UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162018

Washington Prime Group Inc.
Washington Prime Group, L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Indiana (Both Registrants)
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
001-36252 (Washington Prime Group Inc.)
333-205859 (Washington Prime Group, L.P.)
(Commission File No.)
180 East Broad Street
Columbus, Ohio 43215
(Address of principal executive offices)
46-4323686 (Washington Prime Group Inc.)
46-4674640 (Washington Prime Group, L.P.)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
(614) 621-9000
(Registrants' telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Washington Prime Group Inc.:
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value (185,427,411 shares outstanding as of February 22, 2017)per share New York Stock Exchange
7.5% Series H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share New York Stock Exchange
6.875% Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share New York Stock Exchange

Washington Prime Group, L.P.: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Washington Prime Group Inc.: None
Washington Prime Group, L.P.: Units of limited partnership interest (35,127,735(34,755,660 units outstanding as of February 22, 2017)20, 2019)

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer (as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act). 
Washington Prime Group Inc. Yes x No ¨        Washington Prime Group, L.P. Yes  ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Washington Prime Group Inc. Yes  ¨ No x        Washington Prime Group, L.P. Yes  ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Washington Prime Group Inc. Yes x No ¨        Washington Prime Group, L.P. Yes ¨x No x¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Washington Prime Group Inc. Yes x No ¨        Washington Prime Group, L.P. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in the definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Washington Prime Group Inc.    ¨             Washington Prime Group, L.P. ¨ 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Washington Prime Group Inc. (Check One):    Large accelerated filer x    Accelerated filer¨Emerging growth company ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨    Smaller reporting company ¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Washington Prime Group, L.P. (Check One):    Large accelerated filer ¨    Accelerated filer ¨Emerging growth company ¨
Non-accelerated filer x    Smaller reporting company ¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Washington Prime Group Inc. ¨Washington Prime Group, L.P. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether Registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Washington Prime Group Inc. Yes  ¨ No x        Washington Prime Group, L.P. Yes  ¨ No x

The aggregate market value of shares of common stock held by non-affiliates of Washington Prime Group Inc. was approximately $2,069 million$1.5 billion based on the closing sale price on the New York Stock Exchange for such stock on June 30, 2016.29, 2018.

As of February 20, 2019, Washington Prime Group Inc. had 186,074,461 shares of common stock outstanding. Washington Prime Group, L.P. has no publicly traded equity and no common stock outstanding.

Documents Incorporated By Reference
Portions of Washington Prime Group Inc.'s Proxy Statement in connection with its 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III.

EXPLANATORY NOTE
This report combines the annual reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162018 of Washington Prime Group® Inc. (formerly WP Glimcher Inc. - see Note 1 "Organization") and Washington Prime Group®, L.P. Unless stated otherwise or the context requires otherwise, references to "WPG Inc." mean Washington Prime Group® Inc., an Indiana corporation, and references to "WPG L.P." mean Washington Prime Group®, L.P., an Indiana limited partnership, and its consolidated subsidiaries, in cases where it is important to distinguish between WPG Inc. and WPG L.P. We use the terms "WPG," the "Company," “we,” "us," and “our,” to refer to WPG Inc., WPG L.P., and entities in which WPG Inc. or WPG L.P. (or anany affiliate) has a material interest on a consolidated and combined basis, unless the context indicates otherwise.
WPG Inc. operates as a self-managed and self-administered real estate investment trust (“REIT”). WPG Inc. owns properties and conducts operations through WPG L.P., of which WPG Inc. is the sole general partner and of which it held approximately 84.1%84.4% of the partnership interests (“OP units”) at December 31, 2016.2018. The remaining OP units are owned by various limited partners. As the sole general partner of WPG L.P., WPG Inc. has the exclusive and complete responsibility for WPG L.P.’s day-to-day management and control. Management operates WPG Inc. and WPG L.P. as one enterprise. The management of WPG Inc. consists of the same persons who direct the management of WPG L.P. As general partner with control of WPG L.P., WPG Inc. consolidates WPG L.P. for financial reporting purposes, and WPG Inc. does not have significant assets other than its investment in WPG L.P. Therefore, the assets and liabilities of WPG Inc. and WPG L.P. are substantially the same on their respective consolidated and combined financial statements and the disclosures of WPG Inc. and WPG L.P. also are substantially similar.
The Company believes, therefore, that the combination into a single report of the annual reports on Form 10-K of WPG Inc. and WPG L.P. provides the following benefits:
enhances investors' understanding of the operations of WPG Inc. and WPG L.P. by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business;
eliminates duplicative disclosure and provides a more streamlined and readable presentation since a substantial portion of the disclosure applies to both WPG Inc. and WPG L.P.; and
creates time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one set of disclosures instead of two separate sets of disclosures.
The substantive difference between WPG Inc.’s and WPG L.P.’s filings is the fact that WPG Inc. is a REIT with shares traded on a public stock exchange, while WPG L.P. is a limited partnership with no publicly traded equity. Moreover, the interests in WPG L.P. held by third parties are classified differently by the two entities (i.e. noncontrolling interests for WPG Inc. and partners' equity for WPG L.P.). In the consolidated and combined financial statements, these differences are primarily reflected in the equity section of the consolidated balance sheets and in the consolidated statements of equity. Apart from the different equity presentation, the consolidated and combined financial statements of WPG Inc. and WPG L.P. are nearly identical.
This combined Annual Report on Form 10-K for WPG Inc. and WPG L.P. includes, for each entity, separate financial statements (but combined footnotes), separate reports on disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, and separate CEO/CFO certifications. In addition, if there were any material differences between WPG Inc. and WPG L.P. with respect to any other financial and non-financial disclosure items required by Form 10-K, they would be discussed separately herein.
WPG L.P. is a voluntary filer. We are evaluating whether or not WPG L.P. will continue to voluntarily file reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").

WASHINGTON PRIME GROUP INC. AND WASHINGTON PRIME GROUP, L.P.
Annual Report on Form 10-K
December 31, 20162018
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item No. Page No. Page No.
Part IPart I Part I 
1.BusinessBusiness
1A.Risk FactorsRisk Factors
1B.Unresolved Staff CommentsUnresolved Staff Comments
2.PropertiesProperties
3.Legal ProceedingsLegal Proceedings
4.Mine Safety DisclosuresMine Safety Disclosures
Part IIPart II Part II 
5.Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity SecuritiesMarket for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
6.Selected Financial DataSelected Financial Data
7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsManagement's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market RiskQuantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
8.Financial Statements and Supplementary DataFinancial Statements and Supplementary Data
9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureChanges in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
9A.Controls and ProceduresControls and Procedures
9B.Other InformationOther Information
Part IIIPart III Part III 
10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceDirectors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
11.Executive CompensationExecutive Compensation
12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersSecurity Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director IndependenceCertain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
14.Principal Accounting Fees and ServicesPrincipal Accounting Fees and Services
Part IVPart IV Part IV 
15.Exhibits and Financial Statement SchedulesExhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
16.Form 10-K Summary
SignaturesSignaturesSignatures


Part I
Item 1.    Business
Unless the context otherwise requires, references to "WPG," "the Company," "we," "us," and"us" or "our" refer to WPG Inc., WPG L.P. and entities in which WPG Inc. or WPG L.P. (or anany affiliate) has a material ownership or financial interest, on a consolidated basis.
General
Washington Prime Group™ Group®Inc. (formerly named WP Glimcher Inc.) ("WPG Inc.") is an Indiana corporation that operates as a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). REITsWPG Inc. will generally not be liablequalify as a REIT for U.S. federal corporate income taxestax purposes as long as they continueit continues to distribute not less than 100%at least 90% of theirits REIT taxable income, exclusive of net capital gains, and satisfy certain other requirements. WPG Inc. will generally be allowed a deduction against its U.S. federal income tax liability for dividends paid by it to REIT shareholders, thereby reducing or eliminating any corporate level taxation to WPG Inc. Washington Prime Group, L.P. ("WPG L.P.") is WPG Inc.'s majority-owned limited partnership subsidiary that owns, develops, and manages, through its affiliates, all of WPG Inc.'s real estate properties and other assets. WPG Inc. is the sole general partner of WPG L.P. On May 28, 2014, WPG separated from Simon Property Group Inc. ("SPG") through the distribution of 100% of the outstanding units of WPG L.P. to the owners of Simon Property Group L.P. and 100% of the outstanding shares of WPG to the SPG common shareholders in a tax-free distribution. Prior to the separation, WPG Inc. and WPG L.P. were wholly owned subsidiaries of SPG and its subsidiaries ("SPG Businesses"). At the time of the separation, our assets consisted of interests in 98 shopping centers (the "WPG Legacy Properties"). On January 15, 2015, the Company acquired Glimcher Realty Trust ("GRT"), pursuant to a definitive agreement and plan of merger with GRT and certain affiliated parties of each dated September 16, 2014 (the "Merger Agreement"), in a stock and cash transaction valued at approximately $4.2 billion, including the assumption of debt (the "Merger"). Additionally, included in the consideration were operating partnership units held by limited partners and preferred stock. In the Merger, we acquired material interests in 23 shopping centers (the "Merger Properties") comprised of approximately 15.8 million square feet of gross leasable area and assumed additional mortgages on 14 properties with a fair value of approximately $1.4 billion. Prior to our separation from SPG, WPG Inc. entered into agreements with SPG under which SPG provided various services to WPG Inc. relating primarily to the legacy SPG Businesses and WPG Legacy Properties, including accounting, asset management, development, human resources, information technology, leasing, legal, marketing, public reporting and tax. The charges for the services were based on an hourly or per transaction fee arrangement and pass-through of out-of-pocket costs. TheseExcept for certain indemnification obligations and other terms and conditions, these underlying agreements expired effective May 31, 2016.
We own, develop and manage enclosed retail properties and community centers.open air properties. As of December 31, 2016,2018, our assets consisted of material interests in 114108 shopping centers in the United States, comprised of approximately 6358 million square feet of managed gross leasable area.area ("GLA").
Transactions
For a description of our operational strategies and developments in our business during 2016,2018 see Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," of this Form 10-K.
Segments
Our primary business is the ownership, development and management of retail real estate within the United States. We have aggregated our operations, including enclosed retail properties and community centers,open air properties, into one reportable segment because they have similar economic characteristics and we provide similar products and services to similar types of tenants and, in many cases, the same tenants. For the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, Signet Jewelers, Ltd. (based on common parent ownership of tenants including, but not limited to, Body by Pagoda, Jared's, Kay Jewelers, Piercing Pagoda, Rogers Jewelers, and Zales Jewelers) accounted for approximately 3.2%2.9% of base minimum rents. Further, Signet Jewelers, Ltd., L Brands, Inc. (based on common parent ownership of tenants including Bath & Body Works, La Senza, Pink, Victoria's Secret, and White Barn Candle), Dick's Sporting Goods (based on common parent ownership including Dick's Sporting Goods, Field & Stream, and Golf Galaxy) and Footlocker, Inc. (based on common parent ownership including Champs Sports, Foot Action USA, Footlocker, Kids Footlocker, Lady Footlocker, and World Footlocker), in aggregate, comprised approximately 8.2%9.4% of base minimum rents. See Item 2. "Properties" for further information on tenant mix.

Other Policies
The following is a discussion of our investment policies, financing policies, conflicts of interest policies and policies with respect to certain other activities. One or more of these policies may be amended or rescinded from time to time without a stockholder vote.

Investment Policies
We are in the business of owning, managing and operating enclosed retail centersproperties and community centersopen air properties across the United States and while we emphasize these real estate investments, we may also invest in equity or debt securities of other entities engaged in real estate activities or securities of other issuers. However, any of these investments would be subject to the percentage ownership limitations and gross income tests necessary for REIT qualification of WPG Inc. under federal tax laws as well as our own internal policies concerning conflicts of interest and related party transactions. These REIT limitations mean that we cannot make an investment that would cause our real estate assets to be less than 75% of our total assets. We must also derive at least 75% of our gross income directly or indirectly from investments relating to real property or mortgages on real property, including "rents from real property," dividends from other REITs and, in certain circumstances, interest from certain types of temporary investments. In addition, we must also derive at least 95% of our gross income from such real property investments, and from dividends, interest and gains from the sale or dispositions of stock or securities or from other combinations of the foregoing.
Subject to REIT limitations, we may invest in the securities of other issuers in connection with acquisitions of indirect interests in real estate. Such an investment would normally be in the form of general or limited partnership or membership interests in special purpose partnerships and limited liability companies that own one or more properties. We may, in the future, acquire all or substantially all of the securities or assets of other REITs, management companies or similar entities where such investments would be consistent with our investment policies.
Financing Policies
Because WPG Inc.'s REIT qualification requires it to distribute at least 90% of its taxable income, exclusive of net capital gains, we regularly access the capital markets to raise the funds necessary to finance operations, acquisitions, strategic investments, development and redevelopment opportunities, and to refinance maturing debt. We must comply with customary covenants contained in our financing agreements that limit our ratio of debt to total assets or market value, as defined in such agreements. For example, WPG L.P.'s current line of credit and term loans contain covenants that restrict the total amount of debt of WPG L.P. to 60% of total assets, as defined under the related agreements, and secured debt to 40% of total assets, with slight easing of restrictions during the four trailing quarters following a portfolio acquisition. In addition, these agreements contain other covenants requiring compliance with financial ratios. Furthermore, the amount of debt that we may incur is limited as a practical matter by our desire to maintain acceptable ratings for our equity securities and debt securities of WPG L.P. We strive to maintain investment grade ratings at all times, but we cannot assure you that we will be able to do so in the future.future (see "Liquidity and Capital Resources" within Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of this Form 10-K for a discussion of events that occurred subsequent to December 31, 2018).
If WPG Inc.'s Board of Directors determines to seek additional capital, we may raise such capital by offering equity or debt securities, creating joint ventures with existing ownership interests in properties, entering into joint venture arrangements for new development projects, or a combination of these methods. If the Board of Directors determines to raise equity capital, it may, without shareholder approval, issue additional shares of common stock or other capital stock. The Board of Directors may issue a number of shares up to the amount of our authorized capital in any manner and on such terms and for such consideration as it deems appropriate. Such securities may be senior to the outstanding classes of common stock. Such securities also may include additional classes of preferred stock, which may be convertible into common stock. Existing shareholders have no preemptive right to purchase shares in any subsequent offering of WPG Inc.'s securities. Any such offering could dilute a shareholder's investment in WPG Inc.
We expect most future borrowings would be made through WPG L.P. or its subsidiaries. Borrowings may be in the form of bank borrowings, publicly and privately placed debt instruments, or purchase money obligations to the sellers of properties. Any such indebtedness may be secured or unsecured. Any such indebtedness may also have full or limited recourse to the borrower or be cross-collateralized with other debt, or may be fully or partially guaranteed by WPG L.P. Although we may borrow to fund the payment of dividends, we currently have no expectation that we will regularly do so. See "Financing and Debt" within Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," of this Form 10-K for a discussion of our debt arrangements as of December 31, 2016.2018.
We could potentially issue additional debt securities through WPG L.P., and we may issue such debt securities which may be convertible into capital stock or be accompanied by warrants to purchase capital stock. We also may sell or securitize our lease receivables.

We may also finance acquisitions through the issuance of common shares or preferred shares, the issuance of additional units of partnership interest in WPG L.P., the issuance of preferred units of WPG L.P., the issuance of other securities including unsecured notes and mortgage debt, draws on our credit facilities or sale or exchange of ownership interests in properties, including through the formation of joint venture agreements.agreements or other arrangements.

WPG L.P. may also issue units to transferors of properties or other partnership interests which may permit the transferor to defer gain recognition for tax purposes.
We do not have a policy limiting the number or amount of mortgages that may be placed on any particular property. Mortgage financing instruments, however, usually limit additional indebtedness on such properties. Additionally, unsecured credit facilities, unsecured note indentures and other contracts may limit our ability to borrow and contain limits on the amount of secured indebtedness we may incur.
Typically, we will invest in or form special purpose entities to assist us in obtaining secured permanent financing at attractive terms. Permanent financing may be structured as a mortgage loan on a single property, or on a group of properties, and will generally require us to provide a mortgage lien on the property or properties in favor of an institutional third party, as a joint venture with a third party, or as a securitized financing. For securitized financings, we may create special purpose entities to own the properties. These special purpose entities, which are common in the real estate industry, are structured with the intention of not being consolidated in a bankruptcy proceeding involving a parent company. We will decide upon the structure of the financing based upon the best terms then available to us and whether the proposed financing is consistent with our other business objectives. For accounting purposes, we will include the outstanding securitized debt of special purpose entities owning consolidated properties as part of our consolidated indebtedness.
Conflicts of Interest Policies
We maintain policies and have entered into agreements designed to reduce or eliminate potential conflicts of interest. We have adopted governance principles governing our affairs and those of the Board of Directors.
Under WPG Inc.’s Governance Principles, directors must disclose to the rest of the Board of Directors any potential conflict of interest they may have with respect to any matter under discussion and, if appropriate, recuse themselves from Board of Director discussions of, and/or refrain from voting on, such matter. Directors shall not have a duty to communicate or present any corporate opportunity to WPG Inc. and WPG Inc. renounces any interest or expectancy in such opportunity and waives any claim against a director arising from the fact that he or she does not present the opportunity to WPG Inc. or pursues or facilitates the pursuit of the opportunity by others; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not apply in a case in which a director is presented with a corporate opportunity in writing expressly in his or her capacity as a director or officer of WPG Inc.
In addition, we have a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all of our officers, directors, and employees. At least a majority of the members of WPG Inc.'s Board of Directors, Governance and Nominating Committee, Audit Committee and Compensation Committee must qualify as independent under the listing standards for New York Stock Exchange listed companies. Any transaction between us and any officer, WPG Inc. director or any family member of any of the foregoing persons, or 5% shareholder of WPG Inc. must be approved pursuant to our related party transaction policy.
Policies With Respect To Certain Other Activities
We intend to make investments which are consistent with WPG Inc.'s qualification as a REIT, unless the Board of Directors determines that it is no longer in WPG Inc.'s best interests to so qualify as a REIT. The Board of Directors may make such a determination because of changing circumstances or changes in the REIT requirements. We have authority to offer shares of our capital stock or other securities in exchange for property. We also have authority to repurchase or otherwise reacquire our shares or any other securities. We may issue shares of our common stock, or cash at our option, to holders of units in future periods upon exercise of such holders' rights under the Operating Partnership agreement. Our policy prohibits us from making any loans to our directors or executive officers for any purpose. We may make loans to the joint ventures in which we participate. Additionally, we may make or buy interests in loans for real estate properties owned by others.
Competition
Our direct competitors include other publicly-traded retail development and operating companies, retail real estate companies, commercial property developers and other owners of retail real estate that engage in similar businesses. Within our property portfolio, we compete for retail tenants and the nature and extent of the competition we face varies from property to property. With respect to specific alternative retail property types, we have faced increased competition over the last several years from both lifestyle centers and power centers, in addition to other community centersopen air properties and enclosed retail properties.

We believe the principal factors that retailers consider in making their leasing decisions include, but are not limited to, the following:
Consumer demographics;
Quality, design and location of properties;
Total number and geographic distribution of properties;
Diversity of retailers and anchor tenants;
Management and operational expertise; and
Rental rates.
In addition, because our revenue potential is linked to the success of our retailers, we indirectly share exposure to the same competitive factors and market forces that our retail tenants experience in their respective markets when trying to attract individual shoppers. These dynamics include general competition from other retail properties, including outlet properties and other discount shopping properties, as well as competition with discount shopping clubs, catalog companies, direct mail, home shopping networks, and telemarketing. The changes in consumer shopping behavior to increase purchases on-line from their computers and mobile devices provide retailers with distribution options other than brick and mortar retail stores and has resulted in competitive alternatives that could have a material adverse effect on our ability to lease, develop and redevelop traditional commercial retail space and on the level of rents we can obtain.
Seasonality
The shopping center business is, to some extent, seasonal in nature with tenants typically achieving the highest levels of sales during our fiscal fourth quarter due to the holiday season, which generally results in higher percentage rent income in the fourth quarter. Additionally, enclosed shopping centers achieve a substantial portion of their specialty (temporary retailer) rents during the holiday season. Thus, occupancy levels and revenue production are generally the highest in the fourth quarter of each year. Results of operations realized in any one quarter may not be indicative of the results likely to be experienced over the course of our fiscal year.
Environmental Matters
See Item 1A. "Risk Factors" for information concerning the potential effects of environmental regulations on our operations.
Intellectual Property
WPG L.P., by and through its affiliates, holds service marks registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, including the terms Washington Prime Group® (expiration date January 2028), The Outlet Collection® (expiration(expiration date October 2023), Shelby’s Sugar Shop® (expiration date September 2028), and TANGIBLE®(expiration date September 2028) as well as the names of certain of our properties such as Scottsdale Quarter® (expiration date November 2019) and Polaris Fashion Place® (expiration date July 2022), and other marketing terms, phrases, and materials it uses to promote its business, services, and properties. Additionally, WPG L.P.
Sustainability
ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance)
We know that ESG issues, otherwise known as corporate sustainability, are important to our stakeholders, and they are important to the Company. We believe in a strong commitment to the community and embrace opportunities to improve the lives of our guests, employees and the environment.
The Board of Directors’ Sustainability Committee, as well as our internal, interdisciplinary ESG Steering Committee, work together with senior leadership to further establish sustainability as a key business driver as it relates to how we redevelop and operate our retail properties, conduct business with our guests, engage with our communities and create a productive and positive work environment for our employees. The Company will continue to work diligently to find ways to manage our properties' carbon footprint and identify environmentally-friendly alternatives that reduce waste, maximize energy efficiency and improve recycling efforts.
Some examples of the Company’s focus on environmental sustainability investments in its properties include energy efficient Light Emitting Diode ("LED") lighting projects, charging stations for electric cars, solar energy panels, and many more innovations. As it relates to new projects, we are focused on the area of energy reduction and leveraging sustainability to achieve cost efficiencies in our operations. We are working with local and state municipalities to expand the Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) model promulgated by the U.S. Department of Energy to help finance energy efficiency projects at its retail properties. The Company continues to install efficient LED lighting, including installations at nearly 40 of our retail properties in the past two years, which has filedled to a trademark application9 percent reduction in the Company's annual electric consumption.

In addition, the Company is working with a third party to implement operational and technology improvements at the United States Patentproperty level. This initiative includes technical communications, WiFi design and Trademark Office forimplementation, as well as analytics and reporting in order to make informed future energy management decisions. We continue to explore ways to innovate even more so in the name "Washington Prime Group."future.
We believe a commitment to incorporating sustainable practices into many of the areas of our business will add long term value to our portfolio of retail town centers.
Employees
At December 31, 2016,2018, we had approximately 940834 employees, of which approximately 230107 were part-time.
Headquarters
Our corporate headquarters are located at 180 East Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, and our telephone number is (614) 621-9000. We have an additional corporate office located at 111 Monument Circle, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204.
Available Information
WPG Inc. and WPG L.P. file this Annual Report on Form 10-K and other periodic reports and statements electronically with the Securities Exchange Commission ("SEC"). The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, statements and proxy and information statements, and other information provided by issuers at www.sec.gov. WPG Inc.'s and WPG L.P.'s reports and statements, including amendments, are also available free of charge on its website, www.washingtonprime.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after such documents are filed with the SEC. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this report and such information should not be considered a part of this report. You may also read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the public reference room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.

Item 1A.    Risk Factors
The following risk factors, among others, could materially affect our business, financial condition, operating results, or cash flows.flows, fiscal outlook and business reputation. These risk factors may describe situations beyond our control and you should carefully consider them. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that are currently not believed to be material could also affect our actual results. We may update these risk factors in our future periodic reports, other filings, and public announcements.
Risks Related to Our Business and Operations
We might not be able to renew leases or relet space at existing properties, or lease newly developed properties.
When leases for our existing properties expire, the premises might not be relet or the terms of reletting, including the cost of tenant allowances and concessions to tenants,and the size of the space, might be less favorable than the current lease terms, due to strong competition or otherwise. Also, we might not be able to lease new properties to an appropriate mix of tenants or for rents that are consistent with our projections. To the extent that our leasing plans are not achieved, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected and our operational and strategic objectives may not be achieved readily or at all.
Our lease agreements with our tenants typically provide a fixed rate for certain cost reimbursement charges; if our operating expenses increase or we are otherwise unable to collect sufficient cost reimbursement payments from our tenants, our business, results of operations and financial condition might be materially adversely affected.
Energy costs, repairs, maintenance and capital improvements to common areas of our properties, janitorial services, administrative, property and liability insurance costs and security costs are typically allocable to our properties' tenants. Our lease agreements typically provide that the tenant is liable for a portion of such common area maintenance charges (which we refer to as "CAM") and other operating expenses. The majority of our current leases require the tenant to pay a fixed periodic amount to reimburse a portion of our CAM and other operating expenses. In these cases, a tenant will pay either (a) a specified rent amount that includes the fixed CAM and operating expense reimbursement amount, or (b) a fixed expense reimbursement amount separate from the rent payment. BothGenerally, both types of CAM and operating expense reimbursement payments are subject to annual increases regardless of the actual amount of CAM and other operating expenses. As a result, any adjustments in tenant payments do not depend on whether operating expenses increase or decrease, causing us to be responsible for any excess amounts. In the event that our operating expenses increase, CAM and tenant reimbursements that we receive might not allow us to recover a substantial portion of these operating costs.
Additionally, the computation of cost reimbursements from tenants for CAM, insurance and real estate taxes is complex and involves numerous judgments, including interpretation of lease terms and other tenant lease provisions, including those in leases that we assume in connection with property acquisitions. Unforeseen or underestimated expenses might cause us to collect less than our actual expenses. The amounts we calculate and bill could also be disputed by tenants or become the subject of a tenant audit or even litigation. There can be no assurance that we will collect all or substantially all of this amount.
Some of our properties depend on anchor stores or major tenants to attract shoppers and could be materially adversely affected by the loss of, or a store closure by, one or more of these anchor stores or major tenants.
Our community centersopen air properties and enclosed retail properties are typically anchored by department stores and other large nationally or regionally recognized tenants. The value of some of our properties could be materially adversely affected if these department stores or major tenants fail to comply with their contractual obligations, seek concessions in order to continue operations, or cease their operations.

For example, among department stores and other large stores, corporate merger or consolidation activity typically results in the closure of duplicate or geographically overlapping store locations. Resulting adverse pressure on the businesses of our department stores and major tenants could have an adverse impact upon our own results. Certain department stores, including The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. which liquidated in 2018, and Sears Holdings Corporation, and other national retailers have experienced, and might continue to experience, depending on consumer confidence levels or overall economic conditions, considerable decreases in customer traffic in their retail stores, increased competition from alternative retail options, such as those accessible via the Internet orand other mediums, and other forms of pressure on their business models. Pressure on these department stores and national retailers could impact their ability to maintain their stores, meet their obligations both to us and to their external lenders and suppliers, withstand takeover attempts by investors or rivals or avoid bankruptcy and/or liquidation, all of which could result in impairment or closures of their stores. Other of our tenants might be entitled to modify the economic or other terms of their existing leases in the event of such closures (including through(through co-tenancy clauses), which could decrease rents and/or operating expense reimbursements.reimbursements or entitle such retailers to close their stores. The leases of some anchors might permit the anchor to transfer its lease, including any attendant approval rights, to another retailer.

The transfer to a new anchor could cause customer traffic in the property to decrease or to be composed of different types of customers, which could reduce the income generated by that property and adversely impact development or re-development prospects for such property. A transfer of a lease to a new anchor also could allow other tenants to make reduced rental payments or to terminate their leases at the property, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
Additionally, department store or major tenant closures might result in decreased customer traffic, which could lead to decreased sales at our properties and adversely impact our ability to successfully execute our leasing strategy and objectives. If the sales of stores operating in our properties decline significantly due to the closing of anchor stores or other national retailers, adverse economic conditions, or other reasons, tenants might be unable to pay their minimum rents or expense recovery charges, which would likely negatively impact our financial results. In the event of any default by a tenant, whether a department store, national or regional retailer or otherwise, we might not be able to fully recover and/or experience delays and costs in enforcing our rights as landlord to recover amounts due to us under the terms of our agreements with such parties.
We face risks associated with the acquisition, development, re-development and expansion of properties, including risks of higher than projected costs, inability to obtain financing, inability to obtain required consents or approvals and inability to attract tenants at anticipated rates.
In the event we seek to acquire and develop new properties and expand and redevelop existing properties, we might not be successful in identifying or pursuing acquisition, development or re-development/expansion opportunities. Additionally, newly acquired properties, (including those related to the Merger), developed, re-developed or expanded properties might not perform as well as expected. Other related risks we face include, without limitation, the following:
Construction and other development costs of a project could be higher than projected, potentially making the project unfeasible or unprofitable;
We might not be able to obtain financing or to refinance loans on favorable terms, if at all;
We might be unable to obtain zoning, occupancy or other governmental approvals, or the approvals obtained may not be adequate;
Occupancy rates and rents might not meet our projections and as a result the project could be unprofitable; and
In some cases, we might need the consent of third parties, such as anchor tenants, mortgage lenders and joint venture partners to conduct acquisition, development, re-development or expansion activities, and those consents may be withheld, take an unexpected amount of time to be obtained, or be subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions.
If a project is unsuccessful, either because it is not meeting our expectations when operational or was not completed according to the project planning, we could lose our investment in the project or have to incur an impairment charge relating to the asset or development which could then adversely impact our financial results. Furthermore, if we guarantee the property's financing, our loss could exceed our investment in the project.
Our assets may be subject to impairment charges that may materially affect our financial results.
We evaluate our real estate assets and other assets for impairment indicators whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that recoverability of our investment in the asset is not reasonably assured. Furthermore, this evaluation is conducted no less frequently than quarterly, irrespective of changes in circumstances. Our determination of whether a particular held-for-use asset is impaired is based upon the undiscounted projected cash flows used for the impairment analysis and our determination of the asset's estimated fair value, that in turn are based upon our plans for the respective asset and our views of market and economic conditions. With respect to assets held-for-sale, our determination of whether such an asset is impaired is based upon market and economic conditions. If we determine that an impairment has occurred, then we would be required under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States ("GAAP") to make an adjustment to the net carrying value of the asset, which could

have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in the accounting period in which the adjustment is made. Furthermore, changes in estimated future cash flows due to a change in our plans, policies, or views of market and economic conditions could result in the recognition of additional impairment losses for already impaired assets, which, under the applicable accounting guidance, could be substantial. See the "Impairment" section within Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a discussion of recent impairments.
Our ability to change the composition of our real estate portfolio is limited because real estate investments are relatively illiquid.
Our properties represent a substantial portion of our total consolidated assets, and these investments are relatively illiquid. As a result, our ability to sell one or more of our properties or investments in real estate in response to any changes in economic or other conditions is limited. If we want to sell a property, we cannot be certain that we will be able to dispose of it in the desired time period or that the sale price of a property will exceed the cost of our investment in that property, which may then have an adverse impact on our financial results.

Clauses in leases with certain tenants of our development or redevelopment properties frequentlymay include inducements, such as reduced rent and tenant allowance payments, which can reduce our rents and Funds From Operations ("FFO"). As a result, these development or redevelopment properties are more likely to achieve lower returns during their stabilization periods than our previous development or redevelopment properties.
The leases for a number of the tenants that have opened stores at properties we have developed or redeveloped have reduced rent from co-tenancy clauses that allow those tenants to pay reduced rent until occupancy at the respective property reaches certain thresholds and/or certain named co-tenants open stores at the respective property. Additionally, some tenants may have rent abatement clauses that delay rent commencement for a prolonged period of time after initial occupancy. The effect of these clauses reduces our rents and FFO while they are applicable. We expect to continue to offer co-tenancy and rent abatement clauses in the future to attract tenants to our development and redevelopment properties. As a result, our current and future development and redevelopment properties are more likely to achieve lower returns during their stabilization periods than other projects of this nature historically have, which may adversely impact our investment in such developments, as well as our financial condition and results of operations.
Our ability Additionally, the prevalence and volume of such properties is likely to changeincrease in our development and redevelopment pipeline at an unpredictable rate in light of the compositionrecent proliferation of our real estate portfolio is limited because real estate investments are relatively illiquid.
Our properties represent a substantial portion of our total consolidated assets,bankruptcy filings and these investments are relatively illiquid. As a result, our ability to sell one or more of our properties or investments in real estate in response to any changes in economicclosures by retailers occupying "big box", anchor or other conditions is limited. If we want to sell a property, we cannot be certain that we will be able to dispose of it in the desired time period or that the sale price of a property will exceed the cost of our investment in that property,traditionally large spaces which may thencan have an adverse impact on our financial results.condition and results of operations.
We face a wide range of competition that could affect our ability to operate profitably.
Our properties compete with other retail properties and other forms of retail, such as catalogs and e-commerce websites. Competition could also come from community centers,open air properties, outlet centers, lifestyle centers, and enclosed retail properties, and both existing and future development projects. The presence of competitive alternatives might adversely impact the success of our existing properties, our ability to lease space and the rental rates we can obtain. We also compete with other retail property developers to acquire prime development sites. Additionally, we compete with other retail property companies for tenants and qualified management. If we are unable to successfully compete, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
The increase in and prevalence of digital and mobile technology usage has increased the speed of the transition of a percentage of market share from shopping at physical locations to web-based purchases. If we are unsuccessful in adapting our business to changing consumer spending habits, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. Additionally, our investments in ventures aimed at finding innovative and unique uses within shopping centers and retail generally may be unsuccessful and incur expenses, losses, and use resources to a degree that adversely impacts our financial results without a corresponding positive financial return or operational benefit.
If we lose our key management personnel, we might not be able to successfully manage our business and achieve our objectives.
Our management team includes experienced members formerly employed by SPG who worked on SPG’s mall platformhas substantial experience in owning, operating, acquiring, and community center management teamdeveloping enclosed shopping centers and who have a detailed understanding of our community center properties, experienced members of GRT’s former management team, and certain other key individuals.open air properties. A large part of our success depends on the leadership and performance of our executive management team.team and we cannot guarantee that they will remain with us. If we unexpectedly lose the services of these individuals, we might not be able to successfully manage our business or achieve our business objectives. Additionally, we continue to actively recruit management and other professional talent within the real estate and retail industries necessary to manage our properties to optimal performance. If we are not able to successfully recruit such personnel or cannot do so readily, this may adversely impact our ability to manage our business, achieve our financial goals, or meet our strategic and operational objectives.
We have limited control with respect to some properties that are partially owned or managed by third parties, which could adversely affect our ability to sell or refinance or otherwise take actions concerning these properties that would be in the best interests of WPG Inc.'s shareholders.
We may continue to co-invest with third parties through partnerships, joint ventures, or other entities, including without limitation by acquiring controlling or non-controlling interests in, or sharing responsibility for, managing the affairs of a property, partnership, joint venture or other entity. WeAt December 31, 2018, we do not have sole decision-making authority regarding the six13 unconsolidated properties that we currently hold through joint ventures with third parties at December 31, 2016.

parties.
Additionally, we might not be in a position to exercise sole decision-making authority regarding any future properties that we hold in a partnership or joint venture. Investments in partnerships, joint ventures or other entities could, under certain circumstances, involve risks that would not be present were a third party not involved, including the possibility that partners or co-venturers might become bankrupt, suffer a deterioration in their financial condition, or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions. Partners or co-venturers could have economic or other business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our own business interests or goals, and could be in a position to take actions contrary to our policies or objectives.

Such investments also have the potential risk of creating impasses on decisions, such as a sale or financing, because neither we nor our partner or co-venturer would have full control over the partnership or joint venture. Disputes between us and partners or co-venturers might result in litigation or arbitration that could increase our expenses and prevent our officers and/or directors from focusing their time and efforts on our business. Consequently, actions by, or disputes with, partners or co-venturers might result in subjecting properties owned by the partnership or joint venture to additional risk. Additionally, we risk the possibility of being liable for the actions of our third-party partners or co-venturers.
Our revenues are dependent on the level of revenues realized by our tenants, and a decline in their revenues could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are subject to various risks that affect the retail environment generally, including levels of consumer spending, seasonality, changes in economic conditions, unemployment rates, an increase in the use of the Internet by retailers and consumers, and natural disasters. Additionally, levels of consumer spending could be adversely affected by, for example, increases in consumer savings rates, increases in tax rates, reduced levels of income growth, interest rate increases, and other declines in consumer net worth and a strengthening of the U.S. dollar as compared to non-U.S. currencies.
As a result of these and other economic and market-based factors, our tenants might be unable to pay their existing minimum rents or expense recovery charges due. Because substantially all of our income is derived from rentals of commercial real property, our income and cash flow would be adversely affected if a significant number of tenants are unable to meet their obligations or their revenues decline, especially if they were tenants with a significant number of locations within our portfolio. Additionally, a decrease in retail demand could make it difficult for us to renew or re-lease our properties at lease rates equal to or above historical rates.
Store closures and/or bankruptcy filings by tenants could occur during the course of our operations. We continually seek to re-lease vacant spaces resulting from tenant terminations. Large scale store closings or the bankruptcy of a tenant, particularly an anchor tenant, might make it more difficult to lease the remainder of a particular property or properties. Furthermore, certain of our tenants, including anchor tenants, hold the right under their lease(s) to terminate their lease(s) or reduce their rental rate if certain occupancy conditions are not met, if certain anchor tenants close, if certain sales levels (sales kick-out provisions) or profit margins are not achieved, or if an exclusive use provision is violated, which all could be triggered in the event of one or more tenant bankruptcies. Future tenant bankruptcies, especially by anchor tenants, could adversely affect our properties or impact our ability to successfully execute our re-leasing strategy as well as adversely impactingimpact our ability to achieve theour operational and strategic objectives.
Economic and market conditions could negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The market in which we operate is affected by a number of factors that are largely beyond our control but could nevertheless have a significant negative impact on us. These factors include, but are not limited to:
Fluctuations or frequent variances in interest rates and credit spreads;
The availability of credit, including the price, terms and conditions under which it can be obtained;
A decrease in consumer spending or sentiment, including as a result of increases in savings rates and tax increases, and any effect that this might have on retail activity;
The actual and perceived state of the real estate market, market for dividend-paying stocks and public capital markets in general; and
Unemployment rates, both nationwide and within the primary markets in which we operate.
In addition, increased inflation might have a pronounced negative impact on the interest expense we pay in connection with our outstanding indebtedness and our general and administrative expenses, as these costs could increase at a rate higher than our rents. Inflation might adversely affect tenant leases with stated rent increases, which could be lower than the increase in inflation at any given time. Inflation could also have an adverse effect on consumer spending which could impact our tenants' sales and, in turn, our own results of operations.

Conversely, deflation might result in a decline in general price levels, often caused by a decrease in the supply of money or credit. The predominant effects of deflation are high unemployment, credit contraction and weakened consumer demand. Restricted lending practices might impact our ability to obtain financing for our properties and might also negatively impact our tenants' ability to obtain credit. Decreases in consumer demand can have a direct impact on our tenants and the rents we receive.
A slow-growing economy hinders consumer spending, which could decrease the level of discretionary income available for shopping at our properties. Weak income growth could weigh down consumer spending, which could be further affected if the overall economy suffers a setback.

An increase in market interest rates could increase our interest costs on existing and future debt and could adversely affect WPG Inc.'s common share price.
An environment of rising interest rates could lead holders of our common shares to seek higher yields through other investments, which could adversely affect the market price of our common shares. One of the factors that may influence the price of our common shares in public markets is the annual distribution rate we pay as compared with the yields on alternative investments. Additionally, increases in market interest rates could result in increased borrowing costs for us, which may adversely affect our cash flow and the amounts available for distributions to our shareholders.
We have significant indebtedness, which could adversely affect our business, including decreasing our business flexibility and increasing our interest expense.
The consolidated indebtedness of our business as of December 31, 20162018 was approximately $3.5$2.9 billion. We have and will continue to incur various costs and expenses associated with our transactions and executing our operational and fiscal strategy. OurAny future increased levels of indebtedness could also reduce access to capital and increase borrowing costs generally, thereby reducing funds available for working capital, capital expenditures, tenant improvements, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes and may create competitive disadvantages for us relative to other companies with lower debt levels. If we do not achieve our operational and growth goals or if the financial performance of the Company does not meet current expectations, then our ability to service our indebtedness may be adversely impacted. Lastly, if interest rates increase, the cost of capital and expenses of debt service requirements relating to our variable rate debt, which constitutes 24.3%15.2% of our consolidated indebtedness as of December 31, 2016,2018, would increase which could adversely affect our cash flows.
We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service and repay all of our debt and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy our obligations under our debt, which may not be successful.
Our ability to make scheduled payments on, or to refinance, our debt will depend on our financial condition, liquidity and operating performance, which are subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to certain financial, business, legislative, regulatory and other factors beyond our control. We may be unable to maintain a level of cash flows from operating activities sufficient to permit us both to fund our business purposes and to pay the principal of, or premium, if any, and interest on our debt.
If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to service and repay our debt and fund other cash requirements, we could face substantial liquidity problems and could be forced to reduce or delay investments and capital expenditures or to sell assets or operations, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our debt. We may not be able to effect any such alternative measures, if necessary, on commercially reasonable terms or at all and, even if successful, such alternative actions may not allow us to meet all of our debt obligations. Our unsecured revolving credit facility (the "Revolver") and senior unsecured term loan (the "Term Loan" and collectively with the Revolver, the "Facility") were establishedamended and restated on May 15, 2014,January 22, 2018 and our new unsecured term loans established during 2015 (the "New Term Loans") restrict (i) our ability to dispose of assets and (ii) our ability to incur debt. We may not be able to consummate those dispositions or to obtain proceeds in an amount sufficient to meet any debt obligations then due.
In addition, we conduct our operations through our subsidiaries. Our subsidiaries may not be able to, or may not be permitted to, make cash available to us to enable us to make payments in respect of our debt. Each subsidiary is a distinct legal entity and, under certain circumstances, legal and contractual prohibitions or other restrictions may limit our ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries. In the event that our subsidiaries do not make sufficient cash available to us, we may be unable to make required principal, premium, if any, and interest payments on our debt.
Our inability to obtain sufficient cash flows from our subsidiaries, whether as a result of their performance or otherwise, to satisfy our debt, or to refinance our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all, would materially and adversely affect our financial position, condition, liquidity and results of operations.
If we fail to make required payments in respect of our debt, (i) we will be in default thereunder and, as a result, the related debt holders and lenders, and potentially other debt holders and lenders, could declare all outstanding principal and interest to be

due and payable, (ii) the lenders under the FacilityRevolver could terminate their commitments to loan money to us, (iii) our secured lenders could foreclose against the assets securing the related debt, (iv) could result in cross defaults on other financing obligations or defaults in other transactional arrangements we have; and (v) we could be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation.
Despite current and anticipated debt levels, we may still be able to incur substantially more debt.
We may be able to incur substantial additional debt in the future. Although the Facility the New Term Loans and the WPG L.P. notes restrict the incurrence of additional debt, these restrictions are subject to a number of qualifications and exceptions and the additional debt incurred in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we now face would increase.

We depend on external financings for our growth and ongoing debt service requirements.
We depend on external financings, principally debt financings, to fund our acquisitions, development and other capital expenditures and to ensure that we can meet our debt service requirements. Our long-term ability to grow through acquisitions or development, which is an important component of our strategy, will be limited if we cannot obtain additional debt financing. Our access to financings depends on our credit ratings, the willingness of banks to lend to us and conditions in the capital markets. Market conditions might make it difficult to obtain debt financing, and we cannot be certain that we will be able to obtain additional debt financing or that we will be able to obtain such financing on acceptable terms.
The agreements that govern our indebtedness contain various covenants that impose restrictions on us and certain of our subsidiaries that might affect our or their ability to operate.
We have a variety of unsecured debt, including the unsecured Facility, and New Term Loans, the unsecured WPG L.P. notes, and secured property-level debt. The agreements that govern such indebtedness contain various affirmative and negative covenants that could, subject to certain significant exceptions, restrict theour ability of us and certain of our subsidiaries to, among other things, have liens on property, incur additional indebtedness, make loans, advances or other investments, make non-ordinary course asset sales, and/or merge or consolidate with any other entity or sell or convey certain assets to any one person or entity. Additionally, some of the agreements that govern the debt financing contain financial covenants that require us to maintain certain financial ratios. Our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to comply with these provisions might be affected by events beyond our control. Failure to comply with these covenants could result in an event of default, which, if not cured or waived, could accelerate our repayment obligations.
If we cannot obtain additional capital, our growth might be limited.
In order to qualify and maintain our qualification as a REIT each year, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to our shareholders. As a result, our retained earnings available to fund acquisitions, development, innovation or other capital expenditures are nominal, and we rely upon the availability of additional debt or equity capital to fund these activities. Our long-term ability to grow through acquisitions, development, innovation or strategic partnerships which is an important component of our strategy, will be limited if we cannot obtain additional debt financing or equity capital. Market conditions might make it difficult to obtain debt financing or raise equity capital, and we cannot be certain that we will be able to obtain additional debt or equity financing or that we will be able to obtain such capital on favorable terms.
Adverse changes in any credit rating might affect our borrowing capacity and borrowing terms.
Our outstanding debt is periodically rated by nationally recognized credit rating agencies. Our credit ratings impact the cost and availability of future borrowings and, accordingly, our cost of capital. Our ratings reflect each rating organization's opinion of our financial strength, operating performance and ability to meet debt obligations. We currently haveAt the end of 2018, we had investment grade credit ratings. Although we currently hold thisratings from three rating we have in the past been subjectagencies. Subsequent to downgrades.year end, two rating agencies lowered our rating below investment grade. There can be no assurance that we will achieve a particular rating or maintain a particular rating in the future. Furthermore, the interest rate under the Facility is variable and could increase in the event our credit rating is downgraded, resulting in higher borrowing costs. An increase in our cost of capital could adversely impact our ability to fund key activities related to achieving our business objectives.
We may enter into hedging interest rate protection arrangements that might not effectively limit our interest rate risk.
We may seek to selectively manage any exposure that we might have to interest rate risk through interest rate protection agreements geared toward effectively fixing or capping a portion of our variable-rate debt. Additionally, we may refinance fixed-rate debt at times when we believe rates and terms are appropriate. Any such efforts to manage these exposures might not be successful.
Our potential use of interest rate hedging arrangements to manage risk associated with interest rate volatility might expose us to additional risks, including the risk that a counterparty to a hedging arrangement fails to honor its obligations. Developing an effective interest rate risk strategy is complex and no strategy can completely insulate us from risks associated with interest rate fluctuations. There can be no assurance that hedging activities will have the desired beneficial impact on our results of

operations or financial condition. Termination of these hedging agreements typically involves costs, such as transaction fees or breakage costs.

As owners of real estate, we might face liabilities or other significant costs related to environmental issues.
Federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment might require us, as a current or previous owner or operator of real property, to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product releases at a property or at impacted neighboring properties. These laws and regulations might require us to abate or remove asbestos containing materials in the event of damage, demolition or renovation, reconstruction or expansion of a property and also govern emissions of and exposure to asbestos fibers in the air. These laws and regulations also govern the installation, maintenance and removal of underground storage tanks used to store waste oils or other petroleum products. Many of our properties contain, or at one time contained, asbestos containing materials or underground storage tanks (primarily related to auto service center establishments or emergency electrical generation equipment). The costs of investigation, removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances could be substantial and could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition. The presence of contamination, or the failure to remediate contamination, might also adversely affect our ability to sell, lease or redevelop a property or to borrow using a property as collateral.
In addition, under various federal, state or local laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real estate might be held liable to third parties for bodily injury or property damage incurred by the parties in connection with the contamination. These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or otherwise caused, the release of the hazardous or toxic substances. The presence of contamination at any of our properties, or the failure to remediate contamination discovered at such properties, could result in significant costs to us and/or materially adversely affect our ability to sell or lease such properties or to borrow using such properties as collateral.
For example, federal, state and local laws require abatement or removal of asbestos-containing materials in the event of demolition or certain renovations or remodeling, the cost of which might be substantial for certain re-developments. These regulations also govern emissions of, and exposure to, asbestos fibers in the air, which might necessitate implementation of site-specific maintenance practices. Certain laws also impose liability for the release of asbestos-containing materials into the air, and third parties might seek recovery from owners or operators of real property for personal injury or property damage associated with asbestos-containing materials. Asbestos-containing building materials are present at some of our properties and might be present at others. To minimize the risk of on-site asbestos being improperly disturbed, we have developed and implemented asbestos operations and maintenance programs to manage asbestos-containing materials and suspected asbestos-containing materials in accordance with applicable legal requirements, however we cannot be certain that our programs eliminate all risk of asbestos being improperly disturbed. Any liability, and the associated costs thereof, we might face for environmental matters could adversely impact our ability to operate our business and our financial condition.
Lastly, in connection with certain mortgages on our properties, our affiliate, Washington Prime Property, L.P., singly, or together with WPG L.P. and certain other affiliates, have executed environmental indemnification agreements to indemnify the respective lenders for those loans against losses or costs to remediate damage to the mortgaged property caused by the presence or release of hazardous materials.
We are subject to various regulatory requirements, and any changes in such requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The laws, regulations and policies governing our business, or the regulatory or enforcement environment at the national level or in any of the states in which we operate, might change at any time and could have a material adverse effect on our business. For example, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, as it is phased-in over time, might significantly impact our cost of providing employees with health care insurance. Similarly, its repeal could result in unanticipated administrative costs, disruptions and business inefficiencies that could adversely impact our business and fiscal results. We are unable to predict how this, or any other future legislative or regulatory proposals or programs will be administered or implemented, or whether any additional or similar changes to statutes or regulations, including the interpretation or implementation thereof, will occur in the future. Additionally, changes in tax laws might have a significant impact on our operating results. For more information regarding the impact of changing tax laws on our operating results, please refer to the risk factors section titled "Risks Related to OurWPG Inc.'s Status as a REIT."
Also, we may be required to expend significant sums of money to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended (“ADA”), and other federal, state, and local laws in order for our properties and facilities to meet requirements related to access and use by physically challenged persons. Additionally, unanticipated costs and expenses may be incurred in connection with defending lawsuits relating to ADA compliance not covered by our liability insurance.
Our inability to remain in compliance with regulatory requirements could have a material adverse effect on our operations and on our reputation generally. We are unable to give any assurances that applicable laws or regulations will not be amended or

construed differently, or that new laws and regulations will not be adopted, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Some of our potential losses might not be covered by insurance.
We maintain insurance coverage with financially-sound insurers for property, third-party liability, terrorism, workers compensation, and rental loss insurance on all of our properties. However, certain catastrophic perils are subject to large deductibles that may cause an adverse impact on our operating results. Additionally, there are some types of losses, including lease and other contract claims, that generally are not insured. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occurs, or a loss for which there is a large deductible occurs, we could lose all or a portion of the capital we have invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenue it could generate.
We currently maintain insurance coverage for acts of terrorism by foreign or domestic agents. The United States government provides reinsurance coverage to insurance companies following a declared terrorism event under the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act, which extended the effectiveness of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Extension Act (which we refer to as the "TRIA") of 2005. The TRIA is designed to reinsure the insurance industry from declared terrorism events that cause or create in excess of $100 million in damages or losses. The U.S. government could terminate its reinsurance of terrorism, thus increasing the risk of uninsured losses for such acts. Our tenants, vendors and joint venture partners in retail are likely subject to similar risks.
We face possible risks associated with climate change.
We cannot determine with certainty whether global warming or cooling is occurring and, if so, at what rate. To the extent climate change causes changes in weather patterns, our properties in certain markets and regions could experience increases in storm intensity and rising sea-levels. Over time, these conditions could result in volatile or decreased demand for retail space at certain of our properties or, in extreme cases, our inability to operate the properties at all. Climate change may also have indirect effects on our business by increasing the cost of (or making unavailable) insurance on favorable terms and increasing the cost of energy and snow removal at our properties. Moreover, compliance with new laws or regulations related to climate change, including compliance with "green" building codes, may require us to make improvements to our existing properties or increase taxes and fees assessed on us or our properties. At this time, there can be no assurance that climate change will not have a material adverse effect on us.
Some of our properties are subject to potential natural or other disasters.
A number of our properties are located in Florida, California, Texas, and Hawaii or in other areas with a higher risk of natural disasters such as earthquakes, fires, floods, tornadoes, hurricanes, or tsunamis. The occurrence of natural disasters can adversely impact operations, redevelopment, or development at our centers and projects, increase investment costs to repair or replace damaged properties, increase future property insurance costs, and negatively impact the tenant demand for lease space. Additionally, some of our properties are located in coastal regions, and would therefore be affected by any future increases in sea levels. If insurance is unavailable to us or is unavailable on acceptable terms, or our insurance is not adequate to cover losses from these events, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Our due diligence review of acquisition opportunities or other transactions might not identify all pertinent risks, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
Although we intend to conduct due diligence with respect to each acquisition opportunity or other transaction that we pursue, it is possible that our due diligence processes will not or did not uncover all relevant facts, particularly with respect to any assets we acquire from unaffiliated third parties. In some cases, we might be given limited access to information about the investment and will rely on information provided by the target of the investment. Additionally, if opportunities are scarce, the process for selecting bidders is competitive, or the time frame in which we are required to complete diligence is short, our ability to conduct a due diligence investigation might be limited, and we would be required to make investment decisions based upon a less thorough diligence process than would otherwise be the case. Accordingly, investments and other transactions that initially appear to be viable may prove to not be so over time, due to the limitations of the due diligence process or other factors.
Management and administrative services provided by unaffiliated persons or entities to one or more of the WPG Legacy Properties between May 28, 2014 and March 31, 2016 (the “Service Period”) may have been provided in such a manner that requires personnel of WPG (or any affiliate) to address issues, problems, or disputes that arose during the Service Period and were not addressed resulting in our expenditure of time, capital and resources to address such matters to a degree that could materially affect our business, financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.
We depended on unaffiliated persons or entities to provide certain services in connection with their operation and management of the WPG Legacy Properties during the Service Period. These services included, but were not limited to, promoting the respective property through advertisements, leasing the WPG Legacy Properties, billing tenants for rent and all other charges, paying the

salaries of persons responsible for management of the WPG Legacy Properties, making such infrastructure repairs as approved in the fiscal budget for the WPG Legacy Properties, maintenance and payment of any taxes or fees.

In the event there were isolated or perhaps even systemic instances of the aforementioned services being provided in a manner inconsistent with WPG’s current business practices, philosophy or standards due to the inattention, underperformance, mismanagement, or deficit service, WPG personnel would, upon assuming management and operational control of the WPG Legacy Properties, which we did by March 31, 2016, have to address one or more issues, problems, or disputes that arose during the Service Period and were not addressed resulting in our expenditure of time, capital and resources to resolve such matters to a degree that could materially affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations as well as the optimal operation of one or more of the WPG Legacy Properties.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to continue paying distributions at the current rate.
We have maintained a policy to pay a quarterly cash distribution at an annualized rate of $1.00 per common share/unit and intend to pay the same distribution going forward. However, holders of our common shares/units may not receive the same quarterly distributions for various reasons, including the following:
We may not have enough cash to pay such distributions due to changes in our cash requirements, indebtedness, capital spending plans, cash flows or financial position;
Decisions on whether, when and in what amounts to make any future distributions will remain at all times entirely at the discretion of WPG Inc.'s Board of Directors, which reserves the right to change dividend practices at any time and for any reason;
We may desire to retain cash to maintain or improve our credit ratings or to address costs related to implementing our growth strategy or executing on our operational strategy; and
The ability of our subsidiaries to make distributions to us may be subject to restrictions imposed by law, regulation or the terms of any current or future indebtedness that these subsidiaries may incur.
Our shareholders/unitholders have no contractual or other legal right to distributions that have not been declared.
Risks associated with the implementation of new information systems or upgrades to existing systems may interfere with our operations or ability to maintain adequate records.
We are continuing to implement new information systems and upgrades to existing systems as part of our growing business and problems with the design as well as the security or implementation of these new or upgraded systems could interfere with our operations or ability to maintain adequate and secure records.
The occurrence of cyber incidents, a deficiency in our cyber security, or a data breach could negatively impact our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information, and/or damage to our business relationships, all of which could negatively impact our financial results.
A cyber incident is considered to be any adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of our information resources. More specifically, a cyber-incident is an intentional attack or an unintentional event that can include gaining unauthorized access to systems to disrupt operations, corrupting data, or stealing confidential information. We rely upon information technology networks and systems, some of which are managed by third-parties, to process, transmit, and store electronic information, some of which may be confidential and/or proprietary, and to manage or support a variety of business processes and activities. As our reliance on technology has increased, so have the risks posed to our systems, both internal and those we have outsourced. Primary risks that could directly result from the occurrence of a cyber-incident include, but are not limited to, operational interruption, damage to our relationship with our tenants and other business partners, and private data exposure (including personally identifiable information, or proprietary and confidential information, of ours and our employees, as well as third parties). Any such incidents could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability or regulatory penalties under laws protecting the privacy of personal information, and reduce the benefits of our advanced technologies. We carry cyber liability insurance; however a loss could exceed the limits of the policy. We have implemented processes, procedures and controls to help mitigate these risks, butsuch as providing security awareness training with simulated spam, phishing and social engineering attacks for associates. We perform mock incident and mock disasters to test the adequacy of our internal incident response plan and that our associates are properly prepared.  We leverage a third party security firm to perform risk assessments. However, these measures, our increased awareness of a risk of a cyber-incident, and our insurance coverage, do not guarantee that our financial results will not be negatively impacted by such an incident.

Failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could have a material adverse effect on our business and WPG Inc.'s share price.
As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Dodd-Frank Act and are required to prepare our financial statements according to the rules and regulations required by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Additionally, the Exchange Act requires that we file annual, quarterly and current reports. Our failure to prepare and disclose this information in a timely manner or to otherwise comply with applicable law could subject us to penalties under federal securities laws, expose us to lawsuits and restrict our ability to access financing.
In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal controls and procedures for financial reporting and disclosure purposes. Internal control over financial reporting is complex and may be revised over time to adapt to changes in our business, or changes in applicable accounting rules. We cannot assure you that our internal control over financial reporting will be effective in the future or that a material weakness will not be discovered with respect to a prior period for which we had previously believed that internal controls were effective. If we are not able to maintain or document effective internal control over financial reporting, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be able to certify as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in future reports, when such certifications will be required.
Matters impacting our internal controls may cause us to be unable to report our financial information on a timely basis, or may cause our company to restate previously issued financial information, and thereby subject us to adverse regulatory consequences, including sanctions or investigations by the SEC, or violations of applicable stock exchange listing rules. There could also be a negative reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of investor confidence in our company and the reliability of our financial statements. Confidence in the reliability of our financial statements is also likely to suffer if we or our independent registered public accounting firm report a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting or if the firm resigns in light of such a weakness. This could materially adversely affect our company by, for example, leading to a decline in WPG Inc.'s share price and impairing our ability to raise additional capital.
Risks Related to the Separation from SPG
Potential indemnification liabilities to SPG pursuant to the Separation Agreement could materially adversely affect our operations.
The Separation Agreement with SPG provides for, among other things, the principal corporate transactions required to effect the separation, certain conditions to the separation and distribution and provisions governing our relationship with SPG with respect to and following the separation and distribution. Among other things, the Separation Agreement provides for indemnification obligations designed to make us financially responsible for substantially all liabilities that may exist relating to our business activities, whether incurred prior to or after the separation and distribution, as well as those obligations of SPG that we will assume pursuant to the Separation Agreement. If we are required to indemnify SPG under the circumstances set forth in this agreement, we may be subject to substantial liabilities.
In connection with the separation from SPG, some WPG Inc. executive officers and members of senior management have actual or potential conflicts of interest because of their previous or continuing equity interest in, or positions at, SPG.
Some WPG Inc. executive officers and members of senior management are persons who have been employees of SPG or one of its affiliates. Because of their former positions with SPG, some WPG Inc. executive officers and members of senior management own SPG common stock or other equity awards. Since the separation, some WPG Inc. executive officers and members of senior management continue to have a financial interest in SPG common stock. Continued ownership of SPG common stock could create, or appear to create, potential conflicts of interest.
In connection with our separation from SPG, SPG will indemnify us for certain pre-distribution liabilities and liabilities related to SPG assets. However, there can be no assurance that these indemnities will be sufficient to insure us against the full amount of such liabilities, or that SPG's ability to satisfy its indemnification obligation will not be impaired in the future.
Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, SPG has agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities. However, third parties could seek to hold us responsible for any of the liabilities that SPG agrees to retain, and there can be no assurance that SPG will be able to fully satisfy its indemnification obligations. Moreover, even if we ultimately succeed in recovering from SPG any amounts for which we are held liable, such indemnification may be insufficient to fully offset the financial impact of such liabilities and/or we may be temporarily required to bear these losses while seeking recovery from SPG.

We have a limited history operating as an independent company, and our historical financial information is not necessarily representative of the results that we would have achieved as a separate, publicly traded company and may not be a reliable indicator of our future results.
The historical information about us in this Form 10-K prior to May 28, 2014 is derived from the historical accounting records of SPG and refers to our business as operated by and integrated with SPG. Some of our historical financial information included in this annual report is derived from the consolidated financial statements and accounting records of SPG. Accordingly, the historical and financial information does not necessarily reflect the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows that we would have achieved as a separate, publicly traded company during the periods presented or those that we will achieve in the future. Factors which could cause our results to differ from those reflected in such historical financial information and which may adversely impact our ability to receive similar results in the future include, but are not limited to, the following:

Prior to the separation, a portion of our current business had been operated by SPG as part of its broader corporate organization, rather than as an independent, stand-alone company. SPG or one of its affiliates performed various corporate functions for us, such as accounting, property management, information technology, legal, and finance. Following the separation, SPG provided some of these functions to us. Our historical financial results for periods prior to the separation from SPG reflect allocations of corporate expenses from SPG for such functions and are likely to be less than the expenses we would have incurred had we operated as a separate, publicly traded company. We have and will continue to make significant investments to replicate or outsource from other providers certain facilities, systems, infrastructure, and personnel to which we no longer have access after our separation from SPG. Developing our ability to operate without access to SPG's current operational and administrative infrastructure has been challenging;
During the time our business was integrated with the other businesses of SPG, we were able to use SPG's size and purchasing power in procuring various goods and services and shared economies of scope and scale in costs, employees, vendor relationships and customer relationships. For example, we were historically able to take advantage of SPG's purchasing power in technology and services, including information technology, marketing, insurance, treasury services, property support and the procurement of goods. We entered into certain transition and other separation-related agreements with SPG, however these agreements have either expired or been terminated and we may not continue to fully capture the benefits we enjoyed as a result of being integrated with SPG and might result in us paying higher charges than in the past for these services. As a separate, independent company, we may be unable to on a consistent, sustainable and long-term basis obtain goods and services at the prices and terms obtained prior to the separation, which could decrease our overall profitability. As a separate, independent company, we may also not be as successful on a consistent, sustainable and long-term basis in negotiating favorable tax treatments and credits with governmental entities. Likewise, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain desired tenants on a consistent, sustainable and long-term basis. This could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition following the completion of the separation;
Before the separation, generally our working capital requirements and capital for our general corporate purposes, including acquisitions, research and development, and capital expenditures, were historically satisfied as part of SPG's cash management policies. Since the separation, we have been and may continue to be required to obtain additional financing from banks, through public offerings or private placements of debt or equity securities, strategic relationships or other arrangements, which might not be on terms as favorable to those obtained by SPG, and the cost of capital for our business may be higher than SPG's cost of capital prior to the separation; and
As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Dodd-Frank Act and are required to prepare our financial statements according to the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC. Complying with these requirements could result in significant costs to us and require us to divert substantial resources, including management time, from other activities.
Other significant changes have occurred and may continue to occur in our cost structure, management, strategic transactions, financing and business operations as a result of operating as an independent company. For additional information about the past financial performance of our business and the basis of presentation of the historical combined financial statements of our business, please refer to "Selected Financial Data," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the historical financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

Risks Related to WPG Inc.'s Status as a REIT
If WPG Inc. fails to remain qualified as a REIT, it will be subject to U.S. federal income tax as a regular corporation and could face substantial tax liability, which would substantially reduce funds available for distribution to its shareholders and result in other negative consequences.
If WPG Inc. were to fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it would be subject to U.S. federal income tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on its taxable income at regular corporate rates, and distributions to its shareholders would not be deductible by WPG Inc. in computing its taxable income. Any such corporate tax liability could be substantial and would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to WPG Inc.'s shareholders, which in turn could have an adverse effect on the value of, and trading prices for, WPG Inc.'s common shares. Unless WPG Inc. is deemed to be entitled to relief under certain provisions of the Code, it would also be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which it initially ceased to qualify as a REIT.
Furthermore, the NYSENew York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") requires, as a condition to the listing of WPG Inc.'s common shares, that WPG Inc. maintain its REIT status. Consequently, if WPG Inc. fails to maintain its REIT status, its common shares could promptly be delisted from the NYSE, which would decrease the trading activity of such common shares, making the sale of such common shares difficult.

Dividends paid by REITs do not qualify for the reduced tax rates available for some dividends.
Dividends paid by certain non-REIT corporations to their shareholders that are individuals, trusts and estates are generally taxed at reduced tax rates. Dividends payable by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for the reduced rates. The more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate dividends could cause investors who are individuals, trusts and estates to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the shares of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the shares of REITs, including WPG Inc.'s common shares.
Qualifying as a REIT involves highly technical and complex provisions of the Code.
Qualifying as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Code for which only limited judicial and administrative authorities exist. Even a technical or inadvertent violation could jeopardize WPG Inc.'s REIT qualification. WPG Inc.'s qualification as a REIT will depend on WPG Inc.'s satisfaction of certain asset, income, organizational, distribution, shareholder ownership and other requirements on a continuing basis. Compliance with these requirements must be carefully monitored on a continuing basis, and there can be no assurance that WPG Inc.'s personnel responsible for doing so will be able to successfully monitor WPG Inc.'s compliance, despite clauses in the property management agreements requiring such monitoring. Additionally, WPG Inc.'s ability to satisfy the requirements to qualify to be taxed as a REIT might depend, in part, on the actions of third parties over which we have either no control or only limited influence.
Monitoring REIT qualification for both WPG Inc. as well as the separate individual REITs within joint venture arrangements adds compliance complexity.
REIT compliance is required to be tested for WPG Inc. as well as any subsidiary REIT within our structure. Each REIT’s compliance is tested and determined separately. Therefore the subsidiary REITs have a lower materiality threshold. If one of the subsidiary REITs failed to be REIT compliant it may impact the REIT status of WPG Inc.
Legislative, administrative, regulatory or other actions affecting REITs, including positions taken by the IRS, could have a negative effect on WPG Inc.
The rules dealing with U.S. federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process, and by the IRS and the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the "Treasury"). ChangesAlthough we are not aware of any provision of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the tax reform legislation enacted in 2017, or any pending tax legislation that would adversely affect our ability to operate as a REIT, changes to the tax laws or interpretations thereof by the IRS and the Treasury, with or without retroactive application, could materially and adversely affect WPG Inc.'s investors or WPG Inc. WPG Inc. cannot predict how changes in the tax laws might affect its investors or WPG Inc. New legislation, Treasury regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantly and negatively affect WPG Inc.'s ability to qualify to be taxed as a REIT and/or the U.S. federal income tax consequences to WPG Inc.'s investors and WPG Inc. of such qualification.
Legislative or regulatory action could adversely affect stockholders.
Future changes to tax laws may adversely affect the taxation of the REIT, its subsidiaries or its stockholders. These changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in our shares or on the market value or the resale potential of our assets. These potential changes could generally result in REITs having fewer tax advantages, and may lead REITs to determine that it would be more advantageous to elect to be taxed, for federal income tax purposes, as a corporation.

Not all states automatically conform to changes in the Internal Revenue Code. Some states use the legislative process to decide whether it is in their best interests to conform or not to various provisions of the Code. This could increase the complexity of our compliance efforts, increase compliance costs, and may subject us to additional taxes and audit risk.
WPG Inc.'s REIT distribution requirements could adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to execute our business plan.
In order for WPG Inc. to qualify to be taxed as a REIT, and assuming that certain other requirements are also satisfied, it generally must distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains, to its shareholders each year, so that U.S. federal corporate income tax does not apply to earnings that it distributes. To the extent that WPG Inc. satisfies this distribution requirement and qualifies for taxation as a REIT, but distributes less than 100% of its REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and including any net capital gains, it will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on its undistributed net taxable income. Additionally, WPG Inc. will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax if the actual amount that it distributes to its shareholders in a calendar year is less than a minimum amount specified under U.S. federal income tax laws. WPG Inc. intends to make distributions to its shareholders to comply with the REIT requirements of the Code.

