UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-K 
ýANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20142017
OR
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from              to              
Commission file number 001-11073
 
FIRST DATA CORPORATION 
 
DELAWARE 47-0731996
(State of incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
225 LIBERTY STREET, 29th FLOOR, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10281
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (800) 735-3362
 
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes oý  No ýo
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.  Yes ýo  No o *ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes oý  No ý *o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes ý  No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ýo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ox
 
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer xo
 
Smaller Reporting Companyo
Emerging Growth Company o
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes o  No ý
TheIndicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
ClassOutstanding at January 31, 2018
Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share482,944,477 shares
Class B Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share443,274,651 shares

As of June 30, 2017 (the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter), the aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting stockClass A Common Stock held by non-affiliates is zero. Theof the registrant is privately held. There were 1,000 shareswas $6.9 billion (based on the closing price of the registrant's Class A Common Stock on that date as reported on the New York Stock Exchange).
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s common stock outstanding asProxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of January 31, 2015.Shareholders to be held on May 10, 2018 are incorporated by reference in Part III.
 
* The registrant has not been subject to the filing requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act since January 1, 2015; however, registrant filed all reports since that date that would have been required to be filed if it were subject to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

1





INDEX
 
   
PAGE
NUMBER
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
  
 
 
 
 
 
    
  
 
    
 

Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, financial data in this Form 10-K reflects the consolidated business and operations of First Data Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. Unless the context otherwise requires, all references herein to “First Data,” “FDC,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us” refer to First Data Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Amounts in this Form 10-K and the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K are presented in U.S. Dollars rounded to the nearest million, unless otherwise noted.

2





Forward-Looking Statements
 
Certain matters we discuss in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in other public statements may constitute forward-looking statements. You can identify forward-looking statements because they contain words such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seeks,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” or “anticipates” or similar expressions which concern our strategy, plans, projections or intentions. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, all statements we make relating to revenue, EBITDA,earnings before net interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), earnings, margins, growth rates, and other financial results for future periods. By their nature, forward-looking statements:statements speak only as of the date they are made; are not statements of historical fact or guarantees of future performance; and are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions or changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict or quantify. Actual results could differ materially and adversely from our forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including the following: (1) adverse impacts from global economic, political, and other conditions affecting trends in consumer, business, and government spending; (2) our ability to anticipate and respond to changing industry trends, including technological changes and increasing competition; (3) our ability to successfully renew existing client contracts on favorable terms and obtain new clients; (4) our ability to prevent a material breach of security of any of our systems; (5) our ability to implement and improve processing systems to provide new products, improve functionality, and increase efficiencies; (2) our ability to prevent a material breach(6) the successful management of security of any of our systems; (3) our ability to anticipate and respond to technological changes, particularly with respect to e-commerce and mobile commerce; (4) our high degree of leverage; (5) credit and fraud risks in our business units and the merchant alliances, particularly in the context of e-commerce and mobile markets; (6) our merchant alliance program which involves several alliances not under our sole control and each of which acts independently of the others; (7) our successful management of credit and fraud risks in our business units and merchant alliances, particularly in the impactcontext of new laws, regulations, credit card association ruleseCommerce and mobile markets; (8) consolidation among financial institution clients or other industry standards; (8)client groups that impacts our client relationships; (9) our ability to use our net operating losses without restriction to offset income for US tax purposes; (10) our ability to improve our profitability and maintain flexibility in our capital resources through the implementation of cost savings initiatives; (11) the acquisition or disposition of a material business or assets; (12) our ability to successfully value and integrate acquired businesses; (13) our high degree of leverage; (14) adverse impacts from currency exchange rates or currency controls imposed by any government or otherwise; (9) our ability to successfully convert accounts under service contracts with major clients; (10)(15) changes in the interest rate environment that increasesincrease interest on our borrowings or the interest rate at which we can refinance our borrowings; (11) consolidation among client financial institutions(16) the impact of new or changes in current laws, regulations, credit card association rules, or other client groups that impacts our client relationships; (12) catastrophic events that impact our or our major customers’ operating facilities, communication systems,industry standards; and technology; (13)(17) new lawsuits, investigations, or proceedings, or changes to our potential exposure in connection with pending lawsuits, investigations or proceedings, and various other factors discussed throughout this report, including but not limited to, Item 1 - Business, Item 1A - Risk Factors, and Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Except as required by law, we do not intend to revise or update any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.



3





PART I 
ITEM 1.    BUSINESS
 
General
 
First Data Corporation (we or our) is asits at the center of global providerelectronic commerce. We believe we offer our clients the most complete array of electronicintegrated solutions in the industry, covering their needs across next-generation commerce technologies, merchant acquiring, issuing, and payment solutions for merchants,network solutions. We serve our clients in over 100 countries, reaching over 6 million business locations and over 4,000 financial institutions. We believe we have the industry’s largest distribution network, driven by our partnerships with many of the world’s leading financial institutions, our direct sales force, and card issuers with operationsa network of distribution partners. We are the largest merchant acquirer, issuer processor, and independent network services provider in 34 countries, servingthe world, enabling businesses to accept electronic payments, helping financial institutions issue credit, debit and prepaid cards, and routing secure transactions between them. In 2017, we processed 93 billion transactions globally, or approximately 6.2 million merchant locations. We were incorporated in Delaware in 1989 and were3,000 per second. In our largest market, the subjectUnited States, we processed approximately $2.1 trillion of an initial public offering in connection with a spin-off from American Express in 1992. On September 24, 2007, we were acquired through a merger transaction with an entity controlled by affiliatespayment volume, which represents over 10% of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (KKR) that resulted in our equity becoming privately held.United States gross domestic product (GDP) last year.

We have operations and offices located within the United States (U.S.) (domestic) and outside of the U.S. (international) where sales, customer service and/or administrative personnel are based. Revenues generatedTotal revenues from processing domestic and international transactions regardlessas a percentage of the segments to which the associatedtotal revenues applied, were 85% and 15% of our consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2014, respectively. Long-livedtotal long lived assets attributable to domestic and international operations as percentagesa percentage of our total long-livedlong lived assets, asare displayed in the below table.
 Year ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Total generated from processing transactions:     
   Domestic85% 85% 86%
   International15% 15% 14%
Long-lived assets attributable to operations:     
   Domestic89% 89% 89%
   International11% 11% 11%

No country outside the US is greater than 10% of December 31, 2014 were 88% and 12%, respectively. No individual international country is material to our total revenues or long-lived assets.assets during any of the years presented in the above table. Further financial information relating to our international and domestic revenues and long-lived assets is set forth in Note 13note 7 "Segment Information" to our Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Our business is characterized by transaction and account related fees, multi-year contracts, and a diverse client base, which allows us to grow alongside our clients. Our multi-year contracts allow us to achieve a high level of recurring revenues with the same clients. While the contracts typically do not specify fixed revenues to be realized thereunder, they do provide a framework for revenues to be generated based on volume of services provided during such contract's term. Our business also generally requires minimal incremental capital expenditures and working capital to support additional revenue within our existing business lines.

Products and Services SegmentSegments Information

We are organized inprovide a range of solutions to businesses and financial institutions across the value chain of commerce-enabling services and technologies. We deliver our value-added solutions from a suite of proprietary technology products, software, cloud-based applications, processing services, security offerings, and customer support programs that we configure to meet our clients' individual needs.

We operate three segments: MerchantGlobal Business Solutions (GBS), Global Financial Services,Solutions (GFS), and International.Network & Security Solutions (NSS). Our segments are designed to establish global lines of businesses that support our global client base and allow us to further globalize our solutions while working seamlessly with our geographic teams across our regions: the United States and Canada (North America); Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA); Latin America (LATAM); and Asia Pacific (APAC) and be supported by a corporate team focused on company-wide issues.

Global Business Solutions - GBS provides a wide-range of solutions to merchants. These solutions include retail point-of-sale merchant acquiring and eCommerce services as well as next-generation offerings such as mobile payment services,

4





and our cloud-based Clover point-of-sale operating system, which includes a marketplace for proprietary and third-party business applications.

Global Financial Solutions - GFS provides technology solutions for bank and non-bank issuers. These solutions include general purpose credit, retail private label, commercial card, and loan processing within the United States and international markets, as well as licensed financial software systems, such as our VisionPLUS processing application. GFS also provides financial institutions with a suite of account services including card personalization and embossing, customer communications, remittance processing, professional services, and customer servicing, including call center solutions and back office processing.

Network & Security Solutions - NSS provides a wide range of value-added solutions that we sell to clients in our GBS and GFS segments, smaller financial institutions, and other enterprise clients. These solutions include our EFT network solutions, such as our STAR Network, our debit card processing solutions, our Stored Value Network solutions, such as Money Network, Gift Solutions and our Security and Fraud solutions, such as TransArmor and TeleCheck. NSS also supports our other digital strategies, including online and mobile banking, and our business supporting mobile wallets.

See "Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for a detailed explanation of our operating results. Segment products and services are illustrated below:
The segments’ profit measure is a form of EBITDA (earnings before net interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization). A discussion of factors potentially affecting our operations is set forth in Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Form 10-K.

We do not have any significant customers that account for 10% or more of total consolidated revenues. Refer to the following segment discussions, which address significant customer relationships within each segment.

Merchant Solutions segment
5





Overview of Payment Processing

The Merchantprocessing of a traditional card transaction includes two sub-processes: (1) capture and authorization and (2) clearing and settlement. Below is an illustrative diagram of the flow of a typical card transaction and an explanation of each step in the process.

Capture and Authorization

In the capture and authorization process, the business obtains approval for payment from the card issuing bank. This process includes the following steps:

1.Once the consumer is ready to make a purchase, he or she presents their card for payment;
2.The card is swiped in the Point-of-Sale (POS) device at the business location, which captures the account information contained on the card's magnetic stripe or Europay, MasterCard and Visa (EMV) - compliant chip;
In a mobile commerce transaction facilitated by a mobile wallet, such as Apple Pay, the appropriate card details are stored virtually on an application on the phone and transmitted to the POS device through a chip equipped with near-field communication (NFC) technology;
In an eCommerce transaction, the POS device is replaced by a virtual terminal application and the consumer types the card number into the check-out page of the online storefront. In some circumstances, an online wallet, such as PayPal, may be used to transmit the appropriate payment credentials;
3.The customer's card details are transmitted from the POS to the merchant acquirer, or the merchant acquirer's processor, via an internet connection or a phone line;

6





In an eCommerce transaction, the information is encrypted and then transmitted to the merchant acquirer, or merchant acquirer's processor, via an online gateway;
4.
The merchant acquirer, or the merchant acquirer's processor, identifies the appropriate payment network affiliated with the card, such as Visa, MasterCard, or STAR, and forwards the card details to the appropriate network;
5.The payment network receives the request for payment authorization, identifies the appropriate card issuing bank, and routes the transaction to the bank or its issuer processor;
6.The card issuing bank, or its issuer processor, receives the request and then executes a series of inquiries into its account systems to assess the potential risk of fraud for the transaction, establish that the account is in good standing, and verify that the cardholder has sufficient credit or adequate funds to cover the amount of the transaction;
7.The card issuing bank, or its issuer processor, approves or declines the transaction and sends back the response to the payment network. In this example the transaction is approved;
8.The payment network receives the approval and forwards the authorization to the merchant acquirer, or merchant acquirer's processor; and
9.The merchant acquirer, or merchant acquirer's processor, sends the authorization back to the POS device at the business location, which provides an approval confirmation and prints a receipt;
In a mobile commerce transaction, the approval confirmation and receipt may also be transmitted to the consumer's mobile wallet application or to the consumer via email;
In an eCommerce transaction, the authorization is sent to the online storefront, which communicates the approval to the consumer on the screen, and may provide the receipt for printing online or via email.

Clearing and Settlement

In the clearing and settlement process, a request for payment is initiated, funds are transferred and the transaction is posted to the business owner's and the consumer's account statements. The clearing and settlement process includes the following steps:

10.Typically at the end of the day, the business submits a batch of all of its approved authorizations to the merchant acquirer, or the merchant acquirer's processor, through a function on its POS device;
In the case of an eCommerce business, the online storefront's gateway sends the batch to the merchant acquirer, or to the merchant acquirer's processor;
11.The merchant acquirer, or the merchant acquirer's processor, receives the batch, notes the final amounts due for settlement, and routes the batch of approved authorizations to each applicable payment network;
12.Each payment network sends the batch of approved authorizations to the applicable card issuing bank, or its issuer processor, which posts the transaction to the consumer's statement;
13.Typically within 48 hours, the payment network calculates net settlement positions for the merchant acquirer and the card issuing bank, sends advisements to the merchant acquirer and card issuing bank, and submits a fund transfer order to a settlement bank; and
14.The settlement bank facilitates the exchange of funds between the merchant acquirer and the card issuing bank; and the merchant acquirer transfers the funds to the business owner's account.

Global Business Solutions segment is comprised of merchant acquiring and processing services, prepaid services and check verification, settlement, and guarantee services.Segment

The following table presents Merchant SolutionsGBS information as a percentage of total segment revenue and All Other and Corporate:segment EBITDA:
  Year ended December  31,
  2014
2013
2012
Segment revenues from external customers 52% 53% 53%
Segment EBITDA 63% 67% 65%
Assets (as of December 31) 69% 68% 68%
  Year ended December  31,
  2017
2016
2015
Segment revenue 57% 57% 58%
Segment EBITDA 59% 60% 62%

See note 7 "Segment Information" to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a detail of segment revenue and segment EBITDA results.

DescriptionGlobal Business Solutions Operations Our largest segment, GBS, provides businesses of Merchant Solutions segment operations Merchant Solutions businesses facilitate the acceptanceall sizes and types with a wide range of consumer transactionssolutions at the point of sale, (POS),including merchant acquiring, eCommerce, mobile commerce, POS, and other business solutions. We served approximately 3.6 million business locations in the United States and 2.7 million outside the United States. GBS' largest service is merchant acquiring, which facilitates the acceptance of commercial transactions at the POS, whether it is a retail transaction at a physical merchantbusiness location, over the Internet ora mobile commerce transaction through a mobile (i.e. phone or tablet) device.
Merchant acquiringtablet device, or an eCommerce transaction over the Internet. In 2017, we processed $2.1 trillion of payment volume in the United States and processing services Merchant acquiring services facilitateover $300 billion of payment volume outside the merchants’ ability to accept credit, debit, stored-value and loyalty cards by authorizing, capturing, and settling the merchants’ transactions. Acquiring services also provide POS devices and other equipment necessary to capture merchant transactions. The segment’s processing services include authorization, transaction capture, settlement, chargeback handling, and Internet-based transaction processing. The vast majority of these services pertain to transactions in which consumer payments to merchants are made through a payment network (such as VISA or MasterCard), a debit network (such as STAR Network, which is owned by us), or other payment issuers/networks (such as American Express and Discover).United States.


47






GBS employs a variety of go-to-market strategies. GBS operates direct sales teams and also partners with indirect non-bank sales forces, such as independent sales agents, independent sales organizations (ISOs), independent software vendors (ISVs), value added retailers (VARs), and payment services providers (PSPs) to sell our commerce solutions to Small and Medium Sized Business (SMBs). In addition, GBS leverages the powerful sales capabilities of its bank partners to go to market through several structures, including joint venture equity alliances, revenue sharing alliances, and referral agreements.

GBS segment revenues are primarily derived from processing credit and debit card transactions for merchants and other business clients and includes fees for providing processing, loyalty and software services, and sales and leases of POS devices. Revenues are generated from a variety of sources:sources, including:

discountDiscount fees charged to a merchant, net of credit and debit card interchange and assessment fees charged by the payment networks. The discount fee is typically either a percentage of the credit card transactionpurchase amount or thean interchange fee plus a fixed dollar amount;
processingProcessing fees charged to unconsolidated alliances discussed below;our alliances; 
processingProcessing fees charged to merchant acquirers who have outsourced their transaction processing to us;
sellingSales and leasingleases of POS devices;  
Fees from providing reporting and other services; and
Software fees such as security applications and Clover related fees.
debit network fees.
We typically provide these services as part of a broader commerce-enabling solution to our business clients across multiple channels, including:
Most
Retail POS - Physical businesses or storefront locations, such as retailers, supermarkets, restaurants, and petroleum stations, with brick and mortar facilities; 
Mobile POS - Physical businesses with remote or wireless storefront locations, such as small retailers and service providers that use mobile devices to accept electronic payments; and 
Online POS (eCommerce) - Online businesses or website locations, such as retailers, digital content providers, and mobile app developers with Internet-based storefronts that can be accessed through a personal computer or a mobile device.

Clover Operating System Clover is an open architecture, integrated POS operating system, with a full suite of Merchant Solution’s revenue is derived from regionalintegrated hardware and local merchants. The items listed above are included in our consolidated revenuessoftware offerings. With Clover, we have designed one of the largest open architecture platforms of commerce-enabling solutions and for equity earnings from unconsolidated alliances, the “Equity earnings in affiliates” line itemapplications in the Consolidated Statementsworld. The family of Operations. The Merchant Solutions segment revenue and EBITDA are presented using proportionate consolidation; accordingly, segment revenue alsoClover devices includes the alliance partner’s shareClover Station, Clover Mobile, Clover Mini, Clover Go, and now Clover Flex; each providing a broad range of processing fees chargednext-generation features and software applications designed to consolidated alliances. In addition, segment revenue excludes debit network fees and other reimbursable items. Throughout the document we use the word “partner” to describe situations wherehelp business clients conduct commerce.

Through December 31, 2017, we have shipped over 750,000 Clover devices and the current Clover platform processes approximately $50 billion in payment volume annually. Within Clover, we also offer a contractual relationshipcloud-based Clover App Market for business applications. Our application marketplace is designed specifically to provide merchants with another company. These relationships do notintegrated software applications that they can download and install quickly and easily on their Clover devices. As of December 31, 2017, the Clover App Market has over 300 active applications. We already offer Clover throughout North America and within numerous countries in EMEA, and we are in the process of rolling Clover out to other international regions. Furthermore, we believe Clover improves client retention because it becomes core to our clients' businesses, and positions us as a value-added partner. For example, business owners may use applications in the Clover App Market to manage their employees' work schedules, operate customer loyalty programs, integrate transaction information directly into their accounting software, manage inventory, and provide analytics on their business.
Global Business Solutions Competition GBS competes with merchant acquirers that include equity ownership.  In situations where equity ownerships are involved, we generally referWorldpay and Global Payments, in addition to the arrangement/entity as an affiliate. 
Merchant Solutions provides merchantfinancial institutions that provide acquiring and processing services prepaid services and check verification, guarantee, and settlement services to merchants that operate approximately 3.9 million merchant locations across the U.S. and acquired $1.7 trillion of payment transaction dollar volumebusinesses on behalftheir own, such as Chase Paymentech Solutions, Elavon (a subsidiary of U.S. merchants in 2014. Merchant Solutions provides full service merchant processing primarily for transactions of VISA,Bancorp), and Barclaycard. In many cases, our alliance and commercial partners compete against each other. Additionally, payment networks such as Visa and MasterCard and a variety of personal identification number (PIN) debit networks at the POS.
Merchant Solutions approaches the market through diversified sales channels including equity alliances, and its other contractual revenue sharing and/or referral arrangements with more than 400 financial institution partners, more than 1,700 non-bank referral partners, and more than 600 independent sales organization partners, as of December 31, 2014. Growth in the Merchant Solutions business is derived from entering into new merchant relationships, reducing the turnover in existing merchant relationships, new and enhanced product and service offerings, cross sellingare increasingly offering products and services into existing relationships,that compete with our suite of solutions. Competitors of our next-generation services include PayPal, Braintree (a subsidiary of PayPal), CyberSource (a subsidiary of Visa Inc.), Adyen, and Stripe, along with integrated point of sale providers such as Micros, Square, and others.

The primary competitive factors impacting GBS are brand, data security, breadth of features and functionality, ease of technological integration, strength of financial institution partnerships, price, and servicing capability. Other factors impacting GBS include consolidation among large businesses and financial institutions, the shiftpace of consumer spending to increased usageintegrated point of electronic forms of payment,sale solution development, and the strengthcreation of our alliancesnew payment methods and relationships with banks and other entities. Our alliance structures take on different forms, including consolidated subsidiaries, equity method investments, and contractual revenue sharing and/or referral arrangements. Under the alliance and referral programs, the alliance/referral partners typically act as a merchant referral source. We benefit by providing processing services for the alliance/referral partners and their merchant customers. Both we and the alliance may provide management, sales, marketing, and other administrative services. The alliance strategy could be affected by consolidation among financial institutions.
Our strategy with banks, independent sales organizations, and referral/sales partners provides us with broad geographic coverage, regionally and nationally, as well as presence and expertise in various industries. The alliance/referral partner structure allows us to be the processor for multiple financial institutions, any one of which may be selected by the merchant as their bank partner. Additionally, bank partners provide brand loyalty and a distribution channel through their branch networks which increases merchant retention.
In 2014, Merchant Solutions rolled out Small Business Solutions (SBS), a program designed to help small to medium sized businesses (SMBs) better manage their business. The new SBS is integrated into Clover Station, our proprietary tablet-based hardware solution, and allows SMBs to manage inventory, track revenues, and generate reports that distill transaction data into powerful intelligence. Merchants can customize and grow their Clover Station’s capabilities by adding applications from the Clover App Market. The SBS also includes features such as analytics, TransArmor, a transaction processing encryption and tokenization technology, and Perka, a cloud-hosted mobile loyalty marketing program.related technologies.

There are a number of different entities involved in a merchant transaction including the cardholder, card issuer, card network, merchant, merchant acquirer, electronic processor for credit and signature debit transactions, and debit network for PIN-debit transactions. The card issuer is the financial institution that issues credit or debit cards, authorizes transactions after determining whether the cardholder has sufficient available credit or funds for the transaction, and provides funds for the

58





transaction. SomeGlobal Business Solutions Seasonality GBS experiences a modest level of these functions may be performedseasonality, with the first quarter representing the lowest level of sales and the fourth quarter representing the highest level of sales. Over the past eight quarters, GBS' quarterly revenue as a percentage of total yearly revenue has ranged between 24% and 26%.

Global Business Solutions Geographic Mix and Revenues GBS generates approximately 77% of its revenues from clients in our North America region, 13% from clients in the EMEA region, 6% from clients in our LATAM region, and 4% from clients in our APAC region. GBS revenues and earnings are impacted by an electronic processor (such as our Financial Services business) on behalfthe number of transactions and payment volume, the mix of consumer usage of credit cards, debit cards, and the size of the issuer.business.

Global Business Solutions Acquisitions and Dispositions On May 1, 2017, we acquired Accullink Inc. (Acculynk), a leading technology company that delivers eCommerce solutions for debit card acceptance, for $85 million, net of cash acquired. The card networks, VISA or MasterCard, aacquisition included Acculynk's PaySecure debit network or anotherrouting technology and its range of other services.

On July 6, 2017, we acquired CardConnect Corp. (CardConnect) for $763 million, net of cash acquired. CardConnect is an innovative provider of payment issuer/network route transactions between ourselvesprocessing and the card issuer. The merchant is a business from which a product or service is purchased by a cardholder. The acquirer (such as us ortechnology solutions and was one of our alliances) contractslargest distribution partners. The transaction is expected to enable us to bring innovative partner management tools to improve merchant retention, accelerate our firm-wide independent software vendor (ISV) initiative and bring immediate capabilities in enterprise resource planning (ERP) integrated payment solutions to our customers.

On December 1, 2017, we acquired BluePay Holdings, Inc. (BluePay) for $759 million, net of cash acquired. BluePay is a provider of technology-enabled payment processing for merchants in the U.S. and Canada and was one of our largest distribution partners with merchantsa strong focus on software-enabled payments and card-not-present transactions.  The transaction is expected to facilitate their acceptancebe highly complementary to our earlier acquisition of cards. ACardConnect and enhance our suite of innovative partner management tools to improve merchant acquirer may do its own processing or, more commonly, may outsource those functionsretention, accelerate our firm-wide ISV initiative and bring immediate capabilities in ERP integrated payment solutions to an electronic processor such as our Merchant Solutions segment. The acquirer/processor serves as an intermediary between the merchant and the card issuer by:customers.
(1)collecting cardholder data and transaction information from the merchant's POS device;

(2)transmitting the transaction information to the card issuer through the applicable payment network;

(3)obtaining authorization from the card issuer through a card network or debit network; and
(4)
paying the merchant for the transaction. We typically receive the funds from the issuer via the card network, payment network or debit network before paying the merchant.
A transaction occurs when a cardholder purchases a product or service from a merchant who has contracted with us, an alliance partner or a processing customer. WhenOn September 30, 2016, we completed the merchant swipes the card through the POS device (which is often sold or leased, and serviced by us), we obtain authorization for the transaction from the card issuer through the payment or debit network, verifying that the cardholder has sufficient credit or adequate funds for the transaction. Once the card issuer approvessale of our Australian ATM business. Associated with the transaction, we orrecognized a $34 million loss on the alliance acquire the transaction from the merchantsale.

See note 12 "Acquisitions and then transmit itDispositions" to the applicable payment or debit network,our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for more details relating to these acquisitions.

Global Financial Solutions Segment

The following table presents GFS information as a percentage of total segment revenue and segment EBITDA:
 Year ended December 31,
 2017
2016
2015
Segment revenue22% 22% 21%
Segment EBITDA22% 22% 20%

See note 7 "Segment Information" to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a detail of segment revenue and segment EBITDA results.

Global Financial Solutions Operations GFS provides financial institutions, which then routes the transaction informationinclude bank and non-bank issuers such as retailers with proprietary card portfolios, with a broad range of technology solutions that enable them to theoffer financial products and solutions to their customers. GFS serves over 1,400 clients globally and delivers value to clients through a variety of channels, including end-to-end outsourced processing, managed services, and various software delivery models utilizing our proprietary VisionPLUS solution. GFS services include credit card issuer. Upon receiptand loan account processing, commercial payments, customer communications, plastics solutions, remittance processing, customer servicing, and other products to support issuers. In 2017, we processed 11 billion transactions on our platforms. As of December 31, 2017, GFS managed 906 million card accounts on file in North America, up 6% over 2016 and 170 million card accounts on file outside North America, up 13% over 2016.

GFS clients include some of the transaction, theworld's largest financial institutions, which we serve in approximately 100 countries. Our largest service in GFS is outsourced issuer processing, which helps banks and non-bank issuers provide credit, commercial, and retail card issuer delivers fundsprograms to us via the payment or debit network. Generally, we fund the merchant after receiving the money from the payment or debit network. Each participant in the transaction receives compensationtheir account holders, as well as loan programs. GFS also provides licensed software solutions for financial processing the transaction. For example, in a credit card transaction using a VISA or MasterCard for $100.00 with an interchange rate of 1.5%, the card issuer will fund the payment network $98.50 and bill the cardholder $100.00 on their monthly statement. The card network will retain assessment fees of approximately $0.10 and forward $98.40activities to us. We will retain, for example, $0.40 and pay the merchant $98.00. The $1.50 retained by the card issuer is referred to as interchange and it, like assessment fees, is set by the card network. The $0.40 we receive represents our spreadfinancial institutions globally. Depending on the transaction,market, our solutions are often bundled with related offerings, such as customer communications and is negotiated between the merchantpersonalization of plastic cards, settlement and us.back office support, outsourced


69





billing, remittance processing, and customer service support. As part of these solutions, we also provide professional services, including custom programming and development, to clients.

GFS revenues are primarily derived from outsourced processing services, print, plastics, and remittance services, and VisionPLUS software services provided to financial institutions. GFS' revenues are typically generated on the basis of number of total and active accounts on file, volume of customer communications, volume of plastics issued or license fees.

Outsourced Processing and Licensing Outsourced processing and licensing provide solutions to financial institutions and other issuers of credit, such as banks, group service providers, retailers, consumer finance companies, and credit unions. These services enable issuers to process transactions on behalf of customers. Depending on our clients' needs and the market, we deliver these solutions through our proprietary outsourced services platforms, software application licenses, or software-as-a-service hosted in the cloud. Services in our proprietary platform include transaction authorization and posting, account maintenance, and settlement. Our VisionPLUS software is used globally as both a processing solution and a licensed software solution that enables clients to process their own transactions, depending on the market. We also enable merchants and financial institutions to offer next generation payment solutions to their clients, such as Apple Pay, Android Pay, and Samsung Pay.

Revenues for outsourced issuer processing services are derived from fees payable under contracts that depend primarily on the number of cardholder accounts on file. More revenue is derived from active accounts (those accounts on file that had a balance or any monetary posting or authorization activity during a specified period) than inactive accounts. Revenues are also derived from licensing fees for our alliances,VisionPLUS application, as merchant acquirers/processors, have certain contingent liabilitieswell as cardholder and data transactions and professional services such as custom programming and development.

Account Support Services Along with our processing and licensing solutions, we provide a variety of supporting services throughout the life cycle of each account. Services include processing a card application, initiating services for the cardholder to enable the cardholder to transact, accumulating the card's transactions acquiredinto a monthly billing statement, and posting cardholder payments. Other services provided include customized communications to cardholders, plastics personalization and mailing, information verification associated with granting credit, debt collection, remittance processing, and customer service on behalf of financial institutions. We also provide programming and customization to enhance and tailor our solutions to clients' needs through professional services.

Global Financial Solutions Competition GFS competes with card issuer processors, such as Total System Services, Worldpay, Fidelity National Information Services, Fiserv, Worldline, and SIX Payment Services, as well as the card issuer processing businesses of the global payment networks such as Visa and Mastercard. In addition, we compete with various software or custom designed solutions that some financial institutions use to perform these services in-house.

The primary competitive factors impacting GFS are system performance and reliability, digital solutions, data security, breadth of features and functionality, disaster recovery capabilities and business continuity preparedness, platform scalability and flexibility, price, and servicing capability. Market events that impact GFS include financial institution consolidation and portfolio transactions between financial institutions.

Global Financial Solutions Seasonality GFS experiences a modest level of seasonality, with the first quarter representing the lowest level of sales and the fourth quarter representing the highest level of sales. Over the past eight quarters, GFS' quarterly revenue as a percentage of total yearly revenue has ranged between 24% and 26%.

Global Financial Solutions Geographic Mix and Revenues GFS generates 59% of its revenues from merchants. This contingent liability arisesclients in our North America region, 27% from clients in our EMEA region, 8% from clients in our LATAM region, and 6% from clients in our APAC region. Within the United States, revenues are diversified across major financial institutions of various sizes and geographies across the country.

Global Financial Solutions Acquisitions and Dispositions On September 27, 2017, we divested all of our businesses in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia for €73 million (approximately $85 million). Associated with the transaction, we recognized a $4 million loss on the sale.

See note 12 "Acquisitions and Dispositions" to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for more details relating to this disposition.



10





Network & Security Solutions Segment

The following table presents NSS information as a percentage of total segment revenue and segment EBITDA:
 Year ended December 31,
 2017
2016
2015
Segment revenue21% 21% 21%
Segment EBITDA24% 23% 23%

See note 7 "Segment Information" to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a detail of segment revenue and segment EBITDA results.

Network & Security Solutions Operations NSS provides a range of network solutions and security, risk and fraud management solutions to business and financial institution clients in our GBS and GFS segments, and independently to financial institutions, businesses, governments, processors and other clients. Our EFT Network Solutions manages U.S. debit card and account processing solutions. Our STAR Network enables clients to encrypt, route, and decrypt PIN debit, PIN-less debit, and ATM transactions, and provide access to demand deposit accounts. In 2017, our STAR Network routed approximately 4.3 billion transactions in the eventUnited States. Our Stored Value Network Solutions facilitate stored value commerce, such as (1) closed-loop prepaid transactions, which are initiated by various types of prepaid cards issued by enterprises, such as retailers, that issue enterprise-branded cards that can generally be used only at the enterprise issuing the card or account, and (2) open-loop prepaid transactions, which are initiated by various types of prepaid cards issued by a billing disputebank and carry a network association brand, such as Visa, MasterCard and STAR, enabling them to be used at multiple merchant locations. NSS also includes our Online and Mobile Banking Solutions, Healthcare Solutions, and Government Solutions.

EFT Network Solutions enables our business and financial institution clients to route secure, encrypted data between themselves. Our STAR Network is connected to over 3,000 financial institutions and community banks, approximately 1.1 million POS and ATM locations, and numerous third-party payment processors, ATM processors, and card processors that participate in the network. When a business, a merchant acquirer, or an ATM owner acquires a STAR Network transaction, it sends the transaction data to the network switch, which is operated by us, which in turn routes the encrypted information to the appropriate financial institution for authorization. To be routed through the STAR Network, a transaction must be initiated with a card participating in the STAR Network at an ATM or POS device also participating in the STAR Network.

Revenues related to the STAR Network are derived from fees payable under contracts and negotiated rate structures but are driven more by the number of transactions processed than by accounts on file. In a situation in which a debit transaction uses our network and we are the debit card processor for the financial institution as well as the merchant and acquirer for the business, we are eligible to receive one or more of the following:

a cardholder that is ultimately resolved in the cardholder’s favor. In such a case, the transaction is “charged back” to the merchant and the disputed amount is credited or otherwise refunded to the cardholder. We may, however, collect this amountfee from the card network ifissuing financial institution for running the amount was disputed in error. If we ortransaction through the alliance is unable to collect this amountSTAR Network
a fee from the merchant, due tocard issuer for obtaining the merchant’s insolvency orauthorization; 
a fee from the business for acquiring the transaction, recognized in GBS; and 
a network acquirer fee from the business for accessing the STAR Network.

There are other reasons,possible configurations of transactions that result in us receiving multiple fees for a transaction, depending on the role we or the alliance will bear the loss for the amount of the refund paid to the cardholder. In most cases, this contingent liability situation is unlikely to arise because most products or services are delivered when purchased, and credits are issued on returned items. However, where the product or service is not provided until sometime following the purchase (e.g., airline or cruise ship tickets), the risk is greater. We often mitigate our risk by obtaining collateral from merchants that are considered higher risk because they have a time delay in the delivery of services, operate in industries that experience chargebacks or are less creditworthy.play.

Prepaid servicesStored Value Network First Data Prepaid Services manages prepaid stored-value card issuance and processing services (i.e., gift cards) for retailers and others. The full-service stored-value/gift card program offers transaction processing services, card issuance, and customer service for over 200 national brands and several thousand small and mid-tier merchants. We also provide program management and processing services for association-branded, bank-issued, open loop (a card that can be used at multiple merchants), stored-value, reloadable, and one time prepaid card products. Revenues are generated from a variety of sources including processing fees for transactions processed and fees for card production and shipments.

Our commercial prepaid offerings are primarily sold to businesses and are comprised of:

Gift Solutions - Includes ValueLink, Gyft, and Transaction Wireless.
ValueLink - Provides card and account issuing, program management, and transaction processing services for a range of prepaid card programs. Our closed-loop prepaid programs include gift, incentive, and rebate cards. We serve over 200 brands globally and several thousand SMBs. Our programs include reloadable and non-

11





reloadable prepaid cards, and may be used with a variety of mobile applications.
Gyft - A leading digital platform that enables consumers to buy, send, manage, and redeem virtual closed-loop cards using mobile devices. The Gyft solution, combined with our leadership in prepaid issuing solutions, creates a unique combination to support growth in a rapidly expanding market for virtual cards.
Transaction Wireless - A leading digital platform that enables businesses to sell virtual gift cards online, either to consumers through an integration with their eCommerce storefront, or to other businesses through a proprietary business-to-business solution.

Payroll Solutions - Includes Money Network offers prepaid products to address the needs of employers, employees, merchants, and unbanked individuals. Money Networkwhich provides open loopopen-loop electronic payroll distribution solutions that reduce or eliminate an employer’semployer's expense associated with traditional paper paychecks and helps employees without bank accounts avoid check cashing fees. The solution also provides important employee security as wellthe funds are stored on the account, not as other prepaid retail solutions.cash that can be lost or stolen. Money Network accounts can be used at any business location that accepts Visa, MasterCard, or STAR branded cards, includes a packet of checks to be used to pay bills and avoid the cost of money orders, and offers a web portal to track account activity.

Security and Fraud Solutions provides a range of security, risk, and fraud management solutions that help businesses and financial institutions securely run and grow their business by protecting their data, managing risk, and preventing fraud. Our solutions include TransArmor, our encryption, tokenization, and PCI compliance solution for POS data in-transit, Fraud Predictor Plus, our solution to detect fraud at the POS through a machine-learning based predictive model, and TeleCheck, the industry-leading database of check-writers activity. Revenues for our security solutions are generated fromearned on a variety of sources including network interchange revenue from use of cards and certain cardholder transaction fees.fee for licensed basis or per transaction.

Check verification, settlement, and guarantee servicesTeleCheck TeleCheck offers check verification, settlement, and guarantee services using our proprietary database system to assist merchants in deciding whether accepting checks at the POS is a reasonable risk, or, further, to guarantee checks presented to merchants if they are approved. These services include risk management services, which utilize software, information, and analysis to assist the merchant in the decision process and include identity fraud prevention and reduction. Revenues are earned by charging merchant fees for check verification or guarantee services.

Network & Security Solutions Competition NSS competes with networks such as Visa, MasterCard, and Discover for debit network services, and with Fidelity National Information Services for debit network and check verification and guarantee services. We also face competition from regional operators of debit networks. Our portfolio of security and risk management solutions competes with a wide range of providers across multiple disciplines, including Visa, MasterCard, Voltage, Verisk, Equifax, Experian, TransUnion, and Fair Isaac.

The majority of our services involve providing check guarantee services for checks received by merchants. Under the guarantee service, when a merchant receives a check as payment for goods and services, the transaction is submitted to and analyzed by us. We either accept or decline the check for warranty coverage under our guarantee service. If we approve the check for warranty coverage and the merchant accepts the check, the merchant will either deposit the check in its bank account or process it for settlement through our Electronic Check Acceptance service. If the check is returned unpaid by the merchant’s bank and the returned check meets the requirements for warranty coverage, we are required to purchase the check from the merchant at its face value. We then own the purchased check and pursue collection of the check from the check writer. As a result, we bear the risk of loss if we are unable to collect the returned check from the check writer. We earn a fee for each check we guarantee, which generally is determined as a percentage of the check amount.
Electronic Check Acceptance service converts a paper check written at the POS into an electronic item and enables funds to be deposited electronically to the merchant’s account and deducted electronically from the check writer’s account.
Under the verification service, when a merchant receives a check in payment for goods or services, the transaction is submitted to and analyzed by us. We will either recommend the merchant accept or decline the check. If the merchant accepts the check, the merchant will deposit the check in its bank account. If the check is returned unpaid by the merchant’s bank, we are not required to purchase the check from the merchant and the merchant bears all risk of loss on the check. We earn a fee for each check submitted for verification, which is generally a fixed amount per check.
Merchant Solutions segment competition Our Merchant Solutions business competes with several third-party processors and financial institutions that provide these services to their merchant customers in the U.S. In many cases, our merchant alliances also compete against each other for the same business. The check guarantee and verification products compete principally with the products of one other national competitor as well as the migration to other non-check products.
The most significantprimary competitive factors relate to price, brand, strength of financial institution partnership,impacting NSS are system performance and reliability, data security, breadth of features and functionality, platform scalability and servicing capability. The Merchantflexibility, price, and financial institution consolidation. Other factors impacting NSS include increasingly powerful and affordable technology capacity, improved data management and analytic tools, and emergence of cloud-based delivery models.

Network & Security Solutions segment is further impacted by large merchant and large bank consolidation, card network business model expansion,Seasonality NSS experiences a modest level of seasonality, with the first quarter representing the lowest level of sales and the creationfourth quarter representing the highest level of new payment methodssales. Over the past eight quarters, NSS' quarterly revenue as a percentage of total yearly revenue has ranged between 23% and devices.26%.

Network & Security Solutions Geographic Mix and Revenues NSS is comprised of more than 95% domestic businesses.

Network & Security Solutions Acquisitions and Dispositions On October 2, 2017, we formed a digital banking joint venture, named Apiture, combining FDC and Live Oak Bancshares, Inc.'s digital banking platforms, products, and services, delivering innovative technology solutions tailored for financial institutions. Apiture is owned and managed equally between us and Live Oak Bancshares, Inc, as a result, the contributed digital banking business will no longer be consolidated into the our results.

In 2015, we acquired Transaction Wireless, Inc. (TWI) a provider of digital stored value products that offer gift card programs, loyalty incentives, and integrated marketing solutions for retailers, partners, and consumers.

See note 12 "Acquisitions and Dispositions" to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for more details relating to this acquisition and disposition.






712





In the Merchant Solutions segment, the card payment networks—VISA, MasterCard, and issuers/networks—American Express and Discover—are increasingly offering products and services that compete with our suite of solutions.
Merchant Solutions seasonality Merchant Solutions’ revenues and earnings are impacted by the volume of consumer usage of credit cards, debit cards, stored value cards, and checks written at the POS. Merchant Solutions generally experiences increased POS activity during the traditional holiday shopping period in the fourth quarter, the back-to-school buying period in the third quarter, and significant holidays.
Merchant Solutions geographic mix and revenues Revenues from external customers for the Merchant Solutions segment are substantially all earned in the U.S. Merchant revenues outside of the U.S. are generally managed and reported by our International segment. Within the U.S., revenues from external customers are spread across the country because Merchant Solutions has merchant customers and alliance partners across geographic regions and a large percentage of its transactions occur at national merchants.

Merchant Solutions acquisitions We have recently made the following acquisitions and product developments.

CloverTM In 2012, we acquired Clover Network, Inc. (Clover), a provider of payment network services. In 2013 we unveiled Clover Station—a reliable and easy to use POS and business management solution for merchants. With security and reliability coupled with the flexibility of cloud-based storage, Clover Station is a comprehensive solution with respect to meeting SMB owners’ needs.

PerkaTM In 2013, we acquired Perka, Inc. (Perka), a mobile marketing and consumer loyalty platform that helps small to medium-sized merchants engage their customers with location-based smartphone applications. Perka is an easy-to-use alternative to paper-punch cards. Business owners can deliver custom messages and special offers directly to customers’ phones that encourage repeat visits and additional sales.

GyftTM In 2014, we acquired Gyft, Inc. (Gyft), the leading digital platform that enables consumers to buy, send, manage, and redeem gift cards using mobile devices. Gyft’s exceptional capabilities, combined with our long-standing leadership in prepaid solutions, create a distinct combination in a rapidly growing market for virtual gift cards.

Financial Services segment

The Financial Services segment is comprised of:
(1)credit and retail card processing services;
(2)
debit network and processing services;
(3)output services; and
(4)other services including remittance processing.

The following table presents Financial Services information as a percentage of total segment and All Other and Corporate:
 Year ended December 31,
 2014
2013
2012
Segment revenues from external customers20% 20% 20%
Segment EBITDA28% 25% 25%
Assets (as of December 31)12% 12% 12%
Description of Financial Services segment operations Financial Services provides issuer card and network solutions for credit, retail, and debit card processing, debit network services (including the STAR network), output services to financial institutions and other organizations offering credit, debit, and retail cards to consumers and businesses to manage customer cards. Financial Services also provides PIN debit network services through the STAR Network which enables PIN-secured debit transaction acceptance at over 2 million automated teller machine (ATM) and retail device locations in the U.S. as of December 31, 2014. Financial Services also offers payment management solutions for recurring bill payment and services to improve customer communications, billing, online banking, and consumer bill payment. Revenue and profit growth comes primarily from an

8





increase in debit and credit card usage, growth from existing clients and sales to new clients, and the related account conversions.
The Financial Services segment had more than 3,500 domestic client relationships. We have relationships and many long-term customer contracts with card issuers providing credit and retail card processing, output services for printing and embossing items, debit card processing services, and STAR Network services. These contracts generally require a notice period before the end of the contract if a client chooses not to renew. Additionally, some contracts may allow for early termination upon the occurrence of certain events such as a change in control. The termination fees paid upon the occurrence of such events are designed primarily to cover balance sheet exposure related to items such as capitalized conversion costs or signing bonuses associated with the contract and, in some cases, may cover a portion of lost future revenue and profit. Although these contracts may be terminated upon certain occurrences, the contracts provide the segment with a steady revenue stream since a vast majority of the contracts are honored through the contracted expiration date.
Credit and retail card issuing and processing services Credit and retail card issuing and processing services provide outsourcing services to financial institutions and other issuers of cards, such as consumer finance companies and retailers. Financial Services clients include a wide variety of banks, savings and loan associations, group service providers, retailers, and credit unions. Services provided include, among other things, account maintenance, transaction authorizing and posting, fraud, and risk management services and settlement.
We provide services throughout the period of each card's use, starting from a card issuing client processing an application for a card. Services may include processing the card application, initiating service for the cardholder, processing each card transaction for the issuing retailer or financial institution, and accumulating the card's transactions into monthly billing statement, and posting cardholder payments. Our fraud management services monitor the unauthorized use of cards that have been reported to be lost, stolen, or which exceed credit limits. Our fraud detection systems help identify fraudulent transactions by monitoring cardholders' purchasing patterns and flagging unusual purchases. Other services provided include customized communications to cardholders, information verification associated with granting credit, debt collection, and customer service.
Revenues for credit and retail card issuing and processing services are derived from fees payable under contracts that depend primarily on the number of cardholder accounts on file. More revenue is derived from active accounts (those accounts on file that had a balance or any monetary posting or authorization activity during the period) than inactive accounts.
Debit network and processing services We provide STAR Network access, PIN-debit and signature debit card processing services, and ATM processing services, such as transaction routing, authorization, and settlement as well as ATM management and monitoring. The STAR Network represents a debit network that is connected to thousands of financial institutions, merchants, payment processors, ATM processors, and card processors that participate in the network. When a merchant acquirer or ATM owner acquires a STAR Network transaction, it sends the transaction to the network switch, which is operated by us, which in turn routes the transaction to the appropriate participating financial institution for authorization. To be routed through the STAR Network, a transaction must be initiated with a card participating in the STAR Network at an ATM or POS device also participating in the STAR Network. STAR Network’s fees differ from those presented in the example above in the Merchant Solutions segment description. Fees for PIN-debit transactions are generally lower than those conducted through other customer authentication methods due to the lower amount of risk in the transaction.
Revenues related to the STAR Network and debit card and ATM processing services are derived from fees payable under contracts but are driven more by monetary transactions processed than by accounts on file. We provide services that are driven by client transactions and are separately priced and negotiated with clients. In a situation in which a PIN-secured debit transaction uses our debit network and we are the debit card processor for the financial institution as well as the processor for the merchant, we receive: (1) a fee from the card issuing financial institution for running the transaction through the STAR Network, recognized in the Financial Services segment; (2) a fee from the card issuer for obtaining the authorization, recognized in the Financial Services segment; (3) a fee from the merchant for acquiring the transaction, which is recognized in the Merchant Solutions segment; and (4) a network acquirer fee from the merchant for accessing the STAR Network, which is recognized in the Financial Services segment. There are other possible configurations of transactions that result in us receiving multiple fees for a transaction, depending on the role we play.
Output services Output services consist of statement and letter printing, card embossing, chip card personalization, and mailing services. Services are provided to clients that process accounts on our platform as described above and for clients that process accounts on alternative platforms. We provide these services primarily through in-house facilities. Revenues for output services are derived primarily on a per piece basis and consist of fees for the production and materials related to finished products. The mailing services drive a majority of our postage revenue.

9





Other services Other services consist of our remittance processing, online banking and bill payment services, and Interactive Voice Response (IVR) services. The remittance processing business processes mail-in payments for third-party organizations. Revenues for remittance processing services are derived primarily on a per transaction basis and consist of fees for processing consumer and business payments. Other services consist primarily of online banking and bill payment services and voice services.
Financial Services segment competition Our Financial Services segment competes with several other third-party card processors and debit networks in the U.S., as well as financial institutions with in-house operations to manage card issuance and maintenance. We also face significant competition from regional and national operators of debit networks.
The most significant competitive factors are price, system performance and reliability, breadth of features and functionality, disaster recovery capabilities and business continuity preparedness, data security, scalability, and flexibility of infrastructure and servicing capability. The Financial Services business is impacted by financial institution consolidation.
In the Financial Services segment, the payment networks—VISA, MasterCard, and issuers/networks-American Express and Discover—are increasingly offering products and services that compete with our products and services.
Financial Services seasonality Financial Services revenues and earnings are impacted by the volume of consumer usage of credit, retail, and debit cards. Such volumes are generally impacted by increased activity during the traditional holiday shopping period in the fourth quarter, the back-to-school buying period in the third quarter, and significant holidays.
Financial Services geographic mix and revenues Revenues from external customers for the Financial Services segment are substantially all earned in the U.S. Card issuing revenues outside of the U.S. are reported by our International segment. Within the U.S., revenues from external customers are geographically dispersed throughout the country.
International segment

The International segment is comprised of:
credit, retail, debit, and prepaid card processing;
merchant acquiring and processing; and
ATM and POS processing, acquiring, and switching services.

The following table presents International information as a percentage of total segment and All Other and Corporate:
 Year ended December 31,
 2014
2013
2012
Segment revenues from external customers26% 25% 25%
Segment EBITDA20% 19% 20%
Assets (as of December 31)14% 15% 14%
International has operations in 33 countries. The International acquiring services facilitate the merchants’ ability to accept credit, debit, and stored-value cards. The segment’s merchant processing and acquiring services include authorization, transaction capture, settlement, chargeback handling, and Internet based transaction processing and are the largest component of the segment’s revenue.

The International issuing services provide issuer card, output services, ATM services, and professional services. Issuer card and network solutions includes credit, retail, and debit card processing for financial institutions and other organizations offering credit cards, debit cards and retail private label cards to consumers and businesses to manage customer accounts. Output services include statement and letter printing, embossing and mailing services, and call center services. ATM services include processing, acquiring, and switching services. Additionally, the International issuing services provide licensing for card processing software, and professional services.

The International segment revenue drivers are similar to the Merchant Solutions and Financial Services segments described above. The International acquiring services revenues are driven most significantly by the number of transactions, dollar volumes of those transactions and trends in consumer spending. The International issuing services revenues for issuer card and network solutions are driven primarily by accounts on file, with active accounts having a larger impact on revenue than inactive

10





accounts. Additionally, the International segment revenue is impacted by foreign exchange rate movements as well as the macroeconomic forces within countries where the services are being sold.
International segment competition and seasonality Competition and seasonality within the International segment are similar to that of the Merchant Solutions and Financial Services segments for the respective product and service offerings. A noted difference from the U.S. operations is that generally there are a greater number of competitors, and smaller ones in particular, due to the International segment’s global span.
International geographic mix The following countries accounted for more than 10% of the segment’s revenues from external customers for the periods presented:
 Year ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
United Kingdom20% 17% 17%
Australia10% 12% 15%
Germany12% 12% 12%
No individual international country was material to our consolidated revenues.
All Other and Corporate

The remainder of our business units are grouped in the All Other and Corporate category, which includes Integrated Payment Systems (IPS), First Data Government Solutions (FDGS), and smaller businesses as well as corporate operations.
IPS primarily engages in money transmission services. Historically, the principal IPS business was official check services. Until May 2010, IPS issued official checks, which were sold by agents that were financial institutions. Official checks served as an alternative to a bank’s own items such as cashiers or bank checks. We have exited the official check line of business, yet continue to support these outstanding payment instruments until they are presented for payment, or are escheated to local governments. The majority of the clients of this business deconverted during 2008 and there was no new official check and money order business beyond May 2010. IPS will continue to use its licenses to offer payment services that fall under state and federal regulations.
FDGS operates payment systems and related technologies in the government sector. For instance, FDGS provides electronic tax payment processing services for the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System.
Corporate operations include administrative and shared servicecorporate-wide governance functions such as theour executive group, legal,management team, tax, treasury, internal audit, finance,corporate strategy, and certain accounting, human resources information technology, and procurement.legal costs related to supporting the corporate function. Costs incurred by Corporate that are directly relatedattributable to a segment are allocated to the respective segment. Administrative

Global Regions

We currently have operations in 34 countries and shared service costs are retained by Corporate.serve businesses and financial institutions in over 100 countries around the world as illustrated on the following map:
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
All OtherWe deliver our solutions throughout the world via four regions:
North America

North America (United States and Corporate competition Canada) is our largest region. We are the largest merchant acquirer, issuer processor, and third largest U.S. debit network. The operations within All OtherUnited States is our largest market and Corporate have various competitors. No single competitor would have a material impact on our operations.
All Other and Corporate significant customers During 2014, we had a significant relationship with one client whose revenues represented approximately 50% of All Other and Corporate revenueaccounts for the year ended December 31, 2014.majority of our activity in the region. In 2017, we processed approximately 77 billion commercial transactions and processed $2.1 trillion of payment volume in the United States, representing over 10% of U.S. GDP.

Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA)

We have operations in 17 countries and serve clients in 66 countries in this region. We are a leading acquirer processor in EMEA and provide our suite of next-generation commerce-enabling solutions to businesses and financial institutions of all sizes and types.

Latin America (LATAM)

We have operations in 7 countries and serve clients in 32 countries in this region. We are a leading merchant acquirer, issuer processor, and eCommerce processor to businesses and financial institutions of all sizes and types in the region.

13






Asia Pacific (APAC)

We have operations in 8 countries and serve clients in 17 countries in this region. We are a leading merchant acquirer, issuer processor, and eCommerce processor to businesses and financial institutions of all sizes and types in the region and have begun to introduce other commerce-enabling solutions in selected markets.

Intellectual Property

We own a global portfolio of many trademarks, trade names, patents, and other intellectual property that are important to our future success. The only intellectual property rights that are individually material to us are the FIRST DATAFirst Data trademark and trade name, and the STAR trademark and trade name. The STAR trademark and trade name are used in the Financial Services segment. The FIRST DATAFirst Data trademark and trade name are associated with quality and reliable electronic commerce and payments solutions. The STAR trademark and trade name are used in NSS. Financial institutions and merchants associate the STAR trademark and trade name with quality and reliable debit network services and processing services. Loss of the proprietary use of the FIRST DATAFirst Data or STAR trademarks and trade names or a diminution in the perceived quality associated with these names could harm the growth of our businesses.


11





Employees and Labor

As of December 31, 2014,2017, we employedhad approximately 23,000 persons, approximately 97% of which were full-time22,000 employees. The majority of the employees of our subsidiaries outside of the U.S.United States are subject to the terms of individual employment agreements. One of our wholly owned subsidiaries has approximately 1,6001,900 employees in the United Kingdom, a portion of whom are members of the Unite trade union. Employees of our subsidiaries in Vienna, Austria; Frankfurt, Germany; and Nürnberg, Germany are also represented by local workswork councils. The Vienna workforce and a portion of the Frankfurt workforce are also covered by a union contract. Certain employees of our Korean subsidiary are represented by a Labor-Management council. In Brazil, every single employee isall employees are unionized and covered by the terms of industry-specific collective agreements. Employees in certain other countries are also covered by the terms of industry-specific national collective agreements. None of our employees are otherwise represented by any labor organization in the U.S.United States. We believe that our relations with our employees and the labor organizations identified above are in good standing.

Available Information

Our principal executive offices are located at 225 Liberty Street, 29th Floor, New York, NY 10281, telephone (800) 735-3362. Our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports are available free of charge to shareholders and other interested parties through the “Investor Relations” portion of our website at http://investor.firstdata.com as soon as reasonably practical after they are filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not incorporated by reference into this document, and you should not consider information on our website to be part of this document. The SEC maintains a website, www.sec.gov, which contains reports and other information filed electronically with the SEC by us. Various corporate governance documents, including our Audit Committee Charter, Governance, Compensation and Nominations Committee Charter, and Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers are available without charge through the “About Us” “Investor Relations” “Corporate Governance” portion of our investor relations website, listed above.

Government Regulations

Various aspects of our service areas are subject to U.S. federal, state, and local regulation, as well as regulation outside the U.S.United States. Failure to comply with regulations may result in the suspension or revocation of licenses or registrations, the limitation, suspension or termination of service, and/or the imposition of civil and criminal penalties, including fines. Certain of our services also are subject to rules promulgated by various payment networks and banking authorities as more fully described below.

The Dodd-Frank Act In July 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act) was signed into law in the U.S.United States. The Dodd-Frank Act has resulted in significant structural and other changes to the regulation of the financial services industry. Among other things, Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act established a new, independent regulatory agency known as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to regulate consumer financial products and services (including some offered by our customers)clients). The CFPB may also have authority over us as a provider of services to regulated financial institutions in connection with consumer financial products. Recently the CFPB released rules amending federal Regulation E and Regulation Z. The rules clarify the regulatory prepaid landscape for consumer access to disclosures, fees and statements, error resolution, limited liability and overdrafts. The rules have an impact to our subsidiary Money Network Financial LLC (Money Network) for disclosure, fees and error resolution processing. Separately, under the Dodd-Frank Act, debit interchange transaction fees that a card issuer receives and that are established by a payment card network for an electronic debit transaction are

14





now regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Board (Board)System (Federal Reserve Board), and must be “reasonable and proportional” to the cost incurred by the card issuer in authorizing, clearing, and settling the transaction. Effective October 1, 2011, the Federal Reserve Board capped debit interchange rates for card issuers operating in the U.S.United States with assets of $10 billion or more at the sum of $0.21 per transaction and an ad valorem component of 5 basis points to reflect a portion of the issuer’s fraud losses plus, for qualifying issuers, an additional $0.01 per transaction in debit interchange for fraud prevention costs.more. In addition, the new regulations contain non-exclusivity provisions that ban debit payment card networks from prohibiting an issuer from contracting with any other payment card network that may process an electronic debit transaction involving an issuer’s debit cards and prohibit card issuers and payment networks from inhibiting the ability of merchants to direct the routing of debit card transactions over any network that can process the transaction. Beginning April 1, 2012, all debit card issuers in the U.S.United States were required to participate in at least two unaffiliated debit payment card networks. On April 1, 2013, the ban on network exclusivity arrangements became effective for prepaid card and healthcare debit card issuers, with some leewaycertain exceptions for prepaid cards issued before that date.

Effective July 22, 2010, merchants were allowed to set minimum dollar amounts (not to exceed $10) for the acceptance of a credit card (while federal governmental entities and institutions of higher education may set maximum amounts for the acceptance of credit cards). They were also allowed to provide discounts or incentives to entice consumers to pay with an alternative payment method, such as cash, checks or debit cards. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act created a new entity, the Financial Stability Oversight Council, and authorizesauthorized it to require that a nonbank financial company that is deemed to pose a systemic risk to the U.S. financial system become subject to consolidated, prudential supervision by the Federal Reserve Board. At this point it is unclear whether we would be subject to additional systemic risk related oversight.

12





Association and network rulesNetwork Rules We are subject to rules of MasterCard, Visa, INTERAC, PULSE, and other payment networks. In order to provide processing services, a number of our subsidiaries are registered with Visa and/or MasterCard as service providers for member institutions. A number of subsidiaries outside the U.S. are direct members or associate members of Visa and MasterCard for purposes of conducting merchant acquiring. Various subsidiaries of ours are also processor level members of numerous debit and electronic benefits transaction (EBT) networks or are otherwise subject to various network rules in connection with processing services and other services we provide. As such, we are subject to applicable card association, network, and national scheme rules that could subject us to fines or penalties. We are also subject to network operating rules promulgated by the National Automated Clearing House Association (NACHA) relating to payment transactions processed by us using the Automated Clearing House (ACH) Network and to various state and Federalfederal laws regarding such operations, including laws pertaining to EBT.electronic benefits transaction.
Cashcard Australia Limited (Cashcard) is a member of the Australian Consumer Electronic Clearing System (CECS), which is a debit payment system regulated by network operating rules established and administered by Australian Payments Clearing Association Limited, and is a member of the ATM Access Australia Limited and the eftpos® Access Australia Limited that respectively administers reciprocal access and interchange arrangements for ATMs and Electronic Funds Transfer at Point of Sale (eftpos®) in Australia. The network operating rules, ATM Access Code and eftpos® Access Code impose a variety of sanctions, including suspension or termination of membership and fines for non-compliance. Cashcard also operates its own network of members, regulated by rules promulgated by Cashcard. To enable Cashcard to settle in CECS direct with banks and financial institutions, Cashcard maintains an Exchange Settlement Account (ESA) which is supervised by the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA), and that requires Cashcard to adhere to conditions imposed by RBA.

Our subsidiary in Germany, TeleCash GmbH & Co. KG, is certified and regulated as a processor for domestic German debit card transactions by the Deutsche Kreditwirtschaft (DK), the German banking association.Banking Industry Committee. Failure to comply with the technical requirements set forth by the DK may result in suspension or termination of services.

Banking regulationRegulations Because a number of our subsidiary businesses provide data processing services for financial institutions, we are subject to examination by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC). The FFIEC, which examines large data processors in order to identify and mitigate risks associated with significant service providers.

FDR Limited (FDRL)is authorized and regulated in the United Kingdom is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, (FCA),one of the regulatory authority for the full range oftwo principal financial servicesmarkets regulators in the United Kingdom. FDRLFDR Limited is authorized by the FCAFinancial Conduct Authority to carryarrange and advise on ancertain insurance mediation businesscontracts for the purpose of arranging insurance taken out by its issuer clients' cardholders. FDR Limited also has obtained permission from the Financial Conduct Authority in respect of certain consumer credit activities related to its issuer customers’ cardholdersservices and merchant terminal leasing businesses. As a firm authorized by the Financial Conduct Authority, FDR Limited is required to meetcomply with certain prudential, and conduct of business and reporting requirements.

As a result of the implementation of the Payment Services Directive 2007/60 EC(2007/64/EC) in the European Union (PSD), a number of our subsidiaries in the International segmentGBS hold Payment Institution Licensespayment institution licenses in the countries whereEuropean Union member states in which such subsidiaries do business. As Payment Institutions,payment institutions, we are subject to regulation and oversight in the applicable European Union member state, which includes amongst(amongst other things, theobligations) a requirement to maintain specified regulatory capital. The PSD was amended by a revised Payment Services Directive, known as PSD2 which was required to be transposed into national law by January 2018. Under PSD2, each subsidiary holding a payment institution license will need to submit by April 2018 a reauthorization application to the applicable regulatory authority and be approved to continue providing the licensed business activity.

First Data Trust Company, LLC (FDTC) engages in trust activities previously conducted by the trust department of a former banking subsidiary of ours and is subject to regulation, examination, and oversight by the Division of Banking of the Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies. Since FDTC is not a “bank” under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (BHCA), our affiliation with FDTC does not cause us to be regulated as a bank holding company or financial holding company under the BHCA.

TeleCheck Payment Systems Limited (TPSL) in Australia holds an Australian Financial Services License under Chapter 7 of the Australian Corporations Act 2001, which regulates the provision of a broad range of financial services in Australia. The license, issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, entitles the Australian operations of TPSL to deal in and provide general financial product advice about its check guarantee and check verification product and requires that TPSL’s Australian operations issue product documents that comply with specific content requirements and follow prescribed procedures.
15





Further, in our International segment, several subsidiaries provide services such as factoring or settlement that make them subject to regulation by local banking agencies, including the National Bank of Slovakia, the National Bank of Poland, the Reserve Bank of Australia, and the German Federal Financial Supervision Agency.

Privacy and information security regulationsInformation Security Regulations We provide services that may be subject to various state, federal, and foreign privacy laws and regulations, including, among others, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, Directive 95/46/EC, the Australian Privacy Act, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act in Canada, the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance in Hong Kong, the Malaysian Data Protection Act 2010, and the Singapore Data Protection Act 2012. These laws and their

13





implementing regulations restrictgovern certain collection, processing, storage, use, and disclosure of personal information, can require notice to entities or individuals of privacy practices,incidents, and provide individuals with certain rights relating to preventthe use and disclosure of protected information. These laws also impose requirements for the safeguarding and proper destruction of personal information through the issuance of data security standards or guidelines. Certain federal and state laws impose similar privacy obligations and, in certain circumstances, obligations to notify affected individuals, state officers, the media, and consumer reporting agencies, as well as businesses and governmental agencies that own the information, of security breaches affecting personal information. In addition, there are state laws restricting the ability to collect and utilize certain types of information such as Social Security and driver’s license numbers. In February 2013, the European Commission proposed additional European Union-wide legislation regarding cyber security in the form of the proposed Network and Information Security Directive (NIS Directive). The NIS Directive is currently being considered by the two other main European Union legislative institutions, the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament. On June 29, 2015, the Council of the European Union announced that agreement had been reached in informal negotiations on the main principles of the NIS Directive. Similarly, the General Data Protection Regulation is slated to take effect throughout the European Union on May 25, 2018 and creates a range of new compliance obligations and increases financial penalties for non-compliance and extends the scope of the European Union data protection law to all companies processing data of European Union residents, regardless of the company’s location.

Credit reportingReporting and debt collections regulationsDebt Collections RegulationsTeleCheck TeleCheck is subject to the Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act and various similar state laws based on TeleCheck’s maintenance of a database containing the check-writing histories of consumers and the use of that information in connection with its check verification and guarantee services.

The collection business within TRS Recovery Services, Inc. (TRS) is subject to the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and various similar state laws. TRS has licenses in a number of states in order to engage in collection in those states. In the United Kingdom, FDRLFDR Limited has a license under the Consumer Credit Act of 1974 (CCA) to enable it to undertake, among other things, credit administration and debt collections activities on behalf of its card issuing customersclients through calls and correspondence with the cardholders. FDRLFDR Limited is also licensed under the CCA to carry on the activity of a consumer hire business for the purpose of leasing point of sale devices to merchants.

TeleCheck and TRS are subject to regulation, supervision, and examination from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.CFPB. Further regulations may be imposed in the future as state governments and federal agencies identify and consider supplementary consumer financial protection, including laws regulating activities with respect to current or emerging technology such as automated dialers or pre-recorded messaging or calls to cellular phones, which could impair the collection by TRS of returned checks and those purchased under TeleCheck’s guarantee services. Moreover, reducing or eliminating access to and use of information on drivers licenses, requiring blocking of access to credit reports or scores, mandating score or scoring methodology disclosure and proscribing the maintenance or use of consumer databases could reduce the effectiveness of TeleCheck’s risk management tools or otherwise increase its costs of doing business.

In addition, several subsidiaries inof our International segmentsubsidiaries are subject to comparable local laws regarding collection activities and obtaining credit reports.

Anti-money launderingUnfair Trade Practice Regulations We and counter terrorist regulationour clients are subject to various federal, state, and international laws prohibiting unfair or deceptive trade practices, such as Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. Various regulatory enforcement agencies, including the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and state attorneys general, have authority to take action against parties that engage in unfair or deceptive trade practices or violate other laws, rules, and regulations and to the extent we are processing payments for a client that may be in violation of laws, rules, and regulations, we may be subject to enforcement actions and incur losses and liabilities that may impact our business. For example, TeleCheck and TRS are subject to a consent decree with the FTC which, among other items, addresses the timeliness of certain actions that they take.

Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Bribery, Sanctions, and Counter-Terrorist Regulations We are subject to anti-money laundering laws and regulations, including the Bank Secrecy Act, as amended by the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 (collectively, BSA). The BSA, amongAmong other things, the BSA requires money services businesses (such as money transmitters, issuers of money orders and official checks, and providers of prepaid access) to develop and implement risk-based anti-money laundering programs, report

16





large cash transactions and suspicious activity, and to maintain transaction records. Our subsidiary Money Network Financial LLC is a provider ofprovides prepaid access for various open loop prepaid programs for which it is the program manager and therefore must meet the requirements of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), the agency that enforces the BSA. Recently FinCEN released rules requiring the collection and verification of beneficial owners holding equal to or greater than 25% equity interest. We will be required to comply with the new rules, which have a mandatory compliance date of May 2018.

We are also subject to anti-corruption laws and regulations, including the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and other laws, that prohibit the making or offering of improper payments to foreign government officials and political figures and includes anti-bribery provisions enforced by the Department of Justice and accounting provisions enforced by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The FCPA has a broad reach and requires maintenance of appropriate records and adequate internal controls to prevent and detect possible FCPA violations. Many other jurisdictions where we conduct business also have similar anticorruption laws and regulations. We have policies, procedures, systems, and controls designed to identify and address potentially impermissible transactions under such laws and regulations.

We are also subject to certain economic and trade sanctions programs that are administered by the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), which prohibit or restrict transactions to or from or dealings with specified countries, their governments, and in certain circumstances, their nationals, and with individuals and entities that are specially-designated nationals of those countries, narcotics traffickers, and terrorists or terrorist organizations. Other group entities may be subject to additional local sanctions requirements in other relevant jurisdictions.

Similar anti-money laundering and counter terrorist financing and proceeds of crime laws apply to movements of currency and payments through electronic transactions and to dealings with persons specified in lists maintained by the country equivalents to the OFAC lists in several other countries and require specific data retention obligations to be observed by intermediaries in the payment process. Our businesses in those jurisdictions are subject to those data retention obligations. In the European Union, for example, certain of our businesses are subject to requirements under the Third Money Laundering Directive (2005/60/EC) (MLD3) as implemented in relevant European Union member states. MLD3 was repealed and replaced by the Fourth Money Laundering Directive ((EU) 2015/849) (MLD4), when the latter entered into force on June 25, 2015. European Union member states were required to implement MLD4 into national law by June 26, 2017.

Money transmissionTransmission and payment instrument licensingPayment Instrument Licensing and regulationRegulations We are subject to various U.S. federal, state, and foreign laws and regulations governing money transmission and the issuance and sale of payment instruments, including some of our prepaid products.

In the U.S.,United States, most states license money transmitters and issuers of payment instruments. Many states exercise authority over the operations of our services related to money transmission and payment instruments and, as part of this authority, subject us to periodic examinations. Many states require, among other things, that proceeds from money transmission activity and payment instrument sales be invested in high-quality marketable securities before the settlement of the transactions. Such licensing laws also may cover matters such as regulatory approval of consumer forms, consumer disclosures and the filing of periodic reports

14





by the licensee, and require the licensee to demonstrate and maintain levels of net worth. Many states also require money transmitters, issuers of payment instruments, and their agents to comply with federal and/or state anti-money laundering laws and regulations.

Escheat regulationsEscheatment Regulations We are subject to unclaimed or abandoned property (escheat) laws both in the U.S.United States and abroad that require us to turn over to certain government authorities the property of others held by us that has been unclaimed for a specified period of time such as, in the Integrated Payment Systems (IPS) business, payment instruments that have not been presented for payment or, in the Merchant Solutions segment,GBS, account balances that cannot be returned to a merchant following discontinuation of its relationship with us. A number of our subsidiaries hold property subject to escheat laws and we have an ongoing program to comply with those laws. We are subject to audit by individual U.S. states with regard to our escheatment practices.

Telephone Consumer Protection Act  We are subject to the Federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act and various state laws to the extent we place telephone calls and short message service (SMS) messages to clients and consumers. The Telephone Consumer Protection Act regulates certain telephone calls and SMS messages placed using automatic telephone dialing systems or artificial or prerecorded voices. A number of our international subsidiaries are subject to equivalent laws in their jurisdictions.

Indirect Regulatory Requirements A number of our clients are financial institutions that are directly subject to various regulations and compliance obligations issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,CFPB, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and other agencies responsible for regulating financial institutions. While these regulatory requirements and compliance obligations do not apply directly to us, many of these requirements materially affect the services we provide to our clients and us overall. To remain competitive, we expend significant resources to assist our clients in meeting their various compliance obligations, including the cost of updating our systems and services as necessary to allow our clients to comply with applicable laws and regulations, and the cost of dedicating sufficient

17





resources to assist our clients in meeting their new and enhanced oversight and audit requirements established by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,CFPB, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and others. The banking agencies, including the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, also have imposed requirements on regulated financial institutions to manage their third-party service providers. Among other things, these requirements include performing appropriate due diligence when selecting third-party service providers; evaluating the risk management, information security, and information management systems of third-party service providers; imposing contractual protections in agreements with third-party service providers (such as performance measures, audit and remediation rights, indemnification, compliance requirements, confidentiality and information security obligations, insurance requirements, and limits on liability); and conducting ongoing monitoring of the performance of third-party service providers. Accommodating these requirements applicable to our clients imposes additional costs and risks in connection with our financial institution relationships. We expect to expend significant resources on an ongoing basis in an effort to assist our clients in meeting their legal requirements.

Other Stored-value services we offer to issuers in the U.S.United States and internationally are subject to various federal, state, and foreign laws and regulations, which may include laws and regulations related to consumer and data protection, licensing, escheat, anti-money laundering, banking, trade practices and competition, and wage and employment. These laws and regulations are evolving, unclear, and sometimes inconsistent and subject to judicial and regulatory challenge and interpretation, and therefore the extent to which these laws and rules have application to, and their impact on, us, financial institutions, merchants or others is in flux. At this time we are unable to determine the impact that the clarification of these laws and their future interpretations, as well as new laws, may have on us, financial institutions, merchants or others in a number of jurisdictions. These services may also be subject to the rules and regulations of the various international, domestic and regional schemes, networks, and associations in which we and the card issuers participate.

In addition, the Housing Assistance Tax Act of 2008 included an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code that requires information returns to be made for each calendar year by merchant acquiring entities and third-party settlement organizations with respect to payments made in settlement of payment card transactions and third-party payment network transactions occurring in that calendar year. Reportable transactions are also subject to backup withholding requirements. We could be liable for penalties if we are not in compliance with these regulations.rules.

In December 2017, the United States enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. The new tax laws decrease the maximum corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% and more favorable tax treatment of earnings outside the U.S. that are repatriated to the U.S. The tax law also limits the amount of interest that may be deducted to determine taxable income to 30% of EBITDA until 2022 and 30% of EBIT after 2022. We expect the net result of the new tax law to be favorable as the benefit we receive from the reduction in the corporate tax rate is greater than the negative impact of the interest deductibility limit. We also expect that over time the amount of interest that is not deductible will decrease due to our efforts to reduce debt as well as increases in EBITDA and EBIT.


1518





ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS
 
The following are certain risks that could affect our business and our results of operations. The risks identified below are not all encompassing but should be considered in establishing an opinion of our future operations.

Business and Operational Risks

Our ability to anticipate and respond to changing industry and customer needs or trends may affect our competitiveness or demand for our products, which may adversely affect our operating results.

Changes in technology may limit the competitiveness of and demand for our services. Our businesses operate in industries that are subject to technological advancements, new competitors, developing industry standards, and changing customer needs and preferences. Also, our customers continue to adopt new technology for business and personal uses. We must anticipate and respond to these industry and customer changes in order to remain competitive within our relative markets. For example, our ability to provide innovative point-of-sale technology to our merchant customers could have an impact on our International and Merchant Solutions business. Furthermore, customers' potential negative reaction to our products and services can spread quickly through social media and damage our reputation before we have the opportunity to respond.

Security breaches or attacks of our systems may have a significant effect on our business.

In order to provide our services, we process and store sensitive business information and personal consumer information in order to provide our services. The confidentiality of the customer/consumer information that resides on our systems is critical to the successful operations of our business. We have what we deem to be sufficient security around the system to prevent unauthorized access to the system. However, our position in the global payments industry may attract hackers to conduct attacks on our systems that could compromise the security of our data. In addition, the increasing sophistication level of cyber criminals may increase the risk of a security breach of our systems. A breach of our products or systems processing or storing sensitive business information or personal consumer information could lead to claims against us, reputational damage, loss of customers’ confidence, as well as imposition of fines and damages, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, profitability, and future growth. In addition, as security threats continue to evolve we may be required to invest additional resources to modify the security of our systems, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

We depend, in part, on our merchant relationships and alliances to grow our Merchant Solutions business. If we are unable to maintain these relationships and alliances, our business may be adversely affected.

Our alliance structures take on different forms, including consolidated subsidiaries, equity method investments, and revenue sharing arrangements. Under the alliance program, a bank or other institution form an alliance with us, either contractually or through a separate legal entity. Merchant contracts may be contributed to the alliance by us and/or the bank or institution. The banks and other institutions generally provide card association sponsorship, clearing, and settlement services. These institutions typically act as a merchant referral source when the institution has an existing banking or other relationship. We provide transaction processing and related functions. Both alliance partners may provide management, sales, marketing, and other administrative services. The alliance structure allows us to be the processor for multiple financial institutions, any one of which may be selected by the merchant as their bank partner. We rely on the continuing growth of our merchant relationships, alliances, and other distribution channels. There can be no guarantee that this growth will continue. The loss of merchant relationships or alliance and financial institution partners could negatively impact our business and result in a reduction of our revenue and profit.

The market for our electronic commerce services is evolving and may not continue to develop or grow rapidly enough for us to maintain and increase our profitability.

If the number of electronic commerce transactions does not continue to grow or if consumers or businesses do not continue to adopt our services, it could have a material adverse effect on the profitability of our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We believe future growth in the electronic commerce market will be driven by the cost, ease-of-use, and quality of products and services offered to consumers and businesses. In order to consistently increase and maintain our profitability, consumers and businesses must continue to adopt our services, including our merchant suite, Clover, Perka, and Gyft solutions.


16





The ability to recruit, retain and develop qualified personnel is critical to our success and growth.

