UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2023

OR

For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2017
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 000-53482

 

TEXAS MINERAL RESOURCES CORP.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

Delaware87-0294969
(State of other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
  
516 South Spring Avenue539 El Paso Street 
Tyler, Sierra Blanca, Texas7570279851
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)
(361) 790-5831
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code)

 

(361) 790-5831

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code)

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:None

 

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:Common Stock, par value $0.01

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes No

 

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No

 

Indicate by checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filerAccelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company 

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes No

 

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: As of December 1, 2017February 28, 2023 the aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $6,492,839$59,917,619 based upon the closing sale price of the common stock as reported by the OTCQX.US. For purposes of this calculation, shares of common stock held by executive officers, directors and holders of greater than 10% of the registrant’s outstanding common stock are assumed to be affiliates of the registrant. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.OTCQB.

 

The number of shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding as of December 11, 2017November 21, 2023 was 44,941,532.73,784,810

 

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PRELIMINARY NOTES1
GLOSSARY OF TERMS1
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS3
PART I5
ITEM 1.BUSINESS56
ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS1814
ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS3827
ITEM 1C.CYBERSECURITY27
ITEM 2.PROPERTIES3827
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS6132
ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES6132
PART II62
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES6233
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATARESERVED6634
ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS6634
ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK7237
ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATAF-138
ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE7356
ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES7356
ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION7457
ITEM 9CDISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS57
PART III75
ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE7558
ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION8563
ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS8865
ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE9366
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES9366
PART IV96
ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES9668
ITEM 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY70
SIGNATURES9971

 

 

 

PRELIMINARY NOTES

As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”), references to “Texas Mineral”, “the Company,” “we,” “our,” “us” or “TMRC” mean Texas Mineral Resources Corp. and its predecessors, as the context requires.

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

GLOSSARY OF TERMS
AlterationAny physical or chemical change in a rock or mineral subsequent to its formation.
BrecciaConcessionA rock in which angular fragments are surrounded by a mass of fine-grained minerals.
ConcessionA grant of a tract of land made by a government or other controlling authority in return for stipulated services or a promise that the land will be used for a specific purpose.
CoreThe long cylindrical piece of a rock, about an inch in diameter, brought to the surface by diamond drilling.
Diamond drillingA drilling method in which the cutting is done by abrasion using diamonds embedded in a matrix rather than by percussion. The drill cuts a core of rock, which is recovered in long cylindrical sections.
DriftA horizontal underground opening that follows along the length of a vein or rock formation as opposed to a cross-cut which crosses the rock formation.
ExplorationWork involved in searching for ore, usually by drilling or driving a drift.
Exploration expendituresCosts incurred in identifying areas that may warrant examination and in examining specific areas that are considered to have prospects that may contain mineral deposit reserves.
GradeGeophysicsExploration techniques employing such indirect methods as gravity and electro-magnetism.
GLOTexas General Land Office.
GradeThe average assay of a ton of ore, reflecting metal content.
Host rockHREEThe rock surrounding an ore deposit.Heavy rare earth element(s).
IntrusiveA body of igneous rock formed by the consolidation of magma intruded into other rocks, in contrast to lavas, which are extruded upon the surface.
LodeA mineral deposit in solid rock.
OreMine developmentThe work carried out for the purpose of opening up a mineral deposit and making the actual ore extraction possible.
MineralA naturally occurring homogeneous substance having definite physical properties and chemical composition, and if formed under favorable conditions, a definite crystal forms.
MineralizationThe presence of minerals in a specific area or geological formation.
Mineral ReserveThat part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. Reserves are customarily stated in terms of “Ore” when dealing with metalliferous minerals.
OreThe naturally occurring material from which a mineral or minerals of economic value can be extracted profitably or to satisfy social or political objectives. The term is generally but not always used to refer to metalliferous material, and is often modified by the names of the valuable constituent; e.g., iron ore.
Ore bodyA continuous, well-defined mass of material of sufficient ore content to make extraction economically feasible.
Mine developmentThe work carried out for the purpose of opening up a mineral deposit and making the actual ore extraction possible.

 


MineralA naturally occurring homogeneous substance having definite physical properties and chemical composition, and if formed under favorable conditions, a definite crystal forms.
 1 

MineralizationOre ShootThe presenceA zone or area within a vein that contains ore of minerals in a specific area or geological formation.economic grade.
Mineral ReservePEAThat part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. Reserves are customarily stated in terms of “Ore” when dealing with metalliferous minerals.Preliminary economic assessment.
Probable (Indicated) ReservesReserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven (measured) reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling, and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven (measured) reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation.
ProspectA mining property, the value of which has not been determined by exploration.
Proven (Measured) ReservesReserves for which (i) (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes;holes and (b) grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling and (b)(ii) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are well-established.
TonneREERare earth element(s).
REORare earth oxide(s).
Round Top, RTMD or Round Top Mountain DevelopmentRound Top Mountain Development, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, which is the entity that owns the Round Top Project.
Round Top Project

The Round Top Project is owned by Round Top and includes the following that were assigned by the Company to Round Top in May 2021:

●     two leases with the GLO, executed in September 2011 and November 2011, that each expire in 2030, to explore and develop a 950 acre rare earths project located in Hudspeth County, Texas;

●     the 54,990 acre surface lease, known as the West Lease, that provides unrestricted surface access for the potential development and mining of the Round Top Project;

●     an option to purchase from the GLO the surface rights covering approximately 5,670 acres over the mining lease and additional acreage adequate to the site to handle potential heap leaching and processing operations as currently anticipated at the Round Top Project; and

●     a ground water lease securing the right to develop the ground-water within a 13,120-acre lease area located approximately 4 miles from Round Top, containing five existing water wells. 

TonneA metric ton which is equivalent to 2,200 pounds.
TrendA general term for the direction or bearing of the outcrop of a geological feature of any dimension, such as a layer, vein, ore body, or fold.
Unpatented mining claimA parcel of property located on federal lands pursuant to the General Mining Law and the requirements of the state in which the unpatented claim is located, the paramount title of which remains with the federal government. The holder of a valid, unpatented lode-mining claim is granted certain rights including the right to explore and mine such claim.
VeinA mineralized zone having a more or less regular development in length, width, and depth, which clearly separates it from neighboring rock.

 


2

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). Such forward-looking statements concern with respect to the Company’s anticipated results and developments in the Company’s operations, in future periods, planned exploration and development of its properties, plans related to its business, and other matters that may occur in the future. These statements relate to analyses and other information that are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions of management.

Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, anticipations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, “plans”, “estimates” or “intends”, or stating that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report include, but are not limited to:

the progress, potential and uncertainties of our 2017-2018the rare-earth exploration programplans at our Round Top Project, located near Sierra Blanca,project in Hudspeth County, Texas (the “Round Top Project” or “Round Top”);

cost and timing for Pre-Feasibility Studya completed feasibility study, if any, for ourthe Round Top ProjectProject;

the success of gettingobtaining the necessary permits for future Round Top drill programs and future project exploration;development;

success, if any, of RTMD in developing the Round Top Project, including without limitation raising sufficient capital to fund any development;

expectations regarding theour ability to raise capital and to continue our exploration plans on our properties; andproperties (either to fund our proportionate expenditures in the Round Top Project as a member of RTMD or otherwise);

ability to complete a preliminary feasibility study;

plans regarding anticipated expenditures at the Round Top Project.Project and ability, if any, to fund anticipated Company expenditures; and

plans to enter into a joint venture agreement with Santa Fe and our ability to fund such potential exploration and development project.

Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation:

risks of being classified as an “exploration stage” company for purposes of SEC Regulation S-K Item 1300;

risks associated with our ability to continue as a going concern;concern in future periods;

risks associated with our history of losses and need for additional financing;

risks associated with our limited operating history;ability to raise capital on acceptable terms, if at all;

risks associated with our properties all being in the exploration stage;operating history;

risks associated with owning a membership interest in Round Top which may be diluted (which could be significant) if we are unable to fund our cash call obligations and elect to dilute our ownership interest in Round Top in lieu of funding our cash calls per the amended RTMD Operating Agreement (as of the filing date of this Annual Report, our membership interest is 19.611%);

risks associated with our properties;

risks associated with the lack of history in producing metals from our properties;the Round Top Project;

 3risks associated with a shortage of equipment and supplies;

risks associated with our need for additional financing to fund our cash call obligations with respect to Round Top, as well as the requirement in general for additional capital to further develop, a producing mine, if warranted;the Round Top Project;

risks associated with dilution of our Round Top membership interest due to the inability to fund our cash calls;

risks associated with owing a minority interest in Round Top;

risks associated with exploration activities not being commercially successful;successful (as there is no assurance that Round Top will be commercially successful);

risks associated with ownership of surface rights at ourand other title issues with respect to the Round Top Project;

risks associated with increased costs affecting our financial condition;

risks associated with a shortage of equipment and supplies adversely affecting ourthe ability to operate;operate properties;

risks associated with mining and mineral exploration being inherently dangerous;

risks associated with mineralization estimates;

risks associated with changes in mineralization estimates affecting the economic viability of ourthe properties;

risks associated with uninsured risks;

risks associated with mineral operations being subject to market forces beyond our control;

risks associated with fluctuations in commodity prices;

risks associated with permitting, licenses and approval processes;

risks associated with the governmental and environmental regulations;

risks associated with future legislation regarding the mining industry and climate change;

risks associated with potential environmental lawsuits;

risks associated with our land reclamation requirements;

risks associated with rare earth and beryllium mining in general presenting potential health risks;

risks related to title in our properties;

risks related to competition in the mining and rare earth elements industries;


risks related to economic conditions;macroeconomic conditions, both in the United States and internationally, including without limitation inflation, high interest rates, and supply chain issues;

risks associated with cybersecurity threats, breaches, and disruptions associated therewith;

risks related to our ability to manage growth;

risks related to the potential difficulty of attracting and retaining qualified personnel;

risks related to our dependence on key personnel;

risks related to conducting our business in order to be excluded from the definition of an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940;

risks related to global hostilities, both in Ukraine and the Middle East;

risks related to cybersecurity threats;

risks related to our United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) filing history; and

risks related to our securities.

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect the Company’s forward-looking statements. Some of the important risks and uncertainties that could affect forward-looking statements are described further under the section headings “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Annual Report. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, believed, estimated or expected. The Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Except as required by law, the Company disclaims any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.We qualify all the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report by the foregoing cautionary statements.

In light of these risks and uncertainties, many of which are described in greater detail elsewhere in this Annual Report, there can be no assurance that the events predicted in forward-looking statements contained in the Annual Report will in fact transpire.

An investment in our Common Stock involves significant risks, including the risk of a loss of your entire investment. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described herein before purchasing our Common Stock. The risks set forth herein are not the only ones facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties may exist and others could arise that could also adversely affect our business, financial condition, operations and prospects. If any of the risks set forth herein actually materialize, our business, financial condition, prospects and operations would suffer. In such event, the value of our Common Stock would decline, and you could lose all or a substantial portion of your investment.

 


PART I

ITEM 1.BUSINESS

Corporate Organization and HistoryITEM 1. BUSINESS

We were incorporated in the State of Nevada in 1970 as Standard Silver Corporation. In July 2004, our Articles of Incorporation were amended and restated to increase the number of shares of common stock to 25,000,000, and in March 2007, we affected a 1 for 2 reverse stock split. In September 2008, we amended and restated our Articles of Incorporation to: (i) increase of the number of shares of common stock from 25,000,000 to 100,000,000; and to (ii) authorize an additional 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, to be issued at management’s discretion. In September 2010, we amended our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to change our name from Standard Silver Corporation to Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp.

On August 24, 2012, we changed our state of incorporation from the State of Nevada to the State of Delaware (the “Reincorporation”) pursuant to a plan of conversion dated August 24, 2012. The Reincorporation was previously submitted to a vote of, and approved by, our stockholders at a special meeting of the stockholders held on April 25, 2012.

On March 14, 2016, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to amend its Certificate of Incorporation to change the name of the Company from “Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp” to “Texas Mineral Resources Corp”. The amendment became effective on March 21, 2016. The Certificate of Amendment did not make any other amendments to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation.

Our common stock is traded on the OTCQX U.S. operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. under the symbol “TMRC.” The market for our common stock on the OTCQX U.S. is extremely limited, sporadic and highly volatile.

Our fiscal year-end is August 31.

Narrative Description of Business

We are a mining company engaged in the business of the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties. We currently holdown a 19.611% membership interest in Round Top, which entity holds two nineteen yearmineral property leases executed in September 2011 and November 2011 respectively,with the GLO to explore and develop a 950 acre950-acre rare earths project located in Hudspeth County, Texas, known as the Round Top Project. WeThe leases expire in 2030 with provisions for automatic renewal if Round Top is producing in paying quantities (the receipt from the sale of materials exceeds all costs and expenses associated therewith for the prior 12 months). Round Top also haveholds prospecting permits covering 9,345 acres adjacent to the Round Top Project. Our principal focusProject and other related assets. The strategy with Round Top is on developingto develop a metallurgical process to concentrate or otherwise extract the metals from the Round Top Project’s rhyolite, although we will continue to examine other opportunities in the region as they develop. We currently have limited operationsconduct additional engineering, design, geotechnical work, and have not established that any of our projects or properties contain any Proven or Probable Reserves under SEC Industry Guide 7 (“Guide 7”).

On November 8, 2011, we announced that our supplementary operating plan to expand exploration activities at our Round Top Project had been approved by the Texas General Land Office (GLO); the expanded development and exploration drill plan calledpermitting necessary for an additional 40 drill holes and 4 diamond core holes for an estimated planned drilled footage of 20,000 feet. The program included 4,000 feet of Core drilling to establish a high level of confidence in the mineralization, provide physical engineering data and additional metallurgical sample. During 2011-2012 the permits were amended and there were 41,765 feet of reverse circulation drilling and 1,294.5 feet of core drilling done on Round Top.


On March 20, 2012, we submitted for approval an updated plan of operations. The updated plan of operations consisted of the reclassification of the drilling program through to abankable feasibility study into three phases. Phase 1 consists of 25 drill locations, phase 2 consists of 41 drill locations and phase 3 consists of 27 drill locations all located onthen to extract mineral resources from the Round Top Project. The planRound Top Project has not established as of operations also included two locationsthe date hereof that any of the properties contain any probable mineral reserves or proven mineral reserves under Item 1300 of Regulation S-K.

Rare earth elements are a group of chemically similar elements that usually are found together in nature – they are referred to as the “lanthanide series.” These individual elements have a variety of characteristics that are critical in a wide range of technologies, products, and applications and are critical inputs in existing and emerging applications. Without these elements, multiple high-tech technologies would not be possible. These technologies include:

cell phones,

computer and television screens,

battery operated vehicles,

clean energy technologies, such as hybrid and electric vehicles and wind power turbines,

fiber optics, lasers and hard disk drives,

numerous defense applications, such as guidance and control systems and global positioning systems, and

advanced water treatment technology for use in industrial and military.

Because of these applications, global demand for 100 ton bulk sample collection for additional metallurgical tests. We have suspended this phase of physical explorationREE is projected to steadily increase due to continuing growth in existing applications and increased innovation and development atof new end uses. Interest in developing resources domestically has become a strategic necessity as there is limited production of these elements outside of China. Our ability to raise additional funds to continue to fund our participation interest in the Round Top Project pending developmentmay be impacted by, among other factors, future prices for REEs.

As a part of a metallurgical processour ongoing operations, we will occasionally investigate new mining opportunities. We may also incur expenses associated with our investigations. These costs are expensed as incurred until such time when we have agreements in place to extractpurchase such mining rights. See “Properties – Alhambra Project.”

Operations Update

USARE, the potentially marketable metals.

On June 22, 2012, we published our Preliminary Economic Assessment for ouroperating manager of the Round Top project, has advised TMRC that it continues to progress the Round Top Project entitled “NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessmenttoward operations. Over the last twelve months, Round Top achieved several major milestones including: (i) favorable breaker trials with the goal to increase mine throughput; (ii) favorable CIX separation trials for rare earth elements indicating that the CIX technology employed can extract commercial quality rare earths from the Round Top Project Sierra Blanca, Texas,” dated June 22, 2012, effective asore; and (iii) favorable membrane concentration trials. The USARE Round Top team continues its work to determine an efficient means of May 15, 2012 (the “PEA”).

On October 3, 2012, our management released updated economic projections relatedmanaging alumina content, adding gallium to various revisionsits output and is working with a major lithium company to maximize the proposed mine plan presentedvalue of the lithium content. USARE has advised the Company that it (i) currently expects that (A) a PFS reflecting this work should be completed during calendar 2024 and (B) a small manufacturing unit should be established to begin processing Round Top Project ore in calendar 2025, and (ii) believes that Round Top remains an attractive venture and is in the PEA.process of updating the Round Top Project economic model.

History of the Round Top Project

In 2011, the Company entered into two leases with the GLO to explore and develop the Round Top Project, which leases were transferred to Round Top in 2021.

 

On

In March 6, 2013, we purchased the 54,990 acre surface lease atcovering the Round Top Project, known as the West Lease, from the Southwest Wildlife and Range Foundation (the “Foundation”(“Foundation”) for $500,000 cash and the issuance of 1,063,830 shares of our common stock. We alsoCommon Stock and agreed to support the Foundation through an annual payment of $45,000 for ten years to support conservation efforts within the Rio Grande Basin and in particular engaging in stewardship of Lake Amistad, a large and well-known fishing lake near Del Rio, Texas.Basin. The West Lease comprises approximately 54,990 acres. Most importantly, purchase ofprovides exclusive surface access to the surface lease gave us unrestricted surface accessarea for the potential development and mining of our Round Top Project. As of the date of this filing the $45,000 payments due in June 2016 and 2017 have not been paid; consequently, we have expensed the value of the West Lease during fiscal 2017. We fully intend to continue with the evaluation of the mineral potential of the property, to ultimately mine the property, and to bring the lease current when funds are available. Expensing the value of the West Lease does not restrict our access to the mineral leases.

On May 8, 2013, we released testing results by an independent laboratory of the leaching characteristic of the rhyolite at our Round Top Project, which demonstrates characteristics that may be favorable to heap leach mining at the Round Top Project. These leaching characteristics are described in greater detail below underWe transferred the section heading “Item 2. Properties –West lease to Round Top Project – Metallurgy”.in 2021.


On September 30, 2013 we released the results on column leach testing by an independent laboratory and announced our intention to issue a revised PEA based on a heap leach operation designed to produce approximately 2,500 tons per year of heavy rare earth elements plus yttrium. The column leach testing results are described in greater detail below under the section heading “Item 2. Properties – Round Top Project – Metallurgy”.

On December 23, 2013, we published a revised version of the June 2012 Preliminary Economic Assessment (the “Revised PEA”) based on a 20,000 tonne per day heap leach operation using a conventional element separation plant. The mineralized material estimate was recalculated to include uranium, niobium, tantalum and tin. The Revised PEA assesses the potential economic viability of the simplified and “scaled down” operation which we believe is a much better fit with the present rare earth market.

On September 8,In October 2014, we announced that we had completed an internal analysis suggesting that there is a reasonable possibility to adapt a lower volume staged growth approach to development of our Round Top project. The analysis indicated that an operation designed to produce a selected group of separated REE products in the range of 350-450 tonnes per year range, could potentially yield favorable mine economics. The goal of the proposed staged approach would be to increase mining rates if and when our products gained acceptability. The analysis suggested that capital needs in the Revised PEA could be proportionally reduced in relation to the lower volume initial stage. We are currently conducting a more detailed analysis of the relative capital expenses and operating expenses requirements of a scaled down processing plant with both solvent extraction and ion exchange processes under evaluation. We believe the lower capital requirements of a staged startup could offset any marginal increase in unit operating costs.

On October 29, 2014, we announced that we had executed agreements with the Texas General Land OfficeGLO securing the option to purchase the surface rights covering the potential Round Top projectProject mine and plant areas and, separately, a lease to develop the water necessary for the potential Round Top project mine operations.groundwater lease. The option to purchase the surface rights covers approximately 5,670 acres over the mining lease and we believe that the additional acreage should be adequate to site all potential heap leaching and processing operations as currently anticipated by the Company. WeRound Top. The option may exercise the optionbe exercised for all or part of the option acreage at any time during the sixteen year primary term of the mineral lease.lease as defined above. The “primary term” of the GLO mineral leases and the option is through August 2030. The option can be kept current by an annual payment of $10,000. The annual payment for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2017 has not been made as of the date of this filing. The purchase price will be the appraised value of the surface at the time of exercising the option.

The ground water lease secures ourthe right to develop the ground water within a 13,120 acre13,120-acre lease area located approximately 4 miles from the Round Top deposit. The lease area contains five existing water wells. It is anticipated that all potential water needs for the Round Top project mine operations would be satisfied by the existing wells covered by this water lease.Project. This lease has an annual minimum production payment of $5,000 prior to production of water for the operation. The minimum production payment for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2017 has not been made as of the date of this filing. After initiation of production we will paypayments of $0.95 per thousand gallons or $20,000 annually, whichever is greater.greater, is required. This lease remains effective as long as the mineral lease is in effect.

On February 24, 2015, we signed a letter of intent We transferred the option to form a joint venture with K-Technologies, Inc. (K-Tech), a chemical process developmentproduce the surface lease and applications company serving the minerals and chemicals industrieswater lease to develop, refine and market K-Tech’s Continuous Ion Exchange (CIX) and Continuous Ion Chromatography (CIC) technology as it applies primarily to the extraction of rare earth elements (REE) from native ores. The joint venture will license the technology to us, as well as other rare earth production companies. Subject to agreement by TMRC, the joint venture may also elect to build and operate processing facilities to separate and purify mixed rare earth concentrates into individual purified rare earth oxides for other rare earth production companies in addition to TMRC.

In early March 2015, we conducted a trial mining test during which we mined 500 tonnes of rhyolite, transported and crushed the ore to 80% passing a 1 ј inch screen. This rock is now stockpiled and will be used in the Stage 2 pilot plant development, as described in greater detail below under the section heading “Item 2. Properties – Round Top Project – Metallurgy”.in 2021.


On May 26, 2015, we announced that K-tech had successfully produced a low cerium concentrate solution employing their CIX/CIC process. This concentrate solution was separated from crushed Round Top rhyolite leached in 8 inch by 8 foot columns. If precipitated, dried and calcined, this concentrate would be salable in the present rare earth market. Neither uranium nor thorium was detected in the rare earth concentrate. Further test work has shown that it is possible to remove both uranium and thorium from the spent solution from the REE extraction plant. Production of the low cerium concentrate essentially completed Phase 2 of Stage 1 of our development process, with the production of final purified elemental oxides being the only step remaining to complete Phase 2 of Stage 1.

Cautionary Note

On April 6, 2015, we announced the execution of a uranium offtake agreement with UG USA, a subsidiary of Areva. According to the agreement, TMRC will supply up to 300,000 pounds of natural uranium concentrates (U308) per year based upon a pricing formula indexed to U308 spot prices at the times of delivery. The Agreement is for a term of five years commencing in 2018 or as soon thereafter, contingent upon development and production at its Round Top project. Other terms and conditions of the Agreement reflect industry standards. According to Ux Consulting, a leading uranium industry data provider, the closing spot price of U308 on March 30, 2015 was $39.50 per pound.


On July 15, 2015, we entered into an operating agreement (“Operating Agreement”) with K-Tech, to formalize our joint venture company, Reetech, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Reetech”), for the purposes of developing, refining and marketing K-Tech’s CIX/CIC process pursuant to the February 24, 2015 letter of intent with K-Tech. On October 18, 2015, we entered into an amendment agreement to the Operating Agreement, expanding the way in which we can earn percentage membership interests in Reetech in exchange for granting K-Tech changes in the management of Reetech and TMRC’s license from Reetech to use K-Tech’s CIX/CIC process for its properties.

The operating agreement between TMRC and K-Tech is still in effect, but due to the inactivity of our Round Top project, there has been no ongoing advancement under the operating agreement as of August 31, 2017.

See “Item 2. Properties – Metal Recovery Methods” for a more detailed description of the Reetech joint venture.

On September 25, 2015, we announced that Reetech was awarded a Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) research contract by the United States Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Strategic Materials Division. The Defense Logistics Agency is the Department of Defense’s largest logistics combat support agency, providing worldwide logistics support in both peacetime and wartime to the military services as well as several civilian agencies and foreign countries. The DLA Strategic Materials Division is charged with maintaining cognizance of worldwide strategic and critical material’s supply chain from the source to final assembly, evaluating the capability of these supply chains to support national defense and essential civilian industries, and developing mitigation solutions when access to materials are insufficient to provide support for national defense and emergency response.

Reetech will conduct research to demonstrate, at the bench scale level, the ability to separate and refine yttrium (Y) oxide to a minimum of 99.999% purity, ytterbium (Yb) oxide to a minimum of 99.99% purity and a third rare earth oxide, which is not being publicly disclosed, to a minimum 99.999% purity level, using continuous ion exchange (CIX) and continuous ion chromatography (CIC).

Cautionary Note to Investors:The PEA and Revised PEA have beendated August 16, 2019 was prepared in accordance with Canadian National Instrument 43-101 — Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (the “CIM”) —CIM Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, adopted by the CIM Council, as amended.The Company has voluntarily had the PEA and Revised PEA prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 but the Company is not subject to regulation by Canadian regulatory authorities and no Canadian regulatory authority has reviewed the PEA or Revised PEA or passed upon its accuracy or compliance with NI 43-101. The terms “mineral reserve”, “proven mineral reserve” and “probable mineral reserve” are Canadian mining terms as defined in accordance with NI 43-101. These definitions differ from the definitions in SEC Industry Guide 7Item 1300 of Regulation S-K under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Under SEC Industry Guide 7Item 1300 of Regulation S-K standards, a “final” or “bankable” feasibility study is required to report reserves, the three-year historical average price is used in any reserve or cash flow analysis to designate reserves and the primary environmental analysis or report must be filed with the appropriate governmental authority. In addition, the terms “mineral resource”, “measured mineral resource”, “indicated mineral resource” and “inferred mineral resource” arewhile defined in NI 43-101; however, these terms are not defined terms under SEC Industry Guide 743-101 and Item 1300 of Regulation S-K are normally not permitted to be used in reports and registration statements filed with the SEC. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves. “Inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists or is economically or legally mineable. Disclosure of “contained ounces” in a resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, the SEC normally only permits issuers to report mineralization that does not constitute “reserves” by SEC Industry Guide 7Item 1300 of Regulation S-K standards as in place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures. Accordingly, information in the PEA and Revised PEA contains descriptions of our mineral deposits that may not be comparable to similar information made public by United States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements under the United States federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. Our projectThe Round Top Project as described in the PEA and Revised PEA currently does not contain any known proven or probable oremineral reserves under SEC Industry Guide 7Item 1300 of Regulation S-K reporting standards. U.S. investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in the Registrant’s latest reports and registration statements filed with the SEC.U.S. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any defined resources in these categories will ever be converted into SEC Guide 7Item 1300 of Regulation S-K compliant reserves.

USA Rare Earth Agreement

In August 2018, the Company and Morzev Pty. Ltd. (“Morzev”) entered into an agreement (the “2018 Option Agreement”) whereby Morzev was granted the exclusive right to earn and acquire a 70% interest in the Round Top Project by financing $10 million of expenditures in connection with the Round Top Project, increasable to an 80% interest, for an additional $3 million payment to the Company. Morzev began engaging in business as USA Rare Earth and in May 2019 notified the Company that it was nominating USA Rare Earth, LLC (“USARE”) as the optionee under the terms of the 2018 Option Agreement. In August 2019, the Company and USARE entered into an amended and restated option agreement as further amended on June 29, 2020 (the “2019 Option Agreement” and collectively with the 2018 Option Agreement, the “Option Agreement”), whereby the Company restated its agreement to grant USARE the exclusive right to earn and acquire a 70% interest, increasable to an 80% interest, in the Round Top Project.

In May 2021, and in accordance with the terms of the Option Agreement, the Company and USARE entered into a contribution agreement (“Contribution Agreement”) whereby the Company and USARE contributed assets to Round Top, at the time a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, in exchange for their initial ownership interests in Round Top, of which the Company initially owned a membership interest equating to 20% of Round Top and USARE initially owned a membership interest equating to 80% of Round Top. Concurrently therewith, the Company and USARE as the two members entered into a limited liability company agreement (“Operating Agreement”) governing the operations of Round Top which contains customary and industry standard terms as contemplated by the Option Agreement. USARE serves as manager of Round Top.

 


Current

Upon entry into the Contribution Agreement, the Company assigned the following contracts and Planned Exploration Activitiesassets to Round Top in exchange for its initial 20% membership interest in Round Top:

the assignment and assumption agreement with respect to the mineral leases from the Company to Round Top;

 

Stage 1

the assignment and assumption agreement with respect to the surface lease from the Company to Round Top;

 

the assignment and assumption agreement with respect to the surface purchase option from the Company to Round Top;

the assignment and assumption agreement with respect to the water lease from the Company to Round Top; and

the bill of sale and assignment agreement of existing data and other relevant contracts and permits with respect to Round Top owned by the Company.

and USARE assigned the following assets to Round Top (or the Company, as applicable) for its initial 80% membership interest in Round Top:

cash to Round Top to continue to fund Round Top operations in the amount of approximately $3,761,750 comprising the balance of the $10 million required expenditure to earn a 70% interest in Round Top;

cash in the amount of $3 million to the Company upon exercise of the USARE option to acquire from the Company an additional 10% interest in Round Top, resulting in the aggregate ownership interest of 80% in Round Top;

bill of sale and assignment agreement of the Pilot Plant and other relevant contracts and permits to Round Top; and

bill of sale and assignment agreement of existing data and intellectual property owned by USARE to Round Top.

On June 26, 2023, the Company, USARE and the manager amended and restated the Operating Agreement and the following material amendments to the Operating Agreement were adopted:

Cash Calls.

On the basis of the adopted program and budget (sometimes referred to as the “Budget”) then in effect, the manager will submit to each member monthly cash calls at least 10 days before the last day of each month, and within 10 days of receipt, (a) USARE will pay to RTMD, as an additional capital contribution, its proportionate share of the estimated cash requirements based on its interest and (b) the Company will either (i) pay to RTMD, as an additional capital contribution, its proportionate share of the estimated cash requirements based on its interest, or (ii) deliver to RTMD a written notice indicating what amount, if any, of the applicable estimated cash requirements that the Company will contribute (the “Notice of Non-Contribution”). Failure by the Company to deliver payment of its proportionate share of the estimated cash requirements, as an additional capital contribution, or to deliver a Notice of Non-Contribution within the 10 day period shall automatically be considered a “Deemed Non-Contribution” and shall have the same effect as if the Company provided a timely Notice of Non-Contribution with respect to non-contribution of its entire proportionate share of the applicable cash call.

Remedies for Failure to Meet Cash Calls

Non-Contribution. Capital contributions only will be made to fund programs and budgets. If the Company does not contribute all or any portion of any additional capital contribution that it is required to contribute pursuant to a Notice of Non-Contribution or a Deemed Non-Contribution (such unfunded amount shall be deemed the “Shortfall Amount”), then USARE shall fund the entire Shortfall Amount within 5 business days after the Notice of Non-Contribution or Deemed Non-Contribution.

Dilution. Upon receiptthe contribution of adequatethe Shortfall Amount by USARE, the interests of the members will be recalculated based on the adjustment provision set forth below in the sub-heading “– Adjustment of Interests”.

Maximum Dilution. The dilution of the Company shall not fall below a 3% interest in RTMD (the “Minimum Percentage Interest”). Upon the contribution by USARE of a Shortfall Amount which otherwise would result in a dilution of the Company below the Minimum Percentage Interest, USARE will receive a priority distribution of available cash, in addition to a distribution of available cash to which USARE otherwise is entitled to receive as a result of its proportionate additional capital contribution pursuant to the applicable cash call request, up to the Shortfall Amount that would have resulted in the Company’s interest being further diluted but for the Minimum Percentage Interest (the “Priority Distribution”). The Priority Distribution will continue until USARE has been reimbursed for its contribution of the Shortfall Amount that would have resulted in the Company having an interest below the Minimum Percentage Interest, after which time the members shall receive distributions of available cash pro rata in proportion to their respective interests.

Adjustment of Interests.

If USARE contributes the Shortfall Amount, then the then current interest of the Company will be reduced (subject to the Minimum Percentage Interest), effective as of each cash call under an additional capital contribution for the applicable program and budget, by a fraction, expressed as a percentage:

the numerator of which equals the Shortfall Amount actually funded by USARE; and

the denominator of which equals the market capitalization of the Company.

For example, the dilution with respect to the December 2023 Round Top cash call notice that was sent on November 16, 2023 was calculated as follows: (A) the USARE ownership interest in Round Top at October 27, 2023 was 80.274% and the Company’s ownership interest in Round Top at October 27, 2023 was 19.726%; (B) the December 2023 Round Top cash call noticed on November 16, 2023 was for an aggregate amount of $726,188, of which $582,939 is to be contributed by USARE and $143,249 is to be contributed by the Company; (C) the Company provided a Notice of Non-Contribution stating that it will not contribute the $143,249 which then became the Shortfall Amount; (D) USARE will contribute its $582,939 plus the Shortfall Amount; and (E) the Company as of the date of the Notice of Non-Contribution had a market capitalization of $24,585,099. Accordingly, the Shortfall Amount equaled 0.583% of the Company’s market capitalization, and the Company’s percentage Interest in the Company was reduced to 19.611%.

Distributions

Cash in excess of authorized reserves will be distributed to the members pro-rata in proportion to their respective interests on a periodic basis as determined by the management committee. RTMD will be required to make tax distributions to each member. Once USARE has been paid the Priority Distribution, if applicable, all distributions made in connection with the sale or exchange of all or substantially all of RTMD’s assets and all distributions made in connection with the liquidation of RTMD will be made to the members pro-rata in accordance with their respective interests.

Other material terms of the Operating Agreement that remain unchanged are as follows:

Management.

A management committee will make the major decisions of RTMD, such as approval of the respective program and budget, and the manager will implement such decisions. The management committee consists of three representatives of the members, with two being appointed by USARE and one by the Company which is Dan Gorski. The representatives vote the ownership percentage interests of their appointing member.

Management Committee Meetings.

Meetings will be held every three months unless otherwise agreed. For matters before the management committee that require a vote, voting is by simple majority except for certain “major decisions” that require a unanimous vote. So long as the Company maintains a 15% or greater ownership interest, the nine decisions identified in the bullet points below require unanimous approval. If the Company’s ownership interest falls below 15%, the number of unanimous decisions is reduced to five (being the first five bullet points below). If the Company is acquired by a REE mining company or sells its ownership interest to a REE mining company, in each case who elects a majority of the Company’s board, this unanimous approval requirement can be suspended by USARE, at its option. The major decisions requiring unanimous approval, as set forth above, are:

approval of an amendment to any program and budget that causes the program and budget to increase by 15% or more, except for emergencies;

other than purchase money security interests or other security interests in RTMD equipment to finance the acquisition or lease of RTMD equipment used in operations, the consummation of a project financing or the incurrence by RTMD of any indebtedness for borrowed money that requires the guarantee by any member of any obligations of RTMD;

substitution of a member under certain circumstances and dissolution of RTMD;

the issuance of an ownership interest or other equity interest in RTMD, or the admission of any person as a new member of RTMD, other than in connection with the exercise of a right of first offer by a member;

the redemption of all or any portion of an ownership interest, except for limited circumstances provided for in the Operating Agreement;

a decision to grant authorization for RTMD to file a petition for relief under any chapter of the United States Bankruptcy Code, to consent to such relief in any involuntary petition filed against RTMD by any third party, or to admit in writing any insolvency of RTMD or inability to pay its debts as they become due, or to consent to any receivership of RTMD;

acquisition or disposition of significant mineral rights, other real property or water rights outside of the area of interest as set forth in the Operating Agreement or outside of the ordinary course of business;

the merger of RTMD into or with any other entity; and

the sale of all or substantially all of RTMD’s assets.

Manager.

The manager will manage, direct and control operations in accordance with program and budget, will prepare and present to the management committee a proposed program and budget, and will generally oversee and implement all of the day to day activities of RTMD. The manager will conduct necessary equipment and materials procurement and property and equipment maintenance activities, with all operations to be conducted in accordance with adopted program and budget.

Permitted Transfers.

Certain transfers are permitted under the Operating Agreement, including transfers to affiliates or through certain mergers or other forms of business reorganization. A member may also encumber its ownership interest provided that if the ownership interest is foreclosed upon, the other member has a pre-emptive right to acquire such ownership interest at the foreclosure sale. If the transfer is a “permitted transfer,” the transferee is automatically admitted as a member; otherwise unless the other member agrees, the transferee is only an economic interest holder with no voting or other rights held by a member.

Right of First Offer.

If a member desires to transfer all or a portion of its ownership interest to a third party (other than a permitted transfer), it may do that without the consent of the other member so long as it gives the other member the first right to purchase its ownership interest on the same terms. If the other member does not elect to purchase the ownership interest on such terms, the member may sell its ownership interest on such terms and the transfer will be a permitted transfer.

Drag-Along Right.

If USARE accepts a bona fide offer to purchase its entire ownership interest and all other rights under the Operating Agreement from an unrelated third party, the Company will then be obligated to sell its entire ownership interest and all other rights under the Operating Agreement to the unrelated third party on the same terms and conditions as are accepted by USARE.

Current Ownership in Round Top.

Pursuant to the Operating Agreement, USARE initially owned membership interests equating to 80% of Round Top and the Company initially owned membership interests equating to 20% of Round Top. These ownership interests have been and will be adjusted further under a variety of circumstances, including a decision by us not to fund in cash our portion of a Budget. USARE’s contribution of approximately $3,761,750 in cash to Round Top in May 2021 was used first to fund operations pursuant to the initial Budget. Currently, USARE and the Company are obligated, subject to an election by the Company not to fund in cash its portion of a Round Top cash call and in lieu thereof to incur dilution to its membership interests, to fund further expenditures in proportion to their respective ownership interests. We funded $386,400 in cash during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2023 and elected not to fund $448,800 which resulted in the dilution of our Round Top membership interest to 19.874% at August 31, 2023. Subsequent to September 1, 2023 through the date of this Annual Report, we plannotified USARE that we had elected not to completecontribute in cash our proportionate interest in aggregate cash calls of $396,249 which reduced our RTMD ownership interest to 19.611% as of the developmentdate of this Annual Report pursuant to the dilution mechanism in the June 2023 amended Operating Agreement. USARE has advised us that the preliminary estimate of the Round Top Budget for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2024, is currently anticipated to be between $15 million to $20 million, with the Company’s portion currently being estimated to be between $3 million to $4 million. It is possible that the Round Top Budget for the current fiscal year could increase and it should be expected that in future periods the Round Top Budget will be higher. The Company likely will decide to incur dilution to its then current membership interest in lieu of funding in cash its Round Top Budget obligations during this fiscal year, as it currently does not have sufficient capital to fund its currently expected cash calls and general and administrative expenses during the fiscal year ending August 31, 2024; consequently our ownership interest in the Round Top Project will likely be further diluted during this current fiscal year. In future periods, we will be required to raise additional capital to fund future cash calls from Round Top (unless we elect in lieu of making cash contributions to dilute our membership interest percentage, which dilution could be significant), and there can be no assurance that we will be able to raise the necessary capital to fund our Round Top cash calls. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

10 

Operations of the Round Top Project

During the fiscal year ending August 31, 2024, Round Top is currently anticipated to fund the expenditure of between $15 million to $20 million to optimize the leaching and developing of the CIX/CIC processing of the Round Top primary leach solution. The bench scale testing of thisProject. Initial process Stage 1, was divided into two phases. Phase 1, now completed, was to purify the primary leach solution and produce a concentrated, low flow rate feedstock suitable for further processing by CIX/CIC. Development has now progressed into Phase 2 which is to effect a separationdesign work will be carried out at USARE’s facility in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. Pending completion of the rare earth elements into groups for final refinement. In work completedinitial process development, this facility will either be relocated to date, we have producedor replicated at USARE’s Oklahoma facility where a concentrated solution from which we have removed the low value elements lanthanum and cerium. The resulting solution containing the high value rare earth elements could be precipitated into a marketable concentrate if so desired.