From time to time, WPG Inc. might generate taxable income greater than its cash flow as a result of differences in timing between the recognition of taxable income and the actual receipt of cash or the effect of nondeductible capital expenditures, the creation of reserves, or required debt or amortization payments. If we do not have other funds available in these situations, we could be required to borrow funds on unfavorable terms, sell assets at disadvantageous prices, distribute amounts that would otherwise be invested in future acquisitions, capital expenditures or repayment of debt, or make taxable distributions of WPG Inc.'s capital stock or debt securities to make distributions sufficient to enable WPG Inc. to pay out enough of its taxable income to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement and avoid corporate income tax and the 4% excise tax in a particular year. These alternatives could increase our costs or reduce our equity. Further, amounts distributed will not be available to fund investment activities.the growth of our business. Thus, compliance with WPG Inc.'s REIT requirements may hinder our ability to grow, which could adversely affect the value of WPG Inc.'s shares. Any restrictions onour liquidity and our ability to incur additional indebtedness or make certain distributions could preclude WPG Inc. from meeting the 90% distribution requirement. Decreases in funds from operations due to unfinanced expenditures for acquisitions of properties or increases in the number of shares outstanding without commensurate increases in funds from operations each would adversely affect WPG Inc.'s ability to maintain distributions to its shareholders. Consequently, there can be no assurance that WPG Inc. will be able to make distributions at the anticipated distribution rate or any other rate.execute our business plan.
Even if WPG Inc. remains qualified as a REIT, it could face other tax liabilities that reduce its cash flows.
Even if WPG Inc. remains qualified for taxation as a REIT, it could be subject to certain U.S. federal, state and local taxes on its income and assets, including taxes on any undistributed income and state or local income, property and transfer taxes. For example, in order to meet the REIT qualification requirements, WPG Inc. may hold some of its assets or conduct certain of its activities through one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries ("TRSs") or other subsidiary corporations that will be subject to federal, state and local corporate-level income taxes as regular C corporations. Additionally, WPG Inc. might incur a 100% excise tax on transactions with a TRS if they are not conducted on an arm's-length basis. Any of these taxes would decrease cash available for distribution to WPG Inc.'s shareholders.
Complying with WPG Inc.'s REIT requirements might cause us to forego otherwise attractive acquisition opportunities or liquidate otherwise attractive investments.
To qualify to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, WPG Inc. must ensure that, at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of its assets consist of cash, cash items, government securities and "real estate assets" (as defined in the Code), including certain mortgage loans and securities. The remainder of WPG Inc.'s investments (other than government securities, qualified real estate assets and securities issued by a TRS) generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer.
Additionally, in general, no more than 5% of the value of WPG Inc.'s total assets (other than government securities, qualified real estate assets and securities issued by a TRS) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, and no more than 25% (20% as of January 1, 2018)20% of the value of our total assets can be represented by securities of one or more TRSs. If WPG Inc. fails to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, it must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing its REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we might be required to liquidate or forego otherwise attractive investments. These actions could have the effect of reducing WPG Inc.'s income and amounts available for distribution to its shareholders.
In addition to the asset tests set forth above, to qualify to be taxed as a REIT, WPG Inc. must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of its income, the amounts it distributes to its shareholders and the ownership of its shares. We might be unable to pursue investments that would be otherwise advantageous to us in order to satisfy the source-of-

incomesource-of-income or asset-diversification requirements of WPG Inc. for qualifying as a REIT. Thus, compliance with WPG Inc.'s REIT requirements may hinder our ability to make certain attractive investments.
Complying with WPG Inc.'s REIT requirements might limit our ability to hedge effectively and may cause WPG Inc. to incur tax liabilities.
The REIT provisions of the Code to which WPG Inc. must adhere substantially limit our ability to hedge our assets and liabilities. Income from certain potential hedging transactions that we may enter into to manage risk of interest rate changes with respect to borrowings made or to be made to acquire or carry real estate assets or from transactions to manage risk of currency fluctuations with respect to any item of income or gain that satisfy WPG Inc.'s REIT gross income tests (including gain from the termination of such a transaction) does not constitute "gross income" for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income tests that apply to REITs, provided that certain identification requirements are met. To the extent that we enter into other types of hedging transactions or fail to properly identify such transaction as a hedge, the income is likely to be treated as non-qualifying income for purposes of both of WPG Inc.'s gross income tests.
As a result of these rules, we might be required to limit our use of advantageous hedging techniques or implement those hedges through a total return swap. This could increase the cost of our hedging activities because the total return swap may be subject to tax on gains or expose us to greater risks associated with changes in interest rates than we would otherwise want to bear.
Additionally, losses in the total return swap will generally not provide any tax benefit, except that such losses could theoretically be carried back or forward against WPG Inc.'s past or future taxable income in the total return swap.

The share ownership limit imposed by the Code for REITs, and WPG Inc.'s amended and restated articles of incorporation, may inhibit market activity in WPG Inc.'s shares and restrict our business combination opportunities.
In order for WPG Inc. to maintain its qualification as a REIT under the Code, not more than 50% in value of its outstanding shares may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code to include certain entities) at any time during the last half of each taxable year after its first taxable year. WPG Inc.'s amended and restated articles of incorporation, with certain exceptions, authorize its Board of Directors to take the actions that are necessary and desirable to preserve its qualification as a REIT. Unless exempted by WPG Inc.'s Board of Directors, no person may own more than 8%, or 18% in the case of certain family members and other related persons of Mr. David Simon, the current Chairman and CEO of SPG and former member of our Board of Directors, of any class of WPG Inc.'s capital stock or any combination thereof, determined by the number of shares outstanding, voting power or value (as determined by WPG Inc.'s Board of Directors), whichever produces the smallest holding of capital stock under the three methods, computed with regard to all outstanding shares of capital stock and, to the extent provided by the Code, all shares of WPG Inc.'s capital stock issuable under outstanding options and exchange rights that have not been exercised. WPG Inc.'s Board of Directors may grant an exemption in its sole discretion, subject to such conditions, representations and undertakings as it may determine in its sole discretion. These ownership limits could delay or prevent a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for WPG Inc.'s common shares or otherwise be in the best interest of WPG Inc.'s shareholders.
Risks Related to Our Common and Preferred Shares/Units
We cannot guarantee the timing, amount, or payment of distributions on our common shares/units.
Although we expect to pay regular cash distributions, the timing, declaration, amount and payment of future distributions to shareholders will fall within the discretion of our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors' decisions regarding the payment of distributions will depend on many factors, such as our financial condition, earnings, capital requirements, debt service obligations, limitations under our financing arrangements, industry practice, legal requirements, regulatory constraints, and other factors that it deems relevant. Our ability to pay distributions will depend on our ongoing ability to generate cash from operations and access capital markets. We cannot guarantee that we will pay a distribution in the future or continue to pay any distribution if we commence paying distributions. For more information, please refer to the risk factor titled "We cannot assure you that we will be able to continue paying distributions at the currenta particular rate."

The market value or trading price of our preferred and Common Shares could decrease based upon uncertainty in the marketplace and market perception.
The market price of our common and preferred shares may fluctuate widely as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside our control or influence. Additionally, the stock market is subject to fluctuations in share prices and trading volumes that affect the market prices of the shares of many companies. These broad market fluctuations have adversely affected and may continue to adversely affect the market price of our common and preferred shares. Among the factors that could adversely affect the market price of our common and preferred shares are:
actual or anticipated quarterly fluctuations in our operating results and financial condition;
changes in our FFO, revenue, or earnings estimates or publication of research reports and recommendations by financial analysts or actions taken by rating agencies with respect to our securities or those of other REITs;
negative speculation or information in the media or investment community;
any changes in our distribution or dividend policy;
any sale or disposal of properties within our portfolio;
any future issuances of equity securities;
increases in leverage, mortgage debt financing, or outstanding borrowings;
strategic actions by our Company or our competitors, such as acquisitions, joint ventures, or restructurings;
general market conditions and, in particular, developments related to market conditions for the real estate industry;industry or retail sector;
proposed or adopted regulatory or legislative changes or developments; or
anticipated or pending investigations, proceedings, or litigation that involves or affect us.

WPG Inc.'s cash available for distribution to shareholders might be insufficient to pay distributions at any particular levels or in amounts sufficient in order for WPG Inc. to maintain its REIT qualification, which could require us to borrow funds in order to make such distributions.
As a REIT, WPG Inc. is required to distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income each year, excluding net capital gains, to its shareholders. WPG Inc. intends to make regular quarterly distributions whereby it expects to distribute at least 100% of its REIT taxable income to its shareholders out of assets legally available thereof. Based on the amount of its REIT taxable income for the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, WPG Inc.'s annual dividend of $1.00 per share satisfied this requirement. However, WPG Inc.'s ability to make distributions could be adversely affected by various factors, many of which are not within its control. For example, in the event of downturns in its financial condition or operating results, economic conditions or otherwise, WPG Inc. might be unable to declare or pay distributions to its shareholders to the extent required to maintain its REIT qualification. WPG Inc. might be required either to fund distributions from borrowings under the Revolver or to reduce its distributions. If we borrow to fund WPG Inc.'s distributions, our interest costs could increase, thereby reducing our earnings and cash available for distribution from what they otherwise would have been.
In addition, some of WPG Inc.'s distributions may include a return of capital. To the extent that WPG Inc. makes distributions in excess of its current and accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes), such distributions would generally be considered a return of capital for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent of the holder's adjusted tax basis in its shares. A return of capital is not taxable, but it has the effect of reducing the holder's adjusted tax basis in its investment. To the extent that distributions exceed the adjusted tax basis of a holder's shares, the distributions will be treated as gain from the sale or exchange of such shares.
Your percentage of ownership in WPG Inc. may be diluted in the future.
In the future, your percentage ownership in us may be diluted because of equity issuances for acquisitions, capital market transactions or otherwise. WPG Inc. also regularly grants compensatory equity awards to directors, executive officers employees, advisors, and consultantscertain employees who are eligible to receive such awards. Such awards, which are derivatives of our common shares, will ultimately, if they vest, have a dilutive effect on WPG Inc.'s earnings per share, which could adversely affect the market price of WPG Inc.'s common shares.
In addition, WPG Inc.'s amended and restated articles of incorporation authorize WPG Inc. to issue, without the approval of its shareholders, one or more additional classes or series of preferred shares having such designation, powers, preferences and relative, participating, optional and other special rights, including preferences over our common shares respecting dividends and distributions, as WPG Inc.'s Board of Directors generally may determine.
The terms of one or more such classes or series of

preferred shares could dilute the voting power or reduce the value of WPG Inc.'s common shares. For example, WPG Inc. could grant the holders of preferred shares the right to elect some number of WPG Inc. directors in all events or on the occurrence of specified events, or the right to veto specified transactions. Similarly, the repurchase or redemption rights or liquidation preferences we could assign to holders of preferred shares could affect the residual value of the common shares.
Certain provisions in WPG Inc.'s amended and restated articles of incorporation and bylaws, and provisions of Indiana law, might prevent or delay an acquisition of our company, which could decrease the trading price of WPG Inc.'s common shares.
WPG Inc.'s amended and restated articles of incorporation and bylaws contain, and Indiana law contains, provisions that are intended to deter coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids by making such practices or bids unacceptably expensive to the bidder and to encourage prospective acquirers to negotiate with WPG Inc.'s Board of Directors rather than to attempt a hostile takeover. These provisions include, among others:
The inability of WPG Inc.'s shareholders to call a special meeting;
Restrictions on the ability of WPG Inc.'s shareholders to act by written consent without a meeting;
Advance notice requirements and other limitations on the ability of shareholders to present proposals or nominate directors for election at shareholder meetings;
The right of WPG Inc.'s Board of Directors to issue preferred shares without shareholder approval;
Limitations on the ability of WPG Inc.'s shareholders to remove directors;
The ability of WPG Inc.'s directors, and not shareholders, to fill vacancies on WPG Inc.'s Board of Directors;
Restrictions on the number of shares of capital stock that individual shareholders may own;
Supermajority vote requirements for shareholders to amend certain provisions of WPG Inc.'s amended and restated articles of incorporation and bylaws;
Limitations on the exercise of voting rights in respect of any "control shares" acquired in a control share acquisition, which WPG Inc. has currently opted out of in WPG Inc.'s amended and restated bylaws but which could apply to WPG Inc. in the future; and

Restrictions on an "interested shareholder" to engage in certain business combinations with WPG Inc. for a five-year period following the date the interestinterested shareholder became such.
We believe these provisions will protect WPG Inc.'s shareholders from coercive or otherwise unfair takeover tactics by requiring potential acquirers to negotiate with WPG Inc.'s Board of Directors and by providing WPG Inc.'s Board of Directors with more time to assess any acquisition proposal. These provisions are not intended to make the company immune from takeovers. However, these provisions will apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some shareholders and could delay or prevent an acquisition that WPG Inc.'s Board of Directors determines is not in the best interests of WPG Inc. and its shareholders. These provisions may also prevent or discourage attempts to remove and replace incumbent directors.
Several of the agreements that we entered into with SPG in connection with the separation require SPG's consent to any assignment by us of our rights and obligations under the agreements, but these agreements generally expireexpired within two years of May 28, 2014, except for certain agreements that will continue for longer terms. These agreements include the Separation Agreement and the Tax Matters Agreement. The consent and termination rights set forth in these agreements might discourage, delay or prevent a change of controlstrategic transaction that you may consider favorable.
In addition, an acquisition or further issuance of WPG Inc.'s common shares could trigger the application of Section 355(e) of the Code. Under the tax related agreement(s) we had with SPG following the separation, we would be required to indemnify SPG for any resulting taxes and related amounts, and this indemnity obligation might discourage, delay or prevent a change of controlstrategic transaction that you may consider favorable.

Certain provisions in WPG L.P.'s amended and restated limited partnership agreement may limit our ability to execute transactions that our shareholders may consider favorable.
WPG L.P.'s amended and restated limited partnership agreement, as amended (the "Partnership Agreement") provides that we must obtain the approval of a majority of the units of limited partnership interest held by limited partners in order to merge or consolidate WPG L.P. or voluntarily sell or otherwise transfer all or substantially all of the assets of WPG L.P. In addition, during all periods in which Melvin Simon, Herbert Simon and David Simon and members of their immediate families (and including their lineal descendants, trusts established for their benefit and entities controlled by them), collectively, hold at least 10% of the partnership units in WPG L.P., the Partnership Agreement requires that WPG L.P. obtain the consent of the Simons holding more than 50% of the partnership units then held by the Simons prior to, among other things, selling, exchanging, transferring or otherwise disposing of all or substantially all of the assets of WPG L.P. David Simon (or such other person as may be designated by the holders of more than 50% of the partnership units held by the Simons) has been granted authority by those limited partners who are Simons to grant and withhold consent on behalf of the Simons whenever such consent of the Simons is required. Because WPG L.P.'s assets comprise substantially all of our assets, these restrictions could limit our ability to sell or transfer all or substantially all of our assets, or impact the manner in which we do so, even if some of our shareholders believe that doing so would be in our and their best interests.
WPG Inc.'s substantial shareholders may exert influence over our company that may be adverse to our best interests and those of WPG Inc.'s other shareholders.
Following the separation and distribution, we expect that aA substantial portion of WPG Inc.'s outstanding common shares will beare held by a relatively small group of shareholders. This concentration of ownership may make some transactions more difficult or impossible without the support of some or all of these shareholders. For example, the concentration of ownership held by the substantial shareholders, even if they are not acting in a coordinated manner, could allow them to influence our policies and strategy and could delay, defer or prevent a change of control or impede a merger, takeover or other business combination that may otherwise be favorable to us and our other shareholders. Additionally, the interests of any of WPG Inc.'s substantial shareholders, or any of their respective affiliates, could conflict with or differ from the interests of WPG Inc.'s other shareholders or the other substantial shareholders. A substantial shareholder or affiliate thereof may also pursue acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to our business, and as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us.
Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments
None.

Item 2.    Properties
As of December 31, 2016,2018, our portfolio of properties consisted of material interests in 114108 properties totaling approximately 6358 million square feet of gross leasable area.managed GLA. We also own parcels of land which can be used for either thenew development of new shopping centers or the expansion of existing properties. While most of these properties are wholly owned by us, several are less than wholly owned through joint ventures and other arrangements with third parties, which is common in the real estate industry. As of December 31, 2016,2018, our properties had an ending occupancy rate of 93.5%93.7% (based on the measures described in note (2) to the table that follows).
Our properties are leased to a variety of tenants across the retail spectrum including anchor stores, big-box tenants, national inline tenants, sit-down restaurants, movie theatres,theaters, and regional and local retailers. As of December 31, 2016,2018, selected anchors and tenants include Macy's, Inc., Dillard's, Inc., J.C. Penney Co., Inc., Sears Holdings Corporation, Target Corporation, The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc., Kohl's Corporation, Dick's Sporting Goods, Best Buy Co., Inc., Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. and TJX Companies, Inc. With respect to all tenants in our portfolio, no single tenant was responsible for more than 3.2%3.0% of our total base minimum rental revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. Further, no single property accounted for more than 4.2%5.1%, of our total base minimum rental revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. Finally, as of December 31, 2016,2018, no more than 12.7%14.5% of our total gross annual base minimum rental revenues was derived from leases that expire in any single calendar year. Capitalized terms not defined in this Item 2 shall have the definition ascribed to these terms in Item 1 of this Form 10-K.
The following table summarizes certain data for our portfolio of properties as of December 31, 2016:2018:
Property Information
As of December 31, 20162018
Property Name State City (Major Metropolitan Area) Ownership
Interest
(Expiration
if Lease)
 Financial
Interest (1)
 Year
Acquired
or Built
 Occupancy (%)(2)  Total
Center
SF
 Anchors State City (Major Metropolitan Area) Ownership
Interest
(Expiration
if Lease)
 Financial
Interest (1)
 Year
Acquired
or Built
 Occupancy (%)(2)  Total
Center
SF
 Anchors
Enclosed Retail PropertiesEnclosed Retail Properties         Enclosed Retail Properties         
Anderson Mall SC Anderson Fee 100.0% Built 1972 78.6% 670,031
 Belk, Books-A-Million, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears SC Anderson Fee 100.0% Built 1972 85.2% 670,772
 Belk(10), Books-A-Million, Dillard's(10), JCPenney
Arbor Hills MI Ann Arbor Fee 95.3% Acquired 2015 96.3% 87,395
 N/A MI Ann Arbor Fee 51.0% Acquired 2015 100.0% 87,487
 N/A
Arboretum, The TX Austin Fee 100.0% Acquired 1998 87.5% 199,510
 Barnes & Noble, Cheesecake Factory, Pottery Barn TX Austin Fee 51.0% Acquired 1998 92.5% 195,331
 Barnes & Noble, Cheesecake Factory, Pottery Barn
Ashland Town Center KY Ashland Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 99.4% 433,769
 Belk, Belk Home Store, JCPenney, T.J. Maxx KY Ashland Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 97.9% 437,284
 Belk, Belk Home Store, JCPenney(10), T.J. Maxx
Bowie Town Center MD Bowie (Wash, D.C.) Fee 100.0% Built 2001 97.4% 571,832
 Barnes & Noble, Best Buy, L.A. Fitness, Macy's, Off Broadway Shoes, Sears(14) MD Bowie (Wash, D.C.) Fee 100.0% Built 2001 92.5% 571,483
 Barnes & Noble, Best Buy(10), L.A. Fitness, Macy's(10), Off Broadway Shoes, Sears(5)(8)
Boynton Beach Mall FL Boynton Beach (Miami) Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 81.2% 1,101,881
 Cinemark Theatres, Dillard's(10), JCPenney, Macy's(10), Sears(5), You Fit Health Clubs
Brunswick Square NJ East Brunswick (New York) Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 97.5% 760,998
 Barnes & Noble, JCPenney(10), Macy's(10), Starplex Luxury Cinema
Charlottesville Fashion Square VA Charlottesville Ground Lease (2076) 100.0% Acquired 1997 87.5% 578,063
 Belk(4), JCPenney(10) Sears(5)
Chautauqua Mall NY Lakewood Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 87.3% 432,931
 JCPenney, Office Max, Sears(5)
Chesapeake Square Theater VA Chesapeake (VA Beach) Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 100.0% 42,248
 Cinemark Theatres
Clay Terrace IN Carmel (Indianapolis) Fee 100.0% Acquired 2014 92.6% 577,601
 Dick's Sporting Goods, DSW, Pier 1, St. Vincent's Sports Performance, Whole Foods
Cottonwood Mall NM Albuquerque Fee 100.0% Built 1996 89.6% 1,051,847
 Conn's Electronic & Appliance(10), Dillard's(10), HiLife Furniture, Hobby Lobby, JCPenney(10), Regal Cinema

Property Name State City (Major Metropolitan Area) Ownership
Interest
(Expiration
if Lease)
 Financial
Interest (1)
 Year
Acquired
or Built
 Occupancy (%)(2)  Total
Center
SF
 Anchors State City (Major Metropolitan Area) Ownership
Interest
(Expiration
if Lease)
 Financial
Interest (1)
 Year
Acquired
or Built
 Occupancy (%)(2)  Total
Center
SF
 Anchors
Boynton Beach Mall FL Boynton Beach (Miami) Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 91.2% 1,101,994
 Cinemark Theatres, Dillard's, JCPenney, Macy's, Sears, You Fit Health Clubs
Brunswick Square NJ East Brunswick (New York) Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 98.0% 759,537
 Barnes & Noble, JCPenney, Macy's, Starplex Luxury Cinema
Charlottesville Fashion Square VA Charlottesville Ground Lease (2076) 100.0% Acquired 1997 87.0% 578,093
 Belk(8), JCPenney, Sears
Chautauqua Mall NY Lakewood Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 93.0% 427,826
 Bon Ton, JCPenney, Office Max, Sears
Chesapeake Square Theater VA Chesapeake (VA Beach) Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 100.0% 42,248
 Cinemark Theatres
Clay Terrace IN Carmel (Indianapolis) Fee 100.0% Acquired 2014 89.5% 576,294
 Dick's Sporting Goods, DSW, Pier 1, St. Vincent's Sports Performance, Whole Foods
Colonial Park Mall PA Harrisburg Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 90.6% 738,966
 Bon-Ton, Boscov's, Sears
Cottonwood Mall NM Albuquerque Fee 100.0% Built 1996 95.6% 1,051,318
 Conn's Electronic & Appliance, Dillard's, JCPenney, Macy's (9), Regal Cinema, Sears
Dayton Mall OH Dayton Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 99.7% 1,442,979
 Dick's Sporting Goods, DSW, Elder-Beerman, H.H. Gregg, JCPenney, Macy's, Sears(14) OH Dayton Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 96.4% 1,443,039
 Dick's Sporting Goods, DSW, JCPenney, Macy's(10)
Edison Mall FL Fort Myers Fee 100.0% Acquired 1997 90.5% 1,055,036
 Books-A-Million, Dillard's, JCPenney, Macy's(8), Sears(14) FL Fort Myers Fee 100.0% Acquired 1997 95.2% 1,039,126
 Books-A-Million, Dillard's(10), JCPenney, Macy's(4), Sears(8)
Grand Central Mall WV Parkersburg Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 88.7% 848,240
 Belk, Dunham's Sports, Elder-Beerman, JCPenney, Regal Cinemas, Sears WV Parkersburg Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 91.6% 758,513
 Belk, Dunham's Sports, JCPenney, Regal Cinemas
Great Lakes Mall OH Mentor (Cleveland) Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 92.3% 1,287,748
 Atlas Cinema Stadium 16, Barnes & Noble, Dick's Sporting Goods, Dillard's(8), JCPenney, Macy's, Sears(14) OH Mentor (Cleveland) Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 90.7% 1,232,642
 Atlas Cinema Stadium 16, Barnes & Noble, Dick's Sporting Goods, Dillard's(10), JCPenney, Macy's(10), Round One
Gulf View Square (3) FL Port Richey (Tampa) Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 92.1% 756,098
 Best Buy, Dillard's, Macy's, Sears, T.J. Maxx, World of Décor
Indian Mound Mall OH Newark Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 91.2% 556,574
 AMC Theaters, Dick's Sporting Goods, Elder-Beerman, JCPenney, Sears OH Newark Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 89.5% 556,746
 AMC Theaters, Big Sandy Superstore(10), Dick's Sporting Goods, JCPenney, Sears(10)
Irving Mall TX Irving (Dallas) Fee 100.0% Built 1971 99.1% 1,052,170
 AMC Theatres, Dillard's, Burlington Coat Factory, Fitness Connection, La Vida Fashion and Home Décor, Macy's, Sears(14), Shoppers World TX Irving (Dallas) Fee 100.0% Built 1971 99.2% 1,052,013
 AMC Theatres, Burlington Coat Factory, Dillard's(10), Fitness Connection, La Vida Fashion and Home Décor(10), Macy's(10), Shoppers World, Sky Zone
Jefferson Valley Mall NY Yorktown Heights (New York) Fee 100.0% Built 1983 82.7% 570,795
 Dick's Sporting Goods, Macy's, Sears(14) NY Yorktown Heights (New York) Fee 100.0% Built 1983 93.5% 580,871
 Dick's Sporting Goods, Macy's, Sears(5)(8)
Lima Mall OH Lima Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 97.6% 742,867
 JCPenney, Macy's, MC Sporting Goods, Sears OH Lima Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 98.1% 743,872
 JCPenney, Macy's(10)
Lincolnwood Town Center IL Lincolnwood (Chicago) Fee 100.0% Built 1990 97.5% 422,994
 Kohl's, Carson's IL Lincolnwood (Chicago) Fee 100.0% Built 1990 84.0% 422,847
 Kohl's
Lindale Mall IA Cedar Rapids Fee 100.0% Acquired 1998 98.8% 728,321
 Sears(14), Von Maur, Younkers IA Cedar Rapids Fee 100.0% Acquired 1998 93.1% 723,666
 Hy-Vee, Von Maur
Longview Mall TX Longview Fee 100.0% Built 1978 94.9% 653,171
 Dick's Sporting Goods, Dillard's(10), JCPenney(10), L'Patricia(10), Sears(5), Stage(10)
Malibu Lumber Yard CA Malibu Ground Lease (2047) 51.0% Acquired 2015 46.4% 31,514
 N/A
Mall at Fairfield Commons, The OH Beavercreek Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 98.8% 1,045,249
 Dick's Sporting Goods, JCPenney, Macy's(10)
Mall at Johnson City, The TN Johnson City Fee 51.0% Acquired 2015 98.5% 567,892
 Belk for Her, Belk Home Store, Dick's Sporting Goods, JCPenney, Sears(10)
Maplewood Mall MN St. Paul (Minneapolis) Fee 100.0% Acquired 2002 81.6% 905,960
 Barnes & Noble, JCPenney(10), Kohl's(10), Macy's(10)
Markland Mall IN Kokomo Fee 100.0% Built 1968 97.9% 381,625
 Aldi, PetSmart, Ross Dress for Less, Target
Melbourne Square FL Melbourne Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 91.2% 723,654
 Dick's Sporting Goods, Dillard's(11), JCPenney, L.A. Fitness, Macy's(10)
Mesa Mall CO Grand Junction Fee 100.0% Acquired 1998 97.7% 873,311
 Cabela's(10), JCPenney(10), Jo-Ann Fabrics, Target(10)
Morgantown Mall WV Morgantown Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 87.7% 555,350
 AMC Theaters, JCPenney, Sears(5)
Muncie Mall IN Muncie Fee 100.0% Built 1970 87.0% 641,821
 JCPenney, Macy's(10)
New Towne Mall OH New Philadelphia Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 86.6% 505,223
 Dick's Sporting Goods, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Kohl's, Marshalls, Route 250 Health and Performance

Property Name State City (Major Metropolitan Area) Ownership
Interest
(Expiration
if Lease)
 Financial
Interest (1)
 Year
Acquired
or Built
 Occupancy (%)(2)  Total
Center
SF
 Anchors
Longview Mall TX Longview Fee 100.0% Built 1978 95.6% 641,559
 Bealls, Dick's Sporting Goods, Dillard's, JCPenney, L'Patricia, Sears
Malibu Lumber Yard CA Malibu Ground Lease (2047) 100.0% Acquired 2015 75.4% 31,495
 N/A
Mall at Fairfield Commons, The OH Beavercreek Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 97.4% 1,028,695
 Dick's Sporting Goods, Elder-Beerman, JCPenney, Macy's, Sears
Mall at Johnson City, The TN Johnson City Fee 51.0% Acquired 2015 99.4% 568,310
 Belk for Her, Belk Home Store, Dick's Sporting Goods, JCPenney, Sears
Maplewood Mall MN St. Paul (Minneapolis) Fee 100.0% Acquired 2002 85.3% 906,096
 Barnes & Noble, JCPenney, Kohl's, Macy's, Sears(14)
Markland Mall IN Kokomo Ground Lease (2041) 100.0% Built 1968 90.7% 417,978
 Carson's, MC Sporting Goods, Sears(9), Target
Melbourne Square FL Melbourne Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 88.1% 723,765
 Dick's Sporting Goods, Dillard's(8), JCPenney, L.A. Fitness, Macy's
Mesa Mall(12) CO Grand Junction Fee 100.0% Acquired 1998 94.8% 873,467
 Cabela's, Herberger's, JCPenney, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Sears, Target
Morgantown Mall WV Morgantown Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 93.0% 556,036
 Belk, Carmike Cinemas, Elder-Beerman, JCPenney, Sears
Muncie Mall IN Muncie Fee 100.0% Built 1970 94.3% 641,804
 Carson's, JCPenney, Macy's, Sears
New Towne Mall OH New Philadelphia Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 94.6% 494,640
 Elder-Beerman, JCPenney, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Kohl's, Marshalls, Dick's Sporting Goods, Super Fitness Center
Northtown Mall MN Blaine Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 95.5% 606,751
 Becker Furniture, Best Buy, Burlington Coat Factory, Herberger's, Hobby Lobby, L.A. Fitness
Northwoods Mall IL Peoria Fee 100.0% Built 1983 96.1% 692,260
 JCPenney, Macy's (5)(15), Sears
Oak Court Mall TN Memphis Fee 100.0% Acquired 1997 97.1% 846,570
 Dillard's(8), Macy's
Oklahoma City Properties(11) OK Oklahoma City Fee 99.0% Acquired 2015 87.7% 281,389
 Trader Joe's, Whole Foods
Orange Park Mall FL Orange Park (Jacksonville) Fee 100.0% Acquired 1994 98.7% 959,282
 AMC Theatres, Belk, Dick's Sporting Goods, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears
Outlet Collection® | Seattle, The
 WA Auburn (Seattle) Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 97.0% 921,055
 Bed Bath & Beyond, Burlington Coat Factory, L.A. Fitness, Marshall's, Nordstrom Rack, Sam's Club
Paddock Mall FL Ocala Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 92.3% 548,709
 Belk, JCPenney, Macy's, Sears(14)
Pearlridge Center HI Aiea Fee and Ground Lease (2058) 51.0% Acquired 2015 93.0% 1,137,492
 INspiration, Longs Drug Store, Macy's, Pearlridge Mall Theaters, Sears
Property Name State City (Major Metropolitan Area) Ownership
Interest
(Expiration
if Lease)
 Financial
Interest (1)
 Year
Acquired
or Built
 Occupancy (%)(2)  Total
Center
SF
 Anchors
Northtown Mall MN Blaine Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 98.3% 644,735
 Becker Furniture, Best Buy, Burlington Coat Factory, Hobby Lobby(10), Home Depot, L.A. Fitness, Sky Zone
Northwoods Mall IL Peoria Fee 100.0% Built 1983 94.6% 649,408
 JCPenney(10), Round One, Sears(10), The RoomPlace
Oak Court Mall TN Memphis Fee 100.0% Acquired 1997 96.5% 847,127
 Dillard's(4), Macy's(10)
Oklahoma City Properties OK Oklahoma City Fee 51.0%(7)Acquired 2015 97.0% 312,692
 Trader Joe's, Whole Foods
Orange Park Mall FL Orange Park (Jacksonville) Fee 100.0% Acquired 1994 97.8% 959,146
 AMC Theatres, Belk(10), Dick's Sporting Goods, Dillard's(10), JCPenney, Sears(10)
Outlet Collection® | Seattle, The
 WA Auburn (Seattle) Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 92.9% 923,331
 Bed Bath & Beyond, Burlington Coat Factory, Dave & Busters, Nordstrom Rack
Paddock Mall FL Ocala Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 96.4% 548,147
 Belk, JCPenney, Macy's(10), Sears(5)(8)
Pearlridge Center HI Aiea Fee and Ground Lease (2043, 2058) 51.0% Acquired 2015 96.2% 1,297,814
 Bed, Bath, and Beyond, Longs Drug Store, Macy's, Pearlridge Mall Theaters, Ross Dress for Less, Sears, T.J. Maxx
Polaris Fashion Place®
 OH Columbus Fee 51.0% Acquired 2015 99.1% 1,571,346
 Barnes & Noble, Dick's Sporting Goods, JCPenney(10), Macy's(10), Saks Fifth Avenue(10), Sears(5), Von Maur(10)
Port Charlotte Town Center FL Port Charlotte Fee 100.0%(6)Acquired 1996 90.2% 777,246
 Bealls(10), Dillard's(10), DSW, JCPenney, Macy's(10), Recreational Warehouse, Regal Cinema, Sears(5)
Rolling Oaks Mall TX San Antonio Fee 100.0% Built 1988 95.7% 883,336
 Dillard's(10), JCPenney(10), Macy's(10), Sears(5)(10)
Scottsdale Quarter®
 AZ Scottsdale Fee 51.0% Acquired 2015 95.9% 724,804
 Apogee Physicians, H&M, iPic Theaters, JDA Software, Restoration Hardware, Starwood Hotels
Seminole Towne Center FL Sanford (Orlando) Fee 6.8%(6)Built 1995 93.2% 1,109,945
 Athletic Apex, Burlington Coat Factory, Dick's Sporting Goods, Dillard's(10), JCPenney(10), Macy's, United Artists Theatre
Southern Hills Mall IA Sioux City Fee 100.0% Acquired 1998 90.1% 794,010
 AMC Theaters, Barnes & Noble, Hy-Vee, JCPenney(10), Scheel's All Sports, Sears(5)
Southern Park Mall OH Youngstown Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 81.5% 1,202,768
 Cinemark Theatres,
Dillard's(10), JCPenney, Macy's
Southgate Mall MT Missoula Fee 100.0% Acquired 2018 89.4% 630,811
 AMC Theater, Dillard's(10), JCPenney(10), Lucky's Market
Sunland Park Mall TX El Paso Fee 100.0% Built 1988 77.9% 927,305
 Cinemark, Dillard's(11), Sears(5)(10), Starr Western Wear
Town Center at Aurora CO Aurora (Denver) Fee 100.0% Acquired 1998 94.1% 1,080,995
 Century Theatres, Dillard's(10), JCPenney(10), Macy's(10), Sears

Property Name State City (Major Metropolitan Area) Ownership
Interest
(Expiration
if Lease)
 Financial
Interest (1)
 Year
Acquired
or Built
 Occupancy (%)(2)  Total
Center
SF
 Anchors
Polaris Fashion Place®
 OH Columbus Fee 51.0% Acquired 2015 98.1% 1,571,322
 Barnes & Noble, Dick's Sporting Goods, JCPenney, Macy's, Saks Fifth Avenue, Sears, Von Maur
Port Charlotte Town Center FL Port Charlotte Fee 100.0%(10)Acquired 1996 87.7% 770,895
 Bealls, Dillard's, DSW, JCPenney, Macy's, Regal Cinema, Sears
River Oaks Center (3) IL Calumet City (Chicago) Fee 100.0% Acquired 1997 88.8% 1,124,947
 JCPenney, Macy's, Sears(7)
Rolling Oaks Mall TX San Antonio Fee 100.0% Built 1988 94.9% 881,382
 Dillard's, JCPenney, Macy's, Sears
Rushmore Mall SD Rapid City Fee 100.0% Acquired 1998 83.1% 827,422
 At Home, Carmike Cinemas, Herberger's, Hobby Lobby, JCPenney, Sears, Toys 'R Us
Scottsdale Quarter®
 AZ Scottsdale Fee 51.0% Acquired 2015 91.8% 713,626
 H&M, iPic Theaters, Restoration Hardware, Starwood Hotels
Seminole Towne Center FL Sanford (Orlando) Fee 22.4% Built 1995 97.8% 1,110,030
 Burlington Coat Factory, Dick's Sporting Goods, Dillard's, JCPenney, Macy's, Sears, United Artists Theatre
Southern Hills Mall(13) IA Sioux City Fee 100.0% Acquired 1998 % 
 Barnes & Noble, Carmike Cinemas, Hy-Vee, JCPenney, Scheel's All Sports, Sears, Younkers
Southern Park Mall OH Youngstown Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 81.9% 1,206,429
 Cinemark Theatres,
Dillard's, JCPenney, Macy's, Sears
Sunland Park Mall TX El Paso Fee 100.0% Built 1988 94.6% 927,703
 Cinemark, Dillard's(8), Forever 21, Macy's(9), Sears
Town Center at Aurora CO Aurora (Denver) Fee 100.0% Acquired 1998 89.9% 1,081,035
 Century Theatres, Dillard's, JCPenney, Macy's, Sears
Town Center Crossing & Plaza KS Leawood Fee 51.0% Acquired 2015 94.1% 672,373
 Barnes & Noble, Crate & Barrel, Macy's
Towne West Square KS Wichita Fee 100.0% Built 1980 83.6% 943,715
 Dick's Sporting Goods, Dillard's(8), JCPenney, The Movie Machine(5)
Valle Vista Mall TX Harlingen Fee 100.0% Built 1983 80.9% 650,623
 Big Lots, Dillard's, Forever 21, JCPenney, Sears
Virginia Center Commons (3) VA Glen Allen Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 60.5% 774,619
 American Family Fitness, Burlington Coat Factory, JCPenney, Sears
Waterford Lakes Town Center FL Orlando Fee 100.0% Built 1999 99.6% 966,074
 Ashley Furniture Home Store, Barnes & Noble, Bed Bath & Beyond, Best Buy, Jo-Ann Fabrics, L.A. Fitness, Office Max, Regal Cinemas, Ross Dress for Less, Target, T.J. Maxx
Weberstown Mall CA Stockton Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 98.5% 858,550
 Barnes & Noble, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears
West Ridge Mall KS Topeka Fee 100.0% Built 1988 83.6% 996,014
 Burlington Coat Factory, Dillard's, Furniture Mall of Kansas, JCPenney, Sears
Property Name State City (Major Metropolitan Area) Ownership
Interest
(Expiration
if Lease)
 Financial
Interest (1)
 Year
Acquired
or Built
 Occupancy (%)(2)  Total
Center
SF
 Anchors
Town Center Crossing & Plaza KS Leawood Fee 51.0% Acquired 2015 98.6% 670,455
 Arhaus, Barnes & Noble, Crate & Barrel, Macy's(10), Restoration Hardware
Towne West Square KS Wichita Fee 100.0%(12)Built 1980 % 
 N/A
Waterford Lakes Town Center FL Orlando Fee 100.0% Built 1999 100.0% 965,765
 Ashley Furniture Home Store (10), Barnes & Noble, Bed Bath & Beyond, Best Buy, Jo-Ann Fabrics, L.A. Fitness(10), Office Max, Regal Cinemas, Ross Dress for Less, Target(10), T.J. Maxx
Weberstown Mall CA Stockton Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 98.1% 859,071
 Barnes & Noble, Dillard's(10), JCPenney(10), Sears(10)
West Ridge Mall KS Topeka Fee 100.0%(9)Built 1988 75.7% 1,013,982
 Dillard's(10), Furniture Mall of Kansas(10), JCPenney(10), Sky Zone
Westminster Mall CA Westminster (Los Angeles) Fee 100.0% Acquired 1998 86.7% 1,216,695
 Chuze Fitness, DSW,
JCPenney(10), John's Incredible Pizza, Macy's(10), Sky Zone, Target(10)
WestShore Plaza FL Tampa Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 92.8% 1,075,486
 AMC Theatres, Dick's Sporting Goods, JCPenney, Macy's(10), Sears(5)
Total Enclosed Retail Properties Portfolio Square Footage (3)   43,632,451
  
                 
Open Air Properties            
Bloomingdale Court IL Bloomingdale (Chicago) Fee 100.0% Built 1987 98.9% 697,088
 Best Buy, Dick's Sporting Goods, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Office Max, Picture Show, Ross Dress for Less, T.J. Maxx N More, Walmart Supercenter(10)
Bowie Town Center Strip MD Bowie (Wash, D.C.) Fee 100.0% Built 2001 92.2% 106,636
 Safeway(10)
Canyon View Marketplace CO Grand Junction Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 100.0% 199,815
 City Market(10), Kohl's(10)
Charles Towne Square SC Charleston Fee 100.0% Built 1976 100.0% 71,794
 Regal Cinema
Chesapeake Center VA Chesapeake (Virginia Beach) Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 94.3% 279,581
 Dollar Tree(10), PetSmart, Value City Furniture
Concord Mills Marketplace NC Concord (Charlotte) Fee 100.0% Acquired 2007 100.0% 250,704
 At Home, BJ's Wholesale Club
Countryside Plaza IL Countryside (Chicago) Fee 100.0% Built 1977 100.0% 403,455
 Best Buy, Dollar Tree, Floor & Decor, Home Depot(10), Jo-Ann Fabrics, PetSmart, The Tile Shop
Dare Centre NC Kill Devil Hills Ground Lease (2058) 100.0% Acquired 2004 95.8% 168,613
 Belk(10), Food Lion
DeKalb Plaza PA King of Prussia (Philadelphia) Fee 100.0% Acquired 2003 100.0% 101,915
 ACME Grocery(10), Bob's Discount Furniture
Empire East SD Sioux Falls Fee 100.0% Acquired 1998 100.0% 301,438
 Bed Bath & Beyond, Kohl's, Target(10)
Fairfax Court VA Fairfax (Wash, D.C.) Fee 100.0% Acquired 2014 98.5% 249,488
 Burlington Coat Factory, Pier 1, XSport Fitness
Fairfield Town Center TX Houston Fee 100.0% Built 2014 98.8% 364,469
 Academy Sports, HEB(10), Marshalls, Party City

Property Name State City (Major Metropolitan Area) Ownership
Interest
(Expiration
if Lease)
 Financial
Interest (1)
 Year
Acquired
or Built
 Occupancy (%)(2)  Total
Center
SF
 Anchors
Westminster Mall CA Westminster (Los Angeles) Fee 100.0% Acquired 1998 88.8% 1,215,005
 Chuze Fitness, DSW,
JCPenney, Macy's, Sears(14), Target
WestShore Plaza FL Tampa Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 96.7% 1,076,400
 AMC Theatres, Dick's Sporting Goods, JCPenney, Macy's, Sears
Total Enclosed Retail Properties Portfolio Square Footage (4)         47,948,152
  
                 
Community Centers            
Bloomingdale Court IL Bloomingdale (Chicago) Fee 100.0% Built 1987 99.5% 696,641
 Best Buy, Dick's Sporting Goods, H.H. Gregg, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Office Max, Picture Show, Ross Dress for Less, T.J. Maxx N More, Walmart Supercenter
Bowie Town Center Strip MD Bowie (Wash, D.C.) Fee 100.0% Built 2001 100.0% 106,589
 Safeway
Canyon View Marketplace CO Grand Junction Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 95.6% 43,053
 Kohl's
Charles Towne Square SC Charleston Fee 100.0% Built 1976 100.0% 71,794
 Regal Cinema
Chesapeake Center VA Chesapeake (Virginia Beach) Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 100.0% 305,853
 Dollar Tree, Michaels, PetsMart, Value City Furniture
Concord Mills Marketplace NC Concord (Charlotte) Fee 100.0% Acquired 2007 100.0% 262,020
 BJ's Wholesale Club, At Home, REC Warehouse
Countryside Plaza IL Countryside (Chicago) Fee 100.0% Built 1977 100.0% 403,756
 Best Buy, Dollar Tree, Home Depot, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Office Depot, PetsMart, The Tile Shop, Value City Furniture
Dare Centre NC Kill Devil Hills Ground Lease (2058) 100.0% Acquired 2004 100.0% 168,673
 Belk, Food Lion
DeKalb Plaza PA King of Prussia (Philadelphia) Fee 100.0% Acquired 2003 100.0% 101,911
 ACME Grocery, Bob's Discount Furniture
Empire East SD Sioux Falls Fee 100.0% Acquired 1998 100.0% 301,438
 Bed Bath & Beyond, Kohl's, Target
Fairfax Court VA Fairfax (Wash, D.C.) Fee 100.0% Acquired 2014 100.0% 249,488
 Burlington Coat Factory, Offenbacher's, Pier 1, XSport Fitness
Fairfield Town Center TX Houston Fee 100.0% Built 2014 100.0% 228,642
 HEB, Marshalls, Party City
Forest Plaza IL Rockford Fee 100.0% Built 1985 100.0% 434,839
 Babies 'R Us/Toys 'R Us, Bed Bath & Beyond, Big Lots, Kohl's, Marshalls, Michaels, Office Max, Petco, Shoe Carnival
Gaitway Plaza FL Ocala Fee 99.0%(10)Acquired 2014 100.0% 208,039
 Bed Bath & Beyond, Michael's, Office Depot, Ross Dress for Less, T.J. Maxx
Gateway Centers TX Austin Fee 100.0% Acquired 2004 97.1% 512,339
 
Best Buy, Crate & Barrel, Nordstrom Rack, Off 5th Saks 5th Ave, Regal Cinema, REI, Whole Foods, The Container Store, The Tile Shop
Greenwood Plus IN Greenwood (Indianapolis) Fee 100.0% Built 1979 100.0% 155,319
 Best Buy, Kohl's
Henderson Square PA King of Prussia (Philadelphia) Fee 100.0% Acquired 2003 100.0% 107,371
 Avalon Carpet & Tile Shop, Giant
Property Name State City (Major Metropolitan Area) Ownership
Interest
(Expiration
if Lease)
 Financial
Interest (1)
 Year
Acquired
or Built
 Occupancy (%)(2)  Total
Center
SF
 Anchors
Forest Plaza IL Rockford Fee 100.0% Built 1985 100.0% 433,816
 Bed Bath & Beyond, Kohl's, Marshalls, Michaels, Office Max, Petco
Gaitway Plaza FL Ocala Fee 96.0%(6)Acquired 2014 98.4% 196,812
 Bed Bath & Beyond, Michael's, Office Depot, Ross Dress for Less, T.J. Maxx
Gateway Centers TX Austin Fee 51.0% Acquired 2004 98.1% 513,987
 
Best Buy, Crate & Barrel, Nordstrom Rack, Off 5th Saks 5th Ave, Regal Cinema, REI(10), Whole Foods, The Container Store, The Tile Shop
Greenwood Plus IN Greenwood (Indianapolis) Fee 100.0% Built 1979 100.0% 155,319
 Best Buy, Kohl's
Henderson Square PA King of Prussia (Philadelphia) Fee 100.0% Acquired 2003 100.0% 107,371
 Avalon Carpet & Tile Shop, Giant
Keystone Shoppes IN Indianapolis Fee 100.0% Acquired 1997 97.5% 36,457
 N/A
Lake Plaza IL Waukegan (Chicago) Fee 100.0% Built 1986 97.6% 215,590
 Home Owners Bargain Outlet
Lake View Plaza IL Orland Park (Chicago) Fee 100.0% Built 1986 97.7% 367,369
 Arhaus, Best Buy, Bob's Discount Furniture, Golf Galaxy, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Petco, Tuesday Morning, Value City Furniture(10)
Lakeline Plaza TX Cedar Park (Austin) Fee 100.0% Built 1998 100.0% 386,229
 Bed, Bath, & Beyond, Best Buy, Jumpstreet, Office Max, PetSmart, Ross Dress for Less, T.J. Maxx, Total Wine & More(10)
Lima Center OH Lima Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 100.0% 233,878
 Hobby Lobby(10), Jo-Ann Fabrics, Kohl's, T.J. Maxx
Lincoln Crossing IL O'Fallon (St. Louis) Fee 100.0% Built 1990 100.0% 303,526
 Academy Sports, PetSmart, Walmart(10)
MacGregor Village NC Cary Fee 100.0% Acquired 2004 83.6% 139,520
 Sports HQ
Mall of Georgia Crossing GA Buford (Atlanta) Fee 100.0% Built 1999 100.0% 440,774
 Best Buy, Hobby Lobby, Nordstrom Rack, Staples, Target(10), T.J. Maxx 'n More
Markland Plaza IN Kokomo Fee 100.0% Built 1974 100.0% 90,527
 Bed Bath & Beyond, Best Buy
Martinsville Plaza VA Martinsville Ground Lease (2026) 100.0% Built 1967 99.3% 102,105
 Ollie's Bargain Outlet, Rose's
Matteson Plaza IL Matteson (Chicago) Fee 100.0% Built 1988 56.2% 273,836
 Beauty Trends, Shoppers World
Muncie Towne Plaza IN Muncie Fee 100.0% Built 1998 86.1% 171,621
 AMC Theatres(10), Kohl's, T.J. Maxx
North Ridge Shopping Center NC Raleigh Fee 100.0% Acquired 2004 97.8% 171,489
 Ace Hardware, Harris-Teeter Grocery, O2 Fitness Club
Northwood Plaza IN Fort Wayne Fee 100.0% Built 1974 91.8% 204,956
 Target(10)
Palms Crossing TX McAllen Fee 51.0% Built 2007 78.6% 389,618
 Barnes & Noble, Bealls, Best Buy, DSW, Hobby Lobby
Plaza at Buckland Hills, The CT Manchester Fee 100.0% Acquired 2014 100.0% 321,328
 Big Lots, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Michael's(10), PetSmart(10), Total Wine & More, Trader Joe's
Richardson Square TX Richardson (Dallas) Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 100.0% 516,100
 Lowe's Home Improvement(10), Ross Dress for Less, Sears(5)(10), Super Target(10)

Property Name State City (Major Metropolitan Area) Ownership
Interest
(Expiration
if Lease)
 Financial
Interest (1)
 Year
Acquired
or Built
 Occupancy (%)(2)  Total
Center
SF
 Anchors
Keystone Shoppes IN Indianapolis Fee 100.0% Acquired 1997 100.0% 29,126
 N/A
Lake Plaza IL Waukegan (Chicago) Fee 100.0% Built 1986 94.8% 215,568
 Dollar Tree, Home Owners Bargain Outlet
Lake View Plaza IL Orland Park (Chicago) Fee 100.0% Built 1986 98.5% 367,369
 Arhaus, Best Buy, Bob's Discount Furniture, Golf Galaxy, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Party City(6), Petco, Tuesday Morning, Value City Furniture
Lakeline Plaza TX Cedar Park (Austin) Fee 100.0% Built 1998 100.0% 386,854
 Bed Bath & Beyond(7), Best Buy, Office Max, PetsMart, Dress for Less, T.J. Maxx
Lima Center OH Lima Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 98.8% 233,878
 Hobby Lobby, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Kohl's, T.J. Maxx
Lincoln Crossing IL O'Fallon (St. Louis) Fee 100.0% Built 1990 97.6% 303,526
 Academy Sports, PetsMart, Walmart
MacGregor Village NC Cary Fee 100.0% Acquired 2004 64.8% 146,774
 Apex Soccer
Mall of Georgia Crossing GA Buford (Atlanta) Fee 100.0% Built 1999 98.7% 440,774
 American Signature Furniture, Best Buy, Nordstrom Rack, Staples, Target, T.J. Maxx 'n More
Markland Plaza IN Kokomo Fee 100.0% Built 1974 93.7% 90,527
 Bed Bath & Beyond, Best Buy
Martinsville Plaza VA Martinsville Ground Lease (2046) 100.0% Built 1967 99.3% 102,105
 Food Lion, Rose's
Matteson Plaza IL Matteson (Chicago) Fee 100.0% Built 1988 56.2% 273,836
 Shoppers World
Morgantown Commons WV Morgantown Fee 100.0% Acquired 2015 99.3% 230,843
 Gabriel Brothers, Kmart(5)
Muncie Towne Plaza IN Muncie Fee 100.0% Built 1998 100.0% 171,621
 AMC Theatres, Kohl's, MC Sporting Goods, T.J. Maxx
North Ridge Shopping Center NC Raleigh Fee 100.0% Acquired 2004 95.5% 169,796
 Ace Hardware, Harris-Teeter Grocery
Northwood Plaza IN Fort Wayne Fee 100.0% Built 1974 81.4% 204,956
 Target
Palms Crossing TX McAllen Fee 100.0% Built 2007 86.1% 405,925
 Babies 'R Us, Barnes & Noble, Bealls, Best Buy, DSW, Hobby Lobby
Plaza at Buckland Hills, The CT Manchester Fee 100.0% Acquired 2014 100.0% 327,785
 Big Lots, Eastern Mountain Sports, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Michael's, PetsMart, Toys 'R Us

Property Name State City (Major Metropolitan Area) Ownership
Interest
(Expiration
if Lease)
 Financial
Interest (1)
 Year
Acquired
or Built
 Occupancy (%)(2)  Total
Center
SF
 Anchors
Richardson Square TX Richardson (Dallas) Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 100.0% 516,100
 Lowe's Home Improvement, Ross Dress for Less, Sears, Super Target
Rockaway Commons NJ Rockaway (New York) Fee 100.0% Acquired 1998 97.9% 239,050
 Best Buy, DSW, Nordstrom Rack
Rockaway Town Plaza NJ Rockaway (New York) Fee 100.0% Built 2004 100.0% 374,430
 Buy Buy Baby, Christmas Tree Shops, Dick's Sporting Goods, Michael's, PetsMart, Target
Royal Eagle Plaza FL Coral Springs (Miami) Fee 100.0% Acquired 2014 100.0% 202,952
 Hobby Lobby, Lucky's Market
Shops at Arbor Walk, The TX Austin Ground Lease (2056) 100.0% Built 2006 98.9% 458,469
 DSW, Home Depot, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Marshalls, Sam Moon Trading Co., Spec's Wine, Spirits and Fine Foods
Shops at North East Mall, The TX Hurst (Dallas) Fee 100.0% Built 1999 100.0% 365,039
 Barnes & Noble, Bed Bath & Beyond, Best Buy, DSW, Michaels, PetsMart, T.J. Maxx
St. Charles Towne Plaza MD Waldorf (Wash, D.C.) Fee 100.0% Built 1987 86.8% 391,653
 Ashley Furniture, Big Lots, Citi Trends, Dollar Tree, K & G Menswear, Shoppers Food Warehouse, Value City Furniture
Tippecanoe Plaza IN Lafayette Fee 100.0% Built 1974 100.0% 90,522
 Barnes & Noble, Best Buy
University Center IN Mishawaka Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 89.6% 150,441
 Best Buy, Michael's, Ross Dress for Less
University Town Plaza FL Pensacola Fee 100.0% Redeveloped 2013 99.1% 565,538
 Academy Sports, Burlington Coat Factory, JCPenney, Sears(14), Toys 'R Us/Babies 'R Us
Village Park Plaza IN Carmel (Indianapolis) Fee 100.0% Acquired 2014 100.0% 575,548
 Bed Bath & Beyond, Hobby Lobby, Kohl's, Marsh Supermarket, Regal Cinemas, Walmart Supercenter
Washington Plaza IN Indianapolis Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 79.4% 50,107
 Jo-Ann Fabrics
West Ridge Plaza KS Topeka Fee 100.0% Built 1988 100.0% 253,086
 Target, T.J. Maxx, Toys 'R Us
West Town Corners FL Altamonte Springs (Orlando) Fee 100.0%(10)Acquired 2014 77.3% 382,423
 American Signature Furniture, PetsMart, Walmart, Winn-Dixie Marketplace

Property Name State City (Major Metropolitan Area) Ownership
Interest
(Expiration
if Lease)
 Financial
Interest (1)
 Year
Acquired
or Built
 Occupancy (%)(2)  Total
Center
SF
 Anchors State City (Major Metropolitan Area) Ownership
Interest
(Expiration
if Lease)
 Financial
Interest (1)
 Year
Acquired
or Built
 Occupancy (%)(2)  Total
Center
SF
 Anchors
Rockaway Commons NJ Rockaway (New York) Fee 100.0% Acquired 1998 98.7% 238,970
 Best Buy, Buy Buy Baby, Christmas Tree Shops, DSW, Michael's, Nordstrom Rack
Rockaway Town Plaza NJ Rockaway (New York) Fee 100.0% Built 2004 100.0% 306,436
  Dick's Sporting Goods(10), PetSmart, Target(10)
Royal Eagle Plaza FL Coral Springs (Miami) Fee 100.0% Acquired 2014 83.6% 186,283
 Hobby Lobby, Lucky's Market
Shops at Arbor Walk, The TX Austin Ground Lease (2056) 51.0% Built 2006 99.1% 309,064
 DSW, Home Depot, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Marshalls, Sam Moon Trading Co., Spec's Wine, Spirits and Fine Foods
Shops at North East Mall, The TX Hurst (Dallas) Fee 100.0% Built 1999 100.0% 365,039
 Barnes & Noble, Bed Bath & Beyond, Best Buy, DSW, Michaels, PetSmart, T.J. Maxx
St. Charles Towne Plaza MD Waldorf (Wash, D.C.) Fee 100.0% Built 1987 90.6% 391,325
 Ashley Furniture, Big Lots, Citi Trends, Dollar Tree, K & G Menswear, Shoppers Food Warehouse, Value City Furniture(10)
Tippecanoe Plaza IN Lafayette Fee 100.0% Built 1974 100.0% 90,522
 Barnes & Noble, Best Buy
University Center IN Mishawaka Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 96.8% 150,441
 Best Buy(10), Michael's, Ross Dress for Less
University Town Plaza FL Pensacola Fee 100.0% Redeveloped 2013 78.3% 565,538
 Academy Sports, Burlington Coat Factory, JCPenney(10)
Village Park Plaza IN Carmel (Indianapolis) Fee 100.0% Acquired 2014 100.0% 517,948
 Bed Bath & Beyond, Hobby Lobby, Kohl's, Marsh Supermarket(10), Regal Cinemas, Walmart Supercenter(10)
Washington Plaza IN Indianapolis Fee 100.0% Acquired 1996 90.0% 50,107
 Jo-Ann Fabrics
West Ridge Plaza KS Topeka Fee 100.0%(9)Built 1988 100.0% 253,086
 Ashley HomeStore (10), Target(10), T.J. Maxx
West Town Corners FL Altamonte Springs (Orlando) Fee 100.0%(6)Acquired 2014 91.7% 383,220
 American Signature Furniture(10), PetSmart, T.J. Maxx, Walmart(10), Winn-Dixie Marketplace
Westland Park Plaza FL Orange Park (Jacksonville) Fee 100.0%(10)Acquired 2014 87.9% 163,259
 Beall's, Burlington Coat Factory, Guitar Center, L.A. Fitness FL Orange Park (Jacksonville) Fee 100.0%(6)Acquired 2014 86.7% 163,259
 Beall's, Burlington Coat Factory, Guitar Center, L.A. Fitness
White Oaks Plaza IL Springfield Fee 100.0% Built 1986 97.3% 404,879
 Babies 'R Us/Toys 'R Us, County Market, Kohl's, Office Max, T.J. Maxx, Ulta IL Springfield Fee 100.0% Built 1986 98.8% 398,077
 Big Lots, County Market(10), HomeGoods, Kohl's, T.J. Maxx
Whitehall Mall PA Whitehall Fee 100.0% Acquired 2014 97.1% 613,731
 Bed Bath & Beyond, Buy Buy Baby, Gold's Gym, Kohl's, Michael's(5), Raymour & Flanigan Furniture, Sears PA Whitehall Fee 100.0% Acquired 2014 99.5% 603,475
 Bed Bath & Beyond, Buy Buy Baby, Gold's Gym, Kohl's, Michael's, Raymour & Flanigan Furniture, Sears
Wolf Ranch TX Georgetown (Austin) Fee 100.0% Built 2005 98.9% 632,253
 Best Buy, DSW, Gold's Gym, Kohl's, Michael's, Office Depot, PetsMart, Ross Dress for Less, Target, T.J. Maxx TX Georgetown (Austin) Fee 100.0% Built 2005 97.1% 632,246
 Best Buy, DSW, Gold's Gym, Kohl's(10), Michael's, Office Depot, PetSmart, Ross Dress for Less, Target(10), T.J. Maxx
Total Community Center Portfolio Square Footage(4)     14,888,508
 
Total Portfolio Square Footage(4)     62,836,660
 
Total Open Air Portfolio Square Footage(3)Total Open Air Portfolio Square Footage(3)   14,572,260
 
Total Portfolio Square Footage(3)Total Portfolio Square Footage(3)   58,204,711
 


(1)Direct and indirect interests in some joint venture properties are subject to preferences on distributions and/or capital allocation in favor of other partners.
(2)Enclosed Retail Properties—Executed leases for all Company-owned gross leasable area ("GLA")GLA in enclosed retail property stores, excluding majors and anchors. Community centers—Open Air Properties—Executed leases for all Company-owned retail GLA (or total center GLA).
(3)Noncore property. We sold Virginia Center Commons on January 10, 2017 and we sold Gulf View Square and River Oaks Center on February 21, 2017, respectively.
(4)Includes office space in the centers,properties, including the following centersproperties with more than 20,000 square feet of office space:
Clay Terrace—80,033 sq. ft.; Oak Court Mall—124,971123,891 sq. ft.; Oklahoma City Properties—23,74520,469 sq. ft.;
Royal Eagle Plaza—25,207 sq. ft.; Pearlridge Center—130,983182,796 sq. ft.; Scottsdale Quarter—301,115 sq. ft.; Town West Square—32,362297,473 sq. ft.
(5)(4)Indicates vacant anchor space(s).tenant has multiple locations at this property and one of these spaces is owned by others.
(6)Indicates anchor or major that is currently under development.
(7)Indicates anchor is vacant but not owned by us.
(8)Tenant has multiple locations at this center.
(9)(5)Indicates anchor has announced its intent to close this location in 2017.2019.
(10)(6)We receive substantially all the economic benefit of the propertyOur interest does not reflect our legal ownership percentage due to a preference or advance.capital preferences.
(11)(7)Includes the following properties: Classen Curve, Nichols Hills Plaza and The Triangle @ Classen Curve.
(12)(8)Sears store owned by Seritage Growth Properties.
(9)Borrower is in default and thus in discussions with the loan servicer regarding the nonrecourse mortgage loan on this property.
(13)(10)Indicates anchor space is owned by others.
(11)Indicates tenant has multiple locations at this property and both of these spaces are owned by others.
(12)Borrower is in default. On October 27, 2016,August 24, 2018, we received notification that a receiver had been appointed to manage and lease the property. As we no longer manage or lease the property and we receive no economics from the property after the date the property was placed into receivership, it is excluded from our GLA and occupancy numbers presented.
(14)Sears store owned by Seritage Growth Properties.
(15)The Company purchased this anchor space from Macy's in January 2017.



Lease Expirations(1)
The following table summarizes lease expiration data for our properties as of December 31, 2016:2018:
Year 
Number of
Leases
Expiring
 Square Feet 
Average Base
Minimum Rent
Per Square Foot
 
Percentage of
Gross Annual
Rental
Revenues(2)
 
Number of
Leases
Expiring
 Square Feet 
Average Base
Minimum Rent
Per Square Foot
 
Percentage of
Gross Annual
Rental
Revenues(2)
Inline Stores and Freestanding  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Month To Month Leases 207
 505,612
 $30.17
 2.2% 180
 348,564
 $38.91
 2.2%
2017 790
 2,267,110
 $26.85
 9.0%
2018 852
 2,539,881
 $26.97
 10.1%
2019 723
 2,511,414
 $26.29
 10.2% 719
 2,004,342
 $28.68
 9.1%
2020 583
 2,193,408
 $25.48
 8.6% 796
 2,621,941
 $26.05
 11.1%
2021 539
 1,971,339
 $24.07
 7.4% 706
 2,394,365
 $25.65
 10.2%
2022 336
 1,415,050
 $25.33
 5.5% 569
 2,011,600
 $26.44
 8.8%
2023 302
 1,372,329
 $25.45
 5.5% 510
 1,875,301
 $27.40
 8.5%
2024 238
 1,024,136
 $27.49
 4.1% 294
 1,193,210
 $26.86
 5.3%
2025 222
 976,761
 $26.76
 4.1% 230
 987,930
 $27.89
 4.6%
2026 225
 1,121,144
 $26.10
 4.5% 226
 1,199,799
 $28.57
 5.6%
2027 and Thereafter 137
 1,076,227
 $21.02
 3.0%
2027 224
 1,044,060
 $28.04
 4.7%
2028 149
 645,998
 $25.88
 2.7%
2029 and Thereafter 58
 476,411
 $24.98
 2.0%
Specialty Leasing Agreements w/ terms in excess of 11 months 770
 1,849,969
 $14.44
 4.2% 703
 1,665,257
 $13.06
 3.7%
Anchors  
  
  
  
        
Month To Month Leases 1
 28,470
 $4.50
 0.0%
2017 15
 1,871,267
 $3.29
 0.4%
2018 46
 2,587,673
 $7.53
 2.6%
2019 44
 3,131,037
 $6.12
 2.2% 18
 1,484,687
 $2.95
 0.8%
2020 63
 3,326,713
 $7.35
 3.9% 52
 2,992,747
 $6.67
 3.4%
2021 57
 3,860,266
 $7.42
 3.5% 46
 2,523,234
 $7.65
 3.2%
2022 46
 2,925,067
 $5.68
 2.4% 37
 1,871,211
 $7.93
 2.4%
2023 35
 2,320,919
 $8.43
 1.8% 48
 2,278,701
 $9.80
 3.7%
2024 17
 1,041,481
 $6.90
 0.8% 27
 1,278,653
 $8.72
 1.9%
2025 20
 1,535,203
 $14.32
 1.1% 20
 960,667
 $11.08
 1.8%
2026 11
 400,847
 $11.02
 0.7% 13
 458,843
 $11.47
 0.8%
2027 and Thereafter 131
 16,132,099
 $7.10
 2.2%
2027 15
 783,498
 $8.45
 1.0%
2028 13
 481,281
 $13.42
 1.1%
2029 and Thereafter 15
 1,007,897
 $9.10
 1.4%


(1)Does not consider the impact of renewal options that may be contained in leases.leases and only considers Company-owned GLA managed at December 31, 2018. Accordingly, leases at Towne West Square are excluded as the property was placed into receivership during 2018.
(2)Gross annual rental revenues represents 20162018 consolidated and joint venture combined base rental revenue for the portfolio.

