UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended Decemberended December 31, 2018 2021

or

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________ to _________

Commission file number: 001-12933number: 001-12933

AUTOLIV, INC.

(Exact name of registrantregistrant as specified in its charter)

DelawareDelaware

51-0378542

(State or other jurisdictionother jurisdiction of

incorporationincorporation or organization)organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

Klarabergsviadukten 70, Section B7,

Box 70381,

SE-107 24

Stockholm, Sweden

(Zip Code)

(Address of principal executive offices)

Klarabergsviadukten 70, Section B7, SE-111 64

Box 70381, SE-107 24

Stockholm, Sweden

(Address of principal executive offices)

+46 8587 20 600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registeredregistered pursuant to Section 12(b)12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class:class:

Trading Symbol(s):

Name of each exchangeeach exchange on which registered:registered:

Common Stock par(par value $1.00 per shareshare)

ALV

New York Stock ExchangeExchange

IndicateIndicate by check mark if the registrantregistrant is a well-known seasoned issuer,issuer, as defineddefined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.   Act. YesNo   No

IndicateIndicate by check mark ifif the registrant is not required to file reportsto file reports pursuant to SectionSection 13 or SectionSection 15(d) of the Act.the Act. Yes No  No

IndicateIndicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filedfiled all reportsreports required to be filed by SectionSection 13 or 15(d) of the Securitiesthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for suchsuch shorter period that the registrant was requiredrequired to file such reports)such reports); and (2) has been subjectsubject to suchsuch filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes:  Yes: No:    No:

IndicateIndicate by check mark whetherwhether the registrant has submitted electronicallysubmitted electronically every Interactive Data File required toData File required to be submitted pursuant to Ruleto Rule 405 of RegulationRegulation S-T (§ 232.405 of thisthis chapter) duringduring the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes:   Yes: No:    No:

IndicateIndicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, towhether the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   

Indicate by check mark whether the registrantregistrant is a large accelerated filer, an acceleratedaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reportingreporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller“smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in RuleRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

 

 

Accelerated filer

 

Non-accelerated filer

 

 

Smaller reporting company

 

Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

IndicateIndicate by check mark whetherwhether the registrantregistrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262 (b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell companycompany (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes: No:   No:

The aggregateaggregate market value of the voting and non-votingand non-voting common equityequity of Autoliv,Autoliv, Inc. heldheld by non-affiliatesnon-affiliates as of the last businesslast business day of the second fiscal quarterquarter of 20182021 amounted to $8,989 million.to $8,551 million.

Number of shares of Common Stock outstandingoutstanding as of February 13, 2019: 87,149,242.10, 2022: 87,488,549.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATEDAuditor Firm Id: 1433 Auditor Name: Ernst & Young AB Auditor Location: Stockholm, Sweden

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

PortionsPortions of the registrant’s definitivedefinitive Proxy StatementStatement for thethe annual stockholders’stockholders’ meeting to be heldheld on May 7, 2019,10, 2022, to be dateddated on or around March 27, 201925, 2022 (the “2019“2022 Proxy Statement”), are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10- K. The 2019 Proxy10-K. The 2022 Proxy Statement will be filed withwith the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days afterExchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2018.2021.


AUTOLIV, INC.

Index

PARTI

Item 1.

Business

3

Item 1A.

RiskFactors

911

Item 1B.

UnresolvedStaffComments

2224

Item 2.

Properties

2225

Item 3.

LegalProceedings

2528

Item 4.

MineSafetyDisclosures Disclosures

2528

PARTII

Item 5.

MarketforRegistrant’sCommonEquity,RelatedStockholderMattersandIssuerPurchasesofEquity Equity Securities

2629

Item 6.

SelectedFinancialDataReserved

28

Item 7.

Management’sDiscussion Discussion andAnalysisofFinancialCondition Condition andResultsofOperations

2931

Item 7A.

QuantitativeQuantitative andQualitativeDisclosures Qualitative Disclosures aboutMarketRisk Risk

5049

Item 8.

FinancialStatements Statements andSupplementary Supplementary Data

5251

Item 9.

ChangesChanges inandDisagreements Disagreements withAccountants Accountants onAccounting Accounting andFinancial Financial Disclosure

9691

Item 9A.

ControlsandProcedures

9691

Item 9B.

OtherOther Information

9691

PART IIIIII

Item 10.

Directors,ExecutiveOfficers Officers andCorporateGovernance

9792

Item 11.

ExecutiveCompensation

9792

Item 12.

SecuritySecurity OwnershipofCertainBeneficial Certain Beneficial OwnersandManagement Management andRelatedStockholderMatters

9792

Item 13.

CertainRelationshipsandRelatedTransactions, Transactions, andDirectorIndependence

9792

Item 14.

PrincipalAccounting Accounting FeesandServices

9792

PART IV

Item 15.

ExhibitsExhibits andFinancialStatement Financial Statement Schedules

9893


1


NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains statements that are not historical facts but rather forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements include those that address activities, events or developments that Autoliv, Inc. (“Autoliv,” the “Company” or “we”) or its management believes or anticipates may occur in the future. All forward-looking statements are based upon our current expectations, various assumptions and/or data available from third parties. Our expectations and assumptions are expressed in good faith and we believe there is a reasonable basis for them. However, there can be no assurance that such forward-looking statements will materialize or prove to be correct as forward-looking statements are inherently subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual future results, performance or achievements to differ materially from the future results, performance or achievements expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements.

In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “estimates,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “projects,” “plans,” “intends,” “believes,” “may,” “likely,” “might,” “would,” “should,” “could,” or the negative of these terms and other comparable terminology, although not all forward-looking statements contain such words.

Because these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, the outcome could differ materially from those set out in the forward-looking statements for a variety of reasons, including without limitation: general economic conditions, including inflation; the impacts of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on the Company’s financial condition, business operations, operating costs, liquidity, competition and the global economy; changes in light vehicle production; fluctuation in vehicle production schedules for which the Company is a supplier; global supply chain disruptions including port, transportation and distribution delays or interruptions; supply chain disruptions and component shortages specific to the automotive industry or the Company; changes in general industry and market conditions or regional growth or decline; changes in and the successful execution of our capacity alignment: restructuring and cost reduction and efficiency initiatives and the market reaction thereto; loss of business from increased competition; higher raw material, fuel and energy costs; changes in consumer and customer preferences for end products; customer losses; changes in regulatory conditions; customer bankruptcies; consolidations or restructuring; or divestiture of customer brands; unfavorable fluctuations in currencies or interest rates among the various jurisdictions in which we operate; component shortages; market acceptance of our new products; costs or difficulties related to the integration of any new or acquired businesses and technologies; continued uncertainty in pricing negotiations with customers; successful integration of acquisitions and operations of joint ventures; successful implementation of strategic partnerships and collaborations; our ability to be awarded new business; product liability, warranty and recall claims and investigations and other litigation, civil judgements or financial penalties and customer reactions thereto (including the resolution of the Toyota Recall);thereto; higher expenses for our pension and other postretirement benefits, including higher funding needs for our pension plans; work stoppages or other labor issues; possible adverse results of pending or future litigation or infringement claims;claims, and the availability of insurance with respect to such matters; our ability to protect our intellectual property rights; negative impacts of antitrust investigations or other governmental investigations and associated litigation relating to the conduct of our business; tax assessments by governmental authorities and changes in our effective tax rate; dependence on key personnel; legislative or regulatory changes impacting or limiting our business; our ability to meet our sustainability targets, goals and commitments; political conditions; dependence on and relationships with customers and suppliers; and other risks and uncertainties identified in Item 1A -“Risk Factors” and Item 7 - “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Form 10-K.Annual Report.

For any forward-looking statements contained in this or any other document, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward- looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and we assume no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements in light of new information or future events, except as required by law.


2


PARTPART I

Item 1. Business

General

Autoliv, Inc. (“Autoliv”, the “Company” or “we”) is a Delaware corporation with its principal executive offices in Stockholm, Sweden. Autoliv was created in 1997 from the merger of Autoliv AB and the automotive safety products business of Morton International, Inc. The Company functions as a holding corporation and owns two principal subsidiaries, Autoliv AB and Autoliv ASP, Inc. OurThe Company's fiscal year ends on December 31.

On June 29, 2018, Autoliv completed the spin-off of its former Electronics segment (the “spin-off”) through the distribution of all of the issued and outstanding stock of Veoneer, Inc. The spin-off is described in more detail in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report.

Business

AutolivCompany is a leading developer, manufacturer and supplier of automotivepassive safety systems to the automotive industry with a broad range of product offerings, primarily passive safety systems.offerings.

Passive safety systems are primarily meant to improve vehicle safety.safety for occupants in a vehicle. Passive safety systems include modules and components for frontal-impact airbag protection systems, side-impact airbag protection systems, seatbelts, steering wheels, inflator technologies and battery cable cutters,cut-off switches.

To extend into new markets areas beyond light vehicles and occupant safety, the Company has formed Mobility Safety Solutions. By combining its core competence and industry experience, the Company also develops and manufactures mobility safety solutions such as pedestrian protection, systemsbattery cut-off switches, connected safety services and child seats.safety solutions for riders of powered two wheelers.

Including joint venture operations, AutolivThe Company has approximately 6462 production facilities in 25 countries and its customers include the world’s largest car manufacturers. Autoliv’sThe Company’s sales in 20182021 were 8.7$8.2 billion, approximately 66%65% of which consisted of airbag and steering wheel products and approximately 34%35% of which consisted of seatbelt products. OurThe Company's business is conducted in the following geographical regions,regions: Europe, the Americas, China, Japan and the Rest of Asia (ROA).

Autoliv’sThe Company’s head office is located in Stockholm, Sweden, where weit currently employemploys approximately 7095 people. At December 31, 2018, Autoliv2021, the Company had approximately 58,000 employees worldwide, and a total headcount, including 9,000 temporarynumber of personnel of approximately 67,000.60,600 worldwide, whereof 8 % were temporary personnel.

Additional information required by this Item 1 regarding developments in the Company’s business during 20182021 is contained under Item 7 in this Annual Report.

Financial Information on SegmentsReportable Segment

Upon completion of the spin-off, Autoliv concluded at June 30, 2018 that itThe Company has one reportable segment based on the way the Company evaluates its financial performance and manages its operations. Prior to the completionThe Company's business is comprised of the Spin-off, the Company had two reportable segments, Electronicspassive safety products - principally airbags (including steering wheels and Passive Safety. The Company’s single operating segment includesinflators) and seatbelts. For more information regarding the Company’s airbag (including steering wheels), seatbelt products and components. For financialsegment reporting, purposes, the single operating segment is also the Company’s single reportable segment in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 280 Segment Reporting. The financial data relating to Autoliv’s businesses in this segment over the last three fiscal years is contained in the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Annual Report. A statement of net sales by product group and region for the last three years is contained insee Note 221 to the Consolidated Financial Statements ofin this Annual Report.

Products, Market and Competition

Products

Saving more lives on the road Providing life-saving solutions is a key health priority as ourthe world population grows and develops. However, population expansion in growth markets and the rise of megacities creates new complexities. To meet this challenge, we develop automotivethe Company develops safety solutionsfor both mobility and society that work in real life situations.

OurThe Company's safety systems such as seatbelts and airbags substantially mitigate human consequences of traffic accidents.

The airbag module is designed to inflate extremely rapidly then quickly deflate during a collision or impact. It consists of the container, an airbag cushion and an inflator. The purpose of the airbag is to provide the occupants a cushioning and restraint during a crash event to prevent any impact or impact-caused injuries between the occupant and the interior of the vehicle.

Seatbelts can reduce the overall risk of serious injuries in frontal crashes by as much as 60% thanksdue to advanced seatbelt technologies such as pretensioners and load limiters.

AutolivThe Company also manufactures steering wheels whichthat are crafted to ensure they meet safety requirements and are functional as well as stylish.


Market and Competition

Consumer research clearly shows that peopleconsumers want safe cars,vehicles, and several significant trends are likely to have a positive influence on overall safety content per vehicle. These include:

1) Society becoming increasingly focused on Vision Zero, which includes a goal of reducing traffic fatalities and their associated costs,costs;

2) Demographic trends of increased urbanization, aging driver populations and increased safety focus in the Growth Markets, andgrowth markets;

3) Evolving government regulations and test rating systems to improve the safety of vehicles in various markets, such as the updated Euro NCAP,New Car Assessment Program (NCAP), China NCAP and USNCAP.USNCAP; and

4) The trend towards autonomous driving vehicles will require new and more complex solutions as to provide protection of occupants in new seating positions, regardless of how a driver or other passenger are seated.

3


The automotive safety market is driven by two primary factors: light vehicle production (LVP) and content per vehicle (CPV).

The first growth driver, LVP, has increased at an average annual growth rate of around 2.6%1.3% since the incorporationstart of Autoliv Inc. in 1997 despite the cyclical nature ofsubstantial drop in LVP in 2020 and 2021 due to the automotive industry.COVID-19 pandemic, supply chain disruptions and semiconductor shortages. LVP is expectedforecasted to grow to close to 9792 million by 2024 from approximately 73 million in 2021, as the market is expected to recover from approximately 91 million in 2018,the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and component shortages, according to IHS. Almost all of this expansion will be in the Growth Markets, predominantly in China, India, Southeast Asia and South America.IHS Markit.

Unlike LVP, where Autoliv can only aim to be on the best-selling platforms, Autoliv can influence CPV more directly by continuously developing and introducing new technologies with higher value-added features. Over the long term, this increases average safety CPV and has caused ourthe Company's markets to grow faster than the LVP.

Since the start of Autoliv, Inc. in 1997, the Company’s sales compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for passive safety has been 5.6%around 5% compared to the market rate of around 3%2% which includes an LVP growth of around 2.6%1%. OurThe Company's outperformance is a result of a steady flow of new passive safety technologies, strong focus on quality and a superior global footprint both in products and engineering. This has enabled Autoliv to increase its global market share in passive safety from 27% in 1997 to around 40%43% in 2018.2021.

In the Developed Markets (Western Europe, North America, Japan and South Korea) the CPV is around $280.$310. CPV growth in these regions will mainly come from new safety systems such as active seatbelts, knee airbags and front-center airbags along with improved protection for pedestrians and rear-seat occupants like bag-in-belt.bag-in-belt or more advanced seatbelts.

In ourthe Growth Markets we see(all markets other than the Developed Markets), the Company sees great opportunities for CPV growth from more airbags and advanced seatbelt products. Average CPV in ourthe Growth Markets is around $170,$200, approximately $110 less than in the Developed Markets.

DespiteAs a result of higher installation rates of airbags, more advanced seatbelt products and more complex steering wheels, CPV is expected to increase at a similar pace in both Developed and Growth Markets over the next three years. LVP in the Developed Markets is expected to increase faster than in the Growth Markets during the same period. This is because the Developed Markets are expected to recover from the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and semiconductor shortages experienced in 2021. Supported by a positive LVP mix effect from higher growth in lowhigher CPV markets, the annual passive safety market (seatbelts and airbags, including steering wheels), is expected to grow at a CAGR of 4% untilfrom around $18 billion in 2021 to about $23more than $25 billion over the next three years, based on the current macro-economic outlook and ourthe Company's internal market intelligence and estimates. The highest growth rate is expected in steering wheels, where Autoliv has a global market share of more than 30%around 36%, generated by the trend toward higher-value steering wheels with leather and additional features.

The Growth Markets are expected to outgrow the Developed Markets substantially for the period between 2018 and 2021, as the Growth Markets are supported by a higher LVP and increasing CPV resulting from higher penetration of airbags and more advanced seatbelt products.

In seatbelts, Autoliv has reached a global market share of around 40%44%, primarily due to being the technology leader with several important innovations such as pretensioners and active seatbelts. OurThe Company's strong market position is also a reflection of ourits superior global footprint. Seatbelts are the primary life-saving safety product and are also an important requirement in low-end vehicles forin the Growth Markets. This provides usthe Company with an excellent opportunity to benefit from the expected growth in this segment of the market.

The market for airbags, where Autoliv has a global market share of around 40%43%, is expected to grow slightly slower thanmainly as result of higher installation rates of inflatable curtains, side airbags and knee airbags. Additionally, the total passive safety market. Thisnew front center airbag is relatedexpected to start to contribute to the dilutive effect frommarket growth.

The Company's ability to consistently outperform market growth is rooted in a steady flow of new low-end vehicles in the Growth Markets, with relatively low installation rates for airbags.safety technologies, a strong focus on quality and a superior production and engineering footprint.

The Company's competitors

Our competitors

Autoliv is the clear market leader in passive safety components and systems for the automotive industry with an estimated global market share of around 40%43%. Our major competitors have traditionally been Takata and ZF.

During 2017, Takata, a family-controlled Japanese company whose shares were listed onZF, the Tokyo Stock Exchange, filed for bankruptcy protection in the U.S. and Japan. The bankruptcy came after an accumulation of recall costs and liabilities related to malfunctioning airbag inflators. U.S.-based Key Safety Systems (KSS), owned by Chinese company Joyson, subsequently acquired Takata’s assets in April 2018 for approximately $1.6 billion. The new company is named Joyson Safety Systems (JSS). JSS is estimated to hold a global market share of 24%, including Joyson’s Chinese subsidiary YFK.

ZFCompany's largest competitor, is a global leader in driveline and chassis technology as well as in passive safety technologies, and is one of the largest global automotive supplierssuppliers.

The Company's second largest competitor is U.S.-based Joyson Safety Systems (JSS). JSS is a Chinese owned company and has an estimated global market shareis the result of 17%.


the merger between Key Safety Systems (KSS) and Takata Corporation after KSS acquired Takata in 2018.

In Japan, Brazil, South Korea and China, there are a number of local suppliers that have close ties with the domestic vehicle manufacturers. For example, Toyota uses “keiretsu” (in-house) suppliers Tokai Rika for seatbelts and Toyoda Gosei for airbags and steering wheels. These suppliers generally receive most of the Toyota business in Japan, in the same way, Mobis, a major supplier to Hyundai/Kia in South Korea, generally receives a significant part of their business.

Other competitors include Nihon Plast and Ashimori of Japan, Yanfeng and Jinheng of China, Samsong in South Korea and Chris Cintos de Seguranca in South America. Collectively, these competitors account for the majority of the remaining 19% global market share in passive safety.

Additional information concerning ourthe Company's products, markets and competition is included in the “Risks and Risk Management” section under Item 7 of this Annual Report.

Manufacturing and Production

Including joint venture operations, Autoliv has 64 production facilities located in 25 countries, consisting of both component factories and assembly factories. See “Item 2. Properties” for a description of Autoliv’s principal properties. The component factories manufacture inflators, propellant, initiators, textile cushions, webbing, pressed steel parts, springs and overmouldedovermolded steel parts used in seatbelt and airbag assembly and steering wheels. The assembly factories source components from a number of parties, including Autoliv’s own component factories, and assemble complete restraint systems for “just-in-time” delivery to customers. The products manufactured by Autoliv’s consolidated subsidiaries in 20182021 consisted of approximately 151127 million complete seatbelt systems (of which approximately 7982 million were fitted with pretensioners), approximately 9992 million side airbags (including curtain airbags and front center airbags), approximately 5652 million frontal airbagairbags, 0.4 million other airbags and approximately 2018 million steering wheels.

4


Autoliv’s “just-in-time” delivery systems have beensystem is designed to accommodate the specific requirements of each customer for low levels of inventory and rapid stock delivery service. “Just-in-time” deliveries require final assembly or, at least, distribution centers in geographic areas close to customers to facilitate rapid delivery. The fact that the major automobile manufacturers are continually expanding their production activities into more countries and require the same or similar safety systems as those produced in Europe, Japan or the U.S. increases the importance for suppliers to have assembly capacity in several countries. Consolidation among ourthe Company's customers also supports this trend.

Autoliv’s assembly operations generally are not constrained by capacity considerations unless there is a disruption in the supply of raw materials and components. When dramatic shifts in LVP occur, Autoliv can generally adjust capacity in response to any changes in demand within a few days by adding or removing work shifts and within a few months by adding or removing standardized production and assembly lines. Most of Autoliv’s assembly factories can make sufficient space available to accommodate additional production lines to satisfy foreseeable increases in capacity. As a result, Autoliv can usually adjust its manufacturing capacity faster than its customers can adjust their capacity as a result of fluctuations in the general demand for vehicles or in the demand for a specific vehicle model, provided that customers promptly notify Autoliv when they become aware of such changes in demand.

When dramatic shifts in LVP occur or when there is a shift in regional LVP, the capacity adjustments can take more time and be more costly. Additionally, when there is a significant demand for a given product due to a major recall of a competitor’s product, like certain of ourthe Company's customers have experienced, capacity adjustments may take time.

WeThe Company could experience disruption in ourits supply or delivery chain, which could cause one or more of ourits customers to halt or delay production. For more information, see Item 1A – “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report.

Quality Management

Autoliv believes that superior quality is a prerequisite to being considered a leading global supplier of automotive safety systems and is key to ourthe Company's financial performance, because quality excellence is critical for winning new orders, preventing recalls and maintaining low scrap rates. Autoliv has for many years emphasized a “zero-defect” proactive quality policy and continues to strive to improve its working methods. This means both that Autoliv’s products are expected to always meet performance expectations and that Autoliv’s products are expected to be delivered to its customers at the right times and in the right amounts. Furthermore, we believe ourthe Company believes its continued quality improvements further enhance ourthe Company's reputation among ourits customers, employees and governmental authorities.

Although quality has always been paramount in the automotive industry, especially for safety products, automobile manufacturers have become increasingly focused on quality with even less tolerance for any deviations. This intensified focus on quality is partially due to an increase in the number of vehicle recalls for a variety of reasons (not just safety), including a few high-profile vehicle recalls. This trend is likely to continue as automobile manufacturers introduce even stricter quality requirements and regulating agencies and other authorities increase the level of scrutiny given to vehicle safety issues. We haveThe Company has not been immune to the recalls that have been impacting the automotive industry.


We continueThe Company continues to drive ourits quality initiative called “Q5” which was initiated in the summer of 2010. It is an integral part of ourthe Company's strategy of shaping a proactive quality culture of zero defects. It is called “Q5” because it addresses quality in five dimensions: products, customers, growth, behavior and suppliers. The goal of Q5 is to firmly tie together quality with value within all of ourthe Company's processes and for all of ourits employees, thereby leading to the best value for ourits customers. Since 2010, we havethe Company has continually expanded this quality initiative to provide additional skills training to more employees and suppliers. These activities have made a significant contribution tosignificantly improved the reduction in occurrences of non-conforming events.Company's quality performance.

In ourthe Company's pursuit of excellence in quality, we havethe Company has developed a chain of four “defense lines” against potential quality issues. These defense lines consist of: 1) robust product designs, 2) flawless components from suppliers and ourthe Company's own in-house component companies, 3) manufacturing flawless products with a system for verifying that ourthe Company's products conform with specifications and 4) an advanced traceability system in the event of a recall.

OurThe Company's pursuit of quality excellence extends from the earliest phases of product development to the proper disposal of a product following many years of use in a vehicle. Autoliv’s comprehensive Autoliv Product Development System includes several key check points during the process of developing new products that are designed to ensure that such products are well-built and have no hidden defects. Through this process, we workthe Company works closely with ourits suppliers and customers to set clear standards that help to ensure robust component design and lowest cost for function in order to proactively prevent problems and ensure we deliverthe Company delivers only the best designs to the market.

The Autoliv Production System (“APS”), based on the goals of improving quality and efficiency, is at the core of Autoliv’s manufacturing philosophy. APS integrates essential quality elements, such as mistake proofing, statistical process control and operator involvement, into the manufacturing processes so all Autoliv associates are aware of and understand the critical connection between themselves and ourthe Company's lifesaving products. This “zero-defect” principle extends beyond Autoliv to the entire supplier base. All of ourthe Company's suppliers must accept the strict quality standards in the global Autoliv Supplier Manual, which defines ourthe Company's quality requirements and focuses on preventing bad parts from being produced by ourits suppliers and helps eliminate defective intermediate products in ourthe Company's assembly lines as early as possible. In addition, Autoliv’s One Product One Process (“1P1P”) initiative is ourits strategy for developing and managing standardization of both core products and customer-specific features, leading not only to improved quality, but also greater cost efficiency and more efficient supply chain management.

IATF 16949:2016 is one of the automotive industry’s most rigorous global automotivewidely used international standards for quality requirements and all ourmanagement. All of the Company's facilities shippingthat ship products to OEMs are regularly certified according to IAFTthe International Automotive Task Force (IATF) standards.

5


Environmental and Safety Regulations

For information on how environmental and safety regulations impact ourthe Company's business, see “Risk Factors – ‘Our business may be adversely affected by laws or regulations, including environmental, occupational health and safety or other governmental regulations’, “Global climate change could negatively affect our business”, “Our aspirations, goals, and ‘Ourinitiatives related to sustainability and emissions reduction, and our public statements and disclosures regarding them, expose the Company to numerous risks” and “Our business may be adversely affected by changes in automotive safety regulations or concerns that drive further regulation of the automobile safety market’market”” in Item 1A and “Risks and Risk Management” in Item 7 of this Annual Report.

Climate change

The Company is committed to operating its business in an environmentally sustainable manner, meaning developing and producing products in a resource efficient way while limiting the Company's environmental impact in the most material areas of greenhouse gas emissions, energy use, waste and water. With particular emphasis on climate action, the Company actively engages with its customers, suppliers and others to drive sustainable mobility.

In June 2021, the Company launched an updated climate strategy including new long-term climate ambitions:

Carbon neutrality in own operations by 2030
Net-zero across our supply chain by 2040

These industry-leading climate ambitions are aligned with a 1.5°C trajectory and represent a serious step-up in ambition level from earlier short-term climate targets. They should position the Company as the supplier of choice for the most progressive customers, helping to ensure the Company's competitiveness now and in the future. In addition to these ambitions, the Company adopted Science Based Targets (SBT) for 2030 covering its own operations as well as the supply chain. The targets were approved in January 2022 and are available at the SBTi website.

For more information about how climate change impacts the Company's business, see "Operational Risks - Climate impact" in Item 7 and "Risk factors – Our business may be adversely affected by climate change-related risks” in Item 1A of this Annual Report.

Raw Materials

Approximately 50% of our revenues are spent onDirect material purchased directly from external suppliers. Autolivsuppliers represents approximately 50% of the Company's net sales in 2021. The Company mainly purchases manufactured components and raw materials for the operations. We takeits operations. The Company takes several actions to mitigate highercost increases for raw material, prices, such as competitive sourcing and looking for alternative materials.

For information on the sources and availability of raw materials, see "Operational Risks - Component costs" in Item 7 and “Risk Factors – Changes‘Changes in the source.,source, cost, availability of and regulations pertaining to raw materials and components may adversely affect our profit margins”margins’” in Item 1A of this Annual Report.

Intellectual Property

We haveThe Company has developed a considerable amount of proprietary technology related to automotive safety systems and relyrelies on many patents to protect such technology. OurThe Company's intellectual property plays an important role in maintaining ourits competitive position in a number of the markets we serve.the Company serves. For information on ourthe Company's use of intellectual property and its importance to us,the Company, see “Risk Factors – If‘If our patents are declared invalid or our technology infringes on the proprietary rights of others, our ability to compete may be impaired”impaired’” in Item 1A of this Annual Report.

Backlog

Seasonality and Backlog

Autoliv’s business is not subject to significant seasonal fluctuations. AutolivThe Company has frame contracts with automobile manufacturers and such contracts are typically entered into up to three years before the start of production of the relevant car model or platform and provide for a term covering the life of such car model or platform including service parts after a vehicle model is no longer produced. However, typically these contracts do not provide minimum quantities, firm prices or exclusivity but instead permit the automobile manufacturer to resource the relevant products at given intervals (or at any time) from other suppliers.


Dependence on Customers

In 2018 our2021, the Company's top five customers represented around 50%51% of its annual sales and the Company's top ten largest customers represented around 79%.80% of its annual sales. This reflects the concentration of manufacturers in the automotive industry. The five largest OEMs in 20182021 accounted for 49%around 50% of global LVP, and the ten largest OEMs accounted for 74%.around 73% of global LVP. A delivery contract is typically for the lifetime of a vehicle model, which is normally between 4five and 6seven years depending on customer platform sourcing preferences and strategies.

Customer

 

% of Autoliv

Sales

 

 

% of Global

LVP1)

 

Renault/Nissan/Mitsubishi

 

 

15

%

 

 

11

%

VW

 

 

10

%

 

 

12

%

Hyundai/Kia

 

 

8

%

 

 

8

%

Ford

 

 

8

%

 

 

6

%

Honda

 

 

8

%

 

 

6

%

FCA

 

 

8

%

 

 

5

%

Toyota

 

 

7

%

 

 

11

%

Daimler

 

 

6

%

 

 

3

%

General Motors

 

 

4

%

 

 

7

%

BMW

 

 

4

%

 

 

3

%

1)

Source: IHS

CUSTOMER SALES TRENDS

Asian vehicle producers have steadily become increasingly more important to Autoliv, and now represent around 45% of global sales compared to 35% five years ago. Of the Asian OEMs, the Japanese OEMs represent 32% of our sales compared to 24% in 2013. This reflects their increasing share of the global LVP and our stronger market position based on our local presence in Japan. European OEMs accounted for 33% of sales in 2018, virtually unchanged since 2013. The Detroit-3 now account for 19% of our global sales, down from 30% in 2013 this is in part due to GM’s divestiture of Opel and the lingering effects of new business hold back in 2011 and 2012.

For information on ourthe Company's dependence on customers, see “Risk Factors – Our‘Our business could be materially and adversely affected if we lost any of our largest customers or if they were unable to pay their invoices”invoices’” in Item 1A of this Annual Report, and Dependence“Dependence on CustomersCustomers” under the section Risks and Risk Management“Strategic Risks” in Item 7 of this Annual Report, and Note 2220 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

6


Customer sales trends

Asian vehicle producers have steadily become more important to Autoliv and now represent around 45% of the Company's global sales compared to 44% five years ago. The largest increase comes from Japanese OEMs that represented 28% of the Company's global sales five years ago but now account for 32% of the Company's global sales in 2021. This is a result of the Company's stronger market position based on its local presence in Japan. European based brands accounted for 31% of the Company's global sales in 2021. The U.S. based OEMs (including Tesla and Chrysler) accounted for 22% of the Company's global sales in 2021. The local Chinese OEMs as a group accounted for around 4% of the Company's global sales in 2021, with Great Wall representing 2%. One of the strongest growing customers from 2020 to 2021 was Toyota.

Research, Development and Engineering, net (R,D&E)

No single customer project accountsaccounted for more than 2%5% of Autoliv’s total R,D&E, net spending during 2018.2021. To fuel Autoliv’s product portfolio, additional expertise is brought in-house via technology partnerships and licensing agreements.

Information on research, developmentDuring 2021, gross expenditures for R,D&E amounted to $594 million compared to $557 million in 2020. Of these amounts, $203 million in 2021 and $181 million in 2020 were related to customer-funded engineering is included under section “Risksprojects and Risk Management” in Item 7crash tests reimbursed by the customers. Net of this Annual Report.income, R,D&E expenditures increased in 2021 compared to 2020 by approximately 4% to $391 million. Of the R,D&E, net expense in 2021, 80% was for projects and programs where the Company has customer orders, typically related to vehicle models in development. The remaining 20% was not only for completely new innovations but also for improvements of existing products, standardization and cost reduction projects that will yield greater benefits over time.

Regulatory Costs

The fitting of seatbelts in most types of motor vehicles is mandatory in almost all countries and many countries have strict laws regarding the use of seatbelts while in vehicles. In addition, most developed countries require that seats in intercity buses and commercial vehicles be fitted with seatbelts. In the U.S., federal legislation requires frontal airbags on the driver-side and the passenger-side of all new passenger cars since 1998 and in all new lightsport utility vehicles, which are defined as vehicles with an unloaded vehicle weight of approximately 7,700 pounds or less.pickup trucks, and vans since 1999.

For information concerning the material effects on ourthe Company's business relating to ourits compliance with government safety regulations, see “Risk Factors – ‘Our business may be adversely affected by laws or regulations, including environmental, occupational health and safety or other governmental regulations’ and ‘Our business may be adversely affected by changes in automotive safety regulations or concerns that drive further regulation of the automobile safety market’” in Item 1A of this Annual Report and in Item 7 under the section “Risks and Risk Management” of this Annual Report.

7



Human Capital Management

The Company's drive for excellence is what makes Autoliv Personnelthe world’s leading supplier of automotive safety systems. From the earliest stages of product development to sales and design to the final delivery of the finished product, Autoliv's employees are driven by the Company's mission to save more lives.

The successful execution of the Company's strategies relies on its ability to shape a quality and performance-oriented culture, and to adapt quickly to sudden shifts in its circumstances, as illustrated by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. A turbulent external environment presents many challenges but also opportunities. As the Company moves forward its workforce strives to respond with agility to new possibilities to grow and improve the Company's business whilst delivering with excellence to its customers. The Company builds a winning team by focusing on creating a work environment that attracts, retains, and engages its employees. The Company's employees take great pride in working together to provide safety solutions for mobility and society that work in real life situations, and the Company is always looking for new team members who share this passion. For additional information, see the Company's corporate website.

The table below shows the Company's total workforce as of December 31, 2018,2021 and 2020.

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Total workforce

 

 

60,600

 

 

 

68,200

 

Whereof:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Direct workforce in manufacturing

 

 

43,000

 

 

 

50,300

 

Indirect workforce

 

 

17,600

 

 

 

17,900

 

Temporary workforce

 

 

8

%

 

 

11

%

Diversity and Inclusion

When attracting, developing and retaining talent, the Company seeks individuals who hold varied experiences and viewpoints to create an inclusive and diverse workplace that allows each employee to do their best work and drive the Company's collective success. The Company's workforce reflects the diversity of the countries and cultures in which it operates. At the end of 2021, 47% of the Company's workforce and 17% of the Company's senior management positions were filled by women.

The Company has operations in 27 different countries, with 17% of its workforce located in Asia (excluding China), 28% in the Americas, 13% in China, and 42% in Europe (including South Africa, Tunisia, Russia, and Turkey).

The table below show the Company's workforce by age group and gender in % at the end of 2021.

% of Men

Age group

% of Women

3%

>60

1%

5%

51-60

5%

10%

41-50

11%

17%

31-40

15%

16%

21-30

14%

2%

<20

1%

Talent Attraction, Development and Retention

The Company believes that attraction, development, and retention of talent is essential to its success, especially in today's environment. The Company offers an inclusive work environment where its employees are challenged and achieve great things together. Supporting the development of the employees is essential in a highly competitive and rapidly changing environment. An important cornerstone of each employee’s growth is the ongoing dialogue between the team member and manager, which is summarized during an annual Performance and Development Dialogue (PDD). During the year, almost all targeted employees conducted a PDD with their managers. To provide opportunities for professional and personal growth of the employees, the Company has a multitude of development channels, including technical and specialist career paths, international assignments and other such programs. The Company promotes continuous development on the job every day, despite restrictions related to COVID-19.

The Company provides market-based competitive compensation through its salary, annual incentive, and long-term incentive programs and benefits packages that promote employee well-being across all aspects of their lives.

8


Health and Safety

The Company is committed to providing a work environment that promotes the health, safety and welfare of its employees. Each Autoliv facility implements the Company's health and safety management system, which is supported by leadership teams. The implementation of the system is monitored through internal and external audits. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company has protected its subsidiaries had approximately 58,000employee's health and well-being by providing the technology and communication equipment necessary to allow many of its employees to work remotely. For those who cannot effectively do their jobs remotely, the Company has put protocols in place to ensure a safe working environment.

Labor Relations

The Company offers fair terms and approximately 9,000 temporary personnel. Autolivconditions of employment. The Company's overall purpose, Code of Conduct, talent development strategies and employment policies support the principles in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the International Labor Organization’s Fundamental Principles and Labor Standards.

The Company considers its relationship with its personnel to be good. While there have been a small number of minor labor disputes during the year,historically, such disputes have not had a significant or lasting impact on ourthe Company's relationship with ourits employees, customer perception of ourits employee practices or ourits business results.

Major unions to which some of Autoliv’sthe Company's employees belong in Europe include: IG Metall in Germany; Unite the union in the United Kingdom; Confédération Générale des Travailleurs (CGT), Confédération Française Démocratique du Travail (CFDT), Confédération Française de l’Encadrement Confédération Générale des cadres (CFE-CGC), Force Ouvrière (CFE-CGC) and(FO), Confédération Française des Travailleurs Chrétiens (CFTC) and, Solidaires, Unitaires, Démocratiques (SUD) and Conféderation Autonome du Travail (CAT) in France; Union General de Trabajadores (UGT), Union Sindical Obrera (USO), Comisiones Obereras (CCOO) and Confederacion General de Trabajadores (CGT) in Spain; IfIF Metall, Unionen, Sveriges Ingenjörer and Ledarna in Sweden; Industriaal- ja Metallitöötajate Ametiühingute Liit (IMTAL) in Estonia; Vasas Szakszervezeti Szövetség (Hungarian Metallworkers‘ Federation) in Hungary,Hungary; Samorządny NiezaleĪny Związek Zawodowy Pracowników and Zakáadowa Organizacja Związkowa NSZZ SolidarnoĞü in Poland,Poland; National Union of Metal Workers South Africa (NUMSA) in South Africa; Union Générale des Travailleurs Tunisiens (UGTT) and Union des travailleurs Tunisiens (UTT) in Tunisia;Tunisia and Türk Metal SendikasiMontaj ve Yardımcı İşçileri Sendikası in Turkey.

In addition, Autoliv’sthe Company’s employees in other regions are represented by the following unions: Unifor and the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM) in Canada; Sindicato de Jornaleros y Obreros Industriales y de la Industria Maquiladora;Maquiladora de H.Matamoros, Tamaulipas (CTM); Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de la Industria Metalúrgica y Similares (CTM); Sindicato IndustrialNacional de Trabajadores de la PequeñaIndustria Arnesera, Eléctrica, Automotriz y Mediana Industria, Talleres, Maquiladoras, Negociaciones Mercantiles y Comercios, Similares, Anexos y Conexos del EstadoAeronáutica de Querétaro (CTM);la República Mexicana; “Nueva Cultura Laboral” “de trabajadores de la fabricación, manufactura, ensamble de partesautopartes mecánicas y eléctricas y componentes de la industria Automotriz (CROC); Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de la Republica Mexicana”Industria de Autopartes en General y/o Similares, Conexos y sus Servicios de la República Mexicana, in Mexico; Sindicato dos Metalúrgicos de Taubaté e Região in Brazil; Autoliv India Employees Association, Bangalore in India; the Korean Metal Workers Union (FKTU) in Korea; Autoliv Japan Roudou Kumiai in Japan and Federasi Perjuangan Buruh Indonesia (FPBI) in Indonesia.

In many European countries, Canada, Mexico, Brazil and Korea, wages, salaries and general working conditions are negotiated with local unions and/or are subject to centrally negotiated collective bargaining agreements. The terms of ourthe Company's various agreements with unions typically range between 1-3 years. Some of ourthe Company's subsidiaries in Europe, Canada, Mexico, Brazil and Korea must negotiate with the applicable local unions with respect to important changes in operations, working and employment conditions. Twice a year, members of the Company’s management conduct a meeting with the European Works Council (EWC) to provide employee representatives with important information about the Company and a forum for the exchange of ideas and opinions.

In many Asia Pacific countries, the central or regional governments provide guidance each year for salary adjustments or statutory minimum wage for workers.

Autoliv’s The Company's employees may join associations in accordance with local legislation and rules, although the level of unionization varies significantly throughout ourits operations.

For more information concerning Autoliv’s personnel, see Item 7 of this Annual Report.Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

Joint Ventures

Historically, Autoliv established joint ventures to promote its geographical expansion and technology development and to gain assistance in marketing its full product line to automobile manufacturers. While joint ventures are of less importance to our overall business today than inThe table below reflects certain KPIs on which the past, joint ventures remain a potential business model in our strategy.

For informationCompany is particularly focused on how the joint ventures are accounted for, including Autoliv’s percentage of ownership, see Note 9with respect to the Consolidated Financial Statementsmanagement of this Annual Report.its workforce.

KPI

2021

 

2020

 

% of Autoliv facilities certified (OHSAS 18001 or ISO 45001)

 

29

%

 

15

%

Incident rate1)

0.39

 

0.48

 

Severity rate2)

5.51

 

4.26

 

% women in workforce

 

47

%

 

47

%

% women in senior management positions

 

17

%

 

22

%

% PDD rate3)

 

99

%

Close to 100%

 

No. of employees attended at least one training program

 

4,400

 

 

1,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

1) Number of reportable injuries per 200,000 employee hours of exposure.

 

2) Total days away from work due to a work-related reportable injury and/or illness per 200,000 employee hours of exposure.

 

3) Percentage of total employees participating in Autoliv's annual Performance and Development Dialogue (PDD).

 

9


Available information

We fileThe Company files or furnishfurnishes with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) periodic reports and amendments thereto, which include annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and other information. Such reports, amendments, proxy statements and other information are made available free of charge on ourthe Company's corporate website at www.autoliv.comand are available as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with the SEC. OurThe Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines, committee charters, code of conduct and other documents governing the Company are also available on ourits corporate website at www.autoliv.com. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy statements and other information at www.sec.gov. Hard copies of the above-mentioned documents can be obtained free of charge fromby contacting the Company by contacting us at: Autoliv, Inc., P.O. Box 70381, SE-107 24, Stockholm, Sweden or Autoliv, Inc., c/o Autoliv Electronics America, 26545 American Drive, Southfield, MI 48034.


Sweden.

10


Item 1A. RiskRisk Factors

Our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows may be impacted by a number of factors. A discussion of the risks associated with these material risk factors is included below.

RISKS RELATED TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC

We face risks related to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic that have, and are expected to continue to have, an adverse impact on our business and financial performance

The COVID-19 pandemic has created significant volatility in the global economy and led to significant reduced economic activity and employment and has disrupted, and may continue to disrupt, the global automotive industry and customer sales, production volumes and purchases of light vehicles by end-consumers. The spread of COVID-19 has also caused disruptions in the manufacturing, delivery and overall supply chains of automobile manufacturers and suppliers. Global light vehicle production ("LVP") has been lower than expected, and is expected to continue to be very volatile. As a result, we have modified our production schedules and have experienced, and may continue to experience, delays in the production and distribution of our products and a decline in sales to our customers. As production resumes by us and our customers, production volumes have been and may continue to be volatile. We have also taken protective measures to modify our production environment to ensure the health and safety of our workers which has had an impact on our productivity. Additionally, if the global economic effects caused by the pandemic continue or increase, overall customer demand may decrease, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, if a significant portion of our workforce or our suppliers' or customers’ workforces are affected by COVID-19 either directly or due to government closures or otherwise, associated work stoppages or facility closures would halt or delay production. The full extent of the effect of the pandemic on us, our customers, our supply chain or the global supply chain and our business will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the duration and severity of the outbreak, subsequent outbreaks or the extent of any recession resulting from the pandemic. We may continue to experience the effects of the pandemic even after it has waned, and our business, results of operations and financial condition could continue to be affected. In particular, if COVID-19, including its variants, continues to spread or re-emerges, particularly in the United States, Europe and China, where our operations are most concentrated, resulting in a prolonged period of travel, commercial, social and other similar restrictions, we could experience, among other things: (i) adverse impacts on our operations and financial results caused by government and regulatory measures to contain or mitigate the spread of the virus, temporary closures of our facilities or the facilities of our customers or suppliers, which could impact our ability to timely meet our customers’ orders or negatively impact our supply chain; (ii) the failure of third parties on which we rely or on which our customers rely, including our suppliers, customers, contractors, commercial banks and external business partners, to meet their respective obligations to the Company, or significant disruptions in their ability to do so, which may be caused by their own financial or operational difficulties including bankruptcy or default; (iii) labor shortages and other disruptions or restrictions on our employees’ ability to work effectively, due to illness, quarantines, travel bans, shelter-in-place orders or other limitations; (iv) interruptions to the operations of our business if the health of our executives, management personnel and other employees are affected, particularly if a significant number of individuals are impacted; (v) any accident, COVID-19 illness, or injury to our employees could result in litigation, manufacturing delays and harm to our reputation, which could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition; (vi) changes in prices of tooling and services may be impacted by worldwide demand and by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and any such price increases could materially increase our operating costs and adversely affect our profit margin; (vii) governments and regulators may choose to delay new automobile safety regulations which could impact the average global content of passive safety systems per light vehicle in the near term; (viiI) some of our competitors are (or may be) owned by a governmental entity and/or receive various forms of governmental aid or support, which we may not be eligible for, and which may put us at a competitive disadvantage; (ix) increased cybersecurity and privacy risks and risks related to the reliability of technology to support remote operations; (x) sudden and/or severe declines in the market price of our common stock; and (xi) costs incurred and revenues lost during and from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic likely will not be recoverable. In addition to the risks specifically described above, the impact of COVID-19 is likely to implicate and exacerbate other risks disclosed in Item 1A of this Annual Report, any of which could have a material effect on our operating results, cash flows, or financial condition.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR INDUSTRY

The cyclical nature of automotive sales and production can adversely affect our business. Our business is directly related to light vehicle production (“LVP”)LVP in the global market and by our customers, and automotive sales and LVP are the most important drivers for our sales

Automotive sales and production are highly cyclical and can be affected by general or regional economic or industry conditions, the level of consumer demand, recalls and other safety issues, labor relations issues, technological changes, fuel prices and availability, vehicle safety regulations and other regulatory requirements, governmental initiatives, trade agreements, political volatility, especially in energy producing countries and growth markets, changes in interest rate levels and credit availability and other factors. Some regions around the world may at various times be more particularly impacted by these factors than other regions. Economic declines that result in a significant reduction in automotive sales and production by our customers have in the past had, and may in the future have, a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our sales are also affected by inventory levels of our customers. We cannot predict when our customers will decide to either increase or reduce inventory levels or whether new inventory levels will approximate historical inventory levels. This may exacerbate variability in our salesorder intake and, as a result, our revenues and financial condition. Uncertainty regarding inventory levels may be exacerbated by consumer financing programs initiated or terminated by our customers or governments as such changes may affect the timing of their sales.

Changes in automotive sales and LVP and/or customers’ inventory levels will have an impact on our long-term targets, earnings guidance and estimates and anyestimates. In addition, we base our growth projections in part on business awards, or order intake, made by our customers. However, actual production orders from our customers may not approximate the awarded business or our estimated order intake. Any significant reduction in automotive sales and/or LVP by our customers, whether due to general economic conditions or any other factors relevant to sales or LVP, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

11


Growth rates in safety content per vehicle, which can be impacted by changes in consumer trends and political decisions, could affect our results in the future

The Company estimates that the average global content of passive safety systems per light vehicle grew slightly   during the period 2016-2018increased in 2021 to around $225.$250. Vehicles produced in different markets may have various passive safety content values. For example, in developed markets such as Western Europe and North America, the premium segment havehas an average passive safety content values of more than $300around $360 per vehicle, whereas in growth markets such as China and India the average passive safety content per vehicle is approximately $180$220 and $80,$90, respectively. Due to the majority of the growth in global LVP over time being concentrated in growth markets, theour operating results may be impacted if the passive safety content per vehicle remains low and if the penetration of more advanced automotive safety systems does not increase in these regions. As passive safety content per vehicle is also an indicator of our sales development, should these trends continue, the average value of passive safety systems per vehicle could decline.

We operate in a highly competitive market

The market for occupant restraint systems is highly competitive and continues to consolidate.competitive. We compete with a number of other companies that produce and sell similar products. Among other factors, our products compete on the basis of price, quality, manufacturing and distribution capability, design and performance, technological innovation, delivery and service. Some of our competitors are subsidiaries (or divisions, units or similar) of companies that are larger and have greater financial and other resources than us. Some of our competitors may also have a “preferred status” as a result of special relationships or ownership interests with certain customers. Our ability to compete successfully depends, in large part, on our success in continuing to innovate and manufacture products that have commercial success with consumers, differentiating our products from those of our competitors, continuing to deliver quality products in the time frames required by our customers, and maintaining best-cost production.

We continue to invest in technology and innovation which we believe will be critical to our long-term growth. Our ability to maintain and improve existing products, while successfully developing and introducing distinctive new and enhanced products that anticipate changing customer and consumer preferences and capitalize upon emerging technologies will be a significant factor in our ability to remain competitive. If we are unsuccessful or are less successful than our competitors in predicting the course of market development, developing innovative products, processes, and/or use of materials or adapting to new technologies or evolving regulatory, industry or customer requirements, we may be placed at a competitive disadvantage.disadvantage. For example, the focus of the automotive industry on the development of advanced driver assistance technologies, with the goal of developing and introducing autonomous vehicles, and increase in consumer preferences for mobility on demand services may create demand for new and innovative products in response to OEM and consumer preferences and our success in providing such products will be critical for our long-term growth. Similarly, the demand for our products historically has tracked LVP and a future evolution of the automotive industry to autonomous vehicles and mobility on demand services may lead to a future reduction in annual global LVP. Additionally, our customers are increasingly focused on developing electric vehicles. If we fail to be awarded business on electric vehicle models, it will harm our future business prospects. Our competitive environment continues to change, including because of recent acquisitions and divestitures by our existing competitors (including Delphi and Takata) within recent years as well as increased competition from entrants outside the traditional automotive industry, creating uncertaintyuncertainty about the future competitive landscape. Given the competitive nature of our business, the amount of awards we are awarded relative to our peers may decrease over time. The inability to compete successfully could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.


The discontinuation, lack of commercial success, or loss of business with respect to a particular vehicle model for which we are a significant supplier could reduce our sales and harm our business

A number of our customer contracts generally require us to supply a customer’s annual requirements for a particular vehicle model and assembly facilities, rather than for manufacturing a specific quantity of products. Such contracts range from one year to the life of the model, which is generally four to seven years. These contracts are often subject to renegotiation, sometimes as frequent as on an annual basis, which may affect product pricing, and generally may be terminated by our customers at any time. Therefore, the discontinuation of, the loss of business with respect to, or a lack of commercial success of a particular vehicle model or brand for which we are a significant supplier could reduce our sales and harm our business prospects, operating results, cash flows, or financial condition.

We are working to expand our product offerings beyond light vehicles to include a variety of powered two wheeled personal vehicles. If we are not successful in expanding our product offerings or if it takes longer or costs are more than expected, it could harm our business

The Company is working to expand its product offerings to focus on mobile safety solutions. The expansion of our product offering will require us to develop innovative products and to reach new customers. If we are not successful in expanding our product offerings or if it takes longer or costs are more than expected, it could negatively impact our financial results and future business prospects.

12


RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

We may incur material losses and costs as a result of product liability, warranty and recall claims that may be brought against us or our customers

We face risks related to product liability claims, warranty claims and recalls in the event that any of our products actually or allegedly are defective, fail to perform as expected or the use of our products results, or is alleged to result, in bodily injury and/or property damage. For example, we are cooperating with Toyota Motor Corp. with respect to its voluntary safety recall of approximately 1.4 million vehicles that are equipped with a certain model of our side curtain airbags (the “Toyota Recall”). We may not be able to anticipate all of the possible performance or reliability problems that could arise with our products after they are released to the market. Additionally, increasing regulation and reporting requirements regarding potentially defective products, particularly in the U.S., may increase the possibility that we become involved in additional product liability or recall investigations or claims. See – “Our business may be adversely affected by changes in automotive safety regulations or concerns that drive further regulation of the automobile safety market”. Although we currently carry product liability and product recall insurance in excess of our self-insured amounts, no assurance can be made that such insurance will provide adequate coverage against potential claims, such insurance is available or will continue to be available in the appropriate markets, or that we will be able to obtain such insurance on acceptable terms in the future.future as the cost of such insurance has risen in recent years and the cost of our self-insurance program has risen as well. Although we have invested and will continue to invest in our engineering, design, and quality infrastructure, we cannot give any assurance that our products will not suffer from defects or other deficiencies or that we will not experience material warranty claims or additional product recalls. In the future, we could experience additional material warranty or product liability losses and incur significant costs to process and defend these claims.

The Toyota Recall and A successful claim brought against us in excess of available insurance coverage, if any, additional futureor a requirement to participate in any product recall, could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, cash flows or financial condition. Future recalls from this customer or other customers could result in costs not covered by insurance in excess of our self-insurance, further government inquiries, litigation and reputational harm and could divert management’s attention away from other matters. The main variables affecting the costs of a recall are the number of vehicles ultimately determined to be affected by the issue, the cost per vehicle associated with a recall, the determination of proportionate responsibility among the customer, the Company, and any relevant sub-suppliers, and actual insurance recoveries. Every vehicle manufacturer has its own practices regarding product recalls and other product liability actions relating to its suppliers, and the performance and remedial requirements vary between jurisdictions. Due to recent recall activity in the automotive industry over the past decade, some vehicle manufactures have become even more sensitive to product recall risks. As suppliers become more integrally involved in the vehicle design process and assume more of the vehicle assembly functions, vehicle manufacturers are increasingly looking to their suppliers for contribution when faced with recalls and product liability claims. Product recalls in our industry, even when they do not involve our products, can harm the reputations of our customers, competitors, and us, particularly if those recalls cause consumers to question the safety or reliability of products similar to those we produce.

In addition, with global platforms and procedures, vehicle manufacturers are increasingly evaluating our quality performance on a global basis; any one or more quality, warranty or other recall issue(s) (including issues affecting few units and/or having a small financial impact) may cause a vehicle manufacturer to implement measures which may have a severe impact on our operations, such as a global, temporary or prolonged suspension of new orders. In addition, as our products more frequently use global designs and are based on or utilize the same or similar parts, components or solutions, there is a risk that the number of vehicles affected globally by a failure or defect will increase significantly with a corresponding increase in our costs. A warranty, recall or product liability claim brought against us in excess of our available insurance may have a material adverse effect on our business. Vehicle manufacturers are also increasingly requiring their outside suppliers to guarantee or warrant their products and bear the costs of repair and replacement of such products under new vehicle warranties. A vehicle manufacturer may attempt to hold us responsible for some or the entire repair or replacement costs of defective products under new vehicle warranties, when the product supplied did not perform as represented. Accordingly, the future costs of warranty claims by our customers may be material. However, the final amounts determined to be due related to these matters could differ materially from our recorded warranty estimates and our business prospects, operating results, cash flows or financial condition may be materially impacted as a result.

In addition, as we adopt new technology, we face an inherent risk of exposure to the claims of others that we have allegedly violated their intellectual property rights. We cannot assure that we will not experience any material warranty, product liability or intellectual property claim losses in the future or that we will not incur significant costs to defend such claims. See “If our patents are declared invalid or our technology infringes on the proprietary rights of others, our ability to compete may be impaired”.

Escalating pricing pressures from our customers may adversely affect our business

The automotive industry continues to experience aggressive pricing pressure from customers. This trend is partly attributable to the major automobile manufacturers’ strong purchasing power. As with other automotive component manufacturers, we are often expected to quote fixed prices or are forced to accept prices with annual price reduction commitments for long-term sales arrangements or discounted reimbursements for engineering work. Price reductions have impacted our sales and profit margins and are expected to continue to do so in the future. Our future profitability will depend upon, among other things, our ability to continuously reduce our cost per unit and maintain our cost structure, enabling us to remain cost-competitive.


Our profitability is also influenced by our success in designing and marketing technological improvements in automotive safety systems, which helps us offset price reductions by our customers. If we are unable to offset continued price reductions through improved operating efficiencies and reduced expenditures, these price reductions may have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, operating results, cash flows or financial condition.

13


We could experience disruption in our supply or delivery chain, which could cause one or more of our customers to halt or delay production

We, as with other component manufactures in the automotive industry, ship our products to customer vehicle assembly facilities throughout the world on a “just-in-time” basis in order for our customers to maintain low inventory levels. Our suppliers (external suppliers as well as our own production sites) use a similar method in providing raw materials to us. However, this “just-in-time” method makes the logistics supply chain in our industry very complex and vulnerable to disruption.

Disruptions in our supply chain may result for many reasons, including closures of one of our own or one of our suppliers’ facilities or critical manufacturing lines due to strikes or other labor disputes, mechanical failures, electrical outages, fires, explosions, critical pollution levels, critical health and safety and other working conditions issues (including epidemics and pandemics, such as the coronavirus (COVID-19)), natural disasters political upheaval, as well as logistical complications due to labor disruptions, weather or natural disasters, acts of terrorism, mechanical failures and legislation or regulation regarding the transport of hazardous goods. Additionally, we may experience disruptions if there are newly imposed trade restrictions or delays in customs processing, including if we are unable to obtain government authorization to export or import certain materials, including materials that may be viewed as dangerous such as the propellant used for our inflators. As we continue to expand in growth markets, the risk of such disruptions is heightened. The unavailability of even a single small subcomponent necessary to manufacture one of our products, for whatever reason, could force us to cease production of that product, possibly for a prolonged period. Similarly, a potential quality issue could force us to halt deliveries while we validate the products. Even where products are ready to be shipped, or have been shipped, delays may arise before they reach our customer. Also, similar difficulties for other suppliers may force our customers to halt production, which may in turn impact our sales shipments to such customers.

When we fail to timely deliver, we may have to absorb our own costs for identifying and resolving the ultimate problem as well as expeditiously producing and shipping replacement components or products. Generally, we must also carry the costs associated with “catching up,” such as overtime and premium freight.

If we are the cause of a customer being forced to halt production, the customer may seek to recoup all of its losses and expenses from us. These losses and expenses could be very significant and may include consequential losses such as lost profits. Where a customer halts production because of another supplier failing to deliver on time, we may not be fully compensated, if at all.

Thus, any such supply chain disruptions could severely impact our operations and/or those of our customers and force us to halt production for prolonged periods of time which could expose us to material claims for compensation and have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, operating results, or financial condition.

Adverse developments affecting one or more of our major suppliers could harm our profitability

Any significant disruption in our supplier relationships, particularly relationships with single-source suppliers, could harm our profitability. Furthermore, some of our suppliers may not be able to sufficiently manage the currency commodity cost volatility and/or sharply changing volumes while still performing as we expect. For example, recalls or field actions from our customers can stress the capacity of our supply chain and may inhibit our ability to timely deliver order volumes. Over time, more of our suppliers are located in growth markets. As such, there is an increased riskWe may incur costs as we try to make contingency plans to manage the risks for delivery delays, production delays, production issues or delivery of non-conforming products by our suppliers. Even where these risks do not materialize, we may incur costs as we try to make contingency plans for such risks.

Changes in the source, cost, availability of and regulations pertaining to raw materials and components may adversely affect our profit margins

Our business uses a broad range of raw materials and components in the manufacture of our products, nearly all of which are generally available from a number of qualified suppliers. Our industry may be affected from time to time by limited supplies or price fluctuations of certain key components and materials. Strong worldwide demand for certain raw materials has had a significant impact on prices and short-term availability in recent years.years, including in 2021. Such price increases have and could materially increase our operating costs and materially and adversely affect our profit margin, as direct material costs amounted to approximately 50% of our net sales in 2018,2021, of which approximately half is the raw material cost portion.

