UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

Form 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the year endedDecember 31, 2017

2021

or

 ☐

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 001-38211

ROKU, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

4841

26-2087865

Delaware484126-2087865
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

(Primary standard industrial
code number)

(I.R.S. employer identification no.)

150 Winchester Circle

Los Gatos,

1155 Coleman Avenue
San Jose, California 95032

95110

(408) 556-9040
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant’s principal executive offices)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

Class A Common Stock, $0.0001 par value

ROKU

The NASDAQNasdaq Global Select Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No  

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes   No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No  

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Act:

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated Filer

Large Accelerated Filer

Accelerated Filer
Non-accelerated filer

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Emerging Growth Company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. Yes

No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes   No

The registrant was not a public company as

As of the last business day of its most recently completed second fiscal quarter and therefore, cannot calculateJune 30, 2021, the aggregate market value of its voting and non-voting common equitystock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon the closing sales price for the registrant’s common stock, as reported in the Nasdaq Global Select Market System, was $53,234,001,409. Shares of common stock beneficially owned by each executive officer and director of the Registrant and by each person known by the Registrant to beneficially own 10% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such date.

persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for any other purpose.

1


As of February 14, 2018,January 31, 2022, the registrant had 19,746,394119,086,923 shares of Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value per share and 79,823,48716,215,344 shares of Class B common stock, $0.0001 par value per share.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III incorporates by reference certain information from the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement (the “2017“2021 Proxy Statement”) for the 20182022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The 20172021 Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and exchangeExchange Commission within 120 days of the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

2021.
2


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Part I

Page

Item 1

5

11

39

39

39

39

40

43

45

65

65

98

99

99

99

99

103



2


NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended or the (“Securities Act,Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or the (“Exchange Act,Act”), about us and our industry that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this report,Annual Report, including statements regarding our future results of operations and financial condition, business strategy, and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. For example, statements in this Annual Report regarding the potential future impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business and results of operations are forward-looking statements. In some cases, forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “design,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potentially,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “will”“will,” “would,” “target,” or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions.

We caution you that the foregoing may not encompass all of the forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report.

Forward-looking statements are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to our management.available. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, including risks described in the section titled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Form 10-K,Annual Report, regarding, among other things:

our financial performance, including our revenue, cost of revenue, operating expenses, and our ability to attainmaintain and sustaingrow our profitability;

the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, supply chain disruptions, and inflationary pressures on our business, operations, and the markets and communities in which we and our advertisers, content providers, Roku TV brand partners, other device licensees, manufacturers, suppliers, retailers, and users operate;

our ability to attract and retain active accountsusers and increase hours streamed;

streaming hours;

our ability to attract and retain advertisers;

our ability to attract and retain additional TV brands and service operators to license and deploy our platform;

technology;

our ability to licenseproduce or acquire rights to distribute popular content on our platform on favorable terms, or at all, including the renewals of our existing agreements with content publishers;

changes in consumer viewing habits orand the growth of TV streaming;

the growth of our relevant markets, including the growth in advertising spend on TV streaming platforms, and our ability to successfully grow our business in those markets;

our ability to adapt to changing market conditions and technological developments, including with respect to developing integrations with our platform partners;

developments;

our ability to develop and launch new streaming devicesproducts and provide ancillary services and support;

our ability to integrate acquired businesses, products, and technologies;

our ability to compete effectively with existing competitors and new market entrants;

our ability to successfully manage domestic and international expansion;

our ability to attract and retain qualified employees and key personnel;

our ability to mitigate the risks of harm associated withaddress potential and actual security breaches and system failures;

failures involving our products, systems and operations;

our ability to maintain, protect, and enhance our intellectual property; and

our ability to stay in compliancecomply with laws and regulations that currently apply or may become applicable to our business both in the United States and internationally.

We caution you that the foregoing list may not contain all of the forward-looking statements madeinternationally, including compliance with privacy and data protection regulations in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

various U.S. and international jurisdictions.

Other sections of this reportAnnual Report may include additional factors that could harm our business and financial performance. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for our management to predict all risk factors nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ from those contained in, or implied by, any forward-looking statements.


You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. We cannot assure you that the events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or occur. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason after the date of this reportAnnual Report or to conform these statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations. You should read this Annual Report, on Form 10-K and the documents that we referencereferenced in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and have filed as exhibits to this reportAnnual Report, with the understanding that our actual future results, levels of activity, performance, and achievements may be materially different from what we expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.

3


Investors and others should note that we may announce material business and financial information to our investors using our investor relations website (ir.roku.com/investor-relations)(roku.com/investor), SECU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings, webcasts, press releases, and conference calls. We use these mediums including our website, to communicate with our membersinvestors and the general public about our company, our products and services, and other issues. It is possible that the information that we make available may be deemed to be material information. We therefore encourage investors, the media, and others interested in our company to review the information that we make availablepost on our investor relations website.


Roku, the Roku logo, and other trade names, trademarks, or service marks of Roku appearing in this report are the property of Roku. Trade names, trademarks, and service marks of other companies appearing in this report are the property of their respective holders.

PART


4


PART I

Item 1: Business

Overview

Roku, Inc. (“Roku,” “the Company,” “we,” or “us”) is the leading TV streaming platform in the United States, Mexico, and Canada by hours streamed.
We pioneered streaming to the TV. Roku connects usersWe believe that someday, all TV content and all TV advertising will be streamed. The shift of the TV ecosystem to streaming is continuing and is creating more options for consumers, content publishers, advertisers, and other industry participants. TV streaming is now mainstream and consumers are spending more time watching TV streaming services, with many ‘cutting the cord’ from legacy TV services entirely. Over the past several years, nearly every major media company has entered TV streaming and launched a streaming service. Similarly, advertisers looking to reach and engage with streaming audiences are increasingly taking advantage of the benefits inherent to the digital advertising capabilities of TV streaming platforms and are re-allocating their budgets accordingly.
Our Strategy
Our mission is to be the global TV streaming platform that connects and benefits the entire TV ecosystem of consumers, content publishers, and advertisers. Through our TV streaming platform, we are focused on connecting consumers to the entertainment they love, enablesenabling content publishers to build and monetize large audiences, and providesproviding advertisers with unique capabilities to engage consumers. We do this at scale. AsCentral to our platform is the Roku operating system (the “Roku OS”). The Roku OS is purpose built for TV and designed to run on low-cost hardware which allows us to manufacture and sell streaming players that are affordable. The Roku OS also powers Roku TV models that are manufactured and sold by our TV brand partners who license the Roku OS and leverage our smart TV hardware reference designs. Roku TV models and Roku streaming players enable consumers to access a wide selection of December 31, 2017, we had 19.3content by connecting their Roku device to our streaming platform via a home broadband network.
The features and functionality of our platform, powered by the Roku OS, enable us to address the needs of our consumers, content publishers, advertisers, Roku TV brand partners, and other partners. Consumers can discover and access a wide variety of streaming content, content publishers can reach our highly-engaged user base of over 60 million active accounts1 and during 2017utilize our users streamed 14.8 billion hours 2onbilling services and data insight tools, advertisers can serve targeted and measurable ads to the TV viewers that they want to reach, Roku TV brand partners can build market share by offering high performance smart TVs in a range of sizes and price points, and retailers can offer customers Roku’s highly-rated streaming devices online and in stores. We continue to invest significant resources to advance the Roku platform. TV streaming’s disruptive content distribution model is shifting billions of dollars of economic value. Roku is capitalizing on this large economic opportunity as a leading TV streamingOS; to provide an industry-leading platform for users,our consumers, content publishers, and advertisers.

Consumers win withadvertisers; to obtain content for our platform that attracts users, including our own original content; and to extend Roku’s advantage as the streaming decade continues.

Our Business Model
Three core areas of focus define our business model. First, we build scale by increasing our active accounts. Second, we increase engagement by growing the hours of content streamed through our platform. And third, we monetize the activities that consumers engage in through our platform. Furthermore, our business model is designed to fulfill the needs of the participants in the TV streaming—they getstreaming ecosystem: consumers, content publishers, advertisers, TV brand partners, other device licensees, and retailers.
Scale: Increasing the number of active accounts
We make access to TV streaming affordable in part by offering a lineup of stand-alone streaming players that connect to a user’s TV. To enhance our users’ experience and to provide a better audio experience, we also offer our Roku Streambars with a streaming player built in that enables the soundbar to connect to our streaming platform, Roku wireless speakers that connect to Roku TV models and Roku Streambars, and our Roku Wireless Subwoofers. Furthermore, we offer customer choice with The Roku TV Ready program, which in partnership with audio companies, we enable their audio products to work seamlessly with Roku TV models. We launch new devices and provide updates via the Roku OS periodically to ensure they offer the highest performance at an affordable price.
We also license the Roku OS to TV brand partners that manufacture and sell co-branded Roku TV models that integrate the Roku OS to enable basic TV functions and connect to our TV streaming platform. We have driven strong active account growth through our Roku TV licensing program. Using our reference designs results in relatively low hardware costs, enabling these TV brand licensees to manufacture and sell smart TVs that are competitively priced for consumers and that are automatically updated whenever we issue a Roku OS update.
5


We also license the Roku OS and our streaming player designs, as well as provide ongoing technology and support services, to certain international pay TV and telecommunications service operators that distribute co-branded players to their subscribers in their markets.
We offer consumers tremendous optionality and value with respect to gaining access to the Roku platform that is combined with an exceptional user experience more entertainment optionson the platform. We have been able to significantly scale our active account base over a multi-year period. In 2021, we added over 8.9 million active accounts, ending the year with 60.1 million active accounts.
Engagement: Growing streaming hours
We believe that offering users a wide range of content and more control over what they spendeasy-to-use user interface drives increased user engagement by delivering a better overall streaming experience. Streaming hours on content. Whenour platform have grown from 58.7 billion hours in 2020 to 73.2 billion hours in 2021, as our active accounts have grown through the distribution of Roku streaming players and our partners’ Roku TV models.
Through our streaming platform and our streaming devices, we make it easy and affordable for our users want to enjoywatch their favorite TV shows and movies, as well as listen to streaming entertainment, they start ataudio. Furthermore, we believe our platform offers users an incredible streaming experience through a user interface that is easy to use and navigate. From the Roku home screen, where we put users first by helping them find the content they want to watch. From our home screen, users can easily search, discoverfind and access over 500,000the 500,000+ free and paid movies and TV episodes, as well as live TV, news, sports, hit movies, popular shows, and more, that are available from the thousands of channels on our streaming platform. And Roku’s powerful cross-channel search capabilities make it simple for our users to find the entertainment they are looking for. Users have the optionality to align their spend to their budget by choosing content that is available on an ad-supported, subscription, or transactional basis. Our direct relationship with our users provides us with detailed insights about our users and their behavior on our platform, including certain content they search for, the channels they install, the channels they watch, and certain content that they purchase or subscribe to on our platform. Our first party data enables us to develop actionable insights such as content recommendations to improve our users’ experience.
We enable our content partners to publish streaming channels, quickly and easily, which makes us an attractive platform for content publishers to partner with as they seek to reach TV streaming, or over-the-top (“OTT”), users. Content publishers can deliver content directly to our large and relevant audiences and reach those users who no longer use or those who never used legacy TV or paid TV subscriptions. As consumers shift to TV streaming, content publishers that use our platform are able to reach these streaming audiences at scale and engage users directly.
The Roku Channel is our own streaming channel that drives user engagement on our platform by providing our users free, ad-supported access to a large library of third-party movies and shows on-demand that we directly license, live streaming linear channels, original content, and subscription video on demand (“SVOD”) content made available through Premium Subscriptions on The Roku Channel. The Roku Channel offers Premium Subscriptions from dozens of content partners, giving users the ability to browse all available content before signing up, obtain free trials for subscriptions, sign up in one-click, and enjoy simple subscription management with a single monthly bill. The Roku Channel also is intended to help content publishers drive additional viewership and maximize the value of their content on our platform. For example, we provide personalized content selection for users and integrated Roku Pay billing services into The Roku Channel to enable one-click subscriptions. The Roku Channel is available in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. In the United States, The Roku Channel features a diverse lineup of more than 80,000 free movies and TV shows, including original and exclusive content, 200+ free live linear television channels, free ad-supported entertainment for kids and family with more than 10,000 titles, and more than 50 premium subscription channels.
The Roku Channel model offers content that grows engagement, which accelerates advertising revenue, which then enables more investment in content. To further drive user engagement on our platform, in 2021, we acquired exclusive movies and TV shows for the first time, featuring titles that are exclusive to The Roku Channel. In May 2021, we launched this original exclusive content as well as live sports, music, news and more. Users can also compare the priceRoku Originals, which is original content exclusive to The Roku Channel. Our first Roku Originals consisted of content from variousthe Quibi library, which we acquired in January 2021. We have since greenlit second seasons of some of these shows and added original content that was not part of that acquisition. We also acquired the This Old House franchise in March 2021, and launched advertising-supported video on demand (“AVOD”), ad-supported linear, and Premium Subscription channels availablefor This Old House content on The Roku Channel. In 2021, we also launched the Roku Brand Studio that evolves the advertising product and enhances the streaming experience for our users. Through Roku Brand Studio, Roku helps marketers go beyond the traditional 30-second TV ad spot and offer more innovative ad experiences, such as sponsored ads in our user interface, interactive video ads, branded content series, and more. Roku Originals will continue to play an important part of The Roku Channel’s programming in 2022 and beyond with content investments in original programming planned to be commensurate with the channel’s overall growth.
6


Monetization: Growing our revenue and gross profit by monetizing user activity
We believe that running relevant display and digital ads enhances the user experience on our platform. We generate platform segment revenue by monetizing our users’ engagement on our platform through a variety of services and choose from ad-supported,capabilities, including sales of subscription and transactional video on-demand content. The Roku platform delivers a significant expansion in consumer choice. Consumers can personalize their content selection with cable TV replacement offeringsservices and other streamingcommerce transactions, brand sponsorship and promotions, billing services, that suit their budget and needs. Ad-supported channels available on the Roku platform include YouTube, CBS News, Crackle, The CW and Vice; subscription channels include HBO Now, Hulu and Netflix as well as traditional pay TV replacement services like DirecTV Now, Sling TV, Spectrum TV and Sony PlayStation Vue; and transactional channels include Amazon Video, Google Play and Vudu. Consumers are increasingly streaming ad-supported content.

Roku operates the number one TV streaming platformvideo advertising in the United States as measured by total hours streamed, according to a survey that we commissioned, conducted in the fourth quarter of 2017, by Kantar Millward Brown. Content publishers and advertisers win with Roku because our large and growingad supported channels. Each user base simplifies their access to the fragmented and complex over the top, or OTT, market and we provide them with direct to consumer engagement and monetization opportunities. We provide our content publishers with access to the most engaged OTT audience, as measured by average hours streamed, and the ability to monetize their content with advertising, subscription or transactional business models. Furthermore, as a pure play, neutral TV streaming platform, we are better able to serve content publishers compared to other platforms that have diversified business operations and competitive content offerings. Advertisers on our platform can reach our desirable OTT audience with ads thatcreates multiple revenue opportunities for Roku, whether they are more relevant, interactivepurchasing content, enjoying ad-supported content, opening the Roku home page and measurable than advertising delivered on traditional linear TV. As traditional TV audiences shrink, OTT audiences have become increasingly important to advertisers who must continue to reach large audiences. Our growth in active accounts and hours streamed has attracted more content publishers and advertisers to our TV streaming platform creatingseeing a better user experience.

While we currently generate a majoritybranded takeover of our revenue from saleshome screen, or using a Roku remote. We measure monetization of our streaming players, we generate a majority of our gross profit from our platform revenue. Our business model is to grow gross profit by increasingcalculating the number of active accounts and growing average revenue per user or ARPU(“ARPU”), which we believe represents the inherent value of our business.business model, and growth in gross profit. In 2021, ARPU (which we measure on a trailing twelve-month basis) increased from $28.76 as of December 31, 2020 to $41.03 as of December 31, 2021 and gross profit for the full year grew from $808.2 million as of December 31, 2020 to $1,408.6 million as of December 31, 2021.

Our sophisticated and leading streaming platform enables advertisers, including content publishers, brands, and agencies, to reach audiences that are no longer reachable or are increasingly unavailable through advertising on legacy TV. We define ARPU as our platform revenue during the preceding four quarters divided by the average of the number of active accounts at the end of that periodmake it easy for content publishers to distribute and the end of the prior four quarters. We grow new accountsmonetize their streaming content through three primary channels:business models: transaction video on demand (“TVOD”) that includes channels that offer a la carte movie purchases or rentals, subscription video on demand that includes subscriptions to individual video on demand channels and so-called virtual multichannel video programming distribution services, and ad-supported, which includes AVOD channels with on demand content that do not charge a subscription fee to users, as well as free ad-supported streaming TV (“FAST”), which we selldefine as free, ad-supported linear streaming players,TV. Through Roku Pay, our platform billing solution, we partnerare also able to assist content partners with billing services, including billing users for in-channel purchases like movie rentals, managing subscriptions, and customer invoices. We believe Roku Pay is a key platform capability that simplifies user subscription signups and drives purchase and retention for our content publishers.
Content publishers also have access to our media and entertainment promotional spending campaign tools to help them attract and retain viewers. Content publishers can use a variety of ad placements, including native display ads on the Roku home screen or a screen saver to drive channel downloads, promote a channel’s content, and direct traffic to their channels in order to drive subscriptions or movie and TV brands through ourshow consumption. We also derive revenue from the sale of branded channel buttons on streaming player and Roku TV licensing program,remote controls that are intended to increase incremental usage of the channel by allowing users to launch straight into the channel from the home screen. Our analytics and we have licensing relationships with service operators. The fastest growing source of new accounts comes from our licensing partner relationships which accounted for 48% of new accounts in 2017, up from 42% in 2016. We believe we have a significant opportunity to grow platform revenue and as we further monetize TV streaming hours we will increase ARPU, which was $13.78 per active user during the year ended December 31, 2017 up by 48% as compared to $9.28 per active user for the year ended December 31, 2016. Our success in growing ARPU will depend on our ability to increasingly generate platform revenue fromreporting assist content publishers with analyzing viewership trends and metrics for specific titles. Using machine learning, we also can help content publishers target new audiences that are more likely to subscribe to their services.
We offer advertisers a unique and effective set of tools to engage with our users and our platform. Advertisers are able to leverage our direct relationship with our users, as we increase the number of active accounts.

1

Active accounts represent distinct user accounts that have streamed content onwell as our platform in the last 30 days of the period.

2

Streaming hours streamed as the aggregate amount of time users streamed content on our platform in a given period.


Our Products

Advertising

Our advertising products enable advertiserscapabilities and user data and insights, to serve relevant, ads totargeted advertisements. Roku’s first-party data is a result of our direct relationship with users and measure return on investment. We collect a variety of information on the Roku streaming platform, including user registration data, as well as anonymized information like audience engagement with channelsis exclusively available in our Oneview ad platform. Advertisers on our platform use of features like search and interactions with advertisements. With Roku TVs, we havealso can measure both the ability to use automatic content recognition (ACR) and other technology to collect information about what users watch via antennae and devices connected to Roku TVs, and we collect data about the useeffectiveness of the Roku TV’s on-screen programming guide.

We gather this informationads served and then create user segments, develop look-a-like audience and predictive models, and activate segments for use in a variety of business operations including recommendations for users and analytics for content publishers and advertisers. Our platform also provides a mechanism to match and ingest third party data sets from our advertisers and data vendors who may have demographic or other attributes that would enhance our analytics, products or advertising efforts.

We continue to refine measurement capabilitiestheir return on our advertising platform. Through our own measurement tools and third parties including Nielsen, Acxiom, Oracle Data Cloud, Nielsen Catalina Solutions, Experian, Placed and Kantar Millward Brown, we provide advertisers the capability to measure audience demographics, validate ad effectiveness, and quantify sales lift from advertising on Roku.investment. We offer engagement analytics such as ad impressions served, click-through rates, and video completion rates. We also work with a wide variety of third-party measurement companies to measure the branding impact of the ads served and audience demographics, validate ad effectiveness, and quantify sales lift from advertising on our platform. Furthermore, we serve. We have also recently established relationships with third partythird-party providers that focus on transactional or point of sale data, which enables our advertisers to compare the effectiveness of Roku ads.

Our primary advertising products include:

Video ads. Our ad-supported content publishers use video ads to monetize our audiences and we also use video ads to monetize our platform. Video ads are sold as 15-second or 30-second spots inserted before a program starts or during a program break, within channels on the Roku platform where we have video inventory access. One of the ways we secure video ad insertion rights from content publishers is via our distribution deals with those publishers. In addition, many publishers also authorize us to fill their own unsold inventory. Except for a minority of video ads that are passed unmodified in a traditional linear broadcast, all video ads are selected and delivered to a user in real-time, as the user is engagingserved on our platform. Digital advertisers have raised concerns about brand safety, viewability and fraud after certain issues arose between various video ad networks and major online video distributors. OTT is an attractive alternative. On the Roku platform our video ads play full screen, are not skippable in most channels and are delivered into a curated channel list.

Interactive video ads. We offer advertisers the ability to make their TV advertising interactive with customized clickable overlays that invite viewers to engage more intimately with brands, by watching additional videos, obtaining offer details, getting a coupon code via text or finding the nearest retailer to buy a product.

Audience development promotions. We utilize a variety of ad placements, particularly native display ads, on the Roku home screen and screen saver, to promote content publishers and their services to our users. We help them to drive channel downloads and traffic to their channels, and to drive subscriptions or movie and TV show consumption. Given our strategic role as a user’s TV streaming home screen, we are increasingly able to predict a user’s likelihood of taking action in response to an ad we serve. We also sell branded channel buttons on player and TV remote controls. The branded buttons are reserved for content publishers who want to reduce friction and drive incremental usage by allowing users to launch straight into the channel.

Brand sponsorships. We support a variety oflegacy TV. Additional promotional advertising opportunities for advertisers, such as sponsored themes to take over our home screen andinclude content sponsorships to give users the opportunity to experience a free movie or show (e.g. “Family movie night brought to you by…”).and sponsored themes on our home screen. We also sell branded content rows inwithin The Roku Channel.


OneView is the ad buying platform built for TV streaming. Advertisers use OneView to set up, make changes, and measure ad campaigns entirely on their own. In a world where all TV ads will be automated and streamed, our software and machine learning provide the best way to reach a Roku TVs

user wherever they are -- Roku, TVs are manufactured and sold by our TV brand licensees, integrate our Roku Operating System, or Roku OS, and leverage our smart TV hardware reference design. Current licensee brands consist of Element, Hisense, Hitachi, Insignia, RCA, Philips, Sharp and TCL, with a ninth brand, Magnavox, joining in spring 2018. Roku TVs are available in sizes ranging from 24” to 75” at leading retailers in the United States and Canada. In 2017 we had over 150 models available to consumers in North America, up from 100 in 2016, featuring a wide range of prices as well as picture and display capabilities. Consumers are able to choose from very affordable HD and 4K UHD models to TVs with picture quality boosted by 4K, Dolby Vision HDR and local dimming. Approximately one in five smart TVs sold in the United States in 2017 were Roku TVs.

Streaming Players

We offer a line of streaming players for sale under the Roku brand in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, the Republic of Ireland and several Latin American countries, that allow users to access ourother TV streaming platform. All players rundevices, desktop, mobile, and more. Advertisers choose OneView because it is the only ad buying platform with Roku data, with ad space from The Roku Channel, and with new Roku ad experiences that go beyond the legacy TV spot.

Business Growth
Investment in Growth
We believe that our future performance will depend on the Roku OS,success of the investments in our business that we have made, and stream content via built-in Ethernet or Wi-Fi capability, depending onwill continue to make, to improve the model. Our current product line for the U.S. market includes several models at a range of manufacturers’ suggested retail prices to meet the needs of different users starting at $29.99.

Our Strategy

We are capitalizing on the large economic opportunity for a leading TV streaming platformvalue for users, content publishers, and advertisers. Our key growth strategies include:

Grow active accounts. We intend to increase user adoption of the Roku platform by continuing to improve our user experience, to increase the depth and breadth of our content offering, and to enhance our TV streaming platform. We plan to continue to attract more users with a highly compelling TV streaming value proposition that allows users to access the largest collection of channels, pay only for the channels that they want, utilize the best search and discovery tools, and navigate a simple and easy to use user interface. We also plan to increase active accounts by continuing to expand our retail presence and grow our Roku OS licensing program for TV brands and service operators. Further, we believe international expansion represents a large opportunity to grow our active accounts. We plan to continue to invest in our international strategy over time and become a global business in the long term.

Grow hours streamed. We intend to increase user engagement and hours streamed by offering more content that is easier to find and discoveradvertisers on our platform. By increasing the available content onWe must regularly update and enrich our platform to meet evolving consumer behavior and making it easily accessible, we have diversified the type of content streamed. When we launched the first Netflix player in 2008, Netflix accounteddeliver a superior experience for 100% of our streaming hours, but now with thousands of channels available in the U.S and internationally, our reliance on any particular channel partner has continued to decline.

Grow ARPU. We expect to continue to grow ARPU by growing hours streamed and our monetization capabilities. Advertising-based content is our fastest growing segment, and we are increasing the monetization of these hours by expanding our advertising capabilities both on and off the Roku platform. We intend to continue to leverage our data and analytics to deliver relevant advertising and improve the ability of our advertisers to optimize their campaigns and measure their results. We also plan to continue to expand our direct sales teams to increase the number of advertisers who use our services.

Technology

We believe that the core technology supporting the Roku OS is a critical competitive advantage and therefore we continue to make substantial investments in our research and development efforts to enhance our platform for users, content publishers, and advertisers. Further, it is important that we remain a platform for content delivery and invest to provide content publishers with best-in-class publishing tools and actionable audience insights. We have investedmust continue

7


to innovate and invest in delivering broad searchour advertising capabilities and discovery capabilities for our users in order to organizetechnology so that we attract and manage the vast amounts of content and pricing informationencourage incremental advertising spend on our platform. Our cloud-based searchAccordingly, we plan to continue investing in our business to enhance our competitive differentiation and discoveryseed future growth. In particular, these investments will include research and development initiatives to bring new features and technology to our platform; sales and marketing efforts to drive increased scale and engagement of our user base; continuing to invest in both licensed and original content to drive incremental usage of The Roku Channel; and building out our general and administrative infrastructure to support a global scale business.
Advertising Innovation
We are expanding our total addressable market to direct-to-consumer and small/medium businesses (“SMBs”) that currently spend primarily on digital and social media platforms. We are building new advertiser products for users are powered by state-of-the-art serversSMBs to access the OneView ad platform. In 2021, we announced a new tool that will allow Shopify merchants to easily build, buy, and databases that are purpose-built and support large scale audiences. We have also introduced user experience technology such as private listening and voice search for certainmeasure TV streaming devices.


For content publishers, we offer our open Channel Developer Program to create streaming channels. The Channel Developer Program is basedadvertising campaigns on our Software Development Kit, or SDK, and proprietary implementation of the Brightscript scripting language, which is optimized to provide robust performance and a consistent user experience on any device with the Roku platform. Channel Developers may also take advantage ofAlso, in 2021, we acquired Nielsen’s video automatic content recognition and dynamic ad insertion technologies. Roku can now enable TV programmers to replace legacy TV ads with targeted ads in real-time. This means marketers can improve the consumer experience by no longer running the same ad too many times to the same linear TV viewer and content owners can increase ad revenue by bringing Roku data and attribution into legacy TV advertising.

International Markets
The shift from traditional pay TV to TV streaming is a global phenomenon, as it offers consumers better choice and greater control over their entertainment. We believe that the value our feed-based Roku Direct Publisher program, which does not requirebusiness delivers to consumers, content publishers, to write a single line of code to publish a channel onadvertisers, TV brand partners, other device licensees, and retailers is as compelling in international markets as it is in the United States. Today our platform.

For advertisers,products are available in 20+ countries while the Roku Ad Framework, or RAF, technologyOS is integrated intoavailable in six countries. We are now the Roku OS. RAF provides a variety of critical and advanced advertising capabilities, including IAB VAST ad processing, interactive rich media features, demographic measurement, device IDs, user privacy controls and compatibility with all major video ad servers, SSPs and DSPs.

Our proprietary systems leverage our feature extraction, information retrieval and matching systems to provide the most relevant ads. The Roku OS also includes our core data platform that manages and analyzes billions of technical and user events and terabytes of uncompressed data that is processed through our platform each day. We use leading big data analytic technologies to identify rich insights to improve user, content publisher and advertiser value from Roku.

In early 2018, we also announced plans to work with manufacturers of smart speakers and sound bars in a whole home entertainment licensing program. The new whole home entertainment licensing program will enable OEM brands to build sound bars and smart speakers, surround sound and multi-room audio systems that use Roku software to work together as a home entertainment network. Devices in this whole home entertainment network will be able to connect wirelessly and be controlled by voice commands and a single remote. In addition, OEM brands will be able to license smart sound bar and smart speaker hardware reference designs along with the Roku OS.

Sales and Marketing

We drive growth in our#1 TV streaming platform in the United States, Mexico, and Canada by hours streamed. We continue to build our foundation for international expansion by establishing teams and offices around the world and investing in systems and processes that will support international expansion going forward. In 2021, we expanded into Germany with our player business and launched new Roku TV models in the United Kingdom, Brazil, Mexico, Chile, and Peru. In international territories, we will continue to focus on building scale first, increasing customer engagement, and ultimately driving monetization.

Sales and Marketing
We engage in a wide variety of sales and marketing activities to continuously drive active account growth, engagement, and monetization and dedicate significant resources to this area. Our sales and marketing activities are primarily focused on building and expanding relationships with content publishers, advertisers, TV brands, retailers, and service operators. operators, and driving sales of our streaming players and audio products and Roku TV models to consumers through retail distribution channels.
We have dedicated business development teams that develop and maintain relationships, to promote and build awareness of the features and advantages of Roku.the Roku platform among content publishers, advertisers, TV brands, and service operators. Our data science team supports our sales and marketing efforts by analyzing data on our platform to increase effectiveness for our content publishers and advertisers as well as for our consumer marketing campaigns. We enter into distribution agreements with our content publishers and license their content through our dedicated content relationship management team. We sell advertising with two direct sales teams, one focused on content publishers, the other focused on traditional advertisers. Our relationship with content publishers is typically client-direct. We secure direct access to publishers’ video ad inventory as part of our distribution agreements and through access to programmatic ad exchanges in OneView to serve as an additional channel for content publishers to monetize their audience. These sales efforts are differentiated and complementary to that of our content publishers. Whereas our publishers typically sell on a cross-platform basis and feature their brand and content in their sale, we focus on delivering a large OTTstreaming audience across many channels at once. once using our own data. We sell advertising to a wide range of advertisers helping them reach their goals across numerous key performance indicators. Our sales teams and products are organized into six groups that specialize in the unique needs of each area: (i) agency holding companies and Fortune 500 brands, (ii) independent agency and mid-market clients, (iii) content publishers and entertainment brands, (iv) performance and direct to consumer brands, (v) international markets, and (vi) local advertising.
We work with the major ad agencies and holding companies including Dentsu, Havas, Horizon, IPG, Publicis and WPP. We also offer smaller content publishers a self-serve platform to buy promotions, and are increasingly incorporating programmatic capabilities into our advertising sales. We work withRoku TV brandsbrand partners to assist in all phases of the development of Roku TVs,TV models, including development, planning, manufacturing, and marketing, and similarlymarketing. Similarly, we work with service operators on the planning and development of their Roku Poweredco-branded players.

We grow our users by providing consumers with low cost, widely available players and TVs and we promote them using a wide range of marketing techniques.

In the fall of 2017, we refreshed our entire product line of five different streaming players, with prices ranging from our most popular Roku Express at $29.99 to our most powerful Roku Ultra at $99.99.  Our players and TVs are available at over 16,000 retail locations in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, the Republic of Ireland and several Latin American countries. The majority of our streaming players, audio products and Roku players and TVsTV models are sold in the United States through traditional brick and mortar retailers, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart, including their online sales platforms, and online retailers such as Amazon.com. We also sell players in the United States directly throughAmazon, and to a lesser extent our website. In addition, in some cases, we sell our streaming players to service operators or channel partners who bundle such players with services that they sell to their customers. We also sell products internationally through distributors and to retailers such as Currys in the United Kingdom andretailers. Amazon, in France. In 2017 and 2016, Amazon.com, Best Buy, and Walmart each accounted for more than 10% of


our player revenue. These three retailers collectively accounted for 61%69% of our player revenue for both

8


of the years ended December 31, 20172021 and 2016. These retailers also sell products offered by our competitors.2020. We support retailers with an experienced sales management team and work closely with these retailers to assist with in-store marketing and product mix forecasting, leading usforecasting. We intend to becontinue to invest significant resources in our sales and marketing efforts.
Seasonality
We have historically seen seasonality in our business related to advertising and streaming player sales. Our revenue and gross profit are traditionally strongest in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and represent a category captainhigh percentage of the total net revenue for such fiscal year due to higher consumer purchases and increased advertising during holiday seasons. Furthermore, in many major retail locations.

preparation for the fourth quarter holiday season, we recognize significant discounts in the average selling prices of our player sales through retailers in an effort to grow our active accounts, which typically reduce our player gross margin in the fourth quarter.

Research and Development

Our research and development model relies uponon a combination of in-house staff and offshoreout-sourced design and manufacturing partners to cost-effectively improve and enhance our platform, and to develop new players, audio products, TVs, partner licenses, features, and functionality. We work closely with content publishers, advertisers, TV brands, and service operators to understand their current and future needs. We have designed a product development process that captures and integrates their feedback. In addition, we solicit user feedback in the development of new features and enhancements to the Roku platform.

We intend to continue to significantly invest in research and development to bring new devices to market and expandenhance our platform and capabilities.

Manufacturing

We outsource the manufacturing of our playersproducts to our contract manufacturer,manufacturers, using our design specifications. All of our playersproducts are manufactured by Foxconn at its facilitiesour contract manufacturers in the People’s Republic of China.China, Southeast Asia, and Brazil. Our contract with Foxconn doescontracts do not obligate them to supply playersproducts to us in any specific quantity or at any specific price. Our manufacturing partnerscontract manufacturers procure components and assemble our playersproducts to demand forecastsforecast we establish based upon historical trends and analysis from our sales, operations, and product management functions. Foxconn currently ships playersThe contract manufacturers ship our products to our third-party warehouses in California, the United Kingdom, Germany, and EnglandBrazil where theywe ship playersour products directly to retailers, wholesale distributors and to end users.

Government Regulation

Our business and our devices and platform are subject to numerous domesticU.S. federal, U.S. state, and foreign laws and regulations covering a wide variety of subject matters. These laws and regulations include general business regulations and laws, as well as regulations and laws specific to providers of Internet-deliveredinternet-delivered streaming services and internet-connected devices. New laws
For example, in both the United States and regulations in these areas may have an adverse effect on our business. The costs of compliance with these laws and regulations are high and are likely to increase inabroad, the future. If we fail to comply with these laws we may be subject to significant liabilities and other penalties.

In particular, our business is subject to foreign and domestic laws and regulations applicable to companies conducting business using the Internet. Both domestic and international jurisdictions vary widely as to how, or whether, existing laws governing areas such as personalregulatory framework for privacy and data security issues is rapidly evolving. U.S. federal and state consumer protection payment processingregulators generally exercise oversight of consumer privacy protections and the security of online services. And an increasing number of states have passed, or sales and other taxes and intellectual property applyare considering legislation to the Internet and e-commerce, and these laws are continually evolving. Moreover, the laws governing these areas, as well as those governing electronic contracts and Internet content and access restrictions, among other areas, are rapidly evolving. The laws in these areas are unsettled and future developments are unpredictable. Laws that lead to more stringent regulation of companies engaging in businesses using the Internet may have a negative impact on our business.

We are also subject to both general and e-commerce specific privacy laws and regulations that may require us to provide users with our policies on sharing information with third parties and advance notice of any changes to these policies. Related laws may govern the mannerconsumer privacy. Likewise, foreign jurisdictions in which we store or transfer sensitive information or impose obligations on us in the event of a security breach or inadvertent disclosure of such information. International jurisdictionsoperate impose different, and sometimes more stringent, consumer and privacy protections, includingcompared to the EU’s newly enacted General Data Protection Regulations. Such consumerUnited States. Consumer privacy laws are constantly changing and may become more diverse and restrictive over time, challenging our ability to fully complyincreasing the challenges and costs associated with complying with these laws in all jurisdictions. Privacy laws also may limit the ability of advertisers to fully utilize our platform, which could have a negative impact on our business.

Tax regulations in domestic and international jurisdictions where we do not currently collect state or local taxes may subject us to the obligation to collect and remit such taxes, to additional taxes or to requirements intended


to assist jurisdictions with their tax collection efforts. New legislation or regulation, the application of laws from jurisdictions whose laws do not currently apply to our business or the application of existing laws and regulations to the Internet and e-commerce generally could result in significant additional taxes on our business. Further, we could be subject to fines or other payments for any past failures to comply with these requirements. The continued growth and demand for e-commerce is likely to result in more laws and regulations that impose additional compliance burdens on e-commerce companies, and any such developments could harm our business.

In addition, the Internetinternet is a vital component of our business and also is subject to a variety of laws and regulations in jurisdictions throughout the world. We expect to relyhistorically have relied on the historical openness and accessibility of the Internetinternet to conduct our business, and government regulations that impede or fail to preservethe preservation of the open Internetinternet could harm our business. Regulators in the United States and abroad continue to evaluate policy changes that could affect the openness of the internet. To the extent regulatory agencies adopt rules thatregulators allow network operators to restrict the flow of content over the Internet,internet, such operators may seek to extract fees from us or our content publishers to deliver our traffic or may otherwise engage in blocking, throttling, or other discriminatory practices with respect to our traffic, which could adversely impact our business.

Our

Finally, our content publishers also arebusiness is subject to a wide range of government regulations that may vary by jurisdiction. Some nations highly regulate media, including TV streaming. Others have (or may consider) regulations that mandate
9


certain content quotas or local production requirements, for cultural preservation or other reasons. Because our business depends on the creation and production of content, and on the availability of third-party content, delivered over the Internet,internet, increased regulation of our content publishersTV streaming or changes in laws or regulations governing Internet retransmissioninternet transmission of third-party content could increase our expenses and adversely affect our business and the attractiveness of our platform.

Additionally, these kinds of regulations may make operating in certain jurisdictions more expensive or restrictive.

New laws and regulations, individually or in the aggregate, could increase our cost of doing business, impact our competitive position, or otherwise have an adverse effect on our business. The costs of compliance with these laws and regulations are substantial and are likely to increase in the future. Compliance with existing or future laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to internet and online services, data privacy and security, consumer protection, global trade, environmental protection, employee health and safety, and taxes, could have an adverse impact on our business in subsequent periods. If we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we may be subject to significant liabilities and other penalties as well as harm to our reputation. For additional information about government regulation applicable to our business and associated risks, see Item 1A, Risk Factors, elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Intellectual Property

Our success depends in part upon our ability to protect our core technology and intellectual property. WeTo establish and protect our proprietary rights, we rely on a combination of intellectual property rights, including patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, copyrights, trademarks, patentssecret laws, license agreements, confidentiality procedures, employee disclosure and domain names to protect our intellectual property. Our trademarks, including “Roku”invention assignment agreements, and the Roku logo and design, are an important part of our branding and the value of our business. other contractual rights.
As of December 31, 2017,2021, we owned 52had approximately 750 issued U.S. patents (of which 15 are design patents) and 10 issued European Community design patents.

The claims for which we have sought patent protection apply to both our devices and software. Our patent and patent600 pending applications generally apply to the features and functions of our Roku OS and the applications associated with our platform.

We also incorporate generally available third-party software, including open source software, in our Roku OS and our platform, pursuant to licenses with such third parties. The termination of these software licenses would require redesign of parts of the Roku OS and our platform, which could delay or impair our ability to offer our devices and platform.

We enter into confidentiality agreements with employees, consultants and business partners, and generally control access and use of our proprietary and other confidential information through the use of internal and external controls. These steps may not be adequate, however, and may not be effective to protect our intellectual property in the United States and foreign countries. We also license technology from third parties when we believe it will facilitate our product offerings or other international markets in which we do business. Third parties may infringe or misappropriate ourFor information about the intellectual property rightsrisks applicable to our business, see Item 1A, Risk Factors, elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Competition
The TV streaming industry is highly competitive and, as it continues to evolve, we will continue to face strong competition in every aspect of our business. We compete with much larger companies which have resources and brand recognition that pose significant competitive challenges. In the face of this competition, we believe our success depends on our ability to acquire users by delivering high quality streaming devices at competitive prices, partnering with Roku TV brands to bring co-branded smart TVs to market, and developing and monetizing our streaming platform with compelling content, promotional services, and advertising.
Our competitors include:
companies that offer TV streaming devices that compete with our streaming players and Roku TV models and companies that license their operating systems for integration into smart TVs and other streaming products;
TV brands that offer their own TV streaming solutions within their TVs and well as other devices such as game consoles, DVD players, Blu-ray players, and set-top boxes that leverage their own operating systems;
mobile streaming platforms that enable users to stream content on phones and tablets;
companies that produce and aggregate TV streaming content with the goal of attracting wide audiences;
companies that offer advertisers the opportunity to reach consumers on other content and advertising mediums;
companies that offer users other sources for news and entertainment, including broadcast and cable television networks, newspapers and magazines, social networks, and video games; and
companies that operate in the same locations as our offices that may be better able attract and retain top talent in engineering, research and development, sales and marketing, operations, and other organizations.
We also compete with other entertainment providers, including other TV streaming companies and content publishers, in seeking high quality content to license for our platform and for talent and programming concepts for original content projects.
As the TV streaming market continues to develop, we may become subject to additional competition as we introduce or may challenge our issued patents. If we fail to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, our competitors could offer similardevelop new products and services, which would harmas our business.

Employees

existing products and services evolve, or as other companies introduce competing products and services.

10


Human Capital Management
We believe our success depends on our culture and our ability to attract and retain our employees. As of December 31, 2017,2021, we had 817employed approximately 3,000 full-time employees of which 459 werelocated in research and development, 212 were13 countries. Only our employees in sales and marketing, and 146 were in general and administrative and operations. None of our employeesBrazil are represented by a labor union with respect to his or hertheir employment. The majority of our employees currently are working from home as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic but we expect that most employees will adopt a hybrid work schedule (consisting of both in-person work and working from home) in 2022.
Culture
We have not experienced any work stoppages and we consider our relations withwant our employees to be good.


Information about Segmentproud to work at Roku. Our entrepreneurial, execution-focused culture emphasizes recruiting talented individuals, encouraging teamwork, and Geographic Areas

The segmentexpecting our employees to perform at a high level. Across Roku, teams are expected to communicate clearly, in real time. Because our employees are trusted and geographic information required hereinencouraged to make decisions, our leadership communicates plans, milestones, and strategic context broadly, and our employees are trusted to maintain the confidentiality of such information. Our employees are encouraged to use our broad talent base for diverse points of view when making decisions.

As we grow our business, our goal is contained in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Corporate Information

We originally formed in October 2002 asensure that Roku LLC under the lawscontinues to be a great place to work and thrive. In 2021, we launched our first company-wide employee engagement survey to better understand employee sentiment regarding our strategy, culture, compensation and benefits, leadership, and other dimensions of the Stateemployee experience.

Diversity and Inclusion
We are committed to being a diverse and inclusive organization. We follow through on this commitment via our annual pay equity analysis designed to ensure we pay fairly and equitably across gender and ethnicity, year over year; hiring and management trainings that incorporate topics on mitigating unconscious bias; and diverse interview panels that limit questions to those that are legally compliant and objectively tied to applicable job openings.
Our Vice President of Delaware. On February 1, 2008,Global Talent Management and Inclusion leads a growing team that is focusing on priorities in four key areas: Inclusive Employee Experiences, Inclusive Recruiting, Inclusive Communities & Social Impact, and Inclusive Customer Advocacy.
Inclusive Employee Experiences: Our Employee Resource Group (“ERG”) Program currently supports six ERGs, which are voluntary, employee-led groups intended to foster a diverse and inclusive workplace, build internal community, encourage career growth and networking, and support social impact partnerships. We also regularly hold educational employee-led and expert-led dialogues that cover various diversity and inclusion topics, and we provide diversity and inclusion training and curriculum in the areas of bias, leading diverse teams, and sourcing diverse talent.
Inclusive Recruiting: Every member of our recruiting team is trained on how to source, engage, and recruit qualified diverse candidates. In fact, all recruiters are equipped to discuss a diverse hiring strategy with every hiring manager to ensure we continue to widen the candidate pipeline for all roles. Our University Recruiting and Intern programs weave diversity and inclusion into their strategies so that we are recruiting not only from diverse schools but also diverse clubs and programs across all schools. Our external relationships also are focused on organizations that represent diverse communities, including technical and non-technical women and ethnic minority organizations, as well as professional Veteran’s networks, to enable our hiring managers and recruiters to attend or speak at diverse conferences, share our job descriptions, and tell our employer brand story to a wider audience.
Inclusive Communities & Social Impact: We have developed social impact programs to support employees and Roku LLC was converted intoin volunteerism, charitable activities, and youth engagement.
Inclusive Customer Advocacy: As a TV streaming platform with both U.S. and international viewers, we believe our customer experiences should reflect the diversity of our customers. In 2021, we launched several “inclusion zones” on the Roku Inc.platform that highlight and celebrate diverse stories from various content providers.
Learning and Talent Development
Our Learning and Talent Development function provides our employees with the training and development needed to support our strategic priorities and growth. Our employee development programs begin with a Delaware corporation.comprehensive New Hire Onboarding experience covering our culture, business, and the resources employees need to increase their speed to productivity. In addition to mandatory training covering Anti-Harassment, Anti-Discrimination, and Privacy, we offer employees a highly encouraged suite of training offerings such as High-Performance Feedback, Effective Meetings, and Communication and Presentation Skills. Managers are provided with development on Expectations for Managers, Interviewing and Hiring, and Performance Management to support new and newly promoted leaders in managing and leading effectively. In addition, all employees have access to on-demand technical and non-technical skill development
11


through LinkedIn Learning. We completedintend to continue to review, refresh, purchase, and custom-build additional training materials to support our initial publicglobal employees’ performance and development needs.
Compensation and Benefits
Our total compensation program is designed to attract, retain, and reward talented professionals. As a result, we endeavor to pay competitive total compensation that is guided by market rates and tailored to account for the specific needs and responsibilities of a particular position as well as the unique qualifications of the individual employee. In determining each employee’s total compensation, we consider what they would be paid by another employer, what we would have to pay to replace them if they leave Roku, and the amount we would pay to retain them. Generally, we pay employees total compensation that is comprised of salary and equity awards rather than offering (the “IPO”)specific benefits or perks that might be valued differently by different employees. We do not pay cash bonuses or have performance-based equity awards because our employees are expected to work at the highest level regardless of possible bonus payouts or awards.
We recognize that our employees are most likely to thrive when they have the resources to meet their needs and the time and support to succeed in October 2017their professional and our Class A common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Global Select Market underpersonal lives. In support of this, we offer a variety of benefits and wellness offerings to employees around the symbol of “ROKU”. Our principal executive offices are located at 150 Winchester Circle, Los Gatos, California 95032, and our telephone number is (408) 556-9040. world.
Available Information
Our website address is www.roku.com. Information contained on or accessible through our website is not a part of this report and the inclusion of our website address in this report is an inactive textual reference only. Roku, the Roku logo and other trade names, trademarks or service marks of Roku appearing in this report are the property of Roku. Trade names, trademarks and service marks of other companies appearing in this report are the property of their respective holders.

Available Information

We make available, free of charge through our website, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, filed or furnished pursuant to Sections 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after they have been electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

TheSEC. Investors and others should note that we announce material financial information to our investors using our investor relations website (roku.com/investor), SEC filings, webcasts, press releases, and conference calls. We use these mediums to communicate with investors and the general public about our company, our products and services, and other issues. It is possible that the information we make available may readbedeemed to be material information. We therefore encourage investors, the media, and copy any materialsothers interested in our company to review the information we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F. Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain informationpost on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. our investor relations website.

The SEC maintains an internet site (http://www.sec.gov)(www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

Information contained on or accessible through the websites listed above is not incorporated by reference nor otherwise included in this Annual Report, and any references to these websites are intended to be inactive textual references only.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our business involves significant risks, some of which are described below. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all the other information in this Annual Report, on Form 10-K, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and the related notes. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations, revenue, and future prospects could be seriously harmed. In addition, you should consider the interrelationship and compounding effects of two or more risks occurring simultaneously. Unless otherwise indicated, references to our business being seriously harmed in these risk factors will include harm to our business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations, revenue, and future prospects. In that event, the market price of our Class A common stock could decline, and you could lose part or all of your investment.

You should not interpret our disclosure of any of the following risks to imply that such risks have not already materialized.

Risk Factors Summary
Below is a summary of the principal factors that make an investment in our Class A common stock speculative or risky:
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

We have incurred operating losses

the highly competitive nature of the TV streaming industry that is rapidly evolving;
our ability to monetize our streaming platform;
our ability to attract advertisers and advertising agencies to our demand-side advertising platform;
our ability to develop relationships with TV brands and service operators;
our ability to establish and maintain relationships with important content publishers;
popular or new content publishers not publishing their content on our streaming platform;
12


maintaining an adequate supply of quality video ad inventory on our platform and selling the available supply;
content publishers electing not to participate in platform features that we develop;
irrelevant or unengaging advertising, marketing campaigns, or other promotional advertising on our platform;
our ability to attract users to and generate revenue from The Roku Channel;
users signing up for offerings and services outside of our platform;
the evolution of our industry and the impact of many factors that are outside of our control;
our and our Roku TV brand partners’ reliance on retail sales channels to sell products;
our ability to build a strong brand and maintain customer satisfaction and loyalty;
advertiser or advertising agency delayed payment or failure to pay;
maintaining adequate customer support levels;
our ability to manage streaming device and other product introductions and transitions;
our and our Roku TV brand partners’ reliance on contract manufacturers and limited manufacturing capabilities;
our ability to forecast manufacturing requirements and manage our supply chain and inventory levels;
decreased availability or increased costs for materials and components used in the past, expect to incur operating losses in the future and may never achieve or maintain profitability.

We began operations in 2002 and for allmanufacturing of our players and Roku TV models;

our ability to obtain key components from sole source suppliers;
interoperability of our streaming devices with content publishers’ offerings, technologies, and systems;
detecting hardware errors or software bugs in our products before they are released to users;
component manufacturing, design, or other defects that render our devices permanently inoperable;
our ability to obtain necessary or desirable third-party technology licenses;
Risks Related to Operating and Growing Our Business
our history we have experienced net losses and negative cash flows from operations. As of December 31, 2017, we had an accumulated deficitoperating losses;
volatility of $283.3 million and for the year ended December 31, 2017, we experienced a net loss of $63.5 million. We expect our quarterly operating expensesresults that could cause our stock price to increase in the future as wedecline;
our ability to manage our growth;
our ability to successfully expand our operations. Ifinternational operations;
seasonality of our business and its impact on our revenue and gross profit do not grow atprofit;
attracting and retaining key personnel and managing succession;
maintaining systems that can support our growth, business arrangements, and financial rules;
our ability to successfully complete acquisitions and investments and integrate acquired businesses;
our ability to comply with the terms of our outstanding credit facility;
our ability to secure funds to meet our financial obligations and support our planned business growth;
Risks Related to Cybersecurity, Reliability, and Data Privacy
significant disruptions of information technology systems or data security incidents;
legal obligations and potential liability or reputational harm related to the protection of personal and confidential information;
disruptions in computer systems or other services that result in a greater rate thandegradation of our operating expenses, we will not be ableplatform;
changes in how network operators manage data that travel across their networks;
Risks Related to achieve and maintain profitability. We expect to incur significant lossesIntellectual Property
litigation resulting in the loss of important intellectual property rights;
failure or inability to protect or enforce our intellectual property or proprietary rights;
our use of open source software;
our agreements to indemnify certain of our partners if our technology is alleged to infringe on third parties’ intellectual property rights;
Risks Related to Macroeconomic Conditions
the current and future impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, supply chain disruptions, and inflationary pressures on our business;
natural disasters or other catastrophic events;
Legal and Regulatory Risks
enactment of or changes to government regulation or laws related to our business;
13


changes in U.S. or foreign trade policies, geopolitical conditions, and general economic conditions that impact our business;
U.S. or international rules (or the absence of rules) that permit internet access network operators to degrade users’ internet service speeds or limit internet data consumption by users;
liability for content that is distributed through or advertising that is served through our platform;
our ability to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting;
the impact of changes in accounting principles;
compliance with laws and regulations related to the payment of income taxes and collection of indirect taxes;
changes to U.S. or foreign taxation laws or regulations;
regulatory inquiries, investigations, and proceedings;
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Class A Common Stock
the dual class structure of our common stock;
volatility in the trading price of our Class A common stock;
potential dilution or a numberdecline in our stock price caused by future sales or issuance of reasons, including without limitation our capital stock or rights to purchase capital stock;
a decline in our stock prices caused by future sales by existing stockholders;
dependency on favorable securities and industry analyst reports;
the other risks and uncertainties described herein. Additionally, we may encounter unforeseen operating orsignificant legal, expenses, difficulties, complications, delaysaccounting, and other factors that may resultexpenses associated with being a publicly traded company;
the absence of dividends on our Class A or Class B common stock;
anti-takeover provisions in losses in future periods. If our expenses exceedcharter and bylaws; and
the limitations resulting from our revenue, we may never achieve or maintain profitabilityselection of the Delaware Court of Chancery and the U.S. federal district courts as the exclusive forums for substantially all disputes between us and our business may be harmed.

stockholders.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

TV streaming is highly competitive and many companies, including large technology companies, content owners and aggregators, TV brands, and service operators, are actively focusing on this industry. If we fail to differentiate ourselves and compete successfully with these companies, it will be difficult for us to attract and retain users and our business will be harmed.

TV streaming is increasinglyhighly competitive and global. Our success depends in part on attracting users to and retaining users on, and the effective monetization of, our TV streaming platform. To attract and retain users, we need to be able to respond efficiently to changes in consumer tastes and preferences and continue to increaseoffer our users access to the type and number of content offerings.they love on terms that they accept. Effective monetization requires us to continue to update the features and functionality of our streaming platform for users, content publishers, and advertisers. We also must also effectively support the most popular sources of streaming content that are available on our platform, such as Amazon Prime Video, Disney+, Discovery+, HBO Max, Hulu, Paramount+, Peacock, Netflix, Amazon.com, Inc., Hulu and YouTubeYouTube. And we must respond rapidly to actual and anticipated market trends in the U.S. TV streaming industry.

Companies

Large technology companies such as Amazon.com,Amazon, Apple, Inc. and Google Inc. offer TV streaming productsdevices that compete with our streaming players and Roku TV.players. In addition, Google licenses its Android operating system software for integration into smart TVs and service provider set-top boxes, and Amazon licenses its operating system software for integration into smart TVs and service provider set top boxes.sells Amazon-branded smart TVs. These companies have thegreater financial resources tothan we do and can subsidize the cost of their streaming devices or licensing arrangements in order to promote their other products and services, makingwhich could make it harder for us to acquire new users, retain existing users, and increase hours streamed.streaming hours. These companies could also implement standards or technology that are not compatible with our products or that provide a better streaming experience on competitive products.experience. These companies also have greater resources to promote their brands through traditional forms of advertising such as TV commercials, as well as Internet advertising or website product placement, and have greater resources than us to devote to such efforts.

we do.

In addition, many TV brands such as LG, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and VIZIO, Inc., offer their own TV streaming solutions within their TVs. Other devices, such as Microsoft’s Xbox and Sony’s PlayStation game consoles, and many DVD and Blu-ray players, also incorporate TV streaming functionality. Similarly, some service operators, such as Comcast, and Cablevision, offer TV streaming applications and devices as part of their cable service plans and can leverage their existing consumer bases, installation networks, broadband delivery networks, and name recognition to gain traction in the TV streaming market. If usersconsumers of TV streaming content prefer these alternative products to Rokuour streaming players and our partners’ Roku TVs,TV models, we may not be able to achieve our expected growth in playeractive accounts, streaming hours, revenue, gross profit or gross profit.

ARPU.

14


We also compete for streaming hours with mobile streaming applications on smartphones and tablets, and users may prefer to view streaming content on such applications. Increased use of mobile or other platforms for TV streaming could adversely impact the growth of our streaming hours, harm our competitive position, and otherwise harm our business.
We expect competition in TV streaming from the large technology companies and service operators described above, as well as new and growing companies, to increase in the future. This increased competition could result in pricing pressure, lower revenue, and gross profit or the failure of our players, Roku TV andmodels, or our platform to gain or maintain broad market acceptance. To remain competitive and maintain our position as a leading TV streaming providerplatform, we need to continuously invest in our platform, product development, marketing, service and support, and device distribution infrastructure. In addition, evolving TV standards such as 4K, HDR8K and unknown future developments may require further investments in the development of our players, Roku TV models, and our platform. We may not have sufficient resources to continue to make the investments needed to maintain our competitive position. In addition, most of our competitors have longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger customer bases and significantly greater financial, technical, sales, marketing, and other resources than us, which provide them with advantages in developing, marketing, or servicing new products and offerings. As a result, they may be able to respond more quickly to market demand, devote greater resources to the development, promotion, sales, and salesdistribution of their products or the distribution of their content, and influence market acceptance of their products better than we can. These competitors may also be able to adapt more quickly to new or emerging technologies or standards and may be able to deliver products and services at a lower cost. Increased competition could reduce our market share,sales volume, revenue, and operating margins, increase our operating costs, harm our competitive position, and otherwise harm our business.

