UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20192021
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________to__________
Commission File Number: 001-36523 (Urban Edge Properties)
Commission File Number: 333-212951-01 (Urban Edge Properties LP)
URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES
URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES LP
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland(Urban Edge Properties)47-6311266
Delaware(Urban Edge Properties LP)36-4791544
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
Maryland(Urban Edge Properties)47-6311266
Delaware(Urban Edge Properties LP)36-4791544
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
888 Seventh Avenue,New York,New York10019
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number including area code:(212)956‑2556
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Urban Edge Properties
Title of Each Class
Trading symbol

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Shares, $.01 par value per shareUENew York Stock Exchange
Urban Edge Properties LP
Title of Each Class
Trading symbol

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
NoneN/AN/A
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Urban Edge Properties: None        Urban Edge Properties LP: None     

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Urban Edge Properties    Yes x   NO o         Urban Edge Properties LP     Yes x   NO o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Urban Edge Properties    YES o   No x         Urban Edge Properties LP     YES o   No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Urban Edge Properties    Yes x   NO o         Urban Edge Properties LP     Yes  x   NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).  
Urban Edge Properties    Yes x   NO o         Urban Edge Properties LP     Yes x   NO o



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Urban Edge Properties:
Large Accelerated Filer
Accelerated Filer o
Non-Accelerated Filer o
Smaller Reporting CompanyEmerging Growth Company
Urban Edge Properties LP:
Large Accelerated Filer o
Accelerated Filer o
Non-Accelerated FilerSmaller Reporting CompanyEmerging Growth Company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Urban Edge Properties o                   Urban Edge Properties LP o   

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
        Urban Edge Properties ☒                 Urban Edge Properties LP ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Urban Edge Properties    YES    NO x         Urban Edge Properties LP     YES    NO x

As of June 28, 2019,30, 2021, the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the Common Shares held by nonaffiliatesnon-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $2.1$2.2 billion based upon the last reported sale price of $17.33$19.10 per share on the New York Stock Exchange on such date.

As of January 31, 2020,February 9, 2022, Urban Edge Properties had 121,386,592117,398,896 common shares outstanding. There is no public trading market for the common units of Urban Edge Properties LP. As a result, the aggregate market value of the common units held by non-affiliates of Urban Edge Properties LP cannot be determined.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part III incorporates by reference information from certain portions of the Urban Edge Properties’ definite proxy statement for the 20202022 annual meeting of shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the close of the fiscal year.






EXPLANATORY NOTE
This report combines the annual reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20192021 of Urban Edge Properties and Urban Edge Properties LP. Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references to “UE” and “Urban Edge” mean Urban Edge Properties, a Maryland real estate investment trust (“REIT”), and references to “UELP” and the “Operating Partnership” mean Urban Edge Properties LP, a Delaware limited partnership. References to the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” mean collectively UE, UELP and those entities/subsidiaries consolidated by UE.
UELP is the entity through which we conduct substantially all of our business and own, either directly or through subsidiaries, substantially all of our assets. UE is the sole general partner and also a limited partner of UELP. As the sole general partner of UELP, UE has exclusive control of UELP’s day-to-day management.
As of December 31, 2019,2021, UE owned an approximate 95.4%96.2% ownership interest in UELP. The remaining approximate 4.6%3.8% interest is owned by other limited partners. The other limited partners of UELP are members of management, our Board of Trustees and contributors of property interests acquired. Under the limited partnership agreement of UELP, unitholders may present their common units of UELP for redemption at any time (subject to restrictions agreed upon at the time of issuance of the units that may restrict such right for a period of time). Upon presentation of a common unit for redemption, UELP must redeem the unit for cash equal to the then value of a share of UE’s common shares, as defined by the limited partnership agreement. In lieu of cash redemption by UELP, however, UE may elect to acquire any common units so tendered by issuing common shares of UE in exchange for the common units. If UE so elects, its common shares will be exchanged for common units on a one-for-one basis. This one-for-one exchange ratio is subject to specified adjustments to prevent dilution. UE generally expects that it will elect to issue its common shares in connection with each such presentation for redemption rather than having UELP pay cash. With each such exchange or redemption, UE’s percentage ownership in UELP will increase. In addition, whenever UE issues common shares other than to acquire common units of UELP, UE must contribute any net proceeds it receives to UELP and UELP must issue to UE an equivalent number of common units of UELP. This structure is commonly referred to as an umbrella partnership REIT, or UPREIT.
The Company believes that combining the annual reports on Form 10-K of UE and UELP into this single report provides the following benefits:
enhances investors’ understanding of UE and UELP by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business;
eliminates duplicative disclosure and provides a more streamlined and readable presentation because a substantial portion of the disclosure applies to both UE and UELP; and
creates time and cost efficiencies throughout the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.
The Company believes it is important to understand the few differences between UE and UELP in the context of how UE and UELP operate as a consolidated company. The financial results of UELP are consolidated into the financial statements of UE. UE does not have any other significant assets, liabilities or operations, other than its investment in UELP, nor does it have employees of its own. UELP, not UE, generally executes all significant business relationships other than transactions involving the securities of UE. UELP holds substantially all of the assets of UE.UE and retains the ownership interests in the Company's joint ventures. UELP conducts the operations of the business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for the net proceeds from equity offerings by UE, which are contributed to the capital of UELP in exchange for units of limited partnership in UELP, as applicable, UELP generates all remaining capital required by the Company’s business. These sources may include working capital, net cash provided by operating activities, borrowings under the revolving credit agreement, the issuance of secured and unsecured debt and equity securities and proceeds received from the disposition of certain properties.
Shareholders’ equity, partners’ capital and noncontrolling interests are the main areas of difference between the consolidated financial statements of UE and UELP. The limited partners of UELP are accounted for as partners’ capital in UELP’s financial statements and as noncontrolling interests in UE’s financial statements. The noncontrolling interests in UELP’s financial statements include the interests of unaffiliated partners in consolidated entities. The noncontrolling interests in UE’s financial statements include the same noncontrolling interests at UELP’s level and limited partners of UELP. The differences between shareholders’ equity and partners’ capital result from differences in the equity issued at UE and UELP levels.
To help investors better understand the key differences between UE and UELP, certain information for UE and UELP in this report has been separated, as set forth below: Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements which includes specific disclosures for UE and UELP, and Note 14, Equity and Noncontrolling Interests and Note 16, Earnings Per Share and Unit and Note 17 thereto, Quarterly Financial Data.Unit.
This report also includes separate Part II, Item 9A. Controls and Procedures sections and separate Exhibits 31 and 32 certifications for each of UE and UELP in order to establish that the requisite certifications have been made and that UE and UELP are compliant with Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. §1350.





URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES AND URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES LP
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20192021

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Business
Item 1A.Risk Factors
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2.Properties
Item 3.Legal Proceedings
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures
PART II
Item 5.Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Item 6.Selected Financial Data[Reserved]
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures
Item 9B.Other Information
Item 9C.Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
PART III
PART III
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
Item 11.Executive Compensation
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services
PART IV
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Item 16.Form 10-K Summary
Signatures






FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained herein constitute forward-looking statements as such term is defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. They represent our intentions, plans, expectations and beliefs and are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Our future results, financial condition and business may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. You can identify many of these statements by words such as “approximates,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “would,” “may” or other similar expressions in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Many of the factors that will determine the outcome of forward-looking statements are beyond our ability to control or predict and include, among others: (i) the economic, political and social impact of, and uncertainty relating to, the COVID-19 pandemic, including its impact on our retail tenants and their ability to make rent and other payments or honor their commitments under existing leases; (ii) the loss or bankruptcy of major tenants; (iii) the ability and willingness of the Company’s tenants to renew their leases with the Company upon expiration, the Company’s ability to re-lease its properties on the same or better terms, or at all, in the event of non-renewal or in the event the Company exercises its right to replace an existing tenant; (iv) the impact of e-commerce on our tenants’ business; (v) macroeconomic conditions, such as a disruption of, or lack of access to the capital markets, as well as potential volatility in the Company’s share price; (vi) the Company’s success in implementing its business strategy and its ability to identify, underwrite, finance, consummate and integrate diversifying acquisitions and investments; (vii) changes in general economic conditions or economic conditions in the markets in which the Company competes, and their effect on the Company’s revenues, earnings and funding sources, and on those of its tenants; (viii) increases in the Company’s borrowing costs as a result of changes in interest rates and other factors, including the discontinuation of USD LIBOR, which is currently anticipated to occur in 2023; (ix) the Company’s ability to pay down, refinance, restructure or extend its indebtedness as it becomes due and potential limitations on the Company’s ability to borrow funds under its existing credit facility as a result of covenants relating to the Company’s financial results; (x) potentially higher costs associated with the Company’s development, redevelopment and anchor repositioning projects, and the Company’s ability to lease the properties at projected rates; (xi) the Company’s liability for environmental matters; (xii) damage to the Company’s properties from catastrophic weather and other natural events, and the physical effects of climate change; (xiii) the Company’s ability and willingness to maintain its qualification as a REIT in light of economic, market, legal, tax and other considerations; (xiv) information technology security breaches; and (xv) the loss of key executives. For further discussion of factors that could materially affect the outcome of our forward-looking statements, see “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021. A reader should also review carefully our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in this Report.

We claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for any forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. We do not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to our forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.BUSINESS
ITEM 1.BUSINESS
The Company

Urban Edge Properties (“UE”, “Urban Edge” or the “Company”) (NYSE: UE) is a Maryland REIT that manages, develops, redevelops, and acquires retail real estate, primarily in the Washington, D.C. to Boston corridor with a concentration on the New York metropolitan area. Urban Edge Properties LP (“UELP” or the “Operating Partnership”) is a Delaware limited partnership formed to serve as UE’s majority-owned partnership subsidiary and to own, through affiliates, all of our real estate and other assets. UE and UELP were created in 2014 to own the majority of Vornado Realty Trust’s (“Vornado”) (NYSE: VNO) former shopping center business (the “UE Business”), and separated from Vornado in January 2015. Our portfolio is currently comprised of 7468 shopping centers, fourfive malls and a warehouse parktwo industrial parks totaling approximately 15.217.0 million square feet (sf) with a consolidated occupancy rate of 92.9%88.8%.
UnlessFor additional information on recent business developments, see Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



1


Company Strategies
Our goal is to be a leading owner and operator of retail real estate in major urban markets, with a focus on the context otherwise requires, “we”, “us”Washington, D.C. to Boston corridor. We believe urban markets offer attractive acquisition and “our” referredevelopment opportunities resulting from high population density, strong demand from consumers, above average retailer sales trends, a limited supply of institutional quality assets and a large number of older, undermanaged assets that remain privately owned. We seek to UE after giving effectcreate value through the following primary strategies:

Maximize the value of existing properties through proactive management. We intend to maximize the value of each of our assets through comprehensive, proactive management encompassing: continuous asset evaluation for highest-and-best-use; targeted leasing to desirable tenants; and efficient and cost-conscious day-to-day operations that minimize operating expenses and enhance property quality. Repurposing retail real estate with high-quality retailers, with a focus on grocers, and incorporating other uses including industrial, residential, self-storage, and medical are increasingly important to our business plan. Leasing and asset management add value through:
Monitoring retailer sales, merchandising, store operations, timeliness of payments, overall financial condition and related factors;
Being consistently aware of each asset’s competitive position within its trade area and recommending physical improvements or adjusting merchandising if circumstances warrant;
Continuously canvassing trade areas to identify unique operators that can distinguish a property and enhance its offerings;
Maintaining regular contact with the brokerage community to stay abreast of new merchants, potential relocations, new supply and overall trade area dynamics;
Conducting regular portfolio reviews with key merchants;
Building and nurturing deep relationships with tenant decision-makers;
Focusing on spaces with below-market leases that might be recaptured;
Understanding the impact of options, exclusives, co-tenancy and other restrictive lease provisions; and
Optimizing required capital investment in every transaction.

Develop and redevelop assets to their highest and best use. Our existing portfolio presents considerable opportunity to generate additional income at attractive returns by redeveloping underutilized existing space, developing new space through expanding our properties and developing pad sites, and incorporating non-retail uses such as industrial, multifamily, office, self-storage and other uses. As of December 31, 2021, we have $218.7 million of active redevelopment projects, of which $146.6 million remains to be funded. These projects are expected to generate an approximate 8% unleveraged yield. Active redevelopment projects include $102.2 million of projects related to anchor leases executed during the year. We will continue to explore opportunities throughout our portfolio to achieve similar upgrades in tenancy, to densify sites where feasible and to repurpose certain retail space to non-retail uses.

Invest in target markets. We intend to selectively deploy capital through acquisitions in our target markets that meet our criteria for risk-adjusted returns and enhance the overall quality of our existing portfolio. At the same time, we plan to sell assets that no longer meet our return requirements and strategic objectives. Investment considerations for acquisitions include:
Competition and Barriers-to-Entry: We seek assets in underserved, high barrier-to-entry markets in densely populated, affluent trade areas. We believe that properties located in such markets present more attractive risk-return profile relative to other markets.
Geography: We focus primarily on the Washington, D.C. to Boston corridor with a concentration on the New York metropolitan area. We intend to invest in our existing core markets, and, over time, may expand into new markets that have similar characteristics.
Product: We generally seek large properties that provide scale relative to the transfercompetition and optionality for redevelopment to meet the changing demands of the UE Businesslocal community.
Tenancy: We consider tenant mix, sales performance and related occupancy cost, lease term, lease provisions, omni-channel capabilities, susceptibility to e-commerce disruption and other factors. Our tenant base comprises a diverse group of merchants, including department stores, supermarkets, discounters, entertainment offerings, health clubs, DIY stores, in-line specialty shops, restaurants and other food and beverage vendors and service providers.
2


Rent: We derive our revenue from Vornado,fixed and variable rents from our tenants. We consider existing rents relative to market rents and target submarkets that have potential for periods priormarket rent growth as evidenced by strong retailer sales performance.
Access and Visibility: We seek assets with convenient access and good visibility.
Physical Condition: We consider aesthetics, functionality, building and site conditions and environmental matters in evaluating asset quality.
Maintain capital discipline. We intend to such transfer, referkeep our balance sheet flexible and capable of supporting growth. We expect to generate increasing levels of cash flow from internally generated funds and to have substantial borrowing capacity under our existing revolving credit agreement, general access to equity markets and from potential secured debt financing on our existing assets.

Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Achievements, Initiatives, and Objectives

We seek to drive financial performance while engaging in environmentally and socially responsible business practices grounded in sound corporate governance. We believe that disclosure around our ESG practices allows our stakeholders to see our company holistically and understand its trajectory beyond fundamentals and financial metrics. In addition to a dedicated team of professionals, we have a robust suite of environmental, social, and governance policies that inform and guide our ESG approach and drive our ESG goals forward. We have aligned our sustainability practices in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative (“GRI”) standards and commensurate with the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (“SASB”) and the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”) frameworks. In line with our corporate transparency, we have completed our first Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmarks (“GRESB”) submission and will continue to benchmark our progress against our peers. We routinely reassess our plans and policies to evaluate compliance with regional and national requirements as well as industry best practices.
From an environmental perspective, we have implemented and plan to continue to implement policies and practices with the goal of supporting the continued reduction of energy (thereby reducing greenhouse gas emissions), water, and waste production across the portfolio. Initiatives we have taken include the installation of energy-efficient roofing, LED lighting retrofits, electric vehicle charging stations and waste recycling and management. Additionally, we are continuing to research solar and alternative energy options to further reduce our consumption and carbon footprint. We are committed to maintaining sustainable operations and believe that our long-term sustainability goals will provide positive financial and environmental outcomes for shareholders, tenants, employees and the communities in which we invest.
We believe that through our business, we are able to provide the communities in which we operate a welcoming and safe environment for our tenants and customers to connect and engage with one another. We consciously choose to add retailers that we believe are needed to neighborhoods lacking vital resources and reposition spaces with uses that appeal to the UE Business while ownedrespective communities where the properties are located. Our community involvement also includes donations to various charitable organizations, hospitals and COVID-19 relief funds as well as food, coat and clothing drives. Many of these organizations and drives directly benefit the people and neighborhoods in which our properties are located.
Our corporate governance standards and policies aim to promote ethical conduct, fair dealing, transparency and accountability. The Company is governed by Vornado.a ten-member board comprised primarily of independent trustees. The Board of Trustees is focused on independence, diversity of thought and experience, and ethical leadership and is critical in the oversight of our risk-management processes. Additionally, we have three board committees made up of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, each of which addresses risks specific to their respective functional responsibilities and works closely with the Board of Trustees. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines are re-evaluated annually, taking into account changing circumstances to ensure that the best interests of the Company and our shareholders are met. We maintain additional policies including our Code of Ethics, Conflict of Interest Policy, and Whistleblower Policy, on which all employees are trained.
Further information on our ESG practices can be found on our website in the Investors section. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Human Capital

At December 31, 2021, we had 116 employees. We believe that our people are our most valuable asset. Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to continue to attract, hire, and retain qualified personnel. Accordingly, we strive to offer competitive salaries and employee benefits to all employees and monitor salaries in our market areas. We provide professional training and development workshops and aim to provide a workplace environment where employees are informed, engaged, feel empowered, and can succeed. As part of our employee development, we have launched an employee-performance tracking
3


platform which serves as a year-round benchmark tool and allows employees and managers to take notes, set goals and track progress.
Our employees enjoy subsidized health and wellness benefits, professional training and development workshops, ergonomic office equipment, telecommuting opportunities and policies encouraging work/life balance. We have created an employee wellness program which spans the entire year and focuses on five pillars of health and wellness, both inside and outside of the office. The areas of focus for this program include financial, emotional, physical, social and community wellness. Each month there is a theme with associated activities and employee incentives including the ability to earn additional money for health savings accounts and raffles for prizes.
We understand the importance of work/life balance and allow employees the flexibility to maintain a hybrid in-office and remote working schedule. We provide all employees with the equipment and resources necessary to work and perform their duties in a remote setting. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we have implemented enhanced cleaning protocols within our offices and our properties to promote employee health and safety, which include cleaning and disinfecting high-touch surfaces daily, providing hand sanitizer and personal protective equipment such as face masks.
Diversity, equity and inclusion (“DE&I”) are an integral part of our culture. We believe that a diverse workforce and an inclusive culture promotes growth, both personally and professionally, and is an important aspect in our ability to attract and retain talented employees. All employees are required to complete trainings on DE&I which cover a range of topics including best practices and education on unconscious bias. We aim to create an equitable workplace for all and our CEO has signed the CEO Diversity and Inclusion Action Pledge on behalf of our Company, joining thousands of other CEOs and peers across the country to cultivate a trusting environment where our employees feel comfortable and are empowered to have discussions about diversity and inclusion.
Through our Wellness program, health and safety protocols and quarterly town hall meetings with all employees, among other initiatives, we continually strive to provide a workplace environment where employees are informed, engaged, feel empowered and can succeed.
Our headquarters are located at 888 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10019.

Significant Tenants

None of our tenants accounted for more than 10% of total revenues in any of the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019. The TJX Companies, Inc. is our largest tenant and accounted for approximately $20.6 million, or 4.8%, of our total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021.

REIT Qualification

The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT under sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), commencing with the filing of its 2015 tax return for its tax year ended December 31, 2015. With the exception of the Company’s taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”), to the extent the Company meets certain requirements under the Code, the Company will not be taxed on its federal taxable income. If we fail to qualify as a REIT for any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any alternative minimum tax, which, for corporations, was repealed under the Tax Cut and Jobs Act (“TCJA”) for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for the four subsequent taxable years. In addition to its TRS, the Company is subject to certain foreign and state and local income taxes, including a 29% non-resident withholding tax onin particular income taxes arising from its twooperating activities in Puerto Rico, malls, which are included in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income.

Company Strategies

Our goal is to be a leading owner and operator of retail real estate in major urban markets, with a focus on the New York metropolitan area. We believe urban markets offer attractive acquisition and redevelopment opportunities resulting from high population density, strong demand from consumers for differentiated live-work-play environments with access to public transportation, above average retailer sales trends, a limited supply of institutional quality assets and a strong supply of older, undermanaged assets that remain privately owned. We seek to create value through the following primary strategies:

Maximizing the value of existing properties through proactive management. We intend to maximize the value of each of our assets through comprehensive, proactive management encompassing: continuous asset evaluation for highest-and-best-use; efficient and cost-conscious day-to-day operations that minimize retailer operating expense and enhance property quality; and targeted leasing to desirable tenants. Leasing is a critical value-creation function that includes:
Monitoring retailer sales, merchandising, store operations, timeliness of payments, overall financial condition and related factors;
Being constantly aware of each asset’s competitive position and recommending physical improvements or adjusting merchandising if circumstances warrant;
Continuously canvassing trade areas to identify unique operators that can distinguish a property and enhance its offerings;
Maintaining regular contact with the brokerage community to stay abreast of new merchants, potential relocations, new supply and overall trade area dynamics;
Conducting regular portfolio reviews with key merchants;
Building and nurturing deep relationships with retailer decision-makers;
Focusing on spaces with below-market leases that might be recaptured;
Understanding the impact of options, exclusives, co-tenancy and other restrictive lease provisions; and
Optimizing required capital investment in every transaction.



Actively investing. We intend to acquire properties in our target markets that meet our criteria for risk-adjusted returns and enhance the overall quality of our existing portfolio.

Investment considerations include:
Geography: We focus primarily on the New York metropolitan area and secondarily on the Washington, DC to Boston corridor. We intend to invest in our existing core markets, and, overtime, may expand into new markets that have similar characteristics.
Product: We generally seek large properties that provide scale relative to the competition and optionality for redevelopment to meet the changing demands of the local community.
Tenancy: We consider tenant mix, sales performance and related occupancy cost, lease term, lease provisions, omni-channel capabilities, susceptibility to e-commerce disruption and other factors. Our tenant base comprises a diverse group of merchants, including department stores, supermarkets, discounters, entertainment offerings, health clubs, DIY stores, in-line specialty shops, restaurants and other food and beverage vendors and service providers.
Rent: We consider existing rents relative to market rents and target submarkets that have potential for market rent growth as evidenced by strong retailer sales performance.
Competition and Barriers-to-Entry: We seek assets in underserved, high barrier-to-entry markets in densely populated, affluent trade areas. We believe that properties located in such markets present more attractive risk-return profile relative to other markets.
Access and Visibility: We seek assets with convenient access and good visibility.
Physical Condition: We consider aesthetics, functionality, building and site conditions and environmental matters in evaluating asset quality.
Constantly evaluating our portfolio and, where appropriate, engaging in selective dispositions. We regularly evaluate each property and intend to dispose of those properties that do not meet our investment criteria.
Maintaining capital discipline. We intend to keep our balance sheet flexible and capable of supporting growth. We expect to generate increasing levels of cash flow from internally generated funds and to have substantial borrowing capacity under our existing revolving credit agreement and from potential secured debt financing on our existing assets.

Significant Tenants

None of our tenants accounted for more than 10% of total revenues in any of the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. The Home Depot, Inc. is our largest tenant and accounted for approximately $23.0 million, or 5.9% of our total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Employees

Our headquarters are located at 888 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10019. As of December 31, 2019, we had 117 employees.

Available Information

Copies of our Annual Reports on Form 10‑K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10‑Q, Current Reports on Form 8‑K, and amendments to those reports, as well as Reports on Forms 3, 4 and 5 regarding officers, trustees or 10% beneficial owners of us, filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a), 15(d) or 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), are available free of charge through our website (www.uedge.com) as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Also available on our website are copies of our Audit Committee Charter, Compensation Committee Charter, Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Charter, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Corporate Governance Guidelines. In the event of any changes to these charters or the code or guidelines, changed copies will also be made available on our website. Copies of these documents are also available directly from us free of charge. Our website also includes other financial information, including certain non-GAAP financial measures, none of which is a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Copies of our charters, code, guidelines, and filings under the Exchange Act are also available free of charge from us, upon request.

4
2



ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Risk factors that may materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition are summarized below. These risks have been separated into threethe following groups: (1)
Risks Related to Our Business and OperationsOperations;
Risks Related to Our Liquidity and Indebtedness;
Risks Related to Business Continuity;
Risks Related to Environmental Liability and Regulatory Compliance;
Risks Related to Our Status as a REIT, (2) Risks Related to Our Common Shares and (3) REIT;
Risks Related to Our Organization and Structure. Structure; and
Risks Related to An Investment in Our Common Shares.
The risks and uncertainties described herein may not be the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial, may also adversely affect our business. See “Forward-Looking Statements” contained herein..

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS AND OPERATIONS AND TO OUR STATUS AS A REIT

There are inherent risksActual or perceived threats associated with real estate investmentsepidemics, pandemics or other public health crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic, have had and could have a material adverse effect on our and our tenants’ businesses, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, liquidity, and ability to access the real estate industry,capital markets and satisfy debt service obligations.
Epidemics, pandemics or other public health crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic, that impact economic and market conditions, particularly retail real estate, eachin the markets where our properties are located, and preventative measures taken to alleviate their impact, may have a material adverse effect on our and our tenants’ businesses, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and ability to access capital markets and satisfy debt service obligations.
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and restrictions intended to prevent and mitigate its spread have had, and could continue to have, additional adverse effects on our business, including with regards to:
the ability and willingness of our tenants to renew their leases upon expiration, our ability to re-lease the properties on the same or better terms in the event of nonrenewal or in the event we exercise our right to replace an existing tenant, and obligations we may incur in connection with the replacement of an existing tenant;
anticipated returns from development and redevelopment projects, some of which could have an adverseexperienced delays due to the COVID-19 pandemic;
the broader impact of the pandemic and its effect on consumer behavior;
our ability to pay down, refinance, restructure or extend our indebtedness as it becomes due and potential limitations on our ability to borrow funds under our credit facility as a result of covenants relating to our financial performanceresults; and
the valuepotential reduction in our operating effectiveness if key personnel become unavailable due to illness or other personal circumstances related to COVID-19.
While the U.S. economy has shown signs of improvement compared to fiscal year 2020 and widespread use of vaccines has alleviated COVID-19 restrictions, the spread of new strains of the COVID-19 virus is likely to pose additional challenges. Accordingly, developments regarding the COVID-19 pandemic preclude prediction as to the ultimate economic, political and social impact, and may continue to present material risks and uncertainties with respect to our properties.and our tenants’ business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity and ability to access the capital markets and satisfy debt service obligations.
Real estate investments are subject to various risks, many of which are beyond our control. Our operating and financial performance andTo the value of our properties can be affected by manyextent any of these risks including, but not limited to, the following:
the convenience and quality of competing retail properties and other retailing platforms such as e-commerce;
local real estate conditions, such as an oversupply of retail space or a reduction in demand for retail space, resulting in vacancies or compromising our ability to rent space on favorable terms;
adverse changesuncertainties adversely impact us in the financial conditionways described above or otherwise, they may also have the effect of tenants at our properties, including financial difficulties, lease defaults or bankruptcies;heightening many of the other risks described under this section.
national, regional and local economies, which may be negatively impacted by inflation, deflation, government deficits, high unemployment rates, severe weather or other natural disasters, decreased consumer confidence, industry slowdowns, reduced corporate profits, lack of liquidity and other adverse business conditions;
civil unrest, acts of war, terrorist attacks and natural or man-made disasters, including seismic activity and floods, which may result in uninsured and underinsured losses;
changes in the enforcement or creation of laws, regulations and governmental policies, including, without limitation, health, safety, environmental, zoning and tax laws, government fiscal policies and the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”);
the illiquid nature of real estate investments, which may limit our ability to sell properties at the terms desired or at terms favorable to us;
competition for investment opportunities from other real estate investors with significant capital, including other REITs, real estate operating companies and institutional investment funds; and
fluctuations in interest rates and the availability and cost of financing, which could adversely affect our ability and the ability of potential buyers and tenants of our properties, to obtain financing on favorable terms or at all.
During a period of economic slowdown or recession, or the public perception that such a period may occur, declining demand for real estate could result in a general decline in rents or an increased incidence of defaults among our existing tenants, and, consequently, our properties may fail to generate revenues sufficient to meet operating, debt service and other expenses. As a result, we may have to borrow funds to cover fixed costs, and our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. As such, the market price of our common shares, and our ability to service debt obligations and pay dividends and other distributions to security holders could be adversely affected.

E-commerce may have an adverse impact on our tenants and our business.
E-commerce continues to gain popularity and growth in Internet sales is likely to continue in the future. E-commerce could result in a downturn in the business of some of our current tenants and could affect the way other current and future tenants lease space. For example, the migration towards e-commerce has led many omnichannel retailers to prune the number and size
5


of their traditional “brick and mortar” locations to increasingly rely on e-commerce and alternative distribution channels. Many tenants also permit merchandise purchased on their websites to be picked up at, or returned to, their physical store locations, which may have the effect of decreasing the reported amount of their in-store sales and the amount of rent we are able to collect from them (particularly with respect to those tenants who pay rent based on a percentage of their in-store sales). We cannot predict with certainty how growth in e-commerce will impact the demand for space at our properties or how much revenue will be generated at traditional store locations in the future. If the shift towards e-commerce causes declines in the “brick and mortar” sales generated by our tenants and/or causes our tenants to reduce the size or number of their retail locations in the future, our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.


Retail real estate is a competitive business.
Competition in the retail real estate industry is intense. We compete with a large number of public and private retail real estate companies, including property owners and developers. We compete with these companies to attract customers to our properties, as well as to attract anchor, non-anchor and other tenants. We also compete with these companies for development, redevelopment and acquisition opportunities. Other owners and developers may attempt to take existing tenants from our shopping centers by offering lower rents or other incentives to compel them to relocate. This competition could have a material adverse effect on our ability to lease space and on the amount of rent and expense reimbursements that we receive.

We depend on leasing space to tenants on economically favorable terms and on collecting rent from tenants who ultimately may not be able to pay.
Our financial results depend significantly on leasing space in our properties to tenants on economically favorable terms. A majority of our income depends on the ability of our tenants to pay the full amount of rent and other charges due under their leases on a timely basis. Some of our leases provide for the payment, in addition to base rent, of additional rent above the base amount according to a specified percentage of the gross sales generated by the tenants and generally provide for reimbursement of real estate taxes and expenses of operating the property. Economic and/or competitive conditions may impact the success of our tenants’ retail operations and therefore the amount of rent and expense reimbursements we receive from our tenants. While demand for our retail spaces has been strong, there can be no assurance in our ability to maintain our occupancy levels on favorable terms. Any reduction in our tenants’ abilities to pay base rent, percentage rent or other charges on a timely basis will decrease our income, funds available to pay indebtedness and funds available for distribution to shareholders. If a tenant does not pay its rent, we might not be able to enforce our rights as landlord without delays and might incur substantial legal and other costs. During periods of economic adversity, there may be an increase in the number of tenants that cannot pay their rent and an increase in vacancy rates, which could materially and adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be unable to renew leases or relet space as leases expire.expire on terms comparable to prior leases or at all.
When our tenants decide not to renew their leases upon their expiration, we may not be able to relet the space.space on terms comparable to prior leases or at all. Spaces that accounted for approximately 8%15.2% of physical occupancy were vacant as of December 31, 2021, excluding leases signed but not commenced. In addition, leases accounting for approximately 28% of our annualized base rent for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 were vacant as of December 31, 2019, excluding leases signed but not commenced. In addition, leases accounting for approximately 22% of our annualized base rent for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20192021 are scheduled to expire within the next three years. Even if tenants do renew or we can relet the space, the terms of the renewal or reletting, taking into account among other things, the cost of improvements to the property and leasing commissions, may be less favorable than the terms in the expired leases. In addition, changes in space utilization by our tenants may impact our ability to renew or relet space without the need to incur substantial costs in renovating or redesigning the internal configuration of the relevant property. If we are unable to promptly renew the leases or relet the space at similar rates or if we incur substantial costs in renewing or reletting the space, our cash flow and ability to service debt obligations and pay dividends and other distributions to security holders could be adversely affected.

Bankruptcy or insolvency of tenants may decrease our revenues, net income and available cash.
From time to time, somecertain of our tenants have become insolvent or declared bankruptcy and other tenants may declare bankruptcy or become insolvent in the future. For example, during the year ended December 31, 2018, Toys “R” Us Inc. (“Toys “R” Us”), Sears Holding Corporation (“Sears”), National Stores Inc. (“Fallas”) and National Wholesale Liquidators filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources included in Part II, Item 7. in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8. in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Tenants who file for bankruptcy protection have the legal right to reject any or all of their leases and close related stores. In the event that a tenant with a significant number of leases in our properties files for bankruptcy and rejects its leases, we could experience a significant reduction in our revenues and we may not be able to collect all pre-petition amounts owed by that party, which may adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. The bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant at one of our properties could also negatively impact our ability to lease other existing or future vacancies at any such property. In addition, our leases generally do not contain restrictions designed to ensure the ongoing creditworthiness of our tenants. The bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant could result in a
6


lower level of net income, which may adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations and decrease funds available to pay our indebtedness or make distributions to shareholders.
See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources included in Part I,II, Item 2. “Properties”7 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.





A significant number of our properties are located in the New York metropolitan area and are affected by the economic cycles there.
Because a significant number of our properties are located in the New York metropolitan area, we are particularly susceptible to adverse economic and other developments in that area. Notably, as of December 31, 2019,2021, one of our New York metropolitan area properties, The Outlets at Bergen Town Center, in Paramus, NJ, generated in excess of 10% of our rental revenue.annualized base rent. Collectively, our New York metropolitan area properties in the aggregate generated 75%approximately 74% of our rental revenueannualized base rent as of December 31, 2019.2021. Real estate markets are subject to economic downturns and we cannot predict the economic conditions in the New York metropolitan area in either the short-term or long-term. Poor economic or market conditions in the New York metropolitan area, may adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks related to Puerto Rico.
Our two malls in Puerto Rico make up approximately 8% of our Net Operating Income. Puerto Rico faces significant fiscal and economic challenges, including its government filing for bankruptcy protection in 2017. In addition, Hurricanes Irma and Maria placed significant, lasting stress on the island’s already strained economy and infrastructure, exacerbated by recent earthquakes. These factors have led to an ongoing emigration trend of Puerto Rico residents to the United States and elsewhere. The combination of these circumstances could result in less disposable income for the purchase of goods sold in our malls and the inability of merchants to pay rent and other charges. Any of these events could negatively impact our ability to lease space on terms and conditions we seek and could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. As of December 31, 2019, the Company has individual, non-recourse mortgages on each of its Puerto Rico properties as follows: a $113.2 million mortgage, comprised of a senior and junior loan, maturing in July 2021 secured by The Outlets at Montehiedra and a $129 million mortgage maturing in August 2024 secured by the Las Catalinas Mall.

Natural disasters could have a concentrated impact on us.
We own properties near the Atlantic Coast and in Puerto Rico which are subject to natural disasters such as hurricanes, floods and storm surges. We also have four properties in California that could be impacted by earthquakes. As a result, we could become subject to business interruption, significant losses and repair costs, such as those we experienced from Hurricane Maria, which damaged and caused the temporary closure of our two properties in Puerto Rico. The Company maintains comprehensive, all-risk property and rental value insurance coverage on our properties, however losses resulting from a natural disaster may be subject to a deductible or not fully covered and such losses could adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations.

Some of our properties depend on anchor or major tenants and decisions made by these tenants, or adverse developments in the businesses of these tenants, could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Some of our properties have anchor or major tenants that generally occupy larger spaces, sometimes pay a significant portion of a property’s total rent and often contribute to the success of other tenants by drawing customers to a property. If an anchor or major tenant closes, such closure could adversely affect the property even if the tenant continues to pay rent due to the loss of the anchor or major tenant’s drawing power. Additionally, closure of an anchor or major tenant could result in lease terminations by, or reductions in rent from, other tenants if the other tenants’ leases have co-tenancy clauses that permit cancellation or rent reduction if an anchor tenant closes. Retailer consolidation, store rationalization, competition from internet sales and general economic conditions may decrease the number of potential tenants available to fill available anchor tenant spaces. As a result, in the event one or more anchor tenants were to leave one or more of our centers, we cannot be sure that we would be able to lease the vacant space on equivalent terms or at all. In addition, we may not be able to recover costs owed to us by the closed tenant. In certain cases, some anchor and non-anchor tenants may be able to terminate their leases if they do not achieve defined sales levels.

Development and redevelopment activities have inherent risks, which could adversely impact our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations.
We may develop or redevelop properties when we believe that doing so is consistent with our business strategy. As of December 31, 2019,2021, we had 13 properties in our redevelopment project pipeline and nine21 active redevelopment projects. Weprojects in which we have invested a total of approximately $35.7$72.1 million, in our active projects, which are at various stages of completion, and based on our current plans and estimates, we anticipate it will cost an additional $29.9$146.6 million to complete our active projects.complete. We anticipate engaging in additional development and redevelopment activities in the future. In addition to the risks associated with real estate investments in general as described elsewhere, the risks associated with future development and redevelopment activities include:
expenditure of capital and time on projects that may never be completed;
failure or inability to obtain financing on favorable terms or at all;
inability to secure necessary zoning or regulatory approvals;


higher than estimated construction or operating costs, including labor and material costs;
inability to complete construction on schedule due to a number of factors, including inclement weather, labor disruptions, construction delays, restrictions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, delays or failure to receive zoning or other regulatory approvals, acts of terror or other acts of violence, or natural disasters (such as fires, seismic activity or floods);
significant time lag between commencement and stabilization resulting in delayed returns and greater risks due to fluctuations in the general economy, shifts in demographics and competition;
decrease in customer traffic during the redevelopment period causing a decrease in tenant sales;
inability to secure key anchor or other tenants at anticipated pace of lease-up or at all; and
occupancy and rental rates at a newly completed project that may not meet expectations.
7


If any of the above events were to occur, they may hinder our growth and may have an adverse effect on our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, new development and significant redevelopment activities, regardless of whether they are ultimately successful, typically require substantial time and attention from management.

We face significant competition for acquisitions of properties, which may reduce the number of acquisition opportunities available to us and increase the costs of these acquisitions.
The current market for acquisitions of properties in our core markets continues to be competitive. This competition may increase the demand for the types of properties in which we typically invest and, therefore, increase the prices paid for such acquisition properties. We also face significant competition for attractive acquisition opportunities from an indeterminate number of investors, including publicly-traded and privately-held REITs, private equity investors and institutional investment funds, some of which have greater financial resources, greater ability to borrow funds and the willingness to accept more risk than we can prudently manage, including risks with respect to the geographic proximity of investments and the payment of higher acquisition prices. This competition will increase if investments in real estate become more attractive relative to other forms of investment. Competition for investments may reduce the number of suitable investment opportunities available to us and may have the effect of increasing prices paid for such acquisition properties and, as a result, adversely affecting our ability to grow through acquisitions.

Our operating results at acquired properties may not meet our financial expectations.
Our ability to complete acquisitions on favorable terms and successfully operate or develop them is subject to the following risks:
we may incur significant costs and divert management attention in connection with the evaluation and negotiation of potential acquisitions, including ones that are subsequently not completed;
we may be unable to finance acquisitions on favorable terms and in the time period we desire, or at all;
we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate new acquisitions, particularly the acquisition of portfolios of properties, into our existing operations;
we may acquire properties that are not initially accretive to our results upon acquisition, and we may not successfully manage and lease those properties to meet our expectations; and
we may acquire properties subject to liabilities and without any recourse, or with only limited recourse to former owners, with respect to unknown liabilities for clean-up of undisclosed environmental contamination, claims by tenants or other persons to former owners of the properties and claims for indemnification by general partners, trustees, officers and others indemnified by the former owners of the properties.
If we are unable to complete acquisitions on favorable terms, or efficiently integrate such acquisitions, our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

It may be difficult to dispose of real estate quickly, which may limit our flexibility.
Real estate is relatively difficult to dispose of quickly. Consequently, we may have limited ability to promptly change our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions. Moreover, our ability to dispose of, or finance real estate may be materially and adversely affected during periods of uncertainty or unfavorable conditions in the credit markets as we or potential buyers of our real estate may experience difficulty in obtaining financing. To dispose of low basis deferral or tax-protected properties efficiently we from time to time use like-kind exchanges, which are intended to qualify for non-recognition of taxable gain, but can be difficult to consummate and result in the property for which the disposed assets are exchanged inheriting their low tax bases and other tax attributes (including tax protection covenants). These challenges related to dispositions may limit our flexibility.




Many real estate costs are fixed, even if income from our properties decreases.
Our financial results depend primarily on leasing space in our properties to tenants on terms favorable to us. Costs associated with operating real estate, such as real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance costs, generally are not reduced even when a property is not fully occupied, rental rates decrease, or other circumstances cause a reduction in income from the property. As a result, cash flow from operations may be reduced if a tenant does not pay its rent or we are unable to rent our properties on favorable terms.


8


A number of properties in our portfolio are subject to ground or building leases; if we are found to be in breach of a ground or building lease or are unable to renew a ground or building lease, we could be materially and adversely affected.
A number of the properties in our portfolio are either completely or partially on land that is owned by third parties and leased to us pursuant to ground or building leases. Accordingly, we only own a long-term leasehold or similar interest in those properties. If we are found to be in breach of a ground or building lease and that breach cannot be cured, we could lose our interest in the improvements and the right to operate the property. In addition, unless we can purchase a fee interest in the underlying land or building or extend the terms of these leases before or at their expiration, as to which no assurance can be given, we will lose our interest in the improvements and the right to operate these properties. However, in certain cases, our ability to exercise such options is subject to the condition that we are not in default under the terms of the ground or building lease at the time that we exercise such options, and we can provide no assurances that we will be able to exercise our options at such time. If we were to lose the right to operate a property due to a breach or non-renewal of the ground or building lease, we would be unable to derive income from such property, which could materially and adversely affect us.

LossOur assets may be subject to impairment charges.
Real estate is carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Our properties are individually reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the property may not be recoverable. An impairment exists when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the aggregate projected future cash flows over the anticipated holding period on an undiscounted basis, taking into account the appropriate capitalization rate in determining a future terminal value. An impairment loss is based on the excess of the property’s carrying amount over its estimated fair value. Recording an impairment charge results in an immediate reduction in our income in the period in which the charge is taken, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR LIQUIDITY AND INDEBTEDNESS

Risks related to our outstanding debt.
We have historically used moderate levels of leverage and expect to continue to incur indebtedness to support our activities. As of December 31, 2021, our outstanding indebtedness was $1.7 billion, of which $161.1 million was variable rate indebtedness. If we are unable to obtain debt financing or refinance existing debt upon maturity on terms favorable to us or at all, our financial condition and results of operations would likely be adversely affected.
As of December 31, 2021, approximately 9.5% of our key personnelcurrent outstanding debt bore interest at variable rates which bears interest at a floating rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), plus an applicable margin. We are exposed to risks related to a potential rising interest rate environment for our current or any future variable interest rate debt. Interest expense on our variable rate debt at December 31, 2021 would increase by approximately $1.6 million annually for every 100-basis-point increase in interest rates. While we may enter into interest rate hedging transactions with counterparties, there can be no guarantee that the future financial condition of these counterparties will enable them to fulfill their obligations under such agreements.
In 2017, U.K. regulators announced that they intend to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. As a result, U.S. regulators identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as their preferred alternative to USD LIBOR in derivatives and other financial contracts. Additionally, while U.S. official guidance states that there should be no new LIBOR trading after December 31, 2021, USD LIBOR will continue to be published until June 2023 and we are not currently able to predict when LIBOR will cease to be available in the United States. When LIBOR is discontinued, the interest rates of our LIBOR-indexed debt following such event will be based on either alternate base rates, such as SOFR, or agreed upon replacement rates. While such an event would not affect our ability to borrow or maintain already outstanding borrowings, it could result in higher interest rates.
If the cost or amount of our debt increases or we cannot refinance our debt in sufficient amounts or on acceptable terms, we are at risk of default on our obligations, which could have a material adverse effect on our company, including our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.

Covenants in our existing financing agreements may restrict our operating, financing, redevelopment, development, acquisition and other activities.
The mortgages on our properties contain customary covenants such as those that limit our ability, without the prior consent of the lender, to further mortgage the applicable property or to reduce insurance coverage. Our existing revolving credit facility contains, and any debt that we may obtain in the future may contain, customary restrictions, requirements and other limitations on our ability to incur indebtedness, including covenants (i) that limit our ability to incur debt based upon (1) our ratio of total debt to total assets, (2) our ratio of secured debt to total assets, (3) our ratio of earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and
9


amortization (EBITDA) to interest expense and (4) our ratio of EBITDA to fixed charges, and (ii) that require us to maintain a certain level of unencumbered assets to unsecured debt. Our ability to borrow is subject to compliance with these and other covenants. Failure to comply with our covenants could cause a default under the applicable debt instrument and we may then be required to repay such debt with capital from other sources or to give possession of a secured property to the lender. Under those circumstances, other sources of capital may not be available to us or may be available only on unattractive terms.

Defaults on secured indebtedness may result in foreclosure.
In the event that we default on mortgages in the future, either as a result of ceasing to make debt service payments or failing to meet applicable covenants, the lenders may accelerate the related debt obligations and foreclose and/or take control of the properties that secure their loans. As of December 31, 2021, we had $1.7 billion of secured debt outstanding and 33 of our properties were encumbered by secured debt. As of December 31, 2021, we were in compliance with all debt covenants. Further, for tax purposes, the foreclosure of a mortgage may result in the recognition of taxable income related to the extinguished debt without us having received any accompanying cash proceeds. As a result, since we are structured as a REIT, we may be required to identify and utilize sources for distributions to our shareholders related to such taxable income in order to avoid incurring corporate tax or to meet the REIT distribution requirements imposed by the Code.

We may not be able to obtain capital to make investments.
We depend primarily on external financing to fund the growth of our business because one of the requirements of the Code for a REIT is that it distributes at least 90% of its taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to its shareholders. There is a separate requirement to distribute net capital gains or pay a corporate level tax in lieu thereof. Our access to debt or equity financing depends on the willingness of third parties to lend to or to make equity investments and on conditions in the capital markets generally. There can be no assurance that new financing or other capital will be available or available on acceptable terms. The failure to obtain financing or other capital could materially and adversely affect the value of our business, results of operations and financial condition. For information about our available sources of funds, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources included in Part II, Item 7. in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8. in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

RISKS RELATED TO BUSINESS CONTINUITY

Risks related to our malls in Puerto Rico.
Our two malls in Puerto Rico make up approximately 8% of our net operating income for the year ended December 31, 2021. Puerto Rico faces significant fiscal and economic challenges, including those resulting from natural disasters such as hurricanes and earthquakes, the COVID-19 pandemic, and its government filing for bankruptcy protection in 2017. These factors have led to an ongoing emigration trend of Puerto Rico residents to the United States and elsewhere. The combination of these circumstances could result in less disposable income for the purchase of goods sold in our malls and the inability of merchants to pay rent and other charges. Any of these events could negatively impact our ability to lease space on terms and conditions we seek and could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. As of December 31, 2021, we have individual, non-recourse mortgages on each of our Puerto Rico properties.

Natural disasters could have a concentrated impact on us.
We own properties near the Atlantic Coast and in Puerto Rico which are dependentsubject to natural disasters such as hurricanes, floods and storm surges. We also have four properties in California that could be impacted by earthquakes. As a result, we could become subject to business interruption, significant losses and repair costs, such as those we experienced from Hurricane Maria, which damaged and caused the temporary closure of our two properties in Puerto Rico. We maintain comprehensive, all-risk property and rental value insurance coverage on our key executive personnel. Although we believe qualified replacementsproperties, however losses resulting from a natural disaster may be subject to a deductible or not fully covered and such losses could adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations.

Some of our potential losses may not be covered by insurance.
We maintain numerous insurance policies including for general liability, property, pollution, acts of terrorism, trustees’ and officers’, cyber security, workers’ compensation and automobile-related liabilities. However, all such policies are subject to the terms, conditions, exclusions, deductibles and sub-limits, among other limiting factors.For example, our terrorism insurance policy excludes coverage for nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological terrorism events as defined by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act.
10


Certain of the insurance premiums are charged directly to each of the properties but not all of the cost of such premiums are recovered. We are responsible for deductibles, losses in excess of insurance coverage, and the portion of premiums not reimbursable by tenants at our properties, which could be found for these key executivesmaterial.
We continue to monitor the state of the insurance market and the scope and costs of available coverage. We cannot anticipate what coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in the future and expect premiums across most coverage lines to increase in light of recent events. The incurrence of uninsured losses, costs or uncovered premiums could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources included in Part II, Item 7. in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8. in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Terrorist acts and shooting incidents could harm the demand for, and the value of, our properties.
Over the past several years, a number of highly publicized terrorist acts and shootings have occurred at domestic and international retail properties. In the event concerns regarding safety were to alter shopping habits or deter customers from visiting shopping centers, our tenants would be adversely affected as would the general demand for retail space. Additionally, if such incidents were to continue, insurance for such acts may become limited or subject to substantial cost increases. Such an incident at one of our properties, particularly one in which we generate a departure, the losssignificant amount of one or more of their services, market knowledge and business relationships,revenue, could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our business and operations would suffer in the event of system failures.
Despite system redundancy, the implementation of security measures and the existence of a disaster recovery plan for our information technology (“IT”) infrastructure, our systems are vulnerable to damages from any number of sources, including computer viruses, unauthorized access, energy blackouts, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication failures. We have placed reliance on third party managed services to perform a number of IT-related functions. We implemented a new information technology platform in August 2017, including a new enterprise resources planning (“ERP”) system. Wefunctions and we may experience system difficulties related to our new platform and integrating the services provided by third parties. If we experience a system failure or accident that causes interruptions in our operations, we could experience material and adverse disruptions to our business. We may also incur additional costs to remedy damages caused by such disruptions.

