UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172019

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM                      TO                     

Commission File Number 001-38017

 

SNAP INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

Delaware

45-5452795

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

63 Market Street, Venice,2772 Donald Douglas Loop North, Santa Monica, California 9029190405

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(310) 399-3339

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

Class A Common Stock, par value $0.00001 per share

SNAP

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES Yes  No  NO 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. YES Yes  NO  No 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES Yes  NO  No 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES Yes  NO  No 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company”company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer

 

  

Accelerated filer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer

 

  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

  

Smaller reporting company

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Emerging growth company

 

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by checkmark if the registrantRegistrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES Yes  NO  No 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, based on the closing price of the shares of Class A common stock on Thethe New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2017,28, 2019, the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $11,487,095,467.approximately $13.6 billion.

As of January 31, 2018,2020, the registrantRegistrant had 887,610,9641,164,739,858 shares of Class A common stock, 122,808,70824,303,857 shares of Class B common stock, and 216,615,870231,147,476 shares of Class C common stock outstanding.

 

 

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

 

 

Page

Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

 

1

Note Regarding User Metrics and Other Data

 

2

 

 

 

 

PART I

 

 

 

 

Item 1.

 

Business

 

43

Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors

 

98

Item 1B.

 

Unresolved Staff Comments

 

3637

Item 2.

 

Properties

 

3637

Item 3.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

37

Item 4.

 

Mine Safety Disclosures

 

37

 

 

 

 

 

PART II

 

 

 

 

Item 5.

 

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

3738

Item 6.

 

Selected Financial Data

 

39

Item 7.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

42

Item 7A.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

6258

Item 8.

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

6359

Item 9.

 

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

97100

Item 9A.

 

Controls and Procedures

 

97100

Item 9B.

 

Other Information

 

97100

 

 

 

 

 

PART III

 

 

 

 

Item 10.

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

98102

Item 11.

 

Executive Compensation

 

104108

Item 12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 

116128

Item 13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 

118131

Item 14.

 

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

 

119133

 

 

 

 

 

PART IV

 

 

 

 

Item 15.

 

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

 

120135

Item 16.

SignaturesForm 10-K Summary

137

 

 

Signatures

123

138

 

 

i


 

NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKINGFORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The following discussionThis Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, about us and our industry that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K,report, including statements regarding guidance, our future results of operations or financial condition, business strategy and plans, user growth and engagement, product initiatives, and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements because they contain words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “going to,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “target,” “will,” or “would” or the negative of these words or other similar terms or expressions.

We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy, and financial needs. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, including risks described in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K regarding, among other things:

our financial performance, including our revenues, cost of revenues, operating expenses, and our ability to attain and sustain profitability;

our ability to attract and retain users;

our ability to attract and retain advertisers;

our ability to compete effectively with existing competitors and new market entrants;

our ability to successfully expand in our existing markets and penetrate new markets;

our ability to effectively manage our growth and future expenses;

our ability to maintain, protect, and enhance our intellectual property;

our ability to comply with modified or new laws and regulations applying to our business;

our ability to attract and retain qualified employees and key personnel; and

future acquisitions of or investments in complementary companies, products, services, or technologies.

We caution you that the foregoing list may not containinclude all of the forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.report.

You should not rely on forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. We have based the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K primarily on our current expectations and projections about future events and trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. The outcome of the events described in theseThese forward-looking statements isare subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors described in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 10-K, including among other things:

our financial performance, including our revenues, cost of revenues, operating expenses, and our ability to attain and sustain profitability;

our ability to generate and sustain positive cash flow;

our ability to attract and retain users and publishers;

our ability to attract and retain advertisers;

our ability to compete effectively with existing competitors and new market entrants;

our ability to effectively manage our growth and future expenses;

our ability to comply with modified or new laws and regulations applying to our business;

our ability to maintain, protect, and enhance our intellectual property;

our ability to successfully expand in our existing market segments and penetrate new market segments;

our ability to attract and retain qualified employees and key personnel;

our ability to repay outstanding debt; and

future acquisitions of or investments in complementary companies, products, services, or technologies.

Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks and uncertainties emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all risks and uncertainties that could have an impact on the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results, events, and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements may not be achieved or occur, and actual results, events, or circumstances could differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements.

In addition, statements that “we believe” and similar statements reflect our beliefs and opinions on the relevant subject. These statements are based on information available to us as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. And while we believe that information provides a reasonable basis for these statements, that information may be limited or incomplete. Our statements should not be read to indicate that we have conducted an exhaustive inquiry into, or review of, all relevant information. These statements are inherently uncertain, and investors are cautioned not to unduly rely on these statements.


The forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kreport to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-Kreport or to reflect new information or the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law. We may not actually achieve the plans, intentions, or expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements, and you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any future acquisitions, mergers, dispositions, joint ventures, restructuring, legal settlements, or investments.

Investors and others should note that we may announce material business and financial information to our investors using our investor relations website (investor.snap.com), filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, filings, webcasts, press releases, and conference calls. We use these mediums, including Snapchat and our website, to communicate with our members and the public about our company, our products, and other issues. It is possible that the information that we make available may be deemed to be material information. We therefore encourage investors and others interested in our company to review the information that we make available on our website.


NOTE REGARDING USER METRICS AND OTHER DATA

We define a Daily Active User, or DAU, as a registered Snapchat user who opens the Snapchat application at least once during a defined 24-hour period. We measurecalculate average Daily Active Users for a particular quarter by calculatingadding the average Daily Active Users fornumber of DAUs on each day of that quarter and dividing that sum by the number of days in that quarter. We also breakDAUs are broken out Daily Active Users by geography because certain markets have a greater revenue opportunity and lower bandwidth costs.different characteristics. We define average revenue per user, or ARPU, as quarterly revenue divided by the average Daily Active Users. For purposes of calculating ARPU, revenue by user geography is apportioned to each region based on our determination of the geographic location in which advertising impressions are delivered, as this approximates revenue based on user activity. This allocation differs from our components of revenue by geography disclosure in the notes to our consolidated financial statements, where revenue is based on the billing address of the advertising customer. For information concerning these metrics as measured by us, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Unless otherwise stated, statistical information regarding our users and their activities is determined by calculating the daily average of the selected activity for the most recently completed quarter included in this report.

While these metrics are determined based on what we believe to be reasonable estimates of our user base for the applicable period of measurement, there are inherent challenges in measuring how our products are used across large populations globally. For example, there may be individuals who have unauthorized or multiple Snapchat accounts, even though we forbid that in our Terms of Service and implement measures to detect and suppress that behavior. We have not determined the number of such multiple accounts. Our user metrics are also affected by technology on certain mobile devices that automatically runs in the background of our Snapchat application when another phone function is used, and this activity can cause our system to miscount the user metrics associated with such account.

Changes in our products, infrastructure, mobile operating systems, or metric tracking system, or the introduction of new products, may impact our ability to accurately determine Daily Active Usersactive users or other metrics and we may not determine such inaccuracies promptly. We also believe that we don’t capture all data regarding alleach of our Daily Active Users. For example, technicalactive users. Technical issues may result in data not record databeing recorded from every user’s application. WhileFor example, because some Snapchat features can be used without internet connectivity, we believe this underreporting is generally immaterial,may not count a DAU because we are unable to precisely determinedon’t receive timely notice that a user has opened the levelSnapchat application. This undercounting may grow as we grow in Rest of underreporting and for some periods the underreportingWorld markets where users may be material. We continually seek to address these technical issues and improve our accuracy, but given the complexity of the systems involved and the rapidly changing nature of mobile devices and systems, we expect underreporting to continue.have poor connectivity. We do not adjust our reported metrics to reflect this underreporting. We believe that we have adequate controls to collect user metrics, however, there is no uniform industry standard. We continually seek to identify these technical issues and improve both our accuracy and precision, including ensuring that our investors and others can understand the factors impacting our business, but these and new issues may continue in the future, including if there continues to be no uniform industry standard.

Some of our demographic data may be incomplete or inaccurate. For example, because users self-report their dates of birth, our age-demographic data may differ from our users’ actual ages. And because users who signed up for Snapchat before June 2013 were not asked to supply their date of birth, we exclude those users and estimate their ages based on a sample of the self-reported ages we do have. If our Daily Active Usersactive users provide us with incorrect or incomplete information regarding their age or other attributes, then our estimates may prove inaccurate and fail to meet investor expectations.


In the past we have relied on third-party analytics providers to calculate our metrics, but today we rely primarily on our analytics platform that we developed and operate. For example, before June 2015, we used a third party that counted a Daily Active User when the application was opened or a notification was received via the application on any device. We now use an analytics platform that we developed and operate and we count a Daily Active User only when a user opens the application and only once per user per day. We believe this methodology more accurately measures our user engagement. We have multiple pipelines of user data that we use to determine whether a user has opened the application during a particular day, and thus is a Daily Active User. This provides redundancy in the event one pipeline of data were to become unavailable for technical reasons, and also gives us redundant data to help measure how users interact with our application.

Additionally, to align our pre-June 2015 Daily Active Users with this new methodology, we reduced our pre-June 2015 Daily Active Users by 4.8%, the amount by which we estimated the data generated by the third party was overstated. As a result, our metrics may not be comparable to prior periods.

If we fail to maintain an effective analytics platform, our metrics calculations may be inaccurate. We regularly review, have adjusted in the past, and are likely in the future to adjust our processes for calculating our internal metrics to improve their accuracy. As a result of such adjustments, our Daily Active Users or other metrics may not be comparable to those in prior periods. Our measures of Daily Active Users may differ from estimates published by third parties or from similarly titled metrics of our competitors due to differences in methodology or data used.


PARTPART I

Item 1. BusinessBusiness.

Overview

Snap Inc. is a camera company. We believe that reinventing the camera represents our greatest opportunity to improve the way that people live and communicate. Our products empowerWe contribute to human progress by empowering people to express themselves, live in the moment, learn about the world, and have fun together.

Our flagship product, Snapchat, is a camera application that helps people communicate visually with friends and family through short videos and images called Snaps. By opening directly to the camera, we empower users to express themselves instantly. Snaps are deleted by default, so there is a lot less pressure to look pretty or perfect when creating and sending images on Snapchat. By reducing the friction typically associated with creating and sharing content, Snapchat has already become one of the most-used cameras in the world. On average, 187 million people use Snapchat daily and create over 3.5 billion Snaps every day. According to InfoTrends, this is more than the total number of photographs taken on average across all phones, tablets, and digital cameras combined (excluding Snapchat) each day in 2017.

In the way that the flashing cursor became the starting point for most products on desktop computers, we believe that the camera screen will be the starting point for most products on smartphones. This is because images created by smartphone cameras contain more context and richer information than other forms of input like text entered on a keyboard. Given the magnitude of this opportunity, we invest heavily and take big risks in an attempt to create innovative and differentiated camera products that are better able to reflect and improve our life experiences.

Our Products

Camera: Snapchat opens directly intoto the Camera, making it easy to create a Snap and send it to friends. We offer a wide variety of creative tools, created by both us and our community, to make it easy for people to personalize and add context to their Snaps. Over one third of our Daily Active Users play with our augmented reality Lenses every day on average, and anyone can create their own Lens using our Lens Studio. Additionally, we also offer contextually relevant content and creative tools based on things like time, location, and objects.

Friends PageChat: The first version of our application was a chat service that made it easy to send Snaps back and forth with friends—hence the name “Snapchat.” Interacting with friends on Snapchat now includes creating and watching Stories, chatting with Groups, making voice and video calls, and communicating through a wide range of contextual stickers and Bitmojis. The content and ordering of the FriendsChat page reflects the user’s relationships with their friends and family. This close friend network drives high frequency engagement and results in our community opening our application an average of 25 times per day.

Discover: With so many Snaps created every day around the world, Discover helps surface the most interesting Stories and Shows from publishers, creators, and the community, based on a user’s subscriptions and interests. With so much content to explore, our users spend an average of more than 30 minutes every day in our application.

Snap Map: PinchingPulling down on the cameraCamera screen brings you to a live map of your location, showing nearby friends, popular stories, and a heatmap of recent Snaps posted to Our Story. It’s a great way to see what your friends are doing and explore what is going on around the world.

Memories: Users can choose to save the Snaps they create in a searchable personal collection called Memories. Memories also lets users create Snaps and Stories from their saved Snaps as well as their camera roll.

Spectacles: One of the best ways to create Memories is by using Spectacles, our sunglasses that make Snaps. Spectacles connect seamlessly with Snapchat and capture video from a human perspective.


Our Business

We generate revenue primarily through advertising.

Advertising Products: Products: Our ad products are built on the same foundation that makes our consumer products successful. This means that we can take the things we learn while creating our consumer products and apply them to building innovative and engaging advertising products familiar to our community. Sponsored Lenses take advantage of the reach and scale of our augmented reality platform to create visually engaging 3D experiences. Sponsored Geofilters help users create and send contextual Snaps with their friends, like showing that they are at a particular store or restaurant. Snap Ads and Promoted Stories let advertisers tell their stories the same way our users do, using full screen videos with sound. AttachmentsSnap Ads also allow advertisers to attachintegrate additional experiences and actions directly within these ad units, including watching a long-form video, visiting a website, or installing an app.

Campaign Management and Delivery:Delivery: We are always working to improve the way ads are bought and delivered. We are investing heavily in our programmatic and self-serviceself-serve tools, which provide for automated, sophisticated, and scalable ad buying and campaign management. This helps advertisers increase their return on investment by taking advantage ofproviding more refined targeting, capabilities, the ability to test and learn with different creatives or campaign attributes in real time, and the pricing dynamics of our auction.self-serve pricing. Additionally, our delivery framework continues to optimize relevance of ads across the entire platform by determining the best ad to show to any given user based on their real-time and historical attributes and activity. This decreases the number of wasted impressions while improving the effectiveness of the ads that are shown to our community.

Measuring Advertising Effectiveness:Effectiveness: We offer a broad range of third-party and first-party solutions to provide analytics on campaign attributes like reach, frequency, demographics, and viewability; changes in perceptions like brand favorability or purchase intent; and lifts in actual behavior like purchases, foot traffic, app installs, and online purchases. We are constantly expanding our capabilities in this areaability to provide more transparency to advertisers. For example, through our acquisition of Placed, Inc., a location-based measurement services company, we offer omni-channel measurement of store visitation, so that advertisers can measure the performance of their entire budget across all platforms and campaigns as it relates to the more than 90% of retail transactions that still happen offline in the physical world.

Our Strategy

Our strategy is to invest in product innovation and take risks to improve our camera platform. We do this in an effort to drive user engagement, which we can then monetize through advertising. We use the revenue we generate to fund future product innovation to grow our business.

We believe that the best way to compete in a world of widely distributed mobile applications is innovating to create the most engaging products. New mobile software is available to everyone immediately, and usually for free. While not all of our investments will pay off in the long run, we are willing to take risks in an attempt to create the best and most differentiated products on the market.

Due to the nature of our products and business, our ability to succeed in any given country is largely dependent on its mobile infrastructure and its advertising market. These factors influence our product performance, hosting costs, and monetization opportunity in each market.

Visual communication and augmented reality requiresrequire intensive processing and generatesgenerate high bandwidth consumption by our users. As a result, our existing users tend to come from developed countries with high-end mobile devices and high-speed cellular internet. These markets also tend to have cheaper bandwidth costs, meaning that it is less expensive to serve our community in these countries. As we continue to grow in more markets around the world, we are investing heavily in making our service and technology more performant on lower end devices and working with carriers and other infrastructure partners to provide our service at a lower cost to our community.

Substantially all of our revenue comes from advertising, so our ability to generate revenue in a particular countryregion depends on the size of its advertising market. Global advertising spend—especially mobile advertising spend—is extremely concentrated among top markets, and we see a high correlation between markets with significant and developed advertising markets and those that have a deep penetration of high-end mobile devices and high-speed cellular internet access. As such, we benefit greatly from the fact that many of our users are in markets where we have the highest capital efficiency and monetization potential, allowing us to generate revenue and cash flow that we can then invest into future product innovation.


Our Commitment to Privacy

Our approach to privacy is simple: Be upfront, offer choices, and never forget that our community comes first.

We built Snapchat as an antidote to the context-less communication that has plagued “social media.” Not so long ago, a conversation among friends would be just that: a private communication in which you knew exactly who you were talking to, what you were talking about, and whether what you were saying was being memorialized for eternity. Somewhere along the way, social media—by prioritizing virality and permanence—sapped conversations of this valuable context and choice. When we began to communicate online, we lost some of what made communication great: spontaneity, emotion, honesty—the full range of human expression that makes us human in the first place.

We don’t think digital communication has to be this way. That’s why choice matters. We build products and services that emphasize the context of a conversation—who, when, what, and where something is being said. If you don’t have the autonomy to shape the context of a conversation, the conversation will simply be shaped by the permanent feeds that homogenize online conversations.

When you read our Privacy Policy, we hope that you’ll notice how much we care about the integrity of personal communication. For starters, we’ve written our Privacy Policy in plain language because we think it’s important that everyone understand exactly how we handle their information. Otherwise, it’s hard to make informed choices about how you communicate. We’ve also created a robust Privacy Center where we show that context and choice are more than talking points. There, we point out the many ways that users can control who sees their Snaps and Stories, we explain how long content will remain on our servers, how users can manage the information that we do have about them, and much more. You’llThere, you’ll also find there our Transparency Report. We’re proud that we published our first Transparency Report just a few years into the company’s existence, long before most companies take that important step.

We also understand that privacy policies—no matter how ambitious—are only as good as the people and practices behind those policies. When someone trusts us to transmit or store their information, we know we have a responsibility to protect that information and we work hard to keep it secure. New features go through an intense privacy-review process—we debate pros and cons, and we work hard to build products we’re proud of and that we’ll want to use. We use Snapchat constantly, both at work and in our personal lives, and we handle user information with the same care that we want for our family, our friends, and ourselves.

Competition

We compete with other companies in every aspect of our business, particularly with companies that focus on mobile engagement and advertising. Many of these companies, such as Apple, Facebook (including Instagram and WhatsApp), Google (including YouTube), and Twitter, have significantly greater financial and human resources and, in some cases, larger user bases. Given the breadth of our product offerings, we also compete with companies that develop products or otherwise operate in the mobile, camera, communication, media,content, and advertising industries.industries that offer, or will offer, products and services that may compete with Snapchat features or offerings. Our competitors span from internet technology companies and digital platforms, including advertising-supported video on demand platforms (such as Quibi), to traditional companies in print, radio, and television sectors to underlying technologies like default smartphone cameras and messaging. Additionally, our competition for engagement varies by region. For instance, we face competition from companies like Kakao, LINE, Naver (including Snow), Bytedance (including TikTok), and Tencent in Asia.

We compete to attract and retain our users’ attention, both in terms of reach and engagement. Since our products and those of our competitors are typically free, we compete based on our brand and the quality and nature of our product offerings rather than on price. As such, we invest heavily in constantly improving and expanding our product lines.

We also compete with other companies to attract and retain partners and advertisers, which depends primarily on our reach and ability to deliver a strong return on investment.

Finally, we compete to attract and retain highly talented individuals, including software engineers, designers, and product managers. Our headquarters in Venice,Santa Monica, California and our other principal offices in the Los Angeles area offeroffers certain advantages, such as lower local recruiting competition from other companies and providing an enticing location to live, as well as certain disadvantages such as the increased need to recruit remotely and requiringthe need for employees to relocate to the Los Angeles area. In addition to providing competitive compensation packages, we compete for talent by fostering a culture of working hard to create great products and experiences and allowing our employees to have a direct meaningful contribution to new and exciting projects. We had 3,0693,195 employees as of December 31, 2017.2019.


Technology

Our research and development efforts focus on product development, advertising technology, and large-scale infrastructure.

Product Development: Development: We work relentlessly and invest heavily to create and improve products for our community and our partners. We develop a wide range of products related to visual communication and storytelling that are powered by a variety of new technologies.

Advertising Technology: Technology:We constantly develop and expand our advertising products and technology. In an effort to provide a strong and scalable return on investment to our advertisers, our advertising technology roadmap centers around improving our delivery framework, measurement capabilities, and our self-service buying and creativeself-serve tools.

Large-scale Infrastructure: Infrastructure:We spend considerable resources and investment on the underlying architecture that powers our products, such as optimizing the delivery of billions of videos to hundreds of millions of people around the world every day. We currently partner with providers like Google and Amazon to support the infrastructure for our growing needs. These partnerships have allowed us to scale quickly without upfront infrastructure costs, letting us focus our efforts on product innovation.

Our research and development expenses were $883.5 million, $772.2 million, and $1.5 billion $183.7 million,in 2019, 2018, and $82.2 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. For information about our research and development expenses, see “Management's“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Results of Operations—Research and Development Expenses” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Seasonality in Our Business

We have historically seen a high degree of seasonality in our business and financial results.business. Overall brand advertising spend tends to be strongest in the fourth quarter of the calendar year, and we have observed a similar pattern in our historical revenue. We have also experienced seasonality in our user engagement, generally seeing lower engagement during summer months. The rapid growthmonths and higher engagement in our business and user engagement has generally masked these trends to date, and we expect the impact of seasonality to be more pronounced in the future.December.

Key Customers

No individual customer represented more than 10% of our revenues in 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, or 2015.2017.

Intellectual Property

Our success depends in part on our ability to protect our intellectual property and proprietary technologies. To protect our proprietary rights, we rely on a combination of intellectual property rights in the United States and other jurisdictions, including patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secret laws, license agreements, internal procedures, and contractual provisions. We also enter into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with our employees and contractors and sign confidentiality agreements with third parties. Our internal controls restrict access to proprietary technology.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had 375approximately 600 issued patents and approximately 5141,100 filed patent applications in the United States and foreign countries relating to our camera platform and other technologies. Our issued patents will expire between 20182020 and 2036.2038. We may not be able to obtain protection for our intellectual property, and our existing and future patents, trademarks, and other intellectual property rights may not provide us with competitive advantages or distinguish our products and services from those of our competitors. Our patent applications may not result in the issuance of patents, and any resulting issued patents may have claims narrower than those in our patent applications. Additionally, our current and future patents, trademarks, and other intellectual property rights may be contested, circumvented, or found unenforceable or invalid, and we may not be able to prevent third parties from infringing them. Our internal controls and contractual provisions may not always be effective at preventing unauthorized parties from obtaining our intellectual property and proprietary technologies.


We license content, trademarks, technology, and other intellectual property from our partners, and rely on our license agreements with those partners to use the intellectual property. We also enter into licensing agreements with third parties to receive rights to patents and other know-how. Third parties may assert claims related to intellectual property rights against our partners or us.

Other companies and “non-practicing entities” that own patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, and other intellectual property rights related to the mobile, camera, communication, media,content, internet, and other technology-related industries frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement, misappropriation, and other violations of intellectual property or other rights. Third parties, including our competitors and non-practicing entities, have and may continue to make claims from time to time that we have infringed their patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, or other intellectual property rights. We are party to many agreements under which we are obligated to indemnify our customers, suppliers, and channel partners against such claims. As our business growscontinues to grow and competition increases, we will likely face more claims related to intellectual property and litigation matters. In addition, to the extent that we gain greater visibility and market exposure as a public company, we face a higher risk of being the subject of intellectual property infringement claims from third parties.

Government Regulation

We are subject to many U.S. federal and state and foreign laws and regulations, including those related to privacy, rights of publicity, data protection, content regulation, intellectual property, health and safety, competition, protection of minors, consumer protection, and taxation. These laws and regulations are constantly evolving and may be interpreted, applied, created, or amended in a manner that could harm our business.

In December 2014, the Federal Trade Commission resolved an investigation into some of our early practices by handing down a final order. That order requires, among other things, that we establish a robust privacy program to govern how we treat user data. During the 20-year lifespan of the order, we must complete bi-annualbiennial independent privacy audits. In June 2014, we entered into a 10-year assurance of discontinuance with the Attorney General of Maryland implementing similar practices, including measures to prevent minors from creating accounts and providing annual compliance reports. Violating existing or future regulatory orders or consent decrees could subject us to substantial monetary fines and other penalties that could negatively affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Furthermore, foreign data protection, privacy, consumer protection, content regulation, and other laws and regulations are often more restrictive than those in the United States. It is possible that certain governments may seek to block or limit our products or otherwise impose other restrictions that may affect the accessibility or usability of any or all our products for an extended period of time or indefinitely. For example, we have very limited access to the China market, as we have not yet established an operating presence in China to support Snapchat. Access to Google, which currently powers our infrastructure, is restricted in China. Additionally, notNot all of our products are available in all locations including Spectacles, and may not be due to such laws and regulations. We have a public policy team that monitors legal and regulatory developments in the United States, as well as many foreign countries, and communicates with policymakers and regulators in the United States and internationally.

Corporate Information

We were formed as Future Freshman, LLC, a California limited liability company, in 2010. We changed our name to Toyopa Group, LLC in 2011, incorporated as Snapchat, Inc., a Delaware corporation, in 2012, and changed our name to Snap Inc. in 2016. We completed our initial public offering in March 2017 and our Class A common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, under the symbol “SNAP.”

Our principal executive offices are located at 63 Market Street, Venice,2772 Donald Douglas Loop North, Santa Monica, California 90291,90405, and our telephone number is (310) 399-3339. Snap Inc., “Snapchat,” and our other registered and common-law trade names, trademarks, and service marks appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are property of Snap Inc. or our subsidiaries.

Information about Segment and Geographic Revenue

Information about segment and geographic revenue is set forth in Notes 1 and 102 of the notes to our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements included in “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Available Information

Our website address is www.snap.com. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports filed pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act are filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. Such reports and other information filed or furnished by us with the SEC are available free of charge on our website at investor.snap.com when such reports are available on the SEC’s website. We use our website, including investor.snap.com, as a means of disclosing material non-public information and for complying with our disclosure obligations under Regulation FD.

Any person may read and copy any materials filed by us with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, like us, that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that website is www.sec.gov.

Information contained in, or accessible through, of the websites referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K areis not incorporated into this filing. Further, our references to website addresses are only as inactive textual references.

Item 1A. Risk FactorsFactors.

You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and the related notes. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations, revenue, and future prospects could be seriously harmed. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we currently believe are not material, may also become important factors that adversely affect our business. Unless otherwise indicated, references to our business being seriously harmed in these risk factors will include harm to our business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations, revenue, and future prospects. In that event, the market price of our Class A common stock could decline, and you could lose part or all of your investment.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

Our ecosystem of users, advertisers, and partners depends on the engagement of our user base. We anticipate thathave seen the growth rate of our user base will decline over time.in the past and it may do so again in the future. If we fail to retain current users or add new users, or if our users engage less with Snapchat, our business would be seriously harmed.

We had 187 million and 158218 million Daily Active Users on average in the quartersquarter ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, and we2019. We view Daily Active UsersDAUs as a critical measure of our user engagement. Adding,engagement, and adding, maintaining, and engaging Daily Active UsersDAUs have been and will continue to be necessary. We anticipate that our Daily Active UsersOur DAUs and DAU growth rate willhave declined in the past and they may decline over time ifin the future due to various factors, including as the size of our active user base increases, oras we achieve higher market penetration rates.rates, as we face continued competition for our users and their time, or if there are performance issues with our application. For example, in 2018, we believe our DAUs declined primarily due to changes in the design of our application and continued performance issues with the Android version of our application. In addition, if and when we achieve maximum market penetration rates among younger users in developed markets who use smartphones with iOS operating systems, future growth in Daily Active UsersDAUs will need to come from older users, developing markets, or users with Android operating systems, which may not be possible or may be more difficult or time consuming for us to achieve. If our Daily Active Users growth rate slows, our financial performance will increasingly depend on our ability to elevate user engagement or increase our monetization of users. If current and potential users do not perceive our products to be fun, engaging, and useful,While we may experience periods when our DAUs increase due to products and services with short-term popularity, we may not always be able to attract new users, retain existing users, or maintain or increase the frequency and duration of their engagement.engagement if current or potential new users do not perceive our products to be fun, engaging, and useful. In addition, because our products typically require high bandwidth data capabilities, the majority of our users live in countries with high-end mobile device penetration and high bandwidth capacity cellular networks with large coverage areas. We therefore do not expect to experience rapid user growth or engagement in countries with low smartphone penetration even if such countries have well-established and high bandwidth capacity cellular networks. We may also not experience rapid user growth or engagement in countries where, even though smartphone penetration is high, due to the lack of sufficient cellular based data networks, consumers rely heavily on Wi-Fi and may not access our products regularly.regularly throughout the day. If our DAU growth rate slows or becomes stagnant, or we have a decline in DAUs, our financial performance will increasingly depend on our ability to elevate user activity or increase the monetization of our users.


Snapchat is free and easy to join, the barrier to entry for new entrants in our business is low, and the switching costs to another platform are also low. Moreover, the majority of our users are 18-34 years old. This demographic may be less brand loyal and more likely to follow trends, including viral trends, than other demographics. These factors may lead users to switch to another product, which would negatively affect our user retention, growth, and engagement. Snapchat also may not be able to penetrate other demographics in a meaningful manner. Falling user retention, growth, or engagement could make Snapchat less attractive to advertisers and partners, which may seriously harm our business. In addition, our Daily Active Users may notwe continue to grow.compete with other companies to attract and retain our users’ attention. We measure our Daily Active Userscalculate average DAUs for a particular quarter by calculatingadding the daily averagenumber of users acrossDAUs on each day of that quarter and dividing that sum by the entirenumber of days in that quarter. This calculation may mask any individual days or months within the quarter that are significantly higher or lower than the average. There are many factors that could negatively affect user retention, growth, and engagement, including if:

users increasingly engage with competing products instead of ours;

users engage more with competing products instead of ours;

our competitors have and may continue to mimic our products and therefore harm our user engagement and growth;

our competitors continue to mimic our products or improve on them, which could harm our user engagement and growth;

we fail to introduce new and exciting products and services or those we introduce are poorly received;

we fail to introduce new and exciting products and services or those we introduce or modify are poorly received;

our products fail to operate effectively on the iOS and Android mobile operating systems;

our products fail to operate effectively on the iOS and Android mobile operating systems;

we are unable to continue to develop products that work with a variety of mobile operating systems, networks, and smartphones;

we are unable to continue to develop products that work with a variety of mobile operating systems, networks, and smartphones;

we do not provide a compelling user experience because of the decisions we make regarding the type and frequency of advertisements that we display;

we do not provide a compelling user experience because of the decisions we make regarding the type and frequency of advertisements that we display or the structure and design of our products;

we are unable to combat spam or other hostile or inappropriate usage on our products;

we are unable to combat spam or other hostile or inappropriate usage on our products;

there are changes in user sentiment about the quality or usefulness of our existing products in the short term, long term, or both;

there are changes in user sentiment about the quality or usefulness of our existing products in the short term, long term, or both;

there are concerns about the privacy implications, safety, or security of our products;

there are concerns about the privacy implications, safety, or security of our products;

our partners who provide content to Snapchat do not create content that is engaging, useful, or relevant to users;

our partners who provide content to Snapchat do not create content that is engaging, useful, or relevant to users;

our partners who provide content to Snapchat decide not to renew agreements or devote the resources to create engaging content or do not provide content exclusively to us;

our partners who provide content to Snapchat decide not to renew agreements or devote the resources to create engaging content or do not provide content exclusively to us;

advertisers display ads that are untrue, offensive, or otherwise fail to follow our guidelines;

advertisers and partners display ads that are untrue, offensive, or otherwise fail to follow our guidelines;

there are changes in our products that are mandated by legislation, regulatory authorities, or litigation, including settlements or consent decrees that adversely affect the user experience;

there are changes in our products that are mandated or prompted by legislation, regulatory authorities, or litigation, including settlements or consent decrees, that adversely affect the user experience;

there are changes to our Terms of Service that are implemented in connection with the General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, in Europe, which may decrease engagement or acceptance by our users;

technical or other problems frustrate the user experience, particularly if those problems prevent us from delivering our product experience in a fast and reliable manner;

technical or other problems frustrate the user experience, particularly if those problems prevent us from delivering our products in a fast and reliable manner;

we fail to provide adequate service to users, advertisers, or partners;

we fail to provide adequate service to users, advertisers, or partners;

we do not provide a compelling user experience to entice users to use the Snapchat application on a daily basis;

we, our partners, or other companies in our industry are the subject of adverse media reports or other negative publicity, some of which may be inaccurate or include confidential information that we are unable to correct or retract;

we, our partners, or other companies in our industry segment are the subject of adverse media reports or other negative publicity, some of which may be inaccurate or include confidential information that we are unable to correct or retract;

we do not maintain our brand image or our reputation is damaged; or

we do not maintain our brand image or our reputation is damaged; or

our current or future products reduce user activity on Snapchat by making it easier for our users to interact directly with partners.

our current or future products reduce user activity on Snapchat by making it easier for our users to interact directly with our partners.

Any decrease to user retention, growth, or engagement could render our products less attractive to users, advertisers, or partners, and would seriously harm our business.


Snapchat depends on effectively operating with mobile operating systems, hardware, networks, regulations, and standards that we do not control. Changes in our products or to those operating systems, hardware, networks, regulations, or standards may seriously harm our user retention, growth, and engagement.

Because Snapchat is used primarily on mobile devices, the application must remain interoperable with popular mobile operating systems, Android and iOS, application stores, and related hardware, including but not limited to mobile-device cameras. The owners and operators of such operating systems and application stores, primarily Google and Apple, respectively, each have approval authority over our products and provide consumers with products that compete with ours. Additionally, mobile devices and mobile-device cameras are manufactured by a wide array of companies. Those companies have no obligation to test the interoperability of new mobile devices or mobile-device cameras with Snapchat, and may produce new products that are incompatible with or not optimal for Snapchat. We have no control over these operating systems, application stores, or hardware, and any changes to these systems or hardware that degrade our products’ functionality, or give preferential treatment to competitive products, could seriously harm Snapchat usage on mobile devices. Our competitors that control the operating systems and related hardware our application runs on could make interoperability of our products with those mobile operating systems more difficult or display their competitive offerings more prominently than ours. Additionally, our competitors that control the standards for the application stores for their operating systems could make Snapchat, or certain features of Snapchat, inaccessible for a potentially significant period of time. We plan to continue to introduce new products and features regularly and have experienced that it takes time to optimize such products and features to function with these operating systems, hardware, and hardware,standards, impacting the popularity of such products, and we expect this trend to continue.

The majority of our user engagement is on smartphones with iOS operating systems. As a result, although our products work with Android mobile devices, we historically prioritized development of our products to operate with iOS operating systems rather than smartphones with Android operating systems. To maintain and continue growth in user engagement, we have and will continue to prioritize improving our products’ operability on smartphones with Android operating systems. In 2018, we believe our DAUs declined partially due to performance issues with the Android version of our application. If we are unable to continue to improve the operability of our products on smartphones with Android operating systems and those smartphones become more popular and fewer people use smartphones with iOS operating systems,or if improvements to our products do not retain existing users or attract new users, our business could be seriously harmed.

Moreover, our products require high-bandwidth data capabilities. If the costs of data usage increase or access to cellular networks is limited, our user retention, growth, and engagement may be seriously harmed. Additionally, to deliver high-quality video and other content over mobile cellular networks, our products must work well with a range of mobile technologies, systems, networks, regulations, and standards that we do not control. In particular, any future changes to the iOS or Android operating systems or application stores may impact the accessibility, speed, functionality, and other performance aspects of our products whichand features, and result in issues are likely to occur in the future from time to time. In addition, the proposal or adoption of any laws, regulations, or regulationsinitiatives that adversely affect the growth, popularity, or use of the internet, including laws governing internet neutrality, could decrease the demand for our products and increase our cost of doing business.

For example, in December 2017,January 2018, the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, voted to repealreleased an order that repealed the “open internet rules,” which prohibit mobile providers in the United States from impeding access to most content, or otherwise unfairly discriminating against content providers like us and also prohibit mobile providers from entering into arrangements with specific content providers for faster or better access over their data networks. WhileThe FCC order repealing the FCC’sopen internet rules went into effect in June 2018. We cannot predict whether the FCC order or state initiatives regulating providers will be modified, overturned, or vacated by legal action, federal legislation, or the FCC, or the degree to which this repeal of these net neutrality regulations has not yet taken effect, the future impact of such repeal and any challenges to the repeal remains uncertain andwould adversely affect our business, could be seriously harmed. Theif at all. Similarly, the European Union similarly requires equal access to internet content. Additionally,content, but as part of its Digital Single Market initiative, the European Union may impose network security, disability access, or 911-like obligations on “over-the-top” services if we are considered to be such as those provided by us,a service, which could increase our costs. If the FCC’s repeal of the open internet rules is maintained, state initiatives are allowed to take effectmodified, overturned, or vacated, or the European Union modifies these open internet rules, mobile and internet providers may be able to limit our users’ ability to access Snapchat or make Snapchat a less attractive alternative to our competitors’ applications. Were that to happen, our ability to retain existing users or attract new users may be impaired, and our business would be seriously harmed.

We may not successfully cultivate relationships with key industry participants or develop products that operate effectively with these technologies, systems, networks, regulations, or standards. If it becomes more difficult for our users to access and use Snapchat on their mobile devices, if our users choose not to access or use Snapchat on their mobile devices, or if our users choose to use mobile products that do not offer access to Snapchat, our business and user retention, growth, and engagement could be seriously harmed.


We rely on Google Cloud and Amazon Web Services, or AWS, for the vast majority of our computing, storage, bandwidth, and other services. Any disruption of or interference with our use of the Google Cloud operationeither platform would negatively affect our operations and seriously harm our business.

Google provides aand Amazon provide distributed computing infrastructure platformplatforms for business operations, or what is commonly referred to as a “cloud” computing service, and weservice. We currently run the vast majority of our computing on Google Cloud.


Cloud and AWS, and our systems are not fully redundant on the two platforms. Any transition of the cloud services currently provided by either Google Cloud or AWS to the other platform or to another cloud provider would be difficult to implement and will cause us to incur significant time and expense. We have committed to spend $2.0 billion with Google Cloud over five years (beginningand $1.1 billion with AWS over six years, in each case beginning January 2017)2017, and have built our software and computer systems to use computing, storage capabilities, bandwidth, and other services provided by Google some of which do not have an alternative in the market.and AWS. Given this, any significant disruption of or interference with our use of Google Cloud or AWS would negatively impact our operations and our business would be seriously harmed. If our users or partners are not able to access Snapchat through Google Cloudor specific Snapchat features, or encounter difficulties in doing so, due to issues or disruptions with Google Cloud or AWS, we may lose users, partners, or advertising revenue. The level of service provided by Google Cloud and AWS or similar providers may also impact the usage of and our users’, advertisers’, and partners’ usage of and satisfaction with Snapchat and could seriously harm our business and reputation. If Google Cloud, AWS, or similar providers experience interruptions in service regularly or for a prolonged basis, or other similar issues, our business would be seriously harmed. Hosting costs also have and will continue to increase as our user base and user engagement grows and may seriously harm our business if we are unable to grow our revenues faster than the cost of utilizing the services of Google Cloud, AWS, or similar providers.

In addition, each of Google and Amazon may take actions beyond our control that could seriously harm our business, including:

discontinuing or limiting our access to its Google Cloud platform;

discontinuing or limiting our access to its cloud platform;

increasing pricing terms;

increasing pricing terms;

terminating or seeking to terminate our contractual relationship altogether;

terminating or seeking to terminate our contractual relationship altogether;

establishing more favorable relationships or pricing terms with one or more of our competitors; and

establishing more favorable relationships or pricing terms with one or more of our competitors; and

modifying or interpreting its terms of service or other policies in a manner that impacts our ability to run our business and operations.

modifying or interpreting its terms of service or other policies in a manner that impacts our ability to run our business and operations.

Google and Amazon each has broad discretion to change and interpret its terms of service and other policies with respect to us, and those actions may be unfavorable to us. GoogleThey may also alter how we are able to process data on thetheir cloud platforms. If Google Cloud platform. If Googleor Amazon makes changes or interpretations that are unfavorable to us, our business wouldcould be seriously harmed.

We generate substantially all of our revenue from advertising. The failure to attract new advertisers, the loss of advertisers, or a reduction in how much they spend could seriously harm our business.

Substantially all of our revenue is generated from third parties advertising on Snapchat, a trend that we expect to continue. For the years ended December 31, 20172019, 2018, and 2016,2017, advertising revenue accounted for 97%98%, 99%, and 96%97% of total revenue, respectively. Although we have and continue to try to establish longer-term advertising commitments with advertisers, most advertisers do not have long-term advertising commitments with us, and our efforts to establish long-term commitments may not succeed.

While no individual customer accounts for more than 10%We are still early in developing our advertising business. Our advertising customers vary from small businesses to well-known brands. Many of our revenue, many of our advertiserscustomers only recently started working with us and spend a relatively small portion of their overall advertising budget with us.us, but some customers have devoted meaningful budgets that contribute to our total revenue. Still, no individual customer accounts for more than 10% of our annual revenue. In addition, advertisers may view some of our products as experimental and unproven. Advertisers will not continue to do business with us if we do not deliver advertisements in an effective manner, or if they do not believe that their investment in advertising with us will generate a competitive return relative to other alternatives. As our business continues to develop, including globally, there may be new or existing advertisers or resellers, or advertisers or resellers from different geographic regions that contribute more significantly to our total revenue. For example, greater China represented more than 10% of our revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2019. Any economic or political instability in a specific country or region may negatively impact our customers and their budgets with us, and our business would be seriously harmed.


Moreover, we rely heavily on our ability to collect and disclose data and metrics to and for our advertisers to attract new advertisers and retain existing advertisers. Any restriction, whether by law, regulation, policy, or other reason, on our ability to collect and disclose data and metrics which our advertisers find useful would impede our ability to attract and retain advertisers. For example, the General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, in the European Union, which went into effect in May 2018, expanded the rights of individuals to control how their personal data is collected and processed, and placed restrictions on the use of personal data of younger minors. In addition, the California Consumer Privacy Act, or CCPA, went into effect in January 2020 and places additional requirements on the handling of personal data for us, our partners, and our advertisers. The CCPA also provides for civil penalties for violations, as well as a private right of action for data breaches, which may increase the likelihood and cost of data breach litigation. The potential effects of this legislation are far-reaching and may require us to modify our data processing practices and policies and incur substantial costs and expenses in an effort to comply. Other state and federal legislative and regulatory bodies are considering similar legislation on how to handle personal data. Such restrictions could have an adverse effect on our ability to target and measure ads, and could reduce the demand or the pricing for our advertising products. Such adverse effects could be particularly material to us because we are still early in building our advertising business. Our advertising revenue could be seriously harmed by many other factors, including:

a decrease in the number of Daily Active Users on Snapchat;

a decrease in the amount of time spent on Snapchat or decreases in usage of our Creative Tools, Chat Service, or Storytelling Platform;

our inability to create new products that sustain or increase the value of our advertisements;

changes in our user demographics that make us less attractive to advertisers;

lack of ad creative availability by our advertising partners;

our partners who provide content to us may not renew agreements or devote the resources to create engaging content or do not provide content exclusively to us;


a diminished or stagnant growth in the number of DAUs on Snapchat;

 

a decrease in the amount of time spent on Snapchat, a decrease in the amount of content that our users share, or decreases in usage of our Creative Tools, Chat Service, or Storytelling Platform;

our inability to create new products that sustain or increase the value of our advertisements;

changes in our user demographics that make us less attractive to advertisers;

lack of ad creative availability by our advertising partners;

our partners who provide content to us may not renew agreements or devote the resources to create engaging content or do not provide content exclusively to us;

decreases in the perceived quantity, quality, usefulness, or relevance of the content provided by our users or partners;

changes in our analytics and measurement solutions that demonstrate the value of our advertisements and other commercial content;

changes in our analytics and measurement solutions that demonstrate the value of our advertisements and other commercial content;

competitive developments or advertiser perception of the value of our products that change the rates we can charge for advertising or the volume of advertising on Snapchat;

competitive developments or advertiser perception of the value of our products that change the rates we can charge for advertising or the volume of advertising on Snapchat;

product changes or advertising inventory management decisions we may make that change the type, size, or frequency of advertisements displayed on Snapchat or the method used by advertisers to purchase advertisements;

product changes or advertising inventory management decisions we may make that change the type, size, or frequency of advertisements displayed on Snapchat or the method used by advertisers to purchase advertisements;

adverse legal developments relating to advertising, including changes mandated by legislation, regulation, or litigation;

adverse legal developments relating to advertising, including changes mandated or prompted by legislation, regulation, or litigation;

adverse media reports or other negative publicity involving us, our founders, our partners, or other companies in our industry;

adverse media reports or other negative publicity involving us, our founders, our partners, or other companies in our industry segment;

advertiser or user perception that content published by us, our users, or our partners is objectionable;

advertiser or user perception that content published by us, our users, or our partners is objectionable;

the degree to which users skip advertisements and therefore diminish the value of those advertisements to advertisers;

the degree to which users skip advertisements and therefore diminish the value of those advertisements to advertisers;

changes in the way advertising is priced or its effectiveness is measured;

changes in the way advertising is priced or its effectiveness is measured;

our inability to measure the effectiveness of our advertising or target the appropriate audience for advertisements;

our inability to measure the effectiveness of our advertising or target the appropriate audience for advertisements;

our inability to collect and disclose data that new and existing advertisers may find useful;

our inability to collect and disclose data that new and existing advertisers may find useful;

difficulty and frustration from advertisers who may need to reformat or change their advertisements to comply with our guidelines; and

difficulty and frustration from advertisers who may need to reformat or change their advertisements to comply with our guidelines; and

the macroeconomic climate and the status of the advertising industry in general.

the macroeconomic climate and the status of the advertising industry in general.

These and other factors could reduce demand for our advertising products, which may lower the prices we receive, or cause advertisers to stop advertising with us altogether. Either of these would seriously harm our business.


Our two co-founders have control over all stockholder decisions because they control a substantial majority of our voting stock.

As a result of the Class C common stock that they hold,Our two co-founders, Evan Spiegel our co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, and Robert Murphy, our co-founder and Chief Technology Officer, are able to exerciseown or control voting rights with respect to an aggregate of 216,615,870 shares of Class C commonour capital stock which representsthat represent approximately 94.6%99% of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock as of December 31, 2017.2019. Mr. Spiegel alone can exercise voting control over a majority of our voting power. In addition,2016, Mr. Spiegel was granted an RSURSUs for 37,447,817 shares of Class C common stock that vested on the closing of our initial public offering, or IPO. This RSU award vested immediately on the closing of our IPO, in March 2017 andwith such shares are delivered to our CEOMr. Spiegel in quarterly installments over three years beginning in November 2017, following which Mr. Spiegel alone may be able to exercise voting control over our outstanding capital stock. The Class A common stock has no voting rights, the Class B common stock is entitled to one vote per share, and the2017. Shares of Class C common stock isare entitled to ten10 votes per share.share, so as additional quarterly installments of these Class C shares are delivered to Mr. Spiegel his voting power will increase, as will the collective voting power held by our co-founders. As a result, Mr. Spiegel and Mr. Murphy, and potentially either one of themor in many instances Mr. Spiegel acting alone, have the ability to control the outcome of all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election, removal, and replacement of our directors and any merger, consolidation, or sale of all or substantially all of our assets.

If Mr. Spiegel’s or Mr. Murphy’s employment with us is terminated, they will continue to have the ability to exercise the same significant voting power and potentially control the outcome of all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval. Either of our co-founders’ shares of Class C common stock will automatically convert into Class B common stock, on a one-to-one basis, nine months following his death or on the date on which the number of outstanding shares of Class C common stock held by such holder represents less than 30% of the Class C common stock held by such holder on the closing of our IPO, or 32,383,178 shares of Class C common stock. Should either of our co-founders’ Class C common stock be converted to Class B common stock, the remaining co-founder will be able to exercise voting control over our outstanding capital stock. Moreover, Mr. Spiegel and Mr. Murphy have entered into a proxy agreement under which each has granted to the other a voting proxy with respect to all shares of our Class B common stock and Class C common stock that each may beneficially own from time to time or have voting control over. The proxy would become effective on either founder’s death or disability. Accordingly, on the death or incapacity of either Mr. Spiegel or Mr. Murphy, the other could individually control nearly all of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock.


In addition, in October 2016, we issued a dividend of one share of non-voting Class A common stock to all our equity holders, which will prolong our co-founders’ voting control. As a result of such dividend,control because our co-founders will be able to liquidate their holdings of non-voting Class A common stock without diminishing their voting control. In the future, our board of directors may, from time to time, decide to issue special or regular stock dividends in the form of Class A common stock, and if we do so our co-founders’ control could be further prolonged. This concentrated control could delay, defer, or prevent a change of control, merger, consolidation, or sale of all or substantially all of our assets that our other stockholders support. Conversely, this concentrated control could allow our co-founders to consummate such a transaction that our other stockholders do not support. In addition, our co-founders may make long-term strategic investment decisions and take risks that may not be successful and may seriously harm our business.

As our CEO,Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Spiegel has control over our day-to-day management and the implementation of major strategic investments of our company, subject to authorization and oversight by our board of directors. As board members and officers, Mr. Spiegel and Mr. Murphy owe a fiduciary duty to our stockholders and must act in good faith in a manner they reasonably believe to be in the best interests of our stockholders. As stockholders, even controlling stockholders, Mr. Spiegel and Mr. Murphy are entitled to vote their shares, and shares over which they have voting control, in their own interests, which may not always be in the interests of our stockholders generally. We have not elected to take advantage of the “controlled company” exemption to the corporate governance rules for companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, listed companies. Moreover, Mr. Spiegel and Mr. Murphy have entered into a proxy agreement under which each has granted a voting proxy with respect to all shares of our Class B common stock and Class C common stock that each may beneficially own from time to time or have voting control over. The proxy would become effective on either founder’s death or disability. Mr. Spiegel and Mr. Murphy have each initially designated the other as their respective proxies. Accordingly, on the death or incapacity of either Mr. Spiegel or Mr. Murphy, the other could individually control nearly all of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock.NYSE.

If we do not develop successful new products or improve existing ones, our business will suffer. We may also invest in new lines of business that could fail to attract or retain users or generate revenue.

Our ability to engage, retain, and increase our user base and to increase our revenue will depend heavily on our ability to successfully create new products, both independently and together with third parties. We may introduce significant changes to our existing products or develop and introduce new and unproven products and services, including technologies with which we have little or no prior development or operating experience. These new products and updates may fail to increase the engagement of our users, advertisers, or partners, and may even result in short-term or long-term decreases in such engagement by disrupting existing user, advertiser, or partner behavior or by introducing performance and quality issues. For example, beginning in 2017, we transitioned most ofstarted transitioning our Snap Adsadvertising sales to a programmatic model,self-serve platform, which decreased average advertising prices. Additionally,In 2018, we introduced a major redesign of the Snapchat application in December 2017 that rolled out more broadly in February 2018, which has received negative attentionbelieve our DAUs declined primarily due to changes in the pressdesign of our application and in app store reviews.continued performance issues with the Android version of our application. In addition, we continue to compete with other companies to attract and retain our users’ attention. The short- and long-term impact of any major change,


like our recentearly 2018 application redesign and the rewrite of our application for Android users in 2019, or even a less significant change such as a refresh of the application or a feature change, is particularly difficult to predict. IfAlthough we believe that these decisions will benefit the aggregate user experience and improve our financial performance over the long term, we may experience disruptions or declines in our DAUs or user activity. Product innovation is inherently volatile, and if new or enhanced products fail to engage our users, advertisers, or partners, or if we fail to give our users meaningful reasons to return to our application, we may fail to attract or retain users or to generate sufficient revenue, operating margin, or other value to justify our investments, any of which may seriously harm our business in the short term, long term, or both. Additionally, we frequently launch new products and the products that we launch may have technical issues that diminish the performance of our application. These performance issues or issues that we encounter in the future could impact our user engagement.

Because our products created new ways of communicating, they have often required users to learn new behaviors to use our products, or to use our products repeatedly to receive the most benefit. These new behaviors, such as swiping and tapping in the Snapchat application, are not always intuitive to users. This can create a lag in adoption of new products and new user additions related to new products. To date, this has not hindered our user growth or engagement, but that may be the result of a large portion of our user base being in a younger demographic and more willing to invest the time to learn to use our products most effectively. To the extent that future users, including those in older demographics, are less willing to invest the time to learn to use our products, and if we are unable to make our products easier to learn to use, our user growth or engagement could be affected, and our business could be harmed. We may develop new products that increase user engagement and costs without increasing revenue. For example, in 2016, we introduced Memories, in 2016, our cloud storage service for Snaps, which increases our storage costs.costs but does not currently generate revenue.

In addition, we have invested and expect to continue to invest in new lines of business, new products, and other initiatives to generate revenue. The launch of Spectaclesrevenue and increase our user base and user activity. For example, in late 2016, which has not and may not generate significant revenue for us, is2019 we launched Snap Games, a good example. We do not have significantlive, multi-player gaming experience, with hardware products, and we have incurred Spectacles inventory-related charges and may incur increased costs in connection with the development, sale, and marketing of hardware


products.on Snapchat. There is no guarantee that investing insuch new lines of business, new products, and other initiatives will succeed.succeed or provide positive returns on our investment. If we do not successfully develop new approaches to monetization or meet the expectations of our users or partners, we may not be able to maintain or grow our revenue as anticipated or recover any associated development costs, and our business could be seriously harmed.

Our business is highly competitive. We face significant competition that we anticipate will continue to intensify. If we are not able to maintain or improve our market share, our business could suffer.

We face significant competition in almost every aspect of our business both domestically and internationally. This includesranges from smaller or newer companies to larger more established companies such as Apple, Facebook (including Instagram and WhatsApp), Google (including YouTube), Twitter, Kakao, LINE, Naver (including Snow), Bytedance (including TikTok), and Tencent, which provide their users with a variety of products, services, content, and online advertising offerings, and smaller companiesadvertising-supported video on demand platforms (such as Quibi) that offer, or will offer, products and services that may compete with specific Snapchat features.features or offerings. For example, Instagram, a subsidiarycompeting application owned by Facebook, has incorporated many of Facebook, introducedour features, including a “stories” feature that largely mimics our Stories feature and may be directly competitive. Facebook has introduced, and likely will continue to introduce, more private ephemeral products into its various platforms which mimic other aspects of Snapchat’s core use case. We may also lose users to small companies that offer products and services that compete with specific Snapchat features because of the low cost for our users to switch to a different product or service. Moreover, in emerging international markets, where mobile devices often lack large storage capabilities, we may compete with other applications for the limited space available on a user’s mobile device. We also face competition from traditional and online media businesses for advertising budgets. We compete broadly with the social media offerings of Apple, Bytedance, Facebook, Google, Pinterest, and Twitter, and with other, largely regional, social media platforms that have strong positions in particular countries. As we introduce new products, as our existing products evolve, or as other companies introduce new products and services, we may become subject to additional competition. For example, in late 2016, we launched Spectacles, our first hardware product. While we view Spectacles as an extension of Snapchat, adding hardware products and services to our product portfolio subjects us to additional competition and new competitors.


Many of our current and potential competitors have significantly greater resources and broader global recognition and occupy stronger competitive positions in certain marketsmarket segments than we do. These factors may allow our competitors to respond to new or emerging technologies and changes in market requirements better than we can. Our competitors may also develop products, features, or services that are similar to ours or that achieve greater market acceptance. These products, features, and services maycan, undertake more far-reaching and successful product development efforts or marketing campaigns, or may adopt more aggressive pricing policies. In addition, advertisers may use information that our users share through Snapchat to develop or work with competitors to develop products or features that compete with us. Certain competitors, including Apple, Facebook, and Google, could use strong or dominant positions in one or more marketsmarket segments to gain competitive advantages against us in areas where we operate, including by:

integrating competing social media platforms or features into products they control such as search engines, web browsers, or mobile device operating systems;

integrating competing social media platforms or features into products they control such as search engines, web browsers, advertising networks, or mobile device operating systems;

making acquisitions for similar or complementary products or services; or

making acquisitions for similar or complementary products or services; or

impeding Snapchat’s accessibility and usability by modifying existing hardware and software on which the Snapchat application operates.

impeding Snapchat’s accessibility and usability by modifying existing hardware and software on which the Snapchat application operates.

As a result, our competitors may acquire and engage users at the expense of our user growth or engagement, which may seriously harm our business.

We believe that our ability to compete effectively depends on many factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:

the usefulness, novelty, performance, and reliability of our products compared to our competitors;

the number and demographics of our Daily Active Users;

the timing and market acceptance of our products, including developments and enhancements of our competitors’ products;

our ability to monetize our products;

the effectiveness of our advertising and sales teams;

the effectiveness of our advertising products;

our ability to establish and maintain advertisers’ and partners’ interest in using Snapchat;


the usefulness, novelty, performance, and reliability of our products compared to our competitors;

 

the number and demographics of our DAUs;

the timing and market acceptance of our products, including developments and enhancements of our competitors’ products;

our ability to monetize our products;

the availability of our products to users;

the effectiveness of our advertising and sales teams;

the effectiveness of our advertising products;

our ability to establish and maintain advertisers’ and partners’ interest in using Snapchat;

the frequency, relative prominence, and type of advertisements displayed on our application or by our competitors;

the effectiveness of our customer service and support efforts;

the effectiveness of our customer service and support efforts;

the effectiveness of our marketing activities;

the effectiveness of our marketing activities;

changes as a result of legislation, regulatory authorities, or litigation, including settlements and consent decrees, some of which may have a disproportionate effect on us;

changes as a result of actual or proposed legislation, regulatory authorities, or litigation, including settlements and consent decrees, some of which may have a disproportionate effect on us;

acquisitions or consolidation within our industry;

acquisitions or consolidation within our industry segment;

our ability to attract, retain, and motivate talented employees, particularly engineers and sales personnel;

our ability to attract, retain, and motivate talented employees, particularly engineers, designers, and sales personnel;

our ability to successfully acquire and integrate companies and assets;

our ability to successfully acquire and integrate companies and assets;

our ability to cost-effectively manage and scale our rapidly growing operations; and

our ability to cost-effectively manage and scale our rapidly growing operations; and

our reputation and brand strength relative to our competitors.

our reputation and brand strength relative to our competitors.

If we cannot effectively compete, our user engagement may decrease, which could make us less attractive to users, advertisers, and partners and seriously harm our business.


We have incurred operating losses in the past, expect to incur operating losses in the future, and may never achieve or maintain profitability.

We began commercial operations in 2011 and for all of our history we have experienced net losses and negative cash flows from operations. As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had an accumulated deficit of $4.7$6.9 billion and for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, we experienced a net loss of $3.4$1.0 billion. We expect our operating expenses to increase in the future as we expand our operations. If our revenue does not grow at a greater rate than our expenses, we will not be able to achieve and maintain profitability. We may incur significant losses in the future for many reasons, including without limitationdue to the other risks and uncertainties described in this report. Additionally, we may encounter unforeseen expenses, operating delays, or other unknown factors that may result in losses in future periods. If our expenses exceed our revenue, our business may be seriously harmed and we may never achieve or maintain profitability.

The loss of one or more of our key personnel, or our failure to attract and retain other highly qualified personnel in the future, could seriously harm our business.

We depend on the continued services and performance of our key personnel, including Evan Spiegel and Robert Murphy. Although we have entered into employment agreements with Mr. Spiegel and Mr. Murphy, the agreements are at-will, which means that they may resign or could be terminated for any reason at any time. Mr. Spiegel and Mr. Murphy are high profile individuals who have received threats in the past and are likely to continue to receive threats in the future. While Mr. Spiegel, as CEO,Chief Executive Officer, has been responsible for our company’s strategic vision and Mr. Murphy, as CTO,Chief Technology Officer, developed the Snapchat application’s technical foundation, shouldfoundation. Should either of them stop working for us for any reason, it is unlikely that the other co-founder would be able to fulfill all of the responsibilities of the departing co-founder. Norco-founder nor is it likely that we would be able to immediately find a suitable replacement. The loss of key personnel, including members of management and key engineering, product development, marketing, and sales personnel, could disrupt our operations, adversely impact employee retention and morale, and seriously harm our business.

As we continue to grow, we cannot guarantee we will continue to attract and retain the personnel we need to maintain our competitive position. In particular, because we intend to hire a significant number of engineering and sales personnelare headquartered in the Los Angeles, area, and we expect to face significant competition in hiring them and difficulties in attracting qualified engineers, designers, and sales personnel to move to the Los Angeles area.

As we mature, the incentivesor if our stock price declines, our equity awards may not be as effective an incentive to attract, retain, and motivate employees provided byemployees. Additionally, many of our equity awards or by future arrangements, such as through cash bonuses, may not be as effective as in the past. Additionally, we have many current employees whose equity ownership in our company gives them a substantial amount of personal wealth. Likewise, we have many current employees with fully vested equity awards who received substantial amounts of our capital stock on or after our IPO. Now that the lock-up period has expired, attritionIPO, giving them a substantial amount of personal wealth, which can lead to an increase in attrition. As a result, it may increase.be difficult for us to continue to retain and motivate these employees, and this wealth could affect their decision about whether they continue to work for us. Additionally, if we issue significant equity to attract and retain employees, we would incur substantial additional stock-based compensation expense and the ownership of our existing stockholders would be further diluted. As a result, it may be difficult for us to continue to retain and motivate these


employees, and this wealth could affect their decision about whether they continue to work for us. If we do not succeed in attracting, hiring, and integrating excellent personnel, or retaining and motivating existing personnel, we may be unable to grow effectively and our business could be seriously harmed.

We have a short operating history and a newcontinually evolving business model, which makes it difficult to evaluate our prospects and future financial results and increases the risk that we will not be successful.

We began commercial operations in 2011 and began meaningfully monetizing Snapchat in 2015. We started transitioning our advertising sales to a self-serve platform in 2017. We have a short operating history and a newcontinually evolving business model, based on reinventing the camera to improve the way that people live and communicate, which makes it difficult to effectively assess our future prospects. Accordingly, we believe that investors’ future perceptions and expectations, which can be idiosyncratic and vary widely, and which we do not control, will affect our stock price. Our business model is based on reinventing the camera to improve the way that people live and communicate. You should consider our business and prospects in light of the challenges we face, including the ones discussed in this section.

If our security is compromised or if our platform is subjected to attacks that frustrate or thwart our users’ ability to access our products and services, our users, advertisers, and partners may cut back on or stop using our products and services altogether, which could seriously harm our business.

Our efforts to protect the information that our users have shared with us may be unsuccessful due to the actions of third parties, software bugs or other technical malfunctions, employee error or malfeasance, or other factors. In addition, third parties may attempt to fraudulently induce employees or users to disclose information to gain access to our data or our users’ data. If any of these events occur, our or our users’ information could be accessed or disclosed improperly. We have previously suffered the loss of employee information related to an employee error. Our Privacy Policy governs how we may use and share the information that our users have provided us. Some advertisers and partners may store information that we share with them. If these third parties fail to implement adequate data-security practices or fail to comply with our terms and policies, our users’ data may be improperly accessed or disclosed. And even if these third parties take all these steps, their networks may still suffer a breach, which could compromise our users’ data.


Any incidents where our users’ information is accessed without authorization, or is improperly used, or incidents that violate our Terms of Service or policies, could damage our reputation and our brand and diminish our competitive position. In addition, affected users or government authorities could initiate legal or regulatory action against us over those incidents, which could be time-consuming and cause us to incur significant expense and liability or result in orders or consent decrees forcing us to modify our business practices. Maintaining the trust of our users is important to sustain our growth, retention, and user engagement. Concerns over our privacy practices, whether actual or unfounded, could damage our reputation and brand and deter users, advertisers, and partners from using our products and services. Any of these occurrences could seriously harm our business.

We are also subject to many federal, state, and foreign laws and regulations, including those related to privacy, rights of publicity, content, data protection, content regulation, intellectual property, health and safety, competition, protection of minors, consumer protection, employment, and taxation. These laws and regulations are constantly evolving and may be interpreted, applied, created, or amended in a manner that could seriously harm our business.

In addition, in December 2014, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, or the FTC, resolved an investigation into some of our early practices by issuing a final order. That order requires, among other things, that we establish a robust privacy program to govern how we treat user data. During the 20-year term of the order, we must complete bi-annualbiennial independent privacy audits. In addition, in June 2014, we entered into a 10-year assurance of discontinuance with the Attorney General of Maryland implementing similar practices, including measures to prevent minors under the age of 13 from creating accounts and providing annual compliance reports. Violating existing or future regulatory orders or consent decrees could subject us to substantial monetary fines and other penalties that could seriously harm our business.

Our user metrics and other estimates are subject to inherent challenges in measurement, and real or perceived inaccuracies in those metrics may seriously harm and negatively affect our reputation and our business.

We regularly review metrics, including our Daily Active UsersDAUs and ARPU metrics, to evaluate growth trends, measure our performance, and make strategic decisions. These metrics are calculated using internal company data gathered on an analytics platform that we developed and operate and have not been validated by an independent third party. While these numbersmetrics are based on what we believe to be reasonable estimates of our user base for the applicable period of measurement, there are inherent challenges in measuring how our products are used across large populations globally. For example, we believe that there aremay be individuals who have multiple Snapchat accounts, even though we forbid that in our Terms of Service and implement measures to detect and suppress that behavior. Our user metrics are also affected by technology on certain mobile devices that automatically runs in the background of our Snapchat application when another phone function is used, and this activity can cause our system to miscount the user metrics associated with such account.


Some of our demographic data may be incomplete or inaccurate. For example, because users self-report their dates of birth, our age-demographic data may differ from our users’ actual ages. And because users who signed up for Snapchat before June 2013 were not asked to supply their date of birth, we exclude those users and estimate their ages based on a sample of the self-reported ages we do have. If our Daily Active Usersusers provide us with incorrect or incomplete information regarding their age or other attributes, then our estimates may prove inaccurate and fail to meet investor or advertiser expectations.

In the past we have relied on third-party analytics providers to calculateErrors or inaccuracies in our metrics but todayor data could also result in incorrect business decisions and inefficiencies. For instance, if a significant understatement or overstatement of active users were to occur, we rely primarily onmay expend resources to implement unnecessary business measures or fail to take required actions to attract a sufficient number of users to satisfy our analytics platform that we developed and operate. For example, before June 2015, we used a third party that counted a Daily Active User when the application was opened or a notification was received via the application on any device.growth strategies. We now use an analytics platform that we developed and operate and we count a Daily Active User onlyDAU when a user opens the application and only once per user per day. We believe this methodology more accurately measures our user engagement. We have multiple pipelines of user data that we use to determine whether a user has opened the application during a particular day, and thus is a Daily Active User.DAU. This provides redundancy in the event one pipeline of data were to become unavailable for technical reasons, and also gives us redundant data to help measure how users interact with our application.

Additionally, to align our pre-June 2015 Daily Active Users with this new methodology, However, we reduced our pre-June 2015 Daily Active Users by 4.8%, the amount by which we estimated the data generated by the third party was overstated. Since this adjustment is an estimate, the actual pre-June 2015 Daily Active Users may be higher or lower than our reported numbers. As a result, our metrics may not be comparable to prior periods.

Errors or inaccuracies in our metrics or data could result in incorrect business decisions and inefficiencies. For instance, if a significant understatement or overstatement of Daily Active Users were to occur, we may expend resources to implement unnecessary business measures or fail to take required actions to attract a sufficient number of users to satisfy our growth strategies. We believe that we do not capture all data regarding our Daily Active Users.active users, which may result in understated metrics. This generally occurs because of technical issues, like when our systems do not record data from everya user’s Snapchat application. We also seek to identify missed activityapplication or when data is lost or not captured, which may result in understated metrics. For example, a user may openopens the Snapchat application and contactcontacts our servers but is not be recorded as a Daily Active User.an active user. We are continually seekingseek to address these technical issues and improve our accuracy, such as comparing our Daily Active Usersactive users and other metrics with data received from other pipelines, including data recorded by our servers and systems. But given the complexity of the systems involved and the rapidly changing nature of mobile devices and systems, we expect these issues to continue.continue, particularly if we continue to expand in parts of the world where mobile data systems and connections are less stable. If advertisers, partners, or investors do not perceive our user, geographic, or other demographic metrics to be accurate representations of our user base, or if we discover material inaccuracies in our user, geographic, or other demographic metrics, our reputation may be seriously harmed. And at the same time,Our advertisers and partners may also be less willing to allocate their budgets or resources to Snapchat, which could seriously harm our business. In addition, we measure our Daily Active Userscalculate average DAUs for a particular quarter by calculatingadding the daily averagenumber of users acrossDAUs on each day of that quarter and dividing that sum by the number of days in that quarter. This calculation may mask any individual days or months within the quarter that are significantly higher or lower than the quarterly average.