All of our businesses function at the intersection of rapidly changing technological, social,Global economic, and regulatory developments that requires a wide ranging set of expertise and intellectual capital. For us to successfully compete and grow, we must retain, recruit, and develop the necessary personnel who can provide the needed expertise across the entire spectrum of our intellectual capital needs. In addition, we must develop our personnel to provide succession plans capable of maintaining continuity in the midst of the inevitable unpredictability of human capital. However, the market for qualified personnel is competitive and we may not succeed in recruiting additional personnel or may fail to effectively replace current personnel who depart with qualified or effective successors. Our effort to retain and develop personnel may also result in significant additional expenses, which could adversely affect our profitability. We cannot assure that key personnel, including executive officers, will continue to be employed or that we will be able to attract and retain qualified personnel in the future. Failure to retain or attract key personnel could have a material adverse effect on us.

Global economics, political, and other conditions may adversely affect trends in consumer, business, and government spending, which may adversely impact the demand for our services and our revenue and profitability.

The global electronicFinancial services, payments, industry dependsand technology industries in which we operate depend heavily upon the overall level of consumer, business, and government spending. A sustained deterioration in the general economic conditions (including distress in financial markets, turmoil in specific economies around the world, and additional government intervention), particularly in the United States or Europe, or increases in interest rates in key countries in which we operate may adversely affect our financial performance by reducing the number or average purchase amount of transactions involving payment cards. A reduction in the amount of consumer spending could result in a decrease of our revenue and profits.

Adverse economic trends may accelerate the timing, or increase the impact of, risks to our financial performance. Such trends may include, but are not limited to, the following:

Declining economies, foreign currency fluctuations, and the pace of economic recovery can change consumer spending behaviors, such as cross-border travel patterns, on which a significant portion of our revenues are dependent.
Low levels of consumer and business confidence typically associated with recessionary environments and those markets experiencing relatively high unemployment, may cause decreased spending by cardholders.
Budgetary concerns in the United States and other countries around the world could affect the United States and other specific sovereign credit ratings, impact consumer confidence and spending, and increase the risks of operating in those countries.
Emerging market economies tend to be more volatile than the more established markets we serve in the United States and Europe, and adverse economic trends may be more pronounced in such emerging markets.
Financial institutions may restrict credit lines to cardholders or limit the issuance of new cards to mitigate cardholder defaults.
Uncertainty and volatility in the performance of our clients' businesses may make estimates of our revenues, rebates, incentives, and realization of prepaid assets less predictable.
Our clients may decrease spending for value-added services.
Government intervention, including the effect of laws, regulations, and /or government investments in our clients, may have potential negative effects on our business and our relationships with our clients or otherwise alter their strategic direction away from our products.

A weakening in the economy could also force some retailers to close, resulting in exposure to potential credit losses and transaction declines in transactions, and us earning lessreduced earnings on transactions due also to a potential shift to large discount merchants. Additionally, credit card issuers may reduce credit limits and bebecome more selective with regard to which they issue credit cards.in their card issuance practices. Changes in economic conditions could adversely impact our future revenues and profits and result in a downgrade of our debt ratings, which may lead to termination or modification of certain contracts and make it more difficult for us to obtain new business. Any of these developments could have a material adverse impact on our overall business and results of operations.

Our ability to anticipate and respond to changing industry trends and the needs and preferences of our clients and consumers may affect our competitiveness or demand for our products, which may adversely affect our operating results.

Financial services, payments, and technology industries are subject to rapid technological advancements, new products and services, including mobile payment applications, evolving competitive landscape, developing industry standards, and changing client and consumer needs and preferences. We expect that new services and technologies applicable to the financial services, payments, and technology industries will continue to emerge. These changes in technology may limit the competitiveness of and demand for our services. Also, our clients and their customers continue to adopt new technology for business and personal uses. We must anticipate and respond to these changes in order to remain competitive within our relative markets. For example, our ability to provide innovative point-of-sale technology to our merchant clients could have an impact on our Global Business Solutions business.

Failure to develop value-added services that meet the needs and preferences of our clients could have an adverse effect on our ability to compete effectively in our industry. Furthermore, clients' and their customers' potential negative reaction to our products

19





and services can spread quickly through social media and damage our reputation before we have the opportunity to respond. If we are unable to anticipate or respond to technological changes or evolving industry standards on a timely basis, our ability to remain competitive could be materially adversely affected.

Substantial and increasingly intense competition worldwide in the financial services, payments, and technology industries may materially and adversely affect our overall business and operations.

Financial services, payments, and technology industries are highly competitive and our payment solutions compete against all forms of financial services and payment systems, including cash and checks, and electronic, mobile, and eCommerce payment platforms. If we are unable to differentiate ourselves from our competitors, drive value for our clients and/or effectively align our resources with our goals and objectives, we may not be able to compete effectively. Our competitors may introduce their own value-added or other services or solutions more effectively than we do, which could adversely impact our growth. We also compete against new entrants that have developed alternative payment systems, eCommerce payment systems, and payment systems for mobile devices. Failure to compete effectively against any of these competitive threats could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, the highly competitive nature of our industry could lead to increased pricing pressure which could have a material impact on our overall business and results of operations.

Potential changes in the competitive landscape, including disintermediation from other participants in the payments value chain, could harm our business.

We expect that the competitive landscape will continue to change, including:

Rapid and significant changes in technology, resulting in new and innovative payment methods and programs that could place us at a competitive disadvantage and that could reduce the use of our products.
Competitors, clients, governments, and other industry participants may develop products that compete with or replace our value-added products and services.
Participants in the financial services, payments, and technology industries may merge, create joint ventures, or form other business combinations that may strengthen their existing business services or create new payment services that compete with our services.
New services and technologies that we develop may be impacted by industry-wide solutions and standards related to migration to EMV chip technology, tokenization, or other safety and security technologies.

Failure to compete effectively against any of these competitive threats could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our Global Business Solutions business depends, in part, on our merchant relationships and alliances. If we are subjectunable to maintain these relationships and alliances, our business may be adversely affected.

Our alliance structures take on different forms, including consolidated subsidiaries, equity method investments, and revenue sharing arrangements. Under our alliance program, a bank or other institution forms an alliance with us on an exclusive basis, either contractually or through a separate legal entity. Merchant contracts may be contributed to the alliance by us and/or the bank or institution. The banks and other institutions generally provide card association sponsorship, clearing, and settlement services and typically act as a merchant referral source when the institution has an existing banking or other relationship with such merchant. We provide transaction processing and related functions. Both we and our alliance partners may also provide management, sales, marketing, and other administrative services. The alliance structure allows us to be the processor for multiple financial institutions, any one of which may be selected by the merchant as its bank partner. Our Global Business Solutions business is dependent, in part, on our merchant relationships, alliances, and other distribution channels. We are working with our alliance partners to grow their businesses. There can be no guarantee that our efforts will be successful and that we will achieve growth in our merchant relationships, alliances, and other distribution channels. In addition, our contractual arrangements with our merchants and merchant alliance partners are for fixed terms and may also allow for early termination upon the occurrence of certain events. There can be no assurance that we will be able to renew our contractual arrangements with these merchants or merchant alliance partners on similar terms or at all. The loss of merchant relationships or alliance and financial institution partners could negatively impact our business and result in a reduction of our revenue and profit.

Risk Relating to Brexit

The implementation of the United Kingdom’s decision to exit the European Union (referred to as Brexit) could, among other outcomes, disrupt the free movement of goods, services, and people between the U.K. and the E.U., undermine bilateral cooperation in key policy areas, and significantly disrupt trade between the U.K. and the E.U. The effects of Brexit will depend in part on any agreements the U.K. makes to retain access to E.U. markets. These agreements could potentially disrupt the markets we serve and

20





the tax jurisdictions in which we operate and adversely change tax benefits or liabilities in these or other jurisdictions. In addition, Brexit could lead to legal uncertainty and potentially divergent national laws and regulations as the U.K. determines which E.U. laws to replace or replicate. Given the lack of comparable precedent, it is unclear what financial, trade, and legal implications the withdrawal of the U.K. from the E.U. will have and how such withdrawal will affect us.

In addition, Brexit may create additional uncertainty in currency exchange rate fluctuations that may result in the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies in which we conduct business. We translate revenue denominated in foreign currency into U.S. dollars for our financial statements. During periods of a strengthening dollar, our reported international revenue is reduced because foreign currencies translate into fewer U.S. dollars.

Any of these effects of Brexit, among others, could materially adversely affect our relationships with our existing and future clients and suppliers, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial results, and business opportunities.

Failure to obtain new clients or renew client contracts on favorable terms could adversely affect results of operations and financial condition.

Most of our sales involve long-term contracts, which generally require a notice period prior to their scheduled expiration if a client chooses not to renew. Some of these contracts may also allow for early termination upon the occurrence of certain events such as a change in control. While a vast majority of our contracts remain in effect through their scheduled expiration, we may face pricing pressure in obtaining and retaining our larger clients. Some of our competitors may offer more attractive fees to our current and prospective clients, or other services that we do not offer. Larger clients may be able to seek lower prices from us when they renew a contract, when a contract is extended, or when the client’s business has significant volume changes. They may also reduce services if they decide to move services in-house. Further, our SMB clients may exert pricing pressure due to pricing competition or other economic needs or pressures such clients experience from their customers. On some occasions, this pricing pressure results in lower revenue from a client than we had anticipated based on our previous agreement with that client. This reduction in revenue could result in an adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

For potential clients of our business segments, switching from one vendor of core processing or related software and services (or from an internally-developed system) to a new vendor is a significant undertaking. As a result, potential clients often resist change. We seek to overcome this resistance through strategies such as making investments to enhance the functionality of our software. However, there can be no assurance that our strategies for overcoming potential clients’ reluctance to change vendors will be successful, and this resistance may adversely affect our growth.

Security breaches or attacks on our systems may have a significant effect on our business.

In order to provide our services, we process, store, and transmit sensitive business information and personal consumer information, including, but not limited to, names, bankcard numbers, home or business addresses, social security numbers, driver's license numbers, and bank account numbers. Under the card network rules, various federal, state and international laws, and client contracts, we are responsible for information provided to us by financial institutions, merchants, ISOs, third-party service providers, and others. The confidentiality of such sensitive business information and personal consumer information that resides on our systems is critical to our business. We cannot be certain that the security measures and procedures we have in place to protect this sensitive data will be successful or sufficient to counter all current and emerging technology threats designed to breach our systems in order to gain access to confidential information. The increasing sophistication of cyber criminals and their continuous attempts to breach our system has increased the risk of a security breach of our systems. A breach of our products or systems processing or storing sensitive business information or personal consumer information could lead to claims against us, reputational damage, lost clients and lost revenue, substantial additional costs (including costs of notification of consumers, credit monitoring, card reissuance, contact centers and forensics), loss of our financial institution sponsorship, loss of clients' and their customers’ confidence, as well as imposition of fines and damages, or potential restrictions imposed by card networks on our ability to process transactions, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, profitability, financial condition, and future growth. In addition, as security threats continue to evolve we will be required to invest additional resources to modify the security of our systems. The level of required investment could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

We may experience breakdowns in our processing systems that could damage client relations and expose us to liability.

Our core business depends heavily on the reliability of our processing systems. A system outage could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Not only would we suffer damage to our reputation in the event of a system outage, but we may also be liable to third parties. Many of our contractual agreements with clients require us to pay penalties if our systems do not meet certain operating standards. To successfully operate our business, we must be able to protect our processing and other systems from interruption, including from events that may be beyond our control. Events that

21





could cause system interruptions include, but are not limited to, fire, natural disaster, unauthorized entry, power loss, telecommunications failure, computer viruses, terrorist acts, cyber attacks, and war. Although we have taken steps to protect against data loss and system failures, there is still risk that we may lose critical data or experience system failures. To help protect against these events, we perform the vast majority of disaster recovery operations ourselves, but we also utilize select third parties for certain operations, particularly outside of the United States. To the extent we outsource our disaster recovery, we are at risk of the vendor’s unresponsiveness or other failures in the event of breakdowns in our systems. In addition, our property and business interruption insurance may not be adequate to compensate us for all losses or failures that may occur.

Disruptions at other participants in the global financial system could prevent us from delivering our products and services.

The operations and systems of many participants in the global financial system are interconnected. Many of the transactions that involve our products and services rely on multiple participants in the global financial system to accurately move funds and communicate information to the next participant in the transaction chain. A disruption for any reason at one of the participants in the global financial system could impact our ability to obtain or provide information or cause funds to be moved in a manner to successfully deliver our products and services. Although we work with other participants to avoid any disruptions, there is no assurance that such efforts will be effective. Such a disruption could lead to the inability for us to deliver products and services, reputational damage, lost clients and lost revenue, loss of clients' and their customers' confidence, as well as additional costs, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, profitability, financial condition, and future growth.

We may experience software defects, computer viruses, and development delays, which could damage client relations, our potential profitability and expose us to liability.

Our products are based on sophisticated software and computing systems that often encounter development delays, and the underlying software may contain undetected errors, viruses, or defects. Defects in our software products and errors or delays in our processing of electronic transactions could result in additional development costs, diversion of technical and other resources from our other development efforts, loss of credibility with current or potential clients, harm to our reputation, fines imposed by card networks, or exposure to liability claims. In addition, we rely on technologies supplied to us by third parties that may also contain undetected errors, viruses or defects that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Although we attempt to limit our potential liability for warranty claims through disclaimers in our software documentation and limitation-of-liability provisions in our license and other agreements with our clients, we cannot assure that these measures will be successful in limiting our liability.

Our merchants willmay be unable to satisfy obligations for which we may also be liable.

We are subject to the credit risk of our merchants being unable to satisfy obligations for which we may also be liable. For example, we and our merchantmerchants acquiring alliances along with us are contingently liablemay be subject to contingent liability for transactions originally acquired by us that are disputed by the cardholder and charged back to the merchants. If we or the alliance is unable to collect this amount from the merchant due tobecause of the merchant’s insolvency or other reasons, we or the alliance will bear the loss for the amount of the refund paid to the cardholder. We have an active program to manage our credit risk and often mitigate our risk by obtaining collateral. However, itIt is possible, however, that a default on such obligations by one or more of our merchants could have a material adverse effect on our business. For further information on our merchant credit losses, see note 1 "Summary of Significant Policies" to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Fraud by merchants or others could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We havemay be subject to potential liability for fraudulent electronic payment transactions or credits initiated by merchants or others. Examples of merchant fraud include when a merchant or other party knowingly uses a stolen or counterfeit credit, debit or prepaid card, card number, or other credentials to record a false sales transaction, processes an invalid card, or intentionally fails to deliver the merchandise or services sold in an otherwise valid transaction. Criminals are using increasingly sophisticated methods to engage in illegal activities such as counterfeiting and fraud. It is possible that incidents of fraud could increase in the future. Failure to effectively manage risk and prevent fraud would increase our chargeback liability or other liability. Increases in chargebacks or other liability could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We may experience breakdowns in our processing systems that could damage customer relations and expose us to liability.

Our core business depends heavily on the reliability of our processing systems. A system outage could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Not only would we suffer damage to our reputation in the event of a system outage, but we may also be liable to third parties. Many of our contractual agreements with financial institutions require us to pay penalties if our systems do not meet certain operating standards. To successfully operate our business, we must be able to protect our processing and other systems from interruption, including from events that may be beyond our control. Events that could cause system interruptions include, but are not limited to, fire, natural disaster,

17





unauthorized entry, power loss, telecommunications failure, computer viruses, terrorist acts, and war. Although we have taken steps to protect against data loss and system failures, there is still risk that we may lose critical data or experience system failures. We perform the vast majority of disaster recovery operations ourselves, though we utilize select third parties for some aspects of recovery, particularly internationally. To the extent we outsource our disaster recovery, we are at risk of the vendor’s unresponsiveness in the event of breakdowns in our systems. In addition, our property and business interruption insurance may not be adequate to compensate us for all losses or failures that may occur.

We may experience software defects, computer viruses and development delays, which could damage customer relations, our potential profitability and expose us to liability.

Our products are based on sophisticated software and computing systems that often encounter development delays, and the underlying software may contain undetected errors, viruses or defects. Defects in our software products and errors or delays in our processing of electronic transactions could result in additional development costs, diversion of technical and other resources from our other development efforts, loss of credibility with current or potential customers, harm to our reputation, or exposure to liability claims. In addition, we rely on technologies supplied to us by third parties that may also contain undetected errors, viruses or defects that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Although we attempt to limit our potential liability for warranty claims through disclaimers in our software documentation and limitation-of-liability provisions in our license and customer agreements, we cannot assure that these measures will be successful in limiting our liability.

Future consolidation of client financial institutionsinstitution clients or other client groups may adversely affect our financial condition.

We have experienced the negative impact of the substantial bank industry consolidation in recent years. Bank industry consolidation impactscould affect existing and potential clients in our service areas, primarily in Financial Services and Merchant Solutions.areas. Our alliance strategy could also be negatively impacted as a result ofaffected by consolidations, especially where the banks involved are committed to their internal merchant processing businesses that compete with us. Bank consolidation has led to an increasingly concentrated client base, resulting in a changing

22





client mix for Financial Services as well as increased price compression. Further consolidation in the bank industry or other client base could have a negative impact on us, including a loss of revenue and price compression.

We rely on various financial institutions to provide clearing services in connection with our settlement activities. If we are unable to maintain clearing services with these financial institutions and are unable to find a replacement, our business may be adversely affected.

We rely on various financial institutions to provide clearing services in connection with our settlement activities. If such financial institutions should stop providing clearing services or limit our volumes we must find other financial institutions to provide those services. If we are unable to find a replacement financial institution we may no longer be able to provide processing services to certain clients, which could negatively impact our revenue and earnings.

Because we rely on third-party vendors to provide products and services, we could be adversely impacted if they fail to fulfill their obligations.

Our business is dependent on third-party vendors to provide us with certain products and services. The failure of these vendors to perform their obligations in a timely manner could adversely affect our operations and profitability. In addition, if we are unable to renew our existing contracts with our most significant vendors, we might not be able to replace the related product or service at the same cost, which would negatively impact our profitability.

Changes in card association and debit network fees or products could increase costs or otherwise limit our operations.

From time to time, card associations and debit networks increase the organization and/or processing fees (known as interchange fees) that they charge. It is possible that competitive pressures will result in us absorbing a portion of such increases in the future, which would increase our operating costs, reduce our profit margin, and adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition. In addition, the various card associations and networks prescribe certain capital requirements. Any increase in the capital level required would further limit our use of capital for other purposes.

Our business may be adversely affected by geopolitical and other risks associated with operations outside of the United States and, as we continue to expand internationally, we may incur higher than anticipated costs and may become more susceptible to these risks.

We offer merchant acquiring, processing and issuing services outside of the United States, including in the United Kingdom, Germany, Argentina, Greece, India, and Brazil, where our principal non-U.S. operations are located. Our revenues derived from these and other non-U.S. operations are subject to additional risks, including those resulting from social and geopolitical instability and unfavorable political or diplomatic developments, all of which could negatively impact our financial results.

As we expand internationally and grow our non-U.S. client base, we may face challenges due to the presence of more established competitors and our lack of experience in such non-U.S. markets, and we may also incur higher than anticipated costs. If we are unable to successfully manage expenses relating to the international expansion of our business, our financial position and results of operations could be negatively impacted.

Cost savings initiatives may not produce the savings expected and may negatively impact our other initiatives and efforts to grow our business.

In recent years, we have implemented measures aimed at improving our profitability and maintaining flexibility in our capital resources, including restructuring efforts and the introduction of cost savings initiatives. We expect to continue to take measures to improve our profitability and cash flows from operating activities. However, there can be no assurance that the cost control measures will be successful. In addition, these and any future spending reductions, if any, may negatively impact our other initiatives or our efforts to grow our business, which may negatively impact our future results of operations and increase the burden on existing management, systems, and resources.

The ability to recruit, retain and develop qualified personnel is critical to our success and growth.

All of our businesses function at the intersection of rapidly changing technological, social, economic, and regulatory developments that requires a wide range of expertise and intellectual capital. For us to successfully compete and grow, we must retain, recruit, and develop the necessary personnel who can provide the needed expertise across the entire spectrum of our intellectual capital needs. In addition, we must develop our personnel to provide succession plans capable of maintaining continuity in our business. The market for qualified personnel, however, is competitive and we may not succeed in recruiting additional personnel or may

23





fail to effectively replace current personnel who depart with qualified or effective successors. Our effort to retain and develop personnel may also result in significant additional expenses, which could adversely affect our profitability. We cannot assure that key personnel, including executive officers, will continue to be employed or that we will be able to attract and retain qualified personnel in the future. Failure to retain or attract key personnel could have a material adverse effect on us.

Acquisitions and integrating such acquisitions create certain risks and may affect our operating results.

We have been an active business acquireractively acquired businesses and may continue to be activemake acquisitions of businesses or assets in the future. The acquisition and integration of businesses or assets involves a number of risks. The core risks are in the areas of valuation (negotiating a fair price for the business) and, integration (managing the complex process of integrating the acquired company’s people, products, technology, and other assets to realizeextract the projected value of the acquired company and the synergies projected to be realized in connection with the acquisition), regulation (obtaining necessary regulatory or other government approvals that may be necessary to complete acquisitions), and diligence (identifying undisclosed or unknown liabilities or restrictions that will be assumed in the acquisition).

In addition, international acquisitions outside of the United States often involve additional or increased risks including, for example:

managing geographically separated organizations, systems and facilities;
integrating personnel with diverse business backgrounds and organizational cultures;
complying with foreignnon-U.S. regulatory requirements;
fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
enforcement of intellectual property rights in some foreignnon-U.S. countries;
difficulty entering new foreignnon-U.S. markets due to, among other things, customerconsumer acceptance and business knowledge of these new markets; and
general economic and political conditions.

The process of integrating operations could cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the activities of one or more of our combined businesses and the possible loss of key personnel. The diversion of management’s attention and any delays or difficulties encountered in connection with acquisitions and the integration of the two companies’ operations could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or prospects.


18





We rely on various financial institutions to provide clearing services in connection with our settlement activities. If we are unable to maintain clearing services with these financial institutions and are unable to find a replacement, our business may be adversely affected.

We rely on various financial institutions to provide clearing services in connection with our settlement activities. If such financial institutions should stop providing clearing services we must find other financial institutions to provide those services. If we are unable to find a replacement financial institution we may no longer be able to provide processing services to certain customers, which could negatively impact our revenue and earnings.

Changes in card association and debit network fees or products could increase costs or otherwise limit our operations.

From time to time, card associations and debit networks increase the organization and/or processing fees (known as interchange fees) that they charge. It is possible that competitive pressures will result in us absorbing a portion of such increases in the future, which would increase our operating costs, reduce our profit margin, and adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition. In addition, the rules and regulations of the various card associations and networks prescribe certain capital requirements. Any increase in the capital level required would further limit our use of capital for other purposes.

Our business may be adversely affected by risks associated with foreign operations.

We are subject to risks related to the changes in currency rates as a result of our investments in foreign operations and from revenues generated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Revenue and profit generated by international operations will increase or decrease compared to prior periods as a result of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. From time to time, we utilize foreign currency forward contracts or other derivative instruments to mitigate the cash flow or market value risks associated with foreign currency-denominated transactions. However, these hedge contracts may not eliminate all of the risks related to foreign currency translation. In addition, we may become subject to exchange control regulations that restrict or prohibit the conversion of our other revenue currencies into U.S. dollars. The occurrence of any of these factors could decrease the value of revenues and earnings we derive from our international operations and have a material adverse impact on our business.

Financial Risks

Our substantial leverage could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or our industry, expose us to interest rate risk to the extent of our variable rate debt and prevent us from meeting our debt obligations.

We are highly leveraged. As of December 31, 2014,2017, we had $20.9$19.2 billion of total debt. Our high degree of leverage could have important consequences, including:

increasing our vulnerability to adverse economic, industry or competitive developments;
requiring a substantial portion of cash flow from operations to be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness, therefore reducing our ability to use cash flow to fund our operations, capital expenditures, and future business opportunities;
making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our indebtedness, and any failure to comply with the obligations of our debt instruments, including restrictive covenants and borrowing conditions, could result in an event of default under the indenture governing the notes and the agreements governing such other indebtedness;
restricting us from making strategic acquisitions or causing us to make non-strategic divestitures;
making it more difficult for us to obtain network sponsorship and clearing services from financial institutions or to obtain or retain other business with financial institutions;
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, product development, debt service requirements, acquisitions, and general corporate or other purposes; and
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business or market conditions and placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors who are less highly leveraged and who, therefore, may be able to take advantage of opportunities that our leverage prevents us from exploiting.






24





Our financial condition and results of operations are dependent in part upon our ongoing ability to refinance our maturing indebtedness at attractive interest rates.

Successful execution of our business strategy is dependent in part upon our ability to manage our capital structure to minimize interest expense and enhance free cash flow generation. Our senior secured revolving credit facility has $1.0$1.25 billion in commitments that are scheduled to mature in September 2016.June 2020. In addition, approximately $1.7 billion of obligations under our existing long-term borrowings are scheduled to mature prior to December 31, 2020. We may not be able to refinance our senior secured credit facilities or our other existing indebtedness at or prior to their maturity at attractive rates of interest because of our high levels of debt, debt incurrence restrictions under our debt agreements or because of adverse conditions in credit markets generally.

19





IncreaseAn increase in interest rates may negatively impact our operating results and financial condition.

Certain of our borrowings, including borrowings under our senior secured credit facilities, to the extent the interest rate is not fixed by an interest rate swap, are at variable rates of interest. An increase in interest rates would have a negative impact on our results of operations by causing an increase in interest expense.

As of December 31, 2014,2017, we had $8.6$10.0 billion aggregate principal amount of variable rate long-term indebtedness, of which we have fixed interest rate swaps fix the interest ratecollar contracts on $5.0$4.3 billion in notional amount. We also had a $750 million fixedThe interest rate collar contracts mitigate exposure to floating swapinterest rate fluctuations, but are subject to preserve the ratio of fixedcontractual ceilings and floatingfloors. The interest rate debt that we had prior to the April 2011 debt modification and amendment.collars provide for interest rate protection if one month LIBOR rises above 150 or 175 basis points. As a result, as of December 31, 2014,2017, the impact of a 100 basis point increase in short-term interest rates on an annualized basis compared to the interest rates as of December 31, 2017, which for the one month LIBOR was 1.56%, and a corresponding and parallel shift in the remainder of the yield curve, would result in a $46 million increase our annualin interest expense by approximately $44 million.expense. See the discussion of our interest rate swap transactionscollar contracts in Note 5note 13 "Derivative Financial Instruments" to our Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Our debt agreements contain restrictions that limit our flexibility in operating our business.

The agreements governing our indebtedness contain various covenants that limit our ability to engage in specified types of transactions. These covenants limit our and certain of our subsidiaries' ability to, among other things:

incur additional indebtedness or issue certain preferred shares;
pay dividends on, repurchase, or make distributions in respect of, our capital stock or make other restricted payments;
make certain investments;
sell certain assets;
create liens;
consolidate, merge, sell, or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets; and
enter into certain transactions with our affiliates.

A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under one or more of these agreements, including as a result of cross-default provisions and, in the case of our senior secured revolving credit facility, permit the lenders to cease making loans to us. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under these agreements, the holders of our debt could elect to declare all amounts outstanding thereunder to be immediately due and payable and, in the case of our senior secured revolving credit facility, terminate all commitments to extend further credit. Such actions by these holders could cause cross-defaults under our other indebtedness. If we were unable to repay those amounts, the lenders under our senior secured credit facilities or holders of our senior secured notes could proceed against the collateral securing such debt. We have pledged a significant portion of our assets as collateral under our senior secured credit facilities and our senior secured notes. If the holders of our debt accelerate the repayment of borrowings, we may not have sufficient assets to repay our senior secured credit facilities or any other debt that may become due as a result of that acceleration and we could experience a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our consolidated balance sheet includes significant amounts of goodwill and intangible assets. The impairment of a significant portion of these assets would negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our consolidated balance sheet includes goodwill and intangible assets that represent approximately 60%45% of our total assets atas of December 31, 2014.2017. These assets consist primarily of goodwill and customerclient relationship intangible assets associated with our acquisitions. We also expect to engage in additional acquisitions, which may result in our recognition of additional goodwill and intangible assets. Under current accounting standards, we are required to amortize certain intangible assets over the useful life of the asset, while goodwill and certain other intangible assets are not amortized. On a regular basis we assess whether there have been impairments in the carrying value of goodwill and certain intangible assets. If the carrying value of the asset is determined to be impaired, then it is written down to fair value by a charge to operating earnings. An impairment of a significant portion of goodwill or intangible assets could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

25





Our results of operations may be adversely affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

We are subject to risks related to the changes in currency rates as a result of our investments in non-U.S. operations and from revenues generated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Revenue and profit generated by such non-U.S. operations will increase or decrease compared to prior periods as a result of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. From time to time, we utilize foreign currency forward contracts or other derivative instruments to mitigate the market value risks associated with foreign currency-denominated transactions. These hedge contracts may not, however, eliminate all of the risks related to foreign currency translation. In addition, we may become subject to exchange control regulations that restrict or prohibit the conversion of our other revenue currencies into U.S. dollars. Any of these factors could decrease the value of revenues and earnings we derive from our non-U.S. operations and have a material adverse impact on our business.

Unfavorable resolution of tax contingencies could adversely affect ourtax expense. results of operations and cash flows from operations.

Our tax returns and positions are subject to review and audit by federal, state, local, and international taxing authorities. An unfavorable outcome to a tax audit could result in higher tax expense, thereby negatively impacting our results of operations as well as our cash flows from operations. We have established contingency reserves for material, known tax exposures relating to deductions, transactions, and other matters involving some uncertainty as to the proper tax treatment of the item. These reserves reflect what we believe to be reasonable assumptions as to the likely final resolution of each issue if raised by a taxing authority. While we believe that the reserves are adequate to cover reasonably expected tax risks, there is no assurance that, in all instances, an issue raised by a tax authority will be finally resolved at a financial cost not in excess of any related reserve. An unfavorable resolution, therefore, could negatively impact our effective tax rate, financial position, results of operations, and cash flows in the current and/or future periods. Refer to Note 15note 8 "Income Taxes" to our Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for more information.

As a voluntary filer, the information providedChanges in tax laws and regulations could adversely affectour results of operations and cash flows from operations.

Our operations are subject to tax by federal, state, local, and international taxing jurisdictions. Changes in tax laws, in our periodic reports is subjectsignificant tax jurisdictions could materially increase the amount of taxes we owe, thereby negatively impacting our results of operations as well as our cash flows from operations. For example, although we expect to limited regulatory oversight which may adverselybenefit from the recently enacted changes in US tax laws, the limitations on the deductibility of interest expense in the U.S. negatively impact our ability to provide accurateeffective tax rate, results of operations, and complete financial reports. In addition, we could discontinue filing with the SEC at any time.

cash flows. We are currently a voluntary filerworking to reduce our net interest expense and not subjectincrease our EBITDA in the U.S. However, to the periodic reporting requirements of the SEC. Whileextent we are requiredunable to provide certain information, including financial information, about our company to holders of our indebtedness pursuant tomake enough progress, the agreements governing such indebtedness and our parent company is required to provide certain information to its shareholders, we may discontinue filing periodic reports with the SEC at any time. As a voluntary filer, our periodic reportsnegative impact will be subject to less oversight and regulatory scrutiny than those subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the SEC. In addition, even if we file a registration statement that is declared effective during the year and we become subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the SEC, any of our periodic reporting responsibilities will automatically terminate in the event that we have less than 300 shareholders after the year in which any registration statement that we file with the SEC becomes effective.continue.

Regulatory and Legal Risks

Failure to comply with, or changes in, laws, regulations and enforcement activities may adversely affect the products, services, and markets in which we operate.

We and our customers,clients are subject to laws and regulations that affect the electronic payments industry in the many countries in which our services are used. In particular, our customersclients are subject to numerous laws and regulations applicable to banks, financial institutions, and card issuers in the United States and abroad, and, consequently, we are at times affected by these

20





federal, state, and local laws and regulations. The U.S. Congress and governmental agencies haveUnited States government has increased theirits scrutiny of a number of credit card and other loan practices, from which some of our customersclients derive significant revenue. Regulation of the payments industry, including regulations applicable to us and our customers,clients, has increased significantly in recent years. Failure to comply with laws and regulations applicable to our business may result in the suspension or revocation of licenses or registrations, the limitation, suspension or termination of services, and/or the imposition of consent orders or civil and criminal penalties, including fines which could have an adverse effect on our results of operation and financial condition.

We are subject to U.S. and international financial services regulations, a myriad of consumer protection laws, economic sanctions, laws and regulations, and anti-corruption laws, escheat regulations and privacy and information security regulations to name only a few. Changes to legal rules and regulations, or interpretation or enforcement of them, could have a negative financial effect on us. In particular, changing regulations or standards in the area of privacy and data protection could also adversely impact us. For example, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which becomes effective in May 2018, extends the scope of the E.U. data protection law to all companies processing data of E.U. residents, regardless of the company’s location. The law requires companies to meet new requirements regarding the handling of personal data. Our efforts to comply with GDPR and other privacy and data protection laws may entail substantial expenses, may divert resources from other initiatives and projects, and could limit the services we are able to offer. Further, failure to meet GDPR requirements could result in fines, penalties, and reputational damage. The GDPR and other privacy and data protection laws may be interpreted and applied differently from country to country and may create inconsistent or conflicting requirements. Such regulations increase our compliance and administrative burden

26





significantly. In addition, E.U. laws and regulations are typically subject to different and potentially inconsistent interpretations by the countries that are members of the E.U., which can make compliance more costly and operationally difficult to manage. Moreover, the countries that are members of the E.U. may each have different and potentially inconsistent interpretations of regulations implementing the E.U. Payment Services, which could make compliance more costly and operationally difficult to manage.

Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, which was signed into law in July 2010, significantly changed the U.S.United States financial regulatory system includingby, among other things, creating a new independent agency funded by the Federal Reserve Board, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,CFPB to regulate consumer financial products and services (including many offered by our customers)clients), restrictingrestrict debit card fees paid by merchants to issuer banks and allowingallow merchants to offer discounts for different payment methods. CFPB rules, examinations, and enforcement actions may require us to adjust our activities and may increase our compliance costs. The regulations under the Dodd-Frank Act require all debit card issuing financial institutions to participate in at least two, unaffiliated debit networks (banning exclusivity agreements between one debit network and one debit card issuer) and prohibit card issuers and payment networks from inhibiting the ability of merchants to choose among the enabled debit networks for the routing of each debit card transaction. Changes to the Dodd-Frank Act or regulations could adversely impact our debit network business. In addition, certain of our alliance partners are subject to regulation by federal and state authority and, as a result, could pass through some of those compliance obligations to us.

Failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, anti-money laundering, economic and trade sanctions regulations, and similar laws could subject us to penalties and other adverse consequences.

We operate our business around the world, including in certain foreign countries with developing economies, where companies often engage in business practices that are prohibited by U.S. and U.K. regulations, including the FCPA and the U.K. Bribery Act. Such laws prohibit improper payments or offers of payments to foreign governments and their officials and political parties by the U.S. and other business entities for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. We have implemented policies to discourage such practices; however, there can be no assurance that all of our employees, consultants, and agents, including those that may be based in or from countries where practices that violate U.S. laws may be customary, will not take actions in violation of our policies, for which we may be ultimately responsible.

In addition, we are subject to anti-money laundering laws and regulations, including the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). Among other things, the BSA requires money services businesses (such as money transmitters and providers of prepaid access) to develop and implement risk-based anti-money laundering programs, report large cash transactions and suspicious activity, and maintain transaction records. Our subsidiary Money Network Financial LLC provides prepaid access for various open loop prepaid programs for which it is the program manager and therefore must meet the requirements of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, the agency that enforces the BSA.

We are also subject to certain economic and trade sanctions programs that are administered by the OFAC which prohibit or restrict transactions to or from or dealings with specified countries, their governments, and in certain circumstances, their nationals, and with individuals and entities that are specially-designated nationals of those countries, narcotics traffickers, and terrorists or terrorist organizations.

Similar anti-money laundering and counter terrorist financing and proceeds of crime laws apply to movements of currency and payments through electronic transactions and to dealings with persons specified in lists maintained by the country equivalents to OFAC lists in several other countries and require specific data retention obligations to be observed by intermediaries in the payment process. Our businesses in those jurisdictions are subject to those data retention obligations.

Failure to comply with any of these laws and regulations or changes in this regulatory environment, including changing interpretations and the implementation of new or varying regulatory requirements by the government, may result in significant financial penalties, reputational harm, or change the manner in which we currently conduct some aspects of our business, which could significantly affect our results of operations or financial condition.

Changes in credit card association or other network rules or standards could adversely affect our business.

In order to provide our transaction processing services, several of our subsidiaries are registered with Visa and MasterCard and other networks as members or service providers for member institutions. As such, we and many of our customersclients are subject to card association and network rules that could subject us or our customersclients to a variety of fines or penalties that may be levied by the card associations or networks for certain acts or omissions by us, acquirer customers,acquiring clients, processing customers,clients, and merchants. Visa, MasterCard, and other networks, some of which are our competitors, set the rules and standards with respect to which we must comply. The termination of our member registration or our status as a certified service provider, or any changes in card association or other network rules or standards, including interpretation and implementation of the rules or standards, that increase the cost of doing business or limit

27





our ability to provide transaction processing services to or through our customers,clients, could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Failure to protect our intellectual property rights and defend ourselves from potential patent infringement claims may diminish our competitive advantages or restrict itus from delivering our services.

Our trademarks, patents, and other intellectual property are important to our future success. The FIRST DATAFirst Data trademark and trade name and the STAR trademark and trade name are intellectual property rights which are individually material to us. These trademarks and trade names are widely recognized and associated with quality and reliable service. Loss of the proprietary use of the FIRST DATAFirst Data or STAR trademarks and trade names or a diminution in the perceived quality associated with them could harm the growth of our businesses. We also rely on proprietary technology. It is possible that others will independently develop the same or similar technology. AssuranceFurther, we use open source architecture in connection with our solutions, in particular our Clover open architecture platform. Companies that incorporate open source platforms into their solutions have, from time to time, faced claims challenging the ownership of protectingsuch platforms. As a result, we could be subject to suits by parties claiming ownership of what we believe to be open source software. We cannot guarantee that we can protect our trade secrets, know-how, or other proprietary information cannot be guaranteed.information. Our patents could be challenged, invalidated or circumvented by others, and may not be of sufficient scope or strength to provide us with any meaningful protection or advantage. If we are unable to maintain the proprietary nature of our technologies, we could lose competitive advantages and be materially adversely affected. TheAdditionally, the laws of certain foreignnon-U.S. countries in whichwhere we do business or contemplate doing business in the future domay not recognize intellectual property rights or protect them to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. Adverse determinations in judicial or administrative proceedings could prevent us from selling our services or prevent us from preventing others from selling competing services, and thereby may have a material adverse effect on the business and results of operations. Additionally, claims have been made, are currently pending, and other claims may be made in the future, with regard to our technology allegedly infringing on a patent or other intellectual property rights. Unfavorable resolution of these claims could either result in us being restricted from delivering the related product or service or result in a settlement that could be materially adverse to us.

Failure to comply with state and federal antitrust requirements could adversely affect our business.

Through our merchant alliances, we hold an ownership interest in several competing merchant acquiring businesses while serving as an electronic processor for those businesses. In order to satisfy state and federal antitrust requirements, we actively maintain an antitrust compliance program. Notwithstanding our compliance program, it is possible that perceived or actual violationviolations of state or federal antitrust requirements could give rise to regulatory enforcement investigations or actions. Regulatory scrutiny of, or regulatory enforcement action in connection with, compliance with state and federal antitrust requirements could have a material adverse effect on our reputation and business.


21





We are the subject of various legal proceedings which could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and profitability.

We are involved in various litigation matters. We are also involved in or are the subject of governmental or regulatory agency inquiries or investigations and makesmake voluntary self-disclosures to government or regulatory agencies from time to time. Our insurance or indemnities may not cover all claims that may be asserted against us, and any claims asserted against us, regardless of merit or eventual outcome, may harm our reputation. If we are unsuccessful in our defense in thethese litigation matters, or any other legal proceeding, we may be forced to pay damages or fines, enter into consent decrees, and/or change our business practices, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and profitability.

Our ability to utilize net operating loss carryforwards could be limited if we were to experience an ownership change as defined in the Internal Revenue Code.

Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (Code), contains rules that impose an annual limitation on the ability of a company with net operating loss carryforwards that undergoes an ownership change, which is generally any change in ownership of more than 50% of its stock (by value) over a three-year period, to utilize its net operating loss carryforwards in years after the ownership change. These rules generally operate by focusing on ownership changes among holders owning directly or indirectly 5% or more of the shares of stock of a company or any change in ownership arising from a new issuance of shares of stock by such company. If a company’s income in any year is less than the annual limitation prescribed by Section 382 of the Code, the unused portion of such limitation amount may be carried forward to increase the limitation (and net operating loss carryforward utilization) in subsequent tax years.

Our initial public offering in October 2015 and the subsequent follow-on secondary offering in September 2017 did not result in an ownership change within a three-year period for purposes of Section 382 of the Code. If, however, we were to undergo an ownership change as a result of future transactions involving our common stock, including a follow-on offering of our common

28





stock or purchases or sales of common stock between 5% holders, our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards would be subject to the limitations of Section 382 of the Code. It is possible that a portion of our net operating loss carryforwards may expire before we would be able to use them. In the event we are unable to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards, there may be a negative impact on our financial position and results of operations.

In addition to the aforementioned federal income tax implications pursuant to Section 382 of the Code, most states follow the general provisions of Section 382 of the Code, either explicitly or implicitly resulting in separate state net operating loss limitations.

Risks Related to Ownership Structure

Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. (KKR) controls us and its interests may conflict with ours or yours in the future.

KKR controls a majority of the combined voting power of our common stock. As a result, KKR has the ability to elect all of the members of our Board and thereby control our policies and operations, including the appointment of management, future issuances of our Class A common stock or other securities, the payment of dividends, if any, on our Class A common stock, the incurrence of debt by us, amendments to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, and the entering into of extraordinary transactions and the interests of KKR may not in all cases be aligned with your interests.

In addition, KKR may have an interest in pursuing acquisitions, divestitures and other transactions that, in its judgment, could enhance its investment, even though such transactions might involve risks to you. For example, KKR could cause us to make acquisitions that increase our indebtedness or cause us to sell revenue-generating assets. KKR is in the business of making investments in companies and may from time to time acquire and hold interests in businesses that compete directly or indirectly with us. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that none of KKR or any director who is not employed by us (including any nonemployee director who serves as one of our officers in both his or her director and officer capacities) or his or her affiliates will have any duty to refrain from engaging, directly or indirectly, in the same business activities or similar business activities or lines of business in which we operate. KKR also may pursue acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to our business, and, as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us.

So long as a KKR affiliate continues to beneficially own a sufficient number of shares of Class B common stock, even if it beneficially owns significantly less than 50% of the shares of our outstanding common stock, it will continue to be able to effectively control our decisions. For example, if our Class B common stock amounted to 15% of our outstanding common stock, beneficial owners of our Class B common stock (including KKR), would collectively control 64% of the voting power of our common stock. The shares of our Class B common stock beneficially owned by a KKR affiliate may be transferred to an unrelated third party if the holders of a majority of the shares of Class B common stock have consented to such transfer in writing in advance.

In addition, KKR will be able to determine the outcome of all matters requiring stockholder approval and will be able to cause or prevent a change of control of our Company or a change in the composition of our Board and could preclude any acquisition of our Company. This concentration of voting control could deprive you of an opportunity to receive a premium for your shares of Class A common stock as part of a sale of our Company and ultimately might affect the market price of our Class A common stock.
ITEM 1B.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
 
None.
ITEM 2. 
PROPERTIES
 
As of December 31, 2014,2017, we and our subsidiaries owned or leased 6779 domestic properties and 9072 international properties. These facilities are used for operational, sales and administrative purposes, and are substantially all currently being utilized.
 Leased Facilities Owned Facilities
 No. Sq. Ft. No. Sq. Ft.
Facilities in the United States 
  
  
  
Merchant Solutions25
 691,349
 4
 498,281
Financial Services13
 531,107
 11
 1,555,919
All Other and Corporate12
 960,495
 2
 140,762
International Facilities81
 907,146
 9
 357,569
 Leased Facilities Owned Facilities
 No. Sq. Ft. No. Sq. Ft.
Facilities in the United States68
 2,314,559
 11
 1,592,740
International Facilities64
 1,062,884
 8
 409,899

MerchantGlobal Business Solutions’ principal operations are conducted in Melville,Atlanta, Georgia; New York, New York; Coral Springs, Florida; Hagerstown, Maryland; Houston, Texas;King of Prussia, Pennsylvania; Chicago, Illinois; Marietta, Georgia; London, United Kingdom; São Paulo, Brazil; Singapore, Singapore; Warsaw, Poland; and Marietta, Georgia. TheBuenos Aires, Argentina.

29






Global Financial Solutions' principal operations for Financial Services are located in New York, New York; Omaha, Nebraska; Chesapeake, Virginia; London, United Kingdom; Warsaw, Poland; Buenos Aires, Argentina; Attica, Greece; and Frankfurt, Germany.

Network & Security Solutions' principal operations are located in Atlanta, Georgia; Omaha, Nebraska; Sugar Land, Texas; Wilmington, Delaware; and Maitland, Florida. The principal operations for International are located in Basildon, United Kingdom; Frankfurt, Germany; Buenos Aires, Argentina; Athens (Kryoneri), Greece; Thane, India; and Sydney, Australia. Greenwood Village, Colorado.

Our All Other and Corporate facilities include New York, New York;York and Atlanta, Georgia; and Greenwood Village, Colorado.Georgia.

We believe that our facilities are suitable and adequate for our current business; however, we periodically review our space requirements and may acquire new space to meet the needs of our businesses or consolidate and dispose of or sublet facilities which are no longer required.
ITEM 3.   
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
From time to time, we are involved in various litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of our business. None of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, currently is material to us. Information with respect to this item may be found in note 14 “Commitments and Contingencies” to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
ITEM 4. 
MININGMINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
 
Not applicable.

2230





PART II
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
 
Our Class A common stock has traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "FDC" since October 15, 2015. Prior to that date, there was no public trading market for our common stock.

Price Range of Class A common stock

The information presented in the table below represents the high and low closing sales prices per share of Class A common stock as reported on the NYSE for the periods indicated. There is currently no established public trading market for our Class B common stock. We had one

  High Low
2016    
First Quarter $15.95
 $8.67
Second Quarter $13.34
 $10.13
Third Quarter $14.48
 $10.66
Fourth Quarter $15.53
 $13.03
2017    
First Quarter $16.63
 $14.88
Second Quarter $18.71
 $14.81
Third Quarter $19.04
 $17.47
Fourth Quarter $19.08
 $15.97

There were 25 holders of record holder of our Class A common stock and 22 holders of record of our Class B common stock as of December 31, 2017. The number of beneficial owners of our Class A common stock is substantially greater than the number of record holders, because a large portion of our Class A common stock is held in "street name" by banks and brokers.

Share Buy Back

In connection with the vesting of restricted stock awards, shares of Class A common stock are delivered to the Company by employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations. The following table summarizes such purchases of Class A common stock in the three months ended December 31, 2017:
  Total Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Paid Per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased Under Announced Program Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under Announced Programs
October 1, 2017 through October 31, 2017 
 
 
 
November 1, 2017 through November 30, 2017 
 
 
 
December 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 288,134
(a) 
$16.71
 
 
(a)
Shares surrendered to the Company to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock awards issued to employees.

Dividend Policy

Since our initial public offering (IPO) on February 27,October 15, 2015, we have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock, and we have no equity securitiescurrent plan to do so. Because a significant portion of ours are authorized for issuanceour operations is through our subsidiaries, our ability to pay dividends depends in part on our receipt of cash dividends from our operating subsidiaries, which may further restrict our ability to pay dividends as a result of the laws of their jurisdiction of organization, agreements of our subsidiaries or covenants under any equity compensation plan.
existing and future outstanding indebtedness we or our subsidiaries incur. In 2014, we paid five dividends totaling $686 million. In 2013, we paid three dividends totaling $28 million. Theaddition, the senior secured revolving credit facility, senior secured term loan facility, and the indentures governing the senior secured notes, senior unsecured notes, and senior subordinated notes limit our ability to pay dividends. See “Management’s Discussion


31






Stock Performance Graph

The following graph shows a comparison from October 15, 2015 (the date our Class A common stock commenced trading on the NYSE) through December 31, 2017 of the cumulative total return for our Class A common stock, the S&P 500 Index and Analysisthe S&P Information Technology Index. Data for the S&P 500 Index and the S&P Information Technology Index assume reinvestment of Financial Conditiondividends. Note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

This performance graph shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and ResultsExchange Commission for purposes of Operations - Capital ResourcesSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that Section, and Liquidity” included in Part II, Item 7 and Note 10 "Firstshall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of First Data Corporation Stockholder's Equity and Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest" to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8under the Securities Act of this Form 10-K.1933, as amended.
ITEM 6. 
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
 
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated financial data as of the dates and for the periods indicated. The selected financial data as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 and for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The selected consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 and for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto not included in this Form 10-K.

32






The results of operations for any period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period. The selected consolidated financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with, "Management’sand are qualified by reference to "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included in Part II, Item 7 and the Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in Part II, Item 8 of this formForm 10-K.
 
The Notesnotes to our Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K contain additional information about various acquisitions, dispositions, and certain charges and benefits resulting from other operating expenses, and other income (expense) which affect the comparability of information presented.

Amounts below include acquisitions since the date acquired.
 December 31, December 31,
(in millions) 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010
(in millions, except per share amounts) 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 
Statement of operations data (Year-end):  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
    
 
Revenues $11,151.8
 $10,808.9
 $10,680.3
 $10,713.6
 $10,380.4
 $12,052
 $11,584
 $11,451
 $11,152
 $10,809
 
Total revenues (excluding reimbursables) 8,129
 7,839
 7,764
 7,548
 7,302
 
Operating expenses (a) 9,699.3
 9,630.3
 9,578.3
 9,728.2
 9,782.2
 10,195
 9,921
 10,228
 9,701
 9,629
 
Other operating expenses (b) 13.2
 56.0
 28.2
 43.9
 81.5
Interest expense (1,753.0) (1,880.7) (1,897.8) (1,833.1) (1,796.6)
Net loss (264.5) (692.1) (527.3) (336.1) (846.9)
Net loss attributable to First Data Corporation (457.8) (869.1) (700.9) (516.1) (1,021.8)
Other operating expenses, net (b) 143
 61
 53
 13
 56
 
Total expenses (excluding reimbursables) 6,415
 6,237
 6,594
 6,110
 6,178
 
Interest expense, net (937) (1,068) (1,537) (1,728) (1,856) 
Net income (loss) 1,664
 660
 (1,268) (265) (775) 
Net income (loss) attributable to First Data Corporation 1,465
 420
 (1,481) (458) (952) 
Depreciation and amortization (c) 1,163.3
 1,211.9
 1,330.9
 1,344.2
 1,526.0
 1,073
 1,061
 1,133
 1,163
 1,212
 
Net income (loss) per share (d):           
Basic $1.60
 $0.47
 $(7.70) $(458,000) $(952,000) 
Diluted 1.56
 0.46
 (7.70) (458,000) (952,000) 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (d):           
Basic (f) 916
 902
 192
 
 
 
Diluted (f) 940
 921
 192
 
 
 
Balance sheet data (As of year-end):    
  
  
  
    
  
    
 
Total assets $34,269.3
 $35,239.8
 $37,899.0
 $40,276.3
 $37,544.1
 $48,269
 $40,292
 $34,362
 $34,034
 $34,962
 
Total current and long-term settlement assets 7,558.4
 7,557.0
 9,228.1
 10,839.3
 7,059.1
Settlement assets 20,363
 14,795
 8,150
 7,557
 7,553
 
Total liabilities 31,551.1
 33,477.9
 35,205.2
 36,800.9
 33,456.1
 42,183
 36,088
 30,625
 31,434
 33,318
 
Settlement obligations 7,557.3
 7,553.4
 9,226.3
 10,837.8
 7,058.9
 20,363
 14,795
 8,150
 7,557
 7,553
 
Long-term borrowings 20,711.4
 22,556.8
 22,528.9
 22,521.7
 22,438.8
 17,927
 18,131
 18,737
 20,697
 22,499
 
Other long-term liabilities (d) 1,309.1
 1,303.1
 1,331.4
 1,459.0
 2,153.3
Other long-term liabilities (e) 963
 1,240
 1,243
 1,223
 1,202
 
Redeemable noncontrolling interest 70.4
 69.1
 67.4
 67.4
 28.1
 72
 73
 77
 70
 69
 
Total equity 2,647.8
 1,692.8
 2,626.4
 3,408.0
 4,059.9
 6,014
 4,131
 3,660
 2,530
 1,575
 
Cash flow data (Year-end):           
Net cash provided by operating activities $2,047
 $2,111
 $795
 $1,035
 $715
 
Net cash used in investing activities (1,950) (387) (685) (329) (353) 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 9
 (1,734) (16) (743) (532) 
(a) Operating expenses include Cost of services; Cost of products sold; Selling, general, and administrative; Depreciation and amortization; and Reimbursable debit network fees, postage and other; and Depreciation and amortization.other.
(b) Other operating expenses, include Restructuring,net includes restructuring, net; Impairments; Litigationimpairments; litigation and regulatory settlements; integration cost and Otherother as applicable to the periods presented. See note 10 "Other Operating Expenses" to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for details.
(c)Includes amortization of initial payments for new contracts, which is recorded as a contra-revenue within “Transaction and processing service fees” and amortization related to equity method investments, which is netted within “Equity earnings in affiliates” in the Consolidated Statementsour consolidated statements of Operations.operations.
(d)As a result of the HoldCo Merger, all outstanding shares of FDH were converted into Class B common stock, which are entitled to ten votes per share. All of FDC's outstanding common stock was eliminated upon the merger. We accounted for the HoldCo Merger as a transfer of assets between entities under common control and have reflected the transactions impact on net loss per share and weighted-average shares on a prospective basis.
(e)Other long-term liabilities include Long-term deferredDeferred tax liabilities.
(f) Prior to our Initial Public Offering in 2015, we had 1,000 shares of common stock that was eliminated upon the merger with First Data Holdings.


2333





ITEM 7. 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Executive Overview

We operate electronic commerce businesses providing services that include merchant transaction processing and acquiring services; credit, retail, and debit card issuing and processing services; prepaid card services; and check verification, settlement and guarantee services.
For the year ended December 31, 2014, revenues and operating profits increased 3% to $11.2 billion and 28% to $1.4 billion, respectively, led by growth in the Financial Services and International segments. Currency negatively impacted revenue and operating profit by 1% and 2%, respectively.
Net loss attributable to First Data for the year ended December 31, 2014 improved 47% to $458 million and in the fourth quarter of 2014, we generated net income of $12 million, the first profitable quarter since the 2007 privatization.
During 2014, we made significant changes to our capital structure. This included our parent company, First Data Holdings Inc. (FDH), completing a $3.5 billion private equity placement. $2.5 billion of the net proceeds were contributed to us as a capital contribution and used to strengthen our balance sheet by paying down debt. Additionally, we repriced $5.7 billion of our 2018 Term Loans. As a result, we now have a weighted average interest rate of 7.4% across the debt and as of December 31, 2014, approximately 80% of our debt is at a fixed rate, providing a measure of protection if interest rates begin to rise. These combined actions improved net leverage by 1.3 turns and will significantly lower annual cash interest payments by approximately $228 million.

Recently, we launched several new products that help our clients grow their businesses including:

Clover Station - our tablet based integrated point of sale solution that radically simplifies the way small and medium businesses operate.
InsighticsSM - an innovative cloud-based software that unlocks the power of big data behind payment transactions to give small and medium size business merchants the ability to monitor key business metrics affecting their business, better understand customers to engage effectively, and derive more value from marketing and loyalty programs to grow revenue.
Perka- a digital loyalty marketing platform, an alternative to traditional paper and plastic card-based incentive programs. With Perka, virtually any merchant can customize and launch a mobile loyalty program that works on all cell phones, creating customer loyalty and driving growth.
Gyft - the leading digital platform that enables consumers to buy, send, manage, and redeem gift cards using mobile devices. Gyft’s exceptional capabilities, combined with our long-standing leadership in prepaid solutions, create a distinct combination in a rapidly growing market for virtual gift cards. Additionally, in October Gyft became the first gift card solution to enable consumers to buy virtual gift cards with Apple Pay's in-app payment functionality.

In 2015, we will launch Clover Mobile, which gives businesses all the great functionality of Clover Station, but with the freedom of being entirely untethered from the countertop, whether it is within their store or on the road.

We have also partnered with both Visa and MasterCard to advance Europay, MasterCard and Visa (EMV) in the U.S. as our STAR network became one of the first debit networks to assist issuers, acquirers, and merchants with equal access to a shared EMV chip card technology. Furthermore, we have partnered with Verifone to help U.S. merchants reduce exposure to payment data breaches and expedite merchant acceptance of EMV. Through this relationship, payment data will flow through First Data's TransArmor data protection solution, enabling encrypted delivery directly to First Data from the Verifone payment terminal. We also collaborated with Apple as part of its Apple Pay initiative, supporting both our issuing and our merchant clients as the industry continues to evolve towards mobile.

Internationally, we expanded our presence in Brazil in the third quarter of 2014 with our launch of BIN, our acquiring solution developed specifically for Brazil. Brazil is one of the fastest-growing payments markets in the world and our partnership with local banking cooperative, Bancoob, is providing access to an existing base of merchants and sponsorship to expand into other areas within Brazil.


24





Segment Discussion

During the first quarter of 2014, we renamed our Retail and Alliance Services segment to Merchant Solutions to better reflect our transformation from a processor to a solutions and technology provider.

On October 1, 2014, we announced the expansion of our Management Committee. We are evaluating the changes to our reporting that may be made as a result of the expansion, to best assist the chief operating decision maker (our Chief Executive Officer) in monitoring and managing the businesses. Should the reporting change, we will retroactively revise our segment disclosures.
Merchant Solutions segment The Merchant Solutions segment is comprised of businesses that provide services which facilitate the merchants’ ability to accept credit, debit, stored-value and loyalty cards, and checks. The segment’s merchant processing and acquiring services include authorization, transaction capture, settlement, chargeback handling and Internet-based transaction processing and are the largest component of the segment’s revenue. A majority of these services pertain to transactions in which consumer payments to merchants are made through a payment network (such as VISA or MasterCard), a debit network (such as STAR Network, which is owned by us), or other payment issuers/networks (such as American Express and Discover).

Many of the segment’s services are offered through alliance arrangements. Financial results of the merchant alliance strategy appear both in the “Transaction and processing service fees” and “Equity earnings in affiliates” line items of the Consolidated Statements of Operations. We evaluate the Merchant Solutions segment based on our proportionate share of the results of these alliances. Refer to “Segment results” below for a more detailed discussion.
Merchant processing and acquiring revenues are driven most significantly by the number of transactions, dollar volumes of those transactions, and trends in consumer spending between national, regional, and local merchants. Consumers continue to increase the use of credit, debit, and stored-value cards in place of cash and paper checks. Internet payments continue to grow and are becoming a larger portion of our transactions. While transactions over the internet may involve increased risk, these transactions typically generate higher profits for us. We continue to enhance our fraud detection and other systems to address such risks.
In addition, Merchant Solutions provides check verification, settlement, and guarantee services. We continue to see a decrease in the use of checks which negatively affects our check verification, settlement, and guarantee business. The segment also manages prepaid stored-value card issuance and processing services (i.e. gift cards) for retailers and others.
Financial Services segment The Financial Services segment provides issuer card and network solutions and payment management solutions for card-based payments. Financial Services also offers services to facilitate customer communications, billing, online banking, and consumer bill payment. Issuer card and network solutions includes credit, retail, and debit card processing, debit network services, and output services for financial institutions and other organizations offering credit cards, debit cards, and retail private label cards to consumers and businesses to manage customer accounts. Output services include statement and letter printing, embossing (including EMV chip-card personalization), and mailing services. The segment also provides remittance processing services, information services, and other payment services such as remote deposit, clearing services, and processing for payments which occur in such forms as checks, ACH, wire transfer, and stored-value cards. The segment’s largest components of revenue consist of processing services including account management, transaction authorization and posting and network switching.
Credit and retail based revenue is derived primarily from the card processing services offered to financial institutions and other issuers of cards. Revenue from these markets is driven primarily by accounts on file, with active accounts having a larger impact on revenue than inactive accounts. Retail account portfolios typically have a lower proportionate share of active accounts than credit account portfolios and product usage is different between the card types resulting in lower revenue per active retail account. In addition, contract pricing at the customer level is dependent upon the volume of accounts, mix of account types (e.g. retail, credit, co-branded credit and debit) and product usage.
Debit processing revenue is derived mostly from the processing of transactions where we could receive multiple fees for a transaction, depending on our role. We continue to see a shift to the use of debit and credit cards from checks and cash. The shift to debit cards negatively affects our remittance processing business.
The underlying economic drivers of credit card issuance are population demographics and employment. Strengthening in the economy typically results in an improved credit risk profile, allowing card issuers to be more aggressive in their marketing

25





campaigns to issue cards. Conversely, a weakening in the economy typically results in a tightening of the credit market with fewer consumers qualifying for credit.
International segment The primary service offerings of the International segment are substantially the same as those provided in the Merchant Solutions and Financial Services segments.
The International acquiring services facilitate the merchants’ ability to accept credit, debit, and stored-value cards. The segment’s merchant processing and acquiring services include authorization, transaction capture, settlement, chargeback handling, and Internet based transaction processing and are the largest component of the segment’s revenue.

The International issuing services provide issuer card, output services, ATM services,following contains management’s discussion and professional services. Issuer card and network solutions includes credit, retail, and debit card processing for financial institutions and other organizations offering credit cards, debit cards, and retail private label cards to consumers and businesses to manage customer accounts. Output services include statement and letter printing, embossing and mailing services, and call center services. ATM services include processing, acquiring, and switching services. Additionally, the International issuing services provides licensing for card processing software, and professional services.

The International segment revenue drivers are similar to the Merchant Solutions and Financial Services segment. The International acquiring service revenues are driven most significantly by the number of transactions, dollar volumes of those transactions, and trends in consumer spending. The International issuing service revenues for issuer card and network solutions are driven primarily by accounts on file, with active accounts having a larger impact on revenue than inactive accounts. Additionally, the International segment revenue is impacted by foreign exchange rate movements as well as the macroeconomic forces within countries where the services are being sold.

All Other and Corporate

All Other and Corporate is comprisedanalysis of our business units notfinancial condition and results of operations and should be read together with “Selected Financial Data,” included in the segments noted above, primarily our government services business and our official check business that is winding down, as well as our support functions.
Components of Revenue and Expenses
For a description of the components of operating revenues and expenses as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, refer to Part I,II, Item 16 of this Form 10-K. Descriptions of the revenue recognition policies are10-K and our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in Note 1 "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements and involves numerous risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those set forth under “Forward-Looking Statements,” “Risk Factors,” and elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

Year over year percent changes are calculated on whole-dollar values as management views this as a more accurate representation of our performance. As such, the values here-in may not recalculate due to rounding.
Executive Overview

First Data Corporation sits at the center of global electronic commerce. We believe we offer our clients the most complete array of integrated solutions in the industry, covering their needs across next generation commerce technologies, merchant acquiring, issuing, and network solutions. We serve our clients in over 100 countries, reaching approximately 6 million business locations over the course of a year and over 4,000 financial institutions. We believe we have the industry’s largest distribution network, driven by our partnerships with many of the world’s leading financial institutions, our direct sales force, and a network of distribution partners. We are the largest merchant acquirer, issuer processor, and independent network services provider in the world, enabling businesses to accept electronic payments, helping financial institutions issue credit, debit and prepaid cards, and routing secure transactions between them. In 2017, we processed 93 billion transactions globally, or approximately 3,000 transactions per second. In our largest market, the United States, we processed $2.1 trillion of payment volume, representing over 10% of United States gross domestic product (GDP) last year.

Our business is characterized by transaction related fees, multi-year contracts, and a diverse client base, which allows us to grow alongside our clients. Our multi-year contracts allow us to achieve a high level of recurring revenues with the same clients. While the contracts typically do not specify fixed revenues to be realized thereunder, they do provide a framework for revenues to be generated based on volume of services provided during such contracts term. Our business also generally requires minimal incremental capital expenditures and working capital to support additional revenue within our existing business lines.
Our Strategy

Our ability to grow our business is influenced by global expenditure growth, increasing our share in electronic payments and providing value-added products and services. We grow our business through diversification of product offerings such as credit, debit, prepaid, Clover, and our suite of security products. We believe we offer our clients the most complete array of integrated solutions in our industry, covering their needs across next-generation commerce technology, merchant acquiring, issuing, and network solutions. We believe this differentiates us from our competition and will continue to drive our growth in the future.
We work with a variety of partners to deliver our solutions. We help merchants by delivering data-driven insights and other services to help them grow and create better and secure purchase experiences for consumers across all commerce platforms. We assist merchants in day-to-day operations of their business via our Clover line of products which enables merchants to more efficiently run their businesses, build customer loyalty, and gain valuable insights that help grow their businesses. We provide financial institutions with solutions to help them grow their revenues, enhance customer satisfaction, and deliver their products more timely and efficiently.

We continue to execute on key initiatives:
Innovate for tomorrow's client needs
Accelerate top line revenue growth
Maintain positive operating leverage
Generate significant free cash flow



34





Components of Revenue

We generate revenue by providing commerce-enabling solutions. Set forth below is a description of our revenues by segment and factors impacting total revenues.

Global Business Solutions

Global Business Solutions (GBS) revenues are primarily derived from processing credit and debit card transactions for business clients and also include fees for providing processing, loyalty and software services, and sales and leases of POS devices. Revenues are generated from a variety of sources:

Discount fees, net of credit and debit card interchange and assessment fees charged by the payment networks. The discount fee is typically either a percentage of the purchase amount or an interchange fee plus a fixed dollar amount;
Processing fees charged to our alliances;
Processing fees charged to merchant acquirers who have outsourced their transaction processing to us;
Sales and leases of POS devices;
Fees from providing reporting and other services; and
Software fees such as security and Clover related fees.

A substantial portion of our business within GBS is conducted through merchant alliances between us and financial institutions. If we have management control over an alliance, then the alliance's financial statements are consolidated with ours and the related processing fees are treated as an intercompany transaction and eliminated upon consolidation. If we do not have management control over an alliance, we use the equity method of accounting. As a result, our consolidated revenues include processing fees charged to alliances accounted for under the equity method.

A large portion of GBS' revenue is derived from transaction and processing related services. This business is dependent on macroeconomic consumer trends and global economic conditions that affect the volume of consumer spending and the use of electronic payments and changes in these factors have in the past, impacted, and may in the future impact, our ability to grow this portion of the business. We have begun to implement recent initiatives, such as the introduction of several new products and expansion of our sales force, expanding through ISV partnerships, and expansion into new international markets in an effort to grow this business versus prior periods. We also completed acquisitions which have strengthened our presence in ISV and enterprise resource planning (ERP) integrated payment solutions.

Global Financial Solutions

Global Financial Solutions (GFS) revenues are derived from outsourced account processing services, customer communications, plastics personalization, remittance processing services, software solutions for clients to support in-house card processing, as well as other account services we provide to financial institutions. Revenues for GFS services are typically generated on the basis of number of total or active card accounts on file, volume of customer communications, volume of plastics personalized and mailed, volume of remittances processed, and license fees for our software solutions.

Network & Security Solutions

Network & Security Solutions (NSS) revenues are primarily derived from network services such as Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) Network Solutions, Stored Value Network Solutions, Security and Fraud Management Solutions, and Government Solutions or Other.
Factors Affecting the Comparability of Our Results of Operations

As a result of a number of factors, our historical results of operations are not comparable from period to period and may not be comparable to our financial results of operations in future periods. Key factors affecting the comparability of our results of operations are summarized below.


35





Currency Impact

Although the majority of our revenue is earned in U.S. dollars, a portion of our revenues and expenses are in foreign currencies. As a result, changes in foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar can impact our results of operations. Additionally, we have intercompany debts in foreign currencies, which impacts our results of operations. We believe the presentation of constant currency provides relevant information and we use this non-GAAP financial measure to, among other things, evaluate our ongoing operations in relation to foreign currency fluctuations. The presentation of non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for our related financial results prepared in accordance with GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles). For additional information on our constant currency calculation, see “Segment Results” within this Form 10-K.

Acquisitions and Dispositions

Acquisitions and dispositions over the past year have affected the comparability of our results. The largest acquisitions in 2017, CardConnect and BluePay, are being integrated into our Global Business Solutions segment and the results for the current period are included within the segment results.

Restructuring and Cost Management Initiatives

We continually evaluate our cost base and over the past three years have executed a number of restructuring initiatives, which have allowed us to streamline management, eliminate excess facilities, and work with our suppliers to lower costs. In connection with these initiatives, we have incurred restructuring charges of $83 million, $49 million and $53 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. These Restructuring and Cost Management Initiatives have contributed to our 270 basis points EBITDA margin expansion over the past three years. The Company has ongoing expense management initiatives, which are expected to result in approximately $20 million in additional restructuring costs over the course of 2018. In connection with our focus on maintaining positive operating leverage, we will likely incur additional restructuring costs in the future. See note 10 “Other Operating Expenses” to our consolidated financial statements in Part II of this Form 10-K for additional information about our restructuring and cost savings initiatives.

Interest Expense

As a result of our capital market activities we have lowered the weighted-average interest rate of our outstanding debt from 5.0% as of December 31, 2016 to 4.8% as of December 31, 2017. Due to the current year acquisitions, we have increased our outstanding borrowings balance from $18.5 billion as of December 31, 2016 to $19.2 billion as of December 31, 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we incurred $10 million in fees to modify existing long-term debt which is recorded within "Interest expense, net" in the consolidated statements of operations.

Debt Extinguishment Costs

We incurred $80 million, $70 million, and $1.1 billion of losses on debt extinguishment during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

The table below shows the stock-based compensation expense split between Cost of services and Selling, general, and administrative expense.
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions) 2017 2016 2015
Cost of services $72
 $112
 $130
Selling, general, and administrative 173
 151
 199
Total $245
 $263
 $329

See note 4 “Stock Compensation Plans��� to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information about our stock compensation plans.





36





Management Fee Expenses

For the year ended December 31, 2015, we incurred approximately $100 million in KKR related expenses, of which $78 million related to the termination of our Management Agreement with KKR.
Results of Operations
 
Consolidated results should be read in conjunction with Note 13note 7 "Segment Information" to our Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K, which provides more detailed discussions concerning certain components of the Consolidated Statementsour consolidated statements of Operations.operations. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated within the consolidated results.
Operating revenues overview
  Year ended December 31, Percent Change
(in millions) 2014 2013 2012 2014 vs. 2013 2013 vs. 2012
Transaction and processing service fees $6,655.5
 $6,464.3
 $6,452.1
  3%   %
Product sales and other 892.8
 837.2
 866.7
  7%  (3)%
Reimbursable debit network fees, postage, and other 3,603.5
 3,507.4
 3,361.5
  3%  4 %
Total revenues $11,151.8
 $10,808.9
 $10,680.3
  3%  1 %
Overview

Transaction and processing service feesRevenue for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased 4% to $12.1 billion from $11.6 billion in 2016 while operating profits increased 7% to $1.7 billion from $1.6 billion in 2016. On a constant currency basis, revenue increased 4%, driven primarily by our GBS segment. Foreign currency did not impact total revenue, however it negatively impacted operating profit by 1%.

Net income attributable to First Data Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2017 improved to $1.5 billion from $420 million during 2014 comparedthe same period in 2016. The improvement in net income is attributable to 2013 primarily due to increased card servicesan income tax benefit of $810 million, lower interest expense of $131 million, and merchant related servicesan increase in operating profit of $112 million driven by revenue as a result of net new business and organic growth, both domestically and internationally. Revenue increased due to growth in transactions and volume,partially offset by a decrease in equity earnings of $38 million.

Net income attributable to First Data Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2016 improved to $420 million from a net loss of $1.5 billion during the same period in 2015. The improvement in net income is attributable to lower rates, changesdebt extinguishment charges of $1.0 billion, lower interest expense of $469 million, lower depreciation and amortization expense of $73 million, a $66 million decrease in mix,stock-based compensation expense, and attrition. As expected,a $29 million gain on the Visa Europe share sale, partially offset by a $34 million loss on divestiture of an international business unit. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2016 also benefited by $100 million related to the termination of our management agreement with KKR, as well as overall expense savings as part of our announced expense management initiatives and improved operating results.

Segment Results


We operate three reportable segments: Global Business Solutions (GBS), Global Financial Solutions (GFS), and Network & Security Solutions (NSS). Our segments are designed to establish global lines of businesses that work seamlessly with our teams in our regions of North America (United States and Canada), EMEA (Europe, Middle East, and Africa), LATAM (Latin America and Caribbean region), and APAC (Asia Pacific).

The business segment measurements provided to and evaluated by the chief operating decision maker are computed in accordance with the principles listed below:

The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies.

Intersegment revenues are eliminated in the segment that sells directly to the end market.

Segment revenue excludes reimbursable debit network fees, postage, and other revenue.

Segment EBITDA includes equity earnings in affiliates and excludes depreciation and amortization expense, net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, other operating expenses, and other income (expense). Additionally, segment EBITDA is adjusted for items similar to certain of those used in calculating our compliance with debt covenants. The additional items that are adjusted to determine segment EBITDA:

stock-based compensation and related expenses are excluded; and
Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (KKR) related items including annual sponsor and other fees for management, consulting, financial, contract termination, and other advisory services are excluded. Upon our public offering on October 15, 2015, we continueare no longer required to experience decreases in check processing revenue primarily as a result of lower overall check volumes duepay management fees to a shift toward electronic payments. During 2014, foreign currency exchange rate movements negativelyKKR.


2637





impactedFor significant affiliates, segment revenue and segment EBITDA are reflected based on our proportionate share of the transactionresults of our investments in businesses accounted for under the equity method and processing service feesconsolidated subsidiaries with noncontrolling ownership interests. For other affiliates, we include equity earnings in affiliates, excluding amortization expense, in segment revenue and segment EBITDA. In addition, GBS measures reflect revenue-based commission payments to Independent Sales Organizations (ISOs) and sales channels, which are treated as an expense in the consolidated statements of operations, as contra revenue.

Corporate operations include corporate-wide governance functions such as our executive management team, tax, treasury, internal audit, corporate strategy, and certain accounting, human resources and legal costs related to supporting the corporate function. Costs incurred by Corporate that are attributable to a segment are allocated to the respective segment.

