C

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 29, 201727, 2019

or

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                     to                    

Commission file number 000-50646

 

Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

Delaware

 

61-1430858

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(IRS Employer

Identification No.)

 

 

26462 Corporate Avenue

Hayward, California

 

94545

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(510) 576-4400

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

 

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, $0.001 par value

 

The NASDAQ Global Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes       No  

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes       No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes       No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes       No  

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and emerging“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer

 

  

Accelerated filer

 

 

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer

 

  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

  

Smaller reporting company

 

 

 

 

 

Emerging growth company

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes       No  

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, based on the closing sale price of the Registrant’s common stock on June 30, 201728, 2019 as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market, was approximately $615.2$539.6 million. Shares of common stock held by each executive officer and director have been excluded from this computation. The determination of affiliate status for this purpose is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

Number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of February 23, 2018: 38,469,72421, 2020: 39,888,762

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be delivered to stockholders in connection with the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K where indicated. Such proxy statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 29, 2017.27, 2019.

 

 


 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

Page

 

  

PART I

 

Item 1

  

Business

3

Item 1A

  

Risk Factors

11

Item 1B

  

Unresolved Staff Comments

2830

Item 2

  

Properties

2830

Item 3

  

Legal Proceedings

2931

Item 4

  

Mine Safety Disclosures

2931

 

 

 

  

PART II

 

Item 5

  

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

3032

Item 6

  

Selected Consolidated Financial Data

3134

Item 7

  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

3235

Item 7A

  

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

4145

Item 8

  

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

4347

Item 9

  

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

7281

Item 9A

  

Controls and Procedures

7281

Item 9B

  

Other Information

7282

 

 

 

  

PART III

 

Item 10

  

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

7383

Item 11

  

Executive Compensation

7383

Item 12

  

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

7383

Item 13

  

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

7484

Item 14

  

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

7484

 

 

 

  

PART IV

 

Item 15

  

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

7585

Item 16

 

Form 10-K Summary

7887

 


This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “targets,” “goals,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “continues,” “may,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely results,” variations of such words, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not necessarily mean that a statement is not forward-looking. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning the following: projections of our financial performance, our anticipated growth and trends in our business, levels of capital expenditures, the adequacy of our capital resources to fund operations and growth, our ability to compete effectively with our competitors, our strategies and ability to protect our intellectual property, future acquisitions, customer demand, our manufacturing and procurement process, employee matters, supplier relations, foreign operations (including our operations in China and Singapore), the legal and regulatory backdrop (including environmental regulation), our exposure to market risks and other characterizations of future events or circumstances described in this Annual Report. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict, including those identified below, under “Risk Factors,” and elsewhere herein. Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason, except as required by law.

Item 1.

Business

Overview

Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc., (“UCT”, the “Company” or “We”) a Delaware corporation, was founded in November 2002 for the purpose of acquiring Ultra Clean Technology Systems and Services, Inc. a US-based company founded in 1991 by Mitsubishi Corporation and operated as a subsidiary of Mitsubishi. UCT became a publicly traded company on the NASDAQ Global Market in March 2004. In 2006, we acquired Sieger Engineering, Inc. to better position ourselves as a subsystem supplier primarily to the semiconductor and display capital equipment industries. Sieger Engineering merged into Ultra Clean Technology Systems and Service, Inc. in July of 2016. To facilitate operations in Asia, Ultra Clean Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd (“UCTS”) and Ultra Clean Micro-Electronics Equipment (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (“UCME”) were established in China in 2005 and 2007, respectively, and Ultra Clean Asia Pacific, Pte, Ltd. was established in Singapore in 2008. UCTS merged into UCME in December of 2015. Our July 2012 acquisition of American Integration Technologies LLC (“AIT”) added to our existing customer base in the semiconductor and medical spaces and provided additional manufacturing capabilities. In 2014, we launched Prototype Asia, our 3D printing business in Singapore, to develop additive manufacturing capabilities for our customer base. In February 2015, we acquired Marchi Thermal Systems, Inc. (“Marchi”) and in July 2015, we acquired MICONEX s.r.o (“Miconex”), both privately held companies with a majority of their sales in the semiconductor market. Marchi designs and manufactures specialty heaters, thermocouples and temperature controllers, delivering flexible heating elements and thermal solutions to our customers. The Company believes heaters are increasingly critical in equipment design for the most advanced semiconductor nodes. Miconex is a provider of advanced precision fabrication of plastics that has expanded our capabilities with existing customers. Separately, in November 2016, we determined to seek to dispose of a portion of our 3D printing business, consistent with our strategy to focus on producing product tools for the semiconductor and display capital equipment industries.

We are a global leader in the design, engineering and manufacture of production tools, modules and subsystems for the semiconductor and display capital equipment industries.markets. Our products include chemical delivery modules, frame assemblies, gas delivery systems, fluid delivery systems, precision robotics, process modules as well as other high level assemblies. Our services provide part cleaning, surface encapsulation, and high sensitivity micro contamination analysis primarily for the semiconductor device makers and wafer fabrication (WFE) equipment markets.

On April 15, 2019, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Dynamic Manufacturing Solutions, LLC ("DMS"), a semiconductor weldment and solutions provider. Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, we paid $29.9 million in cash for DMS, subject to certain post-closing adjustments as provided in the Acquisition Agreement. We providemay pay up to $12.5 million in additional cash earn-out payments to the former owners of DMS if, post-acquisition, the combined weldment business achieves certain gross profit and gross margin targets for the twelve months ending June 26, 2020.

With our customers specialized engineeringacquisition of Quantum Global Technologies, LLC (“QGT”), on August 27, 2018, a leader in parts cleaning, coating and manufacturing solutions for these highly complex, highly configurable, limited volume applications. In addition,foundry related analytical services, we routinely handle major volume and design changes during the manufacturing process and provide equipment manufacturers flexibility when responding to dynamic market changes. We enable them to realize lower manufacturing costs and reduced design-to-delivery cycle times while maintaining high quality standards.

We provideexpanded our customers with broad solutions that combine our expertise in design, assembly, test and component characterization. Our customers value our highly flexible global manufacturing operations, our excellence in quality control and our scale and financial stability. Our global footprint helps us drive down total manufacturing costs, and reduce design-to-delivery cycle times while maintaining high quality standards for our customers. We believe these characteristics help uscapabilities to provide global solutions for our customers’ product demands.ultra-high purity parts cleaning, process tool part recoating, surface treatment, and analytical services to the semiconductor and related industries.


We ship a majority of our products and provide most of our services to U.S. registered customers with locations both in and outside the U.S. In addition to U.S. manufacturing and service operations, we manufacture products and provide parts cleaning and other related services in our Asian and European facilities to support local and U.S. based customers. We conduct our operating activities primarily through our wholly owned subsidiaries, Ultra Clean Technology Systems and Service, Inc., AIT,American Integration Technologies, LLC, Ultra Clean Micro-Electronics Equipment (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Ultra Clean Asia Pacific, Pte, Ltd., MarchiUCT Thermal Solutions, Inc., UCT Fluid Delivery Solutions s.r.o. (FDS), QGT and Miconex. DMS. 

Over the long-term, we believe the semiconductor market we serve will continue to grow based on demand from a broad range of drivers, including applications such as autonomous vehicles, the Internet of Things, high performance computing, artificial intelligence, and technology to support the data sharing economy. We also believe that semiconductor equipment OEMs are increasingly relying on partners like UCT to fulfill their expanding capacity requirements.


Historically, we have operated under one operating segment. However, as a result of the acquisition of QGT, we created an additional segment in the first quarter of 2019. We reorganized our organizational and reporting structure to capture efficiencies and operating leverage from our recent acquisition and now operate and report results for two operating segments: Semiconductor Products and Solutions (“SPS”) and Semiconductor Services Business (“SSB”).

Our international salesrevenues represented 53.6%52.1%, 48.0%56.7% and 34.5%53.6% of salestotal revenues for fiscal years ended 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively. See Note 1112 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information about our geographic areas.

Our SolutionSuite of Offerings

Our focus is on providing specialized engineeringWe are a leading developer and manufacturing solutionssupplier of critical subsystems, ultra-high purity cleaning and analytical services primarily for highly complex, highly configurable, limited volume systems.the semiconductor industry. We enableoffer our customers to realize lower manufacturing costs and reducedan integrated outsourced solution for major subassemblies, improved design-to-delivery cycle times, while maintaining high quality standards.design for manufacturability, prototyping and component manufacturing, and tool chamber parts cleaning and coating, as well as micro contamination analytical services. We offer our customers:

A vertically integrated solution for complex and highly configurable systems. We provide our original equipment manufacturing (OEM) customers a broad outsourced solution for the development, design, component sourcing and cleaning, prototyping, engineering, manufacturing and testing of advanced systems. We utilize our machining, sheet metal,weldment and frame fabrication capabilities with highly specialized engineering, global supply chain management, and assembly capabilities to produce high performance products that are customized to meet the needs of our customers as well asand their respective end users. We enable our customers to minimize thetheir overall number of suppliers, and manage our globalsimplify their supply chain logistics toand reduce inventory levels that our customers would otherwise be required to manage.their inventories.

Subsystem manufacturing. Our experience with the demanding requirements in semiconductor equipment manufacturing has enabled us to grow from primarily supplying gas delivery modules to being a leading developer and supplier of other critical modules and subsystems. These assemblies include chemical and fluid delivery modules, wafer transport, and process modules.

Improved design-to-delivery cycle times. Our strong customer relationships with our customers and familiarity with their product requirements and the ever changingever-changing needs of their customer base help us reduce their design-to-delivery cycle times. We seek to optimize our supply chain management, design and manufacturing coordination and controls to respond rapidly to order requests, enabling us to decrease design-to-deliveryproduct design and customization cycle times for our customers. Because our engineers work closely with our customers’ engineers and understand the fabrication, assembly and testing of their products, we often can improve their design for manufacturability, thereby improving their cost, quality and consistency.

Component neutral design and manufacturing. We do not manufacture components such as mass flow controllers and valves which are selected based on manufacturer published specifications. Our component neutral position enables us to recommend components on the basis of technology, performance and cost and to optimize our customers’ overall designs based on these criteria. Furthermore, our neutral approach allowscriteria while allowing us to maintain close relationships with a wide range of component suppliers.

Component testing capabilities. We utilize our technical expertise to test and characterize key components and subsystems. We have made significant investments in advanced analytical and automated test equipment, enabling us to test and qualify key components. We can perform diagnostic tests, design verifications and failure analyses for our customers and suppliers. Our analytical and testing capabilities of supplier components provide us the ability to recommend to our customers a wide range of appropriate component and design choices for their products.

Increased integration with OEMs through local presence. Our local presence in close proximity to the facilities of most of our OEM customers enables us to remain closely integrated with their design, development and implementation teams. This level of integration enables us to respond quickly and efficiently to customer changes and requests.


Precision machining capabilities. We manufacture high quality, precision machined parts using equipment capable of efficiently providing complex parts with exacting tolerances. Our diverse precision fabrication equipment enables us to manufacture a broad range of machined parts using a wide range of materials, from exotic metals to high purity plastics. Our manufacturing capabilities include horizontal and vertical milling, turning, welding and joining, among others. We own and operate advanced machining and fabrication systems at multiple sites in the U.S., Europe and Asia.

Precision frame fabrication. We design and manufacture weldments and frames using tubing or sheet metal in all customary sizes with exacting standards to meet or exceed our customers’ needs. We utilize over 25 years of experience in the fabrication of complex framescomponents to provide a cost competitive edge in our vertical integration model. Many of our customers require frames that are powder coated and in 2016, we added this capability toin 2016.  In 2019, we expanded our Chandler, Arizona frame fabrication facility.weldment capabilities via the acquisition of DMS.

Precision sheet metal fabrication. Our ability to provide broad sheet metal solutions for our customers enables us to support prototype to volume production, from brackets to sheet metal frames, and from structural to high quality cosmetic finishing of the final product. Our automated equipment and design capabilities allow us to develop accurate prototype and final production products for our customers.


Custom thermal control. We design and manufacture heaters, sensors, and controllers for precise temperature control. These products are complementary to our gas delivery systems products.

Custom thermal control. Our acquisition of Marchi has enabled us to design and manufacture heaters, sensors, and controllers for precise temperature control. These products are complementary to our gas delivery systems products.

Parts cleaning and coating and analytical verification: Our acquisition of QGT and the subsequent creation of our SSB Business Unit has enabled us to extend our offerings to our OEM customers and added integrated device manufacturers (IDM) to our customer base. Through our Services business unit, we now offer customers validated, ultra-high purity outsourced process tool chamber parts cleaning and coating services. Included in these services are tool part process optimization solutions that could lower the total cost of ownership for our customers. Through ChemTrace®, we also now provide analytical verification of process tool chamber part cleaning effectiveness. In addition, ChemTrace® offers micro contamination analysis of tool parts, wafers and depositions, chemicals, cleanroom materials, deionized water and airborne molecular contamination.

Our Strategy

Our objective is to maintaingrow our position as a leading solutions and service provider in the semiconductor markets we serve, primarily the semiconductor and display capital equipment market, while supporting other technologically similar markets in the display, consumer, medical, energy, industrial and research industries. Our strategy is comprised of the following key elements:

Expand our solutions and service market share with semiconductor capital equipment OEMs and IDMs. We believe that equipment outsourcing among OEMs creates a significant market opportunity for us to grow our business with existing and new customers. We believe our customers will continue to outsource critical subsystems and that we are well positioned to capture a significant portion of these outsourcing opportunities. We believe that our continued focus on efficient manufacturing, reduced design-to-delivery cycle times, and high quality and reliability will also allow us to gain market share. Similarly, we believe there is room to gain market share with our SSB business offerings, both with IDMs and OEMs, as customers typically outsource these solutions. By providing customers process improvement through consistently cleaner parts and analytical verification of process tool chamber part cleaning effectiveness, we have expanded our total available market significantly.

Develop or acquire solutions that allow our customer’s customers to succeed at the latest 2x or 1x nanometer leading edge of the semiconductor processing nodes. We are expandingcontinue to expand the number and type of subsystems and services that we offer in this advancedrapidly advancing semiconductor market.

Leverage our geographic presence in lower cost manufacturing regions. Our manufacturing facilities in Shanghai, China allow us to produce in a low costlow-cost region. These facilities house precision machined parts and subsystem assembly, operations. Together, these facilitiesweldment and thermal control heater operations and put us in close proximity to the manufacturing facilities of existing and potential customers and their end users. In Singapore, we have a procurement office and substantial manufacturing capabilities. Our manufacturing facilities all use similar processes and procedures, enabling us to respond rapidly to demand changes from our customer. Several QGT cleaning and analytic facilities are also in low cost regions, strategically close to our customers, adding to our competitive advantage.

Drive profitable growth with our flexible cost structure. We implement cost containment and capacity enhancement initiatives throughout the semiconductor capital equipment demand cycle and benefit from the global presence and efficiencies of our supply chain. In addition, we believe our Shanghai and Singaporeoverseas facilities position us to respond effectively to future business demands. We employ a core engineering strategy with flexible partnering to augment our staff during the steep rise and fall often associated with cycles in the semiconductor industry.

Continue to selectively pursue strategic acquisitions. We will continue to consider strategic acquisitions that will enable us to improve our financial model, expand our geographic presence, secure new customers and diversify into complementary products and services markets as well as broaden our technological and cleaning and analytical capabilities in the markets we serve.

Strengthen vertical integration. We continue to invest in our operations to meet customer quality and delivery targets. We have expanded welding operations at several of our manufacturing sites, developed/built in-house powder coating capability, and purchased new machining tools. In addition to organic growth, we continue to manage/foster key strategic partnerships to efficiently meet production needs.

In late 2019, UCT executed on a series of cost improvement initiatives aimed at improving the flexibility of its operating and financial model over time. These initiatives include the closure or combination of some facilities to maximize operations, the postponement of selective capital expenditures, and a reduction in workforce, without constraining our capacity or ability to grow when the semiconductor industry recovers. The final initiatives are expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2020 and will provide benefit to our ongoing operational performance.  


Strengthen vertical integration

Products. We continue to invest in our operations to meet customer delivery targets. We have expanded welding operations at several of our manufacturing sites, developed/built in-house powder coating capability, and purchased new machining tools. In addition to organic growth, we continue to manage/foster key strategic partnerships to efficiently meet production needs.

Products

We design, develop, prototype, manufacture and test subsystems, primarily for the semiconductor capital equipment. We also support customers in the consumer, medical, energy, industrial, and research industries.equipment market. Our products include precision robotic solutions, gas delivery systems, a variety of industrial and automation production equipment products;products, and subsystems that includesinclude wafer cleaning modules, chemical delivery modules, top-plate assemblies, frame assemblies, and process modules.

Chemical delivery modules: Chemical delivery modules deliver gases and reactive chemicals in a liquid or gaseous form from a centralized subsystem to the reaction chamber. The module may be a gas delivery system in combination with liquid and vapor precursor delivery systems or may be a liquid delivery system in combination with a liquid storage system.

Frame assemblies: Frame assemblies are support structures fabricated from steel tubing or folded sheet metal and form the backbone to which all other assemblies are attached. The complexitycomplex manufacturing of the frames includes powder coating, pneumatic harnesses and cables integration that connect other critical subsystems together.

Gas delivery systems: A typical OEM gas delivery system consists of one or more gas lines, comprised of small diameter internally polished stainless steel tubing,weldments, filters, mass flow controllers, regulators, pressure transducers and valves, component heaters, and an integrated electronic and/or pneumatic control system. These systems are typically pallet mounted on a pallet and are typically enclosed in a sheet metal encasing. Our gas delivery system designs are developed in collaboration with our customers and are customized to meet the needs of specific processing requirements for OEMs. OurWhile several customers either specify the particular brandsfull system bill of components they want incorporated into a particular system or rely onmaterials, many leverage our design expertise and component characterization capabilities to help them select the appropriate components for their particular system.

Fluid delivery system: A typical OEM liquid delivery system consists of one or more chemical delivery units, comprised of small diameter high purity PFA tubing, filters, flow controllers, regulators, component heaters, and an integrated electronic and/or pneumatic control system. These units are typically contained in a plastic enclosure and further integrated into a frame. Our liquid delivery system designs are developed in collaboration with our customers and are customized to meet the needs of specific processing requirementrequirements for OEMs. OurAlthough several customers either specify the particularfull system bill of materials, and the brands of components they want incorporated into a particular system ormany rely on our design expertise and component characterization capabilities to help them select the appropriate components for their particular system.

Precision robotics: Precision robotic systems are used when accurate controlled motion is required. Some of the systems that employ robotic systems are: semiconductor wafer and chip handling, wire bonding and industrial equipment.

Process modules: Process modules refer to the larger subsystems of semiconductor manufacturing tools that process integrated circuits onto wafers. Process modules include several smaller subsystems such as the frame assembly, top-plate assembly and gas and chemical delivery modules, as well as the chamber and electronic, pneumatic and mechanical subsystems.

Other high level assemblies: Other high level assemblies refer to large subsystems used in semiconductor manufacturing, display, medical, energy, industrial and research industries.

Services

Our services business includes ultra-high purity outsourced process tool chamber parts cleaning and coating services, tool part life extension and process tool part optimization solutions, and micro-contamination analytical testing, primarily for the semiconductor device manufacturers and wafer fabrication equipment markets.

Parts cleaning and coating: Through our QuantumClean® sites we offer customers validated, ultra-high purity outsourced process tool chamber parts cleaning and coating services. Included in these services are tool part process optimization solutions that could lower the total cost of ownership for our customers.

Micro-contamination analysis: Through our ChemTrace® locations we offer micro-contamination analysis of tool parts, wafers and depositions, chemicals, cleanroom materials, deionized water and airborne molecular contamination. We also provide analytical verification of process tool chamber part cleaning effectiveness.


Customers

We sell our products and services primarily to customers in the semiconductor capital equipment industry,and semiconductor integrated device manufacturing industries, and we also have salessell to the display, consumer, medical, energy, industrial, and research equipment industries.

The majority of our revenue is intotal revenues comes from the semiconductor capital equipment industry (OEM’s), which is highly concentrated, andso we are therefore highly dependent upon a small number of customers. Our two largest revenue customers in fiscal year 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 were Applied Materials, Inc. and Lam Research Corporation, each of which accounted for more than 10.0% of our total salesrevenues in fiscal years 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015.2017. As a group, our respective year’s top two customers accounted for 84.4%66.9%, 82.2%76.6% and 77.0%84.4% of the Company’s salesrevenues for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The composition

Approximately 94.3% of our most significant customers has changedtotal revenues came from time to time based on various factors, including acquisition activity by our customers.the semiconductor integrated device manufacturing industry, which include IDM, Foundry, OEM, sub-tier suppliers.

We have successfully qualified as a supplier of equipment, cleaning, coating and analytical services with each of our customers who require it. This lengthy qualification process involves the inspection and audit of our facilities and evaluation by our customers of our engineering, documentation, manufacturing and quality control processes and procedures. Our customers generally place orders with suppliers who have met and continue to meet their qualification criteria.

Customer Business Management

We sell and support our products and services through our Customer Business Management organization which, as of December 29, 2017, consisted of approximately 102 customer relationship directors, managers and support staff.organization. Our customer relationship directors are responsible for establishing sales strategy and setting the objectives for specific customer accounts. Each customer relationship manager is dedicated to a specific customer account and is responsible for maintaining strong working relationships with that customer. Customer relationship managers work closely with customers andcustomer, in many cases provide on-site support. OEM Customer relationship managers often attend customers’ internal meetings related to production and engineering design and quality to ensure that customer expectations are interpreted and communicated properly to our operations group. Customer relationship managers also work with our customers to identify and meet their cost and design-to-delivery cycle time objectives. Our IDM Customer relationship managers work with process tool owners and Fab maintenance managers relating to the development and validation of cleaning recipes, addressing new tools cleaning and analytical requirements, and optimizing cleaning processes and analytical testing requirements to support node transitions.

We have dedicated new business development managers responsible for new business development for gas delivery systemsboth our product and other critical subsystems.service businesses. Our new business development managers initiate and develop long-term, multilevel customer relationships with customers and work closely with customersthem on new business opportunities throughout the design-to-delivery cycle.opportunities. Our customer relationship organization includes technical sales support for order placement, spare parts quotes, and production status updates.updates as well as service and maintenance contracts and analysis business. We have a technical relationship representative located at eachmost of our manufacturing facilities.

We integrate new business wins into our facilities via a rigorous product transition process, working in concert with our customers to ensure all product production, andcleaning and/or test requirements are identified, documented, and validated. We employ the same process at all our sites, enabling products and service offerings to smoothly transition into and between our sites as needed to support customer demand.

In addition, we have developed aan overall service and support infrastructure to provide our customers with service and support 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Our dedicated global field service engineers provide customer support through the performance of on-site installation, servicing and repair of our subsystems.repair.

Technology Development

We engage in ongoing technology development efforts in order to remain a technology leader for gas delivery systems and to further develop our expertise in other critical subsystems. Our design engineering and new product engineering groups support our technology development activities. Our technology development group worksWe work closely with our customers to identify and anticipate changes and trends in next-generation equipment. Our technology development group participatesWe participate in customer technology partnership programs that focus on process application requirements for gas and liquid delivery systems and other critical subsystems. These development efforts are designed to meet specific customer requirements in the areas of subsystem design, materials, component selection and functionality. Our technology development group also works directly with our suppliers to help them identify new component technologies and make necessary changes in, and enhancements to, the components that we


integrate into our products. Our analytical and testing capabilities enable us to evaluate multiple supplier component technologies and provide our customers with a wide range of appropriate component and design choices for their gas delivery systems and other critical subsystems.


Our analytical and testing capabilities also help us anticipate technological changes and requirements in component features for our core UCT next-generation gas delivery systems and other critical subsystems. We are developing additional features to improve the performance and functionality of our gas delivery systems and other critical subsystems. Our technology development activities for next-gen gas delivery and new product engineering expenses were approximately $11.7 million, $9.9 million and $9.6 million for the 2017, 2016 and 2015 fiscal years, respectively. other critical subsystems are performed principally in Hayward, California.

We perform ouralso engage in ongoing technology development to maintain technological leadership in the cleaning, coating and analytical markets. Our Services business works closely with customers to identify and anticipate changes that will be required in next-generation equipment. SSB’s technical capability is becoming extremely critical and differentiated to ensure high wafer yields and throughput as geometries shrink and density increases. SSB’s development activities principally at our facilitiesare performed primarily in Hayward, California.Phoenix, AZ.

Intellectual Property

Our success depends in part on our ability to maintain and protect our proprietary technology and to conduct our business without infringing the proprietary rights of others. Our business isBoth our products and services businesses largely dependentdepend upon our design, engineering, manufacturing, testing, cleaning, coating and testinganalytical know-how. We also rely on a combination of trade secrets and confidentiality provisions, and to a much lesser extent, patents, copyrights and trademarks, to protect our proprietary rights. We have four128 patents with various expiration dates, ranging from 2019 to 2034 as a result of our acquisition of Marchi in February 2015.mostly through QGT and its subsidiaries. We have no pending U.S. patents. Intellectual property that we develop on behalf of our customers is generally owned exclusively by those customers.

We require our employees, suppliers and potential business partners to enter into confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements before we disclose to them any sensitive or proprietary information regarding our products, technology or business plans. We require employees to assign to us proprietary information, inventions and other intellectual property they create, modify or improve.

Competition

Our industry is highly fragmented. When we compete for new business, we face competition from other suppliers of gas delivery systems, and other critical subsystems, cleaning and analytical services, as well as the internal manufacturing and services groups of our customers. Customers that have elected to outsource their gas delivery systems and other critical subsystems including cleaning and analytics, could elect in the future to develop and manufacture these subsystems internally, leading to further competition.

Our principal competitor for our gas delivery systems is Ichor Systems, Inc., and our principal competitors for other critical subsystems are Flex Ltd., Foxsemicon Integrated Technology Inc. and Celestica Inc. Some of these competitors have substantially greater financial, technical, manufacturing and marketing resources than we do. We expect our competitors to continue to improve the performance of their current products and to introduce new products or new technologies that could adversely affect sales of our current and future products. In addition,For our services, cleaning and coating offerings, our main competitors in the US are Pentagon Technologies and Cleanpart, and in Korea, KoMiCo. For analytical services our primary competitors are Balazs (an Air Liquide company) and Cerium Labs.

The limited number of potential customers in our industry further intensifies competition. The primary competitive factors in our industry are quality, meeting customer timeline demands, price, technology, quality, design-to-delivery cycle time, reliability in meetingcustomer qualification approvals, the development of product demand, servicerecipes for cleaning and analytics and historical customer relationships. We anticipate that increased competitive pressures will cause intensified price-based competition and we may have to reduce the prices of our products. In addition, we expect to face new competitors as we enter new markets.

Employees

As of December 29, 2017, we had 2,747 employees, of which 466 were temporary. Of our total employees, there were 23 in engineering, 16 in technology development, 102 in sales and support, 1,740 in direct manufacturing, 700 in indirect manufacturing and 166 in executive and administrative functions. These figures include 1,051 employees in Asia and 349 employees in Europe. None of our employees are represented by a labor union and we have not experienced any work stoppages.


Governmental Regulation and Environmental Matters

Our operations are subject to federal, state and local regulatory requirements and foreign laws relating to environmental, waste management and health and safety matters, including measures relating to the release, use, storage, treatment, transportation, discharge, disposal and remediation of contaminants, hazardous substances and waste, as well as practices and procedures applicable to the construction and operation of our UCT facilities.

UCT’s QuantumClean® business participates in the Responsible Business Alliance’s Responsible Minerals Assurance Process for Tantalum. Our cleaning processes for tantalum-deposited parts recovers the tantalum, enabling it to re-enter the commodity market and reduce the demand for mined material, the majority of which originates from the Conflict Region in Africa.


Although cleaning is a chemical-intensive business, UCT’s QuantumClean® group, where possible, utilizes chemical-free processing to remove significant volumes of deposited material. Reduction in the volume of film being chemically removed reduces the amount of chemicals used to meet the target cleanliness specifications.

The semiconductor industry has stringent packaging requirements and include the need to maintain the cleanliness of part/system and provide structural support of heavy modules. These requirements may necessitate product-specific crates be designed and fabricated or plastic cleanroom boxes be used. To minimize packaging waste UCT has implemented re-use programs for these type of materials with our customer and suppliers.

Our past or future operations may result in injury or claims of injury by employees or the public which may result in material costs and liabilities to us. Although some risk of costs and liabilities related to these matters is inherent in our business, we believe that our business is in compliance with applicable regulations. However, new, modified or more stringent requirements or enforcement policies could be adopted, which could adversely affect us.

Employees

As of December 27, 2019, we had 4,400 employees, of which 460 were temporary. Of our total employees, there were 88 in engineering, 16 in technology development, 264 in sales and support, 2,882 in direct manufacturing, 779 in indirect manufacturing and 371 in executive and administrative functions. These figures include 1,884 employees in Asia and 583 employees in Europe. None of our employees are represented by a labor union and we have not experienced any work stoppages.

Available Information

We file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. You may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the Public Reference Room maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may also request copies of all or any portion of such material from the SEC at prescribed rates. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference room. In addition, materials filed electronically with the SEC are available at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

In addition, we make available free of charge, on or through our website at http://www.uct.com, our annual, quarterly and current reports and any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing such reports with, or furnishing them to, the SEC. This website address is intended to be an inactive textual reference only; none of the information contained on our website is part of this report or is incorporated by reference herein.

Executive Officers

Set forth below is information concerning our executive officers as of February 23, 2018.21, 2020.

 

Name

 

Age

 

Position

James P. Scholhamer

 

5153

 

Chief Executive Officer & Director

Sheri Savage

 

4749

 

Chief Financial Officer; Senior Vice President of Finance and SecretaryOfficer

Michael HendersonVijay S. Chinnasami

 

5754

Chief Operating Officer

W. Joseph Williams

47

President, Semiconductor Products & Solutions Business

William C. Bentinck

58

President, Semiconductor Services Business

Chris P. Siu

49

 

Senior Vice President, of EngineeringChief Accounting Officer

Deborah Hayward

56

Senior Vice President of Global Account Management

Lavi A. Lev

61

President of Asia

Mark G. BingamanJoan Sterling

 

62

 

Senior Vice President, of Global Materials and Supply Chain ManagementHuman Resources

Joe WilliamsPaul Y. Cho

 

4542

 

Senior Vice President of Customer Business Management

David Speirs

56

Senior Vice President of North America Operations

Joan Sterling

60

Senior Vice President of Global Human Resources

Ron D’Ercole

56

Senior Vice President of Global QualityGeneral Counsel, Corporate Secretary

 


James P. Scholhamer joined UCT the Company as Chief Executive Officer and a member of theour Board of Directors in January 2015. Prior to joining UCT,Ultra Clean, Mr. Scholhamer served in various capacities withas Corporate Vice President and General Manager of Applied Materials, Inc., most recently as corporate vice president and general manager ofleading the Equipment Products Group and Display Services Group withinof its Global Service Division from February 2011 to January 2015. Mr. Scholhamer was the corporate vice president and general manager of the Display Business Group from December 2008joined Applied Materials, Inc. in 2006, where, prior to February 2011 and vice presidenthis most recent position, he served as Vice President of Operations-Energy, for the Environmental and Display Products Division from July 2006 to December 2008 at Applied Materials, Inc.and Corporate Vice President and General Manager of the Display Business Group from December 2008 to February 2011. Prior to that, Mr. Scholhamer held various positions atworked for Applied Films Corporation from August 1997 to July 2006, including chief operating officer, chief technology officer and executive vice president as well as vice presidentVice President of Operations, Engineering and Research & Development. In additionDevelopment in the company’s German office from September 2002 to managing Applied Films GermanyJuly 2006 and Taiwan sites, Mr. Scholhamer served as vice president and general managerVice President of the Thin Film Coating Division and the Thin Film Equipment Division in the company’s Colorado office from July 2000 to September 2004. Prior to that, Mr. Scholhamer held various operational and technical positions in several companies related to the design and fabrication of optical components such as Visible, UV and X-ray optics.2002. Mr. Scholhamer holds a Bachelor of Science degree in materialsMaterials and metallurgical engineeringMetallurgical Engineering from the University of Michigan.


Sheri Savage has served as our Chief Financial Officer Senior Vice President of Finance and Secretary since July 2016. Ms. Savage joined the Company as the Senior Director of Finance in April 2009. She was Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Accounting Officer from February 2016 to July 2016. Prior to joining UCT,the Company, Ms. Savage served at Credence Systems Corporation, a manufacturer of test equipment for the global semiconductor industry, as its Corporate Controller and Vice President of Finance from February 2008 to February 2009 and as Director of Internal Audit from May 2006 to February 2008. Prior to Credence Systems, Ms. Savage served in various accounting and finance roles at Protiviti, a global business consulting and internal audit firm, and KLA-Tencor Corporation, a supplier of process control and yield management solutions for the semiconductor and related nanoelectronics industries. Ms. Savage also served as Manager, Business Process Risk Accounting, at Arthur Anderson LLP, the former accounting firm, from May 1996 to October 1999. Ms. Savage holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Managerial Economics from the University of California, Davis.

Michael Henderson joined UCT as our Senior Vice President of Engineering in May 2016. Mr. Henderson has more than 25 years of high tech engineering leadership experience with senior roles in R&D, process development, and production management. With tenures at Seagate, Avaya, Modumetal, and Grote Industries, he has had responsibilities worldwide leading aggressive product development and production ramps, manufacturing site transitions and outsourced partner management. Mr. Henderson has a M.S. in Physics from the University of Minnesota.

Deborah HaywardVijayan S. Chinnasami has served as our Chief Operating Officer since April 2019. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Chinnasami served as the Senior Vice President of Global Account Management sinceEMS Operations at Jabil Inc. from March 2017 to March 2019, as Chief Executive Officer of CaliBurger (Malaysia) from January 2007 and Vice President of Sales since October 2002. Ms. Hayward served as our Senior Sales Director from May 20012015 to October 2002, as Sales Director from February 1998 to May 2001January 2017 and as a major account managerChief Executive Officer of Advanced Optronic Devices (Malaysia) from October 1995January 2014 to February 1998. Prior to joining UCT in 1995, she was a customer service manager and account manager at Brooks Instruments from 1985 to 1995.

Lavi A. Lev has served as our President of Asia since April 2017 and our Senior Vice President, Asia from November 2011 to MarchJanuary 2017. Prior to joining UCT, Mr. Lev served in 2008 as a director and executive chairman of the Board of LTX-Credence Corporation, a provider of automated test equipment for the semiconductor industry. Mr. Lev was chief executive officer and president of Credence Systems Corporation from 2006 to 2008. Prior to that, Mr. LevChinnasami served as executive vice president and general manager of the products and solution business at Cadence Design Systems,in various capacities with SunEdison International, Inc. from 2000. Mr. Lev has 30 years of business, research and development and operational management experience in the Microprocessor Chip Design,(formerly MEMC Electronic Design Automation Software, Test Equipment and Contract Manufacturing industries. Mr. Lev holds a Bachelor of Science degree in electrical engineering from Technion, Israel Institute of Technology and also graduated from the Jerusalem Rubin Academy of Music.

Mark G. Bingaman has servedMaterials, Inc.), including most recently as our Senior Vice President, of GlobalSolar Materials, and Supply Chain Management since February 2010. Priorfrom May 2010 to joining UCT, Mr. Bingaman wasAugust 2014, where his responsibilities included the managing director at Applied Materials, Inc. in chargeexecutive management of the site in Tainan, Taiwan which manufactured equipment for solar, glasspolysilicon, wafer, cell and display industries. He held additional senior management positionsmodule businesses. Mr. Chinnasami’s previous roles have also included Senior Vice President, Industrial Business Unit at Applied Materials, Inc. starting from 2000. From 1999 to 2000,Johnson Electric Health Hong Kong and Vice President and General Manager, Consumer Segment of Flextronics International, Ltd. Mr. Bingaman was the director for supply chain management integration for Eaton Corporation. Mr. Bingaman held multiple positions at Aeroquip-Vickers, Inc. from 1995 to 1999 including vice president for global supply chain management for Vickers, Incorporated. He held various positions at McDonnell Douglas from 1977 to 1994 including vice president of operations for the McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Company from 1990 to 1994. Mr. BingamanChinnasami holds a Bachelor of ScienceBachelor’s degree in accountingProduction Engineering from theSwinburne University of Missouri and a Master of Science degree in management information systems from Southern Illinois University.Technology.

JoeW. Joseph Williams joined UCTthe Company in February 2015 with the acquisition of MarchiUCT Thermal Solutions, Inc. (“Thermal”) as Presidentpresident of Marchi. He continuesThermal, and has continued to manage MarchiThermal since that time. Mr. Williams has served as our Executive Vice President and servesPresident, Semiconductor Products & Solutions since October 2018 and as our Senior Vice President of Customer Business Management sincefrom October 2016.2016 to October 2018. Prior to joining the Company in 2015, Mr. Williams was presidentPresident of MarchiThermal from April 2013 to 2015. He worked previously at UCTthe Company as vice presidentVice President of new business development.New Business Development. Mr. Williams was Senior Vice President of Business Development & Engineering at AIT from 2007 to 2013. Prior to that, Mr. Williams co-founded Integrated Flow Systems and served as vice presidentVice President of engineeringEngineering and operationsOperations and directorDirector of engineeringEngineering and operationsOperations from 1997 to 2004. He worked at Watkins-Johnson Company as a mechanical design engineer from 1994 to 1997. Mr. Williams holds a Bachelor of Science Degreedegree in Mechanical Engineering from North Carolina State University.

William C. Bentinck has served as our President, Semiconductor Services Business since May 2019. Mr. Bentinck joined the Company as Senior Vice President, Semiconductor Services Business, in March 2019. Mr. Bentinck previously served as Executive Vice President and General Manager of Eugenus, Inc., a semiconductor equipment manufacturing company, from November 2017 to June 2018. Prior to that, Mr. Bentinck served as Vice President and General Manager of the Logic & Memories Technology Group for AIXTRON Inc., a manufacturer of systems and equipment to the semiconductor industry, from April 2014 to November 2017. From August 2006 to March 2014, Mr. Bentinck served as General Manager, Customer Support Business Group (Spares & Services) for Lam Research Corporation, a global supplier of wafer fabrication equipment and services to the semiconductor industry. Prior to Lam Research Corporation, Mr. Bentinck served in various roles of increasing responsibility at Novellus Systems, Inc., a provider of advanced process equipment for the global semiconductor industry, from 1991 through August 2006. Mr. Bentinck holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering, and a Master of Science degree in Engineering – Material Science, from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona.


David SpeirsChris P. Siu has served as our Senior Vice President, of North America OperationsChief Accounting Officer since 2010. Working in the semiconductor capital equipment industry for more than 20 years, Mr. Speirs has management experience in manufacturing, quality and operations. Mr. Speirs joined UCT in 2006 to manage the manufacturing operations of UCT’s Sieger Engineering, Inc. acquisition. He was instrumental in expanding the new product introduction group for UCT into a global organization.May 2019. Prior to joining UCT, he was previously the Company, Mr. Siu served as Vice President of Operations for MetaraFinance at PDF Solutions, Inc., a start-up venture manufacturing chemical metrology equipmentleading provider of differentiated data and analytics solutions to the semiconductor and electronics industries, since October 2018. Prior to PDF Solutions, Mr. Siu served at GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc., a global pure-play foundry for the semiconductor industry. From 1994industry, as its Corporate Controller from June 2014 to 2004, he held several director level management positionsOctober 2018, as Senior Director, Finance and Operations Controller from December 2013 to June 2014 and as Assistant Corporate Controller from November 2010 to December 2013. Prior to that, Mr. Siu served at NovellusTrident Microsystems, Inc. a provider of high-performance multimedia semiconductor solutions, as its Chief Accounting Officer and Director of Finance from February 2007 to November 2010. Prior to Trident Microsystems, Mr. Siu served at Varian Medial Systems, Inc. including Manufacturing, Operations Quality, a market-leading manufacturer of medical devices for the treatment of cancer, in different finance management roles from June 2004 to February 2007. Prior to that, he worked for Deloitte & Touche from August 2001 to June 2004 and CVD/PVD Operations.was previously with Ernst & Young from January 1996 to June 2001. Mr. SpeirsSiu holds a SCOTECBachelor of Science degree in Electrical EngineeringAccounting from Stow CollegeBrigham Young University in Hawaii and a Master of Engineering.Business Administration degree from the University of California at Berkeley. Mr. Siu is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) in California.

Joan Sterlinghas served as our Senior Vice President of Global Human Resources since 2016. Ms. Sterling joined UCTthe Company in March 2013 as Director of Global Human Resources. Prior to joining UCT,the Company, Ms. Sterling was the Human Resources Director for Engineering and Broadcast Operations at SiriusXM Satellite Radio from 2009 to 2013. She worked at Hitachi Data Systems from 2007 to 2009 as an executive change management consultant for a global IT redesign. Ms. Sterling served as human resource senior vice presidentHuman Resource Senior Vice President for the consumer credit group at Wells Fargo from 2005 to 2007. From 2000 to 2005, Ms. Sterling served in several senior director roles at Hewlett Packard managing human resources sites and functions of staffing, compensation, benefits, training and development. She was the corporate directorCorporate Director of human resource strategic planningHuman Resource Strategic Planning for First Energy Corporation from 1999 to 2000. She worked at Hewlett Packard Enterprise from 1994 to 1999 as the Midwest Region Headquarters Human Resource Manager. Ms. Sterling holds a Bachelor of Science degree in businessBusiness from DePaul University and a Master of Arts degree in organizational developmentOrganizational Development from Loyola University.

