Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates was ~~$250.3~~$412.1 million.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement relating to the ~~2021~~2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed within 120 days after December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Unless we state otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to “we,” “our,” “us,” “the Company” and “Equity” refer to Equity Bancshares, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, including Equity Bank, which we sometimes refer to as “Equity Bank,” “the Bank” or “our Bank.”

The information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K is accurate only as of the date of this annual report and as of the dates specified herein.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).” These forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to, among other things, future events and our financial performance. These statements are often, but not always, made through the use of words or phrases such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “predict,” “potential,” “believe,” “will likely result,” “expect,” “continue,” “will,” “anticipate,” “seek,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “forecast,” “goal,” “target,” “would” and “outlook,” or the negative variations of those words or other comparable words of a future or forward-looking nature. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts and are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, management’s beliefs and certain assumptions made by management, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and beyond our control. Accordingly, we caution you that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, assumptions and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable as of the date made, actual results may prove to be materially different from the results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. When considering forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the risk factors and other cautionary statements described in “Item 1A – Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

There are or will be important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated in these forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the following:

The foregoing factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with other cautionary statements that are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If one or more events related to these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may differ materially from what we anticipate. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date when it is made and we do not undertake any obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise. New risks and uncertainties arise from time to time and it is not possible for us to predict those events or how they may affect us. In addition, we cannot assess the impact of each factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements, expressed or implied, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. This cautionary statement should also be considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that we or persons acting on our behalf may issue.

Our principal objective is to increase stockholder value and generate consistent earnings growth by expanding our commercial banking franchise both organically and through strategic acquisitions. We strive to provide an enhanced banking experience for our customers by providing them with a comprehensive suite of sophisticated banking products and services tailored to meet their needs while delivering the high-quality relationship-based customer service of a community bank.

We were founded in November 2002 by our Chairman and CEO, Brad S. Elliott. Mr. Elliott believed that, as a result of in-market consolidation, there existed an opportunity to build an attractive commercial banking franchise and create long-term value for our stockholders. Following thirteen years’ experience as a finance executive, including serving as a Regional President for a Kansas bank with over $1.0 billion in assets, Mr. Elliott implemented his banking vision of developing a strategic consolidator of community banks and a destination for seasoned bankers and businesspersons who share our entrepreneurial spirit. In 2003, we raised capital from 23 local investors to finance the acquisition of National Bank of Andover in Andover, Kansas.

We believe we have a successful track record of selectively acquiring, integrating and consolidating community banks and branch networks. Our acquisition activity includes the following transactions.

In conjunction with our strategic acquisition growth, we strive to reposition and improve the loan portfolio and deposit mix of the banks we acquire. Following our acquisitions, we focus on identifying and disposing of problematic loans and replacing them with higher quality loans generated organically. In addition, we focus on growth in our commercial loan portfolio primarily by hiring additional talented bankers, particularly in our metropolitan markets, and incentivizing our bankers to expand their commercial banking relationships. We also seek to increase our most attractive deposit accounts, primarily by growing deposits in our community markets and cross selling our depository products to our loan customers.

As a result of these strategic and organic growth efforts, we have expanded our team of full-time equivalent employees from 19 to ~~623~~702 and our network of branches from two to ~~51.~~69. We believe that we are well positioned to continue to be a strategic consolidator of community banks while maintaining our history of attracting experienced and entrepreneurial bankers and organically growing our loans and deposits.

We believe we are a leading provider of commercial and personal banking services to businesses and business owners as well as individuals in our targeted Midwestern markets. Our strategy is to continue strategically consolidating community banks within such markets and maintaining our organic growth, while preserving our asset quality through disciplined lending practices.

We believe many of these banks will continue to be burdened by new and more complex banking regulations, resource constraints, competitive limitations, rising technological and other business costs, management succession issues and liquidity concerns.

Despite the significant number of opportunities, we intend to continue to employ a disciplined approach to our acquisition strategy and only seek to identify and partner with financial institutions that possess attractive market share, low-cost deposit funding and compelling noninterest income-generating businesses. We believe consolidation will lead to organic growth opportunities for us following the integration of businesses we acquire. We also expect to continue to manage our branch network in order to ensure effective coverage for customers while minimizing any geographic overlap and driving corporate efficiency.

	Deposits					Loans					Deposits					Loans
	Amount⁽¹⁾		Overall %			Amount⁽¹⁾		Overall %			Amount⁽¹⁾		Overall %			Amount⁽¹⁾		Overall %
Metropolitan markets⁽²⁾	$	1,073,897		31	%	$	1,559,629		60	%
Community markets⁽³⁾	$	2,373,693		69	%	$	1,032,067		40	%
Metropolitan markets⁽²⁾											$	1,441,634		33	%	$	1,953,142		62	%
Community markets⁽³⁾											$	2,978,369		67	%	$	1,202,485		38	%

⁽²⁾⁽²⁾Represents ~~12 branches located~~15 locations in the Wichita, Kansas City and Tulsa metropolitan statistical areas (“MSAs”).

⁽³⁾⁽³⁾Represents ~~39 branches located~~54 locations outside of the Wichita, Kansas City and Tulsa MSAs.

Our team of seasoned bankers represents an important driver of our organic growth by expanding banking relationships with current and potential customers. We expect to continue to make opportunistic hires of talented and entrepreneurial bankers, particularly in our metropolitan markets, to further augment our growth. Our bankers are incentivized to increase the size of their loan and deposit portfolios and generate fee income while maintaining strong credit quality. We also seek to cross-sell our various banking products, including our deposit and treasury wealth management products, to our commercial loan customers, which we believe provides a basis for expanding our banking relationships as well as a stable, low-cost deposit base. We have built a scalable platform that will support this continued organic growth.

We believe the following competitive strengths will allow us to continue to achieve our principal objective of increasing stockholder value and generating consistent earnings growth through the organic and strategic expansion of our commercial banking franchise.

At close of business on October 1, 2021, we completed our acquisition of ASBI pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated July 19, 2021, by and between the Company, Greyhound Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Greyhound Merger Sub”), and ASBI (the ASBI Merger Agreement”). At the effective time of the merger (the “ASBI Effective Time”), Greyhound Merger Sub merged with and into ASBI, with ASBI surviving the merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Following the ASBI Effective Time, ASBI merged with and into the Company, with the Company surviving the merger. Subsequently, American State Bank and Trust, ASBI’s wholly-owned banking subsidiary, merged into Equity Bank, with Equity Bank surviving the merger. Pursuant to the ASBI Merger Agreement, at the ASBI Effective Time the Company issued an aggregate of 2,485,983 shares of its Class A common stock and paid $8.4 million in cash to the stockholders of ASBI as consideration under the terms of the ASBI Merger Agreement.

On December 6, 2021, we completed our acquisition of three branch locations from Security Bank of Kansas City pursuant to a Branch Purchase and Assumption Agreement, dated July 19, 2021 (the Security Bank agreement), between Equity Bank and Security Bank of Kansas City. Pursuant to the Security Bank Agreement, Equity Bank assumed the deposits and certain other liabilities and acquired the loans and certain other assets associated with the three branch locations.

On October 23, 2020, we completed our purchase of two bank locations from Almena State Bank, facilitated by the FDIC. Pursuant to the purchase, Equity Bank assumed the deposits and acquired the loans and certain other assets associated with the two bank locations.

A general description of the range of commercial banking products and other services we offer follows.

We offer a variety of loans, including commercial and industrial, commercial real estate-backed loans (including loans secured by owner occupied commercial properties), commercial lines of credit, working capital loans, term loans, equipment financing, acquisition, expansion and development loans, borrowing base loans, real estate construction loans, homebuilder loans, agricultural, government guaranteed loans, letters of credit and other loan products to national and regional companies, restaurant franchisees, hoteliers, real estate developers, manufacturing and industrial companies, agribusiness companies and other businesses. We also offer various consumer loans to individuals and professionals including residential real estate loans, home equity loans, home equity lines of credit (“HELOCs”), installment loans, unsecured and secured personal lines of credit, overdraft protection and letters of credit. Lending activities originate from the relationships and efforts of our bankers, with an emphasis on providing banking solutions tailored to meet our customers’ needs while maintaining our underwriting standards.

At December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, we had total loans of ~~$2.56~~$3.11 billion (net of allowances), representing ~~63.7%~~60.5% of our total assets. For additional information concerning our loan portfolio, see “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financial Condition – Loan Portfolio.”

Concentrations of Credit Risk. Most of our lending activity is conducted with businesses and individuals in metropolitan Kansas City, Tulsa and Wichita. Our loan portfolio consists primarily of commercial real estate loans, which were ~~$1.19~~$1.49 billion and constituted ~~45.9%~~47.1% of our total loans as of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, commercial and industrial loans, which were ~~$734.5~~$567.5 million and constituted ~~28.3%~~18% of our total loans as of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, and residential real estate loans, which were ~~$382.0~~$638.1 million and constituted ~~14.7%~~20.2% of our total loans as of December 31, ~~2020.~~2021. Our commercial real estate loans are generally secured by first liens on real property. The remaining commercial and industrial loans are typically secured by general business assets, accounts receivable, inventory and/or the corporate guaranty of the borrower and/or personal guaranty of its principals. The geographic concentration subjects the loan portfolio to the general economic conditions within Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma. The risks created by such concentrations have been considered by management in the determination of the adequacy of the allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses. Management believes the allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses is adequate to cover incurred losses in our loan portfolio as of December 31, ~~2020.~~2021.

Sound risk management practices and appropriate levels of capital are essential elements of a sound commercial real estate lending program. Concentrations of commercial real estate exposures add a dimension of risk that compounds the risk inherent in individual loans. Interagency guidance on commercial real estate concentrations describe sound risk management practices which include board and management oversight, portfolio management, management information systems, market analysis, portfolio stress testing and sensitivity analysis, credit underwriting standards and credit risk review functions. Management believes these practices allow us to appropriately monitor concentrations in commercial real estate in our loan portfolio.

Large Credit Relationships. As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the aggregate amount of loans to our ten largest borrowers (including related entities) amounted to approximately ~~$241.3~~$306.2 million, or ~~9.3%~~9.7% of total loans. See “Item 1A – Risk Factors – Risks Related to Our Business – Our largest loan relationships currently make up a material percentage of our total loan portfolio.”

Loan Underwriting and Approval. Historically, we believe we have made sound, high quality loans while recognizing that lending money involves a degree of business risk. We have loan policies designed to assist us in managing this business risk. These policies provide a general framework for our loan origination, monitoring and funding activities, while recognizing that not all risks can be anticipated. Our board of directors delegates loan authority up to board-approved hold limits collectively to our Directors’ credit committee, which is comprised of members of our board of directors. Our board of directors also delegates limited lending authority to our internal loan committee, which is comprised of members of our executive management team. In addition, our board of directors also delegates more limited lending authority to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Credit Officer, credit risk

personnel and, on a further limited basis, to selected lending managers in each of our target markets. Lending officers and relationship managers, including our bankers, have further limited individual loan authority. When the total relationship exceeds an individual’s loan authority, a higher authority or credit committee approval is required. The objective of our approval process is to provide a disciplined, collaborative approach to larger credits while maintaining responsiveness to client needs.

Loan decisions are documented as to the borrower’s business, purpose of the loan, evaluation of the repayment source and associated risks, evaluation of collateral, covenants and monitoring requirements and the risk rating rationale. Our strategy for approving or disapproving loans is to follow conservative loan policies and consistent underwriting practices which include:

Managing credit risk is a Company-wide process. Our strategy for credit risk management includes well-defined, centralized credit policies, uniform underwriting criteria and ongoing risk monitoring and review processes for all credit exposures. Our processes emphasize early-stage review of loans, regular credit evaluations and management reviews of loans, which supplement the ongoing and proactive credit monitoring and loan servicing provided by our bankers. Our Chief Credit Officer provides Company-wide credit oversight and periodically reviews all credit risk portfolios to ensure that the risk identification processes are functioning properly and that our credit standards are followed. In addition, a third-party loan review is performed to assist in the identification of problem assets and to confirm our internal risk rating of loans. We attempt to identify potential problem loans early in an effort to seek aggressive resolution of these situations before the loans become a loss, record any necessary charge-offs promptly and maintain adequate allowance levels for probable ~~loan~~credit losses incurred in the loan portfolio.

Our loan policies generally include other underwriting guidelines for loans collateralized by real estate. These underwriting standards are designed to determine the maximum loan amount that a borrower has the capacity to repay based upon the type of collateral securing the loan and the borrower’s income. Such loan policies include maximum amortization schedules and loan terms for each category of loans collateralized by liens on real estate.

In addition, our loan policies provide guidelines for personal guarantees; an environmental review; loans to employees, executive officers and directors; problem loan identification; maintenance of an adequate allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses and other matters relating to lending practices.

Lending Limits. Our lending activities are subject to a variety of lending limits imposed by federal and state law. In general, the Bank is subject to a legal lending limit on loans to a single borrower based on the Bank’s capital level. The dollar amounts of the Bank’s lending limit increases or decreases as the Bank’s capital increases or decreases. The Bank is able to sell participations in its larger loans to other financial institutions, which allows it to manage the risk involved in these loans and to meet the lending needs of its customers requiring extensions of credit in excess of these limits.

The Bank’s legal lending limit as of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, on loans to a single borrower was ~~$104.7~~$136.6 million. However, we typically maintain an in-house limit of $25.0 million for loans to a single borrower. We have strict policies and procedures in place for the establishment of hold limits with respect to specific products and businesses and evaluating exceptions to the hold limits for individual relationships.

Our loan policies provide general guidelines for loan-to-value ratios that restrict the size of loans to a maximum percentage of the value of the collateral securing the loans, which percentage varies by the type of collateral. Our internal loan-to-value limitations follow limits established by applicable law.

Loan Types. We provide a variety of loans to meet our customers’ needs. The section below discusses our general loan categories.

Commercial and Industrial Loans. We make commercial and industrial loans, including commercial lines of credit, working capital loans, term loans, equipment financing, aircraft financing, acquisition, expansion and development loans, borrowing base loans, government guaranteed loans, letters of credit and other loan products, primarily in our target markets that are underwritten on the basis of the borrower’s ability to service the debt from income. We take as collateral a lien on general business assets including, among other things, available real estate, accounts receivable, inventory and equipment and generally obtain a personal guaranty of

the borrower or principal. Our commercial and industrial loans generally have variable interest rates and terms that typically range from one to five years depending on factors such as the type and size of the loan, the financial strength of the borrower/guarantor and the age, type and value of the collateral. Fixed rate commercial and industrial loan maturities are generally short-term, with three to five-year maturities, or include periodic interest rate resets. Terms greater than five years may be appropriate in some circumstances based upon the useful life of the underlying asset being financed or if some form of credit enhancement, such as a government guarantee is obtained.

We also participate in syndicated loans (loans made by a group of lenders, including us, who share or participate in a specific loan) with a larger regional financial institution as the lead lender. Syndicated loans are typically made to large businesses (which are referred to as shared national credits) or middle market companies (which do not meet the regulatory definition of shared national credits), both of which are secured by business assets or equipment, and also commercial real estate. The syndicate group for both types of loans usually consists of two to three other financial institutions. In particular, we frequently work with a large regional financial institution, which is often the lead lender with respect to these loans. We have developed this portfolio to diversify our balance sheet, increase our yield and mitigate interest rate risk due to the variable rate pricing structure of the loans. We have a defined set of credit guidelines that we use when evaluating these credits. Although other large financial institutions are the lead lenders on these loans, our credit department does its own independent review of these loans and the approval process of these loans is consistent with our underwriting of loans and our lending policies. We expect to continue our syndicated lending program for the foreseeable future.

In general, commercial and industrial loans may involve increased credit risk and, therefore, typically yield a higher return. The increased risk in commercial and industrial loans derives from the expectation that such loans generally are serviced principally from the operations of the business and those operations may not be successful. Any interruption or discontinuance of operating cash flows from the business, which may be influenced by events not under the control of the borrower such as economic events and changes in governmental regulations, could materially affect the ability of the borrower to repay the loan. In addition, the collateral securing commercial and industrial loans generally includes moveable property such as equipment and inventory, which may decline in value more rapidly than we anticipate exposing us to increased credit risk. As a result of these additional complexities, variables and risks, commercial and industrial loans require extensive underwriting and servicing.

Commercial Real Estate Loans. We make commercial mortgage loans collateralized by real estate, which may be owner occupied or non-owner-occupied real estate. Commercial real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment is dependent, in large part, on sufficient income from the properties securing the loans to cover operating expenses and debt service. We require our commercial real estate loans to be secured by well-managed property with adequate margins and generally obtain a guarantee from responsible parties. Our commercial mortgage loans generally are collateralized by first liens on real estate, have variable or fixed interest rates and amortize over a 10 to 20-year period with balloon payments or rate adjustments due at the end of three to seven years. Periodically, we will utilize an interest rate swap to hedge against long term fixed rate exposures. Commercial mortgage loans considered for interest rate swap hedging typically have terms of greater than five years.

Payments on loans secured by such properties are often dependent on the successful operation (in the case of owner-occupied real estate) or management (in the case of non-owner-occupied real estate) of the properties. Accordingly, repayment of these loans may be subject to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy to a greater extent than other types of loans. In underwriting commercial real estate loans, we seek to minimize these risks in a variety of ways, including giving careful consideration to the property’s age, condition, operating history, future operating projections, current and projected market rental rates, vacancy rates, location and physical condition. The underwriting analysis also may include credit verification, reviews of appraisals, environmental hazards or reports, the borrower’s liquidity and leverage, management experience of the owners or principals, economic condition and industry trends.

~~Real Estate Construction Loans~~. We also make loans to finance the construction of residential and non-residential properties. Construction loans generally are collateralized by first liens on real estate and have floating interest rates. We conduct periodic inspections, either directly or through an agent, prior to approval of periodic draws on these loans. Underwriting guidelines similar to those described above are also used in our construction lending activities. Our construction loans have terms that typically range from six months to two years depending on factors such as the type and size of the development and the financial strength of the borrower/guarantor. Loans are typically structured with an interest only construction period. Loans are underwritten to either mature at the completion of construction, or transition to a traditional amortizing commercial real estate facility at the completion of construction, in line with other commercial real estate loans held at the bank.

Construction loans generally involve additional risks attributable to the fact that loan funds are advanced upon the security of a project under construction, and the project is of uncertain value prior to its completion. Because of uncertainties inherent in estimating construction costs, the market value of the completed project and the effects of governmental regulation on real property, it can be difficult to accurately evaluate the total funds required to complete a project and the related loan-to-value ratio. As a result of these uncertainties, construction lending often involves the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment dependent, in part, on the

success of the ultimate project rather than the ability of a borrower or guarantor to repay the loan. If we are forced to foreclose on a project prior to completion, there is no assurance that we will be able to recover the entire unpaid portion of the loan. In addition, we may be required to fund additional amounts to complete a project and it may be necessary to hold the property for an indeterminate period of time subject to the regulatory limitations imposed by local, state or federal laws.

1 – 4 Family Residential Mortgages. We make residential real estate loans collateralized by owner-occupied properties located in our market areas. We offer a variety of mortgage loan products with amortization periods up to 30 years including traditional 30-year fixed loans and various adjustable rate mortgages. Typically, loans with a fixed interest rate of greater than 10 years are held for sale and sold on the secondary market and adjustable rate mortgages are held for investment. Loans collateralized by one-to-four family residential real estate generally are originated in amounts of no more than 80% of appraised value. Home equity loans and HELOCs are generally limited to a combined loan-to-value ratio of 80%, including the subordinate lien. We retain a valid lien on real estate, obtain a title insurance policy that ~~insures~~ensures that the property is free from encumbrances and require hazard insurance.

From time to time we have purchased pools of residential mortgages originated by other financial institutions to hold for investment with the intent to diversify our residential mortgage loan portfolio and increase our yield. These loans purchased typically have an adjustable rate with a fixed period of no more than 10 years and are collateralized by one-to-four family residential real estate. We have a defined set of credit guidelines that we use when evaluating these credits. Although these loans were originated and underwritten by another institution, our mortgage and credit departments do their own independent review of these loans. These loans typically are secured by collateral outside of our branch footprint.

Agricultural Loans. We offer both fixed-rate and adjustable-rate agricultural real estate loans to our customers. We also make loans to finance the purchase of machinery, equipment and breeding stock, seasonal crop operating loans used to fund the borrower’s crop production operating expenses, livestock operating, and revolving loans used to purchase livestock for resale and related livestock production expense.

Generally, our agricultural real estate loans amortize over periods not in excess of 20 years and have a loan-to-value ratio of 80%. We also originate agricultural real estate loans directly and through programs sponsored by the Farm Service Agency (“FSA”), an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture, which provides a partial guarantee on loans underwritten to FSA standards. Agricultural real estate loans generally carry higher interest rates and have shorter terms than 1-4 family residential real estate loans. Agricultural real estate loans, however, entail additional credit risks compared to one- to four-family residential real estate loans, as they typically involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. We generally require farmers to obtain multi-peril crop insurance coverage through a program partially subsidized by the Federal government to help mitigate the risk of crop failures.

Agricultural operating loans may be originated at an adjustable or fixed rate of interest and generally for a term of up to 7 years. In the case of agricultural operating loans secured by breeding livestock and/or farm equipment, such loans are originated at fixed rates of interest for a term of up to 5 years. We typically originate agricultural operating loans based on the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the borrower’s agricultural business. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of agricultural operating loans may be substantially dependent on the success of the business itself and the general economic environment. A significant number of agricultural borrowers with these types of loans may qualify for relief under a chapter of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code that is designed specifically for the reorganization of financial obligations of family farmers and which provides certain preferential procedures to agricultural borrowers compared to traditional bankruptcy proceedings pursuant to other chapters of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

Consumer Loans. We make a variety of loans to individuals for personal and household purposes, including secured and unsecured term loans and home improvement loans. Consumer loans are underwritten based on the individual borrower’s income, current debt level, past credit history and the value of any available collateral. The terms of consumer loans vary considerably based upon the loan type, nature of collateral and size of the loan. Consumer loans entail greater risk than do residential real estate loans because they may be unsecured or, if secured, the value of the collateral, such as an automobile or boat, may be more difficult to assess and more likely to decrease in value than real estate. In such cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment for the outstanding loan balance. The remaining deficiency often will not warrant further substantial collection efforts against the borrower beyond obtaining a deficiency judgment. In addition, consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws may limit the amount which can be recovered on such loans.

Our lending and investing activities are primarily funded by deposits. We offer a variety of deposit accounts with a wide range of interest rates and terms including demand, savings, money market and time deposits with the goal of attracting a wide variety of customers, including small to medium-sized businesses. We employ customer acquisition strategies to generate new account and deposit growth, such as customer referral incentives, search engine optimization, targeted direct mail and email campaigns, in addition

to conventional marketing initiatives and advertising. Our goal is to emphasize our core deposits and cross-sell our deposit products to our loan customers.

We design our consumer deposit products specifically for the lifestyles of clients in the communities we serve. Some accounts emphasize and reward debit card usage, while others appeal to higher deposit customers. We also utilize Equity Connect, which is our customer relationship management system, to assist our personnel in deepening and expanding current relationships by providing timely identification of potential needs. It also serves as a methodical tool to track customer onboarding and retention actions by account officers. We do participate in the Certificate of Deposit Registry Services (“CDARS”) via Promontory Interfinancial Network as an option for our customers to place funds and occasionally as a funding source.

We offer banking products and services that are competitively priced with a focus on convenience and accessibility. We offer a full suite of online banking solutions including access to account balances, online transfers, online bill payment and electronic delivery of customer statements, mobile banking solutions for iPhone and Android phones, including remote check deposit with mobile bill pay. We offer extended drive-through hours, ATMs and banking by telephone, mail and personal appointment. We offer debit cards with no ATM surcharges or foreign ATM fees for checking customers, plus night depository, direct deposit, cashier’s and travelers checks and letters of credit, as well as treasury management services, wire transfer services and automated clearing house (“ACH”) services.

We offer a full array of commercial treasury management services designed to be competitive with banks of all sizes. Treasury management services include balance reporting (including current day and previous day activity), transfers between accounts, wire transfer initiation, ACH origination and stop payments. Cash management deposit products consist of lockbox, remote deposit capture, positive pay, reverse positive pay, account reconciliation services, zero balance accounts and sweep accounts, including loan sweep.

In addition, we offer a full comprehensive suite of products and offerings for trust and wealth management customers. Trust and wealth management services include private banking, investment management, trust services and estate and financial planning.

As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, we conducted banking operations through our ~~51 branches located~~69 bank locations in Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma. We believe that an important factor contributing to our historical performance and our ability to execute our strategy is the attractiveness and specific characteristics of our existing and target markets. In particular, we believe our markets provide us with access to low cost, stable core deposits in smaller community markets that we can use to fund commercial loan growth in metropolitan areas.

We believe our existing and target markets are among some of the most attractive in the Midwestern United States. Our markets are home to thousands of manufacturing and trade jobs, and have experienced recent growth in the healthcare, consumer services and technology sectors. We believe the central geographic footprint of our markets provides numerous industrial plants, facilities and manufacturing businesses with a central shipping location from which they can distribute their products. Our markets also serve as the corporate headquarters for Koch Industries Inc., Hallmark Cards, Inc., H&R Block, Inc., ~~Sprint Corporation, Cerner Corporation,~~ American Century Investments, Garmin International, Inc., Cessna Aircraft Company, Seaboard Corporation, Cargill Meat Solutions, Spirit AeroSystems, Dairy Farmers of America, Quick Trip, ONEOK, and Williams Companies and host a major presence for companies across a variety of industries, including Bombardier Learjet, Collective Brands, Inc., FedEx, Flexsteel, Hills Pet Nutrition, Inc., Textron Aviation Services, Tyson Foods, Phillips 66, Rib Crib, Honeywell, T-Mobile, Oracle,and Bayer Corporation. We understand the community banking needs of the businesses and individuals within our markets, and have focused on developing a commercial and personal banking platform to service such needs.

The markets in which we operate have generally experienced stable population growth over the past five years, with modest population growth expected over the next five years. Wichita is the largest metropolitan statistical authority (“MSA”) located fully in Kansas and the No. 94 MSA in the U.S. with a population of over ~~640,000.~~650,000. Kansas City, Missouri and Kansas is the No. 31 largest MSA in the U.S. with a population of 2.2 million, and Tulsa, Oklahoma, is No. 5155 with a MSA population of ~~nearly~~over 1 million.

In addition, we believe our markets are stable and have weathered various economic cycles relatively well. Household income in our states is expected to increase from ~~2021~~2022 through ~~2026~~2027 by ~~5.71%~~9.22%, while population growth grew by 4.12% from 2010 through 2021 and is expected ~~largely~~ to ~~hold~~grow by 4.12% from ~~2021~~2022 through ~~2026.~~2027. In Kansas City, households are expected to grow from 2022 to 2027 by ~~3.5%~~1.38%, Tulsa by ~~3.25%~~2.44% and Wichita by ~~1.5%~~2.48%, according to Claritas data provided by S&P Global.

We compete for loans, deposits and financial services in our markets against many other bank and nonbank institutions, including community banks, regional banks, national banks, Internet-based banks, money market and mutual funds, brokerage houses, credit unions, mortgage companies and insurance companies. We believe that our comprehensive suite of sophisticated banking products provides us with a competitive advantage over smaller community banks within our markets while our high-quality, relationship-based customer service will allow us to take market share from larger regional and national banks. In addition, our markets present significant acquisition, integration and consolidation opportunities, and we expect to continue to pursue strategic acquisitions in our markets. We believe that many small to mid-sized banking organizations that currently serve our markets are acquisition opportunities for us, either because of scale and operational challenges, regulatory pressures, management succession issues or stockholder liquidity needs. We think we offer an attractive solution for such banks because we retain the community banking feel and services upon which their customers expect and rely.

We continue to make significant investments in our information technology systems and staff for our banking and lending operations and treasury management activities. We believe this investment will support our continued growth, permit us to enhance our capabilities to offer new products and overall customer experience and enable us to provide scale for future growth and acquisitions. We use nationally recognized software vendors and their support allows us to operate our data processing and core systems in-house. Our internal network and e-mail systems are maintained in-house and we have enhanced our back-up site at a decentralized location. This back-up site provides for redundancy and disaster recovery capabilities.

The majority of our other systems, including our electronic funds transfer, transaction processing and online banking services are hosted by third-party service providers. The scalability of this infrastructure will support our growth strategy. In addition, the tested capability of these vendors to automatically switch over to standby systems should allow us to recover our systems and provide business continuity quickly in case of a disaster.

Due to our heavy reliance on the strength and capability of our technology systems, which we use both to interface with our customers and to manage our internal financial reporting and other systems, we utilize a layered cyber security model designed to protect all systems and sensitive data. This layered model is composed of a variety of different components from a range of security vendors. The various components are centrally managed and monitored creating a multi-layered, interlocking, cybersecurity defense system. We believe this defense system is dynamic and designed to adjust to protect against the latest cyber threats and attack ~~vectors.~~vectors; however, as cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities or incidents. We use information technology in our operations and offer online banking services to our customers, and unauthorized access to our customers’ confidential or proprietary information as a result of a cyber-attack or otherwise could expose us to reputational harm and litigation and adversely affect our ability to attract and retain customers.

For a discussion of certain cyber security risk, please see “Item 1A – Risk Factors”.

The financial services industry is highly competitive. We compete for loans, deposits, and financial services in all of our principal markets. We compete directly with other bank and nonbank institutions located within our markets, Internet-based banks, out-of-market banks, and bank holding companies that advertise in or otherwise serve our markets, along with money market and mutual funds, brokerage houses, mortgage companies, and insurance companies or other commercial entities that offer financial services products. Competition involves efforts to retain current customers, obtain new loans and deposits, increase the scope and type of services offered and offer competitive interest rates paid on deposits and charged on loans. Many of our competitors enjoy competitive advantages, including greater financial resources, a wider geographic presence, more accessible branch office locations, the ability to offer additional services, more favorable pricing alternatives and lower origination and operating costs. Some of our competitors have been in business for a long time and have an established customer base and name recognition. We believe that our

competitive pricing, personalized service and community involvement enable us to effectively compete in the communities in which we operate.

The Company’s success depends on its ability to attract and retain highly qualified senior and middle management and other skilled employees. Competition for qualified employees can be intense and it may be difficult to locate personnel with the necessary combination of skills, attributes and business relationships.

The Company believes that its employees are the primary key to the Company’s success as a financial institution. The Company is committed to attracting, retaining and promoting top quality talent regardless of sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, race, color, national origin, age, religion and physical ability. The Company strives to identify and select the best candidates for all open positions based on qualifying factors for each job. The Company is dedicated to providing a workplace for its employees that is inclusive, supportive and free of any form of discrimination or harassment; rewarding and recognizing its employees based on their individual results and performance; and recognizing and respecting all of the characteristics and differences that make each of the Company’s employees unique.

Additionally, the Company is committed to employee development through a combination of in-house and external training programs. Further, the Company has two staff development programs with formal in-house training programs for junior bankers including guidance from senior banking team members.

As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the Company employed ~~623~~702 full-time equivalent employees. None of our employees are represented by any collective bargaining unit or is a party to a collective bargaining agreement.

The Company files reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Company makes available, free of charge, on its website at http://investor.equitybank.com its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files, or furnishes, such materials to the SEC. The SEC also maintains a website at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The information contained on or accessible from our website does not constitute a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is not incorporated by reference herein.

Banking is a complex, highly regulated industry. Consequently, our growth and earnings performance can be affected, not only by management decisions and general and local economic conditions, but also by the statutes administered by and the regulations and policies of, various governmental regulatory authorities. These authorities include, but are not limited to, the Federal Reserve, the FDIC, ~~the OCC,~~ the Kansas Office of State Bank Commissioner (“OSBC”), the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and state taxing authorities. The effect of these statutes, regulations and policies and any changes to any of them can be significant and cannot be predicted.

The primary goals of the bank regulatory scheme are to maintain a safe and sound banking system and to facilitate the conduct of sound monetary policy. In furtherance of those goals, the U.S. Congress and the individual states have created several regulatory agencies and enacted numerous laws, such as the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), that govern banks and the banking industry. The system of supervision and regulation applicable to us establishes a comprehensive framework for our operations and is intended primarily for the protection of the FDIC’s deposit insurance funds, our depositors and the public, rather than the stockholders and creditors.

New regulations and statutes are regularly proposed that contain wide-ranging proposals for altering the structures, regulations and competitive relationships of financial institutions operating in the United States. We cannot predict whether or in what form any proposed regulation or statute will be adopted or the extent to which our businesses may be affected by any new regulation or statute.

The following is an attempt to summarize some of the relevant laws, rules and regulations governing banks and bank holding companies, but does not purport to be a complete summary of all applicable laws, rules and regulations governing banks. The descriptions are qualified in their entirety by reference to the specific statutes and regulations discussed.

The laws, rules and regulations add significantly to the cost of operating the Company and Equity Bank and thus have a negative impact on profitability. In recent years, financial service providers that are not subject to the same regulations as the Company and Equity Bank have expanded significantly. Less regulation may give these institutions a competitive advantage over the Company and

Equity Bank. Such institutions may continue to draw large amounts of funds away from banking institutions, with a continuing adverse effect on the banking industry in general.

We are a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (“BHC Act”), as amended, and are subject to supervision and regulation by the Federal Reserve. Federal laws subject bank holding companies to particular restrictions on the types of activities in which they may engage and to a range of supervisory requirements and activities, including regulatory enforcement actions, for violation of laws and policies.

The BHC Act prohibits a bank holding company, with certain limited exceptions, from acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than five percent of the voting shares of any company that is not a bank or from engaging in any activities other than those of banking, managing or controlling banks and certain other subsidiaries or furnishing services to or performing services for its subsidiaries. Bank holding companies also may engage in or acquire interests in companies that engage in a limited set of activities that are so closely related to banking as to be a proper incident thereto. If a bank holding company has become a financial holding company (“FHC”), it may engage in a broader set of activities, including insurance underwriting and broker-dealer services as well as activities that are jointly determined by the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury to be financial in nature or incidental to such financial activity. FHCs may also engage in activities that are determined by the Federal Reserve to be complementary to financial activities. To maintain FHC status, the bank holding company and all subsidiary depository institutions must be “well managed” and “well capitalized.” Additionally, all subsidiary depository institutions must have received at least a “Satisfactory” rating on its most recent Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) examination. Failure to meet these requirements may result in limitations on activities and acquisitions. We have not elected to be an FHC at this time.

Bank holding companies are not permitted to engage in unsafe and unsound banking practices. The Federal Reserve may order a bank holding company to terminate an activity or control of a non-bank subsidiary if such activity or control constitutes a significant risk to the financial safety, soundness or stability of a subsidiary bank and is inconsistent with sound banking principles. Regulation Y also requires a holding company to give the Federal Reserve prior notice of any redemption or repurchase of its own equity securities if the consideration to be paid, together with the consideration paid for any repurchases or redemptions in the preceding year, is equal to 10% or more of the company’s consolidated net worth.

Consistent with the Dodd-Frank Act codification of the Federal Reserve’s policy that bank holding companies must serve as a source of financial strength for their subsidiary banks, the Federal Reserve has stated that, as a matter of prudence, a bank holding company generally should not maintain a rate of distributions to stockholders unless its available net income has been sufficient to fully fund the distributions and the prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with a bank holding company’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition.

In addition, the Federal Reserve Supervisory Letter SR 09-4 provides guidance on the declaration and payment of dividends, capital redemptions and capital repurchases by a bank holding company. Supervisory Letter SR 09-4 provides that, as a general matter, a bank holding company should eliminate, defer or significantly reduce its dividends if: (i) the bank holding company’s net income available to stockholders for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid during that period, is not sufficient to fully fund the dividends, (ii) the bank holding company’s prospective rate of earnings retention is not consistent with the bank holding company’s capital needs and overall current and prospective financial condition or (iii) the bank holding company will not meet, or is in danger of not meeting, its minimum regulatory capital adequacy ratios. Failure to do so could result in a supervisory finding that the bank holding company is operating in an unsafe and unsound manner.

Limitations on Equity Bank’s ability to pay dividends could, in turn, affect our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders. For more information concerning Equity Bank’s ability to pay dividends, see “Bank Regulation” below.

The Federal Reserve has broad authority to prohibit activities of bank holding companies and their non-banking subsidiaries which represent unsafe and unsound banking practices, or which constitute violations of laws or regulations. Notably, the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”), provides that the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve can assess civil money penalties for such practices or violations which can be as high as $1 million per day. FIRREA contains expansive provisions regarding the scope of individuals and entities against which such penalties may be assessed.

We are required to file annual and quarterly reports with the Federal Reserve and such additional information as the Federal Reserve may require pursuant to the BHC Act. The Federal Reserve may examine a bank holding company or any of its subsidiaries and charge the company for the cost of such an examination. We are also subject to reporting and disclosure requirements under state and federal securities laws.

~~Regulatory capital rules released in July 2013 pursuant~~Pursuant to the Basel III requirements (“Basel III rules”), implemented higher minimum capital requirements for bank holding companies and banks. The Basel III rules included a common equity Tier 1 capital requirement and established criteria that instruments must meet to be considered common equity Tier 1 capital, additional Tier 1 capital or Tier 2 capital. These enhancements were designed to both improve the quality and increase the quantity of capital required to be held by banking organizations, better equipping the U.S. banking system to deal with adverse economic conditions. The Basel III rules require banks and bank holding companies to maintain a minimum common equity Tier 1 (“CET1”) risk-based capital ratio of 4.5%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6%, a total risk-based capital ratio of 8% and a leverage ratio of 4%. Under the Basel III rules, banks and bank holding companies must maintain a CET1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.5%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8%, a total risk-based capital ratio of 10% and a leverage ratio of 5% to be deemed “well capitalized” for purposes of certain rules and requirements. Banks and bank holding companies are also required to maintain a “capital conservation buffer” in excess of the minimum risk-based capital ratios. The buffer is intended to help ensure that banking organizations conserve capital when it is most needed, allowing them to better weather periods of economic stress. The minimum 2.5% buffer is composed solely of CET1 capital. If an institution’s capital conservation buffer is less than or equal to 2.5%, then the institution is subject to limitations on certain activities, including payment of dividends, share repurchases and discretionary bonuses to executive officers.

The Basel III rules also attempted to improve the quality of capital by implementing changes to the definition of capital. Among the most important changes are stricter eligibility criteria for regulatory capital instruments that disallow the inclusion of certain instruments, such as trust preferred securities, in Tier 1 capital going forward and new constraints on the inclusion of minority interests, mortgage-servicing assets, deferred tax assets and certain investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial institutions. In addition, the Basel III rules require that most regulatory capital deductions be made from CET1 capital.

The federal bank regulatory agencies may also set higher capital requirements for banks and bank holding companies whose circumstances warrant it. For example, holding companies experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions are expected to maintain strong capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory levels, without significant reliance on intangible assets. At this time, the bank regulatory agencies are more inclined to impose higher capital requirements to meet well capitalized standards and future regulatory change could impose higher capital standards as a routine matter. Our regulatory capital ratios and those of Equity Bank are in excess of the levels established for well capitalized institutions under the Basel III rules.

The Basel III rules also set forth certain changes in the methods of calculating certain risk-weighted assets, which in turn affect the calculation of risk-based capital ratios. Under the Basel III rules, higher or more sensitive risk weights are assigned to various categories of assets, including certain credit facilities that finance the acquisition, development or construction of real property, certain exposures or credits that are 90 days past due or on non-accrual, foreign exposures and certain corporate exposures. In addition, the Basel III rules include (i) alternative standards of credit worthiness consistent with the Dodd-Frank Act, (ii) greater recognition of collateral and guarantees and (iii) revised capital treatment for derivatives and repo-style transactions.

In addition, the Basel III rules include certain exemptions to address concerns about the regulatory burden on community banks. For example, banking organizations with less than $15 billion in consolidated assets as of December 31, 2009, are permitted to include in Tier 1 capital trust preferred securities and cumulative perpetual preferred stock issued and included in Tier 1 capital prior to May 19, 2010, on a permanent basis without phase out. Community banks were also permitted to make a one-time election in their March 31, 2015, quarterly filings to opt-out of the requirement to include most accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) components in the calculation of CET1 capital and, in effect, retain the AOCI treatment under the prior capital rules. Under the Basel III rules, we made the one-time, permanent election to continue to exclude AOCI from capital.

In accordance with the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act, which was enacted on May 24, 2018, the federal banking agencies published final rules implementing the community bank leverage ratio in November 2019. Under the final rules, which went into effect on January 1, 2020, depository institutions and depository institution holding companies that have less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets and meet other qualifying criteria, including a leverage ratio of greater than 9%, off-balance-sheet exposures of 25% or less of total consolidated assets and trading assets plus trading liabilities of 5% or less of total consolidated assets, are deemed “qualifying community banking organizations” and are eligible to opt into the community bank leverage ratio framework. A qualifying community banking organization that elects to use the community bank leverage ratio framework and that maintains a leverage ratio of greater than 9% is considered to have satisfied the generally applicable risk-based and leverage capital requirements under the Basel III rules and, if applicable, is considered to have met the “well capitalized” ratio requirements for purposes of its primary federal regulator’s prompt corrective action rules, discussed below. The final rules include a two-quarter grace period during which a qualifying community banking organization that temporarily fails to meet any of the qualifying criteria, including the greater-than-9% leverage ratio requirement, is generally still deemed “well capitalized” so long as the banking organization maintains a leverage ratio greater than 8%. A banking organization that fails to maintain a leverage ratio greater than 8% is not permitted to use the grace period and must comply with the generally applicable requirements under the Basel III Capital rules and file the appropriate regulatory reports. The Company and Equity Bank have not made an election to use the community bank leverage ratio framework but may make such an election in the future if eligible and doing so is advantageous.

On February 14, 2019, the federal bank regulatory agencies issued a final rule that allowed banking organizations to phase in over a three-year period the day-one adverse effects of the Current Expected Credit Losses methodology (CECL). Prior to the Company’s

initial required adoption date of CECL, on March 31, 2020, as part of the efforts to address the economic disruption caused by the spread of COVID-19, federal bank regulatory agencies issued an interim final rule which allowed the option to delay for up to two years an estimate of CECL’s effect on regulatory capital followed by a three-year transitions period. The Company implemented CECL on January 1, 2021, and has elected not to use the phase in methodology.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”) required each federal banking agency to revise its risk-based capital standards to ensure that those standards take adequate account of interest rate risk, concentration of credit risk and the risks of nontraditional activities, as well as reflect the actual performance and expected risk of loss on multifamily mortgages.

Pursuant to FDICIA, each federal banking agency has specified, by regulation, the levels at which an insured institution would be considered well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized. As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, Equity Bank exceeded the capital levels required to be deemed well capitalized.

Additionally, FDICIA requires bank regulators to take prompt corrective action to resolve problems associated with insured depository institutions. Under these prompt corrective action provisions of FDICIA, if a controlled bank is undercapitalized, then the regulators could require the bank to submit a capital restoration plan. If an institution becomes significantly undercapitalized or critically undercapitalized, additional and significant limitations are placed on the institution. The capital restoration plan of an undercapitalized institution will not be accepted by the regulators unless each company having control of the undercapitalized institution guarantees the subsidiary’s compliance with the capital restoration plan, until it becomes adequately capitalized. We have control of Equity Bank for the purpose of this statute.

Further, by statute and regulation, a bank holding company must serve as a source of financial and managerial strength to each bank that it controls and, under appropriate circumstances, may be required to commit resources to support each such controlled bank. This support may be required at times when the bank holding company may not have the resources to provide the support. In addition, if the Federal Reserve believes that a bank holding company’s activities, assets or affiliates represent a significant risk to the financial safety, soundness or stability of a controlled bank, then the Federal Reserve could require the bank holding company to terminate the activities, liquidate the assets or divest the affiliates. The regulators may require these and other actions in support of controlled banks even if such actions are not in the best interests of the bank holding company or its stockholders.

The BHC Act requires every bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before it may acquire all or substantially all of the assets of any bank or ownership or control of any voting shares of any bank if after such acquisition it would own or control, directly or indirectly, more than 5% of the voting shares of such bank. In approving bank acquisitions by bank holding companies, the Federal Reserve is required to consider the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the bank holding company and banks concerned, the convenience and needs of the communities to be served, the effect on competition as well as the financial stability of the United States. The Attorney General of the United States may, within 30 days after approval of an acquisition by the Federal Reserve, bring an action challenging such acquisition under the federal antitrust laws, in which case the effectiveness of such approval is stayed pending a final ruling by the courts. Under certain circumstances, the 30-day period may be shortened to 15 days.

The Change in Bank Control Act (“CBCA”) prohibits a person or group of persons from acquiring “control” of a bank holding company unless the Federal Reserve has been notified and has not objected to the transaction. Under a rebuttable presumption established by the Federal Reserve, the acquisition of 10% or more of a class of voting stock of a bank holding company with a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, such as ourselves, would, under the circumstances set forth in the presumption, constitute acquisition of control of us.

In addition, the BHC Act prohibits any entity from acquiring 25%, or more (the BHC Act has a lower limit for acquirers that are existing bank holding companies), of a bank holding company’s or bank’s voting securities, or otherwise obtaining control or the power to exercise a “controlling influence” over a bank holding company or bank, without the prior approval of the Federal Reserve. On January 30, 2020, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System adopted a final rule revising the Federal Reserve’s regulations related to determinations of whether a company has the ability to exercise a controlling influence over another company, including a bank holding company or a bank, for purposes of the BHC Act. The final rule establishes a comprehensive framework that employs several factors to determine if a company has control over another company, including the first company’s total voting and non-voting equity investment in the second company; director, officer and employee overlaps between the first company and the second company; and the scope of business relationships between the first company and the second company. The final rule went into effect on April 1, 2020.

The Dodd-Frank Act permits a national or state bank, with the approval of its regulator, to open a branch in any state if the law of the state in which the branch is located would permit the establishment of the branch if the bank were a bank chartered in that state.

Bank holding companies and their affiliates are prohibited from tying the provision of certain services, such as extensions of credit, to other services offered by a holding company or its affiliates.

Equity Bank operates under a Kansas state bank charter and is subject to regulation by the OSBC and the Federal Reserve. The OSBC and the Federal Reserve regulate or monitor all areas of Equity Bank’s operations, including capital requirements, issuance of stock, declaration of dividends, interest rates, deposits, loans, investments, borrowings, record keeping, establishment of branches, acquisitions, mergers, information technology and employee responsibility and conduct. The OSBC places limitations on activities of Equity Bank, including the issuance of capital notes or debentures and the holding of real estate and personal property and requires Equity Bank to maintain a certain ratio of reserves against deposits. The OSBC requires Equity Bank to file a report annually, in addition to any periodic report requested.

The Federal Reserve and the OSBC regularly examine Equity Bank and its records. The FDIC may also periodically examine and evaluate insured banks.

As part of FDICIA’s efforts to promote the safety and soundness of depository institutions and their holding companies, appropriate federal banking regulators are required to have in place regulations specifying operational and management standards (addressing internal controls, loan documentation, credit underwriting and interest rate risk), asset quality and earnings. As discussed above, the Federal Reserve and the FDIC have extensive authority to police unsafe or unsound practices and violations of applicable laws and regulations by depository institutions and their holding companies. For example, the FDIC may terminate the deposit insurance of any institution that it determines has engaged in an unsafe or unsound practice. The agencies can also assess civil money penalties of up to $1 million per day, issue cease-and-desist or removal orders, seek injunctions and publicly disclose such actions.

The ability of Equity Bank, as a Kansas state bank, to pay dividends is restricted under the Kansas Banking Code. Pursuant to the Kansas Banking Code, a Kansas state bank may declare and pay a dividend out of undivided profits after deducting losses to the holders of record of the stock outstanding on the date the dividend is declared. However, prior to the declaration of any dividend, a Kansas state bank must transfer 25% of its net profits since the last preceding dividend to its surplus fund until the surplus fund is equal to its total capital stock. In addition, no dividend may be declared without the approval of the OSBC, if such dividend would reduce the surplus fund to an amount less than 30% of the resulting total capital of the bank.

Equity Bank is also subject to certain restrictions on the payment of dividends as a result of the requirement that it maintain an adequate level of capital in accordance with guidelines promulgated from time to time by the federal regulators.

The present and future dividend policy of Equity Bank is subject to the discretion of its boards of directors. In determining whether to pay dividends to us and, if paid, the amount of the dividends, the board of directors of Equity Bank considers many of the same factors discussed above. Equity Bank cannot guarantee that it will have the financial ability to pay dividends to us, or if dividends are paid, that they will be sufficient for us to make distributions to our stockholders. Equity Bank is not obligated to pay dividends.

A bank is subject to certain restrictions on extensions of credit to insiders of the bank or of any affiliate. Insiders include executive officers, directors, certain principal stockholders and their related interests. Extensions of credit include derivative transactions, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowing and lending transactions to the extent that such transactions cause a bank to have credit exposure to an insider. Any extension of credit to an insider must:

For loans above certain threshold amounts, board approval is required, and the interested insider may not be involved. In addition, a bank may purchase an asset from or sell an asset to an insider only if the transaction is on market terms and, if representing more than 10% of capital, is approved in advance by the majority of disinterested directors.

Additional and more stringent limits apply to a bank’s transactions with its own executive officers and certain directors. These limits do not apply to transactions with all directors or to insiders of the bank’s affiliates.

Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act imposes quantitative and qualitative limits on transactions between a bank and any affiliate and requires certain levels of collateral for any such loans. It also limits the amount of advances to third parties which are collateralized by the securities or obligations of a holding company. Section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act requires that certain transactions between Equity Bank and its affiliates must be on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with or involving other nonaffiliated companies. In the absence of such comparable transactions, any transaction between Equity Bank and its affiliates must be on terms and under circumstances, including credit standards, which in good faith would be offered to or would apply to nonaffiliated companies.

In addition to the capital rules applicable to both banks and bank holding companies discussed above, under the prompt corrective action regulations, the federal bank regulators are required and authorized to take supervisory actions against undercapitalized banks. For this purpose, a bank is placed in one of the following five categories based on the bank’s capital:

Federal banking regulators are required to take various mandatory supervisory actions and are authorized to take other discretionary actions with respect to institutions in the three undercapitalized categories. The severity of the action depends upon the capital category in which the institution is placed. The regulators have the discretion to downgrade a bank from one category to a lower category. Generally, subject to a narrow exception, banking regulators must appoint a receiver or conservator for an institution that is “critically undercapitalized.” An institution that is categorized as “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized,” or “critically undercapitalized” is required to submit an acceptable capital restoration plan to its appropriate federal banking agency.

Failure to meet capital guidelines could subject Equity Bank to a variety of enforcement remedies, including issuance of a capital directive, the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC, a prohibition on accepting brokered deposits and other restrictions on our business.

As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, Equity Bank exceeded the capital levels required to be deemed well capitalized.

The FDIC insures the deposits of federally insured banks up to prescribed statutory limits for each depositor, through the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) and safeguards the safety and soundness of the banking and thrift industries. The Dodd-Frank Act permanently raised the standard maximum deposit insurance amount to $250,000. The amount of FDIC assessments paid by each insured depository institution is based on its relative risk of default as measured by financial ratios and supervisory factors derived from a statistical model that estimates a bank’s probability of failure within three years.

In connection with the Dodd Frank Act’s requirement that insurance assessments be based on assets, the FDIC has redefined its deposit insurance premium assessment base to be an institution’s average consolidated total assets minus average tangible equity. The FDIC also has revised its deposit insurance assessment rate schedule in light of this change to the assessment base. The revised rate schedule and other revisions to the assessment rules became effective July 1, 2016.19

We are generally unable to control the amount of premiums that we are required to pay for FDIC insurance. At least semi-annually, the FDIC will update its loss and income projections for the DIF and, if needed, will increase or decrease assessment rates, following notice-and-comment rulemaking, if required. If there are additional bank or financial institution failures or if the FDIC otherwise determines to increase assessment rates, Equity Bank may be required to pay higher FDIC insurance premiums. Any future increases in FDIC insurance premiums may have a material and adverse effect on our earnings.

The Dodd-Frank Act created the CFPB which is granted broad rulemaking, supervisory and enforcement powers under various federal consumer financial protection laws, including the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Truth in Lending Act, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, Fair Debt Collection Act, the Consumer Financial Privacy provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and certain other statutes. The CFPB has examination and primary enforcement authority with respect to depository institutions with $10 billion or more in assets. Depository institutions with less than $10 billion in assets, such as Equity Bank, are subject to rules promulgated by the CFPB, which may increase their compliance risk and the costs associated with their compliance efforts, but such banks will continue to be examined and supervised by federal banking regulators for consumer compliance purposes. The CFPB has authority to prevent unfair, deceptive or abusive practices in connection with the offering of consumer financial products.

The Dodd-Frank Act authorizes the CFPB to establish certain minimum standards for the origination of residential mortgages, including a determination of the borrower’s ability to repay. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act allows borrowers to raise certain defenses to foreclosure if they receive any loan other than a “qualified mortgage” as defined by the CFPB.

The CFPB has issued a number of regulations related to the origination of mortgages, foreclosure and overdrafts as well as many other consumer issues. Additionally, the CFPB has proposed, or will be proposing, additional regulations on issues that directly relate to our business. Although it is difficult to predict at this time the extent to which the CFPB’s final rules impact the operations and financial condition of Equity Bank, such rules may have a material impact on Equity Bank’s compliance costs, compliance risk and fee income.

Under the Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality of consumer financial records and prescribes procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of financial records, financial institutions are required to disclose their policies for collecting and protecting confidential information. Customers generally may prevent financial institutions from sharing personal financial information with nonaffiliated third parties except for third parties that market the institutions’ own products and services. Additionally, financial institutions generally may not disclose consumer account numbers to any nonaffiliated third party for use in telemarketing, direct mail marketing or other marketing through electronic mail to consumers.

Recent cyber-attacks against bank and other institutions that resulted in unauthorized access to confidential customer information have prompted the federal banking agencies to issue extensive guidance on cyber security. The regulatory agencies may devote more resources to this part of their safety and soundness examination than they may have in the past.

Like other lending institutions, our subsidiary bank uses credit bureau data in its underwriting activities. Use of that data is regulated under the Federal Credit Reporting Act on a uniform, nationwide basis. The act and its implementing regulation, Regulation V, cover credit reporting, prescreening, sharing of information between affiliates and the use of credit data. The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 allows states to enact identity theft laws that are not inconsistent with the conduct required by the provisions of the act.

The Patriot Act, International Money Laundering Abatement and Financial Anti-Terrorism Act and Bank Secrecy Act

A major focus of governmental policy on financial institutions has been aimed at combating money laundering and terrorist financing. The Patriot Act and the International Money Laundering and Financial Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001 substantially broadened the scope of U.S. anti-money laundering laws and penalties, specifically related to the Bank Secrecy Act and expanded the extra-territorial jurisdiction of the United States. The U.S. Treasury has issued a number of implementing regulations that apply various requirements of the Patriot Act to financial institutions, such as Equity Bank. These regulations impose obligations on financial institutions to maintain appropriate policies, procedures and controls to detect, prevent and report money laundering and terrorist financing and to verify the identity of their customers.

Failure of a financial institution and its holding company to maintain and implement adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, or to comply with relevant laws and regulations, could have serious legal, reputational and financial consequences for the institution. Because of the significance of regulatory emphasis on these requirements, Equity Bank will continue

to expend significant staffing, technology and financial resources to maintain programs designed to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations and an effective audit function for testing of Equity Bank’s compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act, on an ongoing basis.

The CRA requires that, in connection with examinations of financial institutions within its jurisdiction, the federal and the state banking regulators, as applicable, evaluate the record of each financial institution in meeting the credit needs of its local community, including low and moderate-income neighborhoods. These facts are also considered in evaluating mergers, acquisitions and applications to open a branch or facility. Failure to adequately meet these criteria could impose additional requirements and limitations on us. Additionally, we must publicly disclose the terms of various CRA-related agreements.

Interest and other charges that Equity Bank collects or contracts for are subject to state usury laws and federal laws concerning interest rates. Equity Bank’s loan operations are also subject to federal laws applicable to credit transactions, such as:

In addition, Equity Bank’s deposit operations are subject to the Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E issued by the Federal Reserve to implement such act, which govern automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit accounts and customers’ rights and liabilities arising from the use of automated teller machines and other electronic banking services.

The Federal Reserve and other federal banking regulatory agencies have promulgated guidance governing financial institutions with concentrations in commercial real estate lending. The guidance provides that a bank may be exposed to heightened commercial real estate lending concentration risk and subject to further supervisory analysis if (i) total reported loans for construction, land development and other land represent 100% or more of total capital or (ii) total reported loans secured by multifamily residential properties, non-farm non-residential properties and loans for construction, land development and other land, together with loans to finance commercial real estate, construction and land development activities that are not secured by real estate, represent 300% or more of total capital and the bank’s commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased 50% or more during the prior 36 months. If a concentration is present, management is expected to employ heightened risk management practices including board and management oversight and strategic planning, development of underwriting standards, risk assessment and monitoring through market analysis and stress testing and increasing capital requirements.

The commercial banking business is affected not only by general economic conditions but also by both U.S. fiscal policy and the monetary policies of the Federal Reserve. Some of the instruments of fiscal and monetary policy available to the Federal Reserve include changes in the discount rate on member bank borrowings, the fluctuating availability of borrowings at the “discount window,” open market operations, the imposition of and changes in reserve requirements against member banks’ deposits and assets of foreign branches, the imposition of and changes in reserve requirements against certain borrowings by banks and their affiliates and the placing of limits on interest rates that member banks may pay on time and savings deposits. Such policies influence, to a significant extent, the overall growth of bank loans, investments and deposits and the interest rates charged on loans or paid on time and savings deposits. We cannot predict the nature of future fiscal and monetary policies and the effect of such policies on the future business and our earnings.

Our business and results of operations are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. The material risks and uncertainties that management believes affect the Company are described below. Additional risks and uncertainties that management is not aware of, or that management currently deems immaterial, may also impair the Company’s business operations. This report is qualified in its entirety by these risk factors. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. If this were to happen, the value of our securities could decline significantly, and you could lose all or part of your investment. Some statements in the following risk factors constitute forward-looking statements. Please refer to “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

While not an exhaustive list, the principal risks that we believe could adversely affect our ~~risk factors are generally composed~~business, financial condition or results of ~~the following items:~~operations include:

The foregoing factors should not be construed as exhaustive. This summary of risk factors should be read in conjunction with the more detailed risk factors below.

Recessionary conditions could result in increases in our level of nonperforming loans and/or reduced demand for our products and services, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Economic recession or other economic problems, including those affecting our markets and regions, but also those affecting the U.S. or world economies, could have a material adverse impact on the demand for our products and services. If economic conditions deteriorate, or if there are negative developments affecting the domestic and international credit markets, the value of our loans and investments may be harmed, which in turn would have an adverse effect on our financial performance and our financial condition may be adversely affected. In addition, although deteriorating market conditions could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, we may not benefit from any market growth or favorable economic conditions, either in our primary market areas or nationally, even if they do occur.

Changes in economic conditions could cause an increase in delinquencies and nonperforming assets, including loan charge-offs, which could depress our net income and growth.

Our loan portfolio includes many real estate secured loans, demand for which may decrease during economic downturns as a result of, among other things, an increase in unemployment, a decrease in real estate values and a slowdown in housing. If we see negative economic conditions develop in the United States as a whole or our Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma markets, we could experience higher delinquencies and loan charge-offs, which would reduce our net income and adversely affect our financial condition. Furthermore, to the extent that real estate collateral is obtained through foreclosure, the costs of holding and marketing the real estate collateral, as well as the ultimate values obtained from disposition, could reduce our earnings and adversely affect our financial condition.

The value of real estate collateral may fluctuate significantly resulting in an under-collateralized loan portfolio.

The market value of real estate, particularly real estate held for investment, can fluctuate significantly in a short period of time as a result of market conditions in the geographic area in which the real estate is located. If the value of the real estate serving as collateral for our loan portfolio were to decline materially, a significant part of our loan portfolio could become under-collateralized. If the loans that are collateralized by real estate become troubled during a time when market conditions are declining or have declined, then, in the event of foreclosure, we may not be able to realize the amount of collateral that we anticipated at the time of originating the loan. This could have a material adverse effect on our provision for ~~loan~~credit losses and our operating results and financial condition.

External economic factors, such as changes in monetary policy and inflation and deflation, may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our financial condition and results of operations are affected by credit policies of monetary authorities, particularly the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or the Federal Reserve. Actions by monetary and fiscal authorities, including the Federal Reserve, could lead to inflation, deflation or other economic phenomena that could adversely affect our financial performance. The primary impact of inflation on our operations most likely will be reflected in increased operating costs. Conversely, deflation generally will tend to erode collateral values and diminish loan quality. Virtually all of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a more significant impact on our performance than general levels of inflation or deflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or by the same magnitude as the prices of goods and services.

