SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
___________________________ 

FORM 10-K
 
ANNUAL REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
(Mark One)
XANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162017
OR
 
 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from _______ to _______
 
Commission file number   0-17196
 
MGP Ingredients, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
 
Kansas45-4082531
(State or Other Jurisdiction(I.R.S. Employer
of Incorporation or Organization)Identification No.)
  
100 Commercial Street, Box 130, Atchison, Kansas66002
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)
 
(913) 367-1480
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
Title of Each ClassName of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, no par valueNASDAQ Global Select Market
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None





Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ___X_ No X__
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes __ No XX_
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant:  (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes    X      No ____
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes   X       No        
 
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to their Form 10-K.  [ ]
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See definition of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer", and "smaller reporting company": in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One):

[  ] Large accelerated filer                                                         ___[X] Accelerated filer
X[  ]  Non-accelerated filer ___(Do not check if smaller reporting company   [ ] Smaller reportingReporting Company
[ ] Emerging growth company  ___

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ]
 
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes   ___ No   XX_
 
The aggregate market value of common equity held by non-affiliates, computed by reference to the last sales price as reported by NASDAQ on June 30, 2016,2017, was $487,505,243.$656,675,622.
 
The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock, no par value ("Common Stock") outstanding as of March 3, 2017February 23, 2018 was 16,708,742.16,798,353.
 
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
 
The following documents are incorporated herein by reference:
 
(1)Portions of the MGP Ingredients, Inc. Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 1, 2017May 23, 2018 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report to the extent set forth herein.




        


CONTENTS PAGE
 
  
 Business
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
Selected Financial Data and Supplementary Financial Information
 
 
 
  
  
  Consolidated Statements of Income - Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 20142015
  Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income - Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 20142015
  Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 20162017 and 20152016
  
  
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Item 16.Form 10-K Summary
 

The calculation of the aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates is based on the assumption that affiliates include directors and executive officers. Such assumption does not constitute an admission by the Company or any director or executive officer that any director or executive officer is an affiliate of the Company.


i

        


PART I
 
ITEM 1.  BUSINESS

MGP Ingredients, Inc. was incorporated in 2011 in Kansas, continuing a business originally founded by Cloud L. Cray, Sr. in Atchison, Kansas in 1941. The Company’s ticker symbol is MGPI. As used herein, the term "MGP," "Company," "we," "our," or "us" refers to MGP Ingredients, Inc. and its subsidiaries unless the context indicates otherwise. In this document, for any references to Note 1 through Note 1817 refer to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

We make available through our website (www.mgpingredients.com) under "Investors - Investor Relations,"For Investors," free of charge, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, special reports and other information, and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such material with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

METHOD OF PRESENTATION
 
All amounts in this report, except for shares, par values, bushels, gallons, pounds, mmbtu, proof gallons, per share, per bushel, per gallon, per proof gallon, and percentage amounts are shown in thousands, unless otherwise noted.

GENERAL INFORMATION

MGP is a leading producer and supplier of premium distilled spirits and specialty wheat protein and starch food ingredients. Distilled spirits include premium bourbon and rye whiskeys and grain neutral spirits ("GNS"), including vodka and gin. MGP is also a top producer of high quality industrial alcohol for use in both food and non-food applications. Our protein and starch food ingredients provide a host of functional, nutritional, and sensory benefits for a wide range of food products to serve the packaged goods industry. Our distillery products are derived from corn and other grains, (including rye, barley, wheat, barley malt, and milo), and our ingredient products are derived from wheat flour.  The majority of our distillery and ingredient product sales are made directly, or through distributors, to manufacturers and processors of finished packaged goods or to bakeries.

We are headquartered in Atchison, Kansas, where distilled alcohol products and food ingredients are produced at our production facility ("Atchison facility"). Premium spirits are also distilled and matured at our facility in Lawrenceburg and Greendale, Indiana ("Lawrenceburg facility").
 