Certain measures exclude the estimated impact of foreign currency changes (constant currency). To present this information, monthly results during the periods presented for entities reporting in currencies other than U.S. dollars are translated into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rates in effect during the corresponding month of the prior fiscal year, rather than the actual average exchange rates in effect during the current fiscal year. Once translated, each month during the periods presented is added together to calculate the constant currency results for the periods presented.
Operating revenues overview

  Year ended December 31, Percent Change Reported Constant Currency Percent Change
(in millions) 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Consolidated revenues $12,052
 $11,584
 $11,451
 4 % 1 % 4% 2%
Adjustments: 

 

 

 

 

    
Non wholly owned entities (64) (80) (74) (20)% 8 % NM
 NM
Independent sales organizations (ISOs) commissions (637) (618) (642) 3 % (4)% NM
 NM
Reimbursable debit network fees, postage, and other (3,923) (3,745) (3,687) 5 % 2 % 5% 2%
Total segment revenues $7,428

$7,141

$7,048
 4 % 1 % 4% 3%
        

 

    
Segment revenues:       

 

    
Global Business Solutions $4,262
 $4,063
 $4,089
 5 % (1)% 5% 2%
Global Financial Solutions 1,623
 1,593
 1,495
 2 % 7 % 3% 10%
Network & Security Solutions 1,543
 1,485
 1,464
 4 % 1 % 4% 1%
NM represents not meaningful

38





Global Business Solutions segment results
The following table displays total segment revenue by region and illustrates, on a percentage basis, the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on revenue growth ratefor the periods presented:
  Year Ended 
 December 31, 2016
 Core Growth (Decline) 
Currency Impact(a)
 
Acquisitions/Dispositions(b)
 
Accounting Change(c)
 Year Ended 
 December 31, 2017
 Percent Change Reported Constant Currency Percent Change
(in millions)        
Revenues:                
North America $3,176
 $(61)
(d) 
$1
 $84
 $62
 $3,262
 3 % 3 %
EMEA 550
 25
(e) 

 
 
 575
 5 % 5 %
LATAM 178
 101
(f) 
(6) 
 
 273
 53 % 56 %
APAC 159
 21
(g) 
3
 (31) 
 152
 (4)% (6)%
Total segment revenue $4,063
 $86
 $(2) $53
 $62
 $4,262
 5 % 5 %

(a)Currency impact is the difference between the current year's actual results and the same year's results converted with the prior year's foreign exchange rate. Constant currency percentage change is a measure of revenue growth before foreign currency impact.
(b)North America revenue was impacted by acquisitions of CardConnect in July 2017 and BluePay in December 2017. The Acquisitions/Dispositions column includes July 2016 to December 2016 and December 2016 revenues for CardConnect and BluePay, respectively, and current period growth for CardConnect and BluePay is included in Core Growth (Decline). APAC balance represents revenue associated with the disposition of the Australian ATM business in September 2016. See note 12 "Acquisitions and Dispositions" to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.
(c)Effective January 2017, we changed our accounting for Clover hardware sales to recognize revenue upon shipment as opposed to deferring such revenue and recognizing over an established period, typically three years. Previously deferred revenue on hardware shipped in previous years continued to be amortized over the established period. See Deferred Revenue in note 1 "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.
(d)North America revenue decrease was driven by a decline in our bank alliances. The decline was partially attributed to $13 million of fee increases which occurred in 2016 which did not reoccur in 2017.
(e)EMEA revenue increased due to growth in United Kingdom of $9 million, related to growth in sales volumes, and in Germany and Austria of $9 million, related to growth in terminal hardware sales.
(f)LATAM revenue increased due to growth in Brazil of $62 million, related to increases in our active customer base and sales volumes, and growth in Argentina of $35 million.
(g)APAC revenue increased due to growth in India.
  Year Ended 
 December 31, 2015
 Core Growth (Decline) 
Currency Impact(a)
 
Acquisitions/ Dispositions(b)
 Accounting Change Year Ended 
 December 31, 2016
 Percent Change Reported Constant Currency Percent Change
(in millions)        
Revenues:                
North America $3,204
 $(29)(c)$1
 $
 $
 $3,176
 (1)% (1)%
EMEA 541
 31
(d)(22) 
 
 550
 2 % 6 %
LATAM 164
 71
(e)(57) 
 
 178
 9 % 44 %
APAC 180
 (5)(f)(4) (12) 
 159
 (12)% (10)%
Total segment revenue $4,089
 $68
 $(82) $(12) $
 $4,063
 (1)% 2 %

(a)Currency impact is the difference between the current year's actual results and the same year's results converted with the prior year's foreign exchange rate. Constant currency percentage change is a measure of revenue growth before foreign currency impact.
(b)APAC revenue adjusted to exclude revenue associated with the disposition of the Australian ATM business in September 2016. See note 12 "Acquisitions and Dispositions" to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.
(c)North America revenue decrease was driven by lower hardware sales of $50 million, partially offset by an increase of $25 million in software sales as a result of growth in our merchant suite of products, including continued growth of our Transarmor Solution. Processing revenue remained flat as transaction growth of 7% was offset by lower blended yield.
(d)EMEA constant currency revenue increased as a result of volume growth and an approximate $10 million benefit from changes in interchange pricing during the first quarter of 2016.
(e)Revenue increase in our LATAM region was benefited by growth in Brazil and Argentina of $35 million and $30 million, respectively during 2016. Remaining growth in LATAM was driven by growth in Uruguay, Mexico and the Caribbean.
(f)Revenue in the APAC region was impacted by a decrease in ATM fees for the year ended December 31, 2016.










39





The following table displays total merchant transactions for the periods presented:
  Year ended December 31, Percent Change
(in millions) 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Key indicators:  
  
  
 

 

North America merchant transactions(a)
 49,248
 46,372
 43,362
 6% 7%
International merchant transactions(b)
 9,760
 8,246
 6,826
 18% 21%
(a)North American merchant transactions include acquired Visa and MasterCard credit and signature debit, American Express and Discover, PIN-debit, electronic benefits transactions, processed-only and gateway customer transactions at the Point of Sale (POS). North American merchant transactions reflect 100% of alliance transactions.
(b)International transactions include Visa, MasterCard, and other payment network merchant acquiring transactions for clients outside the U.S. and Canada. Transactions include credit, signature debit, PIN-debit POS, POS gateway, and Automated Teller Machine (ATM) transactions.

North America transaction growth in 2017 compared to 2016 was driven by continued growth in consumer electronic payments spending. International transaction growth in 2017 compared to 2016 was driven by a 12% increase in EMEA, 28% increase in APAC, and a 47% increase in LATAM.

North America transaction growth in 2016 compared to 2015 was driven by growth in our alliances. International transaction growth in 2017 compared to 2016 was driven by a 14% increase in EMEA, 29% increase in APAC, and a 50% increase in LATAM.
Global Financial Solutions segment results
The following table displays total revenue by segment region and illustrates, on a percentage basis, the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on revenue growth.
  Year Ended 
 December 31, 2016
 Core Growth (Decline) 
Currency Impact(a)
 
Dispositions(b)
 Year Ended 
 December 31, 2017
 Percent Change Reported Constant Currency Percent Change
(in millions)       
Revenues:              
North America $956
 $(7)
(c) 
$
 $
 $949
 (1)% (1)%
EMEA 433
 30
(d) 
(13) (6) 444
 3 % 6 %
LATAM 122
 13
(e) 
(3) 
 132
 9 % 12 %
APAC 82
 13
(f) 
3
 
 98
 19 % 16 %
Total segment revenue $1,593
 $49
 $(13) $(6) $1,623
 2 % 3 %
(a)Currency impact is the difference between the current year's actual results and the same year's results converted with the prior year's foreign exchange rate. Constant currency percentage change is a measure of revenue growth before foreign currency impact.
(b)Business disposition of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia (i.e. the Baltics) in September 2017. See note 12 "Acquisitions and Dispositions" to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.
(c)North America revenue was driven by growth in account processing, offset by $20 million plastics revenue decline and a prior year one-time termination fee of $7 million.
(d)EMEA revenue increase was driven by $24 million of new business and existing client growth in the United Kingdom and $12 million of existing client growth in the Middle East & Africa, partially offset by attrition and lower volumes in the region.
(e)LATAM revenue increase was driven by $13 million of existing client growth in Argentina and $6 million of new business in Colombia, partially offset by a year over year decrease in license resolutions fees.
(f)APAC revenue increase was driven by professional services in Australia and Singapore of $6 million and $5 million respectively, as well as internal growth in Australia.


40





  Year Ended 
 December 31, 2015
 Core Growth (Decline) 
Currency Impact(a)
 Dispositions Year Ended 
 December 31, 2016
 Percent Change Reported Constant Currency Percent Change
(in millions)       
Revenues:              
North America $883
 $73
(b) 
$
 $
 $956
 8 % 8%
EMEA 435
 29
(c) 
(31) 
 433
  % 7%
LATAM 102
 43
(d) 
(23) 
 122
 20 % 42%
APAC 75
 8
(e) 
(1) 
 82
 9 % 10%
Total segment revenue $1,495
 $153
 $(55) $
 $1,593
 7 % 10%
(a) Currency impact is the difference between the current year's actual results and the same year's results converted with the prior year's foreign exchange rate. Constant currency percentage change is a measure of revenue growth before foreign currency impact.
(b)North America revenue increase was driven by growth in our print business and our credit and retail card processing business. Our print business grew by $38 million principally due to a new enterprise win from an existing customer. Credit and retail processing grew by $44 million from an increase in card accounts on file split evenly between growth in existing customers and new business. In addition, our North America credit and retail processing business benefited by $7 million from a termination fee, principally in the fourth quarter.
(c)EMEA constant currency revenue increase was driven by new and existing business growth and professional services growth of $28 million in the United Kingdom and existing business growth of $14 million in the Middle East and Africa. Growth in professional services was partially offset by price compression in Greece. Greece price compression was driven by renewal of one large client in 2015.
(d)LATAM constant currency revenue increase was primarily driven by strong growth in Argentina of $20 million, which benefited by volume growth and inflation, an increase in VisionPLUS licensing revenues of $17 million mostly due to license fee resolutions, and an increase in Colombia of $6 million from a new processing deal. The remaining $4 million growth came from our Caribbean business due to higher processing and professional services revenue.
(e)APAC constant currency revenue increase was driven by professional services and a new processing client in Australia.

The following table displays total card accounts for the periods presented:
  Year ended December 31, Percent Change
(in millions) 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Key indicators:  
  
  
  
  
North America card accounts on file(a)
 906
 855
 813
 6% 5%
International card accounts on file(b)
 170
 151
 135
 13% 12%
(a)North America card accounts on file reflect the total number of bankcard credit and retail credit accounts as of the end of the periods presented.
(b)International card accounts on file reflect total bankcard and retail accounts outside the United States and Canada as of the end of the periods presented. 2015 International card accounts on file reflect an updated card account total.

North America card accounts on file increased in 2017 compared to the same period in 2013 by approximately 1 percentage point.2016 from growth in existing clients.
International accounts on file increased in 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 due to new business and growth of existing clients throughout all of our international regions.

Revenue remained flatNorth America card accounts on file increased in 20132016 compared to 2012 as increases2015 from growth in merchant related services revenue were offset by decreases in card services and check services. The net increases in merchant related services revenue resulted from increases in both domestic and international merchant transactions and dollar volumes in additionexisting clients. International accounts on file increased 2016 compared to 2015 due to new sales, pricing increases,portfolios of existing clients throughout all of our international regions.

41





Network & Security Solutions segment results
The following table displays total revenue by product. Our Network & Security Solutions segment is comprised of more than 95% domestic businesses with no material foreign exchange impact on reported results.
  Year Ended 
 December 31, 2016
 Core Growth (Decline) 
Dispositions(a)
 Year Ended 
 December 31, 2017
 Percent Change
(in millions)   
Revenues:          
EFT Network $491
 $(4)(b)$
 $487
 (1)%
Security and Fraud 434
 15
(c)
 449
 3 %
Stored Value Network 358
 47
(d)
 405
 13 %
Other 202
 7
(e)(7) 202
  %
Total segment revenue $1,485
 $65
 $(7) $1,543
 4 %
(a)Other revenue adjusted to exclude net revenue associated with business that was contributed to our digital banking joint venture with Live Oak on October 2, 2017 offset by our 50% of the joint ventures revenue. See note 12 "Acquisitions and Dispositions" to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.
(b)EFT Network revenue decreased due to increased transaction growth of $20 million offset by increased client incentives.
(c)Security and Fraud revenue increase was driven by growth in our Security and Fraud product categories, offset by declines within the Telecheck business of $14 million.
(d)Stored Value Network revenue increased due to higher rate and volume of $16 million and $24 million, respectively, and a $7 million benefit associated with a contract amendment.
(e)Growth was driven by our government business.

  Year Ended 
 December 31, 2015
 Core Growth (Decline) Dispositions Year Ended 
 December 31, 2016
 Percent Change
(in millions)     
Revenues:          
EFT Network $491
 $
(a)$
 $491
  %
Security and Fraud 412
 22
(b)
 434
 5 %
Stored Value Network 359
 (1)(c)
 358
  %
Other 202
 
 
 202
  %
Total segment revenue $1,464
 $21
 $
 $1,485
 1 %
(a)EFT Network revenue was relatively flat as STAR growth was offset by the impact of a long-term debit processing contract renewal which negatively impacted segment revenue by $14 million.
(b)Security and Fraud revenue increased due to growth from our suite of Security and Fraud products, partially offset by revenue declines within our TeleCheck business of $21 million.
(c)Stored Value Network revenue was flat driven by a change in contract terms for one client in the prior year for $10 million offset by increased volumes.

The following table displays total network routing incentives. These increases were offset by decreases resulting fromtransactions for the impact of merchant mix on transactions and dollar volumes,periods presented:
  Year ended December 31, Percent Change
(in millions) 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Key indicators:          
Network transactions (EFT Network and Stored Value) (a)
 22,114
 20,258
 18,918
 9% 7%
(a)
Network transactions include the U.S. debit issuer processing transactions, STAR Network issuer transactions, and closed loop and open loop POS transactions.

Network transaction growth for the effects of shifts in pricing mix, merchant attrition, and price compression. The decreases in card services revenue resulted primarily from net lost business both domestically and internationally. We experienced decreases in check processing revenue as a result of lower overall check volumes and merchant attrition. The foreign currency exchange rate movements did not materially impact the transaction and processing service fees revenue growth rate for 2013year ended 2017 compared to 2012.
Product salesthe same periods in 2016 and other revenue increased during 20142016 compared to 2013 due to higher equipment sales and revenue streams with lower variable expenses such as portfolio growththe same periods in the leasing business, including interest income and fees on terminal leases, and the $12 million sale of a merchant portfolio in Poland in the fourth quarter for 2014. During 2014, we recognized $5 million for contract settlements and waivers. The foreign currency exchange rate movements negatively impacted the product sales and other growth rate for 2014 compared to 2013 by approximately 3 percentage points.

Revenue decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 due to a decline in domestic terminal sales, including lower bulk sales, a decrease in international software license sales and foreign currency exchange rates partially offset2015 was driven by growth in professional services revenue resulting from new projects. Foreign currency exchange rate movements negatively impacted the product sales and other growth rate in 2013 compared to 2012 by approximately 2 percentage points.all network transaction categories.

Reimbursable debit network fees, postage, and other revenue

Revenue increased in 2014 and 20132017 compared to 2016 due to transaction and volume growth related to debit network fees related to both new and existing customersof $217 million partially offset by changes in regulated financial institution mix.

Operating expenses overview
  Year ended December 31, Percent Change
(in millions) 2014 2013 2012 2014 vs. 2013 2013 vs. 2012
Cost of services (exclusive of items shown below) $2,741.3
 $2,808.8
 $2,863.5
  (2)%  (2)%
Cost of products sold 337.2
 334.0
 336.3
  1 %  (1)%
Selling, general, and administrative 1,961.8
 1,888.8
 1,825.4
  4 %  3 %
Reimbursable debit network fees, postage, and other 3,603.5
 3,507.4
 3,361.5
  3 %  4 %
Depreciation and amortization 1,055.5
 1,091.3
 1,191.6
  (3)%  (8)%
Other operating expenses, net 13.2
 56.0
 28.2
  (76)%  99 %
Total Expenses $9,712.5
 $9,686.3
 $9,606.5
   %  1 %
postage associated with output services.

Cost of services expense decreasedRevenue increased in 20142016 compared to 2013 due to our focus on operational and processing efficiencies including lower headcount and changes in compensation programs, a tax recovery in Australia, and lower bonus expense partially offset by product development initiatives and a $22 million reserve for uncollectible receivables in Latin America.

Cost of services expense decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 mostly due to cost reduction initiatives offset by increases in product development costs.

27





Selling, general, and administrative
  Year ended December 31, Percent Change
(in millions) 2014 2013 2012 2014 vs. 2013 2013 vs. 2012
Salaries, wages, bonus, and other $740.9
 $741.2

$700.2
 
 % 
6 %
Outside professional services 721.8
 684.2
 674.0
 
5 % 
2 %
Commissions 146.8
 136.4
 151.5
 
8 % 
(10)%
Other 352.3
 327.0
 299.7
 
8 % 
9 %
Selling, general, and administrative expense $1,961.8
 $1,888.8
 $1,825.4
 
4 % 
3 %

Selling, general, and administrative expense increased in 2014 compared to 2013 largely due to growth in payments to independent sales organizations resulting from increased transactions and volumes, higher legal fees, and expenses incurred throughout 2014 related to the transition of several corporate functions from Denver to Atlanta. Other, which includes advertising and promotional expenses, business travel and entertainment expenses, and other selling expenses, increased mainly due to increased marketing expenditures related to new products. Commissions expense increased due to increased sales.

Selling, general, and administrative expense increased in 2013 compared to 2012 largely due to increased sales staff, $8 million in litigation expense, and $3 million additional non-payroll taxes, partially offset by reduced commissions expense due to lower payouts related to lower sales volume.
Reimbursable debit network fees, postage, and other expense increased in 2014 and 20132015 due to transaction and volume growth related to debit network fees of $38 million and growth in print services.

42





Operating expenses overview
  Year ended December 31, Percent Change Reported Constant Currency Percent Change
(in millions) 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Cost of services (exclusive of items shown below) $2,763
 $2,855
 $2,871
 (3)%
(1)% (3)% 1 %
Cost of products sold 359
 337
 356
 7 %
(5)% 7 % (3)%
Selling, general, and administrative 2,178
 2,035
 2,292
 7 %
(11)% 7 % (10)%
Depreciation and amortization 972
 949
 1,022
 2 %
(7)% 2 % (6)%
Other operating expenses 143
 61
 53
 134 %
15 % 134 % 17 %
Total expenses (excluding reimbursable items) 6,415
 6,237
 6,594
 3 % (5)% 3 % (4)%
Reimbursable debit network fees, postage, and other 3,923
 3,745
 3,687
 5 %
2 % 5 % 2 %
Total expenses $10,338
 $9,982
 $10,281
 4 % (3)% 4 % (2)%

Cost of services
  Year ended December 31, Percent Change Reported Constant Currency Percent Change
(in millions) 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Salaries, wages, and bonus $1,437
(a)$1,474
 $1,478
 (2)%  %    
Stock-based compensation 72
(b)112
(d)130
 (35)% (14)%    
Outside professional services 258
(c)264
(e)250
 (2)% 6 %    
Software, telecommunication infrastructure, and repairs 387
(c)396
(e)380
 (2)% 4 %    
Other 609

609
(f)633
  % (4)%    
Cost of services expense $2,763
 $2,855
 $2,871
 (3)% (1)% (3)% 1%
(a)Expense decreased in 2017 compared to 2016 due to a $37 million decline in salaries and wages related to productivity improvements and enhancements.
(b)The decline in stock based compensation of $40 million resulted from a $34 million decrease relating to reallocation from cost of services to selling, general and administrative expenses to better align with our operations, $22 million decline in one-time expense related to our initial public offering in 2015, offset by an increase of $16 million in recurring stock-based compensation incurred over the vesting life of normal service-based stock awards.
(c)Outside professional services and Software, telecommunication, infrastructure and repairs expense decreased by $15 million due to benefits achieved through our cost initiatives.
(d)Stock compensation expense decreased in 2016 compared to 2015 by $18 million as a result of a $78 million one-time expense in 2015 related to our initial public offering, partially offset by an increase of $60 million in recurring stock-based compensation incurred over the vesting life of normal service-based stock awards.
(e)Outside professional services and Software, telecommunication, infrastructure and repairs expense increased by $30 million as we continue to invest in our core operating businesses.
(f)Other expenses declined as 2015 was negatively impacted by two client-related matters totaling $24 million. In addition, included within other expenses is an increase of approximately $25 million in merchant credit losses, partially offset by a decline of warranty expense within NSS of $10 million. Merchant credits losses increased due to higher fraud rates and charge-backs resulting from a liability shift post EMV. Warranty expense declined driven by lower volumes within our TeleCheck business. The remaining decline in other expense was driven by expense rationalization from our previously announced cost management initiatives.

Cost of products sold

Cost of products sold expense increased in 2017 compared to both new and existing customers, partially offset2016 due to hardware expenses, impacted by changesa $47 million change in regulated financial institution mix.accounting relating to our Clover terminals effective as of January 1, 2017. Cost of products sold decreased in 2016 compared to 2015 due to decline in hardware sales.


43





Selling, general, and administrative
  Year ended December 31, Percent Change Reported Constant Currency Percent Change
(in millions) 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Salaries, wages, bonus, and other $655
 $659
(e)$697
 (1)% (5)%   

Stock-based compensation 173
(a)151
(f)199
 15 % (24)%    
Independent sales organizations (ISOs) commissions 637
 618
(g)642
 3 % (4)%   

Outside professional services 219
(b)182
(h)295
 20 % (38)%   

Commissions 182
(c)137
(e)158
 33 % (13)%   

Other 312
(d)288
(e)301
 8 % (4)%   

Selling, general, and administrative expense $2,178
 $2,035
 $2,292
 7 % (11)% 7% (10)%
(a)Stock based compensation expense increased $22 million. The increase in stock based compensation of $22 million resulted from a $34 million increase relating to reallocation from cost of services to selling, general, and administrative expenses to better align with our operations, $18 million in recurring stock-based compensation incurred over the vesting life of normal service-based stock awards offset by $30 million decline in one-time expense related to our initial public offering in 2015.
(b)Outside Professional services expense increased $37 million due to higher legal and consulting fees.
(c)Commissions increase is attributed to the acquisitions of CardConnect and BluePay.
(d)Other expenses increased due to $15 million increase related to advertising expenses for marketing initiatives in 2017 and $11 million related to the acquisition of CardConnect and BluePay.
(e)Salaries, wages, bonus, and other decrease was driven by Commissions expense decline of $21 million and miscellaneous other expenses decline of $13 million, all driven by expense rationalization from our previously announced cost management initiatives.
(f)Stock based compensation expense declined $48 million. The decline in stock-based compensation resulted from a $124 million decline in one-time expense related to our initial public offering in 2015, partially offset by an increase of $76 million in recurring stock-based compensation incurred over the vesting life of normal service-based stock awards.
(g)Retail ISO commissions declined $24 million due to consolidation of Retail ISOs to Wholesale ISOs via acquisition.
(h)The Outside professional services expense decline was driven by a $100 million decline in KKR related expenses, of which $78 million related to termination of our Management Agreement with KKR during 2015.

Depreciation and amortization
  Year ended December 31, Percent Change
(in millions) 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Depreciation expense $321
 $300
 $290
 7% 3 %
Amortization expense 651

649

732
 % (11)%
Depreciation and amortization $972
 $949
 $1,022
 2% (7)%

Depreciation expense decreasedincreased due to higher capital expenditure investments, primarily relating to equipment under capital lease, over the past several years. Amortization expense increased in 20142017 which was attributed to the CardConnect and 2013BluePay acquisitions, offset partially by reduction in amortization expense on acquisition intangibles. Amortization expense in 2016 decreased due to a decreasereduction in the amortization expense on acquisition of certain intangible assets that are being amortized on an accelerated basis and certain other assets that have become fully amortized, partially offset by amortization of new assets.intangibles.

Other operating expenses net includes restructuring, litigation and regulatory settlements, impairments, and other as applicable to the periods presented.
  Year ended December 31, Percent Change
(in millions) 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Restructuring, net $83
(a)$49
 $53
 70% (8)%
Deal and deal integration costs 27
(b)
 
 NM
 NM
Asset impairment 13
(c)
 
 NM
 NM
Other 20
(c)12
(d)
 65%
NM
Other operating expenses $143
 $61
 $53
 134%
15 %
(a)Other operating expenses increased in 2017 compared to 2016 as restructuring expense increased $34 million due to our ongoing expense management initiative.
(b)Deal and deal integration costs related to costs associated with the acquisitions of CardConnect and BluePay.

44





(c)Asset impairment and other costs increased $21 million due to the resolution of two customer related matters of $10 million, a $6 million loss on a prepaid asset related to an early contract terminated, and a write-down of abandoned technology.
(d)Other increased in 2016 compared to 2015 as we incurred a $10 million loss associated with the cash payout of certain long-term pension obligations and a $5 million loss from the settlement of a client related matter in 2016.

Refer to Note 2 “Restructuring”note 10 “Other Operating Expenses” to our Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for details regarding restructuring charges. In the fourth quarter of 2014, we began an off-shoring initiative to employ lower cost offshore resources that is expected to be complete by 2019 with an incremental cost range between $50 million to $100 million that will mainly be incurred over the next two years.other operating expenses.
Interest income (expense)
  Year ended December 31, Percent Change
(in millions) 2014 2013 2012 2014 vs. 2013 2013 vs. 2012
Interest income $10.6
 $11.1
 $8.8
  (5)%  26 %
Interest expense (1,753.0) (1,880.7) (1,897.8)  (7)%  (1)%
Interest expense, net
  Year ended December 31, Percent Change
(in millions) 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Interest expense, net $(937) $(1,068) $(1,537) (12)% (31)%

Interest expense, net decreased in 2014 compared to 2013 due to lower outstanding debt balances as a result of debt extinguishments, lowerweighted-average interest rates as a result of debt exchangesextinguishments and refinancing as well as lower average outstanding principal balances. Interest expense, net includes fees incurred to modify long-term debt in the amount of $10 million and lower financing fees amortization.$29 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Refer to Note 6note 2 "Borrowings" to our Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Interest expense decreased slightly in 2013 compared to 2012 due to the de-designation of cash flow hedges, which resulted in the reclassification of $115 million of accumulated losses from other comprehensive income (OCI) into interest expense during 2012. This was substantially offset by increased interest expense related to higher interest rates resulting from

Loss on debt modifications and amendments. As of December 31, 2013, there were no amounts carried in OCI related to interest rate swaps. extinguishment
  Year ended December 31, Percent Change
(in millions) 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Loss on debt extinguishment $(80) $(70) $(1,068) 14% (93)%

Refer to Note 5 “Derivative Financial Instruments”note 2 “Borrowings” to our Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.

Loss on debt extinguishment

Loss on debt extinguishment We incurred a $260 million loss on the extinguishment of $2.2 billion of outstanding debt during the third quarter of 2014.

28





Other income (expense)
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions)  2014 2013 2012
Investment gains and (losses) $100.2
 $2.4
 $(7.7)
Derivative financial instruments gains and (losses) 0.3
 (24.4) (91.4)
Divestitures, net 1.6
 (5.4) 
Non-operating foreign currency gains and (losses) 59.1
 (19.5) 4.8
Other income (expense) $161.2

$(46.9) $(94.3)
Investment gains and (losses) Gains in 2014 relate primarily to the sale of our 30% minority interest in EFS which resulted in a pretax gain of $98 million. The net investment losses in 2012 relate primarily to the impairment of a strategic investment.
Derivative financial instruments gains and (losses) The net loss in 2013 was due to fair value adjustments for interest rate swaps and cross currency swaps that are not designated as accounting hedges while the loss in 2012 was primarily driven by fair value adjustments related to interest rate swaps.
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions)  2017 2016 2015
Investment gains $1
 $35
(a)$
Derivatives 
 (5)(b)(17)
Divestitures, net gain (loss) 18
(c)(34) 5
Non-operating foreign currency (loss) gains (1)(d)19
(d)41
Other miscellaneous (loss) income (2) 2
 
Other income $16

$17

$29

(a)Investment gains in 2016 represent the sale of our share in Visa Europe (VE). Additionally in 2016, we sold our 49% minority interest in an international joint venture which resulted in a pretax gain of $7 million.
(b)The losses on derivatives in 2016 and 2015 are driven by fair value adjustments on our nondesignated interest rate contracts. See note 13 "Derivative Financial Instruments" to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information on our derivative contracts.
(c)Divestitures, net gain (loss) in 2017 relates to our online banking business, which we contributed in exchange for a 50% ownership in Apiture, a joint venture, both of these businesses are reported within the NSS segment. The loss in 2016 represents the sale of our Australian ATM business on September 30, 2016. The Australian ATM business was reported as part of GBS. See note 12 "Acquisitions and Dispositions" to our consolidated financial statement in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information on our significant divestitures.
(d)Non-operating foreign currency (loss) gain represents net gains and losses related to currency translations on our intercompany loans in all years as well as gains on euro-denominated debt in 2015. We designated all of our euro-denominated debt as a hedge against our net investment in euro business as of January 1, 2016, which would have eliminated income statement gains of $70 million prior to 2016, if the hedge was in place and fully effective during those periods.
Non-operating foreign currency gains and (losses) Amounts represent net gains and losses related to currency translations on our intercompany loans and euro-denominated debt. The gain during 2014 was driven by the U.S. dollar strengthening against the Euro.

Income taxes
 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
(in millions) 2014 2013 2012  2017 2016 2015 
Income tax expense (benefit) $82.1
 $86.5
 $(224.0) 
Income tax (benefit) expense $(729) $81
 $101
 
Effective income tax rate (45.0)% (14.3)% 29.8%  (78)% 11% (9)% 

The
45





Our global effective tax rates in each year differrate differs from the statutory rates primarily as a result of recognizing tax expense inon income from certain foreign jurisdictions with pretax income while being precluded from recognizingrecording no taxes on certain foreign losses subject to deferred tax benefits on pre-tax lossesvaluation allowances. In 2017, the tax rate was also positively impacted by a $1.3 billion release of valuation allowances in the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions that are subject to valuation allowances. In each year, the negative impact from the valuation allowance wasjurisdiction, partially offset by us not havinga $353 million negative impact of the reduction to recordour net deferred tax expense attributable toassets as a result of the noncontrolling interest portionenactment of pretax income from pass through entities.the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

Following the recognition of significant deferred tax valuation allowances in 2012, we have regularly experienced substantial volatility in our effective tax rate in interim periods and across years. This ishas been due to deferred income tax benefits not being recognized in several jurisdictions, most notably in the United States. During 2017, the valuation allowance in the U.S. jurisdiction was released, creating a large tax rate benefit. This release of the valuation allowance should reduce most of the effective tax rate volatility in future periods.

Pre-tax income (loss) generated and the effective income tax rate in domestic and foreign jurisdictions for the years ended December 2017, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:
  Year ended December 31, 
  2017 2016 2015 
(in millions) Domestic Foreign Total Domestic Foreign Total Domestic Foreign Total 
Pre-tax income (loss) $484
 $451
 $935
 $492
 $249
 $741
 $(1,332) $165
 $(1,167) 
Income tax (benefit) expense (827) 98
 (729) 40
 41
 81
 21
 80
 101
 
Effective income tax rate (171)% 22% (78)% 8% 16% 11% (2)% 48% (9)% 
The significant jurisdictions comprising our foreign income tax expense are Argentina, Brazil, Ireland and the UK.  Effective income tax rates in these significant jurisdictions vary from local statutory rates due to valuation allowances and tax contingencies impacting certain jurisdictions. Given the significance of the pre-tax income (loss) in the U.S. compared to foreign jurisdictions, and the impact of the release of the valuation allowance in the U.S. jurisdiction, we do not believe changes in the amount, mix and timing of pretax earnings in tax payingincome between our foreign jurisdictions can have a significantwill significantly impact on the overall effective tax rate. This interim and full year volatility is likely to continue in future periods until the valuation allowances can be released.results of operations.

SinceFrom 2007 through 2015, we have been and continue to bewere in a net operating loss position in the U.S. federal and combined state jurisdictions. TheseDuring 2016 and 2017, we generated profits in the U.S. jurisdiction, causing significant portions of these net operating losses causedto be utilized. As a result of this improved profitability, expected future performance, and the length of time remaining before the net operating losses will expire, we determined that it was more likely than not that our net deferred tax assets to exceed our net deferred tax liabilities as of December 31, 2014. This net deferred tax asset position, combined within the history of operating losses is significant negative evidence that underU.S. jurisdiction would be realized, and, therefore, we released the more likely than not criteria requires us to record a valuation allowance against our netthese deferred tax assets. Further,Despite the valuation allowance release in the U.S. jurisdiction, we are not ablecontinue to record a benefitmaintain the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets related to tax losses in many separate filing states and certain foreign countries, requiringcountries. It is unlikely that our assessment regarding these valuation allowances will change in the foreseeable future.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (tax reform bill) was signed into law in the U.S. The provisions of the tax reform bill with the most significant implications to us were the reduction of the federal tax rate from 35% to 21%, the creation of a 100% participation exemption for foreign dividends, the enactment of a one-time transition tax on existing foreign earnings, limitations on the deductibility of interest expense, and the establishment of valuation allowances.
Despiteglobal intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) rules. The first three provisions impacted the net operating loss position discussed above, we continue to incur incomeyear-ended December 31, 2017. Because our deferred tax expenseassets exceed our deferred tax liabilities in some states for which we file returns on a separate entity basis and in certain foreign countries. Generally, these foreign income taxes would resultthe U.S., the reduction of the tax rate provided by the tax reform bill resulted in a foreignnegative impact to the tax credit inrate of $194 million. The one-time transition tax coupled with the U.S. However, due to limitations placed by100% participation exemption had an immaterial impact on the U.S. foreign tax credit rules,rate. Because we have also established a partial valuation allowance againsthistorically repatriated our foreign earnings, our cumulative foreign deficits exceed our cumulative foreign profits, causing our one-time taxable inclusion under the transition tax credits.
Our liability for unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $236 million as of December 31, 2014. We anticipate it is reasonably possible that our liability for unrecognized tax benefits may decrease by approximately $122 million within the next twelve months asrules to be zero. As a result of the possible closurefuture participation exemption, we determined that we will not have enough future foreign sourced income to utilize any foreign tax credit carryforwards, and have therefore determined that we will amend our 2010-2016 tax returns to elect to claim foreign tax deductions, rather than foreign tax credits. The deferred tax impact of federalchanging our election from a credit to a deduction was $159 million. This change was assumed when determining the appropriate valuation allowance on our foreign tax audits, potential settlementscredit carryforwards in prior years, and as a result, the decision to amend the returns had an immaterial net tax rate impact.

Overall, we expect the impact of the tax reform bill on future years to be positive. The reduction in the tax rate coupled with certain statesthe participation exemption on foreign dividends will drive the tax rate lower than what would have been expected without passage of the tax reform bill. On the other hand, because of our significant interest expense in the U.S. and our relatively small investment in foreign countries,tangible property, we expect the limitations on interest deductibility and the lapseGILTI provisions to have a negative impact to our tax rate. Overall, we believe that the benefits of the statute of limitations in various statelower tax rate and foreign jurisdictions.the participation exemption will exceed the negative

2946





effect of the limits on interest deductibility and the GILTI provisions, but we are still in the process of evaluating these provisions for their full impact on future periods. Based upon our preliminary analysis, we are projecting our future tax rate to be in the mid-to-high 20% range. The reversal of the valuation allowance has no impact on First Data’s U.S. federal NOL balance, and we continue to estimate that it will be largely shielded from paying U.S. federal cash taxes through the end of 2020.

As permitted by Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, provisional amounts estimated based on information available as of December 31, 2017 are made for the adjustments to deferred tax assets and liabilities, the calculation of the transition tax, and certain valuation allowance assessments. These amounts are subject to change as we obtain information necessary to complete the calculations. We will recognize any changes to the provisional amounts as we refine our estimates and our interpretations of the application of the 2017 Tax Act.

We, or one or more of our subsidiaries, file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2014,2017, we were no longer subject to income tax examination by the U.S. federal jurisdiction for years before 2005. State and local examinations are substantially complete through 2006. Foreign jurisdictions generally remain subject to examination by their respective authorities from 20082007 forward, none of which are considered major jurisdictions. Refer to Note 15note 8 "Income Taxes" to our Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this formForm 10-K for additional information.
Equity earnings in affiliates
 Year ended December 31, Percent Change Year ended December 31, Percent Change
(in millions) 2014 2013 2012 2014 vs. 2013 2013 vs. 2012 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Equity earnings in affiliates $219.6
 $188.3
 $158.2
 17% 19% $222
 $260
 $239
 (15)% 9%

Equity earnings in affiliates relate to the earnings of our merchant alliance partnerships and decreased in 2017 compared to 2016 due to a decline in the results of our North American joint ventures driven by significant decline in leadflow.

Equity earnings in affiliates relate to the earnings of our merchant alliance partnerships and increased in 2014 and 2013 mostly2016 compared to 2015 due to higher volumesrevenue growth within our Wells Fargo Merchant Services joint venture and pricing initiatives as well as a decrease in amortization. The salelower amortization expense of EFS in the second quarter of 2014 did not significantly impact these earnings.$14 million.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest
 Year ended December 31, Percent Change Year ended December 31, Percent Change
(in millions) 2014 2013 2012 2014 vs. 2013 2013 vs. 2012 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest $193.3
 $177.0
 $173.6
 9% 2% $199
 $240
 $213
 (17)% 13%
Most of the net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest relates to our consolidated merchant alliances.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest increasedrelates to the interest of our merchants in 2014our consolidated merchant alliances and decreased in 2017 compared to 20132016 due to organic growth, new revenue, and lower credit losses from our consolidated alliances.
Income increaseda decline in 2013 compared to 2012 due most significantly to increased profit by one of our merchant alliances driven by increased volumes and network routing incentives.
Segment results We classify our businesses into three segments: Merchant Solutions, Financial Services, and International. All Other and Corporate is not discussed separately as its results that had a significant impact on operating results are discussed in the consolidated results discussion above.
The business segment measurements provided to and evaluated by the chief operating decision maker are computed in accordance with the principles listed below.
The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies.
Segment revenue includes equity earnings in affiliates (excluding amortization expense) and intersegment revenue. Merchant Solutions segment revenue does not include equity earnings because it is reported using proportionate consolidation as described below.
Segment revenue excludes reimbursable debit network fees, postage, and other revenue.
Segment EBITDA includes equity earnings in affiliates and excludes depreciation and amortization expense, net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, other operating expenses, and other income (expense). Merchant Solutions segment EBITDA does not include equity earnings because it is reported using proportionate consolidation as described below. Additionally, segment EBITDA is adjusted for items similar to certain of those used in calculating our compliance with debt covenants. The additional items that are adjusted to determine segment EBITDA are:
stock based compensation and related expense is excluded;

30





official check and money order businesses’ EBITDA are excluded as these are winding down;
certain costs directly associated with the termination of the Chase Paymentech Solutions alliance and expenses related to the conversion of certain Banc of America Merchant Services, LLC (BAMS) alliance merchant clients onto our platforms (excludes costs accrued in purchase accounting). Effective October 1, 2011, we and Bank of America N.A. (the Bank) jointly decided to have us operate the Bank’s legacy settlement platform. Transition costs associated with the revised strategy are also excluded from segment EBITDA;
debt issuance costs are excluded and represent costs associated with issuing debt and modifying our debt structure; and
KKR related items including annual sponsor and other fees for management, consulting, financial, and other advisory services are excluded.
Merchant Solutions segment revenue and EBITDA are reflected based on our proportionate share of the results of its investments in businesses accounted for under the equity method and consolidated subsidiaries with noncontrolling ownership interests. In addition, Merchant Solutions segment measures reflect commission payments to certain independent sales organizations (ISOs), which are treated as an expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, as contra revenue to be consistent with revenue share arrangements with other ISO’s that are recorded as contra revenue.
Corporate operations include administrative and shared service functions such as the executive group, legal, tax, treasury, internal audit, accounting, human resources, information technology, and procurement. Costs incurred by Corporate that are directly attributable to a segment are allocated to the respective segment. Administrative, shared service, and certain information technology costs are retained by Corporate. 
Merchant Solutions segment results
  Year ended December 31, Percent Change
(in millions) 2014 2013 2012 2014 vs. 2013 2013 vs. 2012
Revenues:  
  
  
   
   
Transaction and processing service fees $3,253.5
 $3,255.2
 $3,198.8
   %  2 %
Product sales and other 414.3
 384.2
 404.0
  8 %  (5)%
Segment revenue $3,667.8
 $3,639.4
 $3,602.8
  1 %  1 %
Segment EBITDA $1,664.6
 $1,629.8
 $1,594.8
  2 %  2 %
Segment margin 45% 45% 44%  
  100 bps
             
Key indicators:  
  
  
   
   
Domestic merchant transactions (a) 41,251.3
 40,266.2
 38,644.2
  2 %  4 %
(a)Domestic merchant transactions include acquired VISA and MasterCard credit and signature debit, American Express and Discover, PIN-debit, electronic benefits transactions, processed-only, and gateway customer transactions at the POS. Domestic merchant transactions reflect 100% of alliance transactions. Domestic merchant transactions for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 reflect an updated count of transactions.

31





Transaction and processing service fees revenue
  Year ended December 31, Percent Change
(in millions) 2014 2013 2012 2014 vs. 2013 2013 vs. 2012
Acquiring revenue $2,448.1
 $2,416.6
 $2,368.7
  1 %  2 %
Check processing revenue 249.2
 274.3
 306.1
  (9)%  (10)%
Prepaid revenue 321.9
 341.1
 306.5
  (6)%  11 %
Processing fees and other revenue from alliance partners 234.3
 223.2
 217.5
  5 %  3 %
Total transaction and processing service fees revenue $3,253.5
 $3,255.2
 $3,198.8
   %  2 %
Acquiring revenue grew slightly in 2014 and 2013our North American joint ventures mainly due to growthsignificant decline in merchant transactions and dollar volumes, new sales and pricing increases, primarily due to regional merchants and network routing incentives, including $12 million of incentives in 2014. These increases were partially offset by decreases resulting from the impact of merchant mix on transaction and dollar volumes, the effects of shifts in pricing mix, merchant attrition, and price compression.

Transaction growth in 2014 compared to 2013 was driven by our national and ISO merchants, which contributed to lower revenue per transaction. Transaction growth was also negatively impacted by Walmart's shift to a dual processor strategy in the first quarter or 2014.

Transaction growth outpaced revenue growth in 2013 compared to 2012 driven by the factors noted above, particularly merchant mix, pricing mix, and price compression. A greater portion of transaction growth was driven by our national merchants which contributed to lower revenue per transaction. 
Check processing revenue decreased in 2014 compared to 2013 and in 2013 compared to 2012 due to lower overall check volumes from continued check writer and merchant attrition.

Prepaid revenue decreased in 2014 compared to 2013 due to the disposition of a noncore transportation payments joint venture, EFS in the second quarter of 2014, partially offset by higher transaction volumes within the open loop payroll distribution program related to existing customers and new business. The disposition occurred in late May 2014 and had an approximate $30 million negative impact on segment revenue in 2014.leadflow. Refer to Note 3 "Acquisitionsnote 5 “Stockholders' Equity and Dispositions"Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest" to our Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.

Prepaid revenueNet income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest increased in 20132016 compared to 20122015 due to higher transaction volumes within the open loop payroll distribution program related to new and existing business, higher closed loop transaction volumes as well as higher card shipments. In addition, prepaid revenue increased in 2013 versus 2012 by 4 percentage points due tonet volume growth in one of our alliances, resulting from the acquisition of a payment solutions business that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2012.
Processing fees and other revenue from alliance partners increased in 2014 compared to 2013 and 2013 compared to 2012 due to increased volume within our merchant alliances.
Product sales and other revenue increased in 2014 compared to 2013 due to higher equipment sales and portfolio growth in the leasing business, including interest income and fees on terminal leases.Bank of America Merchant Services alliance.

Product sales and other revenue decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to a decline in terminal sales including lower bulk sales.
47





Segment EBITDA Overview
The following table displays Segment EBITDA by segment for the periods indicated:
  Year ended December 31, Percent Change Reported Constant Currency Percent Change
(in millions) 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Segment EBITDA:  
  
  
  
  
    
Global Business Solutions $1,824
 $1,725
 $1,681
 6% 3% 6% 5%
Global Financial Solutions 686
 646
 550
 6% 17% 7% 21%
Network & Security Solutions 729
 666
 639
 9% 4% 9% 4%
Corporate (167) (145) (140) 15% 4% 15% 4%
Total Segment EBITDA $3,072
 $2,892
 $2,730
 6% 6% 7% 8%

MerchantThe following table displays Segment EBITDA margin by segment for the periods indicated:    
  Year ended December 31, Change
  2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Segment EBITDA Margin:  
  
  
    
Global Business Solutions 42.8% 42.5% 41.1% 30
140
Global Financial Solutions 42.3% 40.6% 36.8% 170
380
Network & Security Solutions 47.2% 44.8% 43.6% 240
120
Total Segment EBITDA Margin 41.4% 40.5% 38.7% 90
180

Global Business Solutions

Global Business Solutions Segment EBITDA increased 6%in 20142017 compared to 2013 from2016 primarily driven by the impact of the revenue items noted above. Expenses were flat in 2014 compared to 2013 as a resultpreviously within "Global Business Solutions segment results" above,the acquisition of cost reduction efforts, primarily in operations costs, that were reinvested into product investment costs. The EFS disposition had a negative impact of approximately $15 million on segment EBITDA in 2014.CardConnect and BluePay, along with expense declines driven by expense management initiatives.

MerchantGlobal Business Solutions segmentSegment EBITDA increased 3% in 20132016 compared to 2015 primarily driven by the same period in 2012 as a resultimpact of overall growth from the revenue items noted previously within "Global Business Solutions segment results" above, slightly offsetalong with expense declines driven by increased expenses primarily in provisions for uncollectible receivables recorded inour expense management initiatives. Currency translation negatively impacted segment adjusted EBITDA by approximately $40 million compared to the first and third quarters of 2013 and increased technology and operations costs including product investments.

32prior period.





Global Financial Services segment results
  Year ended December 31, Percent Change
(in millions) 2014 2013 2012 2014 vs. 2013 2013 vs. 2012
Revenues:  
  
  
   
   
Transaction and processing service fees $1,412.6
 $1,320.3
 $1,350.0
  7%  (2)%
Product sales and other 48.9
 48.2
 40.1
  1%  20 %
Segment revenue $1,461.5
 $1,368.5
 $1,390.1
  7%  (2)%
Segment EBITDA $741.3
 $617.9
 $603.1
  20%  2 %
Segment margin 51% 45% 43%  600 bps
  200 bps
             
Key indicators:  
  
  
   
   
Domestic debit issuer transactions (a) 11,697.0
 11,313.9
 12,113.8
  3%  (7)%
Domestic active card accounts on file (average for the period) (b) 164.1
 147.0
 132.4
  12%  11 %
(a)Domestic debit issuer transactions include signature and PIN-debit transactions, STAR, and non-STAR branded.
(b)Domestic active card accounts on file reflect the average number of bankcard and retail accounts that had a balance or any monetary posting or authorization activity during the periods presented.
Transaction and processing service fees revenue
  Year ended December 31, Percent Change
(in millions) 2014 2013 2012 2014. vs 2013 2013 vs. 2012
Credit card, retail card, and debit processing $955.0
 $887.0
 $911.5
  8 %  (3)%
Output services 268.6
 243.7
 229.8
  10 %  6 %
Other revenue 189.0
 189.6
 208.7
   %  (9)%
Total transaction and processing service fees revenue $1,412.6
 $1,320.3
 $1,350.0
  7 %  (2)%
Solutions

Credit card, retail card, and debit processing revenue increased in 2014 compared to 2013. Growth in credit card and retail card processing revenue outpaced debit processing revenue growth in 2014 compared to 2013. Credit card and retail card processing revenue increased due to net new business and growth from existing customers, partially offset by price compression on contract renewals and other net pricing incentives. Domestic active card accounts on file increased in 2014 versus 2013 primarily from net new account conversions and growth from existing customers. Debit processing revenue increased in 2014 compared to 2013 due to internal growth and a new transaction routing program that was introduced in the first quarter of 2014, partially offset by net lost and disposed business and price compression on contract renewals.

Credit card, retail card, and debit processing revenue decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 as decreases in debit processing revenue offset growth in credit card and retail card processing revenue. Credit card and retail card processing revenue increased due primarily to growth from existing customers and net new business, partially offset by price compression on contract renewals as well as volume based pricing incentives. Domestic active card accounts on file increased in 2013 versus 2012 primarily from net new account conversions and growth from existing customers. Debit processing revenue decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 due to net lost business, including the loss of a large financial institution that completed its final deconversion in the third quarter of 2012, and price compression on contract renewals and other net pricing incentives.

Debit issuer transactions increased in 2014 compared to 2013 due to growth from existing customers, partially offset by net lost business.

Debit issuer transactions decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 due to net lost business and a decline in gateway transactions, partially offset by growth from existing customers.
Output services revenue increased in 2014 compared to 2013 due to growth in the print business, derived from new and existing customers, and growth in the plastics business, derived from new and existing customers, which includes EMV personalization charges.


33





Output services revenue increased in 2013 compared to 2012 due to net new print and plastics business and growth from existing customers.
Other revenue consists mostly of revenue from remittance processing, information services, online banking and bill payment services as well as voice services.

Other revenue decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 due to decreases in information services, check clearing and voice services driven by lost or disposed business partially offset by increases in remittance processing resulting from net new business. The disposed businesses impacted the other transaction and processing service fee revenue growth rate for 2013 compared to 2012 by approximately 12 percentage points.
Global Financial ServicesSolutions Segment EBITDA increased significantly6% in 20142017 compared to 20132016 due to the impact of the revenue items noted within "Global Financial Solutions segment results" above as well as decreased operatingand lower expenses as a resultdriven by $25 million of operational efficiencies and lower headcount and changesplastics volumes in compensation programs. The decreaseNorth America partially offset by increased investment in operating expenses positivelythe international regions. Currency translation negatively impacted the segment adjusted EBITDA growth rate by 5 percentage points in 2014 whenapproximately $7 million compared to 2013.the prior period.

Global Financial Services segmentSolutions Segment EBITDA increased 17% in 20132016 compared to 20122015 due mostly to decreased operating expenses resultingthe impact of the revenue items noted within "Global Financial Solutions segment results" above, which for the year ended December 31, 2016 includes $27 million from our cost reduction initiativescontract modifications and resolution of license fee disputes. The revenue growth was partially offset by declinesan increase in variable expenses within our North America region. Currency translation negatively impacted segment adjusted EBITDA by approximately $20 million compared to the prior period.

Network & Security Solutions

Network & Security Solutions Segment EBITDA increased 9% in 2017 compared to 2016 due to the revenue items noted above. Thewithin "Network & Security Solutions segment results". In addition to revenue growth, expenses declined due to cost management initiatives in 2017.


48





Network & Security Solutions Segment EBITDA increased 4% in 2016 compared to 2015 due to the revenue items noted within "Network & Security Solutions segment results". In addition to revenue growth, expenses declined for the year ended December 31, 2016 by approximately $6 million due to expenses associated with strategic investments made during the first quarter of 2015.

Corporate

Corporate Segment EBITDA loss increased in 2017 compared to 2016 due to higher legal and incentive compensation related expenses.

Corporate Segment EBITDA loss increased modestly in 2016 compared to 2015 as a decrease in incentive compensation expense was partially offset by growth in technology and infrastructure costs.
Adjusted Net Income

Adjusted net income is a non-GAAP financial measure used by management that provides an alternative view of performance. Adjusted net income excludes amortization of acquisition-related intangibles, stock-based compensation, restructuring costs and other items affecting comparability and, therefore, are not reflective of continuing operating expenses positively impactedperformance. Management believes that the segment EBITDA growth ratepresentation of adjusted net income provides users of our financial statements greater transparency into ongoing results of operations allowing them to better compare our results from period to period. This non-GAAP measure is not in accordance with, or an alternative to, measures prepared in accordance with GAAP and may be different from non-GAAP measures used by 6 percentage pointsother companies. In addition, adjusted net income is not based on any comprehensive set of accounting rules or principles. Non-GAAP measures have limitations in 2013 when comparedthat they do not reflect all of the amounts associated with our results of operations as determined in accordance with GAAP. These measures should only be used to 2012.evaluate our results of operations in conjunction with the corresponding GAAP measures.
International segment resultsThe following table reconciles the reported net income presented in accordance with GAAP to the non-GAAP financial measure of adjusted net income for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
  Year ended December 31, Percent Change
(in millions) 2014 2013 2012 2014 vs. 2013 2013 vs. 2012
Revenues:  
  
  
   
   
Transaction and processing service fees $1,378.5
 $1,320.3
 $1,291.2
  4 %  2 %
Product sales and other 383.6
 367.2
 391.0
  4 %  (6)%
Equity earnings in affiliates 29.7
 31.9
 36.2
  (7)%  (12)%
Segment revenue $1,791.8
 $1,719.4
 $1,718.4
  4 %   %
Segment EBITDA $532.7
 $475.3
 $483.8
  12 %  (2)%
Segment margin 30% 28% 28%  200 bps
  
             
Key indicators:  
  
  
   
   
International transactions (a) 10,222.4
 9,450.0
 8,556.5
  8 %  10 %
International card accounts on file (end of period) (b) 86.0
 78.8
 73.6
  9 %  7 %
  Year ended December 31, Percent Change
(in millions) 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 20162016 vs. 2015
Net income (loss) attributable to First Data Corporation $1,465
 $420
 $(1,481) NM
NM
Adjustments:       
 
Stock-based compensation 245
 263
 329
 (7)%(20)%
Loss on debt extinguishment 80
 70
 1,068
 14 %(93)%
Amortization of acquisition intangibles and deferred financing costs(a)
 403
 422
 579
 (5)%(27)%
(Gain) loss on disposal of businesses (18) 34
 
 NM
NM
Gain on Visa Europe share sale 
 (29) 
 NM
NM
Restructuring 83
 49
 53
 69 %(8)%
Intercompany foreign exchange gain (loss) 1
 (19) 41
 NM
NM
Fees paid on debt modification 10
 29
 
 (66)%NM
Impairment, litigation, and other(b)
 24
 11
 96
 118 %(89)%
Deal and deal integration costs 27
 
 
 NM
NM
Mark-to-market adjustment for derivatives and euro-denominated debt 
 5
 (53) (100)%(109)%
Income tax on above items(c)
 (895) (35) (11) NM
NM
Adjusted net income attributable to First Data Corporation $1,425
 $1,220
 $621
 17 %96 %
NM represents not meaningful
(a)International transactions include VISA, MasterCard,Represents amortization of intangibles established in connection with the 2007 Merger and other payment network merchant acquiringacquisitions we have made since 2007, excluding the percentage of our consolidated amortization of acquisition intangibles related to non-wholly owned consolidated alliances equal to the portion of such alliances owned by our alliance partners. Also, includes amortization related to deferred financing costs of $10 million, $29 million and switching and debit issuer transactions for clients outside the U.S. Transactions include credit, signature debit and PIN-debit POS, POS gateway, and ATM transactions. International transactions$6 million for the yearyears ended December 31, 20132017, 2016, and 2012 reflect an updated count of transactions.2015, respectively.
(b)International card accountsRepresents impairments, non-normal course litigation and regulatory settlements, investments gains (losses), and other, as applicable to the periods presented. The 2015 balance includes a $78 million termination fee paid to KKR upon consummation of our initial public offering.
(c)The tax effect of the adjustments between our GAAP and adjusted results takes into account the tax treatment and related tax rate(s) that apply to each adjustment in the applicable tax jurisdiction(s). Generally, this results in a tax impact at the U.S. effective tax rate for certain adjustments, including the majority of amortization of intangible assets, deferred financing costs, stock compensation, and loss on file include bankcarddebt extinguishment; whereas the tax impact of other adjustments, including restructuring expense, depends on whether the amounts are deductible in the respective tax jurisdictions and retail.the applicable effective tax rate(s) in those jurisdictions. Income tax (expense) benefit also includes the impact of significant discrete tax items impacting Net income (loss) attributable to First Data Corporation. The significant change in income taxes in the current period is primarily driven by a $1,289 million tax benefit associated with the release of valuation allowances in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, partially offset by a $353 million tax expense associated with the impact of tax reform on our deferred tax assets.

Segment revenue in 2014 compared to 2013 was impacted by the items discussed below as well as foreign currency exchange rate movements. Foreign currency exchange rate movements negatively impacted the total segment revenue growth rates in 2014 compared to 2013 by 4 percentage points and negatively impacted growth rates in 2013 compared to 2012 by 2 percentage points.
Transaction and processing service fees revenue includes merchant related services and card services revenue. Merchant related services revenue encompasses merchant acquiring and processing revenue, debit transaction revenue, POS/ATM transaction revenue and fees from switching services. Card services revenue represents monthly managed service fees for issued cards. Merchant related services transaction and processing service fee revenue represented approximately 60% and card services revenue represented approximately 40% of total transaction and processing service fees revenue for the periods presented.


3449





Transaction and processing service fees revenue increased in 2014 compared to 2013Adjusted net income for the year ended December 31, 2017 improved due to volume growthbetter operating performance and lower interest expense. Growth in the card issuing and merchant acquiring businesses. The majority of increases in the merchant acquiring businesses resulted from volume growth in the merchant acquiring alliances,depreciation partially offset by lost processing business in Canada. Revenue inadjusted net income for the card issuing business increased primarily from transaction and volumes growth from existing customers in Argentina, new business from existing clients in the United Kingdom and Greece, as well as inflation in Argentina. In 2014, foreign currency exchange rate movements negatively impacted the transaction and processing service fees revenue growth rate by approximately 3 percentage points compared to the same period in 2013.
Transaction and processing service fees revenue increased in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to volume growth and pricing in the merchant acquiring businesses and card issuing businesses partially offset by lost business in the card issuing businesses. The majority of increases in the merchant acquiring businesses resulted from volume growth in merchant acquiring alliances and direct sales channels primarily in Ireland, United Kingdom, and Poland. Revenue in the card issuing businesses declined primarily due to lost business in Australia and Germany partially offset by volume growth from existing customers in Argentina and the United Kingdom. In 2013, foreign currency exchange rate movements negatively impacted the transaction and processing service fees revenue growth rate by 2 percentage points compared to 2012.
Transaction and processing service fee revenue is driven by accounts on file and transactions. The spread between growth in these two indicators and revenue growth was driven mostly by the mix of transaction types and the impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements. International card accounts on file increased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to new portfolios of existing clients in the United Kingdom, partially offset by the removal of inactive accounts in Canada.year ended December 31, 2017.

Product sales and other revenueAdjusted net income increased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarilyfor the year ended December 31, 2016 improved due to the $12 million sale of a merchant portfolio in Poland in the fourth quarter. In 2014, foreign currency exchange rate movements negatively impacted the growth rate for product sales and other revenue in 2014 compared to 2013 by 8 percentage points.

Product sales and other revenue decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 due to a decrease in software license salesbetter operating performance and lower bulk terminal sales in Canada due to exiting this line of business. In 2013, foreign currency exchange rate movements negatively impacted the growth rate for product salesinterest expense.
Liquidity and other revenue in 2013 compared to 2012 by 3 percentage points.
International Segment EBITDA increased in 2014 compared to 2013 due to the revenue items noted above and a combined $9 million from a tax recovery in Australia and lower bonus expense, partially offset by an unfavorable tax outcome in Argentina. The segment EBITDA growth rate for 2014 compared to 2013 was negatively impacted by 6 percentage points from the impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements.

Segment EBITDA decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 due to the impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements which adversely impacted the segment EBITDA growth rate by 3 percentage points. Segment EBITDA in 2013 benefited from the revenue items noted above as well as decreased operating expenses driven by cost savings initiatives. Segment EBITDA growth in 2013 compared to 2012 was adversely impacted by increased costs related to the expansion of our merchant acquiring business as well as the decrease in software license sales described above.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
 
Our source of liquidity is principally cash generated from operating activities supplemented by our receivable securitization facility and, as necessary, on a short-term basis by borrowings against our senior secured revolving credit facility. We believe our current level of cash and short-term financing capabilities along with future cash flows from operations are sufficient to meet the ongoing needs of the business. The following discussion highlights changes inTo the extent future cash flows exceed the ongoing needs of the business, we may use all or a portion of the excess cash to reduce our debt structure as well asbalances.

Since our cash flow activities and the sources and uses of funds during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012.
Over the past few years,IPO which occurred in October 2015, we completedhave executed various amendments and modifications to certain of our debt agreements in an effort to lower our overall cost of debt and to extend our debt maturitiesmaturities. Prior to 2017, we primarily used excess cash generated by the business and lower interest rates. Details regarding our debt structure are provided in Note 6 "Borrowings"funds raised via the IPO to pay down certain tranches of debt. In 2017, we acquired 100% of CardConnect and BluePay for net consideration of $763 million and $759 million, respectively. For additional detail about these acquisitions, see note 12 "Acquisitions and Dispositions" to our Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

On July 11, 2014, FDH, our direct parent, completedTotal borrowings and net debt

For the issuance of $3.5 billion of its Class B common equity in a private placement. Approximately $2.5 billion ofyear ended December 31, 2017, net debt increased due to acquisitions. The chart below shows the net proceeds fromdebt balances as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. Net debt is a non-GAAP measure defined as total long-term borrowings plus short-term and current portion of long-term borrowings at par value excluding lines of credit used for settlement purposes less cash and cash equivalents. We believe that net debt provides additional insight on the private placement were contributed to uslevel and management of leverage. Net debt is not, and should not be viewed as, a capital contribution and the funds were used to repay approximately $2.2 billion of debt and $214 million in call premiums.substitute for total outstanding GAAP borrowings.
Additionally, on July 18, 2014, we repriced approximately $5.7 billion of 2018 term loans, reducing the interest rate by 50 basis points and saving over $25 million in annual interest expense. The debt pay down from the equity contribution proceeds, combined with the repricing and other actions by us, will lower annual cash interest payments by approximately $228 million.

35
  As of December 31,
(in millions) 2017 2016
Total long-term borrowings $17,927
 $18,131
Total short-term and current portion of long-term borrowings 1,271
 358
Total borrowings 19,198
 18,489
Unamortized discount and unamortized deferred financing costs 126
 156
Total borrowings at par 19,324
 18,645
Less: settlement lines of credit and other arrangements 205
 84
Debt 19,119
 18,561
Less: cash and cash equivalents 498
 385
Net debt $18,621
 $18,176





As of February 27, 2015, our long-term corporate family rating from Moody’s was B3 (positive outlook). The long-term local issuer credit rating from Standard and Poor’s was B (stable). The long-term issuer default rating from Fitch was B (stable). Our current level of debt may limit our ability to get additional funding at our current funding rate beyond our revolving credit facility and receivable securitization facility if needed. Details regarding our debt structure are provided in note 2 "Borrowings" to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Credit ratings
As of February 20, 2018, our long-term corporate family rating from Moody’s was B1 (outlook stable). The long-term local issuer credit rating from Standard and Poor’s was B+ (outlook stable). The long-term issuer default rating from Fitch was B+ (outlook positive). A decrease in our credit ratings could affect our ability to access future financing at current funding rates, which could result in increased interest expense in the future.

Cash and cash equivalents

Investments (other than those included in settlement assets) with original maturities of three months or less (that are readily convertible to cash) are considered to be cash equivalents and are stated at cost, which approximates market value. As of December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, we held $358$498 million and $425$385 million in cash and cash equivalents, respectively.

Included in cash and cash equivalents are amounts held by subsidiaries that are not available to fund operations outside of those subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013,
50





The following table details the cash and cash equivalents held by these subsidiaries totaled $152 million and $116 million, respectively. All other domestic cash balances, to the extent available, are used to fund our short-term liquidity needs.
Cash and cash equivalents also includes amounts held outside of the U.S. as of December 31, 20142017 and 2013 totaling $171 million and $238 million, respectively. Approximately $34 million as of December 31, 2014 is held in Argentina where government imposed restrictions prevent any material repatriations outside of the country. As of December 31, 2014, there was approximately $58 million of cash and cash equivalents held outside of the U.S. that could be used for general corporate purposes. We plan to fund any cash needs in 2015 within the International segment with cash held by the segment, but if necessary, could fund such needs using cash from the U.S., subject to satisfying debt covenant restrictions.2016:

 As of December 31, 2017 As of December 31, 2016
(in millions)Available Unavailable Total Available Unavailable Total
Domestic$50
 $101
(a)$151
 $12
 $102
(a)$114
International227
 120
(b)347
 127
 144
(c)271
Total$277
 $221
 $498
 $139
 $246
 $385
(a)Represents cash held by two of our domestic entities that are not available to fund operations outside of these entities unless the Board of Directors of those respective entities declare a dividend. Also, one of these entities is subject to regulatory capital requirements that must be satisfied before a dividend may be declared.
(b)Consolidated foreign joint ventures held $110 million in cash and cash equivalents until the joint ventures' Board of Directors authorize a distribution. In addition, $10 million of the remaining unavailable cash and cash equivalents in our international subsidiaries is held in countries that have currency controls.
(c)Consolidated foreign joint ventures held $134 million in cash and cash equivalents until the joint ventures' Board of Directors authorize a distribution. In addition, $10 million of the remaining unavailable cash and cash equivalents in our international subsidiaries is held in countries that have currency controls.
Cash flows
  Year ended December 31,
Source/(use) (in millions) 2017 2016 2015
Net cash provided by operating activities $2,047
 $2,111
 $795
Net cash used in investing activities (1,950) (387) (685)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 9
 (1,734) (16)

Cash flows from operating activities

The chart below reconciles the change in operating cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2016 to December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2015 to December 31, 2016:
  Year ended December 31,
Source/(use) (in millions) 2014 2013 2012
Net loss $(264.5) $(692.1) $(527.3)
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities:  
  
  
Depreciation and amortization (including amortization netted against equity earnings in affiliates and revenues) 1,163.3
 1,211.9
 1,330.9
Charges related to other operating expenses and other income 112.2
 102.9
 122.5
Other non-cash and non-operating items, net 2.6
 (8.8) (40.2)
Increase (decrease) in cash, excluding the effects of acquisitions and dispositions, resulting from changes in:  
  
  
Accounts receivable, current and long-term (61.2) 63.3
 (49.8)
Other assets, current and long-term 62.4
 2.8
 260.0
Accounts payable and other liabilities, current and long-term 12.0
 (1.2) (34.6)
Income tax accounts (13.6) (6.1) (294.1)
Net cash provided by operating activities $1,013.2

$672.7

$767.4
  Year ended December 31,
Source/(use) (in millions) 2017 2016
Net cash provided by operating activities, previous period $2,111
 $795
Increases (decreases) in:    
Net income, excluding other operating expenses and other income (a)
 270
 840
Depreciation and amortization 12
 (72)
Working capital (346) 548
Net cash provided by operating activities, end of period $2,047
 $2,111
(a)Excludes loss on debt extinguishment, stock-based compensation expense and other non-cash items.
Cash flows provided by operating activities for the periods presented resulted from normal operating activities and reflect the timing of our working capital requirements.

Our operating cash flow is significantly impacted by our level of debt. Approximately $1.7$0.9 billion, $1.8$1.0 billion, and $1.8 billion in cash interest, includingnet of interest on lines of credit and capital leases,rate swap settlements, was paid during 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 2012,2015, respectively. The decrease in cash interest in 20142017 compared to 20132016 is primarily due to extinguishinglower spreads on term loan debt, lower payments on interest rate derivatives, and lower average outstanding principal balances, partially offset by higher LIBOR rates and a timing shift on bond coupon payments associated with bonds or term loans that were refinanced in the third quarter of 2014.

36both periods.





We estimate that our 2015 quarterly cash interest payments, excluding interestRefer to "Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk" for a detailed discussion on lines of credit and capital leases, will be as follows:
Three months ended
(in millions)
 
Estimated cash interest payments on Long-term Debt
 (Unaudited)
March 31, 2015 $560
June 30, 2015 225
September 30, 2015 570
December 31, 2015 230
  $1,585
Using December 31, 2014 balances for variable rate debt and applicable interest rate swaps,how a 100 basis point increase in the applicable London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) index on an annualized basis would increaseimpact our annual interest expense by approximately $44 million.
Our operating cash flows are impacted by fluctuations in working capital. Cash flows from operating activities in 2014 increased compared to 2013 primarily due to an increase in operating income and a decrease in cash interest payments. Cash flows from operating activities in 2013 decreased compared to 2012 primarily due to timing of various payments. The decrease was partially offset by sources of cash related to lower prefunding of settlement arrangements.
Cash flows from investing activities
  Year ended December 31,
Source/(use) (in millions) 2014 2013 2012
Proceeds from dispositions, net of expenses paid $270.1
 $18.1
 $
Additions to property and equipment (308.0) (194.1) (193.1)
Payments to secure customer service contracts, including outlays for conversion, and capitalized systems development costs (258.5) (184.4) (177.2)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired (30.8) (12.1) (32.9)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment 2.7
 11.8
 8.0
Contributions to equity method investments 
 
 (7.9)
Other investing activities (4.3) 7.6
 6.0
Net cash used in investing activities $(328.8)
$(353.1)
$(397.1)
Acquisitions and dispositions All acquisitions during the periods presented were funded from cash flows from operating activities or from the reinvestment of cash proceeds from the sale of other assets. Purchases of noncontrolling interests are classified as financing activities as noted below. We continue to manage our portfolio of businesses and evaluate the possible divestiture of businesses that do not match our long-term growth objectives. Additionally, we continue to pursue opportunities that strategically fit into the business. We finance acquisitions through a combination of cash flows from operating activities, reinvestment of proceeds from the sale of other assets, borrowings, and equity. We believe that these sources of funds will be adequate to meet our funding requirements as it relates to future acquisitions.
In August 2014, we acquired Gyft, a leading digital platform that enables consumers to buy, send, manage, and redeem gift cards using mobile devices.
In May 29, 2014, we completed the sale of our 30% minority interest in a transportation payments business, EFS, and received $264 million in cash.expense.

In October 2013, we acquired 100% of Perka, a provider of a mobile marketing and consumer loyalty solution.

In December 2012, we acquired 100% of Clover Network, a provider of payment network services.

For a more detailed discussion on acquisitions and dispositions refer to Note 3 "Acquisitions and Dispositions" to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

3751





Capital expenditures (Additions to property and equipment and Payments to secure customer service contracts, including outlaysThe table below represents the working capital change for conversion, and capitalized systems development costs) Capital expenditures in 2014 increasedthe years ended December 31, 2017 compared to 2013 due primarily to technology additions and International ATM and POS additions. Capital expenditures are anticipated to be approximately $550 million to $600 millionthe same period in 2015 and are expected to be funded by cash flows from operations. If, however, cash flows from operating activities are insufficient, we will decrease our discretionary2016:
 Year ended December 31,
Source/(use) (in millions)2017 2016 Change
Accounts receivable, current and long term (a)
$(196) $(81) $(115)
Other assets, current and long term (b)
(36) 61
 (97)
Accounts payable and other liabilities, current and long term (c)
(82) 35
 (117)
Income tax accounts (d)
(16) 1
 (17)
Total working capital change$(330) $16
 $(346)
(a)Decrease due to year-end timing and growth in pre-funding for one of our retail clients. 
(b)Decrease resulted from $49 million related to inventory working capital initiative in 2016, $24 million in prepaid maintenance contacts, and interest rate swaps.
(c)Decrease is attributable to timing of payments.
(d)Decrease is related to income tax payments in 2017.
The table below represents the working capital expenditures or utilize our revolving credit facility.
During the periods presented, net proceeds were receivedchange for the sale of certain assets, including buildings and equipment.years ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015:
 Year ended December 31,
Source/(use) (in millions)2016 2015 Change
Accounts receivable, current and long term (a)
$(81) $(184) $103
Other assets, current and long term (b)
61
 (199) 260
Accounts payable and other liabilities, current and long term (c)
35
 (162) 197
Income tax accounts (d)
1
 13
 (12)
Total working capital change$16
 $(532) $548
(a)Increase is driven by $102 million reclassification related to settlement activities to conform certain domestic and international businesses to our global policies.
(b)Increase due to $96 million from the settlement of cross-currency swaps in 2016 and the timing of working capital requirements and operational improvements impacting inventory levels.
(c)Increase is resulting from $271 million of accelerated interest payments in 2015 related to debt extinguishments offset by the non-recurrence of two supplier signing bonuses received in the prior year.
(d)Decrease related to income tax payments in 2016.
Cash flows from financinginvesting activities
The table below summarizes the changes in investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
  Year ended December 31,
Source/(use) (in millions) 2014 2013 2012
Short-term borrowings, net $11.8
 $(109.6) $99.1
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt 350.0
 
 
Debt modification (payments) proceeds and related financing costs (342.8) (10.3) 17.3
Principal payments on long-term debt (2,261.8) (92.2) (83.3)
Proceeds from sale-leaseback transactions 
 
 13.8
Distributions and dividends paid to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest (265.4) (224.5) (261.9)
Purchase of noncontrolling interest (1.0) (23.7) (25.1)
Capital transactions with parent, net 1,788.2
 (29.8) (8.4)
Net cash used in financing activities $(721.0)
$(490.1)
$(248.5)
 Year ended December 31,
Source/(use) (in millions)2017 2016 Change
Acquisitions (a)
$(1,607) $(6) $(1,601)
Dispositions (b)
88
 38
 50
Capital expenditures(518) (477) (41)
Other (c)
87
 58
 29
Net cash used in investing activities$(1,950) $(387) $(1,563)
Short-term borrowings, net For all three years, the cash activity resulted primarily from net borrowings and paydowns on our international credit lines used principally to prefund settlement activity.
As of December 31, 2014, our senior secured revolving credit facility had commitments from financial institutions to provide $1.0 billion of credit and matures on September 24, 2016. Besides the letters of credit discussed below, we had $10 million outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and no amount outstanding as of December 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2014, $964 million remained available under this facility. Excluding the letters of credit, the maximum amount outstanding against this facility during 2014 was approximately $474 million while the average amount outstanding during 2014 was approximately $107 million.
We utilize our revolving credit facility to fund investing or operating activities when cash flows from operating activities are not sufficient. We believe the capacity under our senior secured revolving credit facility will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs. Our senior secured revolving credit facility can be used for working capital and general corporate purposes.
There are multiple institutions that have commitments under this facility with none representing more than approximately 25% of the remaining capacity.
(a)Decrease is related to acquisition of Acculynk, CardConnect and BluePay during 2017. For additional detail about these acquisitions, see note 12 "Acquisitions and Dispositions" to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.
(b)Increase driven by proceeds from our 2017 Baltics disposition offset by 2016 sale of the Australian ATM business. For additional detail about these dispositions, see note 12 "Acquisitions and Dispositions" to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.
(c)Other represents proceeds from maturity of net investment hedge, proceeds from sale of property and equipment, purchase of equity method investments, and other investing activities.

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt In July 2014, we received $350 million from the issuance of 2018 New Term Loans and proceeds were used for general corporate purposes.
Debt modification (payments) proceeds and related financing costs In conjunction with issuing debt in November 2013, we received $55 million in cash related to accrued interest on the notes which were issued mid-coupon period, which was paid in the first quarter of 2014. Additionally, our debt modifications and amendments completed in 2013 and fully settled in the first quarter of 2014 were accounted for as modifications resulting in only the net effect of the transactions of $35 million, including payment of capitalized fees, being reflected as a use or source of cash excluding certain fees included in the our results of operations. Also, in July 2014, we incurred call premiums and deferred financing costs of $252 million in the third quarter of 2014 associated with certain debt repayments and new borrowings. Refer to Note 6 "Borrowings" to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Principal payments on long-term debt In conjunction with the debt modifications and amendments discussed above, proceeds from the issuance of new notes were used to prepay portions of the principal balances of our senior secured term loans which satisfied the future quarterly principal payments under the senior secured credit facility.

3852





DuringThe table below summarizes the third quarter of 2014, we extinguished $2.2 billionchanges in debt. Refer to Note 6 "Borrowings" to our Consolidated Financial Statementsinvesting activities for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
 Year ended December 31,
Source/(use) (in millions)2016 2015 Change
Acquisitions (a)
$(6) $(89) $83
Dispositions (b)
38
 4
 34
Capital expenditures(477) (602) 125
Other (c)
58
 2
 56
Net cash used in investing activities$(387) $(685) $298
(a)Increase driven by the 2015 acquisitions of Spree, First Pay, and Transaction Wireless Inc. For additional detail about these acquisitions, see note 12 "Acquisitions and Dispositions" to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.
(b)Increase driven by the 2016 sale of the Australian ATM business. For additional detail about these dispositions, see note 12 "Acquisitions and Dispositions" to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.
(c)Increase is driven by 2016 sale of two facilities of $38 million, $27 million of cash received from our investment in Visa Europe. Change was partially offset by $17 million of proceeds from the sale of two facilities in 2015 and an investment in an international joint venture.

Cash flows from financing activities
The table below summarizes the changes in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-Kfinancing activities for additional information on extinguishment of debt. During 2013, we paid notes totaling $16 million. No payments were made in 2012.the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
Payments for capital leases totaled $79 million, $76 million, and $80 million for 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.
 Year ended December 31,
Source/(use) (in millions)2017 2016 Change
Net debt transactions (a)
$382
 $(1,335) $1,717
Proceeds from issuance of common stock50
 23
 27
Other (b)
(423) (422) (1)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities$9
 $(1,734) $1,743
Distributions
(a)We are regularly looking for opportunities to lower our interest expense and extend maturity dates. The increase in net debt transactions is due to the capital needs associated with acquiring BluePay and CardConnect. Details regarding our debt structure are provided in note 2 "Borrowings" to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.
(b)Other represents payment of call premiums and debt issuance cost, payment of taxes related to net settlement of equity awards, distributions and dividends paid to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest and other financing activities.
The table below summarizes the changes in financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
 Year ended December 31,
Source/(use) (in millions)2016 2015 Change
Net debt transactions (a)
$(1,335) $(1,341) $6
Proceeds from issuance of common stock (b)
23
 2,718
 (2,695)
Other (c)
(422) (1,393) 971
Net cash used in financing activities$(1,734) $(16) $(1,718)
(a)We are regularly looking for opportunities to lower our interest expense and extend maturity dates. Details regarding our debt structure are provided in note 2 "Borrowings" to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.
(b)Decrease driven by $2.7 billion of proceeds from our initial public offering in 2015.
(c)Increase due to payments of call premiums and debt fees related to 2015 debt extinguishments.

Free Cash Flow

Free cash flow is a non-GAAP measure defined as cash flow provided by operating activities less capital expenditures, distributions to minority interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest Distributionsother items. We consider free cash flow to be a liquidity measure that provides useful information to management and dividends paidusers of our financial statements about the amount of cash generated by the business which can then be used to, noncontrolling interestsamong other things, reduce outstanding debt and/or strategic acquisitions. Free cash flow is not, and redeemable noncontrolling interest primarily represent distributions of earnings. The activity in all periods presented was primarily the result of distributions associated with the BAMS alliance.should not be viewed as, a substitute for GAAP reported financial information.