Mobile malware, viruses, hacking and phishing attacks, spamming, and improper or illegal use of Snapchat could seriously harm our business and reputation.

Mobile malware, viruses, hacking, and phishing attacks have become more prevalent and sophisticated in our industry, have occurred on our systems in the past, and may occur on our systems in the future. Because of our prominence, we believe that we are an attractive target for these sorts of attacks. Although it is difficult to determine what, if any, harm may directly result from an interruption or attack, any failure to detect such attack and maintain performance, reliability, security, and availability of our products and technical infrastructure to the satisfaction of our users may seriously harm our reputation and our ability to retain existing users and attract new users.

In addition, spammers attempt to use our products to send targeted and untargeted spam messages to users, which may embarrass or annoy users and make our products less user friendly. We cannot be certain that the technologies that we have developed to repel spamming attacks will be able to eliminate all spam messages from our products. Our actions to combat spam may also require diversion of significant time and focus of our engineering team from improving our products. As a result of spamming activities, our users may use our products less or stop using them altogether, and result in continuing operational cost to us.

Similarly, terror and other criminal groups may use our products to promote their goals and encourage users to engage in terror and other illegal activities. We expect that as more people use our products, these groups will increasingly seek to misuse our products. Although we invest resources to combat these activities, including by suspending or terminating accounts we believe are violating our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines, we expect these groups will continue to


seek ways to act inappropriately and illegally on Snapchat. Combating these groups requires our engineering teamteams to divert significant time and focus from improving our products. In addition, we may not be able to control or stop Snapchat from becoming the preferred application of use by these groups, which may become public knowledge and seriously harm our reputation or lead to lawsuits or attention from regulators. If these activities increase on Snapchat, our reputation, user growth and user engagement, and operational cost structure could be seriously harmed.

Because we store, process, and use data, some of which contains personal information, we are subject to complex and evolving federal, state, and foreign laws and regulations regarding privacy, data protection, content, and other matters. Many of these laws and regulations are subject to change and uncertain interpretation, and could result in investigations, claims, changes to our business practices, increased cost of operations, and declines in user growth, retention, or engagement, any of which could seriously harm our business.

We are subject to a variety of laws and regulations in the United States and other countries that involve matters central to our business, including user privacy, security, rights of publicity, data protection, content, intellectual property, distribution, electronic contracts and other communications, competition, protection of minors, consumer protection, taxation, and online-payment services. These laws can be particularly restrictive in countries outside the United States. Both in the United States and abroad, these laws and regulations constantly evolve and remain subject to significant change. In addition, the application and interpretation of these laws and regulations are often uncertain, particularly in the new and rapidly evolving industry in which we operate. Because we store, process, and use data, some of which contains personal information, we are subject to complex and evolving federal, state, and foreign laws and regulations regarding privacy, data protection, content, and other matters. Many of these laws and regulations are subject to change and uncertain interpretation, and could result in investigations, claims, changes to our business practices, increased cost of operations, and declines in user growth, retention, or engagement, any of which could seriously harm our business.

Several proposals have recently been adopted or are currently pending before, and we believe a number of investigations into other technology companies are currently being conducted by, federal, state, and foreign legislative and regulatory bodies that could significantly affect our business. The General Data Protection RegulationGDPR in the European Union, which will gowent into effect in May 2018, placed new data protection obligations and restrictions on May 25, 2018,organizations and may require us to further change our policies and procedures and, ifprocedures. If we are not compliant with GDPR requirements, we may be subject to significant fines and our business may be seriously harmharmed. In addition, the California Consumer Privacy Act went into effect in January 2020 and places additional requirements on the handling of personal data. The CCPA also provides for civil penalties for violations, as well as a private right of action for data breaches, which may increase the likelihood and cost of data breach litigation. The potential effects of this legislation are far-reaching and may require us, our business.partners, and advertisers to modify data processing practices and policies and to incur substantial costs and expenses in an effort to comply. We expect other state and federal legislative and regulatory bodies may enact similar legislation regarding the handling of personal data, or conduct additional investigations into specific companies or the industry as a whole that could alter the existing regulatory environment in a manner that would be adverse to us. Furthermore, in December 2018, the Australian government passed the Assistance and Access Bill 2018 that provides Australian law enforcement authorities with mechanisms to make requests for


electronic communication, even if the data is end-to-end encrypted like in Snapchat, which may create new obligations for companies providing communication services and make their data less secure.

Our financial condition and results of operations will fluctuate from quarter to quarter, which makes them difficult to predict.

Our quarterly results of operations have fluctuated in the past and will fluctuate in the future. Additionally, we have a limited operating history with the current scale of our business, which makes it difficult to forecast our future results. As a result, you should not rely on our past quarterly results of operations as indicators of future performance. You should take into account the risks and uncertainties frequently encountered by companies in rapidly evolving markets.market segments. Our financial condition and results of operations in any given quarter can be influenced by numerous factors, many of which we are unable to predict or are outside of our control, including:

our ability to maintain and grow our user base and user engagement;

the development and introduction of new or redesigned products or services by us or our competitors;

the ability of our data service providers to scale effectively and timely provide the necessary technical infrastructure to offer our service;

our ability to attract and retain advertisers in a particular period;

seasonal fluctuations in spending by our advertisers and product usage by our users, each of which may change as our product offerings evolve or as our business grows;

the number of advertisements shown to users;

the pricing of our advertisements and other products;

our ability to demonstrate to advertisers the effectiveness of our advertisements;

the diversification and growth of revenue sources beyond current advertising;

increases in marketing, sales, and other operating expenses that we may incur to grow and expand our operations and to remain competitive;

our ability to maintain gross margins and operating margins;


our ability to maintain and grow our user base and user engagement;

 

the development and introduction of new or redesigned products or services by us or our competitors;

the ability of our data service providers to scale effectively and timely provide the necessary technical infrastructure to offer our service;

our ability to attract and retain advertisers in a particular period;

seasonal fluctuations in spending by our advertisers and product usage by our users, each of which may change as our product offerings evolve or as our business grows;

the number of advertisements shown to users;

the pricing of our advertisements and other products;

our ability to demonstrate to advertisers the effectiveness of our advertisements;

the diversification and growth of revenue sources beyond current advertising;

increases in marketing, sales, and other operating expenses that we may incur to grow and expand our operations and to remain competitive;

our ability to maintain operating margins, cash used in operating activities, and Free Cash Flow;

our ability to accurately forecast consumer demand for our hardware products and adequately manage inventory;

system failures or breaches of security or privacy;

system failures or breaches of security or privacy, and the costs associated with such breaches and remediations;

inaccessibility of Snapchat due to third-party actions;

inaccessibility of Snapchat, or certain features within Snapchat, due to third-party actions;

stock-based compensation expense;

stock-based compensation expense;

adverse litigation judgments, settlements, or other litigation-related costs;

our ability to effectively incentivize our workforce;

changes in the legislative or regulatory environment, including with respect to privacy, or enforcement by government regulators, including fines, orders, or consent decrees;

adverse litigation judgments, settlements, or other litigation-related costs, or product recalls;

fluctuations in currency exchange rates and changes in the proportion of our revenue and expenses denominated in foreign currencies;

changes in the legislative or regulatory environment, including with respect to privacy and data protection, or enforcement by government regulators, including fines, orders, or consent decrees;

fluctuations in the market values of our portfolio investments and interest rates;

fluctuations in currency exchange rates and changes in the proportion of our revenue and expenses denominated in foreign currencies;

changes in our effective tax rate;

fluctuations in the market values of our portfolio investments and interest rates or impairments of any assets on our balance sheet;

announcements by competitors of significant new products or acquisitions;

changes in our effective tax rate;

our ability to make accurate accounting estimates and appropriately recognize revenue for our products for which there are no relevant comparable products;

announcements by competitors of significant new products or acquisitions;

changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations, or principles; and

our ability to make accurate accounting estimates and appropriately recognize revenue for our products for which there are no relevant comparable products;

our ability to meet minimum spending commitments in agreements with our infrastructure providers;

changes in business or macroeconomic conditions.


changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations, or principles; and

changes in domestic and global business or macroeconomic conditions.

If we are unable to successfully grow our user base and further monetize our products, our business will suffer.

We have made, and are continuing to make, investments to enable users, partners, and advertisers to create compelling content and deliver advertising to our users. Existing and prospective Snapchat users and advertisers may not be successful in creating content that leads to and maintains user engagement. We are continuously seeking to balance the objectives of our users and advertisers with our desire to provide an optimal user experience. We do not seek to monetize all of our products nor do we focus our efforts on users with higher ARPU, and we may not be successful in achieving a balance that continues to attract and retain users and advertisers. If we are not successful in our efforts to grow or effectively monetize our user base, or if we are unable to build and maintain good relations with our advertisers, our user growth and user engagement and our business may be seriously harmed. In addition, we may expend significant resources to launch new products that we are unable to monetize, which may seriously harm our business.

Additionally, we may not succeed in further monetizing Snapchat. We currently monetize Snapchat by displaying in the application advertisements that we sell and advertisements sold by our partners. As a result, our financial performance and ability to grow revenue could be seriously harmed if:

we fail to increase or maintain Daily Active Users;

we fail to increase or maintain DAUs;

we fail to increase or maintain the amount of time spent on Snapchat or usage of our Creative Tools, Chat Service, or Storytelling Platform;

our user growth outpaces our ability to monetize our users, including if we don’t attract sufficient advertisers or if our user growth occurs in markets that are not as monetizable;

partners do not create engaging content for users or renew their agreements with us;

we fail to increase or maintain the amount of time spent on Snapchat, the amount of content that our users share, or the usage of our Creative Tools, Chat Service, or Storytelling Platform;

advertisers do not continue to introduce engaging advertisements;

partners do not create engaging content for users or renew their agreements with us;

advertisers reduce their advertising on Snapchat;

we fail to attract sufficient advertisers to utilize our self-serve platform to make the best use of our advertising inventory;

we fail to maintain good relationships with advertisers or attract new advertisers; or

advertisers do not continue to introduce engaging advertisements;

advertisers reduce their advertising on Snapchat;

the content on Snapchat does not maintain or gain popularity.

we fail to maintain good relationships with advertisers or attract new advertisers; or

the content on Snapchat does not maintain or gain popularity.


We cannot assure you that we will effectively manage our growth.

Our employee headcount and the scope and complexity of our business have increased significantly, with the number of full-time employees increasing from 1,859 as of December 31, 2016 to 3,069 as of December 31, 2017. We expect headcount growth to continue for the foreseeable future. The growth and expansion of our business, headcount, and products create significant challenges for our management, including managing multiple relationships with users, advertisers, partners, and other third parties, and constrain operational and financial resources. If our operations or the number of third-party


relationships continues to grow, our information-technology systems and our internal controls and procedures may not adequately support our operations. In addition, some members of our management do not have significant experience managing large global business operations, so our management may not be able to manage such growth effectively. To effectively manage our growth, we must continue to improve our operational, financial, and management processes and systems and effectively expand, train, and manage our employee base. As part of that effort, we recently reorganized the structure and operations of our ad sales team. Although we believe the reorganization will improve the efficiency of our sales team and result in better service for our advertisers over the long term, the reorganization may not have the intended effect and we may experience disruptions, employee turnover, and declines in revenue while our sales team and advertisers become accustomed to the new operations.

As our organization continues to growmature and we are required to implement more complex organizational management structures, we may also find it increasingly difficult to maintain the benefits of our corporate culture, including our ability to quickly develop and launch new and innovative products. This could negatively affect our business performance and seriously harm our business.

Our costs are growing rapidly,may increase faster than our revenue, which could seriously harm our business or increase our losses.

Providing our products to our users is costly, and we expect our expenses, including those related to people and hosting, to grow in the future. This expense growth will continue as we broaden our user base, as users increase the number of connections and amount of content they consume and share, as we develop and implement new product features that require more computing infrastructure, and as we hire additional employees to support potential future growth.grow our business. Historically, our costs have increased each year due to these factors, and we expect to continue to incur increasing costs. Our costs are based on development and release of new products and the addition of users and may not be offset by a corresponding growth ofin our revenue. We will continue to invest in our global infrastructure to provide our products quickly and reliably to all users around the world, including in countries where we do not expect significant short-term monetization, if any. Our expenses may be greater than we anticipate, and our investments to make our business and our technical infrastructure more efficient may not succeed and may outpace monetization efforts. In addition, we expect to increase marketing, sales, and other operating expenses to grow and expand our operations and to remain competitive. Increases in our costs without a corresponding increase in our revenue would increase our losses and could seriously harm our business and financial performance.

Our business depends on our ability to maintain and scale our technology infrastructure. Any significant disruption to our service could damage our reputation, result in a potential loss of users and decrease in user engagement, and seriously harm our business.

Our reputation and ability to attract, retain, and serve users depends on the reliable performance of Snapchat and our underlying technology infrastructure. We have in the past experienced, and may in the future experience, interruptions in the availability or performance of our products and services from time to time. Our systems may not be adequately designed with the necessary reliability and redundancy to avoid performance delays or outages that could seriously harm our business. If Snapchat is unavailable when users attempt to access it, or if it does not load as quickly as they expect, users may not return to Snapchat as often in the future, or at all. As our user base and the volume and types of information shared on Snapchat continue to grow, we will need an increasing amount of technology infrastructure, including network capacity and computing power, to continue to satisfy our users’ needs. It is possible that we may fail to effectively scale and grow our technology infrastructure to accommodate these increased demands. In addition, our business is subject to interruptions, delays, and failures resulting from earthquakes, other natural disasters, terrorism, and other catastrophic events.

A substantial portionSubstantially all of our network infrastructure is provided by third parties.parties, including Google Cloud and Amazon Web Services. Any disruption or failure in the services we receive from these providers could harm our ability to handle existing or increased traffic and could seriously harm our business. Any financial or other difficulties these providers face may seriously harm our business. And because we exercise little control over these providers, we are vulnerable to problems with the services they provide.


Our business emphasizes rapid innovation and prioritizes long-term user engagement over short-term financial condition or results of operations. That strategy may yield results that sometimes don’t align with the market’s expectations. If that happens, our stock price may be negatively affected.

Our business is growing and becoming more complex, and our success depends on our ability to quickly develop and launch new and innovative products. We believe our culture fosters this goal. Our focus on complexityinnovations and quick reactions could result in unintended outcomes or decisions that are poorly received by our users, advertisers, or partners. We have made, and expect to continue to make, significant investments to develop and launch new products and services and we are not yet able to determine whethercannot assure you that users will purchase or use such new products and services in the future. We will also continue to find effective ways to show our community new and existing products and alert them to events, holidays, relevant content, and meaningful opportunities to connect with their friends. These methods may provide temporary increases in engagement that may ultimately fail to attract and retain users. Our culture also prioritizes our long-term user engagement over short-term financial condition or results of operations. We frequently make decisions that may reduce our short-term revenue or profitability if we believe that the decisions benefit the aggregate user


experience and will thereby improve our financial performance over the long term. For example, we monitor how advertising on Snapchat affects our users’ experiences to ensure we do not deliver too many advertisements to our users, and we may decide to decrease the number of advertisements to ensure our users’ satisfaction in the product. In addition, we improve Snapchat based on feedback provided by our users, advertisers, and partners. These decisions may not produce the long-term benefits that we expect, in which case our user growth and engagement, our relationships with advertisers and partners, and our business could be seriously harmed.

If we are unable to protect our intellectual property, the value of our brand and other intangible assets may be diminished, and our business may be seriously harmed. If we need to license or acquire new intellectual property, we may incur substantial costs.

We aim to protect our confidential proprietary information, in part, by entering into confidentiality agreements and invention assignment agreements with all our employees, consultants, advisors, and any third parties who access or contribute to our proprietary know-how, information, or technology. We also rely on trademark, copyright, patent, trade secret, and domain-name-protection laws to protect our proprietary rights. In the United States and internationally, we have filed various applications to protect aspects of our intellectual property, and we currently hold a number of issued patents in multiple jurisdictions. In the future, we may acquire additional patents or patent portfolios, which could require significant cash expenditures. However, third parties may knowingly or unknowingly infringe our proprietary rights, third parties may challenge proprietary rights held by us, and pending and future trademark and patent applications may not be approved. In addition, effective intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which we operate or intend to operate our business. In any of these cases, we may be required to expend significant time and expense to prevent infringement or to enforce our rights. Although we have taken measures to protect our proprietary rights, there can be no assurance that others will not offer products or concepts that are substantially similar to ours and compete with our business. If we are unable to protect our proprietary rights or prevent unauthorized use or appropriation by third parties, the value of our brand and other intangible assets may be diminished, and competitors may be able to more effectively mimic our service and methods of operations. Any of these events could seriously harm our business.

In addition, we regularly contributehave contributed software source code under open-source licenses, and have made other technology we developed available under other open licenses, and we include open-source software in our products. From time to time, we may face claims from third parties claiming ownership of, or demanding release of, the open-source software or derivative works that we have developed using such software, which could include our proprietary source code, or otherwise seeking to enforce the terms of the applicable open-source license. These claims could result in litigation and could require us to make our software source code freely available, seek licenses from third parties to continue offering our products for certain uses, or cease offering the products associated with such software unless and until we can re-engineer them to avoid infringement, which may be very costly. For example, in January 2017, Vaporstream, Inc. filed a complaint against us in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint, which seeks injunctive relief among other remedies, alleges that certain Snapchat features infringe several Vaporstream patents. While we believe their claims are meritless, an unfavorable outcome in this litigation could seriously harm our business. If we are unable to protect our proprietary rights or prevent unauthorized use or appropriation by third parties, the value of our brand and other intangible assets may be diminished, and competitors may be able to more effectively mimic our service and methods of operations. Any of these events could seriously harm our business.

If our users do not continue to contribute content or their contributions are not perceived as valuable to other users, we may experience a decline in user growth, retention, and engagement on Snapchat, which could result in the loss of advertisers and revenue.

Our success depends on our ability to provide Snapchat users with engaging content, which in part depends on the content contributed by our users. If users, including influential users such as world leaders, government officials, celebrities, athletes, journalists, sports teams, media outlets, and brands, do not continue to contribute engaging content to Snapchat, our user growth, retention, and engagement may decline. That, in turn, may impair our ability to maintain good relationships with our advertisers or attract new advertisers, which may seriously harm our business.


Foreign government initiatives to restrict access to Snapchat in their countriesand restrictions could seriously harm our business.

Foreign data protection, privacy, consumer protection, content regulation, and other laws and regulations are often more restrictive than those in the United States. Foreign governments may censor Snapchat in their countries, restrict access to Snapchat from their countries entirely, impose laws on us that require data localization, or impose other restrictions that may affect their citizens’ ability to access Snapchat for an extended period of time or even indefinitely. If foreign governments think we are violating theirindefinitely, require data localization, or impose other laws or regulations that we cannot comply with, would be difficult for other reasons, they may seekus to restrictcomply with, or would require us to rebuild our products or the infrastructure for our products. Any restriction on access to Snapchat whichdue to foreign government actions or initiatives, or any withdrawal by us from certain countries because of such actions or initiatives, would giveadversely affect our DAUs, including by giving our competitors an opportunity to penetrate geographic markets that we cannot access. As a result, our user growth, retention, and engagement may be seriously harmed, and we may not be able to maintain or grow our revenue as anticipated and our business could be seriously harmed. For example, access to Google, which currently powers our infrastructure, is restricted in China, and we do not know if we will be able to enter the market in a manner acceptable to the Chinese government.


Our users may increasingly engage directly with our partners and advertisers instead of through Snapchat, which may negatively affect our advertising revenue and seriously harm our business.

We allow partners to display their advertisements on Snapchat. Using our products, some partners and advertisers not only can interact directly with our users but can also direct our users to content onwith third-party websites and products and downloads of third-party applications. The more our users engage with third-party websites and applications, the partner’s website directly. When users visit a partner’s website,less engagement we do not deliver advertisements to these websites. So, if our partners’ websites draw users awaymay get from Snapchat,them, which would adversely affect the sort of user activity that generates advertising opportunities may decline, whichrevenue we could negatively affect our advertising revenue.earn from them. Although we believe that Snapchat reaps significant long-term benefits from increased user engagement on content on Snapchat provided by our partners, these benefits may not offset the possible loss of advertising revenue, in which case our business could be seriously harmed.

If events occur that damage our reputation and brand our ability to expand our user base, advertisers, and partners may be impaired, andor reputation, our business may be seriously harmed.

We have developed a brand that we believe has contributed to our success. We also believe that maintaining and enhancing our brand is critical to expanding our user base, advertisers, and partners. Because many of our users join Snapchat on the invitation or recommendation of a friend or family member, one of our primary focuses is on ensuring that our users continue to view Snapchat and our brand favorably so that these referrals continue. Maintaining and enhancing our brand will depend largely on our ability to continue to provide useful, novel, fun, reliable, trustworthy, and innovative products, which we may not do successfully. We may introduce new products, make changes to existing products and services, or require our users to agree to new terms of service related to new and existing products that users do not like, which may negatively affect our brand in the short term, long term, or both. Additionally, our partners’ actions may affect our brand if users do not appreciate what those partners do on Snapchat. In the past, we have experienced, and we expect that in the future we will continue to experience, media, legislative, and regulatory scrutiny of our decisions regarding user privacy or other issues, which may seriously harm our reputation and brand. We may also fail to adequately support the needs of our users, advertisers, or partners, which could erode confidence in our brand. Maintaining and enhancing our brand may require us to make substantial investments and these investments may not be successful. If we fail to successfully promote and maintain our brand or if we incur excessive expenses in this effort, our business may be seriously harmed.

Unfavorable media coverage could seriously harm our business.

We and our founders also receive a high degree of media coverage globally. In the past, we have experienced, and we expect that we will continue to experience, media, legislative, and regulatory scrutiny. Unfavorable publicity regarding us, for example, our privacy practices, product changes, product quality, litigation, or regulatory activity, or regarding the actions of our partners, or our users, or other companies in our industry, could seriously harm our reputation. Such negativereputation and brand. Negative publicity and scrutiny could also adversely affect the size, demographics, engagement, and loyalty of our user base and result in decreased revenue, fewer app installs (or increased app un-installs), or slowerdeclining user growth rates, any of which could seriously harm our business.

Expanding and operating in international markets requires significant resources and management attention. If we are not successful in expanding and operating our business in international markets, we may incur significant costs, damage our brand, or need to lay off employees in those markets, any of which may seriously harm our reputation and business.

We have rapidly expanded to new international markets, including areaswhich may have very different cultures and commercial, legal, and regulatory systems than where we do not yet understand the full scope of commerce and culture.predominately operate. In connection with this rapidour international expansion, we have also hired new employees in many of these markets. This rapidinternational expansion may:

impede our ability to continuously monitor the performance of our international employees;

impede our ability to continuously monitor the performance of all of our employees;

result in hiring of employees who may not yet fully understand our business, products, and culture; or

result in hiring of employees who may not yet fully understand our business, products, and culture; or

cause us to expand in markets that may lack the culture and infrastructure needed to adopt our products.

cause us to expand in markets that may lack the culture and infrastructure needed to adopt our products.

These issues may eventually lead to layoffs of employees in these markets and may harm our ability to grow our business in these markets. In addition, scaling our business to international markets imposes complexity on our business, and


requires additional financial and management resources. We may not be able to manage growth and expansion effectively, which could damage our brand, result in significant costs, and seriously harm our business.

Operating our business requires a significant amount of cash, and we may not have sufficient cash flow from our business to pay our Convertible Notes, and any other debt when due, which may seriously harm our business.

Our ability to make principal or interest payments, or to refinance, the Convertible Notes or other indebtedness depends on our future performance, which is subject to many factors beyond our control. Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to service our debt and business. If we are unable to generate such cash flow, we may be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as selling assets, restructuring debt, obtaining additional debt financing, or issuing additional equity securities, any of which may be on terms that are not favorable to us or, in the case of equity securities, highly dilutive to our stockholders. Our ability to refinance the Convertible Notes or our other indebtedness will depend on various factors, including the available capital markets, our business, and our financial condition at such time. We may not be able to engage in any of these activities or on desirable terms, which could result in a default on our debt obligations. In addition, our existing and future debt agreements, including our Convertible Notes and Credit Facility, may contain restrictive covenants that may prohibit us from adopting any of these alternatives. Our failure to comply with these covenants could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of our debt, and would seriously harm our business.

In addition, holders of the Convertible Notes will have the right to require us to repurchase all or a portion of the Convertible Notes on the occurrence of a fundamental change at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Convertible Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the fundamental change repurchase date. Further, if a make-whole fundamental change as defined in the Indenture governing the Convertible Notes occurs prior to the maturity date of the Convertible Notes, we will in some cases be required to increase the conversion rate for a holder that elects to convert its Convertible Notes in connection with such make-whole fundamental change. On the conversion of the Convertible Notes, unless we elect to deliver solely shares of our Class A common stock to settle such conversion (other than paying cash in lieu of delivering any fractional share), we will be required to make cash payments for the Convertible Notes being converted. However, we may not have enough available cash or be able to obtain financing at the time we are required to make such repurchases of the Convertible Notes surrendered or pay cash with respect to the Convertible Notes being converted.

We have spent and anticipate spendingmay continue to spend substantial funds in connection with the tax liabilities on the settlement of RSUs.equity awards. The manner in which we fund these tax liabilities may cause us to spend substantial funds or dilute stockholders, either of which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

Given the large numberWhen our employee equity awards vest, we must withhold taxes and remit them to relevant taxing authorities on behalf of restricted stock units, or RSUs, that initially settled in connection with our IPO, we expended approximately $206.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to satisfy tax withholding and remittance obligations. To settle these RSUs, we net-settled the awards by delivering an aggregate of approximately 14.6 million shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock to RSU holders and withholding an aggregate of approximately 12.1 million shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we expended approximately $394.2 million to satisfy tax withholding and remittance obligations. We withheld and remitted income taxes at applicable statutory rates based on the then-current value of the underlying shares.


employees. To fund the withholding and remittance obligations in the future,for equity awards, we may sellhave either used our existing cash or sold a portion of vested equity securities on our behalf orawards on behalf of our employees near the applicable settlement dates in an amount that is substantially equivalent to the number of shares of common stock that we would withhold in connection with these settlements, such thatsettlements. In the future, we may also sell equity on our behalf and use the proceeds to fund the withholding and remittance obligations for equity awards. Any of these methods may have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

If we sell shares on behalf of our employees, although those newly issued shares should not be dilutive. However,dilutive, such sales to the market could result in the event thata decline to our stock price. If we use our existing cash, or if our cash reserves are not sufficient, we may choose to issue equity securities or borrow funds under our revolving credit facility. In such an event, we cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully match the proceeds of any such equity financing to the amount of thisthen applicable tax liability. In addition,liability, and any such equity financing could result in a decline in our stock price.price and be dilutive to existing stockholders. If we elect not to fully fund tax withholding and remittance obligations through the issuance of equity or we are unable to complete such an offering due to market conditions or otherwise, we may choose to borrow funds under our five-year senior unsecured revolving credit facility, or our Credit Facility, use a substantial portion of our existing cash, or rely on a combination of these alternatives. In the event that we elect to satisfy tax withholding and remittance obligations in whole or in part by drawing on our Credit Facility,revolving credit facility, our interest expense and principal repayment requirements could increase significantly, which could seriously harm our business.

Our products are highly technical and may contain undetected software bugs or hardware errors, which could manifest in ways that could seriously harm our reputation and our business.

Our products are highly technical and complex. Snapchat, and Spectacles, or any other products we may introduce in the future, may contain undetected software bugs, hardware errors, and other vulnerabilities. These bugs and errors can manifest in any number of ways in our products, including through diminished performance, security vulnerabilities, malfunctions, or even permanently disabled products. We have a practice of rapidly updating our products and some errors in our products may be discovered only after a product has been released or shipped and used by users, and may in some cases be detected only under certain circumstances or after extended use. Spectacles, as an eyewear product, is regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug


Administration, or the FDA, and may malfunction in a way that physically harms a user. We offer a limited one-year warranty in the United States and a limited two-year warranty in Europe, and any such defects discovered in our products after commercial release could result in a loss of sales and users, which could seriously harm our business. Any errors, bugs, or vulnerabilities discovered in our code after release could damage our reputation, drive away users, lower revenue, and expose us to damages claims, any of which could seriously harm our business.

We could also face claims for product liability, tort, or breach of warranty. In addition, our product contracts with users contain provisions relating to warranty disclaimers and liability limitations, which may not be upheld. Defending a lawsuit, regardless of its merit, is costly and may divert management’s attention and seriously harm our reputation and our business. In addition, if our liability insurance coverage proves inadequate or future coverage is unavailable on acceptable terms or at all, our business could be seriously harmed.

As our business expands, we may offer credit to our partners to stay competitive,We have been and as a result we may be exposed to credit risk of some of our partners, which may seriously harm our business.

As our business continues to grow and expand, we may decide to engage in business with some of our partners on an open credit basis. While we may monitor individual partner payment capability when we grant open credit arrangements and maintain allowances we believe are adequate to cover exposure for doubtful accounts, we cannot assure investors these programs will be effective in managing our credit risks in the future, especially as we expand our business internationally and engage with partners that we may not be familiar with. If we are unable to adequately control these risks, our business could be seriously harmed.

We may be subject to regulatory investigations and proceedings in the future, which could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices in a way that could seriously harm our business.

It is possible that aWe have been and may in the future be subject to investigations and inquiries from government entities. These investigations and inquiries, and our compliance with any associated regulatory inquiry might forceorders or consent decrees, may require us to change our policies or practices. And were wepractices, subject us to violate existing or future regulatory orders or consent decrees, we might incur substantial monetary fines or other penalties or sanctions, divert management’s attention, and require us to incur significant legal and other penalties thatexpenses, any of which could seriously harm our business. In addition, it is possible that future orders issued by, or enforcement actions initiated by, regulatory authorities could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices in a way that could seriously harm our business.

For example, in December 2014, the FTC resolved an investigation into somepast, we responded to subpoenas and requests for information made by staff from the U.S. Department of Justice, or DOJ, and the SEC. We believe that these regulators were investigating issues related to allegations asserted in our early practices by issuing a final order. That order requires, among other things,federal securities class actions about our IPO disclosures. In September 2019, both the DOJ and SEC provided us with written confirmations that we establish a robust privacy program to govern how we treat user data. During the 20-year termthey are no longer pursuing their investigations of the order, we must complete bi-annual independent privacy audits. In addition, in June 2014, we entered into a 10-year assurance of discontinuance with the Attorney General of Maryland implementing similar practices, including measures to prevent minors under the age of 13 from creating accounts and providing annual compliance reports. Violating existing or future regulatory orders or consent decrees could subject us to substantial monetary fines and other penalties that could seriously harm our business. Similarly, we may be subject to additional general inquiries from time to time, which may seriously harm our business.these matters.


We are currently, and expect to be in the future, party to patent lawsuits and other intellectual property claims that are expensive and time-consuming. If resolved adversely, these lawsuits and claims could seriously harm our business.

Companies in the mobile, camera, communication, media, internet, and other technology-related industries own large numbers of patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, and other intellectual property rights, and frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement, misappropriation, or other violations of intellectual property or other rights. In addition, various “non-practicing entities” that own patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, and other intellectual property rights often attempt to aggressively assert their rights to extract value from technology companies. Furthermore, from time to time we may introduce new products or make other business changes, including in areas where we currently do not compete, which could increase our exposure to patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret, and other intellectual property rights claims from competitors and non-practicing entities. From time to time, we receive letters from patent holders alleging that some of our products infringe their patent rights and from trademark holders alleging infringement of their trademark rights. We have been subject to, litigation with respect to third-party patents, trademarks, and other intellectual property and we expect to continue to be subject to, claims and legal proceedings from holders of patents, trademarks, copyrights, and other intellectual property litigation.rights alleging that some of our products or content infringe their rights. For example, in January 2017, Vaporstream, Inc. filed a complaint against us in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint, which seeks injunctive relief among other remedies, alleges that certain Snapchat features infringe several Vaporstream patents. A trial date relating to these claims has been scheduled for early 2020. In addition, in April 2018, Blackberry Limited filed a lawsuit against us alleging that we infringe six of its patents. This lawsuit was recently dismissed after four of the patents were ruled to be invalid; however, Blackberry Limited has since appealed the ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Likewise, in January 2020, You Map, Inc. filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against us, our subsidiary Zenly, and certain of our respective employees alleging that we misappropriated various trade secrets regarding map technology used in Snapchat’s and Zenly’s map products. While we believe we have meritorious defenses to these claims, an unfavorable outcome in these lawsuits could seriously harm our business. If these or other matters continue in the future or we need to enter into licensing arrangements, which may not be available to us or on terms favorable to us, it may increase our costs and decrease the value of our products, and our business could be seriously harmed.

We rely on a variety of statutory and common-law frameworks for the content we provide our users, including the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or DMCA, the Communications Decency Act, or CDA, and the fair-use doctrine. The DMCA limits, but does not necessarily eliminate, our potential liability for caching, hosting, listing, or linking to third-party content that may include materials that infringe copyrights or other rights. The CDA further limits our potential liability for content uploaded onto Snapchat by third parties. And the fair-use doctrine (and related doctrines in other countries) limits our potential liability for featuring third-party intellectual property content produced by us for purposes such as reporting, commentary, and parody. However, each of these statutes and doctrines is subject to uncertain judicial interpretation and regulatory and legislative amendments. For example, there are currently efforts underwayCongress amended the CDA in Congress to amend the CDA2018 in ways that could expose some Internet platforms to an increased risk of litigation.litigation, and members of Congress proposed further amendments in 2019. Moreover, some of these statutes and doctrines provide protection only or primarily in the United States. If the rules around these doctrines change, if international jurisdictions refuse to apply similar protections, or if a court were to disagree with our application of those rules to our service, we could incur liability and our business could be seriously harmed.


From time to time, we are involved in class-action lawsuits and other litigation matters that are expensive and time-consuming. If resolved adversely, lawsuitstime-consuming and other litigation matters could seriously harm our business.

We are involved in numerous lawsuits, including putative class-action lawsuits brought by users manyand investors, some of which may claim statutory damages. We anticipate that we will continue to be a target for lawsuits in the future. Because we have millions of users, the plaintiffs in class-action cases filedlawsuits against us that are purportedly filed by or on behalf of users typically claim enormous monetary damages in the aggregate even if the alleged per-user harm is small or non-existent. Similarly, because we have a large number of stockholders, class-action lawsuits on securities theories typically claim enormous monetary damages in the aggregate even if the alleged loss per stockholder is small. Any litigation to which we are a party may result in an onerous or unfavorable judgment that might not be reversed on appeal, or we may decide to settle lawsuits on adverse terms. Any such negative outcome could result in payments of substantial monetary damages or fines, or changes to our products or business practices, and seriously harm our business. Even if the outcome of any such litigation or claim is favorable, defending them is costly and can impose a significant burden on management and employees. We may also receive unfavorable preliminary, interim, or final rulings in the course of litigation. For example, beginning on May 16, 2017, we, certain of our officers and directors, and the underwriters of our IPO were named as defendants in securities class actions in federal and state courts purportedly brought on behalf of purchasers of our Class A common stock. Any litigationIn January 2020, we entered into a preliminary agreement to whichsettle the federal and state securities class actions.

We may face lawsuits or incur liability based on information posted to Snapchat.

We have faced, currently face, and will continue to face claims relating to information that is published or made available on Snapchat. In particular, the nature of our business exposes us to claims related to defamation, intellectual property rights, rights of publicity and privacy, and personal injury torts. For example, we do not monitor or edit the vast majority of content that is communicated through Snapchat, and such content may expose us to lawsuits. This risk is enhanced in certain jurisdictions outside the United States where our protection from liability for third-party actions may be unclear or evolving and where we may be less protected under local laws than we are a party may result in the United States. In addition, there have been various Congressional efforts to restrict the scope of the protections available to online platforms under Section 230 of the CDA, including an onerousamendment in 2018 and more recent proposed amendments, which could decrease or unfavorable judgment that may not be reversed on appeal, orchange our protections from liability for third-party content in the United States. We could incur significant costs investigating and defending such claims and, if we may decide to settle lawsuits on similarly unfavorable terms. Any such negative outcomeare found liable, significant damages. We could result in payments of substantial monetary damages oralso face fines or changesorders restricting or blocking our services in particular geographies as a result of content hosted on our services. For example, legislation in Germany may impose significant fines for failure to our products or business practices,comply with certain content removal and accordinglydisclosure obligations. If any of these events occur, our business could be seriously harmed. Although the results of lawsuits

We plan to continue expanding our international operations where we have limited operating experience and claims cannotmay be predicted with certainty, management does not believesubject to increased business and economic risks that the final outcome of those matters that we currently face willcould seriously harm our business. However, defending

We plan to continue expanding our business operations abroad and translating our products into other languages. Snapchat is currently available in more than 30 languages, and we have offices in more than 15 countries. We plan to enter new international markets where we have limited or no experience in marketing, selling, and deploying our products and advertisements. Our limited experience and infrastructure in such markets, or the lack of a critical mass of users in such markets, may make it more difficult for us to effectively monetize any increase in DAUs in those markets, and may increase our costs without a corresponding increase in revenue. If we fail to deploy or manage our operations in international markets successfully, our business may suffer. In the future, as our international operations increase, or more of our expenses are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, our operating results may be more greatly affected by fluctuations in the exchange rates of the currencies in which we do business. In addition, as our international operations and sales continue to grow, we are subject to a variety of risks inherent in doing business internationally, including:

political, social, and economic instability;

risks related to the legal and regulatory environment in foreign jurisdictions, including with respect to privacy, and unexpected changes in laws, regulatory requirements, and enforcement;

potential damage to our brand and reputation due to compliance with local laws, including potential censorship and requirements to provide user information to local authorities;

fluctuations in currency exchange rates;

higher levels of credit risk and payment fraud;

complying with tax requirements of multiple jurisdictions;

enhanced difficulties of integrating any foreign acquisitions;


complying with a variety of foreign laws, including certain employment laws requiring national collective bargaining agreements that set minimum salaries, benefits, working conditions, and termination requirements;

reduced protection for intellectual-property rights in some countries;

difficulties in staffing and managing global operations and the increased travel, infrastructure, and compliance costs associated with multiple international locations;

regulations that might add difficulties in repatriating cash earned outside the United States and otherwise preventing us from freely moving cash;

import and export restrictions and changes in trade regulation;

complying with statutory equity requirements;

complying with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act, and similar laws in other jurisdictions; and

export controls and economic sanctions administered by the Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security and the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control.

If we are unable to expand internationally and manage the complexity of our global operations successfully, our business could be seriously harmed.

New legislation that would change U.S. or foreign taxation of business activities, including the imposition of tax based on gross revenue, could seriously harm our business.

Reforming the taxation of international businesses has been a priority for politicians, and a wide variety of changes have been proposed or enacted. Due to the large and expanding scale of our international business activities, any changes in the taxation of such activities may increase our tax expense, the amount of taxes we pay, or both, and seriously harm our business. For example, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or the Tax Act, was enacted in December 2017 and significantly reformed the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. The Tax Act lowered U.S. federal corporate income tax rates, changed the utilization of future net operating loss carryforwards, allowed for the expensing of certain capital expenditures, and put into effect sweeping changes to U.S. taxation of international business activities.

In addition, many jurisdictions and intergovernmental organizations have been discussing proposals that may change various aspects of the existing framework under which our tax obligations are determined in many of the countries in which we do business. Some jurisdictions have enacted, and others have proposed, taxes based on gross receipts applicable to digital services regardless of profitability. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development has been working on a proposal that may change how taxable presence for digital services is defined and result in the imposition of taxes based on net income in countries where we have no physical presence.

We continue to examine the impact these claimsand other tax reforms may have on our business. The impact of these and other tax reforms is uncertain and one or more of these or similar measures could seriously harm our business.

Exposure to United Kingdom political developments, including the effect of its withdrawal from the European Union, could be costly and can imposedifficult to comply with and could seriously harm our business.

In June 2016, a referendum was passed in the United Kingdom to leave the European Union, commonly referred to as “Brexit.” This decision created an uncertain political and economic environment in the United Kingdom and other European Union countries, and the formal process for leaving the European Union has taken years to complete. The United Kingdom formally left the European Union on January 31, 2020, and is now in a transition period through December 31, 2020. We have licensed a portion of our intellectual property to one of our United Kingdom subsidiaries and have based a significant burdenportion of our non-U.S. operations in the United Kingdom. Although the United Kingdom will remain in the European Union single market and customs union during the transition period, the long-term nature of the United Kingdom’s relationship with the European Union is unclear and there is considerable uncertainty as to when any agreement will be reached and implemented. The political and economic instability created by Brexit has caused and may continue to cause significant volatility in global financial markets and uncertainty regarding the regulation of data protection in the United Kingdom. In particular, although the United Kingdom enacted a Data Protection Act in May 2018 that is consistent with the EU General Data Protection Regulation, uncertainty remains regarding how data transfers to and from the United Kingdom will be regulated. Brexit could also have the effect of disrupting the free movement of goods, services, capital, and people between the United Kingdom, the European Union, and elsewhere. The full effect of Brexit is uncertain and depends on any agreements the United Kingdom may make with the European Union and others. Consequently, no assurance can be given


about the impact of the outcome and our business, including operational and tax policies, may be seriously harmed or require reassessment.

We plan to continue to make acquisitions and investments in other companies, which could require significant management attention, disrupt our business, dilute our stockholders, and seriously harm our business.

As part of our business strategy, we have made and intend to make acquisitions to add specialized employees and complementary companies, products, and technologies, as well as investments in other companies in furtherance of our strategic objectives. Our ability to acquire and successfully integrate larger or more complex companies, products, and technologies is unproven. In the future, we may not be able to find other suitable acquisition or investment candidates, and we may receivenot be able to complete acquisitions or investments on favorable terms, if at all. Our previous and future acquisitions and investments may not achieve our goals, and any future acquisitions or investments we complete could be viewed negatively by users, advertisers, partners, or investors. In addition, if we fail to successfully close transactions or integrate new teams, or integrate the products and technologies associated with these acquisitions into our company, our business could be seriously harmed. Any integration process may require significant time and resources, and we may not be able to manage the process successfully. We may not successfully evaluate or use the acquired products, technology, and personnel, or accurately forecast the financial impact of an acquisition or investment transaction, including accounting charges. We may also incur unanticipated liabilities that we assume as a result of acquiring companies. We may have to pay cash, incur debt, or issue equity securities to pay for any acquisition or investment, any of which could seriously harm our business. Selling equity to finance any such acquisition or investment would also dilute our stockholders. Incurring debt would increase our fixed obligations and could also include covenants or other restrictions that would impede our ability to manage our operations.

In addition, it generally takes several months after the closing of an acquisition to finalize the purchase price allocation. Therefore, it is possible that our valuation of an acquisition may change and result in unanticipated write-offs or charges, impairment of our goodwill, or a material change to the fair value of the assets and liabilities associated with a particular acquisition, any of which could seriously harm our business.

Our acquisition and investment strategy may not succeed if we are unable to remain attractive to target companies or expeditiously close transactions. Issuing shares of Class A common stock to fund an acquisition or investment would cause economic dilution to existing stockholders but not voting dilution. If we develop a reputation for being a difficult acquirer or having an unfavorable preliminary, interim,work environment, or final rulingstarget companies view our non-voting Class A common stock unfavorably, we may be unable to consummate key acquisition transactions essential to our corporate strategy and our business may be seriously harmed.

As our business expands, we have offered and may continue to offer credit to our partners to stay competitive, and as a result we may be exposed to credit risk of some of our partners, which may seriously harm our business.

As our business continues to grow and expand, we may decide to engage in business with some of our partners on an open credit basis. While we may monitor individual partner payment capability when we grant open credit arrangements and maintain allowances we believe are adequate to cover exposure for doubtful accounts, we cannot assure investors these programs will be effective in managing our credit risks in the coursefuture, especially as our business expands, engage with partners that have limited operating history, or engage with partners that we may not be familiar with. If we are unable to adequately control these risks, our business could be seriously harmed.

If we default on our credit obligations, our operations may be interrupted and our business could be seriously harmed.

We have a Credit Facility that we may draw on to finance our operations, acquisitions, and other corporate purposes, such as funding our tax-withholding and remittance obligations in connection with settling equity awards. If we default on these credit obligations, our lenders may:

require repayment of any outstanding amounts drawn on our Credit Facility;

terminate our Credit Facility; or

require us to pay significant damages.

If any of litigation,these events occur, our operations may be interrupted and our ability to fund our operations or obligations, as well as our business, could be seriously harmed. In addition, our Credit Facility contains operating covenants, including customary limitations on the incurrence of certain indebtedness and liens, restrictions on certain intercompany transactions, and limitations on the amount of dividends and stock repurchases. Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond our control, and breaches of these covenants could result in a default under the Credit Facility and any future financial agreements into which we may enter. If not waived, defaults could cause our outstanding indebtedness under our Credit Facility and any future financing agreements that we may enter into to become immediately due and


payable. For more information on our Credit Facility, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

We may have exposure to greater-than-anticipated tax liabilities, which could seriously harm our business.

Our income tax obligations are based on our corporate operating structure and third-party and intercompany arrangements, including the manner in which we develop, value, and use our intellectual property and the valuations of our intercompany transactions. The tax laws applicable to our international business activities, including the laws of the United States and other jurisdictions, are subject to change and uncertain interpretation. The taxing authorities of the jurisdictions in which we operate may challenge our methodologies for valuing developed technology, intercompany arrangements, or transfer pricing, which could increase our worldwide effective tax rate and the amount of taxes we pay and seriously harm our business. Taxing authorities may also determine that the manner in which we operate our business is not consistent with how we report our income, which could increase our effective tax rate and the amount of taxes we pay and seriously harm our business. In addition, our future income taxes could fluctuate because of earnings being lower than anticipated in jurisdictions that have lower statutory tax rates and higher than anticipated in jurisdictions that have higher statutory tax rates, by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, or by changes in tax laws, regulations, or accounting principles. We are subject to regular review and audit by U.S. federal and state and foreign tax authorities. Any adverse outcome from a review or audit could seriously harm our business. In addition, determining our worldwide provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities requires significant judgment by management, and there are many transactions where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Although we believe that our estimates are reasonable, the ultimate tax outcome may differ from the amounts recorded in our financial statements for such period or periods and may seriously harm our business.

Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited, each of which could seriously harm our business.

As of December 31, 2019, we had U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $4.0 billion and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $2.3 billion, as well as U.K. net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $1.3 billion. We also accumulated U.S. federal and state research tax credits of $225.2 million and $135.8 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2019. Under Sections 382 and 383 of the Code, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change net operating loss carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes, such as research tax credits, to offset its post-change income and taxes may be limited. In general, an “ownership change” occurs if there is a cumulative change in our ownership by “5% shareholders” that exceeds 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period. Similar rules may apply under state tax laws. In the event that we experience one or more ownership changes as a result of future transactions in our stock, then we may be limited in our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and other tax assets to reduce taxes owed on the net taxable income that we earn.

Additionally, for net operating loss carryforwards arising in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, the Tax Act limits a taxpayer’s ability to utilize such carryforwards to 80% of taxable income. In addition, net operating loss carryforwards arising in tax years ending after December 31, 2017 can be carried forward indefinitely, but carryback is generally prohibited. Net operating loss carryforwards generated by us before January 1, 2018 will not be subject to the taxable income limitation and will continue to have a twenty-year carryforward period. However, the changes in the carryforward and carryback periods as well as the new limitation on use of net operating losses may significantly impact our ability to use net operating loss carryforwards generated after December 31, 2017, as well as the timing of any such use, and could seriously harm our business. In the U.K., net operating loss carryforwards can be carried forward indefinitely, however, use of such carryforwards in a given year is generally limited to 50% of such year’s taxable income and may be subject to ownership change rules that restrict the use of net operating loss carryforwards.

Any limitations on the ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and other tax assets could seriously harm our business.

If our goodwill or intangible assets become impaired, we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings, which could seriously harm our business.

Under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, we review our intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at least annually. As of December 31, 2019, we had recorded a total of $853.3 million of goodwill and intangible assets, net related to our acquisitions. An adverse change in market conditions, particularly if such change has the effect of changing one of our critical assumptions or estimates, could result in a change to the estimation of fair value that could result in an impairment charge to our goodwill or intangible assets. Any such material charges may seriously harm our business.


We cannot be certain that additional financing will be available on reasonable terms when needed, or at all, which could seriously harm our business.

We have incurred net losses and negative cash flow from operations for all prior periods, and we may not achieve or maintain profitability. As a result, we may need additional financing. Our ability to obtain additional financing, if and when required, will depend on investor demand, our operating performance, our credit rating, the condition of the capital markets, and other factors. To the extent we use available funds or draw on our Credit Facility, we may need to raise additional funds and we cannot assure investors that additional financing will be available to us on favorable terms when required, or at all. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity, equity-linked, or debt securities, those securities may have rights, preferences, or privileges senior to the rights of our Class A common stock, and our existing stockholders may experience dilution. In the event that we are unable to obtain additional financing on favorable terms, our interest expense and principal repayment requirements could increase significantly, which could seriously harm our business.

We do not have manufacturing capabilities and depend on a single contract manufacturer.manufacturers. If we encounter problems with thisour contract manufacturermanufacturers or if the manufacturing process stops or is delayed for any reason, we may not deliver our hardware products, such as Spectacles, to our customers on time, which may seriously harm our business.

We have limited manufacturing experience for our only physical product, Spectacles, and we do not have any internal manufacturing capabilities. Instead, we rely on one contract manufacturermanufacturers to build Spectacles. Our contract manufacturer ismanufacturers are vulnerable to capacity constraints and reduced component availability, and our control over delivery schedules, manufacturing yields, and costs, particularly when components are in short supply, or if we introduce a new product or feature, is limited. In addition, we have limited control over our manufacturer’smanufacturers’ quality systems and controls, and therefore must rely on our manufacturermanufacturers to manufacture our products to our quality and performance standards and specifications. Delays, component shortages, including custom components that are manufactured for us at our direction, global trade conditions and agreements, and other manufacturing and supply problems could impair the distribution of our products and ultimately our brand. For example, the current U.S. Administration has threatened tougher trade terms with China and other countries, leading to the imposition or expected imposition of significant tariffs, which may adversely affect our products and seriously harm our business. Furthermore, any adverse change in our contract manufacturer’smanufacturers’ financial or business condition or our relationship with theour contract manufacturermanufacturers could disrupt our ability to supply our products to our retailers and distributors. If we are required to change our


contract manufacturermanufacturers or assume internal manufacturing operations, we may lose revenue, incur increased costs, and damage our reputation and brand. Qualifying a new contract manufacturer and commencing production is expensive and time-consuming. In addition, if we experience increased demand for our products, we may need to increase our component purchases, contract-manufacturing capacity, and internal test and quality functions. The inability of our contract manufacturers to provide us with adequate supplies of high-quality products could delay our order fulfillment, and may require us to change the design of our products to meet this increased demand. Any redesign would require us to re-qualify our products with any applicable regulatory bodies, which would be costly and time-consuming. This may lead to unsatisfied customers and users and increase costs to us, which could seriously harm our business.

Components used in our products may fail as a result of a manufacturing, design, or other defect over which we have no control, and render our devices inoperable.

We rely on third-party component suppliers to provide some of the functionalities needed to operate and use our products, such as Spectacles. Any errors or defects in that third-party technology could result in errors in our products that could seriously harm our business. If these components have a manufacturing, design, or other defect, they can cause our products to fail and render them permanently inoperable. For example, the typical means by which our Spectacles product connects to mobile devices is by way of a Bluetooth transceiver located in the Spectacles product. If the Bluetooth transceiver in our Spectacles product were to fail, it would not be able to connect to a user’s mobile device and Spectacles would not be able to deliver any content to the mobile device and the Snapchat application. As a result, we would have to replace these products at our sole cost and expense. Should we have a widespread problem of this kind, the reputational damage and the cost of replacing these products could seriously harm our business.

The FDA and other state and foreign regulatory agencies regulate Spectacles. We may develop future products that are regulated as medical devices by the FDA. Government authorities, primarily the FDA and corresponding regulatory agencies, regulate the medical device industry. Unless there is an exemption, we must obtain regulatory approval from the FDA and corresponding agencies before we can market or sell a new regulated product or make a significant modification to an existing product. Obtaining regulatory clearances to market a medical device can be costly and time-consuming, and we may not be able to obtain these clearances or approvals on a timely basis, or at all, for future products. Any delay in, or failure to receive or maintain, clearance or approval for any medical device products under development could prevent us from launching new products. We could seriously harm our business and the ability to sell our products if we experience any product problems requiring FDA reporting, if we fail to comply with applicable FDA and other state or foreign agency


regulations, or if we are subject to enforcement actions such as fines, civil penalties, injunctions, product recalls, or failure to obtain FDA or other regulatory clearances or approvals.

We may facehave faced inventory risk with respect to our Spectacles products.

We have been and may continue toin the future be exposed to inventory risks related to Spectacles as a result of rapid changes in product cycles and pricing, defective merchandise, changes in consumer demand and consumer spending patterns, changes in consumer tastes with respect to Spectaclesour products, and other factors. We try to accurately predict these trends and avoid overstocking or understocking inventory. Demand for products, however, can change significantly between the time inventory or components are ordered and the date of sale. The acquisition of certain types of inventory or components may require significant lead-time and prepayment and they may not be returnable. Failure to manage our inventory, supplier commitments, or customer expectations could seriously harm our business.

Our offices are dispersed in various cities, and we do not have a designated headquarters office, which may negatively affect employee morale and could seriously harm our business.

We have many offices, both domestic and abroad, with our principal offices being located in the Los Angeles area. But we do not have one designated headquarters office; we instead have many office buildings that are dispersed throughout the area. This diffuse structure may prevent us from fostering positive employee morale and encouraging social interaction among our employees and different business units. Moreover, because our office buildings are dispersed throughout the area, we may be unable to adequately oversee employees and business functions. If we cannot compensate for these and other issues caused by this geographically dispersed office structure, we may lose employees, which could seriously harm our business.


We may face lawsuits or incur liability based on information retrieved from or transmitted over the internet and then posted to Snapchat.

We have faced, currently face, and will continue to face claims relating to information that is published or made available on Snapchat. In particular, the nature of our business exposes us to claims related to defamation, intellectual property rights, rights of publicity and privacy, and personal injury torts. For example, we do not monitor or edit the vast majority of content that appears on Snapchat. This risk is enhanced in certain jurisdictions outside the United States where our protection from liability for third-party actions may be unclear and where we may be less protected under local laws than we are in the United States. In addition, there have been various Congressional efforts to restrict the scope of the protections available to online platforms under Section 230 of the CDA, and our current protections from liability for third-party content in the United States could decrease or change. We could incur significant costs investigating and defending such claims and, if we are found liable, significant damages. We could also face fines or orders restricting or blocking our services in particular geographies as a result of content hosted on our services. For example, recently enacted legislation in Germany may impose significant fines for failure to comply with certain content removal and disclosure obligations. If any of these events occur, our business could be seriously harmed.

We plan to continue expanding our operations abroad where we have limited operating experience and may be subject to increased business and economic risks that could seriously harm our business.

We plan to continue expanding our business operations abroad and translating our products into other languages. Snapchat is currently available in more than 20 languages, and we have offices in more than ten countries. We plan to enter new international markets where we have limited or no experience in marketing, selling, and deploying our products. If we fail to deploy or manage our operations in international markets successfully, our business may suffer. In the future, as our international operations increase, or more of our expenses are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, our operating results may be more greatly affected by fluctuations in the exchange rates of the currencies in which we do business. In addition, we are subject to a variety of risks inherent in doing business internationally, including:

political, social, and economic instability;

risks related to the legal and regulatory environment in foreign jurisdictions, including with respect to privacy, and unexpected changes in laws, regulatory requirements, and enforcement;

potential damage to our brand and reputation due to compliance with local laws, including potential censorship and requirements to provide user information to local authorities;

fluctuations in currency exchange rates;

higher levels of credit risk and payment fraud;

complying with tax requirements of multiple jurisdictions;

enhanced difficulties of integrating any foreign acquisitions;

complying with a variety of foreign laws, including certain employment laws requiring national collective bargaining agreements that set minimum salaries, benefits, working conditions, and termination requirements;

reduced protection for intellectual-property rights in some countries;

difficulties in staffing and managing global operations and the increased travel, infrastructure, and compliance costs associated with multiple international locations;

regulations that might add difficulties in repatriating cash earned outside the United States and otherwise preventing us from freely moving cash;

import and export restrictions and changes in trade regulation;

complying with statutory equity requirements;

complying with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act, and similar laws in other jurisdictions; and

export controls and economic sanctions administered by the Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security and the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control.


If we are unable to expand internationally and manage the complexity of our global operations successfully, our business could be seriously harmed.

New legislation that would change U.S. or foreign taxation of international business activities or other tax-reform policies, including the imposition of tax based on gross income, could seriously harm our business.

Reforming the taxation of international businesses has been a priority for politicians, and a wide variety of potential changes have been proposed. Some proposals, several of which have been enacted, impose incremental taxes on gross revenue, regardless of profitability. Due to the large and expanding scale of our international business activities, any changes in the taxation of such activities may increase our worldwide effective tax rate and the amount of taxes we pay and seriously harm our business.

For example, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or the Tax Act, was enacted on December 22, 2017 and significantly reforms the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. The Tax Act lowers U.S. federal corporate income tax rates, changes the utilization of future net operating loss carryforwards, allows for the expensing of certain capital expenditures, and puts into effect sweeping changes to U.S. taxation of international business activities. As a result, our net U.S. deferred tax assets and corresponding valuation allowances will be revalued at the new U.S. corporate rate. We continue to examine the impact this tax reform legislation may have on our business. The impact of this tax reform on us and on holders of our common stock is uncertain and could seriously harm our business.

Exposure to United Kingdom political developments, including the outcome of the referendum on membership in the European Union, could be costly and difficult to comply with and could seriously harm our business.

In June 2016, a referendum was passed in the United Kingdom to leave the European Union, commonly referred to as “Brexit.” This decision creates an uncertain political and economic environment in the United Kingdom and other European Union countries, even though the formal process for leaving the European Union may take years to complete. This formal process began in March 2017, when the United Kingdom served notice to the European Council under Article 50 of the Treaty of Lisbon. We have licensed a portion of our intellectual property to one of our United Kingdom subsidiaries and have based a significant portion of our non-U.S. operations in the United Kingdom. The long-term nature of the United Kingdom’s relationship with the European Union is unclear and there is considerable uncertainty when any relationship will be agreed and implemented. The political and economic instability created by Brexit has caused and may continue to cause significant volatility in global financial markets and uncertainty regarding the regulation of data protection in the United Kingdom. In particular, it is unclear whether the United Kingdom will enact data protection laws or regulations designed to be consistent with the pending EU General Data Protection Regulation and how data transfers to and from the United Kingdom will be regulated. Brexit could also have the effect of disrupting the free movement of goods, services, and people between the United Kingdom, the European Union, and elsewhere. The full effect of Brexit is uncertain and depends on any agreements the United Kingdom may make to retain access to European Union markets. Consequently, no assurance can be given about the impact of the outcome and our business, including operational and tax policies, may be seriously harmed or require reassessment if our European operations or presence become a significant part of our business.

We plan to continue to make acquisitions and investments in privately held companies, which could require significant management attention, disrupt our business, dilute our stockholders, and seriously harm our business.

As part of our business strategy, we have made and intend to make acquisitions to add specialized employees and complementary companies, products, and technologies, as well as investments in privately held companies in furtherance of our strategic objectives. Our ability to acquire and successfully integrate larger or more complex companies, products, and technologies is unproven. In the future, we may not be able to find other suitable acquisition or investment candidates, and we may not be able to complete acquisitions or investments on favorable terms, if at all. Our previous and future acquisitions and investments may not achieve our goals, and any future acquisitions or investments we complete could be viewed negatively by users, advertisers, partners, or investors. In addition, if we fail to successfully close transactions or integrate new teams, or integrate the products and technologies associated with these acquisitions into our company, our business could be seriously harmed. Any integration process may require significant time and resources, and we may not be able to manage the process successfully. We may not successfully evaluate or use the acquired products, technology, and personnel, or accurately forecast the financial impact of an acquisition or investment transaction, including accounting charges. We may also incur unanticipated liabilities that we assume as a result of acquiring companies. We may have to pay cash, incur debt, or issue equity securities to pay for any acquisition or investment, any of which could seriously harm our business. Selling equity to finance any such acquisition or investment would also dilute our stockholders. Incurring debt would increase our fixed obligations and could also include covenants or other restrictions that would impede our ability to manage our operations.


In addition, on average, it has historically taken us approximately one year after the closing of an acquisition to finalize the purchase price allocation. Therefore, it is possible that our valuation of an acquisition may change and result in unanticipated write-offs or charges, impairment of our goodwill, or a material change to the fair value of the assets and liabilities associated with a particular acquisition, any of which could seriously harm our business.

Our acquisition and investment strategy may not succeed if we are unable to remain attractive to target companies or expeditiously close transactions. Issuing shares of Class A common stock to fund an acquisition or investment would cause economic dilution to existing stockholders but not voting dilution. If we develop a reputation for being a difficult acquirer or having an unfavorable work environment, or target companies view our non-voting Class A common stock unfavorably, we may be unable to consummate key acquisition transactions essential to our corporate strategy and our business may be seriously harmed.

If we default on our credit obligations, our operations may be interrupted and our business could be seriously harmed.

We have a Credit Facility that we may draw on to finance our operations, acquisitions, and other corporate purposes, such as funding our tax-withholding and remittance obligations in connection with settling RSUs. If we default on these credit obligations, our lenders may:

require repayment of any outstanding amounts drawn on our Credit Facility;

terminate our Credit Facility; or

require us to pay significant damages.

If any of these events occur, our operations may be interrupted and our ability to fund our operations or obligations, as well as our business, could be seriously harmed. In addition, our Credit Facility contains operating covenants, including customary limitations on the incurrence of certain indebtedness and liens, restrictions on certain intercompany transactions, and limitations on the amount of dividends and stock repurchases. Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond our control, and breaches of these covenants could result in a default under the Credit Facility and any future financial agreements into which we may enter. If not waived, defaults could cause our outstanding indebtedness under our Credit Facility and any future financing agreements that we may enter into to become immediately due and payable. For more information on our Credit Facility, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

We may have exposure to greater-than-anticipated tax liabilities, which could seriously harm our business.

Our income tax obligations are based on our corporate operating structure and third-party and intercompany arrangements, including the manner in which we develop, value, and use our intellectual property and the valuations of our intercompany transactions. The tax laws applicable to our international business activities, including the laws of the United States and other jurisdictions, are subject to change and uncertain interpretation. The taxing authorities of the jurisdictions in which we operate may challenge our methodologies for valuing developed technology, intercompany arrangements, or transfer pricing, which could increase our worldwide effective tax rate and the amount of taxes we pay and seriously harm our business. Taxing authorities may also determine that the manner in which we operate our business is not consistent with how we report our income, which could increase our effective tax rate and the amount of taxes we pay and seriously harm our business. In addition, our future income taxes could fluctuate because of earnings being lower than anticipated in jurisdictions that have lower statutory tax rates and higher than anticipated in jurisdictions that have higher statutory tax rates, by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, or by changes in tax laws, regulations, or accounting principles. We are subject to regular review and audit by U.S. federal and state and foreign tax authorities. Any adverse outcome from a review or audit could seriously harm our business. In addition, determining our worldwide provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities requires significant judgment by management, and there are many transactions where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Although we believe that our estimates are reasonable, the ultimate tax outcome may differ from the amounts recorded in our financial statements for such period or periods and may seriously harm our business.


Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited, each of which could seriously harm our business.

As of December 31, 2017, we had U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $1.6 billion and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $930.2 million. Under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change net operating loss carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes, such as research tax credits, to offset its post-change income and taxes may be limited. In general, an “ownership change” occurs if there is a cumulative change in our ownership by “5% shareholders” that exceeds 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period. Similar rules may apply under state tax laws. In the event that it is determined that we have in the past experienced an ownership change, or if we experience one or more ownership changes as a result of future transactions in our stock, then we may be limited in our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and other tax assets to reduce taxes owed on the net taxable income that we earn. Any limitations on the ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and other tax assets could seriously harm our business.

Additionally, the Tax Act, which was enacted on December 22, 2017, significantly reforms the Code, including changes to the rules governing net operating loss carryforwards. For net operating loss carryforwards arising in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, the Tax Act limits a taxpayer’s ability to utilize such carryforwards to 80% of taxable income. In addition, net operating loss carryforwards arising in tax years ending after December 31, 2017 can be carried forward indefinitely, but carryback is generally prohibited. Net operating loss carryforwards generated by us before January 1, 2018 will not be subject to the taxable income limitation and will continue to have a twenty-year carryforward period. However, the changes in the carryforward and carryback periods as well as the new limitation on use of net operating losses may significantly impact our ability to use net operating loss carryforwards generated after December 31, 2017, as well as the timing of any such use, and could seriously harm our business.

If our goodwill or intangible assets become impaired, we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings, which could seriously harm our business.

Under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, we review our intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at least annually. As of December 31, 2017, we had recorded a total of $806.4 million of goodwill and intangible assets, net related to our acquisitions. An adverse change in market conditions, particularly if such change has the effect of changing one of our critical assumptions or estimates, could result in a change to the estimation of fair value that could result in an impairment charge to our goodwill or intangible assets. Any such material charges may seriously harm our business.

We cannot be certain that additional financing will be available on reasonable terms when needed, or at all, which could seriously harm our business.

We have incurred net losses and negative cash flow from operations for all prior periods, and we may not achieve or maintain profitability. As a result, we may need additional financing. Our ability to obtain additional financing, if and when required, will depend on investor demand, our operating performance, the condition of the capital markets, and other factors. To the extent we use available funds or draw on our Credit Facility, we may need to raise additional funds and we cannot assure investors that additional financing will be available to us on favorable terms when required, or at all. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity, equity-linked, or debt securities, those securities may have rights, preferences, or privileges senior to the rights of our Class A common stock, and our existing stockholders may experience dilution. In the event that we are unable to obtain additional financing on favorable terms, our interest expense and principal repayment requirements could increase significantly, which could seriously harm our business.

Payment transactions using Snapcash or future products may subject us to additional regulatory requirements and other risks that could be costly and difficult to comply with and could seriously harm our business.

Our users can use Snapchat to send cash to other users using our Snapcash feature. Depending on how our Snapcash product evolves or whether we develop additional commerce products in the future, we may be subject to a variety of laws and regulations in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere, including those governing money transmission, gift cards, and other prepaid access instruments, electronic funds transfers, anti-money laundering, counter-terrorist financing, gambling, banking and lending, and import and export restrictions. Although we currently use the service of a third party to provide the Snapcash feature, these laws may apply to us in some jurisdictions. To increase flexibility in how our use of Snapcash may evolve and to mitigate regulatory uncertainty, we may be required to apply for certain money-transmitter licenses in the United States, which may generally require us to demonstrate compliance with many domestic laws in these areas. Our


efforts to comply with these laws and regulations could be costly and divert management’s time and effort and may still not guarantee compliance. If we are found to violate any of these legal or regulatory requirements, we may be subject to monetary fines or other penalties, such as a cease-and-desist order, or we may be required to make product changes, any of which could seriously harm our business. Moreover, the Snapcash product is not enabled on Snapchat by default, and our users must manually enable the feature within the application, which may prevent the Snapcash product from gaining traction with our users or becoming a material part of our business. We have not recognized revenue related to Snapcash to date.