Inflation is currently high world-wide and may continue for some time. Commercial negotiations with our customers and suppliers may not always offset all of the adverse impact of higher raw material, energy and commodity costs. Even where we are able to pass price increases along to our customer, there may be a lapse of time before we are able to do so such that we must absorb the cost increase. In addition, no assurances can be given that the magnitude and duration of such cost increases or any future cost increases could not have a larger adverse impact on our profitability and consolidated financial position than currently anticipated.


The SEC requires Additionally, various government regulators require companies that manufacture products containing certain minerals and their derivatives that are known as “conflict minerals”, originating from the Democratic Republic of Congo or adjoining countries to diligence and report the source of such materials. There are significant resources associated with complying with these requirements, including diligence efforts to determine the sources of conflict minerals used in our products and potential changes to our processes or supplies as a consequence of such diligence efforts. As there may be only a limited number of suppliers able to offer certified “conflict free” conflict minerals, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain necessary conflict free minerals from such suppliers in sufficient quantities or at competitive prices. We may face reputational challenges if we determine that certain of our products contain minerals not determined to be conflict free or if we are unable to sufficiently verify the origins for all conflict minerals used in our products through the procedures we may implement. Furthermore, our customers are also increasingly requiring us to track sustainable sources of certain raw materials, which also requires additional diligence efforts and there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain these materials in a cost-efficient and sustainable manner. Accordingly, these rules and customer requirements may adversely affect our business prospects, operating results, cash flows or financial condition.

14


Our business could be materially and adversely affected if we lost any of our largest customers or if they were unable to pay their invoices

We are dependent on a few large customers with strong purchasing power. This is the result of customer consolidation duringin the last few decades. In 2018,2021, our top five customers represented 50%around 51% of our consolidated sales. Our largest contract accounted for around 2% of our total fiscal 2018 sales and expires in 2025.2021 sales. Although business with any given customer is typically split into several contracts (either on the basis of one contract per vehicle model or on a broader platform basis), the loss of business from any of our major customers (whether by lower overall demand for vehicles, cancellation of existing contracts or the failure to award us new business) could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Similarly, further consolidation of our customers in the future could make us more reliant upon a smaller group of customers for a significant portion of our consolidated sales and negatively impact our bargaining power when contracting with such customers.

Customers may put us on a “new business hold,” which would limit our ability to quote or be awarded all or part of their future vehicle contracts if quality or other issues arise in the vehicles for which we were a supplier. Such new business holds range in length and scope and are generally accompanied by a certain set of remedial conditions that must be met before we are eligible to bid for new business. Meeting any such conditions within the prescribed timeframe may require additional Company resources. A failure to satisfy any such conditions may have a materiallymaterial adverse impact on our financial results in the long term.

There is a risk that one or more of our major customers may be unable to pay our invoices as they become due or that a customer will simply refuse to make such payments given its financial difficulties. If a major customer would enter into bankruptcy proceedings or similar proceedings whereby contractual commitments are subject to stay of execution and the possibility of legal or other modification, or if a major customer otherwise successfully procures protection against us legally enforcing its obligations, it is likely, absent special relief such as having a “preferred status”, that we will be forced to record a substantial loss.

Additional information concerning our major customers is included in Note 2220 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements in this Annual Report.

Our inability to effectively manage the timing, quality and costs of new program launches could adversely affect our financial performance

To compete effectively in the automotive supply industry, we must be able to launch new products to meet our customers’ timing, performance and quality standards. At times, we face an uneven number of launches, and some launches for various reasons, may have shortened launch lead times. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to install and certify the equipment needed to produce products for new programs in time for the start of production, or that the transitioning of our manufacturing facilities and resources to full production for such new programs will not impact production rates or other operational efficiency measures at our facilities. In addition, we cannot provide assurance that our customers will execute on schedule the launch of their new product programs, for which we might supply products. Additionally, as a Tier 1 supplier, we must effectively coordinate the activities of numerous suppliers in order to launch programs successfully. Given the complexity of new program launches, especially involving new and innovative technologies, we may experience difficulties managing product quality, timeliness and associated costs. In addition, new program launches require a significant ramp up of costs; however, the sales related to these new programs generally are dependent upon the timing and success of the introduction of new vehicles by the Company’s customers. Our inability to effectively manage the timing, quality and costs of these new program launches could adversely affect our business prospects, operating results, cash flows or financial condition.

Changes in our product mix may impact our financial performance

We sell products that have varying profit margins. Our financial performance can be impacted depending on the mix of products we sell during a given period. Our earnings guidance and estimates assume a certain geographic sales mix as well as a product sales mix. If actual results vary significantly from this projected geographic and product mix of sales, our operating results and financial condition could be negatively impacted.

We are involved from time to time in legal proceedings and our business may suffer as a result of adverse outcomes of current or future legal proceedings

We are, from time to time, involved in litigation, regulatory proceedings and commercial or contractual disputes that may be significant. These matters may include, without limitation, disputes with our suppliers and customers, intellectual property claims, shareholder litigation, government investigations, class action lawsuits, personal injury claims, product liability claims, environmental issues, antitrust, customs and VAT disputes and employment and tax issues. In such matters, government agencies or private parties may seek to recover from us very large, indeterminate amounts in penalties or monetary damages (including, in some cases, treble or punitive damages) or seek to limit our operations in some


way. For example, on December 31, 2021, a U.S. federal court entered an order requiring Autoliv to pay approximately $114 million, approximately $14 million in actual compensatory damages and $100 million in punitive damages, because Autoliv manufactured the seatbelt that was involved in an accident. The Company has sought reconsideration of the verdict and, if necessary, will appeal this decision. The possibility exists that claims may be asserted against us and their magnitude may remain unknown for long periods of time. These types of lawsuits could require a significant managementamount of management’s time and attention and a substantial legal liability or adverse regulatory outcome and the substantial expenses to defend the litigation or regulatory proceedings may have a material adverse effect on our customer relationships, business prospects, reputation, operating results, cash flows and financial condition. No assurances can be given that such proceedings and claims will not have a material adverse impact on our profitability and consolidated financial position or that our established reserves or our available insurance will mitigate such impact.

See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report.

We are currently undergoing an antitrust investigation by the European Commission and have accrued an amount regarding this investigation that may not fully reflect the ultimate cost to resolve the EC’s investigation15


The European Commission (“EC”) is engaged in a long-running investigation into possible anti-competitive behavior among certain suppliers to the automotive vehicle industry, including Autoliv. From June 7 to June 9, 2011, representatives of the EC visited two facilities of Autoliv BV & Co KG, a Company subsidiary in Germany, to gather information for such inquiry. Autoliv has been cooperating with the EC investigation. The EC previously concluded a discrete portion of its investigation in November 2017 and imposed a fine on the Company. In December 2018, we accrued $210 million based on our belief that the EC will seek to impose a fine in connection with the remaining portion of the EC’s investigation. The EC investigation requires significant management time and attention and could, in addition to an unfavorable outcome, result in significant expenses. Unfavorable outcomes from the EC investigation could have a material adverse impact on our customer relationships, business prospects, reputation, operating condition, cash flows or financial results, and our insurance may not mitigate such impact.

We may be subject to civil antitrust litigation civil antitrust litigation that could negatively impact our business

The Company may be subject to civil antitrust lawsuits in the future in countries that permit such civil claims, including lawsuits or other actions by our customers. Specifically,The Company was previously the subject of any investigation by the European Commission (“EC”) regarding possible anti-competitive behavior among certain suppliers to the automotive vehicle industry. The Company paid a fine to resolve these matters in 2019. As a result of the outcome of the EC investigation, we are and we could also result inbe subject to subsequent civil disputes with non-governmental third parties and civil or stockholder litigation stemming from the same facts and circumstances underlying the EC investigation. These types of lawsuits require significant management time and attention and could result in significant expenses as well as unfavorable outcomes that could have a material adverse impact on our customer relationships, businessbusiness prospects, reputation, operating results, cash flows or financial condition, and our insurance may not mitigate such impact.

We are, and have been, subject to investigations by other competition authorities and may be subject to investigations by additional competition authorities that could negatively impact our business

Competition authorities in Brazil, Canada, South Africa and South Korea have previously initiated investigations of certain suppliers See Note 17 to the automotive vehicle industry, including Autoliv. Competition authoritiesConsolidated Financial Statements in additional countries may initiate similar investigations. These types of investigations require significant management time and attention. These investigations could also result in significant expenses as well as unfavorable outcomes that could have a material adverse impact on our customer relationships, business prospects, reputation, operating results, cash flows or financial condition, and our available insurance may not mitigate such impact.this Annual Report.

We may have exposure to greater than anticipated tax liabilities

The determination of our worldwide provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities requires estimation and significant judgment, and there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Like many other multinational corporations, we are subject to tax in multiple U.S. and foreign tax jurisdictions. Our determination of our tax liability is always subject to audit and review by applicable domestic and foreign tax authorities, and we are currently undergoing a number of investigations, audits and reviews by taxing authorities throughout the world. Any adverse outcome of any such audit or review could have a negative effect on our business and the ultimate tax outcome may differ from the amounts recorded in our financial statements and may materially affect our financial results in the period or periods for which such determination is made. While we have established reserves based on assumptions and estimates that we believe are reasonable to cover such eventualities, these reserves may prove to be insufficient. In addition, our future income taxes could be adversely affected by earnings being lower than anticipated (or by the incurrence of losses) in jurisdictions that have lower statutory tax rates and higher than anticipated in jurisdictions that have higher statutory tax rates, by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, or changes in tax laws, regulations or accounting principles, as well as certain discrete items.

Work stoppages, slow-downs or other labor issues at our customers’ facilities or at our facilities could adversely affect our operations

Because the automotive industry relies heavily on “just-in-time” delivery of components during the assembly and manufacture of vehicles, a work stoppage or slow-down at one or more of the Company’s facilities could have a material adverse effectseffect on our business. Similarly, if any of our customers were to experience a work stoppage or slow-down, that customer may halt or limit the purchase of our products. Similarly, a work stoppage or slow-down at another supplier could interrupt production at one of our customers’ facilities which would have the same effect. While labor contract negotiations at our facilities historically have rarely resulted in work stoppages, no assurances can be given that we will be able to negotiate acceptable contracts with these unions or that our failure to do so will not result in work stoppages. A work stoppage or other labor disruption at one or more of our facilities or our customers’ facilities could cause us to shut down production facilities supplying these products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.


Our ability to operate our company effectively could be impaired if we fail to attract and retain executive officers and other key personnel

Our ability to operate our business and implement our strategies effectively depends, in part, on the efforts of our executive officers and other key employees. In addition, our future success will depend on, among other factors, our ability to attract, develop and retain other qualified personnel, particularly engineers and other employees with software and technical expertise. The loss of the services of any of our executive officers or other key employees or the failure to attract, develop or retain other qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Restructuring and efficiency initiatives and capacity alignments are complex and difficult and at any time additional restructuring steps may be necessary, possibly on short notice and at significant cost

Our restructuring and efficiency initiatives and capacity alignments include efforts to adjust our manufacturing capacity and cost structure to meet current and projected operational and market requirements, including plant closures, transfer of sourcing to best cost countries, consolidation of our supplier base and standardization of products, to reduce our overhead costs and consolidate our operational centers. The successful implementation of our restructuring activities and capacity alignments will involve sourcing, logistics, technology and employment arrangements. Because these restructuring and efficiency initiatives and capacity alignments can be complex, there may be difficulties or delays in the implementation of any such initiatives and capacity alignments or they may not be immediately effective, resulting in an adverse material impact on our performance. In addition, there is a risk that inflation, high-turnover rates and increased competition may reduce the efficiencies now available in best-cost countries to levels that no longer allow for cost-beneficial restructuring opportunities. Therefore, there can be no assurances that any future restructurings or capacity alignments will be completed as planned or achieve the desired results. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report.

16


A prolonged recession and/or a downturn in our industry could result in us having insufficient funds to continue our operations and external financing may not be available to us or available only on materially different terms than what has historically been available

Our ability to generate cash from our operations is highly dependent on automotive sales and LVP, the global economy and the economies of our important markets. If LVP were to remain on low levels for an extended period of time, we would experience a significantly negative cash flow. Similarly, if cash losses for customer defaults rise sharply, we would experience a negative cash flow. Such negative cash flow could result in our having insufficient funds to continue our operations unless we can procure external financing, which may not be possible.

Our access to debt, securitization, or derivative markets around the world at competitive rates or in sufficient amounts could be affected by credit rating downgrades, market volatility, market disruption, regulatory requirements, or other factors. Our ability to obtain unsecured funding at a reasonable cost is dependent on our credit ratings or our perceived creditworthiness. Our current credit rating could be lowered as a result of us experiencing significant negative cash flows, increasing our indebtedness and leverage, or a dire financial outlook, which may affect our ability to procure financing. We may also for the same, or other reasons, find it difficult to secure new long-term credit facilities, at reasonable terms, when our principal credit facility expires in 2022.2023. Further, even our existing unutilized credit facilities may not be available to us as agreed, or only at additional cost, if participating banks are unable to raise the necessary funds, where, for instance, financial markets are not functioning as expected or one or more banks in our principal credit facility syndicate were to default. IfAs a result, we cannot assure you that we will continue to have sufficient liquidity to meet our operating needs. In the event that we do not have sufficient external financing, is unavailable to us when necessary, we may have insufficient fundsbe required to continueseek additional capital, sell assets, reduce or cut back our operations.

operating activities or otherwise alter our business strategy. Information concerning our credit facilities and other financings are included in Item 7 in this Annual Report in the section headed “Treasury Activities” and in Note 1413 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report.

Our indebtedness may harm our financial condition and results of operations

As of December 31, 2018,2021, we have outstanding debt of $2.2$2.0 billion. We may incur additional debt for a variety of reasons. Although our significant credit facilities and debt agreements do not have any financial covenants, our level of indebtedness will have several important effects on our future operations, including, without limitation:

a portion of our cash flows from operations will be dedicated to the payment of any interest or could be used for amortization required with respect to outstanding indebtedness;

increases in our outstanding indebtedness and leverage will increase our vulnerability to adverse changes in general economic and industry conditions, as well as to competitive pressure;

depending on the levels of our outstanding debt, our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, acquisitions, capital expenditures, general corporate and other purposes may be limited; and

potential future tightening of the availability of capital both from financial institutions and the debt markets may have an adverse effect on our ability to access additional capital.

Governmental restrictions may impact our business adversely

Some of our customers are (or may be) owned by a governmental entity, receive various forms of governmental aid or support or are subject to governmental influence in other forms, which may impact us as a supplier to these customers. As a result, they may be required to partner with local entities or procure components from local suppliers to achieve a specific local content or be subject to other restrictions regarding localized content or ownership. The nature and form of any such restrictions or protections, whatever their basis, is very difficult to predict as is their potential impact. However, they are likely to be based on political rather than economical or operational considerations and may materially impact our business.


Impairment charges relating to our assets, goodwill and other intangible assets could adversely affect the Company’sour financial performance

We periodically review the carrying value of our assets, goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment indicators. If one or more of our customers’ facilities cease production or decrease their production volumes, the assets we carry related to our facilities serving such customers may decrease in value because we may no longer be able to utilize or realize them as intended. Where such decreases are significant, such impairments may have a materiallymaterial adverse impact on our financial results. We monitor the various factors that impact the valuation of our goodwill and other intangible assets, including expected future cash flow levels, global economic conditions, market price for our stock, and trends with our customers. Impairment of goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets may result from, among other things, deterioration in our performance and especially the cash flow performance of these goodwill assets, adverse market conditions and adverse changes in applicable laws or regulations. If there are changes in these circumstances or the other variables associated with the estimates, judgments and assumptions relating to the valuation of goodwill, when assessing the valuation of our goodwill items, we may determine that it is appropriate to write down a portion of our goodwill or intangible assets and record related non-cash impairment charges. In the event that we determine that we are required to write-down a portion of our goodwill items and other intangible assets and thereby record related non-cash impairment charges, our financial condition and operating results would be adversely affected.

For additional information, see Part II, Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Significant Accounting Policies and Critical Accounting Estimates – Goodwill and Intangibles”.

We face risks related to our defined benefit pension plans and employee benefit plans, including the need for additional funding as well as higher costs and liabilities

Our defined benefit pension plans orand employee benefit plans may require additional funding or give rise to higher related costs and liabilities which, in some circumstances, could reach material amounts and negatively affect our operating results. We are required to make certain year-end assumptions regarding our pension plans. Our pension obligations are dependent on several factors, including factors outside our control such as changes in interest rates, the market performance of the diversified investments underlying the pension plans, actuarial data and adjustments and an increase in the minimum funding requirements or other regulatory changes governing the plans. Adverse equity market conditions and volatility in the credit market may have an unfavorable impact on the value of our pension assets and our future estimated pension liabilities. Internal factors such as an adjustment to the level of benefits provided under the plans may also lead to an increase in our pension liability. If these or other internal and external risks were to occur, alone or in combination, our required contributions to the plans and the costs and net liabilities associated with the plans could increase substantially and have a material effect on our business.

Information concerning our benefit plans is included in Note 2018 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements in this Annual Report.

You should17


We may not anticipatebe able to, or expect the payment of cashwe may decide not to, pay dividends or repurchase shares at a level anticipated by our shareholders, which could reduce shareholder returns

The extent to which we pay dividends on our common stock

Our dividend policy and repurchase our common stock in the future is subject toat the discretion of our Board of Directors and depends upon a number of factors, including our earnings, financial condition, cash and capital needs, indebtedness and leverage, and general economic or business conditions. AlthoughNo assurance can be given that we currently usewill be able to or will choose to pay any dividends as a way to return valueor repurchase any shares in the foreseeable future.

Cybersecurity incidents or other damage to our stockholders, in the past our Board of Directors suspended our quarterly dividend after determining that a suspension was necessary in light of the decline in global LVP, the uncertainty surrounding the recession at that time and the inherent risk of customer defaults. While we have since resumed the payment of dividends on our common stock, in the future, there can be no assurance that the Board of Directors will continue to declare dividends.

Cybersecurity incidentstechnology infrastructure could disrupt business operations, result in the loss of critical and confidential information, and adversely impact our reputation and operating results

We rely extensively on information technology (“IT”) networks and systems, our global data centers and services provided over the internet to process, transmit and store electronic information, and to manage or support a variety of business processes or activities across our facilities worldwide. In addition, a greater number of our employees are working remotely as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which may increase cybersecurity vulnerabilities and risk to our IT networks and systems. The secure operation of our IT networks and systems and the proper processing and maintenance of this information are critical to our business operations. We have been, and likely will continue to be, subject to cyber-attacks. To date we have seen no material impact on our business from these attacks or events. Although we seek to deploy comprehensive security measures to prevent, detect, address and mitigate these threats, there has been an increased level of activity, and an associated level of sophistication, in cyber-attacks against large multinational companies. The ever-evolving threats mean we and our third-party service providers and vendors must continually evaluate and adapt our respective systems and processes and overall security environment, as well as those of any companies we acquire. There is no guarantee that these measures will be adequate to safeguard against all data security breaches, system compromises or misuses of data.

Our security measures may be breached due to human or technological error, employee malfeasance, system malfunctions or attacks from uncoordinated individuals or sophisticated and targeted measures known as advanced persistent threats, directed at the Company, its products, its customers, and/or its third-party service providers.

providers, and/or other entities with whom we do business. Because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and generally are not recognized until they are launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. Disruptions and attacks on our IT systems or the systems of third parties storing our data or employee malfeasance or human or technological error could result in the misappropriation, loss, destruction or corruption of our critical data and confidential or proprietary information, personal information of our employees, the leakage of our or our customers’ confidential information, improper use of our systems and networks, production downtimes and both internal and external supply shortages, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. It may also result in the theft of intellectual property or other misappropriation of assets, or otherwise compromise our confidential or proprietary information and disrupt our operations. The potential consequences of a material cybersecurity incident include reputational damage, theft of intellectual property, litigation with third parties, diminution in the value of our investment in research, development and engineering, diversion of the attention of management away from the operation of our business and increased cybersecurity protection and remediation costs, legal claims and liability, regulatory scrutiny, sanctions, fines or penalties (which may not be covered by our insurance policies), negative publicity, release of sensitive and/or confidential information, increases in operating expenses, or lost revenues which in turn could adversely affect our competitiveness and results of operations. To the extent that any disruption or security breach results in a misappropriation, loss, destruction or corruption of our customer’s information, it


could affect our relationships with our customers, create significant expense for us to investigate and remediate damage, lead to claims against the Company and ultimately harm our business. In addition, we may be required to incur significant costs to protect against damage caused by these disruptions or security breaches in the future.In addition, as the regulatory environment related to information security, data collection and use, and privacy becomes increasingly rigorous, with new and constantly changing requirements applicable to our business, compliance with those requirements could result in additional costs.Any Furthermore, our technology systems are vulnerable to damage or interruption from natural disasters, power loss and telecommunication failures. We continuously seek to maintain a robust program of information security and controls, however, any future significant compromise or breach of our data security, whether external or internal, or misuse of customer, associate, supplier or Company data, could result in significant costs, lost sales, fines, lawsuits, and damage to our reputation.

Third parties that maintain certain of our confidential and proprietary information could experience a cybersecurity incident

We rely on third parties to provide or maintain some of our IT systems, data centers and related services and do not exercise direct control over these systems. Despite the implementation of security measures at third party locations, these IT systems, data centers and cloud services are also vulnerable to security breaches or other disruptions. Additionally, we and certain of our third-party vendors, collect and store personal information in connection with human resources operations and other aspects of our business. While we obtain assurances that any third parties we provide data to will protect this information and, where we believe appropriate, monitor the protections employed by these third parties, there is a risk the confidentiality of data held by us or by third parties may be compromised and expose us to liability for such breach.

Global climate change could negatively affect our business

MoreIncreased public awareness and concern regarding global climate change may results in more regional and/or national requirements to reduce or mitigate the effects of greenhouse gas emissionsemissions. In addition, our shareholders and customers may adversely impactalso expect us to reduce our business. Today there isgreenhouse gas emissions. There continues to be a lack of consistent climate legislation, which results increates economic and regulatory uncertainty. Any future regulations aimed at mitigating climate change may negatively impact the prices of raw materials and energy as well as the demand for certain of our customer’s products which could in turn impact demand for our products and impact our results of operations. The costs of compliance and any changes to our operations mandated by new or amended laws, may be significant. We may also face unexpected delays in obtaining permits and approvals required by such laws in connection with our manufacturing facilities, which would hinder our operation of these facilities. Furthermore, any violations of these laws may result in substantial fines and penalties, remediation costs, third party damages, or a suspension or cessation of our operations. The manifestations of climate change, such as extreme weather conditions or more frequent extreme weather events could disrupt our operations, damage our facilities, disrupt our supply chain, including our customers or make it hardersuppliers, impact the availability and cost of materials needed for manufacturing or moreincrease insurance and other operating costs.As a result, severe weather or a natural disaster that results in a prolonged disruption to our operations, or the operations of our customers or suppliers, could have a material adverse effect on ouroperating results, cash flows or financial condition.

18


Our goals, targets and ambitions related to sustainability and emissions reduction, and our public statements and disclosures regarding them, expose us to numerous risks

We have developed, and will continue to develop and set, goals, targets, ambitions and other objectives related to sustainability matters, including our net-zero emission targets both for ourselves and our supply chain. Statements related to these goals, targets, ambitions and objectives reflect our current plans and do not constitute a guarantee that they will be achieved. Our efforts to research, establish, accomplish, and accurately report on these goals, targets, and objectives expose us to numerous operational, reputational, financial, legal, and other risks. Additionally, greenhouse gas emissions, particular emissions that come from individuals and entities up and down the value chain (otherwise known as Scope 3 emissions), are very difficult to obtain raw materials necessary for the manufacturingestimate and our estimates may be materially different than actual emissions. The manner in which we estimate and disclose Scope 3 emissions may differ from other companies, and currently, we do not include downstream Scope 3 emissions in our targets and ambitions. Our ability to achieve any stated goal, target, ambition or objective, including with respect to emissions reduction, is subject to numerous factors and conditions, some of which are outside of our products.control. We may also have to purchase carbon offsets in order to meet our targets and objectives.

Our business may face increased scrutiny from investors and other stakeholders related to our sustainability activities, including the goals, targets, and objectives that we announce, and our methodologies and timelines for pursuing them. If our sustainability practices do not meet investor or other stakeholder expectations and standards, which continue to evolve, our reputation, our ability to attract or retain employees, and our attractiveness as an investment or business partner could be negatively affected. Similarly, our failure or perceived failure to pursue or fulfill our sustainability-focused goals, targets, ambitions and objectives, to comply with ethical, environmental, or other standards, regulations, or expectations, or to satisfy various reporting standards with respect to these matters, within the timelines we announce, or at all, could adversely affect our business or reputation, as well as expose us to government enforcement actions and private litigation.

RISKS RELATED TO INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS

Our business is exposed to risks inherent in international operations

We currently conduct operations in various countries and jurisdictions, including locating certain of our manufacturing and distribution facilities internationally, which subjects us to the legal, political, regulatory and social requirements and economic conditions in these jurisdictions. Some of these countries are considered growth markets and emerging markets. International sales and operations, especially in growth markets, subject us to certain risks inherent in doing business abroad, including:

exposure to local economic conditions;

unexpected changes in laws, regulations, trade, or monetary or fiscal policy, including interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and changes in the rate of inflation in the countries in which we do business;

rates; foreign tax consequences;

inability to collect, or delays in collecting, value-added taxes and/or other receivables associated with remittances and other payments by subsidiaries;

exposure to local political turmoil and challenging labor conditions;

changes in general economic and political conditions in countries where we operate, particularly in emerging markets; expropriation and nationalization;

enforcing legal agreements or collecting receivables through foreign legal systems;

wage inflation in growth markets;

inflation; currency controls, including lack of liquidity in foreign currency due to governmental restrictions, trade protection policies and currency controls, which may create difficulty in repatriating profits or making other remittances;

compliance with the requirements of an increasing body of applicable anti-bribery laws;

reduced intellectual property protection in various markets;

investment restrictions or requirements; and

the imposition of product tariffs and the burden of complying with a wide variety of international and U.S. export laws.

The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. The 2017 United States Tax CutOrganization for Economic Co-operation and Jobs ActDevelopment (“Tax Act”OECD”) significantly changedcontinues its base erosion and profit shifting (“BEPS”) project begun in 2015 with new proposals for a global minimum tax, further development of a coordinated set of rules for taxation and the taxationallocation of U.S. based multinational corporations.taxing rights between jurisdictions. These proposals, if adopted by countries in which we operate, could result in changes to tax policies, including transfer pricing policies, that could ultimately impact our tax liabilities. The U.S. Treasury Department, the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"),timing or impact of these proposals and state tax authorities have issued or will be issuing applicable guidance on how the provisions of the Tax Act will be applied or otherwise administered, and additional accounting guidance or interpretations may be issued in the future that are different from our current interpretation. The legislation could be subject to potential amendments and technical corrections, any of which could materially lessen or increase certain adverse impacts of the legislation. As regulations and guidance evolve with respect to the Tax Act, and as we gather information and perform more analysis, our results may differ from previous estimates and may materially affect our financial position


Additionally, changesrecommendations is unclear at this point. Changes in tax laws or policies by the U.S. or foreign jurisdictions could result in a higher effective tax rate on our worldwide earnings, and any such change could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, cash flows, operating results and financial condition.

Our international operations also depend upon favorable trade relations between the U.S. and those foreign countries in which our customers and suppliers have operations. The current U.S. presidential administration has created uncertainty about the future relationship between the U.S. and certain of its trading partners, including with respect to the trade policies and agreements, treaties, government regulations and tariffs that could apply to trade between the U.S. and other nations. These developments may have a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets, and may significantly reduce global trade and, in particular, trade between these nations and the U.S. It could also impact importing certain foreign produced vehicles into the U.S. Similarly, the political situations in certain countries, specifically Brazil, China, France, Russia, Turkey, and the United Kingdom, make it difficult to predict the near-term stability of trade costs with these nations. Changes in national policy, other governmental action related to tariffs or continued uncertaintyinternational trade agreements, changes in U.S. social, political regulatory, and economic conditions or in laws and policies governing foreign trade, manufacturing, development and investment in the territories and countries where the Company currently manufactures and sells products, and any resulting negative sentiments towards the U.S. as a result of such changes could depress economic activity and restrict our access to suppliers or customers and have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, operating results and financial condition.

Increasing our manufacturing footprint in the growth markets and our business relationships with automotive manufacturers in these markets are particularly important elements of our strategy. As a result, our exposure to the risks described above may be greater in the future, and our exposure to risks associated with developing countries, such as the risk of political upheaval and reliability of local infrastructure, may increase.

The exit of the United Kingdom from membership in the European Union may adversely affect our business and profitability

The expected exit of the United Kingdom (“U.K”) from the European Union (“EU”) (“Brexit”) could adversely affect European and worldwide economic and market conditions and contribute to instability in global financial and foreign exchange markets, including increased volatility in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. Uncertainty over the terms of the United Kingdom’s departure from the European Union, which is scheduled to occur on March 29, 2019, could cause political and economic uncertainty in the United Kingdom and the rest of Europe. Until agreements related to Brexit are in place, it is difficult to predict the impact Brexit will have on international trade, and whether we need to renegotiate any of our contractual arrangements to accommodate a new trade regime. If the U.K. leaves the EU without an agreement in place, there could be an adverse impact and volatility in foreign exchange markets and labor and trade practices and policy. We conduct business in the United Kingdom and several EU nations and the taxation policies of the U.K. and the EU nations may change as a result of Brexit, which could adversely impact our tax positions. We may be required to comply with regulatory requirements in the United Kingdom that are in addition to, or inconsistent with, the regulatory requirements of the EU.

Although we are monitoring the ongoing potential impacts of Brexit and seek to minimize its impact on our business, the effects of Brexit could adversely affect our business prospects, operating results, cash flows and financial condition.

Significant changes in the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”) could adversely affect our financial performance

In October 2018, the U.S., Mexico and Canada agreed to a trade deal that would replace NAFTA, subject to legal review and ratification by each country. The new deal, known as The United States Mexico Canada Agreement (“USMCA”), includes changes to the automotive rules of origin that dictate what percentage of an automobile must be built from parts that originated from countries in the NAFTA region. The new rules would require that at least 75% of parts be made in North America and require that 40-45% of an automobile must be made by workers earning at least $16 an hour. Reflective of the automotive industry, our vehicle parts manufacturing facilities in the U.S., Mexico and Canada are highly dependent on duty-free trade within the NAFTA region. If the USMCA is not ratified and, as a consequence, the U.S. withdraws from NAFTA, such withdrawal could have a materially adverse impact on our financial performance. The imposition of customs duties on imports into the U.S., Mexico, or Canada could negatively impact our financial performance.

Our foreign operations may subject us to risks relating to laws governing international relations

Due to our global operations, we are subject to many laws governing international relations (including, but not limited to, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and other anti-bribery regulations in foreign jurisdictions where we do business), which prohibit improper payments to government officials and restrict where and how we can do business, what information or products we can supply to certain countries and what information we can provide to authorities in governmental authorities. We also export components and products that are subject to certain trade-related U.S. laws, including the U.S. Export Administration Act and various economic sanctions programs administered by the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control.

Although we have procedures and policies in place that should mitigate the risk of violating these laws, there is no guarantee that they will be sufficiently effective. If and when we acquire new businesses, we may not be able to ensure that the pre-existing controls and procedures meant to prevent violations of these laws were effective, and violations may occur if we are unable to timely implement corrective and effective controls and procedures when integrating newly acquired businesses. Any allegations of noncompliance with these laws could harm our reputation, divert management attention and result in significant expenses, and could therefore materially harm our business prospects, operating results and financial condition.


19


Our business in ChinaAsia is subject to aggressive competition and is sensitive to economic and market conditions

We operate in the highly competitive automotive supply market throughout Asia including the highly competitive markets in China, Korea, and India. In each of these markets we face competition from both international and smaller domestic manufacturers. Due to the significance of our China marketthe Asian markets for our profit and growth, we are exposed to risks in China.China, Korea, and India. We anticipate that additional competitors, both international and domestic, may seek to enter the Chinese, marketKorean, and/or Indian markets resulting in increased competition. Increased competition may result in lower sales volumes, price reductions, reduced margins and our inability to gain or hold market share. There have been periods of increased market volatility and moderation in the levels of economic growth in China, which resulted in periods of lower automotive production growth rates in China than those previously experienced. Our business in ChinaAsia is sensitive to economic and market conditions that drive automotive sales volumes in China, Korea, and India and may be impacted if there are reductions in vehicle demand in China.those markets. If we are unable to maintain our position in the Chinese market,these Asian markets, the pace of growth slows, or vehicle sales in Chinathese markets decrease, our business prospects, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

Global integration may result in additional risks

Because of our efforts to manage costs by integrating our operations globally, we face the additional risk that, should any of the other risks discussed herein materialize, the negative effects could be more pronounced. For example, while supply delays of a component have typically only affected a few customer vehicle models, such a delay could now affect several vehicle models of several customers in several geographic areas. Similarly, any recall or warranty issue we face due to a product defect or failure is now more likely to involve a larger number of units in several geographic areas.

Exchange rate risks

As a result of our global presence, a significant portion of our revenues and expenses are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We are therefore subject to foreign currency risks and foreign exchange exposure. Such risks and exposures include:

transaction exposure, which arises because the cost of a product originates in one currency and the product is sold in another currency;

revaluation effects, which arise from valuation of assets denominated in other currencies than the reporting currency of each unit;

translation exposure in the income statement, which arises when the income statements of non-U.S. subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars;

translation exposure in the balance sheet, which arises when the balance sheets of non-U.S. subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars; and

changes in the reported U.S. dollar amounts of cash flows.

We cannot predict exchange rate volatility or the extent of its impact on our future financial results. We typically denominate foreign transactions in foreign currencies to achieve a natural hedge. However, a natural hedge cannot be achieved for all our currency flows; therefore, a net transaction exposure remains within the group. The net exposure can be significant and creates a transaction exposure risk for the Company. The Company does not hedge translation exposure. However, we do engage in foreign exchange rate hedging from time to time related to foreign currency transactions. For additional information, see Part II, Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk - Currency risks.

RISKS RELATED TO ACQUISITIONS

We face risks in connection with acquisitions and joint ventures

Our growth has been enhanced through strategic opportunities, including acquisitions of businesses, products and technologies, and joint development agreements that we believe will complement our business. We regularly evaluate acquisition opportunities, frequently engage in acquisition discussions, conduct due diligence activities in connection with possible acquisitions, and, where appropriate, engage in acquisition negotiations. We may not be able to successfully identify suitable acquisition and joint venture candidates or complete transactions on acceptable terms, integrate acquired operations into our existing operations or expand into new markets. Our failure to identify suitable strategic opportunities may restrict our ability to grow our business.

These strategic opportunities also involve numerous additional risks to us and our investors, including:

risks related to retaining acquired management and employees;

difficulties in integrating acquired technologies, products, operations, services and personnel with our existing businesses;

diversion of our management’s attention from other business concerns;

assumption of contingent liabilities;

adverse financial impacts from the amortization of expenses related to intangible assets;

adverse financial impacts from potential impairment of goodwill;


incurrence of indebtedness; and

potential adverse financial impacts.

In the future, we may pursue acquisitions of businesses or products that are complementary to our business but for which we have historically had little or no direct experience. These transactions can involve significant challenges and risks as well as significant time and resources that may divert management’s attention from other business activities. If we fail to adequately manage these risks, the acquisitions may not result in revenue growth, operational synergies or service or technology enhancements, which could adversely affect our financial condition.

20


RISKS RELATED TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

If our patents are declared invalid or our technology infringes on the proprietary rights of others, our ability to compete may be impaired

We have developed a considerable amount of proprietary technology related to automotive safety systems and rely on a number of patents to protect such technology. Our intellectual property plays an important role in maintaining our competitive position in a number of the markets we serve. At present, we hold approximately 6,050more than 6,400 patents covering a large number of innovations and product ideas, mainly in the fields of seatbelt and airbag technologies. In addition to our in-house research and development efforts, we seek to acquire rights to new intellectual property through corporate acquisitions, asset acquisitions, licensing and joint venture arrangements. Our patents and licenses expire on various dates during the period from 20192022 to 2038.2041. We do not expect the expiration of any single patent or license to have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Developments or assertions by or against us relating to intellectual property rights could negatively impact our business. We primarily protect our innovations with patents and vigorously protect and defend our patents, trademarks and know-how against infringement and unauthorized use. If we are not able to protect our intellectual property and our proprietary rights and technology, we could lose those rights and incur substantial costs policing and defending those rights. We also generate license revenue from these patents, which we may lose if we do not adequately protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights. Our means of protecting our intellectual property, proprietary rights and technology may not be adequate, and our competitors may independently develop technologies that are similar or superior to our proprietary technologies, duplicate our technologies, or design around the patents we own or license. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to as great an extent as the laws of the U.S. and we may encounter significant problems in protecting and defending our intellectual property rights in certain foreign jurisdictions. This could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents or misappropriation of our other intellectual property rights. Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business. Accordingly, our efforts to protect our intellectual property rights in such countries may be inadequate.

We may not be able to protect our proprietary technology and intellectual property rights, which could result in the loss of our rights or increased costs.

Although we believe that our products and technology do not infringe the proprietary rights of others, third parties may assert infringement claims against us in the future. Additionally, we license from third parties proprietary technology covered by patents, and we cannot be certain that any such patents will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. Such licenses may also be non-exclusive, meaning our competition may also be able to access such technology. Further, we expect to continue to expand our products and services and expand into new businesses, including through developing new products, acquisitions, joint ventures and joint development agreements, which could increase our exposure to patent and other intellectual property claims from competitors and other parties. If claims alleging patent, copyright or trademark infringement are brought against us and are successfully prosecuted against us, they could result in substantial costs. If a successful claim is made against us and we fail to develop non-infringing technology, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. In addition, certain of our products utilize components that are developed by third parties and licensed to us. If claims alleging patent, copyright or trademark infringement are brought against such licensors and successfully prosecuted, they could result in substantial costs, and we may not be able to replace the functions provided by these licensors. Alternate sources for the technology currently licensed to us may not be available in a timely manner, may not provide the same functions as currently provided or may be more expensive than products currently used.

We may develop proprietary information through our in-house research and development efforts, consulting arrangements or research collaborations with other entities or organizations. We may seek to protect this proprietary information by entering into confidentiality agreements or consulting, services or employment agreements that contain non-disclosure and non-use provisions with our employees, consultants, scientific advisors and other third parties. However, we may fail to enter into the necessary agreements, and even if entered into, these agreements may be breached or may otherwise fail to prevent disclosure, third-party infringement or misappropriation of our proprietary information.

We may not be able to respond quickly enough to changes in technology and technological risks and to develop our intellectual property into commercially viable products

Changes in legislative, regulatory or industry requirements or in competitive technologies may render certain of our products obsolete or less attractive to our customers. We currently license certain proprietary technology to third parties and, if such technology becomes obsolete or less attractive, those licensees could terminate our license agreements, which could adversely affect our results of operations. Our ability to anticipate changes in technology and regulatory standards and to successfully develop and introduce new and enhanced products on a timely basis will be a significant factor in our ability to remain competitive. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to achieve the technological advances that may be necessary for us to remain competitive or that certain of our products will not become obsolete. We are also subject to the risks generally associated with new product introductions and applications, including lack of market acceptance, delays in product development and failure of products to operate properly. As part of our business strategy, we may from time to time seek to acquire businesses or assets that provide us with additional intellectual property. We may experience problems integrating acquired technologies into our existing technologies and products, and such acquired intellectual property may be subject to known or contingent liabilities such as infringement claims.


21


Some of our products and technologies may use “open source” software, which may restrict how we use or distribute our products or require that we release the source code of certain products subject to those licenses

Some of our products and technologies may incorporate software licensed under so-called “open source” licenses. In addition to risks related to license requirements, usage of open source software can lead to greater risks than use of third-party commercial software, as open source licensors generally do not provide warranties or controls on origin of the software. Additionally, open source licenses typically require that source code subject to the license be made available to the public and that any modifications or derivative works to open source software continue to be licensed under open source licenses. These open source licenses typically mandate that proprietary software, when combined in specific ways with open source software, become subject to the open source license. If we combine our proprietary software in such ways with open source software, we could be required to release the source code of our proprietary software. We take steps to ensure that our proprietary software is not combined with, and does not incorporate, open source software in ways that would require our proprietary software to be subject to an open source license. However, few courts have interpreted open source licenses, andlicenses; therefore the manner in which these licenses may be interpreted and enforced is therefore subject to some uncertainty.

RISKS RELATED TO GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS AND TAXES

Our business may be adversely affected by laws or regulations, including environmental, occupational health and safety or other governmental regulations

We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations, including those related to the requirements of environmental, occupational health and safety, financial and other matters. We cannot predict the substance or impact of pending or future legislation or regulations, or the application thereof. The introduction of new laws or regulations or changes in existing laws or regulations, or the interpretations thereof, could increase the costs of doing business for us or our customers or suppliers or restrict our actions and adversely affect our business prospects, operating results, cash flows or financial condition. Our operations are subject to environmental and safety laws and regulations governing, among other things, emissions to air, discharges to waters and the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of waste and other materials. The operation of automotive parts manufacturing facilities entails risks in these areas, and we cannot assure that we will not incur material costs or liabilities as a result. Additionally, environmental laws, regulations, and permits and the enforcement thereof change frequently and have tended to become increasingly stringent over time, which may necessitate substantial capital expenditures or operating costs or may require changes of production processes. Although we have no known pending material environmental issues, there is no assurance that we will not be adversely impacted by any environmental costs, liabilities or claims in the future either under present laws and regulations or those that may be adopted or imposed in the future. Our costs, liabilities, and obligations relating to environmental matters may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, cash flows, or financial condition.

Our facilities in the U.S. are subject to regulation by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”), which regulates the protection of the health and safety of workers. In addition, the OSHA hazard communication standard requires that we maintain information about hazardous materials used or produced in our operations and that we provide this information to employees, state and local governmental authorities and local residents. We are also subject to occupational safety regulations in other countries. Our failure to comply with government occupational safety regulations, including OSHA requirements, or general industry standards relating to employee health and safety, keep adequate records or monitor occupational exposure to regulated substances could expose us to liability, enforcement, and fines and penalties, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, cash flows, or financial condition.

Although we employ safety procedures in the design and operation of our facilities, there is a risk that an accident or injury to one of our employees could occur in one of our facilities. Any accident or injury to our employees could result in litigation, manufacturing delays and harm to our reputation, which could negatively affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

22


Our business may be adversely affected by changes in automotive safety regulations or concerns that drive further regulation of the automobile safety market

Government vehicle safety regulations are a key driver in our business. Historically, these regulations have imposed ever more stringent safety regulations for vehicles. Safety regulations have a positive impact on driver awareness and acceptance of automotive safety products and technology. These more stringent safety regulations often require vehicles to have more safety content per vehicle and more advanced safety products, which has thus been a driver of growth in our business.

However, these regulations are subject to change based on a number of factors that are not within our control, including new scientific or medical data, adverse publicity regarding the industry recalls and safety risks of airbags or seatbelts (for instance, to children and small adults), domestic and foreign political developments or considerations, and litigation relating to our products and our competitors’ products. Changes in government regulations in response to these and other considerations could have a severe impact on our business. Although we believe that over time safety will continue to be a regulatory priority, if government priorities shift and we are unable to adapt to changing regulations, our business may suffer material adverse effects.

The regulatory obligation of complying with safety regulations could increase as federal and local regulators impose more stringent compliance and reporting requirements in response to product recalls and safety issues in our industry. We are subject to existing stringent requirements under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966 (the “Vehicle Safety Act”), including a duty to report, subject to strict timing requirements, safety defects with our products. The Vehicle Safety Act imposes potentially significant civil penalties for violations including the failure to comply with such reporting actions. We are also subject to the existing U.S. Transportation Recall Enhancement, Accountability and Documentation (TREAD) Act, which requires equipment manufacturers, such as Autoliv, to comply with “Early Warning” requirements by reporting certain information to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”) such as: information related to defects or reports of injury related to our products. TREAD imposes criminal liability for violating such requirements if a defect subsequently causes death or bodily injury. In addition, the Vehicle Safety Act authorizes NHTSA to require a manufacturer to recall and repair vehicles that contain safety defects or fail to comply with U.S. federal motor vehicle safety standards. Sales into foreign countries may be subject to similar regulations.


Due to the recent record recall of airbag inflators of one of our competitors, additional legislation has been proposed in the U.S. Congress regarding the reporting requirements for product recalls. NHTSA has also become more active in requesting information from suppliers and vehicle manufactures regarding potential product defects. For example, in connection withdefects and we expect that to continue or increase under the Toyota Recall, we, in connection with Toyota, have informed NHTSA of the reported incidents and Toyota has discussed with NHTSA what action it will take to address the issue.new U.S. presidential administration.

Negative or unexpected tax developments could adversely affect our effective tax rate, operating results and financial condition

Changes in, or changes in the application of, U.S. or foreign tax laws, regulations or accounting principles with respect to matters such as tax base, tax rates, transfer pricing, dividends and restrictions on certain forms of tax relief or limitations on favorable tax treatment could affect the carrying value of our deferred tax assets and/or our effective tax rate. Our annual tax rate is based on our income and the tax laws in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Because of our global operations we face uncertainties and judgments in the application of complex tax regulations in a multitude of jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our effective tax rate and in evaluating our tax positions. Although we believe that our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of our tax liability may be different from what is reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals.

We are regularly examined by tax authorities around the world and in a number of jurisdictions, we are currently under examination, in a number of jurisdictions, which are inherently uncertain.creates uncertainty. Although we periodically assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes, negative or unexpected results from one or more of such reviews and audits, including any related interest or penalties imposed by governmental authorities, could increase our effective tax rate and adversely impact our operating results, cash flows or financial condition.

The effective tax rates used for interim reporting are based on our projected full-year geographic earnings mix and consideration of our cash repatriation plans.take into account projected tax costs on intercompany dividends from lower tier subsidiaries. Changes in currency exchange rates, earnings mix byamong taxing jurisdictionjurisdictions, or in cash repatriation plansthe ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends could impact our reported effective tax rates, or cause fluctuations in the tax rate from quarter to quarter. AnyCertain anti-trust judgements or settlements may not be tax deductible, which could have a material negative impact to our annual tax rate. A number of other factors may also increase our effective tax rate, which could have an adverse impact on our profitability and operating results. Due to our numerous foreign operations, our tax rate may be impacted by our global mix of earnings if our pre-tax income is lower than anticipated in countries with lower statutory tax rates and/or is higher than anticipated in countries with higher statutory tax rates. Based on U.S. regulatory rules, we do not record current or deferred tax liabilities on permanent investments in our foreign subsidiaries and our foreign earnings that are indefinitely reinvested. However, if our non-U.S. subsidiaries were to distribute cash to our U.S. parent or make a cash outlay, such transactions may result in an increase to our effective tax rate. However, based on the Tax Act, a substantial liability for U.S. federal income taxes with respect to our non-U.S. earnings has been recorded.subsidiaries. See Note 65 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report.

Changes in, or changes in the application of, U.S. or foreign tax laws, regulations or accounting principles with respect to matters such as tax rates, transfer pricing, dividends and restrictions on certain forms of tax relief or limitations on favorable tax treatment could affect the carrying value of our deferred tax assets and/or our effective tax rate.

We may not be able to fully realize our deferred tax assets

We currently carry deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances, resulting from deductible temporary differences and tax loss carry-forwards, both of which will reduce taxable income in the future. However, deferred tax assets may only be realized against taxable income. The amount of our deferred tax assets could be reduced, from time to time, due to adverse changes in our operations or in estimates of future taxable income from operations during the carry-forward period as a result of a deterioration in market conditions or other circumstances. Any such reduction would adversely affect our income in the period of the adjustment. Additional information on our deferred tax assets is included in Note 65 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report.

23


RISKS RELATED TO THE SEPARATION OF VEONEER

We may not achieve some or all of the expected benefits of the separation

Although we believe that the separation of Veoneer has provided financial, operational, managerial and other benefits to us and our stockholders, it may not provide results on the scope or scale we anticipated, or such benefits may be delayed or not occur at all. Following the completion of the spin-off, Autoliv is a smaller, less diversified company with a narrower business focus and may be more vulnerable to changing market conditions, which could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

We could incur significant liability if the separation is determined to be a taxable transaction

We have received an opinion of outside counsel to the effect that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the separation should qualify, for both Autoliv and its stockholders, as a reorganization within the meaning of Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The opinion is based on and relies on, among other things, certain facts and assumptions, as well as certain representations, statements and undertakings of Autoliv and Veoneer, including those relating to the past and future conduct of Autoliv and Veoneer. If any of these facts, assumptions, representations, statements or undertakings is, or becomes, inaccurate or incomplete, reliance on the opinion may be affected. An opinion of outside counsel represents their legal judgment but is not binding on the IRS or any court. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the conclusions reflected in the opinion or that a court would not sustain such a challenge.


Potential indemnification obligations to Veoneer or a refusal of Veoneer to indemnify us pursuant to the agreements executed in connection with the internal reorganization and spin-off could materially adversely affect us

The transaction agreements we entered into with Veoneer in connection with the internal reorganization and the spin-off provide for cross-indemnities that require Autoliv and Veoneer to bear financial responsibility for each company’s business prior to the internal reorganization or spin-off, as applicable, and to indemnify the other party in connection with a breach of such party of the transaction agreements; provided, however, certain warranty, recall and product liabilities for electronics products manufactured prior to the completion of the internal reorganization have been retained by us and we will indemnify Veoneer for any losses associated with such warranty, recall or product liabilities pursuant to the distribution agreement entered into as part of the spin-off. Any indemnities that we are required to provide to Veoneer may be significant and could negatively affect our business. In addition, there can be no assurance that the indemnities from Veoneer will be sufficient to protect us against the full amount of any potential liabilities. Even if we do succeed in recovering from Veoneer any amounts for which we are held liable, we may be temporarily required to bear these losses ourselves. In addition, eachAdditionally, Veoneer has announced that it entered into a definitive agreement to be acquired by Qualcomm Incorporated and SSW Partners. If such transaction is completed, our ability to recover any amounts from Veoneer pursuant to the transaction agreements may be impacted. Each of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

24


Item 2. Properties

Autoliv’s principal executive offices are located at Klarabergsviadukten 70, Section B7, SE-111 64, Stockholm, Sweden. Autoliv’s various businesses operate in a number of production facilities and offices. Autoliv believes that its properties are adequately maintained and suitable for their intended use and that the Company’s production facilities have adequate capacity for the Company’s current and foreseeable needs. All of Autoliv’s production facilities and offices are owned or leased by operating (either subsidiary or joint venture) companies.


AUTOLIV MANUFACTURING FACILITIES

Country/ Company

Location of Facility

Items Produced at Facility

Owned/ LeasedAUTOLIV MANUFACTURING FACILITIES

BrazilCountry/Company

Location of Facility

Items produced at Facility

Owned/Leased

Brazil

Autoliv do Brasil Ltda.

Taubaté

Seatbelts, airbags, steering wheels and seatbelt webbing

Owned

Canada

Autoliv Canada, Inc.

Tilbury

Airbag cushions

Airbag cushions

Owned

VOA Canada, Inc.

Collingwood

Seatbelt webbing

Seatbelt webbing

Owned

China

Autoliv (Baoding) Vehicle Safety Systems Co., Ltd

Baoding

Airbags

Airbags

Leased

Autoliv (Changchun) Vehicle Safety Systems Co., Ltd.

Changchun

Airbags and seatbelts

Owned

Autoliv (China) Steering Wheel Co., Ltd.

Fengxian/Shanghai

Steering wheels

Steering wheels

Owned

Autoliv (Guangzhou) Vehicle Safety Systems Co., Ltd.

Guangzhou

Airbags and seatbelts

Owned

Autoliv (Nanjing) Vehicle Safety Systems Co., Ltd.

Nanjing

Seatbelts

Seatbelts

Owned

Autoliv Shenda (Nanjing) Automotive Components Co., Ltd.

Nanjing

Seatbelt webbing

Seatbelt webbing

Owned

Autoliv (Shanghai) Vehicle Safety Systems Co., Ltd.

Shanghai

Airbags

Airbags

Owned

Autoliv Shenda (Tai Cang) Automotive Safety Systems Co., Ltd.

Shanghai

Seatbelt webbing

Seatbelt webbing

Owned

Autoliv (Jiangsu) Automotive Safety Components Co., Ltd.

Jintan

Propellant, Airbag initiators and Airbag inflators

Owned

Autoliv (China) Automotive Safety Systems Co., Ltd.

Nantong

Airbag cushions

Airbag cushions

Owned

Mei-An Autoliv Co., Ltd.

Taipei

Seatbelts and airbags

Leased

Estonia

AS Norma

Tallinn

Seatbelts and belt components

Owned

France

Autoliv France SNC

Gournay-en-Bray

Airbags

Seatbelts and airbags

Owned

Autoliv Isodelta SAS

Chiré-en-Montreuil

Steering wheels and covers

Owned

Livbag SAS

Pont-de-Buis

Airbag inflators

Airbag inflators

Owned

N.C.S. Pyrotechnie et Technologies SAS

Survilliers

Airbag initiators and seatbelt micro gas generators

Owned

Germany

Autoliv B.V. & Co. KG

Dachau

Elmshorn

Seatbelts

Airbags

Seatbelts

Leased

Owned

Hungary

Autoliv Kft.

Sopronkövesd

Seatbelts

Seatbelts

Owned

India

Autoliv India Private Ltd.

Bangalore

Seatbelts, airbags

Owned

Mysore

Seatbelt webbing and Airbag Cushions

Owned

Delhi

Airbags and steering wheels

Leased

Indonesia

P.T. Autoliv Indonesia

Jakarta

Seatbelts and steering wheels

Owned

Japan

Autoliv Japan Ltd.

Atsugi

Steering wheels

Owned

Hiroshima

Airbags and steering wheels

Owned

Taketoyo

Airbag inflators

Owned

Tsukuba

Airbags and seatbelts

Owned

Malaysia

Autoliv-Hirotako Sdn Bhd

Kuala Lumpur

Seatbelts, airbags and steering wheels

LeasedOwned

Mysore

Seatbelt webbing

25


Mexico

Owned

Delhi

Seatbelts, airbags and steering wheels

Leased

Chennai

Airbags, Seatbelts

Leased

Indonesia

P.T. Autoliv Indonesia

Jakarta

Seatbelts and steering wheels

Owned

Japan

Autoliv Japan Ltd.

Atsugi

Steering wheels

Owned

Hiroshima

Taketoyo

Tsukuba

Airbags and steering wheels

Airbag inflators

Airbags and seatbelts

Owned

Owned

Owned

Malaysia

Autoliv-Hirotako Sdn Bhd

Kuala Lumpur

Seatbelts, airbags and steering wheels

Owned

Mexico


Country/ Company

Location of Facility

Items Produced at Facility

Owned/ Leased

Autoliv Mexico East S.A. de C.V.

Matamoros

Steering wheels

Steering wheels

Owned

Autoliv Mexico S.A. de C.V.

Lerma

Seatbelts

Seatbelts

Owned

Autoliv Safety Technology de

Tijuana

Seatbelts

Leased

Mexico S.A. de C.V.

TijuanaQuerétaro

Airbag cushions

Seatbelts

Leased

Autoliv Steering Wheels Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.

Querétaro

Querétaro

Airbags

Airbag cushions

Airbags

Leased

Leased

Philippines

Autoliv Cebu Safety Manufacturing, Inc.

Cebu

Steering wheels

Steering wheels

Owned

Poland

Autoliv Poland Sp. zo.o.

Olawa

Airbag cushions

Airbag cushions

Owned

Jelcz-Laskowice

Airbags and seatbelts

Owned

Romania

Autoliv Romania S.R.L.

Brasov

Lugoj

Seatbelts, seatbelt webbing, airbags, airbag inflators springs for retractors and seatbelt components

Airbag cushions

Owned

Owned

ResitaLugoj

Airbag cushions

Airbag cushions

LeasedOwned

Sfantu GeorgheResita

Airbag cushions

Steering wheels

Owned

OnestiSfantu Georghe

Steering wheels

Steering wheels

LeasedOwned

Russia

Onesti

Steering wheels

Leased

OOO Autoliv

TogliattiRovinari

Seatbelts

Owned

Russia

OOO Autoliv

Togliatti

Airbags, seatbelts and steering wheels

Leased

South Africa

Autoliv Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd.

Krügersdorp

Seatbelts and airbags

Owned

South Korea

Autoliv Corporation

Hwasung

Wonju

Airbags

Airbags

Seatbelts

Owned

Owned

Wonju

Seatbelts

Owned

Spain

Autoliv BKI S.A.U.Spain

Valencia

Airbags

Owned

Autoliv BKI S.A.U.

Valencia

Airbags

Owned

Sweden

Autoliv Sverige ABSweden

Vårgårda

Airbag inflators

Owned

Autoliv Sverige AB

Vårgårda

Airbag inflators

Owned

Thailand

Autoliv Thailand Ltd.

Chonburi

Chonburi

Seatbelts

Airbags, airbag cushions, steering wheels

Owned

Leased

Autoliv Thailand Ltd.

Chonburi

Seatbelts, Airbags and Steering wheels

Owned

Tunisia

Chonburi

Seatbelt components

Leased

SWT1 SARL

ASW3 SARL

El Fahs

Nadhour

Tunisia

SWT1 SARL

El Fahs

Leather wrapping of steering wheels

Owned & Leased

ASW3 SARL

Nadhour

PU Molding andLeatherand Leather wrapping of steering wheels

Owned & Leased Owned

Turkey

Autoliv Cankor Otomotiv Emniyet Sistemleri Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S.

Gebze-Kocaeli

Seatbelts

Airbags and seatbelts

Owned

Autoliv Cankor Otomotiv Emniyet Sistemleri Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. Gebze-Subesi

Gebze-Kocaeli

Airbags, Steering wheels and Seatbelt components

Leased

Autoliv Teknoloji Urunleri Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd. Sti.

Gebze-Kocaeli

Steering wheels

Leased

United Kingdom

Autoliv Metal Pres Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.Airbags International Ltd

Gebze-KocaeliCongleton

Airbag cushions

Seatbelt components

Owned

USA

United KingdomAutoliv ASP, Inc.

Brigham City

Airbag inflators

Owned

Airbags International Ltd

CongletonOgden

Airbags

Airbag cushions

Owned

Ogden

��

USA

Autoliv ASP, Inc.

Brigham City

Ogden

Ogden

Promontory

Tremonton

Airbag inflators

Airbags

Airbags and service parts

Leased

Promontory

Propellant

Owned

Tremonton

Airbag initiators and seatbelt micro gas generators

Owned

26


Owned

Leased

Owned

OwnedAUTOLIV TECHNICAL CENTERS AND CRASH TEST TRACKS


TECHNICAL CENTERS AND CRASH TEST TRACKS

Country / Company

Location

Product(s) Supported

Country/Company

Location

Product(s) supported

China

Autoliv (Shanghai) Vehicle Safety System Technical Center Co., Ltd.