INFORMATION ABOUT SEGMENTS
 
As of December 31, 2016,2017, we had two reportable segments: distillery products and ingredient solutions. Additional information about our reportable segments can be found in Management’s Discussion & Analysis ("MD&A") and Note 11. Note 11 provides detail of our foreign and domestic net sales revenue and identifiable assets.

Distillery Products Segment - We process corn and other grains (including rye, barley, wheat, barley malt, and milo) into food grade alcohol and distillery co-products, such as distillers feed (commonly called dried distillers grain in the industry), fuel grade alcohol, and corn oil. We also provide warehouse services, including barrel put away, barrel storage, and barrel retrieval services. We have certain contracts with customers to supply distilled products (or "distillate"), as well as certain contracts with customers to provide barreling and warehousing services.  Contracts with customers may be monthly, annual, and multi-year with periodic review of pricing.  Sales of fuel grade alcohol are made on the spot market.  Since 2015, our distillery products segment includes some production and sales of our own branded alcohol products.products under the George Remus®,, TILL American Wheat Vodka®, and Tanner's Creek® Blended Bourbon Whiskey brands. During 2016,2017, our five largest distillery products customers, combined, accounted for about 2323.5 percent of our consolidated net sales.



Food Grade Alcohol - The majority of our distillery capacities are dedicated to the production of high quality, high purity food grade alcohol for beverage and industrial applications.

Food grade alcohol sold for beverage applications, ("premium beverage alcohol")alcohol, consists primarily of premium bourbon and rye whiskeys and grain neutral spirits,GNS, including vodka and gin.  Our premium bourbon is created by distilling grains, primarily corn.  Our whiskey is made from fermented grain mash, including rye and corn. Our whiskeys are primarily sold as unaged new distillate, which are then aged by our customers from two to four years and are sold at various proof concentrations. Grain neutral spirits areOur GNS is sold in bulk quantities at various proof concentrations. Our gin is created by redistilling grain neutral spiritsGNS together with proprietary formulations of botanicals or botanical oils.



In November 2016, we acquired the George Remus® brand from Queen City Whiskey LLC. The prior owner used sourced whiskey from us to launch and successfully build the brand in a small geography. The George Remus® brand portfolio currently consists of three expressions: George Remus® Bourbon Whiskey, George Remus® Rye Whiskey, and George Remus® Limited Edition Rye Whiskey. At the time of the acquisition, distribution was limited to the states of Ohio, Kentucky and Indiana.

In March 2016, we introduced a vodka brand, Till American Wheat Vodka®, distilled using the finest Kansas wheat with initial distribution in the states of Kansas and Missouri. In October 2016, we announced that distribution was expanded to the states of Iowa and Indiana.

In July 2015, we announced our first branded alcohol product, Metze's Select, which was made available for retail sale in September 2015. Metze's Select was a limited edition Indiana Straight Bourbon Whiskey. 

Food grade industrial alcohol is used as an ingredient in foods (e.g., vinegar and food flavorings), personal care products (e.g., hair sprays and hand sanitizers), cleaning solutions, pharmaceuticals, and a variety of other products.  We sell food grade industrial alcohol in tank truck or rail car quantities direct to a number of industrial processors.

Distillers Feed and related Co-ProductsFuel grade alcohol - The bulk alcohol co-products sales include distillers feed, fuel grade alcohol, and corn oil. Distillers feed is principally derived from the mash from alcohol processing operations.  The mash is dried and sold primarily to processors of animal feeds as a high protein additive.  We produce fuel grade alcohol as a co-product of our food grade alcohol business at our distillery in Atchison. We produce corn oil as a value added co-product through a corn oil extraction process.
Fuel grade alcohol is sold primarily for blending with gasoline to increase the octane and oxygen levels of the gasoline.  As an octane enhancer, fuel grade alcohol can serve as a substitute for lead and petroleum-based octane enhancers.  As an oxygenate, fuel grade alcohol has been used in gasoline to meet certain environmental regulations and laws relating to air quality by reducing carbon monoxide, hydrocarbon particulates, and other toxic emissions generated from the burning of gasoline.
Distillers Feed and related Co-Products - The bulk alcohol co-products sales include distillers feed, fuel grade alcohol, and corn oil. Distillers feed is principally derived from the mash from alcohol processing operations.  The mash is dried and sold primarily to processors of animal feeds as a high protein additive.  We produce fuel grade alcohol as a co-product of our food grade alcohol business at our Atchison facility. We produce corn oil as a value added co-product through a corn oil extraction process.
 