Mortgage Financing on Properties
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the mortgages and unsecured indebtedness encumbering our properties and the properties held in our joint venture arrangements, and our unsecured corporate debt as of December 31, 2016:2018:
Summary of Mortgage and Other Indebtedness
As of December 31, 20162018
(Inin thousands)
Property Name Maturity Date (1) Interest Rate Principal Balance Our Share of Principal Balance   F = Fixed
V = Variable
Floating
Consolidated Indebtedness:    
  
  
    
Secured Indebtedness    
  
  
    
Anderson Mall 12/1/2022 4.61% $17,891
 $17,891
   F
Ashland Town Center 7/6/2021 4.90% 36,824
 36,824
   F
Brunswick Square 3/1/2024 4.80% 71,154
 71,154
   F
Canyon View Marketplace 11/6/2023 5.47% 5,215
 5,215
   F
Charlottesville Fashion Square 4/1/2024 4.54% 46,099
 46,099
   F
Concord Mills Marketplace 11/1/2023 4.82% 16,000
 16,000
   F
Cottonwood Mall 4/6/2024 4.82% 97,203
 97,203
   F
Dayton Mall 9/1/2022 4.57% 80,421
 80,421
   F
Forest Plaza 10/10/2019 7.50% 15,588
 15,588
   F
Grand Central Mall 7/6/2020 6.05% 39,598
 39,598
   F
Lakeline Plaza 10/10/2019 7.50% 14,604
 14,604
   F
Lincolnwood Town Center 4/1/2021 4.26% 48,662
 48,662
   F
Mall of Georgia Crossing 10/6/2022 4.28% 22,208
 22,208
   F
Muncie Mall 4/1/2021 4.19% 33,876
 33,876
   F
Muncie Towne Plaza 10/10/2019 7.50% 6,071
 6,071
   F
North Ridge Shopping Center 12/1/2022 3.41% 11,764
 11,764
   F
Oak Court Mall 4/1/2021 4.76% 36,998
 36,998
   F
Port Charlotte Town Center 11/1/2020 5.30% 42,196
 42,196
 (2) F
Southgate Mall 9/27/2023 4.48% 35,000
 35,000
   F
Town Center at Aurora 4/1/2021 4.19% 52,250
 52,250
   F
Towne West Square 6/1/2021 5.61% 45,205
 45,205
 (3) F
Weberstown Mall 6/8/2021 4.25% 65,000
 65,000
   V
West Ridge Mall 3/6/2024 7.84% 39,945
 39,945
 (3) F
West Ridge Plaza 3/6/2024 7.84% 9,986
 9,986
 (3) F
Westminster Mall 4/1/2024 4.65% 78,375
 78,375
   F
White Oaks Plaza 10/10/2019 7.50% 12,143
 12,143
   F
Unsecured Indebtedness    
  
  
    
Credit Facility 12/30/2022 3.75% 290,000
 290,000
   V
5.950% Notes due 2024 8/15/2024 5.95% 750,000
 750,000
   F
3.850% Notes due 2020 ("Exchange Notes") 4/1/2020 3.85% 250,000
 250,000
   F
Term Loan (unhedged portion) 12/30/2022 3.95% 100,000
 100,000
   V
Term Loan (hedged portion) 12/30/2022 4.21% 250,000
 250,000
 (4) F
December 2015 Term Loan 1/10/2023 3.51% 340,000
 340,000
 (4) F
Total Indebtedness at Face Value 4.0 yrs. 4.75% 2,960,276
 2,960,276
    

Property Name Maturity Date Interest Rate Principal Balance Our Share of Principal Balance   F = Fixed
V = Variable
Floating
Consolidated Indebtedness:    
  
  
    
Secured Indebtedness    
  
  
    
Anderson Mall 12/1/2022 4.61% $18,981
 $18,981
   F
Arbor Hills 1/1/2026 4.27% 25,498
 24,287
 (1)(2) F
Ashland Town Center 7/6/2021 4.90% 38,440
 38,440
   F
Brunswick Square 3/1/2024 4.80% 73,791
 73,791
   F
Canyon View Marketplace 11/6/2023 5.47% 5,390
 5,390
   F
Charlottesville Fashion Square 4/1/2024 4.54% 47,878
 47,878
   F
Concord Mills Marketplace 11/1/2023 4.82% 16,000
 16,000
   F
Cottonwood Mall 4/6/2024 4.82% 100,772
 100,772
   F
Dayton Mall 9/1/2022 4.57% 82,000
 82,000
   F
Forest Plaza 10/10/2019 7.50% 16,544
 16,544
   F
Grand Central Mall 7/6/2020 6.05% 41,149
 41,149
   F
Henderson Square 1/1/2018 3.17% 12,155
 12,155
   F
Lakeline Plaza 10/10/2019 7.50% 15,499
 15,499
   F
Lincolnwood Town Center 4/1/2021 4.26% 50,633
 50,633
   F
Mall of Georgia Crossing 10/6/2022 4.28% 23,197
 23,197
   F
Mesa Mall 6/1/2016 5.79% 87,250
 87,250
 (3) F
Muncie Mall 4/1/2021 4.19% 35,326
 35,326
   F
Muncie Towne Plaza 10/10/2019 7.50% 6,443
 6,443
   F
North Ridge Shopping Center 12/1/2022 3.41% 12,264
 12,264
   F
Oak Court Mall 4/1/2021 4.76% 38,371
 38,371
   F
Outlet Collection® | Seattle, The
 1/14/2020 2.27% 86,500
 86,500
 (5) V
Palms Crossing 8/1/2021 5.49% 35,461
 35,461
 (2) F
Port Charlotte Town Center 11/1/2020 5.30% 44,021
 44,021
 (1) F
Rushmore Mall 2/1/2019 5.79% 94,000
 94,000
   F
Shops at Arbor Walk, The 8/1/2021 5.49% 40,078
 40,078
 (2) F
Southern Hills Mall 6/1/2016 9.79% 101,500
 101,500
 (3) F
Town Center at Aurora 4/1/2021 4.19% 54,250
 54,250
   F
Towne West Square 6/1/2021 5.61% 47,051
 47,051
   F
Valle Vista Mall 5/10/2017 5.35% 40,000
 40,000
   F
Weberstown Mall 6/8/2021 2.52% 65,000
 65,000
 (5) V
West Ridge Mall 3/6/2024 4.84% 41,413
 41,413
   F

Property Name 
Maturity
Date
 Interest Rate Principal Balance 
Our Share
of Principal Balance
   
F = Fixed
V = Variable
Floating
 Maturity Date (1) Interest Rate Principal Balance Our Share of Principal Balance   F = Fixed
V = Variable
Floating
West Ridge Plaza 3/6/2024 4.84% 10,353
 10,353
 F
Westminster Mall 4/1/2024 4.65% 81,468
 81,468
 F
WestShore Plaza 10/1/2017 2.82% 99,600
 99,600
 V
White Oaks Plaza 10/10/2019 7.50% 12,887
 12,887
 F
Whitehall Mall 11/1/2018 7.00% 9,266
 9,266
 F
Unsecured Indebtedness    
  
  
    
Credit Facility 5/30/2019 2.02% 308,000
 308,000
 (5) V
2014 Term Loan 5/30/2019 2.22% 300,000
 300,000
 (5) V
2014 Term Loan (5) 5/30/2019 2.04% 200,000
 200,000
 (5) F
Notes Payable 4/1/2020 3.85% 250,000
 250,000
 F
June 2015 Term Loan 3/2/2020 2.56% 500,000
 500,000
 (4) F
December 2015 Term Loan 1/10/2023 3.51% 340,000
 340,000
 (4) F
Total Indebtedness at Face Value 3.7 yrs. 3.75% 3,508,429
 3,507,218
    
       
Premium on Fixed-Rate Indebtedness    
 12,661
 12,661
   F    
 5,764
 5,764
   
Bond Discounts    
 (47) (47)   V    
 (9,680) (9,680)   
Debt Issuance Costs, net   (14,639) (14,639)    (18,883) (18,883) 
Total Consolidated Indebtedness 3.7 yrs. 3.75% 3,506,404
 3,505,193
     4.1 yrs. 4.79% 2,937,477
 2,937,477
    
Unconsolidated Secured Indebtedness:    
  
  
        
  
  
    
Arbor Hills 1/1/2026 4.27% 24,660
 12,577
 F
Arboretum, The 6/1/2027 4.13% 59,400
 30,294
 F
Gateway Centers 6/1/2027 4.03% 112,500
 57,375
 F
Mall at Johnson City, The 5/6/2020 6.76% $50,770
 $25,893
 F 5/6/2020 6.76% 49,050
 25,016
 F
Oklahoma City Properties       
Loan One 6/1/2027 3.90% 52,779
 26,917
 F
Loan Two 1/1/2023 5.00% 12,981
 6,620
 V
Palms Crossing 8/1/2021 5.49% 34,110
 17,396
 F
Pearlridge Center 6/1/2025 3.53% 225,000
 114,750
   F       
Loan One 6/1/2025 3.53% 225,000
 114,750
   F
Loan Two 5/1/2025 4.07% 43,200
 22,032
 F
Polaris Fashion Place®
              
Loan One 3/1/2025 3.90% 225,000
 114,750
 F 3/1/2025 3.90% 225,000
 114,750
 F
Loan Two 3/1/2025 4.46% 15,500
 7,905
 F 3/1/2025 4.46% 15,500
 7,905
 F
Scottsdale Quarter®
 6/1/2025 3.53% 165,000
 84,150
   F       
Loan One 6/1/2025 3.53% 165,000
 84,150
   F
Loan Two 4/1/2027 4.36% 55,000
 28,050
 F
Seminole Towne Center 5/6/2021 5.97% 55,592
 12,442
 (1) F 5/6/2021 5.97% 53,603
 3,624
 (2) F
Shops at Arbor Walk, The 8/1/2021 5.49% 38,552
 19,662
 F
Town Center Crossing & Plaza              
Loan One 2/1/2027 4.25% 35,204
 17,954
   F 2/1/2027 4.25% 33,647
 17,160
   F
Loan Two 2/1/2027 5.00% 70,944
 36,181
 F 2/1/2027 5.00% 67,978
 34,669
 F
Other joint venture mortgage debt   21,205
 2,177
   F 7/1/2032 4.70% 19,269
 2,017
   F
Total Indebtedness at Face Value 8.0 yrs. 4.09% 864,215
 416,202
     6.5 yrs. 4.15% 1,287,229
 624,964
    
Premium on Fixed-Rate Indebtedness    
 15,133
 7,718
   F    
 10,534
 5,372
   
Debt Issuance Costs, net   (3,537) (1,710)    (4,962) (2,451) 
Total Unconsolidated Indebtedness 8.0 yrs. 4.09% 875,811
 422,210
  6.5 yrs. 4.13% 1,292,801
 627,885
 
Total Mortgage and Other Indebtedness 4.1 yrs. 3.78% $4,382,215
 $3,927,403
     4.5 yrs. 4.67% $4,230,278
 $3,565,362
    


(1)Maturity date assumes full exercise of extension options.
(2)Our share does not reflect our legal ownership percentage due to capital preferences.
(2)On November 2, 2016, affiliates of the Company entered into a definitive agreement providing for an additional joint venture with O'Connor Mall Partners, L.P. for which the property is included.
(3)Borrower is in default and thus in discussions with loan servicer regarding this nonrecourse mortgage loan.
(4)Interest rate fixed via swap agreements as of December 31, 2016.
(5)Maturity date assumes full exercise of extension options.
(6)On July 6, 2016, the Company executed interest rate swap agreements totaling $200.0 million, which effectively fixed the interest rate on this portion of the 2014 Term Loan.2018.
Note: Substantially all of the above mortgage and property related debt is nonrecourse to us.

The following table lists the 7270 unencumbered properties in our portfolio as of December 31, 2016:2018:
Unencumbered Properties
As of December 31, 2016

2018
  Financial Interest
Enclosed Retail Properties:  
Arboretum, The(1)100.0%
Bowie Town Center 100.0%
Boynton Beach Mall 100.0%
Chautauqua Mall 100.0%
Clay Terrace 100.0%
Colonial Park Mall100.0%
Edison Mall 100.0%
Great Lakes Mall100.0%
Gulf View Square(2) 100.0%
Indian Mound Mall 100.0%
Irving Mall 100.0%
Jefferson Valley Mall 100.0%
Lima Mall 100.0%
Lindale Mall 100.0%
Longview Mall 100.0%
Malibu Lumber Yard(1) 100.0%51.0%
Mall at Fairfield Commons, The 100.0%
Maplewood Mall 100.0%
Markland Mall 100.0%
Melbourne Square100.0%
Mesa Mall 100.0%
Morgantown Mall 100.0%
New Towne Mall 100.0%
Northtown Mall 100.0%
Northwoods Mall 100.0%
Oklahoma City Properties(1)(3)(4)Orange Park Mall 99.0%100.0%
Orange Park MallOutlet Collection® | Seattle, The 100.0%
Paddock Mall 100.0%
RiverRolling Oaks Center(2)Mall 100.0%
Rolling OaksSouthern Hills Mall 100.0%
Southern Park Mall 100.0%
Sunland Park Mall 100.0%
Virginia Center Commons(2)100.0%
Waterford Lakes Town Center 100.0%

WestShore Plaza100.0%
  Financial Interest
Community Centers:Open Air Properties:  
Bloomingdale Court 100.0%
Bowie Town Center Strip 100.0%
Charles Towne Square 100.0%
Chesapeake Center 100.0%
Countryside Plaza 100.0%
Dare Centre 100.0%
DeKalb Plaza 100.0%
Empire East 100.0%
Fairfax Court 100.0%
Fairfield Town Center 100.0%

Gaitway Plaza(3)
 99.0%Financial Interest
Gateway Centers(1)Gaitway Plaza(2)96.0%
Greenwood Plus 100.0%
Greenwood PlusHenderson Square 100.0%
Keystone Shoppes 100.0%
Lake Plaza 100.0%
Lake View Plaza 100.0%
Lima Center 100.0%
Lincoln Crossing 100.0%
MacGregor Village 100.0%
Markland Plaza 100.0%
Martinsville Plaza 100.0%
Matteson Plaza100.0%
Morgantown Commons 100.0%
Northwood Plaza 100.0%
Plaza at Buckland Hills, The 100.0%
Richardson Square 100.0%
Rockaway Commons 100.0%
Rockaway Town Plaza 100.0%
Royal Eagle Plaza 100.0%
Shops at North East Mall, The 100.0%
St. Charles Towne Plaza 100.0%
Tippecanoe Plaza 100.0%
University Center 100.0%
University Town Plaza 100.0%
Village Park Plaza 100.0%
Washington Plaza 100.0%
West Town Corners(3)Corners(2) 100.0%
Westland Park Plaza(3)Plaza(2)100.0%
Whitehall Mall 100.0%
Wolf Ranch 100.0%


(1)On November 2, 2016, affiliatesThis property is part of the Company entered into a definitive agreement providing for an additional joint venture with O'Connor Mall Partners, L.P. for whichJoint Venture II, as discussed in Part II, Item 7 and Note 5 of the property is included.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements presented in Part IV, Item 15.
(2)Property is held-for-sale as of December 31, 2016.
(3)We receive substantially all the economic benefit of the property due to a capital preference.
(4)Includes the following properties: Classen Curve, Nichols Hills Plaza, and The Triangle @ Classen Curve.

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings
We are involved from time-to-time in various legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business, including, but not limited to, commercial disputes, environmental matters, and litigation in connection with transactions including acquisitions and divestitures. We believe that such litigation, claims and administrative proceedings will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position or our results of operations. We record a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount of our exposure can be reasonably estimated.
Item 4.    Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Part II
Item 5.    Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
WPG Inc.
Market Information
WPG Inc.'s common shares are traded on the NYSE under the symbol "WPG." The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices per common share and the dividends declared per common share:
  
Price Per
Common Share
  
  
Dividend
Declared Per
Common
Share
  High Low 
2016  
  
  
First Quarter $11.00
 $7.41
 $0.25
Second Quarter $12.17
 $9.23
 $0.25
Third Quarter $14.15
 $10.94
 $0.25
Fourth Quarter $12.37
 $9.44
 $0.25
  
Price Per
Common Share
  
  
Dividend
Declared Per
Common
Share
  High Low 
2015      
First Quarter $18.21
 $16.04
 $0.25
Second Quarter $16.72
 $12.98
 $0.25
Third Quarter $14.29
 $11.35
 $0.25
Fourth Quarter $12.63
 $9.85
 $0.25
The closing price for WPG Inc.'s common shares, as reported by the NYSE at December 31, 2016, was $10.41 per share.
  Distribution Declared Per Common Share
  2018 2017
1st Quarter $0.25
 $0.25
2nd Quarter $0.25
 $0.25
3rd Quarter $0.25
 $0.25
4th Quarter $0.25
 $0.25
Stockholder Information
As of February 22, 2017,20, 2019, there were 1,4601,339 holders of record of WPG Inc.'s common shares.
Distribution Information
WPG Inc. must pay a minimum amount of dividends to maintain its status as a REIT. WPG Inc.'s future dividends and future distributions of WPG L.P. will be determined by WPG Inc.'s Board of Directors based on actual results of operations, cash available for dividends and limited partner distributions, cash reserves as deemed necessary for capital and operating expenditures, and the amount required to maintain WPG Inc.'s status as a REIT. We announced a policy to pay a quarterly cash distribution at an annualized rate of $1.00 per common share/unit, which continues in effect as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Common share/unit distributions paid during 2016each of 2018 and 20152017 aggregated $1.00 per share/unit, respectively.

unit.
WPG Inc. 7.5% Series H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series H Preferred Shares") and 6.875% Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series I Preferred Shares") that were issued on January 15, 2015 in connection with the Merger each pay cumulative dividends, and therefore WPG Inc. is obligated to pay the dividends for these shares in each fiscal period in which the shares remain outstanding. Further, WPG L.P. issued 7.3% Series I-1 Preferred Units (the "Series I-1 Preferred Units") which pay cumulative distributions, and therefore we are obligated to pay the distributions for these units in each fiscal period in which the units remain outstanding. The aggregate preferred obligation is approximately $14.3 million per year.

WPG L.P.
Market Information
There is no established public trading market for WPG L.P.'s units, including the preferred units, the transfers of which are restricted by the terms of WPG L.P.'s limited partnership agreement. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, WPG L.P.'s distributions declared per common unit:
 Distribution Declared Per Common Unit Distribution Declared Per Common Unit
 2016 2015 2018 2017
1st Quarter $0.25
 $0.25
 $0.25
 $0.25
2nd Quarter $0.25
 $0.25
 $0.25
 $0.25
3rd Quarter $0.25
 $0.25
 $0.25
 $0.25
4th Quarter $0.25
 $0.25
 $0.25
 $0.25
Unitholder Information
As of February 22, 2017,20, 2019, there were 268237 holders of record of WPG L.P.'s common units.
Distribution Information
Included in WPG Inc.'s "Distribution Information" discussion above.
Operating Partnership Units and Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
WPG L.P. issued 31,575,487 common units of limited partnership interest to third parties related to the separation from SPG on May 28, 2014.
On June 20, 2014, in connection with a property acquisition, WPG L.P. issued 1,173,678 common units of limited partnership interest to a third party. The issuance of the common units was effected in reliance upon an exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"). We relied on the exemption based on representations given by the aforementioned third party.
On January 15, 2015, in connection with the Merger, WPG L.P. issued 1,621,695 common units of limited partnership interest and 130,592 WPG L.P. Series I-1 Preferred Units to third parties.
Additionally, long-term incentive units ("LTIP") of limited partnership interest have been previously issued to executives of the Company from our equity incentive compensation plan in connection with our equity compensation awards. See Note 9 - "Equity" in the Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements. Holders of common units of limited partnership interest receive distributions per unit in the same manner as distributions on a per common share basis to WPG Inc.'s common shareholders of beneficial interest.
Common shares to be issued upon redemption of common units of limited partnership interest would be issued in reliance on an exemption from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act").
Issuances Under Equity Compensation Plans (WPG Inc. and WPG L.P.)
For information regarding the securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans, see Item 12 of this report.

Item 6.    Selected Financial Data
The following tables set forth selected financial data for WPG Inc. and WPG L.P. The consolidated and combined statements of operations include the consolidated accounts of the Company and the combined accounts of SPG Businesses. Accordingly, the results presented for the year ended December 31, 2014 reflect the aggregate operations and changes in cash flows and equity on a carve-out basis of the SPG Businesses for the period from January 1, 2014 through May 27, 2014 and on a consolidated basis of the Company subsequent to May 27, 2014 following our separation from SPG. The financial statements for the periods prior to the separation are prepared on a carve-out basis from the consolidated financial statements of SPG using the historical results of operations and bases of the assets and liabilities of the transferred businesses and including allocations from SPG.
The combined historical financial statements prior to the separation do not necessarily include all of the expenses that would have been incurred had we been operating as a separate, stand-alone entity and may not necessarily reflect our results of operations, financial position and cash flows had we been a stand-alone company during the periods presented prior to the separation. Our combined historical financial statements include charges related to certain SPG corporate functions, including senior management, property management, legal, leasing, development, marketing, human resources, finance, public reporting, tax and information technology. These expenses have been charged based on direct usage or benefit where identifiable, with the remainder charged on a pro rata basis of revenues, headcount, square footage, number of transactions or other measures. We consider the expense allocation methodology and results to be reasonable for all periods presented. However, the charges may not be indicative of the actual expenses that would have been incurred had WPG operated as an independent, publicly-traded company for the periods presented prior to the separation. Post-separation, WPG now incurs additional costs associated with being an independent, publicly traded company, primarily from newly established or expanded corporate functions.
The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto and with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations". Other financial data we believe is important in understanding trends in our business is also included in the tables. The amounts in the below tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.


 Year Ended December 31, For the Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Operating Data:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
    
Total revenue $843,475
 $921,356
 $660,978
 $626,289
 $623,927
 $723,305
 $758,122
 $843,475
 $921,356
 $660,978
Depreciation and amortization (281,150) (332,469) (197,890) (182,828) (189,187) (257,796) (258,740) (281,150) (332,469) (197,890)
Spin-off, merger and transaction costs (29,607) (31,653) (47,746) 
 
 
 
 (29,607) (31,653) (47,746)
Other operating expenses (325,846) (375,520) (238,205) (216,441) (220,369) (289,873) (287,651) (325,846) (375,520) (238,205)
Impairment loss (21,879) (147,979) 
 
 
 
 (66,925) (21,879) (147,979) 
Operating income 184,993
 33,735
 177,137
 227,020
 214,371
Interest expense, net (136,225) (139,923) (82,428) (55,058) (58,844) (141,987) (126,541) (136,225) (139,923) (82,428)
Income and other taxes (2,232) (849) (1,215) (196) (165) (1,532) (3,417) (2,232) (849) (1,215)
(Loss) income from unconsolidated entities (1,745) (1,247) 973
 1,416
 1,028
Income (loss) from unconsolidated entities 541
 1,395
 (1,745) (1,247) 973
Gain on extinguishment of debt, net 34,612
 
 
 
 
 51,395
 90,579
 34,612
 
 
(Loss) gain upon acquisition of controlling interests and on sale of interests in properties, net (1,987) 4,162
 110,988
 14,152
 
Gain (loss) upon acquisition of controlling interests and on sale of interests in properties, net 24,602
 124,771
 (1,987) 4,162
 110,988
Net income (loss) $77,416
 $(104,122) $205,455
 $187,334
 $156,390
 $108,655
 $231,593
 $77,416
 $(104,122) $205,455
WPG Inc.:                    
Net income (loss) $77,416
 $(104,122) $205,455
 $187,334
 $156,390
 $108,655
 $231,593
 $77,416
 $(104,122) $205,455
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests (10,285) 18,825
 (35,426) (31,853) (26,659) (15,051) (34,530) (10,285) 18,825
 (35,426)
Preferred share dividends (14,032) (15,989) 
 
 
 (14,032) (14,032) (14,032) (15,989) 
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders $53,099
 $(101,286) $170,029
 $155,481
 $129,731
 $79,572
 $183,031
 $53,099
 $(101,286) $170,029
Earnings (loss) per common share, basic and diluted $0.29
 $(0.55) $1.10
 $1.00
 $0.84
 $0.42
 $0.98
 $0.29
 $(0.55) $1.10
WPG L.P.:                    
Net income (loss) $77,416
 $(104,122) $205,455
 $187,334
 $156,390
 $108,655
 $231,593
 $77,416
 $(104,122) $205,455
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests (11) (286) 
 (213) (259) (76) (68) (11) (286) 
Preferred unit distributions (14,272) (16,218) 
 
 
 (14,272) (14,272) (14,272) (16,218) 
Net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders $63,133
 $(120,626) $205,455
 $187,121
 $156,131
 $94,307
 $217,253
 $63,133
 $(120,626) $205,455
Earnings (loss) per common unit, basic and diluted $0.29
 $(0.55) $1.10
 $1.00
 $0.84
 $0.42
 $0.98
 $0.29
 $(0.55) $1.10
Cash Flow Data:  
  
  
  
  
Cash Flow Data: (1)    
  
    
Operating activities $289,798
 $310,763
 $277,640
 $336,434
 $350,703
 $287,245
 $324,631
 $288,987
 $310,882
 $279,417
Investing activities $(125,942) $(705,482) $(234,432) $(92,608) $(71,551) $(179,828) $93,850
 $(124,485) $(689,932) $(225,271)
Financing activities $(220,756) $402,204
 $39,703
 $(248,955) $(270,777) $(116,534) $(436,793) $(231,148) $403,102
 $39,703
Other Financial Data:  
  
  
  
  
      
  
  
FFO(1) $398,091
 $375,271
 $295,051
 $359,107
 $348,327
Distributions per common share/unit(2) $1.00
 $1.00
 $0.50
 N/A
 N/A
FFO(2) $386,819
 $452,128
 $398,091
 $375,271
 $295,051
Distributions per common share/unit(3) $1.00
 $1.00
 $1.00
 $1.00
 $0.50
 As of December 31, As of December 31,
 2016 2015 (3) 2014 2013 2012 2018 2017 2016 2015 (4) 2014
Balance Sheet Data:  
  
  
  
  
    
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents $59,353
 $116,253
 $108,768
 $25,857
 $30,986
 $42,542
 $52,019
 $59,353
 $116,253
 $108,768
Total assets $5,107,466
 $5,459,609
 $3,528,003
 $3,002,658
 $3,093,961
 $4,361,288
 $4,451,407
 $5,107,466
 $5,459,609
 $3,528,003
Mortgages and other debt $3,506,404
 $3,648,601
 $2,348,864
 $918,614
 $926,159
 $2,937,477
 $2,897,609
 $3,506,404
 $3,648,601
 $2,348,864
Redeemable noncontrolling interests $10,660
 $6,132
 $
 $
 $
 $3,265
 $3,265
 $10,660
 $6,132
 $
Cumulative redeemable preferred stock $202,576
 $202,576
 $202,576
 $202,576
 $
Total equity $1,262,811
 $1,407,373
 $958,041
 $1,884,525
 $1,954,856
 $1,148,271
 $1,267,122
 $1,262,811
 $1,407,373
 $958,041

(1)In 2018, we adopted accounting guidance which requires that the statement of cash flows explain the change during the reporting period in the total of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. This resulted in the reclassification of restricted cash within the statement of cash flows for all periods presented.
(2)FFO does not represent cash flow from operations as defined by GAAP and may not be reflective of WPG's operating performance due to changes in WPG's capital structure in connection with the separation and distribution. We use FFO as a supplemental measure of our operating performance. For a definition of FFO as well as a discussion of its uses and inherent limitations, please refer to "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below.
(2)(3)Distributions per common share/unit are only applicable for periods after our separation from SPG on May 28, 2014 when we first issued common shares and units as a separate stand-alone entity.
(3)(4)As a result of the Merger which closed on January 15, 2015 (net of the impact of the O'Connor Joint Venture I transaction which closed on June 1, 2015), our assets, liabilities and equity as of December 31, 2015 increased significantly over our assets, liabilities and equity as of December 31, 2014.


Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated and combined financial statements and notes thereto that are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Capitalized terms not defined in this Item 7 shall have the definitions ascribed to those terms in Items 1-6 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview—Basis of Presentation
WPG Inc. is an Indiana corporation that operates as a self‑administered and self‑managed REIT, under the Code. REITsWPG Inc. will generally not be liablequalify as a REIT for U.S. federal corporate income taxestax purposes as long as they continueit continues to distribute not less than 100%at least 90% of theirits REIT taxable income, exclusive of net capital gains, and satisfy certain other requirements. WPG Inc. will generally be allowed a deduction against its U.S. federal income tax liability for dividends paid by it to REIT shareholders, thereby reducing or eliminating any corporate level taxation to WPG Inc. WPG L.P. is WPG Inc.'s majority‑owned limited partnership subsidiary that owns, develops and manages, through its affiliates, all of WPG Inc.'s real estate properties and other assets. WPG Inc. is the sole general partner of WPG L.P. On May 28, 2014, WPG separated from SPG through the distribution of 100% of the outstanding units of WPG L.P. to the owners of SPG L.P. and 100% of the outstanding shares of WPG Inc. to the SPG common shareholders in a tax-free distribution. Prior to the separation, WPG Inc. and WPG L.P. were wholly owned subsidiaries of the SPG Businesses. On January 15, 2015, the Company acquired Glimcher Realty Trust in a stock and cash transaction valued at approximately $4.2 billion, including the assumption of debt. As of December 31, 2016,2018, our assets consisted of material interests in 114108 shopping centers in the United States, consisting of community centersopen air properties and enclosed retail properties, comprised of approximately 6358 million square feet of managed GLA.
The consolidated and combined financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20162018 and December 31, 20152017 include the accounts of WPG Inc. and WPG L.P., as well as their wholly-owned subsidiaries. The consolidated and combined statements of operations include the consolidated accounts of the Company and the combined accounts of the SPG Businesses. Accordingly, the results presented for the year ended December 31, 2014 reflect the aggregate operations and changes in cash flows and equity on a carve-out basis of the SPG Businesses for the period from January 1, 2014 through May 27, 2014 and on a consolidated basis of the Company subsequent to May 27, 2014.Company. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidationconsolidation.
Leadership Changes and combination. WPG L.P. has filed a trademark application withSeverance Impacting Financial Results
2019 Activity
On February 5, 2019, the United States TrademarkCompany’s Executive Vice President, Head of Open Air Centers, was terminated without cause from his position and Patent Office for the name "Washington Prime Group."
The combined financial statements priorreceived severance payments and other benefits pursuant to the separation includeterms and conditions of his employment agreement. In addition, the allocationCompany terminated, without cause, additional non-executive personnel in the Property Management department as part of certain assetsan effort to reduce overhead costs. The Company expects to record aggregate severance charges of approximately $1.9 million, including $0.1 million of non-cash stock compensation in the form of accelerated vesting of equity incentive awards.
2018 Activity
On May 7, 2018, the Company's Executive Vice President, Property Management was terminated without cause from his position and liabilities that had historically been held at the SPG corporate level but which are specifically identifiable or allocablereceived severance payments and other benefits pursuant to the SPG Businesses. Cashterms and cash equivalents, short-term investmentsconditions of his employment agreement. In addition, the Company terminated without cause additional non-executive personnel in the Property Management department. In connection with and restricted funds held by SPG were not allocated to the SPG Businesses unless the cash or investments were held by an entity that was transferred to WPG. Long-term unsecured debt and short-term borrowings were not allocated to the SPG Businesses as nonepart of the debtaforementioned management and personnel changes, the Company recorded by SPG is directly attributable to or guaranteed byaggregate severance charges of $2.0 million, including $0.5 million of non-cash stock compensation in the SPG Businesses. All intercompany transactionsform of accelerated vesting of equity incentive awards, which costs are included in general and accounts have been eliminated. The total net effect of the settlement of these intercompany transactions is reflectedadministrative expense in the consolidated and combined statements of cash flow as a financing activity.
The combined historical financial statements prior to the separation do not necessarily include all of the expenses that would have been incurred had we been operating as a separate, stand-alone entityoperations and may not necessarily reflect our results of operations, financial position and cash flows had we been a stand-alone company during the periods presented prior to the separation. Our combined historical financial statements include charges related to certain SPG corporate functions, including senior management, property management, legal, leasing, development, marketing, human resources, finance, public reporting, tax and information technology costs. These expenses have been charged based on direct usage or benefit where identifiable, with the remainder charged on a pro rata basis of revenues, headcount, square footage, number of transactions or other measures. We consider the expense allocation methodology and results to be reasonable for all periods presented. However, the charges may not be indicative of the actual expenses that would have been incurred had WPG operated as an independent, publicly traded company for the periods presented prior to the separation.
Prior to the separation, WPG Inc. entered into agreements with SPG under which SPG provided various services to us relating primarily to the legacy SPG Businesses, including accounting, asset management, development, human resources, information technology, leasing, legal, marketing, public reporting and tax. The charges for the services were based on an hourly or per transaction fee arrangement and pass-through of out-of-pocket costs. The underlying agreements expired effective May 31, 2016.
In connection with the separation, we incurred $38.9 million of expenses, including investment banking, legal, accounting, tax and other professional fees, which are included in spin-off costscomprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2014 in the consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

The Merger
On January 15, 2015, the Company acquired GRT as part of the Merger. In the Merger, GRT's common shareholders received, for each GRT common share, $14.02 consisting of $10.40 in cash and 0.1989 of a share of the WPG Inc.'s common stock valued at $3.62 per GRT common share, based on the closing price of the WPG Inc.'s common stock on the Merger closing date. Approximately 29.9 million shares of WPG Inc.'s common stock were issued to GRT shareholders in the Merger, and WPG L.P. issued to WPG Inc. a like number of common units as consideration for the common shares issued. Additionally, included in the consideration were operating partnership units held by limited partners and preferred stock as noted below. In connection with the closing of the Merger, an indirect subsidiary of WPG L.P. was merged into GRT's operating partnership. In the Merger, we acquired material interests in the Merger Properties comprised of approximately 15.8 million square feet of GLA and assumed additional mortgages on 14 properties with a fair value of approximately $1.4 billion. The combined company was renamed WP Glimcher Inc. in May 2015 upon receiving shareholder approval.
In the Merger, the preferred stock of GRT was converted into preferred stock of WPG Inc., and WPG L.P. issued to WPG Inc. preferred units as consideration for the preferred shares issued. Additionally, each outstanding unit of GRT's operating partnership held by limited partners was converted into 0.7431 of a unit of WPG L.P. Further, each outstanding stock option in respect of GRT common stock was converted into a WPG Inc. option, and certain other GRT equity awards were assumed by WPG Inc. and converted into equity awards in respect of WPG Inc.'s common shares.
Concurrent with the closing of the Merger, GRT completed a transaction with SPG under which affiliates of SPG acquired Jersey Gardens in Elizabeth, New Jersey, and University Park Village in Fort Worth, Texas, properties previously owned by affiliates of GRT, for an aggregate purchase price of $1.09 billion, including SPG's assumption of approximately $405.0 million of associated mortgage indebtedness (the "Property Sale").
The cash portion of the Merger consideration was funded by the Property Sale and draws under the Bridge Loan (see "Financing and Debt" below). During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred $31.7 million and $8.8 million of costs related to the Merger, respectively, which are included in merger, restructuring and transaction costs in the consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Leadership Transition and Corporate Name Change
2015 Activity
On June 1, 2015, the Company announced a management transition plan through which Mr. Mark S. Ordan, the then Executive Chairman of the WPG Inc. Board of Directors (the "Board"), transitioned to serve as an active non-executive Chairman of the Board and provide consulting services to the Company under a Transition and Consulting Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2016 (see "2016 Activity" below for subsequent matters related to Mr. Ordan). Additionally, the Company reduced staff formerly located in its Bethesda, Maryland-based transition operations group led by Mr. C. Marc Richards, the Company’s then Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer, who departed the Company on January 15, 2016. Other senior executives from the Bethesda office who departed the Company at the end of 2015 were Mr. Michael J. Gaffney, then Executive Vice President, Head of Capital Markets (who served as a consultant to the Company through March 31, 2016), and Ms. Farinaz S. Tehrani, then Executive Vice President, Legal and Compliance. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company incurred $8.6 million of related severance costs, consisting of $4.6 million in cash severance and approximately $4.0 million in non-cash stock compensation charges, which are included in the total merger, restructuring and transactions costs disclosed above.2018.
2016 Activity
On June 20, 2016, (the “Executive Separation Date”), the Company announced the following leadership changes effective as of the Executive Separation Date:changes: (1) the resignation of Mr. Michael P. Glimcher as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of the Board; (2) the appointment of Mr. Louis G. Conforti, a current Board member, as Interim Chief Executive Officer; (3) the resignation of Mr. Mark S. Ordan as non-executive Chairman of the Board; and (4) the resignation of Mr. Niles C. Overly from the Board. Additionally, on June 16,In July of 2016, the Board appointed Mr. Robert P. Demchak as Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary of the Company. Also, on the Executive Separation Date, the Board appointed Mr. Robert J. Laikin, a current Board member, as non-executive Chairman of the Board and also appointed Mr. John F. Levy and Mr. John J. Dillon III as independent directors. On August 30, 2016, the Board appointed Ms. Sheryl G. von Blucher as an independent director upon the retirement of Mr. Marvin L. White. The Board currently consists of five independent members: Messrs. Laikin, Dillon, Levy, and Mmes. von Blucher and Jacqueline R. Soffer as well as Messrs. Conforti and Ordan who are not independent. On July 14, 2016, the Company’s Executive Vice President, Director of Leasing and Senior Vice President of Human Resources were terminated without cause from their positions and received severance payments and other benefits pursuant to the terms and conditions of their respective Severance Benefits Agreements. In addition to these July 14, 2016 executive terminations, the Company terminated some additional executive and non-executive personnel as part of an effort to reduce overhead costs. On October 6, 2016, the

Company announced that Mr. Conforti would serve as the Company's Chief Executive Officer for a term ending December 31, 2019, subject to early termination clauses and automatic renewals pursuant to his employment agreement.
In connection with and as part of the aforementioned management changes, the Company recorded aggregate charges of $29.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, of which $25.5 million related to severance and restructuring-related costs, including $9.5 million of non-cash stock compensation for accelerated vesting of equity incentive awards, and $4.1 million related to fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Company's investigation of various strategic alternatives, which costs are included in merger, restructuring and transaction costs in the consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss)income.

The Facility
On January 22, 2018, WPG L.P. amended and restated $1.0 billion of the existing unsecured revolving credit facility, or "Revolver" and unsecured term loan, or "Term Loan" (collectively known as the "Facility"). DuringThe recasted Facility can be increased to $1.5 billion through currently uncommitted Facility commitments. Excluding the accordion feature, the recasted Facility includes a $650.0 million Revolver and $350.0 million Term Loan. The interest rates for the Revolver and Term Loan remained substantially consistent with the previous terms. When considering extension options, the recasted Facility will mature on December 30, 2022. The $350.0 million Term Loan was fully funded at closing, and the Company used the proceeds to repay the $270.0 million outstanding on the June 2015 Term Loan and to pay down the Revolver.
Southgate Mall
On April 24, 2018, the Company closed on the acquisition of Southgate Mall, located in Missoula, Montana, for $58.0 million. The enclosed retail property contains approximately 631,000 square feet of GLA and is anchored by a recently constructed AMC Theater, a new Lucky’s Market grocer that replaced a portion of a former Sears, J.C. Penney (non-owned) and Dillard’s (non-owned) and is the dominant retail center in this secondary market, with no competitive destination retail property located within 130 miles.
On September 27, 2018, an affiliate of WPG Inc.'s annual meeting closed on a $35.0 million full-recourse mortgage note payable with a three-year term and a fixed rate of shareholders4.48% secured by Southgate Mall. The mortgage note payable requires interest only payments and will initially mature on August 30, 2016, the common shareholders approved a proposalSeptember 27, 2021, subject to change WPG Inc.'s name backtwo one-year extensions available at our option subject to Washington Prime Group Inc.
Conveyance of Glimcher Domain Name and Rights to Mr. Michael P. Glimcher
In connectioncompliance with the resignation of Mr. Michael P. Glimcher as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairmanterms of the Board,underlying loan agreement and payment of customary extension fees. The proceeds were used to reduce corporate debt and for ongoing redevelopment efforts.
Sears Parcel Acquisitions
On April 11, 2018, we acquired, through a sale-leaseback transaction, four Sears department stores and adjacent Sears Auto Centers at Longview Mall, located in Longview, Texas; Polaris Fashion Place®, located in Columbus, Ohio; Southern Hills Mall, located in Sioux City, Iowa; and Town Center at Aurora, located in Aurora, Colorado. The purchase price was approximately $28.5 million and was funded by a combination of $13.4 million from our Facility, $9.7 million from the first tranche of the Four Corners transaction, as discussed in "Overview - Basis of Presentation - Outparcel Sale," and $5.4 million from our joint venture partner related to their pro-rata share of the joint venture that owns Polaris Fashion Place®. We have control of these stores for future redevelopment and Sears, depending on the outcome of their bankruptcy proceedings, will continue to operate under new leases, providing aggregate minimum rent under these leases of approximately $1.25 million per annum. In addition, under the terms of these leases, Sears is responsible for paying common area maintenance charges, taxes, insurance and utilities while they operate the stores. Other than the store at Town Center at Aurora, Sears has announced plans to close the remaining three stores in the first quarter of 2019.
Sears Bankruptcy
On October 15, 2018, Sears Holdings filed voluntary petitions under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code and announced additional store closings. As of December 31, 2018, we had 35 Sears stores totaling approximately 4.9 million square feet of GLA within the portfolio of properties we manage, which were responsible for approximately 0.8% of our total annualized base minimum rents. We own 17 of the stores, Sears owns eight stores and third parties (including Seritage Growth Properties) own 10 stores. Sears has announced plans to close a number of stores during the first quarter of 2019. Additionally, Sears has entered into an asset purchase agreement which was approved by the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”) on February 8, 2019. Certain of our leases may be assumed and assigned as part of the asset purchase transaction, while other stores may be closed as part of Sears’ ongoing store closings.  After the announced closures, we expect to have 10 Sears stores operating in our portfolio, subject to the outcome of the ongoing proceedings. In addition to the risk of lost base minimum rent from Sears, co-tenancy clauses in leases for in-line retailers may trigger as a result of Sears store closures, and losses could be significant. We considered the impact of the bankruptcy announcement in our evaluation of impairment, including announced closures, noting no impairment charges were warranted as of December 31, 2018. We are in various stages of redevelopment for many of these stores (see details under "Development Activity").
Outparcel Sale
During the year ended December 31, 2018, we completed the sale of various tranches of restaurant outparcels to FCPT Acquisitions, LLC ("Four Corners") pursuant to the purchase and sale agreement executed on September 20, 2017 between the Company agreedand Four Corners.

The following table summarizes the key terms of each tranche (dollars in thousands):
Tranche Sales Date Parcels Sold Purchase Price Sales Proceeds
Tranche 1 January 12, 2018 10
 $13,692
 $13,506
Tranche 2 June 29, 2018 5
 9,503
 9,423
Tranche 3 July 27, 2018 2
 4,607
 4,530
Tranche 4 October 31, 2018 2
 1,718
 1,714
Tranche 5 November 16, 2018 1
 3,195
 3,166
    20
 $32,715
 $32,339
The Company used the proceeds to assign to Mr. Glimcher our right, title and interest to the glimcher.com internet domain name, the Glimcher logo, and irrevocably consent to Mr. Glimcher’s usefund a portion of the “Glimcher” name in any future trade name or business endeavor. This agreement was effective on August 30, 2016, the date we received shareholder approvalacquisition of the Sears parcels on April 11, 2018 as discussed above, to reduce corporate name change from WP Glimcher Inc.debt, and to Washington Prime Group Inc. Mr. Glimcher consentedfund ongoing redevelopment efforts. On January 18, 2019, we completed the sixth tranche of restaurant outparcels. This tranche consisted of eight restaurant outparcels. Additionally on February 11, 2019, we closed on the sale of one additional restaurant outparcel. The allocated purchase price was approximately $12.2 million, and the net proceeds of approximately $12.1 million were used to fund ongoing redevelopment efforts and for general corporate purposes. The Company expects to close on the Company’s useremaining 15 outparcels for approximately $25.3 million during the first half of the “Glimcher” name2019, subject to due diligence and Glimcher logo with respect to our subsidiaries and properties for a period of 12 months following the Executive Separation Date.closing conditions.
The O'Connor Joint VentureVentures
On June 1, 2015, we completed aThe Company has two joint venture transactionventures with O'Connor Mall Partners, L.P. ("O'Connor"), an unaffiliated third party, with respect to.
The O'Connor Joint Venture I
This investment consists of a 51% noncontrolling interest held by the ownership and operationCompany in a portfolio of five of the Company’s enclosed retail properties and certain related out-parcels (the "O'Connor Joint Venture") acquiredoutparcels, consisting of the following: The Mall at Johnson City located in the Merger, which were valued at approximately $1.625 billion. We retained a 51% non-controlling interest in the O'Connor Joint Venture. The transaction generated net proceeds, after taking into consideration the assumption of debt (including the new loans onJohnson City, Tennessee; Pearlridge Center located in Aiea, Hawaii; Polaris Fashion Place®; Scottsdale Quarter® located in Scottsdale, Arizona; and Scottsdale Quarter)Town Center Plaza (which consists of Town Center Plaza and costs associated with the transaction, of approximately $432 million (including $28.7 millionadjacent Town Center Crossing) located in Leawood, Kansas. We retain management, leasing, and development responsibilities for the partial reimbursement of the Scottsdale Quarter development costs), which was used to repay a portion of the Bridge Loan (for definition, see "Financing and Debt" below). We deconsolidated the properties in the O'Connor Joint Venture (the "O'Connor Properties"I.

On April 11, 2018, the O'Connor Joint Venture I closed on the acquisition of the Sears department store located at Polaris Fashion Place® in connection with our acquisition of additional Sears department stores (see details under "Overview - Basis of Presentation - Sears Parcel Acquisitions").
On March 2, 2017, the O'Connor Joint Venture I acquired an additional section at Pearlridge Center for a gross purchase price of $70.0 million. Pearlridge Center is currently comprised of two distinct enclosed venues commonly referred to as Uptown and recorded a gain related to this saleDowntown. The acquired section consists of $4.2 million,approximately 153,000 square feet, which is included in gain upon acquisitionpart of controlling interestsUptown (and referenced herein as Pearlridge Uptown II), and is anchored by Ross Dress for Less and TJ Maxx. Subsequent to the purchase, the joint venture placed secured debt on salethe property (see below for details). Our share of interests in properties for the year ended December 31, 2015 withinpurchase price was funded by a combination of our share of the consolidatedsecured debt and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). We retained day-to-day management and leasing responsibilities foravailability on our credit facility.
On March 30, 2017, the O'Connor Properties.Joint Venture I closed on a $43.2 million non-recourse mortgage note payable with an eight year term and a fixed interest rate of 4.071% secured by Pearlridge Uptown II. The mortgage note payable requires monthly interest only payments until April 1, 2019, at which time monthly interest and principal payments are due until maturity. Our pro-rata share of the mortgage note payable issuance is $22.0 million.
On March 29, 2017, the O'Connor Joint Venture I closed on a $55.0 million non-recourse mortgage note payable with a ten year term and a fixed interest rate of 4.36% secured by sections of Scottsdale Quarter® known as Block K and Block M. The mortgage note payable requires monthly interest only payments until May 1, 2022, at which time monthly interest and principal payments are due until maturity. Our pro-rata share of the mortgage note payable issuance is $28.1 million.
The O'Connor Joint Venture II
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the O'Connor Joint Venture sold its 25% indirect ownership interest in Crescent-SDQ III Venture, LLC to unaffiliated third parties. The Company received a cash distribution from the joint venture at closing of $4.4 million and recorded $0.3 million as our share of the joint venture's gain, based on our pro-rata ownership interest in the O'Connor Joint Venture, which is recorded in (loss) income from unconsolidated entities on the consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
On November 2, 2016, affiliates of the Company entered into a definitive agreement providing for2017, we completed an additional joint venture transaction with O'Connor with respect to the ownership and operation of seven of the Company's retail properties which were valued at approximately $608 million,and certain related outparcels, consisting of the following: The Arboretum, located in Austin, Texas; Arbor Hills, located in Ann Arbor, Michigan; Classen Curve and The Triangle at Classen Curve, each located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma and Nichols Hills Plaza, located in Nichols Hills, Oklahoma (the "Oklahoma City Properties," collectively); Gateway Center,Centers, located in Austin, Texas; Malibu Lumber Yard, located in Malibu, California; Palms Crossing I and II, located in McAllen, Texas and The Shops at Arbor Walk, located in Austin, Texas. Texas (the "O'Connor Joint Venture II"). The transaction valued the properties at $598.6 million before closing adjustments and debt assumptions.

Under the terms of the joint venture agreement, the Company will retainwe retained a non-controlling 51% interest in the O'Connor Joint Venture II and sellsold the remaining 49% to O'ConnorO'Connor. The transaction generated net proceeds to the Company of approximately $138.9 million, after taking into consideration costs associated with the transaction and the assumption of debt (including the new mortgage loans on The Arboretum, Gateway Centers, and Oklahoma City Properties which closed prior to the joint venture transaction; see "Financing & Debt" below for net proceeds of approximately $350 million, includingto the placement ofCompany from the new mortgage debt,loans), which will bewe used to reduce the Company's debt as well as for general corporate purposes. At the time of closing, we deconsolidated the properties included in the O'Connor Joint Venture II and recorded a gain in connection with this partial sale of $126.1 million, which is included in gain (loss) on disposition of interests in properties, net in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The Company willgain was recorded pursuant to ASC 360-20 and calculated based upon proceeds received, less 49% of the book value of the deconsolidated net assets. Our retained 51% non-controlling equity method interest was valued at historical cost based upon the pro rata book value of the retained interest in the net assets. We retain management and leasing responsibilities offor the properties. On November 18, 2016, O'Connor completed its due diligence and the escrow deposit of $18.7 million became non-refundable. Subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain closing conditions, the transaction is anticipated to closeproperties included in the second quarterO'Connor Joint Venture II. In connection with the formation of 2017.this joint venture, we recorded transaction costs of approximately $6.4 million as part of our basis in this investment.

Impairment
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company made continued progress to dispose of its remaining noncore properties. On November 10, 2016, the Company sold Richmond Town Square, located in Cleveland, Ohio. Additionally, we sold Virginia Center Commons, located in Glen Allen, Virginia on January 10, 2017 and we sold Gulf View Square, located in Port Richey, Florida and River Oaks Center, located in Chicago, Illinois on February 21, 2017, respectively (see "Acquisitions and Dispositions" below) and have classified these enclosed retail properties as held-for-sale as of December 31, 2016. We compared the fair value of each noncore property to its relative carrying value, which resulted in the recording of an impairment charge of approximately $21.9 million within the consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2016. The impairment charge was attributed to the recent continued declines in the fair value of the properties and executed agreements entered into in 2016 to sell these properties at prices below the carrying value.
During the year ended December 31, 2015, we took an impairment charge of approximately $138 million primarily related to certain noncore properties, in addition to Forest Mall, located in Fond Du Lac, Wisconsin and Northlake Mall, located in Atlanta, Georgia, which were both sold on January 29, 2016, and Knoxville Center, located in Knoxville, Tennessee, which was sold on August 19, 2016. The impairment charge was due to the change in facts and circumstances when we decided to hold the assets for a shorter period which resulted in the carrying value not being recoverable from the projected cash flows.
During the thirdfourth quarter of 2015,2017, a major anchor tenant of Chesapeake Square,Rushmore Mall, located in Chesapeake, Virginia,Rapid City, South Dakota, informed us of their intention to close their store at the property. The impending closure was deemed a triggering event and, therefore, we evaluated this property in conjunction with our quarterly impairment review and preparation of our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. We compared the estimated fair value of $37.5 million to the related carrying value of $75.0 million, which resulted in the recording of an impairment charge of approximately $37.5 million in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2017.
On October 4, 2017, the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement to sell Colonial Park Mall, located in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, to an unaffiliated private real estate investor, which was sold on November 3, 2017. During the third quarter ended September 30, 2015.of 2017, we shortened the hold period used in assessing impairment for this asset, which resulted in the carrying value not being recoverable from the expected cash flows. We compared the fair value measurement of the property to the relatedits relative carrying value, which resulted in the recording of an impairment charge of approximately $9.9$20.9 million in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2015. Furthermore, we transferred ownership2017.
During the first quarter of 2017, the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement to dispose of Morgantown Commons, located in Morgantown, West Virginia, which was sold in the second quarter of 2017. We shortened the hold period used in assessing impairment for the asset during the quarter ended March 31, 2017, which resulted in the carrying value not being recoverable from the expected cash flows. The purchase offer represented the best available evidence of fair value for this propertyproperty. We compared the fair value to the mortgage lender on April 28,carrying value, which resulted in the recording of an impairment charge of approximately $8.5 million in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2017.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, (see "Financingwe recorded an impairment charge of $21.9 million primarily related to noncore properties consisting of Gulf View Square, located in Port Richey, Florida; Richmond Town Square, located in Cleveland, Ohio; River Oaks Center, located in Chicago, Illinois; and Debt - Covenants" below).Virginia Center Commons, located in Glen Allen, Virginia. The impairment charge was attributed to the continued declines in the fair value of the properties and executed agreements entered into in 2016 to sell these properties at prices below the carrying value. Each of the aforementioned noncore properties has been sold in accordance with the Company's strategic objectives.
Hurricane Harvey and Hurricane Irma
During the third quarter of 2017, Hurricane Harvey and Hurricane Irma made landfall in Houston, Texas and Southern Florida, respectively. The Company had 15 assets experience damage attributed to the hurricanes, but no asset sustained catastrophic damage nor was there any loss of life. Further, no asset experienced a significant loss of business or functionality. The Company recognized approximately $900,000 of expense attributed to the damage, repairs and asset write-offs, which was below insurance deductible thresholds.
Business Opportunities
We derive our revenues primarily from retail tenant leases, including fixed minimum rent leases, percentage rent leases based on tenants' sales volumes and reimbursements from tenants for certain expenses. We seek to re-lease our spaces at higher rents and increase our occupancy rates, and to enhance the performance of our properties and increase our revenues by, among other things, adding or replacing anchors or big-boxes,big-box tenants, re-developing or renovating existing properties to increase the leasable square footage, and increasing the productivity of occupied locations through aesthetic upgrades, re-merchandising and/or changes to the retail use of the space. We seek growth in earnings, FFO and cash flows by enhancing the profitability and operation of our properties and investments.

Additionally, we feel there are opportunities to enhance our portfolio and balance sheet through active portfolio management. We believe that there are opportunities for us to acquire additional shopping centers that match our investment and strategic criteria. We invest in real estate properties to maximize total financial return which includes both operating cash flows and capital appreciation. We also seek to dispose of or contribute to a joint venture assets that no longer meet our strategic criteria. These dispositions will be a combination of asset sales and transitions of over-levered properties to lenders.lenders or special servicers.
We consider FFO, net operating income, or NOI, and comparable property NOI (NOI for properties owned and operating in both periods under comparison) to be key measures of operating performance that are not specifically defined by GAAP. We use these measures internally to evaluate the operating performance of our portfolio and provide a basis for comparison with other real estate companies. Reconciliations of these measures to the most comparable GAAP measure are included elsewhere in this report.
Portfolio Data
The portfolio data discussed in this overview includes key operating statistics for the Company (including the Merger Properties for all periods) including ending occupancy, average base minimum rent per square foot and comparable NOI for the core properties owned at December 31, 2016. These reporting metrics exclude the impact of three2018. Towne West Square, located in Wichita, Kansas, and West Ridge Mall, located in Topeka, Kansas were identified as noncore properties and are thus deemed to be from our "core portfolio" or "core properties." Southern Hills Mall is also excluded from the metrics as the management and leasing of the property was transferred during the fourth quarter of 2016.
Core business fundamentals in the overall portfolio during 20162018 were generally stable compared to 2015.2017. Ending occupancy for the core propertiesportfolio was 94.0%93.9% as of December 31, 2016,2018, as compared to 93.5% as of December 31, 2015.2017. Average base minimum rent per square foot for the core portfolio increaseddecreased by 0.2%0.5% when comparing December 31, 20162018 to December 31, 2015.2017. Comparable NOI increased 2.1%decreased 3.0% for the core portfolio and increased 1.8% for the portfolio including the noncore properties when comparing calendar year 20162018 to 2015.

2017. Our core enclosed retail properties had a decrease in comparable NOI of 3.5%, which was driven primarily by the impact of 2018 department store bankruptcies filed and related co-tenancy impact. The core open air properties had a comparable NOI decrease of 1.7% in 2018 when compared to 2017, primarily related to the Toys R Us bankruptcy and lower CAM capital spending in 2018.
The following table sets forth key operating statistics for the combined portfolio of core properties or interests in properties (including the Merger Properties in each period reported):properties:
 December 31, 2016 
%
Change
 December 31, 2015 
%
Change
 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2018 
%
Change
 December 31, 2017 
%
Change
 December 31, 2016
Ending occupancy (1) 94.0% 0.5% 93.5% (0.3)% 93.8% 93.9% 0.4 % 93.5% (1.0)% 94.5%
Average base minimum rent per square foot (2) $21.67
 0.2% $21.63
 1.4 % $21.33
 $21.86
 (0.5)% $21.96
 0.5 % $21.86

(1)Ending occupancy is the percentage of GLA which is leased as of the last day of the reporting period. We include all Company-owned space except for anchors, majors, freestanding office and outlots at our enclosed retail properties in the calculation of ending occupancy. Community centerOpen air property GLA included in the calculation relates to all Company-owned space other than office space. When including the three noncore properties, occupancy at December 31, 2016 was 93.5%.

(2)
Average base minimum rent per square foot is the average base minimum rent charge in effect for the reporting period for all tenants that would qualify to be included in ending occupancy.occupancy.
Current Leasing Activities
During the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, we signed new leases and renewal leases with terms in excess of a year (excluding enclosed retail property anchors, majors, offices and in-line spaces in excess of 10,000 square feet) across the core portfolio, comprising approximately 2,637,5002,188,100 square feet. The average annual initial base minimum rent for new leases was $23.54$23.82 per square foot ("psf") and for renewed leases was $28.91$26.87 psf. For these leases, the average for tenant allowances was $35.28$31.54 psf for new leases and $4.86$5.23 psf for renewals. During the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, we signed new leases and renewal leases with terms in excess of a year (excluding enclosed retail property anchors, majors, offices and in-line spaces in excess of 10,000 square feet) across the comparable core portfolio, comprising approximately 2,371,9002,497,800 square feet. The average annual initial base minimum rent for new leases was $24.08$24.78 psf and for renewed leases was $29.12$25.26 psf. For these leases, the average for tenant allowances was $31.52$36.05 psf for new leases and $6.48$3.40 psf for renewals.
Portfolio Summary
We have provided some of our key operating metrics for our core enclosed retail property portfolio in different tiers. The purpose of the disclosure is to provide some distinction between the characteristics of the core enclosed retail properties. Tier 1 enclosed retail properties generally have higher occupancy, sales productivity and growth profiles, while Tier 2 enclosed retail properties are viable enclosed retail properties with lower productivity and modest growth profiles.

The table below provides some of our key metrics for the core enclosed retail property tiers as well as some key metrics for our community centeropen air property portfolio:
Property Count 
Leased Occupancy %1
 
Store Sales Per Square Foot for 12 Months Ended1
 
Store Occupancy Cost %1
 
% of Total Comp NOI for 12 Months Ended1
Property Count 
Leased Occupancy %1
 
Store Sales Per Square Foot for 12 Months Ended1
 
Store Occupancy Cost %1
 
% of Total Comp NOI for 12 Months Ended1
 12/31/16 12/31/15 12/31/16 12/31/15 12/31/16 12/31/15 12/31/16 
Community Centers52
 95.9% 96.0%         23.7%
Property Count 12/31/18 12/31/17 12/31/18 12/31/17 12/31/18 12/31/17 12/31/18
Open Air Properties 95.6% 95.8%         25.4%
                             
Tier 1 Enclosed retail properties37
 93.6% 93.5% $399
 $398
 12.2% 12.3% 53.7%41
 94.2% 93.3% $399
 $393
 11.7% 12.3% 64.2%
Tier 2- Enclosed retail properties21
 91.1% 89.0% 302
 303
 13.8% 13.8% 22.6%14
 87.7% 87.7% $286
 $284
 13.6% 14.0% 10.4%
Core Enclosed Retail Properties Subtotal58
 92.7% 91.9% $368
 $366
 12.6% 12.7% 76.3%55
 92.8% 92.0% $377
 $371
 12.0% 12.6% 74.6%
                              
Total Core Properties110
 94.0% 93.5%         100.0%
Total Core Portfolio106
 93.9% 93.5%         100.0%
1Metrics only include properties owned as of December 31, 2016. Southern Hills Mall is excluded as it is managed by a third party, although still owned by the Company.2018.

Enclosed Retail Property Tiers
The following table categorizes the enclosed retail properties into the respective tiers as of December 31, 2016:2018:
Tier 1 Tier 2 Noncore(1)NonCore
Arbor HillsMorgantown Mall Anderson Mall Gulf ViewTowne West Square
Arboretum, TheNorthtown Mall Boynton Beach Mall River Oaks CenterWest Ridge Mall
Ashland Town CenterNorthwoods Mall
Charlottesville Fashion Square(2)
 Virginia Center Commons
Bowie Town CenterOklahoma City Properties Chautauqua Mall  
Brunswick SquareColonialOrange Park Mall
Clay TerraceCottonwood Mall
Dayton Mall Indian Mound Mall  
EdisonClay TerracePaddock Mall IrvingLima Mall  
Grand CentralCottonwood MallPearlridge Center 
Lincolnwood Town Center(1)
  
Great LakesDayton MallPolaris Fashion Place Maplewood Mall  
Jefferson ValleyEdison MallPort Charlotte Town Center Mesa
Muncie Mall(2)
  
LimaGrand Central MallScottsdale Quarter New Towne Mall  
LindaleGreat Lakes MallNorthtown Mall
LongviewSouthern Hills Mall Oak Court Mall  
Malibu Lumber YardIrving MallSouthern Park Mall Rolling Oaks Mall  
Jefferson Valley Mall at Fairfield Commons, TheSouthgate Mall Rushmore Mall
Seminole Towne Center(2)
  
Lindale Mall at Johnson City, TheSeminole Towne Center
Markland MallThe Outlet Collection | Seattle Sunland Park Mall  
Melbourne SquareTowne West Square
MorgantownLongview MallValle Vista Mall
Muncie MallWest Ridge Mall
Northwoods Mall
Oklahoma City Properties
Orange Park Mall
Paddock Mall
Pearlridge Center
Polaris Fashion Place
Port Charlotte Town Center
Scottsdale Quarter
Southern Park Mall
The Outlet Collection | Seattle
Town Center at Aurora    
Malibu Lumber YardTown Center Crossing & Plaza    
Mall at Fairfield Commons, TheWaterford Lakes Town Center    
Mall at Johnson City, TheWeberstown Mall    
Markland MallWestminster Mall    
Melbourne SquareWestShore Plaza    
Mesa Mall
(1)Virginia Center Commons was sold on January 10, 2017 and Gulf View Square and River Oaks were sold on February 21, 2017 (see section - "Acquisitions and Dispositions").
1Property has been identified to change tiers in 2019.
2Reclassified as noncore properties in 2019.

Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied resulting in a different presentation of our financial statements.

From time to time, we reevaluate our estimates and assumptions. In the event estimates or assumptions prove to be different from actual results, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current information. Below is a discussion of accounting policies that we consider critical in that they may require complex judgment in their application or require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. For a summary of our significant accounting policies, please refer to Note 3 of the notes to the consolidated and combined financial statements.
We, as a lessor, retain substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the investment properties and account for our leases as operating leases. We generally accrue minimum rents on a straight-line basis over the terms of their respective leases. Many of our retail tenants are also required to pay overage rents based on sales over a stated amount during the lease year. We recognize overage rents only when each tenant's sales exceed its sales threshold as defined in their lease. We amortize any tenant inducements as a reduction of revenue utilizing the straight-line method over the term of the related lease or occupancy term of the tenant, if shorter.
We review investment properties for impairment on a property-by-property basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of investment properties may not be recoverable. These circumstances include, but are not limited to, a decline in a property's cash flows, ending occupancy, estimated market values or our decision to dispose of a property before the end of its estimated useful life. Furthermore, this evaluation is conducted no less frequently than quarterly, irrespective of changes in circumstances. We measure any impairment of investment property when the estimated undiscounted operating income before depreciation and amortization plus its residual value is less than the carrying value of the property. To the extent impairment has occurred, we charge to expense the excess of carrying value of the property over its estimated fair value. We estimate fair value using unobservable data such as operating income, estimated capitalization rates, leasing prospects and local market information. We may decide to sell properties that are held for use and the sale prices of these properties may differ from their carrying values. We also review our investments, including investments in unconsolidated entities, if events or circumstances change indicating that the carrying amount of our investments may not be recoverable. We will record an impairment charge if we determine that a decline in the fair value of the investments below carrying value is other-than-temporary. Changes in economic and operating conditions that occur subsequent to our review of recoverability of investment property and other investments could impact the assumptions used in that assessment and could result in future charges to earnings if assumptions regarding those investments differ from actual results.
To maintain its status as a REIT, WPG Inc. must distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, exclusive of net capital gains in any given year and meet certain asset and income tests. We monitor our business and transactions that may potentially impact WPG Inc.'s REIT status. In the unlikely event that WPG Inc. fails to maintain REIT status, and available relief provisions do not apply, then it would be required to pay federal income taxes at regular corporate income tax rates during the period it did not qualify as a REIT. If WPG Inc. lost its REIT status, it could not elect to be taxed as a REIT for four years unless its failure was due to reasonable cause and certain other conditions were met. As a result, failing to maintain REIT status would result in a significant increase in the income tax expense recorded and paid during those periods.
We make estimates as part of our recording of the purchase price ofproperty acquisitions to the various components of the acquisition based upon the fair value of each component. The most significant components of our allocations are typically the recording of the fair value of buildings as-if-vacant, land and market value of in-place leases. In the case of the fair value of buildings and the recording of the fair value of land and other intangibles, our estimates of the values of these components will affect the amount of depreciation we record over the estimated useful life of the property acquired or the remaining lease term. In the case of the market value of in-place leases, we make our best estimates of the tenants' ability to pay rents based upon the tenants' operating performance at the property, including the competitive position of the property in its market as well as tenant sales, rents per square foot, and overall occupancy cost for the tenants in place at the acquisition date. Our assumptions affect the amount of future revenue that we will recognize over the remaining lease term for the acquired in-place leases.

A variety of costs are incurred in the development and leasing of properties. After determination is made to capitalize a cost, it is allocated to the specific component of a project that is benefited. Determination of when a development project is substantially complete and capitalization must cease involves a degree of professional judgment. The costs of land and buildings under development include specifically identifiable costs. The capitalized costs include pre-construction costs essential to the development of the property, development costs, construction costs, interest costs, real estate taxes, salaries and related costs and other costs incurred during the period of development. We consider a construction project as substantially completed when it is held available for occupancy, and accordingly, cease capitalization of costs upon opening.

New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial AccountingAdoption of New Standards Board ("FASB") issued
On January 1, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)." using the modified retrospective approach. ASU No. 2014-09 revisesrevised GAAP by offering a single comprehensive revenue recognition standard instead of numerous revenue requirements for particular industries or transactions, which sometimes resulted in different accounting for economically similar transactions. An entity has the option to apply the provisions of ASU No. 2014-09 either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying this standard recognized at the date of initial application. On July 9, 2015, the FASB announced it would defer the effective date by one year to December 15, 2017 for annual reporting periods beginning after that date. The FASB also decided to permit early adoption of the standard, but not before the original effective date of December 15, 2016. This new standard will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2018 and at that point certain of our revenue streams will be impacted. The impacted revenue streams primarily consist of fees earned from management, development and leasing services provided to joint ventures in which we own an interest sales of real estate, and other ancillary income earned from our properties. In 2016, these revenues were less than 1%Upon adoption, we recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment to increase equity of consolidated revenue. We expect that fee incomeapproximately $2.5 million related to changes in the revenue recognition pattern of lease commissions earned by the Company from our joint ventures forventures. We do not expect the above-mentioned servicesadoption of ASU 2014-09 to have a material impact to our net income on an ongoing basis.
Additionally, we adopted the clarified scope guidance of ASC 610-20, "Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets" in conjunction with ASU 2014-09, using the modified retrospective approach. ASC 610-20 applies to the sale, transfer and derecognition of nonfinancial assets and in substance nonfinancial assets to noncustomers, including partial sales, and eliminates the guidance specific to real estate in ASC 360-20. With respect to full disposals, the recognition will generally be recognized in a manner consistent with our current measurement and patternspattern of recognition. AsWith respect to partial sales of real estate to joint ventures, the new guidance requires us to recognize a full gain where an equity investment is retained. These transactions could result in a basis difference as we do not expectwill be required to measure our retained equity interest at fair value, whereas the joint venture may continue to measure the assets received at carryover basis. No adjustments were required upon adoption of this standardstandard.
On January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2017-12, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to haveAccounting for Hedging Activities." ASU 2017-12 aims to reduce complexity in cash value hedges of interest rate risk and eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness, generally requiring the entire change in the fair value of the hedging instrument to be presented in the same income statement line as the hedged item. Upon adoption, we recorded a significantcumulative-effect adjustment of $0.6 million between accumulated other comprehensive income and retained earnings.
On January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)" and ASU 2016-18 "Restricted Cash" using a retrospective transition approach, which changed our statements of cash flows and related disclosures for all periods presented. ASU 2016-15 is intended to reduce diversity in practice with respect to how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows and its adoption had no impact on our financial statements. ASU 2016-18 requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in total of cash, cash equivalents and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. For the year ended December 31, 2017, restricted cash related to cash flows provided by operating activities of $2.9 million, restricted cash related to cash flows used in investing activities of $6.4 million, and restricted cash related to cash flows used in financing activities of $1.7 million were reclassified. For the year ended December 31, 2016, restricted cash related to cash flows provided by operating activities of $0.8 million, restricted cash related to cash flows used in investing activities of $1.5 million, and restricted cash related to cash flows used in financing activities of $10.4 million were reclassified. Restricted cash primarily relates to cash held in escrow for payment of real estate taxes and property reserves for maintenance, expansion or leasehold improvements as required by our mortgage loans. Restricted cash is included in "Deferred costs and other assets" in the consolidated results of operations upon adoption in 2018. We expect to adopt the standard using the modified retrospective approach, which requires a cumulative effect adjustmentbalance sheets as of the date of adoption.December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
New Standards Issued But Not Yet Adopted
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)." ASU No. 2016-02 amends the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. It is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The new leases standard requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief.
In July 2018, the FASB approved an amendment that provides an entity the optional transition method to initially account for the impact of the adoption ASU 2016-02 with a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings on January 1, 2019 (the effective date of the ASU), rather than January 1, 2017, which would eliminate the need to restate amounts presented prior to January 1, 2019. We will utilize this optional transition method. From a lessee perspective, the Company currently has sevenfour material ground leases, two material office leases, and one material garage lease that, under the new guidance, will result in the recognition of a lease liability and corresponding right-of-use asset. As of December 31, 2018, undiscounted future minimum lease payments due under these leases total approximately $31.1 million with termination dates which range from 2023 to 2076 and we expect the recognized lease liability and corresponding right-of-use asset to not exceed $20.0 millionupon adoption.
From a lessor perspective, the new guidance remains mostly similar to current rules, though contract consideration will now be allocated between lease and non-lease components. Non-lease componentscomponent allocations will be recognized under ASU 2014-09, and we expect that this will result in a different pattern of recognition for certain non-lease components, including for fixed common-area ("CAM") revenues.

