Statements of Operations

76

Statements of Operations

72

 

 

 

 

Statements of Comprehensive Income

77

Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income

73

 

 

 

 

Statements of Stockholders Equity

78

Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

74

 

 

 

 

Statements of Cash Flows

79

Statements of Cash Flows

75

 

 

 

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

80

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

76

 

 

 

 

2.

Exhibits

103

Exhibits

109

 

 

 

 

3.

Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule

 

Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule

 

 

 

 

 

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

106

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

112

 

(b)

Exhibits

We hereby file as part of this Annual Report on Form 10‑K the exhibits listed in the Index to Exhibits.

(c)

Financial Statement Schedule

The following financial statement schedule is filed herewith:

Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

All other items included in an Annual Report on Form 10‑K are omitted because they are not applicable or the answers thereto are none.

Item 16.

Form 10-K Summary

None.

 


Report of Independent RegisteredRegistered Public Accounting Firm

To the stockholdersStockholders and boardBoard of directors

Directors MicroStrategy Incorporated:

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited MicroStrategy Incorporated and subsidiaries’ (the “Company”)Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.  

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”)(PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017,2020, and the related notes and the financial statement schedule, listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(3)Schedule II, Valuation and Qualifying Accounts, (collectively, the “consolidatedconsolidated financial statements”)statements), and our report dated February 7, 201812, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ KPMG LLP

McLean, Virginia

February 7, 201812, 2021


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the stockholdersStockholders and boardBoard of directors

Directors MicroStrategy Incorporated:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of MicroStrategy Incorporated and subsidiaries (the “Company”)Company) as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2017,2020, and the related notes and the financial statement schedule, listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(3)Schedule II, Valuation and Qualifying Accounts, (collectively, the “consolidatedconsolidated financial statements”)statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2017,2020, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”)(PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 7, 201812, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases as of January 1, 2019 due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) and its subsequent amendments (“ASU 2016-02”).

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.


Evaluation of standalone selling price for standard product support

As discussed in Note 2(n) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company typically sells its software licenses (product licenses) together with technical support services and rights to when-and-if available software upgrades (standard product support). Product license revenue is recognized at the point when control to the license is transferred to the customer while standard product support revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the product support period.  The accounting for revenue from contracts with multiple performance obligations requires the transaction price to be allocated to each distinct performance obligation based on their respective relative standalone selling price (SSP). Because product licenses are not sold on a standalone basis and because pricing is highly variable, the Company establishes SSP of product licenses using a residual approach after first establishing the SSP of standard product support based on observable standalone sales with pricing within a narrow range as a percentage of the net license fee.

We identified the evaluation of the SSP for standard product support as a critical audit matter. Especially subjective auditor judgment is required in evaluating the range of prices used to establish the SSP for standard product support which directly affects the amount of product license revenue recognized using a residual approach. Changes to the product support fee range could have a significant impact on the determination of the SSP for standard product support, impacting the amount and timing of revenues recognized.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls over the Company’s revenue process, including controls over the methodology used to determine the standard product support SSP and controls over the Company’s validation of the underlying data used in the SSP analysis. We assessed the range of prices based on observable inputs the Company used to determine SSP of standard product support by comparing them to the selling prices of standalone renewals for standard product support and evaluating whether the standalone prices were sufficiently clustered within a narrow range.

Evaluation of the carrying value of the liability component of convertible senior notes

As discussed in Notes 2(m) and 9 to the consolidated financial statements, in December 2020, the Company issued $650.0 million aggregate principal amount of 0.750% convertible senior notes in a private offering (the Convertible Notes). The Convertible Notes will mature on December 15, 2025, unless earlier converted, redeemed or repurchased in accordance with their terms. The total net proceeds from the offering, after deducting initial purchaser discounts and issuance costs, were approximately $634.7 million. In accounting for the issuance of the Convertible Notes, the Company separated the Convertible Notes into liability and equity components. The initial carrying amount of the liability component was determined by measuring the fair value of a similar debt instrument without a conversion feature. The excess of the principal amount of the liability component over its carrying amount (the debt discount) and the issuance costs attributable to the liability component are amortized to interest expense over the contractual term of the Convertible Notes using an effective interest rate based on the interest rate of a similar debt instrument without a conversion feature.

We identified the evaluation of the carrying value of the liability component of the Convertible Notes as a critical audit matter. A high degree of auditor judgment was required in assessing the determination of the interest rate that would be available to the Company for a similar debt instrument that does not have a conversion feature. Additionally, minor changes to the interest rate could have a significant effect on the amounts allocated to the liability.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of an internal control over the Company’s process to determine the interest rate that would be available to the Company for a similar debt instrument that does not have a conversion feature. We involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge who assisted in evaluating the Company’s determination of the interest rate by comparing it against a range that was independently developed using publicly available market data for similar debt instruments of comparable entities.


Evaluation of audit evidence pertaining to the existence and control of digital assets

As discussed in Notes 2(g) and 5 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company accounts for its digital assets as indefinite-lived intangible assets. The digital assets are recorded at cost, net of any impairment losses incurred since acquisition. As of December 31, 2020, the Company has $1.054 billion of digital assets, net of $70.7 million of impairment.

We identified the evaluation of audit evidence pertaining to the existence of the digital assets and whether the Company controls the digital assets as a critical audit matter. Subjective auditor judgment was involved in determining the nature and extent of evidence required to assess the existence of the digital assets and whether the Company controls the digital assets, as control over the digital assets is provided through private cryptographic keys stored using third-party custodial services at multiple locations that are geographically dispersed.  In addition, professionals with specialized skills and knowledge in blockchain technology were needed to assist in the evaluation of the sufficiency of certain audit procedures.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls over the digital assets process, including a control over the comparison of the Company’s records of digital assets held to the custodial records. We involved professionals with specialized skills and knowledge in blockchain technology, who assisted in evaluating certain internal controls over the digital assets process performed at the custodial locations, related specifically to the generation of the private cryptographic keys and the storing of these keys. We obtained confirmation of the Company’s digital assets in custody as of December 31, 2020 and compared the total digital assets confirmed to the Company’s record of digital asset holdings. We also compared the Company’s record of digital asset holdings to the records on the public blockchain using a software audit tool. We applied auditor judgment in determining the nature and extent of audit evidence required, especially related to assessing the existence of the digital assets and whether the Company controls the digital assets. We evaluated the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence obtained by assessing the results of procedures performed over the digital assets.

/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2013.

McLean, Virginia

February 7, 2018

12, 2021

 


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

420,244

 

 

$

401,975

 

 

$

59,675

 

 

$

456,727

 

Restricted cash

 

 

938

 

 

 

737

 

 

 

1,084

 

 

 

1,089

 

Short-term investments

 

 

254,927

 

 

 

187,408

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

108,919

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

 

69,500

 

 

 

83,319

 

 

 

197,461

 

 

 

163,516

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

18,002

 

 

 

11,548

 

 

 

14,400

 

 

 

23,195

 

Total current assets

 

 

763,611

 

 

 

684,987

 

 

 

272,620

 

 

 

753,446

 

Digital assets

 

 

1,054,302

 

 

 

0

 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

53,359

 

 

 

57,436

 

 

 

42,975

 

 

 

50,154

 

Capitalized software development costs, net

 

 

2,499

 

 

 

8,497

 

Right-of-use assets

 

 

73,597

 

 

 

85,538

 

Deposits and other assets

 

 

2,868

 

 

 

5,695

 

 

 

15,615

 

 

 

8,024

 

Deferred tax assets, net

 

 

13,391

 

 

 

11,704

 

 

 

6,503

 

 

 

19,409

 

Total assets

 

$

835,728

 

 

$

768,319

 

 

$

1,465,612

 

 

$

916,571

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

$

30,711

 

 

$

36,628

 

Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and operating lease liabilities

 

$

45,119

 

 

$

33,919

 

Accrued compensation and employee benefits

 

 

41,498

 

 

 

43,323

 

 

 

49,249

 

 

 

48,792

 

Deferred revenue and advance payments, net

 

 

112,649

 

 

 

105,535

 

Deferred revenue and advance payments

 

 

191,250

 

 

 

187,107

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

184,858

 

 

 

185,486

 

 

 

285,618

 

 

 

269,818

 

Deferred revenue and advance payments, net

 

 

10,181

 

 

 

13,915

 

Convertible senior notes, net

 

 

486,366

 

 

 

0

 

Deferred revenue and advance payments

 

 

14,662

 

 

 

4,344

 

Operating lease liabilities

 

 

84,328

 

 

 

103,424

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

50,146

 

 

 

16,447

 

 

 

33,382

 

 

 

30,400

 

Deferred tax liabilities

 

 

4

 

 

 

294

 

 

 

8,211

 

 

 

26

 

Total liabilities

 

 

245,189

 

 

 

216,142

 

 

 

912,567

 

 

 

408,012

 

Commitments and Contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock undesignated, $0.001 par value; 5,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Class A common stock, $0.001 par value; 330,000 shares authorized; 15,817 shares issued and 9,412 shares outstanding, and 15,805 shares issued and 9,400 shares outstanding, respectively

 

 

16

 

 

 

16

 

Class B convertible common stock, $0.001 par value; 165,000 shares authorized; 2,035 shares issued and outstanding, and 2,035 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

Preferred stock undesignated, $0.001 par value; 5,000 shares authorized; 0 shares issued or outstanding

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Class A common stock, $0.001 par value; 330,000 shares authorized; 16,307 shares issued and 7,623 shares outstanding, and 15,888 shares issued and 8,081 shares outstanding, respectively

 

 

16

 

 

 

16

 

Class B convertible common stock, $0.001 par value; 165,000 shares authorized; 1,964 shares issued and outstanding, and 2,035 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

559,918

 

 

 

543,974

 

 

 

763,051

 

 

 

593,583

 

Treasury stock, at cost; 6,405 shares

 

 

(475,184

)

 

 

(475,184

)

Treasury stock, at cost; 8,684 shares and 7,807 shares, respectively

 

 

(782,104

)

 

 

(658,880

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(5,968

)

 

 

(10,743

)

 

 

(3,885

)

 

 

(9,651

)

Retained earnings

 

 

511,755

 

 

 

494,112

 

 

 

575,965

 

 

 

583,489

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

590,539

 

 

 

552,177

 

 

 

553,045

 

 

 

508,559

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

835,728

 

 

$

768,319

 

 

$

1,465,612

 

 

$

916,571

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product licenses

 

$

93,969

 

 

$

113,503

 

 

$

119,143

 

 

$

86,743

 

 

$

87,471

 

 

$

88,057

 

Subscription services

 

 

32,368

 

 

 

30,574

 

 

 

27,839

 

 

 

33,082

 

 

 

29,394

 

 

 

29,570

 

Total product licenses and subscription services

 

 

126,337

 

 

 

144,077

 

 

 

146,982

 

 

 

119,825

 

 

 

116,865

 

 

 

117,627

 

Product support

 

 

289,174

 

 

 

285,079

 

 

 

281,740

 

 

 

284,434

 

 

 

292,035

 

 

 

296,216

 

Other services

 

 

89,032

 

 

 

83,005

 

 

 

101,147

 

 

 

76,476

 

 

 

77,427

 

 

 

83,795

 

Total revenues

 

 

504,543

 

 

 

512,161

 

 

 

529,869

 

 

 

480,735

 

 

 

486,327

 

 

 

497,638

 

Cost of revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product licenses

 

 

7,176

 

 

 

8,573

 

 

 

8,118

 

 

 

2,293

 

 

 

2,131

 

 

 

4,864

 

Subscription services

 

 

13,435

 

 

 

12,765

 

 

 

13,051

 

 

 

14,833

 

 

 

15,161

 

 

 

13,620

 

Total product licenses and subscription services

 

 

20,611

 

 

 

21,338

 

 

 

21,169

 

 

 

17,126

 

 

 

17,292

 

 

 

18,484

 

Product support

 

 

17,481

 

 

 

15,001

 

 

 

12,748

 

 

 

23,977

 

 

 

28,317

 

 

 

20,242

 

Other services

 

 

58,557

 

 

 

56,808

 

 

 

67,191

 

 

 

49,952

 

 

 

54,365

 

 

 

60,773

 

Total cost of revenues

 

 

96,649

 

 

 

93,147

 

 

 

101,108

 

 

 

91,055

 

 

 

99,974

 

 

 

99,499

 

Gross profit

 

 

407,894

 

 

 

419,014

 

 

 

428,761

 

 

 

389,680

 

 

 

386,353

 

 

 

398,139

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

174,612

 

 

 

158,740

 

 

 

148,522

 

 

 

148,910

 

 

 

191,235

 

 

 

205,525

 

Research and development

 

 

78,766

 

 

 

73,142

 

 

 

65,206

 

 

 

103,561

 

 

 

109,423

 

 

 

102,499

 

General and administrative

 

 

80,161

 

 

 

79,462

 

 

 

80,732

 

 

 

80,136

 

 

 

86,697

 

 

 

86,134

 

Restructuring costs

 

 

0

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

279

 

Digital asset impairment losses

 

 

70,698

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

333,539

 

 

 

311,389

 

 

 

294,739

 

 

 

403,305

 

 

 

387,355

 

 

 

394,158

 

Income from operations

 

 

74,355

 

 

 

107,625

 

 

 

134,022

 

(Loss) income from operations

 

 

(13,625

)

 

 

(1,002

)

 

 

3,981

 

Interest income, net

 

 

5,205

 

 

 

2,203

 

 

 

284

 

 

 

710

 

 

 

10,909

 

 

 

11,855

 

Other (expense) income, net

 

 

(6,953

)

 

 

3,218

 

 

 

3,558

 

 

 

(7,038

)

 

 

28,356

 

 

 

4,646

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

72,607

 

 

 

113,046

 

 

 

137,864

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

54,964

 

 

 

22,138

 

 

 

31,933

 

Net income

 

 

17,643

 

 

 

90,908

 

 

 

105,931

 

Basic earnings per share (1)

 

$

1.54

 

 

$

7.96

 

 

$

9.33

 

Weighted average shares outstanding used in computing basic earnings per share

 

 

11,444

 

 

 

11,425

 

 

 

11,355

 

Diluted earnings per share (1)

 

$

1.53

 

 

$

7.89

 

 

$

9.18

 

Weighted average shares outstanding used in computing diluted earnings per share

 

 

11,547

 

 

 

11,516

 

 

 

11,539

 

(Loss) income before income taxes

 

 

(19,953

)

 

 

38,263

 

 

 

20,482

 

(Benefit from) provision for income taxes

 

 

(12,429

)

 

 

3,908

 

 

 

(2,019

)

Net (loss) income

 

 

(7,524

)

 

 

34,355

 

 

 

22,501

 

Basic (loss) earnings per share (1)

 

$

(0.78

)

 

$

3.35

 

 

$

1.98

 

Weighted average shares outstanding used in computing basic (loss) earnings per share

 

 

9,684

 

 

 

10,256

 

 

 

11,375

 

Diluted (loss) earnings per share (1)

 

$

(0.78

)

 

$

3.33

 

 

$

1.97

 

Weighted average shares outstanding used in computing diluted (loss) earnings per share

 

 

9,684

 

 

 

10,328

 

 

 

11,412

 

 

(1)

Basic and fully diluted (loss) earnings per share for class A and class B common stock are the same.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

 


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Net income

 

$

17,643

 

 

$

90,908

 

 

$

105,931

 

Other comprehensive gain (loss), net of applicable taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

 

4,805

 

 

 

(3,347

)

 

 

(3,018

)

Less: reclassification adjustment for translation gain included in other income

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

280

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment, net

 

 

4,805

 

 

 

(3,347

)

 

 

(2,738

)

Unrealized (loss) gain on short-term investments

 

 

(30

)

 

 

12

 

 

 

(27

)

Total other comprehensive gain (loss)

 

 

4,775

 

 

 

(3,335

)

 

 

(2,765

)

Comprehensive income

 

$

22,418

 

 

$

87,573

 

 

$

103,166

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(7,524

)

 

$

34,355

 

 

$

22,501

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of applicable taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

 

5,913

 

 

 

(11

)

 

 

(4,128

)

Unrealized (loss) gain on short-term investments

 

 

(147

)

 

 

577

 

 

 

(430

)

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

5,766

 

 

 

566

 

 

 

(4,558

)

Comprehensive (loss) income

 

$

(1,758

)

 

$

34,921

 

 

$

17,943

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

 


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class B

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class B

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class A

 

 

Convertible

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class A

 

 

Convertible

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

Paid-in

 

 

Treasury Stock

 

 

Comprehensive

 

 

Retained

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

Paid-in

 

 

Treasury Stock

 

 

Comprehensive

 

 

Retained

 

 

Total

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Capital

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Income (Loss)

 

 

Earnings

 

 

Total

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Capital

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Income (Loss)

 

 

Earnings

 

Balance at January 1, 2015

 

$

324,471

 

 

 

15,660

 

 

$

16

 

 

 

2,055

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

506,727

 

 

 

(6,405

)

 

$

(475,184

)

 

$

(4,363

)

 

$

297,273

 

Net income

 

 

105,931

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

105,931

 

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

(2,765

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(2,765

)

 

 

0

 

Translation gain reclassified to other income

 

 

(280

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(280

)

 

 

0

 

Conversion of class B to class A common stock

 

 

0

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(20

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Issuance of class A common stock under stock option plans

 

 

9,529

 

 

 

91

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

9,529

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Tax effect of stock option exercises

 

 

1,096

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,096

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Share-based compensation expense

 

 

17,299

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

17,299

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

$

455,281

 

 

 

15,771

 

 

$

16

 

 

 

2,035

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

534,651

 

 

 

(6,405

)

 

$

(475,184

)

 

$

(7,408

)

 

$

403,204

 

Balance at January 1, 2018

 

$

605,726

 

 

 

15,817

 

 

$

16

 

 

 

2,035

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

559,918

 

 

 

(6,405

)

 

$

(475,184

)

 

$

(5,659

)

 

$

526,633

 

Net income

 

 

90,908

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

90,908

 

 

 

22,501

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

22,501

 

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

(3,335

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(3,335

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

(4,558

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(4,558

)

 

 

0

 

Issuance of class A common stock under stock option plans

 

 

1,663

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,663

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

2,471

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

2,471

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Tax effect of stock option exercises

 

 

1,244

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,244

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Purchases of treasury stock

 

 

(110,977

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(880

)

 

 

(110,977

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Share-based compensation expense

 

 

11,817

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

11,817

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

14,568

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

14,568

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Payment of taxes relating to net exercise of employee stock options

 

 

(3,739

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(3,739

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Write-off of deferred tax assets relating to vested employee stock options that are no longer exercisable

 

 

(1,662

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(1,662

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

$

552,177

 

 

 

15,805

 

 

$

16

 

 

 

2,035

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

543,974

 

 

 

(6,405

)

 

$

(475,184

)

 

$

(10,743

)

 

$

494,112

 

Balance at December 31, 2018

 

$

529,731

 

 

 

15,837

 

 

$

16

 

 

 

2,035

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

576,957

 

 

 

(7,285

)

 

$

(586,161

)

 

$

(10,217

)

 

$

549,134

 

Net income

 

 

17,643

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

17,643

 

 

 

34,355

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

34,355

 

Other comprehensive gain

 

 

4,775

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

4,775

 

 

 

0

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

566

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

566

 

 

 

0

 

Issuance of class A common stock under stock option plans

 

 

1,677

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,677

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

6,569

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

6,569

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Purchases of treasury stock

 

 

(72,719

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(522

)

 

 

(72,719

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Share-based compensation expense

 

 

14,267

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

14,267

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

10,057

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

10,057

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Balance at December 31, 2017

 

$

590,539

 

 

 

15,817

 

 

$

16

 

 

 

2,035

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

559,918

 

 

 

(6,405

)

 

$

(475,184

)

 

$

(5,968

)

 

$

511,755

 

Balance at December 31, 2019

 

$

508,559

 

 

 

15,888

 

 

$

16

 

 

 

2,035

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

593,583

 

 

 

(7,807

)

 

$

(658,880

)