We face risks associated with security and cyber security breaches.
We face risks associated with security breaches, whether through cyber attacks or cyber intrusions over the internet, malware, computer viruses, attachments to emails, persons inside our organization or persons with access to systems, and other significant disruptions of our IT networks and related systems. Similarly, vendors from whom we receive outsourced IT-related services, including third-party platforms, face the same risks, which could in turn affect us. Our internal and outsourced IT networks and related systems are essential to the operation of our business and our ability to perform day to day operations. Although (i) we make efforts to maintain the security and integrity of our IT networks and related systems and ensure that our vendors do and (ii) we have implemented various measures to manage the risk of a security breach or disruption, there can be no assurance that our security efforts and measures will be effective or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. Even the most well protected information, networks, systems and facilities remain potentially vulnerable because the techniques used in such attempted security breaches evolve and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, and in some cases are designed not to be detected and, in fact, may not be detected. Accordingly, we or our vendors may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate security barriers or other preventative measures, and thus it is impossible for us to entirely mitigate this risk.
A breach or significant and extended disruption in the functioning of our systems, including our primary website, may damage our reputation and cause us to lose customers, tenants and revenues, generate third-party claims, result in the unintended and/or unauthorized public disclosure or the misappropriation of proprietary, personal identifying and confidential information, and require us to incur significant expenses to address and remediate or otherwise resolve these kinds of issues, and we may not be able to recover these expenses in whole or in any part from our service providers, responsible parties, or insurance carriers which could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.


RISKS RELATED TO ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE

We may be adversely affected by laws, regulations or other issues related to climate change.
We may become subject to laws or regulations related to climate change, which could cause our business, results of operations and financial condition to be impacted adversely. The federal government has enacted, and some of the states and localities in which we operate may enact, certain climate change laws and regulations or have begun regulating carbon footprints and greenhouse gas emissions. Although these laws and regulations have not had any known material adverse effects on our business to date, they could result in substantial costs, including compliance costs, increased energy costs, retrofit costs and construction costs, including monitoring and reporting costs, and capital expenditures for environmental control facilities and other new equipment. We have implemented strategies to support our continued effort to reduce energy and water consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and waste production across our portfolio. We cannot predict how future laws and regulations, or future interpretations of current laws and regulations, related to climate change will affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, the potential physical impacts of climate change on our operations are highly uncertain,
11


and would be particular to the geographic circumstances in areas in which we operate. These may include changes to global weather patterns, which could include local changes in rainfall and storm patterns and intensities, water shortages, changing sea levels and changing temperature averages or extremes. These impacts may adversely affect our properties, our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may incur significant costs to comply with environmental laws and environmental contamination may impair our ability to lease and/or sell real estate.
Our operations and properties are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations concerning the protection of the environment including air and water quality, hazardous or toxic substances and health and safety. These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. The cost of any required remediation may exceed the value of the property and/or the aggregate assets of the owner or the responsible party. The presence of, or the failure to properly remediate, hazardous or toxic substances may adversely affect our ability to sell or lease a contaminated property or to use the property as collateral for a loan. We can provide no assurance that we are aware of all potential environmental liabilities; that any previous owner, occupant or tenant did not create any material environmental condition not known to us; that our properties will not be affected by tenants or nearby properties or other unrelated third parties; and that future uses or conditions, or changes in environmental laws and regulations will not result in additional material environmental liabilities to us.  For example, during the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company recognized $1.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of environmental remediation costs at certain properties based on third-party estimates of the potential costs of remediation at these properties.
Generally, our tenants must comply with environmental laws and meet remediation requirements. Our leases typically impose obligations on our tenants to indemnify us from any compliance costs we may incur as a result of the environmental conditions on the property caused by the tenant. If a lease does not require compliance or if a tenant fails to or cannot comply, we could be forced to pay these costs.

If not addressed, environmental conditions could impair our ability to sell or re-lease the affected properties in the future or result in lower sales prices or rent payments, which could adversely impact our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations.

SomeIncreased scrutiny and changing expectations from investors, customers, employees, and others regarding our environmental, social and governance practices and reporting could cause us to incur additional costs, devote additional resources and expose us to additional risks, which could adversely impact our reputation, customer acquisition and retention, access to capital and employee retention.
Companies across all industries are facing increasing scrutiny related to their ESG practices and reporting. Investors, customers, employees, and other stakeholders have begun to focus increasingly on ESG practices and to place increasing importance on the implications and social cost of their investments, purchases, and other interactions with companies. With this increased focus and demand, public reporting regarding ESG practices is becoming more broadly expected. If our potential lossesESG practices and reporting do not meet investor, customer, or employee expectations, which continue to evolve, our reputation and tenant retention may be negatively impacted. Any disclosure we make may include our policies and practices on a variety of ESG matters, including corporate governance, environmental compliance, employee health and safety practices, human capital management, and workforce inclusion and diversity. It is possible that stakeholders may not be covered by insurance.
The Company maintains (i) general liability insurancesatisfied with limitsour ESG reporting, our ESG practices or our speed of $200 million for properties in the U.S.adoption. We could also incur additional costs and Puerto Rico and (ii) all-risk property insurance with limits of $500 million per occurrence and in the aggregate for properties in the U.S. and $139 million for properties in Puerto Rico, subject to the terms, conditions, exclusions, deductibles and sub-limits when applicable for certain perils such as floods and earthquakes and (iii) numerous other insurance policies including trustees’ and officers’ insurance, workers’ compensation and automobile-related liabilities insurance. The Company’s insurance includes coverage for acts of terrorism but excludes coverage for nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological terrorism events as defined by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act, which expires in December 2020. In addition, the Company maintains coverage for certain cybersecurity losses providing first and third-party coverage including network interruption, event management, cyber extortion and claims for media content, security and privacy liability. Insurance premiums are typically charged directly to each of the retail properties and warehouses but not all of the cost of such premiums are recovered. The Company is responsible for deductibles, losses in excess of insurance coverage, and the portion of premiums not reimbursable by tenants at our properties, which could be material.
We continuedevote additional resources to monitor, report and implement various ESG practices. If we fail, or are perceived to be failing, to meet the state ofstandards included in any sustainability disclosure or the insurance market and the scope and costs of available coverage. We cannot anticipate what coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in the future and expect premiums across most coverage lines to increase in light of recent events. The incurrence of uninsured losses, costs or uncovered premiums could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Certainexpectations of our loansvarious stakeholders, it could negatively impact our reputation, tenant and other agreements contain customary covenants requiring the maintenance of insurance coverage. Although we believe that we currently have adequate insurance coverage for purposes of these agreements, we may not be ableemployee retention, and access to obtain an equivalent amount of coverage at reasonable costs in the future. If lenders or other counterparties insist on greater coverage than we are able to obtain, such requirement could materially and adversely affect our ability to finance our properties and expand our portfolio.capital.

Future terrorist acts and shooting incidents could harm the demand for, and the value of, our properties.
Over the past several years, a number of highly publicized terrorist acts and shootings have occurred at domestic and international retail properties. In the event concerns regarding safety were to alter shopping habits or deter customers from visiting shopping centers, our tenants would be adversely affected as would the general demand for retail space. Additionally, if such incidents were to continue, insurance for such acts may become limited or subject to substantial cost increases. Such an incident at one of our properties, particularly one in which we generate a significant amount of revenue, could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.





Our assets may be subject to impairment charges.
Real estate is carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Our properties are individually reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the property may not be recoverable. An impairment exists when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the aggregate projected future cash flows over the anticipated holding period on an undiscounted basis. An impairment loss is measured by the excess of the property’s carrying amount over its estimated fair value. Recording an impairment charge results in an immediate reduction in our income in the period in which the charge is taken, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Compliance or failure to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, safety regulations or other requirements could result in substantial costs.
The ADA generally requires that public buildings including our properties meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Noncompliance could result in the imposition of fines by the federal government or the award of damages to private litigants and/or legal fees to their counsel. We could be required under the ADA to make substantial alterations to, and capital expenditures at, one or more of our properties, including the removal of access barriers, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our properties are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements such as state and local fire and life safety regulations. If we fail to comply with these requirements, we could incur fines or private damage awards. We do not know whether existing requirements will change or whether compliance with future requirements will require significant unanticipated expenditures. If we incur substantial costs to comply with the ADA and any other legislation, our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Changes in accounting principles, or interpretations thereof, could have a significant impact on our financial position and results of operations.
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). These principles are subject to interpretation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and various bodies formed to interpret and create appropriate accounting principles. A change in these principles can have a significant effect on our reported results and may even retroactively affect previously reported transactions. Additionally, the adoption of new or revised accounting principles may require that we make significant changes to our systems, processes and controls.
For example, in February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, Leases, which requires lessees to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months, regardless of classification. Implementing ASUs, as well as other new accounting guidance may require us to make significant upgrades to and investments in our ERP systems, and could result in significant adverse changes to our financial statements. For additional information regarding updated standards, see the section titled “Recently Issued Accounting Literature” in Note 3 to the audited consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
12


We face possible adverse changes in tax law.RISKS RELATED TO OUR STATUS AS A REIT
Changes in U.S. federal, state and local tax laws or regulations, with or without retroactive application, could have a negative effect on us. New legislation, Treasury regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantly and negatively affect our ability to qualify to be taxed as a REIT and/or the U.S. federal income tax consequences to our investors and to the Company of such qualification. Any changes to the Code and Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder that apply to determine the taxability of our separation from Vornado have been the subject of change and may continue to be the subject of change, possibly with retroactive application, which could have a negative effect on our shareholders and could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition, and the amount of cash available for payment of dividends. Even changes that do not impose greater taxes on us could potentially result in adverse consequences to our shareholders.
In December 2019, the IRS issued proposed Treasury regulations related to Section 162(m) of the Code that extend the $1 million deduction limit that publicly traded corporations may take for compensation paid to “covered employees” to a REIT’s distributive share of any compensation paid by the REIT’s operating partnership to certain current and former executive officers of the REIT. This change may limit our ability to deduct certain compensation that would have been deductible under prior law.

Our existing tax protection agreements, and any tax protection agreements that we enter into in the future, could limit our flexibility with respect to disposing of certain of properties or refinancing our indebtedness.
In connection with certain contributions of properties to UELP, we and UELP have entered into tax protection agreements with the contributors of such properties that generally provide that if we dispose of any interest in the contributed properties in a taxable transaction within a certain time period, subject to certain exceptions, we may be required to indemnify the contributors for their tax liabilities attributable to the built-in gain that existed with respect to such property interests, and certain tax liabilities incurred


as a result of such tax protection payments. Therefore, although it may be in our stockholders’ best interests that we sell a contributed property, it may be economically prohibitive for us to do so because of these obligations. In the future, we and UELP may enter into additional tax protection agreements which could further limit our flexibility to sell or otherwise dispose of our properties.

In addition, one of our current tax protection agreements requires, and any tax protection agreements we enter into in the future may require, UELP to maintain for specified periods of time secured debt on certain of our assets and/or allocate partnership debt to certain contributors of properties to enable them to continue to defer recognition of their taxable gain with respect to the contributed properties. If the failure of UELP to maintain such levels of debt causes any such contributor to recognize gain, we may be required to deliver to such contributor a cash payment intended to approximate the contributor’s tax liability resulting from such failure and certain tax liabilities incurred as a result of such tax protection payment. This tax protection agreement may restrict UELP’s ability to repay or refinance debt or require UELP to maintain more or different debt than UELP would otherwise require for our business.

Covenants in our existing financing agreements may restrict our operating, financing, redevelopment, development, acquisition and other activities.
The mortgages on our properties contain customary covenants such as those that limit our ability, without the prior consent of the lender, to further mortgage the applicable property or to reduce insurance coverage. Our existing revolving credit facility contains, and any debt that we may obtain in the future may contain, customary restrictions, requirements and other limitations on our ability to incur indebtedness, including covenants (i) that limit our ability to incur debt based upon (1) our ratio of total debt to total assets, (2) our ratio of secured debt to total assets, (3) our ratio of earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) to interest expense and (4) our ratio of EBITDA to fixed charges, and (ii) that require us to maintain a certain level of unencumbered assets to unsecured debt. Our ability to borrow is subject to compliance with these and other covenants. Failure to comply with our covenants could cause a default under the applicable debt instrument and we may then be required to repay such debt with capital from other sources or to give possession of a secured property to the lender. Under those circumstances, other sources of capital may not be available to us or may be available only on unattractive terms.

Risks related to our outstanding debt.
If we are unable to obtain debt financing or refinance existing indebtedness upon maturity on terms favorable to us, our financial condition and results of operations would likely be adversely affected. In addition, the cost of our existing variable rate debt may increase, especially in a rising interest rate environment, and we may not be able to refinance our existing debt in sufficient amounts or on acceptable terms. As of December 31, 2019, we had $169.5 million of variable rate debt and our $600 million revolving credit facility, on which no balance is outstanding at December 31, 2019, bears interest at a floating rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus an applicable margin, and we may continue to borrow additional funds at variable interest rates in the future. In the event that LIBOR is discontinued, the interest rates of our debt following such event will be based on either alternate base rates or agreed upon replacement rates. Such an event would not affect our ability to borrow or maintain already outstanding borrowings, although it could result in higher interest rates. Increases in interest rates would increase the interest expense on our variable rate debt and reduce our cash flow, which could (i) adversely affect our ability to service our debt and meet our other obligations and (ii) reduce the amount we are able to distribute to our shareholders. If the cost or amount of our indebtedness increases or we cannot refinance our debt in sufficient amounts or on acceptable terms, we are at risk of default on our obligations, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

Defaults on secured indebtedness may result in foreclosure.
In the event that we default on mortgages in the future, either as a result of ceasing to make debt service payments or failing to meet applicable covenants, the lenders may accelerate the related debt obligations and foreclose and/or take control of the properties that secure their loans. As of December 31, 2019, we had $1.6 billion of secured debt outstanding and 31 of our properties were encumbered by secured debt. Further, for tax purposes, the foreclosure of a mortgage may result in the recognition of taxable income related to the extinguished debt without us having received any accompanying cash proceeds. As a result, since we are structured as a REIT, we may be required to identify and utilize sources for distributions to our shareholders related to such taxable income in order to avoid incurring corporate tax or to meet the REIT distribution requirements imposed by the Code.

We may not be able to obtain capital to make investments.
We depend primarily on external financing to fund the growth of our business because one of the requirements of the Code for a REIT is that it distributes at least 90% of its taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to its shareholders. There is a separate requirement to distribute net capital gains or pay a corporate level tax in lieu thereof. Our access to debt or equity financing depends on the willingness of third parties to lend to or to make equity investments and on conditions in the capital markets generally. There can be no assurance that new financing or other capital will be available or available on acceptable terms. The failure to obtain financing or other capital could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.


For information about our available sources of funds, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources included in Part II, Item 7. in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8. in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We may fail to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT and may be required to pay income taxes at corporate rates.
Although we believe that we will remain organized and will continue to operate so as to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we may fail to remain so qualified. Qualifications are governed by highly technical and complex provisions of the Code for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations and that depend on various facts and circumstances that are not entirely within our control. In addition, legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions may significantly change the relevant tax laws and/or the federal income tax consequences of qualifying as a REIT. If, with respect to any taxable year, we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT and do not qualify under statutory relief provisions, we could not deduct distributions to shareholders in computing our taxable income and would have to pay federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. The federal income tax payable would include any applicable alternative minimum tax (which, for corporations, was repealed for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 under the TCJA). If we had to pay federal income tax, the amount of money available to distribute to shareholders and pay our indebtedness would be reduced for the year or years involved, and we would no longer be required to make distributions to shareholders. In addition, we would also be disqualified as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost unless we were entitled to relief under the relevant statutory provisions.
We are also required to pay certain corporate-level taxes on our assets located in Puerto Rico and such taxes may increase if recently proposed taxes are implemented.

REIT distribution requirements could adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to execute our business plan.
To qualify to be taxed as a REIT, and assuming that certain other requirements are also satisfied, we generally must distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains, to our shareholders each year so that U.S. federal corporate income tax does not apply to earnings that we distribute. To the extent that we satisfy this distribution requirement and qualify for taxation as a REIT, but distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and including any net capital gains, we will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our undistributed net taxable income. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax if the actual amount that we distribute to our shareholders in a calendar year is less than a minimum amount specified under U.S. federal income tax laws. We intend to distribute 100% of our REIT taxable income to our shareholders.
From time to time, we may generate taxable income greater than our cash flow as a result of differences in timing between the recognition of taxable income and the actual receipt of cash or the effect of nondeductible capital expenditures, the effect of limitations on interest and net operating loss deductibility under the TCJA, the creation of reserves, or required debt or amortization payments. If we do not have other funds available in these situations, we could be required to borrow funds on unfavorable terms, sell assets at disadvantageous prices, distribute amounts that would otherwise be invested in future acquisitions, capital expenditures or repayment of debt, or make taxable distributions of our shares or debt securities to make distributions sufficient to enable us to pay out enough of our taxable income to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement and avoid corporate income tax and the 4% excise tax in a particular year. These alternatives could increase our costs or reduce our equity. Further, amounts distributed will not be available to fund investment activities. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to grow, which could adversely affect the value of our shares. Any restrictions on our ability to incur additional indebtedness or make certain distributions could preclude us from meeting the 90% distribution requirement. Decreases in funds from operations due to unfinanced expenditures for acquisitions of properties or increases in the number of shares outstanding without commensurate increases in funds from operations would adversely affect our ability to maintain distributions to our shareholders. Consequently, there can be no assurance that we will be able to make distributions at the anticipated distribution rate or any other rate.

Risks related to Section 1031 Exchanges.
From time to time we may dispose of properties in transactions that are intended to qualify as “like kind exchanges” under Section 1031 of the Code (“Section 1031 Exchanges”). It is possible that the qualification of a transaction as a Section 1031 Exchange could be successfully challenged and determined to be currently taxable. In such case, our taxable income and earnings and profits would increase. In some circumstances, we may be required to pay additional dividends or, in lieu of that, corporate income tax, possibly including interest and penalties. As a result, we may be required to borrow funds in order to pay additional dividends or taxes, and the payment of such taxes could cause us to have less cash available to distribute to our shareholders. In addition, if a Section 1031 Exchange were later to be determined to be taxable, we may be required to amend our tax returns for the applicable year in question, including any information reports we sent our shareholders. Moreover, it is possible that legislation could be enacted that could modify or repeal the laws with respect to Section 1031 Exchanges, which could make it more difficult or not possible for us to dispose of properties on a tax deferred basis.

13



We face possible adverse changes in tax law.
RiskChanges in U.S. federal, state and local tax laws or regulations, with or without retroactive application, could have a negative effect on us. New legislation, Treasury regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantly and negatively affect our ability to qualify to be taxed as a REIT and/or the U.S. federal income tax consequences to our investors and to us of such qualification. Even changes that do not impose greater taxes on us could potentially result in adverse consequences to our shareholders.
In 2019, the IRS issued proposed Treasury regulations related to Section 162(m) of the termsCode that extend the $1 million deduction limit that publicly traded corporations may take for compensation paid to “covered employees” to a REIT’s distributive share of any compensation paid by the REIT’s operating partnership to certain current and former executive officers of the REIT. This change may limit our agreements relatedability to our separation from Vornado.
In connection with our separation from Vornado, we entered intodeduct certain agreements with Vornado, including a separation agreement (the “Separation Agreement”) and a tax matters agreement (the “Tax Matters Agreement”, together with the Separation Agreement, the “Agreements”), which govern certain aspects of our relationship with Vornado. For example, the Tax Matters Agreement governs Vornado’s and UE’s respective rights, responsibilities and obligations with respect to taxes and liabilities and certain other tax matters. Pursuant to the agreement, UE may be required to indemnify Vornado in certain circumstances. The Separation Agreement also contains indemnification provisions which may make us financially responsible for substantially all liabilities that may exist relating to our business activities, whether incurred prior to or after the separation and distribution, as well as additional obligations of Vornado that we assumed pursuant to the Separation Agreement.
The terms of our Agreements, including those relating to tax and indemnification, were determined while we were still a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vornado. They were determined by persons who were, at the time, employees, officers or trustees of Vornado or its subsidiaries and, as a result, the terms of those agreements may not reflect termscompensation that would have resulted from arm’s-length negotiations between unaffiliated third parties. Arm’s-length negotiations between Vornado and an unaffiliated third party in another form of transaction, such as a buyer in a sale of a business transaction, may have resulted in more favorable terms to the unaffiliated third party. See “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions.”been deductible under prior law.

There is no assurance that Vornado can satisfy its indemnification obligations to us or that such indemnification can fully offset the related liabilities.
Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, Vornado has agreed to retain and indemnify us for certain liabilities. However, third parties could seek to hold us responsible for any of such liabilities and there can be no assurance that Vornado will fully satisfy its indemnification obligations. Even if we ultimately succeed in recovering from Vornado any amounts for which we are held liable, such indemnification may be insufficient to fully offset the financial impact of such liabilities and we may be temporarily required to bear these losses while seeking recovery from Vornado.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR ORGANIZATION AND STRUCTURE

Our Declaration of Trust sets limits on the ownership of our shares.
Generally, for us to maintain a qualification as a REIT under the Code, not more than fifty percent (50%) in value of our outstanding shares of beneficial interest may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals at any time during the last half of our taxable year. The Code defines “individuals” for purposes of the requirement described in the preceding sentence to include some types of entities. Under our Declaration of Trust, no person or entity (or group thereof) may own more than 9.8% (in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of our outstanding shares of any class or series, with some exceptions for persons or entities approved by the Board of Trustees. A transfer of our shares of beneficial interest to a person who, as a result of the transfer, violates the ownership limit will be void under certain circumstances, and, in any event, would deny that person any of the economic benefits of owning shares in excess of the ownership limit. These restrictions on transferability and ownership may delay, deter or prevent a change in control of us or other transaction that might involve a premium price or otherwise be in the best interest of the shareholders.

Our Declaration of Trust limits the removal of members of the Board of Trustees.
Our Declaration of Trust provides that, subject to the rights of holders of one or more classes or series of preferred shares to elect or remove one or more trustees, a trustee may be removed only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast in the election of trustees. This provision, when coupled with the exclusive power of the Board of Trustees to fill vacancies on the Board of Trustees, precludes shareholders from removing incumbent trustees except for cause and upon a substantial affirmative vote and filling the vacancies created by the removal with their own nominees. These limitations may delay, deter or prevent a change in control of us or other transactions that might involve a premium price or otherwise be in the best interest of our shareholders.

Maryland law contains provisions that may reduce the likelihood of certain takeover transactions.
Certain provisions of Maryland law, may have the effect of inhibiting a third-party from making a proposal to acquire us or of impeding a change in control under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of our shares, including:
“Business combination” provisions that, subject to certain exceptions, prohibit certain business combinations between us and an “interested shareholder” (defined generally as any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of our shares or an affiliate thereof or an affiliate or associate of ours who was the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 10% or more of the voting power of our then outstanding voting shares at any time within the two-year period immediately prior to the date in question) for five years after the most recent date on which the shareholder becomes an interested shareholder, and thereafter impose fair price or super majority shareholder voting requirements on these combinations; and
“Control share” provisions that provide the holders of “control shares” of a company (defined as shares that, when aggregated with other shares controlled by the shareholder, entitle the shareholder to exercise voting power in the election of trustees within one of three increasing ranges) acquired in a “control share acquisition” (defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of ownership or control of the voting power of issued and outstanding “control shares,” subject to certain exceptions) have no voting rights with respect to their control shares, except to the extent approved by our shareholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding all interested shares.
As permitted by Maryland law, our Bylaws provide that we will not be subject to the control share provisions of Maryland law. However, we cannot assure you that the Board of Trustees will not revise our Bylaws in order to be subject to such control share provisions in the future.
14


Certain provisions of Maryland law permit the board of trustees of a Maryland real estate investment trust with at least three independent trustees and a class of shares registered under the Exchange Act, without shareholder approval and regardless of what is currently provided in its declaration of trust or bylaws, to implement certain corporate governance provisions, some of which (for example, implementing a classified board) are not currently applicable to us. These provisions may have the effect of limiting or precluding a third party from making an unsolicited acquisition proposal for us or of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of shares of our shares with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then current market price.

We may issue additional shares in a manner that could adversely affect the likelihood of certain takeover transactions.
Our Declaration of Trust and Bylaws authorize the Board of Trustees in its sole discretion and without shareholder approval, to:
cause us to issue additional authorized, but unissued, common or preferred shares;
classify or reclassify, in one or more classes or series, any unissued common or preferred shares;
set the preferences, rights and other terms of any classified or reclassified shares that we issue; and
increase the number of shares of beneficial interest that we may issue.
The Board of Trustees can establish a class or series of common or preferred shares whose terms could delay, deter or prevent a change in control of us or other transaction that might involve a premium price or otherwise be in the best interest of our shareholders. Our Declaration of Trust and Bylaws contain other provisions that may delay, deter or prevent a change in control of us or other transaction that might involve a premium price or otherwise be in our best interest or the best interest of our shareholders.

RISKS RELATED TO AN INVESTMENT IN OUR COMMON SHARES

The market prices and trading volume of our equity securities may be volatile.
The market prices of our equity securities depend on various factors which may be unrelated to our operating performance or prospects. We cannot assure you that the market prices of our equity securities, including our common shares, will not fluctuate or decline significantly in the future.
A number of factors could negatively affect, or result in fluctuations in, the prices or trading volume of equity securities, including:
actual or anticipated changes in our operating results and changes in expectations of future financial performance;
our operating performance and the performance of other similar companies;
changes in the real estate industry, and in the retail industry, including growth in e-commerce, catalog companies and direct consumer sales;
our strategic decisions, such as acquisitions, dispositions, spin-offs, joint ventures, strategic investments or changes in business strategy;
equity issuances or buybacks by us or the perception that such issuances or buybacks may occur or adverse reaction market reaction to any indebtedness we incur;
increases in market interest rates;
decreases in our distributions to shareholders;
changes in real estate valuations or market valuations of similar companies;
additions or departures of key management personnel;
publication of research reports about us or our industry by securities analysts, or negative speculation in the press or investment community;
the passage of legislation or other regulatory developments that adversely affect us, our tax status, or our industry;
changes in accounting principles;
our failure to satisfy the listing requirements of the NYSE;
our failure to comply with the requirements of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act;


our failure to qualify as a REIT; and
15


general market conditions, including factors unrelated to our performance.
In the past, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the price of their common stock. This type of litigation could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention and resources, which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations.

We cannot guarantee the timing, amount, or payment of dividends on our common shares.
Although we expect to pay regular cash dividends, the timing, declaration, amount and payment of dividends to shareholders falls within the discretion of the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees’ decisions regarding the payment of dividends dependsdepend on factors such as our financial condition, earnings, capital requirements, debt service obligations, limitations under our financing arrangements, industry practice, legal requirements, regulatory constraints, and other considerations that it deems relevant. Our ability to pay dividends depends on our ongoing ability to generate cash from operations and access to the capital markets. Wemarkets, and therefore, we cannot guarantee that we will pay dividends in the future.

Your percentage of ownership in theour Company may be diluted in the future.
In the future, your ownership in us may be diluted because of equity issuances for acquisitions, capital market transactions or compensatory equity awards to our trustees, officers or employees, or otherwise. The issuance of additional common shares would dilute the interests of our current shareholders, and could depress the market price of our common shares, impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities, or impact our ability to pay dividends. We cannot predict the effect that future sales of our common shares or other equity-related securities including the issuance of Operating Partnership units would have on the market price of our common shares.
In addition, the Company’sour Declaration of Trust authorizes us to issue, without the approval of our shareholders, one or more classes or series of preferred shares having such designation, voting powers, preferences, rights and other terms, including preferences over our common shares respecting dividends and other distributions, as the Board of Trustees generally may determine. The terms of one or more classes or series of preferred shares could dilute the voting power or reduce the value of our common shares. For example, we could grant the holders of preferred shares the right to elect some number of our trustees in all events or on the occurrence of specified events, or the right to veto specified transactions. Similarly, the repurchase or redemption rights or liquidation preferences we could assign to holders of preferred shares could affect the residual value of the common shares.

Increases in market interest rates may result in a decrease in the value of our publicly-traded equity securities.
One of the factors that may influence the prices of our publicly-traded equity securities is the interest rate on our debt and the dividend yield on our common shares relative to market interest rates. If market interest rates, which are currently at low levels relative to historical rates, rise, our borrowing costs could rise and result in less funds being available for distribution. Therefore, we may not be able to, or we may choose not to, provide a higher distribution rate on our common stock. In addition, fluctuations in interest rates could adversely affect the market value of our properties. These factors could result in a decline in the market prices of our publicly-traded equity securities.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR ORGANIZATION AND STRUCTURE
16

The Company’s Declaration of Trust sets limits on the ownership of our shares.
Generally, for us to maintain a qualification as a REIT under the Code, not more than fifty percent (50%) in value of the outstanding shares of beneficial interest of the Company may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals at any time during the last half of the Company’s taxable year. The Code defines “individuals” for purposes of the requirement described in the preceding sentence to include some types of entities. Under the Company’s Declaration of Trust, no person or entity (or group thereof) may own more than 9.8% (in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of our outstanding shares of any class or series, with some exceptions for persons or entities approved by the Board of Trustees. A transfer of shares of beneficial interest of the Company to a person who, as a result of the transfer, violates the ownership limit will be void under certain circumstances, and, in any event, would deny that person any of the economic benefits of owning shares in excess of the ownership limit. These restrictions on transferability and ownership may delay, deter or prevent a change in control of the Company or other transaction that might involve a premium price or otherwise be in the best interest of the shareholders.

The Company’s Declaration of Trust limits the removal of members of the Board of Trustees.
The Company’s Declaration of Trust provides that, subject to the rights of holders of one or more classes or series of preferred shares to elect or remove one or more trustees, a trustee may be removed only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast in the election of trustees. This provision, when coupled with the exclusive power of the


Board of Trustees to fill vacancies on the Board of Trustees, precludes shareholders from removing incumbent trustees except for cause and upon a substantial affirmative vote and filling the vacancies created by the removal with their own nominees. These limitations may delay, deter or prevent a change in control of the Company or other transactions that might involve a premium price or otherwise be in the best interest of our shareholders.

Maryland law contains provisions that may reduce the likelihood of certain takeover transactions.
Certain provisions of Maryland law, may have the effect of inhibiting a third-party from making a proposal to acquire us or of impeding a change in control under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of our shares, including:
“Business combination” provisions that, subject to certain exceptions, prohibit certain business combinations between us and an “interested shareholder” (defined generally as any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of our shares or an affiliate thereof or an affiliate or associate of ours who was the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 10% or more of the voting power of our then outstanding voting shares at any time within the two-year period immediately prior to the date in question) for five years after the most recent date on which the shareholder becomes an interested shareholder, and thereafter impose fair price or super majority shareholder voting requirements on these combinations; and
“Control share” provisions that provide that holders of “control shares” of the Company (defined as shares that, when aggregated with other shares controlled by the shareholder, entitle the shareholder to exercise voting power in the election of trustees within one of three increasing ranges) acquired in a “control share acquisition” (defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of ownership or control of the voting power of issued and outstanding “control shares,” subject to certain exceptions) have no voting rights with respect to their control shares, except to the extent approved by our shareholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding all interested shares.
As permitted by Maryland law, the Company’s Bylaws provide that we will not be subject to the control share provisions of Maryland law. However, we cannot assure you that the Board of Trustees will not revise the Company’s Bylaws in order to be subject to such control share provisions in the future.
Certain provisions of Maryland law permit the board of trustees of a Maryland real estate investment trust with at least three independent trustees and a class of shares registered under the Exchange Act, without shareholder approval and regardless of what is currently provided in its declaration of trust or bylaws, to implement certain corporate governance provisions, some of which (for example, implementing a classified board) are not currently applicable to us. These provisions may have the effect of limiting or precluding a third party from making an unsolicited acquisition proposal for the Company or of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of shares of our shares with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then current market price.

We may issue additional shares in a manner that could adversely affect the likelihood of certain takeover transactions.
The Company’s Declaration of Trust and Bylaws authorize the Board of Trustees in its sole discretion and without shareholder approval, to:
cause the Company to issue additional authorized, but unissued, common or preferred shares;
classify or reclassify, in one or more classes or series, any unissued common or preferred shares;
set the preferences, rights and other terms of any classified or reclassified shares that the Company issues; and
increase the number of shares of beneficial interest that the Company may issue.
The Board of Trustees can establish a class or series of common or preferred shares whose terms could delay, deter or prevent a change in control of the Company or other transaction that might involve a premium price or otherwise be in the best interest of the Company’s shareholders. The Company’s Declaration of Trust and Bylaws contain other provisions that may delay, deter or prevent a change in control of the Company or other transaction that might involve a premium price or otherwise be in the best interest of our shareholders and the Company.


14



ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

There are no unresolved comments from the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

As of December 31, 2019,2021, our portfolio is comprised of 7468 shopping centers, fourfive malls and a warehouse parktwo industrial parks totaling approximately 15.217.0 million square feet.sf. We own our four malls, warehouse parktwo industrial parks and 5753 shopping centers 100% in fee simple. We own a 95% interest in Walnut Creek (Mt. Diablo), an 82.5% interest in Sunrise Mall in Massapequa, NY and lease 1614 of our shopping center properties under ground and/or building leases. As of December 31, 2019,2021, we had $1.6$1.7 billion of outstanding mortgage indebtedness which is secured by our properties. The following pages provide details of our properties as of December 31, 2019.2021.
Property
Total Square Feet (1)
Percent Leased(1)
Weighted Average Annual Rent per sq ft (2)
Major Tenants
SHOPPING CENTERS AND MALLS:
California:
Walnut Creek (Olympic)31,000 100.0%80.50Anthropologie
Walnut Creek (Mt. Diablo)(4)
7,000 43.8%72.00Sweetgreen (lease not commenced)
Connecticut:
Newington189,000 90.0%9.75Walmart, Staples
Maryland:
Towson (Goucher Commons)155,000 92.5%24.25Staples, HomeGoods, Five Below, Ulta, Kirkland's, Sprouts, DSW
Rockville94,000 98.0%25.01Regal Entertainment Group
Wheaton (leased through 2060)(3)
66,000 100.0%18.27Best Buy
Woodmore Towne Centre(6)
712,000 96.7%17.43Costco, Wegmans, At Home, Best Buy, LA Fitness, Nordstrom Rack
Massachusetts:
Cambridge (leased through 2033)(3)
48,000 62.1%31.46PetSmart
Revere (Wonderland Marketplace)140,000 100.0%13.33Big Lots, Planet Fitness, Marshalls, Get Air
Missouri:
Manchester131,000 100.0%11.55Academy Sports, Bob's Discount Furniture, Pan-Asia Market
New Hampshire:
Salem (leased through 2102)(3)
39,000 100.0%10.00Fun City
New Jersey:
Bergen Town Center - East, Paramus253,000 93.8%22.39Lowe's, REI, Best Buy
Bergen Town Center - West, Paramus1,058,000 90.6%30.82Target, Whole Foods Market, Burlington, Marshalls, Nordstrom Rack, Saks Off 5th, HomeGoods, H&M, Bloomingdale's Outlet, Nike Factory Store, Old Navy, Kohl's (lease not commenced)
Brick278,000 97.0%19.95Kohl's, ShopRite, Marshalls, Old Navy
Carlstadt (leased through 2050)(3)
78,000 98.5%24.22Stop & Shop
Cherry Hill (Plaza at Cherry Hill)422,000 73.0%14.40LA Fitness, Aldi, Raymour & Flanigan, Restoration Hardware, Total Wine, Guitar Center, Sam Ash Music
East Brunswick427,000 100.0%14.76Lowe's, Kohl's, Dick's Sporting Goods, P.C. Richard & Son, T.J. Maxx, LA Fitness
East Hanover (200 - 240 Route 10 West)343,000 99.2%21.73The Home Depot, Dick's Sporting Goods, Saks Off Fifth, Marshalls, Paper Store
East Rutherford197,000 100.0%12.85Lowe's
17


Property
Total Square Feet (1)
 
Percent Leased(1)
 
Weighted Average Annual Rent per sq ft (2)
 Major Tenants
        
SHOPPING CENTERS AND MALLS:  
California:       
Signal Hill45,000
 100.0% $26.49 Best Buy
Vallejo (leased through 2043)(3)
45,000
 100.0% 12.00 Best Buy
Walnut Creek (Olympic)31,000
 100.0% 70.00 Anthropologie
Walnut Creek (Mt. Diablo)(4)
7,000
 —%   
        
Connecticut:       
Newington189,000
 100.0% 9.97 Walmart, Staples
        
Maryland:       
Baltimore (Towson)155,000
 98.6% 24.47 Staples, HomeGoods, Tuesday Morning, Five Below, Ulta, Kirkland's, Sprouts, DSW (lease not commenced)
Rockville94,000
 98.0% 27.17 Regal Entertainment Group
Wheaton (leased through 2060)(3)
66,000
 100.0% 16.70 Best Buy
        
Massachusetts:       
Cambridge (leased through 2033)(3)
48,000
 100.0% 24.57 PetSmart, A.C. Moore
Revere (Wonderland Marketplace)140,000
 100.0% 13.16 Big Lots, Planet Fitness, Marshalls, Get Air
        
Missouri:       
Manchester131,000
 100.0% 11.22 Academy Sports, Bob's Discount Furniture, Pan-Asia Market
        
New Hampshire:       
Salem (leased through 2102)(3)
39,000
 100.0% 10.51 Fun City (lease not commenced)
        
New Jersey:       
Bergen Town Center - East, Paramus253,000
 97.5% 21.78 Lowe's, REI, Kirkland's, Best Buy
Bergen Town Center - West, Paramus1,059,000
 97.8% 32.83 Target, Century 21, Whole Foods Market, Burlington, Marshalls, Nordstrom Rack, Saks Off 5th, HomeGoods, H&M, Bloomingdale's Outlet, Nike Factory Store, Old Navy, Nieman Marcus Last Call Studio
Brick278,000
 94.7% 19.32 Kohl's, ShopRite, Marshalls, Kirkland's
Carlstadt (leased through 2050)(3)
78,000
 100.0% 23.79 Stop & Shop
Cherry Hill (Plaza at Cherry Hill)422,000
 73.0% 14.43 LA Fitness, Aldi, Raymour & Flanigan, Restoration Hardware, Total Wine, Guitar Center, Sam Ash Music
East Brunswick427,000
 100.0% 14.52 Lowe's, Kohl's, Dick's Sporting Goods, P.C. Richard & Son, T.J. Maxx, LA Fitness
East Hanover (200 - 240 Route 10 West)343,000
 99.2% 21.68 The Home Depot, Dick's Sporting Goods, Saks Off Fifth, Marshalls, Paper Store


Garfield298,000 100.0%15.82Walmart, Burlington, Marshalls, PetSmart, Ulta
Hackensack275,000 99.4%23.97The Home Depot, Staples, Petco, 99 Ranch
Hazlet95,000 100.0%3.70
Stop & Shop(5)
Jersey City (Hudson Mall)382,000 85.4%18.14Marshalls, Big Lots, Retro Fitness, Staples, Old Navy, National retailer (lease not commenced)
Jersey City (Hudson Commons)236,000 100.0%13.90Lowe's, P.C. Richard & Son
Kearny116,000 100.0%23.17LA Fitness, Marshalls, Ulta
Lodi (Washington Street)(6)
43,000 100.0%20.08Dollar Tree
Manalapan208,000 87.7%20.44Best Buy, Bed Bath & Beyond, Raymour & Flanigan, PetSmart, Avalon Flooring
Marlton218,000 100.0%16.49Kohl's, ShopRite, PetSmart
Middletown (Town Brook Commons)231,000 98.9%13.92Kohl's, Stop & Shop
Millburn104,000 88.3%28.70Trader Joe's, CVS, PetSmart
Montclair18,000 100.0%32.00Whole Foods Market
Morris Plains (Briarcliff Commons)179,000 94.8%23.08Kohl's, Uncle Giuseppe's
North Bergen (Kennedy Commons)62,000 100.0%14.55Food Bazaar
North Bergen (Tonnelle Commons)408,000 100.0%21.89Walmart, BJ's Wholesale Club, PetSmart
North Plainfield (West End Commons)241,000 99.1%11.58Costco, The Tile Shop, La-Z-Boy, Petco, Da Vita Dialysis
Paramus (leased through 2033)(3)
63,000 100.0%44.5624 Hour Fitness
Rockaway189,000 93.1%14.51ShopRite, T.J. Maxx
South Plainfield (Stelton Commons) (leased through 2039)(3)
56,000 100.0%21.97Staples, Party City
Totowa271,000 100.0%18.30The Home Depot, Bed Bath & Beyond, buybuy Baby, Marshalls, Staples
Union (2445 Springfield Ave)232,000 100.0%17.85The Home Depot
Union (West Branch Commons)278,000 98.7%16.60Lowe's, Burlington
Watchung (Greenbrook Commons)170,000 100.0%18.54BJ's Wholesale Club
Woodbridge (Woodbridge Commons)225,000 94.7%13.27Walmart, Charisma Furniture
Woodbridge (Plaza at Woodbridge)332,000 91.9%19.04Best Buy, Raymour & Flanigan, Lincoln Tech, Retro Fitness, Bed Bath & Beyond and buybuy Baby
New York:
Bronx (Gun Hill Commons)81,000 100.0%36.85Planet Fitness, Aldi
Bronx (Bruckner Commons)(6)
396,000 39.4%44.96ShopRite, Burlington
Bronx (Shops at Bruckner)115,000 85.2%38.73Marshalls, Old Navy, Aldi (lease not commenced), Five Below (lease not commenced)
Brooklyn (Kingswood Center)129,000 84.3%35.83T.J. Maxx, Visiting Nurse Service of NY
Brooklyn (Kingswood Crossing)107,000 69.5%41.72Target, Marshalls, Maimonides Medical
Buffalo (Amherst Commons)311,000 98.1%10.94BJ's Wholesale Club, T.J. Maxx, Burlington, HomeGoods, LA Fitness
Dewitt (Marshall Plaza) (leased through 2041)(3)
46,000 100.0%24.62Best Buy
Freeport (Meadowbrook Commons) (leased through 2040)(3)
44,000 100.0%22.31Bob's Discount Furniture
Freeport (Freeport Commons)173,000 100.0%26.32The Home Depot, Staples
Huntington216,000 71.6%19.70Marshalls, ShopRite (lease not commenced), Old Navy, Petco
Inwood (Burnside Commons)100,000 29.3%27.96
Mt. Kisco189,000 98.5%17.20Target, Stop & Shop
New Hyde Park (leased through 2029)(3)
101,000 100.0%21.93Stop & Shop
Queens (Cross Bay Commons)45,000 83.8%42.29Northwell Health
Rochester (Henrietta) (leased through 2056)(3)
165,000 100.0%4.65Kohl's
Staten Island (Forest Commons)165,000 96.6%24.68Western Beef, Planet Fitness, Mavis Discount Tire, NYC Public School
Yonkers Gateway Center
448,000 91.6%15.80Burlington, Marshalls, Homesense, Best Buy, DSW, PetSmart, Alamo Drafthouse Cinema
18


East Hanover (280 Route 10 West)28,000
 100.0% 34.71 REI
East Rutherford197,000
 98.3% 12.71 Lowe's
Garfield289,000
 100.0% 15.22 Walmart, Burlington, Marshalls, PetSmart, Ulta
Hackensack275,000
 99.4% 23.67 The Home Depot, Staples, Petco, 99 Ranch
Hazlet95,000
 100.0% 3.70 
Stop & Shop(5)
Jersey City (Hudson Mall)382,000
 80.8% 16.94 Marshalls, Big Lots, Retro Fitness, Staples, Old Navy
Jersey City (Hudson Commons)236,000
 100.0% 12.62 Lowe's, P.C. Richard & Son
Kearny114,000
 100.0% 21.86 LA Fitness, Marshalls, Ulta
Lawnside151,000
 100.0% 16.31 The Home Depot, PetSmart
Lodi (Route 17 North)171,000
 —%   
Lodi (Washington Street)85,000
 87.6% 22.06 Blink Fitness, Aldi
Manalapan208,000
 100.0% 19.10 Best Buy, Bed Bath & Beyond, Raymour & Flanigan, PetSmart, Avalon Flooring (lease not commenced)
Marlton218,000
 100.0% 15.96 Kohl's, ShopRite, PetSmart
Middletown (Town Brook Commons)231,000
 96.9% 13.92 Kohl's, Stop & Shop
Millburn104,000
 98.8% 26.41 Trader Joe's, CVS, PetSmart
Montclair21,000
 100.0% 26.20 Whole Foods Market
Morris Plains (Briarcliff Commons)182,000
 70.2% 25.59 Kohl's
North Bergen (Kennedy Blvd)62,000
 100.0% 14.36 Food Bazaar
North Bergen (Tonnelle Ave)410,000
 99.5% 21.73 Walmart, BJ's Wholesale Club, PetSmart, Staples
North Plainfield (West End Commons)241,000
 100.0% 11.56 Costco, The Tile Shop, La-Z-Boy, Petco, Da Vita Dialysis
Paramus (leased through 2033)(3)
63,000
 100.0% 47.18 24 Hour Fitness
Rockaway189,000
 95.2% 14.71 ShopRite, T.J. Maxx
South Plainfield (Stelton Commons) (leased through 2039)(3)
56,000
 96.3% 21.36 Staples, Party City
Totowa271,000
 100.0% 17.45 The Home Depot, Bed Bath & Beyond, buybuy Baby, Marshalls, Staples
Turnersville98,000
 100.0% 9.94 At Home, Verizon Wireless
Union (2445 Springfield Ave)232,000
 100.0% 17.85 The Home Depot
Union (Route 22 and Morris Ave)278,000
 98.9% 17.11 Lowe's, Burlington, Office Depot
Watchung (Greenbrook Commons)170,000
 94.9% 18.15 BJ's Wholesale Club
Westfield (One Lincoln Plaza)22,000
 89.9% 33.00 Five Guys, PNC Bank
Woodbridge (Woodbridge Commons)225,000
 94.7% 13.04 Walmart, Charisma Furniture
Woodbridge (Plaza at Woodbridge)337,000
 74.1% 18.88 Best Buy, Raymour & Flanigan, Lincoln Tech, Harbor Freight, Retro Fitness
        
New York:       
Bronx (1750-1780 Gun Hill Road)81,000
 100.0% 35.30 Planet Fitness, Aldi
Bronx (Bruckner Commons)375,000
 82.1% 27.09 Kmart, ShopRite, Burlington
Bronx (Shops at Bruckner)115,000
 100.0% 37.51 Marshalls, Old Navy, LA Fitness (lease not commenced)
Buffalo (Amherst Commons)311,000
 98.1% 10.94 BJ's Wholesale Club, T.J. Maxx, Burlington, HomeGoods, LA Fitness
Commack (leased through 2021)(3)
47,000
 100.0% 20.69 PetSmart, Ace Hardware
Dewitt (Marshall Plaza) (leased through 2041)(3)
46,000
 100.0% 22.38 Best Buy
Freeport (Meadowbrook Commons) (leased through 2040)(3)
44,000
 100.0% 22.31 Bob's Discount Furniture
Freeport (Freeport Commons)173,000
 100.0% 22.23 The Home Depot, Staples
Huntington204,000
 43.8% 22.84 Marshalls, Old Navy, Petco
Inwood (Burnside Commons)100,000
 96.5% 19.42 Stop & Shop
Mt. Kisco189,000
 95.9% 16.74 Target, Stop & Shop
New Hyde Park (leased through 2029)(3)
101,000
 100.0% 21.93 Stop & Shop
Queens (Cross Bay Commons)46,000
 78.7% 41.64  
Rochester (Henrietta) (leased through 2056)(3)
165,000
 100.0% 4.62 Kohl's
Staten Island (Forest Commons)165,000
 96.3% 23.69 Western Beef, Planet Fitness, Mavis Discount Tire, NYC Public School


Yonkers Gateway Center
437,000
 97.2% 17.15 Burlington, Marshalls, Homesense, Best Buy, DSW, PetSmart, Alamo Drafthouse Cinema
  
Pennsylvania:  Pennsylvania:
Bensalem (Marten Commons)185,000
 96.6% 12.73 Kohl's, Ross Dress for Less, Staples, PetcoBensalem (Marten Commons)185,000 96.6%14.59Kohl's, Ross Dress for Less, Staples, Petco
Bethlehem (Easton Commons)153,000
 94.5% 8.50 Giant Food, Petco
Broomall169,000
 100.0% 10.31 
Giant Food(5), Planet Fitness, A.C. Moore, PetSmart
Broomall(6)
Broomall(6)
169,000 64.1%16.56National retailer (lease not commenced), Planet Fitness, PetSmart
Glenolden (MacDade Commons)102,000
 100.0% 12.81 WalmartGlenolden (MacDade Commons)102,000 100.0%12.89Walmart
Lancaster (Lincoln Plaza)228,000
 100.0% 4.94 Lowe's, Community Aid, Mattress FirmLancaster (Lincoln Plaza)228,000 100.0%5.17Lowe's, Community Aid, Mattress Firm
Springfield (leased through 2025)(3)
41,000
 100.0% 22.99 PetSmart
Springfield (leased through 2025)(3)
41,000 100.0%25.29PetSmart
Wilkes-Barre (461 - 499 Mundy Street)179,000
 82.9% 13.57 Bob's Discount Furniture, Ross Dress for Less, Marshalls, Petco, Tuesday Morning
Wilkes-BarreWilkes-Barre184,000 88.1%12.89Bob's Discount Furniture, Ross Dress for Less, Marshalls, Petco, Wren Kitchen (lease not commenced)
Wyomissing (leased through 2065)(3)
76,000
 100.0% 16.76 LA Fitness, PetSmart
Wyomissing (leased through 2065)(3)
76,000 100.0%14.70LA Fitness, PetSmart
  
South Carolina:  South Carolina:
Charleston (leased through 2063)(3)
45,000
 100.0% 15.10 Best Buy
Charleston (leased through 2063)(3)
45,000 100.0%15.10Best Buy
  
Virginia:  Virginia:
Norfolk (leased through 2069)(3)
114,000
 100.0% 7.08 BJ's Wholesale Club
Norfolk (leased through 2069)(3)
114,000 100.0%7.79BJ's Wholesale Club
  
Puerto Rico:  Puerto Rico:
Las Catalinas356,000
 54.8% 45.34 Forever 21, Old NavyLas Catalinas356,000 85.4%28.84Sector Sixty6 (lease not commenced), Forever 21, Old Navy
Montehiedra539,000
 95.3% 18.64 Kmart, The Home Depot, Marshalls, Caribbean Cinemas, Tiendas Capri, Old Navy
Montehiedra(6)
Montehiedra(6)
540,000 69.0%20.80The Home Depot, Marshalls, Caribbean Cinemas, Tiendas Capri, Old Navy
Total Shopping Centers and Malls14,277,000
 92.4% $19.22 Total Shopping Centers and Malls14,469,000 91.1%$19.70
  
WAREHOUSES:  
East Hanover Warehouses943,000
 100.0% 5.70 J & J Tri-State Delivery, Foremost Groups, PCS Wireless, Fidelity Paper & Supply, Meyer Distributing, Consolidated Simon Distributors, Givaudan Flavors, Reliable Tire, LineMart
INDUSTRIAL:INDUSTRIAL:
East Hanover Warehouses(7)
East Hanover Warehouses(7)
1,218,000 100.0%5.63J & J Tri-State Delivery, Foremost Groups, PCS Wireless, Fidelity Paper & Supply, Meyer Distributing, Givaudan Flavors, Reliable Tire, LineMart, Nutra-Med
Lodi (Route 17 North)Lodi (Route 17 North)127,000 100.0%9.95AAA Wholesale Group
Total IndustrialTotal Industrial1,345,000 100.0%$6.04
Massapequa, NY (Sunrise Mall) (portion leased through 2069)(3)(4)(6)
Massapequa, NY (Sunrise Mall) (portion leased through 2069)(3)(4)(6)
1,217,000 49.2%8.50Macy's, Dick's Sporting Goods, Dave & Busters, Raymour & Flanigan
Total Urban Edge Properties15,220,000
 92.9% $18.31 Total Urban Edge Properties17,031,000 88.8%$18.04
(1) Percent leased is expressed as the percentage of gross leasable area subject to a lease.lease, excluding temporary tenants. The Company also excludes 132,000 sf of self-storage from the report above.
(2) Weighted average annual base rent per square foot is the current base rent on an annualized basis. It includesincluding ground leases and executed leases for which rent has not commenced and excludes tenant expense reimbursements,is calculated by annualizing tenants’ current base rent (excluding any free rent periods,periods), and excluding tenant reimbursements, concessions and storage rent. Excluding the ground leases where the Company is the lessor, the weighted average annual rent per square foot for our retail portfolio is $21.18$20.08 per square foot.
(3) The Company is a lessee under a ground or building lease. Ground and building lease terms include exercised options and options that may be exercised in future periods. For building leases, theThe total square feet disclosed for the building will revert to the lessor upon lease expiration. At Salem, the ground lease is for a portion of the parking area only.
(4) Our ownershipWe own 95% of Walnut Creek (Mt. Diablo) is 95%.and 82.5% of Sunrise Mall with the remaining portions in each case owned by joint venture partners.
(5) The tenant never commenced operations at this location but continues to pay rent.