However, the FASB's amendment to ASU 2016-02 referred to above allows lessors to elect, as a practical expedient, not to allocate the total consideration to lease and non-lease components based on their relative standalone selling prices. This practical expedient allows lessors to elect a combined single lease component presentation if (i) the timing and pattern of the revenue recognition of the combined single lease component is the same, and (ii) the combined single component would be classified as an operating lease. We believe we meet the criteria to use this practical expedient and we plan to elect this practical expedient upon the effective date. In addition, ASU 2016-02 limits the capitalization of leasing costs to initial direct costs, which will likely result in a reduction to our capitalized leasing costs and an increase to general and administrative expense,expenses, though the amount of such changes is highly dependent upon the leasing compensation structures in place at the time of adoption. We are currently evaluatingFor the impactyears ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company deferred $17.7 million and $16.9 million of internal leasing costs, respectively. From a lessor perspective, other than the reduction to capitalized leasing costs and increase to general and administrative expenses related to internal leasing costs based on the Company’s current leasing compensation structure, which is not expected to change significantly upon adoption of ASU 2016-02, we do not expect the adoption of this standard willASU 2016-02 to have on oura material impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In February 2015,August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, "Consolidation (Topic 810)2018-13, "Fair Value Measurements (ASC 820): AmendmentsDisclosure Framework- Changes to the Consolidation Analysis" which changed the way reporting enterprises must evaluate the consolidation of limited partnerships, variable interestsDisclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurements." ASU 2018-13 eliminates certain disclosures, modifies certain disclosures, and similar entities. Among other things, the changes eliminated the presumption in the voting model that a general partner controls a limited partnership. However, a general partner may consolidate a limited partnership under the variable interest model, depending on the facts and circumstances. It was effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, but early adoption was permitted. WPG Inc. reevaluated whether to consolidate WPG L.P., now considered a VIE, under the new guidance. Based on the facts and circumstances, WPG Inc. concluded that it may continue to consolidate WPG L.P. under the variable interest model as the primary beneficiary of the limited partnership. Ultimately, the new guidance did not impact any of our previous conclusions regarding consolidation.
In April 2015, the FASB issuedadds additional disclosures. ASU No. 2015-03, "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs." This standard amended existing guidance to require the presentation of debt issuance costs in the balance sheet as a deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability instead of as a deferred charge. It was effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, but early adoption was permitted. This new guidance reduced total assets and total long-term debt on our consolidated balance sheets by amounts ($14.6 million and $19.9 million as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively) previously classified as deferred debt issuance costs, but did not have any other effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, "Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments," which eliminates the requirement for an acquirer in a business combination to account for measurement-period adjustments retrospectively. Under this ASU, acquirers must recognize measurement-period adjustments in the period in which they determine the amounts, including the effect on earnings of any amounts they would have recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. This guidance2018-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company elected to early adopt this ASU in the third quarter of 2015, resulting in no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)." ASU No. 2016-15 is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. It is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017,2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. In addition, in November 2016, the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") of the FASB issued EITF Issue 16-A "Restricted Cash," requiring that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash would be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. This guidance is also effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods and also requires a retrospective transition approach. These new standards require a retrospective transition approach. The Company has $29.2 million and $38.9 million of restricted cash on its consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, whose cash flow statement classification will change to align with the new guidance upon adoption of these updates. We are currently evaluating the impact this ASU will have on our plans regarding the adoption date of these new standards.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, "Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business," that provides guidance to assist entities with evaluating when a set of transferred assetsfinancial statements and activities (set) is a business. The new guidance requires an acquirer to determine if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of assets; if so, the set of transferred assets and activities is not a business. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted. The new guidance will be applied on a prospective basis for transactions that occur within the period of adoption. Upon adoption of this standard, the Company anticipates that more property acquisitions will be accounted for under asset acquisition accounting rather than business combination accounting, which will result in the capitalization of transactions costs rather than expensing of said costs under the current guidance. We will early adopt this standard prospectively as of January 1, 2017, as permitted under the standard.related disclosures.
Results of Operations
The following acquisitions dispositions and developmentsdispositions affected our results in the comparative periods:
On November 16, 2018, we completed the sale of the fifth tranche of restaurant outparcels with Four Corners.
On October 31, 2018, we completed the sale of the fourth tranche of restaurant outparcels with Four Corners.
On October 23, 2018, we transitioned Rushmore Mall to the lender.
On July 27, 2018, we completed the sale of the third tranche of restaurant outparcels with Four Corners.
On June 29, 2018, we completed the sale of the second tranche of restaurant outparcels with Four Corners.
On April 24, 2018, we closed on the acquisition of Southgate Mall.
On April 11, 2018, we closed on the acquisition of four Sears department stores located at Longview Mall, Polaris Fashion Place® (unconsolidated), Southern Hills Mall, and Town Center at Aurora.
On January 12, 2018, we completed the sale of the first tranche of restaurant outparcels with Four Corners.
On November 3, 2017, we completed the sale of Colonial Park Mall.
On October 17, 2017, we completed a discounted payoff of the mortgage loan secured by Southern Hills Mall, located in Sioux City, Iowa.
On October 3, 2017, we transitioned Valle Vista Mall, located in Harlingen, Texas, to the lender.
On June 13, 2017, we sold 49% of our interest in Malibu Lumber Yard as part of the O'Connor Joint Venture II transaction.
On June 7, 2017, we completed the sale of Morgantown Commons.
On May 16, 2017, we completed the sale of an 80,000 square foot vacant anchor parcel at Indian Mound Mall, located in Heath, Ohio.
On May 12, 2017, we completed the transaction forming the O'Connor Joint Venture II with regard to the ownership and operation of six of the Company's retail properties and certain related outparcels. Under the terms of the joint venture agreement, we retained a 51% non-controlling interest and sold a 49% interest to O'Connor, the third party partner.
On April, 25, 2017, we completed a discounted payoff of the mortgage loan secured by Mesa Mall, located in Grand Junction, Colorado.
On February 21, 2017, we completed the sale of Gulf View Square and River Oaks Center.
On January 10, 2017, we completed the sale of Virginia Center Commons.
On December 29, 2016, we transitioned River Valley Mall, located in Lancaster, Ohio, to the lender.

On November 10, 2016, we soldcompleted the sale of Richmond Town Square, located in Cleveland, Ohio.Square.

On August 19, 2016, we soldcompleted the sale of Knoxville Center, located in Knoxville, Tennessee.

On June 9, 2016, we transitioned Merritt Square Mall, located in Merritt Island, Florida, to the lender.

On April 28, 2016, we transitioned Chesapeake Square, located in Chesapeake, Virginia, to the lender.

On January 29, 2016, we soldcompleted the sale of Forest Mall, located in Fond Du Lac, Wisconsin and Northlake Mall, located in Atlanta, Georgia.

On June 1, 2015, we completed the transaction forming the O'Connor Joint Venture.

On January 15, 2015, we acquired 23 properties in the Merger.

On January 13, 2015, we acquired Canyon View Marketplace, a 43,000 square foot shopping center located in Grand Junction, Colorado.

OnYear Ended December 1, 2014, we acquired our partner's 50 percent interest in Whitehall Mall, a 613,000 square foot shopping center located in Whitehall, Pennsylvania. This property was previously accounted for under the equity method, but is now consolidated as it is wholly-owned post-acquisition.


On July 17, 2014, we sold Highland Lakes Center, located in Orlando, Florida.

On June 23, 2014, we sold New Castle Plaza, located in New Castle, Indiana.

On June 20, 2014, we acquired our partner's 50 percent interest in Clay Terrace, a 577,000 square foot lifestyle center located in Carmel, Indiana. This property was previously accounted for under the equity method, but is now consolidated as it is wholly-owned post-acquisition.

On June 18, 2014, we acquired our partner's interest in a portfolio of seven open-air shopping centers, consisting of four centers located in Florida, and one each in Indiana, Connecticut and Virginia. These properties were previously accounted for under the equity method, but are now consolidated.
In addition to the above, the following dispositions of interests in joint venture properties affected our income from unconsolidated entities in the comparative periods:
On February 28, 2014, SPG disposed of its interest in one unconsolidated shopping center held within a portfolio of interests in properties, the remainder of which is included within the WPG Legacy Properties.31, 2018 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2017
For the purposes of the following comparisons, the properties acquiredtransactions listed above that occurred in the Merger transaction, includingperiods under comparison (excluding the impact of the deconsolidation of certain properties included in the O'Connor Joint Venture transactionII and the transitioning to the lendersdiscounted payoffs of River ValleyMesa Mall and Merritt SquareSouthern Hills Mall, (both causing decreases period over period),which are referred to as the "Merger Properties" and the other transactions listed abovetheir respective capitalized terms) are referred to as the "Property Transactions.Transactions," In the following discussions of our results of operations, "comparable"and "comparable properties" refers to the remaining properties we owned and operated throughout both years in the year-to-year comparisons.
Year Ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2015
Minimum rents decreased $50.3$24.2 million primarily due to a $37.6$13.8 million decrease related to the Merger Properties and $12.8O'Connor Joint Venture II properties, a $6.3 million decrease related to the Property Transactions offset byand a $0.1$4.1 million increasedecrease attributable to the comparable properties. Overage rents decreased $1.2 millionproperties, primarily attributable to the Merger Properties.a reduction in base minimum rents as a result of anchor tenant bankruptcies and related co-tenancy claims. Tenant reimbursements decreased $23.3$17.0 million primarily due to a $5.5$9.2 million decrease attributable to the comparable properties, primarily due to lower real estate tax revenue and a reduction in common-area maintenance and capital expense reimbursements as a result of tenants converting to gross deals, as well as amendments that modified certain charges in leases of national retailers that filed bankruptcy in the first half of 2018 and throughout 2017, a $5.2 million decrease related to the O'Connor Joint Venture II properties, and a $2.6 million decrease attributable to the Property Transactions and a net $18.0Transactions. Other income increased $6.2 million, decreaseprimarily attributable to the Merger Properties offset byreceipt of $4.7 million of franchise tax proceeds received, a $0.2 million increase attributable to the comparable properties. Other income decreased $3.1 million, primarily due to a $3.6 million decrease from the comparable properties primarily due to lease settlements that occurred in 2015 and a $2.3 million decrease attributable to sponsorship income at the comparable properties, partially offset by a $2.8$1.6 million increase in management, leasing and development fee income from the O'Connor Joint Venture.
Total operating expenses decreased $229.1unconsolidated joint ventures to which we provide such services, a $1.1 million of which $61.7increase from lease settlements that occurred in 2018 at the comparable properties, and a $0.4 million wasincrease in ancillary income from the comparable properties, offset by a $1.3 million decrease attributable to the Merger Properties, $20.5O'Connor Joint Venture II properties, and a $0.3 million wasdecrease attributable to the Property Transactions.
Property operating expenses increased $1.9 million, primarily due to an increase of $8.1 million attributable to the comparable properties, primarily driven by snow removal costs, property and liability insurance costs, on-site security costs, trash removal costs, utility costs, operational repairs and maintenance, and employee benefits, offset by a $3.3 million decrease attributable to the Property Transactions and $8.0a $2.9 million wasdecrease attributable to the O'Connor Joint Venture II properties. Depreciation and amortization decreased $0.9 million, primarily due to a $6.9 million decrease attributable to the O'Connor Joint Venture II properties and a $4.0 million decrease attributable to the Property Transactions, offset by a $10.0 million increase attributable to the comparable properties, primarily related to decreased depreciation on fully depreciated assets, $10.8 millionwhich was attributable to a net decrease in general and administrative expenses, $2.0 million was attributable to a net decrease in merger, restructuring and transaction costs, primarily attributable to the management transition that occurred during the year ended 2015,accelerated depreciation of certain tenant related improvements and $126.1intangibles in addition to development assets placed into service. Real estate taxes decreased $3.0 million, was attributable to a net decrease in impairment losses recorded during the year ended 2016.
Interest expense, net, decreased $3.7 million,primarily due to a $5.8$3.4 million decrease attributable to the repayment of certain mortgages in 2015 and a $5.8 million decrease attributable to the Merger Properties, which were partiallyO'Connor Joint Venture II properties, offset by a $6.8$0.2 million increase attributable to additional interest on borrowings to finance the Merger transaction (net of Bridge Loan fees written off in 2015)Property Transactions and a $1.1$0.2 million increase attributable to the comparable properties. Provision for credit losses increased $0.8 million, primarily attributable to tenant bankruptcies during 2018. General and administrative expenses increased $4.2 million, primarily attributable to $2.0 million of severance costs, as discussed in "Overview - Basis of Presentation' and $2.2 million primarily attributable to professional fees, office rent, amortization of stock-based compensation and travel costs. Ground rent decreased $1.6 million primarily attributable to the O'Connor Joint Venture II properties. The $66.9 million impairment loss recorded in 2017 related to the write down of Rushmore Mall, Colonial Park Mall and Morgantown Commons, as described in further detail under "Impairment." No impairment charges were recorded in 2018.
Interest expense, net, increased $15.4 million, of which $26.8 million was attributable to corporate debt activity primarily related to the August 2017 bond offering and amortization of deferred financing fees related to the January 2018 Facility recast and $0.1 million related to default interest on properties transitioned, or to be transitioned, to lenders. Offsetting these increases were decreases of $8.3 million attributable to the payoffs of the mortgage loans secured by Mesa Mall, WestShore Plaza, Southern Hills Mall, Henderson Square, The Outlet Collection® | Seattle, located in Auburn, Washington, and Whitehall Mall, located in Whitehall, Pennsylvania, $1.8 million attributable to the O'Connor Joint Venture II Properties, $1.0 million related to the Property Transactions, and $0.4 million attributable to the comparable properties.
Gain (loss) on disposition of interests in properties, net for 2018 is primarily attributable to the outparcel sales to Four Corners. The 2017 net gain was attributed to sales of Morgantown Commons, a vacant anchor parcel at Indian Mound Mall, the O'Connor Joint Venture II transactions, Gulf View Square, River Oaks Center, and Virginia Center Commons.
Gain on extinguishment of debt, net recognized in the 2016 period consisted of $34.6 million net gain from the transitioning of River Valley Mall, Merritt Square Mall, and Chesapeake Square to the lenders. There was no such gain in the 2015 period.
(Loss) gain on disposition of interests in properties recognized in the 20162018 period consisted of the $2.0 million loss from the sales of Richmond Town Square, Knoxville Center, Forest Mall, and Northlake Mall and in the 2015 period consisted of the $4.2$51.4 million gain related to the O'Connor Joint Venture transaction.
Preferred share dividends relate totransition of the 8.125% Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the "Series G Preferred Shares"),$94.0 million mortgage loan secured by Rushmore Mall. The gain on extinguishment of debt, net recognized in the 7.5% Series H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the "Series H Preferred Shares"), and2017 period consisted of the 6.875% Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the "Series I Preferred Shares") issued in conjunction with the Merger. Preferred dividends decreased $2.0$90.6 million primarilygain related to the Series G Preferred Shares,discounted payoff of the $99.7 million mortgage loan secured by Southern Hills Mall, transitioning of the $40.0 million mortgage loan secured by Valle Vista Mall to the lender, and the discounted payoff of the $87.3 million mortgage loan secured by Mesa Mall.

Income and other taxes decreased $1.9 million, which were redeemedwas primarily attributable to a nonrecurring state use tax that was incurred in full on April 15, 2015.

2017.
For WPG Inc., net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests primarily relates to the allocation of income (loss) to third parties based on their respective weighted average ownership interest in WPG L.P., which percentage remained consistent over the periods.
Year Ended December 31, 20152017 vs. Year Ended December 31, 20142016
For purposes of the following comparisons, the transactions listed above that occurred in the periods under comparison (excluding the properties included in the O'Connor Joint Venture II and the discounted payoffs of Mesa Mall and Southern Hills Mall, which are referred to as their respective capitalized terms) are referred to as the "Property Transactions," and "comparable properties" refers to the remaining properties we owned and operated throughout both years in the year-to-year comparisons.
Minimum rents increased $179.5decreased $56.4 million, of which the Merger Properties accounted for $163.5primarily due to a $33.3 million anddecrease related to the Property Transactions accounted for $19.2 million. Comparable rents decreased $3.2and $23.6 million or 0.7%, primarily attributabledecrease related to the O'Connor Joint Venture II properties offset by a slight decrease in base minimum rents. Overage rents increased $4.7$0.5 million primarilyincrease attributable to the Merger Properties.comparable properties. Overage rents decreased $3.8 million primarily due to a $1.0 million decrease related to the Property Transactions, $1.3 million decrease related to the O'Connor Joint Venture II properties, and a $1.5 million decrease attributable to the comparable properties. Tenant reimbursements increased $64.9decreased $28.2 million due to $62.3a $12.1 million attributable to the Merger Properties and $5.7 milliondecrease attributable to the Property Transactions, partially offset by a $3.1$8.0 million decrease fromrelated to the O'Connor Joint Venture II properties, and an $8.1 million decrease attributable to the comparable properties.properties, primarily due to rent restructuring in leases for national retailers that filed bankruptcy in 2017 and 2016. Other income increased $11.3$3.0 million, primarily due to $5.0a $2.2 million attributable to the Merger Properties, $3.6increase from lease settlements that occurred in 2017 and a $1.2 million ofincrease in management, leasing and development fee income from the unconsolidated joint ventures to which we provide such services, offset by a net $0.4 million decrease attributable to ancillary property income.
Property operating expenses decreased $20.2 million, of which $14.1 million was attributable to the Property Transactions, $3.9 million was attributable to the O'Connor Joint Venture $0.1II properties, and $2.2 million was attributable to the comparable properties, primarily involving a reduction in management fee expense related to the termination of certain transition service agreements with SPG in connection with the 2014 spin-off. Depreciation and amortization decreased $22.4 million, primarily due to a $17.1 million decrease attributable to the Property Transactions and an $11.5 million decrease attributable to the O'Connor Joint Venture II properties, offset by a $6.2 million increase attributable to the comparable properties, which was primarily due to development assets placed into service. Real estate taxes decreased $13.0 million, primarily due to an $8.7 million decrease attributable to the Property Transactions and a net $2.6$5.0 million decrease attributable to the O'Connor Joint Venture II properties, offset by a $0.7 million increase fromattributable to the comparable propertiesproperties. Provision for credit losses increased $0.6 million, primarily attributable to lease settlements.
Total operating expenses increased $403.8 million, of which $35.7 million was attributable to generaltenant bankruptcies during 2017. General and administrative expenses associated with WPG Inc. operating as a separate, publicly-traded company, $22.8decreased $2.4 million, was attributableprimarily due to reductions in external legal, consulting, and audit fees and reductions in salaries and wages expenses. The decrease in merger, restructuring and transaction costs associated with the Merger and $148.0 million related to impairment losses recorded in the 2015 period. Of the remaining $197.3 million increase, $218.7of $29.6 million was attributable to the Merger Propertiesmanagement transition as well as strategic alternatives explored during 2016 and $18.1no comparable costs occurring in 2017. The increase of $45.0 million in impairment losses recorded in 2017 relate to the write down of Rushmore Mall, Colonial Park Mall and Morgantown Commons, as described in further detail under "Impairment," when compared to the impairments taken during the comparable period in 2016.
Interest expense, net, decreased $9.7 million, of which $7.5 million was attributable to the Property Transactions. These amounts are partially offset by the $38.9 million of spin-off costs incurred during the 2014 period related to our separation from SPG and a net $0.6 million decrease attributable to the comparable properties.
Interest expense increased $57.5 million, of which $28.2 million was attributable to net borrowings to finance the Merger transaction and $27.1Transactions, $11.0 million was attributable to the additional property mortgages assumed indiscounted payoffs of the Merger. Of the remaining $2.2 million increase, $4.2 million was attributable to mortgages placed on seven previously unencumbered properties during 2014, $7.1 million was attributable to borrowings on the Facility, $0.7 million was attributable to borrowings on the December 2015 Term Loan (defined below)mortgage loans secured by Mesa Mall and $0.1Southern Hills Mall, respectively, and $3.3 million was attributable to the Property Transactions. TheseO'Connor Joint Venture II properties. Offsetting these decreases were increases were partiallyof $11.4 million related to corporate debt activity, primarily related to the August 2017 bond offering offset by an $8.5reduced Revolver activity, reductions in term loan interest expense, and swap ineffectiveness, and $0.7 million decrease attributablerelated to the repayment and refinancing of certain mortgages in 2014 and 2015 and a $1.4 million decrease primarily attributable to lower interestother financing activities.
Gain (loss) on the amortizing loan balances of the comparable properties.
The $4.2 million gain upon acquisition of controlling interests and on saledisposition of interests in properties, recognizednet in the 20152017 period relates toconsisted of a net gain of $124.8 million from the sales of Colonial Park Mall, Morgantown Commons, a vacant anchor parcel at Indian Mound Mall, the O'Connor Joint Venture transaction.II transaction, Gulf View Square, River Oaks Center, and Virginia Center Commons. The aggregate gain$2.0 million loss in the 2016 period occurred from the sales of Richmond Town Square, Knoxville Center, Forest Mall, and Northlake Mall.
Gain on extinguishment of debt recognized in the 20142017 period consisted of $111.0$90.6 million consistsgain related to the discounted payoff of $99.4the $99.7 million mortgage loan secured by Southern Hills Mall, transitioning of $40.0 million mortgage loan secured by Valle Vista Mall to the lender, and the discounted payoff of the $87.3 million mortgage loan secured by Mesa Mall. The gain on extinguishment of debt, net recognized in the 2016 period consisted of the $34.6 million net gain from the acquisitiontransitioning of controlling interestsRiver Valley Mall, Merritt Square Mall, and Chesapeake Square to the lenders.
Income and other taxes increased $1.2 million, which was attributable primarily to a nonrecurring state use tax that was incurred in Clay Terrace, a portfolio of seven open-air shopping centers and Whitehall Mall, $9.0 million from the sale of Highland Lakes Center, $2.4 million from the sale of New Castle Plaza and $0.2 million from the sale of our interest in one unconsolidated shopping center.2017.
For WPG Inc., net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interests primarily relates to the allocation of (loss) income to third parties based on their respective weighted average ownership interest in WPG L.P., which percentage decreased slightly due toremained consistent over the capital transactions related to the Merger.periods.
Preferred share dividends relate to the Series G Preferred Shares, the Series H Preferred Shares and the Series I Preferred Shares issued in connection with the Merger. Preferred dividends totaling $16.0 million increased net loss to common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2015. The unpaid portion of these preferred dividends is included in distributions payable in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015. See “Equity Activity - Distributions” below. The Series G Preferred Shares were redeemed in full on April 15, 2015.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary uses of cash include payment of operating expenses, working capital, debt repayment, including principal and interest, reinvestment in properties, development and redevelopment of properties, tenant allowance and share/unit dividends. Our primary sources of cash are operating cash flow and borrowings under our debt arrangements, including our senior unsecured revolving credit facility, or "Revolver,""Revolver", unsecured notes payable and three senior unsecured term loans as further discussed below.
Because we own primarily long-lived income-producing assets, our financing strategy relies on long-term fixed rate mortgage debt as well as floating rate debt (including unsecured financing such as the Revolver and our term loans). At December 31, 2016, floating rate debt (excluding loans hedged to fixed interest) comprised 24.3% of our total consolidated debt. We will continue to monitor our borrowing mix to limit market risk. We derive most of our liquidity from leases that generate positive net cash flow from operations, the total of which was $289.8$287.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2016.2018.
Our balance of cash and cash equivalents decreased $56.9$9.5 million during 20162018 to $59.4$42.5 million as of December 31, 2016.2018. The decrease was primarily due to the net repayment of debt, dividend distributions, and capital expenditures, partially offset by operating cash flow from properties, net distributions from our joint ventures, and the net proceeds from the disposition of properties. See "Cash Flows" below for more information.

Because we own primarily long-lived income-producing assets, our financing strategy relies on a combination of long-term mortgage debt as well as unsecured debt supported by a quality unencumbered asset pool, providing us with ample flexibility from a liquidity perspective. Our strategy is to have the majority of our debt fixed either through fixed rate mortgages or interest rate swaps that effectively fix the interest rate. At December 31, 2018, floating rate debt (excluding loans hedged to fixed interest) comprised 15.2% of our total consolidated debt. We will continue to monitor our borrowing mix to limit market risk.
During the third quarter of 2017, we successfully completed the issuance of $750.0 million of unsecured notes. The notes are due on August 15, 2024 and the proceeds were used to repay the $500.0 million Term Loan (as defined in "Financing and Debt"), with a maturity date of May 30, 2018 and $230.0 million of the June 2015 Term Loan (as defined in "Financing and Debt") with a maturity date of March 2, 2020, respectively.
Additionally, on January 22, 2018, we amended and restated our Facility (as defined under "The Facility."). Under the amended and restated terms, the Facility will mature in December 2022 assuming all extension options are exercised. Prior to the amendment and restatement, the Revolver matured on May 30, 2019, assuming all extension options were exercised. These transactions are reflective of our strategy to access the unsecured debt markets to extend our weighted average debt maturity.
On December 31, 2016,2018, we had an aggregate available borrowing capacity of $591.7$359.8 million under the Revolver, net of outstanding borrowings of $308.0$290.0 million and $0.3$0.2 million reserved for outstanding letters of credit. The weighted average interest rate on the Revolver was 1.8%3.3% for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018.
Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Fitch Ratings & Moody's Investor Service lowered their credit rating on WPG L.P.'s unsecured long-term indebtedness, which will increase interest rates on our Facility (as defined in "Overview - Basis of Presentation - The Facility."), December 2015 Term Loan, and 5.950% Notes due 2024 as of February 2, 2019. Due to the downgrade, our Revolver will bear interest at LIBOR plus 165 basis points (an increase of 40 basis points), our Term Loan will bear interest at LIBOR plus 190 basis points (an increase of 45 basis points), and our December 2015 Term Loan will bear interest at LIBOR plus 235 basis points (an increase of 55 basis points). Our 5.950% Notes due 2024 will bear interest at 6.450% (an increase of 50 basis points). Assuming the new pricing grid was effective January 1, 2018, the impact would have resulted in an increase in borrowing costs of approximately $8.5 million during 2018. Such a downgrade may also impact terms and conditions of future borrowings in addition to adversely affecting our ability to access the public markets.
The consolidated indebtedness of our business was approximately $3.5$2.9 billion as of December 31, 2016,2018, or a decreasean increase of approximately $142.2$39.9 million from December 31, 2015.2017. The change in consolidated indebtedness from December 31, 20152017 is described in greater detail under "Financing and Debt."
Outlook
Our business model and WPG Inc.'s status as a REIT requires us to regularly access the debt markets to raise funds for acquisition, development and redevelopment activity, and to refinance maturing debt. We may also, from time to time, access the equity capital markets to accomplish our business objectives. We believe we have sufficient cash on hand, availability under the Revolver and cash flow from operations to address our debt maturities, distributions and capital needs through 2017.2019.
The successful execution of our business strategy will require the availability of substantial amounts of operating and development capital both currently and over time. Sources of such capital could include additional bank borrowings, public and private offerings of debt or equity, including rights offerings, sale of certain assets and joint ventures. The major credit rating agencies have assigned us investment grade credit ratings as of December 31, 2018, but there can be no assurance that the Company will achieve a particular rating or maintain a particular rating in the future.future (see discussion above for further details).

Cash Flows
Our net cash flow from operating activities totaled $289.8$287.2 million during 2016.2018. During 2016,2018, we also:
funded capital expenditures of $173.6 million,
funded net amounts of restricted cash reserves held for future capital expenditures of $2.0$153.9 million,
received net proceeds from the disposition of interests in properties and outparcels of $22.7$39.2 million,
funded investments in unconsolidated entities of $11.6$20.2 million,
received distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities of $38.6$35.1 million,
funded a net amount of lender-required restricted cash reserves on mortgage loans of $3.0 million,
received net proceeds from our debt financing, refinancing, and repayment activities of $17.2$120.4 million; and
funded distributions to common and preferred shareholders and unitholders of $235.1$236.8 million.
In general, we anticipate that cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet operating expenses, monthly debt service, recurring capital expenditures, and distributions to shareholders necessary to maintain WPG Inc.'s status as a REIT on a long-term basis. In addition, we expect to be able to generate or obtain capital for nonrecurring capital expenditures, such as acquisitions, major building renovations and expansions, as well as for scheduled principal maturities on outstanding indebtedness, from:
excess cash generated from operating performance and working capital reserves,
borrowings on our debt arrangements,
opportunistic asset sales,
additional secured or unsecured debt financing, or
additional equity raised in the public or private markets.
We expect to generate positive cash flow from operations in 2017,2019, and we consider these projected cash flows in our sources and uses of cash. These cash flows are principally derived from rents paid by our retail tenants. A significant deterioration in projected cash flows from operations could cause us to increase our reliance on available funds from our debt arrangements, curtail planned capital expenditures, or seek other additional sources of financing as discussed above.


Financing and Debt
Mortgage Debt
Total mortgage indebtedness at December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 was as follows (in thousands):
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 December 31,
2018
 December 31,
2017
Face amount of mortgage loans $1,610,429
 $1,782,103
 $980,276
 $1,152,436
Fair value adjustments, net 12,661
 17,683
 5,764
 8,338
Debt issuance cost, net (5,010) (6,347) (2,771) (3,692)
Carrying value of mortgage loans $1,618,080
 $1,793,439
 $983,269
 $1,157,082
A roll forward of mortgage indebtedness from December 31, 20152017 to December 31, 20162018 is summarized as follows (in thousands):
Balance at December 31, 2015 $1,793,439
Debt amortization payments (16,526)
Debt borrowings, net 4,530
Debt cancelled upon lender foreclosures, net of debt issuance costs of $0.3 million (159,828)
Amortization of fair value and other adjustments (5,022)
Amortization of debt issuance costs 1,487
Balance at December 31, 2016 $1,618,080
Balance at December 31, 2017 $1,157,082
Debt amortization payments (18,322)
Repayment of debt (94,838)
Debt borrowings, net of issuance costs 34,782
Debt canceled upon lender foreclosures, net of debt issuance costs (93,988)
Amortization of fair value and other adjustments (2,574)
Amortization of debt issuance costs 1,127
Balance at December 31, 2018 $983,269
On October 1, 2016,23, 2018, the $94.0 million mortgage on Rushmore Mall was canceled upon a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure agreement (see "Covenants" section below for additional details).

On October 2, 2018, an affiliate of WPG Inc. repaid the $8.3 million mortgage loan on Whitehall Mall, located in Whitehall, Pennsylvania. This repayment was funded by cash on hand.
On September 27, 2018, an affiliate of WPG Inc. closed on a $35.0 million full-recourse note payable secured by Southgate Mall (see details under "Overview - Basis of Presentation - Southgate").
On June 8, 2018, the Company exercised the secondfirst of twothree options to extend the maturity date of the principal amount of the mortgage$65.0 million term loan on WestShore Plaza,secured by Weberstown Mall, located in Tampa, Florida,Stockton, California, for one year. The extended maturity date is October 1, 2017.
On June 8, 2016, the Company borrowed $65.0 million under a term loan secured by ownership interests in Weberstown Mall, located in Stockton, California (the "June 2016 Secured Loan"). The June 2016 Secured Loan bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 1.75% and will initially mature on June 8, 2018,2019, subject to three one-yeartwo one year extensions available at our option subject to compliance with the terms of the underlying loan agreement and payment of customary extension fees.
On January 19, 2018, an affiliate of WPG Inc. repaid the $86.5 million mortgage loan on The interest rateOutlet Collection® | Seattle. This repayment was funded by borrowings on the June 2016 Secured Loan may vary inRevolver (as defined below).
On December 29, 2017, an affiliate of WPG Inc. repaid the future based on the Company's credit rating. The Company used the proceeds from the June 2016 Secured Loan to repay the $60.0$11.7 million mortgage loan secured by WeberstownHenderson Square, located in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. This repayment was funded by cash on hand.
On October 17, 2017, an affiliate of WPG Inc. completed a discounted payoff of the $99.7 million mortgage loan secured by Southern Hills Mall for $55.0 million (see "Covenants" section below for additional details).
On October 3, 2017, the $40.0 million mortgage on Valle Vista Mall was canceled upon a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure agreement (see "Covenants" section below for additional details).
On October 2, 2017, an affiliate of WPG Inc. repaid the $99.6 million mortgage loan on WestShore Plaza, located in Tampa, Florida. This repayment was funded by borrowings on the Revolver.
On May 10, 2017 and prior to the deconsolidation of these properties due to the sale of 49% of our interests (see section "The O'Connor Joint Ventures" for other general corporate purposes. Asadditional details), the Company closed on non-recourse mortgage loans encumbering The Arboretum, Gateway Centers, and Oklahoma City Properties. The following table summarizes the key terms of each mortgage loan:
Property Principal Debt issuance costs Net debt issuance Interest Rate Maturity Date
The Arboretum $59,400
 $(452) $58,948
 4.13% June 1, 2027
Gateway Centers 112,500
 (709) 111,791
 4.03% June 1, 2027
Oklahoma City Properties 43,279
 (427) 42,852
 3.90% June 1, 2027
Total $215,179
 $(1,588) $213,591
    
The Arboretum and Gateway Centers loans require monthly interest only payments until July 1, 2021, at which time monthly interest and principal payments are due until maturity. The Oklahoma City Properties loan requires monthly interest only payments until July 1, 2022, at which time monthly interest and principal payments are due until maturity. We used the net proceeds to repay a portion of the outstanding balance on the Revolver, as defined below. These three loans were deconsolidated during the year ended December 31, 2016,2017, in connection with the balance was $64.6completion of the O'Connor Joint Venture II transaction.
On April 25, 2017, the Company completed a discounted payoff of the $87.3 million net of $0.4 million of debt issuance costs, and the applicable interest rate was 2.5%.
The aggregate principal amount of mortgage loansloan secured by Chesapeake Square, Merritt SquareMesa Mall and River Valley Mall were extinguished upon the properties transitioning to the lenders on April 28, 2016, June 9, 2016, and December 29, 2016, respectivelyfor $63.0 million (see "Covenants" section below for further discussion)additional details).
Highly-levered Assets
WeAs of December 31, 2018, we have identified threetwo mortgage loans that have leverage levels in excess of our targeted leverage and have worked with, or have plans to work with the special servicers on these non-recourse mortgages. We received notices of default for theThese mortgage notes relating to Mesa Mall in Grand Junction, Colorado, and Southern Hills Mall in Sioux City, Iowa. See "Covenants" below for further discussion on these notices of default. We have also identified Valle Vista Mall in Harlingen, Texas as over-levered and expect to commence discussions with the special servicer on this loan as well. As of December 31, 2016, the mortgages on the highly-levered properties totaled $228.8loans total $95.1 million and weencumber Towne West Square and West Ridge Mall and West Ridge Plaza, all of which have been identified as noncore properties. We expect to improve our leverage once all, or a portion of them, are transitioned to the lenders, with minimal impact to net cash flows. See "Covenants" below for further discussion on these highly-levered assets.

Unsecured Debt
The Facilityfollowing table identifies our total unsecured debt outstanding at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017:
On May
  December 31,
2018
 December 31,
2017
Notes payable:    
Face amount - the Exchange Notes(1)
 $250,000
 $250,000
Face amount - 5.950% Notes due 2024(2)
 750,000
 750,000
Debt discount, net (9,680) (11,086)
Debt issuance costs, net (7,623) (9,542)
Total carrying value of notes payable $982,697
 $979,372
     
Unsecured term loans:(8)
    
Face amount - Term Loan(3)(4)
 $350,000
 $
Face amount - December 2015 Term Loan(5)
 340,000
 340,000
Face amount - June 2015 Term Loan(6)
 
 270,000
Debt issuance costs, net (4,491) (3,305)
Total carrying value of unsecured term loans $685,509
 $606,695
     
Revolving credit facility:(3)(7)
    
Face amount $290,000
 $155,000
Debt issuance costs, net (3,998) (540)
Total carrying value of revolving credit facility $286,002
 $154,460
(1)The Exchange Notes were issued at a 0.028% discount, bear interest at 3.850% per annum and mature on April 1, 2020.
(2) The 5.950% Notes due 2024 were issued at a 1.533% discount, bear interest at 5.950% per annum, and mature on August 15, 2014, we closed on2024. The interest rate could vary in the future based upon changes to the Company's credit ratings. In February 2019, the Company's credit rating was downgraded which will result in an interest rate increase of 50 basis points to 6.450%.
(3)The Revolver and a senior unsecured term loan, or "Term Loan" (collectively referred toTerm Loan are collectively known as the "Facility").Facility, as defined in "Overview - Basis of Presentation - The Revolver provides borrowings on a revolving basis up to $900 million, bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 1.25%, and will initially mature on May 30, 2018, subject to two, six-month extensions available at our option subject to compliance with the terms of the Facility and payment of a customary extension fee. Facility."
(4)The Term Loan provides borrowings in an aggregate principal amount up to $500 million, bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 1.45%, per annum and will initially mature on MayDecember 30, 2017, subject to two, 12-month extensions available at our option subject to compliance with the terms of the Facility and payment of a customary extension fee. Our intent is to exercise the first extension. On July 6, 2016, the Company executed2022. We had interest rate swap agreements totaling $200.0$270.0 million, which effectively fixed the interest rate on a portion of the Term Loan at 2.04%2.56% per annum through August 1,June 30, 2018. TheOn May 9, 2018, we executed swap agreements totaling $250.0 million to replace matured swap agreements, which effectively fix the interest rate on a portion of the Facility may vary in the future based on the Company's credit rating.
Term Loan at 4.21% through June 30, 2021. At December 31, 2016, borrowings under the Facility consisted of $308.0 million outstanding under the Revolver (before debt issuance costs, net of $1.8 million) and $500.0 million outstanding under the Term Loan. On December 31, 2016, we had an aggregate available borrowing capacity of $591.7 million under the Facility, net of $0.3 million reserved for outstanding letters of credit. At December 31, 2016, the applicable interest rate on the Revolver was one-month LIBOR plus 1.25%, or 2.02%, and2018, the applicable interest rate on the unhedged portion of the Term Loan was one-month LIBOR plus 1.45%, or 2.22%3.95%. In February 2019, the Company's credit rating was downgraded which will result in an interest rate increase of45 basis points to LIBOR plus 1.90%.
Term Loans
On December 10, 2015, the Company borrowed $340.0 million under an additional new term loan (the "December 2015 Term Loan"), pursuant to a commitment received from bank lenders. (5)The December 2015 Term Loan bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 1.80% per annum and will mature inon January 10, 2023. On December 11, 2015, the Company executedWe have interest rate swap agreements totaling $340.0 million, which effectively fixedfix the interest rate on the December 2015 Term Loan at 3.51% per annum through January 2023. The interest rate on the December 2015 Term Loan may vary in the future based onmaturity. In February 2019, the Company's credit rating. The Company used the proceeds from the December 2015 Term Loanrating was downgraded which will result in an interest rate increase of55 basis points to repay outstanding amounts on the Revolver and for other general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2016, the balance was $336.9 million, net of $3.1 million of debt issuance costs.LIBOR plus 2.35%.
On June 4, 2015, the Company borrowed $500.0 million under a new term loan (the "June 2015 Term Loan"), pursuant to a commitment received from bank lenders. (6)The June 2015 Term Loan bearsbore interest at one-month LIBOR plus 1.45% and will mature in March 2020. On June 19, 2015,per annum. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company executed interest rate swap agreements totaling $500.0repaid $230.0 million with an effective date of July 6, 2015, which effectively fixed the interest rate on the June 2015 Term Loan and wrote off $0.9 million of debt issuance costs. On January 22, 2018, the Company repaid the remaining $270.0 million outstanding with proceeds from the amended and restated Facility (as discussed above) and wrote off $0.5 million of debt issuance costs.
(7)As of December 31, 2017, the Revolver provided borrowings on a revolving basis up to $900.0 million, bore interest at 2.56% through Juneone-month LIBOR plus 1.25%, and was initially scheduled to mature on May 30, 2018. TheOn January 22, 2018, we amended the terms of the Revolver to provide borrowings on a revolving basis up to $650.0 million at one-month LIBOR plus 1.25%. Under the amended terms, the Revolver will mature on December 30, 2021, subject to two six months month extensions available at our option subject to compliance with terms of the Facility and payment of a customary extension fee. Upon the amended terms, the Company wrote off $0.3 million of debt issuance costs. At December 31, 2018, we had an aggregate available borrowing capacity of $359.8 million under the Revolver, net of $0.2 million reserved for outstanding letters of credit. At December 31, 2018, the applicable interest rate on the June 2015 Term Loan mayRevolver was one-month LIBOR plus 1.25%, or 3.75%. In February 2019, the Company's credit rating was downgraded which will result in an interest rate increase of40 basis points to LIBOR plus 1.65%.
(8)While we have interest rate swap agreements in place that fix the LIBOR portion of the rates as noted above, the spread over LIBOR could vary in the future based onupon changes to the Company's credit rating. The Company used the proceeds from the June 2015 Term Loan to repay the remaining outstanding balance on the Bridge Loan (defined below). As of December 31, 2016, the balance was $497.6 million, net of $2.4 million of debt issuance costs.
Bridge Loan
On September 16, 2014, in connection with the execution of the Merger Agreement, WPG entered into a debt commitment letter, which was amended and restated on September 23, 2014 pursuant to which parties agreed to provide up to $1.25 billion in a senior unsecured bridge loan facility (the “Bridge Loan”). The Bridge Loan had a maturity date of January 14, 2016, the date that was 364 days following the closing date of the Merger.
On January 15, 2015, the Company borrowed $1.19 billion under the Bridge Loan in connection with the closing of the Merger, which balance was repaid in full during 2015.
The Company incurred $10.4 million of Bridge Loan commitment, structuring and funding fees. Upon full repayment of the Bridge Loan, the Company accelerated amortization of the deferred loan costs, resulting in total amortization of $10.4 million included in interest expense in the consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Notes Payable
On March 24, 2015, WPG L.P. closed on a private placement of $250.0 million of 3.850% senior unsecured notes (the "Notes Payable") at a 0.028% discount due April 1, 2020. WPG L.P. received net proceeds from the offering of $248.4 million, which it used to repay a portion of outstanding borrowings under the Bridge Loan. The Notes Payable contain certain customary covenants and events of default which, if any such event of default occurs, would permit or require the principal, premium, if any, and accrued and unpaid interest on all of the then-outstanding Notes Payable to be declared immediately due and payable (subject in certain cases to customary grace and cure periods).ratings.

On October 21, 2015, WPG L.P. completed an offer to exchange (the "Exchange Offer") up to $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes Payable for a like principal amount of its 3.850% senior unsecured notes that have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Exchange Notes").  On October 21, 2015, $250.0 million of Exchange Notes were issued in exchange for $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes Payable that were tendered in the Exchange Offer.
As of December 31, 2016, the balance outstanding under the Exchange Notes was $247.6 million, net of $2.4 million of debt discount and issuance costs.
Covenants
Our unsecured debt agreements contain financial and other covenants. If we were to fail to comply with these covenants, after the expiration of the applicable cure periods, the debt maturity could be accelerated or other remedies could be sought by one or more of the respective lenders including adjustments to the applicable interest rate. As of December 31, 2016,2018, management believes the Company is in compliance with all covenants of its unsecured debt.
The total balance of mortgages was approximately $1.6 billion$980.3 million as of December 31, 2016.2018. At December 31, 2016,2018, certain of our consolidated subsidiaries were the borrowers under 3021 non-recourse loans oneand two full-recourse loan and one partial-recourse loanloans secured by mortgages encumbering 3626 properties, including twoone separate poolspool of cross-defaulted and cross-collateralized mortgages encumbering a total of sixfour properties. Under these cross-default provisions, a default under any mortgage included in the cross-defaulted pool may constitute a default under all mortgages within that pool and may lead to acceleration of the indebtedness due on each property within the pool. Certain of our secured debt instruments contain financial and other non-financial covenants which are specific to the properties which serve as collateral for that debt. Our existing non-recourse mortgage loans generally prohibit our subsidiaries that are borrowers thereunder from incurring additional indebtedness, subject to certain customary and limited exceptions. In addition, certain of these instruments limit the ability of the applicable borrower's parent entity from incurring mezzanine indebtedness unless certain conditions are satisfied, including compliance with maximum loan to value ratio and minimum debt service coverage ratio tests. Further, under certain of these existing agreements, if certain cash flow levels in respect of the applicable mortgaged property (as described in the applicable agreement) are not maintained for at least two consecutive quarters, the lender could accelerate the debt and enforce its right against its collateral. If the borrower fails to comply with these covenants, the lenders could accelerate the debt and enforce its right against their collateral.
On November 19, 2018, we received a notice of default letter, dated November 15, 2018, from the special servicer to the borrower, a consolidated subsidiary of WPG L.P., concerning the $49.9 million mortgage loan secured by West Ridge Mall and West Ridge Plaza, located in Topeka, Kansas (collectively known as "West Ridge"). The notice was issued by the special servicer because the borrower did not make certain reserve payments or deposits as required by the loan agreement for the aforementioned loan. The borrower has initiated discussions with the special servicer regarding this non-recourse loan and is considering various options. The Company will continue to manage and lease the property.
On May 29, 2018, we received a notice of default letter, dated May 25, 2018, from the special servicer to the borrower, a consolidated subsidiary of WPG L.P., concerning the $94.0 million mortgage loan secured by Rushmore Mall ("Rushmore"). The notice was issued by the special servicer because the borrower notified the lender that there were insufficient funds to ensure future compliance with the mortgage loan due to the loss of certain tenants at Rushmore. On October 23, 2018, an affiliate of the Company transitioned the property to the lender.
On April 11, 2018, we received a notice of default letter, dated April 6, 2018, from the special servicer to the borrower, a consolidated subsidiary of WPG L.P., concerning the $45.2 million mortgage loan secured by Towne West Square, located in Wichita, Kansas. The notice was issued by the special servicer because the borrower did not make certain reserve payments or deposits as required by the loan agreement for the aforementioned loan. On August 24, 2018, we received notification that a receiver had been appointed to manage and lease the property. An affiliate of the Company still holds title to the property.
On March 30, 2017, the Company transferred the then $40.0 million mortgage loan secured by Valle Vista Mall to the special servicer at the request of the borrower, a consolidated subsidiary of the Company. On May 18, 2017, we received a notice of default letter, dated that same date, from the special servicer because the borrower did not repay the loan in full by its May 10, 2017 maturity date. On October 3, 2017, an affiliate of WPG Inc. transitioned the property to the lender.
On June 6, 2016, we received a notice of default letter, dated June 3, 2016, from the special servicer to the borrower of the then $99.7 million mortgage loan secured by Southern Hills Mall.  The letter was sent because the borrower, a consolidated subsidiary of the Company, did not repay the loan in full by its June 1, 2016 maturity date.  On October 27, 2016, we received notification that a receiver had been appointed to manage and lease the property. On October 17, 2017, an affiliate of WPG Inc. completed a discounted payoff of the mortgage loan for $55.0 million and we retained ownership and management of the property.
On June 30, 2016, we received a notice, dated that same date, that the then $87.3 million mortgage loan secured by Mesa Mall had been transferred to the special servicer due to the payment default that occurred when the borrower, a consolidated subsidiary of the Company, did not repay the loan in full by its June 1, 2016 maturity date. The borrower has initiated discussions with the special servicer regarding this non-recourse loan and is considering various options including restructuring, extending and other options, including transitioning the property to the lender.
On June 6, 2016, we received a notice of default letter, dated June 3, 2016, from the special servicer to the borrower of the $101.5 million mortgage loan secured by Southern Hills Mall.  The letter was sent because the borrower, a consolidated subsidiary ofApril 25, 2017, the Company did not repay the loan in full by its June 1, 2016 maturity date.  On October 27, 2016, we received notification thatcompleted a receiver has been appointed to manage and lease the property.
On August 8, 2016, we received a notice of default letter, dated August 4, 2016, from the special servicer to the borrower concerning the $44.9 million mortgage loan secured by River Valley Mall. The letter was sent because the borrower, a consolidated subsidiary of the Company, did not repay the loan in full by its January 11, 2016 maturity date. On December 29, 2016, we transferred title of the property to the mortgage lender pursuant to the terms of a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure agreement entered into by the Company's affiliate and the mortgage lender.
On October 8, 2015, we received a notice of default letter, dated October 5, 2015, from the special servicer to the borrower of the $52.9 million mortgage loan secured by Merritt Square Mall.  The letter was sent because the borrower, a consolidated subsidiary of the Company, did not repay the loan in full by its September 1, 2015 maturity date. On May 25, 2016, the trustee on behalfdiscounted payoff of the mortgage lender conducted a non-judicial foreclosure sale of Merritt Square Mall, in which the Company's affiliate previously held a 100%loan for $63.0 million and retained ownership interest. The mortgage lender was the successful bidder at the sale and ownership transferred on June 9, 2016. The Company managed the property through and including July 31, 2016.
On October 30, 2015, we received a notice of default letter, dated that same date, from the special servicer to the borrower concerning the $62.4 million mortgage loan that matures on February 1, 2017 and was secured by Chesapeake Square.  The default resulted from an operating cash flow shortfall at the property in October 2015 that the borrower, a consolidated subsidiarymanagement of the Company, did not cure. On April 21, 2016, the trustee on behalf of the mortgage lender conducted a non-judicial foreclosure of Chesapeake Square, in which the Company's affiliate previously held majority ownership interest. The mortgage lender was the successful bidder at the sale and ownership transferred on April 28, 2016.property.

UponDuring the ownership transfers of River Valley Mall, Merritt Square Mall, and Chesapeake Square,year ended December 31, 2018 the Company recognized a net gain of $34.6$51.4 million based onrelated to the cancellation of outstanding$94.0 million mortgage debt cancellation and ownership transfer of $160.1 million,Rushmore Mall, which is included in gain on extinguishment of debt, net in the consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the year then ended. During the year ended December 31, 2016.2017, the Company recognized a net gain of $90.6 million based on the cancellation of mortgage debt of $108.9 million related to discounted payoff of the mortgage note payable secured by Southern Hills Mall, ownership transfer of Valle Vista Mall, and discounted payoff of the mortgage note payable secured by Mesa Mall, which is included in gain on extinguishment of debt, net in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the year then ended.
At December 31, 2016,2018, management believes the applicable borrowers under our other non-recourse mortgage loans were in compliance with all covenants where non-compliance could individually, or giving effect to applicable cross-default provisions in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. As mentioned earlier, in addition to the properties mentioned above, we have identified Valle Vista Mall as over-levered. We expect to commence discussions with the special servicer on the loan encumbering this property prior to loan maturity. The Company has assessed each of thesethe defaulted properties for impairment indicators and hashave concluded no impairment charges arewere warranted as of December 31, 2016.2018.
Summary of Financing
Our consolidated debt and the effective weighted average interest rates as of December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
 December 31, 2016 
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
 December 31, 2015 
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
 December 31, 2018 
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
 December 31, 2017 
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
Fixed-rate debt, face amount $2,649,329
 4.23% $2,686,003
 4.48% $2,505,276
 4.91% $2,610,936
 4.72%
Variable-rate debt, face amount 859,100
 2.25% 964,850
 1.91% 455,000
 3.87% 306,500
 2.99%
Total face amount of debt 3,508,429
 3.75% 3,650,853
 3.80% 2,960,276
 4.75% 2,917,436
 4.54%
Note discount (47)   (60)   (9,680)   (11,086)  
Fair value adjustments, net 12,661
   17,683
   5,764
   8,338
  
Debt issuance costs, net (14,639)   (19,875)   (18,883)   (17,079)  
Total carrying value of debt $3,506,404
   $3,648,601
   $2,937,477
   $2,897,609
  

Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes the material aspects of the Company's future obligations for consolidated entities as of December 31, 2016,2018, assuming the obligations remain outstanding through maturities noted below (in thousands):
  2017 2018 - 2019 2020 - 2021 Thereafter Total
Long-term debt (1) $346,050
 $1,007,341
 $1,120,064
 $1,034,974
 $3,508,429
Interest payments (2) 112,783
 202,925
 104,651
 58,368
 478,727
Distributions (3) 12,936
 3,028
 
 
 15,964
Ground rent (4) 3,516
 7,084
 7,080
 119,556
 137,236
Purchase/tenant obligations (5) 60,403
 
 
 
 60,403
Total $535,688
 $1,220,378
 $1,231,795
 $1,212,898
 $4,200,759
  2019 2020 - 2021 2022 - 2023 Thereafter Total
Long-term debt(1)
 $64,281
 $665,097
 $1,175,977
 $1,054,921
 $2,960,276
Interest payments(2)
 138,422
 236,967
 166,351
 31,455
 573,195
Distributions(3)
 3,568
 
 
 
 3,568
Ground rent/operating leases(4)
 2,267
 4,499
 3,596
 21,376
 31,738
Purchase/tenant obligations(5)
 101,987
 
 
 
 101,987
Total $310,525
 $906,563
 $1,345,924
 $1,107,752
 $3,670,764

(1)Represents principal maturities only and therefore excludes net fair value adjustments of $12,661, debt issuance costs of $(14,639) and bond discount of $(47) as of December 31, 2016. In addition, the principal maturities reflect any available extension options within the control of the Company.
(2)Variable rate interest payments are estimated based on the LIBOR rate at December 31, 2016.
(3)Since there is no required redemption, distributions on the Series H Preferred Shares/Units, Series I Preferred Shares/Units and Series I-1 Preferred Units may be paid in perpetuity; for purposes of this table, such distributions were included through the optional redemption dates of August 10, 2017, March 27, 2018 and March 27, 2018, respectively.
(4)Represents minimum future lease payments due through the end of the initial lease term.
(5)Includes amounts due under executed leases and commitments to vendors for development and other matters.
(1)Represents principal maturities only and therefore excludes net fair value adjustments of $5,764, debt issuance costs of $(18,883) and bond discount of $(9,680) as of December 31, 2018. In addition, the principal maturities reflect any available extension options within the control of the Company.
(2)Variable rate interest payments are estimated based on the LIBOR rate and our credit ratings in place at December 31, 2018. Due to the credit rating downgrade that occurred subsequent to December 31, 2018, we expect an increase of approximately $39.7 million in interest payments over the periods presented as a result of the new pricing grid based on the LIBOR rate in place at December 31, 2018.
(3)Since there is no required redemption, distributions on the Series H Preferred Shares/Units, Series I Preferred Shares/Units and Series I-1 Preferred Units may be paid in perpetuity; for purposes of this table, such distributions are included upon declaration by the Board as the optional redemption dates have lapsed.
(4)Represents minimum future lease payments due through the end of the initial lease term under executed leases.
(5)Includes amounts due under executed leases and commitments to vendors for development and other matters.

The following table summarizes the material aspects of the Company's proportionate share of future obligations for unconsolidated entities as of December 31, 2016,2018, assuming the obligations remain outstanding through initial maturities (in thousands):
 2017 2018 - 2019 2020 - 2021 Thereafter Total 2019 2020 - 2021 2022 - 2023 Thereafter Total
Long-term debt (1) $1,766
 $3,831
 $42,809
 $367,796
 $416,202
 $3,346
 $73,488
 $20,062
 $528,068
 $624,964
Interest payments(2) 16,907
 33,514
 30,329
 50,410
 131,160
 25,926
 50,690
 42,446
 44,589
 163,651
Ground rent (2) 1,929
 4,089
 4,320
 121,473
 131,811
Ground rent/operating leases(3)
 3,939
 7,942
 8,053
 189,002
 208,936
Purchase/tenant obligations (3)(4) 6,702
 
 
 
 6,702
 14,921
 
 
 
 14,921
Total $27,304
 $41,434
 $77,458
 $539,679
 $685,875
 $48,132
 $132,120
 $70,561
 $761,659
 $1,012,472

(1)Represents principal maturities only and therefore excludes net fair value adjustments of $7,718 and debt issuance costs of $(1,710) as of December 31, 2016. In addition, the principal maturities reflect any available extension options.
(2)Represents minimum future lease payments due through the end of the initial lease term.
(3)Includes amounts due under executed leases and commitments to vendors for development and other matters.
(1)Represents principal maturities only and therefore excludes net fair value adjustments of $5,372 and debt issuance costs of $(2,451) as of December 31, 2018. In addition, the principal maturities reflect any available extension options.
(2)Variable rate interest payments are estimated based on the LIBOR rate at December 31, 2018.
(3)Represents minimum future lease payments due through the end of the initial lease term under executed leases.
(4)Includes amounts due under executed leases and commitments to vendors for development and other matters.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Off-balance sheet arrangements consist primarily of investments in joint ventures which are common in the real estate industry. Joint ventures typically fund their cash needs through secured debt financings obtained by and in the name of the joint venture entity. The joint venture debt is secured by a first mortgage, is without recourse to the joint venture partners, and does not represent a liability of the partners, except to the extent the partners or their affiliates expressly guarantee the joint venture debt. As of December 31, 2016,2018, there were no guarantees of joint venture related mortgage indebtedness. In addition to obligations under mortgage indebtedness, our joint ventures have obligations under ground leases and purchase/tenant obligations. Our share of obligations under joint venture debt, ground leases and purchase/tenant obligations is quantified in the unconsolidated entities table within "Contractual Obligations" above. WPG may elect to fund cash needs of a joint venture through equity contributions (generally on a basis proportionate to our ownership interests), advances or partner loans, although such fundings are not required contractually or otherwise.
Equity Activity
The SeparationPreferred Stock
Prior to our May 28, 2014 separation from SPG, the financial statements were carved-out from SPG's books and records; thus, pre-separation ownership was solely that of SPG and noncontrolling interests based on their respective ownership interests in SPG L.P. on the date of separation (see "Overview—Basis of Presentation" for more information). Upon becoming a separate company on May 28, 2014, WPG Inc.'s ownership is now classified under the typical stockholders' equity classifications of common stock, capital in excess of par value and retained earnings, while WPG L.P.'s ownership has always been reflected under typical partnership classifications. Related to the separation, 155,162,597 shares of WPG Inc. common stock were issued to common shareholders of SPG, with a like number of common units issued by WPG L.P. to WPG Inc. as consideration for the common shares issued, and 31,575,487 WPG L.P. common units were issued to limited partners of SPG L.P.Series H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
The Merger
Related to the Merger completed onOn January 15, 2015, WPG Inc. issued 29,942,877 common4,000,000 shares 4,700,000 Series G Preferred Shares, 4,000,000of 7.5% Series H Preferred Shares and 3,800,000 Series I Preferred Shares, and WPG L.P. issued to WPG Inc. a like number of common andconvert the preferred units as consideration for the common and preferred shares issued. Additionally, WPG L.P. issued to limited partners 1,621,695 common units and 130,592 WPG L.P. Series I‑1 Preferred Units. The preferred shares and units were issued as consideration for similarly-named preferred interestsstock of GRT that were outstanding at the Merger date.
On April 15, 2015,time of merger. Dividends accrue quarterly at an annual rate of 7.5% per share. WPG Inc. redeemed all of the 4,700,000 issued and outstanding Series G Preferred Shares, resultingcan redeem this series, in WPG L.P. redeeming a like number of preferred units under terms identical to those of the Series G Preferred Shares described below. The Series G Preferred Shares were redeemedwhole or in part, at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid distributions updividends. WPG L.P. issued to but excluding,WPG Inc. a like number of preferred units as consideration for the Series H Preferred Shares and can redeem this series, in whole or in part, when WPG Inc. can redeem the Series H Preferred Shares at like terms. All shares remain issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
On January 15, 2015, WPG Inc. issued 3,800,000 shares of 6.875% Series I Preferred Shares to convert the preferred stock of GRT outstanding at the time of merger. Dividends accrue quarterly at an annual rate of 6.875% per share. WPG Inc. can redeem this series, in whole or in part, at a redemption date, in an amount equal to $0.5868price of $25.00 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends. WPG L.P. issued to WPG Inc. a like number of preferred units as consideration for a total payment of $25.5868 per share. This redemption amount includes the first quarter dividend of $0.5078 per share that was declared on February 24, 2015 to holders of record of such Series GI Preferred Shares on March 31, 2015. Because the redemption ofand can redeem this series, in whole or in part, when WPG Inc. can redeem the Series GI Preferred Shares was a redemption in full, tradingat like terms. All shares remain issued and outstanding as of the Series G Preferred Shares on the NYSE ceased after the redemption date. TheDecember 31, 2018 and 2017.

aggregate amount paid to effect the redemptions of the Series G Preferred Shares was approximately $120.3 million, which was funded with cash on hand.
Exchange Rights
Subject to the terms of the limited partnership agreement of WPG L.P., limited partners in WPG L.P. have, at their option, the right to exchange all or any portion of their units for shares of WPG Inc. common stock on a one‑for‑one basis or cash, as determined by WPG Inc. Therefore, the common units held by limited partners are considered by WPG Inc. to be share equivalents and classified as noncontrolling interests within permanent equity, and classified by WPG L.P. as permanent equity. The amount of cash to be paid if the exchange right is exercised and the cash option is selected will be based on the market value of WPG Inc.'s common stock as determined pursuant to the terms of the WPG L.P. Partnership Agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2017, WPG Inc. issued 314,577 shares of common stock to a limited partner of WPG L.P. in exchange for an equal number of units pursuant to the WPG L.P. Partnership Agreement. This transaction increased WPG Inc.’s ownership interest in WPG L.P. There were no similar transactions during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2016. At December 31, 2016,2018, WPG Inc. had reserved 35,127,73534,755,660 shares of common stock for possible issuance upon the exchange of units held by limited partners.
The holders of the Series I-1 Preferred Units have, at their option, the right to have their units purchased by WPG L.P. subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. Therefore, these preferred units are classified as redeemable noncontrolling interests outside of permanent equity.
Share Based Compensation
On May 28, 2014, the Board adopted the Washington Prime Group, L.P. 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), which permits the Company to grant awards to current and prospective directors, officers, employees and consultants of the Company or anany affiliate. An aggregate of 10,000,000 shares of common sharesstock has been reserved for issuance under the Plan. In addition, the maximum number of awards to be granted to a participant in any calendar year is 500,000 shares/units. Awards may be in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units ("RSUs") or other stock-based awards in WPG Inc., LTIPslong term incentive units ("LTIP units" or "LTIPs") or performance units ("Performance LTIP Units") in WPG L.P. The Plan terminates on May 28, 2024.
Long Term Incentive Awards
Time Vested LTIP Awards
The Company has issued time-vested LTIP units ("Inducement LTIP Units") to certain executive officers and employees under the Plan, pursuant to LTIP Unit Award Agreements between the Company and each of the grant recipients. These awards will vest and the related fair value will be expensed over a four-year vesting period. During the yearyears ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Company did not grant any Inducement LTIP Units.
During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company awarded 203,215 and 283,610 Inducement LTIP Units, respectively, to certain executive officers and employees of the Company under the Plan, pursuant to LTIP Unit Award Agreements between the Company and each of the grant recipients.
The fair value of the Inducement LTIP Units of $8.4 million is being recognized as expense over the applicable vesting period. As of December 31, 2016,2018, the estimated future compensation expense for Inducement LTIP Units was $1.0 million.$37,500. The weighted average period over which the compensation expense will be recorded for the Inducement LTIP Units is approximately 2.00.2 years.
Performance Based Awards
2015 Awards
During 2015, the Company authorized the award of LTIP units subject to certain market conditions under Accounting Standards CodificationASC 718 ("Performance LTIP Units") to certain executive officers and employees of the Company in the maximum total amount of 304,818 units, to be earned and related fair value expensed over the applicable performance periods, except in certain instances that could result in accelerated vesting due to severance arrangements.
The Performance LTIP Units that were allocated during the year ended December 31, 2015 are market based awards with a service condition. Recipients may earncould have earned between 0% - 100%-100% of the award based on the Company's achievement of absolute and relative (versus the MSCI REIT Index) total shareholder return ("TSR") goals, with 40% of the Performance LTIP Units available to be earned with respect to each performance period based on achievement of absolute TSR goals, and 60% of the Performance LTIP Units available to be earned with respect to each performance period based on achievement of relative TSR goals. The Performance LTIP Units issued during 2015 relate to the following performance periods: from the beginning of the service period to (i) December 31, 2016 ("2015-First Special PP"), (ii) December 31, 2017 ("2015-Second Special PP"), and (iii) December 31, 2018 ("2015-Third Special PP"). There was no award for the 2015-First Special PP, since our TSR was below the threshold level during 2016.

2014 Awards
During 2014, the Company awarded Performance LTIP Units subject to performance conditions described below to certain executive officers and employees of the Company in the maximum total amount of 451,017 units to be earned and related fair value expensed over the applicable performance periods, except in certain instances that result in accelerated vesting due to severance arrangements.
The Performance LTIP Units that were issued during the year ended December 31, 2014 are market based awards with a service condition. Recipients may earn between 0% - 100% of the award based on the Company's achievement of TSR goals. The Performance LTIP Units issued during 2014 relate to the following performance periods: from the beginning of the service period to (i) December 31, 2015 ("2014-First Special PP"), (ii) December 31, 2016 ("2014-Second Special PP"), and (iii) December 31, 2017 ("2014-Third Special PP"). There was no award for the 2014-First2015-Second Special PP, or 2014-Second2015-Third Special PP since our TSR was below the threshold level during 20152016, 2017, and 2016,2018, respectively.
The number
Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards
During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company approved the terms and conditions of Performance LTIP Units earnedthe 2018 and 2017 annual awards (the "2018 Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards" and "2017 Long-Term Incentive Awards," respectively) for certain executive officers and employees of the Company. Under the terms of the awards program, each participant is provided the opportunity to receive (i) time-based RSUs and (ii) performance-based stock units ("PSUs"). RSUs represent a contingent right to receive one WPG Inc. common share for each vested RSU. RSUs will vest in respectone-third installments on each annual anniversary of the respective Grant Date (as referenced below), subject to the participant's continued employment with the Company through each performancevesting date and the participant's continued compliance with certain applicable covenants. During the service period, dividend equivalents will be determined aspaid with respect to the RSUs corresponding to the amount of any dividends paid by the Company to the Company's common shareholders for the applicable dividend payment dates. Compensation expense is recognized on a percentagestraight-line basis over the three year vesting term, except in instances that result in accelerated vesting due to severance arrangements. Actual PSUs earned may range from 0%-150% of the maximum,PSUs allocated to the award recipient, based on the Company's achievementTSR compared to a peer group based on companies with similar assets and revenue over a three-year performance period that commenced on the respective Grant Date (as referenced below). During the performance period, dividend equivalents corresponding to the amount of absoluteany regular cash dividends paid by the Company to the Company’s common shareholders for the applicable dividend payment dates will accrue and relative (versusbe deemed reinvested in additional PSUs, which will be settled in common shares at the MSCI REIT Index) TSR goals, with 40%same time and only to the extent that the underlying PSU is earned and settled in common shares. Payout of the Performance LTIP Units available to be earned with respect to each performance period based on achievement of absolute TSR goals, and 60% of the Performance LTIP Units available to be earned with respect to each performance period based on achievement of relative TSR goals.
Vesting
The Performance LTIP awards that are earned, if any, will then bePSUs is also subject to a service-based vesting period. The vesting date would be January 15, 2018 for the 2015-Second Special PP. Awards earned underparticipant’s continued employment with the 2015-Third Special PP would vest immediately uponCompany through the conclusionend of the performance period. The PSUs were valued through the use of a Monte Carlo model and the related compensation expense is recognized over the three-year performance period, and would require no subsequent service.except in instances that result in accelerated amortization due to severance arrangements.
Awards earned underThe following table summarizes the 2014-Third Special PP would vest immediately upon the conclusionissuance of the performance period and would require no subsequent service.
2018 Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards and 2017 Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards, respectively:
 2018 Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards 2017 Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards
Grant DateFebruary 20, 2018 February 21, 2017
RSUs issued587,000 358,198
Grant date fair value per unit$6.10 $9.58
PSUs issued587,000 358,198
Grant date fair value per unit$4.88 $7.72
During 2016, the Company approved the performance criteria and maximum dollar amount of the 2016 annual awards (the "2016 Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards"), that generally range from 30%-100% of actual base salary, earnings unless otherwise determined by contract, for certain executive officers and employees of the Company. The number of awards iswas determined by converting the cash value of the award to a number of restricted stock unitsRSUs (the "Allocated RSUs") based on the average closing price of WPG Inc.'s common shares for the final 15 trading days of 2016. Recipients areEventual recipients were eligible to receive a percentage of the Allocated RSUs based on the Company's performance on its strategic goals detailed in the Company's 2016 cash bonus plan and the Company's relative TSR compared to a peer group based on companies with similar assets operations, and revenue. Payout for 50% of the Allocated RSUs iswas based on the Company's performance on the strategic goals and the payout on the remaining 50% iswas based on the Company's TSR performance. Any 2016 Allocated RSUs earned will be granted in 2017 and vest one-third on each of January 1, 2018, 2019 and 2020. The fair value of the awards related to the Company's TSR performance will be expensed over the period from May 17, 2016 (when service began and award was approved by the Compensation Committee) through the end of the vesting period. If earned, the fair value of the portion of the awards based upon the Company's performance of the strategic goals will be recognized as expense over the period from the 2017 grant date through the end of the vesting period. Both the strategic goal component as well as the TSR performance were achieved at target, resulting in a 100% payout. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company awarded 324,237 Allocated RSUs, with a grant date fair value of $2.2 million, related to the 2016 Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards, which will vest in one-third installments on each of February 21, 2018, 2019 and 2020, subject to the participant's continued employment with the Company through each vesting date and the participant's continued compliance with certain applicable covenants.

During 2015, the Company approved the performance criteria and maximum dollar amount of the 2015 annual LTIP unit awards (the "2015 Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards"), that generally range from 30%-300% of actual base salary earnings, for certain executive officers and employees of the Company. The number of awards iswas determined by converting the cash value of the award to a number of LTIP units (the "Allocated Units") based on the average closing price of WPG Inc.'s common shares for the final 15 trading days of 2015. Eventual recipients were eligible to receive a percentage of the Allocated Units based on the Company's performance on its strategic goals detailed in the Company's 2015 cash bonus plan and the Company's relative TSR compared to the MSCI REIT Index. Payout for 40% of the Allocated Units was based on the Company's performance on the strategic goals and the payout on the remaining 60% was based on the Company's TSR performance. The strategic goal component was achieved in 2015; however, the TSR was below threshold performance, resulting in only a 40% payout for this annual LTIP award. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company awarded 323,417 LTIP units related to the 2015 Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards, of which 108,118 vest in one-third installments on each of January 1, 2017, 2018 and 2019.2019, subject to the participant's continued employment with the Company through each vesting date and the participant's continued compliance with certain applicable covenants. The 94,106 LTIP units awarded to our former Executive Chairman fully vested on the grant date and the 121,193 LTIP units awarded to certain former executive officers fully vested on the applicable severance datedates during 2016 pursuant to the underlying severance arrangements.