Volatility in commodity prices may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

In addition to the geographic concentration of our markets, certain industry-specific economic factors also affect us. For example, while we do not have a concentration in energy lending, the industry is cyclical and recently has experienced a significant drop in crude oil and natural gas prices. In addition, we make loans to customers involved in the agricultural industry, many of whom are also impacted by fluctuations in commodity prices. Volatility in commodity prices could adversely impact the ability of borrowers in these industries to perform under the terms of their borrowing arrangements with us and, as a result, a severe and prolonged decline in commodity prices may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. It is also difficult to project future commodity prices as they are dependent upon many different factors beyond our control.

As a lender, we are exposed to the risk that our loan customers may not repay their loans according to the terms of these loans and the collateral securing the payment of these loans may be insufficient to fully compensate us for the outstanding balance of the loan plus the costs to dispose of the collateral. We may experience significant ~~loan~~credit losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. Management makes various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio, including the diversification by industry of our commercial loan portfolio, the amount of nonperforming loans and related collateral, the volume, growth and composition of our loan portfolio, the effects on the loan portfolio of current economic indicators and their probable impact on borrowers and the evaluation of our loan portfolio through our internal loan review process and other relevant factors.

We maintain an allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses, which is an allowance established through a provision for ~~loan~~credit losses charged to expense that represents management’s best estimate of probable incurred losses in our loan portfolio. Additional credit losses will likely occur in the future and may occur at a rate greater than we have experienced to date. In determining the amount of the allowance, we rely on an analysis of our loan portfolio, our experience and our evaluation of general economic conditions. If our assumptions, ~~including our qualitative factors or the implementation of ASC Topic 326 Current Expected Credit Loss (“CECL”) in 2021 and for future periods,~~ prove to be incorrect, our current allowance may not be sufficient and adjustments may be necessary to allow for different economic conditions or adverse developments in our loan portfolio. In addition, as an acquirer of other banks, our allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses may not be sufficient when coupled with purchase discounts on acquired portfolios. Material additions to the allowance could materially decrease our net income.

In addition, banking regulators periodically review our allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses and may require us to increase our provision for ~~loan~~credit losses or recognize further charge-offs, based on judgments different than those of our management. Any increase in our allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses or charge-offs as required by these regulatory agencies could have a material negative effect on our operating results, financial condition and liquidity.

We could suffer losses from a decline in the credit quality of the assets that we hold.

We could sustain losses if borrowers, guarantors, and related parties fail to perform in accordance with the terms of their loans. We have adopted underwriting and credit monitoring procedures and policies that we believe are appropriate to minimize this risk, including the establishment and review of the allowance for credit losses, periodic assessment of the likelihood of nonperformance, tracking loan performance and diversifying our credit portfolio. These policies and procedures, however, may not prevent unexpected losses that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In particular, we face credit quality risks presented by past, current and potential economic and real estate market conditions.

A significant portion of our loan portfolio is secured by real estate, and events that negatively impact the real estate market could negatively impact our business.

There are significant risks associated with real estate-based lending. Real estate collateral may deteriorate in value during the time that credit is extended, in which case we might not be able to sell such collateral for an amount necessary to satisfy a defaulting borrower’s obligation to us. In that event, there could be a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, commercial real estate loans are subject to unique risks. These types of loans are often viewed as having more risks than residential real estate or other consumer loans, primarily because relatively large amounts are loans to a relatively small number of borrowers. Thus, the deterioration of even a small number of these loans could cause a significant increase in the loan loss allowance or loan charge-offs, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, commercial real estate loans depend on cash flows from the property securing the debt. Cash flows may be affected significantly by general economic conditions and a downturn in a local economy in one of our markets or in occupancy rates where a property is located could increase the likelihood of default.

The foregoing risks are enhanced as a result of the limited geographic scope of our principal markets. Most of the real estate securing our loans is located in our Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma markets. Because the value of this collateral depends upon local real estate market conditions and is affected by, among other things, neighborhood characteristics, real estate tax rates, the cost of operating the properties and local governmental regulation, adverse changes in any of these factors in our markets could cause a decline in the value of the collateral securing a significant portion of our loan portfolio. Further, the concentration of real estate collateral in these four markets limits our ability to diversify the risk of such occurrences.

A large portion of our loan portfolio is comprised of commercial loans that are secured by accounts receivable, inventory, equipment or other asset-based collateral, and deterioration in the value of such collateral could increase our exposure to future probable losses.

These commercial loans are typically larger in amount than loans to individuals and therefore, have the potential for larger losses on a single loan basis. Additionally, asset-based borrowers are often highly leveraged and have inconsistent historical earnings and cash flows. Historically, losses in our commercial credits have been higher than losses in other classes of our loan portfolio. Significant adverse changes in our borrowers’ industries and businesses could cause rapid declines in values of, and collectability associated with, those business assets, which could result in inadequate collateral coverage for our commercial loans and expose us to future losses. An increase in specific reserves and charge-offs related to our commercial loan portfolio could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

Our use of appraisals in deciding whether to make a loan secured by real property does not ensure the value of the real property collateral.

In considering whether to make a loan secured by real property, we generally require an appraisal. However, an appraisal is only an estimate of the value of the property at the time the appraisal is made. If the appraisal does not reflect the amount that may be obtained upon any sale or foreclosure of the property, we may not realize an amount equal to the indebtedness secured by the property.

A portion of our loan portfolio is comprised of participation and syndicated transaction interests, which could have an adverse effect on our ability to monitor the lending relationships and lead to an increased risk of loss.

We participate in loans originated by other institutions and in syndicated transactions (including shared national credits) in which other lenders serve as the agent bank. Our reduced control over the monitoring and management of these relationships, particularly participations in large bank groups, could lead to increased risk of loss, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

Our largest loan relationships currently make up a material percentage of our total loan portfolio.

As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, our ten largest loan relationships totaled over ~~$241.3~~$306.2 million in loan exposure, or ~~9.3%~~9.7% of the total loan portfolio. The concentration risk associated with having a small number of large loan relationships is that, if one or more of these relationships were to become delinquent or suffer default, we could be at serious risk of material losses. The allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses may not be adequate to cover losses associated with any of these relationships and any loss or increase in the allowance would negatively affect our earnings and capital. Even if the loans are collateralized, the large increase in classified assets could harm our reputation with our regulators, investors and potential investors and inhibit our ability to execute our business plan.

We may not be able to adequately measure and limit the credit risk associated with our loan portfolio, which could adversely affect our profitability.

As a part of the products and services that we offer, we make commercial and commercial real estate loans. The principal economic risk associated with each class of loans is the creditworthiness of the borrower, which is affected by the strength of the relevant business market segment, local market conditions and general economic conditions. Additional factors related to the credit quality of commercial loans include the quality of the management of the business and the borrower’s ability both to properly evaluate changes in the supply and demand characteristics affecting our market for products and services and to effectively respond to those changes. Additional factors related to the credit quality of commercial real estate loans include tenant vacancy rates and the quality of management of the property. A failure to effectively measure and limit the credit risk associated with our loan portfolio could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We could be adversely affected by the soundness of other financial institutions.

Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty or other relationships. We have exposure to many different industries and counterparties, and routinely execute transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including commercial banks, brokers and dealers, investment banks and other institutional clients. Many of these transactions expose us to credit risk in the event of a default by a counterparty or client. In addition, our credit risk may be exacerbated when our collateral cannot be foreclosed upon or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the credit or derivative exposure due. Any such losses could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

~~A new accounting standard will result in a significant change in how we recognize credit losses and may have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.~~

In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting standard update, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” which replaces the current “incurred loss” model for recognizing credit losses with an “expected loss” model referred to as the Current Expected Credit Loss (“CECL”) model. Under the CECL model, we will be required to present certain financial assets carried at amortized cost, such as loans held for investment and held-to-maturity debt securities, at the net amount expected to be collected. The measurement of expected credit losses is to be based on information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. This measurement will take place at the time the financial asset is first added to the balance sheet and periodically thereafter. This differs significantly from the “incurred loss” model required under current general accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), which delays recognition until it is probable a loss has been incurred. Accordingly, we expect that the adoption of the CECL model will materially affect how we determine our allowance for loan losses and could require us to significantly increase our allowance. Moreover, the CECL model may create more volatility in the level of our allowance for loan losses. If we are required to materially increase our level of allowance for loan losses for any reason, such increase could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The new CECL standard will become effective for us on January 1, 2021, and for interim periods beginning March 31, 2021. For additional information about the Company’s adoption of CECL and the projected impact from adoption see “NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES” in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financial Condition – Allowance for loan losses”.

Our profitability depends substantially upon our net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between the interest earned on assets (such as loans and securities held in our investment portfolio) and the interest paid for liabilities (such as interest paid on savings and money market accounts and time deposits). Income associated with interest-earning assets and costs associated with interest-bearing liabilities may not be affected uniformly by fluctuations in interest rates. The magnitude and duration of changes in interest rates are events over which we have no control and such changes may have an adverse effect on our net interest income. Prepayment and early withdrawal levels, which are also impacted by changes in interest rates, can significantly affect our assets and liabilities. For example, an increase in interest rates could, among other things, reduce the demand for loans and decrease loan repayment rates. Such an increase could also adversely affect the ability of our floating-rate borrowers to meet their higher payment obligations, which could in turn lead to an increase in nonperforming assets and net charge-offs. Conversely, a decrease in the general level of interest rates could affect us by, among other things, leading to greater competition for deposits and incentivizing borrowers to prepay or refinance their loans more quickly or frequently than they otherwise would. The primary tool that management uses to measure interest rate risk is a simulation model that evaluates the impact of varying levels of prevailing interest rates and the impact on net interest income and the economic value of equity. Generally, the interest rates on our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities do not change at the same rate, to the same extent or on the same basis. Even assets and liabilities with similar maturities or re-pricing periods may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in general market interest rates, while interest rates on other types of assets and liabilities may lag behind changes in general market rates. Certain assets, such as fixed and adjustable rate mortgage loans, have features that limit changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. Changes in interest rates could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. See “Item 7A – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk” for a discussion of interest rate risk modeling and the inherent risks in modeling assumptions.

Market interest rates for loans, investments and deposits are highly sensitive to many factors beyond our control.

Generally, interest rate spreads (the difference between interest rates earned on assets and interest rates paid on liabilities) have narrowed in recent years as a result of changing market conditions, policies of various government and regulatory authorities and competitive pricing pressures and we cannot predict whether these rate spreads will narrow even further. This narrowing of interest rate spreads could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we cannot predict whether interest rates will continue to remain at present levels. Changes in interest rates may cause significant changes, up or down, in our net interest income.

We attempt to minimize the adverse effects of changes in interest rates by structuring our asset-liability composition in order to obtain the maximum spread between interest income and interest expense. However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in minimizing the adverse effects of changes in interest rates. Depending on our portfolio of loans and investments, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by changes in interest rates.

In 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority announced that after 2021 it would no longer compel banks to submit the rates required to calculate LIBOR. This announcement indicates that the continuation of LIBOR on the current basis cannot and will not be guaranteed after 2021. It remains unclear what rate or rates may develop as accepted alternatives to LIBOR, or what the effect of such changes will be on the markets for LIBOR-based financial instruments. The Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) has been recommended by the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (a group of private-market participants convened by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York) as an alternative for USD LIBOR, but uncertainty as to the adoption, market acceptance or availability of SOFR or other alternative reference rates may adversely affect the value of LIBOR or SOFR-based assets and liabilities held or issued by the Company.

We occasionally have loans, derivative contracts, borrowings and other financial instruments with attributes that are either directly or indirectly dependent on LIBOR. The transition from LIBOR could create considerable costs and additional risk. Since proposed alternative rates are calculated differently, payments under contracts referencing new rates will differ from those referencing LIBOR. The transition will change our market risk profiles, requiring changes to risk and pricing models, valuation tools, product design and hedging strategies. Furthermore, failure to adequately manage this transition process with our customers could adversely impact our reputation.

The language in our contracts and financial instruments that define and use LIBOR have developed over time and have various events that trigger when a successor rate to the designated rate would be selected. If a trigger is satisfied, contracts and financial instruments often give the calculation agent (which may be us) discretion over the successor rate or benchmark to be selected. As a result, there is considerable uncertainty as to how the financial services industry will address the discontinuance of designated rates in contracts and financial instruments or such designated rates ceasing to be acceptable reference rates. This uncertainty could ultimately result in client disputes and litigation surrounding the proper interpretation of our LIBOR-based contracts and financial instruments.

Although we are currently unable to assess what the ultimate impact of the transition from LIBOR will be, failure to adequately manage the transition could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The outbreak of COVID-19, or other such epidemic, pandemic, or highly contagious disease occurring in the United States or in the geographies in which we conduct operations, could adversely affect the Company’s business operations, asset valuations, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company’s business is dependent upon the willingness and ability of our customers to conduct banking and other financial transactions. The COVID-19 outbreak, or other highly contagious or infectious disease, could negatively impact the ability of our employees and customers to conduct such transactions and disrupt the business activities and operations of our customers in the geographic areas in which we operate. The spread of the COVID-19 virus had an impact on our operations during 2020 and 2021, and the Company expects that the virus will continue to have an impact on the business, financial condition, and results of operations of the Company and its customers during ~~2021.~~2022. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused changes in the behavior of customers, businesses, and their employees, including illness, quarantines, social distancing practices, cancellation of events and travel, business and school shutdowns, reduction in commercial activity and financial transactions, supply chain interruptions, increased unemployment, and overall economic and financial market instability. Future effects, including additional actions taken by federal, state, and local governments to contain COVID-19 or treat its impact, are unknown. Any sustained disruption to our operations is likely to negatively impact the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Notwithstanding our contingency plans and other safeguards against pandemics or another contagious disease, the spread of COVID-19 could also negatively impact the availability of Equity Bank staff who are necessary to conduct our business operations, as well as potentially impact the business and operations third party service providers who perform critical services for us. If the response to contain COVID-19, or another highly infectious or contagious disease, is unsuccessful, the Company could experience a material adverse effect on our business operations, asset valuations, financial condition, and results of operations. Material adverse impacts may include all or a combination of valuation impairments on the Company’s intangible assets, investments, loans, loan servicing rights, deferred tax assets, or counter-party risk derivatives.

Our financial performance will be negatively impacted if we are unable to execute our growth strategy.

Our current growth strategy is to grow organically and supplement that growth with select acquisitions. Our ability to grow organically depends primarily on generating loans and deposits of acceptable risk and expense and we may not be successful in continuing this organic growth. Our ability to identify appropriate markets for expansion, recruit and retain qualified personnel and fund growth at a reasonable cost depends upon prevailing economic conditions, maintenance of sufficient capital, competitive factors, and changes in banking laws, among other factors. Conversely, if we grow too quickly and are unable to control costs and maintain

asset quality, such growth, whether organic or through select acquisitions, could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We may not be able to identify and acquire other financial institutions, which could hinder our ability to continue to grow.

A substantial part of our historical growth has been a result of acquisitions of other financial institutions. We intend to continue our strategy of evaluating and selectively acquiring other financial institutions that serve customers or markets we find desirable. However, the market for acquisitions remains highly competitive and we may be unable to find satisfactory acquisition candidates in the future that fit our acquisition strategy. To the extent that we are unable to find suitable acquisition candidates, an important component of our strategy may be lost. If we are able to identify attractive acquisition opportunities, we must generally satisfy a number of conditions prior to completing any such transaction, including certain bank regulatory approval, which has become substantially more difficult, time-consuming and unpredictable as a result of the recent financial crisis. Additionally, any future acquisitions may not produce the revenue, earnings or synergies that we anticipated.

Our strategy of pursuing acquisitions exposes us to financial, execution, compliance and operational risks that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

We intend to continue pursuing a strategy that includes acquisitions. An acquisition strategy involves significant risks, including the following:

The market for acquisition targets is highly competitive, which may adversely affect our ability to find acquisition candidates that fit our strategy and standards. We face significant competition in pursuing acquisition targets from other banks and financial institutions, many of which possess greater financial, human, technical and other resources than we do. Our ability to compete in acquiring target institutions will depend on our available financial resources to fund the acquisitions, including the amount of cash and cash equivalents we have and the liquidity and market price of our Class A common stock. In addition, increased competition may also drive up the acquisition consideration that we will be required to pay in order to successfully capitalize on attractive acquisition opportunities. To the extent that we are unable to find suitable acquisition targets, an important component of our growth strategy may not be realized.

Acquisitions of financial institutions and branches also involve operational risks and uncertainties, such as unknown or contingent liabilities with no available manner of recourse, exposure to unexpected problems such as asset quality, the retention of key employees and customers and other issues that could negatively affect our business. We may not be able to complete future acquisitions or, if completed, we may not be able to successfully integrate the operations, technology platforms, management, products and services of the entities that we acquire or to realize our attempts to eliminate redundancies. The integration process may also require significant time and attention from our management that would otherwise be directed toward servicing existing business and developing new business. Failure to successfully integrate the entities we acquire into our existing operations in a timely manner may increase our operating costs significantly and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, acquisitions typically involve the payment of a premium over book and market values and therefore, some dilution of our tangible book value and net income per common share may occur in connection with any future acquisition and the carrying amount of any goodwill that we currently maintain or may acquire may be subject to impairment in future periods.

If we continue to grow, we will face risks arising from our increased size. If we do not manage such growth effectively, we may be unable to realize the benefit from the investments in technology, infrastructure and personnel that we have made to support our expansion. In addition, we may incur higher costs and realize less revenue growth than we expect, which would reduce our earnings and diminish our future prospects and we may not be able to continue to implement our business strategy and successfully conduct our operations. Risks associated with failing to maintain effective financial and operational controls as we grow, such as maintaining appropriate loan underwriting procedures, information technology systems, determining adequate allowances for ~~loan~~credit losses and

complying with regulatory accounting requirements, including increased ~~loan~~credit losses, reduced earnings and potential regulatory penalties and restrictions on growth, all could have a negative effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Acquisitions may disrupt our business and dilute stockholder value and integrating acquired companies may be more difficult, costly or time-consuming than we expect.

Our pursuit of acquisitions may disrupt our business and any equity that we issue as merger consideration may have the effect of diluting the value of common stockholders. In addition, we may fail to realize some or all of the anticipated benefits of completed acquisitions. We anticipate that the integration of businesses that we may acquire in the future will be a time-consuming and expensive process, even if the integration process is effectively planned and implemented.

In addition, our acquisition activities could be material to our business and involve a number of significant risks, including the following:

If difficulties arise with respect to the integration process, the economic benefits expected to result from acquisitions might not occur. As with any merger of financial institutions, there also may be business disruptions that cause us to lose customers or cause customers to move their business to other financial institutions. Failure to successfully integrate businesses that we acquire could have an adverse effect on our profitability, return on equity, return on assets or our ability to implement our strategy, any of which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We rely heavily on our management team and could be adversely affected by the unexpected loss of key officers.

We are led by an experienced management team with substantial experience in the markets that we serve and the financial products that we offer. Our operating strategy focuses on providing products and services through long-term relationship managers. Accordingly, our success depends in large part on the performance of our key personnel, as well as on our ability to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified senior and middle management. Competition for employees is intense and the process of locating key personnel with the combination of skills and attributes required to execute our business plan may be lengthy. We may not be successful in retaining our key employees and the unexpected loss of services of one or more of our key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business because of their skills, knowledge of our market and financial products, years of industry experience, long-term customer relationships and the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel. If the services of any of our key personnel should become unavailable for any reason, we may not be able to identify and hire qualified persons on terms acceptable to us, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business is concentrated in, and largely dependent upon, the continued growth and welfare of the general geographic markets in which we operate.

Our banking operations are concentrated in Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma. As a result, our financial condition and results of operations and cash flows are affected by changes in the economic conditions of our markets. Our success depends to a significant extent upon the business activity, population, income levels, deposits and real estate activity in these markets. Although our customers’ business and financial interests may extend well beyond these market areas, adverse conditions that affect these market

areas could reduce our growth rate, affect the ability of our customers to repay their loans, affect the value of collateral underlying loans, impact our ability to attract deposits and generally affect our financial conditions and results of operations. Because of our geographic concentration, we may be less able than other regional or national financial institutions to diversify our credit risks across multiple markets.

Difficult conditions in the market for financial products and services may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Recessionary periods historically have brought about increased foreclosures and unemployment which have resulted in significant write-downs of asset values by financial institutions, including government-sponsored entities and major commercial and investment banks. These write-downs, initially of mortgage-backed securities but spreading to credit default swaps and other derivative securities, have historically caused many financial institutions to seek additional capital, to merge with larger and stronger institutions and, in some cases, to fail. This market turmoil and tightening of credit have led to an increased level of commercial and consumer delinquencies, lack of consumer confidence, increased market volatility and widespread reduction of business activity generally. Although conditions have improved, a return of these trends could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations. Negative market developments may affect consumer confidence levels and may cause adverse changes in payment patterns, causing increases in delinquencies and default rates, which may impact our charge-offs and provisions for loan and credit losses. Economic deterioration that affects household and/or corporate incomes could also result in reduced demand for credit or fee-based products and services. These conditions would have adverse effects on us and others in the financial services industry.

Our ability to grow our loan portfolio may be limited by, among other things, economic conditions, competition within our market areas, the timing of loan repayments and seasonality.

Our ability to continue to improve our operating results is dependent upon, among other things, growing our loan portfolio. While we believe that our strategy to grow our loan portfolio is sound and our growth targets are achievable over an extended period of time, competition within our market areas is significant, particularly for high credit quality borrowers. We compete with both large regional and national financial institutions, who are sometimes able to offer more attractive interest rates and other financial terms than we choose to offer, as well as other community-based banks who seek to offer a similar level of service to that which we offer. This competition can make loan growth challenging, particularly if we are unwilling to price loans at levels that would cause unacceptable levels of compression of our net interest margin or if we are unwilling to structure a loan in a manner that we believe results in a level of risk to us that we are not willing to accept. Moreover, loan growth throughout the year can fluctuate due in part to seasonality of the businesses of our borrowers and potential borrowers and the timing on loan repayments, particularly those of our borrowers with significant relationships with us, resulting from, among other things, excess levels of liquidity. To the extent that we are unable to increase loans, we may be unable to successfully implement our growth strategy, which could materially and adversely affect us.

Several of our large depositors have relationships with each other, which creates a higher risk that one customer’s withdrawal of its deposit could lead to a loss of other deposits from customers within the relationship, which, in turn, could force us to fund our business through more expensive and less stable sources.

As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, our ten largest non-brokered depositors accounted for ~~$279.3~~$320.7 million in deposits, or approximately ~~8.1%~~7.3% of our total deposits. Further, our non-brokered deposit account balance was ~~$3.41~~$4.37 billion, or approximately ~~98.9%~~98.8% of our total deposits, as of December 31, ~~2020.~~2021. Several of our large depositors have business, family or other relationships with each other, which creates a risk that any one customer’s withdrawal of its deposit could lead to a loss of other deposits from customers within the relationship.

Withdrawals of deposits by any one of our largest depositors or by one of our related customer groups could force us to rely more heavily on borrowings and other sources of funding for our business and withdrawal demands, adversely affecting our net interest margin and results of operations. We may also be forced, as a result of any withdrawal of deposits, to rely more heavily on other, potentially more expensive and less stable funding sources. Consequently, the occurrence of any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and future prospects.

Our future profitability levels are dependent on our ability to grow and maintain deposits at competitive costs.

Our ability to fund our lending and investing activities at a reasonable cost depends on our ability to maintain adequate deposit levels at an economically competitive cost structure. The following risks could impact the cost structures of deposits:

Our ability to retain bankers and recruit additional successful bankers is critical to the success of our business strategy and any failure to do so could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

Our ability to retain and grow our loans, deposits and fee income depends upon the business generation capabilities, reputation and relationship management skills of our bankers. If we were to lose the services of any of our bankers, including successful bankers employed by banks that we may acquire, to a new or existing competitor or otherwise, we may not be able to retain valuable relationships and some of our customers could choose to use the services of a competitor instead of our services.

Our growth strategy also relies on our ability to attract and retain additional profitable bankers. We may face difficulties in recruiting and retaining bankers of our desired caliber, including as a result of competition from other financial institutions. In particular, many of our competitors are significantly larger with greater financial resources and may be able to offer more attractive compensation packages and broader career opportunities. Additionally, we may incur significant expenses and expend significant time and resources on training, integration and business development before we are able to determine whether a new banker will be profitable or effective. If we are unable to attract and retain successful bankers, or if our bankers fail to meet our expectations in terms of customer relationships and profitability, we may be unable to execute our business strategy and our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects may be adversely affected.

Any expansion into new markets or new lines of business might not be successful.

As part of our ongoing strategic plan, we may consider expansion into new geographic markets. Such expansion might take the form of the establishment of de novo branches or the acquisition of existing banks or bank branches. There are considerable costs associated with opening new branches and new branches generally do not generate sufficient revenues to offset costs until they have been in operation for some time. Additionally, we may consider expansion into new lines of business through the acquisition of third parties or organic growth and development. There are substantial risks associated with such efforts, including risks that (i) revenues from such activities might not be sufficient to offset the development, compliance and other implementation costs, (ii) competing products and services and shifting market preferences might affect the profitability of such activities and (iii) our internal controls might be inadequate to manage the risks associated with new activities. Furthermore, it is possible that our unfamiliarity with new markets or lines of business might adversely affect the success of such actions. If any such expansions into new geographic or product markets are not successful, there could be an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our small to medium-sized business and entrepreneurial customers may have fewer financial resources than larger entities to weather a downturn in the economy that might impair a borrower’s ability to repay a loan and could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We focus our business development and marketing strategy primarily to serve the banking and financial services needs of small to medium-sized businesses and entrepreneurs. These small to medium-sized businesses and entrepreneurs may have fewer financial resources in terms of capital or borrowing capacity than larger entities. If economic conditions negatively impact our markets generally, and small to medium-sized businesses are adversely affected, our financial condition and results of operations may be negatively affected.

A lack of liquidity could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Liquidity is essential to our business. We rely on our ability to generate deposits and effectively manage the repayment and maturity schedules of our loans to ensure that we have adequate liquidity to fund our operations. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale of loans and other sources could have a substantial negative effect on our liquidity. Our most important source of funds is deposits. Deposit balances can decrease when customers perceive alternative investments as providing a better risk/return tradeoff. If customers move money out of bank deposits and into other investments such as money market funds, we would lose a relatively low-cost source of funds, increasing our funding costs and reducing our net interest income and net income.

Other primary sources of funds consist of cash flows from operations, maturities and sales of investment securities and proceeds from the issuance and sale of our equity securities to investors. Additional liquidity is provided by the ability to borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka. We also may borrow funds from third-party lenders, such as other financial institutions. Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance or capitalize our activities, or on terms that are acceptable to us, could be impaired by factors that affect us directly or the financial services industry or economy in general, such as disruptions in the financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry. Our access to funding sources could also be affected by a decrease in the level of our business activity as a result of a downturn in our markets or by one or more adverse regulatory actions against us.

Any decline in available funding could adversely impact our ability to originate loans, invest in securities, meet our expenses or to fulfill obligations such as repaying our borrowings or meeting deposit withdrawal demands, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity, business, financial condition and results of operations.

As a community banking institution, we have lower lending limits and different lending risks than certain of our larger, more diversified competitors.

We are a community banking institution that provides banking services to the local communities in the market areas in which we operate. Our ability to diversify our economic risks is limited by our own local markets and economies. We lend primarily to individuals and small to medium-sized businesses, which may expose us to greater lending risks than those of banks that lend to larger, better-capitalized businesses with longer operating histories. In addition, our legally mandated lending limits are lower than those of certain of our competitors that have more capital than we do. These lower lending limits may discourage borrowers with lending needs that exceed our limits from doing business with us. We may try to serve such borrowers by selling loan participations to other financial institutions; however, this strategy may not succeed.

Our financial projections are based upon numerous assumptions about future events and our actual financial performance may differ materially from our projections if our assumptions are inaccurate.

If the communities in which we operate do not grow, or if the prevailing economic conditions locally or nationally are less favorable than we have assumed, then our ability to reduce our nonperforming loans and other real estate owned portfolios and to implement our business strategies may be adversely affected and our actual financial performance may be materially different from our projections.

Moreover, we cannot give any assurance that we will benefit from any market growth or favorable economic conditions in our market areas even if they do occur. If our senior management team is unable to provide the effective leadership necessary to implement our strategic plan our actual financial performance may be materially adversely different from our projections. Additionally, to the extent that any component of our strategic plan requires regulatory approval, if we are unable to obtain necessary approval, we will be unable to completely implement our strategy, which may adversely affect our actual financial results. Our inability to successfully implement our strategic plan could adversely affect the price of our Class A common stock.

We depend on the accuracy and completeness of information about customers and counterparties.

In deciding whether to extend credit or enter into other transactions with customers and counterparties, we may rely on information furnished to us by or on behalf of customers and counterparties, including financial statements and other financial information. We also may rely on representations of customers and counterparties as to the accuracy and completeness of that information and, with respect to financial statements, on reports of independent auditors. In deciding whether to extend credit, we may rely upon our customers’ representations that their financial statements conform to GAAP and present fairly, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the customer. We also may rely on customer representations and certifications or other audit or accountants’ reports, with respect to the business and financial condition of our clients. Our financial condition, results of operations, financial reporting and reputation could be negatively affected if we rely on materially misleading, false, inaccurate or fraudulent information.

We are subject to possible claims and litigation pertaining to fiduciary responsibility.

From time to time, customers could make claims and take legal action pertaining to our performance of our fiduciary responsibilities. Whether customer claims and legal action related to our performance of our fiduciary responsibilities are founded or unfounded, if such claims and legal actions are not resolved in a manner favorable to us, they may result in significant financial liability and/or adversely affect our market perception of our products and services as well as impact customer demand for those products and services. Any financial liability or reputation damage could have a material adverse effect on our business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We continually encounter technological change and may have fewer resources than our competitors to continue to invest in technological improvements.

The banking and financial services industries are undergoing rapid technological changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. In addition to enhancing the level of service provided to customers, the effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to reduce costs. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that enhance customer convenience and create additional efficiencies in operations. Many of our competitors have greater resources to invest in technological improvements and we may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services, which could reduce our ability to effectively compete.

We rely heavily on communications and information systems to conduct our business. Any failure or interruption in the operation of these systems could impair or prevent the effective operation of our customer relationship management, general ledger, deposit, lending or other functions. While we have policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of a failure or interruption in the operation of our information systems, there can be no assurance that any such failures or interruptions will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed. The occurrence of any failures or interruptions impacting our information systems could damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business and expose us to additional regulatory scrutiny, civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We use information technology in our operations and offer online banking services to our customers, and unauthorized access to our or our customers’ confidential or proprietary information as a result of a cyber-attack or otherwise could expose us to reputational harm and litigation and adversely affect our ability to attract and retain customers.

Information security risks for financial institutions have generally increased in recent years, in part because of the proliferation of new technologies, the use of the internet and telecommunications technologies to conduct financial transactions and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, hackers, terrorists, activists and other external parties. The financial services industry has seen increases in electronic fraudulent activity, hacking, security breaches, sophisticated social engineering and cyber-attacks, including in the commercial banking sector, as cyber criminals have been targeting commercial bank ~~and brokerage~~ accounts on an increasing basis. We are under continuous threat of loss due to fraudulent activity, hacking and cyber-attacks, especially as we continue to expand customer capabilities to utilize internet and other remote channels to transact business.

Our risk and exposure to these matters remains heightened because of the evolving nature and complexity of these threats from cyber criminals and hackers, our plans to continue to provide internet banking and mobile banking channels and our plans to develop additional remote connectivity solutions to serve our customers. Therefore, the secure processing, transmission and storage of information in connection with our online banking services are critical elements of our operations. However, our network ~~could be~~is vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer viruses and other malware, phishing schemes or other security failures. In addition, our customers may use personal smartphones, tablet PCs or other mobile devices that are beyond our control systems in order to access our products and services. Our

technologies, systems and networks and our customers’ devices, may become the target of cyber-attacks, electronic fraud or information security breaches that could result in the unauthorized release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss or destruction of our or our customers’ confidential, proprietary and other information, or otherwise disrupt our or our customers’ or other third parties’ business operations. As cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to spend significant capital and other resources to protect against these threats or to alleviate or investigate problems caused by such threats. Our business relies on the secure processing, storage, transmission and retrieval of confidential customer information in our computer and data management systems and networks, and in the computer and data management systems and networks of third parties, and any breaches or unauthorized access to such information could present significant regulatory costs and expose us to litigation and other possible liabilities. Any inability to prevent these types of security threats could also cause existing customers to lose confidence in our systems and could adversely affect our reputation and ability to generate deposits. ~~While we have not experienced any material losses relating to cyber-attacks or other information security breaches to date, we may suffer such losses in the future.~~ The occurrence of any cyber-attack or information security breach could result in financial losses or increased costs to us or our clients, disclosure or misuse of confidential information belonging to us or personal or confidential information belonging to our clients, misappropriation of assets, reputational damage, damage to our competitive position and the disruption of our operations, all of which could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.

We sustained a sophisticated cyber-attack in November 2021 involving malware on our internal network that caused a network disruption and impacted certain of our systems. We do not believe that the cyber-attack impacted or gained access to our core processing system. Our security system detected the cyber-attack and was able to secure our data before such data was encrypted by the cyber-attackers. Once alerted, we undertook steps to address the incident, including engaging a team of third-party forensic experts and notifying law enforcement and key regulators. We restored network systems and resumed normal operations by November 2, 2021.

Our investigation revealed that an unauthorized third party was able to access and copy certain information from our internal network, including customer, employee and vendor information. We believe all of the impacted data was returned to us and currently have no indication that the impacted data has been misused. However, the misuse, or perceived misuse, of sensitive or confidential information regarding our business or our customers could cause harm to our reputation and result in the loss of business with existing or potential customers, which could adversely impact its business, results of operations and financial condition.

Although we maintain cybersecurity insurance coverage insuring against costs resulting from cyber-attacks (including the November 2021 attack), the costs and expenses incurred in connection with the November 2021 attack include both direct and indirect costs and are not all covered by its insurance coverage. In addition, ~~to well-known risks related to fraudulent activity, which take many forms, such as check “kiting” or fraud, wire fraud and other dishonest acts,~~in the event of future cyber-attacks, our cybersecurity insurance may not cover all of our losses.

Based on the information ~~security breaches and cybersecurity-related incidents~~currently known, we do not believe that the November 2021 cyber-attack will have ~~become~~ a material ~~risk~~impact on our business, results of operations or financial condition, but no assurances can be given as we continue to assess the full impact from the incident, including costs, expenses and insurance coverage. However, we may also be subject to future incidents that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition or may result in ~~the~~operational impairments and financial ~~services industry. These threats may include fraudulent or unauthorized access~~losses, as well as significant harm to ~~data processing or data storage systems used by us or by~~ our clients, electronic identity theft, “phishing”, account takeover, denial or degradation of service attacks and malware or other cyber-attacks. These electronic viruses or malicious code are typically designed to, among other things:reputation.

In recent periods, several governmental agencies and large corporations, including financial service organizations and retail companies, have suffered major data breaches, in some cases exposing not only their confidential and proprietary corporate information, but also sensitive financial and other personal information of their clients or clients and their employees or other third parties and subjecting those agencies and corporations to potential fraudulent activity and their clients, clients and other third parties to identity theft and fraudulent activity in their credit card and banking accounts. Therefore, security breaches and cyber-attacks can cause significant increases in operating costs, including the costs and capital expenditures required to correct the deficiencies in and strengthen the security of data processing and storage systems.

Unfortunately, it is not always possible to anticipate, detect, or recognize these threats to our systems, or to implement effective preventative measures against all breaches, whether those breaches are malicious or accidental. Cybersecurity risks for banking organizations have significantly increased in recent years and have been difficult to detect before they occur because, among other reasons:

Although to date we have not experienced any losses or other material consequences relating to technology failure, cyber-attacks or other information, we may suffer such losses or other consequences in the future. While we invest in systems and processes that are designed to detect and prevent security breaches and cyber-attacks and we conduct periodic tests of our security systems and processes, we may not succeed in anticipating or adequately protecting against or preventing all security breaches and cyber-attacks from occurring. Even the most advanced internal control environment may be vulnerable to compromise. Targeted social engineering

attacks are becoming more sophisticated and are extremely difficult to prevent. Additionally, the existence of cyber-attacks or security breaches at third parties with access to our data, such as vendors, may not be disclosed to us in a timely manner. Further, we may not be able to insure against losses related to cyber threats. As cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities or incidents.

As is the case with non-electronic fraudulent activity, cyber-attacks or other information or security breaches, whether directed at us or third parties, may result in a material loss or have material consequences. Furthermore, the public perception that a cyber-attack on our systems has been successful, whether or not this perception is correct, may damage our reputation with customers and third parties with whom we do business. A successful penetration or circumvention of system security could cause us negative consequences, including loss of customers and business opportunities, disruption to our operations and business, misappropriation or destruction of our confidential information and/or that of our customers, or damage to our customers’ and/or third parties’ computers or systems, and could expose us to additional regulatory scrutiny and result in a violation of applicable privacy laws and other laws, litigation exposure, regulatory fines, penalties or intervention, loss of confidence in our security measures, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensatory costs, additional compliance costs, and could adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

We are dependent upon outside third parties for the processing and handling of our records and data.

We rely on software developed by third-party vendors to process various transactions. In some cases, we have contracted with third parties to run their proprietary software on our behalf. These systems include, but are not limited to, general ledger, payroll, employee benefits, loan and deposit processing and securities portfolio accounting. While we perform a review of controls instituted by the applicable vendors over these programs in accordance with industry standards and perform our own testing of user controls, we must rely on the continued maintenance of controls by these third-party vendors, including safeguards over the security of customer data. In addition, we maintain, or contract with third parties to maintain, daily backups of key processing outputs in the event of a failure on the part of any of these systems. Nonetheless, we may incur a temporary disruption in our ability to conduct business or process transactions, or incur damage to our reputation, if the third-party vendor fails to adequately maintain internal controls or institute necessary changes to systems. Such a disruption or breach of security may have a material adverse effect on our business.

We are subject to losses due to the errors or fraudulent behavior of employees or third parties.

We are exposed to many types of operational risk, including the risk of fraud by employees and outsiders, clerical record-keeping errors and transactional errors. Our business is dependent on our employees as well as third-party service providers to process a large number of increasingly complex transactions. We could be materially adversely affected if someone causes a significant operational breakdown or failure, either as a result of human error or where an individual purposefully sabotages or fraudulently manipulates our operations or systems. When we originate loans, we rely upon information supplied by loan applicants and third parties, including the information contained in the loan application, property appraisal and title information, if applicable, and employment and income documentation provided by third parties. If any of this information is misrepresented and such misrepresentation is not detected prior to loan funding, we generally bear the risk of loss associated with the misrepresentation. Any of these occurrences could result in a diminished ability of us to operate our business, potential liability to customers, reputational damage and regulatory intervention, which could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If our enterprise risk management framework is not effective at mitigating risk and loss to us, we could suffer unexpected losses and our results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Our enterprise risk management framework seeks to achieve an appropriate balance between risk and return, which is critical to optimizing stockholder value. We have established processes and procedures intended to identify, measure, monitor, report and analyze the types of risk to which we are subject, including credit, liquidity, operational, regulatory compliance and reputational. However, as with any risk management framework, there are inherent limitations to our risk management strategies as there may exist, or develop in the future, risks that we have not appropriately anticipated or identified. For example, the recent financial and credit crisis and resulting regulatory reform highlighted both the importance and some of the limitations of managing unanticipated risks. If our risk management framework proves ineffective, we could suffer unexpected losses and our business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Changes in accounting standards could materially impact our financial statements.

From time to time, the Financial Accounting Standards Board or the SEC may change the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of our financial statements. Such changes may result in us being subject to new or changing accounting and reporting standards. In addition, the bodies that interpret the accounting standards (such as banking regulators, outside auditors or management) may change their interpretations or positions on how these standards should be applied. These changes may

be beyond our control, can be hard to predict and can materially impact how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, we could be required to apply a new or revised standard retrospectively or apply an existing standard differently, also retrospectively, in each case resulting in our needing to revise or restate prior period financial statements.

If the goodwill that we have recorded or may record in connection with a business acquisition becomes impaired, it could require charges to earnings, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Goodwill represents the amount by which the cost of an acquisition exceeded the fair value of net assets we acquired in connection with the purchase of another financial institution. We review goodwill for impairment at least annually, or more frequently if a triggering event occurs which indicates that the carrying value of the asset might be impaired. There can be no assurance that our future evaluations of our existing goodwill or goodwill we may acquire in the future will not result in findings of impairment and related write-downs, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For additional information about the Company’s impairment assessment process and results see “NOTE 7 – GOODWILL AND CORE DEPOSIT INTANGIBLES” in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

We may be required to repurchase mortgage loans or indemnify buyers against losses in some circumstances, which could harm liquidity, results of operations and financial condition.

When mortgage loans are sold, whether as whole loans or pursuant to a securitization, we are required to make customary representations and warranties to purchasers, guarantors and insurers, including government-sponsored enterprises, about the mortgage loans and the manner in which they were originated. We may be required to repurchase or substitute mortgage loans, or indemnify buyers against losses, in the event we breach these representations or warranties. In addition, we may be required to repurchase mortgage loans as a result of early payment default of the borrower on a mortgage loan. With respect to loans that are originated through Equity Bank or correspondent channels, the remedies available against the originating broker or correspondent, if any, may not be as broad as the remedies available to purchasers, guarantors and insurers of mortgage loans against us. We face further risk that the originating broker or correspondent, if any, may not have financial capacity to perform remedies that otherwise may be available. Therefore, if a purchaser, guarantor or insurer enforces its remedies against us, we may not be able to recover losses from the originating broker or correspondent. If repurchase and indemnity demands increase and such demands are valid claims and are in excess of our provision for potential losses, our liquidity, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

We are subject to extensive regulation in the conduct of our business, which imposes additional costs on us and adversely affects our profitability.

As a bank holding company, we are subject to federal regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, or the BHC Act, and the examination and reporting requirements of the Federal Reserve. Federal regulation of the banking industry, along with tax and accounting laws, regulations, rules and standards, may limit our operations significantly and control the methods by which we conduct business, as they limit those of other banking organizations. Banking regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors, deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole and not stockholders or other creditors. These regulations affect lending practices, capital structure, investment practices, dividend policy and overall growth, among other things. For example, federal and state consumer protection laws and regulations limit the manner in which we may offer and extend credit. In addition, the laws governing bankruptcy generally favor debtors, making it more expensive and more difficult to collect from customers who become subject to bankruptcy proceedings.

We also may be required to invest significant management attention and resources to evaluate and make any changes necessary to comply with applicable laws and regulations, particularly as a result of regulations adopted under the Dodd-Frank Act. This allocation of resources, as well as any failure to comply with applicable requirements, may negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations.

Changes in laws, government regulation and monetary policy may have a material effect on our results of operations.

Financial institutions have been the subject of significant legislative and regulatory changes and may be the subject of further significant legislation or regulation in the future, none of which is within our control. New proposals for legislation continue to be introduced in the United States Congress that could further substantially increase regulation of the bank and non-bank financial services industries, impose restrictions on the operations and general ability of firms within the industry to conduct business consistent with historical practices, including in the areas of compensation, interest rates, financial product offerings and disclosures and have an effect on bankruptcy proceedings with respect to consumer residential real estate mortgages, among other things. Federal and state regulatory agencies also frequently adopt changes to their regulations or change the manner in which existing regulations are applied. Changes to statutes, regulations or regulatory policies, including changes in their interpretation or implementation by regulators, could affect us in substantial and unpredictable ways. Such changes could, among other things, subject us to additional costs and lower revenues, limit the types of financial services and products that we may offer, ease restrictions on non-banks and thereby enhance their ability to offer competing financial services and products, increase compliance costs and require a significant amount of management’s time and attention. Failure to comply with statutes, regulations or policies could result in sanctions by regulatory agencies, civil monetary penalties or reputational damage, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Banking agencies periodically conduct examinations of our business, including compliance with laws and regulations, and our failure to comply with any supervisory actions to which we become subject as a result of such examinations could materially and adversely affect us.

We are subject to supervision and regulation by federal and state banking agencies that periodically conduct examinations of our business, including compliance with laws and regulations – specifically, our subsidiary, Equity Bank, is subject to examination by the Federal Reserve and the OSBC and we are subject to examination by the Federal Reserve. Accommodating such examinations may require management to reallocate resources, which would otherwise be used in the day-to-day operation of other aspects of our business. If, as a result of an examination, any such banking agency was to determine that the financial condition, capital resources, allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses, asset quality, earnings prospects, management, liquidity or other aspects of our operations had become unsatisfactory, or that we or our management were in violation of any law or regulation, such banking agency may take a number of different remedial actions as it deems appropriate. These actions include the power to enjoin “unsafe or unsound” practices, to require affirmative actions to correct any conditions resulting from any violation or practice, to issue an administrative order that can be judicially enforced, to direct an increase in our capital, to restrict our growth, to assess civil monetary penalties against us, our officers, or directors, to remove officers and directors and, if it is concluded that such conditions cannot be corrected or there is an imminent risk of loss to depositors, to terminate our deposit insurance. If we become subject to such a regulatory action, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our banking subsidiary may be required to pay higher FDIC insurance premiums or special assessments which may adversely affect our earnings.

As a member institution of the FDIC, our banking subsidiary, Equity Bank, is assessed a quarterly deposit insurance premium. We are generally unable to control the amount of premiums or special assessments that Equity Bank is required to pay, future bank failures may stress the Deposit Insurance Fund and prompt the FDIC to increase its premiums or to issue special assessments. Any future changes in the calculation or assessment of FDIC insurance premiums may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and our ability to continue to pay dividends on our common stock at the current rate or at all.

Applicable regulations require us to maintain specific capital standards in relation to the respective credit risks of our assets and off-balance sheet exposures. Various components of these requirements are subject to qualitative judgments by regulators. We maintain a “well capitalized” status under the current regulatory framework. Our failure to maintain a “well capitalized” status could affect our customers’ confidence in us, which could adversely affect our ability to do business. In addition, failure to maintain such status could also result in restrictions imposed by our regulators on our growth and other activities. Any such effect on customers or restrictions by our regulators could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to stringent capital requirements, which may adversely impact our return on equity or constrain us from paying dividends or repurchasing shares.

Banking institutions are required to hold more capital as a percentage of assets than most industries. Holding high amounts of capital compresses our earnings and constrains growth. In addition, the failure to meet applicable regulatory capital requirements could result in one or more of our regulators placing limitations or conditions on our activities, including our growth initiatives, or restricting the commencement of new activities, and could affect client and investor confidence, our costs of funds and FDIC insurance costs and our ability to make acquisitions and result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

We may need to raise additional capital in the future, including as a result of potential increased minimum capital thresholds established by regulators, but that capital may not be available when it is needed or may be dilutive to stockholders.

We are required by federal and state regulatory authorities to maintain adequate capital levels to support our operations. New regulations implementing minimum capital standards could require financial institutions to maintain higher minimum capital ratios and may place a greater emphasis on common equity as a component of “Tier 1 capital,” which consists generally of stockholders’ equity and qualifying preferred stock, less certain goodwill items and other intangible assets. In order to support our operations and comply with regulatory standards, we may need to raise capital in the future. Our ability to raise additional capital will depend on conditions in the capital markets at that time, which are outside of our control, and on our financial performance. Accordingly, we cannot assure you of our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, on favorable terms. The capital and credit markets have experienced significant volatility in recent years. In some cases, the markets have produced downward pressure on stock prices and credit availability for certain issuers without regard to those issuers’ underlying financial strength. If we cannot raise additional capital when needed, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected and our banking regulators may subject us to regulatory enforcement action, including receivership. Furthermore, our issuance of additional shares of our Class A common stock could dilute the economic ownership interest of our Class A stockholders.

Stockholders may be deemed to be acting in concert or otherwise in control of us and our bank subsidiary, which could impose prior approval requirements and result in adverse regulatory consequences for such holders.

We are a bank holding company regulated by the Federal Reserve. Any entity (including a “group” composed of natural persons) owning 25% or more of a class of our outstanding shares of voting stock, or a lesser percentage if such holder or group otherwise exercises a “controlling influence” over us, may be subject to regulation as a “bank holding company” in accordance with the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. In addition, (i) any bank holding company or foreign bank with a U.S. presence is required to obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve under the Bank Holding Company Act to acquire or retain 5% or more of a class of our outstanding shares of voting stock, and (ii) any person other than a bank holding company may be required to obtain prior regulatory approval under the Change in Bank Control Act to acquire or retain 10% or more of our outstanding shares of voting stock. Any stockholder that is deemed to “control” the Company for bank regulatory purposes would become subject to prior approval requirements and ongoing regulation and supervision. Such a holder may be required to divest amounts equal to or exceeding 5% of the voting shares of investments that may be deemed incompatible with bank holding company status, such as an investment in a company engaged in non-financial activities. Regulatory determination of “control” of a depository institution or holding company is based on all of the relevant facts and circumstances. Potential investors are advised to consult with their legal counsel regarding the applicable regulations and requirements.

Shares of our common stock owned by holders determined by a bank regulatory agency to be acting in concert would be aggregated for purposes of determining whether those holders have control of a bank or bank holding company. Each stockholder obtaining control that is a “company” would be required to register as a bank holding company. “Acting in concert” generally means knowing participation in a joint activity or parallel action towards the common goal of acquiring control of a bank or a parent company, whether or not pursuant to an express agreement. The manner in which this definition is applied in individual circumstances can vary and cannot always be predicted with certainty. Many factors can lead to a finding of acting in concert, including where: (i) the stockholders are commonly controlled or managed; (ii) the stockholders are parties to an oral or written agreement or understanding regarding the acquisition, voting or transfer of control of voting securities of a bank or bank holding company; (iii) the stockholders are immediate family members; or (iv) both a stockholder and a controlling stockholder, partner, trustee or management official of such stockholder own equity in the bank or bank holding company.

We are subject to numerous laws designed to protect consumers, including the Community Reinvestment Act and fair lending laws, and failure to comply with these laws could lead to a wide variety of sanctions.

The Community Reinvestment Act, or CRA, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act and other fair lending laws and regulations impose nondiscriminatory lending requirements on financial institutions. The U.S. Department of Justice and other federal agencies are responsible for enforcing these laws and regulations. A successful regulatory challenge to an institution’s performance under the CRA or fair lending laws and regulations could result in a wide variety of sanctions, including damages and civil money penalties, injunctive relief, restrictions on mergers and acquisitions activity, restrictions on expansion and restrictions on entering new business lines. Private parties may also have the ability to challenge an institution’s performance under fair lending laws in private class action litigation. Such actions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

We are subject to the Bank Secrecy Act and other anti-money laundering statutes and regulations, and any deemed deficiency by us with respect to these laws could result in significant liability.

The Bank Secrecy Act, the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, or the Patriot Act, and other laws and regulations require financial institutions, among other duties, to institute and maintain an effective anti-money laundering program and file suspicious activity and currency transaction reports, when appropriate. In addition to other bank regulatory agencies, the federal Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Treasury, is authorized to impose significant civil money penalties for violations of those requirements and has recently engaged in coordinated enforcement efforts with the state and federal banking regulators, as well as the U.S. Department of Justice, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Drug Enforcement Administration and Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS. We are also subject to increased scrutiny of compliance with the rules enforced by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Treasury regarding, among other things, the prohibition of transacting business with and the need to freeze assets of, certain persons and organizations identified as a threat to the national security, foreign policy or economy of the United States. If our policies, procedures and systems are deemed deficient, we would be subject to liability, including fines and regulatory actions, which may include restrictions on our ability to pay dividends and the necessity to obtain regulatory approvals to proceed with certain aspects of our business plan, including our acquisition plans. Failure to maintain and implement adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist financing could also have serious reputational consequences for us. Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

Many of our new activities and expansion plans require regulatory approvals and failure to obtain them may restrict our growth.

We intend to complement and expand our business by pursuing strategic acquisitions of financial institutions and other complementary businesses. Generally, we must receive state and federal regulatory approval before we can acquire an FDIC-insured depository institution or related business. In determining whether to approve a proposed acquisition, federal banking regulators will consider, among other factors, the effect of the acquisition on competition, our financial condition, our future prospects and the impact of the proposal on U.S. financial stability. The regulators also review current and projected capital ratios and levels, the competence, experience and integrity of management and its record of compliance with laws and regulations, the convenience and needs of the communities to be served (including the acquiring institution’s record of compliance under the CRA) and the effectiveness of the acquiring institution in combating money laundering activities. Such regulatory approvals may not be granted on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. We may also be required to sell branches as a condition to receiving regulatory approval, which may not be acceptable to us or, if acceptable to us, may reduce the benefit of any acquisition.

The Federal Reserve may require us to commit capital resources to support our subsidiary, Equity Bank.

The Federal Reserve requires a bank holding company to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary banks and to commit resources to support its subsidiary banks. Under the “source of strength” doctrine, the Federal Reserve may require a bank holding company to make capital injections into a troubled subsidiary bank at times when the bank holding company may not be inclined to do so and may charge the bank holding company with engaging in unsafe and unsound practices for failure to commit resources to such a subsidiary bank. Accordingly, we could be required to provide financial assistance to our subsidiary, Equity Bank, if it experiences financial distress.

Such a capital injection may be required at a time when our resources are limited, and we may be required to borrow the funds to make the required capital injection. In the event of a bank holding company’s bankruptcy, the bankruptcy trustee will assume any commitment by the holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank. Moreover, bankruptcy law provides that claims based on any such commitment will be entitled to a priority of payment over the claims of the holding company’s general unsecured creditors, including the holders of any note obligations.

The laws that regulate our operations are designed for the protection of depositors and the public, not our stockholders.

The federal and state laws and regulations applicable to our operations give regulatory authorities extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement responsibilities and generally have been promulgated to protect depositors and the FDIC’s DIF and not for the purpose of protecting stockholders. These laws and regulations can materially affect our future business. Laws and regulations now affecting us may be changed at any time and the interpretation of such laws and regulations by bank regulatory authorities is also subject to change.

Any future constraints on liquidity at the holding company level could impair our ability to declare and pay dividends on our Class A common stock. In some instances, notice to, or approval from, the Federal Reserve may be required prior to our declaration or payment of dividends. Further, our operations are primarily conducted by our subsidiary, Equity Bank, which is subject to significant regulation. Federal and state banking laws restrict the payment of dividends by banks to their holding companies and Equity Bank will be subject to these restrictions in paying dividends to us. Because our ability to receive dividends or loans from Equity Bank is restricted, our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders is also restricted.

Additionally, the right of a bank holding company to participate in the assets of its subsidiary bank in the event of a bank-level liquidation or reorganization is subject to the claims of the bank’s creditors, including depositors, which take priority, except to the extent that the holding company may be a creditor with a recognized claim.

The market price of our Class A common stock may be subject to substantial fluctuations which may make it difficult for you to sell your shares at the volumes, prices and times desired.

The trading price of our Class A common stock may be volatile, which may make it difficult for you to resell your shares at the volume, prices and times desired. There are many factors that may impact the market price and trading volume of our Class A common stock, including:

The stock market and, in particular, the market for financial institution stocks, have experienced substantial fluctuations in recent years, which in many cases have been unrelated to the operating performance and prospects of particular companies. In addition, significant fluctuations in the trading volume in our Class A common stock may cause significant price variations to occur. Increased market volatility may materially and adversely affect the market price of our Class A common stock, which could make it difficult to sell your shares at the volume, prices and times desired.

In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of our common stock, securities class action litigation has been instituted. Pending or future securities class action suits against us could result in significant liabilities and, regardless of the outcome, could result in substantial costs and the diversion of our management’s attention and resources.

The obligations associated with being a public company require significant resources and management attention.

As a public company, we face increased legal, accounting, administrative and other costs and expenses that are not incurred by private companies, particularly now that we are no longer an emerging growth company. We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, which requires that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and financial condition and proxy and other information statements, and the rules and regulations implemented by the SEC, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, the PCAOB and the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC, each of which imposes additional reporting and other obligations on public companies. As a public company, we are required to:

We expect these rules and regulations and changes in laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, which have created uncertainty for public companies, to increase legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time consuming and costly. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. Our investment in compliance with existing and evolving regulatory requirements will result in increased administrative expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. These increased costs may require us to divert a significant amount of money that we could otherwise use to expand our business and achieve our strategic objectives

~~We have not historically declared~~There is no guarantee that we will declare or ~~paid~~pay cash dividends on our common stock and we do not expect to pay dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Consequently, your only opportunity to achieve a return on your investment is if the price of our Class A common stock appreciates.stock.

The holders of our common stock will receive dividends if and when declared by our board of directors out of legally available funds. ~~Our board of directors has not declared a dividend on our common stock since our inception.~~ Any future determination relating to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on a number of factors, including our future earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, future prospects, regulatory restrictions and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.

Our principal business operations are conducted through our subsidiary, Equity Bank. Cash available to pay dividends to our stockholders is derived primarily, if not entirely, from dividends paid by Equity Bank to us. The ability of Equity Bank to pay dividends to us, as well as our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders, will continue to be subject to and limited by, certain legal and regulatory restrictions. Further, any lenders making loans to us may impose financial covenants that may be more restrictive with respect to dividend payments than the regulatory requirements.

If a substantial number of shares become available for sale and are sold in a short period of time, the market price of our Class A common stock could decline.

If our existing stockholders sell substantial amounts of our Class A common stock in the public market, the market price of our Class A common stock could decrease significantly. The perception in the public market that our existing stockholders might sell shares of Class A common stock could also depress our market price. A decline in the price of shares of our Class A common stock

might impede our ability to raise capital through the issuance of additional shares of our Class A common stock or other equity securities and could result in a decline in the value of the shares of our Class A common stock.

Securities analysts may not initiate or continue coverage on our Class A common stock, which could adversely affect the market for our Class A common stock.

The trading market for our Class A common stock may depend in part on the research and reports that securities analysts publish about us and our business. We do not have any control over these securities analysts, and they may not cover our Class A common stock. If securities analysts do not cover our Class A common stock, the lack of research coverage may adversely affect our market price. If we are covered by securities analysts and our Class A common stock is the subject of an unfavorable report, the price of our Class A common stock may decline. If one or more of these analysts cease to cover us or fail to publish regular reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause the price or trading volume of our Class A common stock to decline.

The trading volume in our common stock is less than other larger financial institutions.

Although our Class A common stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, the trading volume in our common stock is less than that of other, larger financial services companies. A public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends on the presence in the marketplace of willing buyers and sellers of our Class A common stock at any given time. This presence depends on the individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over which we have no control. Given the lower trading volume of our Class A common stock, significant sales of our Class A common stock or the expectation of these sales, could cause the price of our Class A common stock to decline.

Use of our common stock for future acquisitions or to raise capital may be dilutive to existing stockholders.

When we determine that appropriate strategic opportunities exist, we may acquire other financial institutions and related businesses, subject to applicable regulatory requirements. We may use our common stock for such acquisitions. We may also seek to raise capital for such acquisitions through selling additional common stock. It is possible that the issuance of additional common stock in such acquisitions or capital transactions may be dilutive to the interests of our existing stockholders.

We may sell additional shares of Class A common stock, or securities convertible into or exchangeable for such shares, in subsequent public or private offerings. Future issuance of any new shares could cause further dilution in the value of our outstanding shares of Class A common stock. We cannot predict the size of future issuances of our Class A common stock, or securities convertible into or exchangeable for such shares, or the effect, if any, that future issuances and sales of shares of our Class A common stock will have on the market price of our Class A common stock. Sales of substantial amounts of our Class A common stock (including shares issued in connection with an acquisition), or the perception that such sales could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices of our Class A common stock.

We have significant institutional investors whose interests may differ from yours.

A significant portion of our outstanding equity is currently held by various investment funds. These funds could have a significant level of influence because of their level of ownership and representation on our board of directors, including a greater ability than you and our other stockholders to influence the election of directors and the potential outcome of other matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders, such as mergers, the sale of substantially all of our assets and other extraordinary corporate matters and affect the votes of our board of directors. These funds also have certain rights, such as access rights and registration rights that our other stockholders do not have. The interests of these funds could conflict with the interests of our other stockholders, including you, and any future transfer by these funds of their shares of Class A common stock to other investors who have different business objectives could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects, and the market value of our Class A common stock.

Our directors and executive officers beneficially own a significant portion of our Class A common stock and have substantial influence over us.

Our directors and executive officers, as a group, beneficially own a significant portion of our Class A common stock. As a result of this beneficial ownership, our directors and executive officers have the ability, by taking coordinated action, to exercise significant influence over our affairs and policies. The interests of our directors and executive officers may not be consistent with your interests as a stockholder. This influence may also have the effect of delaying or preventing changes of control, or changes in

management or limiting the ability of our other stockholders to approve transactions that they may deem to be in the best interests of our Company.

Shares of our Class A common stock are not savings or deposit accounts and are not insured by the FDIC’s DIF or any other agency or private entity. Such shares are subject to investment risk, including the possible loss of some or all of the value of your investment.

We have the ability to incur debt and pledge our assets, including our stock in Equity Bank, to secure that debt, and holders of any such debt obligations will generally have priority over holders of our Class A common stock with respect to certain payment obligations.