(6) Not included in the same-property pool for the purposes of calculating same-property NOI for the quarter ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
(7) Includes acquisitions of 151 Ridgedale Avenue and 601 Murray Road. These properties are included in our non-same property pool for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2021.

As of December 31, 2019,2021, we had approximately 1,100900 leases. Tenant leases for under 10,000 square feet generally have lease terms of five years or less. Tenant leases forcomprising 10,000 square feet or more generally have lease terms of 10 to 25 years, and are considered anchor leases with one or more renewal options available upon expiration of the initial lease term. The majority of our leases provide for reimbursements of real estate taxes, insurance and common area maintenance charges (including roof and structure in shopping centers, unless it is the tenant’s direct responsibility), and percentage rents based on tenant sales volume. Percentage rents accounted for 1%approximately 2% of our total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019.2021.









19





Occupancy

The following table sets forth the consolidated retail portfolio leased occupancy rate (excluding warehousesindustrial and self-storage space), square footage and weighted average annual base rent per square foot of properties in our retail portfolio as of December 31 for the last five years:
December 31,
2021(1)
2020201920182017
Total square feet14,469,000 15,221,000 14,277,000 15,407,000 15,743,000 
Occupancy rate91.1 %88.7 %92.4 %92.6 %96.0 %
Average annual base rent per sf$19.70 $18.97 $19.22 $17.90 $17.38 
  December 31,
  2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Total square feet 14,277,000
 15,407,000
 15,743,000
 13,831,000
 13,901,000
Occupancy rate 92.4% 92.6% 96.0% 97.2% 96.2%
Average annual base rent per sf 
$19.22
 
$17.90
 
$17.38
 
$17.07
 
$16.64
(1) Excludes Sunrise Mall for the year ended December 31, 2021.

The following table sets forth the occupancy rate, square footage and weighted average annual base rent per square foot of our warehousesindustrial properties as of December 31 for the last five years:
December 31,
20212020201920182017
Total square feet1,345,000 1,070,000 943,000 942,000 942,000 
Occupancy rate100.0 %100.0 %100.0 %100.0 %100.0 %
Average annual base rent per sf$6.04 $6.34 $5.70 $5.34 $5.15 
  December 31,
  2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Total square feet 943,000
 942,000
 942,000
 942,000
 942,000
Occupancy rate 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 91.7% 79.1%
Average annual base rent per sf 
$5.70
 
$5.34
 
$5.15
 
$4.77
 
$4.80

Major Tenants

The following table sets forth information for the 10our ten largest tenants by total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019:2021:
Tenant Number of Stores Square Feet % of Total Square Feet 2019 Revenues (in thousands) % of Total RevenuesTenantNumber of StoresSquare Feet% of Total Square Feet
2021 Revenues(1)
(in thousands)
% of Total Revenues
The TJX Companies, Inc.(2)
The TJX Companies, Inc.(2)
22714,7314.2%$20,5894.8%
The Home Depot, Inc. 7
 920,000
 6.0% $23,032
 5.9%The Home Depot, Inc.6808,9264.8%19,9044.7%
The TJX Companies, Inc.(1)
 19
 646,000
 4.2% 14,778
 3.8%
Lowe's Companies, Inc. 6
 976,000
 6.4% 13,372
 3.4%Lowe's Companies, Inc.6976,4155.7%13,5703.2%
Walmart Inc.Walmart Inc.5708,4354.2%12,6923.0%
Burlington Stores, Inc.Burlington Stores, Inc.7415,8282.4%10,1062.4%
Best Buy Co., Inc. 9
 405,000
 2.7% 11,836
 3.1%Best Buy Co., Inc.8359,5512.1%9,7312.3%
Ahold Delhaize(2)
 8
 590,000
 3.9% 11,706
 3.0%
Walmart Inc. 5
 727,000
 4.8% 10,460
 2.7%
Kohl's Corporation 7
 633,000
 4.2% 9,539
 2.5%Kohl's Corporation7633,3453.7%9,0872.1%
PetSmart, Inc. 12
 287,000
 1.9% 9,044
 2.3%
BJ's Wholesale Club 4
 454,000
 3.0% 8,395
 2.2%BJ's Wholesale Club4454,2972.7%8,2631.9%
Wakefern (ShopRite) 4
 296,000
 1.9% 7,385
 1.9%Wakefern (ShopRite)4296,0181.7%7,2841.7%
PetSmart, Inc.PetSmart, Inc.10228,8691.3%7,1371.7%
(1) Based on contractual revenues as determined by the tenants’ operating lease agreements.
(2) Includes Marshalls (13)(14), T.J. Maxx (3)(4), HomeGoods (2)(3) and Homesense (1).
(2) Includes Stop & Shop (6) and Giant Food (2).















20





Lease Expirations

The following table sets forth the anticipated expirations of tenant leases in our consolidated retail portfolio for each year from 20202022 through 20302032 and thereafter, assuming no exercise of renewal options or early termination rights:
   Percentage of Weighted Average AnnualPercentage ofWeighted Average Annual
 Number of Square Feet of Retail Properties Base Rent of Expiring LeasesNumber ofSquare Feet ofRetail PropertiesBase Rent of Expiring Leases
Year Expiring Leases Expiring Leases  Square Feet Total Per Square FootYearExpiring LeasesExpiring Leases Square FeetTotalPer Square Foot
     
Month-To-Month 26 77,000
 0.5% $2,110,570
 $27.41 Month-To-Month29113,000 0.8%$2,853,250 $25.25
2020 100 667,000
 4.7% 14,547,270
 21.81 
2021 97 811,000
 5.7% 20,566,960
 25.36 
2022 85 1,100,000
 7.7% 18,854,000
 17.14 202283486,000 3.4%13,379,580 27.53
2023 89 1,639,000
 11.5% 31,190,170
 19.03 20231061,145,000 7.9%25,361,750 22.15
2024 102 1,495,000
 10.5% 30,542,850
 20.43 20241041,551,000 10.7%31,314,690 20.19
2025 59 1,091,000
 7.6% 17,870,580
 16.38 2025801,234,000 8.5%23,248,560 18.84
2026 63 626,000
 4.4% 10,585,660
 16.91 202697891,000 6.2%20,635,560 23.16
2027 51 706,000
 5.0% 14,663,620
 20.77 2027841,065,000 7.4%17,540,550 16.47
2028 43 491,000
 3.4% 13,595,790
 27.69 202847653,000 4.5%18,395,010 28.17
2029 59 1,490,000
 10.4% 29,829,800
 20.02 2029701,526,000 10.5%33,358,360 21.86
2030 26 862,000
 6.0% 13,447,200
 15.60 2030431,191,000 8.2%18,543,870 15.57
2031203132909,000 6.3%15,053,040 16.56
2032203235347,000 2.4%7,318,230 21.09
Thereafter 42 2,144,000
 15.0% 32,160,000
 15.00 Thereafter482,064,000 14.3%31,909,440 15.46
Sub-total/Average 842 13,199,000
 92.4% $252,892,840
 $19.16 
Subtotal/AverageSubtotal/Average85813,175,000 91.1%$259,547,500 $19.70
Vacant 147 1,078,000
 7.6%  N/A
  N/A Vacant1851,294,000 8.9% N/A N/A
Total(1)
 989 14,277,000
 100.0% $252,892,840
  N/A 
Total(1)
1,04314,469,000 100.0%$259,547,500  N/A
(1) Total lease count excludes warehouseindustrial tenant leases, temporary tenant leases, and cart and kiosk leases.leases and Sunrise Mall.

ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are party to various legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, the outcome of such matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
ITEM 4.    MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.


19
21




PART II

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
ITEM 5.    MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Urban Edge Properties

Market Information and Dividends

Our common shares are listed on the NYSE under the symbol “UE”. Our common shares began “regular way” trading on January 15, 2015. As of February 11, 2020,9, 2022, there were approximately 1,4141,134 holders of record of our common shares.

The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT under sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), commencing with the filing of its 2015 tax return for its tax year ended December 31, 2015. With the exception of the Company’s taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”), to the extent the Company meets certain requirements under the Code, the Company will not be taxed on its federal taxable income. If we fail to qualify as a REIT for any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any alternative minimum tax, which, for corporations, was repealed under the TCJA (defined above) for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for the four subsequent taxable years.

Future distributions will be declared and paid at the discretion of the Board of Trustees and will depend upon cash generated by operating activities, our financial condition, capital requirements, annual dividend requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and such other factors as our Board of Trustees deems relevant.

Our Board of Trustees declared a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share for each of the four quarters in 2021, which resulted in a total annual dividendsdividend per common share and OP unit of $0.60 for 2019 were $0.882021. Our Board of Trustees declared a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share.common share and OP unit for the first quarter of 2020 and temporarily suspended quarterly dividend distributions for the second and third quarters as a result of COVID-19 and the uncertainties it generated. A special cash dividend of $0.46 per common share and OP unit was declared in December 2020, which resulted in a total annual dividend per common share and OP unit of $0.68 for 2020. The annual dividend amount may differ from dividends as calculated for federal income tax purposes. Distributions to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits for federal income tax purposes generally will be taxable to a shareholder as ordinary dividend income. However, the TCJA provides a deduction of up to 20% of a non-corporate taxpayer’s ordinary REIT dividends with such deduction scheduled to expire for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025. Distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits will be treated as a nontaxable reduction of the shareholder’s basis in such shareholder’s shares, to the extent thereof, and thereafter as taxable capital gains. Distributions that are treated as a reduction of the shareholder’s basis in its shares will have the effect of increasing the amount of gain, or reducing the amount of loss, recognized upon the sale of the shareholder’s shares. No assurances can be given regarding what portion, if any, of distributions in 20192021 or subsequent years will constitute a return of capital for federal income tax purposes. During a year in which a REIT earns a net long-term capital gain, the REIT can elect under Section 857(b)(3) of the Code to designate a portion of dividends paid to shareholders as capital gain dividends. If this election is made, the capital gain dividends are generally taxable to the shareholder as long-term capital gains.

We have determined the dividends paid on our common shares during 20192021 and 20182020 qualify for the following tax treatment:
Total Distribution per ShareOrdinary DividendsLong Term Capital GainsReturn of Capital
2021$0.60 $0.60 $— $— 
20200.68 0.68 — — 











22

 Total Distribution per Share Ordinary Dividends Long Term Capital Gains Return of Capital
2019$0.88
 $0.73
 $0.15
 $
20180.88
 0.88
 
 



















Total Shareholder Return Performance

The following performance graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return of our common shares with the Russell 2000 Index, the S&P 500 Index, Dow Jones Equity All REIT (previously SNL U.S. REIT Equity IndexIndex) and the Dow Jones US Real Estate Strip Centers (previously SNL REIT Retail Shopping Center IndexIndex) as provided by SNL Financial LC, from January 15, 2015 (the date of our separation from Vornado) tofor the six fiscal years commencing December 31, 2019,2015 and ending December 31, 2021, assuming an investment of $100 and the reinvestment of all dividends into additional common shares during the holding period. Historical stock performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

The performance graph shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this annual report into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except to the extent we specifically incorporate this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such acts.

COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN(1)
stockchart20.jpgue-20211231_g1.jpg
(1) $100 invested on January 15,December 31, 2015 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.

 
Cumulative(1) 
Total Return %
 Total Return $ as of
Cumulative(1)
Total Return %
Total Return $ as of
Stock/Index 1/15/2015 12/31/2015 12/31/2016 12/31/2017 12/31/2018 12/31/2019Stock/Index12/31/201512/31/201612/31/201712/31/201812/31/201912/31/202012/31/2021
UE (2.4) 100
 101.4
 122.6
 118.7
 80.7
 97.6
UE2.7100 120.9 116.0 78.9 95.4 67.7 102.7 
S&P 500 79.5 100
 104.7
 117.2
 142.8
 136.5
 179.5
S&P 500161.3100 112.0 136.4 130.4 171.5 203.0 261.3 
Russell 2000 54.9 100
 99.7
 120.9
 138.7
 123.4
 154.9
Russell 2000114.0100 121.3 139.1 123.8 155.4 186.4 214.0 
SNL U.S. REIT Equity 40.3 100
 97.1
 105.7
 114.5
 108.9
 140.3
SNL U.S. REIT Retail Shopping Center (3.1) 100
 98.9
 102.4
 91.1
 76.4
 96.9
Dow Jones Equity All REITDow Jones Equity All REIT96.4100 108.9 118.3 113.5 146.1 139.1 196.4 
Dow Jones US Real Estate Strip CentersDow Jones US Real Estate Strip Centers(1.0)100 103.3 92.4 78.9 100.2 68.8 99.0 
(1) Cumulative total return is for the period from the separation date on January 15, 2015 tosix fiscal years commencing December 31, 2019.2015 and ending December 31, 2021.

23





Operating Partnership

Market Information and Distributions

There is no established public market for our general and common limited partnership interests in the operating partnership (“OP Units”). As of February 11, 2020,9, 2022, there were 121,386,592117,398,896 general partnership units outstanding and 5,817,2234,412,654 common limited partnership units outstanding, held by approximately 1,4141,134 and 3740 holders of record, respectively.

Under the limited partnership agreement of UELP, unitholders may present their common units for redemption at any time (subject to restrictions agreed upon at the time of issuance of the units that may restrict such right for a period of time). Upon presentation of a common unit for redemption, UELP must redeem the unit for cash equal to the then value of a share of UE’s common shares, as defined by the limited partnership agreement. In lieu of cash redemption by UELP, however, UE may elect to acquire any common units so tendered by issuing common shares of UE in exchange for the common units. If UE so elects, its common shares will be exchanged for common units on a one-for-one basis. During the year ended December 31, 2019, 6,995,9412021, 100,000 units were redeemed for common shares and 357,998no units were redeemed for cash.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Shares

During the three monthsyear ended December 31, 2019,2021, the Company issued an aggregate of 134,249100,000 common shares in exchange for 134,249100,000 common limited partnership units held by certain limited partners of the Operating Partnership. All common shares were issued in reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. We relied on the exemption under Section 4(a)(2) based upon factual representations received from the limited partner who received the common shares.

Each time the Company issues common shares (other than in exchange for common limited partnership units when such units are presented for redemption), it contributes the proceeds of such issuance to the Operating Partnership in return for an equivalent number of partnership units with rights and preferences analogous to the shares issued. During the three monthsyear ended, December 31, 2019,2021, in connection with issuances of common shares by the Company pursuant to the Urban Edge Properties 2015 Employee Share Purchase Plan, the Operating Partnership issued an aggregate of 11,00524,544 common limited partnership units to the Company in exchange for approximately $0.2$0.3 million, the aggregate proceeds of such common share issuances to the Company. Such units were issued in reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

During 2019, 5,672the year ended December 31, 2021, 5,305 restricted common shares were forfeited by former employees in connection with their departure from the Company. We did not repurchase any of our equity securities during the three monthsyear ended December 31, 2019.2021. Our employees will at times surrender common shares owned by them to satisfy statutory minimum federal, state and local tax obligations associated with the vesting of their restricted common shares. During the three monthsyear ended December 31, 2019, no2021, 13,062 restricted common shares were surrendered.

In March 2020, our Board of Trustees authorized a share repurchase program for up to $200 million of the Company’s common shares. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we repurchased 5,873,923 shares at a weighted average share price of $9.22 amounting to $54.1 million. During the year ended December 31, 2021, no shares were repurchased.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Information regarding equity compensation plans is presented in Part III, Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference.

22



ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table includes selected consolidated and combined financial data set forth for the Company and the Operating Partnership as of and for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2019. The consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 reflects the consolidation of properties that are wholly-owned and properties in which we own less than 100% interest, but in which we have a controlling interest. The consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2019, December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 include the consolidated accounts of the Company. This selected financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, and our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Part II, Items 7 and 8, respectively, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Urban Edge Properties
 Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)2019 2018 2017 2016 
2015(4)
Operating Data:         
Rental revenue(1)
$384,405
 $411,298
 $365,082
 $321,719
 $316,484
Management and development fees1,900
 1,469
 1,535
 1,759
 2,261
Income from acquired leasehold interest
 
 39,215
 
 
Other income1,344
 1,393
 1,210
 2,498
 4,200
Total revenue387,649
 414,160
 407,042
 325,976
 322,945
Total expenses283,781
 292,295
 245,278
 192,958
 224,869
Net income116,197
 116,963
 72,938
 96,630
 41,348
Net income attributable to operating partnership(6,699) (11,768) (5,824) (5,812) (2,547)
Net (income) loss attributable to consolidated subsidiaries25
 (45) (44) (3) (16)
Net income attributable to common shareholders(2)
$109,523
 $105,150
 $67,070
 $90,815
 $38,785
          
Earnings per common share - Basic(3):
0.91
 0.92
 0.62
 0.91
 0.39
Earnings per common share - Diluted(3):
0.91
 0.92
 0.61
 0.91
 0.39
Weighted average shares outstanding - Basic(3)
119,751
 113,863
 107,132
 99,364
 99,252
Weighted average shares outstanding - Diluted(3)
119,896
 114,051
 118,390
 99,794
 99,278
Dividends declared per common share0.88
 0.88
 0.88
 0.82
 0.80
ITEM 6.    [RESERVED]
(1)
Not applicable.
In accordance with ASC 205 Presentation of Financial Statements, the Company reclassified Property rentals and Tenant reimbursement income to Rental revenue as reflected in this Form 10-K.
(2) Net income earned prior to January 15, 2015 is attributable to Vornado as it was the sole shareholder prior to January 15, 2015.
(3) The common shares outstanding at the date of separation are reflected as outstanding for all periods prior to the separation.
(4) The consolidated and combined statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2015 includes the consolidated accounts of the Company and the combined accounts of the UE Business. Accordingly, the results presented for the year ended December 31, 2015 reflect the aggregate operations, changes in cash flows and equity on a carved-out and combined basis for the period from January 1, 2015 through the date of separation and on a consolidated basis subsequent to the date of separation. The financial data for the periods prior to the separation date are prepared on a carved-out and combined basis from the consolidated financial statements of Vornado as the UE Business was under the control of Vornado prior to January 15, 2015.


24
 Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Balance Sheet Data as of period end:         
Real estate, net of accumulated depreciation$2,076,839
 $2,123,120
 $2,084,727
 $1,597,423
 $1,575,530
Total assets(1)
2,846,358
 2,798,994
 2,820,808
 1,904,138
 1,918,931
Mortgages payable, net1,546,195
 1,550,242
 1,564,542
 1,197,513
 1,233,983
Total liabilities(1)
1,831,582
 1,793,017
 1,830,267
 1,408,021
 1,447,477
Noncontrolling interests in operating partnership46,536
 100,822
 100,218
 35,451
 33,177
Total equity1,014,776
 1,005,977
 990,541
 496,117
 471,454
          
Other Data:         
Cash flow Statement Data:         
Provided by operating activities156,400
 137,040
 157,898
 137,249
 138,078
Used in investing activities(2,521) (64,803) (295,732) (59,230) (66,415)
(Used in) provided by financing activities(126,265) (115,556) 498,489
 (115,858) 93,795
(1) In accordance with the adoption of ASC 842 on January 1, 2019, the Company recognized right-of-use assets and lease liabilities included in the Company’s balances of total assets and total liabilities, respectively, as reflected in this Form 10-K.

Urban Edge Properties LP
 Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except per unit amounts)2019 2018 2017 2016 
2015(4)
Operating Data:         
Rental revenue(1)
$384,405
 $411,298
 $365,082
 $321,719
 $316,484
Management and development fees1,900
 1,469
 1,535
 1,759
 2,261
Income from acquired leasehold interest
 
 39,215
 
 
Other income1,344
 1,393
 1,210
 2,498
 4,200
Total revenue387,649
 414,160
 407,042
 325,976
 322,945
Total expenses283,781
 292,295
 245,278
 192,958
 224,869
Net income116,197
 116,963
 72,938
 96,630
 41,348
Net (income) loss attributable to consolidated subsidiaries25
 (45) (44) (3) (16)
Net income attributable to unitholders(2)
$116,222
 $116,918
 $72,894
 $96,627
 $41,332
          
Earnings per unit - Basic(3):
0.92
 0.92
 0.62
 0.91
 0.39
Earnings per unit - Diluted(3):
0.92
 0.92
 0.61
 0.91
 0.39
Weighted average units outstanding - Basic(3)
126,333
 126,198
 117,779
 105,455
 105,276
Weighted average units outstanding - Diluted(3)
126,478
 126,386
 118,390
 106,099
 105,374
Distributions declared per unit0.88
 0.88
 0.88
 0.82
 0.80
(1) In accordance with ASC 205, the Company reclassified Property rentals and Tenant reimbursement income to Rental revenue as reflected in this Form 10-K.
(2) Net income earned prior to January 15, 2015 is attributable to Vornado as it was the sole unitholder prior to January 15, 2015.
(3) The units outstanding at the date of separation are reflected as outstanding for all periods prior to the separation.
(4) The consolidated and combined statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2015 includes the consolidated accounts of the Company and the combined accounts of the UE Business. Accordingly, the results presented for the year ended December 31, 2015 reflect the aggregate operations, changes in cash flows and equity on a carved-out and combined basis for the period from January 1, 2015 through the date of separation and on a consolidated basis subsequent to the date of separation. The financial data for the periods prior to the separation date are prepared on a carved-out and combined basis from the consolidated financial statements of Vornado as the UE Business was under common control of Vornado prior to January 15, 2015.





 Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Balance Sheet Data as of period end:         
Real estate, net of accumulated depreciation$2,076,839
 $2,123,120
 $2,084,727
 $1,597,423
 $1,575,530
Total assets(1)
2,846,358
 2,798,994
 2,820,808
 1,904,138
 1,918,931
Mortgages payable, net1,546,195
 1,550,242
 1,564,542
 1,197,513
 1,233,983
Total liabilities(1)
1,831,582
 1,793,017
 1,830,267
 1,408,021
 1,447,477
Total equity1,014,776
 1,005,977
 990,541
 496,117
 471,454
          
Other Data:         
Cash flow Statement Data:         
Provided by operating activities156,400
 137,040
 157,898
 137,249
 138,078
Used in investing activities(2,521) (64,803) (295,732) (59,230) (66,415)
(Used in) provided by financing activities(126,265) (115,556) 498,489
 (115,858) 93,795
(1) In accordance with the adoption of ASC 842 on January 1, 2019, the Company recognized right-of-use assets and lease liabilities included in the Company’s balances of total assets and total liabilities, respectively, as reflected in this Form 10-K.


25



ITEM 7.
ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Certain statements contained herein constitute forward-looking statements as such term is defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. They represent our intentions, plans, expectations and beliefs and are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Our future results, financial condition and business may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. You can find many of these statements by looking for words such as “approximates,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “would,” “may” or other similar expressions in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Many of the factors that will determine the outcome of these and our other forward-looking statements are beyond our ability to control or predict; these factors include, among others, the impact of e-commerce; the loss of or bankruptcy of major tenants; general economic conditions and changes in the real estate market in particular; adverse economic conditions in the areas in which our properties are located; natural disasters; potentially higher costs related to our development, redevelopment and anchor repositioning projects, and our ability to lease these projects at projected rates; competition for acquisitions; the loss of key personnel; the availability of financing and changes in, and compliance with, tax law and REIT qualifications. For further discussion of factors that could materially affect the outcome of our forward-looking statements, see “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.
For these statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. We do not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to our forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

This section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K generally discusses 20192021 and 20182020 items and provides a year-to-year comparison between 20192021 and 2018.2020. A discussion of 20172019 items and year-to-year comparisons between 20182020 and 20172019 are not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K but can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.2020.

Executive Overview

Our Company
Urban Edge Properties (“UE”, “Urban Edge”, or the “Company”) (NYSE: UE) is a Maryland real estate investment trust that manages, develops, redevelops, and acquires retail real estate, primarily in the Washington, D.C. to Boston corridor with a concentration on the New York metropolitan area. Urban Edge Properties LP (“UELP” or the “Operating Partnership”) is a Delaware limited partnership formed to serve as UE’s majority-owned partnership subsidiary and to own, through affiliates, all of our real estate properties and other assets. Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Urban Edge Properties and UELP and their consolidated entities/subsidiaries.
The Operating Partnership’s capital includes general and common limited partnership interests in the operating partnership (“OP Units”). As of December 31, 2019,2021, Urban Edge owned approximately 95.4%96.2% of the outstanding common OP Units with the remaining limited OP Units held by members of management, Urban Edge’s Board of Trustees and contributors of property interests acquired. Urban Edge serves as the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. The third party unitholders have limited rights over the Operating Partnership such that they do not have characteristics of a controlling financial interest. As such, the Operating Partnership is considered a variable interest entity (“VIE”), and the Company is the primary beneficiary that consolidates it. The Company’s only investment is the Operating Partnership. The VIE’s assets can be used for purposes other than the settlement of the VIE’s obligations and the Company’s partnership interest is considered a majority voting interest.

As of December 31, 2019,2021, our portfolio was comprised 74of 68 shopping centers, fourfive malls and a warehouse parktwo industrial parks totaling approximately 15.217.0 million square feet.
Operating Strategy.
COVID-19 PandemicOur operating strategy is to maximize
On January 30, 2020, the valuespread of the COVID-19 outbreak was declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern by the World Health Organization ("WHO"). On March 11, 2020, the WHO characterized the COVID-19 outbreak as a global pandemic. Early in the pandemic, the tri-state area of Connecticut, New York and New Jersey enforced preventive measures including mandatory business closures for non-essential businesses and quarantines or “shelter-in-place” requirements. Given our geographic concentration in the Northeast, many of our tenants faced adverse financial consequences from reduced business operations and social distancing requirements as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Company’s results for 2020 were negatively impacted by tenant fallout from COVID-driven bankruptcies, uncollected or disputed rents from impacted tenants, and from abatements granted to tenants facing financial hardships due to the pandemic.
Throughout 2021, the widespread distribution of vaccines and reduction of restrictions boosted economic confidence and increased consumer spending, resulting in a strengthened existing assets through proactive management encompassing continuous asset evaluationretail tenant base and increase in demand for highest-and-best-use; efficientspace. The Company reached record leasing volumes with 161 total new leases, renewals and cost-conscious operations that minimize retailer operating expenseoptions, totaling approximately 2 million square feet. Foot traffic at our properties returned to near pre-pandemic levels, which has increased sales volume for our tenants and enhancewe have collected 98% of base rents billed during the year, inclusive of rent deferrals granted as part of our COVID-19 tenant relief efforts.

2021 Highlights
Set forth below are highlights of our development and redevelopment projects, property quality;acquisitions and targeteddispositions, and leasing activities:
Acquired Woodmore Towne Centre in December 2021 for a purchase price of $198.1 million, including transaction costs. The property, located in Glenarden, MD, sits on 83 acres including an adjacent 22-acre vacant land parcel and is anchored by top-tier national and regional tenants including grocers Wegmans and Costco;
Acquired two industrial warehouses aggregating 275,000 sf, for a total purchase price of $56.1 million, including transaction costs. The two properties, located at 601 Murray Road and 151 Ridgedale Avenue, are adjacent to desirable tenants. During 2019 we:our existing 943,000 sf warehouse park in East Hanover, NJ;
reported a decline in same-property cash Net Operating Income (“NOI”)(1) by 1.8% over the year ended December 31, 2018;
25


reported a decline of same-property portfolio occupancy(2) to 93.4% from 94.2% as of December 31, 2018;


Completed the sale of three properties, one property parcel and one ground lease and received proceeds of $37.3 million, net of selling costs, resulting in a $18.6 million net gain on sale of real estate;
reported a decline of consolidated portfolio occupancyto 92.9% from 93.6% as of December 31, 2018 due to anchor bankruptcies;
signed 39
Terminated our remaining leases with Kmart and Sears at Bruckner Commons, The Outlets at Montehiedra, and Sunrise Mall for $20 million, effective October 15, 2021. Controlling these anchor spaces is a critical aspect of the plans we have under way to reposition and redevelop these spaces;
Stabilized five redevelopment projects aggregating $29.3 million, two of which stabilized during the fourth quarter. The 102,000 sf CubeSmart self-storage facility developed on excess land at Tonnelle Commons reached 87% occupancy. Additionally, the build-out of Fun City was completed at our property in Salem, NH, which opened in November 2021;
Activated six new redevelopment projects related to anchor leases executed during the year. These projects have an estimated cost of $102.2 million, of which $95.2 million remains to be funded as of December 31, 2021 and are expected to generate an approximate 8% unleveraged yield;
Signed 57 new leases totaling 677,817 square feet, including 46 new leases totaling 368,779 square feet, including 31 new leases on a same-space(3) basis totaling 348,760 square feet at an average rental rate of $24.12 per square foot on a GAAP basis and $22.13 per square foot on a cash basis, and resulting in average rent spreads of 18.8% on a GAAP basis and 4.0% on a cash basis; and
renewed or extended 78 leases totaling 1,118,810 square feet, all on a same-space(1) basis totaling 431,386 square feet at an average rental rate of $20.25$21.15 per square foot on a GAAP basis and $19.90$19.43 per square foot on a cash basis, resulting in average rent spreads of 23.0% on a GAAP basis and 9.5% on a cash basis; and
Renewed or extended 104 leases totaling 1,259,467 square feet, including 97 leases on a same-space(1) basis totaling 1,247,758 square feet at an average rental rate of $20.69 per square foot on a GAAP basis and $20.52 per square foot on a cash basis, generating average rent spreads of 11.6%10.9% on a GAAP basis and 7.3%3.5% on a cash basis.
Investment Strategy.
2022 Outlook
Our investment strategy isWe intend to selectively deploy capital through redevelopmentcreate value and development of our existing assets and through acquisitions in our target markets that are expected to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns. At the same time, we plan to sell assets that no longer meet our investment criteria. During 2019, we:
advanced six projects with estimated gross costs of $38.1 million to active development and redevelopment projects including four anchor backfills; active projects as of December 31, 2019 have a total expected investment of $65.6 million of which $29.9 million remains to be funded;
completed 11 projects with total estimated gross costs of $167.2 million, of which $3.5 million remains to be funded; this includes projects at Bruckner Commons in the Bronx, NY, where the shopping center underwent a complete renovation including a new ShopRite and Burlington, and Bergen Town Center where we added Burlington and opened new restaurants, upgrading the food options at the mall;
identified approximately 13 additional development and redevelopment projects expected to be completed over the next several years;
acquired three assets, at an aggregate purchase price of $38.5 million and 195,300 sf, comprising one asset located in the Boston metropolitan area and two assets adjacent to our existing property, Bergen Town Center;
completed the sale of eight properties and received proceeds of $112.8 million, net of selling costs, resulting in a $68.6 million net gain on sale of real estate; and
sold our lessee position in a ground lease and received proceeds of $6.9 million, net of selling costs, resulting in a gain on sale of lease of $1.8 million.
Capital Strategy. Our capital strategy is to keep our balance sheet strong, flexible and capable of supporting growth by using cash flow from operations, refinancing debt when opportunities are favorable, issuing debt when appropriate and reinvesting funds from selective asset sales. During 2019, we:
amended our $600 million revolving credit facility, extending the maturity date from March 2021 to January 2024 with two six-month extension options. The amended facility contains terms and conditions materially consistent with the prior agreement except that borrowing rates are generally lower by 5 basis points depending on the Company's leverage level;
drew no amounts on our revolving credit agreement, of which $600 million remains available;
satisfied redemptions of certain OP unitholders by repurchasing 357,998 OP Units at a price of $16.70 per OP Unit, resulting in total cash consideration of $6.0 million; and
ended the year with cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash, of $485.1 million and debt, net of cash, to total market capitalization of 27%.
2020 Outlook. We seek growth ingrow earnings, funds from operations, and cash flows primarily by:
leasingAdding essential tenants to our properties and positioning our retail environments with quality grocers, premium healthcare operators and elevated food offerings;
Leasing vacant spaces, proactively extending expiring leases, at higher rents, processingmanaging the exercise of tenant options and, when possible, replacing underperforming tenants with tenantsoperators that can pay higher rents;rents and positively impact our properties;
expeditingExpediting the delivery of space to tenants and the collection of rents from tenants with executed leases that have not yet commenced;
creatingGenerating additional valueincome from our existing assets by redevelopment ofredeveloping underutilized existing space, development ofdeveloping new space and pad sites, repositioning anchors, and by anchor repositioning;incorporating non-retail uses such as industrial, self-storage, office and other uses;
acquiringAcquiring assets that meet our investment criteria.


There can be no assurance that we will be able to execute on our growth strategy, especially given the ongoing economic uncertainty. See Forward-Looking Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(1)Refer to page 34 for a reconciliation to the nearest GAAP measure.
(2)Information provided on a same-property basis excludes properties under development, redevelopment or that involve anchor repositioning where a substantial portion of the gross leasable area is taken out of service and also excludes properties acquired or sold during the periods being compared and totals 70 properties for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
(3) Same-space leases represent those leases signed on spaces for which there was a previous lease.





















26


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, referred to as “GAAP”, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that in certain circumstances affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and revenue and expenses. These estimates are prepared using management’s best judgment, after considering past and current events and economic conditions. In addition, certain information relied upon by management in preparing such estimates includes internally generated financial and operating information, external market information, when available, and when necessary, information obtained from consultations with third party experts. Actual results could differ from these estimates. A discussion of possible risks which may affect these estimates is included in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Management considers an accounting estimate to be critical if changes in the estimate could have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K; however, the most critical10-K. The following accounting policies, which involve the use of estimates and assumptions as to future uncertainties and, therefore, may result in actual amounts that differ from estimates are as follows:

considered critical because they are particularly dependent on management’s judgment about matters that have a significant level of uncertainty at the time the accounting estimates are made, and changes to those estimates could have a material impact on our financial condition or operating results.
Real Estate
Revenue Recognition and Receivables - Estimating Collectibility
Rental revenue comprises revenue from fixed and variable lease payments, as designated within tenant operating leases. The natureComponents of our businessthis include contractual rents arising from tenant operating lease agreements, tenant expense reimbursements, and straight-line rental income. We evaluate the collectibility of amounts due from tenants and disputed enforceable charges on both a lease-by-lease and a portfolio-level basis, which result from the inability of tenants to make required payments under their operating lease agreements. We recognize changes in the collectibility assessment of these operating leases as an owner, redeveloper and operator of retail shopping centers means that we invest significant amounts of capital into our properties. Depreciation, amortization and maintenance costs relatingadjustments to our properties constitute substantial costs for us as well as the industry as a whole. Real estate is capitalized and depreciated on a straight-line basisrental revenue in accordance with GAAPASC 842 Leases which are recorded as rental revenue deemed uncollectible and consistent with industry standardsare included within the line items Rental revenue on our consolidated statements of income.
Management exercises judgement when evaluating the collectibility of these receivables and will look to both quantitative and qualitative factors. Such factors include tenants’ current credit status, either from third parties or using an internal risk assessment, payment history, amount of outstanding receivables, tenant sales performance, potential liquidity and current economic and sector specific trends. Tenant receivables, and receivables arising from the straight-lining of rents, are written-off directly when management deems the collectibility of substantially all future lease payments from a specific lease is not probable, at which point, the Company will begin recognizing revenue from such leases prospectively, based on our best estimatesactual cash received. This write-off effectively reduces cumulative non-cash rental income recognized from the straight-lining of rents since lease commencement. If the Company subsequently determines that it is probable it will collect substantially all of the assets’ physicallessee’s remaining lease payments under the lease term, the Company will reinstate the receivable balance, including those arising from the straight-lining of rents. Changes in our assessments of collectibility are recognized as adjustments to rental revenue in accordance with ASC 842.
These assessments are inherently sensitive as they are based on the judgement of management and economic useful lives which range from oneinformation available at the time of evaluation. We routinely reassess the quantitative and qualitative factors used to 40 years.derive these estimates and believe the methods and assumptions noted above to be reasonable in evaluating collectibility. We periodically reviewhave not had any changes to the estimated lives of our assetsmethods or assumptions used to evaluate collectibility. Although we routinely reassess these estimates, taking into consideration all information available and implement changes, as necessary,future projections, they are subject to these estimates. These assessmentsuncertainty and have a direct impact on our net income. Real estate is carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciationActual results may differ from these estimates and amortization. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed to operations as they are incurred. Significant renovations that improve or extend the useful lives of assets are capitalized.can have a material impact on our operating results.

Real estate undergoing redevelopment activities is also carried at cost but no depreciation is recognized. All property operating expenses directly associated withEstate - Estimates Related to Valuing Acquired Assets and attributable to the redevelopment, including interest, are capitalized to the extent the capitalized costs of the property do not exceed the estimated fair value of the property when completed. If the cost of the redeveloped property, including the net book value of the existing property, exceeds the estimated fair value of redeveloped property, the excess is charged to impairment expense. The capitalization period begins when redevelopment activities are underway and ends when the project is substantially complete. Generally, a redevelopment is considered substantially completed and ready for its intended use upon completion of tenant improvements, but no later than one year from completion of major construction activity. We make judgments as to the time period over which to capitalize such costs and these assumptions have a direct impact on net income because capitalized costs are not subtracted in calculating net income.

Liabilities
Upon the acquisition of real estate, we assess the fair value of acquired assets (including land, buildings and improvements, identified intangibles, such as acquired above and below-market leases, acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships) and acquired liabilities. We assess fair value based on estimated cash flow projections utilizing appropriate discount and capitalization rates and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including historical operating results, known trends, and market/economic conditions. Based on these estimates, we allocate the purchase price to the applicable assets and liabilities based on their relative fair values at date of acquisition.

In allocating the purchase price to identified intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired property, the value of above-market and below-market leases is estimated based on the present value of the difference between the contractual amounts, including fixed rate below-market renewal options, to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and our estimate of the market lease rates and other lease provisions for comparable leases measured over a period equal to the estimated remaining term of the lease. Tenant related intangibles and improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the related lease term, including any
27


bargain renewal options. We amortize identified intangibles that have finite lives over the period they are expected to contribute directly or indirectly to the future cash flows of the property or business acquired. We consider qualitative and quantitative factors in evaluating the likelihood of a tenant exercising a below market renewal option and include such renewal options in the calculation of in-place leases. If the value of below-market lease intangibles includes renewal option periods, we include such renewal periods in the amortization period utilized. If a lease terminates prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts relating to that lease are written off.
Since the assessment of fair value and allocation of these amounts is made at the time of acquisition, they are subject to future changes in market conditions and tenants’ ability to continue operations and their exercise of options and renewals. In the case that these assumptions change materially, they could have a material impact on our results and financial statements. During 2021, we acquired three properties and utilized the above factors, including the use of a third-party, to allocate the purchase price of these properties among various assets and liabilities. Further information on these allocations can be found in Part II, Item 8, Note 4 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We have had no changes to our methods of fair value assessment and allocations during the year ended December 31, 2021.

Real Estate - Estimates Related to Impairments
Our properties are individually reviewedevaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment exists when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the aggregate projected future cash flows over the anticipated holding period on an undiscounted basis taking into account the appropriate capitalization rate.rate in determining a future terminal value. An impairment loss is measured based on the excess of the property’s carrying amount over its estimated fair value. Estimated fair value may be based on discounted future cash flows utilizing appropriate discount and capitalization rates and, in addition to available market


information, third-party appraisals, broker selling estimates or sale agreements under negotiation. Impairment analyses are based on our current plans, intended holding periods and available market information at the time the analyses are prepared. If our estimates of the projected future cash flows orchange based on uncertain market conditions, change, our evaluation of impairment losses may be different and such differences could be material to our consolidated financial statements. The carrying value of a property may also be individually reassessed in the event a casualty occurs at that property. Casualty events may include property damage from a natural disaster or fire. When such an event occurs, management estimates the net book value of assets damaged over the property’s total gross leasable area and adjusts the property’s carrying value to reflect the damages. Estimates are subjective and may change if additional damage is later assessed or if future cash flows are revised.

Revenue Recognition WeDuring the year ended December 31, 2021, we have the following revenue sources and revenue recognition policies:

Rental revenue for fiscal periods prior to January 1, 2019: Rental revenue comprises revenue from property rentals and tenant expense reimbursements, as designated within tenant operating leases in accordance with ASC 840 Leases.
Property Rentals: We generate revenue from minimum lease payments from tenant operating leases. These rents are recognized over the noncancelable terms of the related leases on a straight-line basis which includes the effects of rent steps and rent abatements under the leases in accordance with ASC 840. We satisfy our performance obligations over time, under the noncancelable lease term, commencing when the tenant takes possession of the leased space and the leased space is substantially ready for its intended use. In addition, in circumstances where we provide a lease incentive to tenants, we recognize the incentive as a reduction of rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the lease. The underlying leased asset remains on our consolidated balance sheet and continues to depreciate. In addition to minimum lease payments, certain rental income derived from our tenant leases is contingent and dependent on percentage rent. Percentage rents are earned by the Company in the event the tenant's gross sales exceed certain amounts.
Tenant expense reimbursements:In accordance with ASC 840, revenue arises from tenant leases, which provide for the recovery of all or a portion of the operating expenses, real estate taxes and capital improvements of the respective property. This revenue is accrued in the period the expenses are incurred.
Rental revenue for fiscal periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019: Rental revenue comprises revenue from fixed and variable lease payments, as designated within tenant operating leases in accordance with ASC 842 Leases, as described further in ourLeases accounting policy in Note 3 to the audited consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Additionally, credit losses related to operating lease receivables are recognized as adjustments to rental revenue in accordance with ASC 842.
Credit losses related to operating lease receivables: We periodically evaluate the collectibility of amounts due from tenants and disputed enforceable charges, resulting from the inability of tenants to make required payments under their lease agreements. We recognizehad no changes in the collectibility assessment of these operating leases as adjustments to rental revenue.
Income from acquired leasehold interest: Income from acquired leasehold interest was revenue generated in connection with the write-off of an unamortized intangible liability balance related to the below-market ground lease as well as the balancemethods or assumptions used in our analyses of the straight-line receivable balance, upon acquisitionfair value of the leasehold interestour real estate assets and have not incurred any material impairment losses. We operate in a business that has significant investments in real estate and our estimates of the property.
Management and development fees: We generate management and development fee income from contractual property management agreements with third parties. This revenue is recognized as the services are transferred in accordance with ASC 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers.
Other Income: Other incomevaluation are subject to current market conditions and tenant operations, which drive future cash flows, and are beyond our control. As these factors can result in changes to our estimates and result in material impairment losses, this is generated in connection with certain services provided to tenants for which we earndeemed a fee. This revenue is recognized as the services are transferred in accordance with ASC 606.critical accounting estimate.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On June 1, 2017,January 11, 2021, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)SEC issued Auditing Standard 3101, The Auditor's ReportFinal Rule Release No. 33-10890, Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Selected Financial Data, and Supplementary Financial Information. This rule, which became effective on an AuditFebruary 10, 2021, adopts amendments to modernize, simplify and enhance certain financial disclosure requirements in Regulation S-K. Specifically, the amendments eliminate the requirement for Selected Financial Data, streamline the requirement to disclose Supplementary Financial Information, and amend Management’s Discussion & Analysis of Financial Statements WhenCondition and Results of Operations (‘‘MD&A’’). We early adopted the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion (“AS 3101”). As a result of AS 3101, the most significant changeamendments to the auditor’s report on the financial statements is a new requirement to describe critical audit matters arising from the audit of the current period’s financial statementstwo items resulting in the auditor’s report.elimination of Item 301, Selected Financial Data, and the omission of Item 302(a), Supplementary Financial Information. The requirements relatedamendments to critical audit mattersItem 303(a)(b) MD&A were adopted in AS 3101 were effective for audits of fiscal years ending on or after June 30, 2019, for large accelerated filers; and for fiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2020, for all other companies to which the requirements apply. Therefore, critical audit matters are included in the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Urban Edge Properties’ consolidated financial statements as of andour current Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, and will be included in the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Urban Edge Properties LP’s financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020.


2021.
See Note 3 to the audited consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information regarding recent accounting pronouncements that may affect us. Additionally, see Note 7 to the audited consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information regarding recent amendments to the Internal Revenue Code.