Shanghai

AirbagsInflators and seatbeltspyrotechnics customer applications, and platform development with full-scale test laboratory

France

Autoliv France SNC

Gournay-en-Bray

Airbags and seatbelts customer applications and platform development with full-scale test laboratory

Livbag SAS

Pont-de-Buis

Inflator and pyrotechnic development

Germany

Autoliv B.V. & Co. KG

Dachau

Customer applications and platform development, airbags, with full-scale test laboratory

Elmshorn

Seatbelts with full-scale test laboratory

India

Autoliv India Private Ltd.

Bangalore

Airbags and seatbelts with sled testing

Japan

Autoliv Japan Ltd.

Tsukuba

Airbags and seatbelts customer applications and platform development with sled test laboratory

Poland

Autoliv Poland Sp.z.o.o.

Olawa

Airbags applications and platform development

Romania

Autoliv Romania S.R.L.

Brasov

Seatbelts with sled test laboratory

South Korea

Autoliv Corporation

Seoul

Airbags and seatbelts customer applications and platform development with sled test laboratory

Sweden

Autoliv Development AB

Vårgårda

Research center

Autoliv Sverige AB

Vårgårda

Airbags customer applications and platform development with full-scale test laboratory

USA

Autoliv ASP Inc.

Auburn Hills

Airbags, steering wheels and seatbelts customer applications and platform development with full-scale test laboratory

Ogden

France

Autoliv France SNC

Gournay-en-Bray

Airbags and seatbelts customer applications and platform development with full-scale test laboratory

Livbag SAS

Pont-de-Buis

Inflator and pyrotechnic development

Autoliv Isodelta SAS

Chiré-de-Montreuil

Steering wheels development and customer applications

Germany

Autoliv B.V. & Co. KG

Dachau

Customer applications and platform development, airbags with full-scale test laboratory

Elmshorn

Seatbelts with full-scale test laboratory

India

Autoliv India Private Ltd.

Bangalore

Airbags and seatbelts with sled testing

Japan

Autoliv Japan Ltd.

Tsukuba

Airbags and seatbelts customer applications and platform development with sled test laboratory

Poland

Autoliv Poland Sp. zo.o.

Jelcz

Airbags applications and platform development

Romania

Autoliv Romania S.R.L.

Brasov

Seatbelts with sled test laboratory

South Korea

Autoliv Corporation

Seoul

Airbags and seatbelts customer applications and platform development with sled test laboratory

Sweden

Autoliv Development AB

Vårgårda

Research center

Autoliv Sverige AB

Vårgårda

Airbags customer applications, inflator and special safety products development with full-scale test laboratory

��

USA

Autoliv ASP, Inc.

Auburn Hills

Airbags, steering wheels, and seatbelts customer applications and platform development with sled test laboratory

Ogden

Airbags, inflators and pyrotechnics customer applications and platform development

27


In the ordinary course of ourits business, we arethe Company is subject to legal proceedings brought by or against usthe Company and ourits subsidiaries.

See Note 1817 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report for a summary of certain ongoing legal proceedings. Such information is incorporated into this Part I, Item 3 – “Legal Proceedings” by reference.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

28



PART II

PARTII

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s CommonCommon Equity, RelatedRelated Stockholder Matters and Issuer PurchasesIssuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Shareholder Informationinformation

The primary exchange market for Autoliv’s securities is the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) where Autoliv’s common stock trades under the symbol “ALV”. Autoliv’s Swedish Depositary Receipts (SDRs) are traded on NASDAQ Stockholm’s list for large market cap companies under the symbol “ALIV SDB”. Options in SDRs trade on Nasdaq Stockholm under the name “Autoliv SDB”. Options in Autoliv shares are traded on NASDAQ OMX PHLX and on NYSE Amex Options under the symbol “ALV”.

Share price performance*information*

img32403614_0.jpg 

img32403614_1.jpg 

* For all periods before the distribution date of Veoneer on June 29, 2018, the Autoliv share prices are adjusted by a factor of 72.04%.

29



Number of shares

During 2018,2021, the weighted average number of shares outstanding increased by 0.1 million to 87.1 million (excluding dilution and treasury shares). The increased to 87.5 million from 87.3 million in 2020. Assuming dilution, the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the full year 2018, assuming dilution, was reduced2021 increased to 87.387.7 from 87.787.5 million in 2017.2020.

Stock options (if exercised) and granted Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) and Performance Shares (PSs) could increase the number of shares outstanding by 0.4 million shares in total.the aggregate. Combined, this would add 0.5% to the Autolivnumber of shares outstanding. In November 2021, the Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program that authorizes the Company to repurchase up to $1.5 billion or up to 17 million shares (whichever comes first) between January 2022 and the end of 2024. On December 31, 2018, 3.0 million shares were available for repurchase under the current Board authorization from 2014. On December 31, 2018,2021, the Company had 15.715.3 million treasury shares.

Shareholders

Number

As of shareholders

Autoliv estimates that there were approximately 70,000 beneficial Autoliv owners asthe end of December 31, 2018. Close to 21%2021 around 23% of Autoliv’s securities were held by U.S.-based shareholders and around 60% by Sweden-based shareholders. Most of the remaining Autoliv securities were held in the U.K., other Nordic countries, Central Europe, JapanSwitzerland, Norway, France and Canada.Germany.

Dividends

Dividends

If declared by the BoardAutoliv has a history of Directors,paying quarterly dividends are usually paid on the first Thursday in the last month of each quarter.cash dividends. Declared dividends are announced in press releases and published on Autoliv’s corporate website. Autoliv hasOn April 2, 2020, the Board of Directors suspended the Company's quarterly dividend after determining that a historysuspension was necessary considering the evolving global COVID-19 pandemic, decline in global LVP, the uncertainty surrounding the recession at that time and the inherent risk of payingcustomer defaults. In the second quarter of 2021 the Board of Directors reinstated quarterly cashdividends. The Board of Directors revisits dividends and intends to pay similaron a quarterly basis. There can be no assurance that the Board of Directors will declare dividends in the future but may not because of certain factors as set forth in Risk Factors – “You should not anticipate or expect the payment of cash dividends on our common stock” in Item 1A of this Annual Report.

future. See Autoliv’s corporate website for additional details regarding historical dividends.

Stock incentive plan

Autoliv employees participate in the Autoliv, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Stock Incentive Plan”) and receive Autoliv stock-based awards from time to time. In connection with the spin-off, each outstanding Autoliv stock-based award as of June 29, 2018 was converted to stock awards that have underlying shares of both Autoliv and Veoneer common shares (see Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report). Additional information regarding the securities authorized for issuance under the Stock Incentive Plan is included in Item 12 of this Annual Report.

Autoliv has adopted a Stock Ownership Policy for Executives requiring the Company’s CEOChief Executive Officer (CEO) to accumulate and hold the number of Autoliv shares having a value of twice his annual base salary. For other executives, the minimum requirement is, over time, a holding equal to each executive’s annual base salary.

StockStock repurchase program

Autoliv initiated its repurchase program in 2000 with 10 million shares and has subsequently increased the total authorization four times between 2000 and 2014 to 47.5 million shares.

Such purchases may be made from time to time on the open market or otherwise at the discretion of management. There is no expiration date for the share repurchase authorization to provide management flexibility in the Company’s repurchases.

In total, Autoliv repurchased 44.5 million shares between May 2000 andOn December 31, 2017 for cash of $2,498 million, including commissions. No repurchases were made during 2018. Autoliv has made no share repurchases since June 30, 2017. The maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under2021, the stock repurchase program amounted to 2,986,288 shares at December 31, 2018.

Ofauthorized by the total numberBoard of repurchased shares, 23.6Directors in 2014 expired with approximately 3 million shares were utilized forremaining. In November 2021, the equity units offering during 2009-2012. In addition, approximately 5.3Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program that authorizes the Company to repurchase up to $1.5 billion or up to 17 million shares have been utilized by(whichever comes first) between January 2022 and the Stock Incentive Plan. At December 31, 2018, 15.7 millionend of the repurchased shares remain in treasury stock.


2024.

30


Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Selected financial data for the last five fiscal years ended December 31 for the Continuing Operations, unless noted, is summarized in the table below.

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

20141)

 

 

Sales and Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

8,678

 

 

$

8,137

 

 

$

7,922

 

 

$

7,636

 

 

$

9,240

 

 

Operating income4)

 

 

686

 

 

 

860

 

 

 

831

 

 

 

708

 

 

 

723

 

 

Income before income taxes4)

 

 

612

 

 

 

792

 

 

 

784

 

 

 

655

 

 

 

667

 

 

Net income attributable to controlling interest4)

 

 

376

 

 

 

586

 

 

 

558

 

 

 

443

 

 

 

468

 

 

Financial Position

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets excluding cash

 

 

2,670

 

 

 

2,598

 

 

 

2,269

 

 

 

2,259

 

 

 

2,607

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

1,690

 

 

 

1,609

 

 

 

1,329

 

 

 

1,265

 

 

 

1,390

 

 

Intangible assets (primarily goodwill)

 

 

1,423

 

 

 

1,440

 

 

 

1,430

 

 

 

1,445

 

 

 

1,661

 

 

Non-interest bearing liabilities

 

 

2,595

 

 

 

2,418

 

 

 

2,154

 

 

 

2,049

 

 

 

2,400

 

 

Capital employed5)

 

 

3,516

 

 

 

4,538

 

 

 

4,225

 

 

 

3,670

 

 

 

3,504

 

 

Net debt6, 8)

 

 

1,619

 

 

 

368

 

 

 

299

 

 

 

202

 

 

 

62

 

 

Total equity5)

 

 

1,897

 

 

 

4,169

 

 

 

3,926

 

 

 

3,468

 

 

 

3,442

 

 

Total assets

 

 

6,722

 

 

 

6,947

 

 

 

6,565

 

 

 

6,518

 

 

 

7,443

 

 

Long-term debt6)

 

 

1,609

 

 

 

1,311

 

 

 

1,313

 

 

 

1,499

 

 

 

1,521

 

 

Share data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share (US$) – basic4)

 

 

4.32

 

 

 

6.70

 

 

 

6.33

 

 

 

5.03

 

 

 

5.08

 

 

Earnings per share (US$) – assuming dilution4)

 

 

4.31

 

 

 

6.68

 

 

 

6.32

 

 

 

5.02

 

 

 

5.06

 

 

Total parent shareholders’ equity per share (US$)5)

 

 

21.63

 

 

 

46.38

 

 

 

41.69

 

 

 

39.22

 

 

 

38.64

 

 

Cash dividends paid per share (US$)

 

 

2.46

 

 

 

2.38

 

 

 

2.30

 

 

 

2.22

 

 

 

2.12

 

 

Cash dividends declared per share (US$)

 

 

2.48

 

 

 

2.40

 

 

 

2.32

 

 

 

2.24

 

 

 

2.14

 

 

Share repurchases

 

 

 

 

 

157

 

 

 

 

 

 

104

 

 

 

616

 

 

Number of shares outstanding (million)2)

 

 

87.1

 

 

 

87.0

 

 

 

88.2

 

 

 

88.1

 

 

 

88.7

 

 

Ratios

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross margin (%)

 

 

19.7

 

 

 

20.6

 

 

 

20.6

 

 

 

20.5

 

 

 

19.5

 

 

Operating margin (%)4)

 

 

7.9

 

 

 

10.6

 

 

 

10.5

 

 

 

9.3

 

 

 

7.8

 

 

Pretax margin (%)4)

 

 

7.1

 

 

 

9.7

 

 

 

9.9

 

 

 

8.6

 

 

 

7.2

 

 

Return on capital employed (%)7)

 

 

17

 

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

 

 

21

 

 

Return on total equity (%)4, 7)

 

 

13

 

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

 

 

12

 

 

Total equity ratio (%)5)

 

 

28

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

46

 

 

Net debt to capitalization (%)5, 6)

 

 

46

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

2

 

 

Days receivables outstanding

 

 

71

 

 

 

76

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

71

 

 

Days inventory outstanding

 

 

35

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

32

 

 

Other data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Airbag sales3)

 

 

5,699

 

 

 

5,342

 

 

 

5,256

 

 

 

5,036

 

 

 

5,019

 

 

Seatbelt sales

 

 

2,980

 

 

 

2,794

 

 

 

2,665

 

 

 

2,599

 

 

 

2,800

 

 

Capital expenditures, net

 

 

486

 

 

 

464

 

 

 

398

 

 

 

397

 

 

 

453

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities1)

 

 

591

 

 

 

936

 

 

 

868

 

 

 

751

 

 

 

713

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities1)

 

 

(628

)

 

 

(697

)

 

 

(726

)

 

 

(591

)

 

 

(453

)

 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities1)

 

 

(245

)

 

 

(566

)

 

 

(200

)

 

 

(319

)

 

 

226

 

 

Number of employees, December 31

 

 

57,700

 

 

 

56,700

 

 

 

55,800

 

 

 

51,300

 

 

 

50,800

 

 

1)

Including Discontinued Operations. This period has not been restated to reflect just continuing operations because it was not practicable to do so.

2)

At year end, excluding dilution and net of treasury shares.

3)

Including steering wheels, inflators and initiators.

4)

Including antitrust provision expense of $210 million.

5)

Impacted by the distribution of Veoneer on June 29, 2018 of approximately $2 billion recorded as a reduction of equity.

6)

The increase in debt is primarily driven by our capitalization of Veoneer of approximately $1 billion prior to the distribution to the shareholders.

7)

The Company has decided not to recalculate prior periods since the distribution of Veoneer had a significant impact on total equity and capital employed making the comparison less meaningful.

8)

See section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures in item 7.


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Important Trends

The discussions and analysis in this section isare focused on our continuing operations. For more information on our discontinuedthe Company’s results of operations see Note 3for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the Consolidatedyear ended December 31, 2020. Discussions of the Company's results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the year ended December 31, 2019 can be found in Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial StatementsCondition and Results of Operations in this Annual Report.the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, which was filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on February 21, 2021.

Autoliv, Inc. (the “Company”) provides automotive safety systems to the automotive industry with a broad range of product offerings, primarily passive safety systems. In the three-year periodyear ended December 31, 2018,2021, a number of factors have influenced the Company’s results of operations. The most notable factors have been:

Growth inCOVID-19 pandemic

Industry supply chain challenges and availability of semi-conductors limiting the light vehicle production and safety("LVP") recovery
Raw material price increases
Continued growth above LVP driven by higher content per vehicle

Continued and execution of strong order intake

book

Operational initiatives

High order intake share maintained

Strategic and structural initiatives

Continued focus on operational excellence and quality

Changes in competitive environment

 

20181)

 

 

20171)

 

 

 

20161)

 

YEARS ENDED DEC. 31 (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT EPS)

Reported

 

 

change

 

 

Reported

 

 

change

 

 

 

Reported

 

 

change

 

Global light vehicle production (in thousands)

 

91,344

 

 

 

(1

)

%

 

92,128

 

 

 

2

 

%

 

 

90,056

 

 

5

%

Consolidated net sales

$

8,678

 

 

 

7

 

%

$

8,137

 

 

 

3

 

%

 

$

7,922

 

 

4

%

Operating income3)

 

686

 

 

 

(20

)

%

 

860

 

 

 

3

 

%

 

 

831

 

 

17

%

Operating margin, %3)

 

7.9

 

 

 

(2.7

)

pp

 

10.6

 

 

 

0.1

 

pp

 

 

10.5

 

 

1.2

pp

Net income attributable to controlling interest from Continuing

   Operations3)

 

376

 

 

 

(36

)

%

 

586

 

 

 

5

 

%

 

 

558

 

 

26

%

Earnings per share Continuing Operations2, 3)

 

4.31

 

 

 

(35

)

%

 

6.68

 

 

 

6

 

%

 

 

6.32

 

 

26

%

Net cash provided by operating activities4)

 

591

 

 

 

(37

)

%

 

936

 

 

 

8

 

%

 

 

868

 

 

16

%

Return on capital employed, %5)

 

16.8

 

 

n/a

 

pp

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

pp

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

pp

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

YEARS ENDED DEC. 31 (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT EPS)

Reported1)

 

 

change

 

 

Reported1)

 

 

change

 

 

Global light vehicle production (in thousands)

 

73,425

 

 

 

3

 

%

 

71,538

 

 

 

(17

)

%

Consolidated net sales

$

8,230

 

 

 

11

 

%

$

7,447

 

 

 

(13

)

%

Operating income

 

675

 

 

 

77

 

%

 

382

 

 

 

(47

)

%

Operating margin, %

 

8.2

 

 

 

3.1

 

pp

 

5.1

 

 

 

(3.4

)

pp

Net income attributable to controlling interest

 

435

 

 

 

133

 

%

 

187

 

 

 

(60

)

%

Earnings per share2)

 

4.96

 

 

 

132

 

%

 

2.14

 

 

 

(60

)

%

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

754

 

 

 

(11

)

%

 

849

 

 

 

32

 

%

Return on capital employed, %

 

18.3

 

 

 

7.9

 

pp

 

10.4

 

 

 

(9.3

)

pp

1)

Reported figures impacted by costs for capacity alignments and antitrust related matters in 2016-2018, and by separation costs in 2018. See section Items affecting comparability and Notes 12 and 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

2)

Assuming dilution and net of treasury shares.

3)

Including antitrust provision expense of $210 million.

4)

Including Discontinued Operations

5)

The Company has decided not to recalculate prior periods since the distribution of Veoneer had a significant impact on capital employed making the comparison less meaningful.

1) Reported figures impacted by costs for capacity alignments and antitrust related matters. See section Items affecting comparability and Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

2) Assuming dilution and net of treasury shares.

COVID-19 PANDEMIC

The COVID-19 pandemic continued to impact the Company's business in 2021 mainly indirectly through the global semiconductor shortage and other industry supply chain disruptions which both limited the LVP by the Company's customers and resulted in significantly increased raw material prices. Supply chain disruptions also lead to lower customer demand visibility and material changes to call-offs with short notice which negatively impacted production efficiency and profitability in the year, although the situation stabilized somewhat in the latter part of the year. Rising raw material costs amounted to around 1.3pp in operating margin headwind in 2021, of which a small part was offset by commercial customer recoveries.

Direct COVID-19 related costs, such as personal protective equipment, quarantine costs, premium freight and other items, were around $14 million in 2021 ($20 million in 2020). Governmental support in connection with furloughing, short-term work weeks, and other similar activities was around $2 million in 2021 ($37 million in 2020).

In response to the ongoing challenging market conditions, Autoliv management continued to implement strict cost control measures in 2021. This includes footprint and capacity alignment in Europe, as well as moving overhead functions to Best Cost Countries in Americas. The Company has initiated further footprint adjustments in Japan and in the Rest of Asia. By December 31, 2021, total headcount was reduced by 11% compared to December 31, 2020. The situation is monitored closely, and further actions are being evaluated.

The Company expects the current industry-wide semiconductor supply shortage to be a limiting factor for the LVP recovery in 2022. Rising raw material costs are expected to amount to around 3pp in operating margin headwind in full year 2022, with around 5pp year over year impact in the first half and around 1-2pp in the second half. Customer recoveries are expected to offset some of these expected raw material cost increases, mainly in the second half of the year.

31


GROWTH INIMPACTED BY LIGHT VEHICLE PRODUCTION, AND SAFETY CONTENT PER VEHICLE AND STRONG ORDER BOOK

The most important driver for Autoliv’s sales is the LVP. During the past ten years LVP has shown year-over-year growth with the exception of the years 2018-2020. Despite strong end-consumer demand for new vehicles, global light vehicle production (LVP). During 2018 we experienced significant changes only grew by 3% in LVP, especially2021 - significantly less than the 14% expected by IHS Markit in Europe impacted by the new emission testing WLTP and in China due to lower consumer demand for vehicles. Asbeginning of the year. This was a result full-year 2018of the COVID-19 pandemic continuing to impact the availability of semiconductors as well as other parts of the global automotive supply chain.

During 2021 the Company experienced a recovery of global LVP declined by 1%. This came after eight straight yearsin the early parts of LVP growth. In 2017, the LVP grew by 2% and in 2016, the year-over-year growth in LVP was 5%.

Light Vehicle Production

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

Change '18 vs ´16

 

 

 

(000´) units

 

 

% global

 

 

(000´) units

 

 

% global

 

 

(000´) units

 

 

% global

 

 

(000´) units

 

 

%

 

Americas

 

 

19,124

 

 

 

21

%

 

 

19,185

 

 

 

21

%

 

 

19,421

 

 

 

22

%

 

 

(296

)

 

 

(2

)%

 

North America

 

15,751

 

 

 

17

%

 

 

15,920

 

 

 

17

%

 

 

16,678

 

 

 

19

%

 

 

(927

)

 

 

(6

)%

 

South America

 

3,373

 

 

 

4

%

 

 

3,265

 

 

 

4

%

 

 

2,743

 

 

 

3

%

 

 

630

 

 

 

23

%

Europe

 

 

21,887

 

 

 

24

%

 

 

22,180

 

 

 

24

%

 

 

21,458

 

 

 

24

%

 

 

429

 

 

 

2

%

Asia

 

 

47,811

 

 

 

52

%

 

 

48,233

 

 

 

52

%

 

 

46,890

 

 

 

52

%

 

 

921

 

 

 

2

%

 

China

 

25,696

 

 

 

28

%

 

 

26,575

 

 

 

29

%

 

 

25,952

 

 

 

29

%

 

 

(256

)

 

 

(1

)%

 

Japan

 

9,052

 

 

 

10

%

 

 

9,021

 

 

 

10

%

 

 

8,517

 

 

 

9

%

 

 

535

 

 

 

6

%

 

South Korea

 

3,951

 

 

 

4

%

 

 

4,023

 

 

 

4

%

 

 

4,143

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

(192

)

 

 

(5

)%

 

India

 

4,712

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

4,420

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

4,136

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

577

 

 

 

14

%

 

Other Asia

 

4,400

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

4,194

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

4,142

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

258

 

 

 

6

%

Other

 

 

2,522

 

 

 

3

%

 

 

2,530

 

 

 

3

%

 

 

2,287

 

 

 

3

%

 

 

235

 

 

 

10

%

Global

   Total

 

 

91,344

 

 

 

100

%

 

 

92,128

 

 

 

100

%

 

 

90,056

 

 

 

100

%

 

 

1,288

 

 

 

1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The main markets contributing to theyear, while increased industry wide supply chain issues, especially semi-conductor availability, lowered global LVP growth during 2016 to 2018 were South America and India. Affected by political factors and microeconomics in the second halfand especially the third quarter. In the fourth quarter of 2018, 2021, LVP rebounded as compared to the third quarter indicating improved availability of semiconductors.

Light Vehicle Production1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

Change 2021 vs 2020

 

 

 

(000´)
units

 

 

% global

 

 

(000´)
units

 

 

% global

 

 

(000´)
units

 

 

%

 

Americas

 

 

14,507

 

 

 

20

%

 

 

14,178

 

 

 

20

%

 

 

330

 

 

 

2

%

 

North America

 

11,922

 

 

 

16

%

 

 

11,948

 

 

 

17

%

 

 

(26

)

 

 

(0

)%

 

South America

 

2,586

 

 

 

4

%

 

 

2,230

 

 

 

3

%

 

 

356

 

 

 

16

%

Europe

 

 

15,623

 

 

 

21

%

 

 

16,454

 

 

 

23

%

 

 

(831

)

 

 

(5

)%

Asia

 

 

41,371

 

 

 

56

%

 

 

39,180

 

 

 

55

%

 

 

2,191

 

 

 

6

%

 

China

 

23,028

 

 

 

31

%

 

 

21,959

 

 

 

31

%

 

 

1,069

 

 

 

5

%

 

Japan

 

7,292

 

 

 

10

%

 

 

7,624

 

 

 

11

%

 

 

(332

)

 

 

(4

)%

 

South Korea

 

3,390

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

3,449

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

(59

)

 

 

(2

)%

 

India

 

4,055

 

 

 

6

%

 

 

3,234

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

821

 

 

 

25

%

 

Other Asia

 

3,605

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

2,913

 

 

 

4

%

 

 

692

 

 

 

24

%

Other

 

 

1,925

 

 

 

3

%

 

 

1,727

 

 

 

2

%

 

 

198

 

 

 

11

%

Global Total

 

73,425

 

 

 

 

 

 

71,538

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,887

 

 

 

3

%

 1) Source: IHS Markit

 

Chinese LVP, declinedthe world’s largest automotive market, increased by 1%1.1 million units or by 5% from 20162020 to 2018.2021. In Europe, which is an important market for automotive safety systems, LVP increaseddecreased by 2%5% or by approximately 0.40.8 million light vehicles during the same three-year period. In North America, LVP declined by 6% or 0.9 million light vehicles. Thanks to strong domestic demand and growing export to other countries, LVP in India increased by 14% during the three-year period to 4.7 million light vehicles in 2018.was virtually unchanged from 2020.

Europe’s share of global LVP has remaineddeclined to 21% from 23% while Americas share was unchanged at 24%,20% and China’s share remained at 31%. Japan’s share declined to 10% from 11% while North America has declinedIndia's share increased to 6% from 19%5%.

We expect light vehicle markets to 17%grow both in the short and China from 29%long term, especially in the next few years, driven by pent-up end user
demand and a rebuilding of new vehicle inventories. The growth is expected
to 28% during the same three-year period.take place in all regions.

ThanksDue to more stringent crash ratings,test rating requirements, by institutes such as EuroNCAP;Euro NCAP; increased government regulations and increasing consumer demand for more safety in emerging markets, we seethe Company sees vehicle manufacturers installing more airbags and more advanced seatbelt systems in their vehicles. This generally happenstakes place when new models are introduced. The safety standards of vehicles are increasing in China, India and other growth markets such as Brazil, partially due to new government regulations and crash test rating programs. For example, the Indian government has decided on a new traffic regulation that mandates more rigid crash test standards offor light vehicles. This should eventually lead to ais supporting higher installation rate of airbags and more advanced seatbelts. Thanks to these positive worldwide trends, as well as currency translationseatbelts, impacting CPV positively, partly offset by negative effects the average global safety content (airbags, seatbelts and steering wheels) per light vehicle (CPV) has increased from around $220 to around $225 during the period 2017-2018. This increase comes despite the fact that growth in global LVP is mostly in markets with lower average safety CPV such as South America and India, where the CPV is only approximately $170 and $80, respectively. In addition, there is a negative effect from continued pricing pressure from vehicle manufacturers. The trend of increasing CPV was negatively impacted in 2021 by the unfavorable regional LVP mix development, as LVP in higher safety content regions such as Western Europe, North America, Japan and South Korea declined, while LVP in lower safety content regions such as South America, China and India increased. This negative regional mix effect was more than offset by the overall increase in global CPV of around 2% and the execution of the Company's strong order book, leading to a record number of product launches which supported an organic growth (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) of 5.2pp above growth in global LVP. The average global safety CPV (airbags, pedestrian safety, seatbelts and steering wheels) amounted to around $250 in 2021.

These trendsThe more stringent crash rating requirements and consumer demand for more safety should enable the global automotive safety market to grow around 2pp per year faster than the global LVP during the next three years.

The past years’ high order intake share have resulted in the Company's sales development outperforming the underlying LVP significantly in the past three years. In 2021, the Company's organic sales (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) development outpaced global LVP by around 5 percentage points, due to increased safety content per vehicle and as an effect of recent years high order intake share.

The Company estimates that the sales to Plug-In Hybrids (PHEV) and Battery Electric Vehicles (BEV) amounted to more than $1.2 billion in 2021, an increase of more than 60% compared to the previous year.

32


WELL BALANCED GLOBAL FOOTPRINT

Autoliv’sThe Company's regional sales mix continues to be balanced with 32%28% of sales in Europe, 31% in the Americas and 37%41% in Asia in 2018,2021, compared to 32%28%, 32%31% and 36%41%, respectively, in 2017.2020. In Asia, ourthe Company's sales in the important Chinese market represents 18%remained at 21% of total sales in 2018, despite2021. The Company's sales in India increased to 3% of the first droptotal sales in LVP2021 from 2% in the country in decades. Regardless of the short-term weakness in the Chinese market, we remain well positioned in this market, which is the world’s largest automotive producing market.2020.

The balanced regional sales mix has been achieved through timely investments and strengthening of technical and support capabilities in growth markets and early introduction and execution of our restructuring and capacity alignment activities. To further improve our competitiveness, we have also made substantial investments to increase manufacturing capacity for vertical integration in China and Thailand.markets.

For Asia as a whole, the effect of the higher sales in China, Japan and India was partly offset by declining sales in South Korea.

A fast-growing customer from 2016 to 2018 has been Honda. Their share of our sales has increased from close to 7% to 8% during the three-year period. The largest customer based in Asia is Hyundai/Kia, accounting for 8% of Autoliv sales. The local Chinese OEMs as a group accounted for around 4% of our sales in 2018, with Great Wall representing 2%.

Our sales to premium brand OEMs accounted for around 18% of total sales, while their share of global LVP is approximately 11%. Our strong position with premium OEMs reflects the higher safety content in their vehicles along with our position as a technology leader in the automotive safety market. Of the European OEMs, Daimler stands out, accounting for 6% of Autoliv’s total sales, representing more than two times their global LVP market share. This is a result of our strong position within advanced safety solutions in their vehicles.  

The Detroit Three automobile manufacturers, Ford, Fiat Chrysler and GM, account for 8%, 8% and 4% of our total sales, respectively. Because Autoliv was on a new business hold with GM during 2011-2012 and PSA’s acquisition of GM’s European brand Opel, GM’s share of Autoliv total sales declined from 8% in 2016 to 4% in 2018. This has affected most regions not only Europe and North America.

CONTINUED STRONG ORDER INTAKE SHARE

Building on a strong base, including supplying our delivering products to approximately 1,300more than 1,100 vehicle models and around 100 car brands, Autolivthe Company estimates that it in 2021 for the seventh consecutive year recorded its highestan order intake ever during the period 2016-2018, winning around 50%share of available orders. Our share of order intake inorders that was above the past three years is significantly above ourCompany's sales market share, ofwhich in 2021 the Company estimates increased to around 40% in 2018. Part of43% from 42% the high order intake is the consequence of major recalls by another airbag manufacturer. The most substantial increase in order intake was in 2015, where it increased by 80% compared to 2014, to $11.9 billion. Since 2016, order intake has continued to increase and reached in 2018 $15.5 billion in estimated life-time sales, an increase of 26% compared to 2016.

Due to the lead time from order to start of production, 2017 was the first year the increased level of order intake began to impact our sales. The sales growth has substantially accelerated during 2018, outgrowing LVP with close to 10% in the fourth quarter. During 2018, growth was positively affected through recent launches of several new models, including e.g. Dodge Ram 1500, Tesla Model 3 and Honda Accord.prior year. The lead time from order intake to start of production is typically 18-36 months. During this period the products are engineered into the vehicle to provide the expected protection for occupants in case of a crash and to meet legal and regulatory requirements, as well as other requirements from the vehicle manufacturer. This investment in new products is the main reason for the increase inhigh level of RD&E expenses, net, between 2016 and 2018.net. Additionally, we havethe Company has to build up production capacity, in the form of new lines, and buildings, to meet future product launches.


The Company's order intake share for 2021 continued on a high level. The Company estimates that it booked around 50% of available order value in 2021. The estimated life-time sales for all orders booked in 2021 is around $11 billion, compared to around $10 billion in 2020. New order intake is defined as the sales value of awards for future business, received within that year. The life time value is calculated using detailed assumptions of price and volumes over the years of production and the exchange rates prevailing at the time of receiving the order.

OPERATIONAL INITIATIVES

Due to the lead time from order to start of production, 2017 was the first year that the increased level of order intake began to impact the Company's sales. Over the last four years, wesales have seensubstantially outperformed the change in global LVP. In both 2021 and 2020 the outperformance was around 5pp. During 2021, growth was positively affected through recent launches of several new models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Toyota Sienna, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mercedes S-Class, Dacia Logan and Sandero, Genesis GV70.

STRATEGIC INITIATIVES AND STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS

The expected 2021 light vehicle market recovery was hampered by an unevenindustry wide shortage of semi-conductors while raw material inflation resulted in significant increases in cost for purchased material. In response, Autoliv management continued to implement strict cost control measures, adapting manning levels to the demand decline. By December 31, 2021, total headcount was reduced by around 8,000 compared to December 31, 2020. In addition to continuously adjusting the labor force to short term demand fluctuations, management actions include footprint and capacity utilizationalignment in Europe, as well as moving overhead functions to Best Cost Countries in Americas, and initiating further footprint adjustments in Japan and in the Rest of Asia.

Additionally, the Company has introduced several initiatives in previous years, such as the Structural Efficiency Program 1 and 2. The first program was fully implemented in 2020 and the second program is expected to be fully implemented in 2022.

The provision, net of our plants, mainly in Europe. The costsreversals, for restructuring activities in 20182021 amounted to $9$8 million compared to $23$99 million in 2017 and to $21 million in 2016

The current restructuring activities are expected to have a payback period of around 3 years, or more, after cash-out. The cash payments in 2018 were $14 million compared to $23 million in 2017 and $71 million in 2016.2020. As of December 31, 2018, we have $332021, the Company has $88 million reserved in ourits balance sheet related to restructuring (seecompared to $126 million last year. For more information, see Note 1211 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein).herein.

Capital expenditures, netIn addition to the structural improvements outlined above, the Company continues to implement the strategic initiatives to improve the efficiency of $486 millionits value chain from end to end, not least through the Autoliv Production System and increased digitalization and automation. With several hundred projects in 2018, was $22 millionimplementation or undergoing development, the Company has a high pace in the planning and $88 million higher than in 2017implementation of the strategic initiatives and 2016, respectively.  In relationstructural improvements. These initiatives are key drivers to sales Capital expenditures, net was 5.6% in 2018the Company's medium-term targets and 5.7% in 2017 and 5.0% in 2016. The level of Capital expenditures, net, supports our growth strategy and reflectsbuilding the high order intake for the period 2016foundation to 2018.continue to create shareholder value.

33


IMPROVED EFFICIENCIES THROUGH OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE

Pricing pressure is an inherent part of the automotive supplier business. Price reductions are generally higher on newer products with strong volume growth compared to older products, where both the possibilities to re-design the product to reduce costs and market growth are less. Price reductions can also depend on the business cycle. cycle and raw material price development. For the five-year period 2017-2021, the period 2016-2018, we estimateCompany estimates the average reduction of our marketproduct prices on existing programs to have been in the range of around 2-4% annually. As described below,

A key strategy to meet these price reductions we have implemented severalis to reduce labor costs, through continuously implementing productivity improvement programs, optimizing the Company's production footprint and takeninstituting restructuring and capacity alignment activities as well as other actions to address every item in ourthe Company's cost structure. Additionally, during the period 2016-2018, we have experienced raw material commodity costs increase of around $30 million.

OurThe Company's productivity improvement target is to achieve at least 5% savings per year. To meet this target, Autoliv has developed a set of strategies to reduce costs in manufacturing:

Autoliv production system (APS) is based on lean manufacturing methodology which aims to continuously increase output with less resources. APS provides the target conditions and tools to achieve the delivery of goods and services at the right time, in the right amount, at the required quality and at the lowest cost possible to all ourthe Company's customers.

OurAutoliv One Product One Process (1P1P) strategy focuses on product and process standardization and reducing cost and complexity. The 1P1P strategy, combined with initiatives to reduce costs for components from external suppliers, ensures that wethe Company continuously optimize ourits supply base footprint, consolidate purchase volumes to fewer suppliers, improve productivity in ourthe Company's supply chain, standardize components and redesign ourits products.

Strategic Initiatives including Automation, Digitalization, Supply Chain Management Effectiveness and RD&E Effectiveness.

TheseThe Company's historic experience is that the continuous improvement strategies have enabled productivity improvements in Autoliv’s manufacturingimprovement at or above its target of over 5% for four out of the five past years. It was only in 2018 that the target. However, this was not achieved because of elevated launch related costs.

To reduce labor costs while offsetting the price erosion on our products, we continuously implement productivity improvement programs, expand production in Best Cost Countries (BCCs) and institute restructuring and capacity alignment activities. The number of employeescase in the BCCspast two years due to the COVID-19 pandemic related decline in relation to total headcount has increased slightly from 78%LVP in 2016 to over 80%2020 and the high volatility in 2018.  customer call-offs in 2021 driven by the industry wide supply chain instability, especially for semi-conductors.

These initiatives, in combination with our restructuring activities, investment in vertical integration and several other actions, are in place to offset the market price erosion.

We foreseeThe Company foresees opportunities for further productivity on gains from LVP recovery and increased call-off stability when supply of semi-conductors eventually improves, but also from increasing use of automation in ourits assembly for lean manufacturing processes. Additionally, automated cells typically perform the manufacturing process with reduced variability. This results in greater control and consistency of product quality.

FOCUS ON QUALITY INCREASING

The number of vehicle recalls in the automotive industry has risen sharply over the last fewin recent years. InStarting in 2015, and 2016, Takata’s airbag inflators recall generated a record number of recalls in the automotive industry. We expectThe Company expects overall recall numbers to remain high for years to come and, although we strivethe Company strives for the highest quality in ourits processes, it cannot be ruled out that wethe Company may also be adversely impacted by a future recall.

Quality has been and always will be ourthe Company's number one priority, and we continuethe Company continues to sharpen ourits focus in this area. WeThe Company now commandholds a global market share of 40% in passive safety. Atsafety of around 43%, while the same time, we haveCompany has been involved in less than around 2% of passive safety recalls in the industry insince 2010. This indicates that the past ten years; an important indicator that we areCompany is delivering on ourits quality strategy. For more information see product warranty and recalls in Note 1312 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report.

CHANGES IN COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

During the period 2016 to 2018, wepast seven years, Autoliv experienced significant changes in ourits competitive landscape. In 2015, TRW, a key competitor in passive safety, was acquired by German group ZF Friedrichshafen. Combined, the new company is the third-largestsecond largest passive safety supplier globally. In 2016, Key Safety Systems (“KSS”) was acquired by Ningbo Joyson Electronic Corp. Beginning in 2014, Takata, ourAutoliv's largest competitor at the time, experienced severe issues and recalls related to malfunctioning airbag inflators, leading the company to file for bankruptcy protection in the U.S. and Japan. In 2018, Joyson substantially acquired all of Takata's global assets and operations and combined it with KSS, forming the new company JSS.


Combined, the new company is the third largest passive safety supplier globally.

34


European Commission AntitruSt Investigation

Since 2011, Autoliv has been subject to an investigation of anti-competitive behavior among suppliers of occupant safety systems by the European Commission (EC). We now have reason to believe that the EC will seek to impose a fine of approximately 185 million Euros in connection with the remaining portion of the EC investigation. Therefore, the Company accrued $210 million in the fourth quarter of 2018. The Company believes that a fine could be issued during the first half of 2019, although this may be delayed.

CAPITAL STRUCTURE

The Company’s net debt wasstood at $1,619$1,052 million on December 31, 2018.2021. This was an increase by $1,250a decrease of $163 million compared to December 31, 2017. The increase was mainly driven by the $972 million capitalization of Veoneer prior to the spin-off.2020. Total interest bearinginterest-bearing debt at December 31, 20182021 amounted to $2,230$2,008 million, an increase by $899a decrease of $403 million compared to December 31, 2017.2020.

Cash flow from operations including discontinued operations, was $591$754 million in 20182021 and $936$849 million in 2017.2020. Capital expenditures, net amounted to $555$454 million in 20182021 and $570$340 million in 2017.2020. During the two-year period 2017-20182021 and 2020 the Company paid dividends of $423$165 million and repurchased shares for $157 million. After$54 million, respectively. In the latest declared dividendsecond quarter of 62 cents per share,2020, the annualized run rate is $216 million, based on numberCompany suspended the dividends due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The dividends where reinstated in the second quarter of shares outstanding at December 31, 2018.2021.

It is the Company’s policy to maintain a financial leverage commensurate with a “strong investment grade credit rating” and our. The long-term target is to have a leverage ratio (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) of around 1.0 times1.0x and to be within the range of 0.5 times0.5x to 1.5 times. We monitor our1.5x. At December 31, 2021, the current leverage ratio is 1.2x. The Company monitors its capital structure and the financial markets closely and intendintends to maintain a high level of financial flexibility while being shareholder friendly.

As part of the adjustment of the capital structure, the Company historically has repurchased shares of its common stock. During 2018,2021 and 2020, the Company did not repurchase any shares, during 2017, the Company repurchased 1.4 million shares for approximately $157 million, including commissions. Atshares. On December 31, 2018,2021, the remaining number of sharesstock repurchase program authorized by the boardBoard of directorsDirectors in 2014 expired with approximately 3 million shares remaining. In November 2021, the Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program that authorizes the Company to repurchase up to $1.5 billion or up to 17 million shares (whichever comes first) between January 2022 and the end of 2024.

Outlook for repurchase is approximately 3.0 million shares.2022

CURRENCY IMPACTS

The Company is exposed to around 50 currency pairs, with exposures in excess of $1 million each. We are monitoring our currency exposure but do not hedge currency flows. Rather we strive to have sales and costsCompany's outlook indications for 2022 reflect continuing uncertainty in the same currency to reduce the transaction exposure risk. The total net transaction exposure in 2018 was approximately $2.4 billion or 28% of sales. Approximately three quarters of our salesautomotive markets and are denominated in other currencies than U.S. dollars, which is leading to currency translation effects.

Outlook for 2019

Mainlymainly based on ourthe Company's customer call-offs and a light vehicle productionglobal LVP outlook that is slightly below theaccording to IHS estimate, the indication for organic sales growth for theMarkit (January 2022), indicating a full year 2019 is around 5%. Currency translations are expected to have a combined negative effect2022 global LVP growth of around 1%, resulting in a consolidated sales increase of around 4%9%. The

Financial measure

Full year indication

LVP growth

Around 9%

Organic sales growth

Around 20%

FX

Around -3%

Adjusted operating margin1)

Around 9.5%

Tax rate 2)

Around 30%

Operating cash flow3)

Around $950 million

Capital expenditures, net % of sales

Around 5.5%

1) Excluding costs for adjusted operating margin for the full year 2019 is around 10.5%.capacity alignments, anti-trust related matters and other discrete items.

The projected2) Excluding unusual tax rate, excludingitems.

3) Excluding unusual items, for the full year 2019, is expected to be around 28%, and is subject to change due to nonrecurring events that may occur.items.

The projected operating cash flow for the full year 2019, excluding any unusual items, is expected to be higher than for Continuing Operations full year 2018 of around $810 million. The projected capital expenditures as percent of sales, net, for the full year 2019 is expected to be lower than for Continuing Operations full year 2018 of around 5.6%.

The projected R,D&E, net, as percent of sales, for the full year 2019 is expected to be lower than for Continuing Operations full year 2018 of around 4.8%. The projected leverage ratio is expected to be well within our target range of 0.5x to 1.5x at the end of 2019.

The forward-looking non-U.S. GAAP financial measures above are provided on a non-U.S. GAAP basis. Autoliv has not provided a U.S. GAAP reconciliation of these measures because items that impact these measures, such as costs related to capacity alignments and antitrust matters, cannot be reasonably predicted or determined. As a result, such reconciliation is not available without unreasonable efforts and Autoliv is unable to determine the probable significance of the unavailable information.

Significant Legal Matters

The Company is subject to ongoing antitrust investigations by governmental authorities in several jurisdictions as well as related civil litigation. For further discussion of these antitrust matters and other legal proceedings seeSee Item 3. Legal Proceedings and Note 1817 Contingent Liabilities to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report.


Year Ended December 31, 2018 Versus 201735


results of operations

Sales by Product

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Components Of Change In Net Sales

 

 

 

2018

Sales (MUSD)

 

 

2017

Sales (MUSD)

 

 

Reported

change

 

 

Currency effects1)

 

 

Organic

 

Airbags products and Other2)

 

$

5,698

 

 

$

5,343

 

 

 

6.7

%

 

 

1.8

%

 

 

4.9

%

Seatbelt products2)

 

 

2,980

 

 

 

2,794

 

 

 

6.7

%

 

 

2.2

%

 

 

4.5

%

Total

 

$

8,678

 

 

$

8,137

 

 

 

6.7

%

 

 

1.9

%

 

 

4.8

%

1)

Effects from currency translations.

2)

Including Corporate and Other sales.

Consolidated net salessales in 2021 increased by 6.7%10.5 % compared to full year 2017 with an organic growth (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) of 4.8% and2020. Excluding positive currency translation effects of 1.9%.

Airbag2.6 %, the organic sales grew organicallyincreased (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) by 4.9%, mainly driven7.9 %.

Sales by Product

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Components of Change in Net Sales

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

Reported
change

 

 

Currency effects1)

 

 

Organic

 

Airbags products and Other2)

 

$

5,380

 

 

$

4,824

 

 

 

11.5

%

 

 

2.2

%

 

 

9.3

%

Seatbelt products2)

 

 

2,850

 

 

 

2,623

 

 

 

8.6

%

 

 

3.4

%

 

 

5.2

%

Total

 

$

8,230

 

 

$

7,447

 

 

 

10.5

%

 

 

2.6

%

 

 

7.9

%

1) Effects from currency translations.

2) Including Corporate and Other sales.

Sales of all airbag product categories except inflators increased organically (Non-U.S. GAAP measure, see reconciliation table above) in the full year 2021. The largest contributor to growth was steering wheels in North America, Europe and China and from inflatable curtains, in North America, partly offsetfollowed by passenger airbags, driver airbags and knee airbags.

Seatbelt products showed strong organic sales decline of inflatable curtains in Europe.

Seatbelt sales grew organically (see section Non-U.S.growth (Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) by 4.5%, mainly driven by growth in Northmeasure, see reconciliation table above) with largest contributing markets being China, South America India and China,India, partly offset by declines in Europe.South Korea and Japan.

Sales by Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Components Of Change In Net Sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Components of Change in Net Sales

 

 

2018

Sales (MUSD)

 

 

2017

Sales (MUSD)

 

 

Reported

change

 

 

Currency effects1)

 

 

Organic

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

Reported
change

 

 

Currency effects1)

 

 

Organic

 

Asia

 

$

3,195

 

 

$

2,998

 

 

 

6.6

%

 

 

1.9

%

 

 

4.7

%

 

$

3,407

 

 

$

3,043

 

 

 

12.0

%

 

3.2

%

 

8.7

%

Whereof: China

 

 

1,522

 

 

 

1,421

 

 

 

7.1

%

 

 

2.2

%

 

 

4.9

%

 

 

1,766

 

 

 

1,541

 

 

 

14.6

%

 

7.1

%

 

7.5

%

Japan

 

 

828

 

 

 

787

 

 

 

5.2

%

 

 

1.6

%

 

 

3.6

%

 

 

733

 

 

 

733

 

 

 

(0.0

)%

 

(2.7

)%

 

2.7

%

Rest of Asia

 

 

845

 

 

 

790

 

 

 

6.9

%

 

 

1.3

%

 

 

5.6

%

 

 

908

 

 

 

769

 

 

 

18.0

%

 

1.0

%

 

17.0

%

Americas

 

 

2,735

 

 

 

2,435

 

 

 

12.3

%

 

 

(1.0

)%

 

 

13.3

%

 

 

2,535

 

 

 

2,337

 

 

 

8.5

%

 

1.1

%

 

7.3

%

Europe

 

 

2,748

 

 

 

2,704

 

 

 

1.7

%

 

 

4.5

%

 

 

(2.8

)%

 

 

2,289

 

 

 

2,067

 

 

 

10.7

%

 

3.5

%

 

7.2

%

Global

 

$

8,678

 

 

$

8,137

 

 

 

6.7

%

 

 

1.9

%

 

 

4.8

%

 

$

8,230

 

 

$

7,447

 

 

 

10.5

%

 

2.6

%

 

7.9

%

1)

Effects from currency translations.

1) Effects from currency translations.

For the full year 2018,2021, Autoliv’s sales grewincreased organically (see section(Non-U.S. GAAP measure, see reconciliation table above) by 7.9 % compared to 2020, which was 5.2 percentage points better than LVP (according to IHS Markit, January 2022). Sales increased organically in all regions. The largest organic sales increase drivers were Americas and Europe, followed by Rest of Asia, China and Japan. The Company's organic sales development outperformed LVP in all regions - by 12 percentage points in Europe, by 7 percentage points in Japan, by 5 percentage points in Americas, by 3 percentage points in China and by 2 percentage points in Rest of Asia.

2021 Organic growth1)

 

Americas

 

Europe

 

China

 

Japan

 

Rest of Asia

 

Global

Autoliv

 

7.3%

 

7.2%

 

7.5%

 

2.7%

 

17.0%

 

7.9%

Main growth drivers

 

Toyota, Stellantis, Ford

 

Daimler, VW, BMW

 

Geely, GM,
Wuling

 

Mitsubishi,
Toyota,
Nissan

 

Mitsubishi,
Toyota, Tata

 

Toyota,
Stellantis,
Mitsubishi

Main decline drivers

 

Honda, Subaru,
Mazda

 

Renault, Ford,
Nissan

 

VW,
Hyundai/Kia,
Great Wall

 

Honda,
Mazda

 

Hyundai/Kia,
SsangYong

 

Honda,
Great Wall,
BYD

1) Non-U.S. GAAP Measure

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36


Condensed Statement of Income

 

Years ended December 31

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions, except per share data)

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

Change

 

Net Sales

$

8,230

 

 

$

7,447

 

 

 

10.5

%

Gross profit

 

1,511

 

 

 

1,247

 

 

 

21.2

%

% of sales

 

18.4

%

 

 

16.7

%

 

 

1.6

pp

S,G&A

 

(432

)

 

 

(389

)

 

 

11.1

%

% of sales

 

(5.3

)%

 

 

(5.2

)%

 

 

(0.0)pp

 

R,D&E net

 

(391

)

 

 

(376

)

 

 

4.0

%

% of sales

 

(4.7

)%

 

 

(5.0

)%

 

 

0.3

pp

Other income (expense), net

 

(3

)

 

 

(90

)

 

 

(96.3

)%

Operating income

 

675

 

 

 

382

 

 

 

76.6

%

% of sales

 

8.2

%

 

 

5.1

%

 

 

3.1

pp

Adjusted operating income3)

 

683

 

 

 

482

 

 

 

41.8

%

% of sales

 

8.3

%

 

 

6.5

%

 

 

1.8

pp

Financial and non-operating items, net

 

(61

)

 

 

(91

)

 

 

(33.3

)%

Income before taxes

 

614

 

 

 

291

 

 

 

111

%

Tax rate

 

28.9

%

 

 

35.3

%

 

 

(6.4)pp

 

Net income

 

437

 

 

 

188

 

 

 

132

%

Earnings per share, diluted1, 2)

 

4.96

 

 

 

2.14

 

 

 

132

%

Adjusted earnings per share, diluted1, 2), 3)

 

5.02

 

 

 

3.15

 

 

 

59.4

%

1) Assuming dilution and net of treasury shares.

2) Participating share awards with right to receive dividend equivalents are (under the two-class method) excluded from the EPS calculation.

3) Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures)Measure.

Gross Profit

In 2021, Gross profit increased by 4.8%$264 million and the gross margin increased by 1.6 pp compared to full year 2017, almost 6pp more than2020. The gross profit increase was primarily driven by higher sales from growing LVP growth according to IHS. The largest contributors toand execution of the organic growth were North America, ChinaCompany's strong order book.

Operating Income

Operating income increased in 2021 by $293 million, mainly as a consequence of improvement of gross profit and India,other income (expense), net, partly offset by Europe and South Korea.

The organic sales increase (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) from Autoliv’s companies in China of 4.9% was driven by both domestic and global OEMs. Sales growth to domestic OEMs was mainly with Geely, including Lynk & Co, and Great Wall while growth with the global OEMs was mainly with VW, Honda and Nissan.

Organic sales growth (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) of 3.6% from Autoliv’s companies in Japan was mainly derived from sales to Subaru and Mitsubishi as well as inflator replacement sales.

Organic sales growth (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) from Autoliv’s companies in the Rest of Asia of 5.6% was driven by strong sales development in India, which grew organically by 26%, mainly from sales to Suzuki, Honda, Tata and Hyundai/Kia. Sales in South Korea decreased, driven mainly by lower sales to Hyundai/Kia.

The organic growth (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) from Autoliv’s companies in Americas was 13.3%. North America grew organically by 13.1% mainly due to new model launches with FCA, Honda, Nissan, Tesla and VW, partly offset by lower sales to Daimler, GM and Ford. Overall growth was driven by all main product groups. Sales in South America grew organically by 18.2%, mainly due to increased sales to FCA and VW.


The 2.8% organic sales decline (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) from Autoliv’s companies in Europe was mainly driven by Renault, FCA, BMW, JLR, PSA and Ford, partly offset by strong performance with premium brands such as Daimler and Volvo.

 

Years ended December 31

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions, except per share data)

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

Change

 

Net Sales

$

8,678

 

 

$

8,137

 

 

 

6.7

%

Gross profit

 

1,711

 

 

 

1,680

 

 

 

1.9

%

% of sales

 

19.7

%

 

 

20.6

%

 

 

(0.9

)pp

S,G&A

 

(390

)

 

 

(407

)

 

 

(4.0

)%

% of sales

 

(4.5

)%

 

 

(5.0

)%

 

 

(0.5

)pp

R,D&E net

 

(413

)

 

 

(371

)

 

 

11.3

%

% of sales

 

(4.8

)%

 

 

(4.6

)%

 

 

0.2

pp

Other income (expense), net

 

(211

)

 

 

(32

)

 

 

565.9

%

% of sales

 

(2.4

)%

 

 

(0.4

)%

 

 

2.0

pp

Operating income

 

686

 

 

 

860

 

 

 

(20.2

)%

% of sales

 

7.9

%

 

 

10.6

%

 

 

(2.7

)pp

Interest expense, net

 

(59

)

 

 

(54

)

 

 

9.3

%

Income before taxes

 

612

 

 

 

792

 

 

 

(22.7

)%

Tax rate

 

38.4

%

 

 

25.8

%

 

 

12.6

pp

Income attributable to controlling interest from Continuing

   Operations

 

376

 

 

 

586

 

 

 

(35.9

)%

Earnings per share Continuing Operations, diluted1, 2)

 

4.31

 

 

 

6.68

 

 

 

(35.5

)%

1)

Assuming dilution and net of treasury shares.

2)

Participating share awards with right to receive dividend equivalents are (under the two class method) excluded from the EPS calculation.

GROSS PROFIT

The gross profit for the full year 2018 increased by $32 million, compared to the prior year, as a result of higher sales partly offset by a lower gross margin. The gross margin decreased by 0.9pp compared to full year 2017, mainly due to adverse impact from launch related costs, raw material costs and currency changes which more than offset the operating leverage on the increased sales.

OPERATING INCOME

Operating income decreased by $174 million to $686 million. The reported operating margin was 7.9% of sales, compared to 10.6% of sales in the prior year. The decrease of 2.7pp of sales was mainly due to higher costs for antitrust related matters, compared to, reported as Other income (expense), net, lower gross marginS,G&A and higher R,D&E, net costs.net.

Selling, General and Administrative (S,G&A) expenses decreasedincreased in 2021 by $16$43 million, or 0.5pp of sales driven by transition service agreement income, lower bonus accruals11.1 %, mainly relating to higher personnel costs due to extensive furloughing the prior year, increased IT and lower legal costs. project costs and adverse FX effects.

Research, Development & Engineering (R,D&E) expenses, net as percent of sales was 4.8% comparedincreased in 2021 by $15 million, or by 4.0 %, mainly due to 4.6% in the same periodhigher personnel costs due to extensive furloughing the prior year mainly as a result of the significant increase in product launches during the first half of 2018 and continued strong order intake.

INTEREST EXPENSE, NET

Interest expense, net in full year 2018 was $59 million. The increase of $5 million compared to $54 million in full year 2017 is related to interest expenses after issuing the 500 million Eurobond in June 2018adverse FX effects partly offset by less USPP debt. Interesthigher engineering income. In relation to sales, R,D&E costs declined from 5.1% to 4.7%.

Other income was close to $7(expense), net decreased by $87 million in full year 2018, $0.5 million lower2021 compared to fullthe previous year, 2017mainly due to$90 million in lower capacity alignment costs, partly offset by adverse effects from FX effects and lower government income.

Financial and Non-operating Items, net

Financial and non-operating items, net, costs increased by $30 million in 2021 compared to previous year, mainly due to lower cash balances.interest expense, net, but also due to positive effects from currency translations and other financial items.

Income Taxes

INCOME TAXES

The effective tax rate in 2018 was 38.4% compared to 25.8% in 2017. The tax rate for 2018 excluding discrete tax items2021 was 29.1%28.9 %, compared to 24.8%35.3 % in 2017. The tax rate for 2018 was impacted by several items, including additional tax cost recorded related2020, mainly due to the U.S. transition taxan unfavorable country mix in 2020.

Net Income and the impact of the antitrust accrual, which is not deductible for tax purposes. The tax rate for 2017 was impacted by the reversal of the valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets and the estimate of the negative impact of the U.S. tax reform (specifically the deemed repatriation of non-U.S. earnings and the revaluation of U.S. deferred tax assets to the new lower U.S. tax rate). See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.Earnings Per Share

NET INCOME AND EARNINGS PER SHARE

Net income attributablein 2021 increased by $249 million compared to controlling interest from Continuing Operations decreased year on year2020 primarily driven by the antitrust accrualhigher gross profit, lower capacity alignment costs and lower interest expense, net, as noted above.

Earnings per share, (EPS) from Continuing Operations assuming dilution decreaseddiluted, increased by 35.5% to $4.31 compared to $6.68 for$2.83 where the same period one year ago. The main items affecting EPS negativelydrivers were 208 cents$1.29 from higher adjusted operating income (Non-U.S. GAAP measure, see reconciliation table below) , $0.95 from lower costs primarily relating tofor capacity alignment and antitrust related matters, $0.40 from lower tax and 42 cents$0.19 from higher underlying tax rate. The main offsetting effects were 15 cents from discrete taxfinancial items.

The weighted average number of shares outstanding assuming dilution was 87.3 million compared to 87.7 million for full year of 2017.


Year Ended December 31, 2017 Versus 2016

Sales by Product

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Components Of Change In

Net Sales

 

 

 

2017

(Sales MUSD)

 

 

2016

(Sales MUSD)

 

 

Reported

change

 

 

Currency

effects1)

 

 

Organic

 

Airbags products and Other2)

 

$

5,343

 

 

$

5,257

 

 

 

1.6

%

 

 

0.3

%

 

 

1.3

%

Seatbelt products2)

 

 

2,794

 

 

 

2,665

 

 

 

4.8

%

 

 

0.8

%

 

 

4.0

%

Total

 

$

8,137

 

 

$

7,922

 

 

 

2.7

%

 

 

0.5

%

 

 

2.2

%

1)

Effects from currency translations.

2)

Including Corporate and Other sales.

Consolidated sales increased by 2.7% to $8,137 million. Excluding positive currency translation effects, the organic sales growth (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) was 2.2%, in line with global light vehicle production despite negative impact from lower inflator sales.

Airbag sales had solid organic growth (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) for the full year in Asia, especially in India, Japan and China. South America grew strongly while Europe and South Korea showed more modest organic growth. North American sales declined organically.

Seatbelt sales grew organically (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) for the full year in all regions except in North America and South Korea, with Europe and Japan as the largest growth drivers.