Work now is in progress to make the final purified elemental oxides, thereby completing Stage 1 bench scale testing. This work is being done in conjunction with the contract from the Defense Logistics Agency to produce the highly purified yttrium, ytterbium and other element products.


Stage 2

Stage 2 will consist of the pilot plant scale testing of the process proven most effective by Stage 1, and will consist of the work requiredis expected to bring the processing plant into full feasibility with capital and operating costsbe established. It is estimated to an accuracy range of 10 -15%. Stage 2 will also develop the heap leach procedure to pre-feasibility level with capital and operating estimated to an accuracy of 25 - 35%. Environmental base line studies and initial co-ordination with the Texas regulatory agencies will be included in this stage.

Stage 3

Stage 3 will bringthat the Round Top Project will require additional time and further expenditure to fullcomplete a bankable feasibility level with all electrical power and water needs developed, final engineering of heap leach systems, mine design and engineering, geotechnical drilling and construction planning, and permitting in place. Additional drilling to bring all ofstudy. As such, it is possible that the rock includedRound Top Budget will increase in the 20current fiscal year. In accordance with the current Round Top Budget, the Company does not have sufficient capital to fund its total cash calls (currently anticipated to be between $3 million to $4 million) and expected general and administrative expenses (of not less than $600,000) during the fiscal year pitending August 31, 2024; accordingly, we expect to a measured or indicated resourced category.incur dilution to our then current membership interest in lieu of funding our Round Top cash calls.

Trends – Rare-Earth MarketMarkets

Rare earth elements, (or “REEs”)or REEs, are a group of chemically similar elements that usually are found together in nature;nature – they are referred to as the “lanthanide series.” These individual elements have a variety of characteristics that are important in a wide range of technologies, products, and applications and are critical inputs in existing and emerging applications including: computer hard drives, cell phones, clean energy technologies, such as hybrid and electric vehicles and wind power turbines; multiple high-tech uses, including fiber optics, lasers and hard disk drives; numerous defense applications, such as guidance and control systems and global positioning systems; and advanced water treatment technology for use in industrial, military and outdoor recreation applications. As a result, global demand for REE is projected to steadily increase due to continuing growth in existing applications and increased innovation and development of new end uses. Interest in developing resources domestically has become a strategic necessity as there is limited production of these elements outside of China. Our ability, if any, to raise additional funds in order to completefund our plan of exploration and, if warranted, development at the Round Top Projectexpected cash calls in RTMD may be impacted by future prices for REEs.

Rare earth prices are extremely depressed at this time. It is thought that the liquidation of excessive inventories in China is causing these depressed prices. Chinese sources observe that most of the Chinese primary producers are not showing profit at this time. However, demand for rare earth products continues to grow at a healthy rate. We believe that the present prices will likely prevail for the next year at least until the surplus Chinese product is absorbed by the market.

Pricing for REEs has experienced significant volatility over the past several years, but current prices for all REEs remain significantly higher than pre-2010 levels, although they have fallen from the peak levels seen in 2011. According to www.metal-pages.com (“Metal-Pages”) REE prices increased from mid-2010 to mid-2011 approximately 2,000 to 3,000 percent, depending on the element, and then REE prices began decreasing through the end of 2011. REO prices of individual oxides increased considerably during the first two quarters of 2011 but declined thereafter through to the end of the year. Beginning in the second quarter of 2012, REE prices have decreased significantly for all REEs.

Pricing is affected by a number of factors, including the general health of the global economy, efforts to institute greater environmental reforms in China, industry consolidation, stockpile build-ups in China and by consumers and governments, lack of certainty regarding future REE production, development and continued use of REE technologies, potential oversupply, potential substitution of other metals, and potential for recycling REEs.


REE supply markets continue to be dominated by China, which produced an estimated 86% of the global REE production in 2012. IMCOA forecasts that global rare earth supply will increase to 180,000 mt in 2016, with China producing approximately 65% of that total. In relation to global REE demand, based on the IMCOA Report, REE total demand is forecasted to increase from 115,000 tonnes in 2012 to 162,500 tonnes in 2016. It is forecasted that the demand for REE will increase at a rate of eight to 10 percent per year for the next five to 10 years, but this is dependent on continued development and use of REEs in new technologies.

We plan on focusing primarily on so-called “heavy” rare earth elements (HREE). The supply market for HREEs is dominated by the Chinese who control approximately 99% of the market. In addition to the pricing influences mentioned above applicable to all REEs, pricing of HREEs in the future is expected to be highly influenced by China policies of HREE supply and China stockpile buildups.

Sources and Availability of Raw Materials

We areThe Round Top Project is currently in the exploration stage and as such we doRound Top does not require any significant raw materials in order to carry out ourits primary operating activities. Our primary operating objectiveThe goal of RTMD is to explorecontinue to fund the exploration and developdevelopment of the Round Top Project. For at least the next year, we expectProject to continue to require the usedetermine whether it is commercially feasible, of contract drilling services in order to obtain additional geological information. In the past year we have been able to secure contract drilling services without excessive delay and costs. We expect the contract drilling services will continue towhich there can be available over the next year.


no assurance. The raw materials that ourthe current operations of Round Top rely onupon are gasoline and diesel fuel for the exploration vehicles and for the heavy equipment required to build roads and conduct drilling operations. Water is expected to be provided per service contract by Eagle Mountain Gang which is used for the drilling operations.or through other sources.

Seasonality

Seasonality in the State of Texas is not a material factor to our operations for our project.

Competition

The mining industry is highly competitive. We competeRound Top competes with numerous companies, substantially all withof which have greater financial resources available to them. WeRound Top is, therefore, are operating at a significant disadvantage in the course of acquiring mining properties and obtaining materials, supplies, labor, and equipment. Additionally, Round Top is and we are and will continue to be an insignificant participant in the business of exploration and mineral property development. A large number of established and well-financed companies are active in the mining industry and will have an advantage over usRTMD and the Company if they are competing for the same properties. Nearly all such entities have greater financial resources, technical expertise and managerial capabilities than ourselves and, consequently, weRTMD and the Company will be at a competitive disadvantage in identifying possible mining properties and procuring the same.

China accounts for the vast majority of rare earth element production. While rare earth element projects exist outside of China, very few are in actual production. Further, given the timeline for current exploration projects to come into production, if at all, it is likely that the Chinese will be able to dominate the market for rare earth elements into the future. This gives the Chinese a competitive advantage in controlling the supply of rare earth elements and engaging in competitive price reductions to discourage competition. Any increase in the amount of rare earth elements exported from other nations, and increased competition, may result in price reductions, reduced margins and loss of potential market share, any of which could materially adversely affect our profitability.operations. As a result of these factors, weRTMD and the Company may not be able to compete effectively against current and future competitors.

Government Approvals

The exploration, drilling and mining industries operate in a legal environment that requires permits to conduct virtually all operations. Thus permits are required by local, state and federal government agencies. Local authorities, usually counties, also have control over mining activity. The various permits address such issues as prospecting, development, production, labor standards, taxes, occupational health and safety, toxic substances, air quality, water use, water discharge, water quality, noise, dust, wildlife impacts, as well as other environmental and socioeconomic issues.

11 

 

Prior to receiving the necessary permits to explore or mine, the operator must comply with all regulatory requirements imposed by all governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the project area. Very often, in order to obtain the requisite permits, the operator must have its land reclamation, restoration or replacement plans pre-approved. Specifically, the operator must present its plan as to how it intends to restore or replace the affected area. Often all or any of these requirements can cause delays or involve costly studies or alterations of the proposed activity or time frame of operations, in order to mitigate impacts. All of these factors make it more difficult and costly to operate and have a negative and sometimes fatal impact on the viability of the exploration or mining operation. Finally, itIt is possible that future changes in these laws or regulations could have a significant impact on our business as well as RTMD’s business, causing those activities to be economically reevaluated at that time.


Effect of Existing or Probable Government and Environmental Regulations

Mineral exploration, including mining operations are subject to governmental regulation. OurThe Round Top operations may be affected in varying degrees by government regulation such as restrictions on production, price controls, tax increases, expropriation of property, environmental and pollution controls or changes in conditions under which minerals may be marketed. An excess supply of certain minerals may exist from time to time due to lack of markets, restrictions on exports, and numerous factors beyond our control. These factors include market fluctuations and government regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, allowable production and importing and exporting minerals. The effect of these factors cannot be accurately determined, and we are not aware of any probable government regulations that would impact the Company.determined. This section is intended as a brief overview of the laws and regulations described herein and is not intended to be a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter.

Overview.Like all other mining companies doing business in the United States, we areRound Top is subject to a variety of federal, state and local statutes, rules and regulations designed to protect the quality of the air and water, and threatened or endangered species, in the vicinity of its operations. These include “permitting” or pre-operating approval requirements designed to ensure the environmental integrity of a proposed mining facility, operating requirements designed to mitigate the effects of discharges into the environment during exploration, mining operations, and reclamation or post-operation requirements designed to remediate the lands affected by a mining facility once commercial mining operations have ceased.


Federal legislation in the United States and implementing regulations adopted and administered by the Environmental Protection Agency, the Forest Service, the Bureau of Land Management, the Fish and Wildlife Service, the Army Corps of Engineers and other agencies—in particular, legislation such as the federal Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the Endangered Species Act, the National Forest Management Act, the Wilderness Act, and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act—have a direct bearing on domestic mining operations. These federal initiatives are often administered and enforced through state agencies operating under parallel state statutes and regulations.

The Clean Water Act. The federal Clean Water Act is the principal federal environmental protection law regulating mining operations in the United States as it pertains to water quality.

At the state level, water quality is regulated by the Environment Department, Water and Waste Management Division under the Water Quality Act (state). If our exploration or any future development activities might affect a ground water aquifer, it will have to apply for a Ground Water Discharge Permit from the Ground Water Quality Bureau in compliance with the Groundwater Regulations. If exploration affects surface water, then compliance with the Surface Water Regulations is required.

The Clean Air Act. The federal Clean Air Act establishes ambient air quality standards, limits the discharges of new sources and hazardous air pollutants and establishes a federal air quality permitting program for such discharges. Hazardous materials are defined in the federal Clean Air Act and enabling regulations adopted under the federal Clean Air Act to include various metals. The federal Clean Air Act also imposes limitations on the level of particulate matter generated from mining operations.

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NEPA requires all governmental agencies to consider the impact on the human environment of major federal actions as therein defined.

Endangered Species Act (ESA). The ESA requires federal agencies to ensure that any action authorized, funded or carried out by such agency is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered or threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of their critical habitat. In order to facilitate the conservation of imperiled species, the ESA establishes an interagency consultation process. When a federal agency proposes an action that “may affect” a listed species, it must consult with the USFWSUnited States Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”) and must prepare a “biological assessment” of the effects of a major construction activity if the USFWS advises that a threatened species may be present in the area of the activity.

National Forest Management Act. The National Forest Management Act, as implemented through title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations, provides a planning framework for lands and resource management of the National Forests. The planning framework seeks to manage the National Forest System resources in a combination that best serves the public interest without impairment of the productivity of the land, consistent with the Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act of 1960.

12 

 

Wilderness Act. The Wilderness Act of 1964 created a National Wilderness Preservation System composed of federally owned areas designated by Congress as “wilderness areas” to be preserved for future use and enjoyment.

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLA imposes clean-up and reclamation responsibilities with respect to discharges into the environment, and establishes significant criminal and civil penalties against those persons who are primarily responsible for such discharges.

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). RCRA was designed and implemented to regulate the disposal of solid and hazardous wastes. It restricts solid waste disposal practices and the management, reuse or recovery of solid wastes and imposes substantial additional requirements on the subcategory of solid wastes that are determined to be hazardous. Like the Clean Water Act, RCRA provides for citizens’ suits to enforce the provisions of the law.


National Historic Preservation Act. The National Historic Preservation Act was designed and implemented to protect historic and cultural properties. Compliance with the Act is necessary where federal properties or federal actions are undertaken, such as mineral exploration on federal land, which may impact historic or traditional cultural properties, including native or Indian cultural sites.

In the fiscal year ended August 31, 2017, we2023, RTMD incurred minimal costs in complying with environmental laws and regulations in relation to ourits operating activities.


Employees

Employees

Including our executive officers, we currently have three fulltimetwo full-time employees. Salaries for these three employees are in arrears and are accrued monthly. We also utilize the services of qualified consultants with geological and mineralogical expertise as well as individualsan individual for accounting services.

Investment Company Act Exclusion

Section 3(c)(9) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (“1940 Act”), provides that a company “substantially all of whose business consists of owning or holding oil, gas, or other mineral royalties or leases, or fractional interests therein, or certificates of interest or participation in or investment contracts relative to such royalties, leases, or fractional interests” is not an investment company within the meaning of the 1940 Act. The Company has determined that this exemption applies to it giving consideration to the following four factors:

whether the exempted activity constitutes “substantially all” of our business;

The Company has owned mineral leases since 2010, all of our business to date has been comprised of owning and developing the mineral leases and, after the May 2021 “farm-down” of its 100% interest in the mineral leases, substantially all of our business continues to be comprised of owning and holding a certificate of interest and a participation in the mineral leases owned by Round Top. The Company’s mineral assets historically, as well as the value of the certificate of interest at August 31, 2023, have been booked at cost in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). We have an accumulated deficit of approximately $42.7 million at August 31, 2023 as a result of owning and developing the Round Top Project.

whether we own or trade in the mineral leases;

The Company has owned the mineral leases, which are now owned by Round Top, since 2010 and neither the Company nor Round Top is in the business of dealing or trading in the mineral leases.

what qualifies as an eligible asset for purposes of the exception; and

The statute specifically references mineral leases and our mineral leases were owned by the Company and are now owned by Round Top. In accordance with Regulation S-K Item 1300 that governs disclosure by registrants engaged in mining operations, the definition of mineral resource is “a concentration or occurrence of material of economic interest in or on the Earth’s crust.” Our rare earth elements and minerals underlying the mineral leases meet that definition, as well as does coal, silver, gold and other material mined for economic value by registrants involved in mining operations. The SEC staff has recognized that an excepted entity can also engage in related business activities such as exploring, developing, and operating the eligible assets.

13 

what qualifies as a “certificate of interest or participation in” or an “investment contract relative to” the eligible assets.

The statute allows a Company to own a “certificate of interest” or “participation in” the mineral leases. The SEC staff has advised that limited partnership interests and/or similar securities issued by entities that themselves own the leases constitute “certificate of interest or participation in or investment contracts” related to such leases. The Company’s 20% membership interest in Round Top constitutes a “certificate of interest” and a “participation in” the mineral leases that are owned by Round Top.

 

The Company intends to continue to conduct its business operations in order to continue to be excluded from the definition of an “investment company” under the 1940 Act.

Available Information

We make available, free of charge, on or through our Internet website, at www.TMRC.com our Annual Reportannual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and our current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Our Internet website and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not intended to be, and are not incorporated into this Annual Report.

Our filings can also be viewed at our corporate offices, located at 539 El Paso Street, Sierra Blanca, Texas 79851. Our reports, registration statements and other information can be inspected on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and such information can also be inspected and copies ordered at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at the following location: Judiciary Plaza, 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C. 20549.

Executive Officers of the Company

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our executive officers as of December 11, 2017:

NameAgePosition
Daniel E. Gorski80Chief Executive Officer and Director
Wm Chris Mathers58Chief Financial Officer

Daniel E. Gorski – Mr. Gorski has severed as a director of the Company since January 2006 and as the Company’s chief operating officer since May 2011. Prior thereto, Mr. Gorski served as the Company’s president and chief executive officer from January 2007 to May 2011. From July 2004 to January 2006, Mr. Gorski was the co-founder and vice president of operations for High Plains Uranium Inc., a uranium exploration and development company that went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange in December 2005. Between June 1996 to May 2004, Mr. Gorski served as an officer and director of Metalline Mining Co., a publicly traded mining and development company with holdings in the Sierra Mojada Mining District, Coahuila, Mexico. From January 1992 to June 1996, Mr. Gorski was the exploration geologist under contract to USMX Inc. and worked exclusively in Latin America. Mr. Gorski earned a BS in 1960 from Sul Ross State College, in Alpine, Texas and an MA in 1970 from the University of Texas in Austin, Texas. Mr. Gorski has over forty-three years of experience in the mining industry.

Wm Chris Mathers – Mr. Mathers was appointed as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer from 2010 through 2012 and again from February 2016 through the present. Mr. Mathers is also involved in providing contract chief financial officer and consulting services to a wide variety of privately and publicly held companies. From 1993 through 1999, Mr. Mathers served as CFO to InterSystems, Inc. (AMEX:II). Mr. Mathers began his career in public accounting with the international accounting firm of PriceWaterhouse. Mr. Mathers holds a BBA in accounting from Southwestern University located in Georgetown, Texas, and is also a Certified Public Accountant.


ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The following sets forth certain risks and uncertainties that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or results of operations, and the trading price of our common stock which may decline (it has recently declined and may continue to further decline) and investors may lose all or part of their investment. These risk factors should be considered along with the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K because these factors could cause our actual results or financial condition to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements. Additional risks and uncertainties that we do not presently know or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations. We cannot assure you that we will successfully address these risks or that other unknown risks exist that may affect our business.

Risks Associated with our investment in Round Top

Failure to fund cash calls.

USARE, as manager, will issue monthly cash calls pursuant to adopted Budgets. Both parties, as members, will have 10 days after receipt of such a billing to meet the cash call. Failure to meet a cash call results in dilution. The governing provisions of the Operating Agreement with respect to cash calls and dilution are as follows:

Cash Calls.

On the basis of the adopted program and budget then in effect, the manager will submit to each member monthly cash calls at least 10 days before the last day of each month, and within 10 days of receipt, (a) USARE will pay to RTMD, as an additional capital contribution, its proportionate share of the estimated cash requirements based on its interest and (b) the Company will either (i) pay to RTMD, as an additional capital contribution, its proportionate share of the estimated cash requirements based on its interest, or (ii) deliver to RTMD a written notice indicating what amount, if any, of the applicable estimated cash requirements that the Company will contribute, being the Notice of Non-Contribution. Failure by the Company to deliver payment of its proportionate share of the estimated cash requirements, as an additional capital contribution, or to deliver a Notice of Non-Contribution within the 10 day period shall automatically be considered a “Deemed Non-Contribution” and shall have the same effect as if the Company provided a timely Notice of Non-Contribution with respect to non-contribution of its entire proportionate share of the applicable cash call.

Remedies for Failure to Meet Cash Calls

Non-Contribution. Capital contributions only will be made to fund programs and budgets. If the Company does not contribute all or any portion of any additional capital contribution that it is required to contribute pursuant to a Notice of Non-Contribution or a Deemed Non-Contribution, then USARE shall fund the entire shortfall, being the Shortfall Amount, within 5 business days after the Notice of Non-Contribution or Deemed Non-Contribution.

Dilution. Upon the contribution of the Shortfall Amount by USARE, the interests of the members will be recalculated based on the adjustment provision set forth below in the sub-heading “– Adjustment of Interests”.

Maximum Dilution. The dilution of the Company shall not fall below a 3% interest in RTMD, being the Minimum Percentage Interest. Upon the contribution by USARE of a Shortfall Amount which otherwise would result in a dilution of the Company below the Minimum Percentage Interest, USARE will receive a priority distribution of available cash, in addition to a distribution of available cash to which USARE otherwise is entitled to receive as a result of its proportionate additional capital contribution pursuant to the applicable cash call request, up to the Shortfall Amount that would have resulted in the Company’s interest being further diluted but for the Minimum Percentage Interest, being the Priority Distribution. The Priority Distribution will continue until USARE has been reimbursed for its contribution of the Shortfall Amount that would have resulted in the Company having an interest below the Minimum Percentage Interest, after which time the members shall receive distributions of available cash pro rata in proportion to their respective interests.

14 

 

Adjustment of Interests.

If USARE contributes the Shortfall Amount, then the then current interest of the Company will be reduced (subject to the Minimum Percentage Interest), effective as of each cash call under an additional capital contribution for the applicable program and budget, by a fraction, expressed as a percentage:

the numerator of which equals the Shortfall Amount actually funded by USARE; and

the denominator of which equals the market capitalization of the Company.

As such, the failure by us to fund our cash calls will result in dilution to our membership interest in RTMD, which could be significant over time and could ultimately reduce us to a 3% membership interest and possibly a Priority Distribution owed to USARE, as described above. Dilution to our membership interest in RTMD will adversely affect the value of our Company and likely the value of our Common Stock. We currently do not have the necessary capital to fund future cash calls and there can be no assurance that we will be able to raise additional capital to fund cash calls. Moreover, the raising of capital by issuing shares of Common Stock will result in dilution to our common stockholders).

Certain matters that require unanimous management committee approval will not be applicable if the Company’s membership interest falls below 15% in Round Top.

Meetings will be held every three months unless otherwise agreed. For matters before the management committee that require a vote, voting is by simple majority except for certain “major decisions” that require a unanimous vote. So long as the Company maintains a 15% or greater ownership interest, the nine decisions identified in the bullet points below require unanimous approval. If the Company’s ownership interest falls below 15%, the number of unanimous decisions is reduced to five (being the first five bullet points below). If the Company is acquired by a REE mining company or sells its ownership interest to a REE mining company, in each case who elects a majority of the Company’s board, this unanimous approval requirement can be suspended by USARE, at its option. The major decisions requiring unanimous approval, as set forth above, are:

approval of an amendment to any Budget that causes the Budget to increase by 15% or more, except for emergencies;

other than purchase money security interests or other security interests in Round Top equipment to finance the acquisition or lease of Round Top equipment used in operations, the consummation of a project financing or the incurrence by Round Top of any indebtedness for borrowed money that requires the guarantee by any member of any obligations of Round Top;

substitution of a member under certain circumstances and dissolution of Round Top;

the issuance of an ownership interest or other equity interest in Round Top, or the admission of any person as a new member of Round Top, other than in connection with the exercise of a right of first offer by a member;

the redemption of all or any portion of an ownership interest, except for limited circumstances provided for in the Operating Agreement;

a decision to grant authorization for Round Top to file a petition for relief under any chapter of the United States Bankruptcy Code, to consent to such relief in any involuntary petition filed against Round Top by any third party, or to admit in writing any insolvency of Round Top or inability to pay its debts as they become due, or to consent to any receivership of Round Top;

acquisition or disposition of significant mineral rights, other real property or water rights outside of the area of interest as set forth in the Operating Agreement or outside of the ordinary course of business;

the merger of Round Top into or with any other entity; and

the sale of all or substantially all of Round Top’s assets.

Any future dilution of our membership interest in RTMD below 15% will adversely impact our input with respect to certain RTMD corporate actions, which could adversely affect us.

15 

We have relied on an exclusion from the definition of “investment company” in order to avoid being subject to the Investment Company Act of 1940. To the extent the nature of our business changes in the future, we may become subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, which would limit our business operations and require us to spend significant resources in order to comply with such Act.

The 1940 Act defines an “investment company,” among other things, as an issuer that is engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and owns investment securities having a value exceeding 40 percent of the issuer’s unconsolidated assets, excluding cash items and securities issued by the federal government. However, the 1940 Act excludes from this definition any person substantially all of whose business consists of owning or holding oil, gas or other mineral royalties or leases or fractional interests therein, or certificates of interest or participation relating to such mineral royalties or leases. We believe that we satisfy this mineral company exception to the definition of “investment company.” If our reliance on the mineral company exclusion from the definition of investment company is misplaced, we may have been in violation of the 1940 Act, the consequences of which can be significant. For example, investment companies that fail to register under the 1940 Act are prohibited from conducting business in interstate commerce, which includes selling securities or entering into other contracts in interstate commerce.

If in the future the nature of our business changes, or a regulatory agency would disagree with our analysis regarding the exclusion from the 1940 Act, such that the mineral company exception to the threshold definition of investment company is not available to us, we will be required to register as an investment company with the SEC. The ramifications of becoming an investment company, both in terms of the restrictions it would have on our Company and the cost of compliance, would be significant. For example, in addition to expenses related to initially registering as an investment company, the 1940 Act also imposes various restrictions with regard to our ability to enter into affiliated transactions, the diversification of our assets and our ability to borrow money. If we became subject to the 1940 Act at some point in the future, our ability to continue pursuing our business plan would be severely limited as it would be significantly more difficult for us to raise additional capital in a manner that would comply with the requirements of the 1940 Act. To the extent we are unable to raise additional capital, we may be forced to discontinue our operations or sell or otherwise dispose of our mineral assets.

Risk Related to Our Business, Including Being an Owner of a 19.611% membership interest in a Mineral Project Being Operated by Round Top

Our ability to operate as a going concern is in doubt.

The audit opinion and notes that accompany our financial statements for the year ended August 31, 2017, disclose a going concern qualification to our ability to continue in business. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared underassuming that the assumptionCompany will continue as a going concern.

Our financial statements have been prepared assuming that wethe Company will continue as a going concern. We areThe Company has an exploration stage companyaccumulated deficit from inception through August 31, 2023, of approximately $42,344,000 and we have incurredhas yet to achieve profitable operations, and projects further losses since our inception. We do not have anyin the development of its business. At August 31, 2023, the Company had a working capital to fund normal operations and meet debt obligations without deferring payment on certain current liabilities and raising additional funds.

We currently have no historical recurring sourcesurplus of revenue and ourapproximately $1,025,000; however the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on ourupon its ability to raiseobtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and pay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due.

In accordance with our current projected Budget, the Company does not have sufficient capital to fund its (i) total cash calls expected during the fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 (currently anticipated to be between approximately $3 million to $4 million) and (ii) expected general and administrative expenses during the fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 (expected to be at least $600,000). Thus far during the current fiscal year, we have elected to incur dilution to our future explorationRound Top membership interest which as of the date of this Annual report is 19.611% and working capital requirements or our abilitythe failure of the Company to profitably execute our business plan. Our plans formake required cash calls to Round Top during the long-term return to and continuation as a going concern include financing our future operations through salesremainder of our common stock and/current fiscal year will result in further dilution to our current 19.611% ownership interest. We expect to incur dilution to our then current membership interest to fund our cash call obligations during the fiscal year ending August 31, 2024. The Company may be required to raise additional capital to fund its obligations (pursuant to the current Budget if it elects not to incur dilution to its then current membership interest and to fund general and administrative expenses) during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2024. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to raise the necessary capital to fund its cash calls and expected general and administrative expenses. We have no firm commitments for equity or debt financing and the eventual profitable exploitation of our mining properties. Additionally, the current capital markets and general economic conditions in the United States are significant obstacles to raising the required funds. Theseany financing that may be obtained will be on a best efforts basis. Based on these factors, raisethere is substantial doubt about ouras to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary shouldconcern for a period of twelve months from the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. If the going concern basis were not appropriate forissuance date of these financial statements, adjustments would be necessary in the carrying value of assets and liabilities, the reported expenses and the balance sheet classifications used.statements. The failure to obtain sufficient financing may cause us to curtail or discontinue operations.

We have a history of losses and will require additional financing to fund exploration and, if warranted, development and production of our properties.operations. Failure to obtain additional financing could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operation and could cast uncertainty on our ability to continue as a going concern.concern in future periods.

We had no revenues duringDuring the fiscal year ended August 31, 2017.2023, we had no revenues. For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2017,2023, our net loss was approximately $2,135,000$2.6 million and our accumulated deficit at August 31, 20172023 was approximately $34.6$42.3 million. At August 31, 2017,2023, our cash position was approximately $1,000$1.1 million and our working capital deficitsurplus was approximately $1,502,000. We have$1.0 million. Round Top has not commenced commercial production on any of ourits mineral properties. We haveproperties, and there can be no revenues from operations and anticipate weassurance that the Round Top Project will have no operating revenues until we place one or more of our properties intoever commence commercial production. All of our properties are in the exploration stage.

16 

 

We will need to raise additional funding to implement our business strategy. We currently do not have any working capital.


During the current fiscal year ending August 31, 2018, we plan2024, it is likely that USARE will be required to completefund our portion of current Round Top Budget estimated to be between $3 million and $4 million to optimize the first partleaching and developing of Stage 2the CIX/CIC processing of the Round Top Project, based on our metallurgical activities as discussedcurrent cash position (which will result in dilution to our membership interest in RTMD). Initial process design work will be carried out at USARE’s facility in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. Pending completion of the section heading “ITEM 2. PROPERTIES” ofinitial process development, this Annual Report. Our initial budget for Stage 1 of activity was approximately $508,000. To date we have spent approximately $134,000 completing Stage 1. Stage 2 is subdivided into two parts, the first, referredfacility will either be relocated to as milestone 1, is the bench scale separation of selected high purity rare earth carbonate. The second part, or milestone 2, is the construction and operation ofreplicated at USARE’s Oklahoma facility where a pilot plant. Milestone 1 of Stage 2 is in progress andplant is expected to be completed byestablished. It is estimated that the end of calendar year 2015. TMRC has spent approximately $360,000 on this phaseRound Top Project will require additional time and this expense isfurther expenditure to be augmented by an additional $140,000 supplied by the Defense Logistics Agency of the Department of Defense. Projected costs of the second part of Stage 2, milestone 2, is approximately $1,120,000. The final part of Stage 2, milestone 3, is the preparation ofcomplete a bankable feasibility study, if at all.

In accordance with the current Round Top Budget, the Company will likely continue to elect to incur dilution to its Round Top membership interest in lieu of providing cash payments to fund its portion of the process and is expected to cost approximately $500,000. We anticipate that our financing efforts will raiseRound Top Budget, as we don’t have sufficient capital to finish Stage 2 but therefund currently expected cash calls and general and administrative expenses during the fiscal year ending August 31, 2024. If we were to elect to fund our portion of the expected Round Top Budget in cash, we would be required to raise additional capital to fund our obligations during this fiscal year. Moreover, it is possible that the Round Top Budget for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2024 could increase and it should be expected that such Round Top Budget will be higher in future periods. There can be no guaranteeassurance that we will be able to raise the working capital necessary to complete Stage 1 or begin Stage 2 activities. After completion of Stage 2, we will use any remaining available capital to begin work on other phasesfund our cash calls and general and administrative expenses either during this current fiscal year or thereafter. The failure to fund our portion of project feasibility work.

We currently do not have any funds to complete exploration and development work on any of our properties, which means that we will be required to raise additional capital, enter into joint venture relationships the Round Top Budget during this current fiscal year and/or find alternative means to finance placing one or more of our properties into commercial production, if warranted. Failure to obtain sufficient financing maythereafter would result in the delay or indefinite postponement of exploration and development or production on one or morecontinued dilution of our properties and any properties we may acquire in the future membership interest Round Top (currently 19.611%, which dilution during this current fiscal year and/or even a loss of property interests. This includesthereafter could be significant), and/or could cause us to curtail or cease our leases over claims covering the principal deposits on our properties, which may expire unless we expend minimum levels of expenditures over the terms of such leases. We cannot be certain that additional capital or other types of financing will be available if needed or that, if available, the terms of such financing will be favorable or acceptable to us. Our ability to arrange additional financing in the future will depend, in part, on the prevailing capital market conditions as well as our business performance.


operations. The most likely source of future financing presently available to us is through the sale of our securities.securities, of which there is no assurance that we will be able to raise additional capital on reasonable terms, if at all. Any sale of our shares of common stockCommon Stock to raise capital will result in dilution of equity ownership to existing stockholders. This means that if we sell shares of common stock,Common Stock, more shares will be outstanding and each existing stockholder will own a smaller percentage of the shares then outstanding. Additionally, the actual or perceived sale of additional shares of Common Stock could have the effect of decreasing our stock price, which would further exacerbate dilution to our existing shareholders. Alternatively, we may rely on debt financing and assume debt obligations that require us to make substantial interest and capitalprincipal payments. Also, we may issue or grant warrants or options in the future pursuant to which additional shares of common stockCommon Stock may be issued. Exercise of such warrants or options will result in dilution of equity ownership to our existing stockholders. We have no firm commitments with respect to obtaining equity or debt financing and, accordingly, we will be reliant upon a best efforts financing strategy. The failure to obtain sufficient financing in this current fiscal year or subsequent thereto will result in the continued dilution of our membership interest in RTMD (which could be significant) and/or may cause us to curtail or discontinue operations.

We have a limited operating history on which to base an evaluation of our business and properties.

Any investment in the Company should be considered a high-risk investment because investors will be placing funds at risk in an early stage, under-capitalized business with unforeseen costs, expenses, competition, a history of operating losses and other problems to which start-up ventures are often subject. Investors should not invest in the Company unless they can afford to lose their entire investment. Your investment must be considered in light of the risks, expenses, and difficulties encountered in establishing a new business in a highly competitive and mature industry. Our operating history has been restricted to the acquisition and sampling of ourthe Round Top Project and this does not provide a meaningful basis for an evaluation of ourthe Round Top Project. Other than through conventional and typical exploration methods and procedures, we have no additional way to evaluate the likelihood of whether ourthe Round Top Project or our other mineral properties containcontains commercial quantities of mineral reserves or, if they do,it does, that theyit will be operated successfully. We anticipate that we will continue to incur operating costs in the form of cash calls in connection with our current 19.611% membership interest in Round Top without realizing any revenues during the period whenforeseeable future. If we are exploringcontinue to satisfy our properties.

AllRound Top cash call obligations through dilution to our then current membership interest, then we will incur continued dilution to our membership interest, which could be significant. To date, substantially all of our properties arebusiness consists of owning a 19.611% membership interest in Round Top as of the date of this Annual Report.

The Round Top Project is in the exploration stage. There is no assurance that weRound Top can establish the existence of any mineral reserve on any of our propertiesfrom the Round Top Project in commercially exploitable quantities. Until we can do so,then, we cannot earn any revenues from these properties,the Round Top Project, and our business could fail.

We have not established that the Round Top Project contains any commercial exploitable quantities of our properties contain any mineral reserve, nor can there be any assurance that we will be able to do so. The probability of an individual prospectthe Round Top Project ever having a commercial exploitable mineral reserve that meets the requirements of the SEC is extremelymay be remote. Even if we do eventually discover acommercial exploitable quantities of mineral reserve on one or more of our properties,the Round Top Project, there can be no assurance that theyit can be developed into a producing minesmine and extract those minerals. Both mineral exploration and development involve a high degree of risk and few properties, which are explored, are ultimately developed into producing mines.

The commercial viability of an established mineral deposit will depend on a number of factors including, by way of example, the size, grade and other attributes of the mineral deposit, the proximity of the deposit to infrastructure such as a smelter, roads and a point for shipping, government regulation and market prices. Most of these factors will be beyond our control, and any of them could increase costs and make extraction of any identified mineral deposit unprofitable.

17 

 

Even if commercial viability of a mineral deposit is established, it may take several years in the initial phases of drilling until production is possible, during which time the economic feasibility of production may change. Substantial expenditures are required to establish proven and probable reserves through drilling and bulk sampling, to determine the optimal metallurgical process to extract the metals from the ore and, in the case of new properties, to construct mining and processing facilities. Because of these uncertainties, no assurance can be given that our exploration programs will result in the establishment or expansion of a mineral deposit or reserves.


The Round Top Project is a high risk project and investors should not make an investment in the Company unless you have the ability to lose your entire investment.

We haveThere is no history of producing metals from our mineral properties.the Round Top Project.

We haveThere is no history of producing metals from any of our properties. Our properties are all exploration stage properties in various stages of exploration and evaluation. Ourthe Round Top Project. The Round Top Project is an early exploration stage project.property in the early stage of exploration and evaluation. Advancing properties from exploration into the development stage requires significant capital and time, and successful commercial production from a property,the Round Top Project, if any, will be subject to completing feasibility studies, permitting and construction of the mine, processing plants, roads, and other related works and infrastructure. As a result, we are subject to all of the risks associated with developing and establishing new mining operations and business enterprises including:

completion of feasibility studies to verify reserves and commercial viability, including the ability to find sufficient REE or gold reserves to support a commercial mining operation;

the timing and cost, which can be considerable, of further exploration, preparing feasibility studies, permitting and construction of infrastructure, mining and processing facilities;

the availability and costs of drill equipment, exploration personnel, skilled labor and mining and processing equipment, if required;

the availability and cost of appropriate smelting and/or refining arrangements, if required, and securing a commercially viable sales outlet for our products;

compliance with environmental and other governmental approval and permit requirements;

the availability of funds to finance exploration, development and construction activities, as warranted;

 


potential opposition from non-governmental organizations, environmental groups, local groups or local inhabitants which may delay or prevent development activities;

dilution to our membership interest in Round Top, which could be significant;

potential increases in exploration, construction and operating costs due to changes in the cost of fuel, power, materials and supplies; and

potential shortages of mineral processing, construction and other facilities related supplies.

 

The costs, timing and complexities of exploration, development and construction activities may be increased by the location of ourthe Round Top Project (or other properties that may subsequently be acquired) and demand by other mineral exploration and mining companies. It is common in exploration programs to experience unexpected problems and delays during drill programs and, if warranted, development, construction and mine start-up.start-up activities. Accordingly, ourRound Top’s activities may not result in profitable mining operations and weRound Top may not succeed in establishing mining operations or profitably producing metals at any of our properties.with respect to the Round Top Project. This is a high risk project and investors should not make an investment in the Company unless you have the ability to lose your entire investment.

If we establish the existence of a mineral reserve on any of our propertiesin the Round Top Project in a commercially exploitable quantity, we will require additional capital in order to maintain our current membership interest in Round Top and fund our proportionate costs to develop the property into a producing mine. If we cannot raise this additional capital, weour membership interest in RTMD will not be able to exploit the reserve,diluted, our membership interest will lose value, and our businessCompany could fail.

If we do discoverRound Top will be required to expend significant funds to determine if there exist mineral reserves in commercially exploitable quantities on any of our properties, wein the Round Top Project, and then Round Top will be required to expend substantial additional sums of money to establish the extent of the reserve, develop processes to extract it and develop extraction and processing facilities and infrastructure. We doEach of USARE and the Company, as the members of Round Top, will likely need to fund such expenditure. Our failure to raise capital to fund our portion of future cash calls will result in our current 19.611% membership interest being diluted. Round Top does not have adequate capital to fund expenditures at the project level, therefore requiring the members to fund cash calls based upon our current ownership interests in Round Top and we can elect to satisfy our cash call obligations through incurring dilution to our Round Top membership interest. There is no assurance that any Round Top project level financing can ever be obtained, which will depend initially upon obtaining a preliminary feasibility study which is anticipated to be completed during calendar 2024, although there can be no assurance that this will be obtained. As such, there is no assurance that, either at the member level or project level, the necessary financing can be obtained to develop necessary facilities and infrastructure and will need to raise additional funds.accomplish our goals. Although weRound Top may derive substantial benefits from the discovery of a major mineral deposit, there can be no assurance that such a deposit will be large enough to justify commercial operations, nor can there be any assurance that weRound Top will be able to raise the funds at the Round Top level required for development on a timely basis. If weRound Top cannot raise the necessary capital at the Round Top level or complete the necessary facilities and infrastructure, cash calls from the members will continue and if we can’t fund our position, our membership interest will continue to be diluted (which dilution could be significant) and/or our business may fail.fail and your investment in our Common Stock will be lost. Since June 2023 through the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our current membership interest was diluted from 20% to 19.611%, and it should be expected that our membership interest will be further diluted during this current fiscal year.

18 

 

Our exploration activities may not be commercially successful.