In addition, we may be subject to a variety of additional risks as a result of Snapcash, including:

increased costs and diversion of management time and effort and other resources to deal with bad transactions or customer disputes;

potential fraudulent or otherwise illegal activity by users or third parties;

restrictions on the investment of consumer funds used to make Snapcash transactions; and

additional disclosure and reporting requirements.

If any of these risks occurs, our business may be seriously harmed.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Class A Common Stock

Holders of Class A common stock have no voting rights. As a result, holders of Class A common stock will not have any ability to influence stockholder decisions.

Class A common stockholders have no voting rights, unless required by Delaware law. As a result, all matters submitted to stockholders will be decided by the vote of holders of Class B common stock and Class C common stock. As of December 31, 2017,2019, Mr. Spiegel and Mr. Murphy control approximately 95.2%99% of our voting power, and potentially either one of themMr. Spiegel alone may exercise voting control over our outstanding capital stock. If Mr. Spiegel and Mr. Murphy vote together, or if Mr. Spiegel acts alone, they will have the ability to control the outcome ofover all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval. In addition, because our Class A common stock carries no voting rights (except as required by Delaware law), the issuance of the Class A common stock in future offerings, in future stock-based acquisition transactions, or to fund employee equity incentive programs could prolong the duration of Mr. Spiegel’s and Mr. Murphy’s current relative ownership of our voting power and their ability to elect certain directors and to determine the outcome of all matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders. This concentrated control eliminates other stockholders’ ability to influence corporate matters and, as a result, we may take actions that our stockholders do not view as beneficial. As a result, the market price of our Class A common stock could be adversely affected.

We cannot predict the impact our capital structure and the concentrated control by our founders may have on our stock price or our business.

Although other U.S.-based companies have publicly traded classes of non-voting stock, to our knowledge, no other publicwe were the first company has listedto only list non-voting stock on a U.S. stock exchange. We cannot predict whether this structure, combined with the concentrated control by Mr. Spiegel and Mr. Murphy, will result in a lower trading price or greater fluctuations in the trading price of our Class A common stock, or will result in adverse publicity or other adverse consequences. In addition, some indexes are considering whether tohave indicated they will exclude non-voting stock, like our Class A common stock, from their membership. For example, in July 2017, FTSE Russell, a provider of widely followed stock indexes, stated that it plans to requirenow requires new constituents of its indexes to have at least five percent of their voting rights in the hands of public stockholders. In addition, in July 2017, S&P Dow Jones, another provider of widely followed stock indexes, has stated that companies with multiple share classes will not be eligible for certain of their indexes. As a result, our Class A common stock willis likely not be eligible for these stock indexes. We cannot assure you that other stock indexes will not take a similar approach to FTSE Russell or S&P Dow Jones in the future. Exclusion from indexes could make our Class A common stock less attractive to investors and, as a result, the market price of our Class A common stock could be adversely affected.

Because our Class A common stock is non-voting, we and our stockholders are exempt from certain provisions of U.S. securities laws. This may limit the information available to holders of our Class A common stock.

Because our Class A common stock is non-voting, significant holders of our common stock are exempt from the obligation to file reports under Sections 13(d), 13(g), and 16 of the Exchange Act. These provisions generally require periodic reporting of beneficial ownership by significant stockholders, including changes in that ownership. For example, in November 2017, Tencent Holdings Limited notified us that it, together with its affiliates, acquired 145,778,246 shares of our


non-voting Class A common stock via open market purchases. As a result of our capital structure, neither we nor Tencent and Snap are notis obligated to disclose changes in Tencent’s ownership of our Class A common stock, so there can be no assurance that you, or we, will be notified of any such changes. Our directors and officers are required to file reports under Section 16 of the Exchange Act. Our significant stockholders, other than directors and officers, are exempt from the “short-swing” profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and related rules with respect to their purchases and sales of our


securities. As such, stockholders will be unable to bring derivative claims for disgorgement of profits for trades by significant stockholders under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act unless the significant stockholders are also directors or officers.

Since our Class A common stock is our only class of stock registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act and that class is non-voting, we are not required to file proxy statements or information statements under Section 14 of the Exchange Act, unless a vote of the Class A common stock is required by applicable law. Accordingly, legal causes of action and remedies under Section 14 of the Exchange Act for inadequate or misleading information in proxy statements may not be available to holders of our Class A common stock. If we do not deliver any proxy statements, information statements, annual reports, and other information and reports to the holders of our Class B common stock and Class C common stock, then we will similarly not provide any of this information to holders of our Class A common stock. Because we are not required to file proxy statements or information statements under Section 14 of the Exchange Act, any proxy statement, information statement, or notice of our annual meeting may not include all information under Section 14 of the Exchange Act that a public company with voting securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act would be required to provide to its stockholders. Most of that information, however, will be reported in other public filings. For example, any disclosures required by Part III of Form 10-K as well as disclosures required by the NYSE for the year ended December 31, 20172019 that are customarily included in a proxy statement are instead included in this Form 10-K,Annual Report, rather than a proxy statement. But some information required in a proxy statement or information statement is not required in any other public filing. For example, we will not be required to comply with the proxy access rules under Section 14 of the Exchange Act. If we take any action in an extraordinary meeting of stockholders where the holders of Class A common stock are not entitled to vote, we will not be required to provide the information required under Section 14 of the Exchange Act. Nor will we be required to file a preliminary proxy statement under Section 14 of the Exchange Act. Since that information is also not required in a Form 10-K, holders of Class A common stock may not receive the information required under Section 14 of the Exchange Act with respect to extraordinary meetings of stockholders. In addition, we are not subject to the “say-on-pay” and “say-on-frequency” provisions of the Dodd–Frank Act. As a result, our stockholders do not have an opportunity to provide a non-binding vote on the compensation of our executive officers. Moreover, holders of our Class A common stock will be unable to bring matters before our annual meeting of stockholders or nominate directors at such meeting, nor can they submit stockholder proposals under Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act.

The trading price of our Class A common stock has been and will likely continue to be volatile.

The trading price of our Class A common stock has been and is likely to continue to be volatile. Shares of Class A common stock were sold in our IPO in March 2017 at a price of $17.00 per share. Since then, the trading price of our Class A common stock has ranged from $11.28$4.82 to $29.44 through December 31, 2017.2019. For example, as of December 31, 2018, the trading price of our Class A common stock had declined 68% since our IPO in March 2017 but as of December 31, 2019, the trading price of our Class A common stock had increased 196% compared to the trading price on December 31, 2018. Declines or volatility in our trading price could make it more difficult to attract and retain talent, adversely impact employee retention and morale, and may require us to issue more equity to incentivize employees which could dilute stockholders. The market price of our Class A common stock may fluctuate or decline significantly in response to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:

actual or anticipated fluctuations in our user growth, retention, engagement, revenue, or other operating results;

variations between our actual operating results and the expectations of securities analysts, investors, and the financial community;

our plans to not provide financial guidance or projections, which may increase the probability that our financial results are perceived as not in line with analysts’ expectations;

any forward-looking financial or operating information we may provide to the public or securities analysts, any changes in this information, or our failure to meet expectations based on this information;

actions of securities analysts who initiate or maintain coverage of us, changes in financial estimates by any securities analysts who follow our company, or our failure to meet these estimates or the expectations of investors;

whether investors or analysts view our capital structure unfavorably, particularly our non-voting Class A common stock and the significant voting control of our co-founders;

additional shares of our common stock being sold into the market by us or our existing stockholders, or the anticipation of such sales, including if we issue shares to satisfy RSU-related tax obligations;


actual or anticipated fluctuations in our user growth, retention, engagement, revenue, or other operating results;

 

variations between our actual operating results and the expectations of investors and the financial community;

the accuracy of our financial guidance or projections;

any forward-looking financial or operating information we may provide, any changes in this information, or our failure to meet expectations based on this information;

actions of investors who initiate or maintain coverage of us, changes in financial estimates by any investors who follow our company, or our failure to meet these estimates or the expectations of investors;

whether our capital structure is viewed unfavorably, particularly our non-voting Class A common stock and the significant voting control of our co-founders;

additional shares of our common stock being sold into the market by us or our existing stockholders, or the anticipation of such sales, including if we issue shares to satisfy equity-related tax obligations;

announcements by us or our competitors of significant products or features, technical innovations, acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures, or capital commitments;

announcements by us or estimates by third parties of actual or anticipated changes in the size of our user base or the level of user engagement;


changes in operating performance and stock market valuations of technology companies in our industry, including our partners and competitors;

announcements by us or estimates by third parties of actual or anticipated changes in the size of our user base or the level of user engagement;

price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market, including as a result of trends in the economy as a whole;

changes in operating performance and stock market valuations of technology companies in our industry segment, including our partners and competitors;

lawsuits threatened or filed against us;

price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market, including as a result of trends in the economy as a whole;

developments in new legislation and pending lawsuits or regulatory actions, including interim or final rulings by judicial or regulatory bodies; and

lawsuits threatened or filed against us;

developments in new legislation and pending lawsuits or regulatory actions, including interim or final rulings by judicial or regulatory bodies; and

other events or factors, including those resulting from war or incidents of terrorism, or responses to these events.

other events or factors, including those resulting from war or incidents of terrorism, or responses to these events.

In addition, extreme price and volume fluctuations in the stock markets have affected and continue to affect many technology companies’ stock prices.prices, including us. Often, their stock prices have fluctuated in ways unrelated or disproportionate to the companies’ operating performance. In the past, stockholders have filed securities class-action litigation following periods of market volatility. Beginning on May 16, 2017, we, certain of our officers and directors, and the underwriters for our IPO were named as defendants in securities class actions purportedly brought on behalf of purchasers of our Class A common stock. ThisIn January 2020, we entered into a preliminary agreement to settle the federal and state securities class actions. Any litigation could subject us to substantial costs, divert resources and the attention of management from our business, and seriously harm our business.

Conversion of the Convertible Notes may dilute the ownership interest of our stockholders or may otherwise depress the market price of our Class A common stock.

The conversion of some or all of the Convertible Notes may dilute the ownership interests of our stockholders. On conversion of the Convertible Notes, we have the option to pay or deliver, as the case may be, cash, shares of our Class A common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of our Class A common stock. If we elect to settle our conversion obligation in shares of our Class A common stock or a combination of cash and shares of our Class A common stock, any sales in the public market of our Class A common stock issuable on such conversion could adversely affect prevailing market prices of our Class A common stock. In addition, the existence of the Convertible Notes may encourage short selling by market participants because the conversion of the Convertible Notes could be used to satisfy short positions, or anticipated conversion of the Convertible Notes into shares of our Class A common stock, any of which could depress the market price of our Class A common stock.

We may still incur substantially more debt or take other actions that would diminish our ability to make payments on the Convertible Notes when due.

We and our subsidiaries may incur substantial additional debt in the future, subject to the restrictions contained in our current and future debt instruments. We are not restricted under the terms of the Indenture governing the Convertible Notes from incurring additional debt, securing existing or future debt, repurchasing our stock, making investments, paying dividends, recapitalizing our debt, or taking a number of other actions that could have the effect of diminishing our ability to make payments on the Convertible Notes when due.

The conditional conversion feature of the Convertible Notes, if triggered, may adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

In the event the conditions for optional conversion of the Convertible Notes by holders are met before the close of business on the business day immediately preceding May 1, 2026, holders of the Convertible Notes will be entitled to convert the Convertible Notes at any time during specified periods at their option. If one or more holders elect to convert their Convertible Notes, unless we elect to satisfy our conversion obligation by delivering solely shares of our Class A common stock (other than paying cash in lieu of delivering any fractional share), we may settle all or a portion of our conversion obligation in cash, which could adversely affect our liquidity. In addition, even if holders do not elect to convert their Convertible Notes, we could be required under applicable accounting rules to reclassify all or a portion of the outstanding principal of the Convertible Notes as a current rather than long-term liability, which would result in a material reduction of our net working capital and may seriously harm our business.


We entered into certain hedging positions that may affect the value of the Convertible Notes and the volatility and value of our Class A common stock.

In connection with the issuance of the Convertible Notes, we entered into certain hedging positions with certain financial institutions. These hedging positions are expected generally to reduce potential dilution of our Class A common stock on any conversion of the Convertible Notes or offset any cash payments we are required to make in excess of the principal amount of such converted Convertible Notes, as the case may be, with such reduction or offset subject to a cap.

The counterparties to these hedging positions or their respective affiliates may modify their hedge positions by entering into or unwinding various derivatives with respect to our Class A common stock or purchasing or selling our Class A common stock in secondary market transactions prior to the maturity of the Convertible Notes (and are likely to do so during any observation period related to a conversion of Convertible Notes or following any repurchase of Convertible Notes by us on any fundamental change repurchase date or otherwise). This activity could cause or avoid an increase or a decrease in the market price of our Class A common stock or the Convertible Notes. In addition, if any such hedging positions fail to become effective, the counterparties to these hedging positions or their respective affiliates may unwind their hedge positions, which could adversely affect the value of our Class A common stock.

Delaware law and provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, as well as our Indenture, could make a merger, tender offer, or proxy contest difficult or more expensive, thereby depressing the trading price of our Class A common stock.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that could depress the trading price of our Class A common stock by acting to discourage, delay, or prevent a change of control of our company or changes in our management that the stockholders of our company may deem advantageous. These provisions include the following:

our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides for a tri-class capital structure. As a result of this structure, Mr. Spiegel and Mr. Murphy control all stockholder decisions. As a result of Mr. Spiegel’s RSU award, Mr. Spiegel alone may exercise voting control over our outstanding capital stock. If they vote together, they will have control over all stockholder matters. This includes the election of directors and significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale of our company or our assets. This concentrated control could discourage others from initiating any potential merger, takeover, or other change-of-control transaction that other stockholders may view as beneficial. As noted above, the issuance of the Class A common stock dividend, and any future issuances of Class A common stock dividends, could have the effect of prolonging the influence of Mr. Spiegel and Mr. Murphy on the company;

our certificate of incorporation provides for a tri-class capital structure. As a result of this structure, Mr. Spiegel and Mr. Murphy control all stockholder decisions. Mr. Spiegel alone may exercise voting control over our outstanding capital stock. This includes the election of directors and significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale of our company or our assets. This concentrated control could discourage others from initiating any potential merger, takeover, or other change-of-control transaction that other stockholders may view as beneficial. As noted above, the issuance of the Class A common stock dividend, and any future issuances of Class A common stock dividends, could have the effect of prolonging the influence of Mr. Spiegel and Mr. Murphy on the company;

our board of directors has the right to elect directors to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of the board of directors or the resignation, death, or removal of a director, which prevents stockholders from being able to fill vacancies on our board of directors;

our board of directors has the right to elect directors to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of the board of directors or the resignation, death, or removal of a director, which prevents stockholders from being able to fill vacancies on our board of directors;

our amended and restated certificate of incorporation prohibits cumulative voting in the election of directors. This limits the ability of minority stockholders to elect director candidates; and

our certificate of incorporation prohibits cumulative voting in the election of directors. This limits the ability of minority stockholders to elect directors; and

our board of directors may issue, without stockholder approval, shares of undesignated preferred stock. The ability to issue undesignated preferred stock makes it possible for our board of directors to issue preferred stock with voting or other rights or preferences that could impede the success of any attempt to acquire us.

our board of directors may issue, without stockholder approval, shares of undesignated preferred stock. The ability to issue undesignated preferred stock makes it possible for our board of directors to issue preferred stock with voting or other rights or preferences that could impede the success of any attempt to acquire us.

Any provision of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, amended and restated bylaws, or Delaware law that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock, and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our Class A common stock.

Furthermore, certain provisions in the Indenture governing our Convertible Notes may make it more difficult or expensive for a third party to acquire us. For example, the Indenture requires us, at the holders’ election, to repurchase the Convertible Notes for cash on the occurrence of a fundamental change and, in certain circumstances, to increase the conversion rate for a holder that converts its Convertible Notes in connection with a make-whole fundamental change. A takeover of us may trigger the requirement that we repurchase the Convertible Notes or increase the conversion rate, which could make it more costly for a third party to acquire us. The Indenture also prohibits us from engaging in a merger or acquisition unless, among other things, the surviving entity assumes our obligations under the Convertible Notes and the Indenture. These and other provisions in the Indenture could deter or prevent a third party from acquiring us even when the acquisition may be favorable to holders of the Convertible Notes or our stockholders.


An active trading market for our Class A common stock may not be sustained.

Our Class A common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “SNAP.” However, we cannot assure you that an active trading market for our Class A common stock will be sustained or maintained. In addition, we cannot assure you that the liquidity of any trading market will provide stockholders the ability to sell shares of our Class A common stock when or at prices that they desire.

Future sales of shares by existing stockholders could cause our stock price to decline.

If our existing stockholders, including employees and service providers who obtain equity, sell, or indicate an intention to sell, substantial amounts of our Class A common stock in the public market, the trading price of our Class A common stock could decline. As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had outstanding a total of 883.0 million1.2 billion shares of Class A common stock, 122.624.5 million shares of Class B common stock, and 216.6231.1 million shares of Class C common stock. In addition, as of December 31, 2017, 180.32019, 149.3 million shares of Class A common stock, 21.01.6 million shares of Class B common stock, and 34.39.4 million shares of Class C common stock were subject to outstanding stock options and RSUs. All of our outstanding shares other thanare eligible for sale in the public market, except approximately 50 million shares of Class A common stock issued in our IPO which are subject to one-year lock-up agreements with us, and 498.6415.5 million shares (including options exercisable and RSAs subject to forfeiture as of December 31, 2017)2019) held by directors, executive officers, and other affiliates that are subject to volume limitations under Rule 144 of the Securities Act are eligible for sale in the public market.Act. Our employees, other service providers, and directors are subject to our quarterly trading window closures.

The In addition, we have reserved shares subject to outstanding stock options and RSUs will become eligible for sale in the public market to the extent permitted by the provisions of various vesting agreements and subject to Rule 144 limitations applicable to affiliates. We filed a registration statement on Form S-8 under the Securities Act covering all the shares of Class A common stock subject to outstanding stock options or otherwise reserved for issuance under our equity incentive plans, as well as shares of Class A common stock issuable on conversion of Class B common stock. Shares covered by the Form S-8 registration statement are eligible for sale in the public markets, subject to Rule 144 limitations applicable to affiliates. Ifplans. When these additional shares are issued and subsequently sold, or if it is perceived that they willwould be sold in the public market,dilutive to existing stockholders and the trading price of our Class A common stock could decline.

If securities or industry analysts either do not publish research about us, or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about us, our business, or our market, or if they change their recommendations regarding our common stock adversely, the trading price or trading volume of our Class A common stock could decline.

The trading market for our Class A common stock is influenced in part by the research and reports that securities or industry analysts may publish about us, our business, our market, or our competitors. If one or more of the analysts initiate research with an unfavorable rating or downgrade our Class A common stock, provide a more favorable recommendation about our competitors, or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our Class A common stock price would likely decline. If any analyst who may cover us were to cease coverage of us or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause the trading price or trading volume to decline. Since we do not provide only limited financial guidance, or projections, this may increase the probability that our financial results are perceived as not in line with analysts’ expectations, and could cause volatility to our Class A common stock price.

We are an emerging growth company, and any decision on our part to comply only with certain reduced reporting and disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies could make our Class A common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an emerging growth company, and, for as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we may choose to take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies but not to “emerging growth companies,” including:

not being required to have our independent registered public accounting firm audit our internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;

reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and annual report on Form 10-K; and

exemptions from the requirements of holding nonbinding advisory votes on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.


We can continue to be an emerging growth company, as defined in the JOBS Act, for up to five years following our IPO. We do not currently expect to continue to be an emerging growth company for five years and, therefore, do not expect to be able to take advantage of these various exemptions. However, so long as our Class A common stock remains both non-voting and our only publicly traded class of stock, we will not be subject to the requirements of holding nonbinding advisory votes on executive compensation and any golden parachute payments because we would not be subject to the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or the Dodd-Frank Act, mandating advisory votes.

We cannot predict if investors will find our Class A common stock less attractive if we choose to rely on any of the exemptions afforded emerging growth companies. If some investors find our Class A common stock less attractive because we rely on any of these exemptions, there may be a less active trading market for our Class A common stock and the market price of our Class A common stock may be more volatile.

Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can also delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have irrevocably elected not to avail ourselves of this accommodation allowing for delayed adoption of new or revised accounting standards, and therefore, we will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.

We do not intend to pay cash dividends for the foreseeable future.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings to finance the operation and expansion of our business, and we do not expect to declare or pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. As a result, you may only receive a return on your investment in our Class A common stock if the market price of our Class A common stock increases. In addition, our Credit Facility includes restrictions on our ability to pay cash dividends.

We have previously identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, and ifIf we are unable to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, and the market price of our Class A common stock may be seriously harmed.

We are required to maintain internal control over financial reporting, and to report any material weaknesses in those internal controls, subject to any exemptions that we avail ourselves to under the JOBS Act. For example, in 2018 we are required to perform system and process evaluation and testing of ourthose internal control over financial reportingcontrols to allow management to report on their effectiveness, report any material weaknesses in such internal controls, and obtain an opinion from our independent registered public accounting firm regarding the effectiveness of oursuch internal control over financial reporting,controls as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. WeAct, all of which is time-consuming, costly, and complicated. If we are unable to comply with these requirements in the process of designing, implementing, and testinga timely manner, if we assert that our internal control over financial reporting required to comply with this obligation. That process is time-consuming, costly, and complicated.

We and our prior independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, identifiedineffective, if we identify material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, for the year ended December 31, 2014, related to the lack of sufficient qualified accounting personnel, which led to incorrect application of generally accepted accounting principles, insufficiently designed segregation of duties, and insufficiently designed controls over business processes, including the financial statement close and reporting processes with respect to the development of accounting policies, procedures, and estimates. After these material weaknesses were identified, management implemented a remediation plan that included hiring key accounting personnel, creating a formal month-end close process, and establishing more robust processes supporting internal controls over financial reporting, including accounting policies, procedures, and estimates. As of December 31, 2015, we have implemented controls sufficient to remediate the material weaknesses. Our remediation efforts are complete and we did not incur any material costs.

If we identify future material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, if we are unable to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in a timely manner or assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion or expresses a qualified or adverse opinion about the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports and the market price of our Class A common stock could be negatively affected. In addition, we could become subject to investigations by the stock exchange on which our securities are listed,NYSE, the SEC, and other regulatory authorities, which could require additional financial and management resources.


The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources, result in more litigation, and divert management’s attention.

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, the listing requirements of the NYSE, and other applicable securities rules and regulations. Complying with these rules and regulations have caused and will increase ourcontinue to cause us to incur additional legal and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, be time-consuming or costly, and continue to increase demand on our systems and resources. The Exchange Act requires, among other things, that we file annual, quarterly, and current reports with respect to our business and operating results.results, and that our independent registered public accounting firm provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

By complying with public disclosure requirements, our business and financial condition are more visible, which we believe may result in increased threatened or actual litigation, including by competitors and other third parties. For example, beginning on May 16, 2017, we, certain of our officers and directors, and the underwriters of our IPO were named as defendants in securities class actions purportedly brought on behalf of purchasers of our Class A common stock. In January 2020, we entered into a preliminary agreement to settle the federal and state securities class actions. Shareholder litigation can subject us to substantial costs and divert resources and the attention of management from our business. If those claims are successful, our business could be seriously harmed. Even if the claims do not result in litigation or are resolved in our favor, the time and resources needed to resolve them could divert our management’s resources, impose large defense costs, and seriously harm our business.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware and the federal district courts of the United States of America will be the exclusive forums for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or employees.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the exclusive forum for:

any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf;

any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf;

any action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty;

any action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty;

any action asserting a claim against us arising under the Delaware General Corporation Law, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, or our amended and restated bylaws; and

any action asserting a claim against us arising under the Delaware General Corporation Law, our certificate of incorporation, or our bylaws; and

any action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the internal-affairs doctrine.

This exclusive-forum provision, if permitted by the internal-affairs doctrine.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation further provides that the federal district courts of the United States of America will be the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act.

These exclusive-forum provisionsapplicable law, may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or other employees, which may discourage lawsuits against us and our directors, officers, and other employees. If a court were to find either exclusive-forum provision in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving the dispute in other jurisdictions, which could seriously harm our business.

Our certificate of incorporation further provides that the federal district courts of the United States of America will be the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. Recently, the Delaware Chancery Court issued an opinion invalidating such provision. In light of that recent decision, we will not attempt to enforce this provision of our certificate of incorporation to the extent it is not permitted by applicable law. As a result, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving disputes that would otherwise by restricted by that provision in other jurisdictions, which could seriously harm our business.


Item 1B. Unresolved Staff CommentsComments.

None.

Item 2. Properties.

Our corporate headquarters are located in and around Venice,Santa Monica, California, where we holdoccupy approximately 690,000544,000 square feet, across several locations.including some remaining Venice locations and excluding leases we have ceased use primarily as a result of moving to a centralized corporate office. As of December 31, 2017,2019, our global facilities totaled an aggregate of approximately 1,144,0001.1 million square feet of office space of which about 1,135,500 was leased and 8,500 was owned. For approximately 77,000 square feet of our leased office space, we have assets recorded as buildings, as well as a corresponding long-term liability for our build-to-suit lease agreements where we are considered the deemed owner of these buildings, for accounting purposes.space. We also maintain offices in multiple locations in the United States and internationally in Europe, Asia, and Australia. We expect tomay add additional offices as we increase our headcount and expand our business to other continents and countries. We believe that our facilities are sufficient for our current needs and that, should it be needed, additional facilities will be available to accommodate the expansion of our business.


We are currently involved in, and may in the future be involved in, legal proceedings, claims, inquiries, and investigations in the ordinary course of our business, including claims for infringing intellectual property rights related to our products and the content contributed by our users and partners. Although the results of these proceedings, claims, inquiries, and investigations cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that the final outcome of these matters is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations. Regardless of final outcomes, however, any such proceedings, claims, and investigations may nonetheless impose a significant burden on management and employees and may come with costly defense costs or unfavorable preliminary and interim rulings.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.


PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information for Common Stock

Our Class A common stock has been listed on the NYSE under the symbol “SNAP” since March 2, 2017. Prior to that time, there was no public market for our stock. The following table sets forth for the indicated periods the high and low intra-day sales prices per share for our Class A common stock on the NYSE.

 

 

High

 

 

Low

 

First Quarter 2017 (from March 2, 2017)

 

$

29.44

 

 

$

18.90

 

Second Quarter 2017

 

 

23.57

 

 

 

17.00

 

Third Quarter 2017

 

 

17.92

 

 

 

11.28

 

Fourth Quarter 2017

 

16.88

 

 

12.10

 

Our Class B common stock and Class C common stock are not listed noror traded on any stock exchange.

Holders of Record

As of December 31, 2017,2019, there were 415571 stockholders of record of our Class A common stock, not includingstock. Because many of our shares of our Class A common stock are held by brokers.brokers and other institutions on behalf of stockholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of stockholders represented by these record holders. The closing price of our Class A common stock on December 31, 2019 was $14.61 $16.33 per share as reported on the NYSE. As of December 31, 2017,2019, there were 219100 stockholders of record of our Class B common stock and two stockholders of record of our Class C common stock.

Dividend Policy

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We intend to retain all available funds and future earnings, if any, to fund the development and expansion of our business, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The terms of our Credit Facility also restrict our ability to pay dividends, and we may also enter into credit agreements or other borrowing arrangements in the future that will restrict our ability to declare or pay cash dividends on our capital stock.

We have paid a stock dividend of our Class A common stock on our capital stock in the past and from time to time in the future may pay special or regular stock dividends in the form of Class A common stock, which per the terms of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation must be paid equally to all stockholders. Any future determination regarding the declaration and payment of dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on then-existing conditions, including our financial condition, operating results, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects, and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.


Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

We had no repurchases of equity securities for the three months ended December 31, 2017.

Recent Sale of Unregistered Securities and Use of Proceeds

Recent Sale of Unregistered Securities

During the three months ended December 31, 2017, we issued or agreed to issue a total of 117,432 shares of our Class A common stock as partial consideration to the stockholders of an entity we acquired in December 2017, all in private transactions exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(2) or Regulation D under the Securities Act.

Use of Proceeds

On March 1, 2017, our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-215866) was declared effective by the SEC for our initial public offering of Class A common stock, pursuant to which we sold an aggregate of 160,349,765 shares of our Class A common stock at an initial public offering price of $17.00 per share. There has been no material change in the planned use of proceeds from our initial public offering as described in our Prospectus.None.

Stock Performance Graph

This performance graph shall not be deemed “filed” with the SEC for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or incorporated by reference into any filing of Snap Inc. under the Securities Act.

The following graph shows a comparison from March 2, 2017 (the date our Class A common stock commenced trading on the NYSE) through December 31, 20172019 of the cumulative total return for our Class A common stock, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index (S&P 500 Index), and the NYSE Composite. The graph assumes that $100 was invested at the market close on March 2, 2017 in our Class A common stock, the S&P 500 Index, and the NYSE Composite, and data for the S&P 500 Index and the NYSE Composite assumes reinvestment of any dividends. The stock price performance of the following graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

 

 


Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

The consolidated statements of operations data for each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, and 20152017 and the consolidated balance sheets data as of December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included in “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 and the consolidated balance sheets data as of December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements, except as otherwise noted, that are not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of our results in any future period. You should read the following selected consolidated financial data together with “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The selected consolidated financial data in this section are not intended to replace our consolidated financial statements and the related notes.

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

824,949

 

 

$

404,482

 

 

$

58,663

 

 

$

1,715,534

 

 

$

1,180,446

 

 

$

824,949

 

 

$

404,482

 

 

$

58,663

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of revenue

 

 

717,462

 

 

 

451,660

 

 

 

182,341

 

 

 

895,838

 

 

 

798,865

 

 

 

717,462

 

 

 

451,660

 

 

 

182,341

 

Research and development

 

 

1,534,863

 

 

 

183,676

 

 

 

82,235

 

 

 

883,509

 

 

 

772,185

 

 

 

1,534,863

 

 

 

183,676

 

 

 

82,235

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

522,605

 

 

 

124,371

 

 

 

27,216

 

 

 

458,598

 

 

 

400,824

 

 

 

522,605

 

 

 

124,371

 

 

 

27,216

 

General and administrative

 

 

1,535,595

 

 

 

165,160

 

 

 

148,600

 

 

 

580,917

 

 

 

477,022

 

 

 

1,535,595

 

 

 

165,160

 

 

 

148,600

 

Total costs and expenses

 

 

4,310,525

 

 

 

924,867

 

 

 

440,392

 

 

 

2,818,862

 

 

 

2,448,896

 

 

 

4,310,525

 

 

 

924,867

 

 

 

440,392

 

Loss from operations

 

 

(3,485,576

)

 

 

(520,385

)

 

 

(381,729

)

Operating loss

 

 

(1,103,328

)

 

 

(1,268,450

)

 

 

(3,485,576

)

 

 

(520,385

)

 

 

(381,729

)

Interest income

 

 

21,096

 

 

 

4,654

 

 

 

1,399

 

 

 

36,042

 

 

 

27,228

 

 

 

21,096

 

 

 

4,654

 

 

 

1,399

 

Interest expense

 

 

(3,456

)

 

 

(1,424

)

 

 

 

 

 

(24,994

)

 

 

(3,894

)

 

 

(3,456

)

 

 

(1,424

)

 

 

 

Other income (expense), net

 

 

4,528

 

 

 

(4,568

)

 

 

(152

)

 

 

59,013

 

 

 

(8,248

)

 

 

4,528

 

 

 

(4,568

)

 

 

(152

)

Loss before income taxes

 

 

(3,463,408

)

 

 

(521,723

)

 

 

(380,482

)

 

 

(1,033,267

)

 

 

(1,253,364

)

 

 

(3,463,408

)

 

 

(521,723

)

 

 

(380,482

)

Income tax benefit (expense)

 

 

18,342

 

 

 

7,080

 

 

 

7,589

 

 

 

(393

)

 

 

(2,547

)

 

 

18,342

 

 

 

7,080

 

 

 

7,589

 

Net loss

 

$

(3,445,066

)

 

$

(514,643

)

 

$

(372,893

)

 

$

(1,033,660

)

 

$

(1,255,911

)

 

$

(3,445,066

)

 

$

(514,643

)

 

$

(372,893

)

Net loss per share attributable to Class A, Class B, and Class C common stockholders(1):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

(2.95

)

 

$

(0.64

)

 

$

(0.51

)

 

$

(0.75

)

 

$

(0.97

)

 

$

(2.95

)

 

$

(0.64

)

 

$

(0.51

)

Diluted

 

$

(2.95

)

 

$

(0.64

)

 

$

(0.51

)

 

$

(0.75

)

 

$

(0.97

)

 

$

(2.95

)

 

$

(0.64

)

 

$

(0.51

)

Adjusted EBITDA(2)

 

$

(720,056

)

 

$

(459,243

)

 

$

(292,898

)

 

(1)

See Note 23 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements included in “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for a description of how we compute basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to Class A, Class B, and Class C common stockholders.

(2)

See “Selected Financial DataNon-GAAP Financial Measures” below for more information and for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net loss, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities

 

$

2,043,039

 

 

$

987,368

 

 

$

2,112,805

 

 

$

1,279,063

 

 

$

2,043,039

 

 

$

987,368

 

 

$

640,810

 

Working capital

 

 

2,020,538

 

 

 

1,023,241

 

 

 

2,144,311

 

 

 

1,383,237

 

 

 

2,020,538

 

 

 

1,023,241

 

 

 

536,306

 

Total assets

 

 

3,421,566

 

 

 

1,722,792

 

 

 

4,011,924

 

 

 

2,714,106

 

 

 

3,421,566

 

 

 

1,722,792

 

 

 

938,936

 

Total liabilities

 

 

429,239

 

 

 

203,878

 

 

 

1,752,011

 

 

 

403,107

 

 

 

429,239

 

 

 

203,878

 

 

 

174,791

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

7,634,825

 

 

 

2,728,823

 

 

 

9,205,256

 

 

 

8,220,417

 

 

 

7,634,825

 

 

 

2,728,823

 

 

 

1,467,355

 

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(4,656,667

)

 

 

(1,207,862

)

 

 

(6,945,930

)

 

 

(5,912,578

)

 

 

(4,656,667

)

 

 

(1,207,862

)

 

 

(693,219

)

Total stockholders' equity

 

 

2,992,327

 

 

 

1,518,914

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

2,259,913

 

 

 

2,310,999

 

 

 

2,992,327

 

 

 

1,518,914

 

 

 

764,145

 

 


Non-GAAP Financial Measures

To supplement our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP, we use certain non-GAAP financial measures, as described below, to understand and evaluate our core operating performance. These non-GAAP financial measures, which may be different than similarly titled measures used by other companies, are presented to enhance investors’ overall understanding of our financial performance and should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP.

We use the non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted EBITDA, which is defined as net income (loss); excluding interest income; interest expense; other income (expense), net; income tax benefit (expense); depreciation and amortization; and stock-based compensation expense and related payroll tax expense. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA helps identify underlying trends in our business that could otherwise be masked by the effect of the expenses that we exclude in Adjusted EBITDA.

We use the non-GAAP financial measure of Free Cash Flow, which is defined as net cash used inprovided by (used in) operating activities, reduced by purchases of property and equipment. We believe Free Cash Flow is an important liquidity measure of the cash that is available, after capital expenditures, for operational expenses and investment in our business and is a key financial indicator used by management. Additionally, we believe that Free Cash Flow is an important measure since we use third-party infrastructure partners to host our services and therefore we do not incur significant capital expenditures to support revenue generating activities. Free Cash Flow is useful to investors as a liquidity measure because it measures our ability to generate or use cash. Once our business needs and obligations are met, cash can be used to maintain a strong balance sheet and invest in future growth.

We use the non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted EBITDA, which is defined as net income (loss); excluding interest income; interest expense; other income (expense), net; income tax benefit (expense); depreciation and amortization; stock-based compensation expense and related payroll tax expense, and certain other non-cash or non-recurring items impacting net income (loss) from time to time. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA helps identify underlying trends in our business that could otherwise be masked by the effect of the expenses that we exclude in Adjusted EBITDA.

We believe that both Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow and Adjusted EBITDA provide useful information about our financial performance, enhance the overall understanding of our past performance and future prospects, and allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by our management for financial and operational decision-making. We are presenting the non-GAAP measures of Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow and Adjusted EBITDA to assist investors in seeing our financial performance through the eyes of management, and because we believe that these measures provide an additional tool for investors to use in comparing our core financial performance over multiple periods with other companies in our industry.

These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation from, or as substitutes for, financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. There are a number of limitations related to the use of these non-GAAP financial measures compared to the closest comparable GAAP measure. Some of these limitations are that:

Adjusted EBITDA excludes certain recurring, non-cash charges such as depreciation of fixed assets and amortization of acquired intangible assets and, although these are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced in the future;

Adjusted EBITDA excludes stock-based compensation expense and related payroll tax expense, which have been, and will continue to be for the foreseeable future, significant recurring expenses in our business and an important part of our compensation strategy;

Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect tax payments that reduce cash available to us; and

Free Cash Flow does not reflect our future contractual commitments.


The following table presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net loss, the most comparable GAAP financial measure, for each of the periods presented:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Adjusted EBITDA reconciliation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

 

(3,445,066

)

 

 

(514,643

)

 

 

(372,893

)

Add (deduct):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

 

(21,096

)

 

 

(4,654

)

 

 

(1,399

)

Interest expense

 

 

3,456

 

 

 

1,424

 

 

 

 

Other (income) expense, net

 

 

(4,528

)

 

 

4,568

 

 

 

152

 

Income tax (benefit) expense

 

 

(18,342

)

 

 

(7,080

)

 

 

(7,589

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

61,288

 

 

 

29,115

 

 

 

15,307

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

2,639,895

 

 

 

31,842

 

 

 

73,524

 

Payroll tax expense related to stock-based compensation

 

 

24,470

 

 

 

185

 

 

 

 

Spectacles inventory-related charges(1)

 

 

39,867

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

(720,056

)

 

$

(459,243

)

 

$

(292,898

)

 

Free Cash Flow does not reflect our future contractual commitments;

(1)

Spectacles inventory-related

Adjusted EBITDA excludes certain recurring, non-cash charges were primarily relatedsuch as depreciation of fixed assets and amortization of acquired intangible assets and, although these are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized may have to excess inventory reserves and inventory purchase commitment cancellation chargesbe replaced in the third quarter of 2017. These charges are non-recurringfuture;

Adjusted EBITDA excludes stock-based compensation expense and not reflective of underlying trendsrelated payroll tax expense, which have been, and will continue to be for the foreseeable future, significant recurring expenses in our business.business and an important part of our compensation strategy; and

Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect tax payments that reduce cash available to us.

The following table presents a reconciliation of Free Cash Flow to net cash used in operating activities, the most comparable GAAP financial measure, for each of the periods presented:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Free Cash Flow reconciliation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

$

(734,667

)

 

$

(611,245

)

 

$

(306,622

)

 

$

(304,958

)

 

$

(689,924

)

 

$

(734,667

)

Less:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property and equipment

 

 

(84,518

)

 

 

(66,441

)

 

 

(19,205

)

 

 

(36,478

)

 

 

(120,242

)

 

 

(84,518

)

Free Cash Flow

 

$

(819,185

)

 

$

(677,686

)

 

$

(325,827

)

 

$

(341,436

)

 

$

(810,166

)

 

$

(819,185

)

 


The following table presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net loss, the most comparable GAAP financial measure, for each of the periods presented:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Adjusted EBITDA reconciliation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

 

(1,033,660

)

 

 

(1,255,911

)

 

 

(3,445,066

)

Add (deduct):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

 

(36,042

)

 

 

(27,228

)

 

 

(21,096

)

Interest expense

 

 

24,994

 

 

 

3,894

 

 

 

3,456

 

Other (income) expense, net

 

 

(59,013

)

 

 

8,248

 

 

 

(4,528

)

Income tax (benefit) expense

 

 

393

 

 

 

2,547

 

 

 

(18,342

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

87,245

 

 

 

91,648

 

 

 

61,288

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

686,013

 

 

 

538,211

 

 

 

2,639,895

 

Payroll tax expense related to stock-based compensation

 

 

27,840

 

 

 

21,927

 

 

 

24,470

 

Securities class actions legal charges

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lease exit charges

 

 

 

 

 

31,143

 

 

 

 

Reduction in force charges

 

 

 

 

 

9,884

 

 

 

 

Spectacles inventory-related charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39,867

 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

(202,230

)

 

$

(575,637

)

 

$

(720,056

)

Securities class actions legal charges in the fourth quarter of 2019 were related to a preliminary agreement to settle the securities class actions that arose following our IPO. The preliminary settlement agreement was signed in January 2020 and provided for a resolution of all of the pending claims in the stockholder class actions for $187.5 million. We recorded legal settlement expense, net of amounts directly covered by insurance, of $100.0 million. These charges are non-recurring and not reflective of underlying trends in our business.

We exited various operating leases prior to the end of the contractual lease term, primarily as a result of moving to a centralized corporate office located in Santa Monica, California. In the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded lease exit charges of $33.0 million. The charges primarily included the present value of our remaining lease obligation on the cease use dates that occurred during the quarter, net of estimated sublease income. As of December 31, 2018, we had exited all properties associated with this event. Changes to our estimated sublease income, including actual contracted sublease income, may result in incremental lease exit charge activity in the period determined. Additionally, we recognized a gain on the sale of buildings sold as a result of moving to our centralized corporate office, which is included in lease exit charges above for the year ended December 31, 2018. These charges are non-recurring and not reflective of underlying trends in our business.

Reduction in force charges in the first quarter of 2018 were related to a reduction in force plan impacting approximately 7% of our global headcount, primarily in engineering and sales. The charges are composed primarily of severance expense and related payroll tax expense. These charges are non-recurring and not reflective of underlying trends in our business. Additionally, we recognized a stock-based compensation forfeiture benefit of $31.5 million, which is included in stock-based compensation expense above for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Spectacles inventory-related charges were primarily related to excess inventory reserves and inventory purchase commitment cancellation charges in the third quarter of 2017. These charges are non-recurring and not reflective of underlying trends in our business.


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsOperations.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition to historical consolidated financial information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates, and beliefs that involve significant risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to those differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, particularly in “Risk Factors,” “Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” and “Note Regarding User Metrics and Other Data.”

Executive The following generally discusses 2019 and 2018 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2019 and 2018. Discussion of historical items and year-to-year comparisons between 2018 and 2017 that are not included in this discussion can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on February 6, 2019.

Overview of Full Year 20172019 Results

Our key user metrics and financial results for the fiscal year 20172019 are as follows:

User Metrics

Daily Active Users, or DAUs, were 187 million in the fourth quarter of 2017, compared to 158 million in the fourth quarter of 2016, an increase of 28.8 million or 18% year-over-year.

Daily Active Users, or DAUs, increased to 218 million in Q4 2019, compared to 186 million in Q4 2018.

Average revenue per user, or ARPU, was $1.53 in the fourth quarter of 2017, compared to $1.05 in the fourth quarter of 2016, an increase of 46% year-over-year.

Average revenue per user, or ARPU, increased 23% to $2.58 in Q4 2019, compared to $2.09 in Q4 2018.

Financial Results

Revenue was $824.9 million, an increase of 104% year-over-year.

Cash used in operating activities was $(305.0) million in 2019, compared to $(689.9) million in 2018.

Total costs and expenses were $4.3 billion, an increase of 84% year-over-year, excluding stock-based compensation expense and related payroll tax expense.

Free Cash Flow was $(341.4) million in 2019, compared to $(810.1) million in 2018.

Loss from operations was $3.5 billion.

Common shares outstanding plus shares underlying stock-based awards, including restricted stock units, restricted stock awards, and outstanding stock options, totaled 1,576 million at December 31, 2019, compared with 1,507 million one year ago.

Net loss was $3.4 billion with diluted loss per share of $(2.95).

Capital expenditures were $36.5 million in 2019, compared to $120.2 million in 2018.

Adjusted EBITDA was $(720.1) million.

Cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities were $2.1 billion as of December 31, 2019.

Cash used in operations was $734.7 million and Free Cash Flow was $(819.2) million.

Revenue increased 45% to $1.7 billion in 2019, compared to $1.2 billion in 2018.

Capital expenditures were $84.5 million.

Total costs and expenses excluding stock-based compensation and related payroll tax expense increased 11% to $2.1 billion in 2019, compared to $1.9 billion in 2018.

Net loss decreased 18% to $(1.0) billionin 2019, compared to $(1.3) billion in 2018.

Cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities were $2.0 billion as of December 31, 2017.

Diluted net loss per share decreased 23%to $(0.75) in 2019, compared to $(0.97)in 2018.

Adjusted EBITDA increased 65% to $(202.2) million in 2019, compared to $(575.6) million in 2018.

Overview

Snap Inc. is a camera company.

We believe that reinventing the camera represents our greatest opportunity to improve the way that people live and communicate. Our products empowerWe contribute to human progress by empowering people to express themselves, live in the moment, learn about the world, and have fun together.

Our flagship product, Snapchat, is a camera application that helps people communicate visually with friends and family through short videos and images called Snaps. On average, 187 million people use Snapchat daily and create over 3.5 billion Snaps every day.


Trends in User Metrics

User Engagement

We define a Daily Active User as a registered Snapchat user who opens the Snapchat application at least once during a defined 24-hour period. We measurecalculate average Daily Active Users for a particular quarter by calculatingadding the average Daily Active Users fornumber of DAUs on each day of that quarter and dividing that sum by the number of days in that quarter. We also breakDAUs are broken out Daily Active Users by geography because certain markets have a greater revenue opportunity and lower bandwidth costs. different characteristics. We had 187218 million DAUs on average acrossin the fourth quarter of 2017,2019, compared to 158 210 million in the prior quarter and 186 million in the fourth quarter of 2016, an increase of 18%.2018.

Quarterly Average Daily Active Users

(in millions)

 


 

 

(1)

North America includes Mexico, the Caribbean, and the Caribbean.Central America.

(2)

Europe includes Russia and Turkey.


Monetization

In the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded revenue of $1.7 billion compared to revenue of $1.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2018, an increase of 45% year-over-year. We monetize our business primarily through advertising. Our advertising products include Snap Ads and Sponsored Creative Tools like Sponsored Lenses and Sponsored Geofilters. While our advertising business is still in its early stages, it has grown rapidly. In the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded revenue of $824.9 million compared to revenue of $404.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, a 104% year-over-year increase.Tools.

We measure progress in our advertising business using ARPU because it helps us understand the rate at which we’re monetizing our daily user base. We define ARPU as quarterly revenue divided by the average Daily Active Users.

ARPU was $2.58 in the fourth quarter of 2019, up from $2.09 a year ago and $2.12 in the third quarter of 2019. For purposes of calculating ARPU, revenue by user geography is apportioned to each region based on a determination of the geographic location in which advertising impressions are delivered, as this approximates revenue based on user activity. This differs from the presentation of our revenue by geography in the notes to our consolidated financial statements, where revenue is based on the billing address of the advertising customer.


Quarterly Average Revenue per User

 

 

 

(1)

North America includes Mexico, the Caribbean, and the Caribbean.Central America.

(2)

Europe includes Russia and Turkey.

ARPU was $1.53 in the fourth quarter of 2017, up from $1.05 a year ago and $1.17 in the third quarter of 2017. In North America, ARPU was $2.75, 80% higher than our global average. We believe North America remains a leading indicator for the scale potential of our business.


Results of Operations

Components of Results of Operations

Revenue

We generate substantially all of our revenue through the sale of our advertising products, which include Snap Ads and Sponsored Creative Tools, and measurement services, referred to as advertising revenue. We sell advertising directly to advertisers, referred to as Snap-sold revenue. Certain partners that provide content on Snapchat, or content partners, also sell directly to advertisers, referred to as partner-sold revenue. We report Snap-sold revenue on a gross basis and partner-sold revenue on a net basis. Currently, our Sponsored Creative Tools, which include Sponsored Lenses and Sponsored Geofilters, and our measurement services are only Snap-sold. For the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, approximately 94% and 91% of our advertising revenue was Snap-sold, respectively, and approximately 6% and 9% was partner-sold, respectively. Snap Ads whether Snap-sold or partner-sold, may be subject to revenue sharing arrangements between us and the content partner.

We also generate revenue from sales of our hardware product, Spectacles. This revenue is reported net of allowances for returns.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue consists primarily of payments to third-party infrastructure partners for hosting our products. Hosting costs primarilyproducts, which include expenses related to bandwidth,storage, computing, and storagebandwidth costs. Cost of revenue also includes payments for content and third party selling costs, referred to as revenue share payments to our content partners, content creation costs, which include personnel-related costs, and advertising measurement services.share. In addition, cost of revenue includes inventoryadvertising measurement services, and personnel-related costs, for Spectaclesincluding salaries, benefits, and stock-based compensation expenses. In addition, cost of revenue includes facilities and other supporting overhead costs, including depreciation and amortization.amortization, and inventory costs for Spectacles.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel-related costs, including salaries, benefits, and stock-based compensation expense for our engineers, designers, and other employees engaged in the research and development of our products. In addition, research and development expenses include facilities and other supporting overhead costs, including depreciation and amortization. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

Sales and Marketing Expenses

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of personnel-related costs, including salaries, benefits, commissions, and stock-based compensation expense for our employees engaged in sales and sales support, business development, media, marketing, corporate partnerships, communications, and customer service functions. Sales and marketing expenses also include costs incurred for indirect advertising, market research, tradeshows, branding, marketing, promotional expense, and public relations, as well as facilities and other supporting overhead costs, including depreciation and amortization.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel-related costs, including salaries, benefits, and stock-based compensation expense for our executives, finance, legal, information technology, human resources, and other administrative teams, includingteams. General and administrative expenses also include facilities and supporting overhead costs, andincluding depreciation and amortization. Generalamortization, and administrative expenses also include external professional services.

Interest Income

Interest income consists primarily of interest earned on our cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities.

Interest Expense

Interest expense consists primarily of interest on build-to-suit lease financing obligationsexpense associated with our senior convertible notes, or the Convertible Notes, and commitment fees and amortization of financing costs related to our Credit Facility.revolving credit facility. In the prior period, interest expense also included interest on build-to-suit lease financing obligations.


Other Income (Expense), Net

Other income (expense), net consists of realized gains and losses on sales of marketable securities, our portion of equity methodnon-marketable investment income and losses, and foreign currency transaction gains and losses. Other income (expense), net also includes any gains or losses on divestitures of businesses.

Income Tax Benefit (Expense)

We are subject to income taxes in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. These foreign jurisdictions have different statutory tax rates than the United States. Additionally, certain of our foreign earnings may also be taxable in the United States. Accordingly, our effective tax rates will vary depending on the relative proportion of foreign to domestic income, use of foreign tax credits, changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, and changes in tax laws.


Adjusted EBITDA

We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss), excluding interest income; interest expense; other income (expense), net; income tax benefit (expense); depreciation and amortization; stock-based compensation expense and related payroll tax expense; and certain other non-cash or non-recurring items impacting net income (loss) from time to time. We consider the exclusion of certain non-cash and non-recurring expenses in calculating Adjusted EBITDA to provide a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons of our business and for investors and others to evaluate our operating results in the same manner as does our management. Additionally, we believe that Adjusted EBITDA is an important measure since we use third-party infrastructure partners to host our services and therefore we do not incur significant capital expenditures to support revenue-generating activities. See “Selected Financial DataNon-GAAP Financial Measures” for additional information and a reconciliation of net loss to Adjusted EBITDA.

Discussion of Results of Operations

The following table sets forth our consolidated statements of operations data:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

(in thousands)

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

824,949

 

 

$

404,482

 

 

$

58,663

 

$

1,715,534

 

 

$

1,180,446

 

 

$

824,949

 

Costs and expenses(1) (2):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of revenue

 

 

717,462

 

 

 

451,660

 

 

 

182,341

 

 

895,838

 

 

 

798,865

 

 

 

717,462

 

Research and development

 

 

1,534,863

 

 

 

183,676

 

 

 

82,235

 

 

883,509

 

 

 

772,185

 

 

 

1,534,863

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

522,605

 

 

 

124,371

 

 

 

27,216

 

 

458,598

 

 

 

400,824

 

 

 

522,605

 

General and administrative

 

 

1,535,595

 

 

 

165,160

 

 

 

148,600

 

 

580,917

 

 

 

477,022

 

 

 

1,535,595

 

Total costs and expenses

 

 

4,310,525

 

 

 

924,867

 

 

 

440,392

 

 

2,818,862

 

 

 

2,448,896

 

 

 

4,310,525

 

Loss from operations

 

 

(3,485,576

)

 

 

(520,385

)

 

 

(381,729

)

Operating loss

 

(1,103,328

)

 

 

(1,268,450

)

 

 

(3,485,576

)

Interest income

 

 

21,096

 

 

 

4,654

 

 

 

1,399

 

 

36,042

 

 

 

27,228

 

 

 

21,096

 

Interest expense

 

 

(3,456

)

 

 

(1,424

)

 

 

 

 

(24,994

)

 

 

(3,894

)

 

 

(3,456

)

Other income (expense), net

 

 

4,528

 

 

 

(4,568

)

 

 

(152

)

 

59,013

 

 

 

(8,248

)

 

 

4,528

 

Loss before income taxes

 

 

(3,463,408

)

 

 

(521,723

)

 

 

(380,482

)

 

(1,033,267

)

 

 

(1,253,364

)

 

 

(3,463,408

)

Income tax benefit (expense)

 

 

18,342

 

 

 

7,080

 

 

 

7,589

 

 

(393

)

 

 

(2,547

)

 

 

18,342

 

Net loss

 

$

(3,445,066

)

 

$

(514,643

)

 

$

(372,893

)

$

(1,033,660

)

 

$

(1,255,911

)

 

$

(3,445,066

)

Adjusted EBITDA(3)

 

$

(720,056

)

 

$

(459,243

)

 

$

(292,898

)

$

(202,230

)

 

$

(575,637

)

 

$

(720,056

)

 

(1)

Stock-based compensation and related payroll tax expense included in the above line items:


 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

(in thousands)

 

Stock-based compensation and related payroll tax expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of revenue

 

$

26,518

 

 

$

532

 

 

$

488

 

$

6,365

 

 

$

4,393

 

 

$

26,071

 

Research and development

 

 

1,163,839

 

 

 

21,993

 

 

 

10,309

 

 

464,639

 

 

 

340,533

 

 

 

1,154,430

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

238,827

 

 

 

3,967

 

 

 

3,534

 

 

93,355

 

 

 

84,059

 

 

 

236,474

 

General and administrative

 

 

1,235,181

 

 

 

5,535

 

 

 

59,193

 

 

121,654

 

 

 

109,226

 

 

 

1,222,920

 

Total

 

$

2,664,365

 

 

$

32,027

 

 

$

73,524

 

$

686,013

 

 

$

538,211

 

 

$

2,639,895

 

 

(2)

Depreciation and amortization expense included in the above line items:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

(in thousands)

 

Depreciation and amortization expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of revenue

 

$

15,222

 

 

$

2,206

 

 

$

126

 

$

21,271

 

 

$

26,282

 

 

$

15,222

 

Research and development

 

 

25,076

 

 

 

17,755

 

 

 

11,086

 

 

33,208

 

 

 

33,001

 

 

 

25,076

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

10,450

 

 

 

3,175

 

 

 

289

 

 

13,256

 

 

 

15,089

 

 

 

10,450

 

General and administrative

 

 

10,540

 

 

 

5,979

 

 

 

3,806

 

 

19,510

 

 

 

17,276

 

 

 

10,540

 

Total

 

$

61,288

 

 

$

29,115

 

 

$

15,307

 

$

87,245

 

 

$

91,648

 

 

$

61,288

 

 

(3)

See “Selected Financial Data—Non-GAAP Financial Measures” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information and for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net loss, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.


The following table sets forth the components of our consolidated statements of operations data for each of the periods presented as a percentage of revenue:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of revenue

 

 

87

 

 

 

112

 

 

 

311

 

 

52

 

 

 

68

 

 

 

87

 

Research and development

 

 

186

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

140

 

 

52

 

 

 

65

 

 

 

186

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

63

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

46

 

 

27

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

63

 

General and administrative

 

 

186

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

253

 

 

34

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

186

 

Total costs and expenses

 

 

523

 

 

 

229

 

 

 

751

 

 

164

 

 

 

207

 

 

 

523

 

Loss from operations

 

 

423

 

 

 

129

 

 

 

651

 

Operating loss

 

64

 

 

 

107

 

 

 

423

 

Interest income

 

 

3

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

2

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

3

 

Interest expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income (expense), net

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

Loss before income taxes

 

 

420

 

 

 

129

 

 

 

649

 

 

60

 

 

 

106

 

 

 

420

 

Income tax benefit (expense)

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

Net loss

 

 

418

%

 

 

127

%

 

 

636

%

 

60

%

 

 

106

%

 

 

418

%

 

Revenue

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017 vs 2016

Change

 

 

2016 vs 2015

Change

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

 

(NM = Not Meaningful)

Revenue

 

$

824,949

 

 

$

404,482

 

 

$

58,663

 

 

$

420,467

 

 

 

104

%

 

$

345,819

 

 

NM


 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2019 vs 2018

Change

 

 

2018 vs 2017

Change

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

Revenue

$

1,715,534

 

 

$

1,180,446

 

 

$

824,949

 

 

$

535,088

 

 

 

45

%

 

$

355,497

 

 

 

43

%

 

20172019 compared to 20162018

Revenue for the year ended December 31, 20172019 increased $420.5$535.1 million compared to the same period in 2016. The increase2018. Revenue increased due to growth in revenue was primarily due toadvertising demand, which resulted in an increase in the number of advertisements delivered. The number of advertisements delivered increased between the periods primarily dueimpressions. We continue to an increase inoptimize our self-serve platform, enabling advertisers to more easily access our inventory and demand across our product offerings, our growing sales efforts, and increased user engagement as measured by an 18% increase in DAUs. Additionally, there was incremental spend in advertisements sold through our advertising API which launched in November 2016, allowing advertisers access to additional inventoryreach more users at a lower price than our direct sales channels. ARPU increased due to the growth in revenue as a result of the number of advertisements delivered, which outpaced DAU growth during the period.

Snap-sold revenue was $754.3 million and partner-sold revenue was $48.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $365.0 million for Snap-sold revenue and $34.9 million for partner-sold revenue during the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in both Snap-sold revenue and partner-sold revenue was due to an increase in the number of advertisements delivered, and for partner-sold revenue, the number of partners.

2016 compared to 2015

Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased $345.8 million compared to the same period in 2015. Revenue grew between the periods primarily due to an increase in the number of advertisements delivered. The number of advertisements delivered increased between the periods primarily due to increased advertiser demand across our product offerings, our growing sales team, and increased user engagement as measured by a 48% increase in DAUs. ARPU increased due to the growth in revenue as a result of the number of advertisements delivered, which outpaced DAU growth during theprior period.

Snap-sold revenue was $365.0 million and partner-sold revenue was $34.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $50.9 million for Snap-sold revenue and $7.7 million for partner-sold revenue during the year ended December 31, 2015.

Quarterly discussion

Revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2017 was $285.7 million, compared to $207.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the number of advertisements delivered, partially offset by an increase in advertising inventory sold through our API which tends to be at a lower price.

Cost of Revenue

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017 vs 2016

Change

 

 

2016 vs 2015

Change

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

Cost of revenue

 

$

717,462

 

 

$

451,660

 

 

$

182,341

 

 

$

265,802

 

 

 

59

%

 

$

269,319

 

 

 

148

%

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2019 vs 2018

Change

 

 

2018 vs 2017

Change

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

Cost of Revenue

$

895,838

 

 

$

798,865

 

 

$

717,462

 

 

$

96,973

 

 

 

12

%

 

$

81,403

 

 

 

11

%

 

20172019 compared to 20162018

Cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 20172019 increased $265.8$97.0 million, or 59%12%, compared to the same period in 2016. 2018. The increase in cost of revenue primarily consisted of $104.9 million related to increased hosting costs, in part attributable to DAU growth of 18% between the periods, $38.4 million related to increased revenue share payments to our partnerscosts of $54.4 million, consistent with our overall increase in revenue, $16.0revenue. Additionally, the increase was driven by increased infrastructure costs of $37.9 million, related to increase measurement services consistent with overall increase in revenue, $15.2 million related to product costs for Spectacles, which launched in the fourth quarter of 2016, $39.9 million of Spectacles inventory-related charges in the third quarter of 2017, as described below, and $47.7 million related to increased measurement and content creation costs. Content creation costs include personnel-related costs, including $26.1 million primarily related to stock-based compensation expense primarily due to the recognition of expense related to RSUs with a performance condition satisfied on the effectiveness of the registration statement for our IPO in March 2017.


The $39.9 million of Spectacles inventory-related charges during the third quarter of 2017 were composed of $19.5 million of excess inventory reserves, $17.9 million of inventory purchase commitment cancellation charges, and $2.5 million of asset impairments. The charges were recorded based on management’s updated assessment in the third quarter. Our estimates related to the Spectacles inventory-related charges include judgments related to estimates of future sales, purchase commitment recoverability, and revised management assessments. These estimates were based on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Our actual results could differ from these estimates.

2016 compared to 2015

Cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased $269.3 million, or 148%, compared to the same period in 2015. The increase in cost of revenue primarily consisted of $191.9 million related to increased hosting costs, in part attributable to DAU growth of 48%and increased user activity between the periods, $48.2 million related tonet of infrastructure cost efficiencies, and increased revenue share payments to our partners consistent with our overall increase in revenue, and $13.3 million related to increased content creation costs, which include personnel-related costs.advertising measurement expenses.

Research and Development Expenses

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017 vs 2016

Change

 

2016 vs 2015

Change

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

(NM = Not Meaningful)

 

Research and Development Expenses

 

$

1,534,863

 

 

$

183,676

 

 

$

82,235

 

 

$

1,351,187

 

 

NM

 

$

101,441

 

 

 

123

%

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2019 vs 2018

Change

 

 

2018 vs 2017

Change

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

Research and Development Expenses

$

883,509

 

 

$

772,185

 

 

$

1,534,863

 

 

$

111,324

 

 

 

14

%

 

$

(762,678

)

 

 

(50

)%


 

20172019 compared to 20162018

Research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 20172019 increased $1.4 billion$111.3 million compared to the same period in 2016. 2018. The increase was due to a $1.1 billionprimarily driven by an increase in stock-based compensation expense primarily dueof $124.1 million. The prior period included a $24.6 million stock-based compensation forfeiture benefit related to the recognition of expense related to RSUs with a performance condition satisfied on the effectiveness of the registration statement for our IPO2018 reduction in March 2017. The increase was also driven by an increase in research and development headcount of approximately 84%. The investment in personnel supported our efforts to continue growing our user base and building and improving products for our users and advertisers.

2016 compared to 2015

Research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased $101.4 million, or 123%, compared to the same period in 2015. The increase was primarily due to an increase in research and development headcount, and the related salaries, benefits, and stock-based compensation expenses. The investment in personnel supported our efforts to continue growing our user base and building and improving products for our users and advertisers.force.

Sales and Marketing Expenses

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017 vs 2016

Change

 

 

2016 vs 2015

Change

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

Sales and Marketing Expenses

 

$

522,605

 

 

$

124,371

 

 

$

27,216

 

 

$

398,234

 

 

 

320

%

 

$

97,155

 

 

 

357

%

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2019 vs 2018

Change

 

 

2018 vs 2017

Change

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

Sales and Marketing Expenses

$

458,598

 

 

$

400,824

 

 

$

522,605

 

 

$

57,774

 

 

 

14

%

 

$

(121,781

)

 

 

(23

)%

 

20172019 compared to 20162018

Sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 20172019 increased $398.2$57.8 million compared to the same period in 2016. 2018. The increase was primarily due to a $232.5 million increase in stock-based compensation expense primarily due to the recognition of expense related to RSUs with a performance condition satisfied on the effectiveness of the registration statement for our IPO in March 2017. The increase for the year ended December 31, 2017 was also due to an increase in sales and marketing headcount of approximately 80% and an increase in marketing events and related expenses.


2016 compared to 2015

Sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016driven by increased $97.2 million, or 357%, compared to the same period in 2015. The increase was primarily due to an increase in sales and marketing headcount of approximately 340%. We also made marketing investments during the year ended December 31, 2016.of $52.6 million.

General and Administrative Expenses

  

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017 vs 2016

Change

 

2016 vs 2015

Change

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

(NM = Not Meaningful)

 

General and Administrative Expenses

 

$

1,535,595

 

 

$

165,160

 

 

$

148,600

 

 

$

1,370,435

 

 

NM

 

$

16,560

 

 

 

11

%

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2019 vs 2018

Change

 

 

2018 vs 2017

Change

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

General and Administrative Expenses

$

580,917

 

 

$

477,022

 

 

$

1,535,595

 

 

$

103,895

 

 

 

22

%

 

$

(1,058,573

)

 

 

(69

)%

 

20172019 compared to 20162018

General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 20172019 increased $1.4 billion$103.9 million compared to the same period in 2016.2018. The increase was driven by an increase in legal expenses primarily due to the legal charges of $100.0 million for the preliminary settlement agreement of the securities class actions that arose following our IPO. Additionally, the increase was driven by an increase in personnel expenses of $21.3 million, primarily due to an increase in stock-based compensation expense, of $1.2 billion, composed of an award granted to our CEO with an expense of $636.6 million and the remainder primarily related to the recognition of expense related to RSUs with a performance condition satisfied on the effectiveness of the registration statement for our IPO in March 2017. The increase for the year ended December 31, 2017 was also driven by increased personnel costs from an increase in general and administrative headcount of approximately 24%. Additionally, there was an increase in professional fees related to increased acquisition activity, legal,service and general growth.

2016 compared to 2015

General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased $16.6 million, or 11%, compared to the same period in 2015.other corporate expenses. The increase was primarily due to increased personnel costs from an increase in general and administrative headcount of approximately 220%, partially offset by $43.6a decrease in facilities costs, as the prior period included $33.0 million of stock-based compensation from the accelerated vesting of modified stock-based compensation awards for certain former employees in 2015.lease exit charges.

Interest Income

  

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017 vs 2016

Change

 

 

2016 vs 2015

Change

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

Interest Income

 

$

21,096

 

 

$

4,654

 

 

$

1,399

 

 

$

16,442

 

 

 

353

%

 

$

3,255

 

 

 

233

%

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2019 vs 2018

Change

 

 

2018 vs 2017

Change

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

Interest Income

$

36,042

 

 

$

27,228

 

 

$

21,096

 

 

$

8,814

 

 

 

32

%

 

$

6,132

 

 

 

29

%

 

20172019 compared to 20162018

Interest income for the year ended December 31, 20172019 increased $16.4$8.8 million compared to the same period in 2016. 2018. The increase was primarily a result of a larger invested balance in marketable securities and higher interest rates on U.S. government-backed securities.

2016 compared to 2015

Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased $3.3 million, or 233%, compared to the same period in 2015. The increase was primarilysecurities and a higher overall invested cash balance as a result of a larger invested balance in marketable securities, which returned a higher rate of interest.the Convertible Notes offering.