The fair value of the portion of the awards based upon the Company's performance of the strategic goals was recognized to expense when granted.
WPG Restricted Share Awards
As part of the Merger,The WPG Restricted Shares relate to unvested restricted shares held by certain GRT executive employees which had an original vesting period of five years, were converted into 1,039,785 WPG restricted common shares (the “WPG Restricted Shares”). The WPG Restricted Shares will be amortized overat the remaining lifetime of the applicable vesting period, except for the portion of the awards applicable to pre-Merger service, which was included as equity consideration issued in the Merger.
The amount of compensation expense related to unvested restricted shares that we expect to recognize in future periods is $0.8 million$33,000 over a weighted average period of 1.60.3 years. During the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, the aggregate intrinsic value of shares that vested was $9.6 million.$43,900. As of December 31, 2016, 150,5792018, 9,033 WPG Restricted Shares were outstanding.
WPG Restricted Stock Unit Awards
The Company issues restricted stock units ("RSUs")RSUs to certain executive officers, employees, and non-employee directors of the Board of Directors (see "Board of Directors Compensation" for discussion regarding RSUs issued to non-employee directors). The RSUs are service-based awards and the related fair value is expensed over the applicable service periods, except in instances that result in accelerated vesting due to severance arrangements. During the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, the Company issued 409,031673,792 RSUs under the Plan with a fair value of $4.8$4.2 million, of which 284,483587,000 RSUs with a fair value of $3.3$3.6 million relates to Mr. Louis G. Conforti's appointment as the Company's CEOannual long-term incentive award issuances that occurred in October 2016.February 2018 (see "Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards" section above). As of December 31, 2016, 437,2732018, 1,430,665 unvested RSUs were outstanding. The amount of compensation related to the unvested RSUs that we expect to recognize in future periods is $5.2 million.$6.2 million over a weighted average period of 1.6 years.
Board of Directors Compensation
During 2016, we modified certain components of our director compensation program. From January 1, 2016 to June 20, 2016 (the “Period”), our non-employee members of the Board received as compensation for their services an $80,000 stipend paid in cash and $120,000 in equity awards in the form of RSU grants (the “Director Retainer Package”). Also, a current director, pursuant to a transition and consulting agreement, dated May 31, 2015, as amended, received a stipend of $350,000 per year, the Director Retainer Package, another stipend of $100,000 per year (the “Chairman Fee”) for serving as the non-executive Chairman of the Board during the Period, and was granted 5,332 RSUs, which vested on May 28, 2016. During the Period, the then non-employee directors were each granted 12,060 RSUs with an aggregate grant date fair value of $720,000, which is being recognized as an expense over the vesting period ending on May 28, 2017.
On June 20, 2016, the Board modified Board compensation and approved an increase in the cash component of the Director Retainer Package from $80,000 to $110,000 with no changes to the equity portion of the package. Additional RSU grants of 11,331 were made on June 20, 2016 to each of the two new directors that joined the Board on that date. These grants had an aggregate grant date fair value of $240,000 which is being recognized as expense over the vesting period ending May 28, 2017. Another RSU grant of 8,727 was issued to another new director elected to the Board on August 30, 2016. This grant had an aggregate grant date fair value of $120,000 which is also being recognized as expense over the vesting period ending May 28, 2017. In connection with the election of the two new directors on June 20, 2016, the non-executive Chairman resigned from the position of non-executive Chairman and payment of the Chairman Fee to him for serving in that position was discontinued. In connection with the resignation, the Board elected a current director to serve as Chairman of the Board, and the Governance and Nominating Committee approved an annual stipend of $350,000 for the new Chairman to serve in that capacity in addition to the Director Retainer Package.
In August 2016, an additional director retired from the Board and the Compensation Committee approved the acceleration of the vesting date of certain RSUs that were awarded in May 2016 from May 17, 2017 to August 30, 2016. In connection with the resignation of an additional director on June 20, 2016, the Compensation Committee also accelerated the vesting date of the RSUs that were received in May 2016 as part of the Director Retainer Package from May 17, 2017 to June 20, 2016. Additionally, Mr. Conforti became our Interim CEO on June 20, 2016 and at that time became ineligible to receive the Director Retainer Package as an employee director. Mr. Conforti forfeited the RSUs he received in May 2016 after being appointed Interim CEO. Lastly, the Board formed a special ad hoc committee of five disinterested directors at the beginning of 2016 to review, assess, and evaluate certain strategic alternatives for the Company. The Committee was instituted from January 2016 until August 2016. To compensate the special committee members for the additional time and work they assumed in serving on the committee during the course of 2016, special cash stipends were approved by the Nominating and Governance Committee for each of the special committee members. Two of the directors, including Mr. Conforti, received $500,000 each and three of the directors received $50,000 each.
On May 21, 2015,18, 2018, the Board approved annual compensation for the period of May 28, 201529, 2018 through May 27, 201628, 2019 for the non-employee members of the Board. Each non-employee director's annual compensation (other than the Board Chairman who receives annual compensation of $450,000) totaled $200,000$230,000 based on a combination of cash and RSUs granted under the Plan. During 2015,2018, the fivesix non-employee directors were each granted RSUs for 8,403138,648 shares with an aggregate grant date fair value of $600,000,$940,000, which wasis being recognized as expense over the vesting period ending on May 28, 2016.

2019.
Stock Options
Options granted under the Company's Plan generally vest over a three year period, with options exercisable at a rate of 33.3% per annum beginning with the first anniversary on the date of the grant. These options were valued using the Black-Scholes pricing model and the expenses associated with these options are amortized over the requisite vesting period.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, 247,5002018, no stock options were granted from the Plan to employees, 53,080no stock options were exercised by employees and 362,025114,273 stock options were canceled, forfeited or expired. As of December 31, 2016,2018, there were 977,576679,741 stock options outstanding.

Share Award Related Compensation Expense
During the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, the Company recorded share award related compensation expense pertaining to the award and option plans noted above within the consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) as indicated below (amounts(dollars in millions):
 For the Year Ended December 31, For the Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014 2018 2017 2016
Merger, restructuring and transaction costs $9.5
 $4.0
 $
 $
 $
 $9.5
General and administrative 4.6
 10.1
 1.8
General and administrative and property operating 8.3
 6.4
 4.6
Total expense $14.1
 $14.1
 $1.8
 $8.3
 $6.4
 $14.1
Distributions
During each of the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, the Board declared common share/unit dividends of $1.00 per common share/unit, respectively.unit.
On February 21, 2017,12, 2019, the Board declared common share/unit dividends of $0.25 per common share.share/unit. The dividend is payable on March 15, 20172019 to shareholders/unitholders of record on March 8, 2017.
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests for WPG Inc.
The non-controlling interests in both the Arbor Hills joint venture and the Oklahoma City Properties joint venture are redeemable at the option of the holders under certain circumstances according to the terms of the respective joint venture agreements. These noncontrolling interests are presented as redeemable noncontrolling interests outside of permanent equity on the Company's consolidated balance sheets for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. The Company adjusts the carrying amount of the redeemable noncontrolling interests to their maximum redemption value at the end of each reporting period, after allocating their pro-rata amount of net income (loss) and any contributions received, or distributions to, the redeemable noncontrolling interests. Changes in the redemption value of the redeemable noncontrolling interests are recorded within shareholder’s equity. Future reductions in the carrying amounts are limited to the original recorded fair value of the redeemable noncontrolling interests. The Company estimates the maximum redemption amounts based upon the terms of the applicable joint venture agreement, using Level 3 inputs such as: expected market capitalization rates, discount rates, and estimated future cash flows. As part of the Company's fourth quarter 2016 evaluation, the Company recorded an adjustment of $5.5 million to redeemable noncontrolling interest in order to reflect the redeemable noncontrolling interest at maximum redemption value, which we believe approximates the fair value for such interests.4, 2019.
Acquisitions and Dispositions
Buy-sell, marketing rights, and other exit mechanisms are common in real estate partnership agreements. Most of our partners are institutional investors who have a history of direct investment in retail real estate. We and our partners in our joint venture properties may initiate these provisions (subject to any applicable lock up or similar restrictions). If we determine it is in our shareholders' best interests for us to purchase the joint venture interest and we believe we have adequate liquidity to execute the purchase without hindering our cash flows, then we may initiate these provisions or elect to buy. If we decide to sell any of our joint venture interests, we expect to use the net proceeds to reduce outstanding indebtedness or to reinvest in development, redevelopment, or expansion opportunities.
Acquisitions.    We pursue the acquisition of properties that meet our strategic criteria.
On January 15, 2015, we acquiredApril 24, 2018, the Merger PropertiesCompany closed on the acquisition of Southgate Mall for $58.0 million (see details under "Overview - Basis of Presentation - Southgate Mall").
On April 11, 2018, the Company closed on the acquisition of four Sears anchor parcels and related outparcels for $28.5 million (see details under "Overview - Basis of Presentation - Sears Parcel Acquisitions").
On March 2, 2017, the O'Connor Joint Venture I completed the acquisition of Pearlridge Uptown II (see details under "Overview - Basis of Presentation - The Merger" above)O'Connor Joint Ventures").

On January 13, 2015, we acquired Canyon View Marketplace, a 43,000 square foot shopping center located in Grand Junction, Colorado, for $10.0 million including the assumption of an existing mortgage with a principal balance of $5.5 million. The source of funding for the acquisition was cash on hand.
Dispositions.    We pursue the disposition of properties that no longer meet our strategic criteria or interests in properties to generate proceeds for alternative business uses.
On February 11, 2019, we completed the sale of the seventh tranche of restaurant outparcels which consisted of one outparcel and an allocated purchase price of approximately $2.8 million of the total purchase price (see details under "Overview - Basis of Presentation - Outparcel Sale"). The Company received net proceeds of approximately $2.7 million, which were used to reduce corporate debt and for ongoing redevelopment efforts.
On January 18, 2019, we completed the sale of the sixth tranche of restaurant outparcels which consisted of eight outparcels and an allocated purchase price of approximately $9.4 million of the total purchase price (see details under "Overview - Basis of Presentation - Outparcel Sale"). The Company received net proceeds of approximately $9.4 million, which were used to reduce corporate debt and for ongoing redevelopment efforts.
On November 16, 2018, we completed the sale of the fifth tranche of restaurant outparcels which consisted of one outparcel and an allocated purchase price of approximately $3.2 million of the total purchase price (see details under "Overview - Basis of Presentation - Outparcel Sale"). The Company received net proceeds of approximately $3.2 million, which were used to reduce corporate debt and for ongoing redevelopment efforts.
On October 31, 2018, we completed the sale of the fourth tranche of restaurant outparcels which consisted of two outparcels and an allocated purchase price of approximately $1.7 million of the total purchase price (see details under "Overview - Basis of Presentation - Outparcel Sale"). The Company received net proceeds of approximately $1.7 million, which were used to reduce corporate debt and for ongoing redevelopment efforts.

On July 27, 2018, we completed the sale of the third tranche of restaurant outparcels which consisted of two outparcels and an allocated purchase price of approximately $4.6 million of the total purchase price (see details under "Overview - Basis of Presentation - Outparcel Sale"). The Company received net proceeds of approximately $4.5 million, which were used to reduce corporate debt and for ongoing redevelopment efforts.
On June 29, 2018, we completed the sale of the second tranche of restaurant outparcels which consisted of 5 outparcels and an allocated purchase price of approximately $9.5 million of the total purchase price (see details under "Overview - Basis of Presentation - Outparcel Sale"). The Company received net proceeds of approximately $9.4 million, which were used to reduce corporate debt and for ongoing redevelopment efforts.
On January 12, 2018, we completed the sale of the first tranche of restaurant outparcels which consisted of 10 outparcels and an allocated purchase price of approximately $13.7 million of the total purchase price (see details under "Overview - Basis of Presentation - Outparcel Sale"). The net proceeds were used to fund a portion of the acquisition of the Sears parcels on April 11, 2018 and for general corporate purposes.
In connection with the 2018 sales noted above, the Company recorded a net gain of $25.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, which is included in gain (loss) on disposition of interests in properties, net in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2018.
On November 3, 2017, we completed the sale of Colonial Park Mall to an unaffiliated private real estate investor for a purchase price of $15.0 million. The net proceeds were used for general corporate purposes.
On June 13, 2017, we sold 49% of our interest in Malibu Lumber Yard as part of the O'Connor Joint Venture II transaction (see details under "Overview - Basis of Presentation - The O'Connor Joint Ventures").
On June 7, 2017, we completed the sale of Morgantown Commons, to a private real estate investor for a purchase price of approximately $6.7 million. The net proceeds were used for general corporate purposes.
On May 16, 2017, we completed the sale of an 80,000 square foot vacant anchor parcel at Indian Mound Mall to a private real estate investor for a purchase price of approximately $0.8 million. The net proceeds were used for general corporate purposes.
On May 12, 2017, we completed the transaction forming the O'Connor Joint Venture II with regard to the ownership and operation of six of the Company's retail properties and certain related outparcels. Under the terms of the joint venture agreement, we retained a 51% non-controlling interest and sold a 49% interest to O'Connor, the third party partner (see details under "Overview - Basis of Presentation - The O'Connor Joint Ventures").
On February 21, 2017, we completed the sale of Gulf View Square and River Oaks Center to private real estate investors for an aggregate purchase price of $42$42.0 million. The Company used the net proceeds from the transaction were used to reduce the balance of corporate debt.
On January 10, 2017, we completed the sale of Virginia Center Commons to a private real estate investor for a purchase price of $9$9.0 million. The Company used the net proceeds to reduce the balance of corporate debt.
On November 10, 2016, we completed the sale of Richmond Town Square to a private real estate investor for a purchase price of $7.3 million. The Company used the net proceeds to reduce the balance of corporate debt.
On November 2, 2016, we entered into a definitive agreement providing for an additional joint venture with O'Connor with respect to the ownership and operation of seven of the Company's retail properties (see details under "Overview - Basis of Presentation - The O'Connor Joint Venture"). The Company expects to close on this transaction during the second quarter of 2017.
On August 19, 2016, the Company completed the sale of Knoxville Center to a private real estate investor (the "Buyer") for a purchase price of $10.1 million. The sales price consisted of $3.9 million paid to the Company at closing and the issuance of a promissory note for $6.2 million from the Buyer to the Company with an interest rate of 5.5% per annum. The note balance is due on February 28, 2017, with one six-month extension available to the Buyer. As of December 31, 2016, the Buyer was current on their interest payments. The net proceeds from the transactions were used to reduce the balance outstanding under the Revolver.
On January 29, 2016, we completed the sale of Forest Mall and Northlake Mall to private real estate investors (the "Buyers") for an aggregate purchase price of $30 million, which was classified as real estate held for sale on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015. The sales price consisted of $10 million paid to us at closing and the issuance of a promissory note for $20 million from us to the Buyers with an interest rate of 6% per annum. On June 29, 2016, the Buyers repaid $4.4 million of the promissory note balance and exercised a six-month extension option. The remaining $15.6 million note balance was repaid in full on January 4, 2017. The proceeds from the transaction were used to reduce the balance outstanding under the Facility.corporate debt.
In connection with the 20162017 sales noted above, the Company recorded a $2.0net gain of $124.8 million, net loss, which is included in gain (loss) gain on disposition of interest in properties, net in the consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2016.2017.
On December 29, 2016, June 9, 2016 and April 28, 2016, River ValleyOctober 23, 2018, Rushmore Mall Merritt Square Mall and Chesapeake Square werewas transitioned to the lenders, respectivelylender (see "Financing and Debt" above for further discussion). Upon the ownership transfers,transfer, we reduced our debt by $160.1$94.0 million.
On June 1, 2015, we completed the transaction forming the O'Connor Joint Venture with regardOctober 3, 2017, Valle Vista Mall was transitioned to the lender (see "Financing and Debt" above for further discussion). Upon the ownership and operation of the O'Connor Properties, consisting of five oftransfer, we reduced our enclosed retail properties and certain related out-parcels acquired in the Merger. Under the terms of the joint venture agreement, we retained a 51% interest and sold a 49% interest to the third party partner (see details under "Overview - Basis of Presentation - The O'Connor Joint Venture").debt by $40.0 million.
Development Activity
New Development, Expansions and Redevelopments.  We routinely incur costs related to construction for significant redevelopment and expansion projects at our properties. We expect ourOur share of development costs for calendar year 20172018 related to these activities to bewas approximately $125 to $150$117 million. Our estimated stabilized return or yield, on invested capital typically ranges between 8% and 11%.
We have identified 28 department stores (currently vacant or anticipated vacancies) in our portfolio that we plan to redevelop and we are actively working on repositioning 24 of the locations. These department stores represent an opportunity to enhance the experience at the property by bringing in offerings such as dining, grocery, entertainment, home furnishings, mixed-use components as well as dynamic retail offerings. These stores are in our Tier 1 and open air properties and exclude department stores that are owned by third parties, such as Seritage. We project that we will invest between $300 million to $350 million over the next three to five years to complete the redevelopment of these department stores.

During the fourth quarter of 2016, we held our grand opening of our new approximately 400,000 square foot shopping center in the Houston metropolitan area, Fairfield Town Center. The investment to date on this project is $41.8 million. The total project budget for the phases that have been constructed thus far is $50 million before any available incentives with an expected yield of 7 - 9%. The project features retailers such as H-E-B, Academy Sports, Marshall's, Party City, Old Navy, and Ulta Cosmetics. In addition, a number orof dining options are at the center such as Chipotle, PeiWei, Whataburger, and Zoe's Kitchen. The project's leasing momentum is strong with over 95% of the space leased and approximately 85% open at year end with the remainder of the space expected to open by the middle of 2017. We anticipate development of additional phases of the project due to the strong tenant demand. Subsequent phases will have additions of big box retailers that will offer fashion, sporting goods, home goods and restaurants.

During the second quarter of 2014, we commenced redevelopment activities at Jefferson Valley Mall, a 556,000 square foot shopping center located in the New York City area. In 2016, a new Dick’s Sporting Goods and Ulta Cosmetic opened and the existing H&M store was relocated to a newly remodeled store and we completed the renovation of entrances, the interior update, work on a berm- which greatly enhanced the visibility of the retail property- and a new exterior signage package. Also as part of the renovation, Victoria's Secret, Bath & Body Works, Pink and White Barn Candle all expanded and renovated their stores. In addition, new retailers Charming Charlie's and Stone Rose Steakhouse are scheduled to open in 2017. The total cost of this project is expected to be approximately $41.0 million, of which we had incurred approximately $33.5 million100% leased as of December 31, 2016. The2018. During the third quarter of 2017, we approved the final phase of this new development for an additional investment of approximately $28 million, which will add an additional 130,000 square feet of new GLA to accommodate the strong demand at the project. Leasing for this new phase is over 50% committed for small shops and we have executed deals with a national theater and a national value fashion apparel retailer, and are finalizing a deal with an additional big box user.
At Scottsdale Quarter in Scottsdale, Arizona, our most recent redevelopment is substantially complete and will be finished in 2017 witheffort involves the remainderfinal phase of the new store openings and the completionsignificant expansion of our initial development of the food court renovations.
project. The first part of the expansion has been completed and consists of buildings on the north and south parcels of the third phase of Scottsdale Quarter ("Phase III") are constructed.  The north parcel consists of luxury apartment units with ground floor retail. The O’Connor Joint Venture, of which we own a 51% interest, sold its 25% interest in the apartment development during the third quarter of 2016. The south parcel includes a 140,000 square foot building comprised of retail and office.tenancy including American Girl is the retail anchor for the building and Design Within Reach, occupies the majority of the remaining retail space in the building.  Office tenants began moving into the south parcel building in 2015as well as luxury apartment homes and office leasing on the building is nearly complete.space. The middle parcel will be the final component of Phase III andthe expansion will be comprised of approximately 300 new luxury apartment homes and 30,000 to 35,000 square feet of new street-level retail. The street-level retail and luxury apartment homes will have substantial amenities, such as new on-site parking and roof-top terraces overlooking Scottsdale Quarter and the McDowell Mountains. On February 7, 2018, the rights to construct the luxury apartment homes on the land of this final component were sold to an unrelated third party for $12.5 million and construction has since commenced. The interest in the retail unit of the planned development was retained. Tenants are expected to begin opening in this final component in 2019.
At Great Lakes Mall in Mentor, Ohio, we commenced redevelopment of a residential componentformer Dillard’s Men’s Store. Dillard’s made the decision earlier in 2017 to consolidate its department stores at Great Lakes Mall into a single renovated anchor space. Round 1 Entertainment anchors the redevelopment and opened on March 30, 2018. Additional dining options, including Outback Steakhouse, which opened in December 2018, and new retailers are expected to open in early 2019. In addition, an outparcel building will be redeveloped to add a new Hobby Lobby store. We will invest approximately $15 million in this redevelopment with 250-300 for-rent unitsan expected yield of 7% - 9%.
At Cottonwood Mall in Albuquerque, New Mexico, we acquired the former Macy’s store for a planned redevelopment at the property. We plan to replace the former department store with two home furnishings stores, Mor Furniture for Less and Homelife Furniture, which opened in December 2018, as well as 30,000-35,000 square feeta new Hobby Lobby store, which opened in November 2018. We will invest between $20 million and $22 million in this redevelopment with an expected yield of ground floor retail and is planned for completion6% - 7%.
At Grand Central Mall in 2019. Phase III adds density at Scottsdale QuarterParkersburg, West Virginia, we replaced an Elder-Beerman with a mix of office and residential components, but the cornerstone of the development remains retail.  The total investmentnew 20,000 square foot H&M store, their first store in Phase III (including our joint venture partner's share) is expected to be approximately $117.0 million to $137.0 million, ofWest Virginia, which we had incurred approximately $85.2 million as of December 31, 2016.
Our redevelopment at Westminster Mall,opened in Westminster, California is underway with the addition of Luxe Buffet and Sky Zone in 2016, and John’s Incredible Pizza scheduled to open in 2017. The redevelopment of this center is expected to be approximately $7 million with a return of 13-15%. With the enclosed retail property located in Southern California with great visibility from I-405, we are evaluating opportunities to add density to the site.
At New Towne Mall in New Philadelphia, Ohio in 2016,October 2018. Additionally, we added a new Dick's Sporting GoodsFive Below and Ulta Beauty, which opened in September 2018, in the former hhgregg store, and we are adding a building formerly occupied by Sears. Additionally,Big Lots in the former Toys R Us location. Lastly, we have finalized our redevelopment plans for the former Sears space which will add an Ulta Cosmetics is expectedexciting exterior facing element to open during the second quartercenter featuring dynamic first-to-market retailers. This new lifestyle component will complete the transformation of 2017. The investmentGrand Central Mall from a traditional enclosed regional center into a hybrid town center. We will invest between $31 million and $33 million in this redevelopment iswith an expected to be approximately $8.5 million,yield of which we had incurred approximately $5.6 million as of December 31, 2016.6% - 8%.
At NorthwoodsDayton Mall in Peoria, IllinoisDayton, Ohio, we planhave signed leases with Ross Dress for Less and The RoomPlace to redevelopenhance the space fromretail offering at the property. Ross Dress for Less will replace a former Macy’shhgregg store that closedand The RoomPlace will be located in March 2016. We purchased thea newly combined larger store from Macy’sprevious small shop space. The estimated investment in January 2017. We will redevelopadding these two retailers to the former department store to add entertainment, food and some additional in-line retailers. The redevelopmentproperty will be anchored by a 56,000 square foot Round 1 Entertainment, the first to the market. Round 1 will provide bowling entertainment as well as foodbetween $8 million and adult beverages. In addition to Round 1 we anticipate adding dining options, a second entertainment use and new retail stores. The expected investment in this redevelopment is approximately $16$10 million with an anticipated yield of 8-9%. We anticipate completion of this project in 2018.
At Classen Curve in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma we plan to add new 28,00010% - 32,000 square feet multi-tenant buildings to the open-air center to add new retailers to the fully leased center. The investment is expected to be between $10 - $13 million with openings in late 2017. The yield on this project is expected to be 10% to 12%.
At Lincolnwood Town Center in Lincolnwood, Illinois, we have a signed lease with The Outlet Collection | Seattle, in Auburn, Washington, we planRoomPlace to replace a Marshall’s store that is scheduled to vacate in 2017 with a new Dave & Buster’s which is expected to open in 2018.take approximately two thirds of the recently vacated Carson Pirie Scott department store. The estimated investment in the anchor box replacementredevelopment will be approximately $4 to $5between $16 million and $18 million and the yield is anticipated to be 7% - 8%.
On April 11, 2018 we acquired, through a sale-leaseback transaction, four Sears department stores and adjacent Sears Auto Centers located at Longview Mall; Polaris Fashion Place®; Southern Hills Mall; and Town Center at Aurora. The purchase price was approximately $28.5 million and was funded by a combination of the Section 1031 tax proceeds from the Four Corners transaction, contributions from our joint venture partner related to their pro-rata share of the joint venture that owns Polaris Fashion Place® and availability on our Facility. We have control of these stores for future redevelopment and Sears, subject to their bankruptcy proceedings, will continue to operate under new leases.

In addition to the purchase of four Sears stores discussed above, we also proactively negotiated early termination of Sears leases to gain control of the real estate and commence redevelopment efforts at four of our Tier One assets. The first lease relates to the Sears store at Grand Central Mall, which closed in December 2018, and the redevelopment of the property is discussed above. The second lease relates to the Sears store at Southern Park Mall in Youngstown, Ohio which closed during the third quarter of 2018. We are in discussions with new tenants for the high visibility anchor space. The third lease relates to the Sears store at The Mall at Fairfield Commons in Beavercreek, Ohio, which closed in December 2018. We will be adding The RoomPlace and Round 1 Entertainment, both first to market. The RoomPlace will replace the upper level of Sears and complement the hybrid town center format with dynamic retail, dining and entertainment options. Round 1 Entertainment will replace the lower level of Sears. Both The RoomPlace and Round 1 Entertainment are expected to be approximately 9% - 11%.
At Pearlridge Centeropen in Aiea, Hawaii (“Pearlridge”), we planlate 2019. The fourth lease relates to commence a $33 million, 18-month renovation project. The project entails a refreshthe Sears store at WestShore Plaza in Tampa, Florida which will terminate at the end of the “Downtown” sectionfirst quarter of 2019, and we are currently in the center, including new tenants, an expandedentitlement process. We are actively working on redevelopment plans, and remodeled food court, new finishes and entrances. We also planadditional details will be announced in the future.
At The Outlet Collection® | Seattle, we have plans to add a new stand-alone 10,000 square foot Down To Earth natural foods-and-products store,FieldhouseUSA to the property in a new Bank of Hawaii branch, restaurant offerings including Pieologyformer Sam’s Club store. FieldhouseUSA specializes in sporting leagues, events and Five Guys Burgertournaments by offering year-round league and Fries,tournament play in team sports such as basketball, soccer, volleyball and a new 9,100 square foot men’s apparel store, Lindbergh,flag football in addition to programs such as birthday parties, corporate events, performance training and skills training. This use will opengreatly complement the recently added Dave & Buster’s at the property and we anticipate announcing further details about this exciting redevelopment in the newly renovated Downtown. Architecturally,near future. The estimated investment in the contemporary design will reflect the history of the area and take advantage of the natural lighting. In 2016, Hawaii Pacific Health commenced construction of a state of the art cancer treatment center thatredevelopment will be completed in 2017. The funding for the development will be shared pro-rata with our JV partner, resulting in our share of the investment of approximately $17between $11 million and $13 million and the expected yield on the project is 6-8%. The redevelopment will come on line at various times beginning in late 2017 and throughout 2018.
An additional project in the pipeline for future development is a Sears store at Markland Mall in Kokomo, Indiana that is scheduledanticipated to close in 2017. We are working on the plans to redevelop the Sears and have strong interest from retailers, entertainment users and restaurants.

Beyond Fairfield Town Center, we do not expect to hold material land for development. Land currently held for future development is substantially limited to the land parcels at our current centers which we may utilize for expansion of the existing centers or sales of outlots.be 9% - 10%.
Capital Expenditures.Expenditures
The following table summarizes total consolidated capital expenditures on a cash basis for the year ended December 31, 20162018 (in thousands):
 2016 2018
New developments $29,740
 $1,435
Redevelopments and expansions 75,075
 95,440
Tenant allowances 25,943
 23,464
Operational capital expenditures 23,595
 37,052
Total (1) $154,353
 $157,391
(1) Excludes capitalized interest, wages and real estate taxes, as well as expenditures for certain equipment and fixtures, commissions, and project costs, which are included in capital expenditures, net on the consolidated statement of cash flows.


Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements made in this section or elsewhere in this report may be deemed "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although we believe the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be attained, and it is possible that our actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks and uncertainties. Such factors include, but are not limited to: changes in asset quality and credit risk; ability to sustain revenue and earnings growth; changes in political, economic or market conditions generally and the real estate and capital markets specifically; the impact of increased competition; the availability of capital and financing; tenant or joint venture partner(s) bankruptcies; the failure to increase enclosed retail store occupancy and same-store operating income; risks associated with acquisitions, dispositions, development, expansion, leasing and management of properties; changes in market rental rates; trends in the retail industry; relationships with anchor tenants; risks relating to joint venture properties; costs of common area maintenance; competitive market forces; the level and volatility of interest rates; the rate of revenue increases as compared to expense increases; the financial stability of tenants within the retail industry; the restrictions in current financing arrangements or the failure to comply with such arrangements; the liquidity of real estate investments; the impact of changes to tax legislation and our tax positions; failure to qualify as a real estate investment trust; the failure to refinance debt at favorable terms and conditions; loss of key personnel; material changes in the dividend rates on securities or the ability to pay dividends on common shares or other securities; possible restrictions on the ability to operate or dispose of any partially-owned properties; the failure to achieve earnings/funds from operations targets or estimates; the failure to achieve projected returns or yields on development and investment properties (including joint ventures); expected gains on debt extinguishment; changes in generally accepted accounting principles or interpretations thereof; terrorist activities and international hostilities; the unfavorable resolution of legal or regulatory proceedings; the impact of future acquisitions and divestitures; assets that may be subject to impairment charges; and significant costs related to environmental issues. We discussed these and other risks and uncertainties under Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and other reports and statements filed by WPG Inc. and WPG L.P. with the SEC. We undertake no duty or obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments, or otherwise.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Industry practice is to evaluate real estate properties in part based on FFO, NOI and comparable NOI. We believe that these non-GAAP measures are helpful to investors because they are widely recognized measures of the performance of REITs and provide a relevant basis for our comparison among REITs. We also use these measures internally to measure the operating performance of our portfolio.
We determine FFO based on the definition set forth by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, as net income computed in accordance with GAAP:
excluding real estate related depreciation and amortization;
excluding gains and losses from extraordinary items and cumulative effects of accounting changes;
excluding gains and losses from the sales or disposals of previously depreciated retail operating properties;
excluding gains and losses upon acquisition of controlling interests in properties;
excluding impairment charges of depreciable real estate;
plus the allocable portion of FFO of unconsolidated entities accounted for under the equity method of accounting based upon economic ownership interest.
We include in FFO gains and losses realized from the sale of land, marketable and non-marketable securities, and investment holdings of non-retail real estate.
You should understand that our computation of these non-GAAP measures might not be comparable to similar measures reported by other REITs and that these non-GAAP measures:
do not represent cash flow from operations as defined by GAAP;
should not be considered as alternatives to net income determined in accordance with GAAP as a measure of operating performance; and
are not alternatives to cash flows as a measure of liquidity.

The following schedule reconciles total FFO to net income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 (in thousands, except share/unit and per share/unit amounts):
 For the Year Ended December 31, For the Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014 2018 2017 2016
Net income (loss) $77,416
 $(104,122) $205,455
Net income $108,655
 $231,593
 $77,416
Less: Preferred dividends and distributions on preferred operating partnership units (14,272) (16,217) 
 (14,272) (14,272) (14,272)
Adjustments to Arrive at FFO:            
Real estate depreciation and amortization, including joint venture impact 311,038
 352,000
 200,584
 295,900
 292,748
 311,038
Impairment loss, including loss (gain) on the sale of interests in properties and other 24,066
 143,817
 (110,988)
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest holders in properties (10) 18
 
(Gain) loss on disposition of interests in properties, net including impairment loss (3,353) (57,846) 24,066
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest holders in properties (76) (68) (10)
Noncontrolling interests portion of depreciation and amortization (147) (225) 
 (35) (27) (147)
FFO of the Operating Partnership (1) 398,091
 375,271
 295,051
 386,819
 452,128
 398,091
FFO allocable to limited partners 61,865
 58,844
 50,676
 60,062
 70,837
 61,865
FFO allocable to common shareholders/unitholders $336,226
 $316,427
 $244,375
 $326,757
 $381,291
 $336,226
            
Diluted earnings (loss) per share/unit $0.29
 $(0.55) $1.10
Diluted earnings per share/unit $0.42
 $0.98
 $0.29
Adjustments to arrive at FFO per share/unit:            
Depreciation and amortization from consolidated properties and our share of real estate depreciation and amortization from unconsolidated properties 1.41
 1.61
 1.07
 1.33
 1.32
 1.41
Impairment loss, including loss (gain) on the sale of interests in properties and other 0.10
 0.65
 (0.60)
(Gain) loss on disposition of interests in properties, net including impairment loss (0.02) (0.26) 0.10
Diluted FFO per share/unit $1.80
 $1.71
 $1.57
 $1.73
 $2.04
 $1.80
            
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic 185,633,582
 184,195,769
 155,162,597
 187,696,339
 186,829,385
 185,633,582
Weighted average limited partnership units outstanding 34,304,109
 34,303,804
 32,202,440
 34,703,770
 34,808,890
 34,304,109
Weighted average additional dilutive securities outstanding (2) 803,805
 537,483
 125,907
 603,674
 337,508
 803,805
Weighted average shares/units outstanding - diluted 220,741,496
 219,037,056
 187,490,944
 223,003,783
 221,975,783
 220,741,496

(1)FFO of the operating partnership increased by $22.8decreased $65.3 million for the year ended December 31, 20162018 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. Contributing2017. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we received $8.0 million less in FFO related to properties that were disposed of during the period January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2018. We also received $6.9 million less in FFO from properties that are now held as joint ventures. The majority of this variance can be attributed to properties that were transferred to the O'Connor Joint Venture II during the second quarter of 2017. Interest expense increased by $15.4 million of which the majority of this increase was the $31.7can be attributed to additional interest expense incurred on our corporate bonds. Additionally, we received $18.6 million reductionless in costscomparable NOI from comparable properties. Of this decrease, $8.0 million is related to co-tenancy and lost rents associated with the Mergeranchor bankruptcies, an additional $1.3 million relates to tenant reimbursement revenue decreases related to capital projects, and the $34.6$5.9 million in additional property operating expenses which were primarily driven by an increase in insurance costs. Lastly, we experienced a decrease of FFO related to the gain on the extinguishment of debt, net associated with Chesapeake Square, Merritt Square Mall and River Valley Mall. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2015,of $39.2 million. During 2017 we accelerated certain loan costs associated with the Bridge Loan. Offsetting these increases, we incurred $29.6recognized $90.6 million in corporate restructuring costs during the year ended December 31, 2016 that were not incurred during the same period in 2015. Also, we received less FFOgain, related to three following transactions: $21.2 million gain related to the Merger Properties primarily attributablediscounted payoff of the $87.3 million mortgage loan secured by Mesa Mall, a $41.6 million gain related to the partialdiscounted payoff of the $99.7 million mortgage loan secured by Southern Hills Mall; and a $27.8 million gain related to the transition of Valle Vista Mall to the mortgage lender pursuant to the terms of a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure agreement entered into by an affiliate of WPG Inc. and the mortgage lender concerning the $40.0 million mortgage loan. During 2018 we recorded a $51.4 million gain related to the transition of Rushmore Mall to the mortgage lender pursuant to the term of a deed-in-lieu of foreclose agreement entered into by an affiliate of WPG Inc. and the mortgage lender concerning the $94.0 million mortgage loan. Offsetting these decreases was $21.6 million in additional FFO received from the sale of properties intooutparcels primarily related to the O'Connor Joint Venture.sale to Four Corners (see details under "Overview - Basis of Presentation - Outparcel Sale").

(2)The weighted average additional dilutive securities for the year ended December 31, 2015 are excluded for purposes of calculating diluted earnings (loss) per share/unit because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.


We deem NOI and comparable NOI to be important measures for investors and management to use in assessing our operating performance, as these measures enable us to present the core operating results from our portfolio, excluding certain non-cash, corporate-level and nonrecurring items. Specifically, we exclude from operating income the following items in our calculations of comparable NOI:

straight-line rents and fair value rent amortization, which became more material post-Merger;amortization;
management fee allocation to promote comparability across periods; and
termination income, and out-parcel sales and material insurance proceeds, which are deemed to be outside of normal operating results.
Furthermore, we adjust for the following items in our calculation of comparable NOI:

adding NOI from Glimcher properties prior to the Merger to provide comparability across periods presented; and
removing NOI from noncore properties to present only the more meaningful results of core properties.
The following schedule reconciles comparable NOI for our core portfolio to operatingnet income and presents comparable NOI percent change for the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 (in thousands):
 For the Year Ended December 31, For the Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015  2018 2017 
Operating income $184,993
 $33,735
 
Net Income $108,655
 $231,593
 
     
Income from unconsolidated entities (541) (1,395) 
Income and other taxes 1,532
 3,417
 
Gain on extinguishment of debt, net (51,395) (90,579) 
Gain on disposition of interests in properties, net (24,602) (124,771) 
Interest expense, net 141,987
 126,541
 
Operating Income 175,636
 144,806
 
          
Depreciation and amortization 281,150
 332,469
  257,796
 258,740
 
General and administrative 37,317
 48,154
  39,090
 34,892
 
Merger, restructuring and transaction costs 29,607
 31,653
 
Impairment loss 21,879
 147,979
  
 66,925
 
Fee income (6,709) (3,890)  (9,527) (7,906) 
Management fee allocation 7,008
 16,205
  157
 612
 
Adjustment to include Glimcher NOI from prior to Merger (1) 
 4,269
 
Pro-rata share of unconsolidated joint ventures in comp NOI 46,976
 13,990
  73,109
 58,197
 
Property allocated corporate expense 12,116
 7,332
  14,591
 13,683
 
Non-comparable properties and other (2) 707
 (4,278) 
Non-comparable properties and other(1)
 (7,644) (1,464) 
NOI from sold properties (5,429) (19,341)  (5,387) (16,143) 
Termination income and outparcel sales (2,761) (884) 
Termination income (3,457) (3,492) 
Straight-line rents (928) (5,229)  (3,629) (2,122) 
Ground lease adjustments for straight-line and fair market value (15) 1,175
  50
 65
 
Fair market value & inducement adjustments to base rents (9,874) (17,627)  (8,952) (7,290) 
Less: NOI from noncore properties (3) (15,814) (17,383) 
Less: noncore properties(2)
 (6,613) (8,300) 
          
Comparable NOI - core portfolio $580,223
 $568,329
 
Comparable NOI percentage change - core portfolio 2.1% 
 
Comparable NOI - core properties $515,220
 $531,203
 
Comparable NOI percentage change (3.0)% 
 
          

(1)Represents an adjustment to add the historical NOI amounts from the 23 properties acquired in the Merger for periods prior to the January 15, 2015 Merger closing date. This adjustment is included to provide comparability across the periods presented.
(2)Represents an adjustment to remove the NOI amounts from properties not owned and operated in all periods presented, certain non-recurring expenses (such as hurricane related expenses), as well as material insurance proceeds and other non-recurring income received in the periods presented. The assets acquired as part ofThis also includes adjustments related to the Merger are included in comparable NOI, as described in note 1 above.rents from the outparcels sold to Four Corners.
(3)(2)NOI from threethe noncore enclosed retail properties was excluded from comparable NOI for the Company's core properties.held in each period presented.


Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates, primarily LIBOR. We seek to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower the overall borrowing costs by closely monitoring our variable rate debt and converting such debt to fixed rates when we deem such conversion advantageous. From time to time, we may enter into interest rate swap agreements or other interest rate hedging contracts. While these agreements are intended to lessen the impact of rising interest rates, they also expose us to the risks that the other parties to the agreements will not perform, we could incur significant costs associated with the settlement of the agreements, the agreements will be unenforceable and the underlying transactions will fail to qualify as highly effective cash flow hedges under GAAP guidance. As of December 31, 2016, $851.82018, $446.5 million (net of $7.3$8.5 million of debt issuance costs) of our aggregate consolidated indebtedness (24.3%(15.2% of total consolidated indebtedness) was subject to variable interest rates, excluding amounts outstanding under variable rate loans that have been hedged to fixed interest rates.
If LIBOR rates of interest on our variable rate debt fluctuated, our future earnings and cash flows would be impacted, depending upon the current LIBOR rates and the existence of any derivative contracts currentcurrently in effect.  Based upon our variable rate debt balance as of December 31, 2016,2018, a 50 basis point increase in LIBOR rates would result in a decrease in earnings and cash flow of $4.6$2.3 million annually and a 50 basis point decrease in LIBOR rates would result in an increase in earnings and cash flow of $4.1$2.3 million annually. This assumes that the amount outstanding under our variable rate debt remains at $851.8$446.5 million, the balance as of December 31, 2016.2018.
Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The financial statements of the Company included in this report are listed in Part IV, Item 15 of this report.
Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures
Controls and Procedures of Washington Prime Group Inc.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  WPG Inc. maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that WPG Inc. files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Because of inherent limitations, disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of disclosure controls and procedures are met.
Management of WPG Inc., with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of WPG Inc.'s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the disclosure controls and procedures of WPG Inc. were effective at a reasonable assurance level.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
As of December 31, 2016,2018, management assessed the effectiveness of WPG Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on this assessment, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2016,2018, WPG Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited our consolidated and combined financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and, as part of its audit, has issued its report, included herein on page F-3, on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.  There have not been any other changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)) that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 20162018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Controls and Procedures of Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. WPG L.P. maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that WPG L.P. files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of WPG Inc., WPG L.P.'s general partner, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Because of inherent limitations, disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of disclosure controls and procedures are met.
Management of WPG L.P., with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of WPG Inc., WPG L.P.'s general partner, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of WPG L.P.'s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of WPG Inc., WPG L.P.'s general partner, concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, WPG L.P.'s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
As of December 31, 2016,2018, management assessed the effectiveness of WPG L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on this assessment, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2016,2018, WPG L.P.’s internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited our consolidated and combined financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and, as part of its audit, has issued its report, included herein on page F-10, on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.  There have not been any other changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)) that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 20162018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B.    Other Information
None.

Part III
Item 10.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive proxy statement for our 20172019 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A.
Item 11.    Executive Compensation
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive proxy statement for our 20172019 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A.
Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive proxy statement for our 20172019 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A.
Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive proxy statement for our 20172019 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A.
Item 14.    Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive proxy statement for our 20172019 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A.

Part IV
Item 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
1.     Financial Statements
Included herein at pages F-1 through F-51.
2.     Financial Statement Schedules
The following financial statement schedule is included herein at pages F-52 through F-56:
Schedule III—Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
All other schedules for which provision is made in Regulation S-X are either not required to be included herein under the related instructions or are inapplicable or the related information is included in the footnotes to the applicable financial statement and, therefore, have been omitted.

3.     Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
Exhibit
Number
 Exhibit Descriptions
2.1 
2.2 
2.3 
2.4 
2.5
2.6
2.7
3.1 
3.2 
3.3 Articles of Amendment of Washington Prime Group Inc. Changing Name to WP Glimcher Inc. (incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on May 26, 2015).
3.4Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of WP Glimcher Inc. (as amended effective August 11, 2015) (incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed August 12, 2015).
3.5
3.63.4 
3.7Amended and Restated Bylaws of WP Glimcher Inc. (n/k/a Washington Prime Group Inc.), effective August 19, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on August 19, 2016)May 22, 2017).
3.83.5 
3.9Amended and Restated Bylaws of Washington Prime Group Inc. (incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q filed August 5, 2015).
4.1 
4.2 
4.3 
4.4
4.44.5*
4.54.6*
4.64.7*
4.74.8 

4.8
4.9 
4.94.10 

4.10Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Washington Prime Group, L.P. dated as of January 14, 2015, setting forth the Terms of Series G Preferred Units (incorporated by reference to Form 10‑K filed February 26, 2015).
4.11 
4.12 
4.13 
10.1 
10.2 
10.3 
10.4 
10.5 
10.6 
10.7 
10.8 
10.9
10.910.10 
10.10Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, by and among Washington Prime Group, L.P., as borrower, Bank of America N.A., as administrative agent and the Lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Form 8‑K filed May 29, 2014).
10.11 Amendment No. 1 to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2014, among Washington Prime Group, L.P., the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Form 8‑K filed October 17, 2014).
10.12*Transition and Consulting Agreement by and between WP Glimcher Inc. and Mark Ordan, dated as of May 31, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Form 8‑K filed June 2, 2015).
10.13*Amendment No. 1 to Transition and Consulting Agreement, dated June 20, 2016, between WP Glimcher Inc. and Mark S. Ordan (incorporated by reference to Form 10‑Q filed on August 4, 2016).
10.14
10.1510.12 
10.1610.13 

10.1710.14 
10.18Term Loan Agreement, dated as of December 10, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Form 10‑K filed on February 29, 2016).
10.19Term Loan Agreement dated June 4, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed June 5, 2015).
10.2010.15*Transition and Consulting Agreement by and between WP Glimcher Inc. and Michael J. Gaffney, dated as of December 28, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Form 10‑Q filed on May 6, 2016).
10.21*
10.2210.16*
10.2310.17*
10.2410.18*

10.25
10.19*
10.2610.20*
10.2710.21*Terms and Conditions of the Grant of Special Performance LTIP Units to Officers (incorporated by reference to Form 8‑K filed on August 28, 2014).
10.28*Terms and Conditions of the Grant of Special Performance LTIP Units to Mr. Glimcher, Mr. Yale, Ms. Tehrani and Ms. Indest (incorporated by reference to Form 10‑Q filed on May 7, 2015).
10.29*
10.3010.22*Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated January 31, 2017, by and between Washington Prime Group Inc. and Keric M. Knerr (incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on February 2, 2017).
10.31*
10.3210.23*Amended
10.24*
10.25*
10.3310.26*Conditional Offer of
10.3410.27*Series 2015A LTIP Unit Award
10.28*
10.29*
10.3510.30*
10.3610.31*
10.3710.32*
10.3810.33*
10.3910.34*
10.4010.35*

10.4110.36*
10.4210.37*Form of Series 2014 Inducement LTIP Unit Award Agreement, dated as of June 25, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Form 8‑K filed June 27, 2014).
10.43*Certificate of Designation of Series 2014 Inducement LTIP Units of Washington Prime Group, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Form 8‑K filed on June 27, 2014).
10.44*
10.4510.38*
10.4610.39*
10.4710.40*
10.4810.41*
10.4910.42*Series 2015A LTIP
12.110.43**Computation of Ratios of Earnings

12.2
10.44*
10.45*Computation of Ratios of Earnings
10.46*
21.1**
23.1**
23.2**
31.1**
31.2**
31.3**
31.4**
32.1**
32.2**
101.INS**XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
*    Compensatory plans or arrangements required to be filed pursuant to Item 15(b) of Form 10-K.
**    Filed electronically herewith.
Item 16.    Form 10-K Summary
None.

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
  WASHINGTON PRIME GROUP INC.
  WASHINGTON PRIME GROUP, L.P.
   by:Washington Prime Group Inc., its sole general partner
     
  By:/s/ LOUIS G. CONFORTI
   
Louis G. Conforti
Chief Executive Officer & Director
(Principal Executive Officer)

Dated:    February 24, 201721, 2019
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 Signature Capacity Date
      
 /s/ ROBERT J. LAIKIN Chairman of the Board of Directors February 24, 201721, 2019
 Robert J. Laikin    
      
 /s/ LOUIS G. CONFORTI Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) February 24, 201721, 2019
 Louis G. Conforti    
      
 /s/ MARK S. ORDANJ. TAGGART BIRGE Director February 24, 201721, 2019
 Mark S. OrdanJ. Taggart Birge    
      
 /s/ JOHN J. DILLON III Director February 24, 201721, 2019
 John J. Dillon III    
      
 /s/ JOHN F. LEVY Director February 24, 201721, 2019
 John F. Levy    
      
 /s/ JACQUELYN R. SOFFER Director February 24, 201721, 2019
 Jacquelyn R. Soffer    
      
 /s/ SHERYL G. VON BLUCHER Director February 24, 201721, 2019
 Sheryl G. von Blucher    
      
 /s/ MARK E. YALE Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) February 24, 201721, 2019
 Mark E. Yale    
      
 /s/ MELISSA A. INDEST SeniorExecutive Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) February 24, 201721, 2019
 Melissa A. Indest    


WASHINGTON PRIME GROUP INC. AND WASHINGTON PRIME GROUP, L.P.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  
Page
Number
Financial Statements for Washington Prime Group Inc.:  
   
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 
   
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 
   
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 
   
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 
   
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 
   
Financial Statements for Washington Prime Group, L.P.:  
   
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 
   
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 
   
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 
   
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 
   
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 
   
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements 
   
Schedule III—Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation 
   
Notes to Schedule III 


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Shareholders and the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Washington Prime Group Inc.:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Washington Prime Group Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 20162018 and 2015, and2017, the related consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income, (loss), equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. Our audit also included2018, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index to Financial Statements on Page F-1. F-1 (collectively referred to as the "consolidated financial statements"). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control— Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework), and our report dated February 21, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company's financial statements and schedule based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesmisstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An auditOur audits also includes assessingincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Washington Prime Group Inc. at December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the consolidated and combined results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Washington Prime Group Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework), and our report dated February 24, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2013.
Indianapolis, Indiana
February 24, 201721, 2019


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Shareholders and the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Washington Prime Group Inc.:
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Washington Prime Group Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Control- Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Washington Prime Group Inc.’s (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the 2018 consolidated financial statements of the Company and our report dated February 21, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Washington Prime Group Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Washington Prime Group Inc. as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016 of Washington Prime Group Inc., and our report dated February 24, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
February 24, 201721, 2019


Washington Prime Group Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(dollars in thousands, except share and par value amounts)

 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
ASSETS:        
Investment properties at cost $6,294,628
 $6,656,200
 $5,914,705
 $5,807,760
Less: accumulated depreciation 2,122,572
 2,225,750
 2,283,764
 2,139,620
 4,172,056
 4,430,450
 3,630,941
 3,668,140
Cash and cash equivalents 59,353
 116,253
 42,542
 52,019
Tenant receivables and accrued revenue, net 99,967
 91,603
 85,463
 90,314
Real estate assets held-for-sale 50,642
 30,000
Investment in and advances to unconsolidated entities, at equity 458,892
 488,071
 433,207
 451,839
Deferred costs and other assets 266,556
 303,232
 169,135
 189,095
Total assets $5,107,466
 $5,459,609
 $4,361,288
 $4,451,407
LIABILITIES:        
Mortgage notes payable $1,618,080
 $1,793,439
 $983,269
 $1,157,082
Notes payable 247,637
 246,728
 982,697
 979,372
Unsecured term loans 1,334,522
 1,332,812
 685,509
 606,695
Revolving credit facility 306,165
 275,622
 286,002
 154,460
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, and deferred revenues 309,178
 379,112
 253,862
 264,998
Distributions payable 2,992
 2,992
 2,992
 2,992
Cash distributions and losses in unconsolidated entities, at equity 15,421
 15,399
 15,421
 15,421
Total liabilities 3,833,995
 4,046,104
 3,209,752
 3,181,020
Redeemable noncontrolling interests 10,660
 6,132
 3,265
 3,265
EQUITY:        
Stockholders' Equity:        
Series H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value, 4,000,000 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively 104,251
 104,251
Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value, 3,800,000 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively 98,325
 98,325
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized,
185,427,411 and 185,304,555 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively
 19
 19
Series H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value, 4,000,000 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 104,251
 104,251
Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value, 3,800,000 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 98,325
 98,325
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 350,000,000 shares authorized;
186,074,461 and 185,791,421 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively
 19
 19
Capital in excess of par value 1,232,638
 1,225,926
 1,247,639
 1,240,483
Accumulated deficit (346,706) (214,243) (456,924) (350,594)
Accumulated other comprehensive income 4,916
 1,716
 6,400
 6,920
Total stockholders' equity 1,093,443
 1,215,994
 999,710
 1,099,404
Noncontrolling interests 169,368
 191,379
 148,561
 167,718
Total equity 1,262,811
 1,407,373
 1,148,271
 1,267,122
Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interests and equity $5,107,466
 $5,459,609
 $4,361,288
 $4,451,407

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


Washington Prime Group Inc.
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
For the Year Ended December 31,For the Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
REVENUE:          
Minimum rent$572,781
 $623,113
 $443,613
$492,169
 $516,386
 $572,781
Overage rent12,882
 14,040
 9,357
9,313
 9,115
 12,882
Tenant reimbursements236,510
 259,774
 194,884
191,319
 208,290
 236,510
Other income21,302
 24,429
 13,124
30,504
 24,331
 21,302
Total revenues843,475
 921,356
 660,978
723,305
 758,122
 843,475
EXPENSES:          
Property operating166,690
 197,287
 136,538
148,433
 146,529
 166,690
Depreciation and amortization281,150
 332,469
 197,890
257,796
 258,740
 281,150
Real estate taxes102,638
 109,548
 77,427
86,665
 89,617
 102,638
Advertising and promotion10,375
 11,635
 8,284
9,070
 9,107
 10,375
Provision for credit losses4,508
 2,022
 2,332
5,826
 5,068
 4,508
General and administrative37,317
 48,154
 10,788
39,090
 34,892
 37,317
Spin-off costs
 
 38,907
Merger, restructuring and transaction costs29,607
 31,653
 8,839

 
 29,607
Ground rent4,318
 6,874
 2,836
789
 2,438
 4,318
Impairment loss21,879
 147,979
 

 66,925
 21,879
Total operating expenses658,482
 887,621
 483,841
547,669
 613,316
 658,482
OPERATING INCOME184,993
 33,735
 177,137


 

 

Interest expense, net(136,225) (139,923) (82,428)(141,987) (126,541) (136,225)
Gain (loss) on disposition of interests in properties, net24,602
 124,771
 (1,987)
Gain on extinguishment of debt, net34,612
 
 
51,395
 90,579
 34,612
Income and other taxes(2,232) (849) (1,215)(1,532) (3,417) (2,232)
(Loss) income from unconsolidated entities(1,745) (1,247) 973
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE (LOSS) GAIN ON ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION OF INTERESTS IN PROPERTIES, NET79,403
 (108,284) 94,467
(Loss) gain upon acquisition of controlling interests and on sale of interests in properties, net(1,987) 4,162
 110,988
NET INCOME (LOSS)77,416
 (104,122) 205,455
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests10,285
 (18,825) 35,426
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY67,131
 (85,297) 170,029
Income (loss) from unconsolidated entities541
 1,395
 (1,745)
NET INCOME108,655
 231,593
 77,416
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests15,051
 34,530
 10,285
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY93,604
 197,063
 67,131
Less: Preferred share dividends(14,032) (15,989) 
(14,032) (14,032) (14,032)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS$53,099
 $(101,286) $170,029
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS$79,572
 $183,031
 $53,099
          
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE, BASIC AND DILUTED$0.29
 $(0.55) $1.10
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE, BASIC AND DILUTED$0.42
 $0.98
 $0.29
          
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS):     
Net income (loss)$77,416
 $(104,122) $205,455
Unrealized income on interest rate derivative instruments3,801
 2,037
 
Comprehensive income (loss)81,217
 (102,085) 205,455
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests10,886
 (18,504) 35,426
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common shareholders$70,331
 $(83,581) $170,029
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:     
Net income$108,655
 $231,593
 $77,416
Unrealized (loss) income on interest rate derivative instruments(1,284) 2,401
 3,801
Comprehensive income107,371
 233,994
 81,217
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests14,871
 34,927
 10,886
Comprehensive income attributable to common shareholders$92,500
 $199,067
 $70,331

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

Washington Prime Group Inc.
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows
(dollars in thousands)
For the Year Ended December 31,For the Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:          
Net income (loss)$77,416
 $(104,122) $205,455
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Net income$108,655
 $231,593
 $77,416
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization, including fair value rent, fair value debt, deferred financing costs and equity-based compensation285,632
 329,895
 198,934
259,022
 259,167
 284,960
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt, net(34,612) 
 2,894
Loss (gain) on disposition of interests in properties, net1,987
 (4,162) (110,988)
Gain on extinguishment of debt, net(51,395) (90,579) (34,612)
(Gain) loss on disposition of interests in properties and outparcels, net(24,602) (125,063) 1,987
Impairment loss21,879
 147,979
 

 66,925
 21,879
Provision for credit losses4,508
 2,022
 2,332
5,826
 5,068
 4,508
Loss (income) from unconsolidated entities1,745
 1,247
 (973)
(Income) loss from unconsolidated entities(541) (1,395) 1,745
Distributions of income from unconsolidated entities272
 223
 1,004
8,619
 1,873
 804
Changes in assets and liabilities:          
Tenant receivables and accrued revenue, net(14,790) (1,576) (8,212)327
 2,309
 (14,054)
Deferred costs and other assets(22,181) (23,846) (14,063)(23,087) (21,209) (14,397)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, deferred revenues and other liabilities(32,058) (36,897) 1,257
4,421
 (4,058) (41,249)
Net cash provided by operating activities289,798
 310,763
 277,640
287,245
 324,631
 288,987
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:          
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
 (963,144) (168,600)(80,108) 
 
Capital expenditures, net(173,593) (160,512) (80,292)(153,850) (147,329) (173,593)
Restricted cash reserves for future capital expenditures, net(1,989) (2,845) (9,161)
Net proceeds from disposition of properties22,653
 431,823
 24,976
Net proceeds from disposition of interests in properties and outparcels39,212
 218,801
 22,653
Investments in unconsolidated entities(11,631) (15,401) (2,492)(20,178) (50,911) (11,631)
Distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities38,618
 4,597
 1,137
35,096
 73,289
 38,086
Net cash used in investing activities(125,942) (705,482) (234,432)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(179,828) 93,850
 (124,485)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:          
Distributions to Simon Property Group, Inc., net
 
 (1,060,187)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders in properties
 (8) (860)(66) (114) 
Redemption of limited partner units/preferred shares(6) (118,048) (31)(28) (251) (6)
Change in lender-required restricted cash reserves on mortgage loans(3,021) (898) 
Net proceeds from issuance of common shares, including common stock plans512
 1,899
 

 13
 512
Distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interest(24) 
 

 
 (24)
Purchase of redeemable noncontrolling interest(339) 
 

 (6,830) (339)
Distributions on common and preferred shares/units(235,092) (228,706) (94,110)(236,821) (236,152) (235,092)
Proceeds from issuance of debt, net of transaction costs206,740
 2,826,258
 1,452,385
708,563
 1,293,322
 206,740
Repayments of debt(189,526) (2,078,293) (257,494)(588,182) (1,486,781) (202,939)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(220,756) 402,204
 39,703
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS(56,900) 7,485
 82,911
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year116,253
 108,768
 25,857
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year$59,353
 $116,253
 $108,768
Net cash used in financing activities(116,534) (436,793) (231,148)
DECREASE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH(9,117) (18,312) (66,646)
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH, beginning of year70,201
 88,513
 155,159
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH, end of year$61,084
 $70,201
 $88,513

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


Washington Prime Group Inc.
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Equity
(dollars in thousands, except per share/unit amounts)
  Preferred Series G Preferred Series H Preferred Series I Common Stock Capital in Excess of Par Value SPG Equity Accumulated Earnings (Deficit) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Total Stockholders' Equity Non-Controlling Interests Total Equity Redeemable Non-Controlling Interests
Balance, December 31, 2013 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $1,565,169
 $
 $
 $1,565,169
 $319,356
 $1,884,525
 $
Issuance of shares in connection with separation 
 
 
 16
 711,265
 (711,281) 
 
 
 
 
 
Issuance of limited partner units 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 22,464
 22,464
 
Redemption of limited partner units 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (31) (31) 
Noncontrolling interest in property 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1,017
 1,017
 
Equity-based compensation 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1,789
 1,789
 
Adjustments to noncontrolling interests 
 
 
 
 11,692
 
 
 
 11,692
 (11,692) 
 
Distributions to SPG, net (1) 
 
 
 
 
 (878,209) 
 
 (878,209) (181,978) (1,060,187) 
Distributions on common shares/units ($0.50 per common share/unit) 
 
 
 
 
 
 (77,594) 
 (77,594) (16,516) (94,110) 
Purchase of noncontrolling interest 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (845) (845) 
Other 
 
 
 
 (2,036) 
 
 
 (2,036) 
 (2,036) 
Net income 
 
 
 
 
 24,321
 145,708
 
 170,029
 35,426
 205,455
 
Balance, December 31, 2014 
 
 
 16
 720,921
 
 68,114
 
 789,051
 168,990
 958,041
 
Issuance of shares and units in connection with the Merger 117,384
 104,251
 98,325
 3
 535,029
 
 
 
 854,992
 29,482
 884,474
 6,148
Exercise of stock options 
 
 
 
 2,311
 
 
 
 2,311
 
 2,311
 
Redemption of limited partner units 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (664) (664) 
Noncontrolling interest in property 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (8) (8) 
Equity-based compensation 
 
 
 
 4,772
 
 
 
 4,772
 9,354
 14,126
 
Adjustments to noncontrolling interests 
 
 
 
 (37,107) 
 
 
 (37,107) 37,107
 
 
Distributions on common shares/units ($1.00 per common share/unit) 
 
 
 
 
 
 (181,071) 
 (181,071) (34,165) (215,236) 
Distributions declared on preferred shares 
 
 
 
 
 
 (15,989) 
 (15,989) 
 (15,989) 
Redemption of preferred shares (117,384) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (117,384) 
 (117,384) 
Other comprehensive income 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1,716
 1,716
 321
 2,037
 
Net loss, excluding $229 of distributions to preferred unitholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 (85,297) 
 (85,297) (19,038) (104,335) (16)
Balance, December 31, 2015 
 104,251
 98,325
 19
 1,225,926
 
 (214,243) 1,716
 1,215,994
 191,379
 1,407,373
 6,132
  Preferred Series H Preferred Series I Common Stock Capital in Excess of Par Value Accumulated Earnings (Deficit) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Total Stockholders' Equity Non-Controlling Interests Total Equity Redeemable Non-Controlling Interests
Balance, December 31, 2015 $104,251
 $98,325
 $19
 $1,225,926
 $(214,243) $1,716
 $1,215,994
 $191,379
 $1,407,373
 $6,132
Exercise of stock options 
 
 
 512
 
 
 512
 
 512
 
Redemption of limited partner units 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (6) (6) 
Other 
 
 
 151
 
 
 151
 
 151
 (925)
Adjustment of redemption value for redeemable noncontrolling interest 
 
 
 (5,464) 
 
 (5,464) 
 (5,464) 5,464
Equity-based compensation 
 
 
 9,506
 
 
 9,506
 4,603
 14,109
 
Adjustments to noncontrolling interests 
 
 
 2,007
 
 
 2,007
 (2,007) 
 
Distributions on common shares/units ($1.00 per common share/unit) 
 
 
 
 (185,562) 
 (185,562) (35,258) (220,820) 
Distributions declared on preferred shares 
 
 
 
 (14,032) 
 (14,032) 
 (14,032) 
Other comprehensive income 
 
 
 
 
 3,200
 3,200
 601
 3,801
 
Net income (loss), excluding $240 of distributions to preferred unitholders 
 
 
 
 67,131
 
 67,131
 10,056
 77,187
 (11)
Balance, December 31, 2016 104,251
 98,325
 19
 1,232,638
 (346,706) 4,916
 1,093,443
 169,368
 1,262,811
 10,660
Exercise of stock options 
 
 
 13
 
 
 13
 
 13
 
Redemption of limited partner units 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (251) (251) 
Exchange of limited partner units 
 
 
 2,463
 
 
 2,463
 (2,463) 
 
Other 
 
 
 (146) 
 
 (146) 
 (146) 
Equity-based compensation 
 
 
 5,280
 
 
 5,280
 1,122
 6,402
 
Adjustments to noncontrolling interests 
 
 
 (330) 
 
 (330) 330
 
 
Purchase of redeemable noncontrolling interest 
 
 
 565
 
 
 565
 
 565
 (7,395)
Distributions on common shares/units ($1.00 per common share/unit) 
 
 
 
 (186,919) 
 (186,919) (35,075) (221,994) 
Distributions declared on preferred shares 
 
 
 
 (14,032) 
 (14,032) 
 (14,032) 
Other comprehensive income 
 
 
 
 
 2,004
 2,004
 397
 2,401
 
Net income, excluding $240 of distributions to preferred unitholders 
 
 
 
 197,063
 
 197,063
 34,290
 231,353
 
Balance, December 31, 2017 104,251
 98,325
 19
 1,240,483
 (350,594)
6,920
 1,099,404
 167,718
 1,267,122
 3,265

(1)Amount includes approximately $1.0 billion of proceeds on new indebtedness retained by SPG L.P. as part of the separation.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.