Purchase of noncontrolling interest In May 2014, we acquired



53





The table below reconciles cash flow from operations to free cash flow for the less than 1%years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
  Year ended December 31,
Source/(use) (in millions) 2017 2016 Change
Net cash provided by operating activities (a)(c)
 $2,047
 $2,111
 $(64)
Capital expenditures (518) (477) (41)
Distributions and dividends paid to noncontrolling interests, redeemable noncontrolling interest, and other (b)(c)
 (170) (418) 248
Free cash flow $1,359
 $1,216
 $143
(a)
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased due to the items noted previously in the "Cash flows from operating activities" above.
(b)Distributions and dividends paid to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest and other decreased due to $90 million received from the maturity of three net investment hedges in 2017, lower noncontrolling interest earnings, and the timing of distributions totaling $53 million.
(c)The year ended December 31, 2016 balance includes a $102 million reclassification related to settlement activities to conform certain domestic and international businesses to our global policies, which increased "Cash and cash equivalents" and decreased "Accounts receivable, net" in our consolidated balances sheets. Free cash flow excludes the impact of reclassification.

The table below reconciles cash flow from operations to free cash flow for the equity we did not already own of First Data Polska S.A for $1 million. In April 2012, we acquired the remaining approximately 30 percent noncontrolling interest in Omnipay, a provider of cardyears ended December 31, 2016 and electronic payment processing services to merchant acquiring banks, for approximately 37 million euro, of which 19 million euro ($25 million) was paid in April 2012 and the remaining 18 million euro ($24 million) was paid in April 2013.2015, respectively.
Capital transaction with parent, net FDH contributed $2.5 billion to us as a capital contribution and the funds were used to repay certain tranches of our debt. Payments to FDH for cash dividends totaled $686 million, $28 million, and $7 million for 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.
  Year ended December 31,
Source/(use) (in millions) 2016 2015 Change
Net cash provided by operating activities (a)(c)
 $2,111
 $795
 $1,316
Capital expenditures (b)
 (477) (602) 125
Distributions and dividends paid to noncontrolling interests, redeemable noncontrolling interest, and other(c)
 (418) (312) (106)
Free cash flow $1,216
 $(119) $1,335
(a)
Net cash provided by operating activities increased due to the items noted previously in the "Cash flows from operating activities" above.
(b)Change in capital expenditures is due to a $132 million increase in new capital leases and other financing arrangements. Capital leases and other financing arrangements are reflected within "Short-term and current portion of long-term borrowings" and "Long-term borrowings" within the consolidated balance sheets.
(c)The year ended December 31, 2016 balance includes a $102 million reclassification related to settlement activities to conform certain domestic and international businesses to our global policies, which increased "Cash and cash equivalents" and decreased "Accounts receivable, net" in our consolidated balances sheets. Free cash flow excludes the impact of reclassification.
Letters, lines of credit, and other
 Total Available (a) Total Outstanding Total Available (a) Total Outstanding
 As of December 31, As of December 31, As of December 31, As of December 31,
(in millions) 2014 2013 2014 2013 2017 2016 2017 2016
Letters of credit (b) $500.0
 $500.0
 $42.9
 $46.3
 $283
 $250
 $29
 $41
Lines of credit and other (c) 349.2
 264.8
 68.1
 68.7
 546
 489
 205
 84
(a)Total available without giving effect to amounts outstanding.
(b)Up to $500 million of our senior secured revolving credit facility is available for letters of credit. Outstanding letters of credit are held in connection with lease arrangements, bankcard association agreements, and other security agreements. Letters of credit are issued against our revolving credit facility with a $250 million limit in 2017 and 2016.  The maximumlargest amount of letters of credit outstanding during 20142017 was approximately $48$44 million. All letters of credit expire on or prior to December 10, 201515, 2018 with a one-year renewal option.  We expect to renew most of the letters of credit prior to expiration. On December 14, 2017, the Company executed a $33 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility maturing December 20, 2019, available for letters of credit. The interest rate associated with the credit facility was 1.85% for the year ended December 31, 2017. At the end of 2017, we were in the process of transitioning our letters of credit from the revolving credit facility to the senior unsecured credit facility. This resulted in duplicate letters of credit totaling $19 million, which are not included in the total outstanding balance above.
(c)As of December 31, 2014, represents $2832017 we had $531 million of committed lines of credit as well as certain uncommitted lines of credit and other agreements that are available in various currencies to fund settlement and other activity. We cannot use these lines of credit for general corporate purposes. Certain of these arrangements are uncommitted but, as of the dates presented, we had borrowings outstanding against them. Increase due to year-end timing and growth in pre-funding for one of our retail clients.

In the event one or more of the aforementioned lines of credit becomes unavailable, we will utilize our existing cash, cash flows from operating activities, our receivable securitization facility or our senior secured revolving credit facility to meet our liquidity needs. 
Guarantees and covenants All obligations under the senior secured revolving credit facility and our senior secured term loan facilityfacilities are unconditionally guaranteed by most of our existing and future, direct and indirect, wholly owned,wholly-owned, material domestic subsidiaries. The senior secured facilities contain a number of covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness; create liens; enter into sale-leaseback transactions; engage in mergers or consolidations; sell or transfer

54





assets; pay dividends and distributions or repurchase our or our parent company’s capital stock; make investments, loans or advances; prepay certain indebtedness; make certain acquisitions; engage in certain transactions with affiliates; amend material agreements governing certain indebtedness; and change our lines of business. The senior secured facilities also require us to not exceed a maximum senior secured leverage ratio and contain certain customary affirmative covenants and events of default, including a change of control. The senior secured term loan facility also requires mandatory prepayments based on a percentage of excess cash flow generated by us.us if we exceed a certain leverage ratio.

All obligations under the senior secured notes, senior second lien notes, senior notes, and senior subordinated notes are similarly guaranteed in accordance with their terms by each of our domestic subsidiaries that guarantee obligations under our senior secured term loan facility described above. These notes and facilities also contain a number of covenants similar to those described for the senior secured obligations noted above. We are in compliance with all applicable covenants as of December 31, 2014 and anticipate that we will remain in compliance in future periods.

Although all of the above described instruments of indebtedness contain restrictions on our ability to incur additional indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to numerous qualifications and exceptions, including the ability to incur indebtedness in connection with

39





our settlement operations. We believe that the indebtedness that can be incurred under these exceptions as well as additional credit under the existing senior secured revolving credit facility are sufficient to satisfy our intermediate and long-term needs.needs for the foreseeable future. 
Covenant compliance Under the senior secured revolving credit and term loan facilities, certain limitations, restrictions, and defaults could occur if we are not able to satisfy and remain in compliance with specified financial ratios. We have agreed that we will not permit the Consolidated Senior Secured Debt to ConsolidatedCovenant EBITDA Ratio (both as defined in the agreement) Ratio for any 12 month period (last four fiscal quarters) to be greater than 6.006.0 to 1.00.1.0.

The breach of this covenant could result in a default under the senior secured revolving credit facility and the senior secured term loan credit facility and the lenders could elect to declare all amounts borrowed due and payable. Any such acceleration could also result in a default under the indentures for the senior secured notes, senior second lien notes, senior notes, and senior subordinated notes. As of December 31, 2014,2017, we arewere in compliance with thisall applicable covenants, including our sole financial covenant with Consolidated Senior Secured Debt of $11.9$12.3 billion, ConsolidatedCovenant EBITDA of $3.1$3.5 billion and a Ratio of 3.883.49 to 1.00.1.0.

In determining ConsolidatedCovenant EBITDA EBITDA is calculated by reference to net income (loss) from continuing operations plus interest and other financing costs, net, provision for income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. Consolidated EBITDA as defined in the agreements (also referred to as debt covenant EBITDA) is calculated by adjusting EBITDA to exclude unusual items and other adjustmentsas permitted in calculating covenant compliance under the indentures and the credit facilities. We believeCovenant EBITDA is further adjusted to add net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest of certain non wholly owned subsidiaries and exclude other miscellaneous adjustments that are used in calculating covenant compliance under the inclusion of supplementary adjustments to EBITDA applied in presenting Consolidated EBITDA are appropriate to provide additional information to investors to demonstrate our ability to comply with our financing covenants.

The calculation of Consolidated EBITDA underagreements governing our senior secured term loan facility is as follows:credit facilities. Because not all companies use identical calculations, this presentation of Covenant EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.


(in millions)Last twelve months ended December 31, 2014
Net loss attributable to First Data Corporation$(457.8)
Interest expense, net (1)1,742.4
Income tax expense82.1
Depreciation and amortization (2)1,163.3
EBITDA (18)2,530.0


Stock based compensation (3)49.9
Restructuring, net (4)44.0
Non-operating foreign currency (gains) and losses (5)(59.1)
Investment (gains) and losses (6)(100.2)
Derivative financial instruments (gains) and losses (7)(0.3)
Official check and money order EBITDA (8)(1.0)
Cost of alliance conversions and other technology initiatives (9)20.7
KKR related items (10)20.9
Debt issuance costs (11)3.4
Litigation and regulatory settlements (12)0.5
Projected near-term cost savings and revenue enhancements (13)60.4
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest (14)193.3
Equity entities taxes, depreciation and amortization (15)11.5
Loss on debt extinguishment (16)260.1
Other (17)23.2
Consolidated EBITDA (18)$3,057.3
(1)Includes interest expense and interest income.
(2)Includes amortization of initial payments for new contracts which is recorded as a contra-revenue within "Transaction    and processing service fees" of $45 million and amortization related to equity method investments, which is netted within the "Equity earnings in affiliates" line of $63 million.
(3)Stock based compensation recognized as expense.
(4)Restructuring charges in connection with management's alignment of the business with strategic objectives and the departure of executive officers.
(5)Represents net gains and losses related to currency translations on certain intercompany loans and euro-denominated debt.
(6)Reflects investment gains and losses, principally $98 million gain on sale of minority interest, Electronic Funds Source.

4055





The calculation of Covenant EBITDA under our senior secured facilities was as follows:
(in millions)Year Ended 
 December 31, 2017
Net income attributable to First Data Corporation$1,465
Interest expense, net937
Income tax benefit(729)
Depreciation and amortization1,073
EBITDA2,746
Loss on debt extinguishment80
Stock-based compensation245
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest199
Projected near-term cost savings and revenue enhancements (1)111
Restructuring, net83
Non-operating foreign currency (gains) and losses1
Equity entities taxes, depreciation and amortization (2)14
Divestitures, net(18)
Other (3)62
Covenant EBITDA$3,523
(7)Represents fair market value adjustments for cross-currency swaps and interest rate swaps that are not designated as accounting hedges.
(8)Represents an adjustment to exclude the official check and money order businesses from EBITDA due to wind down of these businesses.
(9)Represents costs directly associated with the strategy to have First Data operate Bank of America N.A.'s legacy settlement platform and costs associated with the termination of the Chase Paymentech alliance, both of which are considered business optimization projects, and other technology initiatives.
(10)Represents KKR annual sponsorship fees for management, financial, and other advisory services.
(11)Debt issuance costs represent costs associated with issuing debt and modifying First Data's debt structure.
(12)Represents settlements of litigation or regulatory matters.
(13)(1)Reflects cost savings and revenue enhancements projectedwe expect to be realizedrealize as a result of specific actions as if they were achieved on the first day of the period. Includes cost savings initiatives associated with the business optimization projects and other technology initiatives described in Note 9,initiatives. We may not realize the Banc of America Merchant Services (BAMS) alliance, operations, and technology initiatives, headcount reductions, and other addressable spend reductions.anticipated cost savings pursuant to our anticipated timetable or at all.
(14)Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest in restricted subsidiaries.
(15)(2)Represents FDC’sour proportional share of income taxes, depreciation, and amortization on equity method investments.
(16)Loss incurred due to early extinguishment of debt.
(17)(3)Includes items such as impairmentsdeal and deal integration costs, pension losses, earn-outs, litigation and regulatory settlements, and other as applicable to the period presented.
(18)EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) attributable to First Data Corporation before net interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization. EBITDA is not a recognized term under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and does not purport to be an alternative to net income (loss) attributable to First Data Corporation as a measure of operating performance or to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of liquidity. Additionally, EBITDA is not intended to be a measure of free cash flow available for management’s discretionary use as it does not consider certain cash requirements such as interest payments, tax payments, and debt service requirements. The presentation of EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of First Data's results as reported under GAAP. Management believes EBITDA is helpful in highlighting trends because EBITDA excludes the results of decisions that are outside the control of operating management and can differ significantly from company to company depending on long-term strategic decisions regarding capital structure, the tax jurisdictions in which companies operate and capital investments. Management compensates for the limitations of using non-GAAP financial measures by using them to supplement GAAP results to provide a more complete understanding of the factors and trends affecting the business than GAAP results alone.

Consolidated EBITDA (or debt covenant EBITDA) is defined as EBITDA adjusted to exclude certain non-cash items, non-recurring items that First Data does not expect to continue at the same level in the future and certain items management believes will impact future operating results and adjusted to include near-term cost savings projected to be achieved within twelve months on an annualized basis (see Note 13 above). Consolidated EBITDA is further adjusted to add net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest of certain non-wholly owned subsidiaries and exclude other miscellaneous adjustments that are used in calculating covenant compliance under the agreements governing First Data's senior unsecured debt and/or senior secured credit facilities. We believe that the inclusion of supplementary adjustments to EBITDA is appropriate to provide additional information to investors about items that will impact the calculation of EBITDA that is used to determine covenant compliance under the agreements governing First Data's senior unsecured debt and/or senior secured credit facilities. Since not all companies use identical calculations, this presentation of Consolidated EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.

Off-balance sheet arrangementsOff-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
During 2014, 20132017, 2016, and 2012,2015, we did not engage in any off-balance sheet financing activities other than those included in the “Contractual obligations”Obligations” discussion below and those reflected in Note 9note 14 "Commitments and Contingencies" to our Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. 

Contractual obligationsObligations
 
Our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2014 are2017 were as follows:
  Payments Due by Period
(in millions)  Total 
Less than
 1 year
 1-3 years 3-5 years 
After
 5 years
Borrowings (a) $29,743.0
 $1,657.9
 $4,484.9
 $10,067.8
 $13,532.4
Capital lease obligations (b) 228.6
 83.2
 125.4
 10.4
 9.6
Operating leases 303.0
 60.1
 96.5
 69.2
 77.2
Pension plan contributions (c) 77.3
 13.7
 15.6
 15.6
 32.4
Purchase obligations (d):  
  
  
  
  
Technology and telecommunications (e) 498.1
 265.8
 220.7
 8.7
 2.9
All other (f) 446.2
 213.6
 154.3
 78.3
 
Other long-term liabilities 114.1
 15.9
 92.2
 5.8
 0.2
  $31,410.3
 $2,310.2
 $5,189.6
 $10,255.8
 $13,654.7
  Payments Due by Period
(in millions)  Total 
Less than
 1 year
 1-3 years 3-5 years 
After
 5 years
Borrowings (a) $22,806
 $941
 $3,101
 $5,329
 $13,435
Capital lease obligations (b) 331
 99
 194
 18
 20
Operating leases 346
 63
 104
 74
 105
Purchase obligations (c):  
        
Technology and telecommunications (d) 962
 391
 441
 130
 
All other (e) 50
 29
 12
 5
 4
Total (f) (g) $24,495
 $1,523
 $3,852
 $5,556
 $13,564
(a)Includes future principal and cash interest payments on long-term borrowings through scheduled maturity dates. Includes $4.4$10.0 billion of variable rate debt, (including the impact$4.3 billion of which is subject to fixed interest rate swaps).collar contracts which mitigate exposure to interest rate fluctuations, but are subject to contractual ceilings and floors. Borrowings and interest rate swaps are discussed in Note 6note 2 "Borrowings" and Note 5note 13 "Derivative Financial Instruments", respectively, to our Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Interest payments for the variable rate debt and the associated interest rate swaps were calculated using interest rates as of December 31, 2014.2017.
(b)Represents future payments on existing capital leases, including interest expense, through scheduled expiration dates.

41





(c)Includes future pension plan contributions for all plans in 2015 and future contractual commitments for the United Kingdom (U.K.) plan through 2024 which are subject to change.  The amount of pension plan contributions depends upon various factors that cannot be accurately estimated beyond a one-year time frame other than the U.K. plan.
(d)Many of our contracts contain clauses that allow us to terminate the contract with notice, and with or without a termination penalty. Termination penalties are generally an amount less than the original obligation. Certain contracts also have an automatic renewal clause if we do not provide written notification of our intent to terminate the contract. Obligations under certain contracts are usage-based and are, therefore, estimated in the above amounts. Historically, we have not had any significant defaults of our contractual obligations or incurred significant penalties for termination of our contractual obligations.

56





of our intent to terminate the contract. Obligations under certain contracts are usage-based and are, therefore, estimated in the above amounts. Historically, we have not had any significant defaults of our contractual obligations or incurred significant penalties for termination of our contractual obligations.
(e)(d)Technology and telecommunications represents obligations related to hardware purchases, including purchases of ATMs and terminals, as well as software licenses, hardware and software maintenance and support, technical consulting services, and telecommunications services.
(f)(e)OtherAll other includes obligations related to materials, data, non-technical contract services, facility security, investor management fees, maintenance, and marketing promotions.
(f)We evaluate the need to make contributions to our pension plans after considering the funded status of the pension plans, movements in the discount rates, performance of the plan assets and related tax consequences. Expected contributions to our pension plan have not been included in the table as such amounts are dependent upon the considerations discussed above, and may result in a wide range of amounts. See note 15 "Employee Benefit Plans" to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
(g)As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $270 million of tax contingencies comprised of approximately $259 million reported in long-term income taxes payable in the “Other long-term liabilities” line of our consolidated balance sheets, including approximately $4 million of income tax liabilities for which The Western Union Company (Western Union) is required to indemnify us, and approximately $11 million recorded as an increase of our deferred tax liability. These amounts have been excluded from the table because the settlement period cannot be reasonably estimated. The timing of these payments will ultimately depend on the progress of tax examinations with the various tax authorities.

As of December 31, 2014, we had approximately $262 million of tax contingencies comprised of approximately $238 million reported in long-term income taxes payable in the “Other long-term liabilities” line of the Consolidated Balance Sheets, including approximately $4 million of income tax liabilities for which The Western Union Company (Western Union) is required to indemnify us, and approximately $24 million recorded as an increase of our deferred tax liability. Timing of tax payments is dependent upon various factors which cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. 
Critical Accounting Policies
 
GoodwillGoodwill: Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired, including identifiable intangible assets, and has been allocated to reporting units. Our reporting units are businesses at the operating segment level or one level below the operating segment level for which discrete financial information is prepared and regularly reviewed by management.

We test goodwill annually for impairment, as well as upon an indicator of impairment, usingby first performing a fair value approachqualitative assessment at the reporting unit level. The estimatelevel for all reporting units with the exception of fair value requires various assumptions about a reporting unit’s future financial results and cost of capital. We determine the cost of capital for eachGBS reporting unit giving considerationfor which we begin with a quantitative assessment. The qualitative assessment evaluates company, industry, and macroeconomic events and circumstances to a number of factors including discount rates. All key assumptions and valuations are determined by and are the responsibility of management. Ifdetermine if it is determinedmore likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, we would estimatevalue. If it is determined through the qualitative assessment that it is more likely than not that the fair value of all of the reporting unit’s assets and liabilities and calculate an implied fair value of goodwill, which is the difference between the reporting unit’s fair value and the fair value of all its other assets and liabilities. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than itsthe carrying value, the shortfall is recognized as impairment. The methodology for estimatingwe proceed to a quantitative assessment.

For reporting units tested using a quantitative assessment, fair value varies by asset; however, the most significant assets are intangible assets. We estimate the fair value of the intangible assets using the excess earnings method, royalty savings method, or cost savings method, all of which are a form ofis based on a discounted cash flow analysis. model involving several assumptions. When appropriate we consider assumptions that we believe a hypothetical marketplace participant would use in estimating future cash flows. The key assumptions include segment EBITDA growth and weighted-average cost of capital (discount rate). We determined segment EBITDA growth based on management estimates and business plans. Discount rate assumptions are based on an assessment of the risk inherent in future cash flows of the respective reporting unit as well as cost of debt and equity. If it is determined through quantitative assessment that the fair value is less than the carrying value, the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value, limited to the amount of goodwill recorded and taking into consideration the effect of any tax deductible goodwill, is recorded as an impairment of goodwill.

An impairment charge of a reporting unit’s goodwill could have a material adverse effect on our financial results. ChangesAn impairment charge may be caused by changes in the underlying business and economic conditions, the most relevant of which would be a deterioration in global economic conditions. Deterioration in global economic conditions could cause us to experience a decrease in our segment EBITDA. Furthermore, volatility in the debt markets which impacted our debt yields, could affect these estimates used in the analysis discussed above, which in turn could affect the fair value of the reporting unit. Thus, it is possible for reporting units that record impairments to record additional impairments in the future. All key assumptions and valuations are determined by and are the responsibility of management. The factors used in the impairment analysis are inherently subject to uncertainty. We believe that we have made reasonable estimates and assumptions to determine the fair value of our reporting units, if actual results are not consistent with these estimates and assumptions, goodwill and other intangible assets may be overstated which could trigger an impairment charge.

As of December 31, 2014,2017, the carrying value of goodwill was $17.0$17.7 billion inof which $15.1 billion related to our Consolidated Balance Sheet.GBS reporting unit. As of October 1, 2014,2017, the most recent impairment analysis date, our GBS reporting unit's fair value exceeded its carrying value by 13% and all other reporting units passed their respective qualitative assessments. Examples of events or circumstances that could reasonably be expected to negatively affect the underlying key assumptions and ultimately impact the estimated fair value of eachour reporting unit exceeded its carrying value. Based onunits may include such items as the most recent annual goodwill testfollowing:

Global economic, political, and other conditions may adversely affect trends in consumer, business, and government spending, which may adversely impact the demand for impairment, allour services and our revenue and profitability;
Our ability to anticipate and respond to changing industry trends and the needs and preferences of our four reporting units passedclients and consumers may affect our competitiveness or demand for our products, which may adversely affect our operating results;
Substantial and increasingly intense competition worldwide in the test, though two passed with a marginfinancial services, payments, and technology industries may materially and adversely affect our overall business and operations;

57





Potential changes in the competitive landscape, including disintermediation from other participants in the payments value chain, could harm our business;
The market for our electronic commerce services is evolving and may not continue to develop or grow rapidly enough for us to maintain and increase our profitability;
If we are unable to maintain merchant relationships and alliances, our business may be adversely affected;
Failure to obtain new clients or renew client contracts on favorable terms could adversely affect results of 20% or less.  Based onoperations and financial condition; and
Cost savings initiatives may not produce the most recent annual goodwill testsavings expected and may negatively impact our other initiatives and efforts to grow our business.

See "Risk Factors" in Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K for impairment,further discussions of risks that could affect our Merchant Solutions and International segments passed by 18% and 16%, respectively. business.

An additional analysis was performed for our GBS reporting unit, which sensitized the base discount rate by an additional 50 basis points with all reporting units still passing.points. GBS passed by a margin of 5%. Refer to Notenote 1 "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" to our Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding goodwill.

Intangible assets We capitalize initial payments for new contracts, contract renewals, and conversion costs associated with customer contracts and system development costs. Capitalization of such costs is subject to strict accounting policy criteria and requires management judgment as to the appropriate time to initiate capitalization. Capitalization of initial payments for contracts and conversion costs only occurs when management is satisfied that such costs are recoverable through future operations, contractual minimums, and/or penalties in case of early termination.
We develop software that is used in providing processing services to customers. To a much lesser extent, we also develop software to be sold or licensed to customers. Capitalization of internally developed software, primarily associated with operating platforms, occurs only upon management’s estimation that the likelihood of successful development and implementation reaches a probable level. Currently unforeseen circumstances in software development could require us to implement alternative plans with respect to a particular effort, which could result in the impairment of previously capitalized software development costs.

42





In addition to the internally generated intangible assets discussed above, we also record intangible assets as a result of business combinations and asset acquisitions. In these transactions, we typically acquire and recognize intangible assets such as customer relationships, software, and trade names. In a business combination, each intangible asset is recorded at its fair value. In an asset acquisition, the cost of the acquisition is allocated among the acquired assets, generally by their relative fair values. We generally estimate the fair value of acquired intangible assets using the excess earnings method, royalty savings method, or cost savings method, all of which are a form of a discounted cash flow analysis. These estimates require various assumptions about the future cash flows associated with the assets, appropriate costs of capital, and other inputs such as an appropriate royalty rate. Changes to these estimates would materially impact the value assigned to the assets as well as the amounts subsequently recorded as amortization expense.
We test contract and conversion costs for recoverability on an annual basis by comparing the remaining expected undiscounted cash flows under the contract to the net book value. Any assets that are determined to be unrecoverable are written down to fair value. This analysis requires significant assumptions regarding the future profitability of the customer contract during its remaining term. Additionally, contracts, conversion costs, and all other long lived assets (including customer relationships) are tested for impairment upon an indicator of potential impairment. Such indicators include, but are not limited to: a current period operating or cash flow loss associated with the use of an asset or asset group, combined with a history of such losses and/or a forecast anticipating continued losses; a significant adverse change in the business, legal climate, market price of an asset or manner in which an asset is being used; an accumulation of costs for a project significantly in excess of the amount originally expected; or an expectation that an asset will be sold or otherwise disposed of at a loss.

The carrying value of the First Data trade name is $604 million as of December 31, 2014. Upon consideration of many factors, including the determination that there are no legal, regulatory or contractual provisions that limit the useful life of the First Data trade name, we determined that the First Data trade name had an indefinite useful life. As an indefinite lived asset, the First Data trade name is not amortized but is reviewed annually for impairment until such time as it is determined to have a finite life. For 2014, we elected not to begin the process with a qualitative assessment due to the significance of the First Data trade name to our financial statements. In step one of the impairment test, we estimate the fair value of the First Data trade name using a relief from royalty methodology in which a royalty rate is applied to our revenue streams to be reliant upon the First Data trade name in order to estimate the rent that we save by owning rather than leasing the asset. As of October 1, 2014, the most recent impairment analysis date, the fair value of the First Data trade name exceeded its carrying value.

Reserve for merchant credit losses and check guaranteesguarantees: With respect to theOur merchant acquiring business, our merchant customersclients (or those of our unconsolidated alliances) have the liability for any charges properly reversed by the cardholder. In the event, however, that we are not able to collect such amounts from the merchants due to merchant fraud, insolvency, bankruptcy or another reason, we may be liable for any such reversed charges. Our risk in this area primarily relates to situations where the cardholder has purchased goods or services to be delivered in the future such as airline tickets.and which have yet to be delivered.

Our obligation to stand ready to perform is minimal in relation to the total dollar volume processed. We require cash deposits, guarantees, letters of credit or other types of collateral from certain merchants to minimize this obligation. The amounts of collateral held by us and our unconsolidated alliances are as follows:

As of December 31,
As of December 31,
(in millions)
2014
2013
2017
2016
Cash and cash equivalents collateral
$440.3

$479.4

$499

$494
Collateral in the form of letters of credit
92.6

106.0

133

134
Total collateral
$532.9

$585.4

$632

$628
We also utilize a number of systems and procedures to manage merchant risk. Despite these efforts, we historically have experienced some level of losses due to merchant defaults.

43





Our contingent obligation relates to imprecision in our estimates of required collateral. A provision for this obligation is recorded based primarily on historical experience of credit losses and other relevant factors such as economic downturns or increases in merchant fraud. The following table presents the aggregate merchant credit losses incurred compared to total dollar volumes processed: 
 
Year ended December 31,
 
2014
2013
2012
FDC and consolidated and unconsolidated alliances credit losses (in millions)
$62.9

$53.7

$50.0
FDC and consolidated alliances credit losses (in millions)
55.3

48.3

43.3
Total dollar volume acquired (in billions)
1,876.1

1,778.9

1,725.4
 
Year ended December 31,
(in millions) 
2017
2016
2015
First Data and consolidated and unconsolidated alliances credit losses
$98

$93

$67
First Data and consolidated alliances credit losses
89

83

55
Total dollar volume processed (in billions)
2,401

2,153

1,885

The reserve recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets onlyconsolidated balance sheets relates to the business conducted by our consolidated subsidiaries. The reserve for unconsolidated alliances is recorded only in the alliances’ respective financial statements. We have not recorded any reserve for estimated losses in excess of reserves recorded by the unconsolidated alliances nor have we identified needs to do so. The following table presents the aggregate merchant credit loss reserves:
 
As of December 31,
(in millions) 
2014
2013
FDC and consolidated and unconsolidated alliances merchant credit loss reserves
$23.8

$26.8
FDC and consolidated alliances merchant credit loss reserves
20.1

24.1
 
As of December 31,
(in millions) 
2017
2016
First Data and consolidated and unconsolidated alliances merchant credit loss reserves
$33

$28
First Data and consolidated alliances merchant credit loss reserves
29

23

The credit loss reserves, both for us and our unconsolidated alliances, are comprised of amounts for known losses and a provision for losses incurred but not reported (IBNR). These reserves primarily are determined by performing a historical analysis of

58





chargeback loss experience. Other factors are considered that could affect that experience in the future. Such items include the general economy and economic challenges in a specific industry or those affecting certain types of clients. Once these factors are considered, we or the unconsolidated alliance establishes a rate (percentage) that is calculated by dividing the expected chargeback (credit) losses by dollar volume processed. This rate is then applied against the dollar volume processed each month and charged against earnings. The resulting reserve balance is then compared to requirements for known losses and estimates for IBNR items. Historically, this estimation process has provenproved to be materially accurate and we believe the recorded reserve approximates the fair value of the contingent obligation.

The majority of the TeleCheck business involves the guarantee of checks received by merchants. If the check is returned, TeleCheck is required to purchase the check from the merchant at its face value and pursue collection from the check writer. A provision for estimated check returns, net of anticipated recoveries, is recorded at the transaction inception based on recent history. The following table presents the accrued warrantyestimate of losses on returned check and recovery balances:
  As of December 31,
(in millions) 2014 2013
Accrued warranty balances $8.5
 $9.4
Accrued recovery balances 25.3
 27.2
We establish an incremental liability (and deferred revenue) for the fair value of the check guarantee. The liability is relieved and revenue is recognized when the check clears, is presented to TeleCheck, or the guarantee period expires. The majority of the guarantees are settled within 30 days. The incremental liability was approximately $1 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. guarantees:
  As of December 31,
(in millions) 2017 2016
Estimate of losses on returned checks $4
 $5
Fair value of checks guaranteed 14
 17
The following table details the check guarantees of TeleCheck.
TeleCheck:
 
Year ended December 31,
 
2014
2013
2012
Aggregate face value of guaranteed checks (in billions)
$35.8

$38.9

$42.9
Aggregate amount of checks presented for warranty (in millions)
252.5

285.4

318.8
Warranty losses net of recoveries (in millions)
66.6

66.4

75.9

44
 
Year ended December 31,
 
2017
2016
2015
Aggregate face value of guaranteed checks (in billions)
$26

$28

$32
Aggregate amount of checks presented for warranty (in millions)
179

188

216
Warranty losses net of recoveries and service fees (in millions)
52

55

61





The estimate of losses on returned checks is included in “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities” and the fair value of checks guaranteed is included in “Accounts receivable, net” in the consolidated balance sheets. The maximum potential future payments under the guarantees were estimated by us to be approximately $1.2 billion$456 million as of December 31, 20142017 which represented an estimate of the total uncleared checks at that time.

Income taxestaxes: The determination of our provision for income taxes requires management’s judgment in the use of estimates and the interpretation and application of complex tax laws. Judgment is also required in assessing the timing and amounts of deductible and taxable items. We establish contingency reserves for material, known tax exposures relating to deductions, transactions, and other matters involving some uncertainty as to the proper tax treatment of the item. Our reserves reflect our judgment as to the resolution of the issues involved if subject to judicial review. Several years may elapse before a particular matter, for which we have established a reserve, is audited and finally resolved or clarified. While we believe that our reserves are adequate to cover reasonably expected tax risks, issues raised by a tax authority may be finally resolved at an amount different than the related reserve. Such differences could materially increase or decrease our income tax provision in the current and/or future periods. When facts and circumstances change (including a resolution of an issue or statute of limitations expiration), these reserves are adjusted through the provision for income taxes in the period of change. AsLargely, as the result of the interest and amortization expensesexpense that we incur, in the U.S. we are currently in a tax net operating loss position. Judgment is required to determine whether some portion or all of the resulting deferred tax assets will not be realized. To the extent we determine that we will not realize the benefit of some or all of our deferred tax assets, then these assets are adjusted through our provision for income taxes in the period in which this determination is made.

We are currently in a tax net operating loss position in several jurisdictions in which we operate, including the United States, federal jurisdiction, resulting in significant deferred tax assets. We establish a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets when, based upon the weight of all available evidence, we believe it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. We believe that a significant portion of the deferred tax assets will be realized because of the existence of sufficient taxable income within the carryforward period available under the tax law, but have established valuation allowances for those deferred tax assets that in our judgment will not be realized. In making this determination, we have considered the relative impact of all of the available positive and negative evidences regarding future sources of taxable income and tax planning strategies. However, there could be material impact to our effective tax rate if there is a significant change in our judgment. If and when our judgment changes, then the valuation allowances are adjusted through the provision for income taxes in the period in which this determination is made. Refer to Note 15note 8 "Income Taxes" to our Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding our income tax provision.

Stock-based compensation We have a stock incentive plan for certain employees of ours and our affiliates (stock plan). This stock plan is at the FDH level which owns 100% of our equity interests. The stock plan provides the opportunity for certain employees to purchase shares in FDH and then receive a number of stock options or restricted stock based on a multiple of their investment in such shares. The plan also allows for us to award shares and options to certain employees. The expense associated with this plan is recorded by us. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure the fair value of stock option awards. We chose the Black-Scholes model based on our experience with the model and the determination that the model could be used to provide a reasonable estimate of the fair value of awards with terms such as those issued by FDH. Option-pricing models require estimates of a number of key valuation inputs including expected volatility, expected dividend yield, expected term, and risk-free interest rate. Certain of these inputs are more subjective due to FDH being privately held and thus not having objective historical or public information. The most subjective inputs are the expected term, expected volatility and determination of share value. The expected term is determined using probability weighted expectations and expected volatility is determined using a selected group of guideline companies as surrogates for FDH.
Periodically, we estimate the fair value of FDH common stock. We rely on the results of a discounted cash flow analysis but also consider the results of a market approach. The discounted cash flow analysis is dependent on a number of significant management assumptions regarding the expected future financial results of ours and FDH as well as upon estimates of an appropriate cost of capital. A sensitivity analysis is performed in order to establish a narrow range of estimated fair values for the shares of FDH common stock. The market approach consists of identifying a set of guideline public companies. Multiples of historical and projected EBITDA determined based on the guideline companies is applied to FDH’s EBITDA in order to establish a range of estimated fair value for the shares of FDH common stock. We consider the results of both of these approaches, placing primary reliance on the discounted cash flow analysis. The concluded range of fair values is also compared to the value determined by the Board of Directors for use in transactions, including stock sales and repurchases. After considering all of these estimates of fair value, we then determine a single estimated fair value of the stock to be used in accounting for stock-based compensation.
As of December 31, 2014, time-based options were outstanding under the stock plan. The time options have a contractual term of 10 years. Time options vest equally over a three to five year period from the date of issuance. The options also have certain accelerated vesting provisions upon a change in control, a qualified public offering, or certain termination events.

4559





The assumptions used in estimating the fair value of share-based payment awards represent management’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As a result, if factors change and we use different assumptions, stock-based compensation expense could be different in the future.
Refer to Note 11 "Stock Compensation Plans" to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for details regarding our stock-based compensation plan.
New Accounting Guidance
Refer to Note 1 "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for new accounting guidance.

46





ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates. Our assets include cash equivalents as well as both fixed and floating rate interest-bearing securities. These investments arise primarily from settlement funds held by us pending settlement.
Our interest rate-sensitive liabilities are our debt instruments. Our senior secured term loan facility is subject to variable interest rates. We have interest rate swaps on $5.0 billion of the variable rate debt that convert it to fixed rates that expire in September 2016. In addition, we have a fixed to floating interest rate swap with a notional value of $750 million expiring in June 2019 with a mandatory termination date of June 2015, to maintain our ratio of fixed to floating rate debt. Therefore, as of December 31, 2014, we had approximately $4.4 billion of variable rate debt that is not subject to a fixed rate swap and includes the fixed to floating interest rate swap.
Based on the December 31, 2014 balances, a 10% proportionate increase in short-term interest rates on an annualized basis compared to the interest rates as of December 31, 2014, which for the three month LIBOR was 0.2556%, and a corresponding and parallel shift in the remainder of the yield curve, would result in a decrease to pretax income of $1 million. The $1 million decrease to pretax income (due to a 10% increase in variable rates as of December 31, 2014) is due to a $1 million increase in interest expense related to our balance of variable interest rate debt, net of interest rate swaps. Conversely, a corresponding decrease in interest rates would result in a comparable increase to pretax income. Actual interest rates could change significantly more than 10%. There are inherent limitations in the sensitivity analysis presented, primarily due to the assumption that interest rate movements are linear and instantaneous. As a result, the analysis is unable to reflect the potential effects of more complex market changes that could arise, which may positively or negatively affect income.
Foreign Currency Risk
We are exposed to changes in currency rates as a result of our investments in foreign operations, revenues generated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar and foreign currency-denominated loans. Revenue and profit generated by international operations will increase or decrease compared to prior periods as a result of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Refer to Note 5 "Derivative Financial Instruments" to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding the changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
A hypothetical uniform 10% weakening in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to all the currencies in which our revenues and profits are denominated would result in an increase to pretax income of approximately $14 million. The increase results from a $59 million increase related to foreign exchange on intercompany loans and a $19 million increase related to foreign exchange on foreign currency earnings, assuming consistent operating results as the twelve months preceding December 31, 2014. This increase is partially offset by a $62 million decrease related to a euro-denominated term loan held by us as well as a $3 million decrease related to two euro-denominated cross-currency swaps held by us. There are inherent limitations in the sensitivity analysis presented, primarily due to the assumption that foreign exchange rate movements are linear and instantaneous. As a result, the analysis is unable to reflect the potential effects of more complex market changes that could arise, which may positively or negatively affect income.
Regulatory
Through its merchant alliances, the Merchant Solutions segment holds an ownership interest in several competing merchant acquiring businesses while serving as the electronic processor for those businesses. In order to satisfy state and federal antitrust requirements, we actively maintain an antitrust compliance program.

47





ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

FIRST DATA CORPORATION
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
COVERED BY REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
(Item 15(a))


48





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholder of First Data Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of First Data Corporation as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), cash flows and equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014. Our audits also include the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of First Data Corporation at December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), First Data Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 27, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 27, 2015


49





FIRST DATA CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions)  2014 2013 2012
Revenues:  
  
  
Transaction and processing service fees:  
  
  
Merchant related services (a) $4,060.5
 $3,987.9
 $3,896.3
Check services 264.2
 286.7
 313.9
Card services (a) 1,817.1
 1,687.3
 1,737.7
Other services 513.7
 502.4
 504.2
Product sales and other (a) 892.8
 837.2
 866.7
Reimbursable debit network fees, postage, and other 3,603.5
 3,507.4
 3,361.5
Total revenues 11,151.8
 10,808.9
 10,680.3
Expenses:  
  
  
Cost of services (exclusive of items shown below) 2,741.3
 2,808.8
 2,863.5
Cost of products sold 337.2
 334.0
 336.3
Selling, general, and administrative 1,961.8
 1,888.8
 1,825.4
Reimbursable debit network fees, postage, and other 3,603.5
 3,507.4
 3,361.5
Depreciation and amortization 1,055.5
 1,091.3
 1,191.6
Other operating expenses:  
  
  
Restructuring, net 13.2
 48.0
 23.1
Impairments 
 
 5.1
Litigation and regulatory settlements 
 8.0
 
Total expenses 9,712.5
 9,686.3
 9,606.5
Operating profit 1,439.3
 1,122.6
 1,073.8
Interest income 10.6
 11.1
 8.8
Interest expense (1,753.0) (1,880.7) (1,897.8)
Loss on debt extinguishment (260.1) 
 
Other income (expense) 161.2
 (46.9) (94.3)
  (1,841.3) (1,916.5) (1,983.3)
Loss before income taxes and equity earnings in affiliates (402.0) (793.9) (909.5)
Income tax expense (benefit) 82.1

86.5

(224.0)
Equity earnings in affiliates 219.6
 188.3
 158.2
Net loss (264.5)
(692.1)
(527.3)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest 193.3
 177.0
 173.6
Net loss attributable to First Data Corporation $(457.8) $(869.1) $(700.9)
 (a)Includes processing fees, administrative service fees, and other fees charged to merchant alliances accounted for under the equity method of $181 million, $164 million, and $160 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


50





FIRST DATA CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions) 2014 2013 2012
Net loss $(264.5) $(692.1) $(527.3)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:  
  
  
Unrealized gains on securities (6.8) 1.2
 0.2
Unrealized gains on hedging activities 
 
 72.2
Pension liability adjustments (36.1) 40.8
 (38.6)
Foreign currency translation adjustment (308.5) (77.1) 15.7
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax (351.4) (35.1) 49.5
Comprehensive loss (615.9) (727.2) (477.8)
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest 181.9
 178.4
 176.9
Comprehensive loss attributable to First Data Corporation $(797.8) $(905.6) $(654.7)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


51





FIRST DATA CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
  As of December 31,
(in millions, except common stock share amounts) 2014 2013
ASSETS  
  
Current assets:  
  
Cash and cash equivalents $358.4
 $425.3
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $50.7 and $32.4 1,752.3
 1,763.9
Settlement assets 7,554.9
 7,541.8
Other current assets 288.8
 345.1
Total current assets 9,954.4
 10,076.1
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $1,233.1 and $1,149.9 929.7
 849.4
Goodwill 17,016.6
 17,247.8
Customer relationships, net of accumulated amortization of $4,870.8 and $4,418.3 2,604.1
 3,162.3
Other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $1,965.1 and $1,743.5 1,745.4
 1,719.6
Investment in affiliates 1,101.0
 1,334.3
Long-term settlement assets 3.5
 15.2
Other long-term assets 914.6
 835.1
Total assets $34,269.3
 $35,239.8
     
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY  
  
Current liabilities:  
  
Accounts payable $280.3
 $287.8
Short-term and current portion of long-term borrowings 160.8
 146.3
Settlement obligations 7,557.3
 7,553.4
Other current liabilities 1,532.2
 1,630.5
Total current liabilities 9,530.6
 9,618.0
Long-term borrowings 20,711.4
 22,556.8
Long-term deferred tax liabilities 520.9
 553.0
Other long-term liabilities 788.2
 750.1
Total liabilities 31,551.1
 33,477.9
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 9) 

 

Redeemable noncontrolling interest 70.4
 69.1
First Data Corporation stockholder’s deficit:  
  
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000 shares authorized and issued (2014 and 2013) 
 
Additional paid-in capital 9,905.8
 7,384.0
Paid-in capital 9,905.8
 7,384.0
Accumulated loss (9,429.0) (8,284.9)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (928.7) (588.7)
Total First Data Corporation stockholder’s deficit (451.9) (1,489.6)
Noncontrolling interests 3,099.7
 3,182.4
Total equity 2,647.8
 1,692.8
Total liabilities and equity $34,269.3
 $35,239.8
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

52





FIRST DATA CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions) 2014
2013
2012
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES  
  
  
Net loss
$(264.5)
$(692.1)
$(527.3)
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities:
 

 

 
Depreciation and amortization (including amortization netted against equity earnings in affiliates and revenues)
1,163.3

1,211.9

1,330.9
Charges related to other operating expenses and other income
112.2

102.9

122.5
Other non-cash and non-operating items, net
2.6

(8.8)
(40.2)
Increase (decrease) in cash, excluding the effects of acquisitions and dispositions, resulting from changes in:
 

 

 
Accounts receivable, current and long-term
(61.2)
63.3

(49.8)
Other assets, current and long-term
62.4

2.8

260.0
Accounts payable and other liabilities, current and long-term
12.0

(1.2)
(34.6)
Income tax accounts
(13.6)
(6.1)
(294.1)
Net cash provided by operating activities
1,013.2

672.7

767.4
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES  
  
  
Proceeds from dispositions, net of expenses paid
270.1

18.1


Additions to property and equipment
(308.0)
(194.1)
(193.1)
Payments to secure customer service contracts, including outlays for conversion, and capitalized systems development costs
(258.5)
(184.4)
(177.2)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
(30.8)
(12.1)
(32.9)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
2.7

11.8

8.0
Contributions to equity method investments




(7.9)
Other investing activities
(4.3)
7.6

6.0
Net cash used in investing activities
(328.8)
(353.1)
(397.1)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES  
  
  
Short-term borrowings, net
11.8

(109.6)
99.1
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
350.0




Debt modification (payments) proceeds and related financing costs
(342.8)
(10.3)
17.3
Principal payments on long-term debt
(2,261.8)
(92.2)
(83.3)
Proceeds from sale-leaseback transactions




13.8
Distributions and dividends paid to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest
(265.4)
(224.5)
(261.9)
Purchase of noncontrolling interest
(1.0)
(23.7)
(25.1)
Capital transactions with parent, net
1,788.2

(29.8)
(8.4)
Net cash used in financing activities
(721.0)
(490.1)
(248.5)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (30.3) (12.5) 0.8
Change in cash and cash equivalents (66.9)
(183.0)
122.6
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 425.3
 608.3
 485.7
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $358.4

$425.3

$608.3
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:      
Income tax payments, net of refunds received $95.6
 $92.6
 $70.1
Interest paid 1,700.5
 1,802.2
 1,793.9
Distributions received from equity method investments 278.0
 260.7
 244.5
NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS:      
Capital leases, net of trade-ins $127.7
 $112.0
 $55.0
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

53





FIRST DATA CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
  First Data Corporation Shareholder    
(in millions, except common stock share amounts) 
Common
 Shares
 
Accumulated
Loss
 
Accumulated
 Other Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Paid-In
 Capital
 
Noncontrolling
 Interests
 Total
Balance, December 31, 2011 1,000
 $(6,680.2) $(598.4) $7,375.2
 $3,311.4
 $3,408.0
             
Distributions and dividends paid to noncontrolling interests 
 
 
 
 (225.9) (225.9)
Net (loss) income (a) 
 (700.9) 
 
 137.6
 (563.3)
Other comprehensive income 
 
 46.2
  
 3.3
 49.5
Stock compensation expense and other 
 
 
 12.4
 
 12.4
Cash dividends paid by First Data Corporation to Parent 
 (6.7) 
 
 
 (6.7)
Purchase of noncontrolling interest 
 
 
 (46.1) (1.5) (47.6)
Balance, December 31, 2012 1,000
 (7,387.8) (552.2) 7,341.5
 3,224.9
 2,626.4
            

Distributions and dividends paid to noncontrolling interests 
 
 
 
 (190.0) (190.0)
Net (loss) income (a) 
 (869.1) 
 
 142.9
 (726.2)
Other comprehensive (loss) income 
 
 (36.5) 
 1.4
 (35.1)
Adjustments to redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interest 
 
 
 (2.0) 
 (2.0)
Stock compensation expense and other 
 
 
 32.2
 
 32.2
Capital contributed by Parent 
 
 
 6.5
 
 6.5
Cash dividends paid by First Data Corporation to Parent 
 (28.0) 
 
 
 (28.0)
Purchase of noncontrolling interest 
 
 
 5.8
 3.2
 9.0
Balance, December 31, 2013 1,000
 (8,284.9) (588.7) 7,384.0
 3,182.4
 1,692.8
            

Distributions and dividends paid to noncontrolling interests 
 
 
 
 (230.9) (230.9)
Net (loss) income (a) 
 (457.8) 
 
 159.6
 (298.2)
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 (340.0) 
 (11.4) (351.4)
Adjustment to redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interest 
 
 
 (2.1) 
 (2.1)
Stock compensation expense and other 
 
 
 43.0
 
 43.0
Capital contributed by Parent 
 
 
 2,481.9
 
 2,481.9
Cash dividends paid by First Data Corporation to Parent 
 (686.3) 
 
 
 (686.3)
Purchase of noncontrolling interest 
 
 
 (1.0) 
 (1.0)
Balance, December 31, 2014 1,000
 $(9,429.0) $(928.7) $9,905.8
 $3,099.7
 $2,647.8
(a)The total net loss presented in the Consolidated Statements of Equity for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 is $34 million, $34 million, and $36 million, respectively, greater than the amount presented on the Consolidated Statements of Operations due to the net income attributable to the redeemable noncontrolling interest not included in equity.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

54





FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Business Description
First Data Corporation (FDC or the Company) is a global provider of electronic commerce and payment solutions for merchants, financial institutions, and card issuers. The services the Company provides include merchant transaction processing and acquiring; credit, retail, and debit card issuing and processing; prepaid services; and check verification, settlement and guarantee services.
Consolidation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements of FDC include the accounts of FDC and its controlled subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Investments in unconsolidated affiliated companies are accounted for under the equity method and are included in “Investment in affiliates” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company generally utilizes the equity method of accounting when it has an ownership interest of between 20% and 50% in an entity, provided the Company is able to exercise significant influence over the investee’s operations.
The Company consolidates an entity’s financial statements when the Company has a controlling financial interest in the entity. Control is normally established when ownership interests exceed 50% in an entity; however, when the Company does not exercise control over a majority-owned entity as a result of other investors having rights over the management and operations of the entity, the Company accounts for the entity under the equity method. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, there were no greater-than-50%-owned affiliates whose financial statements were not consolidated.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Presentation
Depreciation and amortization presented as a separate line item on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations does not include amortization of initial payments for new contracts which is recorded as a contra-revenue within “Transaction and processing service fees.” Also not included is amortization related to equity method investments which is netted within the “Equity earnings in affiliates” line. The following table presents the amounts associated with such amortization:
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions) 2014
2013
2012
Amortization of initial payments for new contracts $45.3
 $41.5
 $44.5
Amortization related to equity method investments 62.5
 79.1
 94.8
Revenue Recognition
The majority of the Company’s revenues are comprised of: 1) transaction-based fees, which typically constitute a percentage of dollar volume processed; 2) fees per transaction processed; 3) fees per account on file during the period; or 4) some combination thereof.

In multiple-element transactions, revenue is allocated to the separate units of accounting provided each element has stand-alone value to the customer. Stand-alone value is based on the relative selling price of any undelivered items for which delivery is probable and substantially within the Company’s control.
In the case of merchant contracts that the Company owns and manages, revenue is comprised of fees charged to the merchant, net of interchange and assessments charged by the credit card associations, and is recognized at the time the merchant accepts a point of sale transaction. The fees charged to the merchant are a percentage of the credit card and signature based debit card

55



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


transaction’s dollar value, a fixed amount or a combination of the two. Personal identification number based debit (PIN-debit) network fees are recognized in “Reimbursable debit network fees, postage, and other” revenues and expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. STAR network access fees charged to merchants are assessed on a per transaction basis. Interchange fees and assessments charged by credit card associations to the Company’s consolidated subsidiaries and network fees related to PIN-debit transactions charged by debit networks are as follows:
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions) 2014 2013 2012
Interchange fees and assessments $20,405.7
 $19,367.7
 $18,373.0
Debit network fees 2,964.5
 2,914.9
 2,786.3
The Company charges processing fees to its merchant alliances. In situations where an alliance is accounted for under the equity method, the Company’s consolidated revenues include the processing fees charged to the alliance, as presented on the face of the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Revenue from check verification, settlement, and guarantee services is recognized at the time of sale less the fair value of the guarantee. The fair value of the guarantee is deferred and recognized at the later of the Company being called upon to honor the guarantee or the expiration of the guarantee. Check verification fees generally are a fixed amount per transaction while check guarantee fees generally are a percentage of the check amount.
The purchase and sale of merchant contracts is an ordinary element of the Company’s Merchant Solutions and International businesses, and therefore, the gains from selling these revenue-generating assets are included within the “Product sales and other” component of revenues.
Fees based on cardholder accounts on file, both active and inactive, are recognized after the requisite services or period has occurred. Fees for PIN-debit transactions where the Company is the debit card processor for the financial institution are recognized on a per transaction basis. Revenues for output services are derived primarily on a per piece basis and consist of fees for the production, materials, and postage related to mailing finished products and recognized as the services are provided.
The sale and leasing of point-of-sale (POS) devices (terminals) are also reported in “Product sales and other”. Revenue for terminals sold or sold under a sales-type lease transaction is recognized when the following four criteria are met: evidence of an agreement exists, delivery has occurred, the selling price or minimum lease payments are fixed or determinable, and collection of the selling price or minimum lease payments is reasonably assured. Revenue for operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Services not specifically described above are generally transaction based fees that are recognized at the time the transactions are processed or programming services that are recorded as work is performed.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation to employees is measured at the grant date fair values of the respective stock options and restricted stock awards. For awards without certain liquidity or employment triggers, expense is recognized over the requisite service periods and for awards with certain liquidity or employment triggers, expense is recognized upon the occurrence of such events. An estimate of forfeitures is applied when calculating compensation expense. The Company recognizes compensation cost on awards with graded vesting on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. Refer to Note 11 "Stock Compensation Plans" of these Consolidated Financial Statements for details regarding the Company’s stock-based compensation plan.

56



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Foreign Currency Translation
The U.S. dollar is the functional currency for most of the Company’s U.S.-based businesses and certain foreign-based businesses. Significant operations with a local currency as their functional currency include operations in the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, Ireland, Greece, and Argentina. Foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities for these units and other less significant operations are translated into U.S. dollars based on exchange rates prevailing at the end of the period, and revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates during each monthly period. The effects of foreign exchange gains and losses arising from the translation of assets and liabilities of those entities where the functional currency is not the U.S. dollar are included as a component of Other Comprehensive Income (OCI). Intercompany loans are generally not considered invested on a long-term basis and such foreign currency gains and losses are recorded in income. Transaction gains and losses related to operating assets and liabilities are included in the “Cost of services” and “Selling, general, and administrative” lines of the Consolidated Statements of Operations and were immaterial. Non-operating transaction gains and losses derived from non-operating assets and liabilities are included in the “Other income (expense)” line of the Consolidated Statements of Operations and are separately disclosed in Note 7 "Supplemental Financial Information" of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company is exposed to various financial and market risks, including those related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, that exist as part of its ongoing business operations. The Company uses derivative instruments (i) to mitigate cash flow risks with respect to changes in interest rates (forecasted interest payments on variable rate debt), (ii) to maintain a desired ratio of fixed rate and floating rate debt, and (iii) to protect the net investment in certain foreign subsidiaries and/or affiliates with respect to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company’s objective is to engage in risk management strategies that provide adequate downside protection.

Derivative instruments are entered into for periods consistent with related underlying exposures. The Company applies strict policies to manage each of these risks, including prohibition against derivatives trading, derivatives market-making or any other speculative activities. Although most of the Company’s derivatives either do not qualify or are not designated for hedge accounting, they are maintained for economic hedge purposes and are not considered speculative.

The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and the underlying hedged items, as well as its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives that have been designated as cash flow hedges to forecasted transactions and net investment hedges to the underlying investment in a foreign subsidiary or affiliate. For designated hedges, the Company formally assesses, both at inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the hedge is highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows or foreign currency exposure of the underlying hedged items. The Company also performs an assessment of the probability of the forecasted transactions on a periodic basis. If it is determined that a derivative ceases to be highly effective during the term of the hedge or if the forecasted transaction is no longer probable, the Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively for such derivative.

The Company monitors the financial stability of its derivative counterparties and all counterparties remain highly-rated (in the “A” category or higher). The credit risk inherent in these agreements represents the possibility that a loss may occur from the nonperformance of a counterparty to the agreements. The Company performs a review at inception of the hedge, as circumstances warrant, and at least on a quarterly basis, of the credit risk of these counterparties. The Company also monitors the concentration of its contracts with individual counterparties. The Company’s exposures are in liquid currencies (primarily in U.S. dollars, euros, Australian dollars, British pounds, and Canadian dollars), so there is minimal risk that appropriate derivatives to maintain the hedging program would not be available in the future.

The Company recognizes all derivative financial instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as assets or liabilities at fair value. Such amounts are recorded in “Other current assets”, “Other long-term assets”, “Other current liabilities” or “Other long-term liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s policy is to present all derivative balances on a gross basis, without regard to counterparty master netting agreements or similar arrangements. Changes in fair value of derivative instruments are recognized immediately in earnings unless the derivative is designated and qualifies as a hedge of future cash flows or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. For derivatives that qualify as hedges of future cash flows, the effective portion of changes in fair value is recorded temporarily in equity as a component of OCI and then recognized in earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged item affects earnings. For derivatives that qualify as a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation, the gain or loss is reported in OCI as part of the cumulative translation adjustment to the extent the hedge is effective. Any ineffective portions of cash flow hedges and net investment hedges are recognized in the

57



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


“Other income (expense)” line in the Consolidated Statements of Operations during the period of change. Additional discussion of derivative instruments is provided in Note 5 "Derivative Financial Instruments" of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
Noncontrolling and Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
Noncontrolling interests represent the minority shareholders’ share of the net income or loss and equity in consolidated subsidiaries. Substantially all of the Company’s noncontrolling interests are presented pretax in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as “Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest” since the majority of the Company’s non-wholly owned consolidated subsidiaries are flow through entities for tax purposes. Noncontrolling interests are presented as a component of equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and reflect the original investments by these noncontrolling shareholders in the consolidated subsidiaries, along with their proportionate share of the earnings or losses of the subsidiaries, net of dividends or distributions. Noncontrolling interests that are redeemable at the option of the holder are presented outside of equity and are carried at their estimated redemption value. A noncontrolling interest is recorded on the date of acquisition based on the total fair value of the acquired entity and the noncontrolling interest’s share of that value.
Reserve for Merchant Credit Losses and Check Guarantees
With respect to the merchant acquiring business, the Company’s merchant customers (or those of its unconsolidated alliances) have the liability for any charges properly reversed by the cardholder. In the event, however, that the Company is not able to collect such amounts from the merchants due to merchant fraud, insolvency, bankruptcy or another reason, the Company may be liable for any such reversed charges. The Company’s risk in this area primarily relates to situations where the cardholder has purchased goods or services to be delivered in the future such as airline tickets.
The Company’s obligation to stand ready to perform is minimal in relation to the total dollar volume processed. The Company requires cash deposits, guarantees, letters of credit or other types of collateral from certain merchants to minimize this obligation. Collateral held by the Company is classified within “Settlement assets” and the obligation to repay the collateral if it is not needed is classified within “Settlement obligations” on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company also utilizes a number of systems and procedures to manage merchant risk. Despite these efforts, the Company historically has experienced some level of losses due to merchant defaults.
The Company’s contingent obligation relates to imprecision in its estimates of required collateral. A provision for this obligation is recorded based primarily on historical experience of credit losses and other relevant factors such as economic downturns or increases in merchant fraud. Merchant credit losses are included in “Cost of services” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The amount of the reserves attributable to entities consolidated by the Company was $20 million and $24 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
The majority of the TeleCheck Services, Inc. (TeleCheck) business involves the guarantee of checks received by merchants. If the check is returned, TeleCheck is required to purchase the check from the merchant at its face value and pursue collection from the check writer. A provision for estimated check returns, net of anticipated recoveries, is recorded at the transaction inception based on recent history. The following table presents the accrued warranty and recovery balances:
  As of December 31,
(in millions) 2014 2013
Accrued warranty balances $8.5
 $9.4
Accrued recovery balances 25.3
 27.2
Accrued warranties are included in “Other current liabilities” and accrued recoveries are included in “Accounts receivable” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The maximum potential future payments under the guarantees were estimated by the Company to be approximately $1.2 billion as of December 31, 2014 which represented an estimate of the total uncleared checks at that time.
Income Taxes
The Company and its domestic subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. income tax return with their parent, First Data Holdings, Inc. (FDH). The Company’s foreign operations file income tax returns in their local jurisdictions. Income taxes are computed in accordance with current accounting guidance and reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the financial reporting carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and the corresponding income tax amounts. The Company has deferred tax assets and liabilities and maintains valuation allowances where it is more likely than not that all or a portion of

58



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


deferred tax assets will not be realized. To the extent the Company determines that it will not realize the benefit of some or all of its deferred tax assets, then these deferred tax assets will be adjusted through the Company’s provision for income taxes in the period in which this determination is made.
The Company recognizes the tax benefits from uncertain tax positions only when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits of the position, that the tax position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of any related appeals or litigation. The tax benefits recognized in the consolidated financial statements from such a position are measured as the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Investments (other than those included in settlement assets) with original maturities of three months or less (that are readily convertible to cash) are considered to be cash equivalents and are stated at cost, which approximates market value. Cash and cash equivalents that were restricted from use due to regulatory requirements are included in “Other long-term assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and were immaterial as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.
Accounts Receivable and Leasing Receivables
Accounts receivable balances are stated net of allowance for doubtful accounts. Historically, the Company has infrequently incurred significant write-offs. The Company records allowances for doubtful accounts when it is probable that the accounts receivable balance will not be collected. Long-term accounts receivable balances are included in “Other long-term assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Company has receivables associated with its POS terminal leasing businesses. Leasing receivables are included in “Accounts receivable” and “Other long-term assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company recognizes interest income on its leasing receivables using the effective interest method. Interest income from leasing receivables is included in “Product sales and other” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. For direct financing leases, the interest rate used incorporates initial direct costs included in the net investment in the lease. For sales type leases, initial direct costs are expensed as incurred.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method over the lesser of the estimated useful life of the related assets (generally three to 10 years for equipment, furniture, and leasehold improvements, and 30 years for buildings) or the lease term. Maintenance and repairs which do not extend the useful life of the respective assets are charged to expense as incurred. The following table presents the amounts charged to expense for the depreciation and amortization of property and equipment, including equipment under capital lease:
Year ended December 31, 
(in millions) Amount
2014$286.7
2013288.4
2012284.5
Goodwill and Other Intangibles
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over tangible and intangible assets acquired less liabilities assumed arising from business combinations. Goodwill is generally allocated to reporting units based upon relative fair value (taking into consideration other factors such as synergies) when an acquired business is integrated into multiple reporting units. The Company’s reporting units are at the operating segment level or businesses one level below the operating segment level for which discrete financial information is prepared and regularly reviewed by management. When a business within a reporting unit is disposed of, goodwill is allocated to the disposed business using the relative fair value method. Relative fair value is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis.
The Company tests goodwill annually for impairment, as well as upon an indicator of impairment, using a fair value approach at the reporting unit level. The Company estimates the fair value of each reporting unit using a discounted cash flow analysis. The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test in the fourth quarters of 2014 and 2013. As of October 1, 2014,

59



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


the most recent impairment analysis date, the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded its carrying value. The Company did not record any goodwill impairment charges in 2014 or 2013.

The following table presents changes to goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014:

  Merchant Financial   
All Other
and
 Divested  
(in millions) Solutions Services International Corporate Operations Totals
Balance as of January 1, 2013  
  
  
  
  
  
Goodwill $14,071.8
 $3,451.4
 $2,641.1
 $177.0
 $181.3
 $20,522.6
Accumulated impairment losses (1,106.5) (1,399.7) (375.6) (177.0) (181.3) (3,240.1)
  12,965.3
 2,051.7
 2,265.5
 
 
 17,282.5
Acquisitions 24.4
 
 
 
 
 24.4
Other adjustments (primarily foreign currency) (0.7) 
 (58.4) 
 
 (59.1)
Balance as of December 31, 2013  
  
  
  
  
  
Goodwill 14,095.5
 3,451.4
 2,582.7
 177.0
 181.3
 20,487.9
Accumulated impairment losses (1,106.5) (1,399.7) (375.6) (177.0) (181.3) (3,240.1)
  12,989.0
 2,051.7
 2,207.1
 
 
 17,247.8
Acquisitions 33.0
 
 
 
 
 33.0
Other adjustments (primarily foreign currency) 
 
 (264.2) 
 
 (264.2)
Balance as of December 31, 2014  
  
  
  
  
  
Goodwill 14,128.5
 3,451.4
 2,318.5
 177.0
 181.3
 20,256.7
Accumulated impairment losses (1,106.5) (1,399.7) (375.6) (177.0) (181.3) (3,240.1)
  $13,022.0
 $2,051.7
 $1,942.9
 $
 $
 $17,016.6

Customer relationships represent the estimated value of the Company’s relationships with customers, primarily merchants and financial institutions, to which it provides services. Customer relationships are amortized based on the pattern of undiscounted cash flows for the period as a percentage of total projected undiscounted cash flows. The Company selected this amortization method for these customer relationships based on a conclusion that the projected undiscounted cash flows could be reliably determined.
The Company capitalizes initial payments for new contracts, contract renewals, and conversion costs associated with customer processing relationships to the extent recoverable through future operations, contractual minimums, and/or penalties in the case of early termination. The Company’s accounting policy is to limit the amount of capitalized costs for a given contract to the lesser of the estimated ongoing future cash flows from the contract or the termination fees the Company would receive in the event of early termination of the contract by the customer. The initial payments for new contracts and contract renewals are amortized over the term of the contract as a reduction of the associated revenue (transaction and processing service fees). Conversion costs are also amortized over the term of the contract but are recorded as an expense in “Depreciation and amortization” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company develops software that is used in providing processing services to customers. To a lesser extent, the Company also develops software to be sold or licensed to customers. Costs incurred during the preliminary project stage are expensed as incurred. Capitalization of costs begins when the preliminary project stage is completed and management, with the relevant authority, authorizes and commits to funding the project and it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used to perform the function intended. Capitalization of costs ceases when the software is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. Software development costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the software, which is generally five years. Software acquired in connection with business combinations is amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the software which generally ranges from three to 10 years.
In addition to capitalized contract and software development costs, other intangibles include copyrights, patents, purchased software, trademarks, and non-compete agreements acquired in business combinations. Other intangibles, except for the First Data trade name discussed below, are amortized on a straight-line basis over the length of the contract or benefit period, which

60



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


generally ranges from three to 25 years. The intangible amortization expense associated with customer relationships and other intangibles, including amortization associated with investments in affiliates, was as follows:
Year ended December 31, 
(in millions) Amount
2014$876.6
2013923.5
20121,046.4
The carrying value of the First Data trade name is $604 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. Upon consideration of many factors, including the determination that there are no legal, regulatory or contractual provisions that limit the useful life of the First Data trade name, the Company determined that the First Data trade name had an indefinite useful life. The Company also considered the effects of obsolescence, demand, competition, other economic factors, and ability to maintain and protect the trade name without significant expenditures. The First Data trade name is expected to contribute directly or indirectly to the future cash flows of the Company for an indefinite period. As an indefinite lived asset, the First Data trade name is not amortized but is reviewed annually for impairment until such time as it is determined to have a finite life. The First Data trade name was not impaired as of December 31, 2014 or 2013.
The following table provides the components of other intangibles:
  As of December 31,
  2014 2013
    Accumulated 
Net of
Accumulated
   Accumulated 
Net of
Accumulated
(in millions)  Cost Amortization Amortization Cost Amortization Amortization
Customer relationships $7,474.9
 $(4,870.8) $2,604.1
 $7,580.6
 $(4,418.3) $3,162.3
             
Other intangibles:  
  
  
  
  
  
Conversion costs $205.0
 $(88.8) $116.2
 $166.6
 $(71.3) $95.3
Contract costs 234.8
 (130.6) 104.2
 218.0
 (110.8) 107.2
Software 1,856.0
 (1,415.1) 440.9
 1,649.4
 (1,264.3) 385.1
Other, including trade names 1,414.7
 (330.6) 1,084.1
 1,429.1
 (297.1) 1,132.0
Total other intangibles $3,710.5
 $(1,965.1) $1,745.4
 $3,463.1
 $(1,743.5) $1,719.6
The estimated future aggregate amortization expense for the next five years is as follows:
Year ended December 31, 
(in millions)Amount
2015$750.8
2016588.2
2017486.2
2018419.0
2019364.7
The Company tests contract and conversion costs for recoverability on an annual basis by comparing the remaining expected undiscounted cash flows under the contract to the net book value. Any assets that are determined to be unrecoverable are written down to their fair value. In addition to this annual test, these assets and all other long lived assets are tested for impairment upon an indicator of potential impairment.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Fair value is defined by accounting guidance as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company uses the hierarchy prescribed in the accounting guidance for fair value measurements, based upon the available inputs to the valuation and the degree to which they

61



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


are observable or not observable in the market. The Company maximizes the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels in the hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1 Inputs—Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that are accessible as of the measurement date.
Level 2 Inputs—Inputs other than quoted prices within Level 1 that are observable either directly or indirectly, including but not limited to quoted prices in markets that are not active, quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, and observable inputs other than quoted prices such as interest rates or yield curves.
Level 3 Inputs—Unobservable inputs reflecting the Company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis

During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company did not record any adjustments over $5 million to the carrying value of existing assets based on non-recurring fair value measurements.

New Accounting Guidance

Refer to note 1 "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for new accounting guidance.
ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates. Our assets include cash equivalents as well as both fixed and floating rate interest-bearing securities. These investments arise primarily from settlement funds held by us pending settlement.

Our interest rate-sensitive liabilities are our debt instruments. Our senior secured term loan facilities are subject to variable interest rates. As of December 31, 2017, we have $10 billion in variable rate debt, which includes $600 million on our accounts receivable securitization facility and also includes $272 million drawn on our revolving credit facility. Additionally, we have $4.3 billion in variable to fixed interest rate collar contracts, of which $1.5 billion expires in September 2018, $1.3 billion expires in January 2019, and the remaining $1.5 billion expires in September 2019. The interest rate collar contracts mitigate exposure to interest rate fluctuations, but are subject to contractual ceilings and floors. The interest rate collar contracts provide for interest rate protection if one month LIBOR rises above 150 basis points on the contracts expiring September 2018 and January 2019 and 175 basis points on the contracts expiring September 2019.
Based on the December 31, 2017 balances, a 100 basis point increase in short-term interest rates on an annualized basis compared to the interest rates as of December 31, 2017, which for one month LIBOR was 1.56%, and a corresponding and parallel shift in the remainder of the yield curve, would result in a decrease to pretax income of $46 million. This decrease is due to a $62 million increase in interest expense related to our balance of variable interest rate debt, net of interest rate collar contracts partially offset by a $16 million increase in interest income primarily on settlement assets. A decrease in interest rates would result in an increase to pretax income. Actual interest rates could change significantly more than 100 basis points. There are inherent limitations in the sensitivity analysis presented, primarily due to the assumption that interest rate movements are linear and instantaneous. As a result, the analysis is unable to reflect the potential effects of more complex market changes that could arise, which may positively or negatively affect income.
Foreign Currency Risk
We are exposed to changes in currency rates as a result of our investments in foreign operations and revenues and expenses generated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Revenue and profit generated by international operations will increase or decrease compared to prior periods as a result of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Refer to note 13 "Derivative Financial Instruments" in our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding the changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

A hypothetical uniform 10% weakening in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to all the currencies in which our revenues and profits are denominated would result in an increase to pretax income of approximately $51 million. This increase results from a $45 million increase related to foreign exchange on foreign currency earnings, assuming consistent operating results as the twelve months preceding December 31, 2017, and a $6 million increase related to foreign exchange on intercompany loans. Foreign exchange exposure on pretax income has increased from the prior year driven by significant growth in foreign pretax earnings. There are inherent limitations in the sensitivity analysis presented, primarily due to the assumption that foreign exchange movements are linear and instantaneous. As a result, the analysis is unable to reflect the potential effects of more complex market changes that could arise, which may positively or negatively affect income.


60





ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

FIRST DATA CORPORATION
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
COVERED BY REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



61





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of First Data Corporation
Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of First Data Corporation as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), cash flows and equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company at December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated February 20, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
EY or one of its predecessors began serving consecutively as the Company’s (or one of its predecessors) auditor in 1980.
Atlanta, Georgia
February 20, 2018


62





FIRST DATA CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions, except per share amounts) 2017 2016 2015
Revenues:  
  
  
Transaction and processing service fees (a) $6,757
 $6,600
 $6,597
Product sales and other (a) 1,372
 1,239
 1,167
Total revenues (excluding reimbursable items) 8,129
 7,839
 7,764
Reimbursable debit network fees, postage, and other 3,923
 3,745
 3,687
Total revenues 12,052
 11,584
 11,451
Expenses:  
  
  
Cost of services (exclusive of items shown below) 2,763
 2,855
 2,871
Cost of products sold 359
 337
 356
Selling, general, and administrative 2,178
 2,035
 2,292
Depreciation and amortization 972
 949
 1,022
Other operating expenses 143
 61
 53
Total expenses (excluding reimbursable items) 6,415
 6,237
 6,594
Reimbursable debit network fees, postage, and other 3,923
 3,745
 3,687
Total expenses 10,338
 9,982
 10,281
Operating profit 1,714
 1,602
 1,170
Interest expense, net (937) (1,068) (1,537)
Loss on debt extinguishment (80) (70) (1,068)
Other income 16
 17
 29
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity earnings in affiliates 713
 481
 (1,406)
Income tax (benefit) expense (729)
81

101
Equity earnings in affiliates 222
 260
 239
Net income (loss) 1,664

660

(1,268)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
and redeemable noncontrolling interest
 199
 240
 213
Net income (loss) attributable to First Data Corporation $1,465
 $420
 $(1,481)
       
Net income (loss) per share:      
Basic $1.60
 $0.47
 $(7.70)
Diluted $1.56
 $0.46
 $(7.70)
       
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:      
Basic 916
 902
 192
Diluted 940
 921
 192
 (a)Includes processing fees, administrative service fees, and other fees charged to merchant alliances accounted for under the equity method of $215 million, $198 million, and $205 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.


63





FIRST DATA CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions) 2017 2016 2015
Net income (loss) $1,664
 $660
 $(1,268)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:  
  
  
Foreign currency translation adjustment 201
 (153) (290)
Pension liability adjustments 72
 38
 (13)
Derivative instruments 9
 3
 
Marketable securities 
 
 3
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax 282

(112)
(300)
Comprehensive income (loss) 1,946
 548
 (1,568)
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest 211
 235
 203
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to First Data Corporation $1,735
 $313
 $(1,771)
See notes to consolidated financial statements.