We have the ability to incur debt and pledge our assets to secure that debt. Absent special and unusual circumstances, a holder of indebtedness for borrowed money has rights that are superior to those of holders of Class A common stock. For example, interest must be paid to the lender before dividends can be paid to stockholders and loans must be paid off before any assets can be distributed to stockholders if we were to liquidate. Furthermore, we would have to make principal and interest payments on our indebtedness, which could reduce our profitability or result in net losses on a consolidated basis.

If we fail to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and for evaluating and reporting on that system of internal control. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Ensuring that we have adequate disclosure controls and procedures in place, including internal control over financial reporting, so that we can produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis is costly and time-consuming and needs to be reevaluated frequently. As a public company, we are required to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other rules that govern public companies. Our management is required to certify our compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and to make annual assessments of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm is required to report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

Our management may conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective due to our failure to cure any identified material weakness or otherwise. Moreover, even if our management concludes that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, our independent registered public accounting firm may not conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is effective. In the future, our independent registered public accounting firm may not be satisfied with our internal control over financial reporting or the level at which our controls are documented, designed, operated or reviewed, or it may interpret the relevant requirements differently from us. In addition, during the course of the evaluation, documentation and testing of our internal control over financial reporting, we may identify deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting or disclosure controls. Any such deficiencies may also subject us to adverse regulatory consequences. If we fail to achieve and maintain the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting or disclosure controls, as these standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may be unable to report our financial information on a timely basis, we may not be able to conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting or disclosure controls and we may suffer adverse regulatory consequences or violations of listing standards. There could also be a negative reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements.

Our corporate governance documents and certain corporate and banking laws applicable to us could make a takeover more difficult.

Certain provisions of our Articles of Incorporation and our Bylaws and applicable corporate and federal banking laws, could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us or conduct a proxy contest, even if those events were perceived by many of our stockholders as beneficial to their interests. These provisions and the corporate and banking laws and regulations applicable to us, among others:

These provisions may discourage potential acquisition proposals and could delay or prevent a change in control, including under circumstances in which our stockholders might otherwise receive a premium over the market price of our shares.

Our board of directors may issue shares of preferred stock that would adversely affect the rights of our Class A common stockholders.

Our authorized capital stock includes 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock of which none were issued and outstanding as of March 9, ~~2021.~~2022. Our board of directors, in its sole discretion, may designate and issue one or more series of preferred stock from the authorized and unissued shares of preferred stock. Subject to limitations imposed by law or our Articles of Incorporation, our board of directors is empowered to determine:

We could issue preferred stock with voting and conversion rights that could adversely affect the voting power of the shares of our Class A common stock and with preferences over our Class A common stock with respect to dividends and in liquidation.

We cannot provide any assurance that an investor in our Class A common stock will realize a substantial return on his or her investment, or any return at all. Further, as a result of the uncertainty and risks associated with our operations, many of which are described in this “Item 1A—Risk Factors” section, it is possible that an investor could lose his or her entire investment.

We operate in a highly competitive industry and face significant competition from other financial institutions and financial services providers that could decrease our growth or profits.

Consumer and commercial banking are highly competitive industries. Our market areas contain not only a large number of community and regional banks, but also a significant presence of the country’s largest commercial banks. We compete with other state and national financial institutions, as well as savings and loan associations, savings banks and credit unions, for deposits and loans. In addition, we compete with financial intermediaries, such as consumer finance companies, commercial finance companies, mortgage banking companies, insurance companies, securities firms, mutual funds and several government agencies, as well as major retailers, all actively engaged in providing various types of loans and other financial services. Some of these competitors may have a long history of successful operations in our market areas and greater ties to local businesses and more expansive banking relationships, as well as more established depositor bases, fewer regulatory constraints and lower cost structures than we do. Competitors with greater resources may possess an advantage through their ability to maintain numerous banking locations in more convenient sites, to conduct more extensive promotional and advertising campaigns or to operate a more developed technology platform. Due to their size, many competitors may offer a broader range of products and services, as well as better pricing for certain products and services than we can offer. For example, in the current low interest rate environment, competitors with lower costs of capital may solicit our customers to refinance their loans with a lower interest rate. Further, increased competition among financial services companies due to the recent consolidation of certain competing financial institutions may adversely affect our ability to market our products and services. Technology has lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for banks to compete in our market areas without a retail footprint by offering competitive rates and for non-banks to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks.

The financial services industry could become even more competitive as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and continued consolidation. Banks, securities firms and insurance companies can merge under the umbrella of a financial holding company, which can offer virtually any type of financial service, including banking, securities underwriting, insurance (both agency and underwriting) and merchant banking.

Failure to perform in any of these areas could significantly weaken our competitive position, which could adversely affect our growth and profitability, which, in turn, could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

As a community bank, our ability to maintain our reputation is critical to the success of our business, and the failure to do so may materially adversely affect our performance.

We are a community bank and our reputation is one of the most valuable components of our business. As such, we strive to conduct our business in a manner that enhances our reputation. This is done, in part, by recruiting, hiring and retaining employees who share our core values of being an integral part of the communities we serve, delivering superior service to our customers and caring about our customers and associates. If our reputation is negatively affected by the actions of our employees or otherwise, our business and therefore, our operating results may be materially adversely affected. Further, negative public opinion can expose us to litigation and regulatory action as we seek to implement our growth strategy.

Because a significant portion of our loan portfolio is secured by real property, we may foreclose upon and take title to such property in the ordinary course of business. If hazardous substances are found on such property, we could be liable for remediation costs, as well as for personal injury and property damage. Environmental laws might require us to incur substantial expenses, materially reduce the property’s value or limit our ability to use or sell the property. Although management has policies requiring environmental reviews before loans secured by real property are made and before foreclosure is commenced, it is still possible that environmental risks might not be detected and that the associated costs might have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Adverse weather or man-made events could negatively affect our markets or disrupt our operations, which could have an adverse effect upon our business and results of operations.

A significant portion of our business is generated in our Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma markets, which have been, and may continue to be, susceptible to natural disasters, such as tornadoes, droughts, floods and other severe weather events. These natural disasters could negatively impact regional economic conditions, cause a decline in the value or destruction of mortgaged properties and increase the risk of delinquencies, foreclosures or loss on loans originated by us, damage our banking facilities and offices and negatively impact our growth strategy. Such weather events could disrupt operations, result in damage to properties and negatively affect the local economies in the markets where we operate. We cannot predict whether, or to what extent, damage that may be caused by future weather or man-made events will affect our operations or the economies in our current or future market areas, but such events could negatively impact economic conditions in these regions and result in a decline in local loan demand and loan originations, a decline in the value or destruction of properties securing our loans and an increase in delinquencies, foreclosures or ~~loan~~credit losses. Our business or results of operations may be adversely affected by these and other negative effects of natural or man-made disasters. Further, severe weather, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism and other external events could adversely affect us in a number of ways, including an increase in delinquencies, bankruptcies or defaults that could result in a higher level of nonperforming assets, net charge-offs and provision for ~~loan~~credit losses. Such risks could also impair the value of collateral securing loans and hurt our deposit base.

We are or may become involved from time to time in suits, legal proceedings, information-gathering requests, investigations and proceedings by governmental and self-regulatory agencies that may lead to adverse consequences.

Many aspects of our business involve substantial risk of legal liability. We have been named or threatened to be named as defendants in various lawsuits arising from our business activities (and in some cases from the activities of companies that we have acquired) including, but not limited to, consumer residential real estate mortgages. In addition, from time to time, we are, or may

become, the subject of governmental and self-regulatory agency information-gathering requests, reviews, investigations and proceedings and other forms of regulatory inquiry, including by bank regulatory agencies, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the SEC and law enforcement authorities. The results of such proceedings could lead to significant civil or criminal penalties, including monetary penalties, damages, adverse judgments, settlements, fines, injunctions, restrictions on the way in which we conduct our business or reputational harm.

We rely on technology companies to provide information technology products and services necessary to support our day-to-day operations. Technology companies frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of patent infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. In addition, patent holding companies seek to monetize patents they have purchased or otherwise obtained. Competitors of our vendors, or other individuals or companies, have from time to time claimed to hold intellectual property sold to us by its vendors. Such claims may increase in the future as the financial services sector becomes more reliant on information technology vendors. The plaintiffs in these actions frequently seek injunctions and substantial damages.

Regardless of the scope or validity of such patents or other intellectual property rights, or the merits of any claims by potential or actual litigants, we may have to engage in litigation that could be expensive, time-consuming, disruptive to our operations and distracting to management. If we are found to infringe one or more patents or other intellectual property rights, we may be required to pay substantial damages or royalties to a third-party. In certain cases, we may consider entering into licensing agreements for disputed intellectual property, although no assurance can be given that such licenses can be obtained on acceptable terms or that litigation will not occur. These licenses may also significantly increase our operating expenses. If legal matters related to intellectual property claims were resolved against us or settled, we could be required to make payments in amounts that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We have pledged all of the stock of Equity Bank as collateral for a loan, and if the lender forecloses, you could lose your investment.

We have pledged all of the stock of Equity Bank as collateral for a third-party loan, which had no balance as of December 31, ~~2020.~~2021. This loan has a maximum lending commitment of $40.0 million. This loan was renewed subsequent to December 31, 2021, that set a new maturity date of February 11, 2023, and decreased the loan commitment amount from $40.0 million to $25.0 million. If we were to default on this indebtedness, the lender of such loan could foreclose on Equity Bank’s stock and we would lose our principal asset. In that event, if the value of Equity Bank’s stock is less than the amount of the indebtedness, you would lose the entire amount of your investment.

We have outstanding subordinated debt obligations, and if the Company defaults on those obligations, the debt holders could lose their investment.

In the event of default, the Company’s senior debt holders will be entitled to receive payment in full prior to payment of subordinated debt holders. If the company’s distributable assets in the event of default can only repay the senior debt holders the subordinated debt holders could lose their investment.

Our principal executive offices are located at 7701 East Kellogg Drive, Wichita, Kansas 67207. Including our principal executive offices, as of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, we operated a total of 5169 branches, consisting of ~~four~~seven branches in the Wichita, Kansas metropolitan area, seven branches in the Kansas City metropolitan area, three branches in Topeka, Kansas, ~~eight~~eleven branches in Western Missouri, seven branches in Western Kansas, four branches in Southeast Kansas, seven branches in Southwest Kansas, five branches in ~~Southwest~~Central Kansas, five branches in North Central Kansas, five branches in Northern Arkansas, one branch in the Tulsa, Oklahoma metropolitan area, five branches in Northern Oklahoma and two branches in Western Oklahoma. Most of Equity Bank’s branches are equipped with automated teller machines and drive-through facilities. We believe all of our facilities are suitable for our operational needs. The following table summarizes pertinent details of our principal executive offices and branches, as of December 31, ~~2020.~~2021.

⁽¹⁾The building at this location is owned but the land is on a long term lease expiring in January 2030.

From time to time we are party to various litigation matters incidental to the conduct of our business. See “NOTE 23 – LEGAL MATTERS” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a complete discussion of litigation matters.

Item 5: Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Markets under the symbol “EQBK”. At February 28, ~~2021,~~2022, there were ~~14,448,847~~16,660,372 shares of our Class A common stock, outstanding and ~~237~~310 stockholders of record for the Company’s Class A common stock. At February 28, ~~2021,~~2022, no shares of our Class B common stock were outstanding.

We have not historically declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. Instead, we anticipate that all of our future earnings will be retained to support our operations and to finance the growth and development of our business. AnyOur future determination to pay dividends on our common stock will be made by our board of directors and will depend on a number of factors, including:

As a Kansas corporation, we are subject to certain restrictions on dividends under the Kansas General Corporation Code. Generally, a Kansas corporation may pay dividends to its stockholders out of its surplus or, if there is no surplus, out of its net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared or the preceding fiscal year, or both. In addition, if the capital of a Kansas corporation is diminished by depreciation in the value of its property, or by losses or otherwise, to an amount less than the aggregate amount of the capital represented by the issued and outstanding stock of all classes having a preference upon the distribution of assets, the directors of such corporation cannot declare and pay out of such net profits any dividends upon any shares of any classes of its capital stock until the deficiency in the amount of capital represented by the issued and outstanding stock of all classes having a preference upon the distribution of assets is repaired. We are also subject to certain restrictions on the payment of cash dividends as a result of banking laws, regulations and policies. For more information, see “Item 1 – Supervision and Regulation – Banking Regulation – Standards for Safety and Soundness.”

Since we are a bank holding company and do not engage directly in business activities of a material nature, our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders depends, in large part, upon our receipt of dividends from Equity Bank, which is also subject to numerous limitations on the payment of dividends under federal and state banking laws, regulations and policies. The present and future dividend policy of Equity Bank is subject to the discretion of its board of directors. Equity Bank is not obligated to pay dividends. At December 31, 2020, Equity Bank has a negative retained earnings balance, primarily due to a goodwill impairment charge recorded during 2020, which would require Equity Bank to obtain regulatory approval to pay a dividend up to the bank holding company.

If Equity Bank is “significantly undercapitalized” under the applicable federal bank capital standards, or if Equity Bank is “undercapitalized” and has failed to submit an acceptable capital restoration plan or has materially failed to implement such a plan, the FDIC may choose to require Equity Bank to receive prior approval from the Federal Reserve for any capital distribution. In addition, Equity Bank generally is prohibited from making a capital distribution if such distribution would cause Equity Bank to be “undercapitalized” under applicable federal bank capital standards. For more information, see “Item 7 – Supervision and Regulation – Banking Regulation – Standards for Safety and Soundness.”

The following table presents shares of our common stock that may be issued with respect to compensation plans at December 31, ~~2020.~~2021.

Plan category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)		Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column a) (c)		Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)		Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column a) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders - stock options		601,333	$	25.61	*			478,841	$	26.08	*
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders - restricted stock units		261,078		—	*			287,737		—	*
Total Equity compensation plans available under the Amended and Restated 2013 Stock Incentive Plan		862,411				497,501		766,578				420,985
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders - employee stock purchase plan		—		—		446,186		—		—		412,531
Total Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		862,411				943,687		766,578				833,516
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders⁽¹⁾		150,000		12.00	—		—		—		—
Total		1,012,411	$	22.89		943,687		766,578	$	26.08		833,516

The following performance graph compares total stockholders’ return on the Company’s common stock for the period beginning at the close of trading ~~November 11, 2015~~December 31, 2016 to December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, with the cumulative total return of the NASDAQ Composite Index and the NASDAQ Bank Index for the same period. Cumulative total return is computed by dividing the difference between the Company’s share price at the end and the beginning of the measurement period by the share price at the beginning of the measurement ~~period.~~period, including reinvestment of dividends. The performance graph assumes $100 is invested on ~~November 11, 2015,~~December 31, 2016, in the Company’s common stock, the NASDAQ Composite Index and the NASDAQ Bank Index. Historical stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

On October 20, 2021, the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City advised the Company that it had no objection to the Company’s authorization of its repurchase of up to an additional 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s Class A Voting Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, from time to time, beginning October 30, 2021, and concluding October 29, 2022.

On October 22, 2020, the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City advised the Company that it had no objection to the Company’s authorization of its repurchase of up to an additional 800,000 shares of the Company’s Class A Voting Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, from time to time, beginning October 30, 2020, and concluding October 29, 2021.

The following table presents shares that were repurchased under ~~this program.~~

~~The following table sets forth selected historical consolidated financial and other data as~~the repurchase program during the fourth quarter of and for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017 and 2016. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of any future period. The performance and certain capital ratios are unaudited and derived from our audited and unaudited financial statements as of and for the periods presented. Average balances have been calculated using daily averages, unless otherwise denoted.

You should read the selected consolidated financial data set forth below in conjunction with “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

~~Selected Financial Data for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) is listed below.~~2021.

Years Ended December 31,

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

Statement of Income Data

Interest and dividend income

$
155,561

$
175,499

$
161,556

$
102,693

$
61,799

Interest expense

22,909

49,641

36,758

16,691

9,202

Net interest income

132,652

125,858

124,798

86,002

52,597

Provision for loan losses

24,255

18,354

3,961

2,953

2,119

Net gain on acquisition

2,145

—

—

—

—

Net gain (loss) from securities transactions

11

14

(9
)

271

479

Other non-interest income

23,867

24,974

19,734

15,169

9,987

Merger expense

299

915

7,462

5,352

5,294

Goodwill impairment

104,831

—

—

—

—

Loss on extinguishment of debt

—

—

—

—

58

Other non-interest expense

103,860

98,720

86,925

62,111

41,723

Income (loss) before income taxes

(74,570
)

32,857

46,175

31,026

13,869

Provision for income taxes

400

7,278

10,350

10,377

4,495

Net income (loss)

(74,970
)

25,579

35,825

20,649

9,374

Dividends and discount accretion on preferred stock

—

—

—

—

(1
)
Net income (loss) allocable to common stockholders

(74,970
)

25,579

35,825

20,649

9,373

Basic earnings (loss) per share

(4.97
)

1.64

2.33

1.66

1.09

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

(4.97
)

1.61

2.28

1.62

1.07

Balance Sheet Data (at period end)

Cash and cash equivalents

$
280,698

$
89,291

$
192,818

$
52,195

$
35,095

Securities available-for-sale

871,827

142,067

168,875

162,272

95,732

Securities held-to-maturity

—

769,059

748,356

535,462

465,709

Loans held for sale

12,394

5,933

2,972

2,353

4,830

Gross loans held for investment

2,591,696

2,556,652

2,575,408

2,117,270

1,383,605

Allowance for loan losses

33,709

12,232

11,454

8,498

6,432

Loans held for investment, net of allowance for loan losses

2,557,987

2,544,420

2,563,954

2,108,772

1,377,173

Goodwill and core deposit intangibles, net

47,658

156,339

153,437

115,645

63,589

Mortgage servicing asset, net

—

5

11

17

23

Naming rights, net

1,130

1,174

1,217

1,260

—

Total assets

4,013,356

3,949,578

4,061,716

3,170,509

2,192,192

Total deposits

3,447,590

3,063,516

3,123,447

2,382,013

1,630,451

Borrowings

133,857

383,632

464,676

401,652

293,909

Total liabilities

3,605,707

3,471,518

3,605,775

2,796,365

1,934,228

Total stockholders’ equity

407,649

478,060

455,941

374,144

257,964

Tangible common equity^*

358,861

320,542

301,276

257,222

194,352

Performance ratios

Return on average assets (ROAA)

(1.87
%)

0.64
%

1.00
%

0.84
%

0.55
%
Return on average equity (ROAE)

(16.14
%)

5.52
%

8.52
%

7.03
%

5.55
%
Return on average tangible common equity (ROATCE)^*

(21.51
%)

9.22
%

13.43
%

9.81
%

6.75
%
Yield on loans

5.00
%

5.73
%

5.74
%

5.43
%

4.98
%
Cost of interest-bearing deposits

0.66
%

1.53
%

1.15
%

0.79
%

0.65
%
Net interest margin

3.63
%

3.48
%

3.81
%

3.83
%

3.30
%
Efficiency ratio^*

66.36
%

65.45
%

60.14
%

61.39
%

66.67
%
Non-interest income / average assets

0.65
%

0.63
%

0.55
%

0.63
%

0.61
%
Non-interest expense / average assets

5.23
%

2.50
%

2.62
%

2.74
%

2.74
%
Capital Ratios

Tier 1 Leverage Ratio

9.30
%

9.02
%

8.60
%

10.33
%

11.81
%
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Ratio

12.82
%

11.63
%

10.95
%

11.53
%

13.38
%
Tier 1 Risk Based Capital Ratio

13.37
%

12.15
%

11.45
%

12.14
%

14.28
%
Total Risk Based Capital Ratio

17.35
%

12.59
%

11.86
%

12.51
%

14.71
%
Equity / Assets

10.16
%

12.10
%

11.23
%

11.80
%

11.77
%
Book value per share

$
28.04

$
30.95

$
28.87

$
25.62

$
22.09

Tangible book value per share^*

$
24.68

$
20.75

$
19.08

$
17.61

$
16.64

Tangible common equity to tangible assets^*

9.05
%

8.45
%

7.71
%

8.42
%

9.13
%

	Plan beginning October 30, 2021 to October 29, 2022
Period		Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Repurchase Plan		Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan
October 1, 2021 through October 31, 2021			—	$	-		—		1,000,000
November 1, 2021 through November 30, 2021			—		—		—		1,000,000
December 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021			132,873		32.99		132,873		867,127
Total			132,873	$	32.99		132,873		867,127

	Plan beginning October 30, 2020 to October 29, 2021
Period		Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Repurchase Plan		Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan
October 1, 2021 through October 31, 2021			719	$	33.02		719		—
November 1, 2021 through November 30, 2021			—		—		—		—
December 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021			—		—		—		—
Total			719	$	33.02		719		—

	Total repurchase program
Period		Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Repurchase Plan		Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan
October 1, 2021 through October 31, 2021			719	$	33.02		719		1,000,000
November 1, 2021 through November 30, 2021			—		—		—		1,000,000
December 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021			132,873		32.99		132,873		867,127
Total			133,592	$	32.99		133,592		867,127

Indicates non-GAAP financial measure. Please see “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measure.

Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following discussion contains “forward-looking statements” that reflect our future plans, estimates, beliefs and expected performance. We caution that assumptions, expectations, projections, intentions or beliefs about future events may, and often do, vary from actual results and the differences can be material. See “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” Also, see the risk factors and other cautionary statements described under the heading “Item 1A – Risk Factors” included in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements except as otherwise required by applicable law.

This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operation includes the following sections:

	Years Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2021			2020			2019			2018			2017
Statement of Income Data
Interest and dividend income	$	157,368		$	155,561		$	175,499		$	161,556		$	102,693
Interest expense		14,789			22,909			49,641			36,758			16,691
Net interest income		142,579			132,652			125,858			124,798			86,002
Provision for credit losses		(8,480	)		24,255			18,354			3,961			2,953
Net gain on acquisition		585			2,145		—			—			—
Net gain (loss) from securities transactions		406			11			14			(9	)		271
Other non-interest income		31,851			23,867			24,974			19,734			15,169
Merger expense		9,189			299			915			7,462			5,352
Goodwill impairment	—				104,831		—			—			—
Loss on extinguishment of debt		372		—			—			—			—
Other non-interest expense		109,904			103,860			98,720			86,925			62,111
Income (loss) before income taxes		64,436			(74,570	)		32,857			46,175			31,026
Provision for income taxes		11,956			400			7,278			10,350			10,377
Net income (loss)		52,480			(74,970	)		25,579			35,825			20,649
Net income (loss) allocable to common stockholders		52,480			(74,970	)		25,579			35,825			20,649
Basic earnings (loss) per share		3.49			(4.97	)		1.64			2.33			1.66
Diluted earnings (loss) per share		3.43			(4.97	)		1.61			2.28			1.62
Balance Sheet Data (at period end)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	259,954		$	280,698		$	89,291		$	192,818		$	52,195
Securities available-for-sale		1,327,442			871,827			142,067			168,875			162,272
Securities held-to-maturity	—			—				769,059			748,356			535,462
Loans held for sale		4,214			12,394			5,933			2,972			2,353
Gross loans held for investment		3,155,627			2,591,696			2,556,652			2,575,408			2,117,270
Allowance for credit losses		48,365			33,709			12,232			11,454			8,498
Loans held for investment, net of allowance for credit losses		3,107,262			2,557,987			2,544,420			2,563,954			2,108,772
Goodwill and core deposit intangibles, net		69,344			47,658			156,339			153,437			115,645
Mortgage servicing asset, net		276		—				5			11			17
Naming rights, net		1,087			1,130			1,174			1,217			1,260
Total assets		5,137,631			4,013,356			3,949,578			4,061,716			3,170,509
Total deposits		4,420,004			3,447,590			3,063,516			3,123,447			2,382,013
Borrowings		151,891			133,857			383,632			464,676			401,652
Total liabilities		4,637,000			3,605,707			3,471,518			3,605,775			2,796,365
Total stockholders’ equity		500,631			407,649			478,060			455,941			374,144
Tangible common equity^*		429,924			358,861			320,542			301,276			257,222
Performance ratios
Return on average assets (ROAA)		1.18	%		(1.87	%)		0.64	%		1.00	%		0.84	%
Return on average equity (ROAE)		11.75	%		(16.14	%)		5.52	%		8.52	%		7.03	%
Return on average tangible common equity (ROATCE)^*		14.10	%		(21.51	%)		9.22	%		13.43	%		9.81	%
Yield on loans		4.77	%		5.00	%		5.73	%		5.74	%		5.43	%
Cost of interest-bearing deposits		0.30	%		0.66	%		1.53	%		1.15	%		0.79	%
Net interest margin		3.44	%		3.63	%		3.48	%		3.81	%		3.83	%
Efficiency ratio^*		63.01	%		66.36	%		65.45	%		60.14	%		61.39	%
Non-interest income / average assets		0.74	%		0.65	%		0.63	%		0.55	%		0.63	%
Non-interest expense / average assets		2.70	%		5.23	%		2.50	%		2.62	%		2.74	%
Dividend payout ratio		4.84	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%
Capital Ratios
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio		9.09	%		9.30	%		9.02	%		8.60	%		10.33	%
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Ratio		12.03	%		12.82	%		11.63	%		10.95	%		11.53	%
Tier 1 Risk Based Capital Ratio		12.67	%		13.37	%		12.15	%		11.45	%		12.14	%
Total Risk Based Capital Ratio		15.96	%		17.35	%		12.59	%		11.86	%		12.51	%
Equity / Assets		9.74	%		10.16	%		12.10	%		11.23	%		11.80	%
Book value per share	$	29.87		$	28.04		$	30.95		$	28.87		$	25.62
Tangible book value per share^*	$	25.65		$	24.68		$	20.75		$	19.08		$	17.61
Tangible common equity to tangible assets^*		8.48	%		9.05	%		8.45	%		7.71	%		8.42	%

* Indicates non-GAAP financial measure. Please see “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measure.

We are a bank holding company headquartered in Wichita, Kansas. Our wholly-owned banking subsidiary, Equity Bank, provides a broad range of financial services primarily to businesses and business owners as well as individuals through our network of 5169 full-service branches located in Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma. As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, we had, on a consolidated basis, total assets of ~~$4.01~~$5.14 billion, total deposits of ~~$3.45~~$4.42 billion, total loans held for investment, net of allowances, of ~~$2.56~~$3.11 billion and total stockholders’ equity of ~~$407.6~~$500.6 million. ~~Primarily~~Net income for the year ended December 31, 2021, was $52.5 million, compared to a net loss of $75.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily due to a goodwill impairment charge of $104.8 million during the third quarter of ~~2020, net loss for the year ended December 31, 2020, was $75.0 million compared to net income of $25.6 million for the prior year ended December 31, 2019.~~2020.

From 2003 through ~~2020,~~2021, we completed a series of ~~eighteen~~twenty acquisitions and two charter consolidations. We seek to integrate the banks we acquire into our existing operational platform and enhance stockholder value through the creation of efficiencies within the combined operations. In conjunction with our strategic acquisition growth, we strive to reposition and improve the loan portfolio and deposit mix of the banks we acquire. Following our acquisitions, we focus on identifying and disposing of problematic loans and replacing them with higher quality loans generated organically. In addition, we concentrate on growth in our commercial loan portfolio, which we believe generally offers higher return opportunities than our consumer loan portfolio, primarily by hiring additional talented bankers, particularly in our metropolitan markets, and incentivizing our bankers to expand their commercial banking relationships. We also seek to increase our most attractive deposit accounts primarily by growing deposits in our community markets and cross selling our depository products to our loan customers.

Our principal objective is to continually increase stockholder value and generate consistent earnings growth by expanding our commercial banking franchise both organically and through strategic acquisitions. We believe our strategy of selectively acquiring and integrating community banks has provided us with economies of scale and improved our overall franchise efficiency. We expect to continue to pursue strategic acquisitions and believe our targeted market areas present us with many and varied acquisition opportunities. We are also focused on continuing to grow organically and believe the markets in which we operate currently provide meaningful opportunities to expand our commercial customer base and increase our current market share. We believe our geographic footprint, which is strategically split between growing metropolitan markets, such as Kansas City, Tulsa and Wichita, and stable community markets within Western Kansas, Western Missouri, Topeka, Northern Arkansas and Northern Oklahoma, provides us with access to low cost stable core deposits in community markets that we can use to fund commercial loan growth in our metropolitan markets. We strive to provide an enhanced banking experience for our customers by providing them with a comprehensive suite of sophisticated banking products and services tailored to meet their needs, while delivering the high-quality relationship-based customer service of a community bank.

We completed our merger with ASBI of Wichita, Kansas on October 1, 2021. ASBI had total assets of $777.6 million, net loans of $441.9 million and total deposits of $668.8 million. Also, on December 3, 2021, we completed our purchase of assets and assumption of deposits and certain other liabilities of ~~Almena State~~three branches in St. Joseph, Missouri, from Security Bank ~~(“Almena”), facilitated by the FDIC, consisting~~ of ~~one branch location in Norton,~~ Kansas ~~and one branch location in Almena, Kansas, on October 23, 2020.~~City (“Security”). At closing, ~~this transaction included~~the Security branches had total assets of ~~$66.9~~$75.8 million, net loans of ~~$31.4~~$1.4 million and total deposits of ~~$62.5~~$75.1 million.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused economic and social disruption on an unprecedented scale. While some industries have been impacted more severely than others, all businesses have been impacted to some degree. This disruption ~~has~~ resulted in the shuttering

of businesses across the country, significant job loss and aggressive measures by federal, state and local ~~government.~~government during the year ended December 31, 2020. Throughout the year ended December 31, 2021, the economy has opened significantly compared to 2020; however, certain measures from governing authorities are still in place and continue to impact operations.

Congress, the President and the Federal Reserve have taken several actions designed to cushion the economic fallout. Most notably, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) was signed into law on March 27, 2020, as a $2 trillion legislative package. The goal of the CARES Act is to prevent a severe economic downturn through various measures, including direct financial aid to American families and economic stimulus to significantly impacted industry sectors. The package also included extensive emergency funding for hospitals and medical providers. In addition to the general impact of COVID-19, certain provisions of the CARES Act as well as other recent legislative and regulatory relief efforts have had or are expected to have a material impact on the Company’s operations. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related adverse local and national economic consequences, the Company is subject to many risks, including but not limited to:

Financial Position and Results of Operations: COVID-19 has had a material impact on the Company’s allowance for loan losses. While to date there have been no significant charge-offs related to COVID-19, the allowance for loan losses calculation and resulting provision for loan losses have been significantly impacted by changes in economic conditions. Given that economic scenarios ~~have~~had become less certain since the pandemic was declared in early March 2020, management ~~believes the need for~~added additional allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses ~~has~~during the year ended December 31, 2020. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the allowance for credit losses was increased ~~significantly. For additional information see “NOTE 4 – LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES”~~further, largely due to the adoption of ASU 2016-13 (CECL) and partially offset by a release of allowance due to decrease in reserves on specifically assessed assets and improving trends in the ~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.~~Company’s loss experience and economic conditions in the markets in which we operate. Should economic conditions worsen, the Company could experience further increases in the required allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses and record additional provision for ~~loan~~credit losses expense. The execution of the payment deferral program discussed in the following commentary improved the ratio of past due loans to total loans. It is possible that asset quality measures could worsen at future measurement periods if the effects of COVID-19 are prolonged. For additional information see “NOTE 4 – LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Net interest income increased $9.9 million in 2021 as compared to 2020, largely due to increased volume in interest-earning assets, fees earned on the facilitation of government assistance programs and decreasing yields on interest-bearing liabilities. The Company’s interest and fee income could be reduced due to COVID-19. In keeping with guidance from regulators, the Company is actively working with COVID-19 affected borrowers to defer their payments, interest and ~~fees.~~fees throughout 2020 and 2021. While interest and fees will still accrue to income, through normal GAAP accounting, should eventual credit losses on these deferred payments emerge, interest income and fees accrued would need to be reversed. In such a scenario, interest income in future periods could be negatively impacted. At this time, the Company is unable to project the materiality of such an impact but recognizes the breadth of the economic impact may affect borrowers’ ability to repay in future periods.

Capital and Liquidity: As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, all the Company’s capital ratios and Equity Bank’s capital ratios were in excess of all regulatory requirements. While currently classified as well capitalized, an extended economic recession brought about by COVID-19 could adversely impact reported and regulatory capital ~~ratios by further credit losses.~~ratios. The Company relies on cash on hand as well as dividends from Equity Bank to service our debt. If Equity Bank’s capital deteriorates such that it is unable to pay dividends to the Company for an extended period, the Company may not be able service its debt.

The Company maintains access to multiple sources of liquidity. Wholesale funding markets have remained open to the Company, but rates for short term funding may be volatile. If funding costs are elevated for an extended period, it could have an adverse effect on net interest margin. If an extended recession caused large numbers of deposit customers to withdraw their funds, the Company might become more reliant on volatile or more expensive sources of funding.

Our Processes, Controls and Business Continuity Plan: In early March 2020, management successfully deployed a modified working strategy, including emphasis on social distancing and remote work as necessary to emphasize the safety of the Company’s teams and continuity of business processes. The Company and its leaders provided timely communications to team members and customers, implemented protocols for team member safety and initiated strategies for monitoring and responding to local COVID-19 impacts – including customer relief efforts. The Company’s preparedness efforts, coupled with quick and decisive plan implementation, resulted in minimal impacts to operations as a result of COVID-19. Prior technology planning resulted in the successful deployment of a portion of the operational team to a remote environment, while the remainder of the team continued to work on location in a workspace emphasizing social distancing. ~~To achieve implementation of the working strategy, during the first quarter of 2020,~~In 2021, the Company ~~incurred~~has returned to a ~~minimal amount~~predominantly in-person operating environment for our team. In keeping

with our efforts to protect the health our employees, the Company administered a vaccination clinic in each of ~~technology spending~~our markets to provide ~~additional laptops to~~ team members ~~who required them~~an opportunity to ~~work remotely.~~ be inoculated in line with CDC recommendations.

Since early May 2020, all the Company’s bank locations have been open to customers with ~~social distancing~~appropriate safety measures in place. The Company continues to serve customers curbside and drive-through ~~but offers~~while offering full lobby access during normal hours. No material operational or internal control challenges or risks have been identified to date. ~~The Company continues to anticipate and respond to any future COVID-19 interruptions or developments.~~ As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the Company does not anticipate significant challenges to our ability to maintain systems and controls considering the measures we have taken to prevent the spread of COVID-19. ~~The Company does not currently face any material resource constraint through the implementation of the business continuity plans.~~

Lending Operations and Accommodations to Borrowers: ~~In keeping with regulatory guidance to work with borrowers during this unprecedented situation,~~During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company executed a payment deferral program for our commercial lending clients that were adversely affected by the ~~pandemic. Depending on~~pandemic and keeping with the ~~demonstrated need~~extension of the client, the Company originally deferred either the full loan payment or the principal component of the loan payment for 90 or 180 days. Loans originally deferred for 90 days may, dependent on specific qualifications, be approved for an additional 90-day deferral. In accordance with interagency guidance issued in March 2020, these short-term deferrals are not automatically considered troubled debt restructurings, are not reflected in past due loan balances and have not been reported as a classified loan solely due to a deferral. Subsequent loan deferrals were assessed for troubled debt restructuring classification in accordance with section 4013 ofassociated provisions under the CARES Act, orcontinued the program in ~~accordance with interagency guidance, and if certain criteria were met the deferred loan was not classified as a troubled debt restructuring.~~2021. The ~~Company has made subsequent loan~~majority of these deferrals ~~that~~ have qualified under section 4013 of the CARES Act and ~~these deferred loans~~the CAA Act and, as such, were not classified as troubled debt restructurings. Deferred loans are subject to ongoing monitoring and will be downgraded or placed on nonaccrual if noted repayment weaknesses exist. ~~As of~~At December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the Company ~~had 28~~has 20 loans, totaling ~~$60.9~~$36.3 million, that have been granted a payment deferral, and remain on deferral, as part of our COVID-19 response.

We ~~have been~~were an active participant in all phases of the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), administered by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”), and we helped many of our customers obtain loans through the program. PPP loans generally have a ~~two-year~~two-or five year term and earn interest at 1.0%. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company ~~has~~had 144 and 1,612 loans, with an outstanding ~~balance~~balances of $44.8 million and $253.7 million that were originated under this program. ~~It is~~To date, the Company has been successful in obtaining forgiveness for these credits and it remains the Company’s understanding that the remaining loans funded through the ~~PPP~~ program are fully guaranteed by the U.S. ~~government.~~Government. Should those circumstances change, the Company could be required to establish additional allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses through additional provision for ~~loan~~credit losses expense charged to earnings.

The Company also ~~participates~~participated in the Main Street Lending Program (“MSL Program”), created by the Federal Reserve to support lending to small and medium-sized businesses and nonprofit organizations that were in sound financial condition before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. There was a total of $14.3 million and $14.1 million outstanding under the MSL Program for the ~~period~~periods ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.

~~Credit:~~ While all industries have and will continue to experience adverse impacts as a result of COVID-19, the Company had exposures (on balance sheet loans and commitments to lend) in the following loan categories that are considered to be most at-risk of a significant impact as of December 31, 2020.

Hospitality Lending – The Company’s exposure to the hospitality sector at December 31, 2020, approximated $264.9 million, or 11.3%, of total loans excluding PPP loans. As of December 31, 2020, $14.1 million of these loans were actively participating in a deferral program.

The top 20 loans within our hospitality portfolio comprise $216.6 million, or 81.8%, of the total exposure. These loans are geographically diversified and well secured. The borrowers are well known to the Company and experienced hoteliers who have evidenced efforts to enhance profitability in the current economic environment by driving down costs and creatively occupying their properties, including arrangements with medical professionals and others on the front line of this pandemic. Historically, the portfolio has exhibited strong operational cash flows. The remainder of the portfolio is comprised of many smaller balance loans.

Aircraft Manufacturing – The Company’s exposure to the aircraft manufacturing category at December 31, 2020, approximated $41.7 million, or 1.8%, of total loans excluding PPP loans. As of December 31, 2020, none of these loans were actively participating in a deferral program. The portfolio is comprised of experienced industry operators who have historically performed without exception.

The Company has worked with customers directly affected by COVID-19 and is prepared to offer short-term assistance in accordance with regulatory guidelines. As a result of the current economic environment caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company is engaging in frequent communication with borrowers to better understand their situation and the challenges faced, allowing us to respond proactively as needs and issues arise.

While management is optimistic about the performance of the above addressed portions of the portfolio as a whole, the Company acknowledges the risks associated with the current economic conditions and related unknowns. These risks are believed to have been addressed and reserved for through our allowance for loan losses and associated provision for loan losses as of and for the period ended December 31, 2020.

~~Retail Operations:~~ The Company is committed to assisting our customers and communities in this time of need. The Company is serving customers curbside and drive-through but offers full lobby access during normal hours. Temporary changes have been introduced to help with the financial hardship caused by COVID-19 for both our customers and non-customers.

The Company continues to monitor the safety of our staff through health stations at each work location. Staffing is adequate to address the requests for time off by any of our employees who are impacted by health or childcare issues.

~~Our significant~~The preparation of our financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make a number of judgements and assumptions that affect our reported results and disclosures. Several of our accounting policies are ~~integral~~inherently subject to ~~understanding~~valuation assumptions and other subjective assessments and are more critical than others in terms of their importance to results. Changes in any of the ~~results reported.~~estimates and assumptions underlying critical accounting policies could have a material effect on our financial statements. Our accounting policies are described in “NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. ~~We believe~~

The accounting policies that management believes are the most critical to an understanding of our ~~significant accounting policies,~~financial condition and results of operations and require complex management judgement are described below.

Allowance for Credit Losses: We adopted FASB ASU 2016-13 effective January 1, 2021, which requires the ~~following~~estimation of an allowance for credit losses in accordance with the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) methodology. The allowance for credit losses for loans represents management’s estimate of all expected credit losses over the expected contractual life of our loan portfolio. This assessment includes procedures to estimate the allowance and test the adequacy and appropriateness of the resulting balance. The level of the allowance is based upon management’s evaluation of historical default and loss experience, current and projected economic conditions, asset quality trends, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may ~~involve~~affect the borrower’s ability to repay a ~~higher degree~~loan (including the timing of ~~judgment~~future payments), the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, industry and ~~complexity.~~

~~Purchased Credit Impaired Loans:~~ ~~As a part~~peer bank loan quality indications and other pertinent factors, including regulatory recommendations. The level of ~~previous acquisitions, we acquired certain loans~~the allowance for ~~which there was, at acquisition, evidence of deterioration of~~ credit ~~quality since origination. These purchased credit impaired loans were recorded~~losses maintained by management is believed adequate to absorb all expected future losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the ~~acquisition date fair value, such that there is no carryover~~balance sheet date; however, determining the appropriateness of the ~~seller’s~~ allowance ~~for loan losses. After acquisition, losses~~is complex and requires judgment by management about the effect of matters that are ~~recognized~~inherently uncertain. The actual realized facts and circumstances may be different than those currently estimated by ~~an increase~~management and may result in significant changes in the allowance for credit losses in future periods. The allowance for credit losses for loans, as reported in our consolidated balance sheets, is adjusted by provision for credit losses, which is recognized in earnings and is reduced by the charge-off of loan ~~losses. Such purchased~~amounts, net of recoveries.

The Company utilizes primarily two methods for estimating the allowance for credit ~~impaired~~losses and the method used depends on the status of the underlying loans. Non-performing loans primarily utilize a collateral specific fair value impairment method and performing loans primarily utilize a historical loss method. The performing loan method utilizes a probability of default (PD) and loss given default (LGD) modeling approach for historical loss coupled with a macroeconomic factor analysis derived from a statistical

regression of loss experience correlated to changes in economic factors for all commercial banks operating within our geographical footprint. The macroeconomic regression is based on a multivariate approach and includes key indicators that provide the highest cumulative adjusted R-square figure. Economic factors include, but are ~~accounted~~not limited to, national unemployment, gross domestic product, market interest rates and property pricing indices. To arrive at the most predictive calculation, a lag factor was applied to these inputs, resulting in current and historic economic inputs driving the projection of loss over our reasonable and supportable forecast period, which managements has defined as 12 months for ~~individually. We estimate~~all portfolio segments. Following the ~~amount~~reasonable and ~~timing~~supportable forecast period, loss experience immediately reverts to the current historical loss experience of ~~expected cash flows~~the Company. The estimated loan losses for all loan segments are adjusted for changes in qualitative factors not inherently considered in the quantitative analyses. The qualitative categories and the measurements used to quantify the risks within each of these categories are subjectively selected by management but measured by objective measurements period over period. The current period measurements are evaluated and assigned a factor commensurate with the current level of risk relative to past measurements over time. The resulting qualitative adjustments are applied to the relevant collectively evaluated loan portfolios. These adjustments are based upon quarterly trend assessments in projective economic sentiment, portfolio concentrations, policy exceptions, personnel retention, independent loan review results, collateral considerations, risk ratings and competition. The qualitative allowance allocation, as determined by the processes noted above, is increased or decreased for each loan and the expected cash flows in excess of the amount paid are recorded as interest income over the remaining life of the loan (accretable yield). The excess of the loan’s contractual principal and interest over expected cash flows is not recorded (non-accretable difference). Over the life of the loan, expected cash flows continue to be estimated. If the present value of the expected cash flows is less than the carrying amount, a loss is recorded. If the present value of the expected cash flows is greater than the carrying amount, it is recognized as part of future interest income.

~~Impaired Loans:~~ A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all contractual principal and interest due according to the terms of the loan agreement. All loans are individually evaluated for impairment. Impaired loans are measuredsegment based on the ~~present value~~assessment of ~~expected~~these various qualitative factors. The resultant loss rates are applied to the estimated future ~~cash flows discounted~~exposure at default (EAD), as determined based on contractual amortization terms through an average default month and estimated prepayment experience in arriving at the loan’s effective interest rate or on the value of the underlying collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. We evaluate the collectability of both principal and interest when assessing the need for a loss accrual.

Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.

~~Troubled Debt Restructurings:~~ In cases where a borrower experiences financial difficulty and we make certain concessionary modifications to contractual terms, the loan is classified as a troubled debt restructured loan and classified as impaired. Generally, a nonaccrual loan that is a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) remains on nonaccrual until such time that repayment of the remaining principal and interest is not in doubt, and the borrower has a period of satisfactory repayment performance.

~~Allowance for Loan Losses:~~ ~~The~~quantitative reserve within our allowance for ~~loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred~~ credit losses. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the collectability of a loan balance is unlikely. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. Management estimates the allowance balance required using past loan loss experience, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values, economic conditions, and other factors. A loan review process, independent of the loan approval process, is utilized by management to verify loans are being made and administered in accordance with Company policy, to review loan risk grades and potential losses, to verify that potential problem loans are receiving adequate and timely corrective measures to avoid or reduce losses, and to assist in the verification of the adequacy of the loan loss reserve. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged-off.

The allowance ~~consists~~represents management’s best estimate, but significant changes in circumstances relating to loan quality and economic conditions could result in significantly different results than what is reflected in the consolidated balance sheet as of ~~specific~~December 31, 2021. Likewise, an improvement in loan quality or economic conditions may allow for a further reduction in the required allowance. Changing credit conditions would be expected to impact realized losses driving variability in specifically assessed allowances, as well as calculated quantitative and ~~general components.~~more subjectively analyzed qualitative factors. Depending on the volatility in these conditions, material impacts could be realized within the Company’s operations. Likewise, changing economic conditions, both positive and negative, to the extent significant could result in unexpected realization of provision or reversal of allowance for credit losses due to its impact on the quantitative and qualitative inputs to the Company’s calculation. Under the CECL methodology, the impact of these conditions has the potential to further exacerbate periodic differences due to its life of loan perspective. The ~~specific component relates~~life of loans calculated under the methodology is based in contractual duration and modified for prepayment expectations, making significant variation in periodic results possible due to ~~loans that are individually classified as impaired. If a loan is impaired, a portion~~changing contractual or adjusted duration of the ~~allowance is allocated so that~~assets within the loan is reported net at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the sale of the collateral. TDR’s are separately identified for impairment disclosures and are measured at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s effective rate at inception. If a TDR is considered to be a collateral dependent loan, the loan is reported, net, at the fair value of the collateral. For TDR’s that subsequently default, we determine the amount of reserve in accordance with the accounting policy for the allowance for loan losses.

The general component of the allowance for loan losses covers non-impaired loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current factors. The historical loss experience is determined by portfolio and class and is based on the actual loss history experienced by us. This actual loss experience is then adjusted by comparing current conditions to the conditions that existed during the loss history. We consider the changes related to (i) lending policies, (ii) economic conditions, (iii) nature and volume of the loan portfolio and class, (iv) lending staff, (v) volume and severity of past due, non-accrual, and risk graded loans, (vi) loan review system, (vii) value of underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans, (viii) concentration levels and (ix) effects of other external factors.calculation

Goodwill: Goodwill results from business acquisitions and represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of acquired tangible assets and liabilities and identifiable intangible assets.

Goodwill is assessed at least annually for impairment and any such impairment is recognized and expensed in the period identified. Goodwill will be assessed more frequently if a triggering event occurs which indicates that the carrying value of the asset might be impaired. We have selected December 31 as the date to perform our annual goodwill impairment test. Goodwill is the only intangible asset with an indefinite useful life. ~~At September 30,~~For the year ended December 31, 2021, following recognition of a material impairment in goodwill balances during 2020, based on the improving market conditions, strong earnings performance by the Company, and improvements in market value of our stock as well the broader industry, management has determined there was not evidence of a triggering event as of or during the period then ended. Based on this qualitative analysis and conclusion, it was determined that a more robust quantitative assessment was not necessary at our measurement date.

When performing quantitative goodwill ~~was impaired~~impairment assessments, management is required to estimate the fair value of the Company’s equity in a change in control transaction. To complete this valuation, management is required to derive assumptions related to industry performance, reporting unit business performance, economic and ~~subsequently booked a $104.8 million non-cash impairment charge.~~ market conditions and various other assumptions, many of which require significant management judgement.

For additional information see “NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES” and “NOTE 7 – GOODWILL AND CORE DEPOSIT INTANGIBLES” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~Fair Value:~~ Fair values of assets and liabilities are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments, collateral values and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular assets and liabilities. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could materially affect the estimates.

We generate most of our revenue from interest income and fees on loans, interest and dividends on investment securities and non-interest income, such as service charges and fees, debit card income and mortgage banking income. We incur interest expense on deposits and other borrowed funds and non-interest expense, such as salaries and employee benefits and occupancy expenses.

Changes in interest rates earned on interest-earning assets or incurred on interest-bearing liabilities, as well as the volume and types of interest-earning assets, interest-bearing and non-interest-bearing liabilities and stockholders’ equity, are usually the largest drivers of periodic change in net interest income. Fluctuations in interest rates are driven by many factors, including governmental

monetary policies, inflation, deflation, macroeconomic developments, changes in unemployment, the money supply, political and international circumstances and domestic and foreign financial markets. Periodic changes in the volume and types of loans in our loan portfolio are affected by, among other factors, economic and competitive conditions in Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma, as well as developments affecting the consumer, commercial and real estate sectors within these markets.

For information comparing our results of operations for the year ended December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, to year ended December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, see “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March ~~10, 2020.~~9, 2021.

Year ended December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, compared with year ended December 31, ~~2019~~2020

For the year ended December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, there was a net ~~loss and~~income allocable to common stockholders of $52.5 million, compared to a net loss allocable to common stockholders of $75.0 million ~~compared to net income and net income allocable to common stockholders of $25.6 million~~ for ~~the year ended December 31, 2019, a decrease of $100.5 million. During~~ the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase ~~in non-interest expense~~ of ~~$109.4 million,~~$127.5 million. This change was primarily ~~due to~~driven by a goodwill impairment of $104.8 million ~~charge to goodwill impairment, and an increase~~during 2020, a decrease in provision for loan losses of ~~$5.9~~$32.7 million, ~~were~~an increase in non-interest income of $6.8 million, and a decrease in interest expense on deposits of $8.3 million, partially offset by ~~a decrease~~an increase in provision for income taxes of ~~$6.9 million and increases in net interest income of $6.8 million and non-interest income of $1.0 million when compared to the year ended December 31, 2019.~~$11.6 million. The changes in the components of net income are discussed in more detail below in the following sections of “Results of Operations.”

Net interest income is the difference between interest income on interest-earning assets, including loans and securities, and interest expense incurred on interest-bearing liabilities, including deposits and other borrowed funds. To evaluate net interest income, management measures and monitors (1) yields on loans and other interest-earning assets, (2) the costs of deposits and other funding sources, (3) the net interest spread and (4) net interest margin. Net interest spread is the difference between rates earned on interest-earning assets and rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest margin is calculated as net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets. Because non-interest-bearing sources of funds, such as non-interest-bearing deposits and stockholders’ equity also fund interest-earning assets, net interest margin includes the benefit of these non-interest-bearing sources of funds. Net interest income is affected by changes in the amount and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, referred to as a “volume change,” and it is also affected by changes in yields earned on interest-earning assets and rates paid on interest-bearing deposits and other borrowed funds, referred to as a “yield/rate change.”

The following table shows the average balance of each principal category of assets, liabilities, and stockholders’ equity and the average yields on interest-earning assets and average rates on interest-bearing liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018.~~2019. The yields and rates are calculated by dividing income or expense by the average daily balances of the associated assets or liabilities.

	December 31, 2020							December 31, 2019							December 31, 2018							December 31, 2021							December 31, 2020							December 31, 2019
(Dollars in thousands)	Average Outstanding Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Average Yield/ Rate⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾			Average Outstanding Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Average Yield/ Rate⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾			Average Outstanding Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Average Yield/ Rate⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾			Average Outstanding Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Average Yield/ Rate⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾			Average Outstanding Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Average Yield/ Rate⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾			Average Outstanding Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Average Yield/ Rate⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾
Interest-earning assets
Loans⁽¹⁾
Loans⁽¹⁾
Commercial and industrial	$	763,971	$	35,601		4.66	%	$	567,215	$	34,225		6.03	%	$	537,772	$	31,397		5.84	%	$	714,561	$	41,580		5.82	%	$	763,971	$	35,601		4.66	%	$	567,215	$	34,225		6.03	%
Commercial real estate		952,082		50,667		5.32	%		1,012,146		57,316		5.66	%		921,684		50,957		5.53	%		1,040,443		48,676		4.68	%		952,082		50,667		5.32	%		1,012,146		57,316		5.66	%
Real estate construction		238,015		10,947		4.60	%		212,658		13,776		6.48	%		238,271		14,752		6.19	%		277,307		10,256		3.70	%		238,015		10,947		4.60	%		212,658		13,776		6.48	%
Residential real estate		449,789		19,894		4.42	%		519,119		24,338		4.69	%		419,698		21,442		5.11	%		498,164		19,341		3.88	%		449,789		19,894		4.42	%		519,119		24,338		4.69	%
Agricultural real estate		133,813		8,008		5.98	%		140,365		8,496		6.05	%		117,872		7,420		6.29	%		153,607		8,122		5.29	%		133,813		8,008		5.98	%		140,365		8,496		6.05	%
Agricultural																							108,276		5,361		4.95	%		88,206		4,944		5.61	%		85,747		5,584		6.51	%
Consumer		70,064		4,603		6.57	%		70,390		5,563		7.90	%		56,733		4,754		8.38	%		88,383		3,998		4.52	%		70,064		4,603		6.57	%		70,390		5,563		7.90	%
Agricultural		88,206		4,944		5.61	%		85,747		5,584		6.51	%		96,479		6,326		6.56	%
Total loans		2,695,940		134,664		5.00	%		2,607,640		149,298		5.73	%		2,388,509		137,048		5.74	%		2,880,741		137,334		4.77	%		2,695,940		134,664		5.00	%		2,607,640		149,298		5.73	%
Taxable securities		727,451		15,521		2.13	%		777,802		19,339		2.49	%		671,817		17,943		2.67	%		976,942		15,996		1.64	%		727,451		15,521		2.13	%		777,802		19,339		2.49	%
Nontaxable securities		122,783		3,682		3.00	%		142,816		4,180		2.93	%		134,038		4,089		3.05	%		105,522		2,843		2.69	%		122,783		3,682		3.00	%		142,816		4,180		2.93	%
Federal funds sold and other		112,053		1,694		1.51	%		83,887		2,682		3.20	%		77,681		2,476		3.19	%		182,443		1,195		0.65	%		112,053		1,694		1.51	%		83,887		2,682		3.20	%
Total interest-earning assets		3,658,227		155,561		4.25	%		3,612,145		175,499		4.86	%		3,272,045		161,556		4.94	%		4,145,648		157,368		3.80	%		3,658,227		155,561		4.25	%		3,612,145		175,499		4.86	%
Non-interest-earning assets
Other real estate owned, net		7,578							6,291							7,071							10,510							7,578							6,291
Premises and equipment, net		86,487							83,495							72,390							93,539							86,487							83,495
Bank-owned life insurance		75,998							74,025							71,041							103,255							75,998							74,025
Goodwill and other intangibles, net		130,329							158,410							139,131							50,831							130,329							158,410
Other non-interest-earning assets		41,089							44,704							37,235							28,017							41,089							44,704
Total assets	$	3,999,708						$	3,979,070						$	3,598,913						$	4,431,800						$	3,999,708						$	3,979,070
Interest-bearing liabilities
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	805,651		3,157		0.39	%	$	683,180		8,101		1.19	%	$	602,506		5,176		0.86	%	$	1,032,938		2,165		0.21	%	$	805,651		3,157		0.39	%	$	683,180		8,101		1.19	%
Savings and money market		989,457		2,736		0.28	%		1,016,772		12,907		1.27	%		798,820		7,507		0.94	%		1,129,869		1,540		0.14	%		989,457		2,736		0.28	%		1,016,772		12,907		1.27	%
Savings, NOW and money market		1,795,108		5,893		0.33	%		1,699,952		21,008		1.24	%		1,401,326		12,683		0.91	%		2,162,807		3,705		0.17	%		1,795,108		5,893		0.33	%		1,699,952		21,008		1.24	%
Certificates of deposit		704,921		10,689		1.52	%		967,803		19,906		2.06	%		836,298		13,004		1.55	%		625,562		4,550		0.73	%		704,921		10,689		1.52	%		967,803		19,906		2.06	%
Total interest-bearing deposits		2,500,029		16,582		0.66	%		2,667,755		40,914		1.53	%		2,237,624		25,687		1.15	%		2,788,369		8,255		0.30	%		2,500,029		16,582		0.66	%		2,667,755		40,914		1.53	%
FHLB term and line of credit advances		213,155		2,292		1.08	%		277,327		6,667		2.40	%		430,490		9,039		2.10	%		16,797		169		1.01	%		213,155		2,292		1.08	%		277,327		6,667		2.40	%
Federal Reserve Bank discount window		2,462		6		0.24	%	—		—			—	%	—		—			—	%		3		—		0.25	%		2,462		6		0.24	%	—		—			—	%
Bank stock loan		12,061		415		3.44	%		12,327		654		5.31	%		14,241		731		5.13	%		—		—		—	%		12,061		415		3.44	%		12,327		654		5.31	%
Subordinated borrowings		49,500		3,509		7.09	%		14,403		1,251		8.69	%		14,107		1,187		8.41	%		89,785		6,261		6.97	%		49,500		3,509		7.09	%		14,403		1,251		8.69	%
Other borrowings		45,041		105		0.23	%		42,540		155		0.36	%		43,714		114		0.26	%		45,819		104		0.23	%		45,041		105		0.23	%		42,540		155		0.36	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		2,822,248		22,909		0.81	%		3,014,352		49,641		1.65	%		2,740,176		36,758		1.34	%		2,940,773		14,789		0.50	%		2,822,248		22,909		0.81	%		3,014,352		49,641		1.65	%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Non-interest-bearing checking accounts		678,713							478,638							426,410							1,021,261							678,713							478,638
Non-interest-bearing liabilities		34,139							22,635							11,874							22,971							34,139							22,635
Stockholders’ equity		464,608							463,445							420,453							446,795							464,608							463,445
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	3,999,708						$	3,979,070						$	3,598,913						$	4,431,800						$	3,999,708						$	3,979,070
Net interest income			$	132,652						$	125,858						$	124,798						$	142,579						$	132,652						$	125,858
Interest rate spread						3.44	%						3.21	%						3.60	%						3.30	%						3.44	%						3.21	%
Net interest margin⁽²⁾						3.63	%						3.48	%						3.81	%
Net interest margin⁽²⁾																											3.44	%						3.63	%						3.48	%
Total cost of deposits, including non-interest bearing deposits	$	3,178,742	$	16,582		0.52	%	$	3,146,393	$	40,914		1.30	%	$	2,664,034	$	25,687		0.96	%	$	3,809,630	$	8,255		0.22	%	$	3,178,742	$	16,582		0.52	%	$	3,146,393	$	40,914		1.30	%
Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities						129.62	%						119.83	%						119.41	%						140.97	%						129.62	%						119.83	%

⁽¹⁾⁽¹⁾Average loan balances include nonaccrual loans, hedge fair value adjustments and merger fair value adjustments.

⁽²⁾⁽²⁾Net interest margin is calculated by dividing net interest income by average interest-earning assets for the period.

⁽³⁾⁽³⁾Tax exempt income is not included in the above table on a tax equivalent basis.

⁽⁴⁾⁽⁴⁾Actual unrounded values are used to calculate the reported yield or rate disclosed. Accordingly, recalculations using the amounts in thousands as disclosed in this report may not produce the same amounts.

Increases and decreases in interest income and interest expense result from changes in average balances (volume) of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as changes in average interest yields/rates. The following table analyzes the change in volume variances and yield/rate variances for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2020, and the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the year ended December 31, ~~2019, and the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018.~~2019.