 

$

(9,651

)

 

$

583,489

 

Net loss

 

 

(7,524

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(7,524

)

Other comprehensive income

 

 

5,766

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

5,766

 

 

 

0

 

Conversion of class B to class A common stock

 

 

0

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(71

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Issuance of class A common stock under stock option plans

 

 

51,082

 

 

 

348

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

51,082

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Purchases of treasury stock

 

 

(123,224

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(877

)

 

 

(123,224

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Share-based compensation expense

 

 

10,576

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

10,576

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Equity component of convertible senior notes, net of issuance cost and deferred tax liability

 

 

107,810

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

107,810

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Balance at December 31, 2020

 

$

553,045

 

 

 

16,307

 

 

$

16

 

 

 

1,964

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

763,051

 

 

 

(8,684

)

 

$

(782,104

)

 

$

(3,885

)

 

$

575,965

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

 


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

17,643

 

 

$

90,908

 

 

$

105,931

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(7,524

)

 

$

34,355

 

 

$

22,501

 

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

12,572

 

 

 

17,195

 

 

 

21,214

 

 

 

13,332

 

 

 

8,594

 

 

 

3,701

 

Bad debt expense

 

 

2,269

 

 

 

224

 

 

 

884

 

Unrealized net loss on foreign currency forward contracts

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,641

 

Non-cash restructuring costs and adjustments

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(136

)

Reduction in carrying amount of right-of-use assets

 

 

8,210

 

 

 

8,105

 

 

 

0

 

Credit losses and sales allowances

 

 

2,732

 

 

 

124

 

 

 

1,912

 

Net realized (gain) loss on short-term investments

 

 

(94

)

 

 

41

 

 

 

153

 

Deferred taxes

 

 

(2,011

)

 

 

(4,983

)

 

 

9,666

 

 

 

(20,830

)

 

 

(2,614

)

 

 

(8,274

)

Release of liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits

 

 

0

 

 

 

(394

)

 

 

(899

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

(2,837

)

 

 

0

 

Share-based compensation expense

 

 

14,267

 

 

 

11,817

 

 

 

17,299

 

 

 

11,153

 

 

 

10,209

 

 

 

14,636

 

Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements

 

 

0

 

 

 

(1,244

)

 

 

(1,096

)

Reclassification of foreign currency translation adjustment from other comprehensive income

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(280

)

Digital asset impairment losses

 

 

70,698

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Gain on partial lease termination

 

 

(2,820

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs on convertible senior notes

 

 

1,543

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

15,348

 

 

 

(16,878

)

 

 

5,003

 

 

 

(774

)

 

 

(3,672

)

 

 

(8,357

)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

(4,279

)

 

 

(880

)

 

 

4,446

 

 

 

2,346

 

 

 

6,415

 

 

 

(6,561

)

Deposits and other assets

 

 

2,981

 

 

 

(4,059

)

 

 

1,631

 

 

 

416

 

 

 

761

 

 

 

(1,201

)

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

 

(9,093

)

 

 

6,981

 

 

 

1,904

 

 

 

9,445

 

 

 

(7,321

)

 

 

3,378

 

Accrued compensation and employee benefits

 

 

(3,683

)

 

 

3,787

 

 

 

(8,387

)

 

 

(6,827

)

 

 

(2,658

)

 

 

5,116

 

Accrued restructuring costs

 

 

0

 

 

 

(58

)

 

 

(1,922

)

Deferred revenue and advance payments, net

 

 

(1,609

)

 

 

11,238

 

 

 

(4,176

)

Deferred revenue and advance payments

 

 

(20,223

)

 

 

20,836

 

 

 

(22,126

)

Operating lease liabilities

 

 

(11,171

)

 

 

(8,620

)

 

 

0

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

33,917

 

 

 

(3,065

)

 

 

(3,024

)

 

 

4,007

 

 

 

(851

)

 

 

5,749

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

78,322

 

 

 

110,589

 

 

 

149,699

 

 

 

53,619

 

 

 

60,867

 

 

 

10,627

 

Investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of digital assets

 

 

(1,125,000

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Proceeds from redemption of short-term investments

 

 

390,720

 

 

 

361,680

 

 

 

479,200

 

 

 

119,886

 

 

 

684,356

 

 

 

491,800

 

Purchases of property and equipment

 

 

(3,982

)

 

 

(2,337

)

 

 

(3,484

)

 

 

(3,651

)

 

 

(10,182

)

 

 

(6,846

)

Purchases of short-term investments

 

 

(456,468

)

 

 

(354,999

)

 

 

(473,779

)

 

 

(9,928

)

 

 

(320,487

)

 

 

(694,018

)

Capitalized software development costs

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(9,598

)

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 

 

(69,730

)

 

 

4,344

 

 

 

(7,661

)

 

 

(1,018,693

)

 

 

353,687

 

 

 

(209,064

)

Financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from convertible senior notes classified as debt

 

 

496,473

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Proceeds from convertible senior notes classified as equity

 

 

153,527

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Issuance costs paid for convertible senior notes

 

 

(14,625

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Proceeds from sale of class A common stock under exercise of employee stock options

 

 

1,677

 

 

 

1,663

 

 

 

9,529

 

 

 

51,082

 

 

 

6,569

 

 

 

2,471

 

Payment of taxes relating to net exercise of employee stock options

 

 

0

 

 

 

(3,739

)

 

 

0

 

Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,244

 

 

 

1,096

 

Payments on capital lease obligations and other financing arrangements

 

 

(21

)

 

 

(172

)

 

 

(1,447

)

Purchases of treasury stock

 

 

(123,224

)

 

 

(72,719

)

 

 

(110,977

)

Payments on capital lease obligations and other financing arrangements prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-02

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(9

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 

1,656

 

 

 

(1,004

)

 

 

9,178

 

 

 

563,233

 

 

 

(66,150

)

 

 

(108,515

)

Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

 

 

8,222

 

 

 

(4,176

)

 

 

(5,837

)

 

 

4,784

 

 

 

(1,374

)

 

 

(3,444

)

Net increase in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

 

 

18,470

 

 

 

109,753

 

 

 

145,379

 

Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

 

 

(397,057

)

 

 

347,030

 

 

 

(310,396

)

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, beginning of year

 

 

402,712

 

 

 

292,959

 

 

 

147,580

 

 

 

457,816

 

 

 

110,786

 

 

 

421,182

 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, end of year

 

$

421,182

 

 

$

402,712

 

 

$

292,959

 

 

$

60,759

 

 

$

457,816

 

 

$

110,786

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid during the year for interest

 

$

0

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

34

 

Cash paid during the year for income taxes, net of tax refunds

 

$

29,279

 

 

$

24,332

 

 

$

13,346

 

 

$

6,803

 

 

$

5,911

 

 

$

13,214

 

Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets acquired under capital lease obligations and other financing arrangements

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

14

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

(1) Organization

MicroStrategy pursues two corporate strategies in the operation of its business. One strategy is a worldwide provider ofto grow our enterprise analytics software business and mobility software. The Company’s missionthe other strategy is to provide enterprise customers with world-class softwareacquire and expert services so they can deploy unique intelligence applications.hold bitcoin.

 

 

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(a) Basis of Presentation

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries.  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Certain amounts in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2019 have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.  In particular, reductions in the carrying amount of right-of-use (“ROU”) assets have been reclassified from “Depreciation and amortization” to “Reduction in carrying amount of right-of-use assets” in operating activities.

As discussed in Note 3, Recent Accounting Standards, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, and its subsequent amendments (“ASU 2016-182016-13”), effective January 1, 20172020.  Comparative prior period Consolidated Financial Statements have not been restated for ASU 2016-13.

In addition, the Company previously adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) and has retroactively applied the required updates to its Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for all periods presented. As a result of the adoption of subsequent amendments (“ASU 2016-18, changes in restricted cash have been removed2016-02”) effective January 1, 2019, and Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from investing activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; instead, restricted cash has been includedContracts with total cashCustomers (Topic 606) and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning and end of period amounts.its subsequent amendments (“ASU 2014-09”) effective January 1, 2018.

(b) Use of Estimates

The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America,GAAP, requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including, but not limited to, those related to revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts, investments, derivative financial instruments, software development costs, fixed assets, intangibledigital assets, variable compensation,leases, debt, share-based compensation, income taxes, including the carrying value of deferred tax assets, and litigation and contingencies, including liabilities that the Company deems not probable of assertion. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets, liabilities, and equity that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results and outcomes could differ from these estimates and assumptions.

(c) Fair Value Measurements

The Company measures certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis.  Fair value is defined as the price that is expected to be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  The Company uses a three-level hierarchy that prioritizes fair value measurements based on the types of inputs used for the various valuation techniques.  The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

 

Level 1:

Quoted (unadjusted) prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

 

Level 2:

Inputs other than quoted prices that are either directly or indirectly observable, such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

76


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Level 3:

Inputs that are generally unobservable, supported by little or no market activity, and typically reflect management’s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

80


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The categorization of an asset or liability within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  The valuation techniques used by the Company when measuring fair value maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

The Company also estimates the fair value of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and accrued compensation and employee benefits.  The Company considers the carrying value of these instruments in the financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements to approximate fair value due to their short maturities.

(d) Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

Cash equivalents may include bank demand deposits, money market instruments, certificates of deposit, U.S. Treasury securities, and equivalent funds. The Company generally considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Restricted cash consists of cash balances restricted in use by contractual obligations with third parties.

(e) Short-term Investments

The Company has periodically investsinvested a portion of its excess cash in short-term investment instruments.  All highly liquid investments with stated maturity dates between three months and one year from the purchase date are classified as short-term investments. The Company determines the appropriate classification of its short-term investments at the time of purchase.purchase and reassesses the appropriateness of the classification at each reporting date.  

SubstantiallyPrior to their liquidation, all of the Company’s short-term investments arewere in U.S. Treasury securities and certificates of deposit, and the Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments to maturity. Therefore, thesesecurities.  All short-term investments arehave been classified and accounted for as held-to-maturityavailable-for-sale and are reported at fair value within “Short-term investments” on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of the Company’s short-term investments is determined based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical securities (Level 1 inputs).  Premiums and discounts related to the Company’s short-term investments are amortized cost.over the life of the investment and recorded in earnings.  Each reporting period, the Company determines whether a decline in fair value below the amortized cost foramount of unrealized holding gains and losses on each individual security is other-than-temporaryby comparing the fair value to the amortized cost.  Unrealized holding gains and if it would be required to sellunrealized holding losses that are not a result of a credit loss are reported in other comprehensive income (loss) until realized.  Beginning January 1, 2020, unrealized holding losses that are a result of a credit loss are recorded in earnings, with the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. Upon recognitionestablishment of an other-than-temporary impairment,allowance for credit losses. As of December 31, 2020, the previous amortized cost basis less the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings becomes the new amortized cost basis of the investment.Company did 0t hold any short-term investments.

(f) Derivative Financial InstrumentsCredit Losses on Accounts Receivable

The Company is exposed to certain risks related tomaintains an allowance for credit losses on its ongoing business operations, includingaccounts receivable balances, which represents its best estimate of current expected credit losses over the effectcontractual life of changes in foreign exchange ratesthe accounts receivable.  Beginning January 1, 2020, when evaluating the adequacy of its allowance for credit losses each reporting period, the Company analyzes accounts receivable balances with similar risk characteristics on a collective basis, considering factors such as the Company’s monetary assetsaging of receivable balances, payment terms, geographic location, historical loss experience, current information, and liabilities denominated in foreign currency.  Thefuture expectations.  Each reporting period, the Company may use foreign currency forward contractsreassesses whether any accounts receivable no longer share similar risk characteristics and should instead be evaluated as part of its strategyanother pool or on an individual basis. Changes to manage these risks, but does not hold or issue derivative instrumentsthe allowance for trading purposes or speculation.credit losses are adjusted through credit loss expense, which is presented within “General and administrative” operating expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

77


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(g) Digital Assets

During the second half of 2020, the Company purchased an aggregate of $1.125 billion in digital assets, comprised solely of bitcoin.  The Company executes these instrumentsaccounts for its digital assets as indefinite-lived intangible assets in accordance with financial institutionsAccounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other. The Company has ownership of and control over its bitcoin and uses third-party custodial services at multiple locations that hold an investment grade credit rating.  These foreign currency forward contracts do not meet the requirements for hedge accounting and are geographically dispersed to store its bitcoin. The Company’s digital assets are initially recorded on the balance sheet as either an asset or liabilityat cost. Subsequently, they are measured at their fair value ascost, net of the reporting date.  Changes inany impairment losses incurred since acquisition.

The Company determines the fair value of derivative instruments, as measured usingits bitcoin on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, based on quoted (unadjusted) prices on the three-level hierarchy described above,active exchange that the Company has determined is its principal market for bitcoin (Level 1 inputs).  The Company performs an analysis each quarter to identify whether events or changes in circumstances, principally decreases in the quoted (unadjusted) prices on the active exchange, indicate that it is more likely than not that any of the assets are impaired.  In determining if an impairment has occurred, the Company considers the lowest price of one bitcoin quoted on the active exchange at any time since acquiring the specific bitcoin held by the Company. If the carrying value of a bitcoin exceeds that lowest price, an impairment loss has occurred with respect to that bitcoin in the amount equal to the difference between its carrying value and such lowest price.  

Impairment losses are recognized in “Other (expense) income, net”as “Digital asset impairment losses” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations in the period in which the impairment is identified. The impaired digital assets are written down to their fair value at the time of impairment and this new cost basis will not be adjusted upward for any subsequent increase in fair value. Gains (if any) are not recorded until realized upon sale, at which point they would be presented net of any impairment losses in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.  In determining the gain to be recognized upon sale, the Company calculates the difference between the sales price and carrying value of the specific bitcoins sold immediately prior to sale.

(g)

See Note 5, Digital Assets, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the Company’s purchases of digital assets.

(h) Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation.  Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, as follows: three years for computer equipment and purchased software; five years for office equipment and automobiles; and tenequipment; 10 years for office furniturefurniture; and owned19 years for the Company’s corporate aircraft, which has an estimated salvage value of 70%21%.  Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the improvements or the term of the lease, whichever is shorter.  The Company periodically evaluates the appropriateness of the estimated useful lives and salvage value of all property and equipment.  Any change in the estimated useful life or salvage value is treated as a change in estimate and accounted for prospectively in the period of change.

81


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred, except for certain costs related to the aircraft.  The costs of normal, recurring, or periodic repairs and maintenance activities related to the aircraft are expensed as incurred.  The cost of planned major maintenance activities (“PMMA”) may be treated differently because those activities may involve the acquisition of additional aircraft components or the replacement of existing aircraft components.  PMMA are performed periodically based on passage of time and the use of the aircraft.  The classification of a maintenance activity as part of PMMA requires judgment and can affect the amount of expense recognized in any particular period.  The cost of each PMMA is expected to be capitalized and amortized over the period until the next scheduled PMMA.  There have been no PMMA to date.

When assets are retired or sold, the capitalized cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the property and equipment accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in the results of operations.

78


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Eligible internal-use software development costs are capitalized subsequent to the completion of the preliminary project stage. Such costs include external direct material and service costs, employee payroll, and payroll-related costs. After all substantial testing and deployment is completed and the software is ready for its intended use, capitalization ceases and internal-use software development costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the software, generally three years.

The Company reviews long-lived assets including intangible assets, for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be fully recoverable or that the useful lives of these assets are no longer appropriate.  Each impairment test is based on a comparison of the undiscounted cash flows to the recorded value of the asset.  If an asset is impaired, the asset is written down by the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds the related fair value of the asset.

(h)(i) Leases

The Company adopted ASU 2016-02 effective as of January 1, 2019.  Under ASU 2016-02, a lease is a contract, or part of a contract, that conveys the right to both (i) obtain economic benefits from and (ii) direct the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.  The Company evaluates its contracts to determine if they contain a lease and classifies any lease components identified as an operating or finance lease.  For each lease component, the Company recognizes a right-of-use (“ROU”) asset and a lease liability.  ROU assets and lease liabilities are presented separately for operating and finance leases; however, the Company currently has no material finance leases.  The Company’s operating leases are primarily related to office space in the United States and foreign locations.

In a contract that contains a lease, a component is an item or activity that transfers a good or service to the lessee.  Such contracts may be comprised of lease components, non-lease components, and elements that are not components.  Each lease component represents a lessee’s right to use an underlying asset in the contract if the lessee can benefit from the right of use of the asset either on its own or together with other readily available resources and if the right of use is neither highly dependent nor highly interrelated with other rights of use. Non-lease components include items such as common area maintenance and utilities provided by the lessor.  The Company has elected the practical expedient to not separate lease components from non-lease components for office space, which is the Company’s only material underlying asset class.  For each lease within this asset class, the non-lease components and related lease components are accounted for as a single lease component.  Items or activities that do not transfer goods or services to the lessee, such as administrative tasks to set up the contract and reimbursement or payment of lessor costs, are not components of the contract and therefore no contract consideration is allocated to such items or activities.

Consideration in the contract is comprised of any fixed payments and variable payments that depend on an index or rate. Payments in the Company’s operating lease arrangements are typically comprised of base office rent and parking fees.  Costs related to the Company’s non-lease components, as described above, are generally variable and do not depend on an index or rate and are therefore excluded from the contract consideration allocated to the lease components.  The Company’s operating lease arrangements generally do not contain any payments related to items or activities that are not components.

Operating lease liabilities are initially and subsequently measured at the present value of unpaid lease payments, discounted at the discount rate of the lease.  Operating lease ROU assets are initially measured as the sum of the initial lease liability, any initial direct costs incurred, and any prepaid lease payments, less any lease incentives received.  The ROU asset is amortized over the term of the lease. The amortization of operating lease ROU assets is included in “Reduction in carrying amount of right-of-use assets” within the operating activities section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. A single lease expense is recorded within operating expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Variable lease payments that are not included in the measurement of the lease liability are recognized in the period when the obligations for those payments are incurred. In the Company’s lease agreements, these variable payments typically include certain taxes, utilities, and maintenance costs, and other fees.

79


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company uses its incremental borrowing rate as the discount rate for all of its leases, as the rate implicit in the lease is not readily determinable in any of its lease contracts. In order to estimate a collateralized borrowing rate curve, the Company first estimates a synthetic credit rating and then applies modeling methodologies to an unsecured borrowing rate curve. In determining the incremental borrowing rate of each lease, the Company uses a centralized treasury approach and considers the currency of the contract, the economic environment in which the lease exists, and the term of the lease.

The Company does not recognize lease liabilities or ROU assets for any short-term leases with a non-cancellable lease term of 12 months or less. Instead, the lease payments for these short-term leases are expensed on a straight-line basis over the lease term, and any variable payments are recognized in the period when the obligations for those payments are incurred.  The Company believes that, using this methodology, the expense recorded reasonably reflects the Company’s short-term lease commitments.

(j) Software Development Costs

SoftwareThe Company did 0t capitalize any software development costs during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018.  Due to the pace of the Company’s software development efforts and frequency of its software releases, the Company’s software development costs are expensed as incurred within “Research and development” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.  Amortization expenses related to previously capitalized software development costs were $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.  NaN amortization expense was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, as all previously capitalized software development costs were fully amortized.

In previous periods, software development costs were expensed as incurred until technological feasibility hashad been established, at which time such costs arewere capitalized until the product issoftware was available for general release to customers. Capitalized software development costs includeincluded direct labor costs and fringe benefit costs attributed to programmers, software engineers, and quality control and field certifiers working on productsthe software after they reachit reached technological feasibility, but before they areit was generally available to customers for sale.  Technological feasibility iswas considered to be achieved when a productsoftware design and working model of the software product havehad been completed.  Capitalized software development costs arewere typically amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated productsoftware life of three years, on a straight-line basis.years.  The Company has significantly accelerated the pace of its software development efforts and increased the frequency of its software releases subsequent to the release of MicroStrategy 10, which has resulted in the Company’s software development costs in recent periods being expensed as incurred.