Warehouse Services - Customers who purchase unaged barreled whiskey distillate may, and in most cases do, also enter into separate warehouse service agreements with us for the storage of product for aging that include services for barrel put away, barrel storage, and barrel retrieval. Revenue from warehousing services is recognized upon providing the service and/or over the passage of time, as in the case of storage fees.

Ingredient Solutions Segment - Our ingredient solutions segment consists primarily of specialty wheat starches, specialty wheat proteins, commodity wheat starchstarches, and commodity wheat proteins. Contracts with ingredients customers are generally price, volume, and term agreements, which are fixed for three or six month periods, with very few agreements of 12 months duration or more.longer.  During 2016,2017, our five largest ingredient solutions customers, combined, accounted for about 11.110.2 percent of our consolidated net sales.

Specialty Wheat Starches - Wheat starch is derived from the carbohydrate bearingcarbohydrate-bearing portion of wheat flour.  We produce a premium wheat starch powder by extracting the starch from the starch slurry, substantially free of all impurities and fibers, and then dry the starch in spray, flash, or drum dryers.

A substantial portion of our premium wheat starch is altered during processing to produce certain unique specialty wheat starches designed for special applications.  We sell our specialty wheat starches on a global basis, primarily to food processors and distributors.

We market our specialty wheat starches under the trademarks Fibersym®Fibersym® Resistant Starch series, FiberRite®FiberRite® RW Resistant Starch, Pregel®Pregel® Instant Starch series, and Midsol®Midsol® Cook-up Starch series. They are used primarily for food applications as an ingredient in a variety of food products to affect their nutritional profile, appearance, texture, tenderness, taste, palatability, cooking temperature, stability, viscosity, binding, and freeze-thaw characteristics.  Important physical properties contributed by wheat starch include whiteness, clean flavor, viscosity, and texture.  For example, our starches are used to improve the taste and texture of cream puffs, éclairs, puddings, pie fillings, breading, and batters; to improve the size, symmetry, and taste of angel food cakes; to alter the viscosity of soups, sauces, and gravies; to improve the freeze-thaw stability and shelf life of fruit pies and other frozen foods; to improve moisture retention in microwavable foods; and to add stability and to improve spreadability in frostings, mixes, glazes, and sugar coatings.
 


Our wheat starches, as a whole, generally compete primarily with corn starch, which dominates the United States starch market.  However, the unique characteristics of our specialty wheat starches provide a number of advantages over corn and other starches for certain baking and other end uses.
 


Specialty Wheat Proteins - We have developed a number of specialty wheat proteins for food applications. Specialty wheat proteins are derived from vital wheat gluten through a variety of proprietary processes which change its molecular structure.  Specialty wheat proteins for food applications include the products inArise® and Trutex®.

In June 2017, we announced the Arise® , Optein®,addition of new clean label ingredients to our Arise® line of wheat protein isolates. Along with Arise® 8000, this new series includes Arise® 8100 and Trutex®. Arise® 8200. Each of these ingredients is also Non-GMO Project Verified. In September 2017, we announced additions to our extensive Non-GMO Project Verified food ingredients portfolio of TruTex® 751, TruTex® 1501, TruTex® 2240, and TruTex® Redishred 65 textured wheat proteins.

Our specialty wheat proteins generally compete with other ingredients and modified proteins having similar characteristics, primarily soy proteins and other wheat proteins, with differentiation being based on factors such as functionality, price, and, in the case of food applications, flavor.

Commodity Wheat StarchStarches - As is the case with value added wheat starches, our commodity wheat starch hasstarches have both food and non-food applications, but such applications are more limited than those of value added wheat starches and typically sell for a lower price in the marketplace.  Commodity wheat starch competesstarches compete primarily with corn starches, which dominate the marketplace and prices generally track the fluctuations in the corn starch market.