Our long-term success depends on our ability to identify mineral deposits on our existing properties andin the Round Top Project or other properties we may acquire, if any, that we can then develop into commercially viable mining operations. Our belief that our properties containthe Round Top Project contains commercially exploitable minerals has been based solely on preliminary tests that we haveRound Top has conducted and data provided by third parties including the data published in various third party reports, including but not limited to the GSA, Geological Society of America, Special Paper 246, 1990.(including USARE). There can be no assurance that the tests and data upon which we have relied is correct or accurate.accurate and, accordingly, there is no assurance that the Round Top Project contains commercially exploitable minerals. Moreover, mineral exploration is highly speculative in nature, involves many risks and is frequently non-productive. Unusual or unexpected geologic formations and the inability to obtain suitable or adequate machinery, equipment or labor are risks involved in the conduct of exploration programs. The success of mineral exploration and development is determined in part by the following factors:

the identification of potential mineralization based on analysis;

the availability of exploration permits;

the quality of our management and our geological and technical expertise; and

the capital available for exploration.

Substantial expenditures and time are required to establish existing proven and probable reserves through drilling and analysis, to develop metallurgical processes to extract metal, and to develop the mining and processing facilities and infrastructure at any site chosen for mining. Whether a mineral deposit will be commercially viable depends on a number of factors, which include, without limitation, the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure; metal prices, which fluctuate widely; and government regulations, including, without limitation, regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, allowable production, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection. Any one or a combination of these factors may result in us not receiving an adequate return on our investment capital.in Round Top or any other mineral project we may pursue. The decision to abandon a project maywill have an adverse effect on the market value of our securities and our ability, if any, to raise future financing.


Increased costs could affect our financial condition.

We anticipate that costs at our projects that we may explore or develop,the Round Top Project as it is developed, if warranted, will frequently be subject to variation from one year to the next due to a number of factors, such as changing ore grade, metallurgy and revisions to mine plans, if any, in response to the physical shape and location of the ore body. In addition, costs are affected by the price of commodities such as fuel, rubber, and electricity. Such commodities are at times subject to volatile price movements, including increases that could make production at certain operations less profitable. A material increase in costs at any significant location could have a significant effect on the Round Top operations as well as Round Top member funding requirements.

Macroeconomic conditions, domestic and global political turbulence could have a materially adverse impact on our profitability.business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Macroeconomic conditions, such as high inflation, changes to monetary policy, high interest rates, volatile currency exchange rates, decreasing consumer confidence and spending, and global or local recessions could negatively impact our business, financial condition, or results of operations. Recent macroeconomic conditions have been and likely will continue to be adversely impacted by political instability and military hostilities in multiple geographies (including the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia and the conflict in the Middle East). The results of these macroeconomic conditions, and the actions taken by governments and consumers in response, have, and may continue to, result in higher inflation and higher interest rates in the U.S. and globally, which may, in turn, lead to an increase in costs and cause changes in fiscal and monetary policy, including additional increased interest rates.

19 

 


No assurance that the Company will enter into any agreement with respect to the Alhambra project owned by Santa Fe or that this project will proceed.

While the Company has entered into a mineral exploration and operation agreement with Santa Fe, there is no assurance the Company will enter into a formal joint venture agreement or otherwise pursue this project. Even if the Company enters into a formal joint venture agreement with Santa Fe, there is no assurance that this project will be economically feasible, that exploration will be successful or that this project will be a commercial success. The Company is currently pursuing financing sources for this project and there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to arrange and procure necessary financing to commercially exploit a silver property currently held by Santa Fe within the Black Hawk Mining District in Grant County, New Mexico. The status of our electromagnetic surveying and testing with respect to this project is preliminary in nature and there can be no assurance that this project will proceed or that results will be positive.

Licensing and permitting of mining operations in the State of New Mexico is difficult and could have a material effect on the length of time and cost of securing the required permits.

Regulatory agencies governing permitting include the New Mexico Mining and Minerals Division of the State of New Mexico, New Mexico Environmental Department, New Mexico Office of the State Engineer, the US Forest Service, the US Fish and Wildlife Service, the EPA, Mine Safety and Health Administration and Grant County, New Mexico. Permitting process is also vulnerable to the intrusion of various non-governmental organizations hostile to mining. Accordingly, there is no assurance that we will be able to obtain the necessary permits with respect to the Alhambra project, either at the state or federal level.

A shortage of equipment and supplies could adversely affect our ability to operate our business.

We areRound Top is and will be dependent on various supplies and equipment to carry out our mining exploration and, if warranted, development operations. The shortage of such supplies, equipment and parts could have a material adverse effect on ourthe ability to carry out ourRound Top’s operations and therefore limit or increase the cost of production.

Mining and mineral exploration is inherently dangerous and subject to conditions or events beyond our control, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and plans.

Mining and mineral exploration involves various types of risks and hazards, including:

environmental hazards;

 

environmental hazards;power outages;

power outages;

metallurgical and other processing problems;

unusual or unexpected geological formations;

personal injury, flooding, fire, explosions, cave-ins, landslides and rock-bursts;

inability to obtain suitable or adequate machinery, equipment, or labor;

metals losses;

fluctuations in exploration, development and production costs;

labor disputes;

unanticipated variations in grade;

mechanical equipment failure; and

periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous weather conditions.

These risks could result in damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties,the Round Top Project, production facilities or other properties, personal injury, environmental damage, delays in mining, increased production costs, monetary losses and possible legal liability. WeRound Top may not be able to obtain insurance to cover these risks at economically feasible premiums. Insurance against certain environmental risks, including potential liability for pollution or other hazards as a result of the disposal of waste products occurring from production, may be prohibitively expensive. WeRound Top may suffer a material adverse effect on ourits business if we incur losses related to any significant events that are not covered by our insurance policies.

20 

 

The figures for our mineralization are estimates based on interpretation and assumptions and may yield less mineral production under actual conditions than is currently estimated.

Unless otherwise indicated, mineralization figures presented in this prospectusAnnual Report and in our filings with securities regulatory authorities, press releases and other public statements that may be made from time to time are based upon estimates made by independent geologists and our internal geologists. When making determinations about whether to advance any of our projects to development any project that we must relyhave or may have interest in will be reliant upon such estimated calculations as to the mineral reserves and grades of mineralization on our properties. Until ore is actually mined and processed, mineral reserves and grades of mineralization must be considered as estimates only. All resource and grade estimates are based on state of the art analytical methods. However, any procedure for analyzing small amounts of metals in a chemically complex matrix may be subject to error and other uncertainties.

Estimates made to date rely on geophysical data, and geophysics is an indirect method of exploration and must be verified by drilling and underground investigation. Additionally, estimates can be imprecise and depend upon geological interpretation and statistical inferences drawn from drilling and sampling analysis, which may prove to be unreliable. We cannot assure you that:

these interpretations and inferences will be accurate;

mineralization estimates will be accurate; or

this mineralization can be mined or processed profitably.

 


Investors should not rely upon any such figures in making an investment decision to acquire our Common Stock.

Any material changes in mineralization estimates and grades of mineralization will affect the economic viability of placing a property into production and a property’s return on capital.

Because we have not completed feasibility studies on any of our properties and have not commenced actual production, mineralization estimates for our propertiesThe Round Top operations may require adjustments or downward revisions. In addition, the grade of ore ultimately mined, if any, may differ from that indicated by our feasibility studies and drill results. Minerals recovered in small scale tests may not be duplicated in large scale tests under on-site conditions or in production scale.

The mineralization estimates contained in this Annual Report have been determined and valued based on assumed future prices, cut-off grades and operating costs that may prove to be inaccurate. Extended declines in market prices for rare earth minerals may render portions of our mineralization estimates uneconomic and result in reduced reported mineralization or adversely affect the commercial viability determinations we reach. Any material reductions in estimates of mineralization, or of our ability to extract this mineralization, could have a material adverse effect on our share price and the value of our properties.


Analytical Uncertainties

All resource and grade estimates are based of state of the art analytical methods. However, any procedure for analyzing for small amounts of metals in a chemically complex matrix may be subject to error and other uncertainties.

Our operations contain significant uninsured risks which could negatively impact future profitability as we maintain no insurance against our operations.profitability.

OurAny exploration of our mineral propertiesthe Round Top Project contains and will contain certain risks, including unexpected or unusual operating conditions including rock bursts, cave-ins, flooding, fire and earthquakes. It is not always possible to insure against these risks. Should events such as these arise, they could reduce or eliminate our assets and shareholder equityinvestment in Round Top as well as result in increased costs and a decline in the value of our securities.  We expect to maintain only general liability and director and officer insurance but no insurance against our properties or operations.  We may decide to take out this insurance in the future if it is available at economically viable rates.investment.

Mineral operations are subject to market forces outside of our control which could negatively impact our operationsus.

The marketability of minerals is affected by numerous factors beyond our control including market fluctuations, government regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, allowable production, imports, exports and supply and demand. One or more of these risk elements could have an impact on the costs of ourthe Round Top operations and, if significant enough, reduce the profitability ofcould impact our operations.investment.

We may be adversely affected by fluctuations in demand for, and prices of, rare earth minerals and products.

We expectOur goal is for Round Top to derive revenues, if any, from the sale of rare earth and related minerals.minerals by Round Top. Changes in demand for, and the market price of, these minerals could significantly affect our profitability.us. The value and price of our common stockCommon Stock and our financial results may be significantly adversely affected by declines in the prices of rare earth minerals and products. Rare earth minerals and product prices may fluctuate and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control such as interest rates, exchange rates, inflation or deflation, fluctuation in the relative value of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies on the world market, global and regional supply and demand for rare earth minerals and products, and the political and economic conditions of countries (including specifically China and the U.S.’s relationship with China at any given time) that produce rare earth minerals and products.

A prolonged or significant economic contraction in the United States or worldwide could put further downward pressure on market prices of rare earth minerals and products. Protracted periods of low prices for rare earth minerals and products could significantly reduce revenues and the availability of required development funds in the future. This could cause substantial reductions to, or a suspension of, REO production operations, impair asset values and if reserves are established on our prospects, reduce our proven and probable rare earth ore reserves.

In contrast, extended periods of high commodity prices may create economic dislocations that may be destabilizing to rare earth minerals supply and demand and ultimately to the broader markets. Periods of high rare earth mineral market prices generally are beneficial to our financial performance.us. However, strong rare earth mineral prices also create economic pressure to identify or create alternate technologies that ultimately could depress future long-term demand for rare earth minerals and products, and at the same time may incentivize development of otherwise marginal mining properties.

21 

 


Permitting, licensing and approval processes are required for ourthe operations at the Round Top Project and obtaining and maintaining theserequired permits and licenses is subject to conditions which we may be unable to achieve.be achieved.

Both mineral exploration and extraction requireat the Round Top Project requires permits from various federal, state, provincial and local governmental authorities and are governed by laws and regulations, including those with respect to prospecting, mine development, mineral production, transport, export, taxation, labor standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental protection, mine safety and other matters. Permits known to be required are (i) an operating plan for the conduct of exploration and development approved by the Texas General Land Office,GLO, (ii) an operating plan for production approved by the Texas General Land Office,GLO, (iii) various reporting to and approval by the Texas Railroad Commission regarding drilling and plugging of drill holes, and (v) reporting to and compliance with regulations of the Texas Commission of Environmental Quality. If we recoverRound Top recovers uranium from our mineral prospects, weat the Round Top Project, it will be required to obtain a source material license from the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. WeRound Top may also be subject to the reporting requirements and regulations of the Texas Department of Health.


Such licenses and permits are subject to changes in regulations and changes in various operating circumstances. Companies such as ours that engage in exploration activities often experience increased costs and delays in production and other schedules as a result of the need to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permits. Issuance of permits for ourthe Round Top activities is subject to the discretion of government authorities, and weRound Top may be unable to obtain or maintain such permits. Permits required for future exploration or development may not be obtainable on reasonable terms or on a timely basis. There can be no assurance that weRound Top will be able to obtain or maintain any of the permits required for the continued exploration or development of the Round Top Project (or any other of our mineral properties that we may subsequently acquire) or for the construction and operation of a mine on our properties that we may subsequently acquire at economically viable costs. If Round Top or we cannot accomplish these objectives, our business could face difficulty and/or fail.

We areRound Top is subject to significant governmental regulations, which affect ourits operations and costs of conducting ourits business.

OurRound Top’s current and future operations are and will be governed by laws and regulations, including:

laws and regulations governing mineral concession acquisition, prospecting, development, mining and production;

laws and regulations related to exports, taxes and fees;

labor standards and regulations related to occupational health and mine safety;

environmental standards and regulations related to waste disposal, toxic substances, land use and environmental protection; and

other matters.

 

CompaniesCorporations engaged in exploration activities often experience increased costs and delays in production and other schedules as a result of the need to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permits. Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permits may result in enforcement actions, including the forfeiture of claims, orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities requiring operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment or costly remedial actions. WeRound Top may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of ourits mineral exploration activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of such laws, regulations and permits.

Existing and possible future laws, regulations and permits governing operations and activities of exploration companies, or more stringent implementation, could have a material adverse impact on ourRound Top’s business and cause increases in capital expenditures or require abandonment or delays in exploration.

Legislation has been proposed that would significantly affect the mining industry.

Members of the U.S. Congress have repeatedly introduced bills which would supplant or alter the provisions of the Mining Law of 1872. If enacted, such legislation could change the cost of holding unpatented mining claims and could significantly impact our ability to develop mineralized material on unpatented mining claims. Such bills have proposed, among other things, to either eliminate or greatly limit the right to a mineral patent and to impose a federal royalty on production from unpatented mining claims. Although we cannot predict what legislated royalties might be, the enactment of these proposed bills could adversely affect the potential for development of unpatented mining claims and the economics of existing operating mines on federal unpatented mining claims. Passage of such legislation could adversely affect our financial performance.


Regulations and pending legislation governing issues involving climate change could result in increased operating costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.Round Top as well as any other business in which we engage.

A number of governments or governmental bodies have introduced or are contemplating regulatory changes in response to various climate change interest groups and the potential impact of climate change. Legislation and increased regulation regarding climate change could impose significant costs on us,Round Top, our venture partners and our suppliers, including costs related to increased energy requirements, capital equipment, environmental monitoring and reporting and other costs to comply with such regulations. Any adopted future climate change regulations could also negatively impact ourthe ability to compete with companies situated in areas not subject to such limitations. Given the emotion, political significance and uncertainty around the impact of climate change and how it should be dealt with, we cannot predict how legislation and regulation will affect our financial condition, operating performance and ability to compete. Furthermore, even without such regulation, increased awareness and any adverse publicity in the global marketplace about potential impacts on climate change by us or other companies in our industry could harm our reputation. The potential physical impacts of climate change on our operations are highly uncertain, and would be particular to the geographic circumstances in areas in which we operate. These may include changes in rainfall and storm patterns and intensities, water shortages, changing sea levels and changing temperatures. These impacts may adversely impact the cost, production and financial performance of our operations.the Round Top operations or any other mineral projects we may pursue.

22 

 


OurRound Top’s exploration and development activities are subject to environmental risks, which could expose usRound Top to significant liability and delay, suspension or termination of our operations.

The exploration, possible future development and production phases of ourthe Round Top business will be subject to federal, state and local environmental regulation. These regulations mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards and land reclamation. They also set out limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments, and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. Future changes in environmental regulations, if any, may adversely affect our operations. If we failRound Top fails to comply with any of the applicable environmental laws, regulations or permit requirements, weit could face regulatory or judicial sanctions. Penalties imposed by either the courts or administrative bodies could delay or stop our operations or require a considerable capital expenditure. Although we intendRound Top intends to comply with all environmental laws and permitting obligations in conducting ourits business, there is a possibility that those opposed to exploration and mining will attempt to interfere with ourits operations, whether by legal process, regulatory process or otherwise.

Environmental hazards unknown to us,Round Top, which have been caused by previous or existing owners or operators of the properties, may exist on the properties in which we hold an interest.comprising the Round Top Project. It is possible that ourthese properties could be located on or near the site of a Federal Superfund cleanup project. Although we will endeavor to avoidproject; as such, sites, it is possible that environmental cleanup or other environmental restoration procedures could remain to be completed or mandated by law, causing unpredictable and unexpected liabilities to arise.

U.S. Federal Laws

The Comprehensive Environmental, Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)(“CERCLA”), and comparable state statutes, impose strict, joint and several liability on current and former owners and operators of sites and on persons who disposed of or arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances found at such sites. It is not uncommon for the government to file claims requiring cleanup actions, demands for reimbursement for government-incurred cleanup costs, or natural resource damages, or for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by hazardous substances released into the environment. The Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)(“RCRA”), and comparable state statutes, govern the disposal of solid waste and hazardous waste and authorize the imposition of substantial fines and penalties for noncompliance, as well as requirements for corrective actions. CERCLA, RCRA and comparable state statutes can impose liability for clean-up of sites and disposal of substances found on exploration, mining and processing sites long after activities on such sites have been completed.

The Clean Air Act, as amended, restricts the emission of air pollutants from many sources, including mining and processing activities. Our mining operations may produce air emissions, including fugitive dust and other air pollutants from stationary equipment, storage facilities and the use of mobile sources such as trucks and heavy construction equipment, which are subject to review, monitoring and/or control requirements under the Clean Air Act and state air quality laws. New facilities may be required to obtain permits before work can begin, and existing facilities may be required to incur capital costs in order to remain in compliance. In addition, permitting rules may impose limitations on our production levels or result in additional capital expenditures in order to comply with the rules.

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)(“NEPA”) requires federal agencies to integrate environmental considerations into their decision-making processes by evaluating the environmental impacts of their proposed actions, including issuance of permits to mining facilities, and assessing alternatives to those actions. If a proposed action could significantly affect the environment, the agency must prepare a detailed statement known as an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)(“EIS”). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), other federal agencies, and any interested third parties will review and comment on the scoping of the EIS and the adequacy of and findings set forth in the draft and final EIS. This process can cause delays in issuance of required permits or result in changes to a project to mitigate its potential environmental impacts, which can in turn impact the economic feasibility of a proposed project.


The Clean Water Act (CWA)(“CWA”), and comparable state statutes, imposes restrictions and controls on the discharge of pollutants into waters of the United States. The discharge of pollutants into regulated waters is prohibited, except in accordance with the terms of a permit issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)EPA or an analogous state agency. The CWA regulates storm water mining facilities and requires a storm water discharge permit for certain activities. Such a permit requires the regulated facility to monitor and sample storm water run-off from its operations. The CWA and regulations implemented thereunder also prohibit discharges of dredged and fill material in wetlands and other waters of the United States unless authorized by an appropriately issued permit. The CWA and comparable state statutes provide for civil, criminal and administrative penalties for unauthorized discharges of pollutants and impose liability on parties responsible for those discharges for the costs of cleaning up any environmental damage caused by the release and for natural resource damages resulting from the release.

The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)(“SDWA”) and the Underground Injection Control (UIC)(“UIC”) program promulgated thereunder, regulate the drilling and operation of subsurface injection wells. EPA directly administers the UIC program in some states and in others the responsibility for the program has been delegated to the state. The program requires that a permit be obtained before drilling a disposal or injection well. Violation of these regulations and/or contamination of groundwater by mining related activities may result in fines, penalties, and remediation costs, among other sanctions and liabilities under the SWDA and state laws. In addition, third party claims may be filed by landowners and other parties claiming damages for alternative water supplies, property damages, and bodily injury.

23 

 

WeRound Top could be subject to environmental lawsuits.

Neighboring landowners and other third parties could file claims based on environmental statutes and common law for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the release of hazardous substances or other waste material into the environment on or around our properties.the Round Top Project. There can be no assurance that ourany defense of such claims will be successful. A successful claim against usRound Top could have an adverse effect on not only Round Top, but us and our business prospects, financial condition and results of operation.


Land reclamation requirements for our propertiesthe Round Top Project may be burdensome and expensive.

Although variable depending onvariability exists by location and the governing authority, land reclamation requirements are generally imposed on mineral exploration companies (as well as companies with mining operations) in order to minimize long term effects of land disturbance.

Reclamation may include requirements to:

control dispersion of potentially deleterious effluents;

treat ground and surface water to drinking water standards; and

reasonably re-establish pre-disturbance land forms and vegetation.

 

In order to carry out reclamation obligations imposed on usRound Top in connection with our potential development activities, weRound Top must allocate financial resources that might otherwise be spent on further exploration and development programs. We planRound Top plans to set up a provision for our reclamation obligations on ourits properties, as appropriate, but this provision may not be adequate. If we areRound Top is required to carry out unanticipated reclamation work, ourits financial position could be adversely affected. In accordance with our GLO lease/prospecting permits, all the areas impacted by the surface operations shall be reclaimed upon completion of the activity, such that:including (a) Removeremoval of all trash, debris, plastic and contaminated soil by off-site disposal;disposal, and (b) Uponupon completion of surface grading, the soil surface shall be left in a roughened condition to negate wind and enhance water infiltration.

Rare earth and beryllium miningMining presents potential health risks.  Paymentrisks; payment of any liabilities that arise from these health risks may adversely impact our Company.Round Top.

Complying with health and safety standards will require additional expenditure on testing and the installation of safety equipment. Moreover, inhalation of certain minerals such as beryllium can result in specific potential health risks ranging from acute pneumonitis, tracheobronchitis, and chronic beryllium disease to an increased risk of cancer.risks. Symptoms of these associated diseases may take years to manifest. Failure to comply with health and safety standards could result in statutory penalties and civil liability. We doRound Top does not currently maintain any insurance coverage against these health risks. The payment of any liabilities that arise from any such occurrences wouldcould have a material, adverse impact on our Company.Round Top.

There may be challenges to the title of ourthe Round Top Project or any other mineral properties.properties that we may acquire.

We expect that any additional properties to be acquired by Round Top or by us (with respect to any other opportunities) will acquire most of its propertiesbe by unpatented claims or by lease from those owning the property. The lease of ourthe Round Top Project property was issued by the State of Texas. The validity of title to many types of natural resource property depends upon numerous circumstances and factual matters (many of which are not discoverable of record or by other readily available means) and is subject to many uncertainties of existing law and its application. We cannot assure you that the validity of ourRound Top’s titles to its properties or our title to properties we may purchase in the future will be upheld or that third parties will not otherwise invalidate those rights. In the event the validity of Round Top’s or our titles with respect to any future properties are not upheld, such an event would have a material adverse effect on Round Top and us.

We are developing our metallurgical processes through a joint venture with K-Technologies, Inc, which is subject to the risks normally associated with the conduct of joint ventures.

Our metallurgical processing efforts are currently focused on CIX/CIC processing through a joint venture with K-Technologies, Inc. and is subject to the risks normally associated with the conduct of joint ventures. Such risks include: inability to exert control over strategic decisions made in respect of the development and use of the processes; disagreement with partners on how to develop and operate the processes efficiently; inability of partners to meet their obligations to the joint venture or third parties; and litigation between partners regarding joint venture matters. Any failure of such other companies to meet their obligations to us, the joint venture or to third parties, or any disputes with respect to the parties’ respective rights and obligations, could have a material adverse effect on the joint venture or the development and use of the processes, which could have a material adverse effect on our  results of operations and financial condition.


Increased competition could adversely affect our ability to attract necessary capital funding or acquire suitable producing properties or prospects for mineral exploration in the future.

The mining industry is intensely competitive. Significant competition exists for the acquisition of properties producing or capable of producing, REE gold or other metals. We may belikely are at a competitive disadvantage in acquiring additional mining properties because we must compete with other individuals and companies, manymost of which have greater financial resources, operational experience and technical capabilities than us. We may also encounter increasing competition from other mining companies in our efforts to hire experienced mining professionals. Competition for exploration resources at all levels is currently very intense, particularly affecting the availability of manpower, drill rigs, mining equipment and production equipment. Increased competition could adversely affect our ability to attract necessary capital funding or acquire suitable producing properties or prospects for mineral exploration in the future.


We competeRound Top competes with larger, better capitalized competitors in the mining industry.

The mining industry is competitive in all of its phases, including financing, technical resources, personnel and property acquisition. WeRound Top will require significant capital, technical resources, personnel and operational experience to effectively compete in the mining industry. Because of the high costs associated with exploration, the expertise required to analyze a project’s potential and the capital required to develop a mine, larger companies with significant resources may have a competitive advantage over us. We faceRound Top. Round Top faces strong competition from other mining companies, some with greater financial resources, operational experience and technical capabilities than us. As a result of this competition, weneither Round Top nor us may be unableable to maintain or acquire financing, personnel, technical resources or attractive mining properties on acceptable terms, we consider acceptable orif at all.

24 

 

Current economic conditions and capital markets are in a period of disruption and instabilitysubject to fluctuations which could adversely affect our ability to access the capital markets, and thus adversely affect our business and liquidity.

The current economic conditions and financial crisis have had, and will continue toare in a state of flux that could have a negative impact on our ability to access the capital markets, and thus have a negative impact on our business and liquidity. The shortageWe currently face the macroeconomic headwinds of liquidityinflation and credit combined with substantial losses in worldwide equity markets could lead to an extended worldwide recession. We may face significant challenges if conditions in the capital markets do not improve.high interest rates. Furthermore, it is unclear how global hostilities will impact our business. Our ability to access the capital markets has been and continues to be severely restricted at a time when we need to access such markets, which could have a negative impact on our business plans. Even if we are able to raise capital, it may not be at a price or on terms that are favorable to us. We cannot predict the occurrence of future financial disruptions or how long the current market conditions may continue. It should be expected that we will have difficulty to raise funds, if we are even able to raise funds at all, and any such capital raises will be dilutive to our current stockholders (which dilution could be significant).

Our resources may not be sufficient to manage our expectedexisting business as well as any growth; failure to properly manage our potential growth wouldexisting business will be detrimental to our business.

We may fail to adequately manage our anticipated future growth. Anycurrent business. Furthermore, any growth in our operations, of which there can be no assurance, will place a significant strain on our administrative, financial and operational resources, and increase demands on our management and on our operational and administrative systems, controls and other resources. We cannot assure you that our existing personnel, systems, procedures or controls will be adequate to support our current operations or operations in the future or that we will be able to successfully implement appropriate measures consistent with our growth strategy. As part of this growth, weany growth. We may have to implement new operational and financial systems, procedures and controls to expand, train and manage our employee base, and maintain close coordination among our staff. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so, or that if we are able to do so, we will be able to effectively integrate them into our existing staff and systems. Moreover, there can be no assurance that cybersecurity threats, breaches, or disruptions will not adversely affect us.

If we are unable to manage growthour current business effectively, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. As with all expanding businesses, the potential existsThere is no assurance that growthour current business will occur rapidly. If we are unablegrow and it may well shrink due to effectively manage this growth, our business and operating results could suffer. Anticipated growth in future operations may place a significant strain on management systems and resources. In addition, the integrationlack of new personnel will continue to result in some disruption to ongoing operations. The ability to effectively manage growth in a rapidly evolving market requires effective planning and management processes. We will need to continue to improve operational, financial and managerial controls, reporting systems and procedures, and will need to continue to expand, train and manage our work force.capital.


We may experience difficulty attracting and retaining qualified management to meet theour current business needs of our anticipatedand/or any growth needs, and the failure to manage ourany growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Competition for additional qualified management is intense, and we may be unable to attract and retain additional key personnel, or to attract and retain personnel on terms acceptable to us. Management personnel are currently limited and they may be unable to manage our expansion successfully and the failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We have not entered into non-competition agreements. As our business is substantially dependent upon the directors, executive officers and consultants, the lack of non-competition agreements poses a significant risk to us in the event such persons were to resign or be terminated from such positions. Under such circumstances, such persons may provide confidential information and key contacts to our competitors and we may have difficulties in preventing the disclosure of such information. Such disclosure would have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

Our operations are dependent upon key personnel, the loss of which would be detrimental to our business.

The nature of our business, including our ability to continue our exploration and development activities, depends, in large part, on the efforts of key personnel such as Daniel Gorski, our Chief Executive Officer. The loss of Mr. Gorski could have a material adverse effect on our business. We do not maintain “key man” life insurance policies on any of our officers or employees.

Risks Associated with our Common Stock

Investment in our Company has a high degree of risk. Before you invest you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, operating results and financial condition could be harmed and the value of our stock could go down.

We have a history of losses and fluctuating operating results that raises doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

From inception through August 31, 2023, we have incurred aggregate losses of approximately $42.334 million. There is no assurance that we will operate profitably or will generate positive cash flow in the future. In addition, our operating results in the future may be subject to significant fluctuations due to many factors not within our control, such as general economic conditions, hostilities in the Middle East and Ukraine, market price of minerals and exploration and development costs. If we cannot raise sufficient financing to continue our operations, then we may be forced to scale down or even close our operations. Until such time as we generate revenues (not in the foreseeable future), we expect an increase in development costs and operating costs. Consequently, we expect to incur operating losses and negative cash flow until our properties enter commercial production (if such event occurs).

25 

 


Our stock price is highly volatile.

The market price of our common stockCommon Stock has fluctuated and may continue to fluctuate. These fluctuations may be exaggerated since the trading volume of its common stockour Common Stock is volatile, limited, sporadic, and sporadic.volatile. These fluctuations may or may not be based upon any business or operating results. Our common stockCommon Stock may experience similar or even more dramatic price and volume fluctuations in the future. Our Common Stock price has decreased from $1.31 per share on January 3, 2023 to $0.31 per share on November 10, 2023. We have limited trading volume in our Common Stock. There is no assurance that our Common Stock price will not continue to decline. Based on current market prices and current trading volume, raising any capital will likely be dilutive and difficult, and may not be possible at all.

The market for the common stockour Common Stock is limited, sporadic and volatile. Any failure to develop or maintain an active trading market could negatively affect the value of our shares and make it difficult or impossible for you to sell your shares.

Our common stockCommon Stock is currently traded on the OTCQX U.S., a centralized quotation service maintained by OTC Markets Group Inc. that collects and publishes market maker quotes for over-the-counter securities.OTCQB. Although our common stockCommon Stock is traded on the OTCQX U.S.,OTCQB, a regular trading market for our securities may not be sustained in the future. Specifically, we currently are not in compliance with the continued trading requirements of the OTCQX U.S. and may be removed from quotations on the OTCQX if we do not regain compliance in the near future.  If we are removed from the OTCQX, we anticipate that our stock would continue to be quoted on the OTCQB. Quotes for stocks traded on the OTCQX U.S. or OTCQB generally are not listed in the financial sections of newspapers and newspapers often devote very little coverage to stocks quoted solely on the OTCQX U.S. or OTCQB. Accordingly, pricesPrices for, and coverage of, securities quoted solely on the OTCQX U.S. or OTCQB may be difficult to obtain. In addition, stocks quoted solely on the OTCQX U.S. or OTCQB tend to have a limited number of market makers and a larger spread between the bid and ask prices than those listed on an exchange. All of these factors may cause holders of our common stockCommon Stock to be unable to resell their securities at any price. ThisIt should be expected that this limited trading also could decrease or eliminate our ability to raise additional funds through issuances of our securities.

Failure to develop or maintain an active trading market couldwould negatively affect the value of our shares, and make it difficult for you to sell your shares or recover any part of your investment in us.us, and impact our ability to raise capital through the sale of shares of our Common Stock. Even if an active market for our common stockCommon Stock does develop, the market price of our common stockCommon Stock may be highly volatile. In addition to the uncertainties relating to our future operating performance and theany profitability of our operations, factors such as variations in our interim financial results, or various, as yet unpredictable factors, many of which are beyond our control, may have a negative effect on the market price of our common stock.Common Stock. Accordingly, there can be no assurance as to the liquidity of any active markets that may develop for our common stock,Common Stock, the ability of holders of our common stockCommon Stock to sell our common stock, orCommon Stock, the prices at which holders may be able to sell our common stock.Common Stock, or our ability (if any) to sell shares of our Common Stock to raise capital.

The sale of substantial shares of our common stockCommon Stock or the issuance of shares upon exercise of our warrantscommon stock equivalents will cause immediate and substantial dilution to our existing stockholders and may depress the market price of our common stockCommon Stock.

In order to provide capital for the operation of our business, we may enter into additional financing arrangements. These arrangements may involve the issuance of new common stock,Common Stock, preferred stock that is convertible into common stock,Common Stock, debt securities that are convertible into common stockCommon Stock or warrants for the purchase of common stock.Common Stock. Any of these items could result in a material increase in the number of shares of common stockCommon Stock outstanding which would in turn result in a dilution of the ownership interest of existing commonCommon Stockholders. It is likely that any future private placements of our Common Stock will be at prices below market, thereby further placing pressure on the price of our Common Stock that trade on the OTCQB – this would have the effect of both reducing our market price and diluting our current stockholders. As such, any future capital raises will likely adversely affect our shareholders. In addition, these new securities could contain provisions, such as priorities on distributions and voting rights, which could affect the value of our existing common stock.Common Stock.


As of August 31, 2017,November 21, 2023, we have approximately 44.9 million73,784,810 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding (100,000,000 shares of Common Stock are authorized to be issued), and 1,030,000 shares of our Common Stock underlying common stock outstanding.  In addition to our common stock, we have (i) warrants that may be exercised into 4,272,275 shares of common stock exercisableequivalents at $0.35exercise prices between $0.10 and $1.31 per share, (ii) warrants that may be exercised into 4,272,275 shares of common stock exercisable at $0.50 per share, (iii) note warrants that may be exercised into 678,660 shares of common stock at $0.20 - $0.22 per share, (iv) note warrants that may be exercised into 307,000 shares of common stock at $0.10 per share, (v) warrants that may be exercised into 6,595,000 shares of common stock at $0.35 per share, (vi) options that may be exercised into 5,220,000 shares of common stock at $0.21 to $0.50 per share issued to directors, officers and consultants, and (vii) options that may be exercised into 535,000 shares of common stock at $0.30 per share issued to an advisor.  The issuance of shares upon exercise of these options and warrants may result in substantial dilution to the interests of other stockholders and may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.expiring through August 2028.

A low market price may severely limit the potential market for our common stock.Common Stock.

An equity security that trades below a certain price per share is subject to SEC rules requiring additional disclosures by broker-dealers. These rules generally apply to any non-Nasdaq equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions (a “penny stock”). Such rules require the delivery, prior to any penny stock transaction, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated therewith and impose various sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell penny stocks to persons other than established customers and institutional or wealthy investors. For these types of transactions, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and have received the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to the sale. The broker-dealer also must disclose the commissions payable to the broker-dealer, current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock and, if the broker-dealer is the sole market maker, the broker-dealer must disclose this fact and the broker-dealer’s presumed control over the market. Such information must be provided to the customer orally or in writing before or with the written confirmation of trade sent to the customer.


Monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks. Since our common stockCommon Stock trades at a price of less than $5.00 per share, the additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by such requirements could discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions in our common stock.Common Stock.

26 

 

We do not currently intend to pay cash dividends.

We have not declared any dividends since incorporation and do not anticipate that we will do so in the foreseeable future. Our present policy is to retain all available funds for use in our operations and the expansion of our business. Payment of future cash dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our Board and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects and other factors that our Board considers relevant. Accordingly, investors will only see a return on their investment if the value of our securities appreciates.

Control by current stockholders.

The current stockholders have elected the directors and the directors have appointed current executive officers to serve our Company. The voting power of these stockholders could also discourage others from seeking to acquire control of us through the purchase of our common stockCommon Stock which might depress the price of our Common Stock.

There is not now, and there may never be, an active market for our Common Stock.

Shares of our Common Stock have historically been thinly traded. Currently there is a limited, sporadic and highly volatile market for our Common Stock, and no active market for our Common Stock may develop in the future. As a result, our stock price as quoted by the OTCQB may not reflect an actual or perceived value. Moreover, several days may pass before any shares are traded; meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing our common stock.shares at or near ask prices at any given time may be relatively small or non-existent. This situation is attributable to a number of factors, including, but not limited to:

we are a small company that is relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock brokers, institutional investors and others in the investment community that generate or influence sales volume; and

 

stock analysts, stock brokers and institutional investors may be risk-averse and reluctant to follow a company such as ours that may in the future face substantial doubt about the ability to continue as a going concern or to purchase or recommend the purchase of our shares until such time as we become more viable.

Investment

As a result, an investor may find it difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations of the price of, our Common Stock. Accordingly, investors must assume they may have to bear the economic risk of an investment in our Company hasCommon Stock for an indefinite period of time, and may lose their entire investment. There can be no assurance that a high degreemore active market for our Common Stock will develop, or if one should develop, there is no assurance that it will be sustained. This severely limits the liquidity of risk. Before you invest you should carefully considerour Common Stock and would likely have a material adverse effect on the risksmarket price of our Common Stock and uncertainties described below. If anyon our ability to raise additional capital.

We may issue shares of preferred stock.

Our Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 10,000,000 shares of blank check preferred stock at $0.001 par value with designations, rights and preferences determined from time to time by the board of directors. There are currently no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding. Our board of directors is empowered, without stockholder approval, to issue preferred stock with dividend, liquidation, conversion, voting, or other rights which could adversely affect the voting power or other rights of the following risks actually occur, our business, operating results and financial conditionholders of the Common Stock. In the event of issuance, the preferred stock could be harmed andutilized, under certain circumstances, as a method of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control of the value of our stock could go down.Company.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.None.

ITEM 1C. CYBERSECURITY

N/A

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Executive and Field Offices

Offices. Our headquarters are located at 539 El Paso Street, Sierra Blanca, Texas 79851. Our accounting functions are conducted by personnel in Galveston, Texas and Tyler, Texas, Denver, Colorado, all under the supervision of our CFO, Wm Chris Mathers.chief financial officer.

27 

 

Overview of the Round Top Rare Earth-Uranium-Beryllium Project

We areProject. Round Top is currently in the exploration stage and havehas not established that ourthe Round Top Project contains Provenproven mineral reserves or Probable Reservesprobable mineral reserves as defined under SEC Guide 7.Item 1300 of Regulation S-K. The Round Top Project is currently owned by Round Top Development, LLC in which we currently have a 19.611% membership interest.

Description and Access

The Round Top Project is a small mountain, one of a group of five that comprises the Sierra Blanca, located in Hudspeth County approximately eight miles northwest of the town of Sierra Blanca. The property is reached by truck on a private dirt road that turns north off Interstate 10 access road approximately one mile west of the town of Sierra Blanca. A railroad line is located approximately one to three miles from the Round Top Project and a spur line stops at a stone quarry within three miles of the Round Top Project.

28 

 


On March 6, 2013, we purchased the surface lease at the Round Top Project, known as the West Lease, from the Foundation for $500,000 cash and 1,063,830 shares of our common stock. We also agreed to support the Foundation through an annual payment of $45,000 for ten years to support conservation efforts within the Rio Grande Basin and in particular engaging in stewardship of Lake Amistad, a large and well-known fishing lake near Del Rio, Texas. The West Lease comprises approximately 54,990 acres. Most importantly, the purchase of the surface lease gave us unrestricted surface access for the potential development and mining of our Round Top Project. As of the date of this filing the $45,000 payments due in June 2016 and 2017 have not been paid; consequently, we have expensed the value of the West Lease during fiscal 2017. We fully intend to continue with the evaluation of the mineral potential of the property, to ultimately mine the property, and to bring the lease current when funds are available. Expensing the value of the West Lease does not restrict our access to the mineral leases.