64





FIRST DATA CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
  As of December 31,
(in millions, except par value) 2017 2016
ASSETS  
  
Current assets:  
  
Cash and cash equivalents $498
 $385
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $45 and $74 2,176
 1,877
Settlement assets 20,363
 14,795
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 335
 360
Total current assets 23,372
 17,417
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $1,588 and $1,416 951
 883
Goodwill 17,710
 16,696
Customer relationships, net of accumulated amortization of $5,940 and $5,660 2,184
 1,739
Other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $2,665 and $2,365 1,935
 1,800
Investment in affiliates 1,054
 988
Other long-term assets 1,063
 769
Total assets $48,269
 $40,292
     
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY  
  
Current liabilities:  
  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $1,659
 $1,564
Short-term and current portion of long-term borrowings 1,271
 358
Settlement obligations 20,363
 14,795
Total current liabilities 23,293
 16,717
Long-term borrowings 17,927
 18,131
Deferred tax liabilities 77
 409
Other long-term liabilities 886
 831
Total liabilities 42,183
 36,088
Commitments and contingencies (See note 14) 

 

Redeemable noncontrolling interest 72
 73
First Data Corporation stockholders' equity:  
  
Class A Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,600 shares authorized as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, 492 shares and 372 shares issued as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively; and 482 shares and 368 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively 5
 4
Class B Common stock, $0.01 par value; 523 and 625 shares authorized as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively; 443 shares and 544 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 respectively 4
 5
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 100 shares authorized as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 ; no shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 
 
Class A Treasury stock, at cost, 11 shares and 5 shares as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively (149) (61)
Additional paid-in capital 13,495
 13,210
Accumulated loss (9,059) (10,524)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (1,144) (1,414)
Total First Data Corporation stockholders' equity 3,152
 1,220
Noncontrolling interests 2,862
 2,911
Total equity 6,014
 4,131
Total liabilities and equity $48,269
 $40,292
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

65





FIRST DATA CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions) 2017
2016
2015
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES  
  
  
Net income (loss)
$1,664

$660

$(1,268)
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities:
 

 

 
Depreciation and amortization (including amortization netted against equity earnings in affiliates and revenues)
1,073

1,061

1,133
Deferred income taxes (853) (38) (7)
Charges related to other operating expenses and other income
127

44

24
Loss on debt extinguishment 80
 70
 1,068
Stock-based compensation expense 245
 263
 329
Other non-cash and non-operating items, net
41

35

48
(Decrease) increase in cash, excluding the effects of acquisitions and dispositions, resulting from changes in:
 

 

 
Accounts receivable, current and long term
(196)
(81)
(184)
Other assets, current and long term
(36)
61

(199)
Accounts payable and other liabilities, current and long term
(82)
35

(162)
Income tax accounts
(16)
1

13
Net cash provided by operating activities
2,047
 2,111
 795
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES  
  
  
Additions to property and equipment
(271)
(232)
(282)
Payments to secure customer service contracts, including outlays for conversion, and capitalized systems development costs
(247)
(245)
(320)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
(1,607)
(6)
(89)
Proceeds from dispositions 88
 38
 4
Proceeds from the maturity of net investment hedges��90
 
 
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment


38

17
Other investing activities, net
(3)
20

(15)
Net cash used in investing activities
(1,950) (387) (685)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES  
  
  
Short-term borrowings, net
823

205

(31)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
4,968

3,533

10,258
Payment of call premiums and debt issuance cost
(63)
(53)
(1,062)
Principal payments on long-term debt
(5,409)
(5,073)
(11,568)
Payment of taxes related to net settlement of equity awards (94) (61) 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock 50
 23
 2,718
Distributions and dividends paid to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest
(260)
(316)
(312)
Other financing activities, net (6) 8
 (19)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
9
 (1,734) (16)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 7
 (34) (23)
Change in cash and cash equivalents 113
 (44) 71
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 385
 429
 358
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $498
 $385
 $429
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:      
Income tax payments, net of refunds received $142
 $118
 $95
Interest paid 916
 1,032
 1,815
Distributions received from equity method investments 266
 304
 289
NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS:      
Capital leases, net of trade-ins $112
 $136
 $83
Other financing arrangements $102
 $79
 $
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

66





FIRST DATA CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
  First Data Corporation Stockholders'    
  Common Stock Treasury Stock     Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)    
(in millions) Class A Class B Class A Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Loss  Noncontrolling Interest  
 Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount     Total
Balance, December 31, 2014 (a) 
 $
 
 $
 
 $
 $9,906
 $(9,459) $(1,017) $3,100
 $2,530
                       
Dividends and distributions paid to noncontrolling interests (b) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (277) (277)
Net income (loss) (c) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (1,481) 
 179
 (1,302)
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (290) (10) (300)
Adjustments to redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interest 
 
 
 
 
 
 (8) 
 
 
 (8)
Stock compensation expense and other 
 
 
 
 
 
 316
 
 
 
 316
Cash dividends paid by First Data Corporation to former Parent 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (4) 
 
 (4)
Holding company merger (a) 
 
 719
 7
 
 
 (20) 
 
 
 (13)
Initial Public Offering 180
 2
 
 
 
 
 2,716
       2,718
Balance, December 31, 2015 (a) 180
 2
 719
 7
 
 
 12,910
 (10,944) (1,307) 2,992
 3,660
                      

Dividends and distributions paid to noncontrolling interests (b) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (283) (283)
Net income (loss) (c) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 420
 
 207
 627
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (107) (5) (112)
Adjustments to redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interest 
 
 
 
 
 
 4
 
 
 
 4
Stock compensation expense 
 
 
 
 

 

 263
 
 
 
 263
Stock activity under stock compensation plans and other 188
 2
 (175) (2) 5
 (61) 33
 
 
 
 (28)
Balance, December 31, 2016 368
 4
 544
 5
 5
 (61) 13,210
 (10,524) (1,414) 2,911
 4,131
                      

Dividends and distributions paid to noncontrolling interests (b) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (229) (229)
Net income (loss) (c) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1,465
 
 168
 1,633
Other comprehensive income 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 270
 12
 282
Adjustment to redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interest 
 
 
 
 
 
 1
 
 
 
 1
Stock compensation expense 
 
 
 
 
 
 245
 
 
 
 245
Stock activity under stock compensation plans and other 114
 1
 (101) (1) 6
 (88) 39
 
 
 
 (49)
Balance, December 31, 2017 482
 $5
 443
 $4
 11
 $(149) $13,495
 $(9,059) $(1,144) $2,862
 $6,014
(a)1,000 shares relates to common stock without a class that was eliminated upon the merger with First Data Holdings.
(b)The total distribution presented in the consolidated statements of equity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 excludes $31 million, $33 million, and $35 million, respectively, in distributions paid to redeemable non-controlling interest not included in equity.
(c)The total net income (loss) presented in the consolidated statements of equity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 is $31 million different, $33 million different, and $34 million different, respectively, than the amount presented on the consolidated statements of operations due to the net income attributable to the redeemable noncontrolling interest not included in equity.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

67





FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Business Description

First Data Corporation (FDC or the Company) is a global leader in commerce-enabling technology and solutions for merchants, financial institutions, and card issuers. The Company provides merchant transaction processing and acquiring; credit, retail, and debit card issuing and processing; prepaid services; and check verification, settlement and guarantee services; as well as solutions to help clients grow their businesses including the Company's Clover line of payment solutions and related applications.

On October 15, 2015, the Company filed its Prospectus with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b). The Company issued 176,076,869 shares of Class A common stock and began trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "FDC".

On October 13, 2015, First Data Holdings Inc. (FDH), the Company's direct parent company, merged with and into First Data Corporation, with First Data Corporation being the surviving entity (HoldCo Merger). All outstanding shares of FDH were converted into Class B common stock, which are entitled to ten votes per share. All outstanding common stock of First Data Corporation were eliminated upon the merger. The Company accounted for the HoldCo Merger as a transfer of assets between entities under common control and reflected the transaction in its financial statements on a prospective basis.

On October 13, 2015, the Company amended its certificate of incorporation which affected a reverse stock split of the Company’s authorized, issued and outstanding Class B common stock, on the basis of 1 new share of Class B common stock for each 3.16091 old shares of common stock.

Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its controlled subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Investments in unconsolidated affiliated companies are accounted for under the equity method and are included in “Investment in affiliates” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company generally utilizes the equity method of accounting when it has an ownership interest of between 20% and 50% in an entity, provided the Company is able to exercise significant influence over the investee’s operations.

The Company consolidates an entity’s financial statements when the Company has a controlling financial interest in the entity. Control is normally established when ownership interests exceed 50% in an entity; however, when the Company does not exercise control over a majority-owned entity as a result of other investors having rights over the management and operations of the entity, the Company accounts for the entity under the equity method.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Presentation

Depreciation and amortization, presented as a separate line item on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations, does not include amortization of initial payments for new contracts which is recorded as contra-revenue within “Transaction and processing service fees.” Also not included is amortization related to equity method investments which is netted within “Equity earnings in affiliates.”









68



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The following table presents the amounts associated with such amortization for the periods presented:
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions) 2017 2016
2015
Amortization of initial payments for new contracts $56
 $65
 $51
Amortization related to equity method investments 45
 47
 60
Revenue Recognition

The majority of the Company’s revenues are comprised of: 1) volume-based fees, which typically constitute a percentage of dollar volume processed; 2) fees per transaction processed; 3) fees per account on file during the period; or 4) some combination thereof.

The Company’s arrangements with clients often consist of multiple services and products (multiple-element arrangements).  In accounting for multiple-element arrangements, the Company assesses the elements of the contract and whether each element has standalone value and allocates revenue to the various elements based on their estimated selling price as a component of total consideration for the arrangement. The selling price is based on current selling prices offered by the Company or another party for current products or management's best estimate of a selling price.

Revenue is comprised of fees charged to the client, net of interchange fees and assessments charged by the credit card associations, and is recognized at the time the client accepts a point of sale transaction. The fees charged to the client are a percentage of the credit card and debit card transaction’s dollar value, a fixed amount, or a combination of the two. Personal identification number based debit (PIN-debit) and PINless-debit network fees are recognized in “Reimbursable debit network fees, postage, and other” revenues and expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

Interchange fees and assessments charged by credit card associations to the Company’s consolidated subsidiaries and network fees related to PIN-debit and PINless-debit transactions charged by debit networks were as follows for the periods presented:
 Year ended December 31,
(in millions) 2017 2016 2015
Interchange fees and assessments $26,069
 $23,810
 $21,711
Debit network fees 3,227
 3,121
 2,991

The Company charges processing fees to its alliances. In situations where an alliance is accounted for under the equity method, the Company’s consolidated revenues include the processing fees charged to the alliance, as presented in the consolidated statements of operations within "Transaction and processing service fees".

Revenue from check verification, settlement, and guarantee services is recognized at the time of sale less the fair value of the guarantee. The fair value of the guarantee is deferred and recognized at the later of the Company being called upon to honor the guarantee or the expiration of the guarantee. Check verification fees generally are a fixed amount per transaction while check guarantee fees generally are a percentage of the check amount.

The purchase and sale of merchant contract portfolios is an ordinary element of the Company’s businesses, and therefore, the gains from selling these revenue-generating assets are included within “Product sales and other” in the consolidated statements of operations.

Fees based on cardholder accounts on file are recognized as the requisite services or period occurs. Fees for PIN-debit transactions where the Company is the debit card processor for the financial institution are recognized on a per transaction basis. Revenues for output services are derived primarily on a per piece basis and consist of fees for the production, materials, and postage related to mailing finished products and recognized as the services are provided.

The sale and leasing of POS devices (terminals) are reported in “Product sales and other” in the consolidated statements of operations. Revenue for terminals sold or sold under a sales-type lease transaction is recognized when the following four criteria are met: evidence of an agreement exists, delivery has occurred, the selling price or minimum lease payments are fixed or determinable, and collection of the selling price or minimum lease payments is reasonably assured. Revenue for operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.


69



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Services not specifically described above are generally transaction based fees that are recognized at the time the transactions are processed or programming services that are either recorded as work is performed or are recognized over the life of the contract depending on the underlying business relationship.

Deferred Revenue

The Company records deferred revenue when it receives payments or invoices in advance of the delivery of products or the performance of services. The deferred revenue is recognized when underlying performance obligations are achieved. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, current deferred revenue included within "Accounts payable and accrued liabilities" in the Company's consolidated balance sheets was $175 million and $149 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, noncurrent deferred revenue included within "Other long-term liabilities" in the Company's consolidated balance sheets was $177 million and $184 million, respectively.

In January 2017, the Company determined that standalone value had been achieved for its Clover terminal devices, principally because a secondary market had been established. The Company accounted for the change on a prospective basis. Beginning January 1, 2017, the Company recognized revenue on sales of Clover terminal devices upon delivery, while Clover terminal devices sold prior to January 1, 2017 continued to be deferred over the term of the respective processing agreement. As of December 31, 2017, $36 million of the Company's deferred revenue represented sales of Clover terminal devices which did not have standalone value prior to the change in accounting.   

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation to employees is measured at the grant date fair values of the respective stock options and restricted stock awards. An estimate of forfeitures is applied when calculating compensation expense. To calculate the estimated forfeiture rate, the Company performed an analysis of all forfeitures over a five year period and continues to evaluate the actual forfeit rate compared to its estimate. The estimated forfeiture rate will be adjusted as actual forfeiture vary from the estimate, resulting in the recognition of compensation cost only for awards that vest. Any effect of a change in estimated forfeitures will be recognized through a cumulative catch-up adjustment. The Company recognizes compensation cost on service based awards with graded vesting on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. The Company recognizes compensation cost on performance-based restricted stock grants on a grant basis graded schedule. Refer to note 4 "Stock Compensation Plans" of these consolidated financial statements for details regarding the Company’s stock-based compensation plan.

Treasury Stock

In connection with the vesting of restricted stock awards or exercise of stock options, shares of Class A and Class B common stock are delivered to the Company by employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations. The Company accounts for treasury stock activities under the cost method whereby the cost of the acquired stock is recorded as treasury stock. Because Class B common stock converts automatically to Class A common stock upon any transfer, whether or not for value, except for certain transactions described in the Company's amended and restated certificate of incorporation, all shares of treasury stock reside as Class A.

Foreign Currency Translation

The U.S. dollar is the functional currency of the Company’s U.S.-based businesses and certain foreign-based businesses. Significant operations with a local currency as their functional currency include operations in the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, Ireland, Greece, Brazil and Argentina. Foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities for these units and other less significant operations are translated into U.S. dollars based on exchange rates prevailing at the end of the period, and revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates during each monthly period. The effects of foreign exchange gains and losses arising from the translation of assets and liabilities of those entities where the functional currency is not the U.S. dollar are included as a component of Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (OCI). Intercompany loans are generally not considered invested on a long-term basis and such foreign currency gains and losses are included in "Other income" on the consolidated statements of operations. Transaction gains and losses related to operating assets and liabilities are included in “Cost of services” and “Selling, general, and administrative” in the consolidated statements of operations and were immaterial for all periods presented. Non-operating transaction gains and losses derived from non-operating assets and liabilities are included in “Other income” on the consolidated statements of operations and are separately disclosed in note 16 "Supplemental Financial Information" of these consolidated financial statements.


70



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company is exposed to various financial and market risks, including those related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, that exist as part of its ongoing business operations. The Company uses derivative instruments (i) to mitigate cash flow risks with respect to changes in interest rates (forecasted interest payments on variable rate debt), (ii) to maintain a desired ratio of fixed rate and floating rate debt, and (iii) to protect the net investment in certain foreign subsidiaries and/or affiliates with respect to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company’s objective is to engage in risk management strategies that provide adequate downside protection.

Derivative instruments are entered into for periods consistent with related underlying exposures. The Company applies strict policies to manage each of these risks, including prohibition against derivatives trading, derivatives market-making or any other speculative activities.

The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and the underlying hedged items, as well as its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives that have been designated as cash flow hedges to forecasted transactions and net investment hedges to the underlying investment in a foreign subsidiary or affiliate. For designated hedges, the Company formally assesses, both at inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the hedge is highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows or foreign currency exposure of the underlying hedged items. The Company also performs an assessment of the probability of the forecasted transactions on a periodic basis. If it is determined that a derivative ceases to be highly effective during the term of the hedge or if the forecasted transaction is no longer probable, the Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively for such derivative.

The Company monitors the financial stability of its derivative counterparties and all counterparties are investment grade. The credit risk inherent in these agreements represents the possibility that a loss may occur from the nonperformance of a counterparty to the agreements. The Company performs a review at inception of the hedge, as circumstances warrant, and at least on a quarterly basis, of the credit risk of these counterparties. The Company also monitors the concentration of its contracts with individual counterparties. The Company’s exposures are in liquid currencies (primarily in U.S. dollars, euros, Australian dollars, British pounds, and Canadian dollars), so there is minimal risk that appropriate derivatives to maintain the hedging program would not be available in the future.

The Company recognizes all derivative financial instruments in the consolidated balance sheets as assets or liabilities at fair value. Such amounts are recorded in “Other current assets”, “Other long-term assets”, “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities” or “Other long-term liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s policy is to present all derivative balances on a gross basis, without regard to counterparty master netting agreements or similar arrangements. Changes in fair value of derivative instruments are recognized immediately in "Other income" on the consolidated statements of operations unless the derivative is designated and qualifies as a hedge of future cash flows or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. For derivatives that qualify as hedges of future cash flows, the effective portion of changes in fair value is recorded temporarily in equity as a component of OCI and then recognized in "Other income" in the consolidated statements of operations in the same period or periods during which the hedged item affects earnings. For derivatives that qualify as a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation, the gain or loss is reported in OCI as part of the cumulative translation adjustment to the extent the hedge is effective. Any ineffective portions of cash flow hedges and net investment hedges are recognized in “Other income” in the consolidated statements of operations during the period of change. Additional discussion of derivative instruments is provided in note 13 "Derivative Financial Instruments" of these consolidated financial statements.

Noncontrolling and Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests

Noncontrolling interests represent the minority shareholders’ share of the net income or loss and equity in consolidated subsidiaries. The Company’s noncontrolling interests are presented pretax in the consolidated statements of operations as “Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest” because the majority of the Company’s non wholly owned consolidated subsidiaries are flow through entities for tax purposes. Noncontrolling interests are presented as a component of equity in the consolidated balance sheets and reflect the original investments by these noncontrolling shareholders in the consolidated subsidiaries, along with their proportionate share of the earnings or losses of the subsidiaries, net of dividends or distributions. Noncontrolling interests that are redeemable at the option of the holder are presented outside of equity and are carried at their estimated redemption value. Refer to note 5 "Stockholders' Equity and Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest" of these consolidated financial statements for more information. A noncontrolling interest is recorded on the date of acquisition based on the total fair value of the acquired entity and the noncontrolling interest’s share of that value.


71



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Reserve for Merchant Credit Losses and Check Guarantees

With respect to the merchant acquiring business, the Company’s merchant customers (or those of its unconsolidated alliances) have the legal obligation to refund any charges properly reversed by the cardholder. In the event, however, that the Company is not able to collect such amounts from the merchants, the Company may be liable for any such reversed charges. The Company’s risk in this area primarily relates to situations where the cardholder has purchased goods or services to be delivered in the future.

The Company’s obligation to perform is minimal in relation to the total dollar volume processed. The Company requires cash deposits, guarantees, letters of credit or other types of collateral from certain merchants to minimize this obligation. Collateral held by the Company is classified within “Settlement assets” and the obligation to repay the collateral if it is not needed is classified within “Settlement obligations” on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The Company also utilizes a number of systems and procedures to manage merchant risk. Despite these efforts, the Company historically has experienced some level of losses due to merchant defaults. The amount of deposits and letters of credit held by the Company was $632 million and $628 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The Company’s contingent obligation relates to imprecision in its estimates of required collateral. A provision for this obligation is recorded based primarily on historical experience of credit losses and other relevant factors such as economic downturns or increases in merchant fraud. Merchant credit losses are included in “Cost of services” in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The amount of the reserves attributable to entities consolidated by the Company was $29 million and $23 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The majority of the TeleCheck business involves the guarantee of checks received by merchants. If the check is returned, TeleCheck is required to purchase the check from the merchant at its face value and pursue collection from the check writer. A provision for estimated check returns, net of anticipated recoveries, is recorded at the transaction inception based on recent history. The following table presents the estimate of losses on returned check and the fair value of check guarantees:
  As of December 31,
(in millions) 2017 2016
Estimate of losses on returned checks $4
 $5
Fair value of checks guaranteed 14
 17

The estimate of losses on returned checks is included in “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities” and the fair value of checks guaranteed is included in “Accounts receivable, net” in the consolidated balance sheets. The maximum potential future payments under the guarantees were approximately $456 million as of December 31, 2017 which represented an estimate of the total uncleared checks at that time.

Income Taxes

The Company and its domestic subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. income tax return. The Company’s foreign operations file income tax returns in their local jurisdictions. Income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the financial reporting carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and the corresponding income tax amounts. The Company has deferred tax assets and liabilities and maintains valuation allowances where it is more likely than not that all or a portion of deferred tax assets will not be realized. To the extent the Company determines that it will not realize the benefit of some or all of its deferred tax assets, these deferred tax assets will be adjusted through the Company’s provision for income taxes in the period in which this determination is made.

The Company recognizes the tax benefits from uncertain tax positions only when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits of the position, that the tax position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of any related appeals or litigation. The tax benefits recognized in the consolidated financial statements from such a position are measured as the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Investments (other than those included in settlement assets) with original maturities of three months or less (that are readily convertible to cash) are considered to be cash equivalents and are stated at cost, which approximates market value. Cash and cash equivalents that were restricted from use due to regulatory requirements are included in “Other long-term assets” in the consolidated balance sheets and was $27 million and $30 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.


72



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Accounts Receivable and Leasing Receivables

Accounts receivable balances are stated net of allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company records allowances for doubtful accounts when it is probable that the accounts receivable balance will not be collected. Long-term accounts receivable balances are included in “Other long-term assets” in the consolidated balance sheets.

The Company has receivables associated with its POS terminal leasing businesses. Leasing receivables are included in “Accounts receivable” and “Other long-term assets” in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company recognizes interest income on its leasing receivables using the effective interest method. Interest income from leasing receivables is included in “Product sales and other” in the consolidated statements of operations. For direct financing leases, the interest rate used incorporates initial direct costs included in the net investment in the lease. For sales type leases, initial direct costs are expensed as incurred.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method over the lesser of the estimated useful life of the related assets (generally three years to 10 years for equipment, furniture, and leasehold improvements, and 30 years for buildings) or the lease term. Maintenance and repairs which do not extend the useful life of the respective assets are expensed as incurred.

The following table presents depreciation expense related to property and equipment, including equipment under capital lease:
Year ended December 31,  
(in millions)  Amount
2017 $321
2016 300
2015 290

Goodwill and Other Intangibles

Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over tangible and intangible assets acquired less liabilities assumed arising from business combinations. Goodwill is generally allocated to reporting units based upon relative fair value (taking into consideration other factors such as synergies) when an acquired business is integrated into multiple reporting units. The Company’s reporting units are at the operating segment level or one level below the operating segment level for which discrete financial information is prepared and regularly reviewed by management. When a business within a reporting unit is disposed of, goodwill is allocated to the disposed business using the relative fair value method. Relative fair value is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis.

The Company tests goodwill annually for impairment, as well as upon an indicator of impairment, at the reporting unit level. The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test in the fourth quarters of 2017 and 2016. As of October 1, 2017, the most recent impairment analysis date, the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded its carrying value. The Company did not record any goodwill impairment charges in 2017, 2016, and 2015.

Customer relationships represent the estimated value of the Company’s relationships with customers, primarily merchants and financial institutions, to which it provides services. Customer relationships are amortized based on the pattern of undiscounted cash flows for the period as a percentage of total projected undiscounted cash flows. The Company selected this amortization method for these customer relationships based on a conclusion that the projected undiscounted cash flows could be reliably determined.

The Company capitalizes initial payments for new contracts, contract renewals, and conversion costs associated with customer processing relationships to the extent recoverable through cash flows from future operations, contractual minimums, and/or penalties in the case of early termination. The Company’s accounting policy is to limit the amount of capitalized costs for a given contract to the lesser of the estimated ongoing future cash flows from the contract or the termination fees the Company would receive in the event of early termination of the contract by the customer. The initial payments for new contracts and contract renewals are amortized over the term of the contract as a reduction of the associated revenue (transaction and processing service fees). Conversion costs are also amortized over the term of the contract but are recorded as an expense in “Depreciation and amortization” in the consolidated statements of operations.

The Company develops software that is used in providing processing services to customers. To a lesser extent, the Company also develops software to be sold or licensed to customers. Costs incurred during the preliminary project stage are expensed as incurred. Capitalization of costs begins when the preliminary project stage is completed and management, with the relevant authority,

73



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


authorizes and commits to funding the project and it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used to perform the function intended. Capitalization of costs ceases when the software is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. Software development costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the software, which is generally 5 years. Software acquired in connection with business combinations is amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the software which generally ranges from three years to 10 years.

In addition to capitalized contract and software development costs, other intangibles include copyrights, patents, purchased software, and trademarks acquired in business combinations. Other intangibles, except for the First Data trade name discussed in note 3 “Goodwill and Other Intangibles” of these consolidated financial statements, are amortized on a straight-line basis over the length of the contract or benefit period, which generally ranges from three years to 25 years.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Fair value is defined by accounting guidance as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company uses the hierarchy prescribed in the accounting guidance for fair value measurements, based upon the available inputs to the valuation and the degree to which they are observable or not observable in the market. The Company maximizes the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels in the hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1 Inputs—Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that are accessible as of the measurement date.

Level 2 Inputs—Inputs other than quoted prices within Level 1 that are observable either directly or indirectly, including but not limited to quoted prices in markets that are not active, quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, and observable inputs other than quoted prices such as interest rates or yield curves.

Level 3 Inputs—Unobservable inputs reflecting the Company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company did not record any adjustments over $5 million to the carrying value of existing assets based on non-recurring fair value measurements, other than as discussed in note 10 "Other Operating Expenses."

Net Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic net income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing Net income (loss) attributable to First Data Corporation by the weighted-average shares outstanding during the period, without consideration for any potential dilutive shares. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing Net income (loss) attributable to First Data Corporation by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period increased to include the number of additional shares of common stock that would have been outstanding if the potentially dilutive securities had been issued. Potentially dilutive securities include outstanding stock options, unvested restricted stock and unvested restricted stock awards. The dilutive effect of potentially dilutive securities is reflected in diluted net income per share by application of the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, an increase in the fair market value of the Company’s common stock can result in a greater dilutive effect from potentially dilutive securities. For any period where Net income (loss) attributable to First Data Corporation is presented, shares used in the diluted net income per share calculation represent basic shares because using diluted shares would be anti-dilutive.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts for prior years have been reclassified to conform with the current year financial statement presentation. During 2017, the Company revised its financial statements to reflect immaterial adjustments to its accounting for deferred income taxes. In the periods prior to 2015, the Company had incorrectly recorded deferred income tax assets on foreign currency translation adjustments included in other comprehensive income (loss) which the Company provided a full valuation. The adjustment resulted in a decrease of $88 million to the previously reported balances of "Accumulated Loss" and an offsetting increase to "Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)" at December 31, 2014, and a reduction to deferred tax assets and related valuation allowance of $124 million at December 31, 2016. Additionally, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 reflects a $102 million reclassification related to settlement activities to conform certain domestic and international businesses to the Company's global policies, which increased "Cash and cash equivalents" and decreased "Accounts receivable". The consolidated statements

74



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2016 reflects the reclassification of $102 million within “Net cash provided by operating activities”.

New Accounting Guidance
 
Revenue Recognition

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance that requires companies to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in amounts that reflect the consideration to which the companyCompany expects to be entitled to in an exchange for those goods or services. It also requires enhanced disclosures about revenue, provides guidance for transactions that were not previously addressed comprehensively, and improves guidance for multiple-element arrangements. The guidance appliesFASB has subsequently issued several amendments to any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contractsthe standard, including clarification on accounting for licenses, identifying performance obligations, and principal versus agent consideration (reporting revenue gross vs. net).

Since the issuance of ASC 606 and ASC 340-40 (collectively, the New Revenue Standard) in May 2014, the Company has been preparing for the transferadoption of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scopeNew Revenue Standard. The Company has been monitoring the activity of other standards.the FASB and the Transition Resource Group as it relates to specific industry interpretive guidance and further overall interpretations and clarifications. The Company has completed two phases of its three-phase plan to-adopt and implement of the New Revenue Standard. Phase III has begun and includes activities such as running parallel reporting for impacted areas under the New and Current Revenue Standard (ASC 605), recording the accounting adjustments that were identified in Phase II, and revising the Company’s financial statement disclosures. This final phase will be completed during Q1 2018.

The Company adopted the New Revenue Standard using a modified retrospective basis on January 1, 2018. The Company expects the adoption to result in a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings of less than $100 million to apply the New Revenue Standard. This impact was principally driven by certain software arrangements being recognized sooner; changes related to costs to obtain customers, including the related amortization period; and the release of deferred revenue associated with Clover terminals that had previously lacked standalone value. Under the modified retrospective basis, the Company will not restate the prior consolidated financial statements presented for these effects.

The Company currently expects the most significant ongoing impact of adopting the New Revenue Standard in 2018 to be driven by changes in principal versus agent considerations, with the majority of the change overall in total revenues attributable to FDC reflecting our PIN-debit and PINless debit transactions on a net basis prospectively, as opposed to our gross presentation of $3.2 billion in 2017. The Company does not expect the adoption of the New Revenue Standard to have a material impact on net income. The Company will include additional disclosures of the amount by which each financial statement line item is affected during 2018, as compared to the guidance that was in effect before the change, and an explanation of the reasons for significant changes.
Leases

In February 2016, the FASB issued guidance which requires lessees to put most leases on their balance sheets. The guidance also modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases for lessors and provides new presentation and disclosure requirements for both lessees and lessors. The standard is effective for public companiesfinancial statements issued for annual periodsfiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 as well as2018, and interim periods within those annual periods using either the full retrospective approach or modified retrospective approach.fiscal years. Early adoption is not permitted.permitted in any interim or annual period subsequent to adoption of the preceding revenue recognition guidance. The Company is currently evaluating the impactsimpact of adoption of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

Note 2: RestructuringStock-based Compensation

DuringIn March 2016, the years ended DecemberFASB issued guidance that will change some aspects of the accounting for stock-based payments to employees. Under the new guidance, companies will be required to record all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement and to present excess tax benefits as an operating activity on the statement of cash flows. The guidance may also change how companies account for forfeitures and an employee’s use of shares to satisfy the employer’s statutory income tax withholding obligation. The Company adopted the various amendments in its consolidated financial statements for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012,2017 with an effective date on January 1, 2017. The Company has elected to continue to estimate forfeitures expected to occur to determine the amount of compensation cost to be recognized in each period. The adoption of these amendments did not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements as the Company recorded restructuring charges in connection with management’s alignment of the business with strategic objectives and cost savings initiatives as well as refinements of estimates. During 2014 and 2013, the Company also recorded restructuring charges in connection with the departure of certain executive officers. Additionally in 2014 and 2012, the Company recorded restructuring charges related to certain relocation efforts instill had income tax valuation allowances within the U.S. and Germany, respectively. InThe Company released its U.S. valuation allowances in the fourth quarter of 2014,2017 and as a result the Company began an off-shoring initiative with an expected total cost between $50 million and $100 million to be completedcould experience volatility in 2017.its income tax expense.

In May 2017, the FASB issued guidance that will clarify when changes to terms or conditions of a stock-based payment award must be accounted for as a modification. Under the new guidance, companies will only apply modification accounting guidance

6275



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


A summaryif the value, vesting conditions or classification of an award changes. This new guidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 for all entities, including interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted. The guidance is adopted prospectively to awards modified on or after the adoption date. The Company will adopt the new guidance on January 1, 2018. The impact of adoption on the Company's consolidated financial statements is dependent on future changes to share-based compensation awards.
Credit Losses
In June 2016, the FASB issued guidance that will change the accounting for credit impairment. Under the new guidance, companies are required to measure all expected credit losses for financial instruments held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable supportable forecasts. This replaces the existing incurred loss model and is applicable to the measurement of credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost and applies to some off-balance sheet credit exposures. This new guidance will be effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
Statement of Cash Flows

In November 2016, the FASB issued guidance that will change the presentation of restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents on the statement of cash flows. Under the new guidance, companies will be required to include restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents with the cash and cash equivalents line item when reconciling beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. Given this change, transfers between cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash and cash equivalents will not be reported as cash flow activities on the statement of cash flows. In addition, the guidance requires entities to disclose information about the nature of restrictions on its cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash and cash equivalents. This new guidance will be effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The guidance should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. The Company adopted the new guidance on January 1, 2018. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Goodwill

In January 2017, the FASB issued guidance simplifying the test for goodwill impairment. This standard eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test, instead requiring an entity to recognize a goodwill impairment charge for the amount by which the goodwill carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. This guidance is effective for interim and annual goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and early adoption is permitted. This guidance must be applied on a prospective basis. The Company adopted the new guidance during the fourth quarter of 2017 with no impact to its consolidated financial statements.
Pension Costs

In March 2017, the FASB issued guidance that requires employers that sponsor defined benefit plans for pensions and/or other post-retirement benefits to present the service cost component of net pretax benefits (charges), incurred by segment,periodic benefit cost in the same income statement line item as other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. Only the service cost component will be eligible for each periodcapitalization in assets. Employers will present the other components of the net periodic benefit cost separately from the line item that includes the service cost and outside of any subtotal of operating income, if one is as follows:
  Merchant Financial   
All Other
and
  
(in millions) Solutions Services International Corporate Totals
Year ended December 31, 2014  
  
  
  
  
Restructuring charges $(3.1)
$(0.5)
$(0.3)
$(13.3) $(17.2)
Restructuring accrual reversals 1.0

0.2

1.5

1.3
 4.0
Restructuring, net $(2.1) $(0.3) $1.2
 $(12.0) $(13.2)
           
Year ended December 31, 2013  
  
  
  
  
Restructuring charges $(17.9) $(8.7) $(1.7) $(25.3) $(53.6)
Restructuring accrual reversals 2.2
 0.5
 1.6
 1.3
 5.6
Restructuring, net $(15.7) $(8.2) $(0.1) $(24.0) $(48.0)
           
Year ended December 31, 2012  
  
  
  
  
Restructuring charges $(7.5) $
 $(18.5) $(2.2) $(28.2)
Restructuring accrual reversals 1.0
 
 2.8
 1.3
 5.1
Restructuring, net $(6.5) $
 $(15.7) $(0.9) $(23.1)

presented. These components will not be eligible for capitalization in assets. This new guidance will be effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The following table summarizesCompany plans to adopt the Company’s utilizationguidance on January 1, 2018. Upon adoption, the guidance requires changes to the presentation of restructuring accruals for the years endedincome statement to be applied retrospectively. Had the Company adopted on January 1, 2017, the impact on our financial statements at December 31, 20132017 would have increased operating expense and 2014:decreased non-operating expense by less than $10 million.
  Employee Facility Closure
(in millions)  Severance and Other
Remaining accrual as of January 1, 2013 $13.1
 $
Expense provision 53.6
 
Cash payments and other (40.0) 
Changes in estimates (5.6) 
Remaining accrual as of December 31, 2013 21.1
 
Expense provision 16.2

1.0
Cash payments and other (21.8)

Changes in estimates (4.0)

Remaining accrual as of December 31, 2014 $11.5
 $1.0
Note 3: AcquisitionsDerivatives and Dispositions

2014 AcquisitionsHedging

In August 2014,2017, the Company acquired Gyft, Inc.,FASB issued guidance to simplify the current application of hedge accounting. This standard is intended to better align a leading digital platform that enables consumerscompany’s risk management strategies and financial reporting for hedging relationships through changes to buy, send, manage,both designation and redeem gift cards using mobile devices. The final purchase consideration will vary based on contingent consideration which will be determined based on salesmeasurement for qualifying hedging relationships and more accurately presenting the next three years. The acquisition is reported as part ofeconomic effects in the Merchant Solutions segment. Referfinancial statements. In addition, the new guidance establishes flexibility in the requirements to Note 9 "Commitmentsqualify and Contingencies" of these Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the liability for contingent consideration.maintain hedge

2014 Dispositions

On May 29, 2014, the Company completed the sale of its 30% minority interest in a transportation payments business, Electronic Funds Source LLC (EFS), which was reported as part of the Merchant Solutions segment. The Company recognized a gain on sale of $98 million recorded in “Other income (expense)” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, comprised of $264 million in cash reduced by its investment and associated deal costs of $166 million, and recorded an income tax provision of $7 million as a result of the final settlement of the sale.

6376



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


2013 Acquisitions
In October 2013, the Company acquired Perka Inc., a provider of a mobile marketing and consumer loyalty solution. The acquisition is reported as part of the Merchant Solutions segment. Refer to Note 9 "Commitments and Contingencies" of these Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the liability for contingent consideration.

2012 Acquisitions
In April 2012,accounting. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and for interim periods therein, with early adoption permitted. The Company will adopt the Company acquired the remaining 30% noncontrolling interest in Omnipay, which was paid for in approximately two equal installments during April 2012 and April 2013.

In December 2012, the Company acquired 100% of Clover Network, Inc., a provider of payment network services for total consideration of $54 million, net of cash acquired.new guidance on January 1, 2018. The transaction consisted of net cash consideration of $34 million as well as a series of contingent payments based on the achievement of specified sales targets. These contingent payments are classified as purchase consideration if made to outside investors and compensation if made to current and future employees. As part of the purchase price, the Company recorded a $20 million liability for the contingent consideration due to outside investors based upon the net present value of the Company’s estimate of the future payments. The acquisition is reported as part of the Merchant Solutions segment. Refer to Note 9 "Commitments and Contingencies" of these Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the liability for contingent consideration.
Note 4: Settlement Assets and Obligations
Settlement assets and obligations result from the Company’s processing services and associated settlement activities, including settlement of payment transactions. Settlement assets are generated principally from merchant services transactions. Certain merchant settlement assets that relate to settlement obligations accrued by us are held by partner banks to which the Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have legal ownership but has the right to use to satisfy the related settlement obligation. The Company records corresponding settlement obligations for amounts payable to merchants and for payment instruments not yet presented for settlement. The difference in the aggregate amount of such assets and liabilities is primarily due to unrealized net investment gains and losses, which are reported as OCI in equity.

The principal components ofa material impact on the Company’s settlement assets and obligations are as follows:consolidated financial statements.
Note 2: Borrowings
  As of December 31,
(in millions)  2014 2013
Settlement assets:  
  
Current settlement assets:  
  
Cash and cash equivalents $1,419.3
 $1,576.7
Investment securities 16.5
 71.2
Due from card associations and bank partners 5,220.1
 5,102.5
Due from merchants 899.0
 791.4
  7,554.9
 7,541.8
Long-term settlement assets:    
Investment securities 3.5
 15.2
  $7,558.4
 $7,557.0
Settlement obligations:    
Current settlement obligations:    
Payment instruments outstanding $82.4
 $164.1
Card settlements due to merchants 7,474.9
 7,389.3
  $7,557.3
 $7,553.4
  As of December 31,
(in millions)
2017 2016
Short-term borrowings:
 
  
Foreign lines of credit and other arrangements
$205
 $84
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility June 2, 2020 at LIBOR plus 3.50% or a base rate plus 2.50% 272
 
Receivable securitized loan at LIBOR plus 1.5% or a base rate equal to the highest of (i) the applicable lender's prime rate, or (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%
600
 160
Unamortized deferred financing costs(a)
 (3) (2)
Total short-term borrowings 1,074
 242
Current portion of long-term borrowings:
   
Senior secured term loan facility due June 2020 at LIBOR plus 1.75% or a base rate plus 0.75%
78
 
Other arrangements and capital lease obligations 119
 116
Total current portion of long-term borrowings 197
 116
Total short-term and current portion of long-term borrowings 1,271
 358
Long-term borrowings:
   
Senior secured term loan facility due April 2024 at LIBOR plus 2.25% or a base rate plus 1.25%
3,892
 
Senior secured term loan facility due July 2022 at LIBOR plus 2.25% or a base rate plus 1.25%
3,758
 
Senior secured term loan facility due June 2020 at LIBOR plus 1.75% or a base rate plus 0.75% 1,404
 
Senior secured term loan facility due March 2021 at LIBOR and euro LIBOR plus 3.0% or, solely with respect to U.S. dollar-denominated term loans, a base rate plus 2.0% 
 4,379
Senior secured term loan facility due July 2022 at LIBOR plus 3.0% or a base rate plus 2.0%, or solely with respect to euro-denominated term loans, euro LIBOR plus 3.25% 
 3,583
6.75% Senior secured first lien notes due 2020

 1,398
5.375% Senior secured first lien notes due 2023
1,210
 1,210
5.0% Senior secured first lien notes due 2024
1,900
 1,900
5.75% Senior secured second lien notes due 2024
2,200
 2,200
7.0% Senior unsecured notes due 2023 3,400
 3,400
Unamortized discount and unamortized deferred financing costs (a)

(123) (154)
Other arrangements and capital lease obligations
286
 215
Total long-term borrowings (b)
 17,927
 18,131
Total borrowings (c)
 $19,198
 $18,489
(a)Unamortized deferred financing costs and certain lenders' fees associated with debt transactions were capitalized as discounts are amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the remaining term of the respective debt.
(b)As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the fair value of the Company's long-term borrowings was $18.2 billion and $18.8 billion, respectively. The estimated fair value of the Company's long-term borrowings was primarily based on market trading prices and is considered to be a Level 2 measurement.
(c)The effective interest rate is not substantially different than the coupon rate on any of the Company's debt tranches.


The changes in settlement assets and obligations are presented on a net basis within operating activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. However, because the changes in the settlement assets balance exactly offset changes in settlement obligations, the activity nets to zero. 

6477



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Note 5: Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company enters into the following types of derivatives:

Interest rate contracts:

Interest rate swaps: The Company uses interest rate swaps to mitigate the exposure to interest rate fluctuations on interest payments related to variable rate debt. The Company uses these contracts in non-qualifying hedging relationships.

Fixed to floating interest rate swaps: The Company uses fixed to floating interest rate swaps to maintain a desired ratio of fixed rate and floating rate debt. The Company uses these contracts in non-qualifying hedging relationships.

Foreign exchange contracts: The Company uses cross-currency swaps to protect the net investment in certain foreign subsidiaries and/or affiliates with respect to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company uses these contracts in both qualifying and non-qualifying hedging relationships.

The Company held the following derivative instruments as of the dates indicated:
 
 
 As of December 31,
  2014 2013
(in millions) Notional Currency Notional Value Assets (a) Liabilities (a) Notional Currency Notional Value Assets (a) Liabilities (a)
Derivatives designated as hedges of net investments in foreign operations:      
  
    
  
  
Foreign exchange contracts AUD 260.0
 $41.1
 $
 AUD 215.0
 $15.4
 $(15.7)
Foreign exchange contracts EUR 200.0
 26.3
 
 EUR 200.0
 
 (6.0)
Foreign exchange contracts GBP 250.0
 18.0
 
 GBP 100.0
 
 (8.6)
Foreign exchange contracts CAD 110.0
 9.3
 
 CAD 75.0
 1.5
 
      94.7
 
     16.9
 (30.3)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:      
  
      
  
Interest rate contracts USD 5,750.0
 47.3
 (104.9) USD 5,750.0
 47.2
 (119.8)
Foreign exchange contracts EUR 21.5
 0.7
 
 EUR 21.5
 
 (2.9)
      48.0
 (104.9)     47.2
 (122.7)
      $142.7
 $(104.9)     $64.1
 $(153.0)
(a)Of the balances included in the table above, in aggregate, $142 million of assets and $96 million of liabilities, net $46 million, as of December 31, 2014 and $64 million of assets and $125 million of liabilities, net $61 million, as of December 31, 2013 are subject to master netting agreements to the extent that the swaps are with the same counterparty. The terms of those agreements require that the Company net settle the outstanding positions at the option of the counterparty upon certain events of default.

The maximum length of time over which the Company is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions excluding those forecasted transactions related to the payment of variable interest on existing financial instruments is through January 2018.

Fair Value Measurement

The carrying amounts for the Company's Derivative financial instruments are the estimated fair value of the financial instruments. The Company’s derivatives are not exchange listed and therefore the fair value is estimated under an income approach using Bloomberg analytics models that are based on readily observable market inputs. These models reflect the contractual terms of the derivatives, such as notional value and expiration date, as well as market-based observables including interest and foreign currency exchange rates, yield curves, and the credit quality of the counterparties. The models also incorporate the Company’s creditworthiness in order to appropriately reflect non-performance risk. Inputs to the derivative pricing models are generally observable and do not contain a high level of subjectivity and, accordingly, the Company’s derivatives were classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. While the Company believes its estimates result in a

65



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


reasonable reflection of the fair value of these instruments, the estimated values may not be representative of actual values that could have been realized or that will be realized in the near future.

Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations

Derivative gains and (losses) were as follows for the periods indicated:
  Year ended December 31,
  2014 2013 2012
(in millions, pretax) 
Interest
 Rate
 Contracts
 
Foreign
 Exchange
 Contracts
 
Interest
 Rate
 Contracts
 
Foreign
 Exchange
 Contracts
 
Interest
 Rate
 Contracts
 
Foreign
 Exchange
 Contracts
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships(a):
  
  
  
  
  
  
Gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated OCI into Interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations $
 $
 $
 $
 $(114.9) $
Derivatives in net investment hedging relationships:  
  
  
  
  
  
Gain (loss) recognized in OCI (effective portion) $
 $79.8
 $
 $14.2
 $
 $(9.2)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments  
  
  
  
  
  
Gain (loss) recognized in Other income (expense) in the Consolidated Statements of Operations $(3.4) $3.7
 $(22.7) $(1.7) $(89.9) $(1.5)
(a)No gain (loss) recognized in Consolidated Statements of Operations due to ineffectiveness.
Accumulated Derivative Gains and Losses
The following table summarizes activity in other comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 related to derivative instruments classified as cash flow hedges and a net investment hedge held by the Company:
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions, after tax) 2014 2013 2012
Accumulated loss included in other comprehensive income (loss) at beginning of the period $(12.3) $(21.1) $(87.6)
Less: Reclassifications into earnings from other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax 
 
 72.2
  (12.3) (21.1) (15.4)
Increase (decrease) in fair value of derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting (a) 49.6
 8.8
 (5.7)
Accumulated gain (loss) included in other comprehensive income (loss) at end of the period $37.3
 $(12.3) $(21.1)
(a)Gains and (losses) are included in “Unrealized gains on hedging activities” and in “Foreign currency translation adjustment” on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

66



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Note 6: Borrowings
 
As of December 31,
(in millions)
2014
2013
Short-term borrowings
 

 
Foreign lines of credit and other arrangements
$68.1

$68.7
Senior secured revolving credit facility 9.6
 
Total Short-term borrowings
77.7

68.7







Current portion of long-term borrowings:
 

 
4.85% Unsecured notes due 2014, net of unamortized discount of $0.1


3.7
4.95% Unsecured notes due 2015, net of unamortized discount of $0.2
9.6


Capital lease obligations
73.5

73.9
Total Current portion of long-term borrowings
83.1

77.6
Total Short-term and current portion of long-term borrowings
160.8

146.3
     
Long-term borrowings:
 

 
Senior secured term loan facility due March 2017, net of unamortized discount of $10.1 and $23.3
1,451.1

2,657.8
Senior secured term loan facility due March 2018 (a), net of unamortized discount of $44.9 and $22.1
4,931.6

4,655.6
Senior secured term loan facility due September 2018 (a), net of unamortized discount of $27.3 and $27.5
980.7

980.5
Senior secured term loan facility due March 2021, net of unamortized discount of $10.5
1,179.9


7.375% Senior secured first lien notes due 2019, net of unamortized discount of $18.7 and $22.9
1,576.3

1,572.1
8.875% Senior secured first lien notes due 2020, net of unamortized discount of $10.0 and $11.8
500.0

498.2
6.75% Senior secured first lien notes due 2020 (b), net of unamortized discount of $14.3 and $25.7
1,383.2

2,124.3
8.25% Senior secured second lien notes due 2021, net of unamortized discount of $10.7 and $12.5
1,989.0

1,987.2
8.75% Senior secured second lien notes due 2022, net of unamortized discount of $5.7 and $6.5
994.3

993.5
12.625% Senior unsecured notes due 2021, net of unamortized discount of $16.1 and $18.8
2,983.9

2,981.2
10.625% Senior unsecured notes due 2021 (b), net of unamortized discount of $15.5 and $27.4
514.3

787.6
11.25% Senior unsecured notes due 2021 (b), net of unamortized discount of $15.1 and $27.0
495.1

758.0
11.25% Senior unsecured subordinated notes due 2016


750.0
11.75% Senior unsecured subordinated notes due 2021 (b), net of unamortized discount of $10.9 and $38.0
1,597.8

1,712.0
4.95% Unsecured notes due 2015, net of unamortized discount of $0.6


9.2
Capital lease obligations
134.2

89.6
Total Long-term borrowings
20,711.4

22,556.8
Total Borrowings
$20,872.2

$22,703.1
(a)Repriced and amended on July 18, 2014. See "Senior Secured Term Loan Facility" below for additional information.
(b)Partially redeemed with proceeds of private placement on July 11, 2014 and July 21, 2014. See "Debt Repurchase" below for additional information.



67



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Foreign Lines of Credit and Other Arrangements

FDCAs of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had approximately $349$546 million and $265$489 million, respectively, available under short-term lines of credit and other arrangements with foreign banks and alliance partners primarily to fund settlement activity, as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.activity. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had2017 and 2016, this includes a $150$355 million committed line of credit for one of our U.S. alliances and the Company's consolidated alliances. The remainder of these arrangements isare primarily associated with international operations and are in various functional currencies, the most significant of which are the Australian dollar, the Polish zloty, and the euro. Of the amounts outstanding as of December 31, 20142017 and 2013, $672016, $15 million and $69$10 million, respectively, were uncommitted. The weighted averageweighted-average interest rate associated with these arrangementsforeign lines of credit was 3.2%2.9% and 3.8%2.6% for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively. Commitment fees for the committed lines of credit range from 0.16% to 0.8%.

Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility

As of December 31, 2014, FDC’sThe Company has a $1.25 billion senior secured revolving credit facility had commitments from financial institutions to provide approximately $1.0 billion of credit. The revolving credit facility maturesmaturing on September 24, 2016. FDC had $10 million and $0 million outstanding against this facility as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.June 2, 2020. Up to $500$250 million of the senior secured revolving credit facility is available for letters of credit, of which $43$29 million and $46$41 million of letters of credit were issued under the facilityfacilities as of December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively. As of December 31, 2014, $9642017, $949 million remained available.
Interest on the senior secured revolving credit facility is payable at a rate equal to, at FDC’sCompany’s option, either (a) London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR)LIBOR for deposits in the applicable currency plus an applicable margin3.50% or (b) the higher of (1) the prime rate of Credit Suisse and (2) the federal funds effectivesolely with respect to revolving loans denominated in U.S. dollars, a base rate plus 0.50%, plus an applicable margin.2.50%. The weighted-average interest rate on these facilities was 5.14%5.74% and 5.25%4.60% for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively. The commitment fee rate for the unused portion of thisthe facility is 0.75%0.50% per year.year, though it may be reduced by the Company’s leverage ratio.

Receivable Securitization Agreement

The Company has a consolidated wholly-owned subsidiary, First Data Receivables, LLC (FDR).  FDR and FDC entered into an agreement where certain wholly owned subsidiaries of FDC agreed to transfer and contribute receivables to FDR. FDR’s assets are not available to satisfy obligations of any other entities or affiliates of FDC. FDR's creditors will be entitled, upon its liquidation, to be satisfied out of FDR’s assets prior to any assets or value in FDR becoming available to FDR’s equity holders. As of December 31, 2017, the Company transferred $748 million in receivables to FDR as part of the securitization program and FDR utilized the receivables as collateral in borrowings of $600 million. As of December 31, 2017, the receivables held by FDR are recorded within “Accounts receivable, net” in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The weighted-average interest rate on the securitization facility was 2.8% for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Senior Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility

On December 14, 2017 the Company executed a $33 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility maturing December 20, 2019, available for letters of credit. The interest rate associated with the credit facility was 1.85% for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Senior Secured Term Loan Facility

The Company has amounts outstanding under itsoriginal terms of the Company’s senior secured term loan facility under separate tranches as described below. A portion of each tranche is denominated in euro with the exception of the September 2018 term loan. Interest is payable based upon LIBOR or euro LIBOR plus an applicable margin.
As of December 31, 2014, FDC held interest rate swaps to mitigate exposure to variability in interest payments on the outstanding variable rate senior secured term loan. Refer to Note 5 "Derivative Financial Instruments" of these Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the Company’s derivatives.
The original terms of FDC’s senior secured term loan facilityfacilities required the Company to pay equal quarterly installments in aggregate annual amounts equal to 1% of the original principal amount. However, in conjunction with debt modifications and amendments over the last several years, proceeds from the issuance of the notes were used to prepay portions of the principal balances of FDC’sthe Company’s senior secured term loans which satisfied the future quarterly principal payments. Therefore, the Company made no scheduled principal payments during 20142017 or 2013.
2016, for the senior secured term loan facility other than $70 million related to June 2020 senior secured term loan facility. The senior secured term loan facilityfacilities also requiresrequire mandatory prepayments based on a percentage of excess cash flow generated by FDC.the Company if the Company does not satisfy the leverage ratio. All obligations under the senior secured loan facilityfacilities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by most of the domestic, wholly owned material subsidiaries of FDC,the Company, subject to certain exceptions.

Senior Secured Term Loan Facility Due March 2017 June 2020

On January 30, 2014,23, 2017, the Company amended its senior secured term loan facility (2017 Old Term Loan). Under the amendment, the Company extended the maturity of approximately $941 million of its existing U.S. dollar-denominated term loans and approximately €154 million of its existing euro-denominated term loans, in each case, from March 24, 2017 to March 24, 2021. See the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility Due March 2021 (2021 Term Loan) section below.
The Company also incurred an aggregate principal amount of approximately $1.4$1.3 billion in new U.S. dollar-denominated term loans and approximately €25 million in new euro-denominateddollar denominated term loans maturing on March 24, 2017 (2017 New Term Loan).June 2, 2020. The interest rate applicable to the 2017 New Term Loan is a rate equal to, at the Company’s option, either (a) LIBOR for deposits in the applicable currency plus 350 basis points or (b) solely with respect tonew term loans denominated in U.S. dollars,is either LIBOR plus 1.75% or a base rate plus 250 basis points.0.75%. The Company usedis required to make quarterly principal payments of 1.25% on the proceeds from the incurrencenew term loans. The new term loans were utilized to pay down a portion of the existing 6.75% senior secured first lien notes. In connection with this transaction, the Company expensed $56 million in loss on debt extinguishment. In November 2017, New Term Loan to repay anthe Company incurred additional debt of

6878



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


equal amount outstanding on$250 million against this facility to partially fund the 2017 Old Term Loan.purchase of BluePay. The interest rate on the 2017 Old Term Loan was a rate per annum equal to, at the Company's option, LIBOR plus 400 basis points or a base rate plus 300 basis points.Company made principal payments of $70 million in 2017.
Additionally, the Company incurred an aggregate principal amount of approximately $63 million under the 2021 Term Loan and used the proceeds to repay an equal amount outstanding on the 2017 Old Term Loan.
Senior Secured Term Loan Facility Due March 2018 April 2024

On July 18, 2014,November 15, 2017, the Company incurred an aggregate principal amountrefinanced approximately $3.9 billion of approximately $4.6 billion in new U.S. dollar-denominated loans and approximately €311 million in new euro-denominatedsenior secured term loans maturing on March 24, 2018 (March 2018 New Term Loan).April 2024. The interest rate applicable to the March 2018 New Term Loannew loan is a rate equal to, at the Company’s option, either (a) LIBOR for deposits in the applicable currency plus 350 basis points or (b) solely with respect to term loans denominated in U.S. dollars, a base rate plus 250 basis points. The Company used a portion of the proceeds from the incurrence of the March 2018 New Term Loan to repay its outstanding term loans borrowings maturing on March 24, 2018 (March 2018 Old Term Loan), with approximately $350 million in remaining aggregate principal amount of 2018 March New Term Loan to be used for general corporate purposes. The interest rate on the March 2018 Old Term Loan was a rate per annum equal to, at the Company's option, LIBOR plus 400 basis points2.25% or a base rate plus 300 basis points.1.25%. The proceeds were utilized to pay down the existing March 2021 term loan facility. In connection with this transaction, the Company expensed $9 million in loss on debt extinguishment.

Senior Secured Term Loan Facility Due September 2018 July 2022

On July 18, 2014,June 14, 2017, the Company incurred an aggregate principal amountrefinanced approximately $2.7 billion of U.S. dollar-denominated senior secured term loans maturing on July 2022 and paid off approximately $1.0 billion in newof euro-denominated senior secured term loans maturing on March 2021 and July 2022. The U.S. dollar-denominated July 2022 term loan facility was upsized by $1.0 billion, to pay off the euro-denominated term loans. Post transaction, the U.S. dollar-denominated July 2022 term loan facility approximates $3.8 billion of U.S. dollar-denominated term loans maturing on September 24, 2018 (September 2018 New Term Loan). TheJuly 2022 at an interest rate applicable to the September 2018 New Term Loan is a rate equal to, at the Company’s option, either (a) LIBOR for the deposits in U.S. dollars plus 350 basis points or (b) a base rate plus 250 basis points. The Company used the proceeds from the incurrence of the September 2018 New Term Loan to repay outstanding U.S. dollar-denominated term loan borrowings maturing on September 24, 2018 (September 2018 Old Term Loan). The interest rate on the September 2018 Old Term Loan was a rate per annum equal to, at the Company's option, LIBOR plus 400 basis points2.25% or a base rate plus 300 basis points.1.25%. In connection with this transaction, the Company expensed $9 million in loss on debt extinguishment and $4 million in debt issuance costs.

Senior Secured Term Loan Facility Due March 2021 As discussed above, on January 30, 2014, the Company amended its 2017 Old Term Loan. Under the amendment, the Company extended the maturity of approximately $941 million of its existing U.S. dollar-denominated term loans and approximately €154 million of its existing euro-denominated term loans, in each case, from March 24, 2017 to March 24, 2021.
The Company also incurred an aggregate principal amount of approximately $63 million in new U.S. dollar-denominated term loans maturing on March 24, 2021 and used the proceeds to repay an equal amount outstanding on the 2017 Old Term Loan.

The interest rate applicable to the 2021 Term Loan is a rate equal to, at the Company’s option, either (a) LIBOR for deposits in the applicable currency plus 400 basis points or (b) solely with respect to term loans denominated in U.S. dollars, a base rate plus 300 basis points. 

7.375%5.375% Senior Secured First Lien Notes

FDC’s 7.375%On August 11, 2015, the Company issued approximately $1.2 billion aggregate principal amount of 5.375% senior secured first lien notes due JuneAugust 15, 2019 require2023. Interest on the payment of interestnotes will be payable semi-annually in cash each year, commencing on JuneFebruary 15, and December 15 of each year.
FDC2016. The Company may redeem thesethe notes, in whole or in part, at any time prior to JuneAugust 15, 20152018 at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date and a make-whole premium."make-whole premium". Thereafter, FDCthe Company may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at established redemption prices.

8.875%5.0% Senior Secured First Lien Notes

FDC’s 8.875%On March 29, 2016, the Company issued additional $900 million aggregate principal amount to the existing $1.0 billion principal amount issued November 25, 2015 of 5.0% senior secured first lien notes due August 15, 2020 require the payment of interest semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 of each year.
FDC2024. The Company may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at any time prior to AugustJanuary 15, 20152019 at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date and an additional premium as defined. Thereafter, FDC may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at established redemption prices, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date.


69



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


6.75% Senior Secured First Lien Notes
On July 21, 2014, the Company redeemed $753 million aggregate principal of its 6.75% senior secured first lien notes due 2020, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Refer to "Debt Repurchase" below for additional information.

FDC’s 6.75% senior secured notes due November 1, 2020 require the payment of interest semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 of each year.
FDC may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at any time prior to November 1, 2015, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date and a “make-whole premium.”"make-whole premium". Thereafter, FDCthe Company may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at established redemption prices.

5.75% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes

On November 25, 2015, the Company issued $2.2 billion aggregate principal amount of 5.75% senior secured second lien notes due January 15, 2024. Interest on the 8.25% cash-pay notes is payable in cash and is payable semi-annually in arrearscash on January 15 and July 15.15 of each year. The 8.25% cash-pay notes mature on January 15, 2021.

Interest on the 8.75% senior secured second lien notes is payable in cash and is payable semi-annually in arrears on January 15 and July 15. The 8.75% senior secured second lien notes mature on January 15, 2022.
FDC may redeem the second lien notes, in whole or in part, at any time prior to January 15, 2016, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date and a “make-whole premium.” Thereafter, FDC may redeem the second lien notes, in whole or in part, at established redemption prices.

12.625% Senior Unsecured Notes
Interest on the 12.625% senior notes is payable in cash and is payable semi-annually in arrears on January 15 and July 15. The 12.625% senior notes mature on January 15, 2021.
FDC may redeem the senior unsecured notes, in whole or in part, at any time prior to January 15, 2016, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date and a “make-whole premium.” Thereafter, FDC may redeem the senior notes, in whole or in part, at established redemption prices.

10.625% Senior Unsecured Notes Due 2021
On March 14, 2014, the Company completed an offer to exchange all of its 10.625% senior unsecured notes due 2021 for publicly tradable notes having substantially identical terms and guarantees, except that the exchange notes are freely tradable. There was no expenditure or receipt of cash associated with this exchange, other than the professional fees incurred in connection with the registration statement itself.

On July 21, 2014, the Company redeemed $285 million aggregate principal of its 10.625% senior unsecured notes due 2021, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Refer to "Debt Repurchase" below for additional information.

Interest on the 10.625% senior notes is payable in cash and is payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15. The 10.625% senior notes mature on June 15, 2021.
FDC may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at any time prior to AprilJanuary 15, 2016,2019 at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date and a “make-whole premium.”"make-whole premium". Thereafter, FDCthe Company may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at established redemption prices.

11.25%7.0% Senior Unsecured Notes Due 20212023

On March 14, 2014,November 18, 2015, the Company completed an offer to exchange allissued $3.4 billion aggregate principal amount of its 11.25%7.0% senior unsecured notes due 2021 for publicly tradable notes having substantially identical terms and guarantees, except that the exchange notes are freely tradable. There was no expenditure or receipt of cash associated with this exchange, other than the professional fees incurred in connection with the registration statement itself.


70



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


On July 21, 2014, the Company redeemed $275 million aggregate principal of its 11.25% senior unsecured notes due 2021, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Refer to "Debt Repurchase" below for additional information.

December 1, 2023. Interest on the 11.25% senior notes is payable semi-annually in cash on June 1 and is payable semi-annually on May 15 and November 15.December 1 of each year. The 11.25% senior notes mature on January 15, 2021.

FDCCompany may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at any time prior to January 15, 2016,December 1, 2018 at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date and a “make-whole premium.”"make-whole premium". Thereafter, FDCthe Company may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at established redemption prices.

11.25% Senior Unsecured Subordinated Notes Due 2016
On January 6, 2014, the Company used proceeds from the issuance of its 11.75% senior unsecured subordinated notes due 2021, described below, together with cash on hand, to purchase for cash any and all outstanding 11.25% senior unsecured subordinated notes due 2016.

11.75% Senior Unsecured Subordinated Notes Due 2021
On January 6, 2014, FDC issued $725 million aggregate principal amount of 11.75% senior unsecured subordinated notes due August 15, 2021. The notes were issued at 103.5% of par for a premium of $25 million. The additional notes were treated as a single series with the existing 11.75% notes and will have the same terms as those of the existing 11.75% notes. The additional notes and the existing 11.75% notes will vote as one class under the indenture. FDC used the proceeds from the issue and sale of the additional notes, together with cash on hand, to redeem all of its outstanding 11.25% senior subordinated notes due 2016 and to pay related fees and expenses.

On March 14, 2014, the Company completed an offer to exchange all of its 11.75% senior unsecured notes due 2021 for publicly tradable notes having substantially identical terms and guarantees, except that the exchange notes are freely tradable. There was no expenditure or receipt of cash associated with this exchange, other than the professional fees incurred in connection with the registration statement itself.

On July 11, 2014, the Company redeemed $866 million aggregate principal of its 11.75% senior unsecured subordinated notes due 2021, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Refer to "Debt Repurchase" below for additional information.
Interest on the 11.75% senior notes is payable in cash and is payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15. The 11.75% senior notes mature on August 15, 2021.

FDC may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at any time prior to May 15, 2016, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date and a “make-whole premium.” Thereafter, FDC may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at established redemption prices.
Other
In October 2014, FDC paid off its 4.85% notes due 2014 for $4 million.

Related Financing Costs

In connection with the January 2014 debt offering and repurchase and the January 2014 and July 2014 modifications to the senior secured term loan facility, the Company incurred lender fees and other expenses of approximately $19 million.

Debt Repurchase

On July 11, 2014, First Data Holdings Inc., the direct parent company of the Company, completed a $3.5 billion issuance of its common equity in a private placement. $2.5 billion of the net proceeds were contributed to the Company as a capital contribution and the funds were used to repurchase a portion of the Company's outstanding 11.75% senior unsecured subordinated notes due 2021, 6.75% senior secured first lien notes due 2020, 10.625% senior unsecured notes due 2021, and 11.25% senior unsecured notes due 2021.

In connection with these transactions, the Company incurred debt extinguishment costs of $260 million.

7179



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Maturities

The following table presents the future aggregate annual maturities of the Company’s capital leases and long-term debt excluding unamortized discounts:
discounts and deferred financing cost:
Year ended December 31,
(in millions)
Par Amount Par Amount
2015$83.3
201666.4
20171,512.2
20185,992.0
 $197
20191,596.5
 228
2020 1,404
2021 37
2022 3,759
Thereafter11,754.1
 12,622
Total$21,004.5
 $18,247

Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs were capitalized in conjunction with certain of FDC’s debt issuances and totaled $132 million and $177 million, as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Deferred financing costs are reported in the “Other long-term assets” line of the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are being amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the interest method, over the remaining term of the respective debt, with a weighted-average period of six years. In addition, lender fees associated with debt modifications and amendments were capitalized as discounts on the debt and are similarly being amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the remaining term of the respective debt.

Guarantees and Covenants

All obligations under the senior secured revolving credit facility and senior secured term loan facilityfacilities are unconditionally guaranteed by most of the existing and future, direct and indirect, wholly owned, material domestic subsidiaries of FDC.the Company. The senior secured facilities contain a number of covenants that, among other things, restrict FDC’sthe Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness; create liens; enter into sale and leaseback transactions; engage in mergers or consolidations; sell or transfer assets; pay dividends and distributions or repurchase FDC’s or its parent company’sthe Company’s capital stock; make investments, loans or advances; prepay certain indebtedness; make certain acquisitions; engage in certain transactions with affiliates; amend material agreements governing certain indebtedness; and change its lines of business. The senior secured facilities also require FDCthe Company to not exceed a maximum senior secured leverage ratio and contain certain customary affirmative covenants and events of default, including a change of control. The senior secured term loan facilityfacilities also requiresrequire mandatory prepayments based on a percentage of excess cash flow generated by FDC. FDCthe Company. The Company is in compliance with all applicable covenants.

All senior secured notes are guaranteed on a senior secured basis by each of FDC’sthe Company’s existing and future direct and indirect wholly owned domestic subsidiaries that guarantees FDC’sthe Company’s senior secured credit facilities. Each of the guarantees of the notes is a general senior obligation of each guarantor and rank senior in right of payment to all existing and future subordinated indebtedness of the guarantor subsidiary, including FDC’sthe Company’s existing senior subordinated notes. The notes rank equal in right of payment with all existing and future senior indebtedness of the guarantor subsidiary but are effectively senior to the guarantees of FDC’sthe Company’s existing senior unsecured notes and FDC’sthe Company’s existing senior secured second lien notes to the extent of FDC’sthe Company’s and the guarantor subsidiary’s value of the collateral securing the notes. The 7.375% Senior Secured First Lien Notes, 8.875% Senior Secured First Lien Notes,5.375% senior secured first lien notes and 6.75% Senior Secured First Lien Notes5.0% senior secured first lien notes are effectively equal in right of payment with each other and the guarantees of FDC’sthe Company’s senior secured credit facilities. Each series of notes are effectively subordinated to any obligations secured by liens permitted under the indenture for the particular series of notes and structurally subordinated to any existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities of any subsidiary of a guarantor that is not also a guarantor of the notes.

All senior unsecured notes (i) rank senior in right of payment to all of FDC’sthe Company’s existing and future subordinated indebtedness, (ii) rank equally in right of payment to all of the existing and future senior indebtedness, (iii) are effectively subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future secured debt to the extent of the value of the assets securing such debt, and (iv) are structurally subordinated to all obligations of each subsidiary that is not a guarantor of the senior notes.

72



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The senior subordinated notes are unsecured and (i) rank equally in right of payment with all of the existing and future senior subordinated debt; (ii) rank senior in right of payment to all future debt and other obligations that are, by their terms, expressly subordinated in right of payment to the senior subordinated notes; (iii) are effectively subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future secured debt to the extent of the value of the assets securing such debt; (iv) are subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness; and (v) are structurally subordinated to all obligations of each subsidiary that is not a guarantor of the senior subordinated notes.
The notes are similarly guaranteed in accordance with their terms by each of FDC’s domestic subsidiaries that guarantee obligations under FDC’s senior secured term loan facility described in more detail in Note 17 "Supplemental Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements" of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
All obligations under the senior secured first lien notes, senior secured second lien notes, senior unsecured notes, and senior unsecured subordinated notes also contain a number of covenants similar to those described for the senior secured obligations noted above. FDCThe Company is in compliance with all applicable covenants. 

Fair Value Measurement
80

As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the fair value of the Company's long-term borrowings was $22.1 billion and $24.0 billion, respectively. The estimated fair value of the Company's long-term borrowings was primarily based on market trading prices and is considered to be a Level 2 measurement.

FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Note 7: Supplemental Financial Information3: Goodwill and Other Intangibles
Supplemental Statements of Operations Information

The following table detailspresents changes to goodwill for the components of “Other income (expense)” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations:years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017:
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions)  2014 2013 2012
Investment gains and (losses) $100.2
 $2.4
 $(7.7)
Derivative financial instruments gains and (losses) 0.3
 (24.4) (91.4)
Divestitures, net 1.6
 (5.4) 
Non-operating foreign currency gains and (losses) 59.1
 (19.5) 4.8
Other income (expense) $161.2
 $(46.9) $(94.3)
(in millions) Global Business Solutions Global Financial
Solutions
 Network & Security Solutions Totals
Balance as of January 1, 2016  
  
  
  
Goodwill $15,567
 $2,054
 $2,284
 $19,905
Accumulated impairment losses (1,363) (683) (1,013) (3,059)
  14,204
 1,371
 1,271
 16,846
Acquisitions 5
 
 
 5
Dispositions (25) 
 
 (25)
Other adjustments (primarily foreign currency) (42) (88) 
 (130)
Balance as of December 31, 2016  
  
  
  
Goodwill 15,505
 1,966
 2,284
 19,755
Accumulated impairment losses (1,363) (683) (1,013) (3,059)
  14,142
 1,283
 1,271
 16,696
Acquisitions 875
 
 
 875
Dispositions 
 (17) (48) (65)
Other adjustments (primarily foreign currency) 104
 100
 
 204
Balance as of December 31, 2017  
  
  
  
Goodwill 16,484
 2,049
 2,236
 20,769
Accumulated impairment losses (1,363) (683) (1,013) (3,059)
  $15,121
 $1,366
 $1,223
 $17,710


The intangible amortization expense associated with customer relationships and other intangibles, including amortization associated with investments in affiliates, was as follows for the periods indicated:
73
Year ended December 31,  
(in millions)  Amount
2017 $752
2016 761
2015 843

The carrying value of the First Data trade name is $604 million for both the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Upon consideration of many factors, including the determination that there are no legal, regulatory or contractual provisions that limit the useful life of the First Data trade name, the Company determined that the First Data trade name had an indefinite useful life. The Company also considered the effects of obsolescence, demand, competition, other economic factors, and its ability to maintain and protect the trade name without significant expenditures. The First Data trade name is expected to contribute directly or indirectly to the future cash flows of the Company for an indefinite period. As an indefinite lived asset, the First Data trade name is not amortized but is reviewed annually for impairment until such time as it is determined to have a finite life. The First Data trade name was not impaired as of December 31, 2017 or 2016.


81



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Supplemental Balance Sheet InformationThe following table provides the components of other intangibles:
 
As of December 31,
(in millions)
2014
2013
Other current assets:
 

 
Prepaid expenses
$74.8

$142.2
Inventory
90.3

86.7
Other
123.7

116.2
Total Other current assets
$288.8

$345.1
  As of December 31,
  2017 2016
    Accumulated 
Net of
Accumulated
   Accumulated 
Net of
Accumulated
(in millions)  Cost Amortization Amortization Cost Amortization Amortization
Customer relationships $8,124
 $(5,940) $2,184
 $7,399
 $(5,660) $1,739
             
Other intangibles:  
  
  
  
  
  
Conversion costs $302
 $(142) $160
 $248
 $(109) $139
Contract costs 324
 (179) 145
 306
 (149) 157
Software 2,552
 (1,920) 632
 2,236
 (1,726) 510
Other, including trade names 1,422
 (424) 998
 1,375
 (381) 994
Total other intangibles $4,600
 $(2,665) $1,935
 $4,165
 $(2,365) $1,800

The estimated future aggregate amortization expense for the next five years is as follows:
Property and equipment:
 

 
Land
$83.1

$85.0
Buildings
341.5

325.9
Leasehold improvements
55.4

54.2
Equipment and furniture
1,289.4

1,164.3
Equipment under capital lease
393.4

369.9
Property and equipment
2,162.8

1,999.3
Less: Accumulated depreciation
(1,233.1)
(1,149.9)
Total Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
$929.7

$849.4







Other current liabilities:
 

 
Accrued interest expense
$442.9

$538.8
Other accrued expenses
559.2

529.4
Other
530.1

562.3
Total Other current liabilities
$1,532.2

$1,630.5
Year ended December 31,  
(in millions) 
Amount (a)
2018 $705
2019 615
2020 530
2021 399
2022 310
(a) Actual amortization expense will be higher due to future activity that generates new intangible balances.

The Company tests contract and conversion costs for recoverability on an annual basis by comparing the remaining expected undiscounted cash flows under the contract to the net book value. Any assets that are determined to be unrecoverable are written down to their fair value. In addition to this annual test, these assets and all other long lived assets are tested for impairment upon an indicator of potential impairment.
Note 8: Related Party Transactions4: Stock Compensation Plans

Merchant Alliances
The Company provides stock-based compensation awards to its employees under the 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (stock plan). The total number of shares of Class A substantial portioncommon stock that may be issued under the stock plan is 71 million, plus any shares of Class B common stock subject to outstanding awards granted under the Company's 2007 Equity Plan that are forfeited, terminated, canceled, expired unexercised, withheld in payment of the Company’s business within the Merchant Solutions and International segments is conducted through merchant alliances. Merchant alliances are alliances betweenexercise price, or withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations which automatically converted on a one-for-one basis into shares of Class A common stock. The stock plan allows for the Company and financial institutions. Ifto award an equity interest in the Company has majority ownership and management control overor an alliance, thenaward that can be settled in cash measured by reference to the alliance’s financial statements are consolidated with thosevalue of the Company and the related processing fees are treated as an intercompany transaction and eliminated upon consolidation. If the Company does not have a controlling ownership interest in an alliance, it uses the equity method of accounting to account for its investmentCompany's Class A common stock.

Total stock-based compensation expense recognized in the alliance. As"Cost of services" and “Selling, general, and administrative” line items of the consolidated statements of operations resulting from stock options, non-vested restricted stock awards, and non-vested restricted stock units was as follows for the periods presented:
Year ended December 31,
 (in millions) 
 Cost of services Selling, general, and administrative Total
2017 (c)
 $72
 $173
 $245
2016 (a) (c)
 112
 151
 263
2015 (b) (c)
 130
 199
 329
(a)Approximately $52 million of stock-based compensation expense was recognized in conjunction with the IPO.
(b) Approximately $254 million was recognized in conjunction with the IPO and $14 million of stock-based compensation expense was recognized as a result the Company’s consolidated revenues include processing fees charged to alliances accounted for under the equity method. No directors or officers of the Company have ownership interests in anydeparture of the alliances. The formation of each of these alliances generally involves the Company and the bank contributing contractual merchant relationships to the alliance and a cash payment from one owner to the other to achieve the desired ownership percentage for each. The Company and the bank enter into a long-term processing service agreement as part of the negotiation process. This agreement governs the Company’s provision of transaction processing services to the alliance.certain executive officers.

Management Agreement

First Data has a management agreement(c) Directly associated with Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. (KKR) and one of its affiliates (Management Agreement) pursuant to which KKR provides management, consulting, financial, and other advisory services to the Company. Pursuant to the Management Agreement, KKR receives an aggregate annual management fee and reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the provision of services. The Management Agreement has an initial term expiring on December 31, 2019, provided that the term will be extended annually thereafter unless the Company provides prior written notice of its desire not to automatically extend the term. The Management Agreement provides that KKR also is entitled to receive a fee equal to a percentage of the gross transaction value in connection with certain subsequent financing, acquisition, disposition, and change of control transactions, as well as a termination fee based on the net present value of future payment obligations under the Management Agreement in the event of anour initial public offering, or under certain other circumstances.the Company incurred $254 million and $52 million in stock-based compensation expense during 2015 and 2016 respectively. During 2016, the Company incurred an increase of $136 million in ongoing stock-based compensation expense as employee awards

7482



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The Management Agreement terminates automatically upon the consummation of an initial public offering and may be terminated at any time by mutual consent of the Company and KKR. The Management Agreement also contains customary exculpation and indemnification provisions in favor of KKR and its affiliates. During 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company incurred $20 million in management fees in each year.
Certain members of the Company’s Board of Directors are affiliated with KKR.
Transactions and Balances Involving Company Affiliates
In 2014, 2013, and 2012, KKR Capital Markets LLC (KCM) assisted the Company in arranging and coordinating the Company’s request for an extension of the maturity of certain commitments and loans under its senior secured lending facility. The Company paid KCM $1 million for such services in each year. Also during 2014, 2013, and 2012, the Company entered into purchase agreements in which KCM agreed to serve as one of the initial purchasers for offerings of secured notes and receive a portion of the underwriting commissions for the offerings. Under the terms of the agreements, the Company paid underwriting commissions to KCM of $7 million in each year.
On April 2, 2013 and April 8, 2013, the Company entered into engagement letters with KCM and others, pursuant to which KCM agreed to assist in arranging and coordinating the Company’s request for a reduction of interest rate for certain loans under its senior secured lending facility. The Company paid KCM $3 million for such services.
During 2014, 2013, and 2012, the Company paid $7 million, $11 million, and $12 million, respectively, of expenses to KKR Capstone Americas LLC, a consulting company that works exclusively with KKR’s portfolio companies, for consulting, financial, and other advisory services provided to the Company. 
Note 9: Commitments and Contingencies
Operating Leases
The Company leases certain of its facilities and equipment under operating lease agreements, substantially all of which contain renewal options and escalation provisions. The following table presents the amounts associated with total rent expense for operating leases:
Year ended December 31,
 (in millions)
Amount
2014$77.4
201376.1
201272.4
Future minimum aggregate rental commitments as of December 31, 2014 under all noncancelable operating leases, net of sublease income are due in the following years:
Year ended December 31,
 (in millions)
Amount
2015$60.1
201653.7
201742.8
201837.5
201931.7
Thereafter77.2
Total$303.0
Sublease income is earned from leased space and leased equipment which FDC concurrently subleases to third parties with comparable time periods. As of December 31, 2014, sublease amounts totaled $5 million in FDC obligations. In addition, the Company has certain guarantees imbedded in leases and other agreements wherein the Company is required to relieve the counterparty in the event of changes in the tax code or rates. The Company believes the fair value of such guarantees is insignificant due to the likelihood and extent of the potential changes.