Capitalized software development costs, net of accumulated amortization were $2.5 million and $8.5 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  Amortization expense related to software development costs was $6.0 million, $7.4 million, and $7.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, and is included inrecorded within cost of product licenses and subscription services revenues.  The Company did not capitalize any software development costs duringrevenues in the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company capitalized software development costsConsolidated Statements of $9.6 million.  The Company analyzes the net realizable value of capitalized software development costs on at least an annual basis and has determined that there is no indication of impairment of the capitalized software development costs as forecasted future sales are adequate to support amortization costs.Operations.  

(i)(k) Loss Contingencies and Legal Costs

The Company accrues loss contingencies that are believed to be probable and can be reasonably estimated.  As events evolve during the administration and litigation process and additional information becomes known, the Company reassesses its estimates related to loss contingencies.  Legal costs are expensed in the period in which the costs are incurred.

(l) Deferred Revenue and Advance Payments

Deferred revenue and advance payments represent amounts received or due from customers in advance of the Company transferring its software or services to the customer under an enforceable contract. In the case of multi-year service contracts, the Company generally does not invoice more than one year in advance of services and does not record deferred revenue for amounts that have not been invoiced and that require an additional contract.  Revenue is subsequently recognized in the period(s) in which control of the software or services is transferred to the customer. Deferred revenue is comprised of deferred product licenses and subscription services, product support, or other services revenue based on the transaction price allocated to the specific performance obligation in the contract with the customer.

80


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(m) Convertible Debt Arrangement

As discussed in Note 9, Convertible Senior Notes, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company issued convertible senior notes in December 2020.  As the notes contain conversion features, the Company must separate the debt and equity components of the notes. The carrying amount of the liability component is determined by measuring the fair value of a similar debt instrument without any associated conversion features at the time of issuance and the carrying amount of the equity component is determined by deducting the fair value of the liability component from the initial proceeds of the notes. The Company also allocates issuance costs associated with the offering between debt and equity based on their relative carrying values at the time of issuance. Such issuance costs are taken as a direct reduction to the debt and equity components.  Both the difference between the principal and the liability component’s initial carrying value and the issuance costs allocated to the debt component are amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the expected term of the notes.

In determining the fair value of a similar debt instrument without any associated conversion features, the Company estimated a nonconvertible debt borrowing rate at the time of issuance using a blend of different methodologies, which considered Level 2 inputs such as observable market prices of the Company’s debt and class A common stock, the Company’s historical and implied class A common stock volatility, a synthetic credit rating consistent with that utilized for determining the incremental borrowing rate for the Company’s accounting of leasing arrangements, and analysis of similar convertible debt issuances and their equivalent nonconvertible debt yields.  

(n) Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue using a five-step model:

(i)

Identifying the contract(s) with a customer,

(ii)

Identifying the performance obligation(s),

(iii)

Determining the transaction price,

(iv)

Allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and

(v)

Recognizing revenue when, or as, the Company satisfies a performance obligation.

The Company has elected to exclude taxes assessed by government authorities in determining the transaction price, and therefore revenue is recognized net of taxes collected from customers.

Performance Obligations and Timing of Revenue Recognition

The Company primarily sells goods and services that fall into the categories discussed below. Each category contains one or more performance obligations that are either (i) capable of being distinct (i.e., the customer can benefit from the good or service on its own or together with readily available resources, including those purchased separately from the Company) and distinct within the context of the contract (i.e., separately identifiable from other promises in the contract) or (ii) a series of distinct goods or services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer to the customer.  Aside from the Company’s term and perpetual product licenses, which are delivered at a point in time, the majority of the Company’s services are delivered over time.

Product Licenses

The Company sells different types of business intelligence software, licensed on a term or perpetual basis and installed either on premises or on a public cloud that is procured and managed by the customer.  Although product licenses are sold with product support, the software is fully functional at the outset of the arrangement and is considered a distinct performance obligation.  Revenue from product license sales is recognized when control of the license is transferred to the customer, which is the later of delivery or commencement of the license term.  The Company may also sell through resellers and OEMs who purchase the Company’s software for resale.  In reseller arrangements, revenue is recognized when control of the license is transferred to the end user.  In OEM arrangements, revenue is recognized when control of the license is transferred to the OEM.

81


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Subscription Services

The Company also sells access to its software through MCE, a cloud subscription service, wherein customers access the software through a cloud environment that the Company manages on behalf of the customer. Control of the software itself does not transfer to the customer under this arrangement and is not considered a separate performance obligation.  Cloud subscriptions are regularly sold on a standalone basis and include technical support, monitoring, backups, updates, and quarterly service reviews.Revenue related to cloud subscriptions is recognized on a straight-line basis over the contract period, which is the period over which the customer has continuous access to the software.

Product Support

In all product license transactions, customers are required to purchase a standard product support package and may also purchase a premium product support package for a fixed annual fee.  All product support packages include both technical support and when-and-if-available software upgrades, which are treated as a single performance obligation as they are considered a series of distinct services that are substantially the same and have the same duration and measure of progress.  Revenue from product support is recognized on a straight-line basis over the contract period, which is the period over which the customer has continuous access to product support.

Consulting Services

The Company sells consulting services to help customers plan and execute deployment of the Company’s software.  Customers are not required to use consulting services to fully benefit from the software.  Consulting services are regularly sold on a standalone basis and either (i) prepaid upfront or (ii) sold on a time and materials basis.  Consulting arrangements are each considered separate performance obligations because they do not integrate with each other or with other offerings to deliver a combined output to the customer, do not modify or customize (or are not modified or customized by) each other or other offerings, and do not affect the customer’s ability to use the other consulting services or the Company’s other offerings.  Revenue under consulting arrangements is recognized over time as services are delivered.  For time and materials-based consulting arrangements, the Company has elected the practical expedient of recognizing revenue upon invoicing since the invoiced amount corresponds directly to the value of the Company’s service to date.  

Education Services

The Company sells various education and training services to its customers. Education services are sold on a standalone basis under two different types of arrangements: (i) annual subscriptions to live and on-demand training courses and (ii) custom courses purchased on an hourly basis.  Education arrangements are each considered separate performance obligations because they do not integrate with each other or with other offerings to deliver a combined output to the customer, do not modify or customize (or are not modified or customized by) each other or other offerings, and do not affect the customer’s ability to use the other education services or the Company’s other offerings. Revenue on annual subscriptions is recognized on a straight-line basis over the contract period, which is the period over which the customer has continuous access to the training courses. Revenue on custom courses is recognized on a time and materials basis as the services are delivered.

See Note 16, Segment Information, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding total revenues by geographic region.

Estimates and Judgments

The Company makes estimates and judgments to allocate the transaction price based on an observable or estimated SSP. The Company also makes estimates and judgements with respect to capitalizing incremental costs to obtain a customer contract and determining the subsequent amortization period. These estimates and judgments are discussed further below.

82


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

(j) Deferred RevenueDetermining the Transaction Price

The transaction price includes both fixed and Advance Payments

Deferred revenue and advance payments related to product support, subscription services, and other services result from payments received priorvariable consideration. Variable consideration is included in the transaction price to the performanceextent it is probable that a significant reversal will not occur.  The amount of servicesvariable consideration excluded from the transaction price was not material for technical support, subscription, consulting,the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and education. Deferred revenue2018. The Company’s estimates of variable consideration are also subject to subsequent true-up adjustments and advance payments relatedmay result in changes to product licenses result primarily from multiple-element arrangements that include future deliverables. Deferred revenue is comprised of deferred product licensesits transaction prices.  Such true-up adjustments have not been and subscription services, deferred product support, or other services revenue based on the objective fair value of the multiple elements of the arrangement, except for software licenses for which the Company doesare not have an objective measure of fair value.expected to be material.  The Company offsets its accounts receivable and deferred revenue for any billed and unpaid items included in deferred revenue and advance payments.has the following sources of variable consideration:

(k) Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue from sales of software licenses to end users upon:

 

1)(i)

persuasive evidence of an arrangement, as provided by agreements, contracts, purchase orders, or otherPerformance penalties – Subscription services and product support arrangements generally executed bycontain performance response time guarantees. For subscription services arrangements, the Company estimates variable consideration using a portfolio approach because performance penalties are tied to standard up-time requirements.  For product support arrangements, the Company estimates variable consideration on a contract basis because such arrangements are customer-specific.  For both parties;subscription services and product support arrangements, the Company uses an expected value approach to estimate variable consideration based on historical business practices and current and future performance expectations to determine the likelihood of incurring penalties.

 

2)(ii)

existenceExtended payment terms – The Company’s standard payment terms are generally within 180 days of invoicing. If extended payment terms are granted to customers, those terms generally do not exceed one year. For contracts with extended payment terms, the Company estimates variable consideration on a fixed or determinable fee;contract basis because such estimates are customer-specific and uses an expected value approach to analyze historical business experience on a customer-by-customer basis to determine the likelihood that extended payment terms lead to an implied price concession.

 

3)(iii)

delivery ofSales and usage-based royalties – Certain product license arrangements include sales or usage-based royalties, covering both product license and product support.  In these arrangements, the software;Company uses an expected value approach to estimate and recognize revenue for royalty sales each period, utilizing historical data on a contract-by-contract basis.  True-up adjustments are recorded in subsequent periods when royalty reporting is received from the OEMs.  

The Company provides a standard software assurance warranty to repair, replace, or refund software that does not perform in accordance with documentation. The standard software assurance warranty period is generally less than one year.  Assurance warranty claims were not material for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018.

The Company does not adjust the transaction price for significant financing components where the time period between cash payment and performance is one year or less.  However, there are circumstances where the timing between cash payment and performance may exceed one year.  These circumstances generally involve prepaid multi-year product support and subscription services arrangements where the customer determines when the service is utilized (e.g., when to request on-call support services or when to use and access the software in the cloud).  In these circumstances, the Company has determined no significant financing component exists because the customer controls when to utilize the service and because there are significant business purposes behind the timing difference between payment and performance (e.g., maximizing profit in the case of product support services and ensuring collectability in the case of subscription services).

Allocating the Transaction Price Based on Standalone Selling Prices (SSP)

The Company allocates the transaction price to each performance obligation in a contract based on its relative SSP.  The SSP is the price, or estimated price, of the software or service when sold on a standalone basis at contract inception.  In circumstances where SSP is not directly observable, the Company estimates SSP using the following methodologies:

 

4)(i)

determinationProduct licenses – Product licenses are not sold on a standalone basis and pricing is highly variable.  The Company establishes SSP of product licenses using a residual approach after first establishing the SSP of standard product support.  Standard product support is sold on a standalone basis within a narrow range of the stated net license fee, and because an economic relationship exists between product licenses and standard product support, the Company has concluded that collectionthe residual method to estimate SSP of product licenses sold on both a perpetual and term basis is reasonably assured.a fair allocation of the transaction price.

When the fees for software upgrades and enhancements, technical support, consulting, and education are bundled with the license fee, they are unbundled for revenue recognition purposes, using vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value of the elements.

Product support or post-contract support (“PCS”) revenue is derived from providing technical software support and software updates and upgrades to customers. PCS revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the contract, which in most cases is one year.  The Company’s VSOE for PCS, which includes updates, upgrades, and enhancements, is determined based on the optional stated renewal fee for PCS in the contract, which is the price the customer is required to pay when PCS is renewed.  Additionally, the optional stated renewal fee used to establish VSOE for PCS in a software transaction must be above the Company’s minimum substantive VSOE rate for PCS.  If a stated renewal rate is considered non-substantive, VSOE of PCS has not been established and the Company recognizes all revenue under the arrangement ratably over the PCS period.  A minimum substantive VSOE rate is determined based on an analysis of historical sales of PCS.  For a renewal rate to be non-substantive, the Company believes it must be significantly lower than its minimum VSOE rate. The Company considers a 10% variance below its minimum VSOE rate to be significant. It is rare for the Company to have an arrangement that includes a renewal rate that is below the minimum VSOE rate.

Revenue from consulting, education, and subscription services is recognized as the services are performed.  The Company’s VSOE for services other than PCS is determined based on an analysis of its historical sales of each element when sold separately from software.

For new offerings of services other than PCS or service offerings that have not had a sufficient history of sales activity, the Company initially establishes VSOE based on the list price as determined by management with the relevant authority.  Each service offering has a single list price in each country where sold.

If VSOE exists for all undelivered elements and there is no such evidence of fair value established for delivered elements, the arrangement fee is first allocated to the elements where evidence of fair value has been established and the residual amount is allocated to the delivered elements. If evidence of fair value for any undelivered element of an arrangement does not exist, all revenue from the arrangement is deferred until such time that evidence of fair value exists for undelivered elements or until all elements of the arrangement are delivered, subject to certain limited exceptions.

83


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

(ii)

Subscription services – Given the highly variable selling price of subscription services, the Company establishes the SSP of its subscription services arrangements using a similar residual approach after first establishing the SSP of consulting and education services to the extent they are included in the arrangement. The Company has concluded that the residual method to estimate SSP of its subscription services is a fair allocation of the transaction price.

(iii)

Standard product support – The Company establishes SSP of standard product support as a percentage of the stated net license fee, given such pricing is consistent with its normal pricing practices and there exists sufficient history of customers renewing standard product support on a standalone basis at similar percentages.  Semi-annually, the Company tracks renewal rates negotiated when standard product support is initially sold with a perpetual license in order to determine the SSP of standard product support within each geographic region for the upcoming quarter. If the stated standard product support fee falls within the SSP range, the specific rate in the contract will be used to determine SSP. If the stated fee is above or below SSP, the highest or lowest end of the range, respectively, will generally be used to determine SSP of standard product support for perpetual licenses. For term licenses, the Company determines SSP of standard product support at the lower end of the SSP range used for perpetual licenses because the term licenses are time bound, resulting in a lower value placed on product support as compared to a perpetual license.

(iv)

Premium product support, consulting services, and education services –SSP of premium product support, consulting services, and education services is established by using a bell-shaped curve approach to define a narrow range within each geographic region in which the services are discounted off of the list price on a standalone basis.

The Company often provides options to purchase future offerings at a discount. The Company analyzes the option price against the previously established SSP of the goods or services to determine if the options represent material rights that should be accounted for as separate performance obligations.  In general, an arrangement includes acceptance criteria, revenueoption sold at or above SSP is not recognized untilconsidered a material right because the Company can objectively demonstratecustomer could have received that right without entering into the software or service can meet the acceptance criteria, or the acceptance period lapses, whichever occurs earlier.contract.  If a software license arrangement obligatesmaterial right exists, revenue associated with the Company to deliver specified future products or upgrades, revenueoption is deferred and recognized when the specified future productgoods or upgradesservices are delivered,transferred, or when the obligationoption expires. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, separate performance obligations arising from future purchase options have not been material.

Incremental Costs to deliver specified future products expires, whichever occurs earlier. If a software license arrangement obligatesObtain Customer Contracts

Incremental costs incurred to obtain contracts with customers include certain variable compensation (e.g., commissions and bonuses) paid to the Company’s sales team.  Although the Company to deliver unspecified future products, then revenue is recognizedmay bundle its goods and services into one contract, commissions are individually determined on each distinct good or service in the contract.  The Company expenses as incurred those amounts earned on consulting and education services, which are generally performed within a one-year period and primarily sold on a subscription basis, ratablystandalone basis. The Company also expenses as incurred those amounts earned on product license sales, since the amount is earned when the license is delivered. The Company capitalizes those amounts earned on initial-year product support and cloud subscriptions and amortizes the costs over a period of time that is consistent with the termpattern of the contract.

License revenue derived from sales to resellers or original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) who purchase the Company’s products for resale is recognized upon sufficient evidence that the products have been soldtransfer to the end user, provided all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.  The Company’s standard software license and reseller agreements do not include any return rights other than the right to return non-conforming products for repair or replacement under standard product warranties.  During the last three fiscal years,customer, which the Company has determined to be a period of three years. Although the Company typically sells product support and cloud subscriptions for a period of one year, a majority of customers renew their product support and cloud subscription arrangements.  Three years is generally the period after which platforms are no longer supported by the Company's support team and when customers generally choose to upgrade their software platform.  The Company does not experienced anycurrently pay variable compensation on product returnssupport or cloud subscription renewals.  As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, capitalized costs to obtain customer contracts, net of accumulated amortization, were $6.1 million and $4.8 million, respectively, and are presented within “Deposits and other assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.  During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, amortization expenses related to warranty claims.

The Company generally offers either commercial discounts or referral fees to its channel partners, depending on the nature of services performed. Revenue recognized from transactions with channel partners involved in resale or distribution activities is recorded net of any commercial discounts provided to them. Referral fees paid to channel partners not involved in resale or distribution activitiesthese capitalized costs were $3.1 million, $2.9 million, and $2.3 million, respectively, and are expensed as cost of revenuesreflected within “Sales and during the last three fiscal years, were not significant.

The Company’s standard software license agreements do not include any price protection provisions.  However, transactions under the General Services Administration Federal Supply Schedule contract must comply with the Price Reductions clause.  In addition, certain government agencies have the right to cancel contracts for “convenience.”  During the last three fiscal years, there were no material amounts refunded under the Price Reductions clause and there were no material contracts cancelled for convenience.

Amounts collected prior to satisfying the above revenue recognition criteria are included in net deferred revenue and advance paymentsmarketing” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Software revenue recognition requires judgment, including determinations about whether collectability is reasonably assured, the fee is fixed and determinable, a software arrangement includes multiple elements, and if so, whether VSOE exists for those elements.  Judgment is also required to assess whether future releasesStatements of certain software represent new products or upgrades and enhancements to existing products.

The Company also generates subscription services revenues primarily from its cloud services offerings. Subscription services revenues include subscription fees from customers for access to the full breadth of MicroStrategy Analytics and MicroStrategy Mobile capabilities, database services, and data integration services. The Company’s standard arrangements with customers generally do not provide the customer with the right to take possession of the software supporting the cloud-based application service at any time. As such, these arrangements are considered service contracts and revenue is recognized ratably over the service period of the contract, following completion of the set-up service.  Any related set-up service fees are recognized ratably over the longer of the contract period or the estimated average life of the customer relationship. 

The Company’s subscription services are generally offered as standalone arrangements or as part of arrangements that include professional services.  If deliverables in a multiple-element arrangement have standalone value upon delivery, the Company accounts for each such deliverable separately. The Company has concluded that its subscription services and its professional services each have standalone value. When the Company enters into multiple-element arrangements that include subscription services and professional services, the total arrangement consideration is allocated to each of the deliverables based on the relative selling price hierarchy.  The Company determines the relative selling price for each deliverable using VSOE of selling price, if available, or its best estimate of selling price (“BESP”), if VSOE is not available.  The Company has determined that third-party evidence of selling price is not a practical alternative due to differences in its services offerings as compared to other companies and the lack of availability of third-party pricing information.  For professional services, the Company has established VSOE because a consistent number of standalone sales of this deliverable have been priced within aOperations.  

84


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

reasonably narrow range.  For subscription services, the Company has not established VSOE because, among other factors, the offering is relatively new and its pricing model continues to evolve. Accordingly, the Company uses BESP to determine the relative selling price of its subscription services.

The Company determines BESP by reviewing historical transactions and by considering the service’s pricing models and objectives that take into account factors such as gross margin, the size and volume of the transactions, perceived pricing sensitivity, and growth strategies.  The determination of BESP is made through consultation with, and approval by, the Company’s management team, taking into consideration the go-to-market strategy.  As the Company’s pricing and go-to-market strategies evolve, the Company may modify its pricing practices in the future, which could result in changes to the determination of VSOE and BESP.

Amounts, upon invoicing, are recorded in accounts receivable and either gross deferred revenue or revenue, depending on whether the applicable revenue recognition criteria have been met. 

(l)(o) Advertising Costs

Advertising costs include production costs, which are expensed the first time the advertisement takes place, and media placement costs, which are expensed in the month the advertising appears.  Total advertising costs were $5.7$0.1 million, $1.3$0.9 million, and $0.5$7.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015,2018, respectively.  As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the Company had no0 prepaid advertising costs.