Figure 1 - Round Top Location Map

 

Acquisition and OwnershipAugust 2010 Lease

Prospecting Permits

TMRC currently holds prospecting permits covering land in Hudspeth County. The prospecting permits allow for exploration activities on approximately 7,110 acres. Currently, TMRC has yet to complete drilling on lands identified withinIn August 2010, the permits due to the requirement of completing archeological studies. TMRC intends to complete archeological studies in all areas for future exploration. To date, all exploration work has occurred on areas with approved archeological assessments. A summary of the prospecting permits is listed in Table 1 below:

Table 1 TMRC Permit Numbers and Associated Acres

Permit #Acres
M-114639640
M-114640640
M- 114641250
M-114642640
M-114643400
M-114644360
M-114645340
M-115990640
M-115991640
M-115992640
M-115993640
M-115994640
M-115995640


September 2011 Lease

On September 2, 2011, weCompany entered into a new mining lease with the Texas General Land OfficeGLO covering Sections 7 and 18 of Township 7, Block 71 and Section 12 of Block 72, covering approximately 860 acres at Round Top Mountain in Hudspeth County, Texas. The mining lease issued by the Texas General Land Office gives usGLO provided for the right to explore, produce, develop, mine, extract, mill, remove, and market beryllium, uranium, rare earth elements, all other base and precious metals, industrial minerals and construction materials and all other minerals excluding oil, gas, coal, lignite, sulfur, salt, and potash. The term of the lease is nineteen years from the execution date of the lease so long as minerals are produced in paying quantities. This lease was assigned to Round Top in May 2021.

Under the lease, we willRound Top is obligated to pay the State of Texas a lease bonus of $142,518; $44,718 of which wasthe Company previously paid upon the execution of the lease, and $97,800 which will be due when we submitand payable by Round Top upon the submission of a supplemental plan of operations to conduct mining. Upon the sale of minerals removed from the Round Top weProject, Round Top will be required to pay the State of Texas a $500,000 minimum advance royalty.

Thereafter, weRound Top will be required to pay the State of Texas a production royalty equal to eight percent (8%) of the market value of uranium and other fissionable materials removed and sold from Round Top and six and one quarter percent (61/4%) of the market value of all other minerals removed and sold from the Round Top.Top Project.

Thereafter, assuming production ofIf paying quantities hashave not been obtained, weRound Top may pay additional delay rental fees to extend the term of the lease for successive one (1) year periods pursuant to the following schedule:

 Per Acre
Amount
 Total
Amount
   Per Acre
Amount
  Total
Amount
 
September 2, 2015 – 2019  $75  $67,077 
September 2, 2020 – 2024  $150  $134,155   $150  $134,155 
September 2, 2025 – 2029  $200  $178,873   $200  $178,873 

 

In August 2017, we2023, Round Top paid the State of Texas a delay rental to extend the term of $67,077. the lease in an amount equal to $134,155.

November 2011 Lease

OnIn November 1, 2011, wethe Company entered into a mining lease with the State of Texas covering approximately 90 acres more or less, of land that we purchased in September 2011 near our Round Top site.  The deed was recordedcontiguous with Hudspeth County on September 16, 2011.and extending the August 2010 Lease. Under the lease, wethe Company paid the State of Texas a lease bonus of $20,700 which was paid upon the execution of the lease. Upon the sale of minerals removed from the Round Top weProject, Round Top will be required to pay the State of Texas a $50,000 minimum advance royalty. Thereafter, weRound Top will be required to pay the State of Texas a production royalty equal to eight percent (8%) of the market value of uranium and other fissionable materials removed and sold from the Round Top Project and six and one quarter percent (61/4%) of the market value of all other minerals sold from the Round Top.Top Project. The term of the lease is nineteen years from the execution date of the lease so long as minerals are produced in paying quantities. This lease was assigned to Round Top in May 2021.

29

 

Thereafter, assuming production of

Acquisition and Ownership

If paying quantities hashave not been obtained, weRound Top may pay additional delay rental fees to extend the term of the lease for successive one (1) year periods pursuant to the following schedule:

 Per Acre Amount Total
Amount
   Per Acre
Amount
  Total
Amount
 
November 1, 2015 – 2019  $75  $6,750 
November 1, 2020 – 2024  $150  $13,500   $150  $13,500 
November 1, 2025 – 2029  $200  $18,000   $200  $18,000 

 

In October 2017, weAugust 2023, Round Top paid the State of Texas a delay rental to extend the term of the lease in an amount equal to $6,750.  $13,500.


March 2013 Lease

On March 6, 2013, wethe Company purchased the surface lease at the Round Top Project, known as the West Lease, from the Southwest Wildlife and Range Foundation (the “Foundation”)(since renamed the Rio Grande Foundation) for $500,000 cash and 1,063,830 shares of our common stock. Westock valued at $500,000. The Company also agreed to support the Foundation through an annual payment of $45,000 for ten years to support conservation efforts within the Rio Grande Basin and in particular engaging in stewardship of Lake Amistad, a large and well-known fishing lake near Del Rio, Texas.Basin. The West Lease comprises approximately 54,990 acres. Most importantly, theThe purchase of the surface lease gave usprovides unrestricted surface access for the potential development and mining of ourthe Round Top Project. .As of the date of this filing the $45,000 payments due in June 2016 and 2017 have not been paid; consequently, we have expensed the value of theThe West Lease during fiscal 2017. We fully intendwas assigned to continue with the evaluation of the mineral potential of the property, to ultimately mine the property, and to bring the lease current when funds are available. Expensing the value of the West Lease does not restrict our access to the mineral leases.Round Top in May 2021.


October 2014 Surface Option and Water Lease

In October 2014, wethe Company executed an agreementagreements with the Texas General Land OfficeGLO securing the option to purchase the surface rights covering the potential Round Top projectProject mine and plant areas and, separately, a lease to develop the water necessary for the potential Round Top project mine operations.

groundwater lease. The option to purchase the surface rights covers approximately 5,670 acres over the mining lease and the additional acreage should be adequate to site all potential heap leaching and processing operations as currently anticipated by the Company. WeRound Top. Round Top may exercise the option for all or part of the option acreage at any time during the sixteen year primary term of the mineral lease. The option can be kept current by an annual payment of $10,000, which has not been paid as of the date of this filing.$10,000. The purchase price will be the appraised value of the surface at the time of exercising the option.

The ground water lease secures ourthe right to develop the ground water within a 13,120 acre lease area located approximately 4 miles from the Round Top deposit. The lease area contains five existing water wells. It is anticipated that all potential water needs for the Round Top project mine operations would be satisfied by the existing wells covered by this water lease. This lease has an annual minimum production payment of $5,000 prior to production of water for the operation, which has not been paid as of the date of this filing.operation. After initiation of production weRound Top will pay $0.95 per thousand gallons or $20,000 annually, whichever is greater. This lease remains effective as long as the mineral lease is in effect.

Existing Infrastructure

TheThis option and groundwater lease were assigned to Round Top rare earth prospectin May 2021.

March 2021 Purchased the South ½ of Section 45, Block 71, Township 6, T&P RR Survey

This ½ section comprising 320 acres more or less was initially developed inpurchased for a price of $400 per acre, or a total of approximately $128,000. This tract was purchased for siting the late 1980s as a beryllium resource.  As a result, several pieces of equipment weredemonstration plant when it is relocated from its present location at Wheatridge, Colorado. This tract is contiguous with the property when we acquired the lease, some of which we have repaired as described below.  The previous operators had also built out several roads at the prospect site, which we believe are suitable for our current exploration plans.

There exists on theSurface Option area and was assigned to Round Top sitein May 2021.

May 2021 Easements

On May 7, 2021, the Company purchased a 1,115 foot, 10 foot by 10 foot declineroad, water line and power line easement extending slightly over a mile from the surfacewestern boundary of the Water lease to the southeastern corner of the Section 45 tract. This easement completes the arrangements for the main access road from State Highway 111, across the Water Lease and into the Surface Option area, and was assigned to Round Top prospect. There are steel sets every five feet, in some cases less, and the entire working is lagged with timber. There are “escape holes” at intervals to allow personnel to avoid equipment. The escape holes are all in good operating condition.  There is also a 36 foot steel ventilation line in place that runs for approximately 75 feet into the prospect. There is a 125 hp axial plane ventilation fan in place.  We have leveled the fan and rehabilitated the control panel, and have operated this ventilation system during the evaluation of the historic Cabot-Cyprus work. We intend to install a “soft start” motor starter switch for the vent fan in the future in order to be able to use a 100kw generator.May 2021.

A bag house is also located on the property that will need its electronic controls rehabilitated and modernized and filters installed. There is a 6” Victaulic compressed air line extending from the compressor station outside to the faces. There are numerous valves at strategic locations underground. There is one 2’ steel Victaulic water line for drill water and an additional partly plastic Victaulic water line for dust suppression sprayers, which also has sprayers in place.

There is electric cable from the portal to the face and a switch box underground. Some additional switching gear will need to be installed at the portal.  The mine portal has a sturdy locking steel door in place that we have reconditioned.

There is a 500 barrel (23,000 gal) water tank below the mine dump for water to be hauled in and stored. This tank appears to be in good shape. The water line from the tank to the mine portal is missing and will have to be replaced. The water system will need a submersible pump, switching gear and approximately 1000 ft of 2” poly line to render the water system serviceable.

The nearest population center to the Round Top Project is Sierra Blanca, Texas. The town of Sierra Blanca is approximately six miles to the southeast of the Round Top Project site. The population was 533 in 2000 and 510 during the 2007 census. Skilled mining labor and support could be found in El Paso, approximately 85 miles to the northeast.


A major rail line parallels Interstate 10 approximately three to four miles west and south of the mine site. Approximately three miles from the Project site is a commercial rock quarry in operation which produces ballast for the railroad. The rock quarry operation has a rail road spur which is approximately two to three miles from the Project.

Power is currently supplied to Sierra Blanca through El Paso Electric Services. El Paso Electric Services has approximately 1,643 megawatts of generating capacity. As the greater power needs of a floatation operation have been eliminated by the proposed heap leach mine plan the existing 69 kV is thought to be adequate to supply the envisioned heap leach operation.

Water for the project may be obtained from a well field approximately 3 miles east of the mine site. In October of 2014, we executed a lease with the Texas General Land Office to develop the water necessary for the potential Round Top project mine operations. The ground water lease secures our right to develop the ground water within a 13,120 acre lease area located approximately 4 miles from the Round Top deposit. The lease area contains five existing water wells. It is anticipated that all potential water needs for the Round Top project mine operations would be satisfied by the existing wells covered by this water lease. This lease has an annual minimum production payment of $5,000 prior to production of water for the operation, which has not been paid as of the date of this filing. After initiation of production we will pay $0.95 per thousand gallons or $20,000 annually, whichever is greater. This lease remains effective as long as the mineral lease is in effect.

This well field was originally developed to supply water for a proposed real estate project in the late 1970’s. One of the existing wells is reported to have pump tested 950 gallons per minute and another 450 gallons per minute. This water is high enough in total dissolved solids to not meet drinking water standards, thus there is no competition for its use. The quality of the water is expected to be adequate for process water needs and the water will require treatment to be potable.


Geology

The Round Top Project area lies within the Texas Lineament Zone or Trans-Pecos Trend. The lineament is a northwest trending structural zone where Laramide thrust faulting followed by basin and range normal faulting were active. Tertiary igneous activity is also associated with the lineament zone, both intrusive and extrusive.

Locally the project area is characterized by five Tertiary micrograniterhyolite bodies that intruded Cretaceous sedimentary rocks. The microgranitesrhyolites occur as laccoliths, mushroom-shaped bodies emplaced at relatively shallow depths. At the current erosional levels, laccoliths form resistant peaks with relief up to 2,000 feet. The microgranites, which are called rhyolites in the literature, are enriched with various metals which may or may not be economical to recover. The rare earth elements are located with-inwithin the intrusive rhyolite body.

Tertiary Diorite which predate the microgranites are intruded the cretaceous section.  The diorites occur as sills, five to 100 feet thick and less frequently as dikes and plugs.  Sedimentary rocks exposed in the area are middle to upper Cretaceous limestoneslimestone shales and sandstones. The limestone, where it is in contact with the microgranites, is the host for Beryllium and uraniumfluorspar mineralization.

30

 

The Round Top Project was initially developed

Initial exploration took place in the late 1980’s as a beryllium resource.mid-1980’s. During the course of the berylliumthis exploration, approximately 200 drill holes were drilled, targeting potential beryllium mineralization which penetrated varying thicknesses of the rhyolite volcanic rock that makes up the mass of Round Top Mountain and caps the beryllium-uranium deposits which occur in the underlying limestone; some 50 more holes were drilled on Little Round Top, Sierra Blanca and Little Blanca Mountains.Mountain.

The Texas Bureau of Economic Geology, working with the project geologists, conducted an investigation of the rhyolite to better understand its rare metal content. This research shows that the rhyolite laccoliths at Sierra Blanca are enriched in a variety of REEs, lithium gallium, beryllium, hafnium, and other rare elements such as tantalum, niobium, thorium and lithium.zirconium. They analyzed a series of samples from outcrop and drill holes and studied the geochemistry and mineralogy of the rhyolite. The results of their research were published in the GSA, Geological Society of America, Special Paper 246, 1990.

Mineralization

Round Top rhyolite is enriched in Heavy Rare Earth Elements (HREEs). Statistical review of the current data shows that an estimated 70% of the total REE’s grade being HREEs.REEs, lithium, gallium, hafnium and beryllium. REE mineralization occurs primarily as disseminated microcrystals of varieties of fluorite (such as yttrium-rich yttrofluorite) where HREEs have substituted for calcium, and as other REE-bearing accessory minerals.. REE minerals occur mainly in vugs and as crystal coatings, suggesting late-stage crystallization from an incompatible element-rich fluid.

The Round Top rhyolite was divided into five different alteration phases based on the intensity of hematitic and hydrothermal alteration: red rhyolite, pink rhyolite, tan rhyolite; brown rhyolite and gray rhyolite. Hematitic alteration is a replacement of the magnetite by hematite and gives the rhyolite a red to pink color. Hydrothermal alteration was late and gives the rhyolite a tan to brown color. Mostly unaltered, gray rhyolite was also documented.Alhambra Project

Initial geochemical testwork, presented in Section 13, suggests that the gray and pink rhyolite units have the highest REE content, averaging between 554 and 615 parts per million (ppm) total REE + Yttrium (Y). Red and tan rhyolites, which may be strongly vapor-phase altered, contain about 8% lower abundance of REE and the brown rhyolite, which may be altered hydrothermally or by groundwater, contains about 23% less REE than the gray and pink varieties.


Metallurgy

The Round Top Project rhyolite requires further evaluation of its mineralogical makeup and economic modeling to determine the appropriate course for potential future commercial development.  However, the size of this rhyolite deposit, the high percentage (68-72%) of heavy rare earth elements to the total rare earth elements and the leaching characteristics of the host rock could make a heap leach mine a viable option at lower capital costs than the mine plan described in our current PEA released June 22 2012. The Preliminary Economic Assessment is mentioned here for informational purposes only and is not incorporated herein by reference.

On October 27, 2011, we announced that we had completed Phase I of its metallurgical testing and characterization.  This mineralogical study reconfirmed that the rare earth minerals are finely disseminated throughout the rhyolite host rock. Based on the initial ore characterization, this testing reconfirms the simplistic rare earth element mineral associations, which suggests favorable metallurgical processing options. Phase II was focused on pre-concentration evaluation and other diagnostic testing including acid leaching of the rare earth minerals.  The results of this testing is described in the PEA.


On May 8, 2013, we announced independent confirmation of potential favorable heap leach characteristics, based on coarse leach testing at an independent lab.  The results are summarized below:

 LaCePrNdSmEuGdTbDyHo
Ore Gradeppmppmppmppmppmppmppmppmppmppm
 319812.234.811.10.611.53.7730.77.98
Recovery 121658.425.38.6    <0.49.53.225.36.37 
Recovery 216557.722.88.30.49.33.1124.76.2
Average Recovery18.5608.0524.058.45NA 9.43.155256.285 
% Recovery60%61%66%69%76%67%82%84%81%79%

 ErTmLuYbYThUBeLi 
Ore Gradeppmppmppmppmppmppmppmppmppm 
 33.87.379.1257218183.540.732.2410  
Recovery 125.85.095.3236.4185146.5206.5270 
Recovery 225.15.045.3336.5184143.921.54.8270 
Average Recovery25.455.0655.32536.45184.5145.220.755.65270  
% Recovery75%69%58%64%85%79%51%18%66% 

*

La=Lanthanum, Ce= Cerium, Pr= Praseodymium, Nd= Neodymium, Sm= Samarium, Eu= Europium, Gd= Gadolinium, Tb= Terbium, Dy=Dysprosium, Ho= Holmium, Er= Erbium, Tm= Thulium, Lu= Lutetium, Yb= Ytterbium, Y= Yttrium, Th=Thorium, U= Uranium, Be= Beryllium, Li= Lithium

A sieved 2 to 4 mm (~1/8th to 1/4 inch) fraction of the composite rhyolite sample being used for all metallurgical testing was submitted. This sample was leached in 14.7 gm/l (14.7% by wt) sulfuric acid at room temperature for two weeks.

On July 16, 2013, we announced the results of an independent heap leach scoping study static leach test which confirmed recoveries up to 79.9%.  The test results indicated the following:

1.Comparison of the calculated heads and the assayed heads for the elements of interest are similar. Hence, it is reasonable to conclude that the minerals are fairly uniformly distributed in the deposit.

2.Extractions for Yttrium varied from 20.8 to 61.1% for the different sizes with a combined extraction of 48.6%.  Extractions for Dysprosium varied from 23.8% t o57.7% with a combined extraction of 44.5%.

3.The highest extractions for all minerals of interest were in the 2 in X 1/2 in size fractions. The extractions dropped significantly in the minus 1/2in size fraction.

4.The acid consumption was reasonable for the coarse size fractions (>1/2 inch) and more than doubled for the minus 1/2inch material.


On September 30, 2013, we announced the results of preliminary column leach testing.  Preliminary column leach testing of Round Top rhyolite crushed to 1/2 inch has yielded the following recoveries of the heavy rare earth elements (terbium and heavier) plus yttrium. These tests were run for 60 days with 7.5 wt. percent sulfuric acid. Recoveries of the heavy rare earth elements plus Yttrium were as follows:

 Yttrium (Y):91%
 Dysprosium (Dy):87%
 Lutetium (Lu):67%
 Holmium (Ho):86%
 Erbium (Er):83%
 Thulium (Tm):77%
 Ytterbium (Yb):74%
 Terbium (Tb):87%


While concurrent work on the froth floatation and agitated leaching of the concentrates yielded acceptable recoveries, the whole rock column leach testing indicates better overall recoveries at potentially lower capital and operating costs. This rock also shows other very favorable heap leach characteristics with ore slump of 0.18%, ore wt. loss of 2.25% and retained moisture of 6.4%.

Work will continue to optimize the recoveries of the heavy rare earth elements (HREE) and yttrium as well as potentially valuable by-products such as uranium, beryllium and lithium and the light rare earth elements (LREE).

Project Exploration History and Timeline

The Round Top rare earths and uranium-beryllium prospects were initially drilled in 1984 and 1985, during which time the ore body known as the “West End Ore Zone” was discovered by Cabot Corporation.  In subsequent years, Cyprus Minerals Corporation took over the exploration activities.  Cyprus drilled additional exploration holes and also put an adit into the ore zone where 1,115 feet of underground workings were driven.  Cyprus developed the underground workings in order to obtain bulk samples for pilot plant testing and beryllium oxide concentrate generation.  Cyprus ultimately put the project on hold as a result of poor beryllium market conditions.  Cyprus eventually allowed the lease with the state of Texas to lapse.

In March 2011,November 2021, the Company completed an analysis of 1,103 drill samples fromentered into a mineral exploration and option agreement with Santa Fe Gold Corporation (“Santa Fe”). Under the 1984-88 drilling program initially conducted onoption agreement, the Round Top Project by third party operators. All orCompany and Santa Fe plan to pursue, negotiate and subsequently enter into a portion of forty-six out of an estimated two hundred fifty existing drill holes have been re-loggedjoint venture agreement to jointly explore and re-analyzed. The rare earth element and other metals are consistent with the original studydevelop a target silver property to be selected by the Texas Bureau of Geology that was published in the Geological Society of America, Special Paper 246 in 1990. This study first described the rare metal content of the large mass of intrusive igneous rock that makes up the body of Round Top Mountain,Company among patented and is the basis for our interest in this deposit. The nine drill holes cited below were selected because they are widely distributed and roughly define an area approximately six thousand feetunpatented mining claims held by four thousand feetSanta Fe within the approximate seven thousand foot known diameterBlack Hawk Mining District in Grant County, New Mexico. Completion of the intrusive rhyolite body. They intersected the entire body of the rhyolite.

On October 27, 2011, we announced favorable results of our Phase I metallurgical testing and characterization that reconfirmed that the rare earth minerals are finely disseminated throughout the rhyolite host rock at our Round Top Project.

On November 8, 2011, we announced that our supplementary operating plan to expand exploration activities at our Round Top Project had been approved by the Texas General Land Office (GLO); the expanded development and exploration drill plan now calls for an additional 40 drill holes and 4 diamond core holes for an estimated planned drilled footage of 20,000 feet.

On November 10, 2011, we announced that Gustavson Associates, LLC, a subsidiary of Walsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers and its parent company, Ecology and Environment, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEI) had been contracted to perform the scoping study at the Round Top Project.  On June 15, 2012, we issued a press release regarding the results of our Preliminary Economic Assessment.

On June 22, 2012, we published our PEA for our Round Top Project, entitled “NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment Round Top Project, Sierra Blanca, Texas,” dated June 22, 2012, effective as of May 15, 2012.

On October 3, 2012, our management released updated economic projections related to various revisions to the proposed mine plan presented in the PEA.

Throughout 2013, management focused on developing metallurgical processes and refining the mine plan in anticipation of releasing an updated PEA.


On March 6, 2013, we purchased the surface lease at the Round Top Project, known as the West Lease, from the Foundation for $500,000 cash and 1,063,830 shares of our common stock. We also agreed to support the Foundation through an annual payment of $45,000 for ten years to support conservation efforts within the Rio Grande Basin and in particular engaging in stewardship of Lake Amistad, a large and well-known fishing lake near Del Rio, Texas. The West Lease comprises approximately 54,990 acres. Most importantly, purchase of the surface lease gave us unrestricted surface access for the potential development and mining of our Round Top Project. As of the date of this filing the $45,000 payments due in June 2016 and 2017 have not been paid; consequently, we have expensed the value of the West Lease during fiscal 2017. We fully intend to continue with the evaluation of the mineral potential of the property, to ultimately mine the property, and to bring the lease current when funds are available. Expensing the value of the West Lease does not restrict our access to the mineral leases.

On May 8, 2013, we released testing results by an independent laboratory of the leaching characteristic of the rhyolite at our Round Top Project, which demonstrates characteristics that may be favorable to heap leach mining at the Round Top Project. These leaching characteristics are described in greater detail below under the section heading “Properties – Round Top Project – Metallurgy”.

On September 30, 2013 we released the results on column leach testing by an independent laboratory and announced our intention to issue a revised PEA based on a heap leach operation designed to produce approximately 2,500 tons per year of heavy rare earth elements plus yttrium. The column leach testing results are described in greater detail below under the section heading “Properties – Round Top Project – Metallurgy”.

On December 23, 2013, we published a revised version of the June 2012 Preliminary Economic Assessment (the “Revised PEA”) based on a 20,000 tonne per day heap leach operation using a conventional element separation plant. The mineralized material estimate was recalculated to include uranium, niobium, tantalum and tin. The Revised PEA assesses the potential economic viability of the simplified and “scaled down” operation which we believejoint venture agreement, if any, is a much better fit with the present rare earth market.

On June 22, 2017 we announced the establishment of American Mineral Reclamation LLC. This subsidiary has the mission to seek out and develop lower cost projects involving metals and mineral recovery and production from coal by-products, acid mine drainage waters and sludges, mine waste and tailings, industrial wastewater and recovery of strategic metals from scrap from various sources. In addition to REE and scandium we intend to include other important “tech” metals such as Lithium, Cobalt, Vanadium, Gallium and others as conditions dictate. We have executed a co-operation agreement to work jointly with Inventure Renewals.


Cautionary Note to Investors:The PEA and Revised PEA have been prepared in accordance with Canadian National Instrument 43-101 — Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (the “CIM”) —CIM Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, adopted by the CIM Council, as amended.The Company has voluntarily had the PEA and Revised PEA prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 but the Company is not subject to regulation by Canadian regulatory authorities and no Canadian regulatory authority has reviewed the PEA or Revised PEA or passed upon its accuracy or compliance with NI 43-101. The terms “mineral reserve”, “proven mineral reserve” and “probable mineral reserve” are Canadian mining terms as defined in accordance with NI 43-101. These definitions differ from the definitions in SEC Industry Guide 7 under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Under SEC Industry Guide 7 standards, a “final” or “bankable” feasibility study is required to report reserves, the three-year historical average price is used in any reserve or cash flow analysis to designate reserves and the primary environmental analysis or report must be filed with the appropriate governmental authority. In addition, the terms “mineral resource”, “measured mineral resource”, “indicated mineral resource” and “inferred mineral resource” are defined in NI 43-101; however, these terms are not defined terms under SEC Industry Guide 7 and are normally not permitted to be used in reports and registration statements filed with the SEC. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves. “Inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists or is economically or legally mineable. Disclosure of “contained ounces” in a resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, the SEC normally only permits issuers to report mineralization that does not constitute “reserves” by SEC Industry Guide 7 standards as in place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures. Accordingly, information in the PEA and Revised PEA contains descriptions of our mineral deposits that may not be comparable to similar information made public by United States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements under the United States federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. Our project as described in the PEA and Revised PEA currently does not contain any known proven or probable ore reserves under SEC Industry Guide 7 reporting standards. U.S. investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in the Registrant’s latest reports and registration statements filed with the SEC.U.S. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any defined resources in these categories will ever be converted into SEC Guide 7 compliant reserves.

Current and Planned Metallurgical Activities

Metallurgical research donesuccessful outcome of a multi-phase exploration plan leading to the publication of our Revised PEA of December 2013 has shown the possibility of heap leaching at the Round Top Project. This first step of “dissolving” the REE bearing mineral is the critical factor in the determination to develop REE projects. The type of solvent, its strength and other conditioning necessary to render the elements soluble is, in our opinion, what most affects the ultimate feasibility of a project. TMRC has been able to extract a high percentage of the REE and other elements from the mineralized rock at the Round Top Project, and test work to date also indicates it can be done easily and at projected low operating costs.

Process development was scheduled as follows:

Stage 1a.Treat the primary leach solution to remove the impurity elements and to produce a feedstock solution at concentrations and flow rate acceptable to feed the processing plant.

Stage 1b. Desktop study of the CAPEX and OPEX of the plant envisioned at Round Top.

Stage 2a. Bench scale production of high purity separated elements


Stage 2b. Optimize leach recoveries of REE and other elements by large scale column leach testing. Primary leach solution produced during this phase will be used to refine the CIX/CIC recoveries of the various heavy elements and to develop methods for recovering the “light” elements, lithium in particular, by a variety of techniques including evaporation “salt out” and membrane filtration.

Stage 2c. Pilot plant testing using trial leach pads with solutions to be processed at the Tuscaloosa facility of Inventure Renewals.

Stage 3. Publication of a bankable feasibility study to be undertaken in the near future by the Company. Under the contemplated terms of the CIX/CIC processing plant.

Results to Date

Stage 1a. The Round Top pregnant leach solution (PLS) obtained by leaching the crushed ore with dilute sulfuric acid extracts the rare earth elements at high recoveries but also recovers high concentrations of aluminum, calcium, magnesium, iron, potassium and sodium. The PLS produced from the leach operation is expected to be at flow rates on the order of 600 gallons per minute with concentrations of rare earth elements in the range of 1,000 to 3,500 parts per million (ppm). First experimental run produced a solution that averaged approximately 1,000 ppm (.1%) rare earth and approximately 30,000 ppm (3%) impurities, a ratio of 30:1 impurities to REE. The Stage 1a processing was able to change this ratio to approximately 0.3:1 impurities to REE. This level of impurity rejection greatly exceed our target expectations and we believe demonstrates that the Round Top PLS can be relatively easily and economically processed into a feedstock compatible with any type of refining plant.

We believe that accomplishing this step of directly extracting the REE from the PLS without prior treatment or conditioning has accomplished the most difficult part of process design. 


Stage 1a. The desktop economic model is kept current by factoring in any project progress and any variation of product mix and price as the project develops.

Stage 2a. The bench-scale separation of the rare earth elements into groups was completed in May 2015, through the rejection of the low value rare earth elements lanthanum and cerium from the Stage 1a solution.

Stage 2b. In late 2015 TMRC (then TRER) applied for and was granted a contract from the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Broad Agency Announcement – 2016-2017-01 for bench scale IX and IC purification and separation of REE from primary leach solution derived from crushed Round Top rock, which was successfully completed in mid-2016. This DLA sponsored work has accomplished Stage 2, milestone 1. This work resulted in the production of 99.999+ yttrium, 99.99% ytterbium and 99.999+% of an undisclosed REE element.

Current Status of the Round Top Project

Metallurgical development at Round Top is suspended pending the acquisition of additional financing. When started, this work will complete Stage 2 and is designed to result in a bankable feasibility study.

Costs

At the end of fiscal year 2017 we had incurred exploration costs at the Round Top Project of approximately $11.8 million.  In the fiscal year ending August 31, 2017 there have been minimal exploration costs.  

At the present time based on our current understanding of the project, we estimate the funding need to complete Stage 3 of the Round Top Project to be approximately $6.5 million including Corporate G&A. This estimate may and probably will change as more data is acquired.

Metal Recovery Methods

There are two options for extracting the REE from the leach solution, solvent extraction (SX) and ion exchange (IX).

SX is widely used in the REE industry. SX is a process whereby the water/acid leach solution is mixed with a kerosene based solution containing the active organic agents (extractants) and then allowed to settle and separate into the water and oil phase. The extractants carried in the kerosene selectively remove the REE’s and other sought after elements from the water/acid solution leaving the impurities in the original solution. The economic elements move from the aqueous sulfuric acid leach solution into the kerosene solution and are then transferred from the kerosene solution back into an aqueous solution, this time a hydrochloric acid solution at higher concentrations. This process is repeated over and over until all the individual REE’s are separated into their purified individual oxides and then sold.

IX is a process whereby the leach solution is passed through a tank or column containing small beads of an ion exchange resin. The ion exchange resin has the active extracting agents embedded within the beads. The resin beads adsorb the metal ions of interest from the leach solution. When the beads are loaded to their maximum carrying capacity the loaded column is exchanged for a column containing fresh beads. The elements “loaded” on the resin are then stripped back into another aqueous solution, again hydrochloric acid, at high concentrations for further processing. The column with the “stripped” beads is then ready to be recycled back into the process. In the IX process the stripped beads are normally loaded with hydrogen ions which, when exchanged with the REEs in the PLS, does not affect the acidity of the solution, thus the acid is also recycled back into the process, further lowering the operational costs.


The aluminum, iron and other elements can be chemically precipitated and removed by raising the pH and adding other elements such as magnesium. The “cleaned” solution is then further refined by SX or IX methods. Precipitation has been successfully used to clean the Round Top solutions but it results in approximately a 20% loss of some of the REE via co-precipitation with the less desirable elements. TMRC consultants are confident with additional work these losses will be reduced to 15% or lower. A disadvantage of this procedure is that most or all of the acid is neutralized and lost. Developing a procedure to use SX or IX to remove the REEs directly from the PLS will improve overall recoveries, simplify the process and significantly improve the operational economics.

SX has the advantage of being the process used in other REE operations, thus there is a considerable base of knowledge and experience to be relied on. We believe it has some disadvantages, however. SX plants, while being simple in concept, consist of many repetitive stages which result in a relatively large operation with many steps which in turn require close control and supervision. They are both labor and capital intensive.

IX has the advantage of being simpler and the plants physically much smaller. IX also is more forgiving operationally because it is less sensitive to variations in flow rate and REE grade than SX. Both capital and operating costs are generally lower than equivalent SX plants. However, IX has not, to date, been applied to an REE operation.

Our joint venture with K-Tech has the goal of developing an IX process for REE operations. K-Tech has wide experience with continuous ion exchange and continuous ion chromatography separation of rare earth and other elements from phosphate leach solutions. Insofar as phosphate leach solutions are chemically similar to the primary leach solution produced from leaching Round Top rhyolite, the decision was made to test the Round Top PLS using K-Tech’s process.

The process itself can be summarized as follows: In the first step the raw, high volume, high impurity, low REE grade PLS from the leached rock is converted to a relatively clean, high-grade sulfate solution. This is accomplished by loading the PLS onto a strong cat-ionic resin which, in the case of the Round Top PLS produces about a 4.5 to 1 concentration over the PLS. The resin is then subjected to a “crowding” step whereby most of the impurity elements are forced off the resin, followed by a gradational elution step where the resin is regenerated by sequentially stronger sulfuric acid whereby almost all the remaining impurities are first removed by the weak acid and then the REE themselves removed by strong acid.

The next step, now in progress, will employ CIC to produce 3 high purity products, a light rare earth solution, a mid-range rare earth product solution, and a heavy rare earth solution consisting of the elements terbium and those heavier, plus yttrium. The solution from the first step is fed to and loaded onto the resin as an acid sulfate solution. Once loaded and washed, the column is eluted by a chelating solution which causes the individual REE, because of the small differences in their cation attraction properties, to separate and exit the column at different times. The 3 classes are determined by splitting the streams based on their exit times.

The third step, the element separation stage, consists of more precise and slower reiterations of step two where the elements are tapped individually as they exit the column. High purity is achieved by repeating the process through several columns. The only limitation in the purity is the number of times the process is repeated. All solutions are recirculated, so there is no process loss.

CIX/CIC technology holds promise of revolutionizing the processing and separation of rare earth elements from their ores and then individually. Lower capital and operating costs, simplicity and flexibility, smaller size, and potential for lessening environmental risk are the decisive features recommending this technology. CIX/CIC has a long and well-established track record in other extractive industries, and relies on readily available equipment, resins, and reagents. There is nothing proprietary or “tailor made” in either the equipment, resins, or reagents used in this process.


Work completed in December 2014 has shown that the dilute REE bearing sulfate leach solution can be efficiently treated to produce a purified solution exceeding specifications for feedstock for a separation plant employing either a solvent extraction (SX) or a continuous ion exchange process. We regard the successful completion of Phase 1 of Stage 1 a technological breakthrough in that we were able use conventional ion exchange procedures (CIX) employing readily available, mass produced ion exchange resin to produce the feedstock solution from an impure low grade leach solution. This was step one of a three step program whose objective is to produce 4-9’s (99.99%) pure separated rare earth elements in either oxide or carbonate form.

After the Stage 1 processing, accomplished in January 2015, separated the REE’s from the pregnant leach solution (PLS), resulting in a relatively pure, concentrated mixed rare earths feedstock solution at flow rates suitable for feeding to either a solvent extraction (SX) plant or, as planned by TMRC, to a CIC plant work continued to define stages 2 and three. Uranium in the sulfate feedstock solution was not detected by ICP-MS analysis, inferring that neither it nor the chemically similar thorium is captured in Stage 1 and does not enter the REE processing plant.

The first part of stage 2 refining was achieved in May 2015. This involved the splitting of the feedstock solution from Stage 1 into two parts: (a) a low value branch consisting of lanthanum and cerium that could be warehoused, or sold at a discount; and (b) a high value branch consisting of the remaining rare earths profile (plus yttrium),which can be  further refined.


The overall bench procedure used was to (1) produce a pregnant leach solution (PLS)  by irrigating crushed ore from the Round Top deposit with dilute sulfuric acid in columns set up in K-Tech’s testing facilities; (2) process this PLS in the initial CIX Stage 1 system to remove the rare earth elements (REEs) from the PLS; (3) feed the rare earth solution to the initial step within the stage 2  ion chromatography (IC) testing system for further rare earths isolation and impurity rejection; (4) further processing to separate the contained rare earths into separate selected groups.  This operation is carried out so that the first step is to isolate the lanthanum and cerium.

Using this procedure, K-Tech has produced a mids/heavies steam with a lanthanum/cerium content of less than 8% of the total rare earths present. The rare earth elements that TMRC considers economically important,i.e.praseodymium, neodymium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, and yttrium make up approximately 68% of this product stream. This low lanthanum/cerium solution could then be immediately treated to produce a marketable mids/heavies (M/H) rare earth concentrate for sale to other rare earth producers or consumers. Work continues to further improve the efficiency of this step.

Alternatively, the resulting praseodymium/neodymium plus mid and heavy product stream from the stage 2 system could then be further refined in Stage 2 and 3 to ultimately produce selected individual high purity rare earth oxides. Rare earths which are not separated to individual products could be stockpiled as a concentrate for possible future processing, based on developing market conditions, either as individual elemental products or as selected heavy rare earth mixtures.

Most importantly, the materials used in the K-Tech separation processes are non-toxic, non-flammable and readily available from multiple suppliers, in large quantities and at competitive prices, thus limiting single source risks and dependence on a sole supplier of critical materials needed for the process. The principal equipment used in the production process is also commercially available and does not require specialty engineering or manufacturing. TMRC’s confidence in K-Tech’s ability to scale the process up to full commercial volumes is supported by their wide experience in the application of these same materials and processing techniques in other large-scale industrial separation processes. These include food; fertilizer; industrial chemical; hydrometallurgical; bioprocessing; and other applications requiring continuous processing techniques using ion exchange and ion chromatography as the basis for component separations. This assertion will be borne out in subsequent pilot plant testing where much larger quantities of feedstock will be tested.

The K-Tech JV

The striking success of this process led TMRC to propose a processing joint venture to introduce this technology to the larger rare earth industry. In July TMRC and K-Tech signed a definitiveproposed joint venture agreement, venture to develop, refine and market K-Tech’s Continuous Ion Exchange (CIX) and Continuous Ion Chromatography (CIC) technology as it applies mostly to the extraction of rare earth elements (REE) from native ores. The JV will license the technology to TMRC, as well as other rare earth production companies.  Subject to agreement by TMRC, the JV may also elect to build and operate processing facilities to separate and purify mixed rare earth concentrates into individual purified rare earth oxides for other rare earth production companies in addition to TMRC.

On July 15, 2015, we entered into an operating agreement (“Operating Agreement”) with K-Tech, to formalize our joint venture company, Reetech, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Reetech”), for the purposes of developing, refining and marketing K-Tech’s CIX/CIC process pursuant to the February 24, 2015 letter of intent with K-Tech. Pursuant to the Operating Agreement, K-Tech holds an initial interest of 97.21% of Reetech for the contribution of its technology pursuant to a license to Reetech (the “Reetech License) and TMRC holds an initial interest of 2.79% pursuant to its contribution of cash payment of $391,000 to the prior development of the contributed Technology for the purposes of the joint venture. TMRC has the ability to earn a 49.9% interest in Reetech by contributing up to $7.0 million in cash contributions upon the satisfaction of certain development milestones. Reetech is governed by a board of managers comprised of three managers: one manager appointed by the Company one manager appointed by K-Techwould be project operator and one manager appointed by mutual agreement of the Company and K-Tech.


In connection with the execution of the Operating Agreement, K-Tech granted to Reetech the Reetech License.  The Reetech License is a perpetual license regarding K-Tech’s CIX/CIC process within the field of useinitially own 50.5% of the joint venture for the production of rare earths and other products of value. Additionally, in connection with the executionwhile Santa Fe would initially own 49.5%. Additional terms of the Operating Agreement, Reetech granted to TMRC a perpetual license to use the technology within the field of use of the Reetech License for the development and operation of TMRC’s projects, including the TMRC’s Round Top project (“TMRC License”). Use of the TMRC License granted to TMRC is contingent upon TMRC paying to Reetech a one-time fee of $5 million at startup of the initial processing plant.

On October 18, 2015, we entered into an amendment agreement (the “Amendment”), effective August 27, 2015, with K-Tech, regarding certain amendments to the Operating Agreement.  Concurrently with the execution of the Amendment, TMRC, K-Tech and Reetech entered into amendments to the Reetech License and the TMRC License.