Inflator replacement sales affected the segment’s organic sales growth (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) for the full year negatively by around 0.4pp.

Sales by Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Components Of Change In

Net Sales

 

 

 

2017

Sales (MUSD)

 

 

2016

Sales (MUSD)

 

 

Reported

change

 

 

Currency

effects1)

 

 

Organic

 

Asia

 

$

2,998

 

 

$

2,831

 

 

 

5.9

%

 

 

(0.9

)%

 

 

6.8

%

Whereof: China

 

 

1,421

 

 

 

1,385

 

 

 

2.6

%

 

 

(1.6

)%

 

 

4.2

%

Japan

 

 

787

 

 

 

719

 

 

 

9.5

%

 

 

(3.3

)%

 

 

12.8

%

Rest of Asia

 

 

790

 

 

 

727

 

 

 

8.8

%

 

 

3.0

%

 

 

5.8

%

Americas

 

 

2,435

 

 

 

2,547

 

 

 

(4.4

)%

 

 

0.1

%

 

 

(4.5

)%

Europe

 

 

2,704

 

 

 

2,544

 

 

 

6.3

%

 

 

2.5

%

 

 

3.8

%

Global

 

$

8,137

 

 

$

7,922

 

 

 

2.7

%

 

 

0.5

%

 

 

2.2

%

1)

Effects from currency translations.

For the full year 2017, Autoliv’ sales grew organically (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) by 2.2% compared to full year 2016, in line with global LVP growth according to IHS. The largest contributors to the organic growth were Europe, Japan, and China, partly offset by North America and South Korea.

The organic sales increase (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) from Autoliv’s companies in China2021 was mainly driven by the global OEMs, primarily Renault/Nissan and Daimler, partly offset by Hyundai/Kia. Organic sales to the domestic OEMs also increased, with increases to models from Geely and Great Wall, partly offset by decreases to models from Haima. Inflator replacement sales contributed positively to organic sales growth.

Organic sales growth (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) from Autoliv’s companies in Japan was driven by Toyota, Renault/Nissan and Mitsubishi. Offsetting effects are mainly from decreasing inflator replacement sales.

Organic sales growth (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) from Autoliv’s companies in the Rest of Asia was driven by strong sales development in India, mainly to Suzuki and Hyundai/Kia. Sales in South Korea decreased, driven by Ssangyong and GM.

Sales from Autoliv’s companies in Americas declined organically (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) by 4.5%. North America declined by 6.0% organically, driven primarily by GM due to unfavorable platform shifts and declining LVP. Inflator replacement sales had a 0.7pp negative impact on organic growth in North America. South America grew organically by about 45%.


The 3.8% organic sales growth (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) from Autoliv’s companies in Europe was mainly driven by Volvo, Toyota and VW. Offsetting effects were mainly from Opel.

 

Years ended December 31

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions, except per share data)

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

Change

 

Net Sales

$

8,137

 

 

$

7,922

 

 

 

2.7

%

Gross profit

 

1,680

 

 

 

1,628

 

 

 

3.2

%

% of sales

 

20.6

%

 

 

20.6

%

 

 

0.0

pp

S,G&A

 

(407

)

 

 

(394

)

 

 

3.3

%

% of sales

 

(5.0

)%

 

 

(5.0

)%

 

 

0.0

pp

R,D&E net

 

(371

)

 

 

(357

)

 

 

3.9

%

% of sales

 

(4.6

)%

 

 

(4.5

)%

 

 

0.1

pp

Other income (expense), net

 

(32

)

 

 

(35

)

 

 

(8.6

)%

% of sales

 

(0.4

)%

 

 

(0.4

)%

 

 

(0.0

)pp

Operating income

 

860

 

 

 

831

 

 

 

3.5

%

% of sales

 

10.6

%

 

 

10.5

%

 

 

0.1

%

Interest expense, net

 

(54

)

 

 

(58

)

 

 

(6.9

)%

Income before taxes

 

792

 

 

 

784

 

 

 

1.0

%

Tax rate

 

25.8

%

 

 

28.6

%

 

 

(2.8

)pp

Net income attributable to controlling interest from Continuing

   Operations

 

586

 

 

 

558

 

 

 

5.0

%

Earnings per share Continuing Operations, diluted1, 2)

 

6.68

 

 

 

6.32

 

 

 

5.7

%

1)

Assuming dilution and net of treasury shares.

2)

Participating share awards with right to receive dividend equivalents are (under the two class method) excluded from the EPS calculation.

GROSS PROFIT

The gross profit for the full year 2017 increased by $52 million, compared to the prior year, as a result of higher sales. The gross margin was basically unchanged compared to 2016, as improved operational performance and higher organic sales (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures), were offset by costs related to investments for capacity and growth, as well as negative impact from raw material prices.

OPERATING INCOME

Operating income increased by around $29 million to $860 million and the operating margin increased slightly by 0.1pp to 10.6% compared to prior year. In 2017, the operating margin was negatively affected by the ongoing capacity alignments ($22 million), settlements of antitrust related matters ($18 million), higher RD&E, net, ($14 million) to support growth.

Selling, General and Administrative (S,G&A) expenses increased by $13 million compared to the prior year, but remained flat as a percentage of net sales. Research, Development & Engineering (R,D&E) expenses, net increased by $14 million compared to the prior year to support growth from prior year’s order intake.

INTEREST EXPENSE, NET

Interest expense, net decreased by $4 million to $54 million compared to 2016. The decrease relates to maturity of $105 million USPP in November 2017, and higher interest income on centrally held USD cash in 2017 compared to 2016.

INCOME TAXES

The effective tax rate in 2017 was 25.8% compared to 28.6% in 2016. The tax rate for 2017 excluding discrete tax items was 24.8% compared to 28.0% in 2016. The tax rate for 2017 was impacted by several items including, reversal of the valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets, reasonable estimate of the negative impact of U.S. tax reform (specifically the deemed repatriation of non-US earnings and the revaluation of U.S. deferred tax assets to the new lower U.S. tax rate) compared to the 2016 tax rate.

NET INCOME AND EARNINGS PER SHARE

Net income from continuing operations attributable to controlling interest was $586 million, an increase of $28 million from 2016. Earnings per share (EPS) assuming dilution increased by 36 cents, or by 6%, to $6.68 compared to prior year. The main positive items affecting EPS were lower number of shares, lower tax and higher operating income.

The weighted average number of shares outstanding assuming dilution declined to 87.7 million compared to 88.487.5 million in the full year 2016, mainly due to share repurchases.


2020.

37


Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures

In this annual report wethe Company sometimes referrefers to non-U.S. GAAP measures that wethe Company and securities analysts use in measuring Autoliv’s performance.

We believeThe Company believes that these measures assist investorsmanagement and managementinvestors in analyzing trends in the Company’s business for the reasons given below. Investors should not consider these non-U.S. GAAP measures as substitutes for, but rather as additions to, financial reporting measures prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

These non-U.S. GAAP measures have been identified, as applicable, in each section of this annual report with tabular presentations provided below, reconciling them to U.S. GAAP.

It should be noted that these measures, as defined, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

Organic Sales

ORGANIC SALES

We analyze the Company’sThe Company analyzes its sales trends and performance as changes in “organic sales growth” or “organic sales decline”, because the Company currently generates approximately three quarters of net sales in currencies other than the reporting currency (i.e. U.S. dollars) and currency rates have proven to be rather volatile. We also use organic sales to reflect the fact that the Company has made several acquisitions and divestitures.

Organic sales present the increase or decrease in the overall U.S. dollar net sales on a comparable basis, allowing separate discussions of the impact of acquisitions/divestitures and exchange rates.

The followingSee tabular reconciliation presentsreconciliations above, that present changes in “organic sales growth” as reconciled to the change in total U.S. GAAP net sales.

Trade working capital

COMPONENTS IN SALES INCREASE/DECREASE (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

 

 

China

 

 

Japan

 

 

RoA1)

 

 

Americas

 

 

Europe

 

 

Total

 

2018 VS. 2017

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

Reported change

 

 

7.1

 

 

$

101.0

 

 

 

5.2

 

 

$

40.9

 

 

 

6.9

 

 

$

54.9

 

 

 

12.3

 

 

$

299.9

 

 

 

1.7

 

 

$

44.7

 

 

 

6.7

 

 

$

541.4

 

Currency effects2)

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

30.9

 

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

12.8

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

10.9

 

 

 

(1.0

)

 

 

(24.2

)

 

 

4.5

 

 

 

119.9

 

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

150.3

 

Organic change

 

 

4.9

 

 

 

70.1

 

 

 

3.6

 

 

 

28.1

 

 

 

5.6

 

 

 

44.0

 

 

 

13.3

 

 

 

324.1

 

 

 

(2.8

)

 

 

(75.2

)

 

 

4.8

 

 

 

391.1

 

 

 

China

 

 

Japan

 

 

RoA1)

 

 

Americas

 

 

Europe

 

 

Total

 

2017 VS. 2016

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

Reported change

 

 

2.6

 

 

$

35.8

 

 

 

9.5

 

 

$

68.4

 

 

 

8.8

 

 

$

63.7

 

 

 

(4.4

)

 

$

(112.8

)

 

 

6.3

 

 

$

160.1

 

 

 

2.7

 

 

$

215.2

 

Currency effects2)

 

 

(1.6

)

 

 

(22.1

)

 

 

(3.3

)

 

 

(23.9

)

 

 

3.0

 

 

 

21.6

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

2.5

 

 

 

63.4

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

40.3

 

Organic change

 

 

4.2

 

 

 

57.9

 

 

 

12.8

 

 

 

92.3

 

 

 

5.8

 

 

 

42.1

 

 

 

(4.5

)

 

 

(114.1

)

 

 

3.8

 

 

 

96.7

 

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

174.9

 

1)

Rest of Asia.

2)

Effects from currency translations.

RECONCILIATION OF U.S. GAAP MEASURE TO “OPERATING WORKING CAPITAL” (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

DECEMBER 31

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Total current assets Continuing Operations

 

$

3,285.4

 

 

$

3,557.5

 

Total current liabilities Continuing Operations

 

 

(2,865.5

)

 

 

(2,086.4

)

Working capital

 

 

419.9

 

 

 

1,471.1

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(615.8

)

 

 

(959.5

)

Short-term debt

 

 

620.7

 

 

 

19.7

 

Derivative (asset) and liability, current

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

(2.1

)

Dividends payable

 

 

54.0

 

 

 

52.2

 

Operating working capital

 

$

478.0

 

 

$

581.4

 

RECONCILIATION OF U.S. GAAP MEASURE TO “NET DEBT” (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

DECEMBER 31

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Short-term debt

 

$

620.7

 

 

$

19.7

 

Long-term debt

 

 

1,609.0

 

 

 

1,310.7

 

Total debt

 

 

2,229.7

 

 

 

1,330.4

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(615.8

)

 

 

(959.5

)

Debt issuance cost/Debt-related derivatives, net

 

 

4.9

 

 

 

(2.5

)

Net debt

 

$

1,618.8

 

 

$

368.4

 


OPERATING WORKING CAPITAL

Due to the need to optimize cash generation to create value for ourthe Company's shareholders, management focuses on operationally derived trade working capital as defined in the table above.below.

The reconciling items used to derive this measure are, by contrast, managed as part of ourthe Company's overall management of cash and debt, but they are not part of the responsibilities of day-to-day operations’operations management.

Reconciliation of U.S. GAAP measure to “Trade working capital” (dollars in millions)

NET DEBT

DECEMBER 31

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Receivables, net

 

$

1,699

 

 

$

1,822

 

Inventories, net

 

 

777

 

 

 

798

 

Accounts payable

 

 

(1,144

)

 

 

(1,254

)

Trade working capital

 

$

1,332

 

 

$

1,366

 

Net debt

As part of efficiently managing the Company’s overall cost of funds, wethe Company routinely enter into “debt-related derivatives” (DRD) as part of ourits debt management.

Creditors and credit rating agencies use net debt adjusted for DRD in their analyses of the Company’s debt and therefore we providethe Company provides this non-U.S. GAAP measure. See reconciliation table below. DRD are fair value adjustments to the carrying value of the underlying debt. Also included in the DRD is the unamortized fair value adjustment related to discontinued fair value hedges, which will be amortized over the remaining life of the debt. By adjusting for DRD, the total financial liability of net debt is disclosed without grossing debt up with currency or interest fair values.

Reconciliation of U.S. GAAP measure to “Net debt” (dollars in millions)

ADJUSTED OPERATING MARGIN AND ADJUSTED

DECEMBER 31

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Short-term debt

 

$

346

 

 

$

302

 

Long-term debt

 

 

1,662

 

 

 

2,110

 

Total debt

 

 

2,008

 

 

 

2,411

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(969

)

 

 

(1,178

)

Debt issuance cost/Debt-related derivatives, net

 

 

13

 

 

 

(19

)

Net debt

 

$

1,052

 

 

$

1,214

 

38


Adjusted operating income, adjusted operating margin and adjusted EPS

Adjusted operating margin and adjusted EPS are non-GAAPnon-U.S. GAAP measures our managementthe Company uses to evaluate ourits business, because we believe they assistthe Company believes it assists investors and analysts in comparing ourthe Company's performance across reporting periods on a consistent basis by excluding items that are non-operational or non-recurring in nature (such as costs related to capacity alignments, costs related to antitrust matters separation costs, impairment charges and for EPS unusual tax items) and that we dothe Company does not believe are indicative of ourits core operating performance and underlying business trends. Adjusted operating margin and adjusted EPS, as shown in the table below, should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, other measures of financial performance reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP, including operating margin and EPS.

ITEMS AFFECTING COMPARABILITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT EPS)

 

Reported

(U.S.

GAAP)

 

 

Adjust-

ments1)

 

 

Non-

U.S.

GAAP

 

 

Reported

(U.S.

GAAP)

 

 

Adjust-

ments1)

 

 

Non-

U.S.

GAAP

 

 

Reported

(U.S.

GAAP)

 

 

Adjust-

ments1)

 

 

Non-

U.S.

GAAP

 

Operating income

 

$

686

 

 

$

222

 

 

$

908

 

 

$

860

 

 

$

40

 

 

$

900

 

 

$

831

 

 

$

35

 

 

$

866

 

Operating margin, %

 

 

7.9

 

 

 

2.6

 

 

 

10.5

 

 

 

10.6

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

11.1

 

 

 

10.5

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

10.9

 

Income before taxes from Continuing

   Operations

 

$

612

 

 

$

222

 

 

$

834

 

 

$

792

 

 

$

40

 

 

$

832

 

 

$

784

 

 

$

35

 

 

$

819

 

Net income attributable to controlling

   interest from Continuing Operations

 

$

376

 

 

$

220

 

 

$

596

 

 

$

586

 

 

$

39

 

 

$

625

 

 

$

558

 

 

$

27

 

 

$

585

 

Capital employed

 

$

3,516

 

 

$

220

 

 

$

3,736

 

 

$

4,538

 

 

$

39

 

 

$

4,577

 

 

$

4,225

 

 

$

27

 

 

$

4,252

 

Return on capital employed, % 2, 6)

 

 

16.8

 

 

 

5.2

 

 

 

22.0

 

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

Return on total equity, % 3, 6)

 

 

13.0

 

 

 

7.3

 

 

 

20.3

 

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

Earnings per share Continuing

   Operations, diluted 4, 5)

 

$

4.31

 

 

$

2.52

 

 

$

6.83

 

 

$

6.68

 

 

$

0.44

 

 

$

7.12

 

 

$

6.32

 

 

$

0.31

 

 

$

6.63

 

Total parent shareholders' equity per share

 

$

21.63

 

 

$

2.52

 

 

$

24.15

 

 

$

46.38

 

 

$

0.44

 

 

$

46.82

 

 

$

41.69

 

 

$

0.31

 

 

$

42.00

 

Items affecting comparability

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT EPS)

 

Reported

 

 

Adjust-
ments
1)

 

 

Non-
U.S.
GAAP

 

 

Reported

 

 

Adjust-
ments
1)

 

 

Non-
U.S.
GAAP

 

Operating income

 

$

675

 

 

$

8

 

 

$

683

 

 

$

382

 

 

$

99

 

 

$

482

 

Operating margin, %

 

 

8.2

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

8.3

 

 

 

5.1

 

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

6.5

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

614

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

622

 

 

 

291

 

 

 

99

 

 

 

391

 

Net income attributable to controlling interest

 

 

435

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

440

 

 

 

187

 

 

 

88

 

 

 

275

 

Capital employed

 

 

3,700

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

3,705

 

 

 

3,637

 

 

 

88

 

 

 

3,725

 

Return on capital employed, % 2)

 

 

18.3

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

18.5

 

 

 

10.4

 

 

 

2.5

 

 

 

12.9

 

Return on total equity, % 3)

 

 

17.1

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

17.3

 

 

 

8.8

 

 

 

3.9

 

 

 

12.7

 

Earnings per share, diluted 4, 5)

 

$

4.96

 

 

$

0.06

 

 

$

5.02

 

 

$

2.14

 

 

$

1.01

 

 

$

3.15

 

Total parent shareholders' equity per share

 

$

30.10

 

 

$

0.06

 

 

$

30.15

 

 

$

27.56

 

 

$

1.01

 

 

$

28.57

 

1)

Adjustments for capacity alignments and antitrust matters during 2016-2018 and separation of our business segments during 2018. See table below for a disaggregation of these costs.

2)

Operating income and income from equity method investments Continuing Operations, relative to average capital employed.

3)

Income from Continuing Operations relative to average total equity.

4)

Assuming dilution and net of treasury shares.

5)

Participating share awards with right to receive dividend equivalents are (under the two-class method) excluded from the EPS calculation.

6)

The Company has decided not to recalculate prior periods since the distribution of Veoneer had a significant impact on capital employed making the comparison less meaningful.


1) Represents costs for capacity alignments and antitrust related matters. See table below for a disaggregation of these costs.

2) Operating income and income from equity method investments, relative to average capital employed.

Items included in Non-GAAP adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full Year 2018

 

 

Full Year 2017

 

 

Full Year 2016

 

 

Adjustment

Millions

 

 

Adjustment

Per share

 

 

Adjustment

Millions

 

 

Adjustment

Per share

 

 

Adjustment

Millions

 

 

Adjustment

Per share

 

Capacity alignment

$

5

 

 

$

0.05

 

 

$

22

 

 

$

0.24

 

 

$

21

 

 

$

0.24

 

Antitrust related matters

 

212

 

 

 

2.43

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

0.21

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

0.16

 

Separation costs

 

5

 

 

 

0.06

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Total adjustments to operating income

$

222

 

 

$

2.54

 

 

$

40

 

 

$

0.45

 

 

$

35

 

 

$

0.40

 

Tax on non-U.S. GAAP adjustments1)

 

(2

)

 

 

(0.02

)

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(0.01

)

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(0.09

)

Total adjustments to Income from Continuing

   operations

$

220

 

 

$

2.52

 

 

$

39

 

 

$

0.44

 

 

$

27

 

 

$

0.31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of shares outstanding

   - diluted

 

 

 

 

 

87.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

87.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

88.4

 

Return on capital employed2, 3, 6)

$

222

 

 

 

 

 

 

n/a

 

 

 

 

 

 

n/a

 

 

 

 

 

Adjustment Return on Capital employed, %

 

5.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

n/a

 

 

 

 

 

 

n/a

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Return on total equity4, 5, 6)

$

220

 

 

 

 

 

 

n/a

 

 

 

 

 

 

n/a

 

 

 

 

 

Adjustment Return on Total equity, %

 

7.3

%

 

 

 

 

 

n/a

 

 

 

 

 

 

n/a

 

 

 

 

 

1)

The tax is calculated based on the tax laws in the respective jurisdiction(s) of the adjustment(s).

2)

After adjustment for annualized non-U.S. GAAP EBIT adjustment.

3)

Operating income and income from equity method investments Continuing Operations, relative to average capital employed.

4)

Income from Continuing Operations relative to average total equity.

5)

After adjustment for annualized non-U.S. GAAP Net income adjustment.

6)

The Company has decided not to recalculate prior periods since the distribution of Veoneer had significant impact on capital employed making the comparison less meaningful.

3) Net Income relative to average total equity for the year.

QUARTERLY 2018 RECONCILIATION OF ADJUSTED “OPERATING MARGIN” AND ADJUSTED “EPS”4) Assuming dilution and net of treasury shares.

5) Participating share awards with right to receive dividend equivalents are (under the two-class method) excluded from the EPS calculation.

 

 

First quarter 2018

 

 

Second quarter 2018

 

 

Third quarter 2018

 

 

Fourth quarter 2018

 

 

 

Reported

U.S. GAAP

 

 

Adjust-

ments1)

 

 

Non-

U.S. GAAP

 

 

Reported

U.S. GAAP

 

 

Adjust-

ments1)

 

 

Non-

U.S. GAAP

 

 

Reported

U.S. GAAP

 

 

Adjust-

ments1)

 

 

Non-

U.S. GAAP

 

 

Reported

U.S. GAAP

 

 

Adjust-

ments1)

 

 

Non-

U.S. GAAP

 

Operating

   margin, %

 

 

10.9

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

10.9

 

 

 

10.4

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

10.4

 

 

 

9.5

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

9.5

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

9.9

 

 

 

10.9

 

EPS Continuing

   operations,

   diluted2,3)

 

$

1.82

 

 

$

0.01

 

 

$

1.83

 

 

$

2.20

 

 

$

0.02

 

 

$

2.22

 

 

$

1.34

 

 

$

0.01

 

 

$

1.35

 

 

$

(1.06

)

 

$

2.48

 

 

$

1.42

 

1)

Adjustments for capacity alignments and antitrust matters and separation of our business segments.

2)

Assuming dilution and net of treasury shares.

3)

Participating share awards with right to receive dividend equivalents are (under the two class method) excluded from the EPS calculation.

Items included in Non-U.S. GAAP adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

Adjustment
Millions

 

 

Adjustment
Per share

 

 

Adjustment
Millions

 

 

Adjustment
Per share

 

Capacity alignment

 

$

8

 

 

$

0.10

 

 

$

99

 

 

$

1.13

 

Antitrust related matters

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

0.01

 

Total adjustments to Operating income

 

 

8

 

 

 

0.10

 

 

 

99

 

 

 

1.14

 

Tax on Non-U.S. GAAP adjustments1)

 

 

(3

)

 

 

(0.04

)

 

 

(11

)

 

 

(0.13

)

Total adjustments to Net Income

 

$

5

 

 

$

0.06

 

 

$

88

 

 

$

1.01

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of shares outstanding - diluted2)

 

 

 

 

 

87.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

87.5

 

Adjustment Return on capital employed

 

$

8

 

 

 

 

 

$

99

 

 

 

 

Adjustment Return on capital employed, %

 

 

0.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

2.5

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjustment Return on total equity

 

$

5

 

 

 

 

 

$

88

 

 

 

 

Adjustment Return on total equity, %

 

 

0.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

3.9

%

 

 

 

1) The tax is calculated based on the tax laws in the respective jurisdiction(s) of the adjustment(s).

2) Annualized average number of outstanding shares.

39


Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Position

 

Years ended December 31

 

 

Years ended December 31

 

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

$

591

 

 

$

936

 

 

$

868

 

 

$

754

 

$

849

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(628

)

 

 

(697

)

 

 

(726

)

 

(454

)

 

(340

)

Net cash used in financing activities

 

 

(245

)

 

 

(566

)

 

 

(200

)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

(469

)

 

160

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(62

)

 

 

60

 

 

 

(49

)

 

 

(39

)

 

 

64

 

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(344

)

 

 

(267

)

 

 

(107

)

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

(209

)

 

733

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

 

960

 

 

 

1,227

 

 

 

1,334

 

 

 

1,178

 

 

 

445

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 

$

616

 

 

$

960

 

 

$

1,227

 

 

$

970

 

$

1,178

 

NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Cash flow from operations, together with available financial resources and credit facilities, are expected to be sufficient to fund Autoliv’sthe Company’s anticipated working capital requirements, capital expenditures and future dividend payments. Cash flow items are presented on a consolidated basis including both Continuing and Discontinued Operations.


CashNet cash provided by operating activities was $591$754 million in 20182021 compared to $936$849 million in 2017 and $868 million in 2016.2020. The decrease compared to previous yearof $95 million was primarily relateddue to costs related to the separation of our business segments andnegative effects from changes in operating assets and liabilities due to increased sales. We estimate that for 2018 $806 millions ofworking capital partly offset by positive effects from the $591 million was attributable to Continuing Operations compared to $870 million of the $936 million for 2017 and $822 million of the $868 million in 2016.higher net income.

While management of cash and debt is important to the overall business, it is not part of the operational management’s day-to-day responsibilities. We therefore focus on operationally derivedAt December 31, 2021, trade working capital (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) and have set a policy that the operating working capital should not exceed 10% of the last 12-month net sales.

At December 31, 2018, operating working capital for Continuing Operations (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures)Measures above) amounted to $478$1,332 million corresponding to 5.5%16% of net sales compared to $581$1,366 million and 7.1%, respectively,14% at December 31, 2017, and compared2020.

Receivables outstanding in relation to $488 million and 6.2%, respectively, at December 31, 2016.

Days receivables outstandingsales (see Glossary and Definitions for definition) were 71 at20% December 31, 2018,2021, compared to 7618% in 2017 and 70 in 2016.2020. Factoring agreements did not have any material effectimpact on days receivables outstanding for 2018, 20172021 or 2016.2020.

Days inventory outstandingInventory in relation to sales (see Glossary and Definitions for definition) were 35 9%at December 31, 2018,2021, compared to 358% in 20172020.

Payables outstanding in relation to sales (see Glossary and 32Definitions for definition) were 14% at December 31, 2021 compared to 13% in 2016.2020.

NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES

In 2018, 20172021 and 20162020 net cash used in investing activities in both Continuing and Discontinued operations amounted to $628 million, $697 $454million and $726$340 million, respectively.

For 2018 $486 million of the $628 million was attributable to Continuing Operations compared to $465 million of the $697 million in 2017 and $399 million of the $726 million in 2016. OurThe Company's investing activities primarily consists of investments in property, plant and equipment, and acquisition of businesses, net of cash. For further information, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES

CashNet cash generated by operating activities continued to sufficiently cover capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment.

Capital expenditures, gross from in Continuing Operationsnet was $488$454 million in 2018, $4702021 and $340 million in 2017 and $4042020. The increase of $114 million mainly reflects that the level in 2016, correspondingthe prior year was still low due to 5.6%, 5.8%, and 5.1% ofthe pandemic. In relation to net sales, respectively.capital expenditures, net was 5.5% in 2021 and 4.6% in 2020.

Depreciation and amortization in Continuing Operations totaled $342$394 million in 20182021 compared to $307 million$371million in 2017 and $280 million in 2016.2020.

The projected capital expenditures as percent of sales, net, for the full year 2019 is expected to be lower than for full year 2018 of 5.6%.

During the years 2016 through 2018,2021 and 2020, a majority of the Company's investments inwere for production capacity to support further growthnew product launches and vertical integration continued.automation projects for improved efficiency. Major investments were mainly made in China, Europe and North AmericaAmerica.

In 2021, investments in China were made to support revenue growth and China.

to expand capacity and capabilities of textile production. In 2018, expansion of facilities in Europe was commenced for manufacturing of seatbelts and airbags to meet increased demand. In North America the higher investments were mainly related to production equipmentnew product launches and buildings to increase capacity for new program launches.automatizations. In addition, in China, largeNorth America, the investments were mademainly related to increase manufacturing capacity for airbag and seatbelt products.expansions.

NET CASH USED IN(USED IN) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Cash used inNet cash (used in) provided by financing activities amounted to $245 million, $566$(469) million and $200$160 million for the years 2018, 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively.

In 2018 the net issuance of debt amounted to $938 million, in 2017 net repayment of debt amounted to $209 million, and in 2016 net repayment of debt amounted to $3 million. In 2018,2021, the Company paid dividends of $214$165 million compared withafter reinstated the dividends in the second quarter of 2021. In 2020, the Company paid dividends of $209$54 million in 2017the first quarter and $203 million in 2016. In 2017then suspended the Company repurchased common shares amountingdividends due to $157 million.  In 2018, the Company capitalized Veoneer with $972 million prior to spin-off.COVID-19 pandemic for the remaining quarters.

INCOME TAXES

The Company has reserves for taxes that may become payable in future periods as a result of tax audits. At any given time, the Company is undergoing tax audits covering multiple years in several tax jurisdictions. Ultimate outcomes are uncertain but could, in future periods, have a significant impact on the Company’s cash flows. See discussions of income taxes under Significant Accounting Policies in this section, Note 2 and Note 65 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

40



PENSION ARRANGEMENTS

The Company has defined benefit pension plans covering nearly half of the U.S. employees. In a prior year, the Company froze participation in the U.S. plans to exclude employees hired afterAs of December 31, 2003.2021, the main U.S defined benefit plan was frozen for further benefits. Many of the Company’s non-U.S. employees are also covered by pension arrangements.

At December 31, 2018,2021, the Company’s net pension liability (i.e. the actual funded status) for its U.S. and non-U.S. plans was $198$197 million compared to $207$248 million one year earlier.at December 31, 2020. The plans had a net unamortized actuarial loss before tax of $82$68 million recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income in the Consolidated Statement of Equity at December 31, 2018,2021, compared to $92$107 million at December 31, 2017.2020. The decrease in the actuarial loss was mainly due to increasea decrease in the discount rate for the U.S. plans. The amortization of this loss is expected to be $2$1 million in 2019.2022.

The liability decrease in 2018the total net pension liability in 2021 of $9$51 million was mainly due to the increase in discount rates, partly offset by lower than expected plan assets return. The liability decrease in 2017 of $12 million was mainly due to the curtailment impact of the plan freeze in the U.S., partly offset by a decrease in the discount rate for many of the plans and foreign currency translation effects of the non-U.S. plans.rates.

Pension expense associated with the defined benefit plans was $20 million in 2018, $29 million in 2017 and $24 million in 20162021 and $33 million in 2020, and is expected to be $26$4 million in 2019.2022. The $9 million decrease in 2021 pension expense in 2018 of $9 million was mainly due to lower amortizationdiscount rates, a decrease in the cost of plan settlements in the U.S. and a higher expected return on assets due to the growth in the size of the unrecognized losses resulting from the amendment of the U.S. defined benefit plan. The increase in pension expense in 2017 of $5 million was mainly due to a prior year decrease in discount rates.assets.

The Company contributed $16$25 million to its defined benefit plans in 2018, $132021 and $26 million in 2017 and $13 million in 2016.2020. The Company expects to contribute $14$22 million to these plans in 20192022 and is currently projecting a yearly funding at approximately the same level in the subsequent years.

For further information about retirement plans see Note 2018 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

SHAREHOLDER RETURNS

Total cash dividends paid were $214$165 million in 2018, $2092021 and $54 million in 2017 and $203 million in 2016.2020. The Company has raisedcancelled its dividends from the dividend from 54 cents per share in 2015second quarter 2020 due to 62 cents per share in 2018 (see following table). The Board of Directors has declared a dividend of 62 cents per share for the first quarter and 62 cents per share forCOVID-19 pandemic. In the second quarter of 2019. The annualized dividend amount2021 the Board of $216 million, is based on 62 cents per share and the number of shares outstanding at December 31, 2018.Directors reinstated quarterly dividends.

The Company did not repurchase any shares during 2018. EQUITY

During the second quarter of 2017, the Company repurchased 1.4 million shares for cash of $157 million, including commissions. There were no share repurchases in 2016. In total, Autoliv has repurchased 44.5 million shares between May 2000 and December 2018 for cash of $2,498 million, including commissions. The maximum number of shares that are available to be purchased under the stock repurchase program at December 31, 2018 is 3.0 million. There is no expiration date for the share repurchase authorization in order to provide management flexibility in the Company’s share repurchases. For further information see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

DIVIDENDS PAID

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

 

2019

 

 

1st Quarter

 

$

0.54

 

 

$

0.56

 

 

$

0.58

 

 

$

0.60

 

 

$

0.62

 

1)

2nd Quarter

 

 

0.56

 

 

 

0.58

 

 

 

0.60

 

 

 

0.62

 

 

 

0.62

 

1)

3rd Quarter

 

 

0.56

 

 

 

0.58

 

 

 

0.60

 

 

 

0.62

 

 

 

 

 

 

4th Quarter

 

 

0.56

 

 

 

0.58

 

 

 

0.60

 

 

 

0.62

 

 

 

 

 

 

1)

Declared.

EQUITY

During 2018,2021, total equity decreasedincreased by 54.5% or $2,273$225 million to $1,897$2,648 million. ThisThe change was mainly due to $2,123 million related to the spin-off of Venoeer, $217 million in dividends and $150 million currency translation effects. The decrease was partly offset by $184$437 million from net income.income, partially offset by dividends of $166 million and $86 million from negative foreign exchange effects.

During 2017,TREASURY ACTIVITES

DEBT AND CREDIT ARRANGEMENTS

The Company's total equity increased by 6.2% or $243debt as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 was $2,008 million to $4,169 million. This was mainly due toand $2,411 million, respectively. The Company had a net income of $303 million, positive foreign currency translation adjustments of $272 million, $24 million due to changes in pension liabilities and a $19 million increase from stock based compensation. These effects were partly offset by $210 million for dividends and share repurchases of $157 million.

IMPACT OF INFLATION AND RAW MATERIAL PRICES

Inflation has generally not had a significant impact on the Company’s financialdebt position or results of operations. In many growth markets, inflation is relatively high, especially labor inflation. We have managed to offset this negative effect mainly by labor productivity improvements. However, no assurance can be given that this will continue to be possible going forward.

The Company has experienced headwind in raw material prices since 2017.


PERSONNEL

During the past three years, total headcount (permanent employees and temporary personnel) has risen by 11% from the beginning of 2016 to 66,764 at the end of 2018. This reflects the rebound in the cyclical automotive business as well as the combined effect of long-term growth of global LVP, strong demand for safer vehicles, technology development and Autoliv’s market share gains, which all drive the need for additional manufacturing and R,D&E personnel.

During 2018, headcount increased by 2,214 people, compared to 1,035 people during 2017. During 2016, headcount increased by 3,507 people. No acquisitions during the periods have affected the number of employees.

At the end of 2018, 80% of total headcount was in BCC compared to 78% at the beginning of 2017. Furthermore, 71% of total headcount(see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) at December 31, 20182021 and 2020 of $1,052 million and $1,214 million, respectively.

In June 2020, the Company utilized its new SEK 6,000 million facility with Swedish Export Credit Corporation which was direct workerssigned in manufacturing compared to 75% at the beginningMay 2020. The SEK 6,000 million facility was utilized in two different loans. One SEK 3,000 million loan maturing in 2022 carrying a floating interest rate of 2016, while 14%3M STIBOR +1.35% and one SEK 3,000 million loan maturing in 2025 carrying a floating interest rate of total headcount at December 31, 2018 were temporary employees, compared to 15% at the beginning of 2016.3M STIBOR +1.85%.

Compensation to directors and executive officers is reported, as is customary for U.S. public companies, in Autoliv’s proxy statement, which will be available to shareholders in March 2019.

Treasury Activities

CREDIT ARRANGEMENTS

In June 2018, the Company priced and issued 5-year notes for a total of €500 million in the Eurobond market. The notes carry a coupon of 0.75% and matures in 2023.

In July 2016, the Company refinanced its existing revolving credit facility (RCF) of $1,100 million. The facility, syndicated among 14 banks, originally maturing in July 2021 with two extension options, each for an additional year. The extension options have been used by the Company and the maturity date for the facility has been extended to July 2023. The Company pays a commitment fee on the undrawn amount of 0.08%0.1%, representing 35% of the applicable margin, which is 0.225%0.375% (given the Company’s rating of “A-”“BBB” from S&P Global Ratings at December 31, 2018))May 28, 2020). Borrowings under the facility are unsecured and bear interest based on the relevant LIBOR or IBOR rate.

At December 31, 2018,2021, the Company’s unutilized long-term credit facilities were $1.1 billion, represented by the RCF.RCF of $1,100 million was unutilized. This facility is not subject to any financial covenants nor is any other substantial financing of Autoliv. The Company had a net debt position (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) at year end 2018 and 2017 of $1,619 million and $368 million, respectively.

In 2014, the Company issued and sold $1.25 billion of long-term debt securities in a U.S. Private Placement pursuant to a Note Purchase and Guaranty Agreement dated April 23, 2014, by and among Autoliv ASP Inc., the Company and the purchasers listed therein. SeeAs of December 31, 2021, $767 million remains outstanding from the 2014 issuance.

The Company has a €3,000 million Euro Medium Term Note 12Program in place for being able to issue notes to be traded on the Global Exchange Market of Euronext Dublin. On December 31, 2021, no notes had been issued under this program.

At December 31, 2021,Autoliv’s long-term credit rating from S&P Global Ratings was BBB with stable outlook. The Company aims to maintain a strong investment grade credit rating.

For additional information about the Company's debt and credit arrangements, see Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein for additional information.herein.

41


FACTORING

During 20182021 and 2017,2020, the Company sold receivables and discounted notes related to selected customers. These factoring arrangements increase cash while reducing accounts receivable and customer risks. At December 31, 2018,2021, the Company had received $193$159 million for sold receivables without recourse and discounted notes with a discount cost of $6$2 million during the year, compared to $134$161 million at year end 2017December 31, 2020 with a discount cost of $3 million recorded in Other non-operating items, net.

Autoliv has a long-term credit rating from Standard and Poor’s of A- which is in line with the Company’s objective of maintaining a strong investment grade rating.

NUMBER OF SHARES

At December 31, 2018, 87.12021, 87.5 million shares were outstanding (net of 15.715.3 million treasury shares), a 0.2%0.1% increase from 87.087.4 million one year earlier.

The number of shares outstanding is expected to increase by 0.4 million when all Restricted Stock Units (RSU) and Performance Shares (PSs) vest and if all stock options (SOs) to key employees are exercised, see Note 1716 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

In total, Autoliv has repurchased 44.5 million shares under its stock repurchase program between May 2000 and December 20172021 for cash of $2,498 million, including commissions. The average cost per share for all repurchased shares to date is $56.13. No stock repurchases were made in 2021. Purchases can be made from time to time as market and business conditions warrant in open market, negotiated or block transactions. There is no expiration date forOn December 31, 2021, the stock repurchase program authorized by the Board of Directors in order2014 expired with approximately 3 million shares remaining. In November 2021, the Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program that authorizes the Company to provide management flexibility inrepurchase up to $1.5 billion or up to 17 million shares (whichever comes first) between January 2022 and the Company’s share repurchases. No stock repurchases were made in 2018.


end of 2024.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

AGGREGATE CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS1)

 

Payments due by Period

 

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

 

Total

 

 

Less than 1 year

 

 

1-3 years

 

 

3-5 years

 

 

More than 5 years

 

Debt obligations

 

$

2,235

 

 

$

621

 

 

$

275

 

 

$

573

 

 

$

767

 

Fixed-interest obligations

 

 

285

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

87

 

 

 

72

 

 

 

75

 

Operating lease obligations

 

 

186

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

65

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

33

 

Pension contribution requirements2)

 

 

14

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Other non-current liabilities reflected on the

   balance sheet

 

 

8

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

8

 

Total

 

$

2,728

 

 

$

727

 

 

$

427

 

 

$

691

 

 

$

883

 

1)

Excludes contingent liabilities arising from litigation, arbitration, regulatory actions or income taxes.

2)

Expected contributions for funded and unfunded defined benefit plans exclude payments beyond 2019.

Contractual obligations include debt, sponsored defined benefit plans, lease and purchase obligations that are enforceable and legally binding on the Company. Non-controlling interest and restructuring obligations are not included in this table. The major employee obligations as a result of restructuring are disclosed in Note 12 to Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

Debt obligations:For material contractual provisions,debt obligations as of December 31, 2021, see Note 1413 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

Fixed-interest obligations: These obligations include interest on debt and credit agreements relating to periods after December 31, 2018, excluding fees on the revolving credit facility and interest on debts with no defined amortization plan.

Operating lease obligations: The Companyobligations represent the payment obligations (undiscounted cash flows) under leases certain offices, manufacturing and research buildings, machinery, automobiles and data processing and other equipment. Suchclassified as operating leases, some of whichleases. Capital lease obligations are non-cancelable and include renewals, expire on various dates.not material. See Note 193 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

Unconditional purchase obligations:There are no unconditional purchase obligations other than short-term obligations related to inventory, services, tooling, and property, plant and equipment purchased in the ordinary course of business.

Purchase agreements with suppliers entered into in the ordinary course of business do not generally include fixed quantities. Quantities and delivery dates are established in “call off plans” accessible electronically for all customers and suppliers involved. Communicated “call off plans” for production material from suppliers are normally reflected in equivalent commitments from Autoliv customers.

Pension contribution requirements:The Company sponsors defined benefit plans that cover a significant portion of ourthe Company's U.S. employees and certain non-U.S. employees. The pension plans in the U.S. are funded in conformity with the minimum funding requirements of the Pension Protection Act of 2006. Funding for ourthe Company's pension plans in other countries is based upon plan provisions, actuarial recommendations and/or statutory requirements.

In 2019, the expected contribution to all plans, including direct payments to retirees, is $14 million, of which the major contribution is $7 million for our U.S. pension plans. Due to volatility associated with future changes in interest rates and plan asset returns, the Company cannot predict with reasonable reliability the timing and amounts of future funding requirements, and therefore the above excludes payments beyond 2019. Werequirements. The Company may elect to make contributions in excess of the minimum funding requirements for the U.S. plans in response to investment performance and changes in interest rates, or when we believethe Company believes that it is financially advantageous to do so and based on other capital requirements.

Excluded from the above are expected contributions of $0.4 million due in 2019 with respect to our other post-employment benefit (OPEB) plans, which represent the expected benefit payments to participants as costs are incurred. See Note 2018 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

Other non-current liabilities reflected on the balance sheet: These consist mainly of local governmental liabilities.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a material current or future effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Risks and Risk Management

The Company is exposed to several categories of risks. They can broadly be categorized as operational risks, strategic risks and financial risks. Some of the major risks in each category are described below. There are also other risks that could have a material effect on the Company’s results and financial position, and the description below is not complete but should be read in conjunction with the discussion of risks described in Item 1A above, which contains a description of ourthe Company's material risks.


As described below, the Company has taken several mitigating actions, applied numerous strategies, adopted policies, and introduced control and reporting systems to reduce and mitigate these risks. In addition, the Company from time to time identifies and evaluates emerging or changing risks to the Company in order to ensure that identified risks and related risk management are updated in this fast movingfast-moving environment.

42


Operational Risks

LIGHT VEHICLE PRODUCTION

Around 30% of Autoliv’s costs are fixed; therefore, short-term earnings are dependent on sales volumes and highly dependent on capacity utilization in the Company’s plants.

Global LVP is an indicator of the Company’s sales development. Ultimately, however, sales are determined by the production levels for the individual vehicle models for which Autoliv is a supplier (see Dependence on Customers). The Company’s sales are split over several hundred contracts covering approximately 1,300more than 1,100 vehicle models, thismodels. This moderates the effect of changes in vehicle demand of individual countries and regions as well as production issues. The risk of fluctuating sales has also been mitigated by Autoliv’s rapid expansion in Asia and other growth markets, which has reduced the Company’s former high dependence on sales in Europe to a diversified mix with Europe, the Americas and Asia each accounting for roughly 30% to 40% of our 2018the Company's 2021 total sales.

It is the Company’s strategy to reduce the risk of fluctuating LVP by using a high number of temporary employeespersonnel instead of permanent employeespersonnel in direct production. During 2018, 20172021 and 2016,2020, the level of temporary employeespersonnel in relation to total headcountpersonnel in direct production was 17%, 15%9% and 15%13%, respectively. To reduce the potential impact of unusual fluctuations in the production of vehicle models supplied by the Company such as during the financial crisis of 2008in 2008-2009 and 2009,the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020-2021 – it is also necessary for the Company to be prepared to quickly adapt the level of permanent employees as well as fixed cost production capacity.

PRICING PRESSURE

Pricing pressure from customers is an inherent part of the automotive components business. The extent of price reductions varies from year to year and takes the form of one time give backs, reductions in direct sales prices and/or discounted reimbursements for engineering work.

In response, Autoliv is continuously engaged in efforts to reduce costs and to provide customers added value by developing new products. Generally, the speed by which these cost-reduction programs generate results will, to a large extent, determine the future profitability of the Company. The various cost-reduction programs are, to a considerable extent, interrelated. This interrelationship makes it difficult to isolate the impact of costs on any single program, therefore, we monitorthe Company monitors key measures such as costs in relation to sales and productivity.

COMPONENT COSTS AND RAW MATERIAL PRICES

Changes in component costs and raw material prices could have a major impact on our margins, since theThe cost of direct materials was approximately 50%50% of sales in 2018.2021, of which approximately half is the raw material cost portion.

The main raw materials the Company requiresbeing used as input material for itsAutoliv operations are steel, textiles, plastic steel and non-ferrous metals. Worsening headwinds onmetals. The Company saw a significant inflation in 2021 with respect to rising raw materialsmaterial costs due to very high market prices. Semiconductor shortages hampered the global auto production and caused disturbances in 2018 were primarily caused by additionalthe second half of 2021. There are also supply chain difficulties related to freight capacity and import tariffs imposed by the United States on steel and aluminum products, other countries. The low schedule reliability in freight and the import tariffs and escalating trade conflictsare impacting the raw material marketsmarket and creating uncertainty.pricing and availability uncertainties.

We takeThe Company takes several actions to mitigate higher raw material prices,price increases, such as competitive sourcing and looking forexploring alternative materials. However, should these actions not be sufficient to offset component price increases, our earnings could be materially impacted.

LEGAL

The Company is involved from time to time in regulatory, commercial and contractual legal proceedings that may be significant, and the Company’s business may suffer as a result of adverse outcomes of current or future legal proceedings. These claims may include, without limitation, commercial or contractual disputes, including disputes with the Company’s suppliers and customers, intellectual property matters, alleged violations of laws, rules or regulations, governmental investigations, personal injury claims, product liability claims, environmental issues, tax and customs matters, and employment matters.

The Company is currently subject to an ongoing antitrust investigation by the European Commission, as well as civil litigation alleging anti-competitive conduct related to antitrust investigations concluded in various other jurisdictions. Regulatory actions and government investigations, such as these antitrust matters, may seek to impose significant fines and or limit the Company’s operations.  It is difficult for the Company to predict the possibility that such proceedings are initiated, and their ultimate outcome and duration. The EC previously concluded a discrete portion of its investigation in November 2017 and imposed a fine on the Company. In December 2018, we accrued $210 million based on our belief that the EC will seek to impose a fine in connection with the remaining portion of the EC’s investigation.

A substantial legal liability or adverse regulatory outcome and the substantial cost to defend the litigation or regulatory proceedings may have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results, financial condition, cash flows and reputation.


No assurances can be given that such proceedings and claims will not have a material adverse impact on the Company’s profitability and consolidated financial position, or that reserves or insurance will mitigate such impact. See Note 1817 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein and Item 3 – Legal Proceedings.

43


PRODUCT WARRANTY AND RECALLS

If our products are alleged to fail to perform as expected or are defective, the Company may be exposed to various claims for damages and compensation. Such claims may result in costs and other losses to the Company even where the relevant product is eventually found to have functioned properly. If a product (actually or allegedly) fails to perform as expected or is defective, we may face warranty and recall claims. If such actual or alleged failure or defect results, or is alleged to result, in bodily injury and/or property damage, we may also face product liability and other claims. The Company may experience material warranty, recall, product or other liability claims or losses in the future, and the Company may incur significant cost to defend against such claims. The Company may be required to participate in a recall involving its products. Each vehicle manufacturer has its own practices regarding product recalls and other product liability actions relating to its suppliers. Government safety regulators also have policies and practices with respect to recalls. As suppliers become more integrally involved in the vehicle design process and assume more of the vehicle assembly functions, vehicle manufacturers are increasingly looking to their suppliers for contribution when faced with recalls and product liability claims. In addition, with global platforms and procedures, vehicle manufacturers are increasingly evaluating our quality performance on a global basis. Any one or more quality, warranty or other recall issue(s), including the ones affecting few units and/or having a small financial impact, may cause a vehicle manufacturer to implement measures which may have a severe impact on the Company’s operations, such as a temporary or prolonged suspension of new orders or the Company’s ability to bid for new business.

In addition, over time, there is a risk that the number of vehicles affected by a failure or defect will increase significantly (as would the Company’s costs), since our products often use global designs and are increasingly based on or utilize the same or similar parts, components or solutions.

Although quality has always been a central focus in the automotive industry, especially for safety products, our customers and regulators have become increasingly attentive to quality with even less tolerance for any deviations, which has resulted in an increase in the number of automotive recalls. This trend is likely to continue as automobile manufacturers introduce even stricter quality requirements and regulating agencies and other authorities increase the level of scrutiny given to vehicle safety issues. A warranty recall or a product liability claim brought against the Company in excess of the Company’s insurance may have a material adverse effect on its business and/or financial results. Vehicle manufacturers are also increasingly requiring their external suppliers to guarantee or warrant their products and bear the costs of repair and replacement of such products under new vehicle warranties. A vehicle manufacturer may attempt to hold the Company responsible for some or all of the repair or replacement costs of defective products under new vehicle warranties when the product supplied did not perform as represented. Additionally, a customer may not allow us to bid for expiring or new business until certain remedial steps have been taken. Accordingly, the future costs of warranty claims by the Company’s customers may be material.

The Company’s warranty reserves are based upon management’s best estimates of amounts necessary to settle future and existing claims. Management regularly evaluates the appropriateness of these reserves and adjusts them when we believe it is appropriate to do so. However, the final amounts determined to be due could differ materially from the Company’s recorded estimates. We believe our established reserves are adequate to cover potential warranty settlements typically seen in our business.

The Company’s strategy is to follow a stringent procedure when developing new products and technologies and to apply a proactive “zero-defect” quality policy (see section Quality Management). In addition, the Company carriesmaintains a program of insurance, which may include commercial insurance, self-insurance, or a combination of both approaches, for potential recall and product liability claims at coverage levelsin amounts and on terms that managementit believes are generally sufficient to cover the risksreasonable and prudent based on the Company’sour prior claims experience. However, such insurance may not be sufficient to cover every possible claim that can arise in the Company’s businesses, now or in the future, or may not always will be available should the Company, now or in the future, wish to extend, renew, increase or otherwise adjust such insurance. In recent years, the cost of recall and product liability insurance as well as the Company’s level of self-insurance and deductibles has increased. Management’s decision regarding what insurance to procure is also impacted by the cost for such insurance. As a result, the Company may face material losses in excess of the insurance coverage procured. A substantial recall or liability in excess of coverage levels could therefore have a material adverse effect on the Company.

ENVIRONMENTAL

Most of the Company’s manufacturing processes consist of the assembly of components. As a result, the environmental impact from the Company’s plants is generally modest. While the Company’s businesses from time to time are subject to environmental investigations, there are no material environmental-related cases pending against the Company. Therefore, Autoliv does not incur (or expect to incur) any material costs or capital expenditures associated with maintaining facilities compliant with U.S. or non-U.S. environmental requirements. To reduce environmental risk, the Company has implemented an environmental management system in all plants globally and has adopted an environmental policy (see corporate website www.autoliv.com).

Autoliv is subject to a number of environmental and occupational health and safety laws and regulations. Such requirements are complex and are generally becoming more stringent over time. There can be no assurance that these requirements will not change in the future, or that wethe Company will at all times be in compliance with all such requirements and regulations, despite ourits intention to be. The Company may also find itself subject, possibly due to changes in legislation or other regulation, to environmental liabilities based on the activities of its predecessor entities or of businesses acquired. Such liability could be based on activities which are not related to the Company’s current activities.

TRADE

TRADE


Autoliv is subject to various international trade regulations and regimes and changes in these regimes could lead to increased compliance costs and costs of raw materials and other components. In addition, political conditions leading to trade conflicts and the imposition of tariffs or other trade barriers between countries in which we dothe Company does business could increase ourits costs of doing business.

44


Strategic Risks

REGULATIONS

In addition to vehicle production, the Company’s market is driven by the safety content per vehicle, which is affected by new regulations and new vehicle rating programs, in addition to consumer demand for new safety technologies.

The most important regulations are the seatbelt installation laws that exist in all vehicle-producing countries. Many countries also have strict enforcement laws on the wearing of seatbelts. Another significant vehicle safety regulation is the U.S. federal law that, since 1997, requires frontal airbags for both the driver and the front-seat passenger in all new vehicles sold in the U.S.

In 2007, the U.S. adopted new regulations for side-impacthead impact and enhanced thorax protection in side impact crashes, which now have been fully phased-in. China introduced a vehicle rating program in 2006 and during the past 15 years this China NCAP, together with the new additional rating program CIASI from 2019, drive Chinese vehicle safety performance and safety content with regards to crashworthiness and occupant protection. Latin America introduced a similarbasic rating program in 2010 followed by ASEAN NCAP in Southeast Asia in 2011. 2011, and Global NCAP that is rating vehicles sold in significant emerging markets like India. Several countries, e.g., Malaysia and Thailand, are increasingly adopting the UN Regulations regarding vehicle safety under the UN 1958 agreement, and Malaysia started a world first motorcycle safety rating program in 2021.

The United States upgraded its vehicle rating program in 2010 and Europe upgraded the Euro NCAP rating system during 2018. Euro NCAP has already initiated the nextis midway of a new upgrade, which will be fully implemented by 2025. Japan and South Korea are continuously upgrading their respective vehicle rating programs, JCAPJNCAP and KNCAP respectively. India requires frontal airbags for the driver from July 2019, and passenger airbags from 2021 for all new passenger vehicles (M1). Vehicles with automated driving systems (ADS) are expected to provide additional opportunities through integration of protective safety systems with ADAS technologies, as well as new vehicle interior layouts and seating configurations.

There are also other plans for improved automotive safety, both in these countries and many other countriesothers that could affect the Company’s market.

However, there can be no assurance that changes in regulations will not adversely affect the demand for the Company’s products or, at least, result in a slower increase in the demand for them.

DEPENDENCE ON CUSTOMERS

In 2018, the five largest vehicle manufacturers accounted for 49% of global LVP and the ten largest manufacturers for 74%.

As a result of this highly consolidated market, the Company is dependent on a relatively small number of customers with strong purchasing power.

In 2018,2021, the five largest vehicle manufacturers accounted for around 50% of global LVP and the ten largest manufacturers for around 73%. In 2021, the Company’s five largest customers accounted for 50%around 51% of revenues and the ten largest customers for 79%around 80% of revenues. For a list of the largest customers, see Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

Ourtotal sales. The Company's largest customer contract accounted for around 2% of sales in 2018. 2021.

Customer

 

% of Autoliv sales

 

 

% of Global LVP1)

 

Renault/Nissan/Mitsubishi

 

 

13

%

 

 

9

%

Stellantis

 

 

11

%

 

 

8

%

VW

 

 

10

%

 

 

11

%

Toyota

 

 

9

%

 

 

13

%

Honda

 

 

8

%

 

 

6

%

Hyundai

 

 

8

%

 

 

9

%

Ford

 

 

7

%

 

 

4

%

General Motors

 

 

6

%

 

 

5

%

BMW

 

 

4

%

 

 

3

%

Mercedes-Benz

 

 

4

%

 

 

3

%

1) Source: IHS Markit

Although business with every major customer is split into at least several contracts (usually one contract per vehicle platform) and although the customer base has become more balanced and diversified as a result of Autoliv’sthe Company's significant expansion in China and other rapidly-growing markets, the loss of all business from a major customer (whether by a cancellation of existing contracts or not awarding Autoliv new business), the consolidation of one or more major customers or a bankruptcy of a major customer could have a material adverse effect on the Company. In addition, a quality issue, shortcomings in ourthe Company's service to a customer or uncompetitive prices or products could result in the customer not awarding usthe Company new business, which will gradually have a negative impact on ourthe Company's sales when current contracts start to expire.

See also Note 20 Segment Information to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

CUSTOMER PAYMENT RISK

Another risk related to ourthe Company's customers is the risk that one or more of ourits customers will be unable to pay their invoices that become due. We seekThe Company seeks to limit this customer payment risk by invoicing ourits major customers through their local subsidiaries in each country, even for global contracts. By invoicing this way, we attemptthe Company attempts to avoid having the receivables with a multinational customer group exposed to the risk that a bankruptcy or similar event in one country would put all receivables with such customer group at risk. In each country, wethe Company also monitormonitors invoices becoming overdue.

Even so, if a major customer is unable to fulfill its payment obligations, it is likely that wethe Company would be forced to record a substantial loss on such receivables.

45


DEPENDENCE ON SUPPLIERS

Autoliv, at each stage of production,The Company relies on internal and/or external suppliers in order to meet its delivery commitments.commitments to the customers. In some cases, suppliers are dictated by the customers based on very specific qualification requirements. In other situations, the Company is dependent on a single supplier for a specific component. Supply chain management works to review and mitigate these risks in the supply base.

There is a natural risk that disruptions in theAutoliv supply chain could lead to the Company not being able to meet its delivery commitmentsorganization is reviewing sourcing risks and as a consequence, could lead to additional costs. actively working on mitigating related supply chain risks.

The Company’s strategyambition is to reduce these supplier risks by seeking to maintain an optimal number of suppliers in all significant component technologies, by standardization and by developing alternative suppliers around the world. However, for various reasons including costs involved in maintaining alternative suppliers, this is not always possible.


technologies.

NEW COMPETITION

Increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced margins and ourthe Company's inability to gain or hold market share. OEMs rigorously evaluate suppliers on the basis of product quality, price, reliability and delivery as well as engineering capabilities, technical expertise, product innovation, financial viability, application of lean principles, operational flexibility, customer service and overall management. To maintain ourthe Company's competitiveness and position as a market leader, it is important to focus on all of these aspects of supplier evaluation and selection.

Although the market for occupant restraint systems has undergone a significant consolidation during the past ten years, the passive safety market remains very competitive. It cannot be excluded that additional competitors, both global and local, will seek to enter the market or grow beyond their current Keiretsu group or traditional customer base. Particularly in China, South Korea and Japan there are numerous small domestic competitors often supplying just one OEM group.group

PATENTS AND PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGY

The Company’s strategy is to protect its innovations with patents, and to vigorously protect and defend its patents, trademarks and know-how against infringement and unauthorized use. At the end of 2018,2021, the Company held close to 6,050 patents.more than 6,400 patents and patents applications. These patents expire on various dates during the period from 20192022 to 2038.2041. The expiration of any single patent is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial results.

Although the Company believes that its products and technology do not infringe upon the proprietary rights of others, there can be no assurance that third parties will not assert infringement claims against the Company in the future. Also, there can be no assurance that any patent now owned by the Company will afford protection against competitors that develop similar technology. As the Company continues to expand its products and expand into new businesses, it will increase its exposure to intellectual property claims.

Financial Risks

The Company is exposed to financial risks through its operations. To reduce the financial risks and to take advantage of economies of scale, the Company has a central treasury department supporting operations and management. The treasury department handles external financial transactions and functions as the Company’s in-house bank for its subsidiaries.