Interest Expense

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017 vs 2016

Change

 

 

2016 vs 2015

Change

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

 

(NM = Not Meaningful)

Interest Expense

 

$

(3,456

)

 

$

(1,424

)

 

$

 

 

$

(2,032

)

 

 

143

%

 

$

(1,424

)

 

NM

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2019 vs 2018

Change

 

2018 vs 2017

Change

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

$

 

 

%

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

(NM = Not Meaningful)

Interest Expense

$

(24,994

)

 

$

(3,894

)

 

$

(3,456

)

 

$

(21,100

)

 

NM

 

$

(438

)

 

NM


 

20172019 compared to 20162018

Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $3.52019 increased $21.1 million, compared to $1.4 million in the same period in 2016. Interest2018. The increase in interest expense was composed primarily of interest on financing obligations related to a build-to-suit lease placed into service in the third quarter of 2016 and commitment fees and amortization of costs relatedcurrent period relates to our Credit Facility, which was executed in the third quarter of 2016.

2016 compared to 2015

Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $1.4 million, compared to $0 in the same period in 2015. Interest expense was composed primarily of interest on build-to-suit lease financing obligations placed into service in the third quarter of 2016 and commitment fees and amortization of costs related to our Credit Facility, which was executed in the third quarter of 2016.Convertible Notes.

Other Income (Expense), Net

  

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017 vs 2016

Change

 

 

2016 vs 2015

Change

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

 

(NM = Not Meaningful)

Other Income (Expense), Net

 

$

4,528

 

 

$

(4,568

)

 

$

(152

)

 

$

9,096

 

 

 

199

%

 

$

(4,416

)

 

NM

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2019 vs 2018

Change

 

2018 vs 2017

Change

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

$

 

 

%

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

(NM = Not Meaningful)

Other Income (Expense), Net

$

59,013

 

 

$

(8,248

)

 

$

4,528

 

 

$

67,261

 

 

NM

 

$

(12,776

)

 

NM

 

20172019 compared to 20162018

Other income, net for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $4.52019 increased $67.3 million, compared to other expense, net of $4.6$8.2 million for the same period in 2016. The change from2018. Other income, net for the comparative periodcurrent year was primarily a result of a decreasegain of $39.9 million on the divestiture of Placed, LLC, or Placed, a location-based measurement services company that was divested in our share of losses2019, as well as gains on equity method investments and an increase in foreign currency transaction gains.

2016 compared to 2015

non-marketable investments. Other expense, net forin the prior year ended December 31, 2016 was $4.6 million. The increase in expense was primarily a result of an increase in our share$7.2 million of losses on equity method investments and an increase in foreign currency transaction losses, partially offset by gains on sales of marketable securities.non-marketable investment impairment expense.

Income Tax Benefit (Expense)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017 vs 2016

Change

 

 

2016 vs 2015

Change

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2019 vs 2018

Change

 

 

2018 vs 2017

Change

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

Income Tax Benefit (Expense)

 

$

18,342

 

 

$

7,080

 

 

$

7,589

 

 

$

11,262

 

 

 

159

%

 

$

(509

)

 

 

-7

%

$

(393

)

 

$

(2,547

)

 

$

18,342

 

 

$

2,154

 

 

 

(85

)%

 

$

(20,889

)

 

 

(114

)%

Effective Tax Rate

 

 

0.5

%

 

 

1.4

%

 

 

2.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.0

)%

 

 

(0.2

)%

 

 

0.5

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


20172019 compared to 20162018

Income tax benefitexpense was $18.3$0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 20172019, compared to $7.1$2.5 million for the same period in 2016. The income tax benefits in both periods were primarily from the partial releases of valuation allowances against our net deferred tax assets. The valuation allowance releases were the result of net deferred tax liabilities originating from acquisitions that were an available source of income to realize a portion of our deferred tax assets.2018.

2016 compared to 2015

Income tax benefit was $7.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $7.6 million for the same period in 2015. The income tax benefits in both periods were primarily from the partial release of a valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets. The valuation allowance release was the result of net deferred tax liabilities originating from acquisitions that were an available source of income to realize a portion of our deferred tax assets.

Our effective tax rate differs from the U.S. statutory tax rate primarily due to a valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets as it is more likely than not that some or all of our deferred tax assets will not be realized.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, or the Tax Act, was signed into law making significant changes to the Code. Changes include, but are not limited to, a corporate tax rate decrease to 21% effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. This change in tax rate resulted in a reduction in our net U.S. deferred tax assets before valuation allowance by $396.2 million, which was fully offset by a reduction in our valuation allowance. The other provisions of the Tax Act, including the one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of cumulative foreign earnings, did not have a material impact on our financial statements as of December 31, 2017.

For additional discussion, see Note 811 to our consolidated financial statements included in “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Net Loss and Adjusted EBITDA

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2019 vs 2018

Change

 

 

2018 vs 2017

Change

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

(NM = Not Meaningful)

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

Net Loss

 

$

(3,445,066

)

 

$

(514,643

)

 

$

(372,893

)

$

(1,033,660

)

 

$

(1,255,911

)

 

$

(3,445,066

)

 

$

222,251

 

 

 

(18

)%

 

$

2,189,155

 

 

 

(64

)%

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

(720,056

)

 

$

(459,243

)

 

$

(292,898

)

$

(202,230

)

 

$

(575,637

)

 

$

(720,056

)

 

$

373,407

 

 

 

(65

)%

 

$

144,419

 

 

 

(20

)%

 

20172019 compared to 20162018

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 20172019 was $3.4$1.0 billion, compared to $514.6 million$1.3 billion for the same period in 2016.2018. Adjusted EBITDA loss for the year ended December 31, 20172019 was $720.1$202.2 million, compared to $459.2$575.6 million for the same period in 2016. 2018. The increasedecrease in netAdjusted EBITDA loss for the period was driven by a $2.6 billion increase in stock-based compensation expense primarily related to an equity award granted to our CEO, or the CEO award, and the recognition of expense related to RSUs with a performance condition satisfied on the effectiveness of the registration statement for our IPO in March 2017. Additionally, the increase in net loss was also drivenincreased revenues, partially offset by $39.9 million of Spectacles inventory-related charges in the third quarter of 2017. The remaining increase in net loss and the increase in Adjusted EBITDA was driven by an increase inincreased cost of revenue and operating expenses, which more than offset revenue growth duringmarketing expenses. Additionally, the period. The increasedecrease in cost of revenue was primarily related to higher hosting costs. The increase in operating expenses was primarily related to increased headcount.

2016 compared to 2015

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $514.6 million, compared to $372.9 million for the same period in 2015. Adjusted EBITDA loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $459.4 million, compared to $292.9 million for the same period in 2015. The increase in net loss and Adjusted EBITDA loss was primarily a result of a gain of $39.9 million on the divestiture of Placed, as well as decreased facilities costs, as the prior period included lease exit charges of $33.0 million. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in costlegal expense of revenue$100.0 million for the preliminary settlement agreement of securities class actions that arose following our IPO and operating expenses, which more than offset revenue growth during the period. Thean increase in coststock-based compensation expense of revenue was primarily related to higher hosting costs and revenue share payments to our partners for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in operating expenses was primarily related to increased headcount.$147.8 million.


For a discussion of the limitations associated with using Adjusted EBITDA rather than GAAP measures and a reconciliation of this measure to net loss, see “Selected Financial Data—Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

Unaudited Quarterly Results of Operations Data

The following table sets forth the primary components of our unaudited quarterly consolidated statements of cash flows for each of the four quarters in the periods ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. These unaudited quarterly statements of cash flows have been prepared on the same basis as our audited consolidated financial statements included in “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, the financial information reflects all normal recurring adjustments necessary for the fair statement of results of operations for these periods. This information should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of historical periods are not necessarily indicative of the results in any future period.

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

June 30,

2018

 

 

September 30,

2018

 

 

December 31,

2018

 

 

March 31,

2019

 

 

June 30,

2019

 

 

September 30,

2019

 

 

December 31,

2019

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash used in operating activities

$

(231,981

)

 

$

(199,346

)

 

$

(132,543

)

 

$

(126,054

)

 

$

(66,178

)

 

$

(95,789

)

 

$

(76,149

)

 

$

(66,842

)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

319,247

 

 

 

123,208

 

 

 

89,561

 

 

 

162,438

 

 

 

(80,928

)

 

 

184,715

 

 

 

(688,319

)

 

 

(144,076

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

45,258

 

 

 

1,914

 

 

 

142

 

 

 

123

 

 

 

5,596

 

 

 

1,342

 

 

 

1,157,550

 

 

 

1,364

 

Change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

$

132,524

 

 

$

(74,224

)

 

$

(42,840

)

 

$

36,507

 

 

$

(141,510

)

 

$

90,268

 

 

$

393,082

 

 

$

(209,554

)

The following table sets forth the major components of our unaudited quarterly consolidated statements of operations for each of the eightfour quarters in the periodperiods ended December 31, 2017.2019 and December 31, 2018. These unaudited quarterly results of operations have been prepared on the same basis as our audited consolidated financial statements included in “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, the financial information reflects all normal recurring adjustments necessary for the fair statement of results of operations for these periods. This information should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of historical periods are not necessarily indicative of the results in any future period.

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

March 31,

2016

 

 

June 30,

2016

 

 

September 30,

2016

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

March 31,

2017

 

 

June 30,

2017

 

 

September 30,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

June 30,

2018

 

 

September 30,

2018

 

 

December 31,

2018

 

 

March 31,

2019

 

 

June 30,

2019

 

 

September 30,

2019

 

 

December 31,

2019

 

 

(in thousands)

 

(in thousands)

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

38,798

 

 

$

71,798

 

 

$

128,204

 

 

$

165,682

 

 

$

149,648

 

 

$

181,671

 

 

$

207,937

 

 

$

285,693

 

$

230,666

 

 

$

262,263

 

 

$

297,695

 

 

$

389,822

 

 

$

320,426

 

 

$

388,021

 

 

$

446,199

 

 

$

560,888

 

Costs and expenses(1) (2):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of revenue

 

 

75,773

 

 

 

94,757

 

 

 

127,780

 

 

 

153,350

 

 

 

163,358

 

 

 

152,148

 

 

 

210,710

 

 

 

191,246

 

 

196,798

 

 

 

191,565

 

 

 

197,554

 

 

 

212,948

 

 

 

203,767

 

 

 

215,492

 

 

 

223,140

 

 

 

253,439

 

Research and development

 

 

28,098

 

 

 

36,052

 

 

 

54,562

 

 

 

64,964

 

 

 

805,848

 

 

 

255,735

 

 

 

239,442

 

 

 

233,838

 

 

200,986

 

 

 

203,246

 

 

 

203,510

 

 

 

164,443

 

 

 

216,185

 

 

 

236,199

 

 

 

211,599

 

 

 

219,526

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

14,737

 

 

 

24,587

 

 

 

34,658

 

 

 

50,389

 

 

 

219,733

 

 

 

90,903

 

 

 

101,511

 

 

 

110,458

 

 

102,113

 

 

 

101,685

 

 

 

97,552

 

 

 

99,474

 

 

 

97,882

 

 

 

111,504

 

 

 

123,240

 

 

 

125,972

 

General and administrative

 

 

24,011

 

 

 

32,261

 

 

 

42,172

 

 

 

66,716

 

 

 

1,174,476

 

 

 

131,903

 

 

 

118,101

 

 

 

111,115

 

 

123,299

 

 

 

123,609

 

 

 

122,450

 

 

 

107,664

 

 

 

118,653

 

 

 

129,644

 

 

 

117,073

 

 

 

215,547

 

Total costs and expenses

 

 

142,619

 

 

 

187,657

 

 

 

259,172

 

 

 

335,419

 

 

 

2,363,415

 

 

 

630,689

 

 

 

669,764

 

 

 

646,657

 

 

623,196

 

 

 

620,105

 

 

 

621,066

 

 

 

584,529

 

 

 

636,487

 

 

 

692,839

 

 

 

675,052

 

 

 

814,484

 

Loss from operations

 

 

(103,821

)

 

 

(115,859

)

 

 

(130,968

)

 

 

(169,737

)

 

 

(2,213,767

)

 

 

(449,018

)

 

 

(461,827

)

 

 

(360,964

)

Operating loss

 

(392,530

)

 

 

(357,842

)

 

 

(323,371

)

 

 

(194,707

)

 

 

(316,061

)

 

 

(304,818

)

 

 

(228,853

)

 

 

(253,596

)

Interest income

 

 

359

 

 

 

871

 

 

 

1,938

 

 

 

1,486

 

 

 

2,424

 

 

 

6,349

 

 

 

6,253

 

 

 

6,070

 

 

6,104

 

 

 

6,600

 

 

 

7,011

 

 

 

7,513

 

 

 

7,816

 

 

 

7,446

 

 

 

10,317

 

 

 

10,463

 

Interest expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(648

)

 

 

(776

)

 

 

(695

)

 

 

(998

)

 

 

(887

)

 

 

(876

)

 

(934

)

 

 

(930

)

 

 

(919

)

 

 

(1,111

)

 

 

(756

)

 

 

(809

)

 

 

(8,654

)

 

 

(14,775

)

Other income (expense), net

 

 

(993

)

 

 

(939

)

 

 

(1,421

)

 

 

(1,215

)

 

 

187

 

 

 

786

 

 

 

1,002

 

 

 

2,553

 

 

3,153

 

 

 

(61

)

 

 

(7,625

)

 

 

(3,715

)

 

 

(1,127

)

 

 

44,085

 

 

 

(1,481

)

 

 

17,536

 

Loss before income taxes

 

 

(104,455

)

 

 

(115,927

)

 

 

(131,099

)

 

 

(170,242

)

 

 

(2,211,851

)

 

 

(442,881

)

 

 

(455,459

)

 

 

(353,217

)

 

(384,207

)

 

 

(352,233

)

 

 

(324,904

)

 

 

(192,020

)

 

 

(310,128

)

 

 

(254,096

)

 

 

(228,671

)

 

 

(240,372

)

Income tax benefit (expense)

 

 

(121

)

 

 

33

 

 

 

6,871

 

 

 

297

 

 

 

3,014

 

 

 

(212

)

 

 

12,300

 

 

 

3,240

 

 

(1,578

)

 

 

(1,077

)

 

 

(244

)

 

 

352

 

 

 

(279

)

 

 

(1,078

)

 

 

1,296

 

 

 

(332

)

Net loss

 

$

(104,576

)

 

$

(115,894

)

 

$

(124,228

)

 

$

(169,945

)

 

$

(2,208,837

)

 

$

(443,093

)

 

$

(443,159

)

 

$

(349,977

)

$

(385,785

)

 

$

(353,310

)

 

$

(325,148

)

 

$

(191,668

)

 

$

(310,407

)

 

$

(255,174

)

 

$

(227,375

)

 

$

(240,704

)

 


(1)

Stock-based compensation expense included in the above line items:

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

March 31,

2016

 

 

June 30,

2016

 

 

September 30,

2016

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

March 31,

2017

 

 

June 30,

2017

 

 

September 30,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

June 30,

2018

 

 

September 30,

2018

 

 

December 31,

2018

 

 

March 31,

2019

 

 

June 30,

2019

 

 

September 30,

2019

 

 

December 31,

2019

 

 

(in thousands)

 

(in thousands)

 

Stock-based compensation and related payroll tax expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of revenue

 

$

154

 

 

$

128

 

 

$

128

 

 

$

122

 

 

$

20,026

 

 

$

2,223

 

 

$

2,039

 

 

$

2,230

 

$

276

 

 

$

1,467

 

 

$

1,368

 

 

$

1,283

 

 

$

1,849

 

 

$

1,786

 

 

$

1,332

 

 

$

1,398

 

Research and development

 

 

2,648

 

 

 

2,700

 

 

 

12,143

 

 

 

4,449

 

 

 

722,129

 

 

 

163,848

 

 

 

146,531

 

 

 

131,331

 

 

77,815

 

 

 

92,303

 

 

 

95,329

 

 

 

75,086

 

 

 

112,242

 

 

 

132,610

 

 

 

108,176

 

 

 

111,611

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

775

 

 

 

553

 

 

 

1,262

 

 

 

1,377

 

 

 

160,942

 

 

 

20,558

 

 

 

27,968

 

 

 

29,359

 

 

16,185

 

 

 

21,996

 

 

 

25,082

 

 

 

20,795

 

 

 

17,760

 

 

 

26,474

 

 

 

23,333

 

 

 

25,788

 

General and administrative

 

 

1,961

 

 

 

1,361

 

 

 

1,394

 

 

 

819

 

 

 

1,109,977

 

 

 

55,814

 

 

 

49,054

 

 

 

20,336

 

 

38,982

 

 

 

40,605

 

 

 

5,030

 

 

 

24,608

 

 

 

30,705

 

 

 

34,704

 

 

 

28,387

 

 

 

27,858

 

Total

 

$

5,538

 

 

$

4,742

 

 

$

14,927

 

 

$

6,767

 

 

$

2,013,074

 

 

$

242,443

 

 

$

225,592

 

 

$

183,256

 

$

133,258

 

 

$

156,371

 

 

$

126,809

 

 

$

121,772

 

 

$

162,556

 

 

$

195,574

 

 

$

161,228

 

 

$

166,655

 

 

(2)

Depreciation and amortization expense included in the above line items:


 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

March 31,

2016

 

 

June 30,

2016

 

 

September 30,

2016

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

March 31,

2017

 

 

June 30,

2017

 

 

September 30,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

June 30,

2018

 

 

September 30,

2018

 

 

December 31,

2018

 

 

March 31,

2019

 

 

June 30,

2019

 

 

September 30,

2019

 

 

December 31,

2019

 

 

(in thousands)

 

(in thousands)

 

Depreciation and amortization expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of revenue

 

$

71

 

 

$

99

 

 

$

778

 

 

$

1,258

 

 

$

1,669

 

 

$

2,970

 

 

$

5,404

 

 

$

5,179

 

$

5,202

 

 

$

5,610

 

 

$

5,582

 

 

$

9,888

 

 

$

6,146

 

 

$

5,642

 

 

$

4,580

 

 

$

4,903

 

Research and development

 

 

3,611

 

 

 

4,164

 

 

 

4,623

 

 

 

5,357

 

 

 

5,755

 

 

 

5,983

 

 

 

6,401

 

 

 

6,937

 

 

8,791

 

 

 

9,489

 

 

 

10,174

 

 

 

4,547

 

 

 

8,650

 

 

 

7,188

 

 

 

8,632

 

 

 

8,738

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

150

 

 

 

236

 

 

 

394

 

 

 

2,395

 

 

 

2,600

 

 

 

1,589

 

 

 

2,820

 

 

 

3,441

 

 

3,569

 

 

 

3,991

 

 

 

4,054

 

 

 

3,475

 

 

 

4,015

 

 

 

3,045

 

 

 

3,109

 

 

 

3,087

 

General and administrative

 

 

1,217

 

 

 

1,497

 

 

 

1,642

 

 

 

1,623

 

 

 

2,426

 

 

 

2,043

 

 

 

2,842

 

 

 

3,229

 

 

3,991

 

 

 

3,424

 

 

 

5,088

 

 

 

4,772

 

 

 

4,508

 

 

 

6,785

 

 

 

4,325

 

 

 

3,892

 

Total

 

$

5,049

 

 

$

5,996

 

 

$

7,437

 

 

$

10,633

 

 

$

12,450

 

 

$

12,585

 

 

$

17,467

 

 

$

18,786

 

$

21,553

 

 

$

22,514

 

 

$

24,898

 

 

$

22,682

 

 

$

23,319

 

 

$

22,660

 

 

$

20,646

 

 

$

20,620

 

 

The following table presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net loss, the most comparable GAAP financial measure, for each of the periods presented:

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31,

2016

 

 

June 30,

2016

 

 

September 30,

2016

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

March 31,

2017

 

 

June 30,

2017

 

 

September 30,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(104,576

)

 

$

(115,894

)

 

$

(124,228

)

 

$

(169,945

)

 

$

(2,208,837

)

 

$

(443,093

)

 

$

(443,159

)

 

$

(349,977

)

Add (deduct):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

 

(359

)

 

 

(871

)

 

 

(1,938

)

 

 

(1,486

)

 

 

(2,424

)

 

 

(6,349

)

 

 

(6,253

)

 

 

(6,070

)

Interest expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

648

 

 

 

776

 

 

 

695

 

 

 

998

 

 

 

887

 

 

 

876

 

Other (income) expense, net

 

 

993

 

 

 

939

 

 

 

1,421

 

 

 

1,215

 

 

 

(187

)

 

 

(786

)

 

 

(1,002

)

 

 

(2,553

)

Income tax (benefit) expense

 

 

121

 

 

 

(33

)

 

 

(6,871

)

 

 

(297

)

 

 

(3,014

)

 

 

212

 

 

 

(12,300

)

 

 

(3,240

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

5,049

 

 

 

5,996

 

 

 

7,437

 

 

 

10,633

 

 

 

12,450

 

 

 

12,585

 

 

 

17,467

 

 

 

18,786

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

5,538

 

 

 

4,742

 

 

 

14,795

 

 

 

6,767

 

 

 

1,992,121

 

 

 

245,028

 

 

 

221,702

 

 

 

181,044

 

Payroll tax expense related to stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

132

 

 

 

53

 

 

 

20,953

 

 

 

(2,585

)

 

 

3,890

 

 

 

2,212

 

Spectacles inventory-related charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39,867

 

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

(93,234

)

 

$

(105,121

)

 

$

(108,604

)

 

$

(152,284

)

 

$

(188,243

)

 

$

(193,990

)

 

$

(178,901

)

 

$

(158,922

)


The following table presents a reconciliation of Free Cash Flow to net cash used in operating activities, the most comparable GAAP financial measure, for each of the periods presented:

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

March 31,

2016

 

 

June 30,

2016

 

 

September 30,

2016

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

March 31,

2017

 

 

June 30,

2017

 

 

September 30,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

June 30,

2018

 

 

September 30,

2018

 

 

December 31,

2018

 

 

March 31,

2019

 

 

June 30,

2019

 

 

September 30,

2019

 

 

December 31,

2019

 

 

(in thousands)

 

(in thousands)

 

Reconciliation of Free Cash Flow:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

$

(92,541

)

 

$

(134,110

)

 

$

(216,866

)

 

$

(167,728

)

 

$

(154,997

)

 

$

(209,574

)

 

$

(194,013

)

 

$

(176,083

)

$

(231,981

)

 

$

(199,346

)

 

$

(132,543

)

 

$

(126,054

)

 

$

(66,178

)

 

$

(95,789

)

 

$

(76,149

)

 

$

(66,842

)

Less:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property and equipment

 

 

(12,452

)

 

 

(16,421

)

 

 

(17,192

)

 

 

(20,376

)

 

 

(17,993

)

 

 

(19,365

)

 

 

(25,948

)

 

 

(21,212

)

 

(36,315

)

 

 

(34,901

)

 

 

(26,285

)

 

 

(22,741

)

 

 

(11,814

)

 

 

(7,633

)

 

 

(7,938

)

 

 

(9,093

)

Free Cash Flow

 

$

(104,993

)

 

$

(150,531

)

 

$

(234,058

)

 

$

(188,104

)

 

$

(172,990

)

 

$

(228,939

)

 

$

(219,961

)

 

$

(197,295

)

$

(268,296

)

 

$

(234,247

)

 

$

(158,828

)

 

$

(148,795

)

 

$

(77,992

)

 

$

(103,422

)

 

$

(84,087

)

 

$

(75,935

)


The following table presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net loss, the most comparable GAAP financial measure, for each of the periods presented:

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

June 30,

2018

 

 

September 30,

2018

 

 

December 31,

2018

 

 

March 31,

2019

 

 

June 30,

2019

 

 

September 30,

2019

 

 

December 31,

2019

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

$

(385,785

)

 

$

(353,310

)

 

$

(325,148

)

 

$

(191,668

)

 

$

(310,407

)

 

$

(255,174

)

 

$

(227,375

)

 

$

(240,704

)

Add (deduct):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

(6,104

)

 

 

(6,600

)

 

 

(7,011

)

 

 

(7,513

)

 

 

(7,816

)

 

 

(7,446

)

 

 

(10,317

)

 

 

(10,463

)

Interest expense

 

934

 

 

 

930

 

 

 

919

 

 

 

1,111

 

 

 

756

 

 

 

809

 

 

 

8,654

 

 

 

14,775

 

Other (income) expense, net

 

(3,153

)

 

 

61

 

 

 

7,625

 

 

 

3,715

 

 

 

1,127

 

 

 

(44,085

)

 

 

1,481

 

 

 

(17,536

)

Income tax (benefit) expense

 

1,578

 

 

 

1,077

 

 

 

244

 

 

 

(352

)

 

 

279

 

 

 

1,078

 

 

 

(1,296

)

 

 

332

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

21,553

 

 

 

22,514

 

 

 

24,898

 

 

 

22,682

 

 

 

23,319

 

 

 

22,660

 

 

 

20,646

 

 

 

20,620

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

133,258

 

 

 

156,371

 

 

 

126,809

 

 

 

121,772

 

 

 

162,556

 

 

 

195,574

 

 

 

161,228

 

 

 

166,655

 

Payroll tax expense related to stock-based compensation

 

9,968

 

 

 

5,997

 

 

 

3,947

 

 

 

2,015

 

 

 

6,737

 

 

 

7,871

 

 

 

4,604

 

 

 

8,628

 

Reduction in force charges

 

9,884

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lease exit charges

 

 

 

 

3,928

 

 

 

29,340

 

 

 

(2,125

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities class actions legal charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100,000

 

Adjusted EBITDA

$

(217,867

)

 

$

(169,032

)

 

$

(138,377

)

 

$

(50,363

)

 

$

(123,449

)

 

$

(78,713

)

 

$

(42,375

)

 

$

42,307

 

 

The following table sets forth the components of our unaudited quarterly consolidated statements of operations for each of the periods presented as a percentage of revenue:

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

March 31,

2016

 

 

June 30,

2016

 

 

September 30,

2016

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

March 31,

2017

 

 

June 30,

2017

 

 

September 30,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

(in thousands)

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

June 30,

2018

 

 

September 30,

2018

 

 

December 31,

2018

 

 

March 31,

2019

 

 

June 30,

2019

 

 

September 30,

2019

 

 

December 31,

2019

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of revenue

 

 

195

 

 

 

132

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

93

 

 

 

109

 

 

 

84

 

 

 

101

 

 

 

67

 

 

85

 

 

 

73

 

 

 

66

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

64

 

 

 

56

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

45

 

Research and development

 

 

72

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

538

 

 

 

141

 

 

 

115

 

 

 

82

 

 

87

 

 

 

77

 

 

 

68

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

67

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

39

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

38

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

147

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

39

 

 

44

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

22

 

General and administrative

 

 

62

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

785

 

 

 

73

 

 

 

57

 

 

 

39

 

 

53

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

38

 

Total costs and expenses

 

 

368

 

 

 

261

 

 

 

202

 

 

 

202

 

 

 

1,579

 

 

 

347

 

 

 

322

 

 

 

226

 

 

270

 

 

 

236

 

 

 

209

 

 

 

150

 

 

 

199

 

 

 

179

 

 

 

151

 

 

 

145

 

Loss from operations

 

 

268

 

 

 

161

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

1,479

 

 

 

247

 

 

 

222

 

 

 

126

 

Operating loss

 

170

 

 

 

136

 

 

 

109

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

99

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

45

 

Interest income

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

2

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

Interest expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

3

 

Other income (expense), net

 

 

3

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Loss before income taxes

 

 

269

 

 

 

161

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

103

 

 

 

1,478

 

 

 

244

 

 

 

219

 

 

 

124

 

 

167

 

 

 

134

 

 

 

109

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

97

 

 

 

65

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

43

 

Income tax benefit (expense)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

1

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

 

270

%

 

 

161

%

 

 

97

%

 

 

103

%

 

 

1476

%

 

 

244

%

 

 

213

%

 

 

123

%

 

167

%

 

 

135

%

 

 

109

%

 

 

49

%

 

 

97

%

 

 

66

%

 

 

51

%

 

 

43

%

 


Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities were $2.0$2.1 billion as of December 31, 2017,2019, primarily consisting of cash on deposit with banks and highly liquid investments in U.S. government and agency securities.securities, corporate debt securities, certificates of deposit, and commercial paper. Our primary source of liquidity is cash generated through financing activities. Our primary uses of cash include operating costs such as personnel-related expensescosts and the hostinginfrastructure costs of the Snapchat application, facility-related capital spending, and acquisitions and investments, and facility-related capital spending. Other than as noted below, thereinvestments. There are no known material subsequent events that could have a material impact on our cash or liquidity. We may contemplate and engage in merger and acquisition activity that could materially impact our liquidity and capital resource position.


In August 2019, we issued the Convertible Notes with an aggregate principal amount of $1.265 billion. The net proceeds from the issuance of the Convertible Notes were $1.15 billion, net of debt issuance costs and cash used to pay the costs of the capped call transactions, or the Capped Call Transactions. The Convertible Notes mature on August 1, 2026 unless repurchased, redeemed, or converted in accordance with their terms prior to such date. The Convertible Notes were not convertible as of December 31, 2019.

In July 2016, we entered into a five-year senior unsecured revolving credit facility, or the Credit Facility, with lenders some of which are affiliated with certain members of the underwriting syndicate for our IPO,Convertible Notes offering, that allows us to borrow up to $1.1 billion to fund working capital and general corporate-purpose expenditures. The loan bears interest at LIBORLIBO plus 0.75%, as well as an annual commitment fee of 0.10% on the daily undrawn balance of the facility. No origination fees were incurred at the closing of the Credit Facility. Any amounts outstanding under this facility will be due and payable in July 2021. In December 2016, the amount we are permitted to borrow under the Credit Facility was increased to $1.2 billion. As of December 31, 2017, no amounts were outstanding under the Credit Facility. In February 2018, the amount we are permitted to borrow under the Credit Facility was increased to $1.25 billion. In August 2018, we amended the Credit Facility to extend the term to August 2023 with respect to an aggregate of $1.05 billion of the $1.25 billion that we may borrow under the Credit Facility. In August 2019, we amended the Credit Facility to revise the covenants that restrict the repurchase of equity securities and the incurrence of indebtedness to permit the Capped Call Transactions and issuance of the Convertible Notes. As of December 31, 2019, no amounts were outstanding under the Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2019, we had $25.5 million in the form of outstanding standby letters of credit.

We believe our existing cash balance is sufficient to fund our ongoing working capital, investing, and financing requirements for at least the next 12 months. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors including our growth rate, headcount, sales and marketing activities, research and development efforts, the introduction of new features, products, and acquisitions, and continued user engagement. We continually evaluate opportunities to issue or repurchase equity or debt securities, obtain, retire, or restructure credit facilities or financing arrangements, or declare dividends for strategic reasons or to further strengthen our financial position.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, approximately 5%3% of our cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities was held outside the United States. These amounts were primarily held in the United Kingdom and are utilized to fund our foreign operations. Cash held outside the United States may be repatriated, subject to certain limitations, and would be available to be used to fund our domestic operations. However, repatriation of funds may result in additional tax liabilities. We believe our existing cash balance in the United States is sufficient to fund our working capital needs.

RSU Settlement

In connection with the vesting of employee RSUs and to satisfy tax withholding and remittance obligations, we remitted approximately $394.2 million through December 31, 2017. We withheld and remitted income taxes at applicable statutory rates based on the then-current value of the underlying shares. Beginning in November 2017, for a majority of employee RSUs, we sold a portion of the shares that vested on behalf of employees to satisfy tax withholding and remittance obligations. We will continue to evaluate the method of settlement of RSUs that vest in the future.

The following table sets forth the major components of our consolidated statements of cash flows for the periods presented:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

(in thousands)

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

$

(734,667

)

 

$

(611,245

)

 

$

(306,622

)

$

(304,958

)

 

$

(689,924

)

 

$

(734,667

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(1,346,739

)

 

 

(1,021,334

)

 

 

(100,942

)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

(728,608

)

 

 

694,454

 

 

 

(1,357,010

)

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

 

2,265,348

 

 

 

1,141,890

 

 

 

650,366

 

 

1,165,852

 

 

 

47,437

 

 

 

2,265,348

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash

 

$

183,942

 

 

$

(490,689

)

 

$

242,802

 

Change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

$

132,286

 

 

$

51,967

 

 

$

173,671

 

Free Cash Flow (1)

 

$

(819,185

)

 

$

(677,686

)

 

$

(325,827

)

$

(341,436

)

 

$

(810,166

)

 

$

(819,185

)

 

(1)

For information on how we define and calculate Free Cash Flow and a reconciliation to net cash used in operating activities to Free Cash Flow, see “Selected Financial DataNon-GAAP Financial Measures.”


Net Cash Used in Operating Activities

20172019 compared to 20162018

Net cash used in operating activities increased $123.4 milliondecreased $385.0 in the year ended December 31, 20172019 compared to the same period in 2016.2018. Net cash used in operating activities was $734.7$305.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, resulting primarily from net loss, adjusted for non-cash items, primarilyincluding stock-based compensation expense of $2.6 billion. Additionally, the increase was driven by a $104.4$686.0 million, increase in accounts receivable related to an increase in advertising revenue,and depreciation and amortization expense of $87.2 million, partially offset by a $101.0$39.9 million increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities primarily driven by an increase in accrued hosting costs and accrued compensation costs due to increased headcount.

2016 compared to 2015

Net cash used in operating activities increased $304.6 million ingain on the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015.divestiture of Placed. Net cash used in operating activities was $611.2also driven by a $147.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, resulting primarily from net loss, adjusted for non-cash items, and an increase in the accounts receivable of $118.4 million relatedbalance due to an increase in advertising revenue.revenue, partially offset by an increase in accrued expenses and other current liabilities of $146.1 million primarily due to the securities class actions legal charges and the timing of payments.


Net Cash Used inProvided by (Used in) Investing Activities

20172019 compared to 20162018

Net cash used in investing activities was $1.3 billion$728.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, an increase2019, compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $325.4$694.5 million compared tofor the same period in 2016,2018. Our investing activities in the current period consisted primarily due to the use of $3.9 billion for the purchase of marketable securities and cash paid for acquisitions of $386.0 million,$2.5 billion, partially offset by cash provided by the sales and maturities of marketable securities of $3.0$1.8 billion.

2016 compared to 2015

Net cash used inprovided by investing activities was $1.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2016, an increase of $920.4 million compared toin the prior period primarily due to the useconsisted of $1.6 billion for the purchase of marketable securities and $104.0 million for business acquisitions, partially offset by cash provided by the sales and maturities of marketable securities of $728.6 million.$2.5 billion, partially offset by the purchase of marketable securities of $1.7 billion.

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities

20172019 compared to 20162018

Net cash provided by financing activities was $2.3$1.2 billion and $1.1 billion for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Our financing activities in 2017 consisted of the issuance of Class A common stock in our IPO of $2.7 billion, net of underwriting commissions, partially offset by cash used for minimum tax withholdings on behalf of our employees of $394.2 million in connection with vesting RSUs during the year ended December 31, 2017.

2016 compared to 2015

Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.1 billion and $650.4$47.4 million for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively. Our financing activities in the current period consisted primarily of net proceeds of $1.15 billion from the issuance of the Convertible Notes and the purchase of the Capped Calls. Net cash provided by financing activities in the prior periods consisted of preferredproceeds from the exercise of stock issuances.options.

Free Cash Flow

20172019 compared to 20162018

Free Cash Flow was $(819.2)$(341.4) million and $(677.7)$(810.2) million for the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively, and was composed of net cash used in operating activities, resulting primarily from net loss, adjusted for non-cash items and changes in working capital. Free Cash Flow also included purchases of property and equipment of $84.5$36.5 million and $66.4$120.2 million for the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016, respectively.

2016 compared to 2015

Free Cash Flow was $(677.7) million and $(325.8) million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and was composed of net cash used in operating activities, resulting primarily from net loss, adjusted for non-cash items and changes in working capital. Free Cash Flow also included purchases of property and equipment of $66.4 million and $19.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015,2018, respectively.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements for any of the periods presented.

Contingencies

We are involved in claims, lawsuits, indirect and other tax matters, government investigations, and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. We record a provision for a liability when we believe that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. We also disclose material contingencies when we believe that a loss is not probable but reasonably possible. Significant judgment is required to determine both probability and the estimated amount. Such claims, suits, and proceedings are inherently unpredictable and subject to significant uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control. Many of these legal and tax contingencies can take years to resolve. Should any of these estimates and assumptions change or prove to be incorrect, it could have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position, and cash flows.


Commitments

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2017:2019:

 

 

Total

 

 

1 Year

(2018)

 

 

2-4 Years

(2019 and 2020)

 

 

4-6 Years

(2021 and 2022)

 

 

After 6

Years

(Thereafter)

 

Total

 

 

1 Year

(2020)

 

 

2-3 Years

(2021 and 2022)

 

 

4-5 Years

(2023 and 2024)

 

 

After 5

Years

(Thereafter)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

(in thousands)

 

Operating leases

 

$

420,002

 

 

$

49,649

 

 

$

119,989

 

 

$

105,924

 

 

$

144,440

 

Financing leases

 

 

45,513

 

 

 

4,726

 

 

 

9,743

 

 

 

10,259

 

 

 

20,785

 

Hosting commitments

 

 

2,577,139

 

 

 

518,806

 

 

 

1,275,000

 

 

 

783,333

 

 

 

 

$

1,672,420

 

 

$

610,087

 

 

$

1,062,333

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Lease commitments

 

13,788

 

 

 

689

 

 

 

4,065

 

 

 

6,129

 

 

 

2,905

 

Other commitments

 

 

19,380

 

 

 

14,898

 

 

 

4,482

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39,487

 

 

 

30,870

 

 

 

6,637

 

 

 

1,766

 

 

 

214

 

Total contractual commitments

 

$

3,062,034

 

 

$

588,079

 

 

$

1,409,214

 

 

$

899,516

 

 

$

165,225

 

$

1,725,695

 

 

$

641,646

 

 

$

1,073,035

 

 

$

7,895

 

 

$

3,119

 

 

For additional discussion on our operating and financing leases and data hosting and other purchase commitments, see Note 68 to our consolidated financial statements included in “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In 2018, we will exit various operating leases prior to the end of the contractual lease term, primarily as a result of moving to a centralized corporate office located in Santa Monica, California. As of December 31, 2017, these leases have a remaining contractual obligation of approximately $85.0 million. We expect to incur losses, which may be substantial, related to exiting these leases on our cease use date. We are pursuing options to mitigate our exit costs, including subleasing these properties.

In January 2017, we entered into the Google Cloud Platform License Agreement, which was amended in September 2017 and again in December 2017.Agreement. Under the agreement, we were granted a license to access and use certain cloud services. The agreement has an initial term of five years and we are required to purchase at least $400.0 million of cloud services in each year of the agreement. For each of the first four years, up to 15% of this amount may be moved to a subsequent year. If we fail to meet the minimum purchase commitment during any year, we are required to pay the difference.

In March 2016, we entered into the AWS Enterprise Agreement for the use of cloud services from Amazon Web Services, Inc., or AWS, which was amended in March 2016 and again in February 2017. The agreement will continue indefinitely until terminated by either party. Under the February 2017 addendum to the agreement, we We are committed to spend $1.0an aggregate of $1.1 billion between January 2017 and December 20212022 on AWS services ($50.0 million in 2017, $125.090.0 million in 2018, $200.0$150.0 million in 2019, $275.0$215.0 million in 2020, and $350.0$280.0 million in 2021)2021, and $349.0 million in 2022). If we fail to meet the minimum purchase commitment during any year, we are required to pay the difference. Any such payment may be applied to future use of AWS services during the addendum term, although it will not count towards meeting the future minimum purchase commitments under the addendum.

We also have various other non-cancelable contractual commitments related to purchase agreements. During the third quarter of 2017, based on management’s updated assessment, we recorded $39.9 million of charges related to Spectacles inventory. The charges were primarily related to excess inventory reserves and inventory purchase commitment cancellation charges. As of December 31, 2017, there were no material hardware inventory commitments.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We prepare our financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Preparing these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses, and related disclosures. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our estimates are based on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Our actual results could differ from these estimates.

The critical accounting estimates, assumptions, and judgments that we believe to have the most significant impact on our consolidated financial statements are described below.

Revenue Recognition

We generate the majoritysubstantially all of our revenue through the delivery of advertisements. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the services have been provided or delivered, the fees are fixed or determinable, and collectabilitycontrol of the related receivablepromised goods or services is reasonably assured.transferred to our customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to receive in exchange for those goods or services. These arrangements are either on a fixed-fee


basis over a period of time or based on the number of advertising impressions delivered. Revenue related to agreements based on the number of impressions delivered is recognized when the advertisement is displayed. Revenue related to fixed fee arrangements is recognized ratably over the service period, typically less than 30 days in duration, and such arrangements do not contain minimum impression guarantees.

Snap Ads may be subject to revenue sharing arrangements between us and the content partner. If a revenue share payment is owed to a content partner related to Snap-sold revenue, we recognize that payment as cost of revenue. Under revenue share arrangements with our content partners, we pay a portion of the advertising revenue generated from the display of Snap-sold advertisements in the content partner’s Publisher Stories. These arrangements generally do not contain minimum financial commitments to our publisher partners and are generally not tied to specific events or promotions.


Currently, our Sponsored Creative Tools and measurement services are only Snap-sold and are not subject to revenue sharesharing arrangements. Snap-sold revenue is recognized based on the gross amount that we charge the advertiser. Partner-sold revenue is recognized based on the net amount of revenue we receiveto be received from the content partner.partners.

There is significant judgment in accounting for these arrangements related to whether we should report revenue based on the gross amount that we charge the advertiser or the net amount of revenue received from the content partner. To determine if we should report revenue on a gross or net basis, we assess whether we are acting as the principal or agent in the transaction. If we are acting as the principal, we record revenue on a gross basis. If we are acting as the agent, we record revenue on a net basis. We evaluate all of the indicators in the guidance to make this determination. While no one indicatorwhich party is determinative, we place the most weight on the analysis of whether we are the primary obligor.obligor responsible for fulfilling advertising delivery, including the acceptability of services delivered.

We reportrecognize Snap-sold revenue on a gross basis predominantly because we are the primary obligor responsible for fulfilling the advertisement delivery, and maintaining the relationship with the advertiser, including the acceptability of the services delivered. For Snap-sold advertising, we enter into contractual arrangements directly with advertisers. We are directly responsible for the fulfillment of the contractual terms and any remedy for issues with such fulfillment. For Snap-sold revenue, we also establish pricinghave latitude in establishing the selling price with the advertiser, and have discretion in supplier selection givenas we can choose where to place the advertisement on available inventory acrosssell advertisements at a rate determined at our platform. sole discretion.

We reportrecognize partner-sold revenue on a net basis predominantly because the content partner, and not us, is the primary obligor responsible for fulfillment, and maintaining the relationship with the advertiser, including the acceptability of the services delivered. TheIn partner-sold advertising arrangements, the content partner also has a direct contractual relationship with the advertiser. There is no contractual relationship between us and the advertiser for partner-sold transactions. When a content partner sells advertisements, the content partner is responsible for fulfilling the advertisements, and accordingly, we have determined the content partner is the primary obligor. Additionally, we do not have any latitude in establishing the selling price with the advertiser and has discretion in supplier selection.for partner-sold advertising. The content partner may sell advertisements at a rate determined at its sole discretion. For the periods presented, partner-sold revenue was not material.

Stock-Based Compensation

In the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, total stock-based compensation expense recognized was $2.6 billion.$686.0 million. We have granted stock-based awards consisting primarily of restricted stock units, or RSUs, restricted stock awards, or RSAs, and to a lesser extent, stock options to employees, members of our board of directors, and non-employee advisors. The substantial majority of our stock-based awards have been made to employees. RSUs granted before January 1, 2017, or Pre-2017 RSUs, included both service-based and performance conditions to vest in the underlying common stock. The service-based condition for the majority of these awards is satisfied over four years. The performance condition related to these awards was satisfied on the effectiveness of the registration statement for our IPO, which occurred in March 2017. On the effectiveness of the registration statement for our IPO, we recognized $1.3 billion in stock-based compensation expense. All RSUs granted after December 31, 2016, or Post-2017 RSUs, vest on the satisfaction of only service-based conditions. The service condition for RSUs granted prior to February 2018 is generally satisfied over four years, 10% after the first year of service, 20% over the second year, 30% over the third year, and 40% over the fourth year. The service condition for RSUs and RSAs granted after February 2018 is generally satisfied in equal monthly or quarterly installments over four years.

We account for stock-based employee compensation under the fair value recognition and measurement provisions, in accordance with applicable accounting standards, which requires stock-based awards to be measured based on the grant date fair value. Stock-based compensation expense is recorded net of estimated forfeitures in our consolidated statements of operations. Accordingly, stock-based compensation expense is only recorded for those potential stock-based awards that we expect to vest. We estimate the forfeiture rate based onusing historical forfeitures of equity awards and adjust the rate to reflectother expected changes in facts and circumstances, if any. We will revisere-evaluate our estimated forfeiture rate if actual forfeitures differ from our initial estimates. A modification of the terms of a stock-based award is treated as an exchange of the original award for a new award with total compensation cost equal to the grant-date fair value of the original award plus the incremental value of the modification to the award.


Restricted Stock Units

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we have approximately $620.0$34.5 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to Pre-2017 RSUs to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.50.8 years. Total unrecognized compensation cost related to Post-2017 RSUs was $809.5 million$1.4 billion as of December 31, 20172019 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 4.22.9 years.


Restricted Stock Awards

As of December 31, 2019, we have approximately $74.2 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to RSAs to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 3.3 years.

CEO Award

In addition, onOn the closing of the IPO, our CEO received the CEO award for 37.4 million shares of Series FP preferred stock, which automatically converted into an equivalent number of shares of Class C common stock on the closing of the IPO. The CEO award represented 3.0% of all outstanding shares on the closing of the IPO, including shares sold by us in the IPO and vested stock options and RSUs on the closing of the IPO, net of shares withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations. The CEO award vested immediately on the closing of the IPO, and such shares will beare being delivered to the CEO in equal quarterly installments over three years beginningwhich began in November 2017. In November 2017, 3,120,651As of December 31, 2019, 28.1 million shares subject to the CEO award werehave been delivered to the CEO, and 2,392,629 of such shares were sold on his behalf to cover tax withholding obligations.CEO. In the three months ended March 31, 2017, the stock-based compensation expense recognized related to the CEO award was $636.6 million, which is based on the vesting of 37.4 million shares of Class C common stock, at the initial public offering price of $17.00 per share.

Stock Options

Total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options was $35.7 million and $48.6 million as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense for stock options granted to employees is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, based on the estimated grant-date fair value, calculated under the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

The Black-Scholes model includes subjective assumptions, including the fair value of our common stock, expected term of the option, expected volatility, risk free rate, and expected dividend yield. These assumptions involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. If factors change and different assumptions are used, our stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future.

In the year ended December 31, 2017, we granted and assumed options with an aggregate grant date fair value of $41.1 million. The weighted-average assumptions used to determine the fair value of employee stock options granted and assumed during the year ended December 31, 2017 were as follows:

Expected term from grant date (in years)

 

 

3.0

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

 

1.9

%

Expected volatility

 

 

51

%

Dividend yield

 

 

0

%

Strike price

 

$

13.62

 

The weighted-average fair value of employee stock options granted and assumed during the year ended December 31, 2017 was $5.84 per share.

Business Combinations and Valuation of Goodwill and Other Acquired Intangible Assets

We estimate the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Goodwill as of the acquisition date is measured as the excess of consideration transferred over the net of the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. While we use our best estimates and assumptions to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date, our estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement.

Significant estimates in valuing certain intangible assets include, but are not limited to, future expected cash flows from acquired technology, useful lives, and discount rates. Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we have made in the past have been reasonable and appropriate, they are based in part on historical experience and information obtained from the management of the acquired companies and are inherently uncertain. During the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill. On the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to our consolidated statements of operations.

Convertible Notes

We account for the Convertible Notes as separate liability and equity components. The carrying amount of the liability component is calculated by measuring the fair value of a similar liability that does not have an associated convertible feature. The carrying amount of the equity component representing the conversion option is calculated by deducting the fair value of the liability component from the principal amount of the Convertible Notes as a whole. We estimated the fair value of the liability and equity components using a convertible bond model, which includes subjective assumptions such as the expected term, expected volatility, and the interest rate of a similar non-convertible debt instrument. These assumptions involve inherent uncertainties and management judgement.

Loss Contingencies

We are involved in claims, lawsuits, tax matters, government investigations, and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. We record a provision for a liability when we believe that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. When there appears to be a range of possible costs with equal likelihood, a liability is recorded based on the low-end of such range. However, the likelihood of a loss is often difficult to predict and determining a meaningful estimate of the loss or a range of loss may not be practicable based on the information available, the potential effect of future events, and decisions by third parties impacting the ultimate resolution of the contingency. It is also not uncommon for such matters to be resolved over multiple reporting periods. During this time, relevant developments and new information must be continuously evaluated to determine both the likelihood of potential loss and whether it is possible to reasonably estimate a range of potential loss. We also disclose material contingencies when we believe that a loss is reasonably possible.


Significant judgment is required to determine both probability and the estimated amounts of loss contingencies. Such claims, suits, and proceedings are inherently unpredictable and subject to significant uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control. Should any of these estimates and assumptions change, it could have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position, and cash flows.

Income Taxes

We are subject to income taxes in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our uncertain tax positions.


We recognize tax benefits from uncertain tax positions only if we believe that it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. Although we believe that we have adequately reserved for our uncertain tax positions, we can provide no assurance that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be materially different. We make adjustments to these reserves when facts and circumstances change, such as the closing of a tax audit or the refinement of an estimate. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences may affect the provision for income taxes in the period in which such determination is made and could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included in “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for recently adopted accounting pronouncements and recently issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are exposed to market risks in the ordinary course of our business. These risks primarily include interest rate risk and foreign currency risk as follows:

Interest Rate Risk

We had cash and cash equivalents totaling $334.1$520.3 million and $150.1$387.1 million at December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2016,2018, respectively. We had marketable securities totaling $1.7$1.6 billion and $837.2$891.9 million at December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2016,2018, respectively. Our cash and cash equivalents consist of cash in bank accounts and marketable securities consistconsisting of U.S. government debt and agency securities.securities, corporate debt securities, certificates of deposit, and commercial paper. The primary objectives of our investment activities are to preserve principal and provide liquidity without significantly increasing risk. We do not enter into investments for trading or speculative purposes. Due to the relatively short-term nature of our investment portfolio, a hypothetical 100 basis point change in interest rates would not have a material effect on the fair value of our portfolio for the periods presented.

In August 2019, we issued Convertible Notes with an aggregate principal amount of $1.265 billion. We carry the Convertible Notes at face value less the unamortized debt discount and issuance costs on our consolidated balance sheets. The Convertible Notes have a fixed interest rate; therefore, we have no financial statement risk associated with changes in interest rates with respect to the Convertible Notes. The fair value of the Convertible Notes changes when the market price of our stock fluctuates or market interest rates change.

Foreign Currency Risk

For all periods presented, the majority of our sales and operating expenses were denominated in U.S. dollars. We therefore have not had material foreign currency risk associated with sales and cost-based activities. The functional currency of our material operating entities is the U.S. dollar.

For the periods presented, our operations outside of the United States are not considered material and incur a majority of their operating expenses in foreign currencies. Therefore, our results of operations and cash flows are minimally subject to fluctuations from changes in foreign currency rates. We believe the exposure to foreign currency fluctuation from operating expenses is immaterial at this time as the related costs do not constitute a significant portion of our total expenses. As we grow operations, our exposure to foreign currency risk will likely become more significant.

For any of the periods presented, we did not enter into any foreign currency exchange contracts. We do,may, however, anticipate enteringenter into foreign currency exchange contracts for purposes of hedging foreign exchange rate fluctuations on our business operations in future operating periods as our exposures are deemed to be material. For additional discussion on foreign currency risk, see “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

SNAP INC.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

ReportReports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

6460

 

 

 

Consolidated Financial Statements:

 

 

Consolidated Balance SheetsStatements of Cash Flows

64

Consolidated Statements of Operations

 

65

 

 

 

Consolidated Statements of OperationsComprehensive Income (Loss)

 

66

 

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)Balance Sheets

 

67

 

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

 

68

 

 

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Cash Flows

 

70

 

 

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

71

The supplementary financial information required by this Item 8 is included in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsUnaudited Quarterly Results of Operations Data,” which is incorporated herein by reference.

 


Report of Independent RegisteredRegistered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Snap Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Snap Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016, and2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial“consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company at December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 4, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB)PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Revenue Recognition

Description of the Matter

As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company generates substantially all of its revenues by offering various advertising products on Snapchat. The substantial majority of advertising revenues is generated based upon contractual agreements with customers on a fixed fee for advertisements delivered over a period of time, or fees based on the number of advertising impressions delivered. Revenue related to fixed fee agreements is recognized ratably over the service period while revenue related to agreements based on the number of impressions delivered is recognized when the advertisement is displayed.


The Company’s revenue recognition process utilizes multiple, complex, proprietary systems and tools for the initiation, processing and recording of transactions which includes a high volume of individually low monetary value transactions. This process is dependent on the effective design and operation of multiple systems, processes, data sources and controls which required significant audit effort. Also, the identification and evaluation of certain non-standard terms and conditions required incremental audit effort to determine the distinct performance obligations and the timing of revenue recognition.  

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit

We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over the identification and evaluation of revenue recognition for standard and non-standard terms and conditions.  With the support of our information technology professionals, we identified and tested the relevant systems and tools used for the determination of initiation, delivery, recording and billing of revenue, which included processes and controls related to access to the relevant systems and data, changes to the relevant systems and interfaces, and configuration of the relevant systems.

Among other procedures, to test the Company’s recognition of revenue, we tested the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data within the Company’s billing systems, by agreeing amounts recognized to contractual terms and conditions, and tested revenue recognized to accounts receivables and cash receipts.  Additionally, we examined standard customer online terms and conditions to understand the distinct performance obligations and tested the timing of revenue recognition.  Further, we selected a sample of non-standard contractual arrangements to understand the performance obligations and the timing of revenue recognition. To assess completeness of non-standard terms and conditions, we obtained confirmations of terms and conditions for a sample of customers.

Convertible Notes

Description of the Matter

As described in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, in August 2019 the Company issued $1.265 billion of convertible senior notes due in 2026 (Convertible Notes), which permits the Company to settle in cash or stock at its option.  The Company entered into separate capped call transactions to reduce potential dilution upon conversion of the Convertible Notes.  These transactions are collectively referred to as the Convertible Notes Transactions.    

Auditing the Company’s accounting for the Convertible Notes Transactions was complex due to the significant judgment required in determining the liability component of the Convertible Notes as well as the balance sheet classification of the elements of the Convertible Notes.  The Company estimated the fair value of the liability component of the Convertible Notes, absent any embedded conversion features, using a discounted cash flow model with a risk adjusted yield.  In estimating the risk adjusted yield, the Company utilized both an income and market approach.  For the income approach, the Company used a convertible bond pricing model, which included several assumptions including estimates of the Company’s equity volatility, dividend yield and a market risk free rate.  For the market approach, the Company performed an evaluation of comparable issuances of debt securities issued by companies with a similar credit risk rating to determine the fair value of the liability component.  Additionally, the Company performed a detailed analysis of the terms of the Convertible Notes Transactions to identify whether any derivatives that required separate mark-to-market accounting under applicable accounting guidance were present.

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit

We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s Convertible Notes Transactions. For example, we tested the Company’s controls over the initial recognition and measurement of the Convertible Notes Transactions, including the recording of the associated liability and equity components.  

Our testing of the Company’s initial accounting for the Convertible Notes Transactions, among other procedures, included reading the underlying agreements and evaluating the Company’s accounting analysis of the initial accounting of the Convertible Notes Transactions, including the determination of the balance sheet classification of each transaction and identification of any derivatives included in the arrangements.


Our testing of the fair value of the liability component, included, among other procedures, evaluating the Company’s selection of the valuation methodology and significant assumptions used by the Company, and evaluating the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data supporting the significant assumptions and estimates. Specifically, when assessing the key assumptions, we evaluated the appropriateness of the Company’s estimates of its credit risk, volatility, dividend yield and the market risk free rate as well as its analysis of comparable issuances of debt securities by companies with a similar credit risk rating. In addition, we involved a valuation specialist to assist in our evaluation of the methodology used by the Company and the appropriateness of significant assumptions.

Accounting for Loss Contingencies

Description of the Matter

As described in Note 8 to the financial statements, the Company is involved in various claims and legal proceedings. The Company accrues a liability for an estimated loss if the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is considered probable, and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The Company also performs an assessment of the materiality of loss contingencies where a loss is either reasonably possible or it is reasonably possible that an exposure to loss exists in excess of the amount accrued. If it is reasonably possible that such a loss or an additional loss may have been incurred and the effect on the financial statements is material, the Company discloses the nature of the loss contingency and an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made within the notes to the financial statements.

Auditing management’s determination of whether a loss is probable and reasonably estimable, reasonably possible or remote, and the related disclosures, is highly subjective and requires significant judgment.  In particular, these determinations are sensitive to the uncertainties related to the ultimate outcome of the legal contingency, the status and uncertainty of the litigation and/or the appeals process, the jurisdiction where the lawsuit has been filed, the extent of recovery of losses from insurers, and the status of any settlement discussions associated with the legal contingency.

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit

We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of the controls related to the Company’s process for recognition, measurement and disclosure of legal contingencies.

To test the Company’s legal contingencies, we assessed the completeness of the legal contingencies subject to evaluation by the Company, and assessed the Company’s determination of the probability of outcomes for legal contingencies through inspection of responses to inquiry letters sent to both internal and external legal counsel, discussions with internal and external legal counsel to confirm our understanding of the allegations, and obtained written representations from executives of the Company.

For those legal contingencies for which the Company has determined that a loss is probable and reasonably estimable and is therefore required to be recognized, we evaluated the measurement of the recorded loss. For those legal contingencies for which the Company has determined that a loss is either probable or reasonably possible, but the Company is unable to estimate the range of loss, and is therefore required to be disclosed, we assessed the sufficiency of the disclosures of legal contingencies.   We assessed the Company’s estimate of the amount of the loss, for both contingencies that are probable and reasonably possible, through inspection of correspondence received from internal and external legal counsel, direct discussions with internal and external legal counsel, inspection of court rulings, inspection of settlement agreements, and evaluated the extent of recovery of losses from insurers. We also obtained written representations from executives of the Company.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2016.

Los Angeles, California

February 21, 20184, 2020


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Snap Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Snap Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Snap Inc. (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes and our report dated February 4, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Los Angeles, California

February 4, 2020


Snap Inc.

Consolidated Balance SheetsStatements of Cash Flows

(in thousands, except per share amounts)thousands)

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

334,063

 

 

$

150,121

 

Marketable securities

 

 

1,708,976

 

 

 

837,247

 

Accounts receivable, net of allowance

 

 

279,473

 

 

 

162,659

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

44,282

 

 

 

29,958

 

Total current assets

 

 

2,366,794

 

 

 

1,179,985

 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

166,762

 

 

 

100,585

 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

166,473

 

 

 

75,982

 

Goodwill

 

 

639,882

 

 

 

319,137

 

Other assets

 

 

81,655

 

 

 

47,103

 

Total assets

 

$

3,421,566

 

 

$

1,722,792

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

71,194

 

 

$

8,419

 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 

 

275,062

 

 

 

148,325

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

346,256

 

 

 

156,744

 

Other liabilities

 

 

82,983

 

 

 

47,134

 

Total liabilities

 

 

429,239

 

 

 

203,878

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Convertible voting preferred stock, Series A, A-1, and B, $0.00001 par value.

   No shares and 146,962 shares authorized, issued, and outstanding at

   December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Liquidation

   preference of $95,175 at December 31, 2016.

 

 

 

 

1

 

Convertible non-voting preferred stock, Series C, $0.00001 par value. No shares

   and 16,000 shares authorized, issued, and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and

   December 31, 2016, respectively. Liquidation preference of $54,543 at

   December 31, 2016.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Convertible non-voting preferred stock, Series D, E, and F, $0.00001 par value. No

   shares and 83,851 shares authorized, issued, and outstanding at December 31,

   2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

Series FP convertible voting preferred stock, $0.00001 par value. No shares

   and 260,888 shares authorized at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016,

   respectively. No shares and 215,888 shares issued and outstanding at

   December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

Class A non-voting common stock, $0.00001 par value. 3,000,000 shares

   authorized, 883,022 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017,

   and 1,500,000 shares authorized, 504,902 shares issued and outstanding at

   December 31, 2016.

 

 

9

 

 

 

5

 

Class B voting common stock, $0.00001 par value. 700,000 shares authorized,

   122,564 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017, and 1,500,000

  shares authorized, 31,469 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016.

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

Class C voting common stock, $0.00001 par value. 260,888 shares authorized,

   216,616 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017, and 260,888

  shares authorized and no shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016.

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

7,634,825

 

 

 

2,728,823

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

14,157

 

 

 

(2,057

)

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(4,656,667

)

 

 

(1,207,862

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

2,992,327

 

 

 

1,518,914

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

3,421,566

 

 

$

1,722,792

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Cash flows from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

$

(1,033,660

)

 

$

(1,255,911

)

 

$

(3,445,066

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

87,245

 

 

 

91,648

 

 

 

61,288

 

Stock-based compensation

 

686,013

 

 

 

538,211

 

 

 

2,639,895

 

Deferred income taxes

 

(491

)

 

 

(383

)

 

 

(17,490

)

Gain on divestiture

 

(39,883

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs

 

17,797

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lease exit charges

 

 

 

 

33,033

 

 

 

 

Excess inventory reserve and related asset impairment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,997

 

Other

 

(28,575

)

 

 

(903

)

 

 

(6,356

)

Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable, net of allowance

 

(147,862

)

 

 

(77,506

)

 

 

(104,357

)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

(9,849

)

 

 

1,594

 

 

 

(39,783

)

Operating lease right-of-use assets

 

58,199

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

1,169

 

 

 

21,785

 

 

 

(4,771

)

Accounts payable

 

20,674

 

 

 

(33,532

)

 

 

49,696

 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 

146,063

 

 

 

(14,325

)

 

 

100,988

 

Operating lease liabilities

 

(60,844

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

(954

)

 

 

6,365

 

 

 

9,292

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

(304,958

)

 

 

(689,924

)

 

 

(734,667

)

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property and equipment

 

(36,478

)

 

 

(120,242

)

 

 

(84,518

)

Sales of property and equipment

 

 

 

 

11,276

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from divestiture, net

 

73,796

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired

 

(77,119

)

 

 

(815

)

 

 

(386,011

)

Non-marketable investments

 

(5,481

)

 

 

(22,495

)

 

 

(10,030

)

Purchases of marketable securities

 

(2,477,388

)

 

 

(1,653,918

)

 

 

(3,862,637

)

Sales of marketable securities

 

184,179

 

 

 

45,007

 

 

 

511,068

 

Maturities of marketable securities

 

1,608,854

 

 

 

2,438,206

 

 

 

2,483,225

 

Other

 

1,029

 

 

 

(2,565

)

 

 

(8,107

)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

(728,608

)

 

 

694,454

 

 

 

(1,357,010

)

Cash flows from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes, net of issuance costs

 

1,251,411

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase of capped calls

 

(102,086

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from the exercise of stock options

 

16,527

 

 

 

47,988

 

 

 

11,379

 

Stock repurchases from employees for tax withholdings

 

 

 

 

(551

)

 

 

(394,156

)

Proceeds from issuance of Class A common stock in initial public offering, net

   of underwriting commissions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,657,797

 

Payments of deferred offering costs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9,672

)

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

1,165,852

 

 

 

47,437

 

 

 

2,265,348

 

Change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

 

132,286

 

 

 

51,967

 

 

 

173,671

 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, beginning of period

 

388,974

 

 

 

337,007

 

 

 

163,336

 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, end of period

$

521,260

 

 

$

388,974

 

 

$

337,007

 

Supplemental disclosures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for income taxes, net

$

156

 

 

$

3,598

 

 

$

6,226

 

Supplemental disclosures of non-cash activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net change in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities related to property and equipment additions

$

(6,027

)

 

$

(7,764

)

 

$

13,139

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Snap Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Revenue

 

$

824,949

 

 

$

404,482

 

 

$

58,663

 

$

1,715,534

 

 

$

1,180,446

 

 

$

824,949

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of revenue

 

 

717,462

 

 

 

451,660

 

 

 

182,341

 

 

895,838

 

 

 

798,865

 

 

 

717,462

 

Research and development

 

 

1,534,863

 

 

 

183,676

 

 

 

82,235

 

 

883,509

 

 

 

772,185

 

 

 

1,534,863

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

522,605

 

 

 

124,371

 

 

 

27,216

 

 

458,598

 

 

 

400,824

 

 

 

522,605

 

General and administrative

 

 

1,535,595

 

 

 

165,160

 

 

 

148,600

 

 

580,917

 

 

 

477,022

 

 

 

1,535,595

 

Total costs and expenses

 

 

4,310,525

 

 

 

924,867

 

 

 

440,392

 

 

2,818,862

 

 

 

2,448,896

 

 

 

4,310,525

 

Loss from operations

 

 

(3,485,576

)

 

 

(520,385

)

 

 

(381,729

)

Operating loss

 

(1,103,328

)

 

 

(1,268,450

)

 

 

(3,485,576

)

Interest income

 

 

21,096

 

 

 

4,654

 

 

 

1,399

 

 

36,042

 

 

 

27,228

 

 

 

21,096

 

Interest expense

 

 

(3,456

)

 

 

(1,424

)

 

 

 

 

(24,994

)

 

 

(3,894

)

 

 

(3,456

)

Other income (expense), net

 

 

4,528

 

 

 

(4,568

)

 

 

(152

)

 

59,013

 

 

 

(8,248

)

 

 

4,528

 

Loss before income taxes

 

 

(3,463,408

)

 

 

(521,723

)

 

 

(380,482

)

 

(1,033,267

)

 

 

(1,253,364

)

 

 

(3,463,408

)

Income tax benefit (expense)

 

 

18,342

 

 

 

7,080

 

 

 

7,589

 

 

(393

)

 

 

(2,547

)

 

 

18,342

 

Net loss

 

$

(3,445,066

)

 

$

(514,643

)

 

$

(372,893

)

$

(1,033,660

)

 

$

(1,255,911

)

 

$

(3,445,066

)

Net loss per share attributable to Class A, Class B, and Class C common stockholders (Note 2):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss per share attributable to Class A, Class B, and Class C

common stockholders (Note 3):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

(2.95

)

 

$

(0.64

)

 

$

(0.51

)

$

(0.75

)

 

$

(0.97

)

 

$

(2.95

)

Diluted

 

$

(2.95

)

 

$

(0.64

)

 

$

(0.51

)

$

(0.75

)

 

$

(0.97

)

 

$

(2.95

)

Weighted average shares used in computation of net loss per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

1,375,462

 

 

 

1,300,568

 

 

 

1,166,085

 

Diluted

 

1,375,462

 

 

 

1,300,568

 

 

 

1,166,085

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 


Snap Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Net loss

 

$

(3,445,066

)

 

$

(514,643

)

 

$

(372,893

)

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities, net of tax

 

 

(1,122

)

 

 

44

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

17,336

 

 

 

(2,101

)

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

 

16,214

 

 

 

(2,057

)

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income (loss)

 

$

(3,428,852

)

 

$

(516,700

)

 

$

(372,893

)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Snap Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(in thousands)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

Convertible voting preferred stock—Series A, A-1, and B

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

 

146,962

 

 

$

1

 

 

 

146,962

 

 

$

1

 

 

 

146,962

 

 

$

1

 

Conversion of Series A, A-1, and B to Class B voting common stock

 

 

(146,962

)

 

 

(1

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, end of period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

146,962

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

146,962

 

 

 

1

 

Convertible non-voting preferred stock—Series C

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

��

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

 

16,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,000

 

 

 

 

Conversion of Series C to Class B voting common stock

 

 

(16,000

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, end of period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,000

 

 

 

 

Convertible non-voting preferred stock—Series D, E, and F

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

 

83,851

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

44,555

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

23,351

 

 

 

 

Issuance of Series F non-voting preferred stock, net of issuance costs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

37,668

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

21,204

 

 

 

1

 

Exchange of Series FP voting preferred stock for Series F non-voting preferred stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,628

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion of Series D, E, and F to Class B voting common stock

 

 

(83,851

)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, end of period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

83,851

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

44,555

 

 

 

1

 

Convertible voting preferred stock—Series FP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

 

215,887

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

217,767

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

217,767

 

 

 

2

 

Repurchase of Series FP voting preferred stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(252

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exchange of Series FP voting preferred stock for Series F non-voting preferred stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,628

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion of Series FP to Class C voting common stock

 

 

(215,887

)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, end of period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

215,887

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

217,767

 

 

 

2

 

Class A non-voting common stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

 

504,902

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

460,655

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

437,363

 

 

 

5

 

Impact of Class A stock split related to Series F non-voting preferred stock (Note 1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

37,668

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,204

 

 

 

 

Impact of Class A stock split related to Class B voting common stock (Note 1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

538

 

 

 

 

 

 

183

 

 

 

 

Impact of Class A stock split related to repurchase of Series FP voting preferred stock (Note 1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(252

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares issued in connection with exercise of stock options under stock-based compensation plans

 

 

9,928

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

Shares issued in connection with exercise of stock options, converted from Class B voting common stock and subsequently sold

 

 

4,923

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of Class A non-voting common stock in connection with acquisitions

 

 

1,854

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,293

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,903

 

 

 

 

Issuance of Class A non-voting common stock for vesting of restricted stock units

 

 

40,922

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of Class A non-voting common stock upon initial public offering, net of issuance costs

 

 

160,350

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion of Class B voting common stock to Class A non-voting common stock

 

 

169,800

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock repurchases from employees for tax withholdings

 

 

(16,867

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class A non-voting common stock sold on behalf of employees to cover taxes

 

 

7,210

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, end of period

 

 

883,022

 

 

$

9

 

 

 

504,902

 

 

$

5

 

 

 

460,655

 

 

$

5

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Net loss

$

(1,033,660

)

 

$

(1,255,911

)

 

$

(3,445,066

)

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities, net of tax

 

797

 

 

 

710

 

 

 

(1,122

)

Foreign currency translation

 

(3,371

)

 

 

(11,720

)

 

 

17,336

 

Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

(2,574

)

 

 

(11,010

)

 

 

16,214

 

Total comprehensive income (loss)

$

(1,036,234

)

 

$

(1,266,921

)

 

$

(3,428,852

)

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Snap Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except par value)

 

December 31,

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

520,317

 

 

$

387,149

 

Marketable securities

 

1,592,488

 

 

 

891,914

 

Accounts receivable, net of allowance

 

492,194

 

 

 

354,965

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

38,987

 

 

 

41,900

 

Total current assets

 

2,643,986

 

 

 

1,675,928

 

Property and equipment, net

 

173,667

 

 

 

212,560

 

Operating lease right-of-use assets

 

275,447

 

 

 

 

Intangible assets, net

 

92,121

 

 

 

126,054

 

Goodwill

 

761,153

 

 

 

632,370

 

Other assets

 

65,550

 

 

 

67,194

 

Total assets

$

4,011,924

 

 

$

2,714,106

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

$

46,886

 

 

$

30,876

 

Operating lease liabilities

 

42,179

 

 

 

 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 

410,610

 

 

 

261,815

 

Total current liabilities

 

499,675

 

 

 

292,691

 

Convertible senior notes, net

 

891,776

 

 

 

 

Operating lease liabilities, noncurrent

 

303,178

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

57,382

 

 

 

110,416

 

Total liabilities

 

1,752,011

 

 

 

403,107

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class A non-voting common stock, $0.00001 par value. 3,000,000 shares authorized, 1,160,127 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 3,000,000 shares authorized, 999,304 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2018.