	2020 vs. 2019									2019 vs. 2018									2021 vs. 2020									2020 vs. 2019
	Increase (Decrease) Due to:									Increase (Decrease) Due to:									Increase (Decrease) Due to:									Increase (Decrease) Due to:
(Dollars in thousands)	Volume⁽¹⁾			Yield/Rate⁽¹⁾			Total			Volume⁽¹⁾			Yield/Rate⁽¹⁾			Total			Volume⁽¹⁾			Yield/Rate⁽¹⁾			Total			Volume⁽¹⁾			Yield/Rate⁽¹⁾			Total
Interest-earning assets
Loans
Commercial and industrial	$	10,240		$	(8,864	)	$	1,376		$	1,755		$	1,073		$	2,828		$	(2,421	)	$	8,400		$	5,979		$	10,240		$	(8,864	)	$	1,376
Commercial real estate		(3,300	)		(3,349	)		(6,649	)		5,099			1,260			6,359			4,455			(6,446	)		(1,991	)		(3,300	)		(3,349	)		(6,649	)
Real estate construction		1,504			(4,333	)		(2,829	)		(1,637	)		661			(976	)		1,645			(2,336	)		(691	)		1,504			(4,333	)		(2,829	)
Residential real estate		(3,121	)		(1,323	)		(4,444	)		4,769			(1,873	)		2,896			2,017			(2,570	)		(553	)		(3,121	)		(1,323	)		(4,444	)
Agricultural real estate		(393	)		(95	)		(488	)		1,371			(295	)		1,076			1,107			(993	)		114			(393	)		(95	)		(488	)
Agricultural																				1,038			(621	)		417			156			(796	)		(640	)
Consumer		(26	)		(934	)		(960	)		1,092			(283	)		809			1,032			(1,637	)		(605	)		(26	)		(934	)		(960	)
Agricultural		156			(796	)		(640	)		(699	)		(43	)		(742	)
Total loans		5,060			(19,694	)		(14,634	)		11,750			500			12,250			8,873			(6,203	)		2,670			5,060			(19,694	)		(14,634	)
Taxable securities		(1,196	)		(2,622	)		(3,818	)		2,694			(1,298	)		1,396			4,586			(4,111	)		475			(1,196	)		(2,622	)		(3,818	)
Nontaxable securities		(599	)		101			(498	)		261			(170	)		91			(487	)		(352	)		(839	)		(599	)		101			(498	)
Federal funds sold and other		716			(1,704	)		(988	)		198			8			206			748			(1,247	)		(499	)		716			(1,704	)		(988	)
Total interest-earning assets	$	3,981		$	(23,919	)	$	(19,938	)	$	14,903		$	(960	)		13,943		$	13,720		$	(11,913	)	$	1,807		$	3,981		$	(23,919	)		(19,938	)
Interest-bearing liabilities
Savings, NOW and money market	$	909		$	(16,024	)	$	(15,115	)	$	3,125		$	5,200		$	8,325		$	1,079		$	(3,267	)	$	(2,188	)	$	909		$	(16,024	)	$	(15,115	)
Certificates of deposit		(4,685	)		(4,532	)		(9,217	)		2,261			4,641			6,902			(1,092	)		(5,047	)		(6,139	)		(4,685	)		(4,532	)		(9,217	)
Total interest-bearing deposits		(3,776	)		(20,556	)		(24,332	)		5,386			9,841			15,227			(13	)		(8,314	)		(8,327	)		(3,776	)		(20,556	)		(24,332	)
FHLB term and line of credit advances		(1,291	)		(3,084	)		(4,375	)		(3,548	)		1,176			(2,372	)		(1,989	)		(134	)		(2,123	)		(1,291	)		(3,084	)		(4,375	)
Federal Reserve Bank discount window		6			—			6			—			—			—			(6	)		—			(6	)		6			—			6
Bank stock loan		(14	)		(225	)		(239	)		(101	)		24			(77	)		(415	)		—			(415	)		(14	)		(225	)		(239	)
Subordinated borrowings		2,527			(269	)		2,258			25			39			64			2,810			(58	)		2,752			2,527			(269	)		2,258
Other borrowings		9			(59	)		(50	)		(4	)		45			41			1			(2	)		(1	)		9			(59	)		(50	)
Total interest-bearing liabilities		(2,539	)		(24,193	)		(26,732	)		1,758			11,125			12,883			388			(8,508	)		(8,120	)		(2,539	)		(24,193	)		(26,732	)
Net Interest Income	$	6,520		$	274		$	6,794		$	13,145		$	(12,085	)	$	1,060		$	13,332		$	(3,405	)	$	9,927		$	6,520		$	274		$	6,794

⁽¹⁾⁽¹⁾The effect of changes in volume is determined by multiplying the change in volume by the previous year’s average rate. Similarly, the effect of rate changes is calculated by multiplying the change in average rate by the prior year’s volume. The changes attributable to both volume and rate, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated to the volume variance and the rate variance in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amount of the change in each.

Year ended December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, compared with year ended December 31, ~~2019~~2020

The increase in net interest income before the provision for ~~loan~~credit losses is primarily due to the increase in the volume of interest-earnings assets and a 31 basis point decrease in average rates of interest bearing liabilities, partially offset by a 6145 basis point decrease in yields on interest-earning assets. ~~This decrease in yield is largely due to the 1.00% PPP loans, administered by the SBA, in our portfolio during 2020.~~ The increase in average volume of interest-earning assets was primarily due to increases in loans. ~~The decrease in interest expense was due to an 84 basis point decrease in the average rates of interest-bearing liabilities and an overall decrease in volume of interest-bearing liabilities.~~

The increase in loan interest income was driven by the ~~$88.3~~$184.8 million increase in average loan volume. The impact to net interest income from loan fees for the year ended December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, was ~~$10.4~~$19.5 million compared to ~~$4.7~~$10.4 million for the year ended December 31, ~~2019.~~2020.

Average balances of borrowings from the FHLB decreased by ~~$64.2~~$196.4 million from ~~an average balance of $277.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, to~~ an average balance of $213.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, to an average balance of $16.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, coupled with a ~~132~~7 basis point decrease in average borrowing cost resulted in a decrease in interest expense of ~~$4.4~~$2.1 million. Interest expense on subordinated borrowings for the ~~bank stock loan~~year ended December 31, 2021, was $6.3 million compared to $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, ~~was $415 thousand compared~~an increase of $2.8 million. Total cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 31 basis points to ~~$654 thousand~~0.50% for the year ended December 31, ~~2019. Total cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 84 basis points to~~2021, from 0.81% for the year ended December 31, ~~2020, from 1.65% for the year ended December 31, 2019.~~2020.

The increase in net interest margin is largely due to the cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreasing at a faster rate than interest-earning assets. The decrease in cost of funds is primarily from the overall decrease in rates on interest-bearing liabilities, partially due to an increase in non-interest-bearing checking accounts and to a ~~lesser degree, the~~ decrease in the volume of borrowings.

We maintain an allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses for ~~probable incurred credit losses.~~estimated losses in our loan portfolio. The allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses is increased by a provision for loan losses, which is a charge to earnings, and subsequent recoveries of amounts previously charged-off, but is decreased by charge-offs when the collectability of a loan balance is unlikely. Management estimates the allowance balance required using past loan loss experience within the ~~nature and volume of the loan portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values, discounted cash flows,~~Company’s portfolio. This historical loss calculation is then modified to reflect quantitative economic circumstances based on evidenced economic conditions and ~~other~~regression formulas which incorporate of lag factors ~~including regulatory guidance.~~in identifying a sufficiently predictive adjusted-R square as well as qualitative factors not inherently reflected in our historical loss or quantitative economic inputs. Included in our qualitative assessment is the consideration of a prospective economic conditions over the preceding 12 months, considered the Company’s reasonable, supportable forecast period. As these factors change, the amount of the ~~loan~~credit loss provision changes.

Year ended December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, compared with year ended December 31, ~~2019~~2020

~~The~~There was an $8.5 million reversal of provision for ~~loan~~credit losses for the period ended December 31, ~~2020, was $24.3 million~~2021, compared to ~~$18.4~~a provision of $24.3 million for the period ended December 31, ~~2019.~~2020. The release of allowance was principally due to reductions in reserves on specifically assessed assets excluding PCD loans and decreases in the calculated allowance on collectively evaluated performing loans. The decrease in impairments on specifically evaluated loans was due to resolution of a few larger relationships discussed below and general improvement in asset quality. The change in the calculated allowance on collectively evaluated loans was primarily driven by the implementation of CECL effective January 1, 2021 resulting in the calculation of a life of loan estimate versus this historical single year approach as well as period over period growth in the portfolio partially offset by improving trends in historical loss experience and economic conditions in the markets in which the Company operates. The provision was increased significantly during the period ended December 31, 2020, largely as the result of increases in qualitative loss factors brought on by the projected economic impact of COVID-19. As part of the process to adjust qualitative factors in response to COVID-19, we considered the loss rates we experienced during the last economic downturn, the level of loan deferrals in the loan portfolio and industries we considered at risk to determine the necessary level of probable incurred loss. The loss rate adjustments from the last economic downturn were allocated across all loan segments as projecting losses to any one loan segment would be difficult given the unique nature of the pandemic and the pandemic was expected to impact all loan segments.

~~Included in~~During the period ended December 31, ~~2019,~~2021, there was a ~~first quarter $14.5~~recovery of $1.9 million from a relationship previously disclosed in 2019 that also had a specific reserve of $1.9 million that was released, which resulted in a net provision reversal of $3.8 million. Another large relationship that incurred a $5.5 million provision ~~against one credit relationship believed~~in 2021 was moved to ~~be an isolated incident unique within our portfolio. We charged-off~~repossessed assets and was partially sold in January 2022. Two other separate credits resulted in a net provision increase of ~~$15.2~~$1.2 million ~~on this credit relationship during~~for the year ended December 31, ~~2019.~~2021. For additional detail see “Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Allowance for ~~Loan~~Credit Losses.” Net charge-offs for the year ended December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, were ~~$2.8~~$8.7 million as compared to net charge-offs of ~~$17.6~~$2.8 million for the year ended December 31, ~~2019.~~2020. For the year ended December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, gross charge-offs were ~~$3.3~~$11.4 million offset by gross recoveries of ~~$544 thousand.~~$2.7 million. In comparison, gross charge-offs were ~~$18.7~~$3.3 million for the year ended December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, offset by gross recoveries of ~~$1.1 million.~~$544 thousand.

The primary sources of non-interest income are service charges and fees, debit card income, mortgage banking income, increases in the value of ~~bank owned~~bank-owned life insurance, investment referral income, the recovery of zero-basis purchased loans, net gains on the sale of available-for-sale securities and other securities transactions. Non-interest income does not include loan origination or other loan fees which are recognized as an adjustment to yield using the interest method.

The following table provides a comparison of the major components of non-interest income for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018.~~2019.

									2020 vs. 2019						2019 vs. 2018														2021 vs. 2020						2020 vs. 2019
(Dollars in thousands)	2020			2019		2018			Change			%			Change			%			2021			2020			2019		Change			%			Change			%
Service charges and fees	$	6,856		$	8,672	$	7,250		$	(1,816	)		(20.9	)%	$	1,422			19.6	%	$	8,596		$	6,856		$	8,672	$	1,740			25.4	%	$	(1,816	)		(20.9	)%
Debit card income		9,136			8,230		6,178			906			11.0	%		2,052			33.2	%		10,236			9,136			8,230		1,100			12.0	%		906			11.0	%
Mortgage banking		3,153			2,468		1,298			685			27.8	%		1,170			90.1	%		3,306			3,153			2,468		153			4.9	%		685			27.8	%
Increase in value of bank-owned life insurance		1,941			1,998		2,199			(57	)		(2.9	)%		(201	)		(9.1	)%		3,506			1,941			1,998		1,565			80.6	%		(57	)		(2.9	)%
Other
Investment referral income		567			590		395			(23	)		(3.9	)%		195			49.4	%		678			567			590		111			19.6	%		(23	)		(3.9	)%
Trust income		433			243		81			190			78.2	%		162			200.0	%		1,140			433			243		707			163.3	%		190			78.2	%
Insurance sales commissions		275			177		245			98			55.4	%		(68	)		(27.8	)%		545			275			177		270			98.2	%		98			55.4	%
Recovery on zero-basis purchased loans		134			143		420			(9	)		(6.3	)%		(277	)		(66.0	)%		85			134			143		(49	)		(36.6	)%		(9	)		(6.3	)%
Income from equity method investments		(210	)		26		7			(236	)		(907.7	)%		19			271.4	%		(222	)		(210	)		26		(12	)		5.7	%		(236	)		(907.7	)%
Other non-interest income		1,582			2,427		1,661			(845	)		(34.8	)%		766			46.1	%		3,981			1,582			2,427		2,399			151.6	%		(845	)		(34.8	)%
Total other		2,781			3,606		2,809			(825	)		(22.9	)%		797			28.4	%		6,207			2,781			3,606		3,426			123.2	%		(825	)		(22.9	)%
Sub-Total		23,867			24,974		19,734			(1,107	)		(4.4	)%		5,240			26.6	%
Subtotal																						31,851			23,867			24,974		7,984			33.5	%		(1,107	)		(4.4	)%
Gain on acquisition		2,145			—		—			2,145			100.0	%		—			—	%		585			2,145			—		(1,560	)		(72.7	)%		2,145			(100.0	)%
Net gain (loss) from securities transactions		11			14		(9	)		(3	)		(21.4	)%		23			(255.6	)%		406			11			14		395			3590.9	%		(3	)		(21.4	)%
Total non-interest income	$	26,023		$	24,988	$	19,725		$	1,035			4.1	%	$	5,263			26.7	%	$	32,842		$	26,023		$	24,988	$	6,819			26.2	%	$	1,035			4.1	%

Year ended December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, compared with year ended December 31, ~~2019~~2020

~~The increase~~Non-interest income improved in 2021 by 26% driven by continued expansion of customer service charges led by deposit service fees, debit card and trust and wealth management income, as well as insurance commissions and fees, credit card fees, and loan servicing fees which are included in ‘Other non-interest ~~income was primarily~~income’ and collectively improved by $1.6 million reflecting the Company’s continued emphasis on offering innovative products to our customer base. Income further improved due to ~~gain~~increased earnings on ~~acquisition~~bank owned life insurance due to an increasing asset base and ~~increases in debit card income, mortgage banking fees, trust income~~the realization of benefits from utilization of the policies and ~~insurance sales commissions, partially offset by decreases in service charges and fees, other non-interest income, income from equity method investments and increase~~improvement in the value of ~~bank-owned life insurance. During~~ the ~~year ended December 31, 2020, there was $2.1 million~~Company’s derivative positions. These improvement were partially offset by a decline in gain on acquisition ~~related to the~~which was driven by purchase of Almena acquisition. Debit card income was $9.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $906 thousand, or 11.0%, from $8.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. Mortgage banking increased $685 thousand, or 27.8%, from $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, to $3.2 million for the year ended December 31,in 2020. Service charges and fees decreased $1.8 million during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the same time period during 2019, primarily due to a decrease in non-sufficient fund charges. In connection with acquisitions, we received the rights to certain loans that were previously charged-off by the acquired bank. At acquisition, there was no expectation of future cash flows from these previously charged-off loans and thus they were assigned a zero basis. Subsequent to the acquisitions, we have received cash payments on several of these loans. No interest has been accrued as cash flow payments have not been expected prior to receipt. Cash receipts on these zero-basis loans totaled $134 thousand and $143 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

The following table provides a comparison of the major components of non-interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018.~~2019.

								2020 vs. 2019						2019 vs. 2018													2021 vs. 2020						2020 vs. 2019
(Dollars in thousands)	2020		2019		2018			Change			%			Change			%			2021			2020		2019		Change			%			Change			%
Salaries and employee benefits	$	54,129	$	52,122	$	48,018		$	2,007			3.9	%	$	4,104			8.5	%	$	54,198		$	54,129	$	52,122	$	69			0.1	%	$	2,007			3.9	%
Net occupancy and equipment		8,784		8,674		8,126			110			1.3	%		548			6.7	%		10,137			8,784		8,674		1,353			15.4	%		110			1.3	%
Data processing		10,991		10,124		8,094			867			8.6	%		2,030			25.1	%		13,261			10,991		10,124		2,270			20.7	%		867			8.6	%
Professional fees		4,282		4,734		3,402			(452	)		(9.5	)%		1,332			39.2	%		4,713			4,282		4,734		431			10.1	%		(452	)		(9.5	)%
Advertising and business development		2,498		3,075		3,002			(577	)		(18.8	)%		73			2.4	%		3,370			2,498		3,075		872			34.9	%		(577	)		(18.8	)%
Telecommunications		1,873		2,079		1,775			(206	)		(9.9	)%		304			17.1	%		1,966			1,873		2,079		93			5.0	%		(206	)		(9.9	)%
FDIC insurance		2,088		1,228		1,536			860			70.0	%		(308	)		(20.1	)%		1,665			2,088		1,228		(423	)		(20.3	)%		860			70.0	%
Courier and postage		1,441		1,348		1,183			93			6.9	%		165			13.9	%		1,429			1,441		1,348		(12	)		(0.8	)%		93			6.9	%
Free nationwide ATM expense		1,609		1,680		1,355			(71	)		(4.2	)%		325			24.0	%		2,019			1,609		1,680		410			25.5	%		(71	)		(4.2	)%
Amortization of core deposit intangibles		3,850		3,168		2,443			682			21.5	%		725			29.7	%		4,174			3,850		3,168		324			8.4	%		682			21.5	%
Loan expense		789		875		1,005			(86	)		(9.8	)%		(130	)		(12.9	)%		934			789		875		145			18.4	%		(86	)		(9.8	)%
Other real estate owned		2,310		707		(71	)		1,603			226.7	%		778			(1095.8	)%		(188	)		2,310		707		(2,498	)		(108.1	)%		1,603			226.7	%
Loss on debt extinguishment																					372			—		—		372			100.0	%		—			—	%
Other		9,216		8,906		7,057			310			3.5	%		1,849			26.2	%		12,226			9,216		8,906		3,010			32.7	%		310			3.5	%
Sub-Total		103,860		98,720		86,925			5,140			5.2	%		11,795			13.6	%
Subtotal																					110,276			103,860		98,720		6,416			6.2	%		5,140			5.2	%
Merger expenses		299		915		7,462			(616	)		(67.3	)%		(6,547	)		(87.7	)%		9,189			299		915		8,890			2973.2	%		(616	)		(67.3	)%
Goodwill impairment		104,831		—		—			104,831			100.0	%		—			—	%		—			104,831		—		(104,831	)		(100.0	)%		104,831			—	%
Total non-interest expense	$	208,990	$	99,635	$	94,387		$	109,355			109.8	%	$	5,248			5.6	%	$	119,465		$	208,990	$	99,635	$	(89,525	)		(42.8	)%	$	109,355			109.8	%

Year ended December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, compared with year ended December 31, ~~2019~~2020

~~This increase~~The decrease in non-interest expense was primarily due to a $104.8 million ~~charge to~~ goodwill impairment charge in 2020 and ~~increases in salaries and employee benefits of $2.0 million,~~gains on other real estate owned properties of ~~$1.6~~$2.5 million, offset by increases in occupancy of $1.4 million, data processing of ~~$867 thousand, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance of $860 thousand, amortization of core deposit intangibles of $682 thousand,~~$2.3 million, and other other non-interest expense of $310 thousand and net occupancy and equipment of $110 thousand, partially offset by decreases in merger expense of $616 thousand, advertising and business development of $577 thousand, professional fees of $452 thousand and telecommunications of $206 thousand.$3.4. These items and other changes in the various components of non-interest expense are discussed in more detail below.

Salaries and employee benefits: There was a ~~$2.0~~$2.5 million increase in salaries for the year ended December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, as compared to the year ended December 31, ~~2019.~~2020. This increase reflects the addition of staff related to the October ~~2020 Almena~~2021 ASBI acquisition, the December 2021 Security acquisition, and the full year effect of the addition of staff related to the ~~February 2019 MidFirst~~October 2020 Almena acquisition. ~~In addition, during~~The total increase in salary expense was offset by an increase in deferred fees of $4.4 million for the ~~same time~~ period ended December 31, 2021, compared to the period ended December 31, 2020. Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2021, there was an increase in incentives and bonuses of ~~$2.0~~$1.8 million and retirement plan expense of $127 thousand, offset by decreases in restricted stock unit expense of ~~$659 thousand and retirement plan expense of $213 thousand, partially offset by the deferral of $1.2 million of loan origination costs associated with originating SBA PPP loans.~~$365 thousand. Included in salaries and employee benefits is share-based compensation expense of $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, and $3.2 million for the year ended December 31, ~~2020, and $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.~~2020.

Net occupancy and equipment: Net occupancy and equipment includes expenses related to the use of premises and equipment, such as depreciation, operating lease payments, repairs and maintenance, insurance, property taxes and utilities, net of incidental rental income of excess facilities. The increase is ~~partly~~primarily related to the ~~inclusion of a full year of expenses related to~~October 2021 ASBI acquisition, the ~~MidFirst~~December 2021 Security acquisition, and the ~~subsequent addition~~full year effect of ~~three~~the two additional locations ~~and~~related to the October 2020 Almena ~~acquisition added two more bank locations.~~acquisition.

Data processing: The increase was principally due to ~~additional~~ increased software license expenses of $1.1 million, $717 thousand in data processing/debit card expense and online account processing ~~costs as usage increased, so did software license expense.~~expenses of $417 thousand.

Professional fees: The ~~decrease~~increase of ~~$452~~$431 thousand ~~or 9.5%,~~was principally is due to ~~a decrease~~increases in attorney fees of ~~$527~~$454 thousand ~~advisor~~and consulting services of ~~$452 thousand and regulatory assessments of $32~~$384 thousand, partially offset by ~~an increase~~a decrease in accounting fees of ~~$418 thousand and consulting fees of $141~~$353 thousand.

Other real estate owned: As detailed in “NOTE 5 – OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, other real estate owned expenses, including provision for unrealized losses, were $1.3 million, partially offset by gains on sale and transfer to other real estate of $1.0 million and income from other real estate owned properties of $473 thousand, for the year ended December 31, 2021. For the year ended December 31, 2020, other real estate owned expenses including provision for unrealized losses, were $3.3 million, partially offset by gains on the sale of other real estate of $835 thousand and ~~gains on the sale of other assets of $201 thousand, for the year ended December 31, 2020. For the year ended December 31, 2019,~~income from other real estate owned expenses, including provision for unrealized losses, were $904 thousand and loss on sale of other real estate owned was $10 thousand, partially offset by gains on initial evaluation of other real estate properties of ~~$191 thousand and gains on the sale of other assets of $15~~$201 thousand.

Other: Other non-interest expenses ~~consist~~consists of subscriptions, memberships and dues, employee expenses, including travel, meals, entertainment and education, supplies, printing, insurance, account related losses, correspondent bank fees, customer program expenses, losses net of gains on the sale of fixed assets, losses net of gains on the sale of repossessed assets other than real estate, ~~and~~ other operating expenses, such as settlement of ~~claims.~~claims, limited partnership tax credits and provision for unfunded commitments.

Merger expenses: Merger expenses include legal, advisory and accounting fees associated with services to facilitate the acquisition of other banks. Merger expenses also include data processing conversion costs and costs associated with the integration of personnel, processes, facilities and employee bonuses. During 2021, the company incurred merger expenses of $237 thousand related to the Almena acquisition, $8.7 million related to the ASBI acquisition and $289 thousand related to the Security acquisition. For the year ended December 31, 2020, merger expenses of $299 thousand are related to the Almena acquisition. ~~For the year ended December 31, 2019, merger expenses of $915 thousand are related to the MidFirst acquisition.~~

The efficiency ratio is a supplemental financial measure utilized in the internal evaluation of our performance and is not defined under GAAP. Our efficiency ratio is computed by dividing non-interest expense, excluding goodwill impairment, merger expenses and loss on debt extinguishment, by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income, excluding net gains on sales of and settlement of securities and gain on acquisition. Generally, an increase in the efficiency ratio indicates that more resources are being utilized to generate the same volume of income, while a decrease would indicate a more efficient allocation of resources. The ratio defined under GAAP that is most comparable to the efficiency ratio is non-interest expense to net interest income plus non-interest income which is discussed in “Results of Operations – Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

The Company’s non-interest expense, less goodwill impairment, to net interest income plus non-interest income ~~decreased~~increased from ~~year~~the period ended December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, to December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, primarily due to net interest income plus non-interest income increasing at a ~~higher~~lower rate than non-interest expense less goodwill impairment, as discussed in “Results of Operations – Non-GAAP Financial Measures.” The efficiency ratio ~~increased slightly~~decreased during the same time period due to non-interest expense, excluding goodwill impairment and merger expenses, increasing inat a ~~slightly higher~~lower proportional rate than net interest income and non-interest income, excluding net gains on security transactions and gain on acquisition, as discussed in “Results of Operations – Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin Analysis” and “Results of Operations – Non-Interest Income.”

The amount of income tax expense is influenced by the amount of pre-tax income, the amount of tax-exempt income, the amount of non-deductible expenses and available tax credits.

Year ended December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, compared with year ended December 31, ~~2019~~2020

The effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, was ~~(0.5)%~~18.5% as compared to the U.S. statutory rate of 21.0%. The effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, was ~~22.2%~~(0.5)% as compared to the U.S. statutory rate of 21.0%. As detailed in “NOTE 15 – INCOME TAXES” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the income tax rates differed from the U.S. statutory rates primarily due to non-taxable income, non-deductible expenses, non-deductible goodwill and tax credits. The Company made an investment in solar tax credits during the year ended December 31, 2021, which materially affected the effective income tax rate for the period.

Our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this annual report have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. These require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering changes in the relative value of money over time due to inflation or recession.

Unlike many industrial companies, substantially all our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a more significant impact on our performance than the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rates may not necessarily move in the same direction or in the same magnitude as the prices of goods and services. However, other operating expenses do reflect general levels of inflation.

Our total assets increased ~~$63.8 million,~~$1.12 billion, or ~~1.6%~~28.0%, from ~~$3.95 billion at December 31, 2019, to~~ $4.01 billion at December 31, ~~2020.~~2020, to $5.14 billion at December 31, 2021. The increase in total assets was primarily from increases in ~~cash and cash equivalents~~securities of ~~$191.4~~$455.6 million, ~~partially offset by decreases in goodwill~~loans of ~~$104.8~~$549.3 million and ~~investment securities~~other assets of ~~$39.3~~$67.4 million. Our total liabilities increased ~~$134.2 million,~~$1.03 billion, or ~~3.9%~~28.6%, from ~~$3.47 billion at December 31, 2019, to~~ $3.61 billion at December 31, ~~2020.~~2020, to $4.64 billion at December 31, 2021. The increase in total liabilities was from increases in total deposits of ~~$384.1~~$972.4 million, other liabilities of $28.3 million and subordinated debt of ~~$73.1~~$8.2 million, somewhat offset by decreases in FHLB advances of ~~$314.2 million and bank stock loan of $9.0~~$10.1 million. Our total stockholders’ equity ~~decreased $70.4 mill1ion,~~increased $93.0 million, or ~~14.7%~~22.8%, from ~~$478.1 million at December 31, 2019, to~~ $407.6 million at December 31, ~~2020.~~2020, to $500.6 million at December 31, 2021.

Loans are the largest category of earning assets and typically provide higher yields than other types of earning assets. Excluding the ~~Almena acquisition,~~acquired loan balances at year end, gross loans held for investment increased by ~~$3.6~~$165.5 million, or ~~0.1%~~6.4%, compared with December 31, ~~2019.~~2020. Growth consisted of ~~$142.4~~$133.3 million, or ~~24.1%, from commercial and industrial, $59.9 million, or 6.5%~~11.2%, from commercial real estate, ~~and $1.4~~$10.4 million, or ~~1.5%~~11.0%, from agricultural, ~~offset by decreases of $121.5~~$219.9 million, or ~~24.1%~~57.6%, from residential real estate, ~~$29.3~~$25.8 million, or ~~12.6%, from real estate construction, $9.8 million, or 14.4%~~44.0%, from consumer, and ~~$8.2~~$3.1 million, or ~~5.8%~~2.3%, from agricultural real ~~estate.~~estate, offset by a decrease of $227.0 million, or 30.9%, from commercial and industrial. We also had ~~an increase~~a decrease in loans classified as held for sale of ~~$6.5~~$8.2 million, or ~~108.9%~~66.0%, from ~~December 31, 2019, to~~ December 31, 2020.

Our loan portfolio consists of various types of loans, most of which are made to borrowers located in the Wichita, Kansas City and Tulsa MSAs, as well as various community markets throughout Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma. Although the portfolio is diversified and generally secured by various types of collateral, the majority of our loan portfolio consists of commercial and industrial and commercial real estate loans and a substantial portion of our borrowers’ ability to honor their obligations is dependent on local economic conditions in Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma. As of December 31, ~~2020, there was no~~2021, the only industry with a concentration of loans ~~to any one type~~in excess of ~~industry exceeding~~ 10% of total ~~loans.~~loans was the hospitality industry, comprising 11.5% of total loans excluding SBA PPP.

At December 31, 2021, gross total loans were 71.5% of deposits and 61.5% of total assets. At December 31, 2020, gross total loans were 75.5% ~~of deposits and 64.9% of total assets. At December 31, 2019, gross total loans were 83.6%~~ of deposits and 64.9% of total assets.

The organic, or non-acquired, growth in our loan portfolio is attributable to our ability to attract new customers from other financial institutions and overall growth in our markets. Our lending staff has been successful in building banking relationships with new customers. Several new lenders have been hired in our markets and these employees have been successful in transitioning their former clients and attracting new clients. Lending activities originate from the efforts of our lenders with an emphasis on lending to individuals, professionals, small to medium-sized businesses and commercial companies located in the Wichita, Kansas City and Tulsa MSAs, as well as community markets in Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma.

The following table summarizes our loan portfolio by type of loan as of the dates indicated.

	December 31,																									December 31,
	2020					2019					2018					2017					2016					2021					2020					2019
	Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent
	(Dollars in thousands)																									(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	734,495		28.3	%	$	592,052		23.2	%	$	582,527		22.6	%	$	521,510		24.6	%	$	348,465		25.2	%	$	567,497		18.0	%	$	734,495		28.3	%	$	592,052		23.2	%
Real estate loans:
Commercial real estate		986,288		38.1	%		926,355		36.2	%		1,127,646		43.8	%		801,491		37.8	%		478,815		34.6	%		1,486,148		47.1	%		1,188,696		45.9	%		1,158,022		45.3	%
Real estate construction		202,408		7.8	%		231,667		9.1	%		124,346		4.8	%		186,170		8.8	%		114,293		8.3	%
Residential real estate		381,958		14.7	%		503,439		19.7	%		444,540		17.3	%		376,705		17.8	%		338,387		24.4	%		638,087		20.2	%		381,958		14.7	%		503,439		19.7	%
Agricultural real estate		133,693		5.2	%		141,868		5.5	%		139,332		5.4	%		86,486		4.1	%		38,331		2.8	%		198,330		6.3	%		133,693		5.2	%		141,868		5.5	%
Total real estate loans		1,704,347		65.8	%		1,803,329		70.5	%		1,835,864		71.3	%		1,450,852		68.5	%		969,826		70.1	%		2,322,565		73.6	%		1,704,347		65.8	%		1,803,329		70.5	%
Agricultural																											166,975		5.3	%		94,322		3.6	%		92,893		3.6	%
Consumer		58,532		2.3	%		68,378		2.7	%		62,894		2.4	%		49,361		2.4	%		40,902		2.9	%		98,590		3.1	%		58,532		2.3	%		68,378		2.7	%
Agricultural		94,322		3.6	%		92,893		3.6	%		94,123		3.7	%		95,547		4.5	%		24,412		1.8	%
Total loans held for investment	$	2,591,696		100.0	%	$	2,556,652		100.0	%	$	2,575,408		100.0	%	$	2,117,270		100.0	%	$	1,383,605		100.0	%	$	3,155,627		94.7	%	$	2,591,696		96.4	%	$	2,556,652		96.4	%
Total loans held for sale	$	12,394		100.0	%	$	5,933		100.0	%	$	2,972		100.0	%	$	2,353		100.0	%	$	4,830		100.0	%	$	4,214		100.0	%	$	12,394		100.0	%	$	5,933		100.0	%
Total loans held for investment (net of allowances)	$	2,557,987		100.0	%	$	2,544,420		100.0	%	$	2,563,954		100.0	%	$	2,108,772		100.0	%	$	1,377,173		100.0	%	$	3,107,262		100.0	%	$	2,557,987		100.0	%	$	2,544,420		100.0	%

Commercial and industrial: Commercial and industrial loans include loans used to purchase fixed assets, to provide working capital or meet other financing needs of the business. Of the $142.4 million in growth during 2020, $6.1 million, or 4.3%, was a result of loans acquired through the Almena acquisition. The remainder was a combination of loan originations within our target markets and changes in the balances of revolving lines of credit, partially offset by reductions of broadly syndicated shared national credit originations and mortgage finance loan participations.

Commercial real estate: Commercial real estate loans include all loans secured by nonfarm nonresidential properties and by multifamily residential properties, as well as 1-4 family investment-purpose real estate loans. Of the ~~$59.9~~$297.5 million in growth during ~~2020, $5.5~~2021, $164.1 million, or ~~9.2%~~55.2%, was a result of loans acquired through ~~the Almena acquisition.~~

~~Real estate construction:~~ ~~Real estate construction loans include loans made for the purpose of acquisition, development, or construction of real property, both commercial and consumer.~~acquisitions.

Residential real estate: Residential real estate loans include loans secured by primary or secondary personal residences. ~~The Almena acquisition~~Acquisitions added ~~$3.3~~$36.3 million in residential real estate loans during the year ended December 31, ~~2020.~~2021. During ~~2020,~~2021, we purchased ~~one pool~~six pools of residential real estate mortgage loans totaling ~~$752 thousand.~~$363.9 million. Pools of mortgages are occasionally purchased to expand our loan portfolio and provide additional loan income.

Agricultural real estate, Agricultural, Consumer and other: Agricultural real estate loans are loans related to farmland. Agricultural loans are primarily operating lines subject to annual farming revenues including productivity/yield of the agricultural commodities produced. Consumer loans are generally secured by consumer assets but may be unsecured. The ~~Almena acquisition~~ASBI and Security acquisitions added ~~$10.5~~$62.2 million in agricultural, ~~$4.1~~$61.5 million in agricultural real estate, and ~~$1.8~~$14.3 million in consumer loans during the year ended December 31, ~~2020.~~2021. These three loan types represent ~~11.1%~~14.7% of our overall loan portfolio.

The contractual maturity ranges of loans in our loan portfolio and the amount of such loans with predetermined interest rates and floating rates in each maturity range as of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, and December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, are summarized in the following tables.

	As of December 31, 2020								As of December 31, 2021
	One year or less		After one year through five years		After five years		Total		One year or less		After one year through five years		After five years through fifteen years		After fifteen years		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)								(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	157,313	$	487,729	$	89,453	$	734,495	$	172,409	$	300,312	$	88,124	$	6,652	$	567,497
Real Estate:
Commercial real estate		144,627		569,366		272,295		986,288		247,339		834,277		355,479		49,053		1,486,148
Real estate construction		75,659		76,295		50,454		202,408
Residential real estate		5,048		9,848		367,062		381,958		6,594		14,066		136,994		480,433		638,087
Agricultural real estate		50,527		56,514		26,652		133,693		53,703		83,861		47,176		13,590		198,330
Total real estate		275,861		712,023		716,463		1,704,347		307,636		932,204		539,649		543,076		2,322,565
Agricultural										113,138		41,003		6,809		6,025		166,975
Consumer		13,804		37,599		7,129		58,532		36,714		40,361		18,352		3,163		98,590
Agricultural		62,804		25,911		5,607		94,322
Total	$	509,782	$	1,263,262	$	818,652	$	2,591,696	$	629,897	$	1,313,880	$	652,934	$	558,916	$	3,155,627
Loans with a predetermined fixed interest rate	$	261,736	$	896,899	$	291,649	$	1,450,284	$	258,334	$	875,796	$	235,609	$	334,122	$	1,703,861
Loans with an adjustable/floating interest rate		248,046		366,363		527,003		1,141,412		371,563		438,084		417,325		224,794		1,451,766
Total	$	509,782	$	1,263,262	$	818,652	$	2,591,696	$	629,897	$	1,313,880	$	652,934	$	558,916	$	3,155,627

	As of December 31, 2019								As of December 31, 2020
	One year or less		After one year through five years		After five years		Total		One year or less		After one year through five years		After five years through fifteen years		After fifteen years		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)								(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	226,524	$	232,364	$	133,164	$	592,052	$	157,313	$	487,729	$	87,979	$	1,474	$	734,495
Real Estate:
Commercial real estate		144,787		487,280		294,288		926,355		220,286		645,661		288,248		34,501		1,188,696
Real estate construction		64,528		114,606		52,533		231,667
Residential real estate		7,357		11,885		484,197		503,439		5,048		9,848		85,123		281,939		381,958
Agricultural real estate		56,064		52,324		33,480		141,868		50,527		56,514		19,381		7,271		133,693
Total real estate		272,736		666,095		864,498		1,803,329		275,861		712,023		392,752		323,711		1,704,347
Agricultural										62,804		25,911		2,914		2,693		94,322
Consumer		16,268		43,844		8,266		68,378		13,804		37,599		5,616		1,513		58,532
Agricultural		73,487		17,786		1,620		92,893
Total	$	589,015	$	960,089	$	1,007,548	$	2,556,652	$	509,782	$	1,263,262	$	489,261	$	329,391	$	2,591,696
Loans with a predetermined fixed interest rate	$	284,218	$	587,715	$	326,017	$	1,197,950	$	261,736	$	896,899	$	193,889	$	97,760	$	1,450,284
Loans with an adjustable/floating interest rate		304,797		372,374		681,531		1,358,702		248,046		366,363		295,372		231,631		1,141,412
Total	$	589,015	$	960,089	$	1,007,548	$	2,556,652	$	509,782	$	1,263,262	$	489,261	$	329,391	$	2,591,696

The following table presents information regarding nonperforming assets at the dates indicated.

	As of December 31,															As of December 31,
	2020			2019			2018			2017			2016			2021			2020			2019
	(Dollars in thousands)																		(Dollars in thousands)
Nonaccrual loans	$	43,689		$	38,379		$	33,203		$	40,276		$	22,693		$	29,361		$	43,689		$	38,379
Accruing loans 90 or more days past due		143			—			18		—			—				256			143			—
Restructured loans-accruing		—			—		—				—			—			—			—			—
OREO acquired through foreclosure, net		10,698			8,293			6,372			7,907			8,656			7,582			10,698			8,293
Other repossessed assets		67			236			56			5			53			28,799			67			236
Total nonperforming assets	$	54,597		$	46,908		$	39,649		$	48,188		$	31,402		$	65,998		$	54,597		$	46,908
Ratios:
Nonperforming assets to total assets		1.36	%		1.19	%		0.98	%		1.52	%		1.43	%		1.28	%		1.36	%		1.19	%
Nonperforming assets to total loans plus OREO		2.10	%		1.83	%		1.54	%		2.27	%		2.26	%		2.09	%		2.10	%		1.83	%

Nonperforming assets (“NPAs”) include loans on nonaccrual status, accruing loans 90 or more days past due, restructured loans, other real estate acquired through foreclosure and other repossessed assets.

The nonperforming loans at December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, consisted of ~~232~~176 separate credits and ~~158~~137 separate borrowers. We had ~~eight~~nine nonperforming loan relationships each with outstanding balances exceeding $1.0 million as of December 31, ~~2020.~~2021. Of the increase in nonperforming assets, ~~$8.7~~$2.5 million was a result of the ~~Almena~~ASBI acquisition. There are several procedures in place to assist us in maintaining the overall quality of our loan portfolio. We have established underwriting guidelines to be followed by lenders and we also monitor delinquency levels for any negative or adverse trends. There can be no assurance, however, that our loan portfolio will not become subject to increasing pressures from deteriorating borrower credit due to general economic conditions.

We categorize loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information and current economic trends, among other factors. Loans are analyzed individually and classified based on credit risk. Consumer loans are considered pass credits unless downgraded due to payment status or reviewed as part of a larger credit relationship. We use the following definitions for risk ratings:

Pass: Loans classified as pass include all loans that do not fall under one of the three following categories. These loans are considered unclassified.

Special Mention: Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of our credit position at some future date. These loans are considered classified.

Substandard: Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. These loans are considered classified.

Doubtful: Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, based on currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. These loans are considered classified.

Potential problem loans consist of loans that are performing in accordance with contractual terms, but for which management has concerns about the borrower’s ability to comply with repayment terms because of the borrower’s potential financial difficulties. Potential problem loans are assigned a grade of special mention or substandard. At December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the Company had ~~$52.3~~$72.5 million in potential problem loans which were not included in either non-accrual or 90 days past due categories, compared to ~~$27.2~~$52.3 million at December 31, ~~2019.~~2020.

~~The~~For additional information about the risk category ~~of loans~~ by class of loans ~~is as follows for~~see “NOTE 4 – LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. At December 31, ~~2020, and~~2021, loans considered unclassified increased to 96.8% of total loans from 96.3% of total loans at December 31, ~~2019.~~2020.

	As of December 31, 2020						As of December 31, 2021
	Unclassified		Classified		Total		Unclassified		Classified		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)						(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	674,392	$	60,103	$	734,495	$	530,783	$	36,714	$	567,497
Real estate:
Commercial real estate		969,560		16,728		986,288		1,454,547		31,601		1,486,148
Real estate construction		202,401		7		202,408
Residential real estate		378,868		3,090		381,958		632,974		5,113		638,087
Agricultural real estate		125,425		8,268		133,693		184,428		13,902		198,330
Total real estate		1,676,254		28,093		1,704,347		2,271,949		50,616		2,322,565
Agricultural								152,498		14,477		166,975
Consumer		58,253		279		58,532		98,267		323		98,590
Agricultural		86,629		7,693		94,322
Total	$	2,495,528	$	96,168	$	2,591,696	$	3,053,497	$	102,130	$	3,155,627

	As of December 31, 2019						As of December 31, 2020
	Unclassified		Classified		Total		Unclassified		Classified		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)						(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	560,282	$	31,770	$	592,052	$	674,392	$	60,103	$	734,495
Real estate:
Commercial real estate		916,685		9,670		926,355		1,171,961		16,735		1,188,696
Real estate construction		230,011		1,656		231,667
Residential real estate		495,418		8,021		503,439		378,868		3,090		381,958
Agricultural real estate		132,065		9,803		141,868		125,425		8,268		133,693
Total real estate		1,774,179		29,150		1,803,329		1,676,254		28,093		1,704,347
Agricultural								86,629		7,693		94,322
Consumer		67,997		381		68,378		58,253		279		58,532
Agricultural		88,607		4,286		92,893
Total	$	2,491,065	$	65,587	$	2,556,652	$	2,495,528	$	96,168	$	2,591,696

At December 31, ~~2020, loans considered unclassified decreased to 96.3% of total loans from 97.4% of total loans at December 31, 2019.~~

~~At December 31, 2020,~~2021, the Company had ~~$60.9~~$36.3 million, or ~~2.6%~~1.2%, of total loans excluding PPP loans participating in the payment deferral program. For additional information see “NOTE 4 – LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR ~~LOAN~~CREDIT LOSSES” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

In accordance with applicable regulation, appraisals or evaluations are required to independently value real estate and, as an important element, to consider when underwriting loans secured in part or in whole by real estate. The value of real estate collateral provides additional support to the borrower’s credit capacity.

With respect to potential problem loans, all monitored and under-performing loans are reviewed and evaluated to determine if they are impaired. If we determine that a loan is impaired, then we evaluate the borrower’s overall financial condition to determine the need, if any, for possible write downs or appropriate additions to the allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses based on the unlikelihood of full repayment of principal and interest in accordance with the contractual terms or the net realizable value of the pledged collateral.

Please see “Critical Accounting Policies – Allowance for ~~Loan~~Credit Losses” for additional discussion of our allowance policy.

In connection with our review of the loan portfolio, risk elements attributable to particular loan types or categories are considered when assessing the quality of individual loans. For additional information see “NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Purchased credit ~~impaired~~deteriorated loans: Please see “Critical Accounting Policies – Allowance for ~~Loan~~Credit Losses” for additional discussion of our purchased credit ~~impaired~~deteriorated loans policy. In accordance with ASC 326, the credit impairment mark on acquired loans was reclassified from loans to the allowance for credit losses, effective January 1, 2021. After adoption of the standard, the allowance for credit losses is increased by the reserve calculated on newly acquired purchased credit deteriorated assets at the date of acquisition. Subsequent changes to the allowance on these loans are recorded through the provision for loan losses. For additional information about our purchased credit ~~impaired~~deteriorated loans see “NOTE 4 – LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR ~~LOAN~~CREDIT LOSSES” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Analysis of allowance for ~~loan and lease~~credit losses: At December 31, 2021, the allowance for credit losses totaled $48.4 million, or 1.53% of total loans. At December 31, 2020, the allowance for loan losses totaled $33.7 million, or 1.30% of total loans. ~~At December 31, 2019, the allowance for loan losses aggregated $12.2 million, or 0.48% of total loans.~~

The allowance for loan losses on loans collectively evaluated for impairment totaled $23.2 million, or 0.92%, of the $2.54 billion in loans collectively evaluated for impairment at December 31, 2020, compared to an allowance for loan losses of $11.0 million, or 0.44%, of the $2.50 billion in loans collectively evaluated for impairment at December 31, 2019, and an allowance for loan losses of $9.6 million, or 0.38%, of the $2.51 billion in loans collectively evaluated for impairment at December 31, 2018. The increase in allowance as a percentage of total loans and of loans collectively evaluated for impairment from December 31, 2019, to December 31, 2020, principally reflect management’s evaluation of current environmental conditions and changes in the composition and quality of our loan portfolio.

Net losses as a percentage of average loans was 0.10% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, as compared to 0.68% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, and 0.04% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018.

~~There have been no material changes to our accounting policies related to our allowance for loan and lease loss methodology during 2020 and 2019.~~

~~We will be adopting~~Company adopted CECL effective January 1, ~~2021, and have estimated the impact from~~2021. The adoption ~~related to loans held for investment to range from a $30.0 million to $40.0 million increase to~~resulted in increases in the allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) on loans held for investment of $15,732, an ACL for unfunded commitments of $838, a ~~$4.0 million to $6.4 million increase to~~ deferred tax asset of $4,167, a reclassification of purchased-impaired discounts from loans to ACL of $10,438 and a ~~$12.0 million to $19.6 million~~ decrease toin retained ~~earnings. The increase in the allowance for credit loss noted above includes a $14.0 million reclassification~~earnings of ~~purchased credit impaired non-accretable discount to the allowance for credit losses.~~$12,403. For additional information about the adoption of CECL see “NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

74The allowance for credit losses on loans collectively evaluated totaled $34.3 million, or 1.14%, of the $3.1 billion in loans collectively evaluated at December 31, 2021, compared to an allowance for loan losses of $23.2 million, or 0.92%, of the $2.54 billion in loans collectively evaluated at December 31, 2020, and an allowance for loan losses of $11.0 million, or 0.44%, of the $2.50 billion in loans collectively evaluated at December 31, 2019. The increase in allowance as a percentage of total loans and of loans collectively evaluated from December 31, 2020, to December 31, 2021, was driven by the CECL which introduced a life of loan concept to the calculation and resulted in a significant increase in reserves as previously indicated. Following adoption, the level of reserve has declined due primarily to improving economic circumstances in the markets in which the Company operates as we continue to move away from the peak of the pandemic partially offset by increasing estimated exposure at default, loss experience within our historical loss calculation and extension of expected life of the underlying portfolio.

Net losses as a percentage of average loans was 0.30% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2021, as compared to 0.10% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, and 0.68% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019.

The following table presents, as of and for the periods indicated, an analysis of the allowance for ~~loan and lease~~credit losses and other related data.

As of and for the Twelve Months
ended December 31,

��
2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

(Dollars in thousands)

Average loans outstanding⁽¹⁾

$
2,689,463

$
2,602,050

$
2,386,267

$
1,573,402

$
1,006,745

Gross loans outstanding at end of period⁽¹⁾

$
2,591,696

$
2,556,652

$
2,575,408

$
2,117,270

$
1,383,605

Allowance for loan and lease losses at beginning of the period

$
12,232

$
11,454

$
8,498

$
6,432

$
5,506

Provision for loan losses

24,255

18,354

3,961

2,953

2,119

Charge-offs:

Commercial and industrial

(1,304
)

(13,911
)

(118
)

(431
)

(226
)
Real estate:

Commercial real estate

(228
)

(2,178
)

(121
)

(271
)

(557
)
Real estate construction

(193
)

—

(1,658
)

—

—

Residential real estate

(446
)

(1,077
)

(293
)

(350
)

(299
)
Agricultural real estate

(191
)

(43
)

(93
)

(16
)

(23
)
Consumer

(949
)

(1,394
)

(1,431
)

(1,025
)

(584
)
Agricultural

(11
)

(87
)

(43
)

(42
)

(31
)
Total charge-offs

(3,322
)

(18,690
)

(3,757
)

(2,135
)

(1,720
)
Recoveries:

Commercial and industrial

56

72

53

35

41

Real estate:

Commercial real estate

8

101

304

660

201

Real estate construction

194

24

1,565

—

—

Residential real estate

45

492

254

243

165

Agricultural real estate

18

47

19

13

23

Consumer

215

359

545

291

96

Agricultural

8

19

12

6

1

Total recoveries

544

1,114

2,752

1,248

527

Net recoveries (charge-offs)

(2,778
)

(17,576
)

(1,005
)

(887
)

(1,193
)
Allowance for loan and lease losses at end of the period

$
33,709

$
12,232

$
11,454

$
8,498

$
6,432

Ratio of ALLL to end of period loans⁽¹⁾

1.30
%

0.48
%

0.44
%

0.40
%

0.46
%
Ratio of net charge-offs (recoveries)
to average loans

0.10
%

0.68
%

0.04
%

0.06
%

0.12
%

December 31, 2021	Commercial Real Estate			Commercial and Industrial			Residential Real Estate			Agricultural Real Estate			Agricultural			Consumer			Total
Allowance for credit losses	$	22,478		$	12,248		$	5,560		$	2,235		$	3,756		$	2,088		$	48,365
Total loans outstanding		1,486,148			567,497			638,087			198,330			166,975			98,590			3,155,627
Net charge-offs		(129	)		7,870			(52	)		473			(21	)		504			8,645
Average loan balance		1,317,750			714,561			491,747			153,607			108,276			88,383			2,874,324
Non-accrual loan balance		6,833			6,557			5,075			4,398			6,175			323			29,361
Loans to total loans outstanding		47.1	%		18.0	%		20.2	%		6.3	%		5.3	%		3.1	%		100.0	%
ACL to total loans		1.5	%		2.2	%		0.9	%		1.1	%		2.2	%		2.1	%		1.5	%
Net charge-offs to average loans		—	%		1.1	%		—	%		0.3	%		—	%		0.6	%		0.3	%
Non-accrual loans to total loans		0.5	%		1.2	%		0.8	%		2.2	%		3.7	%		0.3	%		0.9	%
ACL to non-accrual loans		329.0	%		186.8	%		109.6	%		50.8	%		60.8	%		646.4	%		164.7	%

December 31, 2020	Commercial Real Estate			Commercial and Industrial			Residential Real Estate			Agricultural Real Estate			Agricultural			Consumer			Total
Allowance for loan losses	$	9,012		$	12,456		$	4,559		$	904		$	758		$	6,020		$	33,709
Total loans outstanding		1,188,696			734,495			381,958			133,693			94,322			58,532			2,591,696
Net charge-offs		219			1,248			401			173			3			734			2,778
Average loan balance		1,190,097			763,971			443,312			133,813			88,206			70,064			2,689,463
Non-accrual loan balance		7,582			23,457			2,955			4,111			5,312			272			43,689
Loans to total loans outstanding		45.9	%		28.3	%		14.7	%		5.2	%		3.6	%		2.3	%		100.0	%
ACL to total loans		0.8	%		1.7	%		1.2	%		0.7	%		0.8	%		10.3	%		1.3	%
Net charge-offs to average loans		—	%		0.2	%		0.1	%		0.1	%		—	%		1.0	%		0.1	%
Non-accrual loans to total loans		0.6	%		3.2	%		0.8	%		3.1	%		5.6	%		0.5	%		1.7	%
ACL to non-accrual loans		118.9	%		53.1	%		154.3	%		22.0	%		14.3	%		2213.2	%		77.2	%

December 31, 2019	Commercial Real Estate			Commercial and Industrial			Residential Real Estate			Agricultural Real Estate			Agricultural			Consumer			Total
Allowance for loan losses	$	3,919		$	3,061		$	2,676		$	608		$	546		$	1,422		$	12,232
Total loans outstanding		1,158,022			592,052			503,439			141,868			92,893			68,378			2,556,652
Net charge-offs		2,053			13,839			585			(4	)		1,035			68			17,576
Average loan balance		1,224,804			567,215			513,529			140,365			85,747			70,390			2,602,050
Non-accrual loan balance		6,913			16,906			8,013			4,807			1,359			381			38,379
Loans to total loans outstanding		45.3	%		23.2	%		19.7	%		5.5	%		3.6	%		2.7	%		100.0	%
ACL to total loans		0.3	%		0.5	%		0.5	%		0.4	%		0.6	%		2.1	%		0.5	%
Net charge-offs to average loans		0.2	%		2.4	%		0.1	%		—	%		1.2	%		0.1	%		0.7	%
Non-accrual loans to total loans		0.6	%		2.9	%		1.6	%		3.4	%		1.5	%		0.6	%		1.5	%
ACL to non-accrual loans		56.7	%		18.1	%		33.4	%		12.6	%		40.2	%		373.2	%		31.9	%

The following table shows the allocation of the allowance for loan losses among our loan categories and certain other information as of the dates indicated. The total allowance is available to absorb losses from any loan or lease category.

Management believes that the allowance for ~~loan and lease~~credit losses at December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, is adequate to cover ~~probable incurred~~current expected losses in the loan portfolio as of such date. There can be no assurance, however, that we will not sustain losses in future periods that could be substantial in relation to the size of the allowance at December 31, ~~2020.~~2021.

We use our securities portfolio to provide a source of liquidity, to provide an appropriate return on funds invested, to manage interest rate risk, to meet pledging requirements and to meet regulatory capital requirements. At December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, securities represented ~~21.7%~~25.8% of total assets compared with ~~23.1%~~21.7% at December 31, ~~2019.~~2020.

At the date of purchase, debt securities are classified into one of two categories, held-to-maturity or available-for-sale. We do not purchase securities for trading purposes. At each reporting date, the appropriateness of the classification is reassessed. Investments in debt securities are classified as held-to-maturity and carried at cost, adjusted for the amortization of premiums and the accretion of discounts, in the financial statements only if management has the positive intent and ability to hold those securities to maturity. Debt securities not classified as held-to-maturity are classified as available-for-sale and measured at fair value in the financial statements with unrealized gains and losses reported, net of tax, as accumulated comprehensive income or loss until realized. Interest earned on securities is included in total interest and dividend income. Also included in total interest and dividend income are dividends received on stock investments in the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City and the FHLB of Topeka. These stock investments are stated at cost.

The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value by classification of available-for-sale securities as of the dates shown.

	December 31,												December 31,
	2020				2019				2018				2021				2020
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(Dollars in thousands)												(Dollars in thousands)
U.S. government-sponsored entities	$	996	$	1,023	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
U.S. treasury securities		4,024		4,025	—		—		—		—
U.S. Government-sponsored entities													$	124,898	$	123,407	$	996	$	1,023
U.S. Treasury securities														157,289		155,602		4,024		4,025
Mortgage-backed securities
Government-sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities		630,485		651,425		141,082		142,067		173,503		168,875		661,584		664,887		630,485		651,425
Private label residential mortgage-backed securities		44,302		44,178	—		—		—		—			173,717		171,688		44,302		44,178
Corporate		52,503		53,650	—		—		—		—			52,555		53,777		52,503		53,650
Small Business Administration loan pools		1,226		1,270	—		—		—		—			16,568		16,475		1,226		1,270
State and local subdivisions		111,865		116,256	—		—		—		—			138,404		141,606		111,865		116,256
Total available-for-sale securities	$	845,401	$	871,827	$	141,082	$	142,067	$	173,503	$	168,875	$	1,325,015	$	1,327,442	$	845,401	$	871,827

~~The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value by classification of held-to-maturity securities as of the dates shown.~~

At December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we did not own securities of any one issuer (other than the U.S. government and its agencies or sponsored entities) for which aggregate adjusted cost exceeded 10% of the consolidated stockholders’ equity at the reporting dates noted.

The following tables summarize the contractual maturity of debt securities and their weighted average yields as of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, and December 31, ~~2019.~~2020. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Securities not due at a single maturity date, primarily mortgage-backed securities, are shown separately. Available-for-sale securities are shown at fair value and held-to-maturity securities are shown at cost, adjusted for the amortization of premiums and the accretion of discounts.

	December 31, 2020																									December 31, 2021
	Due in one year or less					Due after one year through five years					Due after five years through 10 years					Due after 10 years					Total					Due in one year or less					Due after one year through five years					Due after five years through ten years					Due after 10 years					Total
	Carrying Value		Yield			Carrying Value		Yield			Carrying Value		Yield			Carrying Value		Yield			Carrying Value		Yield			Carrying Value		Yield			Carrying Value		Yield			Carrying Value		Yield			Carrying Value		Yield			Carrying Value		Yield
	(Dollars in thousands)																									(Dollars in thousands)
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. government-sponsored entities	$	—		—	%	$	1,023		2.78	%	$	—		—	%	$	—		—	%	$	1,023		2.78	%
U.S. treasury securities		4,025		0.14	%		—		—	%		—		—	%		—		—	%		4,025		0.14	%
U.S. Government-sponsored entities																										$	1,001		2.78	%	$	29,524		0.50	%	$	84,810		1.37	%	$	8,072		1.89	%	$	123,407		1.21	%
U.S. Treasury securities																											—		—	%		48,008		1.14	%		107,594		1.10	%		—		—	%	$	155,602		1.11	%
Mortgage-backed securities
Government-sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities		5		5.77	%		2,093		3.26	%		101,352		2.12	%		547,975		2.10	%		651,425		2.10	%		—		—	%		69,734		1.35	%		211,965		1.65	%		383,188		2.05	%	$	664,887		1.85	%
Private label residential mortgage-backed securities		—		—	%		—		—	%		—		—	%		44,178		0.23	%		44,178		0.23	%		—		—	%		—		—	%		—		—	%		171,688		1.62	%	$	171,688		1.62	%
Corporate		5,050		2.17	%		—		—	%		48,600		4.25	%		—		—	%		53,650		4.05	%		—		—	%		—		—	%		53,777		4.18	%		—		—	%	$	53,777		4.18	%
Small Business Administration loan pools		—		—	%		—		—	%		—		—	%		1,270		2.38	%		1,270		2.38	%		—		—	%		—		—	%		9,669		0.93	%		6,806		1.76	%	$	16,475		1.27	%
State and political subdivisions⁽¹⁾		3,765		2.41	%		26,679		2.45	%		24,212		2.93	%		61,600		3.17	%		116,256		2.93	%
State and political subdivisions⁽¹⁾																											7,259		2.60	%		21,038		2.43	%		44,640		2.26	%		68,669		2.36	%	$	141,606		2.35	%
Total available-for-sale securities		12,845		1.61	%		29,795		2.52	%		174,164		2.83	%		655,023		2.07	%		871,827		2.23	%		8,260		2.62	%		168,304		1.28	%		512,455		1.79	%		638,423		1.96	%		1,327,442		1.81	%
Total debt securities	$	12,845		1.61	%	$	29,795		2.52	%	$	174,164		2.83	%	$	655,023		2.07	%	$	871,827		2.23	%	$	8,260		2.62	%	$	168,304		1.28	%	$	512,455		1.79	%	$	638,423		1.96	%	$	1,327,442		1.81	%

	December 31, 2019																									December 31, 2020
	Due in one year or less					Due after one year through five years					Due after five years through 10 years					Due after 10 years					Total					Due in one year or less					Due after one year through five years					Due after five years through ten years					Due after ten years					Total
	Carrying Value		Yield			Carrying Value		Yield			Carrying Value		Yield			Carrying Value		Yield			Carrying Value		Yield			Carrying Value		Yield			Carrying Value		Yield			Carrying Value		Yield			Carrying Value		Yield			Carrying Value		Yield
	(Dollars in thousands)																									(Dollars in thousands)
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. government-sponsored entities																										$	—		—	%	$	1,023		2.78	%	$	—		—	%	$	—		—	%	$	1,023		2.78	%
U.S. treasury securities																											4,025		0.14	%		—		—	%		—		—	%		—		—	%	$	4,025		0.14	%
Mortgage-backed securities
Government-sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities	$	—		—	%	$	4		3.50	%	$	39		2.50	%	$	142,024		2.56	%	$	142,067		2.56	%		5		5.77	%		2,093		3.26	%		101,352		2.12	%		547,975		2.10	%	$	651,425		2.10	%
Total available-for-sale securities		—		—	%		4		3.50	%		39		2.50	%		142,024		2.56	%		142,067		2.56	%
Held-to-maturity securities:
U.S. government-sponsored entities		999		1.65	%		992		2.78	%		—		—	%		—		—	%		1,991		2.21	%
Mortgage-backed securities
Government-sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities		—		—	%		2,826		2.81	%		71,317		2.96	%		519,093		2.81	%		593,236		2.83	%
Private label residential mortgage-backed securities																											—		—	%		—		—	%		—		—	%		44,178		0.23	%	$	44,178		0.23	%
Corporate		—		—	%		5,095		2.74	%		17,897		4.94	%		—		—	%		22,992		4.45	%		5,050		2.17	%		—		—	%		48,600		4.25	%		—		—	%	$	53,650		4.05	%
Small Business Administration loan pools		—		—	%		—		—	%		—		—	%		1,478		2.73	%		1,478		2.73	%		—		—	%		—		—	%		—		—	%		1,270		2.38	%	$	1,270		2.38	%
State and political subdivisions⁽¹⁾		16,421		0.83	%		29,082		2.78	%		33,320		2.91	%		70,539		3.15	%		149,362		2.77	%
Total held-to-maturity securities		17,420		0.88	%		37,995		2.77	%		122,534		3.24	%		591,110		2.85	%		769,059		2.87	%
State and political subdivisions⁽¹⁾																											3,765		2.41	%		26,679		2.45	%		24,212		2.93	%		61,600		3.17	%	$	116,256		2.93	%
Total available-for-sale securities																											12,845		1.61	%		29,795		2.52	%		174,164		2.83	%		655,023		2.07	%		871,827		2.23	%
Total debt securities	$	17,420		0.88	%	$	37,999		2.77	%	$	122,573		3.24	%	$	733,134		2.80	%	$	911,126		2.82	%	$	12,845		1.61	%	$	29,795		2.52	%	$	174,164		2.83	%	$	655,023		2.07	%	$	871,827		2.23	%

Mortgage-backed securities are securities that have been developed by pooling a number of real estate mortgages and which are principally issued by federal agencies such as Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and non-agency private label providers. Unlike U.S. Treasury and U.S. ~~government~~Government agency securities, which have a lump sum payment at maturity, mortgage-backed securities provide cash flows from regular principal and interest payments and principal prepayments throughout the lives of the securities. Premiums and discounts on mortgage-backed securities are amortized and accreted over the expected life of the security and may be impacted by prepayments. As such, mortgage-backed securities purchased at a premium will generally produce decreasing net yields as interest rates drop because homeowners tend to refinance their mortgages resulting in prepayments and an acceleration of premium amortization. Securities purchased at a discount will reflect higher net yields in a decreasing interest rate environment as prepayments result in an acceleration of discount accretion.