75



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Letters of Credit
The Company has $43 million in outstanding letters of credit as of December 31, 2014, all of which were issued underexpensed over the Company’s senior secured revolving credit facility and expire prior to December 10, 2015 with a one-year renewal option. The letters of credit are held in connection with lease arrangements, bankcard association agreements, and other security agreements. The Company expects to renew most of the letters of credit prior to expiration.
Contingencies
The Company is involved in various legal proceedings. Accruals have been made with respect to these matters, where appropriate, which are reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company may enter into discussions regarding settlement of these matters, and may enter into settlement agreements, if it believes settlement is in the best interest of the Company. The matters discussed below, if decided adversely to or settled by the Company, individually or in the aggregate, may result in liability material to the Company’s financial condition and/or results of operations.
There are asserted claims against the Company where an unfavorable outcome is considered to be reasonably possible. These claims can generally be categorized in the following areas: (1) patent infringement which results from claims that we are using technology that has been patented by another party; (2) merchant customer matters often associated with alleged processing errors or disclosure issues and claims that one of the subsidiaries of the Company has violated a federal or state requirement regarding credit reporting or collection in connection with its check verification guarantee, and collection activities; and (3) other matters which may include issues such as employment. The Company's estimates of the possible ranges of losses in excess of any amounts accrued are $0 to $30 million for patent infringement, $0 to $60 million for merchant customer matters and $0 to $5 million for other matters, resulting in a total estimated range of possible losses of $0 to $95 million for all of the matters described above.
The estimated range of reasonably possible losses is based on information currently available and involves elements of judgment and significant uncertainties. As additional information becomes available and the resolution of the uncertainties becomes more apparent, it is possible that actual losses may exceed even the high end of the estimated range.
Other
In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to claims and litigation, including indemnification obligations to purchasers of former subsidiaries. Management of the Company believes that such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.
Contingent Consideration
Over the past three years, the Company completed three acquisitions in which contingent consideration was recorded. The transactions called for cash consideration as well as contingent payments for achievement of certain milestones. As part of the purchase price, the Company recorded a $29 million liability for the contingent consideration. This fair value measurement represents a Level 3 measurement as it is based on significant inputs not observable in the market. Significant judgment is employed in determining the appropriateness of these assumptions as of the acquisition date. The primary assumption is the estimated number of merchant locations that will be using the software or technology in the next three years. Refer to Note 3 "Acquisitions and Dispositions" of these Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding these acquisitions.

The following table provides the roll forward of contingent consideration measured at Level 3:

76



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


(in millions)
Fair Value Measurement
 Using Significant
 Unobservable Inputs
 (Level 3)
Contingent consideration
Beginning balance as of January 1, 2013$26.3
Initial estimate of contingent consideration
Contingent consideration payments
Change in fair value of contingent consideration
Ending balance as of December 31, 201326.3
Initial estimate of contingent consideration2.7
Contingent consideration payments
Change in fair value of contingent consideration
Ending balance as of December 31, 2014$29.0
Note 10: First Data Corporation Stockholder’s Equity and Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest
Dividends
The Company’s senior secured revolving credit facility, senior secured term loan facility, and the indentures governing the senior secured notes, senior unsecured notes, and senior subordinated notes limit the Company's ability to pay dividends. The restrictions are subject to numerous qualifications and exceptions, including an exception that allows the Company to pay a dividend to repurchase, under certain circumstances, the equity of Parent held by employees, officers and directors that were obtained in connection with the stock compensation plan. The Company paid cash dividends to its parent, FDH, totaling $686 million during 2014, $28 million during 2013, and $7 million during 2012.

77



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Other Comprehensive Income
The income tax effects allocated to and the cumulative balance of each component of OCI are as follows:
(in millions) 
Beginning
 Balance
 
Pretax
 Gain
 (Loss)
 Amount
 
Tax
 (Benefit)
 Expense
 
Net-of-
 Tax
 Amount
 
Ending
 Balance
As of December 31, 2014          
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities $2.3
 $(6.8) $
 $(6.8) $(4.5)
Foreign currency translation adjustment (a)
 (504.4) (298.1) (1.0) (297.1) (801.5)
Pension liability adjustments (86.6) (35.2) 0.9
 (36.1) (122.7)
  $(588.7) $(340.1) $(0.1) $(340.0) $(928.7)
           
As of December 31, 2013  
  
  
  
  
Unrealized gains on securities $1.1
 $1.9
 $0.7
 $1.2
 $2.3
Foreign currency translation adjustment (a)
 (425.9) (103.1) (24.6) (78.5) (504.4)
Pension liability adjustments (127.4) 64.3
 23.5
 40.8
 (86.6)
  $(552.2) $(36.9) $(0.4) $(36.5) $(588.7)
           
As of December 31, 2012  
  
  
  
  
Unrealized gains on securities $0.9
 $0.3
 $0.1
 $0.2
 $1.1
Unrealized gains (losses) on hedging activities (72.2) 114.9
 42.7
 72.2
 
Foreign currency translation adjustment (a)
 (438.3) 28.4
 16.0
 12.4
 (425.9)
Pension liability adjustments (88.8) (61.8) (23.2) (38.6) (127.4)
  $(598.4) $81.8
 $35.6
 $46.2
 $(552.2)
(a)Net-of-tax Foreign currency translation adjustment for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 is different than the amount presented on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) by $(11) million, $1 million, and $3 million, respectively, due to the foreign currency translation adjustment related to noncontrolling interests not included above.
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest
The following table presents a summary of the redeemable noncontrolling interest activity in 2014 and 2013:
(in millions)
Redeemable
Noncontrolling
Interest
Balance as of January 1, 2013$67.4
Distributions(34.4)
Share of income34.1
Adjustment to redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interest2.0
Balance as of December 31, 201369.1
Distributions(34.5)
Share of income33.7
Adjustment to redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interest2.1
Balance as of December 31, 2014$70.4
Note 11: Stock Compensation Plans
The Company’s parent, FDH, has a stock incentive plan for employees of FDC and its affiliates (stock plan). The stock plan provides the opportunity for certain employees to purchase shares in FDH and then receive a number of options or restricted stock based on a multiple of their investment in such shares. The plan also allows for the Company to award shares and options to employees. The participants of the stock plan enter into a management stockholders’ agreement. Principal terms of the

78



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


management stockholders’ agreement include restrictions on transfers, lock ups, right of first refusal, registration rights, and a confidentiality, non-solicitation and non-compete covenant. The expense associated with this plan is recorded by FDC. The number of shares authorized under the stock plan was 180 million as of December 31, 2014.

The participants of the stock plan have the right to require FDH to repurchase the shares and options upon the employee’s termination due to death or disability. The put rights expire one year after the termination event or upon a change in control. The repurchase price for the shares is their fair market value at the time of repurchase. The repurchase price for the options is their intrinsic value at the time of repurchase.
The Company defers recognition of substantially all ofrequisite service period. During 2017, the stock-based compensation expense related to stock options and non-vested restricted stock awards and units. Due to the natureconsists of call rights associated with stock options, the Company will recognize expense related to most options only upon certain liquidity or employment termination events. The nature of the call rights associated with stock options creates a performance conditionongoing employee award programs that is not considered probable until the occurrence of one of the events described above. The call rights create a performance condition as they allow FDH to repurchase options at the lesser of the fair value or the exercise price upon an option holder’s voluntary termination.
Stock-based compensation expense will be recognized related to certain restricted stock awards and units only upon a liquidity or employment termination event which triggers vesting. For the remaining awards that vest based solely on service conditions, expense is recognizedexpensed over the requisite service period.

Under certain circumstances,On September 28, 2015, the Company may redeem common stock held by its employees on behalfauthorized the grant of its parent company, FDH.
Total stock-based compensation expense recognized in the “Selling, general, and administrative” line item of the Consolidated Statements of Operations resulting from stock options, non-vested restricted stock awards, and non-vested restricted stock units, was as follows:
Year ended December 31,
 (in millions) 
Amount
2014$50.5
201339.1
201212.4
During 2014,and options to certain executives in connection with the consummation of its initial public offering and these awards were valued at approximately $37$120 million, resulting in incremental unrecognized compensation expense. Two-thirds of stock-based compensation expense was recognized asthese grants are subject to time-based vesting conditions over five years and one-third are subject to a resultmarket-based vesting condition. Subject to the recipient’s continued service with the Company through the applicable vesting event, shares subject to market-based stock options and market-based restricted stock will fully vest on the date immediately following the date on which the closing trading price of a share of Class A common stock on the departure of certain executive officers. During 2013, approximately $20 million of stock-based compensation expense was recognized as a result of granting an executive officerNYSE or other such primary exchange on which shares of Class A common stock of FDHare listed and fully vested restricted stock units.traded has equaled or exceeded two times the per share price to the public in the offering for ten consecutive trading days.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The Company has a deferred compensationan employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 6.3 million shares of the Company's common stock is authorized. The price for non-employee directors that allows each of these directors to defer their annual compensation. Theshares purchased under the plan is unfunded. For purposes95% of determining the investment returnmarket value on the deferred compensation,last day of each director’s account is treated as if credited with a numbercalendar quarter. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the amount of shares of FDH stock determined by dividingissued under the deferred compensation amount by the first Board approved fair value of the stock during the year. The account balance will be paid in cash upon termination of Board service, certain liquidity events or other certain events at the fair value of the stock at the time of settlement. Due to the cash settlement provisions, the account balances are recorded as a liability and are adjusted to fair value quarterly. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the balance of this liability was $1 million.plan were not material.

Stock Options

During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 2012,2015, time-based options were granted under the stock plan. The time-based options have a contractual term of 10 years. Time-based options vest equally over a three to five year period from the date of issuance. The outstanding time-based options also have certain accelerated vesting provisions that become effective upon a change in control, a qualified public offering, or certain termination events.

As of December 31, 2014,2017, there was approximately $154$46 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock options that will onlyto be recognized uponover a qualified public offering or certain liquidity or employment termination events.
During 2014, 2013, and 2012, FDH paid $15 million, $22 million, and $3 million, respectively, to repurchase shares from employees that terminated employment with the Company.

79weighted-average period of approximately two years.



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The fair value of FDH stock options granted for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 20122015 were estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

Year ended December 31,
Year ended December 31,

2014 2013 2012
2017 2016 2015
Risk-free interest rate
2.24%
1.40%
1.45%
2.28%
2.08%
1.87%
Dividend yield











Volatility
50.45%
56.61%
51.77%
Expected volatility
38.97%
41.33%
55.15%
Expected term (in years)
7

7

7

7

7

7
Fair value of stock
$4.00

$3.50

$3.00
Fair value of options
$2.14

$1.99

$1.60

$7.52

$5.33

$8.68
 
Risk-free interest rate—The risk-free rate for stock options granted during the period was determined by using a zero-coupon U.S. Treasury rate for the periods that coincided with the expected terms listed above.

Expected dividend yield—No routine dividends are currently being paid, by FDH, or are expected to be paid in future periods.

Expected volatility—As FDH is a non-publiclythe Company does not have sufficient historical data due to its relatively short history of being publicly traded, company, the expected volatility is based on the historical volatilities of a group of guideline companies.

Expected term—The Company estimated the expected term by consideringutilizing the historical exercise and termination behavior of employees that participated in“simplified method” as allowed by the Company’s previous equity plans, the vesting conditions of options granted under the stock plan, as well as the impact of limited liquidity for common stock of a non-publicly traded company.SEC.

Fair value of stock—The Company determined the fair value based on discounted cash flows and comparison to a group of guideline companies.
A summary of FDHcompanies prior to being publicly traded on October 15, 2015 and the Company's closing stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2014 is as follows:
(options in millions) Options 
Weighted-Average
 Exercise Price
 
Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual
 Term
Outstanding as of January 1, 2014 90.9
 $3.28
  
Granted 16.4
 $4.00
  
Exercised (2.4) $3.03
  
Cancelled / Forfeited (1.8) $3.24
  
Outstanding as of December 31, 2014 103.1
 $3.40
 7 years
Options exercisable as of December 31, 2014 45.3
 $3.13
 6 years
The total intrinsic value and amount paid related to stock options exercised during the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 was $2 million, $3 million, and $0 million, respectively.
Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Units
In the first quarter of 2014, FDH expanded participation in the plan by granting 31 million restricted stock awards to substantially all of the Company’s employees. The restrictions on a majority of these awards will lapse upon the later of three years or following an initial public offering or upon certain employment termination events. For the remainder of these awards, the restrictions will lapse following an initial public offering or upon certain employment termination events. price thereafter.

Restricted stock awards and units were granted under the stock plan during 2014, 2013, and 2012. Grants were made as incentive awards. The restrictions on the awards granted will lapse upon a qualified public offering, a change in control or certain employment termination or liquidity events. As of December 31, 2014 there was approximately $172 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock. Approximately $3 million will be recognized over a period of

8083



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


approximately one year withA summary of stock option activity for the remainder recognized upon the occurrence of certain liquidity or employment termination events.years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was as follows:
(options in millions) Options 
Weighted-Average
 Exercise Price
 
Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual
 Term
 Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in millions)
Outstanding as of December 31, 2015 41
 $11.94
    
Granted 2
 12.62
    
Exercised (2) 9.86
    
Canceled / Forfeited (2) 15.39
    
Outstanding as of December 31, 2016 39
 $12.00
 6 years $98
Granted 
 
    
Exercised (5) 9.94
    
Canceled / Forfeited 
 
    
Outstanding as of December 31, 2017 34
 $12.27
 6 years $150
Options exercisable as of December 31, 2017 24
 $11.48
 5 years $124
 
During 2014, 2013,The total intrinsic value related to stock options exercised for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2012, the Company paid $52015 was $32 million, $6 million, and $2$4 million, respectively,respectively.

Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Units

The grant date fair value of each award is based on the closing stock price at the date of grant. Grants were made as incentive awards, which generally vest 20% on the first anniversary, 40% on the second anniversary, and the remaining 40% on the third anniversary. As of December 31, 2017, there was approximately $344 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock that will be recognized over the respective service period of approximately two years. During 2017, 2016, and 2015, the Company did not pay any significant cash amounts to repurchase stock awards from employees that terminated employment with the Company.

A summary of FDH restricted stock award and restricted stock unit activity for the yearyears ended December 31, 20142017 and 2016 is as follows:
(awards/units in millions) Awards/Units 
Weighted-Average
 Grant-Date Fair Value
 Awards/Units 
Weighted-Average
 Grant-Date Fair Value
Non-vested as of January 1, 2014 16.9
 $3.18
Non-vested as of December 31, 2015 32
 $14.30
Granted 37.2
 $4.00
 18
 12.49
Vested (3.8) $3.18
 (10) 13.91
Cancelled / Forfeited (3.8) $3.81
Non-vested as of December 31, 2014 46.5
 $3.79
Canceled / Forfeited (6) 13.74
Non-vested December 31, 2016 34
 $13.59
Granted 23
 16.94
Vested (15) 13.86
Canceled / Forfeited (4) 14.11
Non-vested as of December 31, 2017 (a)
 38
 $15.47
(a)Includes 7 million of shares subject to market conditions.

The total fair value of shares vested (measured as of the date of vesting) during the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 20122015 was $15$204 million, $18$137 million, and $3$11 million, respectively.
Note 12: Employee Benefit Plans
Defined Contribution Plans
FDC maintains defined contribution savings plans covering virtually all of the Company’s U.S. employees and defined contribution pension plans for international employees primarily in the United Kingdom and Australia. The plans provide tax-deferred amounts for each participant, consisting of employee elective contributions, Company matching and discretionary Company contributions. As of January 1, 2014, the Company suspended matching contributions for all U.S. participants. As a result, the U.S. Plan is no longer a safe harbor plan.
The following table presents the aggregate amounts charged to expense in connection with these plans:
Year ended December 31,
 (in millions)
Amount
2014$14.8
201345.5
201245.2
Defined Benefit Plans
The Company has defined benefit pension plans which are frozen and covers certain full-time employees in the United Kingdom and the U.S. The Company also has separate plans covering certain employees located primarily in Germany, Greece, and Austria.
The Company uses December 31 as the measurement date for its plans.

8184



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Note 5: Stockholders' Equity and Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest

Dividends

The following table providesCompany’s senior secured revolving credit facility, senior secured term loan facility, and the indentures governing the senior secured notes, senior unsecured notes, and senior subordinated notes limit the Company's ability to pay dividends. The restrictions are subject to numerous qualifications and exceptions, including an exception that allows the Company to pay a reconciliationdividend to repurchase, under certain circumstances, the equity of the changesCompany's former parent, FDH, held by employees, officers and directors that were obtained in connection with the plans’ projected benefit obligationsstock compensation plan. Prior to the Company filing its prospectus with the Securities and fair valueExchange Commission and the merger with FDH, the Company paid cash dividends to FDH totaling $4 million during 2015. The Company has not paid any cash dividends since the IPO.

Other Comprehensive Income
The income tax effects allocated to and the cumulative balance of assets for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013,each component of OCI are as well as a statement of the funded status as of the respective period ends.follows:
  As of December 31,
(in millions)  2014 2013
Change in benefit obligation
 

 
Benefit obligation at beginning of period
$909.7

$909.1
Service costs
4.8

3.1
Interest costs
41.1

37.2
U.K. plan benefit curtailment gain


(10.9)
Actuarial loss (gain)
142.0

(10.4)
Benefits paid
(34.1)
(30.7)
Foreign currency translation
(44.3)
12.3
Benefit obligation at end of period
1,019.2

909.7
Change in plan assets
   
Fair value of plan assets at the beginning of period
910.3

805.8
Actual return on plan assets
152.7

81.9
Company contributions
14.9

36.8
Benefits paid
(32.8)
(29.4)
Foreign currency translation
(46.5)
15.2
Fair value of plan assets at end of period
998.6

910.3
Funded status of the plans
$(20.6)
$0.6

  As of December 31,
(in millions)  2014 2013
U.K. plan:
 

 
Plan benefit obligations
$(754.8)
$(682.1)
Fair value of plan assets
836.1

755.5
Net pension assets (a)
81.3

73.4
     
U.S. and other foreign plans:
   
Plan benefit obligations
(264.4)
(227.6)
Fair value of plan assets
162.5

154.8
Net pension liabilities (b)
(101.9)
(72.8)
Funded status of the plans
$(20.6)
$0.6
(in millions) 
Beginning
 Balance
 
Pretax
 Gain
 (Loss)
 Amount
 
Tax
 (Benefit)
 Expense
 
Net-of-
 Tax
 Amount
 
Ending
 Balance
As of December 31, 2017          
Foreign currency translation adjustment (a)
 $(1,317) $165
 $(24) $189
 $(1,128)
Pension liability adjustments (98) 93
 21
 72
 (26)
Derivative instruments 3
 9
 
 9
 12
Marketable securities (2) 
 
 
 (2)
  $(1,414)
$267

$(3)
$270

$(1,144)
           
As of December 31, 2016  
  
  
  
  
Foreign currency translation adjustment (a)
 $(1,169) $(149) $(1) $(148) $(1,317)
Pension liability adjustments (b)
 (136) 34
 (4) 38
 (98)
Derivative instruments 
 3
 
 3
 3
Marketable securities (2) 
 
 
 (2)
  $(1,307)
$(112)
$(5)
$(107)
$(1,414)
           
As of December 31, 2015  
  
  
  
  
Foreign currency translation adjustment (a)
 $(889) $(261) $19
 $(280) $(1,169)
Pension liability adjustments (123) (19) (6) (13) (136)
Marketable securities (5) 3
 
 3
 (2)
  $(1,017)
$(277)
$13

$(290)
$(1,307)
(a)Pension assets areNet-of-tax Foreign currency translation adjustment for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 is different than the amount presented on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) by $12 million, $(5) million, and $(10) million, respectively, due to the foreign currency translation adjustment related to noncontrolling interests not included in “Other long-term assets” of the Consolidated Balance Sheets.above.
(b)Pension liabilities are included2016 pretax benefit includes an approximate $10 million reclassification out of OCI to "Other operating expenses" in “Other long-term liabilities”the consolidated statements of operations related to the Consolidated Balance Sheets.lump sum cash payout of certain U.S. based pension liabilities.
  
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $1.0 billion and $909 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

82



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The following table summarizes the activity in other comprehensive income, net of tax:
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions) 2014 2013 2012
Total unrecognized loss included in accumulated other comprehensive income at the beginning of period
$(86.6)
$(127.4)
$(88.8)
Unrecognized (loss) gain arising during the period
(37.9)
31.5

(39.9)
U.K. plan curtailment gain


6.9


Amortization of deferred losses to net periodic benefit expense (a)
1.8

2.4

1.3
Total unrecognized loss included in accumulated other comprehensive income at end of period
$(122.7)
$(86.6)
$(127.4)
(a)Expected amortization of deferred losses to net periodic benefit expense in 2015 is $3 million pretax.
Amounts recorded in other comprehensive income represent unrecognized net actuarial gains and losses. The Company does not have net transition assets or obligations.
The following table provides the components of net periodic benefit cost for the plans:
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions)  2014 2013 2012
Service costs
$4.8

$3.1
 $5.0
Interest costs
41.1

37.2
 37.7
Expected return on plan assets
(50.1)
(44.1) (44.7)
Amortization
1.8

4.0
 2.1
Net periodic benefit expense
$(2.4)
$0.2
 $0.1
Assumptions The weighted-average rate assumptions used in the measurement of the Company’s benefit obligations are as follows:
  As of December 31,
  2014 2013 2012
Discount rate
3.67%
4.56% 4.29%
Rate of compensation increase (a)
1.89%
1.70% 3.95%
(a)The rate of compensation increases generally apply to active plans.

The weighted-average rate assumptions used in the measurement of the Company’s net cost were as follows:
  Year ended December 31,
  2014 2013 2012
Discount rate
4.27%
4.06%
4.71%
Expected long-term return on plan assets
5.47%
5.55%
6.11%
Rate of compensation increase (a)
2.08%
1.96%
3.60%
(a)The rate of compensation increases generally apply to active plans.
The Company employs a building block approach in determining the long-term rate of return for plan assets with proper consideration of diversification and re-balancing. Historical markets are studied and long-term historical relationships between equities and fixed-income securities are preserved consistent with the widely accepted capital market principle that assets with higher volatility generate a greater return over the long run. Current market factors such as inflation and interest rates are evaluated before long-term capital market assumptions are determined. Peer data and historical returns are reviewed to check for reasonableness and appropriateness. All assumptions are the responsibility of management.

Plan assets The Company employs a total return investment approach whereby a mix of equities and fixed income investments are used to maximize the long-term return of plan assets for a prudent level of risk. Risk tolerance is established through careful consideration of plan liabilities and plan funded status. The investment portfolio contains a diversified blend of equity and fixed-income investments. Furthermore, equity investments are diversified across U.S. and global equity investments. In

83



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


addition, private equity securities comprise a very small part of the equity allocation. The fixed income allocation is a combination of fixed income investment strategies designed to contribute to the total rate of return of all plan assets while minimizing risk and supporting the duration of plan liabilities. The Company's pension plan target allocation for the U.S. plans based on the investment policy as of December 31, 2014 was 40% equity securities and 60% debt securities.
Investment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through quarterly investment portfolio reviews, annual liability measurements, and periodic asset and liability studies. The general philosophy of the Benefit Committee in setting the allocation percentages for the domestic plan is to adhere to the appropriate allocation mix necessary to support the underlying plan liabilities as influenced significantly by the demographics of the participants and the frozen nature of the plan.
The goal of the Board of Trustees of the United Kingdom plan is the acquisition of secure assets of appropriate liquidity, which are expected to generate income and capital growth to meet, together with new contributions from the Company, the cost of current and future benefits, as set out in the Trust Deed and Rules. The Trustees, together with the plan’s consultants and actuaries, further design the asset allocation to limit the risk of the assets failing to meet the liabilities over the long term. The Trustees approach to the investment strategy is to allocate the assets into two pools: 1) Off-risk assets whereby the focus is risk management, protection, and insurance relative to the liability target invested in, but not limited to, debt, United Kingdom government bonds, and United Kingdom government index-linked bonds; and 2) On-risk assets whereby the focus is on return generation and taking risk in a controlled manner. Such assets could include equities, government bonds, high-yield bonds, property, commodities, or hedge funds. The target allocation for this plan is 40% off-risk assets and 60% on-risk assets.
Fair value measurements Financial instruments included in plan assets carried and measured at fair value on a recurring basis are classified in the table below:
  As of December 31, 2014
  Fair Value Measurement Using
(in millions)
Quoted prices in
 active markets
 for identical assets
 (Level 1)

Significant other
 observable
 inputs
 (Level 2)

Significant
 unobservable
 inputs
 (Level 3)

Total
Investments:
 

 

 

 
Cash and cash equivalents
$8.7

$

$

$8.7
Registered investment companies:
 
  
  
  
Cash management fund
1.0





1.0
Equity funds
64.5





64.5
     Fixed income funds 
 266.7
 
 266.7
Fixed income securities


47.9



47.9
Private investment funds—redeemable (a)
165.5

440.7



606.2
Private investment funds—non-redeemable




0.1

0.1
Insurance annuity contracts




3.5

3.5
Total investments at fair value
$239.7

$755.3

$3.6

$998.6
(a)39% of portfolio is invested in equity index funds, 44% in fixed income investments, 6% in cash and cash equivalents, and 11% in other investments.

84



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


  As of December 31, 2013
  Fair Value Measurement Using
(in millions)  
Quoted prices in
 active markets
 for identical assets
 (Level 1)
 
Significant other
 observable
 inputs
 (Level 2)
 
Significant
 unobservable
 inputs
 (Level 3)
 Total
Investments:
 

 

 

 
Cash and cash equivalents
$0.8

$

$

$0.8
Registered investment companies:
 
  
  
  
Cash management fund
2.9





2.9
Equity funds
69.2





69.2
Fixed income securities


40.1



40.1
Private investment funds—redeemable (a)


793.5



793.5
Private investment funds—non-redeemable




0.1

0.1
Insurance annuity contracts




3.7

3.7
Total investments at fair value
$72.9

$833.6

$3.8

$910.3
(a)35% of portfolio is invested in equity index funds, 61% in fixed income investments, 3% in cash and cash equivalents, and 1% in other investments.
  
Fair Value Measurement Using Significant
 Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
(in millions) 
Insurance
annuity contracts

Private investment funds
non-redeemable
Beginning balance as of January 1, 2013
$3.3

$0.1
Actual return on plan assets
0.4


Settlements



Ending balance as of December 31, 2013
3.7

0.1
Actual return on plan assets
(0.2)

Settlements



Ending balance as of December 31, 2014
$3.5

$0.1

Registered investment companies The Company’s domestic and United Kingdom plans have investments in shares of mutual funds, primarily large cap, international, and global equity funds, that are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Prices of these funds are based on Net Asset Values (NAV) calculated by the funds and are publicly reported on national exchanges. The plan measures fair value of these investments using the NAV provided by the fund managers.
Fixed income securities The Company’s domestic plan has investments in several fixed income securities, primarily corporate bonds. The bonds were valued under a market approach using observable inputs including reported trades, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, and other standard inputs.
Private investment funds—redeemable The Company’s domestic and United Kingdom plans are invested in shares or units of several private investment funds, not the underlying assets. Redeemable private investment funds include collective trusts, comingled funds, pooled funds, limited partnerships, and limited liability corporations. The funds calculate NAV on a periodic basis and are available only from the fund managers. Private investment funds are redeemable at the NAV.
Private investment funds—non-redeemable The Company’s domestic plan has investments in limited liability corporations for which the plan has a limited ability to redeem or transfer its interests. Therefore, there is an illiquid market in which the plan can exit these investments. As a result, the plan measures fair value of these investments using estimates of fair value which come from partner capital statements provided by the partnerships.
Insurance annuity contracts The Company’s United Kingdom Plan is invested in several insurance annuity contracts. The value of these contracts is calculated by estimating future payments and discounting them to present value. As a result, there is no market for the Plan to exit these investments.
Contributions Contributions to the plans in 2015 are expected to be approximately $14 million.

85



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest

The estimated future benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, are expected to be as follows:following table presents a summary of the redeemable noncontrolling interest activity:
Year ended December 31,
 (in millions) 
Amount
  
2015$29.3
201630.4
201731.0
201833.1
201933.8
2020-2024186.0
(in millions) 
Redeemable
Noncontrolling
Interest
Balance as of January 1, 2015 $70
Distributions (35)
Share of income 34
Adjustment to redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interest 8
Balance as of December 31, 2015 77
Distributions (33)
Share of income 33
Adjustment to redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interest (4)
Balance as of December 31, 2016 73
Distributions (31)
Share of income 31
Adjustment to redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interest (1)
Balance as of December 31, 2017 $72
Note 6: Net Income (Loss) Per Share
Upon the HoldCo Merger, all outstanding shares of FDH's Class A Common Stock, Class B Common Stock, and Series A Voting Participating Convertible Preferred Stock (Series A Preferred Stock) automatically converted to identical shares of the Company's Class B Common Stock. Other than voting rights, this common stock has the same rights as the Class A Common Stock and therefore both are treated as the same class of stock for purposes of the net income (loss) per share calculation.
Basic net income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) attributable to FDC by the weighted-average shares outstanding during the period, without consideration for any potential dilutive shares. Diluted net income (loss) per share has been computed to give effect to the impact, if any, of shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of the Company’s common stock equivalents, which consist of outstanding stock options and unvested restricted stock. The dilutive effect of potentially dilutive securities is reflected in net income (loss) per share by application of the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, an increase in the fair market value of the Company’s post-retirement health care and other insurance benefits for retired employees are limited and immaterial. common stock can result in a greater dilutive effect from potentially dilutive securities.



















86



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The following table sets forth the computation of the Company's basic and diluted net loss per share:
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions, except per share amounts) 2017 2016 2015
Numerator:      
Net income (loss) used in computing net income (loss) per share, basic and diluted $1,465
 $420
 $(1,481)
       
Denominator:      
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per share, basic (a) 916
 902
 192
Effect of dilutive securities 24
 19
 
Total dilutive securities 940
 921
 192
       
Basic net income (loss) per share $1.60
 $0.47
 $(7.70)
Diluted net income (loss) per share (b) 1.56
 0.46
 (7.70)
       
Anti-dilutive shares excluded from diluted net income (loss) per share 12
 21
 27

(a)2015 weighted-average shares calculated using 1,000 shares outstanding prior to the HoldCo Merger and the filing of the Company's prospectus in October 2015 and the Class A and Class B common stock outstanding after these transactions.
(b)Potentially dilutive securities whose effect would have been antidilutive are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share.
Note 13:7: Segment Information
 
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by a company’s chief operating decision maker (CODM), or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. First Data’sThe Company's CODM is its Chief Executive Officer. The Company is organized ininto three segments: MerchantGlobal Business Solutions, Global Financial Services,Solutions, and International.Network & Security Solutions.

The business segment measurements provided to and evaluated by the CODM are computed in accordance with the principles listed below.below:

The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as those described in Note 1 "Summarythe summary of Significant Accounting Policies."significant accounting policies.

Segment results exclude divested businesses.Intersegment revenues are eliminated in the segment that sells directly to the end market.
Segment revenue includes equity earnings in affiliates (excluding amortization expense) and intersegment revenue. Merchant Solutions segment revenue does not include equity earnings because it is reported using proportionate consolidation as described below.

Segment revenue excludes reimbursable debit network fees, postage, and other revenue.

Segment earnings before net interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) includes equity earnings in affiliates andEBITDA excludes depreciationDepreciation and amortization expense, net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, otherOther operating expenses, and otherOther income (expense). Merchant Solutions segment EBITDA does not include equity earnings because it is reported using proportionate consolidation as described below. Additionally, segment EBITDA is adjusted for items similar to certain of those used in calculating the Company’sCompany's compliance with debt covenants. The additional items that are adjusted to determine segment EBITDA are:

stock basedstock-based compensation and related expense is excluded;
official check and money order businesses’ EBITDA are excluded as these are winding down;
certain costs directly associated with the termination of the Chase Paymentech Solutions alliance, and expenses related to the conversion of certain BAMS alliance merchant clients onto the Company’s platforms (excludes costs accrued in purchase accounting). Effective October 1, 2011, First Data and Bank of America N.A. (the Bank) jointly decided to have First Data operate the Bank’s legacy settlement platform. Transition costs associated with the revised strategy are also excluded from segment EBITDA;
debt issuance costs are excluded and represent costs associated with issuing debt and modifying the Company’s debt structure; and
KKRKohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (KKR) related items includeincluding annual sponsor and other fees for management, consulting, financial, contract termination, and other advisory services are excluded. Upon the Company's public offering on October 15, 2015, the Company is no longer required to pay management fees to KKR.

Merchant SolutionsFor significant affiliates, segment revenue and segment EBITDA are reflected based on the Company’sCompany's proportionate share of the results of itsthe Company's investments in businesses accounted for under the equity method and consolidated subsidiaries with noncontrolling ownership interests. For other affiliates, the Company includes equity earnings in affiliates, excluding amortization expense, in segment revenue and segment EBITDA. In addition, Merchantthe Company's Global Business Solutions segment measures reflect revenue-based commission payments to certain independentIndependent Sales Organizations (ISOs) and sales organizations (ISOs),channels, which are treated as an expense in the Consolidated Statementsconsolidated statements of Operations, as contra revenue to be consistent with revenue share arrangements with other ISO’s that are recordedoperations, as contra revenue.

Corporate operations include administrative and shared servicecorporate-wide governance functions such as the Company's executive group, legal,management team, tax, treasury, internal audit, corporate strategy, and certain accounting, human resources information technology, and procurement. Costs incurred by Corporate that are directly attributablelegal costs related to a segment are allocated to the respective segment. Administrative, shared service, and certain information technology costs are retained by Corporate.


87



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


supporting the corporate function. Costs incurred by Corporate that are attributable to a segment are allocated to the respective segment.

The following tables present the Company’s operating segment results for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 2012:2015:
 Year ended December 31, 2014 Year ended December 31, 2017
(in millions)  Merchant Solutions Financial
Services
 International All Other and
Corporate
 Totals Global Business Solutions Global Financial
Solutions
 Network & Security Solutions Corporate Totals
Revenues:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Transaction and processing service fees $3,253.5
 $1,412.6
 $1,378.5
 $75.3
 $6,119.9
 $3,299
 $1,418
 $1,348
 $
 $6,065
Product sales and other 414.3
 48.9
 383.6
 55.5
 902.3
 933
 205
 195
 
 1,333
Equity earnings in affiliates (a) 
 
 29.7
 
 29.7
 30
 
 
 
 30
Total segment reporting revenues $3,667.8
 $1,461.5
 $1,791.8
 $130.8
 $7,051.9
Internal revenue $19.5
 $35.5
 $7.4
 $
 $62.4
External revenue 3,648.3
 1,426.0
 1,784.4
 130.8
 6,989.5
Total segment revenues $4,262
 $1,623
 $1,543
 $
 $7,428
Depreciation and amortization 410.0
 317.3
 255.4
 49.1
 1,031.8
 $457
 $352
 $126
 $12
 $947
Segment EBITDA 1,664.6
 741.3
 532.7
 (275.9) 2,662.7
 1,824
 686
 729
 (167) 3,072
Other operating expenses and other income (expense) excluding divestitures 124.4
 1.6
 5.5
 14.9
 146.4
Expenditures for long-lived assets 52.9
 65.2
 244.1
 204.3
 566.5
Equity earnings in affiliates 201.4
 
 18.2
 
 219.6
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates 948.2
 
 152.8
 
 1,101.0

 Year ended December 31, 2013 Year ended December 31, 2016
(in millions)  Merchant Solutions Financial
Services
 International All Other and
Corporate
 Totals Global Business Solutions Global Financial
Solutions
 Network & Security Solutions Corporate Totals
Revenues:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Transaction and processing service fees $3,255.2
 $1,320.3
 $1,320.3
 $74.7
 $5,970.5
 $3,201
 $1,372
 $1,309
 $
 $5,882
Product sales and other 384.2
 48.2
 367.2
 46.7
 846.3
 826
 221
 176
 
 1,223
Equity earnings in affiliates (a) 
 
 31.9
 
 31.9
 36
 
 
 
 36
Total segment reporting revenues $3,639.4
 $1,368.5
 $1,719.4
 $121.4
 $6,848.7
Internal revenue $23.1
 $34.6
 $10.4
 $
 $68.1
External revenue 3,616.3
 1,333.9
 1,709.0
 121.4
 6,780.6
Total segment revenues $4,063
 $1,593
 $1,485
 $
 $7,141
Depreciation and amortization 454.1
 327.2
 264.8
 45.2
 1,091.3
 $435
 $357
 $115
 $14
 $921
Segment EBITDA 1,629.8
 617.9
 475.3
 (273.6) 2,449.4
 1,725
 646
 666
 (145) 2,892
Other operating expenses and other income (expense) excluding divestitures 21.7
 (8.2) 26.3
 (137.3) (97.5)
Expenditures for long-lived assets 22.6
 59.6
 183.9
 112.4
 378.5
Equity earnings in affiliates 168.4
 
 19.9
 
 188.3
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates 1,158.9
 
 175.4
 
 1,334.3
 
  Year ended December 31, 2015
(in millions) Global Business Solutions Global Financial
Solutions
 Network & Security Solutions Corporate Totals
Revenues:  
  
  
  
  
Transaction and processing service fees $3,209
 $1,323
 $1,322
 $
 $5,854
Product sales and other 845
 172
 142
 
 1,159
Equity earnings in affiliates 35
 
 
 
 35
Total segment revenues $4,089
 $1,495
 $1,464
 $
 $7,048
Depreciation and amortization $490
 $393
 $91
 $25
 $999
Segment EBITDA 1,681
 550
 639
 (140) 2,730


88



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


  Year ended December 31, 2012
(in millions) Merchant Solutions Financial
Services
 International All Other and
Corporate
 Totals
Revenues:  
  
  
  
  
Transaction and processing service fees $3,198.8
 $1,350.0
 $1,291.2
 $85.2
 $5,925.2
Product sales and other 404.0
 40.1
 391.0
 39.8
 874.9
Equity earnings in affiliates (a) 
 
 36.2
 
 36.2
Total segment reporting revenues $3,602.8
 $1,390.1
 $1,718.4
 $125.0
 $6,836.3
Internal revenue $20.2
 $31.5
 $9.9
 $
 $61.6
External revenue 3,582.6
 1,358.6
 1,708.5
 125.0
 6,774.7
Depreciation and amortization 520.1
 337.2
 282.9
 45.1
 1,185.3
Segment EBITDA 1,594.8
 603.1
 483.8
 (246.0) 2,435.7
Other operating expenses and other income (expense) excluding divestitures (29.1) (5.1) (24.3) (64.0) (122.5)
Expenditures for long-lived assets 25.1
 49.2
 163.9
 132.1
 370.3
Equity earnings in affiliates 137.8
 
 20.4
 
 158.2
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates 1,219.6
 
 193.5
 
 1,413.1
(a)Excludes equity losses that were recorded in expense and the amortization related to the excess of the investment balance over the Company’s proportionate share of the investee’s net book value for the International segment.


89



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


AThe following table presents a reconciliation of reportable segment amounts to the Company’s consolidated balances is as follows:for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015:
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions) 2014 2013
2012
Segment Revenues: 
  

 
Merchant Solutions $3,667.8
 $3,639.4
 $3,602.8
Financial Services 1,461.5
 1,368.5
 1,390.1
International 1,791.8
 1,719.4
 1,718.4
Subtotal segment revenues 6,921.1
 6,727.3

6,711.3
All Other and Corporate 130.8
 121.4

125.0
Adjustments to reconcile to Adjusted revenue: 
  

 
Official check and money order revenues (a) (2.7) (4.4)
(12.7)
Eliminations of intersegment revenues (62.4) (68.1)
(61.6)
Adjusted revenue 6,986.8
 6,776.2

6,762.0
Adjustments to reconcile to Consolidated revenues: 
  

 
Adjustments for non-wholly owned entities (b) 57.3
 38.4

73.2
Official check and money order revenues 2.7
 4.4

12.7
ISO commission expense 501.5
 482.5

470.9
Reimbursable debit network fees, postage, and other 3,603.5
 3,507.4

3,361.5
Consolidated revenues $11,151.8
 $10,808.9

$10,680.3
Segment EBITDA: 
  

 
Merchant Solutions $1,664.6
 $1,629.8
 $1,594.8
Financial Services 741.3
 617.9
 603.1
International 532.7
 475.3
 483.8
Total reported segments 2,938.6
 2,723.0

2,681.7
All Other and Corporate (275.9) (273.6)
(246.0)
Adjusted EBITDA 2,662.7
 2,449.4

2,435.7
Adjustments to reconcile to Net loss attributable to First Data Corporation: 
  

 
Adjustments for non-wholly owned entities (b) 24.7
 2.4

6.8
Depreciation and amortization (1,055.5) (1,091.3)
(1,191.6)
Interest expense (1,753.0) (1,880.7)
(1,897.8)
Interest income 10.6
 11.1

8.8
Loss on debt extinguishment (260.1) 
 
Other items (c) 94.1
 (132.7)
(156.9)
Income tax (expense) benefit (82.1) (86.5)
224.0
Stock based compensation (49.9) (38.1)
(11.8)
Official check and money order EBITDA (a) 1.0
 2.7

6.4
Costs of alliance conversions (20.0) (68.3)
(77.2)
KKR related items (26.9) (31.8)
(33.6)
Debt issuance costs (3.4) (5.3)
(13.7)
Net loss attributable to First Data Corporation $(457.8) $(869.1)
$(700.9)
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions) 2017 2016 2015
Total segment revenues $7,428
 $7,141
 $7,048
Adjustments:     

Non wholly-owned entities (a)
 64
 80
 74
ISOs commission expense (b)
 637
 618
 642
Reimbursable debit network fees, postage, and other 3,923
 3,745
 3,687
Consolidated revenues $12,052
 $11,584
 $11,451
       
Total segment EBITDA $3,072
 $2,892
 $2,730
Adjustments:      
Non wholly-owned entities (a)
 30
 30
 26
Depreciation and amortization (972) (949) (1,022)
Interest expense, net (937) (1,068) (1,537)
Loss on debt extinguishment (80) (70) (1,068)
Other items (c)
 (132) (71) (180)
Income tax benefit (expense) 729
 (81) (101)
Stock-based compensation (245) (263) (329)
Net income (loss) attributable to First Data Corporation $1,465
 $420
 $(1,481)
(a)Represents anNet adjustment to excludereflect the official checkCompany's proportionate share of the results of the Company's investments in businesses accounted for under the equity method and money orderconsolidated subsidiaries with noncontrolling ownership interests. Segment revenue for the Company's significant affiliates is reflected based on the Company's proportionate share of the results of the Company's investments in businesses from revenueaccounted for under the equity method and EBITDA due toconsolidated subsidiaries with noncontrolling ownership interests. For other affiliates, the Company’s wind down of these businesses.Company includes equity earnings in affiliates, excluding amortization expense, in segment revenue.
(b)Net adjustment to reflect First Data’s proportionate shareReported within "Selling, general, and administrative expense" in the consolidated statements of alliance revenue and EBITDA within the Merchant Solutions segment, equity earnings in affiliates included in International segment revenue, and amortization related to equity method investments not included in segment EBITDA.operations.
(c)Includes restructuring, certain retention bonuses, non-normal course litigation and regulatory settlements, divestitures, andasset impairments, as applicable to the periods presenteddebt issuance expenses, KKR related items and “Other income (expense)”income" as presented in the Consolidated Statementconsolidated statements of Operations.operations, which includes divestitures, derivative gains (losses), non-operating foreign currency gains (losses), and the gain on Visa Europe share sale. KKR related items represent KKR annual sponsorship fees for management, consulting, financial and other advisory services. Upon completing the IPO in October 2015, the Company is no longer obligated to pay KKR annual sponsorship fees.


90Total segment assets, capital expenditures, and investment in unconsolidated affiliates are not disclosed, as the Company's CODM does not utilize such information when allocating resources to the segment or when assessing the segments' performance.



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Segment assets were as follows as of the dates presented:
 
As of December 31,
(in millions)
2014
2013
Assets:
 

 
Merchant Solutions
$23,629.9

$23,905.3
Financial Services
3,988.8

4,176.2
International
4,723.7

5,222.9
All Other and Corporate
1,926.9

1,935.4
Consolidated
$34,269.3

$35,239.8
AThe following tables presents a reconciliation of reportable segment depreciation and amortization amounts to the Company’s consolidated balances in the Consolidated Statementsconsolidated statements of Cash Flows is as follows:cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015:
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions) 2014 2013 2012
Total reported segments $982.7
 $1,046.1
 $1,140.2
All Other and Corporate 49.1
 45.2
 45.1
Total segment depreciation and amortization 1,031.8
 1,091.3
 1,185.3
Adjustments for non-wholly owned entities 86.2
 79.1
 101.1
Amortization of initial payments for new contracts 45.3
 41.5
 44.5
Total consolidated depreciation and amortization per Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 1,163.3
 1,211.9
 1,330.9
Less: Amortization of equity method investment (62.5) (79.1) (94.8)
Less: Amortization of initial payments for new contracts (45.3) (41.5) (44.5)
Total consolidated depreciation and amortization per Consolidated Statements of Operations $1,055.5
 $1,091.3
 $1,191.6
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions) 2017 2016 2015
Segment depreciation and amortization $947
 $921
 $999
Adjustments for non-wholly owned entities 70
 75
 83
Amortization of initial payments for new contracts (a)
 56
 65
 51
Total consolidated depreciation and amortization per consolidated statements of cash flows 1,073
 1,061
 1,133
Amortization of equity method investment (b)
 (45) (47) (60)
Amortization of initial payments for new contracts (a)
 (56)
(65)
(51)
Total consolidated depreciation and amortization per consolidated statements of operations $972
 $949
 $1,022

(a)Included in "Transaction and processing service fees" as contra-revenue in the Company's consolidated statements of operations.
(b)Included in "Equity earnings in affiliates" in the Company's consolidated statements of operations.

Information concerning principal geographic areas was as follows:
(in millions)
United
 States

International
Total
Revenues:
 

 

 
2014 $9,427.7
 $1,724.1
 $11,151.8
2013
9,144.9
 1,664.0
 10,808.9
2012
9,046.0
 1,634.3
 10,680.3
Long-Lived Assets:
 

 

 
2014 $19,707.7
 $2,588.1
 $22,295.8
2013
20,019.6
 2,959.5
 22,979.1
2012
20,594.9
 3,128.3
 23,723.2
“International” represents businesses of significance, which have local currency as their functional currency regardless of the segments to which the associated revenues and long-lived assets applied. 

9189



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Note 14: Quarterly Financial Results (Unaudited)
Summarized quarterly resultsThe following tables presents revenues and long-lived assets by principal geographic area for the two years ended December 31, 20142017, 2016, and 2013, respectively, are as follows:2015:
  2014 by Quarter:
(in millions) First Second Third Fourth
Revenues $2,640.3
 $2,837.1
 $2,791.1
 $2,883.3
Expenses 2,355.8
 2,455.0
 2,438.5
 2,463.2
Operating profit 284.5

382.1

352.6

420.1
Interest income 3.0
 3.6
 2.5
 1.5
Interest expense (467.1) (463.1) (417.6) (405.2)
Loss on debt extinguishment 
 
 (260.1) 
Other income 0.9
 82.5
 56.4
 21.4
(Loss) income before income taxes and equity earnings in affiliates (178.7)
5.1

(266.2)
37.8
Income tax expense (benefit) 36.6
 40.0
 (23.1) 28.6
Equity earnings in affiliates 50.4
 58.0
 54.8
 56.4
Net (loss) income (164.9)
23.1

(188.3)
65.6
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest 35.6
 57.6
 46.3
 53.8
Net (loss) income attributable to First Data Corporation $(200.5)
$(34.5)
$(234.6)
$11.8
         
         
  2013 by Quarter:
(in millions) First Second Third Fourth
Revenues $2,590.9
 $2,708.8
 $2,712.1
 $2,797.1
Expenses 2,399.8
 2,438.5
 2,408.6
 2,439.4
Operating profit 191.1

270.3

303.5

357.7
Interest income 2.7
 2.6
 2.7
 3.1
Interest expense (469.0) (472.2) (469.0) (470.5)
Other income (expense) 0.3
 15.0
 (36.2) (26.0)
Loss before income taxes and equity earnings in affiliates (274.9)
(184.3)
(199.0)
(135.7)
Income tax expense (benefit) 61.6
 11.5
 28.6
 (15.2)
Equity earnings in affiliates 37.7
 51.0
 47.3
 52.3
Net loss (298.8)
(144.8)
(180.3)
(68.2)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest 38.6
 44.3
 39.2
 54.9
Net loss attributable to First Data Corporation $(337.4)
$(189.1)
$(219.5)
$(123.1)
(in millions)
United
 States

International
Total
Revenues:
 

 

 
2017 $10,201
 $1,851
 $12,052
2016
9,890
 1,694
 11,584
2015
9,795
 1,656
 11,451
Long-Lived Assets:
 

 

 
2017 $20,324
 $2,456
 $22,780
2016
18,846
 2,272
 21,118
2015
19,400
 2,316
 21,716
Note 8: Income Taxes


The components of pretax income and provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, consisted of the following:
92
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions) 2017 2016 2015
Components of pretax income (loss):      
Domestic $484
 $492
 $(1,332)
Foreign 451
 249
 165
  $935
 $741
 $(1,167)
Provision for income taxes:      
Federal $(795) $20
 $7
State and local (32) 20
 14
Foreign 98
 41
 80
Income tax (benefit) expense $(729) $81
 $101
       
Effective income tax rate (78)%
11%
(9)%

90



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Note 15: Income Taxes
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions) 2014 2013 2012
Components of pretax (loss) income:  
  
  
Domestic $(377.5) $(778.2) $(875.5)
Foreign 195.1
 172.6
 124.2
  $(182.4) $(605.6) $(751.3)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes:  
  
  
Federal $17.4
 $20.3
 $(301.4)
State and local 21.1
 20.2
 66.0
Foreign 43.6
 46.0
 11.4
Income tax expense (benefit) $82.1
 $86.5
 $(224.0)
       
Effective Income Tax Rate (45.0)% (14.3)% 29.8%
The Company’s effective tax rates differ from statutory rates as follows:
 Year ended December 31, Year ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012 2017 2016 2015
Federal statutory rate 35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 % 35 % 35 % 35 %
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit (0.6) 2.4
 1.1
 2
 2
 3
Nontaxable income from noncontrolling interests 37.0
 10.2
 7.9
 (7) (11) 6
Impact of foreign operations (a) (b) (9.1) (0.9) 1.5
Tax effects of foreign exchange gains/losses (5.9) 0.5
 (0.3)
Valuation allowances (b) (103.2) (53.7) (20.2)
Liability for unrecognized tax benefits (b) 12.1
 (0.6) 4.1
Impact of foreign operations (a) (1) 13
 (1)
Valuation allowances (147) (35) (54)
Liability for unrecognized tax benefits 2
 
 (2)
Prior year adjustments (b) (7.2) (6.2) 2.0
 (10) 3
 4
Nondeductible bad debts (3.0) 
 
Enacted tax rate changes 27
 (1) 
Other tax reform bill impact for foreign related items 17
 
 
Equity Compensation 
 5
 
Impact of divestiture 2
 
 
Other (0.1) (1.0) (1.3) 2
 
 
Effective tax rate (45.0)%
(14.3)%
29.8 % (78)%
11 %
(9)%
(a)The impact of foreign operations includes the effects of earnings and profits adjustments, foreign losses, and differences between foreign tax expense and foreign taxes eligible for the U.S. foreign tax credit.
(b)The 2014, 2013,Includes prior year true ups for certain foreign and 2012 effective tax rates were negatively impacted by a total of approximately 5%, 11%, and 9%, respectively,state net operating loss carryforwards as a result of the current year cumulative correction of immaterial prior year errors.tax rate and restructuring changes.

93



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The Company’s income tax (benefits) provisions (benefits) consisted of the following components:
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions) 2014 2013 2012
Current:  
  
  
Federal $0.3
 $(1.0) $(60.0)
State and local 38.6
 22.8
 16.0
Foreign 61.1
 51.7
 38.6
  100.0

73.5

(5.4)
Deferred:  
  
  
Federal 17.1
 21.3
 (241.4)
State and local (17.5) (2.6) 50.0
Foreign (17.5) (5.7) (27.2)
  (17.9)
13.0

(218.6)
  $82.1

$86.5

$(224.0)
Income tax payments, net of refunds received, of $96 million in 2014 were less than current expense primarily as a result of payments expected in 2015 related to 2014 tax liabilities. Income tax payments, net of refunds received, of $93 million in 2013 were greater than current expenses primarily as a result of cash payments relating to prior years and expected refunds of cash taxes paid. Income tax payments, net of refunds received, of $70 million in 2012 were greater than current expense primarily as a result of a decrease in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits.
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions) 2017 2016 2015
Current:      
Federal $8
 $22
 $5
State and local 23
 24
 23
Foreign 93
 73
 80
  124

119

108
Deferred:      
Federal (803) (2) 2
State and local (55) (4) (9)
Foreign 5
 (32) 
  (853)
(38)
(7)
Income tax (benefit) expense $(729)
$81

$101

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized. Deferred tax assets are included in both “Other current assets”"Other long-term assets" and “Other long-term assets” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Deferreddeferred tax liabilities are included in both "Other current liabilities" and "Long-term deferred"Deferred tax liabilities" inon the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table outlines the principal components of deferred tax items:
consolidated balance sheets.
  As of December 31,
(in millions) 2014 2013(a)
Deferred tax assets related to:  
  
Reserves and other accrued expenses $221.4
 $315.3
Pension obligations 
 13.1
Employee related liabilities 84.1
 99.7
Deferred revenues 29.9
 32.6
Net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards 2,160.1
 2,003.3
U.S. foreign tax credits on undistributed earnings 280.1
 274.4
Foreign exchange (gain)/loss 51.4
 68.6
Total deferred tax assets 2,827.0

2,807.0
Valuation allowance (1,649.2) (1,454.5)
Realizable deferred tax assets 1,177.8

1,352.5
Deferred tax liabilities related to:  
  
Property, equipment, and intangibles (1,081.7) (1,233.0)
Pension obligations (2.1) 
Investment in affiliates and other (331.4) (426.1)
Unrealized securities and hedging (gain)/loss (0.4) (1.3)
U.S. tax on foreign undistributed earnings (184.8) (139.6)
Total deferred tax liabilities (1,600.4)
(1,800.0)
Net deferred tax liabilities $(422.6)
$(447.5)



9491



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The following table outlines the principal components of deferred tax items:
  As of December 31,
(in millions) 2017 2016
Deferred tax assets related to:    
Reserves and other accrued expenses $66
 $
Employee related liabilities 121
 176
Deferred revenues 30
 34
Net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards 2,281
 3,122
U.S. foreign tax credits on undistributed earnings 39
 252
Total deferred tax assets 2,537

3,584
Valuation allowance (1,214) (2,396)
Realizable deferred tax assets 1,323

1,188
Deferred tax liabilities related to:    
Property, equipment, and intangibles (772) (969)
Reserves and other accrued expenses 
 (49)
Pension obligations (67) (4)
Investment in affiliates and other (209) (217)
Tax on foreign undistributed earnings (12) (252)
Foreign exchange gain (35) (91)
Total deferred tax liabilities (1,095)
(1,582)
Net deferred tax asset (liabilities) $228

$(394)

The Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities were included in the Consolidated Balance Sheetsconsolidated balance sheets were as follows:
  As of December 31,
(in millions) 2014 2013
Current deferred tax assets $86.0
 $103.5
Current deferred tax liabilities (6.3) (0.8)
Long-term deferred tax assets 18.6
 2.8
Long-term deferred tax liabilities (520.9) (553.0)
Net deferred tax liabilities $(422.6)
$(447.5)
  As of December 31,
(in millions) 2017 2016
Deferred tax assets $305
 $15
Deferred tax liabilities (77) (409)
Net deferred tax asset (liabilities) $228

$(394)
 
As of December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, the Company had recorded valuation allowances of $1.6$1.2 billion and $1.5$2.4 billion, respectively, against its net deferred tax assets. The increasedecrease to the valuation allowance of $195 million$(1.2) billion in 20142017 was primarily due to current yearutilization of federal state, and foreignstate net operating losses which may not be utilized withinand the statuterelease of limitations. Included in the total change to theUS federal and certain state valuation allowance was a release in a certain foreign jurisdictionallowances due to improved financial performance. In determining the necessary amount of valuation allowance, the Company has considered a tax planning strategy related to its investments in affiliates. Implementation of this strategy would result in the immediate reversal of temporary differences associated with the excess of book basis over tax basis in the investments.


92



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The following table presents the amounts of federal, state, and foreign net operating loss carryforwards, and foreign tax credit, general business credit, and minimum tax credit carryforwards:
As of December 31, As of December 31,
(in millions)2014 2017
Federal net operating loss carryforwards (a)$2,828.3
 $4,567
State net operating loss carryforwards (a)(b)4,719.0
 6,069
Foreign net operating loss carryforwards (b)(c)2,762.8
 3,403
Foreign tax credit carryforwards (c)215.7
General business credit carryforwards (d)11.8
 12
Minimum tax credit carryforwards (e)1.6
 30
(a)IfWill expire if not utilized, these carryforwards will expire infor the years 20152018, 2019, 2020 of $0.1 million, $0.8 million, $0.1 million, respectively, and the remaining through 2034.2037.
(b)Will expire if not utilized, for the years 2018, 2019, 2020 of $90 million, $245 million, $192 million, respectively, and the remaining through 2037.
(c)Foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $62$74 million, if not utilized, will expire in years 20152017 through 2034.2035. The remaining foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $2.7$3.3 billion have an indefinite life.
(c)If not utilized, these carryforwards will expire in years 2018 through 2024.
(d)If not utilized, these carryforwards will expire in years 2027 through 2033.2037.
(e)These carryforwards have an indefinite life.are refundable credits and will be utilized from 2018 through 2021.
In addition to the federal net operating loss carryforwards stated above, as a result of being a part of the U.S. consolidated tax return filing with FDH, the Company is allocated another $464 million of net operating loss as of December 31, 2014.

The Company intends to indefinitely invest its net equity in its foreign operations, with the exception of any undistributed foreign earnings in those jurisdictions with positive earnings. Under the U.S. tax reform law changes enacted during 2017, all existing positive earnings were deemed to be distributed, and future foreign earnings will not be taxed in the U.S. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2014,2017, no provision had been made for U.S. federal and state income taxes on the cumulative amount of temporary differences related to investments in foreign subsidiaries, other than those differences relatedsubsidiaries. However, these earnings are subject to the undistributed earnings.local country withholding tax upon distribution. Upon sale or liquidation of these investments, the Company would potentially be subject to U.S., state, and foreign income taxes and withholding taxes payable to the various foreign countries.  Determination of theThe amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to investments in foreign subsidiaries is not practicable becauseapproximately $165 million as of December 31, 2017.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (tax reform bill) was signed into law in the U.S. The provisions of the complexities associatedtax reform bill with the most significant implications to the Company were the reduction of the federal tax rate from 35% to 21%, the creation of a 100% participation exemption for foreign dividends, the enactment of a one-time transition tax on existing foreign earnings, limitations on the deductibility of interest expense, and the establishment of global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) rules. The first three provisions impacted the year-ended December 31, 2017. At December 31, 2017, the Company has not completed its hypothetical calculation.accounting for the tax effects of enactment of the Act; however, in certain cases, the Company has made a reasonable estimate of the effects on its existing deferred tax balances, valuation allowance assessment for certain tax assets and the one-time transition tax. The Company recognized a provisional net tax expense of $353 million related to the tax reform bill, which is included as a component of income tax expense from continuing operations.

The Company remeasured certain deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the federal rate at which they are expected to reverse in the future, which is generally 21%. The Company also remeasured the state rate at which certain deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to reverse in the future. Because the Company’s deferred tax assets exceed its deferred tax liabilities in the U.S., the reduction of the tax rate from 35% to 21% provided by the tax reform bill resulted in a negative impact to the tax rate of $194 million. The Company is still analyzing certain aspects of the Act and refining its calculations, which could potentially affect the measurement of these balances or potentially give rise to new deferred tax amounts.

The one-time transition tax coupled with the 100% participation exemption had an immaterial impact on the tax rate. Because the Company has historically repatriated its foreign earnings, the Company’s cumulative foreign deficits exceed its cumulative foreign profits, causing the one-time taxable inclusion under the transition tax rules to be zero. As a result of the future participation exemption, the Company determined that it will not have enough future foreign sourced income to utilize any foreign tax credit carryforwards, and has therefore determined that it will amend its 2010-2016 tax returns to elect to claim foreign tax deductions, rather than foreign tax credits. The deferred tax impact of changing the election from a credit to a deduction was $159 million. This change was assumed when determining the appropriate valuation allowance on the Company’s foreign tax credit carryforwards in prior years, and as a result, the decision to amend the returns had an immaterial net tax rate impact. The Company is still evaluating the overall impact of the one-time transition tax on the outside basis differences and cumulative temporary differences inherent in these subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017.

The tax reform bill subjects a U.S. shareholder to current tax on GILTI earned by certain foreign subsidiaries. The FASB Staff Q&A, Topic 740 No. 5, Accounting for Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income, states that an entity can make an accounting policy election to either recognize deferred taxes for temporary differences expected to reverse as GILTI in future years or provide for

9593



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


the tax expense related to GILTI in the year the tax is incurred. The Company has elected to recognize the tax on GILTI as a period expense in the period the tax is incurred.

A reconciliation of the unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2013, and 2014 iswas as follows:
(in millions)Unrecognized Tax Benefits Unrecognized Tax Benefits
Balance as of January 1, 2012$334.7
Balance as of January 1, 2015 $236
Increases for tax positions of prior years5.5
 25
Decreases for tax positions of prior years(57.7) (4)
Increases for tax positions related to the current period6.2
 1
Decreases for cash settlements with taxing authorities(0.1) (3)
Decreases due to the lapse of the applicable statute of limitations(2.4) (6)
Balance as of December 31, 2012286.2
Balance as of December 31, 2015 249
Increases for tax positions of prior years3.4
 2
Decreases for tax positions of prior years(2.9) (1)
Increases for tax positions related to the current period4.8
 
Decreases for cash settlements with taxing authorities(5.9) (1)
Decreases due to the lapse of the applicable statute of limitations(6.1) (9)
Balance as of December 31, 2013279.5
Balance as of December 31, 2016 240
Increases for tax positions of prior years2.9
 14
Decreases for tax positions of prior years(29.1) (10)
Increases for tax positions related to the current period0.9
Decreases for tax positions related to the current period (3)
Decreases for cash settlements with taxing authorities(13.2) (1)
Decreases due to the lapse of the applicable statute of limitations(4.6) (7)
Balance as of December 31, 2014$236.4
Decreases due to change in tax rates (13)
Balance as of December 31, 2017 $220
 
Most of the unrecognized tax benefits are included in the “Other long-term liabilities” line ofon the Consolidated Balance Sheets,consolidated balance sheets, net of the federal benefit on state income taxes (approximately $17$12 million as of December 31, 2014)2017). However, those unrecognized tax benefits that affect the federal consolidated tax years ending December 31, 2008 through December 31, 20142017 are included in the “Long-term deferred“Deferred tax liabilities” line ofon the Consolidated Balance Sheets,consolidated balance sheets, as these items reduce the Company’s net operating loss and credit carryforwards from those periods. The unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 20122015 included approximately $126$130 million, $161$133 million, and $163$136 million, respectively, of tax positions that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company’s liability for unrecognized tax benefits was reduced by $29 million related to the effective resolution of certain federal and state audit issues. The reduction in liabilities was recorded through a decrease to tax expense and an increase to deferred tax liabilities.
During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company’s liability for unrecognized tax benefits was reduced by $52 million upon closure of the 2003 and 2004 federal tax years and the resolution of certain state audit issues. The reduction in liabilities was recorded through a decrease to tax expense and an increase to deferred tax liabilities.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the “Income tax expense (benefit)” line item expense” in the consolidated statements of the Consolidated Statements of Operations.operations. Cumulative accrued interest and penalties (net of related tax benefits) are not included in the ending balances of unrecognized tax benefits. Cumulative accrued interest and penalties are included in the “Other long-term liabilities” line ofon the Consolidated Balance Sheetsconsolidated balance sheets while the related tax benefits are included in the “Long-term deferred“Deferred tax liabilities” line ofon the Consolidated Balance Sheets.consolidated balance sheets. The following table presents the approximate amounts associated with accrued interest expense and the cumulative accrued interest and penalties:
  Year ended December 31,
 (in millions)
 2014 2013 2012
Current year accrued interest expense (net of related tax benefits) $0.7
 $5.1
 $3.6
Cumulative accrued interest and penalties (net of related tax benefits) 38.8
 45.2
 47.2

96
  Year ended December 31,
 (in millions)
 2017 2016 2015
Current year accrued interest expense (net of related tax benefits) $6
 $5
 $7
Cumulative accrued interest and penalties (net of related tax benefits) 60
 48
 45



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


As of December 31, 2014,2017, the Company anticipates it is reasonably possible that its liability for unrecognized tax benefits may decrease by approximately $122$134 million within the next 12 months as a result of the possible closure of federal tax audits, potential settlements with certain states and foreign countries, and the lapse of the statute of limitations in various state and foreign jurisdictions.


94



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The Company or one or more of its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2014,2017, the Company was no longer subject to income tax examination by the U.S. federal jurisdiction for years before 2005. State and local examinations are substantially complete through 2006. Foreign jurisdictions generally remain subject to examination by their respective authorities from 20082007 forward, none of which are considered major jurisdictions.

In September 2017, the Internal Revenue Service issued a directive pertaining to the research and development (R&D) tax credit. The Company incurred approximately $150 million of R&D expenses during 2017.

Under the Tax Allocation Agreement executed at the time of the spin-off of The Western Union Company (Western Union) on September 29, 2006, Western Union is responsible for and must indemnify the Company against all taxes, interest, and penalties that relate to Western Union for periods prior to the spin-off date. If Western Union were to agree to or be finally determined to owe any amounts for such periods but were to default in its indemnification obligation under the Tax Allocation Agreement, the Company, as parent of the tax filing group during such periods, generally would be required to pay the amounts to the relevant tax authority, resulting in a potentially material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position and results of operations. As of December 31, 2014,2017, the Company had approximately $116$129 million of income taxes payable, including approximately $4 million of uncertain income tax liabilities, recorded related to Western Union for periods prior to the spin-off date. The Company has recorded a corresponding account receivable of equal amount from Western Union, which is included as a long-term account receivable in the “Other long-term assets” line ofon the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets,consolidated balance sheets, reflecting the indemnification obligation. The uncertain income tax liabilities and corresponding receivable are based on information provided by Western Union regarding its tax contingency reserves for periods prior to the spin-off date. There is no assurance that a Western Union-related issue raised by the IRS or other tax authority will be finally resolved at a cost not in excess of the amount reserved and reflected in the Company’s uncertain income tax liabilities and corresponding receivable from Western Union. The Western Union contingent liability is in addition to the Company’s liability for unrecognized tax benefits discussed above.

The IRS completed its examination of the U.S. federal consolidated income tax returns of the Company for 2005 through 2007 and issued a 30-Day letter in October 2012. The 30-Day letter claims that the Company and its subsidiaries, which included Western Union during some of the years at issue, owe additional taxes with respect to a variety of adjustments. The Company and Western Union agree with several of the adjustments in the 30-Day letter, such adjustments representing tax due of approximately $40 million. This undisputed tax and associated interest due (pretax) of approximately $19$26 million through December 31, 2014, have been2017, were fully reserved. The undisputed tax for which Western Union would be required to indemnify the Company is greater than the total tax due, such that settlement of the undisputed tax would result in a net refund to the Company. As to the adjustments that are disputed, such issues represent total taxes allegedly due of approximately $59 million, of which $40 million relates to the Company and $19 million relates to Western Union. The Company estimates that total interest due (pretax) on the disputed amounts is approximately $20$29 million through December 31, 2014,2017, of which $11$17 million relates to the Company and $9$11 million relates to Western Union. As to the disputed issues, the Company and Western Union are contesting the asserted deficiencies with the Appeals Office of the IRS.  In December, 2017, the Company was notified by the Appeals Office that the case had been forwarded to the Joint Committee on Taxation for review. The Company believes that it has adequately reserved for the disputed issues in its liability for unrecognized tax benefits described above and that final resolution of those issues will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.
Note 9: Related Party Transactions

Merchant Alliances

A substantial portion of the Company’s business within the Global Business Solutions segment is conducted through merchant alliances. Merchant alliances are alliances between the Company and financial institutions. If the Company has majority ownership and management control over an alliance, then the alliance’s financial statements are consolidated with those of the Company and the related processing fees are treated as an intercompany transaction and eliminated upon consolidation. If the Company does not have a controlling ownership interest in an alliance, it uses the equity method of accounting to account for its investment in the alliance. As a result, the Company’s consolidated revenues include processing fees charged to alliances accounted for under the equity method. No directors or officers of the Company have ownership interests in any of the alliances. The formation of each of these alliances generally involves the Company and the bank contributing contractual merchant relationships to the alliance and a cash payment from one owner to the other to achieve the desired ownership percentage for each. The Company and the bank enter into a long-term processing service agreement as part of the negotiation process. This agreement governs the Company’s provision of transaction processing services to the alliance. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had $35 million and $27 million, respectively, of amounts due from unconsolidated merchant alliances included within "Accounts receivable, net" in the Company's consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had $6 million and $7 million,

95



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


respectively, of amounts due to unconsolidated merchant alliances included within "Accounts payable and accrued liabilities" in the Company's consolidated balance sheets.

Management Agreement

In connection with the 2007 acquisition of the Company by affiliates of KKR, the Company entered into a management agreement with KKR and one of its affiliates (Management Agreement) pursuant to which KKR provided advisory services to the Company and received fees and reimbursements of related out-of-pocket expenses. The Management Agreement was terminated upon the consummation of the Company's initial public offering in October 2015 and FDC is no longer required to pay management fees to KKR. In the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company, inclusive of the termination fee paid in October 2015, paid $98 million of management fees to KKR. 

Relationship with KKR Capital Markets

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, KKR Capital Markets LLC, an affiliate of KKR, acted as an arranger and bookrunner for various financing transactions under the existing credit agreements, and as an initial purchaser of certain existing notes issued by the Company, and received underwriter and transaction fees totaling $1.5 million, $17 million, and $25 million, respectively.

For the year ended December 31, 2015 KKR Capital Markets LLC also acted as a placement agent in the Company's initial public offering for placement of the Company's Class A common stock and in the private placement of shares of Holdings' Class B common stock. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company paid $19 million related to such services.
Note 10: Other Operating Expenses
The following table details the components of “Other operating expenses” in the consolidated statements of operations:
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions) 2017 2016 2015
Restructuring, net $83
 $49
 $53
Deal and deal integration costs 27
 
 
Asset impairment 13
 
 
Other 20
 12
 
Other operating expenses $143
 $61
 $53

Restructuring

During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the Company recorded restructuring charges in connection with ongoing expense management initiatives and the vast majority of costs incurred are severance related. The Company continues to evaluate operating efficiencies and could incur further restructuring costs beyond these initiatives.

A summary of net pretax benefits (charges), incurred by segment, for each period is as follows:
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions) 2017 2016 2015
Global Business Solutions $(36) $(9) $(20)
Global Financial Solutions (17) (10) (11)
Network & Security Solutions (8) (3) (3)
Corporate (22) (27) (19)
Restructuring, net $(83) $(49) $(53)


96



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The following table summarizes the Company’s utilization of restructuring accruals for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017:
(in millions)  Employee Severance Other
Remaining accrual as of January 1, 2016 $29
 $1
Restructuring, net 33
 16
Loss on sale of property and equipment, net 
 (13)
Cash payments and other (53) (4)
Remaining accrual as of December 31, 2016 9
 
Restructuring, net 83
 
Cash payments and other (71) 
Remaining accrual as of December 31, 2017 $21
 $

Deal and Deal Integration Costs

During 2017, the Company completed three acquisitions, the two largest were CardConnect and BluePay. In connection with these acquisitions, the Company incurred $27 million in deal and deal integration costs for the year ended December 31, 2017. Deal and deal integration costs include asset impairment of $9 million, banker fees and other costs to close the transaction of $7 million, and other integration costs. Refer to note 12 "Acquisitions and Dispositions" of these consolidated financial statements for details regarding the Company's acquisitions.

Asset Impairment

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company incurred $6 million loss on a prepaid asset related to an early contract terminated and a loss of $7 million related to write down of abandoned technology and property.

Other

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company incurred $10 million loss on two customer related matters and $10 million related to earnout expense associated with a previous acquisition.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company incurred a $10 million loss related to the settlement of certain U.S.-based pension fund obligations.
Note 11: Settlement Assets and Obligations

Settlement assets and obligations result from the Company’s processing services and associated settlement activities, including settlement of payment transactions. Settlement assets are generated principally from merchant services transactions. Certain merchant settlement assets that relate to settlement obligations accrued by the Company are held by partner banks to which the Company does not have legal ownership but has the right to use to satisfy the related settlement obligation. The Company records corresponding settlement obligations for amounts payable to merchants and for payment instruments not yet presented for settlement.


97



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The principal components of the Company’s settlement assets and obligations were as follows:
  As of December 31,
(in millions)  2017 2016
Settlement assets:  
  
Cash and cash equivalents $1,738
 $1,620
Due from card associations, bank partners, and merchants 18,625
 13,175
Total settlement assets $20,363
 $14,795
Settlement obligations:    
Payment instruments outstanding $11
 $12
Card settlements due to merchants 20,352
 14,783
Total settlement obligations $20,363
 $14,795

The changes in settlement assets and obligations are presented on a net basis within operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. However, because the changes in the settlement assets balance exactly offset changes in settlement obligations, the activity nets to zero. 
Note 12: Acquisitions and Dispositions
Acculynk Acquisition

On May 1, 2017, the Company acquired 100% of Accullink Inc. (Acculynk), a leading technology company that delivers eCommerce solutions for debit card acceptance. The acquisition included Acculynk's PaySecure debit routing technology and its range of other services. The purchase price was approximately $85 million and Acculynk is reported as part of the Company's Global Business Solutions segment.

CardConnect Acquisition

On July 6, 2017, the Company acquired 100% of CardConnect Corp. (CardConnect) for $763 million in cash, net of cash acquired. CardConnect is an innovative provider of payment processing and technology solutions and was one of the Company's largest distribution partners. The transaction is expected to enable the Company to bring innovative partner management tools to improve merchant retention, accelerate the Company's firm-wide independent software vendor (ISV) initiative and bring immediate capabilities in enterprise resource planning (ERP) integrated payment solutions to its customers. CardConnect operations are reported as part of the Company's Global Business Solutions segment.

The acquisition was accounted for as business combination and this accounting is substantially complete. In addition to the purchase price, the Company issued $44 million in the form of stock based compensation to certain key employees of CardConnect, which is subject to service vesting conditions including continued employment with the Company. The value assigned to the common stock is being recorded as post-acquisition compensation expense and has been excluded from the total purchase price.

The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets' fair value was recorded as goodwill within the Company’s Global Business Solutions segment. The goodwill recognized was attributable to increased synergies that are expected to be achieved from the integration of CardConnect as well as potential revenue enhancements to the Company.

The Company accounted for the business combination as follows:
(in millions)  
Other current assets $58
Property and equipment 7
Intangible assets 463
Goodwill 432
Current liabilities (58)
Deferred tax liabilities (139)

98



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



The following table sets forth the components of the intangible assets associated with the acquisition as of the acquisition date:
(in millions) Acquisition-Date Fair Value Useful Life (Years)
Agent relationships $296
 18
Merchant relationships 84
 7
Software systems 39
 5
Residual buyouts 23
 4
Trade name 21
 9
  $463
  

In connection with the closing of the acquisition, the Company incurred $6 million of transactions costs, which has been included as deal and deal integration costs within "Other operating expenses" in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.
The revenue and earnings of CardConnect have been included in the Company’s results since the acquisition date and are not material to the Company’s consolidated financial results. Supplemental pro forma results of operations of the combined entities have not been presented as the financial impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements would be immaterial.

BluePay Acquisition

On December 1, 2017, the Company acquired 100% of BluePay Holdings, Inc. (BluePay) for $759 million in cash, net of cash acquired. BluePay is a provider of technology-enabled payment processing for merchants in the U.S. and Canada and was one of the Company's largest distribution partners with a strong focus on software-enabled payments and card-not-present transactions.  The transaction is expected to be highly complementary to the Company's earlier acquisition of CardConnect and enhance the Company's suite of innovative partner management tools to improve merchant retention, accelerate the Company's firm-wide ISV initiative and bring immediate capabilities in ERP integrated payment solutions to its customers. BluePay operations are reported as part of the Company's Global Business Solutions segment.