Ron D’ErcolePaul Y. Cho has served as our General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since October 2019. Mr. Cho brings over a decade of experience in various legal disciplines, including IP and commercial litigations, joint venture projects, and commercial transaction work. Most recently, from April 2016 to October 2019, Mr. Cho held the position of General Counsel and Corporate Secretary for the North American operations of the world’s second largest memory chip supplier, SK Hynix, Inc., and held the position of Senior Vice President of Global Quality sinceCounsel at its corporate headquarters from September 2014 to March 2016. Mr. D’Ercole joined UCT in December 2014 as Vice President of Quality.  Prior to joining UCT, he worked at Lam Research CorporationSK Hynix Inc., Mr. Cho served as Senior Legal Counsel for twelve yearsSamsung SDI, a storage battery manufacturing company, from June 2013 to September 2014 and held director level positionsas Legal Counsel for customer experience and corporate quality and services.LG Electronics, an electronics company, from April 2012 to May 2013. Mr. D’Ercole worked at Novellus Systems, Inc. from 1997 to 2002 as director of global spares and corporate quality assurance.  From 1992 to 1997, he worked at LSA Anodic Technologies, Inc. where he was a founder and the chief operations officer. Mr. D’ErcoleCho holds a Bachelor of Science degreeArts in chemical engineeringEnglish from the University of California, BerkeleyMichigan and a MBAJuris Doctor Degree from the University of San Francisco.Minnesota Law School.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

The following risk factors could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations and cause reputational harm, and should be carefully considered in evaluating the Company and its business, in addition to other information presented elsewhere in this report.

COVID-19 outbreak

The novel coronavirus COVID-19 is impacting all levels of the semiconductor industry and supply chain. For example:

A decrease in the production (and consumption) of electronics, such as smart phones, computers, servers and televisions, much of which is concentrated in Asia (specifically China), may result in lower chip demand. 

A reduced output from the semiconductor fabrication plants located in China and South Korea (and other regions experiencing a significant level of COVID-19 infections) may delay additional equipment move-in’s and supporting new orders at those fabrication plants. 

Our operations, as well as the operations of our OEM customers, at the equipment manufacturing sites located in these regions may be reduced or shut down. 


Our suppliers located in these regions may experience a reduction in output and difficulty finding a reliable delivery method for their products, which may result in a delay in delivering those products to us.

A decrease in the rate of parts cleaning cycles at the fabrication facilities located in these regions may reduce our SSB services in those regions. 

We are attempting to lessen the impact of COVID-19 to UCT equipment production by leveraging our extensive global supply chain and diversified factory footprint and, therefore, minimize the potential disruption to our customers. Our business continuity plan team has taken every precaution to protect our employees and factories with a wide array of preventive measures, including, among others, making protective gears and temperature sensing equipment available, implementing travel restriction and work from home policies, an increase in hygienic and janitorial services, and enforcing preventative quarantines. 

The cyclical and highly volatile nature of the industries we serve could harm our operating results.

Our business and operating results depend in significant part upon capital expenditures by manufacturers in the semiconductor capital equipment, consumer, medical, energy, industrial and researchdisplay industries, which in turn depend upon the current and anticipated market demand for such products. Historically, the industries we serve (in particular the semiconductor industry) have been highly cyclical, with recurring periods of over-supply of products that have had a severe negative effect on the demand for capital equipment used to manufactureand related services involved in manufacturing such products. We have experienced and anticipate that we will continue to experience significant fluctuations in customer orders for our products through such cycles. SlowdownsAlthough certain aspects of our business, including the cleaning, coating and analytical services delivered by QGT which also supports the semiconductor chip market are less susceptible to variations in capital expenditures by manufacturers than other aspects of our business, slowdowns in the industries we serve have had, and future slowdowns may also have, a material adverse effect on our operating results. DuringDemand shifts in the industries we serve are rapid and difficult to predict, and we may not be able to anticipate or respond quickly enough to changes in demand. Our ability to increase revenues of our products and services in periods of increasing demand depends, in part, upon our ability to:

mobilize our supply chain in order to maintain component and raw material supply;

optimize the use of our design, engineering and manufacturing capacity in a timely manner;

deliver our products and services to our customers in a timely fashion;

expand, if necessary, our manufacturing, cleaning, coating and analytical services capacity; and

maintain our product and service quality as we increase production.

If we are unable to respond to rapid increases in demand for our products and services on a timely basis, or to manage any corresponding expansion of our manufacturing and service capacity effectively, our customers could divert their purchases of products and services from us to our competitors, which would adversely affect our business.

Our ability to remain profitable and mitigate the impact on our business in periods of decreasing demand fordepends, in part, upon our ability to:

optimize our inventory levels and reduce or cancel orders from our suppliers without compromising our relationships with such suppliers;

reduce our fixed and variable costs through a number of initiatives, which may include reducing our manufacturing workforce;

continue to motivate our employees; and

maintain the prices, quality and delivery cycles of our products and services in order to retain our customers’ business.

The limited visibility we must be able to appropriately alignhave from the majority of our cost structurecustomers of their future orders, combined with prevailing market conditions, effectively manage our supply chain and motivate and retain employees. During periods of increased demand, we must increase manufacturing capacity and inventory to meet customer demands, effectively manage our supply chain and attract, retain and motivate a sufficient number of employees. If the industries we serve experience downturns, or if we are not able to timely and appropriately adapt to the changes in our business environment, our results of operations will be harmed. Also, the cyclical and volatile nature of the industries we serve, make future revenues, results of operations and net cash flows difficult to estimate.


We rely on a small number of original equipment manufacturing (“OEM”) and integrated device manufacturing (“IDM”) customers for a significant portion of our sales,revenues, and any adverse change in our relationships with these customers, including a decision by such customers not to continue to outsource critical subsystems or part cleaning, coating or analytical services to us or to give market share to one of our competitors, would adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Our customers also exert a significant amount of negotiating leverage over us, which may require us to accept lower operating margins, increased liability risks or changes in our operations in order to retain or expand our market share with them.

A relatively small number of OEM customers have historically accounted for a significant portion of our sales,revenues, and we expect this trend to continue. As a group, the respective year’sOur top two customers accounted for 84.4%66.9%, 82.2%76.6% and 77.0%84.4% of our salesrevenues for fiscal years 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively, and we expect that our salesrevenues will continue to be concentrated among a small number of customers. In addition, our customer contracts generally do not require customers to place any orders. Accordingly, the success of our products business depends on OEMs continuing to outsource the manufacturing of critical subsystems to us. Because of the small number of OEMs in the markets we serve, most of which are already our customers, it would be difficult to replace lost revenue resulting from the loss of, or the reduction, cancellation or delay in purchase orders by, any one of these customers, whether due to such customer’s decision to not continue to outsource all or a portion of its critical subsystems for its capital equipment to us, such customer giving market share to our competitors or for other reasons, such as a customer’s bankruptcy or insolvency or decreased demand for such customer’s products. We have in the past lost business from customers who have taken the manufacturing of our products in-house, given market share to our competitors or declared bankruptcy. Further, since our customers generally own the designs and other intellectual property to the products we manufacture, we cannot prevent them from licensing such designs and other intellectual property to our competitors for the manufacturing of such products. If we are unable to replace revenue from customers who determine to take subsystem assembly in-house, give market share to our competitors or from whom we otherwise lose business, such events could have a material adverse impact on our financial position and results of operations.

In addition, consolidationOur Semiconductor Services Business provides part cleaning, coating and analytical expertise, to IDM and OEM customers. Our IDM business is concentrated in a relatively small number of customers, and we compete with in-house capabilities, OEM’s who perform cleaning as part of service contracts, and businesses that provide cleaning, coating and analytical services. The OEM customer profile of our SSB segment has significant overlap with our products business and is subject to risks of market share loss to cleaning, coating and analytical services competitors. The cleaning and analytical process are proprietary to QuantumClean® and ChemTrace®, respectively, and transition to new suppliers may require requalification on the part of the customer.

Consolidation among our customers, or a decision by any one or more of our customers to outsource all or most manufacturing, assembly, cleaning, coating and assemblyanalytical services work to a single equipment manufacturer, may further concentrate our business in a limited number of customers and expose us to increased risks relating to dependence on an even smaller number of customers.

In addition, by virtue ofdue to the size and revenue contribution levels from our largest customers’ sizes, and the significant portion of revenue that we derive from them, as well as the competitive landscape, our customers, they are able to exert significant influence and pricing pressure in the negotiation of our commercial agreements and individual purchase orders and on the conduct of our business with them.orders. Our customers often require reduced prices or other pricing, quality, manufacturing or delivery commitments as a condition to their awarding of market share to us or the placement of orders with us in any given period, whichperiod. This may, among other things, result in reduced operating margins or require capital or other expenditures in order to maintain or expand our market share or require capital or other expenditures.share. Our customers’ negotiating leverage also can result in customer agreements or terms and conditions that may contain significant liability risk to us. For example, some of our customers insistgenerally require that we provide them indemnification against certain liabilities, in our agreements with them, includingwhich may include claims of losses by their own customers causedresulting out of property damages, bodily injuries or deaths, or infringement of intellectual property rights by our products, which may beproducts. Our potential liability arising out of intellectual property infringement claims by any third party is generally uncapped. In some cases, we have determined to self-insureself-insured against liability risk in our customer agreements, meaning that we may be directly responsible for a high magnitude of liability claims by our customers without recourse to insurance proceeds from third-party insurers. Our customers may also pressure us to make other concessions in order to preserve or expand our market share with them, whichthem. Those concessions may harm our business. For example, one or more of our customers may require us to move the manufacturemanufacturing of our products from lower-cost geographies or locations such as China to higher-cost geographies or locations, such as Singapore, that are closer to such customer’s facilities whichSingapore. Such transfer of manufacturing could result in reduced margins and a sub-optimal cost structure. Similarly, customers may prevent us from moving our manufacturing from higher-cost regions to lower-cost regions, while requiring us to reduce our prices. If we are unable to retain and expand our business with our customers on favorable terms, or at all, our business and operating results will be adversely affected orand we may be susceptible to increased liability risk. This additional liability risk which, if realized, maycould have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.


Our dependence on our suppliers may preventus from delivering an acceptable product on a timely basis.

We rely on both single-source and sole-source suppliers, some of whom are relatively small, for many of the components we use in our products.products and services. In addition, our customers often specify components or raw materials of particular suppliers that we must incorporate into our products. Our suppliers aremay be under no long-term obligation to accept or to provide us with components.components or raw materials. As a result, the loss of or failure to perform by any of these suppliers could adversely affect our business and operating results. In addition, the manufacturing of certain components and subsystems is aand the cleaning, coating and analysis of tool parts are complex process.processes. Therefore, if a supplier were unable to provide the volume of supplies, components or raw materials we require on a timely basis and at acceptable prices and quality, we would have to identify and qualify replacements from alternative sources. However, the process of qualifying new suppliers for complex components and raw materials is lengthy and could delay our production or delivery of services, which would adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

We may also experience difficulty in obtaining sufficient supplies of components and raw materials in times of growth in our business. For example, we have in the past experienced shortages in supplies of various components, such as mass flow controllers, valves and regulators, and certain prefabricated parts, such as sheet metal enclosures, used in the manufacture of our products. In addition, one of our competitors manufactures mass flow controllers that may be specified by one or more of our customers. If we are unable to obtain these particular mass flow controllers from our competitor or convince a customer to select alternative mass flow controllers, we may be unable to meet that customer’s requirements, which could result in a loss of market share.

If we, or our suppliers, are unable to procure sufficient quantities of supplies, components or raw materials from suppliers, it could influence decisions by our customers to delay or cancel orders or service contracts and decisions by our vendors to fulfill our purchase orders and, consequently, have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Our inability to successfully manage the implementation of a company-wide enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system could adversely affect our operating results.

We are in the process of implementing a new company-wide ERP system. This process has been and continues to be complex and time-consuming and we expect to incur additional capital outlays and expenses. This ERP system will replace many of our existing operating and financial systems, which is a major undertaking from a financial management and personnel perspective. Should the new ERP system not be implemented successfully throughout all our business units on time and within budget, or if the system does not perform in a satisfactory manner, it could be disruptive and adversely affect our operations, including our potential ability to report accurate, timely and consistent financial results; our ability to purchase supplies, components and raw materials from and pay our suppliers; and our ability to deliver products and services to customers on a timely basis and to collect our receivables from them.

In addition, we have teams leading the implementation of the ERP system at most of our locations. To the extent that these teams or key individuals are not retained through the implementation period, the success of our implementation could be compromised and the expected benefits of the ERP system may not be realized. If the new ERP system is not successfully and fully implemented, it could negatively affect our financial reporting, inventory management and our future sales, profitability and financial condition.


We are subject to order and shipment uncertainties and any significant reductions, cancellations or delays in customer orders could cause our revenue to decline and our operating results to suffer.

Our revenue is difficult to forecast because we generally do not have a material backlog of unfilled orders and because of the short time frame within which we are often required to design, produce or deliver products to our customers. Most of our revenue in any quarter depends on customer orders for our products that we receive and fulfill in the same quarter. We generally do not have long-term purchase orders or contracts that contain minimum purchase commitments from our customers. Instead, we receive non-binding forecasts of the future volume of orders from our customers. Occasionally, we order and build component inventory in advance of the receipt of actual customer orders. Customers may cancel order forecasts, change production quantities from forecasted volumes or delay production for reasons beyond our control. Furthermore, reductions, cancellations or delays in customer order forecasts, which may occur for various reasons, including reduced demand for our customer’s products, customer bankruptcies or customer insolvency, usually occur without penalty to, or compensation from, the customer. Reductions, cancellations or delays in forecasted orders could cause us to hold inventory longer than anticipated, which could reduce our gross profit, restrict our ability to fund our operations and cause us to incur unanticipated reductions or delays in revenue. Moreover, many of the products we manufacture are custom built for our customers and are therefore not fungible with products we sell to other customers. If we do not obtain orders as we anticipate, we could have excess component inventory for a specific product that we would not be able to sell to another customer, likely resulting in inventory write-offs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. In addition, because many of our costs are fixed in the short term, we could experience deterioration in our gross profit and operating margins when our sales volumes decline.

The manufacturing of our products isand the services we provide are highly complex, and if we are not able to manage our manufacturing and procurement process effectively, our business and operating results will suffer.

The manufacturing of our products is a highly complex process that involvesprocess. The services we provide are also highly complex, and dependent upon procuring specialty materials necessary to correctly perform the complex/precise services.  Both the manufacturing of our products and the services we provide involve the integration of multiple components and requiresrequire effective management of our supply chain while meeting our customers’ design-to-delivery cycle time requirements. Through the course of the manufacturing process, our customers may modify design and system configurations in response to changes in their own customers’ requirements. In order to rapidly respond to these modifications and deliver our products to our customers in a timely manner, we must effectively manage our manufacturing and procurement process. If we fail to manage this process effectively, we risk losing customers and damaging our reputation. We may also be subject to liability under our agreements with our customers if we or our suppliers fail to effectively or timely re-configure manufacturing processes or components in response to these modifications or if shipments of our products are delayed, which may lead to product defect or other claims by our customers or cancelled orders. In addition, if we acquire inventory in excess of demand or that does not meet customer specifications, we could incur excess or obsolete inventory charges. These risks are even greater during periods of macroeconomic uncertainty or down cycles in our industry, and as we continue to expand our business beyond gas delivery systems into new subsystems or services with which we have less experience. During periods of economic uncertainty or down cycles in our industry, certain of our suppliers may be forced to reduce or go out of business, which could require us to either procure products from higher-cost suppliers or, if no additional suppliers exist, reconfigure the design and manufacture of our products. This could limit our growth and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

We may not be ableheld our customers’ inventories on our premises and any significant damage or loss to respond quickly enoughthese inventories could cause our operating results to changes in demand forsuffer.

In connection with our products.

Demand shifts incleaning business, we face a number of risks associated with customer inventory being held on our property, including the industries we serve are rapid and difficultrisk of loss or mishandling of, or other damage to, predict, and we may not be able to anticipate or respond quickly enough to changes in demand. Our ability to increase salescustomer inventory, any of which could harm our products in periods of increasing demand depends, in part, upon our ability to:

mobilize our supply chain in order to maintain component and raw material supply;

optimize the use of our design, engineering and manufacturing capacity in a timely manner;

deliver our products to our customers in a timely fashion;

expand, if necessary, our manufacturing capacity; and

maintain our product quality as we increase production.


If we are unable to respond to rapid increases in demand for our products on a timely basis or to manage any corresponding expansion of our manufacturing capacity effectively, our customers could increase their purchases from our competitors, which wouldreputation, adversely affect our business.

Our abilitybusiness, and otherwise expose us to remain profitable and mitigate the impact on our business in periods of decreasing demand depends, in part, upon our ability to:

optimize our inventory levels and reduceincreased liabilities or cancel orders to our suppliers without compromising our relationships with such suppliers;losses.

reduce our variable costs through a reduction of our manufacturing workforce;

continue to motivate our employees; and

maintain the prices, quality and delivery cycles of our products in order to retain our customers’ business.

Our results of operations, financial position and cash flows may suffer if we do not effectively manage our inventory.

Inventory is typicallyone of the largest assetassets on our balance sheet, representing 42.0%16.9% of our total assets as of December 29, 2017.27, 2019.  We must manage our inventory of raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods effectively to meet changing customer requirements, while keeping inventory costs down and maintaining or improving gross margins.


Historically, the industries we serve (in particular the semiconductor capital equipment industry) have been highly cyclical, which makes accurately forecasting customers’ product needs difficult.  Although we seek to maintain sufficient inventory levels of materials to guard against interruptions in supply and to meet our customers’ needs, we may experience shortages of certain key materials, particularly in times of high industry demand.  We also face long lead times from our suppliers, which may be longer than the lead times provided to us by our customers.  If we underestimate customer demand or if insufficient manufacturing capacity or raw materials are available, we may have to forego sales opportunities, lose market share and damage our customer relationships.

In the event we overestimate customer demand, we may allocate resources to manufacturing products that we may not be able to sell. As a result, we could hold excess or obsolete inventory, which would reduce our profit margins and adversely affect our financial results. Some of our products have in the past and may in the future become obsolete while in inventory due to changing customer specifications, or become excess inventory due to decreased demand for our products and an inability to sell the inventory within a foreseeable period. Furthermore, our customers may be able to cancel orders on short notice. This could result in charges that reduce our gross profit and gross margin. Furthermore, if market prices drop below the prices at which we value inventory, we would need to take a charge for a reduction in inventory values in accordance with the lower of cost or net realizable value valuation rule.applicable accounting rules. Any future unexpected changes in demand or increases in costs of production that cause us to take additional charges for un-saleable, obsolete or excess inventory, or to reduce inventory values, would adversely affect our results of operations.

We hold inventory at our various manufacturing sites globally and many of these sites have more than one inventory warehouse. Successfully managing our inventory is dependent upon our information technology systems and internal controls. We rely upon such information technology systems and internal controls to accurately and timely manage, store and replenish inventory, complete and track customer orders, coordinate sales activities across all of our products and maintain and report vital data and information. A disruption in our information technology systems or a failure of our internal controls (arising from, for example, system capacity limits from unexpected or prolonged increases in our volume of business, outages or delays in our service) could result in delays or disruptions in receiving inventory and supplies or filling customer orders, incorrect inventory counts, over or under stocking or loss of inventory and adversely affect our business, customer servicerelationships and relationships.results of operations.  In particular, our largest customer requires that certain of our products are manufactured and shipped out of our Singapore facility.  Recent highHigh levels of customer demand at such facility havein fiscal year 2017 created substantial strain on our processes, internal controls and information technology systems.  There can be no assurance that such delays, failures or disruptions will not have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.


Our customers require our products to undergo a lengthy and expensive qualification process. If we are unsuccessful or delayed in qualifying any of our products with a customer, our results of operations and financial condition could suffer.

We have had to qualify, and are required to maintain our status, as a supplier for each of our customers. This is often a lengthy process that involves the inspection and approval by a customer of our engineering, documentation, manufacturing and quality control procedures before that customer will place volume orders. Our ability to lessen the adverse effect of any loss of, or reduction in sales to, an existing customer through the rapid addition of one or more new customers is limited because of these qualification requirements. Consequently, the risk that our business, operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected by the loss of, or any reduction in orders by, any of our significant customers is increased. Moreover, if we lose our existing status as a qualified supplier to any of our customers, such customer could cancel its orders from us or otherwise terminate its relationship with us, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our Acquisitions could result in operating and integration difficulties, dilution, margin deterioration, diversion of management’s attention, and other consequences that may adversely impact our business and results of operations.

We have made, and may in the future make, acquisitions of, or significant investments in, businesses that offer complementary products, services, technologies or market access. We expect that management will evaluate potential strategic transactions regularly with its advisors and our board of directors in the ordinary course of business. We may not be successful in negotiating the terms of potential acquisitions or financing potential acquisitions, and our due diligence may fail to identify all of the problems, liabilities or other challenges associated with an acquired business, product or technology, including issues related to intellectual property, product quality or product architecture, regulatory compliance practices, revenue recognition or other accounting practices or employee or customer retention issues. In addition, we may not be successful in effectively integrating the acquired business, product or technology into our existing business and operations. The areas where we face risks include:

management of a larger, more complex and capital intensive, combined business, including integrating supply and distribution channels, computer and accounting systems, and other aspects of operations;


exposure to new operational risks, rules, regulations, worker expectations, customs and practices to the extent acquired businesses are located in regions where UCT has not historically conducted business;

inability to successfully managecomplete proposed transactions due to the implementationfailure to obtain regulatory or other approvals, litigation or other disputes, and any ensuing obligation to pay a termination fee;

deterioration of gross margins due to the acquired company having the same customer base as us, resulting in reduced pricing leverage;

the failure to realize expected returns from acquired businesses;

reductions in cash balances or increases in debt obligations to finance the acquisition, which reduce the availability of cash flow for general corporate or other purposes;

integration of the capabilities of the acquired businesses while maintaining focus on providing consistently high quality products;

incorporation of different financial and reporting controls, processes, systems and technologies into our existing business environment;

o

Based on our evaluation under the COSO framework as further described under “Item 9A – Controls and Procedures,” our management concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 27, 2019 due to material weaknesses attributable to deficiencies in the design and implementation of business process controls and information technology general controls relating to all relevant accounts and cycles within our Semiconductor Services Business (SSB) segment.

unforeseen liabilities, expenses, or other losses associated with the acquisitions for which we do not have recourse under their respective agreements;

the risk of litigation or claims associated with a company-wide enterpriseproposed or completed transaction;

inadequacy or ineffectiveness of an acquired company’s internal financial controls, disclosure controls and procedures, or environmental, health and safety, anti-corruption, human resource planning (“ERP”) systemor other policies or practices;

performance shortfalls as a result of the diversion of management’s attention from the Company’s operations;

cultural challenges associated with integrating employees from the acquired business into our organization, and incentivization and retention of employees from the businesses we acquire; and

difficulties associated with the retention and transition of new customers and partners into our existing business.

Our failure to address these risks or other problems encountered in connection with our past or future acquisitions and investments could cause us to fail to realize the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions or investments, incur unanticipated liabilities and substantial costs, and materially harm our business generally.

Our acquisitions could also result in dilutive issuances of our equity securities, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities, or amortization expenses, impairment charges and restructuring charges, any of which could harm our financial condition. Also, the anticipated benefits or value of our acquisitions or investments may not materialize. Even if an acquisition or other investment is not completed, we may divert significant management time and effort and incur significant financial cost in evaluating such acquisition or investment, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Furthermore, due to prevailing conditions in the credit market and our existing leverage, the financing of any such acquisition may be difficult to obtain if at all, and the terms of any such financing may not be favorable.

Failure to realize the benefits expected from the QGT and DMS acquisitions could adversely affect the value of our operating results.common stock.

We areAlthough we expect significant benefits to result from the QGT and DMS acquisitions, there can be no assurance that we will actually realize them. Achieving these benefits will depend, in the process of implementing a new Company-wide ERP system. This process has beenpart, on our ability to integrate QGT's and continues toDMS’ businesses successfully and efficiently. The challenges involved in these integrations, which will be complex and time-consumingtime consuming, include the following: preserving customer and other important relationships of QGT and DMS; managing effectively a new business and competing in a new industry for QGT; consolidating and integrating information technology, finance, general and administrative infrastructures; coordinating sales and marketing efforts to effectively position our capabilities; coordinating and integrating operations in countries in which we expect to incur additional expenses. This ERP systemhave not previously operated; and integrating employees and related HR systems and benefits, maintaining employee morale and retaining key employees. The successful integration of the QGT and DMS businesses will replace manyrequire significant management attention, and may divert the attention of our existing operating and financial systems, which is a major undertakingmanagement from a financial management and personnel perspective. Should the new ERP system not be implemented successfully throughout all our business units and within budgetoperational issues.


Based on our evaluation under the COSO framework as further described under “Item 9A – Controls and on time, or if the system doesProcedures,” our management concluded that we did not perform in a satisfactory manner, it could be disruptive and adversely affect our operations, including our potential abilitymaintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 27, 2019 due to report accurate, timely and consistent financial results; our abilitymaterial weaknesses attributable to purchase raw material from and pay our suppliers; and our ability to deliver products to customers on a timely basis and to collect our receivables from them. Furthermore, this new ERP system is intended to be implemented beginningdeficiencies in the third quarterdesign and implementation of 2018business process controls and finalized byinformation technology general controls relating to all relevant accounts and cycles within our Semiconductor Services Business (SSB) segment.

If we do not successfully manage these issues and the end of fiscal year 2019. Once operational,other challenges inherent in integrating an acquired business, we expect amortization of our capitalized ERP costs will be significant and may not be offset byachieve the efficiencies we expect this system to produce for the Company.

In addition, we have put teams together who are leading the implementation of the ERP system at all of our locations. To the extent that these teams or key individuals are not retained through the implementation period, the success of our implementation could be compromised and the expectedanticipated benefits of the ERP system may not be realized. If the new ERP system is not successfully implemented, it could negatively affect our financial reportingQGT and inventory managementDMS acquisitions and our future sales, profitabilityrevenue, expenses, operating results, financial condition and financial condition.stock price could be materially adversely affected.

We are exposed to risks associated with volatility in the global economy.

We rely to a significant extent on OEM customers, whose business, in turn, depends largely on consumer spending and capital expenditures by businesses. Uncertainty regarding the global economy may pose challenges to our business. Economic uncertainty may exacerbate negative trends in business and consumer spending and may cause certain of our customers to push out, cancel, or refrain from placing orders for products or services, which may reduce sales and materially affect our results of operations and financial condition. Inflationary trends could also have an impact on labor costs and component costs, reducing our margins. Difficulties in obtaining capital, uncertain market conditions, or reduced profitability may also cause some customers to scale back operations, exit businesses, merge with other manufacturers, or file for bankruptcy protection and potentially cease operations, leading to customers’ reduced research and development funding and/or capital expenditures and, in turn, lower orders from our customers and/or additional slow moving or obsolete inventory or bad debt expense for us. These conditions may also similarly affect key suppliers, which could impair their ability to deliver partssupplies, components or raw materials and result in delays for our products or services or require us to either procure productssupplies, components or raw materials from higher-cost suppliers, or if no additional suppliers exist, to reconfigure the design and manufacture of our products or services, and we may be unable to fulfill customer orders.

Significant developments stemming from the recent change in the U.S. administration could have a material adverse effect on us.

On January 20, 2017, a new president of the United States was inaugurated as the president of the United States. While it is still uncertain at this time how the new administrationEscalating trade tensions and the resultsadoption or expansion of tariffs and trade restrictions could negatively impact us.

International trade tensions or trade wars, as well as other elections could


affect changes in social, political, regulatory and economic conditions or laws and policies, the Presidentcould have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. The U.S. Government has expressed apprehension towards existing trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement, signed an executive order announcing his plan to withdraw the United States from the Trans-Pacific Partnership in favor of bilateral trade negotiations with the member countries, and has raised the possibility of imposing significant increases onrecently announced tariffs on goodssteel and aluminum products and materials imported into the United States, includingStates. The U.S. Government has also implemented or announced plans to impose tariffs on a wide-range of goods imported from China, where we and our customers have significant operations. ChangesAdditionally, various countries and economic regions have announced plans or intentions to impose retaliatory tariffs on a wide-range of products they import from the U.S., and there is a risk that a broader trade conflict could ensue. These newly imposed or threatened U.S. tariffs and retaliatory tariffs could have the negative effect of increasing the cost of materials for our products, which could result in our products becoming less competitive or generating lower margins. This has the potential to impact global trade and economic conditions in many of the regions where we do business.

The United Kingdom’s (UK) pending withdrawal from the European Union (EU), commonly referred to as “Brexit,” has created significant uncertainty concerning the future relationship between the UK and the EU and the impact on global markets. It is unclear what financial, trade, regulatory and legal implications the withdrawal of the UK from the EU will have and how such withdrawal will affect us. Furthermore, the announcement of Brexit caused significant volatility in global stock markets and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, and the pending withdrawal of the UK from the EU may also adversely affect European and global economic and market conditions, which may cause our customers to closely monitor their costs and reduce their spending budgets. Any of these effects of Brexit, among others, could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Other changes in U.S. or international social, political, regulatory and economic conditions or laws and policies governing U.S. tax laws, foreign trade, manufacturing, and development and investment in the countries where we or our customers operate could also adversely affect our operating results and our business.


We have significant existing indebtedness; the restrictive covenants under our credit agreement or other limitations on financing may limit our ability to expand or pursue our business strategy or make capital expenditures; if we are forced to pay some or all of our indebtedness prior to its maturity, our financial position could be severely and adversely affected.

We have total debt as of December 29, 2017, gross27, 2019 of capitalized292.2 million. Such debt is composed of a $300.0 million term loan costs of $0.2 million, of $52.4 millionoutstanding under our Credit Agreement with East WestBarclays Bank less debt costs of $9.7 million and City National Bank, including $9.9 outstanding under our term loan and $39.9 outstanding under our revolving loan (with $0.1 million of available borrowings) and $2.7$1.9 million under aFDS’s revolving credit facility million held by Miconex, in the Czech Republic.

Our indebtedness could have adverse consequences including:

risk associated with any inability to satisfy debt obligations;

athe portion of our cash flows that may have tomust be dedicated to interest and principal payments and maywill not be available for operations, working capital, capital expenditures, expansion, acquisitions or general corporate or other purposes; and

impairing our ability to obtain additional financing in the future, if needed.

If we are unable to meet our debt obligations as they come due, we could be forced to restructure or refinance such obligations, seek additional equity financing or sell assets, which we may not be able to do on satisfactory terms, or at all. If we determine it is necessary to seek additional funding for any reason, we may not be able to obtain such funding or, if funding is available, may not be able to obtain it on acceptable terms.

Our Credit Agreement contains certain covenants that restrict our ability to take certain actions, including our ability to incur additional debt, including guarantees, or create liens, as well asmake certain investments, engage in transactions with affiliates and engage in certain mergers and acquisitions.

Our Credit Agreement requires us to maintain certain financial covenants, including compliance with a maximum consolidated total gross leverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge ratio and a minimum cash balance.coverage ratio. Our failure to comply with these covenants could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of all of our indebtedness, which would materially adversely affect our financial health if we are unable to access sufficient funds to repay all of the outstanding amounts.

As long as our indebtedness remains outstanding, the restrictive covenants and mandatory prepayment provisions could impair our ability to expand or pursue our business strategies or obtain additional funding.

We may not be able to fund our future capital requirements or strategic acquisitions from our operations, and financing from other sources may not be available on favorable terms or at all.

We made capital expenditures of approximately $18.5$25.7 million and $7.8$29.2 million for fiscal year 2017years 2019 and 2016,2018, respectively, which primarily related to our ERP system implementation and to investment in our manufacturing facilities in the United States, China, Singapore and Singapore.South Korea. The amount of our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:

the cost required to ensure appropriate IT systems;

the cost required to ensure access to adequate manufacturing capacity;


the timing and extent of spending to support product development efforts;

the timing and extent of spending to support product development efforts;

the timing of introductions of new products and enhancements to existing products;

the timing, size and availability of strategic transactions we may enter into;

the cost required to integrate our acquisitions into our business, including into our enterprise resource planningERP system;

changing manufacturing capabilities to meet new or increased customer requirements; and

market acceptance of our products.products; and

an ability to generate sufficient cash flow from our operating activities.


We are seekingregularly consider opportunities for strategic acquisitions, whichacquisitions. On April 15, 2019, we acquired substantially all of the assets of DMS for approximately $29.9 million in cash, subject to certain post-closing adjustments, and we may require substantial, or even more financing than we are ablepay up to put$12.5 million in place, or more expensive financing than may be desirable.additional cash earn-out if the combined weldment business after the acquisition achieves certain gross profit and gross margin targets for the twelve months ending June 26, 2020. We drew $15.0 million from our available Revolving Credit Facility to finance this acquisition.

Given our existing indebtedness, limited availability under our new revolving line of credit and the potential tax effects of repatriating foreign cash or other factors, inIn order to finance our capital expenditures or any future strategic acquisitions, we may need to raise additional funds through public or private equity or debt financing, but such financing may not be available on terms satisfactory to us, or at all. Access to capital markets has, in the past, been unavailable to companies such as ours. In addition, equity financings could be dilutive to holders of our common stock, and debt financings would likely involve additional covenants that restrict our business operations. Any potential strategic acquisition or significant capital expenditure may also require the consent of our existing lenders. If we cannot raise funds on acceptable terms if and when needed, we may not be able to develop or enhance our products, take advantage of future opportunities, including potential acquisitions, grow our business or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements, any of which could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our quarterly revenue and operating results could fluctuate significantly from period to period, and this may cause volatility in our common stock price.

Our quarterly revenue and operating results, including our gross margin, have fluctuated significantly in the past, and we expect them to continue to fluctuate in the future for a variety of reasons which may include:

demand for and market acceptance of our products and services as a result of the cyclical nature of the industries we serve or otherwise, often resulting in reduced sales during industry downturns and increased sales during periods of industry recovery or growth;

overall economic conditions;

changes in the timing and size of orders by our customers;

loss of business from one or more significant customers due to strategic decisions by our customers to terminate their outsourcing relationship with us or give market share to our competitors, or due to decreased demand for our customers’ products by end customers;

strategic consolidation by our customers;

cancellations and postponements of previously placed orders;

pricing pressure from either our competitors or our customers, resulting in the reduction of our product or service prices, margins or loss of market share;

disruptions or delays in the manufacturing of our products or in the supply of components or raw materials that are incorporated into or used to manufacture our products or provide our services, thereby causing us to delay the shipment of products;

decreased margins for several or more quarters following the introduction of new products or services, especially as we introduce new subsystems;

delays in ramp-up in production, low yields or other problems experienced at our manufacturing facilities in China or Singapore;

changes in design-to-delivery cycle times;


inability to reduce our costs quickly in step with reductions in our prices or in response to decreased demand for our products;

inability to reduce our costs quickly in step with reductions in our prices or in response to decreased demand for our products;

changes in our mix of products sold;sold or services;

write-offs of excess or obsolete inventory due to a customer’s bankruptcy or insolvency;

one-time expenses or charges associated with failed acquisition negotiations or completed acquisitions;

inability to control our operating costs consistent with target levels;


announcements by our competitors of new products, services or technological innovations, which may, among other things, render our products less competitive; and

announcements by our competitors of new products, services or technological innovations, which may, among other things, render our products less competitive; and

geographic mix of customer orders or worldwide earnings.

As a result of the foregoing, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our revenue and operating results may not be meaningful and that these comparisons may not be an accurate indicator of our future performance. Changes in the timing or terms of a small number of transactions could disproportionately affect our operating results in any particular quarter. Moreover, our operating results in one or more future quarters may fail to meet our guidance or the expectations of securities analysts or investors. If this occurs, we would expect to experience an immediate and significant decline in the trading price of our common stock.

We have established and, as markets will allow,circumstances may require, intend to expand our operations in Asia and Europe,globally, which exposes us to risks associated with operating in foreign countries.

We generated approximately 53.6%52.1% and 48.0%56.7% of our salesrevenues in international markets for fiscal years 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. Depending on market conditions, we intend to further expand our operations in Asia and Europe, principallyEurope. Through our acquisition of QGT, we expanded our operations to several regions outside of the United States, including in South Korea, Taiwan, Ireland, Scotland and Israel, and increased our operations in China and Singapore and the Czech Republic. In addition, through our acquisition of AIT, we acquired a manufacturing facility in Cebu, Philippines.Singapore. The carrying amount of our fixed assets in Asia and Europe were $10.3$81.4 million and $1.6$7.5 million, respectively as of December 29, 2017.27, 2019.

We are exposed to political, economic, legal and other risks associated with operating in Asia and Europe, including:

foreign currency exchange fluctuations;

political, civil and economic instability;

restrictive governmental actions, such as restrictions on the transfer or repatriation of funds and foreign investments and trade protection measures, including increasing protectionism, import/export restrictions, import/export duties and quotas, trade sanctions and customs duties and tariffs, all of which could increase under the current or future U.S. administration;

uncertainty regarding social, political and other barriers;trade policies in the United States and abroad;

timing and availability of export licenses;

disruptions to our and our customers’ operations due to increased risk of outbreak of diseases, such as SARS and avian flu;diseases;

disruptions in operations due to China’s developing domestic infrastructure, including transportation and energy;

���

disruptions in operations due to China’s developing domestic infrastructure, including transportation and energy;

difficulties in developing relationships with local suppliers;


difficulties in attracting new international customers;

difficulties in attracting new international customers;

difficulties in conducting due diligence with respect to business partners in certain international markets;

difficulties in accounts receivable collections;

difficulties in staffing and managing distant international subsidiarysubsidiaries and branch operations;

the burden of complying with foreign and international laws and treaties;

legal systems potentially subject to undue influence or corruption;

difficulties in transferring funds to other geographic locations; and

potentially adverse tax consequences, including restrictions on the repatriation of earnings to the United States.


Negative or uncertain global conditions could prevent us from accurately forecasting demand for our products and services which could adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, due to generally lower labor and materials costs in the Asian markets in which we currently operate, a shift in the mix of orders from our customers away from such Asian markets or from low cost Asian markets, such as China, to higher cost Asian markets, such as Singapore, could adversely affect our operating margins.

Our operations in Asia and Europe are also subject us to U.S. laws governing the export of equipment. These laws are complex and require us to obtain clearances for the export to Asia and Europe of certain equipment. We may fail to comply with these laws and regulations, which could require us to cease the export of certain equipment and expose us to fines or penalties.

Over the past several years, the Chinese government has pursued economic reform policies, including the encouragement of private economic activity and greater economic decentralization.activity. The Chinese government may not continue these policies or may significantly alter them to our detriment from time to time without notice. Changes in laws and regulations or their interpretation, the imposition of confiscatory taxation policies, new restrictions on currency conversion or limitations on sources of supply could materially and adversely affect our Chinese operations, which could result in the partial or total loss of our investment in that country and materially and adversely affect our future operating results.

WeA significant legal risk associated with conducting business internationally is compliance with the various and differing laws and regulations, including anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws and regulations, of the countries in which we do business, antitrust and competition laws, data privacy laws and export regulations. In addition, the laws in various countries are subject to orderconstantly evolving and shipment uncertaintiesmay, in some cases, conflict with each other. Although our Code of Business Conduct and any significant reductions, cancellations or delays in customer orders could causeEthics and other policies prohibit us, our revenue to declineemployees and our operating results to suffer.

Our revenue is difficult to forecast because we generally do not have a material backlog of unfilled orders and because of the short time frame within which we are often required to design, produce and deliver products to our customers. Mostagents from engaging in unethical business practices, there can be no assurance that all of our revenueemployees or agents will refrain from acting in any quarter depends on customer orders forviolation of our products that we receiverelated anti-corruption policies and fulfill in the same quarter. We do not have long-term purchase orders or contracts that contain minimum purchase commitments from our customers. Instead, we receive non-binding forecasts of the future volume of orders from our customers. Occasionally, we order and build component inventory in advance of the receipt of actual customer orders. Customers may cancel order forecasts, change production quantities from forecasted volumes or delay production for reasons beyond our control. Furthermore, reductions, cancellations or delays in customer order forecasts, which may occur for various reasons, including reduced demand for our customer’s products, customer bankruptcies or customer insolvency, usually occur without penalty to, or compensation from, the customer. Reductions, cancellations or delays in forecasted orders could cause us to hold inventory longer than anticipated, which could reduce our gross profit, restrict our ability to fund our operations and cause us to incur unanticipated reductions or delays in revenue. Moreover, most of the products we manufacture are custom built for our customers and are therefore not fungible with products we sell to other customers. If we do not obtain orders as we anticipate, we could have excess component inventory for a specific product that we would not be able to sell to another customer, likely resulting in inventory write-offs, whichprocedures. Any such violation could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Business practices in Asia may entail greater risk and dependence upon the personal relationships of senior management than is common in North America, and therefore some of our agreements with other parties in South Korea and China could be difficult or impossible to enforce.