The contractual maturity of mortgage-backed securities is not a reliable indicator of their expected lives because borrowers have the right to prepay their obligations at any time. Monthly pay downs on mortgage-backed securities cause the average lives of these securities to be much different than their stated lives. At December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, and December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, 66.3% and 85.1% ~~and 89.9%~~ of the mortgage-backed securities held by us had contractual final maturities of more than ten years with a weighted average life of ~~2.5~~4.4 years and ~~4.2~~2.5 years and a modified duration of ~~2.4~~4.1 years and ~~3.8~~2.4 years.

Our lending and investing activities are primarily funded by deposits. A variety of deposit accounts are offered with a wide range of interest rates and terms including demand, savings, money market and time deposits. We rely primarily on competitive pricing policies, convenient locations, comprehensive marketing strategy and personalized service to attract and retain these deposits.

The following table shows our composition of deposits at December 31, 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018.~~2019.

	December 31,																											December 31,
	2020					2019					2018					2020 vs. 2019						2019 vs. 2018						2021					2020					2019					2021 vs. 2020					2020 vs. 2019
	Amount		Percent of Total			Amount		Percent of Total			Amount		Percent of Total			Change			%			Change			%			Amount		Percent of Total			Amount		Percent of Total			Amount		Percent of Total			Change		%			Change			%
	(Dollars in thousands)																											(Dollars in thousands)
Non-interest-bearing demand	$	791,639		22.9	%	$	481,298		15.7	%	$	503,831		16.1	%	$	310,341			64.5	%	$	(22,533	)		(4.5	)%	$	1,244,117		28.1	%	$	791,639		22.9	%	$	481,298		15.7	%	$	452,478		57.2	%	$	310,341			64.5	%
Interest-bearing demand and NOW accounts		1,016,424		29.5	%		703,048		23.0	%		671,320		21.5	%		313,376			44.6	%		31,728			4.7	%		1,202,408		27.2	%		1,016,424		29.5	%		703,048		23.0	%		185,984		18.3	%		313,376			44.6	%
Savings and money market		1,012,673		29.4	%		1,046,000		34.1	%		940,390		30.1	%		(33,327	)		(3.2	)%		105,610			11.2	%		1,319,881		29.9	%		1,012,673		29.4	%		1,046,000		34.1	%		307,208		30.3	%		(33,327	)		(3.2	)%
Time		626,854		18.2	%		833,170		27.2	%		1,007,906		32.3	%		(206,316	)		(24.8	)%		(174,736	)		(17.3	)%		653,598		14.8	%		626,854		18.2	%		833,170		27.2	%		26,744		4.3	%		(206,316	)		(24.8	)%
Total deposits	$	3,447,590		100.0	%	$	3,063,516		100.0	%	$	3,123,447		100.0	%	$	384,074			12.5	%	$	(59,931	)		(1.9	)%	$	4,420,004		100.0	%	$	3,447,590		100.0	%	$	3,063,516		100.0	%	$	972,414		28.2	%	$	384,074			12.5	%

The following tables show deposits assumed in 2021 acquisitions, as of the time of such acquisitions.

The following table shows deposits assumed in 2020 acquisitions, as of the time of such acquisitions.

The following table shows ~~deposits assumed in 2019 acquisitions, as of the time of such acquisitions.~~

~~The following table shows~~ the average deposit balance and average rate paid on deposits for the year ended December 31, 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018.~~2019.

	December 31,															December 31,
	2020					2019					2018					2021					2020					2019
	Average Balance		Average Rate Paid			Average Balance		Average Rate Paid			Average Balance		Average Rate Paid			Average Balance		Average Rate Paid			Average Balance		Average Rate Paid			Average Balance		Average Rate Paid
	(Dollars in thousands)															(Dollars in thousands)
Non-interest-bearing demand	$	678,713		—	%	$	478,638		—	%	$	426,409		—	%	$	1,021,261		—	%	$	678,713		—	%	$	478,638		—	%
Interest-bearing demand and NOW accounts		805,651		0.39	%		683,180		1.19	%		602,506		0.86	%		1,032,938		0.21	%		805,651		0.39	%		683,180		1.19	%
Savings and money market		989,457		0.28	%		1,016,772		1.27	%		798,820		0.94	%		1,129,869		0.14	%		989,457		0.28	%		1,016,772		1.27	%
Time		704,921		1.52	%		967,803		2.06	%		836,298		1.56	%		625,562		0.73	%		704,921		1.52	%		967,803		2.06	%
Total deposits	$	3,178,742				$	3,146,393				$	2,664,033				$	3,809,630				$	3,178,742				$	3,146,393

Included in interest-bearing demand deposits are Insured Cash Sweep (“ICS”) ~~services~~ reciprocal demand deposit balances of $308.4 million at December 31, 2021, $256.0 million at December 31, 2020, and $43.8 million at December 31, ~~2019, and $33.3 million at December 31, 2018.~~2019. Also included in savings and money market deposits at December 31, 2021, 2020, ~~2019~~ and ~~2018~~2019, are ICS ~~services~~ reciprocal money-market ~~deposits~~deposit balances of $52.2 million, $23.7 million, ~~$20.0 million,~~ and ~~$21.0~~$20.0 million. These balances represent customer funds placed in ~~the~~ ICS ~~service~~ that ~~allows~~allow Equity Bank to break large demand and money-market deposits into smaller amounts and place them in a network of other ICS banks to ensure FDIC insurance coverage on the entire deposit. These deposits are placed ~~through~~in ICS, ~~services,~~ but are Equity Bank’s customer relationships that management views as core funding.

Included in time deposits are Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (“CDARS”) program balances of $3.0 million, $14.9 million, ~~$9.5 million,~~ and ~~$131.1~~$9.5 million at December 31, 2021, 2020, ~~2019,~~ and ~~2018.~~2019. CDARS allows Equity Bank to break large deposits into smaller amounts and place them in a network of other CDARS banks to ensure FDIC insurance coverage on the entire deposit. Reciprocal deposits are not considered brokered deposits as long as the aggregate balance is less than the lessor of 20% of total liabilities or $5.0 billion and Equity Bank is well capitalized and well rated. All non-reciprocal deposits and reciprocal deposits in excess of regulatory limits are considered brokered deposits.

The following table provides information on the maturity distribution of time deposits of ~~$100,000~~$250,000 or more as of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, and December 31, ~~2019.~~2020.

	December 31,				December 31,
	2020		2019		2021		2020
	(Dollars in thousands)				(Dollars in thousands)
3 months or less	$	93,025	$	132,148	$	88,969	$	49,240
Over 3 through 6 months		70,737		110,714		115,063		35,646
Over 6 through 12 months		120,006		163,802		14,047		41,603
Over 12 months		100,877		133,337		15,381		44,067
Total Time Deposits	$	384,645	$	540,001	$	233,460	$	170,556

We utilize borrowings to supplement deposits to fund our lending and investing activities. Short-term borrowing and long-term borrowing consist of funds from the FHLB, federal funds purchased and retail repurchase agreements, a bank stock loan and ~~subordinated debentures.~~

subordinated debt. The ~~following table presents our~~Company continually has short-term borrowings ~~at the dates indicated.~~which are disclosed in “NOTE 11 – BORROWINGS” and “NOTE 12 – SUBORDINATED DEBT.”

Federal funds purchased and retail repurchase agreements: We have available federal funds lines of credit with our correspondent banks. Retail repurchase agreements outstanding represent the purchase of interests in securities by banking customers. Retail repurchase agreements are stated at the amount of cash received in connection with the transaction. We do not account for any of our retail repurchase agreements as sales for accounting purposes in our financial statements. ~~Repurchase~~Retail repurchase agreements with banking customers are settled on the following business day. See “NOTE 11 – BORROWINGS” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

FHLB advances: FHLB advances include both draws against our line of credit and fixed rate term advances. Each term advance is payable in full at its maturity date and contains provision for prepayment penalties. The Company acquired ~~$17.4~~$14.4 million in FHLB term advances in the ~~August 2018 City Bank merger.~~October 2021 ASBI merger, all of which have subsequently been repaid. Our FHLB borrowings are used for operational liquidity needs for originating and purchasing loans, purchasing investments and general operating cash requirements. See “NOTE 11 – BORROWINGS” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Bank stock loan: The Company maintains a borrowing facility through an unaffiliated financial institution. The terms of the loan require us and Equity Bank to maintain minimum capital ratios and other covenants. The loan and accrued interest may be pre-paid at any time without penalty. In the event of default, the lender has the option to declare all outstanding balances as immediately due. For detailed information, see “NOTE 11 – BORROWINGS” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Subordinated debentures: In conjunction with the 2012 acquisition of First Community, we assumed certain subordinated debentures owed to special purpose unconsolidated subsidiaries that are controlled by us, FCB Capital Trust II and FCB Capital Trust III, (“CTII” and “CTIII,” respectively). In conjunction with the 2016 acquisition of Community First Bancshares, Inc., we assumed certain subordinated debentures owed to a special purpose unconsolidated subsidiary that is controlled by us, Community First (AR) Statutory Trust I, (“CFSTI”). In conjunction with the 2021 acquisition of ASBI, we assumed certain subordinated debentures owed to a special purpose unconsolidated subsidiary that is controlled by us, American State Bank Statutory Trust I, (“ASBSTI”). For additional information, see “NOTE 12 – SUBORDINATED DEBT” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Subordinated notes: In 2020, the Company entered into Subordinated Note Purchase Agreements with certain qualified institutional buyers and institutional accredited investors pursuant to which the Company issued and sold a total of $75.0 million in aggregate principal amounts of its 7.00% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due in 2030. For additional information, see “NOTE 12 – SUBORDINATED DEBT” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Market and public confidence in our financial strength and financial institutions, in general, will largely determine access to appropriate levels of liquidity. This confidence is significantly dependent on our ability to maintain sound asset quality and appropriate levels of capital reserves.

Liquidity is defined as the ability to meet anticipated customer demands for future funds under credit commitments and deposit withdrawals at a reasonable cost and on a timely basis. We measure our liquidity position by giving consideration to both on- and off-balance sheet sources of and demands for funds on a daily, weekly and monthly basis.

Liquidity risk involves the risk of being unable to fund assets with the appropriate duration and rate-based liabilities, as well as the risk of not being able to meet unexpected cash needs. Liquidity planning and management are necessary to ensure the ability to fund operations in a cost-effective manner and to meet current and future potential obligations such as loan commitments, lease obligations and unexpected deposit outflows. In this process, we focus on both assets and liabilities and on the manner in which they combine to provide adequate liquidity to meet our needs.

During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018,~~2019, our liquidity needs have primarily been met by core deposits, security and loan maturities and amortizing investment and loan portfolios. Other funding sources include federal funds purchased, retail repurchase agreements, brokered certificates of deposit, subordinated notes and borrowings from the FHLB.

Our largest sources of funds are ~~FHLB borrowings~~deposits, fed funds sold, retail repurchase agreements, and ~~deposits~~subordinated debt, and our largest uses of funds are the origination or purchases of loans and securities purchases. Average loans were $2.88 billion for the year ended December 31, 2021, an increase of 6.9% over average loans of $2.70 billion for the year ended December 31, ~~2020, an increase of 3.4% over average loans of $2.61 billion for the year ended December 31, 2019.~~2020. Excess deposits are primarily invested in our interest-bearing deposit account with the Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank, investment securities, federal funds sold or other short-term liquid investments until the funds are needed to fund loan growth. Our securities portfolio has a weighted average life of ~~3.0~~4.8 years and a modified duration of ~~2.8~~4.5 years at December 31, ~~2020.~~2021. We believe that our daily funding needs can be met through cash provided by operating activities, payments and maturities on loans and investment securities, our core deposit base, FHLB advances and other borrowing relationships. On March 13, 2017, the Company entered into an agreement with an unaffiliated financial institution that provided for a maximum borrowing facility of $30.0 million, which was subsequently amended on March 11, 2019, to increase the maximum borrowing facility to $40.0 million. This agreement was renewed and amended on February 11, 2022, to decrease the maximum borrowing amount from $40.0 million to $25.0 million. This agreement, which is secured by Equity Bank stock, can be used to fund future acquisitions and for general corporate purposes. There was no outstanding balance on this borrowing facility for the period ending December 31, ~~2020.~~2021.

During 2021, operating and financing activities provided $102.7 million and $191.9 million of liquidity, respectively, which was partially offset by investing activities use of $315.3 million of cash assets, ultimately decreasing total cash and cash equivalents by $20.7 million. The cash usage in investing activities was driven mostly by purchases of securities of $785.3 million, partially offset by proceeds from securities of $472.9 million. The cash provided by financing activities was primarily due to increases in deposits of $228.5 million, offset by net payments on FHLB advances of $24.5 million and purchases of treasury stock of $18.7 million.

During 2020, operating activities provided $43.6 million of liquidity, investing activities infused $96.0 million of cash assets and financing activities generated $51.8 million of additional funds, ultimately increasing total cash and cash equivalents by $191.4 million. The cash provided by investing activities came primarily from $66.9 million of net proceeds from securities transactions and $25.9 million of net cash received from the Almena acquisition. The cash provided by financing activities was principally due to a $321.5 million increase in deposits and $75.0 million from subordinated ~~notes~~note originations, partially offset by a $314.2 million reduction in FHLB borrowings, treasury stock purchases of $19.3 million and a $9.0 million net payoff of the bank stock loan.

During 2019, $48.5 million of liquidity was provided by operating activities and $96.1 million of net cash via investing activities was offset by $248.1 million of net cash used in financing activities, resulting in a $103.5 million reduction in cash and cash equivalents. The cash provided by investing activities came principally from $85.4 million of net cash received from the MidFirst acquisition plus an $8.5 million net reduction in loan balances. The cash usage in financing activities was driven mostly by a $158.7 million decrease in deposits, a $60.5 million paydown in FHLB advances, a $14.4 million reduction in federal funds purchased and retail repurchase agreements, $10.9 million for treasury stock purchases, premises and equipment acquisitions for $6.9 million and $6.5 million in net principal payments on the bank stock loan.

For information related to cash flow during ~~2018,~~2019, see “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 10, 2020.

In the normal course of business, we enter into various transactions, which, in accordance with GAAP, are not included in our consolidated balance sheets. We enter into these transactions to meet the financing needs of our customers. These transactions include commitments to extend credit and standby and commercial letters of credit, which involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. Our exposure to credit loss is

represented by the contractual amounts of these commitments. The same credit policies and procedures are used in making these commitments as for on-balance sheet instruments.

Our commitments associated with outstanding standby and performance letters of credit and commitments to extend credit expiring by period as of December 31, 2020, are summarized below. Since commitments associated with letters of credit and commitments to extend credit may expire unused, the amounts shown do not necessarily reflect the actual future cash funding requirements.

Standby and Performance Letters of Credit: For additional information see “NOTE 22 – COMMITMENTS AND CREDIT RISK” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Commitments to Extend Credit: For additional information see “NOTE 22 – COMMITMENTS AND CREDIT RISK” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~The following table summarizes our contractual~~In the normal course of business, we enter into short-term and long-term debt obligations ~~and other~~resulting in commitments to make future payments as of December 31, 2020 (other than securities sold under repurchase agreements). These obligations consist of our future cash payments associated with contractual obligations pursuant to FHLB advances, time deposit contracts, borrowed funds,payments. For additional information see “NOTE 11 – BORROWINGS” and ~~non-cancelable future operating leases. Payments related to leases are based on actual payments specified in underlying contracts.~~“NOTE 12 – SUBORDINATED DEBT.”

Other contractual obligations represent commitments made by us to make capital investments in limited-liability entities that invest in qualified affordable housing projects. Payments on these obligations are made as requested by the managers of the limited-liability entities, however the table below includes an estimate of the anticipated timing of payments pursuant to these commitments.

Capital management consists of providing equity to support our current and future operations. The bank regulators view capital levels as important indicators of an institution’s financial soundness. As a general matter, FDIC-insured depository institutions and their holding companies are required to maintain minimum capital relative to the amount and types of assets they hold. As a bank holding company and a ~~state-chartered-Fed-member~~state chartered Fed member bank, the Company and Equity Bank are subject to regulatory capital requirements.

Capital adequacy guidelines and prompt corrective action regulations involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators. Failure to meet capital requirements can initiate regulatory action. Management believes, as of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, and December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the Company and Equity Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

Prompt corrective action regulations provide five classifications: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept brokered deposits. If undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as are asset growth and acquisitions, and capital restoration plans are required.

Failure to meet capital guidelines could subject the institution to a variety of enforcement remedies by federal bank regulatory agencies, including termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC, restrictions on certain business activities and appointment of the FDIC as conservator or receiver. As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the most recent notifications from the federal regulatory agencies categorized Equity Bank as “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, Equity Bank must maintain minimum total capital, Tier 1 capital, Common Equity Tier 1 capital and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed Equity Bank’s category.

The ~~decrease~~total increase in stockholders’ equity of $93.0 million was principally attributable to the ASBI merger, which increased capital by $84.7 million, and total comprehensive income of $34.5 million, partially offset by a ~~loss~~retained earnings adjustment related to ASC 326 implementation of ~~$75.0~~$12.4 million ~~for the year ended December 31, 2020,~~ and treasury stock purchases of $19.3 million, partially offset by change in other comprehensive gain of $19.8 million, stock based compensation of $3.5 million, common stock issued under employee stock purchase plan of $596 thousand, employee stock loan payments of $34 thousand and common stock issued upon exercise of stock options of $20 thousand.$18.7 million. For additional information about the Company’s capital see “NOTE 16 – REGULATORY MATTERS” in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

We identify certain financial measures discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as being “non-GAAP financial measures.” In accordance with the SEC’s rules, we classify a financial measure as being a non-GAAP financial measure if that financial measure excludes or includes amounts, or is subject to adjustments that have the effect of excluding or including amounts, that are included or excluded, as the case may be, in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as in effect from time to time in the United States in our statements of income, balance sheets or statements of cash flows. Non-GAAP financial measures do not include operating and other statistical measures or ratios or statistical measures calculated using exclusively either financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP, operating measures or other measures that are not non-GAAP financial measures or both.

The non-GAAP financial measures that we discuss in this Annual Report on Form 10-K should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the most directly comparable or other financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. Moreover, the manner in which we calculate the non-GAAP financial measures that we discuss in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may differ from that of other companies reporting measures with similar names. You should understand how such other banking organizations calculate their financial measures similar or with names similar to the non-GAAP financial measures we have discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K when comparing such non-GAAP financial measures.

Tangible Book Value per Common Share and Tangible Book Value Per Diluted Common Share: Tangible book value is a non-GAAP measure generally used by financial analysts and investment bankers to evaluate financial institutions. We calculate: (a) tangible common equity as total stockholders’ equity less preferred stock, goodwill, core deposit intangibles, net of accumulated amortization, mortgage servicing asset, net of accumulated amortization, and naming rights, net of accumulated amortization; (b) tangible book value per common share as tangible common equity (as described in clause (a)) divided by shares of common stock outstanding; and (c) tangible book value per diluted common share as tangible common equity (as described in clause (a)) divided by shares of common stock outstanding plus the period-end dilutive effects of vested restricted stock units, ~~and~~ the assumed exercise of stock options, ~~and~~ redemption of non-vested restricted stock ~~units.~~units, and pending employee stock purchase plan shares at period end. For tangible book value, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP is book value.

Management believes that these measures are important to many investors who are interested in changes from period to period in book value per common share exclusive of changes in intangible assets. Goodwill and other intangible assets have the effect of increasing total book value while not increasing our tangible book value.

The following table reconciles, as of the dates set forth below, total stockholders’ equity to tangible common equity, tangible book value per common share and ~~diluted~~ tangible book value per diluted common share and compares these values with book value per common share.

	December 31,										December 31,
	2020		2019		2018		2017		2016		2021		2020		2019		2018		2017
	(Dollars in thousands, except share data)										(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
Total stockholders’ equity	$	407,649	$	478,060	$	455,941	$	374,144	$	257,964	$	500,631	$	407,649	$	478,060	$	455,941	$	374,144
Less: goodwill		31,601		136,432		131,712		104,907		58,874		54,465		31,601		136,432		131,712		104,907
Less: core deposit intangibles, net		16,057		19,907		21,725		10,738		4,715		14,879		16,057		19,907		21,725		10,738
Less: mortgage servicing asset, net		—		5		11		17		23		276		—		5		11		17
Less: naming rights, net		1,130		1,174		1,217		1,260	—			1,087		1,130		1,174		1,217		1,260
Tangible common equity	$	358,861	$	320,542	$	301,276	$	257,222	$	194,352	$	429,924	$	358,861	$	320,542	$	301,276	$	257,222
Common shares outstanding at period end		14,540,556		15,444,434		15,793,095		14,605,607		11,680,308		16,760,115		14,540,556		15,444,434		15,793,095		14,605,607
Diluted common shares outstanding at period end		14,540,556		15,719,810		16,085,729		14,873,257		11,873,480		17,050,115		14,540,556		15,719,810		16,085,729		14,873,257
Book value per common share	$	28.04	$	30.95	$	28.87	$	25.62	$	22.09	$	29.87	$	28.04	$	30.95	$	28.87	$	25.62
Tangible book value per common share	$	24.68	$	20.75	$	19.08	$	17.61	$	16.64	$	25.65	$	24.68	$	20.75	$	19.08	$	17.61
Tangible book value per diluted common share	$	24.68	$	20.39	$	18.73	$	17.29	$	16.37	$	25.22	$	24.68	$	20.39	$	18.73	$	17.29

Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets: Tangible common equity to tangible assets is a non-GAAP measure generally used by financial analysts and investment bankers to evaluate financial institutions. We calculate: (a) tangible common equity as total stockholders’ equity less preferred stock, goodwill, core deposit intangibles, net of accumulated amortization, mortgage servicing asset, net of accumulated amortization and naming rights, net of accumulated amortization; (b) tangible assets as total assets less goodwill, core deposit intangibles, net of accumulated amortization, mortgage servicing asset, net of accumulated amortization and naming rights, net of accumulated amortization; and (c) tangible common equity to tangible assets as tangible common equity (as described in clause (a)) divided by tangible assets (as described in clause (b)). For common equity to tangible assets, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP is total stockholders’ equity to total assets.

Management believes that this measure is important to many investors in the marketplace who are interested in the relative changes from period to period in common equity and total assets, each exclusive of changes in intangible assets. Goodwill and other intangible assets have the effect of increasing both total stockholders’ equity and total assets while not increasing tangible common equity or tangible assets.

The following table reconciles, as of the dates set forth below, total stockholders’ equity to tangible common equity and total assets to tangible assets.

	December 31,															December 31,
	2020			2019			2018			2017			2016			2021			2020			2019			2018			2017
	(Dollars in thousands)															(Dollars in thousands)
Total stockholders’ equity	$	407,649		$	478,060		$	455,941		$	374,144		$	257,964		$	500,631		$	407,649		$	478,060		$	455,941		$	374,144
Less: goodwill		31,601			136,432			131,712			104,907			58,874			54,465			31,601			136,432			131,712			104,907
Less: core deposit intangibles, net		16,057			19,907			21,725			10,738			4,715			14,879			16,057			19,907			21,725			10,738
Less: mortgage servicing asset, net		—			5			11			17			23			276			—			5			11			17
Less: naming rights, net		1,130			1,174			1,217			1,260		—				1,087			1,130			1,174			1,217			1,260
Tangible common equity	$	358,861		$	320,542		$	301,276		$	257,222		$	194,352		$	429,924		$	358,861		$	320,542		$	301,276		$	257,222
Total assets	$	4,013,356		$	3,949,578		$	4,061,716		$	3,170,509		$	2,192,192		$	5,137,631		$	4,013,356		$	3,949,578		$	4,061,716		$	3,170,509
Less: goodwill		31,601			136,432			131,712			104,907			58,874			54,465			31,601			136,432			131,712			104,907
Less: core deposit intangibles, net		16,057			19,907			21,725			10,738			4,715			14,879			16,057			19,907			21,725			10,738
Less: mortgage servicing asset, net		—			5			11			17			23			276			—			5			11			17
Less: naming rights, net		1,130			1,174			1,217			1,260			—			1,087			1,130			1,174			1,217			1,260
Tangible assets	$	3,964,568		$	3,792,060		$	3,907,051		$	3,053,587		$	2,128,580		$	5,066,924		$	3,964,568		$	3,792,060		$	3,907,051		$	3,053,587
Equity / assets		10.16	%		12.10	%		11.23	%		11.80	%		11.77	%		9.74	%		10.16	%		12.10	%		11.23	%		11.80	%
Tangible common equity to tangible assets		9.05	%		8.45	%		7.71	%		8.42	%		9.13	%		8.48	%		9.05	%		8.45	%		7.71	%		8.42	%

Return on Average Tangible Common Equity: Return on average tangible common equity is a non-GAAP measure generally used by financial analysts and investment bankers to evaluate financial institutions. We calculate: (a) average tangible common equity as total average stockholders’ equity less average intangible assets and preferred stock; (b) adjusted net income allocable to common stockholders as net income allocable to common stockholders plus goodwill impairment, net of actual tax effect, plus amortization of intangible assets less estimated tax effect on amortization of intangible assets (tax rates used in this calculation were 21% for 2021, 2020, 2019 and 2018; 35% for ~~2017 and 2016)~~2017) (c) return on average tangible common equity as adjusted net income allocable to common stockholders (as described in clause (b)) divided by average tangible common equity (as described in clause (a)). For return on average tangible common equity, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP is return on average equity.

Management believes that this measure is important to many investors in the marketplace because it measures the return on equity, exclusive of the effects of intangible assets on earnings and capital. Goodwill and other intangible assets have the effect of increasing average stockholders’ equity and, through amortization, decreasing net income allocable to common stockholders while not increasing average tangible common equity or decreasing adjusted net income allocable to common stockholders.

The following table reconciles, as of the dates set forth below, total average stockholders’ equity to average tangible common equity and net income allocable to common stockholders to adjusted net income allocable to common stockholders.

	December 31,															December 31,
	2020			2019			2018			2017			2016			2021			2020			2019			2018			2017
	(Dollars in thousands)															(Dollars in thousands)
Total average stockholders’ equity	$	464,608		$	463,445		$	420,453		$	293,798		$	168,823		$	446,795		$	464,608		$	463,445		$	420,453		$	293,798
Less: average intangible assets		130,329			158,410			139,131			76,320			25,883			50,831			130,329			158,410			139,131			76,320
Average tangible common equity	$	334,279		$	305,035		$	281,322		$	217,478		$	142,940		$	395,964		$	334,279		$	305,035		$	281,322		$	217,478
Net income (loss) allocable to common stockholders	$	(74,970	)	$	25,579		$	35,825		$	20,649		$	9,373		$	52,480		$	(74,970	)	$	25,579		$	35,825		$	20,649
Plus: goodwill impairment, net of actual tax effect		99,526			—			—			—			—			—			99,526			—			—			—
Amortization of intangible assets		3,898			3,218			2,492			1,070			419			4,242			3,898			3,218			2,492			1,070
Less: estimated tax effect on intangible asset amortization		819			676			523			375			147			891			819			676			523			375
Adjusted net income allocable to common stockholders	$	27,635		$	28,121		$	37,794		$	21,344		$	9,645		$	55,831		$	27,635		$	28,121		$	37,794		$	21,344
Return on average equity (ROAE)		(16.14	)%		5.52	%		8.52	%		7.03	%		5.55	%		11.75	%		(16.14	)%		5.52	%		8.52	%		7.03	%
Return on average tangible common equity (ROATCE)		8.27	%		9.22	%		13.43	%		9.81	%		6.75	%		14.10	%		8.27	%		9.22	%		13.43	%		9.81	%

Efficiency Ratio: The efficiency ratio is a non-GAAP measure generally used by financial analysts and investment bankers to evaluate financial institutions. We calculate the efficiency ratio by dividing non-interest expense, excluding goodwill impairment, merger expenses and loss on debt extinguishment, by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income, excluding net gains on the sale of available-for-sale securities and other securities transactions, and the net gain on acquisition. The GAAP-based efficiency ratio is non-interest expenses divided by net interest income plus non-interest income.

In management’s judgment, the adjustments made to non-interest expense and non-interest income allow investors and analysts to better assess operating expenses in relation to operating revenue by removing merger expenses, loss on debt extinguishment, net gains on the sale of available-for-sale securities and other securities transactions, and the net gain on acquisition.

The following table reconciles, as of the dates set forth below, the efficiency ratio to the GAAP-based efficiency ratio.

	December 31,															December 31,
	2020			2019			2018			2017			2016			2021			2020			2019			2018			2017
	(Dollars in thousands)															(Dollars in thousands)
Non-interest expense	$	208,990		$	99,635		$	94,387		$	67,463		$	47,075		$	119,465		$	208,990		$	99,635		$	94,387		$	67,463
Less: goodwill impairment		104,831			—			—			—			—			—			104,831			—			—			—
Less: merger expenses		299			915			7,462			5,352			5,294			9,189			299			915			7,462			5,352
Less: loss on debt extinguishment		—			—			—			—			58			372			—			—			—			—
Non-interest expense, excluding merger expenses and loss on debt extinguishment	$	103,860		$	98,720		$	86,925		$	62,111		$	41,723		$	109,904		$	103,860		$	98,720		$	86,925		$	62,111
Net interest income	$	132,652		$	125,858		$	124,798		$	86,002		$	52,597		$	142,579		$	132,652		$	125,858		$	124,798		$	86,002
Non-interest income	$	26,023		$	24,988		$	19,725		$	15,440		$	10,466		$	32,842		$	26,023		$	24,988		$	19,725		$	15,440
Less: gain on acquisition		2,145			—			—			—			—			585			2,145			—			—			—
Less: net gains (losses) from securities transactions		11			14			(9	)		271			479			406			11			14			(9	)		271
Non-interest income, excluding net gains (losses) from security transactions and gain on acquisition	$	23,867		$	24,974		$	19,734		$	15,169		$	9,987		$	31,851		$	23,867		$	24,974		$	19,734		$	15,169
Non-interest expense, less goodwill impairment, to net interest income plus non-interest income		65.64	%		66.05	%		65.31	%		66.50	%		74.65	%		68.10	%		65.64	%		66.05	%		65.31	%		66.50	%
Efficiency Ratio		66.36	%		65.45	%		60.14	%		61.39	%		66.67	%		63.01	%		66.36	%		65.45	%		60.14	%		61.39	%

Our ~~asset-liability~~asset liability policy provides guidelines to management for effective funds management, and management has established a measurement system for monitoring net interest rate sensitivity position within established guidelines.

As a financial institution, the primary component of market risk is interest rate volatility. Fluctuations in interest rates will ultimately impact both the level of income and expense recorded on most assets and liabilities, and the market value of all interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, other than those which have a short term to maturity. Interest rate risk is the potential of economic gains or losses due to future interest rate changes. These changes can be reflected in future net interest income and/or fair market values. The objective is to measure the effect on net interest income (“NII”) and economic value of equity (“EVE”) and to adjust the balance sheet to minimize the inherent risk, while at the same time maximizing income.

We manage exposure to interest rates by structuring the balance sheet in the ordinary course of business. We have the ability to enter into instruments such as leveraged derivatives, interest rate swaps, financial options, financial future contracts or forward delivery contracts for the purpose of reducing interest rate risk; however, currently, we do not have a material exposure to these instruments. We also have the ability to enter into interest rate swaps as an accommodation to our customers in connection with an interest rate swap program. Based upon the nature of its operations, we are not subject to foreign exchange or commodity price risk. We do not own any trading assets.

Our exposure to interest rate risk is managed by the Asset Liability Committee (“ALCO”), which is composed of certain members of senior management, in accordance with policies approved by the Board of Directors. The ALCO formulates strategies based on appropriate levels of interest rate risk. In determining the appropriate level of interest rate risk, the ALCO considers the impact on earnings and capital of the current outlook on interest rates, potential changes in interest rates, regional economies, liquidity, business strategies and other factors. The ALCO meets monthly to review, among other things, the sensitivity of assets and liabilities to interest rate changes, the book and market values of assets and liabilities, unrealized gains and losses, securities purchase and sale activities, commitments to originate loans and the maturities of investment securities and borrowings. Additionally, the ALCO reviews liquidity, projected cash flows, maturities of deposits and consumer and commercial deposit activity.

ALCO uses a simulation analysis to monitor and manage the pricing and maturity of assets and liabilities in order to diminish the potential adverse impact that changes in interest rates could have on net interest income. The simulation tests the sensitivity of NII and EVE. Contractual maturities and repricing opportunities of loans are incorporated in the simulation model as are prepayment assumptions, maturity data and call options within the investment securities portfolio. Assumptions based on past experience are incorporated into the model for non-maturity deposit accounts. The assumptions used are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot precisely measure the future NII and EVE. Actual results will differ from the model’s simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and the application and timing of various management strategies.

The change in the impact of net interest income from the base case for December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019~~2020 was primarily driven by the rate and mix of variable and fixed rate financial instruments, the underlying duration of the financial instruments, and the level of response to changes in the interest rate environment. The increase in the level of negative impact to net interest income in the up interest rate shock scenarios ~~are~~is due to the assumed migration of non-term deposit liabilities to higher rate term deposits; the level of fixed rate investments and loans receivable that will not reprice to higher rates; ~~the variable rate Federal Home Loan Bank advances;~~ the variable rate subordinated debentures, and the non-term deposits that are assumed not to migrate to term deposits that are variable rate and will reprice to the higher rates; and a portion of our portfolio of variable rate loans contain restrictions on the amount of repricing and frequency of repricing that limit the amount of repricing to the current higher rates. These factors result in the negative impacts to net interest income in the ~~up-interest~~up interest rate shock scenarios that are detailed in the table below. In the down interest rate shock scenario, the main drivers of the negative impact on net interest income are the decrease in investment income due to the negative convexity features of the fixed rate ~~mortgage backed~~mortgage-backed securities; assumed prepayment of existing fixed rate loans receivable; the downward pricing of variable rate loans receivable; the constraint of the shock on non-term deposits; and the level of term deposit repricing. Our ~~mortgage back~~mortgage-backed security portfolio is primarily comprised of fixed rate investments and as rates decrease, the level of prepayments will increase and cause the current higher rate investments to prepay and the assumed reinvestment will be at lower interest rates. Similar to our ~~mortgage backed~~mortgage-backed securities, the model assumes that our fixed rate loans receivable will prepay at a faster rate and reinvestment will occur at lower rates. The level of downward shock on the non-term deposits is constrained to limit the downward shock to a non-zero rate which results in a minimal reduction in the average rate paid. Term deposits repricing will only decrease the average cost paid by a minimal amount due to the assumed repricing occurring at maturity. These factors result in the negative impact to net interest income in the down interest rate shock scenario.

The change in the economic value of equity from the base case for December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019~~2020, is due to us being in a liability sensitive position and the level of convexity in our pre-payable assets. Generally, with a liability sensitive position, as interest rates increase, the value of your assets decrease faster than the value of liabilities and, as interest rates decrease, the value of your assets increase at a faster rate than liabilities. However, due to the level of convexity in our fixed rate pre-payable assets, we do not experience a similar change in the value of assets in a down interest rate shock scenario. In addition, the mix of interest-bearing deposit and non-interest-bearing deposits impact the level of deposit decay and the resulting benefit of discounting from the non-interest-bearing deposits. At December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, non-interest-bearing deposits were approximately ~~$791.6 million,~~$1.24 billion, or ~~64.5%~~57.2%, higher than that deposit type at December 31, ~~2019.~~2020. Substantially all investments and approximately ~~56.0%~~54.0% of loans are pre-payable and fixed rate and as rates decrease the level of modeled prepayments increase. The prepaid principal is assumed to reprice at the assumed current rates, resulting in a smaller positive impact to the economic value of equity.

The following table summarizes the simulated immediate change in net interest income for twelve months as of the dates indicated.

	Impact on Net Interest Income						Impact on Net Interest Income
	December 31,						December 31,
Change in prevailing interest rates	2020			2019			2021			2020
+300 basis points		(1.2	)%		(12.3	)%		(4.4	)%		(1.2	)%
+200 basis points		0.4	%		(7.6	)%		(2.4	)%		0.4	%
+100 basis points		1.0	%		(3.5	)%		(1.0	)%		1.0	%
0 basis points		—			—			—	%		—	%
-100 basis points		(2.3	)%		1.9	%		(4.4	)%		(2.3	)%

	Impact on Economic Value of Equity						Impact on Economic Value of Equity
	December 31,						December 31,
Change in prevailing interest rates	2020			2019			2021			2020
+300 basis points		12.8	%		(7.6	)%		(2.8	)%		12.8	%
+200 basis points		14.4	%		(3.0	)%		0.7	%		14.4	%
+100 basis points		9.2	%		(0.6	)%		2.7	%		9.2	%
0 basis points		—		—				—	%		—	%
-100 basis points		(21.2	)%		(4.4	)%		(14.8	)%		(21.2	)%

Our financial statements and accompanying notes, including the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, are set forth beginning on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In the last three years, The ~~following tables present supplementary~~Company has not had any retroactive change to historical quarterly financial information (unaudited) for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. This information should be read in conjunction with the historical consolidated financial statements of the Company and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

~~(1) For additional information see “Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.~~data.

Item 9: Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, management of the Company, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based upon, and as of the date of that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in ensuring the information relating to the Company (and its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act was recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the last fiscal quarter of the fiscal year for which this Annual Report on Form 10-K is filed that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Report on Management’s Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined under Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act). The Company’s internal control system is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway Commission in 2013. As permitted, the Company has excluded the operations of Almena State Bank acquired at October 23, 2020, which is described in “NOTE 2 – BUSINESS COMBINATIONS” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, from the scope of management’s report on internal control over financial reporting. Based on the assessment, management determined that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2020.~~2021.

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, has been audited by Crowe LLP, Indianapolis, Indiana, (U.S. PCAOB Auditor Firm I.D. 173), the independent registered public accounting firm who also has audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Crowe LLP has issued a

report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, which is included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and is incorporated into this item by reference.

The information required by this item will be contained in our Proxy Statement for the ~~2021~~2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in April ~~2021,~~2022, a copy of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year and is incorporated herein by reference.

Our board of directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other executive officers. The full text of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on the investor relations page of our website which is located at http://investor.equitybank.com. We will post any amendments to our code of business conduct and ethics, or waivers of its requirements, on our website.

Item 12: Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information relating to securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans is included in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under “Item 5 – Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.”

Item 13: Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The financial statements included as part of this Form 10-K are identified in the index to the Audited Financial Statements appearing in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and which index is incorporated in this Item 15 by reference.

All supplemental schedules are omitted as inapplicable or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.

The information required by this Item 15(a)(3) is set forth in the Exhibit Index immediately following. The exhibits listed herein will be furnished upon written request to Equity Bancshares, Inc., 7701 East Kellogg Drive, Suite 300, Wichita, Kansas 67207, Attention: Investor Relations, and payment of a reasonable fee that will be limited to our reasonable expense in furnishing such exhibits.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Each person whose signature appears below appoints Brad S. Elliott, Eric R. Newell and Gregory H. Kossover, and each of them, any of whom may act without the joinder of the other, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or would do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

~~Stockholders~~Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Equity Bancshares, Inc.

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidatedbalance sheets of Equity Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") as of December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, and the related notes ~~(collectively~~(collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by COSO.

As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for credit losses effective January 1, 2021 due to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification No. 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (ASC 326). The Company adopted the new credit loss standard using the modified retrospective method such that prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with previously applicable generally accepted accounting principles. The adoption of ASC 326 is also communicated as a critical audit matter below.

The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Report on Management’s Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk.

As permitted, the Company has excluded the operations of Almena State Bank acquired during 2020, which is described in Note 2 of the financial statements, from the scope of the Report on Management’s Assessment of Internal Control over Financial Reporting. As such, it has also been excluded from the scope of our audit of internal control over financial reporting. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The critical audit ~~matters~~matter communicated below ~~are matters~~is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that ~~were~~was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: ~~(i) relate~~(1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and ~~(ii)~~(2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit ~~matters do~~matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit ~~matters~~matter below, providing a separate ~~opinions~~opinion on the critical audit ~~matters~~matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which ~~they relate.~~ it relates.

As described in Notes 1 and 4 to the financial statements and noted in the Change in Accounting Principle paragraph above, the Company adopted ASC 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses as of January 1, 2021. The current expected credit loss (“CECL”) impairment model requires an estimate of expected credit losses, measured over the contractual life of an instrument, which considers reasonable and supportable forecasts of future economic conditions in addition to information about past events and current conditions. The Company recorded a net reduction to retained earnings of $12.4 million as a cumulative-effect adjustment as a result of the adoption of the standard on January 1, 2021. See change in accounting principle explanatory paragraph above. As of December 31, 2021, the Company’s allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses ~~(“ALL”) is a valuation~~on loans was $48.4 million and the provision for credit losses on loans was ($8.5 million) for the year then ended.

Upon adoption and in continued application of CECL, the Company measures the allowance for ~~probable incurred loan~~credit losses inutilizing a probability of default (“PD”) and loss given default (“LGD”) modeling approach for historical loss. The estimated PD and LGD rates are applied to the ~~loan portfolio~~estimated exposure at ~~each balance sheet date.~~default (“EAD”) to calculate expected credit losses. The ~~ALL was approximately $33.7 million at December 31, 2020 and consisted primarily of 1)~~Company’s CECL model utilizes a ~~specific component of approximately $10.5 million~~statistical regression of loss ~~allocations on loans individually evaluated for impairment and 2) a general component of approximately $23.2 million of loss allocations on loans collectively evaluated for impairment.~~

~~Loss allocations within the general component are based on both historical loss ratios and qualitative loss factors, applied~~experience correlated to ~~each loan portfolio. The qualitative loss factors are used to adjust current conditions to the conditions that existed during the Company’s loss history. The matters considered by the Company~~changes in ~~determining these factors are disclosed in Note 1.~~

~~The determination of these qualitative loss~~economic factors for each loan portfolio can have a significant impact on the estimate of incurred losses recorded within the general component of the ALL. The determination of these qualitative loss factors is an inherently subjective process as it requires a high degree of judgment by management to make assumptions regarding how credit quality factors, adjusted for external economic factors and other pertinent economic data, could impact the level of estimated incurred lossesall commercial banks operating within the Company’s ~~loan portfolios.~~

~~Given~~geographical footprint. The methodologies utilized to develop and implement the ~~significance of qualitative~~macroeconomic factors that drive the loss ~~factors to~~estimates use multivariate regression modeling techniques. The process involved the ~~overall ALL, as well as the level of judgment and subjectivity involved in management’s determination~~selection of the ~~qualitative loss~~macroeconomic factors ~~we have identified auditing~~and the ~~qualitative loss~~evaluation of regression analysis outputs to determine the statistical fit of the macroeconomic factors used to ~~establish~~forecast expected credit losses. The Company also adjusts for changes in qualitative factors not inherently considered in the ~~general component of~~quantitative analyses. Following adoption, significant management judgment was required in evaluating the ~~ALL to be~~qualitative adjustments used in the analysis.

We determined that auditing the allowance for credit losses on loans was a critical audit matter because ~~it required especially~~of the extent of auditor judgment applied and significant audit effort to evaluate the significant subjective ~~auditor judgment.~~and complex judgments made by management throughout the initial adoption and subsequent application processes, including the need to involve our valuation services specialists. The principal considerations resulting in our determination included the following:

The primary audit procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

As described in Note 7 to the financial statements, during the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment of approximately $104.8 million and retained a goodwill balance of approximately $31.6 million at December 31, 2020, which is allocated to the Company’s single reporting unit. Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level or more frequently whenever events or circumstances occur that indicate it is more likely than not that fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Due to the uncertain economic environment and sustained decline in the Company’s stock price, management performed a quantitative assessment of goodwill as of June 30, 2020 and September 30, 2020, concluding goodwill was impaired as of September 30, 2020.

The calculation of the reporting unit’s fair value in determining goodwill impairment involved significant estimates and subjective assumptions which required a high degree of management judgment. This judgment included, but was not limited to, the selection of appropriate discount rates, the identification of relevant market comparables and the development of cash flow projections. The selection and weighting of the various fair value techniques may have resulted in a higher or lower fair value. Judgment was applied in determining the weightings that were most representative of fair value.

We identified the Company’s goodwill impairment assessment to be a critical audit matter. The principal considerations for this determination was the degree of auditor judgment in performing procedures over the key assumptions, which include discounted cash flows, discount rate, prospective financial information, and weighting allocation to valuation methodologies.

~~The primary procedures performed to address this critical audit matter included:~~

~~Utilization of auditor employed specialist~~ ~~to evaluate appropriateness of valuation methodologies, discount rate, control premium, and overall reasonableness of the fair value.~~

	2021			2020			2019
Interest and dividend income
Loans, including fees	$	137,334		$	134,664		$	149,298
Securities, taxable		15,996			15,521			19,339
Securities, nontaxable		2,843			3,682			4,180
Federal funds sold and other		1,195			1,694			2,682
Total interest and dividend income		157,368			155,561			175,499
Interest expense
Deposits		8,255			16,582			40,914
Federal funds purchased and retail repurchase agreements		104			105			155
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		169			2,292			6,667
Federal Reserve Bank discount window		—			6			—
Bank stock loan		—			415			654
Subordinated debt		6,261			3,509			1,251
Total interest expense		14,789			22,909			49,641
Net interest income		142,579			132,652			125,858
Provision (reversal) for credit losses		(8,480	)		24,255			18,354
Net interest income after provision (reversal) for credit losses		151,059			108,397			107,504
Non-interest income
Service charges and fees		8,596			6,856			8,672
Debit card income		10,236			9,136			8,230
Mortgage banking		3,306			3,153			2,468
Increase in value of bank-owned life insurance		3,506			1,941			1,998
Net gain on acquisition		585			2,145			—
Net gain (loss) from securities transactions		406			11			14
Other		6,207			2,781			3,606
Total non-interest income		32,842			26,023			24,988
Non-interest expense
Salaries and employee benefits		54,198			54,129			52,122
Net occupancy and equipment		10,137			8,784			8,674
Data processing		13,261			10,991			10,124
Professional fees		4,713			4,282			4,734
Advertising and business development		3,370			2,498			3,075
Telecommunications		1,966			1,873			2,079
FDIC insurance		1,665			2,088			1,228
Courier and postage		1,429			1,441			1,348
Free nationwide ATM cost		2,019			1,609			1,680
Amortization of core deposit intangibles		4,174			3,850			3,168
Loan expense		934			789			875
Other real estate owned		(188	)		2,310			707
Merger expenses		9,189			299			915
Loss on debt extinguishment		372			—			—
Goodwill impairment		—			104,831			—
Other		12,226			9,216			8,906
Total non-interest expense		119,465			208,990			99,635
Income (loss) before income tax		64,436			(74,570	)		32,857
Provision for income taxes		11,956			400			7,278
Net income (loss) and net income (loss) allocable to common stockholders	$	52,480		$	(74,970	)	$	25,579
Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	3.49		$	(4.97	)	$	1.64
Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	3.43		$	(4.97	)	$	1.61

2020

2019

2018

Interest and dividend income

Loans, including fees

$
134,664

$
149,298

$
137,048

Securities, taxable

15,521

19,339

17,943

Securities, nontaxable

3,682

4,180

4,089

Federal funds sold and other

1,694

2,682

2,476

Total interest and dividend income

155,561

175,499

161,556

Interest expense

Deposits

16,582

40,914

25,687

Federal funds purchased and retail repurchase agreements

105

155

114

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

2,292

6,667

9,039

Federal Reserve Bank discount window

6

—

—

Bank stock loan

415

654

731

Subordinated debt

3,509

1,251

1,187

Total interest expense

22,909

49,641

36,758

Net interest income

132,652

125,858

124,798

Provision for loan losses

24,255

18,354

3,961

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

108,397

107,504

120,837

Non-interest income

Service charges and fees

6,856

8,672

7,250

Debit card income

9,136

8,230

6,178

Mortgage banking

3,153

2,468

1,298

Increase in value of bank-owned life insurance

1,941

1,998

2,199

Net gain on acquisition

2,145

—

—

Net gain (loss) from securities transactions

11

14

(9
)
Other

2,781

3,606

2,809

Total non-interest income

26,023

24,988

19,725

Non-interest expense

Salaries and employee benefits

54,129

52,122

48,018

Net occupancy and equipment

8,784

8,674

8,126

Data processing

10,991

10,124

8,094

Professional fees

4,282

4,734

3,402

Advertising and business development

2,498

3,075

3,002

Telecommunications

1,873

2,079

1,775

FDIC insurance

2,088

1,228

1,536

Courier and postage

1,441

1,348

1,183

Free nationwide ATM cost

1,609

1,680

1,355

Amortization of core deposit intangibles

3,850

3,168

2,443

Loan expense

789

875

1,005

Other real estate owned

2,310

707

(71
)
Merger expenses

299

915

7,462

Goodwill impairment

104,831

—

—

Other

9,216

8,906

7,057

Total non-interest expense

208,990

99,635

94,387

Income (loss) before income tax

(74,570
)

32,857

46,175

Provision for income taxes

400

7,278

10,350

Net income (loss) and net income (loss) allocable to common stockholders

$
(74,970
)

$
25,579

$
35,825

Basic earnings (loss) per share

$
(4.97
)

$
1.64

$
2.33

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

$
(4.97
)

$
1.61

$
2.28

	2020			2019			2018			2021			2020			2019
Net income (loss)	$	(74,970	)	$	25,579		$	35,825		$	52,480		$	(74,970	)	$	25,579
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period on available-for-sale securities		593			5,613			(2,845	)		(24,368	)		593			5,613
Reclassification for net gains included in net income											368			—			—
Unrealized holding gain arising from the transfer of held-to-maturity securities to available-for-sale		25,327		—			—				—			25,327		—
Amortization of unrealized losses on held-to-maturity securities		509			903			453			—			509			903
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period on cash flow hedges											(58	)		—			—
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		26,429			6,516			(2,392	)		(24,058	)		26,429			6,516
Tax effect		(6,645	)		(1,652	)		606			6,053			(6,645	)		(1,652	)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		19,784			4,864			(1,786	)		(18,005	)		19,784			4,864
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(55,186	)	$	30,443		$	34,039		$	34,475		$	(55,186	)	$	30,443

	Common Stock										Accumulated												Common Stock										Accumulated
	Shares Outstanding			Amount		Additional Paid-In Capital		Retained Earnings			Other Comprehensive Income (loss)			Treasury Stock			Employee Stock Loans			Total Stockholders’ Equity			Shares Outstanding			Amount		Additional Paid-In Capital		Retained Earnings			Other Comprehensive Income (loss)			Treasury Stock			Employee Stock Loans			Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balance at December 31, 2017		14,605,607		$	161	$	331,339	$	65,512		$	(3,092	)	$	(19,655	)	$	(121	)	$	374,144
Net income		—			—		—		35,825			—			—			—			35,825
Other comprehensive income, net of tax effects		—			—		—		—			(1,786	)		—			—			(1,786	)
Stock-based compensation, see Note 19		1,375			—		2,509		—			—			—			—			2,509
Common stock issued upon exercise of stock options		21,201			—		133		—			—			—			—			133
Adoption of ASU 2016-01 reclassifying AFS equity securities with readily determined fair value		—			—	—			(11	)		11			—			—			—
Common stock issued in connection with the acquisition of Kansas Bank Corporation, net of issuance expenses of $207		820,849			8		31,888		—			—			—			—			31,896
Common stock issued in connection with the acquisition of Adams Dairy Bancshares, Inc., net of issuance expenses of $236		344,063			4		13,216	—				—			—			—			13,220
Balance at December 31, 2018		15,793,095		$	173	$	379,085	$	101,326		$	(4,867	)	$	(19,655	)	$	(121	)	$	455,941			15,793,095		$	173	$	379,085	$	101,326		$	(4,867	)	$	(19,655	)	$	(121	)	$	455,941
Net income		—			—		—		25,579			—			—			—			25,579			—			—		—		25,579			—			—			—			25,579
Other comprehensive income, net of tax effects		—			—		—		—			4,864			—			—			4,864			—			—		—		—			4,864			—			—			4,864
Stock-based compensation, see Note 19		9,104			—		2,870		—			—			—			—			2,870			9,104			—		2,870		—			—			—			—			2,870
Common stock issued upon exercise of stock options		20,402		—			371		—			—			—			—			371			20,402			—		371		—			—			—			—			371
Repayments on employee stock loans		—			—		—		—			—			—			44			44			—			—		—		—			—			—			44			44
Common stock issued under stock-based incentive plans		23,628			1		—		—			—			—			—			1			23,628			1		—		—			—			—			—			1
Common stock issued under employee stock purchase plan		19,221			—		405		—			—			—			—			405			19,221			—		405		—			—			—			—			405
Treasury stock purchases		(421,016	)		—		—		—			—			(10,867	)		—			(10,867	)		(421,016	)		—		—		—			—			(10,867	)		—			(10,867	)
Cummulative effect of change in accounting principal from implementation of ASU 2017-08		—			—		—		(1,148	)		—			—			—			(1,148	)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principal from implementation of ASU 2017-08																								—			—		—		(1,148	)		—			—			—			(1,148	)
Balance at December 31, 2019		15,444,434		$	174	$	382,731	$	125,757		$	(3	)	$	(30,522	)	$	(77	)	$	478,060			15,444,434		$	174	$	382,731	$	125,757		$	(3	)	$	(30,522	)	$	(77	)	$	478,060
Net income																								—			—		—		(74,970	)		—			—			—			(74,970	)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax effects																								—			—		—		—			19,784			—			—			19,784
Stock-based compensation, see Note 19																								17,703			—		3,473		—			—			—			—			3,473
Common stock issued upon exercise of stock options																								1,150		—			20		—			—			—			—			20
Repayments on employee stock loans																								—			—		—		—			—			—			34			34
Common stock issued under stock-based incentive plans																								34,891			—		—		—			—			—			—			—
Common stock issued under employee stock purchase plan																								34,593			—		596		—			—			—			—			596
Treasury stock purchases																								(992,215	)		—		—		—			—			(19,348	)		—			(19,348	)
Balance at December 31, 2020																								14,540,556		$	174	$	386,820	$	50,787		$	19,781		$	(49,870	)	$	(43	)	$	407,649
Net income (loss)		—			—		—		(74,970	)		—			—			—			(74,970	)		—			—		—		52,480			—			—			—			52,480
Other comprehensive income, net of tax effects		—			—		—		—			19,784			—			—			19,784			—			—		—		—			(18,005	)		—			—			(18,005	)
Cash dividends - common stock, $0.16 per share																								—			—		—		(2,493	)		—			—			—			(2,493	)
Dividend equivalents - restricted stock units, $0.16 per share																								—			—		—		(47	)		—			—			—			(47	)
Stock-based compensation, see Note 19		17,703			—		3,473		—			—			—			—			3,473			10,242			—		2,906		—			—			—			—			2,906
Common stock issued upon exercise of stock options		1,150			—		20		—			—			—			—			20			247,895			3		3,845		—			—			—			—			3,848
Repayments on employee stock loans		—			—	—			—			—			—			34			34			—			—	—			—			—			—			43			43
Common stock issued under stock-based incentive plan		34,891			—		—		—			—			—			—			—			74,454			1		—		—			—			—			—			1
Common stock issued under employee stock purchase plan		34,593			—		596		—			—			—			—			596			33,655			—		569		—			—			—			—			569
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principal from implementation of ASU 2016-13																								—			—		—		(12,403	)		—			—			—			(12,403	)
ASBI merger																								2,485,983			25		84,722		—			—			—			—			84,747
Treasury stock purchases		(992,215	)		—		—		—			—			(19,348	)		—			(19,348	)		(613,756	)		—		—		—			—			(18,664	)		—			(18,664	)
Balance at December 31, 2020		14,540,556		$	174	$	386,820	$	50,787		$	19,781		$	(49,870	)	$	(43	)	$	407,649
Balance at December 31, 2021																								16,779,029		$	203	$	478,862	$	88,324		$	1,776		$	(68,534	)	$	—		$	500,631

	2020			2019			2018			2021			2020			2019
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income (loss)	$	(74,970	)	$	25,579		$	35,825		$	52,480		$	(74,970	)	$	25,579
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash from operating activities:
Stock-based compensation		3,473			2,870			2,509			2,906			3,473			2,870
Depreciation		3,726			3,565			3,130			4,186			3,726			3,565
Amortization of operating lease right-of-use asset		613			629			—			480			613			629
Amortization of cloud computing implementation costs		109			100			—			171			109			100
Provision for loan losses		24,255			18,354			3,961
Provision (reversal) for credit losses											(8,480	)		24,255			18,354
Goodwill impairment		104,831			—			—			—			104,831			—
Net amortization (accretion) of purchase valuation adjustments		(2,492	)		(4,360	)		(5,586	)		18,001			(2,492	)		(4,360	)
Amortization (accretion) of premiums and discounts on securities		5,885			5,828			3,062			9,638			5,885			5,828
Amortization of intangible assets		3,898			3,218			2,492			4,242			3,898			3,218
Deferred income taxes		(11,089	)		1,563			3,483			1,592			(11,089	)		1,563
Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends		(610	)		(994	)		(1,402	)		(55	)		(610	)		(994	)
Loss (gain) on sales and valuation adjustments on other real estate owned		1,562			68			(580	)		(839	)		1,562			68
Net loss (gain) on sales and settlements of securities		—			—			(1	)		(373	)		—			—
Change in unrealized (gains) losses on equity securities		(11	)		(14	)		11			(68	)		(11	)		(14	)
Loss (gain) on disposal of premises and equipment		7			(19	)		(182	)		(18	)		7			(19	)
Loss (gain) on lease termination		—			(7	)		—			(2	)		—			(7	)
Loss (gain) on sales of foreclosed assets		283			25			(17	)		(36	)		283			25
Loss (gain) on sales of loans		(2,627	)		(2,062	)		(1,072	)		(2,804	)		(2,627	)		(2,062	)
Originations of loans held for sale		(118,413	)		(99,686	)		(48,576	)		(101,149	)		(118,413	)		(99,686	)
Proceeds from the sale of loans held for sale		113,981			98,787			48,271			111,986			113,981			98,787
Increase in the value of bank-owned life insurance		(1,941	)		(1,998	)		(2,199	)		(3,506	)		(1,941	)		(1,998	)
Change in fair value of derivatives recognized in earnings		259			308			271			(336	)		259			308
Gain on acquisition		(2,145	)		—			—			(585	)		(2,145	)		—
Payments on operating lease payable		(701	)		(760	)		—			(608	)		(701	)		(760	)
Net change in:
Interest receivable		478			1,649			(2,255	)		1,672			478			1,649
Other assets		(6,253	)		(3,823	)		(5,738	)		(6,503	)		(6,253	)		(3,823	)
Interest payable and other liabilities		1,513			(299	)		1,259			20,706			1,513			(299	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		43,621			48,521			36,666			102,698			43,621			48,521
Cash flows (to) from investing activities
Purchases of available-for-sale securities		(265,826	)		—			(36,007	)		(785,297	)		(265,826	)		—
Purchases of held-to-maturity securities		(2,754	)		(154,573	)		(150,479	)		—			(2,754	)		(154,573	)
Proceeds from sales, calls, pay-downs and maturities of available-for- sale securities		178,502			30,633			58,739
Proceeds from sales, calls, pay-downs and maturities of available-for-sale securities											472,894			178,502			30,633
Proceeds from calls, pay-downs and maturities of held-to-maturity securities		156,963			129,349			73,098			—			156,963			129,349
Net change in interest-bearing time deposits in other banks		2,249			2,493			2,742			249			2,249			2,493
Net change in loans		(13,331	)		8,537			(135,500	)		218,107			(13,331	)		8,537
Purchase of mortgage loans											(363,892	)		—			—
Purchase of USDA guaranteed loans											(10,958	)		—			—
Capitalized construction cost of other real estate owned		(62	)		(56	)		—			—			(62	)		(56	)
Purchase of premises and equipment		(9,549	)		(6,948	)		(8,831	)		(5,101	)		(9,549	)		(6,948	)
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment		10			21			1,254			24			10			21
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets		2,002			410			217			161			2,002			410
Net redemptions (purchases) of Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock		15,518			(928	)		(1,891	)		3,212			15,518			(928	)
Net redemptions (purchases) of correspondent and miscellaneous other stock		(6	)		—			—			(82	)		(6	)		—
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned		6,363			1,803			4,730			4,732			6,363			1,803
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance											(25,000	)		—			—
Proceeds from bank-owned life insurance death benefits		—			—			347			1,749			—			—
Net cash (paid) received from acquisition of Eastman		—			—			(55	)
Net cash (paid) received from acquisition of KBC		—			—			12,774
Net cash (paid) received from acquisition of Adams		—			—			(1,385	)
Net cash (paid) received from acquisition of City Bank		—			—			8,759
Net cash (paid) received from acquisition of MidFirst locations		—			85,360			—			—			—			85,360
Net cash (paid) received from acquisition of Almena											—			25,925			—
Net cash (paid) received from acquisition of ASBI											102,710			—			—

Net cash (paid) received from acquisition of Almena		25,925			—			—
Net cash (paid) received from acquisition of Security Bank locations											71,153			—			—
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		96,004			96,101			(171,488	)		(315,339	)		96,004			96,101
Cash flows (to) from financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in deposits		321,524			(158,652	)		228,924			228,515			321,524			(158,652	)
Net change in federal funds purchased and retail repurchase agreements		69			(14,360	)		12,576			5,765			69			(14,360	)
Net borrowings (repayments) on Federal Home Loan Bank line of credit		(311,223	)		(57,547	)		20,078			—			(311,223	)		(57,547	)
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank term advances		253,000			—			—			302,906			253,000			—
Principal repayments on Federal Home Loan Bank term advances		(255,988	)		(2,954	)		(1,214	)		(327,422	)		(255,988	)		(2,954	)
Proceeds from Federal Reserve Bank discount window		62,000			—			—			1,000			62,000			—
Principal payments on Federal Reserve Bank discount window		(62,000	)		—			—			(1,000	)		(62,000	)		—
Borrowings on bank stock loan		38,354			7,209			22,500			—			38,354			7,209
Principal repayments on bank stock loan		(47,344	)		(13,669	)		(9,550	)		—			(47,344	)		(13,669	)
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options		20			371			133			3,847			20			371
Principal payments on employee stock loan		34			44			—			43			34			44
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan		596			405			—			569			596			405
Proceeds from subordinated notes		75,000			—			—			—			75,000			—
Debt issue cost of subordinated notes		(2,265	)		—			—			(16	)		(2,265	)		—
Purchase of treasury stock		(19,348	)		(10,867	)		—			(18,664	)		(19,348	)		(10,867	)
Net change in contractual obligations		(647	)		1,871			1,998			(2,497	)		(647	)		1,871
Dividends paid on common stock											(1,149	)		—			—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		51,782			(248,149	)		275,445			191,897			51,782			(248,149	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		191,407			(103,527	)		140,623			(20,744	)		191,407			(103,527	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		89,291			192,818			52,195			280,698			89,291			192,818
Ending cash and cash equivalents	$	280,698		$	89,291		$	192,818		$	259,954		$	280,698		$	89,291
Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	25,673		$	48,367		$	32,667		$	15,028		$	25,673		$	48,367
Income taxes paid, net of refunds		11,608			3,108			9,214			4,586			11,608			3,108
Supplemental noncash disclosures:
Other real estate owned acquired in settlement of loans		8,684			3,737			2,307			1,184			8,684			3,737
Other real estate owned transferred from premise and equipment		1,982			—			—			1,038			1,982			—
Other repossessed assets acquired in settlement of loans											28,858			—			—
Operating leases recognized		—			4,814			—			32			—			4,814
Total fair value of assets acquired in purchase of KBC, net of cash		—			—			308,225
Total fair value of liabilities assumed in purchase of KBC		—			—			289,103
Total fair value of assets acquired in purchase of Adams, net of cash		—			—			117,010
Total fair value of liabilities assumed in purchase of Adams		—			—			102,406
Total fair value of assets acquired in purchase of City Bank, net of cash		—			—			135,594
Total fair value of liabilities assumed in purchase of City Bank		—			—			144,353
Total fair value of assets acquired in purchase of MidFirst locations, net of cash		—			13,246			—			—			—			13,246
Total fair value of liabilities assumed in purchase of MidFirst locations		—			98,606			—			—			—			98,606
Total fair value of assets acquired in purchase of Almena, net of cash		40,984			—			—			—			40,984			—
Total fair value of liabilities assumed in purchase of Almena locations		64,764			—			—			—			64,764			—
Total fair value of assets acquired in purchase of ASBI, net of cash											679,902			—			—
Total fair value of liabilities assumed in purchase of ASBI											706,635			—			—
Total fair value of assets acquired in purchase of Security locations, net of cash											4,684			—			—
Total fair value of liabilities assumed in purchase of Security locations											76,503			—			—

Nature of Operations: Equity Bancshares, Inc. is a bank holding company, whose principal activity is the ownership and management of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Equity Bank (“Equity Bank”) and EBAC, LLC (“EBAC”). SA Holdings, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Equity Bank and was established for the purpose of holding and selling other real estate owned. These entities are collectively referred to as the “Company”. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Equity Bank is a Kansas state-chartered bank and member of the Federal Reserve (state Fed member bank jointly supervised by both the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City and the Office of the Kansas State Bank Commissioner).