(m)(p) Share-based Compensation

The Company maintains itsthe 2013 Stock IncentiveEquity Plan, (as amended, the “2013 Equity Plan”), under which the Company’s employees, officers, directors, and other eligible participants may be awarded various types of share-based compensation, including options to purchase shares of the Company’s class A common stock.stock, restricted stock units, and other stock-based awards.  The Company recognizes share-based compensation expense associated with such stock optionthese awards on a straight-line basis over the award’s requisite service period (generally, the vesting period).  TheFor options and other stock-based awards, the share-based compensation expense is based on the fair value of suchthe awards on the date of grant, as estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.  For restricted stock units, the share-based compensation expense is based on the fair value of the Company’s class A common stock on the date of grant.  See Note 11,12, Share-based Compensation, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the 2013 Equity Plan, related share-based compensation expense, and assumptions used in determining the Black-Scholes option pricing model.fair value of these awards.

(n)(q) Income Taxes

The Company is subject to federal, state, and local income taxes in the United States and manya number of foreign countries. Deferred income taxes are provided based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the taxes become payable.  For uncertain income tax positions, the Company uses a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold based on the technical merits of the income tax position taken.  Income tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured in order to determine the tax benefit recognized in the financial statements.  The Company recognizes accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits as part of income tax expense.  Penalties, if incurred, are recognized as a component of income tax expense.

The Company provides a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to their estimated realizable value, when appropriate.

(o)(r) Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is determined by dividing the net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares and participating securities outstanding during the period.  Participating securities are included in the basic earnings per share calculation when dilutive.  Diluted earnings per share is determined by dividing the net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares and potential common shares outstanding during the period.  Potential common shares are included in the diluted earnings per share calculation when dilutive.  Potential common shares consisting of class A common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding employee stock options and warrantsthe vesting of restricted stock units are computed using the

85


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

treasury stock method.  Potential common shares also consistconsisting of class A common stock issuable upon conversion of the Company’s convertible senior notes are computed using the treasury stock method. As discussed in Note 9, Convertible Senior Notes, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company currently intends to settle the principal amount of the notes in cash and any excess value in shares of class A common stock. Therefore, only the amount by which the conversion value exceeds the aggregate principal amount of preferred stock.  Beginning January 1, 2017, excess tax benefits are no longer includedthe notes (“the conversion spread”) is considered in computing potential common shares issuable under the calculationtreasury stock method. The conversion spread will have a dilutive impact only when the average market price of diluted earningsthe Company’s class A common stock for a given period exceeds the conversion price, which was $397.99 per share on a prospective basis.  as of December 31, 2020.

The Company has two classes of common stock: class A common stock and class B common stock.  Holders of class A common stock generally have the same rights, including rights to dividends, as holders of class B common stock, except that holders of class A common stock have one vote per share while holders of class B common stock have ten votes per share.  Each share of class B common stock is convertible at any time, at the option of the holder,

85


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

into one share of class A common stock.  As such, basic and fully diluted earnings per share for class A and class B common stock are the same.  The Company has never declared or paid any cash dividends on either class A or class B common stock.  As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, there were no0 shares of preferred stock outstanding.

(p)(s) Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency of the Company’s international operations is generally the local currency.  Accordingly, all assets and liabilities of international subsidiaries are translated using exchange rates in effect at the end of the period, and revenue and expenses are translated using weighted average monthly exchange rates for the period.period in which the transactions occur.  The related translation adjustments are reported in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” in stockholders’ equity.  In general, upon complete or substantially complete liquidation of an investment in an international subsidiary, the amount of accumulated translation adjustments attributable to that subsidiary is reclassified from stockholders’ equity to the statement of operations.  Transaction gains and losses arising from transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the entity involved are included in the results of operations.

In 2015, as a result of the completion of the liquidation of one of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries, a $0.3 million foreign currency translation gain was reclassified from “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets to “Other (expense) income, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.  No reclassifications were recorded in 2017 or 2016.  As of December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015,2018, the cumulative foreign currency translation balances were $(6.0)$(3.9) million, $(10.8)$(9.8) million, and $(7.4)$(9.8) million, respectively.  Since the Company intends to indefinitely reinvest its undistributed earnings of all of its subsidiaries, noNaN taxes were recognized on the temporary differences resulting from foreign currency translation adjustments for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015.2018.

Transaction gains and losses arising from transactions denominated in foreign currencies resulted in net losses of $7.6 million and $1.0 million in 2020 and 2019, respectively, and a net lossgain of $7.0$4.7 million in 2017 and net gains of $3.0 million and $2.4 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively,2018, and are included in “Other (expense) income, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(q)(t) Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, short-term investments, foreign currency forward contracts, and accounts receivable. The Company places its cash equivalents and enters into foreign currency forward contracts with high credit-quality financial institutions and invests its excess cash primarily in short-term investments. The Company has established guidelines relative to credit ratings and maturities that seek to maintain safety and liquidity.

The Company sells products and servicesits offerings to various companies across several industries throughout the world in the ordinary course of business.  The Company routinely assesses the financial strength of its customers and maintains allowances for anticipated losses.  As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016, no2019, 0 individual customer accounted for 10% or more of net accounts receivable, and for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015, no2018, 0 individual customer accounted for 10% or more of revenue.

 

 

86


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(3) Recent Accounting Standards

Share-based compensation accountingCredit losses

In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”), to simplify certain aspects of accounting for share-based payment transactions.  Under ASU 2016-09, all excess tax benefits should be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement, regardless of whether the benefit reduces taxes payable in the current period.  The excess tax benefits will be combined with other income tax cash flows within operating activities in the statement of cash flows.  In addition, excess tax benefits or tax deficiencies will no longer be included in the calculation of assumed proceeds under the treasury stock method of computing diluted earnings per share. ASU 2016-09 also allows companies to make an accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards expected to vest or to account for forfeitures as they occur, when accruing share-based compensation expense. Lastly, ASU 2016-09 permits employers to withhold up to the employee’s maximum statutory tax rate in applicable jurisdictions and still qualify for the exception to liability classification. Cash paid by an employer when directly withholding shares for tax-withholding purposes should be classified as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows.

The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2017 and has:

(i)

recognized excess tax benefits as part of the “Provision for income taxes” line item in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, on a prospective basis.  

(ii)

combined the impact of excess tax benefits with the “Deferred taxes” line item within operating activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, on a prospective basis.  

(iii)

excluded excess tax benefits or tax deficiencies in the calculation of the Company’s diluted earnings per share, on a prospective basis; and  

(iv)

made an accounting policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur, on a modified retrospective basis, the impact of which is generally consistent with the Company’s previous method of estimating forfeitures.  

No prior periods have been adjusted in connection with the Company’s adoption of ASU 2016-09.  In addition, no cumulative-effect adjustments to retained earnings have been recorded2016-13 effective as of January 1, 2017 because there were no unrecognized excess tax benefits or tax deficiencies outstanding2020.  Under ASU 2016-13, the Company applies a current expected credit loss (“CECL”) impairment model to its trade accounts receivable, in which lifetime expected credit losses on such financial assets are measured and no expected forfeitures appliedrecognized at each reporting date based on historical, current, and forecasted information. Under the CECL model, trade accounts receivable with similar risk characteristics are analyzed on a collective (pooled) basis. ASU 2016-13 also changed the impairment accounting for available-for-sale debt securities, requiring credit losses to be recorded through an allowance for credit losses rather than as a reduction in the amortized cost basis of the securities.  Impairment due to factors other than credit loss will continue to be recorded through other comprehensive income (loss).  Since adoption of this guidance, all of the Company’s share-based compensation expense asavailable-for-sale debt securities have consisted of U.S. Treasury securities with stated maturity dates between three months and one year from the endpurchase date and none of these investments have been impaired at periods’ end. As of December 31, 2020, the preceding year.Company did not hold any short-term investments. The remaining amendments under ASU 2016-09adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, andor cash flows. NaN cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings was made.

Statement of cash flows

In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) (“ASU 2016-18”), to address the diversity in practice that currently exists regarding the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash on the statement of cash flows. Under ASU 2016-18, entities will be required to include restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents with total cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning and end of period amounts on the statement of cash flows. Entities will also be required to disclose information about the nature of their restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. Additionally, if cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents are presented in more than one line item in the statement of financial position, entities will be required to present a reconciliation, either on the face of the statement of cash flows or disclosed in the notes, of the totals in the statement of cash flows to the related line item captions in the statement of financial position. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2017 and retrospectively applied the required updates to its Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for all periods presented. The Company does not consider its restricted cash balances to be material for further disclosure or reconciliation. The adoption of this guidance did not impact the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or footnote disclosures.

8786


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Cloud computing arrangements

The Company adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-15, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract (“ASU 2018-15”) effective as of January 1, 2020 and elected to apply the guidance prospectively. ASU 2018-15 requires customers in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract to follow existing internal-use software guidance to determine which implementation costs to capitalize and which costs to expense.  Customers are required to amortize the capitalized implementation costs over the term of the hosting arrangement, which might extend beyond the noncancelable period.  Financial statement presentation under ASU 2018-15 requires: (i) capitalized implementation costs be classified in the same balance sheet line item as the amounts prepaid for the related hosting arrangement; (ii) amortization of capitalized implementation costs be presented in the same income statement line item as the service fees for the related hosting arrangement; and (iii) cash flows related to capitalized implementation costs be presented within the same category of cash flow activity as the cash flows for the related hosting arrangement (i.e. operating activity).  Prior to the adoption of ASU 2018-15, the Company expensed as incurred all implementation costs related to cloud computing arrangements that were service contracts. As of December 31, 2020, the Company did not have any material capitalized implementation costs related to cloud computing arrangements that are service contracts.

Lease accounting

The Company adopted ASU 2016-02 effective as of January 1, 2019 and elected the transition option to apply the new lease requirements as of the adoption date without restating comparative periods presented in its Consolidated Financial Statements. Additionally, the Company elected the package of practical expedients described in ASU 2016-02, which includes not reassessing the following: (i) lease classification of existing leases, (ii) whether expired or existing contracts contain leases, and (iii) initial direct costs for existing leases.  

Upon adoption of ASU 2016-02, the Company recognized ROU assets of $88.8 million, total lease liabilities of $116.9 million, reductions in total deferred rent of $28.5 million, and reductions in prepaid expenses of $0.4 million in its 2019 beginning balances. All adjustments relate to the Company’s operating leases; the Company does not have any material leases that are classified as finance leases. There was 0 cumulative effect adjustment to the Company’s 2019 beginning retained earnings balance as the Company did not have material unamortized initial direct costs. Beginning in 2019, the Company presents the amortization of its operating ROU assets and the change in its operating lease liabilities within the operating activities section of its Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The adoption of ASU 2016-02 did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Revenue from contracts with customers

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance.  The standard’s core principle is that an entity should recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  The standard also requires disclosure of additional information to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers.

The Company will adopt this guidance and its subsequent amendmentsadopted ASU 2014-09 effective as of January 1, 2018, and will adjust prior period consolidated financial statements to reflectusing the full retrospective adoption, beginning with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the first quarter of 2018.  The Company has substantially completed the implementation of key system changes and changes to internal controls over financial reporting to allow the Company to timely compile the information needed to account for transactions under this new guidance and to adjust its prior periods’ consolidated financial statements.

method.  In adopting ASU 2014-09, the Company expectshas made the following significant changes in accounting principles:

 

(i)

Timing of revenue recognition for term license sales. Under ASU 2014-09, the Company will recognizerecognizes product licenselicenses revenue from term licenses upon delivery of the software.  Previously, this revenue was recognized over the term of the arrangement.

 

(ii)

Timing of revenue recognition for sales to channel partners.  Under ASU 2014-09, the Company will recognizerecognizes revenue from sales made to resellers and OEMs when control of the productslicense transfers to the reseller or OEM, less adjustments for returns or price protection.  Previously, this revenue was not recognized until the productlicense was sold by the reseller or OEM to the end user. Revenue from sales made to resellers continues to be recognized when control of the license is transferred to the end user.

 

(iii)

Allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract.  Under ASU 2014-09, the Company will allocateallocates the transaction price to the various performance obligations in the contract based on their relative standalone selling price (“SSP”).SSP.  Except for SSP of product support, the Company’s methodologies for estimating SSP of its various performance obligations will beare generally consistent with the Company’s previous methodologies used to establish VSOEvendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value on multiple

87


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

element arrangements.  TheWhereas VSOE of product support was previously based on the optional stated renewal fee within the contract, SSP of product support will resultunder ASU 2014-09 is established as a range within each geographic region as discussed in a difference inNote 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the allocation of the transaction price between product support and product license performance obligations.Consolidated Financial Statements.  The Company expects the impact from SSP-based allocations was not material to the Company’s prior or current period Consolidated Financial Statements and is not expected to be immaterial to the financial statements.material in future periods.

 

(iv)

Material rights. The Company’s contracts with customers may include options to acquire additional goods and services at a discount.  Under ASU 2014-09, certain of these options may be considered material rights if soldthe optional goods and services can be purchased at prices below SSP and would be treated as separate performance obligations and included in the allocation of the transaction price. Previously, none of the Company’s options were considered material rights. The Company expects the impact from material rights was not material to the Company’s prior or current period Consolidated Financial Statements and is not expected to be immaterial to the financial statements.material in future periods.

 

(v)

Presentation of accounts receivable, contract assets, and contract liabilities (deferred revenue). Under ASU 2014-09, the Company’s rights to consideration are presented separately depending on whether those rights are conditional (“contract assets”) or unconditional. The Company will present its unconditional rights to consideration as “accounts(“accounts receivable” in its Consolidated Balance Sheets. In contrast, separate “contract assets” will represent rights to consideration that are subject to a condition other than the passage of time, and will be comprised primarily of accrued sales- and usage-based royalty revenue.  Previously, this revenue was not recognized until quarterly royalty reporting had been received from the OEM.  Under ASU 2014-09, once quarterly royalty reporting has been received, the related contract assets will be transferred to accounts receivable.  Current and non-current contract assets will be included under “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” and “Deposits and other assets,” respectively, on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.  Further, contract assets will be netted against “contract liabilities” at the contract level.). See Note 6, Contract liabilities will be presented as “deferred revenue” on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and will be comprised of consideration received, or accounts receivable recorded, priorBalances, to the transfer of goods or services to the customer.Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on Balance Sheet presentation.  Under ASU 2014-09, the Company cannot net accounts receivable with contract liabilities (“deferred revenuerevenue”) and the

88


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Company will no longer offsetoffsets its accounts receivable and deferred revenue balances for unpaid items that are included in the deferred revenue balance.balance and for which there is an enforceable right for payment. Previously, this offsetting of accounts receivable and deferred revenue balances for unpaid amounts was applied in the Company’s financial statements.    prior period Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

(vi)

Deferral of incremental direct costs to obtaining a contract with a customer.  Under ASU 2014-09, the Company will capitalizecapitalizes certain variable compensation (i.e., sales commissions) payable to its sales force and subsequently amortizeamortizes the capitalized costs over a period of time that is consistent with the transfer of the related good or service to the customer, which the Company has determined to be three years. Capitalized costs, net of accumulated amortization, will be included in “Deposits and other assets” on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.  Previously, the Company elected to expense these incremental direct costs as incurred.

The Company currently estimates the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will increase its 2016 beginning retained earnings balance by approximately $13.0 million, offset by a $13.0 million decrease in gross deferred revenues, a $5.0 million decrease in deferred tax assets, net of deferred tax liabilities, a $4.0 million increase in other non-current assets, and a $1.0 million increase in other current assets.  In addition, net accounts receivable and net deferred revenues as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 will each further increase by approximately $95.9 million and $101.5 million, respectively, due to the Company no longer offsetting these balances for unpaid amounts included in the gross deferred revenue balances. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company estimates $2.5 million and $3.0 million, respectively, of previously expensed variable compensation will be capitalized and amortized over a three-year period.  The Company estimates that product licenses revenues will decrease by approximately $0.5 million and increase by approximately $1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  The Company also estimates its provision for income taxes will decrease by approximately $1.5 million and increase by approximately $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Intra-entity asset transfers

In October 2016, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory (“ASU 2016-16”), to improve the accounting for income tax effects of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. Under ASU 2016-16, the deferral of the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory is eliminated. Entities will be required to recognize the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory when the transfers occur. The standard requires a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption using a modified retrospective approach. The Company will adoptadopted this guidance effective as of January 1, 2018. The adoption of this guidance isdid not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. NaN cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings was made.

 

Lease accountingAccounting for Income Taxes

 

In February 2016,December 2019, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 842)740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASU 2016-02”2019-12”), which requires lease assets and lease liabilities be recognized.  ASU 2019-12 simplifies the accounting for all leases, in additionincome taxes by eliminating certain exceptions related to the disclosure of key information to enable users of financial statements to assessapproach for intraperiod tax allocation, the amount, timing,methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from an entity’s leasing arrangements.  ASU 2016-02 defines a lease as a contract, or part of a contract, that conveys both (i) the right to obtain economic benefits from and (ii) direct the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.  Under ASU 2016-02, leases are classified as either finance or operating leases. For finance leases, a lessee shall recognize in profit or loss the amortization of the lease asset and interest on the lease liability.  For operating leases, a lessee shall recognize in profit or loss a single lease cost, calculated so that the remaining cost of the lease is allocated over the remaining lease term, generally on a straight-line basis.  ASU 2016-02 requires the recognition and measurement of leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach and is effective for interim and annual periods beginningdeferred tax liabilities related to outside basis differences. The Company will adopt this guidance on January 1, 2019.  Early adoption is permitted.2021, with certain amendments applied prospectively and others requiring retrospective application.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact ofbelieves this guidance will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

 

88


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Accounting for Convertible Instruments

In August 2020, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2020-06, Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity (“ASU 2020-06”).  ASU 2020-06 simplifies the accounting for convertible instruments, the accounting for contracts in an entity’s own equity, and the related earnings per share calculations.  The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021; however, the Company currently plans to early adopt this guidance on January 1, 2021 using the modified retrospective method, which will result in a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings on the date of adoption.  Prior period financial statements will not be restated upon adoption.

Upon adoption of ASU 2020-06, the Company expects the following significant accounting changes:

(i)

Elimination of the cash conversion model.  Under current GAAP, instruments that may be partially settled in cash are in the scope of the “cash conversion” model, which requires the conversion feature to be separately reported in equity. Under ASU 2020-06, the Company will no longer be required to separately record the conversion feature in equity and instead will account for the convertible instrument as a single unit of debt, thereby eliminating the subsequent amortization of the debt discount as interest expense. Similarly, the portion of issuance costs previously allocated to equity under current GAAP will be reclassified to debt and amortized as interest expense. As a result of these changes, the net deferred tax liability associated with the previous equity components will also be reversed upon adoption.

(ii)

Use of the “if-converted” method for calculating diluted earnings per share.  Under current GAAP, the Company utilizes the “treasury stock” method for computing the diluted earnings per share impact of its convertible senior notes, as its current intention is to settle the principal amount of the notes with cash.  Under the treasury stock method, only the excess of the average stock price of the Company’s class A common stock for the reporting period over the conversion price is utilized in determining the impact to the diluted earnings per share denominator.  Under ASU 2020-06, the Company may no longer rebut the presumption of share settlement for its convertible instrument and therefore may no longer utilize the treasury stock method. Instead, the Company will be required to use the if-converted method, which requires all underlying shares be included in the denominator regardless of the average stock price for the reporting period, in addition to adding back to the numerator the related interest expense from the stated coupon and the amortization of issuance costs, if dilutive.

The Company currently estimates the adoption of ASU 2020-06 will impact the opening consolidated balance sheet as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Balance Sheet

December 31, 2020

As Reported

 

 

Effect of the

Adoption of ASU

2020-06

 

 

January 1, 2021

As Adjusted

 

Deferred tax liabilities (assets)

 

8,211

 

 

 

(41,693

)

 

 

(33,482

)

Convertible senior notes, net

 

486,366

 

 

 

148,546

 

 

 

634,912

 

Additional paid-in-capital

 

763,051

 

 

 

(107,810

)

 

 

655,241

 

Retained earnings

 

575,965

 

 

 

957

 

 

 

576,922

 

(4) Short-term Investments

89


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

(4) Fair Value Measurements

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no financial assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.  All of the Company’s foreign currency forward contracts (designated as Level 2, non-hedging derivative instruments) were settled by December 31, 2015.  Changes in the fair value of the Company’s foreign currency forward contracts during the year ended December 31, 2015 resulted in a net gain of $0.5 million recorded to “Other income, net.”  