Washington Prime Group Inc.
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Equity
(dollars in thousands, except per share/unit amounts)
 Preferred Series G Preferred Series H Preferred Series I Common Stock Capital in Excess of Par Value SPG Equity Accumulated Earnings (Deficit) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Total Stockholders' Equity Non-Controlling Interests Total Equity Redeemable Non-Controlling Interests Preferred Series H Preferred Series I Common Stock Capital in Excess of Par Value Accumulated Earnings (Deficit) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Total Stockholders' Equity Non-Controlling Interests Total Equity Redeemable Non-Controlling Interests
Exercise of stock options 
 
 
 
 512
 
 
 
 512
 
 512
 
Cumulative effect of accounting standards 
 
 
 (389) 1,890
 584
 2,085
 389
 2,474
 
Redemption of limited partner units 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (6) (6) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (28) (28) 
Other 
 
 
 
 151
 
 
 
 151
 
 151
 (925) 
 
 
 (103) 
 
 (103) 
 (103) 
Adjustment of redemption value for redeemable noncontrolling interest 
 
 
 
 (5,464) 
 
 
 (5,464) 
 (5,464) 5,464
Equity-based compensation 
 
 
 
 9,506
 
 
 
 9,506
 4,603
 14,109
 
 
 
 
 7,480
 
 
 7,480
 842
 8,322
 
Adjustments to noncontrolling interests 
 
 
 
 2,007
 
 
 
 2,007
 (2,007) 
 
 
 
 
 168
 
 
 168
 (168) 
 
Distributions on common shares/units ($1.00 per common share/unit) 
 
 
 
 
 
 (185,562) 
 (185,562) (35,258) (220,820) 
 
 
 
 
 (187,792) 
 (187,792) (34,823) (222,615) 
Distributions declared on preferred shares 
 
 
 
 
 
 (14,032) 
 (14,032) 
 (14,032) 
 
 
 
 
 (14,032) 
 (14,032) 
 (14,032) 
Other comprehensive income 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 3,200
 3,200
 601
 3,801
 
Net income (loss), excluding $240 of distributions to preferred unitholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 67,131
 
 67,131
 10,056
 77,187
 (11)
Balance, December 31, 2016 $
 $104,251
 $98,325
 $19
 $1,232,638
 $

$(346,706)
$4,916
 $1,093,443
 $169,368
 $1,262,811
 $10,660
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (1,104) (1,104) (180) (1,284) 
Net income, excluding $240 of distributions to preferred unitholders 
 
 
 
 93,604
 
 93,604
 14,811
 108,415
 
Balance, December 31, 2018 $104,251
 $98,325
 $19
 $1,247,639
 $(456,924)
$6,400
 $999,710
 $148,561
 $1,148,271
 $3,265

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Partners of Washington Prime Group L.P.:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Washington Prime Group L.P. (the Partnership) as of December 31, 20162018 and 2015, and2017, the related consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income, (loss), equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. Our audit also included2018, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index to Financial Statements on Page F-1. TheseF-1 (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements and schedule arepresent fairly, in all material respects, the responsibilityfinancial position of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statementsPartnership at December 31, 2018 and schedule based on our audits.2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We conducted our auditsalso have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). (PCAOB), the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control- Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework), and our report dated February 21, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Partnership’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesmisstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An auditOur audits also includes assessingincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Washington Prime Group, L.P. at December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the consolidated and combined results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Washington Prime Group, L.P.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework), and our report dated February 24, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/Ernst & Young LLP

We have served as the Partnership’s auditor since 2015.
Indianapolis, Indiana
February 24, 201721, 2019



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Partners of Washington Prime Group, L.P.:
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Washington Prime Group, L.P.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Control- Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Washington Prime Group, L.P.’s (the Partnership) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the 2018 consolidated financial statements of the Partnership and our report dated February 21, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Partnership’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Washington Prime Group, L.P. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Washington Prime Group, L.P. as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016 of Washington Prime Group, L.P., and our report dated February 24, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
February 24, 201721, 2019


Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(dollars in thousands, except unit amounts)

 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
ASSETS:        
Investment properties at cost $6,294,628
 $6,656,200
 $5,914,705
 $5,807,760
Less: accumulated depreciation 2,122,572
 2,225,750
 2,283,764
 2,139,620
 4,172,056
 4,430,450
 3,630,941
 3,668,140
Cash and cash equivalents 59,353
 116,253
 42,542
 52,019
Tenant receivables and accrued revenue, net 99,967
 91,603
 85,463
 90,314
Real estate assets held-for-sale 50,642
 30,000
Investment in and advances to unconsolidated entities, at equity 458,892
 488,071
 433,207
 451,839
Deferred costs and other assets 266,556
 303,232
 169,135
 189,095
Total assets $5,107,466
 $5,459,609
 $4,361,288
 $4,451,407
LIABILITIES:        
Mortgage notes payable $1,618,080
 $1,793,439
 $983,269
 $1,157,082
Notes payable 247,637
 246,728
 982,697
 979,372
Unsecured term loans 1,334,522
 1,332,812
 685,509
 606,695
Revolving credit facility 306,165
 275,622
 286,002
 154,460
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, and deferred revenues 309,178
 379,112
 253,862
 264,998
Distributions payable 2,992
 2,992
 2,992
 2,992
Cash distributions and losses in unconsolidated entities, at equity 15,421
 15,399
 15,421
 15,421
Total liabilities 3,833,995
 4,046,104
 3,209,752
 3,181,020
Redeemable noncontrolling interests 10,660
 6,132
 3,265
 3,265
EQUITY:        
Partners' Equity:        
General partner        
Preferred equity, 7,800,000 units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively 202,576
 202,576
Common equity, 185,427,411 and 185,304,555 units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively 890,867
 1,013,418
Preferred equity, 7,800,000 units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 202,576
 202,576
Common equity, 186,074,461 and 185,791,421 units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively 797,134
 896,828
Total general partners' equity 1,093,443
 1,215,994
 999,710
 1,099,404
Limited partners, 35,127,735 and 34,807,051 units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively 168,264
 190,297
Limited partners, 34,755,660 and 34,760,026 units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively 147,493
 166,660
Total partners' equity 1,261,707
 1,406,291
 1,147,203
 1,266,064
Noncontrolling interests 1,104
 1,082
 1,068
 1,058
Total equity 1,262,811
 1,407,373
 1,148,271
 1,267,122
Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interests and equity $5,107,466
 $5,459,609
 $4,361,288
 $4,451,407

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts)
For the Year Ended December 31,For the Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
REVENUE:          
Minimum rent$572,781
 $623,113
 $443,613
$492,169
 $516,386
 $572,781
Overage rent12,882
 14,040
 9,357
9,313
 9,115
 12,882
Tenant reimbursements236,510
 259,774
 194,884
191,319
 208,290
 236,510
Other income21,302
 24,429
 13,124
30,504
 24,331
 21,302
Total revenues843,475
 921,356
 660,978
723,305
 758,122
 843,475
EXPENSES:          
Property operating166,690
 197,287
 136,538
148,433
 146,529
 166,690
Depreciation and amortization281,150
 332,469
 197,890
257,796
 258,740
 281,150
Real estate taxes102,638
 109,548
 77,427
86,665
 89,617
 102,638
Advertising and promotion10,375
 11,635
 8,284
9,070
 9,107
 10,375
Provision for credit losses4,508
 2,022
 2,332
5,826
 5,068
 4,508
General and administrative37,317
 48,154
 10,788
39,090
 34,892
 37,317
Spin-off costs
 
 38,907
Merger, restructuring and transaction costs29,607
 31,653
 8,839

 
 29,607
Ground rent4,318
 6,874
 2,836
789
 2,438
 4,318
Impairment loss21,879
 147,979
 

 66,925
 21,879
Total operating expenses658,482
 887,621
 483,841
547,669
 613,316
 658,482
OPERATING INCOME184,993
 33,735
 177,137


 

 

Interest expense, net(136,225) (139,923) (82,428)(141,987) (126,541) (136,225)
Gain (loss) on disposition of interests in properties, net24,602
 124,771
 (1,987)
Gain on extinguishment of debt, net34,612
 
 
51,395
 90,579
 34,612
Income and other taxes(2,232) (849) (1,215)(1,532) (3,417) (2,232)
(Loss) income from unconsolidated entities(1,745) (1,247) 973
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE (LOSS) GAIN ON ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION OF INTERESTS IN PROPERTIES, NET79,403
 (108,284) 94,467
(Loss) gain upon acquisition of controlling interests and on sale of interests in properties, net(1,987) 4,162
 110,988
NET INCOME (LOSS)77,416
 (104,122) 205,455
Income (loss) from unconsolidated entities541
 1,395
 (1,745)
NET INCOME108,655
 231,593
 77,416
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests11
 286
 
76
 68
 11
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO UNITHOLDERS77,405
 (104,408) 205,455
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO UNITHOLDERS108,579
 231,525
 77,405
Less: Preferred unit distributions(14,272) (16,218) 
(14,272) (14,272) (14,272)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON UNITHOLDERS$63,133
 $(120,626) $205,455
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON UNITHOLDERS$94,307
 $217,253
 $63,133
          
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON UNITHOLDERS:     
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON UNITHOLDERS:     
General partner$53,099
 $(101,515) $170,029
$79,572
 $183,031
 $53,099
Limited partners10,034
 (19,111) 35,426
14,735
 34,222
 10,034
Net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders$63,133
 $(120,626) $205,455
Net income attributable to common unitholders$94,307
 $217,253
 $63,133
          
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON UNIT, BASIC AND DILUTED$0.29
 $(0.55) $1.10
EARNINGS PER COMMON UNIT, BASIC AND DILUTED$0.42
 $0.98
 $0.29
          
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS):     
Net income (loss)$77,416
 $(104,122) $205,455
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:     
Net income$108,655
 $231,593
 $77,416
Unrealized (loss) income on interest rate derivative instruments3,801
 2,037
 
(1,284) 2,401
 3,801
Comprehensive income (loss)81,217
 (102,085) 205,455
Comprehensive income107,371
 233,994
 81,217
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests11
 286
 
76
 68
 11
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to unitholders$81,206
 $(102,371) $205,455
Comprehensive income attributable to unitholders$107,295
 $233,926
 $81,206

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows
(dollars in thousands)
For the Year Ended December 31,For the Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:          
Net income (loss)$77,416
 $(104,122) $205,455
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Net income$108,655
 $231,593
 $77,416
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization, including fair value rent, fair value debt, deferred financing costs and equity-based compensation285,632
 329,895
 198,934
259,022
 259,167
 284,960
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt, net(34,612) 
 2,894
Loss (gain) on disposition of interests in properties, net1,987
 (4,162) (110,988)
Gain on extinguishment of debt, net(51,395) (90,579) (34,612)
(Gain) loss on disposition of interests in properties and outparcels, net(24,602) (125,063) 1,987
Impairment loss21,879
 147,979
 

 66,925
 21,879
Provision for credit losses4,508
 2,022
 2,332
5,826
 5,068
 4,508
Loss (income) from unconsolidated entities1,745
 1,247
 (973)
(Income) loss from unconsolidated entities(541) (1,395) 1,745
Distributions of income from unconsolidated entities272
 223
 1,004
8,619
 1,873
 804
Changes in assets and liabilities:          
Tenant receivables and accrued revenue, net(14,790) (1,576) (8,212)327
 2,309
 (14,054)
Deferred costs and other assets(22,181) (23,846) (14,063)(23,087) (21,209) (14,397)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, deferred revenues and other liabilities(32,058) (36,897) 1,257
4,421
 (4,058) (41,249)
Net cash provided by operating activities289,798
 310,763
 277,640
287,245
 324,631
 288,987
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:          
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
 (963,144) (168,600)(80,108) 
 
Capital expenditures, net(173,593) (160,512) (80,292)(153,850) (147,329) (173,593)
Restricted cash reserves for future capital expenditures, net(1,989) (2,845) (9,161)
Net proceeds from disposition of properties22,653
 431,823
 24,976
Net proceeds from disposition of interests in properties and outparcels39,212
 218,801
 22,653
Investments in unconsolidated entities(11,631) (15,401) (2,492)(20,178) (50,911) (11,631)
Distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities38,618
 4,597
 1,137
35,096
 73,289
 38,086
Net cash used in investing activities(125,942) (705,482) (234,432)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(179,828) 93,850
 (124,485)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:          
Distributions to unitholders, net(235,092) (228,706) (1,154,297)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders in properties
 (8) (860)(66) (114) 
Redemption of limited partner/preferred units(6) (118,048) (31)(28) (251) (6)
Change in lender-required restricted cash reserves on mortgage loans(3,021) (898) 
Net proceeds from issuance of common units, including equity-based compensation plans512
 1,899
 

 13
 512
Distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interest(24) 
 

 
 (24)
Purchase of redeemable noncontrolling interest(339) 
 

 (6,830) (339)
Distributions to unitholders, net(236,821) (236,152) (235,092)
Proceeds from issuance of debt, net of transaction costs206,740
 2,826,258
 1,452,385
708,563
 1,293,322
 206,740
Repayments of debt(189,526) (2,078,293) (257,494)(588,182) (1,486,781) (202,939)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(220,756) 402,204
 39,703
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS(56,900) 7,485
 82,911
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year116,253
 108,768
 25,857
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year$59,353
 $116,253
 $108,768
Net cash used in financing activities(116,534) (436,793) (231,148)
DECREASE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH(9,117) (18,312) (66,646)
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH, beginning of year70,201
 88,513
 155,159
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH, end of year$61,084
 $70,201
 $88,513

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Equity
(dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts)

 General Partner           General Partner          
 Preferred Common Total Limited Partners Total
Partners'
Equity
 Non-
Controlling
Interests
 Total
Equity
 Redeemable Non-Controlling Interests Preferred Common Total Limited Partners Total
Partners'
Equity
 Non-
Controlling
Interests
 Total
Equity
 Redeemable Non-Controlling Interests
Balance, December 31, 2013 $
 $1,565,169
 $1,565,169
 $318,511
 $1,883,680
 $845
 $1,884,525
 $
Issuance of limited partner units 
 
 
 22,464
 22,464
 
 22,464
 
Redemption of limited partner units 
 
 
 (31) (31) 
 (31) 
Noncontrolling interest in property 
 
 
 
 
 1,017
 1,017
 
Equity-based compensation 
 
 
 1,789
 1,789
 
 1,789
 
Adjustments to limited partners' interests 
 11,692
 11,692
 (11,692) 
 
 
 
Distributions to common unitholders, net (1) 
 (955,803) (955,803) (198,494) (1,154,297) 
 (1,154,297) 
Purchase of noncontrolling interest 
 
 
 
 
 (845) (845) 
Other 
 (2,036) (2,036) 
 (2,036) 
 (2,036) 
Net income 
 170,029
 170,029
 35,426
 205,455
 
 205,455
 
Balance, December 31, 2014 
 789,051
 789,051
 167,973
 957,024
 1,017
 958,041
 
Issuance of units in connection with the Merger 319,960
 535,032
 854,992
 29,482
 884,474
 
 884,474
 6,148
Balance, December 31, 2015 $202,576
 $1,013,418
 $1,215,994
 $190,297
 $1,406,291
 $1,082
 $1,407,373
 $6,132
Exercise of stock options 
 2,311
 2,311
 
 2,311
 
 2,311
 
 
 512
 512
 
 512
 
 512
 
Redemption of limited partner units 
 
 
 (664) (664) 
 (664) 
 
 
 
 (6) (6) 
 (6) 
Noncontrolling interest in property 
 
 
 
 
 (8) (8) 
Other 
 151
 151
 
 151
 
 151
 (925)
Adjustment of redemption value for redeemable noncontrolling interest 
 (5,464) (5,464) 
 (5,464) 
 (5,464) 5,464
Equity-based compensation 
 4,772
 4,772
 9,354
 14,126
 
 14,126
 
 
 9,506
 9,506
 4,603
 14,109
 
 14,109
 
Adjustments to limited partners' interests 
 (37,107) (37,107) 37,107
 
 
 
 
 
 2,007
 2,007
 (2,007) 
 
 
 
Distributions to common unitholders, net 
 (181,071) (181,071) (34,165) (215,236) 
 (215,236) 
 
 (185,562) (185,562) (35,258) (220,820) 
 (220,820) 
Distributions declared on preferred units (15,989) 
 (15,989) 
 (15,989) 
 (15,989) (229) (14,032) 
 (14,032) 
 (14,032) 
 (14,032) (240)
Redemption of preferred units (117,384) 
 (117,384) 
 (117,384) 
 (117,384) 
Other comprehensive income 
 1,716
 1,716
 321
 2,037
 
 2,037
 
 
 3,200
 3,200
 601
 3,801
 
 3,801
 
Net income (loss) 15,989
 (101,286) (85,297) (19,111) (104,408) 73
 (104,335) 213
Balance, December 31, 2015 202,576
 1,013,418
 1,215,994
 190,297
 1,406,291
 1,082
 1,407,373
 6,132
Net income 14,032
 53,099
 67,131
 10,034
 77,165
 22
 77,187
 229
Balance, December 31, 2016 202,576
 890,867
 1,093,443
 168,264
 1,261,707
 1,104
 1,262,811
 10,660
Exercise of stock options 
 13
 13
 
 13
 
 13
 
Redemption of limited partner units 
 
 
 (251) (251) 
 (251) 
Exchange of limited partner units 
 2,463
 2,463
 (2,463) 
 
 
 
Other 
 (146) (146) 
 (146) 
 (146) 
Equity-based compensation 
 5,280
 5,280
 1,122
 6,402
 
 6,402
 
Adjustments to noncontrolling interests 
 (330) (330) 330
 
 
 
 
Purchase of redeemable noncontrolling interest 
 565
 565
 
 565
 
 565
 (7,395)
Distributions to common unitholders, net 
 (186,919) (186,919) (34,961) (221,880) (114) (221,994) 
Distributions declared on preferred units (14,032) 
 (14,032) 
 (14,032) 
 (14,032) (240)
Other comprehensive income 
 2,004
 2,004
 397
 2,401
 
 2,401
 
Net income 14,032
 183,031
 197,063
 34,222
 231,285
 68
 231,353
 240
Balance, December 31, 2017 202,576
 896,828
 1,099,404
 166,660
 1,266,064
 1,058
 1,267,122
 3,265

(1)Amount includes approximately $1.0 billion of proceeds on new indebtedness retained by SPG L.P. as part of the separation.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.






Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Equity
(dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts)

 General Partner           General Partner          
 Preferred Common Total Limited Partners Total
Partners'
Equity
 Non-
Controlling
Interests
 Total
Equity
 Redeemable Non-Controlling Interests Preferred Common Total Limited Partners Total
Partners'
Equity
 Non-
Controlling
Interests
 Total
Equity
 Redeemable Non-Controlling Interests
Exercise of stock options 
 512
 512
 
 512
 
 512
 
Cumulative effect of accounting standards 
 2,085
 2,085
 389
 2,474
 
 2,474
 
Redemption of limited partner units 
 
 
 (6) (6) 
 (6) 
 
 
 
 (28) (28) 
 (28) 
Other 
 151
 151
 
 151
 
 151
 (925) 
 (103) (103) 
 (103) 
 (103) 
Adjustment of redemption value for redeemable noncontrolling interest 
 (5,464) (5,464) 
 (5,464) 
 (5,464) 5,464
Equity-based compensation 
 9,506
 9,506
 4,603
 14,109
 
 14,109
 
 
 7,480
 7,480
 842
 8,322
 
 8,322
 
Adjustments to limited partners' interests 
 2,007
 2,007
 (2,007) 
 
 
 
Adjustments to noncontrolling interests 
 168
 168
 (168) 
 
 
 
Distributions to common unitholders, net 
 (185,562) (185,562) (35,258) (220,820) 
 (220,820) 
 
 (187,792) (187,792) (34,757) (222,549) (66) (222,615) 
Distributions declared on preferred units (14,032) 
 (14,032) 
 (14,032) 
 (14,032) (240) (14,032) 
 (14,032) 
 (14,032) 
 (14,032) (240)
Other comprehensive income 
 3,200
 3,200
 601
 3,801
 
 3,801
 
Other comprehensive loss 
 (1,104) (1,104) (180) (1,284) 
 (1,284) 
Net income 14,032
 53,099
 67,131
 10,034
 77,165
 22
 77,187
 229
 14,032
 79,572
 93,604
 14,735
 108,339
 76
 108,415
 240
Balance, December 31, 2016 $202,576
 $890,867
 $1,093,443
 $168,264
 $1,261,707
 $1,104
 $1,262,811
 $10,660
Balance, December 31, 2018 $202,576
 $797,134
 $999,710
 $147,493
 $1,147,203
 $1,068
 $1,148,271
 $3,265


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit and per share amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)



1.    Organization
1.Organization
Washington Prime Group Inc. (formerly named WP Glimcher Inc.) ("WPG Inc.") is an Indiana corporation that operates as a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. REITsamended (the "Code"). WPG Inc. will generally not be liablequalify as a REIT for U.S. federal corporate income taxestax purposes as long as they continueit continues to distribute not less than 100%at least 90% of theirits REIT taxable income, exclusive of net capital gains, and satisfy certain other requirements. WPG Inc. will generally be allowed a deduction against its U.S. federal income tax liability for dividends paid by it to REIT shareholders, thereby reducing or eliminating any corporate level taxation to WPG Inc. Washington Prime Group, L.P. ("WPG L.P.") is WPG Inc.'s majority-owned limited partnership subsidiary that owns, develops and manages, through its affiliates, all of WPG Inc.'s real estate properties and other assets. WPG Inc. is the sole general partner of WPG L.P. On May 28, 2014, (the "Separation Date"), WPG (defined below) separated from Simon Property Group Inc. ("SPG") through the distribution of 100% of the outstanding units of WPG L.P. to the owners of SPGSimon Property Group L.P. and 100% of the outstanding shares of WPG Inc. to the SPG common shareholders in a tax-free distribution. Prior to the separation, WPG Inc. and WPG L.P. were wholly owned subsidiaries of SPG and its subsidiariessubsidiaries. On January 15, 2015, the Company acquired Glimcher Realty Trust ("SPG Businesses"GRT"). in a stock and cash transaction valued at approximately $4.2 billion, including the assumption of debt. As of December 31, 2016,2018, our assets consisted of material interests in 114108 shopping centers in the United States, consisting of community centersopen air properties and enclosed retail properties, comprised of approximately 6358 million square feet (unaudited) of managed gross leasable area.area ("GLA").
Unless the context otherwise requires, references to "WPG," the "Company," "we," "us," and"us" or "our" refer to WPG Inc., WPG L.P. and entities in which WPG Inc. or WPG L.P. (or anany affiliate) has a material ownership or financial interest, on a consolidated basis, after giving effect to the transfer of assets and liabilities from SPG as well as to the SPG Businesses prior to the date of the completion of the separation. Before the completion of the separation, SPG Businesses were operated as subsidiaries of SPG, which operates as a REIT.
At the time of the separation and distribution, WPG Inc. owned a percentage of the outstanding units of partnership interest, or units, of WPG L.P. that was approximately equal to the percentage of outstanding units of partnership interest that SPG owned of SPG L.P., with the remaining units of WPG L.P. being owned by the limited partners who were also limited partners of SPG L.P. as of the May 16, 2014 record date. The units in WPG L.P. held by limited partners are exchangeable, at their election, for WPG Inc. common shares on a one-for-one basis or cash, as determined by WPG Inc.
Prior to the separation, WPG entered into agreements with SPG under which SPG provided various services to us, including accounting, asset management, development, human resources, information technology, leasing, legal, marketing, public reporting and tax. The charges for the services are based on an hourly or per transaction fee arrangement and pass-through of out-of-pocket costs for which the underlying agreements expired effective May 31, 2016 (see Note 11 - "Related Party Transactions").
At the time of the separation, our assets consisted of interests in 98 shopping centers. In addition to the above properties, the combined historical financial statements include interests in one shopping center which was sold by a joint venture on February 28, 2014.basis.
We derive our revenues primarily from retail tenant leases, including fixed minimum rent leases, overage and percentage rent leases based on tenants' sales volumes, offering property operating services to our tenants and others, including energy, waste handling and facility services, and reimbursements from tenants for certain recoverable expenditures such as property operating, real estate taxes, repair and maintenance, and advertising and promotional expenditures.expenses.
We seek to enhance the performance of our properties and increase our revenues by, among other things, securing leases of anchor and inline tenant spaces, re-developing or renovating existing properties to increase the leasable square footage, and increasing the productivity of occupied locations through aesthetic upgrades, re-merchandising and/or changes to the retail use of the space.
The MergerLeadership Changes and Severance Impacting Financial Results
2018 Activity
On January 15, 2015,May 7, 2018, the Company's Executive Vice President, Property Management was terminated without cause from his position and received severance payments and other benefits pursuant to the terms and conditions of his employment agreement. In addition, the Company acquired Glimcher Realty Trust ("GRT"), pursuant to a definitive agreement and plan of merger with GRT and certain affiliated parties of each dated September 16, 2014, (the "Merger Agreement"), in a stock and cash transaction valued at approximately $4.2 billion, including the assumption of debt (the "Merger"). Prior to the Merger, GRT was a Maryland REIT engagedterminated without cause additional non-executive personnel in the ownership, management, acquisition and development of retail properties, including mixed-use, open-air and enclosed regional retail properties as well as outlet centers. As of December 31, 2014, GRT owned material interests in and managed 25 properties with total gross leasable area of approximately 17.2 million square feet (unaudited), including the two properties sold to SPG concurrent with the Merger noted below. Prior to the Merger, GRT's common shares were listed on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "GRT."
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


In the Merger, GRT's common shareholders received, for each GRT common share, $14.02 consisting of $10.40 in cash and 0.1989 of a share of WPG Inc.'s common stock valued at $3.62 per GRT common share, based on the closing price of WPG Inc.'s common stock on the Merger closing date. Approximately 29.9 million shares of WPG Inc.'s common stock were issued to GRT shareholders in the Merger, and WPG L.P. issued to WPG Inc. a like number of common units as consideration for the common shares issued. Additionally, included in the consideration were operating partnership units held by limited partners and preferred stock as noted below.Property Management department. In connection with the closingand as part of the Merger, an indirect subsidiary of WPG L.P. was merged into GRT's operating partnership. In the Merger, we acquired 23 shopping centers comprised of approximately 15.8 million square feet (unaudited) of gross leasable areaaforementioned management and assumed additional mortgages on 14 properties with a fair value of approximately $1.4 billion. Prior to the Merger,personnel changes, the Company was comprisedrecorded aggregate severance charges of approximately 53$2.0 million, square feet (unaudited) of gross leasable area. The combined company was renamed WP Glimcher Inc. in May 2015 upon receiving shareholder approval.
In the Merger, the preferred stock of GRT was converted into preferred stock of WPG Inc., and WPG L.P. issued to WPG Inc. preferred units as consideration for the preferred shares issued. Additionally, each outstanding unit of GRT's operating partnership held by limited partners was converted into 0.7431 of a unit of WPG L.P. Further, each outstanding stock option in respect of GRT common stock was converted into a WPG Inc. option, and certain other GRT equity awards were assumed by WPG Inc. and converted into equity awards in respect of WPG Inc.'s common shares.
Concurrent with the closing of the Merger, GRT completed a transaction with SPG under which affiliates of SPG acquired Jersey Gardens in Elizabeth, New Jersey, and University Park Village in Fort Worth, Texas, properties previously owned by affiliates of GRT, for an aggregate purchase price of $1.09 billion, including SPG's assumption of approximately $405.0$0.5 million of associated mortgage indebtedness (the "Property Sale").
The cash portionnon-cash stock compensation in the form of the Merger consideration was funded by the Property Sale and draws under the Bridge Loan (see Note 6 - "Indebtedness"). During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred $31.7 million and $8.8 millionaccelerated vesting of equity incentive awards, which costs related to the Merger, respectively, which are included in merger, restructuringgeneral and transaction costsadministrative expense in the accompanying consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Leadership Transition and Corporate Name Change
2015 Activity
On June 1, 2015, the Company announced a management transition plan through which Mr. Mark S. Ordan, the then Executive Chairman of the WPG Inc. Board of Directors (the "Board"), transitioned to serve as an active non-executive Chairman of the Board and provide consulting services to the Company under a Transition and Consulting Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2016 (see "2016 Activity" below for subsequent matters related to Mr. Ordan).  Additionally, the Company reduced staff formerly located in its Bethesda, Maryland-based transition operations group led by Mr. C. Marc Richards, the Company’s then Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer, who departed the Company on January 15, 2016. Other senior executives from the Bethesda office who departed the Company at the end of 2015 were Mr. Michael J. Gaffney, then Executive Vice President, Head of Capital Markets (who served as a consultant to the Company through March 31, 2016), and Ms. Farinaz S. Tehrani, then Executive Vice President, Legal and Compliance. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company incurred $8.6 million of related severance costs, consisting of $4.6 million in cash severance and approximately $4.0 million in non-cash stock compensation charges, which are included in the total merger, restructuring and transactions costs disclosed above. Finally, in addition to our headquarters in Columbus, Ohio, the Company opened a new leasing, management and operations office in Indianapolis, Indiana, in December 2015.2018.
2016 Activity
On June 20, 2016, (the “Executive Separation Date”), the Company announced the following leadership changes effective as of the Executive Separation Date:changes: (1) the resignation of Mr. Michael P. Glimcher as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of the Board; (2) the appointment of Mr. Louis G. Conforti, a current Board member, as Interim Chief Executive Officer; (3) the resignation of Mr. Mark S. Ordan as non-executive Chairman of the Board; and (4) the resignation of Mr. Niles C. Overly from the Board. Additionally, on June 16,In July of 2016, the Board appointed Mr. Robert P. Demchak as Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary of the Company. Also, on the Executive Separation Date, the Board appointed Mr. Robert J. Laikin, a current Board member, as non-executive Chairman of the Board and also appointed Mr. John F. Levy and Mr. John J. Dillon III as independent directors. On August 30, 2016, the Board appointed Ms. Sheryl G. von Blucher as an independent director upon the retirement of Mr. Marvin L. White. The Board currently consists of five independent members: Messrs. Laikin, Dillon, Levy, and Mmes. von Blucher and Jacqueline R. Soffer as well as Messrs. Conforti and Ordan who are not independent. On July 14, 2016, the Company’s Executive Vice President, Director of Leasing and Senior Vice President of Human Resources were terminated without cause from their positions and received severance payments and other benefits pursuant to the terms and
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


conditions of their respective Severance Benefits Agreements. In addition to these July 14, 2016 executive terminations, the Company terminated some additional executive and non-executive personnel as part of an effort to reduce overhead costs. On October 6, 2016, the Company announced that Mr. Conforti would serve as the Company's Chief Executive Officer for a term ending December 31, 2019, subject to early termination clauses and automatic renewals pursuant to his employment agreement.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


In connection with and as part of the aforementioned management changes, the Company recorded aggregate chargesa charge of $29.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, of which $25.5 million related to severance and restructuring-related costs, including $9.5 million of non-cash stock compensation for accelerated vesting of equity incentive awards, and $4.1 million related to fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Company's investigation of various strategic alternatives, which costs are included in merger, restructuring and transaction costs in the accompanying consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). During WPG Inc.'s annual meeting of shareholders on August 30, 2016, the common shareholders approved a proposal to change WPG Inc.'s name back to Washington Prime Group Inc.
Conveyance of Glimcher Domain Name and Rights to Mr. Michael P. Glimcher
In connection with the resignation of Mr. Michael P. Glimcher as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of the Board, the Company agreed to assign to Mr. Glimcher our right, title and interest to the glimcher.com internet domain name, the Glimcher logo, and irrevocably consent to Mr. Glimcher’s use of the “Glimcher” name in any future trade name or business endeavor. This agreement was effective on August 30, 2016, the date we received shareholder approval of the corporate name change from WP Glimcher Inc. to Washington Prime Group Inc. Mr. Glimcher consented to the Company’s use of the “Glimcher” name and Glimcher logo with respect to our subsidiaries and properties for a period of 12 months following the Executive Separation Date.income.
2.    Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation and Combination
2.Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated and combined financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). The consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 include the accounts of WPG Inc. and WPG L.P., as well as their majority owned and controlled subsidiaries. The accompanying consolidated and combined statements of operations include the consolidated accounts of the Company and the combined accounts of the SPG Businesses.Company. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation and combination.
Accounting for the Separation
The results presented for the year ended December 31, 2014 reflect the aggregate operations and changes in cash flows and equity of the SPG Businesses on a carve-out basis for the period from January 1, 2014 through May 27, 2014 and of the Company on a consolidated basis subsequent to May 27, 2014.
For accounting and reporting purposes, the historical financial statements of WPG have been restated to include the operating results of the SPG Businesses as if the SPG Businesses had been a part of WPG for all periods presented. Equity and income have been adjusted retroactively to reflect WPG's ownership interest and the noncontrolling interest holders' interest in the SPG Businesses as of the Separation Date as if such interests were held for all periods prior to the separation presented in the financial statements. WPG Inc.'s earnings per common share and WPG L.P.'s earnings per common unit have been presented for all historical periods as if the number of common shares and units issued in connection with the separation were outstanding during each of the periods prior to the separation presented.
For periods presented prior to the separation, our historical combined financial results reflect charges for certain SPG corporate costs and we believe such charges are reasonable; however, such results do not necessarily reflect what our expenses would have been had we been operating as a separate stand-alone public company. These charges are further discussed in Note 11 - "Related Party Transactions." Costs of the services that were charged to us were based on either actual costs incurred or a proportion of costs estimated to be applicable to us. The historical combined financial information presented may therefore not be indicative of the results of operations, financial position or cash flows that would have been obtained if we had been an independent, stand-alone public company during the periods presented prior to the separation or of our future performance as an independent, stand-alone public company. For joint venture or mortgaged properties, SPG has a standard management agreement for management, leasing and development activities provided to the properties. Management fees were based upon a percentage of revenues. For any wholly owned property that does not have a management agreement, SPG allocated the proportion of the underlying costs of management, leasing and development, in a manner that is materially consistent with the percentage of revenue-based management fees and/or upon the actual volume of leasing and development activity occurring at the property.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


In connection with the separation, we incurred $38.9 million of expenses, including investment banking, legal, accounting, tax and other professional fees, which are included in spin-off costs for the year ended December 31, 2014 in the accompanying consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).consolidation.
General
These consolidated and combined financial statements reflect the consolidation of properties that are wholly owned or properties in which we own less than a 100% interest but that we control. Control of a property is demonstrated by, among other factors, our ability to refinance debt and sell the property without the consent of any other unaffiliated partner or owner, and the inability of any other unaffiliated partner or owner to replace us.
We consolidate a variable interest entity ("VIE") when we are determined to be the primary beneficiary. Determination of the primary beneficiary of a VIE is based on whether an entity has (1) the power to direct activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Our determination of the primary beneficiary of a VIE considers all relationships between us and the VIE, including management agreements and other contractual arrangements.
Effective January 1, 2016, As of December 31, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2015-02, "Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis,"have two VIEs which changed the way reporting enterprises must evaluate the consolidationconsist of limited partnerships, variable interests and similar entities. Among other things, the changes eliminate the presumptionour interest in the voting model that a general partner controls a limited partnership. However, a general partner may consolidate a limited partnership under the variable interest model, depending on the facts and circumstances. WPG Inc. reevaluated whether to consolidate WPG L.P., now considered a VIE, under the new guidance. Based on the facts and circumstances, WPG Inc. concluded that it may continue to consolidate WPG L.P. under the variable interest model as the primary beneficiary of the limited partnership. Ultimately, the new guidance did not impact any of our previous conclusions regarding consolidation.undeveloped land, respectively.
Except as discussed above related to the classification of WPG L.P. as a VIE, thereThere have been no changes during the year ended December 31, 20162018 to any of our previous conclusions about whether an entity qualifies as a VIE or whether we are the primary beneficiary of any previously identified VIE. In connection with the Merger, the Company acquired an interest in a VIE in which we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, we have consolidated the VIE, which consists solely of undeveloped land. During the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, we did not provide financial or other support to a previously identified VIE that we were not previously contractually obligated to provide.
Investments in partnerships and joint ventures represent our noncontrolling ownership interests in properties. We account for these investments using the equity method of accounting. We initially record these investments at cost and we subsequently adjust for net equity in income or loss, which we allocate in accordance with the provisions of the applicable partnership or joint venture agreement and cash contributions and distributions, if applicable. The allocation provisions in the partnership or joint venture agreements are not always consistent with the legal ownership interests held by each general or limited partner or joint venture investee primarily due to partner preferences. We separately report investments in joint ventures for which accumulated distributions have exceeded investments in and our share of net income from the joint ventures within cash distributions and losses in partnerships and joint ventures,unconsolidated entities, at equity in the consolidated balance sheets. The net equity of certain joint ventures is less than zero because of financing or operating distributions that are usually greater than net income, as net income includes non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization, and WPG has historically committed to or intends to fund the venture.
As of December 31, 2016,2018, our assets consisted of material interests in 114108 shopping centers. The consolidated and combined financial statements as of that date reflect the consolidation of 10291 wholly owned properties and sixfour additional properties that are less than wholly owned, but which we control or for which we are the primary beneficiary. We account for our interests in the remaining six13 properties, or the joint venture properties, using the equity method of accounting, asaccounting. While we have determined that we have significant influence over their operations. We manage the day-to-day operations of the joint venture properties, butwe do not control the operations as we have determined that our partner or partners have substantive participating rights with respect to the assets and operations of these joint venture properties.
We allocate net operating results of WPG L.P. to third parties and to WPG Inc. based on the partners' respective weighted average ownership interests in WPG L.P. Net operating results of WPG L.P. attributable to third parties are reflected in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests. WPG Inc.'s weighted average ownership interest in WPG L.P. was 84.1%84.4%, 84.1%84.3% and 82.8%84.1% for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, respectively. As of December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, WPG Inc.'s ownership interest in WPG L.P. was 84.1%84.4% and, 84.2%,84.3% respectively. We adjust the noncontrolling limited partners' interests at the end of each period to reflect their interest in WPG L.P.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


3.    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
3.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of 90 days or less to be cash and cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. Cash equivalents generally consist of commercial paper, bankers' acceptances, repurchase agreements, and money market deposits or securities. Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk include our cash and cash equivalents and our tenant receivables. We place our cash and cash equivalents with institutions with high credit quality. However, at certain times, such cash and cash equivalents may be in excess of FDIC and SIPC insurance limits.
Investment Properties
We record investment properties at fair value when acquired. Investment properties include costs of acquisitions; development, predevelopment, and construction (including allocable salaries and related benefits); tenant allowances and improvements; and interest and real estate taxes incurred during construction. We capitalize improvements and replacements from repair and maintenance when the repair and maintenance extends the useful life, increases capacity, or improves the efficiency of the asset. All other repair and maintenance items are expensed as incurred. We capitalize interest on projects during periods of construction until the projects are ready for their intended purpose based on interest rates in place during the construction period. Capitalized interest for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 2015was $2,234, $1,521 and 2014 was $2,640, $1,781 and $283, respectively.
We record depreciation on buildings and improvements utilizing the straight-line method over an estimated original useful life, which is generally five to 40 years. We review depreciable lives of investment properties periodically and we make adjustments when necessary to reflect a shorter economic life. We amortize tenant allowances and tenant improvements utilizing the straight-line method over the term of the related lease or occupancy term of the tenant, if shorter. We record depreciation on equipment and fixtures utilizing the straight-line method over three to ten years.
We review investment properties for impairment on a property-by-property basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of investment properties may not be recoverable. These circumstances include, but are not limited to, declines in a property's cash flows, ending occupancy, estimated market values or our decision to dispose of a property before the end of its estimated useful life. Furthermore, this evaluation is conducted no less frequently than quarterly, irrespective of changes in circumstances. We measure any impairment of investment property when the estimated undiscounted operating income before depreciation and amortization plus its residual value is less than the carrying value of the property. To the extent impairment has occurred, we charge to expense the excess of carrying value of the property over its estimated fair value. We estimate fair value using unobservable data such as operating income, estimated capitalization rates, leasing prospects and local market information. We may decide to dispose properties that are held for use and the consideration received from these property dispositions may differ from their carrying values. We also review our investments, including investments in unconsolidated entities, if events or circumstances change indicating that the carrying amount of our investments may not be recoverable. We will record an impairment charge if we determine that a decline in the fair value of the investments in unconsolidated entities is other-than-temporary. Changes in economic and operating conditions that occur subsequent to our review of recoverability of investment property and other investments in unconsolidated entities could impact the assumptions used in that assessment and could result in future charges to earnings if assumptions regarding those investments differ from actual results. See the "Impairment" section within Note 4 - "Investment in Real Estate" for a discussion of recent impairments.
Investments in Unconsolidated Entities
Joint ventures are common in the real estate industry. We use joint ventures to finance properties, develop new properties, and diversify our risk in a particular property or portfolio of properties. We held material unconsolidated joint venture ownership interests in six13 properties as of December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 (see Note 5 - "Investment in Unconsolidated Entities, at Equity").
Certain of our joint venture properties are subject to various rights of first refusal, buy-sell provisions, put and call rights, or other sale or marketing rights for partners which are customary in real estate joint venture agreements and the industry. We and our partners in these joint ventures may initiate these provisions (subject to any applicable lock up or similar restrictions), which may result in either the sale of our interest or the use of available cash or borrowings to acquire the joint venture interest from our partner.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


Fair Value Measurements
The Company measures and discloses its fair value measurements in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 820 - “Fair Value Measurement” (“Topic 820”). Topic 820 guidance emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement.  Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.  As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity's own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).
The fair value hierarchy, as defined by Topic 820, contains three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value as follows:

Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access.

Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves, that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability which are typically based on an entity's own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity.

In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company's assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
Note 6 - "Indebtedness" includes a discussion of the fair value of debt measured using Level 1 and Level 2 inputs. Note 4 - "Investment in Real Estate" includes a discussion of the fair values recordedvalue inputs used in purchase accounting,our impairment analyses, using Level 2 and Level 3 inputs. Level 3 inputs, to our purchase accounting analysesprimarily. Level 3 inputs include our estimations of net operating results of the property, capitalization rates and discount rates. Similar Level 3 inputs are used in our impairment analyses noted above and in Note 4 - "Investment in Real Estate."
The Company has derivatives that must be measured under the fair value standard (see Note 7 - "Derivative Financial Instruments"). The Company currently does not have any non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
Purchase Accounting Valuation
We record the purchase pricetotal consideration of acquisitions, including transaction costs as permitted under Accounting Standards Update ("ASU ") 2017-1, "Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business," and any excess investment in unconsolidated entities to the various components of the acquisition based upon the fair value of each component which may be derived from various observable or unobservableLevel 2 and Level 3 inputs. Level 3 inputs include our estimations of net operating results of the property, capitalization rates and assumptions.discount rates. Also, we may utilize third party valuation specialists. These components typically include buildings, land and intangibles related to in-place leases and we estimate:
the fair value of land and related improvements and buildings on an as-if-vacant basis;
the market value of in-place leases based upon our best estimate of current market rents and amortize the resulting market rent adjustment into revenues;
the value of costs to obtain tenants, including tenant allowances and improvements and leasing commissions; and
the value of revenue and recovery of costs foregone during a reasonable lease-up period, as if the space was vacant.
The fair value of buildings is depreciated over the estimated remaining life of the acquired buildings or related improvements. We amortize tenant improvements, in-place lease assets and other lease-related intangibles over the remaining life of the underlying leases. We also estimate the value of other acquired intangible assets, if any, which are amortized over the remaining life of the underlying related intangibles.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


Use of Estimates
We prepared the accompanying consolidated and combined financial statements in accordance with GAAP. This requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the reported period. Our actual results could differ from these estimates.
Segment Disclosure
Our primary business is the ownership, development and management of retail real estate. We have aggregated our operations, including enclosed retail properties and community centers,open air properties, into one reportable segment because they have similar economic characteristics and we provide similar products and services to similar types of, and in many cases, the same tenants.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the FinancialAdoption of New Standards
On January 1, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards BoardUpdate ("FASB"ASU") issued ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)." using the modified retrospective approach. ASU No. 2014-09 revisesrevised GAAP by offering a single comprehensive revenue recognition standard instead of numerous revenue requirements for particular industries or transactions, which sometimes resulted in different accounting for economically similar transactions. An entity has the option to apply the provisions of ASU No. 2014-09 either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying this standard recognized at the date of initial application. On July 9, 2015, the FASB announced it would defer the effective date by one year to December 15, 2017 for annual reporting periods beginning after that date. The FASB also decided to permit early adoption of the standard, but not before the original effective date of December 15, 2016. This new standard will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2018 and at that point certain of our revenue streams will be impacted. The impacted revenue streams primarily consist of fees earned from management, development and leasing services provided to joint ventures in which we own an interest sales of real estate, and other ancillary income earned from our properties. In 2016, these revenues were less than 1%Upon adoption, we recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment to increase equity of consolidated revenue. We expect that fee incomeapproximately $2.5 million related to changes in the revenue recognition pattern of lease commissions earned by the Company from our joint ventures forventures. We do not expect the above-mentioned servicesadoption of ASU 2014-09 to have a material impact to our net income on an ongoing basis.
Additionally, we adopted the clarified scope guidance of ASC 610-20, "Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets" in conjunction with ASU 2014-09, using the modified retrospective approach. ASC 610-20 applies to the sale, transfer and derecognition of nonfinancial assets and in substance nonfinancial assets to noncustomers, including partial sales, and eliminates the guidance specific to real estate in ASC 360-20. With respect to full disposals, the recognition will generally be recognized in a manner consistent with our current measurement and patternspattern of recognition. AsWith respect to partial sales of real estate to joint ventures, the new guidance requires us to recognize a full gain where an equity investment is retained. These transactions could result in a basis difference as we do not expectwill be required to measure our retained equity interest at fair value, whereas the joint venture may continue to measure the assets received at carryover basis. No adjustments were required upon adoption of this standard.
On January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2017-12, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities." ASU 2017-12 aims to reduce complexity in cash value hedges of interest rate risk and eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness, generally requiring the entire change in the fair value of the hedging instrument to be presented in the same income statement line as the hedged item. Upon adoption, we recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment of $0.6 million between accumulated other comprehensive income and retained earnings.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


The cumulative effect of the changes to our consolidated January 1, 2018 balance sheet for the adoption of this standardASU 2014-09 and ASU 2017-12 were as follows:
 Balance at December 31, 2017 Adjustments Due to
ASU 2014-09
 Adjustments Due to
ASU 2017-12
 Balance at January 1, 2018
Balance Sheet       
Liabilities       
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, and deferred revenues$264,998
 $(2,474) $
 $262,524
        
Equity       
Capital in excess of par value$1,240,483
 $(389) $
 $1,240,094
Accumulated deficit$(350,594) $2,474
 $(584) $(348,704)
Accumulated other comprehensive income$6,920
 $
 $584
 $7,504
Noncontrolling interests$167,718
 $389
 $
 $168,107
In accordance with ASU 2014-09 requirements, the disclosure of the impact of adoption on our consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 and consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018 were as follows:
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
 As Reported Balances Without Adoption of ASU 2014-09 Effect of Change Higher/(Lower)
Consolidated Statements of Operations     
Revenues     
Other income$30,504
 $29,954
 $550
 December 31, 2018
 As Reported Balances Without Adoption of ASU 2014-09 Effect of Change Higher/(Lower)
Balance Sheet     
Liabilities     
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, and deferred revenues$253,862
 $256,886
 $(3,024)
      
Equity     
Capital in excess of par value$1,247,639
 $1,248,111
 $(472)
Accumulated deficit$(456,924) $(459,948) $3,024
Noncontrolling interests$148,561
 $148,089
 $472
On January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)" and ASU 2016-18 "Restricted Cash" using a retrospective transition approach, which changed our statements of cash flows and related disclosures for all periods presented. ASU 2016-15 is intended to have a significantreduce diversity in practice with respect to how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows and its adoption had no impact on our consolidated resultsfinancial statements. ASU 2016-18 requires that a statement of operations upon adoptioncash flows explain the change during the period in 2018. We expecttotal of cash, cash equivalents and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to adoptConsolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


The following is a summary of our cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash total as presented in our statements of cash flows for the standard usingyears ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:
 For the Year Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
Cash and cash equivalents$42,542
 $52,019
 $59,353
Restricted cash18,542
 18,182
 29,160
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$61,084
 $70,201
 $88,513
For the modified retrospective approach, which requires a cumulative effect adjustmentyear ended December 31, 2017, restricted cash related to cash flows provided by operating activities of $2.9 million, restricted cash related to cash flows used in investing activities of $6.4 million, and restricted cash related to cash flows used in financing activities of $1.7 million were reclassified. For the year ended December 31, 2016, restricted cash related to cash flows provided by operating activities of $0.8 million, restricted cash related to cash flows used in investing activities of $1.5 million, and restricted cash related to cash flows used in financing activities of $10.4 million were reclassified. Restricted cash primarily relates to cash held in escrow for payment of real estate taxes and property reserves for maintenance, expansion or leasehold improvements as required by our mortgage loans. Restricted cash is included in "Deferred costs and other assets" in the accompanying balance sheets as of the date of adoption.December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
New Standards Issued But Not Yet Adopted
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)." ASU No. 2016-02 amends the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. It is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The new leases standard requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. In July 2018, the FASB approved an amendment that provides an entity the optional transition method to initially account for the impact of the adoption ASU 2016-02 with a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings on January 1, 2019 (the effective date of the ASU), rather than January 1, 2017, which would eliminate the need to restate amounts presented prior to January 1, 2019. We will utilize this optional transition method. From a lessee perspective, the Company currently has sevenfour material ground leases, two material office leases, and one material garage lease that, under the new guidance, will result in the recognition of a lease liability and corresponding right-of-use asset. As of December 31, 2018, undiscounted future minimum lease payments due under these leases total approximately $31.1 million with termination dates which range from 2023 to 2076 and we expect the recognized lease liability and corresponding right-of-use asset to not exceed $20.0 millionupon adoption.
From a lessor perspective, the new guidance remains mostly similar to current rules, though contract consideration will now be allocated between lease and non-lease components. Non-lease componentscomponent allocations will be recognized under ASU 2014-09, and we expect that this will result in a different pattern of recognition for certain non-lease components, including for fixed common-area ("CAM") revenues. However, the FASB's amendment to ASU 2016-02 referred to above allows lessors to elect, as a practical expedient, not to allocate the total consideration to lease and non-lease components based on their relative standalone selling prices. This practical expedient allows lessors to elect a combined single lease component presentation if (i) the timing and pattern of the revenue recognition of the combined single lease component is the same, and (ii) the combined single component would be classified as an operating lease. We believe we meet the criteria to use this practical expedient and we plan to elect this practical expedient upon the effective date. In addition, ASU 2016-02 limits the capitalization of leasing costs to initial direct costs, which will likely result in a reduction to our capitalized leasing costs and an increase to general and administrative expense,expenses, though the amount of such changes is highly dependent upon the leasing compensation structures in place at the time of adoption. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company deferred $17.7 million and $16.9 million of internal leasing costs, respectively. From a lessor perspective, other than the reduction to capitalized leasing costs and increase to general and administrative expenses related to internal leasing costs based on the Company’s current leasing compensation structure, which is not expected to change significantly upon adoption of ASU 2016-02, we do not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-02 to have a material impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, "Fair Value Measurements (ASC 820): Disclosure Framework- Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurements." ASU 2018-13 eliminates certain disclosure requirements for all entities, requires public entities to disclose certain new information, and modifies some disclosure requirements. ASU 2018-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this standardASU will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs." This standard amended existing guidance to require the presentation of debt issuance costs in the balance sheet as a deduction from the carrying amount of thestatements and related debt liability instead of as a deferred charge. It was effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, but early adoption was permitted. This new guidance reduced total assets and total long-term debt on our consolidated balance sheets by amounts ($14.6 million and $19.9 million as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively) previously classified as deferred debt issuance costs, but did not have any other effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, "Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments," which eliminates the requirement for an acquirer in a business combination to account for measurement-period adjustments retrospectively. Under this ASU, acquirers must recognize measurement-period adjustments in the period in which they determine the amounts, including the effect on earnings of any amounts they would have recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginningdisclosures.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company elected to early adopt this ASU in the third quarter of 2015, resulting in no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)." ASU No. 2016-15 is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. It is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted. In addition, in November 2016, the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") of the FASB issued EITF Issue 16-A "Restricted Cash," requiring that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash would be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. This guidance is also effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods and also requires a retrospective transition approach. These new standards require a retrospective transition approach. The Company has $29.2 million and $38.9 million of restricted cash on its consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, whose cash flow statement classification will change to align with the new guidance upon adoption of the EITF. We are currently evaluating our plans regarding the adoption date of these new standards.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, "Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business," that provides guidance to assist entities with evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities (set) is a business. The new guidance requires an acquirer to determine if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of assets; if so, the set of transferred assets and activities is not a business. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted. The new guidance will be applied on a prospective basis for transactions that occur within the period of adoption. Upon adoption of this standard, the Company anticipates that more property acquisitions will be accounted for under asset acquisition accounting rather than business combination accounting, which will result in the capitalization of transactions costs rather than expensing of said costs under the current guidance. We will early adopt this standard prospectively as of January 1, 2017, as permitted under the standard.
Reclassifications
Reclassifications of certain amounts in the 2015 and 2014 consolidated and combined financial statements have been made in order to conform with the 2016 presentation.
Deferred Costs and Other Assets
Deferred costs and other assets include the following as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:
  2016 2015
Deferred lease costs and corporate improvements, net $90,922
 $100,837
In-place lease intangibles, net 70,907
 99,836
Acquired above market lease intangibles, net 34,337
 47,285
Mortgage and other escrow deposits 29,160
 38,906
Prepaids, notes receivable and other assets, net 41,230
 16,368
  $266,556
 $303,232
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


Deferred LeaseCosts and Other Assets
Deferred costs and other assets include the following as of December 31, 2018 and 2017:
  2018 2017
Deferred leasing costs and corporate improvements, net $74,260
 $79,079
In-place lease intangibles, net 38,453
 46,627
Acquired above market lease intangibles, net 18,827
 24,254
Mortgage and other escrow deposits 18,542
 18,182
Prepaids, notes receivable and other assets, net 19,053
 20,953
  $169,135
 $189,095
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company received the remaining $5.3 million outstanding on the promissory note receivable related to the August 19, 2016 sale of Knoxville Center, located in Knoxville, Tennessee (see Note 4 - "Investment in Real Estate" for details).
Deferred Leasing Costs and Corporate Improvements
Our deferred leaseleasing costs consist of salaries and related benefits, including fees charged by SPG in conjunction with the 2014 spin-off (see Note 11- "Related Party Transactions" for further details), for salaries and related benefits incurred in connection with lease originations, and fees paid to third party brokers. We record amortization of deferred leasing costs on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases. Details of deferred leaseleasing costs and corporate improvements as of December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 are as follows:
 2016 2015 2018 2017
Deferred lease costs $149,208
 $164,693
Deferred leasing costs $142,903
 $143,667
Corporate improvements 4,085
 3,829
 6,072
 5,324
Accumulated amortization (62,371) (67,685) (74,715) (69,912)
Deferred lease costs and corporate improvements, net $90,922
 $100,837
 $74,260
 $79,079
Amortization of deferred leasing costs is a component of depreciation and amortization expense. The accompanying consolidated and combined statements of operations include amortization expense of $25.0$27.9 million, $27.2$25.9 million, and $12.5$26.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, respectively.
Revenue Recognition
We,The following tables disaggregate our revenue by major source for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
 Minimum rent Overage rent Tenant reimbursements Other income Total
Lease related$492,169
 $9,313
 $191,319
 $3,457
 $696,258
Ancillary
 
 
 10,275
 10,275
Fee related
 
 
 9,527
 9,527
Other(1)

 
 
 7,245
 7,245
Total revenues$492,169
 $9,313
 $191,319
 $30,504
 $723,305
(1) Primarily relates to insurance proceeds received from property insurance claims and excess franchise tax refunds for a previously-owned property.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as a lessor, retain substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the investment properties and account for our leases as operating leases. We generally accrue minimum rentsin millions or billions)


 For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
 Minimum rent Overage rent Tenant reimbursements Other income Total
Lease related$516,386
 $9,115
 $208,290
 $3,492
 $737,283
Ancillary
 
 
 9,848
 9,848
Fee related
 
 
 7,906
 7,906
Other
 
 
 3,085
 3,085
Total revenues$516,386
 $9,115
 $208,290
 $24,331
 $758,122
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
 Minimum rent Overage rent Tenant reimbursements Other income Total
Lease related$572,781
 $12,882
 $236,510
 $1,310
 $823,483
Ancillary
 
 
 10,111
 10,111
Fee related
 
 
 6,709
 6,709
Other
 
 
 3,172
 3,172
Total revenues$572,781
 $12,882
 $236,510
 $21,302
 $843,475
Minimum Rent
Minimum rent is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of their respective leases. Minimum rent also includes accretion related to above-market and below-market lease intangibles related to the acquisition of operating properties. We amortize any tenant inducements as a reduction of revenue utilizing the straight-line method over the term of the related lease or occupancy term of the tenant, if shorter.
Overage Rent
A large number of our retail tenants are also required to pay overage rents based on sales over a stated base amount during the lease year. We recognize overage rents only when each tenant's sales exceed the applicable sales threshold as defined in their lease. We amortize any tenant inducements as a reduction of revenue utilizing the straight-line method over the term of the related lease or occupancy term of the tenant, if shorter.
Tenant Reimbursements
A substantial portion of our leases require the tenant to reimburse us for a substantialmaterial portion of our property operating expenses, including CAM, real estate taxes and insurance. This significantly reduces our exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation. Such property operating expenses typically include utility, insurance, security, janitorial, landscaping, food court and other administrative expenses. As of December 31, 2016Tenant reimbursements are established in the vast majority of our shopping center leases receiveor computed based upon a fixed payment fromformula related to real estate taxes, insurance and other property operating expenses and are recognized as revenues in the tenant for the CAM component which is recorded as revenue whenperiod they are earned. When not reimbursed by the fixed-CAMfixed CAM component, CAM expense reimbursements are based on the tenant's proportionate share of the allocable operating expenses and CAM capital expenditures for the property. We accrue reimbursements from tenants for recoverable portions of all these expenses as revenue in the period the applicable expenditures are incurred. We also receive escrow payments for these reimbursements from substantially all our non-fixed CAM tenants and monthly fixed CAM payments throughout the year. We recognize differences between estimated recoveries and the final billed amounts in the subsequent year.
Other Income
Lease related: We collect lease termination income from tenants to allow for the tenant to vacate their space prior to their scheduled lease termination date. We recognize lease termination income in the period when a termination agreement is signed, collectability is assured, and we are no longer obligated to provide space to the tenant. In the event that a tenant is in bankruptcy when the termination agreement is signed, termination fee income is deferred and recognized when, and if, it is received.
Ancillary: We seek to monetize our common areas through robust ancillary programs. These differences were not materialprograms include destination holiday experiences, customer service programs, sponsored children's play areas and local events, and static and digital media initiatives. We enter into agreements with unrelated third parties under these programs and charge a negotiated fee in any period presented. Our advertisingexchange for providing the unrelated third party access to the common area as defined under the respective agreements. We recognize the fee as revenue as we satisfy our performance obligations, which typically occurs over one year.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and promotionalWashington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


Fee related: We collect fee income primarily from our unconsolidated joint ventures in exchange for providing management, leasing, and development services. Management fees are charged as a percentage of revenues (as defined in the applicable management agreements) and are recognized as revenue as we render such services. Leasing fees are charged on a fixed amount per square foot signed or a percentage of net rent negotiated within the underlying lease and are recognized upon lease execution. Development fees are charged on a contractual percentage of hard costs to develop the respective asset and are expensedrecognized as incurred.we satisfy our obligation to provide the development services.
Allowance for Credit Losses
We record a provision for credit losses based on our judgment of a tenant's creditworthiness, ability to pay and probability of collection. In addition, we also consider the retail sector in which the tenant operates and our historical collection experience in cases of bankruptcy, if applicable. Accounts are written off when they are deemed to be no longer collectible. The activity in the allowance for credit losses, which are included in "Tenant receivables and accrued revenue, net" in the accompanying balance sheets, during the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 is as follows:
 For the Year Ended December 31, For the Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014 2018 2017 2016
Balance, beginning of year $4,222
 $4,570
 $4,412
 $7,867
 $8,578
 $4,222
Provision for credit losses 4,508
 2,022
 2,332
 5,826
 5,068
 4,508
Accounts written off, net of recoveries (152) (2,370) (2,174)
Accounts deconsolidated upon joint venture formation (see Note 5) 
 (1,271) 
Accounts written off, net of recoveries, and other (3,562) (4,508) (152)
Balance, end of year $8,578
 $4,222
 $4,570
 $10,131
 $7,867
 $8,578
Income and Other Taxes
WPG Inc. has elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code and applicable Treasury regulations relating to REIT qualification. In order to maintain REIT status, the regulations require the entity to distribute
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


at least 90% of taxable income, exclusive of net capital gains, to its owners and meet certain other asset and income tests as well as other requirements. WPG Inc. intends to continue to adhere to these requirements and maintain its REIT status and that of its REIT subsidiaries. As a REIT, WPG Inc. will generally not be liable for federal corporate income taxes as long as it continues to distribute in excessat least of 100% of its taxable income. Thus, we made no provision for federal income taxes on WPG Inc. in the accompanying consolidated and combined financial statements. If WPG Inc. fails to qualify as a REIT, it will be subject to tax at regular corporate rates for the years in which it failed to qualify. If WPG Inc. loses its REIT status it could not elect to be taxed as a REIT for four years unless its failure to qualify was due to reasonable cause and certain other conditions were satisfied.
We have also elected taxable REIT subsidiary ("TRS") status for some of WPG Inc.'s subsidiaries. This enables us to provide services that would otherwise be considered impermissible for REITs and participate in activities that do not qualify as "rents from real property." For the yearyears ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, we recorded a federal income tax provisionprovisions (benefits) of $525, $(87), and $227, respectively, related to the taxable income generated by the TRS entities, which expense is included in income and other taxes in the accompanying consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).income. For these entities, deferred tax assets and liabilities are established for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities at the enacted tax rates to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. As ofThere were no deferred tax assets or liabilities for the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 2015, the TRS had a deferred tax asset before valuation allowances of $673 and $0, respectively,2017 as a result of federal and state net operating loss carryovers.
A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is provided if we believe all or some portion of the deferred tax asset may not be realized. An increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from the change in circumstances that causes a change in our judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax asset is included in income. There were no valuation allowances as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, as the TRS did not have any net operating loss carryovers. As of December 31, 20162018 and 2015, the TRS valuation allowance for federal and state net operating loss carryovers was $367 and $0, respectively. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015,2017, the TRS had ano net deferred tax assets of $306 and $0, respectively.related to net operating loss carryovers.
We are also subject to certain other taxes, including state and local taxes and franchise taxes, which are included in income and other taxes in the accompanying consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).income.
For federal income tax purposes, the cash distributions paid to WPG Inc.'s common and preferred shareholders may be characterized as ordinary income, return of capital (generally non-taxable) or capital gains. Tax law permits certain characterization of distributions which could result in differences between cash basis and tax basis distribution amounts.
The following characterizes distributions paid per common and preferred share on a tax basis for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 (from inception on May 28, 2014):
  2016 2015 2014
  $ % $ % $ %
Common shares            
Ordinary income $0.6128
 61.28% $1.0000
 100.00% $0.4805
 96.10%
Capital gain 
 % 
 % 0.0195
 3.90%
Non-dividend distributions 0.3872
 38.72% 
 % 
 %
  $1.0000
 100.00% $1.0000
 100.00% $0.5000
 100.00%
             
Series G Preferred Shares (1)            
Ordinary income $
 N/A $0.5868
 2.29% N/A N/A
Non-dividend distributions (2) 
 N/A 25.0000
 97.71% N/A N/A
  $
 N/A $25.5868
 100.00% N/A N/A
           �� 
Series H Preferred Shares (1)            
Ordinary income $1.4064
 100.00% $1.8752
 100.00% N/A N/A
             
Series I Preferred Shares (1)            
Ordinary income $1.2891
 100.00% $1.7188
 100.00% N/A N/A
(1) Shares issued in conjunction with the Merger on January 15, 2015.
(2) Shares redeemed in full on April 15, 2015.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


Noncontrolling Interests for WPG Inc.
Details of the carrying amount of WPG Inc.'s noncontrolling interests are as follows as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:
  2016 2015
Limited partners' interests in WPG L.P.  $168,264
 $190,297
Noncontrolling interests in properties 1,104
 1,082
 
 
Total noncontrolling interests $169,368
 $191,379
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests (which includes limited partners' interests in WPG L.P. and noncontrolling interests in consolidated properties) is a component of consolidated and combined net income of WPG Inc.
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests for WPG Inc.
Redeemable noncontrolling interests represent the underlying equity held by unaffiliated third parties in the consolidated joint venture entity that owns Arbor Hills, located in Ann Arbor, Michigan (the "Arbor Hills Venture") and the consolidated joint venture that owns Classen Curve and The Triangle at Classen Curve, each located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma and Nichols Hills Plaza, located in Nichols Hills, Oklahoma (the "Oklahoma City Properties Venture," collectively) as well as the outstanding Series I-1 Preferred Interests. The unaffiliated third parties have, at their option, the right to have their equity purchased by the Company subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions.
The non-controlling interests in both the Arbor Hills Venture and the Oklahoma City Properties Venture are redeemable at the option of the holders under certain circumstances according to the terms of the respective joint venture agreements. These noncontrolling interests are presented as redeemable noncontrolling interests outside of permanent equity on the Company's consolidated balance sheets for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. The Company adjusts the carrying amount of the redeemable noncontrolling interests to their maximum redemption value at the end of each reporting period, after allocating their pro-rata amount of net income (loss) and any contributions received, or distributions to, the redeemable noncontrolling interests. Changes in the redemption value of the redeemable noncontrolling interests are recorded within shareholder’s equity. Future reductions in the carrying amounts are limited to the original recorded fair value of the redeemable noncontrolling interests. The Company estimates the maximum redemption amounts based upon the terms of the applicable joint venture agreement, using Level 3 inputs such as: expected market capitalization rates, discount rates, and estimated future cash flows. As part of the Company's fourth quarter 2016 evaluation, the Company recorded an adjustment of $5,464 to redeemable noncontrolling interest in order to reflect the redeemable noncontrolling interest at maximum redemption value, which we believe approximates the fair value for such interests.
4.    Investment in Real Estate
Summary
Investment properties consisted of the following as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:
  2016 2015
Land $905,960
 $1,005,529
Buildings and improvements 5,299,427
 5,569,268
Total land, buildings and improvements 6,205,387
 6,574,797
Furniture, fixtures and equipment 89,241
 81,403
Investment properties at cost 6,294,628
 6,656,200
Less: accumulated depreciation 2,122,572
 2,225,750
Investment properties at cost, net $4,172,056
 $4,430,450
 
 
Construction in progress included above $49,214
 $80,178

Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


The Merger
On January 15, 2015, we acquired 23 properties in the Merger (see Note 1 - "Organization"). We reflected the assetsfollowing characterizes distributions paid per common and liabilities of the properties acquired in the Merger at the estimated fair valuepreferred share on the January 15, 2015 acquisition date. The following table summarizes the fair value allocationa tax basis for the acquisition, which was finalized during the three monthsyears ended MarchDecember 31, 20162018, 2017 and did not result in any material change from the estimated fair values disclosed in the 2015 Form 10-K:2016:
Investment properties $3,091,410
Cash and cash equivalents (1) 547,294
Tenant accounts receivable 14,311
Investment in and advances to unconsolidated real estate entities 21,994
Deferred costs and other assets (including intangibles) 370,079
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, and deferred revenue (289,551)
Distributions payable (2,658)
Redeemable noncontrolling interests, including preferred units (5,795)
Total assets acquired and liabilities assumed 3,747,084
Fair value of mortgage notes payable assumed (1,356,389)
Net assets acquired 2,390,695
Less: Common shares issued (535,490)
Less: Preferred shares issued (319,960)
Less: Common operating partnership units issued to limited partners (29,482)
Less: Cash and cash equivalents acquired (547,294)
Net cash paid for acquisition $958,469
  2018 2017 2016
  $ % $ % $ %
Common shares            
Ordinary income $1.0000
 100.00% $0.4306
 43.06% $0.6128
 61.28%
Capital gain 
 
 0.5694
 56.94% 
 
Non-dividend distributions 
 
 
 
 0.3872
 38.72%
  $1.0000
 100.00% $1.0000
 100.00% $1.0000
 100.00%
             
Series H Preferred Shares            
Ordinary income $1.8752
 100.00% $1.0093
 43.06% $1.4064
 100.00%
Capital gain 
 
 1.3347
 56.94% 
 
  $1.8752
 100.00% $2.3440
 100.00% $1.4064
 100.00%
             
Series I Preferred Shares            
Ordinary income $1.7188
 100.00% $0.9251
 43.06% $1.2891
 100.00%
Capital gain 
 
 1.2234
 56.94% 
 
  $1.7188
 100.00% $2.1485
 100.00% $1.2891
 100.00%
(1)Includes the proceeds from the Property Sale, net
Noncontrolling Interests for WPG Inc.
Details of the carrying amount of WPG Inc.'s noncontrolling interests are as follows as of the repayment of the $155.0 million balance on the GRT credit facility.
The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2016 contains certain intangible assets associated with2018 and 2017:
  2018 2017
Limited partners' interests in WPG L.P.  $147,493
 $166,660
Noncontrolling interests in properties 1,068
 1,058
Total noncontrolling interests $148,561
 $167,718
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests (which includes limited partners' interests in WPG L.P. and noncontrolling interests in consolidated properties) is a component of consolidated net income of WPG Inc.
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests for WPG Inc.
During the Merger (excluding the amounts relatedyear ended December 31, 2017, but prior to the completion of the O'Connor Properties, which were transferred to unconsolidated entities on June 1, 2015, perJoint Venture II transaction (see Note 5 - "Investment in Unconsolidated Entities, at Equity" for further details), the Company purchased all of the redeemable noncontrolling interest equity owned by the unaffiliated third parties in consolidated joint venture entities that owned Arbor Hills, located in Ann Arbor, Michigan and other dispositions)Classen Curve and The Triangle at Classen Curve, each located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma and Nichols Hills Plaza, located in Nichols Hills, Oklahoma (the "Oklahoma City Properties," collectively). Intangibles of $72.3 million, which relate primarily to above-market leases and lease in place values, are included in “Deferred costs and other assets” atAt December 31, 2016. Intangibles2018 and 2017, redeemable noncontrolling interests represented the outstanding 130,592 units of $79.1 million, which are primarily relatedWPG L.P. 7.3% Series I-1 Preferred Units (the "Series I-1 Preferred Units"). Dividends accrue quarterly at an annual rate of 7.3% per share. The unaffiliated third parties have, at their option, the right to below-market leases, are includedhave their equity purchased by the Company subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in “Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles,thousands, except share, unit, per share and deferred revenue” atper unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


4.Investment in Real Estate
Summary
Investment properties consisted of the following as of December 31, 2016.2018 and 2017:
  2018 2017
Land $836,214
 $807,202
Buildings and improvements 4,980,939
 4,908,794
Total land, buildings and improvements 5,817,153
 5,715,996
Furniture, fixtures and equipment 97,552
 91,764
Investment properties at cost 5,914,705
 5,807,760
Less: accumulated depreciation 2,283,764
 2,139,620
Investment properties at cost, net $3,630,941
 $3,668,140
 
 
Construction in progress included above $35,068
 $46,046
Real Estate Acquisitions and Dispositions
We acquire interests in properties to generate both current income and long-term appreciation in value. We acquire interests in individual properties or portfolios of retail real estate companies that meet our investment criteria and selldispose of properties which no longer meet our strategic criteria. Unless otherwise noted below, gains and losses on these transactions are included in (loss) gain upon acquisition of controlling interests and(loss) on sale of interests in properties, net in the accompanying consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). We expense acquisition and potential acquisition costs related to business combinations and disposition related costs as they are incurred. We incurred a minimal amount of transaction expenses during 2016, 2015, and 2014, excluding those related to the separation from SPG and Merger disclosed in Note 1 - "Organization."income.
No acquisition activity occurred during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Acquisition activity for the year ended December 31, 2016. Acquisition activity other than the Merger for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 20142018 and disposition activity for the years ended December 31, 20162018, 2017 and 20142016 is highlighted as follows:
2015 Acquisition2018 Acquisitions
On January 13, 2015,April 11, 2018, we acquired, Canyon View Marketplace,through a shopping centersale-leaseback transaction, four Sears department stores and adjacent Sears Auto Centers at Longview Mall, located in Grand Junction, Colorado, for $10.0 million including the assumption of an existing mortgage with a principal balance of $5.5 million.Longview, Texas; Polaris Fashion Place®, located in Columbus, Ohio; Southern Hills Mall, located in Sioux City, Iowa; and Town Center at Aurora, located in Aurora, Colorado. The purchase price was substantially comprisedapproximately $28.5 million and was funded by a combination of $13.4 million from our Facility (as defined in Note 6 - "Indebtedness"), $9.7 million from the first tranche of the Four Corners transaction, as discussed below, and $5.4 million from O'Connor Mall Partners, L.P. ("O'Connor") related to their pro-rata share of the joint venture that owns Polaris Fashion Place® (see Note 5 - "Investment in Unconsolidated Entities, at Equity").
On April 24, 2018, the Company closed on the acquisition of Southgate Mall, located in Missoula, Montana, for $58.0 million, which was funded from our Facility (as defined in Note 6 - "Indebtedness").
The following table summarizes the fair value allocation for the acquisitions, which was finalized during the three months ended June 30, 2018:
Investment properties $72,647
Investment in and advances to unconsolidated entities, at equity 5,543
Deferred costs and other assets 10,311
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, and deferred revenue (8,393)
Net cash paid for acquisitions $80,108
Intangibles of $10.3 million, which relate primarily to above-market leases and lease in place values, are included in “Deferred costs and other assets” as of the acquired investment property.respective acquisition dates. The sourceinitial weighted average useful life of funding for the intangible assets was 11.5 years. Intangibles of $4.9 million, which relate primarily to below-market leases, are included in “Accounts payable, accrued expense, intangibles, and deferred revenue” as of the respective acquisition dates. The initial weighted average useful life of the intangible liabilities was cash on hand.9.6 years.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