Pursuant to the Amendment, K-Tech has agreed to amend the Agreement to change the conditions upon which TMRC may earn its 49.9% membership percentage interest in Reetech through special capital contributions.  The Amendment provides that TMRC may now earn additional membership percentage interests in Reetech, up to the maximum percentage interest of 49.9%, through both (i) the cash contributions towards development of the Technology upon the occurrence of certain development milestones (same as in the Agreement prior to Amendment) and (ii) by TMRC being the procuring cause of third-party business for Reetech, in which case TMRC will be credited with capital contributions on a dollar-for-dollar basis for the revenue generated by such third-party business.  To be the “procuring cause” of business, Reetech and the third-party business client must have been brought together and the third-party business client must have become a client of Reetech as the result of the continuous efforts of TMRC.


In consideration of the expansion of TMRC’s right to earn additional membership percentage interests in Reetech, TMRC and K-Tech have further amended the Agreement to provide the following:

The Amendment provides that until such time as TMRC has been credited with the cumulative contribution to Reetech of either (i) $2.0 million in capital contributions made by TMRC, (ii) $3.5 million in collected revenue from third-party business clients of which TMRC was the procuring cause (as defined in the Amendment), or (iii) a combination of (i) and (ii) that total $3.5 million, one manager shall be appointed by TMRC and the remaining two managers shall be appointed by K-Tech. Following such contribution conditions being met, the Agreement will revert back to its original manager appointment provisions.

The Agreement has been amended to provide that until such time as TMRC shall have earned its 49.9% interest in Reetech, K-Tech shall supervise the business of Reetech and K-Tech shall be the sole recipient of any profits realized from the business of Reetech.

The Amended TMRC License amends the one-time license fee payable by TMRC to Reetech for the use of the technology within the field of use by TMRC for its projects.  Under the Amended TMRC License, TMRC will pay a one-time fee of $5.0 million payable at plant start-up for the annual (calendar year) production of up to 3,000 metric tons of rare earth oxides.  In the event that TMRC subsequently desires to produce more than 3,000 metric tons, TMRC agrees to pay Reetech an additional market-based license feejoint venture are expected to be negotiated by TMRCbetween the Company and Reetech before TMRC exceeds the 3,000 metric ton annual limit.

The operating agreement between TMRC and K-Tech is still in effect, but due to the inactivity of our Round Top project, there has been no ongoing advancement under the operating agreement as of August 31, 2017.

Based on the success of this process, TMRC, in conjunction with its joint venture partner K-Tech Inc., submitted a proposal to the Defense Logistics Agency of the Department of Defense to employ CIX/CIC to conduct research to demonstrate, at the bench scale level, the ability to separate and refine yttrium (Y) oxide to a minimum of 99.999% purity, ytterbium (Yb) oxide to a minimum of 99.99% purity and an undisclosed oxide to a minimum of 99.999% purity, using continuous ion exchange (CIX) and continuous ion chromatography (CIC).

Northeast Pennsylvania REE and Scandium Project

On June 28, 2016 TMRC executed a Memorandum of understanding with Pagnotti Enterprises Inc. of Wilkes Barre, Pennsylvania, owners of the Jeddo Coal Co., whereby under specified terms TMRC could lease one or more of Jeddo’s deposits locatedSanta Fe in the anthracite region of northeast Pennsylvania. Research by the Department of Energy (DOE) has shown that these coal deposits and the sandstones and siltstones immediately associated with them contain anomalously high values of rare earth and of particular interest, Scandium. The DOE research to date has indicatedfuture. There can be no assurance that the rare earth can be efficiently extracted from pulverized rock using ammonium sulfate as the lixiviant. TMRC is in the process of preparing an application forCompany and Santa Fe will enter into a federal grant to design and construct a continuous ion exchange/continuous ion chromatography (CIX/CIC) pilot plant to be delivered to a designated project area in the Appalachian cold province. TMRC and its co-applicants, K-Tech, Inventure Renewables, of Tuscaloosa, Alabama and Penn State University are proposing to plan, develop, design and install the CIX/CIC pilot plant at one of the Jeddo Coal properties. The grant was awarded in March 2017 to a consortium consisting of Inventure Renewables, Penn State, K-Tech and TMRC with Inventure being the principal investigator in the consortium. Funding began in September 2017.formal join venture agreement.

Under the terms of the Memorandumoption agreement, the Company plans to conduct a district-wide evaluation among the patented and unpatented claims held by Santa Fe, consisting of Understanding (MOU) signed 28 June 2016, TMRC had a six month term to performgeologic mapping, sampling, trenching, radiometric surveying, geophysics, drilling and/or other methods as warranted. Based on the necessary due diligencedistrict-wide evaluation, the Company would designate one 80-acre tract as the “project area” and to technicallycommence detailed exploration work. The property covered in the option agreement is approximately 1,300 acres and economically evaluate the properties. Upon executioncovers approximately 75% of the MOU TMRC and PEI had six monthsknown mining district. The area to draft and executebe studied also includesformal leasetwo-mile radius “area of interest.” The option agreement containing allprovides the standard termsCompany with the right to designate any properties within the “area of mining lease agreements. Upon execution of a lease, TMRC will be obligated to pay a $5,000 per month rental or a 12% royalty whichever is greater. Asinterest” as “project area” properties. The term of the dateoption is for so long as the Company continues to conduct exploration activities in the Project Area and can be exercised on 60 days’ notice to Santa Fe.

The Black Hawk district and the Alhambra mine, in particular, are historically known for the occurrence of this filing, no leasenative silver lenses, randomly distributed in narrow carbonate veins. The “ore shoots” are small, ranging from ten feet to seventy feet along the vertical axis and five to fifty along the horizontal axis. We believe that the excessive cost of locating and mining these small “ore shoots” has been executed.


Fundamentals of the Scandium Market

Scandium, like yttrium, is not technically a rare earth element but shares their exceptional chemical properties. The useful properties of scandium (Sc) are well known but its wide use has been retarded by lack of supply. Currently almost all is supplied principally by Russia and also by China. Russia’s supply is a by-product of uranium mining and China’s is from the Bataou Iron mine along with rare earth.

Scandium excels in two uses: solid oxide fuel cells and high strength aluminum alloy. Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC’s) can efficiently produce electricity using a mixture of zirconium oxide and scandium oxide as the solid electrolyte layer of the cell. This technology has been knownprincipal reason for a long time but its use has been restricted by their high operating temperatures. The use of scandium oxide lowers the operating temperature of these cells to an operationally practical level.


The other, and at the present time, far more important, use of scandium is an alloy of aluminum. This technology originated in Russia (USSR at that time), owing to their source of Sc, where it was discovered that these alloys have high-strength, stress resistance, temperature resistance and have superior welding characteristics. The USSR employed these alloys in a number of military applications including the MIG 29 (while U.S. aerospace designers understood the superiority of scandium for high-stress fighter aircraft, the inability to reliably source scandium led the U.S. to usesustain a heavier titanium alloy instead). Again, supply was the main drawback, even for the Soviets. Today, global productionmining operation in the opaque scandium market is estimated to run between 400 kg of virgin scandium, to a high end of 10 metric tons. In terms of potential demand, as one study notes:If only a tiny fraction (0.1%) of the annual aluminum market absorbed scandium in alloy at a 0.5% level, it would represent 350 tonnes ($700M) in global scandium demand.”this district.

In recent years, Airbus has extensively researched these Sc-Al alloys and has expressed high interest in using it in their airframes if a reliable supply can be developed. The American aircraft industry uses an inferior titanium-aluminum alloy. Besides its superiority as a structural alloy, the Sc-Al alloy is capable of making effective armor plate.

There is a growing interest in Sc for these reasons and there is a general consensus that as soon as a reliable supply can be found, the Sc-Al alloy usage will rapidly grow. The technology is ready, only the supply is lacking.

Scandium Pricing

Current scandium pricing is approximately $2000 per kilogram. The preliminary economic analysis (PEA) is based on this price. Although the projected expansion of usage of scandium is driven by availability rather than price, there is a possibility that at some time in the future the scandium price will seek lower levels. Because of the extremely favorable operating conditions athigh native silver content of ore historically mined in the Upper Lehigh propertydistrict, we estimate thathave considered the “break even” price for Scandiumuse of geophysics to locate these small lenses and pods, with the goal to make potential development and mining feasible. We are working with a geophysical service provider and consultants, and have completed four phases of electromagnetic surveying in the immediate area of the Alhambra mine. The method producing the most meaningful geological data is approximately $550 per kilogram.

The Departmenta method called NANOTEM by its developer, Zonge International. This technique was developed to locate small electrically conducting objects such as pipes, underground tanks and unexploded ordinance. Working with consultants and with Zonge International this technique was modified and applied to the immediate area of Energy Grant

In September of 2016 the Department of energy issuedAlhambra mine. Results are encouraging and plans have been made to conduct a Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) whereby they intendeddiamond drilling campaign to grant uptest the electrically conductive anomalies detected to $27.75 million for the siting of a pilot plant at a selected locationdate. This drilling is sited to test these “anomalies” within the Appalachian Coal fields. This grant wasgeologically favorable area along the vein immediately to the north of the Alhambra mine workings.

If the diamond drilling yields positive results, the anticipated next phase will be to enter the mine and extend the one hundred twelve foot level into the area drilled. Work to be in two stages,done upon re-entry of the first for $1 million to establish the basic engineering parametersmine will be determined by diamond drilling results and the second of up to $22.75 million to commission the pilot plant. TMRC took the lead and assembled a team consisting of itself, K-Tech, Penn State University and Inventure Renewables of Tuscaloosa. Inventure is closely associated with K-Tech and shares officers and directors. Inventure was chosen as the lead investigatorconditions encountered in the project becausemine.

Because the desired aim of its large, research oriented facilitythe geophysics and its considerable experience in securing and executing grantsdiamond drilling is to gain the confidence to re-enter the mine, very careful consideration has to be given to the permitting of this nature. In December of 2016project. The permitting plan being submitted goes beyond the consortium was awarded the phase 1 grantpermits required for a simple drilling program and funds were disbursed in September of 2017. TMRC‘s role in the venture will beseeks to anticipate such factors as a subcontractorshaft rehabilitation, water management, road access and is not the direct recipient of the grant funds. TMRC has begun the work of collecting the metallurgical samples and the first of these samples were delivered to Penn State in early October 2017.later, mine development.

31

 

Establishment of American Mineral Reclamation LLC

On June 22, 2017 we announced the establishment of American Mineral Reclamation LLC. This subsidiary has the mission to seek out and develop lower cost projects with shorter development times involving metals and mineral recovery and production from coal by-products, acid mine drainage waters and sludges, mine waste and tailings, industrial wastewater and recovery of strategic metals from scrap from various sources. In addition to REE and scandium we intend to include other important “tech” metals such as Lithium, Cobalt, Vanadium, Gallium and others as conditions dictate. We have executed a co-operation agreement to work jointly with Inventure Renewals. As of August 31, 2017, no activity has taken place within this LLC.


ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Pursuant to Section 1503(a) of the recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (The “Dodd-Frank Act”), issuers that are operators, or that have a subsidiary that is an operator, of a coal or other mine in the United States are required to disclose in their periodic reports filed with the SEC information regarding specified health and safety violations, orders and citations, related assessments and legal actions, and mining-related fatalities. During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2015,2023, our U.S. exploration properties were not subject to regulation by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) under theFederal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”).

32

 


PART II

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

ITEM 5.   MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIESMarket Information

Our common stockCommon Stock is listed for quotation on the OTCQX U.S.OTCQB operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. under the symbol “TMRC.” The market for our common stockCommon Stock on the OTCQX U.S.OTCQB is limited, sporadic and highly volatile. The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions. The following table sets forth the range of high and low bid prices during the periods indicated.

Fiscal Year 2023 High  Low 
Quarter ended August 31, 2023 $1.26  $0.79 
Quarter ended May 31, 2023 $1.32  $0.78 
Quarter ended February 28, 2023 $1.79  $1.20 
Quarter ended November 30, 2022 $2.13  $1.76 

 

Fiscal Year 2017 High  Low 
       
Quarter ended August 31, 2017 $0.24  $0.18 
Quarter ended May 31, 2017 $0.29  $0.15 
Quarter ended February 28, 2017 $0.19  $0.10 
Quarter ended November 30, 2016 $0.13  $0.10 

Fiscal Year 2016 High  Low 
       
Quarter ended August 31, 2016 $0.18  $0.12 
Quarter ended May 31, 2016 $0.18  $0.12 
Quarter ended February 28, 2016 $0.20  $0.12 
Quarter ended November 30, 2015 $0.25  $0.19 

Fiscal Year 2015 High  Low 
       
Quarter ended August 31, 2015 $0.33  $0.20 
Quarter ended May 31, 2015 $0.44  $0.19 
Quarter ended February 28, 2015 $0.24  $0.19 
Quarter ended November 30, 2014 $0.39  $0.22 
Fiscal Year 2022 High  Low 
Quarter ended August 31, 2022 $2.30  $1.70 
Quarter ended May 31, 2022 $2.21  $1.65 
Quarter ended February 28, 2022 $2.38  $1.62 
Quarter ended November 30, 2021 $2.49  $1.41 

 

The last bid price of our common stockCommon Stock on December 11, 2017November 17, 2023 was $0.15$0.3450 per share.

Holders

The approximate number of holders of record of our common stockCommon Stock as of December 11, 2017November 17, 2023 was 496.530.

Dividends

We have not paid any cash dividends on our equity securitysecurities and our Board has no present intention of declaring any cash dividends. We are not prohibited from paying any dividends pursuant to any agreement or contract.


Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

In September 2008, the BoardWe previously adopted our 2008 Stock Option Plan (the “2008 Plan”), which was alsoa stock option plan, approved by our shareholders in September 2008. In May 2011, the board of directors adopted an amendment to our 2008 Plan (the “Amended(“Amended 2008 Plan”), which was also approved by our shareholders in August 2011. The Amended 2008 Plan increased the number of shares available for grant from 2,000,000 to up to 5,000,000 shares of our common stock for awards to our officers, directors, employees and consultants. On February 15, 2012, our stockholders approved an increase of 2,000,000 of shares of common stock available for issuance under the amended 2008 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”). As amended, the Plan provides for 7,000,000 shares of common stock for all awards. On February 24, 2016, the stockholders of the Company approved an amendment to the Company’s 2008 Stock Option Plan, pursuant to which the number of shares available under the plan was increase from 7,000,000 to 9,000,000 shares of common stock. Other provisions of the Amended 2008 Plan remain the same as under our 2008 Plan. As of August 31, 2017, a total of 3,780,000 shares of our common stock remained available for future grants under the Amended 2008 Plan.


The following table sets forth certain information as of August 31, 20172023 concerning our common stockCommon Stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options or warrants or pursuant to purchases of stockissued under the Amended 2008 Plan:Plan and outside of such plan:

Plan Category 

(a) 

Number of 

Securities to be 

Issued Upon  

the Exercise   

of Outstanding  

Options  

  

(b) 

Weighted- 

Average 

Exercise Price of 

Outstanding 

Options  

  

(c) 

Available for 

Future 

Issuance Under 

Equity 

Compensation 

Plans 

(Excluding 

Securities 

Reflected in 

Column (a))  

 
Equity compensation plan approved by stockholders  330,000  $0.34    
Nonplan equity compensation  700,000  $1.02    
Total  1,030,000  $0.80    

 

 Plan Category 

(a)

Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon the Exercise of Outstanding
Options

  

(b)

Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options

  

(c)

Available for
Future
Issuance Under
Equity
Compensation
Plans
(Excluding
Securities
Reflected in
Column (a))

 
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders  5,220,000  $0.63   3,780,000 
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders  535,000  $0.31    
             
Total  5,755,000  $0.47   3,780,000 

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities During Fiscal 20172023

Except as set forth below, all unregistered sales of equity securities during the period covered by the Annual Report were previously disclosed in our current reports on Form 8-K or quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.

DateDescriptionNumberPurchaser

Proceeds 

($)

Consideration

Exemption 

(C)

June 2023Common Stock12,227(A)Directors$NilServicesSec. 4(a)(2)
June 2023Common Stock Options10,000(B)Consultant$NilServicesSec. 4(a)(2)
July 2022Common Stock Options10,000(B)Consultant$NilServicesSec. 4(a)(2)
August 2022Common Stock Options10,000(B)Consultant$NilServicesSec. 4(a)(2)

 

Date(A)DescriptionNumberPurchaserProceeds
($)
ConsiderationExemption
(B)
September 30, 2016Common Stock Purchase
Options
10,000(A)Consultant$NilAdvisory ServicesSec. 4(a)(2)
October 31, 2016Common Stock Purchase
Options
10,000(A)Consultant$NilAdvisory ServicesSec. 4(a)(2)
November 30, 2016Common Stock Purchase
Options
10,000(A)Consultant$NilAdvisory ServicesSec. 4(a)(2)
December 31, 2016Common Stock Purchase
Options
10,000(A)Consultant$NilAdvisory ServicesSec. 4(a)(2)
January 31, 2017Common Stock Purchase
Options
10,000(A)Consultant$NilAdvisory ServicesSec. 4(a)(2)
February 29, 2017Common Stock Purchase
Options
10,000(A)Consultant$NilAdvisory ServicesSec. 4(a)(2)
March 31, 2017Common Stock Purchase
Options
10,000(A)Consultant$NilAdvisory ServicesSec. 4(a)(2)
April 30, 2017Common Stock Purchase
Options
10,000(A)Consultant$NilAdvisory ServicesSec. 4(a)(2)
May 31, 2017Common Stock Purchase
Options
10,000(A)Consultant$NilAdvisory ServicesSec. 4(a)(2)
June 30, 2017Common Stock Purchase
Options
10,000(A)Consultant$NilAdvisory ServicesSec. 4(a)(2)
July 31, 2017Common Stock Purchase
Options
10,000(A)Consultant$NilAdvisory ServicesSec. 4(a)(2)
August 31, 2017Common Stock Purchase
Options
10,000(A)Consultant$NilAdvisory ServicesSec. 4(a)(2)


(A)Common Stock Purchase Options were issued pursuant to a consulting agreement. Options vested immediately. Each option is exercisabledirectors for a 5 year term at an exercise price of $0.30. The options were issued outside of the Company’s 2008 Stock Incentive Plan.services rendered.
  
(B)Non-plan Common Stock options issued pursuant to a consulting agreement for professional services.
(C)With respect to sales designated by “Sec. 4(a)(2),” these shares were issued pursuant to the exemption from registration contained in to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act as privately negotiated, isolated, non-recurring transactions not involving any public offer or solicitation. Each purchaser represented that such purchaser’s intention to acquire the shares for investment only and not with a view toward distribution. None of the securities were sold through an underwriter and accordingly, there were no underwriting discounts or commissions involved.

 

DateDescriptionNumberPurchaserProceeds
($)
ConsiderationExemption
(B)
September 2017Common Stock Warrants147,000(A)D&O$NilAdvancesSec. 4(a)(2)
November 2017Common Stock Warrants10,000(A)D&O$NilAdvancesSec. 4(a)(2)
December 2017Common Stock Warrants60,000(A)D&O$NilAdvancesSec. 4(a)(2)
January 2017Common Stock Warrants80,000(A)D&O$NilAdvancesSec. 4(a)(2)
March 2017Common Stock Warrants80,000(A)D&O$NilAdvancesSec. 4(a)(2)
April 2017Common Stock Warrants90,000(A)D&O$NilAdvancesSec. 4(a)(2)
May 2017Common Stock Warrants20,000(A)D&O$NilAdvancesSec. 4(a)(2)
July 2017Common Stock Warrants34,500(A)D&O$NilAdvancesSec. 4(a)(2)
August 2017Common Stock Warrants294,160(A)D&O$NilAdvancesSec. 4(a)(2)

(A)Common Stock Warrants were issued pursuant to advances made to the Company by certain Officers and Directors. Each warrant is exercisable for a 5 year term at an exercise price of $0.10 - $0.23

(B)With respect to sales designated by “Sec. 4(a)(2),” these shares were issued pursuant to the exemption from registration contained in to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act as privately negotiated, isolated, non-recurring transactions not involving any public offer or solicitation. Each purchaser represented that such purchaser’s intention to acquire the shares for investment only and not with a view toward distribution. None of the securities were sold through an underwriter and accordingly, there were no underwriting discounts or commissions involved.


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATARESERVED

Not applicable. 

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including, but not limited to, those set forth under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Overview

We are a mining company engaged in the business of the acquisition, exploration and if warranted, development of mineral properties. We currently holdown a 19.611% membership interest in Round Top, which entity holds two nineteen yearmineral property leases executed in September 2011 and November 2011,with the GLO to explore and develop a 950 acre950-acre rare earths project located in Hudspeth County, Texas, known as the Round Top ProjectProject. The leases expire in 2030 with provisions for automatic renewal if Round Top is producing in paying quantities (the receipt from the sale of materials exceeds all costs and expenses associated therewith for the prior 12 months). Round Top also holds prospecting permits covering an9,345 acres adjacent 9,345 acres. Our principal focus will be on developingto the Round Top Project. The business strategy of Round Top is to develop a metallurgical process to concentrate or otherwise extract the metals from the Round Top Project’s rhyolite, although weconduct additional engineering, design, geotechnical work, and permitting necessary for a bankable feasibility study and then to extract mineral resources from the Round Top Project. There can be no assurance that Round Top will continue to examine other opportunitiesbe successful in the region as they develop. We currently have limited operations and havethis endeavor. The Round Top Project has not established as of the date hereof that any of our projects orthe properties contain any Provenprobable mineral reserves or Probable Reservesproven mineral reserves under SEC Industry Guide 7. Our operationsItem 1300 of Regulation S-K nor can there be any assurance that this will occur.

Rare earth elements are exploratory in nature.

We currently do not have any producing properties and consequently, we have no current operating income or cash flow and have not generated any revenues. Further exploration will be required before a final evaluation as to the economic and practical feasibility of any of our properties is determined.

On December 23, 2013, we published a revised version of the June 2012 Preliminary Economic Assessment (the “Revised PEA”) on the Round Top Project based on a 20,000 tonne per day heap leach operation using a conventional element separation plant. The mineralized material estimate was recalculated to include uranium, niobium, tantalum and tin. The revised PEA assesses the potential economic viability of the simplified and “scaled down” operation which we believe is a much better fit with the present rare earth market.

On September 8, 2014, we announced that we had completed an internal analysis suggesting that there is a reasonable possibility to adapt a lower volume staged growth approach to development of our Round Top project. The analysis indicated that an operation designed to produce a selected group of separated REE productschemically similar elements that usually are found together in nature – they are referred to as the range“lanthanide series.” These individual elements have a variety of 350-450 tonnes per year range, could potentially yield favorable mine economics. The goal of the proposed staged approach would be to increase mining rates if and when our products gained acceptability. The analysis suggestedcharacteristics that capital needsare critical in the Revised PEA could be proportionally reduced in relation to the lower volume initial stage. We are currently conducting a more detailed analysis of the relative capital expenses and operating expenses requirements of a scaled down processing plant with both solvent extraction and ion exchange processes under evaluation. We believe the lower capital requirements of a staged startup could offset any marginal increase in unit operating costs.

Our current management and Board are stockholder-centric, and receive either no cash compensation or much less than previous management. We will require definitive scientific documentation, rigorous economic studies, consideration of a wide range of alternativestechnologies, products, and meticulous oversight of any cash outlays of stockholder funds.applications and are critical inputs in existing and emerging applications. Without these elements, multiple high-tech technologies would not be possible. These technologies include:


Current Plan of Operations

Continued Work Program on Round Top Project

See “Properties – Current and Planned Metallurgical Activities” for a description of our current work activities and budget for the Round Top Project.

Exploration Potential of the Round Top Property

Although we have no plans in the next 24 months to conduct more physical exploration, we do believe, as stated in our 2010 presentations, that there are untested exploration targets present. They are:

cell phones;

 

1.Uranium-beryllium mineralization at the lower contact of the rhyolitecomputer and the underlying sedimentary rock. This class of mineralization was the target of the successful exploration program conducted in the late 1980’s by Cabot Corporationtelevision screens;

battery operated vehicles;

clean energy technologies, such as hybrid and Cyprus Exploration. It appears to be structurally controlledelectric vehicles and associated with a later phase of hydrothermal or gas phase deposition that occurred sometime after the emplacement of the rhyolite. This fluorite-beryllium replacement mineralization in what is termed the West Side Fault under the north side of Round Top was the topic of a 1988 in-house feasibility study by Cyprus Minerals to historical standards (not NI 43-101 compliant under today’s Canadian regulations, not an SEC Industry Guide 7 compliant feasibility study) to produce beryllium. This zone is the location of the intact decline and lateral mine workings developed by Cyprus Minerals in 1988-89. Sampling and analysis by TMRC indicates the presence of uranium mineralization occurring adjacent to and likely associated with these beryllium bearing structures. This “Contact Zone” mineralization is not restricted to Round Top and is present under the Sierra Blanca rhyolite and there is some evidence in drill holes on Little Blanca that this style of mineralization may also be present there.wind power turbines;

 


2.Uranium-beryllium-rare earthfiber optics, lasers and other rare metals hostedhard disk drives;

numerous defense applications, such as structurally controlled fluorite replacementsguidance and control systems and global positioning systems; and

advanced water treatment technology for use in the limestones at depth below the known deposits. Geologic and geochemical conditions are thought to be conducive for the emplacement of replacement type deposits within the same fault zones that hosted the known beryllium-uranium deposits at depth where favorable host limestones are present. We believe that careful compilation and analysis of existing surface geologic mapping and of the drill data may better define these targets.industrial, military.

 

We believe that usingBecause of these applications, global demand for REE is projected to steadily increase due to continuing growth in existing applications and increased innovation and development of new end uses. Interest in developing resources domestically has become a strategic necessity as there is limited production of these elements outside of China. Our ability to raise additional funds to continue to fund our participation interest in the existing data we can improve our understanding of the exploration potential of the area without resorting to such expensive techniques such as drilling.

Actively Seeking Project Partners

In addition to pursuing the exploration of our Round Top Project we are actively seeking industry partnersmay be impacted by future prices for REEs.

Operations Update

USARE, the operating manager of the Round Top project, has advised TMRC that it continues to assistprogress the Round Top Project toward operations.  Over the last twelve months, Round Top achieved several major milestones including: (i) favorable breaker trials with the goal to increase mine throughput; (ii) favorable CIX separation trials for rare earth elements indicating that the CIX technology employed can extract commercial quality rare earths from the Round Top Project ore; and (iii) favorable membrane concentration trials.  The USARE Round Top team continues its work to determine an efficient means of managing alumina content, adding gallium to its output and is working with a major lithium company to maximize the value of the lithium content.  USARE has advised the Company that it (i) currently expects that (A) a PFS reflecting this work should be completed during calendar 2024 and (B) a small manufacturing unit should be established to begin processing Round Top Project ore in calendar 2025, and (ii) believes that Round Top remains an attractive venture and is in the process of updating the Round Top Project economic model.

History of the Round Top Project

In May 2021, we contributed our assets in the Round Top Project to Round Top in exchange for our original 20% membership interest in Round Top. Between June 2023 through the date of this Annual Report, we elected not to contribute an aggregate of $845,049 to fund our cash calls and our membership interest in Round Top was diluted from 20% to 19.611%, our current membership interest in Round Top.

As a part of our ongoing operations, we will occasionally investigate new mining opportunities. We may also incur expenses associated with our investigations. These costs are expensed as incurred until such time when we have agreements in place to purchase such mining rights.

Investment Company Act Exclusion

Section 3(c)(9) of the 1940 Act provides that a company “substantially all of whose business consists of owning or holding oil, gas, or other mineral royalties or leases, or fractional interests therein, or certificates of interest or participation in or investment contracts relative to such royalties, leases, or fractional interests” is not an investment company within the meaning of the 1940 Act. The Company has determined that this exemption applies to it giving consideration to the following four factors:

the exempted activity (ownership of our certificate of interest in the underlying mineral leases) constitutes “substantially all” of our business;

we own, and do not trade, in the certificate of interest in the mineral leases or the underlying mineral leases;

mineral leases qualify as an eligible asset for purposes of the exception; and

a membership interest in a limited liability company constitutes a “certificate of interest or participation in” or an “investment contract relative to” the eligible assets.

The Company intends to continue to conduct its business operations in order to continue to be excluded from the definition of an “investment company” under the 1940 Act.

Our financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.

Our financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has an accumulated deficit from inception through August 31, 2023, of approximately $42,344,000 and has yet to achieve profitable operations, and projects further losses in the development of its business. At August 31, 2023, the Company had a working capital surplus of approximately $1,025,000; however the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and pay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. 

35

In accordance with our current projected Budget, the Company does not have sufficient capital to fund its (i) total cash calls expected during the fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 (currently anticipated to be between $3 million to $4 million) and (ii) expected general and administrative expenses during the fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 (anticipated to be at least $600,000). The Company expects to incur dilution to its Round Top membership interest rather than to fund in cash its Round Top cash calls during the fiscal year ending August 31, 2024. If the Company were to determine to fund the Round Top cash calls in cash (rather than to incur dilution to its membership interest), the Company would be required to raise additional capital to fund its obligations (pursuant to the Budget and to fund general and administrative expenses) during the fiscal year ending August 31, 2024. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to raise the necessary capital to fund its cash calls and expected general and administrative expenses. We have no firm commitments for equity or debt financing and any financing that may be obtained will be on a best efforts basis. Based on these factors, there is substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of twelve months from the issuance date of these financial statements. The failure to obtain sufficient financing may cause us to curtail or discontinue operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At August 31, 2023, our accumulated deficit was approximately $42,344,000 and our cash position was approximately $1,079,000. We had a working capital surplus of approximately $1,025,000. Round Top has not commenced commercial production on the Round Top Project. We have no revenues from operations and anticipate we will have no operating revenues until we place one or more of our properties into production, of which there can be no assurance. All properties are in the exploration stage.

During the fiscal year ending August 31, 2023, we funded approximately $386,400 to Round Top pursuant to our funding obligations set forth in the Operating Agreement. In lieu of funding $448,800 of cash calls in June through August 2023, we incurred dilution in our membership interest from 20% to 19.874% at August 31, 2023.

During the current fiscal year, USARE has advised us that Round Top is expected to fund expenditures of approximately $15 million to $20 million to optimize the leaching and if warranted, developmentdeveloping of the CIX/CIC processing of the Round Top Project. While we do not currently have any agreements and do not anticipate any agreementsInitial process design work will be carried out at USARE’s facility in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. Pending completion of the near future, we are actively engaged in pursuing partners forinitial process development, this facility will either be relocated to or replicated at USARE’s Oklahoma facility where a pilot plant is expected to be established. It is estimated that the Round Top Project forwill require additional time and further expenditure to complete a rangebankable feasibility study. Our current expected funding obligation is projected to be between approximately $3 million to $4 million of participation, including but not limitedthe expected expenditures by Round Top during our current fiscal year, and we currently expect to joint-venture arrangements, project sale, significant investmentincur dilution to our Round Top membership interest in the Company, back-end processing and product sales arrangements and other financing arrangements to assist inlieu of funding the Round Top Project.

Operationcash calls in cash. It is possible that the Round Top Budget could increase in this current fiscal year and supportit should be expected that the Round Top Budget will be higher in future periods. The failure of us to raise capital to fund our cash call commitments in this current fiscal year and thereafter will result in dilution of our Round Top membership interest, which could be significant. See “Item 1, Business – USA Rare Earth Agreement” for a discussion of the DoE Grant.

Approximately 25% of TMRC’ efforts will be allocated to completing its sharecalculation of the Phase 1dilution mechanics.

We do not have sufficient cash on hand to fund our portion of the DoE grant. Our role in this grant is to acquire the samples, evaluate the primary and alternate sites, conduct the economic evaluation and co-ordinate the project.

Operation of American Minerals Reclamation

Absent the securing of feasibility financing for Round Top the remainder of TMRC plans to actively pursue the development of American Minerals Reclamation (AMR). We have set no geographical limitations on this project butBudget during our current fiscal year. Therefore, we are currently basing our efforts in the Pennsylvania coal producing region because of the excellent opportunities present there and existence of the network of people and institutions that have been developed during the grant application process.

Recent Corporate Developments

The following significant corporate developments occurred during the year ended August 31, 2017 and the subsequent period through the filing of this Annual Report:

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

We did not hold an annual meeting of stockholders for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2017 as required by the OTCQX.

On March 24, 2016, Ms. Laura Lynch resigned from the Board of Directors of Texas Mineral Resources Corp. for personal reasons. Ms. Lynch’s resignation was not the result of any disagreement with the Company regarding the Company’s operations, policies or practices.

Name Change

On March 21, 2016, we changed our name from “Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp.” to “Texas Mineral Resources Corp.”. In connection with the name change we filed a certificate of amendment to our certificate of incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. Management believes the name change reflects the broadening of the Company’s strategic focus on other minerals in addition to rare earth minerals, including lithium, potassium, magnesium, iron and aluminum sulfates.


Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of August 31, 2017, we had a working capital deficit of approximately $1,502,000. We currently have no working capital and will need to raise additional fundingcapital to implementfund our business strategy.


Duringportion of the current fiscal year ending August 31, 2017,Round Top Budget if we completed Stage 1ofelect not to dilute our metallurgical activitiesRound Top membership interest. If we elect to dilute our Round Top membership interest (through choice or as discusseda result of the failure to raise capital), such event will result in the section heading “ITEM 2. PROPERTIES”dilution to our Round Top membership interest. The most likely source of this Annual Report. Our budget for this stagefuture financing presently available to us is through the sale of activity was approximately $134,502. To dateour securities. Any sale of our shares of Common Stock will result in dilution of equity ownership to existing stockholders. This means that if we sell shares of Common Stock, more shares will be outstanding and each existing stockholder will own a smaller percentage of the shares then outstanding. Moreover, the actual or perceived sale of additional shares of our Common Stock to raise capital could further depress the price of our Common Stock which could adversely impact our ability to raise capital, result in more dilution to be incurred by existing stockholders, and possibly cause us to curtail or cease our operations. Alternatively, we may rely on debt financing and assume debt obligations that require us to make substantial interest and capital payments. Also, we may issue or grant warrants or options in the future pursuant to which additional shares of Common Stock may be issued. Exercise of such warrants or options will result in dilution of equity ownership to our existing stockholders. We have expended approximately that amount on Stage 1 which is now complete. Estimated cost of Stage 2 is $2,015,454, $336,454 of which has been spent; this phase, called milestone 1, of Stage 2 has been modifiedno firm commitment with respect to obtaining debt or equity financing and, augmented by the Defense Logistical Agency. Thereaccordingly, we will be reliant upon a best efforts financing strategy. Accordingly, there is no guaranteeassurance that we will be able to raise necessary capital, if any, to fund our portion of the working capital necessary for balance of Stage 2 activities. After completion of Stage 1, we will use any remaining available capital to begin work on Stage 2 ofRound Top Budget and our metallurgical activities.

The audit opinion and notes that accompany our financial statements forgeneral administrative expenses during the fiscal year endedending August 31, 2017, disclose a ’going concern’ qualification2024, the failure of which could ultimately cause us to curtail or cease our ability to continue in business. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern. We are an exploration stage company and we have incurred losses since our inception. We do not have sufficient cash to fund normal operations and meet debt obligations for the next 12 months without deferring payment on certain current liabilities and raising additional funds. We believe that the going concern condition cannot be removed with confidence until the Company has entered into a business climate where funding of its activities is more assured.operations.

We currently do not have funds to pursue exploration or development work on any of our properties, which means that we will be required to raise additional capital, enter into joint venture relationships, or find alternative means to finance our properties in order to place them into commercial production, if warranted, or evaluate the possibility of selling one or more of our projects or the Company in its entirety. Failure to obtain sufficient financing may result in the delay or indefinite postponement of exploration and, if warranted, development or production on one or more of our properties and any properties we may acquire in the future or even a loss of property interests. This includes our leases over claims covering the principal deposits on our properties, which may expire unless we expend minimum levels of expenditures over the terms of such leases. We cannot be certain that additional capital or other types of financing will be available if needed or that, if available, the terms of such financing will be favorable or acceptable to us. Our ability to arrange additional financing in the future will depend, in part, on the prevailing capital market conditions as well as our business performance.

Results of Operations

Fiscal Years ended August 31, 20172023 and 20162022

RevenueGrant Income

We had no operating revenues duringGrants received from government and other agencies in advance of a specific project’s expenses are deferred and recognized as other income in the fiscalstatements of operations in the period they are earned and the related project costs are incurred. For the years ended August 31, 20172023 and 2016.2022, we recognized $0 and $561,950, respectively, of grant income which is presented in other income net of grant related expenses totaling approximately $0 and $561,860, respectively.

36

Revenue

During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2023 and 2022, we had no revenues. For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2023, our net loss was approximately $2,592,000. We are not currently profitable. As a result of ongoing operating losses, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $34.6  million$42,344,000 as of August 31, 2017.2023. 

Operating expenses and resulting losses from Operationsoperations.

We incurred exploration costs for the fiscal years ended August 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, in the amount of approximately $90,000$782,000 and $216,000,$1,535,000, respectively. Expenditures during fiscal year 2017 and 20162023 were primarily for metallurgical testing. We recognized impairment relatedour obligation to mineral propertiesfund our portion of approximately $1,395,000the cash requirements set forth by our joint venture agreement with USARE and for project contractors for our New Mexico mining exploration. Currently most of the fiscal year ended August 31, 2017.expenditures associated with the USARE joint venture are funded by our joint venture partner, USARE.

Our general and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended August 31, 20172023 were approximately $496,000 . These$1,822,000 of which approximately $952,000 were stock compensation for services. The remaining expenditures were primarily for accrued payroll, and related taxes and benefits, professional fees and other general and administrative expenses necessary for our operations.

Our general and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended August 31, 20162022 were approximately $988,000. This amount included$1,376,000 of which approximately $189,000 in non-cash stock-based$503,000 were stock compensation to directors and compensation to outside consultants.for services. The remaining expenditures totaling approximately $799,000 were primarily for payroll, and related taxes and benefits, professional fees and other general and administrative expenses necessary for our operations.


We had losses from operations for the fiscal years ended August 31, 20172023 and 20162022 totaling approximately $1,981,000$2,604,000 and $1,204,000, respectively and net losses for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2017 and 2016 totaling approximately $2,135,000  and $1,214,000.$2,911,000, respectively. We had a gain on sale of asset of approximately $6,000net loss for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2016, interest2023 and other income2022 totaling approximately $450$2,592,000 and $2,904,000, respectively. We earned interest from our cash balances of approximately $34,000 and $7,000 for the year ended August 31, 2016, and accrued interest expense of approximately $154,000 and $16,000 for the fiscal years ended August 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, respectively.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

For the fiscal years ended August 31, 2017 and 2016, we have off-balance sheet arrangements for annual payments in relation to the mineral leases as disclosed in foot note 4 of the financial statements.None


Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

The Company does not expect the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on our results of operations, financial position, or cash flow.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Preparation of financial statements requires management to make assumptions, estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, costs and expenses, and the related disclosures of contingencies. Management bases its estimates on various assumptions and historical experience, which are believed to be reasonable; however, due to the inherent nature of estimates, actual results may differ significantly due to changed conditions or assumptions. On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and judgments to ensure that our financial statements are fairly presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material. Management believes that the following critical accounting estimates and judgments have a significant impact on our financial statements; Valuationstatements and valuation of options granted to Directorsdirectors and Officersofficers using the Black-Scholes model, and fair value of mineral properties.model. The accounting policies are described in greater detail in Note 2 to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2017.2023.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable.

 

Not applicable.

37

 


ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA


LBB & ASSOCIATES LTD., LLP

10260 Westheimer Road, Suite 310

Houston, TX 77042

Phone: (713) 800-4343 Fax: (713) 456-2408

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of

Texas Mineral Resources Corp.