There were no transfers among the levels within the fair value hierarchy during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.  As of December 31, 2017 and 2016,2020, the Company had no assets or liabilities that were required to be measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

(5) Short-term Investments

The Company periodically invests a portion of its excess cash indid 0t hold any short-term investment instruments. Substantially all of the Company’s short-term investments are in U.S. Treasury securities and certificates of deposit, and the Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments to maturity.  The stated maturity dates of these investments are between three months and one year from the purchase date.  These held-to-maturity investments are recorded at amortized cost and included within “Short-term investments” on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.  The fair value of held-to-maturity investments in U.S. Treasury securities and certificates of deposit is determined based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical securities (Level 1 inputs).

The amortized cost carrying value, and fair value of held-to-maturityavailable-for-sale investments at December 31, 20172019 were $254.9 million, $254.9$108.8 million and $254.8 million, respectively. The amortized cost, carrying value, and fair value of held-to-maturity investments at December 31, 2016 were $187.3 million, $187.3 million, and $187.3$108.9 million, respectively.  The gross unrecognized holding gains and lossesaccumulated in other comprehensive loss were not material for 2017, 2016, and 2015. No other-than-temporary impairments related to these investments have been recognized as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.2019. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016,2019, NaN of the Company’s available-for-sale investments were not material.in unrealized loss positions.

(5) Digital Assets

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company purchased approximately 70,469 bitcoins for $1.125 billion in cash, including cash from the net proceeds related to the liquidation of short-term investments and the issuance of its convertible senior notes. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company incurred $70.7 million of impairment losses on its bitcoin. As of December 31, 2020, the carrying value of the Company’s bitcoin was $1.054 billion, which reflects cumulative impairments of $70.7 million.  The carrying value represents the lowest fair value of the bitcoins at any time since their acquisition.  The Company did 0t sell any of its bitcoins during the year ended December 31, 2020.

 

 

(6) Accounts ReceivableContract Balances

The Company invoices its customers in accordance with billing schedules established in each contract.  The Company’s rights to consideration from customers are presented separately in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets depending on whether those rights are conditional or unconditional.  

The Company presents unconditional rights to consideration from customers within “Accounts receivable, net” in its Consolidated Balance Sheets.  All of the Company’s contracts are generally non-cancellable and/or non-refundable, and therefore an unconditional right generally exists when the customer is billed or amounts are billable per the contract.

Accounts receivable (in thousands) consisted of the following, as of:

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Billed and billable

 

$

169,554

 

 

$

188,038

 

Less: unpaid deferred revenue

 

 

(95,864

)

 

 

(101,538

)

Accounts receivable, gross

 

 

73,690

 

 

 

86,500

 

Less: allowance for doubtful accounts

 

 

(4,190

)

 

 

(3,181

)

Accounts receivable, net

 

$

69,500

 

 

$

83,319

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Billed and billable

 

$

200,221

 

 

$

165,153

 

Less: allowance for credit losses

 

 

(2,760

)

 

 

(1,637

)

Accounts receivable, net

 

$

197,461

 

 

$

163,516

 

 

TheChanges in the allowance for credit losses were not material for the year ended December 31, 2020.  In estimating its allowance for credit losses as of December 31, 2020, the Company offsets itsconsidered the impact from the pandemic caused by a novel strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) and established additional risk pools and reserves relating to customers in certain geographic areas and industries, in addition to separately assessing the reserves for certain customers that have been granted extended payment terms.

Rights to consideration that are subject to a condition other than the passage of time are considered contract assets and presented within “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets since the rights to consideration are expected to become unconditional and transfer to accounts receivable within one year.  Contract assets generally consist of accrued sales and usage-based royalty revenue.  In these arrangements, consideration is not billed or billable until the royalty reporting is received, generally in the subsequent quarter, at which time the contract asset transfers to accounts receivable and deferred revenue fora true-up adjustment is recorded to revenue.  These true-up adjustments are generally not material.  During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, there were 0 significant impairments to the Company’s contract assets, nor were there any unpaid itemssignificant changes in the timing of the Company’s contract assets being reclassified to accounts receivable. Contract assets included in deferred revenue“Prepaid expenses and advance payments.

The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts which represents its best estimate of probable losses inherentother current assets” in the accounts receivable balances.  The Company evaluates specific accounts when it becomes aware that a customer may not be able to meet its financial obligations due to deteriorationConsolidated Balance Sheets consisted of its liquidity or financial viability, credit ratings, or bankruptcy.  In addition, the Company periodically adjusts this allowance based on its review$1.1 million and assessment$1.2 million in accrued sales and usage-based royalty revenue as of the aging of receivables.

December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

90


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Contract liabilities are amounts received or due from customers in advance of the Company transferring the software or services to the customer.  In the case of multi-year service contracts arrangements, the Company generally does not invoice more than one year in advance of services and does not record deferred revenue for amounts that have not been invoiced and that require an additional contract.  Revenue is subsequently recognized in the period(s) in which control of the software or services is transferred to the customer.  The Company’s contract liabilities are presented as either current or non-current “Deferred revenue and advance payments” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, depending on whether the software or services are expected to be transferred to the customer within the next year.  

The Company’s “Accounts receivable, net” and “Deferred revenue and advance payments” balances in the Consolidated Balance Sheets include unpaid amounts related to contracts under which the Company has an enforceable right to invoice the customer for non-cancellable and/or non-refundable software and services. Changes in accounts receivable and changes in deferred revenue and advance payments are presented net of these unpaid amounts in “Operating activities” in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Deferred revenue and advance payments (in thousands) from customers consisted of the following, as of:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred product licenses revenue

 

$

1,495

 

 

$

481

 

Deferred subscription services revenue

 

 

26,258

 

 

 

16,561

 

Deferred product support revenue

 

 

156,216

 

 

 

161,670

 

Deferred other services revenue

 

 

7,281

 

 

 

8,395

 

Total current deferred revenue and advance payments

 

$

191,250

 

 

$

187,107

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred product licenses revenue

 

$

139

 

 

$

293

 

Deferred subscription services revenue

 

 

8,758

 

 

 

97

 

Deferred product support revenue

 

 

5,055

 

 

 

3,417

 

Deferred other services revenue

 

 

710

 

 

 

537

 

Total non-current deferred revenue and advance payments

 

$

14,662

 

 

$

4,344

 

During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, the Company recognized revenues of $182.6 million, $174.7 million, and $194.6 million, respectively, from amounts included in the total deferred revenue and advance payments balances at the beginning of the respective year.  For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, there were no significant changes in the timing of revenue recognition on the Company’s deferred balances.

As of December 31, 2020, the Company had an aggregate transaction price of $205.9 million allocated to remaining performance obligations related to product support, subscription services, other services, and, in limited cases, product licenses contracts.  The Company expects to recognize $191.3 million within the next 12 months and $14.7 million thereafter.

91


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(7) Property and Equipment

Property and equipment (in thousands) consisted of the following, as of:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Transportation equipment

 

$

48,645

 

 

$

48,835

 

 

$

48,645

 

 

$

48,645

 

Computer equipment and purchased software

 

 

57,515

 

 

 

60,692

 

 

 

61,299

 

 

 

58,920

 

Furniture and equipment

 

 

10,425

 

 

 

10,871

 

 

 

10,460

 

 

 

10,464

 

Leasehold improvements

 

 

28,511

 

 

 

27,737

 

 

 

31,403

 

 

 

31,023

 

Internally developed software

 

 

9,643

 

 

 

9,655

 

 

 

9,917

 

 

 

9,849

 

Property and equipment, gross

 

 

154,739

 

 

 

157,790

 

 

 

161,724

 

 

 

158,901

 

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

(101,380

)

 

 

(100,354

)

 

 

(118,749

)

 

 

(108,747

)

Property and equipment, net

 

$

53,359

 

 

$

57,436

 

 

$

42,975

 

 

$

50,154

 

 

Included in transportation equipment is the Company’s owned corporate aircraft, including capitalizable costs related to the repairs to the aircraft, and aircraft-related equipment.  As of December 31, 2017,2020, the net assetcarrying value of the aircraft and aircraft-related equipment was $36.9$30.0 million, net of $11.7$18.6 million of accumulated depreciation.  As of December 31, 2016,2019, the net assetcarrying value of the aircraft and aircraft-related equipment was $38.4$32.6 million, net of $10.2$16.0 million of accumulated depreciation.

Included in computer equipment at December 31, 2017 and 2016 is $0.6 million and $2.2 million, respectively, acquired under capital lease arrangements.  At December 31, 2017 and 2016, accumulated amortization relating to computer equipment under capital lease arrangements totaled $0.6 million and $2.2 million, respectively.

Depreciation and amortization expenseexpenses related to property and equipment including assets under capital leases, was $8.4were $11.4 million, $10.6$11.7 million, and $14.0$8.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015,2018, respectively.

 

(8) Leases

(8) Deferred Revenue

The Company leases office space in the United States and Advance Paymentsforeign locations under operating lease agreements. Office space is the Company’s only material underlying asset class under operating lease agreements. The Company has no material finance leases.

Deferred revenue

Under the Company’s office space lease agreements, fixed payments and advancevariable payments (in thousands) from customers consistedthat depend on an index or rate are typically comprised of base rent and parking fees. Additionally, under these agreements the Company is generally responsible for certain variable payments that typically include certain taxes, utilities and maintenance costs, and other fees. These variable lease payments are generally based on the Company’s occupation or usage percentages and are subject to adjustments by the lessor.

As of December 31, 2020, the Company’s ROU asset and total lease liability balances were $62.2 million and $82.9 million, respectively, for leases in the United States and $11.4 million and $12.2 million, respectively, for foreign leases. As of December 31, 2019, the Company’s ROU assets and total lease liabilities were $71.0 million and $97.5 million, respectively, for leases in the United States and $14.5 million and $15.5 million, respectively, for foreign leases. The Company’s most significant lease is for its corporate headquarters in Northern Virginia. The ROU asset and total lease liability balances related to the Company’s corporate headquarters lease were $59.0 million and $79.7 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2020, and $66.9 million and $93.3 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2019. The lease agreement for the Company’s corporate headquarters location is set to expire in December 2030, with an option for the Company to extend the term for an additional five or 10 consecutive years. The Company is currently not reasonably certain it will exercise this renewal option and therefore has not included the renewal option in the lease term. The lease agreement also includes an option to early terminate a portion of the following,leased space in exchange for a termination fee, which the Company exercised in the fourth quarter of 2020. This modification was not accounted for as of:a separate contract. Upon exercise of this early termination option, the Company reduced the lease liability balance by the amount of the termination fee, which was $1.6 million, and remeasured the remaining ROU Asset and lease liability, reducing them by $4.2 million and $7.0 million, respectively, which resulted in a gain on partial lease termination of $2.8 million. The $2.8 million gain on partial lease termination was recorded as a reduction to operating lease cost and is reflected within the “Operating lease cost” line in the table below. The $1.6 million termination fee is reflected within the “Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities” line in the table below. In remeasuring the ROU Asset, the Company elected to do so based on the on the remaining right of use. Several of the Company’s remaining leases also contain options for renewal or options to terminate all or a portion of the leased space. The Company continually assesses the likelihood of exercising these options and recognizes an option as part of its ROU assets and lease liabilities if and when it is reasonably certain that it will exercise the option.

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred product licenses revenue

 

$

11,113

 

 

$

13,023

 

Deferred subscription services revenue

 

 

17,324

 

 

 

18,303

 

Deferred product support revenue

 

 

168,043

 

 

 

162,781

 

Deferred other services revenue

 

 

9,465

 

 

 

10,015

 

Gross current deferred revenue and advance payments

 

 

205,945

 

 

 

204,122

 

Less: unpaid deferred revenue

 

 

(93,296

)

 

 

(98,587

)

Net current deferred revenue and advance payments

 

$

112,649

 

 

$

105,535

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred product licenses revenue

 

$

7,169

 

 

$

9,118

 

Deferred subscription services revenue

 

 

126

 

 

 

1,307

 

Deferred product support revenue

 

 

4,826

 

 

 

5,751

 

Deferred other services revenue

 

 

628

 

 

 

690

 

Gross non-current deferred revenue and advance payments

 

 

12,749

 

 

 

16,866

 

Less: unpaid deferred revenue

 

 

(2,568

)

 

 

(2,951

)

Net non-current deferred revenue and advance payments

 

$

10,181

 

 

$

13,915

 

9192


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The following table presents the Company’s total lease cost and other lease details for the year ended December 31, 2020 (in thousands, except years and discount rates):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Lease cost:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating lease cost

 

$

11,772

 

 

$

15,020

 

Short-term lease cost

 

 

1,158

 

 

 

2,015

 

Variable lease cost

 

 

1,382

 

 

 

1,175

 

Total lease cost

 

$

14,312

 

 

$

18,210

 

Other information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities

 

$

17,497

 

 

$

15,614

 

ROU assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities

 

$

743

 

 

$

5,016

 

Weighted average remaining lease term in years – operating leases

 

 

9.1

 

 

 

10.0

 

Weighted average discount rate – operating leases

 

 

6.1

%

 

 

6.0

%

The following table presents the maturities of the Company’s operating lease liabilities as of December 31, 2020 (in thousands):

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

2021

 

$

16,186

 

2022

 

 

14,311

 

2023

 

 

13,937

 

2024

 

 

12,051

 

2025

 

 

11,649

 

Thereafter

 

 

55,643

 

Total lease payments

 

 

123,777

 

Less: imputed interest

 

 

(28,636

)

Total

 

$

95,141

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reported as:

 

 

 

 

Current operating lease liabilities

 

$

10,813

 

Non-current operating lease liabilities

 

 

84,328

 

Total

 

$

95,141

 

(9) Convertible Senior Notes

In December 2020, the Company issued $650.0 million aggregate principal amount of 0.750% Convertible Senior Notes due 2025 (the “Notes”) in a private offering.  The $650.0 million aggregate principal amount included the full exercise of the option provided to the initial purchaser to purchase an additional $100.0 million principal amount of the Notes. The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company and bear interest at a fixed rate of 0.750% per annum, payable semiannually in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning on June 15, 2021.

93


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Holders of the Notes may receive additional interest under specified circumstances as outlined in the indenture relating to the issuance of the Notes (the “Indenture”). The Notes will mature on December 15, 2025, unless earlier converted, redeemed or repurchased in accordance with their terms. The total net proceeds from the offering, after deducting initial purchaser discounts and issuance costs, were approximately $634.7 million.

The Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to any of the Company’s indebtedness that is expressly subordinated in right of payment to the Notes; equal in right of payment to any of the Company’s unsecured indebtedness that is not so subordinated; effectively junior in right of payment to any of the Company’s secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness; and structurally junior to all indebtedness and other liabilities (including trade payables) of the Company’s subsidiaries.

The Notes are convertible into shares of the Company’s class A common stock at an initial conversion rate of 2.5126 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $397.99 per share of class A common stock). The conversion rate is subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments. In addition, following certain events that occur prior to the maturity date or if the Company delivers a notice of redemption, the Company will increase the conversion rate for a holder who elects to convert its notes in connection with such corporate event or notice of redemption, as the case may be, in certain circumstances as provided in the Indenture.

Prior to June 15, 2025, the Notes are convertible only under the following circumstances: (1) during any calendar quarter commencing after the calendar quarter ending on March 31, 2021 (and only during such calendar quarter), if the last reported sale price of the Company’s class A common stock for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) during the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on, and including, the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price on each applicable trading day; (2) during the 5 business day period after any 5 consecutive trading day period (the “measurement period”) in which the “trading price”  (as defined in the Indendutre) per $1,000 principal amount of notes for each trading day of the measurement period was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of the Company’s class A common stock and the conversion rate on each such trading day; (3) if the Company calls any or all of the Notes for redemption, at any time prior to the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceeding the redemption date; and (4) upon occurrence of specified corporate events as described in the Indenture.

On or after June 15, 2025 until the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date of the Notes, holders may convert the Notes at any time. Upon conversion of the Notes, the Company will pay or deliver, as the case may be, cash, shares of the Company’s class A common stock or a combination of cash and shares of class A common stock, at the Company’s election. It is the Company’s current intent to settle the principal amount of the Notes with cash.

Prior to December 20, 2023, the Company may not redeem the Notes.  The Company offsetsmay redeem for cash all or a portion of the Notes, at its accounts receivableoption, on or after December 20, 2023 if the last reported sale price of the Company’s class A common stock has been at least 130% of the conversion price then in effect for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive), including the trading day immediately preceding the date on which the Company provides a notice of redemption, during any 30 consecutive trading day period ending on, and deferred revenueincluding, the trading day immediately preceding the date on which the Company provides notice of redemption. The redemption price will be equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date.

If the Company undergoes a “fundamental change,” as defined in the Indenture, prior to maturity, subject to certain conditions, holders may require the Company to repurchase for cash all or any portion of their Notes at a fundamental change repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be repurchased, plus any accrued and unpaid items includedinterest to, but excluding, the fundamental change repurchase date.

The Indenture contains customary terms and covenants, including that upon certain events of default occurring and continuing, either the Trustee or the holders of at least 25% in deferred revenueprincipal amount of the outstanding Notes may declare 100% of the principal of, and advance payments.accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on, all the Notes to be due and payable.

94


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

(9)During the three months ended December 31, 2020, none of the Notes’ conversion features were triggered and no conversions occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2020. The Notes may be convertible thereafter if one or more of the conversion conditions is satisfied during future measurement periods.

In accounting for the issuance of the Notes, the Company separated the Notes into liability and equity components. The initial carrying amount of the liability component was determined by measuring the fair value of a similar debt instrument without any associated conversion features. The carrying amount of the equity component (representing the conversion option) was $153.5 million and was determined by deducting the fair value of the liability component from the par value of the Notes. The equity component was recorded in “additional paid-in-capital” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet and will not be remeasured as long as it continues to meet the conditions for equity classification.

The Company incurred approximately $15.3 million in customary offering expenses associated with the Notes (“issuance costs”).  In accounting for the issuance costs, the Company allocated the total costs incurred to the liability and equity components of the Notes based on their relative values.  Issuance costs attributable to the liability component of $11.6 million were taken as a reduction to the principal amount of the Notes. Issuance costs attributable to the equity component of $3.6 million have been netted against the equity component of the Notes in “additional paid-in-capital” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The excess of the principal amount of the liability component over its carrying amount (the “debt discount”) and the issuance costs attributable to the liability component are amortized to interest expense over the contractual term of the Notes at an effective interest rate of 6.82%. As of December 31, 2020, the net carrying amount of the liablity component of the Notes is classified as a long-term liability in the “Convertible Senior Notes” line item in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as follows (in thousands):

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

Principal

 

$

650,000

 

Unamortized debt discount

 

 

(152,075

)

Unamortized issuance costs

 

 

(11,559

)

Net carrying amount of debt

 

$

486,366

 

As of December 31, 2020, the net carrying amount of the equity component of the Notes is classified as permanent equity and included in “additional paid in capital” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as follows (in thousands):

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

Debt discount for conversion option

 

$

153,527

 

Issuance costs allocated to equity

 

 

(3,602

)

Deferred tax liability, net of deferred tax asset, related to debt discount and issuance costs

 

 

(42,115

)

Net carrying amount of equity

 

$

107,810

 

For the year ended December 31, 2020, interest expense related to the Notes was as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

Contractual interest expense

 

$

271

 

Amortization of debt discount

 

 

1,452

 

Amortization of issuance costs allocated to debt

 

 

91

 

Total interest expense

 

$

1,814

 

95


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(10) Commitments and Contingencies

(a) Commitments

From time to time, the Company enters into certain types of contracts that require it to indemnify parties against third-party claims.  These contracts primarily relate to agreements under which the Company assumes indemnity obligations for intellectual property infringement, as well as other obligations from time to time depending on arrangements negotiated with customers and other third parties.  The conditions of these obligations vary.  Thus, the overall maximum amount of the Company’s indemnification obligations cannot be reasonably estimated.  Historically, the Company has not been obligated to make significant payments for these obligations and does not currently expect to incur any material obligations in the future.  Accordingly, the Company has not recorded an indemnification liability on its balance sheetsBalance Sheets as of December 31, 20172020 or December 31, 2016.