Through our acquisition of QGT, we have expanded our business financial conditionactivities in Asia. The business culture in parts of Asia is, in some respects, different from the business cultures in Western countries. Personal relationships among business principals of companies and operating results.business entities in Asia are very significant in their business cultures. In some cases, because so much reliance is based upon personal relationships, written contracts among businesses in Asia may be less detailed and specific than is commonly accepted for similar written agreements in Western countries. In some cases, material terms of an understanding are not contained in the written agreement but exist only as oral agreements. In addition, becausein contrast to the Western business environment where a written agreement specifically defines the terms, rights and obligations of the parties in a legally-binding and enforceable manner, the parties to a written agreement in Asia may view that agreement more as a starting point for an ongoing business relationship which will evolve and undergo ongoing modification over time. As a result, any contractual arrangements we enter into with a counterparty in Asia may be more difficult to enforce.

We could be adversely affected by risks associated with joint ventures, including those in the Asian markets.

From time to time, we may seek to expand our business through investments in joint ventures with complementary businesses, technologies, services or products, subject to our business plans and management’s ability to identify, acquire and develop suitable investments or acquisition targets in both new and existing market categories and geographic markets. Our investments in joint ventures are subject to a number of risks, including many of those described for acquisitions above under Risk Factors—“Acquisitions could result in operating and integration difficulties, dilution, margin deterioration, diversion of management’s attention, and other consequences that may adversely impact our costsbusiness and results of operations.”. In particular, at the closing of the QGT acquisition, we indirectly became a party to QGT’s joint venture with Cinos Co., Ltd. (“Cinos Korea”) in South Korea and Cinos Xi’an in China, which is our first experience with a joint venture. There can be no assurances that the joint ventures will be successful. The success of the joint ventures will require significant management and capital resources and there can be no assurances that such resources will be available. Operations at the joint ventures could expose us to


increased risks inherent in such activities, such as protection of our intellectual property, economic and political stability, labor matters, language and cultural differences; contractual enforcement issues; and the need to manage product development, operations and sales activities that are fixedlocated a long distance from our headquarters and have historically been centralized with local management. In addition, from time to time in the short term, we could experience deteriorationfuture, our joint venture partners may have economic or business interests or goals that are different from ours. Furthermore, our joint venture with Cinos Korea will require us to make purchases of equity from time to time up to specified amounts. If each joint venture business does not progress according to our plans and anticipated timing, our investment in our gross profit and operating margins when our production volumes decline.the joint ventures may not be successful.


The industries in which we participate are highly competitive and rapidly evolving, and if we are unable to compete effectively, our operating results will be harmed.

We face intense competition from subsystem and component manufacturers in the industries we serve. Increased competition has in the past resulted, and could in the future result, in price reductions, reduced gross margins or loss of market share, any of which would harm our operating results. We are subject to significant pricing pressure as we attempt to maintain and increase market share with our existing customers. Competitors may offer reduced prices or introduce new products for the markets currently served by our products. These products may have better performance, lower prices and achieve broader market acceptance than our products. Further, OEMs typically own the design rights to their products and may provide these designs to other subsystem manufacturers. If our competitors obtain proprietary rights to these designs such that we are unable to obtain the designs necessary to manufacture products for our OEM customers, our business, financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected. The cleaning and analytical process are proprietary to QuantumClean® and ChemTrace®, respectively, and are subject to less risk from cleaning, coating and analytics competitors. OEMs are looking to increase their maintenance services and could create proprietary cleaning processes with competitors, limiting our ability to compete for future business.

Our competitors may have greater financial, technical, manufacturing and marketing resources than we do. As a result, they may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements, devote greater resources to the development, promotion, sale and support of their products and services, and reduce prices to increase market share. Moreover, there may be merger and acquisition activityactivities among our competitors and potential competitors that may provide our competitors and potential competitors an advantage over us by enabling them to expand their product offerings and service capabilities to meet a broader range of customer needs. Further, if one of our customers develops or acquires the internal capability to develop and produce critical subsystems that we produce, or cleaning, coating and analytical services we provide, the loss of that customer could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. The introduction of new technologies and new market entrants may also increase competitive pressures.

If our new products are not accepted by OEMs or other customers or if we are unable to obtain historical margins on our new products, our operating results would be adversely impacted.

We design, develop and market critical subsystems and proprietary cleaning, coating and analytical services to OEMs, IDMs and other customers. The introduction of new products and processes is inherently risky because it is difficult to foresee the adoption of new standards, coordinate our technical personnel and strategic relationships and win acceptance of new products by OEMs, IDMs and other customers. We may not be able to recoup design and development expenditures if our new products are not accepted by OEMs, IDMs or other customers. Newly introduced products typically carry lower gross margins than existing products for several or more quarters following their introduction. If any of our new systems or subsystems are not successful in the market, or if we are unable to obtain gross margins on new products that are similar to the gross margins we have historically achieved, our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.


Our business may be adversely affected by information technology, disruptions, including by impairing our ability to effectively deliver our products or services, which could cause us to lose customers and harm our results of operations.

The manufacture and delivery of our products, the provision of our services and our financial reporting depends on the continuing operation of our technology infrastructure and systems, particularly our data center located in California. Any damage to or failure of our systems could result in interruptions in our ability to manufacture or deliver products or services on agreed upon lead times, or at all, on a local or worldwide basis, or adversely affect our impact to accurately and timely report our financial results. Interruptions could reduce our sales and profits, and our reputation could be damaged if people believe our systems are unreliable. Our systems and operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption from earthquakes, terrorist attacks, floods, fires, power loss, hardware or software failures, telecommunications failures, cybersecurity attacks, and similar events. TheSome of the critical components of theour system are not redundant and we currently do not have a backup data center. Accordingly, the risk associated with such events beyond our control is heightened.

Cybersecurity attacks, in particular, are evolving and include, but are not limited to, malicious software, attempts to gain unauthorized access to data, and other electronic security breaches that could lead to disruptions in systems, unauthorized release of confidential or otherwise protected information and corruption of data (our own or that of third parties). Although we have adopted certain measures to mitigate potential risks to our systems from information technology-related disruptions, given the unpredictability of the timing, nature and scope of such disruptions, we could


potentially be subject to production downtimes, operational delays, other detrimental impacts on our operations or ability to provide products and services to our customers, the compromising of confidential or otherwise protected information, misappropriation, destruction or corruption of data, security breaches, other manipulation or improper use of our systems or networks, financial losses from remedial actions, loss of business or potential liability, and/or damage to our reputation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

If we experience frequent or persistent system failures, the attractiveness of our products or services to customers could be permanently harmed. Any steps we take to increase the reliability and redundancy of our systems may be expensive, reduce our operating margin and may not be successful in reducing the frequency or duration of unscheduled interruptions.

Acquisitions could result in operating and integration difficulties, dilution, margin deterioration, diversion of management’s attention, and other consequences that may adversely impact our business and results of operations.

We have made, and may in the future make, acquisitions of, or significant investments in, businesses that offer complementary products, services, technologies or market access. We expect that management will evaluate potential strategic transactions regularly with its advisors and our board of directors in the ordinary course of business. We may not be successful in negotiating the terms of potential acquisitions or financing potential acquisitions, and our due diligence may fail to identify all of the problems, liabilities or other challenges associated with an acquired business, product or technology, including issues related to intellectual property, product quality or product architecture, regulatory compliance practices, revenue recognition or other accounting practices or employee or customer retention issues. In addition, we may not be successful in effectively integrating the acquired business, product or technology into our existing business and operations. The areas where we face risks include:

Management of the larger, more complex, combined business, including integrating supply and distribution channels, computer and accounting systems, and other aspects of operations;

Deterioration of gross margins due to the acquisition of the same customer base resulting in reduced pricing leverage;

Integration of the capabilities of the acquired businesses while maintaining focus on providing consistently high quality products;

Incorporation of different financial and reporting controls, processes, systems and technologies into our existing business environment;

Unknown liabilities and unforeseen expenses, delays or regulatory conditions associated with the acquisitions for which we do not have recourse under their respective agreements;

Performance shortfalls as a result of the diversion of management’s attention from the company’s operations;

Cultural challenges associated with integrating employees from the acquired business into our organization, and retention of employees from the businesses we acquire;

Retention of customers and partners of acquired business; and/or

Difficulties associated with the transition of customers into our existing business.

Our failure to address these risks or other problems encountered in connection with our past or future acquisitions and investments could cause us to fail to realize the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions or investments, incur unanticipated liabilities and substantial costs, and materially harm our business generally.


Our acquisitions could also result in dilutive issuances of our equity securities, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities, or amortization expenses, impairment charges and restructuring charges, any of which could harm our financial condition. Also, the anticipated benefits or value of our acquisitions or investments may not materialize. Even if an acquisition or other investment is not completed, we may divert significant management time and effort and financial cost in evaluating such acquisition or investment, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Furthermore, due to limited liquidity in the credit market and our existing leverage, the financing of any such acquisition may be difficult to obtain, and the terms of such financing may not be favorable.

If we were required to write downimpair all or part of our goodwill and/or our acquired intangible assets, our net income and net worth could be materially adversely affected.

We had $85.2$171.1 million of goodwill recorded on our consolidated balance sheetConsolidated Balance Sheet as of December 29, 2017.27, 2019. Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair market value of net tangible and finite lived, identifiable intangible assets acquired in business combinations. If our market capitalization drops significantly below the amount of net equity recorded on our balance sheet, it could indicate a decline in our value and would require us to further evaluate whether our goodwill has been impaired. During the fourth quarter of each year, we perform an annual review of our goodwill and acquired intangible assets to determine if it hasthey have become impaired, in which casehowever, we would write down the impaired portion of our goodwill. We also evaluate goodwill and acquired intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If we were required to write downimpair all or a significant part of our goodwill and/or our acquired intangible assets, our financial results and net worth could be materially adversely affected.

Our business is largely dependent on the know-how of our employees, and we generally do not have an intellectual property position that is protected by patents.

Our business is largely dependent upon our design, engineering, manufacturing, chemical processing, analytical and testing know-how. We rely on a combination of trade secrets and contractual confidentiality provisions and, to a much lesser extent, patents, copyrights and trademarks to protect our proprietary rights. Confidentiality agreements with our employees and others may not adequately prevent disclosure of trade secrets and other proprietary information. Accordingly, our intellectual property position is more vulnerable than it would be if it were protected primarily by patents. If we fail to protect our proprietary rights successfully, our competitive position could suffer, which could harm our operating results. We may be required to spend significant resources to monitor and protect our proprietary rights, and, in the event infringement or breach of our proprietary rights occurs, our competitive position in the market may be harmed. In addition, competitors may design around our technology or develop competing technologies and know-how. Further, since our customers generally own the designs and other intellectual property to the products we manufacture, we cannot prevent them from licensing such designs and other intellectual property to our competitors for the manufacture of such products.


Third parties have claimed and may in the future claim we are infringing their intellectual property, which could subject us to litigation or licensing expenses, and we may be prevented from selling our products if any such claims prove successful.

We have in the past and may in the future receive claims that our products, processes or technologies infringe the patents or other proprietary rights of third parties. In addition, we may be unaware of intellectual property rights of others that may be applicable to our products. Any litigation regarding our patents or other intellectual property could be costly and time-consuming and divert the attention of our management and key personnel from our business operations, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. The complexity of the technology involved in our products and the uncertainty of intellectual property litigation increase these risks. Claims of intellectual property infringement may also require us to enter into costly license agreements. However, we may not be able to obtain licenses on terms acceptable to us, or at all. We also may be subject to significant damages or injunctions against the development, manufacture and sale of certain of our products if any such claims prove successful. We also rely on design specifications and other intellectual property of our customers in the manufacture of products for such customers. While our customer agreements generally provide for indemnification of us by our customers if we are subjected to litigation for third-party claims of infringement of such customer intellectual property, such indemnification provisions may not be sufficient to fully protect us from such claims, or our customers may breach such indemnification obligations to us, which could result in costly litigation to defend against such claims or enforce our contractual rights to such indemnification.


If we do not keep pace with developments in the industries we serve and with technological innovation generally, our products may not be competitive.

Rapid technological innovation in the markets we serve requires us to anticipate and respond quickly to evolving customer requirements and could render our current product or service offerings and technology obsolete. Technological innovations are inherently complex. We must devote resources to technology development in order to keep pace with such rapidly evolving technologies. We believe that our future success will depend upon our ability to design, engineer and manufacture products and services that meet the changing needs of our customers. This requires that we successfully anticipate and respond to technological changes in design, engineering and manufacturing processes, as well as cleaning and analytical processes, in a cost-effective and timely manner. If we are unable to integrate new technical specifications into competitive product and service designs, develop the technical capabilities necessary to manufacture new products or provide new services or make necessary modifications or enhancements to existing products or services, our business prospects could be harmed.

The timely development of new or enhanced products and services is a complex and uncertain process which requires that we:

design innovative and performance-enhancing features that differentiate our products and services from those of our competitors;

identify emerging technological trends in the industries we serve, including new standards for our products;products and services;

accurately identify and design new products and services to meet market needs;

collaborate with OEMs to design and develop products and IDMs to design and develop services on a timely and cost-effective basis;

ramp-up production of new products, especially new subsystems, in a timely manner and with acceptable yields at acceptable costs;

successfully manage development production cycles; and

respond effectively to technological changes or product or service announcements by others.

If we are unsuccessful in keeping pace with technological developments for the reasons above or other reasons, our business prospects, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.


We must achieve design wins to retain our existing customers and to obtain new customers.

New capital equipment typically has a lifespan of several years, and OEMs frequently specify which systems, subsystems, components and instruments are to be used in their equipment. Once a specific system, subsystem, component or instrument is incorporated into a piece of capital equipment, it will likely continue to be incorporated into that piece of equipment for at least several months before the OEM would be in a position to switch to the product of another supplier. IDMs typically establish cleaning, coating, and analytical services as they develop and qualify new chip designs for production. Once a cleaned or coated part has been qualified, the associated refurbishment processes are likely to continue to be used. Accordingly, it is important that our products are designed into the new capital equipment of OEMs and new chip designs, which we refer to as a design win, in order to retain our competitive position with existing customers and to obtain new customers.

We incur technology development and sales expenses with no assurance that our products will ultimately be designed into an OEM’s capital equipment. Further, developing new customer relationships, as well as maintaining and increasing our market share with existing customers, requires a substantial investment of our sales, engineering and management resources without any assurance from prospective customers that they will place significant orders. We believe that OEMs and IDMs often consider long-term relationships in selecting and placing orders with suppliers. Accordingly, we may have difficulty achieving design wins from OEMs and IDMs that are not currently our customers. Our operating results and potential growth could be adversely affected if we fail to achieve design wins with leading OEMs.OEMs and IDMs.


Defects in our products could damage our reputation, decrease market acceptance of our products, cause the unintended release of hazardous materials, and result in potentially costly litigation, indemnification liability or unexpected warranty claims.

A number of factors, including design flaws, material and component failures, workmanship issues, contamination in the manufacturing, cleaning, coating or analytical environment, impurities in the materials or chemicals used and unknown sensitivities to process conditions, such as temperature and humidity, as well as equipment failures, may cause our products to contain undetected errors or defects. Problems with our products may:

cause delays in product introductions and shipments for us or our customers;

result in increased costs and diversion of development resources;

cause us to incur increased charges due to unusable inventory;

require design modifications;

result in liability for the unintended release of hazardous materials or other damages to our or our customers’ property;

create claims for rework, replacement and/or damages under our contracts with customers, as well as indemnification claims from customers;

decrease market acceptance of, or customer satisfaction with, our products, which could result in decreased sales and product returns; or

result in lower yields for semiconductor manufacturers.

If any of our products contain defects or have reliability, quality or compatibility problems, our reputation might be damaged and customers might be reluctant to buy our products.products or services. We may also face a higher rate of product defects as we increase our production levels. Product defects could result in warranty and indemnification liability, the loss of existing customers or impair our ability to attract new customers. In addition, we may not find defects or failures in our products until after they are installed in a manufacturer’s fabrication facility. We may have to invest significant capital and other resources to correct these problems. Our current or potential customers also might seek to recover from us any losses resulting from defects or failures in our products. Hazardous materials flow through and are controlled by our products and an unintended release of these materials could result in serious injury or death. Liability claims could require us to spend significant time and money in litigation or pay significant damages or indemnification claims.


Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

The majority of our international revenues are denominated in U.S. dollars. Many of the costs and expenses associated with our international operations are paid in foreign currencies, including Chinese Renminbi, Singapore dollars, Japanese Yen, South Korean Won and Euro and we expect our exposure to these foreign currencies to increase as we increase production in those facilities. Changes in exchange rates among foreign currencies in which our revenue or costs are denominated and the U.S. dollar may affect our revenue, cost of revenues, operating margins and tax.

The Company uses derivative instruments, such as foreign currency forward contracts, to hedge certain exposures to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The use of such hedging activities may not offset any, or more than a portion, of the adverse financial effects of unfavorable movements in foreign currency exchange rates over the limited time the hedges are in place.

The market for our stock is subject to significant fluctuation.

The size of our public market capitalization is relatively small, and the average volume of our shares that are traded is relatively low. The market price of our common stock could be subject to significant fluctuations. Among the factors that could affect our stock price are:

quarterly variations in our operating results;

our ability to successfully introduce new products and services and manage new product transitions;

changes in revenue or earnings estimates or publication of research reports by analysts;

speculation in the press or investment community;

strategic actions by us, our customers or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings;

announcements relating to any of our key customers, significant suppliers or the semiconductor manufacturing and capital equipment industry generally;

general market conditions;

the effects of war and terrorist attacks; and

domestic and international economic or political factors unrelated to our performance.

The stock markets in general, and the markets for technology stocks in particular, have experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

The technology labor market is very competitive, and our business will suffer if we are unable to effectively hire, promote and retain key personnel.

Our future success depends in part on the continued service of our key executive officers, as well as our research, engineering, sales, manufacturing and administrative personnel, most of whom are not subject to employment or non-competition agreements. In addition, competition for qualified personnel in the technology industry is intense, and we operate in geographic locations in which labor markets are particularly competitive.

Our business is particularly dependent on expertise which only a limited number of engineers possess. The loss of any of our key employees and officers, including our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, any of our Executive or Senior Vice Presidents or any of our other senior managers, or the failure to attract, promote and retain qualified employees, could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

Management transition also creates uncertainties and could harm our business. Disruption to our organization as a result of executive management transition could divert the executive management’s attention away from certain key areas of our business and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


The challenges of employee retention has also increased during the integration process with the companies we have acquired because of the necessity of combining personnel with varied business backgrounds and combining different corporate cultures and objectives, and several acquired employees, including members of the acquired companies’ senior management, have left our company. The process of integrating operations and making such adjustments could cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the activities of one or more of our businesses and the loss of key personnel. Employee uncertainty, lack of focus or turnover during the integration process may also disrupt our businesses.

If we fail to maintain an effective system ofWe have identified material weaknesses in our internal controls, we might not be able to report our financial results accurately or prevent fraud; in that case, our stockholders could lose confidence in ourcontrol over financial reporting which, would harmif not remediated, could adversely affect our reputation, business or stock price.

Based on our evaluation under the COSO framework as further described under “Item 9A – Controls and could negatively impactProcedures,” our management concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 27, 2019 due to material weaknesses attributable to deficiencies in the pricedesign and implementation of business process controls and information technology general controls relating to all relevant accounts and cycles within our Semiconductor Services Business (SSB) segment.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our stock.annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and prevent fraud. In addition, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us and our independent registered public accounting firm to evaluate and report on our internal control over financial reporting. The process of designing, implementing, maintaining and updating our internal controls and complying with Section 404 is expensive and time consuming, and requires significant attention from management and company resources. In addition, following the expiration of applicable grace periods, we are required to evaluate and report on the internal controls of the companies we acquire, and the attestation report we are required to obtain from our independent registered public accounting firm must include the internal control over financial reporting of the companies we acquire. Integrating acquired companies’ internal control frameworks into the Company and upgrading acquired companies’ controls to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has required and will require substantial resources, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully or effectively maintain adequate controls over our financial processes at our acquired companies, or for our consolidated business. In addition, even though we have concluded, and our independent registered public accounting firm has concurred, that our internal control over financial reporting provides reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as of December 29, 2017, because of its inherent limitations may not be effective as of future periods. Failure to maintain existing or implement new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could harm our results of operations or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations.

Although the Company has begun the process of executing remediation plans that address the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as described above, we cannot assure you that this will occur within the contemplated timeframe. Moreover, we cannot assure you that we will not identify additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting in the future. If we orare unable to remediate the material weaknesses, our independent registered public accounting firm discover a material weakness,ability to record, process and report financial information accurately, and to prepare financial statements within the disclosuretime periods specified by the rules and forms of that fact, even if quickly remedied,the Securities and Exchange Commission, could be adversely affected and could reduce the market’s confidence in our financial statements and harm our stock price.

Fluctuations in currency exchange rates may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our international sales are denominated primarily, though not entirely, in U.S. dollars. Many of the costs and expenses associated with our Chinese subsidiaries, Singaporean and Czech subsidiaries are paid in Chinese Renminbi, Singapore dollars, and Euro respectively and we expect our exposure to Chinese Renminbi, Singapore dollars and Euro to increase as we increase production in those facilities. In addition, purchases of some of our components are denominated in Japanese Yen and Euro. Changes in exchange rates among other currencies in which our revenue or costs are denominated and the U.S. dollar may affect our revenue, cost of sales and operating margins.

The Company uses derivative instruments, such as foreign currency forward contracts, to hedge certain exposures to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The use of such hedging activities may not offset any, or more than a portion, of the adverse financial effects of unfavorable movements in foreign exchange rates over the limited time the hedges are in place.

If environmental contamination were to occur in one of our manufacturingproduction facilities, we could be subject to substantial liabilities.

We use substances regulated under various foreign, domestic, federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations in our manufacturing facilities. In addition, we may not be aware of or in compliance with all environmental laws or regulations that could subject us to liability in the U.S. or internationally. Our failure or inability to comply with existing or future environmental lawsrequirements could result in significant remediation and other liabilities, the imposition of fines or the suspension or termination of the production of our services or products, and thus a material adverse impact on our business.


Our business is subject to the risks of earthquakes, fire, power outages, floods, and other catastrophic events, and to interruption by man-made disruptions, such as terrorism.

Our facilities could be subject to a catastrophic loss caused by natural disasters, including fires and earthquakes. We have facilities in areas with above average seismic activity, such as our manufacturing facilityfacilities in South San Francisco, California, Hayward, California and our manufacturing and headquartersTaiwan facilities in Hayward, California.Hsinchu and Tainan. If any of our facilities were to experience a catastrophic loss, it could disrupt our operations, delay production and shipments, reduce revenue and result in large expenses to repair or replace the facility. In addition, we have in the past experienced, and may in the future experience, fires and extended power outages at our facilities.facilities, such as the fire that occurred at a plant operated by our joint venture, Cinos Korea, in Balan, Republic of Korea, which we announced on September 19, 2018. We do not carry insurance policies that cover potential losses caused by earthquakes or other natural disasters or power loss.

In addition, disruption in supply resulting from natural disasters or other causalities or catastrophic events, such as earthquakes, severe weather such as storms or floods, fires, public health epidemic, labor disruptions, power outages, terrorist attacks or political unrest, may result in certain of our suppliers being unable to deliver sufficient quantities of components or raw materials at all or in a timely manner, disruptions in our operations or disruptions in our customers’ operations. For example, in 2011, the northern region of Japan experienced a severe earthquake followed by a tsunami. These geological events caused significant damage in that region and adversely affected Japan’s infrastructure and economy. Some of our suppliers are located in Japan and they experienced, and may experience in the future, shutdowns or disruptions as a result of these types of events, and their operations may be negatively impacted by these events. Many of our customers and suppliers are also located in California, and may be subject to the same risk of seismic activity as described for us above. Similarly, the novel coronavirus (now called “COVID-19”) outbreak in Wuhan, China in December 2019 forced the Chinese government to extend the Lunar New Year holidays in certain cities and provinces in China, and forced many others to put travel restrictions to and out of China. Such public health epidemic may adversely affect some of our operations in China, disrupting our manufacturing capacity out of the affected regions.

To the extent that natural disasters or other calamities or causalities should result in delays or cancellations of customer orders, or the delay in the manufacture or shipment of our products or services, our business, financial condition and operating results would be adversely affected.

Changes in tax rates or tax assets and liabilities could affect results of operations.

As a global company, we are subject to taxation in the United States and various other countries. Significant judgment is required to determine and estimate worldwide tax liabilities. Our future annual and quarterly tax rates could be affected by numerous factors, including changes in the: (1) applicable tax laws; (2) amount and composition of pre-tax income in countries with differing tax rates; or (3) valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Act Cuts and Jobs (“TCJA”) was signed into law. The TCJA contains significant changes to corporate taxation, including reduction of the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, additional limitations on the tax deductibility of interest, substantial changes to the taxation of foreign earnings, immediate deductions for certain new investments instead of deductions for depreciation expense over time, and modification or repeal of many business deductions and credits. The Company has made reasonable estimates of the financial impact of the TCJA on the Company. However, the estimates are provisional and a change in estimate can have an impact on our results of operations, cash flows and financial conditions, as well as the trading price of our Common Stock. UCT will continue to analyze the effects of the TCJA on its financial statements and operations. Additional impacts from the enactment of the TCJA will be recorded as they are identified during the one-year measurement period as provided for in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 118.

In addition, we are subject to regular examination by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities, and from time to time we initiate amendments to previously filed tax returns. We regularly assess the likelihood of favorable or unfavorable outcomes resulting from these examinations and amendments to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes, which requires estimates and judgments. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, there can be no assurance that the tax authorities will agree with such estimates. We may have to engage in litigation to achieve the results reflected in the estimates, which may be time-consuming and expensive. There can be no assurance that we will be successful or that any final determination will not be materially different from the treatment reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals, which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.


The market for our stock is subject to significant fluctuation.

The size of our public market capitalization is relatively small, and the average volume of our shares that are traded is relatively low. The market price of our common stock could be subject to significant fluctuations. Among the factors that could affect our stock price are:

quarterly variations in our operating results;

our ability to successfully introduce new products and manage new product transitions;

changes in revenue or earnings estimates or publication of research reports by analysts;

speculation in the press or investment community;

strategic actions by us, our customers or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings;

announcements relating to any of our key customers, significant suppliers or the semiconductor manufacturing and capital equipment industry generally;

general market conditions;

the effects of war and terrorist attacks; and

domestic and international economic or political factors unrelated to our performance.

The stock markets in general, and the markets for technology stocks in particular, have experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

Certain regulations related to conflict minerals could adversely impact our business.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act contains provisions to improve transparency and accountability concerning the supply of certain minerals, known as conflict minerals, originating from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. As a result, in August 2012 the SEC adopted annual disclosure and reporting requirements for those companies who use conflict minerals mined from the DRC and adjoining countries in their products. These requirements require us to perform on-goingongoing due diligence efforts on our supply chain and require public disclosure of the nature and results of these efforts. We filed our most recent conflict minerals report on Form SD on May 31, 201730, 2019 reporting that we could not yet determine whether the conflict minerals we source were, directly or indirectly, used to finance or benefit armed groups in the Covered Countries.


There have been and there will be costs associated with complying with these disclosure requirements to determine the sources of conflict minerals used in our products and other potential changes to products, processes or sources of supply as a consequence of such verification activities. Complying with these rules could adversely affect the sourcing, supply and pricing of materials used in our products and result in substantial additional costs. As there may be only a limited number of suppliers offering “conflict free” conflict minerals, we cannot be sure that we will be able to obtain necessary conflict minerals from such suppliers in sufficient quantities or at competitive prices. Also, we may face reputational challenges if we determine that certain of our products contain minerals not determined to be conflict free or if we are unable to sufficiently verify the origins for all conflict minerals used in our products through the procedures we may implement. In addition, ifthere is uncertainty about the future of the regulations related to conflict minerals as a result of legal challenges and statements by the SEC. If we are unable to comply with these rules, we could be subject to enforcement actions by the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC and liability under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which could result in material adverse consequences to our business, as well as significant fines and penalties.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they issue an adverse opinion regarding our stock, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock is influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business. If any of the analysts who cover us issue an adverse opinion regarding our stock, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our company or fails to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.


We do not currently intend to pay dividends on our common stock and, consequently, your ability to achieve a return on your investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our common stock.

We do not intend to declare and pay dividends on our capitalUCT’s common stock for the foreseeable future. We currently intend to invest our future earnings, if any, to fund our growth. Additionally, the terms of our credit agreement also restrict our ability to pay dividends. Therefore, you are not likely to receive any dividends on your common stock for the foreseeable future.

From time to time, we may become involved in other litigation and regulatory proceedings, which could require significant attention from our management and result in significant expense to us and disruptions into our business.

In addition to any litigation related to our intellectual property rights, we may in the future be named as a defendant from time to time in other lawsuits and regulatory actions relating to our business, such as commercial contract claims, environmental compliance claims, employment claims and tax examinations, some of which may claim significant damages or cause us reputational harm. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation and regulatory proceedings, we cannot predict the ultimate outcome of any such proceeding. An unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations or limit our ability to engage in certain of our business activities. In addition, regardless of the outcome of any litigation or regulatory proceeding, such proceedings are often expensive, time-consuming and disruptive to normal business operations and require significant attention from our management. As a result, any such lawsuits or proceedings could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, on January 29, 2018, we disclosed that the former shareholders of Miconex are disputing the Company’s determination that Miconex failed to achieve the specified performance target applicable to the potential cash “earn-out” payments under the acquisition agreement for the second annual performance period ended July 2017 (the “Performance Target”). The Company expects the dispute to be resolved pursuant to the dispute resolution provisions of the acquisition agreement. We believes that Miconex did not achieve the Performance Target, and therefore no earn-out payment is owed by us. We intend to vigorously defend our position. However, there can be no assurance that the dispute will be resolved in our favor. If the dispute is resolved adversely to us, the Company would expect to record a charge to Interest and Other Income (Expense), net of not more than $1.0 million.

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.

Properties

OurUCT’s headquarters is located in a 108,000 square foot facilityHayward, California and its QGT subsidiary’s headquarters is located in Hayward, California. This is our principalQuakertown, Pennsylvania. These facilities provide administrative, sales and support, engineering and technology development and manufacturing facility. This lease expiresoperations. The leases for these facilities expire in 2022. We also have2021 and 2022, respectively.


The Company has manufacturing and engineering facilities in Hayward, South San Francisco and Fremont, California, and Austin, Texas. In South San Francisco we lease an aggregate of approximately 124,000 square feet under several leases which expire in 2018. In Fremont, we lease approximately 9,000 square feet under a lease that expires in 2018. Marchi is also located in Hayward, California, we lease approximately 22,000 square feet under a lease that expires in 2020. We also have manufacturing facilities inTexas, Chandler, Arizona; Shanghai, China; Singapore; Cebu, Philippines and Liberec, Czech Republic. In Arizona, we lease approximately 120,000 square feet under leases that expireThe Company has parts cleaning, analytics and engineering facilities in 2022. In Austin, we lease an aggregate of approximately 56,000 square feet under leases that expire in 2021. In Shanghai, we lease approximately 154,000 square feet of commercial space under three leases that expire in 2018 Colorado Springs, Colorado; Phoenix, Arizona; San Jose, California; Fremont, California; Hillsboro, Oregon; Portland, Oregon; Scarborough, Maine; Carrollton, Texas; Israel, Taiwan, South Korea, Singapore and 2019. In Singapore, we lease approximately 183,000 square feet under four separateXi’an, China. These facilities have leases that expire on various dates through 2022 with extension provisions. In2031 and are subject to periodic changes.

We also own buildings and land that are located in South Korea, China and the Philippines, we lease approximately 16,000 square feet under three separate leasesUnited Kingdom.

We believe that expireour existing facilities are well-maintained and in 2018 and 2019. In Miconex, we lease approximately 97,000 square feet of manufacturing facilities under seven separate leases that expire in 2019.good operating condition.


The table below lists our properties as of March 14, 2018:11, 2020:

 

Location

 

Principal Use

 

Square Footage

 

 

Ownership

 

 

Principal Use

 

Square Footage

 

 

Ownership

 

Hayward, California

 

Headquarters, manufacturing, sales, engineering, technology development

 

 

131,000

 

 

Leased

 

 

Headquarters, manufacturing, sales, engineering, technology development

 

 

148,855

 

 

Leased

 

South San Francisco, California

 

Manufacturing, engineering

 

 

124,000

 

 

Leased

(1)

 

Manufacturing, engineering

 

 

123,847

 

 

Leased

(1)

Fremont, California

 

Manufacturing, engineering

 

 

9,000

 

 

Leased

 

 

Manufacturing, engineering

 

 

9,000

 

 

Leased

 

Austin, Texas

 

Manufacturing, engineering

 

 

56,000

 

 

Leased

 

 

Manufacturing, engineering

 

 

56,400

 

 

Leased

 

Chandler, Arizona

 

Manufacturing

 

 

120,000

 

 

Leased

 

 

Manufacturing

 

 

127,301

 

 

Leased

 

Beaverton, Oregon

 

Customer support

 

 

1,000

 

 

Leased

 

Cebu, Philippines

 

Manufacturing

 

 

16,000

 

 

Leased

 

 

Manufacturing

 

 

15,726

 

 

Leased

 

Singapore

 

Manufacturing, customer support

 

 

183,000

 

 

Leased

 

 

Manufacturing, customer support

 

 

161,814

 

 

Leased

 

Shanghai, China

 

Manufacturing

 

 

154,000

 

 

Leased

 

 

Manufacturing

 

 

154,068

 

 

Leased

 

Czech Republic

 

Manufacturing, customer support

 

 

97,000

 

 

Leased

 

Liberec, Czech Republic

 

Manufacturing, customer support

 

 

97,171

 

 

Leased

 

Quakertown, Pennsylvania

 

Headquarters

 

 

8,077

 

 

Leased

 

Colorado Springs, Colorado

 

Parts Cleaning

 

 

14,000

 

 

Leased

 

Scarborough, Maine

 

Parts Cleaning

 

 

20,000

 

 

Leased

 

San Jose, California

 

Parts Cleaning

 

 

20,130

 

 

Leased

 

Fremont, California

 

Parts Cleaning, R&D, Laboratory & Recycling

 

 

59,161

 

 

Leased

 

Hillsboro, Oregon

 

Parts Cleaning

 

 

61,334

 

 

Leased

 

Portland, Oregon

 

Testing & Parts Cleaning

 

 

5,156

 

 

Leased

 

Phoenix, Arizona

 

Parts Cleaning

 

 

72,884

 

 

Leased

 

Carrollton, Texas

 

Parts Cleaning

 

 

121,968

 

 

Leased

 

Quiryat Gat, Israel

 

Parts Cleaning

 

 

56,758

 

 

Leased

 

Fife, Scotland, United Kingdom

 

Parts Cleaning

 

 

26,658

 

 

Own

 

Singapore

 

Parts Cleaning

 

 

55,122

 

 

Leased

 

Hukou Township, Taiwan

 

Parts Cleaning

 

 

30,354

 

 

Leased

 

Tainan, Taiwan

 

Parts Cleaning

 

 

90,000

 

 

Leased

 

Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

 

Parts Cleaning

 

 

40,000

 

 

Own

 

Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

 

Parts Cleaning

 

 

157,453

 

 

Own

 

Hwaseong-si, South Korea

 

Parts Cleaning

 

 

95,814

 

 

Own

 

Xi'an, China

 

Parts Cleaning

 

 

66,185

 

 

Own

 

 

(1)

We lease this facility from one of our directors. We incurred rent expense resulting from the lease of this facility of $0.4 million and $0.3 million for each of fiscal years 20172019 and 2016.2018, respectively.

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we are subject to various legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, that arise in the ordinary course of business. Although the outcome of the various legal proceedings and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we have not had a history of outcomes to date that have been material to our statement of operations and do not believe that any of these proceedings or other claims will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.


PART II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Stock Exchange Listing

Our common stock has been traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “UCTT” since March 25, 2004. The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low sales prices per shareAs of ourFebruary 21, 2020, there were three holders of record of UCTT common stock as reported by the NASDAQ Global Market:stock.

 

 

 

High

 

 

Low

 

Fiscal year 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First quarter

 

$

5.72

 

 

$

4.50

 

Second quarter

 

$

6.07

 

 

$

4.95

 

Third quarter

 

$

7.50

 

 

$

5.40

 

Fourth quarter

 

$

10.65

 

 

$

6.79

 

Fiscal year 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First quarter

 

$

16.99

 

 

$

9.42

 

Second quarter

 

$

26.21

 

 

$

14.93

 

Third quarter

 

$

30.92

 

 

$

18.41

 

Fourth quarter

 

$

34.59

 

 

$

18.86

 

Dividends on Common Stock

To date, we have not declared or paid cash dividends to our UCT stockholders and we do not intend to do so for the foreseeable future in order to retain earnings for use in our business. Our credit facility also limits our ability to pay dividends. As

Stock Performance Graph

The following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the Securities Act of February 23, 2018,1933 or the Exchange Act, each as amended, except to the extent that we had three stockholdersspecifically incorporate it by reference into such filing.

The following stock performance graph compares the cumulative total stockholder returns during the period from December 26, 2014 to December 27, 2019 of record.our common stock to the NASDAQ Composite Index and the RDG Semiconductor Composite Index. The comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 26, 2014 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices. The stock performance shown on the following graph represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.


The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low sales prices per share of our common stock as reported by the NASDAQ Global Market:

 

 

High

 

 

Low

 

Fiscal year 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First quarter

 

$

27.20

 

 

$

16.29

 

Second quarter

 

$

19.59

 

 

$

15.36

 

Third quarter

 

$

17.35

 

 

$

12.28

 

Fourth quarter

 

$

13.00

 

 

$

6.94

 

Fiscal year 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First quarter

 

$

13.12

 

 

$

7.93

 

Second quarter

 

$

14.82

 

 

$

10.50

 

Third quarter

 

$

16.67

 

 

$

11.20

 

Fourth quarter

 

$

24.24

 

 

$

13.94

 

Recent Sales of Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

None.

Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

None.


Item 6.