To enhance our users’ experience, we also offer audio products, including Roku Streambars, Roku wireless speakers, and Roku wireless subwoofers. As a result, we may face additional competition from makers of TV audio speakers and soundbars, as well as makers of other TV peripheral devices. While sales of our audio products have not generated material amounts of revenue, if these products do not operate as designed or do not enhance the Roku TV or other viewing experience as we intend, our users’ overall viewing experience may be diminished, and this may impact the overall demand for Roku TV models or our other products.
Our future growth depends on the acceptance and growth of over-the-top (“OTT”) advertising and OTT advertising platforms.
We alsooperate in a highly competitive advertising industry and compete for video viewing hoursrevenue from advertising with mobileother streaming platforms (phones and tablets)services, including digital and social media platforms, as well as traditional media, such as radio, broadcast, cable and satellite TV, and satellite and internet radio. These competitors offer content and other advertising mediums that may be more attractive to advertisers than our streaming platform. These competitors are often very large and have more advertising experience and financial resources than we do, which may adversely affect our ability to compete for advertisers and may result in lower revenue and gross profit from advertising. If we are unable to increase our revenue from advertising by, among other things, continuing to improve our platform’s capabilities to further optimize and measure advertisers’ campaigns, increasing our advertising inventory, and expanding our advertising sales team and programmatic capabilities, our business and our growth prospects may be harmed. We may not be able to compete effectively or adapt to any such changes or trends, which would harm our ability to grow our advertising revenue and would harm our business.
Many advertisers continue to devote a substantial portion of their advertising budgets to traditional advertising, such as linear TV, radio, and print, and to advertising through digital and social media platforms. The future growth of our business depends on the growth of OTT advertising and on advertisers increasing their spend on advertising on our platform. Although legacy TV advertisers have shown growing interest in OTT advertising, we cannot be certain that their interest will continue to increase or that they will not revert to legacy TV advertising, especially if our users no longer stream TV or significantly reduce the amount of TV they stream as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic coming to an end, as a result of the launch of new hybrid broadcast standards (such as ATSC 3.0), or for other reasons. In addition, if we are unable to compete with digital and userssocial media platforms to win business from advertisers and agencies who have traditionally advertised on these platforms, such as direct-to-consumer and small or medium-sized businesses, our ability to grow our business may prefer to view streaming content on such devices. Increased usebe limited. If advertisers, or their agency relationships, do not perceive meaningful benefits of mobile platforms for video streamingOTT advertising, the market may develop more slowly than we expect, which could adversely impact the growthour operating results and our ability to grow our business.
Finally, there is political pressure in some countries to limit OTT advertising or impose local content requirements on OTT services. This pressure has been driven by owners of traditional broadcast television services and could pose a threat to our streaming hours, harm our competitive position and otherwise harm our business.

services.

15


We may not be successful in our efforts to further monetize our streaming platform, which may harm our business.

In addition to generating player revenue, our

Our business model depends on our ability to generate platform revenue from advertisers and content publishers and advertisers.publishers. We generate platform revenue primarily from the sale of digital advertising campaigns and on a transactional basis from new subscription purchases and content transactions that occur on our platform.distribution services. As such,


we are seeking to expand our user basethe number of active accounts and increase the number of hours that are streamed across our platform in an effort to create additional platform revenue opportunities. The total number of hours streamed, however, does not correlate with platform revenue on a period-by-period basis, because we do not monetize every hour streamed on our platform. As our user base grows and as we increase the amount of content offered and streamed across our platform, we must effectively monetize our expanding user base and streaming activity.

The total number of streaming hours, however, does not correlate with platform revenue on a period-by-period basis, primarily because we do not monetize every hour streamed or every user on our platform. Moreover, streaming hours on our platform are measured whenever a player or a Roku TV is streaming content, whether a viewer is actively watching or not. For example, if a player is connected to a TV, and the viewer turns off the TV, steps away, or falls asleep and does not stop or pause the player, then the particular streaming channel may continue to play content for a period of time determined by the streaming channel. We believe that this also occurs across a wide variety of non-Roku streaming devices and other set-top boxes. Since the first quarter of 2020, all Roku devices include a Roku OS feature that is designed to identify when content has been continuously streaming on a channel for an extended period of time without user interaction. This feature, which we refer to as “Are you still watching,” periodically prompts the user to confirm that they are still watching the selected channel and closes the channel if the user does not respond affirmatively. We believe that the implementation of this feature across the Roku platform benefits us, our users, channel partners, and advertisers. Some of our leading channel partners, including Netflix, also have similar features within their channels. This Roku OS feature supplements these channel features. This feature has not had and is not expected to have a material impact on our financial performance.

Our ability to deliver more relevant advertisements to our users and to increase our platform’s value to advertisers and content publishers depends on the collection of user engagement data, which may be restricted or prevented by a number of factors. Users may decide to opt out or restrict our ability to collect personal viewing data or to provide them with more relevant advertisements. Content publishers may also refuse to allow us to collect data regarding user engagement or refuse to implement mechanisms we request to ensure compliance with our legal obligations or technical requirements. For example, we are not able to fully utilize program level viewing data from many of our most popular channels to improve the relevancy of advertisements provided to our users. Other channels available on our platform, such as Amazon Prime Video, Apple TV+, Hulu, and YouTube, are focused on increasing user engagement and time spent within their channelchannels by allowing themusers to purchase additional content and streaming services within their channels. In addition,channels, for which we do not currently monetize content providedmay earn less revenue than activations on non-certified channels onor through our platform. If our users spend most of their time within particular channels where we have limited or no ability to place advertisements or leverage user information, or our users opt out from our ability to collect data for use in providing more relevant advertisements, then we may not be able to achieve our expected growth in platform revenue or gross profit. If we are unable to further monetize our streaming platform, our business may be harmed.

To date, the majority of the hours streamed on our platform have consisted of subscription video on demand content; however, in

In order to materially increase the monetization of our streaming platform through the sale of advertising-supported video advertising, we will need our users to stream significantly more ad-supported content. Furthermore, ourOur efforts to monetize our streaming platform through ad-supported content isare still developing and may not continue to grow as we expect. This means of monetization will require us to continue to attract advertising dollars to our streaming platform as well as deliver ad-supported content that appeals to users. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in monetizing our streaming platform through the distribution of ad-supported content.
If we are unable to attract advertisers or advertising agencies to our OneView ad platform or if we are not successful in running a demand-side advertising platform, our business may be harmed.
Through our OneView ad platform, advertisers and advertising agencies can programmatically purchase and manage their OTT, desktop and mobile advertising campaigns. OneView leverages the demand-side platform (“DSP”) developed by dataxu, which we acquired in November 2019, and integrates the reach, inventory, and capabilities of our proprietary advertising products and services. The market for programmatic OTT ad buying is an emerging market, and our current and potential advertisers and advertising agencies may not shift to programmatic ad buying from other buying methods as quickly as we expect or at all. If the market for programmatic OTT ad buying deteriorates or develops more slowly than we expect, advertisers and advertising agencies may not use OneView or we may not attract prospective advertisers or advertising agencies to OneView, and our business could be harmed. In addition, we have limited experience running a DSP, and if OneView does not have the functionality or services expected by advertisers or advertising agencies, we may not be able to attract their advertising spend to OneView, or our existing customers may not maintain or increase their spend on OneView. Moreover, our ownership of OneView may negatively impact the ability of OneView to purchase advertising on non-Roku platforms. If we fail to adapt to our rapidly changing industry or to our customers’ evolving needs, advertisers and advertising agencies will not adopt OneView, and our business may be harmed. We also may not be
16


able to compete effectively with more established DSPs or be able to adapt to changes or trends in programmatic OTT advertising, which would harm our ability to grow our advertising revenue and harm our business.
Our growth will depend in part on our ability to develop and expand our relationships with TV brand partners in the United States and international markets and, to a lesser extent, service operators.
We have developed, and intend to continue to develop and expand, relationships with TV brand partners and, to a lesser extent, service operators in both the United States and international markets. Our licensing arrangements are complex and time-consuming to negotiate and complete. Our current and potential partners include TV brands, cable and satellite companies, and telecommunication providers. We continue to invest in the growth and expansion of our Roku TV program both in the United States and international markets. Our licensing program for service operators has historically been primarily focused on international markets and has been decreasing in scale in recent years, as we have shifted the focus of our international growth to the sale of advertising-supported video.

Roku streaming players and expanding our licensing program with TV brand partners.

In the past few years, the sale of Roku TV models by our TV brand partners has materially contributed to our active account growth, to our streaming hours, and to our platform monetization efforts. This growth has primarily been in the United States; however, our Roku TV licensing program has been expanded to certain international markets. We license the Roku OS and our smart TV reference designs to certain TV brand partners to manufacture co-branded smart TVs. We do not typically receive, nor do we typically expect to receive, license revenue from these arrangements, but we expect to incur expenses in connection with these commercial agreements. The primary economic benefits that we derive from these license arrangements have been and will likely continue to be indirect, primarily from growing our active accounts, increasing streaming hours, and generating advertising-related revenue on our platform. If these arrangements do not continue to result in increased active accounts and streaming hours, and if that growth does not in turn lead to successfully monetizing that increased user activity, our business may be harmed.
The loss of a relationship with a TV brand partner or service operator could harm our results of operations, damage our reputation, increase pricing and promotional pressures from other partners and distribution channels, or increase our marketing costs. If we are not successful in maintaining existing and creating new relationships with any of these third parties, or if we encounter technological, content licensing, or other impediments to our development of these relationships, our ability to grow our business could be adversely impacted.
Under these license arrangements, we generally have limited control over the amount and timing of resources these entities dedicate to the relationship. In the past, our TV brand partners have failed to meet their forecasts for distributing licensed streaming devices, and they may fail to meet their forecasts in the future. If our TV brand or service operator partners fail to meet their forecasts for distributing licensed streaming devices or chose to deploy competing streaming solutions within their product lines, our business may be harmed.
We depend on a small number of content publishers for a majority of our streaming hours, and if we fail to maintain these relationships, our business could be harmed, even though the revenues received, directly or indirectly, from streaming on certain of these channels has not been significant to our overall revenue.

harmed.

Historically, a small number of content publishers have accounted for a significant portion of the contenthours streamed acrosson our platform and the terms and conditions of our relationships with content publishers vary. Forplatform. In the year ended December 31, 2017, content streamed from our2021, the top fivethree streaming channels accounted for a significant portion of the total hours of content streamed across our platform, with Netflix alone accounting for approximately one-thirdservices represented over 50% of all hours streamed in eachthe period. However, although Netflix isIf, for any reason, we cease distributing channels that have historically streamed a large percentage of the largest provider of content acrossaggregate streaming hours on our platform, revenue generated from Netflix was not material to our overall revenue during the year ended December 31, 2017,streaming hours, active accounts, or streaming device sales may be adversely affected, and weour business may be harmed.
If popular or new content publishers do not expect revenue from Netflixpublish content on our platform, we may fail to retain existing users and attract new users.
We must continuously maintain existing relationships and identify and establish new relationships with content publishers to provide popular streaming channels and popular content. In order to remain competitive, we must consistently meet user demand for popular streaming channels and content, particularly as we launch new players, introduce new Roku TV models, or enter new markets, including international markets. If we are not successful in helping our content publishers launch and maintain streaming channels that attract and retain a significant number of users on our streaming platform or if we are not able to do so in a cost-effective manner, our business will be materialharmed. Our ability to successfully help content publishers maintain and expand their channel offerings on a cost-effective basis largely depends on our operating results for the foreseeable future. ability to:
effectively promote and market new and existing streaming channels;
minimize launch delays of new and updated streaming channels; and
minimize streaming platform downtime and other technical difficulties.
17


In addition, if service operators, including pay TV providers, refuse to grant our users access to stream certain channels or only make content available on devices they prefer, our ability to offer a broad selection of popular streaming channels or content may be limited. If we fail to help our content publishers maintain and expand their audiences on the Roku platform or their channels are not available on our platform, our business may be harmed.
Most of our agreements with content publishers are not long term and can be terminated by the content publishers under certain circumstances. Any disruption in the renewal of such agreements may result in the removal of certain channels from our streaming platform and may harm our active account growth and engagement.
We enter into agreements with all our content publishers, which have varying terms and conditions, including expiration dates. Our agreements with content publishers generally have a termterms of one to three years and can be terminated before the end of the term by the content publisher under certain circumstances, such as if we materially breach the agreement, become insolvent, enter bankruptcy, commit fraud, or fail to adhere to the content publisher’spublishers’ security or other platform certification requirements. Further,Upon expiration of these agreements, we do not receive material revenueare required to re-negotiate and renew them in order to continue providing content from YouTube, the most viewed ad-supported channel by hours streamedthese content publishers on our streaming platform. We have in the past been unable, and in the future may not be able, to reach a satisfactory agreement with certain content publishers before our existing agreements have expired. If we are unable to renew such agreements on a timely basis on mutually agreeable terms, we may be required to temporarily or permanently remove certain channels from our streaming platform.
The loss of such channels from our streaming platform for year ended December 31, 2017. Ifany period of time may harm our business. More broadly, if we fail to maintain our relationships with the content publishers that account for a significant amount of the content streamed by our userson terms favorable to us, or at all, or if these content publishers face problems in delivering their content across our platform, we may lose channel partners or users and our business may be harmed.

We operate in an evolving industry, which makes it difficult to evaluate our business and prospects. If TV streaming develops more slowly than we expect, our operating results and growth prospects could be harmed. In addition, our future growth depends on the growth of TV streaming advertising.

TV streaming is relatively new and rapidly evolving industry, making our business and prospects difficult to evaluate. The growth and profitability of this industry and the level of demand and market acceptance for our products and TV platform are subject to a high degree of uncertainty. We believe that the continued growth of streaming as an entertainment alternative will depend on the availability and growth of cost-effective broadband Internet access, the quality of broadband content delivery, the quality and reliability of new devices and technology, the cost for users relative to other sources of content, as well as the quality and breadth of content that is delivered across streaming platforms. These technologies, products and content offerings continue to emerge and evolve. Users, content publishers or advertisers may find TV streaming platforms to be less attractive than traditional TV, which would harm our business. In addition, many advertisers continue to devote a substantial portion of their


advertising budgets to traditional advertising, such as TV, radio and print. The future growth of our business depends on the growth of TV streaming advertising, and on advertisers increasing spend on such advertising. We cannot be certain that they will do so. If advertisers do not perceive meaningful benefits of TV streaming advertising, then this market may develop more slowly than we expect, which could adversely impact our operating results and our ability to grow our business.

If we are unable to maintain an adequate supply of quality video ad inventory on our platform or effectively sell our available video ad inventory, our business may be harmed.

We may fail to attract content publishers that generate sufficient quantity or quality of ad-supported content hours on our platform and continue to grow supply of quality video ad inventory.

Our business model depends on our ability to grow video ad inventory on our streaming platform and sell it to advertisers. We growWhile The Roku Channel has historically served as a valuable source of video ad inventory by addingfor us to sell, there is no guarantee that it will continue to do so in the future. If The Roku Channel is unable to secure content that is appealing to our users and retainingadvertisers, or is unable to do so on terms that provide a sufficient supply of ad inventory at reasonable cost, our supply of video ad inventory will be negatively impacted. We are also dependent on our ability to monetize video ad inventory within other ad-supported channels on our streaming platform. We seek to obtain the ability to sell such inventory from the content publishers of such channels. We may fail to attract content publishers that generate a sufficient quantity or quality of ad-supported content hours on our streaming platform or fail to obtain access to a sufficient quantity and quality of ad inventory from the publishers of such content. Our access to video ad inventory in ad-supported streaming channels on our platform with ad-supported channels that we can monetize. In addition,varies greatly among channels. Accordingly, we do not have access to alla significant portion of the video ad inventory on our platform,platform. For certain channels, including YouTube’s ad-supported channel, we have no access to video ad inventory at this time, and we may not secure access in the future. The amount, quality, and cost of video ad inventory available to us can change at any time. If we are unable to grow and maintain a sufficient supply of quality video advertisingad inventory at reasonable costs to keep up with demand, our business may be harmed.

We operate in a highly competitive industry and we compete for advertising revenue with other Internet streaming platforms and services, as well as traditional media, such as radio, broadcast, cable and satellite TV and satellite and Internet radio. These competitors offer content and other advertising mediums that may be more attractive to advertisers than our TV streaming platform. These competitors are often very large and have more advertising experience and financial resources than we do, which may adversely affect our ability to compete for advertisers and may result in lower revenue and gross profit from advertising. If we are unable to increase our advertising revenue by, among other things, continuing to improve our platform’s data capabilities to further optimize and measure advertisers’ campaigns, increase our advertising inventory and expand our advertising sales team and programmatic capabilities, our business and our growth prospects may be harmed. We may not be able to compete effectively or adapt to any such changes or trends, which would harm our ability to grow our advertising revenue and harm our business.

Our players and Roku TVs must operate with various offerings, technologies and systems from our content publishers that we do not control. If Roku devices do not operate effectively with those offerings, technologies and systems, our business may be harmed.

Our Roku OS is designed for performance using relatively low cost hardware, which enables us to drive user growth with our players and Roku TVs offered at a low cost to consumers. However, our hardware must be interoperable with all channels and other offerings, technologies and systems from our content publishers, including virtual multi-channel video programming distributors such as Sling TV. We have no control over these offerings, technologies and systems beyond our channel certification requirements, and if our players do not provide our users with a high quality experience on those offerings on a cost-effective basis or if changes are made to those offerings that are not compatible with our players, we may be unable to increase user growth and content hours streamed, we may be required to increase our hardware costs and our business will be harmed. We plan to continue to introduce new products regularly and we have experienced that it takes time to optimize such products to function well with these offerings, technologies and systems. In addition, many of our largest content publishers have the right to test and certify our new products before we can publish their channels on new products. These certification processes can be time consuming and introduce third party dependencies into our product release cycles. If content publishers do not certify new products on a timely basis, or require us to make changes in order to obtain certifications, our product release plans may be adversely impacted. To continue to grow our active accounts and user engagement, we will need to prioritize development of our products to work better with new offerings, technologies and systems. If we are unable to maintain consistent operability of Roku devices that is on parity with or better than other platforms, our business could be harmed. In addition, any future changes to offerings, technologies and systems from our content publishers such as virtual service operators may impact the accessibility, speed, functionality, and other performance aspects of our products, which issues are likely to occur in the future from time to time. We may not successfully develop products that operate effectively with these offerings, technologies or systems. If it becomes more difficult for our users to access and use these offerings, technologies or systems, our business could be harmed.


Changes in consumer viewing habits could harm our business.

The manner in which consumers access streaming content is changing rapidly. As the technological infrastructure for Internet access continues to improve and evolve, consumers will be presented with more opportunities to access video, music and games on-demand with interactive capabilities. Time spent on mobile devices is growing rapidly, in particular by young adults streaming video content, including popular streaming channels like Netflix and YouTube, as well as content from cable or satellite providers available live or on-demand on mobile devices. In addition, personal computers, smart TVs, DVD players, Blu-ray players, gaming consoles and cable set top boxes allow users to access streaming entertainment content. If other streaming or technology providers are able to respond and take advantage of changes in consumer viewing habits and technologies better than us, our business could be harmed.

New entrants may enter the TV streaming market with unique service offerings or approaches to providing video. In addition, our competitors may enter into business combinations or alliances that strengthen their competitive positions. If new technologies render the TV streaming market obsolete or we are unable to successfully compete with current and new competitors and technologies, our business will be harmed, and we may not be able to increase or maintain our market share and revenue.

If we fail to obtain or maintain popular content, we may fail to retain existing users and attract new users.

We have invested a significant amount of time to cultivate relationships with our content publishers; however, such relationships may not continue to grow or yield further financial results. We must continuously maintain existing relationships and identify and establish new relationships with content publishers to provide popular content. In order to remain competitive, we must consistently meet user demand for popular streaming channels and content; particularly as we launch new players or enter new markets, including international markets. If we are not successful in helping our content publishers launch and maintain streaming channels that attract and retain a significant number of users on our platform or if we are not able to do so in a cost-effective manner, our business will be harmed. Our ability to successfully help content publishers maintain and expand their channel offerings on a cost-effective basis largely depends on our ability to:

effectively market new streaming channels and enhancements to our existing streaming channels;

minimize launch delays of new and updated streaming channels; and

minimize platform downtime and other technical difficulties.

If we fail to help our content publishers maintain and expand their channel offerings our business may be harmed.

If the advertisements on our platform are not relevant or not engaging to our users, our growth in active accounts and hours streamed may be adversely impacted.

We have made, and are continuing to make, investments to enable advertisers to deliver relevant advertising content to users on our platform. Existing and prospective Roku advertisers may not be successful in serving ads that lead to and maintain user engagement. Those ads may seem irrelevant, repetitive or overly targeted and intrusive. We are continuously seeking to balance the objectives of our users and advertisers with our desire to provide an optimal user experience, but we may not be successful in achieving a balance that continues to attract and retain users and advertisers. If we do not introduce relevant advertisements or such advertisements are overly intrusive and impede the use of our TV streaming platform, our users may stop using our platform which will harm our business.


The Roku Channel may not generate sufficient advertising revenues.

In September 2017, we launched “The Roku Channel,” an ad-supported streaming channel on the Roku platform that gives our users free access to a collection of films and other content, and this channel has become a top 20 channel on our platform by hours streamed. We will not receive subscriptions or other fees from users that access content on The Roku Channel. We have incurred, and will continue to incur, costs and expenses in connection with the launch and operation of The Roku Channel, which we plan to monetize through advertising. If our users do not continue to stream the content we make available on The Roku Channel, we will not have the opportunity to monetize The Roku Channel through advertising. Furthermore, if the advertisements on The Roku Channel are not relevant to our users or such advertisements are overly intrusive and impede our users’ enjoyment of the content we make available, our users may not stream content and view advertisements on The Roku Channel, and The Roku Channel may not generate sufficient advertising revenues to be cost effective for us to operate.

Our growth will depend in part upon our ability to develop relationships with TV brands and, to a lesser extent, service operators.

We developed, and intend to continue to develop, relationships with TV brands and service operators in both the United States and international markets. Our licensing arrangements are complex and time-consuming to negotiate and complete. Our potential partners include TV brands, cable and satellite companies and telecommunication providers. Under these license arrangements, we generally have limited control over the amount and timing of resources these entities dedicate to the relationship. If our TV brand or service operator partners fail to meet their forecasts for distributing licensed devices, our business may be harmed.

We license our Roku OS to certain TV brands to manufacture co-branded smart TVs, or Roku TVs. The primary economic benefits that we derive from these license arrangements have been and will likely continue to be indirect, primarily from growing our active accounts and increasing hours streamed. We have not received, nor do we expect to receive significant license revenue from these arrangements in the near term, but we expect to incur expenses in connection with these commercial agreements. If these arrangements do not result in increased users, hours streamed or we are unable to increase the revenue under these arrangements, our business may be harmed. The loss of a relationship with a TV brand or service operator could harm our results of operations, damage our reputation, increase pricing and promotional pressures from other partners and distribution channels or increase our marketing costs. We have also recently announced a whole home entertainment licensing program to license the Roku OS to manufacturers of smart speakers and sound bars.  If we are not successful in maintaining existing and creating new relationships with any of these third parties, or if we encounter technological, content licensing or other impediments to our development of these relationships, our ability to grow our business could be adversely impacted.

If our users sign up for offerings and services outside of our platform or though other channels on our platform, our business may be harmed.

We earn revenue by acquiring subscribers for certain of our content publishers activated on or through our platform. If users do not use our platform for these purchases or subscriptions for any reason, and instead pay for services directly with content publishers or by other means that we do not receive attribution for, our business may be harmed. In addition, certain channels available on our platform allow users to purchase additional streaming services from within their channels. The revenues we earn from these transactions are generally not equivalent to the revenues we earn from activations on or through our platform that we receive full attribution credit for. Accordingly, if users activate their subscriptions for content or services through other channels on our platform, our business may be harmed.

If we were to lose the services of our Chief Executive Officer or other members of our senior management team, we may not be able to execute our business strategy.

Our success depends in a large part upon the continued service of key members of our senior management team. In particular, our founder, President and Chief Executive Officer, Anthony Wood, is critical to our overall management, as well as the continued development of our devices and the Roku platform, our culture and our strategic direction. All of our executive officers are at will employees, and we do not maintain any key person life insurance policies. The loss of any member of our senior management team could harm our business.


If we are unable to attract and retain highly qualified employees, we may not be able to continue to grow our business.

Our ability to compete and grow depends in large part on the efforts and talents of our employees. Our employees, particularly engineers and other product developers, are in high demand, and we devote significant resources to identifying, hiring, training, successfully integrating and retaining these employees. As competition with other companies’ increases, we may incur significant expenses in attracting and retaining high quality engineers and other employees. The loss of employees or the inability to hire additional skilled employees as necessary to support the rapid growth of our business and the scale of our operations could result in significant disruptions to our business, and the integration of replacement personnel could be time-consuming and expensive and cause additional disruptions to our business.

We believe a critical component to our success and our ability to retain our best people is our culture. As we continue to grow and develop a public company infrastructure, we may find it difficult to maintain our entrepreneurial, execution-focused culture. In addition, many of our employees, may be able to receive significant proceeds from sales of our equity in the public markets, which may reduce their motivation to continue to work for us. Moreover, the equity ownership of many of our employees could create disparities in wealth among our employees, which may harm our culture and relations among employees and our business.

Most of our agreements with content publishers are not long term. Any disruption in the renewal of such agreements may result in the removal of certain content from our platform and may harm our active account growth and engagement.

We enter into agreements with all our content publishers, which have varying expiration dates; typically over one to three years. Upon expiration of these agreements, we are required to re-negotiate and renew these agreements in order to continue providing offerings from these content publishers on our platform. We may not be able to reach a satisfactory agreement before our existing agreements have expired. If we are unable to renew such agreements on a timely basis, we may be required to temporarily or permanently remove certain content from our platform. The loss of such content from our platform for any period of time may harm our business.

If our content publishers do not continue to develop channels for our platform and participate in new features that we may introduce from time to time, our business may be harmed.

As our streaming platform and products evolve, we will continue to introduce new features, which may or may not be attractive to our content publishers or meet their requirements. For example, some content publishers have elected not to participate in our cross-channel search feature, our integrated advertising framework known as RAF, or have imposed limits on our data gathering for usage within their channels. In addition, our streaming platform utilizes our proprietary Brightscript scripting language in order to allow our content publishers to develop and create channels on our streaming platform. If we introduce new features or utilize a new scripting language in the future, such a change may not comply with ourcertain content publisher’spublishers’ certification requirements. In addition, our content publishers may find other languages, such as HTML5, more attractive to develop for and shift their resources to developing their channels on other platforms. If key content publishers do not find our streaming platform simple and attractive to develop channels for, do not value and participate in all of the features and functionality that our streaming platform offers, or determine that our software developer kit or new features of our platform do not meet their certification requirements, our business may be harmed.

Our quarterly operating results

If the advertising and media and entertainment promotional spending campaigns on our platform are not relevant or not engaging to our users, our growth in active accounts and streaming hours may be volatileadversely impacted.
We have made, and are difficultcontinuing to predict,make, investments to enable advertisers and content publishers to deliver relevant advertising and media and entertainment promotional spending campaigns to our users. Existing and prospective
18


advertisers and content publishers may not be successful in serving ads and media and entertainment promotional spending campaigns that lead to and maintain user engagement. Those ads and campaigns may seem irrelevant, repetitive, or overly targeted and intrusive. We are continuously seeking to balance the objectives of our advertisers and content publishers with our desire to provide an optimal user experience, but we may not be successful in achieving a balance that continues to attract and retain users, advertisers, and content publishers. If the advertising and media and entertainment promotional spending campaigns on our streaming platform are not relevant or are overly intrusive and impede the use of our platform, our users may stop using our platform, which will harm our business.
The Roku Channel may not continue to attract a large number of users or generate significant revenue from advertising.
We operate The Roku Channel, which offers both ad-supported free access for users to a collection of films, television series, live linear television, and other content. We have incurred, and will continue to incur, costs and expenses in connection with the development, expansion, and operation of The Roku Channel, which we monetize primarily through advertising. For example, in 2021, we acquired content rights, including rights to certain projects in development, from the mobile-first video distribution service known as Quibi, and announced that The Roku Channel would become the home of such content. In addition, we acquired the entities comprising the This Old House business, which own and produce the “This Old House” and “Ask This Old House” TV programs and operate related business lines, to further the growth strategy and ad-supported content offerings in The Roku Channel.
If our users do not continue to stream the ad-supported content we make available on The Roku Channel, we will not have the opportunity to monetize The Roku Channel through revenue generated from advertising. In order to attract users to the ad-supported content on The Roku Channel and drive streaming of ad-supported video on The Roku Channel, we must secure rights to stream content that is appealing to our users and advertisers. In part, we do this by directly licensing certain content from content owners, such as television and movie studios. The agreements that we enter into with these content owners have varying terms and provide us with rights to make specific content available through The Roku Channel during certain periods of time. Upon expiration of these agreements, we are required to re-negotiate and renew these agreements with the content owners, or enter into new agreements with other content owners, in order to obtain rights to distribute additional titles or to extend the duration of the rights previously granted. If we are unable to enter into content license agreements on acceptable terms to access content that enables us to attract and retain users of the ad-supported content on The Roku Channel, or if the content we do secure rights to stream (including, for example, the content that we acquired through the Quibi and This Old House transactions) is ultimately not appealing to our users and advertisers, usage of The Roku Channel may decline, and our stock pricebusiness may decline ifbe harmed.
In addition, following the Quibi and This Old House transactions and the launch of our advertising brand studio, we fail to meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors.

Our revenue, gross profitare producing content for distribution on The Roku Channel and other operating results could vary significantlyplatforms. We have limited experience producing content, and we may not be successful in doing so in a cost-effective manner that is appealing to our users and advertisers and furthers the growth of The Roku Channel. We also take on risks associated with content production, such as completion and key talent risk. Furthermore, if the advertisements on The Roku Channel are not relevant to our users or such advertisements are overly intrusive and impede our users’ enjoyment of the available content, our users may not stream content and view advertisements on The Roku Channel, and The Roku Channel may not generate sufficient revenue from quarter-to-quarteradvertising to be cost effective for us to operate. In addition, we distribute The Roku Channel on platforms other than our own streaming platform, and year-to-yearthere can be no assurance that we will be successful in attracting a large number of users or generating significant revenue from advertising through the distribution of The Roku Channel on such other streaming platforms.

If our users sign up for offerings and services outside of our platform or through other channels on our platform, our business may failbe harmed.
We earn revenue by acquiring subscribers for certain of our content publishers activated on or through our platform, including Premium Subscriptions on The Roku Channel, which allow our users to matchpay for content from various content publishers. If users reduce the degree to which they use our past performance dueplatform for these purchases or subscriptions for any reason, and instead increase the degree to which they pay for services directly with content publishers or by other means for which we do not receive attribution, our business may be harmed.
In addition, certain channels available on our platform allow users to purchase additional streaming services from within their channels. The revenue we earn from these transactions is not always equivalent to the revenue we earn from sales of such additional services on a varietystand-alone basis through our platform. If users increase their spending on such in-channel transactions at the expense of factors, includingstand-alone purchases through our platform, our business may be harmed.
19


We operate in a rapidly evolving industry that will be impacted by many factors that are outside of our control. Factorscontrol, which makes it difficult to evaluate our business and prospects.
TV streaming is a rapidly evolving industry, making our business and prospects difficult to evaluate. The growth and profitability of this industry and the level of demand and market acceptance for our products and streaming platform are subject to a high degree of uncertainty. We believe that may contributethe continued growth of streaming as an entertainment alternative will depend on the availability and growth of cost-effective broadband internet access (including mobile broadband internet access), the quality and reliability of broadband content delivery, broadband service providers’ ability to control the variabilitydelivery speed of our operating resultsdifferent content traveling on their networks, the quality and cause the market price of our Class A common stock to fluctuate include:

the entrancereliability of new competitors or competitive products in our market, whether by established or new companies;


our ability to retain and grow our active account base and increase engagement among new and existing users;

our ability to maintain effective pricing practices, in response to the competitive markets in which we operate or other macroeconomic factors, such as inflation or increased product taxes;

our revenue mix, which drives gross profit;

seasonal or other shifts in advertising revenue or player sales;

the timing of the launch of new or updated products, streaming channels or features;

the addition or loss of popular content;

the ability of retailers to anticipate consumer demand;

an increase in the manufacturing or component costs of our players or the manufacturing or component costs of our TV brand licensees’ for Roku TVs; and

an increase in costs associated with protecting our intellectual property, defending against third-party intellectual property infringement allegations or procuring rights to third-party intellectual property.

Our gross profit margins vary across our devices and platform offerings. Player revenue has a lower gross margin comparedtechnology, the cost for users relative to platform revenue derived through our arrangements with advertising,other sources of content, distribution, billing and licensing activities. Gross margins on our players vary across player models and can change over time as a result of product transitions, pricing and configuration changes, component costs, player returns and other cost fluctuations. In addition, our gross margin and operating margin percentages, as well as overall profitability, may be adversely impacted as a resultthe quality and breadth of a shift in device, geographic or sales channel mix, component cost increases, price competition, or the introduction of new players, including thosecontent that have higher cost structures with flat or reduced pricing. We have in the past and may inis delivered across streaming platforms. Accordingly, the future strategically reduce our player gross margin inevolution of TV streaming as an effort to increase our active accounts and grow our gross profit. As a result, our player revenue may not increase as rapidly as it has historically, or at all, and, unless we are able to adequately increase our platform revenue and grow our active accounts, we may be unable to grow gross profit and our business will be harmed. If a reduction in gross margin does not result in an increase in our active accounts and gross profit, our financial results may suffer and our business may be harmed.

Our revenue and gross profit are subject to seasonality and if our sales during the holiday season fall below our expectations, our business may be harmed.

Seasonal consumer shopping patterns significantly affect our business. Specifically, our revenue and gross profit are traditionally strongest in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year due to higher consumer purchases and increased advertising during holiday periods. Fourth quarter revenue comprised 37% of total net revenue for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and fourth quarter gross profit comprised 37% of our total gross profit for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Furthermore, a significant percentage of our player sales through retailers in the fourth quarter are pursuant to committed sales agreements with retailers forindustry, which we recognize significant discounts in the average selling prices in the third quarter in an effort to grow our active accounts, which will reduce our player gross margin.


Given the seasonal nature of our player sales, accurate forecasting is critical to our operations. We anticipate that this seasonal impact on revenue and gross profit is likely to continue and any shortfall in expected fourth quarter revenue, due to macroeconomic conditions, a decline inimpact our success, is dependent on many of the effectivenessfactors that are outside of our promotional activities, actions by our competitors or disruptions in our supply or distribution chain, or for any other reason, would cause our full year results of operations to suffer significantly. For example, delays or disruptions at U.S. ports of entry could adversely affect our or our licensees’ ability to timely deliver players and co-branded Roku TVs to retailers during the holiday season. A substantial portion of our expenses are personnel related and include salaries, stock-based compensation and benefits that are not seasonal in nature. Accordingly, in the event of a revenue shortfall, we would be unable to mitigate the negative impact on margins, at least in the short term,control.

We and our business would be harmed.

We and ourRoku TV brand partners depend on our retail sales channels to effectively market and sell our players and Roku TVs,TV models, and if we or our partners fail to maintain and expand effective retail sales channels, we could experience lower player or Roku TV model sales.

To continue to acquire newincrease our active accounts, we must maintain and expand our retail sales channels. The majority of our players and our TV brand partners’ Roku TVsTV models are sold through traditional brick and mortar retailers, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart, including their online sales platforms, and online retailers such as Amazon.com. To a lesser extent, weAmazon. We also sell players directly through our website and internationally through distributors. In 2016distributors and 2017, Amazon.com,retailers such as Coppel in Mexico, Magazine Luiza in Brazil, and MediaMarkt in Germany. As we have only recently expanded to certain international markets, we may not have established a strong reputation or relationships with global retailers as compared to our domestic operations or our competitors in international markets. Amazon, Best Buy, and Walmart eachin total accounted for more than 10% of our player revenue and are expected to each account for more than 10% of our player revenue in fiscal 2018. These three retailers collectively accounted for 61%69% of our player revenue for both of the yearyears ended December 31, 20172021 and 2016. These2020. Our retailers and our international distributors also sell products offered by our competitors. We have no minimum purchase commitments or long-term contracts with any of these retailers or distributors. If one or several retailers or distributors were to discontinue selling our players or our TV brand partners’ Roku TVs, orTV models, choose not to prominently display those devices in their stores or on their websites, or close or severely limit access to their brick and mortar locations due to COVID-19 restrictions or other concerns, the volume of our streaming devices or our TV brand partners’ Roku devicesTV models sold could decrease, which would harm our business. If any of our existing TV brand partners choose to work exclusively with, or divert a significant portion of their business with us to other operating system developers, this may impact our ability to license the Roku OS and our smart TV reference design to TV brands and our ability to continue to grow active accounts. Traditional retailers have limited shelf and end cap space in their stores and limited promotional budgets, and online retailers have limited prime website product placement space. Competition is intense for these resources, and a competitor with more extensive product lines, and stronger brand identity and greater marketing resources, such as AppleAmazon or Google, possesses greater bargaining power with retailers. In addition, one of our online retailers, Amazon.com,Amazon, sells its own competitive TV streaming productsdevices and smart TVs, is able to market and promote these products more prominently on its website, and could refuse to offer or promote our devices.devices on its website. Any reduction in our ability to place and promote our devices, or increased competition for available shelf or website placement, wouldcould require us to increase our marketing expenditures simply to maintain our product visibility or result in reduced visibility for our products, which may harm our business. In particular, the availability of product placement during peak retail periods, such as the holiday season, is critical to our revenue growth, and if we are unable to effectively sell our devices during these periods, our business would be harmed.

If our efforts to build a strong brand and maintain customer satisfaction and loyalty are not successful, we may not be able to attract or retain users, and our business may be harmed.

Building and maintaining a strong brand is important to attract and retain users, as potential users have a number of TV streaming choices. Successfully building a brand is a time consumingtime-consuming and comprehensive endeavor and can be positively and negatively impacted by any number of factors. Some of theseCertain factors, such as the quality or pricing of our players or our customer service, are within our control. Other factors, such as the quality and reliability of Roku TVsTV models and the quality of the content that our content publishers provide, may be out of our control, yet users may nonetheless attribute those factors to us. Our competitors may be able to achieve and maintain brand awareness and market share more quickly and effectively than we can. Many of our competitors are larger companies and promotemay have greater resources to devote to the promotion of their brands through traditional forms of advertising, such as print media and TV commercials, and have substantial resources to devote to such efforts. Our competitors may also have greater resources to utilize Internetdigital advertising or website product placement more effectively than we can.placement. If we are unable to execute on building a strong brand, it may be difficult to differentiate our business and streaming platform from our competitors in the marketplace, therefore our ability to attract and retain users may be adversely affected and our business may be harmed.

Our streaming platform allows our customersusers to choose from thousands of channels, representing a variety of content from a wide range of content publishers. Our customersusers can choose and control which channels they download and watch, and they can use parental controlcertain settings to prevent channels from being downloaded to our


streaming devices. While we have policies

20


that prohibit the publication of content that is unlawful, incites illegal activities, or violates third-party rights, among other things, we may distribute channels that include controversial content. Controversies related to the content included on certain of the channels that we distribute have resulted in, and could in the future result in, negative publicity, cause harm to our reputation and brand, or subject us to claims and may harm our business.

We must successfully manage device introductions and transitions in order to remain competitive.

We must continually develop new and improved devices that meet changing consumer demands. Moreover, the introduction of a new device is a complex task, involving significant expenditures in research and development, promotion and sales channel development. For example, in 2017 we participated in the introduction of dozens of new models of Roku TVs with TCL that incorporate new technologies and larger screen sizes and we updated our entire streaming player product line for higher performance and new features. Whether users will broadly adopt new devices is not certain. Our future success will depend on our ability to develop new and competitively priced devices and add new desirable content and features to our platform. Moreover, we must introduce new players in a timely and cost-effective manner, and we must secure production orders for those players from our contract manufacturer and component suppliers. The development of new devices is a highly complex process, and while our research and development efforts are aimed at solving increasingly complex problems, we do not expect that all of our projects will be successful. The successful development and introduction of new devices depends on a number of factors, including the following:

the accuracy of our forecasts for market requirements beyond near term visibility;

our ability to anticipate and react to new technologies and evolving consumer trends;

our development, licensing or acquisition of new technologies;

our timely completion of new designs and development;

the ability of our contract manufacturer to cost-effectively manufacture our new players;

the availability of materials and key components used in manufacturing; and

our ability to attract and retain world-class research and development personnel.

If any of these or other factors becomes problematic, we may not be able to develop and introduce new devices in a timely or cost-effective manner, and our business may be harmed.

We do not have manufacturing capabilities and primarily depend upon a single contract manufacturer, and our operations could be disrupted if we encounter problems with the contract manufacturer.

We do not have any internal manufacturing capabilities and primarily rely upon one contract manufacturer, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. Ltd., or Foxconn, to build our players. Our contract manufacturer is vulnerable to capacity constraints and reduced component availability, and our control over delivery schedules, manufacturing yields and costs, particularly when components are in short supply or when we introduce a new player or feature, is limited. In addition, we have limited control over Foxconn’s quality systems and controls, and therefore must rely on Foxconn to manufacture our players to our quality and performance standards and specifications. Delays, component shortages and other manufacturing and supply problems could impair the retail distribution of our players and ultimately our brand. Furthermore, any adverse change in our contract manufacturer’s financial or business condition could disrupt our ability to supply players to our retailers and distributors.

Our contract with Foxconn does not obligate them to supply our players in any specific quantity or at any specific price. In the event Foxconn is unable to fulfill our production requirements in a timely manner or decide to terminate their relationship with us, our order fulfillment may be delayed and we would have to identify, select and qualify acceptable alternative contract manufacturers. Alternative contract manufacturers may not be available to us when needed or may not be in a position to satisfy our production requirements at commercially reasonable prices or to our quality and performance standards. Any significant interruption in manufacturing at Foxconn would require us to reduce our supply of players to our retailers and distributors, which in turn would reduce our revenue. In addition, the Foxconn facilities are located in the People’s Republic of China and may be subject to political, economic, social and legal uncertainties that may harm our relationships with these parties. We believe that the


international location of these facilities increases supply risk, including the risk of supply interruptions. Furthermore, any manufacturing issues affecting the quality of our products, including Roku TVs or players, could harm our business.

If Foxconn fails for any reason to continue manufacturing our players in required volumes and at high quality levels, or at all, we would have to identify, select and qualify acceptable alternative contract manufacturers. Alternative contract manufacturers may not be available to us when needed, or may not be in a position to satisfy our production requirements at commercially reasonable prices or to our quality and performance standards. Any significant interruption in manufacturing at Foxconn would require us to reduce our supply of players to our retailers and distributors, which in turn would reduce our revenue and user growth.

If we fail to accurately forecast our manufacturing requirements and manage our inventory with our contract manufacturer, we could incur additional costs, experience manufacturing delays and lose revenue.

We bear supply risk under our contract manufacturing arrangement with Foxconn. Lead times for the materials and components that Foxconn orders on our behalf through different component suppliers vary significantly and depend on numerous factors, including the specific supplier, contract terms and market demand for a component at a given time. Lead times for certain key materials and components incorporated into our players are currently lengthy, requiring our contract manufacturer to order materials and components several months in advance. If we overestimate our production requirements, our contract manufacturer may purchase excess components and build excess inventory. If our contract manufacturer, at our request, purchase excess components that are unique to our players or build excess players, we could be required to pay for these excess components or players. In the past, we have agreed to reimburse our contract manufacturer for purchased components that were not used as a result of our decision to discontinue players or the use of particular components. If we incur costs to cover excess supply commitments, this would harm our business.

Conversely, if we underestimate our player requirements, our contract manufacturer may have inadequate component inventory, which could interrupt the manufacturing of our players and result in delays or cancellation of orders from retailers and distributors. In addition, from time to time we have experienced unanticipated increases in demand that resulted in the need to ship players via air freight, which is more expensive than ocean freight, and adversely affected our player gross margin during such periods of high demand, for example, during end-of-year holidays. If we fail to accurately forecast our manufacturing requirements, our business may be harmed.

Our players incorporate key components from sole source suppliers and if our contract manufacturer is unable to source these components on a timely basis, due to fabrication capacity issues or other material supply constraints, we will not be able to deliver our players to our retailers and distributors.

We depend on sole source suppliers for key components in our players. Our players utilize specific system on chip, or SoC, WiFi silicon products and WiFi front-end modules from various manufacturers, depending on the player, for which we do not have a second source. Although this approach allows us to maximize player performance on lower cost hardware, reduce engineering qualification costs and develop stronger relationships with our strategic suppliers, this also creates supply chain risk. These sole source suppliers could be constrained by fabrication capacity issues or material supply issues, stop producing such components, cease operations or be acquired by, or enter into exclusive arrangements with, our competitors or other companies. Neither we nor our contract manufacturer has long-term supply agreements with these suppliers. Instead, our contract manufacturer typically purchases the components required to manufacture our players on a purchase order basis. As a result, most of these suppliers can stop selling to us at any time, requiring us to find another source, or can raise their prices, which could impact our gross margins. Any such interruption or delay may force us to seek similar components from alternative sources, which may not be available. Switching from a sole source supplier would require that we redesign our players to accommodate new components, and would require us to re-qualify our players with regulatory bodies, such as the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, which would be costly and time-consuming.

Our reliance on sole source suppliers involves a number of additional risks, including risks related to:

supplier capacity constraints;


price increases;

timely delivery;

component quality; and

delays in, or the inability to execute on, a supplier roadmap for components and technologies.

Any interruption in the supply of sole source components for our players could adversely affect our ability to meet scheduled player deliveries to our retailers and distributors, result in lost sales and higher expenses and harm our business.

If we have difficulty managing our growth in operating expenses, our business could be harmed.

We have experienced significant growth in research and development, sales and marketing, support services and operations in recent years and expect to continue to expand these activities. For example, our research and development expenses increased to $107.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $76.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. Our historical growth has placed, and expected future growth will continue to place, significant demands on our management, as well as our financial and operational resources, to:

manage a larger organization;

hire more employees, including engineers with relevant skills and experience;

expand our manufacturing and distribution capacity;

increase our sales and marketing efforts;

broaden our customer support capabilities;

support a larger number of TV brand and service operators;

implement appropriate operational and financial systems;

expand internationally; and

maintain effective financial disclosure controls and procedures.

If we fail to manage our growth effectively, we may not be able to execute our business strategies and our business will be harmed.

We may be unable to successfully expand our international operations, including our recent expansion into Latin America. In addition, our international expansion plans, if implemented, will subject us to a variety of risks that may harm our business.

We currently generate almost all of our revenue in the United States and have limited experience marketing, selling and supporting our players and monetizing our platform outside the United States. In addition, we have limited experience managing the administrative aspects of a global organization. We currently sell our players in Canada, the United Kingdom, the Republic of Ireland and France and several Latin American countries.  While we intend to continue to explore opportunities to expand our business in international markets in which we see compelling opportunities to build relationships with users, advertisers and retail distributors, TV brands and service operators, we may not be able to create or maintain international market demand for our players and TV streaming platform. In addition, as we expand our operations internationally, our support organization will face additional challenges, including those associated with delivering support, training and documentation in languages other than English. We may also be subject to new statutory restrictions and risks. For example, there may be no foreign equivalents to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act to shield us from liability in connection with infringing materials that content publishers may make available on our platform. In addition, we may be required in international jurisdictions to offer longer warranty periods than we currently offer in the United States. If we invest substantial time and resources to expand our international operations and are unable to do so successfully and in a timely manner, our business and financial condition may be harmed.


In the course of expanding our international operations and operating overseas, we will be subject to a variety of risks, including:

differing regulatory requirements, including tax laws, trade laws, labor regulations, tariffs, export quotas, custom duties or other trade restrictions;

greater difficulty supporting and localizing our players and platform;

our ability to deliver or provide access to popular streaming channels to users in certain international markets;

different or unique competitive pressures as a result of, among other things, the presence of local consumer electronics companies and the greater availability of free content on over-the-air channels in certain countries;

challenges inherent in efficiently managing an increased number of employees over large geographic distances, including the need to implement appropriate systems, policies, compensation and benefits and compliance programs;

differing legal and court systems, including limited or unfavorable intellectual property protection;

risk of change in international political or economic conditions;

restrictions on the repatriation of earnings; and

working capital constraints.

If ongoing litigation in Mexico continues to prevent our products from entering the marketplace, our international expansion plans will be impacted and our operating results may suffer.

We are involved in litigation in Mexico that was commenced by a large Mexican pay TV and Internet access provider. Roku was not named as a defendant in this case, and the case principally targeted entities that are alleged to sell unlicensed content to consumers using our platform, among other means. At the commencement of this case, however, a court issued a temporary ban on the importation and sale of Roku devices in Mexico, which remains in effect. In response to this ban, the Company commenced a separate proceeding in a federal District Court in Mexico City challenging the constitutionality of the ban, which proceeding is ongoing. Involvement in these legal proceedings has been complicated and has drawn management time and company resources.  In addition to reducing revenue for products sold in Mexico, our involvement in this litigation has caused us to incur legal expenses and other costs, and to the extent these legal and other expenses grow, our involvement in this litigation, or similar legal matters in the future, could be disruptive to our business.

If we experience higher player returns than we expect and are unable to resell such returned players as refurbished players our business could be harmed.

We offer customers who purchase players through our website 30 days to return such players. We also generally honor the return policies of our retail and distribution partners, who typically allow customers to return players, even with open packaging within certain time periods that may exceed 30 days. We generally resell any returned players as refurbished players. In the event we decide to permanently reduce the retail prices of our players, we provide price protection to certain distribution partners for the players they hold in inventory at the time of the price drop. To the extent we experience a greater number of returns than we expect, are unable to resell returned players as refurbished players or are required to provide price protection in amounts greater than we expect, our business could be harmed.


We are subject to payment-related risks and, if our advertisers or advertising agencies do not pay or dispute their invoices, our business may be harmed.

Many of our contracts with advertising agencies provide that if the advertiser does not pay the agency, the agency is not liable to us, and we must seek payment solely from the advertiser, a type of arrangement called sequential liability. Contracting with these agencies, which in some cases have or may develop higher-risk credit profiles, may subject us to greater credit risk than if we were to contract directly with advertisers. This credit risk may vary depending on the nature of an advertising agency’s aggregated advertiser base. In addition, typically, we are contractually required to pay advertising inventory data suppliers within a negotiated period of time, regardless of whether our advertisers or advertising agencies pay us on time, or at all. In addition, we typically experience slow payment cycles by advertising agencies as is common in the advertising industry. While we attempt to balance payment periods with our suppliers and advertisers and advertising agencies, we are not always successful. As a result, we can often face a timing issue with our accounts payable on shorter cycles than our accounts receivables, requiring us to remit payments from our own funds, and accept the risk of credit losses.
We may also be involved in disputes with agencies and their advertisers over the operation of our streaming platform, or the terms of our agreements.agreements or our billings for purchases made by them through our streaming platform or through our DSP. If we are unable to collect or make adjustments to bills, we could incur write-offs for bad debt,credit losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations for the periods in which the write-offs occur. In the future, bad debt may exceed reserves for such contingencies, and our bad debt exposure may increase over time. Any increase in write-offs for bad debt could have a materially negative effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. If we are not paid by our advertisers or advertising agencies on time or at all, our business may be harmed.