The Board of Directors monitors compliance with the financial risk policy on an on-going basis. For information about specific financial risks, see Item 7A – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Significant Accounting Policies and Critical Accounting Estimates

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

The Company has considered all applicable recently issued accounting standards. The Company has summarized in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements each of the recently issued accounting standards and stated the impact or whether management is continuing to assess the impact. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein for additional information.

APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Company’s significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein. Senior management has discussed the development and selection of critical accounting estimates and disclosures with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The application of accounting policies necessarily requires judgments and the use of estimates by a Company’s management. Actual results could differ from these estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. These judgments are based on ourthe Company's historical experience, terms of existing contracts, and management’s evaluation of trends in the industry, information provided by ourthe Company's customers and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate. The Company considers an accounting estimate to be critical if:

It requires management to make assumptions about matters that were uncertain at the time of the estimate, and

Changes in the estimate or different estimates that could have been selected would have had a material impact on ourthe Company's financial condition or results of operations. The accounting estimates that require management’s most significant judgments include the estimation of retroactive price adjustments,variable considerations, estimations associated with purchase price allocations regarding business combinations, assessment of recoverability of goodwill and intangible assets, estimation of pension benefit obligations based on actuarial assumptions, estimation of accruals for warranty and product liabilities,recalls , restructuring charges, uncertain tax positions, valuation allowances and legal proceedings.

proceedings.

The Company has summarized its critical accounting policies requiring judgment below. These might change over time based on the current facts and circumstances.


46


REVENUE RECOGNITION

In accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, revenue is measured based on consideration specified in a contract with a customer, adjusted for any variable consideration (i.e. price concessions or annual price adjustments)concessions) and estimated at contract inception. The estimated amount of variable consideration that will be received by the Company are based on historical experience and trends, management´s understanding of the status of negotiations with customers and anticipated future pricing strategies. The Company recognizes revenue when it satisfies a performance obligation by transferring control over a product to a customer.

In addition, from time to time, Autolivthe Company may make payments to customers in connection with ongoing and future business. These payments to customers are generally recognized as a reduction to revenue at the time of the commitment to make these payments unless the payment concession can be clearly linked to the future business award. If the payments are capitalized, the amounts are amortized to revenue as the related goods are transferred.

INVENTORY RESERVES

Inventories are evaluated based on individual or, in some cases, groups of inventory items. Reserves are established to reduce the value of inventories to the lower of cost andor net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. Excess inventories are quantities of items that exceed anticipated sales or usage for a reasonable period. The Company has guidelines for calculating provisions for excess inventories based on the number of months of inventories on hand compared to anticipated sales or usage. Management uses its judgment to forecast sales or usage and to determine what constitutes a reasonable period.

There can be no assurance that the amount ultimately realized for inventories will not be materially different than that assumed in the calculation of the reserves.

GOODWILL

The Company performs an annual impairment reviewtest of goodwill in the fourth quarter of each year following the Company’s annual forecasting process. Management used a qualitative assessment approach for 2018 goodwill impairment testing purposes. When evaluating whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, an entity shall assess relevant events and circumstances. Examples of such events and circumstances include macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, overall financial performance etc.  Management has used the following approach:

1.

Determine the starting point

2.

Identify the most relevant drivers of fair value

3.

Identify events and circumstances

4.

Weight the identified factors

TheIn October 2021 the Company had significant head room from its latest fair value assessment performed in 2017, which determined the starting point.  The most relevant drivers of fair value for the Company is the expected future cash flows and the discount rate used. Considering the nature of the Company’s business with long production cycles and our strong credit rating as well as industry factors, management concluded that goodwill was not impaired.there were no impairments of goodwill. For further information, see Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

RECALL PROVISIONS AND WARRANTY OBLIGATIONS

The Company records liabilities for product recalls when probable claims are identified and when it is possible to reasonably estimate costs. Recall costs are costs incurred when the customer decides to formally recall a product due to a known or suspected safety concern. Product recall costs typically includeare estimated based on the expected cost of replacing the product and the customer´s cost of carrying out the recall, which is affected by the number of vehicles subject to recall and the cost of the product being replaced as well as the customer’s cost of the recall, including labor and materials to remove and replace the defective part. In some cases portionsproduct. The Company maintains a program of insurance, which may include commercial insurance, self-insurance, or a combination of both approaches, for potential recall and product liability claims in amounts and on terms that it believes are reasonable and prudent based on our prior claims experience. The Company’s insurance policies generally include coverage of the productcosts of a recall, although costs related to replacement parts are reimbursed by an insurance company.generally not covered. Actual costs incurred could differ from the amounts estimated, requiring adjustments to these reserves in future periods. It is possible that changes in our assumptions or future product recall issues could materially affect our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Estimating warranty obligations requires the Company to forecast the resolution of existing claims and expected future claims on products sold. The Company bases the estimate on historical trends of units sold and payment amounts, combined with our current understanding of the status of existing claims and discussions with our customers. These estimates are re-evaluated on an ongoing basis. Actual warranty obligations could differ from the amounts estimated requiring adjustments to existing reserves in future periods. Due to the uncertainty and potential volatility of the factors contributing to developing these estimates, changes in our assumptions could materially affect our results of operations.

RESTRUCTURING PROVISIONS

The Company defines restructuring expense to include costs directly associated with capacity alignment programs, plus exit or disposal activities. Estimates of restructuring charges are based on information available at the time such charges are recorded. In general, management anticipates that restructuring activities will be completed within a time frame such that significant changes to the exit plan are not likely.


Due to inherent uncertainty involved in estimating restructuring expenses, actual amounts paid for such activities may differ from amounts initially estimated.

47


DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS

The Company has defined benefit pension plans in eleventhirteen countries. The most significant plans exist in the U.S. These U.S. plans represent approximately 60%59% of the Company’s total pension benefit obligation. See Note 2018, Retirement Plans to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

The Company, in consultation with its actuarial advisors, determines certain key assumptions to be used in calculating the projected benefit obligation and annual pension expense. For the U.S. plans, the assumptions used for calculating the 20182021 pension expense were a discount rate of 3.55%2.37%, expected rate of increase in compensation levels of 2.65%, and an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 7.08%5.05%.

The assumptions used in calculating the U.S. benefit obligations disclosed as of December 31, 20182021 were a discount rate of 4.35%2.77% and an expected age-based rate of increase in compensation levels of 2.65%. The discount rate for the U.S. plans has been set based on the rates of return of high-quality fixed-income investments currently available at the measurement date and are expected to be available during the period the benefits will be paid. The expected rate of increase in compensation levels and long-term return on plan assets are determined based on a number of factors and must take into account long-term expectations and reflect the financial environment in the respective local markets. At December 31, 2018, 38%2021, 42% of the U.S. plan assets were invested in equities, which is in linein-line with the target of 40%.

The table below illustrates the sensitivity of the U.S. net periodic benefit cost and projected U.S. benefit obligation to a 1pp change in the discount rate, decrease in return on plan assets and increase in compensation levels for the U.S. plans (in millions). The use of actuarial assumptions is an area of management’s estimate.

 

 

 

2018 net

 

 

2018 projected

 

 

 

 

periodic benefit

 

 

benefit obligation

 

Assumption

 

 

 

cost increase

 

 

increase

 

(in millions)

 

Change

 

(decrease)

 

 

(decrease)

 

Assumption
(in millions)

 

Change

 

2021 net
periodic
benefit
cost increase
(decrease)

 

 

2021 projected
benefit
obligation
increase
(decrease)

 

Discount rate

 

1pp increase

 

$

(3

)

 

$

(51

)

 

1pp increase

 

$

1

 

$

(34

)

Discount rate

 

1pp decrease

 

$

7

 

 

$

65

 

 

1pp decrease

 

2

 

41

 

Compensation levels

 

1pp increase

 

$

0

 

 

$

3

 

 

1pp increase

 

0

 

0

 

Return on plan assets

 

1pp decrease

 

$

3

 

 

n/a

 

 

1pp decrease

 

4

 

n/a

 

INCOME TAXES

Significant judgment is required in determining the worldwide provision for income taxes. In the ordinary course of a global business, there are many transactions for which the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. Many of these uncertainties arise as a consequence of intercompany transactions.

Although the Company believes that its tax return positions are supportable, no assurance can be given that the final outcome of these matters will not be materially different than that which is reflected in the historical income tax provisions and accruals. Such differences could have a material effect on the income tax provisions or benefits in the periods in which such determinations are made. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) was enacted on December 22, 2017. The Tax Act makes broad and complex changes to the U.S. tax code, including reducing the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% for years beginning after December 31, 2017, requiring

companies to pay a one-time transition tax on earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that were previously deferred and created new taxes on certain foreign sourced earnings. See also the discussion of the Tax Actreserves for uncertain tax positions, and the determinations of valuation allowances on ourthe Company's deferred tax assets in Note 65, Income Taxes.Taxes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Various claims, lawsuits and proceedings are pending or threatened against the Company or its subsidiaries, covering a range of matters that arise in the ordinary course of its business activities with respect to commercial, product liability or other matters.

The Company diligently defends itself in such matters and, in addition, carries insurance coverage to the extent reasonably available against insurable risks.

The Company records liabilities for claims, lawsuits and proceedings when they are probable and it is possible to reasonably estimate the cost of such liabilities. Legal costs expected to be incurred in connection with a loss contingency are expensed as such costs are incurred.

A loss contingency is accrued by a charge to income if it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. In determining whether a loss should be accrued management evaluates, among other factors, the degree of probability of an unfavorable outcome and the ability to make a reasonable estimate of the amount of loss. Changes in these factors could materially impact ourthe Company's consolidated financial statements.


48


Item 7A. Quantitative and QualitativeQualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The Company is exposed to several markets risks in the ordinary course of business including risks related to currencies, interest rates, financing, capital structure and credit ratings and impairment. See also Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the Consolidated Financial Statements ofincluded with this Annual Report included with this Form 10-K for information about how these risks are quantified.

CURRENCY RISKS

1. Transaction Exposure and Revaluation effects

Transaction exposure arises because the cost of a product originates in one currency and the product is sold in another currency. Revaluation effects come from valuation of assets denominated in other currencies than the reporting currency of each unit.

The Company’s grossCompany's net transaction exposure for 2018in 2021 was approximately $2.9 billion. A part of the currency flows had counter-flows in the same currency pair, which reduced the net exposure to approximately $2.4$2.3 billion. The four largest net exposures are U.S. dollarsdollar (sell) against the the Mexican Peso, Romanian Lei (buy) against the Euro, U.S. dollars (buy) against Korean Won, Turkish Liradollar (buy) against the Euro.Korean Won and U.S. dollar (sell) against the Canadian dollar. Together these currencies accounted for approximately 39%50% of the Company’sCompany's net currency transaction exposure.

Since the Company can only effectively hedge these currency flows in the short term, periodic hedging would only reduce the impact of fluctuations temporarily. Over time, periodic hedging would postpone but not reduce the impact of fluctuations. In addition, the net exposure is limited to only around one quarter of net sales and is made up of around 50 different currency pairs with exposures of more than of $1 million each. AutolivThe Company generally does not hedge these flows.

2. Translation Exposure in the Income Statement and Balance Sheet

Another effect of exchange rate fluctuations arises when the income statements of non-U.S. subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars. Outside the U.S., the Company’s most significant currency is the Euro. We estimateThe Company estimates that 29% of the Company’sits net sales will be denominated in Euro or other European currencies during 2018,2022, while approximately a quarter19% of net sales is estimated to be denominated in U.S. dollars.

The Company estimates that a 1% increase in the value of the U.S. dollar versus European currencies will decrease reported U.S. dollar annual net sales in 20192022 by $27$28 million or by 0.3%, while operating income for 20192022 will decline by approximately 0.3% or by about $3 million, assuming reported corporate average margin.

The Company’s policy is not to hedge this type of translation exposure since there is no cash flow effect to hedge.exposure.

A translation exposure also arises when the balance sheets of non-U.S. subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars. The policy of the Company is to finance major subsidiaries in the country’s local currency and to minimize the amounts held by subsidiaries in foreign currency accounts.

Consequently, changes in currency rates relating to funding and foreign currency accounts normally have a small impact on the Company’s income. In 2021 and 2020, the impact from the Company’s currency exposure were not material.

INTEREST RATE RISK

Interest rate risk refers to the risk that interest rate changes will affect the Company’s borrowing costs. Autoliv’s interest rate risk policy states that the average interest rate fixing period should be minimum 1 year and maximum 5 years.

At December 31, 2018,2021, the average interest rate fixing period for the Company’s outstanding debt was 4.02.1 years, and at December 31, 2020, the average interest rate fixing period for the Company’s outstanding debt was 2.4 years.

Given the Company’s current capital structure, we estimatethe Company estimates that a one-percentage point interest rate increase would reducedecrease net interest expense by approximately $3$2.9 million both in 2019 and 2020.2022. This is based on the capital structure at the end of 20182021 when the gross fixed-rate debt was $1,883$1,330 million while the Company had a net debt position of $1,619$1,052 million (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures). Thus, a change in the interest rate environment would not have a notable impact on the Company’s interest expense. As of December 31, 2018,2021, the Company had $616$969 million in cash and cash equivalents of which the majority were subject to a floating interest rate. Taking the cash and cash equivalents of $616$969 million (which is primarily subject to floating interest rates) minus the portion of debt carrying floating interest rates, wethe Company estimated that a one-percentage point interest rate increase would increase interest income and thereby reducedecrease net interest expense by approximately $3$2.9 million, both in 20192022 and 2020.2023.

Fixed interest rate debt is achieved both by issuing fixed rate notes and through interest rate swaps. The most notable debt carrying fixed interest rates is the $1.3 billion$767 million U.S. private placement notes issued in 2014 and in June 2018, the Company issued EUR 500€500 million of 5-year notes in the Eurobond market,market. For additional information, see Note 1413 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.


49


FINANCING RISK

Financing risk refers to the risk that it will be difficult and/or expensive to finance new or existing debt to meet the financing needs of the Autoliv Group.

The management of the financing risk ensures access to funding in a cost-efficient way by diversification of funding sources and debt maturities.

Autoliv has diversified its long-term funding sources by issuing notes in the USPP and Eurobond markets, and by signing a long-term credit agreement with 14 banks. The Company also has a lending facility with the Swedish Export Credit Corporation.

The Company has Medium Term Note Program in place for being able to issue notes to be traded on the Global Exchange Market of Euronext Dublin. The Company also has established programs for short-term issuance of commercial paperspaper in the Swedish and US markets and short-term credit agreements, e.g. bank overdrafts and money market loans.

To ensure diversification of debt maturities, no more than 20% of the Autoliv Group’s total debt may mature the next 12 months, unless such maturities (in excess of 20%) are covered by unutilized committed credit facilities with maturity in excess of 12 months. Per December 31, 2018, 28%2021, 17% corresponding to $621$346 million of the Autoliv Group’s total debt had maturity less than 12 months. This amount was fully covered by unutilized committed credit facilities with maturity in excess of 12 months.

CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND CREDIT RATING

The overall objective relating to Autoliv’s target capital structure and credit rating is to provide the Company with sufficient flexibility to manage the inherent risks and cyclicality in Autoliv’s business and allow the Company to realize strategic opportunities and fund growth initiatives while creating shareholder value.

Autoliv is committed to maintain a “strong investment grade credit rating”.rating." As of December 31, 20182021, the Company had a long-term credit rating from S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”) of A-.BBB.

The amount of interest-bearing debt held impacts the future financial flexibility as well as the credit rating. Management uses the non-U.S. GAAP measure “Leverage Ratio” to analyze the amount of debt the Company can incur under its debt policy. Management believes that this policy also provides guidance to credit and equity investors regarding the extent to which the Company would be prepared to leverage its operations. Autoliv’s long-term target for the leverage ratio (sum of net debt plus pension liabilities divided by EBITDA) is 1.0x with the aim to operate within the range of 0.5x to 1.5x. At December 31, 2018,2021, the leverage ratio (non-U.S. GAAP measure, see calculation table below) was 1.5x.1.2x. For details and calculation of leverage ratio, refer to the table below.

CALCULATION OF LEVERAGE RATIO (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31 2018

 

 

December 31 2017

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Net debt1)

 

$

1,618.8

 

 

$

368.4

 

 

$

1,052

 

$

1,214

 

Pension liabilities

 

 

198.2

 

 

 

206.8

 

 

 

197

 

 

 

248

 

Debt per the Policy

 

 

1,817.0

 

 

 

575.2

 

 

1,248

 

1,462

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income2)

 

 

183.7

 

 

 

303.0

 

 

437

 

188

 

Less; Net Loss, Discontinued Operations2)

 

 

193.8

 

 

 

285.0

 

Net income, Continuing Operations2)

 

 

377.5

 

 

 

588.0

 

Income taxes2)

 

 

234.9

 

 

 

204.4

 

 

177

 

103

 

Interest expense, net2, 3)

 

 

59.2

 

 

 

53.7

 

Interest expense, net2,3)

 

57

 

68

 

Other non-operating items, net2)

 

7

 

25

 

Income from equity method investments2)

 

(3

)

 

(2

)

Depreciation and amortization of intangibles2)

 

 

342.0

 

 

 

307.0

 

 

394

 

371

 

Antitrust related matters2)

 

 

212.0

 

 

 

18.0

 

EBITDA per the Policy

 

$

1,225.6

 

 

$

1,171.1

 

Capacity alignments costs and antitrust related matters2)

 

 

8

 

 

 

99

 

EBITDA per the Policy (Adjusted EBITDA)

 

$

1,077

 

$

852

 

Leverage ratio

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

1.2

 

1.7

 

1)

Net debt is short- and long-term debt and debt-related derivatives less cash and cash equivalents (non-U.S. GAAP measure).

2)

Latest 12 months.

3)

Interest expense, net is interest expense including cost for extinguishment of debt, if any, less interest income.

1) Net debt is short- and long-term debt and debt-related derivatives less cash and cash equivalents (non-U.S. GAAP measure).

2) Latest 12 months.

3) Interest expense, net is interest expense including cost for extinguishment of debt, if any, less interest income.

50


CREDIT RISK IN FINANCIAL MARKETS

Credit risk refers to the risk of a financial counterparty being unable to fulfill an agreed-upon obligation.

In the Company’s financial operations, thiscredit risk arises when cash is deposited with banks and when entering into forward exchange agreements, swap contracts or other financial instruments.

The policy of the Company is to work with banks that have a high credit rating and that participate in Autoliv’s financing.


To further reduce credit risk, deposits and financial instruments can only be entered into with core banks up to a calculated risk amount of $150$200 million per bank for banks rated A- or above and up to $50 million for banks rated BBB+. In addition, deposits can be made in U.S. and Swedish government short- termshort-term notes and certain AAA rated money market funds, as approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. At year-end 2018,December 31, 2021, the Company held $1$579 million in AAA rated money market funds.

IMPAIRMENT RISK

Impairment risk refers to the risk that the Company will write down a material amount of its goodwill of close to $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2018.2021. This risk is assessed at least annually in the fourth quarter each year when the Company performs its impairment testing.

In 2018,2021, the Company performed a qualitative method has been used for determining whether therequantitative impairment testing by calculating the fair value of its goodwill. The estimated fair market value of goodwill is any impairment risk. Both historical datadetermined by the discounted cash flow method. The Company discounts projected operating cash flows using its weighted average cost of capital. Estimating the fair value requires the Company to make judgments about appropriate discount rates, growth rates, relevant comparable company earnings multiples and forecasts have been used to assess the impairment risk.amount and timing of expected future cash flows.

It has been concluded that presently the Company is not “at risk” of failing the goodwill impairment test. However, there can be no assurance that goodwill will not be impaired due to future significant declines in LVP, due to ourthe Company's technologies or products becoming obsolete or for any other reason. WeThe Company could also acquire companies where goodwill could turn out to be less resilient to deteriorations in external conditions. See also discussion under Goodwill and Intangible Assets in Note 2 and Note 1110 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The Consolidated Balance Sheets of Autoliv as of December 31, 20182021 and 20172020 and the Consolidated Statements of Net Income, Comprehensive Income, Cash Flows and Total Equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2021, the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, and the Reports of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm are included below.

All of the schedules specified under Regulation S-X to be provided by Autoliv have been omitted either because they are not applicable, are not required or the information required is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.


51


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Autoliv, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Autoliv, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017, and2020, the related consolidated statements of net income, comprehensive income, total equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2021, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 21, 201922, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

52


Revenue recognition – Variable consideration

Description of the
Matter

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company measures revenue based on consideration specified in a contract with a customer, adjusted for any variable consideration. Variability in consideration typically results from price concessions. The estimated amount of variable consideration that will be received by the Company is based on assumptions that include historical experience and trends, management’s assessment of the probable outcome of its negotiations with customers and anticipated future pricing strategies. Estimating variable consideration to be received requires significant judgments by management that affect the amount of revenue recorded in the financial statements.

Auditing the amount of variable consideration expected to be received was complex because of the uncertainty inherent in the factors discussed above that management uses in its calculations.

How We
Addressed the
Matter in Our Audit

We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of internal controls related to variable consideration, including controls related to management’s review of ongoing negotiations with customers.

To test the estimated amount of variable consideration expected to be received, our audit procedures included, among others, evaluating the Company’s estimation methodology and testing the significant factors used in the calculations, as discussed above. These procedures included obtaining information from management and sales department representatives who were responsible for negotiations with customers to assess the reasonableness of assumptions related to variable considerations relative to current negotiations. We evaluated the Company’s ability to estimate by comparing actual results to previous estimates and judgments made by management. We also performed journal entry testing focused on unusual and manual entries affecting revenue and on entries that could be indicative of price concessions that may not have been considered in the Company’s assumptions and calculations.

53


Product recalls

Description of the
Matter

As discussed in Notes 2 and 12 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company is exposed to product liability claims in the event its products fail to perform as represented and such failure results, or is alleged to result, in bodily injury, and/or property damage or other loss. The Company records liabilities for product recalls when probable claims are identified and when it is possible to reasonably estimate costs. Actual costs incurred could differ from the amounts estimated, requiring adjustments to these reserves in future periods. Provisions for product recalls are estimated based on the expected cost of replacing the product and the customer’s cost of carrying out the recall, which is affected by the number of vehicles subject to recall and the cost of labor and materials to remove and replace the defective product.

Auditing the product recall liabilities was complex due to the uncertainty inherent in the assumptions and estimates management uses to calculate these liability balances. These significant assumptions and estimates include the nature, likelihood, timing, and anticipated cost of known and potential claims.

How We
Addressed the
Matter in Our Audit

We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of internal controls over the Company’s product recall process, including controls related to management’s review of the estimation calculations and significant assumptions discussed above.

To test product recall liabilities, our audit procedures included, among others, evaluating the Company’s estimation methodology and testing the significant assumptions discussed above. We obtained information from Company personnel who are responsible for monitoring the status of product recalls with customers to assess the reasonableness of assumptions used. We evaluated the Company’s ability to estimate by comparing actual results to previous estimates and judgments made by management. We also obtained letters from the Company’s external legal counsel addressing material claims against the Company, if any, and examined relevant third-party automotive safety regulatory information to identify potential unrecorded product recall liabilities.

/ s /s/ Ernst & Young AB

We have served as the Company´s auditor since 1984.

Stockholm, Sweden

February 21, 201922, 2022


54


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Autoliv, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Autoliv, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Autoliv, Inc. (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2021, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of Autoliv, Inc.the Company as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, the related consolidated statements of net income, comprehensive income, total equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2021, and the related notes and our report dated February 21, 201922, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/ s /s/ Ernst & Young AB

Stockholm, Sweden

February 21, 201922, 2022


55


Consolidated StatementsStatements of Net Income

 

 

 

Years ended December 31

 

 

 

 

Years ended December 31

 

(DOLLARS AND SHARES IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Net sales

 

Note 22

 

$

8,678.2

 

 

$

8,136.8

 

 

$

7,921.6

 

 

Note 20

 

$

8,230

 

$

7,447

 

$

8,548

 

Cost of sales

 

 

 

 

(6,966.9

)

 

 

(6,457.1

)

 

 

(6,293.6

)

 

 

 

 

(6,719

)

 

 

(6,201

)

 

 

(6,963

)

Gross profit

 

 

 

 

1,711.3

 

 

 

1,679.7

 

 

 

1,628.0

 

 

 

 

1,511

 

1,247

 

1,584

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

 

 

(390.3

)

 

 

(406.6

)

 

 

(394.4

)

 

 

 

(432

)

 

(389

)

 

(399

)

Research, development and engineering expenses, net

 

 

 

 

(412.6

)

 

 

(370.6

)

 

 

(357.3

)

 

 

 

(391

)

 

(376

)

 

(406

)

Amortization of intangibles

 

Note 11

 

 

(11.3

)

 

 

(11.2

)

 

 

(10.5

)

 

Note 10

 

(10

)

 

(10

)

 

(12

)

Other income (expense), net

 

Notes 12, 18

 

 

(211.1

)

 

 

(31.7

)

 

 

(34.8

)

 

Notes 11, 17

 

 

(3

)

 

 

(90

)

 

 

(43

)

Operating income

 

 

 

 

686.0

 

 

 

859.6

 

 

 

831.0

 

 

 

 

675

 

382

 

726

 

Income from equity method investments

 

Note 9

 

 

3.6

 

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

2.6

 

Income from equity method investment

 

Note 8

 

3

 

2

 

2

 

Interest income

 

 

 

 

6.9

 

 

 

7.4

 

 

 

4.5

 

 

 

 

4

 

5

 

4

 

Interest expense

 

Note 14

 

 

(66.1

)

 

 

(61.1

)

 

 

(62.2

)

 

Note 13

 

(60

)

 

(73

)

 

(70

)

Other non-operating items, net

 

 

 

 

(18.0

)

 

 

(15.2

)

 

 

8.3

 

 

 

 

 

(7

)

 

 

(25

)

 

 

(14

)

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

 

 

 

 

612.4

 

 

 

792.4

 

 

 

784.2

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

 

614

 

 

 

291

 

648

 

Income tax expense

 

Note 6

 

 

(234.9

)

 

 

(204.4

)

 

 

(224.3

)

 

Note 5

 

 

(177

)

 

 

(103

)

 

 

(186

)

Income from continuing operations

 

 

 

 

377.5

 

 

 

588.0

 

 

 

559.9

 

(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

 

Note 3

 

 

(193.8

)

 

 

(285.0

)

 

 

1.7

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

183.7

 

 

 

303.0

 

 

 

561.6

 

 

 

 

437

 

188

 

463

 

Less: Net income from continuing operations attributable to

non-controlling interest

 

 

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

 

1.5

 

Less: Net loss from discontinued operations attributable to

non-controlling interest

 

 

 

 

(8.3

)

 

 

(126.1

)

 

 

(7.0

)

Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Net income attributable to controlling interest

 

 

 

$

190.4

 

 

$

427.1

 

 

$

567.1

 

 

 

 

$

435

 

$

187

 

 

$

462

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts attributable to controlling interest:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income from continuing operations

 

 

 

$

375.9

 

 

$

586.0

 

 

$

558.4

 

Net (Loss) income from discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

(185.5

)

 

 

(158.9

)

 

 

8.7

 

Net income attributable to controlling interest

 

 

 

$

190.4

 

 

$

427.1

 

 

$

567.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share continuing operations - basic1)

 

 

 

$

4.32

 

 

$

6.70

 

 

$

6.33

 

(Loss) earnings per share discontinuing operations - basic1)

 

 

 

 

(2.13

)

 

 

(1.82

)

 

 

0.10

 

Basic earnings per share

 

 

 

$

2.19

 

 

$

4.88

 

 

$

6.43

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share continuing operations - diluted 1)

 

 

 

$

4.31

 

 

$

6.68

 

 

$

6.32

 

(Loss) earnings per share discontinuing operations - diluted 1)

 

 

 

$

(2.13

)

 

$

(1.81

)

 

$

0.10

 

Diluted earnings per share

 

 

 

$

2.18

 

 

$

4.87

 

 

$

6.42

 

Earnings per share - basic1)

 

 

 

$

4.97

 

$

2.14

 

 

$

5.29

 

Earnings per share - diluted 1)

 

 

 

$

4.96

 

 

$

2.14

 

 

$

5.29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of shares outstanding, net of

treasury shares (in millions)

 

 

 

 

87.1

 

 

 

87.5

 

 

 

88.2

 

 

 

 

87.5

 

 

 

87.3

 

 

 

87.2

 

Weighted average number of shares outstanding, assuming

dilution and net of treasury shares (in millions)

 

 

 

 

87.3

 

 

 

87.7

 

 

 

88.4

 

 

 

 

87.7

 

 

 

87.5

 

 

 

87.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash dividend per share - declared

 

 

 

$

2.48

 

 

$

2.40

 

 

$

2.32

 

 

 

 

$

1.88

 

$

 

 

$

2.48

 

Cash dividend per share - paid

 

 

 

$

2.46

 

 

$

2.38

 

 

$

2.30

 

 

 

 

$

1.88

 

$

0.62

 

$

2.48

 

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

1)

Participating share awards with the right to receive dividend equivalents are (under the two class method) excluded from the earnings per share calculation (see Note 23 in this Annual Report).


1) Participating share awards with the right to receive dividend equivalents are (under the two class method) excluded from the earnings per share calculation (see Note 21 in this Annual Report).

56


Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

 

Years ended December 31

 

 

Years ended December 31

 

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Net income

 

$

183.7

 

 

$

303.0

 

 

$

561.6

 

 

$

437

 

$

188

 

$

463

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income before tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in cumulative translation adjustments

 

 

(150.2

)

 

 

272.1

 

 

 

(156.3

)

 

(86

)

 

97

 

2

 

Net change in cash flow hedges

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

(8.9

)

 

 

7.9

 

Net change in unrealized components of defined benefit plans

 

 

14.2

 

 

 

31.9

 

 

 

(24.6

)

 

 

37

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

(35

)

Other comprehensive (loss) income, before tax

 

 

(135.1

)

 

 

295.1

 

 

 

(173.0

)

 

(49

)

 

104

 

(33

)

Tax effect allocated to other comprehensive (loss) income

 

 

(4.1

)

 

 

(7.8

)

 

 

7.6

 

 

 

(11

)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

7

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

 

 

(139.2

)

 

 

287.3

 

 

 

(165.4

)

 

(60

)

 

103

 

(26

)

Comprehensive income

 

 

44.5

 

 

 

590.3

 

 

 

396.2

 

 

377

 

291

 

437

 

Less: Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

(7.4

)

 

 

(114.8

)

 

 

(13.9

)

Less: Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

1

 

Comprehensive income attributable to controlling interest

 

$

51.9

 

 

$

705.1

 

 

$

410.1

 

 

$

375

 

$

289

 

$

436

 

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


57


Consolidated BalanceBalance Sheets

 

 

 

At December 31

 

 

 

 

At December 31

 

(DOLLARS AND SHARES IN MILLIONS)

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

 

$

615.8

 

 

$

959.5

 

 

 

 

$

969

 

$

1,178

 

Receivables, net

 

Note 7

 

 

1,652.1

 

 

 

1,696.7

 

 

Note 6

 

1,699

 

1,820

 

Inventories, net

 

Note 8

 

 

757.9

 

 

 

704.3

 

 

Note 7

 

777

 

798

 

Income tax receivables

 

 

 

 

34.1

 

 

 

41.2

 

Prepaid expenses

 

 

 

 

208.6

 

 

 

153.0

 

Income tax receivable

 

 

 

45

 

44

 

Prepaid expenses and accrued income

 

 

 

164

 

164

 

Related party receivable

 

Note 19

 

1

 

2

 

Other current assets

 

 

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

2.8

 

 

Note 12, 17

 

 

20

 

 

 

263

 

Related party receivables

 

Note 21

 

 

15.0

 

 

 

 

Current assets, discontinued operations

 

Note 3

 

 

 

 

 

647.2

 

Total current assets

 

 

 

 

3,285.4

 

 

 

4,204.7

 

 

 

 

 

3,675

 

 

 

4,269

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

Note 10

 

 

1,690.1

 

 

 

1,608.9

 

 

Note 9

 

1,855

 

1,869

 

Investments and other non-current assets

 

Note 9

 

 

323.5

 

 

 

341.0

 

Operating lease right-of-use assets

 

Note 3

 

132

 

141

 

Goodwill

 

Note 11

 

 

1,389.9

 

 

 

1,397.0

 

 

Note 10

 

1,387

 

1,398

 

Intangible assets, net

 

Note 11

 

 

32.7

 

 

 

42.6

 

 

Note 10

 

8

 

14

 

Non-current assets, discontinued operations

 

Note 3

 

 

 

 

 

955.7

 

Other non-current assets

 

Note 8, 17

 

 

481

 

 

 

466

 

Total assets

 

 

 

$

6,721.6

 

 

$

8,549.9

 

 

 

 

$

7,537

 

 

$

8,157

 

Liabilities and equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term debt

 

Note 14

 

$

620.7

 

 

$

19.7

 

 

Note 13

 

$

346

 

$

302

 

Accounts payable

 

 

 

 

978.3

 

 

 

957.3

 

 

 

 

1,129

 

1,227

 

Accrued expenses

 

Notes 12, 13

 

 

935.4

 

 

 

829.5

 

 

Notes 11, 12

 

987

 

1,260

 

Related party liabilities

 

Note 19

 

24

 

38

 

Income tax payable

 

 

 

 

64.9

 

 

 

81.9

 

 

 

 

81

 

97

 

Operating lease liabilities, current

 

Note 3

 

38

 

37

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

 

 

202.5

 

 

 

198.0

 

 

 

 

 

216

 

 

 

187

 

Related party liabilities

 

Note 21

 

 

63.7

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities, discontinued operations

 

Note 3

 

 

 

 

 

568.2

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

 

 

2,865.5

 

 

 

2,654.6

 

 

 

 

 

2,821

 

 

 

3,147

 

Long-term debt

 

Note 14

 

 

1,609.0

 

 

 

1,310.7

 

 

Note 13

 

1,662

 

2,110

 

Pension liability

 

Note 20

 

 

198.2

 

 

 

206.8

 

 

Note 18

 

197

 

248

 

Operating lease liabilities, non-current

 

Note 3

 

94

 

103

 

Other non-current liabilities

 

 

 

 

152.1

 

 

 

144.3

 

 

 

 

 

115

 

 

 

126

 

Non-current liabilities, discontinued operations

 

Note 3

 

 

 

 

 

64.1

 

Total non-current liabilities

 

 

 

 

1,959.3

 

 

 

1,725.9

 

 

 

 

 

2,067

 

 

 

2,587

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

Notes 18, 19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note 17

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock1)

 

 

 

 

102.8

 

 

 

102.8

 

 

 

 

103

 

103

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

 

 

1,329.3

 

 

 

1,329.3

 

 

 

 

1,329

 

1,329

 

Retained earnings

 

 

 

 

2,041.8

 

 

 

4,079.2

 

 

 

 

2,742

 

2,471

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

Note 15

 

 

(423.2

)

 

 

(287.5

)

 

Note 14

 

(408

)

 

(347

)

Treasury stock (15.7 and 15.8 shares, respectively)

 

 

 

 

(1,167.0

)

 

 

(1,188.7

)

Treasury stock (15.3 and 15.4 shares, respectively)

 

 

 

 

(1,133

)

 

 

(1,147

)

Total controlling interest’s equity

 

 

 

 

1,883.7

 

 

 

4,035.1

 

 

 

 

 

2,633

 

 

 

2,409

 

Non-controlling interest

 

 

 

 

13.1

 

 

 

134.3

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

14

 

Total equity

 

 

 

 

1,896.8

 

 

 

4,169.4

 

 

 

 

 

2,648

 

 

 

2,423

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

 

 

$

6,721.6

 

 

$

8,549.9

 

 

 

 

$

7,537

 

 

$

8,157

 

1)

Number of shares: 350 million authorized, 102.8 million issued for both years, and 87.1 and 87.0 million outstanding, net of treasury shares, for 2018 and 2017, respectively.

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


1) Number of shares: 350 million authorized, 102.8 million issued for both years, and 87.5 and 87.4 million outstanding, net of treasury shares, for 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

 

 

 

Years ended December 31

 

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income continuing operations

 

 

 

$

377.5

 

 

$

588.0

 

 

$

559.9

 

Net income discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

(193.8

)

 

 

(285.0

)

 

1.7

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

 

397.1

 

 

 

425.8

 

 

 

383.0

 

Legal provision

 

 

 

 

210.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill, impairment charge

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

234.2

 

 

 

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

 

 

3.0

 

 

 

(47.2

)

 

 

(24.8

)

Loss from equity method investments, net of dividends

 

 

 

 

31.9

 

 

 

38.1

 

 

 

1.0

 

Net change in:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Receivables and other assets, gross

 

 

 

 

(48.4

)

 

 

(102.2

)

 

 

(292.3

)

Inventories, gross

 

 

 

 

(123.9

)

 

 

(21.0

)

 

 

(72.6

)

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

 

 

 

(37.8

)

 

 

112.3

 

 

 

271.2

 

Income taxes

 

 

 

 

(19.2

)

 

 

10.6

 

 

 

15.9

 

Other, net

 

 

 

 

(5.8

)

 

 

(17.7

)

 

 

25.4

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

 

 

590.6

 

 

 

935.9

 

 

 

868.4

 

Investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenditures for property, plant and equipment

 

 

 

 

(560.0

)

 

 

(580.1

)

 

 

(506.8

)

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

 

 

 

 

5.2

 

 

 

10.5

 

 

 

8.2

 

Acquisition of intangible assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.1

)

Acquisition of businesses and interest in affiliates, net of cash acquired

 

 

 

 

(72.0

)

 

 

(125.3

)

 

 

(226.3

)

Net proceeds from divestitures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

(0.9

)

 

 

(3.8

)

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

 

 

(627.7

)

 

 

(697.3

)

 

 

(726.0

)

Financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net decrease in short-term debt

 

 

 

 

355.4

 

 

 

(208.6

)

 

 

(2.7

)

Issuance of long-term debt, net of discount

 

 

 

 

582.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt issuance costs

 

 

 

 

(2.6

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends paid to non-controlling interest

 

 

 

 

(2.1

)

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(1.7

)

Dividends paid

 

 

 

 

(214.3

)

 

 

(208.7

)

 

 

(202.8

)

Shares repurchased

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(157.0

)

 

 

 

Common stock options exercised

 

Note 17

 

 

8.2

 

 

 

7.9

 

 

 

5.9

 

Capital contribution to Veoneer

 

 

 

 

(971.8

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

1.1

 

Net cash used in financing activities

 

 

 

 

(245.0

)

 

 

(566.2

)

 

 

(200.2

)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

 

 

 

(61.6

)

 

 

60.4

 

 

 

(49.0

)

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

 

 

(343.7

)

 

 

(267.2

)

 

 

(106.8

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

 

 

 

959.5

 

 

 

1,226.7

 

 

 

1,333.5

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 

 

 

$

615.8

 

 

$

959.5

 

 

$

1,226.7

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Consolidated Statements of Total Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

 

other com-

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total parent

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

(DOLLARS AND SHARES

 

Number of

 

 

Common

 

 

paid in

 

 

Retained

 

 

prehensive

 

 

Treasury

 

 

shareholders’

 

 

controlling

 

 

Total

 

IN MILLIONS)

 

shares

 

 

stock

 

 

capital

 

 

earnings

 

 

(loss) income

 

 

stock

 

 

equity

 

 

interest

 

 

equity1)

 

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

 

102.8

 

 

$

102.8

 

 

$

1,329.3

 

 

$

3,499.4

 

 

$

(408.5

)

 

$

(1,067.4

)

 

$

3,455.6

 

 

$

12.5

 

 

$

3,468.1

 

Comprehensive Income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

567.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

567.1

 

 

 

(5.5

)

 

 

561.6

 

Net change in cash flow hedges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.9

 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(147.7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(147.7

)

 

 

(8.6

)

 

 

(156.3

)

Pension liability

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(17.2

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(17.2

)

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

(17.0

)

Total Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

410.1

 

 

 

(13.9

)

 

 

396.2

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16.2

 

 

 

16.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16.2

 

Cash dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(204.7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(204.7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(204.7

)

Dividends paid to non-controlling

   interest on subsidiary shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.7

)

 

 

(1.7

)

Investment in subsidiary by

   non-controlling interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

252.3

 

 

 

252.3

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

 

102.8

 

 

$

102.8

 

 

$

1,329.3

 

 

$

3,861.8

 

 

$

(565.5

)

 

$

(1,051.2

)

 

$

3,677.2

 

 

$

249.2

 

 

$

3,926.4

 

Comprehensive Income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

427.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

427.1

 

 

 

(124.1

)

 

 

303.0

 

Net change in cash flow hedges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8.9

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8.9

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8.9

)

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

263.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

263.0

 

 

 

9.1

 

 

 

272.1

 

Pension liability

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23.9

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

24.1

 

Total Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

705.1

 

 

 

(114.8

)

 

 

590.3

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19.5

 

 

 

19.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19.5

 

Cash dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(209.7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(209.7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(209.7

)

Dividends paid to non-controlling

   interest on subsidiary shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(0.1

)

Repurchased shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(157.0

)

 

 

(157.0

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(157.0

)

Balance at December 31, 2017

 

 

102.8

 

 

$

102.8

 

 

$

1,329.3

 

 

$

4,079.2

 

 

$

(287.5

)

 

$

(1,188.7

)

 

$

4,035.1

 

 

$

134.3

 

 

$

4,169.4

 

Comprehensive Income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

190.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

190.4

 

 

 

(6.7

)

 

 

183.7

 

Net change in cash flow hedges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.9

 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(149.5

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(149.5

)

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

(150.2

)

Pension liability

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.1

 

Adjustment due to adoption of

   ASU 2018-02

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.2

 

 

 

(10.2

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

 

Total Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

51.9

 

 

 

(7.4

)

 

 

44.5

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21.7

 

 

 

21.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21.7

 

Cash dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(216.7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(216.7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(216.7

)

Dividends paid to non-controlling

   interest on subsidiary shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2.2

)

 

 

(2.2

)

Adjustment due to adoption of

   ASU 2014-09

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.3

 

Distribution of Veoneer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,024.3

)

 

 

13.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,011.3

)

 

 

(111.6

)

 

 

(2,122.9

)

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.3

)

Balance at December 31, 2018

 

 

102.8

 

 

$

102.8

 

 

$

1,329.3

 

 

$

2,041.8

 

 

$

(423.2

)

 

$

(1,167.0

)

 

$

1,883.7

 

 

$

13.1

 

 

$

1,896.8

 

1)

See Note 15 for further details – includes tax effects where applicable.

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


58


Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

 

Years ended December 31

 

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

437

 

 

$

188

 

 

$

463

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

394

 

 

 

371

 

 

 

351

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

(20

)

 

 

(24

)

 

 

(16

)

Loss from equity method investments, net of dividends

 

 

(3

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

4

 

Other, net

 

 

8

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

(5

)

Net change in operating working capital:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EC antitrust payment

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(203

)

Receivables and other assets, gross

 

 

283

 

 

 

(415

)

 

 

25

 

Inventories, gross

 

 

(19

)

 

 

(34

)

 

 

15

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

 

(314

)

 

 

672

 

 

 

36

 

Income taxes

 

 

(12

)

 

 

54

 

 

 

(29

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

754

 

 

 

849

 

 

 

641

 

Investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenditures for property, plant and equipment

 

 

(458

)

 

 

(344

)

 

 

(483

)

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

 

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

7

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(454

)

 

 

(340

)

 

 

(476

)

Financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net decrease in short-term debt

 

 

(286

)

 

 

(240

)

 

 

(364

)

Increase in long-term debt

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,177

 

 

 

244

 

Repayment of long-term debt

 

 

(20

)

 

 

(723

)

 

 

0

 

Dividends paid to non-controlling interest

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(1

)

Dividends paid

 

 

(165

)

 

 

(54

)

 

 

(217

)

Common stock options exercised

 

 

3

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

 

(469

)

 

 

160

 

 

 

(338

)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(39

)

 

 

64

 

 

 

2

 

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(209

)

 

 

734

 

 

 

(171

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

 

1,178

 

 

 

445

 

 

 

616

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 

$

969

 

 

$

1,178

 

 

$

445

 

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

59


Consolidated Statements of Total Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

other com-

 

 

 

 

 

Total parent

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

(DOLLARS AND SHARES

 

Number of

 

 

Common

 

 

paid in

 

 

Retained

 

 

prehensive

 

 

Treasury

 

 

shareholders’

 

 

controlling

 

 

Total

 

IN MILLIONS)

 

shares

 

 

stock

 

 

capital

 

 

earnings

 

 

(loss) income

 

 

stock

 

 

equity

 

 

interest

 

 

equity1)

 

Balance at December 31, 2018

 

 

103

 

 

$

103

 

 

$

1,329

 

 

$

2,042

 

 

$

(423

)

 

$

(1,167

)

 

$

1,884

 

 

$

13

 

 

$

1,897

 

Comprehensive Income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

462

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

462

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

463

 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

(0

)

 

 

2

 

Pension liability

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(28

)

 

 

 

 

 

(28

)

 

 

 

 

 

(28

)

Total Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

436

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

437

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

Cash dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(217

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(217

)

 

 

 

 

 

(217

)

Dividends paid to non-controlling
   interest on subsidiary shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(1

)

Distribution of Veoneer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

 

 

 

(3

)

Balance at December 31, 2019

 

 

103

 

 

$

103

 

 

$

1,329

 

 

$

2,284

 

 

$

(449

)

 

$

(1,158

)

 

$

2,109

 

 

$

13

 

 

$

2,122

 

Comprehensive Income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

187

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

187

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

188

 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

96

 

 

 

 

 

 

96

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

97

 

Pension liability

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

Total Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

289

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

291

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

Dividends paid to non-controlling
   interest on subsidiary shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(1

)

Balance at December 31, 2020

 

 

103

 

 

$

103

 

 

$

1,329

 

 

$

2,471

 

 

$

(347

)

 

$

(1,147

)

 

$

2,409

 

 

$

14

 

 

$

2,423

 

Comprehensive Income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

435

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

435

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

437

 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(87

)

 

 

 

 

 

(87

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

(86

)

Pension liability

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

Total Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

375

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

377

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

Cash dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(165

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(165

)

 

 

 

 

 

(165

)

Dividends paid to non-controlling
   interest on subsidiary shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(1

)

Balance at December 31, 2021

 

 

103

 

 

$

103

 

 

$

1,329

 

 

$

2,742

 

 

$

(408

)

 

$

(1,133

)

 

$

2,633

 

 

$

15

 

 

$

2,648

 

1) See Note 14 for further details – includes tax effects where applicable.

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

60


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

1. Basis of Presentation

NATURE OF OPERATIONS

Through its operating subsidiaries, Autoliv is a leading developer, manufacturer and supplier of automotive safety systems withto the automotive industry. The Company has a broad range of product offerings, primarily passive safety systems, including modules and components for passenger and driver airbags, side airbags, curtain airbags, seatbelts and steering wheels. AutolivThe Company is also a supplier of anti-whiplash systems and pedestrian protection systems and child seats.systems.

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States (U.S.) Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and include Autoliv, Inc. and all companies over which Autoliv, Inc. directly or indirectly exercises control, which as a general rule means that the Company owns more than 50%50% of the voting rights.

Consolidation is also required when the Company has both the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity (VIE) and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could be significant to the VIE.

All intercompany accounts and transactions within the Company have been eliminated from the consolidated financial statements.

Investments in affiliated companies in which the Company exercises significant influence over the operations and financial policies, but does not control, are reported using the equity method of accounting. Generally, the Company owns between 20 and -50 percent% of such investments.

SEGMENT REPORTING

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

On June 29, 2018 (the “Distribution Date”), Autoliv completed the spin-off of its former Electronics segment (the “spin-off”) through the distribution of all of the issued and outstanding stock of Veoneer, Inc. (“Veoneer”). To effect the spin-off, Autoliv distributed to each Autoliv stockholder one share of Veoneer common stock, par value $1.00 per share, for every one share of Autoliv common stock, par value $1.00 per share, held by such person on the common stock record date, and each Autoliv Swedish Depository Receipt (SDR) holder received one Veoneer SDR for each Autoliv SDR held by such person on the applicable SDR record date. On July 2, 2018, Veoneer’s common stock began regular-way trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “VNE” and its SDRs began trading on Nasdaq Stockholm under the symbol “VNE SDB.” The Company did not retain any equity interest in Veoneer.

In accordance with U.S. GAAP,ASC 280, Segment Reporting, the financial positionoperating segments are determined based on the information provided to the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) on a regular basis and resultsused for the purpose of operationsassessing performance and allocating resources within the Company. The CEO is deemed to be the CODM of Autoliv since he is the person who makes all major decisions on how to allocate the resources and assess the performance of the ElectronicsCompany for both strategic and operational initiatives.

ASC 280 indicates that a component is an operating segment if it meets the following criteria:

It engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses.
Its operating results are presentedregularly reviewed by the CODM to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance.
Its discrete financial information is available.

The Company as discontinued operationsa whole has met the definition of an operating segment as it engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses, the consolidated operating results are regularly reviewed by the CEO/CODM to allocate resources and assess performance, and discrete financial information is available. Additionally, as such,Autoliv supplies customers on a global basis it also manages the business on a global basis. Therefore, based on the above analysis, the Company has concluded that the Company is the single operating and reportable segment under ASC 280, Segment Reporting. For more information on the Company's segment, see Note 20.

RECLASSIFICATIONS AND ROUNDINGS

Certain prior-year amounts have been excluded from continuing operations for all periods presented. The sum of the individual earnings per share amounts from continuing operations and discontinued operations may not equal the total company earnings per share amounts duereclassified to rounding. The cash flows and comprehensive income relatedconform to the Electronics business have not been segregated and are included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and Comprehensive Income, respectively, for all periods presented. With the exception of Note 3, the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements reflect the continuing operations of Autoliv. See Note 3 - Discontinued Operations below for additional information regarding discontinued operations.current year presentation.

On April 1, 2018, in preparation for the spin-off, pursuant to the terms of a master transfer agreement entered into between Autoliv and Veoneer, assets related to the Electronics business were transferred to, and liabilities related to the Electronics business were retained or assumed by Veoneer, however, responsibility for certain product, warranty and recall liabilities for Electronics products manufactured prior to April 1, 2018 was retained by Autoliv as provided in the Distribution Agreement between Autoliv and Veoneer.

Certain amounts in prior year’sthe consolidated financial statements and related footnotes theretoassociated notes may not reconcile due to rounding. All percentages have been reclassified, unless otherwise noted, to conform with the current year presentation as a result of the spin-off of Veoneer.calculated using unrounded amounts.

SEGMENT REPORTING61


Upon completion of the spin-off at June 30, 2018, Autoliv concluded that it has one reportable segment, based on the way the Company currently evaluates its financial performance and manages its operations. The Company will re-evaluate the one reportable segment as the operating model evolves, including the management structure. Prior to the completion of the spin-off, the Company had two reportable segments, Electronics and Passive Safety. The Company’s Passive Safety reportable segment includes the Company’s airbag and seatbelt products and components. For more information on our segment, see Note 22.


2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

Transactions in which the Company obtains control of a business are accounted for according to the acquisition method as described in Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)ASC 805, Business Combinations.Combinations. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recognized and measured at their fair values as of the date control is obtained. Acquisition related costs in connection with a business combination are expensed as incurred. Contingent consideration is recognized and measured at fair value at the acquisition date and until paid is re-measured on a recurring basis. It isbasis and classified as a liability based on appropriate GAAP.liability.

EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTSINVESTMENT

Investments accounted for under the equity method, means that a proportional share of the equity method investment’s net income increases the investment, and a proportional share of losses and payment of dividends decreases it. In the Consolidated Statements of Net Income, the proportional share of the net income (loss) is reported as Income from equity method investments.investment.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of net sales and expenses during the reporting period. The accounting estimates that require management’s most significant judgments include the estimation of variable consideration for ourthe Company's contracts with customers, valuation of stock basedstock-based compensation payments, assessment of recoverability of goodwill and intangible assets, estimation of pension benefit obligations based on actuarial assumptions, estimation of accruals for warranty and product liabilities,recalls, restructuring charges, uncertain tax positions, valuation allowances and legal proceedings. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

In accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, revenue is measured based on consideration specified in a contract with a customer, adjusted for any variable consideration (i.e. price concessions or annual price adjustments)concessions) and estimated at contract inception. The estimated amount of variable consideration that will be received by the Company is based on historical experience and trends, management´s understanding of the status of negotiations with customers and anticipated future pricing strategies. The Company recognizes revenue when it satisfies a performance obligation by transferring control over a product to a customer.

In addition, from time to time, Autolivthe Company may make payments to customers in connection with ongoing and future business. These payments to customers are generally recognized as a reduction to revenue at the time of the commitment to make these payments unless the payment concession can be clearly linked to the future business. If the payments are capitalized, the amounts are amortized to revenue as the related goods are transferred.

Taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction that areand collected by the Company from a customer, are excluded from revenue.

Shipping and handling costs associated with outbound freight afterbefore control of a product has transferred to a customer are accounted for as a fulfillment cost and are included in cost of sales.

Nature of goods and services

The following is a description of principal activities from which the Company generates its revenue. The Company has after the spin-off of its Electronics business currently one operating segment, Passive safety systems, which includes airbag and seatbelt products and components. The Company generates revenue from the sale of production parts, which includes airbag and seatbelt products and components, to original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”).

The Company accounts for individual products separately if they are distinct (i.e., if a product is separately identifiable from other items and if a customer can benefit from it on its own or with other resources that are readily available to the customer). The consideration for each of the products, including any price concessions, or annual price adjustments, is based on their stand-alone selling prices for each of the products.prices. The stand-alone selling prices are determined based on the cost-plus margin approach.

The Company recognizes revenue for production parts primarily at a point in time.

For production parts with revenue recognized at a point in time, the Company recognizes revenue upon shipment to the customers and transfer of title and risk of loss under standard commercial terms (typically FOB shipping point).

There are certain contracts where the criteria to recognize revenue over time have been met (e.g., there is no alternative use to the Company and the Company has an enforceable right to payment). In such cases, at period end, the Company recognizes revenue and a related asset and associated cost of goods sold and reduction in inventory. However, the financial impact of these contracts is immaterial considering the very short production cycles and limited inventory days on hand, which is typical for the automotive industry.hand. The contract balances with customers, included in other current assets, amounted to $20 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.

The amount of revenue recognized is based on the purchase order price and adjusted for variable consideration (i.e. price concessions or annual price adjustments)concessions). Customers typically pay for the production parts based on customary business practices.

62



GOVERNMENT GRANTS

Generally, the Company receives grants related to assets or grants related to income. The Company account for government grants as follows depending on which category the grants fall into. Government grants connected to Capital Expenditure are offset against the capitalized costs of the asset in the balance sheet when: a) all performance obligations connected to the government grant have been fulfilled; and b) the cash has been received. Other government grants including those reimbursing expenses are recognized in the profit and loss when: a) all performance obligations connected to the government grant have been fulfilled; and b) the cash has been received.

When the cash has been received but there are outstanding performance obligations connected to the government grants received, the cash received is recognized as other payables and offset against the capitalized costs when the outstanding performance obligations are fulfilled.

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING, NET (R,D&E)

ResearchResearch and development and most engineering expenses are expensed as incurred. These expenses are reported net of expense reimbursements from contracts to perform engineering design and product development fulfillment activities related to the production of parts. For the years 2021, 2020 and 2019 total reimbursements from customers were $203 million, $181 million and $199 million, respectively.

Certain engineering expenses related to long-term supply arrangements are capitalized when defined criteria, such as the existence of a contractual guarantee for reimbursement, are met. The aggregate amount of such assets is not significant in any period presented.

Tooling is generally agreed upon as a separate contract or a separate component of an engineering contract, as a pre-production project. Capitalization of tooling costs is made only when the specific criteria for capitalization of customer funded tooling is met or the criteria for capitalization as Property, Plant & Equipment (P,P&E) for tools owned by the Company are fulfilled. Depreciation on the Company’s own tooling is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Net Income as Cost of sales.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

The compensation costs for all of the Company’s stock-based compensation awards are determined based on the fair value method as defined in ASC 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation.Compensation. The Company records the compensation expense for awards under the Stock Incentive Plan, including Restricted Stock Units (RSUs), Performance Shares (PSs) and stock options (SOs), over the respective vesting period. For further details, see Note 17.16.

INCOME TAXES

Current tax liabilities and assets are recognized for the estimated taxes payable or refundable on the tax returns for the current year. In certain circumstances, payments or refunds may extend beyond twelve months, in such cases amounts would be classified as non-current taxes payable or refundable.receivable. Deferred tax liabilities or assets are recognized for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences and carryforwards that result from events that have been recognized in either the financial statements or the tax returns, but not both. The measurement of current and deferred tax liabilities and assets is based on provisions of enacted tax laws. Deferred tax assets are reduced by the amount of any tax benefits that are not expected to be realized. A valuation allowance is recognized if, based on the weight of all available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Evaluation of the realizability of deferred tax assets is subject to significant judgment requiring careful consideration of all facts and circumstances. The Company classifies deferred tax assets and liabilities as non-current in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Tax assets and liabilities are not offset unless attributable to the same tax jurisdiction and netting is possible according to law and, as it relates to payables and receivables, expected to take place in the same period.

Tax benefits associated with tax positions taken in the Company’s income tax returns are initially recognized and measured in the financial statements when it is more likely than not that those tax positions will be sustained upon examination by the relevant taxing authorities. The Company’s evaluation of its tax benefits is based on the probability of the tax position being upheld if challenged by the taxing authorities (including through negotiation, appeals, settlement and litigation). Whenever a tax position does not meet the initial recognition criteria, the tax benefit is subsequently recognized and measured if there is a substantive change in the facts and circumstances that cause a change in judgment concerning the sustainability of the tax position upon examination by the relevant taxing authorities. In cases where tax benefits meet the initial recognition criterion, the Company continues, in subsequent periods, to assess its ability to sustain those positions. A previously recognized tax benefit is derecognized when it is no longer more likely than not that the tax position would be sustained upon examination. Liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits are classified as non-current unless the payment of the liability is expected to be made within the next 12 months.

63


EARNINGS PER SHARE

The Company calculates basic earnings per share (EPS) by dividing net income attributable to controlling interest by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period (net of treasury shares). The Company’s unvested RSUs and PSs, of which some include the right to receive non-forfeitable dividend equivalents, are considered participating securities. The diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if common stock werewas issued for awards under the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan and is calculated using the more dilutive method of either the two-class method or the treasury stock method. The treasury stock method assumes that the Company uses the proceeds from the exercise of stock option awards to repurchase ordinary shares at the average market price during the period. For unvested restricted stock, assumed proceeds under the treasury stock method will include unamortized compensation cost and windfall tax benefits or shortfalls. Post spin-off assumed proceeds under the treasury stock method related to RSUs will only include unamortized compensation cost related to Autoliv employees holding Autoliv RSUs. Calculations of EPS under the two-class method exclude from the numerator any dividends paid or owed on participating securities and any undistributed earnings considered to be attributable to participating securities. The related participating securities are similarly excluded from the denominator. For further details, see Notes 1716 and 23.21.