Sierra Blanca, Texas

Opinion on the Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Texas Mineral Resources Corp., (the “Company”)Company) as of August 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years then ended. in the two-year period ended August 31, 2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of August 31, 2023 and 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended August 31, 2023, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company’s inability to meet funding requirements for its interest in Round Top Mountain Development, LLC would result in dilution of its ownership interest. The Company has not generated any revenues and the Company does not have resources sufficient to meet the projected funding requirements. This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters also are described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. OurAs part of our audits, include considerationwe are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion,Critical Audit Matters

Critical audit matters are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements referredthat were communicated or required to above present fairly, in allbe communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material respects, the financial position of Texas Mineral Resources Corp., as of August 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements the Company’s absence of significant revenues, recurring losses from operations, and its need for additional financing in order to fund its projected loss in 2017 raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The 2016 and 2017 financial statements do not include any adjustments(2) represented especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgements. We determined that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.there are no critical audit matters.

 

Open signature/s/ Ham, Langston & Brezina, L.L.P.

 

/S/ LBB & ASSOCIATES LTD., LLPWe have served as the Company’s auditor since 2020.

 

LBB & Associates Ltd., LLPHouston, Texas

November 29, 2023

298


TEXAS MINERAL RESOURCES CORP.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

August 31, 2023 and 2022

 

Houston, Texas

December 11, 2017


TEXAS MINERAL RESOURCES CORP.
BALANCE SHEETS

     
 August 31,
2017
 August 31,
2016
 
      2023  2022 
ASSETS                
                
CURRENT ASSETS                
Cash and cash equivalents $1,080  $5,164  $1,079,307  $1,838,300 
Short-term investments     505,611 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  6,667   6,667   39,577   293,130 
        
Total current assets  7,747   11,831   1,118,884   2,637,041 
                
Property and equipment, net  5,421   15,536      23,853 
Mineral properties  358,594   1,753,446 
Deposits  24,000   29,710 
Mineral properties, net  415,607   415,607 
Deposit     7,500 
                
TOTAL ASSETS $395,762  $1,810,523  $1,534,491  $3,084,001 
                
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY        
                
CURRENT LIABILITIES                
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $1,003,468  $602,533  $93,406  $41,101 
Advances due to related parties  246,165   76,500 
Current portion of note payable  260,387   260,387 
        
Total current liabilities  1,510,020   939,420   93,406   41,101 
Note payable - net of current portion and discount      
Total liabilities  1,510,020   939,420 
                
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES                
                
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Preferred stock, par value $0.001; 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding as of August 31, 2017 and August 31, 2016, respectively      
Common stock, par value $0.01; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 44,941,532 and 44,941,532 shares issued and outstanding as of August 31, 2017 and August 31, 2016, respectively  449,416   449,416 
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY        
Preferred stock, par value $0.001; 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding      
Common stock, par value $0.01; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 73,728,263 and 72,869,220 shares issued and outstanding as of August 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively  737,283   728,692 
Additional paid-in capital  33,068,309   32,918,544   43,047,824   42,066,269 
Accumulated deficit  (34,631,983)  (32,496,857)  (42,344,022)  (39,752,061)
Total shareholders’ equity  (1,114,258)  871,103 
                
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY $395,762  $1,810,523 
Total shareholders' equity  1,441,085   3,042,900 
        
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY $1,534,491  $3,084,001 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


TEXAS MINERAL RESOURCES CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Years Ended August 31, 2023 and 2022

 


TEXAS MINERAL RESOURCES CORP.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

  Year Ended
August 31,
 
  2017  2016 
       
OPERATING EXPENSES        
Exploration costs $90,484  $216,223 
Impairment of mineral properties  1,394,852    
General and administrative expenses  495,906   987,869 
         
Total operating expenses  1,981,242   1,204,092 
         
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS  (1,981,242)  (1,204,092)
         
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)        
Gain on sale of asset     5,698 
Interest and other income  2   448 
Interest and other expense  (153,886)  (15,993)
Total other income (expense)  (153,884)  (9,847)
         
NET LOSS $(2,135,126) $(1,213,939)
         
Net loss per share:        
Basic and diluted net loss per share $(0.05) $(0.03)
         
Weighted average shares outstanding:        
Basic and diluted  44,941,532   43,857,977 
  2023  2022 
OPERATING EXPENSES        
Exploration costs $781,547  $1,534,915 
General and administrative  1,821,984   1,376,274 
         
Total operating expenses  2,603,531   2,911,189 
         
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS  (2,603,531)  (2,911,189)
         
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET        
Gain on sale of assets  (22,689)   
Grant income, net of related expenses     93 
Interest and other income  34,259   7,357 
         
Total other income, net  11,570   7,450 
         
NET LOSS $(2,591,961) $(2,903,739)
         
Net loss per common share        
Basic and diluted $(0.04) $(0.04)
         
Weighted average shares outstanding        
Basic and diluted  73,199,501   72,403,029 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


TEXAS MINERAL RESOURCES CORP.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

TEXAS MINERAL RESOURCES CORP.

 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Years Ended August 31, 2023 and 2022

 

  Year Ended
August 31,
 
  2017  2016 
       
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES        
Net loss $(2,135,126) $(1,213,939)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Cashless compensation for advances  105,751    
Discount on loans from beneficial conversion feature  25,107    
Impairment of mineral properties  1,394,852    
Depreciation expense  10,115   27,737 
Gain on sale of asset     (5,697)
Stock based compensation  18,907   188,756 
Changes in current assets and liabilities:        
Deposits  5,710   20,753 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  400,935   135,075 
Accounts payable related party    239,224 
Net cash used in operating activities  (173,749)  (608,091)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES        
Proceeds from sale of equipment     9,776 
Investment in mineral properties     (15,000)
Net cash used in investing activities     (5,224)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES        
Payment on lease note payable     (30,459)
Cash from sale of common stock     569,500 
Proceeds from loan payable  169,665   76,500 
Net cash provided by financing activities  169,665   615,541 
         
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  (4,084)  2,226 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD  5,164   2,938 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD $1,080  $5,164 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION        
Interest paid $  $ 
Taxes paid $  $ 
  2023  2022 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES        
Net loss $(2,591,961) $(2,903,739)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization expense  1,164   6,981 
Loss on disposal of property and equipment  22,689    
Stock based compensation  952,146   503,442 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Prepaid expenses and other assets  253,553   (220,101)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  52,305   (150,293)
Accounts payable – related parties     (10,000)
         
Net cash used in operating activities  (1,310,104)  (2,773,710)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES        
Return of deposits  7,500   5,120 
Purchases of short-term investments     (505,611)
Purchases of mineral properties     (233,852)
Proceeds from maturity of short-term investments  505,611    
         
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  513,111   (734,343)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES        
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options and warrants  38,000   239,700 
         
Net cash provided by financing activities  38,000   239,700 
         
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  (758,993)  (3,268,353)
         
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD  1,838,300   5,106,653 
         
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD $1,079,307  $1,838,300 
         
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION:        
         
Cash paid for interest expense $  $ 
         
Cash paid for income taxes $  $ 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


TEXAS MINERAL RESOURCES CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

For the Years Ended August 31, 2023 and 2022

 


TEXAS MINERAL RESOURCES CORP.
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
 For the Year Ended August 31, 2017 and 2016

  Preferred Stock  Common Stock  Additional  Paid-in  Accumulated    
   Shares   Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Total 
                             
Balance at August 31, 2015    $   41,368,015  $413,681  $32,106,023  $(31,282,918) $1,236,786 
                             
Options issued to Officers and Directors                  106,785       106,785 
                             
Options issued for services                  19,471       19,471 
                             
Common stock issued for services          276,017   2,760   59,740       62,500 
                             
Common stock issued for cash          2,847,500   28,475   541,025       569,500 
                             
Common stock issued for note conversion          450,000   4,500   85,500       90,000 
                             
Net loss                      (1,213,939)  (1,213,939)
                             
Balance at August 31, 2016        44,941,532   449,416   32,918,544   (32,496,857)  871,103 
                             
Options issued for services                  18,907       18,907 
                             
Cashless compensation for advances                  105,751       105,751 
                             
Discount on notes payable from beneficial conversion                  25,107       25,107 
                             
Net loss                      (2,135,126)  (2,135,126)
                             
Balance at August 31, 2017    $   44,941,532  $449,416  $33,068,309  $(34,631,983) $(1,114,258)
                          
  Preferred Stock  Common Stock  Additional
Paid-in
  Accumulated    
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Total 
Balance at August 31, 2021    $   71,934,065  $719,341  $41,332,478  $(36,848,322) $5,203,497 
                             
Stock based compensation        131,825   1,318   176,689      178,007 
Common stock options and warrants Issued for services              325,435      325,435 
Common stock issued upon exercise of options and warrants        726,000   7,260   232,440      239,700 
Common stock issued upon cashless exercise of options and warrants        77,330   773   (773)      
Net loss                 (2,903,739)  (2,903,739)
                             
Balance at August 31, 2022        72,869,220   728,692   42,066,269   (39,752,061)  3,042,900 
                             
Stock based compensation        136,544   1,366   166,304      167,670 
Common stock issued for prior services rendered        612,498   6,125   (6,125)      
Common stock options issued for services              784,476      784,476 
Common stock issued upon exercise of options and warrants        110,000   1,100   36,900      38,000 
Net loss                 (2,591,961)  (2,591,961)
                             
Balance at August 31, 2023    $   73,728,262  $737,283  $43,047,824  $(42,344,022) $1,441,085 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


TEXAS MINERAL RESOURCES CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AUGUST 31, 20172023 AND 20162022

 

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS

 

Texas Rare EarthMineral Resources CorpCorp. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada in 1970.1970 as Standard Silver Corporation. In July 2004, our articles of incorporation were amended and restated to increase2010, the authorized capital to 25,000,000 common shares and, in April 2007, we effected a 1 for 2 reverse stock split. In September 2008, our articles of incorporation were further amended and restated to increase the authorized capital to 100,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.01 per share and to authorize 10,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $0.001 per share. Our fiscal year-end is August 31.

Effective September 1, 2010, weCompany changed ourits name from “Standard Silver Corporation” to “Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp”. In 2012, the Company changed its state of incorporation from Nevada to Delaware under a plan of conversion dated August 24, 2012. In 2016, the Company changed its name to Texas Mineral Resources Corp.

We are now a mining company engaged in the business of the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties. As ofAt August 31, 2023, we owned a 19.874% membership interest in Round Top Mountain Development, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Round Top” or “RTMD”), which entity holds two mineral property leases with the date of this filing, we hold two nineteen year leases, executed in September and November of 2011,GLO to explore and develop a 950 acre-acre rare earths project located in Hudspeth County, Texas, known as the Round Top Project andProject. The leases expire in 2030. Round Top also holds prospecting permits covering an9,345 acres adjacent 9,345 acres. We also own unpatented mining claims in New Mexico. We are currently not evaluating any additional prospects, and intend to focus primarily on the development of our Round Top rare earth prospect.

On August 24, 2012, we changed our stateProject. The business strategy of incorporationRound Top is to develop a metallurgical process to concentrate or otherwise extract the metals from the State of NevadaRound Top Project’s rhyolite, conduct additional engineering, design, geotechnical work, and permitting necessary for a bankable feasibility study and then to extract mineral resources from the State of Delaware (the “Reincorporation”) pursuant to a plan of conversion dated August 24, 2012.Round Top Project. The Reincorporation was previously submitted to a vote of, and approved by, our stockholders at a special meetingRound Top Project has not established as of the stockholders held on April 25, 2012.

On March 14, 2016, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment with the Secretary of Statedate hereof that any of the Stateproperties contain any probable mineral reserves or proven mineral reserves under Item 1300 of Delaware to amend its Certificate of Incorporation to change the name of the Company from “Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp” to “Texas Mineral Resources Corp”Regulation S-K (“Item 1300”). The amendment was effective on March 21, 2016. The Certificate of Amendment did not make any other amendments to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation.

The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which assumes the Company will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. The Company has incurred losses since inception resulting in an accumulated deficit of approximately $34.6  million as of August 31, 2017 and further losses are anticipated in the development of its business raising substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company generating profitable operations in the future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management intends to finance operating costs over the next twelve months with existing cash on hand and loans from directors and or private placement of common stock.

 

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Exploration-Stage Company

Since January 1, 2009, the Company has been classified as an “exploration stage” company for purposes of Item 1300 of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Under Item 1300, companies engaged in significant mining operations are classified into three categories, referred to as “stages” - exploration, development, and production. Exploration stage includes all companies that do not have established reserves in accordance with Item 1300. Such companies are deemed to be “in the search for mineral deposits.” Notwithstanding the nature and extent of development-type or production-type activities that have been undertaken or completed, a company cannot be classified as a development or production stage company unless it has established reserves in accordance with Item 1300.

Basis of Presentation

 

OurThe Company’s financial records are maintained on the accrual basis of accounting whereby revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are recorded when incurred, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted accounting principlesin the United States of America (“US GAAP”) – United States..

 

ReclassificationPrinciples of prior yearConsolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Texas Mineral Resources Corp and its proportionate interest in the assets, liabilities, and operations of Round Top. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Going Concern

These financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has an accumulated deficit from inception through August 31, 2023, of approximately $42,344,000 and has yet to achieve profitable operations, and projects further losses in the development of its business.

At August 31, 2023, the Company had a working capital surplus of approximately $1,025,000, however the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate profitable operations in the future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. These financial statements do not include any adjustments to the amounts and classifications of assets and liabilities that may be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

 


OurNOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

In accordance with our current projected budget, the Company does not have sufficient capital to fund its total cash calls and expected general and administrative expenses during the fiscal year ending August 31, 2024. Failure by the Company to make required cash calls to Round Top during the 12 months from the issuance date of these financial statements would result in dilution to its membership interest in Round Top, which is 19.874% at August 31, 2023. Accordingly, the Company may be required to raise additional capital to fund its obligations during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2016 contain amounts2024. There can be no assurance that have been reclassifiedthe Company will be able to raise the necessary capital to fund its cash calls and expected general and administrative expenses. The Company may also seek to obtain short-term loans from the directors of the Company. Based on these factors, there is substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for presentation purposes. The amounts and contenta period of account balances were not altered duringtwelve months from the reclassification.issuance date of these financial statements.  

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

We considerThe Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents currently consist only of demand deposits at commercial banks. We currently doThe Company maintains cash and cash equivalents at banks selected by management based upon their assessment of the financial stability of the institution. Balances periodically exceed the federal depository insurance limit; however, the Company has not have cashexperienced any losses on deposits.

Short-term investments

Short-term investments consists of certificates of deposit and similar time-based deposits atwith financial institutions in excesswith original maturity dates over three months and up to twelve months. The carrying value approximates fair value due to the short duration of federally insured limits.the instrument.

Property and Equipment

 

Property and Equipment

Our property and equipment consistsconsist primarily of vehicles, furniture and equipment, and are recorded at cost. Expenditures related to acquiring or extending the useful life of our property and equipment are capitalized. Expenditures for repair and maintenance are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of 3-203-20 years.

 

Lease Deposits

 

From time to time, the Company makes deposits in anticipation of executing leases. The deposits are capitalized upon execution of the applicable agreements. 

 


NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)Long-lived Assets

 

Long-lived Assets

The Company reviews the recoverability of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable through operations. To determine if these costs are in excess of their recoverable amount, periodic evaluation of carrying value of capitalized costs and any related property and equipment costs are based upon expected future cash flows and/or estimated salvage value in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC 360”),Property, Plant and Equipment.The Company’s assets susceptible to impairment analysis are the mineral properties described in foot note 4.Note 5.

 

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been performed, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is probable. We have yet to generate any revenue.

Mineral Exploration and Development Costs

 

All exploration expenditures are expensed as incurred. Costs of acquisition and option costs of mineral rights are capitalized upon acquisition. Costs incurred to maintain current production or to maintain assets on a standby basis are charged to operations. If the Company does not continue with exploration after the completion of the feasibility study, the mineral rights will be expensed at that time. Costs of abandoned projects are charged to mining costs including related property and equipment costs. To determine if these costs are in excess of their recoverable amount, periodic evaluation of carrying value of capitalized costs and any related property and equipment costs are based upon expected future cash flows and/or estimated salvage value in accordance with ASC 360-10-35-15,Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Exploration costs were approximately $90,000 and $216,000 for the years ended August 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.


NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

 

Share-based Payments

 

The Company estimates the fair value of share-based compensation on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model, in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718,Stock Compensation and ASC 505, Share-Based Payments. Key inputs and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options include the grantexercise price of the award, the expected option term, market price of the underlying common stock, volatility of ourthe common stock, the risk-free rate, and dividend yield. Estimates of fair value are not intended to predict actual future events or the value ultimately realized by the option holders, and subsequent events are not indicative of the reasonableness of the original estimates of fair value made by the Company.value.

 

Amended 2008 Stock Option PlanIncome Taxes

 

In September 2008, the Board adopted our 2008 Stock Option Plan (the “2008 Plan”), which was also approved by our shareholders in September 2008. In May 2011, the board of directors adopted an amendment to our 2008 Plan (the “Amended 2008 Plan”), which was also approved by our shareholders in August 2011. The Amended 2008 Plan increased the number of shares available for grant from 2,000,000 to up to 5,000,000 shares of our common stock for awards to our officers, directors, employees and consultants. On February 15, 2012, our stockholders approved an increase of 2,000,000 of shares of common stock available for issuance under the amended 2008 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”). As amended, the Plan provides for 7,000,000 shares of common stock for all awards. On February 24, 2016, the stockholders of the Company approved an amendment to the Company’s 2008 Stock Option Plan, pursuant to which the number of shares available under the plan was increase from 7,000,000 to 9,000,000 shares of common stock. Other provisions of the Amended 2008 Plan remain the same as under our 2008 Plan. As of August 31, 2017, a total of 3,780,000 shares of our common stock remained available for future grants under the Amended 2008 Plan.


Income Taxes

Income taxes are computed using the asset and liability method, in accordance with ASC 740,Income Taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax basesbasis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the currently enacted tax rates and laws. A valuation allowance is provided for the amount of deferred tax assets that, based on available evidence, are not expected to be realized.

 

The Company recognizes and measures a tax benefit from uncertain tax positions when it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The Company recognizes a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company adjusts these liabilities when its judgement changes as a result of the evaluation of new information not previously available. Due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from the current estimate or future recognition of an unrecognized tax benefit. These differences will be reflected as increases or decreases to income tax expense in the period in which they are determined. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax positions within the income tax expense line in the statements of operations. Management believes the Company has no uncertain tax positions at August 31, 2023 and 2022.

Basic and Diluted LossIncome (Loss) Per Share

 

The Company computes lossincome (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260,Earnings Per Share, which requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share on the face of the Statements of Operations. Basic lossincome (loss) per share is computed by dividing net lossincome (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of outstanding common shares during the period. Diluted lossincome (loss) per share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period, including stock options and warrants using the treasury method. Dilutive lossincome (loss) per share excludes all potential common shares if their effect is anti-dilutive.


NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

 

At August 31, 2023, options to purchase 1,030,000 shares of common stock were outstanding but not included in the computation of dilutive earnings per share because these options were antidilutive.

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of AmericaU.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Management believes that these financial statements include all normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.


NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

 

Fair Value Measurements

 

We accountThe Company accounts for assets and liabilities measured at fair value in accordance with ASC 820,Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.ASC 820 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified with Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

 

 Level 1: Observable inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets.

 Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

 Level 3: Inputs that are generally unobservable. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.

 

OurThe Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash, short-term investments and accounts payable and accrued liabilities and note payable.liabilities. The carrying amounts of such financial instruments in the accompanying financial statements approximate their fair values due to their relatively short-term nature. It is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to any significant currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.

 

Recent Accounting PronouncementsNOTE 3 – JOINT VENTURE ARRANGEMENTS

 

Pronouncements betweenIn August 31, 2017 and the date of this filing are not expected to have a significant impact on our operations, financial position, or cash flow, nor does2018, the Company expect the adoption of recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.


Joint Venture

On July 15, 2015, weand Morzev Pty. Ltd. (“Morzev”) entered into an operatingagreement (the “2018 Option Agreement”) whereby Morzev was granted the exclusive right to earn and acquire a 70% interest in the Round Top Project by financing $10 million of expenditures in connection with the Round Top Project, increasable to an 80% interest, for an additional $3 million payment to the Company. Morzev began engaging in business as USA Rare Earth and in May 2019 notified the Company that it was nominating USA Rare Earth, LLC (“USARE”) as the optionee under the terms of the 2018 Option Agreement. In August 2019, the Company and USARE entered into an amended and restated option agreement as further amended on June 29, 2020 (the “2019 Option Agreement” and collectively with the 2018 Option Agreement, the “Option Agreement”), whereby the Company restated its agreement to grant USARE the exclusive right to earn and acquire a 70% interest, increasable to an 80% interest, in the Round Top Project.

In May 2021, and in accordance with the terms of the Option Agreement, the Company and USARE entered into a contribution agreement (“Contribution Agreement”) whereby the Company and USARE contributed assets to Round Top, at the time a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, in exchange for their initial ownership interests in Round Top, of which the Company initially owned a membership interest equating to 20% of Round Top and USARE initially owned a membership interest equating to 80% of Round Top. Concurrently therewith, the Company and USARE as the two members entered into a limited liability company agreement (“Operating Agreement”) with K-Tech,governing the operations of Round Top which contains customary and industry standard terms as contemplated by the Option Agreement. USARE serves as manager of Round Top.

Upon entry into the Contribution Agreement, the Company assigned the following contracts and assets to formalize our joint venture company, Reetech, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Reetech”),Round Top in exchange for its initial 20% membership interest in Round Top:


NOTE 3 – JOINT VENTURE ARRANGEMENTS (CONTINUED)

the assignment and assumption agreement with respect to the mineral leases from the Company to Round Top;

the assignment and assumption agreement with respect to the surface lease from the Company to Round Top;

the assignment and assumption agreement with respect to the surface purchase option from the Company to Round Top;

the assignment and assumption agreement with respect to the water lease from the Company to Round Top; and

the bill of sale and assignment agreement of existing data and other relevant contracts and permits with respect to Round Top owned by the Company.

and USARE assigned the purposes of developing, refiningfollowing assets to Round Top (or the Company, as applicable) for its initial 80% membership interest in Round Top:

cash to Round Top to continue to fund Round Top operations in the amount of approximately $3,761,750 comprising the balance of the $10 million required expenditure to earn a 70% interest in Round Top;

cash in the amount of $3 million to the Company upon exercise of the USARE option to acquire from the Company an additional 10% interest in Round Top, resulting in the aggregate ownership interest of 80% in Round Top;

bill of sale and assignment agreement of the Pilot Plant and other relevant contracts and permits to Round Top; and

bill of sale and assignment agreement of existing data and intellectual property owned by USARE to Round Top.

On June 26, 2023, the Company, USARE and marketing K-Tech’s CIX/CIC process pursuant to the February 24, 2015 letter of intent with K-Tech. Pursuantmanager amended and restated the Operating Agreement and the following material amendments to the Operating Agreement K-Tech holdswere adopted:

Cash Calls

On the basis of the adopted program and budget then in effect, the manager will submit to each member monthly cash calls at least 10 days before the last day of each month, and within 10 days of receipt, (a) USARE will pay to RTMD, as an initialadditional capital contribution, its proportionate share of the estimated cash requirements based on its interest and (b) the Company will either (i) pay to RTMD, as an additional capital contribution, its proportionate share of 97.21%the estimated cash requirements based on its interest, or (ii) deliver to RTMD a written notice indicating what amount, if any, of Reetechthe applicable estimated cash requirements that the Company will contribute (the “Notice of Non-Contribution”). Failure by the Company to deliver payment of its proportionate share of the estimated cash requirements, as an additional capital contribution, or to deliver a Notice of Non-Contribution within the 10 day period shall automatically be considered a “Deemed Non-Contribution” and shall have the same effect as if the Company provided a timely Notice of Non-Contribution with respect to non-contribution of its entire proportionate share of the applicable cash call.

Remedies for Failure to Meet Cash Calls

Non-Contribution. Capital contributions only will be made to fund programs and budgets. If the Company does not contribute all or any portion of any additional capital contribution that it is required to contribute pursuant to a Notice of Non-Contribution or a Deemed Non-Contribution (such unfunded amount shall be deemed the “Shortfall Amount”), then USARE shall fund the entire Shortfall Amount within 5 business days after the Notice of Non-Contribution or Deemed Non-Contribution.


NOTE 3 – JOINT VENTURE ARRANGEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Dilution. Upon the contribution of the Shortfall Amount by USARE, the interests of the members will be recalculated based on the adjustment provision set forth below in the sub-heading “– Adjustment of Interests”.

Maximum Dilution. The dilution of the Company shall not fall below a 3% interest in RTMD (the “Minimum Percentage Interest”). Upon the contribution by USARE of a Shortfall Amount which otherwise would result in a dilution of the Company below the Minimum Percentage Interest, USARE will receive a priority distribution of available cash, in addition to a distribution of available cash to which USARE otherwise is entitled to receive as a result of its technologyproportionate additional capital contribution pursuant to a licensethe applicable cash call request, up to Reetechthe Shortfall Amount that would have resulted in the Company’s interest being further diluted but for the Minimum Percentage Interest (the “Reetech License) and TMRC holds an initial interest of 2.79% pursuant to“Priority Distribution”). The Priority Distribution will continue until USARE has been reimbursed for its contribution of the Shortfall Amount that would have resulted in the Company having an interest below the Minimum Percentage Interest, after which time the members shall receive distributions of available cash paymentpro rata in proportion to their respective interests.

Adjustment of $391,000Interests. If USARE contributes the Shortfall Amount, then the then current interest of the Company will be reduced (subject to the prior developmentMinimum Percentage Interest), effective as of each cash call under an additional capital contribution for the applicable program and budget, by a fraction, expressed as a percentage:

the numerator of which equals the Shortfall Amount actually funded by USARE; and

the denominator of which equals the market capitalization of the Company.

Distributions

Cash in excess of authorized reserves will be distributed to the members pro-rata in proportion to their respective interests on a periodic basis as determined by the management committee. RTMD will be required to make tax distributions to each member. Once USARE has been paid the Priority Distribution, if applicable, all distributions made in connection with the sale or exchange of all or substantially all of RTMD’s assets and all distributions made in connection with the liquidation of RTMD will be made to the members pro-rata in accordance with their respective interests.

Other material terms of the contributed Technology forOperating Agreement that remain unchanged are as follows:

Management

A management committee will make the purposesmajor decisions of RTMD, such as approval of the joint venture. TMRC hasrespective program and budget, and the ability to earn a 49.9% interest in Reetech by contributing up to $7.0 million in cash contributions upon the satisfaction of certain development milestones. Reetech is governed by a board of managers comprisedmanager will implement such decisions. The management committee consists of three managers:representatives of the members, with two being appointed by USARE and one manager appointed by the Company which is Dan Gorski. The representatives vote the ownership percentage interests of their appointing member.

Management Committee Meetings

Meetings will be held every three months unless otherwise agreed. For matters before the management committee that require a vote, oting is by simple majority except for certain “major decisions” that require a unanimous vote. So long as the Company maintains a 15% or greater ownership interest, the nine decisions identified in the bullet points below require unanimous approval. If the Company’s ownership interest falls below 15%, the number of unanimous decisions is reduced to five (being the first five bullet points below). If the Company is acquired by a REE mining company or sells its ownership interest to a REE mining company, in each case who elects a majority of the Company’s board, this unanimous approval requirement can be suspended by USARE, at its option. The major decisions requiring unanimous approval, as set forth above, are:


NOTE 3 – JOINT VENTURE ARRANGEMENTS (CONTINUED)

approval of an amendment to any program and budget that causes the program and budget to increase by 15% or more, except for emergencies;

other than purchase money security interests or other security interests in RTMD equipment to finance the acquisition or lease of RTMD equipment used in operations, the consummation of a project financing or the incurrence by RTMD of any indebtedness for borrowed money that requires the guarantee by any member of any obligations of RTMD;

substitution of a member under certain circumstances and dissolution of RTMD;

the issuance of an ownership interest or other equity interest in RTMD, or the admission of any person as a new member of RTMD, other than in connection with the exercise of a right of first offer by a member;

the redemption of all or any portion of an ownership interest, except for limited circumstances provided for in the Operating Agreement;

a decision to grant authorization for RTMD to file a petition for relief under any chapter of the United States Bankruptcy Code, to consent to such relief in any involuntary petition filed against RTMD by any third party, or to admit in writing any insolvency of RTMD or inability to pay its debts as they become due, or to consent to any receivership of RTMD;

acquisition or disposition of significant mineral rights, other real property or water rights outside of the area of interest as set forth in the Operating Agreement or outside of the ordinary course of business;

the merger of RTMD into or with any other entity; and

the sale of all or substantially all of RTMD’s assets.

Manager

The manager will manage, direct and two managers appointed by K-Tech.control operations in accordance with program and budget, will prepare and present to the management committee a proposed program and budget, and will generally oversee and implement all of the day to day activities of RTMD. The manager will conduct necessary equipment and materials procurement and property and equipment maintenance activities, with all operations to be conducted in accordance with adopted program and budget.

 

The Company uses the cost method to accountaccounts for its investmentinterest in Round Top using the proportionate consolidation method, which is an exception available to entities in the joint venture. Under the cost method, the Company recognizesextractive industries, thereby recognizing its pro-rate share of the earningsassets, liabilities, and lossesoperations of the joint venture as they accrue instead of when they are realized. We have elected to expense the initial investment amount of $391,000 as exploration expenses. Based upon information available we have determined there are no significant potential loss liabilities. The Company’s interestRound Top in the joint venture remains $0. appropriate classifications in the financial statements.


NOTE 34PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET

 

Property and equipment consist of office furniture, equipment and vehicles. The propertyProperty and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful life of 3-203-20 years. OurFollowing is an analysis of property and equipment net consistat August 31, 2023 and 2022:

Schedule of the following:property and equipment

  2023  2022 
Furniture and office equipment $  $75,606 
Vehicles     124,092 
Computers and software     48,711 
Field equipment     71,396 
         
Total cost basis     319,805 
Less: accumulated depreciation     (295,951)
         
Property and equipment, net $  $23,853 

 

  August 31,
2017
  August 31,
2016
 
Furniture & office equipment $75,606  $75,606 
Vehicles  89,185   89,185 
Computers & software  48,711   48,711 
Field equipment  71,396   71,396 
Total cost basis  284,898   284,898 
Less: Accumulated depreciation  (279,477)  (269,362)
Property & equipment, net $5,421  $15,536 

NOTE 4 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET (CONTINUED)

 

Depreciation expense for the years ending August 31, 20172023 and 20162022 was $10,115$1,164 and $27,737, respectively and is included in general and administrative expenses.$6,981, respectively.

 

NOTE 45MINERAL PROPERTIES

 

SeptemberAs further discussed in Note 3, Joint Venture Arrangements, in May 2021, the Company assigned all rights and obligations related to the Round Top Project to Round Top in exchange for a 20% interest. The following discussion of the “August 2010 Lease”, “November 2011 Lease”, “March 2013 Lease”, and “October 2014 Surface Option and Water Lease” pertain to the Round Top Project and were assigned to Round Top in May 2021.

August 2010 Lease

 

On September 2, 2011, we entered intoAugust 17, 2010, the Company executed a new mining lease with the Texas General Land Office covering Sections 7 and 18 of Township 7, Block 71 and Section 12 of Block 72, covering approximately 860 acres at Round Top Mountain in Hudspeth County, Texas. The mining lease issued by the Texas General Land Office gives usprovides for the right to explore, produce, develop, mine, extract, mill, remove, and market beryllium, uranium, rare earth elements, all other base and precious metals, industrial minerals and construction materials and all other minerals excluding oil, gas, coal, lignite, sulfur, salt, and potash. The term of the lease is nineteen years so long as minerals are produced in paying quantities.

 

Under the terms of the lease, we willRound Top is obligated to pay the State of Texas a total lease bonus of $142,518; $44,718 of which was$142,518. The Company paid $44,718 upon the execution of the lease, and $97,800 whichRound Top will be due when we submitrequired to pay the remaining $97,800 upon submission of a supplemental plan of operations to conduct mining. Upon the sale of any minerals removed from the Round Top weProject, Round Top will pay the State of Texas a $500,000$500,000 minimum advance royalty.

Thereafter, weif paying quantities of minerals are obtained, Round Top will be required to pay the State of Texas a production royalty equal to eight percent (8%) of the market value of uranium and other fissionable materials removed and sold from the Round Top Project and six and one quarter percent (61/4%) of the market value of all other minerals removed and sold from Round Top.

Thereafter, assuming production ofsold. If paying quantities hashave not been obtained, weRound Top may pay additional delay rental fees to extend the term of the lease for successive one (1)(1) year periods pursuant to the following schedule:

Schedule of August 2010 Lease

 Per Acre
Amount
 Total
Amount
  Per Acre
Amount
  Total
Amount
 
September 2, 2015 – 2019  $75  $67,077 
September 2, 2020 – 2024  $150  $134,155  $150  $134,155 
September 2, 2025 – 2029  $200  $178,873   200   178,873 

 

In August 2017, we2023, Round Top paid the State of Texas a delay rental to extend the Stateterm of Texasthe lease in thean amount of $67,077.equal to $134,155

 


November 2011 Lease

 

On November 1, 2011, we entered intothe Company executed a mining lease with the State of Texas covering approximately 90 acres more or less, of land that is adjacent to the land we purchased in September 2011 near our Round Top site. The deed was recorded with Hudspeth County on September 16, 2011.August 2010 Lease. Under the lease, wethe Company paid the State of Texas a lease bonus of $20,700 which was paid$20,700 upon the execution of the lease. Upon the sale of minerals removed from the Round Top weProject, Round Top will be required to pay the State of Texas a $50,000$50,000 minimum advance royalty. Thereafter, weif paying quantities of minerals are obtained, Round Top will be required to pay the State of Texas a production royalty equal to eight percent (8%) of the market value of uranium and other fissionable materials removed and sold from the Round Top Project and six and one quarter percent (6 1/4%) of the market value of all other minerals sold from Round Top.

Thereafter, assuming production ofminerals. If paying quantities hashave not been obtained, weRound Top may pay additional delay rental fees to extend the term of the lease for successive one (1)(1) year periods pursuant to the following schedule:


NOTE 45 – MINERAL PROPERTIES (Continued)(CONTINUED)

Schedule of November 2011 Lease

   Per Acre
Amount
  Total
Amount
 
November 1, 2015 – 2019  $75  $6,750 
November 1, 2020 – 2024  $150  $13,500 
November 1, 2025 – 2029  $200  $18,000 

  Per Acre
Amount
  Total
Amount
 
November 1, 2020 – 2024 $150  $13,500 
November 1, 2025 – 2029  200   18,000 

 

In October 2017, weAugust 2023, Round Top paid the State of Texas a delay rental to extend the Stateterm of Texas of $6,750.the lease in an amount equal to $13,500.

 

March 2013 Lease

 

On March 6, 2013, wethe Company purchased lease with Southwest Range & Wildlife Foundation, Inc., a Texas non-profit corporation (the “Foundation”), pursuant to which the Foundation agreed to assign to us a surface lease identified withat the State of TexasRound Top Project, known as Surface Lease SL20040002 (the “West Lease”), which covers 54,990.11 acres in Hudspeth County, Texas. In exchange for the West Lease, wefrom the Southwest Wildlife and Range Foundation (since renamed the Rio Grande Foundation) for $500,000 cash and 1,063,830 shares of common stock valued at $500,000. The Company also agreed to: (i) payto support the Foundation $500,000 in cash; (ii) issue 1,063,830through an annual payment of our common shares, par value $0.01 (the “Common Shares”); and (iii) make $45,000 for ten (10) payments to the Foundation of $45,000 each. The first payment was made in June 2013, and the nine (9) subsequent payments due on or before June 1 of each of the following years such payments to be used by the Foundation to support conservation efforts within the Rio Grande Basin. The West Lease Assignment Agreement contains standard representations, warrantiescomprises approximately 54,990 acres. The purchase of the surface lease provides unrestricted surface access for the potential development and covenants.mining of the Round Top Project.

 

As of August 31, 2017, the Company has not paid the June 2016 or 2017 payments for $45,000, respectively. The Foundation has not given notice of default or made any demand for payment as of the date of this filing. However, based upon the Company being in default on the lease agreement there is no guarantee that the Foundation will allow the Company to begin mining operations or to bring the lease payments current without requiring the Company to provided additional consideration to the Foundation. Consequently, since the Company cannot be guaranteed the ability to utilize the lease due to its current default status, the Company has written off the value of the West lease ($1,394,852) as of August 31, 2017. The Company intends to continue with the evaluation of the mineral potential of the property, to ultimately mine the property, and to bring the lease current when funds are available. Expensing the value of the West Lease does not restrict our access to the mineral leases.

October 2014 Surface Option and Water Lease

 

InOn October 29, 2014, we executed an agreementthe Company announced the execution of agreements with the Texas General Land Office securing the option to purchase the surface rights covering the potential Round Top project mine and plant areas and, separately, a lease to develop the water necessary for the potential Round Top project mine operations.

groundwater lease. The option to purchase the surface rights covers approximately 5,670 acres over the mining lease and the additional acreage adequate to site all potential heap leaching and processing operations as currently anticipated by the Company. Welease. Round Top may exercise the option for all or part of the option acreage at any time during the sixteen yearsixteen-year primary term of the mineral lease. The option can be kept current by anmaintained through annual paymentpayments of $10,000, which has not been paid as of December 11, 2017.$10,000. The purchase price will be the appraised value of the surface at the time of exercisingoption exercise. All annual payments have been made as of the option.date of this filing.

 

The ground water lease secures ourthe right to develop the ground water within a 13,120 acre-acre lease area located approximately 4 miles from the Round Top deposit. The lease area contains five existing water wells. It is anticipated that all potential water needs for the Round Top project mine operations would be satisfied by the existing wells covered by this water lease. This lease hasterms include an annual minimum production payment of $5,000$5,000 prior to production of water for the operation, which has not been paid as of December 11, 2017.operation. After initiation of production weRound Top will pay $0.95$0.95 per thousand gallons or $20,000$20,000 annually, whichever is greater. This lease remains effective asin effect so long as the mineral lease is in effect.

 


The Pagnotti Enterprises Inc. Memorandum of UnderstandingSanta Fe Gold Corporation/Alhambra Project

 

On June 28, 2016 TMRC executedIn November 2021, the Company entered into a Memorandummineral exploration and option agreement with Santa Fe Gold Corporation (“Santa Fe”). Under the option agreement, the Company and Santa Fe plan to pursue, negotiate and subsequently enter into a joint venture agreement to jointly explore and develop a target silver property to be selected by the Company among patented and unpatented mining claims held by Santa Fe within the Black Hawk Mining District in Grant County, New Mexico. Completion of understanding with Pagnotti Enterprises Inc. (“PEI”)a joint venture agreement, if any, is subject to the successful outcome of Wilkes Barre, Pennsylvania, ownersa multi-phase exploration plan leading to a bankable feasibility study to be undertaken in the near future by the Company. Under the contemplated terms of the Jeddo Coal Co., whereby under specifiedproposed joint venture agreement, the Company would be project operator and initially own 50.5% of the joint venture while Santa Fe would initially own 49.5%. Additional terms TMRC could lease one or more of Jeddo’s deposits locatedthe joint venture are expected to be negotiated between the Company and Santa Fe in the anthracite region of northeast Pennsylvania. Research by the Department of Energy (DOE) has shown that these coal deposits and the sandstones and siltstones immediately associated with them contain anomalously high values of rare earth and on particular interest, Scandium. The DOE research to date has indicated that the rare earth can be efficiently extracted from pulverized rock using ammonium sulfate as the lixiviant. TMRC is in the process of preparing an application for a federal grant to design and construct a continuous ion exchange/continuous ion chromatography (CIX/CIC) pilot plant to be delivered to a designated project area in the Appalachian coal province. TMRC and its co-applicants, K-Tech, Inventure Renewables, of Tuscaloosa, Alabama and Penn State University are proposing to plan, develop, design and install the CIX/CIC pilot plant at one of the Jeddo Coal properties. The grant was awarded in March 2017 to the consortium consisting of Inventure Renewables, Penn State, K-Tech and TMRC with Inventure being the principal investigator in the consortium. Funding began in September 2017.future. 