The quality of our customer support is important, and if we fail to provide adequate levels of customer support, we could lose users and TV brand partners or other licensees, which would harm our business.
Our users depend on our customer support organization to resolve any issues relating to our devices. A high level of support is critical for the successful marketing and sale of our devices. We currently outsource the majority of our customer support operation to a third-party customer support organization which provides support to end users of our players and audio products. In addition, we train our TV brand partners and service operator licensees to provide first-level customer support to users of Roku TV models and co-branded players. If we do not effectively train, update, and manage our third-party customer support organization to assist our users and licensees, and if that support organization does not succeed in helping them quickly resolve issues or provide effective ongoing support, it could adversely affect our ability to sell our devices to users and harm our reputation with potential new users and our licensees.
We must successfully manage streaming device and other product introductions and transitions to remain competitive.
We must continually develop new and improved streaming devices and other products that meet changing consumer demands. Moreover, the introduction of a new streaming device or other new product is a complex task, involving significant expenditures in research and development, promotion, and sales channel development. For example, in recent years, we introduced Roku Streambars, Roku wireless speakers, and Roku wireless subwoofers, among other products. Whether users will broadly adopt new streaming devices or other new products is not certain. Our future success will depend on our ability to develop new and competitively priced streaming devices and other new products and add new desirable content and features to our streaming platform. Moreover, we must introduce new streaming devices and other new products in a timely and cost-effective manner, and we must secure production orders for those products from our contract manufacturers. The development of new streaming devices and other new products is a highly complex process, and while our research and development efforts are aimed at solving increasingly complex problems, we do not expect that all of our projects will be successful. The successful development and introduction of new streaming devices and other new products depends on a number of factors, including:
the accuracy of our forecasts for market requirements beyond near-term visibility;
our ability to anticipate and react to new technologies and evolving consumer trends;
our development, licensing, or acquisition of new technologies;
our timely completion of new designs and development;
our ability to timely and adequately redesign or resolve design or manufacturing issues;
our ability to identify and contract with an appropriate manufacturer;
21


the ability of our contract manufacturers to cost-effectively manufacture our new products;
the availability of materials and key components used in manufacturing;
tariffs, trade, sanctions, and export restrictions by the U.S. or foreign governments, which could impact the pricing, timing and availability of such devices and depress consumer demand, limit the ability of our contract manufacturers to obtain key parts, components, software, and technologies, and lead to shortages;
the ability of our contract manufacturers to produce quality products and minimize defects, manufacturing mishaps, and shipping delays; and
our ability to attract and retain world-class research and development personnel.
If any of these or other factors materializes, we may not be able to develop and introduce new products in a timely or cost-effective manner, and our business may be harmed.
We do not have manufacturing capabilities and primarily depend upon a limited number of contract manufacturers, and our operations could be disrupted if we encounter problems with our contract manufacturers.
We do not have any internal manufacturing capabilities and rely on a limited number of contract manufacturers to build our players and audio products. Our contract manufacturers are vulnerable to, among other issues:
capacity constraints;
reduced component availability;
production, supply chain, or shipping disruptions or delays, including from strikes, mechanical issues, quality control issues, natural disasters, and public health crises, such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic; and
the impact of U.S. or foreign tariffs, trade, or sanctions restrictions on components, finished goods, software, other products, or data transfers.
As a result, we have limited control over delivery schedules, manufacturing yields, and costs, particularly when components are in short supply or when we introduce new streaming devices or other products. For example, in 2021, global supply chain disruptions led to increased component costs and shipping costs for our products, which negatively affected our player gross margin. We expect that global supply chain disruptions will continue in 2022, and our player gross margin may continue to be adversely affected.
We also have limited control over our contract manufacturers’ quality systems and controls, and therefore must rely on them to manufacture our players and other products to our quality and performance standards and specifications. Delays, component shortages, quality issues, and other manufacturing and supply problems could impair the retail distribution of our players and other products and ultimately our brand. Furthermore, any adverse change in our contract manufacturers’ financial or business condition could disrupt our ability to supply our players or other products to our retailers and distributors.
We also rely upon our contract manufacturers to perform some of the development work on our products. The contract manufacturers may be unwilling or unable to successfully complete desired development. Delays in development work by contract manufacturers could delay launch of new or improved products.
Our contracts with our contract manufacturers generally may not contain terms that protect us against development, manufacturing, and supply disruptions or risks. For example, such contracts may not obligate our contract manufacturers to supply our players or other products in any specific quantity or at any specific price. If our contract manufacturers are unable to fulfill our production requirements in a timely manner, if their costs increase because of inflationary pressures, U.S. or international tariffs, sanctions, export or import restrictions, or if they decide to terminate their relationship with us, our order fulfillment may be delayed or terminated, and we would have to attempt to identify, select, and qualify acceptable alternative contract manufacturers. Alternative contract manufacturers may not be available to us when needed or may not be in a position to satisfy our production requirements at commercially reasonable prices, to our quality and performance standards on a timely basis, or at all. Any significant interruption in manufacturing at our contract manufacturers for any reason could require us to reduce our supply of players or other products to our retailers and distributors, which in turn would reduce our revenue, or incur higher freight costs than anticipated, which would negatively impact our player gross margin. In addition, our contract manufacturers’ facilities are located in Southeast Asia, the People’s Republic of China, and Brazil and may be subject to political, economic, labor, trade, public health, social, and legal uncertainties that may harm or disrupt our relationships with these parties or their ability to perform. We believe that the international location of these facilities increases supply risk, including the risk of supply interruptions, tariffs, and trade restrictions on exports or imports.
22


The supply of Roku TV models to the market could be disrupted if our Roku TV brand partners encounter problems with their internal operations or contract manufacturers or suppliers.
Certain of our Roku TV brand partners have internal manufacturing capabilities and others primarily rely upon contract manufacturers to build the Roku TV models that they sell to retailers. Regardless of whether their manufacturing capabilities are internal or contracted, our Roku TV brand partners’ manufacturers may be vulnerable to capacity constraints and reduced component availability; increases in U.S. tariffs on imports of Roku TV models; future possible changes in U.S. regulations on exports of U.S. technologies; U.S. restrictions on dealings with certain countries, parties, regions, or imported inputs; foreign tariffs on U.S. parts or components for Roku TV models that are assembled outside of the United States; and supply chain disruptions and shipping delays. Their control over delivery schedules, manufacturing yields, and costs, particularly when components are in short supply, may be limited. For those Roku TV brand partners with contract manufacturers or suppliers, the problems are exacerbated because the contract manufacturer is a third party, and the Roku TV brand partner does not have direct visibility into or control over the operations. Delays, component shortages, and other manufacturing and supply problems (whether due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the current high demand for consumer electronics and information technology products, or other reasons) could impair the retail distribution of their Roku TV models. Interruptions in the supply of Roku TV models to retailers and distributors at times have affected, and could adversely affect in the future, our active accounts and streaming hours. For example, in 2021, some of our Roku TV brand partners faced supply chain and inventory challenges that negatively impacted their unit sales, which we believe affected our streaming hours and active account growth.
Furthermore, any manufacturing issues affecting the quality or performance of our Roku TV brand partners’ Roku TV models could harm our brand and our business.
If we fail to accurately forecast our manufacturing requirements and manage our inventory with our contract manufacturers, we could incur additional costs, experience manufacturing delays, and lose revenue.
We bear risks of excess and insufficient inventories under our contract manufacturing arrangements. For example, our contract manufacturers order materials and components in advance in an effort to meet our projected needs for our products. Lead times for the materials and components that our contract manufacturers order on our behalf through different component suppliers may vary significantly and depend on numerous factors outside of our control, including the specific supplier, contract terms, shipping and air freight, market demand for a component at a given time, and trade and government relations. Lead times for certain key materials and components incorporated into our players or other products are currently lengthy and may require our contract manufacturers to order materials and components many months in advance. If we overestimate our production requirements, our contract manufacturers may purchase excess components and build excess inventory. If our contract manufacturers, at our request, purchase excess components or build excess products, we could be required to pay for these excess components or products. In the past, we have agreed to reimburse our contract manufacturers for purchased components that were not used as a result of our decision to discontinue a certain model of player or the use of particular components. If we incur costs to cover excess supply commitments, this would harm our business.
Conversely, if we underestimate our player or other product requirements, our contract manufacturers may have inadequate material or component inventory, which could interrupt the manufacturing of our players or other products, result in insufficient quantities available to meet demand, and result in delays or cancellation of orders from retailers and distributors. In addition, from time to time we have experienced unanticipated increases in demand that resulted in the need to ship players via air freight, which is more expensive than ocean freight, and adversely affected our player gross margin during such periods of high demand (for example, during end-of-year holidays). Throughout 2021, the COVID-19 pandemic, supply chain disruptions, shipping delays, and sustained high demand for consumer electronics and information technology products created tight component supply conditions and logistical delays for our products and key components, which adversely impacted our player gross margin. If we fail to accurately forecast our manufacturing requirements, our business may be harmed.
Our players and other products incorporate key components from sole source suppliers, and if our contract manufacturers are unable to obtain sufficient quantities of these components on a timely basis, we will not be able to deliver our products to our retailers and distributors.
We depend on sole source suppliers for key components in our players and other products. For example, each of our players may utilize a specific system on chip (or SoC), Wi-Fi silicon product, and Wi-Fi front-end module, each of which may be available from only a single manufacturer and for which we do not have a second source. Although this approach allows us to maximize product performance on lower cost hardware, reduce engineering development and qualification costs, and develop stronger relationships with our strategic suppliers, this also creates supply chain risk. These sole-source suppliers could be constrained by fabrication capacity issues or material supply issues, such as U.S. or foreign tariffs, war or other government or trade relations issues, other export or import restrictions on parts or components for finished
23


products that are used in final assembly of their components (or on the finished products themselves), or shortages of key components. There is also the risk that the strategic supplier may stop producing such components, cease operations, be acquired by or enter into exclusive arrangements with our competitors or other companies, put contract manufacturers on allocation because of the ongoing global semiconductor shortage, or become subject to U.S. or foreign sanctions or export control restrictions or penalties. Such suppliers also have experienced, and may continue to experience, production, shipping, or logistical constraints arising from the COVID-19 pandemic. Such interruptions and delays have forced us to seek similar components from alternative sources, which have not always been available, and have caused us to delay product introductions and incur air freight expense. Switching from a sole-source supplier may require that we adapt our software, and redesign our products to accommodate new chips and components, and may require us to re-qualify our products with regulatory bodies, such as the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”), which would be costly and time-consuming.
Our reliance on sole-source suppliers involves a number of additional risks, including risks related to:
supplier capacity constraints;
price increases, including increases related to inflationary pressures;
timely delivery;
component quality; and
delays in, or the inability to execute on, a supplier roadmap for components and technologies.
Any interruption in the supply of sole-source components for our products could adversely affect our ability to meet scheduled product deliveries to our retailers and distributors, result in lost sales and higher expenses, and harm our business.
Our players and Roku TV models must operate with various offerings, technologies, and systems from our content publishers that we do not control. If our streaming devices do not operate effectively with those offerings, technologies, and systems, our business may be harmed.
The Roku OS is designed for performance using relatively low-cost hardware, which enables us to drive user growth with our players and Roku TV models offered at a low cost to consumers. However, this hardware must be interoperable with all channels and other offerings, technologies, and systems from our content publishers, including virtual multi-channel video programming distributors. We have no control over these offerings, technologies, and systems beyond our channel certification requirements, and if our players and Roku TV models do not provide our users with a high-quality experience on those offerings on a cost-effective basis or if changes are made to those offerings that are not compatible with our players or Roku TV models, we may be unable to increase active account growth and user engagement or may be required to increase our hardware costs, and our business will be harmed. We plan to continue to introduce new products regularly, and we have experienced that it takes time to optimize such products to function well with these offerings, technologies and systems. In addition, many of our largest content publishers have the right to test and certify our new products before we can publish their channels on these devices. The certification processes can be time consuming and introduce third-party dependencies into our product release cycles. If content publishers do not certify new products on a timely basis or require us to make changes in order to obtain certifications, our product release plans may be adversely impacted, we may not be able to offer certain products to all TV brand partners or we may not continue to offer certain channels. To continue to grow our active accounts and user engagement, we will need to prioritize development of our streaming devices to work better with new offerings, technologies, and systems. If we are unable to maintain consistent operability of our devices that is on parity with or better than other platforms, our business could be harmed. In addition, any future changes to offerings, technologies, and systems from our content publishers, such as virtual service operators, may impact the accessibility, speed, functionality, and other performance aspects of our streaming devices. We may not successfully develop streaming devices that operate effectively with these offerings, technologies, or systems. If it becomes more difficult for our users to access and use these offerings, technologies, or systems, our business could be harmed.
Our streaming devices are technically complex and may contain undetected hardware errors or software bugs, which could manifest themselves in ways that could harm our reputation and our business.
Our streaming devices and the products of our TV brand partners are technically complex and have contained and may in the future contain undetected software bugs or hardware errors. These bugs and errors can manifest themselves in any number of ways in our devices or our streaming platform, including through diminished performance, security vulnerabilities, data quality in logs or interpretation of data, malfunctions, or even permanently disabled devices. Some errors in our devices may only be discovered after a device has been shipped and used by users and may in some cases only be detected under certain circumstances or after extended use. We also update the Roku OS and our software on a regular basis, and, despite our quality assurance processes, we could introduce bugs in the process of any such update. The introduction of a serious software bug could result in devices becoming permanently disabled. We offer a limited one-year warranty in the United States, although applicable law or our software updates could cause us to be responsible for issues
24


with devices after this period of time. Any defects discovered in our devices after commercial release could result in loss of revenue or delay in revenue recognition, loss of customer goodwill and users, and increased service costs, any of which could harm our business, operating results, and financial condition. We could also face claims for product or information liability, tort or breach of warranty, or other violations of laws or regulations. In addition, our contracts with users contain provisions relating to warranty disclaimers and liability limitations, which may not be upheld. Defending a lawsuit, regardless of its merit, is costly and may divert management’s attention and adversely affect the market’s perception of Roku and our products. In addition, if our insurance coverage proves inadequate or future coverage is unavailable on acceptable terms or at all, our business could be harmed.
Components used in our products may fail as a result of manufacturing, design, or other defects over which we have no control and render our devices permanently inoperable.
We rely on third-party component suppliers to provide certain functionalities needed for the operation and use of our products. Any errors or defects in such third-party technology could result in errors or defects in our products that could harm our business. If these components have a manufacturing, design, or other defect, they can cause our products to fail and render them permanently inoperable. For example, the typical means by which our users connect their home networks to our players is by way of a Wi-Fi access point in the home network router. If the Wi-Fi receiver in our player fails, then our player cannot detect a home network’s Wi-Fi access point, and our player will not be able to display or deliver any content to the TV screen. As a result, we may have to recall and replace these players at our sole cost and expense. Should we have a widespread problem of this kind, our reputation in the market could be adversely affected, and our replacement of these players would harm our business.
If we are unable to obtain necessary or desirable third-party technology licenses, our ability to develop new streaming players or platform enhancements may be impaired.
We utilize commercially available off-the-shelf technology in the development of our players and streaming platform. As we continue to introduce new features or improvements to our players and our streaming platform, we may be required to license additional technologies from third parties. These third-party licenses may be unavailable to us on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. If we are unable to obtain necessary third-party licenses, we may be required to obtain substitute technologies with lower quality or performance standards, or at a greater cost, any of which could harm the competitiveness of our players, streaming platform, and our business.
Risks Related to Operating and Growing Our Business
We have incurred operating losses in the past, and although we have achieved profitability in recent quarters, we may not be able to maintain or grow our profitability.
We have incurred operating losses in the past, and we may incur operating losses in the future. Although we have achieved profitability in recent quarters, we may not be able to maintain or grow our profitability. As of December 31, 2021, we had an accumulated deficit of $90.0 million. We expect our operating expenses to increase in the future as we continue to expand our operations and invest in growth and new areas. If our revenue and gross profit do not grow at a greater rate than our operating expenses, we may not be able to maintain and grow our profitability. We expect our profitability to fluctuate in the future for a number of reasons, including without limitation the other risks and uncertainties described herein. Additionally, we may encounter unforeseen operating or legal expenses, difficulties, complications, delays, and other factors that may result in losses in future periods.
Our quarterly operating results may be volatile and are difficult to predict, and our stock price may decline if we fail to meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors.
Our revenue, gross profit, and other operating results could vary significantly from quarter-to-quarter and year-to-year and may fail to match our past performance due to a variety of factors, including many factors that are outside of our control. Factors that may contribute to the variability of our operating results and cause the market price of our Class A common stock to fluctuate include:
the entrance of new competitors or competitive products or services, whether by established or new companies;
our ability to retain and grow our active account base, increase engagement among new and existing users, and monetize our streaming platform;
our ability to maintain effective pricing practices in response to the competitive markets in which we operate or other macroeconomic factors, such as increased taxes or inflationary pressures, such as those the market is currently experiencing, and our ability to control costs, including our operating expenses;
our revenue mix, which drives gross profit;
25


supply of advertising inventory on our advertising platform and advertiser demand for advertising inventory;
seasonal, cyclical, or other shifts in revenue from advertising or player sales;
the timing of the launch of new or updated products, channels, or features;
the addition or loss of popular content or channels;
the expense and availability of content to license or produce for The Roku Channel;
the ability of retailers to anticipate consumer demand;
an increase in the manufacturing or component costs of our players or our TV brand partners’ Roku TV models;
delays in delivery of our players or our partners’ Roku TV models, or disruptions in our or our TV brand partners’ supply or distribution chains, including any disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, tariffs, or other trade restrictions or disruptions; and
an increase in costs associated with protecting our intellectual property, defending against third-party intellectual property infringement allegations, or procuring rights to third-party intellectual property.
Our gross margins vary across our devices and platform offerings. Our player segment has lower gross margins compared to our platform segment (which generates revenue from digital advertising sales and related services, content distribution services, and licensing arrangements). Gross margins on our players vary across models and can change over time as a result of product transitions, pricing and configuration changes, component costs, player returns, and other cost fluctuations. In addition, our gross margin and operating margin percentages, as well as overall profitability, may be adversely impacted as a result of a shift in device, geographic, or sales channel mix, component cost increases, price competition, or the introduction of new streaming devices, including those that have higher cost structures with flat or reduced pricing. We have in the past and may in the future strategically reduce our player gross margin in an effort to increase the number of active accounts and grow our gross profit. As a result, our player revenue may not increase as rapidly as it has historically, or at all, and, unless we are able to continue to increase our platform revenue and grow the number of active accounts, we may be unable to grow gross profit and our business will be harmed. For the year ended December 31, 2021, our player gross margin was negative due to rising component and shipping costs. Though we do not believe that the increased component and shipping costs are permanent, they may continue to impact us in the near future and are expected to cause player gross margin to be negative until such conditions normalize. If a reduction in gross margin does not result in an increase in our active accounts or an increase our platform revenue and gross profit, our financial results may suffer, and our business may be harmed.
If we have difficulty managing our growth in operating expenses, our business could be harmed.
We have experienced significant growth in our research and development, sales and marketing, support services, operations, and general and administrative functions in recent years and expect to continue to expand these activities. Our historical growth has placed, and expected future growth will continue to place, significant demands on our management, as well as our financial and operational resources, to:
manage a larger organization;
hire more employees, including engineers with relevant skills and experience;
expand internationally;
increase our sales and marketing efforts;
expand the capacity to manufacture and distribute our players;
broaden our customer support capabilities;
support a larger number of TV brand partners and service operators;
expand and improve the content offering on our platform;
implement appropriate operational and financial systems; and
maintain effective financial disclosure controls and procedures.
If we fail to manage our growth effectively, we may not be able to execute our business strategies and our business will be harmed.
We may be unable to successfully expand our international operations, and our international expansion plans, if implemented, will subject us to a variety of risks that may harm our business.
We currently generate the vast majority of our revenue in the United States and have limited experience marketing, selling, licensing, and supporting our devices and running or monetizing our streaming platform outside the United States. In addition, we have limited experience managing the administrative aspects of a global organization. While we intend to continue to explore opportunities to expand our business in international markets in which we see compelling opportunities, we may not be able to create or maintain international market demand for our devices and streaming platform services. Moreover, we face intense competition in international markets, especially because some of our
26


competitors have already successfully introduced their products into new markets we are entering and have greater experience managing a global organization.
In the course of expanding our international operations, we are subject to a variety of risks that could adversely affect our business, including:
differing legal and regulatory requirements in foreign jurisdictions, including country-specific laws and regulations pertaining to data privacy and data security, consumer protection, tax, telecommunications, trade (including tariffs, quotas, and sanctions), labor, environmental protection, censorship and other content restrictions, and local content and advertising requirements, among others;
compliance with laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, UK Bribery Act, and other anti-corruption laws, U.S. or foreign export controls and sanctions, and local laws prohibiting improper payments to government officials and requiring the maintenance of accurate books and records and a system of sufficient internal controls;
slower consumer adoption and acceptance of streaming devices and services in other countries;
different or unique competitive pressures as a result of, among other things, competition with other devices that consumers may use to stream TV or existing local traditional pay and over-the-air TV services and products, including those provided by incumbent TV service providers and local consumer electronics companies;
greater difficulty supporting and localizing our streaming devices and streaming platform, including delivering support and training documentation in languages other than English;
our ability to deliver or provide access to popular streaming channels or content to users in certain international markets;
availability of reliable broadband connectivity in areas targeted for expansion;
challenges and costs associated with staffing and managing foreign operations;
differing legal and court systems, including limited or unfavorable intellectual property protection;
unstable political and economic conditions, social unrest or economic instability, whatever the cause, including due to pandemics, natural disasters, wars, terrorist activity, foreign invasions (such as the potential Russian invasion of Ukraine), tariffs, trade disputes, local or global recessions, diplomatic or economic tensions, long-term environmental risks, or climate change;
adverse tax consequences, such as those related to changes in tax laws (including increased tax rates, the imposition of digital services taxes, and the adoption of global corporate minimum taxes and anti-base-erosion rules), changes in the interpretation of existing tax laws, and the heightened scrutiny by tax administrators of companies that have cross-border business activities;
the imposition of customs duties on cross-border data flows for streaming services, in the event that the World Trade Organization fails to extend the current moratorium on such duties;
the COVID-19 pandemic or any other pandemics or epidemics, which could result in decreased economic activity in certain markets, decreased use of our products or platform, or decreased ability to import, export, ship, or sell our products to supply such services to existing or new customers in international markets;
inflationary pressures, such as those the global market is currently experiencing, which may increase costs for materials, supplies, and services;
fluctuations in currency exchange rates, which could impact the revenue and expenses of our international operations and expose us to foreign currency exchange rate risk;
restrictions on the repatriation of earnings from certain jurisdictions; and
working capital constraints.
If we invest substantial time and resources to expand our international operations and are unable to do so successfully and in a timely manner, our business and financial condition may be harmed.
Our revenue and gross profit are subject to seasonality, and if our sales during the holiday season fall below our expectations, our business may be harmed.
Seasonal consumer shopping patterns significantly affect our business. Specifically, our revenue and gross profit are traditionally strongest in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and represent a high percentage of the total net revenue for such fiscal year due to higher consumer purchases and increased advertising during holiday seasons. Furthermore, in preparation for the fourth quarter holiday season, we recognize significant discounts in the average selling prices of our player sales through retailers in an effort to grow our active accounts, which typically reduce our player gross margin in the fourth quarter.
Given the seasonal nature of advertising and our device sales, accurate forecasting is critical to our operations. We anticipate that this seasonal impact on revenue and gross profit is likely to continue, and any shortfall in expected fourth quarter revenue due to a decline in the effectiveness of our promotional activities, actions by our competitors, disruptions in our supply or distribution chains, tariffs or other restrictions on trade, shipping or air freight delays, or for any other reason,
27


would cause our full year results of operations to suffer significantly. For example, delays or disruptions at U.S. ports of entry have in the past, and may in the future, adversely affect our or our distributors’ ability to timely deliver players and Roku TV models to retailers during holiday seasons. A substantial portion of our expenses are personnel-related (including salaries, stock-based compensation, and benefits) and facilities-related, none of which are seasonal in nature. Accordingly, in the event of a revenue shortfall, we would be unable to mitigate the negative impact on gross profit and operating margins, at least in the short term, and our business would be harmed.
If we fail to attract and retain key personnel, effectively manage succession, or hire, develop, and motivate our employees, we may not be able to execute our business strategy or continue to grow our business.
Our success depends in large part on our ability to attract and retain key personnel on our senior management team and in our engineering, research and development, sales and marketing, operations, and other organizations. In particular, our founder, President and Chief Executive Officer, Anthony Wood, is critical to our overall management, as well as the continued development of our devices and streaming platform, our culture, and our strategic direction. We do not have long-term employment or non-competition agreements with any of our key personnel. The loss of one or more of our executive officers or the inability to promptly identify a suitable successor to a key role could have an adverse effect on our business.
Our ability to compete and grow depends in large part on the efforts and talents of our employees. Labor is subject to external factors that are beyond our control, including our industry’s highly competitive market for skilled workers and leaders, cost inflation, the COVID-19 pandemic, and workforce participation rates. Our employees, particularly engineers and other product developers, are in high demand, and we devote significant resources to identifying, hiring, training, successfully integrating, and retaining these employees. Because we face significant competition to attract top talent, we have had to offer, and believe we will need to continue to offer, competitive compensation packages before we can validate the productivity of those employees. In addition, the recent move by companies to offer a remote or hybrid work environment may increase the competition for such employees from employers outside of our traditional office locations. To retain employees, we also may need to increase our employee compensation levels in response to competition. The loss of employees or the inability to hire additional skilled employees necessary to support our growth could result in significant disruptions to our business, and the integration of replacement personnel could be time-consuming and expensive and cause disruptions.
We believe a critical component to our success and our ability to retain our best people is our culture. As we continue to grow, we may find it difficult to maintain our entrepreneurial, execution-focused culture. In addition, many of our employees may be able to receive significant proceeds from sales of our equity in the public markets, which may reduce their motivation to continue to work for us. Moreover, the equity ownership of many of our employees could create disparities in wealth among our employees, which may harm our culture and relations among employees and our business.
We need to maintain operational and financial systems that can support our expected growth, increasingly complex business arrangements, and rules governing revenue and expense recognition, and any inability or failure to do so could adversely affect our financial reporting, billing, and payment services.
We have a complex business that is growing in size and complexity both in the United States and in international jurisdictions. To manage our growth and our increasingly complex business operations, especially as we move into new markets internationally or acquire new businesses, we will need to maintain and may need to upgrade our operational and financial systems and procedures, which requires management time and may result in significant additional expense. Our business arrangements with our content partners, advertisers, Roku TV brand partners, and other licensees, and the rules that govern revenue and expense recognition in our business, are increasingly complex. To manage the expected growth of our operations and increasing complexity, we must maintain operational and financial systems, procedures, and controls and continue to increase systems automation to reduce reliance on manual operations. An inability to do so will negatively affect our financial reporting, billing, and payment services. Our current and planned systems, procedures, and controls may not be adequate to support our complex arrangements and the rules governing revenue and expense recognition for our future operations and expected growth. Delays or problems associated with any improvement or expansion of our operational and financial systems and controls could adversely affect our relationships with our users, content publishers, advertisers, advertisement agencies, Roku TV brand partners, or other licensees; cause harm to our reputation and brand; and result in errors in our financial and other reporting.
We may pursue acquisitions, which involve a number of risks, and if we are unable to address and resolve these risks successfully, such acquisitions could harm our business.
We have in the past and may in the future acquire businesses, products, or technologies to expand our offerings and capabilities, user base, and business. We have evaluated, and expect to continue to evaluate, a wide array of potential strategic transactions; however, we have limited experience completing or integrating acquisitions. Any acquisition could
28


be material to our financial condition and results of operations, and any anticipated benefits from an acquisition may never materialize. Acquisitions could also result in dilutive issuances of equity securities or the incurrence of debt, which could adversely affect our operating results, may cause unfavorable accounting treatment, may expose us to claims and disputes by third parties, including intellectual property claims, and may not generate sufficient financial returns to offset additional costs and expenses related to the acquisitions. In addition, the process of integrating acquired businesses, products, or technologies may create unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures, in particular when the acquired businesses, products, or technologies involve areas of operation in which we have limited or no prior experience. Acquisitions of businesses, products, or technologies in international markets would involve additional risks, including those related to integration of operations across different cultures and languages, currency risks, and the particular economic, political, and regulatory risks associated with specific countries. We may not be able to address these risks successfully, or at all, without incurring significant costs, delays, or other operational problems, and if we were unable to address such risks successfully, our business could be harmed.
We have outstanding debt, and our credit facility provides our lender with a first-priority lien against substantially all of our assets and contains financial covenants and other restrictions on our actions that may limit our operational flexibility or otherwise adversely affect our financial condition.
We entered into a credit agreement, dated February 9, 2019 (as amended on May 3, 2019, the “Credit Agreement”) among us, as borrower, certain of our subsidiaries from time to time party thereto, as guarantors, the lenders and issuing banks from time to time party thereto, and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as administrative agent and collateral agent (the “Agent”), providing for (i) a four-year revolving credit facility in the aggregate principal amount of up to $100.0 million (the “Revolving Credit Facility”), (ii) a four-year delayed draw term loan A facility in the aggregate principal amount of up to $100.0 million (the “Term Loan A Facility”), and (iii) an uncommitted incremental facility subject to certain conditions. The Credit Agreement contains a number of affirmative and negative covenants, which may restrict our current and future operations, particularly our ability to respond to certain changes in our business or industry or take future actions. The Credit Agreement also contains a financial covenant requiring us to maintain a minimum adjusted quick ratio of at least 1.00 to 1.00, tested as of the last day of any fiscal quarter on the basis of the prior period of our four consecutive fiscal quarters. Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, we granted the Agent a security interest in substantially all of our and our subsidiary guarantors’ assets. In November 2019, we borrowed an aggregate principal amount of $100.0 million from the Term Loan A Facility. We also had outstanding letters of credit as of December 31, 2021, totaling $38.0 million against the Revolving Credit Facility. See the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Senior Secured Term Loan A and Revolving Credit Facilities” elsewhere in this Annual Report.
As of December 31, 2021, we were in compliance with all of the covenants of the Credit Agreement. However, if we fail to comply with the covenants, make payments as specified in the Credit Agreement, or undergo any other event of default contained in the Credit Agreement, the Agent could declare an event of default, which would give it the right to terminate the commitments to provide additional loans and declare any borrowings outstanding, together with accrued and unpaid interest and fees, to be immediately due and payable. In addition, the Agent would have the right to proceed against the assets we provided as collateral pursuant to the Credit Agreement. If the outstanding debt under the Credit Agreement is accelerated, we may not have sufficient cash or be able to sell sufficient assets to repay it, which would harm our business and financial condition.
When we borrowed pursuant to the Term Loan A Facility, we chose a variable interest rate based on the one-month U.S. dollar London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) as the benchmark for establishing the applicable interest rate. If we borrow pursuant to the Revolving Credit Facility, we are permitted to choose LIBOR as the benchmark for establishing the applicable interest rate as well. LIBOR, which is calculated and published for various currencies and periods by the ICE Benchmark Administration Limited (“IBA”), is in the process of being phased out. The IBA has ceased publication of the one-week and two-month U.S. dollar LIBOR settings, and intends to cease publication of all other U.S. dollar LIBOR settings (including the one-month setting) after June 30, 2023. Accordingly, in the near future LIBOR will cease being a widely used benchmark interest rate. The current and any future reforms and other pressures may cause LIBOR to be replaced with a new benchmark or to perform differently than in the past, including during the transition period. Although our Credit Agreement will expire in February 2023 (before the cessation of the publication of the one-month U.S. dollar LIBOR setting), the consequences of the LIBOR developments cannot be entirely predicted and could have an adverse impact on the value of our LIBOR-linked financial obligations, such as an increase in the cost of our Credit Agreement indebtedness.
We may require additional capital to meet our financial obligations and support planned business growth, and this capital might not be available on acceptable terms or at all.
We intend to continue to make significant investments to support planned business growth and may require additional funds to respond to business challenges, including the need to develop new devices and enhance our streaming
29


platform, continue to expand the content on our platform, maintain adequate levels of inventory to support our retail partners’ demand requirements, improve our operating infrastructure, or acquire complementary businesses, personnel, and technologies. Our primary uses of cash include operating costs such as personnel-related expenses and capital spending. Our future capital requirements may vary materially from those currently planned and will depend on many factors including our growth rate and the continuing market acceptance of our streaming platform, the Roku OS, and players, along with the timing and effort related to the introduction of new platform features, players, hiring of experienced personnel, the expansion of sales and marketing activities, as well as overall economic conditions.
We may need to engage in equity or debt financings to secure additional funds. If we raise additional funds through future issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, our then existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences, and privileges superior to those of holders of our Class A common stock. Any debt financing we secure could involve additional restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities, including potential acquisitions. If we were to violate such restrictive covenants, we could incur penalties, increased expenses, and an acceleration of the payment terms of our outstanding debt, which could in turn harm our business.
We may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us, if at all. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us when we require it, our ability to continue to support our business growth and to respond to business challenges could be significantly impaired, and our business may be harmed.
Risks Related to Cybersecurity, Reliability, and Data Privacy
Significant disruptions of our information technology systems or data security incidents could harm our reputation, cause us to modify our business practices, and otherwise adversely affect our business and subject us to liability.
We are dependent on information technology systems and infrastructure to operate our business. In the ordinary course of our business, we collect, store, process, and transmit large amounts of sensitive corporate, personal, and other information, including intellectual property, proprietary business information, user payment card information, other user information, employee information, and other confidential information. It is critical that we do so in a secure manner to maintain the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of such information. Our obligations under applicable laws, regulations, contracts, industry standards, self-certifications, and other documentation may include maintaining the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of personal information in our possession or control, maintaining reasonable and appropriate security safeguards as part of an information security program, and limits on the use or cross-border transfer of such personal information. These obligations create potential legal liability to regulators, our business partners, our users, and other relevant stakeholders and impact the attractiveness of our subscription service to existing and potential users.
We have outsourced certain elements of our operations (including elements of our information technology infrastructure) to third parties, or may have incorporated technology into our platform, that collects, processes, transmits, and stores our users’ or others’ personal information (such as payment card information), and as a result, we manage a number of third-party vendors and other partners who may or could have access to our information technology systems (including our computer networks) or to our confidential information. In addition, many of those third parties in turn subcontract or outsource some of their responsibilities to third parties. As a result, our information technology systems, including the functions of third parties that are involved in or have access to those systems, are very large and complex. While all information technology operations are inherently vulnerable to inadvertent or intentional security breaches, incidents, attacks, and exposures, the size, complexity, accessibility, and distributed nature of our information technology systems, and the large amounts of sensitive or personal information stored on those systems, make such systems vulnerable to unintentional or malicious, internal, and external threats on our technology environment. Vulnerabilities can be exploited from inadvertent or intentional actions of our employees, third-party vendors, business partners, or by malicious third parties. For example, despite our efforts to secure our information technology systems and the data contained in those systems, including our efforts to educate or train our employees, we and our third-party vendors have experienced, and remain vulnerable to, data security incidents, including data breaches, phishing attacks, and improper employee access of confidential data. Malicious attacks are increasing in their frequency, levels of persistence, sophistication and intensity, and are being conducted by sophisticated and organized groups and individuals with a wide range of motives (including, but not limited to, industrial espionage) and expertise, including organized criminal groups, “hacktivists,” nation states, and others.
Although we have implemented work from home protocols and offer work-issued devices to employees, the actions of our employees while working from home may have a greater effect on the security of our systems and the data we process, including by increasing the risk of compromise to our systems, intellectual property, or data arising from employees’ combined personal and private use of devices, accessing our systems or data using wireless networks that we
30


do not control, or the ability to transmit or store company-controlled data outside of our secured network. These risks have been heightened by the dramatic increase in the numbers of our employees who have been and are continuing to work from home as a result of government guidelines and internal policies adopted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
In addition to the threat of unauthorized access or acquisition of sensitive or personal information or intellectual property, other threats include the deployment of harmful malware, ransomware attacks, denial-of-service attacks, social engineering, and other means to affect service reliability and threaten the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information. Some of these external threats may be amplified by the nature of our third-party web hosting, cloud computing, or network-dependent streaming services or suppliers. Our systems regularly experience directed attacks that are intended to interrupt our operations; interrupt our users’, content publishers’, and advertisers’ ability to access our platform; extract money from us; or view or obtain our data (including without limitation user or employee personal information or proprietary information) or intellectual property. We cannot be certain that threat actors will not have a material impact on our systems or services in the future. Our safeguards intended to prevent or mitigate certain threats may not be sufficient to protect our information technology systems and data due to the developing sophistication and means of attack in the threat landscape as well as the impact that third-party vendors and third-party products may have on our cybersecurity. Recent developments in the threat landscape include an increased number of cyber extortion and ransomware attacks, with increases in the amount of ransom demands and the sophistication and variety of ransomware techniques and methodology. Ransomware or other cybersecurity attacks affecting our third-party vendors also may impact our ability to operate our business, such as when our information technology or human resources vendors experience an outage of their systems, which renders services to downstream customers unavailable. Additionally, our third-party vendors or business partners’ information technology systems, or hardware/software provided by such third parties for use in our information technology systems, may be vulnerable to similar threats and our business could be affected by those or similar third-party relationships. Open source software, which may be incorporated into our systems or products, inherently presents a large attack surface and may contain vulnerabilities of which we are not aware and which we cannot control or fully mitigate. For example, the Apache Log4j vulnerability discovered in December 2021 can be exploited by remote code execution, which can allow a bad actor to steal data or take over our systems. We have taken steps to patch this vulnerability by updating our relevant Apache software, but we, and the many other affected organizations, remain vulnerable in light of the widespread use of the Apache Log4i library and difficulty in identifying all instances of this library across an entire enterprise.
We maintain insurance policies to cover certain losses relating to our information technology systems. However, there may be exceptions to our insurance coverage such that our insurance policies may not cover some or all aspects of a security incident. Insurance policies will also not protect against the reputational harms caused by a major security incident. Even where an incident is covered by our insurance, the insurance limits may not cover the costs of complete remediation and redress that we may be faced with in the wake of a security incident. The successful assertion of one or more large claims against us that exceeds our available insurance coverage, or results in changes to our insurance policies (including premium increases or the imposition of large deductible or co-insurance requirements), could have an adverse effect on our business. In addition, we cannot be sure that our existing insurance coverage and coverage for errors and omissions will continue to be available on acceptable terms or that our insurers will not deny coverage as to any future claim. Though it is difficult to determine what harm may directly result from any specific interruption or breach, any failure to maintain performance, reliability, security, and availability of our network infrastructure to the satisfaction of our users, business partners, regulators, or other relevant stakeholders may harm our reputation and our ability to retain existing users and attract new users. Because of our prominence in the TV streaming industry, we believe we may be a particularly attractive target for threat actors. Any attempts by threat actors to disrupt our platform, our streaming devices, website, computer systems, or our mobile apps, if successful, could harm our business, subject us to liability, be expensive to remedy, cause harm to our systems and operations, and damage our reputation. Efforts to prevent threat actors from entering our computer systems or exploiting vulnerabilities in our devices are expensive to implement and may not be effective in detecting or preventing intrusion or vulnerabilities. Such unauthorized access to our data could damage our reputation and our business and could expose us to the risk of contractual damages, litigation, and regulatory fines and penalties that could harm our business. The risk of harm to our business caused by security incidents may also increase as we expand our product and service offerings and as we enter into new markets. Implementing, maintaining, and updating security safeguards requires substantial resources now and will likely be an increasing and substantial cost in the future.
Significant disruptions of our third-party vendors’ or commercial partners’ information technology systems or other similar data security incidents could adversely affect our business operations or result in the loss, misappropriation, or unauthorized access, use or disclosure of, or the prevention of access to, sensitive or personal information, which could harm our business. In addition, information technology system disruptions, whether from attacks on our technology environment or from computer viruses, natural disasters, terrorism, war, foreign invasions, and telecommunications and electrical failures, could result in a material disruption of our product development and our business operations.
There is no way of knowing with certainty whether we have experienced any data security incidents that have not been discovered. While we have no reason to believe that we have experienced a data security incident that we have not
31


discovered, attackers have become very sophisticated in the way they conceal their unauthorized access to systems, and many companies that have been attacked are not aware that they have been attacked. Any event that leads to unauthorized access, use, or disclosure of personal information, including but not limited to personal information regarding our users, could disrupt our business, harm our reputation, compel us to comply with applicable federal or state breach notification laws and foreign law equivalents, subject us to time consuming, distracting, and expensive litigation, regulatory investigation and oversight, mandatory corrective action, require us to verify the correctness of database contents, or otherwise subject us to liability under laws, regulations, and contractual obligations, including those that protect the privacy and security of personal information. This could result in increased costs to us and result in significant legal and financial exposure or reputational harm. For example, in the wake of a data breach involving payment card data, we may be subject to substantial penalties and related enforcement for failure to adhere to the technical or operational security requirements of the Payment Card Industry (“PCI”) Data Security Standards (“DSS”) imposed by the PCI Council to protect cardholder data. Penalties arising from PCI DSS enforcement are inherently uncertain as penalties may be imposed by various entities within the payment card processing chain without regard to any statutory or universally mandated framework. Such enforcement could threaten our relationship with our banks, card brands we do business with, and our third-party payment processors.
In addition, any actual or perceived failure by us, our vendors, or our business partners to comply with our privacy, confidentiality, or data security-related legal or other obligations to third parties, or any further security incidents or other unauthorized access events that result in the unauthorized access, release, or transfer of sensitive information (which could include personal information), may result in governmental investigations, enforcement actions, regulatory fines, litigation, or public statements against us by advocacy groups or others, and could cause third parties, including current and potential partners, to lose trust in us (including existing or potential users’ perceiving our platform, system, or networks as less desirable) or we could be subject to claims by third parties that we have breached our privacy- or confidentiality-related obligations, which could materially and adversely affect our business and prospects. There can be no assurance that the limitations of liability in our contracts would be enforceable or adequate or would otherwise protect us from liabilities or damages. Moreover, data security incidents and other inappropriate access can be difficult to detect, and any delay in identifying them may lead to increased harm of the type described above. While we have implemented security measures intended to protect our information technology systems and infrastructure, as well as the personal and proprietary information that we possess or control, there can be no assurance that such measures will successfully prevent service interruptions or further security incidents. Data protection laws around the world often require “reasonable,” “appropriate,” or “adequate” technical and organizational security measures, and the interpretation and application of those laws are often uncertain and evolving, and there can be no assurance that our security measures will be deemed adequate, appropriate, or reasonable by a regulator or court. Moreover, even security measures that are deemed appropriate, reasonable, or in accordance with applicable legal requirements may not be able to protect the information we maintain. In addition to potential fines, we could be subject to mandatory corrective action due to a data security incident, which could adversely affect our business operations and result in substantial costs and reputational harm.
We and our service providers collect, process, transmit, and store personal and confidential information, which creates legal obligations and exposes us to potential liability.
We collect, process, transmit, and store personal or confidential information about our users (and their devices), employees, and partners, and we rely on third-party service providers to collect, process, transmit, and store personal or confidential information of our users (including our users’ payment card data), employees, and partners. We collect such information from individuals located both in the United States and abroad and may store or process such information outside the country in which it was collected. Further, we, our service providers and our business partners use tracking technologies, including cookies, device identifiers, and related technologies, to help us manage and track our users’ interactions with our platform, devices, website, and partners’ content to deliver relevant advertising and personalized content for ourselves and on behalf of our partners on our devices.
We collect information about the interaction of users with our platform, devices, website, advertisements, and content publishers’ streaming channels. To deliver relevant advertisements effectively, we must successfully leverage this data, as well as data provided by third parties. Our ability to collect and use such data could be restricted by a number of factors, including users having the ability to refuse consent to or opt out from our, our service providers’, or our advertising partners’ collection and use of this data, restrictions imposed by advertisers, content publishers, licensors, and service providers, changes in technology, and developments in laws, regulations, and industry standards. For example, certain European Union (“EU”) laws and regulations prohibit access to or storage of information on a user’s device (such as cookies and similar technologies that we use for advertising) that is not “strictly necessary” to provide a user-requested service or used for the “sole purpose” of a transmission unless the user has provided consent, and users may choose not to provide this consent to collection of information which is used for advertising purposes. Additionally, certain device manufacturers or operating system providers may restrict the deployment of cookies and similar technologies, or otherwise restrict the collection of personal information through these or other tools, via our applications. Any restrictions on our
32


ability to collect or use data could harm our ability to grow our revenue, particularly our platform revenue which depends on engaging the relevant recipients of advertising campaigns.
Various federal, state, and foreign laws and regulations as well as industry standards and contractual obligations govern the collection, use, retention, protection, disclosure, cross-border transfer, localization, sharing, and security of the data we receive from and about our users, employees, and other individuals. The regulatory environment for the collection and use of personal information by device manufacturers, online service providers, content distributors, advertisers, and publishers is evolving in the United States and internationally. Privacy and consumer rights groups and government bodies (including the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), state attorneys general, the European Commission, European and UK data protection authorities, and the Brazilian national data protection authority), have increasingly scrutinized privacy issues with respect to devices that identify or are identifiable to a person (or household or device) and personal information collected through the internet, and we expect such scrutiny to continue to increase. The U.S. federal government, U.S. states, and foreign governments have enacted (or are considering) laws and regulations that could significantly restrict industry participants’ ability to collect, use, and share personal information, such as by regulating the level of consumer notice and consent required before a company can place cookies or other tracking technologies. For example, the EU General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) imposes detailed requirements related to the collection, storage, and use of personal information related to people located in the EU (or which is processed in the context of EU operations) and places new data protection obligations and restrictions on organizations, and may require us to make further changes to our policies and procedures in the future beyond what we have already done. In addition, in the wake of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the EU (“Brexit”), the United Kingdom has adopted a framework similar to the GDPR. The EU has recently confirmed that the UK data protection framework as being “adequate” to receive EU personal data. We are monitoring recent developments regarding amendments to the UK data protection framework and the impact this may have on our business.
We made changes to our data protection compliance program to prepare for the GDPR and will continue to monitor the implementation and evolution of data protection regulations, but if we are not compliant with GDPR or other data protection laws or regulations if and when implemented, we may be subject to significant fines and penalties (such as restrictions on personal information processing) and our business may be harmed. For example, under the GDPR, fines of up to 4% of the annual global revenue of a noncompliant company, as well as data processing restrictions, could be imposed for violation of certain of the GDPR’s requirements. Data protection laws continue to proliferate throughout the world and such laws likely apply to our business. For example, Brazil’s General Data Protection Law (“LGPD”) came into effect in August 2020. The LGPD bears many substantive similarities to the GDPR such as extra-territorial reach, enhanced privacy rights for individuals, data transfer restrictions, and mandatory breach notification obligations. It carries penalties of up to 2% of a company’s annual revenue in Brazil.
The U.S. data protection legal landscape also continues to evolve, with various states having enacted broad-based data privacy and protection legislation and with states and the federal government continuing to consider additional data privacy and protection legislation. The potential effects of this legislation are far-reaching and may require us to modify our data processing practices and policies and incur substantial costs and expenses in an effort to comply. For example, effective October 2019, Nevada amended its existing Security of Personal Information Law (“SPI Law”) to require, among other things, that certain businesses provide a designated request address to intake requests from consumers to opt out of the sale of their personal data. Effective January 2020, the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) gives California residents certain rights with respect to their personal information, such as rights to access, and require deletion of, their personal information, opt out of the sale of their personal information, and receive detailed information about how their personal information is used. The CCPA also provides for civil penalties for violations, as well as a private right of action for data breaches that may increase data breach litigation. The California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”), which becomes effective on January 1, 2023 (with a “look-back” to January 1, 2022), builds on the CCPA and among other things, requires the establishment of a dedicated agency to regulate consumer privacy issues. In 2021, Virginia and Colorado adopted laws introducing new privacy obligations for which we may need to take additional steps to comply. We are continuing to assess the impact of new and proposed data privacy and protection laws and proposed amendments to existing laws on our business. Such restrictions could, for example, limit our ability to supply targeted advertising and thus negatively impact our business.
In addition, each U.S. state and most U.S. territories, each EU member state, and the United Kingdom, as well as many other foreign nations, have passed laws requiring notification to regulatory authorities, affected users, or others within a specific timeframe when there has been a security breach involving, or other unauthorized access to or acquisition or disclosure of, certain personal information and impose additional obligations on companies. Additionally, our agreements with certain users or partners may require us to notify them in the event of a security breach. Such statutory and contractual disclosures are costly, could lead to negative publicity, may cause our users to lose confidence in the effectiveness of our security measures, and may require us to expend significant capital and other resources to respond to or alleviate problems caused by the actual or perceived security breach. Compliance with these obligations could delay or impede the development of new products and may cause reputational harm.
33


As part of our data protection compliance program, we have implemented data transfer mechanisms to provide for the transfer of personal information from the European Economic Area (the “EEA”) or the United Kingdom to the United States. However, there are certain unsettled legal issues regarding the adequacy of data transfers to the United States, the resolution of which may adversely affect our ability to transfer personal information from the EEA to the United States. On July 16, 2020, the European Court of Justice ruled the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield to be an invalid data transfer mechanism, confirmed that the Model Clauses remain valid, and left unaddressed some issues regarding supplementary measures that may need to be taken to support transfers. In 2021, the European Commission published updated versions of the Model Clauses, which must be incorporated into new and existing agreements within prescribed timeframes in order to continue to lawfully transfer personal information outside of the EEA. The United Kingdom is expected to publish final versions of its own Model Clauses in 2022. Updating agreements to incorporate these new Model Clauses for the EEA and United Kingdom may require significant time and resources to implement, including through adjusting our operations, conducting requisite data transfer assessments, and revising our contracts. In addition, cloud service providers upon which our services depend are experiencing heightened scrutiny from EU regulators, which may lead to significant shifts or unavailability of cloud services to transfer personal information outside the EU, which may significantly impact our costs or ability to operate. We continue to assess the available regulatory guidance, determinations, and enforcement actions from EU Data Protection Authorities and the U.S. Department of Commerce on international data transfer compliance for companies, including guidance on specific supplementary measures in addition to the Model Clauses as well as specific data sharing that may be deemed a cross-border transfer for which appropriate safeguards must be implemented. Our ability to continue to transfer personal information outside of the EU may become significantly more costly and may subject us to increased scrutiny and liability under the GDPR or other legal frameworks, and we may experience operating disruptions if we are unable to conduct these transfers in the future.
We will continue to review our business practices and may find it necessary or desirable to make changes to our personal information processing to cause our transfer and receipt of EEA residents’ personal information to conform to applicable European law. The regulation of data privacy in the EU continues to evolve, and it is not possible to predict the ultimate effect of evolving data protection regulation and implementation over time. Member states also have some flexibility to supplement the GDPR with their own laws and regulations and may apply stricter requirements for certain data processing activities.
In addition, some countries are considering or have enacted “data localization” laws requiring that user data regarding users in their respective countries be maintained, stored, or processed in their respective countries. Maintaining local data centers in individual countries could increase our operating costs significantly. We expect that, in addition to the “business as usual” costs of compliance, the evolving regulatory interpretation and enforcement of laws such as the GDPR and CCPA, as well as other domestic and foreign data protection laws, will lead to increased operational and compliance costs and will require us to continually monitor and, where necessary, make changes to our operations, policies, and procedures. Any failure or perceived failure to comply with privacy-related legal obligations, or any compromise of security of user data, may result in governmental enforcement actions, litigation, contractual indemnities, or public statements against us by consumer advocacy groups or others. In addition to potential liability, these events could harm our business.
We publish privacy policies, notices, and other documentation regarding our collection, processing, use, and disclosure of personal information, credit card information, and other confidential information. Although we endeavor to comply with our published policies, certifications, and documentation, we may at times fail to do so or may be perceived to have failed to do so. Moreover, despite our efforts, we may not be successful in achieving compliance if our employees, representatives, agents, vendors, or other third parties fail to comply with our published policies, certifications, and documentation. Such failures can subject us to potential international, local, state, and federal action if they are found to be deceptive, unfair, or misrepresentative of our actual practices.
We have incurred, and will continue to incur, expenses to comply with privacy and security standards and protocols imposed by law, regulation, industry standards, and contractual obligations. Increased regulation of data collection, use, and security practices, including self-regulation and industry standards, changes in existing laws, enactment of new laws, increased enforcement activity, and changes in interpretation of laws, could increase our cost of compliance and operation, limit our ability to grow our business, or otherwise harm our business.
Any significant disruption in our computer systems or those of third parties we utilize in our operations could result in a loss or degradation of service on our platform and could harm our business.

We rely on the expertise of our engineering and software development teams for the performance and operation of ourthe Roku OS, streaming platform, and computer systems. Service interruptions, errors in our software, or the unavailability of computer systems used in our operations could diminish the overall attractiveness of our devices and streaming platform to existing and potential users.users or otherwise disrupt our business. We utilize computer systems located either in our facilities or those of third-party server hosting providers and third-party Internet-basedinternet-based or cloud computing services. Although we
34


generally enter into service level agreements with these parties, we exercise no control over their operations, which makes us vulnerable to any errors, interruptions, or delays that they may experience. In the future, we may transition additional features of our services from our managed hosting systems to cloud computing services, which may require significant expenditures and engineering resources. If we are unable to manage such a transition effectively, we may experience a loss or degradation in services, operational delays, andor inefficiencies until the transition is complete. Upon the expiration or termination of any of our agreements with third-party vendors, we may not be able to replace their services in a timely manner or on terms and conditions, including service levels and cost, that are favorable to us, and a transition from one vendor to another vendor could subject us to operational delays and inefficiencies until the transition is complete. In addition, fires, floods, earthquakes, wars, foreign invasions, terrorist activity, power losses, telecommunications failures, break-ins, and similar events could damage these systems and hardware or cause them to fail completely. As we do not maintain entirely redundant systems, a disrupting event could result in prolonged downtime of our operations, products, or services and could adversely affect our business. Any disruption in the services provided by these vendors could have adverse impacts on our business reputation, customer relations, and operating results.

If any aspect of our computer systems or those of third parties we utilize in our operations fails, it may lead to downtime or slow processing time, either of which may harm the experience of our users. We have experienced, and may in the future experience, service disruptions, outages, and other performance problems due to a variety of factors, including infrastructure changes, human or software errors, and capacity constraints. We expect to continue to make significant investmentsinvest in our technology infrastructure to maintain and improve the user experience and platform performance. To the extent that we or our third-party service hosting providers do not effectively address capacity constraints, upgrade ouror patch systems as needed, and continually develop our technology and network architecture to accommodate increasingly complex services and functions, increasing numbers of users, and actual and anticipated changes in technology, our business may be harmed.

Our servers may be vulnerable to computer viruses, cyberattacks, break-ins or other security issues, which could lead to the loss, misuse or alteration of personal data or confidential information, and cause harm to our reputation and business and subject us to liability.

Our servers and those of the third parties we use in our operations may be vulnerable to computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions, which could lead to interruptions and delays in platform availability and operations, as well as the loss, misuse or theft of personal and identifying information of our users. We also rely on third-party contractors to collect, process, transmit and store personal information of our users, including our users’ credit card data. While we have implemented administrative, physical and electronic security measures to protect against reasonably foreseeable loss, misuse and alteration of personal data and confidential information (e.g., protected content or intellectual property), viruses, social engineering attacks, general hacking and cyberattacks on companies have increased in frequency and potential impact in recent years. We have faced these issues in the past, and will occur on our systems in the future and if any of these cyberattacks against us are successful, these may harm our reputation and business and subject us to potential liability despite reasonable precautions.


We maintain limited insurance policies to cover losses relating to our systems. Though it is difficult to determine what harm may directly result from any specific interruption or breach, any failure to maintain performance, reliability, security and availability of our network infrastructure to the satisfaction of our users may harm our reputation and our ability to retain existing users and attract new users. Because of our prominence in the TV streaming industry, we believe we may be a particularly attractive target for hackers. Our platform also incorporates licensed software from third-parties, including open source software, and we may also be vulnerable to attacks that focus on such third-party software. Any attempts by hackers to disrupt our platform, our devices, website, computer systems or our mobile apps, if successful, could harm our business, be expensive to remedy and damage our reputation. Efforts to prevent hackers from entering our computer systems or exploiting vulnerabilities in our devices are expensive to implement and may not be effective in detecting or preventing intrusion or vulnerabilities. Such unauthorized access to users’ data could damage our reputation and our business and could expose us of the risk to contractual damages, litigation and regulatory fines and penalties that could harm our business.

Changes in how network operators manage data that travel across their networks could harm our business.

Our business relies upon the ability of consumersour users to access high-quality streaming content through the Internet.internet. As a result, the growth of our business depends on our users’ ability to obtain low-cost,and maintain high-speed access to the Internet,internet at reasonable cost, which relies in part on theinternet service network operators’ continuing willingness to upgrade and maintain their equipment as needed to sustain a robust Internetinternet infrastructure as well as their continued willingness to preserve the open and interconnected nature of the Internet.internet. We exercise no control over network operators, which makes us vulnerable to any errors, interruptionsdisruptions, or delays in their operations.operations, as well as any decision they may make to prioritize the delivery of certain network traffic at the expense of other traffic. Any material disruption or degradation in Internetinternet services could harm our business.

To the extent that the number of Internetinternet users continues to increase, network congestion could adversely affect the reliability of our streaming platform. We may also face increased costs of doing business, or decreased demand for our services, if network operators engage in discriminatory practices with respect to streamed video content in an effort to monetize access to their networks or customers by data providers.
Certain laws intended to prevent network operators from engaging in discriminatory practices with respect to streaming video content have been implemented in many countries, including in the EU. In other countries, laws in this area may be nascent or non-existent. Furthermore, favorable laws may change. Given the past, ISPs have attempted touncertainty around these laws and the rules that implement them, including changing interpretations, amendments, or repeal, coupled with potentially significant political and economic power of network operators, we could experience discriminatory or anti-competitive practices, such as usage-based pricing, bandwidth caps, and traffic “shaping” or throttling. To the extent network operators were to create tiers of Internet access service and either charge us for access to these tiers or prohibitthrottling, that could impede our content offerings from being available on some or all of these tiers,growth, result in a decline in our quality of service, could decline, our operating expenses could increase andcause us to incur additional expense, or otherwise impair our ability to attract and retain customers could be impaired, eachusers, all of which wouldcould harm our business.

In addition, most network operators that provide consumers with access to the Internetinternet also provide theseoffer consumers with multichannel video programming.programming, and some network operators also own streaming services. These network operators have an incentive to use their network infrastructure in a manner adverse to the continued growth and success of other companies seeking to distribute similar video programming. To the extent that network operators are able to provide preferential treatment to their own data and content, as opposed to ours, our business could be harmed.

We could become subject

Risks Related to litigationIntellectual Property
Litigation regarding intellectual property rights that could be costly, result in the loss of rights important to our devices and streaming platform, cause us to incur significant legal costs, or otherwise harm our business.

Some Internet,internet, technology, and media companies, including some of our competitors, own large numbers of patents, copyrights, and trademarks, which they may use to assert claims against us. Third parties have asserted, and may in the future assert, that we have infringed, misappropriated, or otherwise violated their intellectual property rights. As we grow
35


and face increasing competition, the possibility of intellectual property rights claims against us will grow. Plaintiffs who have no relevant product revenue may not be deterred by our own issued patents and pending patent applications in bringing intellectual property rights claims against us. The cost of patent litigation or other proceedings, even if resolved in our favor, has been or could be substantial. Some of our competitors may be better able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings because of their substantially greater financial resources. Patent litigation and other proceedings may also require significant management time and divert management from our business. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could impair our ability to compete in the marketplace. The occurrence of any of the foregoing could harm our business.

As a result of intellectual property infringement claims, or to avoid potential claims, we may choose or be required to seek licenses from third parties. These licenses may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Even if we are able to obtain a license, the license would likely obligate us to pay license fees or royalties


or both, and the rights granted to us might be nonexclusive, with the potential for our competitors to gain access to the same intellectual property. In addition, the rights that we secure under intellectual property licenses may not include rights to all of the intellectual property owned or controlled by the licensor, and the scope of the licenses granted to us may not include rights covering all of the products and services provided by us and our licensees. Furthermore, an adverse outcome of a dispute may require us toto: pay damages, potentially including treble damages and attorneys’ fees, if we are found to have willfully infringed a party’s intellectual property; cease making, licensing, or using technologies that are alleged to infringe or misappropriate the intellectual property of others; expend additional development resources to redesign our solutions;products; enter into potentially unfavorable royalty or license agreements in order to obtain the right to use necessary technologies, content, or materials; and to indemnify our partners and other third parties. For example, we have in the past elected to develop and implement specific design changes to address potential risks that certain products could otherwise become subject to exclusion or cease and desist orders arising from patent infringement and other intellectual property claims brought in the U.S. International Trade Commission. In addition, any lawsuits regarding intellectual property rights, regardless of their success, could be expensive to resolve and would divert the time and attention of our management and technical personnel.

Under our agreements with many of our content publishers, licensees, contract manufacturer and suppliers, we are required to provide indemnification in the event our technology is alleged to infringe upon the intellectual property rights of third parties.

In certain of our agreements we indemnify our content publishers, licensees, manufacturing partners and suppliers. We could incur significant expenses defending these partners if they are sued for patent infringement based on allegations related to our technology. In addition, if a partner were to lose a lawsuit and in turn seek indemnification from us, we could be subject to significant monetary liabilities. In addition, because the devices sold by our licensing partners and TV brands often involve the use of third-party technology, this increases our exposure to litigation in circumstances where there is a claim of infringement asserted against the player in question, even if the claim does not pertain to our technology.

If we fail to, or are unable to, protect or enforce our intellectual property or proprietary rights, our business and operating results could be harmed.

We regard the protection of our patents, trade secrets, copyrights, trademarks, trade dress, domain names, and other intellectual property or proprietary rights as critical to our success. We strive to protect our intellectual property rights by relying on federal, state, and common law rights, as well as contractual restrictions. We seek to protect our confidential proprietary information, in part, by entering into confidentiality agreements and invention assignment agreements with all of our employees, consultants, contractors, advisors, and any third parties who have access to our proprietary know-how, information, or technology. However, we cannot be certain that we have executed such agreements with all parties who may have helped to develop our intellectual property or who had access to our proprietary information, nor can we be certain that our agreements will not be breached. Any party with whom we have executed such an agreement could potentially breach that agreement and disclose our proprietary information, including our trade secrets, and we may not be able to obtain adequate remedies for such breaches. We cannot guarantee that our trade secrets and other confidential proprietary information will not be disclosed or that competitors will not otherwise gain access to our trade secrets or independently develop substantially equivalent information and techniques. Detecting the disclosure or misappropriation of a trade secret and enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret is difficult, time-consuming, and could result in substantial costs, and the outcome of such a claim is unpredictable.
Further, the laws of certain foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights toprovide the same extent or in the same mannerlevel of protection of corporate proprietary information and assets such as intellectual property, trademarks, trade secrets, know-how, and records as the laws of the United States. For instance, the legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual property protection. As a result, we may encounter significant problems in protecting and defending our intellectual property or proprietary rights bothabroad. Additionally, we may also be exposed to material risks of theft or unauthorized reverse engineering of our proprietary information and other intellectual property, including technical data, manufacturing processes, data sets, or other sensitive information. Our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights in such foreign countries may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the United Statesintellectual property that we develop, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and abroad. Ifresults of operations. Moreover, if we are unable to prevent the disclosure of our trade secrets to third parties, or if our competitors independently develop any of our trade secrets, we may not be able to establish or maintain a competitive advantage in our market, which could harm our business.