Selected Consolidated Financial Data

You should read the following tables in conjunction with other information contained under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” our consolidated financial statements and related notes and other financial information contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Statements of Operations Data (in thousands, except per share amounts):Data:

 

 

 

Years Ended

 

 

 

12/29/2017

 

 

12/30/2016

 

 

12/25/2015*

 

 

12/26/2014

 

 

12/27/2013

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

$

 

924,351

 

 

$

 

562,759

 

 

$

 

469,103

 

 

$

 

513,957

 

 

$

 

444,022

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

 

756,722

 

 

 

 

475,976

 

 

 

 

398,073

 

 

 

 

440,824

 

 

 

 

376,693

 

Gross profit

 

 

 

167,629

 

 

 

 

86,783

 

 

 

 

71,030

 

 

 

 

73,133

 

 

 

 

67,329

 

Operating expenses, excluding acquisition costs

 

 

 

78,232

 

 

 

 

64,392

 

 

 

 

64,605

 

 

 

 

54,949

 

 

 

 

51,421

 

Acquisition costs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

584

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations

 

 

 

89,397

 

 

 

 

22,391

 

 

 

 

5,841

 

 

 

 

18,184

 

 

 

 

15,908

 

Interest expense and other, net

 

 

 

(2,455

)

 

 

 

(3,444

)

 

 

 

(2,234

)

 

 

 

(1,854

)

 

 

 

(3,309

)

Income before income taxes

 

 

 

86,942

 

 

 

 

18,947

 

 

 

 

3,607

 

 

 

 

16,330

 

 

 

 

12,599

 

Income tax provision

 

 

 

11,857

 

 

 

 

8,896

 

 

 

 

14,339

 

 

 

 

4,973

 

 

 

 

2,175

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

 

75,085

 

 

$

 

10,051

 

 

$

 

(10,732

)

 

$

 

11,357

 

 

$

 

10,424

 

Net income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

 

2.25

 

 

$

 

0.31

 

 

$

 

(0.34

)

 

$

 

0.39

 

 

$

 

0.37

 

Diluted

 

$

 

2.19

 

 

$

 

0.30

 

 

$

 

(0.34

)

 

$

 

0.38

 

 

$

 

0.36

 

Shares used in computation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

 

33,409

 

 

 

 

32,632

 

 

 

 

31,564

 

 

 

 

29,301

 

 

 

 

28,346

 

Diluted

 

 

 

34,303

 

 

 

 

33,150

 

 

 

 

31,564

 

 

 

 

29,936

 

 

 

 

29,037

 

 

Year ended

 

(In millions, except per share amounts)

12/28/2019 (1)

 

 

12/28/2018 (2)

 

 

12/29/2017

 

 

12/30/2016

 

 

12/25/2015 (3)

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:

 

Revenues

$

 

1,066.2

 

 

$

 

1,096.5

 

 

$

 

924.4

 

 

$

 

562.8

 

 

$

 

469.1

 

Cost of revenues

 

 

869.4

 

 

 

 

920.7

 

 

 

 

756.7

 

 

 

 

476.0

 

 

 

 

398.1

 

Gross margin

 

 

196.8

 

 

 

 

175.8

 

 

 

 

167.7

 

 

 

 

86.8

 

 

 

 

71.0

 

Operating expenses

 

 

166.9

 

 

 

 

115.1

 

 

 

 

78.2

 

 

 

 

64.4

 

 

 

 

65.2

 

Income from operations

 

 

29.9

 

 

 

 

60.7

 

 

 

 

89.5

 

 

 

 

22.4

 

 

 

 

5.8

 

Interest and other income (expense), net

 

 

(27.6

)

 

 

 

(8.4

)

 

 

 

(2.5

)

 

 

 

(3.4

)

 

 

 

(2.2

)

Income before provision for income taxes

 

 

2.3

 

 

 

 

52.3

 

 

 

 

87.0

 

 

 

 

19.0

 

 

 

 

3.6

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

10.0

 

 

 

 

15.3

 

 

 

 

11.9

 

 

 

 

8.9

 

 

 

 

14.3

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

(7.7

)

 

 

 

37.0

 

 

 

 

75.1

 

 

 

 

10.1

 

 

 

 

(10.7

)

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling

   interests

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to UCT

$

 

(9.4

)

 

$

 

36.6

 

 

$

 

75.1

 

 

$

 

10.1

 

 

$

 

(10.7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per share attributable to UCT

   common stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

$

 

(0.24

)

 

$

 

0.95

 

 

$

 

2.25

 

 

$

 

0.31

 

 

$

 

(0.34

)

Diluted

$

 

(0.24

)

 

$

 

0.94

 

 

$

 

2.19

 

 

$

 

0.30

 

 

$

 

(0.34

)

Shares used in computing net income (loss)

   per share:

 

Basic

 

 

39.5

 

 

 

 

38.4

 

 

 

 

33.4

 

 

 

 

32.6

 

 

 

 

31.6

 

Diluted

 

 

39.5

 

 

 

 

38.9

 

 

 

 

34.3

 

 

 

 

33.2

 

 

 

 

31.6

 

 

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data (in thousands):Data:

 

 

12/29/2017

 

 

12/30/2016

 

 

12/25/2015*

 

 

12/26/2014

 

 

12/27/2013

 

(In millions)

 

12/28/2019 (1)

 

 

12/28/2018 (2)

 

 

12/29/2017

 

 

12/30/2016

 

 

12/25/2015 (3)

 

Cash & cash equivalents

 

$

 

68,306

 

 

$

 

52,465

 

 

$

 

50,103

 

 

$

 

78,997

 

 

$

 

60,415

 

 

$

 

162.5

 

 

$

 

144.1

 

 

$

 

68.3

 

 

$

 

52.5

 

 

$

 

50.1

 

Working capital

 

 

200,101

 

 

 

 

136,389

 

 

 

 

125,428

 

 

 

 

142,279

 

 

 

 

100,415

 

 

$

 

256.4

 

 

$

 

323.6

 

 

$

 

200.1

 

 

$

 

136.4

 

 

$

 

125.4

 

Total assets

 

 

563,412

 

 

 

 

380,697

 

 

 

 

336,153

 

 

 

 

296,142

 

 

 

 

292,543

 

 

$

 

1,019.3

 

 

$

 

965.5

 

 

$

 

563.4

 

 

$

 

380.7

 

 

$

 

336.2

 

Bank borrowings and long-term debt

 

 

52,274

 

 

 

 

67,750

 

 

 

 

75,539

 

 

 

 

48,155

 

 

 

 

55,126

 

 

$

 

292.2

 

 

$

 

341.2

 

 

$

 

52.3

 

 

$

 

67.8

 

 

$

 

75.5

 

Short-and long-term rent obligations

 

 

6,556

 

 

 

 

3,291

 

 

 

 

3,769

 

 

 

 

2,948

 

 

 

 

3,302

 

Other long term liabilities

 

$

 

44.0

 

 

$

 

43.6

 

 

$

 

6.6

 

 

$

 

3.3

 

 

$

 

3.8

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

300,305

 

 

 

 

216,131

 

 

 

 

200,943

 

 

 

 

188,552

 

 

 

 

171,929

 

 

$

 

452.5

 

 

$

 

451.0

 

 

$

 

300.3

 

 

$

 

216.1

 

 

$

 

200.9

 

 

*(1)

Includes the results of operations of MarchiDMS for the period from April 15, 2019 to December 27, 2019.

(2)

Includes the results of operations of QGT for the period from August 27, 2018 to December 28, 2018.

(3)

Includes the results of operations of Thermal and MiconexFDS for the period February 5, 2015 through December 25, 2015 and for the period from July 31, 2015 to December 25, 2015, respectively. See Note 4 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

See Note 2 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.


Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and AnalysisAnalysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This section and other parts of this Annual Report on Form 10-K contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements can also be identified by words such as anticipate,expects,“believe,“anticipates,“estimate,“targets,“expect,“goals,“intend,“projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “continues,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “project,“will be,” “will continue,“would,” “should,” “could,” “can,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” “objective,”“will likely results, and similar terms. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and our actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in “Item 1A — Risk Factors” above. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statement and notes thereto included in Item 8 of this report. We assume no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason, except as required by law.

Overview

We are a global leader in the design, engineering and manufacture of production tools, modules and subsystems for the semiconductor and display capital equipment industrymarkets.  Our products include chemical delivery modules, frame assemblies, gas delivery systems, fluid delivery systems, precision robotics, process modules as well as other high level assemblies. Our services provide part cleaning, surface encapsulation, and industry segments with similar requirements including display, consumer and medical. We focus on providing specialized engineering and manufacturing solutionshigh sensitivity micro contamination analysis primarily for these applications. We enable our customers to realize lower manufacturing costs and reduced design-to-delivery cycle times while maintaining high quality standards.

The capital equipment market continued to show strength during 2017, primarily from multiple technological advances driving the semiconductor industry. Delivering solutions that enable next-generation 3D NAND devices drove the Wafer Fab Equipment industrydevice makers and wafer fabrication (WFE) equipment markets.

With our acquisition of Quantum Global Technologies, LLC (“QGT”), on August 27, 2018, a leader in 2017. Weparts cleaning, coating and foundry related analytical services, we expanded our operations and manufacturing in Asia as revenues from outside the U.S. grew by 83.4%. Our revenue and earnings grew to the highest levels in the Company’s history. Total revenue climbed 64.3% in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016, driven by 69.0% growth in our semiconductor equipment business. We have expanded and continue to expand our capabilities to enableprovide ultra-high purity parts cleaning, process tool part recoating, surface treatment, and analytical services to the manufacturing of additional major modulessemiconductor and further increase our critical content on our customers’ platforms.related industries.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth income statement data forHistorically, the periods indicatedCompany has operated under one operating segment. However, as a percentageresult of revenue:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

December 29,

 

 

 

December 30,

 

 

 

December 25,

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

2015

 

 

Sales

 

 

100.0

 

%

 

 

100.0

 

%

 

 

100.0

 

%

Cost of goods sold

 

 

81.9

 

 

 

 

84.6

 

 

 

 

84.9

 

 

Gross profit

 

 

18.1

 

 

 

 

15.4

 

 

 

 

15.1

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

 

1.8

 

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

 

2.1

 

 

 

 

2.5

 

 

General and administrative

 

 

5.6

 

 

 

 

7.6

 

 

 

 

9.3

 

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

8.4

 

 

 

 

11.5

 

 

 

 

13.8

 

 

Income from operations

 

 

9.7

 

 

 

 

3.9

 

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

Interest and other income (expense), net

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

 

(0.6

)

 

 

 

(0.5

)

 

Income before provision for income taxes

 

 

9.4

 

 

 

 

3.3

 

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

Income tax provision

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

 

3.1

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

8.1

 

%

 

 

1.7

 

%

 

 

(2.3

)

%


the acquisition of QGT, the Company created an additional segment in the first quarter of 2019. Fiscal Year 2017 Compared With Fiscal Year 2016We elected to reorganize our organizational and reporting structure to capture efficiencies and operating leverage from our recent acquisition of QGT. We now report results for two segments: Semiconductor Products and Solutions (“Products” or “SPS”) and Semiconductor Services Business (“Services” or “SSB”).

Sales

SalesOn April 15, 2019, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Dynamic Manufacturing Solutions, LLC ("DMS"), a semiconductor weldment and solutions provider. Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, we paid $29.9 million in cash for fiscal year 2017 increased $361.6DMS, subject to certain post-closing adjustments as provided in the Acquisition Agreement. We may pay up to $12.5 million or 64.3% to $924.4 million from $562.8 million for fiscal year 2016. The increase in sales reflects an increase in semiconductor sales of $350.6 million and an increase in non-semiconductor sales of $11.0 million. The increase in overall sales for fiscal year 2017 comparedadditional cash earn-out payments to the same period in fiscal year 2016 was due primarily to an increase informer owners of DMS if, post-acquisition, the volume of products shipped, which was attributable to an increase in customer demand from 2016 levels. On a geographic basis, sales in the U.S. increased $136.3 million to $428.6 million, or 46.4% of sales, for the year ended December 29, 2017 as compared to $292.3 million, or 52.0% of sales for the same period of 2016. Foreign sales increased by $225.4 million to $495.8 million, or 53.6% of sales, for the year ended December 29, 2017 compared to $270.4 million, or 48.0% of sales, for the same period of 2016. The increase in foreign sales is due primarily to the continuing migration ofcombined weldment business achieves certain business with a U.S. customer from our U.S. operations to our Singapore location as well as increased demand for our products in our foreign locations.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for fiscal year 2017 increased $80.8 million to $167.6 million, or 18.1% of sales, from $86.8 million, or 15.4% of sales, for fiscal year 2016. Our gross profit and gross margin increasedtargets for the twelve months ending June 26, 2020. DMS reports into the SPS segment.

We ship a majority of our products and provide most of our services to U.S. registered customers with locations both in fiscal year 2017 fromand outside the comparable period in 2016 dueU.S. In addition to higher sales volume, increased factory utilizationU.S. manufacturing and increased labor efficiency.

Researchservice operations, we manufacture products and Development Expense

Research and development expense consists primarily of activities related to new component testing and evaluation, test equipment and fixture development, product design,provide parts cleaning and other product development activities. Researchrelated services in our Asian and development expense for fiscal year 2017 was $11.7 million or 1.3%European facilities to support local and U.S. based customers. We conduct our operating activities primarily through our subsidiaries, Ultra Clean Technology Systems and Service, Inc., American Integration Technologies, LL, Ultra Clean Micro-Electronics Equipment (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Ultra Clean Asia Pacific, Pte, Ltd., UCT Thermal Solutions, Inc., UCT Fluid Delivery Solutions s.r.o.(“FDS”), QGT and DMS. 

Over the long-term, we believe the semiconductor market we serve will continue to grow based on demand from a broad range of sales, compareddrivers, including applications such as autonomous vehicles, the Internet of Things, high performance computing, artificial intelligence, and technology to $9.9 million, or 1.8% of sales, for fiscal year 2016. The increase in research and development expense was duesupport the data sharing economy. We also believe that semiconductor equipment OEMs are increasingly relying on partners like UCT to an increase in non-production related engineering work and an increase in employee incentive compensation related expenses as a result of higher operating income.  

Sales and Marketing Expense

Sales and marketing expense consists primarily of salaries and commissions paid to our sales and service employees, salaries paid to our engineers who work with the sales and service employees to help determine the components and configuration requirements for new products and other costs related to the sales of our products. Sales and marketing expense increased approximately $2.1 million, or 18.8%, to $13.7 million, or 1.5% of sales, compared to $11.6 million, or 2.1% of sales, in the comparable period of 2016. The increase in sales and marketing expense was primarily due to higher employee compensation-related expenses resulting from an increase in headcount and increased bonuses due to increased operating profit.

General and Administrative Expense

General and administrative expense consists primarily of salaries and overhead associated with our administrative staff and professional fees. General and administrative expense increased $9.9 million, or 23.1%, to $52.8 million, or 5.6% of sales, for fiscal year 2017 compared to $42.9 million, or 7.6% of sales, for fiscal year 2016. The increase was primarily due higher employee compensation-related expenses due to an increase in headcount and increased bonuses due to increased operating profit and to an increase in outside services resulting from the non-capitalizeable implementation costs of our new enterprise reporting system.

Interest and Other Income (Expense), net

Interest and other income (expense) for fiscal year 2017 was $(2.5) million compared to $(3.4) million for fiscal year 2016. The decrease in net expense was primarily due to a decrease of $1.8 million related to the change in fair value of the Miconex contingent earn-out liability and due to a decrease in interest expense of $0.5 million resulting from the overall decrease in outstanding debt in fiscal year 2017. These decreases were offset by an increase in foreign exchange loss of $0.8 million in Czech Republic and in Asia and $0.3 million of grant monies received in 2016 from the Singapore Economic Development Board.fulfill their expanding capacity requirements.


Income Tax ProvisionCritical Accounting Estimates

Income tax expense was $11.9 million for fiscal year 2017 compared to $8.9 million for fiscal year 2016. Our effective tax rate for fiscal year 2017 was 13.6% compared to 46.9% for fiscal year 2016. The change in respective rates reflects, primarily, recently enacted US tax reform and changes in the geographic distribution of our worldwide earnings.  Our effective tax rate was lower than the statutory rates for fiscal year 2017 primarily due to the effects of tax reform and the geographic distribution of our worldwide earnings in foreign jurisdictions with lower tax rates as well as the impact of losses in jurisdictions with full federal and state valuation allowances.

For the year ended December 29, 2017, the Company concluded that a full valuation allowance against its U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets continues to be necessary. The total U.S. federal and state valuation allowance as of December 29, 2017 was $7.9 million.  

For the year ended December 29, 2017, the Company concluded that a full valuation allowance against one of its Singapore subsidiaries’ deferred tax assets continues to be necessary.  The total valuation allowance of the Singapore loss entity as of December 29, 2017 continues to be $0.2 million.

Our ability to realize deferred tax assets depends on our ability to generate sufficient taxable income within the carryback or carry forward periods. In assessing our future taxable income, we have considered all sources of future taxable income available to realize our deferred tax assets, including the taxable income from future reversal of existing temporary differences, carry forwards, taxable income in carryback years and tax-planning strategies. If changes occur in the assumptions underlying our tax planning strategies or in the scheduling of the reversal of our deferred tax liabilities, the valuation allowance may need to be adjusted in the future.

For the year ended December 29, 2017, we determined that a portion of the current year earnings of one of our China subsidiaries may be remitted in the future to one of our foreign subsidiaries outside of mainland China and, accordingly, we provided for the related foreign withholding taxes in our consolidated financial statements. If we change our intent to reinvest our undistributed foreign earnings indefinitely or if a greater amount of undistributed earnings are needed than the previously anticipated remaining unremitted foreign earnings, we could be required to accrue or pay U.S. taxes on some or all of these undistributed earnings.

Fiscal Year 2016 Compared With Fiscal Year 2015

Sales

Sales for fiscal year 2016 increased $93.7 million, or 20.0% to $562.8 million from $469.1 million for fiscal year 2015. The increase in sales for the fiscal year ended 2016 when compared to the same period of 2015 reflects an increase in semiconductor sales of $75.1 million and an increase in non-semiconductor sales of $18.6 million. The increase in overall sales for fiscal year 2016 compared to the same period in fiscal year 2015 was due primarily to an increase in the volume of products shipped, which was attributable to an increase in customer demand from 2015 levels. On a geographic basis, sales in the U.S. decreased by $15.1 million to $292.3 million, or 52.0% of sales, for the year ended December 30, 2016 as compared to $307.4 million, or 65.5% of sales for the same period of 2015. Foreign sales increased by $108.7 million to $270.4 million, or 48.0% of sales, for the year ended December 30, 2016 as compared to $161.7 million, or 34.5% of sales, for the same period of 2015. The increase in foreign sales was due primarily to the full year of operations of Miconex in fiscal 2016 and the migration of certain business with a U.S. customer from our U.S. operations to our Singapore location.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for fiscal year 2016 increased to $86.8 million or 15.4% of sales, from $71.0 million, or 15.1% of sales, for fiscal year 2015. Our gross margin percentage and absolute dollars of gross profit increased in fiscal year 2016 from the comparable period in 2015 due to higher sales volume, a sales mix which included higher margin products and certain improvements in operational efficiencies at our manufacturing locations in the U.S., which typically deliver lower margins due to higher labor and overhead costs.


Research and Development Expense

Research and development expense for fiscal year 2016 was $9.9 million or 1.8% of sales, compared to $9.6 million, or 2.0% of sales, for fiscal year 2015. The increase in research and development expense in absolute dollars was due primarily to the full year inclusion of Miconex and Marchi’s research and development activities in 2016.

Sales and Marketing Expense

Sales and marketing expense increased approximately $0.1 million, or 0.6%, to $11.6 million, or 2.1% of sales, compared to $11.5 million, or 2.5% of sales, in the comparable period of 2015.

General and Administrative Expense

General and administrative expense decreased $1.2 million, or 2.7%, to $42.9 million, or 7.6% of sales, for fiscal year 2016 compared to $44.1 million, or 9.3% of sales, for fiscal year 2015. The decrease in absolute dollars was primarily due to a $2.4 million payment to our former CEO in the first quarter of 2015 upon his retirement and a $0.5 million write off of the tradename intangible we acquired from AIT in the fourth quarter of 2015, offset by an increase of $0.8 million due to the full year inclusion of Marchi and Miconex in 2016 and by an $0.8 million payment made to our former CFO upon his retirement on July 29, 2016.

Interest and Other Income (Expense), net

Interest and other income (expense) for fiscal year 2016 was $(3.4) million compared to $(2.2) million for fiscal year 2015. The increase in net expense was primarily due to an increase in the change in fair value of the Miconex contingent earn-out liability of $1.9 million, offset by a decrease in interest expense of $0.4 million resulting from the overall decrease in outstanding debt in fiscal year 2016 and of $0.3 million grants received from the Singapore Economic Development Board.

Income Tax Provision

Income tax expense was $8.9 million for fiscal year 2016 compared to $14.3 million for fiscal year 2015. Our effective tax rate for fiscal year 2016 was 46.9% compared to 397.5% for fiscal year 2015. The change in respective rates reflects, primarily, a charge in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 related to recording a full valuation allowance on our U.S. federal and state net deferred tax assets. Our effective tax rate was higher than the statutory rates for fiscal year 2016 primarily due to the geographic distribution of our worldwide earnings in foreign jurisdictions with lower tax rates as well as the impact of losses in jurisdictions with full federal and state valuation allowances.

During the year ended December 30, 2016, the Company concluded that a full valuation allowance against its U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets continued to be necessary.  The total U.S. federal and state valuation allowance as of December 30, 2016 was $23.6 million.

For the year ended December 30, 2016, the Company concluded that a full valuation allowance against one of its Singapore subsidiaries’ deferred tax assets continued to be necessary.  The total valuation allowance of the Singapore loss entity as of December 30, 2016 was $0.2 million.

Critical Accounting Policies, Significant Judgments and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which requiresrequire us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosure at the date of our consolidated financial statements. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to sales,revenues, inventories, goodwill, and intangible assets stock compensationand long-lived assets and income taxes. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of our judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. We consider certain accounting policies related to revenue recognition, inventory valuation, accounting for income taxes, business combinations, valuation of goodwill, intangible assets and goodwill, and equity incentives to employeeslong-lived assets to be critical policies due to the estimates and judgments involved in each.


Revenue Recognition

Our revenuerevenues for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016 and 2015 waswere highly concentrated in a small number of OEM customers in the semiconductor capital equipment consumer, medical, energy, industrial and research industries.industry. Our standard arrangement for our customers includes a signed purchase order or contract, no right of return of delivered products and no customer acceptance provisions. Revenue from sales of products is recognized when:We perform the following five steps to determine when to recognize revenue:

we enter into a legally binding arrangementidentification of the contract(s) with a customer;customers;

title transfers toidentification of the customer, which generally occurs upon shipment;performance obligations in the contract;

customer payment is deemed fixed or determinable and freedetermination of contingencies or significant uncertainties;the transaction price;

allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and

collectionrecognition of revenue when, or as, a performance obligation is reasonably assured.satisfied.

Revenue is recognized upon shipment ofwhen promised goods or services (performance obligations) are transferred to a customer in an amount that reflects the product. In arrangementsconsideration to which specify title transfer upon delivery, revenue is not recognized until the product is delivered. In addition, if we have not fulfilled the terms of the agreement at the time of shipment, revenue recognition is deferred until fulfillment.expect to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

We assess collectability based on the creditworthiness of the customer and past transaction history. We perform on-going credit evaluations of, and do not require collateral from, our customers. A significant change in the liquidity or financial position of any one customer could make it more difficult for us to assess collectability.

Inventory Valuation

We write down the carrying value of our inventory to net realizable value for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory in an amount equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and its estimated realizable value based upon inventory age and assumptions about future demand and market conditions. We assess the valuation of all inventories, including raw materials, work-in-process, finished goods and spare parts on a periodic basis.

Obsolete inventory or inventory in excess of our estimated usage is written down to its estimated market value less costs to sell, if less than its cost. The inventory write-downs are recorded as an inventory valuation allowance established on the basis of obsolete inventory or specificspecifically identified inventory in excess of established usage. Inherent in our estimates of demand and market value in determining inventory valuation are estimates related to economic trends, future demand for our products and technological obsolescence of our products. If actual demand and market conditions are less favorable than our projections, additional inventory write-downs may be required. If the inventory value is written down to its net realizable value, and subsequently there is an increased demand for the inventory at a higher value, the increased value of the inventory is not realized until the inventory is sold either as a component of a subsystem or as separate inventory. For fiscal years 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, we wrote down inventory of $2.6 million, $2.3$3.3 million, and $2.4 million, respectively.


Accounting for Income Taxes

The determination of our tax provision is highly dependent upon the geographic composition of worldwide earnings and tax regulations governing each region and is subject to judgments and estimates. Management carefully monitors the changes in many factors and adjusts the effective tax rate as required. The carrying value of our net deferred tax assets, which consist primarily of future tax deductions, assumes we will be able to generate sufficient future income to fully realize these deductions. In determining whether the realization of these deferred tax assets may be impaired, we make judgments with respect to whether we are likely to generate sufficient future taxable income to realize these assets. In order to reverse a valuation allowance, accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America suggest that we review our recent cumulative income/loss as well as determine our ability to generate sufficient future taxable income to realize our net deferred tax assets. As of December 29, 2017,27, 2019, we maintained full valuation allowances on our U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets in the amount of $7.9$23.1 million as we believe it is more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will not be realized.


In addition, the calculation of tax liabilities involves significant judgment in estimating the impact of uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws. Resolution of these uncertainties in a manner inconsistent with our expectations could have a material impact on ourthe results of our operations and financial position. We believe we have adequately reserved for our uncertain tax positions,position, however, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different than what we expect. We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the closing of a tax audit or the refinement of an estimate. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will impact the provision for income taxes in the period in which such determination is made. The provision for income taxes includes the impact of reserve provisions and changes to reserves that are considered appropriate, as well as the related net interest.

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various states and foreign jurisdictions.  Our 20142016 through 20162018 federal income tax returns are open to audit through the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company’s 20132015 through 20162018 state income tax returns are open to audit by the California Franchise Tax Board. The Company is also subject to examination in various other jurisdictions for various periods.

Business Combinations

In accordance with accounting for business combinations, we allocate the purchase price of acquired companies to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. We may engage third-party valuation firms to assist management in reviewing management’s determination of the fair values of acquired intangible assets such as trade namecustomer relationships and customer relationships.tradenames. Such valuations require management to make significant estimates and assumptions. Management makes estimates of fair value based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable. These estimates are based on historical experience and information obtained from the management of the acquired companies and are inherently uncertain.

Goodwill, Intangibles Assets, and Long-lived Assets

Goodwill is measured as the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the sum of the amounts assigned to identifiable assets acquired less liabilities assumed.

We evaluate our goodwill and indefinite life trade nametradename for impairment on an annual basis, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be fully recoverable. In addition, we evaluate our identifiable intangible assets and other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:

Significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets or the strategy of our overall business;

Significant negative changes in revenue of specific products or services;

Significant negative industry or economic trends; and

Significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period; andperiod.


We continually apply judgment when performing these evaluations and continuously monitor for events and circumstances that could negatively impact the key assumptions in determining fair value, including long-term revenue growth projections, undiscounted net cash flows, discount rates, recent market valuations from transactions by comparable companies, volatility in our market capitalization and general industry, market and macroeconomic conditions. It is possible that changes in such circumstances, or in the variables associated with the judgments, assumptions and estimates used in assessing fair value, would require us to record a non-cash impairment charge.

Results of Operations

Fiscal Year

Our fiscal year is the 52- or 53-week period ending on the Friday nearest December 31. Fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017 each contained 52 weeks.

A discussion regarding our financial condition and results of operations for fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018 is presented below. A discussion regarding our financial condition and results of operations for fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017 can be found under Item 7 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2018, filed with the SEC on March 22, 2019, which is available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and our Investor Relations website at ww.uct.com/investors.

Discussion of Results of Operations

The financial information for SSB represents a full twelve months of QGT activity in 2019 compared to four months of activity in 2018 as QGT was acquired on August 27, 2018.

The financial information for SPS represents eight months of activity in 2019 for DMS as DMS was acquired on April 15, 2019.

Revenues

 

 

Years Ended

 

Revenues by Segment

 

December 27,

 

 

Percent

 

December 28,

 

 

Percent

 

December 29,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2019

 

 

Change

 

2018

 

 

Change

 

2017

 

SPS

 

$

840.8

 

 

 

(17.2

)

%

 

$

1,015.5

 

 

 

9.9

 

%

 

$

924.4

 

SSB

 

 

225.4

 

 

 

178.3

 

%

 

 

81.0

 

 

n/m

 

 

 

 

-

 

Total Revenues

 

$

1,066.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,096.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

924.4

 

SPS as a percentage of total revenues

 

 

78.9

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

92.6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100.0

%

SSB as a percentage of total revenues

 

 

21.1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.4

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

n/m = not meaningful

Total SPS revenues decreased in fiscal year 2019 over fiscal year 2018, primarily due to a slowdown in the semiconductor industry, in particular, the wafer fabrication equipment industry, partially offset by the acquisition of DMS which contributed $35.2 million of revenues in fiscal year 2019.


Assets heldTotal SSB revenues increased in fiscal year 2019 over fiscal year 2018, primarily due to the acquisition of QGT which contributed a full year of financial results in 2019 compared to four months of financial results in 2018.

 

 

Years Ended

 

Revenues by Geography

 

December 27,

 

 

Percent

 

December 28,

 

 

Percent

 

December 29,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2019

 

 

Change

 

2018

 

 

Change

 

2017

 

United States

 

$

510.9

 

 

 

7.5

 

%

 

$

475.3

 

 

 

10.9

 

%

 

$

428.6

 

International

 

555.3

 

 

 

(10.6

)

%

 

621.2

 

 

 

25.3

 

%

 

495.8

 

Total Revenues

 

$

1,066.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,096.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

924.4

 

Unites States as a percentage of total

   revenues

 

 

47.9

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

43.3

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

46.4

%

International as a percentage of

   total revenues

 

 

52.1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

56.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

53.6

%

On a geographic basis, revenues represent products shipped from or services performed in our U.S. and international locations.

United States revenue increased in absolute terms and as a percentage of total revenue due, in part, to our acquisition of DMS, whose customers are primarily based in the United States.

The decrease in foreign revenues in absolute terms and as a percentage of total revenue is due primarily to lower semiconductor demands.

Gross Margin

 

 

Years Ended

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

December 27,

 

 

Percent

 

December 28,

 

 

Percent

 

December 29,

 

Dollar by Segment

 

2019

 

 

Change

 

2018

 

 

Change

 

2017

 

SPS

 

$

121.8

 

 

 

(19.0

)

%

 

$

150.3

 

 

 

(10.4

)

%

 

$

167.7

 

SSB

 

 

75.0

 

 

 

194.1

 

%

 

25.5

 

 

n/m

 

 

 

 

-

 

Gross profit

 

$

196.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

175.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

167.7

 

Gross Margin Percentage by Segment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SPS

 

 

14.5

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14.8

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18.1

%

SSB

 

 

33.3

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31.5

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

n/m

 

Total Company

 

 

18.5

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18.1

%

Cost of revenues consists primarily of purchased materials, labor and overhead, including depreciation related to certain capital assets associated with the design and manufacture of products sold. SPS gross profit decreased in fiscal year 2019 compared to fiscal year 2018 due primarily to lower revenues. SPS gross margin decreased in fiscal year 2019 compared to fiscal year 2018, due primarily to a change in product mix with lower product margins. SSB gross profit increased in fiscal year 2019 compared to fiscal year 2018 due primarily to the acquisition of QGT which contributed a full year of financial results in 2019 compared to four months of financial results in 2018. SSB gross margin increased in fiscal year 2019 compared to fiscal year 2018 due primarily to a change in product mix as well as an improvement in labor efficiencies.

Research and Development

 

 

Years Ended

 

 

 

December 27,

 

 

Percent

 

December 28,

 

 

Percent

 

December 29,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2019

 

 

Change

 

2018

 

 

Change

 

2017

 

Research and development

 

$

14.6

 

 

 

9.8

 

%

 

$

13.3

 

 

 

13.7

 

%

 

$

11.7

 

Research and development

   as a percentage of total

   revenues

 

 

1.4

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.3

%


Research and development expenses consist primarily of activities related to new component testing and evaluation, test equipment and fixture development, product design, the advancement of cleaning and coating and analytical processes, and other product-development activities. Research and development expenses increased $1.3 million in fiscal year 2019 over fiscal year 2018, due primarily to the acquisition of QGT which contributed a full year of financial results in 2019 compared to four months of financial results in 2018.

Sales and Marketing

 

 

Years Ended

 

 

 

December 27,

 

 

Percent

 

December 28,

 

 

Percent

 

December 29,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2019

 

 

Change

 

2018

 

 

Change

 

2017

 

Sales and marketing

 

$

22.4

 

 

 

37.4

 

%

 

$

16.3

 

 

 

19.0

 

%

 

$

13.7

 

Sales and marketing as a

   percentage of total revenues

 

 

2.1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.5

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.5

%

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and commissions paid to our sales employees, salaries paid to our engineers who work with sales and service employees to help determine the components and configuration requirements for salenew products and other costs related to the sales of our products. Sales and marketing expenses increased $6.1 million in fiscal year 2019 over fiscal year 2018, due primarily to the acquisition of QGT which contributed a full year of financial results in 2019 compared to four months of financial results in 2018 and the inclusion of DMS’s partial year financial results of $0.8 million in fiscal year 2019.

General and Administrative

 

 

Years Ended

 

 

 

December 27,

 

 

Percent

 

December 28,

 

 

Percent

 

December 29,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2019

 

 

Change

 

2018

 

 

Change

 

2017

 

General and administrative

 

$

129.9

 

 

 

51.9

 

%

 

$

85.5

 

 

 

61.9

 

%

 

$

52.8

 

General and administrative as a

   percentage of total revenues

 

 

12.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.8

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.7

%

General and administrative expenses increased $44.4 million in fiscal year 2019 over fiscal year 2018, due to the acquisition of QGT which added $25.7 million of general and administrative expense during a full year of financial results in 2019 compared to four months of financial results in 2018, $14.8 million of restructuring expenses charged to operations in fiscal year 2019, and $10.5 million higher amortization of intangibles assets related to the acquisitions of QGT and DMS.

Non-currentInterest and Other Income (Expense), net

 

 

Years Ended

 

 

 

December 27,

 

 

Percent

 

December 28,

 

 

Percent

 

December 29,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2019

 

 

Change

 

2018

 

 

Change

 

2017

 

Interest income

 

$

0.4

 

 

 

33.3

 

%

 

$

0.3

 

 

 

200.0

 

%

 

$

0.1

 

Interest expense

 

$

(25.5

)

 

 

155.0

 

%

 

$

(10.0

)

 

 

354.5

 

%

 

$

(2.2

)

Other income (expense), net

 

$

(2.4

)

 

 

84.6

 

%

 

$

(1.3

)

 

 

(425.0

)

%

 

$

0.4

 

Interest expense increased in fiscal year 2019 over fiscal year 2018, due to a higher average debt balance and average interest rate on our new debt related to our acquisition of QGT.

Other income (expense), net increased in fiscal year 2019 over fiscal year 2018, primarily due to a $4.1 million net increase in fair value of the contingent earn-out liabilities recorded in conjunction with the acquisitions of DMS and QGT. The $4.1 million net increase is composed of the increase in DMS’s earn-out liability of $8.0 million since its acquisition date, offset by a $3.9 million reduction of the QGT earn-out liability. This net increase was offset by a $1.5 million decrease in fair value of our liability related to our obligation to purchase the common stock owned by one of the Cinos Korea shareholders.


Provision for Income Taxes

 

 

Years Ended

 

 

 

December 27,

 

 

Percent

 

December 28,

 

 

Percent

 

December 29,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2019

 

 

Change

 

2018

 

 

Change

 

2017

 

Provision for income taxes

 

$

10.0

 

 

 

(34.6

)

%

 

$

15.3

 

 

 

28.6

 

%

 

$

11.9

 

Effective tax rate

 

 

415.9

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29.3

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13.6

%

For fiscal year 2019, income tax expense was $10.0 million compared to $15.3 million for fiscal year 2018. For fiscal year 2019, our effective tax rate was 415.9% compared to 29.3% for fiscal year 2018. The change in respective tax rates reflects, primarily, changes in the geographic distribution of our worldwide earnings.  For fiscal year 2019, our effective tax rate was higher than the statutory rates primarily due to the effects of the geographic distribution of our worldwide earnings in foreign jurisdictions with different tax rates, unfavorable book to tax differences related to U.S. tax reform, primarily income in foreign jurisdictions which cannot be offset against losses in the U.S., which is in full valuation allowance.

For the year ended December 27, 2019, the Company concluded that a full valuation allowance against its U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets or disposal groups comprising assets and liabilities, that are expectedcontinues to be recovered primarily through sale or distribution rather than through continuing use, are classifiednecessary. The Company also concluded that some of its foreign deferred tax assets acquired as held for sale. Immediately before classification as held for sale or distribution, the assets, or components of a disposal group, are measured at the lowerpart of the carrying amount or fair value less costsQGT acquisition required a valuation allowance. As of December 27, 2019, the total U.S. and foreign valuation allowances for deferred tax assets was $23.1 million and $2.7 million, respectively.  

Our ability to sell. Impairment lossesrealize deferred tax assets depends on initial classification as held for saleour ability to generate sufficient future taxable income. In assessing our future taxable income, we have considered all sources of future taxable income available to realize our deferred tax assets, including the taxable income from future reversal of existing temporary differences, carry forwards, and subsequent gains and losses on remeasurement are recognizedtax-planning strategies. If changes occur in the statementassumptions underlying our tax planning strategies or in the scheduling of operations. Gains are not recognizedthe reversal of our deferred tax liabilities, the valuation allowance may need to be adjusted in excessthe future.

The Company remitted earnings from its subsidiaries in Singapore and China in 2019 and the Company has no future plans to remit earnings other than possibly remitting earnings out of any cumulative impairment loss. Once classified as heldits Singapore entity.  We may change our intent to reinvest our undistributed foreign earnings indefinitely, which could require us to accrue or pay taxes on some or all of these undistributed earnings.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and cash Equivalents

The following table summarizes our cash and cash equivalents:

 

 

Years Ended

 

 

 

December 27,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

Increase

 

Total cash and cash equivalents

 

$

162.5

 

 

$

144.1

 

 

$

18.4

 

The increase in cash and cash equivalents in fiscal year 2019 compared to fiscal year 2018 was primarily due to the cash provided by operating activities of $121.0 million, partially offset by the $29.9 million acquisition of DMS, $26.3 million used for sale, intangible assets andpurchases of property, plant and equipment are no longer amortized or depreciated.and net debt payments of $50.7 million.


Cash Flows

 

 

Years Ended

 

 

 

December 27,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

December 29,

 

(In millions)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Operating activities

 

$

121.0

 

 

$

41.7

 

 

$

48.9

 

Investing activities

 

 

(49.2

)

 

 

(345.9

)

 

 

(16.1

)

Financing activities

 

 

(53.4

)

 

 

380.1

 

 

 

(17.1

)

Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash

   equivalents

 

 

-

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

0.1

 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

$

18.4

 

 

$

75.8

 

 

$

15.8

 

Our primary cash inflows and outflows were as follows:

We generated net cash from operating activities of $121.0 million in fiscal year 2019, compared to $41.7 million in fiscal year 2018. The Company recognized$79.3 million increase was driven by an increase of $100.1 million in the net change from operating assets and liabilities and an increase of $23.9 million in non-cash items offset by a $0.7decrease of $44.7 million lossin net income.

The major contributors to the net change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisition, in fiscal year 2019 were as follows:

o

Accounts receivable increased $4.5 million primarily due to timing of collections.

o

Inventories decreased $22.3 million due primarily to lower SPS revenues together with better management of supply chain and inventories on hand.

o

Prepaid expenses and other current assets decreased $3.7 million due primarily to amortization of prepaid expenses.

o

Accounts payable increased $31.0 million, accrued compensation and related benefits increased $9.0 million, and other liabilities increased $6.3 million, primarily due to the timing of payments.

Cash used in investing activities was $49.2 million in fiscal year 2019 compared to $345.9 million in fiscal year 2018. During fiscal year 2019, net cash used for investing activities primarily consisted of $29.9 million for the DMS acquisition and $26.3 million for purchases of property, plant and equipment, offset by $7.0 million in proceeds from insurance and sale of property, plant and equipment. During fiscal year 2018, net cash used for investing activities primarily consisted of $319.8 million, net of cash acquired, for the QGT acquisition and $26.1 million for purchases of property, plant and equipment.

Cash used in financing activities was $53.4 million in fiscal year 2019 compared to cash provided by financing activities of $380.1 million in fiscal year 2018. During fiscal year 2019, net cash used in financing activities primarily consisted of $50.7 million net of debt repayments, $0.5 million finance leases payments, $0.6 million dividends payments made to a joint venture shareholder and $1.9 million of taxes paid upon reclassificationthe vesting of held for sale assetsrestricted stock units. During fiscal year 2018, the cash provided by financing activities primarily included net bank borrowings of $300.7 million and $94.3 million net cash proceeds from the public offering of our 3D printing businesscommon stock in Singapore (UAMC)February of 2018, offset by $12.1 million payment of debt issuance costs and $3.1 million of taxes paid upon vesting of restricted stock units.

We believe we have sufficient capital to fund our working capital needs, satisfy our debt obligations, maintain our existing capital equipment, purchase new capital equipment and make strategic acquisitions from time to time. As of December 27, 2019, we had cash of $162.5 million compared to $144.1 million as of December 30, 2016. The loss was recorded in cost of goods in the statements of operations. Total assets of UAMC at December 29, 2017 were $3.0 million.

Equity Incentives to Employees

We issue restricted stock units to our employees28, 2018. Our cash and outside directorscash equivalents, cash generated from operations and provide our employees the right to purchase common stockamounts available under our employee stock purchase plan. Under current accounting guidance, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair valuerevolving line of the award and is recognizedcredit described below were our principal sources of liquidity as expense over the service (vesting) period. See Note 9 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a detailed description.

Unaudited Quarterly Financial Results

The following table sets forth statement of operations data for the periods indicated. The information for each of these periods is unaudited and has been prepared on the same basis as our audited consolidated financial statements included herein and includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments that we consider necessary for a fair presentation of our unaudited operations data for the periods presented. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in the future (in thousands, except per share data):

 

 

First

 

 

Second

 

 

Third

 

 

Fourth

 

 

Fiscal

 

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Year (1)

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

$

 

204,594

 

 

$

 

228,261

 

 

$

 

242,610

 

 

$

 

248,886

 

 

$

 

924,351

 

Gross profit

 

$

 

37,495

 

 

$

 

43,371

 

 

$

 

42,696

 

 

$

 

44,067

 

 

$

 

167,629

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

 

14,341

 

 

$

 

20,179

 

 

$

 

19,716

 

 

$

 

20,849

 

 

$

 

75,085

 

Earnings (loss) per share — basic

 

$

 

0.43

 

 

$

 

0.60

 

 

$

 

0.59

 

 

$

 

0.62

 

 

$

 

2.25

 

Earnings (loss) per share — diluted

 

$

 

0.42

 

 

$

 

0.59

 

 

$

 

0.57

 

 

$

 

0.60

 

 

$

 

2.19

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

$

 

112,229

 

 

$

 

129,831

 

 

$

 

146,154

 

 

$

 

174,545

 

 

$

 

562,759

 

Gross profit

 

$

 

14,570

 

 

$

 

19,021

 

 

$

 

23,491

 

 

$

 

29,701

 

 

$

 

86,783

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

 

(3,239

)

 

$

 

723

 

 

$

 

2,614

 

 

$

 

9,953

 

 

$

 

10,051

 

Earnings (loss) per share — basic

 

$

 

(0.10

)

 

$

 

0.02

 

 

$

 

0.08

 

 

$

 

0.30

 

 

$

 

0.31

 

Earnings (loss) per share — diluted

 

$

 

(0.10

)

 

$

 

0.02

 

 

$

 

0.08

 

 

$

 

0.30

 

 

$

 

0.30

 

(1)

Earnings per share is calculated independently each quarter and for the full year based upon their respective weighted average shares outstanding. Therefore, the sum of the quarterly earnings per share may not equal the annual earnings per share reported.