Commodity Wheat Proteins - Commodity wheat protein, or vital wheat gluten, is a free-flowing light tan powder which contains approximately 70 to 80 percent protein.  When we process wheat flour to derive starch, we also derive vital wheat gluten.  Vital wheat gluten is added by bakeries and food processors to baked goods, such as breads, and to pet foods, cereals, processed meats, and fish and poultry to improve the nutritional content, texture, strength, shape, and volume of the product.  The neutral flavor and color of vital wheat gluten also enhances the flavor and color of certain foods.  The cohesiveness and elasticity of the gluten enables the dough in wheat and other high protein breads to rise and to support added ingredients, such as whole cracked grains, raisins and fibers.  This allows bakers to make an array of different breads by varying the gluten content of the dough.  Vital wheat gluten is also added to white breads, hot dog buns, and hamburger buns to improve the strength and cohesiveness of the product.

COMPETITIVE CONDITION

TheWhile we believe that the overall market environment offers considerable growth opportunities for us in 2018 and beyond, the markets in which our products are sold are competitive. Our products compete against similar products of many large and small companies. In our distillery products segment, competition is based primarily on product innovation, product characteristics, functionality, price, service, and quality factors, such as flavor. In our ingredient solutions segment, competition is based primarily on product innovation, product characteristics, price, name, color, flavor, or other properties that affect how the ingredient is being used.

PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, AND LICENSES
 
We are involved in a number of patent related activities.patent-related activities, primarily within our ingredient solutions segment.  We have filed patent applications to protect a range of inventions made in our expanding research and development efforts, including inventions relating to applications for our products.  Some of these patents or licenses cover significant product formulation and processes used to manufacture our products.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
During 2016, 2015, and 2014, we incurred $916, and $748, and $1,622 respectively, on research and development activities. Research and development activities allow us to develop products across both of our segments to respond to changing consumer trends.

SEASONALITY
 
Our sales are generally not seasonal.

TRANSPORTATION
 
Historically, our output has been transported to customers by truck and rail, most of which is provided by common carriers. We use third party transportation companies to help us manage truck and rail carriers who deliver our products to our North American customers. As of December 31, 2016,2017, we leased 207223 rail cars under operating leases.  

        


RAW MATERIALS AND PACKAGING MATERIALS

Our principal distillery products segment raw materials, or input costs, are corn and other grains (including rye, barley, wheat, barley malt, and milo), which are processed into food grade alcohol and distillery co-products consisting of distillers feed, fuel grade alcohol, and corn oil. Our principal ingredient solutions segment raw material is wheat flour, which is processed into starches and proteins.  The cost of grain has, at times, been subject to substantial fluctuation.

In 2016,2017, we purchased most of our grain requirements from two suppliers, Bunge Milling, Inc. ("Bunge") and Consolidated Grain and Barge Co. ("CGB"). Our current grain supply contracts with Bunge Milling and CGB both expire on December 31, 2017. These2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. Through these contracts, permit us towe purchase grain for delivery up to 12 months into the future at negotiated prices based on a formula using several factors.  We also order wheat flour anywhere from one to 24 monthsfor delivery into the future.future at negotiated prices based on several factors.  We provide for our wheat flour requirements through a supply contract with Ardent Mills, which has a term that expires July 10, 2019. We typically enter contracts for future delivery only to protect margins on contracted alcohol sales, expected ingredient sales, and general usage.

Our principal packaging material for our distillery products segment is oak barrels. Both new and used barrels are utilized for the aging of premium bourbon and rye whiskeys. We purchase oak barrels from multiple suppliers and some customers supply their own barrels.

We also source food grade alcohol from Pacific Ethanol Central, LLC ("Pacific Ethanol"), formerly Illinois Corn Processing, LLC ("ICP"), which was our 30 percent ownedpercent-owned joint venture. See additionalventure until July 3, 2017 when it was divested and sold to Pacific Ethanol. Additional information related to ICP and the divestiture is in "Equity Method Investments" below, the MD&A, and Note 3.