CASH EQUIVALENTS

The Company considers all highly liquid investment instruments purchased with an originala maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

RECEIVABLES AND ALLOWANCE FOR EXPECTED CREDIT LOSSES

RECEIVABLES

In addition to individually assess overdue customer balances for expected credit losses, the Company also calculates an allowance that reflects the expected credit losses on receivables considering both historical experience as well as forward looking assumptions. The Company has guidelinesmethod calculates the expected credit loss for calculatinga group of customers by using the allowance for bad debts. In determining the amount of a bad debt allowance, management uses its judgment to consider factors such as the age of the receivables,customer groups’ average short-term default rates based on officially published credit ratings and the Company’s prior experience withhistorical experience. These default rates are considered the customer, the experienceCompany’s best estimate of other enterprises in the same industry, the customer’s ability to pay, and/or an appraisalpay. The Company regularly reassess the customer group’s and the applied customer group’s default rates by using its best judgement when considering changes in customer’s credit ratings, customer’s historical payments and loss experience, current market and economic conditions and the Company’s expectations of currentfuture market and economic conditions. Collateral is typically not required.

There can be no assurance that the amount ultimately realized for receivables will not be materially different than that assumed in the calculation of the allowance.allowance for expected credit losses.

DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

The Company uses derivative financial instruments, primarily forwards, options and swaps to reduce the effects of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, interest rates and the resulting variability of the Company’s operating results. On the date that a derivative contract is entered into, the Company designates the derivative as either (1) a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment (a fair value hedge), (2) a hedge of the exposure of a forecasted transaction or of the variability in the cash flows of a recognized asset or liability (a cash flow hedge) or (3) an economic hedge not applying special hedge accounting pursuant to ASC 815.

When a hedge is classified as a fair value hedge, the change in the fair value of the hedge is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Net Income along with the offsetting change in the fair value of the hedged item. When a hedge is classified as a cash flow hedge, any change in the fair value of the hedge is initially recorded in equity as a component of Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) and reclassified into the Consolidated Statements of Net Income when the hedge transaction affects net earnings. The Company uses the forward rate with respect to the measurement of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges when revaluing foreign exchange forward contracts. All derivatives are recognized in the consolidated financial statements at fair value.

For certain other derivatives, hedgeHedge accounting is not applied either because non-hedge accounting treatment creates the same accounting result or the hedge does not meet the hedge accounting requirements, although entered into applying the same rationale concerning mitigating market risk that occurs from changes in interest and foreign exchange rates.

For further details on the Company’s financial instruments, see Notes 54 and 14.13.

INVENTORIES

INVENTORIES

The cost of inventories is computed according to the first-in first-out method (FIFO). Cost includes the cost of materials, direct labor and the applicable share of manufacturing overhead. Inventories are evaluated based on individual or, in some cases, groups of inventory items. Reserves are established to reduce the value of inventories to the lower of cost andor net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. Excess inventories are quantities of items that exceed anticipated sales or usage for a reasonable period. The Company has guidelines for calculatingcalculates provisions for excess inventories based on the number of months of inventories on hand compared to anticipated sales or usage. Management uses its judgment to forecast sales or usage and to determine what constitutes a reasonable period. There can be no assurance that the amount ultimately realized for inventories will not be materially different than that assumed in the calculation of the reserves.

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, Plant and Equipment areis recorded at historical cost. Construction in progress generally involves short-term projects for which capitalized interest is not significant. The Company provides for depreciation of property, plant and equipment computed under the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives, or in the case of leasehold improvements over the shorter of the useful life or the lease term. Amortization on capital leases is recognized with depreciation expense in the Consolidated Statements of Net Income over the shorter of the assets’ expected life or the lease contract term. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.

64


LEASES

In accordance with ASC 842, Leases, the Company recognizes contracts that is, or contains, a lease when the contract conveys the right to control the use of a physically identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration in the balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and lease liability. The Company recognizes a right-of-use asset and a lease liability at lease commencement. The lease liability for both finance and operating leases is measured at the present value of the remaining lease payments, discounted at the Company's incremental borrowing rate (if the implicit interest rate in the lease contract is not readily determinable). The right-of-use asset (ROU) for finance and operating leases is initially measured at the sum of the Initial lease liability plus initial direct costs plus prepaid lease payments minus lease incentives received. Lease payments include undiscounted fixed payments plus optional payments that are reasonably certain to be owed. Lease payments do not include variable lease payments other than those that depend on an index or rate. Variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate are included in the calculation of lease payments and in the measurement of the lease liability.

If the rate implicit in the lease is not readily determinable, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate as the discount rate. The Company uses its best judgement when determining the incremental borrowing rate, which is the rate of interest that the Company would have to pay to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term to the lease payments in a similar currency.

The Company has elected the practical expedient of not separating lease components from non-lease components for all its classes of underlying assets. The Company has also elected to recognize the lease payments for short-term leases in its consolidated statement of income on a straight-line basis over the lease term and recognize the variable lease payments in the period in which the obligation for those payments is incurred.

Finance lease right-of-use assets are presented together with other property, plant and equipment assets and finance lease liabilities are presented together with other current and non-current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

For further details on the Company’s leases, see Note 3.

LONG-LIVED ASSET IMPAIRMENT

The Company evaluates the carrying value and useful lives of long-lived assets, other than goodwill and intangible assets, when indications of impairment are evident or it is likely that the useful lives have decreased, in which case the Company depreciates the assets over the remaining useful lives. Impairment testing is primarily done by using the cash flow method based on undiscounted future cash flows. Estimated undiscounted cash flows for a long-lived asset being evaluated for recoverability are compared with the respective carrying amount of that asset. If the estimated undiscounted cash flows exceed the carrying amount of the assets, the carrying amounts of the long-lived asset are considered recoverable and an impairment cannot be recorded. However, if the carrying amount of a group of assets exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, an entity must then measure the long-lived assets’ fair value to determine whether an impairment loss should be recognized, generally using a discounted cash flow model.Generally, the lowest level of cash flows for impairment assessment is customer platform level.


GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill represents the excess of the fair value of consideration transferred over the fair value of net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill is not amortized but is subject to at least an annual review for impairment. Other intangible assets, principally related to acquired technology, are amortized over their useful lives which range from 3 to 25 years.years.

The Company performs its annual impairment testing in the fourth quarter of each year. Impairment testing is required more often than annually if an event or circumstance indicates that an impairment, or decline in value, may have occurred. For 2018 theThe Company has opted to useuses either a qualitative assessment or a quantitative calculation for its impairment testing. The qualitative assessment permits the Company to assess whether it is more than likely than not (i.e. a likelihood of greater than 50%) that goodwill or an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If the Company concludes based on the qualitative assessment that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of goodwill or an indefinite-lived intangible assetsasset is less than its carrying amount, it would not have to quantitatively determine the asset’s fair value.

In conducting its qualitative impairment testing, the Company has used the most recent fair value calculation for its indefinite-lived intangible assets as the starting point for the qualitative assessment. The Company has also consideredconsider external factors that could affect the significant inputs used to determine fair value.

In 2021, the Company performed a quantitative impairment test by calculating the fair value of its goodwill. The estimated fair market value of goodwill is determined by the discounted cash flow method. The Company discounts projected operating cash flows using its weighted average cost of capital. Estimating the fair value requires the Company to make judgments about appropriate discount rates, growth rates, relevant comparable company earnings multiples and the amount and timing of expected future cash flows. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is considered not to be impaired. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for the excess of carrying amount over the fair value of the respective reporting unit. To supplement this analysis, the Company compares the market value of its equity, calculated by reference to the quoted market prices of its shares, with the book value of its equity.

There were no0 impairments of goodwill related to the Company’s continuing operations from 20162019 through 2018.2021.

65


WARRANTIES AND RECALLS

The Company records liabilities for product recalls when probable claims are identified and when it is possible to reasonably estimate costs. Recall costs are costs incurred when the customer decides to formally recall a product due to a known or suspected safety concern. Product recall costs typically includeare estimated based on the expected cost of replacing the product and the customer´s cost of carrying out the recall, which is affected by the number of vehicles subject to recall and the cost of the product being replaced as well as the customer’s cost of the recall, including labor and materials to remove and replace the defective part.product. Insurance receivables, related to recall issues covered by the insurance, are included within other current and non-current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Provisions for warranty claims are estimated based on prior experience, likely changes in performance of newer products and the mix and volume of products sold. The provisions are recorded on an accrual basis.

RESTRUCTURING PROVISIONS

The Company defines restructuring expense to include costs directly associated with rightsizing, exit or disposal activities.

Estimates of restructuring charges are based on information available at the time such charges are recorded. In general, management anticipates that restructuring activities will be completed within a timeframe such that significant changes to the exit plan are not likely. Due to inherent uncertainty involved in estimating restructuring expenses, actual amounts paid for such activities may differ from amounts initially estimated.

PENSION OBLIGATIONS

The Company provides for both defined contribution plans and defined benefit plans. A defined contribution plan generally specifies the periodic amount that the employer must contribute to the plan and how that amount will be allocated to the eligible employees who perform services during the same period. A defined benefit pension plan is one that contains pension benefit formulas, which generally determine the amount of pension benefits that each employee will receive for services performed during a specified period of employment.

The amount recognized as a defined benefit liability is the net total of projected benefit obligation (PBO) minus the fair value of plan assets (if any) (see Note 20)18). The plan assets are measured at fair value. The inputs to the fair value measurement of the plan assets are mainly level 2 inputs (see Note 5).

CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Various claims, lawsuits and proceedings are pending or threatened against the Company or its subsidiaries, covering a range of matters that arise in the ordinary course of its business activities with respect to commercial, product liability or other matters (see Note 18)12).

The Company diligently defends itself in such matters and, in addition, carries insurance coverage to the extent reasonably available against insurable risks.

The Company records liabilities for claims, lawsuits and proceedings when they are probable and it is possible to reasonably estimate the cost of such liabilities. Legal costs expected to be incurred in connection with a loss contingency are expensed as such costs are incurred.

The Company believes, based on currently available information, that the resolution of outstanding matters, other than theany antitrust related matters described in Note 18,17 after taking into account recorded liabilities and available insurance coverage, should not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.


However, due to the inherent uncertainty associated with such matters, there can be no assurance that the final outcomes of these matters will not be materially different than currently estimated.

TRANSLATION OF NON-U.S. SUBSIDIARIES

The balance sheets of subsidiaries with functional currency other than U.S. dollars are translated into U.S. dollars using year-end exchange rates.

The statementsStatements of operationsIncome of these subsidiaries is translated into U.S. dollars using the average exchange rates for the year. Translation differences are reflected in equity as a component of OCI.

RECEIVABLES AND LIABILITIES IN NON-FUNCTIONAL CURRENCIES

Receivables and liabilities not denominated in functional currencies are converted at year-end exchange rates. Net transaction gains/(losses),losses, reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Net Income, amounted to $(22.1)$(29) million in 2018, $(27.0)2021, $(24) million in 20172020 and $(4.3)$(15) million in 2016,2019, and are recorded in operating income if they relate to operational receivables and liabilities or are recorded in other non-operating items, net if they relate to financial receivables and liabilities.

66


NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Adoption of New Accounting Standards

In February 2018,Changes to U.S. GAAP are established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued(“FASB”) in the form of accounting standards updates (“ASUs”) to the FASB’s Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2018-02, Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) – Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI), which allows a reclassification from AOCI to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”)Codification (ASC). Consequently, the amendments in ASU 2018-02 eliminate the stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Act. The amendments in ASU 2018-02 are effective for all entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual period for which financial statements (interim or annual) have not been issued or made available for issuance. The amendments in ASU 2018-02 should be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period (or periods) in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Act is recognized. The Company early adopted ASU 2018-02 asconsiders the applicability and impact of January 1, 2018all ASUs. ASUs not listed below were assessed and made a reclassification from AOCIdetermined to Retained earnings of approximately $10 million.

In January 2018, the FASB released guidancebe either not applicable or are expected to have an immaterial impact on the accounting for tax on the global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) provisionsCompany’s consolidated financial statements.

Adoption of the Tax Act. The GILTI provisions impose a tax on foreign income in excess of a deemed return on tangible assets of foreign corporations. New Accounting Standards

In the first quarter of 2018, the Company elected to treat any potential GILTI inclusions as a period cost.

In March 2017,December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Compensation-Retirement Benefits (Topic 715) - Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, which requires the service cost component to be reported in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the consolidated statements of income separately from the service cost component and outside operating income. The amendments in ASU 2017-07 are effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual period for which financial statements (interim or annual) have not been issued or made available for issuance. The amendments in ASU 2017-07 should be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the consolidated statements of income. The Company adopted ASU 2017-07 in the first quarter of 2018. Prior comparative periods have not been adjusted since the impact of ASU 2017-07 is not material for any consolidated financial statements periods presented.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740) – Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires an entity to recognizesimplifies the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. Current GAAP prohibits the recognition of current and deferred income taxes for an intra-entity asset transfer until the asset has been sold to an outside party. Consequently, the amendments in this ASU 2016-16 eliminate the exception for an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory. Two common examples of assets included in the scope of ASU 2016-16 are intellectual property and property, plant, and equipment. The amendments in ASU 2016-16 are effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual reporting period for which financial statements (interim or annual) have not been issued or made available for issuance. The amendments in ASU 2016-16 should be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The adoption of ASU 2016-16 effective January 1, 2018 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements for any periods presented.


In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which outlines a single, comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance issued by the FASB, including industry specific guidance. In 2016, the FASB issued accounting standard updates to address implementation issues and to clarify guidance in certain areas. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In addition,income taxes. ASU 2014-09 requires certain additional disclosure around the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The Company adopted ASU 2014-09 effective January 1, 2018 and utilized the modified retrospective (cumulative effect) transition method to all contracts not completed at the date of initial application. The Company applied the modified retrospective transition method through a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings. The adoption of the new revenue standard did not have a material impact on net sales, net income, or balance sheet.

Balance Sheet

(Dollars in millions)

 

Balance at

December 31, 2017

 

 

Adjustments due

to ASU 2014-09

 

 

Balance at

January 1, 2018

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inventories, net1)

 

$

859.1

 

 

$

(17.3

)

 

$

841.8

 

Other current assets1)

 

 

228.9

 

 

 

22.0

 

 

 

250.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retained Earnings1)

 

 

4,079.2

 

 

 

3.3

 

 

 

4,082.5

 

1)

Impact at adoption which included both continuing and discontinued operations.

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2018

 

Income Statement

(Dollars in millions)

 

As Reported

 

 

Balances without

adoption of

ASU 2014-09

 

 

Effect of Changes

 

Net sales

 

$

8,678.2

 

 

$

8,673.7

 

 

$

4.5

 

Cost of sales

 

 

(6,966.9

)

 

 

(6,963.1

)

 

 

(3.8

)

Operating income

 

 

686.0

 

 

 

685.3

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2018

 

Balance Sheet

(Dollars in millions)

 

As Reported

 

 

Balances without

adoption of

ASU 2014-09

 

 

Effect of Changes

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inventories, net

 

$

757.9

 

 

$

773.6

 

 

$

(15.7

)

Other current assets

 

 

244.6

 

 

 

225.1

 

 

 

19.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retained Earnings

 

 

2,041.8

 

 

 

2,039.1

 

 

 

2.7

 

Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Adopted

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, Compensation-Retirement Benefits-Defined Benefit Plans-General (Subtopic 715-20), Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans, which modifies the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. The amendments in ASU 2018-14 remove disclosures that no longer are considered cost beneficial, clarify the specific requirements of disclosures, and add disclosure requirements identified as relevant. The amendments in ASU 2018-14 are effective for public business entities for annual periods ending after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted. An entity should apply the amendments in ASU 2018-14 on a retrospective basis to all periods presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of its pending adoption of ASU 2018-14 on the consolidated financial statements.


In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820), Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, which modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820. The amendments in ASU 2018-13 are effective for all entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within these annual periods. The amendments on changes in unrealized gains and losses, the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements, and the narrative description of measurement uncertainty should be applied prospectively for only the most recent interim or annual period presented in the initial annual year of adoption. All other amendments should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented upon their effective date. An entity is permitted to early adopt either the entire standard or only the provisions that eliminate or modify disclosures upon issuance of ASU 2018-13. The Company believes that the pending adoption of ASU 2018-13 will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivative and Hedging (Topic 815), Targeted improvements to accounting for hedging activities. The amendments in ASU 2017-12 better align an entity’s risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedge results. The amendments in ASU 2017-12 also include certain targeted improvements to ease the application of current guidance related to the assessment of hedge effectiveness. The amendments in ASU 2017-12 modify disclosures required in current GAAP. Those modifications include a tabular disclosure related to the effect on the income statement of fair value and cash flow hedges and eliminate the requirement to disclose the ineffective portion of the change in fair value of hedging instruments. The amendments also require new tabular disclosures related to cumulative basis adjustments for fair value hedges. The amendments in ASU 2017-12 are effective for public business entities for annual period beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. For cash flow and net investment hedges existing at the date of adoption, an entity should apply a cumulative-effect adjustment related to eliminating the separate measurement of ineffectiveness to accumulated other comprehensive income with a corresponding adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the beginning of the annual period that an entity adopts the amendments in ASU 2017-12. The Company believes that the pending adoption of ASU 2017-12 will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements since the Company terminated its existing cash flow hedges in the first quarter of 2018.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which requires measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held and requires enhanced disclosures regarding significant estimates and judgments used in estimating credit losses. ASU 2016-132019-12 is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019,2020, and early adoption is permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of its pending adoption of ASU 2016-13 on the consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 affects any entity that enters into a lease, with some specified scope exceptions. For public business entities, the amendments in ASU 2016-02 are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company intendsamendments related to adopt ASU 2016-02changes in the annual period beginning January 1, 2019. The Company intends to apply theownership of foreign equity method investments or foreign subsidiaries should be applied on a modified retrospective transition method and elect the transition optionbasis through a cumulative-effect adjustment to use the effective date January 1, 2019, as the date of initial application. The Company will not adjust its comparative period financial statements for effects of the ASU 2016-02, or make the new required lease disclosures for periods before the effective date. The Company will recognize its cumulative effect transition adjustmentretained earnings as of the effective date. In addition, the Company intends to elect the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard, which among other things, will allow the Company to carry forward the historical lease classification.

During the fourth quarter, the Company continued its process to identify leasing arrangements and to compare its accounting policies and practices to the requirementsbeginning of the new standard. Specifically, the Company is continuing to assess whether there are any “embedded leases” in arrangements with its suppliers and customers that may result in right to use assets or in the Company being a lessor for tools they own that are dedicated to a specific customer. In addition, the Company has implemented a new system to assist with lease accounting.fiscal year of adoption. The Company regularly enters into operating leases, for which current GAAP does not require recognition on the balance sheet. The Company anticipates that the adoption ofadopted ASU 2016-02 will primarily result in the recognition of most operating leases on its balance sheet resulting in an increase in reported right-of-use assets and leasing liabilities. The Company will continue to assess the impact from the new standard, including consideration of control and process changes to capture lease data necessary to apply ASU 2016-02. The Company anticipates that the adoption of the new standard will result in recording lease assets and lease liabilities in the range of $165 million and $180 million2019-12 as of January 1, 2019.  In addition,2021, and the Company doesadoption did not anticipatehave a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Adopted

None that are expected to have an impact on the financial statements where they are deemed to be the lessor in an “embedded lease” arrangement. Company.

3. Leases

RECLASSIFICATIONS

Certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation (see Note 1 regarding discontinued operations).


3. Discontinued Operations

As discussed in Note 1. Basis of Presentation above, on June 29, 2018, the Company completed the spin-off of Veoneer and the requirements for the presentation of Veoneer as a discontinued operation were met on that date. Accordingly, Veoneer’s historical financial results are reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements as discontinued operations. The Company did not allocate any general corporate overhead or interest expense to discontinued operations.

The financial results of Veoneer are presented as loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The following table presents the financial results of Veoneer (dollars in millions). 2018 includes six months of discontinued operations.

 

 

Years ended December 31

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Net sales

 

$

1,122.9

 

 

$

2,245.8

 

 

$

2,152.0

 

Cost of sales

 

 

(896.4

)

 

 

(1,776.5

)

 

 

(1,723.0

)

Gross profit

 

 

226.5

 

 

 

469.3

 

 

 

429.0

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

(59.7

)

 

 

(83.1

)

 

 

(81.7

)

Research, development and engineering

   expenses, net

 

 

(224.0

)

 

 

(370.3

)

 

 

(293.7

)

Goodwill, Impairment charge

 

 

 

 

 

(234.2

)

 

 

 

Amortization of intangibles

 

 

(10.5

)

 

 

(35.8

)

 

 

(33.2

)

Other income (expense), net

 

 

(53.4

)

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

(3.7

)

Operating loss

 

 

(121.1

)

 

 

(254.3

)

 

 

16.7

 

Loss from equity method investments

 

 

(29.9

)

 

 

(30.7

)

 

 

 

Interest income

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

 

(0.4

)

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(0.2

)

Other non-operating items, net

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

3.1

 

Loss before income taxes

 

 

(150.2

)

 

 

(285.9

)

 

 

19.6

 

Income tax (expense) benefit

 

 

(43.6

)

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

(17.9

)

Loss from discontinued operations, net of

   income taxes

 

 

(193.8

)

 

 

(285.0

)

 

 

1.7

 

Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

(8.3

)

 

 

(126.1

)

 

 

(7.0

)

Net loss from discontinued operations

 

$

(185.5

)

 

$

(158.9

)

 

$

8.7

 

The Company has incurred $84.8 million in separation costs related to the spin-offoperating leases for offices, manufacturing and research buildings, machinery, cars, data processing and other equipment. The Company’s leases have remaining lease terms of Veoneer,1-46 years, some of which $76.3 million has been incurred 2018include options to extend the leases for up to 25 years, and some of which include options to terminate the leases within 1 year to date and is reported in Other income (expense), net. These costs are primarily related to professional fees associated with planning the spin-off, as well as spin-off activities within finance, tax, legal and information system functions and certain investment banking fees incurred upon the completion.

As of the spin-off.


The following table summarizes the carrying value of major classes of assets and liabilities of Veoneer, reclassified as assets and liabilities of discontinued operations at December 31, 2017 (dollars in millions).

 

 

At December

31, 2017

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

Receivables, net

 

$

460.5

 

Inventories, net

 

 

154.8

 

Other current assets

 

 

31.9

 

Total current assets, discontinued operations

 

 

647.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

364.2

 

Investments and other non-current assets

 

 

177.5

 

Goodwill

 

 

291.8

 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

122.2

 

Total non-current assets, discontinued operations

 

$

955.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

323.5

 

Accrued expenses

 

 

199.1

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

45.6

 

Total current liabilities, discontinued operations

 

 

568.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 

 

11.0

 

Pension liability

 

 

19.1

 

Other non-current liabilities

 

 

34.0

 

Total non-current liabilities, discontinued operations

 

$

64.1

 

In connection with the spin-off, Autoliv entered into definitive agreements with Veoneer that, among other matters, set forth the terms and conditions of the spin-off and provide a framework for Autoliv’s relationship with Veoneer after the spin-off, including the following (collectively, the “Spin-off Agreements”):

Distribution Agreement

The Distribution Agreement sets forth the principal transactions taken by Veoneer and by Autoliv in connection with the spin-off and the terms to govern certain aspects of the parties’ relationship following the spin-off. The Distribution Agreement also provides for cross-indemnities that, except as otherwise provided in the Distribution Agreement, are principally designed to place financial responsibility for the obligations and liabilities of Veoneer’s business with Veoneer and financial responsibility for the obligations and liabilities of Autoliv’s business with Autoliv. However, Autoliv has agreed to indemnify Veoneer for certain warranty, recall and product liabilities for Electronics products manufactured prior to April 1, 2018, and has retained an indemnification liability.

Amended and Restated Transition Services Agreement

Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Transition Services Agreement, Autoliv or one of its subsidiaries will provide various services to Veoneer and its subsidiaries and Veoneer or one of its subsidiaries agreed to provide various services to Autoliv and subsidiaries of Autoliv for a limited time to help ensure an orderly transition following the spin-off. The services will terminate no later than March 31, 2020.

Employee Matters Agreement

The Employee Matters Agreement governs Autoliv’s and Veoneer’s compensation and employee benefit obligations with respect to the employees and non-employee directors of each company.

Pursuant to the Agreement,2021, the Company transferred to Veoneer pension benefits and postretirement benefits other than pension related to Veoneer employees. The transfer of assets and obligations to Veoneer resulted in a net decrease in the underfunded status of the sponsored pension and postretirement benefits other than pension of $22.8 million and the transfer of unrecognized losses in accumulated other comprehensive income of $6.3 million on the Distribution Date.  

Tax Matters Agreement

Pursuant to the Tax Matters Agreement, Autoliv and Veoneer allocated the liability for taxes and certain tax assets between the two companies.  The Tax Matters Agreement also governs the parties’ respective rights, responsibilities, and obligations with respect to U.S. federal, state, local and foreign taxes (including taxes arising in the ordinary course of business and taxes, if any, incurred as a result of any failure of the spin-off and certain related transactions to qualify as tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes), tax attributes, the preparation and filing of tax returns, the control of audits and other tax proceedings, and assistance and cooperation in respect of tax matters.


Pursuant to the Tax Matters Agreement, Autoliv is the primary obligor on all taxes which relate to any period prior to April 1, 2018. Consequently, the Company is liable for any transition taxes under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

Reseller Agreements

Reseller agreements are primarily comprised of arrangements between Veoneer and Autoliv business units in Japan, the U. S., India and Sweden to address situations in which customershas no additional material operating leases that have not yet been able to update their systems to reflect Veoneer as the supplier. Under the terms of these agreements and based on the substance of the relationships with the customers, Veoneer has the responsibility to provide the products to the customers although orders may be placed with Autoliv and Autoliv may collect the cash for the associated invoices which is then remitted to Veoneer.

Veoneer Capital Contribution

In connection with the spin-off, Autoliv capitalized Veoneer with approximately $1 billion of cash. Net assets of $2,129 million, including approximately $1 billion of cash, were transferred to Veoneer on or prior to the Distribution Date, including $13 million of accumulated other comprehensive loss (primarily related to pension and cumulative translation adjustment) and the non-controlling interest of $112 million. This resulted in a $2,030 million reduction to retained earnings. In the second half of 2018 an adjustment to the cash contribution amount of $5 million was made reducing the net assets contributed to Veoneer to $2,123 million.

The following table presents depreciation, amortization, capital expenditures, acquisition of businesses and significant non-cash items of the discontinued operations related to Veoneer (dollars in millions). 2018 includes six months of discontinued operations.

commenced.

 

 

Years ended December 31

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Depreciation

 

$

44.8

 

 

$

82.9

 

 

$

69.7

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

10.5

 

 

 

35.8

 

 

 

33.2

 

Capital expenditures

 

 

71.1

 

 

 

109.6

 

 

 

100.9

 

Acquisition in affiliate, net

 

 

71.0

 

 

 

123.9

 

 

 

227.4

 

M/A-COM earn-out adjustment

 

 

(14.0

)

 

 

(12.7

)

 

 

 

Undistributed loss from equity method investment

 

 

29.9

 

 

 

30.7

 

 

 

 

4. Revenue

Disaggregation of revenue

In the following tables, revenue from the Company’s continuing operations is disaggregated by primary regions and products.

Net Sales by Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Years ended December 31

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

China

 

$

1,522.2

 

 

$

1,421.2

 

 

$

1,385.4

 

Japan

 

 

827.9

 

 

 

787.0

 

 

 

718.6

 

Rest of Asia

 

 

844.8

 

 

 

789.9

 

 

 

726.2

 

Americas

 

 

2,735.1

 

 

 

2,435.2

 

 

 

2,548.0

 

Europe

 

 

2,748.2

 

 

 

2,703.5

 

 

 

2,543.4

 

Total net sales

 

$

8,678.2

 

 

$

8,136.8

 

 

$

7,921.6

 

Net Sales by Products

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Years ended December 31

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Airbag Products and Other1)

 

$

5,698.6

 

 

$

5,343.2

 

 

$

5,256.4

 

Seatbelt Products1)

 

 

2,979.6

 

 

 

2,793.6

 

 

 

2,665.2

 

Total net sales

 

$

8,678.2

 

 

$

8,136.8

 

 

$

7,921.6

 

1) Including Corporate and other sales.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contract balances

The contract assets relate to the Company's rights to consideration for work completed but not billed (generally in conjunction with contracts for which revenue is recognized over time) at the reporting date on production parts. The contract assets are reclassified into the receivables balance when the rights to receive payments become unconditional. There have been no impairment losses recognized related to contract assets arising from the Company’s contracts with customers. Certain contracts have resulted in consideration in advance of fulfilling the performance obligations and the amounts received have been classified as contract liabilities.


The following tables providesprovide information about receivables, contract assets,the Company’s operating leases. The Company has not identified any material finance leases as of December 31, 2021 and contract liabilities from contracts with customers.

Contract Balances with Customers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

At December 31

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Receivables, net

 

$

1,652.1

 

 

$

1,696.7

 

Contract assets 1)

 

 

19.5

 

 

 

 

Contract liabilities 2)

 

 

29.4

 

 

 

33.0

 

1) Included in other current assets.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2) Included in other current and other non-current liabilities.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Receivables, net of allowance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

At December 31

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Receivables

 

$

1,659.4

 

 

$

1,703.0

 

Allowance at beginning of period

 

 

(6.3

)

 

 

(4.2

)

Net decrease/(increase) of allowance

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

(1.8

)

Translation difference

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

(0.3

)

Allowance at end of period

 

 

(7.3

)

 

 

(6.3

)

Receivables, net of allowance

 

$

1,652.1

 

 

$

1,696.7

 

Changestherefore the finance lease cost components have not been disclosed in the contract assets and the contract liabilities balances during the period are as follows:tables below.

Lease cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Year ended December 31

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Operating lease cost

 

$

44

 

 

$

46

 

Short-term lease cost

 

 

10

 

 

 

8

 

Variable lease cost

 

 

4

 

 

 

2

 

Sublease income

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(2

)

Total lease cost

 

$

57

 

 

$

55

 

Other information

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Year ended or as of
December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities

 

$

46

 

 

$

46

 

Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities

 

 

41

 

 

 

48

 

Weighted-average remaining lease term - operating leases

 

7 years

 

 

6 years

 

Weighted-average discount rate - operating leases

 

 

2.1

%

 

 

1.9

%

Maturities of operating lease liabilities (undiscounted cash flows) are as follows:

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Maturities

 

2022

 

$

38

 

2023

 

 

28

 

2024

 

 

19

 

2025

 

 

14

 

2026

 

 

11

 

Thereafter

 

 

33

 

Total operating lease payments

 

 

142

 

Less imputed interest

 

 

(11

)

Total operating lease liabilities

 

$

132

 

67


Change in Contract Balances with Customers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2018

 

 

 

Contract assets

 

 

Contract liabilities

 

Beginning balance

 

$

 

 

$

33.0

 

Increases/(decreases) due to cumulative catch up

   adjustment

 

 

15.0

 

 

 

 

Increases/(decreases) due to revenue recognized

 

 

75.6

 

 

 

(7.4

)

Increases/(decreases) due to cash received

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increases/(decreases) due to transfer to receivables

 

 

(71.1

)

 

 

 

Translation difference

 

 

 

 

 

3.8

 

Ending balance

 

$

19.5

 

 

$

29.4

 

The increases/(decreases) in the table above related to contracts assets reflect the total adjustments needed to align revenue recognition for work completed but not billed at year end.

5.4. Fair Value Measurements

ASSETS AND LIABILITIES MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A RECURRING BASIS

The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, other current liabilities and short-term debt approximate their fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.

The Company uses derivative financial instruments, “derivatives”, as part of its debt management to mitigate the market risk that occurs from its exposure to changes in interest and foreign exchange rates. The Company does not enter into derivatives for trading or other speculative purposes. The Company’s use of derivatives is in accordance with the strategies contained in the Company’s overall financial policy. All derivatives are recognized in the consolidated financial statements at fair value. Certain derivatives are from time to time designated either as fair value hedges or cash flow hedges in line with the hedge accounting criteria. For certain other derivatives hedge accounting is not applied either because non-hedge accounting treatment creates the same accounting result or the hedge does not meet the hedge accounting requirements, although entered into applying the same rationale concerning mitigating market risk that occurs from changes in interest and foreign exchange rates.

The degree of judgment utilized in measuring the fair value of the instruments generally correlates to the level of pricing observability. Pricing observability is impacted by a number ofseveral factors, including the type of asset or liability, whether the asset or liability has an established market and the characteristics specific to the transaction. Instruments with readily active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of pricing observability and a lesser degree of judgment utilized in measuring fair value. Conversely, assets rarely traded or not quoted will generally have less, or no, pricing observability and a higher degree of judgment utilized in measuring fair value.


Under existingU.S. GAAP, there is a disclosure framework hierarchy associated with the level of pricing observability utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value. The three broad levels defined by the hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1 - Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date.

Level 2 - Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities include items for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently, and items that are fair valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed.

Level 3 - Assets and liabilities that have little to no pricing observability as of the reported date. These items do not have two-way markets and are measured using management’s best estimate of fair value, where the inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.

The Company’s derivatives are all classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and there were no transfers between the levels during this or comparable periods.hierarchy.

The tables below present information about the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the continuing operations as of December 31, 20182021 and December 31, 2017.2020. The carrying value is the same as the fair value as these instruments are recognized in the consolidated financial statements at fair value. Although the Company is party to close-out netting agreements (ISDA agreements) with all derivative counterparties, the fair values in the tables below and in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20182021 and December 31, 20172020 have been presented on a gross basis. According to the close-out netting agreements, transaction amounts payable to a counterparty on the same date and in the same currency can be netted. The amounts subject to netting agreements that the Company choose not to offset are presented below.

DERIVATIVES DESIGNATED AS HEDGING INSTRUMENTS

There were no0 derivatives designated as hedging instruments as of December 31, 20182021 and December 31, 20172020 related to the continuing operations.

68


DERIVATIVES NOT DESIGNATED AS HEDGING INSTRUMENTS

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments, relate to economic hedges and are marked to market with all amounts recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Net Income. The derivatives not designated as hedging instruments outstanding at December 31, 20182021 and December 31, 20172020 were foreign exchange swaps.

For 2018,2021, the gains and losses recognized in other non-operating items, net are a loss of $1.5$33 million for derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments. For 2017,2020, the Company recognized a gain of $1.2$19 million in other non-operating items, net for derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments. For 2016,2019, the Company recognized a gain of $1.3$4 million in other non-operating items, net for derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments. The realized part of the losses referred to above are reported under financing activities in the statement of cash flows. For 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, the gains and losses recognized as interest expense were immaterial.

 

DECEMBER 31, 2018

 

 

DECEMBER 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements

 

 

 

DECEMBER 31, 2021

 

 

DECEMBER 31, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative asset

 

 

Derivative liability

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative asset

 

 

Derivative liability

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements

 

 

 

Nominal

 

 

(Other current

 

 

(Other current

 

 

Nominal

 

 

(Other current

 

 

(Other current

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative asset

 

Derivative liability

 

 

 

Derivative asset

 

Derivative liability

 

Description

 

volume

 

 

assets)

 

 

liabilities)

 

 

volume

 

 

assets)

 

 

liabilities)

 

 

 

Nominal

 

(Other current

 

(Other current

 

Nominal

 

(Other current

 

(Other current

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

volume

 

 

assets)

 

 

liabilities)

 

 

volume

 

 

assets)

 

 

liabilities)

 

 

DERIVATIVES NOT DESIGNATED

AS HEDGING INSTRUMENTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange swaps, less

than 6 months

 

 

659.1

 

1)

 

1.9

 

2)

 

1.1

 

3)

 

468.2

 

4)

 

2.4

 

5)

 

0.3

 

6)

 

$

1,348

 

1)

$

5

 

2)

$

16

 

3)

$

1,463

 

4)

$

25

 

5)

$

3

 

6)

TOTAL DERIVATIVES NOT

DESIGNATED AS HEDGING

INSTRUMENTS

 

$

659.1

 

 

$

1.9

 

 

$

1.1

 

 

$

468.2

 

 

$

2.4

 

 

$

0.3

 

 

 

$

1,348

 

$

5

 

$

16

 

$

1,463

 

$

25

 

$

3

 

1) Net nominal amount after deducting for offsetting swaps under ISDA agreements is $1,326 million.

2) Net amount after deducting for offsetting swaps under ISDA agreements is $5 million.

3) Net amount after deducting for offsetting swaps under ISDA agreements is $16 million.

4) Net nominal amount after deducting for offsetting swaps under ISDA agreements is $1,463 million.

5) Net amount after deducting for offsetting swaps under ISDA agreements is $25 million.

6) Net amount after deducting for offsetting swaps under ISDA agreements is $3 million.

1)

Net nominal amount after deducting for offsetting swaps under ISDA agreements is $659.1 million.

2)

Net amount after deducting for offsetting swaps under ISDA agreements is $1.9 million.

3)

Net amount after deducting for offsetting swaps under ISDA agreements is $1.1 million.

4)

Net nominal amount after deducting for offsetting swaps under ISDA agreements is $468.2 million.

5)

Net amount after deducting for offsetting swaps under ISDA agreements is $2.4 million.

6)

Net amount after deducting for offsetting swaps under ISDA agreements is $0.3 million.


FAIR VALUE OF DEBT

The fair value of long-term debt is determined either from quoted market prices as provided by participants in the secondary market or for long-term debt without quoted market prices, estimated using a discounted cash flow method based on the Company’s current borrowing rates for similar types of financing. The fair value and carrying value of debt is summarized in the table below. The Company has determined that each of these fair value measurements of debt reside within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

On June 18, 2018, Autoliv announced that it priced a 5-year bond offering of EUR 500 million in the Eurobond market (the “Notes”). The Notes were issued on June 26, 2018, at an issue price of 99.527%, and carry a coupon of 0.75% (paid annually in arrears), which implies a per annum yield of 0.847%.

The fair value and carrying value of debt for the continuing operations are summarized in the table below (dollars in millions).

 

DECEMBER 31, 2018

 

 

DECEMBER 31, 2018

 

 

DECEMBER 31, 2017

 

 

DECEMBER 31, 2017

 

 

DECEMBER 31, 2021

 

 

DECEMBER 31, 2020

 

 

CARRYING VALUE1)

 

 

FAIR VALUE

 

 

CARRYING VALUE1)

 

 

FAIR VALUE

 

 

CARRYING
VALUE
1)

 

 

FAIR
VALUE

 

 

CARRYING
VALUE
1)

 

 

FAIR
VALUE

 

LONG-TERM DEBT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Private placement

 

$

1,041.0

 

 

$

1,061.1

 

 

$

1,310.5

 

 

$

1,379.9

 

Eurobond

 

 

568.0

 

 

 

567.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bonds

 

$

1,330

 

$

1,400

 

$

1,377

 

$

1,483

 

Loans

 

332

 

347

 

733

 

753

 

Other long-term debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

TOTAL

 

$

1,609.0

 

 

$

1,628.9

 

 

$

1,310.7

 

 

$

1,380.1

 

 

$

1,662

 

$

1,747

 

$

2,110

 

$

2,237

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SHORT-TERM DEBT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial paper

 

$

342.6

 

 

$

342.6

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Short-term portion of long-term debt

 

 

268.1

 

 

 

270.4

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

332

 

333

 

275

 

279

 

Overdrafts and other short-term debt

 

 

10.0

 

 

 

10.0

 

 

 

19.5

 

 

 

19.5

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

27

 

TOTAL

 

$

620.7

 

 

$

623.0

 

 

$

19.7

 

 

$

19.7

 

 

$

346

 

$

348

 

$

302

 

$

305

 

1) Debt as reported in balance sheet.

1)

Debt as reported in balance sheet.

ASSETS AND LIABILITIES MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A NON-RECURRING BASIS

In addition to assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the Company also has assets and liabilities in its balance sheet that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis including certain long-lived assets, including equity method investments, goodwill and other intangible assets, typically as it relates to impairment.

The Company has determined that the fair value measurements included in each of these assets and liabilities rely primarily on Company-specific inputs and the Company’s assumptions about the use of the assets and settlements of liabilities, as observable inputs are not available. The Company has determined that each of these fair value measurements reside within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. To determine the fair value of long-lived assets as of the reporting date, the Company utilizes the projected cash flows expected to be generated by the long-lived assets, then discounts the future cash flows over the expected life of the long-lived assets.

For 2018-2016,the period 2019-2021, the Company did not0t record any material impairment charges on its long-lived assets for its continuing operations.

69


6.

5. Income Taxes

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES (Dollars in millions)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

U.S.

 

$

(38

)

 

$

(102

)

 

$

67

 

Non-U.S.

 

 

652

 

 

 

393

 

 

 

582

 

Total

 

$

614

 

 

$

291

 

 

$

648

 

PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES (Dollars in millions)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Current

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. federal

 

$

8

 

 

$

(41

)

 

$

19

 

Non-U.S.

 

 

191

 

 

 

169

 

 

 

178

 

U.S. state and local

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. federal

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(6

)

 

 

(3

)

Non-U.S.

 

 

(10

)

 

 

(17

)

 

 

(13

)

U.S. state and local

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(1

)

Total income tax expense

 

$

177

 

 

$

103

 

 

$

186

 

EFFECTIVE INCOME TAX RATE (%)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

U.S. federal income tax rate

 

 

21.0

 

%

 

21.0

 

%

 

21.0

 

%

Non-Deductible Expenses

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

3.0

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

Foreign tax rate variances

 

 

3.1

 

 

 

8.4

 

 

 

4.1

 

 

Tax credits

 

 

(2.2

)

 

 

(3.2

)

 

 

(1.7

)

 

Current year losses with no benefit

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

7.1

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

Net operating loss carry-forwards

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

Changes in tax reserves

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

1.7

 

 

Provision to Return

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

(8.8

)

 

 

(2.3

)

 

Earnings of equity investments

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

(0.1

)

 

Withholding taxes

 

 

4.5

 

 

 

8.5

 

 

 

2.4

 

 

State taxes, net of federal benefit

 

 

(0.5

)

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

0.4

 

 

Tax Audits

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

U.S. FDII Deduction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.5

)

 

U.S. GILI Tax

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.8

 

 

Other, net

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

(1.5

)

 

 

1.4

 

 

Effective income tax rate

 

 

28.9

 

%

 

35.3

 

%

 

28.6

 

%

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

U.S.

 

$

47.0

 

 

$

89.0

 

 

$

172.0

 

Non-U.S.

 

 

565.4

 

 

 

703.4

 

 

 

612.2

 

Total

 

$

612.4

 

 

$

792.4

 

 

$

784.2

 

PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Current

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. federal

 

$

31.6

 

 

$

53.4

 

 

$

79.2

 

Non-U.S.

 

 

192.7

 

 

 

162.8

 

 

 

167.6

 

U.S. state and local

 

 

10.1

 

 

 

9.9

 

 

 

3.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. federal

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

21.8

 

 

 

(15.8

)

Non-U.S.

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

(44.4

)

 

 

(9.7

)

U.S. state and local

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

(0.5

)

Total income tax expense

 

$

234.9

 

 

$

204.4

 

 

$

224.3

 


70


EFFECTIVE INCOME TAX RATE

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

U.S. federal income tax rate

 

 

21.0

 

%

 

35.0

 

%

 

35.0

 

%

Foreign tax rate variances

 

 

5.5

 

 

 

(7.4

)

 

 

(6.4

)

 

Tax credits

 

 

(3.9

)

 

 

(3.3

)

 

 

(2.8

)

 

Change in Valuation Allowances

 

 

(3.2

)

 

 

(4.8

)

 

 

1.3

 

 

Current year losses with no benefit

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

Net operating loss carry-forwards

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(3.7

)

 

 

(3.4

)

 

Changes in tax reserves

 

 

3.4

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

U.S. Expense Allocation

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

Earnings of equity investments

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(0.1

)

 

Withholding taxes

 

 

3.5

 

 

 

2.1

 

 

 

2.5

 

 

State taxes, net of federal benefit

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

Antitrust settlement

 

 

9.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. GILTI Tax

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in U.S. tax rate

 

 

 

 

 

3.0

 

 

 

 

 

Deemed mandatory repatriation

 

 

 

 

 

3.1

 

 

 

 

 

Other, net

 

 

(0.9

)

 

 

(1.5

)

 

 

(1.4

)

 

Effective income tax rate

 

 

38.4

 

%

 

25.8

 

%

 

28.6

 

%

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) was enacted on December 22, 2017. The Tax Act makes broad and complex changes to the U.S. tax code, including reducing the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% for years beginning after December 31, 2017, requiring companies to pay a one-time transition tax on earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that were previously deferred and created new taxes on certain foreign sourced earnings. The SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) on December 22, 2017. SAB 118 was issued to address the application of U.S. GAAP in situations when a registrant did not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act. In 2017, we made a reasonable estimate of the effects on our existing deferred tax balances and the one-time transition tax and recorded provisional amounts. In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company filed its 2017 Federal and State tax returns and finalized calculations related to transition tax and deferred tax assets and liabilities previously recorded in the year ended December 31, 2017.

Final Impacts from the Tax Act

Deferred tax assets and liabilities: In December 2017, we remeasured certain deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rates at which they were expected to reverse in the future, which is generally 21%. There was not a material difference between the provisional amounts recorded for deferred tax assets and liabilities in December 2017 and the final amounts updated in the fourth quarter 2018 after the completion of the 2017 tax returns.

Foreign tax effects: The one-time transition tax is based on our total post-1986 earnings and profits (E&P) that we previously deferred from U.S. income taxes. In December 2017, we recorded a provisional amount of income tax expense for the one-time transition tax.  The final amount reported on the 2017 tax returns was not materially different from the amount previously recorded.  However, due to the uncertainties inherent in the calculations of the transition tax and the determination of more than twenty years of E&P history, in the fourth quarter of 2018, we have recorded a tax reserve of $24 million related to the transition tax. No additional income taxes have been provided for any remaining undistributed foreign earnings not subject to the transition tax, or any additional outside basis difference inherent in these entities, as these amounts continue to be indefinitely reinvested in foreign operations. Determining the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability relating to any remaining outside basis difference in these entities (i.e., basis difference in excess of that subject to the one-time transition tax) is not practical.

Global Intangible Low Taxed Income (“GILTI”): The Tax Act created a new requirement that certain income (i.e., GILTI) earned by foreign subsidiaries must be included currently in the gross income of the U.S. shareholder. Under U.S. GAAP, we are permitted to make an accounting policy election to either treat taxes due on future inclusions in U.S. taxable income related to GILTI as a current-period expense when incurred or to factor such amounts into our measurement of our deferred taxes. We have elected to treat the impact of GILTI as a current-period expense when incurred. In 2018, the negative impact of GILTI on our effective tax rate is approximately 1.7% due to the cost of expenses allocated against GILTI that limit the foreign tax credits available for offset against the U.S. tax cost on the GILTI inclusion.    

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. On December 31, 2018,2021, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards (NOL’s) of approximately $283$344 million, of which approximately $266$340 million have no expiration date. The remaining losses expire on various dates through 2029.2025. The Company also has $9$25 million of U.S. Foreign Tax Credit carry forwards, which begin to expire in 2026 and $7 million of U.S. capital loss carryforwards which begin to expire in 2022.


.

Valuation allowances have been established which partially offset the related deferred assets. Such allowances are primarily provided against NOL’s of companies that have perennially incurred losses, as well as the NOL’s of companies that are start-up operations and have not established a pattern of profitability. The Company assesses all available evidence, both positive and negative, to determine the amount of any required valuation allowance. In 2018, the Company recognized a tax benefit of $37 million due to the reversal of valuation allowances. This consisted primarily of the reversal of valuation allowances on deferred tax assets, net operating loss carryforwards, and foreign tax credits in Sweden and the reversal of valuation allowances against foreign tax credit carryforwards in the U.S. that were utilized in the final calculation of the transition tax.

The foreign tax rate variance reflects the fact that approximately two-thirds of the Company’s non-U.S. pre-tax income is generated by business operations located in tax jurisdictions where the tax rate is between 20-30%20-30%. The tax rate from quarter to quarter and from year to year is also impacted by the mix of earnings and tax rates in various jurisdictions compared to the same periods or prior years.

The Company has reserves for income taxes that may become payable in future periods as a result of tax audits. These reserves represent the Company’s best estimate of the potential liability for tax exposures. Inherent uncertainties exist in estimates of tax exposures due to changes in tax law, both legislated and concluded through the various jurisdictions’ court systems. The Company files income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdiction, and various states and non-U.S. jurisdictions.

At any given time, the Company is undergoing tax audits in several tax jurisdictions, covering multiple years. The Company is no longer subject to income tax examination by the U.S. Federal tax authorities for years prior to 2015. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to income tax examination by U.S. state or local tax authorities or by non-U.S. tax authorities for years before 2010. The Company is undergoing tax audits in several non-U.S. jurisdictions and several U.S. state jurisdictions, covering multiple years. As of December 31, 2018,2021, as a result of those tax examinations, the Company is not aware of any proposed income tax adjustments that would have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements, however, other audits could result in additional increases or decreases to the unrecognized tax benefits in some future period or periods.

The Company recognizes interest and potential penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense. As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company had recorded $34.6$46 million for unrecognized tax benefits related to prior years, including $6.3$10 million of accrued interest and penalties. During 2018,2021, the Company recorded a net increasedecrease of $24.0$2 million to income tax reserves for unrecognized tax benefits related to the transition tax reported on the 2017 tax return due to uncertainty surrounding the calculations.positions taken in prior years. Also during 2018,2021, the Company recorded a net decreaseincrease of $4.2$5 million to income tax reserves for other unrecognized tax benefits based on tax positions related totaken in the current and prior years. year.

The Company had $6.6$11 million accrued for the payment of interest and penalties as of December 31, 2018.2021. Of the total unrecognized tax benefits of $54.4$49 million recorded at December 31, 2018, $4.02021, $15 million is classified as current income tax payable, and $50.4$34 million is classified as non-current tax payable included in Other Non-Current Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Substantially all of these reserves would impact the effective tax rate if released into income. The following table summarizes the activity related to the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits:benefits (dollars in millions):

71


UNRECOGNIZED TAX BENEFITS

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year

 

$

63

 

 

$

59

 

 

$

50

 

Increases as a result of tax positions taken during a prior
   period

 

 

3

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

4

 

Increases as a result of tax positions taken during the current
   period

 

 

5

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

6

 

Decreases as a result of tax positions taken during the
   current period

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities

 

 

(4

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Decreases resulting from the lapse of the applicable statute
   of limitations

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(1

)

Translation Difference

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(0

)

 

 

0

 

Total unrecognized tax benefits at end of year

 

$

65

 

 

$

63

 

 

$

59

 

UNRECOGNIZED TAX BENEFITS

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year

 

$

29.6

 

 

$

27.2

 

 

$

25.2

 

Increases as a result of tax positions taken during a prior

   period

 

 

24.0

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

 

4.5

 

Decreases as a result of tax positions taken during a prior

   period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.2

)

Increases as a result of tax positions taken during the current

   period

 

 

4.7

 

 

 

6.8

 

 

 

5.8

 

Decreases as a result of tax positions taken during the

   current period

 

 

(3.1

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1.7

)

Decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities

 

 

(3.2

)

 

 

(7.1

)

 

 

(1.3

)

Decreases resulting from the lapse of the applicable statute

   of limitations

 

 

(1.5

)

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

(3.5

)

Translation Difference

 

 

(0.9

)

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

(1.6

)

Total unrecognized tax benefits at end of year

 

$

49.6

 

 

$

29.6

 

 

$

27.2

 


The tax effect of temporary differences and carryforwards that comprise significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows.follows (dollars in millions).

DEFERRED TAXES

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provisions

 

$

136

 

 

$

141

 

 

$

105

 

Costs capitalized for tax

 

 

29

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

26

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

 

0

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

10

 

Retirement Plans

 

 

46

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

61

 

Tax receivables, principally NOL’s

 

 

109

 

 

 

110

 

 

 

94

 

Deferred tax assets before allowances

 

 

320

 

 

 

336

 

 

 

295

 

Valuation allowances

 

 

(59

)

 

 

(68

)

 

 

(61

)

Total

 

$

261

 

 

$

268

 

 

$

234

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquired intangibles

 

$

0

 

 

$

(2

)

 

$

(4

)

Statutory tax allowances

 

 

(6

)

 

 

(0

)

 

 

(0

)

Distribution taxes

 

 

(6

)

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(15

)

Other

 

 

(3

)

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(7

)

Total

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(21

)

 

 

(26

)

Net deferred tax asset

 

$

246

 

 

$

247

 

 

$

208

 

DEFERRED TAXES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DECEMBER 31

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provisions

 

$

104.9

 

 

$

107.3

 

 

$

101.5

 

Costs capitalized for tax

 

 

18.2

 

 

 

18.6

 

 

 

16.8

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

 

13.0

 

 

 

14.2

 

 

 

18.2

 

Retirement Plans

 

 

50.1

 

 

 

50.0

 

 

 

65.5

 

Tax receivables, principally NOL’s

 

 

113.9

 

 

 

150.2

 

 

 

211.7

 

Deferred tax assets before allowances

 

$

300.1

 

 

$

340.3

 

 

$

413.7

 

Valuation allowances

 

 

(71.0

)

 

 

(110.6

)

 

 

(199.6

)

Total

 

$

229.1

 

 

$

229.7

 

 

$

214.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquired intangibles

 

$

(6.1

)

 

$

(6.6

)

 

$

(12.3

)

Statutory tax allowances

 

 

(0.5

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distribution taxes

 

 

(22.9

)

 

 

(22.8

)

 

 

(16.0

)

Other

 

 

(10.1

)

 

 

(3.9

)

 

 

(4.9

)

Total

 

$

(39.6

)

 

$

(33.3

)

 

$

(33.2

)

Net deferred tax asset

 

$

189.5

 

 

$

196.4

 

 

$

180.9

 

The following table summarizes the activity related to the Company’s valuation allowances:allowances (dollars in millions):

VALUATION ALLOWANCES AGAINST DEFERRED TAX ASSETS

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Allowances at beginning of year

 

$

68

 

 

$

61

 

 

$

71

 

Benefits reserved current year

 

 

5

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

4

 

Benefits recognized current year

 

 

(9

)

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(11

)

Translation difference

 

 

(5

)

 

 

(6

)

 

 

(4

)

Allowances at end of year

 

$

59

 

 

$

68

 

 

$

61

 

72


VALUATION ALLOWANCES AGAINST DEFERRED

TAX ASSETS DECEMBER 31

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Allowances at beginning of year

 

$

110.6

 

 

$

199.6

 

 

$

177.7

 

Benefits reserved current year

 

 

6.4

 

 

 

22.9

 

 

 

32.3

 

Benefits recognized current year

 

 

(36.9

)

 

 

(117.0

)

 

 

(13.8

)

Write-offs and other changes

 

 

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(0.5

)

Translation difference

 

 

(9.1

)

 

 

5.2

 

 

 

3.9

 

Allowances at end of year

 

$

71.0

 

 

$

110.6

 

 

$

199.6

 

6. Receivables

(Dollars in millions)

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Receivables

 

$

1,707

 

 

$

1,831

 

 

$

1,632

 

Allowance for credit loss at beginning of year

 

$

(12

)

 

$

(9

)

 

$

(7

)

Reversal of (addition to) allowance

 

 

(0

)

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(4

)

Write-off against allowance

 

 

4

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

2

 

Translation difference

 

 

1

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

0

 

Allowance for credit loss at end of year

 

$

(8

)

 

$

(12

)

 

$

(9

)

Total receivables, net of allowance

 

$

1,699

 

 

$

1,820

 

 

$

1,624

 

7. Receivables

Inventories

DECEMBER 31

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Receivables

 

$

1,659.4

 

 

$

1,703.0

 

 

$

1,519.3

 

Allowance at beginning of year

 

$

(6.3

)

 

$

(4.2

)

 

$

(3.9

)

Reversal of allowance

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

0.5

 

Addition to allowance

 

 

(3.8

)

 

 

(3.9

)

 

 

(1.5

)

Write-off against allowance

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

0.5

 

Translation difference

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

0.2

 

Allowance at end of year

 

$

(7.3

)

 

$

(6.3

)

 

$

(4.2

)

Total receivables, net of allowance

 

$

1,652.1

 

 

$

1,696.7

 

 

$

1,515.1

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Raw material

 

$

395

 

 

$

379

 

 

$

366

 

Work in progress

 

 

283

 

 

 

292

 

 

 

257

 

Finished products

 

 

190

 

 

 

220

 

 

 

200

 

Inventories

 

$

868

 

 

$

891

 

 

$

824

 

Inventory reserve at beginning of year

 

$

(93

)

 

$

(83

)

 

$

(85

)

Reversal of (addition to) reserve

 

 

(3

)

 

 

(3

)

 

 

6

 

Translation difference

 

 

5

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

(5

)

Inventory reserve at end of year

 

$

(91

)

 

$

(93

)

 

$

(83

)

Total inventories, net of reserve

 

$

777

 

 

$

798

 

 

$

741

 

8. Inventories

DECEMBER 31

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Raw material

 

$

370.9

 

 

$

333.2

 

 

$

286.4

 

Work in progress

 

 

277.4

 

 

 

263.8

 

 

 

233.1

 

Finished products

 

 

194.7

 

 

 

187.9

 

 

 

166.2

 

Inventories

 

$

843.0

 

 

$

784.9

 

 

$

685.7

 

Inventory reserve at beginning of year

 

$

(80.6

)

 

$

(76.7

)

 

$

(68.2

)

Reversal of reserve

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

4.8

 

 

 

2.9

 

Addition to reserve

 

 

(13.9

)

 

 

(7.3

)

 

 

(16.2

)

Write-off against reserve

 

 

5.3

 

 

 

5.2

 

 

 

3.0

 

Translation difference

 

 

2.7

 

 

 

(6.6

)

 

 

1.8

 

Inventory reserve at end of year

 

$

(85.1

)

 

$

(80.6

)

 

$

(76.7

)

Total inventories, net of reserve

 

$

757.9

 

 

$

704.3

 

 

$

609.0

 


9. Investments and8. Other Non-Current Assets

(Dollars in millions)

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Equity method investments

 

$

11

 

 

$

9

 

Deferred tax assets

 

 

271

 

 

 

281

 

Income tax receivables

 

 

20

 

 

 

28

 

Insurance receivables

 

 

127

 

 

 

105

 

Other non-current assets

 

 

51

 

 

 

44

 

Total other non-current assets

 

$

481

 

 

$

466

 

DECEMBER 31

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Equity method investments

 

$

12.5

 

 

$

12.9

 

Deferred tax assets

 

 

235.6

 

 

 

248.9

 

Income tax receivables

 

 

33.6

 

 

 

30.4

 

Other non-current assets

 

 

41.8

 

 

 

48.8

 

Investments and other non-current assets

 

$

323.5

 

 

$

341.0

 

As of December 31, 2018,2021 and 2020, the Company had one1 equity method investment.