Liquidity and Capital ResourcesDecember 27, 2019.

In February of 2018, we completed an underwritten public offering of 4,761,905 shares of our common stock, in which we received net proceeds of approximately $94.5$94.3 million, after deducting the underwriting discounts and offering expenses payable by us.


We believeIn August 2018, in conjunction with the acquisition of QGT, we have the required capital principally to fund our working capital needs, satisfy our debt obligations, maintain our equipmententered into a credit agreement with Barclays Bank that provided a Term Loan, a Revolving Credit Facility, and purchase new capital equipment. Asa Letter of December 29, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents of $68.3 million compared to $52.5 million as of December 30, 2016. The increase in our cash position during 2017 was primarily due to cash generated from operations, our principal source of liquidity as of December 29, 2017.

For the twelve months ended December 29, 2017, we generated cash from operating activities of $48.9 million, an increase of $31.3 million when compared to $17.6 million for fiscal 2016. Operating cash flows generated in the twelve months ended December 29, 2017 reflects net income adjusted for the effect of non-cash activities, including depreciation of equipment and leasehold improvements, amortization of intangible assets and debt issuance costs, excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation, stock-based compensation, loss from disposal of assets, change in the fair value of the Miconex contingent earn-out and changes in working capital components. The primary drivers of the increase in cash from operating activities from fiscal 2016 to fiscal 2017 included higher net income and increases in accounts payable, accrued expenses, income taxes payable and other liabilities, offset by higher increases in inventories, prepaid expenses, deferred income taxes and other non-current assets.

Cash generated from operating activities for fiscal year 2016 reflected an increase of $16.7 million when compared to $0.9 million for fiscal year 2015. Operating cash flows generated in the twelve months ended December 30, 2016 were from non-cash activities, including depreciation of equipment and leasehold improvements, amortization of intangible assets and debt issuance costs, excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation, stock-based compensation, loss from disposal of assets and change in the fair value of the contingent earn-out aggregating to $19.9 million. Operating cash flows were also generated by decreases in prepaid expenses and other and deferred tax assets, net and increases in accounts payable and accrued compensation of $1.7 million, $3.5 million, $31.7 million and $1.4 million, respectively. These were offset by increases in accounts receivable, inventory and other non-current assets of $15.8 million, $31.5 million and $0.1 million, respectively, and by the net decrease in income tax payable and other liabilities of $0.1 million and $3.4 million, respectively.

Net cash used in investing activities in fiscal year 2017 and 2016 was $16.1 million and $7.3 million, respectively, consisted mainly of purchases of equipment and leasehold improvements.

Net cash used in financing activities for the twelve months ended December 29, 2017, was $17.1 million, an increase of $9.2 million when compared to net cash used by financing activities of $7.9 million for the comparable period of 2016. The net cash used was primarily due to principal payments on bank borrowings of $31.2 million offset by $15.1 million proceeds from bank borrowings. For the twelve month period ended December 30, 2016, our net cash used in financing activities was primarily due to $14.3 million principal payments on borrowings offset by $6.7 million cash proceeds from bank borrowings.Credit Facility (the “Credit Facilities”).  See further discussion under Borrowing Arrangements below.

We anticipate that our existing cash and cash equivalents balance and operating cash flow will be sufficient to service our indebtedness and meet our working capital requirements and technology development projects for at least the next twelve months. The adequacy of these resources to meet our liquidity needs beyond that period will depend on our growth, the size and number of any acquisitions, the state of the worldwide economy, our ability to meet our financial covenants with our credit facility, the cyclical expansion or contraction of the semiconductor capital equipment industry and the other industries we serve and capital expenditures required to meet possible increased demand for our products.

In order to expand our business or acquire additional complementary businesses or technologies, we may need to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings. If required, additional financing may not be available on terms that are favorable to us, if at all. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, our stockholders’ equity interest will be diluted and these securities might have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our current stockholders. We may also require the consent of our new lenders to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings. No assurance can be given that additional financing will be available or that, if available, such financing can be obtained on terms favorable to our stockholders and us.


In 2017, we determined that a portion of the current year and future year earnings of one of our China subsidiaries may be remitted in the future to one of our foreign subsidiaries outside of mainland China and, accordingly, we provided for the related withholding taxes in our consolidated financial statements. As of December 29, 2017,27, 2019, we had undistributed earnings of approximately $217.0 million from our foreign subsidiaries that are indefinitely invested outside of the U.S. of approximately $176.7 million. It is not practicable to determine the income tax liability that might be incurred if these earnings were to be distributed. We anticipate that we have adequate liquidity and capital resources and would not need to repatriate additional earnings to the U.S. As of December 29, 2017,27, 2019, we have cash of approximately $67.8$126.7 million in our foreign subsidiaries.

Borrowing Arrangements

We have

 

 

December 27,

 

 

 

2019

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Amount

 

 

Weighted-

Average

Interest Rate

 

U.S. Term Loan

 

$

300.0

 

 

6.9%

 

U.S. Revolving Credit Facility

 

 

-

 

 

4.7%

 

FDS Revolving Credit Facility

 

 

1.9

 

 

1.0%

 

 

 

$

301.9

 

 

 

 

 

In August 2018, we entered into a credit facilities in the U.S.agreement with Barclays Bank that provided a Term Loan, a Revolving Credit Facility and Czech Republic that expire on February 2, 2019 and March 31, 2020, respectively.a Letter of Credit Facility (the “Credit Facility”). We and certainsome of our subsidiaries have agreed to secure all of our and their respective obligations under a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”)the Credit Facility by granting a first priority lien in substantially all of our and their respective personal property assets (subject to certain exceptions and limitations).

As of December 29, 2017, In connection with this Credit Facility, we have outstanding amountsborrowed $350.0 million under the U.S. Term Loan and Revolvingused the proceeds, together with cash on hand, to finance the acquisition of QGT (see Note 2) and to refinance our previous credit facilities.

In August 2018, we paid $41.6 million of principal, accrued interest, and fees in settlement of the then-outstanding term loan, revolving credit facility, interest rate swap under the Credit facilityAgreement, and recognized $0.1 million in expense upon extinguishment of $9.9debt as Interest and other income (expense), net.

The Term Loan has a maturity date of August 27, 2025, with monthly interest payments in arrears, quarterly principal payments of 0.625% of the original outstanding principal balance payable beginning in January 2019, with the remaining principal paid upon maturity. The Term Loan accrues interest daily at a rate equal to a base LIBOR rate determined by reference to the London interbank offered rate for dollars, plus 4.5% (subject to certain adjustments quarterly based upon the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio). At December 27, 2019, we had an outstanding amount under the Term Loan of $300.0 million, and $39.9 million, respectively, which are gross of unamortized debt issuance costs of $0.2$9.7 million. As of December 27, 2019, the interest rate on the outstanding Term Loan was 6.2%. On December 31, 2021, LIBOR will officially be phased out.  The aggregate principal amountCompany will work with its bank to determine alternative risk-free rates.


The Revolving Credit Facility has an initial available commitment of $65.0 million and a maturity date of August 27, 2023. We pay a quarterly commitment fee in arrears equal to 0.25% of the average daily available commitment outstanding. During the second quarter of 2019, we borrowed $15.0 million under the Revolving Credit facility is $40.0 million. AsFacility to fund the acquisition of DMS, and as of December 29, 2017, interest rates on27, 2019, we had no amount outstanding under the outstanding U.S. Term Loan and Revolving Credit facility were 3.57% and 3.75%, respectively.Facility.

In order to manage interest rate risk on the variable component of the Term LoanThe New Credit Agreement requires that we entered into an interest rate swap with the Lenders in September 2015 with a total notional amount of $20.0 million (which amount decreases based on prorated quarterly principal payment over the remaining period of the Term Loan) pursuant to which we pay the counterparty a fixed rate of 0.99% and receive interest at a variable rate equal to the LIBOR rate we are required to pay under our Term Loan, or 1.57%, as of December 29, 2017. This interest rate swap effectively locked in a fixed interest rate of 2.99% on $7.8 million of the $9.9 million term loan balance outstanding as of December 29, 2017.

We are required to maintain certain financial covenants with our U.S. Credit facility including a consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio (as defined in the New Credit Agreement) as of the last day of any fiscal quarter of at least 1.25 to 1.00, and a consolidated leverage ratio (as defined in the New Credit Agreement) as of the last day of any fiscal quarter of no greater than 3.53.75 to 1.00 and a minimum cash balance of $35.0 million at the end of each quarter.1.00. We were in compliance with all covenants for the quarter ended December 29, 2017. 27, 2019.

The Letter of Credit Agreement also restricts us from declaring or paying any cash dividends.Facility has an initial available commitment of $50.0 million and a maturity date of August 27, 2023. We pay quarterly in arrears a fee equal to 2.5% (subject to certain adjustments as per the Term Loans) of the dollar equivalent of all outstanding letters of credit, and a fronting fee equal to 0.125% of the undrawn and unexpired amount of each letter of credit. As of December 27, 2019, we have no outstanding letters of credit and the remaining available commitments was $65.0 million.

As of December 29, 2017, Miconex27, 2019, FDS had an outstanding amount under aits revolving credit facility of 2.21.7 million euros (approximately $2.7$1.9 million) with an interest rate of 1.3% plus0.9%.

We have partial ownership in a variable rate based onSouth Korean company, Cinos Korea, Ltd (“Cinos”), which Cinos has Credit Agreements with various banks that provide Revolving Credit Facilities for a total available commitment of 1.9 billion Korean Won (approximately $1.7 million) with annual renewals beginning in April 2020 through October 2020 and interest rates ranging from 1.4% - 5.4%.  During the Euro Interbank Offered Rate.fiscal year ended December 27, 2019, borrowings under these Revolving Facilities were insignificant and no amounts were outstanding as of December 27, 2019.

As of December 29, 2017,27, 2019, our total bank debt was $52.4$292.2 million, net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $9.7 million. As of December 27, 2019, we had $65.0 million and we have $0.1 million and 6.06.5 million euros (approximately $7.2$7.3 million) available to borrow ondraw from our revolving credit facilities in the U.S. and Czech Republic, respectively.

The fair value of our long term debt was based on Level 2 inputs, and fair value was determined using quoted prices for similar liabilities in inactive markets. The carrying value of our long term debt approximates fair value.

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditures were $18.5$25.7 million for the year ended December 29, 2017,27, 2019, primarily attributable to the expansion of our South Korea, Singapore, Czech Republic and certain U.S. facilities.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

During the periods presented, we diddo not have any relations with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.

In conjunction with the sale of our products in the ordinary course of business, we provide standard indemnification against certain liabilities, which may include claims of losses by their own customers resulting out of property damages, bodily injuries or deaths, or infringement of intellectual property rights by our products. Our potential liability arising out of intellectual property infringement claims by any third party is generally uncapped. As of December 27, 2019, we have not incurred any significant costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification arrangements. As a result, we believe the estimated fair value of these arrangements is minimal.


Contractual Obligations

Other than operating leases for certain equipment and real estate and purchase order commitments primarily for inventory, we have no off-balance sheet transactions unconditional purchase obligations or similar instruments and, other than the arrangements described under “Borrowing Arrangements” above and our stock purchase obligation resulted from the acquisition of QGT, are not a guarantor of any other entities’ debt or other financial obligations. The following table summarizes our future minimum lease payments, principal payments under debt obligations and our purchase obligations for the purchase of inventory as of December 29, 2017:27, 2019:

 

 

Total

 

 

Less than

1 Year

 

 

1 - 3

Years

 

 

3 - 5

Years

 

 

More than

5 Years

 

(In millions)

 

Total

 

 

Fiscal Year

2020

 

 

Fiscal Years

2021 - 2022

 

 

Fiscal Years

2023 - 2024

 

 

Beyond

 

Operating leases(1)

 

$

 

25,863

 

 

$

 

7,162

 

 

$

 

10,523

 

 

$

 

8,062

 

 

$

 

116

 

 

$

 

49.2

 

 

$

 

15.1

 

 

$

 

20.7

 

 

$

 

7.1

 

 

$

 

6.3

 

Borrowing Arrangement(2)

 

 

 

52,439

 

 

 

 

12,533

 

 

 

 

39,906

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

301.9

 

 

 

 

10.7

 

 

 

 

17.5

 

 

 

 

17.5

 

 

 

 

256.2

 

Purchase order commitments(3)

 

 

 

186,509

 

 

 

 

186,509

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock purchase obligation(3)

 

 

 

6.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase order commitments(4)

 

 

 

139.9

 

 

 

 

139.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

 

264,811

 

 

$

 

206,204

 

 

$

 

50,429

 

 

$

 

8,062

 

 

$

 

116

 

 

$

 

497.8

 

 

$

 

165.7

 

 

$

 

45.0

 

 

$

 

24.6

 

 

$

 

262.5

 

 

(1)

Operating lease obligations reflects (a) theThe Company leases for our headquarters and manufacturing facilities in Hayward, California that expire in 2020 through 2022; (b) the leases for manufacturing facilities in South San Francisco that expire in 2018; (c) the leases for manufacturing facilities in China, Singapore and the Philippines that expire in 2017 through 2022; (d) the leases for manufacturing facilities in Austin, Texas that expire in 2021; (e) the leases for manufacturing facilities in Chandler, Arizona that expire in 2022; and (g) the leases for our manufacturing facilities in the Czech RepublicU.S.A. as well as internationally under non-cancellable leases that expires in 2019. We have options to renew certain of the leases in South San Francisco, Hayward, Austin, Singapore and Czech Republic which we expect to exercise.expire on various date through 2031.

(2)

Amounts reflect obligations under our Revolving Credit FacilityTerm loan amounting to $300.0 gross of $0.2$9.7 million of unamortized debt issuance costs under which $9.9 million is outstanding under the Term Loan and approximately $39.9 million under the Revolving Credit Facility as of December 29, 2017 and of our bank debt of $2.7$1.9 million held by Miconex,FDS, in the Czech Republic.

(3)

The Company is obligated to purchase the common stock owned by one of Cinos’ shareholders. See Note 10 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(4)

Represents our outstanding purchase orders primarily for inventory.

Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncement

For a description of recent accounting pronouncements, including the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects, if any, on UCT’s consolidated financial statements, see Note 1, “Organization and Significant Accounting Policies,” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to financial market risks, including changescredit risk, foreign currency exchange rate risk and interest rate risk.

Credit Risk

A substantial majority of our trade receivables are derived from sales to OEMs. We believe the net accounts receivable balances from our three largest customers (66.7% as of December 27, 2019) do not represent a significant credit risk, based on cash flow forecasts, balance sheet analysis, and past collection experience. For more information about the customers that represent our accounts receivable balance, see Note 1, Organization and Significant Accounting Policies.

We have adopted credit policies and standards intended to accommodate industry growth and inherent risk. We believe credit risks are moderated by the financial stability of our major customers. We assess credit risk through quantitative and qualitative analysis. From these analysis, we establish shipping and credit limits and determine whether we will seek to use one or more credit support protection devices, such as obtaining a parent guarantee, prepayment or standby letter of credit.


Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

We operate in international markets, which expose us to market risk associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations between the U.S. Dollar and various foreign currencies. Historically, the majority of our revenue contracts and arrangements with third party suppliers are denominated in U.S. Dollars. Additionally, a portion of our expenses, primarily the cost to manufacture, cost of personnel to deliver technical support on our products and professional services, sales and sales support and research and development, are denominated in foreign currencies. Revenue resulting from selling in currencies and costs incurred in local currencies are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations which can affect our operating income. As foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates.

Foreign Exchange Rates

Currently, a significant majority of our sales and arrangements with third-party suppliers provide for pricing and payment in US dollars, which are not subject to material exchange rate fluctuations.vary, operating income may differ from expectations. Increases in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies would make our products more expensive relative to competing products priced in such other currencies, which could negatively impact our ability to compete. Conversely, decreases in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies could result in our foreign suppliers raising their prices in order to continue doing business with us. However, we do not expect foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations to have a material effect on our results of operations.

Chinese authorities recently relaxed controls of China’s currency, the Renminbi, and allowed the currency to strengthen against other world currencies, including the U.S. dollar. We continue to monitor any potential impact of the depreciation or appreciation of the Renminbi on our operations in China as well as globally. Changes in the value of the Renminbi did not have a material impact on our results of operations for any period presented in this Form 10-K.


MiconexFDS uses derivative instruments, such as foreign currency exchange contracts, to hedge certain exposures to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. These contracts reduce, but do not entirely eliminate the impact of currency exchange rates movement on Miconex’sFDS’ assets and liabilities.

Interest RatesRate Risk

OurWe are exposed to market risk due to the possibility of changing interest rate risk relates primarily to outstanding amountsrates under our termcredit facilities. Our Credit Facility is comprised of a Term B loan and a revolving credit facilities which totaled $52.3 million (net of debt issuance costs) as of December 29, 2017, and carriesagreement with interest rates peggedas described under Note 8 of Notes to either the prime rate, LIBOR or EURIBOR. To reduce our exposure to potentially rising interest rates, on September 17, 2015,Consolidated Financial Statements.

At the end of fiscal 2019, we entered into an interest rate swap with the Lenders, encompassing $20.0 million ofhad outstanding the Term Loan. TheB loan of $300.0 million. A hypothetical 10% increase in our borrowing rates at the end of fiscal 2019 could result in approximately $1.9 million annual increase in interest rate swap exchanges the variable interest rate component where LIBOR was at 1.57% as of December 29, 2017, with a fixed interest rate of 0.99% over the remaining term of the Term Loan. This interest rate swap is designated as a cash flow hedge of the interest rate risk attributable to forecasted variable interest payments.expense on these existing principal balances.

 


Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

4448

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 29, 201727, 2019 and December 30, 201628, 2018

4650

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 27, 2019,  December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017,  December 30, 2016 and December 25, 2015

4751

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 27, 2019,  December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017,  December 30, 2016 and December 25, 2015

4852

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 27, 2019,  December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017

53

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 27, 2019,  December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017,  December 30, 2016 and December 25, 2015

49

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 29, 2017,  December 30, 2016 and December 25, 2015

5054

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

5155

 


REPORTSREPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of

Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 29, 201727, 2019 and December 30, 2016,28, 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years ended December 29, 2017,27, 2019, December 30, 201628, 2018 and December 25, 2015,29, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 29, 2017,27, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 29, 201727, 2019 and December 30, 201628, 2018, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years ended December 27, 2019, December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017 December 30, 2016 and December 25, 2015,, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses identified below on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 29, 2017,27, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for leases in 2019.

Basis for Opinions

The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A.9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures to respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.



As discussed in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, on April 15, 2019, the Company acquired Dynamic Manufacturing Solutions, LLC (DMS). For the purposes of assessing internal control over financial reporting, management excluded DMS, whose financial statements constitute 3.0% of the Company’s consolidated total assets (excluding $18.5 million of goodwill and intangible assets, which were integrated into the Company’s control environment), and 3.3% of consolidated revenues as of and for the year ended December 27, 2019. Accordingly, our audit did not include the internal control over financial reporting of DMS.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weaknesses have been identified and included in management’s assessment in Item 9A:

The Company did not design and maintain effective controls within its Semiconductor Services Business segment due to deficiencies in the design and implementation of business process controls and information technology general controls relating to all relevant accounts and cycles of this segment as of December 27, 2019.

We considered the material weaknesses in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 27, 2019, and our opinion on such consolidated financial statements was not affected.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Moss Adams LLP

San Francisco, California

March 14, 2018

11, 2020

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015.

 


Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

 

December 29,

 

 

December 30,

 

 

December 27,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

(In thousands, except share

and per share amounts)

 

(In millions, except par value)

(In millions, except par value)

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

 

68,306

 

 

$

 

52,465

 

 

$

162.5

 

 

$

144.1

 

Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $69 and $65, respectively

 

 

90,213

 

 

 

74,663

 

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $0.3 at

December 27, 2019 and $0.1 at December 28, 2018

 

 

112.7

 

 

 

107.0

 

Inventories

 

 

236,840

 

 

 

103,861

 

 

 

172.4

 

 

 

186.1

 

Prepaid expenses and other

 

 

 

12,089

 

 

 

 

6,461

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

19.4

 

 

 

25.7

 

Total current assets

 

 

 

407,448

 

 

 

 

237,450

 

 

 

467.0

 

 

 

462.9

 

Equipment and leasehold improvements, net

 

 

 

32,246

 

 

 

 

18,858

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

145.3

 

 

 

143.5

 

Goodwill

 

 

85,248

 

 

 

85,248

 

 

 

171.1

 

 

 

150.2

 

Purchased intangibles, net

 

 

31,587

 

 

 

37,024

 

Intangibles assets, net

 

 

180.3

 

 

 

193.5

 

Deferred tax assets, net

 

 

4,951

 

 

 

1,355

 

 

 

15.5

 

 

 

10.2

 

Operating lease right-of-use assets

 

 

34.9

 

 

 

Other non-current assets

 

 

 

1,932

 

 

 

 

762

 

 

 

5.2

 

 

 

5.2

 

Total assets

 

$

 

563,412

 

 

$

 

380,697

 

 

$

1,019.3

 

 

$

965.5

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bank borrowings

 

$

 

12,381

 

 

$

 

16,819

 

 

$

8.8

 

 

$

9.7

 

Accounts payable

 

 

173,521

 

 

 

71,189

 

 

 

133.1

 

 

 

99.0

 

Accrued compensation and related benefits

 

 

10,788

 

 

 

7,904

 

 

 

24.8

 

 

 

15.8

 

Deferred rent, current portion

 

 

670

 

 

 

634

 

Operating lease liabilities

 

 

13.2

 

 

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

 

9,987

 

 

 

 

4,515

 

 

 

30.7

 

 

 

14.8

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

 

207,347

 

 

 

 

101,061

 

 

 

210.6

 

 

 

139.3

 

Bank borrowings, net of current portion

 

 

 

39,893

 

 

 

 

50,931

 

 

 

283.4

 

 

 

331.6

 

Deferred tax liability

 

 

9,981

 

 

 

9,917

 

Deferred rent and other liabilities

 

 

 

5,886

 

 

 

 

2,657

 

Deferred tax liabilities

 

 

25.2

 

 

 

15.8

 

Operating lease liabilities

 

 

28.8

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

 

18.8

 

 

 

27.8

 

Total liabilities

 

 

 

263,107

 

 

 

 

164,566

 

 

 

566.8

 

 

 

514.5

 

Commitments and contingencies (See Note 12)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock — $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 authorized; none

outstanding

 

 

 

 

Common stock — $0.001 par value, 90,000,000 authorized;

33,664,940 and 32,956,285 shares issued and outstanding,

in 2017 and 2016, respectively

 

 

34

 

 

 

33

 

Commitments and contingencies (See Note 9)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

UCT stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock — $0.001 par value, 10.0 authorized; none

outstanding

 

 

 

 

Common stock — $0.001 par value, 90.0 authorized; 39.9 and 39.1 shares

issued and outstanding at December 27, 2019 and December 28, 2018,

respectively

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.1

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

188,639

 

 

 

181,781

 

 

 

300.9

 

 

 

290.4

 

Common shares held in treasury, at cost, 601,944 shares in 2017 and

2016

 

 

(3,337

)

 

 

(3,337

)

Common shares held in treasury, at cost, 0.6 shares at December 27, 2019

and December 28, 2018

 

 

(3.3

)

 

 

(3.3

)

Retained earnings

 

 

113,122

 

 

 

38,037

 

 

 

140.3

 

 

 

149.7

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

1,847

 

 

 

 

(383

)

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

(0.6

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

 

300,305

 

 

 

 

216,131

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

 

563,412

 

 

$

 

380,697

 

Total UCT stockholders' equity

 

 

436.7

 

 

 

436.3

 

Noncontrolling interests

 

 

15.8

 

 

 

14.7

 

Total equity

 

 

452.5

 

 

 

451.0

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

1,019.3

 

 

$

965.5

 

 

(See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements)


Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

December 29,

 

 

December 30,

 

 

December 25,

 

 

December 27,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

December 29,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

Sales

 

$

924,351

 

 

$

562,759

 

 

$

469,103

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

756,722

 

 

 

475,976

 

 

 

398,073

 

Gross profit

 

 

167,629

 

 

 

86,783

 

 

 

71,030

 

(In millions, except per share amounts)

(In millions, except per share amounts)

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product

 

$

840.8

 

 

$

1,015.5

 

 

$

924.4

 

Services

 

 

225.4

 

 

 

81.0

 

 

 

-

 

Total revenues

 

 

1,066.2

 

 

 

1,096.5

 

 

 

924.4

 

Cost of revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product

 

 

719.0

 

 

865.2

 

 

756.7

 

Services

 

150.4

 

 

55.5

 

 

 

-

 

Total cost revenues

 

869.4

 

 

920.7

 

 

756.7

 

Gross margin

 

 

196.8

 

 

 

175.8

 

 

 

167.7

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development

 

 

11,666

 

 

 

9,900

 

 

 

9,578

 

 

14.6

 

 

13.3

 

 

11.7

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

13,748

 

 

 

11,568

 

 

 

11,499

 

 

22.4

 

 

16.3

 

 

13.7

 

General and administrative

 

 

52,818

 

 

 

42,924

 

 

 

44,112

 

 

 

129.9

 

 

85.5

 

 

52.8

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

78,232

 

 

 

64,392

 

 

 

65,189

 

 

 

166.9

 

 

115.1

 

 

78.2

 

Income from operations

 

 

89,397

 

 

 

22,391

 

 

 

5,841

 

 

 

29.9

 

 

60.7

 

 

89.5

 

Interest and other income (expense), net

 

 

(2,455

)

 

 

(3,444

)

 

 

(2,234

)

Interest income

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.1

 

Interest expense

 

 

(25.6

)

 

 

(10.0

)

 

 

(2.2

)

Other income (expense), net

 

 

(2.4

)

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

(0.4

)

Income before provision for income taxes

 

 

86,942

 

 

 

18,947

 

 

 

3,607

 

 

 

2.3

 

 

 

52.3

 

 

 

87.0

 

Income tax provision

 

 

11,857

 

 

 

8,896

 

 

 

14,339

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

10.0

 

 

15.3

 

 

11.9

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

75,085

 

 

$

10,051

 

 

$

(10,732

)

 

 

(7.7

)

 

 

37.0

 

 

75.1

 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

-

 

Net income (loss) attributable to UCT

 

$

(9.4

)

 

$

36.6

 

 

$

75.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per share attributable to UCT common stockholders:

Net income (loss) per share attributable to UCT common stockholders:

 

Basic

 

$

2.25

 

 

$

0.31

 

 

$

(0.34

)

 

$

(0.24

)

 

$

0.95

 

 

$

2.25

 

Diluted

 

$

2.19

 

 

$

0.30

 

 

$

(0.34

)

 

$

(0.24

)

 

$

0.94

 

 

$

2.19

 

Shares used in computing net income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

33,409

 

 

 

32,632

 

 

 

31,564

 

 

 

39.5

 

 

 

38.4

 

 

 

33.4

 

Diluted

 

 

34,303

 

 

 

33,150

 

 

 

31,564

 

 

 

39.5

 

 

 

38.9

 

 

 

34.3

 

 

(See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements)


Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

December 29,

 

 

December 30,

 

 

December 25,

 

 

December 27,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

December 29,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

(In millions)

(In millions)

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

 

75,085

 

 

$

 

10,051

 

 

$

 

(10,732

)

 

$

(7.7

)

 

$

37.0

 

 

$

75.1

 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in cumulative translation adjustment

 

 

1,193

 

 

 

(393

)

 

 

(5

)

 

 

(0.4

)

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

1.2

 

Change in pension net actuarial loss

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

 

 

Cash flow hedges:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of derivatives

 

 

1,274

 

 

 

(60

)

 

 

23

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

1.2

 

Adjustment for net gain (loss) realized and included in net

income

 

 

 

(237

)

 

 

 

88

 

 

 

 

(36

)

Adjustment for net loss realized and included in net income

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1.0

)

 

 

(0.2

)

Total change in unrealized gain (loss) on derivative

instruments

 

 

 

1,037

 

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

(13

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1.1

)

 

 

1.0

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

2,230

 

 

 

 

(365

)

 

 

 

(18

)

Comprehensive income (loss)

 

$

 

77,315

 

 

$

 

9,686

 

 

$

 

(10,750

)

Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

(2.4

)

 

 

2.2

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, attributable

to noncontrolling interests

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

-

 

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to UCT

 

$

(10.1

)

 

 

34.2

 

 

 

77.3

 

 

(See notes to consolidated financial statements)


Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

Paid-in

 

 

Retained

 

 

Comprehensive

 

 

Stockholders’

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Capital

 

 

Earnings

 

 

(Loss) Income

 

 

Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands, except share amounts)

 

Balance December 26, 2014

 

 

29,562,338

 

 

$

 

30

 

 

$

 

149,804

 

 

$

 

38,718

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

188,552

 

Issuance of restricted common stock

 

 

56,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance under employee stock plans

 

 

763,529

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,411

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,411

 

Amortization of stock-based

   compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,660

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,660

 

Excess tax benefit from stock-based

   compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(77

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(77

)

Employees’ taxes paid upon vesting

   of  restricted stock units

 

 

(39,938

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(330

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(330

)

Common stock issued for

   acquisitions

 

 

1,937,500

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

17,475

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,477

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,732

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,732

)

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(18

)

 

 

 

(18

)

Balance December 25, 2015

 

 

32,279,429

 

 

 

 

32

 

 

$

 

172,943

 

 

$

 

27,986

 

 

$

 

(18

)

 

$

 

200,943

 

Issuance of restricted common stock

 

 

52,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance under employee stock plans

 

 

761,824

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

601

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

602

 

Amortization of stock-based

   compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,671

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,671

 

Employees’ taxes paid upon vesting

   of  restricted stock units

 

 

(136,968

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(771

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(771

)

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,051

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,051

 

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(365

)

 

 

 

(365

)

Balance December 30, 2016

 

 

32,956,285

 

 

$

 

33

 

 

$

 

178,444

 

 

$

 

38,037

 

 

$

 

(383

)

 

$

 

216,131

 

Issuance of restricted common stock

 

 

45,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance under employee stock plans

 

 

823,440

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

1,815

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,816

 

Amortization of stock-based

   compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,757

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,757

 

Employees’ taxes paid upon vesting

   of  restricted stock units

 

 

(159,785

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,714

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,714

)

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75,085

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75,085

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,230

 

 

 

 

2,230

 

Balance December 29, 2017

 

 

33,664,940

 

 

$

 

34

 

 

$

 

185,302

 

 

$

 

113,122

 

 

$

 

1,847

 

 

$

 

300,305

 

(Seeaccompanying notes to consolidated financial statements)


Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

December 29,

 

 

December 30,

 

 

December 25,

 

 

December 27,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

December 29,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

(In thousands)

 

(In millions)

(In millions)

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

 

75,085

 

 

$

 

10,051

 

 

$

 

(10,732

)

 

$

(7.7

)

 

$

37.0

 

 

$

75.1

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by

operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by

operating activities (excluding assets acquired, liabilities

assumed and noncontrolling interests at acquisition):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

5,275

 

 

 

5,981

 

 

 

4,728

 

 

 

21.5

 

 

 

11.5

 

 

 

5.3

 

Amortization of finite-lived intangibles

 

 

 

5,437

 

 

 

5,758

 

 

 

6,212

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

20.1

 

 

 

9.6

 

 

 

5.4

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

12.1

 

 

 

10.3

 

 

 

7.8

 

Amortization of debt issuance costs

 

 

 

153

 

 

 

153

 

 

 

829

 

 

 

1.8

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

0.2

 

Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

771

 

 

 

77

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

7,757

 

 

 

5,671

 

 

 

3,660

 

Loss from disposal of fixed assets

 

 

 

72

 

 

 

169

 

 

 

Change in the fair value of the contingent earn out

 

 

 

(278

)

 

 

1,446

 

 

 

(449

)

Loss on the disposal of assets and business

 

 

2.0

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

-

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

(3.6

)

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(3.8

)

Change in the fair value of financial instruments

 

 

2.8

 

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

(0.3

)

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

 

(14,930

)

 

 

(15,834

)

 

 

5,818

 

 

 

(4.5

)

 

 

7.2

 

 

 

(14.9

)

Inventories

 

 

 

(131,874

)

 

 

(31,516

)

 

 

(8,329

)

 

 

22.3

 

 

 

50.2

 

 

 

(131.9

)

Prepaid expenses and other

 

 

 

(4,911

)

 

 

1,709

 

 

 

(948

)

Deferred income taxes

 

 

 

(3,755

)

 

 

3,534

 

 

 

10,352

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

3.7

 

 

 

2.6

 

 

 

(4.9

)

Other non-current assets

 

 

 

(582

)

 

 

(45

)

 

 

(24

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(0.4

)

 

 

(0.6

)

Accounts payable

 

 

 

99,569

 

 

 

31,705

 

 

 

(12,593

)

 

 

31.0

 

 

 

(83.2

)

 

 

99.6

 

Accrued compensation and related benefits

 

 

 

2,777

 

 

 

1,397

 

 

 

798

 

 

 

9.0

 

 

 

(2.8

)

 

 

2.8

 

Income taxes payable

 

 

 

8,177

 

 

 

(16

)

 

 

(77

)

 

 

(2.9

)

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

8.2

 

Operating lease assets and liabilities

 

 

7.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

 

 

933

 

 

 

 

(3,357

)

 

 

 

1,604

 

 

 

6.3

 

 

 

(2.5

)

 

 

0.9

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

 

48,905

 

 

 

 

17,577

 

 

 

 

926

 

 

 

121.0

 

 

 

41.7

 

 

 

48.9

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of equipment and leasehold improvements

 

 

 

(16,149

)

 

 

(7,278

)

 

 

(10,152

)

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

 

 

(26.3

)

 

 

(26.1

)

 

 

(16.1

)

Proceeds from sale of equipment, including insurance proceeds

 

 

7.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(45,064

)

 

 

(29.9

)

 

 

(319.8

)

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

 

(16,149

)

 

 

 

(7,278

)

 

 

 

(55,216

)

 

 

(49.2

)

 

 

(345.9

)

 

 

(16.1

)

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from bank borrowings

 

 

 

15,076

 

 

 

6,657

 

 

 

79,212

 

 

 

41.8

 

 

 

387.1

 

 

 

15.0

 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

 

 

 

1,816

 

 

 

602

 

 

 

2,411

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

94.6

 

 

 

1.8

 

Principal payments on bank borrowings

 

 

 

(31,248

)

 

 

(14,341

)

 

 

(55,205

)

Principal payments on bank borrowings and finance leases

 

 

(93.0

)

 

 

(86.4

)

 

 

(31.2

)

Payments of debt issuance costs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(611

)

 

 

 

 

 

(12.1

)

 

 

 

Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(77

)

Payments of dividends to a joint venture shareholder

 

 

(0.6

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employees’ taxes paid upon vesting of restricted stock units

 

 

 

(2,714

)

 

 

 

(771)

 

 

 

 

(331

)

 

 

(1.9

)

 

 

(3.1

)

 

 

(2.7

)

Net cash used in financing activities

 

 

 

(17,070

)

 

 

 

(7,853

)

 

 

 

25,399

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 

(53.4

)

 

 

380.1

 

 

 

(17.1

)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

 

 

155

 

 

 

 

(84

)

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

0.1

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash

 

 

 

15,841

 

 

 

 

2,362

 

 

 

 

(28,894

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

 

 

52,465

 

 

 

 

50,103

 

 

 

 

78,997

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 

$

 

68,306

 

 

$

 

52,465

 

 

$

 

50,103

 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

18.4

 

 

 

75.8

 

 

 

15.8

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

 

144.1

 

 

 

68.3

 

 

 

52.5

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

 

162.5

 

 

$

144.1

 

 

$

68.3

 

Supplemental cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income taxes paid

 

$

 

7,614

 

 

$

 

4,463

 

 

$

 

2,900

 

Income tax refunds

 

$

 

71

 

 

$

 

646

 

 

$

 

622

 

Income taxes paid, net of income tax refunds

 

$

14.5

 

 

$

14.5

 

 

$

7.5

 

Interest paid

 

$

 

2,216

 

 

$

 

2,505

 

 

$

 

2,163

 

 

$

23.6

 

 

$

7.1

 

 

$

2.2

 

Non-cash investing and financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of common shares issued for acquisition

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

17,661

 

Fair value of earn-out payments related to Miconex acquisition

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

1,280

 

Restricted stock issued

 

$

 

13,080

 

 

$

 

2,986

 

 

$

 

2,950

 

Equipment and leasehold improvements purchased included in

accounts payable and other current liabilities

 

$

 

2,558

 

 

$

 

701

 

 

$

 

153

 

Property, plant and equipment purchased included in accounts payable

and other liabilities

 

$

5.0

 

 

$

5.6

 

 

$

2.6

 

Impairment loss due to a facility fire covered by insurance

 

$

 

 

$

6.0

 

 

$

 

Note receivable received in exchange for sale of UAMC

 

$

 

 

$

0.3

 

 

$

 

Fair value of earn-out payment related to business acquisitions

 

$

1.4

 

 

$

4.2

 

 

$

 

 

(See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements)


Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

Treasury shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Additional

Paid-in

Capital

 

 

 

  Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Retained

Earnings

 

 

Accumulated

Other

Comprehensive

Income (Loss)

 

 

Total

Stockholders’

Equity of UCT

 

 

Noncontrolling

Interests

 

 

Total

Equity

 

(In millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance December 30, 2016

 

 

33.0

 

 

$

0.1

 

 

$

181.7

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

$

(3.3

)

 

$

38.0

 

 

$

(0.4

)

 

$

216.1

 

 

$

 

 

$

216.1

 

Issuance of restricted common stock

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance under employee stock plans

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

 

 

1.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.8

 

 

 

 

 

1.8

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.8

 

 

 

 

 

7.8

 

Employees’ taxes paid upon vesting of

   restricted stock units

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

 

 

(2.7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2.7

)

 

 

 

 

(2.7

)

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75.1

 

 

 

 

 

75.1

 

 

 

 

 

75.1

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

 

 

2.2

 

Balance December 29, 2017

 

 

33.7

 

 

$

0.1

 

 

$

188.6

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

$

(3.3

)

 

$

113.1

 

 

$

1.8

 

 

$

300.3

 

 

$

 

 

$

300.3

 

Issuance under employee stock plans

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

0.3

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.3

 

 

 

 

 

10.3

 

Employees’ taxes paid upon vesting of

   restricted stock units

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

 

 

(3.1

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3.1

)

 

 

 

 

(3.1

)

Issuance of common stock in public

   offering

 

 

4.8

 

 

 

 

 

94.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

94.3

 

 

 

 

 

94.3

 

Noncontrolling interests from acquisition

   of QGT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14.3

 

 

 

14.3

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36.6

 

 

 

 

 

36.6

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

37.0

 

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2.4

)

 

 

(2.4

)

 

 

 

 

(2.4

)

Balance December 28, 2018

 

 

39.1

 

 

$

0.1

 

 

$

290.4

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

$

(3.3

)

 

$

149.7

 

 

$

(0.6

)

 

$

436.3

 

 

$

14.7

 

 

$

451.0

 

Issuance under employee stock plans

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

0.3

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

12.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12.1

 

 

 

 

 

12.1

 

Employees’ taxes paid upon vesting of

   restricted stock units

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

 

 

(1.9

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.9

)

 

 

 

 

(1.9

)

Net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9.4

)

 

 

 

 

(9.4

)

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

(7.7

)

Dividend payments to a joint venture

   shareholder

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.6

)

 

 

(0.6

)

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

 

 

(0.7

)

Balance December 27, 2019

 

 

39.9

 

 

$

0.1

 

 

$

300.9

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

$

(3.3

)

 

$

140.3

 

 

$

(1.3

)

 

$

436.7

 

 

$

15.8

 

 

$

452.5

 

(See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements)

 

 


Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Organization and Significant Accounting PoliciesORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization

Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc., (the “Company” or “UCT”) a Delaware corporation, was founded in November 2002 for the purpose of acquiring Ultra Clean Technology Systems and Service, Inc. Ultra Clean Technology Systems and Service, Inc. was founded in 1991 by Mitsubishi Corporation and was operated as a subsidiary of Mitsubishi until November 2002, when it was acquired by UCT. UCT became a publicly traded company on the NASDAQ Global Market in March 2004. Ultra Clean Technology (Shanghai) Co., LtdThe Company is a global leader in the design, engineering, and manufacture of production tools, modules and subsystems for the semiconductor capital equipment industry and industry segments with similar requirements including display, consumer and medical. The Company focuses on providing specialized engineering and manufacturing solutions for these applications.

Historically, the Company has operated under one operating segment. However, as a result of the acquisition of QGT, the Company created an additional segment in the first quarter of 2019. The Company elected to reorganize its organizational and reporting structure to capture efficiencies and operating leverage from its recent acquisition of QGT. The Company now reports results for two segments: Semiconductor Products and Solutions (“UCTS”Products” or “SPS”) and Ultra Clean Micro-Electronics Equipment (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.Semiconductor Services Business (“UCME”Services” or “SSB”) were established in 2005 and 2007, respectively, to facilitate.