ENERGY
 
We use naturalNatural gas is an input cost used to operate boilers that we use to make steam heat.  We procure natural gas for our facilities in the open market from various suppliers.  We have a risk management program whereby we may purchase contracts for the delivery of natural gas infor delivery into the future at predeterminednegotiated prices based on several factors, or we can purchase futures contracts on the exchange.  Depending on existing market conditions, in Atchison we have theuse our ability to transport gas through a gas pipeline owned by a wholly-owned subsidiary.  Historically, prices of natural gas have been higher in the late fall and winter months than during other periods. 

EMPLOYEES

As of December 31, 2016,2017, we had a total of 311317 employees.  A collective bargaining agreement covering 10599 employees at the Atchison facility expires on August 31, 2019.  AnotherA collective bargaining agreement covering 6062 employees at the Lawrenceburg facility expires on December 31, 2017.2022.  We consider our relations with our personnel generally to be good.

REGULATION
 
We are subject to a broad range of federal, state, local, and foreign laws and regulations intended to protect public health and the environment.  Our operations are also subject to regulation by various federal agencies, including the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Trade Bureau ("TTB"), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration ("OSHA"), the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") and the U.S.United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"), and by various state and local authorities.  Such laws and regulations cover virtually every aspect of our operations, including production and storage facilities, distillation and maturation requirements, importing ingredients, distribution of beverage alcohol products, marketing, pricing, labeling, packaging, advertising, water usage, waste water discharge, disposal of hazardous wastes and emissions, and other matters. In addition, beverage alcohol products are subject to customs duties or excise taxation in many countries, including taxation at the federal, state, and local level in the United States.

        
TTB regulation includes periodic TTB audits of all production reports, shipping documents, and licenses to assure that proper records are maintained.  We are also required to file and maintain monthly reports with the TTB of alcohol inventories and shipments.

EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS

Illinois Corn Processing, LLC ("ICP"). OnIn November 20, 2009, we completed a series of related transactions pursuant to form ICP, which we contributed our Pekin facility and certain maintenance and repair materials to a newly-formed company, ICP, and then sold 50 percent of the membership interest in ICP to ICP Holdings, an affiliate of SEACOR.  ICP reactivated distillery operations at the Pekin facility during the quarter ended March 31, 2010, and now producesproduced high quality food grade alcohol, chemical intermediates, and fuel.



In connection with these transactions, we entered into various agreements with ICP and ICP Holdings, including a Contribution Agreement, an affiliate of SEACOR Holdings, Inc. One of the agreements was the LLC Interest Purchase Agreement and a Limited Liability Company Agreement. Under the LLC Interest Purchase Agreement,under which we sold ICP Holdings 50 percent of the membership interest in ICP.  This agreement also gave ICP Holdings the option to purchase up to an additional 20 percent of the membership interest in ICP, at any time between the second and fifth anniversary based on agreed to criteria.  On February 1, 2012, ICP Holdings exercised its option and purchased an additional 20 percent from us, for $9,103, reducing our ownership from 50 percent to 30 percent.

Pursuant to the Limited Liability Company Agreement, control of day to day operations generally is retained by the members, acting by a majority in interest.  Following ICP Holdings' exercise of its option referred to above, ICP Holdings owns 70 percent of ICP and generally is entitled to control its day to day operations. The Limited Liability Company Agreement also provides for the creation of an advisory board which consists of two advisers appointed by us and four advisers appointed by ICP Holdings.  All actions of the advisory board require majority approval of the entire board, except that any transaction between ICP and ICP Holdings or its affiliates must be approved by the advisers appointed by us. The Limited Liability Company Agreement gives either member certain rights to shut down the facility if it operates at a loss.  Such rights are conditional in certain instances but absolute if EBITDA (as defined in the agreement) losses are an aggregate $1,500 over any three consecutive quarters or if ICP's net working capital is less than $2,500.  ICP Holdings also has the right to shut down the facility if ICP is in default under its loan agreement for failure to pay principal or interest for two months.