28


Results of Operations
We derive substantially all of our revenue from rents received from tenants under existing leases on each of our properties. This revenue includes fixed base rents, recoveries of expenses that we have incurred and that we pass through to the individual tenants and percentage rents that are based on specified percentages of tenants’ revenue, in each case as provided in the respective leases.
Our primary cash expenditures consist of our property operating and capital costs, general and administrative expenses, and interest and debt expense. Property operating expenses include: real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, management expenses, insurance and utilities; general and administrative expenses, which include payroll, professional fees, information technology, office expenses and other administrative expenses; and interest and debt expense primarily consistconsists of interest on our mortgage debt. In addition, we incur substantial non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization on our properties. We also capitalize certain expenses, such as taxes, interest and salaries related to properties under development or redevelopment until the property is ready for its intended use.
Our consolidated results of operations often are not comparable from period to period due to the impact of property acquisitions, dispositions, the timing and magnitude of bankruptcies by anchor tenants, developments, redevelopments and changes in accounting policies. The results of operations of any acquired properties are included in our financial statements as of the date of acquisition. Our results of operations are affected by national, regional and local economic conditions, as well as macroeconomic conditions, which are at times subject to volatility and uncertainty. The current COVID-19 pandemic has increased volatility and uncertainty and has created significant economic disruption in many markets. Vaccinations for the COVID-19 virus have been widely distributed among the general U.S. population, which has facilitated the loosening of restrictions previously mandated on our tenants identified as nonessential; however the potential emergence of vaccine-resistant variants of COVID-19 may trigger restrictions to be put back in place. Such restrictions may include mandatory business shut-downs, reduced business operations and social distancing requirements. The long-term consequences of the various restrictions taken during the pandemic on consumer behavior is currently unknown. Specifically, the revenue and sales volume for certain tenants identified as nonessential may decline significantly as demand for their services and products declines potentially longer term. We are actively managing our business to respond to the ongoing economic and social impact and uncertainty relating to the COVID-19 pandemic; however, our future near term and potentially longer term results of operations may be significantly adversely affected. See “Pandemic-Related Contingencies” under Liquidity and Capital Resources and “Item 1A. Risk Factors” for more information.
The following provides an overview of our key non-GAAP measures based on our consolidated results of operations (refer to cash NOI, same-property cash NOI and Funds From Operations applicable to diluted common shareholders (“FFO”) described later in this section):
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)2019 2018(Amounts in thousands)20212020
Net income$116,197
 $116,963
Net income$107,815 $97,750 
FFO applicable to diluted common shareholders(1)
167,123
 168,511
FFO applicable to diluted common shareholders(1)
180,270 156,326 
Cash NOI(2)
234,288
 226,965
Same-property cash NOI(2)
199,865
 203,621
NOI(2)
NOI(2)
223,811 200,383 
Same-property NOI(2)
Same-property NOI(2)
196,005 171,453 
(1) Refer to page 3533 for a reconciliation to the nearest generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) measure.
(2) Refer to page 3432 for a reconciliation to the nearest GAAP measure.



























29


Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 20192021 to December 31, 20182020
Net income for the year ended December 31, 20192021 was $116.2$107.8 million, compared to net income of $117.0$97.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.2020. The following table summarizes certain line items from our consolidated statements of income that we believe are important in understanding our operations and/or those items which significantly changed in the year ended December 31, 20192021 as compared to the same period of 2018:2020:
For the year Ended December 31,For the year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)2019 2018 $ Change(Amounts in thousands)20212020$ Change
Total revenue$387,649
 $414,160
 $(26,511)Total revenue$425,082 $330,095 $94,987 
Depreciation and amortization94,116
 99,422
 (5,306)
Real estate taxes60,179
 63,655
 (3,476)Real estate taxes63,844 60,049 $3,795 
Property operating expenses64,062
 78,360
 (14,298)Property operating expenses68,531 56,126 12,405 
General and administrative38,220
 34,984
 3,236
General and administrative39,152 48,682 (9,530)
Casualty and impairment loss, net12,738
 4,426
 8,312
Casualty and impairment loss, net468 3,055 (2,587)
Lease expense14,466
 11,448
 3,018
Gain on sale of real estate68,632
 52,625
 16,007
Gain on sale of real estate18,648 39,775 (21,127)
Gain on sale of lease1,849
 
 1,849
Interest income9,774
 8,336
 1,438
Interest income360 2,599 (2,239)
Interest and debt expense66,639
 64,868
 1,771
Interest and debt expense57,938 71,015 (13,077)
Gain on extinguishment of debt
 2,524
 (2,524)Gain on extinguishment of debt— 34,908 (34,908)
Income tax expense1,287
 3,519
 (2,232)
Income tax (benefit) expenseIncome tax (benefit) expense1,139 (38,996)40,135 
Total revenue decreasedincreased by $26.5$95.0 million to $387.6$425.1 million in the year ended December 31, 20192021 from $414.2$330.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2018.2020. The increase is primarily attributable to:
$44.7 million accelerated amortization of below-market intangible liabilities in connection with the termination of our Kmart and Sears leases, effective October 15, 2021;
$30.0 million decrease in rental revenue deemed uncollectible;
$11.3 million increase in straight-line rent driven by write-offs of receivables arising from the straight-lining of rents for tenants put on cash basis during 2020 compared to a reinstatement of straight-line balances, net of write-offs, during 2021;
$10.6 million increase as a result of property acquisitions net of dispositions; and
$0.2 million increase in management and development fee income and tenant bankruptcy settlement income; offset by
$1.8 million net decrease in property rentals and tenant reimbursements due to lease terminations and modifications, partially offset by rent commencements and contractual rent increases.
Real estate tax expense increased by $3.8 million to $63.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2021 from $60.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase is primarily attributable to:
$7.0 million increase as a result of property acquisitions net of dispositions; offset by
$2.2 million decrease as a result of successful tax appeals and lowered assessments; and
$1.0 million of real estate taxes capitalized in connection with redevelopment projects.
Property operating expenses increased by $12.4 million to $68.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2021 from $56.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase is primarily attributable to:
$6.7 million increase in common area maintenance expenses across the portfolio as a result of spend reductions and limited center hours due to COVID-19 interruptions during 2020; and
$5.7 million increase as a result of property acquisitions net of dispositions.
General and administrative expenses decreased by $9.5 million to $39.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2021 from $48.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2020. The decrease is primarily attributable to:
$15.47.2 million of executive transition costs including accelerated amortization of unvested equity awards recognized during 2020; and
$5.4 million decrease in amortization of below-market lease intangible liabilities due to lower write-offs in 2019transaction costs related to recaptured leases;the Puerto Rico legal entity restructuring and debt refinancing in 2020, offset by;
$12.3 million as a result of dispositions, net of acquisitions; and
$1.4 million due to credit losses related to operating lease receivables recognized against rental income in 2019 in accordance with the new lease accounting standard, effective January 1, 2019, as compared to being included in property operating expenses in 2018, partially offset by
$1.03.1 million increase in property rentals due to rent commencements, lease modificationspayroll, transaction, severance, and contractual rent increases;other expenses.
$1.0 million increase due to rent abatements in 2018,We recognized at our two malls in Puerto Ricoa casualty and at our property in Wilkes-Barre, PA as a resultimpairment loss, net of natural disasters; and
$0.6 million increase in third-party management and development fee income due to higher leasing commissions.
Depreciation and amortization decreased by $5.3 million to $94.1$0.5 million, in the year ended December 31, 2019 from $99.42021 attributable to real estate impairment charges recognized against the carrying value of one property and one ground lease, each of which were disposed of during the year. We recognized a casualty and impairment loss, net of $3.1 million, in the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease is primarily2020 attributable to:
$7.1 million decrease in depreciation and amortization asto a result of lower write-offs of existing tenant improvements and intangible assets related to recaptured leases; and
$2.1 million decrease as a result of property dispositions, net of acquisitions, partially offset by
$3.9 million increase from completed development projects and tenant improvements.
Real estate taxes decreased by $3.5 million to $60.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2019 from $63.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease is primarily attributable to:
$2.0 million decrease as a result of dispositions, net of acquisitions; and
$1.5 million decrease due to successful appeals and tax refunds.
Property operating expenses decreased by $14.3 million to $64.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2019 from $78.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease is primarily attributable to:
$15.5 million of lease termination payments to acquire the Toys “R” Us leases at Bruckner Commons in the Bronx, NY and Hudson Mall in Jersey City, NJ in 2018;
$4.1 million due to credit losses related to operating lease receivables recognized in property operating expenses in 2018 versus rental revenue in 2019; and
$1.5 million decrease as a result of dispositions, net of acquisitions, partially offset by


$3.3 million increase in common area maintenance projects and repair costs for vacant spaces;
$2.7 million of common area maintenance expenses recognized on a gross basis at tenant-maintained centers in accordance with the new lease accounting standard; and
$0.8 million increase in accrued environmental remediation costs.
General and administrative expenses increased by $3.2 million to $38.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2019 from $35.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase is primarily attributable to:
$3.4 million increase in share-based compensation expense due to additional equity awards granted; and
$1.7 million increase in professional fees for consulting, recruitment and legal services, partially offset by
$1.0 million decrease due to the recognition of office rent within lease expense in accordance with the lease accounting standard, effective January 1, 2019; and
$0.9 million net decrease in executive transition costs, severance and other expenses.
Casualty and impairment losses increased by $8.3 million to $12.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2019 from $4.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase is primarily attributable to:
$20.7 million higher real estate impairment lossescharge recognized in 2019, partially offset byagainst the carrying value of one property.
$12.4 million higher proceeds from insurance settlements, net of casualty expenses, for Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico in 2017 and for tornado damage at our shopping center in Wilkes-Barre, PA in June 2018.
30

Lease expense increased by $3.0 million to $14.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2019 from $11.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase is primarily attributable to the recognition of office rent and common area maintenance and real estate taxes associated with ground or building leases within lease expense in accordance with the new lease accounting standard, effective January 1, 2019.

We recognized a gain on sale of real estate of $68.6$18.6 million in the year ended December 31, 20192021 due to the sale of eightthree operating properties. Aproperties and one property parcel. We recognized a gain on sale of real estate of $52.6$39.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2020 due to the sale of three operating properties.
Interest income decreased by $2.2 million to $0.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2021 from $2.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2020. The decrease is primarily attributable to a lower cash balance and a decrease in interest rates.
Interest and debt expense decreased by $13.1 million to $57.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2021 from $71.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2020. The decrease is primarily attributable to:
$8.1 million decrease due to the troubled debt restructuring on our mortgage at Las Catalinas Mall in Puerto Rico in December 2020, subsequent to which we recognized interest payments as a reduction of the carrying value of the loan and not as interest expense;
$2.0 million decrease due to the $250 million draw on the Company’s revolving credit agreement in March 2020, with the borrowings fully repaid in November 2020;
$1.3 million increase in capitalized interest due to the activation of redevelopment projects during 2021;
$0.9 million decrease in interest on variable-rate debt due to lower interest rates; and
$0.8 million decrease as a result of the refinancing of the mortgage secured by The Outlets at Montehiedra in June 2020.
We recognized a gain on extinguishment of debt of $34.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2020 as a result of the refinancing of the mortgage secured by The Outlets at Montehiedra, consisting of the forgiveness of the $30 million junior loan plus accrued interest of $5.4 million, offset by the write-off of $0.4 million of unamortized deferred financing fees and $0.1 million of transaction costs.
Income tax expense of $1.1 million was recognized in the year ended December 31, 2018 comprised of $50.42021 compared to a $39.0 million as a result of the sale of our property in Allentown, PA on April 26, 2018 and $2.2 million as a result of the sale of a 5.7 acre land parcel on July 5, 2018 at our property, Cherry Hill Commons, in Cherry Hill, NJ.
We recognized a gain of $1.8 milliontax benefit in the year ended December 31, 2019 due2020. The increase is primarily attributable to the saletax impact of the mortgage refinancing and legal entity restructuring transactions related to our ground leasemalls in Tysons Corner, VA.Puerto Rico in 2020, partially offset by state and local income tax expense resulting from tax strategies implemented to limit the impact from the cancellation of debt at The Outlets at Montehiedra on the Company’s U.S. federal taxable income.
Interest income increased by $1.4 million
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2020 to $9.8 million inDecember 31, 2019
Discussions of 2019 items and comparisons between the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, from $8.3 millionrespectively, that are not included in this Report can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. The increase is attributable to an increase in interest rates and higher invested cash balances.2020.
Interest and debt expense increased by $1.8 million to $66.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2019 from $64.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase is primarily attributable to:
$1.8 million decrease in capitalized interest due to the completion of development projects; and
$0.4 million increase resulting from higher interest rates on variable rate debt, partially offset by
$0.4 million decrease due to lower principal balances from monthly payments on fixed rate debt.
We recognized a $2.5 million gain on extinguishment of debt in the year ended December 31, 2018 as a result of the foreclosure sale and forgiveness of the $11.5 million mortgage debt secured by our property in Englewood, NJ.
Income tax expense decreased by $2.2 million to $1.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2019 from $3.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease is primarily attributable to:
$1.2 million decrease from the tax impact of Hurricane Maria and the related insurance settlements received in 2019 for our two malls in Puerto Rico;
$0.8 million decrease due to lower operating income at our Puerto Rico properties; and
$0.2 million decrease resulting from lower TRS activities.














Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We use NOI internally to make investment and capital allocation decisions and to compare the unlevered performance of our properties to our peers. Further, we believe NOI is useful to investors as a performance measure because, when compared across periods, NOI reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs and acquisition and disposition activity on an unleveraged basis, providing perspective not immediately apparent from net income. The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to NOI is net income. NOI excludes certain components from net income in order to provide results that are more closely related to a property’s results of operations. We calculate NOI by adjusting net income to add back depreciation and amortization expense, general and administrative expenses, casualty and real estate impairment losses, interest and debt expense, income tax expense and non-cash lease expense, and deduct management and development fee income from non-owned properties, gains on sale of real estate, interest income, non-cash rental income resulting from the straight-lining of rents and amortization of acquired below market leases net of above market leases. NOI should not be considered a substitute for net income and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by others.

We calculate same-property NOI using net income as defined by GAAP reflecting only those income and expense items that are reflected in NOI (as described above) and excluding properties that were under development, redevelopment or that involve anchor repositioning where a substantial portion of the gross leasable area is taken out of service, and also excluding properties acquired or sold during the periods being compared. We also exclude for the following items in calculating same-property NOI: lease termination fees, bankruptcy settlement income, and income and expenses that we do not believe are representative of ongoing operating results, if any. As such, same-property NOI assists in eliminating disparities in net income due to the development, redevelopment, acquisition or disposition of properties during the periods presented, and thus provides a more consistent performance measure for the comparison of the operating performance of the Company’s properties, which the Company believes to be useful to investors. Same-property NOI should not be considered a substitute for net income and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by others.
31


Throughout this section, we have provided certain information on a “same-property” cash basis which includes the results of operations that were owned and operated for the entirety of the reporting periods being compared, totaling 70which total 66 properties for the years ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018.2020. Information provided on a same-property basis excludes properties that were under development, redevelopment or that involve anchor repositioning where a substantial portion of the gross leasable area is taken out of service and also excludes properties acquired or sold during the periods being compared. While there is judgment surrounding changes in designations, a property is removed from the same-property pool when a property is considered to be a redevelopment property because it is undergoing significant renovation or retenanting pursuant to a formal plan and is expected to have a significant impact on property operating income based on the retenanting that is occurring. A development or redevelopment property is moved back to the same-property pool once a substantial portion of the NOI growth expected from the development or redevelopment is reflected in both the current and comparable prior year period, generally one year after at least 80% of the expected NOI from the project is realized on a cash basis. Acquisitions are moved into the same-property pool once we have owned the property for the entirety of the comparable periods and the property is not under significant development or redevelopment.

We calculate same-property cash NOI using net income as defined by GAAP reflecting only those income and expense items that are reflected in cash NOI, adjusted for the following items: lease termination fees, bankruptcy settlement income and income and expenses that we do not believe are representative of ongoing operating results, if any.

The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to cash NOI is net income. Cash NOI excludes certain components from net income in order to provide results that are more closely related to a property’s results of operations. We calculate cash NOI by adjusting net income to add back depreciation and amortization expense, general and administrative expenses, casualty and real estate impairment losses and non-cash lease expense, and deduct non-cash rental income resulting from the straight-lining of rents and amortization of acquired below market leases net of above market leases.

We use cash NOI internally to make investment and capital allocation decisions and to compare the unlevered performance of our properties to our peers. Further, we believe cash NOI is useful to investors as a performance measure because, when compared across periods, cash NOI reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs and acquisition and disposition activity on an unleveraged basis, providing perspective not immediately apparent from net income. As such, cash NOI assists in eliminating disparities in net income due to the development, redevelopment, acquisition or disposition of properties during the periods presented, and thus provides a more consistent performance measure for the comparison of the operating performance of the Company’s properties. Cash NOI and same-property cash NOI should not be considered substitutes for net income and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by others.
Same-property cash NOI decreasedincreased by $3.8$24.6 million, or (1.8)%14.3%, for the year ended December 31, 20192021 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018.2020. Same-property NOI results for the year ended December 31, 2020 were negatively impacted by rental revenue deemed uncollectible primarily due to the COVID-19 pandemic.























The following table reconciles net income to cash NOI and same-property cash NOI for the years ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018.2020.
For the year ended December 31,For the year ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)2019 2018(Amounts in thousands)20212020
Net income$116,197
 $116,963
Net income$107,815 $97,750 
Management and development fee income from non-owned properties(1,900) (1,469)Management and development fee income from non-owned properties(1,169)(1,283)
Other expense (income)1,065
 (146)
Other expenseOther expense608 672 
Depreciation and amortization94,116
 99,422
Depreciation and amortization92,331 96,029 
General and administrative expense38,220
 34,984
General and administrative expense39,152 48,682 
Casualty and impairment loss, net(1)
12,738
 4,426
Real estate impairment lossReal estate impairment loss468 3,055 
Gain on sale of real estate(68,632) (52,625)Gain on sale of real estate(18,648)(39,775)
Gain on sale of lease(1,849) 
Interest income(9,774) (8,336)Interest income(360)(2,599)
Interest and debt expense66,639
 64,868
Interest and debt expense57,938 71,015 
Gain on extinguishment of debt
 (2,524)Gain on extinguishment of debt— (34,908)
Income tax expense1,287
 3,519
Income tax (benefit) expenseIncome tax (benefit) expense1,139 (38,996)
Non-cash revenue and expenses(13,819) (32,117)Non-cash revenue and expenses(55,463)741 
Cash NOI234,288
 226,965
NOINOI223,811 200,383 
Adjustments:   Adjustments:
Non-same property cash NOI(2)
(34,137) (38,731)
Non-same property NOI and other(1)
Non-same property NOI and other(1)
(26,493)(27,836)
Tenant bankruptcy settlement income and lease termination income(1,643) (1,028)Tenant bankruptcy settlement income and lease termination income(1,313)(1,094)
Environmental remediation costs1,357
 584
Construction rental abatement
 291
Lease termination payment
 15,500
Natural disaster related operating loss
 40
Same-property cash NOI$199,865
 $203,621
Same-property NOISame-property NOI$196,005 $171,453 
Adjustments:   Adjustments:
Cash NOI related to properties being redeveloped23,049
 20,431
Same-property cash NOI including properties in redevelopment$222,914
 $224,052
NOI related to properties being redevelopedNOI related to properties being redeveloped20,915 18,621 
Same-property NOI including properties in redevelopmentSame-property NOI including properties in redevelopment$216,920 $190,074 
(1) The year ended December 31, 2019 reflects real estate impairment losses, offset by insurance proceeds for Hurricane Maria at our two malls in Puerto Rico and for tornado damage at our shopping center in Wilkes-Barre, PA. The year ended December 31, 2018 reflects hurricane-related insurance proceeds net of expenses.
(2) Non-same property cash NOI includes cash NOI related to properties being redeveloped and properties acquired or disposed.disposed in the period. Amounts for 2021 include Sunrise Mall which generated a net loss of $3.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. These amounts reflect the total loss on the property and include the portion pertaining to the noncontrolling interest in Sunrise Mall.






32










Funds From Operations
FFO applicable to diluted common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 20192021 was $167.1$180.3 million compared to $168.5$156.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.2020.

We calculate FFO in accordance with the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts’ (‘‘Nareit’’) definition. Nareit defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable real estate and land when connected to the main business of a REIT, impairments on depreciable real estate or land related to a REIT's main business, and rental property depreciation and amortization expense. We believe FFO is a meaningful non-GAAP financial measure useful in comparing our levered operating performance from period to period both internally and among our peers because this non-GAAP measure excludes net gains on sales of depreciable real estate, real estate impairment losses, rental property depreciation and amortization expense which implicitly assumes that the value of real estate diminishes predictably over time rather than fluctuating based on market conditions. We believe the presentation of comparable period operating results generated from FFO provides useful information to investors because the definition excludes items included in net income that do not relate to, or are not, indicative of our operating and financial performance, such as depreciation and amortization related to real estate, and items which can make periodic and peer analyses of operating and financial performance more difficult, such as gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable real estate and land when connected to the main business of a REIT and impairments on depreciable real estate or land related to a REIT's main business. FFO does not represent cash flows from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance, and is not indicative of cash flow as a measure of liquidity or our ability to make cash distributions. FFO may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by others.
The following table reflects the reconciliation of net income to FFO for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
For the year ended December 31,For the year ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)2019 2018(Amounts in thousands)20212020
Net income$116,197
 $116,963
Net income$107,815 $97,750 
Less net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in:   Less net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in:
Operating partnership(6,699) (11,768)Operating partnership(4,296)(4,160)
Consolidated subsidiaries25
 (45)Consolidated subsidiaries(833)(1)
Net income attributable to common shareholders109,523
 105,150
Net income attributable to common shareholders102,686 93,589 
Adjustments:   Adjustments:
Rental property depreciation and amortization93,212
 98,644
Rental property depreciation and amortization91,468 95,297 
Gain on sale of real estate(68,632) (52,625)Gain on sale of real estate(18,648)(39,775)
Real estate impairment loss26,321
 5,574
Real estate impairment loss468 3,055 
Limited partnership interests in operating partnership(1)
6,699
 11,768
Limited partnership interests in operating partnership(1)
4,296 4,160 
FFO applicable to diluted common shareholders$167,123
 $168,511
FFO applicable to diluted common shareholders$180,270 $156,326 
(1) Represents earnings allocated to Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) and OPOperating Partnership (“OP”) unitholders for unissued common shares, which have been excluded for purposes of calculating earnings per diluted share for the periods presented.presented because they are anti-dilutive.





35
33




Liquidity and Capital Resources

Due to the nature of our business, we typically generate significant amounts of cash from operations; however, the cash generated from operations is primarily paid to our shareholders and unitholders of the Operating Partnership in the form of distributions. Our status as a REIT requires that we generally distribute at least 90% of our REITREIT’s ordinary taxable income each year. OurOur Board of Trustees declared a quarterly dividend of $0.22$0.15 per common share and OP Unitunit for each of the four quarters in 2019,2021, or an annual rate of $0.88. We expect to pay$0.60. Historically, we have paid regular cash dividends,dividends; however, the timing, declaration, amount and payment of distributions to shareholders and unitholders of the Operating Partnership fallsfall within the discretion of our Board of Trustees. Our Board of Trustees’ decisions regarding the payment of dividends dependsdepend on many factors, such as maintaining our REIT tax status, our financial condition, earnings, capital requirements, debt service obligations, limitations under our financing arrangements, industry practice, legal requirements, regulatory constraints, and other factors.

Property rental income is our primary source of cash flow and is dependent on a number of factors, including our occupancy level and rental rates, as well as our tenants’ ability to pay rent. Our properties providehave historically provided us with a relatively consistent stream of cash flow that enables us to pay operating expenses, debt service and recurring capital expenditures. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic had an adverse impact on our short-term cash flow by affecting our tenants’ ability to pay rent, however, our collection rates have returned to pre-pandemic levels and we have collected 98% of base rents billed during the year ended December 31, 2021. Other sources of liquidity to fund cash requirements include proceeds from financings, equity offerings and asset sales. Additionally, we have a $600 million revolving credit agreement with certain financial institutions which has a maturity date of January 29, 2024 and includes two six-month extension options. See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our short-term liquiditycash requirements consist of normal recurring operating expenses, lease obligations, regular debt service requirements, recurring expenditures (generalgeneral & administrative expenses),expenses, expenditures related to leasing activity and distributions to shareholders and unitholders of the Operating Partnership. Our long-term capital requirements consist primarily of maturities under our long-term debt agreements, development and redevelopment costs and potential acquisitions.

At December 31, 2019,2021, we had cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash, of $485.1219.8 million and no amounts drawn on our $600 millionrevolving credit agreement. In addition, the Company has the following sources of capital available:
 Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)2019
Revolving credit agreement(1)
 
Total commitment amount$600,000
Available capacity$600,000
MaturityJanuary 29, 2024
(1)
Refer to Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We have no debt scheduled to mature in 2020. We currently believe that cash flows from operations over the next 12 months, together with cash on hand, our revolving credit agreement and our general ability to access the capital markets will be sufficient to finance our operations and fund our debt service requirements and capital expenditures.

Summary of Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash, was $485.1$219.8 million at December 31, 2019,2021, compared to $457.5$419.3 million as of December 31, 2018, an increase2020, a decrease of $27.6$199.4 million.

Our cash flow activities are summarized as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)20212020
Net cash provided by operating activities$135,273 $112,822 
Net cash used in investing activities(311,160)(98,460)
Net cash used in financing activities(23,530)(80,245)
 Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)2019 2018 2017
Net cash provided by operating activities$156,400
 $137,040
 $157,898
Net cash used in investing activities(2,521) (64,803) (295,732)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(126,265) (115,556) 498,489

Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities primarily consists of cash inflows from rental revenue and cash outflows for property operating expenses, general and administrative expenses and interest and debt expense.
Net cash provided by operating activities of $156.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019,2021 increased by $19.4 million from $137.0$22.5 million as ofcompared to December 31, 2018. The increase was driven by $15.5 million of lease termination payments to acquire the Toys “R” Us leases at Bruckner Commons in the Bronx, NY and Hudson Mall in Jersey City, NJ during the year ended


December 31, 2018, partially offset by a decrease in cash2020, due to timingthe improved collection rates on property rentals and tenant expense reimbursements in 2021 and collection of cash receiptspreviously billed and payments related to tenant collections including the impact of recovery income.deferred amounts from 2020.

Investing Activities
Net cash flow used in investing activities is impacted by the timing and extent of our real estate development, capital improvements, and acquisition and disposition activities during the period.
Net cash used in investing activities of $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, increased by $62.3$212.7 million compared to net cash used in investing activities of $64.8 million as of December 31, 20182020 due to a (i) $58.9$128.3 million increase in cash provided by the sale of properties,used for acquisitions, (ii) $27.5$66.9 million decreaseincrease in cash used for real estate development and capital improvements, at existing properties,and (iii) $11.4$17.5 million increasedecrease in cash from insurance proceedsprovided by the sale of properties and operating leases.
34


The Company has 21 active development, redevelopment or anchor repositioning projects with total estimated costs of $218.7 million, of which $72.1 million has been incurred and $146.6 million remains to be funded as of December 31, 2021.
The following summarizes capital expenditures presented on a cash basis for physical property damages received in the yearyears ended December 31, 2019,2021 and (iv) $6.92020:
Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)20212020
Capital expenditures:
Development and redevelopment costs$76,750 $15,468 
Capital improvements14,944 10,704 
Tenant improvements and allowances3,683 2,350 
Total capital expenditures$95,377 $28,522 
Development and redevelopment costs includes $20 million increase dueincurred by the Company to terminate its three remaining leases with Kmart and Sears at Bruckner Commons, The Outlets at Montehiedra, and Sunrise Mall, effective October 15, 2021. Controlling these anchor spaces is a critical aspect of the plans the Company has under way to reposition and redevelop these spaces with uses that appeal to the sale of an operating lease, partially offset by (v) $42.4 million increase in cash used for acquisitions.respective communities where the properties are located.

Financing Activities
Net cash flow used in or provided by financing activities is impacted by the timing and extent of issuances of debt and equity securities, distributions paid to common shareholders and unitholders of the Operating Partnership as well as principal and other payments associated with our outstanding indebtedness.
Net cash used in financing activities of $126.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, increased2021, decreased by $10.7$56.7 million from $115.6 million for the year ended December 31, 20182020 due to (i) $6.0$71.1 million paiddecrease in debt repayments primarily related to redeem unitsthe mortgage refinancing on our Puerto Rico property in 2019,2020, (ii) $2.6$54.1 million of cash usedpaid to amend our revolving credit agreementrepurchase common shares in 2019,2020, (iii) $1.3$27.0 million increase in proceeds from borrowings under mortgage loans, (iv) $3.5 million decrease in cash used to issue debt, repayments, (iv) $0.5(v) $1.2 million increase in distributions to shareholders and unitholders and (v) $0.2 million increasedecrease in tax withholdings on vested restricted stock.stock, and (vi) $0.8 million increase in cash contributed by noncontrolling interests, offset by (vii) $101.0 million increase in distributions paid to partners due to the temporary suspension of dividends during 2020 and the declaration of a special dividend in the fourth quarter of 2020, paid in January 2021.
Financing ActivitiesOn May 5, 2021 we established an at-the-market equity program (the “ATM Program”), pursuant to which we may offer and Contractual Obligations
Below is a summarysell common shares, par value $0.01 per share, with an aggregate gross sales price of our outstanding debt and weighted average interest rate as of December 31, 2019.
(Amounts in thousands) Principal balance at December 31, 2019 Weighted Average Interest Rate at December 31, 2019
Mortgages payable:    
Fixed rate debt $1,386,748
 4.12%
Variable rate debt(1)
 169,500
 3.45%
Total mortgages payable 1,556,248
 4.04%
Unamortized debt issuance costs (10,053)  
Total mortgages payable, net of unamortized debt issuance costs $1,546,195
  
(1)up to $250 million. As of December 31, 2019, $80.5 million of our variable rate debt bears interest at one month LIBOR plus 190 bps and $89.0 million bears interest at one month LIBOR plus 160 bps.

The net carrying amount of real estate collateralizing the above indebtedness amounted to approximately $1.2 billion as of December 31, 2019. Our mortgage loans contain covenants that limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness on these properties and in certain circumstances, require lender approval of tenant leases, certain redevelopment projects and/or yield maintenance upon repayment prior to maturity. As of December 31, 2019,2021, we were in compliance with all debt covenants.

On January 15, 2015, we entered into a $500 million Revolving Credit Agreement (the “Agreement”) with certain financial institutions. On March 7, 2017, we amended and extended the Agreement. The amendment increased the credit facility size by $100 million to $600 million and extended the maturity date to March 7, 2021 with two six-month extension options. On July 29, 2019, we entered into a second amendment to the Agreement to extend the maturity date to January 29, 2024 with two six-month extension options. Company borrowingshave not issued any common shares under the Agreement are subjectATM Program. Refer to interest at LIBOR plus 1.05% to 1.50%Part II, Item 8 Equity and an annual facility fee of 15 to 30 basis points. Both the spread over LIBOR and the facility fee are based on our current leverage ratio and are subject to increase if our leverage ratio increases above predefined thresholds. The Agreement contains customary financial covenants including a maximum leverage ratio of 60% and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.5x. No amounts have been drawn to date under the Agreement.

In the event that LIBOR is discontinued, the interest ratesNoncontrolling Interest for our debt following such event will be based on either alternate base rates or agreed upon replacement rates. We do not believe that such an event would affect our ability to borrow or maintain already outstanding borrowings, although it could result in higher interest rates.



During 2017, our property in Englewood, NJ was transferred to a receiver. On January 31, 2018, the property was sold at a foreclosure sale and on February 23, 2018, the court order was received approving the sale and discharging the receiver of all assets and liabilitiesmore information related to the property. We recognized a gain on extinguishment of debt of $2.5 million as a result of the forgiveness of outstanding mortgage debt of $11.5 million, which is included in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2018.this program.

Contractual Obligations
We have contractual obligations related to our mortgage loans described further in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, we have contractual obligations for certain properties that are subject to long-term ground and building leases where a third party owns and has leased the underlying land to us. We also have non-cancelable operating leases pertaining to office space from which we conduct our business. Below is a summary of our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2019:
  Commitments Due by Period
(Amounts in thousands) Total Less than 1 year 1 to 3 years 3 to 5 years More than 5 years
Contractual cash obligations          
Long-term debt obligations(1)
 $1,918,134
 $70,599
 $343,358
 $702,977
 $801,200
Operating lease obligations 112,603
 9,235
 17,313
 16,936
 69,119
Finance lease obligations 7,078
 109
 218
 218
 6,533
  $2,037,815
 $79,943
 $360,889
 $720,131
 $876,852
2021:

Commitments Due by Period
(Amounts in thousands)TotalLess than 1 year1 to 3 years3 to 5 yearsMore than 5 years
Contractual cash obligations
Long-term debt obligations(1)
$1,981,997 $155,249 $602,943 $345,191 $878,614 
Operating lease obligations(2)
89,351 9,089 16,437 12,416 51,409 
Finance lease obligations(2)
6,859 109 218 233 6,299 
$2,078,207 $164,447 $619,598 $357,840 $936,322 
(1) Includes interest and principal payments. Interest on variable rate debt is computed using rates in effect as of December 31, 2019.2021. See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.
(2) See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.


35


Additional contractual obligations that have been excluded from this table are as follows:
Obligations related to construction and development contracts, since amounts are not fixed or determinable. Such contracts will generally be due over the next two years;
Obligations related to maintenance contracts, since these contracts typically can be canceled upon 30 to 60 days’ notice without penalty;
Obligations related to employment contracts with certain executive officers, since all agreements are subject to cancellation by either the Company or the executive without cause upon notice; and
Recorded debt premiums or discounts that are not obligations.

Capital Expenditures
The following summarizes capital expenditures presented on a cash basis for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
  Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands) 2019 2018
Capital expenditures:    
Development and redevelopment costs(1)
 $72,331
 $91,330
Capital improvements 14,252
 20,577
Tenant improvements and allowances 4,718
 5,079
Total capital expenditures $91,301
 $116,986
(1)Amounts for the year ended December 31, 2018 have been reclassified to conform with current period presentation.
As of December 31, 2019, we had approximately $65.6 million of active redevelopment, development and anchor repositioning projects at various stages of completion, a decrease of $130.9 millionWe believe that cash flows from $196.5 million of projects as of December 31, 2018. We have advanced these projects and incurred $20.3 million of additional spend since December 31, 2018. We anticipate that these projects will require an additional $29.9 million over the next two years to complete. We expect to fund these projects usingour current operations, cash on hand, proceeds from dispositions, using secured debt or issuing equity.

Commitments and Contingencies
Insurance
The Company maintains (i) general liability insurance with limitsour line of $200 million for properties incredit under our revolving credit agreement, the U.S. and Puerto Rico and (ii) all-risk property insurance with limits of $500 million per occurrence and in the aggregate for properties in the U.S. and $139 million for properties in Puerto Rico, subjectpotential to the terms, conditions, exclusions, deductibles and sub-limits when applicable for


certain perils such as floods and earthquakes and (iii) numerous other insurance policies including trustees’ and officers’ insurance, workers’ compensation and automobile-related liabilities insurance. The Company’s insurance includes coverage for acts of terrorism but excludes coverage for nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological terrorism events as defined by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act, which expires in December 2020. In addition, the Company maintains coverage for certain cybersecurity losses providing first and third-party coverage including network interruption, event management, cyber extortion and claims for media content, security and privacy liability. Insurance premiums are typically charged directly to each of the retail properties and warehouses but not all of the cost of such premiums are recovered. The Company is responsible for deductibles, losses in excess of insurance coverage, and the portion of premiums not reimbursable by tenants at our properties, which could be material.
We continue to monitor the state of the insurance market and the scope and costs of available coverage. We cannot anticipate what coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in the future and expect premiums across most coverage lines to increase in light of recent events. The incurrence of uninsured losses, costs or uncovered premiums could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Certain ofrefinance our loans and other agreements contain customary covenants requiringour general ability to access the maintenance of insurance coverage. Although we believe that we currently have adequate insurance coverage for purposes of these agreements, we may notcapital markets will be able to obtain an equivalent amount of coverage at reasonable costs in the future. If lenders or other counterparties insist on greater coverage than we are able to obtain, such requirement could materially and adversely affect our abilitysufficient to finance our propertiesoperations and expandfund our portfolio.obligations in both the short-term and long-term.

Hurricane-Related Charges
On September 20, 2017, Hurricane Maria made landfall, damaging our two properties in Puerto Rico. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company incurred a $2.2 million charge reflecting the net book value of assets damaged and incurred $1.7 million of hurricane-related expenses, included in casualty and impairment loss, net on the accompanying consolidated statements of income. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recognized $2.2 million of business interruption losses, net of $1.8 million in cash advances received from its insurance carrier. Losses of $0.9 million pertained to rent abatements when the malls were closed or inoperable as a result of the hurricane, recorded as a reduction of rental revenue, and $1.3 million was recorded within property operating expenses to provision for doubtful accounts for unpaid rents.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company received $1.5 million in casualty insurance proceeds, which were partially offset by $0.3 million of hurricane-related costs, resulting in net casualty gains of $1.2 million included in casualty and impairment loss, net on the accompanying consolidated statements of income. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recognized $0.3 million of business interruption losses, comprised of $0.7 million of rent abatements due to tenants that had not reopened since the hurricane, recorded as a reduction of rental revenue, offset by a $0.4 million reversal within property operating expenses to provision for doubtful accounts for payments received from tenants on rents previously reserved.

In June 2019, the Company finalized its insurance recovery related to Hurricane Maria with its carrier at $14.3 million, of which $3.3 million was previously received, subject to deductibles of $2.3 million. We recognized an $8.7 million casualty gain during the year ended December 31, 2019 as a result of the remaining insurance proceeds from the settlement agreement for our two malls in Puerto Rico.

Environmental Matters
Each of our properties has been subjected to varying degrees of environmental assessment at various times. Based on these assessments, we have accrued costs of $2.7 million and $1.7 million on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, for remediation costs for environmental contamination at certain properties. While this accrual reflects third-party estimates of the potential costs of remediation at these properties, there can be no assurance that the actual costs will not exceed these amounts. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company recognized $1.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of environmental remediation costs included in property operating expenses on the consolidated statements of income. Although we are not aware of any other material environmental contamination, there can be no assurance that the identification of new areas of contamination, changes in the extent or known scope of contamination, the discovery of additional sites, or changes in cleanup requirements would not result in significant costs to us.

Bankruptcies
Although our rental revenue is supported by long-term leases, leases may be rejected in a bankruptcy proceeding and the related tenant stores may permanently vacate prior to lease expiration. In the event a tenant with a significant number of leases or square footage in our shopping centers files for bankruptcy and rejects its leases with us, we could experience a reduction in our revenues. We monitor the operating performance and rent collections of all tenants in our shopping centers, especially those tenants in arrears


or operating retail formats that are experiencing significant changes in competition, business practice, or store closings in other locations.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, tenants including Toys “R” Us, Sears, Fallas, and National Wholesale Liquidators filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

During September 2017, Toys “R” Us filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code and announced an orderly wind-down of its U.S. business and liquidation of all U.S. stores on March 15, 2018. Prior to the liquidation, the Company had leases with Toys “R” Us at nine locations with annual rental revenue of $7.6 million. In connection with the Toys “R” Us bankruptcy, the Company recognized a write-off of $21.6 million of below-market intangible liabilities (classified within rental revenue), $15.5 million of lease termination payments (classified within property operating expense) and a $1.0 million write-off of reserves on receivables from straight-line rents in the year ended December 31, 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company received $1.2 million of bankruptcy settlement income in connection with the bankruptcy proceedings of Toys "R" Us. The settlement proceeds were used to offset outstanding credit losses and the remaining proceeds were recorded to other income. No determination has been made as to the amount or timing of additional bankruptcy settlement proceeds, if any, that may be received.

Fallas filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on August 6, 2018. Prior to the tenant vacating, the Company had one lease with Fallas at the Shops at Bruckner in the Bronx, NY comprising approximately 38,000 sf which generated $1.4 million in annual rental revenue. In connection with the bankruptcy, the Company recognized a write-off of $0.8 million of below-market intangible liabilities (classified within rental revenue) in the year ended December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had executed a lease with LA Fitness for this space.

Sears filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on October 15, 2018. The Company had four Kmart leases with Sears comprising approximately 547,000 sf, which generated $8.5 million in annual rental revenue. Property rents were paid on all four Kmart locations through April 2019. In April 2019, our Kmart leases at Las Catalinas and Huntington, NY were rejected and we recognized a $7.4 million write-off of the below-market intangible liability connected with the lease in Huntington, NY (classified within rental revenues). ESL Investments (“ESL”) assumed the Company’s remaining two Kmart leases at Montehiedra and at Bruckner Commons in 2018. In January 2020 the Company executed a lease with ShopRite for its former Kmart space in Huntington, NY.

National Wholesale Liquidators filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on October 24, 2018. The Company had one lease with National Wholesale Liquidators in Lodi, NJ comprising approximately 171,000 sf, which generated $3.1 million in annual rental revenue. This lease was rejected and returned to us on November 30, 2018. In connection with the bankruptcy, the Company recorded a $0.8 million write-off of reserves on receivables from straight-line rents in the year ended December 31, 2018. The Company is in active negotiations to lease this property.

Inflation and Economic Condition Considerations
Most of our leases contain provisions designed to partially mitigate the impact of inflation. Although inflation has been low in recent periods and has had a minimal impact on the performance of our shopping centers, it is very possible that inflation will increase in future years. Most of our leases require tenants to pay their share of operating expenses, including common area maintenance, real estate taxes and insurance, thereby reducing our exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation, although some larger tenants have capped the amount of these operating expenses they are responsible for under the lease. A small number of our leases also include percentage rent clauses enabling us to receive additional rent based on tenant sales above a predetermined level, which sales generally increase as prices rise and are typically related to increases in the Consumer Price Index or similar inflation indices.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2019 or December 31, 2018.


40



ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest Rate Risk

We have exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, which are sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control. The following table discusses our exposure to hypothetical changes in market rates of interest on interest expense for our variable rate debt and fixed-rate debt. Interest rate risk amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our debt. This analysis does not take into account all of the factors that may affect our debt, such as the effect that a changing interest rate environment could have on the overall level of economic activity or the action that our management might take to reduce our exposure to the change. This analysis assumes no change in our financial structure. Our exposure to a change in interest rates is summarized in the table below. As of December 31, 2019,2021, all of our variable rate debt outstanding had rates indexed to LIBOR.
2019 201820212020
(Amounts in thousands)December 31, Balance Weighted Average Interest Rate Effect of 1% Change in Base Rates December 31, Balance Weighted Average Interest Rate(Amounts in thousands)December 31, BalanceWeighted Average Interest RateEffect of 1% Change in Base RatesDecember 31, BalanceWeighted Average Interest Rate
 
Variable Rate$169,500
 3.45% $1,695
 $169,500
 4.09%Variable Rate$161,084 1.85%$1,611 $169,371 1.90%
Fixed Rate1,386,748
 4.12% 
(2) 
1,392,659
 4.12%Fixed Rate1,534,324 4.10%— (2)1,428,026 4.16%
$1,556,248
(1) 
 $1,695
 $1,562,159
(1) 
 $1,695,408 (1)$1,611 $1,597,397 (1)
(1) Excludes unamortized debt issuance costs of $10.1$8.2 million and $11.9$9.9 million as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, respectively.
(2) If the weighted average interest rate of our fixed rate debt increased by 1% (i.e. due to refinancing at higher rates), annualized interest expense would increase by approximately $13.9$15.3 million based on outstanding balances as of December 31, 2019.2021.

We may utilize various financial instruments to mitigate the impact of interest rate fluctuations on our cash flows and earnings, including hedging strategies, depending on our analysis of the interest rate environment and the costs and risks of such strategies. As of December 31, 2019,2021, we did not have any material hedging instruments in place.

Fair Value of Debt

The estimated fair value of our consolidated debt is calculated based on current market prices and discounted cash flows at the current rate at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings for the remaining term of such debt. As of December 31, 2019,2021, the estimated fair value of our consolidated debt was $1.6$1.7 billion.


Other Market Risks
As of December 31, 2021, we had no material exposure to any other market risks (including foreign currency exchange risk or commodity price risk).
In making this determination and for purposes of the SEC’s market risk disclosure requirements, we have estimated the fair value of our financial instruments at December 31, 2021 based on pertinent information available to management as of that date. Although management is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the estimated amounts as of December 31, 2021, future estimates of fair value and the amounts which may be paid or realized in the future may differ significantly from amounts presented.


41
36



ITEM 8.
ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA


INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Page
Page
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Urban Edge Properties (PCAOB ID No. 34)
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Urban Edge Properties LP (PCAOB ID No. 34)
Urban Edge Properties Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20192021 and 20182020
Urban Edge Properties Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019
Urban Edge Properties Consolidated StatementStatements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019
Urban Edge Properties Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019
Urban Edge Properties LP Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20192021 and 20182020
Urban Edge Properties LP Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019
Urban Edge Properties LP Consolidated StatementStatements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019
Urban Edge Properties LP Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation



42
37




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of Urban Edge Properties

Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Urban Edge Properties and subsidiaries (the “Company”"Company") as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018, and2020, the related consolidated statements of income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20192021, and the related notes and schedules listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”"financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2021, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2021, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 12, 2020,16, 2022, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’sCompany's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’sCompany's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the USU.S. federalsecurities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditto obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit mattermatters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Real Estate Impairment - Refer—Refer to Notes 2, 3 and 9 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company’s real estate assets are individually evaluated for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company’s evaluation of the recoverability of real estate assets involves the comparison of the projected undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by each real estate asset over the Company’s estimated holding period to the respective carrying amount. The Company’s undiscounted future cash flow analyses require management to make significant estimates, and assumptions related toincluding estimated terminal values determined using appropriate capitalization rates.
In the event that a real estate asset is not recoverable, the Company will adjust the real estate asset to its fair value based on discounted future cash flows, third-party appraisals, broker selling estimates, and sale agreements under negotiation, and recognize an impairment loss for the carrying amount in excess of fair value. The Company’s discounted future cash flow analyses require management to make significant estimates and assumptions related to capitalization rates and discount rates. Total real estate assets as of December 31, 20192021 had a net book value of $2.1$2.4 billion. Total impairment losses recorded in 2019 were $26.3 million.
Given that the Company’s estimated capitalization rates used in the evaluation of impairment of real estate assets requiresis a significant assumption made by management, to make significant estimates and assumptions related to capitalization rates and discount rates, performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of


management’s undiscounted future cash flows analyses and discounted future cash flow analyses required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased level of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialists.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the determination ofCompany’s estimated capitalization rates and discount ratesused in the evaluation of impairment of real estate assets included the following, among others:
We tested the design and operating effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over management’s evaluation of the recoverability of real estate, assets and determination of the impairment charge, including internal controls over management’s determination of the reasonableness of the applicable capitalization rates.
38


Inquired with management regarding the appropriateness of the capitalization rates, including considerations related to the impact of COVID-19 and discount rates.evaluating the consistency of the capitalization rates used with evidence obtained in other areas of our audit.
With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we evaluated the reasonableness of the Company’s fair value determination, including estimates ofestimated capitalization rates and discount rates by:
Testing the source information underlying the determination of the capitalization rates and discount rates by evaluating the reasonableness of the capitalization rates and discount rates used by management with independent market data, focusing on key factors, such asincluding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, geographical location, tenant composition, and property type.
Developing a range of independent estimates of capitalization rates and comparing those to the capitalization rates and discount rates selected by management.
Evaluating the mathematical accuracy of the cash flow analyses.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

New York, New York
February 12, 202016, 2022
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.





44
39




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Partners of Urban Edge Properties LP

Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Urban Edge Properties LP (the “Operating Partnership”"Operating Partnership") as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20192021, and the related notes and schedules listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”"financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2021, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Operating Partnership’sPartnership's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2021, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 12, 202016, 2022, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Operating Partnership’sPartnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Operating Partnership’sPartnership's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Operating Partnership in accordance with the USU.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Real Estate Impairment —Refer to Notes 2, 3 and 9 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Operating Partnership's real estate assets are individually evaluated for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Operating Partnership's evaluation of the recoverability of real estate assets involves the comparison of the projected undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by each real estate asset over the Operating Partnership's estimated holding period to the respective carrying amount. The Operating Partnership's undiscounted future cash flow analyses require management to make significant estimates, including estimated terminal values determined using appropriate capitalization rates. Total real estate assets as of December 31, 2021 had a net book value of $2.4 billion.
Given that the Operating Partnership's estimated capitalization rates used in the evaluation of impairment of real estate assets is a significant assumption made by management, performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management’s undiscounted future cash flow analyses required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased level of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialists.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the Operating Partnership's estimated capitalization rates used in the evaluation of impairment of real estate assets included the following, among others:
40


We tested the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership's internal controls over management’s evaluation of the recoverability of real estate, including internal controls over management’s determination of the reasonableness of the applicable capitalization rates.
Inquired with management regarding the appropriateness of the capitalization rates, including considerations related to the impact of COVID-19 and evaluating the consistency of the capitalization rates used with evidence obtained in other areas of our audit.
With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we evaluated the reasonableness of the Operating Partnership's estimated capitalization rates by:
Testing the source information underlying the determination of the capitalization rates by evaluating the reasonableness of the capitalization rates used by management with independent market data, focusing on key factors, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, geographical location, tenant composition, and property type.
Developing a range of independent estimates of capitalization rates and comparing those to the capitalization rates selected by management.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

New York, New York
February 12, 202016, 2022
We have served as the Operating Partnership’s auditor since 2016.
