The Company is primarily engaged in providing a full range of banking, mortgage banking and financial services to individual and corporate customers generally in Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma. Equity Bank competes with a variety of other financial institutions including large regional banks, community banks and thrifts as well as credit unions and other non-traditional lenders.

Use of Estimates: To prepare financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, management makes estimates and assumptions based on available information. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the disclosures provided and actual results could differ.

Risk and Uncertainties: The outbreak of COVID-19 has adversely impacted a broad range of industries in which the Company’s customers operate and could impair their ability to fulfill their financial obligations to the Company. The World Health Organization ~~has~~ declared COVID-19 ~~to be~~ a global ~~pandemic indicating that almost all public commerce and related business activities could be impacted, to varying degrees, with the goal of decreasing the rate of new infections.~~pandemic. The spread of the outbreak ~~has~~ caused significant disruptions in the U.S. economy and ~~has~~ disrupted banking and other financial activity in the areas in which the Company operates. While there has been no material impact to the Company’s employees to date, COVID-19 could also potentially create widespread business continuity issues for the Company. Congress, the President and the Federal Reserve have taken several actions designed to cushion the economic fallout from ~~COVID-19.~~COVID-19 which, to date, have been successful in driving the re-opening of businesses and communities, however risk remains.

The Company’s business is dependent upon the willingness and ability of its employees and customers to conduct banking and other financial transactions. If the global response to contain COVID-19 is unsuccessful, the Company could experience a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. It is not possible to know the full universe or extent of impact to the Company’s operations brought about from COVID-19 and resulting measures to curtail its spread.

Cash Equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents include cash, deposits with other financial institutions with original maturities less than 90 days and federal funds sold. Net cash flows are reported for customer loan and deposit transactions, interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions, federal funds purchased, retail repurchase agreements, Federal Home Loan Bank advances and contractual obligations.

Securities: Securities are classified as held-to-maturity when management has the positive intent and ability to hold them to maturity. Securities are classified as available-for-sale when they might be sold before maturity. Held-to-maturity securities are carried at amortized cost while available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses reported in other comprehensive income, net of tax.

Interest income includes amortization of purchase premium or discount. Premiums and discounts on mortgage-backed securities are amortized using the level-yield method over the estimated cash flows of the securities. This method requires retrospective adjustment of the effective yield each time a payment is received, or changes occur in the estimated remaining cash flows, which adjusts life-to-date amortization. Premiums and discounts on other investments are amortized using the level-yield method to contractual maturity or first call date, if purchased at a premium.

~~Management~~Allowance for Credit Losses - Securities: The Company adopted ASU 2016-13, also referred to as CECL, effective January 1, 2021, and with that adoption the Company’s method for estimating the allowance for credit losses for securities has changed. The allowance for credit losses “ACL” on held-to-maturity securities is determined on a collective basis by major security type and portfolio. Losses are charged against the allowance for credit losses when the Company determines the held-to-maturity security is uncollectible. The Company does not estimate credit losses on held-to-maturity security accrued interest receivable.

For available-for-sale debt securities in an unrealized loss position, the Company first assesses whether it intends to sell, or is more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of the criteria regarding

intent or requirement to sell is met, the security’s amortized cost basis is written down to fair value through income. For securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the Company evaluates whether the decline in fair value has resulted from credit losses or other factors. In making this assessment, the Company considers the extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost, the current interest rate environment, changes to rating of the security or security issuer, and adverse conditions specifically related to the security, among other factors. If this assessment indicates that a credit loss exists, the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security are compared to the amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of cash flows expected to be collected was less than the amortized cost basis, a credit loss existed and an allowance for credit losses would be recorded for the credit loss, which is limited by the amount that the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis. Any impairment that has not been recorded through an allowance for credit losses is recognized in other comprehensive income. Changes in the allowance for credit losses are recorded as provision for or reversal of credit loss expense. Losses are charged against the allowance for credit losses when the Company determines the available-for-sale security is uncollectible or when either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met. The Company does not estimate credit losses on available-for-sale security accrued interest receivable.

Pre CECL Adoption – Other-than-Temporary Impairment - Securities: Prior to the adoption of CECL, management evaluated securities for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) on at least a quarterly basis and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. For securities in an unrealized loss position, management ~~considers~~considered the extent and duration of the unrealized loss and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer. Management also ~~assesses~~assessed whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it ~~will be~~would have been required to sell, a security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell iswere met, the entire

difference between amortized cost and fair value is recognized as impairment through earnings. For debt securities that dodid not meet the aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment is split into two components as follows: 1) OTTI related to credit loss, ~~which must~~would be recognized in the income statement and 2) OTTI related to other factors, which is recognized in other comprehensive income. The credit loss is defined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis.

Equity Investments with Readily determinable Fair Value: Equity investments with a readily determinable fair value are measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. ~~The exit price concept is used when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes.~~

Loans Held for Sale: Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or fair value. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recorded as a valuation allowance and charged to earnings. Mortgage loans held for sale are sold with servicing rights released. Gains or losses on loans held for sale are recognized upon completion of the sale and based on the difference between the net sales proceeds and the carrying value of the sold loan.

Loans: Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at the principal balance outstanding, net of previous charge-offs and an allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses, and for purchased loans, net of unamortized purchase premiums and discounts. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance.

Purchased Credit Impaired ~~Loans.~~Loans: As a part of acquisitions prior to the Company’s January 1, 2021 adoption of CECL, the Company acquired certain loans, for which there was, at acquisition, evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination. These purchased credit impaired loans were recorded at the acquisition date fair value, such that there is no carryover of the seller’s allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses. After acquisition, losses are recognized by an increase in the allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses. Such purchase credit impaired loans are accounted for individually. Upon the Company’s adoption of ASU 2016-13, the remaining credit-related discount on these assets was reclassified to the allowance for credit losses. The Company ~~estimates~~elected the ~~amount~~prospective transition approach and ~~timing of expected cash flows for each loan, and the expected cash flows in excess of the amount paid~~all loans previously considered purchased credit impaired are ~~recorded~~now classified as ~~interest~~purchased with credit deterioration. The remaining non-credit discount will continue to be accreted into income over the remaining ~~life~~lives of the loan (accretable yield). During acquisitions, if the Company expects to liquidate the loan collateral in a relatively short period of time, the Company will assign no value to accretable yield as the impact is immaterial. The excess of the loan’s contractual principal and interest over expected cash flows is not recorded (non-accretable difference). Over the life of the loan, expected cash flows continue to be estimated. If the present value of the expected cash flows is less than the carrying amount, a loss is recorded. If the present value of the expected cash flows is greater than the carrying amount, it is recognized as part of future interest income.assets.

Nonaccrual Loans. Generally, loans are designated as nonaccrual when either principal or interest payments are 90 days or more past due based on contractual terms unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection. Consumer loans are typically ~~charged-off~~charged off no later than 180 days past due. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or ~~charged-off~~charged off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, unpaid interest credited to income is reversed against income. Future interest income may be recorded on a cash basis after recovery of principal is reasonably assured. Nonaccrual loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

Impaired Loans. APrior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13 on January 1, 2021, a loan iswas considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company ~~will~~would be unable to collect all contractual principal and interest due according to the terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans ~~are~~were measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or on the value of the underlying collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The Company ~~evaluates~~evaluated the collectability of both principal and interest when assessing the need for a loss accrual.

Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that ~~experience~~experienced insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally ~~are~~were not classified as impaired. Management ~~determines~~determined the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.

Troubled Debt Restructurings. In cases where a borrower experiences financial difficulties and the Company makes certain concessionary modifications to contractual terms, the loan is classified as a troubled debt restructured loan and classified as impaired. Generally, a nonaccrual loan that is a troubled debt restructuring remains on nonaccrual until such time that repayment of the remaining principal and interest is not in doubt and the borrower has a period of satisfactory repayment performance.

Allowance for Credit Losses – Post CECL Adoption - Loans: As described below under Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements, the Company adopted the FASB ASU 2016-13 effective January 1, 2021, which requires the estimation of an allowance for credit losses in accordance with the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) methodology. Management assesses the adequacy of the allowance on a quarterly basis. This assessment includes procedures to estimate the allowance and test the adequacy and appropriateness of the resulting balance. The level of the allowance is based upon management’s evaluation of historical default and loss experience, current and projected economic conditions, asset quality trends, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay a loan (including the timing of future payments), the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, industry and peer bank loan quality indications and other pertinent factors, including regulatory recommendations. The level of the allowance for credit losses maintained by management is believed adequate to absorb all expected future losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is adjusted through provision for credit losses and charge-offs, net of recoveries of amounts previously charged off. The Company adopted ASU 2016-13 using the modified retrospective method for all financial assets measured at amortized cost and off-balance sheet credit exposures. Results for the reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2021, are presented under ASU 2016-13, while prior amounts continue to be reported in accordance with previously applicable GAAP.

The Company adopted ASU 2016-13 using the prospective transition approach for financial assets purchased with credit deterioration (“PCD”) that were previously classified as purchased credit impaired (“PCI”) and accounted for under ASC 310-30. In accordance with the standard, management did not reassess whether PCI assets met the criteria of PCD assets as of the date of adoption. On January 1, 2021, the amortized cost basis of the PCD assets were adjusted to reflect the addition of $10,438 to the allowance for credit losses. The remaining noncredit discount (based on the adjusted amortized cost basis) will be accreted into interest income at the effective interest rate as of January 1, 2021.

The allowance for credit losses is measured on a collective basis for pools of loans with similar risk characteristics. The Company has identified the following pools of financial assets with similar risk characteristics for measuring expected credit losses.

• Commercial real estate mortgage loans – Owner occupied commercial real estate mortgage loans are secured by commercial office buildings, industrial buildings, warehouses or retail buildings where the owner of the building occupies the property. For such loans, repayment is largely dependent upon the operation of the borrower's business.

• Commercial and industrial loans – Commercial and industrial loans include loans to business enterprises issued for commercial, industrial and/or other professional purposes. These loans are generally secured by equipment, inventory and accounts receivable of the borrower and repayment is primarily dependent on business cash flows.

• Residential real estate mortgage loans – Residential real estate mortgage consists primarily of loans secured by 1-4 family residential properties, including home equity lines of credit. Repayment is primarily dependent on the personal cash flow of the borrower.

• Agricultural real estate loans – Agricultural real estate loans are secured by real estate related to farmland and are affected by the value of farmland. Generally, the borrower’s ability to repay is based on the value of farmland and cash flows from farming operations.

• Agricultural production loans – Agricultural production loans are primarily operating lines subject to annual farming revenues, including productivity and yield of farm products and market pricing at the time of sale.

• Consumer – Consumer loans include all loans issued to individuals not included in the categories above. Examples of consumer and other loans are automobile loans, consumer credit cards and loans to finance education, among others. Many consumer loans are unsecured. Repayment is primarily dependent on the personal cash flow of the borrower.

The Company primarily utilizes a probability of default (“PD”) and loss given default (“LGD”) modeling approach for historical loss coupled with a macroeconomic factor analysis derived from a statistical regression of loss experience correlated to changes in economic factors for all commercial banks operating within our geographical footprint. The macroeconomic regression is based on a multivariate approach and includes key indicators that provide the highest cumulative adjusted R-square figure. Economic factors include, but are not limited to, national unemployment, gross domestic product, market interest rates and property pricing indices. To arrive at the most predictive calculation, a lag factor was applied to these inputs, resulting in current and historic economic inputs driving the projection of loss over our reasonable, supportable forecast period which management has defined as 12 months for all portfolio segments. Following the reasonable and supportable forecast period loss experience immediately reverts to the longer run historical loss experience of the Company. The resultant loss rates are applied to the estimated future exposure at default (“EAD”), as determined based on contractual amortization terms through an average default month and estimated prepayment experience in arriving at the quantitative reserve within our allowance for credit losses.

The estimated loan losses for all loan segments are adjusted for changes in qualitative factors not inherently considered in the quantitative analyses. The qualitative categories and the measurements used to quantify the risks within each of these categories are subjectively selected by management but measured by objective measurements period over period. The data for each measurement may be obtained from internal or external sources. The current period measurements are evaluated and assigned a factor commensurate with the current level of risk relative to past measurements over time. The resulting qualitative adjustments are applied to the relevant collectively evaluated loan portfolios. These adjustments are based upon quarterly trend assessments in projective economic sentiment, portfolio concentrations, policy exceptions, personnel retention, independent loan review results, collateral considerations, risk ratings and competition. The qualitative allowance allocation, as determined by the processes noted above, is increased or decreased for each loan segment based on the assessment of these various qualitative factors. Due to the inclusion of a lag factor in our quantitative economic analysis discussed above, the allowance for credit losses, as of implementation and through the reporting date, is heavily influenced by the qualitative economic factor considered by management to be reflective of risk associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.

Loans that do not share similar risk characteristics with the collectively evaluated pools are evaluated on an individual basis and are excluded from the collectively evaluated loan pools. Such loans are evaluated for credit losses based on either discounted cash flows or the fair value of collateral. When management determines that foreclosure is probable, expected credit losses are based on the fair value of the collateral, less selling costs. For loans for which foreclosure is not probable, but for which repayment is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral, the Company has elected the practical expedient under ASC 326 to estimate expected credit losses based on the fair value of collateral, with selling costs considered in the event sale of the collateral is expected. Loans for which terms have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) are evaluated using these same individual evaluation methods. In the event the discounted cash flow method is used for a TDR, the original interest rate is used to discount expected cash flows.

In assessing the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses, the Company considers the results of the Company’s ongoing, independent loan review process. The Company undertakes this process both to ascertain those loans in the portfolio with elevated credit risk and to assist in its overall evaluation of the risk characteristics of the entire loan portfolio. Its loan review process includes the judgment of management, independent internal loan reviewers and reviews that may have been conducted by third-party reviewers including regulatory examiners. The Company incorporates relevant loan review results when determining the allowance.

In accordance with CECL, losses are estimated over the remaining contractual terms of loans, adjusted for estimated prepayments. The contractual term excludes expected extensions, renewals and modifications unless management has a reasonable expectation at the reporting date that a troubled debt restructuring will be executed or such renewals, extensions or modifications are included in the original loan agreement and are not unconditionally cancellable by the Company. Credit losses are estimated on the amortized cost basis of loans, which includes the principal balance outstanding, purchase discounts and premiums and loan fees and costs. Accrued interest receivable, as allowed under ASU 2016-13, is excluded from the credit loss estimate. In addition, accrued interest receivable is presented separately on the balance sheets and is excluded from the tabular loan disclosures in Note 4.

However, as COVID-19 impacted our lending operations, the company has been assessing economic conditions and increasing the allowance for credit losses through adjustments of qualitative adjustment factors as necessary. The Company’s policies and procedures used to estimate the allowance for credit losses, as well as the resultant provision for credit losses charged to income, are considered adequate by management and are reviewed periodically by regulators, model validators and internal audit, they are inherently approximate estimates and imprecise. There are factors beyond the Company’s control, such as changes in projected

economic conditions, real estate markets or particular industry conditions which may materially impact asset quality and the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses and thus the resulting provision for credit losses.

Allowance for Credit Losses – Pre CECL Adoption – Loans - The allowance for credit losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses. ~~Loan~~Credit losses ~~are~~were charged against the allowance when management ~~believes~~believed the collectability of a ~~loan~~credit balance iswas unlikely. Subsequent recoveries, if any, ~~are~~were credited to the allowance. Management ~~estimates~~estimated the allowance balance required using past ~~loan~~credit loss experience, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values,

economic conditions and other factors. A loan review process, independent of the loan approval process, is utilized by management to verify loans are being made and administered in accordance with Company policy, to review loan risk grades and potential losses, to verify that potential problem loans are receiving adequate and timely corrective measures to avoid or reduce losses and to assist in the verification of the adequacy of the ~~loan~~credit loss reserve. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged off.

The allowance ~~consists~~consisted of specific and general components. The specific component ~~relates~~related to loans that are individually classified as impaired. If a loan iswas impaired, a portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported net at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment iswas expected solely from the sale of the collateral. Troubled debt restructurings ~~are~~were separately identified for impairment disclosures and are measured at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s effective rate at inception. If a troubled debt restructuring iswas considered to be a collateral dependent loan, the loan is reported, net, at the fair value of the collateral. For troubled debt restructurings that subsequently ~~default,~~defaulted, the Company ~~determines~~determined the amount of reserve in accordance with the accounting policy for the allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses.

The general component of the allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses ~~covers~~covered non-impaired loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current factors. The historical loss experience is determined by portfolio and class and is based on the actual loss history experienced by the Company. This actual loss experience iswas then adjusted by comparing current conditions to the conditions that existed during the loss history. The Company ~~considers~~considered the changes related to (i) lending policies, (ii) economic conditions, (iii) nature and volume of the loan portfolio and class, (iv) lending staff, (v) volume and severity of past due, non-accrual and risk graded loans, (vi) loan review system, (vii) value of underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans, (viii) concentration levels and (ix) effects of other external factors.

The Company ~~considers~~considered loan performance and collateral values in assessing risk for each class in the loan portfolio, as follows:

~~There have been no material changes~~Allowance for Credit Losses – Off-Balance-Sheet Credit Exposures

Subsequent to the ~~Company’s accounting policies related~~January 1, 2021, adoption of ASU 2016-13, the Company estimates expected credit losses over the contractual term of obligations to ~~its~~extend credit, unless the obligation is unconditionally cancellable. The allowance for ~~loan loss methodology~~off-balance-

sheet exposures is adjusted through other noninterest expense. The estimates are determined based on the likelihood of funding during ~~2020~~the contractual term and ~~2019. However, as COVID-19 impacted our lending operations,~~an estimate of credit losses subsequent to funding. Estimated credit losses on subsequently funded balances are based on the ~~company has been assessing economic conditions and increasing the allowance for loan~~same assumptions used to estimate credit losses ~~through adjustments of qualitative adjustment factors as necessary.~~on existing funded loans.

Transfers of Financial Assets: Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales when control over the assets has been relinquished. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when the assets have been isolated from the Company, the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets and the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.

Bank-Owned Life Insurance: The Company maintains insurance policies on certain key executives as well as policies from acquired institutions. Bank-owned life insurance is recorded at the amount that can be realized under the insurance contract at the balance sheet date, which is the cash surrender value adjusted for other charges or other amounts due that are probable at settlement.

In some cases, the Company has entered into agreements with the insured which would require it to make one-time payments to the insured’s beneficiaries if certain conditions exist at the time of death.

Other Real Estate Owned: Assets acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value less estimated cost to sell when acquired, thereby establishing a new cost basis. Generally, collateral properties are recorded as other real estate owned when the Company takes physical possession. Physical possession of residential real estate collateral occurs when legal title is obtained upon completion of foreclosure or when the borrower conveys all interest in the property to satisfy the loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through a similar legal agreement. Other real estate owned properties are subsequently accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. If fair value declines subsequent to foreclosure, a valuation allowance is recorded through expense. Operating costs after acquisition are expensed.

Premises and Equipment: Land is carried at cost. Premises and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is an estimate and is charged to expense using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. The useful lives of buildings and related components are estimated to be 39 years. The useful lives of furniture, fixtures and equipment are estimated to be 4 to 7 years. Leasehold improvements are capitalized and depreciated using the straight-line method over the terms of the respective leases or the estimated useful lives of the improvements, whichever is shorter. Property held for sale is carried at the lower of cost or fair value.

Premises and equipment and other long-term assets are reviewed for impairment when events indicate their carrying amount may not be recoverable from future undiscounted cash flows. If impaired, the assets are recorded at fair value.

Lease Obligation. The Company evaluates contracts that convey the right to control the use of identified property, plant or equipment for a period of time for consideration to determine if they are lease obligations. The Company evaluates each lease component to determine if the lease qualifies as a financing lease or as an operating lease. Leases that meet any of the following criteria are considered financing leases: (1) the lease transfers ownership of the underlying asset by the end of the lease term; (2) the lease grants the Company an option to purchase the underlying asset that the Company is reasonably certain to exercise; (3) the lease term is the major part of the remaining economic life of the underlying asset; (4) the present value of the sum of the lease payments and any residual value guaranteed by the Company that is not already reflected in lease payments equals or exceeds substantially all of the fair value of the underlying asset; or (5) the underlying asset is of such a specialized nature that it is expected to have no alternative use to the lessor at the end of the lease term. If none of the financing lease criteria are met, the lease is considered an operating lease.

The Company evaluates each lease to determine the lease term which will be used based on the type and use of the leased equipment and future expected changes in operations. The resulting lease term will consist of the non-cancellable period for which the Company has the right to use the underlying asset plus (1) periods covered by an option to extend the lease if the Company is reasonably certain to exercise that option; (2) periods covered by an option to terminate the lease if the Company is reasonably certain not to exercise that option; and (3) periods covered by an option to extend the lease in which exercise of the option is controlled by the lessor. The Company has certain leases that contain options to extend the lease and contain options for changes in lease payments which are evaluated by the Company to determine the recorded values for right-of-use assets and lease liability.

Lease payments that are contractually known at lease inception are used by the Company for calculating the right-of-use asset and lease liability. Lease payments that vary because of facts or circumstances after the commencement date of the lease from other than passage of time are treated as variable lease payments and are recorded to lease expense in the period in which the obligation for the payments are incurred by the Company. Variable lease payments are not part of the lease payments for determining the right-of-use asset or the lease liability at the lease commencement date.

The discount rate to initially determine the present value of the lease payments is based on the information available at the lease commencement date and is either the rate implicit in the lease or the Company’s incremental borrowing rate. If the rate implicit in the lease is known or determinable, that rate shall be used. If that rate is not known, the Company’s incremental borrowing rate shall be

used. At January 1, 2019, implementation of this accounting guidance, the Company’s incremental borrowing rate based on the remaining lease term was used to calculate the right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities.

Operating lease right-of-use assets and lease obligations are accounted for subsequent to initial recording by amortizing the right-of-use asset over the lease term on a straight-line method while the lease obligation is increased by the accrual of interest and decreased by subsequent lease payments. Operating lease right-of-use asset amortization and lease obligation interest are reported in non-interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Operating lease payments and variable lease payments are reflected within cash flows from operating activities in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

Financing lease right-of-use assets and lease obligations are accounted for subsequent to initial recording by amortizing the right-of-use asset similar to owned assets over the lesser of the lease term or economic life of the asset if the lease transfers ownership of the leased asset while the lease obligation is increased by the accrual of interest and decreased by subsequent lease payments. Financing lease right-of-use asset amortization is reported in non-interest expense, similar to other owned assets, and lease obligation interest accruals are reported in interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Financing lease obligation principal

payments are reflected within cash flows from financing activities and interest payments and variable lease payments are reflected with the cash flows from operating activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

The Company evaluates lease modifications and will consider the modification a new contract if the modification grants the lessee an additional right of use not included in the original lease and the lease payments increase commensurate with the stand-alone price for the additional right-of-use asset. The Company will reallocate the remaining consideration in the contract and remeasure the lease liability using a discount rate for the lease determined at the effective date of the lease modification if the contract modification does any of the following: (1) grants the Company an additional right of use that was not included in the original contract; (2) extends or reduces the term of an existing lease; (3) fully or partially terminates an existing lease; or (4) changes the consideration in the contract only. The Company will recognize the remeasurement of the lease liability for the modification as an adjustment of the right-of-use asset when the contract modification grants additional right-of-use-assets, extends or reduces the term of the lease or changes the consideration of the lease contract. In the case of full or partial termination of the lease, the Company will decrease the carrying amount of the right-of-use-asset on a proportionate basis to the reduction in the lease liability with a gain or loss recognized for the difference between the lease liability adjustment and right of use asset adjustment.

If the Company modifies an operating lease, where the Company is the lessor, and the modification is not accounted for as a separate contract, the Company will account for the modification as if it were a termination of the existing lease and the creation of a new lease that commences on the effective date of the modification as follows:

If the Company modifies a direct financing lease, where the Company is the lessor, and the modification is not accounted for as a separate contract, the Company will account for the modified lease as follows:

If the Company modifies a sales-type lease, where the Company is the lessor, and the modification is not accounted for as a separate contract, the Company will account for the modified lease as follows:

Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock: Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) and Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stocks are required investments for institutions that are members of the FRB and FHLB systems. FRB and FHLB stocks are carried at cost, considered restricted securities and are periodically evaluated for impairment based on the ultimate recovery of par value. Both cash and stock dividends are reported as income.

Goodwill and Core Deposit Intangibles: Goodwill results from business acquisitions and represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of acquired tangible assets and liabilities and identifiable intangible assets. Core deposit intangibles are acquired customer relationships arising from whole bank and branch acquisitions. Core deposit intangibles are initially measured at fair value and then amortized over their estimated useful lives using an accelerated method. The useful lives of the core deposits are estimated to generally be between seven and ten years. Goodwill and core deposit intangibles are assessed at least annually for impairment and any such impairment is recognized and expensed in the period identified. The Company has selected December 31 as the date to perform its annual goodwill impairment test. Goodwill is the only intangible asset with an indefinite useful life.

Credit Related Financial Instruments: Credit related financial instruments include off-balance-sheet credit instruments, such as commitments to make loans and commercial letters of credit, issued to meet customer financing needs. The face amount for these items represents the exposure to loss before considering customer collateral or ability to repay. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded.

Derivatives: The Company is exposed to interest rate risk primarily from the effect of interest rate changes on its interest-earning assets and its sources of funding these assets. The Company will periodically enter into interest rate swaps or interest rate caps/floors to manage certain interest rate risk exposure.

An interest rate swap is an agreement between 2 entities to exchange cash flows in the future. The agreement sets the dates on which the cash flows will be paid and the manner in which the cash flows will be calculated. Typically, an interest rate swap transaction is used as an exchange of cash flows based on a fixed rate for cash flows based on a variable rate.

In an interest rate cap agreement, a cash flow is generated if the price or interest rate of an underlying variable rises above a certain threshold price or interest rate. In an interest rate floor agreement, a cash flow is generated if the price or interest rate of an underlying variable falls below a certain threshold price or interest rate. Caps and floors are designed as protection against the interest rate on a variable rate asset or liability rising above or falling below a certain level.

At the inception of a derivative contract, the Company designates the derivatives as one of three types. These three types are: (1) a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment (“fair value hedge”); (2) a hedge of a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (“cash flow hedge”); or (3) an instrument with no hedging designation (“stand-alone derivative”).

Beginning January 1, 2019, the Company adopted new hedge accounting guidance that requires the following presentation of gains/(losses) on derivatives and hedging activities for qualifying hedges. For a fair value hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative, as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item and net interest settlements, are recognized in net interest income in the same line as the earnings effect of the hedged item. For a cash flow hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative is reported in other comprehensive income and is reclassified into earnings in the same periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting are reported currently in earnings as non-interest income.

Prior to January 1, 2019, gains/(losses) on derivatives and hedging activities for qualifying hedges were presented as follows. For a fair value hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative, as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item were recognized in current earnings as fair value changes. For a cash flow hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative was reported in other comprehensive income and was reclassified into earnings in the same periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. For both types of hedges, changes in the fair value of derivatives that were not highly effective in hedging the changes in fair value or expected cash flows of the hedged item were recognized immediately in current earnings. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that did not qualify for hedge accounting were reported in earnings as non-interest income.

Net cash settlements on derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting are recorded in interest income or interest expense, based on the item being hedged. Net cash settlements on derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting are reported in non-interest income. Cash flows on hedges are classified in the cash flow statement the same as the cash flows of the items being hedged unless the derivative meets the criteria to be a financing derivative. All derivatives are recognized in the consolidated balance sheet at their fair values and are reported as either derivative assets or derivative liabilities net of accrued net settlements and collateral, if any. The individual derivative amounts are netted by counterparty when the netting requirements have been met. If these netted values are positive, they are classified as an asset and, if negative, they are classified as a liability.

The Company formally documents the relationship between derivatives and hedged items, as well as the risk-management objective and the strategy for undertaking hedge transactions at the inception of the hedging relationship. This documentation includes linking fair value or cash flow hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or to specific firm commitments or forecasted transactions. The Company also formally assesses, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, at least quarterly, whether the derivative instruments that are used are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged items. The Company discontinues hedge accounting when it determines that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item, the derivative is settled or terminates, a hedged forecasted transaction is no longer probable, a hedged firm commitment is no longer firm or treatment of the derivative as a hedge is no longer appropriate or intended.

When hedge accounting is discontinued, subsequent changes in fair value of the derivative are recorded as non-interest income. When a fair value hedge is discontinued, the hedged asset or liability is no longer adjusted for changes in fair value and the existing basis adjustment is amortized or accreted over the remaining life of the asset or liability. When a cash flow hedge is

discontinued but the hedged cash flows or forecasted transactions are still expected to occur, gains or losses that are accumulated in other comprehensive income are amortized into earnings over the same periods which the hedged transactions will affect earnings.

The Company has entered into interest rate cap derivatives to assist with interest rate risk management. These derivatives are not designated as hedging instruments but rather as stand-alone derivatives. The fair values of stand-alone derivatives are included in

other assets and other liabilities. Changes in fair value of stand-alone derivatives are recorded through earnings as non-interest income.

Income Taxes: Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position will be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is more likely than not to be realized on examination.

The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. There were 0 such interest or penalties incurred in 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ or ~~2018.~~2019.

Earnings Per Common Share: Net income, less dividends and discount accretion on preferred stock, equals net income allocable to common stockholders. Basic earnings per common share is net income allocable to common stockholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares and vested restricted stock units outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share include the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares of unexercised stock options, ~~and~~ unvested restricted stock ~~units.~~units, and pending employee stock purchase plan shares at period end.

Share-Based Payments: The Company has share-based payments which are described more fully in a subsequent note. Compensation expense associated with the stock option plan is based on the fair value of the options at the grant date. This compensation is expensed over the periods during which the options vest. Options vest based on the passage of time or the achievement of performance targets, depending on the structure of the related grant.

Compensation expense associated with restricted stock units is based on the fair value of the units at the grant date. This compensation expense is recognized ratably over the service period stipulated in the grant agreement.

Comprehensive Income: Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income includes unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale and the amortization of unrealized gains and losses on securities transferred to held-to-maturity from available-for-sale.

Loss Contingencies: Loss contingencies, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, are recorded as liabilities when the likelihood of loss is probable and an amount or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. Additional discussion of loss contingencies at December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, is presented in a subsequent note.

Restrictions on Cash: Cash on hand or on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank was required to meet regulatory reserve and clearing requirements.

Dividend Restriction: Banking regulations require maintaining certain capital levels, positive undivided profits and a certain level of net income available to shareholders and may limit the dividends paid by the wholly-owned subsidiaries to the holding company or by the holding company to stockholders.

Fair Value: Fair values of financial instruments, impaired loans, other real estate owned and property held for sale are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions, as more fully disclosed in a separate note. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments, collateral values and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could materially affect the estimates.

Segment Information: As a community-oriented financial institution, substantially all of the Company’s operations involve the delivery of loan and deposit products to customers. Management makes operating decisions and assesses performance based on an ongoing review of these banking operations, which constitute the Company’s only operating segment for financial reporting purposes.

Reclassifications: Some items in the prior year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Management determined the items reclassified are immaterial to the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and did not result in a change in equity or net income for years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018.~~2019.

~~In February 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-02,~~ ~~Leases,~~ with the intention of improving financial reporting about leasing transactions. The ASU requires all lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet. Lessor accounting is largely unchanged by the ASU, however disclosures about the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases are

required of both lessees and lessors. Lessees and lessors are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach provides for optional practical expedients when applying the ASU to leases that commenced before the effective date of the ASU. This accounting pronouncement was further modified in July 2018 with the issuance of ASU 2018-11, ~~Leases – Targeted Improvements~~, to allow for another transition method by applying a cumulative-effect adjustment to opening retained earnings at adoption and providing lessors a practical expedient to not separate non-lease and lease components in certain circumstances. The Company adopted this accounting standard effective January 1, 2019, resulting in the Company recording $3,251 in right of use assets and $3,251 of operating lease liabilities. In addition, the Company elected the following practical expedients to all leases that commenced prior to January 1, 2019: (1) No reassessment of lease populations as long as the contract was properly scoped as a lease or not a lease under ASC 840; (2) No reassessment of existing lease classification; and (3) No adjustment of existing costs.

In June 2016, ~~FASB~~the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, which ~~will change~~changed how the Company measures credit losses for most of its financial assets. This guidance is applicable to loans held for investment, off-balance-sheet credit exposures, such as loan commitments and standby letters of credit, and held-to-maturity investment securities. The Company is required to use a new forward-looking current expected credit losses (CECL) model that ~~is anticipated to~~will result in the earlier recognition of allowances for credit losses. For available-for-sale securities with unrealized losses, the Company will measure credit losses in a manner similar to current practice but will recognize those credit losses as allowances rather than reductions in the amortized cost of the securities. In addition, the ASU requires significantly more disclosure including information about credit quality by year of origination for most loans. Generally, the amendments will be applied through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. The Company has completed the process of developing credit models but is finalizing model implementation, implementation of internal controls, financial reporting process and corporate governance processes to comply with the new guidance. The ASU was originally effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2020; however, the CARES Act, issued in 2020, provided temporary relief related to the implementation of this accounting guidance until the earlier of the date on which the national emergency concerning the COVID-19 virus terminates or December 31, 2020. The Company elected to utilize this relief and has calculated the allowance for loan losses and the resulting provision for loan losses using the prior incurred loss method atthrough December 31, 2020. Further implementation relief for this standard was provided on December 27, 2020, by section 540 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act (“CAA”) which allowed for an additional extension to the earlier of 60 days after the national emergency termination date or January 1, 2022. The Company has elected not to extend the implementation any further and ~~will adopt~~has adopted effective January 1, 2021. The adoption of CECL ~~will result~~resulted in an increase to our total allowance for credit losses ~~(ACL)~~(“ACL”) on loans held for investment ~~and will require~~of $15,732, an increase in allowance for credit losses on unfunded loan commitments of $838, a reclassification of purchased credit-impaired discount from loans to the ~~allowance for credit losses.~~ACL of $10,438, an increase in deferred tax asset of $4,167 and a decrease in retained earnings of $12,403. The ~~expected~~ increase in the ACL is largely attributable to moving to a life of loan allowance methodology and the transition of certain purchase discounts from ~~additional qualitative adjustments~~an adjustment to ~~historical loss rates brought about~~amortized cost into the anticipated impacts of the COVID-19 virus. The ultimate impact to the Company’s financial condition and results of operations of the ASU, at both adoption and each subsequent reporting periods, is highly dependent on credit quality, macroeconomic forecasts and conditions, the composition of our loan portfolio and other management judgements. The Company expects the allowance for credit losses to increase by a material amount with the first quarter 2021 adoption of this accounting standard but have yet concluded on a precise estimate.ACL.

In January 2017, FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, which will simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill. Goodwill and other intangibles must be assessed for impairment annually. If an entity’s assessment determines that the fair value of an entity is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill, currently, the measurement of goodwill impairment requires that the entity’s identifiable net assets be valued following procedures similar to determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Under ASU 2017-04, goodwill impairment is measured to the extent that the carrying amount of an entity exceeds its fair value. The amendments in this update were effective for the Company’s annual goodwill impairment tests beginning in 2020. The impact of this new accounting guidance is highly dependent on changes in financial markets and future events. The Company will monitor indicators of goodwill impairment on a quarterly basis and will record impairment when it is determined to have occurred.

In March 2017, FASB issued ASU 2017-08, Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities. This update shortens the amortization period of certain callable debt securities held at a premium to the earliest call date. The amendments in this update are effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within that fiscal year, however, early adoption is permitted. If early adoption of this update is elected by the Company, any adjustments will be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year. The amendments will be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption and the Company will be required to provide change in accounting principle disclosures. The Company adopted this accounting standard effective January 1, 2019, which resulted in the Company recording a $1,385 reduction in the amortized cost of investment securities and a reduction of $1,148 in retained earnings, net of $237 in deferred taxes.

In August ~~2017, FASB issued ASU 2017-12,~~ ~~Derivatives and Hedging, Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, with the stated objective of improving the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better reflect the economics of~~

hedging transactions and to simplify the application of hedge accounting. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Potential effects on the Company’s current hedging activities include eliminating the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness, providing additional flexibility for measuring the change in fair value of the hedged item in fair value hedges of interest rate risk and easing certain hedge documentation and assessment requirements. The adoption of this accounting standard did not materially impact the Company’s financial statements but will result in changes to financial statement disclosures and changes to existing and future swap documentation.

~~In August~~ 2018, FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements by requiring that Level 3 fair value disclosures include the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop those fair value measurements. For certain unobservable inputs, an entity may disclose other quantitative information in lieu of the weighted average if the entity determines that other quantitative information would be a more reasonable and rational method to reflect the distribution of unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2018-13 was effective for the Company on January 1, 2020, and did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statement disclosures.

~~In August 2018, FASB issued ASU 2018-15,~~ ~~Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software, Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract.~~ This update requires implementation costs of hosting arrangements that are considered a service contract to be capitalized. The Company adopted this accounting standard effective October 1, 2018 and resulted in the Company capitalizing $311 of implementation costs during 2018.

In March 2020, various regulatory agencies, including the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, (“the agencies”) issued an interagency statement on loan modifications and reporting for financial institutions working with customers affected by the Coronavirus. The interagency statement was effective immediately and impacted accounting for loan modifications. This interagency statement was later revised in April 2020 to clarify the interaction between the original interagency statement and section 4013 of the CARES Act, as well as the agencies’ views on consumer protection considerations. Under Accounting Standards Codification 310-40, Receivables – Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors, (“ASC 310-40”), a restructuring of debt constitutes a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) if the creditor, for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. The agencies confirmed with the staff of the FASB that short-term

modifications made on a good faith basis in response to COVID-19 to borrowers who were current prior to any relief, are not to be considered TDRs. This includes short-term ~~(e.g., six months)~~ modifications such as payment deferrals, fee waivers, extensions of repayment terms or other delays in payment that are insignificant. Borrowers considered current are those that are less than 30 days past due on their contractual payments at the time a modification program is implemented. The CARES Act provisions were further extended to the earlier of 60 days after the national emergency termination date or January 1, 2022, by section 541 of the CAA. In addition, loan deferrals can be qualified under section 4013 of the CARES Act during the extended relief period if certain criteria are met. This interagency guidance and CARES Act provisions ~~are expected to~~ have had a material impact on the Company’s financial ~~statements.~~statements as reflected in Note 4.

In March 2020, FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. ASU 2020-04 provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The transactions primarily include contract modifications; hedging relationships; and sale or transfer of debt securities classified as held-to-maturity. The guidance was effective immediately for the Company and the amendments may be applied prospectively through December 31, 2022. The Company’s contracts issued prior to December 31, 2021, are primarily LIBOR tenures that will continue to be published until June 30, 2023, and the Company has reviewed the respective fall back language of these contract and believe that the language is inoperational. The Company will continually evaluate these contracts until the ~~process of evaluating~~index is no longer published; however, the ~~guidance, and its effect~~financial impact on ~~the Company’s~~our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ~~has not yet been determined.~~will depend on the population of contracts that are still outstanding on the date the underlying indexes are no longer published.

In October 2020, FASB issued ASU 2020-08, Codification Improvements to Subtopic 310-20, Receivables-Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs. ASU 2020-08 clarifies that the Company should reevaluate whether a callable debt security is within the scope of the guidance of premium amortization of purchased callable debt securities, at each reporting date. If there is no remaining premium or if there are no further call dates, the Company shall reset the effective yield using the payment terms of the debt security. ASU 2020-08 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020 and early application is not permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2020-08 on January 1, 2021, and the guidance isdid not ~~expected to~~ have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2021, FASB issued ASU 2021-01, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848). ASU 2021-01 ~~clarify~~clarifies that certain optional expedients and exceptions that are noted in Topic 848 apply to derivatives that are affected by the discounting transition. Certain provisions, if elected by the Company, apply to derivative instruments that use an interest rate for managing, discounting or contract price alignment that is modified as a result of reference rate reform. The guidance was effective immediately for the Company and the amendments may be applied prospectively through December 31, 2022. The Company’s contracts issued prior to December 31, 2021, are primarily LIBOR tenures that will continue to be published until June 30, 2023, and the Company has reviewed the respective fallback language of these contract and believe that the language is inoperational. The Company will continually evaluate these contracts until the ~~process of evaluating~~index is no longer published; however, the ~~guidance, and its effect~~financial impact on ~~the Company’s~~our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ~~has not yet been determined.~~will depend on the population of contracts that are still outstanding on the date the underlying indexes are no longer published.

At close of business on October 1, 2021, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common shares of American State Bancshares, Inc. (“ASBI”), based in Wichita, Kansas. Results of operations of American State Bank (“American State”) were included in the Company’s results of operations beginning October 4, 2021. Acquisition-related costs associated with this acquisition were $8,663 ($6,699 on an after-tax basis) and are included in merger expense in the Company’s income statement for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Information necessary to recognize the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is complete except for certain matters related to loans and taxes. The cash consideration exchanged exceeded the recognized amounts of the identifiable net assets acquired, resulting in goodwill of $22,198. The acquisition was an expansion to the Company’s current footprint in Kansas with the addition of 5 branch locations in the Wichita area, 2 in Southwest Kansas, 5 in Central Kansas and 5 in North Central Kansas.

The following table summarizes the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed recognized at the acquisition date.

The following table reconciles the par value of ASBI’s loan portfolio as of the purchase date to the fair value indicated in the table above. For non-purchase credit deteriorated assets, the entire fair value adjustment including both interest and credit related components is recorded as an adjustment to par (“Non-Credit Rate Marks”) and reflected as an adjustment to the carrying value of that asset within the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Following purchase, an ACL is also established for these non-purchase credit deteriorated assets which is not reflected in this table as it is accounted for outside of the business combination. For purchase-credit deteriorated assets, as required by CECL, the fair value mark is divided between an adjustment to par (“Non-Credit Rate Marks”) and an addition to the ACL (“Credit Marks in ACL”). The addition to ACL is based on the application of management’s CECL methodology to the individual loans.

On December 3, 2021, the Company acquired the assets and assumed the deposits and certain other liabilities of 3 bank locations in St. Joseph, Missouri, from Security Bank of Kansas City, based in Kansas City, Kansas (“Security”). Results of operations of these new branches were included in the Company’s results of operations beginning December 6, 2021. Acquisition-related costs associated with this acquisition were $289 ($217 on an after-tax basis) and are included in merger expenses in the Company’s income statement for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Information necessary to recognize the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is complete except for certain matters related to loans and taxes. The recognized amounts of the identifiable net assets acquired, exceeded the cash consideration exchanged resulting in goodwill of $666. The acquisition was an expansion to the Company’s current footprint in Missouri with the addition of 3 branch locations in St. Joseph, Missouri.

The following table summarizes the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed recognized at the acquisition date.

The fair value of consideration exchanged exceeded the recognized amounts of the identifiable net assets and resulted in goodwill of $666. Goodwill resulted from a combination of expected synergies including expansion in western Missouri with an additional 3 bank locations and growth opportunities.

The following table presents the carrying value of the loans acquired in the Security acquisition by class, as of the date of acquisition. There were no purchase accounting marks, either rate or credit related, recognized on these assets.

Assuming that the ASBI and Security acquisitions would have taken place on January 1, 2020, total combined revenue would have been $170,638 for year ended December 31, 2021 and $180,224 for year ended December 31, 2020. Net income would have been $64,252 at December 31, 2021, and net loss would have been $69,531 at December 31, 2020. The pro forma amounts disclosed exclude merger expense from non-interest expense, which is considered a non-recurring adjustment. Separate revenue and earnings of the former ASBI locations are not available subsequent to the acquisition.

At the close of business on October 23, 2020, the Company acquired the assets and assumed the deposit liabilities of Almena State Bank (“Almena”), based in Norton, Kansas, pursuant to a Purchase and Assumption Agreement facilitated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). Results of Almena operations were included in the Company’s results of operations beginning October 24, 2020. Acquisition-related costs associated with this acquisition were $299 ($225 on an after-tax basis) and are included in merger expense in the Company’s income statement for the year ended December 31, 2020. Additional acquisition-related costs for this acquisition were recognized in 2021 of $237 ($177 on an after-tax basis) and are included in merger expense in the Company’s income statement for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Information necessary to recognize the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is complete except for certain matters related to loan valuation, which is partially due to a limited due diligence period related to the FDIC acquisition. The recognized amounts of the identifiable net assets acquired, exceeded the cash consideration exchanged resulting in a gain on acquisition of $2,145. The acquisition was an expansion to the Company’s current footprint in western Kansas with the addition of 1 branch location in Norton, Kansas, and 1 in Almena, Kansas.

The following table summarizes the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed recognized at the acquisition date.

Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
Cash and due from banks	$	25,925		$	25,925
Available-for-sale securities		7,041			7,041
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock		187			187
Loans		31,407			35,155
Premises and equipment		1,109			1,109
Other real estate owned		636			636
Other assets		604			604
Total assets acquired		66,909			70,657
Deposits		62,472			62,472
Federal funds purchased and retail repurchase agreements		251			251
Interest payable and other liabilities		2,041			5,204
Total liabilities assumed		64,764			67,927
Total identifiable net assets		2,145			2,730
Gain on acquisition		(2,145	)		(2,730	)
	$	—		$	—

The fair value of net assets acquired includes fair value adjustments to certain loans that were not considered impaired as of the acquisition date. The fair value adjustments were determined using discounted contractual cash flows. However, the Company believes that all contractual cash flows related to these financial instruments will be collected. As such, these loans were not considered impaired at the acquisition date and were not subject to the guidance relating to purchased credit impaired loans, which have shown evidence of credit deterioration since origination.

The following table presents the best available information about the loans acquired in the Almena acquisition as of the date of acquisition.

	Non-Credit Impaired			Purchased Credit Impaired			Non-Credit Impaired			Purchased Credit Impaired
Contractually required principal	$	25,702		$	20,597		$	25,702		$	20,597
Non-accretable difference (expected losses)		—			(14,637	)		—			(10,889	)
Cash flows expected to be collected		25,702			5,960			25,702			9,708
Accretable yield		(255	)		—			(255	)		—
Fair value of acquired loans	$	25,447		$	5,960		$	25,447		$	9,708

The following table presents the carrying value of the loans acquired in the Almena acquisition by class, as of the date of acquisition.

	Non-Credit Impaired		Purchased Credit Impaired		Total		Non-Credit Impaired		Purchased Credit Impaired		Total
Commercial real estate	$	3,895	$	1,596	$	5,491	$	3,895	$	2,298	$	6,193
Commercial and industrial		5,848		292		6,140		5,848		2,028		7,876
Residential real estate		3,157		182		3,339		3,157		173		3,330
Agricultural real estate		3,226		896		4,122		3,226		2,172		5,398
Consumer		1,769		—		1,769		1,769		—		1,769
Agricultural		7,552		2,994		10,546		7,552		3,037		10,589
Fair value of acquired loans	$	25,447	$	5,960	$	31,407	$	25,447	$	9,708	$	35,155

Assuming that the Almena acquisition would have taken place on January 1, 2019, total combined revenue would have been $183,625 for year ended December 31, 2020, and $203,002 for year ended December 31, 2019. Net loss would have been $74,078 at December 31, 2020, and net income would have been $26,855 at December 31, 2019. The pro forma amounts disclosed exclude merger expense from non-interest expense, which is considered a non-recurring adjustment. Separate revenue and earnings of the former Almena locations are not available subsequent to the acquisition.

On February 8, 2019, the Company acquired the assets and assumed the deposits and certain other liabilities of 2 bank locations in Guymon, Oklahoma, and 1 bank location in Cordell, Oklahoma, from MidFirst Bank, based in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (“MidFirst”). Results of operations of these new banks were included in the Company’s results of operations beginning February 9, 2019. Acquisition-related costs associated with this acquisition were $902 ($684 on an after-tax basis) and are included in merger expenses in the Company’s income statement for the year ended December 31, 2019.

The fair value of consideration exchanged exceeded the recognized amounts of the identifiable net assets and resulted in goodwill of $4,720. Goodwill resulted from a combination of expected synergies including expansion in western Oklahoma with an additional 3 bank locations and growth opportunities.

~~The following table summarizes the consideration paid for the MidFirst assets acquired and liabilities assumed recognized at the merger date.~~

The fair value of net assets acquired includes fair value adjustments to certain loans that were not considered purchased credit impaired as of the merger date. The fair value adjustments were determined using discounted contractual cash flows. However, the Company believes that all contractual cash flows related to these financial instruments will be collected. As such, these loans were not considered impaired at the merger date and were not subject to the guidance relating to purchased credit impaired loans, which have shown evidence of credit deterioration since origination. Cash flows associated with purchased credit impaired loans are not considered reasonably predictable and as such these loans are considered nonaccrual.

~~The following table presents the best available information about the loans acquired in the MidFirst acquisition as of the date of acquisition.~~

~~The following table presents the carrying value of the loans acquired in the MidFirst acquisition by class, as of the date of acquisition.~~

Assuming that the MidFirst acquisition would have taken place on January 1, 2018, total combined revenue would have been $200,807 for year ended December 31, 2019, and $183,022 for year ended December 31, 2018. Net income would have been $25,216 and $33,856 at December 31, 2019 and 2018. The pro forma amounts disclosed exclude merger expense from non-interest expense, which is considered a material non-recurring adjustment. Separate revenue and earnings of the former MidFirst locations are not available subsequent to the acquisition.

The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale securities and the related gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income were as follows.

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Allowance for Credit Losses		Fair Value
December 31, 2020
December 31, 2021
Available-for-sale securities
U.S. Government-sponsored entities	$	996	$	27	$	—		$	1,023	$	124,898	$	13	$	(1,504	)	$	—	$	123,407
U.S. Treasury securities		4,024		1	—				4,025		157,289	—			(1,687	)	—			155,602
Mortgage-backed securities
Government-sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities		630,485		21,049		(109	)		651,425		661,584		10,215		(6,912	)	—			664,887
Private label residential mortgage-backed securities		44,302		5		(129	)		44,178		173,717	—			(2,029	)	—			171,688
Corporate		52,503		1,153		(6	)		53,650		52,555		1,437		(215	)	—			53,777
Small Business Administration loan pools		1,226		44	—				1,270		16,568		13		(106	)	—			16,475
State and political subdivisions		111,865		4,391	—				116,256		138,404		3,618		(416	)	—			141,606
	$	845,401	$	26,670	$	(244	)	$	871,827	$	1,325,015	$	15,296	$	(12,869	)	$	—	$	1,327,442
December 31, 2019
Available-for-sale securities
Mortgage-backed securities
Government-sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities	$	141,082	$	1,261	$	(276	)	$	142,067
	$	141,082	$	1,261	$	(276	)	$	142,067

~~The amortized cost and fair value of held-to-maturity securities and the related gross unrecognized gains and losses were as follows.~~

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrecognized Gains		Gross Unrecognized Losses			Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
December 31, 2019
Held-to-maturity securities
December 31, 2020
Available-for-sale securities
U.S. Government-sponsored entities	$	1,991	$	23	$	(1	)	$	2,013	$	996	$	27	$	—		$	1,023
U.S. Treasury securities											4,024		1	—				4,025
Mortgage-backed securities
Government-sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities		593,236		11,272		(536	)		603,972		630,485		21,049		(109	)		651,425
Private label residential mortgage-backed securities											44,302		5		(129	)		44,178
Corporate		22,992		503	—				23,495		52,503		1,153		(6	)		53,650
Small Business Administration loan pools		1,478		12	—				1,490		1,226		44	—				1,270
State and political subdivisions		149,362		3,604		(25	)		152,941		111,865		4,391	—				116,256
	$	769,059	$	15,414	$	(562	)	$	783,911	$	845,401	$	26,670	$	(244	)	$	871,827

The tables above present unrecognized losses on held-to-maturity securities since date of designation. On September 1, 2020, all held-to-maturity securities, totaling $612.3 million, were moved to available-for-sale to better manage the Company’s assets and liabilities and to facilitate opportunities to take advantage of changes in the yield curve or other market factors.

The fair value and amortized cost of debt securities at December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, by contractual maturity, is shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Securities not due at a single maturity date, primarily mortgage-backed securities, are shown separately.

	Available-for-Sale				Available-for-Sale
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Within one year	$	12,791	$	12,840	$	8,192	$	8,260
One to five years		26,916		27,702		98,660		98,570
Five to ten years		70,459		72,812		301,043		300,490
After ten years		60,448		62,870		81,819		83,547
Mortgage-backed securities		674,787		695,603		835,301		836,575
Total debt securities	$	845,401	$	871,827	$	1,325,015	$	1,327,442

The carrying value of securities pledged as collateral, to secure public deposits and for other purposes, was approximately $892,182 at December 31, 2021, and $713,001 at December 31, ~~2020 and $780,038 at December 31, 2019.~~2020. At year-end ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, there were 0 holdings of securities of any one issuer, other than the U.S. Government and its agencies, in an amount greater than 10% of stockholders’ equity.

The following tables show gross unrealized losses and fair value aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019.~~2020.

	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total					Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
December 31, 2021
Available-for-sale securities
Mortgage-backed securities
Government-sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities																$	378,057	$	(6,860	)	$	2,868	$	(52	)	$	380,925	$	(6,912	)
Private label residential mortgage-backed securities																	159,381		(1,978	)		2,208		(51	)		161,589		(2,029	)
U.S. Government-sponsored entities																	117,618		(1,504	)		—		—			117,618		(1,504	)
U.S. Treasury securities																	155,601		(1,687	)		—		—			155,601		(1,687	)
Corporate																	4,785		(215	)		—		—			4,785		(215	)
Small Business Administration loan pools																	15,459		(106	)		—		—			15,459		(106	)
State and political subdivisions																	28,443		(416	)		—		—			28,443		(416	)
Total temporarily impaired securities																$	859,344	$	(12,766	)	$	5,076	$	(103	)	$	864,420	$	(12,869	)
December 31, 2020
Available-for-sale securities
Mortgage-backed securities
Government-sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities	$	28,770	$	(109	)	$	—	$	—		$	28,770	$	(109	)	$	28,770	$	(109	)	$	—	$	—		$	28,770	$	(109	)
Private label residential mortgage-backed securities		28,367		(129	)		—		—			28,367		(129	)		28,367		(129	)		—		—			28,367		(129	)
Corporate		3,908		(6	)		—		—			3,908		(6	)		3,908		(6	)		—		—			3,908		(6	)
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	61,045	$	(244	)	$	—	$	—		$	61,045	$	(244	)	$	61,045	$	(244	)	$	—	$	—		$	61,045	$	(244	)
December 31, 2019
Available-for-sale securities
Mortgage-backed securities
Government-sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities	$	2,017	$	(3	)	$	32,466	$	(273	)	$	34,483	$	(276	)
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	2,017	$	(3	)	$	32,466	$	(273	)	$	34,483	$	(276	)

As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the Company held 18166 available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position. The tables above present unrealized losses on held-to-maturity securities since the date of their purchase, independent of the impact associated with changes in cost basis upon transfer from the available-for-sale designation to the held-to-maturity designation.

Unrealized losses on securities have not been recognized into income because the security issuers are of high credit quality, management does not intend to sell and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell the securities prior to their anticipated recovery, and the decline in fair value is largely due to changes in interest rates. The fair value is expected to recover as the securities approach maturity.

~~There were 0~~The proceeds from sales orand the associated gains and losses on available-for-sale securities reclassified from other comprehensive income to income ~~during 2020, 2019 or 2018.~~are listed below.