2014 AcquisitionsThe transactions were accounted for as asset acquisitions and accordingly, $0.6 million of transaction costs were capitalized as part of the allocation of fair value.
2018 Dispositions
During 2014,the year ended December 31, 2018, we acquired our partners' interests incompleted the following properties, which were previously accounted for undersale of various tranches of restaurant outparcels to FCPT Acquisitions, LLC ("Four Corners") pursuant to the equity method, but are now consolidated as they are either wholly or majority ownedpurchase and controlled post-acquisition:
Shopping Center NameAcquisition DateLocationPercent Acquired
Purchase Price
(In Millions)
Gain
(In Millions)
Whitehall MallDecember 1, 2014Whitehall, PA50%$14.9
$10.5
Clay TerraceJune 20, 2014Carmel, IN50%$22.9
$46.6
Seven Open-Air Shopping CentersJune 18, 2014VariousVarious$162.0
$42.3
We reflectedsale agreement executed on September 20, 2017 between the assetsCompany and liabilities of the above acquisition properties at the estimated fair value on the respective acquisition dates and recorded remeasurement gains on our previous investments as indicated in the table above.Four Corners. The following table summarizes the fair value allocations for the acquisitions, which were finalized during 2015:key terms of each tranche:
Investment properties $471,293
Deferred costs and other assets (including intangibles) 67,530
Mortgage notes payable (218,064)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, and deferred revenue (39,866)
Other liabilities (1,858)
Net assets acquired 279,035
Noncontrolling interest (1,032)
Prior net cash distributions and losses 20,895
Gain on pre-existing interest (99,375)
Fair value of total consideration transferred 199,523
Less: Units issued (22,464)
Less: Cash acquired (8,459)
Net cash paid for acquisitions $168,600
Tranche Sales Date Parcels Sold Purchase Price Sales Proceeds
Tranche 1 January 12, 2018 10
 $13,692
 $13,506
Tranche 2 June 29, 2018 5
 9,503
 9,423
Tranche 3 July 27, 2018 2
 4,607
 4,530
Tranche 4 October 31, 2018 2
 1,718
 1,714
Tranche 5 November 16, 2018 1
 3,195
 3,166
    20
 $32,715
 $32,339
The Company used the proceeds to fund a portion of the acquisition of the Sears parcels on April 11, 2018 as discussed above, to reduce corporate debt, and to fund ongoing redevelopment efforts. The Company expects to close on the remaining 24 outparcels for approximately $37.5 million during the first half of 2019, subject to due diligence and closing conditions (see Note 13 - "Subsequent Events" for additional details).
In connection with the 2018 dispositions, the Company recorded a net gain of $24.6 million which is included in gain (loss) on disposition of interests in properties, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2018.
On October 23, 2018, Rushmore Mall, located in Rapid City, South Dakota, was transitioned to the lender (see Note 6 - "Indebtedness" for further discussion).
2017 Dispositions
On November 3, 2017, we completed the sale of Colonial Park Mall, located in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, to an unaffiliated private real estate investor for a purchase price of $15.0 million. The net proceeds were used for general corporate purposes.
On June 13, 2017, we sold 49% of our interest in Malibu Lumber Yard, located in Malibu, California, as part of the O'Connor Joint Venture II transaction (as defined below and as discussed in in Note 5 - "Investment in Unconsolidated Entities, at Equity").
On June 7, 2017, we completed the sale of Morgantown Commons, located in Morgantown, West Virginia, to an unaffiliated private real estate investor for a purchase price of approximately $6.7 million. The net proceeds were used for general corporate purposes.
On May 16, 2017, we completed the sale of an 80,000 square foot (unaudited) vacant anchor parcel at Indian Mound Mall, located in Heath, Ohio, to an unaffiliated private real estate investor for a purchase price of approximately $0.8 million. The net proceeds were used for general corporate purposes.
On May 12, 2017, we completed the transaction with regard to the ownership and operation of six of the Company's retail properties and certain related outparcels (the "O'Connor Joint Venture II" as discussed in Note 5 - "Investment in Unconsolidated Entities, at Equity").
On February 21, 2017, we completed the sale of Gulf View Square, located in Port Richey, Florida, and River Oaks Center, located in Chicago, Illinois, to unaffiliated private real estate investors for an aggregate purchase price of $42.0 million. The net proceeds from the transaction were used to reduce corporate debt.
On January 10, 2014, SPG acquired one2017, we completed the sale of its partner's remainingVirginia Center Commons, located in Glen Allen, Virginia, to an unaffiliated private real estate investor for a purchase price of $9.0 million. The net proceeds from the transaction were used to reduce corporate debt.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


In connection with the 2017 dispositions, the Company recorded a net gain of $124.8 million which is included in gain (loss) on disposition of interests in three properties, that were contributed to WPG. The consideration paidnet in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the partner's remaining interestsyear ended December 31, 2017.
On October 3, 2017, Valle Vista Mall, located in these three propertiesHarlingen, Texas, was approximately $4.6 million in cash. Two of these properties were previously consolidated and are now wholly owned. The remaining property is accountedtransitioned to the lender (see Note 6 - "Indebtedness" for under the equity method.further discussion).
2016 Dispositions
On November 10, 2016, we completed the sale of Richmond Town Square, a wholly owned shopping center located in Cleveland, Ohio, to a private real estate investor for a purchase price of $7.3 million. The net proceeds from the transaction were used to reduce the balance of corporate debt.
On August 19, 2016, the Company completed the sale of Knoxville Center a wholly owned shopping center located in Knoxville, Tennessee, to a private real estate investor (the "Buyer") for a purchase price of $10.1 million. The sales price consisted of $3.9 million paid to the Company at closing and the issuance of a promissory note for $6.2 million from the Buyer to the Company with an interest rate of 5.5% per annum.annum (see Note 3 - "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" for further discussion). The remaining note receivable balance is due on February 28, 2017, with one six-month extension available toof $5.3 million was received during the Buyer. As ofyear ended December 31, 2016, the Buyer was current on their interest payments.2018. The net proceeds from the transactionstransaction were used to reduce the balance outstanding under the Facility.Facility (see Note 6 - "Indebtedness").
On January 29, 2016, we completed the sale of Forest Mall a wholly owned shopping center located in Fond Du Lac, Wisconsin, and Northlake Mall a wholly owned shopping center located in Atlanta, Georgia, to private real estate investors (the "Buyers") for an aggregate purchase price of $30 million, which was classified as real estate held for sale on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015.million. The sales price consisted of $10 million paid to us at closing and the issuance of a promissory note for $20 million from us to the Buyers with an interest rate of 6% per annum. On June 29, 2016, the Buyers repaid $4.4 million of the promissory note balance and exercised a six-month extension option. The remaining $15.6 million note
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


balance was repaidproceeds were paid in full on January 4, 2017. The net proceeds from the transaction were used to reduce the balance outstanding under the Facility.Facility (see Note 6 - "Indebtedness").
In connection with the 2016 dispositions, above, the Company recorded a net loss of $2.0 million, net loss, which is included in gain (loss) gain upon acquisition of controlling interests and on saledisposition of interests in properties, net in the accompanying consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2016.
On December 29, 2016, June 9, 2016 and April 28, 2016, River Valley Mall, located in Lancaster, Ohio, Merritt Square Mall, located in Merritt Island, Florida, and Chesapeake Square, located in Chesapeake, Virginia, were transitioned to the lenders, respectively (see Note 6 - "Indebtedness" for further discussion).
2014 Dispositions
On July 17, 2014, we sold Highland Lakes Center, a wholly owned shopping center in Orlando, Florida, for net proceeds of $20.5 million.
On June 23, 2014, we sold New Castle Plaza, a wholly owned shopping center in New Castle, Indiana, for net proceeds of $4.4 million.
On February 28, 2014, SPG disposed of its interest in one unconsolidated shopping center and recorded a gain of approximately $0.2 million. This property was part of a portfolio of interests in properties, the remainder of which is included within those properties distributed by SPG to WPG on May 28, 2014.
In connection with the dispositions above, the Company recorded an $11.6 million net gain, which is included in (loss) gain upon acquisition of controlling interests and on sale of interests in properties, net in the accompanying consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Intangible Assets and Liabilities Associated with Acquisitions
Intangible assets and liabilities, which were recorded at the respective acquisition dates, are associated with the Company's acquisitions of properties at fair value. The gross intangibles recorded as of their respective acquisition date are comprised of an asset for acquired above-market leases in which the Company is the lessor, a liability for acquired below-market leases in which the Company is the lessor, a liability for an acquired above-market ground lease in which the Company is the lessee, and an asset for in-place leases.
The following table denotes the gross carrying values of the respective intangibles as of December 31, 20162018 and 2015:2017:
 Balance as of Balance as of
Intangible
Asset/Liability
 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
Above-market leases - Company is lessor $56,192
 $62,900
 $48,373
 $51,315
Below-market leases - Company is lessor $145,064
 $162,699
 $117,395
 $124,475
Above-market lease - Company is lessee $2,536
 $2,536
In-place leases $134,516
 $156,842
 $109,379
 $120,159
The intangibles related to above and below-market leases in which the Company is the lessor are amortized to minimum rents on a straight-line basis over the estimated life of the lease, with amortization as a net increase to minimum rents in the amounts of $9,930, $17,863,$8,971, $7,323, and $809$9,930 for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The above-market lease in which the Company is the lessee is amortized to ground rent expense over the life of the non-cancelable lease term, with amortization as a decrease in the amount of $78 and $75 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (none in 2014).
In-place leases are amortized to depreciation and amortization expense over the life of the leases to which they pertain, with such amortization of $24,269, $43,941,$14,780, $18,457, and $8,094$24,269 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, respectively.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


The table below identifies the types of intangible assets and liabilities, their location on the consolidated balance sheets, their weighted average amortization period, and their book value, which is net of accumulated amortization, as of December 31, 20162018 and 2015:2017:
 Balance as of Balance as of
Intangible
Asset/Liability
 
Location on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets
 Weighted Average Remaining Amortization (in years) December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 Location on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets
 Weighted Average Remaining Amortization (in years) December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
Above-market leases - Company is lessor Deferred costs and other assets 7.3 $34,337
 $47,285
 Deferred costs and other assets 6.9 $18,827
 $24,254
Below-market leases - Company is lessor Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles and deferred revenues 13.5 $104,540
 $131,854
 Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles and deferred revenues 12.6 $66,651
 $77,870
Above-market lease - Company is lessee Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles and deferred revenues 30.5 $2,383
 $2,461
In-place leases Deferred costs and other assets 9.8 $70,907
 $99,836
 Deferred costs and other assets 11.1 $38,453
 $46,627
The future net amortization of intangibles as an increase (decrease) to net income as of December 31, 20162018 is as follows:
 Above/Below-Market Leases-Lessor Above/Below-Market Leases-Lessee In-place Leases Total Net Intangible Amortization Above/Below-Market Leases-Lessor In-place Leases Total Net Intangible Amortization
2017 $5,618
 $78
 $(17,264) $(11,568)
2018 4,868
 78
 (11,364) (6,418)
2019 5,294
 78
 (9,558) (4,186) $4,339
 $(9,203) $(4,864)
2020 5,605
 78
 (7,376) (1,693) 4,606
 (6,965) (2,359)
2021 5,656
 78
 (3,898) 1,836
 4,677
 (3,584) 1,093
2022 4,187
 (2,819) 1,368
2023 3,619
 (2,285) 1,334
Thereafter 43,162
 1,993
 (21,447) 23,708
 26,396
 (13,597) 12,799
 $70,203
 $2,383
 $(70,907) $1,679
 $47,824
 $(38,453) $9,371
Impairment
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company made continued progress to dispose of its remaining noncore properties. On November 10, 2016, the Company sold Richmond Town Square for $7.3 million. Additionally, as of December 31, 2016, we had executed purchase and sale agreements to sell Virginia Center Commons, located in Glen Allen, Virginia for $9.0 million and to sell Gulf View Square, located in Port Richey, Florida and River Oaks Center, located in Chicago, Illinois for $15 million and $27 million, respectively. The Company closed on these transactions during the firstfourth quarter of 2017, (see Note 13 - "Subsequent Events" for further discussion). As such, the Company has classified these enclosed retail properties as held-for-sale as of December 31, 2016. We compared the fair value of each noncore property to its relative carrying value, which resulted in the recording of an impairment charge of approximately $21.9 million within the consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2016. The impairment charge was attributed to the recent continued declines in the fair value of the properties and executed agreements entered into in 2016 to sell these properties at prices below the carrying value.
During the year ended December 31, 2015, we took an impairment charge of approximately $138 million primarily related to the noncore properties noted above, in addition to Forest Mall and Northlake Mall, which were both sold on January 29, 2016, and Knoxville Center, which was sold on August 19, 2016. The impairment charge was due to the change in facts and circumstances when we decided to hold the assets for a shorter period which resulted in the carrying value not being recoverable from the projected cash flows.
During the third quarter of 2015, a major anchor tenant of Chesapeake SquareRushmore Mall informed us of their intention to close their store at the property. The impending closure was deemed a triggering event and, therefore, we evaluated this property in conjunction with our quarterly impairment review and preparation of our financial statements for the quarteryear ended September 30, 2015.December 31, 2017. We compared the estimated fair value of $37.5 million to the related carrying value of $75.0 million, which resulted in the recording of an impairment charge of approximately $37.5 million in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2017.
On November 3, 2017, the Company completed the sale of Colonial Park Mall for $15.0 million. We compared the fair value measurement of the property to the relatedits relative carrying value, which resulted in the recording of an impairment charge of approximately $20.9 million in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2017. The impairment charge was due to the change in facts and circumstances when we decided to hold the asset for a shorter period which resulted in the carrying value not being recoverable from the projected cash flows.
During the first quarter of 2017, the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement to dispose of Morgantown Commons, which was sold in the second quarter of 2017. Earlier in 2017, we shortened the hold period used in assessing impairment for the asset, which resulted in the carrying value not being recoverable from the expected cash flows. The purchase offer represented the best available evidence of fair value for this property. We compared the fair value to the carrying value, which resulted in the recording of an impairment charge of approximately $8.5 million in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2017.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, we recorded an impairment charge of $21.9 million, primarily related to noncore properties consisting of Gulf View Square, Richmond Town Square, River Oaks Center, and Virginia Center Commons. The impairment charge was attributed to the continued declines in the fair value of the properties and executed agreements entered into in 2016 to sell these properties at prices below the carrying value.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


5.Investment in Unconsolidated Entities, at Equity
$9.9The Company's investment activity in unconsolidated real estate entities for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 consisted of investments in the following joint ventures:
The O'Connor Joint Venture I
This investment consists of a 51% noncontrolling interest held by the Company in a portfolio of five enclosed retail properties and related outparcels, consisting of the following: The Mall at Johnson City located in Johnson City, Tennessee; Pearlridge Center located in Aiea, Hawaii; Polaris Fashion Place®; Scottsdale Quarter® located in Scottsdale, Arizona; and Town Center Plaza (which consists of Town Center Plaza and the adjacent Town Center Crossing) located in Leawood, Kansas. We retain management, leasing, and development responsibilities for the O'Connor Joint Venture I.
On April 11, 2018, the O'Connor Joint Venture I closed on the acquisition of the Sears department store located at Polaris Fashion Place® in connection with our acquisition of additional Sears department stores (see Note 4 - "Investment in Real Estate").
On March 2, 2017, the O'Connor Joint Venture I closed on the purchase of Pearlridge Uptown II, an approximately 153,000 square foot (unaudited) wing of Pearlridge Center, for a gross purchase price of $70.0 million.
On March 30, 2017, the O'Connor Joint Venture I closed on a $43.2 million non-recourse mortgage note payable with an eight year term and a fixed interest rate of 4.071% secured by Pearlridge Uptown II. The mortgage note payable requires monthly interest only payments until April 1, 2019, at which time monthly interest and principal payments are due until maturity.
On March 29, 2017, the O'Connor Joint Venture I closed on a $55.0 million non-recourse mortgage note payable with a ten year term and a fixed interest rate of 4.36% secured by sections of Scottsdale Quarter® known as Block K and Block M. The mortgage note payable requires monthly interest only payments until May 1, 2022, at which time monthly interest and principal payments are due until maturity.
The O'Connor Joint Venture II
During the year ended December 31, 2017, we completed an additional joint venture transaction with O'Connor with respect to the ownership and operation of seven of the Company's retail properties and certain related outparcels, consisting of the following: The Arboretum, located in Austin, Texas; Arbor Hills; the Oklahoma City Properties; Gateway Centers, located in Austin, Texas; Malibu Lumber Yard; Palms Crossing I and II, located in McAllen, Texas; and The Shops at Arbor Walk, located in Austin, Texas (the "O'Connor Joint Venture II"). The transaction valued the properties at $598.6 million before closing adjustments and debt assumptions. Under the terms of the joint venture agreement, we retained a non-controlling 51% interest in the O'Connor Joint Venture II and sold the remaining 49% to O'Connor. The transaction generated net proceeds to the Company of approximately $138.9 million, after taking into consideration costs associated with the transaction and the assumption of debt (including the new mortgage loans on The Arboretum, Gateway Centers, and Oklahoma City Properties which closed prior to the joint venture transaction; see Note 6 - "Indebtedness" for net proceeds to the Company from the new mortgage loans), which we used to reduce the Company's debt as well as for general corporate purposes. At the time of closing, we deconsolidated the properties included in the O'Connor Joint Venture II and recorded a gain in connection with this partial sale of $126.1 million, which is included in gain (loss) on disposition of interests in properties, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss)income. The gain was recorded pursuant to ASC 360-20 and calculated based upon proceeds received, less 49% of the book value of the deconsolidated net assets. Our retained 51% non-controlling equity method interest was valued at historical cost based upon the pro rata book value of the retained interest in the net assets. We retain management and leasing responsibilities for the year ended December 31, 2015. Furthermore, we transferred ownership of this property to the mortgage lender on April 28, 2016 (see Note 6 - "Indebtedness").
Condensed Pro Forma Financial Information (Unaudited)
The results of operations of acquired properties are included in the consolidated and combined statements of operations beginning on their respective acquisition dates. The following unaudited condensed pro forma financial information is presented as if the Merger and the Property Sale described in Note 1 - "Organization," which were completed on January 15, 2015, had been consummated on January 1, 2014. The unaudited condensed pro forma financial information assumes the O'Connor Joint Venture II.
In connection with the formation of this joint venture, we recorded transaction completed on June 1, 2015 (see Note 5 - "Investmentcosts of approximately $6.4 million as part of our basis in Unconsolidated Entities, at Equity") also occurred on January 1, 2014. Additionally, adjustments have been made to reflect the following transactions as if they occurred on January 1, 2014: the issuance of the Notes Payable on March 24, 2015 (see Note 6 - "Indebtedness"), the redemption of all 4,700,000 outstanding 8.125% Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock on April 15, 2015 (see Note 9 - "Equity"), the refinancings of property mortgages on May 21, 2015 (see Note 6 - "Indebtedness"), the receipt of funds from the June 2015 Term Loan on June 4, 2015 (see Note 6 - "Indebtedness") and the receipt of funds from the December 2015 Term Loan on December 10, 2015 (see Note 6 - "Indebtedness"). Finally, no pro forma adjustments have been made for the January 13, 2015 acquisition of Canyon View Marketplace, the January 29, 2016 sale of Forest Mall and Northlake Mall, the April 28, 2016 foreclosure of Chesapeake Square, the June 9, 2016 foreclosure of Merritt Square Mall, the August 19, 2016 sale of Knoxville Center, the November 10, 2016 sale of Richmond Town Square, or the December 29, 2016 transition of River Valley Mall because it would not have a significant impact. The unaudited condensed pro forma financial information is for comparative purposes only and not necessarily indicative of what actual results of operations of the Company would have been had the Merger and other transactions noted above been consummated on January 1, 2014, nor does it purport to represent the results of operations for future periods.this investment.
WPG Inc. Condensed Pro Forma Financial Information (Unaudited)
The table below contains information related to the unaudited condensed pro forma financial information of WPG Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 as follows:
  Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
  2015 2014
Total revenues $874,338
 $886,010
Net (loss) income attributable to the Company $(60,876) $74,147
Net (loss) income attributable to common shareholders $(75,024) $60,115
(Loss) earnings per common share-basic and diluted $(0.40) $0.32
Weighted average shares outstanding-basic (in thousands) 185,342
 185,031
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted (in thousands) 219,708
 219,528
WPG L.P. Condensed Pro Forma Financial Information (Unaudited)
The table below contains information related to the unaudited condensed pro forma financial information of WPG L.P. for the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 as follows:
  Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
  2015 2014
Total revenues $874,338
 $886,010
Net (loss) income attributable to unitholders $(74,734) $85,309
Net (loss) income attributable to common unitholders $(88,882) $71,277
(Loss) earnings per common unit-basic and diluted $(0.40) $0.32
Weighted average units outstanding-basic (in thousands) 219,708
 219,402
Weighted average units outstanding-diluted (in thousands) 219,708
 219,528
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


5.    Investment in Unconsolidated Entities, at Equity
The Company's investment activity in unconsolidated real estate entities for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 consisted of investments in the following joint ventures:
The O'Connor Joint Venture
On June 1, 2015, we completed a joint venture transaction with O'Connor, an unaffiliated third party, with respect to the ownership and operation of five of the Company’s enclosed retail properties and certain related out-parcels (the "O'Connor Joint Venture") acquired in the Merger, which were valued at approximately $1.625 billion. We retained a 51% non-controlling interest in the O'Connor Joint Venture. The transaction generated net proceeds, after taking into consideration the assumption of debt (including the new loans on Pearlridge Center and Scottsdale Quarter) and costs associated with the transaction, of approximately $432 million (including $28.7 million for the partial reimbursement of the Scottsdale Quarter development costs), which was used to repay a portion of the Bridge Loan (see Note 6 - "Indebtedness"). We deconsolidated the properties and recorded a gain in connection with this sale of $4.2 million, which is included in (loss) gain upon acquisition of controlling interests and on sale of interests in properties, net in the accompanying consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2015. We retained day to day management, leasing, and development responsibilities for the O'Connor Properties.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the O'Connor Joint Venture sold its 25% indirect ownership interest in Crescent-SDQ III Venture, LLC to unaffiliated third parties. The Company received a cash distribution from the joint venture at closing of $4.4 million and recorded $0.3 million as our share of the joint venture's gain, based on our pro-rata ownership interest in the O'Connor Joint Venture, which is recorded in (loss) income from unconsolidated entities in the accompanying consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
The Seminole Joint Venture
This investment consists of a 45% non-controlling interest held by the Company in Seminole Towne Center, an approximate 1.1 million square foot (unaudited) enclosed regional retail property located in the Orlando, Florida area. The Company's effective financial interest in this property (after preferences) was approximately 22%6.76% for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. We retainedretain day to day management, leasing, and development responsibilities for the Seminole Joint Venture. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company received cash of $0.7 million (after preferences) related to our share of the proceeds from the sale of two outparcels, which was recorded in income (loss) from unconsolidated entities, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.
Other Joint Venture
The Company also holds an indirect 12.5% ownership interest in certain real estate through a joint venture with an unaffiliated third party. We diddo not retainhave management, leasing and development responsibilities for this joint venture.
Individual agreements specify which services the Company is to provide to each joint venture. The Company, through its affiliates, may provide management, development, construction, leasing and legal services for a fee to the joint ventures described above for which we've retained the right to provide such services. Related to performing these services, we recorded management fees of $6.7 million, $3.9 million and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, which are included in other income in the accompanying consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). Advances to the O'Connor Joint Venture I and O'Connor Joint Venture II totaled $2.5$5.2 million and $1.2$4.3 million as of December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, respectively, which are included in investment in and advances to unconsolidated entities, at equity in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Management deems this balance to be collectible and anticipates repayment within one year.
The results for the O'Connor Joint Venture I, Seminole Joint Venture, and our indirect 12.5% ownership interest are included below for all periods presented. The results for the O'Connor Joint Venture II are included below for the year ended December 31, 20162018 and forfrom May 12, 2017 (the closing date of the periodventure), and in the case of Malibu Lumber Yard from June 1, 201513, 2017 (the date the property was contributed to the venture), through December 31, 2015.2017.
The results for the joint venture that previously owned Clay Terrace, located in Carmel, Indiana, are included in the results below for the period from January 1, 2014 through June 19, 2014. On June 20, 2014, the Company purchased the remaining ownership interest in this property from its former joint venture partner. As a result, the Company now owns all of the equity interest in this property, and therefore it is now consolidated.
The results for the joint venture that previously owned seven open-air shopping centers located in various locations are included in the results below for the period from January 1, 2014 through June 17, 2014. On June 18, 2014, the Company purchased a controlling ownership interest in these properties from its former joint venture partner. As a result, the Company now owns essentially all of the equity interest in these properties, and therefore they are now consolidated.
  For the Year Ended December 31,
  2018 2017 2016
Total revenues $264,521
 $236,415
 $191,831
Operating expenses 108,513
 95,603
 78,685
Depreciation and amortization 97,810
 89,397
 78,972
Operating income 58,198
 51,415
 34,174
Gain on sale of interests in property and unconsolidated entities, net 583
 1,585
 1,014
Interest expense, taxes, and other, net (52,477) (45,906) (32,754)
Net income from the Company's unconsolidated real estate entities $6,304
 $7,094
 $2,434
       
Our share of income (loss) from the Company's unconsolidated real estate entities $541
 $1,395
 $(1,745)
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


The results for the joint venture that previously owned Whitehall Mall, located in Whitehall, Pennsylvania, are included in the results below for the period from January 1, 2014 through November 30, 2014. On December 1, 2014, the Company purchased the remaining ownership interest in this property from its former joint venture partner. As a result, the Company now owns all of the equity interest in this property, and therefore it is now consolidated.
The results for the Seminole Joint Venture are included below for all periods presented. The results for the Company's indirect 12.5% ownership interest in another real estate project are included for the year ended December 31, 2016 and for the period from January 15, 2015 through December 31, 2015.
The following table presents the combined balance sheets for the unconsolidated joint venture properties for the periods indicated above during which the Company accounted for these investments as unconsolidated entities as of December 31, 20162018 and 2015:2017:
 December 31, December 31,
 2016 2015 2018 2017
Assets:        
Investment properties at cost, net $1,641,170
 $1,693,769
 $1,964,699
 $1,972,208
Construction in progress 21,084
 55,529
 21,019
 44,817
Cash and cash equivalents 20,657
 28,839
 43,169
 40,955
Tenant receivables and accrued revenue, net 19,056
 29,297
 31,661
 30,866
Deferred costs and other assets (1)
 135,313
 154,406
 147,481
 174,665
Total assets $1,837,280
 $1,961,840
 $2,208,029
 $2,263,511
Liabilities and Members’ Equity:  
  
  
  
Mortgage notes payable $875,811
 $908,315
 $1,292,801
 $1,302,143
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, and deferred revenues(2)
 116,870
 137,613
 137,073
 148,273
Total liabilities 992,681
 1,045,928
 1,429,874
 1,450,416
Members’ equity 844,599
 915,912
 778,155
 813,095
Total liabilities and members’ equity $1,837,280
 $1,961,840
 $2,208,029
 $2,263,511
Our share of members’ equity, net $429,792
 $461,227
 $396,229
 $414,245

(1)Includes value of acquired in-place leases and acquired above-market leases with a net book value of $93,634$91,609 and $113,822$107,869 as of December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, respectively.
(2)Includes the net book value of below market leases of $69,886$57,392 and $86,584$69,269 as of December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, respectively.
The following table presents the investment in and advances to (cash distributions and losses in) unconsolidated real estate entities for the periods indicated above during which the Company accounted for these investments as unconsolidated entities as of December 31, 20162018 and 2015:2017:
 December 31, December 31,
 2016 2015 2018 2017
Our share of members’ equity, net $429,792
 $461,227
 $396,229
 $414,245
Advances and excess investment 13,679
 11,445
 21,557
 22,173
Net investment in and advances to unconsolidated real estate entities(1)
 $443,471
 $472,672
Net investment in and advances to unconsolidated entities, at equity(1)
 $417,786
 $436,418
(1)Includes $458,892$433,207 and $488,071$451,839 of investment in and advances to unconsolidated entities, at equity as of December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, respectively, and $15,421 and $15,399$15,421 of cash distributions and losses in unconsolidated entities, at equity as of December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, respectively.

6.Indebtedness
Mortgage Debt
Total mortgage indebtedness at December 31, 2018 and 2017 was as follows:
  2018 2017
Face amount of mortgage loans $980,276
 $1,152,436
Fair value adjustments, net 5,764
 8,338
Debt issuance cost, net (2,771) (3,692)
Carrying value of mortgage loans $983,269
 $1,157,082
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and Combinedper unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


The mortgage debt had weighted average interest and maturity of 5.00% and 3.5 years at December 31, 2018 and 4.77% and 4.0 years at December 31, 2017.
A roll forward of mortgage indebtedness from December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2018 is summarized as follows:
Balance at December 31, 2017 $1,157,082
Debt amortization payments (18,322)
Repayment of debt (94,838)
Debt borrowings, net of issuance costs 34,782
Debt canceled upon lender foreclosures, net of debt issuance costs (93,988)
Amortization of fair value and other adjustments (2,574)
Amortization of debt issuance costs 1,127
Balance at December 31, 2018 $983,269
2018 Activity
On October 23, 2018, the $94.0 million mortgage on Rushmore Mall was canceled upon a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure agreement (see "Covenants" section below for additional details).
On October 2, 2018, an affiliate of WPG Inc. repaid the $8.3 million mortgage loan on Whitehall Mall, located in Whitehall, Pennsylvania. This repayment was funded by cash on hand.
On September 27, 2018, an affiliate of WPG Inc. closed on a $35.0 million full-recourse mortgage note payable with a three-year term and a fixed rate of 4.48% secured by Southgate Mall. The mortgage note payable requires interest only payments and will initially mature on September 27, 2021, subject to two one-year extensions available at our option subject to compliance with the terms of the underlying loan agreement and payment of customary extension fees. The proceeds were used to reduce corporate debt and for ongoing redevelopment efforts.
On June 8, 2018, the Company exercised the first of three options to extend the maturity date of the $65.0 million term loan secured by Weberstown Mall, located in Stockton, California, for one year. The extended maturity date is June 8, 2019, subject to two one year extensions available at our option subject to compliance with the terms of the underlying loan agreement and payment of customary extension fees.
On January 19, 2018, an affiliate of WPG Inc. repaid the $86.5 million mortgage loan on The Outlet Collection® | Seattle, located in Auburn, Washington. This repayment was funded by borrowings on the Revolver (as defined below).
2017 Activity
On December 29, 2017, an affiliate of WPG Inc. repaid the $11.7 million mortgage loan secured by Henderson Square, located in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. This repayment was funded by cash on hand.
On October 17, 2017, an affiliate of WPG Inc. completed a discounted payoff of the $99.7 million mortgage loan secured by Southern Hills Mall, located in Sioux City, Iowa, for $55.0 million (see "Covenants" section below for additional details).
On October 3, 2017, the $40.0 million mortgage on Valle Vista Mall was canceled upon a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure agreement (see "Covenants" section below for additional details).
On October 2, 2017, an affiliate of WPG Inc. repaid the $99.6 million mortgage loan on WestShore Plaza, located in Tampa, Florida. This repayment was funded by borrowings on the Revolver.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


On May 10, 2017 and prior to the deconsolidation of these properties due to the sale of 49% of our interests (see Note 5 - "Investment in Unconsolidated Entities, at Equity" for further details), the Company closed on non-recourse mortgage loans encumbering The Arboretum, Gateway Centers, and Oklahoma City Properties. The following table summarizes the key terms of each mortgage loan:
Property Principal Debt issuance costs Net debt issuance Interest Rate Maturity Date
The Arboretum $59,400
 $(452) $58,948
 4.13% June 1, 2027
Gateway Centers 112,500
 (709) 111,791
 4.03% June 1, 2027
Oklahoma City Properties 43,279
 (427) 42,852
 3.90% June 1, 2027
Total $215,179
 $(1,588) $213,591
    
The Arboretum and Gateway Centers loans require monthly interest only payments until July 1, 2021, at which time monthly interest and principal payments are due until maturity. The Oklahoma City Properties loan requires monthly interest only payments until July 1, 2022, at which time monthly interest and principal payments are due until maturity. We used the net proceeds to repay a portion of the outstanding balance on the Revolver, as defined below. These three loans were deconsolidated during the year ended December 31, 2017, in connection with the completion of the O'Connor Joint Venture II transaction.
On April 25, 2017, the Company completed a discounted payoff of the $87.3 million mortgage loan secured by Mesa Mall, located in Grand Junction, Colorado, for $63.0 million (see "Covenants" section below for additional details).
Unsecured Debt
On January 22, 2018, WPG L.P. amended and restated $1.0 billion of the existing facility. The recast Facility (as defined below) can be increased to $1.5 billion through currently uncommitted Facility commitments. Excluding the accordion feature, the recast Facility includes a $650.0 million Revolver (as defined below) and $350.0 million Term Loan (as defined below). The $350.0 million Term Loan was fully funded at closing, and the Company used the proceeds to repay the $270.0 million outstanding on the June 2015 Term Loan (as defined below) and to pay down the Revolver.
On August 4, 2017, WPG L.P. completed the issuance of $750.0 million of unsecured notes. The proceeds were used to repay the $500.0 million previously outstanding Term Loan (as defined below) and partial repayment of $230.0 million on the June 2015 Term Loan (as defined below).
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


The following table identifies our total unsecured debt outstanding at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017:
  December 31,
2018
 December 31,
2017
Notes payable:    
Face amount - 3.850% Notes due 2020 (the "Exchange Notes")(1)
 $250,000
 $250,000
Face amount - 5.950% Notes due 2024(2)
 750,000
 750,000
Debt discount, net (9,680) (11,086)
Debt issuance costs, net (7,623) (9,542)
Total carrying value of notes payable $982,697
 $979,372
     
Unsecured term loans:(8)
    
Face amount - Term Loan(3)(4)
 $350,000
 $
Face amount - December 2015 Term Loan(5)
 340,000
 340,000
Face amount - June 2015 Term Loan(6)
 
 270,000
Debt issuance costs, net (4,491) (3,305)
Total carrying value of unsecured term loans $685,509
 $606,695
     
Revolving credit facility:(3)(7)
    
Face amount $290,000
 $155,000
Debt issuance costs, net (3,998) (540)
Total carrying value of revolving credit facility $286,002
 $154,460
(1)The Exchange Notes were issued at a 0.028% discount, bear interest at 3.850% per annum and mature on April 1, 2020.
(2)The 5.950% Notes due 2024 were issued at a 1.533% discount, bear interest at 5.950% per annum, and mature on August 15, 2024. The interest rate could vary in the future based upon changes to the Company's credit ratings (see Note 13 - "Subsequent Events").
(3)The unsecured revolving credit facility, or "Revolver" and unsecured term loan, or "Term Loan" are collectively known as the "Facility."
(4)The Term Loan bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 1.45% per annum and will mature on December 30, 2022. We had interest rate swap agreements totaling $270.0 million, which effectively fixed the interest rate on a portion of the Term Loan at 2.56% per annum through June 30, 2018. On May 9, 2018, we executed swap agreements totaling $250.0 million to replace matured swap agreements, which effectively fix the interest rate on a portion of the Term Loan at 4.21% through June 30, 2021. At December 31, 2018, the applicable interest rate on the unhedged portion of the Term Loan was one-month LIBOR plus 1.45% or 3.95%.
(5)The December 2015 Term Loan bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 1.80% per annum and will mature on January 10, 2023. We have interest rate swap agreements totaling $340.0 million, which effectively fix the interest rate at 3.51% per annum through maturity.
(6)The June 2015 Term Loan bore interest at one-month LIBOR plus 1.45% per annum. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company repaid $230.0 million of the June 2015 Term Loan and wrote off $0.9 million of debt issuance costs. On January 22, 2018, the Company repaid the remaining $270.0 million outstanding with proceeds from the amended and restated Facility (as discussed above) and wrote off $0.5 million of debt issuance costs.
(7)As of December 31, 2017, the Revolver provided borrowings on a revolving basis up to $900.0 million, bore interest at one-month LIBOR plus 1.25%, and was initially scheduled to mature on May 30, 2018. On January 22, 2018, we amended the terms of the Revolver to provide borrowings on a revolving basis up to $650.0 million at one-month LIBOR plus 1.25%. Under the amended terms, the Revolver will mature on December 30, 2021, subject to two six month extensions available at our option subject to compliance with terms of the Facility and payment of a customary extension fee. Upon the amended terms, the Company wrote off $0.3 million of debt issuance costs. At December 31, 2018, we had an aggregate available borrowing capacity of $359.8 million under the Revolver, net of $0.2 million reserved for outstanding letters of credit. At December 31, 2018, the applicable interest rate on the Revolver was one-month LIBOR plus 1.25%, or 3.75% (see Note 13 - "Subsequent Events").
(8) While we have interest rate swap agreements in place that fix the LIBOR portion of the rates as noted above, the spread over LIBOR could vary in the future based upon changes to the Company's credit ratings (see Note 13 - "Subsequent Events").
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


The following table presents the combined statements of operations forborrowings and paydowns on the unconsolidated joint venture properties for the periods indicated aboveRevolver during which the Company accounted for these investments as unconsolidated entities for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018 and 2014:December 31, 2017:
  For the Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
Total revenues $191,831
 $127,263
 $41,248
Operating expenses 78,685
 53,204
 15,291
Depreciation and amortization 78,972
 48,876
 9,649
Operating income 34,174
 25,183
 16,308
Gain on sale of interests in unconsolidated entities 1,014
 
 
Interest expense, taxes, and other, net (32,754) (20,135) (8,936)
Net income from the Company's unconsolidated real estate entities $2,434
 $5,048
 $7,372
       
Our share of (loss) income from the Company's unconsolidated real estate entities $(1,745) $(1,247) $973
  2018 2017
Beginning Balance $155,000
 $308,000
Borrowings 332,000
 350,000
Paydowns (197,000) (503,000)
Ending Balance $290,000
 $155,000

6.    Indebtedness
Mortgage Debt
Total mortgage indebtedness at December 31, 2016 and 2015 was as follows:
  2016 2015
Face amount of mortgage loans $1,610,429
 $1,782,103
Fair value adjustments, net 12,661
 17,683
Debt issuance cost, net (5,010) (6,347)
Carrying value of mortgage loans $1,618,080
 $1,793,439
A roll forward of mortgage indebtedness from December 31, 2015 to December 31, 2016 is summarized as follows:
Balance at December 31, 2015 $1,793,439
Debt amortization payments (16,526)
Debt borrowings, net 4,530
Debt cancelled upon lender foreclosures, net of debt issuance costs of $0.3 million (159,828)
Amortization of fair value and other adjustments (5,022)
Amortization of debt issuance costs 1,487
Balance at December 31, 2016 $1,618,080
The mortgage debt had weighted average interest and maturity of 4.98% and 4.0 years at December 31, 2016 and 5.10% and 4.4 years at December 31, 2015. See "Covenants" section below for a discussion on mortgage loans in default at December 31, 2016.
2016 Activity
On December 29, 2016, the mortgage on River Valley Mall was cancelled upon a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure agreement (see "Covenants" section below for additional details).
On October 1, 2016, the Company exercised the last option to extend the maturity date of the principal amount of the mortgage loan on WestShore Plaza for one year to October 1, 2017.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


On June 9, 2016, the mortgage on Merritt Square Mall was cancelled upon the lender foreclosure (see "Covenants" section below for additional details).
On June 8, 2016, the Company borrowed $65.0 millionDuring 2018, borrowings under a term loan secured by ownership interests in Weberstown Mall, located in Stockton, California (the "June 2016 Secured Loan"). The June 2016 Secured Loan bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 1.75% and will initially mature on June 8, 2018, subject to three one-year extensions available at our option subject to compliance with the terms of the underlying loan agreement and payment of customary extension fees. The interest rate on the June 2016 Secured Loan may vary in the future based on the Company's credit rating. The Company used the proceeds from the June 2016 Secured Loan to repay the $60.0 million mortgage loan secured by Weberstown Mall and for other general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2016, the balance was $64.6 million, net of $0.4 million of debt issuance costs, and the applicable interest rate was 2.5%.
On April 28, 2016, the mortgage on Chesapeake Square was cancelled upon the lender foreclosure (see "Covenants" section below for additional details).
2015 Activity
On December 30, 2015, the Company executed an amendment to the loan on Henderson Square. The amendment extended the call date, upon which the lender can make the loan due and payable, to January 1, 2018. Effective January 1, 2016, the fixed interest rate decreased from 4.43% to 3.17%.
On October 1, 2015, the Company exercised the first of two options to extend the maturity date of the mortgage loan on WestShore Plaza for one year to October 1, 2016.
On July 31, 2015, the Company repaid the $115.0 million mortgage on Clay Terrace and, on August 3, 2015, the Company repaid the $24.5 million mortgage on Bloomingdale Court. The repayments were funded with an additional borrowing on the Revolver (defined below).
On June 30, 2015, we repaid the $20.0 million mezzanine loan on WestShore Plaza through a borrowing on the Revolver (defined below).
On June 1, 2015, we deconsolidated the O'Connor Properties (see Note 5 - "Investment in Unconsolidated Entities, at Equity"), thereby transferring $795.7 million of mortgages to unconsolidated entities.
On May 21, 2015, we refinanced Pearlridge Center’s existing $171.0 million mortgage maturing in 2015 with a new $225.0 million non-recourse, interest-only loan with a 10-year term and a fixed interest rate of 3.53%. We also refinanced existing debt totaling $195.0 million on Scottsdale Quarter® maturing in 2015 with a new $165.0 million non-recourse, interest-only loan with a 10-year term and a fixed interest rate of 3.53%. We used $21.2 million of the net proceeds from the refinancings to repay a portion of the outstanding balance on the Bridge Loan (defined below).
On March 27, 2015, the Company repaid the $18.8 million mortgage on West Town Corners and the $13.9 million mortgage on Gaitway Plaza with cash on hand.
On January 15, 2015, resulting from the Merger, we assumed additional mortgages with a fair value of approximately $1.4 billion on 14 properties.
On January 13, 2015, resulting from our acquisition of Canyon View Marketplace (see Note 4 - "Investment in Real Estate"), we assumed an additional mortgage with a fair value of $6.4 million.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


Unsecured Debt
The Facility
On May 15, 2014, we closed on a senior unsecured revolving credit facility, or "Revolver," and a senior unsecured term loan, or "Term Loan" (collectively referred to as the "Facility"). The Revolver provides borrowings on a revolving basis up to $900 million, bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 1.25%, and will initially mature on May 30, 2018, subject to two, six-month extensions available at our option subject to compliance with the terms of the Facility and payment of a customary extension fee. The Term Loan provides borrowings in an aggregate principal amount up to $500 million, bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 1.45%, and will initially mature on May 30, 2017, subject to two, 12-month extensions available at our option subject to compliance with the terms of the Facility and payment of a customary extension fee (see Note 13 - "Subsequent Events"). On July 6, 2016, the Company exercised interest rate swap agreements totaling $200.0 million, which effectively fixed the interest rate on a portion of the Term Loan at 2.04% through August 1, 2018. The interest rate on the Facility may vary in the future based on the Company's credit rating.
During 2016, we incurred $142.3 million of indebtedness under the Facility, the proceeds of which were primarily used for general corporate purposes. During 2016, we repaid $113.0 millionPaydowns of outstanding borrowings on the Facilitywere funded using proceeds from property dispositions (see Note 4 - "Investment in Real Estate"), new mortgage activity as discussed above and cash flow from operations.
During 2015, we incurred $175.0 million of indebtedness2017, borrowings under the Facility, the proceeds of whichRevolver were primarily used for the repayment of the Clay Terrace mortgage, the Bloomington Court mortgage and the WestShore Plaza mezzanine loan (see above), and for general corporate purposes. During 2015, we repaid $310.0 millionPaydowns of the outstanding borrowings on the Facilitywere funded using proceeds from the December 2015 Term Loan (defined below).
At December 31, 2016, borrowings under the Facility consisted of $308.0 million outstanding under the Revolver (before debt issuance costs, net of $1.8 million) and $500.0 million outstanding under the Term Loan. On December 31, 2016, we had an aggregate available borrowing capacity of $591.7 million under the Facility, net of $0.3 million reserved for outstanding letters of credit. At December 31, 2016, the applicable interest rate on the Revolver was one-month LIBOR plus 1.25%, or 2.02%, and the applicable interest rate on the unhedged portion of the Term Loan was one-month LIBOR plus 1.45%, or 2.22%.
Term Loans
On December 10, 2015, the Company borrowed $340.0 million under an additional new term loan (the "December 2015 Term Loan"property dispositions (see Note 4 - "Investment in Real Estate"), pursuantthe O'Connor Joint Venture II transaction (see Note 5 - "Investment in Unconsolidated Entities, at Equity"), including certain mortgage notes executed prior to a commitment receivedthe deconsolidation, and cash flow from bank lenders. The December 2015 Term Loan bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 1.80% and will mature in January 2023. On December 11, 2015, the Company executed interest rate swap agreements totaling $340.0 million which effectively fixed the interest rate on the December 2015 Term Loan at 3.51% through January 2023. The interest rate on the December 2015 Term Loan may vary in the future based on the Company's credit rating. The Company used the proceeds from the December 2015 Term Loan to repay outstanding amounts on the Revolver and for other general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2016, the balance was $336.9 million, net of $3.1 million of debt issuance costs.
On June 4, 2015, the Company borrowed $500.0 million under a new term loan (the "June 2015 Term Loan"), pursuant to a commitment received from bank lenders. The June 2015 Term Loan bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 1.45% and will mature in March 2020. On June 19, 2015, the Company executed interest rate swap agreements totaling $500.0 million, with an effective date of July 6, 2015, which effectively fixed the interest rate on the June 2015 Term Loan at 2.56% through June 2018. The interest rate on the June 2015 Term Loan may vary in the future based on the Company's credit rating. The Company used the proceeds from the June 2015 Term Loan to repay the remaining outstanding balance on the Bridge Loan (defined below). As of December 31, 2016, the balance was $497.6 million, net of $2.4 million of debt issuance costs.
Bridge Loan
On September 16, 2014, in connection with the execution of the Merger Agreement, WPG entered into a debt commitment letter, which was amended and restated on September 23, 2014 pursuant to which parties agreed to provide up to $1.25 billion in a senior unsecured bridge loan facility (the “Bridge Loan”). The Bridge Loan had a maturity date of January 14, 2016, the date that was 364 days following the closing date of the Merger.
On January 15, 2015, the Company borrowed $1.19 billion under the Bridge Loan in connection with the closing of the Merger, which was repaid in full during 2015.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


The Company incurred $10.4 million of Bridge Loan commitment, structuring and funding fees. Upon the full repayment of the Bridge Loan, the Company accelerated amortization of the deferred loan costs, resulting in total amortization of $10.4 million included in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Notes Payable
On March 24, 2015, WPG L.P. closed on a private placement of $250.0 million of 3.850% senior unsecured notes (the "Notes Payable") at a 0.028% discount due April 1, 2020. WPG L.P. received net proceeds from the offering of $248.4 million, which it used to repay a portion of outstanding borrowings under the Bridge Loan. The Notes Payable contain certain customary covenants and events of default which, if any such event of default occurs, would permit or require the principal, premium, if any, and accrued and unpaid interest on all of the then-outstanding Notes Payable to be declared immediately due and payable (subject in certain cases to customary grace and cure periods).
On October 21, 2015, WPG L.P. completed an offer to exchange (the "Exchange Offer") up to $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes Payable for a like principal amount of its 3.850% senior unsecured notes that have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Exchange Notes").  On October 21, 2015, $250.0 million of Exchange Notes were issued in exchange for $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes Payable that were tendered in the Exchange Offer.
As of December 31, 2016, the balance outstanding under the Exchange Notes was $247.6 million, net of $2.4 million of debt discount and issuance costs.operations.
Covenants
Our unsecured debt agreements contain financial and other covenants. If we were to fail to comply with these covenants, after the expiration of the applicable cure periods, the debt maturity could be accelerated or other remedies could be sought by the lender including adjustments to the applicable interest rate. As of December 31, 2016,2018, management believes the Company is in compliance with all covenants of its unsecured debt.
The total balance of mortgages was approximately $1.6 billion$980.3 million as of December 31, 2016.2018. At December 31, 2016,2018, certain of our consolidated subsidiaries were the borrowers under 3021 non-recourse loans one-full recourse loan and one partial-recourse loantwo full-recourse loans secured by mortgages encumbering 3626 properties, including twoone separate poolspool of cross-defaulted and cross-collateralized mortgages encumbering a total of sixfour properties. Under these cross-default provisions, a default under any mortgage included in the cross-defaulted pool may constitute a default under all mortgages within that pool and may lead to acceleration of the indebtedness due on each property within the pool. Certain of our secured debt instruments contain financial and other non-financial covenants which are specific to the properties which serve as collateral for that debt. Our existing non-recourse mortgage loans generally prohibit our subsidiaries that are borrowers thereunder from incurring additional indebtedness, subject to certain customary and limited exceptions. In addition, certain of these instruments limit the ability of the applicable borrower's parent entity from incurring mezzanine indebtedness unless certain conditions are satisfied, including compliance with maximum loan to value ratio and minimum debt service coverage ratio tests. Further, under certain of these existing agreements, if certain cash flow levels in respect of the applicable mortgaged property (as described in the applicable agreement) are not maintained for at least two consecutive quarters, the lender could accelerate the debt and enforce its right against its collateral. If the borrower fails to comply with these covenants, the lender could accelerate the debt and enforce its right against their collateral.
On November 19, 2018, we received a notice of default letter, dated November 15, 2018, from the special servicer to the borrower, a consolidated subsidiary of WPG L.P., concerning the $49.9 million mortgage loan secured by West Ridge Mall and West Ridge Plaza, located in Topeka, Kansas (collectively known as "West Ridge"). The notice was issued by the special servicer because the borrower did not make certain reserve payments or deposits as required by the loan agreement for the aforementioned loan. The borrower has initiated discussions with the special servicer regarding this non-recourse loan and is considering various options. The Company will continue to manage and lease the property.
On May 29, 2018, we received a notice of default letter, dated May 25, 2018, from the special servicer to the borrower, a consolidated subsidiary of WPG L.P., concerning the $94.0 million mortgage loan secured by Rushmore Mall ("Rushmore"). The notice was issued by the special servicer because the borrower notified the lender that there were insufficient funds to ensure future compliance with the mortgage loan due to the loss of certain tenants at Rushmore. On October 23, 2018, an affiliate of the Company transitioned the property to the lender.
On April 11, 2018, we received a notice of default letter, dated April 6, 2018, from the special servicer to the borrower, a consolidated subsidiary of WPG L.P., concerning the $45.2 million mortgage loan secured by Towne West Square, located in Wichita, Kansas. The notice was issued by the special servicer because the borrower did not make certain reserve payments or deposits as required by the loan agreement for the aforementioned loan. On August 24, 2018, we received notification that a receiver had been appointed to manage and lease the property. An affiliate of the Company still holds title to the property.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


On March 30, 2017, the Company transferred the $40.0 million mortgage loan secured by Valle Vista Mall to the special servicer at the request of the borrower, a consolidated subsidiary of the Company. On May 18, 2017, we received a notice of default letter, dated that same date, from the special servicer because the borrower did not repay the loan in full by its May 10, 2017 maturity date. On October 3, 2017, an affiliate of WPG Inc. transitioned the property to the lender.
On June 6, 2016, we received a notice of default letter, dated June 3, 2016, from the special servicer to the borrower of the $99.7 million mortgage loan secured by Southern Hills Mall.  The letter was sent because the borrower, a consolidated subsidiary of the Company, did not repay the loan in full by its June 1, 2016 maturity date.  On October 27, 2016, we received notification that a receiver has been appointed to manage and lease the property. On October 17, 2017, an affiliate of WPG Inc. completed a discounted payoff of the mortgage loan for $55.0 million and retained ownership and management of the property.
On June 30, 2016, we received a notice, dated that same date, that the $87.3 million mortgage loan secured by Mesa Mall had been transferred to the special servicer due to the payment default that occurred when the borrower, a consolidated subsidiary of the Company, did not repay the loan in full by its June 1, 2016 maturity date. The borrower has initiated discussions withOn April 25, 2017, the special servicer regarding this non-recourse loan and is considering various options including restructuring, extending and other options, including transitioning the property to the lender.
On June 6, 2016, we receivedCompany completed a notice of default letter, dated June 3, 2016, from the special servicer to the borrowerdiscounted payoff of the $101.5 million mortgage loan secured by Southern Hills Mall.  The letter was sent because the borrower, a consolidated subsidiaryfor $63.0 million and retained ownership and management of the Company, did not repay the loan in full by its June 1, 2016 maturity date.  On October 27, 2016, we received notification that a receiver has been appointed to manage and lease the property.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


On August 8, 2016, we received a notice of default letter, dated August 4, 2016, from the special servicer to the borrower concerning the $44.9 million mortgage loan secured by River Valley Mall. The letter was sent because the borrower, a consolidated subsidiary of the Company, did not repay the loan in full by its January 11, 2016 maturity date. On December 29, 2016, we transferred title of the property to the mortgage lender pursuant to the terms of a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure agreement entered into by the Company's affiliate and the mortgage lender.
On October 8, 2015, we received a notice of default letter, dated October 5, 2015, from the special servicer to the borrower of the $52.9 million mortgage loan secured by Merritt Square Mall.  The letter was sent because the borrower, a consolidated subsidiary of the Company, did not repay the loan in full by its September 1, 2015 maturity date. On May 25, 2016, the trustee on behalf of the mortgage lender conducted a non-judicial foreclosure sale of Merritt Square Mall, in which the Company's affiliate previously held a 100% ownership interest. The mortgage lender was the successful bidder at the sale and ownership transferred on June 9, 2016. The Company managed the property through and including July 31, 2016.
On October 30, 2015, we received a notice of default letter, dated that same date, from the special servicer to the borrower concerning the $62.4 million mortgage loan that matures on February 1, 2017 and was secured by Chesapeake Square.  The default resulted from an operating cash flow shortfall at the property in October 2015 that the borrower, a consolidated subsidiary of the Company, did not cure. On April 21, 2016, the trustee on behalf of the mortgage lender conducted a non-judicial foreclosure of Chesapeake Square, in which the Company's affiliate previously held majority ownership interest. The mortgage lender was the successful bidder at the sale and ownership transferred on April 28, 2016.
Upon the ownership transfers of River Valley Mall, Merritt Square Mall, and Chesapeake Square, the Company recognized a net gain of $34.6 million based on the cancellation of outstanding mortgage debt of $160.1 million, which is included in gain on extinguishment of debt, net in the consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2016.
At December 31, 2016,2018, management believes the applicable borrowers under our other non-recourse mortgage loans were in compliance with all covenants where non-compliance could individually, or giving effect to applicable cross-default provisions in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. In addition to the properties mentioned above, we have identified Valle Vista Mall as over-levered. We expect to commence discussions with the special servicer on the loan encumbering this property prior to loan maturity. The Company has assessed each of thesethe defaulted properties for impairment indicators and hashave concluded no impairment charges arewere warranted as of December 31, 2016.2018.
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt, Net
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recognized a net gain of $51.4 million related to the $94.0 million mortgage debt cancellation and ownership transfer of Rushmore Mall, which is included in gain on extinguishment of debt, net in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the year then ended.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recognized a net gain of $90.6 million based on the cancellation of mortgage debt of $108.9 million related to discounted payoff of the mortgage note payable secured by Southern Hills Mall, ownership transfer of Valle Vista Mall, and discounted payoff of the mortgage note payable secured by Mesa Mall, which is included in gain on extinguishment of debt, net in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the year then ended.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized a net gain of $34.6 million related to the $160.1 million mortgage debt cancellation and ownership transfers of River Valley Mall, Merritt Square Mall, and Chesapeake Square, which is included in gain on extinguishment of debt, net in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the year then ended.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


Debt Maturity and Cash Paid for Interest
Scheduled principal repayments on indebtedness (including extension options) as of December 31, 20162018 are as follows:
2017 $346,050
2018 39,032
2019 968,309
 $64,281
2020 846,710
 344,584
2021 273,354
 320,513
2022 771,856
2023 404,121
Thereafter 1,034,974
 1,054,921
Total principal maturities 3,508,429
 2,960,276
Bond Discount (47) (9,680)
Fair value adjustments, net 12,661
 5,764
Debt issuance costs, net (14,639) (18,883)
Total mortgages and unsecured indebtedness $3,506,404
 $2,937,477
Cash paid for interest for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 2015was $141,641, $107,609 and 2014 was $125,999, $124,646 and $81,607, respectively.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


Fair Value of Debt
The carrying values of our variable-rate loans approximate their fair values. We estimate the fair values of fixed-rate mortgages and fixed ratefixed-rate unsecured debt (including variable-rate unsecured debt swapped to fixed-rate) using cash flows discounted at current borrowing rates.rates or Level 2 inputs. We estimate the fair values of consolidated fixed-rate unsecured notes payable using quoted market prices, or, if no quoted market prices are available, we use quoted market prices for securities with similar terms and maturities or Level 1 inputs. The book value and fair value of these financial instruments along with the related discount rate assumptions as of December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 are summarized as follows:
 2016 2015 2018 2017
Book value of fixed- rate mortgages(1)
 $1,359,329
 $1,596,003
 $915,276
 $1,000,936
Fair value of fixed-rate mortgages $1,403,103
 $1,675,035
 $928,129
 $1,024,890
Weighted average discount rates assumed in calculation of fair value for fixed-rate mortgages 3.79% 3.42% 4.57% 4.19%
        
Book value of fixed-rate unsecured debt(1)
 $1,290,000
 $1,090,000
 $1,590,000
 $1,610,000
Fair value of fixed-rate unsecured debt $1,261,858
 $1,068,724
 $1,485,672
 $1,616,810
Weighted average discount rates assumed in calculation of fair value for fixed-rate unsecured debt 2.86% 1.91% 5.62% 4.27%
(1) Excludes deferred financing fees and applicable debt discounts.
7.    Derivative Financial Instruments
7.Derivative Financial Instruments
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
The Company is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk, primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its debt funding and through the use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, the Company enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the payment of future uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. The Company's derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the Company's known or expected cash payments related to the Company's borrowings.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
The Company's objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish these objectives, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps or caps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. The Company may also enter into forward starting swaps or treasury lock agreements to set the effective interest rate on a planned fixed-rate financing. In a forward starting swap or treasury lock agreement that the Company cash settles in anticipation of a fixed rate financing or refinancing, the Company will receive or pay an amount equal to the present value of future cash flow payments based on the difference between the contract rate and market rate on the settlement date. On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2017-12, as permitted under the standard (see Note 3 - "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" for additional details).
The effective portion of changes in the fair value ofFor derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk, the gain or loss on the derivative is recorded in other comprehensive income ("OCI") or other comprehensive loss (“OCL”) and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. Net realized gains or losses resulting from derivatives that were settled in conjunction with planned fixed-rate financings or refinancings continue to be included in accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI") during the term of the hedged debt transaction. Any ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. The Company recognized $288 and $193 of hedge ineffectiveness as increases to earnings during the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. There was no hedge ineffectiveness in earnings during the year ended December 31, 2014.
Amounts reported in AOCI relate to derivatives that will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Company's variable-rate debt. Realized gains or losses on settled derivative instruments included in AOCLAOCI are recognized as an adjustment to income over the term of the hedged debt transaction. During the next twelve months, the Company estimates that an additional $2.4 million will be reclassified as an increasea decrease to interest expense.
Washington Prime Group Inc.On August 4, 2017, the Company terminated six interest rate derivatives and Washington Prime Group, L.P.partially terminated one interest rate derivative with an aggregate notional amount of $430,000, upon the repayment of the Term Loan and partial repayment of the June 2015 Term Loan, receiving cash proceeds of approximately $2.0 million upon settlement.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


During the year ended December 31, 2016,On May 9, 2018, the Company entered into three two-yearfour three-year swaps, and one interest rate cap.totaling $250.0 million with an effective date of June 29, 2018, to replace two three-year swaps totaling $270.0 million, which matured on June 30, 2018. As of December 31, 2016,2018, the Company had 1510 outstanding interest rate derivatives that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk with a notional value of $1,139,600.$590,000.
The table below presents the fair value of the Company's derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 20162018 and 2015:2017:
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Balance Sheet
Location
 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:Balance Sheet
Location
 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
Interest rate productsAsset DerivativesDeferred costs and other assets $5,754
 $1,658
Asset DerivativesDeferred costs and other assets $9,306
 $7,413
Interest rate productsLiability DerivativesAccounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles and deferred revenues $2
 $152
Liability DerivativesAccounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles and deferred revenues $1,913
 $
The asset derivative instruments were reported at their fair value of $5,754$9,306 and $1,658$7,413 in deferred costs and other assets at December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, respectively, with a corresponding adjustment to OCI for the unrealized gains and losses (net of noncontrolling interest allocation). The liability derivative instruments were reported at their fair value of $2$1,913 and $152$0 in accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, and deferred revenues at December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, respectively, with a corresponding adjustment to OCL for the unrealized gains and losses (net of noncontrolling interest allocation). There were no outstanding derivatives as of December 31, 2014. Over time, the unrealized gains and losses held in AOCI will be reclassified to earnings. This reclassification will correlate with the recognition of the hedged interest payments in earnings.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


The table below presents the effect of the Company's derivative financial instruments on the consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 20162018, 2017 and 2015:2016:
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion)Location of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion)Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
  Year Ended   Year Ended   Year Ended
  December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015   December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015   December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
           
Interest rate products $(3,580) $(429) Interest expense $7,381
 $2,466
 Interest expense $288
 $193
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
(Interest rate products)
 Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives For the Year Ended December 31,
  2018 2017 2016
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative   $1,054
 $1,256
 $(3,580)
         
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income Interest expense $(2,338) $1,145
 $7,381
         
The table below presents the effect of the Company's derivative financial instruments on the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:
Effect of Cash Flow Hedges on Consolidated Statements of Operations For the year ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
Total interest (expense) presented in the consolidated statements of operations in which the effects of cash flow hedges are recorded $(141,987) $(126,541) $(136,225)
       
Amount of (gain) loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense $(2,338) $1,145
 $7,381
       
Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features
The Company has agreements with each of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision that if the Company either defaults or is capable of being declared in default on any of its consolidated indebtedness, then the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations.
The Company has agreements with its derivative counterparties that incorporate the loan covenant provisions of the Company's indebtedness with a lender affiliate of the derivative counterparty. Failure to comply with the loan covenant provisions would result in the Company being in default on any derivative instrument obligations covered by the agreement.
As of December 31, 2016,2018, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position, plus accrued interest but excluding any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was $189.$1,913. As of December 31, 2016,2018, the Company has not posted any collateral related to these agreements. The Company is not in default with any of these provisions. If the Company had breached any of these provisions at December 31, 2016,2018, it would have been required to settle its obligationsobligation under thethese agreements at their termination value of $189.$1,913.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


Fair Value Considerations
Currently, the Company uses interest rate swaps and caps to manage its interest rate risk. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves, foreign exchange rates, and implied volatilities. Based on these inputs the Company has determined that its interest rate swap and cap valuations are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
To comply with the provisions of Topic 820, the Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty's nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.
Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as of December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


The tables below presents the Company’s net assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall:
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Balance at December 31, 2016
Derivative instruments, net$
 $5,752
 $
 $5,752
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Liabilities
(Level 1)
 Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level
 3)
 Balance at December 31, 2018
Derivative instruments, net$
 $7,393
 $
 $7,393
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Balance at December 31, 2015
Derivative instruments, net$
 $1,506
 $
 $1,506
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Liabilities
(Level 1)
 Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level
 3)
 Balance at December 31, 2017
Derivative instruments, net$
 $7,413
 $
 $7,413

8.    Rentals under Operating Leases
8.Rentals under Operating Leases
Future minimum rentals to be received under non-cancelable operating leases for each of the next five years and thereafter, excluding tenant reimbursements of operating expenses and percentage rent based on tenant sales volume, as of December 31, 20162018 are as follows:
2017 $488,504
2018 418,114
2019 346,428
 $401,604
2020 278,289
 336,602
2021 214,961
 270,936
2022 222,569
2023 175,206
Thereafter 584,446
 423,765
 $2,330,742
 $1,830,682
9.Equity
Preferred Stock
Series H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
On January 15, 2015, WPG Inc. issued 4,000,000 shares of 7.5% Series H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the "Series H Preferred Shares") to convert the preferred stock of GRT outstanding at the time of merger. Dividends accrue quarterly at an annual rate of 7.5% per share. WPG Inc. can redeem this series, in whole or in part, at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends. WPG L.P. issued to WPG Inc. a like number of preferred units as consideration for the Series H Preferred Shares and can redeem this series, in whole or in part, when WPG Inc. can redeem the Series H Preferred Shares at like terms. All shares remain issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
On January 15, 2015, WPG Inc. issued 3,800,000 shares of 6.875% Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the "Series I Preferred Shares") to convert the preferred stock of GRT outstanding at the time of merger. Dividends accrue quarterly at an annual rate of 6.875% per share. WPG Inc. can redeem this series, in whole or in part, at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends. WPG L.P. issued to WPG Inc. a like number of preferred units as consideration for the Series I Preferred Shares and can redeem this series, in whole or in part, when WPG Inc. can redeem the Series I Preferred Shares at like terms. All shares remain issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


9.    Equity
The Separation
Prior to the May 28, 2014 separation, the financial statements were carved-out from SPG's books and records; thus, pre-separation ownership was solely that of SPG and noncontrolling interests based on their respective ownership interest in SPG L.P. on the date of separation (see Note 1 - "Organization" and Note 2 - "Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation and Combination" for more information). Upon becoming a separate company on May 28, 2014, WPG Inc.'s ownership is now classified under the typical stockholders' equity classifications of common stock, capital in excess of par value and retained earnings, while WPG L.P.'s ownership has always been reflected under typical partnership classifications. Related to the separation, 155,162,597 shares of WPG Inc. common stock were issued to shareholders of SPG, with a like number of common units issued by WPG L.P. to WPG Inc. as consideration for the common shares issued, and 31,575,487 units of WPG L.P. common units were issued to limited partners of SPG L.P.
The Merger
Related to the Merger completed on January 15, 2015, WPG Inc. issued 29,942,877 common shares, 4,700,000 shares of 8.125% Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the "Series G Preferred Shares"), 4,000,000 shares of 7.5% Series H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the "Series H Preferred Shares") and 3,800,000 shares of 6.875% Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the "Series I Preferred Shares"), and WPG L.P. issued to WPG Inc. a like number of common and preferred units as consideration for the common and preferred shares issued. Additionally, WPG L.P. issued to limited partners 1,621,695 common units and 130,592 WPG L.P. 7.3% Series I‑1 Preferred Units (the "Series I-1 Preferred Units"). The preferred shares and units were issued as consideration for similarly-named preferred interests of GRT that were outstanding at the Merger date.
On April 15, 2015, WPG Inc. redeemed all of the 4,700,000 issued and outstanding Series G Preferred Shares, resulting in WPG L.P. redeeming a like number of preferred units under terms identical to those of the Series G Preferred Shares described below. The Series G Preferred Shares were redeemed at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid distributions up to, but excluding, the redemption date, in an amount equal to $0.5868 per share, for a total payment of $25.5868 per share. This redemption amount includes the first quarter dividend of $0.5078 per share that was declared on February 24, 2015 to holders of record of such Series G Preferred Shares on March 31, 2015. Because the redemption of the Series G Preferred Shares was a redemption in full, trading of the Series G Preferred Shares on the NYSE ceased after the redemption date. The aggregate amount paid to effect the redemptions of the Series G Preferred Shares was approximately $120.3 million, which was funded with cash on hand.
Exchange Rights
Subject to the terms of the limited partnership agreement of WPG L.P., limited partners in WPG L.P. have, at their option, the right to exchange all or any portion of their units for shares of WPG Inc. common stock on a one‑for‑one basis or cash, as determined by WPG Inc. Therefore, the common units held by limited partners are considered by WPG Inc. to be share equivalents and classified as noncontrolling interests within permanent equity, and classified by WPG L.P. as permanent equity. The amount of cash to be paid if the exchange right is exercised and the cash option is selected will be based on the market value of WPG Inc.'s common stock as determined pursuant to the terms of the WPG L.P. Partnership Agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2017, WPG Inc. issued 314,577 shares of common stock to a limited partner of WPG L.P. in exchange for an equal number of units pursuant to the WPG L.P. Partnership Agreement. This transaction increased WPG Inc.’s ownership interest in WPG L.P. There were no similar transactions during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2016. At December 31, 2016,2018, WPG Inc. had reserved 35,127,73534,755,660 shares of common stock for possible issuance upon the exchange of units held by limited partners.
The holders of the Series I-1 Preferred Units have, at their option, the right to have their units purchased by WPG L.P. subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. Therefore, the Series I-1 Preferred Units are classified as redeemable noncontrolling interests outside of permanent equity.
Share Based Compensation
On May 28, 2014, the Board adopted the Washington Prime Group, L.P. 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), which permits the Company to grant awards to current and prospective directors, officers, employees and consultants of the Company or anany affiliate. An aggregate of 10,000,000 shares of common sharesstock has been reserved for issuance under the Plan. In addition, the maximum number of awards to be granted to a participant in any calendar year is 500,000 shares/units. Awards may be in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units ("RSUs") or other stock-based awards in WPG Inc., long term incentive units ("LTIP units" or "LTIPs") or performance units "Performance LTIPs"("Performance LTIP Units") in WPG L.P. The Plan terminates on May 28, 2024.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


Long Term Incentive Awards
Time Vested LTIP Awards
The Company has issued time-vested LTIP units ("Inducement LTIP Units") to certain executive officers and employees under the Plan, pursuant to LTIP Unit Award Agreements between the Company and each of the grant recipients. These awards will vest and the related fair value will be expensed over a four-year vesting period. During the yearyears ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Company did not grant any Inducement LTIP Units.
During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company awarded 203,215 and 283,610 Inducement LTIP Units, respectively, to certain executive officers and employees of the Company under the Plan, pursuant to LTIP Unit Award Agreements between the Company and each of the grant recipients.
The Inducement LTIP Units vest and the related fair value will be expensed over a four-year vesting period, subject to each respective grant recipient's continued employment on each such vesting date, except in certain instances that result in accelerated vesting due to severance arrangements. The fair value of the Inducement LTIP Units of $8.4 million is being recognized as expense over the applicable vesting period. As of December 31, 2016,2018, the estimated future compensation expense for Inducement LTIP Units was $1.0 million.$38. The weighted average period over which the compensation expense will be recorded for the Inducement LTIP Units is approximately 2.00.2 years.
A summary of the Inducement LTIP Units and changes during the year ended December 31, 20162018 is listed below:
Activity for the Year Ended December 31,Activity for the Year Ended December 31,
20162018
Inducement LTIP Units 
Weighted
Average Grant Date
Fair Value
Inducement LTIP Units Weighted
Average Grant Date
Fair Value
Outstanding unvested at beginning of year264,808
 $18.09
37,868
 $17.82
Units granted
 $