 

12

 

 

 

10

 

Class B voting common stock, $0.00001 par value. 700,000 shares authorized, 24,522 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 700,000 shares authorized, 93,845 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2018.

 

 

 

 

1

 

Class C voting common stock, $0.00001 par value. 260,888 shares authorized, 231,147 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 260,888 shares authorized, 224,611 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2018.

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

9,205,256

 

 

 

8,220,417

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

573

 

 

 

3,147

 

Accumulated deficit

 

(6,945,930

)

 

 

(5,912,578

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

2,259,913

 

 

 

2,310,999

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$

4,011,924

 

 

$

2,714,106

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Snap Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(in thousands)

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

Convertible voting preferred stock—Series A, A-1, and B

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

146,962

 

 

$

1

 

Conversion of Series A, A-1, and B to Class B

   voting common stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(146,962

)

 

 

(1

)

Balance, end of period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Convertible non-voting preferred stock—Series C

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,000

 

 

 

 

Conversion of Series C to Class B voting common

   stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(16,000

)

 

 

 

Balance, end of period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Convertible non-voting preferred stock—Series D, E, and F

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

83,851

 

 

 

2

 

Conversion of Series D, E, and F to Class B voting

   common stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(83,851

)

 

 

(2

)

Balance, end of period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Convertible voting preferred stock—Series FP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

215,887

 

 

 

2

 

Conversion of Series FP to Class C voting common

   stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(215,887

)

 

 

(2

)

Balance, end of period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class A non-voting common stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

999,304

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

883,022

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

504,902

 

 

 

5

 

Shares issued in connection with exercise of

   stock options under stock-based compensation

   plans

 

3,291

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,856

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,928

 

 

 

 

Shares issued in connection with exercise of stock

   options, converted from Class B voting common

   stock and subsequently sold

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,923

 

 

 

 

Issuance of Class A non-voting common stock in

   connection with acquisitions and divestitures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,854

 

 

 

 

Issuance of Class A non-voting common stock

   for vesting of restricted stock units and

   restricted stock awards, net

 

86,519

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

64,831

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

40,922

 

 

 

 

Issuance of Class A non-voting common stock upon initial public offering, net of issuance costs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

160,350

 

 

 

2

 

Conversion of Class B voting common stock to

   Class A non-voting common stock

 

71,013

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

35,634

 

 

 

 

 

 

169,800

 

 

 

2

 

Stock repurchases from employees for tax withholdings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(39

)

 

 

 

 

 

(16,867

)

 

 

 

Class A non-voting common stock sold on behalf of

   employees to cover taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,210

 

 

 

 

Balance, end of period

 

1,160,127

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

999,304

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

883,022

 

 

 

9

 

Class B voting common stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

93,846

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

122,564

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

31,469

 

 

 

 

Conversion of Series A-F preferred to Class B

   voting common stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

246,813

 

 

 

2

 

Shares issued in connection with exercise of

   stock options under stock-based compensation

   plans

 

1,389

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,414

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,396

 

 

 

 

Shares issued in connection with exercise of stock

   options, converted to Class A non-voting common

   stock and subsequently sold

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4,923

)

 

 

 

Issuance of Class B voting common stock for

   vesting of restricted stock units, net

 

300

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,502

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,906

 

 

 

1

 

Conversion of Class B voting common stock to

   Class A non-voting common stock

 

(71,013

)

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(35,634

)

 

 

 

 

 

(169,800

)

 

 

(2

)

Stock repurchases from employees for tax

   withholdings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8,390

)

 

 

 

Shares converted to Class A non-voting common

   stock and subsequently sold on behalf of

   employees to cover taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(907

)

 

 

 

Balance, end of period

 

24,522

 

 

 

 

 

 

93,846

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

122,564

 

 

 

1

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Snap Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Continued)

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

Class B voting common stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

 

31,469

 

 

$

 

 

 

30,931

 

 

$

 

 

 

30,748

 

 

$

 

Conversion of Series A-F preferred to Class B voting common stock

 

 

246,813

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

686

 

 

 

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

 

Shares issued in connection with exercise of stock options under stock-based compensation plans

 

 

9,396

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares issued in connection with exercise of stock options, converted to Class A non-voting common stock and subsequently sold

 

 

(4,923

)

 

 

 

 

 

(536

)

 

 

 

 

 

(32

)

 

 

 

Repurchase of Class B voting common stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

388

 

 

 

 

 

 

156

 

 

 

 

Issuance of Class B voting common stock for vesting of restricted stock units

 

 

18,906

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion of Class B voting common stock to Class A non-voting common stock

 

 

(169,800

)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock repurchases from employees for tax withholdings

 

 

(8,390

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares converted to Class A non-voting common stock and subsequently sold on behalf of employees to cover taxes

 

 

(907

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, end of period

 

 

122,564

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

31,469

 

 

 

 

 

 

30,931

 

 

 

 

Class C voting common stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion of Series FP preferred stock to Class C voting common stock

 

 

215,887

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of Class C voting common stock for vesting of restricted stock awards

 

 

3,122

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares converted to Class A non-voting common stock and subsequently sold on behalf of employees to cover taxes

 

 

(2,393

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, end of period

 

 

216,616

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

 

 

 

 

2,728,823

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,467,355

 

 

 

 

 

 

711,978

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

2,639,895

 

 

 

 

 

 

31,842

 

 

 

 

 

 

73,524

 

Shares issued in connection with exercise of stock options under stock-based compensation plans

 

 

 

 

 

11,379

 

 

 

 

 

 

698

 

 

 

 

 

 

60

 

Vesting of shares related to early exercise of Class A non-voting common stock options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,218

 

Issuance of Series F non-voting preferred stock, net of issuance costs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,157,146

 

 

 

 

 

 

651,305

 

Issuance of Class A non-voting common stock in connection with acquisitions

 

 

 

 

 

6,406

 

 

 

 

 

 

96,145

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of Class B voting common stock in connection with acquisitions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29,270

 

Repurchase of Class B voting common stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8,013

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1,000

)

Repurchase of Series FP voting preferred stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(16,180

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Settlement of restricted stock units

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(219

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock upon initial public offering, net of issuance costs

 

 

 

 

 

2,642,729

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock repurchases from employees for tax withholdings

 

 

 

 

 

(394,407

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, end of period

 

 

 

 

 

7,634,825

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,728,823

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,467,355

 

Accumulated deficit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

 

 

 

 

(1,207,862

)

 

 

 

 

 

(693,219

)

 

 

 

 

 

(320,326

)

Cumulative-effect adjustment from adoption of ASU 2016-16

 

 

 

 

 

(3,739

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

(3,445,066

)

 

 

 

 

 

(514,643

)

 

 

 

 

 

(372,893

)

Balance, end of period

 

 

 

 

 

(4,656,667

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1,207,862

)

 

 

 

 

 

(693,219

)

Notes receivable from officers/stockholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,000

)

 

 

 

 

 

(2,500

)

Issuance of notes receivable from officers/stockholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(15,000

)

 

 

 

 

 

(7,500

)

Repayment of notes receivable from officers/stockholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, end of period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,000

)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

 

 

 

 

(2,057

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

16,214

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,057

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, end of period

 

 

 

 

 

14,157

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,057

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

1,222,202

 

 

$

2,992,327

 

 

 

999,071

 

 

$

1,518,914

 

 

 

916,870

 

 

$

764,145

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Snap Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Cash flows from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(3,445,066

)

 

$

(514,643

)

 

$

(372,893

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

61,288

 

 

 

29,115

 

 

 

15,307

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

2,639,895

 

 

 

31,842

 

 

 

73,524

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

(17,490

)

 

 

(7,952

)

 

 

(7,700

)

Excess inventory reserve and related asset impairment

 

 

21,997

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

(6,356

)

 

 

889

 

 

 

626

 

Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable, net of allowance

 

 

(104,357

)

 

 

(118,434

)

 

 

(41,905

)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

(39,783

)

 

 

(20,521

)

 

 

(6,590

)

Other assets

 

 

(4,771

)

 

 

(5,064

)

 

 

(4,451

)

Accounts payable

 

 

49,696

 

 

 

6,486

 

 

 

(6,724

)

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 

 

100,988

 

 

 

(19,728

)

 

 

40,026

 

Other liabilities

 

 

9,292

 

 

 

6,765

 

 

 

4,158

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

 

(734,667

)

 

 

(611,245

)

 

 

(306,622

)

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property and equipment

 

 

(84,518

)

 

 

(66,441

)

 

 

(19,205

)

Purchases of intangible assets

 

 

(8,107

)

 

 

(572

)

 

 

(9,100

)

Non-marketable investments

 

 

(10,030

)

 

 

(6,513

)

 

 

(9,551

)

Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired

 

 

(386,011

)

 

 

(104,001

)

 

 

(48,730

)

Issuance of notes receivable from officers/stockholders

 

 

 

 

 

(15,000

)

 

 

(7,500

)

Repayment of notes receivables from officers/stockholders

 

 

 

 

 

15,000

 

 

 

 

Purchases of marketable securities

 

 

(3,862,637

)

 

 

(1,565,347

)

 

 

 

Sales of marketable securities

 

 

511,068

 

 

 

195,898

 

 

 

 

Maturities of marketable securities

 

 

2,483,225

 

 

 

532,690

 

 

 

 

Change in restricted cash

 

 

10,271

 

 

 

(7,048

)

 

 

(1,856

)

Other investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5,000

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(1,346,739

)

 

 

(1,021,334

)

 

 

(100,942

)

Cash flows from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from the exercise of stock options

 

 

11,379

 

 

 

731

 

 

 

60

 

Stock repurchases from employees for tax withholdings

 

 

(394,156

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of Class A common stock in initial public offering, net of underwriting commissions

 

 

2,657,797

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repurchase of Class B voting common stock and Series FP voting preferred stock

 

 

 

 

 

(10,593

)

 

 

(1,000

)

Proceeds from issuances of preferred stock, net of issuance costs

 

 

 

 

 

1,157,147

 

 

 

651,306

 

Borrowings from revolving credit facility

 

 

 

 

 

5,000

 

 

 

 

Principal payments on revolving credit facility

 

 

 

 

 

(5,000

)

 

 

 

Payments of initial public offering costs

 

 

(9,672

)

 

 

(5,395

)

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

 

2,265,348

 

 

 

1,141,890

 

 

 

650,366

 

Change in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

183,942

 

 

 

(490,689

)

 

 

242,802

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

 

150,121

 

 

 

640,810

 

 

 

398,008

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

334,063

 

 

$

150,121

 

 

$

640,810

 

Supplemental disclosures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for income taxes

 

$

6,226

 

 

$

1,686

 

 

$

3

 

Supplemental disclosures of non-cash activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of Class B voting common stock related to acquisitions

 

$

 

 

$

96,145

 

 

$

29,270

 

Assumed equity awards in acquisitions

 

$

3,911

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Purchase consideration liabilities related to acquisitions

 

$

16,486

 

 

$

21,085

 

 

$

 

Repurchase of Class B voting common stock and Series FP voting preferred stock in exchange for notes receivable from officers/stockholders

 

$

 

 

$

13,500

 

 

$

 

Construction in progress related to financing lease obligations

 

$

1,451

 

 

$

1,789

 

 

$

6,305

 

Net change in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities related to property and equipment additions

 

$

13,139

 

 

$

2,084

 

 

$

3,174

 

Deferred offering costs accrued, unpaid

 

$

 

 

$

1,739

 

 

$

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

Class C voting common stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

224,611

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

216,616

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion of Series FP preferred stock to Class C voting common stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

215,887

 

 

 

2

 

Issuance of Class C voting common stock for

   settlement of restricted stock units, net

 

6,536

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,995

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,122

 

 

 

 

Shares converted to Class A non-voting common stock and subsequently sold on behalf of employees to cover taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,393

)

 

 

��

Balance, end of period

 

231,147

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

224,611

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

216,616

 

 

 

2

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

 

 

 

8,220,417

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,634,825

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,728,823

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

686,013

 

 

 

 

 

 

538,211

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,639,895

 

Shares issued in connection with exercise of

   stock options under stock-based  

   compensation plans

 

 

 

 

16,567

 

 

 

 

 

 

47,988

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,379

 

Issuance of Class A non-voting common stock in connection with acquisitions and divestitures

 

 

 

 

6,913

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,406

 

Issuance of common stock upon initial public offering, net of issuance costs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,642,729

 

Stock repurchases from employees for tax

   withholdings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(607

)

 

 

 

 

 

(394,407

)

Equity component of convertible senior notes, net

 

 

 

 

377,432

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase of capped calls

 

 

 

 

(102,086

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, end of period

 

 

 

 

9,205,256

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,220,417

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,634,825

 

Accumulated deficit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

 

 

 

(5,912,578

)

 

 

 

 

 

(4,656,667

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1,207,862

)

Cumulative-effect adjustment from accounting

    changes

 

 

 

 

308

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,739

)

Net loss

 

 

 

 

(1,033,660

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1,255,911

)

 

 

 

 

 

(3,445,066

)

Balance, end of period

 

 

 

 

(6,945,930

)

 

 

 

 

 

(5,912,578

)

 

 

 

 

 

(4,656,667

)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

 

 

 

3,147

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,157

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,057

)

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

 

 

 

(2,574

)

 

 

 

 

 

(11,010

)

 

 

 

 

 

16,214

 

Balance, end of period

 

 

 

 

573

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,147

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,157

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

1,415,796

 

 

$

2,259,913

 

 

 

1,317,761

 

 

$

2,310,999

 

 

 

1,222,202

 

 

$

2,992,327

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Snap Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Snap Inc. is a camera company.

Snap Inc. (“we,” “our,” or “us”) was formed as Future Freshman, LLC, a California limited liability company, in 2010. We changed our name to Toyopa Group, LLC in 2011, incorporated as Snapchat, Inc., a Delaware corporation, in 2012, and changed our name to Snap Inc. in 2016. Snap Inc. is headquartered in Venice,Santa Monica, California. Our flagship product, Snapchat, is a camera application that was created to help people communicate through short videos and images called “Snaps.”

Basis of Presentation

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Snap Inc. and our wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Our fiscal year ends on December 31.

Stock Split Effected in the Form of a Stock Dividend

On October 26, 2016, our board of directors approved a distribution of shares of Class A common stock as a dividend to the holders of all preferred stock and common stock outstanding on October 31, 2016. One share of Class A common stock was distributed for each share of preferred stock and common stock outstanding (the “Stock Split”). As a result of the Stock Split, each outstanding equity award was adjusted to entitle the award holder to receive one share of Class A common stock for each outstanding restricted stock award or stock option to acquire a share of either Class A common stock or Class B common stock. Share and per share amounts for Class A common stock disclosed for all prior periods have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the effects of the Stock Split.

Initial Public Offering

In March 2017, we completed our initial public offering (“IPO”) in which we issued and sold 160.3 million shares of Class A common stock, inclusive of the over-allotment, at an initial public offering price of $17.00 per share and excluding shares sold in the IPO by certain of our existing stockholders. We received net proceeds of $2.6 billion after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of $68.1 million and other offering expenses of $14.7 million. On the closing of the IPO, all shares of our then-outstanding convertible preferred stock other than Series FP preferred stock automatically converted into an aggregate of 246.8 million shares of Class B common stock and all outstanding shares of Series FP preferred stock automatically converted into 215.9 million shares of Class C common stock. Following the IPO, we have three classes of authorized common stock – Class A common stock, Class B common stock, and Class C common stock.

Restricted stock units (“RSUs”) granted to employees before January 1, 2017 (“Pre-2017 RSUs”) included both service-based and performance conditions to vest in the underlying common stock. The performance condition related to these awards was satisfied on the effectiveness of the registration statement for our IPO, which occurred in March 2017. On the effectiveness of the registration statement for our IPO, we recognized $1.3 billion of stock-based compensation expense for Pre-2017 RSUs. To meet the related tax withholding requirements, we withheld 12.1 million of the 26.7 million shares of common stock issued. Based on the initial public offering price of $17.00 per share, the tax withholding obligation for these vested Pre-2017 RSUs was $206.6 million.

In addition, on the closing of the IPO, our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) received an RSU award (“CEO award”) for 37.4 million shares of Series FP preferred stock, which automatically converted into an equivalent number of shares of Class C common stock on the closing of the IPO. The CEO award represented 3.0% of all outstanding shares on the closing of the IPO, including shares sold by us in the IPO and vested stock options and RSUs, net of shares withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations, on the closing of the IPO. The CEO award vested immediately on the closing of the IPO, and such shares will beare being delivered to the CEO in equal quarterly installments over three years beginningwhich began in November 2017. There is no continuing service requirement for our CEO. The stock-based compensation expense recognized related to the CEO award was $636.6 million, which is based on the vesting of 37.4 million shares of Class C common stock on the closing of the IPO, at the initial public offering price of $17.00 per share. For the year endedAs of December 31, 2017,2019 and 2018, in accordance with terms of the CEO award, 3.128.0 million and 15.6 million shares of Class C common stock were issued, respectively. At December 31, 2019 and 34.32018, 9.4 million and 21.8 million shares of Class C common stock arewere to be issued in future periods in equal quarterly installments through 2020.2020, respectively.


The future tax benefits on settlement of the above RSUs is not expected to be material as currently we have established valuation allowances to reduce our net deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The majority of the future tax benefits that arise on settlement of the above RSUs are in jurisdictions for which our net deferred tax assets have a full valuation allowance.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements. Management’s estimates are based on historical information available as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Key estimates relate primarily to determining the fair value of assets and liabilities assumed in business combinations, evaluation of contingencies, uncertain tax positions, excess inventory reserves, lease exit charges, forfeiture rate, the fair value of convertible senior notes, and the fair value of stock-based awards. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates our estimates compared to historical experience and trends, which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities.

Concentrations of Business Risk

We currently use both Google cloud servicesCloud and Amazon Web Services for substantially all of our hosting requirements. A disruption or loss of service from this partnerone or both of these partners could seriously harm our ability to operate. Although we believe there are other qualified providers that can provide these services, a transition to a new provider could create a significant disruption to our business and negatively impact our consolidated financial statements.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities, and accounts receivable. We maintain cash deposits, cash equivalent balances, and marketable securities with several financial institutions. Cash and cash equivalents may be withdrawn or redeemed on demand. We believe that the financial institutions that hold our cash and cash equivalents are financially sound and, accordingly, minimal credit risk exists with respect to these balances. We also maintain investments in U.S. government debt and agency securities, corporate debt securities, certificates of deposit, and commercial paper that carry high credit ratings and accordingly, minimal credit risk exists with respect to these balances.

We extend credit to our customers based on an evaluation of their ability to pay amounts due under contractual arrangement and generally do not obtain or require collateral.

Revenue Recognition

We generate substantially all of our revenues by offering various advertising products on Snapchat, including Snap Ads, which are vertical full screen video advertisements, and Sponsored Creative Tools, which include Geofilters and Lenses. Sponsored Geofilters allow users to interact with an advertiser’s brand by enabling stylized brand artwork to be overlaid on a Snap. Sponsored Lenses allow users to interact with an advertiser’s brand by enabling branded interactive experiences.

Revenue from our advertising products is recognized when persuasive evidencecontrol of an arrangement exists withthe promised goods or services is transferred to our customers, the services have been provided or delivered, the fees are fixed or determinable, and collectability of the related receivable is reasonably assured. The majority of advertising revenue is generated from the display of advertisements on Snapchat through contractual agreements, that are either on a fixed fee basis over a period of time or based on the number of advertising impressions delivered. Revenue related to agreements based on the number of impressions delivered is recognized when the advertisement is displayed. Revenue related to fixed fee arrangements is recognized ratably over the service period, typically less than 30 days in duration, and such arrangements do not contain minimum impression guarantees. In determining whether an arrangement exists, we ensure that an agreement, such as an insertion order, has been fully executed. We determine collectability by performing ongoing credit evaluations and monitoring customer accounts receivable balances. Sales tax is excluded from reported revenue.


We sell advertising directly to advertisers (“Snap-sold” revenue) and certain partners that provide content on Snapchat (“content partners”) also sell directly to advertisers (“partner-sold” revenue). Snap Ads may be subject to revenue sharing agreements between us and our content partners. Our Sponsored Creative Tools are only Snap-sold and are not subject to revenue sharing arrangements. Snap-sold revenue is recognized based on the gross amount that reflects the consideration we charge the advertiser. Partner-sold revenue is recognized based on the net amount of revenue received from the content partners. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 approximately 94%, 91%, and 87% of our advertising revenue was Snap-sold and approximately 6%, 9%, and 13% of our advertising revenue was partner-sold, respectively.

We report Snap-sold revenue on a gross basis predominately because we are the primary obligor responsibleexpect to receive in exchange for fulfilling advertisement delivery, including the acceptability of the services delivered. For Snap-sold advertising, we enter into contractual arrangements directly with advertisers. We are directly responsiblethose goods or services. See Note 2 for the fulfillment of the contractual terms and any remedy for issues with such fulfillment. For Snap-sold revenue, we also have latitude in establishing the selling price with the advertiser, as we sell advertisements at a rate determined at our sole discretion.

We report revenue related to transactions sold by our content partners on a net basis predominately because the content partner, and not Snap Inc., is the primary obligor responsible for fulfillment, including the acceptability of the services delivered. In partner-sold advertising arrangements, the content partner has a direct contractual relationship with the advertiser. There is no contractual relationship between us and the advertiser for partner-sold transactions. When a content partner sells advertisements, the content partner is responsible for fulfilling the advertisements, and accordingly, we have determined the content partner is the primary obligor. Additionally, we do not have any latitude in establishing the price with the advertiser for partner-sold advertising. The content partner may sell advertisements at a rate determined at its sole discretion.

We also generate revenue from sales of our hardware product, Spectacles. Revenue from sales of Spectacles is recognized when delivered, risk of loss has transferred to the customer, and no significant obligations remain. We offer customers limited rights to return products and we record reductions to revenue for expected future product returns. For the periods presented, revenue from the sales of Spectacles was not material.additional information.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue includes payments made by us based onfor content and third party selling costs, referred to as revenue share arrangements with our content partners.share. Under some of these arrangements, we pay a portion of the fees we receive from the advertisers for Snap Ads that are displayed within partner content on Snapchat. Such revenue-shareRevenue-share costs were $96.3$174.7 million, $57.8$120.3 million, and $9.6$96.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2015,2017, respectively.

In addition, cost of revenue consists of expenses associated with hostinginfrastructure costs of the Snapchat mobile application, and content creation, which includes personnel-related costs and advertising measurement services. In addition, costservices, and personnel-related costs. Cost of revenue includes inventory costs for our Spectacles hardware product and facilities and other supporting overhead costs, including depreciation and amortization.amortization, and inventory costs for Spectacles.

Advertising

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and were $10.9$31.4 million, $9.4$11.3 million, and $2.7$10.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, 2016, and 2015 respectively.


Stock-based Compensation

We measure and recognize compensation expense for stock-based payment awards, including stock options, RSUs, and RSUsrestricted stock awards (“RSAs”) granted to employees, directors, and advisors, based on the grant date fair value of the awards. Awards granted to non-employees are marked-to-market each quarter. The grant date fair value of stock options is estimated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair value of stock-based compensation for stock options is recognized on a straight-line basis, net of estimated forfeitures, over the period during which services are provided in exchange for the award. The grant date fair value of RSUs and RSAs is estimated based on the fair value of our underlying common stock.

Pre-2017 RSUs contained both service-based and performance conditions to vest in the underlying common stock. The service-based condition criteria is generally met 10% after the first year of service, 20% over the second year, 30% over the third year, and 40% over the fourth year. The performance condition related to these awards was satisfied on the effectiveness of the registration statement for our IPO, which occurred in March 2017. Awards which contain both service-based and performance conditions arewere recognized using the accelerated attribution method once the performance condition iswas probable of occurring.


All RSUs granted after December 31, 2016 vest on the satisfaction of only a service-based condition (“Post-2017 RSUs”). The service condition for RSUs granted prior to February 2018 is generally satisfied over four years, 10% after the first year of service, 20% over the second year, 30% over the third year, and 40% over the fourth year. In limited instances, we have issued Post-2017 RSUs with vesting periods in excess of four years. The service condition for RSUs and RSAs granted after February 2018 is generally satisfied in equal monthly or quarterly installments over four years. For these awards, we recognize stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.

Stock option and RSU awards issued to non-employees are accounted for at fair value. The fair value of each non-employee stock-based compensation award is re-measured each period until the earlier of the date at which the non-employee’s performance is complete or a performance commitment date is reached, which is generally the vesting date. Stock-based compensation expense for non-employee stock awards is recognized on a straight-line basis in our consolidated statements of operations.

Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for all periods presented is based on awards that are expected to vest, less estimatedincluding an estimate of forfeitures. We estimate the forfeiture rate using historical forfeitures of our stock-basedequity awards based on an analysis of actual forfeitures, employee turnover, and other factors.expected changes in facts and circumstances, if any. A modification of the terms of a stock-based award is treated as an exchange of the original award for a new award with total compensation cost equal to the grant-date fair value of the original award plus the incremental value of the modification to the award.

Income Taxes

We are subject to income taxes in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the deferred tax asset or liability is expected to be realized or settled.

In evaluating our ability to recover deferred tax assets, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including historical operating results, ongoing tax planning, and forecasts of future taxable income on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis. Based on the level of historical losses, we have established a valuation allowance to reduce our net deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.

We recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in our consolidated financial statements from such positions are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized. We recognize interest and penalties associated with tax matters as part of the income tax provision and include accrued interest and penalties with the related income tax liability on our consolidated balance sheets.

Currency Translation and Remeasurement

The functional currency of the majority of our foreign subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency are remeasured into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. Revenue and expenses are remeasured at the average exchange rates during the period. Equity transactions and other non-monetary assets are remeasured using historical exchange rates. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recorded in other income (expense), net on our consolidated statement of operations. For those foreign subsidiaries where the local currency is the functional currency, adjustments to translate those statements into U.S. dollars are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less from the date of purchase.


Restricted Cash

We are required to maintain restricted cash deposits to back letters of credit for certain property leases. These funds are restricted and have been classified in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets due to the nature of restriction. At December 31, 20172019 and 2016, we maintained2018, restricted cash totaling $2.9 million and $13.2 million, respectively.balances were immaterial.


Marketable Securities

We hold investments in marketable securities consisting of U.S. government securities, and U.S. government agency securities.securities, corporate debt securities, certificates of deposit, and commercial paper. We classify our marketable securities as available-for-sale investments in our current assets because they represent investments available for current operations. Our available-for-sale investments are carried at fair value with any unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, included in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income in stockholders’ equity. We determine gains or losses on the sale or maturities of marketable securities using the specific identification method and these gains or losses are recorded in other income (expense), net in our consolidated statements of operations. Unrealized losses are recorded in other income (expense), net when a decline in fair value is determined to be other than temporary.

Inventory

Prepaid expenses and other current assets include our Spectacles inventory, which consists of finished goods purchased from contract manufacturers. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market on a weighted-average cost basis. Inventories are written down for estimated obsolescence or excess inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and estimated market value. Adjustments to reduce inventory to net realizable value are recognized in cost of revenue.

Excess Inventory and Related Charges

During the third quarter of 2017, based on management’s updated assessment, we recorded $39.9 million of charges related to Spectacles inventory. The charges were composed of $19.5 million of excess inventory reserves, $17.9 million of inventory purchase commitment cancellation charges, and $2.5 million of asset impairments. As of December 31, 2017, Spectacles inventory included in prepaid expenses and other current assets was not material.

Non-Marketable Investments

Our investments in privately-held companies are primarily non-marketable equity securities without readily determinable fair values. We accountadjust the carrying value of non-marketable equity securities to fair value upon observable transactions for non-marketableidentical or similar investments underof the cost method when wesame issuer or upon impairment. Any adjustments to carrying value of these investments are not able to exercise significant influence over the investee. recorded in other income (expense) net in our consolidated statements of operations.

When we exercise significant influence over, but do not control the investee, such non-marketable investments are accounted for using the equity method. Under the equity method of accounting, we record our share of the results of the investments within other income (expense), net in our consolidated statements of operations.

Fair Value Measurements

Certain financial instruments are required to be recorded at fair value. Other financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value. Additionally, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these financial instruments.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount less any allowance for doubtful accounts to reserve for potentially uncollectible receivables. To determine the amount of the allowance, we make judgments about the creditworthiness of customers based on ongoing credit evaluation and historical experience. At December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the allowance for doubtful accounts was immaterial.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. We compute depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which is generally three years for computer hardware and software, five years for furniture and equipment, and over the shorter of lease term or useful life of the assets for leasehold improvements. Buildings are depreciated over a useful life ranging from 25 to 45 years. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.


Build-to-Suit Leases

We capitalize construction in progress and record a corresponding long-term liability for build-to-suithave various non-cancelable lease agreements where we are considered the owner, for accounting purposes, during the construction period. For buildings under build-to-suit lease arrangements where we have taken occupancy, which do not qualify for sales recognition under the sale-leaseback accounting guidance, we determined that we continue to be the deemed ownercertain of these buildings. This is principally due to our significant investment in tenant improvements. As a result, the buildings are being depreciated over the shorter of their


useful lives or the related lease term. At occupancy, the long-term construction obligations are considered long-term finance lease obligations andoffices. Leases are recorded as other liabilities with amounts payable during the next 12 months recorded as accrued expensesoperating lease right-of-use assets and other currentoperating lease liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. Assets capitalized under build-to-suit leases were $54.0 million and $47.7 million asLeases with an initial term of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. A portion oftwelve months or less are not recorded on the assets were placed into service duringconsolidated balance sheets. We recognize rent expense on a straight-line basis over the year ended December 31, 2016, resulting in an immaterial amount of depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2016. Depreciation expense for assets capitalized under build-to-suit leases was $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.lease term.

Software Development Costs

Software development costs include costs to develop software to be used to meet internal needs and applications used to deliver our services. We capitalize development costs related to these software applications once the preliminary project stage is complete and it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used to perform the function intended. Costs capitalized for developing such software applications were not material for the periods presented.

Segments

Our CEO is our chief operating decision maker. We have determined that we have a single operating segment. Our CEO reviewsevaluates performance and makes operating decisions about allocating resources based on financial informationdata presented on a consolidated basis accompanied by disaggregated information about revenue by geographic region. There are no segment managers who are held accountable by the chief operating decision maker for operations, operating results, and planning for levels or components below the consolidated unit level. We therefore have determined we have a single operating segment.

Business Combinations

We include the results of operations of the businesses that we acquire from the date of acquisition. We determine the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of the respective date of acquisition. The excess purchase price over the fair values of identifiable assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill. Determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires management to use significant judgment and estimates including the selection of valuation methodologies, estimates of future revenue and cash flows, discount rates, and selection of comparable companies. Our estimates of fair value are based on assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable and, as a result, actual results may differ from estimates. During the measurement period, not to exceed one year from the date of acquisition, we may record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with a corresponding offset to goodwill. At the conclusion of the measurement period, any subsequent adjustments are reflected in the consolidated statements of operations.

When we issue payments or grants of equity to selling shareholdersstockholders in connection with an acquisition, we evaluate whether the payments or awards are compensatory. This evaluation includes whether cash payments or stock award vesting is contingent on the continued employment of the selling stockholder beyond the acquisition date. If continued employment is required for the cash to be paid or stock awards to vest, the award is treated as compensation for post-acquisition services and is recognized as compensation expense.

Transaction costs associated with business combinations are expensed as incurred, and are included in general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations.


Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired in a business combination. We test goodwill for impairment at least annually, in the fourth quarter, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that goodwill might be impaired. For all periods presented, we had a single operating segment and reporting unit structure.

In testing for goodwill impairment, we first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, we determine it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then additional impairment testing is not required. However, if we conclude otherwise, we perform the first of a two-step impairment test.


The first step compares the estimated fair value of a reporting unit to its book value, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value exceeds book value, goodwill is considered not to be impaired and no additional steps are necessary. However, if the fair value of the reporting unit is less than book value, then under the second step the carrying amount of the goodwill is compared to its implied fair value. There were no0 impairment charges in any of the periods presented.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets are carried at cost and amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. We determine the appropriate useful life of our intangible assets by measuring the expected cash flows of acquired assets. The estimated useful lives of intangible assets are as follows:

 

Intangible Asset

 

Estimated Useful

Life

Domain names

 

5 Years

Trademarks

 

1 to 5 Years

Non-compete agreements

1 to 3 Years

Acquired developed technology

 

54 to 7 Years

Customer relationships

 

2 to 5 Years

Patents

 

3 to 11 Years

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We evaluate recoverability of our property and equipment and intangible assets, excluding goodwill, when events or changes indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Events and changes in circumstances considered in determining whether the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable include: significant changes in performance relative to expected operating results; significant changes in asset use; and significant negative industry or economic trends and changes in our business strategy. Recoverability of these assets is measured by comparison of their carrying amount to future undiscounted cash flows to be generated. If impairment is indicated based on a comparison of the assets’ carrying values and the undiscounted cash flows, the impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. We determined that there were no events or changes in circumstances that indicated our long-lived assets were impaired during any of the periods presented.

Legal Contingencies

For legal contingencies, we accrue a liability for an estimated loss if the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is considered probable, and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Legal fees and expenses are expensed as incurred. Note 68 provides additional information regarding our legal contingencies.

Convertible Notes

We account for the Convertible Notes as separate liability and equity components. The carrying amount of the liability component is calculated by measuring the fair value of a similar liability that does not have an associated convertible feature. The carrying amount of the equity component, representing the conversion option, is calculated by deducting the fair value of the liability component from the total principal of the Convertible Notes. This amount represents a debt discount which is amortized to interest expense over the term of the Convertible Notes using the effective interest rate method, which maintains a constant rate of interest expense based on the increasing carrying value of the debt.


Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2017,December 2019, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805) Clarifying2019-12, Simplifying the DefinitionAccounting for Income Taxes, as part of a Business. The amendmentsits Simplification Initiative to reduce the cost and complexity in this update clarifyaccounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 removes certain exceptions related to the definitionapproach for intraperiod tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period and the recognition of a business withdeferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. ASU 2019-12 also amends other aspects of the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposalshelp simplify and promote consistent application of assets or businesses. The definition of a business affects many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill, and consolidation.GAAP. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and should be applied prospectively on or after the effective date,2020, with early adoption permitted. We early adopted ASU 2017-01 effective January 1, 2018.2019-12 in the fourth quarter of 2019. The adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016,August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)2018-15, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other — Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Restricted Cash, which requires restricted cash to be presentedCustomer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract. ASU 2018-15 aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs in a cloud computing arrangement service contract with cash and cash equivalents on the statement of cash flows and disclosure of how the statement of cash flows reconciles to the balance sheet if restricted cash is shown separately from cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet. ASU 2016-18requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred for an internal-use software license. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017,2019, with early adoption permitted. We adopted ASU 2016-18 effective January 1, 2018 and we do not expect this new standard will have a significantmaterial impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In OctoberJune 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 740)326): Intra-Entity TransferMeasurement of Assets Other than Inventory, whichCredit Losses on Financial Instruments. ASU 2016-13 replaced the incurred loss impairment methodology under current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires the recognitionconsideration of the income tax consequencesa broader range of an intra-entity transferreasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. ASU 2016-13 requires use of an asset,a forward-looking expected credit loss model for accounts receivables, loans, and other than inventory, when the transfer occurs.financial instruments. ASU 2016-162016-13 is effective for interim and annual periodsfiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018,2019, with early adoption permitted. Adoption of the standard requires using a modified retrospective approach through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the effective date to align existing credit loss methodology with the new standard. In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-11, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses. ASU 2019-11 requires entities that did not adopt the amendments in ASU 2016-13 as of November 2019 to adopt ASU 2019-11. This ASU contains the same effective dates and transition requirements as ASU 2016-13. We adopted ASU 2016-16 on2016-13 and ASU 2019-11 effective January 1, 2017 and the2020. The impact of adoption did not have a material impactof these standards on our consolidated financial statements, due to a valuation allowance on our net deferred tax assets.


In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receiptsincluding accounting policies, processes, and Cash Payments. ASU 2016-15 provides guidance for targeted changes with respect to how cash receipts and cash payments are classified in the statements of cash flows, with the objective of reducing diversity in practice. ASU 2016-15systems, is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We adopted ASU 2016-15 effective January 1, 2018 and do not expect a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.material.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and requires expanded disclosures about leasing arrangements. Effective January 1, 2019, we adopted ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018,using the modified retrospective approach. We elected certain practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance, including the election to carryforward historical lease classification. We also elected the short-term lease practical expedient, which allowed us to not recognize leases with early adoption permitted. We are in the processa term of evaluating the impact of this accounting standards update on our consolidated financial statements, which will consist primarily of including lease assets and lease liabilitiesless than twelve months on our consolidated balance sheet.

sheets. In May 2014,addition, we elected the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). Topic 606 supersedeslease and non-lease components practical expedient, which allowed us to calculate the revenue recognition requirementspresent value of the fixed payments without performing an allocation of lease and non-lease components. Adoption of the new standard resulted in ASU Topic 605, Revenue Recognition,recording operating lease right-of-use assets and requiresoperating lease liabilities of approximately $284.5 million and $375.4 million, respectively, on our consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2019. The impact of the recognitionadoption was recorded as an adjustment to accumulated deficit as of revenue when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. Topic 606 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period, with early adoption permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016.January 1, 2019 and was not material. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or modified retrospective (cumulative effect) transition method.

The most significant aspect of our evaluation of Topic 606 related to ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net). This implementation guidance discusses principal versus agent considerations and gross versus net revenue reporting, including specific indicators to assist in the determination of whether we control a specified good or service before it is transferred to the customer. Through our evaluation, we have concluded Snap-sold revenue will be reported on a gross basis and partner-sold revenue will be reported on a net basis, which is consistent with our current revenue recognition policies. We concluded that we control the Snap-sold advertising campaign before it is transferred to the customer because we provide the advertising campaign on Snapchat and have discretion in establishing the price of the advertisements. We concluded that the partner controls significant aspects of the partner-sold advertising campaign before it is transferred to the customer and the partner has discretion in establishing price with the advertiser.

We adopted Topic 606 effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective transition method. The adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.statements of operations or cash flows.


2. Revenue

2.Revenue is recognized when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to our customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to receive in exchange for those goods or services. We determine collectability by performing ongoing credit evaluations and monitoring customer accounts receivable balances. Sales taxes, including value added taxes, are excluded from reported revenue.

We generate substantially all of our revenues by offering various advertising products on Snapchat, which include Snap Ads and Sponsored Creative Tools, and measurement services, referred to as advertising revenue. Sponsored Creative Tools include Sponsored Geofilters and Sponsored Lenses. Sponsored Geofilters allow users to interact with an advertiser’s brand by enabling stylized brand artwork to be overlaid on a Snap. Sponsored Lenses allow users to interact with an advertiser’s brand by enabling branded augmented reality experiences.

The substantial majority of advertising revenue is generated from the display of advertisements on Snapchat through contractual agreements that are either on a fixed fee basis over a period of time or based on the number of advertising impressions delivered. Revenue related to agreements based on the number of impressions delivered is recognized when the advertisement is displayed. Revenue related to fixed fee arrangements is recognized ratably over the service period, typically less than 30 days in duration, and such arrangements do not contain minimum impression guarantees. In determining whether an arrangement exists, we ensure that an agreement, such as an insertion order or self-serve terms, have been fully executed or accepted electronically.

We sell advertising directly to advertisers (“Snap-sold” revenue) and certain partners that provide content on Snapchat (“content partners”) also sell directly to advertisers (“partner-sold” revenue). Snap Ads may be subject to revenue sharing agreements between us and our content partners. Our Sponsored Creative Tools and measurement services are only Snap-sold and are not subject to revenue sharing arrangements. Snap-sold revenue is recognized based on the gross amount that we charge the advertiser. Partner-sold revenue is recognized based on the net amount of revenue to be received from the content partners.

We recognize Snap-sold revenue on a gross basis predominantly because we are the primary obligor responsible for fulfilling advertisement delivery, including the acceptability of the services delivered. For Snap-sold advertising, we enter into contractual arrangements directly with advertisers. We are directly responsible for the fulfillment of the contractual terms and any remedy for issues with such fulfillment. For Snap-sold revenue, we also have latitude in establishing the selling price with the advertiser, as we sell advertisements at a rate determined at our sole discretion.

We recognize partner-sold revenue on a net basis predominantly because the content partner, and not Snap, is the primary obligor responsible for fulfillment, including the acceptability of the services delivered. In partner-sold advertising arrangements, the content partner has a direct contractual relationship with the advertiser. There is no contractual relationship between us and the advertiser for partner-sold transactions. When a content partner sells advertisements, the content partner is responsible for fulfilling the advertisements, and accordingly, we have determined the content partner is the primary obligor. Additionally, we do not have any latitude in establishing the price with the advertiser for partner-sold advertising. The content partner may sell advertisements at a rate determined at its sole discretion. For the periods presented, partner-sold revenue was not material.

We also generate revenue from sales of our hardware product, Spectacles. For the periods presented, revenue from the sales of Spectacles was not material.


The following table represents our revenue disaggregated by geography based on the billing address of the advertising customer:

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North America (1) (2)

$

1,068,108

 

 

$

780,992

 

 

$

675,402

 

Europe (3)

 

299,913

 

 

 

183,077

 

 

 

98,047

 

Rest of world

 

347,513

 

 

 

216,377

 

 

 

51,500

 

Total revenue

$

1,715,534

 

 

$

1,180,446

 

 

$

824,949

 

(1)

North America includes Mexico, the Caribbean, and Central America.

(2)

United States revenue was $1.0 billion, $752.9 million, and $643.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.

(3)

Europe includes Russia and Turkey.

3. Net Loss per Share

We compute net loss per share using the two-class method required for multiple classes of common stock and participating securities. Our participating securities include any shares issued on the early exercise of stock options subject to repurchase because holders of such shares have non-forfeitable dividend rights in the event a dividend is paid on common stock.

In March 2017, we completed our IPO in which we issued and sold 160.3 million shares of Class A common stock, inclusive of the over-allotment, at an initial public offering price of $17.00 per share and excluding shares sold in the IPO by certain of our existing stockholders. We received net proceeds of $2.6 billion after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of $68.1 million and other offering expenses of $14.7 million. On the closing of the IPO, all shares of our then-outstanding convertible preferred stock other than Series FP preferred stock automatically converted into an aggregate of 246.8 million shares of Class B common stock and all outstanding shares of Series FP preferred stock automatically converted into 215.9 million shares of Class C common stock. Following the IPO, we have three classes of authorized common stock – Class A common stock, Class B common stock, and Class C common stock.

Before theour IPO, our participating securities also included Series D, E, F, and FP preferred stock and Series A, A-1, B, and C convertible preferred stock. The rights, including the liquidation and dividend rights, of the Class A common stock and Class B common stock, and the Series D, E, F, and FP preferred stock were substantially identical, other than voting rights. Accordingly, the Class A common stock, Class B common stock, and the Series D, E, F, and FP preferred stock shared equally in our net losses. The holders of early exercised shares subject to repurchase and the holders of Series A, A-1, B, and C convertible preferred stock did not have a contractual obligation to share in our losses, and as a result our net losses were not allocated to these participating securities.

In connection with our IPO, our Series D, E, and F preferred stock converted on a one-to-one1-to-one basis into Class B common stock, and our Series FP preferred stock converted on a one-to-one1-to-one basis into Class C common stock. The liquidation and dividend rights of the aforementioned preferred series are substantially identical to the rights of the common classes into which they converted. Accordingly, we have presented the Series D, E, and F preferred stock outstanding before the IPO together with the Class B common stock, and the Series FP preferred stock outstanding before the IPO together with the Class C common stock for purposes of calculating net loss per share. The prior period presentation has been adjusted to conform to our current period presentation.


Also in connection with our IPO, our Series A, A-1, B, and C preferred stock converted on a one-to-one1-to-one basis into Class B common stock. The shares of Class B common stock that resulted from the conversion of the Series A, A-1, B, and C preferred stock are weighted in the denominator of net loss per share for Class B common stock for the portion of the time outstanding subsequent to our IPO.

Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to each class of stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares of stock outstanding during the period. Vested RSUs that have not been settled, including the


vested CEO award, and RSAs for which the risk of forfeiture has lapsed have been included in the appropriate common share class used to calculate basic net loss per share.

For the calculation of diluted net loss per share, net loss per share attributable to common stockholders for basic net loss per share is adjusted by the effect of dilutive securities, including awards under our equity compensation plans. Diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is computed by dividing the resulting net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of fully diluted common shares outstanding. InWe use the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016if-converted method for calculating any potential dilutive effect of the Convertible Notes on diluted net loss per share, subject to meeting the criteria for using the treasury stock method in future periods. The Convertible Notes would have a dilutive impact on net income per share when the average market price of Class A common stock for a given period exceeds the conversion price of the Convertible Notes. For the periods presented, our potentialpotentially dilutive shares relating to stock options, RSUs, RSAs, Convertible Notes, and common stock subject to repurchase and, for the 2016 periods, shares of Series A, A-1, B, and C convertible preferred stock were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per share as the effect of including these shares in the calculation would have been anti-dilutive.

The numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted net loss per share computations for our common stock are calculated as follows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2015:2017:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Class A

Common(1)

 

 

Class B

Common(2)

 

 

Class C

Common(3)

 

 

Class A

Common

 

 

Class B

Common(2)

 

 

Class C

Common(3)

 

 

Class A

Common

 

 

Class B

Common(2)

 

 

Class C

Common(3)

 

 

Class A

Common

 

 

Class B

Common

 

 

Class C

Common

 

 

Class A

Common

 

 

Class B

Common

 

 

Class C

Common

 

 

Class A

Common(3)

 

 

Class B

Common(1)

 

 

Class C

Common(2)

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

$

(2,169,120

)

 

$

(548,098

)

 

$

(727,848

)

 

$

(311,523

)

 

$

(65,174

)

 

$

(137,946

)

 

$

(228,933

)

 

$

(33,054

)

 

$

(110,906

)

 

$

(817,156

)

 

$

(33,341

)

 

$

(183,164

)

 

$

(921,235

)

 

$

(94,897

)

 

$

(239,779

)

 

$

(2,169,120

)

 

$

(548,098

)

 

$

(727,848

)

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

$

(2,169,120

)

 

$

(548,098

)

 

$

(727,848

)

 

$

(311,523

)

 

$

(65,174

)

 

$

(137,946

)

 

$

(228,933

)

 

$

(33,054

)

 

$

(110,906

)

 

$

(817,156

)

 

$

(33,341

)

 

$

(183,164

)

 

$

(921,235

)

 

$

(94,897

)

 

$

(239,779

)

 

$

(2,169,120

)

 

$

(548,098

)

 

$

(727,848

)

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic shares:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average common shares - Basic

 

734,203

 

 

 

185,520

 

 

 

246,362

 

 

 

489,019

 

 

 

102,309

 

 

 

216,543

 

 

 

449,516

 

 

 

64,901

 

 

 

217,767

 

 

 

1,087,366

 

 

 

44,366

 

 

 

243,730

 

 

 

953,992

 

 

 

98,271

 

 

 

248,305

 

 

 

734,203

 

 

 

185,520

 

 

 

246,362

 

Diluted shares:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average common shares - Diluted

 

734,203

 

 

 

185,520

 

 

 

246,362

 

 

 

489,019

 

 

 

102,309

 

 

 

216,543

 

 

 

449,516

 

 

 

64,901

 

 

 

217,767

 

 

 

1,087,366

 

 

 

44,366

 

 

 

243,730

 

 

 

953,992

 

 

 

98,271

 

 

 

248,305

 

 

 

734,203

 

 

 

185,520

 

 

 

246,362

 

Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

$

(2.95

)

 

$

(2.95

)

 

$

(2.95

)

 

$

(0.64

)

 

$

(0.64

)

 

$

(0.64

)

 

$

(0.51

)

 

$

(0.51

)

 

$

(0.51

)

 

$

(0.75

)

 

$

(0.75

)

 

$

(0.75

)

 

$

(0.97

)

 

$

(0.97

)

 

$

(0.97

)

 

$

(2.95

)

 

$

(2.95

)

 

$

(2.95

)

Diluted

$

(2.95

)

 

$

(2.95

)

 

$

(2.95

)

 

$

(0.64

)

 

$

(0.64

)

 

$

(0.64

)

 

$

(0.51

)

 

$

(0.51

)

 

$

(0.51

)

 

$

(0.75

)

 

$

(0.75

)

 

$

(0.75

)

 

$

(0.97

)

 

$

(0.97

)

 

$

(0.97

)

 

$

(2.95

)

 

$

(2.95

)

 

$

(2.95

)

 

(1)

Class A common stock includes the issuance of 160.3 million shares of Class A common stock issued by us in connection with our IPO.

(2)

Included in the Class B common stock, for all periods presented, is Series D, E, and F preferred stock, which automatically converted to Class B common stock on the closing of the IPO. Series A, A-1, B, and C preferred stock are included in Class B common stock on the automatic conversion of such shares to 163.0 million shares of Class B common stock on the closing of theour IPO.

(3)(2)

Included in the Class C common stock, for all periods presented, is Series FP preferred stock which automatically converted to Class C common stock on the closing of the IPO. Additionally, 37.4 million shares of Class C common stock related to the CEO award are included in Class C common stock on the closing of theour IPO.


(3)

Class A common stock includes the issuance of 160.3 million shares of Class A common stock issued by us in connection with our IPO.

The following potentially dilutive shares were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive for the periods presented:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Convertible voting preferred stock, Series A, A-1 and B

 

 

 

 

146,962

 

 

 

146,962

 

Convertible non-voting preferred stock, Series C

 

 

 

 

16,000

 

 

 

16,000

 

Stock options

 

32,596

 

 

 

44,904

 

 

 

43,896

 

Unvested RSUs not subject to a performance condition

 

163,796

 

 

 

150

 

 

 

404

 

Shares subject to repurchase

 

 

 

 

185

 

 

 

4,984

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Stock options

 

 

10,262

 

 

 

16,291

 

 

 

32,596

 

Unvested RSUs and RSAs

 

 

148,797

 

 

 

158,264

 

 

 

163,796

 

Convertible Notes (if-converted)

 

 

55,468

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.


4. Stockholders’ Equity

Common Stock

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we are authorized to issue 3,000,000,000 shares of Class A nonvoting common stock, 700,000,000 shares of Class B voting common stock, and 260,887,848 shares of Class C voting common stock, each with a par value of $0.00001 per share. Class A common stock has no voting rights, Class B common stock is entitled to one vote per share, and Class C common stock is entitled to ten votes per share. Shares of our Class B common stock are convertible into an equivalent number of shares of our Class A common stock and generally convert into shares of our Class A common stock upon transfer. Shares of our Class C common stock are convertible into an equivalent number of shares of our Class B common stock and generally convert into shares of our Class B common stock upon transfer. Any dividends paid to the holders of the Class A common stock, Class B common stock, and Class C common stock will be paid on a pro rata basis. For the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, we did not declare any dividends. On a liquidation event, as defined in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, any distribution to common stockholders is made on a pro rata basis to the holders of the Class A common stock, Class B common stock, and Class C common stock.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, there were 883,021,9911,160,127,014 shares, 122,563,92024,521,607 shares, and 216,615,870231,147,476 shares of Class A common stock, Class B common stock, and Class C common stock, respectively, issued and outstanding.

Stock-based Compensation Plans

We maintain three3 share-based employee compensation plans: the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (“2017 Plan”), the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (“2014 Plan”), and the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (“2012 Plan”, and collectively with the 2017 Plan and the 2014 Plan, the “Stock Plans”). In January 2017, our board of directors adopted the 2017 Plan, and in February 2017 our stockholders approved the 2017 Plan, effective on March 1, 2017, which serves as the successor to the 2014 Plan and 2012 Plan and provides for the grant of incentive stock options to employees, including employees of any parent or subsidiary, and for the grant of nonstatutory stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, performance stock awards, performance cash awards, and other forms of stock awards to employees, directors, and consultants, including employees and consultants of our affiliates. We do not expect to grant any additional awards under the 2014 Plan or 2012 Plan as of the effective date of the 2017 Plan, other than awards for up to 2,500,000 shares of Class A common stock to our employees and consultants in France under the 2014 Plan. Outstanding awards under the 2014 Plan and 2012 Plan continue to be subject to the terms and conditions of the 2014 Plan and 2012 Plan, respectively. Shares available for grant under the 2014 Plan and 2012 Plan, which were reserved but not issued or subject to outstanding awards under the 2014 Plan or 2012 Plan, respectively, as of the effective date of the 2017 Plan, were added to the reserves of the 2017 Plan.

We initially reserved 87,270,108 shares of our Class A common stock for future issuance under the 2017 Plan. An additional number of shares of Class A common stock will be added to the 2017 Plan equal to (i) 96,993,064 shares of Class A common stock reserved for future issuance pursuant to outstanding stock options and unvested RSUs under the 2014 Plan, (ii) 37,228,865 shares of Class A common stock issuable on conversion of Class B common stock underlying stock options and unvested RSUs outstanding under the 2012 Plan, (iii) 17,858,235 shares of Class A common stock that were reserved for issuance under the 2014 Plan as of the date the 2017 Plan became effective, (iv) 11,004,580 shares of Class A common stock issuable on conversion of Class B common stock that were reserved for issuance under the 2012 Plan as of the date the 2017 Plan became effective, and (v) a maximum of 86,737,997 shares of Class A common stock that will be added pursuant to the following sentence. With respect to each share that returns to the 2017 Plan pursuant to (i) and (ii) of the prior sentence that was associated with an award that was outstanding under the 2014 Plan and 2012 Plan as of October 31, 2016, an additional share of Class A common stock will be added to the share reserve of the 2017 Plan, up to a maximum of 86,737,997 shares. The number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2017 Plan will increase automatically on the first


day of January 1st of each ofcalendar year, beginning on January 1, 2018 through January 1, 2027, by the lesser of (i) 5% of the total number of shares of our capital stock outstanding on December 31st of the immediately preceding calendar year, and (ii) a number determined by our board of directors. The maximum term for stock options granted under the 2017 Plan may not exceed ten years from the date of grant. The 2017 Plan will terminate ten years from the date our board of directors approved the plan, unless it is terminated earlier by our board of directors.


In July 2017, we acquired Placed, Inc. (“Placed”), a location-based measurement services company. See Note 4 for additional information. In connection with the Placed acquisition, we assumed certain outstanding stock options under Placed, Inc.’s 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended. Additionally, we granted shares of restricted stock, which were not issued under any existing Placed equity incentive plans or the Stock Plans, and that will settle in shares of Class A common stock.

2017 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In January 2017, our board of directors adopted the 2017 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“2017 ESPP”). Our stockholders approved the 2017 ESPP in February 2017. The 2017 ESPP became effective in connection with the IPO. A total of 16,484,690 shares of Class A common stock were initially reserved for issuance under the 2017 ESPP. NoNaN shares of our Class A common stock have been purchasedissued or offered under the 2017 ESPP. The number of shares of our Class A common stock reserved for issuance will automatically increase on January 1st of each calendar year, beginning on January 1, 2018 through January 1, 2027, by the lesser of (1)(i) 1.0% of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding on the last day of the calendar month before the date of the automatic increase, and (2)(ii) 15,000,000 shares; provided that before the date of any such increase, our board of directors may determine that such increase will be less than the amount set forth in clauses (1)(i) and (2)(ii).

Restricted Stock Units

The following table summarizes the restricted stockRSU award activity during the year ended December 31, 2017:2019:

 

 

Class A

Outstanding

Restricted Stock

 

 

Class B

Outstanding

Restricted Stock

 

 

Weighted-

Average

Grant Date

Fair Value per

Restricted Stock

 

 

Class A

Outstanding

RSUs

 

 

Class B

Outstanding

RSUs

 

 

Weighted-

Average

Grant Date

Fair Value

per RSU

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Unvested at December 31, 2016

 

 

152,114

 

 

 

28,581

 

 

$

15.50

 

Unvested at December 31, 2018

 

 

149,638

 

 

 

492

 

 

$

13.34

 

Granted(1)

 

 

66,762

 

 

 

 

 

$

16.37

 

 

 

89,582

 

 

 

 

 

$

11.00

 

Vested

 

 

(45,026

)

 

 

(18,912

)

 

$

15.08

 

 

 

(76,983

)

 

 

(490

)

 

$

12.10

 

Forfeited

 

 

(17,845

)

 

 

(1,878

)

 

$

16.59

 

 

 

(21,622

)

 

 

(2

)

 

$

13.15

 

Unvested at December 31, 2017

 

 

156,005

 

 

 

7,791

 

 

$

15.89

 

Unvested at December 31, 2019

 

 

140,615

 

 

 

 

 

$

12.57

 

 

(1)

Includes 1.5 million restricted stock granted in connection with acquisitions.

The total fair value of RSUs vested during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 2016, and 2015 was $967.6$937.2 million, $11.8$884.1 million, and $4.4$966.0 million, respectively.

Total unrecognized compensation cost related to Pre-2017 RSUs was $620.0$34.5 million as of December 31, 20172019 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.50.8 years. Total unrecognized compensation cost related to Post-2017 RSUs including awards granted in connection with the Placed acquisition, was $809.5 million$1.4 billion as of December 31, 20172019 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 4.22.9 years.

ForAdditionally, we have 9.4 million and 22.4 million RSUs that are vested but have not yet settled as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. These RSUs are primarily related to the CEO award.

Restricted Stock Awards

The following table summarizes the RSA activity during the year ended December 31, 2019:

 

 

 

 

Class A

Outstanding

RSAs

 

 

Weighted-

Average

Grant Date

Fair Value

per RSA

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Unvested at December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

8,134

 

 

$

7.51

 

Granted

 

 

 

 

3,975

 

 

$

12.61

 

Vested

 

 

 

 

(2,778

)

 

$

9.90

 

Forfeited

 

 

 

 

(1,149

)

 

$

5.85

 

Unvested at December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

8,182

 

 

$

9.42

 

The total fair value of RSAs vested during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 for RSUs issuedwas $27.5 million, $6.3 million, and $1.6 million, respectively. 

Total unrecognized compensation cost related to employees, we withheld 25.3RSAs was $74.2 million sharesas of common stock by net settlementDecember 31, 2019 and remitted $394.2 million in cashis expected to meet the related tax withholding requirements on behalfbe recognized over a weighted-average period of our employees. Beginning in November 2017, in connection with the vesting of a majority of employee RSUs, we sold a portion of the shares that vested on behalf of employees to satisfy tax withholding and remittance obligations. We will continue to evaluate the method of settlement of RSUs that vest in the future.3.3 years.


Stock Options

The following table summarizes the stock option award activity under the Stock Plans during the year ended December 31, 2017:2019:

 

 

 

Class A

Number

of Shares

 

 

Class B

Number

of Shares

 

 

Weighted-

Average

Exercise Price

 

 

Weighted-

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Term (in years)

 

 

Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value(1)

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

 

 

23,718

 

 

 

21,186

 

 

$

1.13

 

 

 

6.97

 

 

$

682,565

 

Granted and assumed(2)

 

 

7,027

 

 

 

 

 

$

13.62

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Exercised

 

 

(9,928

)

 

 

(9,396

)

 

$

0.59

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Forfeited

 

 

(10

)

 

 

 

 

$

0.77

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

 

 

20,807

 

 

 

11,790

 

 

$

4.10

 

 

 

4.99

 

 

$

343,110

 

Exercisable at December 31, 2017

 

 

17,326

 

 

 

11,302

 

 

$

4.10

 

 

 

4.54

 

 

$

301,587

 

Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2017

 

 

20,798

 

 

 

11,787

 

 

$

4.10

 

 

 

4.98

 

 

$

343,077

 

 

 

Class A

Number

of Shares

 

 

Class B

Number

of Shares

 

 

Weighted-

Average

Exercise

Price

 

 

Weighted-

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Term

(in years)

 

 

Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value(1)

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2018

 

 

13,322

 

 

 

2,969

 

 

$

7.83

 

 

 

6.41

 

 

$

34,567

 

Granted

 

 

118

 

 

 

 

 

$

14.69

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Exercised

 

 

(3,291

)

 

 

(1,389

)

 

$

3.53

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Forfeited

 

 

(1,437

)

 

 

(30

)

 

$

13.87

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2019

 

 

8,712

 

 

 

1,550

 

 

$

9.00

 

 

 

5.59

 

 

$

75,460

 

Exercisable at December 31, 2019

 

 

6,053

 

 

 

1,550

 

 

$

8.00

 

 

 

4.65

 

 

$

63,445

 

Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2019

 

 

8,508

 

 

 

1,550

 

 

$

8.91

 

 

 

5.54

 

 

$

74,825

 

 

(1)

The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying stock option awards and the assessed fair value of our common stock as of December 31, 2016 or the closing market price of our Class A common stock as of December 31, 2017.

(2)

Amount includes assumed options from Placed, Inc.’s 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended.2018 and December 31, 2019, respectively.

The weighted-average fair value of employee stock options granted and assumed during the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 was $5.84$14.69 and $15.10$6.99 per share, respectively which reflectsrespectively. The expense is estimated based on the post-Stock Split per share value.option’s fair value as calculated by the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Stock-based compensation expense for stock options was not material in the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017.

Total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options was $35.7$17.7 million as of December 31, 20172019 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.32.0 years.

We did not grant any stock options in 2015. The total grant date fair value of stock options that vested in the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 2016, and 2015 was $58.6$23.3 million, $15.5$24.8 million, and $24.6$58.6 million, respectively. The intrinsic value of stock options exercised in the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 2016,was $44.0 million, $289.1 million, and 2015 was $276.5 million, $21.6 million, and $1.8 million, respectively.

Stock-based compensation expense for stock options granted to employees and non-employees is estimated based on the option’s fair value as calculated by the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes model requires various assumptions, including the fair value of our common stock, expected life, expected dividend yield and expected volatility. If any of the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model change significantly, stock-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the current period. The expected term of options represents the period that our stock-based awards are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield currently available on U.S. treasury notes with terms approximately equal to the expected life of the option. The expected dividend rate is zero as we currently have no history or expectation of declaring cash dividends on our common stock.

The weighted-average assumptions used to determine the fair value of employee stock options granted and assumed during the year ended December 31, 2017 were as follows:

Expected term from grant date (in years)

 

 

3.0

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

 

1.9

%

Expected volatility

 

 

51

%

Dividend yield

 

 

0

%

Strike price

 

$

13.62

 


Stock-Based Compensation Expense

Total stock-based compensation expense by function iswas as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

(in thousands)

 

(in thousands)

 

Cost of revenue

 

$

26,071

 

 

$

532

 

 

$

488

 

$

6,365

 

 

$

4,393

 

 

$

26,071

 

Research and development

 

 

1,154,430

 

 

 

21,935

 

 

 

10,309

 

 

464,639

 

 

 

340,533

 

 

 

1,154,430

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

236,474

 

 

 

3,956

 

 

 

3,534

 

 

93,355

 

 

 

84,059

 

 

 

236,474

 

General and administrative

 

 

1,222,920

 

 

 

5,419

 

 

 

59,193

 

 

121,654

 

 

 

109,226

 

 

 

1,222,920

 

Total

 

$

2,639,895

 

 

$

31,842

 

 

$

73,524

 

$

686,013

 

 

$

538,211

 

 

$

2,639,895

 


5. Business Acquisitions and Divestitures

2019 Acquisitions and Divestiture

AI Factory, Inc.

In December 2019, we acquired the remaining ownership interest in AI Factory, Inc. (“AI Factory”), a content and technology company. Prior to the acquisition, we owned a minority interest in the company. The purpose of the acquisition was to enhance the functionality of our platform.

The acquisition date fair value of AI Factory was $128.1 million, which primarily represents current and future cash consideration payments to sellers, as well as the $13.5 million estimated fair value of our original minority interest. We recognized the change in pre-acquisition fair value of our original minority interest as a gain in Other income (expense), net on the consolidated statement of operations. The allocation of acquisition date fair value is preliminary and is subject to additional information related to the assets and liabilities that existed as of the acquisition date.