 

Under the terms of the Memorandumoption agreement, the Company plans to conduct a district-wide evaluation among the patented and unpatented claims held by Santa Fe, consisting of Understanding (MOU) signed 28 June 2016, TMRC had a six month term to performgeologic mapping, sampling, trenching, radiometric surveying, geophysics, drilling and/or other methods as warranted. Based on the necessary due diligencedistrict-wide evaluation, the Company will designate one 80-acre tract as the “project area” and to technicallycommence detailed exploration work. The property covered in the option agreement is approximately 1,300 acres and economically evaluate the properties. Upon executioncovers approximately 75% of the MOU TMRC and PEI had six monthsknown mining district. The area to draft and executebe studied also includesformal leasetwo-mile radius “area of interest.” The option agreement containing all the standard terms of mining lease agreements. Upon execution of a lease, TMRC will be obligated to pay a $5,000 per month rental or a 12% royalty whichever is greater. As of the date of this filing, no lease has been executed.

F-16 

NOTE 5 – NOTES PAYABLE

In relation to the Foundation lease discussed in Note 2provides the Company recorded a note payable for an amount forwith the initial $45,000 due upon signingright to designate any properties within the “area of lease and the nine (9) future payments due of $45,000 which has been recorded at its present value discounted with an imputed interest rate of 5% for a total note payable of $364,852. As of the date of this filing, we have not paid the June 2016 or 2017 installment of our surface lease, in the amount of $45,000 each, to the Southwest Wildlife Foundation. As a result the full amount of the note payable has been classifiedinterest” as currently due. The note payable balance as of August 31, 2017 and 2016 was approximately $260,000. The Company has also accrued interest expense as of August 31, 2017 and 2016 of $33,750 and $18,750, respectively. This unpaid interest is included in accrued liabilities.“project area” properties.

 

The Foundation has not given notice of default or made any demand for payment as of the date of this filing. However, based upon the Company being in default on the Note Payable there is no guarantee that the Foundation will allow the Company to begin mining operations or to bring the lease payments current without requiring the Company to provided additional consideration to the Foundation. Consequently, since the Company cannot be guaranteed the ability to utilize the lease due to its current default status, the Company has written off the value of this lease ($1,394,852) as of August 31, 2017. The Company intends to continue with the evaluation of the mineral potential of the property, to ultimately mine the property, and to bring this note payable and its accrued interest current when the funds are available.

Related Party Notes Payable and Advances

On July 1, 2016 the Company received two loans for $2,500 each from two directors of the Company. The loans are non-interest accruing, unsecured and due upon demand. As additional consideration for the loans, we issued 5,000 common stock purchase warrants to each individual. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.10 and term of five years. The warrants had a fair value of $1,185 at the date of issuance determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The assumptions used to calculate the fair market value are as follows: (i) risk-free interest rate of 1.00% (ii) estimated volatility of 185% (iii) dividend yield of 0.00% and (iv) expected life of the warrants of five years. The notes payable balance as of August 31, 2017 and August 31, 2016 was a total of $5,000. The value of the warrants was expensed as interest expense at the time of issuance due to no stated term on the advances.

On September 1, 2016, the Company entered into five loans totaling $71,500 from five directors of the Company. The loans were due March 1, 2017, are non-interest bearing, and unsecured. As of this filing the loans are in default and due upon demand. As additional consideration for the loans, we issued in total 147,000 common stock purchase warrants. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.10 and term of five years. The loans have a relative fair value of $57,414 and the warrants have a relative fair value of $14,086 at the date of issuance determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The assumptions used to calculate the fair market value are as follows: (i) risk-free interest rate of 1.180% (ii) estimated volatility of 245% (iii) dividend yield of 0.00% and (iv) expected life of the warrants of five years. The notes payable balance as of August 31, 2017 and August 31, 2016 was $71,500. The value of the warrant was amortized to interest expense over the term of the note payable.option is for so long as the Company continues to conduct exploration activities in the Project Area and can be exercised on 60 days’ notice to Santa Fe.


 

On November 1, 2016 the Company entered into two loans for $4,000 and $1,000 from two directors of the Company. The loans are non-interest bearing, unsecured and due upon demand. As additional consideration for the loans, we issued 8,000 and 2,000 common stock purchase warrants to each individual. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.10 and term of five years. The warrants had a fair value of $1,057 at the date of issuance determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The assumptions used to calculate the fair market value are as follows: (i) risk-free interest rate of 1.30% (ii) estimated volatility of 181% (iii) dividend yield of 0.00% and (iv) expected life of the warrants of five years. The notes payable balance as of August 31, 2017 was $5,000. The value of the warrants was expensed as interest expense at the time of issuance due to no stated term on the advance.


On December 12, 2016, the Company entered into a loan for $15,000 a director of the Company. The loan is due June 12, 2017, is non-interest accruing, and unsecured. As of this filing the loan is in default and due upon demand. As additional consideration for the loan, we issued 60,000 common stock purchase warrants to the individual. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.10 and term of five years. The loan has a relative fair value of $10,437 and the warrants have a relative fair value of $4,563 at the date of issuance determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The assumptions used to calculate the fair market value are as follows: (i) risk-free interest rate of 1.90% (ii) estimated volatility of 241% (iii) dividend yield of 0.00% and (iv) expected life of the warrants of five years. The notes payable balance as of August 31, 2017 was $15,000. The value of the warrant was amortized to interest expense over the term of the note payable.

On January 12, 2017 the Company entered into two loans totaling $20,000 from a director and an officer of the Company. The loans are due July 12, 2017, are non-interest accruing, and unsecured. As of this filing the loans are in default and due upon demand. As additional consideration for the loans, we issued 40,000 common stock purchase warrants to each individual. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.10 and term of five years. The loans have a relative fair value of $13,542 and the warrants have a relative fair value of $6,458 at the date of issuance determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The assumptions used to calculate the fair market value are as follows: (i) risk-free interest rate of 1.87% (ii) estimated volatility of 240% (iii) dividend yield of 0.00% and (iv) expected life of the warrants of five years. The notes payable balance as of August 31, 2017 was $20,000. The value of the warrant was amortized to interest expense over the term of the note payable.

During the three months ended May 31, 2017 the Company entered into eight loans totaling $47,500 from two directors of the Company. The loans are non-interest accruing, unsecured and due upon demand. As additional consideration for the loans, we issued in total 190,000 common stock purchase warrants. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.17 - $0.21 and a term of five years. The warrants had a fair value of $39,557 at the date of issuance determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The assumptions used to calculate the fair market value are as follows: (i) risk-free interest rate of 1.75% (ii) estimated volatility of 234% (iii) dividend yield of 0.00% and (iv) expected life of the warrants of five years. The notes payable balance as of August 31, 2017 was $47,500. The value of the warrants was expensed as interest expense at the time of issuance due to no stated term on the advance.

During the three months ended August 31, 2017 the Company entered into seven loans totaling $82,165 from two directors of the Company. The loans are non-interest accruing, unsecured and due upon demand. As additional consideration for the loans, we issued in total 328,660 common stock purchase warrants. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.20 - $0.23 and a term of five years. The warrants have a fair value of $65,137 at the date of issuance determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The assumptions used to calculate the fair market value are as follows: (i) risk-free interest rate of 1.75% (ii) estimated volatility of 169% (iii) dividend yield of 0.00% and (iv) expected life of the warrants of five years. The notes payable balance as of August 31, 2017 was $82,165. The value of the warrants was expensed as interest expense at the time of issuance due to no stated term on the advance.

The Company has recorded total discounts on the notes payable in the amount of $25,107 which has been expensed during the year ended August 31, 2017, as amortization of discounts on the notes payable.


NOTE 6 – INCOME TAXES

 

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the federal income tax benefit to the United States federal statutory rate of 21% for the years ended August 31, 20172023 and 2016:2022:

Schedule of effective income tax rate reconciliation

  2017  2016 
Loss before provision for income taxes $(2,135,126) $(1,213,939)
         
Income tax benefit at 34% statutory rate  725,943   412,739 
         
Non-deductible business meals and entertainment  (193)  (206)
         
Increase in valuation allowance  (725,750)  (412,533)
         
  $  $ 
  2023  2022 
Income tax benefit at 21% statutory rate $544,311  $609,785 
Stock-based compensation  (199,950)  (105,723)
(Increase) decrease in valuation allowance  (344,361)  (504,062)
 $  $ 

 

The tax effects of the temporary differences between reportable financial statement income and taxable income are recognized as a deferred tax asset and liability. Significant components of the deferred tax assets are set out below along with a valuation allowance to reduce the net deferred tax asset to zero.

 

Management has established a valuation allowance because, based on an analysis of the potential that the tax benefits underlying deferred tax asset may notassets, it is unable to establish that it is more-likely-than-not that a tax benefit will be realized. Significant components of our deferred tax asset at August 31, 20172023 and 20162022 are as follows:

Schedule of deferred tax assets and liabilities

 2017  2016  2023  2022 
Net operating loss carryforward $4,364,324  $4,189,910  $4,702,990  $4,522,754 
        
Stock-based compensation  1,694,459   1,649,967 
        
Assets, exploration cost, depreciation and amortization  3,734,534   3,703,770 
        
Impairment of surface lease  474,070   —  
        
Difference in property and equipment basis  961,015   796,890 
Less valuation allowance  (10,267,388)  (9,543,646)  (5,664,005)  (5,319,644)
        
Net deferred tax asset $  $  $  $ 

 

As a result of a change in control effective in April 2007, our net operating losses prior to that date may be partially or entirely unavailable byunder tax law, to offset future income and,and; accordingly, these net operating losses are excluded from the associated deferred tax asset.assets.

 

The gross net operating loss carryforward in the approximate amount of $12,691,000 will begin$22,395,000 began to expire in 2022. We fileThe Company files income tax returns in the United States and in one state jurisdiction. With few exceptions, we arethe Company is no longer subject to United States federal income tax examinations for fiscal years ending before 2011,2021 and is no longer subject to state tax examinations for years before 2010.2020. 

We also record any financial statement recognition and disclosure requirements for uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.  Financial statement recognition of the tax position is dependent on an assessment of a 50% or greater likelihood that the tax position will be sustained upon examination, based on the technical merits of the position.  Any interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions are recorded as interest expense. We believe we have no uncertain tax positions at August 31, 2017 and 2016.


NOTE 7 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

OurThe Company’s authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares of common stock, with a par value of $0.01$0.01 per share, and 10,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $0.001$0.001 per share.

 

All shares of common stock have equal voting rights and, when validly issued and outstanding, are entitled to one non-cumulative vote per share in all matters to be voted upon by shareholders. The sharesShares of common stock have no pre-emptive, subscription, conversion or redemption rights and may be issued only as fully paid and non-assessable shares. Holders of the common stock are entitled to equal ratable rights to dividends and distributions with respect to the common stock, as may be declared by ourthe Company’s Board of Directors (our(the “Board”) out of funds legally available. In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Corporation,Company, the holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining available for distribution to them after payment or provision for all liabilities and any preferential liquidation rights of any preferred stock then outstanding.

We have 44,941,532 shares of our common stock outstanding as of August 31, 2017.


NOTE 7 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Continued)(CONTINUED)

Following is an analysis of common stock issuances during the years ended August 31, 2023 and 2022:

Issuances during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2023

In October 2022, we issued 26,833 shares of common stock related to director fees earned and expensed during the year ended August 31, 2022.

During the year ended August 31, 2023, the Company issued 109,711 shares of common stock valued at a market value of $128,167, as payment for director fees. In addition, the Company recognized stock compensation and a corresponding charge to additional paid-in capital in the amount of $39,503 for director’s fees earned during the quarter ended August 31, 2023. The Company issued the related 56,547 shares of common stock in October 2023.

In January 2020, the Company entered into three separate consulting agreements for total consideration of 699,999 shares of common stock (233,333 per agreement). The common stock underlying the agreements had a total market value of $448,000, based on the $0.64 quoted market price per share of the common stock on the agreement date. The right to receive the common stock is subject to ratable vesting over a 24-month period and at August 31, 2022, all 699,999 shares had vested and 87,501 shares had been issued. The Company recognized $0 and $74,667 of compensation expense under these consulting agreements during the years ended August 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The consultants had requested that the Company hold the remaining shares issuable under the agreements in trust to allow the consultants to request their shares as they vest. During the year ended August 31, 2023, the Company issued the remaining 612,498 shares under the agreement.

During the year ended August 31, 2023, the holders of 110,000 common stock options were exercised for total cash consideration of $38,000. The exercise price of the common stock options ranged from $0.22 to $0.45 per share.

Issuance during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2022

In October 2021, the Company issued 41,231 shares of common stock related to Director fees earned and expensed during the year ended August 31, 2021.

During the year ended August 31, 2022, the Company issued 90,594 shares of common stock at a market value of $136,505, as payment for director fees. In addition, the Company recognized stock compensation and a corresponding charge to additional paid-in capital in the amount of $41,502 for director’s fees earned during the quarter ended August 31, 2022. The Company issued the related 26,833 shares of common stock in October 2022.

During the year ended August 31, 2022, the holders of 720,000 common stock options and 6,000 common stock warrants exercised the related instruments for total cash consideration of $239,700. The exercise price of the common stock options ranged from $0.30 to $0.45 per share and the exercise price of the common stock warrants were $0.20 per share.

During the year ended August 31, 2022, a total of 100,000 common stock options were exercised on a cashless basis into 77,330 shares of common stock. The common stock options had an exercise price of $0.45 per share.


NOTE 7 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (CONTINUED)

Options

 

The following table sets forth certain information as of August 31, 20172023 and 20162022 concerning our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options notissued under the Amended 2008 planPlan and pursuant to purchasesoutside of stock under the Amended 2008 Plan:Plan (all options are fully vested and exercisable at August 31, 2023 and 2022):

Schedule of options

  Shares  

Weighted
Average
Exercise  

Price 

  

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life  

(In Years) 

  

Aggregate
Intrinsic  

Value 

 
Outstanding, vested and exercisable at August 31, 2021  1,477,500  $0.40   2.68  $1,523,430 
Options granted  120,000   0.30       
Options exercised  (820,000)  0.35       
Options cancelled/forfeited/expired  (257,500)  0.45       
 
                
Outstanding, vested and exercisable at August 31, 2022  520,000   0.31   2.79   693,300 
Options granted  620,000   1.11       
Options exercised  (110,000)  0.35       
Options cancelled forfeited/expired            
                 
Options vested and exercisable at August 31, 2023  1,030,000  $0.80   4.37  $784,476 

 

  Shares  

Weighted

Average

Exercise Price

  

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Contractual Life (In Years)

  

Grant

Date

Fair

Value

 
Outstanding at August 31, 2015  6,290,000  $0.94   4.67  $11,764,532 
                 
Options granted  120,000   0.30   4.53   19,471 
                 
Options exercised            
                 
Options cancelled/forfeited/expired  (775,000)         
                 
Outstanding at August 31, 2016  5,635,000   0.61   3.43   11,784,003 
                 
Vested and exercisable at August 31, 2016  5,635,000   0.61   3.43   11,784,003 
                 
Options granted  120,000   0.30   4.53   18,907 
                 
Options exercised            
                 
Options cancelled/forfeited/expired            
                 
Outstanding at August 31, 2017  5,755,000  $0.60   2.59  $11,802,910 
                 
Vested and exercisable at August 31, 2017  5,755,000  $0.60   2.59  $11,802,910 

In September 2008, the Board adopted the 2008 Stock Option Plan (the “2008 Plan”), which was approved by the Company’s shareholders and provided 2,000,000 shares available for grant. In 2011, 2012, and 2016, the Board adopted amendments to the 2008 Plan, approved by the shareholders, that increased the shares available for issuance under the 2008 Plan by a total of 7,000,000 shares (as amended, the “Amended 2008 Plan”). No further derivative securities are eligible to be issued pursuant to the Amended 2008 Plan.

 

During the year ended August 31, 2023, the Company granted a total of 120,000 non-qualified, non-plan stock options, with a fair value of $146,928 on the date of grant, to a consultant. The fair value of the options was determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The weighted average assumptions used to calculate the fair market value are as follows: (i) risk-free interest rate of 4.00%, (ii) estimated volatility of 202% (iii) dividend yield of 0.00% and (iv) expected life of all options of 5 years. The Company recognized the full $146,928 as compensation expense during the year ended August 31, 2023.

During the year ended August 31, 2023, the Company granted a total of 500,000 non-qualified, non-plan stock options, with a fair value of $637,548 on the date of grant, to Mr. Marchese for services rendered as chairman of the board of directors. The fair value of the options was determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The weighted average assumptions used to calculate the fair market value are as follows: (i) risk-free interest rate of 5.00%, (ii) estimated volatility of 194% (iii) dividend yield of 0.00% and (iv) expected life of all options of 5 years. The Company recognized the full $637,548 as compensation expense during the year ended August 31, 2023.

During the year ended August 31, 2022, the Company granted a total of 120,000 non-qualified, non-plan stock options, with a fair value of $250,768 on the date of grant, to a consultant. The fair value of the options was determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The weighted average assumptions used to calculate the fair market value are as follows: (i) risk-free interest rate between 0.25% and 2.33% (ii) estimated volatility between 197% and 202% (iii) dividend yield of 0.00% and (iv) expected life of all options of 5 years. The Company recognized the full $250,768 as compensation expense during the year ended August 31, 2022.


NOTE 7 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Continued)(CONTINUED)

 

Warrants

 

Warrant activity for the years ended August 31, 20172023 and 2016 are2022 was as follows: 

Schedule of warrants

 Shares  

Weighted

Average

Exercise Price

  

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Contractual Life (In Years)

  

Grant

Date

Fair

Value

  Shares  

Weighted
Average
Exercise  

Price

 

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life  

(In Years)

 

Aggregate
Intrinsic  

Value

 
Outstanding at August 31, 2015  18,291,550  $1.54   2.37  $4,291,419 
                
Outstanding and exercisable at August 31, 2021  34,000  $0.10   1.2  $45,660 
Warrants granted  6,605,000   0.35   4.24   434,905             
                
Warrants exercised              (6,000)  0.20       
                
Warrants cancelled/forfeited/expired  (9,587,000)           (16,000)  0.10       
                
Outstanding at August 31, 2016  15,309,550   0.39   3.75   4,726,324 
                
Vested and exercisable at August 31, 2016  15,309,550   0.39   3.75   4,726,324 
                
Outstanding and exercisable at August 31, 2022  12,000   0.04   1.0   23,780 
Warrants granted  815,660   0.17   4.63   130,858             
                
Warrants exercised                        
                
Warrants cancelled/forfeited/expired            
                
Outstanding at August 31, 2017  16,125,210  $0.38   2.83  $4,857,182 
                
Vested and exercisable at August 31, 2017  16,125,210  $0.38   2.83  $4,857,182 
Warrants cancelled forfeited/expired  (12,000)  0.04       
Outstanding and exercisable at August 31, 2023    $     $ 

 


NOTE 8 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONSSUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In October 2023, we issued 56,547 shares of common stock to our directors for accrued director fees earned from June through August 2023.

 

The Company has received advancesdid not make its required October, November and December cash call in the amount of $133,000, $120,000 and $143,249, respectively. Consequently, the Company’s interest in RTMD decreased from certain Directors19.874% at August 31, 2023 to 19.803% at September 30, 2023, 19.726% at October 31, 2023, and Officers. The advances totaled approximately $169,665 and $76,500to 19.611% as of August 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The Company rents office space on a month to month basis of $1,600 from a director.November 22, 2023.

 


55

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.None

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

At the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2017,2023, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision of and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operations of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation the CEO and the CFO have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective in ensuring that: (i) information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit to the SEC under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable rules and forms and (ii) material information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow for accurate and timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management determined that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective during the period covered by this Annual Report because during the period the Company held its annual meeting of stockholders on February 24, 2016, but failed to include in its proxy statement for the meeting prepared under Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers as was required under Rule 14a-21(a) under the Exchange Act. The omission was inadvertent and the Company intends to include the advisory vote to approve the compensation of its named executive officers in its proxy statement under Regulation 14A for its next annual meeting of stockholders. The Company is implementing additional internal procedures, to ensure that all requirements, including the requirements of Rule 14a-21, are met in future filings.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and Rule 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Ourprinciples (“GAAP”). Management has assessed the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detections of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effectbased on the financial statements.

73 

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2017. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth in the Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission 2016 (COSO)(“COSO”) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. BasedA material weakness, as defined by SEC rules, is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on our assessment, management identifieda timely basis. The material weaknesses related to: (i)in internal control over financial reporting that were identified are:

a)We did not maintain sufficient personnel with an appropriate level of technical accounting knowledge, experience, and training in the application of U.S. GAAP commensurate with our complexity and our financial accounting and reporting requirements. We have limited experience in the areas of financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. As a result, there is a lack of monitoring of the financial reporting process and there is a reasonable possibility that material misstatements of the financial statements, including disclosures, will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis; and

b)Due to our small size, we do not have a proper segregation of duties in certain areas of our financial reporting process. The areas where we have a lack of segregation of duties include cash receipts and disbursements, approval of purchases and approval of accounts payable invoices for payment. This control deficiency, which is pervasive in nature, results in a reasonable possibility that material misstatements of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

As a result of the existence of these material weaknesses as of August 31, 2023, management has concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2023, based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that permit the company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes to Internal Controls and Procedures over Financial Reporting

We regularly review our system of internal control over financial reporting to ensure we maintain an effective internal control environment. There were no changes in our internal review functions, (ii) a lack of segregation of incompatible dutiescontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the year that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Remediation Plans

We will look to increase our personnel resources and technical accounting expertise within the accounting functions, (iii)function. Management believes that hiring additional knowledgeable personnel with technical accounting expertise will remedy the material weakness: insufficient personnel with an appropriate level of technical accounting knowledge, experience, and training in the application of GAAP commensurate with our complexity and our financial accounting and reporting requirements, and (iv) a lack of oversight to ensure adequate documentation to support routine and non-recurring transactions. As a result, management concluded that, as of August 31, 2017, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting were not effective. Due to our size and the limited nature of our operations, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. These weaknesses are due to our inadequate staffing during the period covered by this report and our lack of working capital to hire additional staff. Although management will periodically re-evaluate this situation, at this point it considers that the risk associated with such lack of segregation of duties and the potential benefits of adding employees to segregate such duties are not cost justified. We are in the process of determining how best to change our current system and implement a more effective system. However, there can be no assurance that implementation of any change will be completed in a timely manner or that it will be adequate once implemented. To the extent possible, we will implement procedures to assure that the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions will be performed by separate individuals.requirements.

56

 

Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to Section 404(c) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, which provides that issuers that are not an “accelerated filer” or “large accelerated filer” are exempt from the requirement to provide an auditor attestation report.

Changes to Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have not been changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the year ended August 31, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS

Not applicable.

74 

57

 

 

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our current directors and executive officers. The term for each director expires at our next Annual Meeting or until his or her successor is appointed and qualified. The ages of the directors and officers are shown as of December 2017:August 31, 2023:

NameAgeCurrent Office with CompanyPositions Held Since
Daniel E. Gorski8086

Director

Chief Executive Officer

January 2007

August 2012

Anthony Marchese6167DirectorDecember 2009
Cecil Wall8692DirectorAugust 20122007
Nicholas PingitorePeter Denetclaw7364DirectorAugust 20122019
James WolfeLaVern (Vern) Kenneth Lund8150DirectorAugust 2012May 2022
Kevin Francis63DirectorNovember 2020
Wm Chris Mathers5864Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 2016

 

Directors

Daniel E. Gorski Mr. Gorski has served as a director of the Company since January 20062007 and as the Company’s chief executive officer since August 2012. Prior thereto, Mr. Gorski served as the Company’s president and chief executive officer from January 2007 to May 2011 and chief operating officer from May 2011 to December 2011. From July 2004 to January 2006, Mr. Gorski was the co-founder and vice president of operations for High Plains Uranium Inc., a uranium exploration and development company that went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange in December 2005. Between June 1996 to May 2004, Mr. Gorski served as an officer and director of Metalline Mining Co., a publicly traded mining and development company with holdings in the Sierra Mojada Mining District, Coahuila, Mexico. From January 1992 to June 1996, Mr. Gorski was the exploration geologist under contract to USMX Inc. and worked exclusively in Latin America. Mr. Gorski earned a BS in 1960 from Sul Ross State College, in Alpine, Texas and an MA in 1970 from the University of Texas in Austin, Texas. Mr. Gorski has over forty-threeforty-five years of experience in the mining industry.

Mr. Gorski’s extensive technical knowledge and experience in the mining industry combined with his historical relationship with the Company’s principal property, the Round Top project, permits Mr. Gorski to provide the Board with valuable insight to the exploration and development of the Round Top project. Accordingly, the Board believes that Mr. Gorski should serve on the Board.

Anthony Marchese – Mr. Marchese has served as a director since December 2009. Since May 2012,July 2018, Mr. Marchese has served as a Managing DirectorPresident of the Capital Markets Group at TriPoint Global Equities,Marchese Management Co., LLC, a New York based FINRA member broker/dealer.strategic advisory firm that consults to both public and private emerging growth companies. Mr. Marchese also serves as the general partner and chief investment officer of the Insiders Trend Fund, LP, an investment partnership whose mandate is to invest in those public companies whose officers and/or directors have been active acquirers of their own stock. Mr. Marchese’s prior experience includes TriPoint Global Equities (Managing Director/Capital Markets- 2012-2018), Axiom Capital Management, Inc. (Managing Director – 2011-2012), Monarch Capital Group, LLC (President and Chief Operating Officer – 2003 to 2011), Laidlaw Equities (senior vice president - April 1997 to March 2002), Southcoast Capital (senior vice president – May 1988 to April 1997), Oppenheimer & Co (limited partner – September 1982 to May 1988), Prudential-Bache (vice president – July 1981 to August 1982) and the General Motors Corporation (analyst – June 1980 to June 1981). Mr. Marchese served in the military with the Army Security Agency and the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command. Mr. Marchese received an MBA in Finance from the University of Chicago.

75 

Mr. Marchese provides the Board with exceptional leadership and management knowledge, having gained extensive management and corporate finance experience during the course of his career. Mr. Marchese’s specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills described above led the Board to conclude that Mr. Marchese should serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Cecil C. Wall – Cecil C. Wall was born in Duchene County, Utah in 1931. Mr. Wall attended Carbon County College and Utah State University. In 1969, he acquired control of a publicly traded company, Altex Oil Co. (formerly known as Mountain Valley Uranium), listed on the American Stock Exchange. Under Mr. Wall’s leadership, Altex established a 20,000 acre position in what became the Greater Altamont Field at Altamont, Utah. Mr. Wall sold his interest in Altex in 1985. Mr. Wall was also part of the founding group for the 2007 reorganization of Standard Silver Corp. which became TMRC. He sat on the TMRC board of directors and served as the Secretary and Treasurer from January 2004 to April 2012. He is currently the manager for C-Wall Investment Company, LLC, a Utah Limited Liability Company. In addition, he is the president of several family-owned private companies, and he brings wide business experience and close relations with many of the original shareholders.

Mr. Wall’s past experience with the Company as its Secretary and Treasurer and his past experience with public companies serve the Board at this time by providing needed guidance on public company matters and insight into the Company’s historical operations. Mr. Wall’s specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills described above led the Board to conclude that Mr. Wall should serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

58

 

Dr. Nicholas PingitorePeter Denetclaw, Jr.Dr. Nicholas Pingitore was born in New York City in 1944. Dr. Pingitore holds an AB degree from Columbia College (NYC, 1965) andMr. Denetclaw has served as a Masters (ScM) and PhD from Brown University (Providence RI, 1968 & 1973) in Geology. Since 1977, hemanager of Freeport McMoran since 2008. Mr. Denetclaw has held a full-time faculty appointment at UTEP. In addition to being a Texas Licensed Geoscientist, Dr. Pingitore is a memberserved as vice-chair of the American Chemical Society, Geochemical Society, American Associationmanagement committee for the Advancement of Science, American Geophysical Union, Materials Research Society, Mineralogical Society of America, Society for American Archaeology, Society for Commercial Archaeology, American Rock Art Research Association, International Society for Reef Studies, Society of Economic PaleontologistsNavajo Transitional Energy Company since 2014. Mr. Denetclaw’s specific mining and Mineralogists, and Society of the Sigma Xi. He has served for 25 years as Director of UTEP’s Electron Microprobe Laboratory, and he expects to use this instrument to study the Round Top minerals. The 2,500-foot-square geochemical laboratory that Dr. Pingitore also anticipates using to conduct research sponsored by TMRC includes three x-ray fluorescence units, a high resolution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer, various optical microscopes, and sample preparation facilities. Since 2000, he has been project director of approximately $7,000,000 in research funding, and a co-investigator on another $10,000,000 in grants. He has established a record for successfully managing and completing large institutional projects on time and on budget. Dr. Pingitore considers Round Top to be a national treasure. He is ready to bring his wide geologic and chemical experience, his project skills, and his insight from decades of investment in the extractive industries, to help unlock the riches of this deposit.

Mr. Pingitore’s extensivebusiness experience and education in geology bring valuable expertise to the Board in relation to the Board’s oversight of the Company’s exploration and potential development activities at its Round Top project.  Mr. Pingitore’s specific experience, qualifications attributes and skills described above led the Board to conclude that Mr. PingitoreDenetclaw, Jr. should serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

76 

Dr. James R. WolfeLaVern Kenneth LundDr. WolfeMr. Lund began his career as an Engineer with North American Coal Corporation (NACoal) in 1996. Mr. Lund has served as chief executive officer of Navajo Transitional Energy Company since February 1, 2022. Over the past 25 years prior to Navajo Transitional Energy Company, Mr. Lund had held various technical, operational management and the firm he co-foundedexecutive level positions, including over 18 years of field operating experience while working at five different surface mines located in 1995, Pacific Materials Resources, Inc. (“PMR”), were among the pioneers of the China-U.S. rare earth industryNorth Dakota, Texas and trade. As Vice President of PMR from 1995 to 2010, Dr. Wolfe interfaced between the major rare earth producers in China andMississippi. Mr. Lund is a broad spectrum of rare earth consumersRegistered Professional Engineer in the U.S. Prior to founding PMR,state of Mississippi. He also holds a Masters of Business Administration from 1992 to 1995, Dr. Wolfe was PresidentAuburn University and is a graduate of MPV Lanthanides, Inc., a rare earth joint venture between China Metallurgical Import/Export of Inner MongoliaWharton Advanced Management Program. Mr. Lund’s specific mining and U.S. interests. From 1979 to 1995, Dr. Wolfe’s professional interests centered on resource recovery from industrial and mining wastes. He served as a consultant to the steel industry, co-founded Exmet Corporation (zinc from smelter dust) and served as Executive Vice President of Williams Strategic Metals, Inc. and its predecessor, Nedlog Technology Group, Inc. Dr. Wolfe developed and implemented projects for the recovery of cobalt from slags, indium from smelter dusts, and rare earths from mine tailings. In 1970, while he was employed by the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Dr. Wolfe invented and patented a plasma method for producing ultra-fine refractory metal carbides. He co-founded Cal-Met Industries, Inc. in 1973 to commercialize the plasma technology. Cal-Met was bought by Fansteel Corporation in 1975. Dr. Wolfe was employed by Fansteel from 1975 to 1979 to implement the plasma technology for the manufacture of drill bits and cutting tools. Dr. Wolfe was employed by the AVCO Corporation as a space research scientist from 1965 to 1968, while working for his doctorate. Dr. Wolfe received his BS and MS in Metallurgical Engineering from the University of Washington and his PhD from the University of Missouri-Rolla in 1968. He is currently the Secretary and Trustee of The Biella Foundation.

Mr. Wolf’sbusiness experience and knowledge in the rare earth sector and his education metallurigcal engineering are valuable to the Board as it assesses its potential mine development plan at its exploration stage Round Top project.  Mr. Wolf’s specific experience, qualifications attributes and skills described above led the Board to conclude that Mr. WolfLund should serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Kevin Francis – Mr. Francis has served as principal of Mineral Resource Management LLC since April 2016, providing project management, technical and expert witness services, and permitting leadership to the mining industry. Mr. Francis served as vice president of project development of Aurcana Corporation from March 2017 to June 2019, managing and advancing all technical studies. Mr. Francis served as vice president, technical services and general manager of Oracle Mining Corp. from May 2012 to May 2016 (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Oracle Mining Corp. was placed into a court-ordered receivership in 2015), managing interdisciplinary technical functions including direction of geologists, mining engineers and consultants, as well as developing scopes of work, managing budgets and reviewing deliverables of studies. Mr. Francis’ specific mining and business experience and qualifications led the Board to conclude that Mr. Francis should serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Wm. Chris Mathers – Mr. Mathers is a senior finance and accounting professional with more than 40 years of experience in financial accounting, mergers and acquisition, Securities and Exchange Commission compliance and operational and administrative support. Mr. Mathers holds a BBA in Accounting from Southwestern University at Georgetown, Texas, and is a certified public accountant. Mr. Mathers began his career in public accounting in 1981 with the accounting firm of Price Waterhouse focusing on multi-national public audits. From 1983 through 1989, Mr. Mathers was in private practice focusing on tax preparation, and the financial audits of corporations, partnerships and individuals. From 1989 through 1993, Mr. Mathers was a Controller and Administrative Officer of GJR Investments, Inc., a national real estate firm.

Beginning in 1994, Mr. Mathers began work as chief financial officer for several privately and publicly held companies, including: InterSystems, Inc. of Houston, Texas, a multi-state manufacturing firm; Nexus Custom Electronics, Inc., a manufacturer of circuit boards to private industry and the U.S. Department of Defense; Interactive Nutrition International, Inc., Ottawa, Canada, a manufacturer of Nutritional products.

Arrangements between Officers and Directors

To our knowledge, there is no arrangement or understanding between any of our directors and executive officers andwith any other person, including directors and executive officers, pursuant to which the director or officer was selected to serve as an officer.in such position.

Family Relationships

None of our Directorsdirectors or executive officers are related by blood, marriage, or adoption to any other Director,director or executive officer, or other key employees.officer.

Other Directorships

Except as listed below, noNo directors of the Company are also directors of issuers with a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the United StatesSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) (or which otherwise are required to file periodic reports under the Exchange Act).

Anthony Marchese                   GeoTech Solutions, Inc.

Legal Proceedings

No director or officer of the Company is a party adverse to the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or has a material interest adverse to the Company or any of its subsidiaries.  During the past ten years, no director or executive officer of the Company has:

(a)filed or has had filed against such person, a petition under the U.S. federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law, nor has a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer been appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which such person was a general partner, at or within two years before the time of filing, or any corporation or business association of which such person was an executive officer, at or within two years before such filings;

77 

(b)     been convicted or pleaded guilty ornolo contenderein a criminal proceeding or is a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offences);

(c)        been the subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting such person’s activities in any type of business, securities, trading, commodity or banking activities;

(d)       been the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any U.S. federal or state authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any type of business, securities, trading, commodity or banking activities, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;

(e)been found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), or by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a U.S. federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated;
(f)      been the subject of, or a party to, any U.S. federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of: (i) any U.S. federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation; or (ii) any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or (iii) any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

(g)    been the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C.78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the U.S.Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C.1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board of Directors Structure

The Company’s current bylaws require the Board to consist of one or more directors, the number of directors to be determined from time to time by resolution of the stockholders or by resolution of the Board. The current Board is composed of fivesix directors.

Director Independence

The Company currently has fourdirectors as of December 11, 2017, including fourfive independent directors, as defined by the OTC Markets Group OTCQB independence standards, as follows:

Anthony Marchese
Cecil Wall
Nicholas PingitorePeter Denetclaw


James R WolfeLaVern Lund
Kevin Francis

 

An “independent” director is a director whom the Board has determined satisfies the requirements for independence under Section 803A of the NYSE MKT Company Guide.

78 

Meetings of the Board and Board Member Attendance at Annual Meeting

During the fiscal year ending August 31, 2017,2023, the Board held two (2)four (4) meetings of the Board. None of the incumbent Directors attended fewer than 75% of the board meetings which occurred during their tenure on the Board.

Board members are not required to attend the Annual Meeting.

We did not hold an annual meeting of the shareholders during the year ended August 31, 2017.

79 

Communications to the Board

Stockholders who are interested in communicating directly with members of the Board, or the Board as a group, may do so by writing directly to the individual Board member c/o Corporate Secretary, at 1124 24thP.O. Box 159, 539 El Paso Street, Galveston,Sierra Blanca, Texas 77550.79851. The Company’s Secretary will forward communications directly to the appropriate Board member. If the correspondence is not addressed to the particular member, the communication will be forwarded to a Board member to bring to the attention of the Board. The Company’s Secretary will review all communications before forwarding them to the appropriate Board member.

Board Committees

The Board has established three board committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.

The information below sets out the current members of each of the Company’s board committees and summarizes the functions of each of the committees in accordance with their mandates.

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Experts

The Company has a standing Audit Committee and audit committee charter, which complies with Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the requirements of the NYSE MKT.Act. The Audit Committee was established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee is currently comprised of three (3) directors, all of whom, in the opinion of the Board, are independent (in accordance with Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act and the requirements of Section 803A the NYSE MKT Company Guide) and financially literate (pursuant to the requirements of Section 803B of the NYSE MKT Company Guide):OTC Markets Group, Inc. OTCQB independence standards), being Anthony Marchese (Chairman), LaVern Lund (appointed on November 25, 2023) and Cecil Wall and Nicholas Pingitore.Wall. Mr. Marchese is a “financial expert” as defined under Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K and meets the requirements for financial sophistication under the requirements of Section 803B of the NYSE MKT Company Guide.S-K.

The Audit Committee is responsible for the oversight of the Company’s accounting and financial reporting processes. This includes the selection and engagement of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and review of the scope of the annual audit, audit fees and results of the audit.

The Audit Committee meets with our management and our external auditors to review matters affecting financial reporting, the system of internal accounting and financial controls and procedures and the audit procedures and audit plans. The Audit Committee reviews our significant financial risks, is involved in the appointment of senior financial executives and annually reviews our insurance coverage and any off-balance sheet transactions.

The Audit Committee monitors the Company’s audit and the preparation of financial statements and all financial disclosure contained in the Company’s SEC filings. The Audit Committee appoints the Company’s external auditors, monitors their qualifications and independence and determines the appropriate level of their remuneration. The external auditors report directly to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has the authority to terminate the Company’s external auditors’ engagement and approve in advance any services to be provided by the external auditors that are not related to the audit.

During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2017,A copy of the Audit Committee did not meet.charter is available for review on the Company’s website at www.TMRC.com.

Audit Committee Report

The Company’s Audit Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. The Committee has three (3) members, each of whom is “independent” as determined under Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act and the rules of the NYSE MKT. The Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board.

The Committee assists the Board by overseeing the (1) integrity of the Company’s financial reporting and internal control, (2) independence and performance of the Company’s independent auditors, (3) and provides an avenue of communication between management, the independent auditors and the Board.

80 

In the course of providing its oversight responsibilities regarding the audited annual financial statements for the year ended August 31, 2017,2023, the Committee reviewed the audited annual financial statements for the year ended August 31, 20172023 with management and the Company’s independent auditors. The Committee reviewed accounting principles, practices, and judgments as well as the adequacy and clarity of the notes to the financial statements.

81 

The Committee reviewed the independence and performance of the independent auditors who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and such other matters as required to be communicated by the independent auditors in accordance with Statement of Auditing Standards 61, as superseded by Statement of Auditing Standard 114 –No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees, issued by the Auditor’s Communication With Those Charged With Governance, as modified or supplemented.Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). 