We have filed and will in the future file patent applications on inventions that we deem to be innovative. There is no guarantee that our patent applications will issue as granted patents, that the scope of the protection gained will be sufficient or that an issued patent may subsequently be deemed invalid or unenforceable. PatentU.S. patent laws, and the scope of coverage afforded by them, have recently been subject to significant changes, such as the change to “first-to-file” from “first-to-invent” resulting from the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. This change in the determination of inventorship may result
36


in inventors and companies having to file patent applications more frequently to preserve rights in their inventions, which may favor larger competitors that have the resources to file


more patent applications. Another change to the patent laws may incentivize third parties to challenge any issued patent in the United States Patent and Trademark Office or USPTO,(“USPTO”), as opposed to having to bring such an action in U.S. federal court. Any invalidation of a patent claim could have a significant impact on our ability to protect the innovations contained within our devices and platform and could harm our business.

The USPTO and various foreign governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment, and other provisions to maintain patent applications and issued patents. We may fail to take the necessary actions and to pay the applicable fees to obtain or maintain our patents. Noncompliance with these requirements can result in abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. In such an event, competitors might be able to use our technologies and enter the market earlier than would otherwise have been the case.

We pursue the registration of our domain names, trademarks, and service marks in the United States and in certain locations outside the United States. We are seeking to protect our trademarks, patents, and domain names in an increasing number of jurisdictions, a process that is expensive and time-consuming and may not be successful or which we may not pursue in every location.

jurisdiction in which we conduct business. In particular, our actions to monitor and enforce our trademarks against third parties may not prevent counterfeit versions of our products or products bearing confusingly similar trademarks to ours from entering the marketplace, which could divert sales from us, tarnish our reputation, or reduce the demand for our products.

Litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property or proprietary rights, protect our trade secrets, or determine the validity and scope of proprietary rights claimed by others. Any litigation of this nature, regardless of outcome or merit, could result in substantial costs, adverse publicity, or diversion of management and technical resources, any of which could adversely affect our business and operating results. If we fail to maintain, protect, and enhance our intellectual property or proprietary rights, our business may be harmed.

We and our third -party contractors collect, process, transmit and store the personal information of our users, which creates legal obligations and exposes us to potential liability.

We collect, process, transmit and store information about our users’ device usage patterns, and rely on third-party contractors to collect, process, transmit and store personal information of our users, including our users’ credit card data. Further, we and third parties use tracking technologies, including cookies, device identifiers and related technologies, to help us manage and track our users’ interactions with our platform, devices, website and partners’ content streaming channels and deliver relevant advertising for ourselves and on behalf of our partners on our devices.

We collect information about the interaction of users with our devices, our advertisements, and our partners’ streaming channels. To deliver relevant advertisements effectively, we must successfully leverage this data as well as data provided by third parties.

Our ability to collect and use such data could be restricted by a number of factors, including consumers choosing to opt out from our collection of this data or the ability of our advertisers to use such data to provide more relevant advertisements, restrictions imposed by advertisers, content publishers and service providers, changes in technology, and new developments in laws, regulations and industry standards. For example, our privacy policy outlines the type of data we collect and discloses to users how to disable or restrict such data collection and the use of such data in providing more relevant advertisements. Any restrictionsopen source software could impose limitations on our ability to collect datacommercialize our devices and our streaming platform or could result in public disclosure of competitively sensitive trade secrets.
We incorporate open source software in our streaming platform. From time to time, companies that incorporate open source software into their products and services have faced claims challenging the ownership of open source software or compliance with open source license terms. Therefore, we could be subject to suits by parties claiming ownership of what we believe to be open source software or noncompliance with open source licensing terms. Although we have processes and procedures designed to help monitor our use of open source software, these processes and procedures may not be followed by all of our employees or may fail to identify risks. Additionally, the terms of many open source software licenses have not been interpreted by U.S. courts, and there is a risk that such licenses could be construed in a manner that could impose unanticipated conditions or restrictions on the sale of our devices or impose unanticipated obligations that require disclosure of trade secrets. In such event, we could be required to make our proprietary software generally available to third parties, including competitors, at no cost, to seek licenses from third parties in order to continue offering our devices, to re-engineer our devices, or to discontinue the sale of our devices in the event re-engineering cannot be accomplished on a timely basis or at all, any of which could harm our abilitybusiness.
Under our agreements with many of our content publishers, licensees, distributors, retailers, contract manufacturers, and suppliers, we are required to growprovide indemnification in the event our revenue, particularlytechnology is alleged to infringe upon the intellectual property rights of third parties.
In certain of our advertising revenue which dependsagreements we indemnify our content publishers, licensees, distributors, retailers, manufacturing partners, and suppliers. We have in the past, and may in the future, incur significant expenses defending these partners if they are sued for patent infringement based on engagingallegations related to our technology. If a partner were to lose a lawsuit and in turn seek indemnification from us, we also could be subject to significant monetary liabilities. In addition, because the relevant recipients of advertising campaigns.

Various federaldevices sold by our licensing partners and state laws and regulations governRoku TV brand partners often involve the collection, use, retention, sharing and security of the data we receive from and about our users. The regulatory environment for the collection and use of consumer data bythird-party technology, this increases our exposure to litigation in circumstances where there is a claim of infringement asserted against the streaming device manufacturers, online service providers, content distributors, advertisersin question, even if the claim does not pertain to our technology. Liability under our indemnification commitments may not be contractually limited.

37


Risks Related to Macroeconomic Conditions
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has impacted and publisherscontinues to pose risks to our business, the nature and extent of which are highly uncertain and unpredictable.
Our business has been, and is very unsettled in the United States and internationally. Privacy groups and government bodies, including the Federal Trade Commission, have increasingly scrutinized privacy issues with respect to devices that link personal identities or user and device data, with data collected through the Internet, and we expect such scrutinyexpected to continue to increase.be, impacted by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and resulting economic consequences. The United Statesspread of COVID-19 has caused us to take precautionary measures intended to help minimize the risk of the virus to our employees, including work from home policies, suspending certain business travel, and foreign governmentslimiting physical participation in meetings, events, and conferences. We may take further actions as required by government authorities or that we determine are in the best interests of our employees, TV brand partners, content publishers, advertisers, retail and distribution partners, contract manufacturers, services vendors, and supply chain. There is no certainty that such measures will be sufficient to mitigate the risks posed by the COVID-19 pandemic.
The COVID-19 pandemic continued to have enacteda mixed impact on our business in 2021. When staying-at-home restrictions were first issued in the first quarter of 2020, we saw an acceleration in both streaming hours and are considering regulationsaccount activations, which have both since moderated as restrictions have lifted and we believe consumers have increasingly pursued out-of-home entertainment activities. Although we believe the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the shift of advertising from legacy TV to streaming TV, certain advertisers with businesses affected by the current global supply chain disruptions have reduced and may continue to reduce their spending on advertising. We also have encountered supply chain disruptions related to our players that have resulted in an increase in component prices and elevated air freight costs to replenish inventory and meet increased demand, and some of our TV brand partners have faced inventory challenges that have negatively impacted their unit sales, which we believe has affected and could significantly restrict industry participants’ abilitycontinue to collect,affect our streaming hours and active account growth. Additionally, at times during the pandemic some of our retail partners have had to close or severely limit access to their brick and mortar locations, resulting in reduced sale of devices in these locations.
We continue to monitor the situation and take appropriate actions in accordance with the recommendations and requirements of relevant authorities. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic may impact our operational and financial performance remains uncertain and will depend on many factors outside our control, including the timing, extent, trajectory, and duration of the pandemic; the emergence infectiousness, and severity of new variants; the development, availability, distribution, acceptance, use, and share personal informationeffectiveness of vaccines, vaccine boosters, and pseudonymous data, such as by regulatingtreatments; the levelimposition of consumer noticeprotective public safety measures; the resolution of global supply chain disruptions; and consent required before a company can place cookies or other tracking technologies. Some countries are considering or have enacted laws requiring that user data regarding users in their country be maintained in their country. Maintaining local data centers in individual countries could increase our operating costs significantly. In addition, the General Data Protection Regulation, which has been finalized and will be implemented by the member statesimpact of the European Union in May 2018, includes operationalpandemic on the global economy and compliance


requirements thatdemand for consumer products. Additional future impacts on our business may include, but are different than those currently in placenot limited to, material adverse effects on demand for our products and that also includes significant penalties for non-compliance.  Any failure or perceived failure to comply with privacy-related legal obligations, or any compromise of security of user data, may result in governmental enforcement actions, litigation, contractual indemnity or public statements against us by consumer advocacy groups or others. In addition to potential liability, these events could harmservices, our business.

We have incurred,supply chain and will continue to incur, expenses to comply with privacysales and security standards and protocols imposed by law, regulation, industry standards and contractual obligations. Increased regulation of data collection, use and security practices, including self-regulation and industry standards, changes in existing laws, enactment of new laws, increased enforcement activity, and changes in interpretation of laws, could increase our cost of compliance and operation, limitdistribution channels, our ability to growexecute our strategic plans, and our profitability and cost structure.

To the extent the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects our business, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in this Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report.
Natural disasters or otherwise harmother catastrophic events could disrupt and impact our business.

Occurrence of any catastrophic event, including an earthquake, flood, tsunami, or other weather event, power loss, internet failure, software or hardware malfunctions, cyber attack, war or foreign invasion (such as the potential Russian invasion of Ukraine), terrorist attack, medical epidemic or pandemic (such as the COVID-19 pandemic), other man-made disasters, or other catastrophic events could disrupt our business operations. Any of these business disruptions could require substantial expenditures and recovery time in order to fully resume operations. In particular, our principal offices are located in California, and our contract manufacturers and some of our suppliers are located in Asia, both of which are regions known for seismic activity, making our operations in these areas vulnerable to natural disasters or other business disruptions in these areas. Our insurance coverage may not compensate us for losses that may occur in the event of an earthquake or other significant natural disaster. In addition, our offices and facilities, and those of our contract manufacturers, suppliers, and TV brand partners, could be vulnerable to the effects of climate change (such as sea level rise, drought, flooding, wildfires, and increased storm severity) that could disrupt our business operations. For example, in California, increasing intensity of drought and annual periods of wildfire danger increase the probability of planned power outages. Further, acts of terrorism could cause disruptions to the internet or the economy as a whole. If service operators refuseour streaming platform was to authenticatefail or be negatively impacted as a result of a natural disaster or other event, our ability to deliver streaming channels on our platform,content, including advertising, to our users maywould be restricted from accessing certain content onimpaired. Disruptions in the operations of our platformcontract manufacturers, suppliers, or TV brand partners as a result of a disaster or other catastrophic event could delay the manufacture and shipment of our business may be harmed.

Certain service operators, including payproducts or Roku TV providers, have from time to time refused to grantmodels, which could impact our users access to streaming content through “TV Everywhere” channels and have made that content available only on certain devices favored by such service operators, including devices offered by that service operator or its partners. If major service operators do not authenticate popular TV Everywhere channels on our platform, we may be unable to offer a broad selection of popular streaming channels and consumers may not purchase or use our streaming players.business. If we are unable to develop adequate plans to ensure that our business functions continue to provide access to popular streaming channels on our platform, our business may be harmed.

United Statesoperate during and after a disaster or international rules that permit ISPs to limit Internet data consumption by users, including unreasonable discrimination in the provision of broadband Internet access services, could harm our business.

Laws, regulations or court rulings that adversely affect the popularity or growth in use of the Internet, including decisions that undermine open and neutrally administered Internet access, could decrease customer demand for our service offerings, may impose additional burdens on us or could cause us to incur additional expenses or alter our business model.

On February 26, 2015, the FCC adopted open Internet rules intended to protect the ability of consumers and content producers to send and receive non-harmful, lawful information on the Internet. The FCC’s Open Internet Order prohibited broadband Internet access service providers from: (i) blocking access to legal content, applications, services or non-harmful devices; (ii) throttling, impairing or degrading performance based on content, applications, services or non-harmful devices; and (iii) charging more for favorable delivery of content or favoring self-provisioned content over third-party content. The Open Internet Order also prohibited broadband Internet access service providers from unreasonably interfering with consumers’ ability to select, access and use the lawful content, applications, services or devices of their choosing as well as edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services or devices available to consumers.  On June 14, 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the Open Internet Order against a challenge by twelve parties.  Several parties, including AT&T Inc., the American Cable Association, CenturyLink, CTIA, the National Cable & Telecommunications Association and the United States Telecom Association, petitioned the United States Supreme Court for certiorari on September 28, 2017.  The Supreme Court has not resolved these petitions as of this date.

On June 14, 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the Open Internet Order against a challenge by twelve parties, including AT&T Inc., the United States Telecom Association and the National Cable & Telecommunications Association. On May 1, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied rehearing en banc. Multiple parties subsequently petitioned for certiorari asking the Supreme Court of the United States to further review the Open Internet Order. In the interim, the FCC issued a notice of proposed rulemaking on May 18, 2017 that proposes to limit or reverse some of the provisions of the Open Internet Order, including its prohibitions against blocking, throttling and paid prioritization. It is not clear whetherother catastrophic event and to what extent the Supreme Court will grant certiorari in light of the proposed rulemaking. To the extent the Supreme Court or the FCC do not uphold or adopt sufficient safeguards to protect against discriminatory conduct orexecute successfully on those plans in the event that any existingof a disaster or future rules fail to offer protections against such conduct, network operators may seek to extract fees from us or our content publishers to deliver our traffic or otherwise engage in blocking, throttling or other discriminatory practices, andcatastrophic event, our business couldwould be harmed.


38

On January 4, 2018, the FCC released an order (“Restoring Internet Freedom Order”) that repeals most of the rules adopted in the Open Internet Order. The Restoring Internet Freedom Order reclassifies broadband Internet access service as a non-common carrier “information service”



Legal and repeals rules that had prohibited broadband Internet access service providers from: (i) blocking access to legal content, applications, services or non-harmful devices; (ii) throttling, impairing or degrading performance based on content, applications, services or non-harmful devices; and (iii) charging more for favorable delivery of content or favoring self-provisioned content over third-party content. The Restoring Internet Freedom Order continues to require Internet service providers to be transparent about their policies and network management practices, and subjects discriminatory practices to case-by-case assessment under antitrust and consumer protection laws. The Restoring Internet Freedom Order has not gone into effect as of this date, and it is expected to be subject to additional judicial and executive branch review.  To the extent the courts or the agencies do not uphold or adopt sufficient safeguards to protect against discriminatory conduct, network operators may seek to extract fees from us or our content publishers to deliver our traffic or otherwise engage in blocking, throttling or other discriminatory practices, and our business could be harmed.

As we expand internationally, government regulation protecting the non-discriminatory provision of Internet access may be nascent or non-existent. In those markets where regulatory safeguards against unreasonable discrimination are nascent or non-existent and where local network operators possess substantial market power, we could experience anti-competitive practices that could impede our growth, cause us to incur additional expenses or otherwise harm our business. Future regulations or changes in laws and regulations or their existing interpretations or applications could also hinder our operational flexibility, raise compliance costs and result in additional liabilities for us, which may harm our business.

Broadband Internet providers are subject to government regulation, and changes in current or future laws or regulations that negatively impact our content publishers could harm our business.

The FCC exercises jurisdiction over many broadband Internet providers in the United States. The FCC could promulgate new regulations or interpret existing regulations in a manner that would cause us or our content publishers to incur significant compliance costs or force us to alter or eliminate certain features or functionality of our products or services which may harm our business. Future FCC regulation affecting providers of broadband Internet access services could impede the penetration of broadband Internet access into certain markets or affect the prices they may charge in such markets. Furthermore, many broadband Internet providers provide traditional telecommunications services that are subject to FCC and state rate regulation of interstate telecommunications services, and are recipients of federal universal service fund payments, which are intended to subsidize telecommunications services in areas that are expensive to serve. Changes in rate regulations or in universal service funding rules, either at the federal or state level, could adversely affect these broadband Internet providers’ revenue and capital spending plans. In addition, various international regulatory bodies have jurisdiction over non-United States broadband Internet providers. To the extent these broadband Internet providers are adversely affected by laws or regulations regarding their business, products or service offerings, our business could be harmed.

Regulatory Risks

If government regulations or laws relating to the Internet,internet, video, advertising, or other areas of our business change, we may need to alter the manner in which we conduct our business, or our business could be harmed.

We are subject to or affected by general business regulations and laws, as well as regulations and laws specific to the Internetinternet and online services, which may includeincluding laws and regulations related to data privacy and security, consumer protection, data localization, law enforcement access to data, encryption, telecommunications, social media, payment processing, taxation, trade, intellectual property, competition, electronic contracts, Internetinternet access, net neutrality, advertising, calling and texting, content restrictions, protection of children, and accessibility, among others. We cannot guarantee that we have been or will be fully compliant in every jurisdiction. Litigation and regulatory proceedings are inherently uncertain, and the federal, state, and foreign laws and regulations governing issues such as data privacy and security, payment processing, taxation, net neutrality, liability of providers of online services, video, telecommunications, e-commerce tariffs, and consumer protection related to the Internetinternet continue to develop. For example, laws relating to the liability of providers of online services for activities of their users and other third parties have been tested by a number of claims, including actions based on invasion of privacy and other torts, unfair competition, copyright and trademark infringement, and other theories based on the nature and content of the materials searched, the advertisements posted, actions taken or not taken by providers in response to user activity or the content provided by users. Moreover, as Internetinternet commerce and advertising continuescontinue to evolve, increasing regulation by federal, state, and foreign regulatory authorities becomes more likely.


As we develop new services and devices and improve our TV streaming platform, we may also be subject to new laws and regulations specific to such technologies. For example, in developing our Roku TV reference design, we were required to understand, address, and comply with an evolving regulatory framework for developing, manufacturing, marketing, and selling TVs. If we fail to adequately address or comply with such regulations regarding the manufacture and sale of TVs, we may be subject to fines or sanctions, and our licenseesTV brand partners may be unable to sell Roku TVsTV models at all, which wouldcould harm our business and our ability to grow our user base.

Laws relating to data privacy and security, data localization, law enforcement access to data, encryption, consumer protection, and similar activities continue to proliferate, often with little harmonization between jurisdictions and littlelimited guidance. A number of existing bills are pending in the U.S. Congress and other government bodies that contain provisions that would regulate, for example, how companies can use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect, use, and share user information. The European UnionCCPA also imposes requirements on certain tracking activity. The EU has already enacted laws requiring advertisers or companies like ours to, for example, obtain informedunambiguous, affirmative consent from users for the placement of cookies or other tracking technologies and the delivery of relevant advertisements. In addition, EU institutions continue to negotiate the draft of the proposed Digital Services Act, legislation intended to update the liability and safety rules for digital platforms, products, and services. If we or the third parties that we work with, such as contract payment processing services, content publishers, vendors, or developers, violate or are alleged to violate applicable privacy or security laws, industry standards, our contractual obligations, or our policies, such violations and alleged violations may also put our users’ information at risk and could in turn harm our business and reputation and subject us to potential liability. Any of these consequences could cause our users, advertisers, or publishers to lose trust in us, which could harm our business. Furthermore, any failure on our part to comply with these laws may subject us to liability and reputational harm.

Our use of data to deliver relevant advertising and other services on our platform places us and our content publishers at risk for claims under various unsettled laws, including the Video Privacy Protection Act or VPPA.(“VPPA”). Some of our content publishers have been engaged in litigation over alleged violations of the VPPA relating to activities on our platform in connection with advertising provided by unrelated third parties. The Federal Trade CommissionIn addition, the FTC has also revisedinitiated a review of its rules implementing the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act or COPPA Rules,(“COPPA”), which limits the collection by operators of online services of personal information from children under the age of 13. The review could result in broadening the applicability of the COPPA, Rules, including the types of information that are subject to these regulations, andregulations. Changes to the COPPA rules could limit the information that we or our content publishers and advertisers may collect and use through certain content publishers,and the content of advertisements and in relation to certain channel partner content. The CCPA also imposes certain opt in and opt out requirements before certain information about minors can be collected. We and our content publishers and advertisers could be at risk for violation or alleged violation of these and other privacy, advertising, or similar laws.

Changes in U.S. or foreign trade policies, geopolitical conditions, general economic conditions, and other factors beyond our control may adversely impact our business and operating results.
Our actualbusiness is subject to risks generally associated with doing business abroad, such as U.S. and foreign governmental regulation in the countries in which we operate and the countries in which our contract manufacturers, component suppliers, and other business partners are located. Our operations and performance depend significantly on global, regional, and U.S. economic and geopolitical conditions.
For example, tensions between the United States and China have led to the United States’ imposition of a series of tariffs, sanctions, and other restrictions on imports from China and sourcing from certain Chinese persons or perceived failureentities, as well as other business restrictions. These and other trade disputes can disrupt supply chains and increase the cost of our products and the components required to adequately protect personalmanufacture our products, as well as costs for our Roku TV brand partners. This
39


could cause our products and those of our Roku TV brand partners to be more expensive for consumers, which could reduce the demand for or attractiveness of such products. Countries also could adopt other measures, such as controls on imports or exports of goods, technology, or data, which could adversely affect our operations and confidential informationsupply chain and limit our ability to offer our products and services as intended. These kinds of restrictions could be adopted with little to no advanced notice, and we may not be able to effectively mitigate the adverse impacts from such measures. Political uncertainty surrounding trade or other international disputes also could have a negative impact on consumer confidence and willingness to spend money, which could impair our future growth. In particular, given the general deterioration in U.S.-China relations and ongoing tensions on trade, security. and human rights, additional U.S. sanctions, tariffs. and export or import restrictions, as well as Chinese sanctions or retaliatory measures, remain a serious risk.
We cannot predict whether new international trade agreements will be negotiated or existing free trade agreements renegotiated; whether new trade or tariff actions will be announced by the Biden Administration with other U.S. trading partners; or the effect that any such action would have, either positively or negatively, on our industry or our business or licensees. If any new legislation or regulations are implemented, or if existing trade agreements are renegotiated or terminated, or if tariffs are imposed on foreign-sourced or U.S. goods, it may be inefficient and expensive for us to alter our business operations in order to adapt to or comply with such changes, and higher prices could depress consumer demand. Such operational changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Also, various countries, in addition to the United States, regulate the import and export of certain products, commodities, software, and technology, including through import and export licensing requirements, and have enacted laws that could limit our ability to distribute our products or collaborate on technology with our commercial or strategic partners, or could limit the ability of our commercial or strategic partners to implement our products in those countries. Changes in our products or future changes in export and import regulations may create delays in the introduction of our products in international markets, disrupt supply chains, prevent our commercial or strategic partners with international operations from deploying our products globally, or, in some cases, prevent the export or import of our products to certain countries, governments, or persons altogether. Any changes in U.S. or foreign export or import regulations, customs duties, or other restrictions on intangible goods (such as cross-border data flows) could result in decreased use of our products by, or in our decreased ability to export or sell our products and services to, existing or new customers in U.S. or international markets or hamper our ability to source products, components, and parts from certain suppliers or lead to potential supply chain disruptions and business or reputational harms. Any decreased use of our products or limitation on our ability to export, import, or sell our products or services, or source parts or components, could harm our business.

A variety Although we attempt to ensure that we, our retailers, and partners comply with the applicable import, export, and sanctions laws, we cannot guarantee full compliance by all. Actions of state, national, foreign,our retailers and partners are not within our complete control, and our devices could be re-exported to sanctioned persons or countries, or provided by our retailers to third persons in contravention of our requirements or instructions or the laws. Any such potential violation could have negative consequences, including government investigations or penalties, and our reputation, brand, and revenue may be harmed.

Further, there are many uncertainties around the COVID-19 pandemic, including scientific and health issues, the pace of worldwide vaccinations, the unknown duration and extent of economic disruption, and the impact on the economies of various countries in which we operate or in which our contract manufacturers and suppliers are located. As a result, the COVID-19 pandemic may result in further supply shortages of products for us or our TV brand partners, delays in shipping and transportation services that negatively impact our ability or our TV brand partners’ ability to import, export, ship, or sell products to customers in U.S. and international markets, and our ability to market and sell our streaming services internationally. Any limitations or delays on our or our TV brand partners’ ability to produce, import, export, ship, or sell our products would harm our business, and could negatively impact our international sales.
In addition, the effects of the United Kingdom’s departure from the EU have been and are expected to continue to be far-reaching. Brexit and the perceptions as to its impact may adversely affect business activity and economic conditions. Brexit could also have the effect of disrupting the free movement of goods, services, and people between the United Kingdom and the EU, and some disruptions have already occurred. Brexit could also lead to legal uncertainty and potentially divergent national laws and regulations applyas the United Kingdom determines which EU laws to replace or replicate. Although the collection,EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement on the EU-UK post-Brexit economic relationship took effect on January 1, 2021, it is incomplete, and the full effects of Brexit are uncertain. Given these possibilities and others we may not anticipate, as well as the lack of comparable precedent, the full extent to which our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be adversely affected by Brexit is uncertain.
40


U.S. or international rules (or the absence of rules) that permit internet access network operators to degrade users’ internet speeds or limit internet data consumption by users, including unreasonable discrimination in the provision of broadband internet access services, could harm our business.
Our products and services depend on the ability of our users to access the internet. Laws, regulations, or court rulings that adversely affect the popularity or growth in use retention, protection, disclosure, security, transferof the internet, including decisions that undermine open and other processingneutrally administered internet access, or that disincentivize internet access network operators’ willingness to invest in upgrades and maintenance of personal data. These privacytheir equipment, could decrease customer demand for our service offerings, may impose additional burdens on us, or could cause us to incur additional expenses or alter our business model. Some jurisdictions have adopted regulations governing the provision of internet access service. Substantial uncertainty exists in the United States and elsewhere regarding such provisions. For example, in 2015, the FCC adopted open internet rules to prevent internet access network operators from unreasonably restricting, blocking, degrading, or charging for access to certain products and services offered by us and our content partners. In 2018, the FCC repealed most of those rules. More recently, the Biden Administration signed an executive order encouraging the FCC to readopt comprehensive open internet rules. The FCC therefore could consider adopting additional or modified rules to prevent internet access network operators from unreasonably restricting, blocking, degrading, or charging for data protection-relatedand services. If network operators were to engage in restricting, blocking, degrading, or charging for access, it could impede our growth, result in a decline in our quality of service, cause us to incur additional expense, or otherwise impair our ability to attract and retain users, any of which could harm our business. Several states and foreign countries in which we operate also have adopted or are considering rules governing the provision of internet access.
As we expand internationally, government regulation protecting the non-discriminatory provision of internet access may be nascent or non-existent. In those markets where regulatory safeguards against unreasonable discrimination are nascent or non-existent and where local network operators possess substantial market power, we could experience anti-competitive practices that could impede our growth, cause us to incur additional expenses, or otherwise harm our business. Future regulations or changes in laws and regulations are evolving, with new(or their existing interpretations or modified lawsapplications) could also hinder our operational flexibility, raise compliance costs, and regulations proposed and implemented frequently and existing laws and regulations subject to new or different interpretations. In addition, some state and national governments have passed laws requiring notification of users when there has been a security breach involving personal data. Compliance with these laws and regulations can be costly and could delay or impede the development of new products.

We historically have relied upon adherence to the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Safe Harbor Privacy Principles and compliance with the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Framework under Directive 95/46/EC, commonly referred to as the Data Protection Directive, agreed to by the U.S. Department of Commerce and the EU. The U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Framework,result in additional liabilities for us, which established means for legitimizing the transfer of personal data by U.S. companies from the European Economic Area, or EEA, to the United States, recently was invalidated by a decision of the European Court of Justice, or the ECJ.

On July 12, 2016, the European Commission adopted the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield, which provides a framework for the transfer of personal data of EU data subjects, and on May 4, 2016, the EU General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, which will replace Directive 95/46/EC, was formally published. The GDPR will go into effect on May 25, 2018 and as a regulation as opposed to a directive will be directly applicable in EU member states. Among other things, the GDPR applies to data controllers and processors outside of the EU whose processing activities relate to the offering of goods or services to, or monitoring the behavior within the EU of, EU data subjects.


In light of these developments, we are reviewing our business practices and may find it necessary or desirable to make changes to our personal data handling to cause our transfer and receipt of EEA residents’ personal data to be legitimized under applicable European law. The regulation of data privacy in the EU continues to evolve, and it is not possible to predict the ultimate effect of evolving data protection regulation and implementation over time.

While we have implemented administrative, physical and electronic security measures to protect against reasonably foreseeable loss, misuse and alteration of personal data and confidential information (e.g., protected content or intellectual property), cyberattacks on companies have increased in frequency and potential impact in recent years and, if successful against us, may harm our reputation and business and subject us to potential liability despite reasonable precautions.

Our actual or alleged failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations or to protect personal data could result in enforcement actions and significant penalties against us, which could result in negative publicity, increase our operating costs, subject us to claims or other remedies and may harm our business.

If we are found liable for content that we distributeis distributed through or advertising that is served through our players,platform, our business could be harmed.

As a distributor of content, we face potential liability for negligence, copyright, patent, or trademark infringement, public performance royalties or other claims based on the nature and content of materials that we distribute. TheWe rely on the statutory safe harbors, as set forth in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act or(the “DMCA”) and Section 230 of the DMCA, is intended,Communications Decency Act in part, to limit the United States, and the E-Commerce Directive in Europe, for protection against liability of eligible service providers for various caching, hosting, orand linking to, user content that includes materials that infringe copyrights or other rights. We rely on the protections provided by theactivities. The DMCA, in conducting our business. However, the DMCASection 230, and similar statutes and doctrines thaton which we rely or may rely on in the future isare subject to uncertain judicial interpretation and regulatory and legislative amendments. Any legislation or court rulings that limit the applicability of these safe harbors could require us to take a different approach toward content moderation on our platform, which could diminish the depth, breadth, and variety of content that we offer, inhibit our ability to generate advertising, or otherwise adversely affect our business.
Moreover, the DMCA only provides protection primarily in the United States. Ifif the rules around these statutes and doctrines change, if international jurisdictions refuse to apply similar protections, or if a court were to disagree with our application of those rules to our business, we could incur liabilityliabilities and our business could be harmed. If we become liable for these types of claims as a result of the content that is streamed over or the advertisements that are served through our platform, then our business may suffer. Litigation to defend these claims could be costly and the expenses and damages arising from any liability could harm our business. Our insurance may not be adequate to cover these types of claims or any liability that may be imposed on us.

In addition, regardless of any legal protections that may limit our liability for the actions of third parties, we may be adversely impacted if copyright holders assert claims, or commence litigation, alleging copyright infringement against the developers of channels that are distributed on our platform. While our platform policies prohibit streaming content on our platform without distribution rights from the copyright holder, and we maintain processes and systems for the reporting and removal of infringing content, in certain instances our platform has been misused by unaffiliated third parties to unlawfully distribute copyrighted content. For example, weIf content owners or distributors are involved in litigation in Mexico that was commenced by a large Mexican pay TV and Internet access provider. The Company was not nameddeterred from working with us as a defendant in this case, and the case principally targeted entities that are alleged to sell unlicensed content to consumers using our platform, among other means.  Involvement in these legal proceedings has been complicated and has drawn management time and company resources.  

Our involvement in any such legal matters now or in the future,consequence, it could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and other costs, and be disruptive to our business.

Our devices are highly technical and may contain undetected hardware errors or software bugs, which could manifest themselves in ways that could harm our reputation and our business.

Our devices and those of our licensees are highly technical and have contained and may in the future contain undetected software bugs or hardware errors. These bugs and errors can manifest themselves in any number of ways in our devices or our platform, including through diminished performance, security vulnerabilities, data quality in logs or interpretation of data, malfunctions or even permanently disabled devices. Some errors in our devices may only be discovered after a device has been shipped and used by users, and may in some cases only be detected under certain circumstances or after extended use. We update our software on a regular basis and, despite our quality assurance processes, we could introduce bugs in the process of updating our software. The introduction of a serious software bug, could result in devices becoming permanently disabled. We offer a limited one year warranty in the United States and any such defects discovered in our players after commercial release could result in loss of revenue or delay in revenue recognition, loss of customer goodwill and users and increased service costs, any of which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. We could also face claims for product or information


liability, tort or breach of warranty. In addition, our player contracts with users contain provisions relating to warranty disclaimers and liability limitations, which may not be upheld. Defending a lawsuit, regardless of its merit, is costly and may divert management’s attention and adversely affect the market’s perception of Roku and our devices. In addition, if our business liability insurance coverage proves inadequate or future coverage is unavailable on acceptable terms or at all, our business could be harmed.

Components used in our devices may fail as a result of manufacturing, design or other defects over which we have no control and render our devices permanently inoperable.

We rely on third-party component suppliers to provide certain functionalities needed for the operation and use of our devices. Any errors or defects in such third-party technology could result in errors in our devices that could harm our business. If these components have a manufacturing, design or other defect, they can cause our devices to fail and render them permanently inoperable. For example, the typical means by which our users connect their home networks to our devices is by way of a Wi-Fi access point in the home network router. If the Wi-Fi receiver in our device fails, then our device cannot detect a home network’s Wi-Fi access point, and our device will not be able to display or deliver any content to the TV screen. As a result, we may have to replace these devices at our sole cost and expense. Should we have a widespread problem of this kind, our reputation in the market could be adversely affected and our replacement of these devices would harm our business.

If we are unable to obtain necessary or desirable third-party technology licenses,impair our ability to develop new devicesmaintain or platform enhancements may be impaired.

We utilize commercially available off-the-shelf technology in the development ofexpand our devices and platform. As we continue to introduce new features or improvements to our devices and the Roku platform, we may be required to license additional technologies from third parties. These third-party licenses may be unavailable to us on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. If we are unable to obtain necessary third-party licenses, we may be required to obtain substitute technologies with lower quality or performance standards, or at a greater cost, any of which could harm the competitiveness of our devices, platform and our business.

Our use of open source software could impose limitations on our ability to commercialize our devices and our TV streaming platform.

We incorporate open source software in our TV streaming platform. From time to time, companies that incorporate open source software into their products have faced claims challenging the ownership of open source software and/or compliance with open source license terms. Therefore, we could be subject to suits by parties claiming ownership of what we believe to be open source software or noncompliance with open source licensing terms. Although we monitor our use of open source software, the terms of many open source software licenses have not been interpreted by U.S. courts, and there is a risk that such licenses could be construed in a manner that could impose unanticipated conditions or restrictions on the sale of our devices. In such event, we could be required to make our proprietary software generally available to third parties,business, including competitors, at no cost, to seek licenses from third parties in order to continue offering our devices, to re-engineer our devices or to discontinue the sale of our devices in the event re-engineering cannot be accomplished on a timely basis or at all, any of which could harm our business.

The quality of our customer support is important to our users and licensees, and ifthrough international expansion plans.

If we fail to provide adequate levels of customer support we could lose users and licensees, which would harm our business.

Our users and licensees depend on our customer support organization to resolve any issues relating to devices. A high level of support is critical for the successful marketing and sale of devices. We currently outsource our customer support operation to a third-party customer support organization. If we do not effectively train, update and manage our third-party customer support organization to assist our users, and if that support organization does not succeed in helping them quickly resolve issues or provide effective ongoing support, it could adversely affect our ability to sell our devices to users and harm our reputation with potential new users and our licensees.


We will need to improve our operational and financial systems to support our expected growth, increasingly complex business arrangements, and rules governing revenue and expense recognition and any inability to do so could adversely affect our billing services and financial reporting.

We have increasingly complex business arrangements with our content publishers and licensees, and the rules that govern revenue and expense recognition in our business are increasingly complex. To manage the expected growth of our operations and increasing complexity, we will need to improve our operational and financial systems, procedures and controls and continue to increase systems automation to reduce reliance on manual operations. Any inability to do so will negatively affect our billing services and financial reporting. Our current and planned systems, procedures and controls may not be adequate to support our complex arrangements and the rules governing revenue and expense recognition for our future operations and expected growth. Delays or problems associated with any improvement or expansion of our operational and financial systems and controls could adversely affect our relationships with our users, content publishers or licensees; cause harm to our reputation and brand; and could also result in errors in our financial and other reporting.

If we are unable to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports and the market price of our Class A common stock may be adversely affected.

We are required to maintain internal control over financial reporting and to report any material weaknesses in such internal control. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 404”) requires that we furnish a report by
41


management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting beginning with the year ending December 31, 2018.reporting. This assessment will need tomust include disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in our internal control over financial reporting. Our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to attestalso attests to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting until our first annual report required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, following the later of the date we are deemed to be an “accelerated filer” or a “large accelerated filer,” each as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the date we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act.reporting. If we have a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting in the future, we may not detect errors on a timely basis, and our financial statements may be materially misstated. We are in the process of designing and implementing the internal control over financial reporting required to comply with this obligation, which process will be time-consuming, costly and complicated. If we identify material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, are unable to continue to comply with the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner, are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, and the market price of our Class A common stock could be adversely affected. In addition, we could become subject to investigations by the stock exchange on which our Class A common stock is listed, the SEC, The Nasdaq Global Select Market, or other regulatory authorities, which could require additional financial and management resources.

We

Our financial results may pursue acquisitions,be adversely affected by changes in accounting principles applicable to us.
U.S. GAAP are subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the SEC, and other bodies formed to promulgate and interpret appropriate accounting principles. A change in these principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on our reported results of operations and may even affect the reporting of transactions completed before the announcement or effectiveness of a change. It is difficult to predict the impact of future changes to accounting principles or our accounting policies, any of which involve a number of risks, and if we are unable to address and resolve these risks successfully, such acquisitions could harm our business.

We may in the future acquire businesses, products or technologies to expand our offerings and capabilities, user base and business. We have evaluated, and expect to continue to evaluate, a wide array of potential strategic transactions; however, we have limited experience completing or integrating acquisitions. Any acquisition could be material to our financial condition and results of operations and any anticipated benefits from an acquisition may never materialize. In addition, the process of integrating acquired businesses, products or technologies may create unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures. Acquisitions in international markets would involve additional risks, including those related to integration of operations across different cultures and languages, currency risks and the particular economic, political and regulatory risks associated with specific countries. We may not be able to address these risks successfully, or at all, without incurring significant costs, delays or other operational problems and if we were unable to address such risks successfully our business could be harmed.


We have a credit facility that provides our lender with a first-priority lien against substantially all of our assets and contains financial covenants and other restrictions on our actions that may limit our operational flexibility or otherwise adversely affect our financial condition.

We entered into an amended and restated loan and security agreement with Silicon Valley Bank in November 2014, which was amended in May 2015 and June 2017, providing for a $30.0 million revolving line of credit. Our loan agreement with Silicon Valley Bank contains a number of restrictive covenants, and the terms may restrict our current and future operations, particularly our ability to respond to certain changes in our business or industry, or take future actions. Pursuant to this agreement, we granted Silicon Valley Bank a security interest in substantially all of our assets. See the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Silicon Valley Bank Loan and Security Agreement.”

If we fail to comply with the covenants or payments specified in our credit facility, Silicon Valley Bank could declare an event of default, which would give it the right to terminate its commitment to provide additional loans and declare all borrowings outstanding, together with accrued and unpaid interest and fees, to be immediately due and payable. In addition, Silicon Valley Bank would have the right to proceed against the assets we provided as collateral pursuant to the credit facility. If the debt under this credit facility was accelerated, we may not have sufficient cash or be able to sell sufficient assets to repay this debt, which would harm our business and financial condition.

If we fail to comply with the laws and regulations relating to the collection of sales tax and payment of income taxes inand the various states in which we do business,collection of indirect taxes, we could be exposed to unexpected costs, expenses, penalties, and fees as a result of our noncompliance, which could harm our business.

By engaging in business activities in the United States, we become

We are subject to various state laws and regulations, including requirements to collect sales tax from our sales within those states, and the payment ofdeduct or withhold income taxes on revenue generatedsourced in various jurisdictions, pay income taxes on profits earned by any permanent establishment (or similar enterprise) of ours that carries on business in various jurisdictions, and collect indirect taxes from activitiesour sales in those states.various jurisdictions. The laws and regulations governing the collection of sales tax for sales on our websitewithholding and payment of income taxes and the collection of indirect taxes are numerous, complex, and vary from state to state.by jurisdiction. A successful assertion by one or more statesjurisdictions that we were required to collect saleswithhold or otherpay income taxes or to pay incomecollect indirect taxes where we did not could result in substantial tax liabilities, fees, and expenses, including substantial interest and penalty charges, which could harm our business.

New legislation that would change U.S. or foreign taxation of international business activities or other tax-reform policies could harm our business.
We earn a portion of our income in foreign countries and, as such, we are subject to tax laws in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Current economic and political conditions make tax laws and regulations, or their interpretation and application, in any jurisdiction subject to significant change.
Proposals to reform U.S. and foreign tax laws could significantly impact how U.S. multinational corporations are taxed on foreign earnings and could increase the U.S. corporate tax rate. Although we cannot predict whether or in what form these proposals will pass, several of the proposals under consideration, if enacted into law, could have an adverse impact on our effective tax rate, income tax expense, and cash flows.
In addition, both tax policy and tax administration are becoming multilateral. This multilateralism and collaboration among taxing authorities (including the U.S. and many foreign jurisdictions in which we operate) has resulted in proposed new tax measures specifically targeting online commerce, digital services, streaming services, and the remote sale of goods and services. Some of these measures (such as a global corporate minimum tax) require adoption of local legislation consistent with the agreed to multilateral framework. Other measures (such as digital services taxes) have already been implemented but may terminate upon the adoption of multilateral tax rules.
The rapid growth of multilateralism in tax administration means greater sharing of tax information among taxing authorities as well as the likelihood of joint and simultaneous tax audits of companies such as ours who have cross-border business activities in which the tax administrations may have a common or complementary interest. The results of any such audits or related disputes could have an adverse effect on our financial results for the period or periods for which the applicable final determinations are made. For example, we and our subsidiaries are engaged in intercompany transactions across multiple tax jurisdictions. Although we believe we have clearly reflected the economics of these transactions and that the proper local transfer pricing is in place, tax authorities may propose and sustain adjustments that could result in changes that may impact our mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates.
42


We have been, are currently, and may in the future be subject to regulatory inquiries, investigations, and proceedings, which could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices in a way that could seriously harm our business.

Reforming the taxation of international businesses has

We have been, a priority for U.S. politicians,are currently, and key members of the legislative and executive branches have proposed a wide variety of potential changes. Certain changes to U.S. tax laws, including limitations on the ability to defer U.S. taxation on earnings outside of the United States until those earnings are repatriated to the United States, could affect the tax treatment of our foreign earnings, as well as cash and cash equivalent balances we maintain outside the United States. Additionally, any changesmay in the U.S.future be subject to investigations and inquiries from government entities. These investigations and inquiries, and our compliance with any associated regulatory orders or foreign taxationconsent decrees, may require us to change our policies or practices, subject us to substantial monetary fines or other penalties or sanctions, result in increased operating costs, divert management’s attention, harm our reputation, and require us to incur significant legal and other expenses, any of such activities may increase our worldwide effective tax rate and the amount of taxes we pay andwhich could seriously harm our business.

For example, the Tax Cut and Jobs Act (“TCJA”) was enacted on December 22, 2017 and significantly reforms the Code. The TCJA, among other things, includes changes to U.S. federal tax rates, imposes additional limitations on the deductibility of interest, has both positive and negative changes to the utilization of future net operating loss carryforwards, allows for the expensing of certain capital expenditures, and puts into effect the migration from a “worldwide” system of taxation to a territorial system. Our net deferred tax assets and liabilities and valuation allowance will be revalued at the newly enacted U.S. corporate rate. We continue to examine the impact this tax reform legislation may have on our business. The impact of this tax reform on us and on holders of our common stock is uncertain and could be adverse and our business could be seriously harmed.


We may require additional capital to meet our financial obligations and support planned business growth, and this capital might not be available on acceptable terms or at all.

We intend to continue to make significant investments to support planned business growth and may require additional funds to respond to business challenges, including the need to develop new devices and enhance the Roku platform, maintain adequate levels of inventory to support our retail partners’ demand requirements, improve our operating infrastructure or acquire complementary businesses, personnel and technologies. Accordingly, we may need to engage in equity or debt financings to secure additional funds. If we raise additional funds through future issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, our then existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges superior to those of holders of our Class A common stock. Any debt financing we secure could involve restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities, including potential acquisitions. If we were to violate the restrictive covenants, we could incur penalties, increased expenses and an acceleration of the payment terms of our outstanding debt, which could in turn harm our business.

We may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us, if at all. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us when we require it, our ability to continue to support our business growth and to respond to business challenges could be significantly impaired, and our business may be harmed.

Our facilities are located near known earthquake fault zones, and the occurrence of an earthquake or other natural disaster could cause damage to our facilities and computer systems, which could require us to curtail or cease operations.

Our principal offices and a network operations center are located in the San Francisco Bay Area, an area known for earthquakes, and are thus vulnerable to damage. We are also vulnerable to damage from other types of disasters, including power loss, fire, floods, communications failures and similar events. If any disaster were to occur, our ability to operate our business at our facilities could be impaired.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Class A Common Stock

The dual class structure of our common stock as contained in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation has the effect of concentratingconcentrates voting control with those stockholders who held our stock prior to our IPO,initial public offering, including our executive officers, employees, and directors and their affiliates, and limiting yourlimits the ability of holders of our Class A common stock to influence corporate matters.

Our Class B common stock has 10 votes per share, and our Class A common stock has one vote per share. Our President and Chief Executive Officer, Anthony Wood, holds and controls the vote of a significant number of shares of our outstanding common stock, and therefore Mr. Wood will have significant influence over our management and affairs and over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including election of directors and significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale of Roku or our assets, for the foreseeable future. If Mr. Wood’s employment with us is terminated, he will continue to have the same influence over matters requiring stockholder approval.

In addition, the holders of Class B common stock collectively will continue to be able to control all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval even if their stock holdings represent less than 50%a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Because of the 10-to-1 voting ratio between our Class B and Class A common stock, the holders of our Class B common stock collectively will continue to control a majority of the combined voting power of our common stock even when the shares of Class B common stock represent as little as 10% of the combined voting power of all outstanding shares of our Class A and Class B common stock. This concentrated control will limit yourthe ability of holders of our Class A common stock to influence corporate matters for the foreseeable future, and, as a result, the market price of our Class A common stock could be adversely affected.

Future transfers by holders of Class B common stock will generally result in those shares converting to Class A common stock, which will have the effect, over time, of increasing the relative voting power of those holders of Class B common stock who retain their shares in the long term. If, for example,As a result of such transfers, as of December 31, 2021, Mr. Wood retainscontrols a significant portion of his holdings of Class B common stock for an extended period of time, he could, in the future, control a


majority of the combined voting power of our Class A and Class B common stock even though he only owns 12.0% of the outstanding Class A and Class B common stock. As a board member, Mr. Wood owes a fiduciary duty to our stockholders and must act in good faith in a manner he reasonably believes to be in the best interests of our stockholders. As a stockholder, even a controlling stockholder, Mr. Wood is entitled to vote his shares in his own interests, which may not always be in the interests of our stockholders generally.

Our This concentrated control could delay, defer, or prevent a change of control, merger, consolidation, or sale of all or substantially all of our assets that our other stockholders support, or conversely this concentrated control could result in the consummation of such a transaction that our other stockholders do not support. This concentrated control could also discourage a potential investor from acquiring our Class A common stock, which has limited voting power relative to the Class B common stock and might harm the trading price of our Class A common stock.

We have not elected to take advantage of the “controlled company” exemption to the corporate governance rules for companies listed on The Nasdaq Global Select Market.
The trading price of our Class A common stock has been, and may continue to be, volatile, and the value of our Class A common stock may decline.

The market price of our Class A common stock couldhas been and may continue to be subject to wide fluctuations in response to numerous factors, many risk factors listed in this section, and othersof which are beyond our control, including:

actual or anticipated fluctuations in our financial condition and operating results;

changes in projected operational and financial results;

our loss by us of key content publishers;

changes in laws or regulations applicable to our devices or platform;

the commencement or conclusion of legal proceedings that involve us;

actual or anticipated changes in our growth rate relative to our competitors;

announcements of new products or services by us or our competitors;

announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, or joint ventures or ventures;

capital-raising activities or commitments;

43


additions or departures of key personnel;

issuance of new or updated research or reports by securities analysts;

the use by investors or analysts of third-party data regarding our business that may not reflect our financial performance;

fluctuations in the valuation of companies perceived by investors to be comparable to us;

sales of our Class A common stock, including short selling of our Class A common stock;

share price and volume fluctuations attributable to inconsistent trading volume levels of our shares;

the expiration of contractual lock-up agreements; and

general economic and market conditions.

conditions; and
other events or factors, including those resulting from civil unrest, war, foreign invasions, terrorism, or public health crises, or responses to such events.

Furthermore, the stock markets frequently experience extreme price and volume fluctuations that affect the market prices of equity securities of many companies. These fluctuations often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations, as well as general economic, political, and market conditions such as recessions, elections, interest rate changes, or international currency fluctuations, may negatively impact the market price of our Class A common stock. As a result of such fluctuations, you may not realize any return on your investment in us and may lose some or all of your investment. In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been subject to securities class action litigation or derivative litigation. We may be the targetFor example, a stockholder has filed a derivative lawsuit, purportedly on our behalf, against certain members of this typeour Board of litigationDirectors and management in the future. SecuritiesDelaware Court of Chancery. Such litigation against us could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention from other business concerns, which could harm our business.

concerns.

Future sales and issuances of our capital stock or rights to purchase capital stock could result in additional dilution of the percentage ownership of our stockholders and could cause our stock price to decline.

We may issue additional securities in the future and from time to time. Future sales and issuances of our capital stock or rights to purchase our capital stock could result in substantial dilution to our existing stockholders. We may sell or issue Class A common stock, convertible securities, and other equity securities in one or more transactions at prices and in a manner as we may determine from time to time. If we sell any such securities in subsequent transactions, investors may be materially diluted. New investors in such subsequent transactions could gain rights, preferences, and privileges senior to those of holders of our Class A common stock.


Future sales of shares by existing stockholders could cause our stock price to decline.

If our existing stockholders sell, or indicate an intention to sell, substantial amounts of our Class A common stock in the public market, the trading price of our Class A common stock could decline. All of our outstanding Class A shares are eligible for sale in the public market, other than shares and stock options exercisable held by directors, executive officers and other affiliates that are subject to volume limitations under Rule 144 of the Securities Act. In addition, we have reserved shares for future issuance under our equity incentive plan. Our directors, employees, and certain contingent workers are subject to our quarterly trading window, which generally opens at the start of the second full trading day after the public dissemination of our annual or quarterly financial results and closes (i) with respect to the first, second, and third quarter of each year, at the end of the fifteenth day of the last month of the such quarter and (ii) with respect to the fourth quarter of each year, at the end of the trading day on the Wednesday before Thanksgiving. These directors, employees, and contingent workers may also sell shares during a closed window period pursuant to trading plans that comply with the requirements of Rule 10b5-1(c)(1) under the Exchange Act. When these shares are issued and subsequently sold, it is dilutive to existing stockholders and the trading price of our Class A common stock could decline.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish unfavorable research about our business or if they downgrade our stock, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

A limited number of equity research analysts provide research coverage of our Class A common stock, and we cannot assure you that such equity research analysts will adequately provide research coverage of our Class A common stock. A lack of adequate research coverage may adversely affect the liquidity and market price of our Class A common stock. ToIf securities or industry analysts cover our company and one or more of these analysts downgrades our stock or issues other unfavorable commentary or research, the extent we obtain equity research analyst coverage, we will not have any control of the analysts or the content and opinions included in their reports. The price of our Class A common stock could decline if one or more equity research analysts downgrade our stock or issue other unfavorable commentary or research.decline. If one or more equity research analysts cease coverage of our company, or fail to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.

44


We incur costs and demands upon management as a result of complying with the laws and regulations affecting public companies in the United States, which may harm our business.

As a public company listed in the United States, we incur significant additional legal, accounting, and other expenses. In addition, changing laws, regulations, and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including regulations implemented by the SEC and The NASDAQNasdaq Global Select Market regulations, may increase legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time consuming. These laws, regulations, and standards are subject to varying interpretations and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. We intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations, and standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. If, notwithstanding our efforts, we fail to comply with new laws, regulations, and standards, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us, and our business may be harmed.

Failure to comply with these rules might also make it more difficult for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance, and we might be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. The impact of these events could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our Board of Directors, on committees of our Board of Directors, or as members of senior management.

We are an “emerging growth company,” and we intend to comply only with reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies. As a result, our Class A common stock could be less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act and, for as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we may choose to take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies but not to emerging growth companies, including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of the closing of the IPO, (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of over $1.07 billion or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the prior June 30th, and (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period. We cannot predict if investors will find our Class A common stock less attractive if we choose to rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our Class A common stock less attractive as a result of any choices to reduce future disclosure, there may be a less active trading market for our Class A common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.


We do not intend to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our Class A or Class B common stock and do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We anticipate that we will retain all of our future earnings to grow our business and for general corporate purposes. Moreover, our outstanding loan and security agreements containCredit Agreement contains prohibitions on the payment of cash dividends on our capital stock. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors. Accordingly, investors must rely on sales of their Class A common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any future gains on their investments.

Provisions inof our corporate charter documents and under Delaware law may prevent or frustrate attempts by our stockholders to change our management or hinder efforts to acquire a controlling interest in us, and the market price of our Class A common stock may be lower as a result.

There are provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws that may make it difficult for a third-partythird party to acquire, or attempt to acquire, control of Roku, even if a change in control was considered favorable by our stockholders.

Our charter documents also contain other provisions that could have an anti-takeover effect, such as:

establishing a classified Board of Directors so that not all members of our Board of Directors are elected at one time;

permitting the Board of Directors to establish the number of directors and fill any vacancies and newly created directorships;

providing that directors may only be removed for cause;

prohibiting cumulative voting for directors;

requiring super-majority voting to amend some provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws;

authorizing the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock that our Board of Directors could use to implement a stockholder rights plan;

eliminating the ability of stockholders to call special meetings of stockholders;

prohibiting stockholder action by written consent, which requires all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our stockholders; and

reflecting our two classes of common stock as described above.

reflecting our two classes of common stock as described above.

Moreover, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prohibitprohibits a person who owns 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock from merging or combining with us for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person acquired in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock, unless the merger or combination is approved in a prescribed manner. Any provision in our certificate of incorporation or our bylaws or Delaware law that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our Class A common stock and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our Class A common stock.

45


Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provideprovides that the Delaware Court of Chancery ofand the State of Delaware and theU.S. federal district courts of the United States of America will be the exclusive forums for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or employees.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the Delaware Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the exclusive forum for the following types of actions or proceedings under Delaware statutory or common law:
any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf;
any action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty;
any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, or our bylaws; or and
any action asserting a


claim against us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine. Our amended

This provision would not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. Furthermore, Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and restatedstate courts over all Securities Act actions. Accordingly, both state and federal courts have jurisdiction to entertain such claims.
To prevent having to litigate claims in multiple jurisdictions and the threat of inconsistent or contrary rulings by different courts, among other considerations, our certificate of incorporation further provides that the U.S. federal district courts of the United States of America will be the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. These
While the Delaware courts have determined that such choice of forum provisions are facially valid, a stockholder may nevertheless seek to bring a claim in a venue other than those designated in the exclusive forum provisions. In such instance, we would expect to vigorously assert the validity and enforceability of the exclusive forum provisions of our certificate of incorporation. This may require significant additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions and there can be no assurance that the provisions will be enforced by a court in those other jurisdictions.
These exclusive forum provisions may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for certain disputes with us or our directors, officers, or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers, and other employees. In December 2017, a plaintiff filed a complaint in the Court of Chancery in Delaware seeking a declaration that these choice of forum provisions are invalid and unenforceable. If a court were to find either choice ofexclusive forum provision contained in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur further significant additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, all of which could harm our business.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None

None.

Item 2. Properties

Our corporate headquarters are currently located in Los Gatos,San Jose, California where we lease approximately 156,000 square feet of commercial space under a lease that expires in 2020.September 2030. We use this space for sales, research and development, and administrative purposes. We also hold a lease for approximately 78,000 square feet of commercial office space in Saratoga, California through 2020. We have sublet a portion of this space and we are working to sublet the remainder prior to lease expiration. In addition, we maintain offices in Austin, Texas; Cambridge,lease various office and shared work spaces throughout the United Kingdom; Santa Monica, California; Chicago, Illinois; Shanghai, China; Tilst, DenmarkStates and New York, New York.

internationally. We believe that our facilities are suitable to meet our current needs. We intend to expand our existing facilities or add new facilities as we add employees and enter new geographic markets, and we believe that suitable additional or alternative space will be available as needed to accommodate any such growth. However, we expect to incur additional expenses in connection with such new or expanded facilities.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Information with respect to this item may be found in Note 812 to the Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None


None.

46


PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

Our Class A common stock began trading publiclyis listed on The NASDAQNasdaq Global Select Market under the ticker symbol “ROKU” on September 28, 2017. Prior to that time, there was no public market for our Class A common stock. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sale prices of our Class A common stock as reported on The NASDAQ Global Select Market since our IPO.

Year Ended December 31, 2017

 

High

 

 

Low

 

Third Quarter (from September 29, 2017)

 

$

29.80

 

 

$

15.75

 

Fourth Quarter

 

 

58.80

 

 

 

18.35

 

On February 14, 2018, the last reported sales price of our Class A common stock on The NASDAQ Global Select Market was $44.85 per share.“ROKU.” Our Class B common stock is not listed or traded on any exchange.

Holders of Record

As of February 14, 2018,January 31, 2022, there were 461 stockholders of record of our Class A common stock. This figure does not include a substantially greater number ofThere were significantly more beneficial holdersowners of our Class A common stock whose shares are held of record by banks, brokers and other financial institutions.stock. As of February 14, 2018,January 31, 2022, there were approximately 22516 stockholders of record of our Class B common stock.