Commercial real estate mortgage loans: Owner occupied commercial real estate mortgage loans are secured by commercial office buildings, industrial buildings, warehouses or retail buildings where the owner of the building occupies the property. For such loans, repayment is largely dependent upon the operation of the borrower's business.

Commercial and industrial: Commercial and industrial loans include loans to business enterprises issued for commercial, industrial and/or other professional purposes. These loans are generally secured by equipment, inventory and accounts receivable of the borrower and repayment is primarily dependent on business cash flows.

Residential real estate mortgage loans: Residential real estate mortgage consists primarily of loans secured by 1-4 family residential properties, including home equity lines of credit. Repayment is primarily dependent on the personal cash flow of the borrower.

Agricultural real estate loans: Agricultural real estate loans are secured by real estate related to farmland and are affected by the value of farmland. Generally, the borrower’s ability to repay is based on the value of farmland and cash flows from farming operations.

Agricultural production loans: Agricultural production loans are primarily operating lines subject to annual farming revenues, including productivity and yield of farm products and market pricing at the time of sale.

Consumer: Consumer loans include all loans issued to individuals not included in the categories above. Examples of consumer and other loans are automobile loans, consumer credit cards and loans to finance education, among others. Many consumer loans are unsecured. Repayment is primarily dependent on the personal cash flow of the borrower.

The following table lists categories of loans at December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019.~~2020.

	2020			2019			2021			2020
Commercial real estate	$	1,188,696		$	1,158,022		$	1,486,148		$	1,188,696
Commercial and industrial		734,495			592,052			567,497			734,495
Residential real estate		381,958			503,439			638,087			381,958
Agricultural real estate		133,693			141,868			198,330			133,693
Agricultural								166,975			94,322
Consumer		58,532			68,378			98,590			58,532
Agricultural		94,322			92,893
Total loans		2,591,696			2,556,652			3,155,627			2,591,696
Allowance for loan losses		(33,709	)		(12,232	)		(48,365	)		(33,709	)
Net loans	$	2,557,987		$	2,544,420		$	3,107,262		$	2,557,987

Included in the commercial and industrial loan balances at December 31, 2021 and 2020, are $44,783 and $253,741 of loans that were originated under the SBA PPP program. At December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, unamortized loan fees were $2.3 million and $7.0 million.

During 2021, the Company purchased 6 pools of residential real estate loans totaling $363,892. During 2020, the Company purchased 1 pool of residential real estate loans totaling $752. As of December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, residential real estate loans include ~~$86,093~~$372,069 and ~~$144,554~~$86,093 of purchased residential real estate loans.

The unamortized discount of merger purchase accounting adjustments related to non-purchase credit deteriorated loans included in the loan totals above are $6,649 with related loans of $527,422 at December 31, 2021. At December 31, 2020, excluding purchased credit deteriorated loans, there were $380,058 of loans with a related discount of $5,510 that were purchased as part of a merger. Effective January 1, 2021, with the adoption of CECL, amortizable non-credit discounts on purchase credit impaired loans are included in unamortized discount of merger purchase accounting adjustments.

Overdraft deposit accounts are reclassified and included in consumer loans above. These accounts totaled ~~$597~~$886 and ~~$815~~$597 at December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019.~~2020.

The Company adopted ASU 2016-13, also referred to as CECL, effective January 1, 2021, and with that adoption the Company’s method for estimating the allowance for credit losses has changed. The Company estimates the allowance for credit losses under CECL using relevant available information, from internal and external sources, relating to past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Internal historical loss experience provides the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses. Adjustments to historical loss information are made for differences in current loan-specific risk characteristics such as differences in underwriting standards, portfolio mix, delinquency levels or loan terms, as well as, for changes in environmental conditions, such as

changes in unemployment rates, property values, consumer price index, gross domestic product, housing starts or relevant index, U.S. personal income, U.S. housing price indices, federal funds target and various U.S. Government interest rates.

The allowance for credit losses is measured on a collective (pool) basis when similar risk characteristics exist. The Company has identified commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, residential real estate, agricultural real estate, agricultural production and consumer as portfolio segments and measures the allowance for credit losses using a historical loss rate method for each segment to estimate credit losses on a collective basis. The Company’s CECL calculation utilizes historical loss rates, average default month, average prepayment rates and exposure at default as assumptions to calculate an unadjusted historical loss estimate for the contractual term of the loans adjusted for prepayment. The historical loss estimate is then adjusted for the anticipated changes in the Company’s historical loss rate using a regression analysis and current economic variables over the next 12 months. The Company has selected 12 months as its reasonable and supportable forecast period and has selected an immediate reversion back to unadjusted historical loss rates for periods beyond the reasonable and supportable forecast period. The calculated historical loss estimate and the economic qualitative adjustment are further evaluated for change via a management qualitative adjustment factor. Management qualitative adjustments typically are anticipated changes in loss trends that are not reflected in the historical data to be used in forecasting.

The Company evaluates all loans that do not share risk characteristics on an individual basis for estimating the allowance for credit loss. Loans evaluated on an individual basis are not included in the collective basis. The Company currently reviews all loans that are classified as non-accrual on an individual basis. The Company typically elects the collateral-dependent practical expedient on all individual impairment assessments and expected credit losses are based on the fair value of the collateral at the reporting date adjusted for selling costs as appropriate.

The Company’s ACL is highly dependent on credit quality, macroeconomic forecasts and conditions, the composition of our loan portfolio and other management judgements. The current management adjustment represents a significant portion of the Company’s ACL and is comprised of the estimated impact to ACL from the COVID-19 pandemic and associated response.

During 2021, the Company updated the purchase accounting conclusions related to PCD assets acquired through the Almena transaction and the adjustment is reflected in the table below within “Adjustment to impact of adopting ASC 326 – PCD loans.” During the year, additional information was obtained and additional analysis was performed by the management team which led to a modification of purchase date accounting. The adjustment resulted in a reduction in the allowance for credit losses which was offset by an increase in loan repurchase obligation, which is reported in interest payable and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets, decrease in deferred tax asset and an increase in gain on acquisition.

The following tables present the activity in the allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses by class for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018.~~2019.

December 31, 2019	Commercial Real Estate			Commercial and Industrial			Residential Real Estate			Agricultural Real Estate			Consumer			Agricultural			Total
December 31, 2020																						Commercial Real Estate			Commercial and Industrial			Residential Real Estate			Agricultural Real Estate			Agricultural			Consumer			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	4,662		$	2,707		$	2,320		$	391		$	1,070		$	304		$	11,454		$	3,919		$	3,061		$	2,676		$	608		$	546		$	1,422		$	12,232
Provision for loan losses		1,310			14,193			941			213			1,387			310			18,354
Provision for credit losses																							5,312			10,643			2,284			469			215			5,332			24,255
Loans charged-off		(2,178	)		(13,911	)		(1,077	)		(43	)		(1,394	)		(87	)		(18,690	)		(421	)		(1,304	)		(446	)		(191	)		(11	)		(949	)		(3,322	)
Recoveries		125			72			492			47			359			19			1,114			202			56			45			18			8			215			544
Total ending allowance balance	$	3,919		$	3,061		$	2,676		$	608		$	1,422		$	546		$	12,232		$	9,012		$	12,456		$	4,559		$	904		$	758		$	6,020		$	33,709

December 31, 2018	Commercial Real Estate			Commercial and Industrial			Residential Real Estate			Agricultural Real Estate			Consumer			Agricultural			Total
December 31, 2019																						Commercial Real Estate			Commercial and Industrial			Residential Real Estate			Agricultural Real Estate			Agricultural			Consumer			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	2,740		$	2,136		$	2,262		$	319		$	768		$	273		$	8,498		$	4,662		$	2,707		$	2,320		$	391		$	304		$	1,070		$	11,454
Provision for loan losses		1,832			636			97			146			1,188			62			3,961
Provision for credit losses																							1,310			14,193			941			213			310			1,387			18,354
Loans charged-off		(1,779	)		(118	)		(293	)		(93	)		(1,431	)		(43	)		(3,757	)		(2,178	)		(13,911	)		(1,077	)		(43	)		(87	)		(1,394	)		(18,690	)
Recoveries		1,869			53			254			19			545			12			2,752			125			72			492			47			19			359			1,114
Total ending allowance balance	$	4,662		$	2,707		$	2,320		$	391		$	1,070		$	304		$	11,454		$	3,919		$	3,061		$	2,676		$	608		$	546		$	1,422		$	12,232

The following tables present the recorded investment in loans and the balance in the allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses by portfolio and class based on impairment method as of December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019.~~2020.

December 31, 2020	Commercial Real Estate		Commercial and Industrial		Residential Real Estate		Agricultural Real Estate		Consumer		Agricultural		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
December 31, 2021															Commercial Real Estate		Commercial and Industrial		Residential Real Estate		Agricultural Real Estate		Agricultural		Consumer		Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,159	$	5,457	$	485	$	595	$	68	$	96	$	8,860	$	4,381	$	3,650	$	892	$	1,488	$	3,546	$	75	$	14,032
Collectively evaluated for impairment		6,472		5,985		3,949		266		5,952		586		23,210		18,097		8,598		4,668		747		210		2,013		34,333
Purchased credit impaired loans		381		1,014		125		43		—		76		1,639
Total	$	9,012	$	12,456	$	4,559	$	904	$	6,020	$	758	$	33,709	$	22,478	$	12,248	$	5,560	$	2,235	$	3,756	$	2,088	$	48,365
Loan Balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	4,752	$	20,421	$	1,939	$	2,711	$	272	$	2,201	$	32,296	$	45,421	$	13,786	$	5,362	$	14,959	$	13,049	$	357	$	92,934
Collectively evaluated for impairment		1,176,403		710,038		377,331		126,256		58,242		87,158		2,535,428		1,440,727		553,711		632,725		183,371		153,926		98,233		3,062,693
Purchased credit impaired loans		7,541		4,036		2,688		4,726		18		4,963		23,972
Total	$	1,188,696	$	734,495	$	381,958	$	133,693	$	58,532	$	94,322	$	2,591,696	$	1,486,148	$	567,497	$	638,087	$	198,330	$	166,975	$	98,590	$	3,155,627

December 31, 2019	Commercial Real Estate		Commercial and Industrial		Residential Real Estate		Agricultural Real Estate		Consumer		Agricultural		Total
December 31, 2020															Commercial Real Estate		Commercial and Industrial		Residential Real Estate		Agricultural Real Estate		Agricultural		Consumer		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	281	$	199	$	303	$	56	$	39	$	57	$	935	$	2,159	$	5,457	$	485	$	595	$	96	$	68	$	8,860
Collectively evaluated for impairment		3,581		2,848		2,352		459		1,383		394		11,017		6,472		5,985		3,949		266		586		5,952		23,210
Purchased credit impaired loans		57		14		21		93	—			95		280		381		1,014		125		43		76		—		1,639
Total	$	3,919	$	3,061	$	2,676	$	608	$	1,422	$	546	$	12,232	$	9,012	$	12,456	$	4,559	$	904	$	758	$	6,020	$	33,709
Loan Balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	4,375	$	16,335	$	7,358	$	584	$	381	$	518	$	29,551	$	4,752	$	20,421	$	1,939	$	2,711	$	2,201	$	272	$	32,296
Collectively evaluated for impairment		1,145,701		570,606		493,309		135,776		67,972		90,347		2,503,711		1,176,403		710,038		377,331		126,256		87,158		58,242		2,535,428
Purchased credit impaired loans		7,946		5,111		2,772		5,508		25		2,028		23,390		7,541		4,036		2,688		4,726		4,963		18		23,972
Total	$	1,158,022	$	592,052	$	503,439	$	141,868	$	68,378	$	92,893	$	2,556,652	$	1,188,696	$	734,495	$	381,958	$	133,693	$	94,322	$	58,532	$	2,591,696

Excluding purchased credit impaired loans, included in the above tables is $380,058, $624,747 and $827,676 of loans purchased at a discount acquired as part of a merger and the discount associated with these loans is $5,510, $8,287 and $11,372 at December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.

The following table presents information related to ~~impaired~~nonaccrual loans ~~excluding those purchased credit impaired loans which have not deteriorated since acquisition, by class of loans as of and for the year ended~~at December 31, ~~2020.~~2021.

December 31, 2020	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Allowance for Loan Losses Allocated		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
December 31, 2021											Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Allowance for Loan Losses Allocated		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate	$	6,279	$	1,683	$	—	$	782	$	36	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	336	$	3
Commercial and industrial		2,087		643		—		11,512		28		6,060		1,964		—		521		101
Residential real estate		270		180		—		3,475		17		609		429		—		126		4
Agricultural real estate		3,408		1,090		—		670		5		1,795		1,660		—		2,178		82
Agricultural												—		—		—		1,725		—
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—		49		49		—		10		2
Agricultural		11,326		4,492		—		898		—
Subtotal		23,370		8,088		—		17,337		86		8,513		4,102		—		4,896		192
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate		7,134		5,899		2,540		5,713		35		7,690		6,833		1,632		6,985		19
Commercial and industrial		29,245		22,814		6,471		12,168		362		4,976		4,593		1,800		25,881		119
Residential real estate		3,023		2,775		610		3,414		14		5,170		4,646		888		3,204		41
Agricultural real estate		3,474		3,021		638		3,432		34		3,726		2,738		637		3,224		56
Agricultural												8,836		6,175		2,307		6,028		113
Consumer		294		272		68		309		7		314		274		74		251		8
Agricultural		1,330		820		172		1,285		1
Subtotal		44,500		35,601		10,499		26,321		453		30,712		25,259		7,338		45,573		356
Total	$	67,870	$	43,689	$	10,499	$	43,658	$	539	$	39,225	$	29,361	$	7,338	$	50,469	$	548

The above table presents interest income for the twelve months ended December 31, ~~2020.~~2021. Interest income recognized in the above table was substantially recognized on the cash basis. The recorded investment in loans excludes accrued interest receivable due to immateriality.

The following table presents information related to impaired loans, excluding purchased credit impaired loans which have not deteriorated since acquisition, by portfolio and class of loans as of and for the year ended December 31, ~~2019.~~2020.

December 31, 2019	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Allowance for Loan Losses Allocated		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
December 31, 2020											Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Allowance for Loan Losses Allocated		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate	$	2,166	$	2,150	$	—	$	6,372	$	82	$	6,279	$	1,683	$	—	$	782	$	36
Commercial and industrial		20,152		14,832		—		4,617		11		2,087		643		—		11,512		28
Residential real estate		4,395		4,324		—		4,193		50		270		180		—		3,475		17
Agricultural real estate		1,610		1,533		—		1,750		—		3,408		1,090		—		670		5
Agricultural												11,326		4,492		—		898		—
Consumer		—		—		—		25		—		—		—		—		—		—
Agricultural		—		—		—		240		—
Subtotal		28,323		22,839		—		17,197		143		23,370		8,088		—		17,337		86
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate		3,469		2,749		338		6,262		74		7,134		5,899		2,540		5,713		35
Commercial and industrial		1,845		1,640		213		15,150		21		29,245		22,814		6,471		12,168		362
Residential real estate		3,395		3,244		324		6,221		59		3,023		2,775		610		3,414		14
Agricultural real estate		1,142		1,015		149		928		2		3,474		3,021		638		3,432		34
Agricultural												1,330		820		172		1,285		1
Consumer		430		381		39		694		9		294		272		68		309		7
Agricultural		1,619		1,359		152		803		2
Subtotal		11,900		10,388		1,215		30,058		167		44,500		35,601		10,499		26,321		453
Total	$	40,223	$	33,227	$	1,215	$	47,255	$	310	$	67,870	$	43,689	$	10,499	$	43,658	$	539

The above table presents interest income for the twelve months ended December 31, ~~2019.~~2020. Interest income recognized in the above table was substantially recognized on the cash basis. The recorded investment in loans excludes accrued interest receivable due to immateriality.

The following tables present the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans as of December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, by portfolio and class of loans.

December 31, 2020	30 – 59 Days Past Due		60 – 89 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Still On Accrual		Nonaccrual		Loans Not Past Due		Total
December 31, 2021													30 – 59 Days Past Due		60 – 89 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Still On Accrual		Nonaccrual		Loans Not Past Due		Total
Commercial real estate	$	1,374	$	172	$	—	$	7,582	$	1,179,568	$	1,188,696	$	4,633	$	408	$	256	$	6,833	$	1,474,018	$	1,486,148
Commercial and industrial		261		—		—		23,457		710,777		734,495		424		88		—		6,557		560,428		567,497
Residential real estate		377		4,712		—		2,955		373,914		381,958		620		1,126		—		5,075		631,266		638,087
Agricultural real estate		260		—		98		4,111		129,224		133,693		28		57		—		4,398		193,847		198,330
Agricultural														5		—		—		6,175		160,795		166,975
Consumer		336		60		45		272		57,819		58,532		316		61		—		323		97,890		98,590
Agricultural		196		—		—		5,312		88,814		94,322
Total	$	2,804	$	4,944	$	143	$	43,689	$	2,540,116	$	2,591,696	$	6,026	$	1,740	$	256	$	29,361	$	3,118,244	$	3,155,627

December 31, 2019	30 – 59 Days Past Due		60 – 89 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Still On Accrual		Nonaccrual		Loans Not Past Due		Total
December 31, 2020													30 – 59 Days Past Due		60 – 89 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Still On Accrual		Nonaccrual		Loans Not Past Due		Total
Commercial real estate	$	1,191	$	218	$	—	$	6,913	$	1,149,700	$	1,158,022	$	1,374	$	172	$	—	$	7,582	$	1,179,568	$	1,188,696
Commercial and industrial		74		11		—		16,906		575,061		592,052		261		—		—		23,457		710,777		734,495
Residential real estate		831		1,008		—		8,013		493,587		503,439		377		4,712		—		2,955		373,914		381,958
Agricultural real estate		59		78		—		4,807		136,924		141,868		260		—		98		4,111		129,224		133,693
Agricultural														196		—		—		5,312		88,814		94,322
Consumer		402		138		—		381		67,457		68,378		336		60		45		272		57,819		58,532
Agricultural		10		14		—		1,359		91,510		92,893
Total	$	2,567	$	1,467	$	—	$	38,379	$	2,514,239	$	2,556,652	$	2,804	$	4,944	$	143	$	43,689	$	2,540,116	$	2,591,696

The Company estimates expected credit losses over the contractual period in which the Company is exposed to credit risk from a contractual obligation to extend credit, unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable by the Company. The allowance for credit losses on off-balance-sheet credit exposures is adjusted as a provision for credit loss expense recognized within other non-interest expense on the consolidated statements of income and included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The estimated credit loss includes consideration of the likelihood that funding will occur and an estimate of expected credit losses on commitments expected to be funded over its estimated life. The estimate of expected credit loss is based on the historical loss rate for the class of loan the commitments would be classified as if funded.

The following table lists allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures as of December 31, 2021.

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. Consumer loans are considered unclassified credits unless downgraded due to payment status or reviewed as part of a larger credit relationship. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

Pass: Loans classified as pass include all loans that do not fall under one of the three following categories. These loans are considered unclassified.

Special Mention: Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the Company’s credit position at some future date. These loans are considered classified.

Doubtful: Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. These loans are considered classified.

Based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by type and year of organization, at December 31, 2021, is as follows.

December 31, 2021	2021		2020		2019		2018		2017		Prior		Revolving Loans Amortized Cost		Revolving Loans Converted to Term		Total
Commercial real estate
Risk rating
Pass	$	301,947	$	212,444	$	159,374	$	134,465	$	72,249	$	164,363	$	409,109	$	594	$	1,454,545
Special Mention		126		885		—		11,817		1,168		8,705		—		—		22,701
Substandard		1,687		401		145		77		828		5,764		—		—		8,902
Doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial real estate	$	303,760	$	213,730	$	159,519	$	146,359	$	74,245	$	178,832	$	409,109	$	594	$	1,486,148
Commercial and industrial
Risk rating
Pass	$	170,263	$	100,457	$	57,955	$	11,019	$	17,327	$	8,855	$	155,181	$	9,726	$	530,783
Special Mention		19		—		1,958		1,482		284		5,750		—		—		9,493
Substandard		4,200		5,410		10,238		1,417		444		43		5,469		—		27,221
Doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial and industrial	$	174,482	$	105,867	$	70,151	$	13,918	$	18,055	$	14,648	$	160,650	$	9,726	$	567,497
Residential real estate
Risk rating
Pass	$	336,775	$	24,633	$	22,520	$	60,461	$	34,453	$	102,363	$	51,584	$	184	$	632,973
Special Mention		—		—		—		—		—		25		—		—		25
Substandard		—		79		48		159		1,909		2,740		154		—		5,089
Doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total residential real estate	$	336,775	$	24,712	$	22,568	$	60,620	$	36,362	$	105,128	$	51,738	$	184	$	638,087
Agricultural real estate
Risk rating
Pass	$	38,412	$	36,667	$	18,442	$	12,142	$	14,432	$	21,792	$	42,541	$	—	$	184,428
Special Mention		682		—		—		—		40		456		32		—		1,210
Substandard		1,705		206		6,020		592		2,530		554		1,085		—		12,692
Doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total agricultural real estate	$	40,799	$	36,873	$	24,462	$	12,734	$	17,002	$	22,802	$	43,658	$	—	$	198,330
Agricultural
Risk rating
Pass	$	27,637	$	17,393	$	6,391	$	2,399	$	2,930	$	1,593	$	93,982	$	172	$	152,497
Special Mention		—		—		90		1,299		—		645		—		—		2,034
Substandard		3,456		2,112		1,414		1,651		137		1,164		2,510		—		12,444
Doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total agricultural	$	31,093	$	19,505	$	7,895	$	5,349	$	3,067	$	3,402	$	96,492	$	172	$	166,975
Consumer
Risk rating
Pass	$	40,692	$	15,171	$	7,186	$	3,640	$	2,228	$	3,551	$	25,799	$	1	$	98,268
Special Mention		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Substandard		6		154		94		15		24		29		—		—		322
Doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total consumer	$	40,698	$	15,325	$	7,280	$	3,655	$	2,252	$	3,580	$	25,799	$	1	$	98,590
Total loans
Risk rating
Pass	$	915,726	$	406,765	$	271,868	$	224,126	$	143,619	$	302,517	$	778,196	$	10,677	$	3,053,494
Special Mention		827		885		2,048		14,598		1,492		15,581		32		—		35,463
Substandard		11,054		8,362		17,959		3,911		5,872		10,294		9,218		—		66,670
Doubtful	��	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total loans	$	927,607	$	416,012	$	291,875	$	242,635	$	150,983	$	328,392	$	787,446	$	10,677	$	3,155,627

The table below shows classification status of loans by class of loans ~~is as follows as~~prior to the adoption of CECL at December 31, ~~2020 and 2019.~~2020.

December 31, 2019	Unclassified		Classified		Total
December 31, 2020							Unclassified		Classified		Total
Commercial real estate	$	1,146,696	$	11,326	$	1,158,022	$	1,171,961	$	16,735	$	1,188,696
Commercial and industrial		560,282		31,770		592,052		674,392		60,103		734,495
Residential real estate		495,418		8,021		503,439		378,868		3,090		381,958
Agricultural real estate		132,065		9,803		141,868		125,425		8,268		133,693
Agricultural								86,629		7,693		94,322
Consumer		67,997		381		68,378		58,253		279		58,532
Agricultural		88,607		4,286		92,893
Total	$	2,491,065	$	65,587	$	2,556,652	$	2,495,528	$	96,168	$	2,591,696

In keeping with regulatory guidance to work with borrowers during COVID-19, the Company executed a payment deferral program for our commercial lending clients that were adversely affected by the pandemic. Depending on the demonstrated need of the client, the Company originally deferred either the full loan payment or the principal component of the loan payment for 90 or 180 days. Loans originally deferred for 90 days may, dependent on specific qualifications, be approved for an additional 90-day deferral. In accordance with interagency guidance issued in March 2020, these short-term deferrals are not automatically considered troubled debt restructurings, are not reflected in past due loan balances and have not been reported as a classified loan solely due to a deferral. Subsequent loan deferrals were assessed for trouble debt restructuring classification in accordance with section 4013 of the CARES Act or in accordance with interagency guidance, and if certain criteria was met the deferred loan was not classified as a troubled debt restructuring. The Company has made subsequent loan deferrals that have qualified under section 4013 of the CARES Act and CAA Act, these deferred loans were not classified as trouble debt ~~restructures.~~restructurings. Deferred loans are subject to ongoing monitoring and will be downgraded or placed on nonaccrual if noted repayment weaknesses exist. At December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the Company has 2820 loans, totaling ~~$60.9~~$36.3 million, that have been granted a payment deferral, and remain on deferral, as part of our COVID-19 ~~response.~~response, compared to 28 loans, totaling $60.9 million, at December 31, 2020.

The following table lists loans included in the payment deferral program by deferment type and category at December 31, ~~2020.~~2021.

The credit risk classification of loans participating in the payment deferral program at December 31, ~~2020 follows.~~2021, follows below.

	Unclassified		Classified		Total
December 31, 2021							Unclassified		Classified		Total
Commercial real estate	$	45,628	$	—	$	45,628	$	32,855	$	—	$	32,855
Commercial and industrial		5,095		10,157		15,252		3,450	—			3,450
Total loans	$	50,723	$	10,157	$	60,880	$	36,305	$	—	$	36,305

~~The~~Prior to the adoption of CECL, the Company ~~has~~had acquired loans for which there was at acquisition, evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination and it was probable, at acquisition, that all contractually required payments would not be collected. The recorded investments in purchased credit impaired loans as of December 31, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018~~2019, were as follows.

	2020			2019			2018			2020			2019
Contractually required principal payments	$	41,658		$	29,895		$	40,772		$	41,658		$	29,895
Discount		(17,686	)		(6,505	)		(10,077	)		(17,686	)		(6,505	)
Recorded investment	$	23,972		$	23,390		$	30,695		$	23,972		$	23,390

The accretable yield associated with these loans was $2,630 ~~$3,127~~ and ~~$3,785~~$3,127 as of December 31, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018.~~2019. The interest income recognized on these loans was $1,583 ~~$2,227~~ and ~~$1,096~~$2,227 for the years ended December 31, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018.~~2019. For the ~~years~~year ended December 31, 2020, ~~and 2018,~~ there was a $1,359 ~~and $714~~ provision for loan losses recorded for these loans. For the year ended December 31, 2019, there was $628 reversal of provision for loan losses recorded for these loans.

Consistent with accounting and regulatory guidance, the Company recognizes a TDR when the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower that would not normally be considered. Regardless of the form of concession granted, the Company’s objective in offering a TDR is to increase the probability of repayment of the borrower’s loan.

The following table summarizes the Company’s TDRs by accrual status at December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019.~~2020.

December 31, 2021					Nonaccrual		Related Allowance for Credit Losses
Commercial real estate					$	5,784	$	1,370
Commercial and industrial						54		27
Residential real estate						1,547		13
Agricultural real estate						2,122		488
Agricultural						1,292		480
Total troubled debt restructurings					$	10,799	$	2,378

December 31, 2020	Nonaccrual		Related Allowance for Loan Losses		Nonaccrual		Related Allowance for Loan Losses
Commercial real estate	$	1,167	$	342	$	1,167	$	342
Commercial and industrial		13,613		1,954		13,613		1,954
Total troubled debt restructurings	$	14,780	$	2,296	$	14,780	$	2,296

December 31, 2019	Nonaccrual		Related Allowance for Loan Losses
Commercial real estate	$	1,247	$	—
Commercial and industrial		14,261	—
Total troubled debt restructurings	$	15,508	$	—

During the year ended December 31, 2020, there were no0 loans modified in a TDR. The following table summarizes information ~~in regard to~~regarding TDRs that were restructured during the year ended December 31, ~~2019.~~

	Number of Loans		Recorded Investment		Impairment Recognized		Number of Loans		Recorded Investment		Impairment Recognized
Commercial real estate		1	$	1,247	$	—		2	$	4,018	$	541
Commercial and industrial		1		14,261		4,994		2		54		27
Residential real estate								2		1,547		13
Agricultural real estate								4		2,122		488
Agricultural								7		1,292		480
Total troubled debt restructurings		2	$	15,508	$	4,994		17	$	9,033	$	1,549

NaN interest income was recognized on TDR loans during the periods ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, as all TDR loans were accounted for as non-accrual.

NaN restructured loans that were modified within the twelve months preceding December 31, 2021 or 2020, have subsequently had a payment default.

There were 0 outstanding commitments to lend additional funds on these loans as of the periods ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019.~~2020.

Changes in other real estate owned for the years ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019~~2020 were as follows.

	2020			2019			2021			2020
Beginning of year	$	8,293		$	6,372		$	11,733		$	8,293
Transfers in		10,729			3,984			2,222			10,729
Acquired in acquisition		636		—			—				636
Net (loss) gain on sales		835			(10	)		462			835
Proceeds from sales		(6,363	)		(1,803	)		(4,732	)		(6,363	)
		14,130			8,543			9,685			14,130
Additions to valuation reserve		(2,397	)		(250	)		(162	)		(2,397	)
Recorded investment	$	11,733		$	8,293		$	9,523		$	11,733

Expenses related to other real estate owned for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018~~2019 were as follows.

	2020			2019			2018			2021			2020			2019
Net loss (gain) on sales	$	(835	)	$	10		$	75		$	(462	)	$	(835	)	$	10
Gain on initial valuation of other real estate properties received		—			(191	)		(920	)		(539	)		—			(191	)
Provision for unrealized losses		2,397			250			265			162			2,397			250
Operating expenses, net of rental income		748			638			509			651			748			638
	$	2,310		$	707		$	(71	)	$	(188	)	$	2,310		$	707

The balance of other real estate owned includes ~~$996~~$329 of foreclosed residential real estate properties recorded as a result of obtaining physical possession of the property at December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, and ~~$741~~$996 at December 31, ~~2019.~~2020. The recorded investment of consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings are in process was $394 at December 31, 2021, and $1,334 at December 31, ~~2020, and $2,174 at December 31, 2019.~~2020. Included in the other real estate owned balance at December 31, 2021 and 2020, is $1,940 and $1,035 related to 3 closed bank locations transferred from premises and equipment.

Major classifications of premises and equipment, stated at cost, are as follows.

	2020			2019			2021			2020
Land	$	20,113		$	17,018		$	21,217		$	20,113
Buildings and improvements		71,923			68,575			86,324			71,923
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		19,928			18,207			23,215			19,928
		111,964			103,800			130,756			111,964
Less: accumulated depreciation		(22,552	)		(19,322	)		(26,718	)		(22,552	)
Premises and equipment, net	$	89,412		$	84,478		$	104,038		$	89,412

At December 31, 2021, the Company had lease liabilities totaling $5,928 and right-of-use assets totaling $5,963 related to operating leases. At December 31, 2020, the Company had lease liabilities totaling $3,524 and right-of-use assets totaling $3,540 ~~related to operating leases. At December 31, 2019, the Company had lease liabilities totaling $4,112 and right-of-use assets totaling $4,153~~ related to operating leases. Lease liabilities and right-of-use assets are reflected in other liabilities and other assets.

	2020		2019		2021		2020
Operating lease cost	$	728	$	726	$	586	$	728
Short-term lease cost		—		—		—		—
Variable lease cost		34		49		35		34
Total operating lease cost	$	762	$	775	$	621	$	762

There were no sales and leaseback transactions, leverage leases, lease transactions with related parties or leases that had not yet commenced during the periods ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 or ~~2019.~~2020.

A maturity analysis of operating lease liabilities and reconciliation of the undiscounted cash flows to the total operating lease liability as of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, is listed below.

Lease payments
Due in one year or less	$	461		$	757
Due after one year through two years		504			709
Due after two years through three years		388			547
Due after three years through four years		214			554
Due after four years through five years		218			552
Thereafter		2,829			3,999
Total undiscounted cash flows		4,614			7,118
Discount on cash flows		(1,090	)		(1,190	)
Total	$	3,524		$	5,928

The assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations are recorded at their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets for tax free acquisitions is recorded as goodwill, none of which is deductible for tax purposes. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets for taxable acquisitions is recorded as goodwill and is deductible for tax purposes.

~~The~~As of December 31, 2021, management conducted a qualitative evaluation of current economic and COVID-19 conditions, Company performance, stock price and other pertinent factors, finally concluding that no goodwill impairment is warranted at this time.

In 2020, the Company performed an interim quantitative analysis to assess goodwill for impairment of Equity Bancshares, Inc., the sole reporting unit. Consideration was given to the ongoing economic market disruption, the movement of the Company’s stock price in relation to other bank indexes and the length of time that the market value of the reporting unit was below its book value as triggering events and completed a quantitative analysis to assess whether or not goodwill was impaired. This analysis determined that goodwill was impaired, and the Company subsequently booked a $104,831 non-cash impairment charge to goodwill on September 30, 2020.

The determination of the September 30, 2020, fair value of the reporting unit incorporated assumptions that marketplace participants would use in their estimates of fair value in a change in control transaction, as prescribed by ASC Topic 820. To arrive at a conclusion of fair value, management utilized both the income approach and the market approach and then applied weighting factors to each approach. Weighting factors represent ~~managements~~management’s best business judgement of the weightings a market participant would utilize in arriving at fair value of the reporting unit. In performing the analysis, Company management made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, reporting unit business performance, economic and market conditions and various other matters, many of which require significant management judgement. Projections related to business unit performance over the next five years assumed an economic downturn over a 12-month time horizon subsequently returning to conservative positive growth rates in loan and deposits after that time period. The analysis performed and the assumptions that were incorporated into the analysis reflect the best currently available estimates and judgements as to the expected future financial performance of the reporting unit at September 30, 2020.

As of December 31, 2020, management conducted a qualitative evaluation of current economic and COVID-19 conditions, Company performance, stock price and other pertinent factors, finally concluding that no additional goodwill impairment is warranted at this time. At December 31, 2020, the Company had goodwill of $31,601 which could be at risk of further impairment with further declines in performance, stock price or market conditions for bank stocks.

The carrying basis of goodwill and core deposit intangibles as of and for the years ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, were as follows.

	Goodwill			Core Deposit			Goodwill			Core Deposit
Balance as of January 1, 2019	$	131,712		$	21,725
Acquired in acquisition		4,720			1,350
Amortization		—			(3,168	)
Balance as of December 31, 2019		136,432			19,907
Balance as of January 1, 2020							$	136,432		$	19,907
Impairment		(104,831	)		—			(104,831	)		—
Amortization		—			(3,850	)		—			(3,850	)
Balance as of December 31, 2020	$	31,601		$	16,057			31,601			16,057
Acquired in acquisition								22,864			2,996
Amortization								—			(4,174	)
Balance as of December 31, 2021							$	54,465		$	14,879

Estimated core deposit intangibles amortization expense for each of the following five years and thereafter is listed in the following table.

Expensed in one year or less	$	4,116	$	4,002
Expensed after one year through two years		3,417		3,099
Expensed after two years through three years		2,627		2,565
Expensed after three years through four years		2,188		1,945
Expensed after four years through five years		1,647		1,355
Thereafter		2,062		1,913
Total	$	16,057	$	14,879

The Company invests in qualified affordable housing projects. At December 31, 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018,~~2019, the balances of the investments in qualified affordable housing projects were $21,658, $7,799 ~~$8,663~~ and ~~$6,689.~~$8,663. These balances are reflected in the other assets line in the consolidated balance sheets. Total unfunded commitments related to the investments in qualified affordable housing projects totaled $17,692, $5,189 ~~$5,836~~ and ~~$3,965~~$5,836 at December 31, 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018.~~2019. The Company expects to fulfill these commitments during the years ~~2021~~2022 through ~~2034.~~2036.

During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018,~~2019, the Company recognized amortization expense of $1,142, $860 ~~$522~~ and ~~$412,~~$522, which was included ~~within~~in pretax income on the consolidated statements of income. Additionally, during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018,~~2019, the Company recognized tax credits from its investment in affordable housing tax credits of $565, $600 ~~$636~~ and ~~$568.~~$636.

The Company periodically enters into interest rate swaps to hedge the fair value of certain commercial real estate loans. These transactions are designated as fair value hedges. In this type of transaction, the Company typically receives from the counterparty a variable-rate cash flow based on the one-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a spread to this index and pays a fixed-rate cash flow equal to the customer loan rate. At December 31, 2021, the portfolio of interest rate swaps had a weighted average maturity of 8.8 years, a weighted average pay rate of 4.63% and a weighted average rate received of 3.11%. At December 31, 2020, the portfolio of interest rate swaps had a weighted average maturity of 6.3 years, a weighted average pay rate of 5.19% and a weighted average rate received of 3.21%.

The Company acquired a swap agreement from ASBI designed to offset interest expense of subordinated debentures. This agreement is designated as a cash flow hedge and is marked to market through other comprehensive income. At December 31, ~~2019, the portfolio of~~2021, this interest rate ~~swaps~~swap had a ~~weighted average~~ maturity of ~~7.3~~13.7 years, a weighted average pay rate of ~~5.19%~~2.81% and a weighted average rate received of ~~4.78%~~1.92%. There were no swaps designated as cash flow hedges at December 31, 2020.

The Company periodically enters into interest rate swaps with our borrowers and simultaneously enters into swaps with a counterparty with offsetting terms for the purpose of providing our borrowers long-term fixed rate loans. Neither swap is designated as a hedge and both are marked to market through earnings. Through the acquisition of ASBI, the Company obtained swap agreements with counterparties designed to offset the economic impact of fixed-rate loans. These swaps did not have corresponding agreements with the borrowers. At December 31, 2021, this portfolio of interest rate swaps had a weighted average maturity of 8.2 years, weighed average pay rate of 4.35% and a weighted average rate received of 4.16%. At December 31, 2020, this portfolio of interest rate swaps had a weighted average maturity of ~~7.9~~6.3 years, ~~weighed average pay rate of 7.33% and~~ a ~~weighted rate received of 7.33%. At December 31, 2019, this portfolio of interest rate swaps had a weighted average maturity of 8.8 years,~~ weighted average pay rate of ~~4.92%~~5.19% and a weighted average rate received of ~~4.92%~~3.21%.

The notional amount of a derivative contract is a factor in determining periodic interest payments or cash flows received or paid. The notional amount of derivatives serves as a level of involvement in various types of derivatives. The notional amount does not represent the Company’s overall exposure to credit or market risk, generally, the exposure is significantly smaller.

The following table shows the notional balances and fair values (including net accrued interest) of the derivatives outstanding by derivative type at December 31, ~~2020~~2021, and December 31, ~~2019.~~2020.

	December 31, 2020							December 31, 2019							December 31, 2021							December 31, 2020
	Notional Amount		Derivative Assets		Derivative Liabilities			Notional Amount		Derivative Assets		Derivative Liabilities			Notional Amount		Derivative Assets		Derivative Liabilities			Notional Amount		Derivative Assets		Derivative Liabilities
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps															$	26,663	$	—	$	369		$	5,585	$	—	$	497
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:
Interest rate swaps	$	5,585	$	—	$	497		$	5,797	$	30	$	177			7,500		602		—			—		—		—
Total derivatives designated as hedging relationships		5,585		—		497			5,797		30		177			34,163		602		369			5,585		—		497
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps		119,341		7,172		7,820			114,571		3,505		3,899			150,780		4,419		5,184			119,341		7,172		7,820
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		119,341		7,172		7,820			114,571		3,505		3,899			150,780		4,419		5,184			119,341		7,172		7,820
Total	$	124,926		7,172		8,317		$	120,368		3,535		4,076		$	184,943		5,021		5,553		$	124,926		7,172		8,317
Cash collateral				—		(8,440	)				—		(4,186	)				—		(8,441	)				—		(8,440	)
Netting adjustments				123		123					182		182					2,994		2,994					123		123
Net amount presented in balance sheet			$	7,295	$	—				$	3,717	$	72				$	8,015	$	106				$	7,295	$	—

The following table shows net gains or losses on derivatives and hedging activities for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018.~~2019.

	2020		2019		2018		2021		2020		2019
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	28	$	0	$	0
Total net gain (loss) related to fair value hedge ineffectiveness		0		0		0
Total net gains (losses) related to derivatives designated as hedging instruments								28		0		0
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:
Interest rate swaps								0		0		0
Total net gains (losses) related to derivatives designated as cash flow hedges								0		0		0
Total net gain (loss) related to hedging relationships								28		0		0
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Economic hedges:
Interest rate swaps		254		307		202		757		254		307
Total net gains (losses) related to derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		254		307		202		757		254		307
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities	$	254	$	307	$	202	$	785	$	254	$	307

The following table shows the recorded net gains or losses on derivatives and the related hedged items in fair value hedging relationships and the impact of those derivatives on the Company’s net interest income for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018.~~

	December 31, 2020											December 31, 2021
	Gain/(Loss) on Derivatives			Gain/(Loss) on Hedged Items			Net Fair Value Hedge Gain/(Loss)		Effect of Derivatives on Net Interest Income			Gain/(Loss) on Derivatives			Gain/(Loss) on Hedged Items			Net Fair Value Hedge Gain/(Loss)		Effect of Derivatives on Net Interest Income
Commercial real estate loans	$	367		$	(367	)	$	0	$	(90	)	$	(14	)	$	42		$	28	$	(156	)
Total	$	367		$	(367	)	$	0	$	(90	)	$	(14	)	$	42		$	28	$	(156	)

	December 31, 2019											December 31, 2020
	Gain/(Loss) on Derivatives			Gain/(Loss) on Hedged Items			Net Fair Value Hedge Gain/(Loss)		Effect of Derivatives on Net Interest Income			Gain/(Loss) on Derivatives			Gain/(Loss) on Hedged Items			Net Fair Value Hedge Gain/(Loss)		Effect of Derivatives on Net Interest Income
Commercial real estate loans	$	(387	)	$	387		$	0	$	21		$	367		$	(367	)	$	0	$	(90	)
Total	$	(387	)	$	387		$	0	$	21		$	367		$	(367	)	$	0	$	(90	)

	December 31, 2018											December 31, 2019
	Gain/(Loss) on Derivatives			Gain/(Loss) on Hedged Items			Net Fair Value Hedge Ineffectiveness		Effect of Derivatives on Net Interest Income			Gain/(Loss) on Derivatives			Gain/(Loss) on Hedged Items			Net Fair Value Hedge Gain/(Loss)		Effect of Derivatives on Net Interest Income
Commercial real estate loans	$	283		$	(283	)	$	0	$	(40	)	$	(387	)	$	387		$	0	$	21
Total	$	283		$	(283	)	$	0	$	(40	)	$	(387	)	$	387		$	0	$	21

Time deposits that met or exceeded the FDIC insurance limit of $250 totaled ~~$171,833~~$233,460 and ~~$285,958~~$170,556 as of December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019.~~2020.

At December 31, 2021 and 2020, Insured Cash Sweep (“ICS”) reciprocal demand deposits of $52,173 and ~~2019,~~$256,037 were included in the Company’s interest bearing deposits. Also included in savings and money market deposits are $308,374 and $23,733 of ICS reciprocal money market deposits. ICS allows Equity Bank to break large deposits into smaller amounts and place them in a network of other ICS banks to ensure FDIC coverage on the entire deposit.

At December 31, 2021 and 2020, Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Services (“CDARS”) deposits of ~~$14,857~~$2,969 and ~~$9,503~~$14,857 were included in the Company’s time deposit balance. Of the CDARS deposits at December 31, 2021 and 2020, $2,969 and ~~2019,~~ $14,857 ~~and $9,503~~ were reciprocal customer funds placed in the CDARS program. CDARS allows Equity Bank to break large deposits into smaller amounts and place them in a network of other CDARS banks to ensure that FDIC insurance coverage is gained on the entire deposit. Reciprocal deposits are not considered brokered deposits as long as the aggregate balance is less than the lesser of 20% of total liabilities or $5 billion and Equity Bank is well capitalized and well rated. All non-reciprocal deposits and reciprocal deposits in excess of regulatory limits are considered brokered deposits.

The following table lists reciprocal and brokered deposits included in total deposits categorized by type.

At December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the scheduled maturities of time deposits are as follows.

Due in one year or less	$	456,542	$	534,149
Due after one year through two years		126,871		79,329
Due after two years through three years		22,709		18,688
Due after three years through four years		10,984		11,191
Due after four years through five years		9,139		9,776
Thereafter		609		465
Total	$	626,854	$	653,598

Federal funds purchased and retail repurchase agreements included the following at December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019.~~2020.

	2020		2019		2021		2020
Federal funds purchased	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0
Retail repurchase agreements	$	36,029	$	35,708	$	56,006	$	36,029

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (retail repurchase agreements) consist of obligations of the Company to other parties. The obligations are secured by residential mortgage-backed securities held by the Company with a fair value of ~~$47,113~~$55,605 and ~~$40,412~~$47,113 at December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019.~~2020. The agreements are on a day-to-day basis and can be terminated on demand.

The following table presents the borrowing usage and interest rate information for federal funds purchased and retail repurchase agreements at and for the years ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019.~~2020.

	2020			2019			2021			2020
Average daily balance during the period	$	45,041		$	42,459		$	45,819		$	45,041
Average interest rate during the period		0.23	%		0.36	%		0.23	%		0.23	%
Maximum month-end balance during the period	$	53,543		$	45,575		$	56,006		$	53,543
Weighted average interest rate at period-end		0.22	%		0.40	%		0.23	%		0.22	%

There were 0 Federal Home Loan Bank advances as of December 31, 2021, advances as of December 31, 2020, ~~and 2019~~ were as follows.

	2020		2019		2020
Federal Home Loan Bank line of credit advances	$	—	$	311,223	$	—
Federal Home Loan Bank fixed rate term advances		10,107		13,095		10,107
Total principal outstanding		10,107		324,318		10,107
Federal Home Loan Bank fixed rate term advances, fair market value adjustments		37		55		37
Total Federal Home Loan Bank advances	$	10,144	$	324,373	$	10,144

At December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020, the Company had 0 funds drawn against its line of credit. ~~At December 31, 2019, the Company had $311,223 drawn against its line of credit at a weighted average rate of 1.79%.~~

At December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, the Company had undisbursed advance commitments (letters of credit) with the Federal Home Loan Bank of ~~$91,700~~$17,025 and ~~$38,500.~~$91,700. These letters of credit were obtained in lieu of pledging securities to secure public fund deposits that are over the FDIC insurance limit.

The advances, Mortgage Partnership Finance credit enhancement obligations and letters of credit were collateralized by certain qualifying loans ~~totaling $763,506~~of $694,892 and ~~$811,394~~securities of $15,409 for a total of $710,302 at December 31, ~~2020~~2021, and ~~2019.~~qualifying loans totaling $763,506 at December 31, 2020. Based on this collateral and the Company’s holdings of Federal Home Loan Bank stock, the Company was eligible to borrow an additional ~~$661,490~~$691,149 and ~~$448,278~~$661,490 at December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019.~~2020.

~~Future principal repayments of the December 31, 2020, outstanding balances are as follows.~~

~~On March 13, 2017, the~~The Company entered into an agreement with an unaffiliated financial institution that provided for a maximum borrowing facility of ~~$30,000,~~$40,000, secured by the Company’s stock in Equity Bank. The ~~borrowing facility was amended on March 11, 2019, to provide a maximum borrowing facility of $40,000 and extend the maturity to May 15, 2020. The~~ loan was ~~extended to August 15, 2020, and subsequently~~ renewed and amended on June 30, 2020, with a maturity date of August 15, ~~2021.~~2021, and was extended to February 11, 2022. Each draw of funds on the facility will create a separate

note that is repayable over a term of five years. Each note will bear interest at the greater of a variable interest rate equal to the prime rate published in the “Money Rates” section of The Wall Street Journal (or any generally recognized successor), floating daily, or a floor of 3.50%. Accrued interest and principal payments will be due quarterly with one final payment of unpaid principal and interest due at the end of the five-year term of each separate note. The Company is

also required to pay an unused commitment fee in an amount equal to 20 basis points per annum on the unused portion of the maximum borrowing facility.

The loan was renewed and amended on February 11, 2022, with a new maturity date of February 11, 2023. With this amendment, the maximum borrowing amount was decreased from $40,000 to $25,000. Each note will bear interest at the greater of a variable interest rate equal to the prime rate published in the “Money Rates” section of The Wall Street Journal (or any generally recognized successor), floating daily, or a floor of 3.25%. The Company is also required to pay an unused commitment fee in an amount equal to 20 basis points per annum on the unused portion of the maximum borrowing facility due on the maturity date of the renewal.

There were 0 bank stock loan advances as of December 31, ~~2020. Bank stock loan advances as of~~2021, or December 31, ~~2019, were as follows.~~2020.

The terms of the borrowing facility require the Company and Equity Bank to maintain minimum capital ratios and other covenants. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2021, the Company was in compliance within our loan contract and within all other terms of the borrowing facility. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, the lender ~~has~~ granted the Company a waiver with reference to the return on assets ratio covenant contained within our loan contract. The Company was in compliance with all other terms of the borrowing facility.

The following table lists outstanding subordinated debt as of December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019.~~2020.

	2020		2019		2021		2020
Subordinated debentures	$	14,872	$	14,561	$	22,924	$	14,872
Subordinated notes		72,812	—			72,961		72,812
Total	$	87,684	$	14,561	$	95,885	$	87,684

In conjunction with the 2012 acquisition of First Community Bancshares, Inc. (FCB), the Company assumed certain subordinated debentures owed to special purpose unconsolidated subsidiaries that are controlled by the Company, FCB Capital Trust II and FCB Capital Trust III, (“CTII” and “CTIII”, respectively).

On March 24, 2005, CTII, an unconsolidated subsidiary of the Company, issued $10,000 of variable rate trust preferred securities, all of which are outstanding at December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019.~~2020. The trust preferred securities issued by CTII accrue and pay distributions quarterly at three-month LIBOR plus 2.00% ~~(2.24%~~(2.12% at December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, and ~~3.99%~~2.24% at December 31, ~~2019)~~2020) on the stated liquidation amount of the trust preferred securities. As an integral part of the acquisition of FCB, the Company has guaranteed fully and unconditionally all of the obligations of CTII. The guaranty covers the quarterly distributions and payments on liquidation or redemption of the trust preferred securities. These trust preferred securities are mandatorily redeemable upon maturity on April 15, 2035, or upon earlier redemption. The Company has the right to redeem the trust preferred securities in whole or in part, on or after April 15, 2015, at a redemption price specified in the indenture plus any accrued but unpaid interest to the redemption date. The proceeds from the sale of the trust preferred securities and the issuance of $310 in common securities to FCB were used by CTII to purchase $10,310 of floating rate subordinated debentures of FCB which have the same payment terms as the trust preferred securities.

On March 30, 2007, CTIII, an unconsolidated subsidiary of the Company, issued $5,000 of variable rate trust preferred securities, all of which are outstanding at December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019.~~2020. The trust preferred securities issued by CTIII accrue and pay distributions quarterly at three-month LIBOR plus 1.89% ~~(2.11%~~(2.09% at December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, and ~~3.78%~~2.11% at December 31, ~~2018)~~2020) on the stated liquidation amount of the trust preferred securities. As an integral part of the acquisition of FCB, the Company has guaranteed fully and unconditionally all of the obligations of CTIII. The guaranty covers the quarterly distributions and payments on liquidation or redemption of the trust preferred securities. These trust preferred securities are mandatorily redeemable upon maturity on June 15, 2037, or upon earlier redemption. The Company has the right to redeem the trust preferred securities in whole or in part at a redemption price specified in the indenture plus any accrued but unpaid interest to the redemption date. The proceeds from the sale of the trust preferred securities and the issuance of $155 in common securities to FCB were used by CTIII to purchase $5,155 of floating rate subordinated debentures of FCB which have the same payment terms as the trust preferred securities.

In conjunction with the 2016 acquisition of Community First Bancshares, Inc. (CFBI), the Company assumed certain subordinated debentures owed to a special purpose unconsolidated subsidiary, Community First (AR) Statutory Trust I, (“CFSTI”). The trust preferred securities issued by CFSTI accrue and pay distributions quarterly at three-month LIBOR plus 3.25% ~~(3.50%~~(3.47% at December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, and ~~5.20%~~3.50% at December 31, ~~2019)~~2020) on the stated liquidation amount of the trust preferred securities. These trust preferred securities are mandatorily redeemable upon maturity on December 26, 2032, or upon earlier redemption.

The common securities issued to the Company by the trusts possess sole voting rights with respect to matters involving those entities. The Company has the right to defer the payment of interest on all of its outstanding trust preferred securities. The Company has the right to declare such a deferral for up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods and deferral may only be declared as long as the Company is not then in default under the provisions of the Amended and Restated Trust Agreements. During the deferral period, interest on the indebtedness continues to accrue and the unpaid interest is compounded. As long as the deferral period continues, the Company is prohibited from: (i) declaring or paying any dividend on any of its capital stock, which would include both its common stock and the outstanding preferred stock issued to the Treasury, or (ii) making any payment on any debt security that is ranked equally with or junior to the securities issued by the trust.

As a part of the acquisition of FCB, the Company recorded the debentures at an estimated fair value of $8,270. As part of the acquisition of CFBI, the Company recorded the debentures at an estimated fair value of $4,187. The initial fair value adjustments will be amortized against earnings on a prospective basis.

In conjunction with the 2021 acquisition of ASBI, the Company assumed certain subordinated debentures owed to a special purpose unconsolidated subsidiary, American State Bank Statutory Trust I, (“ASBSTI”). The trust preferred securities issued by ASBSTI accrue and pay distributions quarterly at three-month LIBOR plus 1.80% (2.00% at December 31, 2021) on the stated liquidation amount of the trust preferred securities. These trust preferred securities are mandatorily redeemable upon maturity on September 15, 2035, or upon earlier redemption.

On September 15, 2005, ASBSTI, an unconsolidated subsidiary of the Company, issued $7,500 of variable rate trust preferred securities, all of which are outstanding at December 31, 2021. As an integral part of the acquisition of ASBI, the Company has guaranteed fully and unconditionally all of the obligations of ASBSTI. The guaranty covers the quarterly distributions and payments on liquidation or redemption of the trust preferred securities. These trust preferred securities are mandatorily redeemable upon maturity on September 15, 2035, or upon earlier redemption. The Company has the right to redeem the trust preferred securities in whole or in part at a redemption price specified in the indenture plus any accrued but unpaid interest to the redemption date. The proceeds from the sale of the trust preferred securities and the issuance of $232 in common securities to ASBI were used by ASBSTI to purchase $7,732 of floating rate subordinated debentures of ASBI which have the same payment terms as the trust preferred securities.

At December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, the contractual balance and the unamortized fair value adjustments were as shown below.

	2020			2019			2021			2020
Contractual balance	$	20,620		$	20,620		$	28,352		$	20,620
Unamortized fair value adjustment		(5,748	)		(6,059	)		(5,428	)		(5,748	)
Net book value	$	14,872		$	14,561		$	22,924		$	14,872

Subordinated debentures are included in Tier 1 capital for purposes of determining the Company’s compliance with regulatory capital requirements.

On June 29, 2020, the Company entered into Subordinated Note Purchase Agreements with certain qualified institutional buyers and institutional accredited investors pursuant to which the Company issued and sold $42,000 in aggregate principal amount of its 7.00% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due 2030. The notes were issued under an Indenture, dated as of June 29, 2020 (the “Indenture”), by and between the Company and UMB Bank, N.A., as trustee. The notes will mature on June 30, 2030. From June 29, 2020, through June 29, 2025, the Company will pay interest on the notes semi-annually in arrears on June 30 and December 30 of each year, commencing on December 30, 2020, at a fixed interest rate of 7.00%. Beginning June 30, 2025, the notes convert to a floating interest rate, to be reset quarterly, equal to the then-current Three-Month Term SOFR, as defined in the Indenture, plus 688 basis points. Interest payments during the floating-rate period will be paid quarterly in arrears on March 30, June 30, September 30 and December 30 of each year, commencing on September 30, 2025. On July 23, 2020, the Company closed on an additional $33,000 of subordinated notes with the same terms as the June 29, 2020, issue.

	December 31, 2020			Weighted Average Rate			Weighted Average Term in Years		December 31, 2021			Weighted Average Rate			Weighted Average Term in Years
Subordinated notes	$	75,000			7.00	%		9.5	$	75,000			7.00	%		8.5
Total principal outstanding		75,000								75,000
Debt issuance cost		(2,188	)							(2,039	)
Total subordinated notes	$	72,812							$	72,961

Subordinated notes are included in Tier 2 capital for purposes of determining the Company’s compliance with regulatory capital requirements.

Future principal repayments of the December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, outstanding balances for all borrowings are as follows.

	Retail Repurchase Agreements		FHLB Advances		Subordinated Debentures		Subordinated Notes		Total		Retail Repurchase Agreements		FHLB Advances		Subordinated Debentures		Subordinated Notes		Total
Due in one year or less	$	36,029	$	2,357	$	—	$	—	$	38,386	$	56,006	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	56,006
Due after one year through two years		—		2,357		—		—		2,357		—		—		—		—		—
Due after two years through three years		—		2,357		—		—		2,357		—		—		—		—		—
Due after three years through four years		—		1,857		—		—		1,857		—		—		—		—		—
Due after four years through five years		—		1,179		—		—		1,179		—		—		—		—		—
Thereafter		—		—		20,620		75,000		95,620		—		—		28,352		75,000		103,352
Total	$	36,029	$	10,107	$	20,620	$	75,000	$	141,756	$	56,006	$	—	$	28,352	$	75,000	$	159,358

At December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, the Company had contractual obligations of ~~$5,189~~$17,692 and ~~$5,836.~~$5,189. Contractual obligations represent commitments made by the Company to make capital investments in limited-liability entities that invest in qualified affordable housing projects. The Company expects to fulfill these commitments during the years ~~2021~~2022 through ~~2034.~~2036.

The Company’s articles of incorporation provide for the issuance of shares of preferred stock. There were 0 shares of preferred stock outstanding at December 31, 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ or ~~2018.~~2019.

The Company’s articles of incorporation provide for the issuance of 45,000,000 shares of Class A voting common stock (“Class A common stock”) and 5,000,000 shares of Class B non-voting common stock (“Class B common stock”), both of which have a par value of $0.01 per share. At December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, the following table presents shares that were issued and were held in treasury or were outstanding.

	2020			2019			2021			2020
Class A common stock – issued		17,224,830			17,136,493			20,077,059			17,224,830
Class A common stock – held in treasury		(2,684,274	)		(1,692,059	)		(3,316,944	)		(2,684,274	)
Class A common stock – outstanding		14,540,556			15,444,434			16,760,115			14,540,556
Class B common stock – issued		234,903			234,903			234,903			234,903
Class B common stock – held in treasury		(234,903	)		(234,903	)		(234,903	)		(234,903	)
Class B common stock – outstanding		—			0			0			0

On April 18, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 1,100,000 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock, from time to time, beginning April 29, 2019, and concluding October 30, 2020. The repurchase program did not obligate the Company to acquire a specific dollar amount or number of shares and it could be extended, modified or

discontinued at any time without notice. Under this program, during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company repurchased a total of 1,100,000 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock at an average price paid of $21.54 per share.

In September of 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized an additional repurchase of up to 800,000 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock, from time to time, beginning October 30, 2020, and concluding October 29, 2021. The repurchase program does not obligate the Company to acquire a specific dollar amount or number of shares and it could be extended, modified or discontinued at any time without notice. Under this program, during the ~~year~~years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company repurchased a total of ~~313,231~~679,557 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock at an average price paid of ~~$20.82~~$24.12 per share.

In September of 2021, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized an additional repurchase of up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock, from time to time, beginning October 29, 2021, and concluding October 28, 2022. The repurchase program does not obligate the Company to acquire a specific dollar amount or number of shares and it could be extended, modified or discontinued at any time without notice. Under this program, during the year ended December 31, 2021, the company repurchased a total of 132,873 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock at an average price paid of $32.99 per share.

In connection with termination of the Company’s restricted stock unit plan (“RSUP”), 203,216 shares of Class A common stock were issued in May 2015 to employees with vested restricted stock units. Additional paid-in capital includes $224 of tax benefits in excess of those previously provided in connection with stock compensation expense. Also, in connection with the termination of the RSUP, the Company agreed to loan electing participants an amount equal to each participant’s federal and state income tax withholding obligation associated with the stock issuance. These loans, totaling $43 at December 31, 2020, ~~are~~were collateralized by the shares received with an extended maturity date of March 31, 2021, and an interest rate of 1.60%. These were paid in full in the first quarter of 2021.

For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, accumulated other comprehensive income consisted of (i) the after-tax effect of unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities and (ii) the after-tax effect of unamortized unrealized gains (losses) on securities transferred from the available-for-sale designation to the held-to-maturity ~~designation.~~designation and unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges. During 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018,~~2019, there were 0$368, $0 and $0 of gains reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to net gains on sales of and settlement of securities within the consolidated statements of ~~operations.~~income. During 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018,~~2019, there was $509 ~~$903~~ and ~~$453~~$903 of accretion reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to taxable interest income on securities within the consolidated statements of ~~operations.~~income.

Components of accumulated other comprehensive income as of December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019~~2020, were as follows.