Through the Company’s operations in China. In December 2015, UCTS merged into UCME. Ultra Clean Asia Pacific, Pte, Ltd. (Singapore) was established in fiscal year 2008 to facilitate the Company’s operations in Singapore. In July 2012, UCT acquired American Integrationacquisition of Quantum Global Technologies, LLC (“AIT”QGT”) in August 2018, the Company is also a provider of ultra-high purity outsourced parts cleaning, process tool part recoating, surface treatment and analytical services to addthe semiconductor and related industries.

On April 15, 2019, the Company purchased substantially all of the assets of Dynamic Manufacturing Solutions, LLC ("DMS"), a semiconductor weldment and solutions provider. DMS reports into the SPS segment. See Note 2 to the Company’s existing customer base inConsolidated Financial Statements for further information about the semiconductoracquisitions of QGT and medical spaces and to provide additional manufacturing capabilities. In February 2015, UCT acquired Marchi Thermal Systems, Inc. (“Marchi”), a designer and manufacturer of specialty heaters, thermocouples and temperature controllers. Marchi delivers flexible heating elements and thermal solutions to our customers. The Company believes heaters are increasingly critical in equipment design for the most advanced semiconductor nodes. In July 2015, UCT acquired MICONEX s.r.o. (“Miconex”), a privately-held provider of advanced precision fabrication of plastics, primarily for the semiconductor industry that, initially, is expected to expand the Company’s capabilities with existing customers.DMS.

Principles of Consolidation — The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and all intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Fiscal Year

The Company uses a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the Friday nearest December 31. All references to quarters refer to fiscal quarters and all references to years refer to fiscal years.

Principles of Consolidation

The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and all intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Noncontrolling interests

Noncontrolling interests are recognized to reflect the portion of the equity of the majority-owned subsidiaries which is not attributable, directly or indirectly, to the controlling stockholder. Through the acquisition of QGT in August 2018, the Company’s consolidated entities include partially-owned entities. These partially-owned entities are (1) Cinos Co., Ltd (“Cinos Korea”), a South Korean company that provides outsourced cleaning and recycling of precision parts for the semiconductor industry through its operating facilities in South Korea, 86.0% of whose equity interests the Company is obligated to purchase and whose results the Company consolidates and (2) Cinos Xian Clean Technology, Ltd. (“Cinos China”), a Chinese entity that is 60.0% owned by Cinos. The interest held by others in Cinos Korea and in Cinos China are presented as noncontrolling interests in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements. The noncontrolling interests will continue to be attributed its share of gains and losses even if that attribution results in a deficit noncontrolling interests balance.


Segments

The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) guidance regarding disclosure about segments in an enterprise and related information establishes standards for the reporting by public business enterprises of information about reportable segments, products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. The method for determining what information to report is based on the manner in which management organizes the reportable segments within the Company for making operational decisions and assessments of financial performance. The Company’s chief operating decision-maker is the Chief Executive Officer. In March 2019, the Company effected a change in the reporting of its segment financial results to better reflect the reorganization within the Company due to the acquisition of QGT. The Company now operates and reports two segments. See Note 15 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Foreign Currency Translation and Remeasurement

The Company has one foreign subsidiary whose functional currency of UCT Fluid Delivery Solutions s.r.o. (“FDS") is not its local currency or the U.S. dollar.Euro. The Company remeasures the monetary assets and liabilities of this subsidiary intoFDS from its local currency to its functional currency. Gains and losses from these remeasurements are recorded in interest and other income (expense), net. The Company then translates the assets and liabilities of this subsidiaryFDS into the U.S. dollar. Gains and losses from these translations are recognized in foreign currency translation included in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) within UCT stockholders’ equity.

The functional currency of the Company’s other international subsidiaries are either the U.S. dollar or their local currency. For the Company’s foreign subsidiaries where the local currency is the functional currency, the Company translates the financial statements of these subsidiaries to U.S. dollars using month-end exchange rates for assets and liabilities, and average rates of exchange for revenue, costs and expenses. Translation gains and losses are recorded in AOCI as a component of stockholders' equity. For the Company’s foreign subsidiaries where the U.S. dollar is the functional currency, any gains and losses resulting from the translation of the assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are recorded in interest and other income (expense), net.

Use of Accounting Estimates

The presentation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosures of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Such estimates and assumptions include reserves onrevenue recognition, inventory valuation, accounting for income taxes, business combinations, valuation of deferred taxgoodwill, intangible assets and impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets. The Company bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances. However, future events are subject to change and the best estimates and judgments routinely require adjustment.adjustments. Actual amounts may differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers currency on hand, demand deposits, time deposits, and all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents are held in various financial institutions in the United States and internationally.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments which subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company sells its products and provides services primarily to semiconductor capital equipment manufacturers in the United States. The Company performs credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and generally requires no collateral.


Significant Sales to CustomersThe Company’s most significant customers (having accounted for 10% or more of sales)related) and their related salesrevenues as a percentage of total sales for each of the previous three years,revenues were as follows:

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

2017

 

 

Lam Research Corporation

 

59.8

 

%

 

53.3

 

%

 

50.6

 

%

 

 

41.7

 

%

 

 

55.1

 

%

 

59.8

 

%

Applied Materials, Inc.

 

24.6

 

 

 

28.9

 

 

 

26.4

 

 

 

25.2

 

 

 

21.5

 

 

 

24.6

 

 

Total

 

 

84.4

 

%

 

 

82.2

 

%

 

 

77.0

 

%

 

 

66.9

 

%

 

 

76.6

 

%

 

 

84.4

 

%

TwoThree customers’ accounts receivable balances:balances, Lam Research Corporation, and Applied Materials, Inc. and ASM International, Inc., were individually greater than 10%10.0% of total accounts receivable as of December 29, 201727, 2019 and December 30, 2016 and,28, 2018, in the aggregate represented approximately 75.8%66.7% and 85.0%62.9% of accounts receivable, at December 29, 2017 and December 30, 2016, respectively.

Fair Value of Measurements

The Company measures its cash equivalents interest rate derivative contracts and contingent earn-out liabilityliabilities at fair value on a recurring basis. In August 2018, the Company extinguished its debt with East West Bank, and as a result, the interest rate swap contract was consequently cancelled. Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that is determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value are measured and classified in accordance with a three-tier fair value hierarchy based on the observability of the inputs available in the market used to measure fair value:

Level 1 — Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 — Inputs that are based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant inputs are observable in the market or can be derived from observable market data. Where applicable, these models project future cash flows and discount the future amounts to a present value using market-based observable inputs including interest rate curves, foreign exchange rates, and credit ratings.

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activities.

The fair value hierarchy requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The following table summarizes, for assets or liabilities measured at fair value, the respective fair value and the classification by level of input within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurement at

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reporting Date Using

 

Description

 

December 29,

2017

 

 

Quoted Prices in

Active

Markets for

Identical Assets

(Level 1)

 

 

Significant

Other

Observable

Inputs

(Level 2)

 

 

Significant Unobservable

Inputs

(Level 3)

 

Other assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap

 

$

30

 

 

$

 

 

$

30

 

 

$

 

Forward contracts

 

$

1,302

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,302

 

 

$

 


 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurement at

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reporting Date Using

 

Description

 

December 30,

2016

 

 

Quoted Prices in

Active

Markets for

Identical Assets

(Level 1)

 

 

Significant

Other

Observable

Inputs

(Level 2)

 

 

Significant Unobservable

Inputs

(Level 3)

 

Other assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap

 

$

15

 

 

$

 

 

$

15

 

 

$

 

Other liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap

 

$

6

 

 

$

 

 

$

6

 

 

$

 

Contingent earn-out liability

 

$

278

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

278

 

 

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company recognizes derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. The Company records changes in the fair value of the derivatives in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations as interest and other income (expense), net, or as a component of AOCI in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost (which approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis) or net realizable value. The Company evaluates the valuation of all inventories, including raw materials, work-in-process, finished goods and spare parts on a periodic basis. Obsolete inventory or inventory in excess of management’s estimated usage is written-down to its estimated market value less costs to sell, if less than its cost. Inherent in the estimates of market value are management’s estimates related to economic trends, future demand for products, and technological obsolescence of the Company’s products.

Inventory write downs inherently involve judgments as to assumptions about expected future demand and the impact of market conditions on those assumptions. Although the Company believes that the assumptions it used in estimating inventory write downs are reasonable, significant changes in any one of the assumptions in the future could produce a significantly different result. There can be no assurances that future events and changing market conditions will not result in significant increases in inventory write downs.


At December 29, 2017Property, Plant andEquipment

Property, plant and December 30, 2016, inventory balances were $236.8 million and $103.9 million, respectively, net of reserves of $7.9 million and $6.9 million, respectively. The inventory write-downs are recorded as an inventory valuation allowance established on the basis of obsolete inventory or specific identified inventory in excess of estimated usage. For fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015, inventory write-downs were $2.6 million, $2.3 million and $2.4 million.

Equipment and Leasehold Improvements — Equipment and leasehold improvementsequipment are stated at cost, or, in the case of equipment under capitalfinance leases, the present value of future minimum lease payments at inception of the related lease. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method and declining balance methods over the lesser of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the terms of the leases. Useful lives range from three to fifteenfifty years.

Internal use software Direct costs incurred to develop software for internal use are capitalized and amortized over an estimated useful life of three or fiveten years. Costs related to the design or maintenance of internal use software are expensed as incurred. Capitalized internal use software is included in computer equipment and software.

ConstructionLong-lived Assets 

The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in progress — Construction in progress is relatedcircumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset group may not be recoverable. The Company assesses the fair value of the assets based on the amount of the undiscounted future cash flows that the assets are expected to generate and recognizes an impairment loss when estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the constructionuse of the asset are less than the carrying value of the asset. If the Company identifies an impairment, the Company reduces the carrying value of the group of assets to comparable market values, when available and appropriate, or developmentto its estimated fair value based on a discounted cash flow approach.

At the end of fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company assessed the useful lives of its long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment as well as its intangible assets and concluded that hasno impairment was required.

Leases 

The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease, or contains a lease, at the inception of the arrangement. When the Company determines the arrangement is a lease, or contains a lease, at lease inception, it then determines whether the lease is an operating lease or a finance lease. Operating and finance leases with lease terms of one year or greater result in the Company recording a right-of-use (ROU) asset and lease liability on its balance sheet. ROU assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent its obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating and finance lease ROU assets and liabilities are initially recognized based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. In determining the present value of lease payments, the Company uses the implicit interest rate if readily determinable or when the implicit interest rate is not yet been placed in service for their intended usereadily determinable, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate. The incremental borrowing rate is not a commonly quoted rate and is therefore, not depreciated. Construction in progress currently includes capitalized costs related toderived through a combination of inputs including the Company’s new enterprise reporting system implementation project.credit rating and the impact of full collateralization. The incremental borrowing rate is based on the Company’s collateralized borrowing capabilities over a similar term of the lease payments. The Company utilizes the consolidated group incremental borrowing rate for all leases. The operating lease ROU asset also includes any lease payments made and excludes any lease incentives. Specific lease terms used in computing the ROU assets and lease liabilities may include options to extend or terminate the lease when the Company believes it is reasonably certain that it will exercise that option. Lease expense for operating lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. As allowed by the guidance, the Company has elected not to recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities that arise from short-term (12 months or less) leases for any class of underlying asset. Operating leases are included in operating lease ROU assets, other current liabilities, and long-term operating lease liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The Company’s finance leases at December 27, 2019 are immaterial.

Goodwill and Indefinite Lived Intangible Assets

Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but are reviewed for impairment annually. Intangible assets are presented at cost, net of accumulated amortization, and are amortized on either a straight-line method or on an accelerated method over their estimated future discounted cash flows. The Company reviews goodwill and purchased intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable, such as when reductions in demand or significant economic slowdowns in the semiconductor industry are present. There were no impairments of the Company’s goodwill and purchased intangible assets in fiscal year 2019.


Product WarrantyDeferred Debt Issuance Costs

Debt issuance costs incurred in connection with obtaining debt financing are deferred and presented as a direct deduction from Bank Borrowings in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Costs incurred in connection with revolving credit facilities and letter of credit facilities are deferred and presented as an offset to bank borrowings in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Deferred costs are amortized on an effective interest method basis over the contractual term.

Defined Benefit Plan

Through the acquisition of QGT, the Company has a noncontributory defined benefit plan covering substantially all of the employees of one of its foreign entities upon termination of their employee services. For further discussion of the Company’s defined benefit plan see Note 8 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Revenue Recognition

On December 30, 2017, the Company adopted Topic 606 using the modified retrospective method to value those contracts which were not completed as of December 30, 2017.  The adoption of Topic 606 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Revenue is recognized when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to the Company’s customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The Company providesassesses collectability based on the credit worthiness of the customer and past transaction history. The Company performs on-going credit evaluations of customers and generally does not require collateral from customers.

Shipping and Handling Costs

Shipping and handling costs are included as a warranty on its productscomponent of cost of revenues.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense 

The Company maintains stock-based compensation plans which allow for a periodthe issuance of upequity-based awards to two years,executives and certain employees. These equity-based awards include stock options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units. The Company also maintains an employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”) that provides for warranty costs at the timeissuance of sale based on historical activity. Determinationshares to all eligible employees of the warranty reserve requires the Company to make estimates of product return rates and expected costs to repair or replace the products under warranty. If actual return rates and/or repair and replacement costs differ significantly from these estimates, adjustments to recognize additional cost of sales may be required in future periods. The warranty reserve is included in other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.at a discounted price.

Income Taxes

The Company utilizes the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes, under which deferred taxes are determined based on the temporary differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using tax rates expected to be in effect during the years in which the basis differences reverse. Deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements, which will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future. In evaluating our ability to realize our deferred tax assets within the jurisdiction from which they arise, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax-planning strategies, and results of recent operations. In projecting future taxable income, we begin with historical results and incorporate assumptions about the amount of future state, federal, and foreign pretax operating income adjusted for items that do not have tax consequences. The assumptions about future taxable income require significant judgment and are consistent with the plans and estimates we are using to manage the underlying businesses. In evaluating the objective evidence that historical results provide, we consider recent cumulative income (loss). A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.


During the quarter ended December 29, 201727, 2019 the Company performed a twelve quarter analysis of its U.S. cumulative pretax profit position as of December 29, 201727, 2019 and, weighing both positive and negative evidence, determined that it is more likely than not that the Company will not have the ability to generate sufficient taxable income over the foreseeable future to realize its U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets. Therefore, during the quarter ended December 29, 2017,27, 2019, the Company continues to believe that a valuation allowance is required on its U.S. federal and state net deferred tax assets. The total U.S. federal and state valuation allowance as of December 29, 201727, 2019 was $7.9$23.1 million.

During the quarter ended December 29, 2017, the Company has concluded that a full valuation allowance against one of its Singapore subsidiaries’ deferred tax assets continues to be necessary.  The total valuation allowance of the Singapore loss entity as of December 29, 2017 is $0.2 million.

The Company’s ability to realize deferred tax assets depends on its ability to generate sufficient future taxable income within the carryback or carry forward periods.income. In assessing the Company’s future taxable income, the Company considered all sources of future taxable income available to realize its deferred tax assets, including the taxable income from future reversal of existing temporary differences, carry forwards taxable income in carryback years and tax-planning strategies. If changes occur in the assumptions underlying the Company’s tax planning strategies or in the scheduling of the reversal of its deferred tax liabilities, the valuation allowance may need to be adjusted in the future.

The Company had a total valuation allowance on its net deferred tax assets in the amount of $8.1$25.8 million and $23.8$7.7 million as of December 29, 201727, 2019 and December 30, 2016,28, 2018, respectively.

Income tax positions must meet a more likely than not recognition threshold to be recognized. Income tax positions that previously failed to meet the more likely than not threshold are recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is met. Previously recognized tax positions that no longer meet the more likely than not threshold are derecognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is no longer met. The Company recognizes potential accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the consolidated statements of income as income tax expense. The calculation of tax liabilities involves significant judgment in estimating the impact of uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws. Resolution of these uncertainties in a manner inconsistent with the Company’s expectations could have a material impact on its results of operations and financial position. Management believes that it has adequately provided for any adjustments that may result from these examinations; however, the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty.


Revenue Recognition — Product revenue is generally recorded upon shipment. In arrangements that specify title transfer upon delivery, revenue is not recognized until ownership is transferred to the customer. The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, shipment has occurred, price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. If the Company has not substantially completed a product or fulfilled the terms of a sales agreement at the time of shipment, revenue recognition is deferred until fulfillment. The Company’s standard arrangement for its customers includes a signed purchase order or contract, no right of return of delivered products and no customer acceptance provisions.

The Company assesses collectability based on the credit worthiness of the customer and past transaction history. The Company performs on-going credit evaluations of customers and generally does not require collateral from customers.

Research and Development Costs — Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

Net Income per Share

Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and common equivalent shares from dilutive stock options and restricted stock using the treasury stock method, except when such shares are anti-dilutive (see Note 1014 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

Segments — The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) guidance regarding disclosure about segments in an enterprise and related information establishes standards for the reporting by public business enterprises of information about reportable segments, products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. The method for determining what information to report is based on the manner in which management organizes the reportable segments within the Company for making operational decisions and assessments of financial performance. The Company’s chief operating decision-maker is considered to be the Chief Executive Officer. The Company operates in one reporting segment, and therefore, has one reportable segment.

Business Combinations

The Company recognizes assets acquired (including goodwill and identifiable intangible assets), liabilities assumed and liabilities assumednoncontrolling interest at fair value on the acquisition date. Subsequent changes to the fair value of such assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recognized in earnings, after the expiration of the measurement period, a period not to exceed 12 months from the acquisition date. Acquisition-related expenses and acquisition-related restructuring costs are recognized in earnings in the period in which they are incurred.

Stock-based compensation

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Beginning in fiscal 2019, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)" and as part of that process the Company made the following elections:

The Company maintains stock-based compensation plans which allowdid not elect to use hindsight for transition when considering judgments and estimates such as assessments of lessee options to extend or terminate a lease or purchase the issuanceunderlying asset.

For all asset classes, the Company elected to not recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability for leases with a term of equity-based awards12 months or less.


For all asset classes, the Company elected to not separate non-lease components from lease components to which they relate and have accounted for the combined lease and non-lease components as a single lease component.

In March 2018, the FASB approved an optional transition method that allows companies to executives and certain employees. These equity-based awards include stock options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units.use the effective date as the date of initial application on transition. The Company also maintainselected this transition method, and as a result, will not adjust its comparative period financial information or make the newly required lease disclosures for periods before the effective date.

The Company determines if an employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”) that provides forarrangement is a lease at inception. Operating leases are included in the issuance of shares to all eligible employees ofConsolidated Balance Sheet as right-of-use assets from operating leases, current operating lease liabilities and long-term operating lease liabilities. Finance leases, which are not material, are included in property, plant and equipment, other current liabilities and other non-current liabilities in the Company at a discounted price.

Stock-based compensation expense includes compensation costs related to estimated fair values of stock options, units and awards granted. Stock-based compensation expense from stock options, restricted stock units and stock awards and the related income tax benefit recognized were $7.8 million and $1.1 million, respectively, for fiscal year 2017, $5.7 million and $2.7 million, respectively, for fiscal year 2016 and $3.7 million and $0.5 million, respectively, for fiscal year 2015.

The estimated fair valueConsolidated Balance Sheet. Most of the Company’s equity-based awards, netlease agreements contain renewal options; however, the Company did not recognize right-of-use assets or lease liabilities for renewal periods unless it is determined that we are reasonably certain of expected forfeitures, is amortized overrenewing the awards’ vesting periodlease at inception or when a triggering event occurs. Some of the Company’s lease agreements contain rent escalation clauses, rent holidays, capital improvement funding or other lease concessions. The Company recognizes minimum rental expense on a straight-line basis based on the fixed components of a lease arrangement. The Company amortizes this expense over the term of the lease beginning with the date of initial possession, which is the date the Company enters the leased space and begins to make improvements in preparation for its intended use. Variable lease components represent amounts that are not fixed in nature and are not tied to an index or rate, and are recognized as incurred.

In determining right-of-use assets and lease liabilities, the Company applied a discount rate to the minimum lease payments within each lease agreement. Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 842 requires companies to use the rate of interest that a lessee would have to pay to borrow on a collateralized basis over a weighted averagesimilar term, an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment. When the Company cannot readily determine the discount rate implicit in the lease agreement, the Company utilizes its incremental borrowing rate. For additional information on the required disclosures related to the impact of adopting this standard, see Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Adoption of the new standard resulted in the recording of operating lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities at the beginning of 2019 of $35.6 million and $38.5 million, respectively, with the difference due to deferred rent that was reclassified to the right of use asset value. 

All other newly issued and effective accounting standards during 2019 were not relevant or significant to the Company.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. This standard simplifies the accounting for income taxes by eliminating certain exceptions to the guidance in Topic 740 related to the approach for intraperiod tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period and the recognition of four yearsdeferred tax liabilities for stock options, three yearsoutside basis differences. The new guidance also simplifies aspects of the accounting for restricted stock unitsfranchise taxes and one year for restricted stock awards and will be adjusted for subsequentenacted changes in estimated forfeiturestax laws or rates and future option grants.

clarifies the accounting for transactions that result in a step-up in the tax basis of goodwill and allocating consolidated income taxes to separate financial statements of entities not subject to income tax. ASU 2019-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. Upon adoption, the Company must apply certain aspects of this standard retrospectively for all periods presented while other aspects are applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Company uses historical data to estimate pre-existing forfeitures, and records stock-based compensation for those awards thatis currently evaluating the impact of this new standard on its consolidated financial statements.

Although there are expected to vest atseveral other new accounting pronouncements issued by the timeFASB, the Company does not believe any of grant and revises those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.these accounting pronouncements had or will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.


The stockholders2. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

Quantum Global Technologies, LLC

On August 27, 2018, the Company acquired all of the Company approvedoutstanding preferred and common units of QGT, a provider of ultra-high purity parts cleaning, process tool part recoating, surface treatment and analytical services to the semiconductor and related industries, for total purchase consideration of $340.8 million, including an increaseestimated $4.2 million in the numbercontingent consideration related to $15.0 million of shares available for issuance under our amended and restated stock incentive plan by 1,500,000, 3,100,000 and 2,700,000 on June 10, 2010, May 22, 2013 and May 21, 2017, respectively.

There were no employee stock option grants bypotential cash earn-out payments if the Company for years 2017, 2016 and 2015. Generally, options vest over four years and expire no later than ten years fromachieves certain specified revenue levels through December 27, 2019. For the grant date. During fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015,twelve months ended December 27, 2019, the Company recorded $6.7 million, $3.0 million and $3.2 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense, net of tax, associated with employee and director stock plans and employee stock purchase plan programs. As of December 29, 2017, there was $12.4 million, net of forfeitures of $3.0incurred approximately $2.6 million of unrecognized compensation costcosts related to employeethe acquisition, which were expensed as incurred and director stock which is expected to be recognized on a straight-line basis over a weighted average period of approximately 1.55 years,recorded as general and will be adjusted for subsequent changes in estimated forfeitures and future grants.

Total stock-based compensation during the fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, to various expense categories was as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

December 29,

 

 

December 30,

 

 

December 25,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Cost of goods sold (1)

 

$

 

1,499

 

 

$

 

1,254

 

 

$

 

1,175

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

 

617

 

 

 

 

463

 

 

 

414

 

Research and development

 

 

219

 

 

 

281

 

 

 

202

 

General and administrative

 

 

 

5,422

 

 

 

 

3,673

 

 

 

 

1,869

 

 

 

 

 

7,757

 

 

 

 

5,671

 

 

 

 

3,660

 

Income tax benefit

 

 

 

(1,055

)

 

 

 

(2,660

)

 

 

 

(487

)

Net stock-based compensation expense

 

$

 

6,702

 

 

$

 

3,011

 

 

$

 

3,173

 

(1)

Stock-based compensation expenses capitalized in inventory for fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015 were considered immaterial.

Intangible Assets

Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but are reviewed for impairment annually. Purchased intangible assets are presented at cost, net of accumulated amortization, and are amortized on either a straight-line method or on an accelerated method over their estimated future discounted cash flows.administrative operating expense. The Company reviews goodwillcompleted this acquisition primarily in order to diversify the Company’s customer base, to create a wafer-starts-based recurring revenue stream, and purchased intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment annuallyto expand the Company’s addressable market. The Company borrowed $350.0 million to finance the acquisition and whenever events or changesto refinance its existing indebtedness. See further discussion of the new borrowing arrangements in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable, such as when reductions in demand or significant economic slowdowns in the semiconductor industry are present.

Intangible assets reviews are performed to determine whether the carrying value is impaired, based on comparisons to undiscounted expected future cash flows. If this comparison indicates that there is impairment, the impaired asset is written down to fair value, which is typically calculated using: (i) quoted market prices or (ii) discounted expected future cash flows utilizing a discount rate. See Note 56 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.Statements.

Goodwill is recordedThe fair value of the earn-out at the acquisition date was determined using the Monte Carlo Simulation model, which incorporated risk adjusted revenue projections. These inputs are not observable in the market and thus represent a Level 3 measurement as discussed in Note 4 to the difference, if any, betweenNotes to Consolidated Financial Statements. During the aggregate consideration paid for an acquisition andfiscal year 2019, the Company reassessed the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired.earn-out payments. The Company tests goodwill for impairment atfair value decreased from $3.9 million as of December 28, 2018 to nil as of December 27, 2019 as QGT did not achieve the reporting unit level (operating segment or one level below an operating segment) on an annual basisspecified performance target. The decrease in the fourth quarterrecorded liability of each fiscal year or more frequently if$3.9 million was recorded as other income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

In 2019, the Company believes indicatorscompleted its analysis of impairment exist. The performance of the test involves a two-step process. The first step of the impairment test involves comparing the fair values of the applicable reporting units with their aggregate carrying values, including goodwill. The Company generally determines the fair value of the Company’s reporting units usingproperty, plant and equipment acquired and the income approach methodologyimpact on depreciation expense from the acquisition date through the end of valuation that includes the discounted cash flow methodthird quarter of 2019 and, as well as other generally accepted valuation methodologies. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value,result, the Company performs the second step of the goodwill impairment test to determine the amount of impairment loss. The second step of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the implied fair value of the affected reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying value of that goodwill. The Company would then recordrecorded a charge based on the results of the second step.


Long-lived Assets

The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changesreduction in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset group may not be recoverable. The Company assesses the fair value of thefixed assets based on the amount of the undiscounted future cash flows that the assets are expected to generateapproximately $0.9 million and recognizes an impairment loss when estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the usea reduction in previously recorded depreciation expense of the asset are less than the carrying value of the asset. Ifapproximately $0.2 million. In addition, the Company identifies an impairment, the Company reduces the carrying value of the group of assets to comparable market values, when available and appropriate, or tocompleted its estimated fair value based on a discounted cash flow approach.

At the end of fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company assessed the useful lives of its long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment as well as its intangible assets and concluded that no impairment was required, except for UAMC assets, as discussed below.

Non-current assets, or disposal groups comprising assets and liabilities, that are expected to be recovered primarily through sale rather than through continuing use, are classified as held for sale. Immediately before classification as held for sale or distribution, the assets, or components of a disposal group, are measured at the lower of the carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell. Impairment losses on initial classification as held for sale and subsequent gains and losses on remeasurement are recognized in the statement of operations. Gains are not recognized in excess of any cumulative impairment loss. Once classified as held for sale, intangible assets and property, plant and equipment are no longer amortized or depreciated.

In November 2016, the Company determined to seek to dispose of a portion of its 3D printing business in Singapore (UAMC). This plan is consistent with the Company’s strategy to focus on producing products for the semiconductor capital equipment industry. The Company recognized a $0.7 million loss on reclassification of the assets of UAMC as held for sale as at December 30, 2016. This loss was recorded in cost of goods in the statements of operations. The total assets of UAMC at December 29, 2017 were $3.0 million.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB amended the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. Following the FASB's finalization of a one year deferral, this standard is now effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company will adopt this standard in the first quarter of fiscal year 2018. The Company performed an assessmentanalysis of the impact of the new accounting standardintangible assets acquired on its consolidated financial statementsworldwide tax position and recorded deferred tax liabilities that resulted in an increase to goodwill of approximately $7.6 million. During the quarter ended September 27, 2019, the Company completed the purchase price allocation for the QGT acquisition. The following table summarizes the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:

Fair Market Values (In millions)

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

19.0

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

24.2

 

Inventories

 

 

0.5

 

Prepaid expenses and other

 

 

12.3

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

 

100.1

 

Goodwill

 

 

73.5

 

Intangible assets

 

 

171.5

 

Total assets acquired

 

 

401.1

 

Accounts payable

 

 

(9.0

)

Accrued compensation and related benefits

 

 

(7.9

)

Other current liabilities

 

 

(7.4

)

Deferred tax liability

 

 

(8.5

)

Other liabilities

 

 

(13.2

)

Total liabilities assumed

 

 

(46.0

)

Noncontrolling interests

 

 

(14.3

)

Fair value of net assets acquired

 

$

340.8

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchased

 

 

 

Useful

Life

 

 

Intangible

Assets

 

 

 

(In years)

 

 

(In millions)

 

Customer relationships

 

 

10

 

 

$

74.8

 

Trade name

 

 

4

 

 

 

14.9

 

Recipes

 

 

20

 

 

 

73.2

 

Standard operating procedures

 

 

20

 

 

 

8.6

 

Total purchased intangible assets

 

 

 

 

 

$

171.5

 

The results of operations for the Company for the year ended December 28, 2018 included revenues of approximately $81.0 million attributable to QGT’s operating activities since its acquisition date on August 27, 2018.

For the year ended December 27, 2019 and December 28, 2018, results of operations included charges of $15.3 million and $5.2 million, respectively, attributable to amortization of intangible assets and $2.6 million and $10.0 million, respectively, of costs associated with the acquisition, which were expensed as incurred and recorded as general and administrative operating expense.

Quantum Facility Fire

In September 2018, a fire in a facility owned by outlining all revenue generating activities, mapping those activitiesa South Korean subsidiary of QGT destroyed certain assets, including the building, acquired in the QGT acquisition. The fire damage was estimated to deliverablesbe $5.9 million. The building and tracing those deliverables torelated assets were fully insured, resulting in no net loss from the standard.fire damage. The fire also destroyed inventory owned by one of its customers. The cost of this inventory was assessed at approximately $6 million and is fully insured. The Company will usewas able to minimize the modified retrospective approach. The adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statementsrevenue stream by utilizing its other local facilities and moving its internal control over financial reporting, however it will require new disclosures,labor force in quick order. The Company had a $2.0 million business interruption insurance policy at the time of the fire, which the Company iscollected in the process of finalizing.2019 and recorded in other income (expense), net.

In July 2015, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that requires inventory to be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value instead of at lower of cost or market. This guidance does not apply to inventory that is measured using last-in, first out or the retail inventory method but applies to all other inventory including those measured using first-in, first-out or the average cost method. The authoritative guidance was effective forDynamic Manufacturing Solutions, LLC

On April 15, 2019, the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 and the Company recognized $0.1 million to value the inventory at lower of cost or net realizable value.

In February 2016, the FASB issued new guidance related to how an entity should recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. The guidance specifies that an entity who is a lessee under lease agreements should recognize lease assets and lease liabilities for those leases classified as operating leases under previous FASB guidance. The guidance is effective beginning in the first quarter of 2019. Early adoption is permitted.  In transition, lessees and lessors are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginningpurchased substantially all of the earliest period presented usingassets of DMS, a modified retrospective approach. The Company is evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company currently expects that its operating lease commitment will be subject to the new standardsemiconductor weldment and recognized as right-of-use asset and operating lease liability upon adoption of this standard, which will increase the total assets and total liabilities that it reports relative to such amounts prior to adoption.


In March 2016, the FASB issued new guidance which involves several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. Under the new standard, income tax benefits and deficiencies are to be recognized as income tax expense or benefitsolutions provider based in the income statement and the tax effects of exercised or vested awards should be treated as discrete items in the reporting period in which they occur. An entity should also recognize excess tax benefits regardless of whether the benefit reduces taxes payable in the current period. Excess tax benefits should be classified along with other income tax cash flows as an operating activity. In regards to forfeitures, the entity may make an entity-wide accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest or account for forfeitures when they occur. The Company adopted the amended accounting guidance in the first quarter of 2017 and recognized $1.7 million of previously excluded tax attributes related to stock option windfall deductions and also recognized a corresponding offset to valuation allowance. Forfeitures will continue to be estimated consistent with the Company's existing accounting policies.

In August 2016, the FASB issued an amendment to its accounting guidance related to the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments. The amendment was issued to reduce the diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. The amendment will be effective for the Company beginning in its first quarter of fiscal year 2018 with early adoption permitted. The amendment is required to be adopted retrospectively unless it is impracticable. The Company expects that the adoption will not have a material impact on its financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB clarified its guidance to simplify the measurement of goodwill by eliminating the Step 2 impairment test. The new guidance requires companies to perform goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. The amendment will be effective for the Company beginning in its first quarter of fiscal year 2020. The amendment is required to be adopted prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact of adopting this amendment to its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB clarified its guidance on the definition of a business in accounting for transactions when determining whether they represent acquisitions or disposals of assets or of a business. The amendment will be effective for the Company beginning in its first quarter of fiscal year 2018. The amendment is required to be adopted prospectively. The adoption of this standards update will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued an accounting standards update with new guidance to clarify when changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award must be accounted for as a modification. The new guidance requires the application of modification accounting if the value, vesting conditions or classification of the award changes. The amendment will be effective for the Company beginning in its first quarter of fiscal year 2018 with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this standards update will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2017, the FASB issued new guidance which improves the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements and simplifies the application of hedge accounting. This standard will be effective for the Company beginning in its first quarter of fiscal year 2019 with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact of adopting this amendment to its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

2. Financial Instruments

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company uses certain interest rate derivative contracts to hedge interest rate exposures on existing floating rate debt. The Company classifies its interest rate derivative contracts primarily within Level 2 of the fair-value hierarchy discussed in Note 1of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements as the valuation inputs are based on quoted prices and market observable data of similar instruments. The Company does not use derivatives for speculative or trading purposes.


Cash Flow Hedges

In September 2015, the Company entered into an interest rate swap with East West and City National banks with a notional amount of $20.0 million pursuant to which the Company pays the counterparty a fixed rate of 0.99% and receives interest at a variable rate equal to the LIBOR rate the Company is required to pay under its term loan, or 1.57%, as of December 29, 2017. This interest rate swap effectively locks in a fixed interest rate of 2.99% on $7.8 million of the $9.9 million term loan as of December 29, 2017, with a decreasing notional amount based on prorated quarterly principal payments over the remaining period of the term loan.

In 2017, Miconex entered into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge certain forecasted costs and expenses transactions denominated in currencies other than Miconex’s local currency. The notional principal of these contracts was approximately $14.2 million as of December 29, 2017. These contracts have maturities of 36 months or less. 

Gains or losses on the effective portion of a cash flow hedge are reflected as a component of AOCI and subsequently recorded to interest income (expense) and/or to cost of goods sold when the hedged transactions are realized. If the hedged transactions become probable of not occurring, the corresponding amounts in AOCI would be immediately reclassified to interest and other income, net. As of December 29, 2017, the effective portion of the Company’s cash flow hedge before tax effect was approximately $1.3 million, of which $0.7 million is expected to be reclassified from AOCI into earnings within the next 12 months.

The Company records all derivatives in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. The Company’s accounting treatment for these derivative instruments is based on its hedge designation. The following tables show the Company’s derivative instruments at gross fair value (in thousands) as of December 29, 2017 and December 25, 2015.

 

 

 

 

December 30, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value of

 

Fair Value of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives

 

Derivatives Not

 

 

 

 

 

Balance Sheet

 

Designated as

 

Designated as

 

Total

 

 

 

Location

 

Hedge Instruments

 

Hedge Instruments

 

Fair Value

 

Derivative assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Level 2:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap

 

Other current assets

 

$

30

 

$

 

$

 

30

 

Forward contracts

 

Prepaid expenses and other

 

$

714

 

$

 

$

 

714

 

Forward contracts

 

Other non-current assets

 

$

588

 

$

 

$

 

588

 

 

 

 

 

December 30, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value of

 

Fair Value of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives

 

Derivatives Not

 

 

 

 

 

Balance Sheet

 

Designated as

 

Designated as

 

Total

 

 

 

Location

 

Hedge Instruments

 

Hedge Instruments

 

Fair Value

 

Derivative assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Level 2:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap

 

Other non-current assets

 

$

15

 

$

 

$

 

15

 

Interest rate swap

 

Deferred rent and other

   liabilities

 

$

 

$

6

 

$

 

6

 


The effect of derivative instruments in cash flow hedging relationships on income and other comprehensive income (OCI) is summarized below (in thousands):

 

Gains (Losses) Recognized in OCI

on Derivatives Before Tax Effect (Effective Portion)

 

 

Twelve Months Ended

 

 

December 29, 2017

 

 

December 30, 2016

 

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap

$

 

4

 

 

$

 

(60

)

Forward contracts

$

 

(1,510

)

 

$

 

 

 

Gains (Losses) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion)

 

 

 

 

 

Twelve Months Ended

 

 

 

Income Statement Location

 

December 29, 2017

 

 

December 30, 2016

 

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap

 

Interest and other income (expense), net

 

$

 

18

 

 

$

 

88

 

Forward contracts

 

Cost of goods sold

 

$

 

(255

)

 

$

 

There were no gains (losses) recognized in income on derivatives that are excluded from the effectiveness testing and ineffective portion of the cash flow hedge for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2017 and December 30, 2016.

The effect of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on income for the fiscal years ended December 29, 2017 and December 25, 2015 is immaterial to the financial statements.

3. Balance Sheet Information

Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

 

December 29,

 

 

December 30,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Raw materials

 

$

 

183,457

 

 

$

 

68,473

 

Work in process

 

 

 

43,826

 

 

 

 

26,529

 

Finished goods

 

 

 

9,557

 

 

 

 

8,859

 

Total

 

$

 

236,840

 

 

$

 

103,861

 

Equipment and leasehold improvements, net, consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

 

December 20,

 

 

December 30,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Computer equipment and software

 

$

 

11,672

 

 

$

 

11,135

 

Furniture and fixtures

 

 

 

3,318

 

 

 

 

3,118

 

Machinery and equipment

 

 

 

19,781

 

 

 

 

17,016

 

Leasehold improvements

 

 

 

23,185

 

 

 

 

16,838

 

 

 

 

 

57,956

 

 

 

 

48,107

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

 

 

(38,879

)

 

 

 

(33,825

)

Construction in progress

 

 

 

13,515

 

 

 

 

4,576

 

Total

 

$

 

32,592

 

 

$

 

18,858

 


4. Acquisitions

Miconex

On July 31, 2015, the Company acquired 100.0% of the shareholding interest of Miconex, a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of the Czech Republic and a provider of advanced precision fabrication of plastics, primarily for the semiconductor industry. This acquisition is expected to expand the Company’s capabilities with existing customers.Austin, Texas. Pursuant to the purchase agreement, the Company paid $15.6 million in cash and issued 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. In addition, the former owners of MiconexDMS are entitled to up to $4.0$12.5 million of potential cash “earn-out” payments over a two-year period following closing, based on Miconex’s achievement of specified performance targets based on earnings before interestearn-out if the combined weldment business, after the acquisition, achieves certain gross profit and taxes pursuant to the provisions of the purchase agreement. In 2016, Miconex achieved the specified performancegross margin targets for the first year and was paid the maximum of $2.0 million of the $4.0 million potential cash earn-out.

twelve months ending June 26, 2020. The fair value of the earn-out payments at the acquisition date was $1.5 million and was determined providingusing a risk adjusted earnings projections usingprojection utilizing the Monte Carlo Simulation.Simulation model. These inputs are not observable in the market and thus represent a Level 3 measurement as discussed in Note 1 of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. DuringThe total purchase consideration of DMS for purposes of the fiscal year 2017,Company’s purchase price allocation was determined to be $31.4 million, which includes the Company reassessedcash payment of $29.9 million and the fair value of the potential earn-out payments decreasingof approximately $1.5 million.


The allocation of the purchase price is preliminary pending the completion of various analyses and the finalization of estimates primarily related to taxes, inventory and residual goodwill. During the measurement period, which can be no more than one year from the date of acquisition, we expect to continue to obtain information to assist us in determining the final fair value of the net assets acquired at the acquisition date during the measurement period. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded based on valuations derived from $0.3 millionestimated fair value assessments and assumptions used by the Company. Thus, the provisional measurements of fair value discussed above are subject to change. The Company expects to finalize the valuation as soon as practicable, but not later than one year from the acquisition date. While the Company believes that its estimates and assumptions underlying the valuations are reasonable, different estimates and assumptions could result in different valuations assigned to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and the resulting amount of December 30, 2016 to nil asgoodwill. The following table summarizes the preliminary fair values of December 29, 2017. Miconex failed to achieveassets acquired and liabilities assumed at the specified performance target fordate of acquisition:

Fair Market Values (In millions)

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

$

1.5

 

Inventories

 

 

8.9

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

 

5.4

 

Goodwill

 

 

12.3

 

Intangible assets

 

 

6.9

 

Other assets

 

 

0.3

 

Total assets acquired

 

 

35.3

 

Accounts payable

 

 

(3.8

)

Other liabilities

 

 

(0.1

)

Total liabilities assumed

 

 

(3.9

)

Purchase price allocated

 

$

31.4

 

The customer relationships intangible assets acquired from the second year. The decreaseacquisition of $0.3 million was recorded as other income in the Consolidated StatementsDMS has an estimated useful life of Operations.six years.