The acquisition was accounted for as business combination and this accounting is substantially complete. In addition to the purchase price, the Company issued $26 million in the form of stock based compensation to certain key employees of BluePay, which is subject to service vesting conditions including continued employment with the Company. The value assigned to the common stock will be recorded as post-acquisition compensation expense and has been excluded from the total purchase price.

The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets' fair value was recorded as goodwill within the Company’s Global Business Solutions segment. The goodwill recognized was attributable to increased synergies that are expected to be achieved from the integration of BluePay as well as potential revenue enhancements to the Company.

The Company accounted for the business combination as follows:
(in millions)  
Other current assets $27
Property and equipment 3
Intangible assets 450
Goodwill 389
Current liabilities (25)
Deferred tax liabilities (85)







99



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The following table sets forth the components of the intangible assets associated with the acquisition as of the acquisition date:
(in millions) Acquisition-Date Fair Value Useful Life (Years)
Agent relationships $195
 18
Merchant relationships 216
 10
Software systems 27
 5
Trade name 12
 5
  $450
  

In connection with the closing of the acquisition, the Company incurred $1 million of transactions costs, which has been included as deal and deal integration costs within "Other operating expenses" in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.
The revenue and earnings of BluePay have been included in the Company’s results since the acquisition date and are not material to the Company’s consolidated financial results. Supplemental pro forma results of operations of the combined entities have not been presented as the financial impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements would be immaterial.

Baltics Divestiture

On September 27, 2017, the Company divested all of its businesses in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia for €73 million (approximately $85 million), subject to closing adjustments. The businesses were reported within the GFS segment.
Online Banking

On October 2, 2017, the Company formed a digital banking joint venture, named Apiture, which combines FDC and Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. digital banking platforms, products, and services, delivering innovative technology solutions tailored for financial institutions. The joint venture will be accounted for as an equity method investment, as Apiture is owned and managed equally between the Company and Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. As a result, the contributed digital banking business will no longer be consolidated into the Company’s results. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, the Company’s digital banking business had revenue and operating income of $57 million and $11 million, respectively. Associated with the transaction, the Company recognized a $18 million gain on the formation of the joint venture, included within "Other income" in the consolidated statement of operations. The gain recognized represents the excess investment value over assets contributed.
2016 Dispositions

On September 30, 2016, the Company completed the sale of its Australian ATM business, which was reported as part of the Company's Global Business Solutions segment. Associated with the transaction, the Company recognized a $34 million loss on the sale, included within "Other income" in the consolidated statement of operations. The loss is comprised of investments of $72 million reduced by cash proceeds of $38 million. The cash proceeds are reflected within "Proceeds from dispositions" within the consolidated statement of cash flows.

2015 Acquisitions

On June 9, 2015, the Company acquired Transaction Wireless, Inc. (TWI) a provider of digital stored value products that offers gift card programs, loyalty incentives, and integrated marketing solutions for retailers, partners, and consumers. The purchase price was approximately $62 million in cash. The acquisition is reported in the Company's Network & Security Solutions segment.

In addition to TWI, the Company also completed an acquisition of a webstore builder as well as an acquisition of a wholesale independent sales organization, both of which are reported in the Company's Global Business Solutions segment.
Note 13: Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company enters into the following types of derivatives:

Floating to fixed interest rate collar contracts: The Company uses interest rate collar contracts to mitigate its exposure to interest rate fluctuations on interest payments related to variable rate debt. No payments or receipts are exchanged on interest

100



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


rate collar contracts unless interest rates rise or fall to exceed a predetermined ceiling or floor rate. The Company uses these contracts in a qualifying hedging relationship.

Foreign exchange contracts: The Company uses cross-currency swaps to protect the net investment in certain foreign subsidiaries and/or affiliates with respect to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company uses these contracts in both qualifying and non-qualifying hedging relationships.

The Company held the following derivative instruments as of the dates indicated:
 
 
 As of December 31,
  2017 2016
(in millions) Notional Currency Notional Value Assets (a) Liabilities (a) Notional Currency Notional Value Assets (a) Liabilities (a)
Derivatives designated as hedges of net investments in foreign operations:      
  
    
  
  
Foreign exchange contracts (c) AUD 100
 $28
 $
 AUD 211
 $57
 $
Foreign exchange contracts (b) EUR 915
 
 76
 EUR 
 
 
Foreign exchange contracts (c) GBP 150
 
 6
 GBP 300
 78
 
Foreign exchange contracts (c) CAD 95
 
 2
 CAD 130
 9
 
      28
 84
     144
 
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:                
Interest rate collar contracts (d) USD 4,300
 12
 
 USD 3,000
 3
 
      $40
 $84
     $147
 $
(a)The Company's derivatives are subject to master netting agreements to the extent that the swaps are with the same counterparty. The terms of those agreements require that the Company net settle the outstanding positions at the option of the counterparty upon certain events of default.
(b)The Company entered into new foreign exchange contracts with a notional value of EUR 915 million on June 14, 2017.
(c)Three cross-currency swaps matured in April 2017 (notional values of AUD 111 million, GBP 150 million and CAD 35 million). The Company received $90 million related to these swaps.
(d) The Company entered into new interest rate collar contracts with a notional value of $1.3 billion and $1.5 billion expiring in January 2019 and September 2018, respectively. The Company's remaining $1.5 billion interest rate collar contract expires in September 2019.

The maximum length of time over which the Company is hedging its currency exposure of net investments in foreign operations, through utilization of foreign exchange contracts, is through June 2020.

The maximum length of time over which the Company is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions related to the payment of variable interest on existing financial instruments is through September 2019.

As of December 31, 2017, the Company has not posted any collateral related to any of its derivative financial instruments.

Fair Value Measurement

The carrying amounts for the Company's derivative financial instruments are the estimated fair value of the financial instruments. The Company’s derivatives are not exchange listed and therefore the fair value is estimated under an income approach using Bloomberg analytics models that are based on readily observable market inputs. These models reflect the contractual terms of the derivatives, such as notional value and expiration date, as well as market-based observables including interest and foreign currency exchange rates, yield curves, and the credit quality of the counterparties. The models also incorporate the Company’s creditworthiness in order to appropriately reflect non-performance risk. Inputs to the derivative pricing models are generally observable and do not contain a high level of subjectivity and, accordingly, the Company’s derivatives were classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. While the Company believes its estimates result in a reasonable reflection of the fair value of these instruments, the estimated values may not be representative of actual values that could have been realized or that will be realized in the future.


101



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Financial Statements

Derivative gains and (losses) were as follows for the periods indicated:
  Year ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
(in millions, pretax) 
Interest
 Rate
 Contracts
 
Foreign
 Exchange
 Contracts
 
Interest
 Rate
 Contracts
 
Foreign
 Exchange
 Contracts
 
Interest
 Rate
 Contracts
 
Foreign
 Exchange
 Contracts
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:  
  
  
  
  
  
(Loss) gain recognized in "Foreign currency translation adjustment" in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) (effective portion) $
 $(98) $
 $58
 $
 $79
Gain recognized in "Derivative instruments" in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) (effective portion) (a)
 9
 
 3
 
 
 
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:  
  
  
  
  
  
(Loss) gain recognized in "Other income" in the consolidated statements of operations $
 $
 $(5) $
 $(19) $2
(a)Interest rate collar contracts.

Accumulated Derivative Gains and Losses

The following table summarizes activity in other comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 related to derivative instruments classified as cash flow hedges and net investment hedges held by the Company:
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions, after tax) 2017 2016 2015
Accumulated gain included in other comprehensive income (loss) at beginning of the period $177
 $116
 $67
(Decrease) increase in fair value of derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting, net of tax (a) (b) (56) 61
 49
Accumulated gain included in other comprehensive income at end of the period $121
 $177

$116
(a)Gains are included in "Derivative instruments" and “Foreign currency translation adjustment” on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).
(b)Net of $33 million and $0 million tax benefit for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Net of $30 million of the tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Note 14: Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases

The Company leases certain of its facilities and equipment under operating lease agreements, substantially all of which contain renewal options and escalation provisions. The Company incurred total rent expense of $80 million, $79 million, and $78 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Future minimum aggregate rental commitments as of December 31, 2017 under all noncancelable operating leases, net of sublease income are due in the following years:

102



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Year ended December 31,
 (in millions)
 Amount
2018 $63
2019 59
2020 45
2021 39
2022 35
Thereafter 105
Total $346

Sublease income is earned from leased space and leased equipment, which the Company concurrently subleases to third parties with comparable time periods. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 sublease amounts totaled less than $5 million in the Company's obligations. In addition, the Company has certain guarantees embedded in leases and other agreements wherein the Company is required to relieve the counterparty in the event of changes in the tax code or rates. The Company believes the fair value of such guarantees is insignificant due to the likelihood and extent of the potential changes.

Letters of Credit

The Company has $29 million in outstanding letters of credit as of December 31, 2017, all of which were issued under the Company’s senior secured revolving credit facility and expire prior to December 15, 2018 with a 1 year renewal option. The letters of credit are held in connection with lease arrangements, bankcard association agreements, and other security agreements. The Company expects to renew most of the letters of credit prior to expiration.

Legal

The Company is involved in various legal proceedings. Accruals have been made with respect to these matters, where appropriate, which are reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company may enter into discussions regarding settlement of these matters, and may enter into settlement agreements, if it believes settlement is in the best interest of the Company. The matters discussed below, if decided adversely to or settled by the Company, individually or in the aggregate, may result in liability material to the Company’s financial condition and/or results of operations.

There are asserted claims against the Company where an unfavorable outcome is considered to be reasonably possible. These claims can generally be categorized in the following areas: (1) patent infringement which results from claims that the Company is using technology that has been patented by another party; (2) merchant customer matters often associated with alleged processing errors or disclosure issues and claims that one of the subsidiaries of the Company has violated a federal or state requirement regarding credit reporting or collection in connection with its check verification guarantee, and collection activities; and (3) other matters which may include issues such as employment. The Company's estimates of the possible ranges of losses in excess of any amounts accrued are $0 to $5 million for patent infringement, $0 to $165 million for merchant customer matters, and $0 to $5 million for other matters, resulting in a total estimated range of possible losses of $0 to $175 million for all of the matters described above.

The estimated range of reasonably possible losses is based on information currently available and involves elements of judgment and significant uncertainties. As additional information becomes available and the resolution of the uncertainties becomes more apparent, it is possible that actual losses may exceed even the high end of the estimated range.

Other

In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to claims and litigation, including indemnification obligations to purchasers of former subsidiaries. Management of the Company believes that such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.


103



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Note 15: Employee Benefit Plans

Defined Contribution Plans

The Company maintains defined contribution benefit plans covering virtually all of the Company’s U.S. employees and defined contribution pension plans for international employees primarily in the United Kingdom and Australia. The plans provide tax-deferred amounts for each participant, consisting of employee elective contributions, Company matching and discretionary Company contributions. Effective January 1, 2014, the Company suspended matching contributions for all U.S. participants. As a result, the U.S. Plan is no longer a safe harbor plan.

The following table presents the aggregate amounts charged to expense in connection with these plans:
Year ended December 31,
 (in millions)
 Amount
2017 $10
2016 11
2015 12
Defined Benefit Plans

The Company has defined benefit pension plans which are frozen and covers certain full-time employees in the United Kingdom and the U.S. The Company also has separate plans covering certain employees located primarily in Germany, Greece, and Austria.

The Company contributed cash in the amount of $19 million, $19 million, and $12 million to defined benefit plans for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.

The Company recognizes the funded status of its defined benefit pension plans, measured as the difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the projected benefit obligation, in the consolidated balance sheets, as follows:
  As of December 31,
(in millions)  2017 2016
U.K. plan:
 

 
Plan benefit obligations
$(686)
$(713)
Fair value of plan assets
891

808
Net pension assets (a)
205

95
     
U.S. and other foreign plans:
   
Plan benefit obligations
(234)
(222)
Fair value of plan assets
166

137
Net pension liabilities (b)
(68)
(85)
Funded status of the plans
$137

$10
(a)Pension assets are included in “Other long-term assets” of the consolidated balance sheets.
(b)Pension liabilities are included in “Other long-term liabilities” of the consolidated balance sheets.

The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $920 million and $935 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Based on the valuation techniques described in note 1 "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies," as of December 31, 2017, Plan assets are comprised of approximately 20% of Level 1 securities, 80% of Level 2 securities, and an immaterial amount of Level 3 securities which comprise less than 1% of total plan assets.

The Plan paid benefits in the amount of $59 million, $39 million, and $41 million for the periods ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. The estimated future benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, are expected to be as follows:

104



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Year ended December 31,
 (in millions) 
 Amount
2018 $47
2019 48
2020 49
2021 50
2022 52
2023-2027 282

The Company's post-retirement health care and other insurance benefits for retired employees are limited and not material.
Note 16: Supplemental Financial Information

Supplemental Consolidated Statements of Operations Information

The following table details the components of “Other income” on the consolidated statements of operations:
  Year ended December 31,
(in millions)  2017 2016 2015
Investment gains $1
 $35
 $
Derivatives 
 (5) (17)
Divestitures 18
 (34) 5
Non-operating foreign currency (loss) gains (1) 19
 41
Other miscellaneous (expense) income (2) 2
 
Other income $16
 $17
 $29

Investment gains

On June 21, 2016, Visa Inc. (Visa) acquired Visa Europe (VE), of which the Company was a member and shareholder through certain subsidiaries. On June 21, 2016, the Company received cash of €24.2 million ($27 million equivalent at June 21, 2016) and Visa preferred stock which is convertible into Visa common shares. The Company will also receive a deferred payment three years after the closing date of the acquisition, valued at approximately €2.3 million ($2.6 million equivalent at June 21, 2016). As of June 21, 2016, the Class A common stock equivalent of the preferred stock was approximately $19 million. However, the preferred shares have been assigned a value of zero based on transfer restrictions and Visa's ability to adjust the conversion ratio dependent on the outcome of existing and potential litigations in the Visa Europe territory over the next 11 years.

Divestitures

See note 12 "Acquisitions and Dispositions" of these consolidated financial statements for more information on the Company's significant divestitures.






105



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Supplemental Consolidated Balance Sheet Information
  As of December 31,
(in millions) 2017
2016
Prepaid expenses and other current assets:  
 
Prepaid expenses $156

$168
Inventory 98

77
Other 81

115
Total Prepaid expenses and other current assets $335
 $360
     
Property and equipment:  
 
Land $58

$56
Buildings 270

269
Leasehold improvements 96

89
Equipment and furniture 1,508

1,386
Equipment under capital lease 607

499
Property and equipment 2,539

2,299
Less: Accumulated depreciation (1,588)
(1,416)
Total Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation $951
 $883

  


Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:  
 
Accounts payable $247
 $206
Accrued interest expense 154

169
Other accrued expenses 712

685
Other 546

504
Total Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $1,659
 $1,564

Note 17: Investment in Affiliates

Segment results include the Company’s proportionate share of income from affiliates, which consist of unconsolidated investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The most significant of these affiliates are related to the Company’s merchant bank alliance program.

A merchant alliance, as it pertains to investments accounted for under the equity method, is an agreement between FDCthe Company and a financial institution that combines the processing capabilities and management expertise of the Company with the visibility and distribution channel of the bank. The alliance acquires credit and debit card transactions from merchants. The Company provides processing and other services to the alliance and charges fees to the alliance primarily based on contractual pricing. These fees have been separately identified on the face of the Consolidated Statementsconsolidated statements of Operations.operations.

As of December 31, 2014,2017, there were eightsixteen affiliates accounted for under the equity method of accounting, comprised of five merchant alliances and threeeleven strategic investments in companies in related markets.


97



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The Wells Fargo alliance meetsmet the Significant Subsidiary test provided in Regulations S-X Rule 1-02 (w) in that the Company's equity earnings of this alliance exceeded 20% of the Company's consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes. In accordance with Regulation S-X Rule 3-09,taxes for the financial statements of Wells Fargo Merchant Services, LLC are filed with this Form 10-K as part of Item 15(c).year ended December 31, 2017.


106



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


A summary of unaudited financial information for the merchant alliances and other affiliates accounted for under the equity method of accounting is presented below.below:
 As of December 31, As of December 31,
(in millions) 2014 2013 2017 2016
Total current assets $5,427
 $4,070
Total long-term assets 239
 84
Total assets $2,865.4
 $3,244.3
 $5,666
 $4,154
    
Total current liabilities $5,347
 $3,994
Total long-term liabilities 8
 9
Total liabilities 2,759.1
 2,904.8
 $5,355
 $4,003
 
The primary components of assets and liabilities are settlement-related accounts similar to those described in Note 4note 11 "Settlement Assets and Obligations" of these Consolidated Financial Statements.consolidated financial statements.
 Year ended December 31, Year ended December 31,
(in millions) 2014 2013 2012 2017 2016 2015
Net operating revenues $1,356.8
 $1,369.3
 $1,278.4
 $1,374
 $1,434
 $1,424
Operating expenses 638.1
 675.4
 630.2
 712
 666
 666
Operating income $718.7
 $693.9
 $648.2
 $662
 $768
 $758
Net income $695.8
 $663.9
 $639.4
 $646
 $749
 $744
FDC equity earnings 219.6
 188.3
 158.2
 222
 260
 239
 
The formation of a merchant alliance accounted for under the equity method of accounting generally involves the Company and/or a financial institution contributing merchant contracts to the alliance and a cash payment from one owner to the other to achieve the desired ownership percentages. The asset amounts reflected above are owned by the alliances and other equity method investees and do not include any of such payments made by the Company. The amount by which the total of the Company’s investments in affiliates exceeded its proportionate share of the investees’ net assets was approximately $1.1$0.9 billion and $1.2$1.0 billion as of December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively.
 
The non-goodwill portion of this amount is considered an identifiable intangible asset that is amortized. The estimated future amortization expense for these intangible assets as of December 31, 20142017 is as follows:
Year ended December 31,
(in millions) 
 Amount
2015 $55.6
2016 50.8
2017 47.6
2018 29.2
2019 4.9
Thereafter 
Year ended December 31,
(in millions) 
 Amount
2018 $29
2019 4
 
These amounts assume that these alliances continue as they currently exist. Much of the difference between FDC’sthe Company's proportionate share of the investees’ net income and FDC’sthe Company's equity earnings noted above relates to this amortization. 

98107



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Note 17: Supplemental Guarantor Condensed Consolidating18: Selected Quarterly Financial StatementsResults (Unaudited)
 
As described in Note 6 "Borrowings" of these Consolidated Financial Statements, FDC’s 12.625% senior notes, 11.25% senior notes, 10.625% senior notes, and 11.75% senior subordinated notes are guaranteed by mostThe following tables show a summary of the existing and future, direct and indirect, wholly owned, domestic subsidiaries of FDC (Guarantors). The Guarantors guarantee the senior secured revolving credit facility, senior secured term loan facility, the 8.875% senior secured notes, the 7.375% senior secured notes, and the 6.75% senior secured notes, which rank senior in right of payment to all existing and future unsecured and second lien indebtedness of FDC’s guarantor subsidiaries to the extent of the value of the collateral. The Guarantors guarantee the 8.25% and 8.75% senior second lien notes which rank senior in right of payment to all existing and future unsecured indebtedness of FDC’s guarantor subsidiaries to the extent of the value of the collateral. The 12.625% senior note, 10.625% senior note, and 11.25% senior note guarantees are unsecured and rank equally in right of payment with all existing and future senior indebtedness of the guarantor subsidiaries but senior in right of payment to all existing and future subordinated indebtedness of FDC’s guarantor subsidiaries. The 11.75% senior subordinated note guarantee is unsecured and ranks equally in right of payment with all existing and future senior subordinated indebtedness of the guarantor subsidiaries.
All of the above guarantees are full, unconditional, and joint and several andCompany’s quarterly financial information for each of the Guarantors is 100% owned, directly or indirectly, by FDC. Nonefour quarters of 2017 and 2016:
  2017
(in millions, except per share amounts) First Second Third Fourth
Revenues $2,801
 $3,025
 $3,076
 $3,150
Expenses 2,474
 2,556
 2,658
 2,650
Operating profit $327
 $469
 $418
 $500
Net income (loss) $79
 $243
 $340
 $1,002
Net income (loss) attributable to First Data Corporation 36
 185
 296
 948
Net income (loss) per share:        
Basic 0.04
 0.20
 0.32
 1.03
Diluted 0.04
 0.20
 0.31
 1.00
         
  2016
(in millions, except per share amounts) First Second Third Fourth
Revenues $2,777
 $2,928
 $2,936
 $2,943
Expenses 2,539
 2,498
 2,482
 2,463
Operating profit $238

$430

$454

$480
Net (loss) income $(6)
$215

$200

$251
Net (loss) income attributable to First Data Corporation (56)
152

132

192
Net (loss) income per share: 

 

 

 

Basic (0.06) 0.17
 0.15
 0.21
Diluted (0.06) 0.17
 0.14
 0.21
(Sum of the other subsidiaries of FDC, either direct or indirect, guarantee the notes (Non-Guarantors). The Guarantors are subjectquarters may not tie to release under certain circumstances as described below.
The credit agreement governing the guarantees of the senior secured revolving credit facility and senior secured term loan facility provide for a GuarantorFY due to be automatically and unconditionally released and discharged from its guarantee obligations in certain circumstances, including under the following circumstances:
the Guarantor ceases to be a “restricted subsidiary” for purpose of the agreement because FDC no longer directly or indirectly owns 50% of the equity or, if a corporation, stock having voting power to elect a majority of the board of directors of the Guarantor; or
the Guarantor is designated as an “unrestricted subsidiary” for purposes of the agreement covenants; or
the Guarantor is no longer wholly owned by FDC subject to the value of all Guarantors released under this provision does not exceed (x) 10% of FDC’s Consolidated EBITDA plus (y) the amount of investments permitted under the agreement in respect of non-guarantors.
The indentures governing all of the other guarantees described above provide for a Guarantor to be automatically and unconditionally released and discharged from its guarantee obligations in certain circumstances, including upon the earliest to occur of:
the sale, exchange or transfer of the subsidiary’s capital stock or all or substantially all of its assets;
designation of the Guarantor as an “unrestricted subsidiary” for purposes of the indenture covenants;
release or discharge of the Guarantor’s guarantee of certain other indebtedness; or
legal defeasance or covenant defeasance of the indenture obligations when provision has been made for them to be fully satisfied.rounding)

DuringThe change in net income during the firstfourth quarter of 2014,2017 was primarily driven by the release of a valuation allowances associated with the Company's deferred tax assets.

Note 19: Subsequent Events

In January 2018, the Company corrected errors relatedstopped adjusting ISO Commissions Expense to the presentation of cost allocations and interest on intercompany notes in the Guarantor condensed consolidating financial statements related primarilyrevenue for segment reporting purposes. See note 7 "Segment Information" to 2008 and 2009. The Company does not believe these errors were material. The adjustments are limited to the guarantor footnote and do not affect any other reported amounts or disclosures in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Refer to Note 15 “Supplemental Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements” in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 for more information.

During the third quarter of 2014, the senior secured loan facilities were amended and three subsidiaries were removed as guarantors. Although these changes were not material and did not have an impact to the Company’sour consolidated financial statements the Company adjusted prior periods to align with the new guarantor structure. These adjustments are limited to the guarantor footnote and do not affect any other reported amounts or disclosures in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Refer to Note 6 "Borrowings"Part II, Item 8 of these Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the private placement.this Form 10-K.


99



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



A summary of the adjustments is as follows:
  Year ended December 31, 2013
  FDC Parent Company Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Consolidation Adjustments
(in millions) As previously reportedAs adjusted As previously reportedAs adjusted As previously reportedAs adjusted As previously reportedAs adjusted
Revenues $
$
 $7,258.2
$6,665.3
 $3,837.7
$4,430.6
 $(287.0)$(287.0)
(Loss) income before income taxes and equity earnings in affiliates (1,171.4)(1,171.4) 595.3
563.6
 522.9
599.4
 (740.7)(785.5)
Income tax (benefit) expense (302.3)(302.3) 300.6
249.7
 88.2
139.1
 

Net (loss) income attributable to First Data Corporation (869.1)(869.1) 482.6
482.6
 379.0
423.8
 (861.6)(906.4)
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to First Data Corporation (905.6)(905.6) 453.1
452.6
 282.7
331.1
 (735.8)(783.7)

  Year ended December 31, 2012
  FDC Parent Company Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Consolidation Adjustments
(in millions) As previously reportedAs adjusted As previously reportedAs adjusted As previously reportedAs adjusted As previously reportedAs adjusted
Revenues $
$
 $7,180.6
$6,568.8
 $3,781.4
$4,393.2
 $(281.7)$(281.7)
(Loss) income before income taxes and equity earnings in affiliates (1,244.1)(1,244.1) 563.5
560.8
 473.4
569.0
 (702.3)(795.2)
Income tax (benefit) expense (543.2)(543.2) 273.7
252.0
 45.5
67.2
 

Net (loss) income attributable to First Data Corporation (700.9)(700.9) 447.2
447.2
 366.8
459.7
 (814.0)(906.9)
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to First Data Corporation (654.7)(654.7) 448.6
447.4
 356.3
450.4
 (804.9)(897.8)


100



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


  As of December 31, 2013
  FDC Parent Company Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Consolidation Adjustments
(in millions) As previously reportedAs adjusted As previously reportedAs adjusted As previously reportedAs adjusted As previously reportedAs adjusted
ASSETS:            
Investment in consolidated subsidiaries $24,393.3
$24,393.3
 $5,314.0
$5,714.1
 $
$
 $(29,707.3)$(30,107.4)
Total assets 34,718.9
34,718.9
 36,076.7
35,524.7
 18,712.7
21,159.6
 (54,268.5)(56,163.4)
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY:            
Total liabilities 36,208.5
36,208.5
 14,979.9
15,483.3
 6,850.7
7,842.1
 (24,561.2)(26,056.0)
First Data Corporation shareholder's equity (1,489.6)(1,489.6) 21,096.8
20,041.4
 5,417.2
6,872.7
 (26,514.0)(26,914.1)
Total equity (1,489.6)(1,489.6) 21,096.8
20,041.4
 11,792.9
13,248.4
 (29,707.3)(30,107.4)
Total liabilities and equity 34,718.9
34,718.9
 36,076.7
35,524.7
 18,712.7
21,159.6
 (54,268.5)(56,163.4)

  Year ended December 31, 2013
  FDC Parent Company Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Consolidation Adjustments
(in millions) As previously reportedAs adjusted As previously reportedAs adjusted As previously reportedAs adjusted As previously reportedAs adjusted
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities $(1,732.5)$(1,732.5) $1,449.6
$1,332.6
 $955.6
$1,072.6
 $
$
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 164.3
164.3
 (0.6)20.8
 (148.7)(170.1) (368.1)(368.1)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 1,376.7
1,376.7
 (1,441.2)(1,341.3) (793.7)(893.6) 368.1
368.1

  Year ended December 31, 2012
  FDC Parent Company Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Consolidation Adjustments
(in millions) As previously reportedAs adjusted As previously reportedAs adjusted As previously reportedAs adjusted As previously reportedAs adjusted
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities $(1,680.8)$(1,680.8) $1,681.2
$1,520.0
 $767.0
$928.2
 $
$
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 191.9
191.9
 (12.8)5.5
 (132.6)(150.9) (443.6)(443.6)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 1,554.7
1,554.7
 (1,664.1)(1,527.0) (582.7)(719.8) 443.6
443.6



101



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The following tables present the results of operations, financial position, and cash flows of FDC (FDC Parent Company), the Guarantor subsidiaries, the Non-Guarantor subsidiaries and consolidation adjustments for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 and as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 to arrive at the information for FDC on a consolidated basis.
  Year ended December 31, 2014
(in millions) 
FDC Parent
 Company
 
Guarantor
 Subsidiaries
 
Non-
 Guarantor
 Subsidiaries
 
Consolidation
 Adjustments
 Consolidated
Revenues:  
  
  
  
  
Transaction and processing service fees $
 $3,814.1
 $3,099.6
 $(258.2) $6,655.5
Product sales and other 
 522.8
 430.2
 (60.2) 892.8
Reimbursable debit network fees, postage, and other 
 2,509.9
 1,093.6
 
 3,603.5
Total revenues 
 6,846.8
 4,623.4
 (318.4) 11,151.8
Expenses:  
  
  
  
  
Cost of services (exclusive of items shown below) 
 1,402.8
 1,596.7
 (258.2) 2,741.3
Cost of products sold 
 223.2
 174.2
 (60.2) 337.2
Selling, general, and administrative 130.4
 1,124.8
 706.6
 
 1,961.8
Reimbursable debit network fees, postage, and other 
 2,509.9
 1,093.6
 
 3,603.5
Depreciation and amortization 10.1
 606.5
 438.9
 
 1,055.5
Other operating expenses:  
  
  
  
  
Restructuring, net 9.9
 3.5
 (0.2) 
 13.2
Total expenses 150.4
 5,870.7
 4,009.8
 (318.4) 9,712.5
Operating (loss) profit (150.4) 976.1
 613.6
 
 1,439.3
Interest income 
 
 10.6
 
 10.6
Interest expense (1,737.9) (9.5) (5.6) 
 (1,753.0)
Loss on debt extinguishment (260.1) 
 
   (260.1)
Interest income (expense) from intercompany notes 316.0
 (304.9) (11.1) 
 
Other income (expense) 81.2
 99.5
 (19.5) 
 161.2
Equity earnings from consolidated subsidiaries 832.6
 294.4
 
 (1,127.0) 
  (768.2) 79.5
 (25.6) (1,127.0) (1,841.3)
(Loss) income before income taxes and equity earnings in affiliates (918.6) 1,055.6
 588.0
 (1,127.0) (402.0)
Income tax (benefit) expense (460.8) 376.4
 166.5
 
 82.1
Equity earnings in affiliates 
 201.6
 18.0
 
 219.6
Net (loss) income (457.8) 880.8
 439.5
 (1,127.0) (264.5)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest 
 
 66.4
 126.9
 193.3
Net (loss) income attributable to First Data Corporation $(457.8) $880.8
 $373.1
 $(1,253.9) $(457.8)
Comprehensive (loss) income $(797.8) $708.8
 $187.3
 $(714.2) $(615.9)
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest 
 
 55.0
 126.9
 181.9
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to First Data Corporation $(797.8) $708.8
 $132.3
 $(841.1) $(797.8)

102



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


  Year ended December 31, 2013 (As Adjusted)
(in millions) 
FDC Parent
 Company
 
Guarantor
 Subsidiaries
 
Non-
 Guarantor
 Subsidiaries
 
Consolidation
 Adjustments
 Consolidated
Revenues:  
  
  
  
  
Transaction and processing service fees $
 $3,674.9
 $3,016.9
 $(227.5) $6,464.3
Product sales and other 
 480.1
 416.6
 (59.5) 837.2
Reimbursable debit network fees, postage, and other 
 2,510.3
 997.1
 
 3,507.4
Total revenues 
 6,665.3
 4,430.6
 (287.0) 10,808.9
Expenses:  
  
  
  
  
Cost of services (exclusive of items shown below) 
 1,508.4
 1,527.9
 (227.5) 2,808.8
Cost of products sold 
 216.9
 176.6
 (59.5) 334.0
Selling, general, and administrative 115.0
 1,135.7
 638.1
 
 1,888.8
Reimbursable debit network fees, postage, and other 
 2,510.3
 997.1
 
 3,507.4
Depreciation and amortization 7.3
 623.1
 460.9
 
 1,091.3
Other operating expenses:  
  
  
  
  
Restructuring, net 18.1
 25.2
 4.7
 
 48.0
Litigation and regulatory settlements 8.0
 
 
 
 8.0
Total expenses 148.4
 6,019.6
 3,805.3
 (287.0) 9,686.3
Operating (loss) profit (148.4) 645.7
 625.3
 
 1,122.6
Interest income 0.1
 0.1
 10.9
 
 11.1
Interest expense (1,863.5) (9.7) (7.5) 
 (1,880.7)
Interest income (expense) from intercompany notes 315.0
 (276.6) (38.4) 
 
Other income (expense) (53.2) (2.8) 9.1
 
 (46.9)
Equity earnings from consolidated subsidiaries 578.6
 206.9
 
 (785.5) 
  (1,023.0) (82.1) (25.9) (785.5) (1,916.5)
(Loss) income before income taxes and equity earnings in affiliates (1,171.4) 563.6
 599.4
 (785.5) (793.9)
Income tax (benefit) expense (302.3) 249.7
 139.1
 
 86.5
Equity earnings in affiliates 
 168.7
 19.6
 
 188.3
Net (loss) income (869.1) 482.6
 479.9
 (785.5) (692.1)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest 
 
 56.1
 120.9
 177.0
Net (loss) income attributable to First Data Corporation $(869.1) $482.6
 $423.8
 $(906.4) $(869.1)
Comprehensive (loss) income $(905.6) $452.6
 $388.6
 $(662.8) $(727.2)
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest 
 
 57.5
 120.9
 178.4
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to First Data Corporation $(905.6) $452.6
 $331.1
 $(783.7) $(905.6)

103



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


  Year ended December 31, 2012 (As Adjusted)
(in millions) 
FDC Parent
 Company
 
Guarantor
 Subsidiaries
 
Non-
 Guarantor
 Subsidiaries
 
Consolidation
 Adjustments
 Consolidated
Revenues:  
  
  
  
  
Transaction and processing service fees $
 $3,637.6
 $3,014.7
 $(200.2) $6,452.1
Product sales and other 
 506.4
 419.2
 (58.9) 866.7
Reimbursable debit network fees, postage, and other 
 2,424.8
 959.3
 (22.6) 3,361.5
Total revenues 
 6,568.8
 4,393.2
 (281.7) 10,680.3
Expenses:  
  
  
  
  
Cost of services (exclusive of items shown below) 
 1,504.2
 1,559.5
 (200.2) 2,863.5
Cost of products sold 
 224.8
 170.4
 (58.9) 336.3
Selling, general, and administrative 89.4
 1,141.9
 594.1
 
 1,825.4
Reimbursable debit network fees, postage, and other 
 2,424.8
 959.3
 (22.6) 3,361.5
Depreciation and amortization 8.1
 686.5
 497.0
 
 1,191.6
Other operating expenses:  
  
  
  
  
Restructuring, net (0.2) 7.6
 15.7
 
 23.1
Impairments 
 5.1
 
 
 5.1
Total expenses 97.3
 5,994.9
 3,796.0
 (281.7) 9,606.5
Operating (loss) profit (97.3) 573.9
 597.2
 
 1,073.8
Interest income 0.1
 0.3
 8.4
 
 8.8
Interest expense (1,880.4) (7.2) (10.2) 
 (1,897.8)
Interest income (expense) from intercompany notes 313.0
 (270.7) (42.3) 
 
Other income (expense) (102.1) (8.1) 15.9
 
 (94.3)
Equity earnings from consolidated subsidiaries 522.6
 272.6
 
 (795.2) 
  (1,146.8) (13.1) (28.2) (795.2) (1,983.3)
(Loss) income before income taxes and equity earnings in affiliates (1,244.1) 560.8
 569.0
 (795.2) (909.5)
Income tax (benefit) expense (543.2) 252.0
 67.2
 
 (224.0)
Equity earnings in affiliates 
 138.4
 19.8
 
 158.2
Net (loss) income (700.9) 447.2
 521.6
 (795.2) (527.3)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest 
 
 61.9
 111.7
 173.6
Net (loss) income attributable to First Data Corporation $(700.9) $447.2
 $459.7
 $(906.9) $(700.9)
Comprehensive (loss) income $(654.7) $447.4
 $515.6
 $(786.1) $(477.8)
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest 
 
 65.2
 111.7
 176.9
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to First Data Corporation $(654.7) $447.4
 $450.4
 $(897.8) $(654.7)










104



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


  As of December 31, 2014
(in millions) 
FDC Parent
 Company
 
Guarantor
 Subsidiaries
 
Non-
 Guarantor
 Subsidiaries
 
Consolidation
 Adjustments
 Consolidated
ASSETS  
  
  
  
  
Current assets:  
  
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents $
 $22.8
 $335.6
 $
 $358.4
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts 8.0
 729.2
 1,015.1
 
 1,752.3
Settlement assets (a) 
 3,849.0
 3,705.9
 
 7,554.9
Intercompany notes receivable 3,375.3
 306.6
 
 (3,681.9) 
Other current assets 43.5
 119.3
 126.0
 
 288.8
Total current assets 3,426.8

5,026.9

5,182.6

(3,681.9)
9,954.4
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation 32.7
 619.0
 278.0
 
 929.7
Goodwill 
 9,085.1
 7,931.5
 
 17,016.6
Customer relationships, net of accumulated amortization 
 1,469.0
 1,135.1
 
 2,604.1
Other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization 604.1
 622.6
 518.7
 
 1,745.4
Investment in affiliates 
 948.2
 152.8
 
 1,101.0
Long-term settlement assets (a) 
 
 3.5
 
 3.5
Long-term intercompany receivables 6,064.4
 14,441.7
 5,134.6
 (25,640.7) 
Long-term intercompany notes receivable 319.5
 0.8
 9.3
 (329.6) 
Long-term deferred tax assets 671.1
 
 
 (671.1) 
Other long-term assets 397.0
 317.6
 297.4
 (97.4) 914.6
Investment in consolidated subsidiaries 24,473.8
 5,331.2
 
 (29,805.0) 
Total assets $35,989.4

$37,862.1

$20,643.5

$(60,225.7)
$34,269.3
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY  
  
  
  
  
Current liabilities:  
  
  
  
  
Accounts payable $8.8
 $171.0
 $100.5
 $
 $280.3
Short-term and current portion of long-term borrowings 19.6
 64.2
 77.0
 
 160.8
Settlement obligations (a) 
 3,849.0
 3,708.3
 
 7,557.3
Intercompany notes payable 308.7
 3,346.3
 26.9
 (3,681.9) 
Other current liabilities 583.3
 527.2
 421.7
 
 1,532.2
Total current liabilities 920.4

7,957.7

4,334.4

(3,681.9)
9,530.6
Long-term borrowings 20,578.5
 131.2
 1.7
 
 20,711.4
Long-term deferred tax liabilities 
 1,024.0
 168.0
 (671.1) 520.9
Long-term intercompany payables 14,396.3
 7,804.2
 3,440.2
 (25,640.7) 
Long-term intercompany notes payable 9.3
 259.0
 61.3
 (329.6) 
Other long-term liabilities 536.8
 225.4
 123.4
 (97.4) 788.2
Total liabilities 36,441.3

17,401.5

8,129.0

(30,420.7)
31,551.1
Redeemable equity interest 
 
 70.4
 (70.4) 
Redeemable noncontrolling interest 
 
 
 70.4
 70.4
First Data Corporation stockholder’s (deficit) equity (451.9) 20,460.6
 6,240.7
 (26,701.3) (451.9)
Noncontrolling interests 
 
 100.7
 2,999.0
 3,099.7
Equity of consolidated alliance 
 
 6,102.7
 (6,102.7) 
Total equity (451.9)
20,460.6

12,444.1

(29,805.0)
2,647.8
Total liabilities and equity $35,989.4
 $37,862.1
 $20,643.5
 $(60,225.7) $34,269.3

105



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


  As of December 31, 2013 (As Adjusted)
(in millions) 
FDC Parent
 Company
 
Guarantor
 Subsidiaries
 
Non-
 Guarantor
 Subsidiaries
 
Consolidation
 Adjustments
 Consolidated
ASSETS  
  
  
  
  
Current assets:  
  
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents $36.5
 $33.0
 $355.8
 $
 $425.3
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts 5.8
 776.3
 981.8
 
 1,763.9
Settlement assets (a) 
 3,785.7
 3,756.1
 
 7,541.8
Intercompany notes receivable 21.3
 
 16.8
 (38.1) 
Other current assets 64.0
 179.8
 101.3
 
 345.1
Total current assets 127.6

4,774.8

5,211.8

(38.1)
10,076.1
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation 27.9
 540.2
 281.3
 
 849.4
Goodwill 
 9,090.3
 8,157.5
 
 17,247.8
Customer relationships, net of accumulated amortization 
 1,731.8
 1,430.5
 
 3,162.3
Other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization 604.8
 516.5
 598.3
 
 1,719.6
Investment in affiliates 
 1,143.0
 191.3
 
 1,334.3
Long-term settlement assets (a) 
 
 15.2
 
 15.2
Long-term intercompany receivables 4,817.6
 11,379.2
 5,036.1
 (21,232.9) 
Long-term intercompany notes receivable 3,536.5
 288.7
 0.4
 (3,825.6) 
Long-term deferred tax assets 850.1
 
 
 (850.1) 
Other long-term assets 361.1
 346.1
 237.2
 (109.3) 835.1
Investment in consolidated subsidiaries 24,393.3
 5,714.1
 
 (30,107.4) 
Total assets $34,718.9

$35,524.7

$21,159.6

$(56,163.4)
$35,239.8
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY  
  
  
  
  
Current liabilities:  
  
  
  
  
Accounts payable $9.6
 $172.3
 $105.9
 $
 $287.8
Short-term and current portion of long-term borrowings 4.2
 66.3
 75.8
 
 146.3
Settlement obligations (a) 
 3,785.7
 3,767.7
 
 7,553.4
Intercompany notes payable 16.8
 
 21.3
 (38.1) 
Other current liabilities 686.3
 531.2
 413.0
 
 1,630.5
Total current liabilities 716.9

4,555.5

4,383.7

(38.1)
9,618.0
Long-term borrowings 22,469.1
 77.3
 10.4
 
 22,556.8
Long-term deferred tax liabilities 
 1,239.8
 163.3
 (850.1) 553.0
Long-term intercompany payables 12,172.1
 5,932.9
 3,127.9
 (21,232.9) 
Long-term intercompany notes payable 290.1
 3,450.0
 85.5
 (3,825.6) 
Other long-term liabilities 560.3
 227.8
 71.3
 (109.3) 750.1
Total liabilities 36,208.5

15,483.3

7,842.1

(26,056.0)
33,477.9
Redeemable equity interest 
 
 69.1
 (69.1) 
Redeemable noncontrolling interest 
 
 
 69.1
 69.1
First Data Corporation stockholder’s (deficit) equity (1,489.6) 20,041.4
 6,872.7
 (26,914.1) (1,489.6)
Noncontrolling interests 
 
 89.5
 3,092.9
 3,182.4
Equity of consolidated alliance 
 
 6,286.2
 (6,286.2) 
Total equity (1,489.6)
20,041.4

13,248.4

(30,107.4)
1,692.8
Total liabilities and equity $34,718.9
 $35,524.7
 $21,159.6
 $(56,163.4) $35,239.8
(a)The majority of the Guarantor settlement assets relate to FDC’s merchant acquiring business. FDC believes the settlement assets are not available to satisfy any claims other than those related to the settlement liabilities.




106



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


  Year ended December 31, 2014
(in millions) 
FDC Parent
 Company
 
Guarantor
 Subsidiaries
 
Non-
 Guarantor
 Subsidiaries
 
Consolidation
 Adjustments
 Consolidated
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES  
  
  
  
  
Net (loss) income $(457.8) $880.8
 $439.5
 $(1,127.0) $(264.5)
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:  
  
  
  
  
Depreciation and amortization (including amortization netted against equity earnings in affiliates and revenues) 10.1
 682.7
 470.5
 
 1,163.3
Charges (gains) related to other operating expenses and other income 188.9
 (96.0) 19.3
 
 112.2
Other non-cash and non-operating items, net (736.5) (367.5) (20.4) 1,127.0
 2.6
(Decrease) increase in cash, excluding the effects of acquisitions and dispositions,
resulting from changes in operating assets and liabilities
 (702.3) 631.8
 70.1
 
 (0.4)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (1,697.6)
1,731.8

979.0


 1,013.2
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES  
  
  
  
  
Proceeds from dispositions, net of expenses paid 
 270.1
 
 
 270.1
Additions to property and equipment (8.1) (124.0) (175.9) 
 (308.0)
Payments to secure customer service contracts, including outlays for conversion, and capitalized systems development costs 
 (183.2) (75.3) 
 (258.5)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired 
 (30.8) 
 
 (30.8)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment 
 2.1
 0.6
 
 2.7
Other investing activities 
 
 (4.3) 
 (4.3)
Distributions and dividends from subsidiaries 74.7
 231.8
 
 (306.5) 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 66.6

166.0

(254.9)
(306.5) (328.8)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES  
  
  
  
 

Short-term borrowings, net 9.6
 
 2.2
 
 11.8
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt 350.0
 
 
 
 350.0
Debt modification and related financing costs, net (342.8) 
 
 
 (342.8)
Principal payments on long-term debt (2,183.2) (72.8) (5.8) 
 (2,261.8)
Distributions and dividends paid to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest 
 
 (44.5) (220.9) (265.4)
Distributions paid to equity holders 
 
 (452.4) 452.4
 
Purchase of noncontrolling interest 
 
 (1.0) 
 (1.0)
Capital transactions, net 1,788.2
 
 (75.0) 75.0
 1,788.2
Intercompany 1,972.7
 (1,840.3) (132.4) 
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 1,594.5

(1,913.1)
(708.9)
306.5
 (721.0)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 
 5.1
 (35.4) 
 (30.3)
Change in cash and cash equivalents (36.5)
(10.2)
(20.2)

 (66.9)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 36.5
 33.0
 355.8
 
 425.3
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $

$22.8

$335.6

$
 $358.4

107



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


  Year ended December 31, 2013 (As Adjusted)
(in millions) 
FDC Parent
 Company
 
Guarantor
 Subsidiaries
 
Non-
 Guarantor
 Subsidiaries
 
Consolidation
 Adjustments
 Consolidated
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES  
  
  
  
  
Net (loss) income $(869.1) $482.6
 $479.9
 $(785.5) $(692.1)
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:  
  
  
  
  
Depreciation and amortization (including amortization netted against equity earnings in affiliates and revenues) 7.3
 714.8
 489.8
 
 1,211.9
Charges (gains) related to other operating expenses and other income (expense) 79.3
 28.0
 (4.4) 
 102.9
Other non-cash and non-operating items, net (497.5) (267.9) (28.9) 785.5
 (8.8)
(Decrease) increase in cash resulting from changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding the effects of acquisitions and dispositions (452.5) 375.1
 136.2
 
 58.8
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (1,732.5)
1,332.6

1,072.6



672.7
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES  
  
  
  
 

Proceeds from dispositions, net of expenses paid and cash disposed 
 10.4
 7.7
 
 18.1
Additions to property and equipment (0.4) (67.9) (125.8) 
 (194.1)
Payments to secure customer service contracts, including outlays for conversion, and capitalized systems development costs (0.9) (123.4) (60.1) 
 (184.4)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired (12.2) 0.1
 
 
 (12.1)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment 
 4.7
 7.1
 
 11.8
Other investing activities 0.3
 6.3
 1.0
 
 7.6
Distributions and dividends from subsidiaries 177.5
 190.6
 
 (368.1) 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 164.3

20.8

(170.1)
(368.1) (353.1)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES  
  
  
  
 

Short-term borrowings, net 
 
 (109.6) 
 (109.6)
Debt modification and related financing costs, net (10.3) 
 
 
 (10.3)
Principal payments on long-term debt (16.5) (66.7) (9.0) 
 (92.2)
Distributions and dividends paid to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest 
 
 (42.0) (182.5) (224.5)
Distributions paid to equity holders 
 
 (373.1) 373.1
 
Purchase of noncontrolling interest 
 
 (23.7) 
 (23.7)
Capital transactions, net (29.8) 
 (177.5) 177.5
 (29.8)
Intercompany 1,433.3
 (1,274.6) (158.7) 
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 1,376.7

(1,341.3)
(893.6)
368.1
 (490.1)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 
 (1.7) (10.8) 
 (12.5)
Change in cash and cash equivalents (191.5)
10.4

(1.9)

 (183.0)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 228.0
 22.6
 357.7
 
 608.3
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $36.5

$33.0

$355.8

$
 $425.3

108



FIRST DATA CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


  Year ended December 31, 2012 (As Adjusted)
(in millions) 
FDC Parent
 Company
 
Guarantor
 Subsidiaries
 
Non-
 Guarantor
 Subsidiaries
 
Consolidation
 Adjustments
 Consolidated
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES  
  
  
  
  
Net (loss) income $(700.9) $447.2
 $521.6
 $(795.2) $(527.3)
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:  
  
  
  
 

Depreciation and amortization (including amortization netted against equity earnings in affiliates and revenues) 8.1
 793.7
 529.1
 
 1,330.9
(Gains) charges related to other operating expenses and other income (expense) 101.9
 20.8
 (0.2) 
 122.5
Other non-cash and non-operating items, net (483.9) (332.2) (19.3) 795.2
 (40.2)
(Decrease) increase in cash resulting from changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding the effects of acquisitions and dispositions (606.0) 590.5
 (103.0) 
 (118.5)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (1,680.8)
1,520.0

928.2


 767.4
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES  
  
  
  
 

Additions to property and equipment (2.6) (70.2) (120.3) 
 (193.1)
Payments to secure customer service contracts, including outlays for conversion, and capitalized systems development costs (0.8) (133.4) (43.0) 
 (177.2)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired (33.0) 0.1
 
 
 (32.9)
Contributions to equity method investments 
 (7.9) 
 
 (7.9)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment 
 2.3
 5.7
 
 8.0
Other investing activities 2.8
 (3.5) 6.7
 
 6.0
Distributions and dividends from subsidiaries 225.5
 218.1
 
 (443.6) 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 191.9

5.5

(150.9)
(443.6) (397.1)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES  
  
  
  
 

Short-term borrowings, net 
 
 99.1
 
 99.1
Debt modification and related financing costs, net 17.3
 
 
 
 17.3
Principal payments on long-term debt (3.4) (56.2) (23.7) 
 (83.3)
Proceeds from sale-leaseback transactions 
 13.8
 
 
 13.8
Distributions and dividends paid to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interest 
 
 (54.0) (207.9) (261.9)
Distributions paid to equity holders 
 
 (424.0) 424.0
 
Purchase of noncontrolling interest 
 
 (25.1) 
 (25.1)
Capital transactions, net (8.4) 
 (227.5) 227.5
 (8.4)
Intercompany 1,549.2
 (1,484.6) (64.6) 
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 1,554.7

(1,527.0)
(719.8)
443.6
 (248.5)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 
 (0.4) 1.2
 
 0.8
Change in cash and cash equivalents 65.8

(1.9)
58.7


 122.6
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 162.2
 24.5
 299.0
 
 485.7
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $228.0

$22.6

$357.7

$
 $608.3

109




FIRST DATA CORPORATION
SCHEDULE II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(dollars, in millions)

    Additions    
Description 
Balance at
 Beginning of
Period
 
Charged
 to Costs and
Expenses
 
Reclassifications
from Other
Accounts (a)
 Deductions (b) 
Balance at
End of
 Period
Year ended December 31, 2014
deducted from receivables
 $42.9
 $98.9
 $(0.5) $81.2
 $60.1
Year ended December 31, 2013
deducted from receivables
 46.0
 93.3
 
 96.4
 42.9
Year ended December 31, 2012
deducted from receivables
 28.4
 83.6
 8.3
 74.3
 46.0
    Additions Deductions  
Description (in millions) 
Balance at
 Beginning of
Period
 
Charged
 to Costs and
Expenses
 Reclassifications from Other Accounts (a)  Write-offs Against Assets 
Balance at
End of
 Period
Year ended December 31, 2017 deducted from receivables $87
 $82
 $1
  $116
 $54
Year ended December 31, 2016 deducted from receivables 83
 85
 1
  82
 87
Year ended December 31, 2015 deducted from receivables 72
 79
 3
  71
 83

(a)Amounts related to reclassifications from other current liabilities"Accounts payable and accrued liabilities" to allowance"Allowance for doubtful accounts.
(b)Amounts related to business divestitures and write-offs against assets.accounts" in the Company's consolidated balance sheets.


110109





ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
 
None. 
ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We have evaluated, under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice President, Director of Finance (principal financial officer),Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2014.2017. This is done in order to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that are filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms.

Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice President, Director of Finance (principal financial officer), concluded that the material weakness described below has been fully remediated and closed and that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2014.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Report of Management

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

OurInternal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors;directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of ourthe Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Because Management recognizes that there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of its inherent limitations,any internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of internal control. Accordingly, even effective internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. All control systems have inherent limitations so that no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues are detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectivenessvary over time.

In order to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, orensure that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of ourCompany’s internal control over financial reporting is effective, management regularly assesses such controls and did so most recently as of December 31, 2014,2017. This assessment was based on the criteria set forthfor effective internal control over financial reporting described in Internal Control- Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) Framework to Internal Control Environment (2013 framework).
Management had previously concluded that it did not design and maintain Based on this assessment, management believes the Company maintained effective controls relating to the accounting and reporting for income taxes and also concluded that this was a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2014. Specifically, the controls in place relating to the establishment and measurement of valuation allowances against deferred tax assets were not properly designed to provide reasonable assurance that our income tax benefit and deferred tax assets and liabilities would be properly recorded and disclosed in the financial statements. This material weakness was initially identified in 2012. At the time, we had an insufficient number of personnel with appropriate knowledge, experience or training in accounting for income taxes. Additionally, the organizational structure resulted in incomplete or inadequate oversight and review of complex issues, calculations and disclosures. As described below, our management has made significant progress in its remediation efforts and the material weakness has been fully remediated as of December 31, 2014.2017.

Based on management’s evaluation under the COSO framework, management concluded that our internal controls over financial reporting were effective as of December 31, 2014.
Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting which is contained below.

111




Remediation of Material Weakness
Since 2012, we have implemented a remediation plan that includes the following actions:
our Tax Department was restructured, key resources were refocused on the most critical areas and additional technical resources were added, including regional tax controllers;
processes, procedures, and controls over income tax accounting were reviewed and modified to ensure greater oversight and transparency; and
implemented a standardized software platform.
We completed a review and detailed testing of our updated processes and based upon the results of this review and testing, we concluded that the material weakness has been fully remediated.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
DuringIn July 2017 and December 2017, we completed our acquisitions of CardConnect and BluePay, which are being integrated into our Global Business Solutions segment. As part of our ongoing integration activities, we are continuing to augment our company-wide controls to reflect the first quarterrisks inherent in the acquisitions. Also, following the October 2017 announcement of 2014,the closure of our Denver and Houston locations, we commenced the migration of certainthe majority of our tax and treasury activities performed in Denver, Coloradoand Telecheck business as well as portions of other functions. This migration continues to Atlanta, Georgia and Melville, New York and certain activities performed in our Captive Shared Service Centers to a Business Process Outsourcer (Migrations). These Migrations continued into the fourth quarter of 2014 and present transitional risks to maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting.

There Other than with respect to these acquisitions and closures, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the above evaluation that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting, other than improvements within our Tax Department discussed above.reporting.




112110





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and StockholderStockholders of First Data Corporation
 
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited First Data Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014,2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control—IntegratedControl-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, First Data Corporation’sCorporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of First Data Corporation as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), cash flows and equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the "financial statements") of the Company and our report dated February 20, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, First Data Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of First Data Corporation as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), cash flows, and equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014 of First Data Corporation and our report dated February 27, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Atlanta, Georgia 
February 27, 201520, 2018 


113111





ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION
 
Our directors do not receive compensation. However, all of our directors are also directors of our parent company, First Data Holdings Inc. (Holdings). On February 24, 2015,15, 2018, the Board of Directors approved Amended and Restated By-laws to clarify that it may modify its committee structure from time to time such as by splitting the Governance, Compensation and Nominations Committee into two separate committees. A copy of the Board of Directors of Holdings approved compensation for each director of Holdings not employed by Holdings or affiliates of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.Amended and Restated By-laws is attached as described in Exhibit 10.123.2 to this Form 10-K.

PART III 
ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Directors

The following table sets forth, as of January 1, 2015, the name and age of each of our directors:
Name Age Director Since
Frank J. Bisignano 55 2013
Joe W. Forehand 66 2009
Henry R. Kravis 71 2009
Heidi G. Miller 61 2014
James E. Nevels 63 2014
Scott C. Nuttall 42 2007
Tagar C. Olson 37 2007
Joseph J. Plumeri 71 2013

The following sets forthAll information about our directors:

Frank J. Bisignano has been Chairman of our Board since March 2014 and Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board since April 2013. Before joining us, Mr. Bisignano was the Co-Chief Operating Officer for JPMorgan Chase & Co. from July 2012 to April 2013, CEO of Mortgage Banking at JP Morgan Chase & Co. from February 2011 until December 2012, and Chief Administrative Officer of JPMorgan Chase & Co. from 2005 until July 2012.

Joe W. Forehand has been a member of our Board since September 2009 and Chairman of the Board from March 2010 to March 2014.  Mr. Forehand was our interim Chief Executive Officer from March 2010 until October 2010.  In his more than 30 years with Accenture Ltd., Mr. Forehand served as the CEO from 1999 until 2004, Before that, as chief executive of the Communications and High Technology Operating Group, and as Chairman of the board of directors of Accenture Ltd. from 2001 until 2006. Mr. Forehandrequired by this Item is a Senior Advisor of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (KKR) and has also been involved with KKR’s growth and emphasis on the technology industry sector. He is a board member of Aricent Inc.
Henry R. Kravis has been a member of our Board since September 2009. Mr. Kravis, a pioneer of the private equity industry, co-founded KKR in 1976 and is its Co-Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer.  He is actively involved in managing KKR and serves on its regional Private Equity Investment and Portfolio Management Committees.  In addition to serving on the board of the general partner of KKR & Co. L.P., Mr. Kravis currently serves on the board of China International Capital Corporation Limited.  He also serves as a director, chairman emeritus or trustee of several cultural, professional and education institutions, including The Business Council, Claremont McKenna, Columbia Business School, the Council on Foreign Relations, Mount Sinai Hospital, the New York City Investment Fund, Partnership for New York City, Rockefeller University, and Tsinghua University School of Economics and Management.  He earned a B.A. from Claremont McKenna College in 1967 and a M.B.A. from the Columbia Business School in 1969.  Mr. Kravis has more than four decades of experience financing, analyzing, and investing in public and private companies, as well as serving on the boards of a number of KKR portfolio companies.
Heidi G. Miller has been a member of our Board since April 2014. Prior to retiring in 2012, Ms. Miller had been president of JPMorgan International, a division of JPMorgan Chase & Co., since June 2010. She served as Executive Vice President, Chief Executive Officer - Treasury and Securities Services of JPMorgan Chase & Co. from January 2004 to June 2010. From 2002 to 2004, Ms. Miller served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Bank One Corporation. Previously, she had been Chief Financial Officer of Citigroup Inc. She is a director of General Mills Inc. and HSBC Holdings plc. Ms. Miller

114




graduated from Princeton University with a bachelor’s degree in history and completed her doctorate in Latin American History at Yale University.

James E. Nevels has been a member of our Board since November 2014. Mr. Nevels is Chairman of The Swarthmore Group, a firm that he founded in 1991. He is also Chairman of The Hershey Company and a director of Hershey Trust Company and the board of managers of Milton Hershey School. In 2004, Mr. Nevels was appointedincorporated by the President of the United States to a three-year term on the advisory committee to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, where he served as Chairman from 2005 to 2007. In 2001, he was appointed by the Governor of Pennsylvania as Chairman of the Philadelphia School Reform Commission overseeing the turnaround of the Philadelphia School System, at that time the ninth-largest school district in the United States. Mr. Nevels has been a member of the board of directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia since January 2010, and served as its Deputy Chairman from January 2012 until his appointment as Chairman in January 2014. Mr. Nevels was formerly a director of Tasty Baking Company from May 2005 to May 2011. He holds a bachelor’s degree, cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa, in political science and philosophy from Bucknell University, a Masters of Business Administration degree from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Pennsylvania Law School.

Scott C. Nuttall has been a member of our Board since September 2007 and is a Member of KKR. Mr. Nuttall joined KKR in 1996 and is head of KKR’s Global Capital and Asset Management Group, which includes Credit, Hedge Funds, KKR Capital Markets and KKR’s Client and Partner Group. He has played a significant role in several of KKR’s private equity investments. Before joining KKR, he was with the Blackstone Group where he was involved in numerous merchant banking and merger and acquisition transactions. He received a B.S., summa cum laude, from the University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Nuttall serves as co-Chair of Teach for America - New York, a non-profit organization that aims to eliminate educational inequity.

Tagar C. Olson has been a member of our Board since September 2007. Mr. Olson joined KKR in 2002 and is a Member and Head of KKR’s Financial Services industry team. Mr. Olson is on the board of directors of Alliant Insurance Services, Santander Consumer USA, Sedgwick, Inc. and Visant Corporation, serves as an observer on the board of directors of WMI Holdings Corp. and is also involved with KKR’s investment in Nephila Capital Ltd. Before joining KKR, Mr. Olson was with Evercore Partners Inc., where he was involved in a number of private equity transactions and mergers and acquisitions. He holds a B.S. and B.A.S., summa cum laude, from the University of Pennsylvania.

Joseph J. Plumeri has been a member of our Board and Senior Advisor of KKR since August 2013 and our Vice Chairman since May 2014. Before joining us, Mr. Plumeri was Chief Executive Officer of Willis Group Holdings plc from October 2000 to January 2013 and Chairman of its Board from 2001 to July 2013. Before joining the Willis Group, Mr. Plumeri spent 32 years as an executive with Citigroup Inc. and its predecessors, where his responsibilities included overseeing the 450 North American retail branches of Citigroup’s Citibank unit. Before that, Mr. Plumeri served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Citigroup’s Primerica Financial Services from 1995 to 1999. In 1994, Mr. Plumeri was appointed Vice Chairman of Citigroup’s predecessor, Travelers Group Inc. In 1993, Mr. Plumeri became the President of a predecessor of Citigroup’s Salomon Smith Barney unit after overseeing the merger of Smith Barney and Shearson and serving as the President and Managing Partner of Shearson since 1990. He also serves on the boards of the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse; Mount Sinai Medical Center; the Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum; the Jackie Robinson Foundation; Carnegie Hall and the Churchill Centre and Museum at the Cabinet War Rooms in London.

Director Qualifications

Our Governance, Compensation and Nominations Committee (Committee) identifies individuals qualified to become members of our Board and recommendsreference to our Board nominees for election as directors at each annual meeting of shareholders and to fill vacancies on the Board. Our Committee looks for certain qualities common to all Board members, including integrity, collegiality, and ability and willingness to make a commitment to us. When considering whether directors and nominees have the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, our Committee and our Board focused primarily on the information discussed in each of the directors’ individual biographies set forth above. With regard to Mr. Bisignano, our Board considered his many years’ of executive experience in the financial industry. With regard to Mr. Forehand, our Board considered his many years’ experience at a publicly held consulting and technology services company, including service as chairman of our board. With regard to Mr. Kravis, our Board considered his significant experience and expertise in private equity investments.
With regard to Ms. Miller, our Board considered her executive experience in the financial services industry and her service as a director of a publicly held company. With regard to Mr. Nevels, our Board considered his expertise in the securities and investment industry with decades of experience in finance, law and corporate governance. With regard to Mr. Nuttall, our Board considered his broad perspective brought by Mr. Nuttall’s involvement in KKR’s diverse investments and his extensive knowledge of our business and capital structure through his involvement since the 2007 merger. With regard to Mr. Olson, our

115




Board considered his expertise in the financial services industry and his extensive knowledge of our business and capital structure through his involvement since the 2007 merger. With regard to Mr. Plumeri, our Board considered his many years’ experience as chief executive officer of a publicly held company.
Executive Officers

The following table sets forth, as of January 1, 2015, the name, age and position of each of our executive officers:
NameAgePosition
Frank J. Bisignano55Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Cynthia A. Armine-Klein53Executive Vice President, Chief Control Officer
Guy Chiarello55President
Sanjiv Das52Executive Vice President, Head of International Regions
Andrew Gelb44Executive Vice President, Head of Financial Services
Thomas Higgins56Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer
Christine E. Larsen53Executive Vice President, Chief Operations Officer
Barry C. McCarthy51Executive Vice President, Head of Consumer and Network Solutions
Michael K. Neborak58Executive Vice President, Director of Finance
Himanshu A. Patel39Executive Vice President, Strategy & Business Development
Joseph J. Plumeri71Vice Chairman
Adam L. Rosman49Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
The following sets forth information about our executive officers, other than Frank Bisignano and Joseph Plumeri, whose qualifications are set forth above:
Cynthia A. Armine-Klein has been our Executive Vice President and Chief Control Officer since May 2014. Before joining us, Ms. Armine-Klein was Executive Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer for JPMorgan Chase & Co. from July 2012 to May 2014. Before joining JPMorgan Chase & Co., she spent 31 years at Citigroup and its predecessor firms and was Citigroup’s Global Chief Compliance Officer from 2008 until 2012.

Guy Chiarello has been our President since July 2013. Before joining us, Mr. Chiarello was the Chief Information Officer of JPMorgan Chase & Co.Proxy Statement for the prior five and a half years and served in various technology roles for Morgan Stanley for 23 years before that.
Sanjiv Das joined us in May 2014 as Executive Vice President and Chief2018 Annual Meeting of Staff and was appointed Head of International Regions in October 2014. Previously, Mr. Das was the CEO and President of CitiMortgage, Inc. from 2008 until May 2013. Before joining Citi, Sanjiv was Managing Director at Morgan Stanley Institutional Securities (Equities) Division.

Andrew Gelb has been our Executive Vice President, Head of Financial Services since November 2014. Before joining us, Gelb spent 17 years at Citigroup Inc. and was Managing Director and Head of North America Treasury and Trade Solutions business from June 2012 until July 2014.  Previously, Mr. Gelb was Head of Securities & Fund Services for EMEA (Europe, Middle East & Africa) of Citigroup Inc. from June 2008 until June 2012.

Thomas Higgins joined us in December 2013 and has been our Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer since May 2014. Before joining us, he was the head of Operational Control at JPMorgan Chase & Co. from January 2011 until December 2013. In 2010, Mr. Higgins retired after a 24-year careerShareholders to be filed with the U.S. Government. He worked in the national security and foreign policy areas and was a member of the Senior Executive Service.

Christine E. Larsen joined us as Executive Vice President and Chief Operations Officer in June 2013. Before joining us, she was Executive Vice President of JPMorgan Chase & Co. since January 2012 responsible for firm-wide process improvement and enterprise program management, with a focus on control and integration efforts. From 2006 to January 2012, she was responsible for various senior operations and technology roles at JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Barry C. McCarthy has been Executive Vice President, Head of Consumer and Network Solutions since November 2014. Previously, Mr. McCarthy was president of our U.S. Financial Services segment from February 2013 until October 2014. Mr. McCarthy joined us in 2004 and has served in various roles of increasing responsibility including head of the merchant product organization, new technologies and general manager of our Asia-Pacific merchant business. Before joining us, he co-

116




founded MagnaCash, a Silicon Valley-based micropayments company, and held various executive roles at VeriSign, Wells Fargo Bank and Procter & Gamble.

Michael K. Neborak has been our Executive Vice President and Director of Finance since July 2014. Previously, Mr. Neborak was Group Chief Financial Officer of Willis Group Holdings plc from July 2010 to June 2014.  Mr. Neborak also served as Chief Financial Officer of MSCI Inc. from 2006 to 2010. Earlier in his career, from 1982 to 2006, Neborak served in roles of increasing responsibility within business units of Citigroup and its predecessor companies. He began his career with Arthur Andersen & Co.
Himanshu A. Patel joined us in June 2013 as Executive Vice President, Strategy & Business Development. Before joining us, he served in various roles at JPMorgan Chase & Co. since 1997, including Senior Equity Analyst from 2001 to 2011.

Adam L. Rosman has been our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since October 2014. Before joining us, Mr. Rosman served as Group General Counsel of Willis Group Holdings plc from May 2012 until September 2014. He joined Willis Group in 2009, serving as Deputy Group General Counsel until May 2012. Previously, Mr. Rosman was Senior Vice President and Associate General Counsel at Cablevision Systems Corporation in Bethpage, NY, and before that he was a partner at the Washington D.C.-based law firm of Zuckerman Spaeder LLP. Between 1997 and 2003, Mr. Rosman was an Assistant United States Attorney in Washington, D.C. He also worked in 2000 and 2001 as Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy Staff Secretary for President Clinton.

Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers

We have adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers which applies to its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer. The Code is available on our website at www.firstdata.com under “About Us”, “Investor Relations” and “Corporate Governance”.
Audit Committee Financial Expert and Recommendation of Directors
Our Audit Committee consists of Ms. Miller and Messrs. Nevels and Olson. Mr. Nevels replaced Mr. Nuttall on February 24, 2015. Our Board of Directors has determined that Ms. Miller and Messrs. Nevels and Olson are audit committee financial experts as defined by regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not have proceduresCommission (SEC) within 120 days after December 31, 2017 and is incorporated herein by which security holders may recommend nominees to our board of directors.reference.

117




ITEM 11.
 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
FIRST DATA CORPORATION
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
FISCAL YEAR 2014
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 2014, we continuedThe information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to broaden and deepen our talent pool to best position ourselves for future growth and advancing the mission of providing solutions to help our clients succeed. Additions to the leadership team in 2014 included: Cynthia Armine-Klein, Chief Control Officer, on May 12, 2014; Sanjiv Das, EVP International Regions, on April 21, 2014; Michael K. Neborak, EVP Director of Finance, on July 14, 2014; and board member Joseph J. Plumeri, Vice Chairman and head of Client Delivery, Innovation and Marketing on June 1, 2014. CompensationProxy Statement for the new executives at First Data was set at a level reflecting their established positions and their decisions2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to forgo other professional opportunities.

Consistent with these appointments, in 2014, the Governance, Compensation and Nominations Committee (the Committee) of First Data Corporation (FDC) reinforced a total compensation philosophy and significantly strengthened the emphasis on equity-based and performance-based pay for its executives and all employees.

In concert with First Data's compensation philosophy based on wealth-creation via equity value creation, the compensation packages of both new and continuing executives in 2014 were structured to be predominantly in the form of First Data equity. Messrs. Neborak and Plumeri made personal investments in First Data stock during 2014. Equity heavy compensation practices also ensure executive alignment with the long-term interests of the Company, its clients and shareholders.

2014 was a foundational year for First Data, with a number of significant accomplishments. First Data Holdings Inc. (Holdings), the parent company of FDC completed a $3.5 billion capital raise, and contributed approximately $2.5 billion of capital to FDC to strengthen our balance sheet. Many of First Data's businesses experienced growth in revenue and profitability during 2014, including credit and retail private label processing, output services and STAR network in the Financial Services segment; Money Network and TransArmor in the Merchant Solutions segment and many geographies and markets in the International segment. New innovative and powerful products designed to help clients grow their businesses - Clover Station and Insightics - were launched. The acquisitions of Gyft and Perka further expanded our suite of innovative products for consumers and businesses. We partnered with Apple to support Apple Pay.
Developments:
On March 10, 2014, Frank Bisignano was voted Chairman of First Data’s Board of Directors, in addition to his role as Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Bisignano assumed the role from Joe Forehand, who had served as First Data chairman since March, 2010, and remains on the First Data Board of Directors. 
On May 13, 2014, First Data’s Board of Directors named Joseph J. Plumeri Vice Chairman of First Data and on June 1, 2014 Mr. Plumeri was hired by the Company to lead Client Delivery, Innovation, and Marketing.
On April 17, 2014, we announced the departure of Ray E. Winborne, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer.

ROLE OF THE COMMITTEE
The Committee reviews and approves all aspects of the Company’s compensation programs for its executive officers. Specifically, under its charter, the Committee:
·establishes the Company’s compensation philosophy;
·evaluates performance and sets compensation for the Company’s executive officers;
·oversees regulatory compliance with respect to compensation matters; and
·delegates to and monitoring various subcommittees with responsibility for administrative and legal compliance for retirement and benefit plans.
During 2014, the Committee was comprised of Scott C. Nuttall (Chairperson), Joe W. Forehand, and Henry R. Kravis. All of the foregoing individuals are affiliated with Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (KKR) and, therefore, not deemed independent Directors. Disclosure of payments between the Company and KKR affiliates is included in Item 13 “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence” of this Form 10-K.

118




The equity compensation provided to the senior executives of the Company is approved by the Holdings Committee. The FDC Committee is comprised of the same individuals as are members of the Holdings Committee.
ROLE OF MANAGEMENT
The Company’s management provides information, data, analysis, updates, and recommendations to the Committee. Specifically, management provides recommendations on pay levels for executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer as well as the design of all material compensation and benefit plans. Finally, management is responsible for the administration of the Company’s executive compensation programs and policies.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
Executive Compensation Philosophy
The Company’s executive compensation philosophy and corresponding pay practices are designed to align executives tightly with the Company’s growth objectives, resulting in increased value for shareholders. This alignment is created via equity compensation and annual incentive compensation, the value of which is driven by company performance over the long and short term, respectively. All executives, including those hired in 2014 maintain a significant equity stake in the Company.
When considering the design of the Company’s compensation plans, incentive plan funding schemes, and individual compensation decisions, the Committee considers several principles.
·Focus on total compensation, rather than individual pay components.
·Align realized compensation with company performance.
·Emphasize equity ownership as largest component of compensation.
·Pay at a competitive market position in order to attract and retain the best available talent.
Focus on Total Compensation
We have a strong commitment to rewarding all executives, and all employees, on a total compensation basis. Rather than focus on individual pay components, we emphasize total compensation opportunities. For executives, management and the Committee believe that a large majority of these total compensation opportunities should be delivered via equity. This philosophy is reflected in the hiring packages for new executives and other 2014 compensation decisions described below.
Align Realized Compensation with Company Performance
The Committee places a great emphasis on the alignment of compensation with company performance and shareholder value.  Executives should see realized compensation rise or fall based on the performance of the Company. With a significant portion of compensation opportunities derived from equity, and further because FDC equity is not liquid until a public offering or other liquidity event is achieved, the linkage between compensation value and Company performance is very strong. Additionally, our annual cash incentive plan for executives, the Senior Executive Incentive Plan (SEIP) is funded each year based solely on company performance.
Emphasize Equity Ownership
The Committee provides equity compensation and opportunities so that executives have a significant equity stake in the Company to ensure complete alignment with shareholders, strong correlation between company performance and executive compensation, and complete focus on our goals.
The 2007 Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees of First Data Corporation and its Affiliates (the 2007 Equity Plan) facilitates significant equity ownership by executive officers. All executive officers have either directly purchased shares of stock or relinquished equity of their former employer in connection with the Holding equity grants. The Committee believes that by requiring a personal investment in Holdings, the 2007 Equity Plan is a powerful mechanism to facilitate equity ownership and closely align executive and shareholder interests. To ensure equity remains the predominant compensation component for executives and to strengthen long-term alignment, executives also receive annual equity grants.
As a further demonstration of the Committee’s commitment to equity ownership as a path to align the interests of its owner-associates with the long-term success of the Company and our clients, the Committee approved broad-based equity grants in

119




the first quarter of both 2014 and 2015. Management and the Committee believe that creating a strong culture of ownership will benefit its clients, owner-associates and shareholders.
Pay at a Competitive Market Position
The Committee ensures that incoming and incumbent executives are paid competitively. In order to successfully attract and retain top performing executives, the Company annually reviews market data and aims to provide competitive total compensation opportunities.  In light of recent hiring, the Company and Committee have also gained significant insight into current compensation practices among peer companies and have leveraged this information along with peer group analysis in making pay decisions.
The Company and the Committee periodically review the Company’s executive compensation practices against a peer group of companies. The Company’s peer group is comprised of direct competitors, frequently identified peer companies to the Company’s direct competitors, and other companies deemed comparable to the Company in terms of industry, pay practices, revenue and market value. The peer group includes the following 21 companies:
ŸAccentureŸADPŸAmerican Express
ŸCapital One FinancialŸComputer Sciences Corp.ŸDiscover Financial
ŸeBayŸFidelity Nat’l Info ServicesŸFifth Third Bancorp
ŸFiservŸMasterCardŸPNC Financial Services
ŸSAICŸSLM Corp.ŸState Street Corp.
ŸSunTrust BanksŸSymantec Corp.ŸTotal System Services
ŸVISAŸWestern UnionŸYahoo!
Competitive benchmarks for each of the Company’s executive officers are created by utilizing available information disclosed in proxy statements of these companies in combination with generally available market compensation survey information. It is important to note that compensation data from non-peer group companies is also given significant consideration since the Company also recruits talent from organizations outside the payments industry.

ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION
Compensation for the Company’s executive officers is delivered through:
base salary;
annual cash incentives;
equity; and
perquisites.

Base Salary
Base salaries for executives reflect market competitive levels of pay and factors unique to each executive such as scope of responsibilities, individual skill set, experience level, time in role, pay relative to internal peers, and base pay in previous roles outside of First Data. Base pay for named executives as of December 31, 2014 is as follows: 
 
Base Salary as of
December 31, 2014
Frank J. Bisignano, Chief Executive Officer$1,500,000
Michael K. Neborak, Executive Vice President, Director of Finance600,000
Cynthia Armine-Klein, Chief Control Officer500,000
Sanjiv Das, Executive Vice President, Head of International Regions750,000
Joseph J. Plumeri, Vice Chairman1,200,000

120




Annual Cash Incentives
Plan Design and Mechanics
Executive officers are eligible to receive a performance-based annual cash incentive under the SEIP. Consistent with First Data's overall compensation philosophy, cash awards are generally a small percentage relative to equity-based awards for executives.