The preliminary allocation of acquisition date fair value is estimated as follows:

 

 

Total

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Technology

 

$

16,000

 

Goodwill

 

 

110,734

 

Other assets acquired and liabilities assumed, net

 

 

1,353

 

Total

 

$

128,087

 

 

4. BusinessThe goodwill amount represents synergies related to our existing platform expected to be realized from this business combination and assembled workforce. The associated goodwill and intangible assets are not deductible for tax purposes. 

Placed, LLC

In June 2019, we divested our membership interest in Placed, LLC (“Placed”), a location-based measurement services company, to Foursquare Labs, Inc. (“Foursquare”). The total cash consideration received was $77.8 million, which includes amounts paid for severance and equity compensation. $66.9 million represents purchase consideration and we recognized a net gain on divestiture of $39.9 million, which is included in other income (expense), net, on our consolidated statements of operations. The operating results of Placed were not material to our consolidated revenue or consolidated operating loss for all periods presented. We determined that Placed did not meet the criteria to be classified as discontinued operations.

Placed assets and liabilities on completion of the divestiture were as follows:

 

Total

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Trademarks, net

$

1,052

 

Technology, net

 

14,193

 

Customer relationships, net

 

5,246

 

Goodwill

 

2,682

 

Other assets and liabilities, net

 

3,827

 

Total

$

27,000

 

Other Acquisitions

In the fourth quarter of 2019, we acquired a business to enhance our existing platform, technology, and workforce. The purchase consideration was $34.0 million of which $23.5 million was allocated to goodwill and the remainder primarily to identifiable intangible assets. The goodwill amount represents synergies related to our existing platform expected to be realized from this business combination and assembled workforce. The associated goodwill and intangible assets are deductible for tax purposes.


Additional Information on 2019 Acquisitions

For all acquisitions in 2019, we will grant a combined $71.3 million in the form of RSUs to certain continuing employees in exchange for future service. 

In addition, unaudited pro forma results of operations assuming the above acquisitions had taken place at the beginning of each period are not provided because the historical operating results of the acquired entities were not material and pro forma results would not be materially different from reported results for the periods presented.

2018 Acquisitions

Acquisitions were not material for the year ended December 31, 2018.

2017 Acquisitions

Placed, Inc.

In July 2017, we acquired Placed (originally Placed, Inc. (“Placed”), a location-based measurement services company.. The purpose of the acquisition was to enhance our measurement capabilities. The total consideration was $185.9 million, of which $139.6 million represents purchase consideration and includes $135.2 million in cash paid to sellers, $3.9 million for the fair value of assumed options, and $0.5 million of liabilities due to the sellers. The remaining $46.3 million of total consideration transferred represents compensation for future employment services. The allocation of purchase price is preliminary and is subject to additional information related to the liabilities that existed as of the acquisition date.

The preliminary allocation of the total purchase consideration for this acquisition is estimated as follows:

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Cash

 

$

6,919

 

Trademarks

 

 

2,700

 

Technology

 

 

22,400

 

Customer relationships

 

 

11,800

 

Goodwill

 

 

103,995

 

Net deferred tax liability

 

 

(13,520

)

Other assets acquired and liabilities assumed, net

 

 

5,296

 

Total

 

$

139,590

 

 

The goodwill amount represents synergies related to our existing platform expected to be realized from this business combination and assembled workforce. The associated goodwill and intangible assets are not deductible for tax purposes.

Zenly SAS

In May 2017, we acquired Zenly, SAS, a company that develops a location-based application that allows users to see where their friends are on a map. The purpose of the acquisition was to enhance the functionality of our platform. The total consideration paid was $213.3 million in cash, of which $196.1 million represents purchase consideration and includes $186.8 million in cash paid to the sellers and $9.3 million of liabilities due to the sellers. The remaining $17.2 million of total consideration transferred represents compensation for future employment services.


The allocation of the total purchase consideration for this acquisition is estimated as follows:

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Cash

 

$

22,610

 

Technology

 

 

23,000

 

Goodwill

 

 

154,353

 

Net deferred tax liability

 

 

(2,418

)

Other assets acquired and liabilities assumed, net

 

 

(1,428

)

Total

 

$

196,117

 

 


The goodwill amount represents synergies related to our existing platform expected to be realized from this business combination and assembled workforce. The associated goodwill and intangible assets arewere not deductible for tax purposes.purposes as of the acquisition date.

Other Acquisitions

In March 2017, we acquired all outstanding shares of a company that operates a cloud hosted platform for building content online. The company was acquired to enhance the functionality of our platform. In June 2017, we acquired a component of a business from a social advertising software company that was integrated with our existing advertising platform and adds advertising tools to our advertising customers. In the fourth quarter 2017, we acquired several companies to enhance our existing platform, technology, and workforce. The total purchase consideration for these other acquisitions was $101.9 million, which included $95.3 million in cash and $6.6 million recorded in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

The preliminary allocation of the total purchase consideration for the above other acquisitions in 2017 is as follows:

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Cash

 

$

1,701

 

Technology

 

 

49,325

 

Customer relationships

 

 

2,100

 

Goodwill

 

 

48,408

 

Net deferred tax liability

 

 

(1,976

)

Other assets acquired and liabilities assumed, net

 

 

2,382

 

Total

 

$

101,940

 

 

The goodwill amount represents synergies related to our existing platform expected to be realized from these business combinations and assembled workforce. Of the technology intangible assets, customer relationships, and goodwill in the above table, $40.1 million, $1.6 million, and $30.3 million, is deductible for tax purposes, respectively.

Additional Information on 2017 Acquisitions

For all acquisitions in 2017, we provided for a combined $171.1 million in the form of RSUs and RSAs to certain continuing employees of the companies in exchange for future service.

In addition, unaudited pro forma results of operations assuming the above acquisitions had taken place at the beginning of each period are not provided because the historical operating results of the acquired entities were not material and pro forma results would not be materially different from reported results for the periods presented.

2016 Acquisitions

Bitstrips

In March 2016, we acquired all outstanding shares of Bitstrips Inc. (“Bitstrips”), a web and mobile application that allows users to create a personal avatar. The total purchase consideration was $64.2 million, which includes $46.6 million in cash and $11.6 million in shares of our non-voting Class A common stock. Of the total purchase consideration, $6.0 million was recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.


The allocation of the total purchase consideration for the acquisition of Bitstrips is as follows:

 

 

Total

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Technology

 

$

15,700

 

Customer relationships

 

 

1,600

 

Goodwill

 

 

52,671

 

Net deferred tax liability

 

 

(4,585

)

Other assets acquired and liabilities assumed, net

 

 

(1,162

)

Total

 

$

64,224

 

The goodwill amount represents synergies related to our existing platform expected to be realized from this business combination and assembled workforce. The associated goodwill and intangible assets are not deductible for tax purposes.

Other Acquisitions

In August 2016, we acquired all outstanding shares of a mobile search company. The total purchase consideration was $114.5 million, which includes $21.0 million in cash and $83.0 million in shares of our non-voting Class A common stock. Of the total purchase consideration, $10.5 million was recorded in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.

The allocation of the total purchase consideration for the acquisition is as follows:

 

 

Total

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Technology

 

$

19,400

 

Goodwill

 

 

98,826

 

Net deferred tax liability

 

 

(7,112

)

Other assets acquired and liabilities assumed, net

 

 

3,421

 

Total

 

$

114,535

 

The goodwill amount represents synergies related to our existing platform expected to be realized from this business combination and assembled workforce. The associated goodwill and intangible assets are not deductible for tax purposes.

In addition, in 2016, we acquired all outstanding shares of a research and development-driven computer vision software company and substantially all of the assets of various companies that specialize in the areas of software and advertising technologies. Each of the acquisitions constituted a business. The total consideration transferred for these acquisitions was $47.0 million. Of the total purchase consideration, $4.6 million was recorded in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. The allocation of the total purchase consideration for the above mentioned acquisitions is as follows:

 

 

Total

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Technology

 

$

12,300

 

Goodwill

 

 

35,266

 

Net deferred tax liability

 

 

(500

)

Other assets acquired and liabilities assumed, net

 

 

(97

)

Total

 

$

46,969

 

The goodwill amount represents synergies related to our existing platform expected to be realized from these business combinations and assembled workforce. Of the technology intangible assets and goodwill in the above table, $9.8 million and $30.7 million is deductible for tax purposes, respectively.

Additional Information on 2016 Acquisitions

In connection with the acquisitions completed during the year ended December 31, 2016, we also agreed to provide additional consideration of $255.2 million, in both stock and cash, to certain employees of the acquired entities contingent on their continued employment with us.


2015 Acquisitions

Looksery

In April 2015, we acquired Looksery, Inc. (“Looksery”). Looksery is a mobile video communication company that specializes in creating lenses for use within applications and was acquired to enhance the functionality of our platform. The total purchase consideration was $79.4 million. In addition to the purchase consideration, we provided for an additional $71.2 million, of which $43.6 million is in the form of restricted stock units to employees for future services. The remaining $27.6 million relates to cash payments, a portion of which was paid at the acquisition close and the remainder will be paid to employees for future services over the four years after the transaction. We also incurred $16.4 million in transaction-related costs, which are included in general and administrative expense in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2015.

The allocation of the total purchase consideration for the acquisition of Looksery is as follows:

 

 

Total

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Technology

 

$

18,800

 

Customer relationships

 

 

2,200

 

Goodwill

 

 

64,433

 

Net deferred tax liability

 

 

(7,700

)

Other assets acquired and liabilities assumed, net

 

 

1,692

 

Total

 

$

79,425

 

The goodwill amount represents synergies related to our existing platform expected to be realized from this business combination and assembled workforce. The associated goodwill and intangible assets are not deductible for tax purposes.

5.6. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 were as follows:

 

 

Goodwill

 

Goodwill

 

 

(in thousands)

 

(in thousands)

 

Balance as of December 31, 2015

 

$

133,944

 

Balance as of December 31, 2017

$

639,882

 

Goodwill acquired

 

 

186,763

 

 

741

 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

(1,570

)

$

(8,253

)

Balance as of December 31, 2016

 

$

319,137

 

Balance as of December 31, 2018

$

632,370

 

Goodwill acquired

 

 

306,756

 

 

134,255

 

Goodwill divested

 

(2,682

)

Foreign currency translation

 

 

13,989

 

 

(2,790

)

Balance as of December 31, 2017

 

$

639,882

 

Balance as of December 31, 2019

$

761,153

 

 


Intangible assets consisted of the following:

 

 

December 31, 2017

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

Weighted-

Average

Remaining

Useful Life -

Years

 

 

Gross

Carrying

Amount

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

Net

 

Weighted-

Average

Remaining

Useful Life -

Years

 

 

Gross

Carrying

Amount

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

Net

 

 

(in thousands except years)

 

(in thousands, except years)

 

Domain names

 

 

2.1

 

 

$

5,418

 

 

$

3,210

 

 

$

2,208

 

 

2.6

 

 

$

5,414

 

 

$

5,200

 

 

$

214

 

Trademarks

 

 

2.3

 

 

 

5,772

 

 

 

2,701

 

 

 

3,071

 

 

 

 

 

3,072

 

 

 

3,072

 

 

 

 

Acquired developed technology

 

 

4.7

 

 

 

180,396

 

 

 

45,435

 

 

 

134,961

 

 

3.6

 

 

 

175,414

 

 

 

95,921

 

 

 

79,493

 

Customer relationships

 

 

2.6

 

 

 

15,558

 

 

 

3,506

 

 

 

12,052

 

 

 

 

 

2,172

 

 

 

2,172

 

 

 

 

Patents

 

 

7.8

 

 

 

17,150

 

 

 

2,969

 

 

 

14,181

 

 

5.9

 

 

 

19,710

 

 

 

7,296

 

 

 

12,414

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

224,294

 

 

$

57,821

 

 

$

166,473

 

 

 

 

 

$

205,782

 

 

$

113,661

 

 

$

92,121

 

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

Weighted-

Average

Remaining

Useful Life -

Years

 

 

Gross

Carrying

Amount

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

Net

 

Weighted-

Average

Remaining

Useful Life -

Years

 

 

Gross

Carrying

Amount

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

Net

 

 

(in thousands except years)

 

(in thousands except years)

 

Domain names

 

 

3.0

 

 

$

5,000

 

 

$

2,157

 

 

$

2,843

 

 

1.6

 

 

$

5,414

 

 

$

4,283

 

 

$

1,131

 

Trademarks

 

 

2.6

 

 

 

3,072

 

 

 

1,829

 

 

 

1,243

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

5,772

 

 

 

4,076

 

 

 

1,696

 

Non-compete agreements

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

243

 

 

 

226

 

 

 

17

 

Acquired developed technology

 

 

4.1

 

 

 

83,137

 

 

 

20,569

 

 

 

62,568

 

 

3.8

 

 

 

179,791

 

 

 

78,729

 

 

 

101,062

 

Customer relationships

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

3,752

 

 

 

2,569

 

 

 

1,183

 

 

2.1

 

 

 

15,572

 

 

 

8,012

 

 

 

7,560

 

Patents

 

 

9.2

 

 

 

9,450

 

 

 

1,322

 

 

 

8,128

 

 

6.9

 

 

 

19,710

 

 

 

5,105

 

 

 

14,605

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

104,654

 

 

$

28,672

 

 

$

75,982

 

 

 

 

 

$

226,259

 

 

$

100,205

 

 

$

126,054

 

 

Amortization of intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 2016, and 2015 was $31.5$33.4 million, $16.2$42.6 million, and $9.5$31.5 million, respectively.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, the estimated intangible asset amortization expense for the next five years and thereafter is as follows:

 

 

Estimated

Amortization

 

Estimated

Amortization

 

 

(in thousands)

 

(in thousands)

 

Year ending December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

$

42,420

 

2019

 

 

38,488

 

2020

 

 

31,999

 

$

29,171

 

2021

 

 

24,967

 

 

23,545

 

2022

 

 

15,134

 

 

16,879

 

2023

 

14,396

 

2024

 

6,236

 

Thereafter

 

 

13,465

 

 

1,894

 

Total

 

$

166,473

 

$

92,121

 

 

6. Commitments7. Long-Term Debt

Convertible Notes

In August 2019, we entered into a purchase agreement with certain counterparties for the sale of an aggregate of $1.265 billion principal amount of the Convertible Notes in a private offering to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The Convertible Notes consisted of a $1.1 billion initial placement and Contingenciesan over-allotment option that provided the initial purchasers of the Convertible Notes with the option to purchase an additional $165.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes, which was fully exercised. The Convertible Notes were issued pursuant to an Indenture, dated August 9, 2019 (the “Indenture”). The net proceeds from the


issuance of the Convertible Notes were $1.15 billion, net of debt issuance costs and cash used to purchase the capped call transactions (“Capped Call Transactions”) discussed below.

CommitmentsThe Convertible Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations. Interest is payable in cash semi-annually in arrears beginning on February 1, 2020 at a rate of 0.75% per year. The Convertible Notes mature on August 1, 2026 unless repurchased, redeemed, or converted in accordance with the terms prior to such date.

LeasesThe Convertible Notes are convertible into cash, shares of our Class A common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of our Class A common stock, at our election, at an initial conversion rate of 43.8481 shares of Class A common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $22.81 (the “Conversion Price”) per share of our Class A common stock. The conversion rate is subject to customary adjustments for certain events as described in the Indenture.

We entered into various non-cancelable lease agreementsmay redeem for certaincash all or any portion of the Convertible Notes, at our option, on or after August 6, 2023 if the last reported sale price of our offices with original lease periods expiring between 2017 and 2027. CertainClass A common stock has been at least 130% of the arrangements have free rent periodsConversion Price then in effect for at least 20 trading days at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Convertible Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

Holders of the Convertible Notes may convert all or escalating rent payment provisions.a portion of their Convertible Notes at their option prior to May 1, 2026, in multiples of $1,000 principal amounts, only under the following circumstances:

during any calendar quarter commencing after December 31, 2019, if the last reported sale price of our Class A common stock for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) during the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding calendar quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the applicable conversion price of the Convertible Notes on each such trading day;

during the five business day period after any 10 consecutive trading day period in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of the Convertible Notes for each day of that ten consecutive trading day period was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of our Class A common stock and the applicable conversion rate of the Convertible Notes on such trading day;

on a notice of redemption, in which case we may be required to increase the conversion rate for the Convertible Notes so surrendered for conversion in connection with such redemption notice; or

on the occurrence of specified corporate events.

On or after May 1, 2026, the Convertible Notes are convertible at any time until the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date.


Holders of the Convertible Notes who convert in connection with a make-whole fundamental change, as defined in the Indenture, or in connection with a redemption are entitled to an increase in the conversion rate. Additionally, in the event of a fundamental change, holders of the Convertible Notes may require us to repurchase all or a portion of the Convertible Notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of Convertible Notes, plus any accrued and unpaid interest, including any additional interest.

In accounting for the issuance of the Convertible Notes, we separated the Convertible Notes into liability and equity components. The carrying amount of the equity component was $381.5 million and was recorded as a debt discount, which is amortized to interest expense at an effective interest rate of 6.22%. We recognize rentallocated $4.1 million of debt issuance costs to the equity component and the remaining debt issuance costs of $9.5 million were allocated to the liability component, which are amortized to interest expense under such arrangements on a straight-line basis.the effective interest rate method. The equity component of the Convertible Notes will not be remeasured as long as it continues to meet the conditions for equity classification.

Our future minimum lease payments required under these non-cancelable operating lease obligationsThe Convertible Notes consisted of the following as of December 31, 2017, are as follows:2019:

 

 

 

Operating

Leases

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Year ending December 31,

 

 

 

 

2018

 

$

49,649

 

2019

 

 

59,860

 

2020

 

 

60,129

 

2021

 

 

58,552

 

2022

 

 

47,372

 

Thereafter

 

 

144,440

 

Total minimum lease payments

 

$

420,002

 


Operating lease expenses for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 were $53.2 million, $26.9 million, and $11.3 million, respectively.

We have several lease agreements where we are deemed the owner under build-to-suit lease accounting. The value of the leased property and corresponding financing obligations are included in property and equipment, net and other liabilities, respectively, on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017. Our future minimum lease payments required under non-cancelable financing lease obligations, which exclusively relate to our build-to-suit leases, as of December 31, 2017, are as follows:

 

 

Financing

Leases

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Year ending December 31,

 

 

 

 

2018

 

$

4,726

 

2019

 

 

4,796

 

2020

 

 

4,947

 

2021

 

 

5,092

 

2022

 

 

5,167

 

Thereafter

 

 

20,785

 

Total minimum lease payments

 

$

45,513

 

 

Amount

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Liability:

 

 

 

Principal

$

1,265,000

 

Unamortized debt discount and issuance costs

 

(373,224

)

Net carrying amount

$

891,776

 

Carrying amount of the equity component

$

377,432

 

 

We recognize an increase in value of the asset as additional building costs are incurred during the construction period and a corresponding increase in the lease financing obligation for any construction costs to be reimbursed by the landlord. As of December 31, 2017, $16.0 million2019, the debt discount and debt issuance costs on the Convertible Notes will be amortized over the remaining period of lease financing obligationsapproximately 6.6 years.

The following table details interest expense recognized related to the Convertible Notes for the year ended December 31, 2019:

 

Amount

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Contractual interest expense

$

3,723

 

Amortization of debt issuance costs

 

433

 

Amortization of debt discount

 

17,364

 

Total

$

21,520

 

As of December 31, 2019, the if-converted value of the Convertible Notes did not exceed the principal amount. 

Capped Call Transactions

In connection with the pricing of the Convertible Notes, we entered into separate Capped Call Transactions with certain counterparties at a net cost of $102.1 million. The cap price of the Capped Call Transactions is initially $32.58 per share of our Class A common stock, representing a premium of 100% above the last reported sale price of $16.29 per share of our Class A common stock on August 6, 2019, and is subject to certain adjustments under the terms of the Capped Call Transactions. Conditions that cause adjustments to the initial strike price of the Capped Call Transactions mirror conditions that result in corresponding adjustments for the Convertible Notes.

The Capped Call Transactions are includedintended to reduce potential dilution to holders of our Class A common stock beyond the conversion price of $22.81, up to $32.58, on any conversion of the Convertible Notes or offset any cash payments we are required to make in other liabilities onexcess of the principal amount of such converted Convertible Notes, as the case may be, with such reduction or offset subject to a cap. The cost of the Capped Call Transactions was recorded as a reduction of our additional paid-in capital in our consolidated balance sheets.

Contractual

Credit Facility

In July 2016, we entered into a five-year senior unsecured revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”) with lenders, some of which are affiliated with certain members of the underwriting syndicate for our IPO and convertible note offering,


that allows us to borrow up to $1.1 billion to fund working capital and general corporate-purpose expenditures. The loan bears interest at LIBO plus 0.75%, as well as an annual commitment fee of 0.10% on the daily undrawn balance of the facility. NaN origination fees were incurred at the closing of the Credit Facility. In December 2016, the amount we are permitted to borrow under the Credit Facility was increased to $1.2 billion. In February 2018, the amount we are permitted to borrow under the Credit Facility was increased to $1.25 billion. In August 2018, we amended the Credit Facility to extend the term to August 2023 with respect to an aggregate of $1.05 billion of the $1.25 billion that we may borrow under the Credit Facility. In August 2019, we amended the Credit Facility to revise the covenants that restrict the repurchase of equity securities and the incurrence of indebtedness to permit the Capped Call Transactions and issuance of the Convertible Notes.As of December 31, 2019, 0 amounts were outstanding under the Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2019, we had $25.5 million in the form of outstanding standby letters of credit.

8. Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments

We have non-cancelable contractual agreements related to the hosting of our data storage processing, storage, and other computing services.

In January 2017, we entered into the Google Cloud Platform License Agreement, which was amended in September 2017 and again in December 2017.Agreement. Under the agreement, we were granted a license to access and use certain cloud services. The agreement has an initial term of five years and we are required to purchase at least $400.0 million of cloud services in each year of the agreement. For each of the first four years, up to 15% of this amount may be moved to a subsequent year. If we fail to meet the minimum purchase commitment during any year, we are required to pay the difference.

In March 2016, we entered into the AWS Enterprise Agreement for the use of cloud services from Amazon Web Services, Inc. (“AWS”), which was amended in March 2016 and again in February 2017. The agreement will continue indefinitely until terminated by either party.. Under the February 2017 addendum to the agreement, as amended, we are committed to spend $1.0an aggregate of $1.1 billion between January 2017 and December 20212022 on AWS services ($50.0 million in 2017, $125.090.0 million in 2018, $200.0$150.0 million in 2019, $275.0$215.0 million in 2020, and $350.0$280.0 million in 2021)2021, and $349.0 million in 2022). If we fail to meet the minimum purchase commitment during any year, we are required to pay the difference. Any such payment may be applied to future use of AWS services during the addendum term, although it will not count towards meeting the future minimum purchase commitments under the addendum.commitments.

We also have various other non-cancelable contractual commitments related to purchase agreements. During the third quarter of 2017, based on management’s updated assessment, we recorded $39.9 million of charges related to Spectacles inventory. The charges were primarily related to excess inventory reserves and inventory purchase commitment cancellation charges. As of December 31, 2017, there are no material hardware inventory commitments.


The future minimum contractual commitment including commitments less than one year, as of December 31, 20172019 for each of the next five years are as follows:

 

 

Minimum

Commitment

 

Minimum

Commitment

 

 

(in thousands)

 

(in thousands)

 

Year ending December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

$

533,704

 

2019

 

 

604,427

 

2020

 

 

675,055

 

$

640,957

 

2021

 

 

750,000

 

 

684,374

 

2022

 

 

33,333

 

 

384,596

 

2023

 

883

 

2024

 

883

 

Thereafter

 

 

 

 

214

 

Total minimum lease payments

 

$

2,596,519

 

Total minimum commitments

$

1,711,907

 

 

Contingencies

We record a loss contingency when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. We also disclose material contingencies when we believe a loss is not probable but reasonably possible. Accounting for contingencies requires us to use judgment related to both the likelihood of a loss and the estimate of the amount or range of loss. Many legal and tax contingencies can take years to be resolved.

Pending Matters

Beginning in May 2017, we, certain of our officers and directors, and the underwriters for our IPO were named as defendants in securities class actions purportedly brought on behalf of purchasers of our Class A common stock, alleging violation of securities laws, in connection withthat arose following our IPO.


On January 17, 2020, we reached a preliminary agreement to settle the securities class actions. The preliminary settlement agreement was signed in January 2020 and provided for a resolution of all of the pending claims in the securities class actions for $187.5 million. In the fourth quarter of 2019, we recorded legal expense, net of amounts directly covered by insurance, of $100.0 million for the expected settlement of the stockholder actions since we concluded the loss was probable and estimable. The amount was recorded in general and administrative expense in our consolidated statements of operations. See Note 17 for additional discussion.

On April 3, 2018, BlackBerry Limited filed a lawsuit against us alleging that we infringe six of its patents. This lawsuit was recently dismissed after four of the patents were ruled to be invalid; however, Blackberry Limited has since appealed the ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Management believes we have meritorious defenses to these lawsuits areclaims.

In 2017, Vaporstream, Inc. filed a lawsuit against us alleging that we infringe a number of its patents. We filed a motion to dismiss, which the court denied without merit and intendsprejudice to vigorously defend them. Based onre-file after further factual development. Later in 2017, we filed a motion for summary judgment. On February 27, 2018, the preliminary naturecourt issued an order denying our motion for summary judgment. On June 13, 2018, the court stayed the lawsuit pending the outcome of several challenges to the validity of the proceedings in this case,patents, filed by us at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). On September 13, 2019, the court removed the stay with respect to several of Vaporstream's patents that the USPTO determined were not shown to be unpatentable. A trial date has been scheduled for early 2020. While management believes we have meritorious defenses to Vaporstream’s claims, the outcome of this matter remains uncertain.


The outcomes of our legal proceedings are inherently unpredictable, subject to significant uncertainties, and could be material to our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows for a particular period. For the pending mattermatters described above, it is not possible to estimate the reasonably possible loss or range of loss.

We are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business, including certain patent, trademark, privacy, regulatory, and privacyemployment matters. Although occasional adverse decisions or settlements may occur, we do not believe that the final disposition of any of our other pending matters will seriously harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Settlement

In September 2014, two individuals filed a lawsuit against us and our two founders in the Superior Court of California for Los Angeles County. The complaint alleged two causes of action—common-law right of publicity and statutory right of publicity—based on allegations that the defendants improperly used the plaintiffs’ images in promoting Snapchat for Android. In May 2017, the parties entered into a settlement agreement that resolved all claims among the parties. The settlement was not material. In June 2017, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal with the court.

Indemnifications

In the ordinary course of business, we may provide indemnifications of varying scope and terms to customers, vendors, lessors, investors, directors, officers, employees, and other parties with respect to certain matters. Indemnification may include losses from our breach of such agreements, services we provide, or third party intellectual property infringement claims. These indemnifications may survive termination of the underlying agreement and the maximum potential amount of future indemnification payments may not be subject to a cap. We have not incurred material costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnifications as of December 31, 2017.2019. We believe the fair value of these liabilities is immaterial and accordingly have no0 liabilities recorded for these agreements at December 31, 2017.2019.

9. Leases

We have various non-cancelable lease agreements for certain of our offices with original lease periods expiring between 2020 and 2032. Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain we will exercise that option. Certain of the arrangements have free rent periods or escalating rent payment provisions. Leases with an initial term of twelve months or less are not recorded on the consolidated balance sheets. We recognize rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Additionally, we sublease certain operating leases to third parties primarily as a result of moving to a centralized corporate office in Santa Monica, California in 2018.

Lease Cost

The components of lease cost were as follows:

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2019

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Operating lease expense

$

60,921

 

Sublease income

 

(4,716

)

Total net lease costs

$

56,205

 

Lease Term and Discount Rate

The weighted-average remaining lease term (in years) and discount rate related to the operating leases were as follows:

December 31, 2019

Weighted-average remaining lease term

8.1

Weighted-average discount rate

5.7

%

As most of our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the lease commencement date to determine the present value of lease payments.


7.Maturity of Lease Liabilities

The present value of our operating lease liabilities as of December 31, 2019 were as follows:

 

Operating Leases

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Year ending December 31,

 

 

 

2020

$

60,774

 

2021

 

64,822

 

2022

 

56,655

 

2023

 

52,754

 

2024

 

52,458

 

Thereafter

 

144,184

 

Total lease payments

$

431,647

 

Less: Imputed interest

 

(86,194

)

Present value of lease liabilities

$

345,453

 

As of December 31, 2019, we have additional operating leases for facilities that have not yet commenced with lease obligations of $13.8 million. These operating leases will commence between 2020 and 2024 with lease terms of greater than one year to five years. This table does not include lease payments that were not fixed at commencement or modification.

In 2018, we exited various operating leases prior to the end of the contractual lease term, primarily as a result of moving to a centralized corporate office located in Santa Monica, California. The charges, recorded as general and administrative expenses, primarily included the present value of our remaining lease obligation on the cease use dates that occurred during the period, net of estimated sublease income. As of December 31, 2018, we had exited all properties associated with this event. On January 1, 2019, under the transition provisions of ASU 2016-02 (Topic 842), we adjusted the initial measurement of the lease asset related to the lease exit properties by $32.1 million which represents the carrying amount of the associated lease exit liability as of December 31, 2018. Changes to our estimated sublease income, including actual contracted sublease income, may result in impairment of the right-of-use asset in the period determined.

Prior to January 1, 2019, we had several lease agreements where we were deemed the owner under build-to-suit lease accounting. The value of the leased property and corresponding financing obligations was included in property and equipment, net and other liabilities, respectively, on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2018. Net assets capitalized under build-to-suit leases were $48.4 million as of December 31, 2018. As part of the adoption of Topic 842, we derecognized those assets and liabilities and recorded the difference as an adjustment to accumulated deficit at January 1, 2019. These leases are included within the right-of-use asset and lease liability balances on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019.

Other Information

Cash payments included in the measurement of our operating lease liabilities were $66.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Lease liabilities arising from obtaining operating lease right-of-use assets were $35.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.

10. Fair Value Measurements

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are classified into the following categories:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting the reporting entity’s own assumptions or external inputs from inactive markets.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting the reporting entity’s own assumptions or external inputs from inactive markets.


We classify our cash equivalents and marketable securities within Level 1 or Level 2 because we use quoted market prices or alternative pricing sources and models utilizing market observable inputs to determine their fair value. We recognize transfers between levels within the fair value hierarchy, if any, at the end of each period. There were no0 transfers between levels during the periods presented.

We determine the fair value of our marketable securities using quoted market prices. The following table sets forth our financial assets as of December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period:

 

 

Fair Value

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

Cost or

Amortized Cost

 

 

Gross

Unrealized

Gains

 

 

Gross

Unrealized

Losses

 

 

Total Estimated

Fair Value

 

 

(in thousands)

 

(in thousands)

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

$

267,715

 

 

$

150,121

 

$

416,099

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

416,099

 

Level 1 securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government securities

 

 

25,861

 

 

 

 

 

1,305,145

 

 

 

604

 

 

 

(49

)

 

 

1,305,700

 

U.S. government agency securities

 

 

40,487

 

 

 

 

 

269,278

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

(32

)

 

 

269,294

 

Total cash and cash equivalents

 

$

334,063

 

 

$

150,121

 

Marketable securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government securities

 

$

1,350,581

 

 

$

505,333

 

U.S. government agency securities

 

 

358,395

 

 

 

331,914

 

Total marketable securities

 

$

1,708,976

 

 

$

837,247

 

Level 2 securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate debt securities

 

28,420

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

28,429

 

Commercial paper

 

84,498

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

84,498

 

Certificates of deposit

 

8,785

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,785

 

Total

$

2,112,225

 

 

$

665

 

 

$

(85

)

 

$

2,112,805

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

Cost or

Amortized Cost

 

 

Gross

Unrealized

Gains

 

 

Gross

Unrealized

Losses

 

 

Total Estimated

Fair Value

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Cash

$

279,950

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

279,950

 

Level 1 securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government securities

 

735,988

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

(175

)

 

 

735,825

 

U.S. government agency securities

 

181,032

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

(36

)

 

 

181,000

 

Level 2 securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate debt securities

 

35,819

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

(18

)

 

 

35,802

 

Commercial paper

 

33,193

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33,193

 

Certificates of deposit

 

13,293

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13,293

 

Total

$

1,279,275

 

 

$

17

 

 

$

(229

)

 

$

1,279,063

 

 

The amortized cost of U.S. government securities with maturities less than one year was $1.4 billion and $502.4 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The amortized cost of U.S. government securities with maturities between one and five years was zero and $3.0 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The amortized cost of U.S. government agency securities with maturities of less than a year was $358.6 million and $284.7 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The amortized cost of U.S. government agency securities with maturities between one and five years was zero and $47.2 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Gross unrealized gains and losses in a continuous loss position for cash equivalents and marketable securities were12 months or longer are not material as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016.2018. As of December 31, 2019, we considered any decreases in market value on our marketable securities to be temporary in nature and did 0t consider any of our investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired. All of our marketable securities have contractual maturities of less than one year.

8.We carry the Convertible Notes at face value less the unamortized discount and issuance costs on our consolidated balance sheets and present that fair value for disclosure purposes only. As of December 31, 2019, the fair value of the Convertible Notes was $1.3 billion. The estimated fair value of the Convertible Notes, which are classified as Level 2 financial instruments, was determined based on the estimated or actual bid prices of the Convertible Notes in an over-the-counter market on the last business day of the period.

11. Income Taxes

The domestic and foreign components of pre-tax loss were as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Domestic

 

$

(3,027,580

)

 

$

(520,482

)

 

$

(380,216

)

 

$

(770,448

)

 

$

(969,922

)

 

$

(3,027,580

)

Foreign

 

 

(435,828

)

 

 

(1,241

)

 

 

(266

)

 

 

(262,819

)

 

 

(283,442

)

 

 

(435,828

)

Loss before income taxes

 

$

(3,463,408

)

 

$

(521,723

)

 

$

(380,482

)

 

$

(1,033,267

)

 

$

(1,253,364

)

 

$

(3,463,408

)


The components of our income tax (benefit) expense were as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

State

 

 

(1,784

)

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

113

 

 

 

106

 

 

 

(1,784

)

Foreign

 

 

932

 

 

 

869

 

 

 

108

 

 

 

771

 

 

 

2,824

 

 

 

932

 

Total current income tax (benefit) expense

 

 

(852

)

 

 

872

 

 

 

111

 

 

 

884

 

 

 

2,930

 

 

 

(852

)

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 

(12,287

)

 

 

(6,364

)

 

 

(7,141

)

 

 

(277

)

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(12,287

)

State

 

 

303

 

 

 

(780

)

 

 

(559

)

 

 

(85

)

 

 

(40

)

 

 

303

 

Foreign

 

 

(5,506

)

 

 

(808

)

 

 

 

 

 

(129

)

 

 

(328

)

 

 

(5,506

)

Total deferred income tax (benefit) expense

 

 

(17,490

)

 

 

(7,952

)

 

 

(7,700

)

 

 

(491

)

 

 

(383

)

 

 

(17,490

)

Income tax (benefit) expense

 

$

(18,342

)

 

$

(7,080

)

 

$

(7,589

)

 

$

393

 

 

$

2,547

 

 

$

(18,342

)

 

The following is a reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to our effective tax rate:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Tax benefit (expense) computed at the federal statutory rate

 

 

34.0

%

 

 

34.0

%

 

 

34.0

%

 

 

21.0

%

 

 

21.0

%

 

 

34.0

%

State tax benefit (expense), net of federal benefit

 

 

3.0

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

2.3

 

 

 

7.6

 

 

 

5.1

 

 

 

3.0

 

Change in valuation allowance

 

 

(25.4

)

 

 

(34.6

)

 

 

(31.0

)

 

 

(38.5

)

 

 

(28.4

)

 

 

(25.4

)

U.S. corporate tax rate reduction

 

 

(11.4

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

(11.4

)

Differences between U.S. and foreign tax rates on foreign income

 

 

(2.4

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.0

)

 

 

(0.9

)

 

 

(2.4

)

Stock-based compensation benefit (expense)

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

(0.4

)

 

 

(4.2

)

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

(1.2

)

 

 

1.1

 

Federal research & development credit benefit

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

0.5

 

U.S. federal research & development credit benefit

 

 

6.3

 

 

 

5.2

 

 

 

1.4

 

Acquisitions and divestitures

 

 

3.4

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

 

Other benefits (expenses)

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

(1.4

)

 

 

0.2

 

Total income tax benefit (expense)

 

 

0.5

%

 

 

1.4

%

 

 

2.0

%

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

(0.2

)%

 

 

0.5

%

 

The significant components of net deferred tax balances were as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued expenses

 

$

10,534

 

 

$

10,864

 

 

$

31,746

 

 

$

21,056

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

2,142

 

 

 

1,900

 

Intangible assets

 

 

140,771

 

 

 

24,089

 

 

 

172,228

 

 

 

140,494

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

396,604

 

 

 

21,111

 

 

 

134,489

 

 

 

254,255

 

Net operating losses

 

 

473,110

 

 

 

33,276

 

Loss carryforwards

 

 

1,201,569

 

 

 

849,224

 

Tax credit carryforwards

 

 

124,078

 

 

 

15,854

 

 

 

337,497

 

 

 

235,300

 

Property and equipment

 

 

 

 

 

203

 

Lease liability

 

 

84,154

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

2,015

 

 

 

1,469

 

 

 

2,485

 

 

 

1,298

 

Total deferred tax assets

 

$

1,149,254

 

 

$

108,563

 

 

$

1,964,168

 

 

$

1,501,830

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment

 

$

(5,883

)

 

$

(167

)

 

$

(1,420

)

 

$

 

Convertible debt

 

 

(87,904

)

 

 

 

Right-of-use asset

 

 

(63,595

)

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

 

(5,883

)

 

 

(167

)

 

$

(152,919

)

 

$

 

Total net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance

 

 

1,143,371

 

 

 

108,396

 

 

 

1,811,249

 

 

 

1,501,830

 

Valuation allowance

 

 

(1,144,543

)

 

 

(108,872

)

 

 

(1,811,666

)

 

 

(1,502,346

)

Net deferred taxes

 

$

(1,172

)

 

$

(476

)

 

$

(417

)

 

$

(516

)


Income tax benefitexpense was $18.3 million and $7.1$0.4 million for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The effective income2019, compared to a tax rate was 0.5% and 1.4%expense of $2.5 million for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. 2018.

The income tax benefits for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were primarily due to discrete tax benefits of $15.5 million and $7.1 million, respectively, as a result of partial releases of valuation allowances against net deferred tax assets related to acquisitions. The net deferred tax liabilities originating from acquisitions during the periods were considered as an available source of income to realize a portion of our deferred tax assets.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“Tax Act”) was signed into law makingmade significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code. Changes include, but are not limited to,Code, including a corporate income tax rate decrease to 21% effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. This changeThe Tax Act also introduced the global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) provisions, which generally impose a tax on the net income of foreign corporate subsidiaries in excess of a deemed return on their tangible assets. We recognize the tax rate resultedon GILTI as an expense in the period the tax is incurred. We have not provided deferred taxes related to temporary differences that on their reversal will affect the amount of income subject to GILTI in the period the tax is incurred.

Upon the adoption of ASU 2016-12 on January 1, 2019, we recognized a reduction in our net U.S.$90.9 million deferred tax asset and a $69.0 million deferred tax liability for operating lease liabilities and operating lease right-of-use assets, respectively, with offsetting $14.4 million and $7.5 million reductions to the deferred tax assets before valuation allowance by $396.2 million, which was fully offset byfor accrued expenses and property and equipment, respectively. Taken together on a reduction innet basis, there is 0 change to our valuation allowance. The other provisions of the Tax Act, including the one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of cumulative foreign earnings, did not have a material impact on our financial statements as of December 31, 2017.

In December 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (SAB 118), which allows us to record provisional amounts during a measurement period not to extend beyond one year of the enactment date. The impact of the change in tax rate is based on estimates of ourtotal net U.S. deferred tax assets before valuation allowance as a result of December 31, 2017. Additionally, potential further guidance may be forthcoming fromthese changes.

The issuance of the Financial Accounting Standards BoardConvertible Notes in August 2019 resulted in a temporary difference between the carrying amount and tax basis of the SecuritiesConvertible Notes due to the allocation of debt proceeds and Exchange Commission, as well as regulations, interpretationsdebt issuance costs between the liability and rulings from federalequity components. This basis difference resulted in the recognition of a $92.1 million net deferred tax liability and state tax agencies,an offsetting change to our valuation allowance, both of which could result inwere recorded to additional impacts.paid-in-capital on our consolidated balance sheets.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had an immaterial amount of unremitted earnings related to certain foreign subsidiaries. We intend to continue to reinvest our foreign earnings indefinitely and do not expect to incur any significant taxes related to such amounts.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had accumulated federal and state net operating loss carry-forwards of $1.6 billion and $930.2 million, respectively. The U.S. federal and state net operating loss carry-forwardscarryforwards of $4.0 billion and $2.3 billion, respectively. Of the $4.0 billion of federal net operating loss carryforwards, $1.5 billion was generated before January 1, 2018 and is subject to a 20-year carryforward period. The remaining $2.5 billion can be carried forward indefinitely but is subject to an 80% taxable income limitation. The pre-Tax Act losses and state net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2031 and 2026, respectively. As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had $521.7 million$1.3 billion of U.K. net operating loss carry-forwardscarryforwards that can be carried overforward indefinitely. As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had accumulated U.S. federal and state research tax credits of $90.1$225.2 million and $39.9$135.8 million, respectively. The U.S. federal research tax credits will begin to expire in 2032. The U.S. state research tax credits do not expire.

Available net operating losses may be subject to annual limitations due to ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Code”), and similar state provisions. Under Section 382 of the Code, substantial changes in our ownership and the ownership of acquired companies may limit the amount of net operating loss carry-forwards that are available to offset taxable income. The annual limitation would not automatically result in the loss of net operating loss carry-forwards but may limit the amount available in any given future period. Additional limitations on the use of these tax attributes could occur in the event of possible disputes arising in examination from various taxing authorities.

We recognize valuation allowances on deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. We had valuation allowances against net deferred tax assets of $1.1$1.8 billion and $108.9 million$1.5 billion as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. In 2017,2019, the changeincrease in the valuation allowance was primarily attributable to athe net increase in our deferred tax assets resulting from the loss from operations.operations was partially offset by the release of valuation allowance in additional paid-in-capital related to the Convertible Note issuance.


Uncertain Tax Positions

The following table summarizes the activity related to our gross unrecognized tax benefits during the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016:2018:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Beginning balance of unrecognized tax benefits

 

$

243,862

 

 

$

 

 

$

251,808

 

 

$

203,177

 

Additions for current year tax positions

 

 

42,209

 

 

 

243,862

 

 

 

40,221

 

 

 

43,197

 

Additions for prior year tax positions

 

 

2,158

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,977

 

 

 

7,615

 

Reductions for prior year tax positions

 

 

(568

)

 

 

 

 

 

(7,425

)

 

 

(1,965

)

Changes due to foreign currency translation adjustments

 

 

163

 

 

 

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

(216

)

Remeasurement of uncertain tax positions due to the Tax Act

 

 

(84,647

)

 

 

 

Ending balance of unrecognized tax benefits (excluding interest and penalties)

 

$

203,177

 

 

$

243,862

 

 

$

286,605

 

 

$

251,808

 

Interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits

 

 

80

 

 

 

 

 

 

200

 

 

 

260

 

Ending balance of unrecognized tax benefits (including interest and penalties)

 

$

203,257

 

 

$

243,862

 

 

$

286,805

 

 

$

252,068

 

 

The total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits, including related interest and penalties, was $203.3$286.8 million and $243.9$252.1 million as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively.

Substantially all of the unrecognized tax benefit was recorded as a reduction in our gross deferred tax assets, offset by a corresponding reduction in our valuation allowance. We have net unrecognized tax benefits of $2.1$1.5 million and $3.6$2.7 million that is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. Assuming there continues to be a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets in future periods when gross unrecognized tax benefits are realized, this would result in a tax benefit of $2.8$2.7 million within our provision of income taxes at such time.

Our policy is to recognize interest and penalties associated with tax matters as part of the income tax provision and include accrued interest and penalties with the related income tax liability on our consolidated balance sheet. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, interest expense we recorded related to uncertain tax positions was not material. Any changes

In June 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit overturned the 2015 Tax Court decision in Altera Corp. v. Commissioner, upholding the portion of the Treasury regulations issued under Section 482 of the Code requiring related-party participants in a cost sharing arrangement to share stock-based compensation costs. In July 2019, the taxpayer filed a petition for an en banc rehearing before the Ninth Circuit, which was denied in November 2019. The taxpayer has 90 days from that date to petition the U.S. Supreme Court for review of the decision. Depending on the final resolution of this matter, there is a reasonable possibility that there will be a significant impact on our gross unrecognized tax benefits. As a result of the valuation allowance held against our deferred tax assets, we do not believe the final resolution will result in a material impact on our income tax expense, net deferred taxes, net unrecognized tax benefits, recorded as of December 31, 2017 that are reasonably possible to occur within the next 12 months are not expected to be material.or consolidated financials.

The income taxes we pay are subject to review by taxing jurisdictions globally. Our estimate of the potential outcome of any uncertain tax position is subject to management’s assessment of relevant risks, facts, and circumstances existing at that time. We believe that our estimate has adequately provided for these matters. However, our future results may include adjustments to estimates in the period the audits are resolved, which may impact our effective tax rate.

Tax years ending on or after December 31, 2012 are subject to examination by federal, state,in the U.S., and various foreign jurisdictions.tax years ending on or after December 31, 2017 are subject to examination in the U.K.


9.12. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The table below presents the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) by component and the reclassifications out of AOCI:

 

 

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive

Income (Loss) by Component

 

 

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component

 

 

Marketable

Securities

 

 

Foreign

Currency

Translation

 

 

Total

 

 

Marketable

Securities

 

 

Foreign Currency

Translation

 

 

Total

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

$

44

 

 

$

(2,101

)

 

$

(2,057

)

Balance at December 31, 2018

 

$

(368

)

 

$

3,515

 

 

$

3,147

 

OCI before reclassifications (1)

 

 

(1,137

)

 

 

17,336

 

 

 

16,199

 

 

 

873

 

 

 

(3,371

)

 

 

(2,498

)

Amounts reclassified from AOCI (2)(1)

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

(76

)

 

 

 

 

 

(76

)

Net current period OCI

 

 

(1,122

)

 

 

17,336

 

 

 

16,214

 

 

 

797

 

 

 

(3,371

)

 

 

(2,574

)

Balance at December 31, 2017

 

$

(1,078

)

 

$

15,235

 

 

$

14,157

 

Balance at December 31, 2019

 

$

429

 

 

$

144

 

 

$

573

 

 

(1)

The associated income tax effects for gains / losses on marketable securities were not material.

(2)

Realized gains and losses on marketable securities are reclassified from AOCI into other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations.

10. Geographic Information13. Property and Equipment, Net

Revenue by geography is based on the billing addressProperty and equipment, net, consisted of the advertiser. following:

 

As of December 31,

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Computer hardware and software

$

27,528

 

 

$

27,920

 

Buildings

 

 

 

 

54,050

 

Leasehold improvements

 

165,150

 

 

 

107,265

 

Furniture and equipment

 

85,366

 

 

 

75,570

 

Construction in progress

 

8,183

 

 

 

14,751

 

Total

 

286,227

 

 

 

279,556

 

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

(112,560

)

 

 

(66,996

)

Property and equipment, net

$

173,667

 

 

$

212,560

 

Depreciation and amortization expense on property and equipment was $53.8 million, $49.0 million, and $29.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.

The following tables list revenue andtable lists property and equipment, net by geographic area:

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

$

642,971

 

 

$

355,252

 

 

$

56,253

 

Rest of the world (1)

 

 

181,978

 

 

 

49,230

 

 

 

2,410

 

Total revenue

 

$

824,949

 

 

$

404,482

 

 

$

58,663

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Property and equipment, net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

$

153,771

 

 

$

190,412

 

Rest of world (1)

 

19,896

 

 

 

22,148

 

Total property and equipment, net

$

173,667

 

 

$

212,560

 

 

(1)

No individual country exceeded 10% of our total revenue for any period presented.

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Property and equipment, net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

$

146,862

 

 

$

98,254

 

Rest of the world (1)

 

 

19,900

 

 

 

2,331

 

Total property and equipment, net

 

$

166,762

 

 

$

100,585

 

(1)

NoNaN individual country exceeded 10% of our total property and equipment, net for any period presented.


11. Property and Equipment, Net

Property and equipment, net, consisted of the following:

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Computer hardware and software

 

$

28,685

 

 

$

22,606

 

Buildings

 

 

59,530

 

 

 

36,854

 

Leasehold improvements

 

 

52,252

 

 

 

13,166

 

Land

 

 

4,630

 

 

 

4,630

 

Furniture and equipment

 

 

49,587

 

 

 

20,349

 

Construction in progress

 

 

9,841

 

 

 

20,790

 

Total

 

 

204,525

 

 

 

118,395

 

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

(37,763

)

 

 

(17,810

)

Property and equipment, net

 

$

166,762

 

 

$

100,585

 

Depreciation and amortization expense on property and equipment was $29.8 million, $12.9 million, and $5.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 respectively.

12.14. Balance Sheet Components

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities at December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 consisted of the following:

 

 

As of December 31,

 

As of  December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

(in thousands)

 

(in thousands)

 

Accrued infrastructure costs

 

$

96,468

 

 

$

43,529

 

$

116,184

 

 

$

94,819

 

Securities class actions legal charges

 

100,000

 

 

 

 

Accrued compensation and related expenses

 

 

37,648

 

 

 

23,447

 

 

43,985

 

 

 

41,610

 

Partner revenue share liability

 

 

31,878

 

 

 

22,821

 

 

30,606

 

 

 

37,642

 

Acquisition purchase consideration liability

 

 

28,696

 

 

 

6,000

 

Accrued professional fees

 

 

15,783

 

 

 

11,157

 

Accrued tax liability

 

 

10,339

 

 

 

9,252

 

Deferred revenue

 

20,082

 

 

 

10,957

 

Other

 

 

54,250

 

 

 

32,119

 

 

99,753

 

 

 

76,787

 

Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 

$

275,062

 

 

$

148,325

 

$

410,610

 

 

$

261,815

 

 

Other liabilities at December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 consisted of the following:

 

 

As of December 31,

 

As of  December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

(in thousands)

 

(in thousands)

 

Sublease liability

$

 

 

$

32,057

 

Deferred rent

 

 

 

 

28,370

 

Lease incentive liability

 

$

28,114

 

 

$

1,541

 

 

 

 

 

25,880

 

Deferred rent

 

 

22,763

 

 

 

8,525

 

Build-to-suit financing obligations

 

 

16,033

 

 

 

15,140

 

Acquisition purchase consideration liability

 

 

10,300

 

 

 

15,944

 

Other

 

 

5,773

 

 

 

5,984

 

 

57,382

 

 

 

24,109

 

Total other liabilities

 

$

82,983

 

 

$

47,134

 

$

57,382

 

 

$

110,416

 

 


13. Long-Term Debt

In July 2016, we entered into a five-year senior unsecured revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”) with lenders, some of which are affiliated with certain members of the underwriting syndicate for our IPO, that allows us to borrow up to $1.1 billion to fund working capital and general corporate-purpose expenditures. The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 0.75%, as well as an annual commitment fee of 0.10% on the daily undrawn balance of the facility. No origination fees were incurred at the closing of the Credit Facility. Any amounts outstanding under this facility will be due and payable in July 2021. In December 2016, the amount we are permitted to borrow under the Credit Facility was increased to $1.2 billion. As of December 31, 2017, no amounts were outstanding under the Credit Facility. In February 2018, the amount we are permitted to borrow under the Credit Facility was increased to $1.25 billion.

14.15. Non-Marketable Investments

We held investments in privately held companies with a carrying value of $22.7$55.0 million and $11.8$43.6 million as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. Our share of gains and losses in equity method investments was a net gain of $1.0 million and net losses of $3.9 million and $0.5 millionnot material for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, which is included in other income (expense), net in our consolidated statements of operations. Non-marketable investments are included within other assets on the consolidated balance sheet. Such investments are reviewed periodically for impairments. NoImpairment recorded for the year ended December 31, 2019 was not material. We recorded impairments of $7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 million within other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations. NaN impairments were recorded in any period presented.the year ended December 31, 2017. Additionally, we recognized gains on non-marketable investments of $20.8 million within other income (expense), net on the consolidated statement of operations.

15.16. Employee Benefit Plans

We have a defined contribution 401(k) plan (the “401(k) Plan”) for our U.S.-based employees. The 401(k) Plan is available for all full-time employees who meet certain eligibility requirements. Eligible employees may contribute up to 100% of their annual compensation, but are limited to the maximum annual dollar amount allowable under the Internal Revenue Code. Beginning in 2016, weWe match 100% of each participant’s contribution up to a maximum of 3% of the participant’s base salary, bonus, and commissions paid during the period, and we match 50% of each participant’s contribution between 3% and 5% of the participant’s base salary, bonus, and commissions paid during the period. During the years ended December 31, 2017,2019, 2018, and 2016,2017, we recognized expense of $12.4$15.4 million, $16.1 million, and $4.2$12.4 million, respectively, related to matching contributions. For

17. Subsequent Events

On January 17, 2020, we reached a preliminary agreement to settle the year endedsecurities class actions that arose following our IPO. The preliminary settlement agreement was signed in January 2020 and provided for a resolution of all of the pending claims in the securities class actions for $187.5 million. The agreement is subject to approval by the federal and state courts before which the securities class actions are pending. The terms of the settlement include a full release of all claims against all defendants including Snap, its officers and directors, and the underwriters for our IPO. We evaluated this subsequent event, concluding it provided additional evidence about a condition that existed as of December 31, 2015,2019. In the fourth quarter of 2019, we did not make any matching contributions.recorded legal expense, net of amounts directly covered by insurance, of $100.0 million for the expected


settlement of the securities class actions. The amount was recorded in general and administrative expense in our consolidated statements of operations.


Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with AccountantsAccountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of December 31, 2017,2019, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in this Annual Report on Form 10-K was (a) reported within the time periods specified by SEC rules and regulations, and (b) communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding any required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in management’s evaluation pursuant to Rules 13a-15(d) or 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act during the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures

In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal ControlsControl Over Financial Reporting

This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include a report of management's assessment regardingOur management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting or(as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Management conducted an attestation reportassessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework). Based on the assessment, management has concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019 to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our independent registered public accounting firm, dueErnst & Young LLP, has issued an audit report with respect to a transition period established by rulesour internal control over financial reporting, which appears in Part II, Item 8 of the Securities and Exchange Commission for newly public companiesthis Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 9B. Other Information.

Increase to Revolving Credit Facility2020 Discretionary Bonus Program

On February 20, 2018, we entered into a joinder agreement, or4, 2020, the Joinder,compensation committee of the board of directors approved the 2020 Bonus Program. The 2020 Bonus Program provides executive officers and other eligible employees the opportunity to our Revolving Credit Agreement, dated July 29, 2016 byearn bonuses based on the level of achievement of certain corporate objectives and among us, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as administrative agent, the lenderskey results from time to time party thereto, and the issuing banks from time to time party thereto, or the Credit Agreement.January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020.

The Joinder adds Silicon Valley Bank as a lendercompensation committee will set the corporate objectives and key results based on the recommendations of the chief executive officer, and determine the degree to provide a $50.0 million commitment throughwhich they have been met after considering the accordion featurerecommendations of management. Each eligible participant in the Credit Agreement, increasing the total commitment2020 Bonus Program may receive a bonus in an amount up to 100% of such participant’s annual base salary earned in 2020. The compensation committee may pay all or any portion of an earned bonus in shares of Class A common stock granted under the Credit AgreementSnap Inc. 2017 Equity Incentive Plan. The compensation committee also has the right to $1.25 billion. adjust the bonus target of any participant upward in the event of over-achievement of the corporate objectives and key results.

There wereis no other amendmentsset formula for determining the bonus amount under the 2020 Bonus Program based on the achievement of the corporate objectives and key results. Rather, the compensation committee will exercise its discretion in determining the


bonus amount actually earned by each participant. Awards under the 2020 Bonus Program are expected to occur in the first quarter of 2021. A participant must remain an employee on the payment date under the 2020 Bonus Program to be eligible to earn a bonus.

The description of the 2020 Bonus Program does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the terms2020 Bonus Program, a copy of the Credit Agreement.which is attached as Exhibit 10.22 and is incorporated by reference herein.

We are including this disclosure in this Annual Report on Form 10-K rather than filing a Current Report on Form 8-K under Items 1.01 and 2.03Item 5.02 at a later date. The foregoing description is only a summary of the provisions of the Joinder and the Credit Agreement and is qualified in its entirety by the underlying agreements. The full text of the Joinder is filed as Exhibit 10.29 and incorporated by reference herein.


PART III

Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceGovernance.

The following table sets forth information for our directors and executive officers, and their ages as of December 31, 2017.2019.

 

Name

 

Age

 

Position

Executive Officers

 

 

 

 

Evan Spiegel

 

2729

 

Co-Founder, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Robert Murphy

 

2931

 

Co-Founder, Chief Technology Officer, and Director

Imran KhanDerek Andersen

 

4041

Chief Financial Officer

Jeremi Gorman

42

Chief Business Officer

Jared Grusd

44

 

Chief Strategy Officer

Andrew VolleroJerry Hunter

 

5155

Senior Vice President, Engineering

Rebecca Morrow

46

 

Chief FinancialAccounting Officer and Controller

Michael O’Sullivan

 

5254

 

General Counsel

Lara Sweet

43

Chief Accounting Officer

Steven Horowitz

50

Vice President of Technology

Non-Employee Directors

 

 

 

 

Michael Lynton(1)(2)(3)

 

5860

 

Director and Chairman of the Board

Joanna Coles(2)(3)

 

5557

 

Director

A.GA.G. Lafley(1)(2)(3)

 

70

Director

Mitchell Lasky

5572

 

Director

Stanley Meresman(3)(1)

 

7173

 

Director

Scott D. Miller(1)(3)(2)

 

6567

Director

Poppy Thorpe(1)(2)

35

 

Director

Christopher Young(3)

 

4547

 

Director

 

(1)

Member of the audit committee.

(2)

Member of the compensation committee.

(2)(3)

Member of the nominating and corporate governance committee.

(3)

Member of the audit committee.

Executive Officers

Evan Spiegel. Mr. Spiegel is our co-founder and has served as our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our board of directors since May 2012. Mr. Spiegel holds a B.S. in Engineering – Product Design from Stanford University. We believe that Mr. Spiegel is qualified to serve as a member of our board based on the perspective and experience he brings as our co-founder and Chief Executive Officer.

Robert Murphy. Mr. Murphy is our co-founder and has served as our Chief Technology Officer and a member of our board of directors since May 2012. Mr. Murphy holds a B.S. in Mathematical and Computational Science from Stanford University. We believe that Mr. Murphy is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors based on the perspective and experience he brings as our co-founder and Chief Technology Officer.

Imran Khan. Derek Andersen. Mr. KhanAndersen has served as Chief Financial Officer since May 2019 and previously served as our Vice President of Finance since July 2018. Mr. Andersen was previously employed at Amazon.com, Inc. from March 2011 to June 2018, serving in a variety of roles, most recently as Vice President of Finance supporting Amazon’s digital video business. Mr. Andersen also previously served in roles at Fox Interactive Media, including as Senior Vice President, Finance and Business Operations for IGN, and as Vice President, Finance. Mr. Andersen holds a B.B.A from Acadia University, an M.B.A from the Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley, and is a CFA Charter Holder.

Jeremi Gorman. Ms. Gorman has served as our Chief Business Officer since November 2018. Ms. Gorman was employed at Amazon.com Inc., serving as Head of Global Field Advertising Sales from June 2018 to November 2018, as Head of Field Advertising Sales, U.S. from April 2015 to June 2018, and as Head of Entertainment Advertising Sales from 2012 to April 2015. Ms. Gorman holds a B.A. from the University of California, Los Angeles.


Jared Grusd. Mr. Grusd has served as our Chief Strategy Officer since JanuaryNovember 2018. Mr. Grusd was employed by Oath Inc. as Chief Executive Officer, HuffPost and Global Head of News and Information at Oath Inc. from June 2017 to October 2018. Prior to that, Mr. Grusd served as Chief Executive Officer of HuffPost (formerly Huffington Post) since September 2015. From MayOctober 2011 to JanuarySeptember 2015, Mr. KhanGrusd was employed by Spotify Technology S.A. as General Counsel and Global Head of Corporate Development. Mr. Grusd holds an M.B.A. from Columbia Business School, a J.D. from University of Chicago Law School, and a B.A. from University of Pennsylvania.

Jerry Hunter. Mr. Hunter has served as a Managing Director in the Investment Banking Divisionour Senior Vice President, Engineering since November 2017 and previously served as Vice President of Core Engineering since October 2016. From August 2010 to October 2016, Mr. Hunter served as Vice President of Infrastructure at Credit Suisse. From March 2004Amazon, and previously as Vice President of Corporate Applications at Amazon from October 2007 to May 2011,August 2010. Mr. Khan was an Equity Analyst at J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. Mr. KhanHunter holds a B.S.B.A.B.S. and M.S. in Finance and EconomicsSystems Engineering from the University of Denver.Arizona.

Andrew Vollero. Mr. VolleroRebecca Morrow. Ms. Morrow has served as our Chief FinancialAccounting Officer and Controller since February 2016September 2019. From January 2018 to August 2019, Ms. Morrow served as Chief Accounting Officer at GoDaddy Inc., and previously served as our Vice President of Finance sinceand Head of Technical Accounting and Reporting from March 2015 to January 2018. Prior to that, Ms. Morrow served in various roles at Deloitte & Touche LLP, most recently serving as Managing Director in the Advisory Services practice from August 2015. From September 20002013 to March 2015, and as Senior Manager in the Advisory Services practice from October 2008 to August 2015, Mr. Vollero was employed at Mattel, Inc., a toy manufacturing company, where he served as the Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy, Development & Investor Relations from September 2005 to August 2015 and Division CFO, Senior Vice President, Finance and Strategy from September 2000 to September 2005. Mr. Vollero2013. Ms. Morrow holds a B.A.B.S. degree in MathematicsBusiness and EconomicsAccounting from Yalethe University of Idaho and a MasterMasters of Science in ManagementAccountancy degree from Oxford University.the David Eccles School of Business of the University of Utah.

Michael O’Sullivan. Mr. O’Sullivan has served as our General Counsel since July 2017. From 1992 to July 2017, Mr. O’Sullivan was a lawyer in private practice. He served since 1996 as a lawyer at the law firm of Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP in Los Angeles, California, where he focused his practice on advising companies, their boards of directors, and founders on corporate transactions, governance matters, and significant disputes. Mr. O’Sullivan holds a J.D. from University of Southern California’s Gould School of Law and a B.A. from University of Pennsylvania.


Lara Sweet. Ms. Sweet has served as our Chief Accounting Officer since October 2017 and previously served as our Controller since June 2016. From November 2014 to June 2016, Ms. Sweet served as Controller and Chief Accounting Officer at AOL, Inc., and previously served there as Vice President, Internal Audit from April 2014 to November 2014, and Vice President, Assistant Controller from August 2011 to April 2014. Ms. Sweet holds a B.S. in Accounting from George Mason University.

Steven Horowitz. Mr. Horowitz has served as our Vice President of Technology since August 2017, and previously served as our Vice President of Hardware from January to August 2017 and our Vice President of Engineering from January 2015 to December 2016. Prior to joining Snap Inc., Mr. Horowitz served as Senior Vice President of Software Engineering at Motorola Mobility, LLC, formerly a Google company, from December 2012 through January 2015. From January 2009 through November 2012, Mr. Horowitz served as Chief Technology Officer for Quotient Technology, Inc., a consumer technologies company. Prior to that he worked at Google, Microsoft, and Apple. Mr. Horowitz holds a B.A. from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Mr. Horowitz is also a member of the board of directors of Quotient Technology, Inc.

Non-Employee Directors

Michael Lynton. Mr. Lynton has served on our board of directors since April 2013 and has been Chairman of our board of directors since September 2016. Mr. Lynton served as Chief Executive Officer or Co-Chief Executive Officer of Sony Entertainment Inc., an international entertainment company, from April 2012 until August 2017, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc. from January 2004 until May 2017, and as CEO of Sony Corporation of America from March 2012 to August 2017. Mr. Lynton has also served as a member of the board of directors of Ares Management, L.P. since 2014, Pearson since February 2018, and Warner Music Group Corp. since February 2019. Mr. Lynton also served as a member of the board of directors of Pandora Media, Inc. sincefrom August 2017 and of Pearson sinceuntil February 2018.2019. Mr. Lynton holds a B.A. in History and Literature from Harvard College and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. We believe that Mr. Lynton is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors and Chairman due to his extensive leadership experience.

Joanna Coles. Ms. Coles has served on our board of directors since December 2015. Ms. Coles was appointed Chief Content Officer of Hearst Magazines in September 2016, overseeing editorial for Hearst’s 300 titles globally.globally, and served until August 2018. Prior to that she was Editor-in-Chief of Cosmopolitan, a role she started in September 2012. She edited Marie Claire magazine from April 2006 to September 2012. Ms. Coles worked for The Times of London from September 1998 to September 2001 and served as New York Bureau Chief for The Guardian from 1997 to 1998. She is on the board of Women Entrepreneurs New York City, an initiative to encourage female entrepreneurship, with a focus on underserved communities. Ms. Coles holds a B.A. in English and American literature from the University of East Anglia. We believe that Ms. Coles is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors due to her extensive experience working with content providers and advertisers.

A.G. Lafley. Mr. Lafley has served on our board of directors since July 2016. Mr. Lafley has held various positions within The Procter & Gamble Company since 1977 and served as its President, Chief Executive Officer, and as a member of the board of directors from June 2000 until June 2009 and again from May 2013 to October 2015. He also served as Chairman of the Board from July 2002 through February 2010 and again from May 2013 through June 2016. From April 2010 to May 2013, Mr. Lafley served as a consultant and as a Senior Adviser at Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC, a private equity firm. Mr. Lafley holds a B.A. from Hamilton College and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. We believe that Mr. Lafley is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors due to his extensive leadership experience.


Mitchell Lasky. Mr. Lasky has served on our board of directors since December 2012. Mr. Lasky has been a partner at Benchmark, a venture capital firm, since April 2007. From November 2000 to February 2006, Mr. Lasky served as Chief Executive Officer of JAMDAT Mobile, Inc., a publicly traded mobile games company, and served as Executive Vice President, Mobile & Online at Electronic Arts, a video game company, after it acquired JAMDAT in February 2006, until April 2007. Mr. Lasky holds a B.A. in History and Literature from Harvard College and a J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law. We believe Mr. Lasky is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors due to his extensive experience with social media and technology companies, as well as his experience as a venture capitalist investing in technology companies.

Stanley Meresman. Mr. Meresman has served on our board of directors since July 2015. During the last ten years, Mr. Meresman has served on the boards of directors of various public and private companies, including service as chair of the audit committee for some of these companies. He currently serves on the board of directors and as chair of the audit committee of Palo Alto Networks,Cloudflare, Inc., Guardant Health, Inc., and Medallia, Inc. He served as a member of the board of directors and as chair of the audit committees of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. from September 2014 to December 2018, LinkedIn Corporation from October 2010 to December 2016, and Zynga Inc. from June 2011 to June 2015,2015; and on the board of directors of Meru Networks, Inc. from September 2010 to May 2013, and Riverbed Technology, Inc. from March 2005 to May 2012. He also serves on the board of directors of several private companies and board of trustees of the Panetta Institute of Public Policy, a non-profit organization. From January 2004 to December 2004,


Mr. Meresman was a Venture Partner with Technology Crossover Ventures, a private equity firm, and was General Partner and Chief Operating Officer of Technology Crossover Ventures from November 2001 to December 2003. During the four years before joining Technology Crossover Ventures, Mr. Meresman was a private investor and board member and advisor to several technology companies. From 1989 to 1997, Mr. Meresman served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Silicon Graphics, Inc. Mr. Meresman holds a B.S. in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research from the University of California, Berkeley and an M.B.A. from the Stanford Graduate School of Business. We believe that Mr. Meresman is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors and chair of our audit committee due to his background as a member of the board and chair of the audit committee of other public companies and his financial and accounting expertise from his prior extensive experience as chief financial officer of two publicly traded companies.