The results of operations for the Company for the fiscal periodyear ended December 25, 2015 include five27, 2019 included eight months of operating activityactivities for Miconex.DMS. Net sales of approximately $14.2$35.2 million and operating income of approximately $2.0$4.9 million attributable to MiconexDMS were included in the consolidated results of operations. For the fiscal year ended December 25, 2015,27, 2019, results of operations included charges of $0.5$8.0 million of contingent earn-out expense recorded in other income (expense), net, $0.8 million attributable to amortization of purchased intangible assets and $0.4$1.2 million of deal costs associated with the acquisition. Deal costs are included in general and administrative expenses in the Company’s

Pro Forma Consolidated Statements of Operations.Results

Marchi

On February 5, 2015, the Company acquired the assets of Marchi, a designer and manufacturer of specialty thermocouples, heaters and temperature controllers, for approximately $29.9 million in cash and 1,437,500 shares of newly issued common stock for a total purchase price of approximately $43.7 million. In addition, the Company incurred approximately $0.2 million of costs related to the acquisition. The Company completed this acquisition primarily in order to expand its capabilities with existing customers and to bring the Company closer to the customer in the design stage of new products and next generation equipment. The Company financed the cash portion of the acquisition by borrowing a total of $29.7 million under the Credit Agreement. See further discussion of the borrowing arrangements in Note 6 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

The results of operations for the Company for fiscal year ended December 25, 2015 include eleven full months of operating activity for Marchi. Net sales of approximately $12.9 million and operating income of approximately $4.8 million attributable to Marchi were included in the consolidated results of operations. For the fiscal year ended December 30, 2016, results of operations included charges of $2.4 million attributable to amortization of purchased intangible assets and $0.2 million of deal costs associated with the acquisition. Deal costs are included in general and administrative expenses in the Company’s consolidated results of operations.


The following unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations assume the MarchiQGT and MiconexDMS acquisitions were completed as of the beginning of the year of the reporting periods presented (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

Year Ended

December 25,

2015

Net sales

$

490,927

Net loss

$

(9,161

)

Basic loss  per share

$

(0.29

)

Diluted loss per share

$

(0.29

)

 

 

Unaudited Pro Forma Information

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

December 27,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

(In millions, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

1,075.4

 

 

$

1,305.5

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(8.0

)

 

$

47.5

 

Basic income  (loss) per share

 

$

(0.20

)

 

$

1.24

 

Diluted income (loss) per share

 

$

(0.20

)

 

$

1.22

 

 


The unaudited pro forma results above include adjustments related to the purchase price allocation and financing of the Marchi and Miconex acquisitions,acquisition, primarily to increase amortization for the identifiable intangible assets, to increase interest expense for the additional debt incurred to complete the acquisition of Marchi,and to reflect the related income tax effect of the pro forma adjustments and to adjust weighted shares issued as part of the acquisitions. The unaudited pro forma results for the year ended December 25, 2015 include acquisitions related costs of $0.6 million which are not expected to occur in future quarters.effect. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information has been prepared by management for illustrative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the condensed consolidated financial position or results of incomeoperations in future periods or the results that actually would have been realized had UCT, MarchiDMS and MiconexQGT been a combined company during the specified periods. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information does not reflect any operating efficiencies and/or cost savings that wethe Company may achieve with respect to the combined companies, or any liabilities that may result from integration activities.

3. BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION

Inventories consisted of the following:

 

 

December 27,

 

 

December 28,

 

(In millions)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Raw materials

 

$

 

99.9

 

 

$

 

121.3

 

Work in process

 

 

 

57.6

 

 

 

 

51.0

 

Finished goods

 

 

 

14.9

 

 

 

 

13.8

 

Total

 

$

 

172.4

 

 

$

 

186.1

 

At December 27, 2019 and December 28, 2018, inventory balances were $172.4 million and $186.1 million, respectively, net of reserves of $12.0 million and $8.9 million, respectively. The inventory write-downs are recorded as an inventory valuation allowance established on the basis of obsolete inventory or specific identified inventory in excess of estimated usage. For fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, inventory write-downs were $2.5 million, $3.3 million and $2.6 million, respectively.

Property, plant and equipment, net, consisted of the following:

 

 

December 27,

 

 

December 28,

 

(In millions)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Land

 

$

 

4.8

 

 

$

 

4.8

 

Buildings

 

 

 

36.9

 

 

 

 

32.2

 

Leasehold improvements

 

 

 

41.8

 

 

 

 

38.6

 

Machinery and equipment

 

 

 

58.1

 

 

 

 

58.3

 

Computer equipment and software

 

 

 

32.1

 

 

 

 

31.3

 

Furniture and fixtures

 

 

 

4.4

 

 

 

 

5.8

 

 

 

 

 

178.1

 

 

 

 

171.0

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

 

 

(56.7

)

 

 

 

(42.5

)

Construction in progress

 

 

 

23.9

 

 

 

 

15.0

 

Total

 

$

 

145.3

 

 

$

 

143.5

 

Restructuring

During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019, the Company made a strategic decision to close its machining operations in South San Francisco, CA. As a result, the Company recorded a restructuring charge of $12.6 million related to the sale of equipment, facility leases, severance and write down of inventory.


4. FAIR VALUE

The fair value hierarchy requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The following table summarizes, for assets or liabilities measured at fair value, the respective fair value and the classification by level of input within the fair value hierarchy:

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurement at

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reporting Date Using

 

Description

 

December 27,

2019

 

 

Quoted Prices in

Active Markets for

Identical Assets

(Level 1)

 

 

Significant

Other Observable

Inputs

(Level 2)

 

 

Significant

Unobservable

Inputs

(Level 3)

 

(In millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingent earn-out liability

 

$

9.5

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

9.5

 

Common stock purchase obligation

 

$

6.8

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

6.8

 

Pension obligation

 

$

4.4

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

4.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurement at

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reporting Date Using

 

Description

 

December 28,

2018

 

 

Quoted Prices in

Active Markets for

Identical Assets

(Level 1)

 

 

Significant

Other Observable

Inputs

(Level 2)

 

 

Significant

Unobservable

Inputs

(Level 3)

 

(In millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forward contracts

 

$

0.2

 

 

$

 

 

$

0.2

 

 

$

 

Other liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingent earn-out liability

 

$

3.9

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

3.9

 

Common stock purchase obligation

 

$

8.5

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

8.5

 

Pension obligation

 

$

3.5

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

3.5

 

There were no transfers from Level 1 or Level 2. Fair value adjustments were noncash, and therefore did not impact the Company’s liquidity or capital resources. Qualitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements are as follow:

(Dollars in millions, except rate/multiple)

 

December 27,

2019

 

 

Valuation

Techniques

 

Unobservable

Input

 

Rate/Multiple

 

Contingent earn-out liability

 

$

 

9.5

 

 

Monte carlo simulation

 

Revenue discount rate

 

 

9.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue volatility rate

 

 

28.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock purchase

   obligation

 

$

 

6.8

 

 

Discounted cash flow

 

Revenue Multiple

 

1.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EBITDA Multiple

 

 

8.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension obligation

 

$

 

4.4

 

 

Projected unit credit method

 

Discount rate

 

 

2.43

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rate on return

 

 

1.37

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salary increase rate

 

 

4.42

%

Following is a summary of the Level 3 activity:

(In millions)

 

Contingent

earn-out

liability

 

 

Common stock

purchase

obligation

 

 

Pension

obligation

 

As of December 28, 2018

 

$

3.9

 

 

$

8.5

 

 

$

3.5

 

Fair value adjustments (DMS)

 

 

9.5

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Fair value adjustments (QGT)

 

 

(3.9

)

 

 

(1.7

)

 

 

-

 

Benefits and other adjustments (SSB)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

0.9

 

As of December 27, 2019

 

$

9.5

 

 

$

6.8

 

 

$

4.4

 


5. Goodwill and Purchased Intangible AssetsGOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The Company’s methodology for allocating the purchase price relating to purchase acquisitionsan acquisition is determined through established and generally accepted valuation techniques. Goodwill is measured as the excess of the cost of the acquisition over the sum of the amounts assigned to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired less liabilities assumed.

Goodwill and purchased intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but are reviewed for impairment at least annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. To test goodwill for impairment, the Company first performs a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If the carryingCompany concludes it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value,carrying amount, the Company would thendoes not proceed to perform a quantitative impairment test. If the second step ofCompany concludes it is more likely than not that the impairment test in order to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. If the Company determines that theunit is less than its carrying value, a quantitative goodwill impairment test will be performed by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. A quantitative impairment analysis, if necessary, considers the income approach, which requires estimates of the present value of expected future cash flows to determine a reporting unit’s fair value. Significant estimates include revenue growth rates and operating margins used to calculate projected future cash flows, discount rates, and future economic and market conditions. A goodwill exceeds its impliedimpairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying value. Any loss recognized should not exceed the Company would record an impairment charge equaltotal amount of goodwill allocated to the difference. that reporting unit. The process of evaluating the potential impairment of goodwill and intangible assets requires significant judgment. The Company regularly monitors current business conditions and other factors including, but not limited to, adverse industry or economic trends and lower projections of profitability that may impact future operating results.

As partIn the fourth quarters of 2019 and 2018, the Company’sCompany conducted its annual testingimpairment tests of goodwill and concluded that there was no goodwill impairment in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company performed the two-step impairment test of the Company’s three reporting units for potential impairment. The Company utilized the discounted cash flow method of the income approachwith respect to estimate the fair values of each of theits reporting units. The estimates used in the impairment testing were consistent with the discrete forecasts that the Company uses to manage its business, and, additionally, considered the developments that occurred since the dates of the acquisitions. Under the discounted cash flow method, cash flows beyond the discrete forecasts were estimated using terminal growth rates ranging from 4.2%—8.5%, which are considered to be the long-term earnings growth rates specific to the reporting units. The estimated future cash flows were discounted to present value using discount rates between 14.0%—17.5% that were the value-weighted average of the reporting units’ estimated cost of equity and debt derived using both known and estimated market metrics. These discount rates were adjusted to reflect risk factors that considered both the timing and risks associated with the estimated cash flows for each of the respective reporting units. The tax rates used in the discounted cash flows reflected the international structure currently in place, which is consistent with the market participant perspective. The Company then allocated the fair values of the reporting units to the assets and liabilities of each of the reporting units. Based on the Company’s analyses, the Company concluded that the fair value of each of the reporting units was greater than their carrying amount, including goodwill, and, therefore, the second step of the goodwill impairment test was not required.  


Details of aggregate goodwill of the Company are as follows (in thousands):follows:

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Net Carrying

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

Impairment*

 

 

Amount

 

Year Ended December 29, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

$

 

119,291

 

 

$

 

(34,043

)

 

$

 

85,248

 

Year Ended December 30, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

$

 

119,291

 

 

$

 

(34,043

)

 

$

 

85,248

 

*

Represents goodwill recorded for UCT in 2002 and Sieger Engineering in 2006, which was fully impaired in prior years.

Details of goodwill and other intangible assets were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

December 29, 2017

 

 

December 30, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

Assets

 

Total

 

 

Goodwill

 

 

Assets

 

 

Total

 

Carrying amount

 

$

 

85,248

 

$

 

31,587

 

$

 

116,835

 

 

$

 

85,248

 

 

$

 

37,024

 

 

$

 

122,272

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

SPS

 

 

SSB

 

 

Total

 

Balance at December 29, 2017

 

$

85.2

 

 

$

 

 

$

85.2

 

Business combination

 

 

 

 

 

65.0

 

 

 

65.0

 

Balance at December 28, 2018

 

 

85.2

 

 

 

65.0

 

 

 

150.2

 

Business combination

 

 

12.4

 

 

 

8.5

 

 

 

20.9

 

Balance at December 27, 2019

 

$

97.6

 

 

$

73.5

 

 

$

171.1

 

 

Purchased Intangible Assets

Intangible assets are generally recorded in connection with a business acquisition. The Company evaluates the useful lives of its intangible assets each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances require revising the remaining period of amortization. In addition, the Company reviews indefinite lived intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate their carrying value may not be recoverable and tests definite lives intangible assets at least annually for impairment. Management considers such indicators as significant differences in product demand from the estimates, changes in the competitive and economic environment, technological advances, and changes in cost structure.


Details of purchased intangible assets were as follows (in thousands):follows:

 

 

As of December 29, 2017

 

 

As of December 30, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 27, 2019

 

 

As of December 28, 2018

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Useful Life

Useful Life

 

Carrying

Accumulated

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Carrying

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

Amortization

 

 

Value

 

 

Amount

 

 

Amortization

 

 

Value

 

 

(in years)

AIT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

(in years)

 

Amount

Amortization

 

 

Value

 

 

Amount

 

 

Amortization

 

 

Value

 

 

Customer relationships

 

$

 

19,000

 

 

$

 

(17,998

)

 

$

 

1,002

 

 

$

 

19,000

 

 

$

 

(17,058

)

 

$

 

1,942

 

 

7

6 - 10

 

$

119.4

 

 

$

(39.8

)

 

$

79.6

 

 

$

112.5

 

 

$

(29.0

)

 

$

83.5

 

 

Tradename

 

 

 

1,900

 

 

 

 

(1,900

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,900

 

 

 

 

(1,900

)

 

 

 

 

6

4 - 6*

 

 

27.0

 

 

 

(8.1

)

 

 

18.9

 

 

 

27.0

 

 

 

(4.4

)

 

$

22.6

 

 

Intellectual property/know-how

 

 

 

1,600

 

 

 

 

(1,257

)

 

 

 

343

 

 

 

 

1,600

 

 

 

 

(1,029

)

 

 

 

571

 

 

7

7 - 12

 

 

13.9

 

 

 

(8.4

)

 

 

5.5

 

 

 

13.9

 

 

 

(6.9

)

 

$

7.0

 

 

Marchi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer relationships

 

 

 

9,900

 

 

 

 

(2,887

)

 

 

 

7,013

 

 

 

 

9,900

 

 

 

 

(1,898

)

 

 

 

8,002

 

 

10

Tradename

 

 

 

1,170

 

 

 

 

(1,170

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,170

 

 

 

 

(443

)

 

 

 

727

 

 

6

Intellectual property/know-how

 

 

 

12,300

 

 

 

 

(4,023

)

 

 

 

8,277

 

 

 

 

12,300

 

 

 

 

(2,643

)

 

 

 

9,657

 

 

8-12

Miconex

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer relationships

 

 

 

8,800

 

 

 

 

(2,835

)

 

 

 

5,965

 

 

 

 

8,800

 

 

 

 

(1,662

)

 

 

 

7,138

 

 

7.5

UCT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tradename

 

 

 

8,987

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,987

 

 

 

 

8,987

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,987

 

 

 

 

Recipes

20

 

 

73.2

 

 

 

(4.9

)

 

 

68.3

 

 

 

73.2

 

 

 

(1.2

)

 

$

72.0

 

 

Standard operating procedures

20

 

 

8.6

 

 

 

(0.6

)

 

 

8.0

 

 

 

8.6

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

$

8.4

 

 

Total

 

$

 

63,657

 

 

$

 

(32,070

)

 

$

 

31,587

 

 

$

 

63,657

 

 

$

 

(26,633

)

 

$

 

37,024

 

 

 

 

 

$

242.1

 

 

$

(61.8

)

 

$

180.3

 

 

$

235.2

 

 

$

(41.7

)

 

$

193.5

 

 

*

The Company concluded that the asset life of UCT tradename of $9.0 million is indefinite and is therefore not amortized but is reviewed for impairment at least annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable.

 

The Company amortizes customer relationships intangible asset for AIT using an accelerated method over the estimated economic life of the assets, ranging from 6 to 10 years. The Company amortizes its intellectual property/know-how and customer relationships intangible assets for Marchi and Miconex on a straight-line basis with an estimated economic life of the assets ranging from 7 to 12 years. Amortization expense was approximately $20.1 million for the year ended December 27, 2019, $9.6 million for the year ended December 28, 2018, and $5.4 million for the year ended December 29, 2017, $5.8 million for the year ended December 30, 2016, and $6.2 million for the year ended December 25, 2015.


In the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company wrote off the remaining book value of the tradename intangible acquired from AIT of $0.5 million and in the fourth quarter of 2017 the Company wrote off the tradename acquired from Marchi of $0.5 million as the Company no longer believed that these tradenames have value. The Company also carries a UCT trade-name intangible asset of $9.0 million as a result of a previous acquisition. The Company concluded that the UCT trade-name intangible asset life is indefinite and is therefore not amortized. The Company also concluded that the UCT trade-name as of December 29, 2017 is not impaired as there were no new events or changes in circumstances that would indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable.

As of December 29, 2017, future estimated amortization expense is expected to be as follows:2017.

 

 

Amortization

 

 

Amortization

 

 

Expense

 

 

(in thousands)

 

2018

 

$

 

4,390

 

2019

 

 

 

4,040

 

(In millions)

 

Expense

 

2020

 

 

 

3,543

 

 

$

19.8

 

2021

 

 

 

3,542

 

 

 

19.6

 

2022

 

 

 

3,543

 

 

 

19.3

 

2023 and thereafter

 

 

 

3,542

 

2023

 

 

14.2

 

2024

 

 

14.0

 

Thereafter

 

 

84.4

 

Total

 

$

 

22,600

 

 

$

171.3

 

 

6. Borrowing ArrangementsBORROWING ARRANGEMENTS

TheIn August 2018, the Company hasentered into a credit facilities in the U.S.agreement with Barclays Bank that provided a Term Loan, a Revolving Credit Facility, and Czech Republic that expire on February 2, 2019 and March 31, 2020, respectively. The Companya Letter of Credit Facility (the “Credit Facility”). UCT and certain of its subsidiaries have agreed to secure all of their obligations under a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”)the Credit Facility by granting a first priority lien in substantially all of their respective personal property assets (subject to certain exceptions and limitations). In connection with this credit agreement, the Company borrowed $350.0 million under the Term Loan and used the proceeds, together with cash on hand, to finance the acquisition of QGT (see Note 2) and to refinance its previous credit facilities.

In August 2018, the Company paid $41.6 million of principal, accrued interest, and fees in settlement of the then-outstanding term loan, revolving credit facility, interest rate swap under the Credit Agreement, and recognized $0.1 million in expense upon extinguishment of debt as Interest and other income (expense), net.

The Term Loan has a maturity date of August 27, 2025, with monthly interest payments in arrears, quarterly principal payments of 0.625% of the original outstanding principal balance payable beginning in January 2019, with the remaining principal paid upon maturity. The Term Loan accrues interest at a rate equal to a base LIBOR rate determined by reference to the London interbank offered rate for dollars, plus 4.5% (subject to certain adjustments quarterly based upon the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio). At December 27, 2019, the Company had an outstanding amount under the Term Loan of $300.0 million, gross of unamortized debt issuance costs of $9.7 million. As of December 29, 2017, the27, 2019, interest ratesrate on the outstanding Term Loan andwas 6.2%. After December 31, 2021, LIBOR will officially be phased out. The Company will work with its bank to determine alternative risk-free rates.

The Revolving Credit facility were 3.57% (2.0% fixedFacility has an initial available commitment of $65.0 million and 1.57% variable based on LIBOR) and 3.75% fixed, respectively. In ordera maturity date of August 27, 2023. The Company pays a quarterly commitment fee in arrears equal to manage interest rate risk on the variable component0.25% of the Term Loanaverage daily available commitment outstanding. During the second quarter of 2019, the Company entered into an interest rate swap withborrowed $15.0 million under the Lenders in September 2015 with a total notional amount


Revolving Credit Facility to fund the acquisition of $20.0 million pursuant to which the Company pays the counterparty a fixed rate of 0.99%DMS, and receives interest at a variable rate equal to the LIBOR rate the Company is required to pay under its Term Loan, or 1.57%, as of December 29, 2017. This interest rate swap effectively locked in a fixed interest rate of 2.99% on $7.8 million of27, 2019, the $9.9 million term loan balanceCompany had no amount outstanding as of December 29, 2017, with a decreasing notional amount based on principal payments overunder the remaining period of the term loan.Revolving Credit Facility.

The New Credit Agreement requires the Company to maintain certain financial covenants including a consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio (as defined in the New Credit Agreement) as of the last day of any fiscal quarter of at least 1.25 to 1.00, starting with the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2015 and a consolidated leverage ratio (as defined in the New Credit Agreement) as of the last day of any fiscal quarter of no greater than 3.53.75 to 1.00 starting with the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2015. The Credit Agreement also includes other customary affirmative and negative covenants. In December 2015, the Credit Agreement was amended to add a covenant requiring the Company to maintain a minimum cash balance of $35.0 million at the end of each quarter.1.00. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants forduring the quarteryear ended December 29, 2017.27, 2019.

The Letter of Credit Facility has an initial available commitment of $50.0 million and a maturity date of August 27, 2023. The Company pays quarterly in arrears a fee equal to 2.5% (subject to certain adjustments as per the Term Loans) of the dollar equivalent of all outstanding letters of credit, and a fronting fee equal to 0.125% of the undrawn and unexpired amount of each letter of credit. As of December 27, 2019, the Company had $1.5 million of outstanding letters of credit and a remaining available commitments of $48.5 million on the Letter of Credit Facility and $65.0 million on the Revolving Credit Facility.

As of December 27, 2019, FDS had an outstanding amount under a revolving credit facility of 1.7 million euros (approximately $1.9 million) with an interest rate of 0.9%.

Cinos Korea has Credit Agreements with various banks that provide Revolving Credit Facilities for a total available commitment of 1.9 billion Korean Won (approximately $1.7 million) with annual renewals beginning in April 2020 through October 2020 and interest rates ranging from 1.4% - 5.4%.  During fiscal year ended December 27, 2019, borrowings under these Revolving Facilities were insignificant and no amounts were outstanding as of December 27, 2019.

As of December 27, 2019, the Company’s total bank debt was $292.2 million, net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $9.7 million. As of December 27, 2019, the Company had $65.0 million and 6.5 million euros (approximately $7.3 million) available to draw from its revolving credit facilities in the U.S. and Czech Republic, respectively.

The fair value of the Company’s long term debt was based on Level 2 inputs, and fair value was determined using quoted prices for similar liabilities in inactive markets. The fair value of the Company’s outstanding borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility was based on Level 2 inputs, and fair value was determined using inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, specifically, discounted cash flows of expected payments at current borrowing rates. The Company’s carrying value approximates fair value for the Company’s long term debt.

As of December 27, 2019, the Company’s future debt and revolving credit facility.principal payment obligations for the respective fiscal years were as follows:

 

 

Debt

 

(In millions)

 

(Principal only)

 

2020

 

$

10.7

 

2021

 

 

8.7

 

2022

 

 

8.8

 

2023

 

 

8.7

 

2024

 

 

8.8

 

Thereafter

 

 

256.2

 

Total

 

$

301.9

 


As of December 29, 2017, the Company has outstanding amounts under the Term Loan and Revolving Credit Facility of $9.9 million and $39.9 million, respectively, which are gross of unamortized debt issuance costs of $0.2 million, for a total debt balance with this credit facility of $49.6 million.

As of December 29, 2017, Miconex had outstanding amount under a revolving credit facility of 2.3 million euros (approximately $2.7 million) with an interest rate of 1.3% plus a variable rate based on the Euro Interbank Offered Rate.

As of December 29, 2017, the Company’s total bank debt was $52.3 million. As of December 29, 2017, the Company has $0.1 million and 6.0 million euros (approximately $7.2 million) available to borrow on our revolving credit facilities in the U.S. and Czech Republic, respectively.

7. Income Taxes

U.S. and foreign components of income before income taxes were (in thousands):

 

Year Ended

 

 

December 29,

 

 

December 30,

 

 

December 25,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

U.S. operations

$

 

8,869

 

 

$

 

(17,459

)

 

$

 

(10,910

)

Foreign operations

 

 

78,073

 

 

 

 

36,406

 

 

 

 

14,517

 

Total pretax income

$

 

86,942

 

 

$

 

18,947

 

 

$

 

3,607

 

INCOME TAXES

The provision for income taxes consisted of the following (in thousands):following:

 

Year Ended

 

Year Ended

 

December 29,

 

 

December 30,

 

 

December 25,

 

December 27,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

December 29,

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

(In millions)

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

$

 

3,662

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

(52

)

$

 

0.1

 

 

$

 

2.3

 

 

$

 

3.7

 

State

 

240

 

 

110

 

 

158

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

0.2

 

Foreign

 

 

11,719

 

 

 

 

5,321

 

 

 

 

3,777

 

 

 

12.3

 

 

 

 

12.2

 

 

 

 

11.7

 

Total current

 

 

15,621

 

 

 

 

5,431

 

 

 

 

3,883

 

 

 

12.5

 

 

 

 

15.2

 

 

 

 

15.6

 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 

(5,556

)

 

 

1,706

 

 

 

12,043

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

(5.5

)

State

 

 

176

 

 

 

202

 

 

 

714

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.2

 

Foreign

 

 

1,616

 

 

 

 

1,557

 

 

 

 

(2,301

)

 

 

(3.1

)

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

 

1.6

 

Total deferred

 

 

(3,764

)

 

 

 

3,465

 

 

 

 

10,456

 

 

 

(2.5

)

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

(3.7

)

Total provision

$

 

11,857

 

 

$

 

8,896

 

 

$

 

14,339

 

$

 

10.0

 

 

$

 

15.3

 

 

$

 

11.9

 

 


Significant components of net deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilitiesIncome before provision for federal and state income taxes were as follows (in thousands):was generated from the following geographic areas:

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

December 29,

 

 

December 30,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Net non-current deferred tax asset:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inventory valuation and basis difference

 

$

 

2,703

 

 

$

 

3,359

 

State taxes

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

49

 

Stock compensation

 

 

 

1,398

 

 

 

 

1,788

 

Other accrued expenses

 

 

 

1,148

 

 

 

 

1,748

 

Depreciation

 

 

 

302

 

 

 

 

1,347

 

Intangibles

 

 

 

3,387

 

 

 

 

5,105

 

Net operating losses

 

 

 

3,055

 

 

 

 

9,588

 

Research & other credits

 

 

 

 

 

 

980

 

 

 

 

 

12,043

 

 

 

 

23,964

 

Valuation allowance

 

 

 

(8,064

)

 

 

 

(23,844

)

Net non-current deferred tax asset

 

 

 

3,979

 

 

 

 

120

 

Total deferred tax asset

 

 

 

3,979

 

 

 

 

120

 

Current deferred tax liability:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Undistributed earnings

 

 

 

(2,516

)

 

 

 

(1,126

)

Non-current deferred tax liability:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

 

 

(6,493

)

 

 

 

(7,556

)

Net deferred tax asset (liability)

 

$

 

(5,030

)

 

$

 

(8,562

)

 

Year Ended

 

 

December 27,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

December 29,

 

(In millions)

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

United States

$

 

(49.7

)

 

$

 

(5.0

)

 

$

 

8.9

 

Foreign

 

 

52.0

 

 

 

 

57.3

 

 

 

 

78.1

 

Total pretax income

$

 

2.3

 

 

$

 

52.3

 

 

$

 

87.0

 

 

The effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory tax rate as follows:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

December 29,

 

 

 

December 30,

 

 

 

December 25,

 

 

 

December 27,

 

 

 

December 28,

 

 

 

December 29,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

2017

 

 

Federal income tax provision at statutory rate

 

 

35.0

 

%

 

 

34.0

 

%

 

 

34.0

 

%

 

 

21.0

 

%

 

 

21.0

 

%

 

 

35.0

 

%

State income taxes, net of federal benefit

 

 

0.3

 

%

 

 

(0.6

)

%

 

 

(3.1

)

%

 

 

(99.5

)

%

 

 

2.0

 

%

 

 

0.3

 

%

Effect of foreign operations

 

 

(18.7

)

%

 

 

(15.3

)

%

 

 

(102.5

)

%

 

 

(85.3

)

%

 

 

%

 

 

(18.7

)

%

Change in valuation allowance

 

 

(19.8

)

%

 

 

30.8

 

%

 

 

445.8

 

%

 

 

552.7

 

%

 

 

(0.1

)

%

 

 

(19.8

)

%

China withholding taxes

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

10.3

 

%

Acquisition related costs

 

 

%

 

 

1.0

 

%

 

 

8.3

 

%

Tax law changes

 

 

15.8

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

Foreign income inclusions

 

 

34.5

 

%

 

 

2.1

 

%

 

 

%

Adjustment for changes in tax law

 

 

%

 

 

3.6

 

%

 

 

15.8

 

%

Other

 

 

1.0

 

%

 

 

(3.0

)

%

 

 

4.7

 

%

 

 

(7.5

)

%

 

 

0.7

 

%

 

 

1.0

 

%

Effective Tax Rate

 

 

13.6

 

%

 

 

46.9

 

%

 

 

397.5

 

%

 

 

415.9

 

%

 

 

29.3

 

%

 

 

13.6

 

%


Significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

December 27,

 

 

December 28,

 

(In millions)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inventory valuation and basis difference

 

$

 

3.4

 

 

$

 

3.3

 

State taxes

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

 

0.4

 

Stock compensation

 

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

 

1.7

 

Operating lease liabilities

 

 

 

9.0

 

 

 

 

Interest expense limitation

 

 

 

5.8

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

Intangibles

 

 

 

7.8

 

 

 

 

6.3

 

Net operating losses

 

 

 

6.4

 

 

 

 

2.2

 

Tax credits

 

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

 

0.6

 

Other timing differences

 

 

 

4.5

 

 

 

 

3.3

 

 

 

 

 

41.3

 

 

 

 

17.9

 

Valuation allowance

 

 

 

(25.8

)

 

 

 

(7.7

)

Total deferred tax assets

 

 

 

15.5

 

 

 

 

10.2

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Undistributed earnings

 

 

 

(0.5

)

 

 

 

(2.5

)

Operating lease right-of-use assets

 

 

 

(7.2

)

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

 

(3.3

)

 

 

 

(6.4

)

Intangibles

 

 

 

(5.8

)

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

 

 

(8.4

)

 

 

 

(6.9

)

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

 

 

(25.2

)

 

 

 

(15.8

)

Net deferred tax liabilities

 

$

 

(9.7

)

 

$

 

(5.6

)

 

The Company earns a significant amount of its operating income outside the United States, which is deemed to be indefinitely reinvested in foreign jurisdictions, except as disclosed below. As a result, most of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents are held by foreign subsidiaries. During 2019, the Company remitted earnings from its Singapore and Chinese subsidiaries. The Company currently does not intend nor foresee a need to repatriate any other funds to the U.S. other than possibly from its Singapore subsidiary. The Company expects domestic cash and cash flows from operations to continue to be sufficient to fund its domestic operating activities and cash commitments for investing and financing activities, such as debt repayment and capital expenditures, for the foreseeable future. If the Company should require more capital in the U.S. than is generated by its domestic operations, for example to fund significant discretionary activities such as business acquisitions, the Company could raise capital in the United States through debt or equity issuances. These alternatives could result in higher effective tax rates, increased interest expense, or dilution of our earnings. The Company has borrowed funds domestically and continues to believe it has the ability to do so at reasonable interest rates. The Company does not provide for U.S. taxes on its undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries that it intends to invest indefinitely outside the U.S., unless such taxes are otherwise required under U.S. tax law. In 2017, the Company determined that a portion of the current year earnings of one of its China subsidiaries may be remitted in the future to one of its foreign subsidiaries outside of mainland China and,


accordingly, the Company provided for the related withholding taxes in its consolidated financial statements. A portion of those earnings from China were remitted to the U.S. in 2019. As of December 29, 2017,27, 2019, the Company had undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries that are indefinitely invested outside of the U.S. of approximately $176.7$217.0 million. If the Company were to distribute these earnings to the United States, these earnings could be subject to withholding taxes in the countries where the cash was earned.

The U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) was enacted on December 22, 2017 and introduces significant changes to U.S. income tax law. Effective in 2018, the TCJA reduces the U.S. statutory tax rate from 35% to 21% and creates new taxes on certain foreign-sourced earnings. In addition, in 2017 the Company was subject to a one-time transition tax on accumulated foreign subsidiary earnings not previously subject to U.S. income tax.

Due to the complexities involved in accounting for the enactment of TCJA, SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 allows us to provide a provisional estimate of the impacts of the TCJA in our earnings for the fourth quarter and year ending December 29, 2017. Accordingly, based on currently available information, the Company estimates that the enactment of the TCJA will result in a one-time reduction in net deferred income tax liabilities of approximately $7.3M, due primarily to the re-measurement of U.S. deferred tax liabilities at the lower 21% U.S. federal corporate income tax rate. As the Company collects and analyzes data, interprets the TCJA, and receives additional guidance issued by the U.S. Treasury Department, the IRS, and other standard-setting bodies, it may make adjustments to the provisional amounts. Those adjustments may impact the provision for income taxes and effective tax rate in the period in which the adjustments are made. The accounting for the tax effects of the TCJA will be completed in 2018.

Provisional amounts for the one-time transition tax have been recorded as of December 29, 2017 and are subject to change during 2018. The TCJA requires the Company to pay U.S. income taxes on accumulated foreign subsidiary earnings not previously subject to U.S. income tax at a rate of 15.5% to the extent of foreign cash and certain other net current assets and 8% on the remaining earnings. Based on cumulative foreign earnings of $176.7 million, the Company has recorded a provisional amount for the one-time transitional tax liability and income tax expense of $3.7 million. The provisional amount is based on estimates of the effects of the TCJA, as a full analysis requires significant data from our foreign subsidiaries that is not regularly collected or analyzed.

The following table summarizes the activity related to the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits (in thousands):

Balance as of December 25, 2015

$

337

Decreases related to prior year tax positions

(28

)

Increases related to current year tax positions

13

Expiration of the statute of limitations for the

   assessment of taxes

(24

)

Balance as of December 30, 2016

298

Increases related to current year tax positions

17

Expiration of the statute of limitations for the

   assessment of taxes

(13

)

Balance as of December 29, 2017

$

302

 

The Company’s gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits as of December 29, 201727, 2019 and December 30, 201628, 2018 was $0.3$1.0 million and $0.3$1.0 million, respectively. Increases or decreases to interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions are included in the income tax provision in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Interest related to uncertain tax positions for the periods ended December 27, 2019, December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017 December 30, 2016were $0.3 million, $0.1 million, and December 25, 2015 was considered to be de minimis.$0.0 million, respectively. Although it is possible some of the unrecognized tax benefits could be settled within the next twelve months, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the outcome at this time.


 

As of December 29, 2017,28, 2019, the Company had California net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) of approximately $24.3$32.9 million. The California NOLs begin expiring after 2031.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various states and foreign jurisdictions. The Company’s 20142016 through 20162018 federal income tax returns are open to audit through the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company’s 20132015 through 20162018 state income tax returns are open to audit by the


California Franchise Tax Board. The Company is also subject to examination in various other jurisdictions for various periods.

Effective January 1, 2018, the Tax Act Cuts and Jobs created a new requirement to include in U.S. income global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) earned by controlled foreign corporations (“CFC”). The effect of GILTI, and the associated foreign tax credit, is to effectively create a minimum floor of taxation on CFC profits that must be included currently in the gross income of the CFCs’ U.S. shareholder. Under GAAP, we are allowed to make an accounting policy choice of either (1) treating taxes due on future U.S. inclusions related to GILTI as a current-period expense when incurred (the “period cost method”) or (2) factoring such amounts into a company’s measurement of its deferred taxes (the “deferred method”). The Company uses the period cost method in recording the tax effects of GILTI in its financial statements.

8. Stockholders’ EquityRETIREMENT PLANS

Stock RepurchaseDefined Benefit Plan — On July 24, 2008,

Cinos Korea has a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all of its employees upon their retirement. The benefits are based on expected years of service and average compensation. The net period costs are recognized as employees render the Boardservices necessary to earn the postretirement benefits.  The Company records annual amounts relating to the pension plan based on calculations that incorporate various actuarial and other assumptions, including discount rates, mortality, assumed rates of Directors approvedreturn, compensation increases and turnover rates.  The Company reviews its assumptions on an annual basis and makes modifications to the assumptions based on current and expected rates return and trends when it is appropriate to do so.  The effect of modifications to those assumptions is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and amortized to net periodic cost over future periods using the corridor method.  The Company believes that the assumptions utilized in recording its obligations under the plan are reasonable based on its experience and market conditions.  

As of December 27, 2019, the benefit obligation of the plan is $7.8 million and the fair value of the benefit plan assets, which are invested in several fixed deposit accounts with a stock repurchase programbank is $3.9 million.  As of December 27, 2019, the unfunded balance of the plan of $4.4 million has been accrued for by the Company and is included in other long-term liabilities.  Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income as of December 27, 2019 is $1.7 million.  The contributions to the plan by the Company and its subsidiaries during the year ended December 27, 2019 was $0.6 million. The benefits expected to be paid from the pension plan in each year from 2020-2024 are $1.1 million, $1.1 million, $2.3 million, $0.9 million and $1.0 million, respectively.  The aggregate benefits expected to be paid in the five years from 2025-2029 are $4.7 million.


Employee Savings and Retirement Plan

The Company sponsors a 401(k) savings and retirement plan (the “401(k) Plan”) for all US employees who meet certain eligibility requirements. Participants could elect to contribute to the 401(k) Plan, on a pre-tax basis, up to $10.0 million.25.0% of their salary to a maximum of IRS limit. The Company commencedmay make matching contributions of up to 3.0% of employee contributions based upon eligibility. The Company made discretionary employer contributions of approximately $2.3 million, $1.2 million and $1.2 million to the repurchase401(k) Plan in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Commitment

The Company had commitments to purchase inventory totaling approximately $139.9 million at December 27, 2019.

Contingency

From time to time, the Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, that arise in the ordinary course of business. Although the outcome of the various legal proceedings and claims individually or in the aggregate cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company has not had a history of outcomes to date that have been material to the statement of operations and does not believe that any of these proceedings or other claims will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

10. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

Common Stock Offering

In February 2018, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 4,761,905 shares of its common stock with net proceeds of approximately $94.3 million, after deducting the underwriting discounts and offering expenses of $0.7 million.

Noncontrolling Interests

QGT owns 51.0% of the outstanding shares of Cinos Korea that provides outsourced cleaning and recycling of precision parts for the semiconductor industry through its operating facilities in South Korea and, through a 60.0% interest in a joint venture with Cinos China. QGT is obligated to purchase shares held by two other shareholders of Cinos Korea representing a combined 35.0% interest. QGT accounted for this unconditional obligation as an assumed liability and derecognized any noncontrolling interest related to the 35%, which brings its controlling interest up to 86%.  

The carrying value of the remaining 14.0% interest held by others in Cinos Korea and the 40.0% interest in the China joint venture are presented as noncontrolling interests in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The fair values of the noncontrolling interests were estimated based on August 4, 2008.the values of Cinos Korea and Cinos China on a 100.0% basis. The values were calculated based on the pro-rata portion of total number2019 QGT earnings before interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") contributed by each entity. Management indicated that each entity's pro-rata portion of EBITDA was reasonably reflective of each entity's invested capital value at the acquisition date.

The Company is obligated to purchase shares repurchased and related costowned by a Cinos Korea shareholder at a fixed price per share, while the purchase price per share for the other shareholder is the greater of the then fair value of the stock repurchase program were 601,994 shares at a cost of $3,337,000, or an average cost of $5.54and the fixed price per share.share (floor). The Company has not repurchased stock during anya firm obligation to purchase the shares and a call option, while the two shareholders have a put option. Accordingly, the fair value of the fiscalobligation of $6.8 million has been recorded as a non-current liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and represents a Level 3 measurement as discussed in Note 1 of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. The agreement with Cinos Korea allows for the purchase obligation to become due in December 2022, and once completed, the Company will own 86% of Cinos Korea.


11. EMPLOYEE STOCK PLANS

Employee Stock Plans

The Company maintains plans which allow for the issuance of equity-based awards to executives and certain employees. These equity-based awards include stock options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units. The Company also maintains an employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”) that provides for the issuance of shares to all eligible employees of the Company at a discounted price.

The estimated fair value of the Company’s equity-based awards, net of expected forfeitures, is amortized over the awards’ vesting period on a straight-line basis over a weighted average period of four years after 2008.for stock options, three years for restricted stock units and one year for restricted stock awards and will be adjusted for subsequent changes in estimated forfeitures and future option grants.