45
41




URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 December 31,December 31,
 20212020
ASSETS 
Real estate, at cost:  
Land$543,827 $568,662 
Buildings and improvements2,441,797 2,326,450 
Construction in progress212,296 44,689 
Furniture, fixtures and equipment7,530 7,016 
Total3,205,450 2,946,817 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(753,947)(730,366)
Real estate, net2,451,503 2,216,451 
Operating lease right-of-use assets69,361 80,997 
Cash and cash equivalents164,478 384,572 
Restricted cash55,358 34,681 
Tenant and other receivables15,812 15,673 
Receivables arising from the straight-lining of rents62,692 62,106 
Identified intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $37,361 and $37,009, respectively71,107 56,184 
Deferred leasing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $17,641 and $16,419, respectively20,694 18,585 
Prepaid expenses and other assets74,111 70,311 
Total assets$2,985,116 $2,939,560 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY  
Liabilities:
Mortgages payable, net$1,687,190 $1,587,532 
Operating lease liabilities64,578 74,972 
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities84,829 132,980 
Identified intangible liabilities, net of accumulated amortization of $35,029 and $71,375, respectively100,625 148,183 
Total liabilities1,937,222 1,943,667 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)00
Shareholders’ equity:
Common shares: $0.01 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized and 117,147,986 and 117,014,317 shares issued and outstanding, respectively1,170 1,169 
Additional paid-in capital1,001,253 989,863 
Accumulated deficit(7,091)(39,467)
Noncontrolling interests:
Operating partnership39,616 38,456 
Consolidated subsidiaries12,946 5,872 
Total equity1,047,894 995,893 
Total liabilities and equity$2,985,116 $2,939,560 
 December 31, December 31,
 2019 2018
ASSETS   
Real estate, at cost: 
  
Land$515,621
 $525,819
Buildings and improvements2,197,076
 2,156,113
Construction in progress28,522
 80,385
Furniture, fixtures and equipment7,566
 6,675
Total2,748,785
 2,768,992
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(671,946) (645,872)
Real estate, net2,076,839
 2,123,120
Operating lease right-of-use assets81,768
 
Cash and cash equivalents432,954
 440,430
Restricted cash52,182
 17,092
Tenant and other receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $6,486 as of December 31, 201821,565
 28,563
Receivable arising from the straight-lining of rents, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $134 as of December 31, 201873,878
 84,903
Identified intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $30,942 and $39,526, respectively48,121
 68,422
Deferred leasing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $16,560 and $16,826, respectively21,474
 21,277
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $3,765 and $2,764, respectively3,877
 2,219
Prepaid expenses and other assets33,700
 12,968
Total assets$2,846,358
 $2,798,994
    
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 
  
Liabilities:   
Mortgages payable, net$1,546,195
 $1,550,242
Operating lease liabilities79,913
 
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities76,644
 98,517
Identified intangible liabilities, net of accumulated amortization of $62,610 and $65,058, respectively128,830
 144,258
Total liabilities1,831,582
 1,793,017
Commitments and contingencies


 


Shareholders’ equity:   
Common shares: $0.01 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized and 121,370,125 and 114,345,565 shares issued and outstanding, respectively1,213
 1,143
Additional paid-in capital1,019,149
 956,420
Accumulated deficit(52,546) (52,857)
Noncontrolling interests:   
Operating partnership46,536
 100,822
Consolidated subsidiaries424
 449
Total equity1,014,776
 1,005,977
Total liabilities and equity$2,846,358
 $2,798,994

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

42
46




URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
 
Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
2019 2018 2017 202120202019
REVENUE     REVENUE
Rental revenue$384,405
 $411,298
 $365,082
Rental revenue$422,467 $328,280 $384,405 
Management and development fees1,900
 1,469
 1,535
Management and development fees1,169 1,283 1,900 
Income from acquired leasehold interest
 
 39,215
Other income1,344
 1,393
 1,210
Other income1,446 532 1,344 
Total revenue387,649
 414,160
 407,042
Total revenue425,082 330,095 387,649 
EXPENSES     EXPENSES
Depreciation and amortization94,116
 99,422
 82,281
Depreciation and amortization92,331 96,029 94,116 
Real estate taxes60,179
 63,655
 59,737
Real estate taxes63,844 60,049 60,179 
Property operating64,062
 78,360
 54,339
Property operating68,531 56,126 64,062 
General and administrative38,220
 34,984
 30,691
General and administrative39,152 48,682 38,220 
Casualty and impairment loss, net(1)
12,738
 4,426
 7,382
Casualty and impairment loss, net(1)
468 3,055 12,738 
Lease expense14,466
 11,448
 10,848
Lease expense12,872 13,667 14,466 
Total expenses283,781
 292,295
 245,278
Total expenses277,198 277,608 283,781 
Gain on sale of real estate68,632
 52,625
 202
Gain on sale of real estate18,648 39,775 68,632 
Gain on sale of lease1,849
 
 
Gain on sale of lease— — 1,849 
Interest income9,774
 8,336
 2,248
Interest income360 2,599 9,774 
Interest and debt expense(66,639) (64,868) (56,218)Interest and debt expense(57,938)(71,015)(66,639)
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt
 2,524
 (35,336)
Gain on extinguishment of debtGain on extinguishment of debt— 34,908 — 
Income before income taxes117,484
 120,482
 72,660
Income before income taxes108,954 58,754 117,484 
Income tax (expense) benefit(1,287) (3,519) 278
Income tax (expense) benefit(1,139)38,996 (1,287)
Net income116,197
 116,963
 72,938
Net income107,815 97,750 116,197 
Less net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in:Less net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in:    Less net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in:
Operating partnership(6,699) (11,768) (5,824)Operating partnership(4,296)(4,160)(6,699)
Consolidated subsidiaries25
 (45) (44)Consolidated subsidiaries(833)(1)25 
Net income attributable to common shareholders$109,523
 $105,150
 $67,070
Net income attributable to common shareholders$102,686 $93,589 $109,523 
     
Earnings per common share - Basic:$0.91
 $0.92
 $0.62
Earnings per common share - Basic:$0.88 $0.79 $0.91 
Earnings per common share - Diluted:$0.91
 $0.92
 $0.61
Earnings per common share - Diluted:$0.88 $0.79 $0.91 
Weighted average shares outstanding - Basic119,751
 113,863
 107,132
Weighted average shares outstanding - Basic117,029 117,722 119,751 
Weighted average shares outstanding - Diluted119,896
 114,051
 118,390
Weighted average shares outstanding - Diluted121,447 117,902 119,896 
(1) Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.



47
43




URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSTATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Common SharesNoncontrolling Interests (“NCI”)
 SharesAmountAdditional
Paid-In Capital
Accumulated Earnings
(Deficit)
Operating PartnershipConsolidated SubsidiariesTotal Equity
Balance, January 1, 2019114,345,565$1,143 $956,420 $(52,857)$100,822 $449 $1,005,977 
Net income attributable to common shareholders— — — 109,523 — — 109,523 
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests— — — — 6,699 (25)6,674 
Impact of ASC 842 adoption— — — (2,918)— — (2,918)
Limited partnership interests:
Units redeemed for common shares6,995,941 69 55,788 — (4,279)— 51,578 
Units redeemed for cash— — (3,422)— (2,556)— (5,978)
Reallocation of noncontrolling interests— — 4,521 — (56,099)— (51,578)
Common shares issued59,895 569 (131)— — 439 
Dividends to common shareholders ($0.88 per share)— — — (106,163)— — (106,163)
Distributions to redeemable NCI ($0.88 per unit)— — — — (5,694)— (5,694)
Share-based compensation expense— — 5,906 — 7,643 — 13,549 
Share-based awards retained for taxes(31,276)— (633)— — — (633)
Balance, December 31, 2019121,370,1251,213 1,019,149 (52,546)46,536 424 1,014,776 
Net income attributable to common shareholders— — — 93,589 — — 93,589 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests— — — — 4,160 4,161 
Limited partnership interests:
Units redeemed for common shares1,579,389 15 11,129 — — — 11,144 
Reallocation of noncontrolling interests— — 8,833 — (19,977)— (11,144)
Common shares issued66,588 427 (30)— — 398 
Repurchase of common shares(5,873,923)(59)(54,082)— — — (54,141)
Dividends to common shareholders ($0.68 per share)— — — (80,480)— — (80,480)
Distributions to redeemable NCI ($0.68 per unit)— — — — (3,386)— (3,386)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests— — — — — 5,447 5,447 
Share-based compensation expense— — 5,871 — 11,123 — 16,994 
Share-based awards retained for taxes(127,862)(1)(1,464)— — — (1,465)
Balance, December 31, 2020117,014,317$1,169 $989,863 $(39,467)$38,456 $5,872 $995,893 
Net income attributable to common shareholders— — — 102,686 — — 102,686 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests— — — — 4,296 833 5,129 
Limited partnership interests:
Units redeemed for common shares100,000 — 840 — (6,302)— (5,462)
Reallocation of noncontrolling interests— — 8,206 — (2,744)— 5,462 
Common shares issued46,731 509 (144)— — 366 
Dividends to common shareholders ($0.60 per share)— — — (70,166)— — (70,166)
Distributions to redeemable NCI ($0.60 per unit)— — — — (2,864)— (2,864)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests— — — — — 6,241 6,241 
Share-based compensation expense— — 2,045 — 8,774 — 10,819 
Share-based awards retained for taxes(13,062)— (210)— — — (210)
Balance, December 31, 2021117,147,986$1,170 $1,001,253 $(7,091)$39,616 $12,946 $1,047,894 
 Common Shares     Noncontrolling Interests (“NCI”)  
 Shares Amount
 
Additional
Paid-In Capital
 
Accumulated Earnings
(Deficit)
 Operating Partnership Consolidated Subsidiaries Total Equity
Balance, January 1, 201799,754,900
 $997
 $488,375
 $(29,066) $35,451
 $360
 $496,117
Net income attributable to common shareholders
 
 
 67,070
 
 
 67,070
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 5,824
 44
 5,868
Limited partnership units issued
 
 105,200
 
 65,884
 
 171,084
Common shares issued14,083,137
 141
 348,582
 (319) 
 
 348,404
Dividends on common shares ($0.88 per share)
 
 
 (95,381) 
 
 (95,381)
Distributions to redeemable NCI ($0.88 per unit)
 
 
 
 (9,471) 
 (9,471)
Share-based compensation expense
 
 4,532
 75
 2,530
 
 7,137
Share-based awards retained for taxes(10,508) 
 (287) 
 
 
 (287)
Balance, December 31, 2017113,827,529

1,138

946,402

(57,621)
100,218

404

990,541
Net income attributable to common shareholders
 
 
 105,150
 
 
 105,150
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 11,768
 45
 11,813
Limited partnership interests:             
Units redeemed for common shares429,110
 4
 3,500
 
 
 
 3,504
Reallocation of noncontrolling interests
 
 1,263
 
 (4,767) 
 (3,504)
Common shares issued106,116
 2
 647
 (172) 
 
 477
Dividends to common shareholders ($0.88 per share)
 
 
 (100,244) 
 
 (100,244)
Distributions to redeemable NCI ($0.88 per unit)
 
 
 
 (11,116) 
 (11,116)
Share-based compensation expense
 
 4,992
 30
 4,719
 
 9,741
Share-based awards retained for taxes(17,190) (1) (384) 
 
 
 (385)
Balance, December 31, 2018114,345,565
 1,143
 956,420
 (52,857) 100,822
 449
 1,005,977
Net income attributable to common shareholders
 
 
 109,523
 
 
 109,523
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 6,699
 (25) 6,674
Impact of ASC 842 adoption
 
 
 (2,918) 
 
 (2,918)
Limited partnership interests:             
Units redeemed for common shares6,995,941
 69
 55,788
 
 (4,279) 
 51,578
Units redeemed for cash
 
 (3,422) 
 (2,556) 
 (5,978)
Reallocation of noncontrolling interests
 
 4,521
 
 (56,099) 
 (51,578)
Common shares issued59,895
 1
 569
 (131) 
 
 439
Dividends to common shareholders ($0.88 per share)
 
 
 (106,163) 
 
 (106,163)
Distributions to redeemable NCI ($0.88 per unit)
 
 
 
 (5,694) 
 (5,694)
Share-based compensation expense
 
 5,906
 
 7,643
 
 13,549
Share-based awards retained for taxes(31,276) 
 (633) 
 
 
 (633)
Balance, December 31, 2019121,370,125
 $1,213
 $1,019,149
 $(52,546) $46,536
 $424
 $1,014,776

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

44
48




URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
 Year Ended December 31,
 202120202019
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES  
Net income$107,815 $97,750 $116,197 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:   
Depreciation and amortization94,135 97,751 96,641 
Casualty and impairment loss, net468 3,055 12,738 
Gain on sale of real estate(18,648)(39,775)(68,632)
Gain on sale of lease— — (1,849)
Gain on extinguishment of debt— (34,908)— 
Amortization of below market leases, net(55,173)(10,624)(15,940)
Noncash lease expense6,802 7,522 8,205 
Straight-lining of rent(878)10,523 1,021 
Share-based compensation expense10,819 16,994 13,549 
Change in operating assets and liabilities:  
Tenant and other receivables(139)5,892 8,119 
Deferred leasing costs(5,818)(1,218)(4,303)
Prepaid and other assets5,661 (41,982)(3,331)
Lease liabilities(6,227)(6,680)(7,107)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities(3,544)8,522 1,092 
Net cash provided by operating activities135,273 112,822 156,400 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES  
Real estate development and capital improvements(95,377)(28,522)(91,301)
Acquisitions of real estate(252,632)(124,340)(47,356)
Proceeds from sale of operating properties34,482 54,402 116,510 
Proceeds from sale of operating lease2,367 — 6,949 
Insurance proceeds— — 12,677 
Net cash used in investing activities(311,160)(98,460)(2,521)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES  
Debt repayments(18,192)(89,302)(5,587)
Dividends paid to common shareholders(123,998)(26,647)(106,163)
Distributions paid to redeemable noncontrolling interests(4,937)(1,314)(5,694)
Taxes withheld for vested restricted shares(210)(1,465)(633)
Debt issuance costs— (3,471)(2,649)
Payment for redemption of units— — (5,978)
Proceeds related to the issuance of common shares366 398 439 
Cash paid to repurchase shares— (54,141)— 
Contributions from noncontrolling interests6,241 5,447 — 
Proceeds from borrowings117,200 90,250 — 
Net cash used in financing activities(23,530)(80,245)(126,265)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash(199,417)(65,883)27,614 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year419,253 485,136 457,522 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$219,836 $419,253 $485,136 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
Net income$116,197
 $116,963
 $72,938
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: 
  
  
Depreciation and amortization93,785
 100,063
 82,511
Income from acquired leasehold interest
 
 (39,215)
Casualty and impairment loss, net12,738
 5,574
 5,637
Gain on sale of real estate(68,632) (52,625) (202)
Gain on sale of lease(1,849) 
 
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt
 (2,524) 35,336
Amortization of deferred financing costs2,856
 2,879
 2,876
Amortization of below market leases, net(15,940) (33,975) (9,502)
Noncash lease expense8,205
 
 
Straight-lining of rent1,021
 (735) 352
Share-based compensation expense13,549
 9,741
 7,137
Credit losses related to operating lease receivables1,385
 4,138
 3,445
Change in operating assets and liabilities: 
  
  
Tenant and other receivables6,734
 (13,327) (13,749)
Deferred leasing costs(4,303) (4,675) (4,110)
Prepaid and other assets(3,331) 1,867
 (4,432)
Lease liabilities(7,107) 
 
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities1,092
 3,676
 18,876
Net cash provided by operating activities156,400
 137,040
 157,898
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
Real estate development and capital improvements(91,301) (118,765) (89,344)
Acquisition of real estate(47,356) (4,931) (211,393)
Proceeds from sale of operating properties116,510
 57,593
 5,005
Proceeds from sale of operating lease6,949
 
 
Insurance proceeds12,677
 1,300
 
Net cash used in investing activities(2,521) (64,803) (295,732)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
Debt repayments(5,587) (4,288) (129,640)
Dividends to common shareholders(106,163) (100,244) (95,381)
Distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interests(5,694) (11,116) (9,471)
Taxes withheld for vested restricted shares(633) (385) (287)
Debt issuance costs(2,649) 
 (13,193)
Payment for redemption of units(5,978) 
 
Proceeds related to the issuance of common shares439
 477
 348,404
Payment on extinguishment of debt
 
 (1,138)
Purchase of marketable securities in connection with debt defeasance
 
 (536,505)
Proceeds from borrowings
 
 935,700
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(126,265) (115,556)
498,489
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash27,614
 (43,319) 360,655
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year457,522
 500,841
 140,186
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$485,136
 $457,522
 $500,841



See notes to consolidated financial statements


45


Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2019 2018 2017202120202019
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATIONSUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION    SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION 
Cash payments for interest net of amounts capitalized of $1,425, $3,313 and $3,926, respectively$64,751
 $65,699
 $55,140
Cash payments for interest net of amounts capitalized of $2,023, $715 and $1,425, respectivelyCash payments for interest net of amounts capitalized of $2,023, $715 and $1,425, respectively$58,621 $68,113 $64,751 
Cash payments for income taxes1,601
 757
 1,237
Cash payments for income taxes4,663 499 1,601 
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES     NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Accrued capital expenditures included in accounts payable and accrued expenses5,056
 25,661
 14,651
Accrued capital expenditures included in accounts payable and accrued expenses18,702 5,808 5,056 
Write-off of fully depreciated assets56,199
 24,307
 3,286
Mortgage debt forgiven in foreclosure
 11,537
 
Acquisition of real estate through issuance of OP units
 
 171,084
Acquisition of real estate through assumption of debt
 
 69,659
Marketable securities transferred in connection with debt defeasance
 
 536,590
Defeasance of mortgages payable
 
 (505,473)
Write-off of fully depreciated and impaired assetsWrite-off of fully depreciated and impaired assets10,706 21,447 56,199 
Forgiveness of mortgage debtForgiveness of mortgage debt— 30,000 — 
Assumption of debt from the acquisition of real estateAssumption of debt from the acquisition of real estate— 72,473 — 
Dividend/distribution declared and paid in subsequent periodDividend/distribution declared and paid in subsequent period— 55,905 — 
RECONCILIATION OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASHRECONCILIATION OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH  RECONCILIATION OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year$440,430
 $490,279
 $131,654
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year$384,572 $432,954 $440,430 
Restricted cash at beginning of year17,092
 10,562
 8,532
Restricted cash at beginning of year34,681 52,182 17,092 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year$457,522
 $500,841
 $140,186
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year$419,253 $485,136 $457,522 
     
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$432,954
 $440,430
 $490,279
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$164,478 $384,572 $432,954 
Restricted cash at end of year52,182
 17,092
 10,562
Restricted cash at end of year55,358 34,681 52,182 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$485,136
 $457,522
 $500,841
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$219,836 $419,253 $485,136 

 See notes to consolidated financial statements.


50
46




URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES LP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except unit and per unit amounts)
 December 31, December 31,
 2019 2018
ASSETS   
Real estate, at cost: 
  
Land$515,621
 $525,819
Buildings and improvements2,197,076
 2,156,113
Construction in progress28,522
 80,385
Furniture, fixtures and equipment7,566
 6,675
Total2,748,785
 2,768,992
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(671,946) (645,872)
Real estate, net2,076,839
 2,123,120
Operating lease right-of-use assets81,768
 
Cash and cash equivalents432,954
 440,430
Restricted cash52,182
 17,092
Tenant and other receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $6,486 as of December 31, 201821,565
 28,563
Receivable arising from the straight-lining of rents, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $134 as of December 31, 201873,878
 84,903
Identified intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $30,942 and $39,526, respectively48,121
 68,422
Deferred leasing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $16,560 and $16,826, respectively21,474
 21,277
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $3,765 and $2,764, respectively3,877
 2,219
Prepaid expenses and other assets33,700
 12,968
Total assets$2,846,358
 $2,798,994
    
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 
  
Liabilities:   
Mortgages payable, net$1,546,195
 $1,550,242
Operating lease liabilities79,913
 
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities76,644
 98,517
Identified intangible liabilities, net of accumulated amortization of $62,610 and $65,058, respectively128,830
 144,258
Total liabilities1,831,582
 1,793,017
Commitments and contingencies


 


Equity:   
Partners’ capital:   
General partner: 121,370,125 and 114,345,565 units outstanding, respectively1,020,362
 957,563
Limited partners: 5,833,318 and 12,736,633 units outstanding, respectively50,156
 105,447
Accumulated deficit(56,166) (57,482)
Total partners’ capital1,014,352
 1,005,528
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries424
 449
Total equity1,014,776
 1,005,977
Total liabilities and equity$2,846,358
 $2,798,994
 December 31,December 31,
 20212020
ASSETS 
Real estate, at cost:  
Land$543,827 $568,662 
Buildings and improvements2,441,797 2,326,450 
Construction in progress212,296 44,689 
Furniture, fixtures and equipment7,530 7,016 
Total3,205,450 2,946,817 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(753,947)(730,366)
Real estate, net2,451,503 2,216,451 
Operating lease right-of-use assets69,361 80,997 
Cash and cash equivalents164,478 384,572 
Restricted cash55,358 34,681 
Tenant and other receivables15,812 15,673 
Receivables arising from the straight-lining of rents62,692 62,106 
Identified intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $37,361 and $37,009, respectively71,107 56,184 
Deferred leasing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $17,641 and $16,419, respectively20,694 18,585 
Prepaid expenses and other assets74,111 70,311 
Total assets$2,985,116 $2,939,560 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY  
Liabilities:
Mortgages payable, net$1,687,190 $1,587,532 
Operating lease liabilities64,578 74,972 
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities84,829 132,980 
Identified intangible liabilities, net of accumulated amortization of $35,029 and $71,375, respectively100,625 148,183 
Total liabilities1,937,222 1,943,667 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)00
Equity:
Partners’ capital:
General partner: 117,147,986 and 117,014,317 units outstanding, respectively1,002,423 991,032 
Limited partners: 4,662,654 and 4,729,010 units outstanding, respectively41,030 41,302 
Accumulated deficit(8,505)(42,313)
Total partners’ capital1,034,948 990,021 
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries12,946 5,872 
Total equity1,047,894 995,893 
Total liabilities and equity$2,985,116 $2,939,560 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.



51
47




URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except unit and per unit amounts)
Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
2019 2018 2017 202120202019
REVENUE     REVENUE
Rental revenue$384,405
 $411,298
 $365,082
Rental revenue$422,467 $328,280 $384,405 
Management and development fees1,900
 1,469
 1,535
Management and development fees1,169 1,283 1,900 
Income from acquired leasehold interest
 
 39,215
Other income1,344
 1,393
 1,210
Other income1,446 532 1,344 
Total revenue387,649
 414,160
 407,042
Total revenue425,082 330,095 387,649 
EXPENSES     EXPENSES
Depreciation and amortization94,116
 99,422
 82,281
Depreciation and amortization92,331 96,029 94,116 
Real estate taxes60,179
 63,655
 59,737
Real estate taxes63,844 60,049 60,179 
Property operating64,062
 78,360
 54,339
Property operating68,531 56,126 64,062 
General and administrative38,220
 34,984
 30,691
General and administrative39,152 48,682 38,220 
Casualty and impairment loss, net(1)
12,738
 4,426
 7,382
Casualty and impairment loss, net(1)
468 3,055 12,738 
Lease expense14,466
 11,448
 10,848
Lease expense12,872 13,667 14,466 
Total expenses283,781
 292,295
 245,278
Total expenses277,198 277,608 283,781 
Gain on sale of real estate68,632
 52,625
 202
Gain on sale of real estate18,648 39,775 68,632 
Gain on sale of lease1,849
 
 
Gain on sale of lease— — 1,849 
Interest income9,774
 8,336
 2,248
Interest income360 2,599 9,774 
Interest and debt expense(66,639) (64,868) (56,218)Interest and debt expense(57,938)(71,015)(66,639)
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt
 2,524
 (35,336)
Gain on extinguishment of debtGain on extinguishment of debt— 34,908 — 
Income before income taxes117,484
 120,482
 72,660
Income before income taxes108,954 58,754 117,484 
Income tax (expense) benefit(1,287) (3,519) 278
Income tax (expense) benefit(1,139)38,996 (1,287)
Net income116,197
 116,963
 72,938
Net income107,815 97,750 116,197 
Less: net (income) loss attributable to NCI in consolidated subsidiaries25
 (45) (44)Less: net (income) loss attributable to NCI in consolidated subsidiaries(833)(1)25 
Net income attributable to unitholders$116,222
 $116,918
 $72,894
Net income attributable to unitholders$106,982 $97,749 $116,222 
     
Earnings per unit - Basic:$0.92
 $0.92
 $0.62
Earnings per unit - Basic:$0.88 $0.80 $0.92 
Earnings per unit - Diluted:$0.92
 $0.92
 $0.61
Earnings per unit - Diluted:$0.88 $0.80 $0.92 
Weighted average units outstanding - Basic126,333
 126,198
 117,779
Weighted average units outstanding - Basic120,966 121,957 126,333 
Weighted average units outstanding - Diluted126,478
 126,386
 118,390
Weighted average units outstanding - Diluted122,107 122,811 126,478 
 (1) Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.




52
48




URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSTATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(In thousands, except unit and per unit amounts)
Total SharesGeneral Partner Total Units
Limited Partners(1)
Accumulated Earnings
(Deficit)
NCI in Consolidated SubsidiariesTotal Equity
Total Shares General Partner  Total Units 
Limited Partners(1)
 Accumulated Earnings
(Deficit)
 NCI in Consolidated Subsidiaries Total Equity
Balance, January 1, 201799,754,900
 $489,372
 6,378,704
 $37,081
 $(30,696) $360
 $496,117
Net income attributable to unitholders
 
 
 
 72,894
 
 72,894
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 44
 44
Common units issued as a result of common shares issued by Urban Edge14,083,137
 348,723
 
 
 (319) 
 348,404
Limited partnership units issued, net
 105,200
 6,434,250
 65,884
 
 
 171,084
Distributions to Partners ($0.88 per unit)
 
 
 
 (104,852) 
 (104,852)
Share-based compensation expense
 4,532
 
 2,530
 75
 
 7,137
Share-based awards retained for taxes(10,508) (287) 
 
 
 
 (287)
Balance, December 31, 2017113,827,529
 947,540
 12,812,954
 105,495
 (62,898) 404
 990,541
Net income attributable to unitholders
 
 
 
 116,918
 
 116,918
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 45
 45
Common units issued as a result of common shares issued by Urban Edge106,116
 649
 
 
 (172) 
 477
Equity redemption of OP Units429,110
 3,504
 (429,110) 
 
 
 3,504
Limited partnership units issued, net
 
 352,789
 
 
 
 
Reallocation of noncontrolling interests
 1,263
 
 (4,767) 
 
 (3,504)
Distributions to Partners ($0.88 per unit)
 
 
 
 (111,360) 
 (111,360)
Share-based compensation expense
 4,992
 
 4,719
 30
 
 9,741
Share-based awards retained for taxes(17,190) (385) 
 
 
 
 (385)
Balance, December 31, 2018114,345,565
 957,563
 12,736,633
 105,447
 (57,482) 449
 1,005,977
Balance, January 1, 2019Balance, January 1, 2019114,345,565 $957,563 12,736,633 $105,447 $(57,482)$449 $1,005,977 
Net income attributable to unitholders
 
 
 
 116,222
 
 116,222
Net income attributable to unitholders— — — — 116,222 — 116,222 
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 (25) (25)Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests— — — — — (25)(25)
Impact of ASC 842 adoption
 
 
 
 (2,918) 
 (2,918)Impact of ASC 842 adoption— — — — (2,918)— (2,918)
Common units issued as a result of common shares issued by Urban Edge59,895
 570
 
 
 (131) 
 439
Common units issued as a result of common shares issued by Urban Edge59,895 570 — — (131)— 439 
Equity redemption of OP Units6,995,941
 55,857
 (6,995,941) (4,279) 
 
 51,578
Equity redemption of OP Units6,995,941 55,857 (6,995,941)(4,279)— — 51,578 
Equity redemption for cash
 (3,422) (357,998) (2,556) 
 
 (5,978)Equity redemption for cash— (3,422)(357,998)(2,556)— — (5,978)
Limited partnership units issued, net
 
 450,624
 
 
 
 
Limited partnership units issued, net— — 450,624 — — — — 
Reallocation of noncontrolling interests
 4,521
 
 (56,099) 
 
 (51,578)Reallocation of noncontrolling interests— 4,521 — (56,099)— — (51,578)
Distributions to Partners ($0.88 per unit)
 
 
 
 (111,857) 
 (111,857)Distributions to Partners ($0.88 per unit)— — — — (111,857)— (111,857)
Share-based compensation expense
 5,906
 
 7,643
 
 
 13,549
Share-based compensation expense— 5,906 — 7,643 — — 13,549 
Share-based awards retained for taxes(31,276) (633) 
 
 
 
 (633)Share-based awards retained for taxes(31,276)(633)— — — — (633)
Balance, December 31, 2019121,370,125
 $1,020,362
 5,833,318
 $50,156
 $(56,166) $424
 $1,014,776
Balance, December 31, 2019121,370,125 1,020,362 5,833,318 50,156 (56,166)424 1,014,776 
Net income attributable to unitholdersNet income attributable to unitholders— — — — 97,749 — 97,749 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interestsNet income attributable to noncontrolling interests— — — — — 
Common units issued as a result of common shares issued by Urban EdgeCommon units issued as a result of common shares issued by Urban Edge66,588 428 475,081 — (30)— 398 
Equity redemption of OP UnitsEquity redemption of OP Units1,579,389 11,144 (1,579,389)— — — 11,144 
Repurchase of common sharesRepurchase of common shares(5,873,923)(54,141)— — — — (54,141)
Reallocation of noncontrolling interestsReallocation of noncontrolling interests— 8,833 — (19,977)— — (11,144)
Distributions to Partners ($0.68 per unit)Distributions to Partners ($0.68 per unit)— — — — (83,866)— (83,866)
Contributions from noncontrolling interestsContributions from noncontrolling interests— — — — — 5,447 5,447 
Share-based compensation expenseShare-based compensation expense— 5,871 — 11,123 — — 16,994 
Share-based awards retained for taxesShare-based awards retained for taxes(127,862)(1,465)— — — — (1,465)
Balance, December 31, 2020Balance, December 31, 2020117,014,317 $991,032 4,729,010 $41,302 $(42,313)$5,872 $995,893 
Net income attributable to unitholdersNet income attributable to unitholders— — — — 106,982 — 106,982 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interestsNet income attributable to noncontrolling interests— — — — — 833 833 
Common units issued as a result of common shares issued by Urban EdgeCommon units issued as a result of common shares issued by Urban Edge46,731 510 33,644 — (144)— 366 
Equity redemption of OP unitsEquity redemption of OP units100,000 840 (100,000)(6,302)— — (5,462)
Reallocation of noncontrolling interestsReallocation of noncontrolling interests— 8,206 — (2,744)— — 5,462 
Distributions to Partners ($0.60 per unit)Distributions to Partners ($0.60 per unit)— — — — (73,030)— (73,030)
Contributions from noncontrolling interestsContributions from noncontrolling interests— — — — — 6,241 6,241 
Share-based compensation expenseShare-based compensation expense— 2,045 — 8,774 — — 10,819 
Share-based awards retained for taxesShare-based awards retained for taxes(13,062)(210)— — — — (210)
Balance, December 31, 2021Balance, December 31, 2021117,147,986 $1,002,423 4,662,654 $41,030 $(8,505)$12,946 $1,047,894 
(1) Limited partners have a 4.6%3.8% common limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 20192021 in the form of units of interest in the Operating Partnership (“OP Units”) and Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) units.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

49
53




URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
 Year Ended December 31,
 202120202019
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES  
Net income$107,815 $97,750 $116,197 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: 
Depreciation and amortization94,135 97,751 96,641 
Casualty and impairment loss, net468 3,055 12,738 
Gain on sale of real estate(18,648)(39,775)(68,632)
Gain on sale of lease— — (1,849)
Gain on extinguishment of debt— (34,908)— 
Amortization of below market leases, net(55,173)(10,624)(15,940)
Noncash lease expense6,802 7,522 8,205 
Straight-lining of rent(878)10,523 1,021 
Share-based compensation expense10,819 16,994 13,549 
Change in operating assets and liabilities:  
Tenant and other receivables(139)5,892 8,119 
Deferred leasing costs(5,818)(1,218)(4,303)
Prepaid and other assets5,661 (41,982)(3,331)
Lease liabilities(6,227)(6,680)(7,107)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities(3,544)8,522 1,092 
Net cash provided by operating activities135,273 112,822 156,400 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES  
Real estate development and capital improvements(95,377)(28,522)(91,301)
Acquisitions of real estate(252,632)(124,340)(47,356)
Proceeds from sale of operating properties34,482 54,402 116,510 
Proceeds from sale of operating lease2,367 — 6,949 
Insurance proceeds— — 12,677 
Net cash used in investing activities(311,160)(98,460)(2,521)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES  
Debt repayments(18,192)(89,302)(5,587)
Distributions paid to partners(128,935)(27,961)(111,857)
Taxes withheld for vested restricted units(210)(1,465)(633)
Debt issuance costs— (3,471)(2,649)
Payment for redemption of units— — (5,978)
Proceeds related to the issuance of common shares366 398 439 
Cash paid to repurchase shares— (54,141)— 
Contributions from noncontrolling interests6,241 5,447 — 
Proceeds from borrowings117,200 90,250 — 
Net cash used in financing activities(23,530)(80,245)(126,265)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash(199,417)(65,883)27,614 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year419,253 485,136 457,522 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$219,836 $419,253 $485,136 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
Net income$116,197
 $116,963
 $72,938
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:  
  
Depreciation and amortization93,785
 100,063
 82,511
Income from acquired leasehold interest
 
 (39,215)
Casualty and impairment loss, net12,738
 5,574
 5,637
Gain on sale of real estate(68,632) (52,625) (202)
Gain on sale of lease(1,849) 
 
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt
 (2,524) 35,336
Amortization of deferred financing costs2,856
 2,879
 2,876
Amortization of below market leases, net(15,940) (33,975) (9,502)
Noncash lease expense8,205
 
 
Straight-lining of rent1,021
 (735) 352
Share-based compensation expense13,549
 9,741
 7,137
Credit losses related to operating lease receivables1,385
 4,138
 3,445
Change in operating assets and liabilities: 
  
  
Tenant and other receivables6,734
 (13,327) (13,749)
Deferred leasing costs(4,303) (4,675) (4,110)
Prepaid and other assets(3,331) 1,867
 (4,432)
Lease liabilities(7,107) 
 
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities1,092
 3,676
 18,876
Net cash provided by operating activities156,400
 137,040
 157,898
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
Real estate development and capital improvements(91,301) (118,765) (89,344)
Acquisition of real estate(47,356) (4,931) (211,393)
Proceeds from sale of operating properties116,510
 57,593
 5,005
Proceeds from sale of operating lease6,949
 
 
Insurance proceeds12,677
 1,300
 
Net cash used in investing activities(2,521) (64,803) (295,732)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
Debt repayments(5,587) (4,288) (129,640)
Distributions to partners(111,857) (111,360) (104,852)
Taxes withheld for vested restricted units(633) (385) (287)
Debt issuance costs(2,649) 
 (13,193)
Payment for redemption of units(5,978) 
 
Proceeds related to the issuance of common shares439
 477
 348,404
Payment on extinguishment of debt
 
 (1,138)
Purchase of marketable securities in connection with debt defeasance
 
 (536,505)
Proceeds from borrowings
 
 935,700
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(126,265) (115,556) 498,489
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash27,614
 (43,319) 360,655
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year457,522
 500,841
 140,186
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$485,136
 $457,522
 $500,841



See notes to consolidated financial statements.


50


Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2019 2018 2017202120202019
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATIONSUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION    SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION 
Cash payments for interest net of amounts capitalized of $1,425, $3,313 and $3,926, respectively$64,751
 $65,699
 $55,140
Cash payments for interest net of amounts capitalized of $2,023, $715 and $1,425, respectivelyCash payments for interest net of amounts capitalized of $2,023, $715 and $1,425, respectively$58,621 $68,113 $64,751 
Cash payments for income taxes1,601
 757
 1,237
Cash payments for income taxes4,663 499 1,601 
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES     NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Accrued capital expenditures included in accounts payable and accrued expenses5,056
 25,661
 14,651
Accrued capital expenditures included in accounts payable and accrued expenses18,702 5,808 5,056 
Write-off of fully depreciated assets56,199
 24,307
 3,286
Mortgage debt forgiven in foreclosure
 11,537
 
Acquisition of real estate through issuance of OP units
 
 171,084
Acquisition of real estate through assumption of debt
 
 69,659
Marketable securities transferred in connection with debt defeasance
 
 536,590
Defeasance of mortgages payable
 
 (505,473)
Write-off of fully depreciated and impaired assetsWrite-off of fully depreciated and impaired assets10,706 21,447 56,199 
Forgiveness of mortgage debtForgiveness of mortgage debt— 30,000 — 
Assumption of debt from the acquisition of real estateAssumption of debt from the acquisition of real estate— 72,473 — 
Dividend/distribution declared and paid in subsequent periodDividend/distribution declared and paid in subsequent period— 55,905 — 
RECONCILIATION OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASHRECONCILIATION OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH  RECONCILIATION OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year$440,430
 $490,279
 $131,654
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year$384,572 $432,954 $440,430 
Restricted cash at beginning of year17,092
 10,562
 8,532
Restricted cash at beginning of year34,681 52,182 17,092 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year$457,522
 $500,841
 $140,186
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year$419,253 $485,136 $457,522 
     
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$432,954
 $440,430
 $490,279
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$164,478 $384,572 $432,954 
Restricted cash at end of year52,182
 17,092
 10,562
Restricted cash at end of year55,358 34,681 52,182 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$485,136
 $457,522
 $500,841
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$219,836 $419,253 $485,136 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.


55
51




URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES AND URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.ORGANIZATION
1.ORGANIZATION

Urban Edge Properties (“UE”, “Urban Edge” or the “Company”) (NYSE: UE) is a Maryland real estate investment trust focused on managing, developing, redeveloping, and acquiring retail real estate in urban communities, primarily in the New York metropolitan area. Urban Edge Properties LP (“UELP” or the “Operating Partnership”) is a Delaware limited partnership formed to serve as UE’s majority-owned partnership subsidiary and to own, through affiliates, all of the Company’s real estate properties and other assets. Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Urban Edge Properties and UELP and their consolidated entities/subsidiaries.
The Operating Partnership’s capital includes general and common limited partnership interests in the operating partnership (“OP Units”). As of December 31, 2019,2021, Urban Edge owned approximately 95.4%96.2% of the outstanding common OP Units with the remaining limited OP Units held by members of management, Urban Edge’s Board of Trustees and contributors of property interests acquired. Urban Edge serves as the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. The third-party unitholders have limited rights over the Operating Partnership such that they do not have characteristics of a controlling financial interest. As such, the Operating Partnership is considered a variable interest entity (“VIE”), and the Company is the primary beneficiary which consolidates it. The Company’s only investment is the Operating Partnership. The VIE’s assets can be used for purposes other than the settlement of the VIE’s obligations and the Company’s partnership interest is considered a majority voting interest.

As of December 31, 2019,2021, our portfolio consisted of 7468 shopping centers, 45 malls and a warehouse park2 industrial parks totaling approximately 15.217.0 million sf.sf, which is inclusive of a 95% controlling interest in Walnut Creek, CA (Mt. Diablo), and an 82.5% controlling interest in Sunrise Mall, in Massapequa, NY.

2.BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
2.BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
 
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for annual financial information and with the instructions of Form 10-K. The consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019 reflect the consolidation of the Company, the Operating Partnership, wholly-owned subsidiaries and those entities in which we have a controlling financial interest. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

In accordance with the adoption of ASC 205842 Leases Presentation of Financial Statements, the Company reclassified Property rentals and Tenant reimbursement income to Rental revenue on its consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, as reflected beginning on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. Additionally,(“ASU 2016-02”), the Company includes credit losses related to operating lease receivablesrental revenue deemed uncollectible as a reduction to rental revenue in "Rental revenue" in the consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2019, as reflected in thisbeginning on Form 10-K due to the adoption of (“ASU 2016-02”) ASC 842 Leases. Provision for doubtful accounts are included in "Property operating expenses" in the consolidated statements of income for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.2019.

The Company includes real estate impairment charges, and casualty losses (gains) resulting from natural disasters in Casualty and impairment loss, net on its consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019 as reflected in this Form 10-K. Refer to Note 9, Fair Value Measurements and Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies in Part II, Item 8.8 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information regarding real estate impairment charges and casualty losses (gains), respectively.

Our primary business is the ownership, management, redevelopment, development and operation of retail shopping centers and malls. We do not distinguish our primary business or group our operations on a geographical basis for purposes of measuring performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker reviews operating and financial information for each property on an individual basis and therefore, each property represents an individual operating segment. None of our tenants accounted for more than 10% of our revenue or property operating income.income as of December 31, 2021. We aggregate all of our properties into 1 reportable segment due to their similarities with regard to the nature and economics of the properties, tenants and operations, as well as long-term average financial performance.

3.     SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results
52


could differ from those estimates. The most critical accounting policies, which involve the use of estimates and assumptions as to future uncertainties and, therefore, may result in actual amounts that differ from estimates include revenue recognition and collectibility of receivables, acquisitions of real estate and valuation of real estate. For more information on these estimates and policies refer to Part II, Item 7 Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Real Estate Real estate is carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed to operations as they are incurred. Significant renovations that improve or extend the useful lives of assets are capitalized. As real estate is undergoing redevelopment activities, all property operating expenses directly associated with and attributable to the redevelopment, including interest, are capitalized to the extent the capitalized costs of the property do not exceed the estimated fair value of the property when completed. If the cost of the redeveloped property, including the net book value of the existing property, exceeds the estimated fair value of redeveloped property, the excess is charged to impairment expense. The capitalization period begins when redevelopment activities are underwayunder way and ends when the project is substantially complete. Depreciation is recognized on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives which range from one to 40 years.

Upon the acquisition of real estate, we assess the fair value of acquired assets (including land, buildings and improvements, identified intangibles, such as acquired above and below-market leases, acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships) and acquiredassumption of liabilities and we allocate the purchase price based on these assessments on a relative fair value basis. We assess fair value based on estimated cash flow projections utilizing appropriate discount and capitalization rates and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including historical operating results, known trends, and market/economic conditions. We record acquired intangible assets (including acquired above-market leases, acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships) and acquired intangible liabilities (including below-market leases) at their estimated fair value. We amortize identified intangibles that have finite lives over the period they are expected to contribute directly or indirectly to the future cash flows of the property or business acquired.

Our properties are individually reviewedevaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Such events and changes include macroeconomic conditions, including those caused by global pandemics, like the recent COVID-19 pandemic, which resulted in property operational disruption and could indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment exists when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the aggregate projected future cash flows over the anticipated holding period on an undiscounted basis taking into account the appropriate capitalization rate.rate in determining a future terminal value. An impairment loss is measured based on the excess of the property’s carrying amount over its estimated fair value. Estimated fair value may be based on discounted future cash flows utilizing appropriate discount and capitalization rates and, in addition to available market information, third-party appraisals, broker selling estimates or sale agreements under negotiation. Impairment analyses are based on our current plans, intended holding periods and available market information at the time the analyses are prepared. If our estimates of the projected future cash flows orchange based on uncertain market conditions, change, our evaluation of impairment losses may be different and such differences could be material to our consolidated financial statements.

Real Estate Held For Sale — When a real estate asset is identified by management as held for sale, we cease depreciation of the asset and estimate its fair value, net of estimated costs to sell. If the estimated fair value, net of estimated costs to sell, of an asset is less than its net carrying value, an adjustmentimpairment charge is recorded to reflect the estimated fair value. The Company classifies properties as held for sale when executed contract contingencies have been satisfied, which signify that the sale is legally binding. As of December 31, 2019, 2 properties in Lawnside, NJ and Bethlehem, PA were classified as held for sale and the properties’ assets were included in prepaid expenses and other assets in our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2019. Refer to Note 4, Acquisitions and dispositions in Part II, Item 8. in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less and are carried at cost, which approximates fair value due to their short-term maturities. The majority of our cash and cash equivalents consists of (i) deposits at major commercial banks, including money market accounts, which may at times exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limit, (ii) United States Treasury Bills, and (iii) Certificate of Deposits placed through an Account Registry Service (“CDARS”). To date we have not experienced any losses on our invested cash.

Restricted Cash Restricted cash consists of security deposits and cash escrowed under loan agreements for debt service, real estate taxes, property insurance, tenant improvements, leasing commissions, capital expenditures and cash held for potential Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 tax deferred exchange transactions.

Accounts ReceivableTenant and Other Receivables and Changes in Collectibility Assessment Accounts receivable includesTenant receivables include unpaid amounts billed to tenants, disputed enforceable charges and accrued revenues for future billings to tenants for property expenses. We periodically evaluate the collectibility of amounts due from tenants and disputed enforceable charges resultingon both a lease-by-lease and a portfolio-level, which result from the inability of tenants to make required payments under their operating lease agreements. We recognize changes in the collectibility assessment of these operating leases as adjustments to rental revenue.revenue in accordance with ASC 842
53


Leases. Management exercises judgment in assessing collectibility and considers payment history, and current credit status. Accounts receivablestatus and publicly available information about the financial condition of the tenant, among other factors. Tenant receivables, and receivables arising from the straight-lining of rents, are written-off directly when they are deemed to be uncollectible.management deems the collectibility of substantially all future lease payments from a specific lease is not probable, at which point, the Company will begin recognizing revenue from such leases prospectively, based on actual amounts received. This write-off effectively reduces cumulative non-cash rental income recognized from the straight-lining of rents since lease commencement. If the Company subsequently determines that it is probable it will collect substantially all of the lessee’s remaining lease payments under the lease term, the Company will reinstate the receivables balance, including those arising from the straight-lining of rents.

Deferred Leasing Costs — Deferred leasing costs include incremental costs of a lease that would have not been incurred if the lease had not been executed, including broker and sale commissions, and contingent legal fees. Such costs are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related leases.leases as depreciation and amortization expense on the consolidated statements of income. Deferred leasing costs also includes lease incentives that can be used at the discretion of the tenant. Lease incentives are capitalized and amortized over the term of the related leases as a reduction to rental revenue on the consolidated statements of income.



Deferred Financing Costs — Deferred financing costs include fees associated with our revolving credit agreement. Such fees are amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related revolving credit agreement as a component of interest expense, which approximates the effective interest rate method, in accordance with the terms of the agreement. NaNNo amounts have beenwere drawn to dateor outstanding under the revolving credit agreement.agreement as of December 31, 2021. Deferred financing costs are included in prepaid expenses and other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.