On April 9, 2015,July 3, 2017, we sold our 30 percent equity ownership interest in ICP obtained a $30,000 revolving credit facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., which may be increased in the future byto Pacific Ethanol pursuant to an additional $20,000, subject to lender approval. The revolver maturesAgreement and Plan of Merger ("Merger Agreement") entered into on April 9, 2018. Simultaneous with the execution of the April 2015 revolving credit facility, ICP terminated its $15,000 amended and restated revolving credit facility withJune 26, 2017. Illinois Corn Processing Holdings, Inc., an affiliate of SEACOR which would have matured January 31, 2016. We have no obligationHoldings, Inc., held the remaining equity in ICP that was also sold pursuant to provide additional funding to ICP.the Merger Agreement (Note 3).

D.M. Ingredients GmbH ("DMI").  In 2007, we acquired a 50 percent interest in DMI, a German joint venture company that producesproduced certain of our specialty ingredients products through a toller for distribution in the European Union ("E.U.") and elsewhere.

On December 29, 2014, we gave notice to D.M. Ingredients, GmbH, ("DMI")DMI and to our partner in DMI, Crespel and Dieters GmbH & Co. KG ("C&D"), to terminate our joint venture effective June 30, 2015. C&D also provided notice to terminate DMI effective June 30, 2015. On June 22, 2015, a termination agreement was executed by and between us, DMI, and C&D to dissolve DMI effective June 30, 2015. On June 22, 2015 a termination agreement was executed by and between us and DMI to terminate our distribution agreement effective June 29, 2015. Under German law, commencing on June 30, 2015, normal operations for DMI ceased and, under German law, a one year winding down process began once the registration of resolutions, appointment of liquidators, inventory count, and publication of the notice to potential creditors was complete, which occurred on October 29, 2015. On December 23, 2016, we received our portion of the remaining DMI liquidation proceeds which totaled $351, as a return of our investment.investment (Note 3).




EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Our officers as of December 31, 20162017 and their ages as of March 8, 2017 are listed below.

1, 2018:
NameAgePositionFirst elected to officer position
Augustus C. Griffin57President and Chief Executive Officer2014
Thomas K. Pigott52Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer2015
Stephen J. Glaser56Vice President, Production and Engineering2015
David E. Dykstra53Vice President, Alcohol Sales and Marketing2009
Michael R. Buttshaw54Vice President, Ingredient Sales and Marketing2014
David E. Rindom61Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer2000
Andrew P. Mansinne57Vice President, Brands2016
NameAgePrincipal Occupation and Business Experience
Augustus C. Griffin58President and Chief Executive Officer for the Company since July 2014 and member of the Board of Directors for the Company since August 2014. Executive Vice President of Marketing for Next Level Spirits from April 2013 to January 2014. Brand and Business Consultant for Nelson's Green Brier Distillery from November 2011 to March 2013. Senior Vice President, Global Managing Director for Brown Forman Corporation's flagship Jack Daniels business from January 2008 to April 2011.
Thomas K. Pigott53Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer for the Company since September 2015. Vice President of Finance for the Kraft Foods Group Meal Solutions Division from March 2015 to August 2015. Vice President of Finance for the Kraft Foods Group Meals and Desserts Business Unit from May 2014 to March 2015. Vice President of Finance and Chief Audit Executive for the Kraft Foods Group from October 2012 to April 2014. Vice President of Finance for the Pizza Division at Nestle, U.S.A. from April 2010 to October 2012.
Stephen J. Glaser57Vice President, Production and Engineering for the Company since October 2015. Corporate Director of Operations for the Company from January 2014 to October 2015. Plant Manager for the Company of the Atchison facility from May 2011 to December 2013.
David E. Dykstra54Vice President, Alcohol Sales and Marketing for the Company since 2009.
Michael R. Buttshaw55Vice President, Ingredient Sales and Marketing for the Company since December 2014. Vice President of Sales for the ingredient group at Southeastern Mills, Inc. from October 2010 to November 2014.
David E. Rindom62Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer for the Company since December 2015. Vice President, Human Resources for the Company from June 2000 to December 2015.
Andrew P. Mansinne58Vice President, Brands for the Company since November 2016. Managing director at Intercontinental Beverage Capital and President of Tattico Strategies from March 2015 to October 2016. President of Aveniu Brands from May 2010 to April 2014.