Dividend Policy

We have never declared or paid any dividends on our Class A or Class B common stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings for use in our business and therefore we do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

The terms of our Credit Agreement also restrict our ability to pay dividends, and we may also enter into credit agreements or other borrowing arrangements in the future that will restrict our ability to declare or pay cash dividends on our capital stock.

Sale of Unregistered Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a)

Unregistered SaleNone.

Purchases of Equity Securities

The following sets forth information regarding all unregistered securities sold from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (share and per share amounts give effect to a 1-for-6 reverse stock split of our common stock and preferred stock effected on September 15, 2017):

1.

Prior to filing our registration statement on Form S-8 in September 2017, we granted stock options to purchase an aggregate of 3,219,857 shares of Class B common stock at an exercise prices of $8.82 per share to a total of 209 employees, consultants and directors under our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2008 Plan”);

2.

Prior to filing our registration statement on Form S-8 in September 2017, we issued and sold an aggregate of 267,813 shares of Class B common stock upon the exercise of options under our 2008 Plan at exercise prices ranging from $0.16 to $6.12, per share, for an aggregate exercise price of $868,055;

3.

In July 2017, we issued 357,283 shares of our Class B common stock upon the automatic net exercise of a warrant to purchase 375,000 shares of our Class B common stock; and

4.

In September 2017, we issued 108,332 shares of Class B common stock in connection with an acquisition;

The offers, sales and issuances of the securities described in paragraphs (1) through (4) above were deemed to be exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act or Regulation D promulgated thereunder or Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act as transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering or under benefit plans and contracts relating to compensation as provided under Rule


701. The recipients of securities in each of these transactions acquired the securities for investment only and not with a view to or for sale in connection with any distribution thereof and appropriate legends were affixed to the securities issued in these transactions. Each of the recipients of securities in these transactions was an accredited or sophisticated person and had adequate access, through employment, business or other relationships, to information about us.

(b)

Use of Proceeds

On September 27, 2017, our registration statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-220318) was declared effective by the SEC for our IPO of Class A common stock, pursuant to which, we issuedIssuer and sold 9.0 million shares of our Class A common stock on October 2, 2017, and on the same day we issued and sold an aggregate of 1.4 million shares of our Class A common stock pursuant to the underwriters’ exercise of their option to purchase additional shares, in each case at a public offering price of $14.00 per share. Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. acted as joint book-running managers for the offering and Allen & Company LLC, RBC Capital Markets, Needham & Company, Oppenheimer & Co. and William Blair acted as co-managers for the offering. Following the sale of the shares in connection with the closing of the IPO, the offering terminated. As a result of the offering, we received total net proceeds of approximately $131.6 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of $10.1 million and offering-related expenses of approximately $3.1 million. No payments for such expenses were made directly or indirectly to (i) any of our officers or directors or their associates, (ii) any persons owning 10% or more of any class of our equity securities, or (iii) any of our affiliates.

There has been no material change in the planned use of proceeds from our IPO from that described in the final prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with the SEC on September 28, 2017.

Affiliated Purchasers

None.
Stock Performance Graphs and Cumulative Total Return

This performance graph shall not be deemed “filed” with the SEC for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, or incorporated by reference into any filing of Roku, Inc., under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.

The following graph shows the cumulative total stockholder return of an investment of $100 in cash from September 29, 2017 (the date our Class A common stock commenced trading on the NASDAQ)The Nasdaq Global Select Market) through December 31, 2017,2021, for (i) our Class A common stock, (ii) the NASDAQNasdaq Composite Index, and (iii) the Peer Group of companies. Because no published index of comparable player and platform companies is currently available, we have used the Peer Group of companies for the purposes of this graph in accordance with the requirements of the SEC. The Peer Group is made up of Facebook, Inc., Alphabet, Inc., Logitech International S.A., Meta Platforms, Inc., Netflix, Inc., Snap, Inc., Twitter, Inc., Yelp, Inc., and Zillow Group, Inc. Not all of the companies included in the Peer Group participate in all the lines of business in which we are engaged, and some of the companies are engaged in lines of business in which we do not participate. Additionally, the market capitalization of some of the companies included in the Peer Group are different from ours.


Pursuant to applicable SEC rules, all values assume reinvestment of the full amount of all dividends, however no dividends have been declared on our Class A common stock or Class B common stock to date. The stockholder return shown on the graph below is not necessarily indicative of future performance, and we do not make or endorse any predictions as to future stockholder returns.

Company name / Index

9/28/2017

9/30/2017

10/31/2017

11/30/2017

12/31/2017

Roku, Inc.

$100.00

$189.57

$145.57

$313.57

$369.86

NASDAQ Composite Index

$100.00

$100.66

$104.30

$106.74

$107.25

Peer Group

$100.00

$101.01

$107.16

$106.21

$107.39

47



roku-20211231_g1.jpg
Company / IndexDec-17Dec-18Dec-19Dec-20Dec-21
Roku, Inc.$370$219$956$2,371$1,630
Nasdaq Composite Index$107$104$142$206$252
Peer Group$107$98$134$193$270
Source: Prepared by Zacks Investment Research, Inc. Used with permission. All rights reserved. Copyright 1980-2021.
Index Data: Copyright NASDAQ OMX, Inc. Used with permission. All rights reserved.
The information under “Stock Performance Graphs and Cumulative Total Return” is not deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date of this Annual Report and irrespective of any general incorporation language in those filings.
Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table summarizes information about our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2017. All outstanding awards relate to our2021.
Plan CategoryNumber of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options and awards
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options (1)
Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuances
under equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
in column (a))
(a)(b)(c)
(in thousands, except per share amount)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (2)9,460$51.87 32,100
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
Total9,460$51.87 32,100
(1)Restricted stock units have been excluded for purposes of computing weighted-average exercise prices in column (b) as they do not have an exercise price.
(2)The number of securities remaining available for future issuance in column (c) includes 27,011 shares of Class A common stock.

Plan Category

 

Number of

Securities to be

Issued upon

Exercise of

Outstanding

Options,

Warrants and

Rights

 

 

Weighted

Average

Exercise Price

of

Outstanding

Options,

Warrants and

Rights

 

 

Number of

Securities

Remaining

Available for

Future Issuances

under Equity

Compensation Plans

(excluding

securities in column

(a))

 

 

 

(a)

 

 

(b)

 

 

(c)

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share amount)

 

Equity compensation plans

   approved by security holders (1)

 

 

26,792

 

 

$

4.59

 

 

 

12,202

 

Equity compensation plans not

   approved by security holders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

26,792

 

 

$

4.59

 

 

 

12,202

 

(1)

The number of securities remaining available for future issuance in column (c) includes 12,202 shares of Class A common stock authorized and available for issuance under our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (“2017 Plan”). The number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2017 Plan are subject to an annual increase. Restricted stock units and warrants have been excluded for purposes of computing weighted average exercise prices in column (b).

stock available for issuance under our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”) and 5,089 shares of Class A common stock available for issuance under our 2017 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2017 Plan is subject to an annual increase.

48



Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The selected consolidated financial data below should be read in conjunction with the [Reserved]

Item 7, “Management’s7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and December 26, 2015, and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are derived from our audited financial statements appearing in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated balance sheet data as of December 26, 2015 is derived from audited financial statements not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in any future period.

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

December 26,

2015

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Player

 

$

287,407

 

 

$

293,929

 

 

$

269,977

 

Platform

 

 

225,356

 

 

 

104,720

 

 

 

49,880

 

Total net revenue

 

 

512,763

 

 

 

398,649

 

 

 

319,857

 

Cost of revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Player (1)

 

 

258,104

 

 

 

249,821

 

 

 

221,416

 

Platform (1)

 

 

54,826

 

 

 

27,783

 

 

 

8,663

 

Total cost of revenue

 

 

312,930

 

 

 

277,604

 

 

 

230,079

 

Gross profit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Player

 

 

29,303

 

 

 

44,108

 

 

 

48,561

 

Platform

 

 

170,530

 

 

 

76,937

 

 

 

41,217

 

Total gross profit

 

 

199,833

 

 

 

121,045

 

 

 

89,778

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development (1)

 

 

107,945

 

 

 

76,177

 

 

 

50,469

 

Sales and marketing (1)

 

 

64,069

 

 

 

52,888

 

 

 

45,153

 

General and administrative (1)

 

 

47,435

 

 

 

35,341

 

 

 

31,708

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

219,449

 

 

 

164,406

 

 

 

127,330

 

Loss from operations

 

 

(19,616

)

 

 

(43,361

)

 

 

(37,552

)

Other income (expense), net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

 

(1,612

)

 

 

146

 

 

 

(696

)

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

(2,338

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of preferred stock warrant

   liability

 

 

(40,333

)

 

 

888

 

 

 

(1,768

)

Other income (expense), net

 

 

705

 

 

 

(220

)

 

 

(448

)

Loss before income taxes

 

 

(63,194

)

 

 

(42,547

)

 

 

(40,464

)

Income tax expense

 

 

315

 

 

 

211

 

 

 

147

 

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

 

$

(63,509

)

 

$

(42,758

)

 

$

(40,611

)

Net loss per share attributable to common

   stockholders— basic and diluted (2)

 

$

(2.24

)

 

$

(9.01

)

 

$

(10.08

)

Weighted-average shares used in computing net loss

   per share attributable to common

   stockholders—basic and diluted

 

 

28,308

 

 

 

4,746

 

 

 

4,030

 


Operations

(1)

Stock-based compensation was allocated as follows:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

December 26,

2015

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Cost of player revenue

 

$

145

 

 

$

136

 

 

$

90

 

Cost of platform revenue

 

 

81

 

 

 

224

 

 

 

54

 

Research and development

 

 

4,714

 

 

 

2,766

 

 

 

1,685

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

2,817

 

 

 

2,292

 

 

 

1,678

 

General and administrative

 

 

3,196

 

 

 

2,788

 

 

 

1,777

 

Total stock-based compensation

 

$

10,953

 

 

$

8,206

 

 

$

5,284

 

(2)

See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for an explanation of the calculations of basic and diluted net loss per common share.

 

 

As of

 

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

December 26,

2015

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

$

177,250

 

 

$

34,562

 

 

$

75,748

 

Total assets

 

 

371,897

 

 

 

179,078

 

 

 

176,511

 

Preferred stock warrant liability

 

 

 

 

 

9,990

 

 

 

10,878

 

Long-term debt, including current portion

 

 

 

 

 

15,000

 

 

 

15,000

 

Total liabilities

 

 

219,618

 

 

 

159,722

 

 

 

123,067

 

Convertible preferred stock

 

 

 

 

 

213,180

 

 

 

213,180

 

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)

 

 

152,279

 

 

 

(193,824

)

 

 

(159,736

)


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in Item 8 of this document. ThisAnnual Report. In addition to historical financial information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates, beliefs, and expectations, and involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed below. Factors that could cause or contribute to suchthese differences include but are not limited to, those identifieddiscussed below and those discussed aboveelsewhere in this Annual Report, particularly in the section entitled “Risk Factors.”

Prior to 2017, ourtitled Item 1A. Risk Factors and the Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.

This section of this Annual Report generally discusses fiscal years 2021 and 2020 and year-to-year comparisons between those years. Discussions of fiscal year was the 52- or 53-week period that ended on the last Saturday of December. Our2019 and year-to-year comparisons between fiscal years 20152020 and 20162019 that are not included in this Annual Report can be found in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report for the fiscal year ended on December 26, 2015 and December 31, 2016, respectively. In 2017, we changed2020 filed with the SEC on February 26, 2021.
Overview
We operate in two reportable segments: the platform segment and the player segment. Platform revenue is generated from the sale of digital advertising and related services including our fiscal year-endOneView ad platform, content distribution services (such as subscription and transaction revenue shares, media and entertainment promotional spending, the sale of Premium Subscriptions, and the sale of branded channel buttons on remote controls), and licensing arrangements with service operators and TV brands.
Player revenue is generated primarily from the sale of streaming players and audio products. We expect to matchcontinue to manage the calendar year-end. Fiscal year 2015 spanned 52 weeks and fiscal year 2016 spanned 53 weeks.

Overview

average selling prices (“ASP”) of our streaming players to increase our active accounts. We pioneered streamingexpect that the trade off from player gross profit or loss to the TV. We connect users to the streaming content they love, enable content publishers to build and monetize large audiences, and provide advertisers with unique capabilities to engage consumers. We do this at scale today. As of December 31, 2017, we had 19.3 milliongrow active accounts will result in increased platform revenue and duringplatform gross profit.

COVID-19 Update
The widespread global impact from the COVID-19 pandemic continued through 2021. Governmental authorities have put in place various precautionary measures and promoted vaccination programs to slow down the spread of the virus. The impact of the pandemic continues to vary by geography as well as over time as different variants of the virus surface. The majority of our workforce continues to work from home to protect the health and safety of our employees, and business travel continues to be curtailed. We evaluate and refine our return to office strategy by geography as circumstances change. We expect that most employees will adopt a hybrid work schedule (consisting of both in-person work and working from home) in 2022.
The COVID-19 pandemic, and the resulting precautionary measures, have caused, and are expected to continue to cause, economic uncertainty both in the United States and globally as well as significant volatility in, and disruption to, financial markets and supply chains. Global supply chain disruptions have resulted in shipping delays, increased shipping costs, component shortages, and increases in component prices. In addition, some of our TV brand partners have faced inventory challenges that have negatively impacted their unit sales.
The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the shift of TV viewing away from legacy TV to streaming TV. During the year ended December 31, 2017, our users streamed 14.8 billion hours on the Roku platform. TV streaming’s disruptive content distribution model is shifting billions of dollars of economic value. We are capitalizing on this large economic opportunity as a leading TV streaming platform for users, content publishers and advertisers.

Consumers win with TV streaming—they get a better user experience, more entertainment options and more control over what they spend on content. When users want2021, we continued to enjoy streaming entertainment, they start at the Roku home screen where we put users first by helping them find the content they want to watch. From our home screen, users can easily search, discover and access over 500,000 movies and TV episodessee an increase in the United States, as well as live sports, music, news and more. Users can also compare the price of content from various channels available on our platform and choose from ad-supported, subscription, and transactional video on-demand content. The Roku platform delivers a significant expansion in consumer choice. Consumers can personalize their content selection with cable TV replacement offerings and streaming services that suit their budget and needs.

We operate the number one TV streaming platform in the United States as measured by total hours streamed, according to a survey that we commissioned, conducted in the fourth quarter of 2017, by Kantar Millward Brown. Content publishers and advertisers win with Roku because our large and growing user base simplifies their access to the fragmented and complex over the top, or OTT, market and we provide them with direct to consumer engagement and monetization opportunities. We provide our content publishers with access to the most engaged OTT audience, as measured by average hours streamed and the ability to monetize their content with advertising, subscription or transactional business models. Advertisers on our platform can reach our desirable OTT audience with ads that are more relevant, interactive and measurable than advertising delivered on traditional linear TV. Our growth in active accounts and hours streamed attracts more content publishers and advertisers to our TV streaming platform, creating a better user experience, which in turn attracts more users. As our platform improves for users, content publishers and advertisers, we grow average revenue per user, or ARPU, which we define as our platform revenue during the preceding four quarters divided by the average of the number of active accounts at, but the end of that period and the end ofgrowth rate was slower than in the prior four quarters.

While we currently generate a majorityyear. Active accounts increased to 60.1 million as of our revenue from sales of our streaming players, our business model is to grow gross profit by increasing the number of active accounts andDecember 31, 2021, growing ARPU, which we believe represents the inherent value of our business model. We grow new accounts through three primary channels: we sell streaming players, we partner with TV brands through our Roku TV licensing program, and we have licensing relationships with service operators. The fastest growing source of new accounts comes from our licensing partner relationships which accounted for 48% of new accounts in 2017, up from 42% in 2016. We believe we have a significant opportunity to grow platform revenue and as we further monetize TV streaming17% year-over-year. Streaming hours we will increase ARPU. ARPU was $13.78 for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared2021 increased to $9.2873.2 billion, growing 25% year-over-year.

We have largely been able to maintain an inventory of our players, audio products, and accessories in stock at retailers and online stores throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. However, like many companies, we have been negatively affected by the constraints in the global supply chain, which have resulted in shortages of certain components, increased component costs, shipping constraints, and increased shipping costs. Player unit sales were down in the second half of 2021, year-over-year, due to the demand spike in the second half of 2020 because of the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2021, we insulated our customers from the rising player-related costs and prioritized account acquisition growth, which strategically supports our Average Revenue per User (“ARPU”) growth. The increasing component costs put additional constraints on our player gross margin resulting in a gross loss in the player segment for the year ended December 31, 2016,2021. Though we do not believe that the cost constraints and supply chain issues are permanent, they may continue to impact us in the near future, and we expect player gross margin to be negative until such conditions normalize.
49


Our platform segment continues to perform well, with platform revenue increasing to $2,284.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, reflecting year-over-year growth of 80%. Our ARPU grew to $41.03, up 43% year-over-year. Almost every major media company has reorganized around streaming and, as a result, our content distribution business has benefited as our active accounts growth was accompanied by continued consumer demand for both ad-supported and subscription services, and increased media and entertainment promotional spending by our content partners. We believe advertising budgets will continue to shift from legacy TV to streaming TV and that we will benefit from this shift due to our advanced advertising capabilities. During the fourth quarter of 2021, however, certain advertising verticals experienced supply chain disruptions that negatively impacted product availability and resulted in reduced advertising spend. While we have experienced an increase of 48%. Our success in growing ARPUTV streaming during the COVID-19 pandemic and our business generally has benefited, there can be no assurance that these patterns will depend on our ability to increase platform revenue from content publishers and advertisers as we grow the number of active accounts.

We generate player revenue from the sale of streaming players. As users engage with our platform, we earn platform revenue from the sale of advertising, content distribution fees, billing services and licensing activities.  

continue into 2022.

Key Performance Metrics

We use the following

The key performance metrics we use to evaluate our business, measure our performance, develop financial forecasts and make strategic decisions. Our key performance metricsdecisions are gross profit, active accounts, streaming hours, streamed and average revenue per user.

ARPU.

Gross Profit

We measure the performance of our business usinguse gross profit and we are focused on increasing gross profit. We currently generate positive gross profit on player revenue, however, the majority of our gross profit is generated from platform revenue. We believe gross profit isas the primary metric to measure the performance of our business because we have two revenue segments withthat have different margin profiles, and we aim to maximize our highhigher margin platform revenue from our active accounts as they stream content on our platform.

Substantially all of our gross profit is generated from our platform segment.

Our gross profit was $199.8 million, $121.0$1,408.6 million and $89.8$808.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021 and December 26, 2015, respectively.

2020, respectively, reflecting an increase of 74%.

Active Accounts

We believe that the number of active accounts is a relevant measure to gauge the size of our user base. We define active accounts as the number of distinct user accounts that have streamed content on our platform within the last 30 days of the period. Users who streamed content from The Roku Channel only on non-Roku platforms are not included in this metric. The number of active accounts also does not correspond to the number of unique individuals who actively utilize our platform, or the number of devices associated with an account. For example, a single account may be used by more than one individual, such as a family, and one account may usebe used on multiple streaming devices.
We had 60.1 million and 51.2 million active accounts as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively reflecting an increase of 17%.
Hours Streamed
We believe that the number of active accounts is a relevant measure to gauge the size of our user base and the opportunity to increase our platform revenue and gross profit.

We had 19.3 million, 13.4 million and 9.2 million active accounts at the end of December 31, 2017, 2016 and December 26, 2015, respectively.

Hours Streamed

We definestreaming hours streamed as the aggregate amount of time users streamed content on our platform in a given period. We report hours streamed on a calendar basis. We believe the usage of our platform is an effective measure of user engagement and that the growth in the number of hours of content streamed across our platform reflects our success in addressing the growing user demand for TV streaming. We define streaming hours as the aggregate amount of time streaming devices stream content on our platform in a given period. Hours streamed from The Roku Channel on non-Roku platforms are not included in this metric. We report streaming hours on a calendar basis.

Additionally, we believe that over time, increasing user engagement on our streaming platform increases our platform monetization because we earn platform revenue from various forms of user engagement, including advertising, as well as revenue shares from subscriptions and transactional video on-demand. However, our revenuesrevenue from content providers arepublishers is not tied to the hours streamed on their streaming channels, and the number of streaming hours streamed does not correlate to revenue earned from such content providerspublishers or ARPU on a period-by-period basis. Additionally, we believe increasing user engagementMoreover, streaming hours on our platform are measured whenever a Roku player or a Roku TV is streaming content, whether a viewer is actively watching or not. For example, if a Roku player is connected to a TV, and the viewer turns off the TV, steps away, or falls asleep and does not stop or pause the player, then the particular streaming channel may continue to play content for a period of time determined by the streaming channel. We believe that this also occurs across a wide variety of non-Roku streaming devices and other set-top boxes.
Since the first quarter of 2020, all of our devices include a Roku OS feature that is designed to identify when content has been continuously streaming on a channel for an extended period of time without user interaction. This feature, which we refer to as “Are you still watching,” periodically prompts the user to confirm that they are still watching the selected channel and closes the channel if the user does not respond affirmatively. We believe that the implementation of this feature across the Roku platform increasesbenefits us, our gross profit because we earn platform revenue from advertising as well as from revenue shares from subscriptioncustomers, channel partners, and transactional video on-demand.

advertisers. Some of our leading channel

50


partners, including Netflix, also have implemented similar features within their channels. This Roku OS feature supplements these channel features. This feature has not had and is not expected to have a material impact on our future financial performance.
We streamed 14.8 billion, 9.473.2 billion and 5.558.7 billion hourshours during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively reflecting an increase of 25%.
Note About Our Streaming Hours Adjustments
To calculate and report our streaming hours, we utilize data from event logs generated by the firmware running on the Roku devices that are recorded in a central database. The event information (play, pause, stop, time counts, etc.) is generated by the firmware running on the Roku streaming devices, and event data is transmitted to our central database at regular intervals when a device is connected to the internet. Pause time is not intended to be included in streaming hours.
During the second quarter of 2020 we discovered that some pause time was inadvertently included in the streaming hours information recorded in our central database. Upon discovering these errors in the log data, we promptly reviewed and analyzed the issue utilizing our firmware, data engineering and core analytics teams. We concluded that certain past Roku OS releases inadvertently caused the logging errors. The error rates varied over time and across different types of devices and firmware versions. As a result, we reported higher streaming hours and streaming hours growth rates for the affected periods than we would have if all pause time had been excluded from streaming hours as we had intended. Neither these logging errors, nor the resulting adjustments that we made to our streaming hours calculations, has had any impact on our financial results, and do not require us to revise any of our previously reported key operating metrics other than streaming hours.
The affected log data was for the periods from February 2016 to August 2020. After adjusting for logging errors, we estimate that our streaming hours were, on average, approximately 0.5% lower than previously reported for the period January 2017 through September 2018, and approximately 5.8% lower for the period October 2018 through March 2020.
By the end of August 2020, we fully deployed a software update that addressed the root cause of the pause time logging errors and prevented them from continuing.
The roll out of the “Are you still watching” feature had no impact on the adjustments we made to our streaming hours calculations. While our revenue from content publishers is not based on the hours streamed on their streaming channels, and the number of streaming hours does not directly correlate to revenue earned from such content publishers or ARPU on a period-by-period basis; we believe that the growth in the number of hours of content streamed across our platform reflects our success in addressing the growing user demand for TV streaming. After adjusting our streaming hours as discussed above, our estimated year-over-year streaming hour growth rates for fiscal year 2018 versus fiscal year 2017, fiscal year 2019 versus fiscal year 2018, and the first quarter of 2020 versus the first quarter of 2019 were 60.5%, 59.3%, and 46.8%, respectively. The estimated year-over-year streaming hour growth rate for the second quarter of 2020 versus the second quarter of 2019 was 65%.
The following table presents the estimated impacts on streaming hours (in billions) for periods from January 1, 2017 through March 31, 2020 and streaming hours growth rates on a year-over-year (“YoY”) basis by quarter for periods from January 1, 2018 through March 31, 2020 and annually for fiscal year 2018 and 2019. Revised streaming hours for 2016 are not estimated and December 26, 2015, respectively.  

therefore revised 2017 YoY growth rates are not available.

51


QuarterPublished SHsRevised SHsSHs % DeltaPublished YoYRevised YoY
2017 Q13.3B3.2B(0.5)%63.4%NA
2017 Q23.5B3.5B(0.4)%60.0%NA
2017 Q33.8B3.8B(0.4)%57.8%NA
2017 Q44.3B4.3B(0.2)%55.3%NA
2018 Q15.1B5.1B(0.5)%56.0%56.1%
2018 Q25.5B5.4B(0.5)%57.2%57.0%
2018 Q36.2B6.1B(0.7)%62.7%62.1%
2018 Q47.3B7.1B(2.2)%68.6%65.2%
2019 Q18.9B8.4B(5.4)%74.1%65.5%
2019 Q29.4B8.8B(6.0)%72.1%62.6%
2019 Q310.3B9.6B(6.5)%67.6%57.9%
2019 Q411.7B10.9B(6.3)%60.2%53.7%
2020 Q113.2B12.3B(7.0)%49.3%46.8%
      
YearPublished SHsRevised SHsSHs % DeltaPublished YoYRevised YoY
201714.8B14.8B(0.4)%58.8%NA
201824.0B23.7B(1.1)%61.7%60.5%
201940.3B37.8B(6.1)%67.8%59.3%
Average Revenue per User

We measure our platform monetization progress with ARPU, which we believe represents the inherent value of our business. We define ARPU as our platform revenue duringfor the precedingtrailing four quarters divided by the average of the number of active accounts at the end of thatthe current period and the end of the corresponding period in the prior four quarters. We measure progress in our platform business usingyear. ARPU because it helps us understandmeasures the rate at which we are monetizing our active account base.

Our base and the progress of our platform business.

ARPU was $13.78, $9.28 and $6.48 at the end$41.03 as of December 31, 2017, 20162021 as compared to $28.76 as of December 31, 2020.
Components of Results of Operations
Revenue
Platform Revenue
We generate platform revenue from digital advertising sales and December 26, 2015, respectively.


Factors Affecting Our Performance

Rate of TV streamingrelated services including our OneView ad platform, content distribution services (such as subscription and advertising shift to OTT

Consumers have significantly shifted their TV viewing behavior,transaction revenue sharing arrangements,media and we believe all TV content will be available through streaming. Therefore, we also believe this presents a large market opportunity for streaming TV advertising. This is a critical component of our business model because our platform and player revenue, as well as our overall expense structure, is dependent on this shift. In addition, the number of hours streamed on our platform is a critical element of our business because hours determine our advertising inventory and sell through.

User acquisition strategy

Consumers become our users through three primary channels: Roku players, Roku TVs, or through licensing relationship with service operators. We monetize our user base through platform revenue. Player revenue and player gross profit may decrease over time as we strategically aim to acquire new customers through low cost player solutions. Even though the gross profit earned fromentertainment promotional spending, the sale of our players is low, we currently earn a positive gross profit which is similar to a “negative” user acquisition cost.

Ability to growPremium Subscriptions, and retain streaming hours

Growththe sale of branded channel buttons on remote controls), and licensing arrangements with service operators and TV brands. Our ad inventory includes video ad inventory from AVOD content in platform revenue, gross profit and ARPU will depend on growth in streaming hours. We intend to increase user engagement and hours streamed by offering more content that is easier to find and discover. By increasing the available content on our platform and making it easily accessible, we have diversified the type of content streamed. When we launched the first Netflix player in 2008, Netflix accounted for 100% of our streaming hours, and with the proliferation of different channels on our platform, our reliance on any particular channel partner has continued to decline.

Ability to monetize users and streaming hours

Our business model depends on our ability to monetize user engagement with our platform. Content publishers distribute streaming content through subscription video on demand, or SVOD, advertising video on demand, or AVOD, and transactional video on demand, or TVOD models. Some content publishers utilize a combination of models. The majority of our streaming hours to date have been SVOD hours, in line with the current OTT market, where we can earn revenue from subscription revenue share or fromRoku Channel, native display ads on our home screen orand screen saver, but we do not monetize hours streamed. The fastest growing content monetization is AVOD, where we can monetize hours with video ads delivered to users as they stream content. We believe Roku is an important platform for advertising dollars that will be redeployed from traditional TV. Our ability to leverage our data to provide users with relevant ads and measure the effectiveness of these advertisements on our platform is also a key factor to an increased wallet share of advertising budgets spent on our platform. We evaluate the effectiveness of our AVOD offerings using a wide variety of metrics, including exposure (e.g., reach, frequency and video completion rates); demographics (e.g., what types of users we believe were exposed, including age, gender and income); top-funnel brand impact (e.g., aided/unaided recall, brand perception and purchase intent); and bottom-funnel brand impact (e.g., website visitation, store visitation and actual purchase). We conduct this evaluation through a combination of internal data and data collected through partnerships with outside research firms, all leveraging our knowledge of individual users and the fact that we serve ads on a 1:1 basis. When promoting content, such as through audience development, our typical metrics are ad impressions and clicks, channel downloads, visits, subscription trials, time spent in the channel and retention. While we have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, growth in our advertising revenue as we have expanded our user base and streaming hours, our efforts to monetize our platform through AVOD content are still developing and our revenue from AVOD offerings may not grow as we expect. This means of monetization will require us to continue to attract advertising dollars to our platform as well as deliver AVODad inventory we obtain through our content distribution agreements with publishers. To supplement supply, we re-sell video inventory that appeals to users.

Continued investment in growth

We believe that our future performance will depend on the success of the investments we have made, and will continue to make, to improve the value for users,purchase from content publishers and, advertisersto a lesser extent, directly sell third-party inventory on a revenue share basis. To date, we have generated most of our platform. We must regularly update and enrich the Roku platform to meet evolving consumer behavior and deliver a superior user


experience. Further, it is important that we remain a frictionless platform for content delivery and invest to provide content publishers with best-in-class publishing tools and actionable audience insights. We must continue to innovate and invest in our advertising capabilities and technology so that we attract and encourage incremental advertising spend on our platform.

Competition

The market for streaming media is continuing to grow and evolve. We face substantial competition from large technology and consumer electronics companies, including Amazon, Apple and Google. These competitors have increased consumer awareness of TV streaming and contributed to the growth of the overall market, but their resources and brand recognition pose significant competitive challenges. Our success in capitalizing on the expanding opportunitiesrevenue in the streaming market will depend on our ability to continue to deliver high quality devices at competitive prices, in the face of this competition.

Seasonality

We generate significantly higher levels of revenue and gross profit in the fourth quarter of the year. While both platform and player revenue experience seasonality, player revenue has historically been more seasonal than platform revenue, driven by the holiday shopping season. Fourth quarter revenue comprised 37% of our total net revenue for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and fourth quarter gross profit comprised 37% of our total gross profit for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Components of Results of Operations

Revenue

United States.

Player Revenue

We generate player revenue primarily from the sale of streaming players through consumer retail distribution channels, including major brick and mortar retailers, such as Best Buy and Walmart, and online retailers, primarily Amazon.com. In our international markets, we sell our players through wholesale distributors which, in turn, sell to retailers. We currently distribute our players in Canada, the United Kingdom, France, the Republic of Ireland and several Latin American countries.including Amazon. We generate most of our player revenue in the United States.

In our international markets, we primarily sell our players through wholesale distributors which, in turn, re-sell to retailers. We currently distribute our players in various countries in North America, South America, and Europe.

Player revenue also includes the sale of our audio products, including wireless speakers, smart soundbars and wireless subwoofers.
52


Cost of Platform Revenue

We generate

Cost of platform revenue fromprimarily consists of costs associated with acquiring advertising sales, subscriptioninventory and transactionamortization costs of content, both licensed and produced. Cost of platform revenue share, sales of branded channel buttons on remote controls and licensing arrangementsalso includes other costs such as payment processing fees, allocated expenses associated with TV brands and service operators. We generate mostthe delivery of our services that primarily include costs of third-party cloud services and salaries, benefits, and stock-based compensation for our platform revenue in the United States. Our first-party video ad inventory includes native display ads on our home screenoperations personnel, and screen saver, as well as ad inventory made available to us through our content publisher agreements. To satisfy existing demand, we can sell video advertising that we purchase from content publishers to supplement our first-party video ad inventory, and to a lesser extent, third-party video advertising on a revenue share basis from content publishers in our Roku Direct Publisher program.

Costamortization of Revenue

acquired developed technology.

Cost of Player Revenue

Cost of player revenue is comprised mostly of player manufacturing costs for streaming players and audio products payable to our third-party contract manufacturer,manufacturers and technology licenses or royalty fees,fees. Cost of player revenue also includes inbound and outbound freight, duty and logistics costs, third-party packaging, inventory reserves, and assembly costs, warranty costs, write-down for excess and obsolete inventory, allocated overhead costs related to facilities and customer support, and salary, benefit and stock-based compensation costs for operations personnel.


Cost of Platform Revenue

Cost of platform revenue consists of advertising inventory acquisition costs, payment processing fees, third-party cloud service fees and allocated personnel-related costs, including salaries, benefits, and stock-based compensation for Roku personnel that support platform services, including advertising and billing operations customer service, and our TV brands and our service operator licensees. We anticipate that cost of platform revenue will increase in absolute dollars.

personnel.

Operating and Other Expenses

Research and Development

Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel-related costs, including employee salaries, benefits, and stock-based compensation for our engineers and other employees engaged in the development of our products including new technologies and features and functionality.teams as well as outsourced development fees. In addition, research and development expenses include allocated facilities and overhead costs. We believe continued investment is important to attaining our strategic objectives and expect research and development expenses to increase in absolute dollars foras we continue to invest in the foreseeable future.

development of our platform and player products and services.

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of personnel-related costs, including salaries, benefits, commissions, and stock-based compensation expense for our employees engaged in sales and sales support, marketing, communications, data science and analytics, business development, product management, marketing, communications, and partner and customer support functions. Sales and marketing expenses also include costs for marketing, retail and public relations, channel merchandising including point of purchase and in-store displays, trade shows and other events, professional services,costs, and allocated facilities and other overhead.overhead expenses. We expect our sales and marketing expenses to increase in absolute dollars in future periods as we continue to growfocus on growing active accounts, platform and player revenue, and expanding our business.

business internationally.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel-related costs, including salaries, benefits, and stock-based compensation for our executive, finance, legal, information technology, human resources, and other administrative personnel. General and administrative expenses also include outside legal, accounting, and other professional service fees as well as allocated facility expenses. We expect our general and administrative expenses to increase due to the anticipated growthexpansion of our business and related infrastructure as well as accounting, legal, insurance, investor relations and other costs associated with being a public company.

infrastructure.

Other Income (Expense), Net

Our

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, other income (expense), net consists primarily of changes ininterest income on cash and cash equivalents, income recognized related to non-cash consideration associated with the fair valuedelivery of our convertible preferred stock warrant liability,services as part of a strategic commercial arrangement, interest expense that includes interest expense on our debt and amortization of deferred debt costs, foreign currency re-measurement, and transaction gains and losses. Prior to our IPO, the underlying shares of our convertible preferred stock warrants were contingently redeemable and we accounted for these warrants as a liability at fair value and re-measured the fair value at each balance sheet date. Any change in the fair value was recognized as other income (expense), net in our consolidated statement of operations, until the earlier of the exercise of the warrants, or the completion of a deemed liquidation event, including an IPO. At the closing of our IPO, the convertible preferred stock warrant liability was reclassified to stockholders’ equity and the re-measurement was no longer required.

Income Tax (Benefit) Expense

Our income tax (benefit) expense consists primarily of income taxes in certain foreign jurisdictions where we conduct business and state minimum income taxes in the United States. We have a valuation allowance for U.S. and Netherlands deferred tax assets, including net operating loss carryforwards andcarryforwards. U.S. deferred tax assets include tax credits related primarily to research and development. We expect to maintain this valuation allowance for the foreseeable future.


53



Results of Operations

The following table sets forth selected consolidated statements of operations data as a percentage of total revenue for each of the periods indicated.

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

December 26,

2015

 

Net Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Player

 

 

56

%

 

 

74

%

 

 

84

%

Platform

 

 

44

%

 

 

26

%

 

 

16

%

Total net revenue

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

Cost of Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Player

 

 

50

%

 

 

63

%

 

 

69

%

Platform

 

 

11

%

 

 

7

%

 

 

3

%

Total cost of revenue

 

 

61

%

 

 

70

%

 

 

72

%

Gross Profit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Player

 

 

6

%

 

 

11

%

 

 

15

%

Platform

 

 

33

%

 

 

19

%

 

 

13

%

Total gross profit

 

 

39

%

 

 

30

%

 

 

28

%

Operating Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development

 

 

21

%

 

 

19

%

 

 

16

%

Sales and marketing

 

 

13

%

 

 

13

%

 

 

14

%

General and administrative

 

 

9

%

 

 

9

%

 

 

10

%

Total operating expenses

 

 

43

%

 

 

41

%

 

 

40

%

Loss from Operations

 

 

(4

)%

 

 

(11

)%

 

 

(12

)%

Other Income (Expense), Net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

 

(0

)%

 

 

0

%

 

 

(0

)%

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

(1

)%

 

 

(—

)%

 

 

(—

)%

Change in fair value of preferred stock

   warrant liability

 

 

(8

)%

 

 

0

%

 

 

(1

)%

Other income (expense), net

 

 

0

%

 

 

(0

)%

 

 

(0

)%

Total other income (expense), net

 

 

(9

)%

 

 

0

%

 

 

(1

)%

Loss before income taxes

 

 

(13

)%

 

 

(11

)%

 

 

(13

)%

Income tax expense

 

 

0

%

 

 

0

%

 

 

0

%

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

 

 

(13

)%

 

 

(11

)%

 

 

(13

)%

 Years Ended December 31,
202120202019
Net Revenue:
Platform83 %71 %66 %
Player17 %29 %34 %
Total net revenue100 %100 %100 %
Cost of Revenue:
Platform30 %28 %23 %
Player19 %27 %33 %
Total cost of revenue49 %55 %56 %
Gross Profit (Loss):
Platform53 %43 %43 %
Player(2)%%%
Total gross profit51 %45 %44 %
Operating Expenses:
Research and development17 %20 %24 %
Sales and marketing16 %17 %16 %
General and administrative%10 %10 %
Total operating expenses42 %47 %50 %
Income (Loss) from Operations%(2)%(6)%
Other Income (Expense), Net:
Interest expense— %— %— %
Other income (expense), net— %— %%
Total other income (expense), net— %— %%
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes%(2)%(5)%
Income tax benefit— %— %— %
Net Income (Loss)%(2)%(5)%
Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 20172021 and 2016

2020

Net Revenue

 

Year Ended

 

 

Change $

 

 

Change %

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20212020Change $Change %

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

(in thousands, except percentages)(in thousands, except percentages)
PlatformPlatform$2,284,925 $1,267,744 $1,017,181 80 %

Player

 

$

287,407

 

 

$

293,929

 

 

$

(6,522

)

 

 

(2

)%

Player479,659 510,644 (30,985)(6)%

Platform

 

 

225,356

 

 

 

104,720

 

 

 

120,636

 

 

 

115

%

Total Net Revenue

 

$

512,763

 

 

$

398,649

 

 

$

114,114

 

 

 

29

%

Total net revenueTotal net revenue$2,764,584 $1,778,388 $986,196 55 %


Platform

Player

Player

Platform revenue decreasedincreased by $6.5$1,017.2 million, or 2% for80%, during the year ended December 31, 20172021 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease was a result of a 22% decrease in the average selling prices while the volume of players sold increased2020, primarily attributable to higher content distribution services, including higher revenue from media and entertainment promotional spending and Premium Subscriptions, we well as higher advertising revenue which includes revenue from our OneView ad platform.
54


Player
Player revenue decreased by 25%. The increase in the volume of players and the reduction of average selling prices was mainly driven by the sale of our lower priced Roku Express which was introduced in the fall of 2016 and saw a full year of market share. An increase in various sales incentives also contributed to the lower average selling prices in$31.0 million, or 6%, during the year ended December 31, 2017.

Platform

Platform revenue increased by $120.6 million or 115% for the year ended December 31, 20172021 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. The majority2020, primarily due to a decrease in both the volume of the increase was drivenstreaming players sold and average selling prices, offset by our advertising and content and distribution services including subscription and transaction revenue totaling $119.3 million. This was achieved through expansion of our advertising inventory anda slight increase in numberrevenue from the sale of paid subscriptions. In addition, there was a $1.3 million increase in revenues from licensing arrangements.

Cost of Revenue

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

Change $

 

 

Change %

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

Cost of revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Player

 

$

258,104

 

 

$

249,821

 

 

$

8,283

 

 

 

3

%

Platform

 

 

54,826

 

 

 

27,783

 

 

 

27,043

 

 

 

97

%

Total Cost of Revenue

 

$

312,930

 

 

$

277,604

 

 

$

35,326

 

 

 

13

%

Gross profit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Player

 

$

29,303

 

 

$

44,108

 

 

$

(14,805

)

 

 

(34

)%

Platform

 

 

170,530

 

 

 

76,937

 

 

 

93,593

 

 

 

122

%

Total Gross Profit

 

$

199,833

 

 

$

121,045

 

 

$

78,788

 

 

 

65

%

Player

The cost of player revenue increased by $8.3 million or 3% foraudio products and accessories. During the year ended December 31, 20172021, the volume of streaming players sold decreased by 4% and the average selling price of players decreased by 7% as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.2020. The increase was mainly due to an increase of 25%decrease in the volume of players sold partially offset by a reductionis due to the slowdown in direct manufacturing costs and an increase of $7.9 milliongrowth in mostly air freight costs incurred to expedite inbound supply to minimize the effect of component supply disruptions.

Gross profit for player revenue decreased by $14.8 million or 34% for the year ended December 31, 20172021 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.2020 when the growth was aided by the COVID-19 pandemic. The decrease in the average selling price is due to lower average selling prices resulting from a combination of the increase in the sales mix of lower priced Roku Express and increases in sales incentiveshigher promotions during the year. Gross profit also decreased due to the increase of inbound air freight incurred to expedite inventory supply.

Platform

The cost of platform revenue increased by $27.0 million or 97% for the year ended December 31, 20172021 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. 2020 where the volume was aided by the COVID-19 pandemic and required fewer promotions.

Cost of Revenue
Years Ended December 31,
20212020Change $Change %
(in thousands, except percentages)
Cost of Revenue:
Platform$823,924 $503,177 $320,747 64 %
Player532,060 466,992 65,068 14 %
Total cost of revenue$1,355,984 $970,169 $385,815 40 %
Gross Profit (Loss):
Platform$1,461,001 $764,567 $696,434 91 %
Player(52,401)43,652 (96,053)(220)%
Total gross profit$1,408,600 $808,219 $600,381 74 %
Platform
The increase was due to higher inventory acquisition costs, advertisement serving costs and credit card processing fees totaling $18.5 million, increase in allocated overheadcost of $3.5 million and increase in licensing costs of $0.4 million due to growth in installed base.

Gross profit for platform revenue increased by $93.6$320.7 million, or 122% for64%, during the year ended December 31, 20172021 as compared to the year ended December 31, 20162020. This increase is primarily driven by higher advertising inventory costs, higher content amortization costs, Premium Subscription costs, and credit card processing fees totaling $303.1 million. Platform costs increased an additional $15.3 million due to significant growthincreases in advertising demandcloud services costs for supporting the platform and lower associatedhigher personnel costs.


Operating Expenses

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

Change $

 

 

Change %

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

Research and development

 

$

107,945

 

 

$

76,177

 

 

$

31,768

 

 

 

42

%

Sales and marketing

 

 

64,069

 

 

 

52,888

 

 

 

11,181

 

 

 

21

%

General and administrative

 

 

47,435

 

 

 

35,341

 

 

 

12,094

 

 

 

34

%

Total Operating Expenses

 

$

219,449

 

 

$

164,406

 

 

$

55,043

 

 

 

33

%

Research and development

Research and development expensesGross profit for platform revenue increased by $31.8$696.4 million, or 42% for91%, during the year ended December 31, 20172021 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. We incurred higher personnel costs of $28.0 million as a result of a 42% increase2020, primarily driven by the overall growth in headcount, higherour platform revenue.

Player
The cost of consulting and outside services of $3.2 million offset by a decrease in facilities expenses of $0.5 million.

Sales and marketing

Sales and marketing expensesplayer revenue increased by $11.2$65.1 million, or 21% for14%, during the year ended December 31, 20172021 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.2020. The increase is primarily due to higher personnel costproduct costs of $11.6$35.6 million, as a result of a 54%an increase in headcount,freight costs of $15.0 million, an increase in overhead costs such as cloud services, outsourced consulting services, and personnel costs totaling to $9.4 million, higher travel and entertainmentroyalty expenses of $0.9$5.7 million, and an increase in inventory reserves of $2.8 million offset by decreasea reduction in allocated overheadother manufacturing related costs of $3.3 million.

Gross profit for player revenue decreased by $2.1 million.

General and administrative

General and administrative expenses increased by $12.1$96.1 million, or 34% for220%, during the year ended December 31, 20172021 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.2020, resulting in a gross loss for fiscal year 2021. The increase is due toin costs was driven primarily by higher personnel cost of $5.3 milliondirect manufacturing costs for player products and accessories as a result of a 33% increasedisruptions in headcount,the global supply chain driving component prices higher, combined with reduced player revenue in 2021 as compared to 2020. We believe that the cost of consultingincreases and outside services of $4.0supply chain issues will continue in the near future, and we expect to incur negative gross margin in the player segment until such conditions normalize.

55


Operating Expenses
Years Ended December 31,
20212020Change $Change %
(in thousands, except percentages)
Research and development$461,602 $355,784 $105,818 30 %
Sales and marketing455,601 299,457 156,144 52 %
General and administrative256,297 173,231 83,066 48 %
Total operating expenses$1,173,500 $828,472 $345,028 42 %
Research and development
Research and development expenses increased by $105.8 million, and higher travel and entertainment expenses of $2.9 million.

Other Income (Expenses)or 30%, Net

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

Change $

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

Interest expense

 

$

(1,612

)

 

$

146

 

 

$

(1,758

)

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

$

(2,338

)

 

$

 

 

$

(2,338

)

Change in fair value of convertible preferred

   stock warrants

 

 

(40,333

)

 

 

888

 

 

 

(41,221

)

Other income (expense), net

 

 

705

 

 

 

(220

)

 

 

925

 

Total Other Income (Expense), Net

 

$

(43,578

)

 

$

814

 

 

$

(44,392

)

Other income (expenses), net

Other income (expenses), net increased forduring the year ended December 31, 20172021 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 mainly due to the increase in the fair value of preferred stock warrants of $41.2 million. During the year ended December 31, 2017, interest expense increased by $1.8 million due to a higher amount of debt that was outstanding during the year and $2.3 million of loss on extinguishment and early payment of debt.


Income Tax Expense

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

Change $

 

 

Change %

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

Income Tax Expense

 

$

315

 

 

$

211

 

 

$

104

 

 

 

49

%

Income tax expense

Income tax expense is comprised of foreign income tax and state minimum income taxes in the United States.

Comparison of years ended December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015

Net Revenue

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

Change $

 

 

Change %

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 26,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

Player

 

$

293,929

 

 

$

269,977

 

 

$

23,952

 

 

 

9

%

Platform

 

 

104,720

 

 

 

49,880

 

 

 

54,840

 

 

 

110

%

Total Net Revenue

 

$

398,649

 

 

$

319,857

 

 

$

78,792

 

 

 

25

%

Player

Player revenue increased by 9% to $293.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to $270.0 million for the year ended December 26, 2015.2020. The increase was driven primarily by an 18% increase in the volume of players sold, offset by a 10% decrease in average selling prices driven primarily by sales of our lower priced players.

Platform

Platform revenue increased by 110% to $104.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to $49.9 million for the year ended December 26, 2015. The increase wasis primarily due to higher advertising and subscription revenue share of $48.9 million, as we expanded our advertising sales operations and an increased revenue share from an increase of subscriptions through our platform. In addition, we generated an additional $4.6 millionincreases in fees earned from license arrangements with service operators.

Cost of Revenue

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

Change $

 

 

Change %

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 26,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

Cost of revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Player

 

$

249,821

 

 

$

221,416

 

 

$

28,405

 

 

 

13

%

Platform

 

 

27,783

 

 

 

8,663

 

 

 

19,120

 

 

 

221

%

Total Cost of Revenue

 

$

277,604

 

 

$

230,079

 

 

$

47,525

 

 

 

21

%

Gross profit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Player

 

$

44,108

 

 

$

48,561

 

 

$

(4,453

)

 

 

(9

)%

Platform

 

 

76,937

 

 

 

41,217

 

 

 

35,720

 

 

 

87

%

Total Gross Profit

 

$

121,045

 

 

$

89,778

 

 

$

31,267

 

 

 

35

%


Player

Cost of player revenue increased by 13% to $249.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to $221.4 million for the year ended December 26, 2015. Cost of player revenue increased on an absolute dollar basis primarily due to the 18% increase in the volume of players sold and, to a lesser extent, to increased provisions for inventory reserves and excess component liabilities, resulting from product transitions and to increased royalty costs arising from the execution of a patent and technology license agreement with a patent owner that included a release of potential claims for past liabilities. The increase in cost of player revenue was partially offset by a reduction in direct manufacturing costs for most players.

Gross profit on player sales decreased by 9% to $44.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to $48.6 million for the year ended December 26, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to higher volume mix of lower margin players in addition to the items noted above.

Platform

Cost of platform revenue increased by 221% to $27.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to $8.7 million for the year ended December 26, 2015. The increase was primarily due to higher costs incurred to acquire advertising inventory, an increase in credit card processing and other fees related to the growth of our platform billing services, and higher allocated overhead primarily in advertising operations, customer support, service operator support and third-party cloud service fees.

Gross profit on platform revenue increased by 87% to $76.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to $41.2 million for the year ended December 26, 2015.

Operating Expenses

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

Change $

 

 

Change %

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 26,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

Research and development

 

$

76,177

 

 

$

50,469

 

 

$

25,708

 

 

 

51

%

Sales and marketing

 

 

52,888

 

 

 

45,153

 

 

 

7,735

 

 

 

17

%

General and administrative

 

 

35,341

 

 

 

31,708

 

 

 

3,633

 

 

 

11

%

Total Operating Expenses

 

$

164,406

 

 

$

127,330

 

 

$

37,076

 

 

 

29

%

Research and development

Research and development expenses increased by 51% to $76.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to $50.5 million for the year ended December 26, 2015. The increase was primarily due to higher personnel-related costs of $19.3$84.3 million, as a result of the hiring of additionalincreased engineering headcount and platform development personnel, higher facility expenses of $5.3 million from our expanded engineering facilities in the United States, United Kingdom and China,related stock-based compensation, and higher consulting, expensesprofessional services, and cloud services costs of $1.1$17.4 million.

Sales and marketing

Sales and marketing expenses increased by 17% to $52.9$156.1 million, foror 52%, during the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to $45.2 million for the year ended December 26, 2015.31, 2020. The increase wasis primarily due to higherincreases in personnel-related costs of $8.5$91.4 million related to increased headcount and related stock-based compensation in sales and sales support, product management, marketing, and business analytics to support efforts to grow our business. Sales and marketing expenses also include an increase of $44.7 million mainly due to increases in advertising expenses to promote the Roku brand, marketing, retail and merchandising costs, and general sales promotions, an increase of $9.5 million in professional services and consulting fees, and an increase in facilities costs of $8.3 million due to an increase in headcount in connection with the expansion of our platform business and marketing, as well as $2.4 million of higher facilities expenses. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in product marketing spending.

office spaces.

General and administrative

General and administrative expenses increased by 11% to $35.3$83.1 million, in foror 48%, during the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to $31.7 million for the year ended December 26, 2015. The increase was primarily due to higher personnel-related costs of $5.3 million as a result of increased headcount in finance, legal and human resources, in addition to other professional and outside service expenses of $1.3 million. These increases were largely incurred to support the growth in our business. These increases were partially offset by the recovery of a bad debt originally written off in the year ended December 26, 2015.

Other Income (Expenses), Net

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

Change $

 

 

Change %

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 26,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

Interest expense

 

$

146

 

 

$

(696

)

 

$

842

 

 

 

(121

)%

Change in fair value of convertible preferred stock warrants

 

 

888

 

 

 

(1,768

)

 

 

2,656

 

 

 

(150

)%

Other income, net

 

 

(220

)

 

 

(448

)

 

 

228

 

 

 

(51

)%

Total Other Income (Expense), Net

 

$

814

 

 

$

(2,912

)

 

$

3,726

 

 

 

(128

)%

Other income (expense), net changed to a $0.8 million net credit for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to a $2.9 million net charge for the year ended December 26, 2015.2020. The change wasincrease is primarily due to lower expensesincreases in personnel-related costs of $50.0 million related to changes in fair valueincreased headcount and related stock-based compensation, an increase of warrants$28.3 million related to purchase convertible preferred stockhigher legal expenses, consulting, and professional services fees, and a decrease in interest expense duenet increase of $4.8 million related to lower balances on borrowings under ourhigher general overhead, business taxes, and similar costs offset by recoveries of credit facilities.

losses.

Other Income Tax Expense

(Expense), Net

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

Change $

 

 

Change %

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 26,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

Income Tax Expense

 

$

211

 

 

$

147

 

 

$

64

 

 

 

44

%

Years Ended December 31,
20212020Change $Change %
(in thousands, except percentages)
Interest expense$(2,980)$(3,432)$452 (13)%
Other income (expense), net4,467 5,233 (766)(15)%
Total other income (expense), net$1,487 $1,801 $(314)(17)%

The increase in

Other income tax expense for(expense), net
Total other income (expense), net, decreased by $0.3 million, or 17%, during the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2020. The decrease was primarily duedriven by foreign exchange losses of $2.5 million and lower interest income of $1.4 million from a decline in interest rates, which impacted our investment yields. This was offset by $3.1 million of other income recognized related to non-cash consideration associated with the delivery of services for a strategic commercial arrangement and decreased interest expense of $0.5 million.
56


Income Tax Benefit
Years Ended December 31,
20212020Change $Change %
(in thousands, except percentages)
Income tax benefit$(5,798)$(945)$(4,853)514 %
Income tax benefit
Income tax benefit increased by $4.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2020, driven primarily by stock-based compensation excess tax benefits, increased losses in a foreign income taxesjurisdiction with no valuation allowance, and higher state minimum income taxesa tax rate change in the United States.

a foreign jurisdiction.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2017,2021, we had cash balances totaling $177.3and cash equivalents of $2,146.0 million.

Prior to our IPO, we financed our operations primarily through cash generated from operations, private sales of equity and debt securities and borrowings under our credit facilities. In October 2017, as a result of our IPO, we received cash proceeds of $134.8 million net of underwriting discounts and commissions but before deducting other offering expenses. Our primary source of liquidity is cash generated through operating and financing activities. Our primary uses of cash include operating costs such as personnel-related expenses and capital spending. Our future capital requirements may vary materially from those currently planned and will depend on many factors including our growth rate and the continuing market acceptance of our players, advertising platform and other platform services, headcount, the timing and extent of spending to support development efforts, the introduction of new players and platform features, the expansion of sales and marketing activities, as well as overall economic conditions.


We may contemplate and engage in additional merger and acquisition activity that could materially impact our liquidity and capital resource position. We believe that our existing cash balance together with amounts available under our credit facility will be sufficient to fund our working capital and meet our anticipated cash needs for the foreseeable future.

As of December 31, 2017, less Less than 1% of our cash was held outside the United States. These amounts were primarilyStates in accounts held in Europe and are utilized to fund our foreign operations. The amount of unremitted earnings related toby our foreign subsidiaries, iswhich are used to fund foreign operations.

Our primary sources of cash are receipts from platform and player revenue and proceeds from equity sales, including equity issued pursuant to our employee equity incentive plans. The primary uses of cash are costs of revenue, including costs to acquire advertising inventory, costs to license and produce content, third-party manufacturing costs, as well as operating expenses including payroll-related expenses, consulting and professional service fees, and facility and marketing expenses. Other uses of cash include purchases of property and equipment and mergers and acquisitions.
As our business and workforce continue to expand, we expect to continue to incur expenses for facility and building related costs for our office locations in the United States and internationally. In addition, we expect to continue our investments in purchases of computer systems and other property and equipment. We have pursued merger and acquisition activities, such as the acquisition of the Nielsen AVA business, the This Old House business, and content rights from Quibi, and we may pursue additional merger and acquisition activities in the future, including the acquisition of rights to programming and content assets. These activities can materially impact our liquidity and capital resources.
We believe our existing cash and cash equivalents balance, cash flow from operations, and our undrawn available balance under our Credit Agreement will be sufficient to meet our working capital, capital expenditures, and material cash requirements from known contractual obligations for the next twelve months and beyond. Our future capital requirements, the adequacy of available funds, and cash flows from operations could be affected by various risks and uncertainties, including, but not material.

Silicon Valley Bank Loanlimited to, those detailed in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors in this Annual Report and Security Agreements

In May 2015,the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. While the pandemic has not severely impacted our liquidity and capital resources to date, it has contributed to disruption and volatility in local economies and in capital and credit markets, which could adversely affect our liquidity and capital resources in the future.