Revenue Recognition We have the following revenue sources and revenue recognition policies:

Rental revenue for fiscal periods prior to January 1, 2019:
Rental revenue: Rental revenue comprises revenue from property rentals and tenant expense reimbursements, as designated within tenant operating leases in accordance with ASC 840 Leases.
Property Rentals: We generate revenue from minimum lease payments from tenant operating leases. These rents are recognized over the noncancelable terms of the related leases on a straight-line basis which includes the effects of rent steps and rent abatements under the leases in accordance with ASC 840. We satisfy our performance obligations over time, under the noncancelable lease term, commencing when the tenant takes possession of the leased space and the leased space is substantially ready for its intended use. In addition, in circumstances where we provide a lease incentive to tenants, we recognize the incentive as a reduction of rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the lease. The underlying leased asset remains on our consolidated balance sheet and continues to depreciate. In addition to minimum lease payments, certain rental income derived from our tenant leases is contingent and dependent on percentage rent. Percentage rents are earned by the Company in the event the tenant's gross sales exceed certain amounts. Terms of percentage rent are agreed upon in the tenant's lease and will vary based on the tenant's sales.
Tenant expense reimbursements:In accordance with ASC 840, revenue arises from tenant leases, which provide for the recovery of all or a portion of the operating expenses, real estate taxes and capital improvements of the respective property. This revenue is accrued in the period the expenses are incurred.
Rental revenue for fiscal periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019: Rental revenue comprises revenue from fixed and variable lease payments, as designated within tenant operating leases in accordance with ASC 842 Leases, as described further in ourLeases accounting policy in Note 3 to the audited consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Additionally, credit losses related to operating lease receivables are recognized as adjustments to rental revenue in accordance with ASC 842.
Credit losses related to operating lease receivables: We periodically evaluate the collectibility of amounts due from tenants and disputed enforceable charges, resulting from the inability of tenants to make required payments under their lease agreements. We recognize changes in the collectibility assessment of these operating leases as adjustments to rental revenue.
Income from acquired leasehold interest: Incomefixed and variable lease payments, as designated within tenant operating leases in accordance with ASC 842 Leases, as described further in ourLeases accounting policy in Note 3 to the audited consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Rental revenue deemed uncollectible: We evaluate the collectibility of amounts due from acquired leasehold interest wastenants and disputed enforceable charges on both a lease-by-lease and a portfolio-level, which result from the inability of tenants to make required payments under their operating lease agreements. We recognize changes in the collectibility assessment of these operating leases as adjustments to rental revenue in accordance with ASC 842.
Other Income: Other income is generated in connection with the write-off of an unamortized intangible liability balance relatedcertain services provided to the below-market ground lease as welltenants for which we earn a fee. This revenue is recognized as the balance of the straight-line receivable balance, upon acquisition of the leasehold interest of the property.
Other Income: Other income is generated in connection with certain services provided to tenants for which we earn a fee. This revenue is recognized as the services are transferred in accordance with ASC 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers.
Revenue from Contracts with Customers.
Management and development fees: We generate management and development fee income from contractual property management agreements with third parties. This revenue is recognized as the services are transferred in accordance with ASC 606.
Leases — We have approximately 1,100900 operating leases at our retail shopping centers and malls,properties, which generate rental income from tenants and operating cash flows for the Company. Our tenant leases are dependent on the Company, as lessor, agreeing to provide our tenants with the right to control the use of our real estate assets, as lessees. Our real estate assets are comprised of retail shopping centers, malls and malls.industrial parks. Tenants agree to use and control their agreed upon space for their business purposes. Thus, our tenants obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from the use of our shopping center space and have the right to direct how and for what purpose the real estate space is used throughout the period of use. Given these contractual terms, the Company has determined that all tenant contracts of this nature contain a lease. The Company assesses lease classification for each new and modified lease. All new and modified tenant leases which commenced in the year ended December 31, 20192021 have been assessed and classified as operating leases.

Contractual rent increases of renewal options are often fixed at the time of the initial lease agreement which may result in tenants being able to exercise their renewal options at amounts that are less than the fair value of the rent at the date of renewal. In addition to fixed base rents, certain rental income derived from our tenant leases is variable and may be dependent on percentage rent or the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"). Variable lease payments from percentage rents are earned by the Company in the event the


tenant's gross sales exceed certain amounts. Terms of percentage rent are agreed upon in the tenant's lease and will vary based on the tenant's sales. Variable lease payments dependent on the CPI, will change in accordance with the corresponding increase or decrease in CPI if negotiated and agreed upon in the tenant's lease. Variable lease payments dependent on percentage rent and the CPI were $4.1$9.8 million and $2.4 million for the yearyears ended December 31, 2019.2021 and 2020, respectively. Variable lease payments also arise from tenant expense reimbursements, which provide for the recovery of all or a portion of the operating expenses, common area maintenance expenses, real estate taxes, insurance and capital improvements of
54


the respective property and amounted to $105.3$101.3 million and $96.7 million for the yearyears ended December 31, 2019.2021 and 2020, respectively. The Company accounts for variable lease payments as "Rental revenue"Rental revenue on the consolidated statementstatements of income in the period in which the changes in facts and circumstances on which the variable lease payments are based occur.

The Company also has 2120 properties in its portfolio either completely or partially on land or in a building that are owned by third parties. These properties are leased or subleased to us pursuant to ground leases, building leases or easements, with remaining terms ranging from less than two yearsone to over 8078 years and provide us the right to operate each such property. We also lease or sublease real estate for our 3 corporate offices with remaining terms of less than one year. Right-of-use ("ROU") assets are recorded for these leases, which represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from these leases. ROU assets and lease liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the estimated present value of lease payments over the lease term. The initial measurement of a ROU asset may differ from the initial measurement of the lease liability due to initial direct costs, prepaid lease payments and lease incentives. As of December 31, 2019,2021, no other contracts have been identified as leases. Our leases often offer renewal options, which we assess against relevant economic factors to determine whether the Company is reasonably certain of exercising or not exercising the option. Lease payments associated with renewal periods, for which the Company has determined are reasonably certain of being exercised, are included in the measurement of the corresponding lease liability and ROU asset.

For finance leases and operating leases, the discount rate applied to measure each ROU asset and lease liability is based on the incremental borrowing rate of the lease due to the rate implicit in the lease not being readily determinable. The Company initially considers the general economic environment and factors in various financing and asset specific secured borrowings so that the overall incremental borrowing rate is appropriate to the intended use of the lease. Certain expenses derived from these leases are variable and are not included in the measurement of the corresponding lease liability and ROU asset, but are recognized in the period in which the obligation for those payments is incurred. These variable lease payments consist of payments for real estate taxes and common area maintenance, which is dependent on projects and activities at each individual property under ground or building lease.

Noncontrolling Interests — Noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries represent the portion of equity that we do not own in those entities that we consolidate. We identify our noncontrolling interests separately within the equity section on the consolidated balance sheets. Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership include OP units and limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership in the form of long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”) unit awards classified as equity.

Variable Interest Entities — Certain entities that do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties, or for which do not havethe equity owners as a group lack any one of the following characteristics: (i) the power, through voting rights or similar rights, to direct the activities of a legal entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses do not haveof the legal entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns or do not haveof the characteristics of a controlling financial interestlegal entity, qualify as VIEs. VIEs are required to be consolidated by their primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary of a VIE has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact economic performance of the VIE and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The consolidated financial statements reflect the consolidation of VIEs in which the Company is the primary beneficiary.

Management uses its judgment when determining if we are the primary beneficiary of, or have a controlling financial interest in, an entity in which we have a variable interest. Factors considered in determining whether we have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance include voting rights, involvement in day-to-day capital and operating decisions and the extent of our involvement in the entity.

Excluding the Operating Partnership, the Company had 2 entities that met the criteria of a VIE in which we held variable interests as of December 31, 2021 and 2020. These entities are VIEs primarily because the noncontrolling interests do not have substantive kick-out or participating rights and we control the significant operating decisions and consequently have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of these entities. As we also have the obligation to absorb the majority of the losses and/or the right to receive a majority of the benefits for these entities, they were consolidated in our financial statements as of December 31, 2021 and 2020. The majority of the operations of these VIEs are funded with cash flows generated by the properties and periodic cash contributions.

As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, excluding the Operating Partnership, the 2 consolidated VIEs had total assets of $48.5 million and $43.6 million, respectively and total liabilities of $24.7 million and $31.5 million, respectively.

55


Earnings Per Share and Unit Basic earnings per common share and unit is computed by dividing net income attributable to common shareholders and unitholders by the weighted average common shares and units outstanding during the period. Unvested share-based payment awards that entitle holders to receive non-forfeitable dividends, such as our restricted stock awards, are classified as “participating securities.” Because the awards are considered participating securities, the Company and the Operating Partnership are required to apply the two-class method of computing basic and diluted earnings that would otherwise have been available to common shareholders and unitholders. Under the two-class method, earnings for the period are allocated between common shareholders and unitholders and other shareholders and unitholders, based on their respective rights to receive dividends. During periods of net loss, losses are allocated only to the extent the participating securities are required to absorb their share of such losses. Diluted earnings per common share and unit reflects the potential dilution of the assumed exercises of shares including stock options and unvested restricted shares to the extent they are dilutive.

Share-Based Compensation We grant stock options, LTIP units, OP units, deferred share units, restricted share awards and performance-based units to our officers, trustees and employees. The term of each award is determined by the compensation committee of our Board of Trustees (the “Compensation Committee”), but in no event can such term be longer than ten years from the date of grant. The vesting schedule of each award is determined by the Compensation Committee, in its sole and absolute


discretion, at the date of grant of the award. Dividends are paid on certain shares of unvested restricted stock, which makes the restricted stock a participating security.

Fair value is determined, depending on the type of award, using either the Black-Scholes option-pricing model or the Monte Carlo method, both of which are intended to estimate the fair value of the awards at the grant date. In using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, expected volatilities and dividend yields are primarily based on available implied data and peer group companies’ historical data. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

Compensation expense for restricted share awards is based on the fair value of our common shares at the date of the grant and is recognized ratably over the vesting period. For grants with a graded vesting schedule or a cliff vesting schedule, we have elected to recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis. The OPP unrecognized compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the OPP awards issued. Share-based compensation expense is included in general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of income.

When the Company issues common shares as compensation, it receives a like number of common units from the Operating Partnership. Accordingly, the Company’s ownership in the Operating Partnership will increase based on the number of common shares awarded under our 2015 Omnibus Share Plan. As a result of the issuance of common units to the Company for share-based compensation, the Operating Partnership accounts for share-based compensation in the same manner as the Company.

Income Taxes Our 2The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT under sections 856-860 of the Code, commencing with the filing of its 2015 tax return for its tax year ended December 31, 2015. With the exception of the Company’s TRS, to the extent the Company meets certain requirements under the Code, the Company will not be taxed on its federal taxable income. If we fail to qualify as a REIT for any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any alternative minimum tax, which, for corporations, was repealed under the TCJA for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for the four subsequent taxable years. In addition to its TRS, the Company is subject to certain foreign and state and local income taxes, in particular income taxes arising from its operating activities in Puerto Rico, malls are subject to income taxes which are based on estimated taxable income and are included in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income.

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis.basis and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which thesethose temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Earnings and profits,The Company provides a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for which determineit does not consider realization of such assets to be more likely than not.

The Company applies the taxability of dividendsFASB’s guidance relating to shareholders, differsuncertainty in income taxes recognized in a Company’s financial statements. Under this guidance the Company may recognize the tax benefit from net income reported for financial reporting purposes primarily because of differences in depreciable lives and cost basesan uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the malls,position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The guidance on accounting for uncertainty in income taxes also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, and accounting in interim periods. The Company records interest and penalties relating to unrecognized tax benefits, if any, as well as other timing differences.income tax expense

56


Concentration of Credit Risk A concentration of credit risk arises in our business when a national or regionally-based tenant occupies a substantial amount of space in multiple properties owned by us. In that event, if the tenant suffers a significant downturn in its business, it may become unable to make its contractual rent payments to us, exposing us to potential losses in rental revenue, expense recoveries, and percentage rent. Further, the impact may be magnified if the tenant is renting space in multiple locations. Generally, we do not obtain security from our national or regionally-based tenants in support of their lease obligations to us. We regularly monitor our tenant base to assess potential concentrations of credit risk. None of our tenants accounted for more than 10% of total revenues in the year ended December 31, 2019.2021. As of December 31, 2019,2021, The Home DepotTJX Companies, Inc. was our largest tenant with 7NaN stores which comprised an aggregate of 920,000714,731 sf and accounted for approximately $23.0$20.6 million, or 5.9%4.8% of our total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019.2021.

Recently Issued Accounting Literature
Effective for the fiscal period beginning January 1, 2019, we adopted (“ASU 2016-02”) ASC 842 Leases, which sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both parties to a contract (i.e. lessees and lessors). In connection with the adoption of ASU 2016-02, we also adopted (i) ASU 2019-01 Leases (ASC 842): Codification Improvements, (ii) ASU 2018-20 Leases (ASC 842): Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors, (iii) ASU 2018-11 Leases (ASC 842): Targeted Improvements, (iv) ASU 2018-10 Codification Improvements to ASC 842, Leases and (v) ASU 2018-01 Leases (ASC 842): Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842.

We initially applied the standard at the beginning of the period of adoption through the transition method issued by ASU 2018-11 and have presented comparative periods under ASC 840 Leases. Due to the effects of applying ASC 842, the Company recognized a $2.9 million cumulative-effect adjustment to its accumulated deficit in the year ended December 31, 2019 to adjust reserves on receivables from straight-line rents. The new standard requires lessees to apply a two-model approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. This classification determines whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. A lessee is also required to record a ROU asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months regardless of their classification. The Company has elected the short-term lease recognition exemption, and therefore, leases with a term of 12 months or less are not recognized on the balance sheet. The new standard requires lessors to account for leases using an approach that is substantially equivalent to guidance for sales-type leases, direct financing leases and operating leases under ASC 840. For purposes of transition, we did not elect the hindsight practical expedient but did elect the land easement practical expedient to not reassess whether existing land easements contain leases and the practical expedient package, which has been applied consistently to all of


our leases. As a result of electing the practical expedient package, we did not (i) reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (ii) reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing leases or (iii) reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases.

From a lessee perspective, the initial adoption on January 1, 2019 resulted in the recognition of operating lease ROU assets and lease liabilities for 24 operating leases with an aggregate balance of $98.5 million and $93.6 million, respectively. On January 1, 2019,liabilities. Additionally, we also reclassified $11.9 millioncertain amounts of acquired below-market lease intangibles and $7.1 million of accrued rent and adjusted the carrying values of our ROU assets by the corresponding amounts. As of December 31, 2019,2021, the Company had 24 operating leases and our operating lease ROU assets and lease liabilities were $81.8$69.4 million and $79.9$64.6 million, respectively, as presented on our consolidated balance sheet. Subsequent to adoption, the Company recognized aAs of December 31, 2021, our finance lease ROU asset and finance lease liability ofliabilities were $2.7 million and $3.0 million, respectively, in connection withrespectively. The finance lease ROU asset is included within prepaid expenses and other assets on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 and the Company’s acquisitionfinance lease liability is included within accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets as of the lessee position of a ground lease on November 1, 2019.December 31, 2021 and 2020. The Company recognizes interest expense on theits finance lease liability. The standard's adoption has also impacted the presentation of our consolidated income statementstatements due to accounting for the lease and non-lease components as a single lease component for all classes of underlying assets, presented as lease expense on the consolidated statementstatements of income. Prior to the adoption of ASC 842, related lease and non-lease expense amounts were recognized within lease expense, real estate taxes, property operating expenses and general administrative expenses on the consolidated statementstatements of income.

From a lessor perspective, the adoption resulted in additional general and administrative expenses, attributable to internal leasing department costs not meeting the definition of initial direct costs under ASC 842. Capitalized internal leasing costs were $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The standard's adoption has also impacted the presentation of our consolidated income statementstatements due to accounting for lease and non-lease components as a single lease component, presented as rental revenue on the consolidated statementstatements of income, however there has been no change in the timing of revenue recognition since adoption. Additionally, under the amendments issued in ASU 2018-20, the Company has accounted for common area maintenance expenses of $2.7 million paid directly by tenants to third-parties as variable rental revenue and has reported the corresponding expense within property operating expenses. Real estate taxes and insurance expenses paid directly by tenants have not been recognized as rental revenue real estate taxes and property operatingor as expenses on the consolidated statements of income.

57


In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04 Reference Rate Reform (ASC 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting, which provides temporary optional guidance to ease the potential burden in accounting for reference rate reform. ASU 2020-04 is effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. We currently do not anticipate the need to modify our existing debt agreements as a result of reference rate reform in the current year, however if any modification is executed as a result of reference rate reform, the Company will elect the optional expedient available under ASU 2020-04, which allows entities to account for the modification as if the modification was not substantial. We will disclose the nature of and reason for electing the optional expedient in each interim and annual financial statement period if and when applicable through December 31, 2022.

In April 2020, the FASB issued a question-and-answer document (the “Lease Modification Q&A”) focused on the application of lease accounting guidance to lease concessions provided as a result of COVID-19. Under existing lease guidance, the Company would have to determine, on a lease by lease basis, if a lease concession was the result of a new arrangement reached with the tenant (treated with the lease modification accounting framework) or if a lease concession was under the enforceable rights and obligations within the existing lease agreement (precluded from applying the lease modification accounting framework). The Lease Modification Q&A clarifies that entities may elect to not evaluate whether lease-related relief, that lessors provide to mitigate the economic effects of COVID-19 on lessees, is a lease modification under ASC 842. Instead, when the cash flows resulting from the lease concession granted for COVID-19 rent relief are substantially the same or less than the cash flows of the original contract, an entity may elect to apply the modification guidance (i.e. assume the relief was always contemplated by the contract or assume the relief was not contemplated by the contract).

The adoptionFASB stated that there are multiple ways to account for rent concessions, none of this standardwhich the FASB believes are more preferable than the others. Two of those methods are: (i) account for the concessions as if no changes to the lease contract were made; under that accounting, a lessor would continue to increase its lease receivable and continue to recognize income, referred to as the “receivable approach”; or (ii) account for the deferred payments or abatements as variable lease payments; under that accounting, a lessor would recognize the payment as income in profit or loss in the period in which the changes in facts and circumstances on which the variable lease payments are based occurred, referred to as the “variable approach”.

The Company makes the election to account for rent concessions using the receivable approach or variable approach a on a disaggregated basis, with such election applied consistently to leases with similar characteristics and similar circumstances. As of December 31, 2021, the Company has granted rent deferrals accounted under both the receivable approach by electing the Lease Modification Q&A and as modifications due to term extensions of the leases. The Company has also resultedgranted abatements accounted for under both the variable approach and as modifications due to the executed agreements including other rental term modifications, such as term extensions and substantial changes in additional quantitative and qualitative footnote disclosures (refercash flows. Refer to Note 8 Leases10 to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K).

10-K.
Effective for the fiscal period beginning January 1, 2020, we adopted ASU 2016-13,
Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (ASC 326): Measurement of Credit Losses. In connection with the adoption of ASU 2016-03, we also adopted (i) ASU 2018-19 Codification Improvements to ASC 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses, (ii)ASU 2019-04, Codification Improvements to ASC 326, Financial Statements - Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging and Topic 825, Financial Instruments, (iii) ASU 2019-05 Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (ASC 326): Targeted Transition Relief and (iv)ASU 2019-11 Codification Improvements to ASC 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses. ASU 2016-13 introduces a new model for estimating credit losses for certain types of financial instruments and also modifies the impairment model with new methodology for estimating credits losses. In November 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-19 Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses, which included amendments to clarify receivables arising from operating leases are within the scope ASC 842. Due to the adoption of ASC 842, the Company includes credit losses related to operating lease receivables as a reduction to rental revenue in "Rental revenue" in the consolidated statements of income. The adoption of ASU 2016-13 will not have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13 Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 modifies the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements by removing, modifying, and/or adding certain disclosures. ASU 2018-13 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. We elected to early adopt ASU 2018-13 effective January 1, 2019. The adoption of ASU 2018-13 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12 Income Taxes (ASC 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, which enhances and simplifies various aspects of the income tax accounting. ASU 2019-12 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact ASU 2019-12 may have to our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

Any other recently issued accounting standards or pronouncements not disclosed above have been excluded as they are not relevant to the Company or the Operating Partnership, or they are not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.





















61
58


4.     ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS

4.ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS

Acquisitions

During the years ended December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, we closed on the following acquisitions:
Date Purchased Property Name City State Square Feet Purchase Price 
          (in thousands) 
November 1, 2019 25 East Spring Valley Ave Maywood NJ 43,800
 $7,162
 
November 8, 2019 Wonderland Marketplace Revere MA 139,500
 24,209
 
December 9, 2019 150 Route 4 East Paramus NJ 12,000
 7,118
 
        2019 Total$38,489
(1) 
            
January 26, 2018 938 Spring Valley Road Maywood NJ 2,000
 $719
 
February 23, 2018 116 Sunrise Highway Freeport NY 4,750
 447
 
February 28, 2018 197 West Spring Valley Ave Maywood NJ 16,300
 2,799
 
May 24, 2018 7 Francis Place Montclair NJ 3,000
 966
 
        2018 Total$4,931
(1) 
Date PurchasedProperty NameCityStateSquare FeetPurchase Price
(in thousands)
August 10, 2021601 Murray RoadEast HanoverNJ88,000 $18,312 
August 19, 2021151 Ridgedale AvenueEast HanoverNJ187,000 37,759 
December 23, 2021Woodmore Towne CentreGlenardenMD712,000 198,055 
2021 Total$254,126 (1)
February 12, 2020Kingswood CenterBrooklynNY130,000 $90,212 
February 12, 2020Kingswood CrossingBrooklynNY110,000 77,077 
December 11, 202051 East Spring Valley AveMaywoodNJ3,000 662 
December 31, 2020Sunrise MallMassapequaNY1,211,000 31,545 
2020 Total$199,496 (1)
(1) The total purchase pricesprice for the properties acquired in the yearyears ended December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018, respectively,2020 include $0.3$5.2 million and $0.1$3.1 million, respectively, of transaction costs incurred in relation to the transactions.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company purchased 3 assets, at an aggregate purchase price of $254.1 million and 987,000 sf, comprising two assets located in East Hanover, NJ, and one asset located in Glenarden, MD.

In December 2021, the Company closed on the acquisition of Woodmore Towne Centre, a 712,000 sf retail center located in Glenarden, MD, for a purchase price of $198.1 million, including transaction costs. The property is 97% leased and sits on 83 acres and includes an additional 22 acres of land adjacent to the main parcel that may be developed for a complementary commercial use in the future. To partially fund the acquisition, the Company entered into a 10-year, $117.2 million non-recourse first mortgage secured by the property. The mortgage has a fixed interest rate of 3.39% and is interest-only for the entire loan term.

The 2 industrial properties, acquired in August 2021, are adjacent to our existing 943,000 sf warehouse park in East Hanover, NJ. The acquisition of 151 Ridgedale Avenue was partially funded via a 1031 exchange using cash proceeds from previous dispositions.

The Company purchased 34 assets with a total consideration of $38$199.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2019. NaN2020. 2 of the assets are located in Brooklyn, NY, 1 asset is located in the Boston metropolitan areaMassapequa, NY and 2 assets are1 asset is located in Maywood, NJ and is adjacent to our existing property, Bergen Town Center.

The acquisitionsCompany acquired Sunrise Mall in Massapequa, NY for $31.5 million, including transaction costs on December 31, 2020. The Company’s acquired ownership interest of the asset is 82.5% with the remaining 17.5% held by strategic partners.

The Company acquired Kingswood Center and Kingswood Crossing for $167.3 million, including transaction costs on February 12, 2020. The properties are located along Kings Highway in the Midwood neighborhood of Brooklyn, NY and were executed through Internal Revenue Code Sectionfunded via 1031 tax deferred exchange transactions and fundedexchanges using cash proceeds from dispositions. TheAdditionally, as part of the acquisition of Kingswood Center, the Company assumed a $65.5 million mortgage, which matures in 2028.

A portion of the acquisition of Kingswood Crossing was completed as a reverse Section 1031 exchange. We entered into a reverse Section 1031 exchange agreement with third-party intermediaries, which, for a maximum of 180 days, allowed us to defer for tax purposes, gains on the sale of other properties purchased duringidentified and sold within the year ended December 31, 2018period. Until the earlier of the termination of the exchange agreements or 180 days after the respective acquisition dates, the third-party intermediaries are the legal owner of the properties; however, we controlled the activities that most significantly impact each property and retained all adjacent to centers currently owned byof the Company. Consideration foreconomic benefits and risks associated with each property. Therefore, at the date of acquisition, we determined that we were the primary beneficiary of these purchases consistedvariable interest entities and consolidated the properties and their operations as of cash.the acquisition date.


59


The aggregate purchase price of the above property acquisitions has been allocated as follows:
Property Name Land Buildings and improvements 
Identified intangible assets(1)
 
Identified intangible liabilities(1)
 ROU asset net of lease liability Total Purchase Price
(in thousands)            
25 East Spring Valley Ave(2)
 $
 $6,824
 $623
 $(31) $(254) $7,162
Wonderland Marketplace 6,323
 17,130
 2,947
 (2,191) 
 24,209
150 Route 4 East 7,118
 
 
 
 
 7,118
2019 Total $13,441
 $23,954
 $3,570
 $(2,222) $(254) $38,489
             
938 Spring Valley Road $519
 $200
 $
 $
 $
 $719
116 Sunrise Highway 151
 296
 
 
 
 447
197 West Spring Valley Ave 1,768
 1,031
 
 
 
 2,799
7 Francis Place 381
 585
 
 
 
 966
2018 Total $2,819
 $2,112

$

$

$
 $4,931
Property NameLandBuildings and improvements
Identified intangible assets(1)
Identified intangible liabilities(1)
Debt PremiumROU assets net of lease liabilitiesOther assets, netTotal Purchase Price
(in thousands)
601 Murray Road$2,075 $14,733 $1,722 $(218)$— — — 18,312 
151 Ridgedale Avenue2,990 35,509 — (740)— — — 37,759 
Woodmore Towne Centre(3)
28,398 144,834 23,128 (8,035)— — $9,730 198,055 
2021 Total$33,463 $195,076 $24,850 $(8,993)$— $— $9,730 $254,126 
Kingswood Center$15,690 $76,766 $9,263 $(4,534)$(6,973)$— $— $90,212 
Kingswood Crossing8,150 64,159 4,768 — — — — 77,077 
51 East Spring Valley Ave662 — — — — — — 662 
Sunrise Mall(2)
44,035 3,084 5,495 (26,495)— 5,012 414 31,545 
2020 Total$68,537 $144,009 $19,526 $(31,029)$(6,973)$5,012 $414 $199,496 
(1) As of December 31, 2019,2021, the remaining weighted average amortization periods of the identified intangible assets and identified intangible liabilities acquired in 20192021 were 11.28.7 years and 23.814.7 years, respectively and the remaining weighted average amortization periods of the identified intangible assets and identified intangible liabilities acquired in 2020 were 10.3 years and 27.2 years, respectively.
(2) In connection with this acquisition, the Company acquired the lessee positionpositions of a ground leaseleases and recognized a financeoperating lease ROU assetassets and financeoperating lease liability of $2.7 million and $3.0 million, respectively.

As of December 31, 2019,liabilities. Refer to Note 8 to the Company was under contract to purchase 2 properties situated in the Midwood section of Brooklyn, NY for $165 million. A $10.0 million deposit related to these acquisitions wasconsolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.
(3) The amount allocated to Other assets, net relates to future reimbursements from the balance ofcounty for development work performed by the Company’s prepaidprevious owner and is included in Prepaid expenses and other assets in theon our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2019. In February 2020 we completed the acquisitions of these properties.sheets.





Dispositions

During the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, we disposed of 83 properties and 1 property parcel and received proceeds of $112.8$34.9 million, net of selling costs, resulting in a $68.6an $18.6 million net gain on sale of real estate on our consolidated statements of income duringestate. Of these dispositions completed during the year ended December 31, 2019. We disposed2021, two were completed as a 1031 exchange with the acquisition of 2 additional properties in January 2020151 Ridgedale Avenue, allowing for net cash proceedsthe deferral of $27.9 million.capital gains from the sale for income tax purposes.

During the year ended December 31, 20192021, the Company also sold its lessee position in 1 of its ground leaseslease at Vallejo, CA and received proceeds of $6.9$2.4 million, net of selling costs, and derecognized the lease’s ROU asset and corresponding lease liability. We recognized a gain on sale of lease of $1.8 million liability related to the lease.
on our consolidated statements of income
during
During the year ended December 31, 2019 as a result2020, we disposed of the sale.
On April 26, 2018, we completed the sale3 properties and received proceeds of our property in Allentown, PA, which was previously classified as held for sale, for $54.3 million, net of selling costs. As a result of this transaction, we recognized a $50.4 million gain on sale of real estate during the year ended December 31, 2018.
On July 5, 2018, we completed the sale of land in Cherry Hill, NJ for $3.3$58.1 million, net of selling costs, resulting in a $39.8 million net gain on sale of $2.2 million.real estate. The sale of all 3 dispositions were completed as 1031 exchanges with Kingswood Crossing as a result of the sales occurring within 180 days of the Company’s acquisition.

Real Estate Held for Sale
As of December 31, 2019, our 2 properties2020, a parcel of 1 property in Lawnside,Lodi, NJ and Bethlehem, PA werewas classified as held for sale based on an executed contractscontract of sale with a third-party buyers. The Company classifies properties as held for sale when executed contract contingencies have been satisfied, which signify that the sale is legally binding.buyer. The aggregate amount of these propertiesthis parcel was $3.5$7.1 million and $3.1 million, respectively, and werewas included in prepaid expenses and other assets in our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2019.2020. The parcel was sold in January 2021. There was no real estate held for sale as of December 31, 2021.






63
60




5.     IDENTIFIED INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

The following table summarizes our identified intangible assets and liabilities:
(Amounts in thousands)December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018(Amounts in thousands)December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
In-place leases$71,328
 $75,454
In-place leases$96,648 $82,303 
Accumulated amortization(27,254) (24,713)Accumulated amortization(33,057)(32,515)
Below-market ground leases(1)

 23,730
Accumulated amortization(1)

 (11,791)
Above-market leases6,100
 7,129
Above-market leases10,185 9,255 
Accumulated amortization(2,998) (2,565)Accumulated amortization(3,147)(3,570)
Other intangible assets1,635
 1,635
Other intangible assets1,635 1,635 
Accumulated amortization(690) (457)Accumulated amortization(1,157)(924)
Identified intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization48,121
 68,422
Identified intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization71,107 56,184 
Below-market leases191,440
 209,316
Below-market leases135,654 219,558 
Accumulated amortization(62,610) (65,058)Accumulated amortization(35,029)(71,375)
Identified intangible liabilities, net of accumulated amortization$128,830
 $144,258
Identified intangible liabilities, net of accumulated amortization$100,625 $148,183 
(1)In connection with the adoption of ASC 842 on January 1, 2019, we reclassified acquired below-market lease intangibles and adjusted the carrying values of our ROU assets by the corresponding amount.

Amortization of acquired below-market leases, net of acquired above-market leases resulted in rental income of $15.9$55.2 million $34.0, $10.6 million, and $9.5$15.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, 2018respectively. On September 29, 2021, the Company entered into agreements to terminate our three remaining Kmart and 2017, respectively.Sears leases effective October 15, 2021. The modification of these leases resulted in accelerated amortization of the below-market intangible lease liabilities of $45.9 million which is included in rental revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021. The intangibles related to these leases were fully amortized and subsequently written-off in 2021.
 
Amortization of acquired in-place leases and customer relationships resulted in depreciation and amortization expense of $8.8$8.6 million $15.1, $10.2 million $9.3, and $8.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, 2018respectively. During 2021, we recognized $0.4 million of accelerated amortization of the in-place lease intangibles related to the Kmart and 2017, respectively.Sears lease terminations noted above.

The following table sets forth the estimated annual amortization expense(expense) and income related to intangible assets and liabilities for the five succeeding years commencing January 1, 2020:2022:
(Amounts in thousands)Below-MarketAbove-MarketIn-Place Lease
YearOperating Lease AmortizationOperating Lease AmortizationAmortization
2022$7,817 $(1,154)$(10,103)
20237,771 (1,092)(8,355)
20247,536 (996)(7,127)
20257,354 (803)(6,082)
20266,976 (683)(5,469)
(Amounts in thousands) Below-Market Above-Market  
Year Operating Lease Amortization Operating Lease Amortization In-Place Leases
2020 $9,648
 $(998) $(6,506)
2021 9,509
 (799) (5,212)
2022 9,433
 (435) (4,285)
2023 9,381
 (325) (3,814)
2024 9,146
 (262) (3,341)


61

64




6.     MORTGAGES PAYABLE
 
The following is a summary of mortgages payable as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018.2020.
 Interest Rate atDecember 31,December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)MaturityDecember 31, 202120212020
First mortgages secured by: 
Variable rate
Cherry Hill (Plaza at Cherry Hill)(1)
5/24/20221.70%$28,244 $28,930 
Woodbridge (Plaza at Woodbridge)(1)
5/25/20221.70%54,029 55,340 
Jersey City (Hudson Commons)(2)
11/15/20242.00%28,034 28,586 
Watchung(2)
11/15/20242.00%26,097 26,613 
Bronx (1750-1780 Gun Hill Road)(2)
12/1/20242.00%24,680 25,172 
Westfield (One Lincoln Plaza)(3)
—%— 4,730 
Total variable rate debt161,084 169,371 
Fixed rate
Paramus (Bergen Town Center - West)4/8/20233.56%300,000 300,000 
Bronx (Shops at Bruckner)5/1/20233.90%9,698 10,351 
Jersey City (Hudson Mall)12/1/20235.07%22,154 22,904 
Yonkers Gateway Center4/6/20244.16%26,774 28,482 
Brick12/10/20243.87%49,554 50,000 
North Plainfield12/10/20253.99%25,100 25,100 
Las Catalinas2/1/20264.43%123,977 127,669 
Middletown12/1/20263.78%31,400 31,400 
Rockaway12/1/20263.78%27,800 27,800 
East Hanover (200 - 240 Route 10 West)12/10/20264.03%63,000 63,000 
North Bergen (Tonnelle Ave)4/1/20274.18%100,000 100,000 
Manchester6/1/20274.32%12,500 12,500 
Millburn6/1/20273.97%22,944 23,381 
Totowa12/1/20274.33%50,800 50,800 
Woodbridge (Woodbridge Commons)12/1/20274.36%22,100 22,100 
East Brunswick12/6/20274.38%63,000 63,000 
East Rutherford1/6/20284.49%23,000 23,000 
Brooklyn (Kingswood Center)2/6/20285.07%70,815 71,696 
Hackensack3/1/20284.36%66,400 66,400 
Marlton12/1/20283.86%37,400 37,400 
East Hanover Warehouses12/1/20284.09%40,700 40,700 
Union (2445 Springfield Ave)12/10/20284.01%45,600 45,600 
Freeport (Freeport Commons)12/10/20294.07%43,100 43,100 
Montehiedra6/1/20305.00%79,381 81,141 
Montclair8/15/20303.15%7,250 7,250 
Garfield12/1/20304.14%40,300 40,300 
Woodmore Towne Centre1/6/20323.39%117,200 — 
Mt Kisco11/15/20346.40%12,377 12,952 
Total fixed rate debt1,534,324 1,428,026 
 Total mortgages payable1,695,408 1,597,397 
Unamortized debt issuance costs(8,218)(9,865)
Total mortgages payable, net of unamortized debt issuance costs$1,687,190 $1,587,532 
(1)Bears interest at one month LIBOR plus 160 bps.
(2)Bears interest at one month LIBOR plus 190 bps.
(3)Loan repaid in July 2021 in connection with the disposition of the property.
62

    Interest Rate at December 31, December 31,
(Amounts in thousands) Maturity December 31, 2019 2019 2018
First mortgages secured by:        
Variable rate        
Cherry Hill (Plaza at Cherry Hill)(1)
 5/24/2022 3.31% $28,930
 $28,930
Westfield (One Lincoln Plaza)(1)
 5/24/2022 3.31% 4,730
 4,730
Woodbridge (Plaza at Woodbridge)(1)
 5/25/2022 3.31% 55,340
 55,340
Jersey City (Hudson Commons)(2)
 11/15/2024 3.61% 29,000
 29,000
Watchung(2)
 11/15/2024 3.61% 27,000
 27,000
Bronx (1750-1780 Gun Hill Road)(2)
 12/1/2024 3.61% 24,500
 24,500
Total variable rate debt     169,500
 169,500
Fixed rate        
Montehiedra (senior loan) 7/6/2021 5.33% 83,202
 84,860
Montehiedra (junior loan) 7/6/2021 3.00% 30,000
 30,000
Bergen Town Center - West, Paramus 4/8/2023 3.56% 300,000
 300,000
Bronx (Shops at Bruckner) 5/1/2023 3.90% 10,978
 11,582
Jersey City (Hudson Mall)(5)
 12/1/2023 5.07% 23,625
 24,326
Yonkers Gateway Center(6)
 4/6/2024 4.16% 30,122
 31,704
Las Catalinas 8/6/2024 4.43% 129,335
 130,000
Brick 12/10/2024 3.87% 50,000
 50,000
North Plainfield 12/10/2025 3.99% 25,100
 25,100
Middletown 12/1/2026 3.78% 31,400
 31,400
Rockaway 12/1/2026 3.78% 27,800
 27,800
East Hanover (200 - 240 Route 10 West) 12/10/2026 4.03% 63,000
 63,000
North Bergen (Tonnelle Ave)(4)
 4/1/2027 4.18% 100,000
 100,000
Manchester 6/1/2027 4.32% 12,500
 12,500
Millburn 6/1/2027 3.97% 23,798
 24,000
Totowa 12/1/2027 4.33% 50,800
 50,800
Woodbridge (Woodbridge Commons) 12/1/2027 4.36% 22,100
 22,100
East Brunswick 12/6/2027 4.38% 63,000
 63,000
East Rutherford 1/6/2028 4.49% 23,000
 23,000
Hackensack 3/1/2028 4.36% 66,400
 66,400
Marlton 12/1/2028 3.86% 37,400
 37,400
East Hanover Warehouses 12/1/2028 4.09% 40,700
 40,700
Union (2445 Springfield Ave) 12/10/2028 4.01% 45,600
 45,600
Freeport (Freeport Commons) 12/10/2029 4.07% 43,100
 43,100
Garfield 12/1/2030 4.14% 40,300
 40,300
Mt Kisco(3)
 11/15/2034 6.40% 13,488
 13,987
Total fixed rate debt     1,386,748
 1,392,659
  Total mortgages payable 1,556,248
 1,562,159
  Unamortized debt issuance costs (10,053) (11,917)
Total mortgages payable, net of unamortized debt issuance costs $1,546,195
 $1,550,242
(1)

Bears interest at one month LIBOR plus 160 bps.
(2)
Bears interest at one month LIBOR plus 190 bps.
(3)
The mortgage payable balance on the loan secured by Mt Kisco includes $0.9 million and $1.0 million of unamortized debt discount as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The effective interest rate including amortization of the debt discount is 7.37% as of December 31, 2019.
(4)
On March 29, 2017, we refinanced the $74 million, 4.59% mortgage loan secured by our Tonnelle Commons property in North Bergen, NJ, increasing the principal balance to $100 million with a 10-year fixed rate mortgage, at 4.18%. As a result, we recognized a loss on


extinguishment of debt of $1.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, comprised of a $1.1 million prepayment penalty and write-off of $0.2 million of unamortized deferred financing fees on the original loan.
(5)
The mortgage payable balance on the loan secured by Hudson Mall includes $1.0 million and $1.2 million of unamortized debt premium as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The effective interest rate including amortization of the debt premium is 3.90% as of December 31, 2019.
(6)
The mortgage payable balance on the loan secured by Yonkers Gateway Center includes $0.6 million and $0.7 million of unamortized debt premium as of both December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The effective interest rate including amortization of the debt premium is 3.80% as of December 31, 2019.

The net carrying amount of real estate collateralizing the above indebtedness amounted to approximately $1.2$1.4 billion as of December 31, 2019.2021. Our mortgage loans contain covenants that limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness on these properties and in certain circumstances require lender approval of tenant leases and/or yield maintenance upon repayment prior to maturity. As of December 31, 2019,2021, we were in compliance with all debt covenants.

During 2017, our property in Englewood, NJ was transferred to a receiver. On January 31, 2018, our property in Englewood, NJ was sold at a foreclosure sale and on February 23, 2018, the court order was received approving the sale and discharging the receiver of all assets and liabilities related to the property. We recognized a gain on extinguishment of debt of $2.5 million as a result of the forgiveness of outstanding mortgage debt of $11.5 million, which is included in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2018.

As of December 31, 2019,2021, the principal repayments for the next five years and thereafter are as follows:
(Amounts in thousands) 
Year Ending December 31,
2022$98,915 
2023349,814 
2024163,721 
202540,946 
2026230,694 
Thereafter811,318 
(Amounts in thousands)  
Year Ending December 31,  
2020 $7,515
2021 122,628
2022 99,711
2023 344,367
2024 274,316
2025 32,306
Thereafter 675,405


Revolving Credit Agreement
On January 15, 2015, we entered into a $500 million Revolving Credit Agreement (the “Agreement”) with certain financial institutions. On March 7, 2017, we amended and extended the Agreement. The amendment increased the credit facility size by $100 million to $600 million and extended the maturity date to March 7, 2021 with 2 six-month extension options. On July 29, 2019, we entered into a second amendment to the Agreement to extend the maturity date to January 29, 2024 with two six-month extension options.

On June 3, 2020, we entered into a third amendment to the Agreement, which among other things, modifies certain definitions and the measurement period for certain financial covenants to a trailing four-quarter period instead of the most recent quarter period annualized. Company borrowings under the Agreement are subject to interest at LIBOR plus 1.05% to 1.50% and an annual facility fee of 15 to 30 basis points. Both the spread over LIBOR and the facility fee are based on our current leverage ratio and are subject to increase if our leverage ratio increases above predefined thresholds.change. The Agreement contains customary financial covenants including a maximum leverage ratio of 60% and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.5x. NaN

No amounts have beenwere drawn to dateor outstanding under the Agreement.Agreement as of December 31, 2021 and 2020. Financing feescosts associated with executing the Agreement of $3.9$2.2 million and $2.2$3.3 million as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, respectively, are included in deferred financing fees, net inthe prepaid expenses and other assets line item of the consolidated balance sheets.sheets, as deferred financing costs, net.

Mortgage on Las Catalinas Mall
In April 2020, we notified the servicer of the $129 million non-recourse mortgage loan on Las Catalinas Mall in Puerto Rico that cash flow would be insufficient to service the debt and that we were unwilling to fund the shortfalls. In December 2020, the non-recourse mortgage loan on Las Catalinas Mall was modified to convert the mortgage from an amortizing 4.43% loan to interest only payments, starting at 3.00% in 2021 and increasing 50 basis points annually until returning to 4.43% in 2024 and thereafter, and enables the Company, at its option, to repay the loan at a discounted value of $72.5 million, beginning in August 2023 through the extended maturity date of February 2026.

While it is possible we will be able to repay the loan at the discounted value in the future, it is contingent upon certain factors including the future operating performance of the property as well as the ability to meet all required payments on the loan. Therefore, in accordance with ASC 470-60 Troubled Debt Restructurings, the Company did not recognize a gain at the time of the restructuring, as the future cash payments, including contingent payments, are greater than the carrying value of the mortgage payable.

We have accrued interest of $5.4 million related to this mortgage, which is included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2021. We incurred $1.2 million of lender fees in connection with the loan modification which are treated as a reduction of the mortgage payable balance and amortized over the term of the loan in accordance with the provisions under ASC 470-60.

Mortgage on Woodmore Towne Centre
On December 23, 2021, the Company entered into a 10-year, $117.2 million non-recourse first mortgage to partially fund the acquisition of its property in Glenarden, MD. The mortgage is secured by the property with a fixed interest rate of 3.39% and is interest-only for the entire loan term.
66
63


Mortgage on The Outlets at Montehiedra
In connection with the refinancing of the loan secured by The Outlets at Montehiedra (“Montehiedra”) in the second quarter of 2020, the Company provided a $12.5 million limited corporate guarantee. The guarantee is reduced commensurate with the loan amortization schedule and will reduce to zero in approximately five years. As of December 31, 2021, the remaining exposure under the guarantee is $9.9 million. There was no separate liability recorded related to this guarantee.

7.INCOME TAXES
7.     INCOME TAXES

The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT under sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code, of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), commencing with the filing of its 2015 tax return for its tax year ended December 31, 2015. With the exception toof the Company’s taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”),TRS, to the extent the Company meets certain requirements under the Code, the Company will not be taxed on its federal taxable income. If we fail to qualify as a REIT for any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any alternative minimum tax, which, for corporations, was repealed under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”)TCJA for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for the four subsequent taxable years. In addition to its TRS, the Company is subject to certain foreign, and state and local income taxes, including a 29% non-resident withholding tax onin particular income taxes arising from its 2operating activities in Puerto Rico, malls, which are included in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income. The Company is also subject to certain other taxes, including state and local franchise taxes which are included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income.

On December 22, 2017, the TCJA was signed into law. The TCJA amends the Internal Revenue Code to reduce tax rates and modify policies, credits, and deductions for individuals and businesses. Effective January 1, 2018, for businesses, the TCJA reduces the corporate tax rate from a maximum of 35% to a flat 21% rate. Since UE has elected to qualify as a REIT under sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code with intent to distribute 100% of its taxable income and did not have any activities in a Taxable REIT Subsidiary (“TRS”) prior to January 1, 2018, there was no impact from the provisions of the TCJA to the Company’s financial statements.

The Company satisfied its REIT distribution requirementrequirement by distributing $0.88$0.60 per common share in 2019.2021, which comprised a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.15 per common share declared for each quarter of 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company declared a regular cash dividend of $0.22 per common share for the first quarter of 2020 and a special cash dividend of $0.46 per common share in December 2020. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company declared cash distributions on our common shares of $0.88 per share. The taxability of such dividends for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 are as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
202120202019
Dividend paid per share(1)
$0.60 $0.68 $0.88 
Ordinary income100 %100 %83 %
Return of capital— %— %— %
Capital gains— %— %17 %
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Dividend paid per share$0.88
 $0.88
 $0.88
Ordinary income83% 100% 58%
Return of capital% % %
Capital gains17% % 42%
(1) The special cash dividend of $0.46 per common share declared in December 2020, and paid in January 2021, was fully allocable to the 2020 tax year.


TheFor U.S. federal income tax purposes, the REIT and the other minority members are partners in the Operating Partnership. As such, the partners are required to report their share of taxable income on their respective tax returns.

On December 31, 2017, However, the Company elected, for tax purposes, to treat the wholly-owned limited partnership that held its Allentown property as a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”). A TRS is a corporation, other than a REIT, in which we directly or indirectly hold stock, which has made a joint election with us to be treated as a TRS under Section 856(l) of the Code. A TRS is required to pay regular U.S. federal income tax, and state and local income tax where applicable, as a non-REIT “C” corporation. The Allentown legal entity restructuring resulted in a capital gain recognized for tax purposes in 2017 and a step up in tax basis to the Allentown property resulting in no capital gains recognized for tax purposes in 2018 upon the property’s sale on April 26, 2018. The Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 reflect the TRS’ federal and state corporate income taxes associated with the operating activities at the TRS. The tax expense recorded in association with the operating activities of the TRS was $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2018, the Allentown TRS has been dissolved and as such, the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019 do not reflect any corporate income taxes associated with such TRS.
During the year ended December 31, 2019,maintains certain non-real estate operating activities non-qualifying forthat could not be performed by the REIT, purposes, commencedand occur through the Company’s operating TRS, and arewhich is subject to federal, state and local income taxes. These income taxes are included in the income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income.
Our 2
During the year ended December 31, 2021, the REIT was subject to Puerto Rico malls arecorporate income taxes on its allocable share of the Company’s Puerto Rico operating activities. The Puerto Rico corporate income tax consists of a flat 18.5% tax rate plus a graduated income surcharge tax for a maximum corporate income tax rate of 37.5%. In addition, the REIT is subject to a 29% non-resident withholding10% branch profits tax whichon the earnings and profits generated from its allocable share of the Company’s Puerto Rico operating activities and such tax is included in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income. Income before income taxes at our twoDuring the year ended December 31, 2020 the Company also had activities occurring in special partnerships subject to a Puerto Rico malls29% non-resident withholding tax on the net income from operating activities allocated to the Operating Partnership.

On June 1, 2020, the Company completed a mortgage refinancing of its mall in Puerto Rico, The Outlets at Montehiedra. The debt forgiven as a part of this refinancing resulted in a write-down to our Puerto Rico tax basis in the mall equal to such amount of debt forgiven and the recognition of a deferred tax liability on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, which amounted to $10.3 million.

On June 5, 2020 and December 11, 2020, the Company completed a legal entity restructuring of Montehiedra and Las Catalinas Mall, respectively. The legal entity restructurings resulted in a step up in our Puerto Rico tax basis in each mall and the recognition of a deferred tax asset on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, which amounted to $23.7 million for Montehiedra and $29.5 million for Las Catalinas Mall.
64


Together, the refinancing and legal entity restructuring transactions resulted in a net deferred tax asset of $42.9 million, which is included in prepaid expenses and other assets on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2020, and the Company recognized an accompanying Puerto Rico income tax benefit on the consolidated statements of income during the year ended December 31, 2019 was $9.4 million.2020.

As a result of the Montehiedra refinancing and the Las Catalinas Mall troubled debt restructuring, the Company recognized a gain on extinguishment of debt for U.S. federal income tax purposes and implemented various tax planning strategies to limit its impact on the Company’s overall U.S. federal taxable income. The Puerto Ricostrategies implemented resulted in the recognition of a state and local income tax expense recorded was $1.2 millionliability and $3.3 millioncorresponding deferred tax asset for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. ForREIT of $4.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2017,2020. During the Puerto Rico tax benefit recorded was $0.3 million. Both properties are held in a special partnership for Puerto Rico tax reporting purposes (the general partner being a qualified REIT subsidiary or “QRS”).

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred income taxes are recognized for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of taxable assets and liabilities.