Scott D. Miller. Mr. Miller has served on our board of directors since October 2016. Mr. Miller is a founder and Chief Executive Officer of G100 Companies, which operates G100 Network and SSA & Company. Before joining G100 Companies in March 2004, Mr. Miller was employed at Hyatt Hotels Corporation, a global hospitality company, where he served as non-executive vice chairman from August 2003 to December 2004, president from January 1999 to August 2003, and executive vice president from September 1997 to July 2003. Mr. Miller currently serves on the board of directors of QTS Realty Trust, Inc. and served on the boards of Affinion Group, Inc. from 2011 to 2013, AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company from 2002 to 2012, Orbitz Worldwide, Inc. from 2003 to 2004, and NAVTEQ corporation from 2002 to 2006. He also serves on several private company boards. Mr. Miller holds a B.S. in Human Biology from Stanford University and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago. We believe that Mr. Miller is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors due to his extensive leadership experience.

Poppy Thorpe. Ms. Thorpe has served on our board of directors since August 2018. Ms. Thorpe has served as Head of Brand Marketing at Glossier Inc., a beauty brand, since April 2018. Prior to that, Ms. Thorpe was Head of Strategy at FNDR, a marketing and advertising agency, from August 2017 to April 2018. Prior to FNDR, from August 2014 until August 2017, Ms. Thorpe was Strategy Director at R/GA, a digital agency. Prior to R/GA, Ms. Thorpe was a freelance strategy director. Ms. Thorpe holds a B.A. in English and Film Studies from University of San Francisco. We believe that Ms. Thorpe is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors due to her experience working with digital and technology companies and with advertisers.

Christopher Young. Mr. Young has served on our board of directors since October 2016. Since April 2017, Mr. Young hasserved as Chief Executive OfficerCEO of McAfee, LLC. From October 2014 until April 2017, Mr. Young servedHe joined Intel Corporation as Senior Vice President and General Manager, Intel Security Group at Intel Corporation, a multinational technology company, untilin October 2014, and later led the initiative to spin out McAfee, division was spun out.one of the largest, pure-play cybersecurity brands in the world. From November 2011 to September 2014, Mr. Young served as Senior Vice President, Security &and Government Group at Cisco Systems, Inc., a technology networking company. From August 2010 to October 2011, Mr. Young servedserves as Senior Vice President & General Manager, End User Computinga member of the President’s National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee and on the board of the non-profit Cyber Threat Alliance. Earlier in his career, he led cybersecurity efforts at RSA (a division of Dell EMC) and AOL. He also led end user computing at VMware Inc., a software company. From January 2011 to August 2016,and cofounded Cyveillance. Mr. Young has served on the board of directors of American Express since March 2018. From January 2011 to August 2016, he was a board member of Rapid7, Inc., a security software company. and has also served on the Board of Trustees of Princeton University. Mr. Young holds a B.A. in Public Policyan A.B. degree cum laude from Princeton University and an M.B.A. degree with distinction from the Harvard Business School. We believe that Mr. Young is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors due to his extensive experience with technology companies.

There are no family relationships among any of the directors or executive officers.

Independent Chairman

Our board of directors appointed Mr. Lynton to serve as our independent Chairman of our board of directors in September 2016. As Chairman of our board of directors, Mr. Lynton presides over meetings of our independent directors without management present. Mr. Lynton also performs such additional duties as our board of directors may otherwise determine and delegate. Mr. Lynton is an independent director and satisfies the independence requirements under NYSE listing standards.standards.


Composition of Our Board of Directors

Certain members of our board of directors were elected under the provisions of a voting agreement. Under the terms of this voting agreement, the stockholders who were party to the voting agreement agreed to vote their respective shares to elect: (1) one director designated by Benchmark Capital Partners (Mr. Lasky); (2) two directors designated by the holders of the Series FP preferred stock (Mr. Spiegel and Mr. Murphy); and (3) one individual designated by the other members of the board of directors (Mr. Lynton). The voting agreement terminated on the closing of our initial public offering in March 2017. Following our initial public offering, no stockholder has any special rights regarding the election or designation of members of our board of directors. There is no contractual arrangement by which Ms. Coles, Mr. Lafley, Mr. Meresman, Mr. Miller, and Mr. Young were appointed to our board of directors. Our current directors will continue to serve as directors until our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successor is duly elected, or until their earlier resignation or removal.

Our board of directors may establish the authorized number of directors from time to time by resolution. Our board of directors consists of nine members.


No stockholder has any special rights regarding the election or designation of members of our board of directors. There is no contractual arrangement by which any of our directors are appointed to our board of directors. Our current directors will continue to serve as directors until our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successor is duly elected, or if sooner, until their earlier death, resignation, or removal.

So long as any shares of our Class C common stock are outstanding, we will not have a classified board of directors, and all directors will be elected for annual terms.

Following the conversion of all of our Class C common stock to Class B common stock, and subsequent conversion of all of our Class B common stock to Class A common stock, we will have a classified board of directors consisting of three classes. Each class will be approximately equal in size, with each director serving staggered three-year terms. Directors will be assigned to a class by the then-current board of directors.

When our board of directors is classified, we expect that any additional directorships resulting from an increase in the number of directors will be distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist of one-third of the directors. The division of our board of directors into three classes with staggered three-year terms may delay or prevent a change of our management or a change in control.

Our board of directors held five meetings during 2017.2019. No member of our board of directors attended fewer than 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of the board of directors (held during the period for which he or she was a director) and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of the board of directors on which such director served (held during the period that such director served). Members of our board of directors are invited and encouraged to attend our annual meeting of stockholders. In 2019, seven members of our board of directors attended our annual meeting of stockholders.

Executive Sessions of Independent Directors

In order to promote open discussion among non-management directors, and as required under applicable NYSE rules, our board of directors conducts executive sessions of non-management directors during each regularly scheduled board meeting and at such other times if requested by a non-management director. In 2019, the non-management directors met in executive session at least once. The non-management directors provide feedback to executive management, as needed, promptly after the executive session. Neither Mr. Spiegel nor Mr. Murphy participates in such sessions. In addition, we hold executive sessions including only independent directors at least once a year. As Chairman of our board of directors, Mr. Lynton presides over meetings of our independent directors without management present.

Committees of Our Board of Directors

Our board of directors has established an audit committee, a compensation committee, and a nominating and corporate governance committee. The composition and responsibilities of each of the committees of our board of directors are described below. Members serve on these committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by our board of directors. Our board of directors may establish other committees as it deems necessary or appropriate from time to time.

Audit Committee

Our audit committee consists of Mr. Lynton, Mr. Meresman, and Mr. Miller, and Ms. Thorpe each of whom our board of directors has determined satisfies the independence requirements under NYSE listing standards and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Exchange Act. Mr. Young was a member of the audit committee until January 2018, and Mr. Lynton joined the audit committee in January 2018. The chair of our audit committee is Mr. Meresman, who our board of directors has determined is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of SEC regulations. Each member of our audit committee can read and understand fundamental financial statements in accordance with applicable requirements. In arriving at these determinations, the board of directors has examined each audit committee member’s scope of experience and the nature of their employment in the corporate finance sector. During 2017, the audit committee met six times. No member of the audit committee, other than Mr. Meresman, simultaneously serves on the audit committees of more than three public companies. Mr. Meresman currently serves on the audit committees of three other public companies, in addition to our company. Our board of directors has determined that such simultaneous service would not impair the ability of Mr. Meresman to effectively serve on our audit committee. During 2019, the audit committee met six times. Our board of directors has adopted a written charter for the audit committee, which is available on our website at www.snap.com.www.snap.com.


The primary purpose of the audit committee is to discharge the responsibilities of our board of directors with respect to our corporate accounting and financial reporting processes, systems of internal control, and financial-statement audits, and to oversee our independent registered accounting firm.

Specific responsibilities of our audit committee include:

helping our board of directors oversee our corporate accounting and financial reporting processes;

managing the selection, engagement, qualifications, independence, and performance of a qualified firm to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements;


helping our board of directors oversee our corporate accounting and financial reporting processes;

 

managing the selection, engagement, qualifications, independence, and performance of a qualified firm to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements;

discussing the scope and results of the audit with the independent registered public accounting firm, and reviewing, with management and the independent accountants, our interim and year-end operating results;

developing procedures for employees to submit concerns anonymously about questionable accounting or audit matters;

developing procedures for employees to submit concerns anonymously about questionable accounting or audit matters;

reviewing related person transactions;

reviewing related person transactions;

obtaining and reviewing a report by the independent registered public accounting firm at least annually, that describes our internal quality control procedures, any material issues with such procedures, and any steps taken to deal with such issues when required by applicable law; and

reviewing cybersecurity and data privacy risks;

obtaining and reviewing a report by the independent registered public accounting firm at least annually, that describes our internal quality control procedures, any material issues with such procedures, and any steps taken to deal with such issues when required by applicable law; and

approving, or, as permitted, pre-approving, audit and permissible non-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm.

approving, or, as permitted, pre-approving, audit and permissible non-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm.

Compensation Committee

Our compensation committee consists of Mr. Lafley, Mr. Lynton, Mr. Miller, and Mr. Miller.Ms. Thorpe. Our board of directors has determined that each of Mr. Lafley, Mr. Lynton, and Mr. Miller, are eachand Ms. Thorpe is independent under NYSE listing standards and a “non-employee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, and an “outside director” as that term is defined in Section 162(m) of the Code.Act. The chair of our compensation committee is Mr. Lynton. During 2017,2019, the compensation committee met six times. Our board of directors has adopted a written charter for the compensation committee, which is available on our website at www.snap.com.

The primary purpose of our compensation committee is to discharge the responsibilities of our board of directors in overseeing our compensation policies, plans, and programs and to review and determine the compensation to be paid to our executive officers, directors, and other senior management, as appropriate.

Specific responsibilities of our compensation committee include:

reviewing and approving the compensation of our chief executive officer, other executive officers, and senior management;

reviewing and recommending to our board of directors the compensation paid to our directors;

reviewing and approving the compensation arrangements with our executive officers and other senior management;

administering our equity incentive plans and other benefit programs;

reviewing, adopting, amending, and terminating incentive compensation and equity plans, severance agreements, profit sharing plans, bonus plans, change-of-control protections, and any other compensatory arrangements for our executive officers and other senior management;

reviewing, evaluating, and recommending to our board of directors succession plans for our executive officers; and

reviewing and establishing general policies relating to compensation and benefits of our employees, including our overall compensation philosophy.

See the sections titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Director Compensation” for a description of our chiefprocesses and procedures for the consideration and determination of executive officer other executive officers, and senior management;director compensation.

reviewing and recommending to our board of directors the compensation paid to our directors;

reviewing and approving the compensation arrangements with our executive officers and other senior management;

administering our equity incentive plans and other benefit programs;

reviewing, adopting, amending, and terminating incentive compensation and equity plans, severance agreements, profit sharing plans, bonus plans, change-of-control protections, and any other compensatory arrangements for our executive officers and other senior management;

reviewing, evaluating, and recommending to our board of directors succession plans for our executive officers; and

reviewing and establishing general policies relating to compensation and benefits of our employees, including our overall compensation philosophy.


Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our nominating and corporate governance committee consists of Ms. Coles, Mr. Lafley, and Mr. Lynton. The chair of our nominating and corporate governance committee is Mr. Lafley. Our board of directors has determined that each member of the nominating and corporate governance committee is independent under the NYSE listing standards, a non-employee director, and free from any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of his or her independent judgment. During 2017,2019, the nominating and corporate governance committee met fourfive times. Our board of directors has adopted a written charter for the nominating and corporate governance committee, which is available on our website at www.snap.com.


Specific responsibilities of our nominating and corporate governance committee include:

identifying and evaluating candidates, including the nomination of incumbent directors for reelection and nominees recommended by stockholders, to serve on our board of directors;

identifying and evaluating candidates, including the nomination of incumbent directors for reelection and nominees recommended by stockholders, to serve on our board of directors;

considering and making recommendations to our board of directors regarding the composition and chairmanship of the committees of our board of directors;

considering and making recommendations to our board of directors regarding the composition and chairmanship of the committees of our board of directors;

instituting plans or programs for the continuing education of our board of directors and orientation of new directors;

instituting plans or programs for the continuing education of our board of directors and orientation of new directors;

developing and making recommendations to our board of directors regarding corporate governance guidelines and matters; and

developing and making recommendations to our board of directors regarding corporate governance guidelines and matters; and

overseeing periodic evaluations of the board of directors’ performance, including committees of the board of directors and management.

overseeing periodic evaluations of the board of directors’ performance, including committees of the board of directors and management.

Code of Conduct

We have adopted a Code of Conduct that applies to all our employees, officers, and directors. This includes our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. The full text of our Code of Conduct is available on our website at www.snap.com. We intend to disclose on our website any future amendments of our Code of Conduct or waivers that exempt any principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, persons performing similar functions, or our directors from provisions in the Code of Conduct. You can request a copy of our Code of Conduct by writing to our Secretary at Snap Inc., 63 Market Street, Venice, 2772 Donald Douglas Loop North, Santa Monica, CA 9029190405.

Our board of directors believes that good corporate governance is important to ensure that the company is managed for the long-term benefit of our stockholders. The full text of our corporate governance guidelines is also available on our website at www.snap.com.

Procedures by Which Stockholders May Nominate Directors

The nominating and corporate governance committee and our board of directors will review and evaluate candidates proposed by stockholders. The nominating and corporate governance committee and our board of directors will apply the same criteria, and follow substantially the same process in considering the candidates, as they do in considering other candidates. The factors generally considered by the nominating and corporate governance committee and our board of directors are set out in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available on our website at www.snap.com. If a stockholder who is eligible to vote at the 20182020 annual meeting of stockholders wishes to nominate a candidate to be considered for election as a director, it must comply with the procedures set forth in our by-laws and give timely notice of the nomination in writing to our Secretary. All stockholder proposals should be marked for the attention of our Secretary at Snap Inc., 63 Market Street, Venice,2772 Donald Douglas Loop North, Santa Monica, CA 9029190405.

Stockholder Communications with the Board of Directors

Any stockholder, including a holder of Class A common stock, or any interested party may contact our board of directors regarding genuine issues or questions about us by sending a letter to the board of directors at: Snap Inc., c/o Secretary, 63 Market Street, Venice, 2772 Donald Douglas Loop North, Santa Monica, CA 9029190405, Attention: Board of Directors. Each communication should specify the person sending the communication, the general topic of the communication, and the class and number of shares of our stock that are owned of record (if a record holder) or beneficially (if not a record holder). If any stockholder, including a holder of Class A common stock, wants to contact the independent members of the board of directors, the stockholder should address the communication to the attention of the Chairman (c/o Secretary) of the board of directors at the address above. Our legal department will review communications before forwarding them to the recipient, and will not forward a communication that is unrelated to the duties and responsibilities of the board of directors, irrelevant, primarily commercial in nature, addressed already on our website or in other filings, or is unduly hostile, threatening, illegal, or similarly unsuitable. Any communication that is not forwarded will be made available to any director on request.


Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance Reports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC and to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Because our Class A common stock is non-voting, significant holders of our common stock are exempt from the obligation to file reports under Section 16 of the Exchange Act. For more information, see “Risk Factors—Because our Class A common stock is non-voting, we and our stockholders are exempt from certain provisions of U.S. securities laws. This may limit the information available to holders of our Class A common stock.”

To our knowledge, based solely on our review of the copies of such reports furnished to us or written representations from such persons, we believe that, with respect to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,2019, such persons complied with all such filing requirements, except that a statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities was filed late on August 10, 2017 on behalf of Michael Lynton, reporting two prior conversions of our Class B common stock into Class A common stock.requirements.

Item 11.Executive Compensation.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The compensation provided to our named executive officers is detailed in the Summary Compensation Table, other tables and the accompanying footnotes, and narrative following this section. This compensation discussion and analysis summarizes the material aspects of our compensation programs that we provide to our named executive officers. Our named executive officers for 2019 were:

Evan Spiegel, Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer;

Derek Andersen, Chief Financial Officer;

Jerry Hunter, Senior Vice President, Engineering;

Rebecca Morrow, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller;

Michael O’Sullivan, General Counsel;

Tim Stone, former Chief Financial Officer; and

Lara Sweet, former interim Chief Financial Officer.

Our board of directors has delegated to the compensation committee the authority and responsibility for reviewing, evaluating, and determining the compensation to be paid to executive officers, overseeing our compensation policies, and administering the compensation plans and programs for Snap.

General Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Philosophy

We believe that reinventing the camera represents our greatest opportunity to improve the way that people live and communicate. We contribute to human progress by empowering people to express themselves, live in the moment, learn about the world, and have fun together. We seek kind, smart, and creative individuals to accomplish this goal. Our compensation philosophy supports this goal by attracting the best people to join Snap and incentivizing them to innovate, create, and drive long-term results.

Today, we compensate our executive officers mostly with equity that vests over multiple years. Our focus on equity compensation encourages executives to operate like owners, linking their interests with the interests of our stockholders. We have an annual discretionary performance-based bonus that can be paid in cash or equity; however, no amounts were awarded in 2019. As our company grows, we will continue to evaluate our compensation philosophy and programs to ensure they continue to meet our objectives.


Objectives

We designed our compensation program for all employees, including our named executive officers, to support four main objectives:

recruit and retain the most talented people in a competitive market;

reinforce our values, which serve to motivate our employees to deliver the highest level of performance;

reward success when both our company and the individual succeed; and

align employee and stockholder interests to share in long-term success.

Compensation-Setting Process

Compensation Committee’s Role

The compensation committee has overall responsibility for determining the compensation of our executive officers, including our Chief Executive Officer. Members of the compensation committee are appointed by our board of directors. The compensation committee consists of four members of our board of directors: Michael Lynton, A.G. Lafley, Scott D. Miller, and Poppy Thorpe, none of whom is an executive officer of Snap and each of whom qualifies as an “independent director” under the NYSE rules. Our Chief Executive Officer and other members of our management team provide input to the compensation committee.

Compensation Consultant’s Role

The compensation committee has the authority to engage the services of outside consultants. The compensation committee first retained FW Cook, a national compensation consulting firm, in 2017 as its independent compensation consultant. FW Cook reports directly to the compensation committee.

In January 2020, our compensation committee reviewed FW Cook’s independence under applicable SEC and NYSE rules. Our compensation committee concluded that FW Cook is independent within the meaning of such rules and that its engagement did not present any conflict of interest.

Management’s Role

Management’s role is to make recommendations to the compensation committee regarding our compensation programs and policies, and to implement the programs and policies approved by the compensation committee. Our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the compensation committee with respect to compensation for our executive officers, including our named executive officers, other than himself. The compensation committee considers our Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations, but ultimately has final approval of all compensation for our executive officers, including the types of award and specific amounts. All such determinations by our compensation committee are discretionary. Our co-founders, who serve as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer, respectively, each have base salaries of $1 per year and did not receive any equity awards in 2019.

No executive officer participated directly in the final deliberations or determinations regarding his or her own compensation package or was present during such determinations.

The compensation committee meets regularly in executive session. Our Chief Executive Officer is not present during compensation committee deliberations or votes on his compensation and also recuses himself from sessions of our board of directors where they act on his compensation.


Peer Group

We analyze market data for executive compensation periodically using the most relevant published survey sources, information available from public filings, and input from our compensation consultants. In 2019, the compensation committee requested that FW Cook perform a detailed review of our peer group, considering appropriateness of the current peer companies and potential additions based on similarity in market capitalization size and industry. Based on those considerations and FW Cook’s review, our compensation committee approved removing Pandora, Netflix, Salesforce.com, Paypal, and Booking Holdings. Our peer group for 2019 consisted of the following companies:

Activision

Facebook

TripAdvisor

Autodesk

IAC/InterActive

Twitter

Dropbox

Intuit

VMWare

eBay

Match Group

Workday

Electronic Arts

Spotify

Zillow Group

We use the peer group as a general reference. In addition to the peer group, we also rely on the knowledge and experience of our compensation committee members and our management in determining the appropriate compensation levels for our executive officers.

Elements of Executive Compensation

Our current compensation program generally consists of the following components:

base salary;

equity-based awards; and

other benefits.

We combine these elements to formulate compensation packages that provide competitive pay, reward achievement of financial, operational, and strategic objectives, and align the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. The overall use and weight of each compensation element is based on our subjective determination of the importance of each element in meeting our overall objectives, including motivating executive officers with an owner’s mentality.

Base Salary

We review the base salaries of our executive officers annually and may adjust them from time to time, if needed, to reflect changes in market conditions or other factors. Base salaries of our executive officers generally remain below the 50th percentile compared to our peer group, primarily because we compensate our executive officers mostly with equity awards.

The table below sets forth information regarding the year-end base salary amounts for 2019 for our named executive officers. No base salaries were changed for any of our executive officers in 2019, other than an increase for Ms. Sweet in February 2019 following her appointment as interim Chief Financial Officer and for Mr. Andersen in May 2019 in connection with his appointment as Chief Financial Officer.

Name

 

2019 Base Salary

 

Evan Spiegel

 

$

1

 

Derek Andersen (1)

 

 

500,000

 

Jerry Hunter

 

 

500,000

 

Rebecca Morrow(2)

 

 

400,000

 

Michael O'Sullivan

 

 

500,000

 

Tim Stone(3)

 

 

500,000

 

Lara Sweet(4)

 

 

500,000

 

(1)

Mr. Andersen was appointed as Chief Financial Officer effective May 20, 2019.

(2)

Ms. Morrow joined us as Chief Accounting Officer and Controller effective September 3, 2019. Ms. Morrow’s base salary was approved by our compensation committee in connection with her hire.

(3)

Mr. Stone served as Chief Financial Officer until January 25, 2019.

(4)

Ms. Sweet served as interim Chief Financial Officer from January 26, 2019 until May 19, 2019.


Equity-based Awards

The majority of the total compensation for our executive officers, including our named executive officers, is provided through equity awards. By having a significant portion of our executive officers’ total compensation payable in the form of equity awards that vest over a number of years and are thus subject to higher risk, our executive officers are motivated to align their long-term financial interests with those of our stockholders.

We generally issue three forms of equity awards:

Restricted Stock Awards. RSAs represent the right to receive one share of Class A common stock for each award granted, subject to a forfeiture condition, so the value of the RSAs is tied to the performance of our Class A common stock. The forfeiture condition will typically lapse over multiple years, subject to continued service through each lapse date.

Restricted Stock Units. RSUs represent the right to receive one share of Class A common stock for each unit granted, subject to continued service. Each RSU entitles the holder to one share of Class A common stock for each RSU granted, so the value of the RSUs is tied to the performance of our Class A common stock. RSUs typically vest over multiple years, subject to continued service through each vesting date. 

RSAs and RSUs align the interests of our executive officers and other employees with those of our stockholders. Because RSAs and RSUs have value to the recipient even in the absence of stock price appreciation, these forms of equity awards help us retain and incentivize employees during periods of market volatility.

Stock Options. Stock options are granted with an exercise price based on the market price of Class A common stock on the date of grant (as quoted on the NYSE). The stock options will have value to our executive officers only if the fair market value of our Class A common stock increases after the date of grant, which provides a strong incentive to our executive officers to increase stockholder value. Additionally, stock options typically vest over multiple years, subject to continued service through each vesting date. We view stock options as inherently performance-based and an effective tool to motivate our executive officers to build stockholder value and reinforce our position as a growth company. Although we typically grant RSAs and RSUs to our executive officers, we have granted stock options to our executive officers in limited circumstances.

We generally grant larger, one-time new hire equity awards to our executive officers when they start employment with us. These initial awards are intended to establish a meaningful equity stake and motivate long-term value creation. While these awards generally cover multiple years, we may also consider providing additional equity grants to our executive officers to ensure appropriate incentives are in place to promote our long-term strategic and financial objectives and help us retain key executive officers. The size of these awards is not determined based on a specific formula, but rather through the exercise of judgment after considering various factors, including compensation provided to other executives with similar responsibilities in our peer group and within our company, the current unvested equity held by such executive officer, the perceived retentive value of the proposed awards, and for new-hires, amounts forfeited when joining our company. We also consider each executive officer’s individual performance, including the results and contributions delivered during the year and how they align with our short-term and long-term goals, the executive’s leadership of his or her team, the cash compensation received by the executive officer, and feedback received from the executive officer’s peers and team. Based on such factors, Messrs. Andersen, Hunter, and O’Sullivan and Ms. Sweet received additional equity awards in 2019 as set forth in the section titled “—Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2019.” Ms. Morrow received an equity award in connection with her hire.

Discretionary Performance-based Awards

We reserve the discretion to approve performance-based awards in cash or equity in the future to our executive officers based on each executive officer’s individual performance, our overall performance, and the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer.

Other Benefits

Like other employees, our executive officers, including our named executive officers, participate in our employee benefit and welfare plans, including life and disability insurance, medical and dental care plans, and a 401(k) plan. In 2019, we matched contributions made to our 401(k) plan by our employees up to federal limits, including our named executive officers. All of the named executive officers, other than Mr. Spiegel, participated in our 401(k) plan. Our executive officers, including our named executive officers, also receive access to an on-call medical service paid for by us. Messrs. Hunter and


O’Sullivan participated in such on-call medical services in 2019, and we paid applicable tax gross ups related to such service. We generally do not provide our executive officers with additional retirement benefits, pensions, perquisites, or other personal benefits, except as further described in the section titled “—Summary Compensation Table.” In the future, we may provide perquisites or other personal benefits in limited circumstances, such as where we believe it is appropriate to assist an individual executive in the performance of his or her duties, to make our executive team more efficient and effective, and for recruitment, motivation, or retention purposes. All future practices with respect to perquisites or other personal benefits for executives will be subject to review and approval by the compensation committee.

In connection with Ms. Morrow’s employment and in accordance with our relocation policies, we provided her with certain relocation benefits to assist with her relocation to the Los Angeles area. Please see the section titled “—Summary Compensation Table” for more information.

Executive Security Policy

Based on our overall risk assessment, including the findings of security studies, we have approved an executive security policy that currently provides security for our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer (who is not a named executive officer). The executive security policy may apply to other executive officers as needed. We believe that the personal safety of our executive officers is crucial to our success, and based on our risk assessment, we believe that the cost of the personal security measures for executive officers is an appropriate and necessary business expense. Although we do not consider personal security measures to be a perquisite for the covered executive officer’s benefit, we have included the aggregate incremental costs to us, if any, in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table, as applicable. Please see the section titled “—Summary Compensation Table” for additional detail.

Change of Control Benefits

Our employee equity awards with back-weighted vesting (i.e., 10/20/30/40 vesting), including certain awards held by our named executive officers, accelerate so that the equity award is evenly-weighted if the employee’s employment is involuntary terminated other than for cause or voluntary termination for good reason following a change of control (i.e., “double-trigger”). We believe this change in control benefit makes sense because the logic of back-weighted vesting is that it incentivizes an employee to stay at a company for the entire vesting term; if there is a change in control of a company during the vesting term and the employee’s employment is subsequently terminated by a company involuntarily or by the employee for good reason, the employee cannot stay for the entire vesting term due to reasons beyond the employee’s control. We ceased issuing back-weighted equity awards in early 2018, and Messrs. Hunter and O’Sullivan and Ms. Sweet are the only named executive officers with back-weighted equity vesting that could benefit from such a provision. Our named executive officers are not entitled to any other change of control benefits or post-employment payments with the limited exception of equity acceleration on a termination due to death. For more detail, please see the section titled “—Potential Payments Upon Change in Control.”

Tax and Accounting Considerations

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

Section 162(m) of the Code limits the amount that we may deduct from our U.S. federal taxable income for compensation paid to persons who are “covered employees” for purposes of Section 162(m) to $1 million per covered employee per year. The U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or the Tax Act, enacted in December 2017, made certain changes to Section 162(m). Under the prior law, compensation that qualified as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) was not subject to this deduction limitation. Pursuant to the Tax Act, this exception for “performance-based compensation” was repealed with respect to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, except for certain transition relief for remuneration provided pursuant to a written binding contract that was in effect on November 2, 2017.

As a result, compensation paid to our covered employees in excess of $1 million per year generally will not be deductible unless, among other requirements, it qualifies for the transition relief provided by the Tax Act. As a newly public company, we may benefit from a transition rule under Section 162(m) so that deduction limits generally do not apply to compensation paid pursuant to equity plans and arrangements that were in effect at the time of our IPO, subject to certain exceptions. Because of uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of Section 162(m) and the proposed regulations recently issued thereunder, no assurance can be given that any compensation paid by us will be deductible. We will continue to monitor the applicability of Section 162(m) to our ongoing compensation arrangements.


While we are mindful of the benefit of full tax deductibility of compensation, we also value the flexibility of compensating our executive officers in a manner that can best promote our corporate objectives. Therefore, we may approve compensation that may not be fully deductible.

No Tax Reimbursement of Parachute Payments and Deferred Compensation

We did not provide any executive officer, including any named executive officer, with a “gross-up” or other reimbursement payment for any tax liability that he or she might owe as a result of the application of Sections 280G, 4999, or 409A of the Code during 2019, and we have not agreed and are not otherwise obligated to provide any named executive officer with such a “gross-up” or other reimbursement.

Accounting Treatment

We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with the authoritative guidance set forth in ASC Topic 718, which requires companies to measure and recognize the compensation expense for all share-based awards made to employees and directors, including RSAs, RSUs, and stock options, over the period during which the award recipient is required to perform services in exchange for the award. For executive officers, this is generally the four-year vesting period of the award.

Compensation Policies and Practices as they Relate to Risk Management

Our management team and our compensation committee, with the assistance of our independent compensation consultants, each play a role in evaluating and mitigating any risk that may exist relating to our compensation plans, practices, and policies for all employees, including our named executive officers. In 2019, we reviewed our compensation plans and philosophy and concluded that our compensation programs do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse impact on our business or our financial condition. The objective of the review was to identify any compensation plans, practices, or policies that may encourage employees to take unnecessary risk that could threaten our company. No such plans, practices, or policies were identified. The risk assessment process included, among other things, a review of our cash and equity incentive-based compensation plans to ensure that they are aligned with our company performance goals and ensure an appropriate balance between fixed and variable pay components and between short-term and long-term incentives. The base salary component of our compensation program is designed to provide income independent of our stock price performance so that employees will not focus exclusively on stock price performance to the detriment of other important business metrics. The equity-based component of our compensation program is primarily designed to reward employees evenly throughout their tenure, which we believe discourages employees from taking actions that focus only on specific periods. Furthermore, our executive officers typically receive a substantial portion of their equity in the form of RSAs and RSUs, which does not require our stock price to be trading at certain price for the executive officer to realize value. Executive officer compensation is not tied to any singular performance metric. Additional controls, such as our Code of Conduct and related training, help further mitigate the risks of unethical behavior and inappropriate risk-taking.

Hedging and Pledging Prohibition

Our insider trading policy prohibits all employees (including our executive officers), members of our board of directors, and consultants from engaging in derivative securities transactions, including hedging, pledging company securities as collateral, holding company securities in a margin account, or other inherently speculative transactions with respect to our capital stock.

Rule 10b5-1 Sales Plans

Our executive officers and members of our board of directors may adopt written plans, known as Rule 10b5-1 plans, in which they will contract with a broker to buy or sell shares of our capital stock on a periodic basis. Under a Rule 10b5-1 plan, a broker executes trades under parameters established by the individual when entering into the plan, without further direction from them. The director or officer may amend a Rule 10b5-1 plan in some circumstances and may terminate a plan at any time.


Compensation Committee Report

The compensation committee has reviewed and discussed the compensation discussion and analysis included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the compensation committee recommended to our board of directors that the compensation discussion and analysis be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Snap Inc. compensation committee,

Michael Lynton (Chairman)

A.G. Lafley

Scott D. Miller

Poppy Thorpe

Summary Compensation Table

Our named executive officers as of December 31, 2017 were:

Evan Spiegel, Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer;

Imran Khan, Chief Strategy Officer

Michael O’Sullivan, General Counsel; and

Chris Handman, former General Counsel.

The following table presents all of the compensation awarded to or earned by or paid to our named executive officers during the fiscal years ended December 31, 20162019, 2018, and 2017.

 

Name and Principal Position

 

Year

 

Salary

 

 

Bonus(1)

 

 

Stock Awards(2)

 

All Other

Compensation(3)

 

Total

 

Evan Spiegel

 

2017

 

$

98,078

 

 

$

 

 

$

636,612,889

 

(6)

 

$

1,079,925

 

(8)

 

$

637,790,892

 

Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer

 

2016

 

 

503,205

 

 

 

1,000,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

901,635

 

 

 

 

2,404,840

 

Imran Khan

 

2017

 

 

441,923

 

 

 

 

 

100,061,275

 

(7)

 

 

69,728

 

(9)

 

 

100,572,926

 

Chief Strategy Officer

 

2016

 

 

241,539

 

 

 

5,239,460

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,658

 

 

 

 

5,495,657

 

Michael O’Sullivan(4)

 

2017

 

 

201,923

 

 

 

200,000

 

 

 

16,343,006

 

 

 

 

8,894

 

 

 

 

16,753,823

 

General Counsel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chris Handman(5)

 

2017

 

 

286,827

 

 

 

 

 

 

53,803,861

 

 

 

 

326,457

 

(10)

 

 

54,417,145

 

Former General Counsel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name and Principal Position

 

Year

 

Salary

 

 

Bonus

 

 

Stock Awards(1)

 

 

All Other Compensation

 

 

 

Total

 

Evan Spiegel

 

2019

 

$

1

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,669,809

 

(2)

 

$

1,669,810

 

     Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer

 

2018

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

800,846

 

(3)

 

 

800,847

 

 

 

2017

 

 

98,078

 

 

 

 

 

 

636,612,889

 

(4)

 

1,079,925

 

(5)

 

 

637,790,892

 

Derek Andersen(6)

     Chief Financial Officer

 

2019

 

 

422,404

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,866,092

 

 

 

11,271

 

(7)

 

 

9,299,767

 

Jerry Hunter

 

2019

 

 

500,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,855,000

 

 

 

21,427

 

(8)

 

 

3,376,427

 

     Senior Vice President, Engineering

 

2018

 

 

501,101

 

 

 

 

 

 

882,446

 

 

 

21,108

 

(9)

 

 

1,404,655

 

Rebecca Morrow(10)

     Chief Accounting Officer

 

2019

 

 

121,539

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,130,500

 

 

 

74,133

 

(11)

 

 

4,326,172

 

Michael O'Sullivan(12)

 

2019

 

 

500,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,565,000

 

 

 

15,830

 

(13)

 

 

9,080,830

 

     General Counsel

 

2018

 

 

500,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

426,415

 

 

 

17,940

 

(14)

 

 

944,355

 

 

 

2017

 

 

201,923

 

 

 

200,000

 

 

 

16,343,006

 

 

 

8,894

 

 

 

 

16,753,823

 

Tim Stone(15)

 

2019

 

 

61,538

 

 

 

 

 

 

314,890

 

(16)

 

3,165

 

 

 

 

379,593

 

     Former Chief Financial Officer

 

2018

 

 

303,846

 

 

 

 

 

 

23,930,230

 

 

 

764,815

 

(17)

 

 

24,998,891

 

Lara Sweet(18)

     Former interim Chief Financial Officer

 

2019

 

 

479,365

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,565,000

 

 

 

8,440

 

(19)

 

 

9,052,805

 

 

(1)

Amounts reported represent bonuses awarded at the discretion of our board of directors.

(2)

Amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUsthe equity awards without regard to forfeitures, granted to our named executive officers under our 2017 Plan or our 2014 Plan, computedcalculated in accordance with ASC Topic 718. The valuation assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the RSUs is set forth in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Stock-Based Compensation.” This amount doesThese amounts do not reflect the actual economic value that may be realized by the named executive officer.officers. For a discussion of the valuation of the equity awards, including the assumptions used, see Notes 1 and 4 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements.

(3)(2)

AmountsAmount reported include 401(k) contributions,includes (a) $1,276,623 for security for Mr. Spiegel, (b) $13,864 of imputed income relating to incremental costs of family or guests accompanying Mr. Spiegel on business flights that Mr. Spiegel cannot reimburse under the Federal Aviation Regulations, (c) $378,472 in incremental costs for personal flights not reimbursed by Mr. Spiegel, (d) life insurance premiums and membership fees for a concierge medical service paid by us on behalf of Mr. Spiegel, (e) $420 for a financial services program provided to executives, and (f) related tax “gross up” payments paid to Mr. Spiegel to cover the named executive officer.imputed income associated with the membership in the financial services program.Amounts not quantified above total less than $10,000 in aggregate.

(4)(3)

Amount reported includes (a) $132,235 for our payment of the fees associated with Mr. O’Sullivan joinedSpiegel’s filing in 2018 under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, or HSR Act, including legal fees incurred in connection with the filing, otherwise payable by Mr. Spiegel, as approved by the compensation committee of our board of directors in October 2018, (b) $166,195 in related tax “gross up” payments paid to Mr. Spiegel to cover the imputed income associated with the 2018 HSR Act filing fee and legal fees, (c) $486,781 for security for Mr. Spiegel, (d) $5,000 in medical on-call services paid by us as General Counsel effective July 31, 2017.on behalf of Mr. Spiegel, (e) life insurance premiums paid by us on behalf of Mr. Spiegel, (f) tax “gross up” payments paid to Mr. Spiegel to cover the imputed income associated with the medical on-call services, and (g) $6,376 of imputed income relating to incremental costs of family or guests accompanying Mr. Spiegel on business flights that Mr. Spiegel cannot reimburse under the Federal Aviation Regulations. Amounts not quantified above total less than $10,000 in aggregate.

(5)

Mr. Handman stepped down as General Counsel and ceased to be an employee effective August 1, 2017. Following August 1, 2017, Mr. Handman provided advisory services to us.


(6)(4)

Amount reported represents a one-time performance award granted to Mr. Spiegel in connection with our initial public offering in March 2017.

(7)(5)

Amount reported represents a one-time performance award granted to Mr. Khan in January 2017. The award vests over a period of eleven years from the grant date.


(8)

Amount reported includes (a) accrued vacation as of May 31, 2017, which amount was paid out as a result of our transition to a flexible vacation policy, (b) $280,000$294,242 for our payment of the fees associated with Mr. Spiegel’s filing in 2017 under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust ImprovementHSR Act of 1976, as amended,including legal fees incurred in connection with the filing, otherwise payable by Mr. Spiegel, as approved by the compensation committee of our board of directors in November 2017, and as further described(c) $211,124 in “—Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvement Act of 1976 Filing Fees”, (c) legal fees incurred by Mr. Spiegel in connection with the HSR Act filings, which were paid by us on behalf of Mr. Spiegel, (d) $211,124 inrelated tax “gross up” payments paid to Mr. Spiegel to cover the imputed income associated with the 2017 HSR Act filing fee and related legal fees, (d) $561,892 for security for Mr. Spiegel, (e) medical and dental premiums paid by us on behalf of Mr. Spiegel, and (f) tax “gross up” payments paid to Mr. Spiegel to cover the imputed income associated with the medical and dental premiums, and (g) $561,892 for security for Mr. Spiegel.premiums. Amounts not quantified above total less than $10,000 in aggregate.

(9)(6)

Mr. Andersen was appointed as Chief Financial Officer effective May 20, 2019.

(7)

Amount reported includes (a) $55,386$9,788 in accrued vacation401(k) plan matching contributions by us, (b) life insurance premiums paid by us on behalf of Mr. Andersen, (c) $420 in a financial services program provided to executives, (d) tax “gross up” payments paid to Mr. Andersen to cover the imputed income associated with the financial services program. Amounts not quantified above total less than $10,000 in aggregate.

(8)

Amount reported includes (a) $11,200 in 401(k) plan matching contributions by us, (b) life insurance premiums paid by us on behalf of Mr. Hunter, (c) $5,000 in medical on-call services paid by us on behalf of Mr. Hunter, and (d) tax “gross up” payments paid to Mr. Hunter to cover the imputed income associated with the medical on-call services. Amounts not quantified above total less than $10,000 in aggregate.

(9)

Amount reported includes (a) $11,000 in 401(k) plan matching contributions by us, (b) life insurance premiums paid by us on behalf of Mr. Hunter, (c) $5,000 in medical on-call services paid by us on behalf of Mr. Hunter, (d) meal allowance provided by us, and (e) tax “gross up” payments paid to Mr. Hunter to cover the imputed income associated with the medical on-call services and meal allowance. Amounts not quantified above total less than $10,000 in aggregate.

(10)

Ms. Morrow joined us as Chief Accounting Officer and Controller effective September 3, 2019.

(11)

Amount reported includes (a) $1,585 in 401(k) plan matching contributions by us, (b) life insurance premiums paid by us on behalf of MayMs. Morrow, (c) $420 in a financial services program provided to executives, (d) tax “gross up” payments paid to Ms. Morrow to cover the imputed income associated with the financial services program, (e) $45,000 in relocation expenses paid by us on behalf of Ms. Morrow, and (f) $26,713 in tax “gross up” payments paid to Ms. Morrow to cover the imputed income associated with the relocation expenses. Amounts not quantified above total less than $10,000 in aggregate.

(12)

Mr. O’Sullivan joined us as General Counsel effective July 31, 2017, which2017.

(13)

Amount reported includes (a) $6,923 in 401(k) plan matching contributions by us, (b) life insurance premiums paid by us on behalf of Mr. O’Sullivan, (c) $5,000 in medical on-call services paid by us on behalf of Mr. O’Sullivan, (d) $420 in a financial services program provided to executives, and (e) tax “gross up” payments paid to Mr. O’Sullivan to cover the imputed income associated with the medical on-call services and the financial services program. Amounts not quantified above total less than $10,000 in aggregate.

(14)

Amount reported includes (a) $6,923 in 401(k) plan matching contributions by us, (b) life insurance premiums paid by us on behalf of Mr. O’Sullivan, (c) $5,000 in medical on-call services paid by us on behalf of Mr. O’Sullivan, (d) $420 in a financial services program provided to executives, (e) meal allowance provided by us, and (f) tax “gross up” payments paid to Mr. O’Sullivan to cover the imputed income associated with the medical on-call services, the financial services program, and meal allowance. Amounts not quantified above total less than $10,000 in aggregate.

(15)

Mr. Stone served as Chief Financial Officer until January 25, 2019 and terminated his employment on February 5, 2019.

(16)

Amount reported is the aggregate modification date fair value of previously granted equity awards in accordance with ASC Topic 718. This amount was paid out asdoes not reflect a result of our transition to a flexible vacation policy, (b)new award or the actual economic value that may be realized by Mr. Stone.

(17)

Amount reported includes (a) $663,303 in relocation expenses paid by us on behalf of Mr. Khan, and (c)Stone, (b) $79,906 in tax “gross up” payments paid to Mr. KhanStone to cover the imputed income associated with the relocation expenses.

(10)

Amount reported includes (a) $58,463expenses, (c) $11,000 in accrued vacation as401(k) plan matching contributions by us, (d) $5,000 in medical on-call services paid by us on behalf of May 31, 2017, which amount was paid out as a result of our transition to a flexible vacation policy, (b) $10,000 for COBRAMr. Stone, (e) life insurance premiums paid by us on behalf of Mr. Handman, (c) $22,798Stone, (f) a nominal transportation gift card to Mr. Stone, and (g) tax “gross up” payments paid to Mr. Stone to cover the imputed income associated with the medical on-call services and the gift card. Amounts not quantified above total less than $10,000 in aggregate. Under the transition agreement entered into with Mr. Stone in February 2019 in connection with his resignation from the company, we waived his obligation to reimburse us for travelhis relocation expenses, including the associated tax “gross up” payments.

(18)

Ms. Sweet served asinterim Chief Financial Officer from January 26, 2019 until May 19, 2019.

(19)

Amount reported includes (a) $7,636 in 401(k) plan matching contributions by us and (b) life insurance premiums paid by us for Mr. Handman, and (d) $221,500on behalf of Ms. Sweet. Amounts not quantified above total less than $10,000 in advisor fees paid by us to Mr. Handman.aggregate.


Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2019

The following table provides information regarding grants of incentive plan-based awards made to each of our named executive officers during 2019 under our 2017 Plan. No named executive officer was granted options in 2019.

Name

 

Grant Date

 

All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units(1)

 

 

Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards(2)

 

Evan Spiegel

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Derek Andersen

 

3/4/2019

 

 

30,352

 

(3)

 

301,092

 

 

 

5/16/2019

 

 

750,000

 

(4)

 

8,565,000

 

Jerry Hunter

 

5/16/2019

 

 

250,000

 

(5)

 

2,855,000

 

Rebecca Morrow

 

9/10/2019

 

 

275,000

 

(6)

 

4,130,500

 

Michael O'Sullivan

 

5/16/2019

 

 

750,000

 

(5)

 

8,565,000

 

Tim Stone

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lara Sweet

 

5/16/2019

 

 

750,000

 

(5)

 

8,565,000

 

(1)

Except as indicated below, equity awards vest and the forfeiture condition lapses only on the satisfaction of a service-based vesting condition. If an employee dies while in service, the service-based vesting condition as to 100% of his or her shares subject to the award will be satisfied.

(2)

The dollar amounts reflect the grant date fair value of the equity awards without regard to forfeitures, calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 718. These amounts do not reflect the actual economic value realized by the named executive officers. For a discussion of the valuation of the equity awards, see Notes 1 and 4 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements.

(3)

The service-based condition will be satisfied for these RSUs in 48 equal monthly installments after each month of continuous service from February 15, 2019.

(4)

The service-based condition will be satisfied, and the forfeiture condition will lapse, as to 1/16th of the shares underlying this RSA after each quarter of continuous service from June 15, 2019.

(5)

The service-based condition will be satisfied, and the forfeiture condition will lapse, as to 1/16th of the shares underlying this RSA after each quarter of continuous service from May 15, 2019.

(6)

The service-based condition will be satisfied, and the forfeiture condition will lapse, as to 1/16th of the shares underlying this RSA after each quarter of continuous service from October 15, 2019.


Outstanding Equity Awards as of December 31, 20172019

The following table presents information regarding outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2017.2019. Other than awardsthe award granted to Mr. Spiegel, all awards are for Class A common stock and were granted under our 2012 Plan, 2014 Plan, for awards granted before March 1, 2017, or our 2017 Plan, as noted below. None of our named executive officers held options as of December 31,for awards granted on or after March 1, 2017.

 

 

 

 

 

Stock Awards

 

Name

 

Grant

Date

 

Number of

Shares or Units of Stock

That Have Not Vested

(#)(1)

 

Market Value of

Shares or Units of Stock

That Have Not Vested

($)(2)

 

Evan Spiegel

 

03/07/2017

 

 

 

(3)

 

 

 

Imran Khan

 

04/16/2015

 

4,493,084

 

(4)(5)

 

 

65,643,957

 

 

 

01/27/2017

 

6,127,451

 

(6)

 

 

89,522,059

 

Michael O’Sullivan

 

09/08/2017

 

1,038,750

 

(4)(7)

 

 

15,176,138

 

Chris Handman

 

05/06/2014

 

383,334

 

(4)(8)

 

 

5,600,510

 

 

 

04/16/2015

 

306,668

 

(4)(9)

 

 

4,480,419

 

 

 

05/05/2017

 

2,204,126

 

(4)(10)

 

 

31,210,424

 

 

 

 

 

Stock Awards

 

 

Option Awards

Name

 

Grant Date

 

Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(#)(1)

 

 

Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested($)(2)

 

 

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable

 

 

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable(1)

 

 

Option Exercise Price

 

 

Option Expiration Date

Evan Spiegel

 

3/7/2017

 

 

(3)

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

Derek Andersen

 

7/26/2018

 

 

498,750

 

(4)

 

8,144,588

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/4/2019

 

 

24,029

 

(5)

 

392,394

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5/16/2019

 

 

656,250

 

(6)

 

10,716,563

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jerry Hunter

 

10/26/2016

 

 

781,252

 

(7)

 

12,757,845

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12/29/2017

 

 

262,412

 

(8)

 

4,285,188

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12/29/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

210,000

 

 

 

490,000

 

(9)

 

14.72

 

 

12/29/2027

 

 

5/16/2019

 

 

218,750

 

(10)

 

3,572,188

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rebecca Morrow

 

9/10/2019

 

 

275,000

 

(11)

 

4,490,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michael O'Sullivan

 

9/8/2017

 

 

665,866

 

(12)

 

10,873,592

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5/16/2019

 

 

656,250

 

(10)

 

10,716,563

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tim Stone(13)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lara Sweet

 

7/15/2016

 

 

117,188

 

(14)

 

1,913,680

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/14/2017

 

 

10,181

 

(15)

 

166,256

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6/5/2017

 

 

6,381

 

(16)

 

104,202

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12/29/2017

 

 

14,805

 

(17)

 

241,766

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12/29/2017

 

 

104,965

 

(18)

 

1,714,078

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5/16/2019

 

 

656,250

 

(10)

 

10,716,563

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Except as indicated below, eachEach of our named executive officers, other than Mr. Spiegel, holds RSUsequity awards that only vest, and settleor the forfeiture condition only lapses, on the satisfaction of both (i) a service-based vesting condition and (ii)condition. RSUs granted prior to 2017 also include a performance condition. The performance condition that was satisfied on the effective date of the registration statement filed in connection with our initial public offering in March 2017. The service-based vesting condition for each of our named executive officers is further described below. If an executive officer dies while in our service, the service-based condition as to 100% of his or her shares subject to the award will be satisfied.

(2)

The market value is based on the closing price forof our Class A common stock or Class B common stock, as applicable, is based on $14.61, our closing market price on December 29, 2017, as reported by The New York Stock Exchange. This value assumes that the fair market values of the Class B common stock and Class C common stock underlying the RSUs,31, 2019, which are not listed or approved for trading on or with any securities exchange or association, are equal to the fair market value of our Class A common stock.was $16.33. Each share of Class C common stock is convertible into one share of Class B common stock, and each share of Class B common stock is convertible into one share of Class A common stock, in each case at any time at the option of the holder or on certain transfers of such shares.

(3)

Mr. Spiegel was granted an award of RSUs for 34,447,81737,447,817 shares of Class C common stock, as described in the section titled “Employment, Severance, and Change in Control Agreements—Offer Letters—Evan Spiegel.” These RSUs were fully vested on the closing of our initial public offering in March 2017 and will beare being delivered to Mr. Spiegel in equal quarterly installments over three years beginningthat began in November 30, 2017. As of December 31, 2017, 3,120,6512019, 9,361,955 shares underlying the RSUs had been deliveredwith a market value of $152,880,725 (based on the closing price of our Class A common stock on December 31, 2019) were remaining for delivery to Mr. Spiegel. This RSU grant was a one-time performance award granted to Mr. Spiegel in connection with our initial public offering in March 2017.

(4)

The service-based condition for these RSUs is satisfied in 48 equal monthly installments after each month of continuous service from August 15, 2018.

(5)

The service-based condition for these RSUs is satisfied in 48 equal monthly installments after each month of continuous service from February 15, 2019.

(6)

The service-based condition will be satisfied, and the forfeiture condition will lapse, as to 1/16th of the shares underlying this RSA after each quarter of continuous service from June 15, 2019.

(7)

The service-based condition for these RSUs is satisfied as follows (in each case subject to continued service through each vesting date): 10% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following October 24, 2016; 20% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following October 24, 2017; 30% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following October 24, 2018; and 40% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following October 24, 2019. The unvested shares subject to these RSUs are subject to accelerated vesting as described in the section titled “—Employment, Severance, and Change in Control Agreements.”


(5)(8)

These RSUs represent 2,246,542 shares of Class A common stock and 2,246,542 shares of Class B common stock granted under our 2012 Plan. The service-based condition was satisfied for 4,966,040 shares underlying thethese RSUs on December 31, 2017. The service-based condition will beis satisfied as follows: 7.5%follows (in each case subject to continued service through each vesting date): 10% of the RSUs will have the service-based condition satisfied on January 16, 2018; and 40% of the RSUs will have the service-based condition satisfied in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following January 16, 2018.15, 2018; 20% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following January 15, 2019; 30% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following January 15, 2020; and 40% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following January 15, 2021. The unvested shares subject to these RSUs are subject to accelerated vesting as described in the section titled “—Employment, Severance, and Change in Control Agreements.”

(6)(9)

These RSUs represent shares of Class A common stock granted under our 2014 Plan. The service-based condition wasfor these options is satisfied for noas follows (in each case subject to continued service through each vesting date): 10% of the options in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following December 29, 2017; 20% of the options in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following December 29, 2018; 30% of the options in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following December 29, 2019; and 40% of the options in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following December 29, 2020. The unvested shares underlyingsubject to these options are subject to accelerated vesting as described in the RSUs on December 31, 2017. section titled “—Employment, Severance, and Change in Control Agreements.”

(10)

The service-based condition will be satisfied, and the forfeiture condition will lapse, as follows: 2.5%to 1/16th of the RSUs will have the service-based condition satisfied on April 16, 2018, and the remaindershares underlying this RSA after each quarter of the RSUs will have the service-based condition satisfied in 39 equal quarterly installments thereafter. This RSU grant does not have a performance condition. This RSU grant was a one-time performance award granted to Mr. Khan in January 2017.continuous service from May 15, 2019.

(7)(11)

These RSUs represent shares of Class A common stock granted under our 2017 Plan. The service-based condition was satisfied for 26,365 shares underlying the RSUs on December 31, 2017. The service-based condition will be satisfied, and the forfeiture condition will lapse, as follows: 2.5%to 1/16th of the RSUs will have theshares underlying this RSA after each quarter of continuous service from October 15, 2019.

(12)

The service-based condition for these RSUs is satisfied onas follows (in each of February 15, 2018, May 15, 2018, and August 15, 2018, 20%case subject to continued service through each vesting date): 10% of the RSUs will have the service-based condition satisfied in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following August 15, 2018, 30%2017; 20% of the RSUs will have the service-based condition satisfied in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following August 15, 2019, and 40%2018; 30% of the RSUs will have the service-based condition satisfied in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following August 15, 2020. This RSU grant does not have a performance condition.2019; and 40% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following August 15, 2020. The unvested shares subject to these RSUs are subject to accelerated vesting as described in the section titled “—Employment, Severance, and Change in Control Agreements.”

(8)(13)

These RSUs represent 191,667 shares of shares of Class A common stock and 191,667 shares of shares of Class B common stock granted under our 2012 Plan. The service-based condition was satisfied for 1,916,666 shares underlying the RSUs on December 31, 2017. The service-based condition will be satisfiedMr. Stone served as follows: 3.3% of the RSUs will have the service-based condition satisfied on each ofChief Financial Officer until January 1, 2018, February 1, 2018, March 1, 2018, April 1, 2018, and May 1, 2018.25, 2019.

(9)(14)

These RSUs represent 153,334 shares of shares of Class A common stock and 153,334 shares of shares of Class B common stock granted under our 2014 Plan. The service-based condition was satisfied for 1,533,332 shares underlying thethese RSUs on December 31, 2017. The service-based condition will beis satisfied as follows: 3.3%follows (in each case subject to continued service through each vesting date): 10% of the RSUs will havein equal quarterly installments during the service-based condition satisfied on each12-month period following June 27, 2016; 20% of January 1, 2018, February 1, 2018, March 1, 2018, April 1, 2018,the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following June 27, 2017; 30% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following June 27, 2018; and May 1, 2018.40% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following June 27, 2019. The unvested shares subject to these RSUs are subject to accelerated vesting as described in the section titled “—Employment, Severance, and Change in Control Agreements.

(10)(15)

TheseThe service-based condition for these RSUs representis satisfied as follows (in each case subject to continued service through each vesting date): 10% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following February 15, 2017; 20% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following February 15, 2018; 30% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following February 15, 2019; and 40% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following February 15, 2020. The unvested shares subject to these RSUs are subject to accelerated vesting as described in the section titled “—Employment, Severance, and Change in Control Agreements.

(16)

The service-based condition for these RSUs is satisfied as follows (in each case subject to continued service through each vesting date): 10% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following May 15, 2017; 20% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following May 15, 2018; 30% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following May 15, 2019; and 40% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following May 15, 2020. The unvested shares subject to these RSUs are subject to accelerated vesting as described in the section titled “—Employment, Severance, and Change in Control Agreements.

(17)

The service-based condition for these RSUs is satisfied as follows (in each case subject to continued service through each vesting date): 10% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following November 15, 2017; 20% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following November 15, 2018; 30% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following November 15, 2019; and 40% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following November 15, 2020. The unvested shares subject to these RSUs are subject to accelerated vesting as described in the section titled “—Employment, Severance, and Change in Control Agreements.

(18)

The service-based condition for these RSUs is satisfied as follows (in each case subject to continued service through each vesting date): 10% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following January 15, 2018; 20% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following January 15, 2019; 30% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following January 15, 2020; and 40% of the RSUs in equal quarterly installments during the 12-month period following January 15, 2021. The unvested shares subject to these RSUs are subject to accelerated vesting as described in the section titled “—Employment, Severance, and Change in Control Agreements.


Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table presents information regarding options exercised by our named executive officers during 2019 and the vesting or lapse of the forfeiture condition during 2019 of RSUs and RSAs previously granted to the named executive officers.

Name

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)

Value Realized on Exercise ($)(1)

Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)

Value Realized on Vesting ($)(2)

Evan Spiegel(3)

$             —

$            —

Derek Andersen

452,042

5,843,648

Jerry Hunter

855,247

10,636,928

Rebecca Morrow

Michael O’Sullivan

406,228

5,438,092

Tim Stone

83,332

29,166

98,338

769,987

Lara Sweet

489,409

6,870,999

(1)

The value realized on the exercise of an option represents the difference between the closing price of our Class A common stock granted under our 2017 Plan. The service-based condition was satisfied for 116,006 shares underlyingon the RSUs on December 31, 2017. The service-based condition will be satisfied as follows: 2.5%date of exercise and the exercise price of the RSUs will haveoption, and does not necessarily reflect the service-based condition satisfied on February 15, 2018, and the remaindersales price of the shares or if a sale had been made.

(2)

The value realized is based on the closing price of our Class A common stock on the vesting date.

(3)

Mr. Spiegel was granted an award of RSUs will havefor 37,447,817 shares of Class C common stock, as described in the service-based condition satisfiedsection titled “Employment, Severance, and Change in 37Control Agreements—Offer Letters—Evan Spiegel.” These RSUs were fully vested on the closing of our initial public offering in March 2017 and are being delivered to Mr. Spiegel in equal quarterly installments thereafter. This RSU grant does not have a performance condition. This RSU grant was a one-time performance award grantedover three years that began in November 2017. In 2019, 12,482,605 shares of Class C common stock with an aggregate value of $164,676,769, based on the closing price of our Class A common stock on the applicable delivery dates, were delivered to Mr. Handman in May 2017.Spiegel.

Emerging Growth Company Status

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act. As an emerging growth company, we are exempt from certain requirements related to executive compensation, including the requirements to hold nonbinding advisory votes on executive compensation and to provide information relating to the ratio of total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer to the median of the annual total compensation of all of our employees, each as required by the Investor Protection and Securities Reform Act of 2010, which is part of the Dodd-Frank Act.

Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvement Act of 1976 Filing Fees

The Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvement Act of 1976, as amended, or the HSR Act, generally requires certain individuals who hold more than a certain amount of value in our stock to make a filing under the HSR Act, unless an exception applies. The net settlement of the first quarterly installment of the CEO award previously granted to Mr. Spiegel triggered an HSR Act filing requirement for both Mr. Spiegel and us. After deliberation, and in consideration of the fact that the filing was triggered by the CEO award that we had granted to Mr. Spiegel, the compensation committee of our board of directors approved our direct payment to the government of the HSR Act filing fee that otherwise would have been payable by Mr. Spiegel, including any associated legal fees payable by Mr. Spiegel as a result of the HSR Act filing. Additionally, we provided a tax “gross up” payment to Mr. Spiegel to cover the imputed income associated with this payment.


Pension Benefits

Our named executive officers did not participate in, or otherwise receive any benefits under, any pension or retirement plan sponsored by us during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2019.

Non-qualified Deferred Compensation

Our named executive officers did not participate in, or earn any benefits under, a non-qualified deferred compensation plan sponsored by us during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2019.

Employment, Severance, and Change in Control Agreements

Offer Letters

We have offer letters with each of our executive officers. The offer letters generally provide for at-will employment and set forth the executive officer’s initial base salary, eligibility for employee benefits, and confirmation of the terms of previously issued equity grants, if applicable, including in some cases severance benefits on a qualifying termination of employment. If an executive officer dies, all outstanding RSUsequity awards will be deemed to satisfy the service-based vesting requirement. In addition, each of our named executive officers has executed our standard proprietary information and inventions agreement. The key terms of employment with our executive officers are described below.

Evan Spiegel

In October 2016, we entered into an amended and restated offer letter agreement with Evan Spiegel, our co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, with respect to his continuing employment with us. The offer letter provides for an annual base salary of $500,000, which was reduced to $1 on the effective date of the registration statement in connection with our initial public offering in March 2017, and an annual cash bonus of $1,000,000 based on achievement of performance criteria to be mutually agreed on by Mr. Spiegel and our board of directors. Mr. Spiegel waived any bonus for the period from July 31, 2016 through our initial public offering. Following our initial public offering, Mr. Spiegel is not entitled to any bonus except as may be determined by our board of directors.$1. Under the terms of his offer letter, Mr. Spiegel was granted an award of RSUs for 34,447,81737,447,817 shares of Class C common stock, which represented 3.0% of our outstanding capital stock on an as-converted basis on the closing of our initial public offering in March 2017. These RSUs were fully vested on the closing of our initial public offering and are being delivered to Mr. Spiegel in equal quarterly installments over three years beginningthat began on November 30, 2017. Our board of directors approved the award to Mr. Spiegel in July 2015 to motivate him to continue growing our business and improving our financial results so that we could undertake an initial public offering, which we regard as an important milestone that provided liquidity to our stockholders and employees.


Robert Murphy

In October 2016, we entered into an amended and restated offer letter agreement with Robert Murphy, our co-founder and Chief Technology Officer, with respect to his continuing employment with us. Mr. Murphy’s annual base salary as of December 31, 20172019 was $250,000. Mr. Murphy’s salary was reduced to $1 in January 2018.$1.

Imran KhanDerek Andersen

In October 2016,May 2019, we entered into an amended and restated offer letter agreement with Imran Khan,Derek Andersen, our Chief StrategyFinancial Officer, with respect to his continuing employment with us. Mr. Khan’sAndersen’s annual base salary as of December 31, 2019 was $500,000.

Jeremi Gorman

In October 2018, we entered into an offer letter agreement with Jeremi Gorman, our Chief Business Officer, with respect to her employment with us. Ms. Gorman’s annual base salary as of December 31, 2019 was $500,000.

Jared Grusd

In October 2018, we entered into an offer letter agreement with Jared Grusd, our Chief Strategy Officer, with respect to his employment with us. Mr. Grusd’s annual base salary as of December 31, 2019 was $500,000.

Jerry Hunter

In December 2017, we entered into an amended and restated offer letter agreement with Jerry Hunter, our Senior Vice President, Engineering, with respect to his continuing employment with us. Mr. Hunter’s annual base salary as of December 31, 2019 was $450,000.$500,000.

If Mr. Khan’sHunter’s employment is terminated without cause or he terminates his employment for good reason, within 12 months following a change in control, then with respect to the grant of RSUs made to Mr. Khan in 2015 only, in addition to the RSUs that have satisfied the service-based vesting requirement an additional 50% offor the then-outstanding RSUs granted prior to 2018 will be deemed satisfied with respect to satisfy1/16th of the service-basedRSUs for each completed quarter of service since the vesting requirement.commencement date. Mr. KhanHunter must sign a release of claims agreement as a pre-condition of receiving this termination benefit.


Andrew VolleroRebecca Morrow

In October 2016,July 2019, we entered into an amended and restated offer letter agreement with Andrew Vollero,Rebecca Morrow, our Chief FinancialAccounting Officer and Controller, with respect to his continuingher employment with us. Mr. Vollero’sMs. Morrow’s annual base salary as of December 31, 20172019 was $450,000. Under the terms of his amended and restated offer letter, Mr. Vollero received an annual supplemental payment of $200,000 during the first two years of his employment.

If Mr. Vollero’s employment is terminated without cause or he terminates his employment for good reason, within 12 months following a change in control, then (a) with respect to the grant of RSUs made to Mr. Vollero in 2015 only, in addition to the RSUs that have satisfied the service-based vesting requirement, an additional 50% of the then-outstanding RSUs will be deemed to satisfy the service-based vesting requirement and (b) with respect to the grant of RSUs made to Mr. Vollero in 2017 only, the service-based vesting requirement will be deemed satisfied with respect to 1/16th of the RSUs for each completed quarter of service since the vesting commencement date. Mr. Vollero must sign a release of claims agreement as a pre-condition of receiving this termination benefit.$400,000.

Michael O’Sullivan

In July 2017, we entered into an offer letter agreement with Michael O’Sullivan, our general counsel,General Counsel, with respect to his employment with us. Mr. O’Sullivan’s annual base salary as of December 31, 20172019 was $500,000. Under the terms of his offer letter agreement, Mr. O’Sullivan received a one-time hiring bonus of $200,000.

If Mr. O’Sullivan’s employment is terminated without cause or he terminates his employment for good reason, within 12 months following a change in control, then the service-based vesting requirement for the RSUs granted prior to 2018 will be deemed satisfied with respect to 1/16th16th of the RSUs for each completed quarter of service since the vesting commencement date. Mr. O’Sullivan must sign a release of claims agreement as a pre-condition of receiving this termination benefit.

Lara Sweet

In November 2017, we entered into an amended and restated offer letter agreement with Lara Sweet, who at the time was serving as our chief accounting officer,Chief Accounting Officer, with respect to her continuing employment with us. Ms. Sweet’s annual base salary as of December 31, 20172019 was $315,000.$500,000.


If Ms. Sweet’s employment is terminated without cause or she terminates her employment for good reason, within 12 months following a change in control, then the service-based vesting requirement for the RSUs granted prior to 2018 will be deemed satisfied with respect to 1/16th16th of the RSUs for each completed quarter of service since the vesting commencement date. Ms. Sweet must sign a release of claims agreement as a pre-condition of receiving this termination benefit.

Steven HorowitzTransition Agreements

In October 2016,February 2019, we entered into an amended and restated offer lettera transition agreement with Steven Horowitz,Tim Stone, our Vice Presidentformer Chief Financial Officer. Under the transition agreement, we waived his obligation to reimburse us for his relocation expenses and accelerated the vesting by ten days of Engineering. Mr. Horowitz’s annual base salary asan aggregate of 59,586 shares subject to unvested RSAs, RSUs, and stock options.

Potential Payments upon Change in Control or Death

The following table sets forth the estimated payments that would be received by the named executive officers if a hypothetical termination of employment without cause or following a resignation for good reason following a change of control of our company had occurred on December 31, 20172019.

Name

Accelerated Vesting of RSUs(1)

Evan Spiegel

$

Derek Andersen

Jerry Hunter

5,855,350

Rebecca Morrow

Michael O'Sullivan

3,261,999

Tim Stone

Lara Sweet

1,304,767

(1)

The amount reported reflects the aggregate market value, based on the closing price of our Class A common stock of $16.33 on December 31, 2019, of the unvested RSUs that would be accelerated.