9. Employee Benefit PlansThe Company uses historical data to estimate pre-existing forfeitures, and records stock-based compensation for those awards that are expected to vest at the time of grant and revises those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

Stock OptionsOn February 20, 2003, the Company adopted the 2003 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2003 Incentive Plan”) which was subsequently amended and restated. The Company has reserved 4,515,239 shares of its common stock for issuance under the 2003 Incentive Plan. The stockholders of the Company approved an increase in the number of shares available for issuance under our amended and restated stock incentive plan by 2.3 million and 2.7 million in 2019 and 2017, respectively. At December 27, 2019, 1,299,197 shares were available for future grants under the 2003 Incentive Plan.

There were no employee stock option grants by the Company for years 2019, 2018 and 2017. During fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded $12.1 million, $10.3 million and $7.8 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense, associated with the 2003 Incentive Plan. As of December 27, 2019, there was $15.5 million, net of forfeitures of $2.4 million, of unrecognized compensation cost related to employee and director stock which is expected to be recognized on a straight-line basis over a weighted average period of approximately 1.8 years, and will be adjusted for subsequent changes in estimated forfeitures and future grants.

Total stock-based compensation during the fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, in various expense categories was as follows:

 

Year Ended

 

 

December 27,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

December 29,

 

(In millions)

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Cost of revenues (1)

$

2.4

 

 

$

2.1

 

 

$

1.5

 

Research and development

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.2

 

Sales and marketing

 

1.3

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

0.6

 

General and administrative

 

8.1

 

 

 

7.1

 

 

 

5.5

 

 

 

12.1

 

 

 

10.3

 

 

 

7.8

 

Income tax benefit

 

 

 

(3.0

)

 

 

(0.9

)

Net stock-based compensation expense

$

12.1

 

 

$

7.3

 

 

$

6.9

 

(1)

Stock-based compensation expenses capitalized in inventory for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 were considered immaterial.

2003 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan

Options

The 2003 Incentive Plan provides for the issuance of options and other stock-based awards. Options are generally granted at fair value at the date of grant as determined by the Board of Directors and have terms up to ten years and generally vest over four years.


The stockholders of the Company approved amendments to the Company’s 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, which included an increase in shares available for issuance by 1,500,000, 3,100,000 and 2,700,000 common shares which are more fully described in the Company’s definitive proxy statements filed on April 23, 2010, May 27, 2013 and May 21, 2017, respectively. At December 29, 2017, 2,199,977 shares were available for future grants under the 2003 Incentive Plan.

Option activity under the 2003 Incentive Plan is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

Average

 

Aggregate

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

Average

 

 

Aggregate

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

Remaining

 

Intrinsic

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

Remaining

 

 

Intrinsic

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercise

 

Contractual

 

Value

 

 

Shares

 

 

Exercise

 

 

Contractual

 

 

Value

 

 

Shares

 

 

Price

 

Life

 

(in thousands)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

Price

 

 

Life

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Outstanding, December 26, 2014

 

 

853,551

 

 

$

8.87

 

 

1.35

 

$

 

1,798

 

Exercised

 

 

(339,303

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cancelled

 

 

(198,600

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding, December 25, 2015

 

 

315,648

 

 

$

10.02

 

 

2.06

 

$

 

216

 

Exercised

 

 

(101,700

)

 

 

3.91

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cancelled

 

 

(77,489

)

 

 

 

12.54

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding, December 30, 2016

 

 

136,459

 

 

$

13.15

 

 

0.57

 

$

 

135

 

 

 

136.4

 

 

$

13.15

 

 

0.57

 

 

$

135.0

 

Exercised

 

 

(113,362

)

 

 

13.96

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(113.4

)

 

13.96

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cancelled

 

 

(13,825

)

 

 

 

14.56

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(13.8

)

 

 

14.56

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding, December 29, 2017

 

 

9,272

 

 

$

1.17

 

 

1.24

 

$

 

203

 

 

 

9.2

 

 

$

1.17

 

 

1.24

 

 

$

203.0

 

Options exercisable and expected to vest,

December 29, 2017

 

 

9,272

 

 

$

1.17

 

 

1.24

 

$

 

203

 

Exercised

 

 

(5.0

)

 

1.17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding, December 28, 2018

 

 

4.2

 

 

$

1.17

 

 

0.24

 

 

$

30.0

 

Exercised

 

 

(4.2

)

 

$

1.17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding, December 27, 2019

 

 

-

 

 

$

 

 

 

-

 

 

$

 

Options exercisable and expected to vest,

December 27, 2019

 

 

-

 

 

$

 

 

 

-

 

 

$

 

 

The following table summarizes information with respect to options outstanding and exercisable at December 30, 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Remaining

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Average

 

Exercise

 

Shares

 

 

Exercise

Range of Exercise Price

 

 

Outstanding

 

 

Life (Years)

 

Price

 

Exercisable

 

 

Price

$

1.17

 

 

 

9,272

 

 

1.24

 

$

1.17

 

 

9,272

 

 

$

1.17


For the fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015, the intrinsic value of the Company’s exercised stock options was $0.2 million, $0.1 million and $0.2 million respectively. There was no stock-based compensation expense for fiscal year 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 attributable to stock options as all outstanding options were fully vested at the beginning of the 2014 fiscal year.

Restricted Stock Units and Restricted Stock Awards

In fiscal years 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, the Company granted 45,000, 52,00069,783, 38,010 and 56,00045,000 shares, respectively, of common stock to its board members under the 2003 Incentive Plan. These Restricted Share Awards (RSAs) vest on the earlier of 1) the next Annual Shareholder Meeting, or 2) 365 days from date of grant. The total unamortized expense of the Company’s unvested RSAs as of December 29, 2017,27, 2019, is approximately $0.4 million. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, the Company began granting stock awards in the forms of Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) and Performance Stock Units (PSUs) to its employees as part of the Company’s long term equity compensation plan. These stock awards are granted to employees with a unit purchase price of zero dollars and typically vest over three years, subject to the employee’s continued service with the Company and, in the case of PSUs, subject to achieving certain performance goals. The expected cost of the grant is recognized over the service period, and is reduced for estimated forfeitures and, in the case of PSUs, is reduced based on estimated achievement of performance goals. During the year ended December 29, 2017,27, 2019, the Company approved and granted 580,432883,837 RSU’s to employees with a weighted average grant date fair value of $21.82$12.58 per share and 127,248144,183 PSUs with a weighted average grant date fair value of $19.87$12.03 per share. As of December 29, 2017, $12.027, 2019, $15.1 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to RSUs remains to be amortized and is expected to be recognized over an estimated period of 1.61.8 years. The unvested amount is subject to forfeiture, until fully vested. At December 29, 2017, 1,676,31227, 2019, 1,790,786 shares were subject to forfeiture.


The following table summarizes the Company’s restricted stock unit and restricted stock award activity through the year ended December 29, 201727, 2019:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aggregate

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aggregate

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intrinsic

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intrinsic

 

 

Number of

 

 

Value

 

 

Number of

 

 

Value

 

 

Shares

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

Shares

 

 

(in millions)

 

Unvested restricted stock units and restricted stock

awards at December 25, 2015

 

 

1,267,942

 

 

$

 

6,563

 

Unvested restricted stock units and restricted stock awards at

December 29, 2017

 

 

1.7

 

 

$

38.7

 

Granted

 

 

1,432,860

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

 

 

Vested

 

 

(675,591

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

 

(267,704

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

 

 

Unvested restricted stock units and restricted stock

awards at December 30, 2016

 

 

1,757,507

 

 

$

 

16,466

 

Unvested restricted stock units and restricted stock awards at

December 28, 2018

 

 

1.8

 

 

$

14.6

 

Granted

 

 

760,180

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

 

 

Vested

 

 

(759,378

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.9

)

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

 

(81,997

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

 

 

Unvested restricted stock units and restricted stock

awards at December 29, 2017

 

 

1,676,312

 

 

$

 

38,706

 

Unvested restricted stock units and restricted stock awards at

December 27, 2019

 

 

1.8

 

 

$

41.9

 

Vested and expected to vest restricted stock units

and restricted stock awards

 

 

1,457,129

 

 

$

 

33,645

 

 

 

1.6

 

 

$

37.3

 

 

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In 2004 the Company adopted an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) and is authorized to issue 555,343 shares of common stock under the ESPP. The ESPP permits employees to purchase common stock at a discount through payroll withholdings at certain specified dates (purchase period) within a defined offering period. The purchase price is 95% of the fair market value of the common stock at the end of the purchase period and is intended to qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. There were 10,70021,161 shares issued under the ESPP during the year ended December 29, 201727, 2019.

Employee Savings and Retirement Plan12. REVENUE RECOGNITION

Revenue is recognized when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to the Company’s customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The Company sponsors a 401(k) savingsassesses collectability based on the credit worthiness of the customer and retirement plan (the “401(k) Plan”) for all employees who meet certain eligibility requirements. Participants could elect to contribute to the 401(k) Plan, on a pre-tax basis, up to 25% of their salary to a maximum of $18,000.past transaction history. The Company may make matching contributionsperforms on-going credit evaluations of customers and generally does not require collateral from customers.

The Company sells its products and services primarily to customers in the semiconductor capital equipment industry. The Company’s revenues are highly concentrated, and we are therefore highly dependent upon a small number of customers. Typical payment terms with our customers range from thirty to sixty days.

The Company’s SPS segment provides warranty on its products for a period of up to 3%two years and provides for warranty costs at the time of employee contributionssale based on historical activity. Determination of the warranty reserve requires the Company to make estimates of product return rates and expected costs to repair or replace the products under warranty. If actual return rates and/or repair and replacement costs differ significantly from these estimates, adjustments to recognize additional cost of goods sold may be required in future periods. The warranty reserve is included in other current liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and are not considered significant.


The Company’s products are manufactured at our facilities in the U.S.A., China, Singapore and the Czech Republic. The Company provides services from operations in the U.S.A., Singapore, United Kingdom, Israel, Taiwan, South Korea, and China. Sales to customers are initiated through a purchase order and are governed by our standard terms and conditions, written agreements, or both. Revenue is recognized when performance obligations under the terms of an agreement with a customer are satisfied; generally, this occurs with the transfer of control of the products or when the Company provides the services. Transfer of control occurs at a specific point-in-time. Based on the enforceable rights included in our agreements or prevailing terms and conditions, products produced by the Company without an alternative use are not protected by an enforceable right of payment that includes a reasonable profit throughout the duration of the agreement. Consignment sales are recognized in revenue at the earlier of the period that the goods are consumed or after a period of time subsequent to receipt by the customer as specified by terms of the agreement, provided control of the promised goods or services has transferred.

Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration we expect to receive in exchange for transferring goods or providing services. Sales, value-add, and other taxes we collect concurrent with revenue-producing activities are excluded from revenue. Certain of our customers may receive cash-based incentives, such as rebates or credits, which are accounted for as variable consideration. We estimate these amounts based on the expected amount to be provided to customers and reduce revenues recognized. As of December 27, 2019, an accrual for unpaid customer rebates of $1.7 million is included in accrued expenses on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company's disaggregated revenues are by segments.

The Company’s principal markets include America, Asia and Europe. The Company’s foreign operations are conducted primarily through its subsidiaries in China, Singapore, Israel, Taiwan, South Korea, United Kingdom and the Czech Republic. Below sales by geographic area represent sales to unaffiliated customers and are based upon eligibility. the location to which the products were shipped or services performed. The following table sets forth revenue by geographic area (in millions):

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

December 27,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

December 29,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

United States

 

$

546.2

 

 

$

602.2

 

 

$

512.2

 

Singapore

 

 

302.1

 

 

 

315.3

 

 

 

287.9

 

Korea

 

 

68.2

 

 

 

45.6

 

 

 

30.1

 

Austria

 

 

47.7

 

 

 

58.1

 

 

 

34.5

 

Taiwan

 

 

44.4

 

 

 

22.6

 

 

 

17.8

 

China

 

 

35.3

 

 

 

42.1

 

 

 

36.9

 

Others

 

 

22.3

 

 

 

10.6

 

 

 

5.0

 

Total

 

$

1,066.2

 

 

$

1,096.5

 

 

$

924.4

 

13. LEASES

The Company madeleases offices, facilities and equipment in locations throughout the United States, Asia and Europe. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet.

Right-of-use assets represent right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. ROU assets and liabilities are based on the estimated present value of lease payments over the lease term and are recognized at the lease commencement date.


approximately $1.2 million, $1.1 million, and $1.0 million discretionary employer contributions toThe Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate, thus the 401(k) PlanCompany uses an estimated incremental borrowing rate in determining the years ended December 29, 2017, December 30, 2016 and December 25, 2015, respectively.present value of lease payments. The Company used an estimated incremental borrowing rate of 7.0%, which is derived from information available at the lease commencement date.

10. Net Income (Loss) Per Share

(Dollars in millions)

 

Twelve months ended

December 27, 2019

 

Operating lease cost

 

$

13.8

 

Short-term lease cost

 

 

1.1

 

Sublease income

 

 

(0.2

)

Total lease cost

 

$

14.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating cash flows from operating leases

 

$

17.3

 

Weighted-average remaining lease term – operating leases

 

 

2.4

 

Weighted-average discount rate – operating leases

 

 

7.0

%

(In millions)

 

Operating Leases

 

2020

 

$

15.1

 

2021

 

 

11.4

 

2022

 

 

9.3

 

2023

 

 

4.4

 

2024

 

 

2.7

 

Thereafter

 

 

6.3

 

Total minimum lease payments

 

 

49.2

 

Less: imputed interest

 

 

7.2

 

Lease liability

 

$

42.0

 

14. NET INCOME PER SHARE

The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in computing basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (in thousands):share:

 

Year Ended

 

 

Year Ended

 

December 29,

 

 

December 30,

 

 

December 25,

 

 

December 27,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

December 29,

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

(In millions, except share amounts)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

$

 

75,085

 

 

$

 

10,051

 

 

$

 

(10,732

)

Net income (loss) attributable to UCT

 

$

(9.4

)

 

$

36.6

 

 

$

75.1

 

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares used in computation — basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

 

33,409

 

 

 

 

32,632

 

 

 

 

31,564

 

 

 

39.5

 

 

 

38.4

 

 

 

33.4

 

Shares used in computation — diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

 

33,409

 

 

 

 

32,632

 

 

 

 

31,564

 

 

 

39.5

 

 

 

38.4

 

 

 

33.4

 

Dilutive effect of common shares outstanding

subject to repurchase

 

 

878

 

 

 

 

485

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

0.9

 

Dilutive effect of options outstanding

 

 

16

 

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

Shares used in computing diluted net income

(loss) per share

 

 

34,303

 

 

 

 

33,150

 

 

 

 

31,564

 

 

 

39.5

 

 

 

38.9

 

 

 

34.3

 

Net income (loss) per share — basic

$

 

2.25

 

 

$

 

0.31

 

 

$

 

(0.34

)

Net income (loss) per share — diluted

$

 

2.19

 

 

$

 

0.30

 

 

$

 

(0.34

)

Net income (loss) per share attributable to UCT — basic

 

$

(0.24

)

 

$

0.95

 

 

$

2.25

 

Net income (loss) per share attributable to UCT — diluted

 

$

(0.24

)

 

$

0.94

 

 

$

2.19

 


15. REPORTABLE SEGMENTS

Historically, the Company has operated under one operating segment. However, as a result of the acquisition of QGT, the Company created an additional segment in the first quarter of 2019. The Company reorganized its organizational and reporting structure to capture efficiencies and operating leverage from the Company’s recent acquisition and now operates and reports results for two operating segments: Semiconductor Products and Solutions (“SPS”) and Semiconductor Services Business (“SSB”). These segments are organized primarily by the nature of the products and service they provide. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer (chief operating decision maker) views and evaluates operations based on the results of each of the reportable segments. The following table describes each segment:

Segment

Product or Services

Markets Served

Geographic Areas

SPS

Assembly

Weldments

Machining

Fabrication

Semiconductor

United States

Asia

Europe

SSB

Cleaning

Analytics

Semiconductor

United States

Asia

Europe

 

The Company had securities outstanding which could potentially dilute basic earnings per shareuses segment profit or loss as the primary measure of profitability to evaluate operating performance and to allocate capital resources. Segment profit or loss is defined as a segment’s income or loss from continuing operations before other income and income taxes included in the future, butaccompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Any intercompany sales and associated profit (and any other intercompany items) are eliminated from segment results. There were no significant intercompany eliminations for the incremental shares from the assumed exercise of these securities were excluded in the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. Such outstanding securities consist of the following (in thousands):periods presented.

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

December 29,

 

December 30,

 

 

December 25,

 

 

 

 

2017

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Outstanding options

 

 

none

 

 

 

174

 

 

 

 

261

 

 

 

Fiscal Year End

 

 

 

December 27,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

December 29,

 

(In millions)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SPS

 

$

840.8

 

 

$

1,015.5

 

 

$

924.4

 

SSB

 

 

225.4

 

 

 

81.0

 

 

 

 

Total segment revenues

 

$

1,066.2

 

 

$

1,096.5

 

 

$

924.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SPS

 

$

121.8

 

 

$

150.3

 

 

$

167.7

 

SSB

 

$

75.0

 

 

$

25.5

 

 

$

 

Total segment gross profit

 

$

196.8

 

 

$

175.8

 

 

$

167.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating profit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SPS

 

$

18.3

 

 

$

52.3

 

 

$

89.5

 

SSB

 

 

11.6

 

 

 

8.4

 

 

 

 

Total segment operating profit

 

$

29.9

 

 

$

60.7

 

 

$

89.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 27,

 

 

December 28,

 

(In millions)

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SPS

 

 

 

 

 

$

828.0

 

 

$

803.7

 

SSB

 

 

 

 

 

 

191.3

 

 

 

161.8

 

Total segment assets

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,019.3

 

 

$

965.5

 

 


11. Geographical Information16. UNAUDITED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL RESULTS

The Company’s principal markets include North America, Asia and Europe. Sales by geographic area represent sales to unaffiliated customers and are based upon the location to which the products were shipped. The following table sets forth revenue by geographic area (in thousands):

 

Year Ended

 

 

December 29,

 

 

December 30,

 

 

December 25,

 

Sales

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

United States

$

 

512,153

 

 

$

 

308,129

 

 

$

 

313,090

 

China

 

 

36,893

 

 

 

 

13,152

 

 

 

 

21,464

 

Singapore

 

 

287,887

 

 

 

 

175,843

 

 

 

 

103,176

 

Austria

 

 

34,546

 

 

 

 

35,729

 

 

 

 

12,568

 

Others

 

 

52,872

 

 

 

 

29,906

 

 

 

 

18,805

 

Total

$

 

924,351

 

 

$

 

562,759

 

 

$

 

469,103

 

At December 29, 2017 and December 30, 2016, approximately $11.9 million and $8.1 million, respectively, of the Company’s long-lived assets were located in China, Singapore and the Czech Republic, and the remaining balances were located in the United States.


12. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company had commitments to purchase inventory totaling approximately $186.5 million at December 29, 2017.

The Company leases properties domestically in Hayward, California, Austin, Texas, Chandler, Arizona and South San Francisco, California and internationally in China, Singapore, Philippines and the Czech Republic. The Company leases certain of its facilities under non-cancelable leases, which expire on various dates through 2022. Total rent expense for fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015, was $6.9 million, $6.3 million and $6.8 million, respectively.

As of December 29, 2017, future minimum payments under these operating leases were as follows (in thousands):

Fiscal year

 

 

2018

$

 

7,162

 

2019

 

 

5,598

 

2020

 

 

4,925

 

2021

 

 

4,414

 

2022

 

 

3,648

 

Thereafter

 

 

116

 

Total minimum lease payments

$

 

25,863

 

From time to time, the Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, that arise in the ordinary course of business. Although the outcome of the various legal proceedings and claims individually or in the aggregate cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company has not had a history of outcomes to date that have been material to the statement of operations data for the periods indicated. The information for each of these periods is unaudited and has been prepared on the same basis as our audited consolidated financial statements included herein and includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments that we consider necessary for a fair presentation of our unaudited operations data for the periods presented. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in the future:

 

 

First

 

 

Second

 

 

Third

 

 

Fourth

 

 

Fiscal

 

(In million, except per share data)

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Year (1)

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

 

260.1

 

 

$

 

265.4

 

 

$

 

254.3

 

 

$

 

286.4

 

 

$

 

1,066.2

 

Gross profit

 

$

 

44.8

 

 

$

 

48.2

 

 

$

 

47.5

 

 

$

 

56.3

 

 

$

 

196.8

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

 

0.6

 

 

$

 

(0.2

)

 

$

 

0.5

 

 

$

 

(10.3

)

 

$

 

(9.4

)

Earnings (loss) per share — basic

 

$

 

0.02

 

 

$

 

(0.01

)

 

$

 

0.01

 

 

$

 

(0.17

)

 

$

 

(0.24

)

Earnings (loss) per share — diluted

 

$

 

0.02

 

 

$

 

(0.01

)

 

$

 

0.01

 

 

$

 

(0.17

)

 

$

 

(0.24

)

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

 

314.8

 

 

$

 

290.2

 

 

$

 

234.1

 

 

$

 

257.4

 

 

$

 

1,096.5

 

Gross profit

 

$

 

48.8

 

 

$

 

46.1

 

 

$

 

35.0

 

 

$

 

45.9

 

 

$

 

175.8

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

 

24.7

 

 

$

 

19.0

 

 

$

 

(6.00

)

 

$

 

(1.10

)

 

$

 

36.6

 

Earnings (loss) per share — basic

 

$

 

0.67

 

 

$

 

0.49

 

 

$

 

(0.15

)

 

$

 

(0.03

)

 

$

 

0.95

 

Earnings (loss) per share — diluted

 

$

 

0.66

 

 

$

 

0.48

 

 

$

 

(0.15

)

 

$

 

(0.03

)

 

$

 

0.94

 

(1)

Earnings per share is calculated independently each quarter and for the full year based upon their respective weighted average shares outstanding. Therefore, the sum of the quarterly earnings per share may not equal the annual earnings per share reported.

17.  SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent to December 27, 2019, the World Health Organization declared the novel coronavirus outbreak a public health emergency. The outbreak caused the Chinese government to place restrictions on travel and other activities throughout the country. The Company operates facilities in China. In cooperation with the government authorities, the Company’s operations in China extended their Chinese New Year holiday shut down for several weeks. While operations have resumed, the Company may operate at below normal levels due to the continued restrictions on travel in China and labor shortages. Although the Company does not believe that any of these proceedings or other claims will have a material adverse effectexpect the impact on its consolidatedoperations and financial condition, results to be significant in the first quarter of operations or cash flows.

In 2017,fiscal year 2020, the former shareholdersduration and intensity of Miconex disputedthe impact of the coronavirus and resulting disruption to the Company’s determination that Miconex failedoperations is uncertain.  The Company, therefore, cannot reasonably estimate the impact to achieveits financial statements beyond the specified performance target applicablefirst quarter of fiscal 2020. The Company will continue to monitor the potential cash “earn-out” payments undersituation closely and assess the acquisition agreementimpact on its operations and financial results for the second annual performance period ended July 2017 (the “Performance Target”). The Company expects the dispute to be resolved pursuant to the dispute resolution provisionsremainder of the acquisition agreement. The Company believes that Miconex did not achieve the Performance Target, and therefore no earn-out payment is owed by the Company. However, there can be no assurance that the dispute will be resolved in the Company’s favor. If the dispute is resolved adversely to the Company, the Company would expect to record a charge to Interest and Other Income (Expense), of not more than $1.0 million.

13. Subsequent Events

On February 2, 2018, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 4,761,905 shares of the Company’s common stock, in which the Company received net proceeds of approximately $94.5 million, after deducting the underwriting discounts and offering expenses payable by the Company. year.


Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Not Applicable

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer (“CEO”) and our chief financial officer (“CFO”), evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of December 29, 2017. Based upon the evaluation, our management, including our CEO and our CFO, concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

As required by Rule 13a-15(d) of the Exchange Act, our management, including our CEO and CFO, conducted an evaluation of our “internal control over financial reporting” as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) to determine whether any changes in our internal control over financial reporting occurring during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Based on that evaluation, there have been no such changes during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined under Rulein Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) promulgated under, including maintenance of (i) records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the Exchange Act. Becausetransactions and dispositions of itsour assets, and (ii) policies and procedures that provide reasonable assurance that (a) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, (b) our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and our board of directors and (c) we will prevent or timely detect unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of the inherent limitations of any system of internal control. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses of judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper overriding of controls. As a result of such limitations, there is risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting mayprocess. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.eliminate, this risk.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officerChief Executive Officer and principal financial officers,Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the frameworkcriteria established in Internal Control — IntegratedControl-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission (2013). The objectiveCommission.

Our assessment excludes Internal Control over Financial Reporting at Dynamic Manufacturing Solutions, LLC (DMS), which was acquired on April 15, 2019 and whose financial statements constitute 3.0% and 3.3% of the Company’s consolidated total assets (excluding $18.5 million of goodwill and intangible assets, net, which were integrated into the Company’s control environment), and revenues, respectively. We will include this acquired entity in our assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting in fiscal year 2020 annual management report, the annual management report following the first anniversary of the acquisition.

Based on our evaluation wasunder the COSO framework, our management concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 27, 2019, due to determine whetherthe fact that material weaknesses related to the Semiconductor Services Business (SSB) segment existed in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as further described below. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of December 29, 2017. Based on our evaluation under the framework set forthdeficiencies, inInternal Control — Integrated Framework (2013), our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting, was effective assuch that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of December 29, 2017.our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

TheOur independent registered public accounting firm, Moss Adams LLP, who audited the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has expressed an adverse opinion on the operating effectiveness of ourthe Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 29, 2017 has been audited by Moss Adams LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,27, 2019, as stated in their report which appears in this Form 10-K.

Material Weaknesses Identified Relating to Semiconductor Services Business (SSB) Segment

Based on our evaluation under the COSO framework, our management concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 27, 2019, due to the fact that material weaknesses exist in SSB.


In August 2018, we acquired Quantum Global Technologies, LLC, a privately held company (now SSB). During fiscal year 2019, management proceeded to implement control processes and procedures to integrate the acquired business into the overall Company. During fiscal 2019, process improvements were made; however, we have determined that the control environment of SSB lacks the maturity and design effectiveness necessary to comply with the requirements of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. As of December 27, 2019, management has concluded that due to deficiencies in the design and implementation of business process controls and information technology general controls relating to all relevant accounts and cycles within SSB, material weaknesses exist.

The Company’s Plan to Remediate the Material Weaknesses

The Company, with the oversight from the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, is committed to remediating the SSB material weaknesses in a timely manner. We have begun the process of executing remediation plans that address the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. We are engaged in various stages of remedial actions to address the material weaknesses described above. We are using both internal and external resources to assist in the following actions:

Assess key business cycles at material SSB locations to ensure that the processes, procedures and controls are adequately designed, clearly documented, standardized, appropriately communicated and executed timely to enhance control ownership throughout SSB.

Strengthen the information technology general controls that support SSB’s critical process areas.

Enhance SSB’s monitoring procedures by implementing new training activities and hiring additional qualified personnel.

Ensure appropriate resources and controls are fully incorporated into the corporate oversight function.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Rule 13a-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires that we conduct an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, and we have a disclosure policy in furtherance of the same. This evaluation is designed to ensure that all corporate disclosure is complete and accurate in all material respects. The evaluation is further designed to ensure that all information required to be disclosed in our SEC reports is accumulated and communicated to management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures and recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods and in the manner specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer supervise and participate in this evaluation, and they are assisted by our Chief Accounting Officer and other members of our Disclosure Committee.

We conducted the required evaluation, and our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined by Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) were not effective as of December 27, 2019 to accomplish their objectives at the reasonable assurance level because of the material weaknesses described above.

Notwithstanding such material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, our management concluded that our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K present fairly, in all material respects, the company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of the dates, and for the periods presented, in conformity with U.S. GAAP.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Other than the material weaknesses described above, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended December 27, 2019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Our remediation efforts related to the material weaknesses are ongoing.

Item 9B.

Other Information

None.


PART III

Pursuant to Paragraph G(3) of the General Instructions to Form 10-K, portions of the information required by Part III of Form 10-K are incorporated by reference from our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC in connection with our 20182019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Item 10.

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

The information required by this item concerning directors including our audit committee financial expert, is incorporated by reference to the section entitled, “Election of Directors” in our Proxy Statement for the 20182019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

For information with respect to Executive Officers, see Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, under “Executive Officers.”

The information required by this item with respect to Section 16(a) beneficial reporting compliance is incorporated by reference to the section entitled, “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our Proxy Statement for the 20182019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

We have adopted a code of ethics that is designed to qualify as a “code of ethics” within the meaning of Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules promulgated thereunder. This code of ethics is available on our website at www.uct.com. To the extent required by law, any amendments to, or waivers from, any provision of the code of ethics will be promptly disclosed to the public. To the extent permitted by such legal requirements, we intend to make such public disclosure by posting the relative material on our website in accordance with SEC rules.

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

The information required by this item regarding the security ownership of certain beneficial owners is incorporated by reference to the sections entitled “Executive Officer Compensation” and “Election of Directors” in our Proxy Statement for the 20182019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the sections entitled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in our Proxy Statement for the 20182019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The table below summarizes our equity plan information as of December 29, 2017:27, 2019:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(c) (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(c) (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of Securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of Securities

 

 

(a)

 

 

 

 

 

Remaining Available

 

 

(a)

 

 

 

 

Remaining Available

 

 

Number of Securities

 

 

(b)

 

 

for Future Issuance

 

 

Number of Securities

 

 

(b)

 

for Future Issuance

 

 

to be Issued Upon

 

 

Weighted-Average

 

 

Under  Equity

 

 

to be Issued Upon

 

 

Weighted-Average

 

Under  Equity

 

 

Exercise/Vest of

 

 

Exercise Price of

 

 

Compensation Plans

 

 

Exercise/Vest of

 

 

Exercise Price of

 

Compensation Plans

 

 

Outstanding Options,

 

 

Outstanding

 

 

(Excluding

 

 

Outstanding Options,

 

 

Outstanding

 

(Excluding

 

 

Awards

 

 

Options, Warrants

 

 

Securities Reflected

 

(Shares in millions)

 

Awards

 

 

Options, Warrants

 

Securities Reflected

 

Plan Category

 

Warrants and Rights

 

 

and Rights

 

 

in Column (a)

 

 

Warrants and Rights

 

 

and Rights

 

in Column (a)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:

 

 

 

1,685,584

 

 

$

1.17

 

 

 

 

2,199,977

 

 

 

 

1.6

 

 

$

 

 

 

2.2

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

1,685,584

 

 

$

 

1.17

 

 

 

 

2,199,977

 

 

 

 

1.6

 

 

$

 

 

 

2.2

 

 

(1)

Consists of the 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, and, for purposes of column (c), the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Since restricted stock units do not have an exercise price, they are excluded from the calculations in column (b) of the table above.


Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” in our Proxy Statement for the 20182019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the section entitled “Ratification of the Appointment of Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in our Proxy Statement for the 20182019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.


Part IV

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Form 10-K:

1. Financial Statements:

 

 

 

Form 10-K

Page No.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

4448

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

4650

Consolidated Statements of Operations

 

4751

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Loss)

 

4852

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

53

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

 

49

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

5054

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

5155

 

2. Financial statement schedules not listed have been omitted because they are not applicable or required, or the information required to be set forth therein is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto.

3. Exhibits


Exhibit Index

 

Exhibit

Number

 

Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Filing Date

 

Exhibit

 

Filed

Herewith

 

Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Filing Date

 

Exhibit

 

Filed

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.1

 

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 24, 2018, among Quantum Global Technologies, LLC, Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc., Falcon Merger Subsidiary, LLC and G-Squared Partners, LLC (as the representative of the unitholders of the Company)

 

8-K

 

000-50646

 

July 25, 2018

 

2.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.1

 

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.

 

S-1/A

 

333-11904

 

March 2, 2004

 

3.1

 

 

 

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.

 

S-1/A

 

333-11904

 

March 2, 2004

 

3.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.2

 

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.

 

10-Q

 

000-50646

 

May 2, 2016

 

3.1

 

 

 

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.

 

10-Q

 

000-50646

 

May 2, 2016

 

3.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.1

 

Specimen Stock Certificate

 

S-1/A

 

333-11904

 

March 8, 2004

 

4.1

 

 

 

Specimen Stock Certificate

 

S-1/A

 

333-11904

 

March 8, 2004

 

4.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.2

 

Form of Indenture between Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. and the trustee to be named therein

 

S-3ASR

 

333-222436

 

January 5, 2018

 

4.3

 

 

 

Description of Securities Registered Under Section 12 of the Exchange Act

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.1

 

Credit Agreement, dated as of February 2, 2015, among Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc., East West Bank, City National Bank and the several lenders from time to time party thereto

 

8-K

 

000-50646

 

February 6, 2015

 

10.1

 

 

10.1†

 

Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (as amended)

 

8-K

 

000-50646

 

May 24, 2019

 

10.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.2

 

First Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated April 3, 2015 among Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc., East West Bank, City National Bank and the several lenders from time to time party thereto

 

10-Q

 

000-50646

 

May 4, 2015

 

10.3

 

 

10.2†

 

Form of Stock Option Agreement

 

S-1/A

 

333-11904

 

March 8, 2004

 

10.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.3

 

Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated May 1, 2015, among Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc., East West Bank, City National Bank and the several lenders from time to time party thereto

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

10.3†

 

Form of Award Agreement

 

S-1/A

 

333-11904

 

March 8, 2004

 

10.13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.4

 

Third Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated December 24, 2015, among Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc., East West Bank, City National Bank and the several lenders from time to time party thereto

 

8-K

 

000-50646

 

December 29, 2015

 

10.1

 

 

10.4†

 

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement

 

10-K

 

000-50646

 

March 12, 2008

 

10.18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.5

 

Guarantee and Collateral Agreement in favor of East West Bank, dated as of February 2, 2015, made by Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc., Ultra Clean Technology Systems and Service, Inc., American Integration Technologies LLC, UCT Sieger Engineering LLC, Integrated Flow Systems LLC, Drake Acquisition Subsidiary, Inc. and the other Grantors referred to therein and from time to time party thereto

 

8-K

 

000-50646

 

February 6, 2015

 

10.2

 

 

10.5†

 

Employee Stock Purchase Plan (restated as of October 21, 2004)

 

10-Q

 

000-50646

 

November 8, 2004

 

10.9.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.6†

 

Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. 2003 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (as amended)

 

S-8

 

333-219447

 

July 25, 2017

 

99.1

 

 

 

Form of Indemnification Agreement between Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. and each of its directors and executive officers

 

S-1/A

 

333-11904

 

March 2, 2004

 

10.10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.7†

 

Form of Stock Option Agreement

 

S-1/A

 

333-11904

 

March 8, 2004

 

10.6

 

 

 

Severance Policy for Executive Officers (amended as of October 26, 2018)

 

8-K

 

000-50646

 

November 1, 2018

 

10.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.8†

 

Form of Award Agreement

 

S-1/A

 

333-11904

 

March 8, 2004

 

10.13

 

 

 

Offer Letter between Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. and James P. Scholhamer dated January 3, 2015

 

8-K

 

000-50646

 

January 5, 2015

 

99.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.9†

 

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement

 

10-K

 

000-50646

 

March 12, 2008

 

10.18

 

 

 

Change in Control Severance Agreement dated as of January 19, 2015 by and between Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. and James P. Scholhamer

 

10-K

 

000-50646

 

March 11, 2015

 

10.18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.10†

 

Promotion Letter between Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. and Sheri Savage (previously Sheri Brumm) dated February 18, 2016

 

10-K

 

000-50646

 

March 9, 2016

 

10.18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.11†

 

Offer Letter between Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. and Sheri Savage (previously Sheri Brumm) dated July 7, 2016

 

8-K

 

000-50646

 

July 12, 2016

 

99.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.12†

 

Change in Control Severance Agreement between Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. and Sheri Savage (previously Sheri Brumm) dated July 7, 2016

 

8-K

 

000-50646

 

July 12, 2016

 

99.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.13†

 

Amendment to Offer Letter and Change in Control Severance Agreement dated as of July 25, 2017 by and between Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. and James P. Scholhamer

 

10-Q

 

000-50646

 

August 9, 2017

 

10.2

 

 


Exhibit

Number

Description

Form

File No.

Filing Date

Exhibit

Filed

Herewith

10.10†

Employee Stock Purchase Plan (restated as of October 21, 2004)

10-Q

000-50646

November 8, 2004

10.9.1

10.11†

Form of Indemnification Agreement between Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. and each of its directors and executive officers

S-1/A

333-11904

March 2, 2004

10.10

10.12†

Severance Policy for Executive Officers (revised)

10-K

000-50646

March 19, 2009

10.16

10.13†

Letter Agreement between Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. and Lavi Lev dated November 18, 2011

10-Q

000-50646

May 3, 2013

10.1

10.14†

Offer Letter between Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. and James P. Scholhamer dated January 3, 2015

8-K

000-50646

January 5, 2015

99.1

10.15†

Change in Control Severance Agreement dated as of January 19, 2015 by and between Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. and James P. Scholhamer

10-K

000-50646

March 11, 2015

10.18

10.16†

Promotion Letter between Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. and Sheri Savage (previously Sheri Brumm) dated February 18, 2016

10-K

000-50646

March 9, 2016

10.18

10.17†

Offer Letter between Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. and Sheri Savage (previously Sheri Brumm dated July 7, 2016)

8-K

000-50646

July 12, 2016

99.1

10.18†

Change in Control Severance Agreement between Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. and Sheri Savage (previously Sheri Brumm dated July 7, 2016)

8-K

000-50646

July 12, 2016

99.2

10.19†

Amendment to Offer Letter and Change in Control Severance Agreement dated as of July 25, 2017 by and between Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. and James P. Scholhamer

10-Q

000-50646

August 9, 2017

10.2

12.1

Computation of Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

X

21.1

Subsidiaries of Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.

X

23.1

Consent of Moss Adams LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

X

24.1

Power of Attorney (included on signature page)

X

31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

X


Exhibit

Number

Description

Form

File No.

Filing Date

Exhibit

Filed

Herewith

31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

X

32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

X

32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

X

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document

X

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

X

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document

X

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document

X

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document

X

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

X

Exhibit

Number

 

Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Filing Date

 

Exhibit

 

Filed

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.14†

 

Form of Consulting Agreement

 

10-Q

 

000-50646

 

August 8, 2018

 

10.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.15

 

Credit Agreement, dated as of August 27, 2018, among Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc., Barclays Bank PLC, as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto

 

8-K

 

000-50646

 

August 31, 2018

 

10.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.16

 

Guarantee and Collateral Agreement in favor of Barclays Bank PLC and the other Lenders party thereto, dated as of August 27, 2018, made by Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. and the other Grantors referred to therein and from time to time party thereto

 

8-K

 

000-50646

 

August 31, 2018

 

10.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.17

 

Amendment Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2018, among Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc., any Subsidiary Borrowers, Barclays Bank PLC, as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto

 

8-K

 

000-50646

 

October 4, 2018

 

10.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.18†

 

Form of Change in Control Severance Agreement for Executive Officers

 

8-K

 

000-50646

 

November 1, 2018

 

10.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21.1    

 

Subsidiaries of Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23.1    

 

Consent of Moss Adams LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24.1    

 

Power of Attorney (included on signature page)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31.1    

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31.2    

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32.1    

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32.2    

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.INS

 

XBRL Instance Document

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.SCH

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.CAL

 

XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.DEF

 

XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.LAB

 

XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.PRE

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

Denotes management contract or compensatory plan.

 

Item 16.

Form 10-K Summary

 

None


SIGNATURESSIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.

 

 

By:

 

/S/    JAMES P. SCHOLHAMER

 

 

James P. Scholhamer

 

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

Date: March 14, 201811, 2020

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS , that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints James P. Scholhamer and Sheri Savage, and each of them, as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for him or her in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission hereby ratifying and confirming that each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature

 

Title

 

Date

 

 

 

 

 

/S/     CLARENCE L. GRANGER

Clarence L. Granger

  

Chairman

 

March 14, 201811, 2020

 

 

 

/S/     JAMES P. SCHOLHAMER

James P. Scholhamer

  

Chief Executive Officer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

March 14, 201811, 2020

 

 

 

/S/     SHERI SAVAGE

Sheri Savage

  

Chief Financial Officer Senior Vice

President of Finance and Secretary (Principal(Principal Financial Officer)

Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

March 14, 201811, 2020

/S/     CHRIS P. SIU

Chris P. Siu

Chief Accounting Officer

(Principal Accounting Officer )

March 11, 2020

 

 

 

/S/     LEONID MEZHVINSKY

Leonid Mezhvinsky

  

Director

 

March 14, 201811, 2020

 

 

 

/S/     EMILY M. LIGGETT

Emily M. Liggett

  

Director

 

March 14, 201811, 2020

 

 

 

/S/     THOMAS T. EDMAN

Thomas T. Edman

  

Director

 

March 14, 201811, 2020

 

 

 

/S/     BARBARA V. SCHERER

Barbara V. Scherer

  

Director

 

March 14, 201811, 2020

 

 

 

/S/     DAVID T. IBNALE

David T. IbnAle

  

Director

 

March 14, 201811, 2020

/S/     ERNEST E. MADDOCK

Ernest E. Maddock

Director

March 11, 2020

/S/     JACQUELINE A. SETO

Director

March 11, 2020

Jacqueline A. Seto

 

88

79