										Available -for-Sale Securities			Cash Flow Hedges			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
December 31, 2021
Net unrealized or unamortized gains (losses)										$	2,426		$	(58	)	$	2,368
Tax effect											(606	)		14		$	(592	)
	Available -for-Sale Securities			Held-to -Maturity Securities			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			$	1,820		$	(44	)	$	1,776
December 31, 2020
Net unrealized or unamortized gains (losses)	$	26,426		$	—		$	26,426		$	26,426		$	—		$	26,426
Tax effect		(6,645	)		—			(6,645	)		(6,645	)		—			(6,645	)
	$	19,781		$	—		$	19,781		$	19,781		$	—		$	19,781
December 31, 2019
Net unrealized or unamortized gains (losses)	$	985		$	(988	)	$	(3	)
Tax effect		(248	)		248			—
	$	737		$	(740	)	$	(3	)

Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019 is listed in the following ~~table.~~table

	2020			2019		2018		2021		2020			2019
Current income tax expense
Federal	$	9,054		$	4,066	$	4,655	$	7,614	$	9,054		$	4,066
State		2,435			1,649		2,212		2,750		2,435			1,649
Total current income tax expense		11,489			5,715		6,867		10,364		11,489			5,715
Deferred income tax expense
Federal		(8,770	)		1,444		2,933		1,009		(8,770	)		1,444
State		(2,319	)		119		550		583		(2,319	)		119
Total deferred income tax expense		(11,089	)		1,563		3,483		1,592		(11,089	)		1,563
Total income tax expense	$	400		$	7,278	$	10,350	$	11,956	$	400		$	7,278

A reconciliation of income tax expense at the U.S. federal statutory rate (21% in 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018)~~2019) to the Company’s actual income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019 is shown below.

	2020			2019			2018			2021			2020			2019
Computed at the statutory rate	$	(15,660	)	$	6,900		$	9,697		$	13,532		$	(15,660	)	$	6,900
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
State and local taxes, net of federal benefit		407			1,422			1,909			2,333			407			1,422
Tax-exempt interest		(766	)		(885	)		(844	)		(597	)		(766	)		(885	)
Non-taxable life insurance income		(408	)		(419	)		(462	)		(736	)		(408	)		(419	)
Non-deductible expenses		183			353			264			409			183			353
Share-based payments		77			18			(23	)		(480	)		77			18
Federal tax credits		(600	)		(636	)		(568	)		(2,754	)		(600	)		(636	)
Non-deductible goodwill		17,584		—			—			—				17,584		—
Bargain purchase gain		(450	)	—			—				(123	)		(450	)	—
Change in valuation allowance		164			396			655			379			164			396
Other		(131	)		129			(278	)		(176	)		(131	)		129
Non-deductible transactions costs											169		—			—
Income tax expense	$	400		$	7,278		$	10,350		$	11,956		$	400		$	7,278

~~F-39~~The increase in the income tax benefit related to federal tax credits was primarily driven by the impact of environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) investments in renewable energy. The benefits of these investments primarily consist of tax credits.

Components of deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2021 and 2020 are shown in the table below.

	2020			2019			2021			2020
Deferred tax assets
Allowance for loan losses	$	8,376		$	3,076		$	12,514		$	8,376
Tax credit carryforwards		897			974			810			897
Goodwill amortization		3,102			(1,871	)		2,996			3,102
Accrued compensation		2,159			2,209			2,583			2,159
Net operating loss and attribute carryforwards		1,189			1,338			1,907			1,189
Other real estate owned		708			481			508			708
Acquired loans fair market value adjustments		1,897			2,717			72			1,897
Deferred revenue								566			—
Other		1,342			1,152			1,389			1,342
Gross deferred tax assets		19,670			10,076			23,345			19,670
Deferred tax liabilities
Assumed debt fair market value adjustments		1,389			1,464			1,348			1,389
Depreciation		4,491			3,934			5,148			4,491
Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends		445			841			219			445
Acquisition related basis adjustment		938		—				—			938
Net unrealized or unamortized gains (losses) on securities		6,646			(1	)		590			6,646
Core deposit intangibles		2,757			3,616			2,330			2,757
Other		377			564			493			377
Gross deferred tax liabilities		17,043			10,418			10,128			17,043
Valuation allowance		(1,479	)		(1,623	)		(2,348	)		(1,479	)
Net deferred tax asset (liability)	$	1,148		$	(1,965	)	$	10,869		$	1,148

Deferred income tax balances reflect the effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax basis and are stated at enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered. ~~In 2019, the Company recognized deferred tax liabilities of $21 for temporary differences associated with the MidFirst acquisition.~~ Federal net operating losses acquired through previous acquisitions were fully utilized at December 31, 2020. Acquired federal tax credits totaling ~~$897~~$810 at December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, will expire between 2029 and 2034. The utilization of these tax credit carryforwards is not expected to be limited by Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) sections 382 and 383.

The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as state income taxes in ~~Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma and Iowa.~~multiple jurisdictions. Commercial banks are not allowed to file consolidated Kansas returns with non-bank consolidated group members. The state of Kansas allows net operating losses incurred for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, to be carried forward indefinitely while those generated prior to this can be carried forward ten years. The Company has unused ~~state~~Kansas net operating loss carryforwards of approximately ~~$32,006 that expire between 2021~~$37,728 generated through operations and ~~2030 resulting from the separate Kansas corporate returns of Equity Bancshares, Inc. and SA Holdings, Inc.~~$19,902 acquired through acquisitions. These net operating losses have a valuation allowance of ~~$28,319~~$37,728 and $19,902, respectively, recorded against ~~them.~~them and expire between 2022 and 2027 for those incurred for tax years beginning before December 31, 2017, with the remaining carried forward indefinitely. In connection with a 2015 acquisition, the Company acquired Kansas net operating losses useable against Kansas bank income. At December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the Kansas net operating loss carryforward useable against Kansas bank income totaled ~~$2,054~~$1,638 with expiration dates between ~~2021~~2022 and 2024. The utilization of this acquired Kansas net operating loss carryforward is expected to be limited and a valuation allowance has been recorded against the portion which is expected to expire unused. In establishing a valuation allowance, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Based on this analysis, certain deferred tax assets have a valuation allowance recorded against them resulting in a zero carrying value. The Company is generally no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local tax examinations for years before ~~2017.~~2018. At December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, there were no examinations in any jurisdiction.

Banks and bank holding companies are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and, additionally for banks, prompt corrective action regulations, involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators. Failure to meet capital requirements can initiate regulatory action. The final rules implementing the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s capital guidelines for U.S. banks (Basel III rules) became effective for the Company on January 1, 2015, with full compliance with all of the requirements being phased in over a multi-year schedule, and fully phased in January 1, 2019. The Basel III rules also require banks to maintain a Common Equity Tier 1 capital

ratio of 6.5%, a total Tier 1 capital ratio of 8%, a total capital ratio of 10% and a leverage ratio of 5% to be deemed “well capitalized” for purposes of certain rules and prompt corrective action requirements. The risk-based ratios include a “capital conservation buffer” of 2.5%. The new capital conservation buffer requirement was to be phased in beginning January 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and increased by that amount each year until fully implemented January 2019. An institution is subject to limitations on certain

activities, including payment of dividends, share repurchases and discretionary bonuses to executive officers, if its capital level is below the buffer amount. Management believes as of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the Company and Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

Prompt corrective action regulations provide five classifications: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept brokered deposits. If undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as are asset growth and acquisitions and capital restoration plans are required.

As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the most recent notifications from the federal regulatory agencies categorized Equity Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, Equity Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed Equity Bank’s category.

The Company’s and Equity Bank’s capital amounts and ratios at December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, are presented in the tables below. Ratios provided for Equity Bancshares, Inc. represent the ratios of the Company on a consolidated basis.

	Actual					Minimum Required for Capital Adequacy Under Basel III					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Provisions					Actual					Minimum Required for Capital Adequacy Under Basel III					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
December 31, 2020
December 31, 2021
Total capital to risk weighted assets
Equity Bancshares, Inc.	$	462,865		17.35	%	$	280,072		10.50	%	$	N/A		N/A		$	571,514		15.96	%	$	376,013		10.50	%	$	N/A		N/A
Equity Bank		418,992		15.73	%		279,646		10.50	%		266,329		10.00	%		546,503		15.28	%		375,646		10.50	%		357,758		10.00	%
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets
Equity Bancshares, Inc.		356,707		13.37	%		226,725		8.50	%		N/A		N/A			453,718		12.67	%		304,391		8.50	%		N/A		N/A
Equity Bank		385,696		14.48	%		226,380		8.50	%		213,064		8.00	%		501,711		14.02	%		304,094		8.50	%		286,206		8.00	%
Common equity Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets
Equity Bancshares, Inc.		341,835		12.82	%		186,714		7.00	%		N/A		N/A			430,794		12.03	%		250,675		7.00	%		N/A		N/A
Equity Bank		385,696		14.48	%		186,431		7.00	%		173,114		6.50	%		501,711		14.02	%		250,430		7.00	%		232,543		6.50	%
Tier 1 leverage to average assets
Equity Bancshares, Inc.		356,707		9.30	%		153,490		4.00	%		N/A		N/A			453,718		9.09	%		199,563		4.00	%		N/A		N/A
Equity Bank		385,696		10.07	%		153,276		4.00	%		191,595		5.00	%		501,711		10.07	%		199,381		4.00	%		249,226		5.00	%

	Actual					Minimum Required for Capital Adequacy Under Basel III					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Provisions					Actual					Minimum Required for Capital Adequacy Under Basel III					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2020
Total capital to risk weighted assets
Equity Bancshares, Inc.	$	352,853		12.59	%	$	294,341		10.50	%	$	N/A		N/A		$	462,865		17.35	%	$	280,072		10.50	%	$	N/A		N/A
Equity Bank		348,951		12.47	%		293,917		10.50	%		279,921		10.00	%		418,992		15.73	%		279,646		10.50	%		266,329		10.00	%
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets
Equity Bancshares, Inc.		340,621		12.15	%		238,276		8.50	%		N/A		N/A			356,707		13.37	%		226,725		8.50	%		N/A		N/A
Equity Bank		336,719		12.03	%		237,933		8.50	%		223,937		8.00	%		385,696		14.48	%		226,380		8.50	%		213,064		8.00	%
Common equity Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets
Equity Bancshares, Inc.		326,060		11.63	%		196,227		7.00	%		N/A		N/A			341,835		12.82	%		186,714		7.00	%		N/A		N/A
Equity Bank		336,719		12.03	%		195,945		7.00	%		181,949		6.50	%		385,696		14.48	%		186,431		7.00	%		173,114		6.50	%
Tier 1 leverage to average assets
Equity Bancshares, Inc.		340,621		9.02	%		151,072		4.00	%		N/A		N/A			356,707		9.30	%		153,490		4.00	%		N/A		N/A
Equity Bank		336,719		8.92	%		150,943		4.00	%		188,679		5.00	%		385,696		10.07	%		153,276		4.00	%		191,595		5.00	%

Equity Bank is subject to certain restrictions on the amount of dividends that it may declare without prior regulatory approval.

At December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, the Company had loans outstanding to executive officers, directors, significant stockholders and their affiliates (related parties) in the amount of ~~$1,978~~$12,358 and ~~$2,030.~~$1,978. Changes during ~~2020~~2021 are listed below.

	2020			2021
Balance at January 1, 2020	$	2,030
Balance at January 1, 2021				$	1,978
New loans/advances		1,363			14,655
Repayments		(1,415	)		(4,275	)
Balance at December 31, 2020	$	1,978
Balance at December 31, 2021				$	12,358

At December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, the Company had deposits from executive officers, directors, significant stockholders and their affiliates (related parties) in the amount of ~~$6,108~~$20,936 and ~~$6,894.~~$6,108.

The Company has a defined contribution profit sharing plan and a retirement savings 401(k) plan covering substantially all employees. Employees may contribute up to ~~$20 of their compensation.~~IRS maximum contribution limit. Contributions to the profit-sharing plan and 401(k) plan are discretionary and are determined annually by the Board of Directors. Employer contributions charged to expense for 2021, 2020 and 2019 were $1,140, $1,023 and ~~2018 were $1,023, $826 and $885.~~$826.

As a result of the acquisition of First Independence, the Company assumed the obligations related to First Independence’s participation in the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan for Financial Institutions, a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan. The Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan is treated as a multi-employer plan for accounting purposes but operates as a multiple-employer plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and the Internal Revenue Code. As a result, certain multi-employer plan disclosures are not applicable to the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan. Under the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan, contributions made by a participating employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers because assets contributed by an employer are not segregated in a separate account or restricted to provide benefits only to employees of that employer. Also, in the event a participating employer is unable to meet its contribution requirements, the required contributions for the other participating employers could increase proportionately.

The Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan covered substantially all officers and employees of First Independence who began employment prior to December 31, 2009, with 54 participants retaining benefits under the plan.

The Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan operates on a fiscal year from July 1 through June 30 and files one Form 5500 on behalf of all employers who participate in the plan. The Employer Identification Number is 13-5645888 and the three-digit plan number is 333. There are 0 collective bargaining agreements in place at the Company.

The Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan’s annual valuation process includes calculating the plan’s funded status and separately calculating the funded status of each participating employer. The funded status is defined as the market value of assets divided by the funding target (100 percent of the present value of all benefit liabilities accrued at that date). As permitted by ERISA, the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan accepts contributions for the prior plan year up to eight and a half months after the asset valuation date. As a result, the fair value of assets at the valuation date (July 1) will increase by any subsequent contributions designated for the immediately preceding plan year ended June 30. The most recent Form 5500 available for the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan is for the year ended June 30, 2019.

The following table presents the net pension cost and funded status of the Company relating to the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan since the date of acquisition (dollar amounts in thousands).

	2020			2019			2021			2020
Net pension cost charged to salaries and employee benefits	$	158		$	142		$	168		$	158
Pentegra defined benefit plan funded status as of July 1		108.20	%		108.62	%		129.62	%		108.20	%
Plan's funded status as of July 1		90.55	%		91.40	%		101.26	%		90.55	%
Contributions paid to the plan	$	144		$	109		$	150		$	144

The Company’s contributions to the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan were less than 5.00% of the total contributions to the Pentegra Defined Benefit plan for the plan year ended June 30, 2019.

The Company’s Amended and Restated 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan) reserved 1,500,000 shares for the grant of non-qualified stock options, restricted stock units, restricted stock and unrestricted stock to its employees and directors. The Plan replaced the 2006 Non-qualified Stock Option Plan (2006 Plan). Under the 2006 Plan, there were ~~150,000~~0 and 150,000 fully vested and exercisable options outstanding at December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019.~~2020. NaN new grants of options may be made under the 2006 Plan. The Company believes that stock-based awards better align the interests of its employees with those of its stockholders. Under the Company’s ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019~~2020 director compensation policy, the directors receive a portion of their compensation in stock. For the years ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, the Company recognized expense of $285 and $260 and ~~$160~~issued 10,242 and ~~issued~~ 17,703 ~~and 9,104~~ shares. For years prior to 2019, the directors could elect to receive all or a portion of their fees in cash, Company stock or non-qualified stock options. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recognized director compensation expense of $53 and issued 1,375 shares of Company stock pursuant to certain directors’ elections. At December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, there were ~~497,501~~391,101 shares available for equity awards under the Plan.

Stock Option Awards: Options granted to directors and employees under the Plan vest depending on the passage of time or the achievement of performance targets, depending on the terms of the underlying grant.

The following tables summarize stock option activity for the years ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019.~~2020.

There were no stock options granted during the year ended December 31, 2020. The fair values of stock options granted during the years ended December 31, ~~2019~~2021 and ~~2018,~~2019, were estimated to be ~~$7.10~~$5.85 per share and ~~$9.01~~$7.10 per share. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a closed form option valuation (Black-Scholes) model. Expected stock price volatility is based on the historical volatility of the SNL Bank Index. The expected term of options granted is based on the Simplified Method. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant.

The fair values of options granted were determined using the following weighted-average assumptions as of grant dates.

	2019			2018			2021			2019
Risk free rate		2.52	%		2.45	%		0.62	%		2.52	%
Market value of stock on grant date	$	32.43		$	34.69		$	22.08		$	32.43
Expected term (in years)		5.8			6.3			6.0			5.8
Expected volatility		15.71	%		19.71	%		26.13	%		15.71	%
Dividend rate		—	%		—	%		—	%		—	%

Compensation expense for stock options is recognized as the options vest. Total stock option compensation cost that has been charged against income was $201, $464, and $520 for 2021, 2020 and ~~$813 for 2020, 2019 and 2018.~~2019. The total income tax benefit was $51, $117 ~~$131~~ and ~~$205.~~$131. At December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, there was ~~$529~~$109 thousand of unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock options granted under the Plan. Unrecognized compensation expense at December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, will be recognized over a remaining weighted average period of 54.7 years.

Restricted Stock Unit Awards: Restricted stock units (RSUs) granted to employees under the Plan represent the right to receive one share of Company stock upon vesting, in accordance with the vesting schedule provided in each award agreement. To the extent vested, the RSUs become Class A voting common stock within ten calendar days of the vesting date. Non-vested RSUs have no voting rights and are not considered outstanding until vesting. The fair value of the RSUs is determined by the closing price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant.

Non-vested Restricted Stock Units						Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested RSUs at January 1, 2021							261,078		$	30.39
Granted							169,696			22.58
Vested							(74,454	)		32.56
Forfeited							(68,583	)		30.75
Outstanding at December 31, 2021							287,737		$	25.13

Non-vested Restricted Stock Units	Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested RSUs at January 1, 2020		187,450		$	34.56		187,450		$	34.56
Granted		126,827			25.38		126,827			25.38
Vested		(34,891	)		34.36		(34,891	)		34.36
Forfeited		(18,308	)		30.58		(18,308	)		30.58
Outstanding at December 31, 2020		261,078		$	30.39		261,078		$	30.39

Non-vested Restricted Stock Units	Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested RSUs at January 1, 2019		132,107		$	36.78
Granted		102,995			32.01
Vested		(23,628	)		36.29
Forfeited		(24,024	)		34.14
Outstanding at December 31, 2019		187,450		$	34.56

Compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period of the award based on the fair value of RSU awards at the grant date. The Company recognized share-based compensation attributable to RSUs of $2,285, $2,650 ~~$1,991~~ and ~~$1,643~~$1,991 for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018.~~2019. The total income tax benefit was $575, $667 ~~$501~~ and ~~$413~~$501 for the same time periods. Unrecognized RSU compensation expense of ~~$4.1~~$4.5 million at December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, will be recognized over a remaining weighted average period of 22.4 years.

On January 27, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the Equity Bancshares, Inc. 2019 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) and reserved 500,000 shares of common stock for issuance. The ESPP was approved by the Company’s stockholders on April 24, 2019. The ESPP enables eligible employees to purchase the Company’s common stock at a price per share equal to 85% of the lower of the fair market value of the common stock at the beginning or end of each offering period. The following table presents the offering periods and costs associated with this program.

Offering Period	Shares Purchased		Cost Per Share		Compensation Expense		Shares Purchased		Cost Per Share		Compensation Expense
February 15, 2019 to August 14, 2019		19,221	$	21.07	$	72		19,221	$	21.07	$	72
August 15, 2019 to February 14, 2020		16,764		21.11		63		16,764		21.11		63
February 15, 2020 to August 14, 2020		17,829		13.61		43		17,829		13.61		43
August 15, 2020 to February 14, 2021								17,621		13.68		42
February 15, 2021 to August 14, 2021								16,034		20.50		58

	2020			2019		2018		2021		2020			2019
Basic:
Net income allocable to common stockholders	$	(74,970	)	$	25,579	$	35,825	$	52,480	$	(74,970	)	$	25,579
Weighted average common shares outstanding		15,097,726			15,618,690		15,389,513		15,016,725		15,097,726			15,618,690
Weighted average vested restricted stock units		786			1,201		4,403		2,496		786			1,201
Weighted average shares		15,098,512			15,619,891		15,393,916		15,019,221		15,098,512			15,619,891
Basic earnings per common share	$	(4.97	)	$	1.64	$	2.33	$	3.49	$	(4.97	)	$	1.64
Diluted:
Net income allocable to common stockholders	$	(74,970	)	$	25,579	$	35,825	$	52,480	$	(74,970	)	$	25,579
Weighted average common shares outstanding for:
Basic earnings per common share		15,098,512			15,619,891		15,393,916		15,019,221		15,098,512			15,619,891
Dilutive effects of the assumed exercise of stock options	—				201,409		293,588		164,704	—				201,409
Dilutive effects of the assumed redemption of RSUs		—			21,839		20,882		120,622	—				21,839
Dilutive effects of the assumed exercise of Employee Stock Purchase Plan									1,884		—			—
Average shares and dilutive potential common shares		15,098,512			15,843,139		15,708,386		15,306,431		15,098,512			15,843,139
Diluted earnings per common share	$	(4.97	)	$	1.61	$	2.28	$	3.43	$	(4.97	)	$	1.61

	2020		2019		2018		2021		2020		2019
Dilutive effects of the assumed exercise of stock options		98,943		—		—		—		98,943		—
Dilutive effects of the assumed vesting of restricted stock units		37,677		—		—		—		37,677		—
Dilutive effects of the assumed exercise of ESPP purchases		3,367		—		—		—		3,367		—
Total dilutive shares		139,987		—		—		—		139,987		—

Average outstanding stock options and RSUs not included in the computation of diluted earnings (loss) because they were antidilutive are shown below.

	2020		2019		2018		2021		2020		2019
Stock options		309,951		308,933		26,419		55,872		309,951		308,933
Restricted stock units		135,155		2,027		—		451		135,155		2,027
Total antidilutive shares		445,106		310,960		26,419		56,323		445,106		310,960

The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to disclose the fair value of its financial instruments. Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. For disclosure purposes, the Company groups its financial and non-financial assets and liabilities into three different levels based on the nature of the instrument and the availability and reliability of the information that is used to determine fair value. The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values are defined as follows.

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

Level 1 inputs are considered to be the most transparent and reliable. The Company assumes the use of the principal market to conduct a transaction of each particular asset or liability being measured and then considers the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. Whenever possible, the Company first looks for quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets (Level 1 inputs) to value each asset or liability. However, when inputs from identical assets or liabilities on active markets are not available, the Company utilizes market observable data for similar assets and liabilities. The Company maximizes the use of observable inputs and limits the use of unobservable inputs to occasions when observable inputs are not available. The need to use unobservable inputs generally results from the lack of market liquidity of the actual financial instrument or of the underlying collateral. Although, in some instances, third party price indications may be available, limited trading activity can challenge the implied value of those quotations.

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of each instrument under the hierarchy.

The fair values of available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value on a recurring basis. To the extent possible, observable quoted prices in an active market are used to determine fair value and, as such, these securities are classified as Level 1. For securities where quoted prices are not available, fair values are calculated based on market prices of similar securities, generally determined by matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the ~~securities’~~securities�� relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs). The Company’s available-for-sale securities include residential mortgage-backed securities (all of which are issued or guaranteed by government sponsored agencies) and are classified as Level 2.

The fair values of derivatives are determined based on a valuation pricing model using readily available observable market parameters such as interest rate yield curves (Level 2 inputs) adjusted for credit risk attributable to the seller of the derivative.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below.

	December 31, 2020							December 31, 2021
	Level 1			Level 2		Level 3		Level 1			Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. Government-sponsored entities	$	—		$	1,023	$	—	$	—		$	123,407	$	—
U.S. Treasury securities		—			4,025		—		155,602			—		—
Mortgage backed securities
Government-sponsored residential mortgage backed securities		—			651,425		—		—			664,887		—
Private label residential mortgage backed securities		—			44,178		—		—			171,688		—
Corporate		—			53,650		—		—			53,777		—
Small Business Administration loan pools		—			1,270		—		—			16,475		—
State and political subdivisions		—			116,256		—		—			141,606		—
Derivative assets:
Derivative assets (included in other assets)		—			7,172		—		—			5,021		—
Cash collateral held by counterparty and netting adjustments		123		—			—		2,994		—			—
Total derivative assets		123			7,172		—		2,994			5,021		—
Other assets:
Equity securities with readily determinable fair value		506			—		—		644			—		—
Total other assets		506			—		—		644			—		—
Total assets	$	629		$	878,999	$	—	$	159,240		$	1,176,861	$	—
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities:
Derivative liabilities (included in other liabilities)	$	—		$	8,317	$	—	$	—		$	5,553	$	—
Cash collateral held by counterparty and netting adjustments		(8,317	)		—		—		(5,447	)		—		—
Total derivative liabilities		(8,317	)		8,317		—		(5,447	)		5,553		—
Total liabilities	$	(8,317	)	$	8,317	$	—	$	(5,447	)	$	5,553	$	—

	December 31, 2019							December 31, 2020
	Level 1			Level 2		Level 3		Level 1			Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. Government-sponsored entities								$	—		$	1,023	$	—
U.S. Treasury securities									—			4,025		—
Mortgage backed securities
Government-sponsored residential mortgage backed securitites	$	—		$	142,067	$	—
Government-sponsored residential mortgage backed securities									—			651,425		—
Private label residential mortgage backed securities									—			44,178		—
Corporate									—			53,650		—
Small Business Administration loan pools									—			1,270		—
State and political subdivisions									—			116,256		—
Derivative assets:
Derivative assets (included in other assets)		—			3,535		—		—			7,172		—
Cash collateral held by counterparty and netting adjustments		182			—		—		123		—			—
Total derivative assets		182			3,535		—		123			7,172		—
Other assets:
Equity securities with readily determinable fair value		489			—		—		506			—		—
Total other assets		489			—		—		506			—		—
Total assets	$	671		$	145,602	$	—	$	629		$	878,999	$	—
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities:
Derivative liabilities (included in other liabilities)	$	—		$	4,076	$	—	$	—		$	8,317	$	—
Cash collateral held by counterparty and netting adjustments		(4,004	)		—		—		(8,317	)		—		—
Total derivative liabilities		(4,004	)		4,076		—		(8,317	)		8,317		—
Total liabilities	$	(4,004	)	$	4,076	$	—	$	(8,317	)	$	8,317	$	—

There were 0 transfers between Levels during ~~2020~~2021 or ~~2019.~~2020. The Company’s policy is to recognize transfers into or out of a level as of the end of a reporting period.

Certain assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis when there is evidence of impairment. The fair values of impaired loans with specific allocations of the allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses are generally based on recent real estate appraisals of the collateral. Declines in the fair values of other real estate owned, subsequent to their initial acquisitions, are also based on recent real estate appraisals less selling costs.

Real estate appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are typically significant and result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.

The Company did 0t record any liabilities for which the fair value was measured on a non-recurring basis during the years ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019.~~2020.

Valuations of impaired loans and other real estate owned utilize third party appraisals or broker price opinions and are classified as Level 3 due to the significant judgment involved. Appraisals may include the utilization of unobservable inputs, subjective factors and utilize quantitative data to estimate fair market value.

The following table presents additional information about the unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of financial assets measured on a nonrecurring basis that were categorized with Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

	Fair Value		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range (weighted average)	Fair Value		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range (weighted average)
December 31, 2021
Impaired real estate loans						$	17,921	Sales Comparison Approach	Adjustments for differences between comparable sales	5% - 31% (18%)

Impaired other real estate owned						$	2,234	Sales Comparison Approach	Adjustments for differences between comparable sales	3% - 20% (12%)
December 31, 2020
Impaired real estate loans	$	13,443	Sales Comparison Approach	Adjustments for differences between comparable sales	2% - 22% (12%)	$	13,443	Sales Comparison Approach	Adjustments for differences between comparable sales	2% - 22% (12%)

Impaired other loans	$	11,659	Multiple of Earnings	Multiples of earnings for comparable entities	4.5X - 5.5X (5.0X)	$	11,659	Multiple of Earnings	Multiples of earnings for comparable entities	4.5X - 5.5X (5.0X)

Impaired other real estate owned	$	4,351	Sales Comparison Approach	Adjustments for differences between comparable sales	16% - 42% (29%)	$	4,351	Sales Comparison Approach	Adjustments for differences between comparable sales	16% - 42% (29%)
December 31, 2019
Impaired real estate loans	$	9,173	Sales Comparison Approach	Adjustments for differences between comparable sales	3% - 12% (8%)

Impaired other loans	$	14,261	Multiple of Earnings	Multiples of earnings for comparable entities	4.5X - 5.5X (5.0X)

Impaired other real estate owned	$	1,310	Sales Comparison Approach	Adjustments for differences between comparable sales	10% - 55% (32%)

Carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments at year end were as follows as of the date indicated.

The Company extends credit for commercial real estate mortgages, residential mortgages, working capital financing and loans to businesses and consumers.

Commitments to originate loans and available lines of credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments and lines of credit generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since a portion of the commitments and lines of credit may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment and lines of credit amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Each customer’s creditworthiness is evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies, but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, commercial real estate, and residential real estate. Mortgage loans in the process of origination represent amounts that the Company plans to fund within a normal period of 60 to 90 days and are intended for sale to investors in the secondary market.

The contractual amounts of commitments to originate loans and available lines of credit as of December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019~~2020 were as follows.

	December 31, 2020				December 31, 2019				December 31, 2021				December 31, 2020
	Fixed Rate		Variable Rate		Fixed Rate		Variable Rate		Fixed Rate		Variable Rate		Fixed Rate		Variable Rate
Commitments to make loans	$	50,123	$	129,860	$	41,916	$	141,685	$	101,923	$	173,976	$	50,123	$	129,860
Mortgage loans in the process of origination		13,826		1,713		9,200		2,473		7,404		2,353		13,826		1,713
Unused lines of credit		120,720		226,731		95,866		150,749		106,291		317,249		120,720		226,731

At December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the fixed rate loan commitments have interest rates ranging from ~~2.40%~~2.49% to ~~7.51%~~18% and maturities ranging from 1 month to ~~128~~371 months.

Standby letters of credit are irrevocable commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party once specified pre-conditions are met. Financial standby letters of credit are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing and similar transactions. Performance standby letters of credit are issued to guarantee performance of certain customers under non-financial contractual obligations. The credit risk involved in issuing standby letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. The contractual amounts of standby letters of credit as of December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019~~2020 are listed below.

The Company is party to various matters of litigation in the ordinary course of business. The Company periodically reviews all outstanding pending or threatened legal proceedings and determines if such matters will have an adverse effect on the business, financial condition or results of operations or cash flows. A loss contingency is recorded when the outcome is probable and reasonably able to be estimated. The following loss contingencies have been identified by the Company as reasonably possible to result in an unfavorable outcome for the Company or the Bank.

Equity Bank iswas a party to a lawsuit filed on November 5, 2020, in Missouri federal court on behalf of one of our customers, alleging improperly collected overdraft fees. The plaintiff ~~seeks~~sought to have the case certified as a class action. The ~~plaintiff attempted to have~~Company was successful in obtaining a dismissal of one of the ~~case transferred from~~two claims asserted and then settled the ~~assigned judge to another judge in~~suit while the ~~district. That motion was denied. The Bank was served on February 2, 2021. The Company plans to file a~~ motion to dismiss the ~~claims.~~remaining claim was under consideration. The Company believes that the lawsuit is without merit and it intends to vigorously defend against all claims asserted. At this time, the Company is unable to reasonably estimate the outcome of this litigation.case was dismissed with prejudice on November 29, 2021.

The majority of the Company’s revenues come from interest income on financial instruments, including loans, leases, securities and derivatives, which are outside the scope of ASC 606. The Company’s services that fall within the scope of ASC 606 are presented with non-interest income and are recognized as revenue as the Company satisfies its obligation to the customer. Services within the scope of ASC 606 include service charges and fees on deposits, debit card income, investment referral income, insurance sales commissions and other non-interest income related to loans and deposits.

Except for gains or losses from the sale of other real estate owned, all of the Company’s revenue from contracts with customers within the scope of ASC 606 is recognized in non-interest income. The following table presents the Company’s sources of non-interest income for the years ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019.~~2020.

	2020			2019		2021			2020
Non-interest income
Service charges and fees	$	6,856		$	8,672	$	8,596		$	6,856
Debit card income		9,136			8,230		10,236			9,136
Mortgage banking^(a)		3,153			2,468		3,306			3,153
Increase in bank-owned life insurance^(a)		1,941			1,998		3,506			1,941
Net gain on acquisition^(a)		2,145			—		585			2,145
Net gain (loss) from securities transactions^(a)		11			14		406			11
Other non-interest income
Investment referral income		567			590		678			567
Trust income		433			243		1,140			433
Insurance sales commissions		275			177		545			275
Recovery on zero-basis purchased loans^(a)		134			143		85			134
Income from equity method investments^(a)		(210	)		26		(222	)		(210	)
Other non-interest income related to loans and deposits		1,299			2,340		3,703			1,299
Other non-interest income not related to loans and deposits^(a)		283			87		278			283
Total other non-interest income		2,781			3,606		6,207			2,781
Total	$	26,023		$	24,988	$	32,842		$	26,023
^(a)Not within the scope of ASC 606

A description of the Company’s revenue streams accounted for under ASC 606 follows.

The company earns fees from its deposit customers for transaction-based account maintenance and overdraft services. Transaction-based fees, which include services such as stop payment charges, statement rendering and ACH fees, are recognized at the time the transaction is executed as that is the point in time the Company fulfills the customer’s request. Account maintenance fees, which relate primarily to monthly maintenance, are earned over the course of a month, representing the period over which the Company satisfies the performance obligation. Overdraft fees are recognized at the point in time that the overdraft occurs. Service charges on deposits are collected through withdrawal from the customer’s account balance.

The Company earns debit card income from cardholder transactions conducted through payment processors. Debit card income from cardholder transactions represents a percentage of the underlying transaction value and is recognized concurrently with the transaction processing services provided to the cardholder.

Investment referral services are offered through an unaffiliated registered broker-dealer and investment advisor. Investment referral income consists of transaction-based fees (i.e., trade commissions) and account fees (i.e., custodial fees). The service obligation for transaction-based fees relates to processing of individual transactions and is considered earned at the time the transaction occurs. The Company currently records this income when payment is received and at each month end for current-month transactions. Account fees are considered earned over the period for which the fees relate. These fees are received during the first month of each quarter and represent advance payment for the current quarter. These fees are amortized ratably over the three months during the quarter. Therefore, all account-based fees are currently recorded as performance obligations are satisfied.

Trust income includes fees from asset management, custody, recordkeeping, investment advisory and administration services. Revenue is recognized at the time the services are performed and may be based on either the fair value of the account or the services provided.

Insurance commissions are received based on contracts with insurance companies which provide for a percentage of premiums to be paid to the Company in exchange for placement of policies with customers. The commissions generally relate to a period of one year or less. Under certain contracts, the Company may also assist with the claims processing, but this performance obligation is considered insignificant compared to the initial placement of the policy. As such, the performance obligation is considered to have been substantially satisfied at the time of policy placement. While this indicates that all related revenue would be appropriately accrued at policy inception, in some cases, recognition occurs over the policy period if received in installments from the insurance

company. In no cases would this deferral extend beyond 12 months and the effect is considered immaterial compared to recognition at the time of policy placement. The Company also receives commissions based on renewals of policies previously placed. However, additional work is required to process the renewals, resulting in future performance obligations to earn the related revenues. In addition, the occurrence of such renewals is not certain as initial policies are generally for one year or less and the fees earned are not determined until the time of renewal, based on underwriting at that time. As such, the Company has determined that accrual of income for future renewals is not appropriate.

Other non-interest income related to loans and deposits is earned when the specific transaction is processed, similar to service charges and fees.

Gain or loss on sale of other real estate is reported in non-interest expense and is netted with other real estate expenses. The Company records a gain or loss from the sale of other real estate when control of the property transfers to the buyer, which generally occurs at the time of an executed deed. When the Company finances the sale of other real estate to the buyer, the Company assesses whether the buyer is committed to perform their obligation under the contract and whether collectability of the transaction price is probable. Once these criteria are met, the other real estate is derecognized and the gain or loss on sale is recorded upon the transfer of control of the property to the buyer. In determining the gain or loss on the sale, the Company adjusts the transaction price and related gain or loss on sale if a significant financing component is present. As a result, the Company has concluded that ASC 606 will affect the decision to recognize or defer gains on sales of other real estate in circumstances where the Company has financed the sale.

Presented below is the condensed financial information as to financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Parent Company.

	2020		2019		2021		2020
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	31,970	$	2,991	$	25,063	$	31,970
Investment in Equity Bank		452,304		489,261		572,414		452,304
Investment in EBAC		3,915		3,837		3,538		3,915
Other assets		7,657		7,908		342		7,657
Total assets	$	495,846	$	503,997	$	601,357	$	495,846
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Bank stock loan	$	—	$	8,990	$	—	$	—
Subordinated debt		87,684		14,561		95,885		87,684
Interest payable and other liabilities		513		2,386		4,841		513
Total liabilities		88,197		25,937		100,726		88,197
Stockholders’ equity		407,649		478,060		500,631		407,649
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	495,846	$	503,997	$	601,357	$	495,846

	2020			2019			2018			2021			2020			2019
Dividends from Equity Bank	$	7,500		$	23,000		$	30,500		$	14,251		$	7,500		$	23,000
Other income		1			4			3			56			1			4
Total income		7,501			23,004			30,503			14,307			7,501			23,004
Expenses
Interest expense		3,924			1,905			1,918			6,261			3,924			1,905
Other expenses		2,536			2,254			3,358			3,450			2,536			2,254
Total expenses		6,460			4,159			5,276			9,711			6,460			4,159
Income before income tax and equity in undistributed income (loss) of subsidiaries		1,041			18,845			25,227			4,596			1,041			18,845
Income tax benefit		1,504			1,081			1,025			1,551			1,504			1,081
Income before equity in undistributed income (loss) of subsidiaries		2,545			19,926			26,252			6,147			2,545			19,926
Equity in undistributed income (loss) of Equity Bank		(77,143	)		5,978			9,681			46,710			(77,143	)		5,978
Equity in undistributed income (loss) of EBAC		(372	)		(325	)		(108	)		(377	)		(372	)		(325	)
Net income (loss) and net income (loss) allocable to common stockholders	$	(74,970	)	$	25,579		$	35,825		$	52,480		$	(74,970	)	$	25,579

	2020			2019			2018			2021			2020			2019
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income (loss)	$	(74,970	)	$	25,579		$	35,825		$	52,480		$	(74,970	)	$	25,579
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:
Stock based compensation		3,473			2,870			2,509			2,906			3,473			2,870
Equity in undistributed (income) loss of Equity Bank		77,143			(5,978	)		(9,681	)		(46,710	)		77,143			(5,978	)
Equity in undistributed (income) loss of EBAC		372			325			108			377			372			325
Net amortization of purchase valuation adjustments		388			301			292			485			388			301
Net change in:
Other assets		(300	)		(4,092	)		(4,092	)		6,965			(300	)		(4,092	)
Interest payable and other liabilities		(4,524	)		(147	)		(50	)		(207	)		(4,524	)		(147	)
Net cash from (to) operating activities		1,582			18,858			24,911			16,296			1,582			18,858
Cash flows (to) from investing activities
Purchase stock of Eastman, net of holding company cash acquired	—			—				(55	)
Purchase stock of KBC, net of holding company cash acquired	—			—				(14,151	)
Purchase stock of Adams, net of holding company cash acquired	—			—				(4,179	)
Purchase assets of City Bank, net of liabilities assumed	—			—				(18,900	)
Proceeds from sales, calls, pay-downs and maturities of AFS securities											376		—			—
Purchase of net assets of ASBI, net of cash acquired											(8,209	)	—			—
Additional investment in Equity Bank		(17,200	)	—			—				—			(17,200	)	—
Additional investment in EBAC		(450	)		(900	)		(3,370	)		—			(450	)		(900	)
Net cash (used in) investing activities		(17,650	)		(900	)		(40,655	)		(7,833	)		(17,650	)		(900	)
Cash flows (to) from financing activities
Borrowings on bank stock loan		38,354			7,209			22,500			—			38,354			7,209
Principal payments on bank stock loan		(47,344	)		(13,669	)		(9,550	)		—			(47,344	)		(13,669	)
Borrowings on subordinated debt		75,000			—			—			—			75,000			—
Subordinated debt issue cost		(2,265	)		—			—			(16	)		(2,265	)		—
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options		20			371			133			3,847			20			371
Principal payments on employee stock loan		34			44			—			43			34			44
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan		596			405			—			569			596			405
Purchase of treasury stock		(19,348	)		(10,867	)		—			(18,664	)		(19,348	)		(10,867	)
Dividends paid on common stock											(1,149	)	—			—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		45,047			(16,507	)		13,083			(15,370	)		45,047			(16,507	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		28,979			1,451			(2,661	)		(6,907	)		28,979			1,451
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		2,991			1,540			4,201			31,970			2,991			1,540
Ending cash and cash equivalents	$	31,970		$	2,991		$	1,540		$	25,063		$	31,970		$	2,991

Kansas	72-1532188
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

7701 East Kellogg Drive, Suite 300 Wichita, KS	67207
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of exchange on which registered
Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share	EQBK	~~NASDAQ~~The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

Large accelerated filer☐	Accelerated filer☒
Non-accelerated filer☐	Smaller reporting company☐
	Emerging growth company☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.☐

		Shares outstanding as of February 28, ~~2021~~2022
Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share		~~14,448,847~~16,660,372
Class B Non-Voting Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share		0


Part I

Item 1.	Business	3

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	22

Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	48

Item 2.	Properties	48

Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	5152

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	5152

Part II

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	5253

Item 6.	~~Selected Financial Data~~Reserved	5557

Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	5758

Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk	8786

Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	8988

	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-1

	Consolidated Balance Sheets	~~F-4~~F-5

	Consolidated Statements of Income	~~F-5~~F-6

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	~~F-6~~F-7

	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity	~~F-7~~F-8

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	~~F-8~~F-9

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	~~F-10~~F-11

Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	9088

Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	9088

Item 9B.	Other Information	9089

Item 9C.	Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspection	89

Part III

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	9190

Item 11.	Executive Compensation	9190

Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	9190

Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	9190

Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	9190

Part IV

Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	9291

Item 16.	Form 10-K Summary	93

Address		Owned/Leased

Principal Executive Office and Wichita Branch:
7701 East Kellogg Drive Wichita, Kansas 67207		Owned

Other Wichita Area Branches:
345 North Andover Road Andover, Kansas 67002		Owned
1555 North Webb Road Wichita, Kansas 67206		Owned
10222 West Central Wichita, Kansas 67212 133 East 7^th Avenue Augusta, Kansas 67010 107 North Rose Hill Road Rose Hill, Kansas 67133 3313 North Ridge Road Wichita, Kansas 67205		Owned Owned Owned Owned

Kansas City Branches:
6200 Northwest 63^rd Terrace Kansas City, Missouri 64151		Owned
8880 West 151^st Street Overland Park, Kansas 66221		Owned
7035 College Boulevard Overland Park, Kansas 66207		Owned
909 Northeast Rice Road Lee’s Summit, Missouri 64086		Owned
301 Southeast Main Street Lee’s Summit, Missouri 64063		Owned
1251 Southwest Oldham Parkway Lee’s Summit, Missouri 64081		Owned
651 Northeast Coronado Drive Blue Springs, Missouri 64014		Owned

Tulsa Branches:

Address		Owned/Leased
9292 South Delaware Ave Tulsa, Oklahoma 74137		Owned

Western Missouri Branches:
1919 Highway 13 Higginsville, Missouri 64037		Owned
300 South Miller Street Sweet Springs, Missouri 65351		Owned

~~Address~~		~~Owned/Leased~~
612 North Maguire Warrensburg, Missouri 64093		Owned
200 North State Street Knob Noster, Missouri 65336		Owned
920 Thompson Boulevard Sedalia, Missouri 65301		Owned
504 West Benton Street Windsor, Missouri 65360		Owned
615 East Ohio Street Clinton, Missouri 64735		Owned
100 East Main Street Warsaw, Missouri 65355 602 Edmond Street Saint Joseph, Missouri 64501 5348 Lake Avenue Saint Joseph, Missouri 64504 401 North Woodbine Road Saint Joseph, Missouri 64506		Owned Owned Owned Owned

Topeka Branches:
701 South Kansas Avenue Topeka, Kansas 66603		Owned
507 West 8^th Street Topeka, Kansas 66603		Owned
3825 Southwest 29^th Street Topeka, Kansas 66614		Owned

Western Kansas Branches:
2428 Vine Street Hays, Kansas 67601		Owned
916 Washington Street Ellis, Kansas 67637		Owned
745 Main Street Hoxie, Kansas 67740		Owned
300 Highway 212 Quinter, Kansas 67752		Owned

Address		Owned/Leased
106 South Adams Street Grinnell, Kansas 67738		Owned
302 East Holme Norton, Kansas 67654		Owned
500 Main Street Almena, Kansas 67622		Owned

Southeast Kansas Branches:
902 McArthur Rd Coffeyville, Kansas 67337		Owned
112 East Myrtle Street Independence, Kansas 67301		Owned
801 Main Neodesha, Kansas 66757		Owned

~~Address~~		~~Owned/Leased~~
102 North Broadway Street Pittsburg, Kansas 66762		Owned

Southwest Kansas Branches:
502 South Jackson Street Hugoton, Kansas 67951		Owned
1700 North Lincoln Avenue Liberal, Kansas 67901		Owned
23 West 4^th Street Liberal, Kansas 67901		Owned
930 South Kansas Avenue Liberal, Kansas 67901		Owned

Address		Owned/Leased
250 East Tucker Road Liberal, Kansas 67901 1901 East Mary Street Garden City, Kansas 67846 401 North Henderson Street Holcomb, Kansas 67851 Central Kansas Branches: 1321 Main Street Great Bend, Kansas 67530 725 McKinley Street Great Bend, Kansas 67530 320 Broadway Larned, Kansas 67550 234 North Main Macksville, Kansas 67557 216 North Main St. John, Kansas 67576 North Central Kansas Branches: 1404 28^th Street Belleville, Kansas 66935 413 Washington Clyde, Kansas 66938 302 West Sixth Street Concordia, Kansas 66901 1661 South Ohio, Suite D Salina, Kansas 67401		Leased Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Leased

317 South Santa Fe Avenue Salina, Kansas 67401 Northern Arkansas Branches:		Owned
200 East Ridge Avenue Harrison, Arkansas 72601		Owned
1304 Highway 62/65 North⁽¹⁾ Harrison, Arkansas 72601		Leased
911 West Trimble Avenue Berryville, Arkansas 72616		Owned
107 West Van Buren Eureka Springs, Arkansas 72632		Leased
198 Slack Street Pea Ridge, Arkansas 72751		Owned

Northern Oklahoma Branches:

Address		Owned/Leased
222 East Grand Avenue Ponca City, Oklahoma 74601		Leased
802 East Prospect Avenue Ponca City, Oklahoma 74601		Owned
1417 East Hartford Avenue Ponca City, Oklahoma 74604		Leased
102 South Main Street Newkirk, Oklahoma 74647		Owned
110 East 1^st Street Cordell, Oklahoma 73632		Owned

Western Oklahoma Branches:
601 North Main Street Guymon, Oklahoma 73942		Owned
2602 North Highway 64 Guymon, Oklahoma 73942		Leased

	ASBI Acquisition
	Amount		Percent of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-interest-bearing demand	$	254,944		38.1	%
Interest-bearing demand and NOW accounts		95,023		14.2	%
Savings and money market		221,187		33.1	%
Time		97,695		14.6	%
Total deposits	$	668,849		100.0	%

	Security Acquisition
	Amount		Percent of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-interest-bearing demand	$	19,724		26.3	%
Interest-bearing demand and NOW accounts		13,713		18.3	%
Savings and money market		26,132		34.8	%
Time		15,509		20.6	%
Total deposits	$	75,078		100.0	%

	Almena Acquisition
	Amount		Percent of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-interest-bearing demand	$	11,737		18.8	%
Interest-bearing demand and NOW accounts		6,238		10.0	%
Savings and money market		5,835		9.3	%
Time		38,662		61.9	%
Total deposits	$	62,472		100.0	%

	MidFirst Acquisition
	Amount		Percent of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-interest-bearing demand	$	12,662		12.9	%
Interest-bearing demand and NOW accounts		11,538		11.7	%
Savings and money market		24,269		24.6	%
Time		50,074		50.8	%
Total deposits	$	98,543		100.0	%

(Dollars in thousands)	Federal funds purchased and retail repurchase agreements			FHLB Line of Credit
December 31, 2020:
Amount outstanding at year-end	$	36,029		$	—
Weighted average interest rate at year-end		0.22	%		—	%
Maximum month-end balance during the year	$	53,543		$	306,223
Average balance outstanding during the year	$	45,041		$	74,242
Weighted average interest rate during the year		0.23	%		1.42	%
December 31, 2019:
Amount outstanding at year-end	$	35,708		$	311,223
Weighted average interest rate at year-end		0.40	%		1.79	%
Maximum month-end balance during the year	$	45,575		$	429,925
Average balance outstanding during the year	$	42,459		$	262,615
Weighted average interest rate during the year		0.36	%		2.39	%
December 31, 2018:
Amount outstanding at year-end	$	50,068		$	368,770
Weighted average interest rate at year-end		0.28	%		2.65	%
Maximum month-end balance during the year	$	53,815		$	603,280
Average balance outstanding during the year	$	43,536		$	424,714
Weighted average interest rate during the year		0.25	%		2.09	%

	1 Year or Less		More Than 1 Year but Less Than 3 Years		3 Years or More but Less Than 5 Years		5 Years or More		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Standby and performance letters of credit	$	11,746	$	311	$	277	$	—	$	12,334
Commitments to extend credit		280,632		35,932		73,915		152,494		542,973
Total	$	292,378	$	36,243	$	74,192	$	152,494	$	555,307

	1 Year or Less		More Than 1 Year but Less Than 3 Years		3 Years or More but Less Than 5 Years		5 Years or More		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Certificates and other time deposits	$	456,542	$	149,580	$	20,123	$	609	$	626,854
Subordinated debentures		—		—		—		14,872		14,872
Subordinated notes		—		—		—		72,812		72,812
FHLB advances		2,357		4,714		3,036		—		10,107
Other contractual obligation commitments		3,436		1,662		17		74		5,189
Non-cancellable future operating leases		360		725		289		2,150		3,524
Total	$	462,695	$	156,681	$	23,465	$	90,517	$	733,358

Description		Page Number

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-1

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019~~2020		~~F-4~~F-5

Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018~~2019		~~F-5~~F-6

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018~~2019		~~F-6~~F-7

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018~~2019		~~F-7~~F-8

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018~~2019		~~F-8~~F-9

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		~~F-10~~F-11

	2020
	4th Quarter		3rd Quarter			2nd Quarter		1st Quarter
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Total interest and dividend income	$	39,989	$	37,082		$	37,933	$	40,557
Total interest expense		4,430		4,975			5,042		8,462
Net interest income		35,559		32,107			32,891		32,095
Provision for loan loss		1,000		815			12,500		9,940
Net interest income after provision for loan loss		34,559		31,292			20,391		22,155
Total non-interest income		8,500		6,485			5,732		5,306
Total non-interest expense⁽¹⁾		28,460		130,835			23,937		25,758
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		2,111		(2,653	)		497		445
Net income (loss) and net income (loss) allocable to common stockholders	$	12,488	$	(90,405	)	$	1,689	$	1,258
Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	0.85	$	(6.01	)	$	0.11	$	0.08
Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	0.84	$	(6.01	)	$	0.11	$	0.08

Exhibit No.		Description

3.1		Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Equity Bancshares, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 3, 2016).

3.2		Amended and Restated Bylaws of Equity Bancshares, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the SEC on October 9, 2015, File No. 333-207351).

4.1		Specimen Class A Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the SEC on October 27, 2015, File No. 333-207351).

4.2*		Description of Registrant’s Securities.

4.3		Indenture, dated as of June 29, 2020, by and between Equity Bancshares, Inc. and UMB Bank, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 2, 2020).

4.4		Form of 7.00% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Subordinated Note due 2030 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit ~~4.2~~4.1 to Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 2, 2020).

10.1†		Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the SEC on October 9, 2015, File No. 333-207351).

10.2†		Equity Bancshares, Inc. 2006 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the SEC on October 27, 2015, File No. 333-207351).

10.3†		Equity Bancshares, Inc. Amended and Restated 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed with the SEC on March 28, 2016).

10.4†*		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated November ~~14, 2016,~~1, 2021, between Equity Bank, Equity Bancshares, Inc. and Brad S. ~~Elliott (incorporated by reference~~Elliott. Exhibit is being refiled to ~~Exhibit 10.1~~include a corrected Appendix A to ~~Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with~~ the ~~SEC on November 15, 2016)~~agreement which inadvertently omitted certain information from the original filing.

Exhibit No.		Description

10.6		Loan and Security Agreement, dated January 28, 2016, by and between Equity Bancshares, Inc. and ServisFirst Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 3, 2016).

10.7		Amended Loan and Security Agreement, dated March 13, 2017, between Equity Bancshares, Inc. and ServisFirst Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 16, 2017).

10.8†		Equity Bancshares, Inc. Annual Executive Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed with the SEC on March 22, 2017).

10.9†		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated ~~December 15, 2014,~~November 1, 2021, between Equity Bank, Equity Bancshares, Inc. and Julie Huber (incorporated by reference to Exhibit ~~10.1~~10.4 to Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on ~~May 10, 2017)~~November 8, 2021).

10.10†		Form of Performance-vested Restricted Stock Units Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 5, 2018).

10.11†		Form of Time-vested Restricted Stock Units Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 5, 2018).

10.12†		Employment Agreement, dated ~~March 16, 2018,~~November 1, 2021, among Equity Bank and Craig L. Anderson, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit ~~10.1~~10.3 to Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s ~~Current~~Quarterly Report on Form ~~8-K,~~10-Q, filed with the SEC on ~~March 22, 2018)~~November 8, 2021).

10.13		Second Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated March 12, 2018. Between Equity Bancshares, Inc. and ServisFirst Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on November 9, 2018).

10.14		Third Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated March 11, 2019, Between Equity Bancshares, Inc. and ServisFirst Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 14, 2019).

10.15†		Equity Bancshares, Inc. 2019 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed with the SEC on March 22, 2019).

10.16†		Employment Agreement, dated April 30, 2020, by and between Equity Bank and Eric Newell, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 1, 2020).

10.17		Form of Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2020, by and among Equity Bancshares, Inc. and the several purchasers thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 2, 2020).

10.18		Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2020, by and among Equity Bancshares, Inc. and the several purchasers thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 2, 2020).

~~10.19~~		The Fourth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement and Promissory Notes Modification Agreement, dated June 29, 2020, by and among Equity Bancshares, Inc., as Borrower, and ServisFirst Bank, as Lender (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 2, 2020).

10.20†*Exhibit No.		Description
10.19† 10.20		Employment Agreement, dated ~~October~~November 1, ~~2018,~~2021, between Equity Bank, Equity Bancshares, Inc. and Brett A. ~~Reber.~~Reber (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on November 8, 2021). Fifth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated February 11, 2022, by and between Equity Bancshares, Inc. and ServisFirst Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Bancshares, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 18, 2022).

21.1*		List of Subsidiaries of Equity Bancshares, Inc.

23.1*		Consent of Crowe LLP

~~Exhibit~~ ~~No.~~		~~Description~~.

~~24.1~~24.1*		Powers of ~~Attorney (included on signature page).~~Attorney.

31.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of ~~2002.~~2002.

31.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of ~~2002.~~2002.

32.1**		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of ~~2002.~~2002.

32.2**		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of ~~2002.~~2002.

101.INS*		Inline XBRL Instance Document (the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document).

101.SCH*		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL*		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF*		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

101.LAB*		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE*		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

104*		Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).

EQUITY BANCSHARES, INC.

By:	/s/ Brad S. Elliott
Name:	Brad S. Elliott
Title:	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Date:	March 9, ~~2021~~2022


Signature	Title	Date


/s/ Brad S. Elliott	Chairman and	March 9, ~~2021~~2022
Brad S. Elliott	Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Eric R. Newell	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial	March 9, ~~2021~~2022
Eric R. Newell	Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ Gregory H. Kossover	Director, Executive Vice President and Chief	March 9, ~~2021~~2022
Gregory H. Kossover	Operating Officer

~~/s/ Gary C. Allerheiligen~~*	Director	March 9, ~~2021~~2022
Gary C. Allerheiligen


~~/s/ James L. Berglund~~*	Director	March 9, ~~2021~~2022
James L. Berglund


~~/s/ Junetta M. Everett~~*	Director	March 9, ~~2021~~2022
Junetta M. Everett


~~/s/ Gregory L. Gaeddert~~*	Director	March 9, ~~2021~~2022
Gregory L. Gaeddert


~~/s/ Benjamen M. Hutton~~*	Director	March 9, ~~2021~~2022
Benjamen M. Hutton


~~/s/ R. Renee Koger~~*	Director	March 9, ~~2021~~2022
R. Renee Koger


~~/s/ Jerry P. Maland~~*	Director	March 9, ~~2021~~2022
Jerry P. Maland


~~/s/ Shawn D. Penner~~*	Director	March 9, ~~2021~~2022
Shawn D. Penner


~~/s/ Harvey R. Sorensen~~*	Director	March 9, ~~2021~~2022
~~Harvey R. Sorensen~~Leon H. Borck


*	Director	March 9, 2022
Kevin E. Cook

	•	~~Tested~~Testing the effectiveness of management’s ~~review controls over the determination of qualitative loss factor adjustments.~~
	•	~~Tested~~ internal controls over the ~~completeness~~Company’s significant model assumptions and ~~accuracy of the data used in~~judgments, loan segmentation, reasonable and supportable forecasts, qualitative ~~loss factor adjustments, as well as internal controls over the mathematical accuracy of management’s ALL calculation.~~

	•	~~Performed substantive testing procedures over management’s analysis supporting their determination of qualitative loss factor adjustments.~~
	•	~~Performed substantive procedures over the completeness and accuracy of the data used in qualitative loss factor~~ adjustments and ~~verified the mathematical accuracy of management’s ALL calculation.~~

Fair value of consideration:
Cash	$	8,442
Common Stock		84,747
	$	93,189
Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
Cash and due from banks	$	97,724
Federal funds sold		13,428
Available-for-sale securities		176,476
Bank-owned life insurance		16,986
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock		4,251
Loans		441,884
Premises and equipment		11,975
Core deposit intangibles		2,660
Other assets		15,164
Total assets acquired		780,548
Deposits		668,849
Federal funds purchased and retail repurchase agreements		12,906
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		14,409
Subordinated debt		7,732
Interest payable and other liabilities		5,661
Total liabilities assumed		709,557
Total identifiable net assets		70,991
Goodwill		22,198
	$	93,189

Non-Purchase Credit Deteriorated Loans	Loan Par Value		Non-Credit Rate Marks			Credit Marks in ACL			Purchase Price
Commercial real estate	$	98,774	$	(1,220	)	$	—		$	97,554
Commercial and industrial		63,249		(348	)		—			62,901
Residential real estate		37,919		(153	)		—			37,766
Agricultural real estate		58,632		(1,474	)		—			57,158
Agricultural		56,238		(267	)		—			55,971
Consumer		15,832		(13	)		—			15,819
Total non-PCD loans		330,644		(3,475	)		—			327,169
Purchase Credit Deteriorated Loans
Commercial real estate		95,812		(956	)		(3,719	)		91,137
Commercial and industrial		2,017		(7	)		(60	)		1,950
Residential real estate		2,842		(347	)		(244	)		2,251
Agricultural real estate		10,424		(240	)		(421	)		9,763
Agricultural		10,693		(148	)		(1,113	)		9,432
Consumer		243		(6	)		(55	)		182
Total PCD loans		122,031		(1,704	)		(5,612	)		114,715
Total loans	$	452,675	$	(5,179	)	$	(5,612	)	$	441,884


Commercial real estate	$	61
Residential real estate		1,116
Consumer		188
Total acquired loans	$	1,365

December 31, 2021	Right-of-Use Asset		Lease Liability		Weighted Average Lease Term in Years		Weighted Average Discount Rate
Operating leases
Land and building leases	$	5,963	$	5,928		13.3		2.30	%
Total operating leases	$	5,963	$	5,928		13.3		2.30	%

	December 31, 2021		December 31, 2020
Interest Bearing Demand
Reciprocal	$	52,173	$	256,037
Total interest-bearing demand		52,173		256,037
Savings and money market
Reciprocal		308,374		23,733
Total saving and money market		308,374		23,733
Time
Reciprocal		2,969		14,857
Non-reciprocal brokered		10,000		—
Total time		12,969		14,857
Total reciprocal and brokered deposits	$	373,516	$	294,627

December 31, 2019		Outstanding Balance				Weighted Average Rate
Bank stock loan		$	8,990				4.75	%

December 31, 2021	Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at beginning of year		751,333		$	22.89		5	$	2,790
Granted		4,163			22.08		10		—
Exercised		(247,895	)		15.52		2		—
Forfeited or expired		(28,760	)		33.13		7		—
Outstanding at end of year		478,841		$	26.08		5	$	3,889
Fully vested and expected to vest		478,841		$	26.08		5	$	3,889
Exercisable at end of year		437,801		$	25.49		5	$	3,806