The table below reflects amounts that would have been received by each named executive officer assuming that his or her employment was $309,000.

Advisor Agreement

In July 2017, we entered into an advisor agreement with Chris Handman, our former general counsel. Mr. Handman’s monthly advisor fee as ofterminated due to his or her death on December 31, 2017 was $55,500.2019.

If Mr. Handman’s advisor agreement is terminated by us in the absence of a material breach by him of certain provisions of the agreement, then the service-based vesting requirement will be deemed satisfied with respect to all RSUs that were scheduled to vest through August 16, 2018.

Name

Accelerated Vesting of Stock Awards and Options(1)

Evan Spiegel

$

Derek Andersen

19,253,545

Jerry Hunter

21,404,121

Rebecca Morrow

4,490,750

Michael O'Sullivan

21,590,155

Tim Stone

Lara Sweet

14,856,545

(1)

The amount reported reflects the aggregate value, based on the closing price of our Class A common stock of $16.33 on December 31, 2019, of the unvested equity awards that would be accelerated. For such purpose, the value realized upon the exercise of an option is calculated as the difference between the closing price of our Class A common stock on December 31, 2019 and the exercise price of the option.

Employee Benefit Plans

We believe that our ability to grant equity-based awards is a valuable and necessary compensation tool that aligns the long-term financial interests of our employees, consultants, and directors with the financial interests of our stockholders. In addition, we believe that our ability to grant options and other equity-based awards helps us to attract, retain, and motivate employees, consultants, and directors, and encourages them to devote their best efforts to our business and financial success. The principal features of our equity incentive plans and our 401(k) plan are summarized below. These summaries are qualified in their entirety by reference to the actual text of the plans.


401(k) Plan and Similar Plans

We maintain a safe harbor 401(k) plan that provides eligible U.S. employees with an opportunity to save for retirement on a tax advantaged basis. Eligible employees are able to defer eligible compensation up to certain Code limits, which are updated annually. We have the ability to make matching and discretionary contributions to the 401(k) plan. Currently, we make a match of each participant’s contribution up to federal limits of the participant’s base salary, bonus, and commissions paid during the period, and we make match of 50% of each participant’s contribution between 3% and 5% of the participant’s base salary, bonus, and commissions paid during the period. Contributions are allocated to each participant’s individual account and are then invested in selected investment alternatives according to the participants’ directions. Employees are immediately and fully vested in their own contributions and our contributions. The 401(k) plan is intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code, with the related trust intended to be tax exempt under Section 501(a) of the Code. As a tax-qualified retirement plan, contributions to the 401(k) plan are deductible by us when made, and contributions and earnings on those amounts are not taxable to the employees until withdrawn or distributed from the 401(k) plan.

Similar plans outside the United States, some of which are government mandated, cover employees of certain of our international subsidiaries. Several of these plans allow us to match, on a voluntary basis, a portion of the employee contributions.

2017 Equity Incentive Plan

Our board of directors adopted our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan, or our 2017 Plan, in January 2017, and our stockholders approved our 2017 Plan in February 2017. Our 2017 Plan became effective once the registration statement in connection with our initial public offering was declared effective. Our 2017 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options to employees, including employees of any parent or subsidiary, and for the grant of nonstatutory stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, performance stock awards, performance cash awards, and other forms of stock awards to employees, directors, and consultants, including employees and consultants of our affiliates. The 2017 Plan is the successor to our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan and 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, each of which is described below, or, together, the Prior Plans.

Authorized Shares. The maximum number of shares of our Class A common stock that may be issued under our 2017 Plan as of December 31, 20172019 is 95,735,623.105,054,933. The number of shares of our Class A common stock reserved for issuance under our 2017 Plan will automatically increase on January 1st of each calendar year, starting on January 1, 2018 through January 1, 2027, in an amount equal to 5.0% of the total number of shares of our capital stock outstanding on the last day of the calendar month before the date of each automatic increase, or a lesser number of shares determined by our board of directors. The maximum number of shares of our Class A common stock that may be issued on the exercise of incentive stock options under our 2017 Plan is 287,206,869.315,164,799.

Shares subject to stock awards granted under our 2017 Plan that expire or terminate without being exercised in full, or that are paid out in cash rather than in shares, do not reduce the number of shares available for issuance under our 2017 Plan. Additionally, shares become available for future grant under our 2017 Plan if they were issued under stock awards under our 2017 Plan and if we repurchase them or they are forfeited. This includes shares used to pay the exercise price of a stock award or to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to a stock award.

Corporate Transactions. Our 2017 Plan provides that in the event of certain specified significant corporate transactions, including: (1) a sale of all or substantially all of our assets, (2) the sale or disposition of more than 50% of our outstanding securities, (3) the consummation of a merger or consolidation where we do not survive the transaction, and (4) the consummation of a merger or consolidation where we do survive the transaction but the shares of our common stock outstanding before such transaction are converted or exchanged into other property by virtue of the transaction, unless otherwise provided in an award agreement or other written agreement between us and the award holder, the administrator may take one or more of the following actions with respect to such stock awards:

arrange for the assumption, continuation, or substitution of a stock award by a successor corporation;

arrange for the assumption, continuation, or substitution of a stock award by a successor corporation;

arrange for the assignment of any reacquisition or repurchase rights held by us to a successor corporation;

arrange for the assignment of any reacquisition or repurchase rights held by us to a successor corporation;

accelerate the vesting, in whole or in part, of the stock award and provide for its termination before the transaction;

accelerate the vesting, in whole or in part, of the stock award and provide for its termination before the transaction;

arrange for the lapse, in whole or in part, of any reacquisition or repurchase rights held by us;

arrange for the lapse, in whole or in part, of any reacquisition or repurchase rights held by us;

cancel or arrange for the cancellation of the stock award before the transaction in exchange for a cash payment, or no payment, as determined by the board; or


cancel or arrange for the cancellation of the stock award before the transaction in exchange for a cash payment, or no payment, as determined by the board of directors; or

make a payment, in the form determined by our board of directors, equal to the excess, if any, of the value of the property the participant would have received on exercise of the awards before the transaction over any exercise price payable by the participant in connection with the exercise.

make a payment, in the form determined by our board of directors, equal to the excess, if any, of the value of the property the participant would have received on exercise of the awards before the transaction over any exercise price payable by the participant in connection with the exercise.

The plan administrator is not obligated to treat all stock awards or portions of stock awards, even those that are of the same type, in the same manner and is not obligated to treat all participants in the same manner.

In the event of a change in control, awards granted under the 2017 Plan will not receive automatic acceleration of vesting and exercisability, although this treatment may be provided for in an award agreement. Under the 2017 Plan, a change in control is defined to includeinclude: (1) the acquisition by any person or company of more than 50% of the combined voting power of our then outstanding stock, (2) a merger, consolidation, or similar transaction in which our stockholders immediately before the transaction do not own, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the combined voting power of the surviving entity (or the parent of the surviving entity), (3) a sale, lease, exclusive license, or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets other than to an entity more than 50% of the combined voting power of which is owned by our stockholders, and (4) an unapproved change in the majority of the board of directors.


Plan Amendment or Termination. Our board of directors has the authority to amend, suspend, or terminate our 2017 Plan, provided that such action does not materially impair the existing rights of any participant without such participant’s written consent. Certain material amendments also require the approval of our stockholders. No incentive stock options may be granted after the tenth anniversary of the date our board of directors adopted our 2017 Plan. No stock awards may be granted under our 2017 Plan while it is suspended or after it is terminated.

2014 Equity Incentive Plan

Our board of directors adopted, and our stockholders approved, our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, or our 2014 Plan, in September 2014. Our 2014 Plan was amended most recently in October 2016. Our 2014 Plan allows for the grant of incentive stock options to employees, including employees of any parent or subsidiary, and for the grant of nonstatutory stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, and restricted stock units to employees, directors, and consultants, including employees and consultants of our affiliates.

Our 2017 Plan became effective on the execution of the underwriting agreement related to our initial public offering.offering in March 2017. As a result, we do not expect to grant any additional awards under the 2014 Plan following that date, other than awards for up to 2,500,000 shares of Class A common stock to our employees and consultants in France. Any awards granted under the 2014 Plan will remain subject to the terms of our 2014 Plan and applicable award agreements.

Authorized Shares. The maximum number of shares of our Class A common stock that may be issued under our 2014 Plan is 166,164,100, minus the number of shares of our Class B common stock issued after September 4, 2014 under our 2012 Plan. In addition to the share reserve, an additional 53,357,397 shares of Class A common stock are reserved under the 2014 Plan in connection with the distribution of shares of Class A Dividend, one sharecommon stock provided as a dividend to the holders of which will be issued ifall preferred stock and when a share from the share reserve is issued in connection with the settlement or exercise of acommon stock award that was outstanding as ofon October 31, 2016. The maximum number of shares of Class A common stock that may be issued on the exercise of incentive stock options under our 2014 Plan is three times such maximum number of shares. Shares subject to stock awards granted under our 2014 Plan that expire, are forfeited, or terminate without being exercised in full or are settled in cash do not reduce the number of shares available for issuance under our 2014 Plan. Additionally, shares used to pay the exercise price of a stock award or to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to a stock award become available for future grant under our 2014 Plan, although such shares may not be subsequently issued pursuant to the exercise of an incentive stock option.

Corporate Transactions. Our 2014 Plan provides that in the event of certain specified significant corporate transactions, generally including: (1) a sale of all or substantially all of our assets, (2) the sale or disposition of at least 90% of our outstanding securities, (3) the consummation of a merger or consolidation where we do not survive the transaction, and (4) the consummation of a merger or consolidation where we do survive the transaction but the shares of common stock outstanding before such transaction are converted or exchanged into other property by virtue of the transaction, unless otherwise provided in an award agreement or other written agreement between us and the award holder, the administrator may take one or more of the following actions with respect to such stock awards: (1) arrange for the assumption, continuation or substitution of a stock award by a successor corporation, (2) arrange for the assignment of any reacquisition or repurchase rights held by us to a successor corporation, (3) accelerate the vesting, in whole or in part, of the stock award and provide for


its termination before the transaction, (4) arrange for the lapse, in whole or in part, of any reacquisition or repurchase rights held by us, (5) cancel or arrange for the cancellation of the stock award before the transaction in exchange for a cash payment, if any, determined by the board of directors, or (6) make a payment, in the form determined by the board of directors, equal to the excess, if any, of the value of the property the participant would have received on exercise of the stock award before the transaction over any exercise price payable by the participant in connection with the exercise. The plan administrator is not obligated to treat all stock awards, even those that are of the same type, or all participants, in the same manner.

In the event of a change in control, awards granted under the 2014 Plan will not receive automatic acceleration of vesting and exercisability, although the board of directors may provide for this treatment in an award agreement. Under the 2014 Plan, a change in control is defined to includeinclude: (1) the acquisition by any person of more than 50% of the combined voting power of our then outstanding stock, (2) a merger, consolidation, or similar transaction in which our stockholders immediately before the transaction do not own, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the combined voting power of the surviving entity (or the parent of the surviving entity), (3) our stockholders approve or our board of directors approves a plan of complete dissolution or liquidation or a complete dissolution or liquidation otherwise occurs except for a liquidation into a parent corporation, and (4) a sale, lease, exclusive license, or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets to an entity that did not previously hold more than 50% of the voting power of our stock.


Plan Amendment or Termination. Our board of directors has the authority to amend, suspend, or terminate our 2014 Plan, although certain material amendments require the approval of our stockholders, and amendments that would impair the rights of any participant require the consent of that participant.

2012 Equity Incentive Plan

Our board of directors adopted our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, or our 2012 Plan, in May 2012, and our stockholders approved our 2012 Plan in August 2012. Our 2012 Plan was amended most recently in October 2016. Our 2012 Plan allows for the grant of incentive stock options to employees, including employees of any parent or subsidiary, and for the grant of nonstatutory stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, and restricted stock units to our employees, directors, and consultants, including employees and consultants of our affiliates.

Our 2017 Plan became effective once the registration statement in connection with our initial public offering was declared effective.effective in March 2017. As a result, we do not expect to grant any additional awards under the 2012 Plan following that date. Any awards granted under the 2012 Plan will remain subject to the terms of our 2012 Plan and applicable award agreements.

Authorized Shares. The maximum number of shares of our Class B common stock that may be issued under our 2012 Plan is 91,292,140, minus the number of shares of our Class A common stock issued after September 4, 2014 under our 2014 Plan. In addition to the share reserve, an additional 50,022,362 shares of Class A common stock are reserved under the 2012 Plan in connection with the Class A Dividend, one share of which will be issued if and when a share from the share reserve is issued in connection with the settlement or exercise of a stock award that was outstanding as of October 31, 2016. The maximum number of shares of Class B common stock that may be issued on the exercise of incentive stock options under our 2012 Plan is such maximum number of shares. Shares subject to stock awards granted under our 2012 Plan that expire, are forfeited, or terminate without being exercised in full or are settled in cash do not reduce the number of shares available for issuance under our 2012 Plan. Additionally, shares used to pay the exercise price of a stock award or to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to a stock award become available for future grant under our 2012 Plan, although such shares may not be subsequently issued pursuant to the exercise of an incentive stock option.

Corporate Transactions. Our 2012 Plan provides that in the event of certain specified significant corporate transactions, generally including: (1) a sale of all or substantially all of our assets, (2) the sale or disposition of at least 90% of our outstanding securities, (3) the consummation of a merger or consolidation where we do not survive the transaction, and (4) the consummation of a merger or consolidation where we do survive the transaction but the shares of common stock outstanding before such transaction are converted or exchanged into other property by virtue of the transaction, unless otherwise provided in an award agreement or other written agreement between us and the award holder, the administrator may take one or more of the following actions with respect to such stock awards: (1) arrange for the assumption, continuation, or substitution of a stock award by a successor corporation, (2) arrange for the assignment of any reacquisition or repurchase rights held by us to a successor corporation, (3) accelerate the vesting, in whole or in part, of the stock award and provide for its termination before the transaction, (4) arrange for the lapse, in whole or in part, of any reacquisition or repurchase rights held by us, (5) cancel or arrange for the cancellation of the stock award before the transaction in exchange


for a cash payment, if any, determined by the board of directors, or (6) make a payment, in the form determined by the board of directors, equal to the excess, if any, of the value of the property the participant would have received on exercise of the stock award before the transaction over any exercise price payable by the participant in connection with the exercise. The plan administrator is not obligated to treat all stock awards, even those that are of the same type, or all participants, in the same manner.

In the event of a change in control, awards granted under the 2012 Plan will not receive automatic acceleration of vesting and exercisability, although the board of directors may provide for this treatment in an award agreement. Under the 2012 Plan, a change in control is defined to includeinclude: (1) the acquisition by any person of more than 50% of the combined voting power of our then outstanding stock, (2) a merger, consolidation, or similar transaction in which our stockholders immediately before the transaction do not own, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the combined voting power of the surviving entity (or the parent of the surviving entity), (3) our stockholders approve or our board of directors approves a plan of complete dissolution or liquidation or a complete dissolution or liquidation otherwise occurs except for a liquidation into a parent corporation, and (4) a sale, lease, exclusive license, or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets to an entity that did not previously hold more than 50% of the voting power of our stock.

Plan Amendment or Termination. Our board of directors has the authority to amend, suspend, or terminate our 2012 Plan, although certain material amendments require the approval of our stockholders, and amendments that would impair the rights of any participant require the consent of that participant.


2017 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Our board of directors adopted our 2017 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or ESPP, in January 2017 and our stockholders approved our ESPP in February 2017. Our ESPP became effective when the registration statement in connection with our initial public offering was declared effective.effective in March 2017. The purpose of the ESPP is to secure the services of new employees, to retain the services of existing employees, and to provide incentives for such individuals to exert maximum efforts toward our success and that of our affiliates. The ESPP is intended to qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” within the meaning of Section 423 of the Code for U.S. employees. In addition, the ESPP authorizes grants of purchase rights that do not comply with Section 423 of the Code under a separate non-423 component. In particular, where such purchase rights are granted to employees who are foreign nationals or employed or located outside the United States, our board of directors may adopt rules that are beyond the scope of Section 423 of the Code.

Share Reserve. The ESPP authorizes the issuance of 16,484,690 shares of our Class A common stock under purchase rights granted to our employees or to employees of any of our designated affiliates. The number of shares of our Class A common stock reserved for issuance will automatically increase on January 1st of each calendar year, beginning on January 1, 2018 through January 1, 2027, by the lesser of (1) 1.0% of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding on the last day of the calendar month before the date of the automatic increase, and (2) 15,000,000 shares; provided that before the date of any such increase, our board of directors may determine that such increase will be less than the amount set forth in clauses (1) and (2). As of December 31, 2017,2019, no shares of our Class A common stock have been purchased under the ESPP.

Corporate Transactions. In the event of certain significant corporate transactions, including: (1) a sale of all or substantially all of our assets, (2) the sale or disposition of 90% of our outstanding securities, (3) the consummation of a merger or consolidation where we do not survive the transaction, and (4) the consummation of a merger or consolidation where we do survive the transaction but the shares of our common stock outstanding immediately before such transaction are converted or exchanged into other property by virtue of the transaction, any then-outstanding rights to purchase our stock under the ESPP may be assumed, continued, or substituted for by any surviving or acquiring entity (or its parent company). If the surviving or acquiring entity (or its parent company) elects not to assume, continue, or substitute for such purchase rights, then the participants’ accumulated payroll contributions will be used to purchase shares of our common stock within ten business days before such corporate transaction, and such purchase rights will terminate immediately.

ESPP Amendment or Termination. Our board of directors has the authority to amend or terminate our ESPP, provided that except in certain circumstances such amendment or termination may not materially impair any outstanding purchase rights without the holder’s consent. We will obtain stockholder approval of any amendment to our ESPP as required by applicable law or listing requirements.

401(k) Plan and Similar Plans

We maintain a safe harbor 401(k) plan that provides eligible U.S. employees with an opportunity to save for retirement on a tax advantaged basis. Eligible employees are able to defer eligible compensation up to certain Code limits, which are updated annually. We have the ability to make matching and discretionary contributions to the 401(k) plan. Currently, we make a match of each participant’s contribution up to a maximum of 3% of the participant’s base salary, bonus, and commissions paid during the period, and we make match of 50% of each participant’s contribution between 3% and 5% of the participant’s base salary, bonus, and commissions paid during the period. Contributions are allocated to each participant’s individual account and are then invested in selected investment alternatives according to the participants’ directions. Employees are immediately and fully vested in their own contributions and our contributions. The 401(k) plan is intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code, with the related trust intended to be tax exempt under Section 501(a) of the Code. As a tax-qualified retirement plan, contributions to the 401(k) plan are deductible by us when made, and contributions and earnings on those amounts are not taxable to the employees until withdrawn or distributed from the 401(k) plan.

Similar plans outside the United States, some of which are government mandated, cover employees of certain of our international subsidiaries. Several of these plans allow us to match, on a voluntary basis, a portion of the employee contributions.


Limitations on Liability and Indemnification Matters

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation contains provisions that limit the liability of our current and former directors for monetary damages to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Delaware law provides that directors of a corporation will not be personally liable for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for:

any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders;

any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders;

any act or omission not in good faith or that involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;

any act or omission not in good faith or that involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;

unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or redemptions; or

unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or redemptions; or

any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.

any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.

Such limitation of liability does not apply to liabilities arising under federal securities laws and does not affect the availability of equitable remedies such as injunctive relief or rescission.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes us to indemnify our directors, officers, employees, and other agents to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Our amended and restated bylaws provide that we are required to indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law and may indemnify our other employees and agents. Our amended and restated bylaws also provide that, on satisfaction of certain conditions, we will advance expenses incurred by a director or officer in advance of the final disposition of any action or proceeding, and permit us to secure insurance on behalf of any officer, director, employee, or other agent for any liability arising out of his or her actions in that capacity regardless of whether we would otherwise be permitted to indemnify him or her under the provisions of Delaware law. We have entered and expect to continue to enter into agreements to indemnify our directors, executive officers, and other employees as determined by the board of directors. With certain exceptions, these agreements provide for indemnification for related expenses including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines, and settlement amounts incurred by any of these individuals in any action or proceeding. We believe that these amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaw provisions and indemnification agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers. We also maintain customary directors’ and officers’ liability insurance.

The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against our directors for breach of their fiduciary duty. They may also reduce the likelihood of derivative litigation against our directors and officers, even though an action, if successful, might benefit us and other stockholders. Further, a stockholder’s investment may be adversely affected to the extent that we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against directors and officers as required by these indemnification provisions.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted for directors, executive officers, or persons controlling us, we have been informed that, in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.

Rule 10b5-1 Sales Plans

Our directors and officers may adopt written plans, known as Rule 10b5-1 plans, in which they will contract with a broker to buy or sell shares of our Class A common stock, Class B common stock, or Class C common stock on a periodic basis. Under a Rule 10b5-1 plan, a broker executes trades under parameters established by the director or officer when entering into the plan, without further direction from them. The director or officer may amend a Rule 10b5-1 plan in some circumstances and may terminate a plan at any time. Our directors and executive officers may also buy or sell additional shares outside of a Rule 10b5-1 plan when they do not possess of material nonpublic information, subject to compliance with the terms of our insider trading policy.


Director Compensation

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation paid toUnder our directors who are not named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. The compensation received by Mr. Spiegel as an employee of the company is presented in “Executive Compensation—Summary Compensation Table.” Except as set forth in the footnotes below, Ms. Coles, Mr. Lafley, Mr. Meresman, Mr. Miller, and Mr. Young hold RSUs that vest and are settled on the satisfaction of both (i) a service-based vesting condition and (ii) a performance condition. The performance condition was satisfied on the effective date of the registration statement for our initial public offering. The service-based vesting requirement for each of Ms. Coles, Mr. Lafley, Mr. Meresman, Mr. Miller, and Mr. Young are further described below. Except as described in the footnotes to the table below, we do not generally provide cash compensation to our non-employee directors.

Name

 

Stock Awards(1)

 

 

Other

 

 

Total

 

Michael Lynton

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Joanna Coles(2)

 

 

861,179

 

 

 

35,000

 

 

 

896,179

 

A.G. Lafley(3)

 

 

 

 

 

200,000

 

 

 

200,000

 

Mitchell Lasky

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stanley Meresman(4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scott D. Miller(5)

 

 

 

 

 

35,000

 

 

 

35,000

 

Robert Murphy(6)

 

 

 

 

 

302,247

 

 

 

302,247

 

Christopher Young(7)

 

 

 

 

 

35,000

 

 

 

35,000

 

(1)

Amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs without regard to forfeitures granted to the non-employee members of our board of directors during 2017 under our 2014 Plan, computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718. The valuation assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the RSUs is set forth in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Stock-Based Compensation.” These amounts do not reflect the actual economic value that may be realized by the director.

(2)

Ms. Coles joined our board of directors in December 2015. In connection with Ms. Coles’ service on our board of directors, we agreed to pay her a $35,000 annual cash retainer, paid on a quarterly basis after completion of each full quarter. In January 2017, we granted Ms. Coles RSUs for 52,736 shares of Class A common stock under our 2014 Plan and 35,158 of these RSUs were outstanding on December 31, 2017. This grant includes only a service-based vesting condition, which will be satisfied as follows: 16.67% of the RSUs vested on June 4, 2017, and 83.33% of the RSUs vest in equal monthly installments during the 30-month period following June 4, 2017. In the event of a change in control, the RSUs will vest in full immediately before the closing of such change in control.

(3)

Mr. Lafley joined our board of directors in July 2016. In connection with Mr. Lafley’s service on our board of directors, we agreed to pay him a $200,000 annual cash retainer to cover the costs of his travel to our meetings and events, paid on a quarterly basis after completion of each full quarter. In July 2016, we granted Mr. Lafley RSUs for 162,762 shares of Class A common stock under our 2014 Plan and 105,118 of these RSUs were outstanding on December 31, 2017. The service-based vesting condition will be satisfied in equal monthly installments over four years of service commencing on July 15, 2016. In the event of a change in control, the service-based vesting condition of the RSUs will be deemed satisfied for 100% of the RSUs that have not yet satisfied the service-based vesting requirement, immediately before the closing of such change in control.

(4)

Mr. Meresman joined our board of directors in July 2015. In July 2015, we granted Mr. Meresman RSUs for 162,762 shares of Class A common stock under our 2014 Plan and 71,210 of these RSUs were outstanding as of December 31, 2017. The service-based vesting condition will be satisfied in equal quarterly installments over four years of service commencing on July 17, 2015. In the event of a change in control, the service-based vesting condition of the RSUs will be deemed satisfied for 100% of the RSUs that have not yet satisfied the service-based vesting condition, immediately before the closing of such change in control.

(5)

Mr. Miller joined our board of directors in October 2016. In connection with Mr. Miller’s service on our board of directors, we agreed to pay him a $35,000 annual cash retainer, paid on a quarterly basis after completion of each full quarter. In October 2016, we granted Mr. Miller RSUs for 65,106 shares of Class A common stock under our 2014 Plan and 46,118 of these RSUS were outstanding as of December 31, 2017. The service-based vesting condition will be satisfied in equal monthly installments over four years of service commencing on October 26, 2016. In the event of a change in control, the service-based vesting condition of the RSUs will be deemed satisfied for 100% of the RSUs that have not yet satisfied the service-based vesting condition, immediately before the closing of such change in control.

(6)

Mr. Murphy does not receive any compensation for service as a director. Amounts reported represent (i) $250,000 for his base salary as an employee, (ii) $8,717 in 401(k) contributions made by us on behalf of Mr. Murphy, (iii) $306 for life insurance premiums paid by us on behalf of Mr. Murphy, (iv) $2,679 for membership fees for a concierge medical


service paid by us on behalf of Mr. Murphy, and (v) $40,546 in accrued vacation as of May 31, 2017, which amount was paid out as a result of our transition to a flexible vacation policy. Mr. Murphy’s salary was reduced to $1 in January 2018.

(7)

Mr. Young joined our board of directors in October 2016. In connection with Mr. Young’s service on our board of directors, we agreed to pay him a $35,000 annual cash retainer, paid on a quarterly basis after completion of each full quarter. In October 2016, we granted Mr. Young RSUs for 65,106 shares of Class A common stock under our 2014 Plan and 46,118 of these RSUS were outstanding as of December 31, 2017. The service-based vesting condition will be satisfied in equal monthly installments over four years of service commencing on October 26, 2016. In the event of a change in control, the service-based vesting condition of the RSUs will be deemed satisfied for 100% of the RSUs that have not yet satisfied the service-based vesting condition, immediately before the closing of such change in control.

Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy

The compensation committee of our board of directors is responsible for reviewing and recommending to our board of directors the compensation policy for our non-employee directors. At the recommendation of our compensation committee, our board of directors adopted a non-employee director compensation policy, under which our non-employee directors will receive an annual retainer for service on our board of directors to be effective at our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders. Anand an additional retainer will also beis provided to individuals who serve as chair of a committee or the board of directors.

We also currently reimburse our directors for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with attending board of directors and committee meetings, other than Mr. Lafley, whose travel expense retainer is described above.meetings.

Effective on our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders, ourOur non-employee director compensation policy provides that each non-employee director will receivereceives the following compensation for board of directors and committee services:

an annual retainer for board of director membership of $75,000, paid in cash;

an annual retainer for board of director membership of $75,000, paid in cash;

an annual retainer of $75,000 for chairing the board of directors, paid in cash;

an annual retainer of $75,000 for chairing the board of directors, paid in cash;

an annual retainer of $25,000 for chairing the audit committee, $20,000 for chairing the compensation committee, and $10,000 for chairing the nominating and corporate governance committee, each paid in cash; and

an annual retainer of $25,000 for chairing the audit committee, $20,000 for chairing the compensation committee, and $10,000 for chairing the nominating and corporate governance committee, each paid in cash; and

an annual grant of equity with a fair market value as of the date of grant of $250,000, comprised of 50% in RSUs vesting after one year, and 50% in stock options vesting after one year.

an annual grant of equity with a fair market value as of the date of grant of $250,000, comprised of 50% in RSUs vesting after one year, and 50% in stock options vesting after one year.


All annual cash retainers will be paid quarterly in arrears. Additionally, in the event of a change to the designated chair for a committee, the annual cash retainer for chairing such committee will be prorated based on the number of days the chair held the position. The annual grants of equity described above will beare subject to pro-rata acceleration on a director’s discontinued service on our board of directors and automatic full acceleration in the event of a change in control, as defined in the 2017 Plan.

Non-employee directors are also encouraged to accumulate stock ownership equal in value to five times the annual retainer for board of director membership within the later of five years from the effective date of the non-employee director compensation policy or each non-employee director’s initial election to serve on the board of directors. Previously owned and vested stock and shares held in trust for the benefit of the non-employee director or his or her immediate family members are counted for purposes of determining stock ownership.

Director Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation paid to our directors who are not named executive officers during the year ended December 31, 2019. The compensation received by Mr. Spiegel as an employee of our company is presented in “Executive Compensation—Summary Compensation Table.”

In 2019, we paid fees and made equity awards to our non-employee directors. We granted each non-employee director (a) RSUs for 8,937 shares of Class A common stock under our 2017 Plan and (b) options to purchase 16,802 shares of Class A common stock under our 2017 Plan. The service-based vesting condition will be fully satisfied for the RSUs and options on July 18, 2020. If a director’s service ceases before July 18, 2020, vesting of the RSUs and options will be accelerated pro rata, based on the number of months of service provided by such director. In addition, in the event of a change in control, the service-based vesting condition of the RSUs and options will be deemed satisfied for 100% of the RSUs and options that have not yet satisfied the service-based vesting condition, immediately before the closing of such change in control.

Mr. Murphy did not receive compensation for his service as a director.

Name

 

Fees Earned or Paid in Cash

 

 

Stock Awards(1)(6)

 

 

Option Awards(1)(6)

 

 

Total

 

Michael Lynton(2)

 

$

171,657

 

 

$

130,033

 

 

$

125,007

 

 

$

426,697

 

Joanna Coles

 

 

75,000

 

 

 

130,033

 

 

 

125,007

 

 

 

330,040

 

A.G. Lafley(3)

 

 

145,000

 

 

 

130,033

 

 

 

125,007

 

 

 

400,040

 

Stanley Meresman

 

100,000

 

 

130,033

 

 

125,007

 

 

355,040

 

Scott D. Miller

 

 

75,000

 

 

 

130,033

 

 

 

125,007

 

 

 

330,040

 

Robert Murphy(4)

 

 

29,929

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29,929

 

Poppy Thorpe

 

 

75,000

 

 

 

130,033

 

 

 

125,007

 

 

 

330,040

 

Christopher Young(5)

 

 

135,000

 

 

 

130,033

 

 

 

125,007

 

 

 

390,040

 

(1)

Amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs and stock options granted during 2019 under our 2017 Plan without regard to forfeitures, calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 718. These amounts do not reflect the actual economic value realized by the directors. For a discussion of the valuation of the equity awards, including the assumptions used, see Notes 1 and 4 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements.

(2)

Includes $1,657 of imputed income relating to incremental costs of family or guests accompanying Mr. Lynton on business flights that Mr. Lynton cannot reimburse under the Federal Aviation Regulations, as approved by the compensation committee of our board of directors.

(3)

Amounts reported includes a $5,000 per month retainer for Mr. Lafley’s services on a special committee.

(4)

Mr. Murphy does not receive any compensation for service as a director. Amounts reported represent (a) $1 for his base salary as an employee, (b) $5,000 in medical on-call services paid by us on behalf of Mr. Murphy, (c) $420 in a financial services program provided to executives, (d) tax “gross up” payments paid to Mr. Murphy to cover the imputed income associated with the medical on-call services and the financial services program, and (e) $21,026 for security for Mr. Murphy. Amounts not quantified above total less than $10,000 in aggregate.

(5)

Amounts reported includes a $5,000 per month retainer for Mr. Young’s services on a special committee.


(6)

As of December 31, 2019, the aggregate number of shares underlying stock awards and option awards outstanding for each of our non-employee directors was:

Name

 

Aggregate Stock

Awards

 

 

Aggregate Option Awards

 

Michael Lynton

 

 

8,937

 

 

 

36,033

 

Joanna Coles

 

 

8,937

 

 

 

36,033

 

A.G. Lafley

 

 

32,675

 

 

 

36,033

 

Stanley Meresman

 

 

8,937

 

 

 

36,033

 

Scott D. Miller

 

 

22,501

 

 

 

36,033

 

Poppy Thorpe

 

 

8,937

 

 

 

36,033

 

Christopher Young

 

 

22,501

 

 

 

36,033

 

In 2019, we also provided Mr. Lynton with an executive administrative assistant for his duties as Chairman. The executive administrative assistant would occasionally assist Mr. Lynton with incidental personal matters, the cost of which to us being financially immaterial.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the members of the compensation committee is currently, or has been at any time, one of our officers or employees. None of our executive officers currently serves, or has served during the last year, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our board of directors or compensation committee.


Pay Ratio Disclosure

As disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table, for the year ended December 31, 2019, the annual total compensation of our CEO was $1,669,810. The annual total compensation of our median employee, excluding our CEO, for the same period, using the same methodology used to calculate our CEO’s annual total compensation, was $305,733. The ratio of these amounts is 5.5 to 1. We believe such ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402 of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act.

To determine our median employee, we used the total compensation of our employees from our company records, including salary and wages (including overtime for hourly employees), bonuses, commissions, allowances and other imputed income, and grant date fair value of equity awards. We applied this measure to our global employee population as of October 1, 2019 and calculated total compensation for the 12 months prior to such date, annualizing all compensation other than equity awards for employees who did not work the full 12 months. We selected the individual who represented our median employee based on this information. For employees who were not paid in U.S. dollars, we converted their compensation to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate as of October 1, 2019.

The pay ratio above represents our reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with the SEC rules, which allow for significant flexibility in how companies identify the median employee, and each company may use a different methodology and make different assumptions particular to that company. As a result, and as explained by the SEC when it adopted the pay ratio rules, the ratio was not designed to facilitate comparisons of pay ratios among different companies, even companies within the same industry, but rather to allow stockholders to better understand our compensation practices and pay ratio disclosures.

Additional Disclosure Considerations

We are not subject to the “say-on-pay” and “say-on-frequency” provisions of the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform Act, and such sections are not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ItemItem 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersMatters.

The following table below sets forth information, as of December 31, 2019, with respect to the beneficial ownership ofof: (i) our shares as of December 31, 2017 by:

Class A common stock, Class B common stock, and Class C common stock by each named executive officer;

officer, each of our directors;

directors, and our directors and executive officers as a group; and

(ii) our Class B and Class C common stock by each person


or entity known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our Class B common stock andor Class C common stock (by number or by voting power).

Because our Class A common stock is non-voting, significant holders of our Class A common stock are exempt from the obligation to file reports under Sections 13(d), 13(g), and 16 of the Exchange Act. These provisions generally require significant stockholders to publicly report their ownership, including changes in that ownership. As a result, those stockholders and we are not obligated to disclose ownership of our Class A common stock, so there can be no assurance that you, or we, will be notified of such ownership or changes in such ownership. Furthermore, significant holders of our Class A common stock may hold our stock in nominee or “street name” with various brokers, such that we will not be able to identify their ownerships.

We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Except as indicated by the footnotes below, we believe, based on information furnished to us, that the persons and entities named in the table below have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares that they beneficially own, subject to applicable community property laws.

Applicable percentage ownership is based on 122,563,9201,160,127,014 shares of Class A common stock, 24,521,607 shares of Class B common stock, and 216,615,870231,147,476 shares of Class C common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2017.2019. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of such person, we deemed to be outstanding all shares subject to options and RSUs held by the person that are currently exercisable, or would become exercisable or would vest based on service-based vesting conditions within 60 days of December 31, 2017.2019. However, except as described above, we did not deem such shares outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each beneficial owner listed in the table below is c/o Snap Inc., 63 Market Street, Venice,2772 Donald Douglas Loop North, Santa Monica, CA 90291.90405.

 

 

 

Class B

Common

Stock

 

 

Class C

Common

Stock

 

 

% of

Total

Voting

Power

 

Name of Beneficial Owner

 

Shares

 

 

%

 

 

Shares

 

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

Directors and Named Executive Officers:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Evan Spiegel(1)

 

 

5,862,410

 

 

 

4.8

 

 

 

111,792,597

 

 

 

50.9

 

 

 

48.4

 

Robert Murphy(2)

 

 

5,862,410

 

 

 

4.8

 

 

 

107,943,924

 

 

 

49.8

 

 

 

47.4

 

Imran Khan

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

Michael O’Sullivan

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

Chris Handman(3)

 

 

702,735

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

Michael Lynton

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

Joanna Coles

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

A.G. Lafley

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

Mitchell Lasky(4)

 

 

65,799,720

 

 

 

53.7

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

2.9

 

Stanley Meresman

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

Scott D. Miller

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

Christopher Young

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

All directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons)(5)

 

 

79,006,355

 

 

 

64.5

 

 

 

250,943,036

 

 

 

100.0

 

 

 

98.3

 

5% Stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benchmark Capital Partners VII, L.P.(4)

 

 

65,799,720

 

 

 

53.7

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

2.9

 

 

 

Class A Common Stock

 

 

Class B Common Stock

 

 

Class C Common Stock

 

 

% of Total

Name of Beneficial Owner

 

Shares

 

 

%

 

 

Shares

 

 

%

 

 

Shares

 

 

%

 

 

Voting Power

Directors and Named Executive Officers:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Evan Spiegel(1)

 

 

68,162,239

 

 

 

5.9

 

%

 

5,862,410

 

 

23.9

 

%

 

126,324,204

 

 

53.9

 

%

53.6

%

Robert Murphy(2)

 

 

91,904,274

 

 

7.9

 

 

 

5,862,410

 

 

23.9

 

 

 

107,943,924

 

 

46.7

 

 

46.5

 

Derek Andersen(3)

 

 

833,057

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

Jerry Hunter(4)

 

 

819,742

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

Rebecca Morrow(5)

 

 

275,000

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

Michael O’Sullivan(6)

 

 

841,214

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

Tim Stone(7)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lara Sweet(8)

 

 

761,652

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

Michael Lynton(9)

 

 

1,708,103

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

Joanna Coles(10)

 

 

88,187

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

A.G. Lafley(11)

 

 

174,518

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

Stanley Meresman(10)

 

 

191,474

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

Scott D. Miller(12)

 

 

82,966

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

Poppy Thorpe(10)

 

 

28,712

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

Christopher Young(12)

 

 

82,966

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

All directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons)(13)

 

 

169,808,017

 

 

14.6

 

 

 

11,724,820

 

 

47.8

 

 

 

234,268,128

 

 

 

100.0

 

 

99.5

 

5% Stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Entities affiliated with Tencent Holdings Limited(14)

 

**

 

 

**

 

 

 

10,344,970

 

 

 

42.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

*

Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1%.

**

Unknown; as noted above, holders of our Class A common stock, other than our directors or officers, are exempt from the obligation to file reports under Sections 13(d), 13(g), and 16 of the Exchange Act and may hold the stock in nominee or “street name” such that we are not able to identify their ownerships. In November 2017, Tencent Holdings Limited notified us that it, together with its affiliates, acquired 145,778,246 shares of our non-voting Class A common


stock via open market purchases. Because Tencent is not obligated to disclose changes in its ownership of our Class A common stock, we cannot confirm whether it still owns such shares and there can be no assurance that you, or we, will be notified of any changes to their ownership of such shares.

(1)

ConsistsIncludes (a) 5,230,660 shares of (i)Class A common stock and 5,862,410 shares of Class B common stock held in trust for which Mr. Spiegel is trustee and holds voting power, (ii)108,671,946(b) 123,203,552 shares of Class C common stock held by Mr. Spiegel individually, and (iii) 3,120,651(c) 3,120,652 shares of Class C common stock that will be delivered to Mr. Spiegel within 60 days of December 31, 2017.2019. Mr. Spiegel holds RSUs for 34,327,1669,361,955 shares of Class C common stock that are fully vested and will be settled to shares in equal quarterly installments over three years beginning in November 2017.the next year. These shares are fully vested, but Mr. Spiegel does not have the right to vote the 34,327,1669,361,955 RSUs until they are settled to shares of Class C common stock. If such undelivered shares were included in Mr. Spiegel’s beneficial ownership (assuming no shares were withheld or sold to pay withholding taxes), at December 31, 2017,2019, Mr. Spiegel’s holdings would have represented 57.0%55.1% of the Class C common stock and 54.6%54.8% of the total voting power.

(2)

ConsistsIncludes (a) 5,862,410 shares of Class A common stock and 5,862,410 shares of Class B common stock held in trust for which Mr. Murphy is trustee and holds voting and dispositive power and (b) 107,943,924 shares of Class C common stock held by Mr. Murphy individually.

(3)

Consists of 495,735Includes (a) 656,250 shares of Class BA common stock held by Mr. Handman individually. Mr. Handman holdsthat are unvested and subject to forfeiture as of December 31, 2019 and (b) RSUs for 207,00032,435 shares of Class BA common stock for which the service-based vesting condition would be satisfied within 60 days of December 31, 2017.2019.

(4)

Consists of (i) 52,294,720Includes (a) 218,750 shares of Class BA common stock held by Benchmark Capital Partners VII, L.P. (“BCP VII”), (ii) 5,807,780that are unvested and subject to forfeiture as of December 31, 2019, but for which the service-based vesting condition would be satisfied with respect to 15,625 shares within 60 days of December 31, 2019, and (b) RSUs for 212,808 shares of Class B Common Stock held by Benchmark Founders’ Fund VII, L.P. (“BFF VII”), and (iii) 7,697,220 shares of Class B Common Stock held by Benchmark Founders’ Fund VII-B, L.P. (“BFF VII-B”). Benchmark Capital Management Co. VII, L.L.C., the general partner of BCP VII, BFF VII, and BFF VII-B, may be deemed to have sole power to vote these shares, and Matthew R. Cohler, Bruce W. Dunlevie, Peter H. Fenton, J. William Gurley, Kevin R. Harvey, Mr. Lasky, Steven M. Spurlock, and Erica Vishria, the managing members of Benchmark Capital Management Co. VII, L.L.C., may be deemed to have shared power to vote these shares. Benchmark Capital Partners VII, L.P. owns 53.7% of our outstanding Class B common stock and has 2.9% of the total voting power. The address for BCP VII, BFF VII, and BFF VII-B is 2965 Woodside Road, Woodside, CA 94062. This information is based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by BCP VII on February 5, 2018.

(5)

Consists of (i) 79,006,355 shares of Class B common stock, (ii) 216,615,870 shares of Class C common stock held by our current directors and executive officers, (iii) RSUs for 465,978 shares of Class BA common stock for which the service-based vesting condition would be satisfied within 60 days of December 31, 2017,2019 and (iv)(b) 210,000 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2019.

(5)

Consists of 275,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, all of which are unvested and subject to forfeiture as of December 31, 2019, but for which the service-based vesting condition would be satisfied with respect to 17,187 shares within 60 days of December 31, 2019.

(6)

Includes (a) 656,250 shares of Class A common stock that are unvested and subject to forfeiture as of December 31, 2019, but for which the service-based vesting condition will be satisfied with respect to 46,875 shares within 60 days of December 31, 2019, and (b) RSUs for 34,327,16679,904 shares of Class A common stock for which the service-based vesting condition would be satisfied within 60 days of December 31, 2019.

(7)

Mr. Stone served as Chief Financial Officer until January 25, 2019.

(8)

Includes (a) 656,250 shares of Class A common stock that are unvested and subject to forfeiture as of December 31, 2019, but for which the service-based vesting condition will be satisfied with respect to 46,875 shares within 60 days of December 31, 2019, and (b) RSUs for 11,062 shares of Class A common stock for which the service-based vesting condition would be satisfied within 60 days of December 31, 2019.

(9)

Includes (a) 1,620,723 shares of Class A common stock for which Mr. Lynton is trustee and (b) 19,231 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2019.

(10)

Includes 19,231 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2019

(11)

Includes (a) RSUs for 6,782 shares of Class A common stock for which the service-based vesting condition would be satisfied within 60 days of December 31, 2019 and (b) 19,231 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2019.

(12)

Includes (a) RSUs for 2,712 shares of Class A common stock for which the service-based vesting condition would be satisfied within 60 days of December 31, 2019 and (b) 19,231 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2019.


(13)

Consists of (a) 169,126,047 shares of Class A common stock (of which 6,421,377 shares are unvested and subject to forfeiture as of December 31, 2019, but for which the service-based vesting condition will be satisfied with respect to 336,077 shares within 60 days of December 31, 2019), 11,724,820 shares of Class B common stock, and 231,147,476 shares of Class C common stock held by our current directors and executive officers or for which they serve as trustees, (b) RSUs for 337,353 shares of Class A common stock for which the service-based vesting condition would be satisfied within 60 days of December 31, 2019, (c) 344,617 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2019, and (d) RSUs for 3,120,652 shares of Class C common stock that are fully vested and will be settled to shares which will be deliveredwithin 60 days of December 31, 2019. Includes shares held by Ms. Gorman and Mr. Grusd, and excludes shares held by Mr. Stone and Ms. Sweet who were not executive officers as of December 31, 2019. If all of Mr. Spiegel’s undelivered shares of Class C common stock issuable pursuant to his CEO award were included in equal quarterly installments over three years beginning in November 2017.Mr. Spiegel’s beneficial ownership (assuming no shares were withheld or sold to pay withholding taxes), at December 31, 2019, all directors and executive officers as a group would have represented 99.5% of the total voting power.

(14)

Based on our corporate and transfer agent records.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Incentive Plans

The table set forth below provides information concerning the awards that may be issued under our 2012 Plan, 2014 Plan, and 2017 Plan as of December 31, 2017:2019:

 

 

Number of Securities to

be Issued Upon Exercise

of Outstanding

Options, Warrants and

Rights(1)

 

 

Weighted-Average

Exercise Price of

Outstanding Options,

Warrants and Rights(2)

Number of Securities

Remaining Available for Issuance

Under Equity Compensation Plans

(excluding securities

reflected in column (a))

 

Plan Category

 

Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights

(a)

 

 

Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights(1)

(b)

 

 

Number of securities remaining available for issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))

(c)

 

 

(a)

 

 

(b)

(c)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(2)

 

 

195,875,617

 

 

$

4.16

 

 

$

95,735,623

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(3)

 

 

34,844,012

 

 

$

0.63

 

 

N/A

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(3)

 

 

150,877,173

 

 

$                       9.00

105,054,933

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(4)

 

 

9,361,955

 

 

$                          —

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

230,719,629

 

 

$

4.10

 

 

$

95,735,623

 

 

 

160,239,128

 

 

$                       9.00

105,054,933

 

 

(1)

Excludes RSAs subject to forfeiture that are already included within issued and outstanding Class A common stock as of December 31, 2019.

(2)

The weighted-average exercise price does not reflect that shares that will be issued in connection with the settlement of RSUs, since RSUs have no exercise price.

(2)(3)

Prior to our initial public offering, we granted awards under our 2012 Plan and our 2014 Plan. Following our initial public offering, we granted awards under our 2017 Plan, other than certain awards to our employees and consultants in France, which were granted under our 2014 Plan.

(3)(4)

Consists of (a) 34,327,1669,361,955 shares of Class C common stock issuable upon settlement of the CEO award granted to Mr. Spiegel and (b) 516,846 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of assumed options from Placed, Inc.’s 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, which options we assumed in connection with our acquisition of Placed, Inc.Spiegel.


ItemItem 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director IndependenceIndependence.

Other than compensation arrangements for our directors and executive officers, which are described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, below we describe transactions since January 1, 20172019 to which we were a party or will be a party, in which:

the amounts involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000; and

the amounts involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000; and

any of our directors, executive officers, or holders of more than 5% of our capital stock, or any member of the immediate family of, or person sharing the household with, the foregoing persons, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

any of our directors, executive officers, or holders of more than 5% of our capital stock, or any member of the immediate family of, or person sharing the household with, the foregoing persons, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.


Investor Rights Agreement

In November 2013, we entered into an amended and restated investor rights agreement, or IRA, which was amended in October 2016, with our founders and certain holders of our preferred stock, including Lynton Asset LPwhich provided the founders and entities affiliated with Benchmark Capital Partners and Lightspeed Venture Partners,those holders of preferred stock with certain registration rights, including the right to demand that we file a registration statement or request that their shares be covered by a registration statement that we are otherwise filing. Michael Lynton and Mitchell Lasky, members of our board of directors, are affiliated with Lynton Asset LP and Benchmark Capital Partners, respectively. The holders of up to an aggregate of 485,054,352389,482,874 shares of our Class A common stock (including shares issuable on conversion of Class BC common stock, andwhich are initially convertible into Class CB common stock) are entitled to rights with respect to the registration of their shares of Class B common stock or Class C common stock, respectively, under the Securities Act under this agreement.

Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP Services

We have in the past engaged the law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, or Munger, to provide certain legal services to us, and may do so in the future. Mr. Spiegel’s father, John Spiegel, is a partner at Munger, although John Spiegel has not personally provided any material legal services to us. We paidFor the year ended December 31, 2019, total services provided by Munger $14,241.63 on behalf of Mr. Spiegel for legal fees incurred by him in connection with the HSR Act filings, as described in described in “Executive Compensation—Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvement Act of 1976 Filing Fees.”were $134,888.

Our general counsel, Michael O’Sullivan, is a former attorney at Munger.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

We have in the past engaged the law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, or Gibson, to provide certain legal services to us, and may do so in the future. For the year ended December 31, 2019, total services provided by Gibson were $953,569. Mr. Spiegel’s stepmother, Debra Wong Yang, is a partner at Gibson and has provided legal services to us.

Entities Affiliated with Tencent

In the ordinary course of business, Tencent Holdings Limited and its affiliates, who hold 5% or more of our Class B common stock at December 31, 2019, purchased $770,857 of our advertising products for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Aviation Matters

In June 2018, we entered into a lease of an aircraft from an entity controlled by Mr. Spiegel on terms that are advantageous to us. Under the terms of this lease, Mr. Spiegel’s entity leases the aircraft to us for no charge. We cover all the operating, maintenance, and insurance costs, and property taxes associated with the aircraft. The lease has a one-year term, which is automatically extended for successive one-year periods unless terminated by either party. We or Mr. Spiegel’s entity may terminate the lease at any time on one year’s prior written notice. The audit and compensation committees of our board of directors approved this lease based on our overall security program for Mr. Spiegel and their assessment that such an arrangement is more efficient and flexible, and better ensures confidentiality and privacy.

Mr. Spiegel may use the aircraft leased by us for personal use pursuant to a time sharing agreement between us and Mr. Spiegel in accordance with the provisions of Federal Aviation Regulations 91.501(c). On these flights, Mr. Spiegel and guests are flown by our pilots and crew members. Mr. Spiegel reimburses us for certain costs incurred by us in connection with these flights, up to the maximum permitted under the Federal Aviation Regulations 91.501(d). When Mr. Spiegel has family or guests accompanying him on business flights, Mr. Spiegel cannot reimburse the incremental cost to us for such family or guests under the Federal Aviation Regulations. In 2019, the amount that Mr. Spiegel could not reimburse was $13,864.

Additionally, we entered into a sublease of approximately 10,000 square feet of a hangar from an entity that is controlled by Mr. Spiegel. Under the terms of this sublease, Mr. Spiegel’s entity leases the space to us for no charge. We cover the maintenance and insurance costs associated with the space. The lease has a one-year term, which is automatically extended for successive one-year periods unless terminated by either party. We use the hangar space to store and operate the aircraft.


Indemnification Agreements

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation contains provisions limiting the liability of directors, and our amended and restated bylaws provide that we will indemnify each of our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws also provide our board of directors with discretion to indemnify our employees and other agents when determined appropriate by the board. In addition, we have entered into an indemnification agreement with each of our directors and executive officers, which requires us to indemnify them.

Policies and Procedures for Transactions with Related Persons

In July 2016, we entered into a policy that our executive officers, directors, nominees for election as a director, beneficial owners of more than 5% of any class of our common stock, and any members of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons are not permitted to enter into a related person transaction with us without the approval or ratification of our board of directors or our audit committee. Any request for us to enter into a transaction with an executive officer, director, nominee for election as a director, beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of our common stock, or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons, in which the amount involved exceeds $50,000 and such person would have a direct or indirect interest, must be presented to our board of directors or our audit committee for review, consideration, and approval. In approving or rejecting any such proposal, our board of directors or our audit committee is to consider the material facts of the transaction, including whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction. During the year ended December 31, 2017, thereThere were no 2019 transactions where our policy was not followed.


Director Independence

Our board of directors has undertaken a review of the independence of each director. Based on information provided by each director concerning his or her background, employment, and affiliations, our board of directors has determined that Ms. Coles, Mr. Lafley, Mr. Lasky, Mr. Lynton, Mr. Meresman, Mr. Miller, Ms. Thorpe, and Mr. Young do not have relationships that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors is “independent” as that term is defined under the listing standards. In making these determinations, our board of directors considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with our company and all other facts and circumstances our board of directors deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our shares by each non-employee director and the transactions described above.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and ServicesServices.

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees for professional service provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, for the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016:2018:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Audit Fees(1)

 

$

6,286

 

 

$

4,862

 

 

$

8,212

 

 

$

7,764

 

Audit-Related Fees

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax Fees(2)

 

 

1,653

 

 

 

2,208

 

 

 

881

 

 

 

898

 

All Other Fees(3)

 

 

3

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

548

 

 

 

617

 

Total

 

$

7,942

 

 

$

7,072

 

 

$

9,641

 

 

$

9,279

 

 

(1)

Audit fees consist of the fees for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements, audit of our internal control over financial reporting, review of our quarterly financial statements, filing of our registration statements, including our Registration Statement on Form S-1 related to our initial public offering, accounting consultations and audits provided in connection with other statutory filings for which we have engaged Ernst & Young LLP.filings.

(2)

Tax fees consist of the fees for professional services rendered in connection with tax compliance, tax advisory, and tax planning.

(3)

All other fees consist of fees for professional services other than the services reported in audit fees, audit-related fees, and tax fees.


The audit committee has adopted a pre-approval policy under which the audit committee approves in advance all audit and permissible non-audit services to be performed by the independent accountants (subject to a de minimis exception). These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services, and other non-audit services. As part of its pre-approval policy, the audit committee considers whether the provision of any proposed non-audit services is consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence. In accordance with its pre-approval policy, the audit committee has pre-approved certain specified audit and non-audit services to be provided by our independent auditor. If there are any additional services to be provided, a request for pre-approval must be submitted to the audit committee for its consideration under the policy. The audit committee generally pre-approves particular services or categories of services on a case-by-case basis. Finally, in accordance with the pre-approval policy, the audit committee has delegated pre-approval authority to the chair of the audit committee. The chair must report any pre-approval decisions to the audit committee at its next meeting.

All of the services of Ernst & Young LLP for 20172019 and 20162018 described above were in accordance with the audit committee pre-approval policy.


PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

We have filed the following documents as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

 

1.

Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules

See Index to Financial Statements and Supplemental Data on page 63.62.

 

2.

Exhibits

The documents set forth below are filed herewith or incorporated herein by reference to the location indicated.

 

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit

Number

 

Description

 

Schedule

Form

 

File

Number

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Description

 

Schedule

Form

 

File

Number

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.1

 

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Snap Inc.

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

3.2

 

February 2, 2017

 

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Snap Inc.

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

3.2

 

February 2, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.2

 

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Snap Inc.

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

3.4

 

February 2, 2017

 

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Snap Inc.

 

10-K

 

001-38017

 

3.2

 

February 6, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.1

 

Form of Class A Common Stock Certificate

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

4.1

 

February 2, 2017

 

Form of Class A Common Stock Certificate

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

4.1

 

February 2, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.2

 

Form of Class B Common Stock Certificate

 

S-8

 

333-216495

 

4.6

 

March 7, 2017

 

Form of Class B Common Stock Certificate

 

S-8

 

333-216495

 

4.6

 

March 7, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.3

 

Form of Class C Common Stock Certificate

 

S-8

 

333-216495

 

4.7

 

March 7, 2017

 

Form of Class C Common Stock Certificate

 

S-8

 

333-216495

 

4.7

 

March 7, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.4

 

Description of Securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.5

 

Indenture, dated August 9, 2019, by and between Snap Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee

 

8-K

 

001-38017

 

4.1

 

August 9, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.6

 

Form of Global Note, representing Snap Inc.’s 0.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (included as Exhibit A to the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.5)

 

8-K

 

001-38017

 

4.2

 

August 9, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.1+

 

Snap Inc. Amended and Restated 2012 Equity Incentive Plan

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.2

 

February 2, 2017

 

Snap Inc. Amended and Restated 2012 Equity Incentive Plan

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.2

 

February 2, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.2+

 

Forms of grant notice, stock option agreement and notice of exercise under the Snap Inc. Amended and Restated 2012 Equity Incentive Plan

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.3

 

February 2, 2017

 

Forms of grant notice, stock option agreement and notice of exercise under the Snap Inc. Amended and Restated 2012 Equity Incentive Plan

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.3

 

February 2, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.3+

 

Forms of restricted stock unit grant notice and award agreement under the Snap Inc. Amended and Restated 2012 Equity Incentive Plan

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.4

 

February 2, 2017

 

Forms of restricted stock unit grant notice and award agreement under the Snap Inc. Amended and Restated 2012 Equity Incentive Plan

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.4

 

February 2, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.4+

 

Snap Inc. Amended and Restated 2014 Equity Incentive Plan

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.5

 

February 2, 2017

 

Snap Inc. Amended and Restated 2014 Equity Incentive Plan

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.5

 

February 2, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.5+

 

Forms of grant notice, stock option agreement and notice of exercise under the Snap Inc. Amended and Restated 2014 Equity Incentive Plan

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.6

 

February 2, 2017

 

Forms of grant notice, stock option agreement and notice of exercise under the Snap Inc. Amended and Restated 2014 Equity Incentive Plan

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.6

 

February 2, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.6+

 

Forms of restricted stock unit grant notice and award agreement under the Snap Inc. Amended and Restated 2014 Equity Incentive Plan

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.7

 

February 2, 2017

 

Forms of restricted stock unit grant notice and award agreement under the Snap Inc. Amended and Restated 2014 Equity Incentive Plan

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.7

 

February 2, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.7+

 

Snap Inc. 2017 Equity Incentive Plan

 

S-8

 

333-216495

 

99.7

 

March 7, 2017

 

Snap Inc. 2017 Equity Incentive Plan

 

S-8

 

333-216495

 

99.7

 

March 7, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.8+

 

Forms of grant notice, stock option agreement and notice of exercise under the Snap Inc. 2017 Equity Incentive Plan

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.9

 

February 2, 2017

 

Forms of global grant notice, stock option agreement and notice of exercise under the Snap Inc. 2017 Equity Incentive Plan

 

S-8

 

333-224591

 

10.9

 

May 1, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.9+

 

Forms of restricted stock unit grant notice and award agreement under the Snap Inc. 2017 Equity Incentive Plan

 

S-8

 

333-219899

 

10.1

 

August 10, 2017

 

Forms of restricted stock unit grant notice and award agreement under the Snap Inc. 2017 Equity Incentive Plan

 

S-8

 

333-219899

 

10.1

 

August 10, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.10+

 

Snap Inc. 2017 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.11

 

February 2, 2017

 

Forms of restricted stock award grant notice and award agreement under the Snap Inc. 2017 Equity Incentive Plan

 

10-Q

 

001-38017

 

10.4

 

October 26, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.11+

 

Form of indemnification agreement

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.12

 

February 2, 2017


 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit

Number

 

Description

 

Schedule

Form

 

File

Number

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Description

 

Schedule

Form

 

File

Number

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

10.11+

 

Snap Inc. 2017 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.11

 

February 2, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.12+

 

Amended and Restated Offer Letter, by and between Snap Inc. and Evan Spiegel, dated October 27, 2016

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.13

 

February 2, 2017

 

Form of indemnification agreement

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.12

 

February 2, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.13+

 

Amended and Restated Offer Letter, by and between Snap Inc. and Robert Murphy, dated October 27, 2016

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.14

 

February 2, 2017

 

Amended and Restated Offer Letter, by and between Snap Inc. and Evan Spiegel, dated October 27, 2016

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.13

 

February 2, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.14+

 

Amended and Restated Offer Letter, by and between Snap Inc. and Andrew Vollero, dated October 27, 2016

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.15

 

February 2, 2017

 

Amended and Restated Offer Letter, by and between Snap Inc. and Robert Murphy, dated October 27, 2016

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.14

 

February 2, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.15+

 

Amended and Restated Offer Letter, by and between Snap Inc. and Imran Khan, dated October 27, 2016

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.16

 

February 2, 2017

 

Offer Letter, by and between Snap Inc. and Michael O’Sullivan, dated July 24, 2017

 

10-Q

 

001-38017

 

10.1

 

November 8, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.16+

 

Amended and Restated Offer Letter, by and between Snap Inc. and Chris Handman, dated October 27, 2016

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.17

 

February 2, 2017

 

Amended and Restated Offer Letter, by and between Snap Inc. and Lara Sweet, dated November 6, 2017

 

10-Q

 

001-38017

 

10.7

 

November 8, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.17+

 

Amended and Restated Offer Letter, by and between Snap Inc. and Timothy Sehn, dated October 27, 2016

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.18

 

February 2, 2017

 

Amended and Restated Offer Letter, by and between Snap Inc. and Jerry Hunter, dated November 29, 2017

 

10-Q

 

001-38017

 

10.3

 

May 2, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.18+

 

Amended and Restated Offer Letter, by and between Snap Inc. and Steven Horowitz, dated October 27, 2016

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.19

 

February 2, 2017

 

Offer Letter, by and between Snap Inc. and Jared Grusd, dated October 19, 2018

 

10-K

 

001-38017

 

10.24

 

February 6, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.19+

 

Offer Letter, by and between Snap Inc. and Michael O’Sullivan, dated July 24, 2017

 

10-Q

 

001-38017

 

10.1

 

November 8, 2017

 

Offer Letter, by and between Snap Inc. and Jeremi Gorman, dated October 21, 2018

 

10-K

 

001-38017

 

10.25

 

February 6, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.20+

 

Amended and Restated Offer Letter, by and between Snap Inc. and Lara Sweet, dated November 6, 2017

 

10-Q

 

001-38017

 

10.7

 

November 8, 2017

 

Offer Letter, by and between Snap Inc. and Derek Andersen, dated May 16, 2019

 

8-K

 

001-38017

 

10.1

 

May 20, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.21+

 

Advisor Agreement, by and between Snap Inc. and Christopher T. Handman, dated July 20, 2017

 

10-Q

 

001-38017

 

10.2

 

November 8, 2017

 

Offer Letter, by and between Snap Inc. and Rebecca Morrow, dated July 12, 2019

 

10-Q

 

001-38017

 

10.1

 

October 23, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.22+

 

Option Agreement Amendment, by and between Snap Inc. and Tim Sehn, dated November 7, 2017

 

10-Q

 

001-38017

 

10.6

 

November 8, 2017

 

Snap Inc. 2020 Bonus Program

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.23#

 

Google Cloud Platform License Agreement, by and between Snap Inc. and Google Inc., dated January 30, 2017

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.20

 

February 2, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.24#

 

Amendment to Google Cloud Platform License Agreement, by and between Snap Inc., Snap Group Limited and Google Inc., dated September 18, 2017

 

10-Q

 

001-38017

 

10.3

 

November 8, 2017

10.23

 

Revolving Credit Agreement, by and among Snap Inc., Morgan Stanley Senior Funding Inc., Deutsche Bank AG Cayman Islands Branch, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Barclays Bank PLC, and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, dated July 29, 2016

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.21

 

February 2, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.25#

 

Google Cloud Platform Discount Addendum, by and between Snap Inc., Snap Group Limited and Google Inc., dated September 29, 2017

 

10-Q

 

001-38017

 

10.4

 

November 8, 2017

10.24

 

Joinder Agreement, by and among Snap Inc., Silicon Valley Bank, and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., dated February 20, 2018

 

10-K

 

001-38017

 

10.29

 

February 22, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.26#

 

Addendum No. 3 to Google Cloud Platform License Agreement, by and between Snap Inc., Snap Group Limited and Google Inc., dated November 17, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.25

 

First Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement, by and among Snap Inc., Morgan Stanley Senior Funding Inc., Deutsche Bank AG Cayman Islands Branch, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, and Silicon Valley, dated August 13, 2018

 

8-K

 

001-38017

 

10.1

 

August 13, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.26

 

Second Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement, by and among Snap Inc., the lenders party thereto, and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding Inc., as administrative agent, dated August 6, 2019

 

8-K

 

001-38017

 

10.1

 

August 9, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.27

 

Revolving Credit Agreement, by and among Snap Inc., Morgan Stanley Senior Funding Inc., Deutsche Bank AG Cayman Islands Branch, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Barclays Bank PLC, and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, dated July 29, 2016

 

S-1

 

333-215866

 

10.21

 

February 2, 2017

 

Snap Inc. Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy

 

10-K

 

001-38017

 

10.28

 

February 22, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.28

 

Snap Inc. Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.29

 

Joinder Agreement, by and among Snap Inc., Silicon Valley Bank, and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., dated February 20, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.28+

 

Form of Time Share Agreement

 

10-Q

 

001-38017

 

10.3

 

October 26, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21.1

 

List of Subsidiaries

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

List of Subsidiaries

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit

Number

 

Description

 

Schedule

Form

 

File

Number

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

  23.1

 

Consent of Ernst & Young, LLP, independent registered public accounting firm

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  31.1

 

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Snap Inc. pursuant to Rule 13a-14/Rule 15d-14(d)13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  31.2

 

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Snap Inc. pursuant to Rule 13a-1413a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  32.1*

 

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Snap Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.INS

 

Inline XBRL Instance DocumentDocument.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.SCH

 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema DocumentDocument.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.CAL

 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase DocumentDocument.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.DEF

 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase DocumentDocument.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.LAB

 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase DocumentDocument.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.PRE

 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase DocumentDocument.

104

Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

+

Indicates management contract or compensatory plan.

#

Confidential treatment has been requested for portions of this exhibit.

*

The certifications furnished in Exhibit 32.1 hereto are deemed to accompany this Annual Report on Form 10-K and will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the registrantRegistrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.

None.


SIGNATURESSIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

SNAP INC.

 

 

 

Date: February 21, 20184, 2020

/s/ Derek Andersen

 

 

/s/ Andrew VolleroDerek Andersen

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

 

 

 

Andrew VolleroDate: February 4, 2020

/s/ Rebecca Morrow

Rebecca Morrow

Chief FinancialAccounting Officer

(Principal FinancialAccounting Officer)

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Name

 

Title

 

Date

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Evan Spiegel

 

Chief Executive Officer and Director

 

February 21, 20184, 2020

Evan Spiegel

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Robert Murphy

 

Director and Chief Technology Officer

 

February 21, 20184, 2020

Robert Murphy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Andrew VolleroDerek Andersen

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

February 21, 20184, 2020

Andrew VolleroDerek Andersen

 

(Principal Financial Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Lara SweetRebecca Morrow

 

Chief Accounting Officer

 

February 21, 20184, 2020

Lara SweetRebecca Morrow

 

(Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Joanna Coles

 

Director

 

February 21, 20184, 2020

Joanna Coles

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ A.G. Lafley

 

Director

 

February 21, 20184, 2020

A.G. Lafley

/s/ Mitchell Lasky

Director

February 21, 2018

Mitchell Lasky

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Michael Lynton

 

Director

 

February 21, 20184, 2020

Michael Lynton

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Stanley Meresman

 

Director

 

February 21, 20184, 2020

Stanley Meresman

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Scott D. Miller

 

Director

 

February 21, 20184, 2020

Scott D. Miller

/s/ Poppy Thorpe

Director

February 4, 2020

Poppy Thorpe

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Christopher Young

 

Director

 

February 21, 20184, 2020

Christopher Young

 

 

 

 

 

123138