Income tax expense (benefit) for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 consists2021, based on the filing of the following:2020 state and local income tax returns, this amount was reduced by $1.2 million due to the final taxable amount being lower than what was originally estimated.
 Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)2019 2018 2017
Income tax expense (benefit):     
Current:     
U.S. federal income tax$
 $154
 $
U.S. state and local income tax66
 101
 22
Puerto Rico income tax851
 560
 674
Total current917
 815
 696
Deferred:     
Puerto Rico income tax(1)
370
 2,704
 (974)
Total deferred370
 2,704
 (974)
Total income tax expense (benefit)$1,287
 $3,519
 $(278)

(1) Due to the effects of applying ASC 842 on January 1, 2019, deferred tax benefit of $0.8 million was recognized within a cumulative-effect adjustment to accumulated deficit to adjust reserves on receivables from straight-line rents. Refer to Note 36 to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information.
Provision for income taxes differs fromfurther information on the amounts computed by applyingMontehiedra refinancing and the statutory federal income tax rate to consolidated net income before income taxes as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)2019 2018 2017
Federal provision at statutory tax rate(1)
$24,672
 $25,301
 $25,431
Income before income taxes not subject to federal tax provision(24,677) (14,390) (25,431)
TRS permanent book to tax adjustments
 (10,740) 
State and local income tax provision, net of federal benefit66
 84
 22
Puerto Rico income tax provision1,221
 3,264
 (300)
Change in valuation allowance5
 
 
Total income tax expense (benefit)$1,287

$3,519

$(278)
Las Catalinas Mall troubled debt restructuring.
(1)
Federal statutory tax rate of 21% for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 and federal statutory tax rate of 35% for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Below is a table summarizing the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:
 Balance at
(Amounts in thousands)December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Deferred tax assets:   
Amortization of deferred financing costs$69
 $115
Credit losses related to operating lease receivables461
 522
Hurricane insurance claims receivable
 460
Charitable contribution5
 5
Net operating loss5
 
Valuation allowance(5) 
Total deferred tax assets535
 1,102
    
Deferred tax liabilities:   
Depreciation(4,416) (4,489)
Straight line rent(1,051) (1,920)
Amortization of acquired leases(205) (225)
Total deferred tax liabilities(5,672)
(6,634)
    
Net deferred tax liabilities$(5,137)
$(5,532)



A reduction of the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance is required if, based on the evidence available, it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. ForManagement’s determination of the ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which the underlying temporary differences become deductible. As of December 31, 2021, no valuation allowance has been recorded against the deferred tax assets that resulted from the legal entity restructurings of the Puerto Rico malls. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management determined it is more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will be realized.

During the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, the Company reducedrecorded a $4.5 million valuation allowance against the carrying amount of theREIT’s state and local deferred tax asset established from a net operating loss generated atdescribed above because management determined that it is not more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will be realized. As of December 31, 2021, the Company’s operating TRS. This determinationtotal deferred tax asset and valuation allowance attributable to the REIT’s state and local income tax liability decreased by $1.5 million to $3.0 million. The $1.5 million decrease is attributed to the $1.2 million reduction based on the operating TRS’ anticipated futurefinal taxable incomeamount being lower than what was originally estimated as discussed above and the reversal ofcurrent year movement in the deferred tax asset.temporary difference.

We recordaccount for uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC 740 Income Taxes on the basis of a two-step process whereby (i) we determine whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained on the basis of the technical merits of the position and (ii) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, we recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority. The Company has not recorded any uncertain tax positions for tax year 2019.authority.

The Operating Partnership is organized as a limited partnership and is generally not subject to federal income tax. Accordingly, no provision for federalIncome before income taxes has been reflectedfrom the Company’s operating activities in Puerto Rico during the accompanyingyears ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was $8.5 million and $26.4 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Puerto Rico income tax expense was $2.4 million and the REIT’s state and local income tax benefit was $1.2 million as compared to a Puerto Rico income tax benefit of $43.5 million and a REIT state and local income tax expense of $4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. Puerto Rico income tax expense of $1.2 million was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2019. Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax effect of temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of taxable assets and liabilities and for the tax effect of carried forward tax attributes such as net operating losses and tax credits.














65


Income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 consists of the following:
Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)202120202019
Income tax expense (benefit):
Current:
U.S. state and local income tax(1,228)4,525 66 
Puerto Rico income tax110 1,293 851 
Total current(1,118)5,818 917 
Deferred:
U.S. federal income tax(6)— 
Puerto Rico income tax(1)
2,252 (44,808)370 
Total deferred2,257 (44,814)370 
Total income tax expense (benefit)$1,139 $(38,996)$1,287 
(1) Due to the effects of applying ASC 842 on January 1, 2019, a deferred tax benefit of $0.8 million was recognized within a cumulative-effect adjustment to accumulated deficit to adjust reserves on receivables from straight-line rents during the year ended December 31, 2019. Refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements outsideincluded in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information.


Provision for income taxes differs from the amounts computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to consolidated net income before income taxes as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)202120202019
Federal provision at statutory tax rate(1)
$22,880 $12,338 $24,672 
REIT income before income taxes not subject to federal tax provision(22,875)(12,339)(24,677)
State and local income tax provision, net of federal benefit225 11 66 
Puerto Rico income tax provision2,362 (43,515)1,221 
Change in valuation allowance(1,453)4,509 
Total income tax expense (benefit)$1,139 $(38,996)$1,287 
(1) Federal statutory tax rate of 21% for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019.


Below is a table summarizing the Company’s TRS activities.deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2021 and 2020:

Balance at
(Amounts in thousands)December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Deferred tax assets:
Depreciation$40,793 $41,942 
Amortization of deferred financing costs860 1,105 
Rental revenue deemed uncollectible735 2,109 
Charitable contribution
Net operating loss1,425 107 
Valuation allowance(3,061)(4,514)
Total deferred tax assets40,759 40,756 
Deferred tax liabilities:
Mortgage liability(1,394)— 
Straight line rent(961)(738)
Amortization of acquired leases(205)(228)
Accrued interest expense(779)(113)
Total deferred tax liabilities(3,339)(1,079)
Net deferred tax assets$37,420 $39,677 
66


8.     LEASES

Leases as lessor
We have approximately 1,100900 operating leases at our retail shopping centers, malls and malls,industrial properties which generate rental income from tenants and operating cash flows for the Company. Our tenant base comprises a diverse group of merchants including department stores, supermarkets, discounters, entertainment offerings, health clubs, DIY stores, in-line specialty shops, restaurants and other food and beverage vendors and service providers. Tenant leases for under 10,000 sf generally have lease terms of 5 years or less. Tenant leases for 10,000 sf or more are considered anchor leases and generally have lease terms of 10 to 25 years, with one or more renewal options available upon expiration of the initial lease term. Contractual rent increases for the renewal options are often fixed at the time of the initial lease agreement which may result in tenants being able to exercise their renewal options at amounts that are less than the fair value of the rent at the date of renewal.

The components of rental revenue for the yearyears ended December 31, 20192021 and 2020 were as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
 (Amounts in thousands)
20212020
Rental Revenue
Fixed lease revenue$318,585 $235,488 
Variable lease revenue103,882 92,792 
Total rental revenue$422,467 $328,280 
 (Amounts in thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2019
Rental Revenue 
Fixed lease revenue$274,397
Variable lease revenue110,008
Total rental revenue$384,405


Property, plant and equipment under operating leases as lessor
As of December 31, 20192021 and 2020, substantially all of the Company’s real estate assets are subject to operating leases.

Maturity analysis of lease payments as lessor
The Company’s operating leases,including those with revenue recognized on a cash basis, are disclosed in the aggregate due to their consistent nature as real estate leases. As of December 31, 20192021, the undiscounted cash flows to be received from lease payments of our operating leases on an annual basis for the next five years and thereafter are as follows:
(Amounts in thousands) 
Year Ending December 31,
2022$258,992 
2023247,248 
2024216,275 
2025192,115 
2026171,170 
Thereafter748,432 
Total undiscounted cash flows
$1,834,232 
(Amounts in thousands)  
Year Ending December 31,  
2020 $259,487
2021 242,651
2022 225,251
2023 201,736
2024 167,281
2025 142,947
Thereafter 757,446
Total undiscounted cash flows
 $1,996,799



As of December 31, 2018, future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases, under ASC 840 as lessor, was as follows:
(Amounts in thousands)  
Year Ending December 31,  
2019 $256,598
2020 235,652
2021 216,247
2022 198,449
2023 176,282
Thereafter 986,865

These future minimum amounts do not include additional rents based on a percentage of tenants’ sales and tenant expense reimbursements. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, rental revenue from percentage rent was $2.0 million and $1.2 million, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, rental revenue from tenant expense reimbursements was $108.7 million and $99.1 million, respectively.

Leases as lessee
As of December 31, 2019,2021, the Company had 2120 properties in its portfolio either completely or partially on land or in a building that was owned by third parties. These properties are leased or subleased to us pursuant to ground leases, building leases or easements, with remaining terms ranging from less than two yearsone to over 8078 years and provide us the right to operate the property. We also lease or sublease real estate for our 3 corporate offices with remaining terms of less than one year.
During the year endedOn December 31, 2019, the Company reassessed the lease term of 1 of its ground leases due to a change in circumstances in our election to renew the ground lease. As a result of this reassessment, the Company remeasured the lease liability by using revised inputs as of the reassessment date and recorded an additional ROU asset and lease liability of $5.0 million, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company sold its lessee position in 1 of its operating ground leases for $6.9 million, net of selling costs, and derecognized the lease’s ROU asset and corresponding lease liability. We recognized a gain on sale of lease of $1.8 million on our consolidated statements of income during the year ended December 31, 2019 as a result of the sale. Additionally, on July 31, 2019, the Company’s lessee position in 1 of its ground leases expired in accordance with the terms of the lease.
Additionally, on November 1, 20192020, the Company recognized a finance$5.7 million of operating lease ROU assetassets and finance$0.7 million of corresponding operating lease liability of $2.7 million and $3.0 million, respectively,liabilities in connection with the Company’s acquisition of Sunrise Mall, which included the acquisition of the lessee positionpositions of a ground lease. The Company assessed the lease classification as a finance lease due to the Company’s reasonably certain likelihood of exercising its option to purchase the lease. The finance lease ROU asset is included within prepaid expenses and other assets on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2019 and the finance lease liability is included within accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2019.leases.







67


The components of lease expense for the yearyears ended December 31, 20192021 and 2020 were as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2019
(Amounts in thousands)
20212020
Lease expense Lease expense
Operating lease cost(1)
$11,730
Operating lease cost(1)
$10,162 $10,875 
Variable lease cost2,736
Variable lease cost2,710 2,792 
Total lease expense$14,466
Total lease expense$12,872 $13,667 
(1) During the yearyears ended December 31, 2019,2021 and 2020, the Company recognized sublease income of $19.7$19.1 million and $17.7 million, respectively, included in rental revenue on the consolidated statementstatements of income in relation to certain ground and building lease arrangements. Operating lease cost includes amortization of below-market ground lease intangibles and straight-line lease expense.

In addition, the Company recognized finance lease cost of under $0.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, included in interest and debt expense on the consolidated statements of income.






Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2020 was as follows:
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Supplemental noncash informationOperating leasesFinance leaseOperating leasesFinance lease
Weighted-average remaining lease term14.8 years34.2 years15.7 years35.2 years
Weighted-average discount rates3.98 %4.01 %3.99 %4.01 %
 December 31, 2019
Supplemental noncash informationOperating leases Finance lease
Weighted-average remaining lease term15.3 years
 36.2 years
Weighted-average discount rates4.03% 4.01%


Supplemental cash information related to leases for the yearyears ended December 31, 20192021 and 2020 was as follows:
 (Amounts in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:20212020
Operating cash flows from operating leases$9,584 $10,033 
Operating cash flows from finance lease120 120 
Financing cash flows from finance lease11 11 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities:
Operating leases$772 $1,740 
 (Amounts in thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2019
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:

 
Operating cash flows from operating leases$10,698
Operating cash flows from finance lease10
Financing cash flows from finance lease8
  
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities: 
Operating leases98,980
Finance lease2,991


Maturity analysis of lease payments as lessee

The undiscounted cash flows to be paid on an annual basis for the next five years and thereafter are presented in the table below. The total amount of lease payments, on an undiscounted basis, are reconciled to the lease liability on the consolidated balance sheet by considering the present value discount.
(Amounts in thousands)OperatingFinance
Year Ending December 31,leaseslease
2022$9,089 $109 
20238,212 109 
20248,225 109 
20256,324 109 
20266,092 124 
Thereafter51,409 6,299 
Total undiscounted cash flows89,351 6,859 
Present value discount(24,773)(3,855)
Discounted cash flows$64,578 $3,004 
(Amounts in thousands) Operating Finance
Year Ending December 31, leases lease
2020 $9,235
 $109
2021 8,647
 109
2022 8,666
 109
2023 8,466
 109
2024 8,470
 109
2025 6,568
 109
Thereafter 62,551
 6,424
Total undiscounted cash flows 112,603

7,078
Present value discount (32,690) (4,096)
Discounted cash flows $79,913

$2,982


As of December 31, 2018, future lease payments under operating lease agreements, including extension options if reasonably assured of being exercised, under ASC 840 as lessee, were as follows:
(Amounts in thousands)  
Year Ending December 31,  
2019 $10,640
2020 9,614
2021 8,957
2022 8,982
2023 8,850
Thereafter 85,535





71
68




9.     FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
 
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures defines fair value and establishes a framework for measuring fair value. The objective of fair value is to determine the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (the exit price). ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three levels: Level 1 - quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities; Level 2 - observable prices based on inputs not quoted in active markets, but corroborated by market data; and Level 3 - unobservable inputs used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. In determining fair value, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible as well as consider counterparty credit risk in our assessment of fair value.
 
Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring or Non-Recurring Basis
There were no financial assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018.2020.

Financial Assets and Liabilities not Measured at Fair Value
Financial assets and liabilities that are not measured at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets include cash and cash equivalents and mortgages payable. Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. The fair value of mortgages payable is calculated based on current market prices and discounted cash flows at the current rate at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings for the remaining term of such debt.debt, which is provided by a third-party specialist. The fair value of cash and cash equivalents isare classified as Level 1 and the fair value of mortgages payable is classified as Level 2. The table below summarizes the carrying amounts and fair value of these financial instruments as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018.2020.
  As of December 31, 2019 As of December 31, 2018
(Amounts in thousands) Carrying Amount Fair Value Carrying Amount Fair Value
Assets:  
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents $432,954
 $432,954
 $440,430
 $440,430
Liabilities:  
  
  
  
Mortgages payable(1)
 $1,556,248
 $1,590,503
 $1,562,159
 $1,543,963

 As of December 31, 2021As of As of December 31, 2020
(Amounts in thousands)Carrying AmountFair ValueCarrying AmountFair Value
Liabilities:    
Mortgages payable(1)
$1,695,408 $1,692,674 $1,597,397 $1,611,868 
(1) Carrying amounts exclude unamortized debt issuance costs of $10.1$8.2 million and $11.9$9.9 million as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, respectively.

Nonfinancial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
We assess the carrying value of our properties for impairment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Such events and changes include macroeconomic conditions, including those caused by global pandemics, such as COVID-19, which may result in property operational disruption and indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recognized impairment charges on 2 retail properties that the Company was actively marketing. The Company recognized an impairment charge of $0.4 million on its property in Westfield, NJ which was sold on July 22, 2021. Additionally, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $0.1 million on its ground lease in Vallejo, CA which was sold on December 21, 2021. Prior to these dispositions, the carrying value of these assets exceeded the estimated fair value less costs to sell. The aggregated fair values of $7.9 million were based on sale agreements under negotiation with third-party buyers.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $3.1 million on a parcel of our property in Lodi, NJ, which was sold on January 8, 2021. Prior to the sale of the parcel, the carrying value of this property exceeded its estimated fair value less costs to sell of $7.2 million. The fair value of the parcel was based on a sale agreement under negotiation with a third-party buyer.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recognized impairment charges of $26.3 million on 4 retail properties that the Company iswas actively marketing. The impairment loss was calculated as the difference between the assets’ individual carrying values and the estimated aggregated fair values of $38.5 million, less estimated selling costs. The valuation of these properties were based on capitalization rates, discounted future cash flows, third-party appraisals, broker selling estimates and sale agreements under negotiations. The capitalization rates (ranging from 9.9% to 12.1%) and discounts rates (ranging from 9.3% to 10.8%) utilized in the analyses were based upon unobservable rates that the Company believes to be in a reasonable range of current market rates.

69

During the year ended December 31, 2018, we recognized a $3.1 million impairment charge on our property in Salem, NH as a result of the loss of the anchor tenant at the property. The valuation of our property in Salem, NH was based on comparable property transactions in the property’s surrounding area. We also recognized a $2.5 million impairment charge on our property in West Babylon, NY. The fair value for our property in West Babylon, NY was based on an executed letter of intent with a third-party buyer less costs to sell.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we recognized a $3.5 million impairment charge on our property in Eatontown, NJ. Our determination of fair value was based on the executed contract of sale with the third-party buyer.

The Company believes the inputs utilized to measure these fair values were reasonable in the context of applicable market conditions, however due to the significance of the unobservable inputs in the overall fair value measures, including market conditions and expectations for growth, the Company determined that such fair value measurements are classified as Level 3.



Aggregate impairment charges of $26.3$0.5 million, $5.6$3.1 million and $3.5$26.3 million, respectively, are included as an expense within casualty and impairment loss, net on our consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017.2019.

10.     COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
 
Legal Matters
There are various legal actions against us in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, the outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Redevelopment
As of December 31, 2019, we had approximately $65.6 million ofRedevelopment and Anchor Repositioning
The Company has 21 active development, redevelopment andor anchor repositioning projects underway,with total estimated costs of $218.7 million, of which $29.9$72.1 million has been incurred and $146.6 million remains to be funded. Basedfunded as of December 31, 2021. We continue to monitor the stabilization dates of these projects as a result of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on current plansour tenants, vendors and estimates,supply chains. We have identified future projects in our development pipeline, but we anticipate the remaining amounts will be expended over the next two years.are under no obligation to execute and fund any of these projects and each of these projects is being further evaluated based on market conditions.

Insurance 
The Company maintains (i)numerous insurance policies including for general liability, insurance with limitsproperty, pollution, acts of $200 million for properties in the U.S.terrorism, trustees’ and Puerto Ricoofficers’, cyber, workers’ compensation and (ii) all-risk property insurance with limits of $500 million per occurrence and in the aggregate for properties in the U.S. and $139 million for properties in Puerto Rico,automobile-related liabilities. However, all such policies are subject to the terms, conditions, exclusions, deductibles and sub-limits, when applicable for certain perils such as floods and earthquakes and (iii) numerousamount other insurance policies including trustees’ and officers’ insurance, workers’ compensation and automobile-related liabilities insurance. Thelimiting factors. For example, the Company’s insurance includes coverage for acts of terrorism butinsurance excludes coverage for nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological terrorism events as defined by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act,Act.
The Company’s primary and excess insurance policies providing coverage for pollution related losses have an aggregate limit of $75 million and provide remediation and business interruption coverage for pollution incidents, which expires inpursuant to our policies expressly include the presence and dispersal of viruses. On December 2020. In addition,23, 2020, the Company maintains coverage for certain cybersecurity losses providing firstinitiated litigation in New Jersey state court, Bergen County, under these policies to recover uncollected rents and third-party coverage including network interruption, event management, cyber extortion and claims for media content, security and privacy liability. other amounts resulting from the COVID-19 virus.
Insurance premiums are typically charged directly to each of the retail properties and warehouses but not all of the cost of such premiums are recovered. The Company is responsible for deductibles, losses in excess of insurance coverage, and the portion of premiums not reimbursable by tenants at our properties, which could be material.
We continue to monitor the state of the insurance market and the scope and costs of available coverage. We cannot anticipate what coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in the future and expect premiums across most coverage lines to increase in light of recent events. The incurrence of uninsured losses, costs or uncovered premiums could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Certain of our loans and other agreements contain customary covenants requiring the maintenance of insurance coverage. Although we believe that we currently have adequate insurance coverage for purposes of these agreements, we may not be able to obtain an equivalent amount of coverage at reasonable costs in the future. If lenders or other counterparties insist on greater coverage than we are able to obtain, such requirement could materially and adversely affect our ability to finance our properties and expand our portfolio.

Tornado-Related Charges 
On June 13, 2018, a tornado hit our shopping center in Wilkes-Barre, PA, damaging approximately 13% of the property’s gross leasable area. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company settled the related insurance claim with its carrier for $5.5 million. Of this amount, the Company recognized $4.8 million as a casualty gain during the year ended December 31, 2019 included in casualty and impairment loss, net on the accompanying consolidated statements of income. As part of the settlement, the Company recognized $0.3 million as business interruption proceeds within rental revenue during the year ended December 31, 2019.


70


Hurricane-Related Charges
On September 20, 2017, Hurricane Maria made landfall, damaging our 2 properties in Puerto Rico. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company incurred a $2.2 million charge reflecting the net book value of assets damaged and incurred $1.7 million of hurricane-related expenses, included in casualty and impairment loss, net on the accompanying consolidated statements of income. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recognized $2.2 million of business interruption losses, net of $1.8 million in cash advances received from its insurance carrier. Losses of $0.9 million pertained to rent abatements when the malls were closed or inoperable as a result of the hurricane, recorded as a reduction of rental revenue, and $1.3 million was recorded within property operating expenses to provision for doubtful accounts for unpaid rents.



During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company received $1.5 million in casualty insurance proceeds, which were partially offset by $0.3 million of hurricane-related costs, resulting in net casualty gains of $1.2 million included in casualty and impairment loss, net on the accompanying consolidated statements of income. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recognized $0.3 million of business interruption losses, comprised of $0.7 million of rent abatements due to tenants that had not reopened since the hurricane, recorded as a reduction of rental revenue, offset by a $0.4 million reversal within property operating expenses to provision for doubtful accounts for payments received from tenants on rents previously reserved.

In June 2019, the Company finalized its insurance recovery related to Hurricane Maria with its carrier atin the amount of $14.3 million, of which $3.3 million was previously received, subject to deductibles of $2.3 million. We recognized an $8.7 million casualty gain during the year ended December 31, 2019 as a result of the remaining insurance proceeds from the settlement agreement for our 2 malls in Puerto Rico.

Environmental Matters
Each of our properties has been subjected to varying degrees of environmental assessment at various times. Based on these assessments, we have accrued costs of $2.7$1.7 million and $1.7$1.8 million on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, respectively, for remediation costs for environmental contamination at certain properties. While this accrual reflects third-partyour best estimates of the potential costs of remediation at these properties, there can be no assurance that the actual costs will not exceed these amounts. During the year ended December 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, the Company recognized $1.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of environmental remediation costs included in property operating expenses on the consolidated statements of income. Although we are not aware of any other material environmental contamination, there can be no assurance that the identification of new areas of contamination, changes in the extent or known scope of contamination, the discovery of additional sites, or changes in cleanup requirements would not result in significant costs to us.

Bankruptcies
Although our rental revenue is supported by long-term leases, leases may be rejected in a bankruptcy proceeding and the related tenant stores may permanently vacate prior to lease expiration. In the event a tenant with a significant number of leases or square footage in our shopping centers files for bankruptcy and rejects its leases with us, we could experience a reduction in our revenues. We monitor the operating performance and rent collections of all tenants in our shopping centers, especially those tenants in arrears or operating retail formats that are experiencing significant changes in competition, business practice, or store closings in other locations.

During Given the year ended December 31, 2018, Toys “R” Us, Sears, Fallas,economic environment brought upon by COVID-19, certain tenants experienced liquidity or financial hardships and National Wholesale Liquidators filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

During September 2017, Toys “R” Us filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code and announced an orderly wind-down of its U.S. business and liquidation of all U.S. stores on March 15, 2018. Prior to the liquidation, the Company had leases with Toys “R” Us at 9 locations with annual rental revenue of $7.6 million. In connection with the Toys “R” Us bankruptcy, the Company recognized a write-off of $21.6 million of below-market intangible liabilities (classified within rental revenue), $15.5 million of lease termination payments (classified within property operating expense) and a $1.0 million write-off of reserves on receivables from straight-line rents in the year ended December 31, 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company received $1.2 million of bankruptcy settlement income in connection with the bankruptcy proceedings of Toys "R" Us. The settlement proceeds were used to offset outstanding credit losses and the remaining proceeds were recorded to other income. No determination has been made as to the amount or timing of additional bankruptcy settlement proceeds, if any, that may be received.

Fallas filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on August 6, 2018. Priorsince the pandemic was declared. Although some of these tenants intend to exit the tenant vacating, the Company had 1 lease with Fallas at the Shops at Bruckner in the Bronx, NY comprising approximately 38,000 sf which generated $1.4 million in annual rental revenue. In connection with the bankruptcy, the Company recognized a write-off of $0.8 million of below-market intangible liabilities (classified within rental revenue) in the year ended December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2019, the Company executed a lease with LA Fitness for this space.

Sears filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on October 15, 2018. The Company had 4 Kmart leases with Sears comprising approximately 547,000 sf, which generated $8.5 million in annual rental revenue. Property rents were paid on all 4 Kmart locations through April 2019. In April 2019, our Kmart leases at Las Catalinasprocess and Huntington, NY were rejectedresume operations, the outcomes of such proceedings are unknown and we recognized a $7.4 million write-off of the below-market intangible liability connected with the lease in Huntington, NY (classified within rental revenues). ESL assumed the Company’s remaining 2 Kmart leases at Montehiedra and at Bruckner Commons. In January 2020 the Company executed a lease with ShopRiteis currently exploring leasing alternatives for its former Kmart space in Huntington, NY.these spaces.



National Wholesale Liquidators filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on October 24, 2018. The Company had 1 lease with National Wholesale Liquidators in Lodi, NJ comprising approximately 171,000 sf, which generated $3.1 million in annual rental revenue. This lease was rejected and returned to us on November 30, 2018. In connection with the bankruptcy, the Company recorded a $0.8 million write-off of reserves on receivables from straight-line rents in the year ended December 31, 2018. The Company is in active negotiations to lease this property.

11.     PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER ASSETS

The following is a summary of the composition of the prepaid expenses and other assets in the consolidated balance sheets:
Balance at
(Amounts in thousands)December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Other assets$19,712 $5,953 
Deferred tax asset, net37,420 39,677 
Real estate held for sale— 7,056 
Finance lease right-of-use asset2,724 2,724 
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $5,932 and $4,819, respectively2,234 3,347 
Prepaid expenses:
Real estate taxes9,982 8,093 
Insurance1,088 1,583 
Rent, licenses/fees951 1,878 
Total Prepaid expenses and other assets$74,111 $70,311 
 Balance at
(Amounts in thousands)December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Other assets$7,460
 $2,615
Real estate held for sale6,574
 
Deposits for acquisitions10,000
 150
Prepaid expenses:   
Real estate taxes6,491
 6,911
Insurance1,520
 2,509
Rent, licenses/fees1,655
 783
Total Prepaid expenses and other assets$33,700
 $12,968










71


12.     ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER LIABILITIES

The following is a summary of the composition of accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets:
Balance at
(Amounts in thousands)December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Dividend payable$— $55,905 
Deferred tenant revenue28,898 26,594 
Accrued capital expenditures and leasing costs19,164 7,797 
Finance lease liability3,004 2,993 
Accrued interest payable9,879 11,095 
Security deposits6,693 5,884 
Accrued payroll expenses9,134 5,797 
Other liabilities and accrued expenses8,057 16,915 
Total accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities$84,829 $132,980 
 Balance at
(Amounts in thousands)December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Deferred tenant revenue$26,224
 $28,697
Accrued capital expenditures and leasing costs7,893
 29,754
Accrued interest payable9,729
 8,950
Security deposits5,814
 5,396
Deferred tax liability, net5,137
 5,532
Accrued payroll expenses5,851
 5,747
Other liabilities and accrued expenses15,996
 14,441
Total accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities$76,644

$98,517


13.     INTEREST AND DEBT EXPENSE
 
The following table sets forth the details of interest and debt expense:
 Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)202120202019
Interest expense$54,946 $68,184 $63,783 
Amortization of deferred financing costs2,992 2,831 2,856 
Total Interest and debt expense$57,938 $71,015 $66,639 
 Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)2019 2018 2017
Interest expense$63,783
 $61,989
 $53,342
Amortization of deferred financing costs2,856
 2,879
 2,876
Total Interest and debt expense$66,639

$64,868
 $56,218


75



14.     EQUITY AND NONCONTROLLING INTEREST

At-The-Market Program
In 2016,On May 5, 2021 the Company established an at-the-market (“ATM”) equity program (the “ATM Program”), pursuant to which the Company couldmay offer and sell from time to time its common shares, par value $0.01 per share, with an aggregate gross sales price of up to $250.0 million through a consortium of broker dealers acting as sales agents. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, 0 common shares were issued$250 million. Sales under the ATM equity program.Program may be made from time to time, as needed, by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions or other transactions that are deemed to be “at the market” offerings, in privately negotiated transactions, which may include block trades, or as otherwise agreed with the sales agents.
As of December 31, 2021, the Company has not issued any common shares under the ATM Program. Future sales will depend on a variety of factors including, but not limited to, market conditions, the trading price of our common shares, and our capital needs. The Company’s ATM program expired in August 2019. We hadCompany has no obligation to sell the remainingany shares available under the ATM equity program.Program.

Share Repurchase Program
In March 2020, the Company’s Board of Trustees authorized a share repurchase program for up to $200 million of the Company’s common shares. Under the program, the Company may repurchase its shares from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions in compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-18. The amount and timing of the purchases will depend on a number of factors including the price and availability of the Company’s shares, trading volume and general market conditions. The share repurchase program does not obligate the Company to acquire any particular amount of common shares and may be suspended or discontinued at any time at the Company’s discretion.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, no shares were repurchased by the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company repurchased 5.9 million shares at a weighted average share price of $9.22 amounting to $54.1 million.



72


Units of the Operating Partnership
An equivalent number of common units were issued by the Operating Partnership to the Company in connection with the Company’s issuance of common shares of beneficial interest under the ATM equity program.
The Operating Partnership’s capital includes general and common limited partnership interests in the operating partnership (“OP Units”). As of December 31, 2019,2021, Urban Edge owned approximately 95.4%96.2% of the outstanding common OP Units with the remaining limited OP Units held by members of management, Urban Edge’s Board of Trustees and contributors of property interests acquired. Urban Edge serves as the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. The third-party unitholders have limited rights over the Operating Partnership such that they do not have characteristics of a controlling financial interest. As such, the Operating Partnership is considered a VIE, and the Company is the primary beneficiary which consolidates it. The Company’s only investment is the Operating Partnership. The VIE’s assets can be used for purposes other than the settlement of the VIE’s obligations and the Company’s partnership interest is considered a majority voting interest.

Dividends and Distributions
During the yearsyear ended December 31, 2021 the Company declared distributions on our common shares and OP units of $0.60 per share/unit which comprised a regular quarterly dividend of $0.15 per common share and OP unit declared for each quarter of 2021.
During the year ended December 31, 2020 the Company declared distributions on our common shares and OP units of $0.68 per share/unit in the aggregate, which comprised a regular quarterly dividend of $0.22 per common share and OP unit declared for the first quarter of 2020 and a special cash dividend of $0.46 per common share and OP unit declared in December 2020 and paid on January 19, 2021. As a result of COVID-19 and the uncertainties it generated, the Company temporarily suspended quarterly dividend distributions for the second and third quarters of 2020.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, and 2018, the Company declared distributions on our common stock dividendsshares and OP unit distributionsunits of $0.88 per share/unit in the aggregate.
We have a Dividend Reinvestment Plan (the “DRIP”), whereby shareholders may use their dividends to purchase shares. During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, 4,442, 3,445 and 2018, 6,920 and 8,419 shares were issued under the DRIP, respectively.

Noncontrolling Interests in Operating Partnership
Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership reflected on the consolidated balance sheets of the Company are comprised of OP units and limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership in the form of LTIP unit awards. LTIP unit awards were granted to certain executives pursuant to our 2015 Omnibus Share Plan (the “Omnibus Share Plan”) and our 2018 Inducement Equity Plan (the “Inducement Plan”). OP units were issued to contributors in exchange for their property interests in connection with the Company’s property acquisitions in 2017.
The total of the OP units and LTIP units represent a 5.8%4.1% weighted-average interest in the Operating Partnership for the year ended December 31, 2019.2021. Holders of outstanding vested LTIP units may, from and after two years from the date of issuance, redeem their LTIP units for cash, or for the Company’s common shares on a 1-for-one basis, solely at our election. Holders of outstanding OP units may redeem their units for cash or the Company’s common shares on a 1-for-one basis, solely at our election. On August 5, 2019, the Company received requests from certain holders of OP units to redeem 357,998 units. The Company elected to satisfy the redemption requests by repurchasing the units at a price of $16.70 per unit, for total cash consideration of $6.0 million. During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, 100,000, 1,355,836 and 6,995,941 units, respectively, were redeemed for an equivalent amount of common shares of the Company.
In connection with the separation from Vornado Realty L.P. (“VRLP”), the Company issued 5.7 million OP units, which represented a 5.4% interest in the Operating Partnership, to VRLP in exchange for interests in VRLP properties contributed by VRLP. On February 28, 2019, the Company issued 5.7 million common shares to VRLP, in exchange for an equal number of OP units after receiving a notice of redemption from VRLP. The issuance is exempt from registration in reliance upon Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on the basis that no public offering was made.

Noncontrolling InterestInterests in Consolidated Subsidiaries
The Company’s noncontrolling interest relatesinterests relate to the 5% interest held by others in our property in Walnut Creek, CA (Mount Diablo). The and 17.5% held by others in our property in Massapequa, NY. The net income attributable to noncontrolling interestinterests is presented separately in our consolidated statements of income.





76
73




15.     SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

Omnibus Share Plan
On January 7, 2015 our board and initial shareholder approved the Urban Edge Properties Omnibus Share Plan, under which awards may be granted up to a maximum of 15,000,000 of our common shares or share equivalents. Pursuant to the Omnibus Share Plan, stock options, LTIP units, operating partnership units and restricted shares were granted.

Outperformance and Long-Term Incentive Plans
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees of the Company approved the Company’s 2015 Outperformance Plan (“2015 OPP”) on November 3, 2015 and the Company’s 2017 Outperformance Plan (“2017 OPP”) on February 24, 2017. Both Outperformance Plans are multi-year, performance-based equity compensation plans under which participants, including our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, have the opportunity to earn awards in the form of LTIP units if, and only if, we outperform a predetermined total shareholder return (“TSR”) and/or outperform the market with respect to a relative TSR over the three-year period beginning on the date the respective plan was approved. The aggregate notional amounts of the 2015 OPP grant and the 2017 OPP grant are $10.2 million and $12.0 million, respectively.
Awards under the 2015 OPP and the 2017 OPP may be earned if we (i) achieve a TSR level greater than 7% per annum, or 21% over the three-year performance measurement period (the “Performance Period”), and/or (ii) achieve a TSR equal to or above, that of the 50th percentile of a retail REIT peer group (“Peer Group”) comprised of our peer companies, over a three-year performance measurement period.Performance Period. Distributions on awards accrue during the measurement period, except that 10% of such distributions are paid in cash. If the designated performance objectives are achieved, LTIP units are also subject to time-based vesting requirements. Awards earned under the 2015 OPP and the 2017 OPP vest 50% in year three, 25% in year four and 25% in year five.
On February 22, 2018, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees approved the Company’s 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“2018 LTI Plan”) under the Omnibus Share Plan, a multi-year equity compensation program, comprised of both performance-based and time-based vesting awards. Equity awards granted under the 2018 LTI Plan are weighted, in terms of grant date and fair value, 80% performance-based and 20% time-based.
The fair values of the 2015 OPP, and the 2017 OPP and the 2018 LTI Plan on the dates of grant were $3.9 million, $4.1 million and $4.1$3.6 million, respectively. A Monte Carlo simulation was used to estimate the fair values based on the probability of satisfying the market conditions and the projected share prices at the time of payments, discounted to the valuation dates over the three-year performance periods. For the 2015 OPP, assumptions include historical volatility (25.0%), risk-free interest rates (1.2%), and historical daily return as compared to our Peer Group (which ranged from 19.0% to 27.0%). For the 2017 OPP, assumptions include historical volatility (19.7%), risk-free interest rates (1.5%), and historical daily return as compared to our Peer Group. For boththe 2018 LTI Plan, assumptions include historical volatility, risk-free interest rates, and historical daily return as compared to our Peer Group. For the 2015 OPP and 2017 OPP, and the performance-based portion of the 2018 LTI Plan plans, such amounts are being amortized into share-based compensation expense over a five-year period from the dates of grant, using graded vesting attribution models.
The 2015 OPP was fully vested as of November 5, 2020 and there is no compensation cost remaining as of December 31, 2021. In the years ending December 31, 2019, 2018,2021, 2020, and 20172019 we recognized $1.4$0.7 million, $1.7$1.6 million and $2.0$2.3 million of compensation expense related to the 2015 OPP, 2017 OPP and 2017 OPPs’ LTIP Units,2018 LTI Plan, respectively. As of December 31, 2019,2021, there was $0.8$0.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the 20152017 OPP and 2017 OPPs’ LTIP Units,2018 LTI Plan, which will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.8 years.

2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan
On February 22, 2018, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees of the Company approved the Company’s 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan ("2018 LTI Plan") under the Omnibus Share Plan, a multi-year equity compensation program, comprised of both performance-based and time-based vesting awards. Equity awards granted under the 2018 LTI Plan are weighted, in terms of grant date and fair value, 80% performance-based and 20% time-based.
For the performance-based awards under the 2018 LTI Plan, participants have the opportunity to earn awards in the form of LTIP Units if, and only if, Urban Edge’s absolute and/or relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) meets certain criteria over the three-year performance measurement period (the “Performance Period”) beginning on February 22, 2018 and ending on February 21, 2021. The Company issued 328,107 LTIP Units under the 2018 LTI Plan.less than one year.
Under the Absolute TSR component (25% of the performance-based awards), 40% of the LTIP Units will be earned if the Company’s TSR over the Performance Period is equal to 18%, 100% of the LTIP Units will be earned if the Company’s TSR over the Performance Period is equal to 27%, and 165% of the LTIP Units will be earned if the Company’s TSR over the Performance Period is equal to or greater than 36%. The Relative TSR component is based on the Company’s performance compared to a peer group comprised of 14 companies. Under the Relative TSR Component (75% of the performance-based awards), 40% of the LTIP Units will be earned if the Company’s TSR over the Performance Period is equal to the 35
th percentile of the peer group, 100% of the LTIP Units will be earned if the Company’s TSR over the Performance Period is equal to the 55th percentile of the peer group, and 165% of the LTIP Units will be earned if the Company’s TSR over the Performance Period is equal to or above the 75th percentile of the peer group, with earning determined using linear interpolation if between such relative TSR thresholds.
The fair value of the performance-based award portion of the 2018 LTI Plan on the date of grant was $3.6 million using a Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the fair value through a risk-neutral premise. The time-based awards under the 2018 LTI Plan, also granted in the form of LTIP Units, vest ratably over three years except in the case of our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, where the vesting is ratably over four years. The Company granted time-based awards under the 2018 LTI Plan that represent


33,172 LTIP units with a grant date fair value of $0.7 million. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, we recognized $0.9 million and $1.0 million of compensation expense related to the 2018 LTI Plan.
2018 Inducement Equity Plan
The Inducement Plan was approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees of the Company on September 26, 2018. Under the Inducement Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees may grant, subject to any Company performance conditions as specified by the Compensation Committee, awards to individuals who were not previously employees as an inducement material to the individual’s entry into employment with the Company. The terms and conditions of the Inducement Plan and any awards thereunder granted are substantially similar to those under the 2015 Omnibus Share Plan. The Company has granted an aggregate of 352,890 restricted LTIP Units and 2,000,000 stock options under the Inducement Plan with grant date fair values of $7.2 million and $9.3 million, respectively, which were granted in connection with inducing the Company’s new Chief Operating Officer and new President of Development to join the Company.respectively.




74


2019 Long-Term Incentive Plan

On April 4, 2019, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees of the Company approved the Company’s 2019 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“2019 LTI Plan”). The Plan is a multi-year, equity compensation program under which participants, including our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, have the opportunity to earn awards in the form of LTIP units that vest based on the passage of time (one-third of the program) and performance goals tied to our relative and absolute total shareholder return (“TSR”)TSR during the three-year performance period following their grant (two-thirds of the program).

Performance-based awards
For the performance-based awards under the 2019 LTI Plan, participants have the opportunity to earn awards in the form of LTIP Units if, and only if, Urban Edge’s absolute and/or relative TSR meets certain criteria over the three-year performance measurement period (the “Performance Period”)Performance Period beginning on February 27, 2019 and ending on February 26, 2022. The Company issued 489,319 LTIP Units under the 2019 LTI Plan.

Under the Absolute TSR component, 40% of the LTIP Units will be earned if the Company’s TSR over the Performance Period is equal to 18%, 100% of the LTIP Units will be earned if the Company’s TSR over the Performance Period is equal to 27%, and 165% of the LTIP Units will be earned if the Company’s TSR over the Performance Period is equal to or greater than 36%. The Relative TSR component is based on the Company’s performance compared to a peer group comprised of 1412 companies. Under the Relative TSR Component, 40% of the LTIP Units will be earned if the Company’s TSR over the Performance Period is equal to the 35th percentile of the peer group, 100% of the LTIP Units will be earned if the Company’s TSR over the Performance Period is equal to the 55th percentile of the peer group, and 165% of the LTIP Units will be earned if the Company’s TSR over the Performance Period is equal to or above the 75th percentile of the peer group, with earning determined using linear interpolation if between such relative and absolute TSR thresholds. The fair value of the performance-based award portion of the 2019 LTI Plan on the date of grant was $4.3 million using a Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the fair value through a risk-neutral premise.

Time-based awards
The time-based awards under the 2019 LTI Plan, also granted in the form of LTIP Units, vest ratably over three years except in the case of our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, where the vesting is ratably over four years. As of December 31, 2019, theThe Company granted time-based awards under the 2019 LTI Plan that represent 112,910 LTIP units with a grant date fair value of $2.0 million. During the yearyears ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively, we recognized $1.4 million, $1.9 million and $1.4 million of compensation expense related to the 2019 LTI Plan.

2020 Long-Term Incentive Plan
On February 20, 2020, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees of the Company approved the Company’s 2020 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“2020 LTI Plan”). The Plan is a multi-year, equity compensation program under which participants, including our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, have the opportunity to earn awards in the form of LTIP units that vest based on (i) the passage of time (one-third of the fair value of the program) and (ii) performance goals tied to our relative and absolute TSR during the three-year performance period following their grant (two-thirds of the fair value of the program). The total grant date fair value under the 2020 LTI Plan was $8.8 million comprising performance-based and time-based awards as described further below:

Performance-based awards
For the performance-based awards under the 2020 LTI Plan, participants, have the opportunity to earn awards in the form of LTIP Units if Urban Edge’s absolute and/or relative TSR meets certain criteria over the three-year Performance Period beginning on February 20, 2020 and ending on February 19, 2023. The Company granted performance-based awards under the 2020 LTI Plan that represent 630,774 LTIP Units. The fair value of the performance-based award portion of the 2020 LTI Plan on the date of grant was $5.9 million using a Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the fair value through a risk-neutral premise.
Under the Absolute TSR component, 40% of the LTIP Units will be earned if the Company’s TSR over the Performance Period is equal to 18%, 100% of the LTIP Units will be earned if the Company’s TSR over the Performance Period is equal to 27%, and 165% of the LTIP Units will be earned if the Company’s TSR over the Performance Period is equal to or greater than 36%. The Relative TSR component is based on the Company’s performance compared to a peer group comprised of 12 companies. Under the Relative TSR Component, 40% of the LTIP Units will be earned if the Company’s TSR over the Performance Period is equal to the 35th percentile of the peer group, 100% of the LTIP Units will be earned if the Company’s TSR over the Performance Period is equal to the 55th percentile of the peer group, and 165% of the LTIP Units will be earned if the Company’s TSR over the Performance Period is equal to or above the 75th percentile of the peer group, with earning determined using linear interpolation if in between such relative and absolute TSR thresholds. During the years ended December 31, 2021
75


and 2020 we recognized $1.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively, of compensation expense related to the performance-based awards under the 2020 LTI Plan.

Time-based awards
The time-based awards granted under the 2020 LTI Plan, also granted in the form of LTIP Units, vest ratably over three years except in the case of our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, where the vesting is ratably over four years. The Company granted time-based awards under the 2020 LTI Plan that represent 169,004 LTIP units with a grant date fair value of $2.9 million. During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 we recognized $0.7 million and $1.1 million, respectively, of compensation expense related to the time-based awards under the 2020 LTI Plan.

2021 Long-Term Incentive Plan
On February 10, 2021, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees of the Company approved the Company’s 2021 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“2021 LTI Plan”). The Plan is a multi-year, equity compensation program under which participants, including our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, have the opportunity to earn awards in the form of LTIP units that vest based on the passage of time (one-half of the program) and performance goals tied to our relative and absolute TSR during the three-year Performance Period following their grant (one-half of the program). The total grant date fair value under the 2021 LTI Plan was $7.8 million, comprising both performance-based and time-based awards.

Performance-based awards
For the performance-based awards under the 2021 LTI Plan, participants have the opportunity to earn awards in the form of LTIP Units if Urban Edge’s absolute and/or relative TSR meets certain criteria over the three-year Performance Period beginning on February 10, 2021 and ending on February 9, 2024. The Company granted performance-based awards under the 2021 LTI Plan that represent 398,977 LTIP Units. The fair value of the performance-based award portion of the 2021 LTI Plan on the date of grant was $3.9 million using a Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the fair value through a risk-neutral premise.
Under the Absolute TSR component, 40% of the LTIP Units will be earned if the Company’s TSR over the Performance Period is equal to 18%, 100% of the LTIP Units will be earned if the Company’s TSR over the Performance Period is equal to 27%, and 165% of the LTIP Units will be earned if the Company’s TSR over the Performance Period is equal to or greater than 36%. The Relative TSR component is based on the Company’s performance compared to a peer group comprised of 15 companies. Under the Relative TSR Component, 40% of the LTIP Units will be earned if the Company’s TSR over the Performance Period is equal to the 35th percentile of the peer group, 100% of the LTIP Units will be earned if the Company’s TSR over the Performance Period is equal to the 55th percentile of the peer group, and 165% of the LTIP Units will be earned if the Company’s TSR over the Performance Period is equal to or above the 75th percentile of the peer group, with earning determined using linear interpolation if in between such relative and absolute TSR thresholds. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we recognized $1.0 million of compensation expense related to the performance-based awards under the 2021 LTI Plan.

Time-based awards
The time-based awards granted under the 2021 LTI Plan, also granted in the form of LTIP Units, vest ratably over three years except in the case of our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, where the vesting is ratably over four years. As of December 31, 2021, the Company granted time-based awards under the 2021 LTI Plan that represent 273,615 LTIP units with a grant date fair value of $3.9 million. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we recognized $1.0 million of compensation expense related to the time-based awards under the 2021 LTI Plan.

Units and Deferred Share Units Granted to Trustees
On May 9, 2019,6, 2020, certain trustees elected to receive a portion of their compensation in deferred share units and an aggregate of 5,60812,121 shares were granted to those trustees based on the weighted average grant date fair value of $15.60. During both the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, the Company incurred expenses of $0.2 million related to deferred share units granted to trustees.
$8.25. In addition, On May 9, 2019, certain trustees elected to receive a portion of their compensation in LTIP units and an aggregate of 28,04087,117 LTIP units, were granted to those trustees based on the weighted average grant date fair value of $14.98.$8.03.
On May 5, 2021, a certain trustee elected to receive a portion of their compensation in deferred share units and an aggregate of 6,476 shares were granted to this trustee based on the weighted average grant date fair value of $15.44. In addition, certain trustees elected to receive a portion of their compensation in LTIP units and an aggregate of 39,756 LTIP units were granted to those trustees based on the weighted average grant date fair value of $15.09.
On July 1, 2021 a certain trustee elected to receive a portion of their compensation in LTIP units and an aggregate of 12,254 LTIP units were granted to this trustee based on the weighted average grant date fair value of $15.02.
76


On November 22, 2021, a certain trustee elected to receive a portion of their compensation in LTIP units and an aggregate of 10,208 LTIP units were granted to this trustee based on the weighted average grant date fair value of $14.17.