The Company has ownership of 49%49% in Autoliv-Hirotako Safety Sdn, Bhd (parent and subsidiaries) in Malaysia which it currently does not control, but in which it exercises significant influence over operations and financial position.

10.73


9. Property, Plant and Equipment

(Dollars in millions)

 

December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

Estimated life

Land and land improvements

 

$

147

 

 

$

121

 

 

n/a to 15

Buildings

 

 

957

 

 

 

962

 

 

20-40

Machinery and equipment

 

 

4,193

 

 

 

4,208

 

 

3-12

Construction in progress

 

 

354

 

 

 

314

 

 

n/a

Property, plant and equipment

 

$

5,651

 

 

$

5,605

 

 

 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

 

(3,796

)

 

 

(3,736

)

 

 

Net of depreciation

 

$

1,855

 

 

$

1,869

 

 

 

DEPRECIATION INCLUDED IN

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Cost of sales

 

$

348

 

 

$

327

 

 

$

307

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

13

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

13

 

Research, development and engineering expenses, net

 

 

23

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

19

 

Total

 

$

384

 

 

$

361

 

 

$

339

 

DECEMBER 31

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

Estimated

life

Land and land improvements

 

$

114.7

 

 

$

113.4

 

 

n/a to 15

Machinery and equipment

 

 

3,496.8

 

 

 

3,276.1

 

 

3-8

Buildings

 

 

822.9

 

 

 

816.2

 

 

20-40

Construction in progress

 

 

374.3

 

 

 

370.6

 

 

n/a

Property, plant and equipment

 

$

4,808.7

 

 

$

4,576.3

 

 

 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

 

(3,118.6

)

 

 

(2,967.4

)

 

 

Net of depreciation

 

$

1,690.1

 

 

$

1,608.9

 

 

 

DEPRECIATION INCLUDED IN

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Cost of sales

 

$

300.9

 

 

$

268.9

 

 

$

248.3

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

13.9

 

 

 

12.5

 

 

 

8.6

 

Research, development and engineering expenses, net

 

 

15.9

 

 

 

14.5

 

 

 

12.7

 

Total

 

$

330.7

 

 

$

295.9

 

 

$

269.6

 

NoNaN significant fixed asset impairments related to the Company’s continuing operations were recognized during 2018, 20172021, 2020 or 2016.2019.

The net book value of machinery and equipment and buildings and land under capitalfinance lease contracts recorded at December 31, 20182021 and December 31, 20172020 were immaterial. The amortization expense related to capitalfinance leases is included with depreciation expenses disclosed in the table above.

11.10. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

GOODWILL (Dollars in millions)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Carrying amount at beginning of year

 

$

1,398

 

 

$

1,388

 

Translation differences

 

 

(11

)

 

 

10

 

Carrying amount at end of year

 

$

1,387

 

 

$

1,398

 

GOODWILL

2018

 

 

2017

 

Carrying amount at beginning of year

$

1,397.0

 

 

$

1,380.6

 

Translation differences

 

(7.1

)

 

 

16.4

 

Carrying amount at end of year

$

1,389.9

 

 

$

1,397.0

 

Approximately $1.2$1.2 billion of the Company’s goodwill is associated with the 1997 merger of Autoliv AB and the Automotive Safety Products Division of Morton International, Inc. NoNaN goodwill impairment charges were recognized in continuing operations during 2018, 20172021, 2020 or 2016.2019.

AMORTIZABLE INTANGIBLES (Dollars in millions)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Gross carrying amount

 

$

398

 

 

$

407

 

Accumulated amortization

 

 

(390

)

 

 

(393

)

Carrying value

 

$

8

 

 

$

14

 

AMORTIZABLE INTANGIBLES

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Gross carrying amount

 

$

391.6

 

 

$

355.0

 

Accumulated amortization

 

 

(358.9

)

 

 

(312.4

)

Carrying value

 

$

32.7

 

 

$

42.6

 

At December 31, 2018,2021, intangible assets subject to amortization mainly relate to acquired technology. No significant impairments of intangible assets were recognized during 2018, 20172021, 2020 or 2016.2019.

Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $11.3$10 million, $11.2$10 million and $10.5$12 million in 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. Estimated future amortization expense is (in millions): 2019: $11.6; 2020: $10.2; 2021: $9.1;is: 2022: $1.2$3 million; 2023: $3 million; 2024: $2 million; 2025: $0 million and 2023: $0.6.2026: $0 million.

74


11. Restructuring

12. Restructuring

Restructuring provisions are made on a case-by-case basis and primarily include severance costs incurred in connection with headcount reductions and plant consolidations. Restructuring costs other than employee related costs are immaterial for all periods presented and are included in the table below. The Company expects to finance restructuring programs over the next several years through cash


generated from its ongoing operations or through cash available under its existing credit facilities. The Company does not expect that the execution of these programs will have an adverse impact on its liquidity position. The changes in the employee-related reserves have been charged against Other income (expense), net in the Consolidated Statements of Net Income.

The majority of therestructuring reserve balance asis included within Accrued expenses in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(Dollars in millions)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Reserve at beginning of the period

 

$

126

 

 

$

56

 

 

$

33

 

Provision - charge

 

$

39

 

 

$

109

 

 

$

57

 

Provision - reversal

 

$

(31

)

 

$

(10

)

 

$

(3

)

Cash payments

 

$

(37

)

 

$

(38

)

 

$

(30

)

Translation difference

 

$

(8

)

 

$

9

 

 

$

(1

)

Reserve at end of the period

 

$

88

 

 

$

126

 

 

$

56

 

As of December 31, 2018 pertains to restructuring activities initiated in Western Europe in the past few years. The Company anticipates that its restructuring initiatives in Western Europe for a number of plants, none of which are individually or in the aggregate material as of December 31, 2018, will continue through dates ranging from 2019 through 2021. The total amount of costs expected to be incurred in connection with these restructuring activities ranges from2021, approximately $11 million to $31 million for each individual activity. In the aggregate, the cost for these Western European restructuring initiatives is approximately $109 million and the remaining restructuring liability as of December 31, 2018 is approximately $27$15 million out of the $33$88 million in total reserve balance.

2018

In 2018,balance can be attributed to the employee-related restructuring provisions, made on a case-by-case basis, related mainly to headcount reductions in high-cost countries in Western Europe. Cash payments related mainly to high-cost countries in Western Europe. The table below summarizes the changestructural efficiency program initiated in the balance sheet positionsecond quarter of 2020. This program is expected to be concluded in 2022. Approximately $52 million of the total reserve balance can be attributed to footprint optimization activities in Europe, initiated in the third quarter of 2020 and expected to be concluded in 2023, and in Asia, initiated in the fourth quarter of 2021 and expected to be concluded in 2022.

The restructuring reserves from December 31, 2017charges in 2021 of $39 million mainly relates to December 31, 2018footprint optimization activities primarily in Asia. Reversals are mainly related to the continuing operations.

 

 

December 31

 

 

Provision/

 

 

Provision/

 

 

Cash

 

 

Translation

 

 

December 31

 

 

 

2017

 

 

Charge

 

 

Reversal

 

 

payments

 

 

difference

 

 

2018

 

Restructuring employee-related

 

$

39.4

 

 

$

9.0

 

 

$

(0.1

)

 

$

(13.6

)

 

$

(1.5

)

 

$

33.2

 

Other

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

0.2

 

Total reserve

 

$

39.6

 

 

$

9.2

 

 

$

(0.1

)

 

$

(13.6

)

 

$

(1.7

)

 

$

33.4

 

2017

In 2017, the employee-related restructuring provisions, made on a case-by-case basis, and cash payments related mainly to headcount reductions in high-cost countries in Western Europe and Japan. The table below summarizes the changestructural efficiency program initiated in the balance sheet positionsecond quarter of the restructuring reserves from December 31, 2016 to December 31, 20172020. Cash payments in 2021 are related to the continuing operations.

 

 

December 31

 

 

Provision/

 

 

Provision/

 

 

Cash

 

 

Translation

 

 

December 31

 

 

 

2016

 

 

Charge

 

 

Reversal

 

 

payments

 

 

difference

 

 

2017

 

Restructuring employee-related

 

$

35.7

 

 

$

29.3

 

 

$

(6.9

)

 

$

(23.3

)

 

$

4.6

 

 

$

39.4

 

Other

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

0.2

 

Total reserve

 

$

35.8

 

 

$

29.5

 

 

$

(6.9

)

 

$

(23.3

)

 

$

4.5

 

 

$

39.6

 

2016

In 2015, the employee-related restructuring provisions, made on a case-by-case basis, and cash payments related mainly to headcount reductions in high-cost countries in Western Europe and Korea. The table below summarizes the changestructural efficiency program initiated in the balance sheet positionsecond quarter of the2020 and other footprint activities.

The restructuring reserves from December 31, 2015 to December 31, 2016charges in 2020 of $109 million, mainly related to the continuing operations.structural efficiency program initiated in the second quarter of 2020 in the Americas and Europe, and footprint optimization activities in Europe initiated in the third quarter of 2020. Cash payments in 2020 mainly related to the structural efficiency program initiated in 2019.

The restructuring charges in 2019 of $57 million mainly related to the structural efficiency program initiated in the second quarter of 2019. Cash payments in 2019 mainly related to the structural efficiency program initiated in 2019.

 

 

December 31

 

 

Provision/

 

 

Provision/

 

 

Cash

 

 

Translation

 

 

December 31

 

 

 

2015

 

 

Charge

 

 

Reversal

 

 

payments

 

 

difference

 

 

2016

 

Restructuring employee-related

 

$

86.9

 

 

$

23.6

 

 

$

(2.6

)

 

$

(71.3

)

 

$

(0.9

)

 

$

35.7

 

Other

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

0.1

 

Total reserve

 

$

87.1

 

 

$

23.7

 

 

$

(2.6

)

 

$

(71.3

)

 

$

(1.1

)

 

$

35.8

 

13.12. Product Related Liabilities

Autoliv is exposed to product liability and warranty claims in the event that the Company’s products fail to perform as represented and such failure results, or is alleged to result, in bodily injury, and/or property damage or other loss. The Company has reserves for product risks. Such reserves are related to product performance issues including recall, product liability and warranty issues. For further information, see Note 18.17.

The Company records liabilities for product related risks when probable claims are identified and when it is possible to reasonably estimate costs. ProvisionsChanges in reserve for warranty claims are estimated based on prior experience, likely changes in performance of newer products, and the mix and volume of the products sold. The provisionschanges in reserve are recorded on an accrual basis.


Pursuant to the Spin-off Agreements, Autoliv is also required to indemnify Veoneer for recalls related to certain qualified Electronics products. At December 31, 2018,2021, the reserves for indemnification liabilities arewere approximately $12$9 million and were included within accrued expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Insurance receivables are included within Other current assets

Of the cash payments in 2021 the main part was related to the previously disclosed "Toyota Recall" issue. In 2020, the change in reserve mainly related to recall related issues, whereof the “Toyota Recall” represented the major recall issue. In 2019, the change in the Condensedreserve mainly related to other recall and warranty related issues. In 2020 and 2019, cash payments primarily relate to recall and warranty related issues. The reserve for product related liabilities is included in accrued expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The decrease in reserves in 2018 was mainly due to a lower recalls and higher cash payments. A majority of the Company’s recall related issues as of December 31, 20182021 are covered by insurance. Insurance receivables are included within other current and non-current assets inon the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The decrease in reserves in 2017 was mainly due to a decrease in recallAs of December 31, 2021, the Company had total insurance receivables related issues and payments, while the increase in reserves in 2016 was mainly due to recall related issues. Cash payments in 2018 were mainly recall related. Cash payments in 2017 were mainly recall related, while 2016 were mainly warranty related.issues of $138 million ($343 million as of December 31, 2020).

The table below summarizes the change in the balance sheet position of the product related liabilities.liabilities (dollars in millions).

(Dollars in millions)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Reserve at beginning of the year

 

$

341

 

 

$

72

 

 

$

62

 

Change in reserve

 

 

49

 

 

 

304

 

 

 

39

 

Cash payments

 

 

(245

)

 

 

(36

)

 

 

(29

)

Translation difference

 

 

(1

)

 

 

1

 

 

 

(0

)

Reserve at end of the year

 

$

144

 

 

$

341

 

 

$

72

 

75


 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Reserve at beginning of the year

 

$

95.6

 

 

$

90.6

 

 

$

39.0

 

Change in reserve

 

 

20.6

 

 

 

32.2

 

 

 

68.1

 

Cash payments

 

 

(54.3

)

 

 

(29.4

)

 

 

(15.6

)

Translation difference

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

(0.9

)

Reserve at end of the year

 

$

62.2

 

 

$

95.6

 

 

$

90.6

 

14.13. Debt and Credit Agreements

SHORT-TERM DEBT

As of December 31, 2018,2021 and 2020, total short-term debt was $621 million. Short-term$346 million and $302 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2021, short-term debt consisted mainly of $208a $332 million U.S. Private Placement(SEK 3,000 million) loan maturing in April 2019, $60 million U.S. Private Placement loan maturing in November 2019, and $343 million commercial paper loans with maturities in Q1 and Q2 2019.from Swedish Export Credit Corporation.

The Company’s subsidiaries have credit agreements, principally in the form of overdraft facilities with several local banks. Total available short-term facilities as of December 31, 2018,2021, excluding commercial paper facilities as described below, amounted to $381$428 million, of which approximately $10$14 million was utilized. The weighted average interest rate on total short-term debt outstanding at December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, excluding the short-term portion of long-term debt, was 1.4%2% and 2.0%3%, respectively.

LONG-TERM DEBT

As of December 31, 2018,2021 and 2020, total long-term debt was $1,609 million.$1,662 million and $2,110 million, respectively.

In June 2020 the Company utilized its new SEK 6,000 million facility with Swedish Export Credit Corporation which was signed in May 2020. The SEK 6,000 million facility was utilized in two different loans. One SEK 3,000 million loan maturing in 2022 carrying a floating interest rate of 3M STIBOR +1.35% and one SEK 3,000 million loan maturing in 2025 carrying a floating interest rate of 3M STIBOR +1.85%.

In June 2018, the Company also issued EUR 500 million of 5-year5-year notes in the Eurobond market. The notes carry a coupon of 0.75%0.75%.

In 2014, the Company issuedlong-term debt securities in a U.S. Private Placement. The currentAs of December 31, 2021 the total long-term debt outstanding from the 2014 issuance of $767 million consist of; $275of: $297 million aggregate principal amount of 7-year10-year senior notes with an interest rate of 3.51%4.09%; $297$285 million aggregate principal amount of 10-year12-year senior notes with an interest rate of 4.09%4.24%; $285and $185 million aggregate principal amount of 12-year15-year senior notes with an interest rate of 4.24%; and $185 million aggregate principal amount of 15-year senior notes with an interest rate of 4.44%4.44%.

CREDIT FACILITIES

In July 2016, the Company signed a $1,100$1,100 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility with 14 banks. The term of the facility was 5 years with two2 one-year extension options. The Company has utilized these extension options and extended the maturity to July 2023.2023. The Company pays a commitment fee on the undrawn amount. The commitment fee is 35%35% of the applicable margin. The applicable margin is related to the Company’s credit rating. Given the Company’s current credit rating of A-BBB from S&P Global Ratings, the applicable margin is 0.225%0.375%. As of December 31, 2018, and December 31, 2017,2021, the facility was unutilized.not utilized.

The Company has a €3,000 million Euro Medium Term Note Program in place for being able to issue notes to be traded on the Global Exchange Market of Euronext Dublin. At December 31, 2021, no notes had been issued under this program.

The Company has two commercial paper programs: one SEK 7 billion (approx. $780$774 million) Swedish program and one $1.0a $1 billion U.S. program. At December 31, 2018 a total of $343 million had2021 no commercial papers have been issued under these programs. Both programs were unutilized at December 31, 2017.

The Company is not subject to any financial covenants, i.e. performance related restrictions, in any of its significant long-term borrowings or commitments.


CREDIT RISK

In the Company’s financial operations, credit risk arises in connection with cash deposits with banks and when entering into forward exchange agreements, swap contracts or other financial instruments. In order to reduce this risk, deposits and financial instruments are only entered with a limited number of banks up to a calculated risk amount of $150$200 million per bank for banks rated A- or above and up to $50$50 million for banks rated BBB+. The policy of the Company is to work with banks that have a strong credit rating and that participate in the Company’s financing. In addition to this, deposits of up to an aggregate amount of $2$2 billion can be placed in U.S. and Swedish government paper and in certain AAA rated money market funds. As of December 31, 2018,2021, the Company had placed $1$579 million in money market funds.

The table below shows debt maturity as cash flow. For a description of hedging instruments used as part of debt management, see the Financial Instruments section of Note 2 and Note 5.4.

DEBT PROFILE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

PRINCIPAL AMOUNT BY EXPECTED MATURITY
(dollars in millions)

 

2022

 

 

2023

 

 

2024

 

 

2025

 

 

2026

 

 

Thereafter

 

 

long-
term

 

 

Total

 

 

Bonds

 

$

 

 

$

565

 

 

$

297

 

 

$

 

 

$

285

 

 

$

185

 

 

$

1,332

 

 

$

1,332

 

 

Loans

 

 

332

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

332

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

332

 

 

 

664

 

 

Commercial papers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other short-term debt

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14

 

 

Total principal amount

 

$

346

 

 

$

565

 

 

$

297

 

 

$

332

 

 

$

285

 

 

$

185

 

 

$

1,664

 

 

$

2,010

 

1)

1) The difference between reported total debt and total principal amount is mainly related to capitalized debt issuance costs.

76


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

PRINCIPAL AMOUNT BY EXPECTED MATURITY

 

2019

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2022

 

 

2023

 

 

Thereafter

 

 

long-

term

 

 

Total

 

 

Eurobond

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

572.7

 

 

$

 

 

$

572.7

 

 

$

572.7

 

 

U.S. private placement notes

 

$

268.0

 

 

$

 

 

$

275.0

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

767.0

 

 

$

1,042.0

 

 

$

1,310.0

 

 

Commercial papers

 

$

342.6

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

342.6

 

 

Other short-term debt

 

$

10.1

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

10.1

 

 

Total principal amount

 

$

620.7

 

 

$

 

 

$

275.0

 

 

$

 

 

$

572.7

 

 

$

767.0

 

 

$

1,614.7

 

 

$

2,235.4

 

1)

1)

The difference between reported total debt and total principal amount is mainly related to capitalized debt issuance costs.

15.14. Shareholders’ Equity

The number of shares outstanding as of December 31, 20182021 was 87,144,520.

87,483,781.

DIVIDENDS

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Cash dividend paid per share

 

$

2.46

 

 

$

2.38

 

 

$

2.30

 

Cash dividend declared per share

 

$

2.48

 

 

$

2.40

 

 

$

2.32

 

DIVIDENDS

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Cash dividend paid per share

 

$

1.88

 

 

$

0.62

 

 

$

2.48

 

Cash dividend declared per share

 

$

1.88

 

 

$

 

 

$

2.48

 

 

 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS / ENDING BALANCE1) (Dollars in millions)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Cumulative translation adjustments

 

$

(355

)

 

$

(269

)

 

$

(365

)

Net pension liability

 

 

(52

)

 

 

(78

)

 

 

(84

)

Total (ending balance)

 

$

(408

)

 

$

(347

)

 

$

(449

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred taxes on the pension liability

 

$

15

 

 

$

23

 

 

$

25

 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)/ ENDING BALANCE1)

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Cumulative translation adjustments

 

$

(381.2

)

 

$

(230.5

)

 

$

(493.5

)

Net (loss) gain of cash flow hedge derivatives

 

 

 

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

8.1

 

Net pension liability

 

 

(55.0

)

 

 

(56.2

)

 

 

(80.1

)

Distribution to Veoneer

 

 

13.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total (ending balance)

 

$

(423.2

)

 

$

(287.5

)

 

$

(565.5

)

Deferred taxes on the pension liability

 

$

15.4

 

 

$

16.5

 

 

$

35.3

 

1) The components of Other Comprehensive Loss are net of any related income tax effects.

1)

The components of Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) are net of any related income tax effects.

SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM

The Company’sOn December 31, 2021, the stock repurchase program authorized by the Board of Directors in 2014 expired with approximately 3 million shares remaining. In November 2021, the Board of Directors approved a sharenew stock repurchase program in 2000 authorizingthat authorizes the Company to repurchase of 10up to $1.5 billion or up to 17 million shares (whichever comes first) between January 2022 and subsequently expanded the authorization four times between 2000 and 2014 to 47.5 million shares. There were no share repurchases made during 2018. The Company made repurchases during the second quarterend of 2017. There is no expiration date for the share repurchase program. The Company is authorized to repurchase an additional 2,986,288 shares under the program at December 31, 2018.2024.

SHARES

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Shares repurchased (shares in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for shares

 

$

 

 

$

157.0

 

 

$

 

In total, Autoliv has repurchased 44.5 million shares between May 2000 and December 2018 for cash of $2,498 million, including commissions. Of the total amount of repurchased shares, 23.6 million shares were utilized for the equity unit offering during 2009-2012. In addition, 5.3 million shares have been utilized by the Stock Incentive Plan whereof 0.2 million, 0.2 million and 0.1 million were utilized during 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. At December 31, 2018, 15.7 million of the repurchased shares remain in treasury stock.


16.15. Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Payments for interest and income taxes were as follows:

(Dollars in millions)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Interest

 

$

60

 

 

$

73

 

 

$

72

 

Income taxes

 

 

207

 

 

 

104

 

 

 

192

 

77


 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Interest

 

$

66

 

 

$

64

 

 

$

64

 

Income taxes

 

$

214

 

 

$

204

 

 

$

247

 

17.16. Stock Incentive Plan

Eligible employees and non-employee directors of Autoliv participate in the Autoliv, Inc.1997Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, (the Plan)as amended and received Autoliv stock-based awards which include stock options (SOs), restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance shares (PSs)(PSUs). In connection with the Veoneer spin-off, each outstanding Autoliv stock-based award as of June 29, 2018 (the Distribution Date) was converted to a stock award that has underlying shares of both Autoliv and Veoneer common shares.

The conversion that occurred on the Distribution Date was based on the following:

SOs - A number of SOs comprising 50% of the value of the outstanding SOs calculated immediately prior to the spin-off continued to be applicable to Autoliv common stock. A number of SOs comprising the remaining 50% percent of the pre spin-off value were replaced with options to acquire shares of Veoneer common stock.

RSUs - A number of RSUs comprising 50% of the value of the outstanding RSUs calculated immediately prior to the spin-off continued to be applicable to Autoliv common stock. A number of RSUs comprising the remaining 50% of the pre spin-off value were replaced with RSUs with underlying Veoneer common stock.

PSs - Outstanding PSs pre spin-off were converted to time-based RSUs and were divided between Autoliv and Veoneer common stock in the same manner as other outstanding RSUs (as described above) on the Distribution Date. The number of outstanding PSs pre spin-off to be converted was determined based on pro-ration of the performance period such as:

1)

The level of actual achievement of performance goals for each outstanding PS for the period between the first day of the performance period and December 31, 2017 (the “Performance Measurement Date”), referred to as “Level of Performance-to-Date”; and

2)

The greater of the Level of Performance-to-Date and the target performance level for the period between the Performance Measurement Date and the last day of the performance period.

In each case above, the conversion was intended to generally preserve the intrinsic value of the original award determined as of the Distribution Date. The number of converted RSUs and SOs for Autoliv and Veoneer was based on the average of Autoliv closing stock prices for the last 5 trading days prior to the spin-off and the average of closing stock prices of Autoliv and Veoneer, respectively, for the first 5 trading days after the spin-off. Accordingly, 50% of the outstanding awards as of the Distribution Date, and the related exercise price, were converted to Adjusted Autoliv Awards using a conversion factor of 1.41.

As a result of the spin-off and the related conversion, it was determined that the stock based awards were modified in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation. The fair value of the RSUs and SOs immediately before and after the modification was assessed in order to determine if the modification resulted in any incremental compensation cost related to the awards, including consideration of the impact of conversion using the 5 trading day average. Based on the valuation performed, it was determined that the conversion did not result in any incremental compensation cost for any of the outstanding awards. The post spin-off stock-based compensation expense will be based on the original grant date fair value related to only Autoliv employees.

With certain limited exceptions, including the freezing of the Performance Measurement Date to December 31, 2017 as noted above, the adjusted SOs and RSUs outstanding after the spin-off are subject to the same terms and conditions (including with respect to vesting and expiration) that were applicable to such Autoliv stock-based awards immediately prior to the conversion and as described below.

The fair value of the RSUs and PSsPSUs is calculated as the grant date fair value of the shares expected to be issued. The RSUs and PSUs granted in 20182021, 2020 and 20172019 entitle the grantee to receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional RSUs subject to the same vesting conditions as the underlying RSUs. The RSUs granted prior to 2017 do not have dividend equivalent rights.and PSUs. For the grants made during 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, the fair value of a PSRSU and a RSUPSU was calculated by using the closing stock price on the grant date. For the grants made during 2016 and earlier, the fair value of a RSU and a PS was estimated using the Black Scholes valuation model to account for the difference in the value of the awards resulting from such awards not having dividend equivalent rights. The grant date fair value during 2021 was approximately $6 million for the RSUs on February 13, 2018 was $16.6and approximately $6 million (pre-spin grant date fair value). The amount of this cost attributable to Autoliv employees afterfor the spin-off will be amortized straight line overPSUs.

Under the vesting period.


Pursuant to the Company’s director compensation policy approved in 2020, the Company’s non-employee directors receive RSUs as payment of 50%equivalent to approximately 54% of their annual base retainer whichexcept for the Chairman of the Board of Directors who also receives 50% of his Non-Executive Chairman supplemental retainer in RSUs. All RSUs vest in one installment on the earlier of the date of the next AGM or the first anniversary of the grant date, in each case subject to the grantee’s continued service as a non-employee director on the vesting date with certainlimited exceptions. The RSUs granted to the Company’s non-employee directors entitle the grantee to receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional RSUs subject to the same vesting conditions as the underlying RSUs. The grant date fair value for the RSUs granted in 20182021 to the Company’s non-employee directors was $1.4approximately $1 million.

The source of the shares issued upon vesting of awards is generally from treasury shares. The Stock Incentive Plan provides for the issuance of up to 9,585,055 common shares for awards. At December 31, 2018, 6,394,3922021, 6,812,805 of these shares have been issued for awards which includes 37,10393,455 shares of common stock issued to non-executivenon-employee directors in satisfaction of all or a portion of his or her annual base retainer for service on the Board. Included within the RSUs granted in 20182021 are 7,86915,530 RSUs issued to non employeenon-employee directors in satisfaction of all or a portion of his or her annual base retainer for service on the Board.

DuringIn 2015 and earlier, stock awards were granted in the form of SOs and RSUs. All SOs were granted for 10-year10-year terms, had an exercise price equal to the fair value of the share at the date of grant, and became exercisable after one year of continued employment following the grant date. The average grant date fair values of SOs were calculated using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The Company used historical exercise data for determining the expected life assumption. Expected volatility was based on historical and implied volatility.

The Company recorded $9.1approximately $10 million, $6.1$12 million and $8.4$8 million stock-based compensation expense in continuing operations related to RSUs and PSsPSUs for 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. The total compensation cost related to non-vested awards not yet recognized is $10.3$13 million for RSUs and PSs and the weighted average period over which this cost is expected to be recognized is approximately 1.7 years. There are no0 remaining unrecognized compensation costs associated with stock options.SOs.

Information on the number of RSUs, PSsPSUs and SOs related to the Stock Incentive Plan during the period of 20162019 to 20182021 is as follows.

RSUs

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Weighted average fair value at grant date

 

$

94.01

 

 

$

69.58

 

 

$

76.85

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at beginning of year

 

 

244,901

 

 

 

255,195

 

 

 

262,074

 

Granted

 

 

81,866

 

 

 

115,500

 

 

 

109,653

 

Shares issued

 

 

(99,399

)

 

 

(105,750

)

 

 

(86,086

)

Cancelled/Forfeited/Expired

 

 

(9,100

)

 

 

(20,044

)

 

 

(30,446

)

Outstanding at end of year

 

 

218,268

 

 

 

244,901

 

 

 

255,195

 

RSUs

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Weighted average fair value at grant date 1)

 

$

131.51

 

 

$

105.64

 

 

$

100.77

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at beginning of year

 

 

188,410

 

 

 

188,494

 

 

 

204,552

 

Granted

 

 

131,246

 

 

 

84,771

 

 

 

71,870

 

Shares issued

 

 

(84,425

)

 

 

(70,795

)

 

 

(66,651

)

Cancelled/Forfeited/Expired

 

 

(6,485

)

 

 

(14,060

)

 

 

(21,277

)

Spin conversion 2)

 

 

33,328

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at end of year3)

 

 

262,074

 

 

 

188,410

 

 

 

188,494

 

1)

Weighted average fair value at grant date pre-spin.

2)

Reflects the impact of the cancellation of PS awards outstanding as of the Distribution Date, and the conversion to RSUs in accordance with the conversion factor described above.

3)

Outstanding at the end of 2018 reflects the RSUs held by employees of Autoliv and Veoneer, in accordance with the conversion factor described above. Outstanding at the end of 2017 and 2016, respectively reflects RSUs held by employees of Autoliv. The corresponding weighted average grant date fair value after applying the conversion factor is $100.74 as of December 31, 2018.

The aggregate intrinsic value for RSUs outstanding at December 31, 20182021 was $18.4approximately $16 million.

PSUs

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Weighted average fair value at grant date

 

$

93.90

 

 

$

69.86

 

 

$

77.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at beginning of year

 

 

158,128

 

 

 

76,321

 

 

 

0

 

Change in performance conditions

 

 

(44,385

)

 

 

23,998

 

 

 

12,530

 

Granted

 

 

74,427

 

 

 

75,940

 

 

 

66,542

 

Cancelled/Forfeited/Expired

 

 

(8,859

)

 

 

(18,131

)

 

 

(2,751

)

Outstanding at end of year

 

 

179,311

 

 

 

158,128

 

 

 

76,321

 

PSs

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Weighted average fair value at grant date 1)

 

$

105.87

 

 

$

105.87

 

 

$

98.57

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at beginning of year

 

 

139,891

 

 

 

138,548

 

 

 

 

Change in performance conditions

 

 

 

 

 

(69,274

)

 

 

 

Granted 2)

 

 

588

 

 

 

75,379

 

 

 

143,740

 

Shares issued

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cancelled/Forfeited/Expired

 

 

(3,076

)

 

 

(4,762

)

 

 

(5,192

)

Spin conversion 3)

 

 

(137,403

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at end of year 4)

 

 

 

 

 

139,891

 

 

 

138,548

 

1)

Weighted average fair value at grant date pre-spin.

2)

2018 grants reflect awards issued pre-spin as a result of dividend equivalent rights.

3)

Reflects the replacement of awards due to the spin-off. Outstanding PS awards were converted to RSU awards in accordance with the conversion factor described above.

4)

Outstanding at the end of 2017 and 2016, respectively reflects PSs held by employees of Autoliv.


The PSsPSUs granted include assumptions regarding the ultimate number of shares that will be issued based on the probability of achievement of the performance conditions. Changes in those assumptions result in changes in the estimated shares to be issued which is reflected in the “Change in performance conditions” line above.

SOs

 

Number

of options

 

 

Weighted

average

exercise

price

 

Outstanding at Dec 31, 2015

 

 

473,051

 

 

$

87.88

 

Exercised

 

 

(51,084

)

 

 

88.10

 

Cancelled/Forfeited/Expired

 

 

(10,858

)

 

 

102.31

 

Outstanding at Dec 31, 2016

 

 

411,109

 

 

$

87.47

 

Exercised

 

 

(100,184

)

 

 

79.58

 

Cancelled/Forfeited/Expired

 

 

(10,976

)

 

 

112.20

 

Outstanding at Dec 31, 2017

 

 

299,949

 

 

$

89.20

 

Exercised

 

 

(92,485

)

 

 

86.59

 

Cancelled/Forfeited/Expired

 

 

 

 

 

 

Spin conversion 1)

 

 

(65,390

)

 

 

88.75

 

Outstanding at Dec 31, 2018 2)

 

 

142,074

 

 

$

63.43

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPTIONS EXERCISABLE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2016

 

 

254,842

 

 

$

71.48

 

At December 31, 2017

 

 

299,949

 

 

$

89.20

 

At December 31, 2018

 

 

142,074

 

 

$

63.43

 

78

1)


SOs

 

Number
of options

 

 

Weighted
average
exercise
price

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2018

 

 

142,074

 

 

$

63.43

 

Exercised

 

 

(20,928

)

 

 

42.11

 

Spin conversion 1)

 

 

(5,271

)

 

 

80.40

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2019

 

 

115,875

 

 

 

66.70

 

Exercised

 

 

(14,238

)

 

 

55.55

 

Cancelled/Forfeited/Expired

 

 

(11,462

)

 

 

69.25

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2020

 

 

90,175

 

 

 

68.13

 

Exercised

 

 

(40,112

)

 

 

67.49

 

Cancelled/Forfeited/Expired

 

 

(188

)

 

 

51.74

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2021

 

 

49,875

 

 

 

68.71

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPTIONS EXERCISABLE

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2019

 

 

115,875

 

 

$

66.70

 

At December 31, 2020

 

 

90,175

 

 

 

68.13

 

At December 31, 2021

 

 

49,875

 

 

 

68.71

 

1) Reflects the cancellation of SOs outstanding as of the Distribution Date, and the conversion to new awards in accordance with the conversion factor 1.41. The weighted average exercise price reflects the exercise price of the shares cancelled due to the Veoneer spin-off.

Reflects the cancellation of SOs outstanding as of the Distribution Date, and the conversion to new awards in accordance with the conversion factor described above. The weighted average exercise price reflects the exercise price of the shares cancelled due to the spin-off.

2)

Reflects outstanding SOs held by employees of Autoliv and Veoneer at the end of the year and the weighted average exercise price, in accordance with the conversion factor described above.

The following summarizes information about SOs outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2018:2021:

RANGE OF EXERCISE PRICES

 

Number

outstanding &

exercisable

 

 

Remaining

contract life

(in years)

 

 

Weighted

average

exercise

price

 

$11.57

 

 

5,885

 

 

 

0.14

 

 

$

11.57

 

$31.71

 

 

7,047

 

 

 

1.13

 

 

 

31.71

 

$47.52– $49.07

 

 

27,553

 

 

 

3.64

 

 

 

48.30

 

$51.74

 

 

10,120

 

 

 

2.15

 

 

 

51.74

 

$67.29

 

 

37,768

 

 

 

5.14

 

 

 

67.29

 

$80.40

 

 

53,701

 

 

 

6.13

 

 

 

80.40

 

 

 

 

142,074

 

 

 

4.64

 

 

$

63.43

 

RANGE OF EXERCISE PRICES

 

Number
outstanding &
exercisable

 

 

Remaining
contract life
(in years)

 

 

Weighted
average
exercise
price

 

$47.52

 

 

4,435

 

 

 

0.14

 

 

$

47.52

 

$49.07

 

 

8,113

 

 

 

1.14

 

 

 

49.07

 

$67.29

 

 

13,961

 

 

 

2.14

 

 

 

67.29

 

$80.40

 

 

23,366

 

 

 

3.13

 

 

 

80.40

 

 

 

 

49,875

 

 

 

2.26

 

 

 

68.71

 

The total aggregate intrinsic value, which is the difference between the exercise price and $70.23$103.41 (closing price per share at December 31, 2018)2021), for all “in the money” SOs, both outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2018,2021, was $10.0approximately $2 million.

18.

79


17. Contingent Liabilities

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Various claims, lawsuits and proceedings are pending or threatened against the Company or its subsidiaries, covering a range of matters that arise in the ordinary course of its business activities with respect to commercial, product liability and other matters. Litigation is subject to many uncertainties, and the outcome of any litigation cannot be assured. After discussions with counsel, and with the exception of losses resulting from the antitrust proceedings described below, it is the opinion of management that the various legal proceedings and investigations to which the Company currently is a party will not have a material adverse impact on the consolidated financial position of Autoliv, but the Company cannot provide assurance that Autoliv will not experience material litigation, product liability or other losses in the future.

In October 2014, one of the Company’s Brazilian subsidiaries received a notice of deficiency from the state tax authorities from the state of São Paulo, Brazil which, primarily, alleged violations of ICMS (VAT) payments and improper warehousing documentation. The aggregate assessment for all alleged violations was R$81 million (approximately $21 million), inclusive of fines, penalties and interest. The Company believed that a loss was probable with respect to at least a portion of the assessed amount and accrued an amount in 2015 that was not material to the Company’s results of operations. During the first quarter of 2018, the Brazilian authorities offered an amnesty period which would allow taxpayers to reduce the penalties associated with eligible tax matters by up to 85%. During the second quarter of 2018, the Company applied to participate in such tax amnesty program which was accepted by the Brazilian authorities. The Company paid an immaterial amount during the period ended June 30, 2018 to resolve this matter.


ANTITRUST MATTERS

Authorities in several jurisdictions are currently or have been conductingconducted broad, and in some cases, long-running investigations of suspected anti-competitive behavior among parts suppliers in the global automotive vehicle industry. These investigations include,included, but are not limited to, the products that the Company sells. In addition to concluded and pending matters, authorities of other countries with significant light vehicle manufacturing or sales may initiate similar investigations. It is the Company’s policy to cooperate with governmental investigations.

European Commission (“EC”) Investigations:

On June 7-9, 2011, representatives of the European Commission (“EC”), the European antitrust authority, visited two facilities of a Company subsidiary in Germany to gather information for an investigation of anti-competitive behavior among suppliers of occupant safety systems.

On November 22, 2017, the EC concluded a discrete portion of its investigation and imposed a fine on the Company of EUR 8.1 million (approximately $9.7 million) with respect to this portion of the EC’s overall investigation while it continues the more significant portion of its investigation. The Company paid this amount during the first quarter of 2018, and had previously accrued EUR 8.3 million (approximately $9.9 million) in 2017 with respect to this discrete portion of the investigation.

Management does not believe the outcome of this discrete portion of the EC’s investigation as noted above provides an indication of the total probable loss associated with the EC investigation as a whole. The Company believes that the EC will seek to impose a fine in connection with the remaining portion of the EC investigation. According to management’s best estimation and based on advice of our legal counsel, the Company accrued EUR 184 million (approximately $210 million) during the fourth quarter of 2018, which was recorded in Accrued expenses and Other income (expense), net. The Company believes that a fine could be issued during the first half of 2019, although this may be delayed. The fine would be payable within 90 days after the investigation is ultimately resolved and would be denominated in euros.

South Africa Investigation:

In August 2014, the Competition Commission of South Africa (the “CCSA”) contacted the Company regarding an investigation into the Company’s sales of occupant safety systems in South Africa. In September 2017, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the CCSA in which the Company agreed to pay an administrative penalty of R150 million (approximately $11 million), which the Competition Tribunal in South Africa confirmed on November 22, 2017. The Company had previously accrued a total of approximately $6 million in 2016 for this matter, and accrued an additional $5 million in 2017 with respect to the proposed settlement, and final payment of the settlement amount was made in February 2018.

Brazil Investigation:

On July 6, 2015, the Company learned that the General Superintendence of the Administrative Council for Economic Defense (“CADE”) in Brazil had initiated an investigation of an alleged cartel involving sales in Brazil of seatbelts, airbags, and steering wheels by the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary and the Brazilian subsidiary of a competitor. In November 2016, the Company and the CADE entered into a settlement agreement with respect to this matter for an amount that is not material to the Company’s results of operations. Settlement amounts were accrued for this matter during the periods ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2016, and final payment of the accrued amounts was made in 2017.

Civil Litigation:

The Company is subject to civil litigation alleging anti-competitive conduct in the U.S. and Canada. Specifically, the Company, several of its subsidiaries and its competitors were named as defendants in a total of nineteen purported antitrust class action lawsuits filed between June 2012 and June 2015. Fifteen of these lawsuits were filed in the U.S. and were consolidated in the Occupant Safety Systems (OSS) segment of the Automobile Parts Antitrust Litigation, a Multi-District Litigation (MDL) proceeding in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Plaintiffs in the U.S. cases sought to represent four purported classes - direct purchasers, auto dealers, end-payors, and, as of the filing of the last class action in June 2015, truck and equipment dealers - who purchased occupant safety systems or components directly from a defendant, indirectly through purchases or leases of new vehicles containing such systems, or through purchases of replacement parts.

In May 2014, the Company, without admitting any liability, entered into separate settlement agreements with the direct purchasers, auto dealers, end-payors plaintiff classes, which were granted final approval by the MDL court in 2015 and 2016. The total settlement amount of $65 million (later reduced to approximately $60.5 million as a result of opt-outs from the direct purchaser settlement) was expensed in 2014. In April 2016, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the truck and equipment dealers’ class, which was granted final approval by the MDL court in 2016, for an amount that is immaterial to the Company’s results of operations. The class settlements do not resolve any claims of settlement class members who opt-out of the settlements or the unasserted claims of any purchasers of occupant safety systems who are not otherwise included in a settlement class, such as states and municipalities. Two direct purchasers opted out of the Company’s direct purchaser class settlement and several individuals and one insurer (and its affiliated entities) opted-out of the end-payor class settlements, including the Company’s settlement.


In September 2016, the insurer (and its affiliated entities) that opted out of the end-payor class settlement filed an antitrust lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, the venue for the MDL, against the Company and the other settling defendants in the end-payor class settlements. The defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint on various grounds was granted in part and denied in part in August 2018. Since this decision, various amended pleadings and motions have been made by insurer. To date, no decision has been rendered by the Court. The Company cannot predict or estimate the duration or ultimate outcome of this matter.

In March 2015, the Company, without admitting any liability, reached agreements regarding additional settlements to resolve certain direct purchasers’ global (including U.S.) or non-U.S. antitrust claims that were not covered by the direct purchaser class settlement described above. The total amount of these additional settlements was $81 million. Autoliv expensed during the first quarter of 2015 approximately $77 million as a result of these additional settlements, net of existing amounts that had been accrued in 2014.

The remaining four antitrust class action lawsuits were filed in Canada (Sheridan Chevrolet Cadillac Ltd. et al. v. Autoliv, Inc. et al., filed in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on January 18, 2013; M. Serge Asselin v. Autoliv, Inc. et al., filed in the Superior Court of Quebec on March 14, 2013; Ewert v. Autoliv, Inc. et al., filed in the Supreme Court of British Columbia on July 18, 2013; and Cindy Retallick and Jagjeet Singh Rajput v. Autoliv ASP, Inc. et al., filed in the Queen’s Bench of the Judicial Center of Regina in the province of Saskatchewan on May 14, 2014) asserting claims on behalf of putative classes of both direct and indirect purchasers of occupant safety systems. In February 2017, the Company entered into, and the courts subsequently approved, a settlement agreement with plaintiffs in three of the four class actions to settle on a nationwide class basis for an amount that is not material to the Company’s results of operations. Settlement amounts were accrued for this matter during the period ended December 31, 2016 and final payment of the accrued amounts was made in 2017. This national settlement includes the claims of the putative members of the fourth class action.

PRODUCT WARRANTY, RECALLS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Autoliv is exposed to various claims for damages and compensation if its products fail to perform as expected. Such claims can be made, and result in costs and other losses to the Company, even where the product is eventually found to have functioned properly. Where a product (actually or allegedly) fails to perform as expected or is defective, the Company may face warranty and recall claims. Where such (actual or alleged) failure or defect results, or is alleged to result, in bodily injury and/or property damage, the Company may also face product liability and other claims. There can be no assurance that the Company will not experience material warranty, recall or product (or other) liability claims or losses in the future, or that the Company will not incur significant costs to defend against such claims. The Company may be required to participate in a recall involving its products. Each vehicle manufacturer has its own practices regarding product recalls and other product liability actions relating to its suppliers. As suppliers become more integrally involved in the vehicle design process and assume more of the vehicle assembly functions, vehicle manufacturers are increasingly looking to their suppliers for contribution when faced with recalls and product liability claims. Government safety regulators may also play a role in warranty and recall practices. Recall decisions regarding the Company’s products may require a significant amount of judgment by us, our customers and safety regulators and are influenced by a variety of factors. Once a recall has been made, the cost of a recall is also subject to a significant amount of judgment and discussions between the Company and its customers. A warranty, recall or product-liability claim brought against the Company in excess of its insurance may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. Vehicle manufacturers are also increasingly requiring their outside suppliers to guarantee or warrant their products and bear the costs of repair and replacement of such products under new vehicle warranties. A vehicle manufacturer may attempt to hold the Company responsible for some, or all, of the repair or replacement costs of products when the product supplied did not perform as represented by us or expected by the customer.customer in either a warranty or a recall situation. Accordingly, the future costs of warranty or recall claims by the customers may be material. However, the Company believes its established reserves are adequate. Autoliv’s warranty reserves are based upon the Company’s best estimates of amounts necessary to settle future and existing claims. The Company regularly evaluates the adequacy of these reserves, and adjusts them when appropriate. However, the final amounts actually due related to these matters could differ materially from the Company’s recorded estimates.

In addition, as vehicle manufacturers increasingly use global platforms and procedures, quality performance evaluations are also conducted on a global basis. Any one or more quality, warranty or other recall issue(s) (including those affecting few units and/or having a small financial impact) may cause a vehicle manufacturer to implement measures such as a temporary or prolonged suspension of new orders, which may have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations.

The Company carriesmaintains a program of insurance, which may include commercial insurance, self-insurance, or a combination of both approaches, for potential recall and product liability claims at coverage levelsin amounts and on terms that it believes are reasonable and prudent based on our prior claims experience. The Company’s insurance policies generally include coverage of the costs of a recall, although costs related to replacement parts are generally not covered. In addition, a number of the agreements entered into by the Company, including the Spin-off Agreements, require Autoliv to indemnify the other parties for certain claims. Autoliv cannot assure that the level of coverage will be sufficient to cover every possible claim that can arise in our businesses or with respect to other obligations, now or in the future, or that such coverage always will be available should we, now or in the future, wish to extend, increase or otherwise adjust our insurance.


As noted in Note 12 above, as of December 31, 2021, the Company has accrued $144 million for total product related liabilities. The majority of the total product liability accrual as of December 31, 2021, relates to recalls, which are generally covered by insurance. Insurance receivables for such recall related liabilities total $138 million as of December 31, 2021.

Toyota Recall:

80


Product Liability:

On September 18, 2014, Jamie Andrews filed a wrongful death products liability suit against several Autoliv entities stemming from a fatal car accident in 2013 where the plaintiff’s husband was fatally injured. The lawsuit alleges that Autoliv should be liable for a defectively-designed driver seatbelt. The case was removed to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The suit originally included Bosch and Mazda entities as well, but these entities were dismissed pursuant to confidential settlement agreements with the plaintiff, and all of the Autoliv entities except Autoliv Japan Ltd. were also dismissed. On January 10, 2017, the District Court entered an order granting summary judgment in favor of Autoliv, concluding that Autoliv was not actively involved in the design of Mr. Andrews’s seatbelt and, therefore, should not be liable for plaintiff’s claims as a matter of law. However, on appeal, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision, holding that, under Georgia’s products liability statute, Autoliv could be liable for a design defect associated with the seatbelt, regardless of its level of involvement in the seatbelt’s ultimate design, because Autoliv manufactured it. On October 4, 2021, the case proceeded to a bench trial before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. On December 31, 2021, the District Court entered a Final Order and Judgment concluding that Mr. Andrews’s seatbelt was defectively designed and Autoliv was strictly liable for the design. In doing so, the District Court concluded that Mr. Andrews had incurred $27,019,343 in compensatory damages, but only ordered Autoliv to pay 50 percent of that amount, $13,509,671 after finding that 50 percent of the fault for Mr. Andrews’s damages should be apportioned to Mazda. The Court declined to apportion any fault for Mr. Andrews’s damages to Mr. Andrews or Bosch. The District Court also entered an award of punitive damages against Autoliv in the amount of $100,000,000. The plaintiff has since filed a post-trial motion asking the District Court to hold Autoliv liable for the entire amount of compensatory damages ($27,019,343), not just $13,509,671. The plaintiff has also requested pre-judgment interest on the damages awards plus attorneys’ fees and costs. Autoliv plans to oppose these requests.

The Company believes the District Court’s verdict was in error, including the grossly high punitive damages award, and has filed a post-trial motion with the District Court asking for reconsideration of the verdict. To the extent its post-trial motion is denied, the Company also plans to appeal the verdict.

The Company has determined that a loss with respect to this litigation is probable and has in the fourth quarter of 2021 accrued $14 million pursuant to ASC 450. The accrual is reflected in the total product liability accrual at December 31, 2021. This amount reflects the low end of the range of a probable loss of $14 million to $114 million. The accrual reflects the Company’s best estimate of the probable loss based on currently available information and does not include any amount for the punitive damages. It is reasonably possible that the Company may have to pay the entire damages awarded by the District Court. The Company believes that its insurance should cover all of the types of damages awarded by the District Court, and has therefore recognized a receivable, included within Other non-current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2021, for the expected insurance proceeds. However, the extent of the Company's insurance coverage for punitive damages in this matter is uncertain and may be less than all of such punitive damages ultimately awarded. In the event all or a portion of the punitive damages award survives the Company's post-judgement actions, the Company will continue to engage with our insurance carriers and aggressively pursue all potential recoveries. The ultimate loss to the Company of the litigation matter could be materially different from the amount the Company has accrued. The Company cannot predict or estimate the duration or ultimate outcome of this matter.

81


Specific Recalls:

On June 29, 2016, the Company announced that it iswas cooperating with Toyota Motor Corp. in its recall of approximately 1.4 million vehicles equipped with a certain model of the Company’s side curtain airbag (the “Toyota Recall”). Toyota has informed the Company that there have been eight reported incidents where a side curtain airbag has partially inflated without a deployment signal from the airbag control unit. The incidents have all occurred in parked, unoccupied vehicles and no personal injuries have been reported. The root cause analysis of the issue is ongoing. However, at this point in time the Company believes that a compromised manufacturing process at a sub-supplier may be a contributing factor and, as no incidents have been reported in vehicles produced by other OEMs with the same inflator produced during the same period as those recalled by Toyota, that vehicle-specific characteristics may also contribute to the issue. The sub-supplier’s manufacturing process was changed in January 2012, and the vehicles now recalled by Toyota represent more than half of all inflators of the relevant type manufactured before the sub-supplier process was changed.

As previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company determined pursuant to ASC 450 that a loss with respect to this issue is reasonably possible. If the Company is obligated to indemnify Toyota for the costs associated with the Toyota Recall was probable and accrued an amount that was included in the total product liability accrual in the fourth quarter of 2020. The Company settled and resolved the Toyota Recall on April 27, 2021. The final amount by which the product liability accrual exceeded the product liability insurance receivable was $26 million. The matter is now closed.

In the fourth quarter of 2020, the Company expectswas made aware of a potential recall by one of its customers (the “Unannounced Recall”). The Company continues to evaluate this matter with its customer. The Company determined pursuant to ASC 450 that itsa loss with respect to the Unannounced Recall is probable and accrued an amount that is reflected in the total product liability accrual in the fourth quarter of 2020 and increased the accrual in the fourth quarter of 2021. The amount by which the product liability accrual exceeds the product liability insurance will generally cover suchreceivable with respect to the Unannounced Recall is $27 million and includes self-insurance retention costs and liabilities and estimates thatdeductibles. The ultimate loss to the Company’s loss, net of expected insurance recoveries, would be less than $20 million. However, the ultimate costsCompany of the ToyotaUnannounced Recall could be materially different. The main variables affectingdifferent from the ultimate cost foramount the Company are:has accrued.

Volvo Car USA, LLC (together with its affiliates, “Volvo”) has recalled approximately 762,000 vehicles relating to the determinationmalfunction of proportionate responsibility (if any) among Toyota,inflators produced by ZF (the “ZF Inflator Recall”). The recalled ZF inflators were included in airbag modules supplied by the Company only to Volvo. The recall commenced in November 2020 and later expanded in September 2021. Because the Company’s airbags were involved with the ZF Inflator Recall, the Company has determined pursuant to ASC 450 that a loss is reasonably possible with respect to the ZF Inflator Recall. The Company continues to evaluate this matter with Volvo and ZF and no accrual has been made. Although the Company currently estimates a range of $0 to $43 million with respect to this potential loss, the Company anticipates that any relevant sub-suppliers; the ultimate numberlosses net of vehicles repaired; the cost of repair per vehicle;insurance claims and the actual recoveries from sub-suppliers and insurers. The Company’s insurance policies generally include coverage of the costs of a recall, although costs related to replacement parts are generally not covered.claims against ZF will be immaterial.

Intellectual property:

In its products, the Company utilizes technologies which may be subject to intellectual property rights of third parties. While the Company does seek to procure the necessary rights to utilize intellectual property rights associated with its products, it may fail to do so. Where the Company so fails, the Company may be exposed to material claims from the owners of such rights. Where the Company has sold products which infringe upon such rights, its customers may be entitled to be indemnified by the Company for the claims they suffer as a result thereof. Such claims could be material.

The table in Note 1312 Product Related Liabilities above summarizes the change in the balance sheet position of the product related liabilities for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.2021.

19. Lease Commitments82


OPERATING LEASES

The Company leases certain offices, manufacturing and research buildings, machinery, automobiles, data processing and other equipment under operating lease contracts. The operating leases, some of which are non-cancellable and include renewals, expire at various dates through 2045. The Company pays most maintenance, insurance and tax expenses relating to leased assets. Rental expense for operating leases was $47 million, $46 million and $41 million for 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

At December 31, 2018, future minimum lease payments for non-cancellable operating leases totaled $186 million and are payable as follows (in millions): 2019: $42; 2020: $36; 2021: $29; 2022: $26; 2023: $20; 2024 and thereafter: $33.

CAPITAL LEASES

At December 31, 2018, future minimum lease payments for non-cancellable capital leases were not material.

20.18. Retirement Plans

DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLANS

Many of the Company’s employees are covered by government sponsored pension and welfare programs. Under the terms of these programs, the Company makes periodic payments to various government agencies. In addition, in some countries the Company sponsors or participates in certain non-governmental defined contribution plans. Contributions to defined contribution plans for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 were $19.2$18 million, $21.7$15 million and $21.3$16 million, respectively.

MULTIEMPLOYER PLANS

The Company participates in a multiemployer plan in Sweden, which is deemed insignificant. The SwedishSweden. This ITP-2 pension plan is funded through Alecta. ForAlecta and covers employees born before 1979, the planfor whom it provides a final pay pension benefit based on all service with participating employers. The Company must pay for wage increases in excess of inflation on service earned with previous employers. The plan also provides disability and family benefits. The planbenefits and is more than 100%100% funded. The CompanyCompany´s contributions to thethis multiemployer plan in Sweden for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 were $6.1$5 million, $9.7$4 million and $4.4$4 million, respectively.


DEFINED BENEFIT PLANS

The Company has a number of defined benefit pension plans, both contributory and non-contributory, in the U.S., France, Germany, France,India, Japan, Mexico, Philippines, Poland, Sweden, South Korea, India,Thailand, Turkey Thailand, Philippines and the United Kingdom. There are funded as well as unfunded plan arrangements which provide retirement benefits to both U.S. and non-U.S. participants.

The main plan is the U.S. plan for which the benefits are based on an average of the employee’s earnings in the years preceding retirement and on credited service. In a prior year, the Company closed participation in the Autoliv ASP, Inc. Pension Plan to exclude those employees hired after December 31, 2003. Within the U.S. there is also a non-qualified restoration plan that provides benefits to employees whose benefits in the primary U.S. plan are restricted by limitations on the compensation that can be considered in calculating their benefits. During December 2017 the Company decided to amendamended the U.S. defined benefit pension plan, communicating a benefits freeze that will begin on December 31, 2021. There were no curtailment expenses due to U.S. plan freeze. The curtailment caused a decrease inSettlement accounting has been triggered because the projected benefit obligation (PBO)lump-sum payments made during the year exceeded the sum of $62 million as of December 31, 2017, with the offset recorded to OCI.service cost and interest cost.

For the Company’s non-U.S. defined benefit plans the most significant individual plan residesis in the U.K. The Company has closed participation in the U.K. defined benefit plan to exclude all employees hired after April 30, 2003 with few members currently accruing benefits.

CHANGES IN BENEFIT OBLIGATIONS AND PLAN ASSETS RELATED TO CONTINUING OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIODSYEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31

 

U.S.

 

 

Non-U.S.

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

U.S.

 

 

Non-U.S.

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

 

$

368.6

 

 

$

361.2

 

 

$

220.9

 

 

$

190.6

 

 

$

426

 

$

400

 

 

$

279

 

$

253

 

Service cost

 

 

8.7

 

 

 

9.0

 

 

 

10.8

 

 

 

10.4

 

 

8

 

8

 

 

 

12

 

12

 

Interest cost

 

 

12.8

 

 

 

14.8

 

 

 

5.7

 

 

 

5.5

 

 

10

 

12

 

 

 

5

 

6

 

Actuarial (gain) loss due to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in discount rate

 

 

(44.6

)

 

 

53.4

 

 

 

(12.1

)

 

 

5.9

 

 

(17

)

 

46

 

 

 

(22

)

 

13

 

Experience

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

(2.0

)

 

 

4.7

 

 

 

(4.3

)

 

3

 

(5

)

 

 

9

 

0

 

Other assumption changes

 

 

3.5

 

 

 

4.2

 

 

 

4.8

 

 

 

1.4

 

 

3

 

3

 

 

 

4

 

(11

)

Plan amendments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(0.5

)

Benefits paid

 

 

(17.7

)

 

 

(9.8

)

 

 

(7.9

)

 

 

(7.9

)

 

(4

)

 

(4

)

 

 

(8

)

 

(9

)

Plan settlements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

(0.1

)

 

(48

)

 

(34

)

 

 

(2

)

 

(0

)

Curtailments

 

 

 

 

 

(62.2

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Special termination benefits

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

0.3

 

Other

 

0

 

0

 

 

 

(0

)

 

2

 

Translation difference

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9.6

)

 

 

19.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(16

)

 

 

15

 

Benefit obligation at end of year

 

$

332.1

 

 

$

368.6

 

 

$

216.9

 

 

$

220.9

 

 

$

381

 

$

426

 

 

$

260

 

$

279

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

 

$

297.9

 

 

$

256.5

 

 

$

84.8

 

 

$

76.5

 

 

$

355

 

$

324

 

 

$

103

 

$

89

 

Actual return on plan assets

 

 

(13.9

)

 

 

44.5

 

 

 

(1.9

)

 

 

2.3

 

 

25

 

53

 

 

 

1

 

9

 

Company contributions

 

 

6.7

 

 

 

6.7

 

 

 

9.0

 

 

 

6.3

 

 

15

 

17

 

 

 

11

 

10

 

Benefits paid

 

 

(17.7

)

 

 

(9.8

)

 

 

(7.9

)

 

 

(7.9

)

 

(4

)

 

(4

)

 

 

(8

)

 

(9

)

Plan settlements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

(0.1

)

 

(48

)

 

(34

)

 

 

(2

)

 

(0

)

Translation difference

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5.4

)

 

 

7.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

5

 

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

 

$

273.0

 

 

$

297.9

 

 

$

77.8

 

 

$

84.8

 

 

$

343

 

 

$

355

 

 

$

101

 

 

$

103

 

Funded status recognized in the balance sheet

 

$

(59.1

)

 

$

(70.7

)

 

$

(139.1

)

 

$

(136.1

)

Pension liability recognized in the balance sheet

 

$

38

 

$

72

 

 

$

159

 

$

176

 

The U.S. plan provides that benefits may be paid in the form of a lump sum if so elected by the participant. In order to more accurately reflect a market-derived pension obligation, Autoliv adjusts the assumed lump sum interest rate to reflect market conditions as of each December 31. This methodology is consistent with the approach required under the Pension Protection Act of 2006, which provides the rules for determining minimum funding requirements in the U.S.