We may attempt to raise additional capital through the sale of equity securities or other financing arrangements. If we amendedraise additional funds by issuing equity, the ownership of our Restated 2014 loanexisting stockholders will be diluted. Our Credit Agreement expires in February 2023. If we raise additional financing by the incurrence of additional indebtedness, we may be subject to fixed payment obligations and security agreement (“Restated LSA”)also to restrictive covenants.
At-the-Market Offering
On March 2, 2021, we entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement with Silicon Valley Bank (“Bank’)Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., extending the agreementand Evercore Group L.L.C., as our sales agents, pursuant to June 30, 2017. The amended Restated LSA provides advances under a revolving linewhich we could offer and sell from time-to-time shares of creditour Class A common stock for aggregate gross proceeds of up to $30.0$1,000.0 million. In March 2021, we sold approximately 2.6 million shares of Class A common stock at an average selling price of $379.26 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,000.0 million and incurred issuance costs of $10.4 million.
Senior Secured Term Loan A and Revolving Credit Facilities
On February 19, 2019, we entered into a Credit Agreement with Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. (as amended on May 3, 2019, the “Credit Agreement”), which provides for letters(i) a four-year revolving credit facility in the aggregate principal amount of credit to be issued up to $100.0 million (the “Revolving Credit Facility”), (ii) a four-year delayed draw term loan A facility in the lessoraggregate principal amount of up to $100.0 million (the “Term Loan A Facility”), and (iii) an uncommitted incremental facility subject to certain conditions (together with the available line of credit, reduced by outstanding advancesRevolving Credit Facility and drawn but unreimbursed letters of credit, or $5.0 million. The advances under the first amendment toTerm Loan A Facility, collectively, the Restated LSA carry“Credit Facility”).
57


For our current borrowings, we have elected a floating per annumEurodollar borrowing with interest at a rate equal to the prime rate or the primeadjusted one-month LIBOR rate plus 2.5% dependingan applicable margin of 1.75% based on certain ratiosour secured leverage ratio. The borrowings under the facility mature or have to be repaid in full by February 2023. Our obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of our assets. The Credit Agreement contains customary representations and warranties, customary affirmative and negative covenants, a financial covenant that is tested quarterly and requires us to maintain a currentcertain adjusted quick ratio (calculated as current assets, divided by current liabilities less deferred revenue), greater than or equalof at least 1.00 to 1:1.

In June 2017, we entered into a second amendment to the Restated LSA. The advances under the second amendment carry a floating per annum interest rate equal to, at our option, (1) the prime rate or (2) LIBOR plus 2.75%, or the prime rate plus 1% depending on certain ratios. This amendment further changed the financial covenant to maintain a current ratio (calculated as current assets, divided by current liabilities less deferred revenue) greater than or equal to 1.25. The revolving line1.00, and customary events of credit terminates on June 30, 2019 at which time the principal amount of all outstanding advances becomes due and payable.

default. As of December 31, 2017, no borrowings under the revolving line of credit were outstanding and letters of credit in the amount of $1.5 million were outstanding. As of December 31, 2017,2021, we were in compliance with all of the covenants of the Credit Agreement. See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report for additional details regarding the amended Restated LSA and the rate of interest on the lineCredit Agreement.

We had outstanding letters of credit was 4.31%.

In June 2017, we entered into a subordinated loan agreement (“2017 Agreement”) withof $38.0 million and $30.8 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, against the Bank. The 2017 Agreement provides for a term loan borrowing of $40.0 million with a minimum of $25.0 million to be initially drawn at the close of the agreement and the remaining amount available for a 24 month period, to be drawn in no less than $5.0 million increments. Advances under the term loan incur a facility fee equal to 1% of the drawn borrowings, in addition to interest payments at an interest rate equal to, at our option, (1) the prime rate plus 3.5% or (2) LIBOR plus 6.5%, subject to a 1% LIBOR floor. Additionally, the borrowings incur payment in kind interest fees equal to 2.5%, accruing to the unpaid borrowings balance, compounded monthly. Payment in kind interest may be settled in cash, at our election, during the term or at maturity. We are also obligated to pay final payment fees ranging from 1% to 4% depending on the timing of the payment. The 2017 Agreement terminates on October 9, 2020. On October 31, 2017, we repaid the entire amount outstanding, and subsequently terminated the 2017 Agreement.

In connection with the 2017 Agreement we issued 0.4 million warrants to purchase shares of Series H convertible preferred stock, with an exercise price of $9.17340. The warrants are exercisable up to ten years from the date of issuance. Upon the repayment of the amounts borrowed and the subsequent termination of the 2017 Agreement, we cancelled 0.1 million warrants to purchase Class B common stock that were contingent on future borrowings.

Revolving Credit Facility.

Cash Flows

The following table summarizes our cash flows for the periods presented:

presented (in thousands):

 

Year Ended

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 26,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

(in thousands)

 

20212020

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Data:

Cash flows provided by (used in) operating

activities

 

$

37,292

 

 

$

(32,463

)

 

$

(32,604

)

Cash flows provided by operating activitiesCash flows provided by operating activities$228,081 $148,192 

Cash flows used in investing activities

 

 

(12,268

)

 

 

(8,567

)

 

 

(5,205

)

Cash flows used in investing activities$(176,819)$(81,324)

Cash flows provided by (used in) financing

activities

 

 

117,664

 

 

 

(156

)

 

 

58,547

 

Cash flows provided by financing activitiesCash flows provided by financing activities$1,003,147 $509,048 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

During

Our operating activities provided cash of $228.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, operating activities generated $37.32021. Our net income of $242.4 million in cash as a result of net loss of $63.5 million,for the year ended December 31, 2021 was adjusted by non-cash charges of $60.4$355.7 million and increase of $39.5 million in our net operating assets and liabilities. The non-cash charges comprisecomprised mainly of $40.3 million of change in fair value of preferred stock warrants, $11.0 million of stock-based compensation, $5.3 millionamortization of content assets, depreciation and amortization $2.3 millionon property and equipment and intangible assets, and amortization of loss from extinguishment of debt and $0.5 million of loss relating to exit fromoperating right-of-use assets. The changes in our prior headquarter facilities. The increase in operating assets and liabilities is the resultused cash of $370.0 million mainly from an increase in accounts receivable primarily driven by an increase in revenue, an increase in content assets, an increase in contract assets from revenue recognized from customers, payments made for operating lease liabilities, and a decrease in deferred revenue offset by inflows from an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $48.4 millionand a decrease in inventory balances. These changes are mainly due to both theoverall growth in the business andcombined with the timing of receipts from customers and payments increase in deferred revenue balances of $30.0 million, decrease in inventories of $10.8 million, and increase in other long-term liabilities by $3.6 million. These increases were offset by increases in accounts receivable of $41.2 million as a result of growth in our business, increase in prepaid and other current assets of $6.5 million, increase in other non-current assets of $2.8 million.

Duringto vendors.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Our investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016, operating activities used $32.52021 included cash outflows of $176.8 million in cash as a result of a net loss of $42.8 million, adjusted by non-cash charges of $17.8 million and a decrease of $7.5 million in our net operating assets and liabilities. The non-cash charges of $17.8 million were primarily comprised of $8.2$136.8 million for the acquisition of stock-based compensation expenses, $5.3 million of depreciation and amortization expense and a $3.8 million loss provision related tobusinesses, mainly the exit from our prior headquarter facilities. The decrease from our net operating assets and liabilities was primarily the result of a $13.3 million increase in inventory for anticipated sales of players, a $26.4 million increase in accounts receivable as a result of increases in sales of our players and platform arrangements and a $2.9 million increase in deferred cost of revenue. The decrease in our net operating assets and liabilities was partially offset by a $15.0 million increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities due to the timing of payments and a $19.8 million increase in deferred revenue as a result of the growth in our business.

During the year ended December 26, 2015, operating activities used $32.6 million in cash as a result of a net loss of $40.6 million, adjusted by non-cash charges of $12.4 million and a decrease of $4.4 million in our net operating assets and liabilities. The non-cash charges of $12.4 million were primarily comprised of $5.3 million of stock-based compensation expenses, a $1.8 million fair value re-measurement charge related to preferred stock warrant liability, $2.6 million of depreciation and amortization expense and a $1.6 million write-off of deferred IPO costs. The decrease from our net operating assets and liabilities was primarily the result of a $3.8 million increase in inventory for anticipated sales of players, a $14.1 million increase in accounts receivable as a result of increases in sales of our players and platform arrangements, a $3.0 million increase in deferred cost of revenue and a $1.9 million increase in prepaid assets due to the growth in our business. The decrease in our net operating assets and liabilities was partially offset by a $7.5 million increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities due to the timing of payments, an $8.3 million increase in deferred revenue as a result of the growth in ourNielsen AVA business and a $1.4This Old House, and $40.0 million increase in non-current liabilities primarily due to the deferred rentfor purchases of property and equipment and expenditures on our new headquarter lease.

leasehold improvements.

Cash FlowFlows from InvestingFinancing Activities

During

Our financing activities provided cash of $1,003.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, investing activities used $12.32021. The cash was received mainly from proceeds from an at-the-market offering of $989.6 million, in cash mainly on capital expenditures related to purchase of property, equipment and leasehold improvements of $9.2 million and acquisition of a business of $3.0 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, and December 26, 2015 investing activities used $8.6 million and $5.2 million in cash, respectively, primarily on capital expenditures to purchase property and equipment and leasehold improvements related to expanding our facilities.

Cash Flow from Financing Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2017, financing activities provided $117.7 million in cash primarily from the sale of shares in our IPO net of issuance cost of $131.6 million,costs, and proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options of $1.8 million$18.5 million. These inflows were offset by net repayment$5.0 million of debt of $15.8 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, financing activities used $0.2 million inrepayments made on borrowings.

Material Cash Requirements from Known Contractual Obligations
Our material cash requirements from $0.4 million in proceeds from stock option exercises, less $0.6 million in IPO costs paid during the period.

During the year ended December 26, 2015, financing activities provided $58.5 million in cash, resulting primarily from $45.5 million in proceeds from issuance of Series H convertible preferred stock, $15.0 million in borrowings on the line of credit, offset in part by $2.6 million in principal payments on term debt and $1.1 million in IPO costs paid during the period.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements in during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and December 26, 2015.

Contractual Obligations

Our future minimum payments under our non-cancelableknown contractual obligations were as follows as of December 31, 2017:

2021 consisted of:

 

 

Payments Due by Period

 

 

 

Total

 

 

Less Than

1 Year

 

 

1 – 3

Years

 

 

3 – 5

Years

 

 

More Than

5 Years

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Purchase commitments (1)

 

$

75,176

 

 

$

75,176

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Operating lease obligations (2)

 

 

38,556

 

 

 

11,683

 

 

 

23,554

 

 

 

3,319

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

113,732

 

 

$

86,859

 

 

$

23,554

 

 

$

3,319

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) Represents commitments to purchase finished goods from our contract manufacturer and other inventory related items.

 

(2) Represents future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases.

 

We do not have any internal manufacturing capabilitiesPrincipal payments related to our Term Loan A Facility that are included in our consolidated balance sheets and primarily rely upon onethe related periodic interest payments. For additional information regarding the terms of the debt and interest payable, see Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report.

Commitments to purchase finished goods from our contract manufacturer, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. Ltd., or Foxconn, to manufacture our players. We rely on Foxconn to manufacture, assemble and test our products. Foxconn acquires components and builds products based on demand forecastmanufacturers and other information supplied by us.inventory related items. Consistent with industry practice,practices, we acquire products by issuing purchase orders supported by supplier contracts. If there are unexpected changes to anticipated demand for our products or in the sales mix of our products, some of theenter into firm, non-cancelable, and unconditional purchase commitments with our contract manufacturers to acquire products through a combination of purchase orders, supplier contracts, and open orders based on projected demand information. Our contract manufacturers source components and build our products based on these demand forecasts. Changes to projected demand or in the subsequent sales mix of our products may result in ourus being committed to purchase excess inventory.

inventory to satisfy

58



these commitments. For additional information regarding manufacturing purchase commitments, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report.
Commitments to license content from content publishers under contractual arrangements. For additional information regarding licensed content commitments, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report.
Operating lease liabilities that are included in our consolidated balance sheets and liabilities related to the lease arrangements that have not yet commenced. For additional information regarding our lease liabilities, see Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report.
The contractual commitment amounts in the tablecommitments discussed above are associated with agreements that are enforceable and legally binding. Obligations under contracts that we can cancel without a significant penalty are not included above.
In addition, we have $66.2 million of unrecognized income tax benefits, for which we are unable to reasonably predict the timing of settlement of liabilities. These income tax benefits are not recognized in the table above.

our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2021.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses, and related disclosures. These estimates and assumptions are affected by management’s application of accounting policies, as well as uncertainty in the current economic environment due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our estimates are based on historical experience, current trends and other factors that we believe to be reasonable at the time our consolidated financial statements are prepared. Our actual results could differ from these estimates.

The critical accounting policies requiring estimates, assumptions, and judgments that we believe have the most significant impact on our financial statements are described below.

Revenue Recognition

Overview

We derive revenue primarily from sales of our players

Our contracts with customers often include promises to transfer multiple products and platform services. Revenueservices to a customer. Determining whether products and services are considered distinct performance obligations requires significant judgment.
Judgment is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.

We have multiple-element arrangements. In such arrangements, we combine arrangement deliverables into units of accounting and allocate the total arrangement consideration to the different units of accounting based on a relative selling price hierarchy. To determine the relative selling price of each element, we use vendor-specific objective evidence, or VSOE, if available, third party evidence, or TPE, if VSOE is not available, or best estimated selling price, or BESP, if neither VSOE nor TPE are available. The objective of BESP isrequired to determine the stand-alone selling price at(“SSP”) for each distinct performance obligation. For performance obligations routinely sold separately, the SSP is determined by evaluating such stand-alone sales. For those performance obligations that are not routinely sold separately, we determine SSP using information that may include market conditions and other observable inputs.

To the extent platform services are part of multiple element arrangements, revenue recognition of each performance obligation in the estimated transaction price of a contract is based on the expected value for which a significant reversal of revenue is not expected to occur. The estimate of the variable consideration is based on the assessment of historical, current, and forecasted performance noted and expected from the performance obligation.
For the sale of third-party goods and services, we would transact a sale ifevaluate whether we are the product or service were availableprincipal, and report revenue on a standalone basis. We establish BESP considering multiple factors including, but not limited to, historical prices of products soldgross basis, or an agent, and report revenue on a stand-alone basis, cost and gross margin objectives, competitive pricing practices and customer and market specific considerations. Revenue is recognized for each unitnet basis. In this assessment, we consider if we obtain control of accounting in accordance with our revenue recognition policy, provided that all revenue recognition criteria have been met.

Players

We sell the majority of our players through consumer retail distribution channels, including major brick and mortar and online retailers and through our website. For sales through consumer retail distribution channels, revenue recognition occurs when title and risk of loss havespecified goods or services before they are transferred to the customer, which usually occurs upon shipment toas well as other indicators such as the customers or receipt of the products by the customer depending on shipping terms. We establishedparty primarily responsible for fulfillment, inventory risk, and discretion in establishing price.

Our player revenue includes allowances for expected product returns and these allowances are recorded as a direct reduction to revenue. Return allowancessales incentives in the estimated transaction price. The estimates for returns and sales incentives are based on our historical experience. Certain payments to retailersexperience and distributors such as market development funds, store promotions and price protection are recorded as a reduction of revenue.anticipated performance. We reduce revenue at the later of the date at which the related player revenue is recognized or the date on which the program is offered. On occasion, these allowances cannot be reasonably and reliably estimated. Player revenue is then recognized at the time the players sell through to the end customer.

Our player sales include two units of accounting: hardware, which includes embedded software, andprovide unspecified upgrades or enhancements on a when-and-if-available basis.and updates to our player end users. We have determined that our hardware and the embedded software are considered a single unit of accounting, because the hardware and software individually do not have standalone value and are not sold separately. We initially record the relative selling priceallocated value of the unspecified upgrades or enhancements on a when-and-if-available basisthese as deferred revenue and then recognize the deferred revenue into revenueit ratably on a straight-linetime elapsed basis over the estimated economic life of the associated players.


Shipping charges billed to customers are included in player revenue and the related shipping costs are included in cost of player revenue. Revenue is recorded net

Business Combinations
We recognize, separately from goodwill, identifiable assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination at fair value on the date of taxes collected or accrued. Sales taxes are recorded as current liabilities until remittedacquisition. We use our best estimates and assumptions to accurately assign fair value to the relevant government authority.

Platform

tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date as well as the useful lives of those acquired intangible assets. Examples of critical estimates in valuing certain of the intangible assets and goodwill we have acquired include, but are not limited to, future expected cash inflows and outflows, expected technology life cycle, attrition

59


rates of customers, and discount rates. We earn platform revenue from fees received from advertisers and content publishers and from licensing our technology and proprietary operating system to service operators and TV brands. Platform revenue primarily includes fees earned or derived fromestimate the saleuseful lives of digital advertising, revenue sharing with content publishers for new or recurring user subscriptions activated through our platform and revenue share from user purchases of content publishers’ media through our platform. We also earn revenue from the sale of branded channel buttons on player and TV remote controls. Licensing revenue from service operators are mostly generated from unit activation or flat fees and ongoing maintenance fees. Licensing revenue from TV brands are generated on a flat fee basis or from per unit licensing fees earned.

Digital advertising includes video and display ads that are served on our TV streaming platform. Digital advertising revenue primarily consists of video and display advertising commonly sold on a cost per thousand impression basis. Advertising revenue arrangements are evidenced by a fully executed insertion order. Revenue is recognized in the period the impressions and promotional media are delivered. There is significant judgment in accounting for advertising arrangements related to whether we should report revenueintangible assets based on the gross amountexpected period over which we anticipate generating economic benefit from the asset. Unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that may affect the accuracy or validity of such assumptions, estimates or actual results.

While we charge the advertiser or net of acquisition costs paid to content publishers. To determine if we should report revenue on a gross or net basis, we assess whether we are actinguse our best estimates and assumptions as the principal or agent in the transaction. If we are acting as the principal, we record revenue on a gross basis. If we are acting as the agent, we record revenue on a net basis. We evaluate allpart of the indicators inpurchase price allocation process to accurately value assets and liabilities acquired, these estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. During the guidancemeasurement period, which may be up to make this determination. While no one indicator is determinative, we placeyear from the most weight on the analysis of whether we are the primary obligor. We mostly report advertising revenue on a gross basis predominantly because we are the primary obligor responsible for fulfilling the advertisement delivery and maintaining the relationship with the advertiser, including the acceptability of the services delivered. We also establish pricing with the advertiser and have discretion in supplier selection given we can choose where to place the advertisement on available inventory across our platform.

Fees derived from our revenue share from new or recurring user subscriptions activated on our platform and from purchases of content publishers’ media are recognized as transacted at the net amount retained by us, generally equal to a fixed percentage of the price charged by the content publisher or a contractual flat fee. When the content publisher is responsible for user billing, we recognize revenue from our share of the fees on an as reported basis, in arrears, on a monthly or quarterly basis.

We also earn fees through the sale of branded channel buttons on player and TV remote controls. These branded buttons provide one-touch, direct access to the providers’ content on our platform. We typically receive a fixed fee per button unit, and revenue is recognized as player remote controls are shipped by us or reported as shipped by TV brands.

Revenue earned from service operators and TV brands in the licensing of our technology and proprietary operating system are accounted for under software revenue recognition guidance. We have been unable to establish VSOE for any component of these licensing arrangements and therefore these arrangements are accounted for as a single unit of accounting and all revenue related to the licensing arrangements is recognized over the term of the relationship. Arrangements with service operators are generally comprised of a license for the technology and proprietary operating system, unspecified upgrades or enhancements, hosting of a branded channel store, and engineering and support services. Arrangements with TV brands commonly include a license to the technology and proprietary operating system over a specified term including updates and upgrades.

Valuation of Inventory

We value inventory at the lower of cost or market with cost determined on a first-in, first-out basis. We base write-downs of inventories upon current facts and circumstances. We perform a detailed assessment of excess and obsolete inventory at each balance sheetacquisition date, which includes a review of, among other factors, demand requirements and market conditions. Based on this analysis, we record adjustments whento consideration transferred, and the assets and liabilities acquired, with the corresponding offset to goodwill to the extent we identify adjustments to the preliminary purchase price allocation. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of consideration transferred, and assets and liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to the consolidated statements of operations.

Impairment of Intangible Assets
We identify intangible assets acquired in a business combination and determine their fair value. The determination involves certain judgments and estimates. These judgments include, but are not limited to, the cash flows that an asset is expected to generate in the future and the appropriate discount rate. We amortize purchased-intangible assets on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets. We review purchased-intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the useful life is shorter than we had originally estimated, or that the carrying amount of the asset group to reflect


inventorywhich it relates may not be recoverable. If such facts and circumstances indicate an asset group’s carrying amount may not be recoverable, we assess the recoverability of finished products, materials on hand and purchase commitments at lower of cost or market whichpurchased-intangible assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the asset group against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on net realizable value. We establish a reserve for players or materials which are not forecasted to be consumed. Although we try to ensure the accuracyexcess of our forecasts of player demand and pricing assumptions, any significant unanticipated changes in demand, pricing or technological developments could significantly impact the carrying amount over the fair value of our inventory and our reported operating results.these asset groups. If we find that our supply estimates exceed our inventory demands, our inventory is written-down and charged to cost of revenue at the time of such determination. Conversely, if assumptions or circumstances beyond our control change and we subsequently sell players that have previously been written-down, our gross margin in the period of sale will be favorably impacted. The inventory provisions recorded are netuseful life of the reversalsasset is shorter than originally estimated, we accelerate the rate of provisions for sales of previously written-down inventory for each period presented.

amortization and amortize the remaining carrying value over the new shorter useful life.

Allowances for Sales Returns and Sales Incentives and Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable are stated at invoice value less estimated allowances that include allowance for sales returns customer incentives and doubtful accounts. To determine the allowances for returns, sales incentives and doubtful accounts, weincentives. We perform an ongoing analysis of various factors including our historical experience, recent write-offspromotional programs, claims to date, and specific analysis of significant receivables that are past due.other business factors to determine the allowances for sales returns and sales incentives. If our estimates regarding accounts receivable allowances differ from the actual results, the losses or gains could be material.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period of the respective award. Determining the fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date requires judgment.

We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options. The determination of the grant date fair value of options using an option-pricing model is affected by our estimated common stock fair value as well as assumptions regarding a number of other complex and subjective variables. These variables include our expected stock price volatility over the expected term of the options, stock option exercise and cancellation behaviors, risk-free interest rates and expected dividends, which are estimated as follows:

Fair Value of Our Common Stock. Prior to our IPO, the fair value of the common stock underlying our stock options was determined by our Board of Directors. The valuations of our common stock were determined in accordance with the guidelines outlined in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Practice Aid, Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation. Our Board of Directors, with input from management, exercised significant judgment and considered numerous objective and subjective factors to determine the fair value of our common stock at each grant date, including but not limited to the prices, rights, preferences and privileges of our preferred stock relative to the common stock,  our operating and financial performance, current business conditions and projections, our stage of development, likelihood of achieving a liquidity event for the shares of common stock underlying these stock options, such as an IPO or sale of our company, given prevailing market conditions, any adjustment necessary to recognize a lack of marketability of the common stock underlying the granted options, the market performance of comparable publicly-traded companies, the U.S. and global capital market conditions.

Subsequent to our IPO, we use the market closing price for our Class A common stock as reported on The NASDAQ Global Select Market on the date of grant.

Expected Term. The expected term of employee stock options represents the weighted-average period that the stock options are expected to remain outstanding. To determine the expected term, we generally apply the simplified approach in which the expected term of an award is presumed to be the mid-point between the vesting date and the expiration date of the award as we do not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis for an estimate of expected term.


Volatility. As we do not have sufficient trading history for our Class A common stock, the expected volatility for our Class A common stock is estimated by taking the average historic price volatility for industry peers based on daily price observations over a period equivalent to the expected term of the stock option awards. Industry peers consist of several public companies in our industry which are either similar in size, stage of life cycle or financial leverage. We intend to consistently apply this process until a sufficient amount of historical information regarding the volatility of our own Class A common stock share price becomes available or unless circumstances change such that the identified peer companies are no longer similar to us, in which case, more suitable companies whose share prices are available would be utilized in the calculation.

Risk-free Rate. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yields of U.S. Treasury securities with maturities similar to the expected term for each of our option awards.

Dividend Yield. We have never declared or paid any cash dividends and do not presently plan to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Consequently, we use an expected dividend yield of zero.

In addition to the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model, we also estimated a forfeiture rate to calculate the stock-based compensation expense for our awards prior to January 1, 2017. Beginning January 1, 2017, we recognize forfeitures as they occur.

If any of the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model changes significantly, stock-based compensation for future awards may differ materially compared with the awards granted previously.

For stock options issued to non-employees, including consultants, we record an expense equal to the fair value of the options calculated using the Black-Scholes model over the service performance period. The fair value of options granted to non-employees is remeasured throughout the vesting period, and the resulting value is recognized as an expense over the period in which the services are received.

We account for the fair value of the restricted stock units using the closing market price of our Class A common stock on the date of the grant.

We will continue to use judgement in evaluating assumptions related to our stock-based compensation cost. As we continue to accumulate additional data related to our common stock and our business evolves, we may have refinements to our assumptions and estimates which could impact our future stock-based compensation cost.

Deferred Tax Assets

We account for income taxes using an asset and liability approach. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized through future operations.

We utilize a two-step approach to evaluate tax positions. Recognition, step one, requires evaluation of the tax position to determine if based solely on technical merits it is more likely than not, or MLTN, to be sustained upon examination. The MLTN threshold is met when the likelihood of occurrence is greater than 50%. Measurement, step two, is addressed only if step one is satisfied. In step two, the tax benefit is measured as the largest amount of benefit, determined on a cumulative probability basis, which is MLTN to be realized upon ultimate settlement with tax authorities. If a position does not meet the MLTN threshold for recognition in step one, no benefit is recorded until the first subsequent period in with the MLTN threshold is met, the issue is resolved with the tax authority, or the statute of limitations expires. Positions previously recognized are derecognized when we subsequently determine that the position is no longer MLTN to be sustained.


Provision for Income Taxes

We account for income taxes in accordance with authoritative guidance, which requires the use of the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon the difference between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rate expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the differences are expected to be reversed.

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized. We have established a full valuation allowance to offset domesticU.S. and Netherlands net deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty of realizing future tax benefits from our net operating loss carry-forwards and other deferred tax assets. Our valuation allowance is attributable to the uncertainty of realizing future tax benefits from U.S. and Netherlands net operating losses and other deferred tax assets.

JOBS Act Accounting Election

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in In order to assess the JOBS Act. Underlikelihood that we will recover our deferred tax assets against future sources of taxable income, we review the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards issued subsequent to the enactmentlevel of the JOBS Act until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have irrevocably elected not to avail ourselvespositive and negative evidence of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards, and, therefore, will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.

future taxable income which is a critical estimate.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2017,

The recent accounting pronouncements adopted during the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwillyear ended December 31, 2021 and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which eliminates Stepthose not yet adopted are discussed and included in Note 2 from the goodwill impairment test which measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. Under this guidance, an entity should perform its annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, and should recognize an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, with the loss not exceeding the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The guidance should be applied prospectively. We are evaluating the impact of this new guidance on the consolidated financial statements and the related disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which changes the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities should be accounted for as an acquisition of a business or group of assets. The guidance requires an entity to evaluate if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; if so, the set of transferred assets and activities is not a business. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The guidance should be applied prospectively to any transactions occurring on or after the adoption date. We are evaluating the impactItem 8 of this new guidance on the consolidated financial statements and the related disclosures.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16 Income Taxes, (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, which simplifies certain aspects of the income tax accounting for Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets. Under current GAAP, the tax effects of intra-entity asset transfers (intercompany sales)Annual Report. They are deferred until the transferred asset is sold to a third party or otherwise recovered through use. This is an exception to the principle in ASC 740, Income Taxes, that generally requires comprehensive recognition of current and deferred income taxes. The new guidance allows a reporting entity to recognize the tax expense from the sale of the asset in the seller’s tax jurisdiction when the transfer occurs, even though the pre-tax effects of that transaction are eliminated in consolidation. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. We are currently in the process of evaluating the effect of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements and the related disclosures.


In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force), which addresses classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments related to the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We are evaluating the impact of this new guidance on the consolidated financial statements and the related disclosures.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), related to new accounting and reporting guidelines for leasing arrangements. The guidance requires organizations that lease assets to recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet related to the rights and obligations createdincorporated herein by those leases, regardless of whether they are classified as finance or operating leases. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The new standard is to be applied using a modified retrospective approach. We are evaluating the impact of this new guidance on the consolidated financial statements and the related disclosures.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, related to the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. We are evaluating the impact of this new guidance on the consolidated financial statements and the related disclosures.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), related to the recognition and reporting of revenue that establishes a comprehensive new revenue recognition model designed to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer in an amount that reflects the consideration the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. In 2016 the FASB issued amendments on this guidance with the same effective date and transition guidance. We plan to adopt the new revenue standard in the first quarter of 2018 using the modified retrospective approach, which requires the cumulative impact of initially applying the guidance to be recognized as an adjustment to our accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2018, the date of adoption. Prior periods will not be retroactively adjusted.

We are currently in the process of finalizing the impact of the new standard on our accounting policies, processes and system requirements. Furthermore, we have made and will continue to make investments in systems to enable timely and accurate reporting under the new standard. We expect that the adjustment from the adoption will result in a decrease to the accumulated deficit in the range of $32.0 million to $42.0 million.

We believe that the new standard will impact accounting for revenue arrangements as follows:

Revenue from the licensing of our technology and proprietary operating system to service operators and TV brands, will be recognized earlier and could result in greater variability in revenue recognition;

reference.

Revenue resulting from the variable consideration (e.g. revenue share from user subscriptions and media purchases through the platform or sale of branded channel buttons on its remote controls) outlined in content publisher arrangements is estimated and allocated for the entire contract period and then recognized based on the percentage of completion across various performance obligations; and

Expanded disclosures.

We expect revenue recognition related to players and advertising to remain relatively unchanged under the new guidance.


Item 7A. Quantitative and QualitativeQualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Fluctuation Risk

Our exposure to interest rate risk primarily relates to the interest income generated by cash, held at Silicon Valley Bank, which is relatively insensitive tocash equivalents, and interest rate changes.expense on the Credit Facility. The primary objective of our investment activitiespolicy is to preserve principal while maximizing
60


income without significantly increasing risk. We do not believe that an increase or decrease in interest rates of 100 basis points would have a material effect on our operating results or financial condition.

Our As of December 31, 2021, borrowings under the Term Loan A Facility totaled $90.0 million with an effective interest rate of 2.0%. If the amount outstanding under our credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank areTerm Loan A Facility remains at variable interest rates. However, a hypothetical 100-basis point change inthis level for an entire year and interest rates increased or decreased by 100 basis points, our annual interest expense would not have a material impact on our borrowingsincrease or results of operations.

decrease, respectively, by an additional $0.9 million.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Most of our sales are currentlyrevenue is generated within the United States and we have minimal foreign currency risk related to our revenue. In addition, most of our operating expenses are denominated in the U.S. dollar, resulting in minimal foreign currency risks. In the future, if our international sales increaserevenue increases or more of our expenses are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, our exposure to foreign currency risk will likely be more significant. For any of the periods presented, we did not enter into any foreign exchange contracts. However, in the future, we may enter into derivatives or other financial instruments in an attempt to hedge our foreign currency exchange risk.

61


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Page

Page

67

68

69

70

71

72


62



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Roku, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Roku, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, convertible preferred stock andcomprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity, (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”"financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2021, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 18, 2022, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion


These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB)PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Revenue Recognition - Variable Consideration Determination of Content Distribution Services and Branded Channel Buttons – Refer to Note 2 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

As part of the Company’s revenue recognition for its arrangements with content publishers, management is required to estimate variable consideration from transactional revenue sharing related to content distribution services and the sale of branded channel buttons on remote controls.

Variable consideration related to content distribution services and sale of branded channel buttons on remote controls (“content publisher arrangements”) is included in the estimated transaction price based on the expected value for which a significant reversal of revenue is not expected to occur. For content distribution services, the estimate of the variable consideration is based on management’s assessment of historical, current, and forecasted performance of the publisher’s content applications. For the sale of branded channel buttons on remote controls, the estimate of the variable consideration is based on management’s assessment of historical, current, and forecasted player sales volumes.
63



We identified the revenue forecasts relating to content publisher arrangements as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgment necessary to estimate variable consideration and transaction prices. Such estimates required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort relative to evaluating the reasonableness of management’s estimates and assumptions related to the forecasts of variable consideration.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to management’s forecast used in the determination of future variable consideration included the following, among others:

We tested the effectiveness of controls over management’s forecasting process related to content distribution services and sale of branded channel buttons on remote controls.
We selected a sample of revenue arrangements with variable consideration and performed the following:
Obtained contractual documents for each selection, including master agreements and other related documents.
Analyzed the contractual documents to determine if all arrangement terms that may have an impact on revenue recognition were identified and properly considered in the evaluation of the accounting for the contract, including terms and conditions for transactional revenue sharing.
Performed inquiries with applicable individuals in the Company’s finance, operations, and sales departments regarding the estimates for content distribution services and sales of branded channel buttons on remote controls.
Tested management’s accuracy of forecasting by comparing the historical forecasts of consideration to actual consideration received.
Evaluated changes from prior period forecasts to current period forecasts, when applicable.
Tested the mathematical accuracy of the compilation of the forecasts.
We considered the existence of contradictory evidence based on reading of internal communication to management, Company press releases, industry reports, publicly available information related to publishers’ content applications as well as our observations and inquires as to the changes within the business.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Jose, California

March 1, 2018  

February 18, 2022
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2008.


64


ROKU, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except par value)

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

$

177,250

 

 

$

34,562

 

Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $17,739 and $16,213 as of

   December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively

 

 

120,553

 

 

 

79,473

 

Inventories

 

 

32,740

 

 

 

43,568

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

11,367

 

 

 

4,981

 

Deferred cost of revenue

 

 

3,007

 

 

 

2,636

 

Total current assets

 

 

344,917

 

 

 

165,220

 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

14,736

 

 

 

9,528

 

Deferred cost of revenue, non-current portion

 

 

5,403

 

 

 

3,815

 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

2,030

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

 

1,382

 

 

 

 

Other non-current assets

 

 

3,429

 

 

 

515

 

Total Assets

 

$

371,897

 

 

$

179,078

 

Liabilities, Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

56,413

 

 

$

31,397

 

Accrued liabilities

 

 

72,344

 

 

 

46,156

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

 

 

 

 

15,000

 

Deferred revenue, current portion

 

 

34,501

 

 

 

23,952

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

163,258

 

 

 

116,505

 

Preferred stock warrant liability

 

 

 

 

 

9,990

 

Deferred revenue, non-current portion

 

 

48,511

 

 

 

29,084

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

7,849

 

 

 

4,143

 

Total Liabilities

 

 

219,618

 

 

 

159,722

 

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 8)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Convertible Preferred Stock:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Convertible preferred stock, $0.0001 par value

 

 

 

 

 

213,180

 

0 and 84,368 shares authorized as of December 31,

   2017 and 2016, respectively

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0 and 80,844 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31,

   2017 and 2016, respectively

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value;

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,000 and 0 shares authorized as of December 31,

   2017 and 2016, respectively

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

no shares issued and outstanding as of December 31,

   2017 and 2016, respectively

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.0001 par value

 

 

10

 

 

 

3

 

1,150,000 (Class A - 1,000,000 and Class B - 150,000) shares and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

122,000 shares authorized as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

99,157 (Class A - 19,325 and Class B - 79,832) shares and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,819 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016,

   respectively

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

435,607

 

 

 

26,002

 

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(283,338

)

 

 

(219,829

)

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)

 

 

152,279

 

 

 

(193,824

)

Total Liabilities, Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

 

$

371,897

 

 

$

179,078

 

 As of December 31,
 2021 2020
Assets 
Current Assets: 
Cash and cash equivalents$2,146,043 $1,092,815 
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $56,827 and $41,236 as of752,393 523,852 
December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively
Inventories50,276 53,895 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets105,795 27,078 
Total current assets3,054,507 1,697,640 
Property and equipment, net177,567 155,197 
Operating lease right-of-use assets345,660 266,197 
Intangible assets, net84,126 62,181 
Goodwill161,519 73,058 
Other non-current assets258,766 16,269 
Total Assets$4,082,145 $2,270,542 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable$124,921 $112,314 
Accrued liabilities549,055 347,668 
Current portion of long-term debt9,883 4,874 
Deferred revenue, current portion45,760 55,465 
Total current liabilities729,619 520,321 
Long-term debt, non-current portion79,985 89,868 
Deferred revenue, non-current portion28,726 21,283 
Operating lease liability, non-current portion394,724 307,936 
Other long-term liabilities82,485 3,119 
Total Liabilities1,315,539 942,527 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)00
Stockholders’ Equity:
Common stock, $0.0001 par value;14 13 
1,150,000 (Class A - 1,000,000 and Class B - 150,000) shares authorized
as of December 31, 2021 and 2020;
135,137 (Class A - 118,767 and Class B - 16,370) shares and
128,004 (Class A - 110,645 and Class B - 17,359) shares
issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively
Additional paid-in capital2,856,572 1,660,379 
Accumulated other comprehensive income41 29 
Accumulated deficit(90,021)(332,406)
Total stockholders’ equity2,766,606 1,328,015 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity$4,082,145 $2,270,542 
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



65


ROKU, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

December 26,

2015

 

Net Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Player

 

$

287,407

 

 

$

293,929

 

 

$

269,977

 

Platform

 

 

225,356

 

 

 

104,720

 

 

 

49,880

 

Total net revenue

 

 

512,763

 

 

 

398,649

 

 

 

319,857

 

Cost of Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Player

 

 

258,104

 

 

 

249,821

 

 

 

221,416

 

Platform

 

 

54,826

 

 

 

27,783

 

 

 

8,663

 

Total cost of revenue

 

 

312,930

 

 

 

277,604

 

 

 

230,079

 

Gross Profit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Player

 

 

29,303

 

 

 

44,108

 

 

 

48,561

 

Platform

 

 

170,530

 

 

 

76,937

 

 

 

41,217

 

Total gross profit

 

 

199,833

 

 

 

121,045

 

 

 

89,778

 

Operating Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development

 

 

107,945

 

 

 

76,177

 

 

 

50,469

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

64,069

 

 

 

52,888

 

 

 

45,153

 

General and administrative

 

 

47,435

 

 

 

35,341

 

 

 

31,708

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

219,449

 

 

 

164,406

 

 

 

127,330

 

Loss from Operations

 

 

(19,616

)

 

 

(43,361

)

 

 

(37,552

)

Other Income (Expense), Net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

 

(1,612

)

 

 

146

 

 

 

(696

)

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

(2,338

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of preferred stock warrant liability

 

 

(40,333

)

 

 

888

 

 

 

(1,768

)

Other income (expense), net

 

 

705

 

 

 

(220

)

 

 

(448

)

Total other income (expense), net

 

 

(43,578

)

 

 

814

 

 

 

(2,912

)

Loss Before Income Taxes

 

 

(63,194

)

 

 

(42,547

)

 

 

(40,464

)

Income tax expense

 

 

315

 

 

 

211

 

 

 

147

 

Net Loss Attributable to Common Stockholders

 

$

(63,509

)

 

$

(42,758

)

 

$

(40,611

)

Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders—basic

   and diluted

 

$

(2.24

)

 

$

(9.01

)

 

$

(10.08

)

Weighted-average shares used in computing net loss

   per share attributable to common stockholders—basic

   and diluted

 

 

28,308

 

 

 

4,746

 

 

 

4,030

 

Years Ended December 31,
202120202019
Net Revenue:
Platform$2,284,925 $1,267,744 $740,776 
Player479,659 510,644 388,145 
Total net revenue2,764,584 1,778,388 1,128,921 
Cost of Revenue:
Platform823,924 503,177 262,655 
Player532,060 466,992 371,042 
Total cost of revenue1,355,984 970,169 633,697 
Gross Profit (Loss):
Platform1,461,001 764,567 478,121 
Player(52,401)43,652 17,103 
Total gross profit1,408,600 808,219 495,224 
Operating Expenses:
Research and development461,602 355,784 265,011 
Sales and marketing455,601 299,457 178,855 
General and administrative256,297 173,231 116,417 
Total operating expenses1,173,500 828,472 560,283 
Income (Loss) from Operations235,100 (20,253)(65,059)
Other Income (Expense), Net:
Interest expense(2,980)(3,432)(2,366)
Other income (expense), net4,467 5,233 6,506 
Total other income (expense), net1,487 1,801 4,140 
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes236,587 (18,452)(60,919)
Income tax benefit(5,798)(945)(982)
Net Income (Loss)$242,385 $(17,507)$(59,937)
Net income (loss) per share — basic$1.83 $(0.14)$(0.52)
Net income (loss) per share — diluted$1.71 $(0.14)$(0.52)
Weighted-average common shares outstanding — basic132,710123,978115,218
Weighted-average common shares outstanding — diluted141,668123,978115,218
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


66


ROKU, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK ANDCOMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands)
 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Net Income (Loss)$242,385 $(17,507)$(59,937)
Other comprehensive gain, net of tax:
Unrealized gain on short-term investments, net of tax— — 17 
Foreign currency translation adjustment12 — 29 
Other comprehensive gain, net of tax12 — 46 
Comprehensive Net Income (Loss)$242,397 $(17,507)$(59,891)
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

67


ROKU, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

(in thousands, except per share data)

(in thousands)

 

 

Convertible

Preferred Stock

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

Additional

Paid-in

 

 

Treasury

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Total

Stockholders’

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Capital

 

 

Stock

 

 

Deficit

 

 

Equity (Deficit)

 

Balance—December 27, 2014

 

 

75,475

 

 

$

165,099

 

 

 

3,747

 

 

$

 

 

$

11,205

 

 

$

 

 

$

(136,460

)

 

$

(125,255

)

Issuance of Series D convertible preferred stock

   upon  exercise of preferred stock warrants

 

 

409

 

 

 

972

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of Series H convertible preferred stock in

   November at $9.17340 per share—net of issuance

   cost of $0.07 million

 

 

4,960

 

 

 

45,432

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reclassification of convertible preferred stock

   warrant liability to equity upon exercise of warrants

 

 

 

 

 

1,677

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock upon exercise

   of stock options, net of repurchases

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

784

 

 

 

 

 

 

837

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

837

 

Vesting of early exercised stock options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,284

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,284

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(40,611

)

 

 

(40,611

)

Balance—December 26, 2015

 

 

80,844

 

 

 

213,180

 

 

 

4,531

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,335

 

 

 

 

 

 

(177,071

)

 

 

(159,736

)

Issuance of common stock upon

   exercise of warrants

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

162

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock upon exercise

   of stock options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

126

 

 

 

 

 

 

438

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

438

 

Vesting of early exercised stock options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,206

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,206

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

��

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(42,758

)

 

 

(42,758

)

Balance—December 31, 2016

 

 

80,844

 

 

 

213,180

 

 

 

4,819

 

 

 

 

 

 

26,005

 

 

 

 

 

 

(219,829

)

 

 

(193,824

)

Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

963

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

2,086

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,087

 

Share repurchases

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(92

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(671

)

 

 

 

 

 

(671

)

Vesting of early exercised stock options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

62

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,953

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,953

 

Issuance of common stock pursuant

   to an acquisition

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

108

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock upon

   exercise of common and preferred warrants

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,165

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock pursuant to an initial

   public offering, net of issuance

   costs of $3.1 million

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,350

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

131,645

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

131,646

 

Conversion of preferred stock into common

   stock pursuant to an initial public offering

 

 

(80,844

)

 

 

(213,180

)

 

 

80,844

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

213,172

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

213,180

 

Reclassification of preferred stock warrants

   liability to additional paid-in-capital upon

   conversion to common stock warrants

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

52,355

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

52,355

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(63,509

)

 

 

(63,509

)

Balance—December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

99,157

 

 

$

10

 

 

$

436,278

 

 

$

(671

)

 

$

(283,338

)

 

$

152,279

 


Common StockAdditional Paid-in CapitalAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)Accumulated DeficitTotal Stockholders' Equity
SharesAmount
Balance-December 31, 2018109,770$11 $498,553 $(17)$(253,896)$244,651 
Vesting of early exercised stock options8686
Share repurchases(2)
Issuance of common stock pursuant to equity incentive plans6,169128,18128,182
Issuance of common stock in connection with at-the-market offerings, net of issuance costs of $6,4003,389330,539330,539
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisition57169,68469,684
Stock-based compensation expense85,17585,175
Unrealized gain on short-term investments1717
Foreign currency translation adjustment2929
Net loss(59,937)(59,937)
Balance-December 31, 2019119,897121,012,21829(313,833)698,426
Vesting of early exercised stock options3838
Issuance of common stock pursuant to equity incentive plans4,107116,80516,806
Issuance of common stock in connection with at-the-market offering, net of issuance costs of $6,8004,000497,242497,242
Stock-based compensation expense134,076134,076
Adoption of ASU 2016-13(1,066)(1,066)
Net loss(17,507)(17,507)
Balance-December 31, 2020128,004131,660,37929(332,406)1,328,015
Vesting of early exercised stock options44
Issuance of common stock pursuant to equity incentive plans4,496118,53118,532
Issuance of common stock in connection with at-the-market offering, net of issuance costs of $10,4002,637989,615989,615
Stock-based compensation expense188,043188,043
Foreign currency translation adjustment1212
Net income242,385242,385
Balance-December 31, 2021135,137$14 $2,856,572 $41 $(90,021)$2,766,606 
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



68


ROKU, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

December 26,

2015

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(63,509

)

 

$

(42,758

)

 

$

(40,611

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating

   activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

5,336

 

 

 

5,302

 

 

 

2,555

 

Impairment of assets

 

 

 

 

 

320

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

10,953

 

 

 

8,206

 

 

 

5,284

 

Provision for doubtful accounts

 

 

104

 

 

 

336

 

 

 

663

 

Change in fair value of preferred stock warrant liability

 

 

40,333

 

 

 

(888

)

 

 

1,768

 

Noncash interest expense

 

 

784

 

 

 

115

 

 

 

354

 

Loss on disposals of property and equipment

 

 

54

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

137

 

Loss from exit of facilities

 

 

525

 

 

 

3,804

 

 

 

 

Loss from extinguishment of debt

 

 

2,338

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Write-off of deferred initial public offering costs

 

 

 

 

 

594

 

 

 

1,609

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

(41,184

)

 

 

(26,354

)

 

 

(14,118

)

Inventories

 

 

10,828

 

 

 

(13,256

)

 

 

(3,754

)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

(6,514

)

 

 

(544

)

 

 

(1,887

)

Deferred cost of revenue

 

 

(1,959

)

 

 

(2,885

)

 

 

(3,017

)

Other noncurrent assets

 

 

(2,794

)

 

 

448

 

 

 

1,179

 

Accounts payable

 

 

24,315

 

 

 

(2,808

)

 

 

4,724

 

Accrued liabilities

 

 

24,127

 

 

 

17,796

 

 

 

2,802

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

3,579

 

 

 

294

 

 

 

1,391

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

29,976

 

 

 

19,786

 

 

 

8,317

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

 

37,292

 

 

 

(32,463

)

 

 

(32,604

)

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase of property and equipment

 

 

(9,229

)

 

 

(8,596

)

 

 

(5,019

)

Purchase of business, net of cash acquired

 

 

(2,959

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in deposits

 

 

(80

)

 

 

29

 

 

 

(186

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(12,268

)

 

 

(8,567

)

 

 

(5,205

)

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payments of costs related to initial public offering

 

 

 

 

 

(594

)

 

 

(1,120

)

Proceeds from borrowings

 

 

24,691

 

 

 

15,000

 

 

 

15,000

 

Repayments of borrowings

 

 

(40,446

)

 

 

(15,000

)

 

 

(2,576

)

Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net of repurchases

 

 

1,773

 

 

 

438

 

 

 

839

 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock pursuant to an initial public

   offering, net of issuance costs of $3.1 million

 

 

131,646

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from exercise of preferred stock warrants

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

972

 

Proceeds from issuance of convertible preferred stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

45,500

 

Issuance costs in connection with issuance of convertible preferred

   stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(68

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 

117,664

 

 

 

(156

)

 

 

58,547

 

Net Increase (Decrease) In Cash

 

 

142,688

 

 

 

(41,186

)

 

 

20,738

 

Cash—Beginning of period

 

 

34,562

 

 

 

75,748

 

 

 

55,010

 

Cash—End of period

 

$

177,250

 

 

$

34,562

 

 

$

75,748

 

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest

 

$

1,149

 

 

$

236

 

 

$

273

 

Cash paid for income taxes

 

$

222

 

 

$

121

 

 

$

83

 

Supplemental disclosures of noncash investing and financing

   activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property and equipment recorded in accounts

   payable and accrued liabilities

 

$

1,250

 

 

$

306

 

 

$

1,608

 

Fair value of preferred stock warrants reclassified to additional paid in capital

 

$

52,355

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,677

 

Issuance of convertible preferred stock warrants in connection

   with debt

 

$

2,032

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)$242,385 $(17,507)$(59,937)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization42,62136,20615,669
Stock-based compensation expense187,532134,07685,175
Amortization of right-of-use assets31,02428,74322,328
Amortization of content assets95,57022,3922,914
Provision for (recoveries of) doubtful accounts(904)3,801704
Other items, net(101)5241,101
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable(221,768)(196,046)(110,225)
Inventories3,619(4,181)(14,129)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets(67,240)(3,450)(9,934)
Deferred cost of revenue1,143
Other non-current assets(102,957)(1,128)(3,060)
Accounts payable8,4286,4109,409
Accrued liabilities38,279103,21874,512
Operating lease liabilities(20,083)12,99911,658
Other long-term liabilities(1,100)618(3,024)
Deferred revenue(7,224)21,517(10,597)
Net cash provided by operating activities228,081148,19213,707
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment(40,041)(82,382)(77,180)
Purchase of business, net of cash acquired(136,778)(68,132)
Proceeds from escrows associated with acquisition1,058
Purchase of intangible assets(7,428)
Purchases of short-term investments(12,365)
Sales/maturities of short-term investments54,810
Net cash used in investing activities(176,819)(81,324)(110,295)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from borrowings, net of issuance costs69,32599,608
Repayments of borrowings(5,000)(74,325)
Proceeds from equity issued under incentive plans18,53216,80628,181
Proceeds from equity issued under at-the-market offerings, net of offering costs989,615497,242330,539
Net cash provided by financing activities1,003,147509,048458,328
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash1,054,409575,916361,740
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash1229
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash —Beginning of period1,093,249517,333155,564
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash —End of period$2,147,670 $1,093,249 $517,333 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period:
Cash and cash equivalents2,146,0431,092,815515,479
Restricted cash, current4341,854
Restricted cash, non-current1,627
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash —End of period$2,147,670 $1,093,249 $517,333 

69


 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest$2,578 $3,470 $3,095 
Cash paid for income taxes$1,363 $1,014 $759 
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Non-cash consideration for business combination$21,400 $— $— 
Services to be received as part of a business combination$6,500 $— $— 
Issuance of common stock for business combinations$— $— $69,684 
Unpaid portion of property and equipment purchases$3,073 $1,242 $10,762 
Unpaid portion of acquisition related expenses$— $— $2,190 
Unpaid portion of purchased intangibles$— $— $400 
Unpaid portion of at-the-market offering costs$— $— $144 
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


70



ROKU, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. THE COMPANY

Organization and Description of Business

Roku, Inc. (the “Company” or “Roku”), was formed in October 2002 as Roku LLC under the laws of the State of Delaware. On February 1, 2008, Roku LLC was converted into Roku, Inc., a Delaware corporation. The Company’s TV streaming platform allows users to easily discover and access a wide variety of movies and TV episodes, as well as live sports, music, news and more. The Company operates in two2 reportable segments and generates platform revenue throughfrom the sale of digital advertising and related services including the OneView ad platform, content distribution services (such as subscription and transaction revenue shares, media and entertainment promotional spending, the sale of Premium Subscriptions, and the sale of branded channel buttons on remote controls), and licensing arrangements with service operators and TV brands and player revenue from the sale of streaming players advertising, subscription and transaction revenue sharing, as well as through licensing arrangements with TV brands and cable, satellite, and telecommunication service operators (“service operators”).

Initial Public Offering

On October 2, 2017, the Company completed its initial public offering (“IPO”) of Class A common stock, in which it sold 10.4 million shares, including 1.4 million shares pursuant to the underwriters’ over-allotment option. The shares were sold at an IPO price of $14.00 per share for net proceeds of $134.8 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of $10.1 million. Additionally, offering costs incurred by the Company were $3.1 million. Upon the closing of the Company’s IPO, all outstanding shares of its convertible preferred stock automatically converted into 80.8 million shares of Class B common stock and all outstanding convertible preferred stock warrants automatically converted to Class B common stock warrants on a one-for-one basis. Following the IPO, we have two classes of authorized common stock – Class A common stock and Class B common stock. Class A common stock entitles holders to one vote per share, and Class B common stock entitles holders to 10 votes per share.

audio products.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements, which include the accounts of Roku, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Fiscal

Reclassification of Prior Year

Prior Presentation

Certain prior period amounts in the consolidated balance sheets and notes to 2017, the Company’s fiscal year was the 52- or 53-weekconsolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to current period that ended on the last Saturday of December. The fiscal years 2015 and 2016 ended on December 26, 2015 and December 31, 2016, respectively. In 2017, the Company changed the fiscal year-end to match the calendar year-end. Fiscal year 2015 spanned 52 weeks and fiscal year 2016 spanned 53 weeks.

presentation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, and liabilities, and related disclosures at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts ofnet revenue, and expenses during the periods presented.expenses. Significant items subject to such estimates includeand assumptions include:
revenue recognition: determining the nature and timing of satisfaction of performance obligations, variable consideration, determining the stand-alone selling prices of performance obligations, gross versus net revenue recognition, and evaluation of customer versus vendor relationships;
the impairment of intangible assets;
valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with business combinations;
useful lives of tangible and intangible assets;
allowances for multiple element arrangements, determination of revenue reporting as net versus gross, sales return reserves, customer incentive programs, inventory valuation, returns and sales incentives; and
the valuation of deferred income tax assets, the recognition and disclosure of contingent liabilities, stock-based compensation and the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations. assets.
The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from the Company’s estimates.

estimates and assumptions.

Comprehensive Loss

Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2021 includes foreign currency translation adjustments. Comprehensive loss is equal to the net loss for all periods presented.  Therefore, the consolidated statements of comprehensiveyear ended December 31, 2020. Comprehensive loss have been omitted fromfor the consolidated financial statements.

year ended December 31, 2019 includes unrealized gains on the Company’s short-term investments and foreign currency translation adjustments. Income taxes on the unrealized gains are not material.

Foreign Currency

The Company uses the U.S. dollar as the functional currency for most of the Company’sits foreign subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar.subsidiaries. Monetary assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are remeasured into U.S. dollars from the local currency at rates in effect at period-end and nonmonetarynon-monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured at historical rates. RevenuesRevenue and expenses are remeasured at average exchange rates in effect during each period. Foreign currency gains or losses from re-measurement and transaction gains or losses are recorded as otherOther income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations. DuringThe Company recorded a foreign currency loss of $1.2 million, gain of $1.3 million, and loss of $0.2 million during the years ended December 31, 20172021, 2020, and 2016,2019, respectively.
71


For those foreign subsidiaries where the local currency is designated as the functional currency, the Company recorded foreign currency gainrecords translation of $0.1 milliontheir assets and foreign currency lossliabilities into U.S. dollars at the balance sheet dates as translation adjustments and includes them as a component of $0.4 million, respectively.

Concentrations

Financial instruments, which potentially subjectAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less at the Companydate of purchase to concentrations of credit risk, consist principallybe cash equivalents. NaN financial institutions managed 30% and 27% of cash and accounts receivable. Ascash equivalents as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016, 95%46% and 94%26% as of the Company’s cash balances were managed by one financial institution. December 31, 2020.
Accounts Receivable, net
Accounts receivable are typically unsecured and are derived from revenue earned from customers. They are stated at invoice value less estimated allowances for sales returns, customersales incentives, doubtful accounts, and doubtful accounts.other miscellaneous allowances. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and maintainsto determine allowances for potential credit losses.

Customers accountinglosses and doubtful accounts. The Company considers historical experience, ongoing promotional activities, historical claim rates, and other factors to determine the allowances for 10% or moresales returns and sales incentives.

Allowance for Sales Returns: Allowance for sales returns consist of the Company’s net revenue were as follows

following activities (in thousands):

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

December 26,

2015

 

Customer A

 

* %

 

 

 

13

%

 

 

16

%

Customer B

 

 

10

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

15

 

Customer C

 

 

20

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

23

 

Customer E

 

10

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Beginning balance$5,912 $6,550 $7,335 
Add: Charged to revenue16,181 14,594 15,541 
Less: Utilization of sales return reserve(16,078)(15,232)(16,326)
Ending balance$6,015 $5,912 $6,550 

Customers accounting

Allowance for 10% or moreSales Incentives: Allowance for sales incentives consisted of the Company’sfollowing activities (in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Beginning balance$30,838 $19,476 $13,750 
Add: Charged to revenue90,530 68,315 65,676 
Less: Utilization of sales incentive reserve(72,957)(56,953)(59,950)
Ending balance$48,411 $30,838 $19,476 
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: Allowance for doubtful accounts consisted of the following activities (in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Beginning balance$4,181 $1,140 $686 
Impact of adoption of ASU 2016-13— 1,066 — 
Adjusted beginning balance$4,181 $2,206 $686 
Provision for (recoveries of) doubtful accounts(904)3,801 704 
Adjustments for recovery and write-off(1,119)(1,826)(250)
Ending balance$2,158 $4,181 $1,140 
The Company did not have any customer that accounted for more than 10% of its accounts receivable, werenet balance as follows:

of December 31, 2021. Customer H accounted for 11% of the accounts receivable, net balance as of December 31, 2020.