Awards are based primarily on Company performance during the fiscal year and secondarily on individual results during the year. To best accomplish this, the Committee approved a fully discretionary funding structure for 2014 for the SEIP. This structure was deemed most appropriate to ensure the Committee maintained the discretion and ability to appropriately reward the performance of each executive.
The Committee has approved cash bonuses for the 2014 plan year as follows. At the time of hiring, Ms. Armine-Klein and Mr. Das were each offered a minimum cash incentive, but both subsequently agreed to waive their minimum cash incentive for 2014. For 2015, no executives have any minimum cash incentive amounts and all awards are completely performance based.
 2014 SEIP Payout
Frank J. Bisignano$1,140,000
Michael K. Neborak400,000
Cynthia Armine-Klein625,000
Sanjiv Das625,000
Joseph J. Plumeri540,000
Equity
As described above, equity compensation is at the heart of the Company’s compensation philosophy. Incumbent executives received equity awards in 2014 to further bolster the role equity plays in their total compensation opportunity. Mr. Plumeri and Mr. Neborak made personal investments to purchase shares of stock and received option grants. Mr. Plumeri, also received a 2014 restricted stock grant based on his contributions during 2013 as a senior advisor.
Ms. Armine-Klein and Mr. Das received restricted stock and option grants to replace equity holdings forfeited due to departing their previous employer.
Annual grants were made to Mr. Bisignano and Mr. Winborne on February 10, 2014, with amounts determined in the sole discretion of the Committee based on each executive’s role and performance. These equity awards were granted under the 2007 Equity Plan and were comprised of both options and restricted stock awards.
Executives hired during 2014, also received the following equity awards. All stock options granted during 2014 have a strike price of $4.00 per share.

121





 Grant Date Stock Options Granted 
Stock Option
Vesting
 Restricted  Stock Granted Restricted Stock Vesting
Frank Bisignano2/10/2014 750,000
 33% per year 1,125,000
 Later of 1/1/17 and expiration of lockup period following a Qualified Public Offering
          
Michael K. Neborak7/14/2014 500,000
 20% per year 
  
8/11/2014 750,000
 20% per year 
  
          
Ray E. Winborne2/10/2014 109,375
 33% per year 164,063
 Later of 1/1/17 and expiration of lockup period following a Qualified Public Offering
          
Cindy Armine-Klein5/13/2014 500,000
 20% per year 750,000
 Later of 5/13/17 and expiration of lockup period following a Qualified Public Offering
          
Sanjiv Das5/13/2014 1,000,000
 20% per year 500,000
 Later of 5/13/17 and expiration of lockup period following a Qualified Public Offering
          
Joseph J. Plumeri2/10/2014 
  750,000
 Later of 1/1/17 and expiration of lockup period following a Qualified Public Offering
5/13/2014 2,000,000
 33% per year 
  

A Qualified Public Offering is defined in the Management Stockholder Agreement to which all restricted shares are subject as an initial Public Offering (i) for which aggregate cash proceeds to be received by the Company (or any successor thereto) from such offering (or series of offerings) (without deducting underwriter discounts, expenses and commissions) are at least $400,000,000, or (ii) pursuant to which at least 35% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock are sold by the Company (or any successor thereto).

General Provisions for Options and Purchased Shares under the 2007 Equity Plan and Management Stockholder Agreement
If an option holder terminates employment with the Company for any reason, all options are subject to call rights by Holdings until a Change in Control or a Qualified Public Offering, as defined in the 2007 Equity Plan and Management Stockholder Agreement.
If an option holder’s employment is terminated due to Death, Disability, Good Reason or Not for Cause (as defined in the 2007 Equity Plan), call rights may be exercised on vested options at the fair market value share price. In this event, shares obtained through previous option exercises may be called at the fair market value share price. In the event of Death or Disability, the option holder has a put right to exchange vested options for the difference of the fair market value and the option exercise price.

If the option holder’s employment is terminated voluntarily or for Cause (as defined in the 2007 Equity Plan), call rights may be exercised on vested options at the lesser of the fair market value share price or the option exercise price. In this event, shares obtained through previous option exercises may be called at the lesser of the fair market value share price or the option exercise price. In the case of involuntary termination for Cause, call rights may be exercised on purchased shares at the lesser of the fair market value share price or the original purchase price. In the case of voluntary termination, call rights may be exercised on purchased shares at the fair market value share price. These provisions greatly enhance the retention of executives who participate in the 2007 Equity Plan by eliminating all potential option gains for executives who voluntarily terminate prior to a Liquidity Event.
An initial Public Offering or sale of FDC has no impact on options vesting unless the Sponsor’s (KKR’s) stake drops to a level below 10% of their original investment. If it does, then all options granted in 2011 and later become 100% vested. If the sale of FDC results in a Change in Control whereby the sponsor stake drops below 50% and the sponsor no longer controls a majority of the Board all call rights are eliminated and options granted in 2011 and forward become 100% vested. For options granted in 2010 and prior, the vesting of all time options is fully accelerated upon a Change in Control or a Liquidity Event, as defined in the 2007 Equity Plan.

Holdings has a right of first refusal if an executive proposes to sell their purchased stock prior to a Change in Control or a Liquidity Event. If a shareholder’s employment is terminated involuntarily or due to Death, Disability, Good Reason or Not for Cause (as defined in the 2007 Equity Plan), call rights may be exercised on purchased shares at the fair market value share

122




price. In the event of Death or Disability, the shareholder has a put right to sell shares back to Holdings at the fair market value share price.

Grant Process
All equity grants were made under the 2007 Equity Plan, and granted at the then-current fair market value on the date of each grant. Fair market value was determined by the full Holdings Board at the time of grant. Equity grants were made on the date the grants were approved by the Holdings Committee.
Perquisites
The Company’s compensation philosophy is to focus on performance-based forms of compensation while providing only minimal executive benefits and perquisites.  Reimbursement for relocation and moving expenses are offered to the Company’s executive officers. Executives are also authorized to use the corporate aircraft for personal purposes in limited instances.
The financial planning benefit previously offered to all executives was terminated in 2013. Per his employment agreement, Mr. Bisignano is eligible for up to $100,000 per year of financial planning assistance; however, this benefit was only partially used in 2014 and reported in perquisites.
Retirement Plans
In 2014, all employees in the U.S., including executive officers, were eligible to participate in the First Data Corporation Incentive Savings Plan (ISP). The ISP is a qualified 401(k) plan designed to comply with Internal Revenue Service (IRS) safe harbor rules. The Company maintains the ISP to allow employees to save for their retirement on a pre-tax basis.
The ISP allows for company contributions to help employees build retirement savings. Beginning January 1, 2014, the company match has been suspended for all employees, including executives.
We do not currently offer defined benefit plans or non-qualified retirement plans to our executive officers.

SEVERANCE AND CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENTS
In general, the Company does not enter into employment agreements with employees, including the Company’s executive officers, except in the case of Mr. Bisignano. A description of this agreement is provided below. All current executive officers serve at the will of the Board. 
The Company believes that reasonable and appropriate severance and Change in Control benefits are necessary in order to be competitive in the Company’s executive attraction and retention efforts. Information regarding applicable payments under such agreements for the named executive officers is provided in the Severance Benefit table.

The Policy provides for the payment of benefits to executive officers upon involuntary termination without cause from FDC with or without a Change of Control. Under the Policy, no benefits are provided based solely on a Change in Control. The Policy provides for payment of benefits as described below:
(i)For executive officers appointed prior to May 1, 2011, or having 5 years or more service in such a position: total cash payments equal to the executive officer’s base pay plus prior year bonus multiplied by 2.
For executive officers appointed on or after May 1, 2011 and having 2 to 5 years of service in such a position: total cash payments equal to the executive officer’s base pay plus prior year bonus multiplied by 1.5.
For executive officers appointed on or after May 1, 2011 and having less than 2 years of service in such a position: total cash payments equal to the executive officer’s base pay for one year.
(ii)A cash payment equal to the executive officer’s prior year bonus prorated for the year of termination.
(iii)Continuation of medical, dental and vision benefits coverage for the severance period, with a portion of the costs of the benefits paid by the executive officer.

123




(iv)A “Gross-Up Payment” is made if it is determined that any Internal Revenue Code Section 280G parachute payments provided by the Company to or, on behalf of, an eligible executive would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Internal Revenue Code Section 4999. The Gross-Up Payment is an amount so that after payment of all taxes, the eligible executive retains an amount equal to the Excise Tax imposed by Internal Revenue Code Section 4999. Executives are eligible for this benefit regardless of whether their employment is terminated following a Change in Control.
As a condition to receiving severance benefits under the Policy, all employees are required to release FDC and its employees from all claims they may have against them and agree to a number of restrictive covenants which are structured to protect the Company from potential loss of customers or employees and to prohibit the release of confidential company information.

On November 12, 2014 the Committee adopted amendments to the plan which are effective on January 1, 2015. Under the new terms, the cash severance payment for all eligible participants is equal to one year's base pay plus the prior year's cash bonus and a prorated portion of the prior year's cash bonus based on time worked during the year of termination.
OTHER BENEFIT PLANS
All executive officers are also eligible to participate in the employee benefit plans and programs generally available to the Company’s employees, including coverage under the Company’s medical, dental, life and disability insurance plans.
EMPLOYMENT AND TERMINATION AGREEMENTS WITH FDC EXECUTIVES

Employment Agreement with Mr. Bisignano
On April 28, 2013, First Data and Holdings entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Bisignano (the Employment Agreement). A copy of the Employment Agreement is reported on the Form 8-K. The Employment Agreement was included as Exhibit 10.1 to FDC’s Form 8-K filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on May 2, 2013. The Employment Agreement provides for an initial five-year term from the Commencement Date and automatic one-year extensionsSEC within 120 days after such time unless terminated by either party with prior written notice. Under the terms of the Employment Agreement, Mr. Bisignano will earn an annual base salary of $1,500,000, which base salary may be increased but not decreased; and commencing with the 2014 fiscal year, be eligible to receive a discretionary annual incentive payment in such amount as determined in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of First Data, based upon its assessment of Mr. Bisignano’s performance, payable in the form of cash, equity-based awards or a combination thereof. Mr. Bisignano will be eligible to receive executive perquisites, fringe and other benefits consistent with what is provided to executives.

Separation Agreement with Mr. Winborne
On August 5, 2014, First Data and Holdings entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Winborne, former Chief Financial Officer. The agreement provides severance benefits equal to $1,475,000 paid semi-monthly over a twelve month period beginning October 1, 2014 and continued coverage under First Data benefits during the same period. A prorated 2014 bonus of $600,000 was paid following termination on September 30, 2014. Mr. Winborne will continue holding and earning vesting in all equity holdings through December 15, 2015. Following December 31, 2015, call rights on all vested equity holding will be exercised at fair market value if no Liquidity Event has occurred prior to this date.2017 and is incorporated herein by reference.
TAX AND ACCOUNTING CONSIDERATIONS
During 2014, Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) limitations on tax deductibility of compensation did not apply to FDC as the Company’s common stock is not registered or publicly traded. The Committee has not considered Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) deductibility limitations in the planning of 2014 compensation since they do not apply.


124




DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Name 
Fees Earned or
Paid in
Cash
 
Stock
Awards
 
Option
Awards
 
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
 
Change in
Pension Value
and
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
 
All Other
Compensation
 Total
Joe W. Forehand (1) $318,333
 $125,000
 $1,076,000
 $
 $
 $20,806
 $1,540,139
Henry R. Kravis 40,000
 
 
 
 
 
 40,000
Scott C. Nuttall 40,000
 
 
 
 
 
 40,000
Tagar C. Olson 40,000
 
 
 
 
 
 40,000
Heidi Miller (2) 56,250
 125,000
 1,045,500
 
 
 
 1,226,750
James Nevels (3) 18,750
 125,000
 1,147,500
 
 
 
 1,291,250

FDC Directors do not receive compensation. The Board of Directors of Holdings has approved an annual cash retainer for each non-employee director of Holdings associated with KKR, Mr. Kravis, Mr. Nuttall and Mr. Olson of $40,000 per year; and a yearly cash retainer of $75,000 for all other non-employee directors, Mr. Forehand, Ms. Miller and Mr. Nevels. Mr. Forehand received additional fees for his Chairman of the Board duties prior to March 10, 2014 when Mr. Bisignano was appointed Chairman.
All Directors are eligible to defer their retainer in the First Data Holdings Inc. 2008 Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan (Director Deferred Comp Plan). Mr. Kravis, Mr. Forehand, Mr. Nuttall, Mr. Olson, and Ms. Miller elected to defer their retainer earned in 2014. Deferrals in the Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan track the value of shares of Holdings and are payable to participants only upon Separation of Service or Death.
(1)Joe Forehand received a cash retainer of $133,333 and cash bonus of $110,000 for service as Chairman prior to March 10, 2014 and a $75,000 retainer for non-Chairman service following March 10, 2014. Mr. Forehand also had $20,806 in corporate aircraft usage.
(2)Heidi Miller’s retainer for 2014 was prorated based on her appointment on April 14, 2014.
(3)James Nevels' retainer for 2014 was prorated based on his appointment on November 12, 2014.

Reimbursements
Directors are reimbursed for their expenses incurred in attending Board, committee and shareholder meetings, including those for travel, meals and lodging. Directors are also reimbursed for their expenses incurred in attending director education programs. The Company also provided office space and administrative support for Mr. Plumeri in support of performance of his duties as a senior advisor from January through May 2014.
Indemnification
The Company’s Certificate of Incorporation provides that the Company shall indemnify and hold harmless each director to the fullest extent permitted or authorized by the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
REPORT OF THE GOVERNANCE, COMPENSATION AND NOMINATIONS COMMITTEE
The Governance, Compensation and Nominations Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Governance, Compensation and Nominations Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
GOVERNANCE, COMPENSATION AND NOMINATIONS COMMITTEE
Scott C. Nuttall (Chairperson)
Henry R. Kravis
Joe W. Forehand


125




SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Name and Principal
Position
 Year Salary (1) 
Bonus
(2)
 
Stock
Awards
(3)
 
Option
Awards
 (4)
 
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
 
Change in
Pension Value
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
 
All Other
Compensation
(5)
 Total
Frank J. Bisignano, Chief Executive Officer 2014 $1,500,000
 $1,140,000
 $4,500,000
 $1,629,000
 $
 $
 $533,199
 $9,302,199
 2013 1,045,839
 3,704,161
 20,000,002
 50,994,285
 
 
 635,234
 76,379,521
                   
Michael K. Neborak, Executive Vice President, Director of Finance 2014 279,615
 400,000
 
 2,680,000
 
 
 1,183
 3,360,798
                   
Ray E. Winborne, Former Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer 2014 506,250
 
 656,252
 237,563
 
 
 2,088,435
 3,488,500
 2013 662,500
 1,000,000
 675,000
 795,728
 
 
 14,386
 3,147,614
 2012 600,000
 510,000
 249,999
 265,667
 
 
 30,926
 1,656,592
                   
Cynthia Armine-Klein, Chief Control Officer 2014 320,192
 3,625,000
 3,000,000
 1,003,000
 
 
 673
 7,948,865
                   
Sanjiv Das, Executive Vice President and Head of International Regions 2014 523,077
 2,125,000
 2,000,000
 2,006,000
 
 
 1,288
 6,655,365
                   
Joseph J. Plumeri, Vice Chairman 2014 1,239,288
 540,000
 3,000,000
 4,012,000
 
 
 6,273
 8,797,561
(1)Salary for Mr. Plumeri includes consulting income of $639,288 earned while acting as senior advisor to First Data prior to being hired as Vice Chairman and Head of Client Delivery, Innovation and Marketing on June 1, 2014.
(2)Amounts reflect approved 2014 payouts under the Senior Executive Incentive Plan. In addition to those payouts, during 2014, Mr. Das received a cash sign-on bonus of $1,500,000, and Ms. Armine-Klein received a cash sign-on bonus of $3,000,000.
(3)The table reflects the grant date fair value of all restricted shares used for financial reporting purposes and awarded under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees of First Data Corporation and its Affiliates. For further information on stock awards granted in 2014, see the Grant of Plan-Based Awards Table.
(4)The table reflects the grant date fair value of all stock options used for financial reporting purposes and awarded under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees of First Data Corporation and its Affiliates and is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. For further information on options granted in 2014, see the Grant of Plan-Based Awards Table.
(5)Full explanation of these amounts is provided in the Perquisite and Personal Benefits Table and accompanying footnotes.


126




PERQUISITE AND PERSONAL BENEFITS
Name Year 
Financial
Planning
(1)
 
Employee
Stock
Purchase
Plan
 
Defined
Contribution
Plans
 
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
 
Life
Insurance
(2)
 
Tax
Gross-Up
Payments
(3)
 
Severance
Payments
(4)
 
Relocation
Benefits
(5)
 
Other
Compensation
(6)
 Total
                       
Frank J. Bisignano 2014 $18,812
 $
 $265
 $
 $4,902
 $270,017
 $
 $52,384
 $186,819
 $533,199
  2013 
 
 2,750
 
 1,639
 191,029
 
 264,674
 175,142
 635,234
                       
Michael K. Neborak 2014 
 
 
 
 1,183
 
 
 
 
 1,183
                       
Ray E. Winborne 2014 
 
 
 
 984
 1,683
 2,085,768
 
 
 2,088,435
  2013 
 
 8,925
 
 990
 1,491
 
 
 2,980
 14,386
  2012 10,000
 
 8,750
 
 660
 8,923
 
 
 2,593
 30,926
                       
Cynthia Armine-Klein 2014 
 
 
 
 673
 
 
 
 
 673
                       
Sanjiv Das 2014 
 
 
 
 1,288
 
 
 
 
 1,288
                       
Joseph J. Plumeri 2014 
 
 
 
 
 1,831
 
 
 4,442
 6,273
(1)In 2014, only Mr. Bisignano was eligible for financial planning benefits.
(2)Includes the value of imputed income on life insurance premiums paid by the Company.
(3)For 2014, Mr. Bisignano received tax gross-ups based on imputed income from relocation benefits $78,691; car lease $8,787; ex-spouse health insurance coverage and life/disability coverage for Mr. Bisignano $46,106; $132,181 for personal aircraft usage; $3,082 for travel to President's Club; $1,145 for auto gross-up; and $25 for a benefits correction. Mr. Plumeri and Mr. Winborne received tax gross-ups in the amounts of $1,831 for travel to President's Club and $1,683 for aircraft usage, respectively.
(4)On July 29, 2014, Mr. Winborne entered into a Separation Agreement whereby he received a prorated 2014 bonus of $600,000, semi-monthly payments for one year totaling $1,475,000 and benefits coverage for one year valued at $10,768.
(5)
Mr. Bisignano received temporary living expenses in the amount of $52,384.

(6)
Mr. Bisignano received reimbursement for a vehicle lease in the amount of $21,970, health insurance coverage for his ex-spouse of $3,954, insurance premiums of $49,204 and personal use of corporate aircraft valued at $109,080.Mr. Bisignano and Mr. Plumeri each received $2,611 for spouse’s expenses related to company functions. The calculation of incremental cost for personal use of the corporate aircraft includes the average hourly variable costs of operating the aircraft for the year attributed to the named executive officer’s personal flight activity.


127




GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
Name Grant  Date 
Estimated
Future
Payouts
Under
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plans
 
Estimated
Future
Payouts
Under
Equity
Incentive
Plans
 
All Other
Stock Awards:
Number of
Shares of Stock or Units (#) (1)
 
All Other
Option Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options (#)
(2)
 
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
 
Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards (3)
 
Market
Close
Price per
Share
                 
Frank J. Bisignano 2/10/2014 
 
 1,125,000
 
 $
 $4,500,000
 $4.00
  2/10/2014 
 
 
 750,000
 4.00
 1,629,000
 4.00
                 
Michael K. Neborak 7/14/2014 
 
 
 500,000
 4.00
 1,072,000
 4.00
 8/11/2014 
 
 
 750,000
 4.00
 1,608,000
 4.00
                 
Ray E. Winborne 2/10/2014 
 
 164,063
 
 
 656,252
 4.00
  2/10/2014 
 
 
 109,375
 4.00
 237,563
 4.00
                 
Cynthia Armine-Klein 5/13/2014 
 
 750,000
 
 
 3,000,000
 4.00
 5/13/2014 
 
 
 500,000
 4.00
 1,003,000
 4.00
                 
Sanjiv Das 5/13/2014 
 
 500,000
 
 
 2,000,000
 4.00
  5/13/2014 
 
 
 1,000,000
 4.00
 2,006,000
 4.00
                 
Joseph J. Plumeri 2/10/2014 
 
 750,000
 
 
 3,000,000
 4.00
  5/13/2014 
 
 
 2,000,000
 4.00
 4,012,000
 4.00
(1)Grants reflected in this column are grants of Restricted Stock made under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees of First Data Corporation and its Affiliates. Grants made to Mr. Bisignano, Mr. Plumeri and Mr. Winborne vest upon the later of January 1, 2017 and the end of any lockup period following a Qualified Public Offering. Grants made to Ms. Armine-Klein and Mr. Das vest upon the later of May 13, 2017 and the end of any lockup period following a Qualified Public Offering.
(2)Grants reflected in this column are grants of Stock Options made under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees of First Data Corporation and its Affiliates. The grant price was determined at the time of the grant by the Board, pursuant to their authority under the plan, to be $4.00. Option grant dated May 13, 2014 to Mr. Plumeri for 2,000,000 options vest in equal annual installments, one-third per year, over a three year period from the grant date and have a ten-year term. All other option grants to executive officers vest in equal annual installments, 20% per year, over a five year period from the grant date designated and have a ten-year term.
(3)Grant Date Fair Value for restricted stock and options is based on their valuation for financial reporting purposes at the time of grant. This grant is subject to all terms and conditions of the Management Stockholders Agreement.


128




OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
Option Awards
Name Company(1) 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
 (#)
Un-exercisable
(2)
 
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#)
 
Option
Exercise
Price
 
Option
Expiration
Date
 
Number of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
(#) (3)
 
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
 (3)
 
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned Shares, 
Units or Other
Rights That Have
Not Vested (#)
 
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That Have
Not Vested
Frank J. Bisignano Holdings 5,257,142
 21,028,572
 
 $3.50
 5/7/2023
 
 $
 
 $
  Holdings 
 750,000
 
 4.00
 2/10/2024
 
 
 
 
  Holdings 
 
 
 
 
 1,125,000
 5,062,500
 
 
                     
Michael K. Neborak Holdings 
 500,000
 
 4.00
 7/14/2024
 
 
 
 
  Holdings 
 750,000
 
 4.00
 8/11/2024
 
 
 
 
                     
Ray E. Winborne Holdings 45,000
 11,250
 
 3.00
 6/23/2020
 
 
 
 
  Holdings 355,000
 88,750
 
 3.00
 2/1/2021
 
 
 
 
  Holdings 160,000
 
 
 3.00
 3/8/2021
 
 
 
 
  Holdings 111,111
 55,556
 
 3.00
 3/3/2022
 
 
 
 
  Holdings 128,571
 257,143
 
 3.50
 3/5/2023
 
 
 
 
  Holdings 
 109,375
 
 4.00
 2/10/2024
 
 
 
 
  Holdings 
 
 
 
 
 80,000
 360,000
 
 
  Holdings 
 
 
 
 
 83,333
 374,999
 
 
  Holdings 
 
 
 
 
 192,857
 867,857
 
 
  Holdings 
 
 
 
 
 164,063
 738,284
 
 
                     
Cynthia Armine-Klein Holdings 
 500,000
 
 4.00
 5/13/2024
 
 
 
 
  Holdings 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
Sanjiv Das Holdings 
 1,000,000
 
 4.00
 5/13/2024
 
 
 
 
  Holdings 
 
 
 
 
 500,000
 2,250,000
 
 
                     
Joseph J. Plumeri Holdings 333,333
 666,667
 
 3.50
 10/12/2023
 
 
 
 
  Holdings 
 2,000,000
 
 4.00
 5/13/2024
 
 
 
 
  Holdings 
 
 
 
 
 750,000
 3,375,000
 
 
(1)All Holdings equity awards were granted under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees of First Data Corporation and its Affiliates.
(2)Grants reflected in this column are grants of Stock Options made under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees of First Data Corporation and its Affiliates. All Stock Options listed that were granted during and prior to 2010 are time-based and vest in equal annual installments 20% each year over a five year period; stock options granted in 2011 and later are time-based and vest in equal annual installments of 1/3 per year over three years, except as noted below. Stock Option grants for Ms. Armine-Klein and Mr. Das on 5/13/2014 vest in equal annual installments 20% each year over a five year period.
(3)
All grants reflected in this column are awards of Restricted Stock made under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees of First Data Corporation and its Affiliates. All restricted shares granted in 2010 vest only upon the lapse of transfer restrictions under the 2007 Equity Plan and Management Stockholder Agreement. Restricted Stock Award vesting terms are described in footnote 1 of the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. Market value of the shares is based on the per share price of $4.50 as of December 31, 2014, as determined by the Board of Directors for purposes of the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees of First Data Corporation and its Affiliates.

129




OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
During 2014, no executive officers exercised options or had any restricted stock awards which vested.
PENSION BENEFITS
During 2014, no executive officers participated in either a qualified or non-qualified defined benefit plan sponsored by the Company.
NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION
During 2014, no executive officers participated in a non-qualified deferred compensation plan sponsored by the Company.
SEVERANCE BENEFITS (1)
Name 
Cash
Payments
(2)
 
Health &
Welfare
Benefits
(3)
 
Financial
Planning
 
Unvested
Stock
Options
(4)
 
Unvested
Restricted
Stock
 (5)
 
Estimated
280G Tax
Gross-Up
 Total
Frank J. Bisignano $9,500,000
 $21,536
 $
 $
 $1,406,250
 $
 $10,927,786
Michael K. Neborak 1,000,000
 9,474
 
 
 
 
 1,009,474
Cindy Armine-Klein 1,125,000
 9,891
 
 
 937,500
 
 2,072,391
Sanjiv Das 1,375,000
 5,779
 
 
 625,000
 
 2,005,779
Joe Plumeri 1,740,000
 9,250
 
 
 937,500
 
 2,686,750

(1)Benefits represented reflect a termination date of January 1, 2015 and the terms of the Policy which are effective as of January 1, 2015.

(2)Mr. Bisignano’s employment agreement stipulates he would receive the greater of $9,500,000 or two times the sum of his base pay and average of his last two annual incentive payments. All other executives receive a severance benefit of one times current base pay and most recent annual bonus.
(3)Represents the company-paid portion of Medical, Dental and Vision benefits for each executive for a period of one year.
(4)Stock Option vesting is not accelerated under any of the severance scenarios.
(5)The terms of Restricted Stock Awards issued to named executives provide that awards will vest based on number of months completed since grant divided by 36 months following a severance-eligible departure from the Company.
As a condition to receiving severance benefits under the Policy, all employees are required to release FDC and its employees from all claims they may have against them and agree to a number of restrictive covenants which are structured to protect the Company from potential loss of customers or employees and prohibit the release of confidential company information.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the Company’s Governance, Compensation and Nominations Committee members have been an officer or employee of the Company at any time, except for Joe W. Forehand who served as interim CEO during 2010. During 2014, the Company had no compensation committee interlocks.

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Equity Compensation Plan Information
We do not have any compensation plans under whichThe information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our common stock mayProxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be issued. First Data Holdings Inc., our parent company, has adoptedfiled with the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees of First Data Corporation and its Affiliates under which common stock of First Data Holdings Inc. may be issued. The following table contains certain information regarding options, warrants or rights to common stock of First Data Holdings Inc. under the plan as ofSEC within 120 days after December 31, 2014.

1302017 and is incorporated herein by reference.




Plan Category 
Number of securities
 to be issued
 upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)
 
Weighted- average
 exercise price of
 outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b)
 
Number of securities
remaining available
 for future issuance
 under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities reflected in column (a))
(c) (1)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 103,703,653
 $3.40
 4,688,234
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 
 
 
Total 103,703,653
 $3.40
 4,688,234

(1)On January 14, 2015, an additional 100 million shares were authorized.

Beneficial Ownership
All of our outstanding stock is held by First Data Holdings Inc. The following table sets forth, as of February 1, 2015, the beneficial ownership of common stock, class B common stock, and preferred stock of First Data Holdings Inc. by each person known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of the equity securities of First Data Corporation, each director, each Named Executive Officer and all directors and executive officers as a group. We believe that each person has sole voting and investment power of the shares.
Title of class Name 
Number of Shares
Beneficially
 Owned(1)(2)
 
Percent
 of Class
Common Stock    
  
  
New Omaha Holdings L.P.(3)
 1,266,800,220
 98%
  Frank Bisignano 12,078,571
 *
  Michael K. Neborak 500,000
 *
  Ray E. Winborne 1,364,850
 *
  Cynthia A. Armine-Klein 
 *
  Sanjiv Das 
 *
  Joseph J. Plumeri 3,011,905
 *
  Joe W. Forehand 3,299,999
 *
  
Henry R. Kravis(3)(4)
 
 *
  Heidi G. Miller 
 *
  James E. Nevels 
 *
  
Scott C. Nuttall(4)
 
 *
  
Tagar C. Olson(4)
 
 *
  All directors and executive officers as a group (19 persons) 23,738,536
 2%
       
Class B Common Stock      
  
New Omaha Holdings L.P.(3)
 315,055,000
 36%
       
Preferred Stock    
  
  
New Omaha Holdings L.P.(3)
 300,000
 100%
*Less than one percent
(1)The number of shares reported includes shares covered by options that are exercisable and restricted stock that is vested and delivered within 60 days of February 1, 2015 as follows: Mr. Bisignano, 5,507,142; Mr. Forehand, 2,966,666; Mr. Plumeri 333,333; Mr. Winborne, 1,031,517; and all directors and executive officers as a group, 13,171,869.
(2)No shares are pledged as security.
(3)New Omaha Holdings L.P. is a limited partnership in which investment funds associated with Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. and other co-investors own the limited partner interests. New Omaha Holdings LLC is the general partner of New Omaha Holdings L.P. KKR 2006 Fund L.P. is the sole member of New Omaha Holdings LLC. KKR Associates 2006 L.P. is the general partner of KKR 2006 Fund L.P. KKR 2006 GP LLC is the general partner of KKR 2006 Associates L.P. KKR Fund Holdings L.P. is the designated member of KKR 2006 GP LLC. KKR Fund Holdings GP Limited is a general partner of KKR Fund Holdings L.P. KKR Group Holdings L.P. is a general partner of KKR Fund Holdings L.P. and the sole shareholder of KKR Fund Holdings GP Limited. KKR Group Limited is the sole general partner of KKR Group Holdings L.P. KKR & Co. L.P. is the sole shareholder of KKR Group Limited. KKR Management LLC is the sole general partner of KKR & Co. L.P. Henry R. Kravis and George R. Roberts are the designated

131




members of KKR Management LLC. In addition, Messrs. Kravis and Roberts have been designated as managers of KKR 2006 GP LLC by KKR Fund Holdings L.P. In such capacities, each of the aforementioned entities and individuals may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held by New Omaha Holdings L.P. but each such entity and individual disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by New Omaha Holdings L.P. The address of each of the entities listed in this footnote is c/o Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P., 9 West 57th Street, New York, New York 10019.
(4)Each of Messrs. Kravis, Nuttall and Olson is a member of the Company’s board of directors and serves as an executive of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. and/or one or more of its affiliates. Each of Messrs. Kravis, Nuttall and Olson disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares held by New Omaha Holdings L.P.
ITEM 13.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Policies Regarding the Approval of Transactions with Related Parties
Under our Director Code of Conduct, each director must reportThe information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our General Counsel upon learningProxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of any prospective transaction or relationship in which the director will have a financial or personal interest (direct or indirect) that is with us, involves the use of our assets, or involves competition against us (consistent with any confidentiality obligation the director may have). Our General Counsel must then advise our Board of any such transaction or relationship and our Board must pre-approve any material transaction or relationship.
Under our Code of Conduct, executive officers may not use their personal influenceShareholders to get us to do business with a company in which they, their family members or their friends have an interest. In situations where an executive officer is in a position of influence or where a conflict of interest would arise, the prior approval of our General Counsel is required.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
We have a management agreement with Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. (KKR) and one of its affiliates (Management Agreement) pursuant to which KKR provides management, consulting, financial, and other advisory services to us. Pursuant to the Management Agreement, KKR receives an aggregate annual management fee and reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connectionbe filed with the provision of services. The Management Agreement has an initial term expiring onSEC within 120 days after December 31, 2019, provided that the term will be extended annually thereafter unless we provide prior written notice of its desire not to automatically extend the term. The Management Agreement provides that KKR also is entitled to receive a fee equal to a percentage of the gross transaction value in connection with certain subsequent financing, acquisition, disposition and change of control transactions, as well as a termination fee based on the net present value of future payment obligations under the Management Agreement in the event of an initial public offering or under certain other circumstances. The Management Agreement terminates automatically upon the consummation of an initial public offering unless otherwise determined by KKR and may be terminated at any time by mutual consent of us and KKR. The Management Agreement also contains customary exculpation and indemnification provisions in favor of KKR and its affiliates. In 2014, we paid $20 million of management fees to KKR.
On December 16, 2013, we entered into a purchase agreement in which KKR Capital Markets LLC (KCM), an affiliate of KKR, agreed to serve as one of the initial purchasers for offerings of notes and receive a portion of the underwriting commission for each of the offerings. Under the terms of the agreements, we paid underwriting commissions of $7 million to KCM.

On January 22, 2014, we entered into an engagement letter with KCM, pursuant to which KCM agreed to assist in arranging and coordinating our request to extend the maturity and lower the interest rate on certain commitments and loans under its senior secured lending facility. We paid KCM $1 million for such services.

On June 18, 2014, First Data Holdings Inc., our parent company (Holdings), entered into a placement agent agreement with KCM, pursuant to which KCM agreed to assist in arranging and coordinating Holdings placement of shares of its Class B common stock in a private placement. Holdings paid KCM $41 million for such services.

On July 7, 2014, we entered into an engagement letter with KCM and others which was amended and restated on July 17, 2014, pursuant to which KCM agreed to assist in arranging and coordinating our request to amend the terms and lower the interest on portions of the loans under its senior secured lending facility. We paid KCM $2 million for such services.

In 2014, we paid $7 million to KKR Capstone Americas LLC and its subsidiaries for consulting, financial and other advisory services. KKR Capstone Americas LLC is a consulting company that works exclusively with KKR’s portfolio companies.



132




Independence of Directors
We are privately held and none of the members of our Board of Directors are independent under the standards of the New York Stock Exchange except Ms. Miller and Mr. Nevels. Messrs. Bisignano and Mr. Plumeri are not independent as they are employed by us and Messrs. Kravis, Nuttall and Olson are not independent due to their affiliation with KKR. Mr. Forehand is not independent as he was our interim Chief Executive Officer from March 2010 until October 20102017 and is a Senior Advisor of KKR.incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
We retained Ernst & Young LLPThe information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to auditour Proxy Statement for the accounts and the accounts2018 Annual Meeting of our subsidiaries for 2014 and 2013. Ernst & Young LLP has served as the independent registered public accounting firm for us or its predecessor entities since 1980.

Audit Fees and All Other Fees

The following table shows the fees for audit and other services provided by Ernst & Young LLP for 2014 and 2013:
(in millions) 2014 2013
Audit Fees $7.8
 $7.2
Audit-Related Fees 2.8
 2.8
Tax Fees 0.9
 0.8

Audit Fees This category includes fees relatedShareholders to the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements; the review of our quarterly consolidated financial statements; statutory audits required domestically and internationally; comfort letters, consents, and assistance with and review of documentsbe filed with the SEC; offering memoranda, purchase accountingSEC within 120 days after December 31, 2017 and other accounting, and financial reporting consultation and research work billed as audit fees or necessary to comply with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Audit-Related Fees The category consists of fees for audit-related services that are reasonable related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements. Audit-related fees primarily include fees related to service auditor examinations, due diligence related to mergers and acquisitions, attest services that are not requiredis incorporated herein by statute or regulation, and consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards not classified as audit fees.
Tax Fees This category consists of fees for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning services.
All Other Fees This category consists of fees for services that are not included in the above categories. We did not pay Ernst & Young any other fees for services that are not included in the categories above.
Audit Committee Pre-approval of Service of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firmreference.

Our Audit Committee has established a policy to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services, and other services. Pursuant to the policy, our Audit Committee annually reviews and pre-approves services that may be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm for each audit year. The pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is subject to a specific budget. Once pre-approved, the services and pre-approved amounts are monitored against actual charges incurred and modified if appropriate. The Chairperson of the Committee has the authority to pre-approve such services between meetings of our Audit Committee and reports such pre-approvals to our Audit Committee at the next regularly scheduled meeting.
During 2014, all audit and non-audit services provided by Ernst & Young LLP were pre-approved by our Audit Committee of the Board of Directors or, consistent with the pre-approval policy of our Audit Committee, by the Chairperson of our Audit Committee for inter-meeting pre-approvals.

133112





PART IV 
ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
 
(a)The following documents are filed as part of this report:
 
(1)Financial Statements
See Index to Financial Statements on page 48.
Page

(2)Financial Statement Schedules
See Index to Financial Statements on page 48.
Page

(3)                Those exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K and by paragraph (b) below.
 
(b)The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report or, where indicated, were heretofore filed and are hereby incorporated by reference:

Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit Number Exhibit DescriptionForm File Number Exhibit Number Filing Date
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 1, 2007, among New Omaha Holdings L.P., Omaha Acquisition Corporation and First Data Corporation8-K 1-11073 2.1 4/2/2007
3(i) Restated Certificate of Incorporation of First Data Corporation10-Q 1-11073 3(i) 11/14/2007
3(ii) First Data Corporation By-laws10-Q 1-11073 3(ii) 5/13/2011
4.1 Indenture, dated as of March 26, 1993, between First Data Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association, as trusteeS-3 1-11073 4.3 6/3/1994
4.2 2007 Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 22, 2007, between First Data Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee8-K 1-11073 4.1 8/28/2007
4.4 Indenture, dated as of August 20, 2010, among First Data Corporation, the subsidiary guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, governing the 8.875% Senior Secured Notes Due 20208-K 1-11073 10.1 8/26/2010
4.5 Pledge Agreement, dated as of August 20, 2010, among First Data Corporation, the other pledgors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as collateral agent8-K 1-11073 10.2 8/26/2010
4.6 Security Agreement, dated as of August 20, 2010, among First Data Corporation, the other grantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as collateral agent8-K 1-11073 10.3 8/26/2010
4.7 Indenture, dated as of December 17, 2010, among First Data Corporation, the subsidiary guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, governing the 8.25% Senior Second Lien Notes due 2021 and the 8.75/10.00% Senior Second Lien Notes due 20228-K 1-11073 10.1 12/22/2010
Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit Number Exhibit DescriptionForm File Number Exhibit Number Filing Date
 8-K 1-11073 3.1 10/19/2015
          
 8-K 1-11073 3.1 12/27/2016
          
 8-K 1-11073 3.1 12/21/2017
          
3.2 (1)
        
          
 8-K 1-11073 10.2 8/20/2012
          
 8-K 1-11073 10.2 10/2/2012
          
 8-K 1-11073 4.1 8/13/2015
          
 8-K 1-11073 4.1 
11/20/2015

          
          
 10-Q 1-11073 10.8 11/14/2007
          

134113




4.8 Indenture, dated as of December 17, 2010, among First Data Corporation, the subsidiary guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, governing the 12.625% Senior Notes due 20218-K 1-11073 10.2 12/22/2010
4.9 Pledge Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2010, among First Data Corporation, the other pledgors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as collateral agent8-K 1-11073 10.3 12/22/2010
4.10 Security Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2010, among First Data Corporation, the other grantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as collateral agent8-K 1-11073 10.4 12/22/2010
4.11 Indenture, dated as of April 13, 2011, by and among First Data Corporation, the guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, governing the 7.375% Senior Secured Notes due 20198-K 1-11073 10.2 4/13/2011
4.12 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as March 23, 2012, by and among First Data Corporation, the guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, governing the additional 7.375% Senior Secured Notes due 20198-K 1-11073 10.2 3/26/2012
4.13 Indenture, dated as August 16, 2012, by and among First Data Corporation, the guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, governing the 6.750% Senior Secured Notes due 20208-K 1-11073 10.2 8/20/2012
4.14 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as September 27, 2012, by and among First Data Corporation, the guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, governing the additional 6.750% Senior Secured Notes due 20208-K 1-11073 10.2 10/2/2012
4.15 Indenture, dated as of February 13, 2013, by and among First Data Corporation, the guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, governing the 11.25% Senior Notes due 20218-K 1-11073 4.1 2/13/2013
4.16 Indenture, dated as of April 10, 2013, by and among First Data Corporation, the guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, governing the 10.625% Senior Notes due 20218-K 1-11073 4.1 4/16/2013
4.17 Indenture, dated as of May 30, 2013, by and among First Data Corporation, the guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, governing the 11.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 20218-K 1-11073 4.1 5/30/2013
4.18 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as November 19, 2013, by and among First Data Corporation, the guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, governing the additional 11.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 20218-K 1-11073 4.1 11/25/2013
4.19 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as January 6, 2014, by and among First Data Corporation, the guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, governing the additional 11.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 20218-K 1-11073 4.1 1/8/2014

135




4.20 Credit Agreement, dated as of September 24, 2007, as amended and restated as of September 28, 2007 among First Data Corporation, the several lenders from time to time parties thereto, Credit Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent, swingline lender and letter of credit issuer, Citibank, N.A., as syndication agent, and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., Lehman Brothers Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as joint lead arrangers and bookrunners10-K 1-11073 10.1 3/13/2008
4.21 Guarantee Agreement, dated September 24, 2007, among First Data Corporation, the subsidiaries of First Data Corporation identified therein and Credit Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch, as Collateral Agent10-Q 1-11073 10.11 11/14/2007
4.22 Pledge Agreement, dated September 24, 2007, among First Data Corporation, the subsidiaries of First Data Corporation identified therein, and Credit Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch, as Collateral Agent10-Q 1-11073 10.12 11/14/2007
4.23 Security Agreement, dated September 24, 2007, among First Data Corporation, the subsidiaries of First Data Corporation identified therein, and Credit Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch, as Collateral Agent10-Q 1-11073 10.13 11/14/2007
4.24 2012 August Extension Agreement, dated as of August 16, 2012, among First Data Corporation, certain of its subsidiaries, certain of the lenders under the Credit Agreement, and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent, including: Exhibit A - Marked Pages of Credit Agreement8-K 1-11073 10.1 8/20/2012
4.25 September 2012 Joinder Agreement, dated as of September 27, 2012, among First Data Corporation, certain of its subsidiaries, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as initial lender, and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent, including: Exhibit B - Marked Pages of the Conformed Credit Agreement8-K 1-11073 10.1 10/2/2012
4.26 February 2013 Joinder Agreement, dated as of February 13, 2013, among First Data Corporation, certain of its subsidiaries, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as initial lender, and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent, including: Exhibit B - Marked Pages of the Conformed Credit Agreement8-K 1-11073 4.3 2/13/2013
4.27 2013 Second April Repricing Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2013, among First Data Corporation, certain of its subsidiaries, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as initial lender, and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent, including: Exhibit A - Marked Pages of the Conformed Credit Agreement8-K 1-11073 4.4 4/16/2013

136




4.28 2013 April Repricing Amendment, dated as of April 10, 2013, among First Data Corporation, certain of its subsidiaries, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as initial lender, and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent, including: Exhibit A - Marked Pages of the Conformed Credit Agreement8-K 1-11073 4.3 4/16/2013
4.29 2014 January Extension and Repricing Amendment, dated as of January 30, 2014, among First Data Corporation, certain of its subsidiaries, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as initial lender, and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent and collateral agent Exhibit A - Marked Pages of the Conformed Credit Agreement8-K 1-11073 4.1 2/5/2014
4.30 2014 July Repricing Amendment, dated as of July 18, 2014, among First Data Corporation, certain of its subsidiaries, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as initial lender, and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent and collateral agent; Exhibit A - Marked Pages of the Conformed Credit Agreement8-K 1-11073 4.1 7/24/2014
10.1 Management Agreement, dated September 24, 2007, among First Data Corporation, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. and New Omaha Holdings L.P.10-Q 1-11073 10.10 11/14/2007
10.2 * Form of Stock Option Agreement for Executive Committee Members10-Q 1-11073 10.6 11/14/2007
10.3 * Form of Management Stockholder’s Agreement for Executive Committee Members (as amended)10-K 1-11073 10.16 3/19/2013
10.4 Form of Sale Participation Agreement10-Q 1-11073 10.8 11/14/2007
10.5 * 2002 First Data Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended14A 1-11073 C 4/17/2007
10.6 * First Data Corporation Senior Executive Incentive Plan as amended and restated effective January 1, 201410-K 1-11073 10.21 3/10/2014
10.7 * Form of Stock Option Agreement8-K 1-11073 10.3 5/25/2010
10.8 * Form of Stock Option Agreement (effective April 2010)8-K 1-11073 10.4 6/23/2010
10.9 * Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement8-K 1-11073 10.2 5/25/2010
10.10 * (1) 2007 Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees of First Data Corporation and its Affiliates, as amended       
10.11 * (1) First Data Corporation Severance / Change in Control Policy (Management Committee Level), as amended and restated effective January 1, 2015       
10.12 * (1) Description of First Data Holdings Inc. Compensation of Directors       
10.13 * First Data Holdings Inc. 2008 Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation PlanS-4 1-11073 10.25 8/13/2008
10.14 * Employment Agreement with Frank J. Bisignano effective as of April 28, 20138-K 1-11073 10.1 5/2/2013
10.15 * Separation Agreement between Raymond E. Winborne, First Data Corporation and First Data Holdings, Inc.10-Q 1-11073 10.2 8/8/2014

137




10.16 10-Q10-K 1-11073 10.510.16 11/9/20053/19/2013
21 (1) Subsidiaries of First Data Corporation       
31.1 (1) S-11-1107310.187/20/2015
10-K1-1107310.213/10/2014
10-K1-1107310.102/27/2015
10-Q1-1107310.611/14/2007
8-K1-1107310.35/25/2010
S-11-1107310.16
7/20/2015

S-11-1107310.17
7/20/2015

8-K1-1107310.25/25/2010
8-K

1-1107310.1
10/19/2015

S-1/A

1-1107310.2110/1/2015
S-1/A

1-1107310.2210/1/2015
10-K1-1107310.162/25/2016
10-K1-1107310.172/25/2016
10-Q1-1107310.25/8/2017
10-Q1-1107310.111/9/2016
10-Q1-1107310.211/9/2016
10-Q1-1107310.311/9/2016
10-Q1-1107310.15/11/2016
S-1/A1-1107310.2310/1/2015

114




 10-K 1-11073 10.11 2/27/2015
          
 8-K 1-11073 10.1 7/24/2017
          
 S-4 1-11073 10.25 8/13/2008
          
 8-K 1-11073 10.1 
9/24/2015

          
 8-K 1-11073 10.1 1/7/2016
          
 8-K 1-11073 10.1 7/6/2017
          
 8-K 1-11073 10.2 1/7/2016
          
 10-K 1-11073 10.28 2/24/2017
          
 

8-K 1-11073 10.2 7/6/2017
          
21 (1)
        

115




23.1(1)
23.2(1)
31.1(1)
       
31.2 (1) 
31.2(1)
       
32.1 (1) 
32.1(1)
       
32.2 (1) 
32.2(1)
       
101.INS (1)
 XBRL Instance Document       
101.SCH (1)
 XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document       
101.CAL (1)
 XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document       
101.DEF (1)
 XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document       
101.LAB (1)
 XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document       
101.PRE (1)
 XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document       
(1)Filed herewith

 *Management contracts and compensatory plans and arrangements required to be filed as exhibits pursuant to Item 15(b) of this report.

(c)The following financial statements are included in this annual report pursuant to Regulations S-X Rule 3-09:

(1)Wells Fargo Merchant Services, LLC
(A Joint Venture)
Financial Statements
December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015
(With Independent Auditors’ Report Thereon)

 

 


138116





 
WELLS FARGO MERCHANT SERVICES, LLC
(A Joint Venture)
Financial Statements
For the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 20132016
(With Independent Auditors’ Report Thereon)
 

139117





WELLS FARGO MERCHANT SERVICES, LLC
(A Joint Venture)
Financial Statements
December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015


Table of Contents
 
 Page
Independent Auditors’ Report141119
  
Balance SheetsSheet143121
  
StatementsStatement of Revenues and Expenses144122
  
StatementsStatement of Members’ Equity145123
  
StatementsStatement of Cash Flows146124
  
Notes to Financial Statements147125



































140118





KPMG LLP                
Suite 1400
55 Second Street
San Francisco, CA 94105





Independent Auditors’ Report


The Members and Board of Directors of
Wells Fargo Merchant Services, LLC:

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Wells Fargo Merchant Services, LLC (the Company), which comprise the balance sheetssheet as of December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, and the related statements of revenues and expenses, members’ equity, and cash flows for the years thenin the three-year period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes to the financial statements.

Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors’ Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors’ judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.











KPMG LLP is a Delaware limited liability partnership,
the U.S. member firm of KPMG International Cooperative
(“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.

141119







Opinion
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly in all material respects, the financial position of Wells Fargo Merchant Services, LLC as of December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years thenin the three-year period ended December 31, 2017 in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.



San Francisco, California February 19, 201512, 2018


142120





WELLS FARGO MERCHANT SERVICES, LLC
(A Joint Venture)
Balance SheetsSheet
December 31, 20142017 and 20132016
(Dollars in thousands)thousands, unless otherwise noted)

AssetsAssets 2014 2013 2017 2016
Cash and cash equivalentsCash and cash equivalents$64,403
 64,077
$41,455
 $35,527
Settlement assetsSettlement assets 1,045,533
 872,857
 3,638,373
 2,416,073
Accounts receivable, net of reserve for merchant credit losses ofAccounts receivable, net of reserve for merchant credit losses of 316,446
 271,931
 569,143
 490,666
$4.5M in 2014 and $3.4M 2013    
$5.4 million in 2017 and $5.4 million 2016    
IntangiblesIntangibles 479
 437
 751
 797
Other assetsOther assets 12
 12
 614
 1,038
Total assetsTotal assets$1,426,873
 1,209,314
$4,250,336
 $2,944,101
Liabilities and Members’ EquityLiabilities and Members’ Equity        
Settlement liabilitiesSettlement liabilities$977,144
 813,233
$3,576,837
 $2,328,205
Accounts payable and accrued expensesAccounts payable and accrued expenses 30,465
 25,374
 71,376
 62,391
Advances payable to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 280,982
 233,167
Interchange payable to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 478,819
 414,122
Related party payable to First Data Merchant Services CorporationRelated party payable to First Data Merchant Services Corporation 13,664
 22,511
 7,973
 8,295
Distribution payable to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Distribution payable to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 72,016
 66,263
 66,444
 75,898
Distribution payable to First Data Merchant Services CorporationDistribution payable to First Data Merchant Services Corporation 48,011
 44,175
 44,296
 50,599
Total liabilitiesTotal liabilities 1,422,282
 1,204,723
 4,245,745
 2,939,510
Members’ equityMembers’ equity 4,591
 4,591
 4,591
 4,591
Total liabilities and members’ equityTotal liabilities and members’ equity$1,426,873
 1,209,314
$4,250,336
 $2,944,101

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

143121





WELLS FARGO MERCHANT SERVICES, LLC
(A Joint Venture)
StatementsStatement of Revenues and Expenses
December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015
(Dollars in thousands)thousands, unless otherwise noted)

 2014 2013 2017 2016 2015
Revenues:          
Card services revenue, net of $3.5B and $2.9B in interchange$704,972
 663,181
and assessments in 2014 and 2013, respectively    
Card services revenue, net of $6.8 billion, $5.5 billion and $4.3 billion in interchange and assessments in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively$731,843
 $786,803
 $762,608
Product sales revenue 54,593
 50,392
 29,032
 50,359
 70,635
Other revenue 53,612
 40,419
 84,951
 69,030
 60,777
Net revenue 813,177
 753,992
 845,826
 906,192
 894,020
Expenses:          
Cost of card services 186,955
 175,502
 249,362
 222,790
 202,769
Cost of product sold 16,141
 14,729
 12,016
 15,536
 21,464
Selling, general and administrative 132,520
 126,905
 135,964
 135,546
 145,197
Other expenses 8,734
 8,308
 11,819
 9,721
 11,160
Total expenses 344,350
 325,444
 409,161
 383,593
 380,590
Net operating income 468,827
 428,548
 436,665
 522,599
 513,430
Interest income 1,338
 1,217
 1,528
 788
 695
Net income$470,165
 429,765
$438,193
 $523,387
 $514,125

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

144122





WELLS FARGO MERCHANT SERVICES, LLC
(A Joint Venture)
StatementsStatement of Members' Equity
December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015
(Dollars in thousands)thousands, unless otherwise noted)

 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. First Data Merchant Services Corporation Total Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. First Data Merchant Services Corporation Total
Members’ equity at December 31, 2012$2,755
 1,836
 4,591
Members’ equity at December 31, 2014$2,755
 $1,836
 $4,591
Net income 257,859
 171,906
 429,765
 308,475
 205,650
 514,125
Distributions to members (257,859) (171,906) (429,765) (308,475) (205,650) (514,125)
Members’ equity at December 31, 2013 2,755
 1,836
 4,591
Members’ equity at December 31, 2015 2,755
 1,836
 4,591
Net income 282,099
 188,066
 470,165
 314,032
 209,355
 523,387
Distributions to members (282,099) (188,066) (470,165) (314,032) (209,355) (523,387)
Members’ equity at December 31, 2014$2,755
 1,836
 4,591
Members’ equity at December 31, 2016 2,755
 1,836
 4,591
Net income 262,916
 175,277
 438,193
Distributions to members (262,916) (175,277) (438,193)
Members’ equity at December 31, 2017$2,755
 $1,836
 $4,591

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

145123





WELLS FARGO MERCHANT SERVICES, LLC
(A Joint Venture)
StatementsStatement of Cash Flows
December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015
(Dollars in thousands)thousands, unless otherwise noted)
 2014 2013 2017 2016 2015
Cash flows from operating activities:          
Net income$470,165
 429,765
$438,193
 $523,387
 $514,125
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided          
by operating activities:          
Amortization of intangibles 298
 818
 398
 322
 318
Provisions for merchant credit losses 10,375
 6,920
Provisions for credit losses 12,361
 12,220
 13,108
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:          
Settlement assets (172,676) (229,334) (1,222,299) (1,158,042) (212,497)
Accounts receivable, net of reserve for merchant credit losses (54,891) (40,146) (90,838) (102,059) (97,490)
Other assets 424
 (895) (132)
Settlement liabilities 163,911
 216,078
 1,248,632
 1,156,390
 194,672
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 5,091
 (1,498) 8,985
 18,439
 13,487
Advances payable to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 47,815
 41,061
Related party payable to First Data Merchant Services Corporation (8,847) 7,733
Other assets 
 110
Interchange Payable to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 64,697
 73,685
 59,455
Related Party Payable to First Data Merchant Services Corporation (322) (14,905) 9,536
Net cash provided by operating activities 461,241
 431,507
 460,231
 508,542
 494,582
Cash flows from investing activities:          
Contract acquisition costs (339) (326)
Purchase of capitalized software 
 (60)
Signing bonus on executed contract (352) (662) (296)
Net cash used in investing activities (339) (386) (352) (662) (296)
Cash flows from financing activities:          
Distributions to members (460,576) (420,279) (453,951) (524,442) (506,600)
Net cash used in financing activities (460,576) (420,279) (453,951) (524,442) (506,600)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents 326
 10,842
Increase/(Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 5,928
 (16,562) (12,314)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 64,077
 53,235
 35,527
 52,089
 64,403
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$64,403
 64,077
$41,455
 $35,527
 $52,089

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

146124





WELLS FARGO MERCHANT SERVICES, LLC
(A Joint Venture)
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 2013

2015
(Dollars in thousands, unless otherwise noted)


(1)Business Description
Wells Fargo Merchant Services, LLC (the “Company”)Company) is a joint venture between First Data Merchant Services Corporation (“FDMS”)(FDMS) and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”)(Wells Fargo). FDMS is a wholly-ownedfully owned subsidiary of First Data Corporation (“FDC”), which is owned by an entity controlled by an affiliate of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (“KKR”).Corporation. The Company was established pursuant to the terms of an alliance agreement (the “Membership Agreement”)Membership Agreement) dated November 1, 1993, as amended and a Limited Liability Company Agreement dated September 1, 1997, as amended. The Membership Agreement will terminate on December 31, 2019. FDMS and Wells Fargo are here-in-after referred to, individually, as a “Member”Member or, collectively, as “Members”.

Members.
The Company is engaged in processing and funds transfer services related to the authorization, processing, and settlement of credit and debit card transactions for merchants. A majority of its revenue is based on the dollar amount of transactions processed. The Company primarily provides services to merchant customers within all 50 states, with a significant concentration in California. The Company is operationally dependent on both FDMS and Wells Fargo. The Company’s primary operations are conducted through FDMS. The Company’s funding and settlement are primarily conducted through Wells Fargo. The majority of the bank accounts used for daily operations are with Wells Fargo.

(2)Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a)Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosuredisclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from the estimates. Significant itemsItems subject to such estimates and assumptions include the reserve for merchant credit and fee losses.

(b)Settlement Assets and Liabilities
1) The Company has a fiduciary responsibility to its merchant customers as it relates to the transfer of funds from a cardholder’s issuing bank, via the VISA, MasterCard, American Express or Discover card associationscompanies (the “Card Associations”)Card Networks) and the Accel, AFFN, Alaska Option, Credit Union 24,ATH, CULIANCE, Interlink, Jeanie, Maestro, NYCE, Pulse, TYME,NETS, Shazam, Star, Cash Station, Honor and MACStar Debit Networks (the “Debit Networks”)Debit Networks). The Company records such amounts due from the issuing banks, Card AssociationsNetworks and Debit Networks within the balance sheet caption settlement assets while the related liability, settlement liabilities, represents amounts due to merchants. Pursuant to the Card Associations’Networks’ and Debit Networks’ rules, such fiduciary funds are not available to support the operations of the Company.

147




WELLS FARGO MERCHANT SERVICES, LLC
(A Joint Venture)
Financial Statements
December 31, 2014 and 2013

(Dollars in thousands, unless otherwise noted)


(c)Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the majority of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents were held in Wells Fargo accounts and are FDIC insured.

(d)Merchant Collateral and Reserve for Merchant Credit and Fee Losses
2) When a cardholder or a credit issuing institution disputes a transaction, within the Card AssociationNetwork guidelines, the Company’s merchant customers have a liability for the disputed charges. However, in the case of merchant fraud, insolvency or bankruptcy, the Company may also be liable. Fee receivables that are ultimately deemed as uncollectable are charged-off against the merchant credit and fee loss reserve.

The Company’s determination of the level of the reserve is calculated based on the level of sales volumes multiplied by loss factors taking into consideration charge-offs, recoveries and merchant collateral and rests upon various judgments and assumptions, including the review of historical data and a specific analysis of receivables due from merchants. Our charge-off policy is to fully charge down the balance when the receivable is 60 days past due. The Company requires cash deposits, guarantees, letters of credit or other types of collateral by certain merchants to minimize its credit risk. Included in the balance sheet’s settlement assets is $53,671$78 million and $26,555$124.1 million in Merchant collateral, as of December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively. Merchant collateral represents restricted cash held by the Company in a Wells Fargo bank account. The reserve for merchant credit losses is a valuation allowance for probable losses inherent as of the balance sheet date. The Company considers the reserve for merchant credit losses adequate to cover losses inherent in the portfolio as of December 31, 20142017 and 2013.2016.

125




WELLS FARGO MERCHANT SERVICES, LLC
(A Joint Venture)
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, unless otherwise noted)


(e)(c)Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the majority of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents were held in Wells Fargo accounts and are FDIC insured.

(d)Intangibles
The Company capitalizes initial payments for new contracts, contract renewals and conversion costs associated with customer processing relationships to the extent recoverable through future operations, contractual minimums and/or penalties in the case of early termination. The Company’s accounting policy is to limit the amount of capitalized costs for a given contract to the lesser of the estimated ongoing future cash flows from the contract or the termination fees the Company would receive in the event of early termination of the contract by the customer. The company amortizes intangibles over the period of the contract.

(f)(e)Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
The Company accrues for certain expenses that have been received and that are billed one month in arrears.incurred. These estimates are classified within accounts payable and accrued expenses in the balance sheet.




148126





WELLS FARGO MERCHANT SERVICES, LLC
(A Joint Venture)
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 2013

2015
(Dollars in thousands, unless otherwise noted)


(g)(f)Income Taxes
No provision is made in the accounts of the Company for federal or state income taxes because all items of income and expense and other items affecting taxable income are allocated to the Members for inclusion in their income tax returns.

In accounting for income taxes, the Company follows the guidance in FASB ASC 740 (formerly FASB Interpretation No. 48), as amended by ASU 2009-06, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. ASC 740 requires the Company to determine whether a tax position of the Company is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority, including resolution of any related appeals or ligation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefit to be recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement which could result in the Company recording a tax liability that would reduce net assets. ASC 740 also provides guidance on thresholds, measurement, de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition that is intended to provide better financial statement comparability among different entities. As an LLC and pass-through entity, the Company does not incur tax expense and is not required to record a tax provision related to uncertain tax positions, in accordance with the recognition, measurement, classification, and disclosure requirements of ASC 740-10. The U.S. is the major tax jurisdiction for the Company. The tax returns of the Company can be examined by the relevant taxing authorities until the applicable statute of limitations has expired, which is generally three to four years from the date the return is initially filed, depending on the specific jurisdiction. Based on analysis by the Company, there were no material positions identified which did not meet the “more"more likely than not”not" standard as of and for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013.2016.


(h)(g)Members’ Equity
An equity account is maintained for each Member. In certain instances, the Members may be required to make additional contributions to the Company. Such contributions will be determined on a pro-rata basis in accordance with each Member’s Membership Interestmembership interest at the time of the request and will be added to the Member’s equity account. Membership Interestinterest is defined as the ownership percentage of the Company by each member.


149127





WELLS FARGO MERCHANT SERVICES, LLC
(A Joint Venture)
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 2013

2015
(Dollars in thousands, unless otherwise noted)


(i)(h)Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes card services revenues from its transaction processing and authorization services as such services are performed. The revenues from transaction processing and authorization services are included in card services revenue in the statement of revenue and expenses. The Company recognizes revenue when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service is performed and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Certain revenues are recorded net of certain costs not controlled by the Company, including interchange and assessment fees charged by the Card Associations. Such costsNetworks. These revenues totaled $3.5$7.1 billion, $6 billion and $2.9$4.7 billion for the years ended December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 2013. The Company recognizes product revenue from merchant referred leases, rentals2015 and sales as such services are performed inassociated costs totaled $6.8 billion, $5.5 billion and $4.3 billion for the form of a feeyears ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and a corresponding charge from affiliates of FDMS.

2015.
Debit revenues are recorded gross and are included within card services revenue in the statement of revenues and expenses. Debit Networknetwork fees are recorded within cost of card services in the statement of revenues and expenses. Debit revenues are recognized as such services are performed. Debit Networknetwork fees totaled $101.6$121.9 million, $110.1 million and $96.4$105.2 million for the years ended December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 2013.2015 and associated revenues totaled $153.8 million, $139.5 million and $126.9 million for the years ended December 2017, 2016 and 2015.

The Company recognizes product revenue from merchant referred leases, rentals and sales as such services are performed. These revenues totaled $29 million, $50.4 million and $70.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 and are classified within Product Revenue. The Company records expense associated with the corresponding charge from affiliates of FDMS. These expenses totaled $12 million, $15.5 million and $21.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 and are classified within Cost of product sold.
In addition to the above, the Company recognizes other fees for services as such services are performed. The other revenue caption on the statement of revenues and expenses includes relevant items such as monthly fees, new account fees, income from cash advances, chargeback fees, supply fees and early termination fees.


(j)(i)Comprehensive Income
For the year ended December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015 net income equals comprehensive income.

(j) New Accounting Pronouncements

Revenue Recognition
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance that requires companies to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in amounts that reflect the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in an exchange for those goods or services. It also requires enhanced disclosures about revenue, provides guidance for transactions that were not previously addressed comprehensively, and improves guidance for multiple-element arrangements. The FASB has subsequently issued several amendments to the standard, including clarification on accounting for licenses, identifying performance obligations, and principal versus agent consideration (reporting revenue gross vs. net).  The Company has not yet determined the effect of the new standard on its current policies for revenue recognition, its presentation of revenue in the financial statements or additional disclosures as it is not required to implement the new standard until January 1, 2019.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued guidance which requires lessees to put most leases on their balance sheets. The guidance also modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases for lessors and provides new presentation and disclosure requirements for both lessees and lessors. The standard is effective for financial statements issued by public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15,

150128




2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period subsequent to adoption of the preceding revenue recognition guidance. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of the new guidance on its financial statements.
Credit Losses
In June 2016, the FASB issued guidance that will change the accounting for credit impairment. Under the new guidance, companies are required to measure all expected credit losses for financial instruments held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable supportable forecasts. This replaces the existing incurred loss model and is applicable to the measurement of credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost and applies to some off-balance sheet credit exposures. This new guidance will be effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018.
Statement of Cash Flows
In November 2016, the FASB issued guidance that will change the presentation of restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents on the statement of cash flows. Under the new guidance, companies will be required to include restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents with the cash and cash equivalents line item when reconciling beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. Given this change, transfers between cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash and cash equivalents will not be reported as cash flow activities on the statement of cash flows. In addition, the guidance requires entities to disclose information about the nature of restrictions on its cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash and cash equivalents. The new guidance will be effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its financial statements.


129




WELLS FARGO MERCHANT SERVICES, LLC
(A Joint Venture)
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 2013

2015
(Dollars in thousands, unless otherwise noted)


(3)Intangibles
Following is a summary of the Company’s intangibles for the years ended December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 2013:2015:
 Intangible Assets, Gross of Accumulated AmortizationAccumulated Amortization
Intangible Assets, Net of
Accumulated Amortization
 Intangible Assets, Gross of Accumulated Amortization Accumulated Amortization 
Intangible Assets, Net of
Accumulated Amortization
Beginning balance as of January 1, 2014$2,370(1,933)437
Beginning balance as of January 1, 2017$2,544 $(1,747) $797
Additions 340340 352  352
Retirements (401)401   
Amortization (298)  (398) (398)
Ending balance as of December 31, 2014$2,309(1,830)479
Ending balance as of December 31, 2017$2,896 $(2,145) $751
  
Beginning balance as of January 1, 2013$10,940(10,071)869
Beginning balance as of January 1, 2016$2,266 $(1,809) $457
Additions 386386 662  662
Retirements (8,956)8,956 (384) 384 
Amortization (818)  (322) (322)
Ending balance as of December 31, 2013$2,370(1,933)437
Ending balance as of December 31, 2016$2,544 $(1,747) $797
 
Beginning balance as of January 1, 2015$2,309 $(1,830) $479
Additions 296  296
Retirements (339) 339 
Amortization  (318) (318)
Ending balance as of December 31, 2015$2,266 $(1,809) $457

For the years ended December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, amortization expense of $298$398, $322, and $818,$318, respectively, is included in other expenses in the statement of revenues and expenses.

(4)Related Party Transactions
The Company’s primary operations are conducted through FDMS. FDMS charges the Company fees for services provided pursuant to an operating agreement (the “Operating Agreement”)Operating Agreement) dated January 31, 2000, as amended and restated. The Members also agreed to perform certain additional management functions (the “Additional Services”)Additional Services) of the Company, for which they will be reimbursed by the Company. These fees are included in cost of card services, cost of product sold (including expenses associated with merchant referred leases, rentals and sales from affiliates of FDMS) and selling, general and administrative expenses within the statement of revenue and expense.expense for both Members. The financial statements may not necessarily be indicative of the financial position that would have existed, or the results of operations or cash flows that would have occurred had the Company operated as an independent enterprise. During the years ended December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, the Company reimbursed FDMS and Wells Fargo for performing the Additional Services as follows:


151130





WELLS FARGO MERCHANT SERVICES, LLC
(A Joint Venture)
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 2013

2015
(Dollars in thousands, unless otherwise noted)


 2014 2017
 First Data Merchant Services, Corporation 
Wells Fargo
Bank, NA
 First Data Merchant Services, Corporation 
Wells Fargo
Bank, NA
Cost of card services$66,980 $107,971 $
Cost of product sold 16,141  12,016 
Selling, general and administrative 12,206 120,314 7,997 127,967
Total$95,327 120,314$127,984 $127,967
  
 2013 2016
$First Data Merchant Services, Corporation 
Wells Fargo
Bank, NA
 First Data Merchant Services, Corporation 
Wells Fargo
Bank, NA
Cost of card services 63,276 $92,161 $
Cost of product sold 14,729  15,536 
Selling, general and administrative 11,795 115,110 11,766 123,780
Total$89,800 115,110$119,463 $123,780
 
 2015
 First Data Merchant Services, Corporation  
Wells Fargo
Bank, NA
Cost of card services$76,686 $
Cost of product sold 21,464 
Selling, general and administrative 14,324 130,873
Total$112,474 $130,873

Included in the balance sheets at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016 is a advances payable to FDMS of $13,644$7,973 and $22,511,$8,295, respectively. These balances primarily consist of selling, general and administrative costs, cost of card services, and cost of product sold owed to FDMS which are partially offset by feesnet revenue owed to WFMS for the contributed portfolio.

These balances are settled monthly, one month in arrears.
Included in the balance sheets at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016 is an advancesa payable to Wells Fargo of
$280,982 $478,819 and $233,167,$414,122, respectively, which is primarily attributable to non-interest bearing advances, made by Wells Fargo to the Company.Company, to fund interchange settlements with Card Networks. These payable amounts are settled monthly.monthly, one month in arrears.


(5)Allocation and Distribution of Income to Members
Profits and losses of the Company are allocated in accordance with each Member’s Interest. Distributions of allocated income to the Members are made on a quarterly basis, subject to consent of the Members. Income distributed shall equal 100% of the distributable funds, as defined in the Membership Agreement, unless a smaller percentage is agreed to by the Members.


152131





WELLS FARGO MERCHANT SERVICES, LLC
(A Joint Venture)
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 2013

2015
(Dollars in thousands, unless otherwise noted)


(6)Termination of Company
The Company can be terminated in the event of certain termination events, set forth in the Membership Agreement with an effective date of January 1, 2014. These include merger or acquisition of either of the Members, and various other performance criteria. If the Company is terminated prior to December 31, 2019, based on who initiates the termination, an early termination fee may apply in accordance with the provisions and criteria of the agreement.

(7)Limited Liability of Members
The membersMembers of a Delaware limited liability company are generally not liable for the acts and omissions of the Company, much in the same manner as the shareholders, officers and directors of a corporation are generally not liable for the acts and omissions of the corporation. Such liability is generally limited by the provisions of the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act and by applicable case law.

(8)Fair Value of Financial Instruments
FASB ASC 825, Financial Instruments,, requires the disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments, including assets and liabilities recognized in the balance sheets. Management estimates that the aggregate fair value of financial instruments recognized in the balance sheets (including receivables, payables and payables)merchant collateral) approximates their carrying value; as such financial instruments are short-term in nature or carry floating rates of interest.

(9)Guarantees and Reserve for Merchant Credit Losses
Under the card companies’ rules, when a merchant processor acquires card transactions, it has certain liabilities for the transactions. This liability arises from disputes between cardholders and merchants due to the cardholders’ dissatisfaction with merchandise quality or the merchants’ service, which are not resolved with the merchant. In such cases, the transactions are “charged back”charged back to the respective merchants and the related purchase amounts are refunded to the cardholders by the card issuer. If the merchant does not fund the refund due to insolvency, bankruptcy or other extraneous reasons, the Company, in certain circumstances is liable for the full amount of the transaction. This liability is considered a guarantee under FASB ASC 460, Guarantees.

Guarantees.
The Company’s legal obligation under these rules is to settle any individual chargeback for which an individual merchant fails to fulfill as noted above. Contractually, the maximum exposure for this obligation is the total amount of transactions processed for the preceding four month period for all merchants, which in the case of the Company is in the billions of dollars. It should be noted that the Company has not experienced material chargeback loss activity as a result of merchant processing activities and advises that caution should be used when assessing the maximum exposure described above. The Company records a provision for this estimated obligation based upon a number of factors which include historical losses, credit risk of specific customers and other relevant factors. As shown below, for the years ended December 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, the Company incurred aggregate merchant credit losses of $9,229$12,367, $11,982 and $6,897,$12,430, net of

153




WELLS FARGO MERCHANT SERVICES, LLC
(A Joint Venture)
Financial Statements
December 31, 2014 and 2013

(Dollars in thousands, unless otherwise noted)


recoveries, on total processed volumes. The Company calculates its provision and evaluates the appropriateness of its reserves on a monthly basis.



132




WELLS FARGO MERCHANT SERVICES, LLC
(A Joint Venture)
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands, unless otherwise noted)

The following is the activity related to the reserve for merchant credit losses for the years ended December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 2013:

2015:

Beginning balance as of January 1, 2014$3,361
Provisions for credit loss 10,375
Charge-offs, net of recoveries of $387 (9,229)
Ending balance as of December 31, 2014$4,507
   
Beginning balance as of January 1, 2013$3,338
Provisions for credit loss 6,920
Charge-offs, net of recoveries of $334 (6,897)
Ending balance as of December 31, 2013$3,361

Beginning balance as of January 1, 2017$5,423
Provisions for credit loss 12,361
Charge-offs, net of recoveries of $840 (12,367)
Ending balance as of December 31, 2017$5,417
   
Beginning balance as of January 1, 2016$5,185
Provisions for credit loss 12,220
Charge-offs, net of recoveries of $797 (11,982)
Ending balance as of December 31, 2016$5,423
   
Beginning balance as of January 1, 2015$4,507
Provisions for credit loss 13,108
Charge-offs, net of recoveries of $696 (12,430)
Ending balance as of December 31, 2015$5,185


(10)Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is involved in various legal proceedings. Accruals have been made with respect to these matters, where appropriate, which are reflected in the Company’s financial statements. The Company may enter into discussions regarding settlement of these matters and may enter into settlement agreements, if it believes settlement is in the best interest of the Company. The matters discussed below, if decided adversely to or settled by the Company, individually or in the aggregate, may result in liability material to the Company’s financial condition and/or results of operations. There are asserted claims against the Company where an unfavorable outcome is considered to be reasonably possible. These claims can generally be categorized as matters related to our merchant business.
The Company’s estimates of the possible ranges of losses in excess of any amounts accrued are $0 to $17 million for merchant and other matters.  The estimated range of reasonably possible losses was based on information currently available and involves elements of judgment and significant uncertainties. As additional information becomes available and the resolution of the uncertainties becomes more apparent, it is possible that actual losses may exceed the high end of the estimated range.

(11)Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated the subsequent events from the balance sheet date through February 19, 2015,12, 2018, the date at which the financial statements were available to be issued, and determined that there are no other items to disclose.




154133





Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 FIRST DATA CORPORATION
 (Registrant)
   
 By:/S/   FRANK BISIGNANO
  Frank Bisignano
  Chief Executive Officer
   
 Date:February 27, 201520, 2018
 

134







Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
 
Name Title Date
     
/S/   FRANK BISIGNANO Chief Executive Officer and Director February 27, 201520, 2018
Frank Bisignano   (principal executive officer)  
     
/S/ MICHAEL K. NEBORAKHIMANSHU A. PATEL Executive Vice President, Director of FinanceChief Financial Officer February 27, 201520, 2018
Michael K. NeborakHimanshu A. Patel   (principal financial officer)  
     
/S/ MATTHEW CAGWIN Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer February 27, 201520, 2018
Matthew Cagwin (principal accounting officer)  
     
/S/   JOE W. FOREHANDHENRIQUE DE CASTRO Director February 27, 201520, 2018
Joe W. ForehandHenrique De Castro    
     
/S/   HENRY R. KRAVIS Director February 27, 201520, 2018
Henry R. Kravis    
     
/S/   HEIDI G. MILLER Director February 27, 201520, 2018
Heidi G. Miller    
     
/S/   JAMES E. NEVELS Director February 27, 201520, 2018
James E. Nevels    
     
/S/   SCOTT C. NUTTALL Director February 27, 201520, 2018
Scott C. Nuttall    
     
/S/   TAGAR C. OLSON Director February 27, 201520, 2018
Tagar C. Olson    
     
/S/   JOSEPH J. PLUMERI Director February 27, 201520, 2018
Joseph J. Plumeri    
/S/   BARBARA A. YASTINEDirectorFebruary 20, 2018
Barbara A. Yastine

155135