2022 Long-Term Incentive Plan
On February 11, 2022, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees of the Company (the “Compensation Committee”) approved the Company’s 2022 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“2022 LTI Plan”). The Plan is a multi-year, equity compensation program under which participants, including our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, have the opportunity to earn awards in the form of LTIP units that vest based on (i) the passage of time (one-half of the program) and (ii) performance goals tied to our relative total shareholder return (“TSR”), absolute TSR and FFO as Adjusted growth over a three year performance period (one-half of the program). The total grant date fair value under the 2022 LTI Plan was $8.6 million, comprising both performance-based and time-based awards.
Shares Under Option
All stock options granted have ten-year contractual lives, containing vesting terms of three to five years. As of December 31, 2019, the weighted average contractual term of shares under option outstanding at the end of the period is 7.6 years. The following table presents stock option activity for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017:


 Shares Under Options Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share Weighted Average Remaining Expected Term
     (In years)
Outstanding at January 1, 20172,472,284
 $23.86
 5.33
Granted137,259
 28.36
 6.01
Exercised
 
 
Forfeited or expired(5,879) 23.17
 
Outstanding at December 31, 20172,603,664
 24.09
 4.40
Granted2,146,885
 21.71
 4.58
Exercised
 
 
Forfeited or expired
 
 
Outstanding at December 31, 20184,750,549
 23.02
 4.48
Granted180,213
 19.53
 3.88
Exercised
 
 
Forfeited or expired
 
 
Outstanding at December 31, 20194,930,762
 $22.89
 4.46
Exercisable at December 31, 20191,500,793
 $24.00
 

2021:
The weighted average grant date fair value of
Shares Under OptionsWeighted Average Exercise Price per ShareWeighted Average Remaining Contractual Term
(in years)
Outstanding at January 1, 20214,930,762$22.89
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited or expired(1,000,000)21.72
Outstanding at December 31, 20213,930,762$23.193.56
Exercisable at December 31, 20213,156,449$23.61
No options were granted in 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $3.88, $4.68, and $5.10, respectively. NaN options wereor exercised during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019.2021. As of December 31, 2019,2021, there was 0no intrinsic value for the outstanding and exercisable shares under option.

During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the fair value of the options granted was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions:
 February 24, 2017 February 22, 2018 September 27, 2018 February 27, 2019
Risk-free interest rate1.93% 2.73% 3.00% 2.54%
Expected option life6.25 6.25 7.00 6.25
Expected volatility25.06% 32.23% 30.42% 30.98%

The options were granted with an exercise price equivalent to the average of the high and low share price on the grant date.
Restricted0Restricted Shares
The following table presents information regarding restricted share activity during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018,2021, 2020, and 2017:
 Shares Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value per Share
Unvested at January 1, 2017129,395
 $24.29
Granted104,698
 27.69
Vested(53,236) 25.13
Forfeited(5,427) 24.64
Unvested at December 31, 2017175,430
 26.05
Granted103,814
 21.65
Vested(84,185) 25.67
Forfeited(32,482) 23.32
Unvested at December 31, 2018162,577
 23.99
Granted34,638
 19.15
Vested(96,378) 24.19
Forfeited(5,672) 22.11
Unvested at December 31, 201995,165
 $22.16

2019:


SharesWeighted Average Grant Date Fair Value per Share
Unvested at January 1, 202172,393 19.03 
Granted17,933 15.58 
Vested(35,674)20.06 
Forfeited(5,305)18.03 
Unvested at December 31, 202149,347 $17.23 
During the yearsyear ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017,2021, we granted 34,638, 103,814, and 104,69817,933 restricted shares respectively, that are subject to forfeiture and vest over periods ranging from one to fourthree years. The total grant date value of the 96,378, 84,185, and 53,23635,674 restricted shares vested during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 20172021 was $2.3 million, $2.2 million and $1.3 million, respectively.$0.7 million.

Restricted Units
During the years ended December 31, 2019 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, respectively, there were 276,482, 444,954335,833, 297,195 and 31,734276,482 additional LTIP units issued. During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, 2018271,635, 433,016, and 2017, 131,884 24,722, and 16,789 units vested, respectively. TheThere were no restricted units converted to common shares during the year ended December 31, 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2020, 223,553 restricted units were converted to common shares. As of December 31, 2021 the remaining 727,040629,931 units vest over a weighted average period of 2.8approximately two years.




77


Share-Based Compensation Expense
Share-based compensation expense, which is included in general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of income, is summarized as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)2019 2018 2017(Amounts in thousands)202120202019
Share-based compensation expense components:     Share-based compensation expense components:
Restricted share expense$1,697
 $2,051
 $1,961
Restricted share expense$461 $832 $1,697 
Stock option expense4,055
 2,778
 2,569
Stock option expense1,435 4,991 4,055 
LTIP expense(1)
4,477
 2,218
 557
LTIP expense(1)
4,909 7,331 4,477 
Performance-based LTI expense(2)
3,164
 2,530
 2,050
Performance-based LTI expense(2)
3,865 3,792 3,164 
DSU expense156
 164
 
DSU expense149 48 156 
Total Share-based compensation expense$13,549
 $9,741
 $7,137
Total Share-based compensation expense$10,819 $16,994 $13,549 
(1) LTIP expense includes the time-based portion of the 20182021, 2020, 2019 and 20192018 LTI Plans.
(2) Performance-based LTI expense includes the 2015 and 2017 OPP plansplan and the performance-based portion of the 20182021, 2020, 2019 and 20192018 LTI Plans.

As of December 31, 2019,2021, we had a total of $22.7$13.2 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested and restricted share-based payment arrangements including unvested stock options, LTIP units, deferred share units, and restricted share awards which were granted under our Omnibus Share Plan as well as OPP awards. This expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.7two years.



80



16.     EARNINGS PER SHARE AND UNIT

Urban Edge Earnings per Share
We have calculated earnings per share (“EPS”) under the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation methodology whereby EPS for each class of Urban Edge common shares and participating securities is calculated according to dividends declared and participating rights in undistributed earnings. Restricted shares issued pursuant to our share-based compensation program are considered participating securities, and as such have non-forfeitable rights to receive dividends.
The computation of diluted EPS reflects potential dilution of securities by adding potential common shares, including stock options and unvested restricted shares, to the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019 there were options outstanding for 4,930,762, 4,750,549, and 2,603,6643,930,762 shares respectively, that potentially could be exercised for common shares. During the year ended December 31, 2017, 167,933 options with exercise prices ranging from $22.83 to $28.36, were included in the diluted EPS calculation as their option prices were lower than the average market prices of our common shares. During the years ended December 31, 20182021, 2020 and 2019, no options were included in the diluted EPS calculation as their exercise prices were higher than the average market prices of our common shares. In addition, as of December 31, 20192021 there were 95,16549,347 unvested restricted shares outstanding that potentially could become unrestricted common shares. The computation of diluted EPS for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019 included the 100,406, 188,329,54,988, 77,289, and 167,100100,406 weighted average unvested restricted shares outstanding, respectively, as their effect is dilutive.

The effect of the redemption of OP and vested LTIP units is not reflected in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share, as they are redeemable for common shares on a one-for-one basis. The income allocable to such units is allocated on this same basis and reflected as noncontrolling interests in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. As such, the assumed redemption of these units would have no net impact on the determination of diluted earnings per share since they would be anti-dilutive.











78


The following table sets forth the computation of our basic and diluted earnings per share:
Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)202120202019
Numerator:
Net income attributable to common shareholders$102,686 $93,589 $109,523 
Less: Earnings allocated to unvested participating securities(47)(62)(92)
Net income available for common shareholders - basic$102,639 $93,527 $109,431 
Impact of assumed conversions:
OP and LTIP units3,675 81 
Net income available for common shareholders - dilutive$106,314 $93,608 $109,436 
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic117,029 117,722 119,751 
Effect of dilutive securities:
Restricted share awards55 77 100 
Assumed conversion of OP and LTIP units4,363 103 45 
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted121,447 117,902 119,896 
Earnings per share available to common shareholders:
Earnings per common share - Basic$0.88 $0.79 $0.91 
Earnings per common share - Diluted$0.88 $0.79 $0.91 
 Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)2019 2018 2017
Numerator:     
Net income attributable to common shareholders$109,523
 $105,150
 $67,070
Less: Earnings allocated to unvested participating securities(92) (184) (155)
Net income available for common shareholders - basic$109,431
 $104,966

$66,915
Impact of assumed conversions:     
OP and LTIP units5
 
 5,782
Net income available for common shareholders - dilutive$109,436
 $104,966

$72,697
      
Denominator:     
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic119,751
 113,863
 107,132
Effect of dilutive securities:     
Stock options using the treasury stock method
 
 168
Restricted share awards100
 188
 167
Assumed conversion of OP and LTIP units45
 
 10,923
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted119,896
 114,051
 118,390
      
Earnings per share available to common shareholders:     
Earnings per common share - Basic$0.91
 $0.92
 $0.62
Earnings per common share - Diluted$0.91
 $0.92
 $0.61








Operating Partnership Earnings per Unit
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per unit:
Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except per unit amounts)202120202019
Numerator:
Net income attributable to unitholders$106,982 $97,749 $116,222 
Less: net income attributable to participating securities(47)(62)(92)
Net income available for unitholders$106,935 $97,687 $116,130 
Denominator:
Weighted average units outstanding - basic120,966 121,957 126,333 
Effect of dilutive securities issued by Urban Edge55 77 100 
Unvested LTIP units1,086 777 45 
Weighted average units outstanding - diluted122,107 122,811 126,478 
Earnings per unit available to unitholders:
Earnings per unit - Basic$0.88 $0.80 $0.92 
Earnings per unit - Diluted$0.88 $0.80 $0.92 
 Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except per unit amounts)2019 2018 2017
Numerator:     
Net income attributable to unitholders$116,222
 $116,918
 $72,894
Less: net income attributable to participating securities(92) (200) (155)
Net income available for unitholders$116,130

$116,718
 $72,739
      
Denominator:     
Weighted average units outstanding - basic126,333
 126,198
 117,779
Effect of dilutive securities issued by Urban Edge100
 188
 335
Unvested LTIP units45
 
 276
Weighted average units outstanding - diluted126,478
 126,386
 118,390
      
Earnings per unit available to unitholders:     
Earnings per unit - Basic$0.92
 $0.92
 $0.62
Earnings per unit - Diluted$0.92
 $0.92
 $0.61



17.     QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (unaudited)

The following tables summarize the quarterly results of operations of Urban Edge Properties and Urban Edge Properties LP for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
 Three Months Ended,
(Amounts in thousands, except per share/unit amounts)December 31, 2019 September 30, 2019 June 30, 2019 March 31, 2019
Total revenue$95,927
 $91,243
 $102,747
 $97,732
Total expenses78,098
 61,900
 71,222
 72,561
Net income3,538
 56,700
 28,067
 27,892
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in operating partnership(164) (2,662) (1,518) (2,355)
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries1
 2
 22
 
Net income attributable to common shareholders3,375
 54,040
 26,571
 25,537
Net income attributable to unitholders3,539

56,702

28,089

27,892
Earnings per common share - Basic0.03
 0.45
 0.22
 0.22
Earnings per common share - Diluted0.03
 0.45
 0.22
 0.22
Earnings per common unit - Basic0.03
 0.45
 0.22
 0.22
Earnings per common unit - Diluted0.03
 0.45
 0.22
 0.22



 Three Months Ended,
(Amounts in thousands, except per share/unit amounts)December 31, 2018 September 30, 2018 June 30, 2018 March 31, 2018
Total revenue$100,923
 $112,214
 $101,970
 $99,053
Total expenses76,478
 73,017
 78,816
 63,984
Net income7,251
 26,899
 59,774
 23,039
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in operating partnership(727) (2,688) (6,025) (2,328)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries(11) (11) (12) (11)
Net income attributable to common shareholders6,513
 24,200
 53,737
 20,700
Net income attributable to unitholders7,240
 26,888
 59,762
 23,028
Earnings per common share - Basic0.06
 0.21
 0.47
 0.18
Earnings per common share - Diluted0.06
 0.21
 0.47
 0.18
Earnings per common unit - Basic0.06
 0.21
 0.47
 0.18
Earnings per common unit - Diluted0.06
 0.21
 0.47
 0.18


79



83



ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
ITEM 9.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

None.

ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 9A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Controls and Procedures (Urban Edge Properties)

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Because of inherent limitations, disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of disclosure controls and procedures are met.
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is processed, recorded, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The management of Urban Edge Properties and subsidiaries (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company, defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the Company’s Board of Trustees, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting, which requires the use of certain estimates and judgments, and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and trustees of the Company; and
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and fraud. In designing and evaluating our control system, management recognized that any control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, that may affect our operation have been or will be detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management’s override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions that cannot be anticipated at the present time, or the degree of
80


compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.



The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019.2021. In making this assessment, the Company’s management used the criteria set forth by the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) (the COSO criteria). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2019,2021, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective in providing reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20192021 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm as stated in their attestation report which is included herein.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the three months ended December 31, 20192021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Controls and Procedures (Urban Edge Properties LP)

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Operating Partnership’s management maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our general partner, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Because of inherent limitations, disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of disclosure controls and procedures are met.
The Operating Partnership’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our general partner, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our general partner concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is processed, recorded, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Operating Partnership’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Operating Partnership, defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Operating Partnership’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the Board of Trustees, management and other personnel of the Operating Partnership’s general partner, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting, which requires the use of certain estimates and judgments, and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and trustees of the Operating Partnership’s general partner; and
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
81


The Operating Partnership’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our general partner, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and fraud. In designing and evaluating our control system, management recognized that any control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and management necessarily was required


to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, that may affect our operation have been or will be detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management’s override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions that cannot be anticipated at the present time, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.

The Operating Partnership’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019.2021. In making this assessment, the Operating Partnership’s management used the criteria set forth by the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) (the COSO criteria). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2019,2021, the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting was effective in providing reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The effectiveness of the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20192021 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm as stated in their attestation report which is included herein.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the three months ended December 31, 20192021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

82
86




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of Urban Edge Properties

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Urban Edge Properties and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2021, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, of the Company and our report dated February 12, 202016, 2022, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company'sCompany’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
February 12, 202016, 2022


87
83




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Partners of Urban Edge Properties LP

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Urban Edge Properties LP (the “Operating Partnership”) as of December 31, 2019,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Operating Partnership maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2021, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules as of and for the year ended December 31, 20192021, of the Operating Partnership and our report dated February 12, 202016, 2022, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Operating Partnership’sPartnership's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Operating Partnership’sPartnership's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Operating Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
February 12, 202016, 2022



88
84



ITEM 9B.
ITEM 9B.     OTHER INFORMATION

None.

On February 11, 2022, the Compensation Committee approved and adopted an Executive Severance and Change in Control Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit of certain of the Company’s executive officers and other eligible employees that the Compensation Committee may designate from time to time (the “Participants”). Each of the Company’s named executive officers identified in the Company’s proxy statement filed in connection with its 2021 annual meeting of shareholders has been named as Participants in the Plan (other than those executives whose severance benefits are governed by the terms of their existing agreements with the Company).
Under the Plan, in the event that a Participant’s employment is terminated by the Company for any reason other than for cause or death or disability, such Participant shall be entitled to (i) a lump sum payment equal to the product of (A) a severance multiple of either 1.0 (or such lesser multiple as may be agreed for non-executive officers), as specified in the letter agreement provided to each Participant upon qualification for the Plan, and (B) the sum of the Participant’s annual base salary and most recent target annual cash performance bonus, (ii) continuing coverage under the Company’s group medical, dental and vision plans as would have applied if the Participant remained employed for a number of years equal to the applicable severance multiple (at such cost to the Participant as would have applied in the absence of such termination), and (iii) full acceleration of time-base based equity awards held by the Participant and any accelerated vesting of equity awards with performance-based vesting to occur in accordance with the terms of the applicable award agreement. In addition, if such termination occurs within three months prior to, or within 12 months following, a Change in Control (as defined in the Plan), the relevant severance multiple will be 1.5 (or such lesser multiple as may be agreed for non-executive officers), as specified in the letter agreement provided to each Participant upon qualification for the Plan.
In the event that a Participant’s employment is terminated on account of his or her death or disability, such Participant (or the Participant’s estate or beneficiaries) shall be entitled to, among other things, full acceleration of time-base based equity awards held by the Participant and any equity awards with performance-based vesting to remain outstanding and earned in accordance with the their terms based on performance but without further vesting based on service. Additionally, in the event that a Participant’s employment is terminated on account of his or her disability, such Participant shall be entitled to receive any compensation and/or benefits as may be due or payable to such Participant in accordance with the terms and provisions of any employee benefit plans or programs of Urban Edge.
As a condition to participation in the Plan, each Participant must enter into a letter agreement with the Company in the form attached as an exhibit to the Plan, which, among other things, contains restrictive covenants in favor of the Company, including confidentiality, intellectual property, non-disparagement, non-competition and non-solicitation covenants. Participants must generally also execute, deliver and not revoke a general release of claims in favor of the Company in order to receive benefits.
The foregoing is a summary of the Plan and should be read in conjunction with the full text of the Plan, which is attached hereto as Exhibit 10.17 and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 9C.     DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS

Not applicable.

PART III

ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 10.    DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by Item 10 will be included in the Proxy Statement to be filed relating to Urban Edge Properties’ 20202022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by Item 11 will be included in the Proxy Statement to be filed relating to Urban Edge Properties’ 20202022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.


89
85



ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
ITEM 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table summarizes information, as of December 31, 2019,2021, relating to our equity compensation plans pursuant to which our common shares or other equity securities may be granted from time to time.
 (a) (b) (c) (a)(b)(c)
Plan Category Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights 
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (2)
 Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column a) Plan CategoryNumber of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (2)
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column a)
      
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 3,549,423
(1) 
$20.04
 4,074,804
(3 
) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders2,821,917 (1)$20.04 4,151,073 (3)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 2,323,444
(4) 
21.72
 N/A
 Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders1,019,557 (4)21.72 N/A
Total 5,872,867
 $20.71
 4,074,804
 Total3,841,474 $20.49 4,151,073 
(1) Includes an aggregate of (i) 3,429,969107,646 common shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding unvested options (excluding 2,831,617 common shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding vested options) and (ii) 2,307,1222,714,271 common shares issuable in exchange for common units which may, upon satisfaction of certain conditions, be issuable pursuant to outstanding LTIP Units in our Operating Partnership (“LTIP Units”). The LTIP Units outstanding as of December 31, 20192021 include 1,045,0881,397,695 LTIP Units issued pursuant to our 2017 OPP, 20182019 LTI Plan, 2020 LTI Plan, and 20192021 LTI Plan which remain subject to performance-based vesting criteria.
(2)The LTIP Units do not have an exercise price. Accordingly, these awards are not included in the weighted-average exercise price calculation.
(3) Includes (i) 2,241,5082,137,585 common shares remaining available for issuance under the Urban Edge Properties 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) and (ii) 1,833,2962,013,488 common share remaining available under the Urban Edge Properties 2015 Employee Share Purchase Plan (“ESPP”). The number of common shares remaining available for issuance under the Plan is based on awards being granted as "Full Value Awards," as defined in the Plan, including awards such as restricted stock, LTIP units or performance units that do not require the payment of an exercise price. If we were to grant awards other than “Full Value Awards," as defined in the Plan, including stock options or stock appreciation rights, the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under the Plan would be 4,483,016.4,275,169. Pursuant to the terms of the ESPP, on each January 1 prior to the tenth anniversary of the ESPP’s effective date, an additional number of common shares will be added to the maximum number of shares authorized for issuance under the ESPP equal to the lesser of (a) 0.1% of the total number of common shares outstanding on December 31 of the preceding calendar year and (b) 150,000 common shares; provided that the Compensation Committee of our Board of Trustees may act prior to January 1 of any calendar year to provide that there will be no increase in the share reserve for that calendar year, or that the increase in the share reserve for that calendar year shall be less than the increase that would otherwise occur.
(4) Relates to the Urban Edge Properties 2018 Inducement Equity Plan, which is an omnibus equity plan pursuant to which we may grant a variety of equity awards pursuant to the employment inducement award exemption provided by Section 303A.08 of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual, including options, share appreciation rights, performance shares, restricted shares and other share-based awards including LTIP Units. A total of 2,352,8901,170,628 common shares are authorized to be issued under the 2018 Inducement Equity Plan. The 2018 Inducement Equity Plan has a ten-year term expiring on September 20, 2028 and generally may be amended at any time by our Board of Trustees. Included in the 2,352,8901,170,628 common shares authorized to be issued under the 2018 Inducement Equity Plan are an aggregate of (i) 2,000,000666,667 common shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding unvested options (excluding 333,333 common shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding vested options) and (ii) 352,890170,628 common shares issuable in exchange for common units which may, upon satisfaction of certain conditions, be issuable pursuant to outstanding LTIP Units in our Operating Partnership (“LTIP Units”).

Additional information concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management required by Item 12 will be included in the Proxy Statement to be filed relating to Urban Edge Properties’ 20202022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
ITEM 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by Item 13 will be included in the Proxy Statement to be filed relating to Urban Edge Properties’ 20202022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by Item 14 will be included in the Proxy Statement to be filed relating to Urban Edge Properties’ 20202022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.


90
86




PART IV

ITEM 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
ITEM 15.    EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)(1) Financial Statements
Our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, together with the Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm are included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K commencing on page 4237.

(2) Financial Statement Schedules
Our financial statement schedules are included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K commencing on page 9692.

(3) Exhibits
A list of exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is set forth on the Index to Exhibits commencing on page 9288 and is incorporated herein by reference.

(b) See Index to Exhibits

(c) Schedules other than those listed above are omitted because they are not applicable or the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.

ITEM 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY
ITEM 16.    FORM 10-K SUMMARY

Not applicable.


91
87




INDEX TO EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are included as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
Exhibit NumberExhibit Description
10.32


88


101.SCH*Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL*Inline XBRL Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.LAB*Inline XBRL Extension Labels Linkbase
101.PRE*Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
101.DEF*Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
104*
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL with applicable taxonomy extension information contained in Exhibits 101.*)

* Filed herewith
** In accordance with Item 601 (b)(32) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. Such certifications will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
† Management contracts and compensatory plans or arrangements required to be filed pursuant to Item 15(b) of Form 10-K.


93
89




SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES
(Registrant)
URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES
(Registrant)
/s/ Mark Langer
Mark Langer, Chief Financial Officer
Date: February 12, 202016, 2022
URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES LP
By: Urban Edge Properties, General Partner
/s/ Mark Langer
Mark Langer, Chief Financial Officer
Date: February 12, 202016, 2022




































90


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Urban Edge Properties in its own capacity and in its capacity as the sole general partner of Urban Edge Properties LP, and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

SignatureTitleDate
By:/s/ Jeffrey S. OlsonChairman of the Board of TrusteesFebruary 16, 2022
Jeffrey S. Olsonand Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:SignatureTitleDate
By:/s/ Jeffrey S. OlsonChairman of the Board of TrusteesFebruary 12, 2020
Jeffrey S. Olsonand Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ Mark LangerChief Financial OfficerFebruary 12, 202016, 2022
Mark Langer(Principal Financial Officer)
By:/s/ Jennifer HolmesChief Accounting OfficerFebruary 12, 202016, 2022
Jennifer Holmes(Principal Accounting Officer)
By:/s/ Susan GivensTrusteeFebruary 16, 2022
Susan Givens
By:/s/ Michael A. GouldTrusteeFebruary 12, 202016, 2022
Michael A. Gould
By:/s/ Steven H. GrapsteinTrusteeFebruary 12, 202016, 2022
Steven H. Grapstein
By:/s/ Steven J. GuttmanTrusteeFebruary 12, 202016, 2022
Steven J. Guttman
By:/s/ Norman K. JenkinsTrusteeFebruary 16, 2022
Norman K. Jenkins
By:/s/ Amy B. LaneTrusteeFebruary 12, 202016, 2022
Amy B. Lane
By:/s/ Kevin P. O’SheaTrusteeFebruary 12, 202016, 2022
Kevin P. O’Shea
By:/s/ Steven RothTrusteeFebruary 12, 202016, 2022
Steven Roth
By:/s/ Douglas W. SeslerTrusteeFebruary 16, 2022
Douglas W. Sesler

91
95



URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES AND URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES LP
SCHEDULE II- VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(in thousands)
Column A Column B Column C Column D Column E
Description Balance
at Beginning
of Year
 Additions
(Reversals)
Expensed
 Uncollectible
Accounts
Written-Off
 Balance
at End
of Year
Year Ended December 31, 2019:        
Allowance for doubtful accounts(1)
 $
 $
 $
 $
Year Ended December 31, 2018:        
Allowance for doubtful accounts 5,431
 4,138
 (2,949) 6,620
Year Ended December 31, 2017:        
Allowance for doubtful accounts 2,593
 3,445
 (607) 5,431

(1)Due to the adoption of ASC 842, we recognize changes in the collectibility assessment of operating leases as adjustments to rental revenue and thus no allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained.


96



URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES AND URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES LP
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
(in thousands)
    Initial cost to company   
Gross amount at which
carried at close of period
      
Description Encumbrances Land 
Building and
improvements
 
Costs
capitalized
subsequent
to acquisition
 Land 
Building and
improvements
 
Total(2)
 
Accumulated
depreciation
and
amortization(1)
 
Date of
construction
 
Date
acquired
                     
SHOPPING CENTERS AND MALLS:            
Baltimore (Towson), MD 
 581
 3,227
 18,592
 581
 21,819
 22,400
 (7,144) 1968 1968
Bensalem, PA 
 2,727
 6,698
 1,617
 2,727
 8,315
 11,042
 (4,297) 1972/ 1999 1972
Bergen Town Center - East, Paramus, NJ 
 6,305
 6,824
 41,993
 6,305
 48,817
 55,122
 (10,125) 1957/ 2009 2003/ 2019
Bergen Town Center - West, Paramus, NJ 300,000
 22,930
 89,358
 387,208
 42,968
 456,528
 499,496
 (132,711) 1957/ 2009 2003/ 2015
Bethlehem, PA 
 827
 5,200
 (6,027) 
 
 
 
 1966 1966/ 2018/ 2019
Brick, NJ 50,000
 1,391
 11,179
 13,948
 1,391
 25,127
 26,518
 (16,338) 1968 1968
Bronx (Bruckner Boulevard), NY 
 66,100
 259,503
 6,320
 61,618
 270,305
 331,923
 (33,385) N/A 2007
Bronx (Shops at Bruckner), NY 10,978
 
 32,979
 (271) 
 32,708
 32,708
 (2,780) N/A 2017
Bronx (1750-1780 Gun Hill Road), NY 24,500
 6,427
 11,885
 23,363
 6,428
 35,247
 41,675
 (10,568) 2009 2005
Broomall, PA 
 850
 2,171
 1,623
 850
 3,794
 4,644
 (2,998) 1966 1966
Buffalo (Amherst), NY 
 5,743
 4,056
 16,559
 5,107
 21,251
 26,358
 (9,018) 1968 1968
Cambridge (leased through 2033)(3), MA
 
 
 
 1,002
 
 1,002
 1,002
 (101) N/A 2007
Carlstadt (leased through 2050)(3), NJ
 
 
 16,458
 133
 
 16,591
 16,591
 (5,053) N/A 2007
Charleston (leased through 2063)(3), SC
 
 
 3,634
 308
 
 3,942
 3,942
 (1,230) N/A 2006
Cherry Hill (Plaza at Cherry Hill), NJ 28,930
 14,602
 33,666
 (3,065) 14,602
 30,601
 45,203
 (3,967) N/A 2017
Commack (leased through 2021)(3), NY
 
 
 43
 160
 
 203
 203
 (247) N/A 2006
Dewitt (leased through 2041)(3), NY
 
 
 7,116
 
 
 7,116
 7,116
 (2,334) N/A 2006
Rockaway, NJ 27,800
 559
 6,363
 5,340
 559
 11,703
 12,262
 (7,008) 1964 1964
East Brunswick, NJ 63,000
 2,417
 17,169
 7,580
 2,417
 24,749
 27,166
 (18,745) 
1957/
1972
 
1957/
1972
East Hanover (200 - 240 Route 10 West), NJ 63,000
 2,232
 18,241
 16,347
 2,671
 34,149
 36,820
 (17,610) 1962 
1962/
1998
East Hanover (280 Route 10 West), NJ 
 
 
 6,063
 
 6,063
 6,063
 (1,834) N/A 
1962/
1998
East Rutherford, NJ 23,000
 
 36,727
 1,256
 
 37,983
 37,983
 (8,876) 2007 2007
Freeport (Meadowbrook Commons) (leased through 2040)(3), NY
 
 
 
 260
 
 260
 260
 (260) N/A 2005
Freeport (Freeport Commons), NY 43,100
 1,231
 4,747
 4,679
 1,593
 9,064
 10,657
 (6,851) 1981 1981
Garfield, NJ 40,300
 45
 8,068
 46,294
 44
 54,363
 54,407
 (16,547) 2009 1998
Glenolden, PA 
 850
 1,820
 741
 850
 2,561
 3,411
 (2,320) 1975 1975


Initial cost to companyGross amount at which
carried at close of period
DescriptionEncumbrancesLandBuilding and
improvements
Costs
capitalized
subsequent
to acquisition
LandBuilding and
improvements
Total(2)
Accumulated
depreciation
and
amortization(1)
Date of
construction
Date
acquired
SHOPPING CENTERS AND MALLS:
Baltimore (Towson), MD— 581 3,227 19,637 581 22,864 23,445 (9,516)19681968
Bensalem, PA— 2,727 6,698 1,610 2,727 8,308 11,035 (4,656)1972/ 19991972
Bergen Town Center - East, Paramus, NJ— 6,305 6,824 41,465 6,305 48,289 54,594 (12,174)1957/ 20092003/ 2019
Bergen Town Center - West, Paramus, NJ300,000 22,930 89,358 384,257 32,371 464,174 496,545 (137,991)1957/ 20092003/ 2020
Brick, NJ49,554 1,391 11,179 14,579 1,391 25,758 27,149 (17,867)19681968
Bronx (Bruckner Boulevard), NY— 66,100 259,503 3,730 55,295 274,038 329,333 (50,679)N/A2007
Bronx (Shops at Bruckner), NY9,698 — 32,979 5,112 — 38,091 38,091 (2,895)N/A2017
Bronx (1750-1780 Gun Hill Road), NY24,680 6,427 11,885 23,702 6,428 35,586 42,014 (12,985)20092005
Brooklyn (Kingswood Center), NY70,815 15,690 76,766 (2,096)15,690 74,670 90,360 (4,660)N/A2020
Brooklyn (Kingswood Crossing), NY— 8,150 64,159 1,509 8,150 65,668 73,818 (3,741)N/A2020
Broomall, PA— 850 2,171 8,042 321 10,742 11,063 (1,849)19661966
Buffalo (Amherst), NY— 5,743 4,056 16,578 5,107 21,270 26,377 (11,016)19681968
Cambridge (leased through 2033)(3), MA
— — — 97 — 97 97 (24)N/A2007
Carlstadt (leased through 2050)(3), NJ
— — 16,458 137 — 16,595 16,595 (5,905)N/A2007
Charleston (leased through 2063)(3), SC
— — 3,634 308 — 3,942 3,942 (1,442)N/A2006
Cherry Hill (Plaza at Cherry Hill), NJ28,244 14,602 33,666 (2,679)14,602 30,987 45,589 (6,140)N/A2017
Dewitt (leased through 2041)(3), NY
— — 7,116 — — 7,116 7,116 (2,787)N/A2006
Rockaway, NJ27,800 559 6,363 4,868 559 11,231 11,790 (7,315)19641964
East Brunswick, NJ63,000 2,417 17,169 7,524 2,417 24,693 27,110 (19,717)1957/
1972
1957/
1972
East Hanover (200 - 240 Route 10 West), NJ63,000 2,232 18,241 16,690 2,671 34,492 37,163 (20,946)19621962/
1998
East Rutherford, NJ23,000 — 36,727 1,303 — 38,030 38,030 (10,431)20072007
Freeport (Meadowbrook Commons) (leased through 2040)(3), NY
— — — 927 — 927 927 (22)N/A2005
Freeport (Freeport Commons), NY43,100 1,231 4,747 4,631 1,593 9,016 10,609 (6,839)19811981
Garfield, NJ40,300 45 8,068 46,545 44 54,614 54,658 (21,052)20091998
Glenarden, MD (Woodmore Towne Centre)117,200 28,397 144,834 — 28,397 144,834 173,231 (131)N/A2021
Glenolden, PA— 850 1,820 824 850 2,644 3,494 (2,373)19751975
Hackensack, NJ66,400 692 10,219 7,601 692 17,820 18,512 (12,415)19631963
Hazlet, NJ— 7,400 9,413 (8,028)5,211 3,574 8,785 (79)N/A2007
92
    Initial cost to company   
Gross amount at which
carried at close of period
      
Description Encumbrances Land 
Building and
improvements
 
Costs
capitalized
subsequent
to acquisition
 Land 
Building and
improvements
 
Total(2)
 
Accumulated
depreciation
and
amortization(1)
 
Date of
construction
 
Date
acquired
                     
Hackensack, NJ 66,400
 692
 10,219
 7,573
 692
 17,792
 18,484
 (11,108) 1963 1963
Hazlet, NJ 
 7,400
 9,413
 (8,082) 5,211
 3,520
 8,731
 
 N/A 2007
Huntington, NY 
 21,200
 33,667
 8,588
 21,200
 42,255
 63,455
 (11,361) N/A 2007
Inwood, NY 
 12,419
 19,097
 3,115
 12,419
 22,212
 34,631
 (8,521) N/A 2004
Jersey City (Hudson Commons), NJ 29,000
 652
 7,495
 950
 652
 8,445
 9,097
 (3,792) 1965 1965
Jersey City (Hudson Mall), NJ 23,625
 15,824
 37,593
 (3,463) 15,824
 34,130
 49,954
 (4,803) N/A 2017
Kearny, NJ 
 309
 3,376
 16,996
 296
 20,385
 20,681
 (5,517) 1938 1959
Lancaster, PA 
 3,140
 63
 2,059
 3,140
 2,122
 5,262
 (922) 1966 1966
Las Catalinas, Puerto Rico 129,335
 15,280
 64,370
 15,858
 15,280
 80,228
 95,508
 (40,475) 1996 2002
Lawnside, NJ 
 1,226
 3,164
 (4,390) 
 
 
 
 1969 
1969/
2015
Lodi (Route 17 North), NJ 
 238
 9,446
 519
 238
 9,965
 10,203
 (4,780) 1999 1975
Lodi (Washington Street), NJ 
 7,606
 13,125
 2,855
 7,606
 15,980
 23,586
 (5,747) N/A 2004
Manalapan, NJ 
 725
 7,189
 6,278
 1,046
 13,146
 14,192
 (9,620) 1971 1971
Manchester, MO 12,500
 4,409
 13,756
 (6,799) 2,858
 8,508
 11,366
 (127) N/A 2017
Marlton, NJ 37,400
 1,611
 3,464
 14,416
 1,454
 18,037
 19,491
 (11,913) 1973 1973
Middletown, NJ 31,400
 283
 5,248
 2,836
 283
 8,084
 8,367
 (6,555) 1963 1963
Millburn, NJ 23,798
 15,783
 25,837
 400
 15,783
 26,237
 42,020
 (3,312) N/A 2017
Montclair, NJ 
 66
 419
 1,439
 448
 1,476
 1,924
 (771) 1972 1972
Montehiedra, Puerto Rico 113,202
 9,182
 66,751
 29,548
 9,267
 96,214
 105,481
 (46,129) 
1996/
2015
 1997
Morris Plains, NJ 
 1,104
 6,411
 8,870
 1,104
 15,281
 16,385
 (7,404) 1961 1985
Mount Kisco, NY 13,488
 22,700
 26,700
 4,106
 22,942
 30,564
 53,506
 (8,140) N/A 2007
New Hyde Park (leased through 2029)(3), NY
 
 
 4
 
 
 4
 4
 (4) 1970 1976
Newington, CT 
 2,421
 1,200
 2,052
 2,421
 3,252
 5,673
 (1,578) 1965 1965
Norfolk (leased through 2069)(3), VA
 
 
 3,927
 15
 
 3,942
 3,942
 (3,886) N/A 2005
North Bergen (Kennedy Boulevard), NJ 
 2,308
 636
 261
 2,308
 897
 3,205
 (616) 1993 1959
North Bergen (Tonnelle Avenue), NJ 100,000
 24,978
 10,462
 66,176
 34,473
 67,143
 101,616
 (18,058) 2009 2006
North Plainfield, NJ 25,100
 6,577
 13,983
 627
 6,577
 14,610
 21,187
 (4,568) 1955 1989
Paramus (leased through 2033)(3), NJ
 
 
 
 12,569
 
 12,569
 12,569
 (4,923) 
1957/
2009
 2003
Queens, NY 
 14,537
 12,304
 3,733
 14,537
 16,037
 30,574
 (1,721) N/A 2015
Rochester (Henrietta) (leased through 2056)(3), NY
 
 
 2,647
 1,293
 
 3,940
 3,940
 (3,664) 1971 1971
Rockville, MD 
 3,470
 20,599
 2,851
 3,470
 23,450
 26,920
 (8,895) N/A 2005
Revere (Wonderland), MA 
 6,323
 17,130
 
 6,323
 17,130
 23,453
 (163) N/A 2019
Salem (leased through 2102)(3), NH
 
 6,083
 
 (3,084) 2,994
 5
 2,999
 
 N/A 2006
Signal Hill, CA 
 9,652
 2,940
 1
 9,652
 2,941
 12,593
 (974) N/A 2006
South Plainfield (leased through 2039)(3), NJ
 
 
 10,044
 1,926
 
 11,970
 11,970
 (3,700) N/A 2007


    Initial cost to company   
Gross amount at which
carried at close of period
      
Description Encumbrances Land 
Building and
improvements
 
Costs
capitalized
subsequent
to acquisition
 Land 
Building and
improvements
 
Total(2)
 
Accumulated
depreciation
and
amortization(1)
 
Date of
construction
 
Date
acquired
                     
Springfield (leased through 2025)(3), PA
 
 
 
 80
 
 80
 80
 (80) N/A 2005
Staten Island, NY 
 11,446
 21,262
 4,658
 11,446
 25,920
 37,366
 (10,251) N/A 2004
Totowa, NJ 50,800
 120
 11,994
 4,883
 92
 16,905
 16,997
 (14,446) 
1957/
1999
 1957
Turnersville, NJ 
 900
 1,342
 4,057
 900
 5,399
 6,299
 (2,428) 1974 1974
Union (2445 Springfield Avenue), NJ 45,600
 19,700
 45,090
 
 19,700
 45,090
 64,790
 (14,184) N/A 2007
Union (Route 22 and Morris Avenue), NJ 
 3,025
 7,470
 7,106
 3,025
 14,576
 17,601
 (5,516) 1962 1962
Vallejo (leased through 2043)(3), CA
 
 
 2,945
 221
 
 3,166
 3,166
 (1,178) N/A 2006
Walnut Creek (1149 South Main Street), CA 
 2,699
 19,930
 (1,003) 2,699
 18,927
 21,626
 (2,221) N/A 2006
Walnut Creek (Mt. Diablo), CA 
 5,909
 
 1,340
 5,908
 1,341
 7,249
 (251) N/A 2007
Watchung, NJ 27,000
 4,178
 5,463
 2,738
 4,441
 7,938
 12,379
 (5,957) 1994 1959
Westfield, NJ 4,730
 5,728
 4,305
 (4,459) 3,349
 2,225
 5,574
 (38) N/A 2017
Wheaton (leased through 2060)(3), MD
 
 
 5,367
 
 
 5,367
 5,367
 (1,778) N/A 2006
Wilkes-Barre (461 - 499 Mundy Street), PA 
 6,053
 26,646
 (18,630) 3,133
 10,936
 14,069
 (410) N/A 2007
Woodbridge (Woodbridge Commons), NJ 22,100
 1,509
 2,675
 5,483
 1,539
 8,128
 9,667
 (3,376) 1959 1959
Woodbridge (Plaza at Woodbridge), NJ 55,340
 21,547
 75,017
 304
 21,547
 75,321
 96,868
 (7,213) N/A 2017
Wyomissing (leased through 2065)(3), PA
 
 
 2,646
 1,810
 
 4,456
 4,456
 (4,004) N/A 2005
Yonkers, NY 30,122
 63,341
 110,635
 16,339
 65,942
 124,373
 190,315
 (10,976) N/A 2017
                     
WAREHOUSES:                    
East Hanover, NJ 40,700
 576
 7,752
 31,081
 691
 38,718
 39,409
 (19,448) 1972 1972
                     
TOTAL UE PROPERTIES 1,556,248

500,746
 1,400,350
 840,123
 515,621
 2,225,598
 2,741,219
 (669,849)    
                     
Leasehold Improvements,
Equipment and Other
 
 
 
 7,566
 
 7,566
 7,566
 (2,097)    
                     
TOTAL $1,556,248
 $500,746
 $1,400,350
 $847,689
 $515,621
 $2,233,164
 $2,748,785
 $(671,946)    
(1)
Depreciation of the buildings and improvements are calculated over lives ranging from the life of the lease to forty years.
(2)
Adjusted tax basis for federal income tax purposes was $1.5 billion as of December 31, 2019.
(3)
The Company is a lessee under a ground or building lease. The building will revert to the lessor upon lease expiration.


99


Initial cost to companyGross amount at which
carried at close of period
DescriptionEncumbrancesLandBuilding and
improvements
Costs
capitalized
subsequent
to acquisition
LandBuilding and
improvements
Total(2)
Accumulated
depreciation
and
amortization(1)
Date of
construction
Date
acquired
Huntington, NY— 21,200 33,667 17,005 11,332 60,540 71,872 (8,239)N/A2007
Inwood, NY— 12,419 19,097 2,829 12,419 21,926 34,345 (9,786)N/A2004
Jersey City (Hudson Commons), NJ28,034 652 7,495 1,130 652 8,625 9,277 (4,231)19651965
Jersey City (Hudson Mall), NJ22,154 15,824 37,593 (3,267)14,289 35,861 50,150 (6,951)N/A2017
Kearny, NJ— 309 3,376 18,287 296 21,676 21,972 (7,232)19381959
Lancaster, PA— 3,140 63 2,059 3,140 2,122 5,262 (1,135)19661966
Las Catalinas, Puerto Rico123,977 15,280 64,370 5,740 11,490 73,900 85,390 (34,602)19962002
Lodi (Washington Street), NJ— 7,606 13,125 (8,813)3,823 8,095 11,918 (3,217)N/A2004
Manalapan, NJ— 725 7,189 7,240 1,046 14,108 15,154 (10,605)19711971
Manchester, MO12,500 4,409 13,756 (6,799)2,858 8,508 11,366 (708)N/A2017
Marlton, NJ37,400 1,611 3,464 14,759 1,454 18,380 19,834 (13,006)19731973
Massapequa, (portion leased through 2069)(3), NY
— 44,035 3,084 29,423 30,077 46,465 76,542 (56)N/A2020
Middletown, NJ31,400 283 5,248 2,869 283 8,117 8,400 (6,902)19631963
Millburn, NJ22,944 15,783 25,837 (578)15,783 25,259 41,042 (4,414)N/A2017
Montclair, NJ7,250 66 419 472 66 891 957 (776)19721972
Montehiedra, Puerto Rico79,381 9,182 66,751 30,012 7,951 97,994 105,945 (52,018)1996/
2015
1997
Morris Plains, NJ— 1,104 6,411 18,339 1,082 24,772 25,854 (8,426)19611985
Mount Kisco, NY12,377 22,700 26,700 4,403 23,297 30,506 53,803 (9,877)N/A2007
New Hyde Park (leased through 2029)(3), NY
— — — — (4)19701976
Newington, CT— 2,421 1,200 1,658 2,421 2,858 5,279 (1,460)19651965
Norfolk (leased through 2069)(3), VA
— — 3,927 15 — 3,942 3,942 (3,937)N/A2005
North Bergen (Kennedy Boulevard), NJ— 2,308 636 261 2,308 897 3,205 (699)19931959
North Bergen (Tonnelle Avenue), NJ100,000 24,978 10,462 67,385 33,211 69,614 102,825 (21,231)20092006
North Plainfield, NJ25,100 6,577 13,983 795 6,577 14,778 21,355 (5,518)19551989
Paramus (leased through 2033)(3), NJ
— — — 12,569 — 12,569 12,569 (6,151)1957/
2009
2003
Queens, NY— 14,537 12,304 4,284 14,537 16,588 31,125 (2,832)N/A2015
Rochester (Henrietta) (leased through 2056)(3), NY
— — 2,647 1,181 — 3,828 3,828 (3,634)19711971
Rockville, MD— 3,470 20,599 3,262 3,470 23,861 27,331 (10,523)N/A2005
Revere (Wonderland), MA— 6,323 17,130 28 6,323 17,158 23,481 (2,396)N/A2019
Salem (leased through 2102)(3), NH
— 6,083 — (1,823)2,994 1,266 4,260 (24)N/A2006
South Plainfield (leased through 2039)(3), NJ
— — 10,044 1,926 — 11,970 11,970 (4,409)N/A2007
Springfield (leased through 2025)(3), PA
— — — 80 — 80 80 (80)N/A2005
Staten Island, NY— 11,446 21,262 5,072 11,446 26,334 37,780 (11,973)N/A2004
Totowa, NJ50,800 120 11,994 5,024 92 17,046 17,138 (15,322)1957/
1999
1957
93


Initial cost to companyGross amount at which
carried at close of period
DescriptionEncumbrancesLandBuilding and
improvements
Costs
capitalized
subsequent
to acquisition
LandBuilding and
improvements
Total(2)
Accumulated
depreciation
and
amortization(1)
Date of
construction
Date
acquired
Union (2445 Springfield Avenue), NJ45,600 19,700 45,090 — 19,700 45,090 64,790 (16,439)N/A2007
Union (Route 22 and Morris Avenue), NJ— 3,025 7,470 7,192 3,025 14,662 17,687 (6,561)19621962
Walnut Creek (1149 South Main Street), CA— 2,699 19,930 (1,003)2,699 18,927 21,626 (3,559)N/A2006
Walnut Creek (Mt. Diablo), CA— 5,909 — 1,784 — 7,693 7,693 — N/A2007
Watchung, NJ26,097 4,178 5,463 2,929 4,441 8,129 12,570 (6,638)19941959
Wheaton (leased through 2060)(3), MD
— — 5,367 — — 5,367 5,367 (2,046)N/A2006
Wilkes-Barre (461 - 499 Mundy Street), PA— 6,053 26,646 (15,463)2,823 14,413 17,236 (264)N/A2007
Woodbridge (Woodbridge Commons), NJ22,100 1,509 2,675 5,637 1,539 8,282 9,821 (4,013)19591959
Woodbridge (Plaza at Woodbridge), NJ54,029 21,547 75,017 8,498 21,547 83,515 105,062 (10,870)N/A2017
Wyomissing (leased through 2065)(3), PA
— — 2,646 403 — 3,049 3,049 (2,655)N/A2005
Yonkers, NY26,774 63,341 110,635 14,596 65,940 122,632 188,572 (16,782)N/A2017
INDUSTRIAL:
East Hanover, NJ(4)
40,700 5,589 57,485 30,750 5,756 88,068 93,824 (22,177)19721972 / 2021
Lodi (Route 17 North), NJ— 238 9,446 4,212 238 13,658 13,896 (127)19991975
TOTAL UE PROPERTIES1,695,408 583,698 1,718,987 895,235 543,827 2,654,093 3,197,920 (752,152)
Leasehold Improvements,
Equipment and Other
— — — 7,530 — 7,530 7,530 (1,795)
TOTAL$1,695,408 $583,698 $1,718,987 $902,765 $543,827 $2,661,623 $3,205,450 $(753,947)
(1)Depreciation of the buildings and improvements are calculated over lives ranging from one to forty years.
(2)Adjusted tax basis for federal income tax purposes was $1.8 billion as of December 31, 2021.
(3)The Company is a lessee under a ground or building lease. The building will revert to the lessor upon lease expiration.
(4)The increase in initial cost to the Company is due to the acquisitions of 151 Ridgedale Avenue and 601 Murray Road.

94


URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES AND URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES LP
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
(Amounts in thousands)
 
The following is a reconciliation of real estate assets and accumulated depreciation:
 
Year Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Real Estate
Balance at beginning of period$2,946,817 $2,748,785 $2,768,992 
Additions during the period:
Land33,473 68,536 13,441 
Buildings & improvements200,289 145,800 31,806 
Construction in progress97,401 27,550 61,641 
 3,277,980 2,990,671 2,875,880 
Less: Impairments, assets sold, written-off or reclassified as held for sale(72,530)(43,854)(127,095)
Balance at end of period$3,205,450 $2,946,817 $2,748,785 
Accumulated Depreciation
Balance at beginning of period$730,366 $671,946 $645,872 
Additions charged to operating expenses80,288 81,691 80,774 
 810,654 753,637 726,646 
Less: Accumulated depreciation on assets sold, written-off or reclassified as held for sale(56,707)(23,271)(54,700)
Balance at end of period$753,947 $730,366 $671,946 
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Real Estate      
Balance at beginning of period $2,768,992
 $2,671,854
 $2,138,500
Additions during the period:      
Land 13,441
 4,120
 142,305
Buildings & improvements 31,806
 12,394
 389,338
Construction in progress 61,641
 118,389
 34,525
  2,875,880
 2,806,757
 2,704,668
Less: Impairments and assets sold or written-off (127,095) (37,765) (32,814)
Balance at end of period $2,748,785
 $2,768,992
 $2,671,854
Accumulated Depreciation      
Balance at beginning of period $645,872
 $587,127
 $541,077
Additions charged to operating expenses 80,774
 80,578
 65,140
  726,646
 667,705
 606,217
Less: Accumulated depreciation on assets written-off (54,700) (21,833) (19,090)
Balance at end of period $671,946
 $645,872
 $587,127



10095