60

 

The Committee meets with the independent auditors to discuss their audit plans, scope and timing on a regular basis, with or without management present. The Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board for independent auditor communications with Audit Committees concerning independence, as may be modified or supplemented.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report to the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2017.2023. The Committee and the Board have also recommended the selection of LBBHam, Langston & Associates Ltd., LLPBrezina, L.L.P. as independent auditors for the Company for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2017.2023.

Submitted by the Audit Committee Members

Anthony Marchese (Chairman)
Nicolas Pingitore
Cecil Wall

Compensation Committee

The Company has a Compensation Committee comprised of three (3) directors, each of whom, in the opinion of the Board, are independent (under Section 803A of(as determined under the NYSE MKT Company Guide)OTC Markets Group OTCQB independence standards): Cecil Wall (Chairman), James WolfeKevin Francis and Anthony Marchese.

The Compensation Committee charter that complies with the requirements of the NYSE MKT.has adopted a charter. The Compensation Committee is responsible for considering and authorizing terms of employment and compensation of executive officers and providing advice on compensation structures in the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer may not be present during the voting determination or deliberations of his or her compensation; however, the Compensation Committee does consult with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer in determining and recommending the compensation of directors and other executive officers.

In addition, the Company’s Compensation Committee reviews both our overall salary objectives and significant modifications made to employee benefit plans, including those applicable to executive officers, and proposes awards of stock options. The Compensation Committee has determined that the Company’s compensation policies and practices for its employees generally, not just executive officers, are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The Compensation Committee does not and cannot delegate its authority to determine director and executive officer compensation. Our Compensation Committee and management did not engage the services of an external compensation consultant during fiscal year 2017.2023.

During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2017, the Compensation Committee did not meet. A copy of the Compensation Committee charter is available for review on the Company’s website at www.TMRC.com.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

There are no Compensation Committee or Board interlocks among the members of the Company’s Board.

82 

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

General

The Company has a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee composed of 2 directors, James Wolfe and Nicholas Pingitore. It is the opinion of the Board that these1 director, Anthony Marchese, with two individuals are independent (under Section 803A of the NYSE MKT Company Guide).vacancies.

The Company’s Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are responsible for developing the Company’s approach to corporate governance issues. The Committee evaluates the qualifications of potential candidates for director and recommends to the Board nominees for election at the next annual meeting or any special meeting of stockholders, and any person to be considered to fill a Board vacancy resulting from death, disability, removal, resignation or an increase in Board size. The Committee has not adopted a formal policy which sets forth the criteria the Board will assess in connection with the consideration of a candidate. Instead the Committee considers a multitude of qualifications and characteristics, including the candidate’s integrity, reputation, judgment, knowledge, independence, experience, accomplishments, commitment and skills, all in the context of an assessment of the perceived needs of the Board at that time.

During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2017, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee did not meet. A copy of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee charter is available on the Company’s website atwww.TMRC.com.

61

 

Board Diversity

The Company does not have a formal policy regarding diversity in the selection of nominees for directors. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee does, however, consider diversity on an informal basis as part of its overall selection strategy.  In considering diversity of the Board as a criteria for selecting nominees, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee takes into account various factors and perspectives, including differences of viewpoint, professional experience, education, skills and other individual qualities and attributes that contribute to Board heterogeneity, as well as race, gender and national origin. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee seeks persons with leadership experience in a variety of contexts. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee believes that this conceptualization of diversity is the most effective means to implement Board diversity. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will assess the effectiveness of this approach as part of its annual review of its charter.

Recommendations to the Board

The Committee will consider recommendations for director nominees made by stockholders and others if these individuals meet the criteria for consideration. For consideration by the Committee, the nominating stockholder or other person must provide the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s principal offices with information about the nominee, including the detailed background of the suggested candidate that will demonstrate how the individual meets the Company’s director nomination criteria. If a candidate proposed by a stockholder meets the criteria, the individual will be considered on the same basis as other candidates.

Board Leadership Structure

The Board has reviewed the Company’s current Board leadership structure in light of the composition of the Board, the Company’s size, the nature of the Company’s business, the regulatory framework under which the Company operates, the Company’s stockholder base, the Company’s peer group and other relevant factors. Considering these factors the Board has determined to have a separate Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. The Chairman of the Board is a non-executive position. The Board has determined that this structure is currently the most appropriate Board leadership structure for the Company.  The Board noted the following factors in reaching its determination:

The Board acts efficiently and effectively under its current structure.

83 

A structure of a separate Chief Executive Officer and non-executive Chairman of the Board puts the Company in the best position efficiently handle major issues facing the Company on a day-to-day and long-term basis, and still ensure that the Board is in the best position to have an independent director identify key risks and developments facing the Company and have those risks and developments brought promptly to the Board’s attention.
This structure eliminates the potential for confusion and duplication of efforts at the highest executive level.
Companies within the Company’s peer group utilize similar Board structures.

84 

The Company’s non-executive Chairman of the Board acts as a lead independent director.  Given the size of the Board, the Board believes that having a non-executive Chairman of the Board combined with the presence of three other independent directors out of the five directors on the Board and independent directors sitting on all of the Board’s committees is sufficient independent oversight of the Chief Executive Officer.  The independent directors work well together in the current board structure and the Board does not believe that selecting a lead independent director outside of the non-executive Chairman of the Board would add significant benefits to the Board’s oversight role.

The Board of Director’s Role in Risk Management Oversight

The understanding, identification and management of risk are essential elements for the successful management of the Company. Risk oversight begins with the Board and the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee consists of Anthony Marchese, Nicolas Pingitore and Cecil Wall, each an independent director.

The Audit Committee reviews and discusses policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. The Audit Committee also has oversight responsibility with respect to the integrity of the Company’s financial reporting process and systems of internal control regarding finance and accounting, as well as its financial statements.

At the management level, an internal audit provides reliable and timely information to the Board and management regarding the Company’s effectiveness in identifying and appropriately controlling risks. Annually, management presents to the Audit Committee a report summarizing the review of the Company’s methods for identifying and managing risks.

Additionally, the Company’s Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews the risks related to succession planning and the independence of the Board.  The Compensation Committee reviews the risks related to the Company’s various compensation plans.

In the event that a committee is allocated responsibility for examining and analyzing a specific risk, such committee reports on the relevant risk exposure during its regular reports to the entire Board to facilitate proper risk oversight by the entire Board.

Based on a review of the nature of operations, the Board does not believe that any areas of the Company have incentive to take excessive risks that would likely have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations.

Code of Business and Ethical Conduct

The Company has adopted a corporate Code of Business and Ethical Conduct administered by its President and Chief Executive Officer, Daniel Gorski. The Company believes its Code of Business and Ethical Conduct is reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and promote honest and ethical conduct, to provide full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in public reports, to comply with applicable laws, to ensure prompt internal reporting of code violations, and to provide accountability for adherence to the code. The Company’s Code of Business and Ethical Conduct provides written standards that are reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:

Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

Full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that are filed with, or submitted to, the Commission and in other public communications made by an issuer;

Compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations; and

The prompt internal reporting of violations of the code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the code; and

Accountability for adherence to the code.

The Company’s Code of Business and Ethical Conduct is available on our web site at www.TMRC.com. A copy of the Code of Business and Ethical Conduct will be provided to any person without charge upon written request to the Company at its executive offices. We intend to disclose any waiver from a provision of the Code of Business and Ethical Conduct that applies to any of the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions that relates to any element of the Company’s Code of Business and Ethical Conduct on the Company’s website. No waivers were granted from the requirements of the Code of Business and Ethical Conduct during the year ended August 31, 2023, or during the subsequent period thereto. 

62

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following summary compensation tables set forth information concerning the annual and long-term compensation for services in all capacities to the Company for the years stated for those persons who were, at August 31, 20172023 named executive officers. ”Named“Named Executive Officer” means: (a) each Chief Executive Officer,principal executive officer, (b) each Chief Financial Officer, (c) each of the threetwo most highly compensated executive officers or the three most highly compensated individuals acting in a similar capacity, other than the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,principal executive officer, at the end of the most recently completed financial year; and (d) each individual(c) up to two additional individuals who would be an NEONamed Executive Officer under paragraph (c)(b) but for the fact that the individual was neithernot serving as an executive officer of the Company nor acting in a similar capacity, at the end of that financial year. There are only two Named Executive Officers, each of which is listed below.

Summary Compensation Table

Name and principal position

(a)

 

Year

(b)

 

Salary

(US$)

(c)

  

Option

Awards

(US$)

(f)

  

All Other

Compensation

(US$)

(i) 

  

Total

compensation

(US$)

(j)

 
   Option All Other Total 
 Salary Awards Compensation Compensation 
Name and principal position Year (US$) (US$) (US$) (US$) 
Daniel Gorski 2017 $120,000  $0  $0  $120,000  2023 $120,000 $ $ $120,000 
 2016 $120,000  $0 $0  $120,000 
Chief Executive Officer 2015 $120,000  $55,000(1)(2) $0  $175,000  2022 $120,000 $ $ $120,000 
                           
Wm Chris Mathers 2017 $60,000  $0  $0  $60,000  2023 $60,000 $ $ $60,000 
Chief Financial Officer 2016 $60,000  $0  $0  $60,000  2022 $60,000 $ $ $60,000 

 

In August 2012, the Company agreed to pay to Mr. Daniel Gorski the amount of $120,000 annually in connection with his appointment as Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The Company and Mr. Gorski have not entered into a formal written employment agreement in relation to Mr. Gorski’s compensation and employment terms as Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Gorski is currently being paid $120,000 per year. Mr. Mathers is currently being paid $60,000 per year pursuant to an at-will employment arrangement. The Company does not believe that its compensation arrangements with its Named Executive Officers creates inherent risks that may have a material adverse effect on the Company.

85 

There is no pay ratio disclosure as there are only two employees, the principal executive officer and chief financial officer, who comprise the Named Executive Officers.

(1)  On December 8, 2013, our Board approved and granted 60,000 options Mr. Gorski. These options were originally exercisable at $0.50 per share for a period of ten years, vesting immediately and at a fair value of $30,000 using the Black-Sholes pricing model. On March 3, 2014, our Board approved the repricing of these 60,000 options to $0.45.  With respect to the repricing of these options, the Black-Scholes pricing model was used to estimate the fair value of the 60,000 options, using the assumptions of a risk free interest rate of 0.39%, a dividend yield of 0%, volatility of 290% and an expected life of 9.75 years. The options were expensed in full during the third quarter 2014 in the amount of approximately $26,400.
(2)  On February 19, 2015, our Board approved and granted 250,000 options to Mr. Gorski. These options are exercisable at $0.22 per share for a period of ten years, vesting immediately and at a fair value of $55,000 using the Black-Sholes pricing model. With respect to these options, the Black-Scholes pricing model was used to estimate the fair value of the 250,000 options, using the assumptions of a risk free interest rate of 0.39%, a dividend yield of 0%, volatility of 268% and an expected life of 10 years.

As required under SEC rules adopted pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive compensation and certain measurements of the Company’s performance.

The following table sets forth the information of our NEOs, consisting of the Company’s primary executive officer (“PEO”) and primary financial officer (“PFO”) for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2023 and 2022. The amounts represented under “compensation actually paid” (“CAP”) were computed in accordance with SEC rules relative to Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K.

Pay Versus Performance Table

Year  Summary compensation table total for first PEO (1)  Summary compensation table total for second PEO (2)  Compensation actually paid to first PEO  Compensation actually paid to second PEO  Average summary compensation table total for non-PEO NEOs (3)  Average compensation actually paid to non-PEO and NEOs (3)  Value of initial fixed $100 investment based on total shareholder return  

Net income 

(Loss)

 
8/31/2022  $120,000  $60,000  $120,000  $60,000  $  $  $142.03  $(2,903,739)
8/31/2023  $120,000  $60,000  $120,000  $60,000  $  $  $40.31  $(2,591,961)

 

(1) Represents amounts actually paid to our CEO Daniel E Gorski 

(2) Represents amounts actually paid to our CFO Wm Chris Mathers 

(3) No non-PEO NEOs were paid by the Company

86 


Executive Compensation Agreements and Summary of Executive Compensation

Report on Executive Compensation

During the year ended August 31, 2017,2023, the Board and the Company’s Compensation Committee waswere responsible for establishing a compensation policy and administering the compensation programs of the Company’s executive officers.

Salary

The amount of compensation paid by the Company to each of the Company’s officers and the terms of those persons’ employment is determined by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee evaluates past performance and considers future incentive and retention in considering the appropriate compensation for the Company’s officers. The Company believes that the compensation paid to the Company’s directors and officers is fair to the Company.

Stock Incentive Awards

The Compensation Committee believes that the use of direct stock awards is at times appropriate for employees, and in the future intends tomay use direct stock awards to reward outstanding service or to attract and retain individuals with exceptional talent and credentials. The use of stock options and other awards is intended to strengthen the alignment of interests of executive officers and other key employees with those of our stockholders.

 In this regard, during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2017, Compensation Committee and the Board did not authorize the issuance of stock option awards to named executive officers.  

Executive Compensation Agreements

Agreement with Mr. Gorski

On August 16, 2012, theThe Company agreed to paypays Mr. Daniel Gorski a salary in the amount of $120,000 annually in connection with his appointment as Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The Company and Mr. Gorski have not entered into a formal written employment agreementagreement. 

Agreement with Wm. Chris Mathers

The Company pays Mr. Wm. Chris Mathers a salary in relation to Mr. Gorski’s compensation and employment termsthe amount of $60,000 annually in connection with his appointment as Chief Executive Officer.Financial Officer of the Company. The Company and Mr. Mathers have not entered into a formal written employment agreement.

Outstanding Equity Awards At Fiscal Year-End

There were 5,755,000no awarded stock options fully vested andpreviously issued to Named Executive Officers that were outstanding as of August 31, 2017.2023.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

The Company does not offer nonqualified deferred compensation to any of its named executive officers.

87 

Director Compensation

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth the compensation granted to our directors during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2017.  Compensation2023. No cash director fees are paid and this has been the Company’s policy for more than the last two fiscal years. All director fees for services rendered are paid through the issuance of shares of Company Common Stock or through non-qualified options to directors that are also named executive officerspurchase shares of Company Common Stock. No director compensation is detailed above and is not included on this table.paid to Mr. Gorski.

Name 

Fees Paid or

Earned in Cash

($)

  

Fee Paid or Earned in Stock

($)

  

Option

Awards

($)

  

Total

($)

 
(a)  (b)   (c)   (d)   (h) 
Anthony Marchese $25,000  $0  $0  $25,000 
Cecil Wall $14,000  $0  $0  $14,000 
Nicholas Pingitore $10,000  $0  $0  $10,000 
James Wolfe $10,000  $0  $0  $10,000 
Laura Lynch $8,167  $0  $0  $8,167 
  Fees Paid or  Fee Paid or       
  Earned in  Earned in  Option    
  Cash  Stock  Awards  Total 
Name ($)  ($)  ($)  ($) 
Anthony Marchese $  $55,000(1) $637,548(2)$692,548 
Cecil Wall $  $25,000(1) $  $25,000 
Peter Denetclaw, Jr. $  $25,000(1) $  $25,000 
LaVern Lund $  $25,000(1) $  $25,000 
Kevin Francis $  $33,000(1) $  $33,000 

Compensation of Directors

The Company has agreed to pay its directors $10,000 annually, $1,000 for in person board meetings, $500 for telephonic board meetings and $500 for committee meetings (both in person and telephonic).  Independent directors will be offered the option to elect to receive any cash compensation as restricted stock at a 20% discount(1) This value calculation equates to the closing pricemarket value of our Common Stock on the date of grant.  grant of shares of Common Stock issued for director services rendered, less a 20% discount. 

(2) During the year ended August 31, 2023, the Company granted Mr. Marchese a five-year non-qualified option to purchase 500,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $1.31 per share, with a Black-Scholes option pricing model valuation of $637,548 on the date of grant, for services rendered as chairman of the board of directors.

Each of our directors are reimbursed reasonable out of pocket expenses associated with attending our board meetings.

64

 

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

The following tables set forth information as of December 4, 2017,November 21, 2023, regarding the ownership of the Company’s common stock by: (i) each named officer,Named Executive Officer, each director and all of the Company’s directors and executive officers as a group; and (ii) each person who is known by us to own more than 5% of the Company’s shares of common stock. The number of shares beneficially owned and the percentage of shares beneficially owned are based on 44,941,53273,784,810 shares of common stock outstanding as of December 11, 2017.November 21, 2023.

 

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days following December 11, 2017November 21, 2023 are deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned by the optionee for the purpose of computing share and percentage ownership of that optionee but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table, and as affected by applicable community property laws, all persons listed have sole voting and investment power for all shares shown as beneficially owned by them.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner 

Number of 

Shares of 

Common Stock 

Beneficially 

Owned  

  

Percent of 

Class 

Beneficially 

Owned 

 
Daniel E. Gorski  7,006,423(1)   9.5%
Anthony Marchese  6,637,814(2)   8.9%
Cecil Wall  1,885,265(3)   2.6%
Wm Chris Mathers  488,454(4)   * 
Peter Denetclaw, Jr.  10,169,464(5)   13.8%
LaVern Lund  10,146,744(6)   13.8%
Kevin Francis  64,217(7)   * 
All directors and executive officers as a group (7 persons)  26,350,715   35.5%
Navajo Transitional Energy Company  10,111,883(8)   13.7%

 

88 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner 

Number of
Shares

of
Common
Stock

Beneficially
Owned

  

Percent of
Class

Beneficially
Owned 

 
G.W. McDonald  5,066,750   11.3%
Daniel E. Gorski  5,873,640(1)  12.9%
Anthony Marchese  2,327,500(2)  5.0%
Cecil Wall  899,923(3)  2.0%
Nicholas Pingitore  978,940(4)  2.1%
James Wolfe  690,000(5)  1.5%
Laura Lynch  212,000(6)  * 
Wm Chris Mathers     * 
All directors and executive officers as a group (7 persons)  10,982,003   36.9%
John C Tumazos  2,513,597(7)  5.7%
SC Fundamental Value Fund LP  10,557,900(8)  21.0%

* Less than 1%.

 

(1)

Represents 5,200,0007,006,423 shares of common stock, (i) 60,000 shares of common stock acquirable upon exercise of a 10 year option at an exercise price of $0.50 per share,, (ii) 250,000 shares of common stock acquirable upon exercise of a 10 year option at an exercise price of $0.22 per share, and (iii) 363,640 shares of common stock acquirable upon exercise of 5 year warrants at an exercise price of $0.35 per share. Common Stock.
  
(2)RepresentsConsists of (i) the following securities registered in the name4,113,774 shares of Mr. Marchese (a) 435,000Common Stock owned individually, (ii) 2,024,040 shares of common stock (b) a 3.5 year option to purchase up to 45,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.45 per share, (c) a ten year option to purchase up to 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.45 per share (d) a five year option to purchase up to 150,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.45 (e) a five year option to purchase up to 175,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.45, (f) a five year option to purchase up to 250,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.45, (g) a five year option to purchase up to 225,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.45 and (h) a ten year option to purchase up to 240,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.45; (i) two five year warrants to purchase up to 145,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.35; (j ) a ten year option to purchase up to 250,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.22  and (ii) the following securities registered in the name of the Insiders Trend Fund, LP., an entity in which Mr. Marchese serves as general partner and chief investment officer: 312,500officer and (iii) 500,000 shares of common stock. stock underlying a currently exercisable option.
  
(3)Consists of (i) 599,92326,732 shares of common stock,Common Stock owned by Cecil Wall individually and (ii) a five year option to purchase up to 90,0001,858,533 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.45; (iii) a ten year option to purchase up to 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.45; (iv) a ten year option to purchase up to 60,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.45; and (v) a ten year option to purchase up to 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.22.Common Stock owned by various trusts controlled by Mr. Wall.
  
(4)ConsistsComprised of 488,454 shares of Common Stock. 
(5)Comprised of (i) 193,94057,581 shares of common stock;Common Stock owned individually and (ii) a ten year option to purchase up to 100,00010,111,883 shares of common stock at an exercise priceowned by Navajo Transitional Energy Company, of $0.45, (iii)which Mr. Denetclaw is deemed to be a five year option to purchase up to 250,000beneficial owner.
(6)Comprised of (i) 34,861, shares of Common Stock owned individually and (ii) 10,111,883 shares of common stock at an exercise priceowned by Navajo Transitional Energy Company, of $0.45, (iv)which Mr. Lund is deemed to be a five year option to purchase up to 225,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.45;(v) a ten year option to purchase up to 160,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.45, and (vi) two five year warrants to purchase up to 70,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.35, (v) a ten year option to purchase up to 160,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.45, (vi) two five year warrants to purchase up to 76,944 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.35, and (vii) ) a ten year option to purchase up to 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.22.beneficial owner.

 

89 

(5)  (7)ConsistsComprised of 5,00064,217 shares of common stock and (i) a ten year option to purchase up to 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.45, (ii) a five year option to purchase up to 250,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.45, (iii) a five year option to purchase up to 225,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.45; and (iv) a ten year option to purchase up to 60,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.45; and (v) a ten year option to purchase up to 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.22. Common Stock

90 

 

(6)  (8)Consists of 2,000 shares of common stockMessrs. Denetclaw and (i) a ten year optionLund have voting and investment power with respect to purchase up to 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.45 and (ii) a ten year option to purchase up to 60,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.45; and (iii) a ten year option to purchase up to 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.22. 
(7)Includes 1,889,597 shares of common stock, 149,000 shares of common stock underlying warrants and 475,000 Shares underlying options that are currently exercisable.
(8)Represents shares held by related persons and entities SC Fundamental Value Fund, L.P., SC Fundamental LLC, Peter M. Collery, Neil H. Koffler, John T. Bird, David Hurwitz and SC Fundamental LLC Employee Savings & Profit Sharing Plan. Represents (i) 5,181,276 shares of common stock, (ii) 3,500,000 common stock purchase warrants exercisable at $0.20 per share for a period of five years, (iii) 938,312 Class A Warrant exercisable at $0.35 per share for a period of five years and (v) 938,312 Class B Warrants exercisable at $0.50 per share for a period of five years.these shares.

It is believed by the Company that all persons named have full voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated, unless otherwise noted in the table and the footnotes thereto. Under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, a person (or group of persons) is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if he or she, directly or indirectly, has or shares the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. Accordingly, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any security, which that person has the right to acquire within 60 days, such as options or warrants to purchase our common stock.

 


The Company is not, to the best of our knowledge, directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation or foreign government.

 

Change in Control

 

The Company is not aware of any arrangement that might result in a change in control in the future. The Company has no knowledge of any arrangements, including any pledge by any person of our securities, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in the Company’s control.

 

OTHER GOVERNANCE MATTERS

Code of Business and Ethical Conduct

The Company has adopted a corporate Code of Business and Ethical Conduct administered by its President and Chief Executive Officer, Daniel Gorski. The Company believes its Code of Business and Ethical Conduct is reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and promote honest and ethical conduct, to provide full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in public reports, to comply with applicable laws, to ensure prompt internal reporting of code violations, and to provide accountability for adherence to the code. The Company’s Code of Business and Ethical Conduct provides written standards that are reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:

Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;
Full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that are filed with, or submitted to, the Commission and in other public communications made by an issuer;
Compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations; and
The prompt internal reporting of violations of the code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the code; and
Accountability for adherence to the code.

91 

The Company’s Code of Business and Ethical Conduct is available on its web site at www.TMRC.com.  A copy of the Code of Business and Ethical Conduct will be provided to any person without charge upon written request to the Company at its executive offices: 516 S. Spring Avenue, Tyler, Texas 75702.  We intend to disclose any waiver from a provision of the Code of Business and Ethical Conduct that applies to any of the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions that relates to any element of the Company’s Code of Business and Ethical Conduct on the Company’s website. No waivers were granted from the requirements of the Code of Business and Ethical Conduct during the year ended August 31, 2017, or during the subsequent period to the date of this Proxy Statement.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting ComplianceCompliance; Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

 

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Company’s officers, directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Company’s common stock, (“10% Stockholders”), to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Such officers, directors and 10% Stockholders are also required by SEC rules to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms that they file.SEC.

 

Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, or written representations from certain reporting persons, the Company believes that during fiscal year ended August 31, 20172023 the filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and greater than 10% percent beneficial owners were complied with.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

In September 2008, the Board adopted our 2008 Stock Option Plan (the “2008 Plan”), whichwith, except for : (i) Mr. Lund was also approved by our shareholders in September 2008.  In May 2011, the board of directors adopted an amendment to our 2008 Plan (the “Amended 2008 Plan”), which was also approved by our shareholders in August 2011. The Amended 2008 Plan increased the number of shares available for grant from 2,000,000 to up to 5,000,000issued 6,546 shares of our common stock for awardsthe Company’s Common Stock on October 18, 2022 and December 28, 2022, respectively, as a director and failed to our officers, directors, employees and consultants.  On February 15, 2012, our stockholders approved an increase of 2,000,000 oftimely file a Form 4; (ii) Mr. Lund was issued 11,336 shares of common stock available for issuance under the amended 2008Company’s Common Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”).  As amended, the Plan provides for 7,000,000on March 31, 2023 and April 10, 2023, respectively, as a director and failed to timely file a Form 4; (iii) Mr. Denetclaw was issued 57,581 shares of common stock for all awards.  On February 24, 2016, the stockholdersCompany’s Common Stock on dates between October 27, 2020 and October 9, 2023 as a director and failed to timely file a Form 4; (iv) Mr. Wall was issued 3,313 shares of the Company approved an amendmentCompany’s Common Stock on October 18, 2022 and December 28, 2022, respectively, as a director and failed to timely file a Form 4; (v) Mr. Francis was issued 4,526 and 4,638 shares of the Company’s 2008Common Stock Option Plan, pursuanton October 18, 2022 and December 28, 2022, respectively, as a director and failed to which the number of shares available under the plantimely file a Form 4; (vi) Mr. Francis was increase from 7,000,000 to 9,000,000issued 7,557 shares of common stock. Other provisionsthe Company’s Common Stock on March 31, 2023 as a director and failed to timely file a Form 4; (vii) Mr. Francis was issued 2,476 shares of the Amended 2008 Plan remain the sameCompany’s Common Stock on June 22, 2023 as under our 2008 Plan.  As of August 31, 2017, a total of 3,780,000director and failed to timely file a Form 4; and (viii) Mr. Marchese was issued 8,082 and 8,282 shares of our common stock remained available for future grants under the Amended 2008 Plan.

The following table sets forth certain informationCompany’s Common Stock on October 18, 2022 and December 28, 2022, respectively, as of August 31, 2017 concerning our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options or warrants or pursuanta director and failed to purchases of stock under the Amended 2008 Plan:timely file a Form 4.

 Plan Category 

(a)

Number of

Securities to be

Issued Upon the

Exercise of

Outstanding

Options

  

(b)
Weighted-

Average Exercise

Price of

Outstanding

Options

  

(c)

Available for 

Future Issuance 

Under Equity

Compensation

Plans (Excluding 

Securities

Reflected in

Column (a))

 
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders  5,220,000  $0.63   3,780,000 
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders  535,000   0.31    
Total  5,755,000  $0.47   3,780,000 

92 

 

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2017 we had advances from certain Officers and Directors totaling $169,665.

Except as indicated herein, no officer, director, promoter, or affiliate of the Company has or proposes to have any direct or indirect material interest in any asset acquired or proposed to be acquired by the Company through security holdings, contracts, options, or otherwise.  

Policy for Review of Related Party Transactions

 

The Company has a policy for the review of transactions with related persons as set forth in the Company’s Audit Committee Charter and internal practices. The policy requires review, approval or ratification of all transactions in which the Company is a participant and in which any of the Company’s directors, executive officers, significant stockholders or an immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons has a direct or indirect material interest, subject to certain categories of transactions that are deemed to be pre-approved under the policy - including employment of executive officers, director compensation (in general, where such transactions are required to be reported in the Company’s proxy statement pursuant to SEC compensation disclosure requirements), as well as certain transactions where the amounts involved do not exceed specified thresholds.  All related party transactions must be reported for review by the Audit Committee pursuant to the Audit Committee’s charter and the rules of the NYSE MKT.   

Following its review, the Audit Committee determines whether these transactions are in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, taking into consideration whether they are on terms no less favorable to the Company than those available with other parties and the related person’s interest in the transaction. If a related party transaction is to be ongoing, the Audit Committee may establish guidelines for the Company’s management to follow in its ongoing dealings with the related person.

Our policy for review of transactions with related persons was followed in all of the transactions set forth above and all such transactions were reviewed and approved in accordance with our policy for review of transactions with related persons.   

 Director Independence

Our board of directors has determined that four of five of our present board members are “independent directors” as defined by Rule 4200(a)(15) of the Rules of Nasdaq Marketplace Rules.

  

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

LBB & Associates Ltd., LLP was the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Company in the fiscal year ended August 31, 2017.

The Company’s financial statements have been audited by LBB & Associates Ltd., LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, for the years ended August 31, 2016 and 2017.

93 

 

The following table sets forth information regarding the amount billed to us by our independent auditor, LBBHam, Langston & Associates Ltd.Brezina, L.L.P., LLP for our two fiscal years ended August 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, respectively:

 

 Years Ended August 31,  Years Ended August 31, 
 2017 2016  2023 2022 
Audit Fees $37,500 $38,950  $79,000 $66,855 
     
Audit Related Fees $0.00 $0.00    
     
Tax Fees $0.00 $0.00  5,000 5,000 
     
All Other Fees $0.00 $0.00      
          
Total $37,500 $38,950  $84,000 $71,855 

 

94 

Audit Fees

 

Consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our financial statements and review of interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports and services that are normally provided by the principal accountants in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

 


Audit Related Fees

 

ConsistThere were no “Audit Related Fees” charged which would have consisted of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees”.

 

Tax Fees

 

Consist of fees billed for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. These services include preparation of federal and state income tax returns.

 

All Other Fees

 

ConsistThere were no “All Other Fees” which would have consisted of fees for product and services other than the services reported above.

 

Policy on Pre-Approval by Audit Committee of Services Performed by Independent Auditors

 

The Audit Committee has adopted procedures requiring the Audit Committee to review and approve in advance, all particular engagements for services provided by the Company’s independent auditor. Consistent with applicable laws, the procedures permit limited amounts of services, other than audit, review or attest services, to be approved by one or more members of the Audit Committee pursuant to authority delegated by the Audit Committee, provided the Audit Committee is informed of each particular service. All of the engagements and fees for 20172023 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews with LBBHam, Langston & Associates Ltd.Brezina, L.L.P., LLP whether the non-audit services to be provided are compatible with maintaining the auditor’s independence.

 

67 

95 

 

PART IV

 

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES

 

Documents filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or incorporated by reference:

 

(1)(1)The financial statements are listed on the “Index to Financial Statements” in Item 8.

 
(2)Financial Statement Schedules (omitted because the Company is a smaller reporting issuer).

The following exhibits are attached hereto or are incorporated by reference:

 

Exhibit
No.
 Description
2.1 
2.1Plan of Conversion, dated August 24, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 29, 2012.
3.1 
3.1Delaware Certificate of Conversion, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 29, 2012.
3.2 
3.2Delaware Certificate of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 29, 2012.
3.3 
3.3Delaware Certificate of Amendment, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 18, 2016
3.4Delaware Bylaws, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 29, 2012.
4.1 
3.5Common Stock, par value $0.01; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 72,869,220 shares issued and outstanding as of August 31, 2022.
4.1Form of Common Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on February 8, 2011.
4.2 
4.2Form of Rights Certificate,Warrant Indenture, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of our Form S-1/A filed with the SEC on December 10, 2014.
4.3 Form of Warrant Indenture, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of our Form S-1/A filed with the SEC on December 10, 2014.
4.44.3 Form of Class A Warrant, included as Schedule A in Exhibit 4.3.4.2.
4.5 
4.4Form of Class B Warrant, included as Schedule B in Exhibit 4.3.4.2.
4.6 Form of Promissory Note dated August 26, 2015.
4.710.1 Form of Warrant dated August 26, 2015.
10.1Amended and Restated 2008 Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2011 filed with the SEC on July 15, 2011.
10.2 
10.2Mining Lease, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on February 8, 2011.
10.3 Form
10.3Mining Lease dated November 2011 with the State of Class A Warrant,Texas, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of ourthe Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 20092019 filed with the SEC on February 8, 2011.November 27, 2019.
10.4 Form
10.4Purchase option agreement dated September 2014 with the State of Class B Warrant,Texas, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of ourthe Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 20092019 filed with the SEC on February 8, 2011.November 27, 2019.
10.5 Form
10.5Groundwater lease dated September 2014 with the State of Registration Rights Agreement,Texas, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of ourthe Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 20092019 filed with the SEC on February 8, 2011.November 27, 2019.
10.6* 
10.6ReeTech Operating Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on July 21, 2015


10.7Amendment Number One to the Reetech Operating Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on November 30, 2015
10.8Amendment Number One to the TRER License, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on November 30, 2015
10.9*Director’s Agreement by and between the Company and Anthony Marchese, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of our Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on February 8, 2011.
10.7 Form of Subscription Agreement for January 2011 Investment, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of our Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on February 8, 2011.
10.810.10* Form of Warrant for January 2011 Investment, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of our Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on February 8, 2011.
10.9Form of Registration Rights Agreement for January 2011 Investment, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of our Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on February 8, 2011.
10.10Shareholders’ Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of our Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on February 8, 2011.
10.11*Director’s Agreement by and between the Company and General Gregory Martin, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 23, 2011.
10.12*Director’s Agreement by and between the Company and Graham A. Karklin incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of our Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-172116) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2011.
10.13Investment Banking Agreement by and between the Company and Sunrise Securities Corp. incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of our Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-172116) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2011.
10.14Finders Agreement by and between the Company and Aspenwood Capital incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of our Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-172116) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2011.
10.15Institutional Public Relations Retainer Agreement by and between the Company and Sunrise Financial Group, Inc. incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of our Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-172116) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2011.


10.16*Summary of Dan Gorski Employment Arrangement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1610.10 of our Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statementthe Company’s Annual Report on Form S-1 (333-172116)10-K for the period ended August 31, 2019 filed with the SEC on May 25, 2011.November 27, 2019
10.17* 
10.11*Summary of Wm. Chris Mathers Employment Arrangement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1710.11 of our Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statementthe Company’s Annual Report on Form S-1 (333-172116)10-K for the period ended August 31, 2019 filed with the SEC on May 25, 2011.November 27, 2019
10.18* Summary of Stanley Korzeb Employment Arrangement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of our Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-172116) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2011.
10.19*10.12* Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Marc LeVier, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 9, 2011.
10.20*Director’s Agreement by and between the Company and Jim Graham, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 9, 2011.
10.21*Option Agreement for Wm. Chris Mathers incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of our Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-172116) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2011.
10.22* 
10.13*Form of Directors Option Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of our Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-172116) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2011.
10.23 Form of Registration Rights Agreement for May/June option exercises, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of our Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2011 filed with the SEC on July 15, 2011.
10.2410.14 Denver Colorado Facilities Lease, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of our Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2011 filed with the SEC on July 15, 2011.
10.25*Employment Agreement between the Company and Anthony Garcia dated August 11, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 of the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on November 15, 2012.
10.26*Director Appointment Agreement dated February 2, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 6, 2012.
10.27Separation Agreement and Release between the Company and Marc LeVier incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 24, 2012.
10.28Severance, Waiver and Release Agreement between the Company and Anthony Garcia dated September 14, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 of the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on November 15, 2012.
10.29Supplemental Agreement between the Company and Christopher Mathers dated September 26, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on November 15, 2012.
10.30Consulting Agreement between the Company and Chemetals, Inc., dated January 22, 2013, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 28, 2013.
10.31 
10.15Lease Agreement between the Company and Southwest Range & Wildlife Foundation, Inc., dated March 6, 2013, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 12, 2013.
31.1(1) Certification
10.16Variation agreement with Morzev PTY LTD. (USA Rare Earth) dated October 2018, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of the Chief Executive Officer pursuantCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2019 filed with the SEC on November 27, 2019.
10.17Amended and Restated Option Agreement with Morzev (USA Rare Earth) dated August 2019, incorporated by reference to Rule 13a-14Exhibit 10.17 of the Exchange Act.Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2019 filed with the SEC on November 27, 2019.
31.2(1) Certification
10.18First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Option Agreement with USA Rare Earth dated June 29, 2020, incorporated by reference to the definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on July 15, 2020
10.19Mining Lease dated September 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 ofForm 10-K for the Exchange Act.period ended August 31, 2020 filed with the SEC on November 30, 2020.
32.1(1) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2(1)10.20 CertificationContribution Agreement, effective as of May 17, 2021, among USA Rare Earth, LLC, Texas Mineral Resources Corp., and Round Top Mountain Development, LLC, filed with the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.SEC on Form 8-K on May 21, 2021
101.INS(2) 
10.21Limited Liability Company Agreement dated effective as of May 17, 2021, among USA Rare Earth, LLC, Texas Mineral Resources Corp., and Round Top Mountain Development, LLC, filed with the SEC on Form 8-K on May 21, 2021
10.22Mineral Exploration and Option Agreement dated effective October 7, 2021 between Standard Silver Corp. and Santa Fe Gold Corporation, filed with the SEC on Form 8-K on November 10, 2021.
10.23Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement dated effective as of June 26, 2023, among USA Rare Earth, LLC, Texas Mineral Resources Corp., and Round Top Mountain Development, LLC, filed with the SEC on Form 8-K on June 27, 2023.
31.1Section 302 Certification(1)
31.2Section 302 Certification(1)
32.1Section 906 Certification(1)
32.2Section 906 Certification(1)


101.INS(2)XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH(2)101.SCH(2)XBRL Taxonomy Extension — Schema
101.CAL(2)101.CAL(2)XBRL Taxonomy Extension — Calculations
101.DEF(2)101.DEF(2)XBRL Taxonomy Extension — Definitions
101.LAB(2)101.LAB(2)XBRL Taxonomy Extension — Labels
101.PRE(2)101.PRE(2)XBRL Taxonomy Extension — Presentations


* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

 

(1)(1)Filed herewith.

(2)(2)Submitted Electronically Herewith. Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Statements of Income/(Loss) and Comprehensive Income/(Loss) for the year ended August 31, 2015 and 2014, (ii)Consolidated Balance Sheets at August 31, 20152023 and 2014,2022; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended August 31, 2023 and 2022; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the yearyears ended August 31, 20152023 and 2014,2022; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended August 31, 2023 and (iv)2022; and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None included.

70 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

TEXAS MINERAL RESOURCES CORP.

 

/s/ Daniel E Gorski 
Daniel E Gorski, Chief Executive Officer 

 

DATED: December 14, 2017November 29, 2023

 

/s/Wm Chris Mathers 
Wm Chris Mathers, Chief Financial Officer 

 

DATED: December 14, 2017November 29, 2023

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature Capacity Date
/s/ Daniel E Gorski Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer and Director December 14, 2017 November 29, 2023
Daniel E Gorski    
     
/s/ Wm Chris Mathers Chief Financial Officer December 14, 2017 November 29, 2023
Wm Chris Mathers    
     
/s/Anthony Marchese Chairman of the Board December 14, 2017 November 29, 2023
Anthony Marchese    
     
/s/ Cecil C Wall Director December 14, 2017 November 29, 2023
Cecil C Wall    
     
/s/ Nicholas PingitorePeter Denetclaw, Jr. Director December 14, 2017 November 29, 2023
Nicholas PingitorePeter Denetclaw, Jr    
     
/s/ James R WolfeLaVern Lund Director December 14, 2017 November 29, 2023
James R WolfeLaVern Lund    
     
/s/ Laura LynchKevin Francis Director December 14, 2017 November 29, 2023
Laura Lynch
/s/ Jack LiftonDirectorDecember 14, 2017 
Jack LiftonKevin Francis    

71