83


COMPONENTS OF NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEFINED BENEFIT RETIREMENT PLANS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31

 

U.S.

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

U.S.

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Service cost

 

$

8.7

 

 

$

9.0

 

 

$

8.3

 

 

$

8

 

$

8

 

$

7

 

Interest cost

 

 

12.8

 

 

 

14.8

 

 

 

14.6

 

 

10

 

12

 

14

 

Expected return on plan assets

 

 

(20.4

)

 

 

(17.6

)

 

 

(16.6

)

 

(18

)

 

(16

)

 

(14

)

Amortization of prior service credit

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(0.9

)

Amortization of actuarial loss

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

6.0

 

 

 

4.8

 

 

2

 

3

 

2

 

Curtailment loss

 

 

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

 

Settlement loss

 

 

5

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

0

 

Net periodic benefit cost

 

$

3.4

 

 

$

12.4

 

 

$

10.2

 

 

$

7

 

$

13

 

$

10

 

 

 

Non-U.S.

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Service cost

 

$

12

 

 

$

12

 

 

$

11

 

Interest cost

 

 

5

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

6

 

Expected return on plan assets

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(2

)

Amortization of prior service costs

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Amortization of actuarial loss

 

 

1

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

1

 

Settlement loss

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1

 

Special termination benefits

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1

 

Net periodic benefit cost

 

$

17

 

 

$

19

 

 

$

18

 

 

 

Non-U.S.

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Service cost

 

$

10.8

 

 

$

10.4

 

 

$

10.8

 

Interest cost

 

 

5.7

 

 

 

5.5

 

 

 

5.8

 

Expected return on plan assets

 

 

(2.0

)

 

 

(1.9

)

 

 

(2.2

)

Amortization of prior service costs

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.2

 

Amortization of actuarial loss

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

1.4

 

Settlement loss (gain)

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

(2.4

)

Special termination benefits

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.1

 

Net periodic benefit cost

 

$

16.9

 

 

$

16.5

 

 

$

13.7

 

The service cost and amortization of prior service cost components from continuing operations are reported among other employee compensation costs in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The remaining components, interest cost, expected returns on plan assets and amortization of actuarial loss, are reported as Other non-operating items, net in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

The estimated prior service credit for the U.S. defined benefit pension plans that will be amortized from other comprehensive income into net benefit cost over the next fiscal year is immaterial. Amortization of net actuarial losses is expected to be $1.6 million in 2019. Net periodic benefit cost associated with these U.S. plans was $3.4 million in 2018 and is expected to be approximately $9.6 million in 2019. The estimated prior service cost and net actuarial loss for the non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans that will be amortized from other comprehensive income into net benefit cost over the next fiscal year are $0.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively. Net periodic benefit cost associated with these non-U.S. plans was $16.9 million in 2018 and is expected to be around $16.9 million in 2019. The amortization of the net actuarial loss from accumulated other comprehensive income is made over the estimated average remaining service liveslifetime of the plan participants 10 years(28 to 32 years) for the U.S. plans, and 7-33 yearsthe estimated average remaining service lives or lifetimes of the plan participants for the non-U.S. participants,plans, the periods varying over a wide range between the different countries depending on the age of the work force.population concerned.

COMPONENTS OF ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOMELOSS BEFORE TAX RELATED TO CONTINUING OPERATIONS AS OF DECEMBER 31

 

 

U.S.

 

 

Non-U.S.

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Net actuarial loss

 

$

35

 

 

$

62

 

 

$

30

 

 

$

42

 

Prior service cost

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

4

 

Total accumulated other comprehensive loss
   recognized in the balance sheet

 

$

35

 

 

$

62

 

 

$

33

 

 

$

45

 

 

 

U.S.

 

 

Non-U.S.

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Net actuarial loss

 

$

48.0

 

 

$

56.2

 

 

$

30.8

 

 

$

32.6

 

Prior service cost

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

3.1

 

 

 

2.9

 

Total accumulated other comprehensive income

   recognized in the balance sheet

 

$

48.1

 

 

$

56.3

 

 

$

33.9

 

 

$

35.5

 

CHANGES IN ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOMELOSS BEFORE TAX FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIODSYEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31

 

U.S.

 

 

Non-U.S.

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

U.S.

 

 

Non-U.S.

 

Total retirement benefit recognized in accumulated

other comprehensive income at beginning of year

 

$

56.3

 

 

$

95.9

 

 

$

35.5

 

 

$

32.2

 

Net actuarial (gain) loss

 

 

(6.0

)

 

 

(33.4

)

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

2.4

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Total retirement benefit recognized in accumulated
other comprehensive loss at beginning of year

 

$

62

 

$

63

 

$

45

 

$

51

 

Net actuarial loss (gain)

 

(19

)

 

8

 

(8

)

 

(5

)

Amortization of prior service credit (cost)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

0

 

(0

)

 

(0

)

Amortization of actuarial loss

 

 

(2.2

)

 

 

(6.0

)

 

 

(1.5

)

 

 

(2.0

)

 

(7

)

 

(10

)

 

(2

)

 

(2

)

Translation difference

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.4

)

 

 

3.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

2

 

Total retirement benefit recognized in accumulated

other comprehensive income at end of year

 

$

48.1

 

 

$

56.3

 

 

$

33.9

 

 

$

35.5

 

Total retirement benefit recognized in accumulated
other comprehensive loss at end of year

 

$

35

 

 

$

62

 

 

$

33

 

 

$

45

 

The accumulated benefit obligation for the U.S. non-contributory defined benefit pension plans was $314.8$381 million and $336.9$419 million at December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively. The accumulated benefit obligation for the non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans was $167.8$223 million and $173.5$237 million at December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.

Pension plans for which the accumulated benefit obligation (ABO) is notably in excess of the plan assets reside in the following countries: U.S., Mexico, France, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Sweden, Thailand and Sweden.Turkey.

84



PENSION PLANS FOR WHICH ABO EXCEEDS THE FAIR VALUE OF PLAN ASSETS RELATED TO CONTINUING OPERATIONS AS OF DECEMBER 31

 

U.S.

 

 

Non-U.S.

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

U.S.

 

 

Non-U.S.

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2021

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

2020

 

Projected Benefit Obligation (PBO)

 

$

332.1

 

 

$

368.6

 

 

$

143.3

 

 

$

143.6

 

 

$

381

 

$

426

 

$

164

 

$

179

 

Accumulated Benefit Obligation (ABO)

 

 

314.8

 

 

 

336.9

 

 

 

110.8

 

 

 

112.5

 

 

 

381

 

419

 

132

 

143

 

Fair value of plan assets

 

 

272.9

 

 

 

297.9

 

 

 

3.9

 

 

 

4.1

 

 

 

343

 

355

 

4

 

4

 

The Company, in consultation with its actuarial advisors, determines certain key assumptions to be used in calculating the projected benefit obligation and annual net periodic benefit cost.

ASSUMPTIONS USED TO DETERMINE THE BENEFIT OBLIGATIONS AS OF DECEMBER 31

 

U.S.

 

 

Non-U.S.1)

% WEIGHTED AVERAGE

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

2017

 

U.S.

 

 

Non-U.S.1)

(% Weighted average)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

2020

Discount rate

 

 

4.35

 

 

 

3.55

 

 

0.50-3.25

 

0.25-3.25

 

2.77

 

2.37

 

0.25-3.20

 

0.25-2.70

Rate of increases in compensation level

 

 

2.65

 

 

 

2.65

 

 

2.00-5.00

 

2.00-5.00

 

2.65

 

2.65

 

1.80-4.00

 

1.80-4.00

ASSUMPTIONS USED TO DETERMINE THE NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31

 

U.S.

 

% WEIGHTED AVERAGE

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

U.S.

 

(% Weighted average)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Discount rate

 

 

3.55

 

 

 

4.15

 

 

 

4.50

 

 

2.37

 

3.25

 

4.35

 

Rate of increases in compensation level

 

 

2.65

 

 

 

2.65

 

 

 

2.65

 

 

2.65

 

2.65

 

2.65

 

Expected long-term rate of return on assets

 

 

7.08

 

 

 

7.08

 

 

 

7.08

 

 

5.05

 

5.05

 

5.05

 

 

Non-U.S.1)

% WEIGHTED AVERAGE

 

2018

 

2017

 

2016

 

Non-U.S.1)

(% Weighted average)

 

2021

 

2020

 

2019

Discount rate

 

0.25-3.25

 

0.50-3.25

 

0.50-3.60

 

0.25-2.70

 

0.25-2.70

 

0.50-3.25

Rate of increases in compensation level

 

2.00-5.00

 

2.00-5.00

 

2.25-5.00

 

1.80-4.00

 

2.00-5.00

 

2.00-5.00

Expected long-term rate of return on assets

 

2.25-2.50

 

1.50-2.50

 

1.50-3.60

 

1.40-2.25

 

1.50-2.25

 

2.25-2.50

1)The Non-U.S. weighted average plan ranges in the tables above have been prepared usingrepresent significant plans only, which in total represent around 86% of the total Non-U.S. projected benefit obligation.only.

The discount rate for the U.S. plans has been set based on the rates of return on high-quality fixed-income investments currently available at the measurement date and expected to be available during the period the benefits will be paid. The expected timing of cash flows from the plan has also been considered in selecting the discount rate. In particular, the yields on bonds rated AA or better on the measurement date have been used to set the discount rate. The discount rate for the U.K. plan has been set based on the weighted average yields on long-term high-grade corporate bonds and is determined by reference to financial markets on the measurement date.

The expected rate of increase in compensation levels and long-term rate of return on plan assets are determined based on a number of factors and must take into account long-term expectations and reflect the financial environment in the respective local market. The expected return on assets for the U.S. and U.K. plans are based on the fair value of the assets as of December 31.

The level of equity exposure is currently targeted at approximately 40%40% for the primary U.S. plan. The investment objective is to provide an attractive risk-adjusted return that will ensure the payment of benefits while protecting against the risk of substantial investment losses. Correlations among the asset classes are used to identify an asset mix that Autoliv believes will provide the most attractive returns. Long-term return forecasts for each asset class using historical data and other qualitative considerations to adjust for projected economic forecasts are used to set the expected rate of return for the entire portfolio. The Company has assumed a long-term rate of return on the U.S. plan assets of 7.08%5.05% for calculating the 20182021 expense and 5.05%5.05% for calculating the 20192022 expense.

The Company has assumed a long-term rate of return on the non-U.S. plan assets in a range of 2.25-2.50%1.40-2.25 % for 2018.2021. The closed U.K. plan which has a targeted and actual allocation of almost 100%100% debt instruments accounts for approximately 79%80% of the total non-U.S. plan assets.


Autoliv made contributions to the U.S. plan during 20182021 and 20172020 amounting to $6.7$15 million and $6.7$17 million, respectively. Contributions to the U.K. plan during 20182021 and 20172020 amounted to $1.3$2 million and $1.2$2 million, respectively. The Company expects to contribute $7$12 million to its U.S. pension plan in 20192022 and is currently projecting a yearly funding at approximately the same level in the years thereafter. For the UK pension plan, which is the most significant non-U.S. pension plan, the Company expects to contribute $1.2$2 million in 20192022 and in the years thereafter.

85


FAIR VALUE OF TOTAL PLAN ASSETS RELATED TO CONTINUING OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31

 

 

U.S.

 

 

U.S.

 

 

Non-U.S.

 

ASSETS CATEGORY (% Weighted average)

 

Target
allocation

 

 

2021

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

2020

 

Equity securities %

 

 

40

 

 

 

42

 

 

42

 

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

Debt instruments %

 

 

60

 

 

 

57

 

 

57

 

 

 

76

 

 

77

 

Other assets %

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

1

 

 

 

24

 

 

23

 

Total %

 

 

100

 

 

 

100

 

 

100

 

 

 

100

 

 

100

 

 

 

U.S.

 

 

U.S.

 

 

Non-U.S.

 

ASSETS CATEGORY IN % WEIGHTED AVERAGE

 

Target

allocation

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Equity securities

 

 

40

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

56

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Debt instruments

 

 

60

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

79

 

Other assets

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

21

 

Total

 

 

100

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

100

 

The following table summarizes the fair value of the Company’s U.S. and non-U.S. defined benefit pension plan assets:

 

Fair value

measurement at

December 31,

2018

 

 

Fair value

measurement at

December 31,

2017

 

 

Fair value measurement at December 31,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-U.S. Bonds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate

 

 

61.4

 

 

 

66.9

 

 

$

77

 

 

$

80

 

Insurance Contracts

 

 

12.6

 

 

 

13.8

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

18

 

Other Investments

 

 

4.5

 

 

 

7.4

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

10

 

Assets at fair value Level 2

 

 

78.5

 

 

 

88.1

 

 

 

101

 

 

 

107

 

Investments measured at net asset value (NAV):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common collective trusts

 

 

272.3

 

 

 

294.6

 

 

 

343

 

 

 

351

 

Total

 

$

350.8

 

 

$

382.7

 

 

$

445

 

 

$

457

 

The fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Certain assets that are measured at fair value using the NAV per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. Plan assets not measured using the NAV are classified as Level 2 in the table above. Plan assets measured using the NAV mainly relate to the U.S. defined benefit pension plans and are separately disclosed as Common collective trusts below the levelLevel 2 assets in the table above.

The estimated future benefit payments for the pension benefits reflect expected future service, as appropriate. The amount of benefit payments in a given year may vary from the projected amount, especially for the U.S. plan since historically this plan pays the majority of benefits as a lump sum, where the lump sum amounts vary with market interest rates.

PENSION BENEFITS EXPECTED PAYMENTS (dollars in millions)

 

U.S.

 

 

Non-U.S.

 

2022

 

$

20

 

 

$

10

 

2023

 

 

21

 

 

 

9

 

2024

 

 

23

 

 

 

10

 

2025

 

 

24

 

 

 

11

 

2026

 

 

27

 

 

 

11

 

Years 2027-2031

 

 

127

 

 

 

76

 

PENSION BENEFITS EXPECTED PAYMENTS

 

U.S.

 

 

Non-U.S.

 

2019

 

$

13

 

 

$

8

 

2020

 

$

14

 

 

$

8

 

2021

 

$

17

 

 

$

9

 

2022

 

$

19

 

 

$

9

 

2023

 

$

20

 

 

$

10

 

Years 2024-2028

 

$

123

 

 

$

63

 

POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS RELATED TO CONTINUING OPERATIONS

The Company currently provides postretirement health care and life insurance benefits to most of its U.S. retirees.


In general, the terms of the plans provide that U.S. employees who retire after attaining age 55, with 15 years of service (5 years before December 31, 2006), are reimbursed for qualified medical expenses up to a maximum annual amount. Spouses for certain retirees are also eligible for reimbursement under the plan. Life insurance coverage is available for those who elect coverage under the retiree health plan. During 2014, the plan was amended to move from a self-insured model where employees were charged an estimated premium based on anticipated plan expenses for continued coverage, to a plan where retirees are provided a fixed contribution to a Health Retirement Account (HRA). Retirees can use the HRA funds to purchase insurance through a private exchange. Employees hired on or after January 1, 2004 are not eligible to participate in the plan.

The Company has reviewed the impact of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (Medicare Part D) on its financial statements. Although the Plan may currently qualify for a subsidy from Medicare, the amount of the subsidy is so small that the expenses incurred to file for the subsidy may exceed the subsidy itself. Therefore, the impact of any subsidy is ignored in the calculations as Autoliv will not be filing for any reimbursement from Medicare.

86


CHANGES IN BENEFIT OBLIGATION FOR POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS OTHER THAN PENSIONS RELATED TO CONTINUING OPERATIONS AS OF DECEMBER 31

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

 

$

17.8

 

 

$

15.8

 

 

$

21

 

$

18

 

Service cost

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

0

 

0

 

Interest cost

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

1

 

1

 

Actuarial (gains) losses

 

 

(1.2

)

 

 

0.7

 

Actuarial loss

 

(1

)

 

2

 

Benefits paid

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

(0.2

)

 

(0

)

 

(0

)

Other

 

 

(1.7

)

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Benefit obligation at end of year

 

$

15.5

 

 

$

17.8

 

 

$

21

 

$

21

 

The liability for postretirement benefits other than pensions is classified as other non-current liabilities in the balance sheet.

COMPONENTS OF NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE POST RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS OTHER THAN PENSIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31

(Dollars in millions)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Service cost

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

Interest cost

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Amortization of prior service cost

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(2

)

Amortization of actuarial loss

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(0

)

Net periodic benefit (credit)

 

$

(1

)

 

$

(1

)

 

$

(2

)

PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Service cost

 

$

0.3

 

 

$

0.3

 

 

$

0.3

 

Interest cost

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

0.7

 

Amortization of prior service cost

 

 

(2.2

)

 

 

(2.2

)

 

 

(2.2

)

Amortization of actuarial loss

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

(0.5

)

 

 

 

Net periodic benefit (credit) cost

 

$

(1.6

)

 

$

(1.8

)

 

$

(1.2

)

COMPONENTS OF ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME BEFORE TAX ASSOCIATED WITH POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS OTHER THAN PENSIONS RELATED TO CONTINUING OPERATIONS AS OF DECEMBER 31

 

 

U.S.

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Net actuarial loss (gain)

 

$

(4.6

)

 

$

(3.7

)

Prior service cost (credit)

 

 

(8.2

)

 

 

(10.6

)

Total accumulated other comprehensive income

   recognized in the balance sheet

 

$

(12.8

)

 

$

(14.3

)

 

 

U.S.

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Net actuarial (gain) loss

 

$

(1

)

 

$

0

 

Prior service (credit)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(4

)

Total accumulated other comprehensive income
   recognized in the balance sheet

 

$

(3

)

 

$

(4

)

For measuring end-of-year obligations at December 31, 2016, health care trends are not needed due to the fixed-cost nature of the benefits provided in 2014 and beyond. After 2014, all retirees receive a fixed dollar subsidy toward the cost of their health benefits. This individual retiree subsidy will not increase in future years.


The weighted average discount rate used to determine the U.S. postretirement benefit obligation was 4.45%2.91% in 20182021 and 3.75%2.60% in 2017.2020. The average discount rate used in determining the postretirement benefit cost was 3.75%2.60% in 2018, 4.40%2021, 3.50% in 20172020 and 4.65%4.45% in 2016.2019.

A one percentage point increase or decrease in the annual health care cost trend rates would have had no impact on the Company’s net benefit cost for the current period or on the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at December 31, 2017. This is due to the fixed-dollar nature of the benefits provided under the postretirement benefit plan.

The estimated net gain and prior service credit for the postretirement benefit plans that will be amortized from other comprehensive income into net benefit cost over the next fiscal year are approximately $(2.5) million combined.

The estimated future benefit payments for the postretirement benefits set forth below reflect expected future service as appropriate.

POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS (Dollars in millions)

 

EXPECTED
PAYMENTS

 

2022

 

$

1

 

2023

 

 

1

 

2024

 

 

1

 

2025

 

 

1

 

2026

 

 

1

 

Years 2027-2031

 

 

4

 

87


POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

EXPECTED PAYMENTS

 

2019

$

0.4

 

2020

$

0.4

 

2021

$

0.5

 

2022

$

0.5

 

2023

$

0.6

 

Years 2024–2028

$

3.5

 

21.19. Related Party Transactions

Throughout the periods covered by consolidated financial statements, Autoliv purchased finished goods from Veoneer. Related party purchases from Veoneer amounted to approximately $78approximately $69 million and $76$70 million for the full year 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.

Autoliv also subleases certain office space to Veoneer. However, related party sublease income from Veoneer was not material for 2021 and 2020.

Amounts due to and due from related parties as of December 31, 20182021 and December 31, 20172020 are summarized in the below table:

 

 

As of

 

Related party

(Dollars in millions)

 

December 31,

2018

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

Related party receivables

 

$

15.0

 

 

$

 

Related party payables

 

 

50.7

 

 

 

 

 

Related party accrued expenses

 

 

13.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Related party receivables

 

$

1

 

 

$

2

 

Related party payables1)

 

 

15

 

 

 

27

 

Related party accrued expenses1)

 

 

9

 

 

 

10

 

1) Included in Related party liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Related party receivables primarily relate to an agreement between Autoliv and Veoneer.

The related party payables are mainly driven by Reseller Agreements put in placeentered into in connection with the spin-off. The Reseller Agreements are between Autoliv and Veoneer to facilitate the temporary arrangement of the sale of Veoneer products in the interim period post spin-off. For further information, see Note 3. Discontinued Operations above.

The related party accrued expenses consists of indemnification liabilities where Autoliv is required to indemnify Veoneer for certain warranty and recall related claims in connection with the Spin-off.

88



22.20. Segment Information

The Company has one1 operating segment Passive Safety, which includes Autoliv’s airbag and seatbelt products and components. The operating results of the operating segment are regularly reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker to assess the performance of the individual operating segment and make decisions about resources to be allocated to the operating segment.

The Company’s customers consist of all major European, U.S. and Asian automobile manufacturers. Sales to individual customers representing 10% or more of net sales were:

In 2018:2021: Renault 15%13% (including Nissan and Mitsubishi), Stellantis 11% and VW 10%.

In 2020: Renault 13% (including Nissan and Mitsubishi), VW 11%, Stellantis 11% and Honda 10%.

In 2019: Renault 16% (including Nissan and Mitsubishi) and VW 10%10% and Honda 10%.

NET SALES BY REGION (Dollars in millions)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

China

 

$

1,766

 

 

$

1,541

 

 

$

1,525

 

Japan

 

 

733

 

 

 

733

 

 

 

810

 

Rest of Asia

 

 

908

 

 

 

769

 

 

 

841

 

Americas

 

 

2,535

 

 

 

2,337

 

 

 

2,907

 

Europe

 

 

2,289

 

 

 

2,067

 

 

 

2,464

 

Total

 

$

8,230

 

 

$

7,447

 

 

$

8,548

 

In 2017: Renault 15% (including Nissan and Mitsubishi) and Ford 10%.

In 2016: Renault 12% (including Nissan), Ford 10% and Hyundai 10%.

NET SALES BY REGION

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Asia

 

$

3,194.9

 

 

$

2,998.1

 

 

$

2,830.2

 

Whereof: China

 

 

1,522.2

 

 

 

1,421.2

 

 

 

1,385.4

 

Japan

 

 

827.9

 

 

 

787.0

 

 

 

718.6

 

Rest of Asia

 

 

844.8

 

 

 

789.9

 

 

 

726.2

 

Americas

 

 

2,735.1

 

 

 

2,435.2

 

 

 

2,548.0

 

Europe

 

 

2,748.2

 

 

 

2,703.5

 

 

 

2,543.4

 

Total

 

$

8,678.2

 

 

$

8,136.8

 

 

$

7,921.6

 

The Company has attributed net sales to the geographic area based on the location of the entity selling the final product.

External sales in the U.S. amounted to $1,943$1,724 million, $1,689$1,647 million and $1,862$2,090 million in 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. Of the external sales, exports from the U.S. to other regions amounted to approximately $384$280 million, $362$348 million and $423$463 million in 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively.

NET SALES BY PRODUCT (Dollars in millions)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Airbag Products1)

 

$

5,380

 

 

$

4,824

 

 

$

5,676

 

Seatbelt Products1)

 

 

2,850

 

 

 

2,623

 

 

 

2,871

 

Total net sales

 

$

8,230

 

 

$

7,447

 

 

$

8,548

 

1) Including Corporate and other sales.

NET SALES BY PRODUCT

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Airbag Products1)

 

$

5,698.6

 

 

$

5,343.2

 

 

$

5,256.4

 

Seatbelt Products1)

 

 

2,979.6

 

 

 

2,793.6

 

 

 

2,665.2

 

Total net sales

 

$

8,678.2

 

 

$

8,136.8

 

 

$

7,921.6

 

LONG-LIVED ASSETS (Dollars in millions)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

China

 

$

521

 

 

$

508

 

Japan

 

 

178

 

 

 

184

 

Rest of Asia

 

 

293

 

 

 

292

 

Americas

 

 

1,838

 

 

 

1,874

 

Europe

 

 

1,032

 

 

 

1,030

 

Total

 

$

3,862

 

 

$

3,888

 

1)

Including Corporate and other sales.

LONG-LIVED ASSETS

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Asia

 

$

881

 

 

$

975

 

Whereof: China

 

$

500

 

 

$

548

 

Japan

 

$

135

 

 

$

196

 

Rest of Asia

 

$

246

 

 

$

231

 

Americas

 

$

1,708

 

 

$

1,572

 

Europe

 

$

847

 

 

$

843

 

Total

 

$

3,436

 

 

$

3,390

 

Long-lived assets in the U.S. amounted to $1,527$1,774 million and $1,601$1,653 million for 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively. For 2018, $1,2502021 and 2020, $1,393 million (2017, $1,263 million)and $1,235 million, respectively, of the long-lived assets in the U.S. refers to intangible assets, principally from acquisition goodwill.

89



23.21. Earnings Per Share

The computation of basic and diluted EPS under the two-class method were as follows (dollars and shares in millions):

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income from continuing operations

 

$

375.9

 

 

$

586.0

 

 

$

558.4

 

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations

 

 

(185.5

)

 

 

(158.9

)

 

 

8.7

 

Net income attributable to controlling interest

 

 

190.4

 

 

 

427.1

 

 

 

567.1

 

Participating share awards with dividend equivalent rights

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

 

Net income available to common shareholders

 

 

190.4

 

 

 

427.1

 

 

 

567.1

 

Earnings allocated to participating share awards 1)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to common shareholders

 

$

190.4

 

 

$

427.1

 

 

$

567.1

 

Denominator: 1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic: Weighted average common stock

 

 

87.1

 

 

 

87.5

 

 

 

88.2

 

Add: Weighted average stock options/share awards

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.2

 

Diluted:

 

 

87.3

 

 

 

87.7

 

 

 

88.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic EPS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

4.32

 

 

$

6.70

 

 

$

6.33

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

(2.13

)

 

 

(1.82

)

 

 

0.10

 

Basic EPS

 

$

2.19

 

 

$

4.88

 

 

$

6.43

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted EPS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

4.31

 

 

$

6.68

 

 

$

6.32

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

(2.13

)

 

 

(1.81

)

 

 

0.10

 

Diluted EPS

 

$

2.18

 

 

$

4.87

 

 

$

6.42

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Numerator: 1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to common shareholders

 

$

435

 

 

$

187

 

 

$

462

 

Denominator: 1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic weighted average common stock

 

 

87.5

 

 

 

87.3

 

 

 

87.2

 

Added: Weighted average stock options/share awards

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.2

 

Diluted weighted average common stock

 

 

87.7

 

 

 

87.5

 

 

 

87.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic EPS

 

$

4.97

 

 

$

2.14

 

 

$

5.29

 

Diluted EPS

 

$

4.96

 

 

$

2.14

 

 

$

5.29

 

1) The Company’s unvested RSUs and PSs, of which some included the right to receive non-forfeitable dividend equivalents, are considered participating securities. Calculations of EPS under the two-class method exclude from the numerator any dividends paid or owed on participating securities and any undistributed earnings considered to be attributable to participating securities. The related participating securities are similarly excluded from the denominator. However, these participating securities have been immaterial for all the years presented.

1)

The Company’s unvested RSUs and PSs, of which some included the right to receive non-forfeitable dividend equivalents, are considered participating securities. Calculations of EPS under the two-class method exclude from the numerator any dividends paid or owed on participating securities and any undistributed earnings considered to be attributable to participating securities. The related participating securities are similarly excluded from the denominator.

There were no antidilutiveAnti-dilutive shares outstanding for the yearyears ended December 31, 2018, approximately 0.1 million antidilutive shares outstanding for the year ended December 31, 20172021, 2020 and 0.2 million antidilutive shares outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2016.2019 were immaterial.

24.22. Subsequent Events

There were no reportable events subsequent to December 31, 2018.2021.


90


25. Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)

2018

Q1

 

 

Q2

 

 

Q3

 

 

Q4

 

Net sales

$

2,240.9

 

 

$

2,211.5

 

 

$

2,033.0

 

 

$

2,192.8

 

Gross profit

 

460.3

 

 

 

439.7

 

 

 

386.1

 

 

 

425.2

 

Income from Continuing Operations before income taxes

 

228.9

 

 

 

210.1

 

 

 

171.3

 

 

 

2.1

 

Income from Continuing Operations

 

159.1

 

 

 

193.2

 

 

 

118.0

 

 

 

(92.8

)

Net income attributable to controlling interest from Continuing Operations

 

158.7

 

 

 

192.7

 

 

 

117.5

 

 

 

(93.0

)

Earnings per share Continuing Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

– basic

 

1.82

 

 

 

2.21

 

 

 

1.35

 

 

 

(1.07

)

– diluted

 

1.82

 

 

 

2.20

 

 

 

1.34

 

 

 

(1.06

)

Dividends paid

 

0.60

 

 

 

0.62

 

 

 

0.62

 

 

 

0.62

 

2017

Q1

 

 

Q2

 

 

Q3

 

 

Q4

 

Net sales

$

2,041.6

 

 

$

1,983.9

 

 

$

1,952.6

 

 

$

2,158.7

 

Gross profit

 

428.7

 

 

 

415.3

 

 

 

394.9

 

 

 

440.8

 

Income from Continuing Operations before income taxes

 

199.7

 

 

 

201.2

 

 

 

150.7

 

 

 

240.8

 

Income from Continuing Operations

 

148.3

 

 

 

136.1

 

 

 

106.2

 

 

 

197.4

 

Net income attributable to controlling interest from Continuing Operations

 

147.9

 

 

 

135.7

 

 

 

105.7

 

 

 

196.7

 

Earnings per share Continuing Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

– basic

 

1.67

 

 

 

1.54

 

 

 

1.22

 

 

 

2.26

 

– diluted

 

1.67

 

 

 

1.54

 

 

 

1.21

 

 

 

2.26

 

Dividends paid

 

0.58

 

 

 

0.60

 

 

 

0.60

 

 

 

0.60

 

Quarterly movements

In the fourth quarter of 2018, income from Continuing Operations before taxes was negatively impacted by the Company recognizing an accrual of $210 million in connection with the remaining portion of the European Commission’s investigation of anti-competitive behavior among suppliers of occupant safety systems in the European Union.

EXCHANGE RATES FOR KEY CURRENCIES VS. U.S.

 

 

2018

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2014

 

 

 

Average

 

 

Year end

 

 

Average

 

 

Year end

 

 

Average

 

 

Year end

 

 

Average

 

 

Year end

 

 

Average

 

 

Year end

 

EUR

 

 

1.182

 

 

 

1.145

 

 

 

1.129

 

 

 

1.196

 

 

 

1.106

 

 

 

1.052

 

 

 

1.110

 

 

 

1.094

 

 

 

1.327

 

 

 

1.218

 

CNY

 

 

0.151

 

 

 

0.146

 

 

 

0.148

 

 

 

0.154

 

 

 

0.150

 

 

 

0.144

 

 

 

0.159

 

 

 

0.154

 

 

 

0.162

 

 

 

0.161

 

JPY/1000

 

 

9.061

 

 

 

9.051

 

 

 

8.916

 

 

 

8.878

 

 

 

9.222

 

 

 

8.544

 

 

 

8.261

 

 

 

8.303

 

 

 

9.452

 

 

 

8.367

 

KRW/1000

 

 

0.909

 

 

 

0.896

 

 

 

0.885

 

 

 

0.937

 

 

 

0.863

 

 

 

0.832

 

 

 

0.885

 

 

 

0.854

 

 

 

0.950

 

 

 

0.913

 

MXN

 

 

0.052

 

 

 

0.051

 

 

 

0.053

 

 

 

0.051

 

 

 

0.053

 

 

 

0.048

 

 

 

0.063

 

 

 

0.058

 

 

 

0.075

 

 

 

0.068

 

SEK

 

 

0.115

 

 

 

0.111

 

 

 

0.117

 

 

 

0.121

 

 

 

0.117

 

 

 

0.110

 

 

 

0.119

 

 

 

0.120

 

 

 

0.146

 

 

 

0.128

 

BRL

 

 

0.276

 

 

 

0.258

 

 

 

0.313

 

 

 

0.302

 

 

 

0.289

 

 

 

0.307

 

 

 

0.306

 

 

 

0.259

 

 

 

0.426

 

 

 

0.370

 


Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with AccountantsAccountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

There have been no changes to and no disagreements with our independent auditors regarding accounting or financial disclosure matters in our two most recent fiscal years.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation has been carried out by the Company’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

(a) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.

Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Company’s board of directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of Autoliv’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018.2021. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013 framework).

Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2018,2021, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.

(b) Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

Ernst & Young AB has issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein as the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm under Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for the year ended December 31, 2018.2021.

(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15 13a-15-(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended December 31, 20182021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.


91


PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive OfficersOfficers and Corporate Governance

The information required by Item 10. regarding executive officers, directors and nominees for election as directors of Autoliv, Autoliv’s Audit Committee, Autoliv’s code of ethics, and compliance with Section 16(A) of the Securities Exchange Act is incorporated herein by reference from the information under the captions “Executive Officers of the Company” and “Item“Proposal 1: Election of Directors”, “Committees of the Board” and “Audit Committee Report”, “Corporate Governance Guidelines and Codes of Conduct and Ethics”, and “Section“Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”Reports”, respectively, in the Company’s 20192022 Proxy Statement. Information on Board meeting attendance is provided under the caption “Board Meetings” in the 20192022 Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by Item 11. regarding executive compensation for the year ended December 31, 20182021 is included under the captionscaption “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Executive Compensation” in the 20192022 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. The information required by the same item regarding Leadership Development and Compensation Committee is included in the sections “Compensation“Leadership Development and Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” and “Leadership Development and Compensation Committee Report” in the 20192022 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by Item 12. regarding beneficial ownership of Autoliv’s common stock is included under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the 20192022 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Shares Previously Authorized for Issuance Under the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2018,2021, about the common stock that may be issued under the Autoliv, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan. The Company does not have any equity compensation plans that have not been approved by its stockholders.

Plan Category

 

(a) Number of
Securities to
be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

 

 

(b) Weighted-
average exercise
price of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights(2)

 

 

(c) Number of
securities remaining
available for future
issuance under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column
(a))(3)

 

Equity compensation plans
   approved by security
   holders (1)

 

 

447,454

 

 

$

68.71

 

 

 

2,772,250

 

Equity compensation plans
   not approved by security
   holders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

447,454

 

 

$

68.71

 

 

 

2,772,250

 

Plan Category

 

(a) Number of

Securities to

be issued upon

exercise of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights

 

 

(b) Weighted-

average exercise

price of outstanding

options, warrants

and rights(2)

 

 

(c) Number of

securities remaining

available for future

issuance under equity

compensation plans

(excluding securities

reflected in column

(a))(3)

 

Equity compensation plans approved

   by security holders (1)

 

 

404,148

 

 

$

63.43

 

 

 

3,190,663

 

Equity compensation plans not

   approved by security holders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

404,148

 

 

$

63.43

 

 

 

3,190,663

 

(1)
Autoliv, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on May 6, 2009, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated December 17, 2010 and Amendment No. 2 dated May 8, 2012.
(2)
Excludes restricted stock units and performance shares which convert to shares of common stock for no consideration.
(3)
All such shares are available for issuance pursuant to grants of full-value stock awards.

(1)

Autoliv, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on May 6, 2009, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated December 17, 2010 and Amendment No. 2 dated May 8, 2012.

(2)

Excludes restricted stock units and performance shares which convert to shares of common stock for no consideration.

(3)

All such shares are available for issuance pursuant to grants of full-value stock awards.

Information regarding the Company’s policy and procedures concerning related party transactions is included under the caption “Related Person Transactions” in the 20192022 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. Information regarding director independence can be found under the caption “Board Independence” in the 20192022 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The information required by Item 9(e) of Schedule 14A regarding principal accounting fees and the information required by Item 14 regarding the pre-approval process of accounting services provided to Autoliv is included under the caption “Ratification“Proposal 3. Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors”Registered Public Accounting Firm Appointment” in the 20192022 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

92



PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and FinancialFinancial Statement Schedules

(a)

Documents Filed as Part of this Report

(a)
Documents Filed as Part of this Report

(1)

Financial Statements

(1)
Financial Statements

(i)

Consolidated Statements of Net Income – Years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016;

(i)
Consolidated Statements of Income – Years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019;

(ii)

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income – Years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016;

(ii)
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income – Years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019;

(iii)

Consolidated Balance Sheets – as of December 31, 2018 and 2017;

(iii)
Consolidated Balance Sheets – as of December 31, 2021 and 2020;

(iv)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016;

(iv)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019;

(v)

Consolidated Statements of Total Equity – as of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016;

(v)
Consolidated Statements of Total Equity – as of December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019;

(vi)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements; and

(vi)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements; and

(vii)

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

(vii)
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB Auditor ID No. 1433).

(2)

Financial Statement Schedules

(2)
Financial Statement Schedules

All of the schedules specified under Regulation S-X to be provided by Autoliv have been omitted either because they are not applicable, they are not required, or the information required is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.

(3)

Exhibits

(3)
Exhibits

Exhibit

No.

Description

  2.1

Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 16, 2015, by and among Autoliv ASP Inc., M/A-COM Technology Solutions Inc., M/A-COM Auto Solutions Inc. and, for the limited purposes specified therein, M/A-COM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 17, 2015).

  2.2

Distribution Agreement, dated June 28, 2018, between Veoneer, Inc. and Autoliv, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 2, 2018).

  3.1

Autoliv’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 22, 2015).

  3.2

Autoliv’s Third Restated By-Laws, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date December 18, 2015).

  4.1

Indenture, dated March 30, 2009, between Autoliv, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Autoliv’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A (File No. 001-12933, filing date March 30, 2009).

  4.2

Second Supplemental Indenture (including Form of Global Note), dated March 15, 2012, between Autoliv, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date March 15, 2012).

  4.3

Form of Note Purchase and Guaranty Agreement dated April 23, 2014, among Autoliv ASP, Inc., Autoliv, Inc. and the purchasers named therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 25, 2014).

  4.4

Amendment and Waiver 2014 Note Purchase and Guaranty Agreement, dated May 24, 2018 among Autoliv, Inc., Autoliv ASP, Inc. and the noteholders named therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 27, 2018).

  4.5

General Terms and Conditions for Swedish Depository Receipts in Autoliv, Inc., representing common shares in Autoliv, Inc., effective as of May 30, 2018 with Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ) serving as a custodian, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 27, 2018).

  4.6

Agency Agreement dated June 26, 2018 among Autoliv, Inc., Autoliv ASP Inc. and HSBC Bank PLC, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 27, 2018).

10.1+  4.7

Form of EmploymentBase Listing Particulars Agreement, betweendated April 11, 2019, among Autoliv, Inc., Autoliv ASP, Inc. and certain of its executive officers,the dealers named therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.44.7 to the AnnualQuarterly Report on Form 10-K/A10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 2, 2002)April 26, 2019).

10.2+  4.8

Form of SupplementaryBase Listing Particulars Agreement, to the Employment Agreement betweendated February 21, 2020, among Autoliv, Inc., Autoliv ASP, Inc. and certain of its executive officers,the dealers named therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.54.10 to the AnnualQuarterly Report on Form 10-K/A10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 2, 2002)April 24, 2020).

10.3+  4.9

Form of SeveranceBase Listing Particulars Agreement, betweendated February 19, 2021, among Autoliv, Inc., Autoliv ASP, Inc., and certain of its executive officers,the dealers named therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.74.13 to the AnnualQuarterly Report on Form 10-K/A10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 2, 2002).April 23, 2021)

93


10.4+  4.10

Form of Amendment to EmploymentAmended and Restated Programme Agreement, betweendated February 19, 2021, among Autoliv, Inc., Autoliv ASP, Inc., and certain of its executive officers – notice,the dealers named therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.94.14 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 23, 2021)

  4.11

Amended and Restated Agency Agreement, dated February 19, 2021, among Autoliv, Inc., Autoliv ASP, Inc., and the dealers named therein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.15 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 23, 2021)

  4.12

Description of Registrant´s Securities, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date March 14, 2003)February 19, 2021).


Exhibit

No.

Description

10.5+

Form of Supplementary Agreement to Employment Agreement between Autoliv, Inc. and certain of its executive officers – pension, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date March 14, 2003).

10.6+10.1+

Form of Pension Agreement between Autoliv, Inc. and certain of its executive officers – additional pension, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date March 14, 2003).

10.7+

Employment Agreement, dated March 31, 2007, between Autoliv, Inc. and Mr. Jan Carlson, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date October 25, 2007).

10.8+

Retirement Benefits Agreement, dated August 14, 2007, between Autoliv AB and Mr. Jan Carlson, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date October 25, 2007).

10.9+

Autoliv, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on May 6, 2009, incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A of the Definitive Proxy Statement of Autoliv, Inc. on Schedule 14A (filing date March 23, 2009).

10.1010.2

Revolving Credit Facility Agreement, dated June 21, 2010, between Autoliv AB, Autoliv, Inc., and Nordea Bank AB (publ), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 23, 2010).

10.1110.3

Facility Agreement, dated June 21, 2010, among Autoliv, Inc., Autoliv AB, Swedish Export Credit Corporation, National Export Credits Guarantee Board and Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 23, 2010).

10.12+10.4+

Amendment No. 1 to the Autoliv, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan as amended and restated on May 6, 2009, dated December 17, 2010, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date February 23, 2011).

10.13+10.5

Form of Amendment to Employment Agreement between Autoliv, Inc. and certain of its executive officers – pension, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date February 23, 2012).

10.14+

Form of Amendment to Employment Agreement between Autoliv, Inc. and certain of its executive officers – non-equity incentive award, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date February 23, 2012).

10.15+

Amendment, dated December 19, 2011, to Employment Agreement, dated March 31, 2007, between Autoliv, Inc. and Mr. Jan Carlson (pension), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date February 23, 2012).

10.16

Remarketing Agreement, dated as of February 9, 2012, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date March 15, 2012).

10.17+10.6+

Amendment No. 2 to the Autoliv, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on May 6, 2009, dated May 8, 2012, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 20, 2012).

10.18+10.7†

Amendment, dated January 18, 2013 to Employment Agreement, dated March 31, 2007, between Autoliv, Inc. and Mr. Jan Carlson – additional pension, dated January 18, 2013, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date February 22, 2013).

10.19+

Form of Employment Agreement between Autoliv, Inc. and certain of its executive officers (with Change-in-Control Severance Agreement), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date February 22, 2013).

10.20+

Form of Employment Agreement between Autoliv, Inc. and certain of its executive officers (without Change-in-Control Severance Agreement), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date February 22, 2013).

10.21+

Form of Change-in-Control Severance Agreement between Autoliv, Inc. and certain of its executive officers, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date February 22, 2013).

10.22

Form of Indemnification Agreement between Autoliv, Inc. and its directors and certain of its executive officers, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.i to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date February 24, 2009).

10.23†

Finance Contract, dated July 16, 2013, among European Investment Bank, Autoliv AB (publ) and Autoliv, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date October 24, 2013).

10.2410.8

Guarantee Agreement, dated July 16, 2013, between European Investment Bank and Autoliv, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date October 24, 2013).


Exhibit

No.

Description

10.9

10.25

Form of Note Purchase and Guaranty Agreement, dated April 23, 2014, among Autoliv ASP, Inc., Autoliv, Inc. and the purchasers named therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 25, 2014).

10.26+10.10

Form of Supplement to Employment Agreement between Autoliv, Inc. and certain of its executive officers, dated August 13, 2014 and effective as of September 1, 2014, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date October 23, 2014).

10.27

Amendment, dated January 27, 2015, to the Finance Contract, dated July 16, 2013, among European Investment Bank, Autoliv AB (publ) and Autoliv, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the Annual Report on Form 10- K (File No. 001-12933, filing date February 19, 2015).

10.2810.11

Consulting Agreement, dated as of July 16, 2015, by and between Autoliv ASP Inc. and M/A-COM Technology Solutions Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 17, 2015).

10.29+

International Assignment Agreement, dated as of August 27, 2015, by and among Autoliv ASP, Inc., Autoliv AB and Steven Fredin, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date August 28, 2015).

10.30+

Employment Agreement, dated August 20, 2015, between Autoliv, Inc. and Lars Sjöbring, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date February 19, 2016).

10.31+

Separation Agreement, dated November 20, 2015, between Autoliv, Inc. and Mats Wallin, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date February 19, 2016).

10.32

General Terms and Conditions for Swedish Depository Receipts in Autoliv, Inc. representing common shares in Autoliv, Inc., effective as of May 30,, 2018, with Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ) serving as custodian, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 27, 2018).

10.33+10.12

Form of performance shares award agreement to be used under the Autoliv, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 29, 2016).

10.34+

Form of restricted stock units award agreement to be used under the Autoliv, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 29, 2016).

10.35+

Employment Agreement, dated November 20, 2015, between Autoliv, Inc. and Mats Backman, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 22, 2016).

10.36+

Employment Agreement, dated December 15, 2015, between Autoliv, Inc. and Mikael Bratt, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 22, 2016).

10.37

Facilities Agreement of $1,100,000,000, dated July 14, 2016, among Autoliv, Inc., Autoliv ASP, Inc., Autoliv AB, HSBC Bank PLC, Mizuho Bank, Ltd. and Investment Banking, Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ), and the other parties and lenders named therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date October 27, 2016).

10.38+10.13+

Mutual Separation Agreement, dated May 31, 2016 and effective as of May 18, 2016, between Autoliv, Inc. and Jonas Nilsson, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date October 27, 2016).

10.39+

Mutual Separation Agreement, dated September 30, 2016 and effective as of October 1, 2016, between Autoliv, Inc. and Frank Melzer, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date October 27, 2016).

10.40+

Supplement to Employment Agreement, dated October 3, 2016, between Autoliv, Inc. and Johan Löfvenholm, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.47 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date February 23, 2017).

10.41+

Supplement to Employment Agreement, dated October 3, 2016, between Autoliv, Inc. and Steve Fredin, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.48 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date February 23, 2017).

10.42+

Autoliv, Inc. Non-employee Director Compensation Policy, effective January 1, 2017, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 28, 2017).

10.43+

Amendment No. 3 to the Autoliv, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, dated April 24, 2017, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 28, 2017).

10.44+10.14+

Form of Non-Employee Director restricted stock unit award agreement to be used under the Autoliv, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 28, 2017).


Exhibit

No.

Description

10.45+

Form of Employee restricted stock unit award agreement (2017) to be used under the Autoliv, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 28, 2017).

10.46+10.15+

Form of performance share award agreement (2017) to be used under the Autoliv, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 28, 2017).

10.47+*10.16

Mutual Separation Agreement, dated March 23, 2018 and effective as of December 31, 2018, between Autoliv, Inc. and Karin Eliasson.

10.48

Employee Matters Agreement, dated June 28, 2018, between Veoneer, Inc. and Autoliv, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 2, 2018).

10.4910.17

Tax Matters Agreement, dated June 28, 2018, between Veoneer, Inc. and Autoliv, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 2, 2018).

94


10.18

10.50

Amended and Restated Transition Services Agreement, dated June 28, 2018, between Veoneer, Inc. and Autoliv, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 2, 2018).

10.51

Facilities Agreement, dated May 24, 2018, among Autoliv, Inc., Autoliv ASP, J.P. Morgan Securities PLC and Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 27, 2018).

10.5210.19+

Separation Agreement, effective as of September 1, 2018, by and between Autoliv, Inc. and Steve Fredin, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 27, 2018).

10.53

Interim Employment Agreement, effective as of April 1, 2018, by and between Veoneer, Inc. and Jan Carlson, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 27, 2018).

10.54

Supplement to Employment Agreement, effective as of April 1, 2018, by and between Autoliv, Inc. and Jan Carlson, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 27, 2018).

10.55

Employment Agreement, effective as of June 29, 2018, by and between Autoliv, Inc. and Mikael Bratt, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 27, 2018).

10.5610.20+

Employment Agreement, effective as of June 29, 2018, by and between Autoliv, Inc. and Jennifer Cheng, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 27, 2018).

10.57

Employment Agreement, effective as of June 29, 2018, by and between Autoliv, Inc. and Daniel Garceau, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 27, 2018).

10.58

Employment Agreement, effective as of June 29, 2018, by and between Autoliv, Inc. and Michael A. Hague, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 27, 2018).

10.59

Employment Agreement, effective as of June 29, 2018, by and between Autoliv, Inc. and Jordi Lombarte incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 27, 2018).

10.6010.21+

Employment Agreement, effective as of June 29, 2018, by and between Autoliv, Inc. and Bradley J. Murray, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 27, 2018).

10.61

Employment Agreement, effective as of June 29, 2018, by and between Autoliv, Inc. and Anthony J. Nellis, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 27, 2018).

10.6210.22

EmploymentCooperation Agreement, effective as of June 29, 2018, by anddated March 1, 2019, between Autoliv, Inc. and Sherry Vasa,Cevian Capital II GP Limited, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1510.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date March 1, 2019).

10.23+

Form of Employee restricted stock unit grant agreement (2019) to be used under the Autoliv, Inc 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 26, 2019).

10.24+

Form of Employee performance share grant agreement (2019) to be used under the Autoliv, Inc 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 26, 2019).

10.25

SEK Facility Agreement dated June 24, 2019 between Autoliv, Inc., Autoliv ASP, Inc. and AB Svensk Exportkredit (Publ),incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 27, 2018)19, 2019).

10.26+

Employment Agreement, dated April 23, 2019, between Autoliv, Inc. and Frithjof Oldorff, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date October 25, 2019).

21*10.27+

Employment Agreement, dated March 18, 2019, between Autoliv, Inc. and Christian Swahn, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date October 25, 2019).

10.28+

Employment Agreement, dated February 15, 2019, between Autoliv, Inc. and Magnus Jarlegren, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date October 25, 2019).

10.29

Form of Indemnification Agreement between Autoliv, Inc. and its directors and certain of its executive officers, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date October 25, 2019).

10.30+

Employment Agreement, dated November 26, 2019 and effective as of March 1, 2020, between Autoliv, Inc. and Fredrik Westin, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.56 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date February 21, 2020).

10.31+

Employment Agreement, dated January 23, 2020, between Autoliv, Inc. and Svante Mogefors, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.58 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date February 21, 2020).

10.32+

Form of Employee 2020 restricted stock units grant agreement promised under the Autoliv, Inc 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 24, 2020).

10.33+

Form of Employee 2020 performance share units grant agreement promised under the Autoliv, Inc 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 24, 2020).

10.34

Facility Agreement, dated May 28, 2020, by and among Autoliv AB, as borrower, Autoliv, Inc. and Autoliv ASP, as guarantors, and AB Svensk Exportkredit, as lender, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 17, 2020).

10.35+

Form of Non-Employee Directors 2020 restricted stock units grant agreement under the Autoliv, Inc 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 17, 2020).

10.36+

Employment Agreement, dated May 20, 2020 and effective as of July 1, 2020, between Autoliv, Inc. and Per Ericson, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 17, 2020).

10.37+

Employment Agreement, dated June 8, 2020 and effective as of June 15, 2020, between Autoliv, Inc. and Kevin Fox, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 17, 2020).

95


10.38+

Employment Agreement, effective as of August 17, 2020, by and between Autoliv AB and Mikael Hagström incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date October 23, 2020).

10.39+

Amendment No. 2, effective as of March 9, 2021, to Employment Agreement, effective March 21, 2018, by and between Autoliv Inc. and Jordi Lombarte incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 23, 2021).

10.40+

Employment Agreement, dated October 1, 2020 and effective as of November 1, 2020, by and between Autoliv Inc. and Colin Naughton incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 23, 2021).

10.41+

Form of Employee 2021 restricted stock units grant agreement promised under the Autoliv, Inc 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 23, 2021).

10.42+

Form of Employee 2021 performance share units grant agreement promised under the Autoliv, Inc 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 23, 2021).

10.43+

Amendment No. 1, effective as of April 1, 2021, to Employment Agreement, effective March 18, 2019, by and between Autoliv Inc. and Christian Swahn incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 23, 2021).

10.44+

Form of Non-Employee Directors 2021 restricted stock units grant agreement under Autoliv, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 16, 2021).

10.45+*

Autoliv, Inc. Non-employee Director Compensation Policy, effective May 1, 2021.

10.46+*

Employment Agreement, dated December 14, 2021 and effective as of January 19, 2021, by and between Autoliv Inc. and Sng Yih.

21*

Autoliv’s List of Subsidiaries.

23*

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

31.1*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

31.2*

Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


Exhibit

No.

Description

32.1*

32.1*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2*

Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101*101.INS*

Inline XBRL Instance Document – The following financial information frominstance document does not appear in the Annual Report on Form 10-K forInteractive Date File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, formatted ininline XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) and filed electronically herewith: (i)document.

101.SCH*

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL*

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF*

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

101.LAB*

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE*

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

104*

Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Consolidated Statements of Net Income; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; (v) the Consolidated Statements of Total Equity; and (vi) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.inline XBRL document).

*

Filed herewith.

+

Management contract or compensatory plan.

Confidential treatment requested as to portions of the exhibit. Confidential materials omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


* Filed herewith.

+ Management contract or compensatory plan.

SIGNATURES† Confidential treatment requested as to portions of the exhibit. Confidential materials omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Pursuant96


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of SectionSection 13 or 15(d) of the SecuritiesSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrantregistrant has duly caused this reportthis report to be signed on its behalfits behalf by the undersigned, thereuntothereunto duly authorized,authorized, as of February 21, 2019.22, 2022.

AUTOLIV, INC.

(Registrant)

By

/s/ Mats BackmanFredrik Westin

Mats Backman

Fredrik Westin

Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to thethe requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, thisthis report has been signedsigned below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacitiescapacities indicated, as of February 21, 2019.22, 2022.

Title

Name

Name

Chairman of the Board of Directors

/s/ Jan Carlson

Jan Carlson

Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Mikael Bratt

and Director

Mikael Bratt

Chief Financial Officer

/s/ Fredrik Westin

Chief(Principal Financial Officerand Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ Mats Backman

Fredrik Westin

(Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)

Mats Backman

Director

/s/ Laurie Brlas

Director

Laurie Brlas

Director

/s/ Hasse Johansson

Hasse Johansson

Director

/s/ Leif Johansson

Leif Johansson

Director

/s/ David E. KeplerFranz-Josef Kortüm

David E. Kepler

Franz-Josef Kortüm

Director

/s/ Franz-Josef KortümFrédéric Lissalde

Franz-Josef Kortüm

Frédéric Lissalde

Director

/s/ XiaozhiMin Liu

Xiaozhi

Min Liu

Director

/s/ James M. RinglerXiaozhi Liu

James M. Ringler

Xiaozhi Liu

Director

/s/ Martin Lundstedt

Martin Lundstedt

Director

/s/ Thaddeus Senko

Thaddeus Senko


97


Glossary and Definitions

In this report, the following company or industry specific terms and abbreviations are used:

BCC

Best Cost CountryCountry.

CASH CONVERSION

Free cash flow in relation to net income.

CAPITAL EMPLOYED

Total equity and net debt (net cash).

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES

Investments in property, plant and equipment.

CAPITAL TURN-OVER RATE

Annual sales in relation to average capital employed.

CPV

Content Per Vehicle, i.e. value of the safety products in a vehicle.

DAYS INVENTORY OUTSTANDING

Outstanding inventory relative to average daily sales.

DAYS RECEIVABLES OUTSTANDING

Outstanding receivables relative to average daily sales.

DEVELOPED MARKETS

Includes North America, Western Europe, Japan and South Korea

EARNINGS PER SHARE

Net income attributable to controlling interest relative to weighted average number of shares (net of treasury shares) assuming dilution and basic, respectively.

EBIT

Earnings before interest and taxes.

EBITDA

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization

FREE CASH FLOW NET

Cash flows from operating activities less capital expenditures, net.

GROSS MARGIN

Gross profit relative to sales.

GROWTH MARKETS

Includes all markets except North America, Western Europe, Japan and South KoreaKorea.

HCCHEADCOUNT

High Cost Country

HEADCOUNT

Employees plus temporary hourly personnel.


INVENTORY OUTSTANDING IN RELATION TO SALES

Outstanding inventory relative to annualized fourth quarter sales.

98


LEVERAGE RATIO

Debt per the Policy (Net debt adjusted for pension liabilities) in relation to EBITDA per the Policy (Adjusted EBITDA) (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization)Amortization, other non-operating items, net, income from equity method investments and capacity alignments), see Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures in Item 7 for a calculation of this non-U.S. GAAP measure.

LMPU

Labor minutes per produced unit.

LVP

Light vehicle production of light motor vehicles with a gross weight of up to 3.5 metric tons.

This 10-K includes content supplied by IHS Markit Automotive; Copyright © Light Vehicle Production Forecast, January 2022. All rights reserved. IHS Markit is a global supplier of independent industry information. The permission to use IHS Markit copyrighted reports, data and information does not constitute an endorsement or approval by IHS Markit of the manner, format, context, content, conclusion, opinion or viewpoint in which IHS Markit reports, data and information or its derivations are used or referenced herein.

NET DEBT (CASH)

Short and long-term debt including debt-related derivatives less cash and cash equivalents, see Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures in Item 7 for a reconciliation of this non-U.S. GAAP measure.

NET DEBT TO CAPITALIZATION

Net debt in relation to total equity (including non-controlling interest) and net debt.

NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES

Employees with a continuous employment agreement, recalculated to full time equivalent heads.

OEM

Original Equipment Manufacturer referring to customers assembling new vehicles.

OPERATING MARGIN

Operating income relative to sales.

OPERATING WORKING CAPITAL

Current assets excluding cash and cash equivalents less current liabilities excluding short-term debt. Any current derivatives reported in current assets and current liabilities related to net debt are excluded from operating working capital. See Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures in Item 7 for reconciliation of this non-U.S. GAAP measure.

OUR MARKET

Our products include seatbelts, airbags and steering wheels.

PAYABLES OUTSTANDING IN RELATION TO SALES

Outstanding payables relative to annualized fourth quarter sales.

PRETAX MARGIN

Income before taxes relative to sales.

RECEIVABLES OUTSTANDING IN RELATION TO SALES

Outstanding receivables relative to annualized fourth quarter sales.

RETURN ON CAPITAL EMPLOYED

Operating income and equity in earnings of affiliates, relative to average capital employed.

99


RETURN ON TOTAL EQUITY

Net income relative to average total equity.

ROA

Rest of Asia includes all Asian countries except China and Japan.

TOTAL EQUITY RATIO

Total equity relative to total assets.

TRADE WORKING CAPITAL

105Outstanding receivables and outstanding inventory less outstanding payables.

100