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

Customer A

 

* %

 

 

 

12

%

Customer B

 

*

 

 

 

11

 

Customer C

 

*

 

 

 

17

 

Customer D

 

 

16

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*   Less than 10%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

72




Business Combinations

We determine

The Company determines whether a transaction meets the definition of a business combination before applying the acquisition method of accounting to that transaction. The Company allocates the fair value of the purchase consideration of its acquisitions to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their estimated fair values. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair values of identifiable assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill. The operating results of acquired businesses are included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations from their effective acquisition date. Acquisition-related expenses and certain acquisition restructuring and other related charges are recognized separately from the business combination and are expensed as incurred. Contingent consideration classified as a liability is recognized at fair value as of the acquisition date with subsequent fair value adjustments recorded in the consolidated statements of acquisition. Goodwill is measuredoperations.
While the Company uses its best estimates and assumptions to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date, as the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Significant estimates and assumptions are made by management to value such assets and liabilities. Although the Company believes that those estimates and assumptions are reasonable and appropriate, they are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. Additional information related to the acquisition date fair value of acquired assets and assumed liabilities obtainedAs a result, during the measurement period, notwhich may be up to exceed one year from the acquisition date, the Company may result in changesrecord adjustments to consideration transferred, and the recorded values of such assets acquired and liabilities resulting in an offsetting adjustment to any goodwill associatedassumed with the business acquired. Uncertaincorresponding offset to goodwill. In addition, uncertain tax positions and tax-related valuation allowances are initially establishedrecorded in connection with a business combination as of the acquisition date. The Company will continuecontinues to collect information and reevaluatereevaluates these estimates and assumptions throughoutand records any adjustments to the Company’s preliminary estimates with a corresponding offset to goodwill during the measurement period.

Any contingent Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of consideration payable is recognizedtransferred, and assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to the consolidated statements of operations.

Intangible Assets
Intangible assets acquired through business combinations are recorded at their fair value atvalues as of the acquisition date. Liability-classified contingent consideration is remeasured each reporting period withIntangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. The Company evaluates the estimated remaining useful lives of its intangible assets annually and when events or changes in circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining periods of amortization.
Impairment Assessments
The Company evaluates goodwill for possible impairment at least annually during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year or more often, if and when circumstances indicate that goodwill may be impaired. This includes but is not limited to significant adverse changes in the business climate, market conditions, or other events that indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value recognized in earnings untilof a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. In performing its annual assessment, the contingent consideration is settled. When we issue paymentsCompany can opt to perform a qualitative assessment to test a reporting unit’s goodwill for impairment or grants of equity to selling shareholders in connection with an acquisition, we evaluate whether the payments or awards are compensatory. This evaluation includes whether cash payments or stock award vesting is contingentit can directly perform a quantitative assessment. Based on the continued employmentCompany’s qualitative assessment, if it is determined that the fair value of the selling stockholder beyondreporting unit is, more likely than not, less than its carrying amount, then the acquisition date.quantitative assessment is performed. Any excess of the reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value is recorded as an impairment loss, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit.
The Company reviews long-lived assets and intangible assets with finite lives for impairment when events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset or asset group may not be fully recoverable or that the useful lives of the asset or asset group are no longer appropriate. The Company assesses these asset or asset groups for impairment based on their estimated undiscounted future cash flows. If continued employment is required for the carrying value of the asset or asset group exceeds the estimated future undiscounted cash to be paid or stock awards to vest,flows, the award is treated as compensation for post-acquisition services and is recognized as compensation expense.

Acquisition related costs incurred in connection with a business combination, other than those associated with the issuance of debt or equity securities, are expensed as incurred.

Goodwill, Purchased Intangible Assets and Impairment Assessment

Goodwill representsCompany recognizes an impairment loss based on the excess of the purchase pricecarrying amount over the fair value of the asset group.

The Company did not recognize any impairment for goodwill or intangible assets acquiredin any periods reported. The impairments of operating right-of-use assets during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and liabilities assumed, if any, in2019 were not material.
Content Assets
The Company records content assets as Other non-current assets. The amortization expense for licensed content is recorded based on the pattern of monetization of such content which is primarily straight-line. The amortization of produced content is recorded over the applicable content life cycle based upon the ratio of current period revenue to the estimated total revenue to be earned.
Licensed and produced content assets are primarily monetized together as a business combination.unit, referred to as a film group. The film group is evaluated for impairment whenever an event occurs, or circumstances change, indicating the fair value is less
73


than the carrying value. The Company reviews its goodwill for impairment annually, as ofvarious qualitative factors and indicators to assess whether the beginning of the fourth quarter, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may exist.film group is impaired. The Company did not recognize any impairment of goodwillcontent assets in any periods reported.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized upon transfer of control of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. The Company’s contracts include various product or services or a combination of both, which are generally capable of being distinct and are accounted for as separate performance obligations. The Company’s contracts often contain multiple distinct performance obligations.
The Company estimates the transaction price of a contract based on the expected value for which a significant reversal of revenue is not expected to occur. The estimate of the variable consideration is based on the assessment of historical, current, and forecasted performance noted and expected from the performance obligation.
In arrangements with multiple performance obligations, the estimated transaction price of each contract is allocated to each distinct performance obligation based on relative stand-alone selling price (“SSP”). For performance obligations routinely sold separately, the SSP is determined by evaluating such stand-alone sales. For those performance obligations that are not routinely sold separately, the Company determines SSP based on market conditions and other observable inputs.
When the Company sells third-party goods and services, it evaluates whether the Company is the principal, and reports revenue on a gross basis, or an agent, and reports revenue on a net basis. In this assessment, the Company considers if it obtains control of the specified goods or services before they are transferred to the customer, as well as other indicators such as the party primarily responsible for fulfillment, inventory risk, and discretion in establishing price.
Revenue is recorded net of taxes collected from customers which are subsequently remitted to the relevant government authority. The Company does not capitalize any cost associated with contract acquisition because it applies a practical expedient and expenses commissions when incurred as most direct contract acquisition costs relate to contracts that are recognized over a period of one year or less. Sales commissions are included in Sales and marketing expenses in the year ended December 31, 2017.

Purchased intangible assets consistconsolidated statements of operations. The as-invoiced practical expedient is applied when the amount of consideration the Company has a right to invoice corresponds directly with the value to the customer of the entity’s performance completed to date.

Nature of Products and Services
Platform segment:
The Company generates platform revenue from the sale of digital advertising and related services including the OneView ad platform, content distribution services (such as subscription and transaction revenue shares, media and entertainment promotional spending, the sale of Premium Subscriptions, and sale of branded channel buttons on remote controls), and licensing arrangements with service operators and TV brands.
The Company sells digital advertising to advertisers directly or through advertising agencies and to content publishers for their media and entertainment promotions via various campaign tools. Advertising arrangements include video and display advertising delivered through advertising impressions. Advertising arrangements include multiple performance obligations as they contain distinct advertising products or services. For such arrangements, the Company allocates revenue to each distinct performance obligation based on their relative SSP. The Company also generates revenue from customers using its ad platform. For such arrangements, it charges a platform fee, which is a percentage of a customer’s advertising inventory spend during the month, along with data and any add-on features purchased through the platform. The Company recognizes revenue on either a gross or net basis for digital advertising based on its determination as to whether it is acting as the principal in the revenue generation process or as an agent. Where the Company is the principal, it controls the advertising inventory before it is transferred to its customers. This is further supported by the Company being primarily responsible to its customers for the fulfillment and having a level of developed technology. Purchased intangible assetsdiscretion in establishing pricing. Advertising arrangements comprised of multiple performance obligations are recordedrecognized either at a point in time or over time depending on the nature of the distinct performance obligation.
The Company’s content distribution revenue sharing arrangements include cash or non-cash consideration. The revenue sharing arrangements generally apply to new subscriptions for accounts that sign up for new services and at the time of a movie rental or purchase. Revenue is recognized on a net basis as the Company is deemed to be the agent between content publishers and end users. Revenue is recognized on a time elapsed basis, by day, as the services are delivered over the contractual distribution term. Non-cash consideration is usually in the form of advertising inventory, the fair value of which is determined based on relevant internal and third-party data.
74


The Company sells monthly subscriptions for premium content on The Roku Channel for varying fees for different content. Revenue from such Premium Subscription fees is recognized on a gross basis over the service period as the Company is deemed to be the principal in the relationship with the end user. The Company obtains control of the content before transferring to the end user and has latitude in establishing pricing. The Company pays fixed fees per subscriber or fixed percentage of revenue share to the providers of premium content on The Roku Channel based on the datecontractual arrangement and recognizes that in Cost of acquisitionrevenue, platform.
The Company sells branded channel buttons on remote controls of streaming devices that provide one-touch access to a publisher’s content. The Company typically receives a fixed fee per button for each unit sold over a defined distribution period. Revenue is recognized on a time elapsed basis, by day, over the distribution term.
The Company licenses the Roku OS, including updates and amortizedupgrades, to TV brands and service operators. The licensing revenue is recognized at a point in time, when the Company makes the intellectual property available and the control transfers to the customer. The revenue allocated to unspecified upgrades and updates is recognized on a time elapsed basis, by day, over their estimated useful lives following the patternservice period. Professional services revenue is recognized as services are provided or accepted. Hosting fees are recognized on a time elapsed basis, by day, over the service period.
Player segment:
The Company sells the majority of its streaming players and audio products to retail distribution channels in which the economic benefitsU.S. including brick and mortar and online retailers, as well as through the Company’s website. Player revenue primarily consists of the assets will be consumed, generally straight-line.hardware, embedded software, and unspecified upgrades and updates on a when and if-available basis. The carrying amounts of our purchased intangible assets are periodically reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of these assets may not be recoverable or that the useful life is shorter than originally estimated.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company’s long-lived assets include propertyhardware and equipment and other noncurrent assets and are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recovered. Recoverability of assets is measured first by comparing their carrying amounts to their future undiscounted net cash flows. If such assetsembedded software are considered as one performance obligation and revenue is recognized at a point in time when the control transfers to be impaired, the impairmentcustomer. Unspecified upgrades and updates are available to be recognized equalscustomers on a when-and-if available basis. The Company records the amount by which the carryingallocated value of the asset exceeds its fair market value. No impairment was recorded duringunspecified upgrades and updates as deferred revenue and recognizes it as player revenue ratably on a time elapsed basis over the year ended December 31, 2017. estimated economic life of the associated players products.

The Company’s player revenue includes allowances for sales returns and sales incentives in the estimated transaction price. These estimates are based on historical experience and anticipated performance. Shipping charges billed to customers are included in Player revenue and the related shipping costs are included in Cost of revenue, player.
Leases
The Company recordeddetermines if an impairmentarrangement contains a lease at its inception. Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets, accrued liabilities, and operating lease liability in our consolidated balance sheets. ROU assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent its obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of $0.3 millionlease payments over the lease term. As the rate implicit in the lease is not readily determinable, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the commencement date in determining the present value of future lease payments. The Company takes into consideration its credit rating and the length of the lease when calculating the incremental borrowing rate. The Company considers the options to extend or terminate the lease in determining the lease term, when it is reasonably certain to exercise one of the options. The Company combines lease and non-lease components into a single lease component for obsolete internal-use software during the year ended December 31, 2016.

its real estate and equipment leases.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company applies fair value accounting for all assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the consolidated financial statements on a recurring basis.statements. The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature.

The carrying amount of debt approximates fair value due to its variable interest rates.

Inventories

Inventories

The Company’s inventories consist primarily of finished goods and are stated at the lower of cost or marketnet realizable value with cost determined on a first-in, first-out basis and market based on net realizable value. Ifbasis. Provisions are made if the cost of the inventories exceeds their net realizable value, provisions are made currently for the difference between the cost and the market value. The Company evaluates inventory levels and purchase commitments for excess and obsolete products, based on management’s assessment of future demand and market conditions.

75


Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of the assets, generally ranging between eighteen months and five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the lease term or their estimated useful lives, which is generally range from five to ten years.

Website and Internal-Use Software

The Company capitalizes costs to develop its website and internal-use software. The Company expenses all costsCosts that relate to the planning and post-implementation phases of development are expensed as incurred. The Company capitalizes subsequent costsCosts are capitalized when preliminary efforts are successfully completed, management has authorized and committed to funding the project, funding, and it is probable that the project will be completed and will be used as intended. Costs incurred for enhancements that are expected to result in additional material functionality are capitalized. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021, 2020, and December 26, 2015,2019, the Company capitalized website and internal-use software development costs of $2.6$0.5 million, $1.8$2.2 million, and $0.7$0.1 million, respectively.

Capitalized costs are amortized using the straight-line method over anthe estimated useful life of the asset, which is generally two to three years, beginning when the asset is ready for its intended use. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021, 2020, and December 26, 2015,2019, the Company amortized expenses of $1.1$1.0 million, $0.7$0.5 million, and $0.3$1.6 million, respectively.

Streaming Content

The Company licenses certain content for users to access through The Roku Channel. The content licenses can be for a fixed fee and/or advertising revenue share with specific windows of content availability. The Company capitalizes the content license fees and records a corresponding liability when the license period begins, the cost of the content is known and the content is accepted and available for streaming. The Company amortizes the content assets into “Cost of Revenue, Platform” over the contractual window of availability.

At December 31, 2017, content license fees included in “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” are not material.

Revenue Recognition

The Company derives revenue primarily from sales of its players and platform services. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.


Multiple Element Arrangements—The Company commonly enters into multiple-element arrangements. In such arrangements, the Company will combine arrangement deliverables into units of accounting and allocate the total arrangement consideration to the different units of accounting based on a relative selling price hierarchy. To determine the relative selling price of each element, the Company uses vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (“VSOE”), if available, third party evidence (“TPE”), if VSOE is not available, or best estimated selling price (“BESP”), if neither VSOE nor TPE are available. The objective of BESP is to determine the price at which the Company would transact a sale if the product or service were available on a standalone basis. The Company establishes BESP considering multiple factors including, but not limited to, historical prices of products sold on a stand-alone basis, cost and gross margin objectives, competitive pricing practices and customer and market specific considerations. Revenue is recognized for each unit of accounting provided that all revenue recognition criteria have been met.

Players—The Company sells the majority of its players through consumer retail distribution channels, including brick and mortar and online retailers, and through the Company’s website. For sales through consumer retail distribution channels, revenue recognition occurs when title and risk of loss have transferred to the customer which usually occurs upon shipment to the customers or receipt of the products by the customer depending on shipping terms. The Company establishes allowances for expected product returns and these allowances are recorded as a direct reduction to revenue. Return allowances are based on the Company’s historical experience. Certain payments to retailers and distributors such as market development funds, store promotions and price protection are recorded as a reduction of revenue. The Company reduces revenue at the later of the date at which the related player revenue is recognized or the date on which the program is offered. On occasion, these allowances cannot be reasonably and reliably estimated. Player revenue is then recognized at the time the players sell through to the end customer.

The Company’s player sales include two units of accounting: hardware, which includes embedded software, and unspecified upgrades or enhancements on a when-and-if available basis. The Company has determined that its hardware and embedded software be considered as one single unit of accounting, because the hardware and software individually do not have standalone value and are not sold separately. The Company initially records the relative selling price of the unspecified upgrades or enhancements on a when-and-if-available basis as deferred revenue, and then recognizes the deferred revenue into player, net revenue ratably on a straight-line basis over the estimated economic life of the associated players.

Shipping charges billed to customers are included in player revenue and the related shipping costs are included in cost of player revenue. Revenue is recorded net of taxes collected or accrued. Sales taxes are recorded as current liabilities until remitted to the relevant government authority.

Platform—The Company earns platform revenue from fees received from advertisers and content publishers and licensing its technology and proprietary operating system to service operators and TV brands. Platform revenue primarily includes fees earned or derived from the sale of digital advertising, revenue sharing with content publishers for new or recurring user subscriptions activated through the Company’s platform and revenue share from user purchases of content publishers’ media through its platform. The Company also earns revenue from the sale of branded channel buttons on remote controls. Licensing revenues from service operators are mostly generated from unit activation or flat fees and ongoing maintenance fees. Licensing revenues from TV brands are generated on a flat fee basis or from per unit licensing fees earned.

Digital advertising includes video and display ads that are served on the Company’s platform. Digital advertising revenue consists of video and display advertising commonly sold on a cost per thousand impression basis. Advertising revenue arrangements are evidenced by a fully executed insertion order. Revenue is recognized in the period the impressions and promotional media are delivered.

Fees derived from the Company’s billing services supporting new or recurring user subscriptions activated through its platform and from purchases of content publishers’ media are recognized as transacted at the net amount retained by the Company, generally equal to a fixed percentage of the price charged by the content provider or a contractual flat fee. When the content publisher is responsible for user billing, the Company recognizes revenue from its share of the fees on an as reported basis, in arrears, on a monthly or quarterly basis.


The Company also earns fees through the sale of branded channel buttons on remote controls. These branded buttons provide one-touch, direct access to the providers’ content on the Company’s platform. The Company typically receives a fixed fee per button unit, and revenue is recognized as remote controls are shipped by the Company or reported as shipped by TV brands.

Revenues earned from service operators and TV brands in the licensing of the Company’s technology and proprietary operating system are accounted for under software revenue recognition guidance. The Company has been unable to establish VSOE for any component of these licensing arrangements and therefore these arrangements are accounted for as a single unit of accounting and revenue over the term of the relationship. Arrangements with service operators are generally comprised of a license for the technology and proprietary operating system, unspecified upgrades or enhancements, hosting of a branded channel store, and engineering and support services. Arrangements with TV brands commonly include a license to the technology and proprietary operating system over a specified term including updates and upgrades.

Deferred Revenue and Deferred Cost of Revenue

The Company’s deferred revenue reflectreflects fees received from licensing and service arrangements, including advertising,in advance that will be recognized as revenue over time or as services are rendered. Deferred revenue balances consist of the amount of player salesrevenue allocated to unspecified upgrades or enhancementsand updates on a when-and-if available basis, licensing and services fees received from service operators and TV brands, and advance payments from advertisers and content publishers.

publishers where performance obligations are not yet fulfilled. Deferred cost of revenue consists of amounts associated with related deferred revenues and is recognized as cost of revenue in the same manner as its respective deferred revenue.

Deferred revenue and the associated deferred cost of revenue expected to be realized within one year areis classified as a current liabilities and current assets, respectively,liability and the remaining areis recorded as noncurrent liabilities and noncurrent assets, respectively.

Warranty Costs

The Company generally provides for the estimated cost of hardware and software warranties at the time the related revenue is recognized. The Company assesses the adequacy of its preexisting warranty liabilities and adjusts the amounts as necessary based on actual experience and changes in future estimates.

a non-current liability.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed when incurred and are included in salesSales and marketing expense in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company incurred advertising costs of $3.4$35.2 million, $3.9$7.1 million, and $4.1$7.3 million for the years December 31, 2017, 20162021, 2020, and December 26, 20152019, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company measures compensation expense for all stock-based awards, including stock options and restricted stock units and stock options granted to employees, based on the estimated fair value of the award on the date of grant. For restricted stock units, the grant date fair value is based on the closing market price of the Company’s Class A common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of each stock option granted is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricingoption pricing model. The Company accounts for forfeitures as they occur. Stock-based compensation is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite vesting period. For
The Black-Scholes option pricing model used to fair value stock options include the years ended December 31, 2016, and December 26, 2015 the stock-based compensation was recorded netfollowing assumptions:
Fair Value of estimated forfeitures using a forfeiture rate based on an analysis of the Company’s actual historical forfeitures.Our Common Stock. The Company adopted new guidance effective January 1, 2017 to recognize forfeitures as they occur.

The Company accounts for stock options issued to nonemployees based on the fair value of the awards determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The fair value of stock options granted to nonemployees is remeasured as the stock options vest, and the resulting change in fair value, if any, is recognized in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations during the period the related services are rendered, generally four years.


The Company accounts for restricted stock units issued to employees based on the grant date fair value which is determined based onuses the closing market price of theits Class A common stock as reported on The Nasdaq Global Select Market on the date of grant.

Expected Term. The expenseexpected term of employee stock options represents the weighted-average period that the stock options are expected to remain outstanding. The Company uses the simplified calculation of the expected term, which reflects weighted-average time to vest and the contractual life of the stock options granted, in absence of its own historical exercise data.
Volatility. The expected volatility is recognizedderived from an average of the historical volatilities of several peer companies which are similar in size and operational and economic activities.
Risk-free Rate. The risk-free interest rate is based on the Company’s consolidated statementyields of operationsU.S. Treasury securities with maturities similar to the expected term for each of our stock options.
Dividend Yield. The expected dividend is assumed to be zero as the Company has never paid dividends and has no current plans to pay any dividends on a straight-line basis over the requisite vesting period.

its common stock.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using an asset and liability approach. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the consolidated financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using
76


enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts that are more likely than not to be realized.

Net Loss per Share

Since

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
On January 1, 2021, the Company adopted the guidance issued in Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. The ASU simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles and also simplifies areas such as franchise taxes, step-up in tax basis of goodwill, separate entity financial statements, and interim recognition of enactment of tax laws or rate changes. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In March 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. This guidance provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying U.S. GAAP to contract modifications, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) that is expected to be discontinued, subject to meeting certain criteria. The guidance is effective as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. The Company made a policy election in the second quarter of 2020 to elect a different reference rate for the Credit Agreement (as defined below) when LIBOR is discontinued.
On January 1, 2020, the Company adopted the guidance in ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, using the modified retrospective adoption method and recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment to the beginning balance of accumulated deficit of approximately $1.1 million. The measurement of credit losses for newly recognized financial assets and subsequent changes in the allowance for credit losses are recorded in the statements of operations. This impact mainly relates to credit losses recognized on the Company’s doubtful accounts. As the Company did not have any available-for-sale debt securities as of the adoption date, there was no additional impact to accumulated deficit.
On January 1, 2020, the Company adopted the guidance in ASU 2019-02, Entertainment—Films—Other Assets—Film Costs (Subtopic 926-20) and Entertainment—Broadcasters—Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Subtopic 920-350): Improvements to Accounting for Costs of Films and License Agreements for Program Materials, in order to align the accounting for production costs of an episodic television series with the accounting for production costs of films by removing the content distinction for capitalization. ASU 2019-02 required that an entity reassess estimates of the use of a film in a loss positionfilm group and account for all periods presented, basic net loss per share isany changes prospectively. In addition, ASU 2019-02 required that an entity test films and license agreements for program material for impairment at a film group level when the same as diluted net loss per share for all periods asfilm or license agreements are predominantly monetized with other films and license agreements. There was no material impact to the inclusion of all potential common shares outstanding and potentially dilutive securities would have been anti-dilutive.

Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Standards Not Yet Adopted

In January 2017,October 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill2021-08, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Accounting for Contract Assets and OtherContract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers, to require companies to apply Accounting Standards Codification, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which eliminates Step 2606) to recognize and measure contract assets and contract liabilities from the goodwill impairment test which measurescontracts with customers acquired in a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. Under this guidance, an entity should perform its annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, and should recognize an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, with the loss not exceeding the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.business combination. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The guidance should be applied prospectively. The Company is evaluating the impact of this new guidance on the consolidated financial statements and the related disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which changes the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities should be accounted for as an acquisition of a business or group of assets. The guidance requires an entity to evaluate if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; if so, the set of transferred assets and activities is not a business. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The guidance should be applied prospectively to any transactions occurring on or after the adoption date. The Company is evaluating the impact of this new guidance on the consolidated financial statements and the related disclosures.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, which simplifies certain aspects of the income tax accounting for Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets. Under current GAAP, the tax effects of intra-entity asset transfers (intercompany sales) are deferred until the transferred asset is sold to a third party or otherwise recovered through use. This is an exception to the principle in ASC 740, Income Taxes, that generally requires comprehensive recognition of current and deferred income taxes. The new guidance allows a reporting entity to recognize the tax expense from the sale of the asset in the seller’s tax jurisdiction when the transfer occurs, even though the pre-tax effects of that transaction are eliminated in consolidation. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017,2022, including interim reporting periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currentlyexpects to adopt ASU 2021-08 in the process of evaluating the effect of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements and the related disclosures.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force), which addresses classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments related to the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact of this new guidance on the consolidated financial statements and the related disclosures.


In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), related to new accounting and reporting guidelines for leasing arrangements. The guidance requires organizations that lease assets to recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet related to the rights and obligations created by those leases, regardless of whether they are classified as finance or operating leases. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The new standard is to be applied using a modified retrospective approach. The Company is evaluating the impact of this new guidance on the consolidated financial statements and the related disclosures.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, related to the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact of this new guidance on the consolidated financial statements and the related disclosures.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), related to the recognition and reporting of revenue that establishes a comprehensive new revenue recognition model designed to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer in an amount that reflects the consideration the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. In 2016 the FASB issued amendments on this guidance with the same effective date and transition guidance. The Company plans to adopt the new revenue standard in its first quarter of 2018 using the modified retrospective approach, which requires the cumulative impact of initially applying the guidance to be recognized as an adjustment to our accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2018, the date of adoption. Prior periods will not be retroactively adjusted.

The Company is currently in the process of finalizing the impact of the new standard on its accounting policies, processes and system requirements. Furthermore, the Company has made and will continue to make investments in systems to enable timely and accurate reporting under the new standard. The Company expects that the adjustment from the adoption will result in a decrease to the accumulated deficit in the range of $32.0 million to $42.0 million.

fiscal 2022. The Company believes that the new standardadoption of this guidance will not have a material impact accountingon the financial statements.

77


3. REVENUE
The Company’s disaggregated revenue is represented by the 2 reportable segments discussed in Note 17.
The contract balances include the following (in thousands):
 As of December 31,
 202120202019
Accounts receivable, net$752,393 $523,852 $332,673 
Contract assets (included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets)46,952 7,431 3,588 
Deferred revenue, current portion45,760 55,465 39,861 
Deferred revenue, non-current portion28,726 21,283 15,370 
Total deferred revenue$74,486 $76,748 $55,231 
Accounts receivable are recorded at the amount invoiced, net of an allowance for sales returns, sales incentives, and doubtful accounts. Payment terms can vary by customer and contract.
The timing of revenue arrangements as follows:

Revenuerecognition may differ from the licensingtiming of invoicing to customers. Contract assets are created when invoicing occurs subsequent to revenue recognition. Contract assets are transferred to accounts receivable when the right to invoice becomes unconditional. The Company’s technologycontract assets are current in nature and proprietary operating systemare included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets. Contract assets increased by $39.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2021 and by $3.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2020 primarily due to service operatorsan increase in the growth of platform revenue combined with the timing of billing which falls into a subsequent period.

Deferred revenue reflects consideration invoiced prior to the completion of performance obligations and TV brands, will be recognized earlier and could resultrevenue recognition. Deferred revenue decreased by approximately $2.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2021 primarily due to the timing of fulfillment of performance obligations related to content arrangements offset by an increase in greater variabilitydeferred revenue from advertising arrangements due to growth in revenue recognition;

Revenue resulting from the variable consideration (e.g. revenue share from user subscriptions and media purchases through the platform or salebusiness and an increase in the deferral period of branded channel buttons onplayer revenue for its remote controls) outlinedunspecified upgrades. Deferred revenue increased by approximately $21.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2020 due to the increase in estimated values of content publisher and licensing partner arrangements is estimated and allocated forchange in the entire contract periodtiming of fulfillment of performance obligations of approximately $12.4 million, and then recognized based onhigher growth in the percentage of completion across various performance obligations; and

Expanded disclosures.

The Company expectsplayer segment, resulting in a net increase in deferred revenue recognition related to playersunspecified upgrades and advertising to remain relatively unchanged underupdates of approximately $8.4 million.

Revenue recognized during the new guidance.

3. business combination

On September 6, 2017, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of a privately held technology company located in Denmark to enhance the Company’s player product offering, for an aggregate purchase price of $3.5 million. The Company paid $3.0 million of the aggregate purchase price at the time of acquisition with $0.5 million payable one year after acquisition date. In addition, the Company issued 0.1 million shares of its Class B common stock to two of the founders as part of a continuing services arrangement. The shares are subject to a right of repurchase which lapses over a three year period at varying prices per share. In addition, the Company incurred approximately $0.4 million of costs related to the acquisition which isended December 31, 2021 from amounts included in the generaltotal deferred revenue as of December 31, 2020 was $56.2 million. Revenue recognized during the year ended December 31, 2020 from amounts included in the total deferred revenue as of December 31, 2019 was $42.9 million.

Revenue allocated to remaining performance obligations represents estimated contracted revenue that has not yet been recognized which includes unearned revenue and amounts that will be invoiced and recognized as revenue in future periods. Estimated contracted revenue was $1,148.3 million as of December 31, 2021 of which the Company expects to recognize approximately 43% over the next 12 months and the remainder thereafter.
The Company recognized $28.6 million and $14.4 million during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, from performance obligations that were satisfied in previous periods due to the changes in the estimated transaction price of its revenue contracts.
The Company did not have any customer that accounted for more than 10% of its total net revenue as of December 31, 2021. Customer C accounted for 12% and 14% of the total net revenue during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
4. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
Nielsen’s Advanced Video Advertising Business
On February 28, 2021, the Company entered into an Asset and Stock Purchase Agreement (the “ASPA”) to purchase the Advanced Video Advertising (“AVA”) business from Nielsen Holdings PLC (“Nielsen”). The AVA business consists primarily of video automatic content recognition and dynamic ad insertion technologies. On April 15, 2021, the Company closed the transaction, acquiring from Nielsen the AVA business, consisting of certain assets and liabilities and all of the
78


equity interests in a subsidiary associated with the AVA business (the “Acquisition”). In conjunction with the Acquisition, the Company and Nielsen entered into a strategic commercial arrangement under which the parties will provide certain advertising measurement solutions to each other. The Company acquired Nielsen’s AVA business to accelerate its launch of an end-to-end linear ad replacement solution and to further integrate Nielsen’s ad and content measurement products into the Company’s ad platform.
The total purchase consideration for Nielsen’s AVA business was $53.4 million, which consisted of (i) $38.5 million paid in cash and (ii) $21.4 million of non-cash consideration related to obligations to deliver services to Nielsen, offset by (iii) $6.5 million of services to be received from Nielsen. The obligations to deliver services to Nielsen were recorded at fair value using the incremental cash flow method. The services to be delivered to Nielsen are recognized within Other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations over the six year service period. The services to be received from Nielsen represent contract terms that the Company entered into for future goods and services that were recorded at fair value using the incremental cash flow method. These services are recognized as Cost of revenue, platform in the consolidated statements of operations over the six year service period.
In addition, there are earn-out conditions in the ASPA which may trigger an additional payment to Nielsen. As of December 31, 2021, no contingent consideration conditions have been triggered. The Company incurred $3.9 million in acquisition-related expenses and has recorded them in General and administrative expenses.

expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

The preliminaryDuring the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company obtained additional information regarding facts and circumstances in existence as of the acquisition date. As a result, the Company recorded a measurement period adjustment in the fourth quarter of 2021 consisting of a $6.0 million increase to purchase price allocation includes $1.4consideration, $4.2 million of goodwill and $2.2 million of identifiabledecrease to intangible assets which primarily consist of developed technology, with an expected useful life of approximately four years. Goodwill represents the excessacquired, $4.5 million increase to other long-term liabilities, and $14.7 million increase to goodwill.

The allocation of the purchase price over the fair value of the netconsideration to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, reflecting measurement period adjustments through December 31, 2021, is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes. based on estimated fair values and is as follows (in thousands):
Fair Values
Assets acquired
Cash and cash equivalents$3,057 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets85 
Property and equipment, net584 
Intangible assets:
Developed technology11,000 
IPR&D technology7,500 
Goodwill36,790 
Operating lease right-of-use assets1,235 
Other non-current assets1,905 
Total assets acquired62,156 
Liabilities assumed
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities(1,168)
Operating lease liabilities, non-current portion(830)
Other long-term liabilities(6,767)
Total liabilities assumed(8,765)
Total purchase consideration$53,391
The goodwill in this transactionexcess of the total consideration over the tangible assets, intangible assets, and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is primarily attributable to expected synergies in advertising offerings and cross-selling opportunities. The majority of the goodwill recorded is deductible for tax purposes.
The fair value of the developed technology has been estimated using the relief-from-royalty method. The key valuation assumptions include the Company’s estimates of expected future earnings and royalty rate.The Company amortizes the fair value of the developed technology on a straight-line basis over its useful life. The fair value of the in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) technology has been estimated using the multi-period-excess-earnings
79


method. The key valuation assumptions include the Company’s estimates of expected future revenue and margin.Once the project reaches technological feasibility, the Company will amortize the fair value of the IPR&D technology on a straight-line basis over its useful life.
The valuation of the intangible assets acquired workforce and expected operating synergies.

from Nielsen’s AVA business along with their estimated useful lives, is as follows (in thousands, except years):

Estimated Fair ValueEstimated Weighted-Average Useful Lives
(in years)
Developed technology$11,000 5.9
IPR&D technology7,500 0
Estimated fair value of acquired intangible assets$18,500 5.9
The results of operations of the acquired companyNielsen’s AVA business are included in the Company’s operating results of the Company beginning on the date the acquisition was completed. Actual and pro forma results of operations have not been presented as the total amountsacquisition. The revenue, cost of revenue, and net incomegross profit recorded by the Company in its consolidated statements of operations from the acquisition date to December 31, 2021 are not materialmaterial.
This Old House
On March 19, 2021, the Company acquired all outstanding shares of TOH Intermediate Holdings, LLC (“This Old House”), a home improvement media business, according to the Company'sterms and conditions of the Equity Purchase Agreement. The Company acquired the This Old House business because the Company believes the content aligns with The Roku Channel’s ad-supported growth strategy.
The total purchase consideration for This Old House was $97.8 million, paid entirely in cash. The Company incurred $2.4 million in acquisition-related expenses that are recorded in General and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
80


The allocation of the purchase consideration to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, reflecting measurement period adjustments through December 31, 2021, is based on estimated fair values and is as follows (in thousands):
Fair Values
Assets acquired
Cash and cash equivalents$
Accounts receivable5,830 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets7,310 
Property and equipment, net307 
Intangible assets:
Tradename20,000 
Customer relationships700 
Goodwill46,671 
Operating lease right-of-use assets5,498 
Other non-current assets23,487 
Total assets acquired109,810 
Liabilities assumed
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities(2,747)
Deferred revenue, current portion(4,146)
Operating lease liabilities, non-current portion(4,262)
Deferred revenue, non-current portion(816)
Other long-term liabilities(28)
Total liabilities assumed(11,999)
Total purchase consideration$97,811
Other non-current assets include $22.5 million of content assets acquired. The fair value of the content assets has been estimated using the income approach. Amortization expense related to the content assets is recorded on an accelerated basis according to the pattern of monetization.
The excess of the total consideration over the tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets, and assumed liabilities is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is primarily attributable to expected synergies in the advertising offerings as the Company brings more free ad-supported content to the users. The goodwill recorded is deductible for tax purposes.
The fair value of the tradename has been estimated using the relief-from-royalty method. The key valuation assumptions include the Company’s estimates of expected future revenue and royalty rate. The Company amortizes the fair value of the tradename on a straight-line basis over its useful life.
The valuation of the intangible assets acquired from This Old House along with their estimated useful lives, is as follows (in thousands, except years):
Estimated Fair ValueEstimated Weighted-Average Useful Lives
(in years)
Tradename$20,000 10.0
Customer relationships700 4.0
Estimated fair value of acquired intangible assets$20,700 9.8
The operations of This Old House were included in the Company’s operating results for all periods presented.

beginning on the date of acquisition. The Company recorded an expenseplatform revenue of $0.2$18.7 million, cost of revenue, platform, of $11.8 million and gross profit of $6.9 million in its consolidated statements of operations from the acquisition date to December 31, 2021.

81


5. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase consideration in a business combination over the fair value of tangible and intangible assets acquired net of the liabilities assumed. All goodwill relates to the platform segment.
The following table reflects the carrying value of goodwill (in thousands):
Carrying Value
Balance as of December 31, 2019$74,116 
Adjustments:
Dataxu working capital adjustment(1,058)
Balance as of December 31, 2020$73,058 
Additions:
This Old House acquisition46,671
Nielsen AVA business acquisition36,790
Other immaterial acquisition5,000
Balance as of December 31, 2021$161,519 
Goodwill is evaluated for impairment annually. No impairment was recognized during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019.
Intangible Assets
The following table is the summary of Company’s intangible assets (in thousands):
As of December 31, 2021
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying
Amount
Weighted-Average Useful Lives
(in years)
Developed technology$73,367 $(25,350)$48,017 5.9
Customer relationships14,100 (7,395)6,705 4.0
Tradename20,400 (1,966)18,434 9.8
Patents4,076 (606)3,470 14.0
Intangible assets subject to amortization$111,943 $(35,317)$76,626 6.7
IPR&D technology7,500 — 7,500 
Total Intangible assets$119,443 $(35,317)$84,126 
 As of December 31, 2020
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying
Amount
Weighted-Average Useful Lives
(in years)
Developed technology$62,367 $(13,439)$48,928 5.9
Customer relationships13,400 (3,908)9,492 4.0
Tradename400 (400)— 0.5
Patents4,076 (315)3,761 14.0
Total Intangible assets$80,243 $(18,062)$62,181 6.0
The Company recorded expenses of $17.3 million, $14.5 million, and $2.8 million for amortization of intangible assetassets during the yearyears ended December 31, 2017.2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, the Company recorded amortization of developed technology in Cost of revenue, platform and Research and development expenses. The Company recorded amortization of customer relationships and tradenames in
82


Sales and marketing expenses, and recorded amortization of patents in General and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
As of December 31, 2021, the estimated future amortization expensesexpense for intangible asset is $0.6 million, $0.6 million, $0.5 million and $0.3 millionassets for the next five years ending in December 31, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively.

4. Balance sheet components

Balance sheet components consisted of the following:

thereafter is as follows (in thousands):

Year Ending December 31, 
2022$17,745 
202317,066
202414,275
202512,571
20264,074
Thereafter10,895
Total$76,626 

6. BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS
Accounts Receivable, net: Accounts receivable, net consisted of the following:

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Gross accounts receivable

 

$

138,292

 

 

$

95,686

 

Allowance for sales returns

 

 

(6,907

)

 

 

(6,916

)

Allowance for sales incentives

 

 

(10,442

)

 

 

(8,503

)

Other allowances

 

 

(390

)

 

 

(794

)

Total allowances

 

 

(17,739

)

 

 

(16,213

)

Total Accounts Receivable—net

 

$

120,553

 

 

$

79,473

 

Allowance for Sales Returns: Allowance for sales returns consist of the following activities:

(in thousands):

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Beginning balance

 

$

(6,916

)

 

$

(9,514

)

Charged to revenue

 

 

(19,089

)

 

 

(20,810

)

Utilization of sales return reserve

 

 

19,098

 

 

 

23,408

 

Ending balance

 

$

(6,907

)

 

$

(6,916

)

 As of December 31,
 20212020
Accounts receivable, gross$809,220 $565,088 
Less: Allowances
Allowance for sales returns6,015 5,912 
Allowance for sales incentives48,411 30,838 
Allowance for doubtful accounts2,158 4,181 
Other allowances243 305 
Total allowances56,827 41,236 
Accounts Receivable, net$752,393 $523,852 

Allowance for Sales Incentive: Allowance for sales incentive consisted of the following activities:

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Beginning balance

 

$

(8,503

)

 

$

(7,642

)

Charged to revenue

 

 

(44,264

)

 

 

(36,626

)

Utilization of sales incentive reserve

 

 

42,325

 

 

 

35,765

 

Ending balance

 

$

(10,442

)

 

$

(8,503

)


Property and Equipment, net: Property and equipment, net consisted of the following:

following (in thousands):

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

As of December 31,

 

(in thousands)

 

20212020

Computers and equipment

 

$

11,631

 

 

$

8,787

 

Computers and equipment$38,473 $30,859 

Leasehold improvements

 

 

8,437

 

 

 

4,201

 

Leasehold improvements182,229 144,013 

Website and internal-use software

 

 

5,461

 

 

 

2,902

 

Internal-use softwareInternal-use software7,274 6,744 

Office equipment and furniture

 

 

1,987

 

 

 

1,452

 

Office equipment and furniture20,829 19,661 

Total property and equipment

 

 

27,516

 

 

 

17,342

 

Property and equipment, grossProperty and equipment, gross248,805 201,277 

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

(12,780

)

 

 

(7,814

)

Accumulated depreciation and amortization(71,238)(46,080)

Property and Equipment, net

 

$

14,736

 

 

$

9,528

 

Property and Equipment, net$177,567 $155,197 

Depreciation and amortization expense, for property and equipment assets, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021, 2020, and December 26, 20152019 was $5.2$25.4 million, $5.3$21.7 million, and $2.6$12.8 million, respectively.

83


Accrued Liabilities: Accrued liabilities consisted of the following:

following (in thousands):

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Accrued royalty expense

 

$

17,165

 

 

$

14,940

 

Accrued inventory

 

 

2,382

 

 

 

4,274

 

Accrued payroll and related expenses

 

 

8,699

 

 

 

5,342

 

Accrued cost of revenue

 

 

12,210

 

 

 

7,264

 

Accrued payments to content publishers

 

 

24,037

 

 

 

8,554

 

Sales tax and tax related liabilities

 

 

751

 

 

 

769

 

Other accrued expenses

 

 

7,100

 

 

 

5,013

 

Total Accrued Liabilities

 

$

72,344

 

 

$

46,156

 

 As of December 31,
 20212020
Payments due to content publishers$165,894 $106,576 
Accrued cost of revenue142,014 98,285 
Marketing, retail and merchandising costs47,428 43,645 
Operating lease liability, current37,116 35,647 
Content liability, current70,462 6,165 
Other accrued expenses86,141 57,350 
Total Accrued Liabilities$549,055 $347,668 


Deferred Revenue: Deferred revenue consisted of the following:

following (in thousands):

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

(in thousands)

 

As of December 31,
20212020
Platform, currentPlatform, current$22,240 $27,587 

Player, current

 

$

15,479

 

 

$

13,611

 

Player, current23,520 27,878 

Platform, current

 

 

19,022

 

 

 

10,341

 

Total deferred revenue, current

 

 

34,501

 

 

 

23,952

 

Total deferred revenue, current45,760 55,465 
Platform, non-currentPlatform, non-current9,324 9,909 

Player, non-current

 

 

5,837

 

 

 

5,215

 

Player, non-current19,402 11,374 

Platform, non-current

 

 

42,674

 

 

 

23,869

 

Total deferred revenue, non-current

 

 

48,511

 

 

 

29,084

 

Total deferred revenue, non-current28,726 21,283 

Total Deferred Revenue

 

$

83,012

 

 

$

53,036

 

Total Deferred Revenue$74,486 $76,748 



5.

Other Long-term Liabilities: Other Long-term liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
As of December 31,
20212020
Content liability, non-current$51,211 $1,380 
Other long-term liabilities31,274 1,739 
Total Other long-term liabilities$82,485 $3,119 
7. CONTENT ASSETS
Content assets, net recorded as part of Other non-current assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
As of December 31,
20212020
Licensed content, net$199,290 $7,907 
Produced content:
Released, less amortization20,030 — 
Completed, not released881 — 
In production3,512 — 
Total produced content, net24,423 $— 
Total Content Assets, net$223,713 $7,907 
On January 8, 2021, the Company entered into an agreement with the mobile-first video distribution service known as Quibi to acquire certain content rights. The transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition. As discussed in Note 4, the Company also acquired content assets as part of the This Old House acquisition. The increase of $215.8 million in
84


content assets during the year ended December 31, 2021 includes content assets acquired from Quibi and This Old House, programming content licensed from various other content publishers, as well as content produced during the year.
Amortization of content assets is included in Cost of revenue, platform in the consolidated statements of operations and is reflected in the table below (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31,
20212020
Licensed content$84,133 $22,392 
Produced content11,437 — 
Total amortization costs$95,570 $22,392 
The following table reflects the amortization expense for the next three years for content assets, net (in thousands):
Year Ending December 31,Licensed contentProduced contentTotal
2022$86,584 $4,055 $90,639 
202338,861 4,202 43,063 
202423,293 3,951 27,244 
Total$148,738 $12,208 $160,946 
8. FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURE

The Company’s financial assets measured at fair value are as follows (in thousands):
 As of December 31, 2021As of December 31, 2020
 Fair ValueLevel 1Fair ValueLevel 1
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash$1,130,172 $1,130,172 $1,021,022 $1,021,022 
Money market funds1,015,871 1,015,871 71,793 71,793 
Restricted cash, current— — 434 434 
Restricted cash, non-current1,627 1,627 — — 
Total assets measured and recorded at fair value$2,147,670 $2,147,670 $1,093,249 $1,093,249 
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal market (or most advantageous market, in the absence of a principal market) for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Further, entities are required to maximizethe Company maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizeminimizes the use of unobservable inputs in measuring fair value, and to utilizeutilizes a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Financial assets and liabilities measured using Level 1 inputs include cash equivalents including restricted cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities.

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original or remaining maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. The Company measured money market funds of $1,015.9 million and $71.8 million as cash equivalents as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, using Level 1 inputs.

Level 2—Observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable or are derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data by correlation or other means.

The Company doesdid not usehave any Level 2 inputs to measure any assets or liabilities.

instruments as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.

85


Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities and reflect the Company’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances.

The Company’s preferred stock warrant liability was measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs upon issuance and at each reporting date. Inputs used to determine the estimated fair value of the warrant liability as of the valuation date included remaining contractual term of the warrants, the risk-free interest rate, the volatility of comparable public companies over the remaining term, and the fair value of underlying shares. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the preferred stock warrant liability were the fair value of the underlying stock at the valuation date and the estimated term of the warrants. Generally, increases (decreases) in the fair value of the underlying stock and estimated term would result in a directionally similar impact to the fair value measurement.

The Company did not have an outstanding preferred warrant liabilityany Level 3 instruments as of December 31, 2017 as all preferred stock warrants were converted into common stock warrants pursuant to the IPO. A reconciliation of the preferred stock warrant liability measured2021 and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs is as follows:

2020.

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

December 26,

2015

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Convertible preferred stock warrant

   liability — beginning balance

 

$

9,990

 

 

$

10,878

 

 

$

10,787

 

Fair value of new warrants issued

 

 

2,032

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value*

 

 

40,333

 

 

 

(888

)

 

 

1,768

 

Reclassification to preferred stock upon exercise

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,677

)

Reclassification to APIC upon conversion

   to common warrants

 

 

(52,355

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Convertible preferred stock warrant

   liability — ending balance

 

$

 

 

$

9,990

 

 

$

10,878

 

*

Recognized in the consolidated statements of operations within other expense—net.


Assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis

Non-financial assets such as goodwill, intangible assets, and property plant, and equipment, operating lease right-of-use assets, and content assets are evaluated for impairment and adjusted to fair value using Level 3 inputs, only when impairment is recognized. There were no indicators
9. LEASES
The Company has entered into operating leases primarily for office real estate. The leases have remaining terms ranging from one year to 10 years and may include options to extend or terminate the lease. The depreciable life of impairment that required a fair value analysis duringROU assets is limited by the expected lease term.
The components of lease expense are as follows (in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Operating lease cost (1)$46,410 $42,127 $27,596 
Variable lease cost15,080 12,116 4,928 
Net operating lease cost$61,490 $54,243 $32,524 
(1) Operating lease cost is presented net of sublease income. Sublease income for the years ended December 31, 20172021, 2020, and 2016.

6.2019 was not material.

Supplemental cash flow information related to leases is as follows (in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:  
Operating cash outflows from operating leases$51,657 $30,664 $17,721 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations:
Operating leases$110,845 $12,031 $267,048 
Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases is as follows (in thousands, except lease term and discount rate):
 As of December 31,
 20212020
Operating lease right-of-use assets$345,660 $266,197 
Included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
Operating lease liability, current37,116 35,647 
Operating lease liability, non-current394,724 307,936 
Total operating lease liability$431,840 $343,583 
Weighted-average remaining lease term:
Operating leases (in years)8.389.05
Weighted-average discount rate:
Operating leases3.98 %4.60 %
86


Future lease payments under operating leases as of December 31, 2021 are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ending December 31,Operating Leases
2022$52,636 
202363,548 
202462,162 
202561,649 
202660,044 
Thereafter218,954 
Total future lease payments518,993 
Less: imputed interest(79,073)
Less: expected tenant improvement allowance(8,080)
Total$431,840 
As of December 31, 2021, the Company’s commitment relating to operating leases that have not yet commenced was $198.4 million. These operating leases willcommence starting in fiscal year 2022 with lease terms of approximately two to 12 years.
10. DEBT

Bank—Term Loan

In July 2011,

The Company’s outstanding debt as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 is as follows (in thousands):
 As of December 31,
 20212020
 Amount 
Effective
Interest Rate
Amount 
Effective
Interest Rate
Term Loan A Facility$90,000 2.0 %$95,000 2.0 %
Less: Debt issuance costs(132)(258)
Net carrying amount of debt$89,868 $94,742 
The carrying amount of debt approximates fair value due to its variable interest rates. The interest expense for the Company amended its loanyears ended December 31, 2021 and security agreement (the “LSA”) with a financial institution (the “Bank”). The LSA provided for a term loan borrowing of $5.02020 relating to the Credit Agreement is $2.2 million and a revolving line of credit of up to $7.5$2.6 million, both of which could be drawn on under certain conditions. The Company borrowed $4.5 million in July 2011. Advances under the term loan incurred a financing payment equal to 2% of the advance payable at the end of the loan, in addition to quarterly interest payments at a fixed annual rate of 10%. Borrowings on the line of credit bore interest at a premium of 1.75% over the bank’s prime rate. The length of the term loan borrowing was 48 months,respectively.
Senior Secured Term Loan A and the length of the revolving line of credit was 12 months. The LSA was secured by all assets of the Company and the Company repaid the loan in July 2015.

The Company had previously amended the LSA at various dates and, in November 2014, replaced the LSA with an amended and restated loan and security agreement (the “Restated 2014 LSA”) providing advances under the revolving line of credit up to $30.0 million and extending the line of credit to September 30, 2016. Additionally, the Restated 2014 LSA provides for letters of credit to be issued up to the lesser of the available line of credit, reduced by outstanding advances and drawn but unreimbursed letters of credit, or $5.0 million. The Restated 2014 LSA agreement contains a financial covenant to maintain a minimum required adjusted quick ratio (calculated as the sum of cash maintained with the Bank and the Bank’s affiliates and net billed account receivable balances, divided by current liabilities plus all outstanding obligations to the Bank under the revolving line, less deferred revenue), and non-financial covenants including providing the audited annual financial statements to the bank within 180 days following the year end.

In May 2015,Revolving Credit Facilities

On February 19, 2019, the Company entered into a first amendmentCredit Agreement with Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. (as amended on May 3, 2019, the “Credit Agreement”), which provides for (i) a four-year revolving credit facility in the aggregate principal amount of up to $100.0 million (the “Revolving Credit Facility”), (ii) a four-year delayed draw term loan A facility in the aggregate principal amount of up to $100.0 million (the “Term Loan A Facility”), and (iii) an uncommitted incremental facility, subject to the Restated 2014 LSAsatisfaction of certain financial and other conditions, in the amount of up to (v) $50.0 million, plus (w) 1.0x of the Company’s EBITDA for the most recently completed four fiscal quarter period, plus (x) an additional amount at the Company’s discretion, so long as, on a pro forma basis at the time of incurrence, the Company’s secured leverage ratio does not exceed 1.50 to 1.00, plus (y) voluntary prepayments of the Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan A Facility to the extent accompanied by concurrent reductions to the applicable Credit Facility (together with the Bank. The advances underRevolving Credit Facility and the first amendment toTerm Loan A Facility, collectively, the Restated LSA carry a floating per annum“Credit Facility”).
On November 18, 2019, the Company borrowed the Term Loan A facility in the aggregate principal amount of $100.0 million. In March 2020, the Company borrowed the available balance of $69.3 million from the Revolving Credit Facility. For both borrowings, the Company elected an interest rate equal to the prime rate or the primeadjusted one-month LIBOR rate plus 2.5% dependingan applicable margin of 1.75% based on the Company’s secured leverage ratio. In May 2020, the Company repaid the outstanding balance on the Revolving Credit Facility.
Loans under the Term Loan A Facility amortize in equal quarterly installments beginning on March 31, 2020, in an aggregate annual amount equal to (i) on or prior to December 31, 2021, 1.25% of the drawn principal amount of the Term Loan Facility or $1.25 million and (ii) thereafter, 2.50% of the drawn principal amount of the Term Loan Facility or $2.5 million, with the remaining balance payable on the maturity date of the Term Loan A Facility in February 2023. The
87


Revolving Credit Facility may be borrowed, repaid, and reborrowed until the fourth anniversary of the Closing Date in February 2023, at which time all outstanding balances of the Revolving Credit Facility are due to be repaid.
The Company had outstanding letters of credit against the Revolving Credit Facility of $38.0 million and $30.8 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
The Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of its assets. In the future, certain ratios.of its direct and indirect subsidiaries may be required to guarantee the Credit Agreement. The first amendment further changedCompany may prepay, and in certain circumstances would be required to prepay, loans under the Credit Agreement without payment of a premium. The Credit Agreement contains customary representations and warranties, customary affirmative and negative covenants, a financial covenant that is tested quarterly and requires the Company to maintain a currentcertain adjusted quick ratio (calculated as current assets, divided by current liabilities less deferred revenue), greater than or equalof at least 1.00 to 1.1.

In June 2017, the Company entered into a second amendment to the Restated 2014 LSA. The advances under the second amendment carry a floating per annum interest rate equal to, at the Company’s option, (1) the prime rate or (2) LIBOR plus 2.75%, or the prime rate plus 1% depending on certain ratios. The extension further changed the financial covenant to maintain a current ratio (calculated as current assets, divided by current liabilities less deferred revenue) greater than or equal to 1.25. The revolving line1.00, and customary events of credit terminates on June 30, 2019 at which time the principal amount of all outstanding advances becomes due and payable. default.

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016,2021, the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants inof the amended Restated 2014 LSA.

The interest rate on the line of credit was 4.31% as of December 31, 2017 and 3.75% as of December 31, 2016. Credit Agreement.

11. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred Stock
The Company had $0 and $15.0 million outstanding under the line of credit as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company had $1.5 million and $0.9 million outstanding as letters of credit as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively


In June 2017, the Company entered into a subordinated loan agreement (“2017 Agreement”) with the Bank. The 2017 Agreement provides for a term loan borrowing of $40.0 million, with a minimum of $25.0 million to be initially drawn at the close of the agreement and the remaining amount available for a 24 month period, to be drawn in no less than $5.0 million increments. Advances under the term loan incur a facility fee equal to 1% of the drawn borrowings, in addition to interest payments at an interest rate equal to, at the Company’s option, (1) the prime rate plus 3.5% or (2) LIBOR plus 6.5%, subject to a 1% LIBOR floor. Additionally, the borrowings incur payment in kind interest fees equal to 2.5%, accruing to the unpaid borrowings balance, compounded monthly. Payment in kind interest may be settled in cash, at the Company’s election, during the term or at maturity. The Company is also obligated to pay final payment fees ranging from 1% to 4% depending on the timing of the payment. The 2017 Agreement terminates on October 9, 2020. On October 31, 2017 the Company repaid the entire amount outstanding, and subsequently terminated the 2017 Agreement. The Company recorded a loss of $2.3 million as a result of early extinguishment of debt.

In connection with the 2017 Agreement the Company issued 0.4 million warrants to purchase shares of Series H convertible preferred stock, with an exercise price of $9.17340. The warrants are exercisable up to ten years from the date of issuance. Upon the repayment of the amounts borrowed and the subsequent termination of the 2017 Agreement, the Company cancelled 0.1 million warrants to purchase Class B common stock that were contingent on future borrowings.

7. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Convertible Preferred Stock

As of December 31, 2016 convertible preferred stock consisted of the following:

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

Series

 

Price

 

 

Shares

Authorized

 

 

Shares

Outstanding

 

 

Liquidation

Preference

 

 

 

(in thousands, except price per share data)

 

A

 

$

0.36312

 

 

 

23,020

 

 

 

23,020

 

 

$

8,359

 

B

 

 

0.93808

 

 

 

6,396

 

 

 

6,396

 

 

 

6,000

 

C-1

 

 

0.54109

 

 

 

9,240

 

 

 

9,240

 

 

 

5,000

 

C-2

 

 

0.64931

 

 

 

8,950

 

 

 

7,700

 

 

 

5,000

 

D

 

 

2.37840

 

 

 

4,686

 

 

 

4,205

 

 

 

10,000

 

E

 

 

4.35679

 

 

 

11,161

 

 

 

11,075

 

 

 

48,250

 

F

 

 

5.43396

 

 

 

11,042

 

 

 

11,042

 

 

 

60,000

 

G

 

 

7.79730

 

 

 

3,206

 

 

 

3,206

 

 

 

25,000

 

H

 

 

9.17340

 

 

 

6,667

 

 

 

4,960

 

 

 

45,500

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

84,368

 

 

 

80,844

 

 

$

213,109

 

Upon the closing of the Company’s IPO, all outstanding shares of its convertible preferred stock automatically converted into 80.8 million shares of Class B common stock on a one-to-one basis.

On October 2, 2017, the Company filed an Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, which authorized the issuancehas 10 million shares of undesignated preferred stock authorized but not issued with rights and preferences determined by the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) at the time of issuance of such shares. As of December 31, 2017,2021 and 2020, there were no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding

outstanding.