 $
Units vested(189,755) $18.07
(25,036) $17.97
Units forfeited
 $
Outstanding unvested at end of year75,053
 $18.16
12,832
 $17.53
During the year ended December 31, 2017, 29,685 LTIP Units, with a weighted average grant date fair value per share of $18.33, vested. During the year ended December 31, 2016, 189,755 LTIP Units, with a weighted average grant date fair value per share of $18.07, vested.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


Performance Based Awards
2015 Awards
During 2015, the Company authorized the award of LTIP units subject to certain market conditions under ASC 718 ("Performance LTIP Units") to certain executive officers and employees of the Company in the maximum total amount of 304,818 units, to be earned and related fair value expensed over the applicable performance periods, except in certain instances that could result in accelerated vesting due to severance arrangements.
The Performance LTIP Units that were allocated during the year ended December 31, 2015 are market based awards with a service condition. Recipients may earncould have earned between 0% - 100%-100% of the award based on the Company's achievement of absolute and relative (versus the MSCI REIT Index) total shareholder return ("TSR") goals, with 40% of the Performance LTIP Units available to be earned with respect to each performance period based on achievement of absolute TSR goals, and 60% of the Performance LTIP Units available to be earned with respect to each performance period based on achievement of relative TSR goals.
The Performance LTIP Units issued during 2015 relate to the following performance periods: from the beginning of the service period to (i) December 31, 2016 ("2015-First Special PP"), (ii) December 31, 2017 ("2015-Second Special PP"), and (iii) December 31, 2018 ("2015-Third Special PP"). There was no award for the 2015-First Special PP, 2015-Second Special PP, or 2015-Third Special PP since our TSR was below the threshold level during 2016.2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively.
2014Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards
During 2014,the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company awarded Performance LTIP Units subject to performanceapproved the terms and conditions described below toof the 2018 and 2017 annual awards (the "2018 Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards" and "2017 Long-Term Incentive Awards," respectively) for certain executive officers and employees of the Company. Under the terms of the awards program, each participant is provided the opportunity to receive (i) time-based RSUs and (ii) performance-based stock units ("PSUs"). RSUs represent a contingent right to receive one WPG Inc. common share for each vested RSU. RSUs will vest in one-third installments on each annual anniversary of the respective Grant Date (as referenced below), subject to the participant's continued employment with the Company inthrough each vesting date and the maximum totalparticipant's continued compliance with certain applicable covenants. During the service period, dividend equivalents will be paid with respect to the RSUs corresponding to the amount of 451,017 unitsany dividends paid by the Company to be earned and related fair value expensedthe Company's common shareholders for the applicable dividend payment dates. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the applicable performance periods,three year vesting term, except in certain instances that result in accelerated vesting due to severance arrangements.
The number of Performance LTIP Units Actual PSUs earned in respect of each performance period will be determined as a percentagemay range from 0%-150% of the maximum,PSUs allocated to the award recipient, based on the Company's achievementTSR compared to a peer group based on companies with similar assets and revenue over a three-year performance period that commenced on the respective Grant Date (as referenced below). During the performance period, dividend equivalents corresponding to the amount of absoluteany regular cash dividends paid by the Company to the Company’s common shareholders for the applicable dividend payment dates will accrue and relative (versusbe deemed reinvested in additional PSUs, which will be settled in common shares at the MSCI REIT Index) TSR goals, with 40%same time and only to the extent that the underlying PSU is earned and settled in common shares. Payout of the Performance LTIP Units availablePSUs is also subject to be earnedthe participant’s continued employment with respect to eachthe Company through the end of the performance period. The PSUs were valued through the use of a Monte Carlo model and the related compensation expense is recognized over the three-year performance period, based on achievementexcept in instances that result in accelerated amortization due to severance arrangements.
The following table summarizes the issuance of absolutethe 2018 Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards and 2017 Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards, respectively:
 2018 Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards 2017 Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards
Grant DateFebruary 20, 2018 February 21, 2017
RSUs issued587,000 358,198
Grant date fair value per unit$6.10 $9.58
PSUs issued587,000 358,198
Grant date fair value per unit$4.88 $7.72
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


TSR goals, and 60% of the Performance LTIP Units available to be earned with respect to each performance period based on achievement of relative TSR goals.
The Performance LTIP Units that were issued during the year ended December 31, 2014 are market based awards with a service condition. Recipients may earn between 0% - 100% of the award based on the Company's achievement of the TSR goals. The Performance LTIP Units issued during 2014 relate to the following performance periods: from the beginning of the service period to (i) December 31, 2015 ("2014-First Special PP"), (ii) December 31, 2016 ("2014-Second Special PP"), and (iii) December 31, 2017 ("2014-Third Special PP"). There was no award for the 2014-First Special PP or 2014-Second Special PP since our TSR was below the threshold level during 2015 and 2016, respectively.
Vesting
The Performance LTIP awards that are earned, if any, will then be subject to a service-based vesting period. The vesting date would be January 15, 2018 for the 2015-Second Special PP. Awards earned under the 2015-Third Special PP would vest immediately upon the conclusion of the performance period and would require no subsequent service.
Awards earned under the 2014-Third Special PP would vest immediately upon the conclusion of the performance period and would require no subsequent service.
The fair value of the Performance LTIP Unit awards was estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model and compensation is being recognized ratably from the beginning of the service period through the applicable vesting date performance period.
The total amount of compensation to recognized over the performance period, andtable summarizes the assumptions used to value the grants is provided below:PSUs under a Monte Carlo simulation model:
 2015 2014
Fair value per share of Performance LTIP Units$7.28
 $9.27
Total amount to be recognized over the performance period$2,218
 $4,182
Risk free rate1.04% 1.11%
Volatility25.96% 28.88%
Dividend yield6.43% 5.20%
As of December 31, 2016, the estimated future compensation expense for Performance LTIP Units was $256. The weighted average period over which the compensation expense will be recorded for the Performance LTIP Units is approximately 1.1 years.
Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards
 2018 Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards 2017 Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards
Risk free rate2.39% 1.49%
Volatility24.70% 20.52%
Dividend yield16.39% 10.44%
During 2016, the Company approved the performance criteria and maximum dollar amount of the 2016 annual awards (the "2016 Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards"), that generally range from 30%-100% of actual base salary, earnings unless otherwise determined by contract, for certain executive officers and employees of the Company. The number of awards iswas determined by converting the cash value of the award to a number of restricted stock unitsRSUs (the "Allocated RSUs") based on the average closing price of WPG Inc.'s common shares for the final 15 trading days of 2016. Recipients areEventual recipients were eligible to receive a percentage of the Allocated RSUs based on the Company's performance on its strategic goals detailed in the Company's 2016 cash bonus plan and the Company's relative TSR compared to a peer group based on companies with similar assets operations, and revenue. Payout for 50% of the Allocated RSUs iswas based on the Company's performance on the strategic goals and the payout on the remaining 50% iswas based on the Company's TSR performance. Any 2016 Allocated RSUs earned will be granted in 2017 and vest one-third on each of January 1, 2018, 2019 and 2020. The fair value of the awards related to the Company's TSR performance will be expensed over the period from May 17, 2016 (when service began and award was approved by the Compensation Committee) through the end of the vesting period. If earned, the fair value of the portion of the awards based upon the Company's performance of the strategic goals will be recognized as expense over the period from the 2017 grant date through the end of the vesting period. Both the strategic goal component as well as the TSR performance were achieved at target, resulting in a 100% payout. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company awarded 324,237 Allocated RSUs, with a grant date fair value of $2.2 million, related to the 2016 Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards, which will vest in one-third installments on each of February 21, 2018, 2019 and 2020, except in instances that result in accelerated vesting due to severance arrangements.
During 2015, the Company approved the performance criteria and maximum dollar amount of the 2015 annual LTIP unit awards (the "2015 Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards"), that generally range from 30%-300% of actual base salary earnings, for certain executive officers and employees of the Company. The number of awards iswas determined by converting the cash value of the award to a number of LTIP units (the "Allocated Units") based on the average closing price of WPG Inc.'s common shares for the final 15 trading days of 2015. Eventual recipients were eligible to receive a percentage of the Allocated Units based on the Company's performance on its strategic goals detailed in the Company's 2015 cash bonus plan and the Company's relative total shareholder
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


return ("TSR")TSR compared to the MSCI REIT Index. Payout for 40% of the Allocated Units was based on the Company's performance on the strategic goals and the payout on the remaining 60% was based on the Company's TSR performance. The strategic goal component was achieved in 2015; however, the TSR was below threshold performance, resulting in only a 40% payout for this annual LTIP award. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company awarded 323,417 LTIP units related to the 2015 Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards, of which 108,118 vest in one-third installments on each of January 1, 2017, 2018 and 2019. The 94,106 LTIP units awarded to our former Executive Chairman fully vested on the grant date and the 121,193 LTIP units awarded to certain former executive officers fully vested on the applicable severance datedates during 2016 pursuant to the underlying severance arrangements. The fair value of the portion of the awards based upon the Company's performance of the strategic goals was recognized to expense when granted.
The 2016 and 2015 Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards that are based upon TSR were calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The total amount of compensation to be recognized over the performance period, and the assumptions used to value the 2016 and 2015 Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards are provided below:
 2016 2015
Fair value per share of Allocated RSUs/Units$3.81
 $7.07
Total amount to be recognized over the performance period$2,516
 $4,656
Risk free rate0.44% 0.20%
Volatility31.40% 22.66%
Dividend yield10.05% 6.03%

WPG Restricted Share Awards
As part of the Merger,The WPG Restricted Shares relate to unvested restricted shares held by certain GRT executive employees which had an original vesting periodat the time of five years, were converted into 1,039,785 WPG restricted common shares (the “WPG Restricted Shares”). The WPG Restricted Shares will be amortized over the remaining life of the applicable vesting period, except for the portion of the awards applicable to pre-Merger service, which was included as equity consideration issued in the Merger.
merger. The amount of compensation expense related to unvested restricted shares that we expect to recognize in future periods is $0.8 million$33 over a weighted average period of 1.60.3 years. During the year ended December 31, 20162018, the aggregate intrinsic value of shares that vested was $9.6 million.
A summary of the status of the WPG Restricted Shares at December 31, 2016 and changes during the year are presented below:
 Activity for the Year Ended December 31,
 2016
 
Restricted
Shares
 
Weighted
Average Grant Date
Fair Value
Outstanding at beginning of year926,964
 $18.18
Shares granted
 $
Shares vested/forfeited(776,385) $18.18
Outstanding at end of year150,579
 $18.18

The weighted average grant date fair value of restricted shares granted during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $0, $18.18, and $0, respectively. The total fair value of the restricted shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $14,115, $2,051, and $0, respectively.$44.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


A summary of the status of the WPG Restricted Shares at December 31, 2018 and changes during the year are presented below:
 Activity for the Year Ended December 31,
 2018
 Restricted
Shares
 Weighted
Average Grant Date
Fair Value
Outstanding at beginning of year30,535
 $18.18
Shares granted
 $
Shares vested/forfeited(21,502) $18.18
Outstanding at end of year9,033
 $18.18

There were no restricted shares granted during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016. The total original fair value of the restricted shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $391, $2,182, and $14,115, respectively.
WPG Restricted Stock Unit Awards
The Company issues restricted stock units ("RSUs")RSUs to certain executive officers, employees, and non-employee directors of the Board. During the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, the Company issued 518,112, 82,203812,440, 843,435 and 49,520518,112 RSUs, respectively. Of the 812,440 RSUs issued in 2018, 587,000 RSUs with a fair value of $3.6 million relates to the annual long-term incentive award issuances that occurred in February 2018 (see "Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards" section above). Of the 843,435 RSUs issued in 2017, 682,435 RSUs with a fair value of $5.6 million relates to the annual long-term incentive award issuances that occurred in February 2017 (see "Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards" section above). Of the 518,112 RSUs issued in 2016, 284,483 RSUs with a fair value of $3.3 million relates to Mr. Louis G. Conforti's appointment as the Company's CEO in October 2016. The RSUs are service-based awards and the related fair value is expensed over the applicable service periods, except in instances that result in accelerated vesting due to severance arrangements.
The amount of compensation related to the unvested RSUs that we expect to recognize in future periods is $6.0$6.6 million over a weighted average period of 2.61.5 years.
A summary of the status of the WPG RSUs at December 31, 20162018 and changes during the year are presented below:
Activity for the Year Ended December 31,Activity for the Year Ended December 31,
20162018
RSUs 
Weighted
Average Grant Date
Fair Value
RSUs Weighted
Average Grant Date
Fair Value
Outstanding unvested at beginning of year95,607
 $14.92
1,157,576
 $9.40
RSUs granted518,112
 $11.48
812,440
 $6.28
RSUs vested/forfeited(108,877) $13.03
(400,703) $8.29
Outstanding unvested at end of year504,842
 $11.80
1,569,313
 $8.07
The weighted average grant date fair value per share of RSUs granted during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 2015was $6.28, $8.07, and 2014 was $11.48, $13.62, and $19.01, respectively. The total fair value of the RSUs vested during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 2015was $3,320, $1,128, and 2014 was $1,082, $628, and $0, respectively.
Stock Options
Options granted under the Company's Plan generally vest over a three year period, with options exercisable at a rate of 33.3% per annum beginning with the first anniversary on the date of the grant. These options were valued using the Black-Scholes pricing model and the expense associated with these options are amortized over the requisite vesting period.
As part ofThere were no options granted during the Merger, outstanding stock options held by certain former GRT employeesyears ended December 31, 2018 and one former GRT board member who joined the WPG Inc. Board of Directors were converted into 1,125,014 WPG stock options. Due to provisions within the option agreements, all of these options immediately vested. Additionally the Company granted 393,000 options to employees during2017. During the year ended December 31, 2015.2016, the Company granted 247,500 options to employees. The weighted average grant date fair value of the options converted and granted during the year ended December 31, 2015 was $2.63. There were no option grants for the year ended December 31, 2014.
A summary of the status of the Company's option plans at December 31, 2016 and changes during the year are listed below:
 Activity for the Year Ended December 31,
 2016
 Stock Options 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Outstanding at beginning of year1,145,181
 $2.48
Options granted247,500
 $0.62
Options exercised(53,080) $6.53
Options forfeited/expired(362,025) $1.27
Outstanding at end of year977,576
 $2.24
$0.62.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


A summary of the status of the Company's option plans at December 31, 2018 and changes during the year are listed below:
 Activity for the Year Ended December 31,
 2018
 Stock Options Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Outstanding at beginning of year794,014
 $2.26
Options granted
 $
Options exercised
 $
Options forfeited/expired(114,273) $3.36
Outstanding at end of year679,741
 $2.08
The fair value of each option grant was the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes options pricing mode.  The weighted average per share value of options granted as well as the assumptions used to value the grants is listed below:
2016 20152016
Weighted average per share value of options granted/converted$0.62
 $2.63
$0.62
Weighted average risk free rates1.4% 1.0%1.4%
Expected average lives in years6.0
 3.8
6.0 years
Annual dividend rates$1.00
 $1.00
$1.00
Weighted average volatility28.3% 22.1%28.3%
Forfeiture rate10% 10%10%
The following table summarizes information regarding the options outstanding at December 31, 2016:2018:
Options OutstandingOptions Outstanding Options ExercisableOptions Outstanding Options Exercisable
Range of
Exercise Prices
 
Number
Outstanding at
December 31,
2016
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 
Number
Exercisable at
December 31,
2016
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 Number
Outstanding at
December 31,
2018
 Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
 Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 Number
Exercisable at
December 31,
2018
 Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
 Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
$34.80 34,452 0.2 $34.80 34,452 0.2 $34.80
$13.96 25,252 1.2 $13.96 25,252 1.2 $13.96
$1.79 7,282 2.2 $1.79 7,282 2.2 $1.79 2,348 0.2 $1.79 2,348 0.2 $1.79
$5.76 29,489 3.2 $5.76 29,489 3.2 $5.76 14,758 1.2 $5.76 14,758 1.2 $5.76
$11.97 55,071 4.3 $11.97 55,071 4.3 $11.97 36,267 2.3 $11.97 36,267 2.3 $11.97
$12.67 83,235 5.4 $12.67 83,235 5.4 $12.67 55,419 3.4 $12.67 55,419 3.4 $12.67
$16.56 138,681 6.4 $16.56 138,681 6.4 $16.56 105,381 4.4 $16.56 105,381 4.4 $16.56
$13.10-$13.84 108,114 7.4 $13.15 108,114 7.4 $13.15
$13.10 72,068 5.3 $13.10 72,068 5.3 $13.10
$14.28 283,500 8.4 $14.28 94,501 8.4 $14.28 226,000 6.4 $14.28 226,000 6.4 $14.28
$9.95 212,500 9.4 $9.95   167,500 7.4 $9.95 111,663 7.4 $9.95
 977,576 7.0 $13.64 576,077 5.7 $14.78 679,741 5.6 $12.96 623,904 5.4 $13.23
The following table summarizes the aggregate intrinsic value of options that are: outstanding, exercisable and exercised. It also depicts the fair value of options that have vested.
 For the Year Ended December 31,
 2016
Aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding$298
Aggregate intrinsic value of options exercisable$200
Aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised$163
Aggregate fair value of options vested$191
The aggregate intrinsic value of options that exercised and the aggregate fair value of options that vested during the year ended December 31, 2015 was $982 and $3,380, respectively.
 For the Year Ended December 31,
 2018
Aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding$7
Aggregate intrinsic value of options exercisable$7
Aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised$
Aggregate fair value of options vested$154
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


The aggregate intrinsic value of options that exercised and the aggregate fair value of options that vested during the year ended December 31, 2017 was $12 and $187, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of options that exercised and the aggregate fair value of options that vested during the year ended December 31, 2016 was $163 and $191, respectively.
Share Award Related Compensation Expense
During the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, the Company recorded share award related compensation expense pertaining to the award and option plans noted above within the consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) as indicated below (amounts in millions):
 For the Year Ended December 31, For the Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014 2018 2017 2016
Merger, restructuring and transaction costs $9.5
 $4.0
 $
 $
 $
 $9.5
General and administrative 4.6
 10.1
 1.8
General and administrative and property operating 8.3
 6.4
 4.6
Total expense $14.1
 $14.1
 $1.8
 $8.3
 $6.4
 $14.1
Distributions
During the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, the Board declared common share/unit dividends of $1.00 per common share/unit, respectively.
10.    Commitments and Contingencies
10.Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
We are involved from time-to-time in various legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business, including, but not limited to commercial disputes, environmental matters, and litigation in connection with transactions including acquisitions and divestitures. We believe that such litigation, claims and administrative proceedings will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position or our results of operations. We record a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.
Lease Commitments
As of December 31, 2016,2018, a total of sevenfour consolidated properties are subject to ground leases. The termination dates of these ground leases range from 20212026 to 2076. These ground leases generally require us to make fixed annual rental payments, or a fixed annual rental plus a percentage rent component based upon the revenues or total sales of the property. Some of these leases also include escalation clauses and renewal options. We incurred ground lease expense, which is included in ground rent in the accompanying consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income, (loss), for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 2015of $789, $2,438 and 2014$4,318, respectively. Additionally, the Company has two material office leases and one material garage lease. The termination dates of $4,318, $6,874these leases range from 2023 to 2026. These leases generally require us to make fixed annual rental payments, plus our share of common-area maintenance expense and $2,836,real estate taxes and insurance. We incurred lease expense, which is included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 of $2,668, $2,397, and $2,160, respectively.
Future minimum lease payments due under these ground leases for each of the next five years and thereafter, excluding applicable extension options, as of December 31, 20162018 are as follows:
2017 $3,516
2018 3,542
2019 3,542
 $2,029
2020 3,542
 2,049
2021 3,538
 2,069
2022 2,099
2023 1,427
Thereafter 119,556
 21,377
 $137,236
 $31,050
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


Concentration of Credit Risk
Our properties rely heavily upon anchor or major tenants to attract customers; however, these retailers do not constitute a material portion of our financial results. Additionally, many anchor retailers in the enclosed retail properties own their spaces further reducing their contribution to our operating results. All operations are within the United States and no customer or tenant accounts for 5% or more of our consolidated and combined revenues.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


11.    Related Party Transactions
11.Related Party Transactions
Transactions with SPG
As describedThe Company was formed in Note 1 - "Organization" and Note 2 - "Basis2014 through a spin-off of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation and Combination," the accompanying consolidated and combined financial statements include the operations of the SPG Businesses as carved-outcertain properties from the financial statements of SPG for the periods prior to the separation and the operations of the properties under the Company's ownership subsequent to the separation. Transactions between the properties have been eliminated in the consolidated and combined presentation.
For periods prior to the separation, a fee has been charged to each of the properties in the combined financial statements for certain centralized SPG costs for activities such as common costs for management and other services, national advertising and promotion programs, consulting, accounting, legal, marketing and management information systems. In addition, certain commercial general liability and property damage insurance was provided to the properties by an indirect subsidiary of SPG. In connection with the separation, SPG managed the day-to-day operations of our legacy SPG enclosed retail properties through February 29, 2016 in accordance with property management agreements that expired as of May 31, 2016. Additionally, WPG and SPG entered into a transition services agreement pursuant to which SPG provided to WPG, on an interim, transitional basis after the Separation DateMay 28, 2014 through May 31, 2016, the date on which it was terminated, various services including administrative support for the community centersopen air properties through December 31, 2015, information technology, property management, accounts payable and other financial functions, as well as engineering support, quality assurance support and other administrative services for the enclosed retail properties throughuntil March 1, 2016. Under the transition services agreement that terminated on May 31, 2016, SPG charged WPG, based upon SPG's allocation of certain shared costs such as insurance premiums, advertising and promotional programs, leasing and development fees. Amounts charged to expense for property management and common costs, services, and other as well as insurance premiums are included in property operating costsexpenses in the consolidated and combined statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).income. Additionally, leasing and development fees charged by SPG arewere capitalized by the property.
Charges for properties which are consolidated and combined for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:
  For the Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
Property management and common costs, services and other $8,791
 $23,302
 $20,685
Insurance premiums $
 $9,076
 $9,150
Advertising and promotional programs $102
 $812
 $1,030
Capitalized leasing and development fees $3,166
 $9,841
 $9,827
Charges for unconsolidated properties for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:
  For the Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
Property management costs, services and other $196
 $816
 $2,193
Insurance premiums $
 $12
 $129
Advertising and promotional programs $6
 $46
 $50
Capitalized leasing and development fees $23
 $55
 $207
As of December 31, 2016, the Company had paid, in full, all amounts due to SPG and its affiliates. As of December 31, 2015, $3,455 was payable to SPG and its affiliates and is included in accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, and deferred revenues in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
In connection with and as part of WPG's post-Merger integration efforts, WPG terminated the transition services agreement, all applicable property management agreements with SPG, and the property development agreement except for certain limited ongoing development projects, effective May 31, 2016.
We did not incur any charges pertaining to the transition services agreements for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. Charges for properties which for the year ended December 31, 2016 are as follows:
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


  For the Year Ended December 31,
  2016
  Consolidated Unconsolidated
Property management and common costs, services and other $8,791
 $196
Insurance premiums $
 $
Advertising and promotional programs $102
 $6
Capitalized leasing and development fees $3,166
 $23
12.    Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share/UnitConsulting Agreement with Mark S. Ordan
Mr. Mark S. Ordan served as a member of the Board until May 18, 2017 at which time his term on the Board expired and he retired from service. During 2017, Mr. Ordan and the Company were parties to a Consulting Agreement in which Mr. Ordan provided consulting services to the Company for a fee. The Consulting Agreement was terminated on May 28, 2017. During 2017, the Company paid Mr. Ordan approximately $0.2 million in fees under the Consulting Agreement. The Company has no further payment obligations under the Consulting Agreement.
12.Earnings Per Common Share/Unit
WPG Inc. Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
We determine WPG Inc.'s basic earnings (loss) per common share based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period and we consider any participating securities for purposes of applying the two-class method. We determine WPG Inc.'s diluted earnings (loss) per share based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding combined with the incremental weighted average shares that would have been outstanding assuming all potentially dilutive securities were converted into common shares at the earliest date possible.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


The following table sets forth the computation of WPG Inc.'s basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
  For the Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share, Basic:      
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders - basic $53,099
 $(101,286) $170,029
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic 185,633,582
 184,195,769
 155,162,597
Earnings (Loss) per common share, basic $0.29
 $(0.55) $1.10
       
Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share, Diluted:      
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders - basic $53,099
 $(101,286) $170,029
Net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders 10,034
 (19,340) 35,426
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders - diluted $63,133
 $(120,626) $205,455
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic 185,633,582
 184,195,769
 155,162,597
Weighted average operating partnership units outstanding 34,304,109
 34,303,804
 32,202,440
Weighted average additional dilutive securities outstanding 803,805
 
 125,907
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted 220,741,496
 218,499,573
 187,490,944
Earnings (loss) per common share, diluted $0.29
 $(0.55) $1.10
  For the Year Ended December 31,
  2018 2017 2016
Earnings Per Common Share, Basic:      
Net income attributable to common shareholders - basic $79,572
 $183,031
 $53,099
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic 187,696,339
 186,829,385
 185,633,582
Earnings per common share, basic $0.42
 $0.98
 $0.29
       
Earnings Per Common Share, Diluted:      
Net income attributable to common shareholders - basic $79,572
 $183,031
 $53,099
Net income attributable to common unitholders 14,735
 34,222
 10,034
Net income attributable to common shareholders - diluted $94,307
 $217,253
 $63,133
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic 187,696,339
 186,829,385
 185,633,582
Weighted average operating partnership units outstanding 34,703,770
 34,808,890
 34,304,109
Weighted average additional dilutive securities outstanding 603,674
 337,508
 803,805
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted 223,003,783
 221,975,783
 220,741,496
Earnings per common share, diluted $0.42
 $0.98
 $0.29
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, additional potentially dilutive securities include contingently-issuable outstanding stock options and performance based components of annual LTIP unit awards. For the year ended December 31, 2015, diluted shares exclude the impact of any such securities because their effect would be anti-dilutive. We accrue distributions when they are declared.
WPG L.P. Earnings (Loss) Per Common Unit
We determine WPG L.P.'s basic earnings (loss) per common unit based on the weighted average number of common units outstanding during the period and we consider any participating securities for purposes of applying the two-class method. We determine WPG L.P.'s diluted earnings (loss) per unit based on the weighted average number of common units outstanding combined with the incremental weighted average units that would have been outstanding assuming all potentially dilutive securities were converted into common units at the earliest date possible.
The following table sets forth the computation of WPG L.P.'s basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common unit:
 For the Year Ended December 31, For the Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014 2018 2017 2016
Earnings (loss) Per Common Unit, Basic and Diluted:      
Net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders - basic and diluted $63,133
 $(120,626) $205,455
Earnings Per Common Unit, Basic and Diluted:      
Net income attributable to common unitholders - basic and diluted $94,307
 $217,253
 $63,133
Weighted average common units outstanding - basic 219,937,691
 218,499,573
 187,365,037
 222,400,109
 221,638,275
 219,937,691
Weighted average additional dilutive securities outstanding 803,805
 
 125,907
 603,674
 337,508
 803,805
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted 220,741,496
 218,499,573
 187,490,944
 223,003,783
 221,975,783
 220,741,496
Earnings (loss) per common unit, basic and diluted $0.29
 $(0.55) $1.10
Earnings per common unit, basic and diluted $0.42
 $0.98
 $0.29
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, additional potentially dilutive securities include contingently-issuable units related to WPG Inc.'s outstanding stock options and WPG L.P.Inc.'s performance based components of annual LTIP unit awards. ForWe accrue distributions when they are declared.
13.Subsequent Events
On January 18, 2019, we completed the year endedsale of the sixth tranche of restaurant outparcels to Four Corners. This tranche consisted of eight restaurant outparcels. Additionally, on February 11, 2019, we closed on the sale of one additional restaurant outparcel. The allocated purchase price was approximately $12.2 million, and the net proceeds of approximately $12.1 million were used to fund ongoing redevelopment efforts and for general corporate purposes.
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except share, unit, per share and per unit amounts and
where indicated as in millions or billions)


During the first quarter of 2019, Fitch Ratings & Moody's Investor Service lowered their credit rating on WPG L.P.'s unsecured long-term indebtedness, which will increase interest rates on our Facility (as defined in Note 6 - "Indebtedness"), December 31, 2015 diluted shares excludeTerm Loan, and 5.950% Notes due 2024 as of February 2, 2019. Due to the downgrade, our Revolver will bear interest at LIBOR plus 165 basis points (an increase of 40 basis points), our Term Loan will bear interest at LIBOR plus 190 basis points (an increase of 45 basis points), and our December 2015 Term Loan will bear interest at LIBOR plus 235 basis points (an increase of 55 basis points). Our 5.950% Notes due 2024 will bear interest at 6.450% (an increase of 50 basis points). Assuming the new pricing grid was effective January 1, 2018, the impact would have resulted in an increase in borrowing costs of any such securities because their effect would be anti-dilutive. We accrue distributions when they are declared.
13.    Subsequent Events
On January 10, 2017, we completed the sale of Virginia Center Commons to a private real estate investor for a purchase price of $9 million. The net proceeds from the transaction were used to reduce the balance of corporate debt.approximately $8.5 million during 2018.
On February 21, 2017, we completed5, 2019, the saleCompany’s Executive Vice President, Head of Gulf View SquareOpen Air Centers, was terminated without cause from his position and River Oaks Centerreceived severance payments and other benefits pursuant to private real estate investors forthe terms and conditions of his employment agreement. In addition, the Company terminated, without cause, additional non-executive personnel in the Property Management department as part of an aggregate purchase price of $42 million. The net proceeds from the transaction were usedeffort to reduce overhead costs. The Company expects to record aggregate severance charges of approximately $1.9 million, including $0.1 million of non-cash stock compensation in the balanceform of corporate debt.accelerated vesting of equity incentive awards.
On February 21, 2017,12, 2019, the Board declared common share/unit dividends of $0.25 per common share.share/unit. The dividend is payable on March 15, 20172019 to shareholders/unitholders of record on March 8, 2017.4, 2019.
14.    Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
14.Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Quarterly 20162018 and 20152017 data is summarized in the table below. Quarterly amounts may not sum to annual amounts due to rounding.
 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 First
Quarter
 Second
Quarter
 Third
Quarter
 Fourth
Quarter
2016  
  
  
  
2018  
  
  
  
Total revenue $210,031
 $205,738
 $209,922
 $217,784
 $180,340
 $178,728
 $179,916
 $184,321
Operating income $55,378
 $25,835
 $38,425
 $65,355
Net income $13,681
 $24,737
 $5,183
 $33,815
 $20,185
 $15,519
 $4,115
 $68,836
Washington Prime Group Inc.:                
Net income attributable to the Company $12,022
 $21,315
 $4,870
 $28,924
 $17,524
 $13,594
 $3,971
 $58,515
Net income attributable to common shareholders $8,514
 $17,807
 $1,362
 $25,416
 $14,016
 $10,086
 $463
 $55,007
Earnings per common share—basic and diluted $0.05
 $0.10
 $0.01
 $0.13
 $0.07
 $0.05
 $0.00
 $0.29
Washington Prime Group, L.P.:                
Net income attributable to unitholders $13,687
 $24,745
 $5,187
 $33,786
 $20,185
 $15,519
 $4,115
 $68,836
Net income attributable to common unitholders $10,119
 $21,177
 $1,619
 $30,218
 $16,617
 $11,951
 $547
 $65,192
Earnings per common unit—basic and diluted $0.05
 $0.10
 $0.01
 $0.13
 $0.07
 $0.05
 $0.00
 $0.29
2015  
  
  
  
2017  
  
  
  
Total revenue $237,718
 $237,528
 $216,739
 $229,371
 $202,394
 $189,171
 $179,320
 $187,237
Operating income (loss) $27,755
 $44,806
 $38,274
 $(77,100)
Net (loss) income $(9,588) $8,944
 $8,128
 $(111,606)
Net income (loss) $14,624
 $164,500
 $(10,664) $63,133
Washington Prime Group Inc.:                
Net (loss) income attributable to the Company $(7,292) $7,896
 $7,565
 $(93,466)
Net (loss) income attributable to common shareholders $(12,270) $3,901
 $4,057
 $(96,974)
(Loss) earnings per common share—basic and diluted $(0.07) $0.02
 $0.02
 $(0.52)
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company $12,810
 $138,975
 $(8,395) $53,673
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders $9,302
 $135,467
 $(11,903) $50,165
Earnings (loss) per common share—basic $0.05
 $0.73
 $(0.06) $0.27
Earnings (loss) per common share—diluted $0.05
 $0.72
 $(0.06) $0.27
Washington Prime Group, L.P.:                
Net (loss) income attributable to unitholders $(9,585) $8,941
 $8,146
 $(111,910)
Net (loss) income attributable to common unitholders $(14,613) $4,886
 $4,638
 $(115,537)
(Loss) earnings per common unit—basic and diluted $(0.07) $0.02
 $0.02
 $(0.52)
Net income (loss) attributable to unitholders $14,624
 $164,500
 $(10,664) $63,133
Net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders $11,056
 $160,932
 $(14,232) $59,497
Earnings (loss) per common unit—basic $0.05
 $0.73
 $(0.06) $0.27
Earnings (loss) per common unit—diluted $0.05
 $0.72
 $(0.06) $0.27

SCHEDULE III
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 20162018
(dollars in thousands)

     Initial Cost 
Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Construction
or Acquisition
 
Gross Amounts At
Which Carried
at Close of Period
         Initial Cost Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Construction
or Acquisition
 Gross Amounts At
Which Carried
at Close of Period
    
Name Location Encumbrances(3) Land 
Buildings and
Improvements
 Land 
Buildings and
Improvements
 Land 
Buildings and
Improvements
 Total(1) 
Accumulated
Depreciation(2)
 
Date of
Construction or
Acquisition
 Location Encumbrances(3) Land Buildings and
Improvements
 Land Buildings and
Improvements
 Land Buildings and
Improvements
 Total(1) Accumulated
Depreciation(2)
 Date of
Construction or
Acquisition
Enclosed Retail Properties    
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
      
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Anderson Mall Anderson, SC $18,981
 $1,712
 $15,227
 $851
 $20,502
 $2,563
 $35,729
 $38,292
 $21,210
 1972 Anderson, SC $17,891
 $1,712
 $15,227
 $851
 $19,982
 $2,563
 $35,209
 $37,772
 $23,377
 1972
Arbor Hills Ann Arbor, MI 25,498
 8,564
 40,368
 
 670
 8,564
 41,038
 49,602
 2,750
 2015
Arboretum, The Austin, TX 
 7,640
 36,774
 71
 14,072
 7,711
 50,846
 58,557
 24,856
 1998
Ashland Town Center Ashland, KY 38,440
 13,462
 68,367
 
 1,731
 13,462
 70,098
 83,560
 6,264
 2015 Ashland, KY 36,824
 13,462
 68,367
 
 5,536
 13,462
 73,903
 87,365
 12,739
 2015
Bowie Town Center Bowie (Wash, D.C.), MD 
 2,479
 60,322
 235
 10,025
 2,714
 70,347
 73,061
 35,633
 2001 Bowie (Wash, D.C.), MD 
 2,479
 60,322
 235
 9,932
 2,714
 70,254
 72,968
 39,699
 2001
Boynton Beach Mall Boynton Beach (Miami), FL 
 22,240
 78,804
 4,666
 30,855
 26,906
 109,659
 136,565
 66,509
 1996 Boynton Beach (Miami), FL 
 22,240
 78,804
 4,666
 29,544
 26,906
 108,348
 135,254
 73,264
 1996
Brunswick Square East Brunswick (New York), NJ 73,791
 8,436
 55,838
 
 34,028
 8,436
 89,866
 98,302
 52,364
 1996 East Brunswick (New York), NJ 71,154
 8,436
 55,838
 
 35,296
 8,436
 91,134
 99,570
 57,770
 1996
Charlottesville Fashion Square Charlottesville, VA 47,878
 
 54,738
 
 18,498
 
 73,236
 73,236
 39,228
 1997 Charlottesville, VA 46,099
 
 54,738
 
 18,814
 
 73,552
 73,552
 43,711
 1997
Chautauqua Mall Lakewood, NY 
 3,116
 9,641
 
 16,971
 3,116
 26,612
 29,728
 16,108
 1996 Lakewood, NY 
 3,116
 9,641
 
 19,327
 3,116
 28,968
 32,084
 17,554
 1996
Chesapeake Square Theater Chesapeake (VA Beach), VA 
 628
 9,536
 
 (738) 628
 8,798
 9,426
 1,554
 1996 Chesapeake (VA Beach), VA 
 628
 9,536
 
 (738) 628
 8,798
 9,426
 2,162
 1996
Clay Terrace Carmel (Indianapolis), IN 
 39,030
 115,207
 
 4,316
 39,030
 119,523
 158,553
 12,195
 2014 Carmel (Indianapolis), IN 
 39,030
 115,207
 43
 8,815
 39,073
 124,022
 163,095
 22,408
 2014
Colonial Park Mall Harrisburg, PA 
 9,143
 30,347
 
 1,201
 9,143
 31,548
 40,691
 4,522
 2015
Cottonwood Mall Albuquerque, NM 100,772
 10,122
 69,958
 
 6,910
 10,122
 76,868
 86,990
 46,123
 1996 Albuquerque, NM 97,203
 10,122
 69,958
 5,042
 20,239
 15,164
 90,197
 105,361
 49,900
 1996
Dayton Mall Dayton, OH 82,000
 10,899
 160,723
 
 3,085
 10,899
 163,808
 174,707
 11,676
 2015 Dayton, OH 80,421
 10,899
 160,723
 
 3,027
 10,899
 163,750
 174,649
 22,388
 2015
Edison Mall Fort Myers, FL 
 11,529
 107,350
 
 31,086
 11,529
 138,436
 149,965
 73,306
 1997 Fort Myers, FL 
 11,529
 107,350
 
 34,178
 11,529
 141,528
 153,057
 80,587
 1997
Georgesville Square Columbus, OH 
 720
 
 
 
 720
 
 720
 
 2015
Grand Central Mall Parkersburg, WV 41,149
 18,956
 89,736
 
 1,758
 18,956
 91,494
 110,450
 10,336
 2015 Parkersburg, WV 39,598
 18,956
 89,736
 
 11,799
 18,956
 101,535
 120,491
 20,627
 2015
Great Lakes Mall Mentor (Cleveland), OH 
 12,302
 100,362
 
 39,327
 12,302
 139,689
 151,991
 71,407
 1996 Mentor (Cleveland), OH 
 12,302
 100,362
 98
 43,683
 12,400
 144,045
 156,445
 80,146
 1996
Indian Mound Mall Newark, OH 
 7,109
 19,205
 
 2,718
 7,109
 21,923
 29,032
 2,266
 2015 Newark, OH 
 7,109
 19,205
 (252) 1,992
 6,857
 21,197
 28,054
 4,369
 2015
Irving Mall Irving (Dallas), TX 
 6,737
 17,479
 2,533
 42,340
 9,270
 59,819
 69,089
 39,467
 1971 Irving (Dallas), TX 
 6,737
 17,479
 2,533
 44,350
 9,270
 61,829
 71,099
 43,275
 1971
Jefferson Valley Mall Yorktown Heights (New York), NY 
 4,868
 30,304
 
 61,816
 4,868
 92,120
 96,988
 43,324
 1983 Yorktown Heights (New York), NY 
 4,868
 30,304
 
 70,161
 4,868
 100,465
 105,333
 49,921
 1983
Lima Mall Lima, OH 
 7,659
 35,338
 
 15,743
 7,659
 51,081
 58,740
 29,563
 1996 Lima, OH 
 7,659
 35,338
 
 15,950
 7,659
 51,288
 58,947
 32,979
 1996
Lincolnwood Town Center Lincolnwood (Chicago), IL 50,633
 7,834
 63,480
 
 7,865
 7,834
 71,345
 79,179
 52,095
 1990 Lincolnwood (Chicago), IL 48,662
 7,834
 63,480
 
 7,684
 7,834
 71,164
 78,998
 56,644
 1990
Lindale Mall Cedar Rapids, IA 
 14,106
 58,286
 
 13,748
 14,106
 72,034
 86,140
 16,470
 1998 Cedar Rapids, IA 
 14,106
 58,286
 (1,096) 14,083
 13,010
 72,369
 85,379
 23,392
 1998
Longview Mall Longview, TX 
 259
 3,567
 124
 22,876
 383
 26,443
 26,826
 9,386
 1978 Longview, TX 
 259
 3,567
 3,320
 22,498
 3,579
 26,065
 29,644
 8,791
 1978
Malibu Lumber Yard Malibu, CA 
 
 38,741
 
 122
 
 38,863
 38,863
 2,352
 2015
Mall at Fairfield Commons, The Beavercreek, OH 
 18,194
 175,426
 
 15,630
 18,194
 191,056
 209,250
 15,399
 2015 Beavercreek, OH 
 18,194
 175,426
 (411) 20,928
 17,783
 196,354
 214,137
 30,830
 2015
Maplewood Mall St. Paul (Minneapolis), MN 
 17,119
 80,758
 
 26,707
 17,119
 107,465
 124,584
 52,724
 2002
Markland Mall Kokomo, IN 
 
 7,568
 3,005
 28,315
 3,005
 35,883
 38,888
 13,559
 1968
Melbourne Square Melbourne, FL 
 15,762
 55,891
 4,160
 40,593
 19,922
 96,484
 116,406
 53,851
 1996
Mesa Mall Grand Junction, CO 
 12,784
 80,639
 
 3,822
 12,784
 84,461
 97,245
 29,189
 1998

     Initial Cost 
Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Construction
or Acquisition
 
Gross Amounts At
Which Carried
at Close of Period
         Initial Cost Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Construction
or Acquisition
 Gross Amounts At
Which Carried
at Close of Period
    
Name Location Encumbrances(3) Land 
Buildings and
Improvements
 Land 
Buildings and
Improvements
 Land 
Buildings and
Improvements
 Total(1) 
Accumulated
Depreciation(2)
 
Date of
Construction or
Acquisition
 Location Encumbrances(3) Land Buildings and
Improvements
 Land Buildings and
Improvements
 Land Buildings and
Improvements
 Total(1) Accumulated
Depreciation(2)
 Date of
Construction or
Acquisition
Maplewood Mall St. Paul (Minneapolis), MN 
 17,119
 80,758
 
 25,148
 17,119
 105,906
 123,025
 46,327
 2002
Markland Mall Kokomo, IN 
 
 7,568
 
 19,096
 
 26,664
 26,664
 15,258
 1968
Melbourne Square Melbourne, FL 
 15,762
 55,891
 4,160
 39,346
 19,922
 95,237
 115,159
 48,057
 1996
Mesa Mall Grand Junction, CO 87,250
 12,784
 80,639
 
 3,224
 12,784
 83,863
 96,647
 21,478
 1998
Morgantown Mall Morgantown, WV 
 10,219
 77,599
 
 1,153
 10,219
 78,752
 88,971
 7,248
 2015 Morgantown, WV 
 10,219
 77,599
 
 2,405
 10,219
 80,004
 90,223
 13,801
 2015
Muncie Mall Muncie, IN 35,326
 172
 5,776
 52
 29,324
 224
 35,100
 35,324
 22,906
 1970 Muncie, IN 33,876
 172
 5,776
 52
 30,223
 224
 35,999
 36,223
 24,555
 1970
New Towne Mall New Philadelphia, OH 
 3,172
 33,112
 
 5,487
 3,172
 38,599
 41,771
 3,934
 2015 New Philadelphia, OH 
 3,172
 33,112
 
 7,585
 3,172
 40,697
 43,869
 7,961
 2015
Northtown Mall Blaine, MN 
 18,603
 57,341
 
 4,469
 18,603
 61,810
 80,413
 6,701
 2015 Blaine, MN 
 18,603
 57,341
 
 6,881
 18,603
 64,222
 82,825
 12,860
 2015
Northwoods Mall Peoria, IL 
 1,185
 12,779
 2,164
 39,743
 3,349
 52,522
 55,871
 36,418
 1983 Peoria, IL 
 1,185
 12,779
 2,689
 52,009
 3,874
 64,788
 68,662
 39,432
 1983
Oak Court Mall Memphis, TN 38,371
 15,673
 57,304
 
 10,595
 15,673
 67,899
 83,572
 48,689
 1997 Memphis, TN 36,998
 15,673
 57,304
 
 12,319
 15,673
 69,623
 85,296
 51,384
 1997
Oklahoma City Properties Oklahoma City, OK 
 18,195
 37,161
 
 3,846
 18,195
 41,007
 59,202
 4,468
 2015
Orange Park Mall Orange Park (Jacksonville), FL 
 12,998
 65,121
 
 42,680
 12,998
 107,801
 120,799
 64,775
 1994 Orange Park (Jacksonville), FL 
 12,998
 65,121
 (267) 48,997
 12,731
 114,118
 126,849
 71,814
 1994
Outlet Collection® | Seattle, The
 Auburn (Seattle), WA 86,500
 38,751
 107,094
 
 4,210
 38,751
 111,304
 150,055
 11,031
 2015 Auburn (Seattle), WA 
 38,751
 107,094
 
 13,263
 38,751
 120,357
 159,108
 21,622
 2015
Paddock Mall Ocala, FL 
 11,198
 39,727
 
 22,703
 11,198
 62,430
 73,628
 32,193
 1996 Ocala, FL 
 11,198
 39,727
 
 23,332
 11,198
 63,059
 74,257
 35,797
 1996
Port Charlotte Town Center Port Charlotte, FL 44,021
 5,471
 58,570
 
 16,294
 5,471
 74,864
 80,335
 47,069
 1996 Port Charlotte, FL 42,196
 5,471
 58,570
 
 18,478
 5,471
 77,048
 82,519
 51,342
 1996
Rolling Oaks Mall San Antonio, TX 
 1,929
 38,609
 
 14,119
 1,929
 52,728
 54,657
 36,087
 1988 San Antonio, TX 
 1,929
 38,609
 
 17,630
 1,929
 56,239
 58,168
 39,023
 1988
Rushmore Mall Rapid City, SD 94,000
 18,839
 67,364
 
 14,462
 18,839
 81,826
 100,665
 23,040
 1998
Southern Hills Mall Sioux City, IA 101,500
 15,025
 75,984
 
 1,088
 15,025
 77,072
 92,097
 20,092
 1998 Sioux City, IA 
 15,025
 75,984
 4,566
 4,141
 19,591
 80,125
 99,716
 27,806
 1998
Southern Park Mall Youngstown, OH 
 16,982
 77,767
 97
 33,167
 17,079
 110,934
 128,013
 62,418
 1996 Youngstown, OH 
 16,982
 77,767
 (236) 35,745
 16,746
 113,512
 130,258
 69,461
 1996
Southgate Mall Missoula, MT 35,000
 17,040
 35,896
 
 205
 17,040
 36,101
 53,141
 1,204
 2018
Sunland Park Mall El Paso, TX 
 2,896
 28,900
 
 9,944
 2,896
 38,844
 41,740
 29,452
 1988 El Paso, TX 
 2,896
 28,900
 (171) 7,887
 2,725
 36,787
 39,512
 29,040
 1988
Town Center at Aurora Aurora (Denver), CO 54,250
 9,959
 56,832
 (12) 56,924
 9,947
 113,756
 123,703
 72,478
 1998 Aurora (Denver), CO 52,250
 9,959
 56,832
 9,974
 58,923
 19,933
 115,755
 135,688
 81,675
 1998
Towne West Square Wichita, KS 47,051
 972
 21,203
 22
 13,518
 994
 34,721
 35,715
 24,602
 1980 Wichita, KS 45,205
 972
 21,203
 22
 11,071
 994
 32,274
 33,268
 24,644
 1980
Valle Vista Mall Harlingen, TX 40,000
 1,398
 17,159
 329
 19,578
 1,727
 36,737
 38,464
 26,909
 1983
Waterford Lakes Town Center Orlando, FL 
 8,679
 72,836
 
 23,392
 8,679
 96,228
 104,907
 54,626
 1999 Orlando, FL 
 8,679
 72,836
 
 27,976
 8,679
 100,812
 109,491
 59,588
 1999
Weberstown Mall Stockton, CA 65,000
 9,909
 92,589
 
 3,422
 9,909
 96,011
 105,920
 7,214
 2015 Stockton, CA 65,000
 9,909
 92,589
 
 4,988
 9,909
 97,577
 107,486
 14,723
 2015
West Ridge Mall Topeka, KS 41,413
 5,453
 34,148
 1,168
 25,315
 6,621
 59,463
 66,084
 38,848
 1988 Topeka, KS 39,945
 5,453
 34,148
 (788) 20,642
 4,665
 54,790
 59,455
 37,620
 1988
Westminster Mall Westminster (Los Angeles), CA 81,468
 43,464
 84,709
 
 37,137
 43,464
 121,846
 165,310
 61,035
 1998 Westminster (Los Angeles), CA 78,375
 43,464
 84,709
 (180) 42,567
 43,284
 127,276
 170,560
 68,807
 1998
WestShore Plaza Tampa, FL 99,600
 53,904
 120,191
 
 3,041
 53,904
 123,232
 177,136
 9,243
 2015 Tampa, FL 
 53,904
 120,191
 
 4,755
 53,904
 124,946
 178,850
 17,752
 2015
Open Air Properties  
  
  
  
  
 

 

 

  
  
Bloomingdale Court Bloomingdale (Chicago), IL 
 8,422
 26,184
 (395) 19,017
 8,027
 45,201
 53,228
 29,851
 1987
Bowie Town Center Strip Bowie (Wash, D.C.), MD 
 231
 4,597
 
 819
 231
 5,416
 5,647
 2,741
 2001
Canyon View Marketplace Grand Junction, CO 5,215
 1,370
 9,570
 
 120
 1,370
 9,690
 11,060
 1,057
 2015
Charles Towne Square Charleston, SC 
 
 1,768
 370
 10,890
 370
 12,658
 13,028
 12,209
 1976
Chesapeake Center Chesapeake (Virginia Beach), VA 
 4,410
 11,241
 
 1,504
 4,410
 12,745
 17,155
 10,203
 1996
Concord Mills Marketplace Concord (Charlotte), NC 16,000
 8,036
 21,167
 
 956
 8,036
 22,123
 30,159
 5,795
 2007
Countryside Plaza Countryside (Chicago), IL 
 332
 8,507
 2,554
 12,039
 2,886
 20,546
 23,432
 13,269
 1977
Dare Centre Kill Devil Hills, NC 
 
 5,702
 
 2,405
 
 8,107
 8,107
 4,221
 2004
DeKalb Plaza King of Prussia (Philadelphia), PA 
 1,955
 3,405
 
 1,394
 1,955
 4,799
 6,754
 2,818
 2003
Empire East Sioux Falls, SD 
 3,350
 10,552
 
 2,799
 3,350
 13,351
 16,701
 3,698
 1998
Fairfax Court Fairfax (Wash, D.C.), VA 
 8,078
 34,997
 
 1,470
 8,078
 36,467
 44,545
 6,309
 2014

     Initial Cost 
Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Construction
or Acquisition
 
Gross Amounts At
Which Carried
at Close of Period
         Initial Cost Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Construction
or Acquisition
 Gross Amounts At
Which Carried
at Close of Period
    
Name Location Encumbrances(3) Land 
Buildings and
Improvements
 Land 
Buildings and
Improvements
 Land 
Buildings and
Improvements
 Total(1) 
Accumulated
Depreciation(2)
 
Date of
Construction or
Acquisition
 Location Encumbrances(3) Land Buildings and
Improvements
 Land Buildings and
Improvements
 Land Buildings and
Improvements
 Total(1) Accumulated
Depreciation(2)
 Date of
Construction or
Acquisition
Community Centers  
  
  
  
  
 

 

 

  
  
Bloomingdale Court Bloomingdale (Chicago), IL 
 8,422
 26,184
 
 17,740
 8,422
 43,924
 52,346
 26,638
 1987
Bowie Town Center Strip Bowie (Wash, D.C.), MD 
 231
 4,597
 
 695
 231
 5,292
 5,523
 2,390
 2001
Canyon View Marketplace Grand Junction, CO 5,390
 1,370
 9,570
 
 88
 1,370
 9,658
 11,028
 852
 2015
Charles Towne Square Charleston, SC 
 
 1,768
 370
 10,890
 370
 12,658
 13,028
 11,644
 1976
Chesapeake Center Chesapeake (Virginia Beach), VA 
 4,410
 11,241
 
 994
 4,410
 12,235
 16,645
 9,174
 1996
Concord Mills Marketplace Concord (Charlotte), NC 16,000
 8,036
 21,167
 
 510
 8,036
 21,677
 29,713
 4,019
 2007
Countryside Plaza Countryside (Chicago), IL 
 332
 8,507
 2,554
 11,270
 2,886
 19,777
 22,663
 12,128
 1977
Dare Centre Kill Devil Hills, NC 
 
 5,702
 
 2,200
 
 7,902
 7,902
 3,443
 2004
DeKalb Plaza King of Prussia (Philadelphia), PA 
 1,955
 3,405
 
 824
 1,955
 4,229
 6,184
 2,502
 2003
Empire East Sioux Falls, SD 
 3,350
 10,552
 
 2,728
 3,350
 13,280
 16,630
 2,619
 1998
Fairfax Court Fairfax (Wash, D.C.), VA 
 8,078
 34,997
 
 830
 8,078
 35,827
 43,905
 3,548
 2014
Fairfield Town Center Houston, TX 
 4,745
 5,044
 (2,504) 14,340
 2,241
 19,384
 21,625
 127
 2014 Houston, TX 
 4,745
 5,044
 168
 38,799
 4,913
 43,843
 48,756
 3,889
 2014
Forest Plaza Rockford, IL 16,544
 4,132
 16,818
 453
 15,602
 4,585
 32,420
 37,005
 18,701
 1985 Rockford, IL 15,588
 4,132
 16,818
 453
 12,499
 4,585
 29,317
 33,902
 17,845
 1985
Gaitway Plaza Ocala, FL 
 5,445
 26,687
 
 1,793
 5,445
 28,480
 33,925
 3,834
 2014 Ocala, FL 
 5,445
 26,687
 
 2,293
 5,445
 28,980
 34,425
 5,994
 2014
Gateway Centers Austin, TX 
 24,549
 81,437
 
 20,703
 24,549
 102,140
 126,689
 43,377
 2004
Greenwood Plus Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN 
 1,129
 1,792
 
 4,777
 1,129
 6,569
 7,698
 4,257
 1979 Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN 
 1,129
 1,792
 (58) 4,905
 1,071
 6,697
 7,768
 4,647
 1979
Henderson Square King of Prussia (Philadelphia), PA 12,155
 4,223
 15,124
 
 948
 4,223
 16,072
 20,295
 6,373
 2003 King of Prussia (Philadelphia), PA 
 4,223
 15,124
 
 1,080
 4,223
 16,204
 20,427
 7,228
 2003
Keystone Shoppes Indianapolis, IN 
 
 4,232
 2,118
 4,009
 2,118
 8,241
 10,359
 3,546
 1997 Indianapolis, IN 
 
 4,232
 2,118
 5,356
 2,118
 9,588
 11,706
 4,218
 1997
Lake Plaza Waukegan (Chicago), IL 
 2,487
 6,420
 
 1,763
 2,487
 8,183
 10,670
 5,298
 1986 Waukegan (Chicago), IL 
 2,487
 6,420
 
 2,515
 2,487
 8,935
 11,422
 5,830
 1986
Lake View Plaza Orland Park (Chicago), IL 
 4,702
 17,543
 
 17,055
 4,702
 34,598
 39,300
 20,880
 1986 Orland Park (Chicago), IL 
 4,702
 17,543
 (89) 18,646
 4,613
 36,189
 40,802
 23,456
 1986
Lakeline Plaza Cedar Park (Austin), TX 15,499
 5,822
 30,875
 
 10,274
 5,822
 41,149
 46,971
 22,487
 1998 Cedar Park (Austin), TX 14,604
 5,822
 30,875
 
 14,815
 5,822
 45,690
 51,512
 25,086
 1998
Lima Center Lima, OH 
 1,781
 5,151
 
 9,739
 1,781
 14,890
 16,671
 8,978
 1996 Lima, OH 
 1,781
 5,151
 
 10,056
 1,781
 15,207
 16,988
 10,259
 1996
Lincoln Crossing O'Fallon (St. Louis), IL 
 674
 2,192
 
 9,172
 674
 11,364
 12,038
 2,141
 1990 O'Fallon (St. Louis), IL 
 674
 2,192
 
 9,543
 674
 11,735
 12,409
 3,597
 1990
MacGregor Village Cary, NC 
 502
 8,891
 
 1,109
 502
 10,000
 10,502
 3,448
 2004 Cary, NC 
 502
 8,891
 
 3,053
 502
 11,944
 12,446
 4,527
 2004
Mall of Georgia Crossing Buford (Atlanta), GA 23,197
 9,506
 32,892
 
 2,100
 9,506
 34,992
 44,498
 18,982
 1999 Buford (Atlanta), GA 22,208
 9,506
 32,892
 
 3,011
 9,506
 35,903
 45,409
 20,776
 1999
Markland Plaza Kokomo, IN 
 206
 738
 
 7,825
 206
 8,563
 8,769
 4,942
 1974 Kokomo, IN 
 206
 738
 
 8,300
 206
 9,038
 9,244
 4,919
 1974
Martinsville Plaza Martinsville, VA 
 
 584
 
 487
 
 1,071
 1,071
 934
 1967 Martinsville, VA 
 
 584
 
 3,003
 
 3,587
 3,587
 359
 1967
Matteson Plaza Matteson (Chicago), IL 
 1,771
 9,737
 
 (46) 1,771
 9,691
 11,462
 9,124
 1988 Matteson (Chicago), IL 
 1,771
 9,737
 
 47
 1,771
 9,784
 11,555
 9,655
 1988
Morgantown Commons Morgantown, WV 
 4,850
 13,076
 
 (664) 4,850
 12,412
 17,262
 870
 2015
Muncie Towne Plaza Muncie, IN 6,443
 267
 10,509
 87
 3,576
 354
 14,085
 14,439
 7,405
 1998 Muncie, IN 6,071
 267
 10,509
 87
 3,660
 354
 14,169
 14,523
 8,422
 1998
North Ridge Shopping Center Raleigh, NC 12,264
 385
 12,826
 
 4,897
 385
 17,723
 18,108
 5,615
 2004 Raleigh, NC 11,764
 385
 12,826
 
 7,522
 385
 20,348
 20,733
 7,077
 2004
Northwood Plaza Fort Wayne, IN 
 148
 1,414
 
 3,175
 148
 4,589
 4,737
 2,793
 1974 Fort Wayne, IN 
 148
 1,414
 
 3,481
 148
 4,895
 5,043
 3,140
 1974
Plaza at Buckland Hills, The Manchester, CT 
 17,355
 43,900
 (281) 4,394
 17,074
 48,294
 65,368
 7,049
 2014
Richardson Square Richardson (Dallas), TX 
 6,285
 
 990
 14,818
 7,275
 14,818
 22,093
 6,108
 1996
Rockaway Commons Rockaway (New York), NJ 
 5,149
 26,435
 
 16,447
 5,149
 42,882
 48,031
 20,038
 1998
Rockaway Town Plaza Rockaway (New York), NJ 
 
 18,698
 2,227
 5,187
 2,227
 23,885
 26,112
 9,993
 2004
Royal Eagle Plaza Coral Springs (Miami), FL 
 2,153
 24,216
 
 3,253
 2,153
 27,469
 29,622
 6,509
 2014
Shops at North East Mall, The Hurst (Dallas), TX 
 12,541
 28,177
 402
 7,592
 12,943
 35,769
 48,712
 24,629
 1999
St. Charles Towne Plaza Waldorf (Wash, D.C.), MD 
 8,216
 18,993
 
 10,242
 8,216
 29,235
 37,451
 17,860
 1987
Tippecanoe Plaza Lafayette, IN 
 
 745
 234
 5,821
 234
 6,566
 6,800
 4,216
 1974
University Center Mishawaka, IN 
 2,119
 8,365
 
 5,190
 2,119
 13,555
 15,674
 10,703
 1996
University Town Plaza Pensacola, FL 
 6,009
 26,945
 (579) 381
 5,430
 27,326
 32,756
 8,739
 2013
Village Park Plaza Carmel (Indianapolis), IN 
 19,565
 51,873
 
 1,065
 19,565
 52,938
 72,503
 13,319
 2014
Washington Plaza Indianapolis, IN 
 263
 1,833
 
 3,049
 263
 4,882
 5,145
 4,224
 1996
West Ridge Plaza Topeka, KS 9,986
 1,376
 4,560
 1,958
 8,498
 3,334
 13,058
 16,392
 6,799
 1988
West Town Corners Altamonte Springs (Orlando), FL 
 6,821
 24,603
 (174) 6,901
 6,647
 31,504
 38,151
 6,150
 2014
Westland Park Plaza Orange Park (Jacksonville), FL 
 5,576
 8,775
 
 4
 5,576
 8,779
 14,355
 2,016
 2014
White Oaks Plaza Springfield, IL 12,143
 3,169
 14,267
 292
 11,204
 3,461
 25,471
 28,932
 14,004
 1986

      Initial Cost 
Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Construction
or Acquisition
 
Gross Amounts At
Which Carried
at Close of Period
    
Name Location Encumbrances(3) Land 
Buildings and
Improvements
 Land 
Buildings and
Improvements
 Land 
Buildings and
Improvements
 Total(1) 
Accumulated
Depreciation(2)
 
Date of
Construction or
Acquisition
Palms Crossing McAllen, TX 35,461
 13,496
 45,925
 
 10,669
 13,496
 56,594
 70,090
 22,337
 2007
Plaza at Buckland Hills, The Manchester, CT 
 17,355
 43,900
 
 (938) 17,355
 42,962
 60,317
 3,735
 2014
Richardson Square Richardson (Dallas), TX 
 6,285
 
 990
 15,124
 7,275
 15,124
 22,399
 4,896
 1996
Rockaway Commons Rockaway (New York), NJ 
 5,149
 26,435
 
 15,459
 5,149
 41,894
 47,043
 16,536
 1998
Rockaway Town Plaza Rockaway (New York), NJ 
 
 18,698
 2,227
 4,743
 2,227
 23,441
 25,668
 8,491
 2004
Royal Eagle Plaza Coral Springs (Miami), FL 
 2,153
 24,216
 
 2,713
 2,153
 26,929
 29,082
 3,567
 2014
Shops at Arbor Walk, The Austin, TX 40,078
 
 42,546
 
 5,850
 
 48,396
 48,396
 18,058
 2006
Shops at North East Mall, The Hurst (Dallas), TX 
 12,541
 28,177
 402
 6,483
 12,943
 34,660
 47,603
 22,621
 1999
St. Charles Towne Plaza Waldorf (Wash, D.C.), MD 
 8,216
 18,993
 
 9,271
 8,216
 28,264
 36,480
 15,725
 1987
Tippecanoe Plaza Lafayette, IN 
 
 745
 234
 5,577
 234
 6,322
 6,556
 4,248
 1974
University Center Mishawaka, IN 
 2,119
 8,365
 
 4,134
 2,119
 12,499
 14,618
 9,980
 1996
University Town Plaza Pensacola, FL 
 6,009
 26,945
 (397) 3,312
 5,612
 30,257
 35,869
 7,350
 2013
Village Park Plaza Carmel (Indianapolis), IN 
 19,565
 51,873
 
 650
 19,565
 52,523
 72,088
 7,574
 2014
Washington Plaza Indianapolis, IN 
 263
 1,833
 
 2,781
 263
 4,614
 4,877
 3,992
 1996
West Ridge Plaza Topeka, KS 10,353
 1,376
 4,560
 
 4,546
 1,376
 9,106
 10,482
 4,728
 1988
West Town Corners Altamonte Springs (Orlando), FL 
 6,821
 24,603
 
 2,501
 6,821
 27,104
 33,925
 3,198
 2014
Westland Park Plaza Orange Park (Jacksonville), FL 
 5,576
 8,775
 
 (186) 5,576
 8,589
 14,165
 1,090
 2014
White Oaks Plaza Springfield, IL 12,887
 3,169
 14,267
 292
 9,061
 3,461
 23,328
 26,789
 11,997
 1986
Whitehall Mall Whitehall, PA 9,266
 8,500
 28,512
 
 3,049
 8,500
 31,561
 40,061
 3,712
 2014
Wolf Ranch Georgetown (Austin), TX 
 21,999
 51,547
 
 14,126
 21,999
 65,673
 87,672
 27,261
 2005
Corporate Assets    
  
  
  
  
 

 

 
  
  
Corporate Investment in Real Estate Assets Columbus, OH 
 
 2,103
 
 (2,400) 
 (297) (297) (17) 2015
Developments In Progress  
  
  
  
  
 

 

 
  
  
Fairfield Town Center Houston, TX 
 
 
 
 
 5,047
 20,373
 25,420
    
The Mall at Fairfield Commons Beavercreek, OH 
 
 
 
 
 
 1,722
 1,722
 
  
Oklahoma City Properties - Kensington Oklahoma City, OK 
 
 
 
 
 2,132
 
 2,132
 
  
Other Developments 
 
 
 
 
 3,660
 15,279
 18,939
 
  
    $1,610,429

$871,835

$4,024,545

$23,286

$1,237,508

$905,960

$5,299,427

$6,205,387

$2,063,107
  
      Initial Cost Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Construction
or Acquisition
 Gross Amounts At
Which Carried
at Close of Period
    
Name Location Encumbrances(3) Land Buildings and
Improvements
 Land Buildings and
Improvements
 Land Buildings and
Improvements
 Total(1) Accumulated
Depreciation(2)
 Date of
Construction or
Acquisition
Whitehall Mall Whitehall, PA 
 8,500
 28,512
 
 4,680
 8,500
 33,192
 41,692
 7,860
 2014
Wolf Ranch Georgetown (Austin), TX 
 21,999
 51,547
 (185) 13,815
 21,814
 65,362
 87,176
 31,398
 2005
Developments In Progress  
  
  
  
  
 

 

 
  
  
Cottonwood Mall Albuquerque, NM 
 
 
 
 
 826
 1,525
 2,351
 
  
Dayton Mall Dayton, OH 
 
 
 
 
 
 1,828
 1,828
 
  
Fairfield Town Center Houston, TX 
 
 
 
 
 3,203
 779
 3,982
 
  
Grand Central Mall Parkersburg, WV 
 
 
 
 
 
 1,362
 1,362
 
  
Great Lakes Mall Mentor (Cleveland), OH 
 
 
 
 
 
 6,243
 6,243
 
  
MacGregor Village Cary, NC 
 
 
 
 
 
 1,790
 1,790
 
  
Northwoods Mall Peoria, IL 
 
 
 
 
 117
 2,595
 2,712
 
  
Southern Park Mall Youngstown, OH 
 
 
 
 
 
 1,293
 1,293
 
  
WestShore Plaza Tampa, FL 
 
 
 
 
 
 6,700
 6,700
 
  
Other Developments 
 
 
 
 
 1,200
 12,307
 13,507
 
  
    $980,276

$782,921

$3,607,440

$47,947

$1,337,077

$836,214

$4,980,939

$5,817,153

$2,212,476
  
Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P.
Notes to Schedule III
December 31, 20162018
(dollars in thousands)



(1)Reconciliation of Real Estate Properties:
The changes in real estate assets (which excludes furniture, fixtures and equipment) for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 are as follows:
 2016 2015 2014 2018 2017 2016
Balance, beginning of year $6,699,789
 $5,227,466
 $4,724,930
 $5,715,996
 $6,205,387
 $6,699,789
Acquisitions 297
 3,113,240
 471,293
 72,647
 14,366
 297
Improvements 157,561
 153,536
 80,059
 143,123
 135,713
 157,561
Held for sale reclasses (215,244) (166,742) 
 
 
 (215,244)
Disposals* (437,016) (1,627,711) (48,816) (114,613) (639,470) (437,016)
Balance, end of year $6,205,387
 $6,699,789
 $5,227,466
 $5,817,153
 $5,715,996
 $6,205,387
*Primarily represents properties that have been deconsolidated upon sale of controlling interest, sold properties and fully depreciated assets which have been disposed. Further, includes impairment charges of $0, $66,925, and $21,879 for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The following reconciles investment properties at cost per the consolidated balance sheet to the balance per Schedule III as of December 31, 2016:2018:
 2016 2018
Investment properties at cost $6,294,628
 $5,914,705
Less: furniture, fixtures and equipment (89,241) (97,552)
Total cost per Schedule III $6,205,387
 $5,817,153
The unaudited aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes of real estate assets presented was $5,775,588$5,334,779 as of December 31, 2016.2018.
(2)Reconciliation of Accumulated Depreciation:
The changes in accumulated depreciation and amortization for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 are as follows:
 2016 2015 2014 2018 2017 2016
Balance, beginning of year $2,261,593
 $2,058,061
 $1,920,476
 $2,076,948
 $2,063,107
 $2,261,593
Depreciation expense 222,861
 232,735
 172,337
 205,724
 205,078
 222,861
Disposals (421,347) (29,203) (34,752) (70,196) (191,237) (421,347)
Balance, end of year $2,063,107
 $2,261,593
 $2,058,061
 $2,212,476
 $2,076,948
 $2,063,107
The following reconciles accumulated depreciation per the consolidated balance sheet to the balance per Schedule III as of December 31, 2016:2018:
 2016 2018
Accumulated depreciation $2,122,572
 $2,283,764
Less: furniture, fixtures and equipment (59,465) (71,288)
Total accumulated depreciation per Schedule III $2,063,107
 $2,212,476
Depreciation of our investment in buildings and improvements reflected in the combinedconsolidated statements of operations is generally calculated over the estimated original lives of the assets as noted below:
Buildings and Improvements—typically 10-40 years for the structure, 15 years for landscaping and parking lot, and 10 years for HVAC equipment.
Tenant Allowances and Improvements—shorter of lease term or useful life.
(3)Encumbrances represent face amount of mortgage debt and exclude any fair value adjustments.adjustments and debt issuance costs.

F-56