The Company leases office space and computer and other equipment under operating lease agreements.  Under the lease agreements, in addition to base rent, the Company is generally responsible for certain taxes, utilities and maintenance costs, and other fees.  Several of these leases include options for renewal or purchase.  The Company does not have any material capital leases.  As of December 31, 2017, the Company leased approximately 214,000 square feet of office space at a location in Northern Virginia that began serving as its corporate headquarters in October 2010 and was to expire in December 2020.  In January 2018, the Company amended the lease to extend the lease term through December 2030. See Note 17, Subsequent Events, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, deferred rent of $8.5 million and $12.3 million, respectively, was included in other long-term liabilities and $3.8 million and $3.5 million, respectively, was included in current accrued expenses.2019.

As a result of the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, (the “Tax Act”), the Company estimated and recorded a one-time $40.3 millionfinal tax expense of $37.2 million related to the mandatory deemed repatriation transition tax (“Transition Tax”) during the year endedTax, comprised of a provisional Transition Tax obligation of $40.3 million in 2017 and a subsequent $(3.1) million measurement-period adjustment in 2018.  As of December 31, 2017.  See Note 10, Income Taxes, to the Consolidated Financial Statement for further information.  At December 31, 2017, $36.82020, $28.0 million of the Transition Tax was unpaid, of which $25.1 million is included in “other“Other long-term liabilities” and $3.5$3.0 million was netted against “prepaidis included in “Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other current assets”operating lease liabilities” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The following table shows future minimum rent payments under noncancellable operating leasesrelated to the Notes (semi-annual interest payments and principal upon maturity), noncancelable purchase agreements with initial terms of greater than one year, net of total future minimum rent payments to be received under noncancellable sublease agreements, and anticipated payments related to the one-time Transition Tax resulting from the Tax Act based on the expected due dates of the various installments as of December 31, 20172020 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Leases

 

 

Transition Tax

 

Year

 

Amount

 

 

Amount

 

 

Convertible Senior Notes

 

 

Purchase

Obligations

 

 

Transition

Tax

 

2018

 

$

24,508

 

 

$

3,450

 

2019

 

 

20,059

 

 

 

3,200

 

2020

 

 

18,779

 

 

 

3,200

 

2021

 

 

2,610

 

 

 

3,200

 

 

$

4,740

 

 

$

13,825

 

 

$

2,951

 

2022

 

 

1,758

 

 

 

3,200

 

 

 

4,875

 

 

 

9,673

 

 

 

2,952

 

2023

 

 

4,875

 

 

 

8,705

 

 

 

5,534

 

2024

 

 

4,875

 

 

 

669

 

 

 

7,379

 

2025

 

 

655,078

 

 

 

682

 

 

 

9,223

 

Thereafter

 

 

4,276

 

 

 

24,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,048

 

 

 

0

 

 

$

71,990

 

 

$

40,250

 

 

$

674,443

 

 

$

34,602

 

 

$

28,039

 

 

The above table does not include estimated payments related to the renewal of our corporate headquarters office lease in January 2018. See Note 17, Subsequent Events,9, Convertible Senior Notes, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information about our corporate headquarters office lease.regarding the Company’s commitments related to the Notes. Although the Notes will mature on December 15, 2025, they may be earlier converted, redeemed or repurchased in accordance with their terms.

92

See Note 8, Leases, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding the Company’s commitments that are related to lease agreements.  

(b) Contingencies

Following an internal review initiated in 2018, the Company believes that its Brazilian subsidiary failed or likely failed to comply with local procurement regulations in conducting business with certain Brazilian government entities.  

On February 6, 2020, the Company learned that a Brazilian court has authorized the Brazilian Federal Police to use certain investigative measures in its investigation into alleged corruption and procurement fraud involving certain government officials, pertaining to a particular transaction.  Pursuant to this court authorization, numerous entities and individuals across Brazil have been subject to the freezing of assets and other measures, including a former reseller and a former employee of the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary.  On February 6, 2020, the bank accounts of the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary were also frozen up to an amount of BRL 10.0 million, or approximately $2.3 million.  On May 22, 2020, these bank accounts of the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary were unfrozen on the basis of a court decision that found the alleged illicit origin of the amounts was not sufficiently evidenced.  On May 25, 2020, the Federal Prosecution Office presented an appeal to this decision, but the accounts will remain unfrozen pending the outcome of the appeal.  The transaction at issue is part of the basis of the previously reported failure or likely failure of the Brazilian subsidiary to comply with local procurement regulations.  The Company is not a subject of the investigation, and the Company is not aware of any allegations that the former employee or the Company made any payments to Brazilian government officials.  The Brazilian Federal Police has expanded the investigation to include other possible cases of procurement fraud involving Brazilian government entities and criminal penalties may be imposed against individuals; however, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary is not a target.  

96


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Total rental expenses under operating lease agreements for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 were $19.8 million, $20.3 million, and $22.6 million, respectively.

(b) Contingencies

In December 2011, DataTern, Inc. (“DataTern”) filed a complaint for patent infringement against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (the “District Court”). The complaint alleged that the Company infringes U.S. Patent No. 6,101,502 (the “’502 Patent”), allegedly owned by DataTern, by making, selling, or offering for sale several of the Company’s products and services, including MicroStrategy 9, MicroStrategy Intelligence Server, MicroStrategy Business Intelligence Platform, MicroStrategy Cloud Personal, and other MicroStrategy applications for creating or using data mining, dashboards, business analytics, data storage and warehousing, and web hosting support.  The complaint accused the Company of willful infringement and sought an unspecified amount of damages, an award of attorneys’ fees, and preliminary and permanent injunctive relief.  In light of a judgment in a separate action involving DataTern in another jurisdiction, in February 2013, MicroStrategy and DataTern filed motions for summary judgment of non-infringement and the District Court entered summary judgment against DataTern.  In March 2013, DataTern filed a notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the “Federal Circuit”).  In December 2014, the Federal Circuit issued an opinion vacating the District Court’s summary judgment, stating that the claim construction on which the summary judgment was based was incorrect.  In January 2015, the case was remanded to the District Court for further proceedings.  A claim construction ruling was issued in February 2017.  In August 2017, counsel for DataTern filed a motion to withdraw from the lawsuit.  The District Court initially gave DataTern a deadline of September 18, 2017 to find replacement counsel, which was later extended to October 20, 2017.  On October 20, 2017, the District Court dismissed the case for failure to prosecute when DataTern failed to identify substitute counsel.  The Company has received indemnification requests from certain of its channel partners and customers who were sued by DataTern inalso learned that Brazil’s Federal Comptroller General filed an administrative action against the District Court in lawsuits alleging infringement ofCompany’s Brazilian subsidiary with respect to the ‘502 Patent.alleged procurement violations. The proceedings against these channel partners and customers were stayed pendingCompany is taking measures to attempt to resolve this matter.

While the Company believes that it is probable that the resolution of DataTern’s lawsuit againstthese Brazilian matters will result in a loss, the Company.  On October 30, 2017,amount or range of loss is not reasonably estimable at this time.  Given the District Court dismissed with prejudice these channel partner and customer proceedings.  No estimated liability forstage of these matters, has been accruedthe outcome may result in a material impact on the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.Company’s earnings and financial results for the period in which any such liability is accrued.  However, the Company believes that the outcome of these matters will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position.

The Company is also involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Although the outcomes of these other legal proceedings are inherently difficult to predict, management does not expect the resolution of these other legal proceedings to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

The Company has contingent liabilities that, in management’s judgment, are not probable of assertion.  If such unasserted contingent liabilities were to be asserted, or become probable of assertion, the Company may be required to record significant expenses and liabilities in the period in which these liabilities are asserted or become probable of assertion.

 

(10)(11) Income Taxes

U.S. and international components of (loss) income before income taxes (in thousands) were comprised of the following for the periods indicated:

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

U.S.

 

$

19,166

 

 

$

51,145

 

 

$

68,555

 

 

$

(53,250

)

 

$

9,944

 

 

$

(18,295

)

Foreign

 

 

53,441

 

 

 

61,901

 

 

 

69,309

 

 

 

33,297

 

 

 

28,319

 

 

 

38,777

 

Total

 

$

72,607

 

 

$

113,046

 

 

$

137,864

 

 

$

(19,953

)

 

$

38,263

 

 

$

20,482

 

 

9397


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The (benefit from) provision for income taxes (in thousands) consisted of the following for the periods indicated:

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

48,794

 

 

$

18,453

 

 

$

11,748

 

 

$

1,861

 

 

$

1,256

 

 

$

(1,916

)

State

 

 

4,077

 

 

 

3,681

 

 

 

2,997

 

 

 

1,445

 

 

 

143

 

 

 

1,656

 

Foreign

 

 

4,074

 

 

 

4,941

 

 

 

7,565

 

 

 

5,221

 

 

 

5,135

 

 

 

6,460

 

 

$

56,945

 

 

$

27,075

 

 

$

22,310

 

 

$

8,527

 

 

$

6,534

 

 

$

6,200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

88

 

 

$

(4,742

)

 

$

9,215

 

 

$

(15,038

)

 

$

(749

)

 

$

(6,071

)

State

 

 

(1,342

)

 

 

(890

)

 

 

693

 

 

 

(6,269

)

 

 

(480

)

 

 

(2,047

)

Foreign

 

 

(727

)

 

 

695

 

 

 

(285

)

 

 

351

 

 

 

(1,397

)

 

 

(101

)

 

$

(1,981

)

 

$

(4,937

)

 

$

9,623

 

 

$

(20,956

)

 

$

(2,626

)

 

$

(8,219

)

Total provision

 

$

54,964

 

 

$

22,138

 

 

$

31,933

 

Total (benefit) provision

 

$

(12,429

)

 

$

3,908

 

 

$

(2,019

)

 

The benefit from or provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the federal statutory income tax rate to the Company’s loss or income before income taxes as follows for the periods indicated:

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Income tax expense at federal statutory rate

 

 

35.0

%

 

 

35.0

%

 

 

35.0

%

 

 

21.0

%

 

 

21.0

%

 

 

21.0

%

State taxes, net of federal tax effect

 

 

2.5

%

 

 

1.6

%

 

 

1.7

%

 

 

18.0

%

 

 

(1.7

)%

 

 

(1.3

)%

Foreign earnings taxed at different rates

 

 

(24.2

)%

 

 

(15.5

)%

 

 

(14.0

)%

 

 

21.7

%

 

 

(6.1

)%

 

 

(20.5

)%

Book tax difference in amortization of intangible property

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

(4.6

)%

 

 

0.0

%

Withholding tax

 

 

1.9

%

 

 

1.4

%

 

 

1.1

%

 

 

(12.5

)%

 

 

3.1

%

 

 

5.5

%

Foreign tax credit

 

 

(1.1

)%

 

 

(1.0

)%

 

 

(0.3

)%

 

 

3.8

%

 

 

(3.0

)%

 

 

(5.2

)%

Other international components

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

(0.1

)%

 

 

0.8

%

 

 

(3.5

)%

 

 

0.2

%

 

 

0.3

%

Change in valuation allowance

 

 

0.2

%

 

 

(0.8

)%

 

 

(0.1

)%

 

 

2.7

%

 

 

1.6

%

 

 

2.5

%

Deferred tax adjustments and rate changes

 

 

5.2

%

 

 

0.1

%

 

 

(0.1

)%

 

 

(3.4

)%

 

 

1.0

%

 

 

(1.7

)%

Deemed repatriation transition tax

 

 

55.5

%

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

0.0

%

Meals and entertainment

 

 

(1.3

)%

 

 

1.3

%

 

 

2.6

%

Non-deductible officers compensation

 

 

(12.5

)%

 

 

1.4

%

 

 

2.1

%

Subpart F income

 

 

1.5

%

 

 

0.6

%

 

 

0.5

%

 

 

(2.0

)%

 

 

3.2

%

 

 

7.0

%

Research and development tax credit

 

 

(1.1

)%

 

 

(0.8

)%

 

 

(0.6

)%

 

 

19.9

%

 

 

(9.3

)%

 

 

(11.8

)%

Section 199 Deduction

 

 

(1.4

)%

 

 

(1.8

)%

 

 

(1.5

)%

Stock compensation

 

 

11.8

%

 

 

1.8

%

 

 

5.8

%

GILTI, net of foreign tax credit

 

 

(1.1

)%

 

 

0.9

%

 

 

0.5

%

FDII

 

 

3.1

%

 

 

(1.9

)%

 

 

(4.5

)%

Transition Tax

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

(15.2

)%

Other permanent differences

 

 

1.7

%

 

 

0.9

%

 

 

0.7

%

 

 

(3.4

)%

 

 

1.3

%

 

 

3.0

%

Total

 

 

75.7

%

 

 

19.6

%

 

 

23.2

%

 

 

62.3

%

 

 

10.2

%

 

 

(9.9

)%

 

The Company’s U.S. and foreign effective tax rates for (loss) income before income taxes were as follows for the periods indicated:

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

U.S.

 

 

269.3

%

 

 

32.3

%

 

 

36.0

%

 

 

33.8

%

 

 

1.7

%

 

 

45.8

%

Foreign

 

 

6.3

%

 

 

9.1

%

 

 

10.5

%

 

 

16.7

%

 

 

13.2

%

 

 

16.4

%

Combined

 

 

75.7

%

 

 

19.6

%

 

 

23.2

%

 

 

62.3

%

 

 

10.2

%

 

 

(9.9

)%

98


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The change in the Company’s effective tax rate in 2017,2020, as compared to the prior year, was primarily due to an estimated one-time tax provisioncertain discrete items, overall income or loss level, and the change in the proportion of $44.0 million as a result of the Tax Act. This tax provision is comprised of a $40.3 million Transition Tax and a $3.7 million charge related to the re-measurement of net deferred tax assets arising from the new lower corporate tax rate effected by the Tax Act. U.S. versus foreign income.

 

94


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Tax Act imposesimposed a Transition Tax on previously untaxed accumulated and current earnings and profits (“E&P”) of certain foreign subsidiaries of the Company.  To determine the amountCompany’s foreign subsidiaries.  The Company recorded a final tax expense of $37.2 million related to the Transition Tax, the Company must determine, among other things, the amountcomprised of post-1986 E&P of the relevant subsidiaries, as well as the amount of non-U.S. income taxes paid on such earnings. The Company made a reasonable estimate of the Transition Tax and recorded a provisional Transition Tax obligation of $40.3 million in 2017 and a subsequent $(3.1) million measurement-period adjustment in 2018.  As of December 31, 2020, $28.0 million of the Transition Tax was unpaid, of which $36.8$25.1 million is recordedincluded in “other“Other long-term liabilities” and $3.0 million is included in “Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and operating lease liabilities” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. However, the Company continues to gather additional information to compute more precisely the post-1986 E&P and related non-U.S. income taxes paid.

 

The Tax Act also reduced the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018.  Consequently, the Company has recorded a decrease related to its U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities, with a corresponding net deferred income tax expense of $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 as a result of re-measuring net deferred tax assets at the new lower corporate tax rate of 21%.

Additionally, the Tax Act requires certain Global Intangible Low Taxed Income (“GILTI”) earned by a controlled foreign corporationscorporation (“CFCs”CFC”) to be included in the gross income of the CFCs’CFC’s U.S. shareholder.  GAAP allowsThe Company has elected the Company to either: (i) treat“period cost method” and treats taxes due on future U.S. inclusions in taxable income related to GILTI as a current-period expense when incurred (the “period cost method”); or (ii) factor such amounts intoincurred.  The Tax Act allows a U.S. corporation a deduction equal to a certain percentage of its measurement of deferred taxes (the “deferred method”foreign-derived intangible income (“FDII”).  The Company elected the period cost method.  The GILTI tax rules will become effective for the 2018 tax year and therefore the Company has not made any adjustments related to the potential GILTI tax in its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017.  The Company continues to evaluateestimated the impact of the new GILTI tax rules and the application of ASC 740 onFDII deduction in determining its financial statements.annual effective tax rate that is reflected in its (benefit from) provision for income taxes since January 1, 2018.

 

Except as discussed below, the Company intends to indefinitely reinvest its undistributed earnings of all of its foreign subsidiaries.   However, under the Tax Act, those undistributed earnings (as computed for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and with due regard to the discussion below regarding Subpart F deemed dividends) are subject to the Transition Tax, which was recorded at a provisional amount of $40.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2017.

In addition, U.S. federal tax laws require the Company to include in its U.S. taxable income certain investment income earned outside of the United States in excess of certain limits (“Subpart F deemed dividends”).  Because Subpart F deemed dividends are already required to be recognized in the Company’s U.S. federal income tax return, the Company regularly repatriates Subpart F deemed dividends to the United States and no additional tax is incurred on the distribution.  The Company repatriated Subpart F deemed dividends of $1.8 million and $1.9 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively, with no additional tax.  The Company did not repatriate any Subpart F deemed dividends in 2015 because it did not report any Subpart F income on its 2014 U.S. tax return.

As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the amount of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments held by the Company’s U.S. entities was $293.8$13.7 million and $279.8$289.4 million, respectively, and by the Company’s non-U.S. entities was $381.4$46.0 million and $309.6$276.2 million, respectively. If the cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments held by the Company’s non-U.S. entities were to be actually repatriated toThe Company earns a significant amount of its revenues outside the United States afterand its accumulated undistributed foreign earnings and profits as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 were $136.3 million and $231.2 million, respectively.  Beginning in the third quarter of 2020, the Company no longer intends to indefinitely reinvest its foreign earnings and profits. After taking into account the Transition Tax described above,and GILTI tax, the Company does not expect such repatriationrecorded tax expense of $1.7 million on undistributed foreign earnings related to generate any additionalforeign withholding tax and U.S. federal taxablestate income to the Company.taxes in 2020.