Common Stock

The Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed on OctoberCompany has 2 2017, established two classes of authorized common stock, Class A common stock and Class B common stock. All shares of common stock outstanding immediately prior to the IPO, including shares of common stock issued upon the conversion of the convertible preferred stock, were converted into an equivalent number of shares of Class B common stock.


Holders of Class A common stock are entitled to one1 vote for each share of Class A common stock held on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders and holders of Class B common stock are entitled to ten10 votes for each share of Class B common stock held on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. Except with respect to voting, the rights of the holders of Class A and Class B common stock are identical. Shares of Class B common stock are voluntarily convertible into shares of Class A common stock at the option of the holder and are generally automatically converted into shares of the Company'sCompany’s Class A common stock upon sale or transfer. Shares issued in connection with exercises of stock options, vesting of restricted stock units, or shares purchased under the employee stock purchase plan are generally automatically converted into shares of the Company’s Class A common stock. Shares issued in connection

At-the-Market Offerings
On March 2, 2021, the Company entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement with an exerciseMorgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., and Evercore Group L.L.C., as its sales agents, pursuant to which the Company could offer and sell from time-to-time shares of theits Class A common stock warrants are convertedfor aggregate gross proceeds of up to $1,000.0 million. In March 2021, the Company sold approximately 2.6 million shares of Class A common stock at an average selling price of $379.26 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,000.0 million and incurred issuance costs of $10.4 million.
On May 13, 2020, the Company entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement with Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as its sales agents, pursuant to which the Company sold an aggregate of 4.0 million shares of the Company’s Class BA common stock.

stock at an average selling price of $126.01 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $504.0 million and incurred issuance costs of $6.8 million.

On November 19, 2019, the Company entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement with Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as its sales agent, pursuant to which the Company sold an aggregate of 1.0 million shares of the Company’s Class A common stock at an average selling price of $153.99 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $154.0 million and incurred issuance costs of $2.8 million.
On May 16, 2019, the Company entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement with Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, as its sales agent, pursuant to which the Company sold an aggregate of 1.0 million shares of the Company’s Class A common stock at an average selling price of $82.90 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $82.9 million and incurred issuance costs of $1.6 million.
On March 12, 2019, the Company entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement with Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as its sales agent, pursuant to which the Company sold approximately 1.4 million shares of the Company’s Class A common stock at an average selling price of $72.00 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $100.0 million and incurred issuance costs of $2.0 million.
88


Common Stock Reserved For Issuance

At December 31, 2017,2021, the Company had reserved shares ofCompany’s common stock reserved for issuance in the future is as follows:

follows (in thousands):

December 31,

2017

(in thousands)

As of December 31, 2021

Conversion of outstanding warrants

184

Common stock awards issuedgranted under equity

incentive plan

plans

26,608

9,460

Common stock awards available for grantissuance under

   equity incentive plan

the 2017 Employee Stock Purchase Plan *

12,202

5,089

Total

Common stock awards available for issuance under the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan

27,011
Total reserved shares of common stock

38,994

41,560

* The Company has not issued any common stock pursuant to the 2017 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
Equity Incentive Plans

The Company has 2 equity incentive plans, the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2008 Plan”) became effective in February 2008. The 2008 Plan allowed for the grant of incentive stock options to our employees and any of our subsidiary corporations’ employees and for the grant of non-statutory stock options and restricted stock awards to our employees, officers, directors and consultants. Options granted under the 2008 Plan were granted at a price per share equivalent to the fair market value on the date of grant. Recipients of option grants under the 2008 Plan who possess more than 10% of the combined voting power of the Company (a “10% Shareholder”) are subject to certain limitations, and incentive stock options granted to such recipients were at a price no less than 110% of the fair market value at the date of grant. Options under the 2008 Plan generally vest over four years and have a term of 10 years.

Upon the closing of the Company’s IPO, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”). No further shares would be issued under the 2008 Plan at the time the 2017 Plan became effective. The 2017 Plan became effective September 2017 in September 2017.connection with the Company’s initial public offering (“IPO”). No additional equity grants have been made pursuant to the 2008 Plan subsequent to the IPO. The 2017 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options to ourthe Company’s employees and for the grant of non-statutory stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, performance stock awards, performance cash awards, and other forms of equity compensation to ourthe Company’s employees, directors, and consultants. Options

Restricted stock units granted under the 2017 Plan are subject to continuous service. Stock options granted under the 2017 Plan generally vestare granted at a price per share equivalent to the fair market value on the date of grant. Recipients of option grants who possess more than 10% of the combined voting power of the Company are subject to certain limitations, and incentive stock options granted to such recipients are at a price no less than 110% of the fair market value at the date of grant.
Restricted Stock Units
Restricted stock unit activity for the year ended December 31, 2021 is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
 
Number of
Shares
 
Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair
Value Per Share
Balance, December 31, 20204,355$92.91 
Awarded983348.62 
Released(1,655)81.95 
Forfeited(397)135.44 
Balance, December 31, 2021 - Outstanding3,286$169.76 
The grant date fair value of restricted stock units granted during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019 was $342.6 million, $210.1 million, and $195.2 million, respectively.
The fair value of restricted stock units that vested during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019 was $135.6 million, $83.7 million, and $40.5 million, respectively.
The unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock units awarded to employees as of December 31, 2021 was $463.7 million, which the Company expects to recognize over four years and have a termweighted-average period of 10approximately 2.08 years.


89



Stock Options
The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activities under the 2008 Plan and 2017 Plan:

Plan (in thousands, except years and per share data):

 

Number of

Shares

 

 

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price

 

 

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Life (Years)

 

 

Weighted

Average

Grant Date

Fair Value

Per Share

 

 

Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value

 

 

(in thousands, except price per share data)

 

Number of
Shares
 
Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) 
Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

Balance, December 27, 2014 - outstanding

 

 

14,077

 

 

$

2.01

 

 

 

7.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2020Balance, December 31, 20208,733$26.19 5.7

Granted

 

 

7,203

 

 

 

5.82

 

 

 

 

 

$

2.58

 

 

 

 

 

Granted320356.55 — $139.76 

Exercised

 

 

(797

)

 

 

1.10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised(2,841)6.51 — 

Forfeited and expired

 

 

(633

)

 

 

3.88

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited and expired(38)104.47 — 

Balance, December 26, 2015

 

 

19,850

 

 

 

3.37

 

 

 

7.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

4,039

 

 

 

6.35

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.71

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(125

)

 

 

3.49

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited and expired

 

 

(1,429

)

 

 

4.54

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2016

 

 

22,335

 

 

 

3.66

 

 

 

6.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

6,083

 

 

 

7.88

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.73

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(963

)

 

 

2.54

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited and expired

 

 

(1,119

)

 

 

5.85

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2017 - outstanding

 

 

26,336

 

 

$

4.59

 

 

 

6.4

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,242,901

 

Balance, December 31, 2021 - OutstandingBalance, December 31, 2021 - Outstanding6,174$51.87 5.8$1,129,748 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options exercisable at December 31, 2017

 

 

15,311

 

 

$

3.00

 

 

 

4.6

 

 

 

 

 

$

746,939

 

Balance, December 31, 2021- ExercisableBalance, December 31, 2021- Exercisable4,548$14.73 4.9$973,186 

The totalweighted-average grant date fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019 was $139.76, $54.39, and $39.23, respectively.
The intrinsic value offor stock options exercised in the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021, 2020, and December 26, 20152019 was $20.4$997.6 million $0.4$470.8 million, and $3.9$474.2 million, respectively, andrespectively. Intrinsic value represents the difference between the fair valuevalues of the Company’s common stock at the dates of exercise and the stock options’ exercise price on the date of the options.

Early Exercise of Stock Options

The 2008 Plan allows employees to exercise options granted prior to vesting, if approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. The unvested shares are subject to the Company’s repurchase right at the original purchase price. The proceeds from the early exercise of stock options are initially recorded as an accrued liability and reclassified to stockholders’ equity as the Company’s repurchase right lapses. The number of unvested shares subject to repurchase that were outstanding asgrant.

As of December 31, 2017, 2016 and December 26, 2015 were not material.

2021, the Company had $67.5 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to unvested stock options that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.0 years.

Stock-based Compensation

The Company measures the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instrumentsaward based on the grant date fair value of the award. Generally, stock options granted to employees under the 2008 Plan vest 25% after one year and then 1/48th48th monthly thereafter, and restricted stock units issued generally vest 25% after one year and then 1/16th quarterly thereafter and have a term of ten years.

Restricted stock units generally vest over 4 years. For the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, the amount of stock-based compensation capitalized as part of internal-use software was not material.

The following table shows total stock-based compensation expense included in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021, 2020, and December 26, 2015:

2019 (in thousands):

 

Year Ended

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

December 26,

2015

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

(in thousands)

 

202120202019

Cost of player revenue

 

$

145

 

 

$

136

 

 

$

90

 

Cost of platform revenue

 

 

81

 

 

 

224

 

 

 

54

 

Cost of revenue, platformCost of revenue, platform$827 $847 $342 
Cost of revenue, playerCost of revenue, player2,035 1,407 1,072 

Research and development

 

 

4,714

 

 

 

2,766

 

 

 

1,685

 

Research and development77,770 58,412 40,036 

Sales and marketing

 

 

2,817

 

 

 

2,292

 

 

 

1,678

 

Sales and marketing63,503 42,846 24,179 

General and administrative

 

 

3,196

 

 

 

2,788

 

 

 

1,777

 

General and administrative43,397 30,564 19,546 

Total stock-based compensation

 

$

10,953

 

 

$

8,206

 

 

$

5,284

 

Total stock-based compensation$187,532 $134,076 $85,175 

90


The fair value of stock options granted under the 2008 Plan and 2017 Plan is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-valuation model. This valuation model for stock-based compensation expense requires the Company to make certain assumptions and judgments about the variables used in the calculation, including the expected term, the expected volatility of the Company’s common stock, an assumed risk-free interest rate, and expected dividends. In addition to these assumptions, the Company also estimated a forfeiture rate of unvested stock options to calculate the stock-based compensation expense prior to January 1, 2017. Beginning January 1, 2017, the Company began recognizing forfeitures as they occur with the adoption of the new guidance related to accounting for stock-based payment award transactions. The impact of the change was not material to the financial statements.

Fair Value of Common Stock

Prior to our IPO, the fair value of the common stock underlying our stock options was determined by our Board of Directors. The valuations of our common stock were determined in accordance with the guidelines outlined in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Practice Aid, Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation. Our Board of Directors, with input from management, exercised significant judgment and considered numerous objective and subjective factors to determine the fair value of our common stock at each grant date, including but not limited to the prices, rights, preferences and privileges of our preferred stock relative to the common stock,  our operating and financial performance, current business conditions and projections, our stage of development, likelihood of achieving a liquidity event for the shares of common stock underlying these stock options, such as an IPO or sale of our company, given prevailing market conditions, any adjustment necessary to recognize a lack of marketability of the common stock underlying the granted options, the market performance of comparable publicly-traded companies, the U.S. and global capital market conditions.

Subsequent to our IPO, we use the market closing price for our Class A common stock as reported on The NASDAQ Global Select Market on the date of grant. The Company uses the straight-line method for expense recognition.

Expected Term

The Company’s expected term represents the period that the Company’s stock-based awards are expected to be outstanding and is determined based on the simplified method as described in ASC Topic 718-10-S99-1, SEC Materials SAB Topic 14, Share-Based Payment.

Expected Volatility

The Company’s volatility factor is estimated using several comparable public company volatilities for similar option terms.


Expected Dividends

The Company has never paid cash dividends and has no present intention to pay cash dividends in the future, and as a result, the expected dividends are $0.

Risk-Free Interest Rate

The Company bases the risk-free interest rate on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero coupon issues with a remaining term equivalent to the estimated life of the stock-based awards. Where the expected term of the Company’s stock-based awards does not correspond with the term for which an interest rate is quoted, the Company performs a straight-line interpolation to determine the rate from the available term maturities.

The assumptions used to value stock-based awardsstock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021, 2020, and December 26, 20152019 are as follows:

Year Ended

December 31,

2017

December 31,

2016

December 26,

2015

Dividend rate

$

Expected term (in years)

5.3 - 6.5

5.3 - 6.5

6.1

Risk-free interest rate

1.87 - 2.25%

1.33 - 1.95%

1.39 - 1.90%

Expected volatility

39 - 44%

44 - 46%

43 - 46%

Fair value of common stock

$2.56 - $18.46

$5.64 - $6.60

$5.64 - $7.02

 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Expected term (in years)5.0 - 6.85.0 - 6.75.0 - 6.7
Risk-free interest rate0.36 - 1.20%0.22 - 1.67%1.35 - 2.56%
Expected volatility38 - 39%36 - 39%35 - 36%
Dividend rate

As of December 31, 2017, the Company had $32.3 million of unrecognized stock compensation expense related to unvested stock options that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.7 years.

Stock Option Repricing

In November 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a common stock option repricing program whereby previously granted and unexercised options held by current employees with exercise prices above $5.64 per share were repriced on a one-for-one basis to $5.64 per share which represented the fair value of the Company’s common stock as of the date of the repricing. There was no other modification to the vesting schedule of the previously issued option. As a result, 5.1 million unexercised options originally granted to purchase common stock at prices ranging from $5.70 to $7.02 per share were repriced under this program.

We treated the repricing as a modification of the original awards and calculated additional compensation costs for the difference between the fair value of the modified award and the fair value of the original award on the modification date. The repricing resulted in incremental stock-based compensation of $1.0 million. Expense related to vested shares of $0.1 million was expensed on the repricing date and the remaining $0.9 million related to unvested shares is being amortized over the remaining vesting period of such options.



Restricted Stock Units

Pursuant to the 2017 Plan, the Company issued restricted stock units to employees. Restricted stock unit activity for the year ended December 31, 2017 is as follows:

 

 

Shares

 

 

Weighted

Average

Grant Date

Fair Value

 

 

 

(in thousands, except price per share data)

 

Balance, December 31, 2016 - outstanding

 

 

 

 

$

 

Awarded

 

274

 

 

 

43.55

 

Released

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

 

(2

)

 

 

43.55

 

Balance, December 31, 2017 - outstanding

 

 

272

 

 

$

43.55

 

The grant-date fair value of restricted stock units granted during the year ended December 31, 2017 was $11.9 million. Total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock units awarded to employees was $11.6 million, which the Company expects to recognize over 3.9 years.

Common Stock Warrants

In July 2017 the Company issued 0.4 million shares of Class B common stock upon exercise of 0.4 million Class B common stock warrants issued in 2009.

Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants

Immediately prior to the IPO, outstanding convertible preferred stock warrants were as follows:

Series

 

Number

Outstanding

IPO closing

date

 

 

Number

Outstanding

December 31,

2016

 

 

Issuance

Date

 

Exercise

Price

 

 

Original

Term

 

 

(in thousands, except price per share data)

C-2

 

 

1,250

 

 

 

1,250

 

 

July 13, 2011

 

$

0.64931

 

 

10 years

D

 

 

250

 

 

 

250

 

 

October 17, 2011

 

 

2.37840

 

 

10 years

D

 

 

168

 

 

 

168

 

 

March 12, 2012

 

 

2.37840

 

 

10 years

D

 

 

63

 

 

 

63

 

 

April 27, 2012

 

 

2.37840

 

 

10 years

E

 

 

86

 

 

 

86

 

 

April 27, 2012

 

 

3.48546

 

 

10 years

H

 

 

409

 

 

 

 

 

June 9, 2017

 

 

9.17340

 

 

10 years

Total

 

 

2,226

 

 

 

1,817

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Upon the closing of the Company’s IPO, all outstanding convertible preferred stock warrants automatically converted to Class B common stock warrants.  As a result of the conversion, the Company revalued the convertible preferred stock warrants as of the completion of the IPO and reclassified the outstanding preferred stock warrant liability balance to additional paid-in capital with no further re-measurements as the Class B common stock warrants are now deemed permanent equity.

After the conversion, 1.9 million Class B common stock warrants were exercised and 0.1 million shares were cancelled during the year ended December 31, 2017. Since the contracts allowed for a net settlement for Class B common stock, the Company issued 1.8 million shares of Class B common stock upon exercise. As of December 31, 2017, 0.2 million Class B common stock warrants are outstanding.


Prior to the IPO, the Company valued convertible preferred stock warrants using the following assumptions in the Black-Scholes model:

Year Ended

December 31,

2016

December 26,

2015

Dividend rate

$

$

Expected term (in years)

3.2 - 3.9

3.3 - 3.8

Risk-free interest rate

0.7% - 1.6%

1.1% - 1.4%

Expected volatility

46.2% - 47.8%

42.0% - 46.9%

8.12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Commitments

The Company has operating lease agreements for office, research and development and sales and marketing space in the United States, the United Kingdom (“U.K.”), Denmark, and China, with expiration dates from May 2017 to February 2021.

Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and December 26, 2015 was $6.9 million, $4.6 million and $4.2 million, respectively. Future minimum lease payments under all operating leases as of December 31, 2017, are as follows:

Year Ending December 31,

 

Operating

Leases

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

2018

 

$

11,683

 

2019

 

 

11,764

 

2020

 

 

10,678

 

2021

 

 

1,112

 

2022

 

 

1,090

 

Thereafter

 

 

2,229

 

Less: Sublease rental income

 

 

(5,153

)

Total

 

$

33,403

 

The total approximate future minimum lease payments is primarily comprised of lease payments for two office locations. The first is for the Company’s headquarters facilities in Los Gatos, California, which expires in 2020 and has future operating lease obligations of $19.2 million. The second is for the Company’s prior headquarters facility in Saratoga, California, which expires in 2020 and has future operating lease obligations of $7.5 million.

In connection with its leased facilities the Company recognized a liability for asset retirement obligations in 2015 representing the present value of estimated costs to be incurred at lease expiration. The liability for asset retirement obligations was $0.5 million and $0.3 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Manufacturing Purchase Commitments

The Company has various manufacturing contracts with vendors in the conduct of the normal course of its business. One major vendor has contracts thatIn order to manage future demand for its products, the Company enters into agreements with manufacturers and suppliers to procure inventory based upon certain criteria and timing. Some of these commitments are noncancelable or have varying provisions regarding cancellation.non-cancelable. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016,2021, the Company had $75.2$195.2 million and $64.3 millionof non-cancelable purchase commitments for inventory, respectively.

inventory.

The Company records a liability for noncancelablenon-cancelable purchase commitments in excess of its futureprojected demand forecasts. The Company recorded $0.6$0.2 million and $2.0$1.2 million for these purchase commitments in “Accrued liabilities” atAccrued liabilities as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively.


Licensed Content License Purchase Commitments

The Company licenses certain content for users to access through The Roku Channel. An obligation for licensing of content is incurred at the time the Company enters into contracts with content publishers to license content for streaming. When a title becomes available, the Company records an agreement to obtain future titlesasset and a liability on the costconsolidated balance sheets.
As of December 31, 2021, the Company’s total obligation for licensed content is $421.0 million, of which the Company recorded $92.1 million in Current liabilities and $51.2 million in Other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The remaining $277.7 million is not yet recognized on the consolidated balance sheets as the content is known. Certain agreements include the obligation to license rights for unknown future titles, the ultimate quantity and/or fees for which aredoes not yet determinable as of the reporting date. At December 31, 2017, the amount recorded as obligations in “Accrued liabilities” for license purchase commitments were not material. At December 31, 2017, the Company had $1.1 million of obligations that are not reflected on the financial statements as they do not yet meet the criteria for asset recognition.
The expected timing of payments for these content obligations are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ending December 31,
2022$212,355 
202399,848
202459,544
202536,731
20268,715
Thereafter3,815
Total content liabilities$421,008 
The Company also licenses content under arrangements where the payments are variable and based on the revenue earned by the Company. Since those amounts cannot be determined as of December 31, 2021, they are not included in the obligations above.
In connection with the acquisition of certain content rights during the quarter ended March 31, 2021, the Company assumed liabilities related to certain costs of the development and use of certain assets that had been incurred but not paid at the time assumed. Escrow arrangements were put in place such that selling shareholders would cover such costs. Accordingly, the Company recognized both an indemnification asset and liability recognition.

Loss from Exit of Facilities

In January 2016,$81.4 million, respectively, as of March 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2021, $77.5 million of both the Company moved its headquarters facilitiesindemnification asset and liability were released related to Los Gatos, California from Saratoga, California. The Company has entered into subleasespayments made for a portion of the former headquarters and expects to sublease theliabilities assumed. The remaining portion for the remainderindemnification balance as of the lease period. In connectionDecember 31, 2021 is $3.9 million, with the move,indemnification asset recorded as part of Prepaid expenses and other current assets and the Company recognized a facilities exit charge for the estimated loss on the sublease in its “Operating Expenses”. The estimated loss is comprisedindemnification liability recorded as part of the remaining fair value of lease obligations and related expenses for exited locations, as determined at the cease-use dates of those facilities, net of estimated sublease income that could be reasonably obtainedAccrued liabilities in the future, and will be paid out over the remaining lease terms, which end in the year ending December 31, 2020. Projected sublease income is based on management’s estimates, which are subject to change.

A summary of the Company’s exit liability activity for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, is as follows:

consolidated balance sheets.

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Beginning balance

 

$

2,085

 

 

$

-

 

Change in estimated loss from exit

 

 

525

 

 

 

3,804

 

Non-cash adjustment

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,120

 

Amortization of liability

 

 

(1,831

)

 

 

(2,839

)

Ending balance

 

$

779

 

 

$

2,085

 

91

The Company recorded $0.7 million of the above lease liability in “Accrued liabilities” and the remaining $0.1 million in “Other long-term liabilities” at December 31, 2017.



Letters of Credit

As of December 31, 20172021 and 2020, the Company had irrevocable letters of credit outstanding in the amount of $1.5$38.0 million for the benefit of a landlordand $30.9 million, respectively, related to noncancelable facilities leases. The letters of credit expire onhave various expiration dates in 2018.

through 2030.

Contingencies

The Company mayaccrues for loss contingencies, including liabilities for intellectual property licensing claims, when it believes such losses are probable and reasonably estimable. These contingencies are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impact of negotiations, estimated settlements, legal rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events. The resolution of these contingencies and of other legal proceedings can be, involved in disputes or litigation matters that arisehowever, inherently unpredictable and subject to significant uncertainties.
From time to time, the Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims, and investigations in the ordinary course of business. Managementbusiness, including claims relating to employee relations, business practices, and patent infringement. The Company is involved in litigation matters not awarelisted herein. Although the results of these proceedings, claims, and investigations cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company does not believe that the final outcome of any disputematters that it believes wouldis currently involved in are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on its business, operatingfinancial condition, or results cash flows or financial condition.

of operations. During the year ended December 31, 2021 the Company recorded expenses of $4.8 million in Cost of revenue, player, $1.8 million in Cost of revenue, platform, and $3.4 million in General and administrative expenses for claims related to patent infringement. During the year ended December 31, 2020 the Company did not have any loss contingencies that were material. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded expenses of $9.9 million, in Cost of revenue, player for various claims related to patent infringements.

Indemnification

Many

In the ordinary course of business, the Company has entered into contractual arrangements which provide indemnification provisions of varying scope and terms to business partners and other parties with respect to certain matters, including, but not limited to, losses arising out of the Company’s breach of such agreements include certain provisions for indemnifying content publishers, licensees, contract manufacturer and suppliers if the Company’s products or services infringe a third party’sout of intellectual property rights. infringement claims made by third parties. The Company’s obligations under these agreements may be limited in terms of time or amount, and in some instances, the Company may have recourse against third parties for certain payments. In addition, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and certain of its officers that will require it, among other things, to indemnify them against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or officers.
It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount under these indemnification obligations due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each agreement. To date, the Company has not incurred any material costs as a result of such obligations and have not accrued any liabilities related to such obligations in the consolidated financial statements.


Player Warranties

Upon issuance of a standard player warranty, the Company recognizes a liability for the obligation it assumes under the warranty. As of December 31, 2017, 2016 and December 26, 2015 the accrued warranty reserve was immaterial.

The Company’s standard player warranty period ranges from 12 to 24 months from the date of player activation. Upon shipment of player to its customers, the Company estimates expenses for the cost to replace products that may be returned under warranty and accrues a liability in cost of player revenue for this amount. The determination of the Company’s warranty requirements is based on historical experience. The Company estimates and adjusts these accruals at each balance sheet date for changes in these factors.

The Company offered customers separately priced optional-extended warranties through 2016. The Company defers and amortizes revenue associated with the sales of the extended warranties over the warranty period. As of December 31, 2017, 2016 and December 26, 2015, the extended warranty deferred revenue was immaterial.

9.

13. INCOME TAXES

The components of lossincome (loss) before income taxes consist of the following:

following (in thousands):

 

Year Ended

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

December 26,

2015

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

(in thousands)

 

202120202019

United States

 

$

(63,831

)

 

$

(42,977

)

 

$

(41,696

)

United States$240,560 $(21,107)$(63,453)

Foreign

 

 

637

 

 

 

430

 

 

 

1,232

 

Foreign(3,973)2,655 2,534 

Net loss before income taxes

 

$

(63,194

)

 

$

(42,547

)

 

$

(40,464

)

Net income (loss) before income taxesNet income (loss) before income taxes$236,587 $(18,452)$(60,919)

92


The income tax (benefit) expense consisted of the following:

following (in thousands):

 

Year Ended

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

December 26,

2015

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

(in thousands)

 

202120202019

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current:

Federal

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Federal$— $(219)$(47)

State

 

 

89

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

71

 

State589 620 244 

Foreign

 

 

674

 

 

 

160

 

 

 

76

 

Foreign490 743 108 

 

 

763

 

 

 

210

 

 

 

147

 

1,079 1,144 305 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred:

Federal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal193 — — 

State

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

State256 — — 

Foreign

 

 

(448

)

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

Foreign(7,326)(2,089)(1,287)
(6,877)(2,089)(1,287)

Total

 

$

315

 

 

$

211

 

 

$

147

 

Total$(5,798)$(945)$(982)


The following is a reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the Company’s effective tax rate:

 

Year Ended

 

Years Ended December 31,

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

December 26,

2015

 

202120202019

U.S. federal income tax at statutory rate

 

 

34.0

%

 

 

34.0

%

 

 

34.0

%

U.S. federal income tax at statutory rate21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %

U.S. state and local income taxes

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(0.2

)

U.S. state and local income taxes0.2 (3.2)(0.4)

Change in valuation allowance

 

 

19.0

 

 

 

(36.9

)

 

 

(33.7

)

Change in valuation allowance140.0 (698.4)(213.4)

Federal research and development tax credit

 

 

5.2

 

 

 

4.8

 

 

 

3.9

 

Federal research and development tax credit(30.7)102.9 30.8 

Convertible preferred stock warrants

 

 

(21.7

)

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

(1.5

)

Stock-based compensation

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

(2.5

)

 

 

(1.7

)

Stock-based compensation(114.3)577.8 158.0 

Permanent items

 

 

(1.1

)

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

(1.1

)

Discrete tax benefit due to IP transferDiscrete tax benefit due to IP transfer(19.1)— — 
Meals and entertainmentMeals and entertainment0.1 (1.6)(1.4)

Foreign rate differential

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.4

 

Foreign rate differential0.1 — (0.6)
Acquisition costsAcquisition costs— — (1.3)
Section 162(m) limitationSection 162(m) limitation1.1 (7.2)(1.4)
State apportionment changeState apportionment change— 4.4 1.3 

Tax rate change

 

 

(36.4

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax rate change(0.7)— (0.4)
Provision to return true-upProvision to return true-up(0.1)9.4 9.9 

Other

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

(0.5

)

Other(0.1)0.1 (0.5)

Effective tax rate

 

 

(0.5

)%

 

 

(0.4

)%

 

 

(0.4

)%

Effective tax rate(2.5)%5.2 %1.6 %

93


Significant components of the Company’s deferred income tax assets and liabilities consist of the following:

following (in thousands):

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

As of December 31,

 

(in thousands)

 

20212020

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax assets:

Net operating loss carryforwards

 

$

34,843

 

 

$

46,954

 

Net operating loss carryforwards$563,173 $379,613 

Reserves and accruals

 

 

13,577

 

 

 

15,575

 

Reserves and accruals20,969 14,131 

Research and development credits

 

 

15,475

 

 

 

10,555

 

Research and development credits166,940 104,110 
Operating lease liabilitiesOperating lease liabilities107,228 91,373 
Stock-based compensationStock-based compensation36,350 28,318 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

288

 

 

 

1,568

 

Depreciation and amortization40,583 — 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

4,098

 

 

 

4,068

 

Total deferred tax assets

 

 

68,281

 

 

 

78,720

 

Total deferred tax assets935,243 617,545 
Deferred tax liabilities:Deferred tax liabilities:
Operating lease right-of-use assetsOperating lease right-of-use assets(85,713)(70,755)
Depreciation and amortizationDepreciation and amortization— (11,707)
Total deferred tax liabilitiesTotal deferred tax liabilities(85,713)(82,462)

Valuation allowance

 

 

(68,219

)

 

 

(78,695

)

Valuation allowance(838,949)(530,887)

Net deferred tax assets

 

$

62

 

 

$

25

 

Net deferred tax assets$10,581 $4,196 

A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized through future operations. As a result of the Company’s analysis of all available objective evidence, both positive and negative, as of December 31, 2017,2021, management believes it is more likely than not that the U.S. and Netherlands deferred tax assets will not be fully realizable. Accordingly, the Company has provided a full valuation allowance against its U.S. and Netherlands deferred tax assets.
The Company’s U.S. federal and state valuation allowance increased by $261.8 million and $169.7 million during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, primarily due to U.S. federal and state tax losses and credits incurred during the period.
The change in the valuation allowance, during the year ended December 31, 2021, is primarily attributable to an increase in domestic net operating loss carryforwards, primarily due to stock-based compensation expense, and an increase of approximately $46.2 million in deferred tax assets with the exception of deferred tax assetsthat are not realizable, related to the IP transfer completed during 2021, giving rise to foreign entities in the U.K., China and Denmark.

amortizable assets.

For federal and state income tax reporting purposes, respective net operating loss carryforwards of $135.2$2,169.9 million and $104.1$1,824.3 million are available to reduce future taxable income, if any. These net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2028 for federal and certain state net operating losses have expired in 2021. The federal net operating loss generated subsequent to 2017 can be carried forward indefinitely.
For Brazil, Denmark, Netherlands, and U.K. income tax purposes.

Duringreporting purposes, the net operating loss carryforwards of $2.8 million, $2.8 million, $6.1 million, and $33.9 million, respectively, are available to reduce future taxable income, if any, in those countries. Brazil, Denmark, and U.K. net operating losses can be carried forward indefinitely. Netherlands net operating losses can be carried back one year ended December 31, 2017 theand carried forward indefinitely. The Company adopted the requirementsalso has U.K. research and development tax credit carryforwards of ASU 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share -Based Payment Accounting, issued by the FASB that simplifies the accounting for certain aspects of stock-based payments to employees. As a result of adoption, the previously unrecognized U.S. excess tax benefits of $1.3$0.5 million, were recorded as a deferred tax asset, which was fully offset by a valuation allowance resulting in no impact to the accumulated deficit.

can be carried forward indefinitely.

As of December 31, 2017,2021, the Company has research and development tax credit carryforwards of $13.4$133.8 million and $9.1$97.4 million for federal and state income tax purposes, respectively. If not utilized, the federal and state carryforwards will begin to expire in 2028. The state tax credits can be carried forward indefinitely.

2028 and 2035, respectively.

The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), contains provisions that may limit the net operating loss and credit carryforwards available for use in any given period upon the occurrence of certain events, including a statutorily defined significant change in ownership. Utilization of the net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards is subject to an annual limitation due to an ownership change, as defined by section 382 of the Code. The Company completed a recent study to assess whether any section 382 ownership change has occurred since the Company’s

94


formation. Based on the study, the Company had a section 382 ownership change on December 18, 2009 and tax attributes generated by the Company through the ownership change date are subject to the limitation. The
A section 382 study was completed for dataxu, which the Company has determined that there is no additionalacquired in November 2019, covering the period from inception beginning May 1, 2008 through the acquisition date of November 8, 2019. Based on the study, the Company identified 4 ownership changes for section 382 purposes. As such, tax attributes generated by dataxu through the ownership change since December 18, 2009.

dates are subject to the limitation.

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 20172021 is $5.8$66.2 million, of which $48.7 million is fully composed of research and development credits.credits and $17.5 million is related to international activities. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

follows (in thousands):

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year

 

$

4,368

 

 

$

2,917

 

Gross increase for tax positions of current years

 

 

1,475

 

 

 

1,246

 

Gross increase for tax positions of prior year

 

 

 

 

 

205

 

Gross decrease for tax positions of prior years

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrecognized tax benefits balance at end of year

 

$

5,843

 

 

$

4,368

 

 As of December 31,
 20212020
Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year$29,175 $19,487 
Gross increase for tax positions of current year36,198 9,959 
Gross decrease due to statute expiration(330)(75)
Gross increase (decrease) for tax positions of prior years1,107 (196)
Unrecognized tax benefits balance at end of year$66,150 $29,175 

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of its income tax expense. As of December 31, 2017, there were no2021, the Company recorded $0.4 million of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions.

None of

Change in the Company’s unrecognized tax benefit,benefits, if recognized,any, would affecthave an immaterial impact on its effective tax rate. The Company does not believe that the amount ofexpect its gross unrecognized tax benefits willto change significantly inwithin the next 12 months.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. InThe Company is currently under examination by the normal course of business, the Company isTexas Comptroller for calendar tax years 2015, 2016, and 2017. All tax years remain subject to examination by taxingfederal and state authorities. These audits include questioning the timing and amount of deductions; the nexus of income among various tax jurisdictions; and compliance with federal, state, and local tax laws.
The Company iswill continue to indefinitely reinvest earnings from its foreign subsidiaries, which are not currently under audit by the Internal Revenue Service or other similar state and local authorities. Allsignificant. While federal income tax years remain open to examination by major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject.

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred toexpense has been recognized as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Tax Act").  The Tax Act reduces the US federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, imposes a one-time repatriation tax, and numerous other provisions transitioning to a territorial system.

The SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”), which provides guidance on accounting for the tax effects of the Tax Act. SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the Tax Act enactment date for companies to complete the accounting under ASC 740. In accordance with SAB 118, a company must reflect the income tax effects of those aspects of the Act for which the accounting under ASC 740 is complete. To the extent that a company’s accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act is incomplete but it is able to determine a reasonable estimate, it must record a provisional estimate in the financial statements. If a company cannot determine a provisional estimate to be included in the financial statements, it should continue to apply ASC 740 on the basis of the provisions of the tax laws that were in effect immediately before the enactment of the Tax Act.

Based on provisions of the Tax Act, the Company remeasured the deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future, which is generally 21%. The estimated amount of the re-measurement of our deferred tax balance was $23.0 million. However, as the Company recognizes a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized in future years there is no impact to effective tax rate, as any change to deferred taxes would be offset by valuation allowances.


The one-time repatriation tax is based on the Company's post-1986 earnings and profits (E&P) that were previously deferred from US income taxes.  The one-time repatriation tax did not result in additional tax liability for the Company as the Company has sufficient net operating loss to offset the estimated foreign earnings.

As a result of the one-time repatriation tax,2017, the Company has not provided for any foreign withholding tax for any undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017.  The Company has not yet made a determination of indefinite reinvestment assertion in light of the Tax Act and considers the conclusion to be incomplete under guidance issued by the SEC. The Company expects to reach a final determination within the measurement period in accordance with SAB 118.

The changes included in the Tax Act are broad and complex. The final transition impacts of the Tax Act may differ from the above estimate, possibly materially, due to, among other things, changes in interpretations of the Tax Act, any legislative action to address questions that arise because of the Tax Act, any changes in accounting standards for income taxes or related interpretations in response to the Tax Act, or any updates or changes to estimates the Company has utilized to calculate the transition impacts, including impacts from changes to current year earnings estimates and foreign exchange rates of foreign subsidiaries. The Securities and Exchange Commission has issued rules that would allow for a measurement period of up to one year after the enactment date of the Tax Act to finalize the recording of the related tax impacts. The Company currently anticipates finalizing and recording any resulting adjustments by the year ending December 31, 2018.

The Act creates a new requirement that global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) earned by controlled foreign corporations (CFCs) must be included currently in the gross income of the CFCs’ U.S. shareholder. Because of the complexity of the new GILTI tax rules, we are continuing to evaluate this provision of the Act and the application of ASC 740. Under U.S. GAAP, we are allowed to make an accounting policy choice of either (1) treating taxes due on future U.S. inclusions in taxable income related to GILTI as a current-period expense when incurred (the “period cost method”) or (2) factoring such amounts into a company’s measurement of itsadditional deferred taxes (the “deferred method”). Our selection of an accounting policy with respect to items such as foreign withholding taxes, state income tax or foreign exchange gain or loss. It is not practicable for the new GILTI tax rules will depend, in part, on analyzing our global incomeCompany to determine whether we expect to have future U.S. inclusions in taxable income related to GILTI and, if so, what the impact is expected to be. We have not yet made any adjustments related to potential GILTIamount of unrecognized tax in our financial statements and have not made a policy decision regarding whether to record deferred taxesexpense on GILTI.

10.these reinvested international earnings.

14. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company has agreements with one of the Company’s strategic investors. Indid not engage in any material related party transactions for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021 and 2020.
In the year ended December 26, 201531, 2019, the Company engaged in transactions with one of its strategic investors. With respect to this investor, the Company recorded $0.6 million, $0.7revenue of $8.5 million and $0.5expenses of $1.3 million of revenue from salesfor the year ended December 31, 2019. During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company did not consider this investor to be a related party, as this investor. Theinvestor did not meet the defined criteria.
In the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company had receivable balancesengaged in transactions with another company in which the Company’s Chief Executive Officer held a majority voting interest and was a member of $0.5 millionsuch company’s board of directors at that time, and $0.1 million related to these sales at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

In addition, aanother member of the Company’s Board of Directors is a senior vice president at an operating unit of one of the strategic investors. The Company recorded expenses of $0.4 million in operating expenses frompresently such company’s Chief Executive Officer. With respect to transactions with this investorcompany, the Company incurred expenses of $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. There were no transactions with this investor for the year ended December 31, 2016.

11.2019.

15. RETIREMENT PLANS

The Company maintains a 401(k) tax deferred saving plan (the “Savings Plan”) for the benefit of qualified employees. Qualified employees may elect to make contributions to the Savings Plan on a biweekly basis, subject to certain
95


limitations. The Company may make contributions to the Savings Plan at the discretion of the Board of Directors. No contributions were made for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021, 2020, and December 26, 2015.

2019.

In 2014, the Company established a defined contribution plan in the U.K. for its U.K.-based employees. The Company contributed $0.3$1.3 million, $0.2$0.7 million, and $0.2$0.5 million to the plan for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and December 26, 2015,2019, respectively.


12.

16. NET LOSSINCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

The Company calculates its basic and diluted net loss per share allocable to common stockholders in conformity with the two-class method required for companies with participating securities. In computing diluted net loss allocable to common stockholders, undistributed earnings are re-allocated to reflect the potential impact of dilutive securities.

The Company’s basic net lossincome (loss) per share allocable to common stockholders is calculated by dividing the net loss allocable to common stockholdersincome (loss) by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. The Company uses the two-class method to calculate net income (loss) per share. Except with respect to certain voting, conversion, and transfer rights and as otherwise expressly provided in the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation or required by applicable law, shares of the Company’s Class A common stock and Class B common stock have the same rights and privileges and rank equally, share ratably, and are identical in all respects as to all matters. Accordingly, basic and diluted net income (loss) per share are the same for both classes.
For purposes of the calculation of diluted net lossincome (loss) per share, allocableoptions to purchase common stockholders, convertible preferred stock, restricted stock units, and unvested shares of common stock issued upon the early exercise of stock options convertible preferred stock warrants, options to purchase common stock and common stock warrants are considered common stock equivalents but have beenequivalents. Dilutive shares of common stock are determined by applying the treasury stock method. The dilutive shares are excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share allocable to common stockholdersin the period of net loss, as their effect is antidilutive.

Basic and diluted net loss per share of common stock allocable to common stockholders is calculated by dividing the net loss allocable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, less shares subject to repurchase, and excludes any dilutive effects of employee stock-based awards and warrants. Because the Company has reported a net loss for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and December 26, 2015, diluted net loss per common share is the same as the basic net loss per share for those years.

The Company considers all series of its convertible preferred stock to be participating securities as they are entitled to receive noncumulative dividends prior and in preference to any dividends on shares of common stock. Due to the Company’s net losses, there is no impact on the loss per share calculation in applying the two-class method since the participating securities have no legal obligation to share in any losses.

Thefollowing table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net lossincome (loss) per share as follows:

follows (in thousands, except per share data):

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

December 26,

2015

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss allocable to common stockholders

 

$

(63,509

)

 

$

(42,758

)

 

$

(40,611

)

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average shares used in computing

   net loss per share, basic and diluted

 

 

28,308

 

 

 

4,746

 

 

 

4,030

 

Net loss per share, basic and diluted

 

$

(2.24

)

 

$

(9.01

)

 

$

(10.08

)

Years Ended December 31,
202120202019
Numerator:
Net income (loss)$242,385 $(17,507)$(59,937)
Denominator:
Basic net income (loss) per share:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding — basic132,710123,978115,218
Net income (loss) per share — basic$1.83 $(0.14)$(0.52)
Diluted net income (loss) per share:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding — basic132,710123,978115,218
Effect of potentially dilutive securities:
Restricted stock units2,744
Stock options6,214
Weighted-average common shares outstanding — diluted141,668123,978115,218
Net income (loss) per share — diluted$1.71 $(0.14)$(0.52)

The potential common shares that were

Common stock equivalents excluded from the calculation of diluted net lossincome (loss) per share because of their anti-dilutive effect would have been antidilutive for the periods presented are as follows:

follows (in thousands):

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

December 26,

2015

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Equity awards to purchase common stock

 

 

26,608

 

 

 

22,335

 

 

 

19,850

 

Unvested shares of common stock issued upon

   early exercise of stock options

 

 

57

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

12

 

Warrants to purchase common stock

 

 

184

 

 

 

375

 

 

 

542

 

Warrants to purchase convertible preferred stock

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,817

 

 

 

1,817

 

Convertible preferred stock

 

 

-

 

 

 

80,844

 

 

 

80,844

 

Total

 

 

26,849

 

 

 

105,374

 

 

 

103,065

 

 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Equity awards to purchase common stock1,12813,08815,668
Unvested shares of common stock issued upon early exercise of stock options and business acquisition131
Total1,12813,08915,699


96

13.



17. SEGMENT INFORMATION

An operating segment is defined as a component of an entity for which discrete financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. The Company’s CODM is its Chief Executive Officer, and the CODM evaluates performance and makes decisions about allocating resources to its operating segments based on financial information presented on a consolidated basis and on revenue and gross profit for each operating segment. The Company uses the management approach to determine the segment financial information that should be disaggregated and presented separately in the Company’s notes to its consolidated financial statements. The management approach is based on the manner by which management has organized the segments within the Company for making operating decisions, allocating resources, and assessing performance.

The Company reports its financial results consistent with the manner in which financial information is viewed by management for decision-making purposes. The Company does not manage operating expenses such as research and development, sales and marketing and general and administrative expenses at the segment level.

The Company’s CODM is its Chief Executive Officer, and the CODM evaluates performance and makes decisions about allocating resources to its operating segments based on financial information presented on a consolidated basis and on revenue and gross profit for each operating segment. In the second quarter of 2017 the Company changed the operating segments to combine one of the previous operating segments with two existing segments to reflect how the CODM evaluates performance and allocates resources. This change did not result in a change to the reportable segments.

The Company is organized into two reportable segments as follows:

Player

Consists primarily of net sales of streaming media players and accessories through retailers and distributors, as well as directly to customers through the Company’s website.

Platform

Consists primarily of fees received from advertisers and content publishers, and from licensing the Company’s technology and proprietary operating system with TV brands and service operators. Platform revenue primarily includes fees earned from the sale of digital advertising and revenue share from new or recurring user subscriptions activated through the Company’s platform and revenue share from user purchases of content publishers’ media through its platform. The Company also earns revenue from the sale of branded channel buttons on player and TV remote controls.

The Company does not allocate property and equipment or any other assets or capital expenditures to reportable segments. Operating expenses are not managed at the segment level.

The Company evaluates the performance of itsis organized into 2 reportable segments basedas follows:
Platform
Consists of revenue generated from the sale of digital advertising and related services including the demand-side platform, content distribution services (such as subscription and transaction revenue shares, media and entertainment promotional spending, the sale of Premium Subscriptions, and the sale of branded channel buttons on remote controls), and licensing arrangements with service operators and TV brands.
Player
Consists of revenue generated from sale of streaming players, audio products and accessories through retailers and distributors, as well as directly to customers through the financial measures, including segment gross profit, which are regularly reviewed by the CODM and provide insight into the individual segments and their ability to contribute to Company’s operating results.

website.

Customers accounting for 10% or more of segment revenue, net, were as follows:

 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Platform segment revenue
Customer H10 %13 %*
Player segment revenue
Customer A*10 %16 %
Customer B23 %18 %17 %
Customer C37 %40 %39 %

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

December 26,

2015

 

Player segment revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer A

 

 

15

%

 

 

18

%

 

 

19

%

Customer B

 

 

12

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

12

 

Customer C

 

 

34

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Platform segment revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer B

 

* %

 

 

 

15

%

 

 

31

%

Customer F

 

*

 

 

*

 

 

 

11

 

Customer E

 

 

13

%

 

 

10

 

 

*

 

*     Less than 10%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* Less than 10%

Revenue in international markets was less than 10% in each of the periods presented. Substantially all Company assets were held in the United States and were attributable to the operations in the United States as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016.

14. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (Unaudited)

The following table summarizes the Company’s information on total revenue, gross profit, net income (loss) and earnings per share by quarter for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. This data was derived from the Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements.

2020.

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

Dec 31,

2017

 

 

Sep 30,

2017

 

 

Jun 30,

2017

 

 

Mar 31,

2017

 

 

Dec 31,

2016

 

 

Oct 1,

2016

 

 

Jul 2,

2016

 

 

Apr 2,

2016

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

Total Revenue

 

$

188,261

 

 

$

124,782

 

 

$

99,627

 

 

$

100,093

 

 

$

147,340

 

 

$

89,053

 

 

$

83,809

 

 

$

78,447

 

Gross Profit

 

 

73,461

 

 

 

49,895

 

 

 

37,637

 

 

 

38,840

 

 

 

44,663

 

 

 

26,050

 

 

 

25,076

 

 

 

25,256

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

6,941

 

 

 

(46,235

)

 

 

(15,513

)

 

 

(8,702

)

 

 

3,227

 

 

 

(12,743

)

 

 

(14,109

)

 

 

(19,133

)

Net income attributable to participating securities

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

3,227

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders

 

 

6,941

 

 

 

(46,235

)

 

 

(15,513

)

 

 

(8,702

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(12,743

)

 

 

(14,109

)

 

 

(19,133

)

Basic net income (loss) per share

   attributable to common stockholders

 

 

0.07

 

 

 

(8.79

)

 

 

(3.18

)

 

 

(1.79

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(2.66

)

 

 

(2.98

)

 

 

(4.10

)

Diluted net income (loss) per share

   attributable to common stockholders

 

 

0.06

 

 

 

(8.79

)

 

 

(3.18

)

 

 

(1.79

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(2.66

)

 

 

(2.98

)

 

 

(4.10

)

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements Withwith Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.


Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act) prior to the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the
97


period covered by this Annual Report, on Form 10-K, our disclosure controls and procedures were, in design and operation, effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 20172021 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include a report of management’s assessment regarding

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting or(as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an attestation reportevaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework set forth in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Our assessment excluded internal controls over financial reporting of This Old House and Nielsen AVA businesses which were acquired during the year and whose total assets represent 1.7% and total revenue represent 0.7% of our consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021. Based on our evaluation under the framework set forth in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013), our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2021.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, dueas stated in its report which is included below.
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to a transition periodtheir costs. Our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal controls over financial reporting have been designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Roku, Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Roku, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021, of the Company and our report dated February 18, 2022, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
As described in “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting”, management excluded from its assessment the internal control over financial reporting at the This Old House and Nielsen AVA businesses which were acquired during the year and whose financial statements constitute 1.7% of total assets and 0.7% of total revenue of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021.Accordingly, our audit did not include the assessment of internal controls over financial reporting for the This Old House and Nielsen AVA businesses.
98


Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for newly public companies.

Attestation Reportand the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

This Annual ReportPCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on Form 10-K does not include an attestation reportthe assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of our registered publicInternal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting firm dueprinciples. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to an exemption established by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, or JOBS Act, for “emerging growth companies.” due to a transition period established bymaintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the rulestransactions and dispositions of the Securitiesassets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and Exchange Commission for newly public companies.

that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
San Jose, California
February 18, 2022

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
None.
99


PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for the 20182022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of our year ended December 31, 2017.

2021.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for the 20182022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of our year ended December 31, 2017.

2021.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for the 20182022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of our year ended December 31, 2017.

2021.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and RelatedRelated Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for the 20182022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of our year ended December 31, 2017.

2021.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for the 20182022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of our year ended December 31, 2017.

2021.

100


PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1) Financial Statements

See Index to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report.

(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedule

All financial statement schedules have been omitted as the information is not required under the related instructions or is not applicable or because the information required is already included in the financial statements or the notes to those financial statements.

(a)(3) Exhibits

The documents set forth below are filed herewith or incorporated herein by reference to the location indicated.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Number

Exhibit Title

Form

File No.

Exhibit

Filing

Date

Filed

Herewith

3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation

8-K

001-38211

3.1

10/3/2017

 

3.2

Amended and Restated Bylaws

S-1/A

333-220318

3.4

9/18/2017

 

4.1

Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement, by and among Roku, Inc. and the investors listed on Exhibit A thereto, dated November  9, 2015.

S-1

333-220318

10.1

9/1/2017

 

4.2

Amendment to the Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement, dated March 6, 2017.

S-1

333-220318

10.2

9/1/2017

 

10.1 +

Roku, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan.

S-1

333-220318

10.3

9/1/2017

 

10.2 +

Forms of Option Agreement and Option Grant Notice under 2008 Equity Incentive Plan.

S-1

333-220318

10.4

9/1/2017

 

10.3 +

Roku, Inc. 2017 Equity Incentive Plan.

S-1/A

333-220318

10.5

9/18/2017

 

10.4 +

Forms of Option Agreement and Option Grant Notice under 2017 Equity Incentive Plan.

S-1/A

333-220318

10.6

9/18/2017

 

10.5 +

Forms of Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice and Award Agreement under 2017 Equity Incentive Plan.

S-1/A

333-220318

10.7

9/18/2017

 

10.6 +

Roku, Inc. 2017 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

S-1/A

333-220318

10.8

9/18/2017

 

10.7 +

Warrant to Purchase Stock, by and between Roku, Inc. and Pearl Street Technology Finance I Onshore LP, dated June 9, 2017.

S-1

333-220318

10.22

9/1/2017

 

10.8 +

Warrant to Purchase Stock, by and between Roku, Inc. and Westriver Mezzanine Loans—Loan Pool V, LLC, dated June 9, 2017.

S-1

333-220318

10.24

9/1/2017

 

10.9 +

Form of Indemnification Agreement, by and between Roku, Inc. and each of its directors and executive officers.

S-1A

333-220318

10.9

9/18/2017

 

10.10 +

Employment Terms Agreement, by and between Roku, Inc. and Stephen Kay, dated November 15, 2013.

S-1

333-220318

10.9

9/1/2017

 

10.11 +

Employment Terms Agreement, by and between Roku, Inc. and Stephen Shannon, dated August 29, 2012.

S-1

333-220318

10.10

9/1/2017

 

10.12 +

Employment Terms Agreement, by and between Roku, Inc. and Steve Louden, dated June 11, 2015.

S-1

333-220318

10.11

9/1/2017

 

10.13 +

Employment Terms Agreement, by and between Roku, Inc. and Charles Smith, dated August 27, 2012.

 S-1

333-220318

10.12

 9/1/2017

 

10.14 +

Employment Terms Agreement, by and between Roku, Inc. and Scott Rosenberg, dated October 30, 2012.

 S-1

333-220318

10.13

9/1/2017

 


10.15 +

Roku, Inc. Severance Benefit Plan.

S-1

333-220318

10.25

9/1/2017

 

10.16

Sublease for 170/180 Knowles Drive, by and between Roku, Inc. and Netflix, Inc., dated August 18, 2015.

S-1

333-220318

10.26

9/1/2017

 

10.17

Sublease for 100 Winchester Circle, by and between Roku, Inc. and Netflix, Inc., dated August 18, 2015.

S-1

333-220318

10.27

9/1/2017

 

10.18

Sublease for 150 Winchester Circle, by and between Roku, Inc. and Netflix, Inc., dated August 18, 2015.

S-1

333-220318

10.28

9/1/2017

 

10.19 +

Independent Contractor Services Agreement by and between Roku, Inc. and Neil Hunt, dated September 10, 2017.

S-1/A

333-220318

10.30

9/18/2017

 

10.20

Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, by and between Roku, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank, dated November 18, 2014.

S-1

333-220318

10.14

9/1/2017

 

10.21

First Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, by and between Roku, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank, dated May  14, 2015.

S-1

333-220318

10.15

9/1/2017

 

10.22

Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, by and between Roku, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank, June 9, 2017.

S-1

333-220318

10.16

9/1/2017

 

10.23

Subordinated Loan and Security Agreement, by and between Roku, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank, dated June 9, 2017.

S-1

333-220318

10.17

9/1/2017

 

21.1

List of Subsidiaries of the Roku, Inc.

 

 

 

 

X

23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

 

 

 

 

X

24.1

Power of Attorney

 

 

 

 

X

31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  

 

 

 

 

X

31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

 

X

32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *

 

 

 

 

X

32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *

 

 

 

 

X

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document.

 

 

 

 

X

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

 

 

 

 

X

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

 

 

 

 

X

101.

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition.

 

 

 

 

X

101.

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase

 

 

 

 

X

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

 

 

 

 

X

  Incorporated by Reference 
NumberExhibit TitleFormFile No.Exhibit
Filing
Date
Filed
Herewith
       
2.18-K001-382112.111/14/2019 
       
3.18-K001-382113.110/3/2017 
       
3.2S-1/A333-2203183.49/18/2017 
       
4.1     
       
4.2S-1/A333-2203184.19/18/2017 
       
4.310-K001-382114.33/2/2020 
       
10.1 +S-1333-22031810.39/1/2017 
       
10.2 +S-1333-22031810.49/1/2017 
       
10.3 +S-1/A333-22031810.59/18/2017 
      
10.4 +X
       
10.5 +X
10.6 +8-K001-3821110.110/1/2021 
10.7 +S-1/A333-22031810.89/18/2017 
       
10.8 +S-1A333-22031810.99/18/2017 

101


       
10.9 +S-1333-22031810.99/1/2017 
       
10.10 +S-1333-22031810.119/1/2017 
       
10.11 + S-1333-22031810.139/1/2017 
       
10.12 +10-K001-3821110.183/2/2020 
       
10.13 +8-K001-3821199.17/16/2019 
       
10.1410-Q001-3821110.268/10/2018 
       
10.1510-Q001-3821110.278/10/2018 
       
10.1610-K001-3821110.303/1/2019 
       
10.1710-K001-3821110.313/1/2019 
       
10.1810-K001-3821110.323/1/2019 
       
10.1910-Q001-3821110.18/9/2019 
       
10.2010-Q001-3821110.28/9/2019 
       
10.2110-Q001-3821110.38/9/2019 
       
10.2210-Q001-3821110.48/9/2019 
       
21.1    X
23.1X
24.1X
31.1X
31.2X
102


32.1 *X
32.2 *X
101.INSInline XBRL Instance DocumentX
101.SCHInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema DocumentX
101.CALInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase DocumentX
101.DEFInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase DocumentX
101.LABInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase DocumentX
101.PREInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase DocumentX
104Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
* These exhibits are furnished with this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not incorporated by reference in any filing of Roku, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filings.

+Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.


SIGNATURES

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.
103


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on this 1st18th day of March 2018.

Roku, Inc.

February 2022.
 Roku, Inc.
By:/s/ Anthony Wood
Anthony Wood
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ Steve Louden
Steve Louden
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


104


POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Anthony Wood and Steve Louden, and each of them, as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in their name, place, and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming that all said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them or their or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Annual Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

NameTitleDate

By:

/s/ Anthony Wood

ANTHONY WOOD

Anthony Wood

President, and Chief Executive Officer

and Chairman
February 18, 2022

Anthony Wood

(Principal Executive Officer)

By:

/s/ Steve Louden

STEVE LOUDEN

Steve Louden

Chief Financial Officer

February 18, 2022

Steve Louden

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

/s/ RAVI AHUJADirectorFebruary 18, 2022
Ravi Ahuja
/s/ MAI FYFIELDDirectorFebruary 18, 2022
Mai Fyfield
/s/ JEFFREY HASTINGSDirectorFebruary 18, 2022
Jeffrey Hastings
/s/ LAURIE SIMON HODRICKDirectorFebruary 18, 2022
Laurie Simon Hodrick
/s/ NEIL HUNTDirectorFebruary 18, 2022
Neil Hunt
/s/ GINA LUNADirectorFebruary 18, 2022
Gina Luna
/s/ RAY ROTHROCKDirectorFebruary 18, 2022
Ray Rothrock

103

105