9599


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of the temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities (in thousands) were as follows for the periods indicated:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Deferred tax assets, net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating loss carryforwards

 

$

761

 

 

$

214

 

 

$

1,690

 

 

$

874

 

Tax credits

 

 

1,520

 

 

 

1,372

 

 

 

4,158

 

 

 

2,553

 

Intangible assets

 

 

10

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

1,707

 

 

 

1,878

 

Deferred revenue adjustment

 

 

3,351

 

 

 

3,305

 

 

 

408

 

 

 

423

 

Accrued compensation

 

 

2,863

 

 

 

7,866

 

 

 

6,527

 

 

 

6,257

 

Share-based compensation expense

 

 

11,597

 

 

 

11,440

 

 

 

11,410

 

 

 

14,182

 

Deferred rent

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,281

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,330

 

Digital asset impairment losses

 

 

19,843

 

 

 

0

 

Other

 

 

2,457

 

 

 

2,002

 

 

 

3,605

 

 

 

1,453

 

Deferred tax assets before valuation allowance

 

 

22,559

 

 

 

27,491

 

 

 

49,348

 

 

 

28,950

 

Valuation allowance

 

 

(1,015

)

 

 

(832

)

 

 

(1,259

)

 

 

(2,130

)

Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance

 

 

21,544

 

 

 

26,659

 

 

 

48,089

 

 

 

26,820

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prepaid expenses and other

 

 

684

 

 

 

1,098

 

 

 

1,792

 

 

 

1,693

 

Property and equipment

 

 

6,778

 

 

 

10,821

 

 

 

4,233

 

 

 

5,092

 

Capitalized software development costs

 

 

695

 

 

 

3,330

 

Debt discount, net of issuance costs

 

 

41,693

 

 

 

0

 

Deferred tax on undistributed foreign earnings

 

 

1,741

 

 

 

0

 

Method change

 

 

338

 

 

 

652

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

 

8,157

 

 

 

15,249

 

 

 

49,797

 

 

 

7,437

 

Total net deferred tax asset

 

$

13,387

 

 

$

11,410

 

Total net deferred tax (liability) asset

 

$

(1,708

)

 

$

19,383

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reported as:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-current deferred tax assets, net

 

 

13,391

 

 

 

11,704

 

 

 

6,503

 

 

 

19,409

 

Non-current deferred tax liabilities

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(294

)

 

 

(8,211

)

 

 

(26

)

Total net deferred tax asset

 

$

13,387

 

 

$

11,410

 

Total net deferred tax (liability) asset

 

$

(1,708

)

 

$

19,383

 

 

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had income taxes payable of $0.4 million and $10.5 million, respectively, recorded in “accounts payable and accrued expenses” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company had unrecognized income tax benefits of $4.0$4.6 million, recorded in “Other long-term liabilities” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The change in unrecognized income tax benefits (in thousands) is presented in the table below:

 

Unrecognized tax benefits at January 1, 2017

 

$

3,121

 

Unrecognized income tax benefits at January 1, 2020

 

$

1,563

 

Increase related to positions taken in prior period

 

 

771

 

 

 

2,580

 

Increase related to positions taken in current period

 

 

294

 

 

 

283

 

Decrease related to expiration of statute of limitations

 

 

(741

)

 

 

(133

)

Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2017

 

 

3,445

 

Unrecognized income tax benefits at December 31, 2020

 

 

4,293

 

Accrued interest

 

 

569

 

 

 

295

 

Unrecognized tax benefits recorded in other long-term liabilities at December 31, 2017

 

$

4,014

 

Unrecognized income tax benefits recorded in other long-term liabilities at December 31, 2020

 

$

4,588

 

 

100


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

If recognized, $3.5$4.3 million of the gross unrecognized income tax benefits would impact the Company’s effective tax rate.  Over the next 12 months, the amount of the Company’s liability for unrecognized income tax benefits shown above is not expected to change by a material amount.materially. The Company recognizes estimated accrued interest related to unrecognized income tax benefits in the provision forbenefit from income tax accounts.taxes. During the years ended December 31, 2017,

96


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2016,2020, 2019, and 2015,2018, the Company released or recognized an immaterial amount of accrued interest.  The amount of accumulated accrued interest related to the above unrecognized income tax benefits was approximately $0.6$0.3 million and $0.4$0.2 million as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.

The Company files tax returns in numerous foreign countries as well as the United States and its tax returns may be subject to audit by tax authorities in all countries in which it files.  Each country has its own statute of limitations for making assessment of additional tax liabilities. In 2017,2018, the Company settled the tax examination in GermanyChina for tax years 2008 to 2016 without any material audit assessments. In 2019, the Company settled the tax examination in Italy for tax years 2013 2014, andto 2015 without any material audit assessments. The Company’s U.S. tax returns for tax years from 20142016 and forward are subject to potential examination by the Internal Revenue Service.

  However, due to the Company’s use of state NOL carryovers in the United States, state tax authorities may attempt to reduce or fully offset the amount of state NOL carryovers from tax years ended 2011 and forward that the Company used in later tax years. The Company’s major foreign tax jurisdictions and the tax years that remain subject to potential examination are Italy, Germany, and Poland for tax years 2016 forward, Poland and China for tax years 2013 forward,forward; Spain for tax years 20142017 and forward, and the United Kingdom for tax years 20162019 and forward.  To date there have been no material audit assessments related to audits in the United States or any of the applicable foreign jurisdictions.

The Company had no0 U.S. net operating loss (“NOL”)NOL carryforwards as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019. The Company had $2.5$7.9 million and $0.7$4.1 million of foreign NOL carryforwards as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.

The Company’s valuation allowances of $1.0$1.3 million and $0.8$2.1 million at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively, primarily relate to certain foreign tax credit carryforward tax assets. The Company assessed whether its valuation allowance analyses are affected by various aspects ofassets that, in the Tax Act (e.g., deemed repatriation of deferred foreign income, GILTI inclusions, new categories of foreign tax credits) and concluded that they wereCompany’s present estimation, more likely than not significantly affected by the Tax Act.  will not be realized.

In determining the Company’s provision for or benefit from(benefit from) income taxes, net deferred tax assets, liabilities, and valuation allowances, management is required to make judgmentsestimates and estimatesjudgments related to projections of domestic and foreign profitability, the timing and extent of the utilization of NOL carryforwards, applicable tax rates, transfer pricing methods, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. As a multinational company, the Company is required to calculate and provide for estimated income tax liabilities for each of the tax jurisdictions in which it operates. This process involves estimating current tax obligations and exposures in each jurisdiction, as well as making judgments regarding the future recoverability of deferred tax assets. Changes in the estimated level of annual pre-tax income, changes in tax laws, particularly changes related to the utilization of NOLs in various jurisdictions, and changes resulting from tax audits can all affect the overall effective income tax rate which, in turn, impacts the overall level of income tax expense or benefit and net income.

JudgmentsEstimates and estimatesjudgments related to the Company’s projections and assumptions are inherently uncertain. Therefore, actual results could differ materially from projections. The timing and manner in which the Company will use research and development tax credit carryforward tax assets, alternative minimum tax credit carryforward tax assets, and foreign tax credit carryforward tax assets in any year, or in total, may be limited by provisions of the Internal Revenue Code regarding changes in the Company’s ownership. Currently, the Company expects to use theits deferred tax assets, subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations, within the carryforward periods. Valuation allowances have been established where the Company has concluded that it is more likely than not that such deferred tax assets are not realizable.  If the Company is unable to sustainregain profitability in future periods, it may be required to increase the valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets, which could result in a charge that would materially adversely affect net (loss) income in the period in which the charge is incurred.  

Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code provides an annual limitation on the amount of federal NOLs and tax credits that may be used in the event of an ownership change. The limitation is based on, among other things, the value of the company as of the change date multiplied by a U.S. federal long-term tax exempt interest rate. The Company does not currently expect the limitations under the Section 382 ownership change rules to impact the Company’s ability to use its NOL carryforwards or tax credits that existed as of the date of the ownership change.

97


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(11)(12) Share-based Compensation

The 2013 Equity Plan authorizes the issuance of various types of share-based awards to the Company’s employees, officers, directors, and other eligible participants.  As of December 31, 2017, the2020, a total number of 2,300,000 shares of the Company’s class A common stock were authorized for issuance under the 2013 Equity Plan was 1,700,000 shares.

During 2017, stock options to purchase an aggregate of 175,000 shares of class A common stock were granted to certain Company employees and directors pursuant to the 2013 Equity Plan. As of December 31, 2017, there were options to purchase 991,633 shares of class A common stock outstanding under the 2013 Equity Plan. As of December 31, 2017,2020, there were 485,000 remaining415,238 shares of class A common stock authorizedreserved and available for future issuance under the 2013 Equity Plan.

Shares101


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Under the 2013 Equity Plan, the Company has issued stock option awards, restricted stock units, and other stock-based awards. Regardless of the type of award issued, any shares issued under the 2013 Equity Plan may consist in whole or in part of authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares.  No awards may be issued more than ten10 years after the 2013 Equity Plan’s effective date.  In determining related share-based compensation expense for any award under the 2013 Equity Plan, the Company has made an accounting policy election to account for forfeitures of awards as they occur and therefore share-based compensation expense presented below has not been adjusted for any estimated forfeitures.

Stock option awards

Stock options that are granted under the 2013 Equity Plan must have an exercise price equal to at least the fair market value of the Company’s class A common stock on the date of grant, become exercisable as established by the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee, and expire no later than ten10 years following the date of grant.  The Company recognizes share-based compensation expense associated with such stock option awards on a straight-line basis over the award’s requisite service period (generally, the vesting period).  The stock option awards granted to date vest in equal annual installments over an approximately four-year vesting period (unless accelerated uponin connection with a change in control event (as definedunder specified conditions as set forth in the stockapplicable option agreement for the applicable award) or otherwise in accordance with provisions of the 2013 Equity Plan or applicable option agreement). 

Share-based compensation expense related to stock option awards is based on the fair value of the stock option awards on the date of grant, as estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.  The Black-Scholes option pricing model requires the input of certain management assumptions, including the expected term, expected stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate, and expected dividend yield.  The Company estimates the term over which option holders are expected to hold their stock options by using the simplified method for “plain-vanilla” stock option awards because the Company’s stock option exercise history does not provide a reasonable basis to compute the expected term for stock options granted under the 2013 Equity Plan.  The Company relieshas relied exclusively on its historical stock price volatility to estimate the expected stock price volatility over the expected term because the Company believesbelieved at the date of grant that future volatility iswas unlikely to differ from the past. In estimating the expected stock price volatility, the Company uses a simple average calculation method.  The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury securities with terms that approximate the expected term of the stock options.  The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s past cash dividend history and anticipated future cash dividend payments.  The expected dividend yield is zero,0, as the Company has not previously declared cash dividends and does not currently intend to declare cash dividends in the foreseeable future.  These assumptions are based on management’s best judgment, and changes to these assumptions could materially affect the fair value estimates and amount of share-based compensation expense recognized.

98102


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

As of December 31, 2020, there were options to purchase 1,157,375 shares of class A common stock outstanding under the 2013 Equity Plan. The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activity (in thousands, except per share data and years) for the periods indicated:

 

 

Stock Options Outstanding

 

Stock Options Outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average

 

 

Aggregate

 

 

Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average

 

 

Aggregate

 

 

Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

Exercise Price

 

 

Intrinsic

 

 

Remaining Contractual

 

 

 

 

 

Exercise Price

 

 

Intrinsic

 

 

Remaining Contractual

 

Shares

 

 

Per Share

 

 

Value

 

 

Term (Years)

 

Shares

 

 

Per Share

 

 

Value

 

 

Term (Years)

Balance as of January 1, 2015

 

 

1,201

 

 

$

111.77

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of January 1, 2018

 

 

992

 

 

$

145.28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

380

 

 

 

178.93

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

710

 

 

 

130.27

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(91

)

 

 

105.25

 

 

$

6,367

 

 

 

 

 

(21

)

 

 

121.13

 

 

$

196

 

 

 

Forfeited/Expired

 

 

(167

)

 

 

131.31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(201

)

 

 

154.49

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2015

 

 

1,323

 

 

 

129.04

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2018

 

 

1,480

 

 

 

137.16

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

45

 

 

189.62

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

470

 

 

 

150.88

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(112

)

 

97.82

 

 

$

8,102

 

 

 

 

 

(51

)

 

 

128.17

 

 

$

799

 

 

 

Forfeited/Expired

 

 

(370

)

 

110.28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(265

)

 

 

135.88

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2016

 

 

886

 

 

 

143.89

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2019

 

 

1,634

 

 

 

141.60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

175

 

 

 

169.04

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

118

 

 

 

146.76

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(12

)

 

 

143.35

 

 

$

541

 

 

 

 

 

(348

)

 

 

146.80

 

 

$

29,994

 

 

 

Forfeited/Expired

 

 

(57

)

 

 

196.52

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(247

)

 

 

146.63

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2017

 

 

992

 

 

$

145.28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercisable as of December 31, 2017

 

 

536

 

 

$

135.48

 

 

$

3,941

 

 

6.6

Expected to vest as of December 31, 2017

 

 

456

 

 

$

156.79

 

 

 

1,409

 

 

7.9

Balance as of December 31, 2020

 

 

1,157

 

 

$

139.48

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercisable as of December 31, 2020

 

 

644

 

 

$

135.05

 

 

$

163,318

 

 

4.1

Expected to vest as of December 31, 2020

 

 

513

 

 

$

145.05

 

 

 

124,947

 

 

8.4

Total

 

 

992

 

 

$

145.28

 

 

$

5,350

 

 

7.2

 

 

1,157

 

 

$

139.48

 

 

$

288,265

 

 

6.0

 

Stock options outstanding as of December 31, 20172020 are comprised of the following range of exercise prices per share (in thousands, except per share data and years):

 

 

Stock Options Outstanding at December 31, 2017

 

 

Stock Options Outstanding at December 31, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average

 

 

Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average

 

 

Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercise Price

 

 

Remaining Contractual

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercise Price

 

 

Remaining Contractual

 

Range of Exercise Prices per Share

 

Shares

 

 

Per Share

 

 

Term (Years)

 

 

Shares

 

 

Per Share

 

 

Term (Years)

 

$117.85 - $120.00

 

 

25

 

 

$

118.55

 

 

 

6.3

 

$120.01 - $150.00

 

 

570

 

 

$

122.67

 

 

 

6.7

 

$150.01 - $180.00

 

 

202

 

 

$

167.50

 

 

 

7.2

 

$121.43 - $140.00

 

 

710

 

 

$

124.45

 

 

 

4.8

 

$140.01 - $160.00

 

 

268

 

 

$

151.33

 

 

 

9.0

 

$160.01 - $180.00

 

 

69

 

 

$

169.37

 

 

 

6.8

 

$180.01 - $201.25

 

 

195

 

 

$

191.78

 

 

 

8.7

 

 

 

110

 

 

$

188.97

 

 

 

6.0

 

Total

 

 

992

 

 

$

145.28

 

 

 

7.2

 

 

 

1,157

 

 

$

139.48

 

 

 

6.0

 

 

An aggregate of 215,000, 222,500,200,000, 216,250, and 283,750251,250 stock options with an aggregate fair value of $13.0$11.2 million, $13.7$12.6 million, and $14.2$15.5 million vested during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015,2018, respectively.  Beginning January 1, 2017, the Company made an accounting policy election to prospectively account for forfeitures as they occur.  Therefore, share-based compensation expense has not been adjusted for any estimated forfeitures. Prior periods have not been restated.  

The weighted average grant date fair value of stock option awards using the Black-Scholes option pricing model was $68.67, $75.54,$49.68, $54.36, and $73.86$51.68 for each share subject to a stock option granted during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015,2018, respectively, based on the following assumptions:

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2020

 

2019

 

2018

Expected term of options in years

 

6.3

 

6.3

 

6.3

 

6.3

 

6.3

 

6.3

Expected volatility

 

37.4% - 37.8%

 

38.5%

 

39.0% - 40.2%

 

33.6% - 34.6%

 

33.2% - 33.4%

 

33.7% - 35.5%

Risk-free interest rate

 

1.9% - 2.3%

 

1.4% - 1.6%

 

1.5% - 2.0%

 

0.3% - 0.5%

 

1.7% - 2.5%

 

2.7% - 2.9%

Expected dividend yield

 

0.0%

 

0.0%

 

0.0%

 

0.0%

 

0.0%

 

0.0%

99

103


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

The Company recognized approximately $14.3$10.1 million, $11.8$10.1 million, and $17.3$14.6 million in share-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015,2018, respectively, from stock options granted under the 2013 Equity Plan. As of December 31, 2017,2020, there was approximately $19.8$21.8 million of total unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to unvested stock options.  As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company expectedexpects to recognize this remaining share-based compensation expense over a weighted-averageweighted average vesting period of approximately 2.32.6 years.  

Restricted stock units

During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015,fourth quarter of 2020, the Company was able to recognize and utilize tax deductions related to equity compensation in excess of compensation recognized for financial reporting that was generatedbegan granting restricted stock units under the 2013 Equity Plan. Accordingly, additional paid-in capital increased by $1.2 million and $1.1 million duringThe restricted stock units entitle recipients to receive a number of shares of the years endedCompany’s class A common stock over a vesting period, as specified in the applicable restricted stock unit agreement. Although the Company may in its sole discretion elect to pay fully or partially in cash in lieu of settling solely in shares, it does not currently intend to do so.

Share-based compensation expense related to restricted stock units is based on the fair value of the Company’s class A common stock on the date of grant. The Company recognizes share-based compensation expense associated with such restricted stock unit awards on a straight-line basis over the award’s requisite service period (generally, the vesting period).  The restricted stock unit awards granted to date vest in equal annual installments over a four-year period (unless accelerated in connection with a change in control event under specified conditions as set forth in the applicable restricted stock unit agreement or otherwise in accordance with provisions of the 2013 Equity Plan or applicable restricted stock unit agreement).  

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Beginning January 1, 2017, excess tax benefits are no longer recognized as additional paid-in capital; instead they are prospectively included within2020, there were 74,400 restricted stock units outstanding under the provision2013 Equity Plan.  The following table summarizes the Company’s restricted stock unit activity (in thousands) for income taxes.  Priorthe periods have not been restated.indicated:

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company wrote off $1.7 million of deferred tax assets related to certain

 

 

Restricted Stock Units Outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aggregate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intrinsic

 

 

 

Units

 

 

Value

 

Balance as of January 1, 2020

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

76

 

 

 

 

 

Vested

 

 

0

 

 

$

0

 

Forfeited

 

 

(2

)

 

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2020

 

 

74

 

 

 

 

 

Expected to vest as of December 31, 2020

 

 

74

 

 

$

28,908

 

NaN restricted stock units vested stock options that were no longer exercisable. Accordingly, additional paid-in capital decreased by $1.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2016.  No such adjustment was made during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2015. 

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company paid $3.7 million to tax authorities related to the net exercise2020. The weighted average grant date fair value of arestricted stock option under the 2013 Equity Plan.  This payment resulted in a $3.7 million reduction to additional paid-in capitalunits granted during the year ended December 31, 2016.   No net exercises2020 was $192.43 based on the fair value of the Company’s class A common stock. The Company recognized approximately $0.5 million in share-based compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2020 from restricted stock units granted under the 2013 Equity Plan.  As of December 31, 2020, there was approximately $13.8 million of total unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock units. As of December 31, 2020, the Company expects to recognize this remaining share-based compensation expense over a weighted average vesting period of approximately 3.9 years.

104


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Other stock-based awards

During 2018, the Company granted certain awards characterized as “other stock-based awards” under the 2013 Equity Plan.  These other stock-based awards are similar to stock options, except these awards are settled in cash only and not in shares of the Company’s class A common stock.  These awards are classified as liabilities in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets due to the required cash settlement feature and the fair value of the awards is remeasured each quarterly reporting period.  Other stock-based awards were made during0t granted in 2020 or 2019.

The Company recognized approximately $0.6 million in share-based compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2020 from other stock-based awards. For the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 2015.2018, the Company did 0t recognize a material amount in share-based compensation expense from other stock-based awards. As of December 31, 2020, there was approximately $1.0 million of total unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to other stock-based awards. The Company expects to recognize this remaining share-based compensation expense over a weighted average vesting period of approximately 1.4 years, subject to additional fair value adjustments through the earlier of settlement or expiration.

 

 

(12)(13) Basic and Diluted Earnings per Share

Potential shares of common stock are included in the diluted earnings per share calculation when dilutive.  Potential shares of common stock, consisting of class A common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options, class A common stock issuable upon vesting of restricted stock units, and class A common stock issuable upon conversion of the Notes (as to which the Company currently intends to settle the principal in cash and excess value in shares of class A common stock) are calculated using the treasury stock method.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share data) for the periods indicated:

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

17,643

 

 

$

90,908

 

 

$

105,931

 

 

$

(7,524

)

 

$

34,355

 

 

$

22,501

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares of class A common stock

 

 

9,409

 

 

 

9,390

 

 

 

9,320

 

 

 

7,658

 

 

 

8,221

 

 

 

9,340

 

Weighted average common shares of class B common stock

 

 

2,035

 

 

 

2,035

 

 

 

2,035

 

 

 

2,026

 

 

 

2,035

 

 

 

2,035

 

Total weighted average common stock shares outstanding

 

 

11,444

 

 

 

11,425

 

 

 

11,355

 

 

 

9,684

 

 

 

10,256

 

 

 

11,375

 

Effect of dilutive securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employee stock options

 

 

103

 

 

 

91

 

 

 

184

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

72

 

 

 

37

 

Adjusted weighted average shares

 

 

11,547

 

 

 

11,516

 

 

 

11,539

 

 

 

9,684

 

 

 

10,328

 

 

 

11,412

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share

 

$

1.54

 

 

$

7.96

 

 

$

9.33

 

 

$

(0.78

)

 

$

3.35

 

 

$

1.98

 

Diluted earnings per share

 

$

1.53

 

 

$

7.89

 

 

$

9.18

 

 

$

(0.78

)

 

$

3.33

 

 

$

1.97

 

 

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015,2018, stock options issued under the 2013 Equity Plan to purchase a weighted average of approximately 398,000, 391,000,1,487,000, 933,000, and 262,000896,000 shares of class A common stock,

100


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

respectively, were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation because their impact would have been anti-dilutive. For the year ended December 31, 2020, restricted stock units issued under the 2013 Equity Plan to issue a weighted average of approximately 10,000 shares of class A common stock were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation because their impact would have been anti-dilutive. For the year-ended December 31, 2020, the average market price of the Company’s class A common stock did not exceed the conversion price of the Notes and therefore there is no dilutive impact to earnings per share arising from the Notes.

 

 

(13)105


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(14) Treasury Stock

The Board of Directors has authorized the Company’s repurchase of up to an aggregate of $800.0 million of its class A common stock from time to time on the open market through April 29, 2018 (the “20052023 under the Share Repurchase Program”),Program, although the program may be suspended or discontinued by the Company at any time.  The timing and amount of any shares repurchased will be determined by the Company’s management based on its evaluation of market conditions and other factors.  The 2005 Share Repurchase Program may be funded using the Company’s working capital, as well as proceeds from any other funding arrangements that the Company may enter into in the future.  As of December 31, 2017,During 2020, the Company had repurchased an aggregate of 3,826,947444,769 shares of its class A common stock at an average price per share of $90.23$139.12 and an aggregate cost of $345.3$61.9 million pursuant to the 2005Share Repurchase Program.  During 2019, the Company repurchased an aggregate of 521,843 shares of its class A common stock at an average price per share of $139.35 and an aggregate cost of $72.7 million pursuant to the Share Repurchase Program.   During 2018, the Company repurchased an aggregate of 880,667 shares of its class A common stock at an average price per share of $126.02 and an aggregate cost of $111.0 million pursuant to the Share Repurchase Program.  As of December 31, 2020, the Company had repurchased an aggregate of 5,674,226 shares of its class A common stock at an average price per share of $104.13 and an aggregate cost of $590.9 million pursuant to the Share Repurchase Program.  As of December 31, 2020, $209.1 million of the Company’s class A common stock remained available for repurchase pursuant to the Share Repurchase Program.  The average price per share and aggregate cost amounts disclosed above include broker commissions.

On August 11, 2020, the Company announced that it commenced an offer to purchase up to $250.0 million in value of shares of its issued and outstanding class A common stock, or such lesser number of shares as are properly tendered and not properly withdrawn, at a price not greater than $140.00 nor less than $122.00 per share (the “Offer”). The Offer expired at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on September 10, 2020. During the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015,2020, the Company did not repurchase anyrepurchased an aggregate of 432,313 shares of its class A common stock pursuantthrough the Offer at a price of $140.00 per share for an aggregate cost of $61.3 million, inclusive of $0.8 million in certain fees and expenses related to the 2005 Share Repurchase Program.Offer.

 

 

(14)(15) Employee Benefit Plan

The Company sponsors a benefit plan to provide retirement benefits for its employees, known as the MicroStrategy 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Plan”“401(k) Plan”). Participants may make voluntary contributions to the 401(k) Plan of up to 50% of their annual base pre-tax compensation, cash bonuses, and commissions not to exceed the federally determined maximum allowable contribution amounts. Participants may designate all or a portion of the 401(k) Plan elective deferral contributions as Roth elective deferral contributions instead of pre-tax elective deferral contributions. The 401(k) Plan permits for discretionary Company contributions.  

The Company currently makes a matching contribution to each 401(k) Plan participant in the amount of 50% of the first 12% of a participant’s contributions, up to a maximum of $5,000 per year.  Further, all active participants become fully vested in the Company’s matching contributions after completing four years of employment, vesting in increments based on the participant’s years of employment with the Company.  Prior to 2019, the Company made matching contributions in the amount of 50% of the first 6% of a participant’s contributions, up to a maximum of $3,000 per year.  A participant vestsyear, and participants became fully vested in the Company’s matching contributions after completing six years of employment, vesting in increments based on the participant’s years of employment bywith the Company, becoming fully vested after completing six years of employment.  Company.  

The Company made contributions to the 401(k) Plan totaling $2.1$3.3 million, $1.9$4.1 million, and $1.6$2.4 million during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015,2018, respectively.

 

106


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

(15)NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(16) Segment Information

The Company manages its business in one1 reportable operating segment.  The Company’s one reportable operating segment is engaged in the design, development, marketing, and sales of its enterprise intelligence software platform through licensing arrangements and cloud-basedcloud subscriptions and related services.  The following table presents total revenues, gross profit, and long-lived assets, excluding long-term deferred tax assets, (in thousands) according to geographic region:

 

Geographic regions:

 

Domestic

 

 

EMEA

 

 

Other Regions

 

 

Consolidated

 

 

Domestic

 

 

EMEA

 

 

Other Regions

 

 

Consolidated

 

Year ended December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

 

$

292,930

 

 

$

154,567

 

 

$

57,046

 

 

$

504,543

 

 

$

279,220

 

 

$

155,478

 

 

$

46,037

 

 

$

480,735

 

Gross profit

 

$

233,945

 

 

$

126,147

 

 

$

47,802

 

 

$

407,894

 

 

$

229,466

 

 

$

124,513

 

 

$

35,701

 

 

$

389,680

 

Year ended December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

 

$

310,972

 

 

$

150,422

 

 

$

50,767

 

 

$

512,161

 

 

$

273,581

 

 

$

159,643

 

 

$

53,103

 

 

$

486,327

 

Gross profit

 

$

253,234

 

 

$

122,865

 

 

$

42,915

 

 

$

419,014

 

 

$

216,365

 

 

$

126,939

 

 

$

43,049

 

 

$

386,353

 

Year ended December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

 

$

326,792

 

 

$

153,658

 

 

$

49,419

 

 

$

529,869

 

 

$

287,258

 

 

$

156,706

 

 

$

53,674

 

 

$

497,638

 

Gross profit

 

$

265,438

 

 

$

121,148

 

 

$

42,175

 

 

$

428,761

 

 

$

228,310

 

 

$

126,315

 

 

$

43,514

 

 

$

398,139

 

As of December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-lived assets

 

$

53,102

 

 

$

4,108

 

 

$

1,516

 

 

$

58,726

 

 

$

1,165,283

 

 

$

11,441

 

 

$

9,765

 

 

$

1,186,489

 

As of December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-lived assets

 

$

67,031

 

 

$

3,256

 

 

$

1,341

 

 

$

71,628

 

 

$

118,168

 

 

$

13,636

 

 

$

11,912

 

 

$

143,716

 

 

The domestic region consists of the United States and Canada.  The EMEA region includes operations in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.  The other regions include all other foreign countries, generally comprising Latin

101


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

America and the Asia Pacific region.  For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015, no2018, 0 individual foreign country accounted for 10% or more of total consolidated revenues.

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015, no2018, 0 individual customer accounted for 10% or more of total consolidated revenues.

As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016, no2019, 0 individual foreign country accounted for 10% or more of total consolidated assets.

 

(17) Sale of Domain Name

(16)On May 30, 2019, the Company completed the sale of its Voice.com domain name for consideration of $30.0 million in cash (the “Domain Name Sale”).  As of the date of the Domain Name Sale, the Company had 0 unamortized costs associated with the Voice.com domain name asset.  The Company did not incur any material costs related to the Domain Name Sale. The Domain Name Sale resulted in a gain of $29.8 million in the second quarter of 2019, which was recorded as “Other income, net” for such quarter in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.  The Company also recorded a discrete $8.1 million tax provision in the second quarter of 2019 related to the Domain Name Sale.

107


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(18) Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

The following tables contain unaudited Statement of Operations information for each quarter of 20172020 and 2016.2019. During the third and fourth quarters of 2020, the Company recorded impairment losses on its digital assets of $44.2 million and $26.5 million, respectively. During the second quarter of 2017,2019, the Company estimated and recorded a one-timegain of $29.8 million and an associated discrete tax provision of $44.0$8.1 million as a result of the Tax Act. This tax provision is comprised of a $40.3 million Transition Tax and a $3.7 million charge related to the re-measurement of net deferred tax assets arising from the new lower corporate tax rate effected by the Tax Act. During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company reversed the accrual for potential future payments in connection with the departure from the Company of two executives in connection with an executive management reorganization in January 2016, which resulted in a $3.4 million increase in net income. The operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period.Domain Name Sale.  

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31

 

 

June 30

 

 

September 30

 

 

December 31

 

 

Year

 

 

March 31

 

 

June 30

 

 

September 30

 

 

December 31

 

 

Year

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

120,576

 

 

$

120,610

 

 

$

125,212

 

 

$

138,145

 

 

$

504,543

 

 

$

111,424

 

 

$

110,584

 

 

$

127,408

 

 

$

131,319

 

 

$

480,735

 

Gross profit

 

$

97,444

 

 

$

96,235

 

 

$

100,823

 

 

$

113,392

 

 

$

407,894

 

 

$

86,879

 

 

$

86,595

 

 

$

105,672

 

 

$

110,534

 

 

$

389,680

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

14,867

 

 

$

11,076

 

 

$

17,924

 

 

$

(26,224

)

 

$

17,643

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

657

 

 

$

3,387

 

 

$

(14,229

)

 

$

2,661

 

 

$

(7,524

)

Earnings (loss) per share:(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

1.30

 

 

$

0.97

 

 

$

1.57

 

 

$

(2.29

)

 

$

1.54

 

 

$

0.07

 

 

$

0.35

 

 

$

(1.48

)

 

$

0.28

 

 

$

(0.78

)

Diluted

 

$

1.28

 

 

$

0.96

 

 

$

1.56

 

 

$

(2.29

)

 

$

1.53

 

 

$

0.07

 

 

$

0.35

 

 

$

(1.48

)

 

$

0.27

 

 

$

(0.78

)

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31

 

 

June 30

 

 

September 30

 

 

December 31

 

 

Year

 

 

March 31

 

 

June 30

 

 

September 30

 

 

December 31

 

 

Year

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

119,015

 

 

$

123,142

 

 

$

129,896

 

 

$

140,108

 

 

$

512,161

 

 

$

115,366

 

 

$

117,737

 

 

$

119,693

 

 

$

133,531

 

 

$

486,327

 

Gross profit

 

$

96,192

 

 

$

99,041

 

 

$

106,961

 

 

$

116,820

 

 

$

419,014

 

 

$

89,193

 

 

$

92,387

 

 

$

95,878

 

 

$

108,895

 

 

$

386,353

 

Net income

 

$

14,272

 

 

$

18,884

 

 

$

26,628

 

 

$

31,124

 

 

$

90,908

 

Earnings per share:(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(7,906

)

 

$

20,394

 

 

$

9,700

 

 

$

12,167

 

 

$

34,355

 

(Loss) earnings per share:(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

1.25

 

 

$

1.65

 

 

$

2.33

 

 

$

2.72

 

 

$

7.96

 

 

$

(0.77

)

 

$

1.99

 

 

$

0.95

 

 

$

1.19

 

 

$

3.35

 

Diluted

 

$

1.24

 

 

$

1.64

 

 

$

2.31

 

 

$

2.69

 

 

$

7.89

 

 

$

(0.77

)

 

$

1.98

 

 

$

0.94

 

 

$

1.18

 

 

$

3.33

 

 

(1)

The sum of the basic and diluted earnings (loss) earnings per share for the four quarters may differ from annual earnings (loss) per share as the weighted-averageweighted average shares outstanding are computed independently for each of the quarters presented.

 

(17)(19) Subsequent Events

 

In January 2018,During February 2021, the Company entered into an agreementadopted the 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2021 ESPP”).  The purpose of the 2021 ESPP is to amendprovide eligible employees of the Company and certain of its corporate headquarters office lease.  The amendment extends the existing lease expiration date from December 2020subsidiaries with opportunities to December 2030 and provides for certain tenant allowances and incentives. Before tenant allowances and incentives,purchase shares of the Company’s annual base rent is expected to range from approximately $10.0 million to $13.0 million duringclass A common stock, commencing at such time and on such dates as the twelve-year lease term.Board of Directors of the Company shall determine.  An aggregate of 100,000 shares of the Company’s class A common stock has been authorized for issuance under the 2021 ESPP.

 

 


INDEX TO EXHIBITS

 

Exhibit

Number

 

Description

 

 

 

3.1

 

Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the registrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 000-24435)).

 

 

 

3.2

 

Amended and Restated By-Laws of the registrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 30, 2015 (File No. 000-24435)).

 

 

 

4.1

 

Form of Certificate of Class A Common Stock of the registrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003 (File No. 000-24435)).

 

 

 

  4.2

Description of the registrant’s registered securities (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 (File No. 000-24435)).

  4.3

Indenture, dated as of December 11. 2020, by and between the registrant and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 11, 2020 (File No. 000-24435)).

  4.4

Form of 0.750% Convertible Senior Note due 2025 (included within Exhibit 4.3 incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 11, 2020 (File No. 000-24435)).

10.1†

 

MicroStrategy Incorporated 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 9, 2013 (File No. 000-24435)).

 

 

 

10.2†

 

Amendment No. 1 to the MicroStrategy Incorporated 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 28, 2014 (File No. 000-24435)).

 

 

 

10.3†

 

Amendment No. 2 to the MicroStrategy Incorporated 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on July 25, 2014 (File No. 333-197645)).

 

 

 

10.4†

 

Amendment No. 3 to the MicroStrategy Incorporated 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 26, 2015 (File No. 000-24435)).

 

 

 

10.5†

 

Amendment No.  4 to the MicroStrategy Incorporated 2013 Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement (incorporatedIncentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.210.4 to the registrant’s CurrentQuarterly Report on Form 8-K filed with10-Q for the SEC on September 9, 2013fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2018 (File No. 000-24435)).

 

 

 

10.6†

 

2013 Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 9, 2013 (File No. 000-24435)).

10.7†

2016 Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2016 (File No. 000-24435)).

 

 

 

10.7†10.8†

 

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement.

10.9†

Summary of Perquisites and Associated Other Compensation Arrangements for Named Executive Officers (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (File No. 000-24435)).

 

 

 


10.8†10.10†

 

Summary of Director Fees and Perquisites and Associated Other Compensation Arrangements for Non-Employee Directors (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2014 (File No. 000-24435)).

 

 

 

10.9†10.11†

 

Sublease Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2011, by and between the Company and Aeromar Management Company, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (File No. 000-24435)).

 

 

 

10.10†10.12†

 

Material Terms for Payment of Certain Executive Incentive Compensation (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2015 (File No. 000-24435)).

10.11†

Summary of Designated Company Vehicles Policy (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007 (File No. 000-24435)).

 

 

 


10.12†10.13†

 

Amended and Restated Performance Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 28, 2012 (File No. 000-24435)).

10.13†

Summary of Salary and Annual Cash Bonus Target Determinations for Phong Q. Le and Timothy E. Lang (incorporated herein by reference to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 24, 2017 (File No. 000-24435)).

 

 

 

10.14†

 

Summary of CompensationCash Bonus and Salary Determinations for David J. Rennyson and W. Ming Shao (incorporatedCertain Executive Officers (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Part II Item 9B of the registrant’s QuarterlyAnnual Report on Form 10-Q10-K for the fiscal quarteryear ended MarchDecember 31, 20172019 (File No. 000-24435)).

 

 

 

10.15†

 

2017 SeniorSummary of Annual Discretionary Cash Bonus Targets for Certain Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales Compensation Plan (incorporatedOfficers (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Part II Item 5 of the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 20172020 (File No. 000-24435)).

 

 

 

10.16†

 

SummaryAgreement, dated as of 2017 Cash Bonus Determinations for Executive Officers (incorporatedApril 26, 2020, by and between the registrant and Lisa Mayr (incorporated herein by reference to Item 5.02 ofExhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s CurrentQuarterly Report on Form 8-K filed with10-Q for the SEC on January 25, 2018fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2020 (File No. 000-24435)).

 

 

 

10.17†

 

Summary of Compensation for Stephen H. Holdridge.MicroStrategy Incorporated 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on February 1, 2021 (File No. 333-252608)).

 

 

 

21.1

 

Subsidiaries of the registrant.

 

 

 

23.1

 

Consent of KPMG LLP.

 

 

 

31.1

 

Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Chairman of the Board of Directors President & Chief Executive Officer.

 

 

 

31.2

 

Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Senior Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer.

 

 

 

32.1

 

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

101.INS

 

Inline XBRL Instance Document. The instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.

 

 

 

101.SCH

 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.

 

 

 

101.CAL

 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.

 

 

 

101.DEF

 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.

 

 

 

101.LAB

 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.

 

 

 

101.PRE

 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.

104

Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL with applicable taxonomy extension information contained in Exhibits 101).

 

Management contracts and compensatory plans or arrangements.

Management contracts and compensatory plans or arrangements.

 


SIGNATURES

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

MicroStrategy Incorporated

 

(Registrant)

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Michael J. Saylor

 

 

Name:

Michael J. Saylor

 

 

Title:

Chairman of the Board of Directors

 

 

 

President & Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

 

Date: February 7, 201812, 2021

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Name

 

Position

 

Date

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Michael J. Saylor

 

Chairman of the Board of Directors President & Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

 

February 7, 201812, 2021

Michael J. Saylor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Phong Le

Phong Le

 

Senior Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

February 7, 201812, 2021

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Robert H. EpsteinJeanine Montgomery

Jeanine Montgomery

 

DirectorSenior Vice President & Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

 

February 7, 2018

Robert H. Epstein

12, 2021

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Stephen X. Graham

 

Director

 

February 7, 201812, 2021

Stephen X. Graham

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Jarrod M. Patten

 

Director

 

February 7, 201812, 2021

Jarrod M. Patten

/s/ Leslie Rechan

Director

February 12, 2021

Leslie Rechan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Carl J. Rickertsen

 

Director

 

February 7, 201812, 2021

Carl J. Rickertsen

 

 

 

 

 

 


SCHEDULE II

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 20152018

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Balance at the

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at

 

 

 

beginning of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

the end of

 

 

 

the period

 

 

Additions (1)

 

 

Deductions

 

 

the period

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2017

 

$

3,181

 

 

 

2,269

 

 

 

(1,260

)

 

$

4,190

 

December 31, 2016

 

$

3,825

 

 

 

224

 

 

 

(868

)

 

$

3,181

 

December 31, 2015

 

$

4,412

 

 

 

884

 

 

 

(1,471

)

 

$

3,825

 

Deferred tax valuation allowance:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2017

 

$

832

 

 

 

183

 

 

 

0

 

 

$

1,015

 

December 31, 2016

 

$

1,984

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

(1,172

)

 

$

832

 

December 31, 2015

 

$

2,311

 

 

 

75

 

 

 

(402

)

 

$

1,984

 

 

 

Balance at the

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at

 

 

 

beginning of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

the end of

 

 

 

the period

 

 

Additions (1)

 

 

Deductions

 

 

the period

 

Allowance for credit losses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

$

1,637

 

 

 

1,550

 

 

 

(427

)

 

$

2,760

 

December 31, 2019

 

$

5,489

 

 

 

124

 

 

 

(3,976

)

 

$

1,637

 

December 31, 2018

 

$

4,190

 

 

 

1,912

 

 

 

(613

)

 

$

5,489

 

Deferred tax valuation allowance:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

$

2,130

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

(881

)

 

$

1,259

 

December 31, 2019

 

$

1,507

 

 

 

633

 

 

 

(10

)

 

$

2,130

 

December 31, 2018

 

$

1,015

 

 

 

492

 

 

 

0

 

 

$

1,507

 

 

(1)

Reductions in/charges to revenues and expenses.

 

 

106112