Mr. Griffin has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of MGP since July 2014 and as a member of the Board of Directors since August 2014. Prior to joining MGP, Mr. Griffin served from April 2013 to January 2014 as Executive Vice President of Marketing for Next Level Spirits, a northern California based producer, importer and distributor of premium wine and spirits brands. Between November 2011 and March 2013, he served as Brand and Business Consultant for Nelson’s Green Brier Distillery. From January 2008 to April 2011, Mr. Griffin was Senior Vice President, Global Managing Director of Brown Forman Corporation's flagship Jack Daniels business. Prior to 2008, he served for over 20 years in increasingly important brand management and general management leadership roles at Brown Forman.
Mr. Pigott has served as Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer since September 2015. Prior to joining MGP, Mr. Pigott served in various Vice President roles with Kraft Foods Group. He was Vice President of Finance for the Meal Solutions Division from March 2015 to August 2015, Vice President of Finance for the Meals and Desserts Business Unit from May 2014 to March 2015, and Vice President of Finance and Chief Audit Executive from October 2012 to April 2014. From April 2010 to October 2012, Mr. Pigott was Vice President of Finance for the Pizza Division at Nestle, U.S.A., and from March 2010 to May 2010, he was Senior Director of Finance for the Pizza Division at Nestle, U.S.A. Prior to joining Nestle, between 1994 and 2010, Mr. Pigott held a succession of chief financial officer and other financial leadership positions across a wide number of operating divisions at Kraft Foods. His experience spans financial planning, analysis, audit and investor relations functions.
Mr. Glaser has served as Vice President of Production and Engineering at MGP since October 2015. Previously, he was Corporate Director of Operations since January 2014 and Plant Manager of the Company’s Atchison, Kansas, facility from May 2011 to December 2013. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Glaser served for three years, from March 2008 to April 2011, as President and Chief Executive Officer of Briggs Industries, a leading, multi-site international kitchen and bath products business, following three years as Vice President of Operations for the company. Preceding his employment at Briggs, he held supply chain related positions with increased responsibility at Sony Electronics, Ingersoll Rand’s Schlage Lock Company, and Electrolux Home Products.

Mr. Dykstra has served as Vice President of Alcohol Sales and Marketing at MGP since 2009.  He previously had been Industrial Alcohol Sales manager since 2006.  He first joined the Company in 1988 eventually serving as Director of Sales for both beverage and fuel grade alcohol.  In 1999, he left the Company to assume the role of Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Abengoa Bio Energy.  He remained in that position until 2003, when he joined United Bio Energy Fuels, L.L.C. as Vice President of the alcohol marketing division. He returned to MGP in 2006. 

Mr. Buttshaw has served as Vice President of Ingredients Sales and Marketing at MGP since December 2014. He previously served from October 2010 to November 2014 as Vice President of Sales for the ingredient group at Southeastern Mills, Inc. Just prior to that, Mr. Buttshaw was Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Penford Food Ingredients. This followed two years as Vice President of Sales and Business Development-specialty enzymes for DSM Food Specialties. From 1985 to 2008, Mr. Buttshaw was employed with Hormel Foods Corporation.

Mr. Rindom has served as Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer at MGP since December 2015. He previously served as the Company's Vice President, Human Resources since June 2000.  Mr. Rindom was Corporate Director of Human Relations from 1992 to June 2000, Personnel Director from 1988 to 1992, and Assistant Personnel Director from 1984 to 1988 after his employment with the Company began in 1980.
        



Mr. Mansinne has served as Vice President of Brands since November 2016. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Mansinne served as a managing director at Intercontinental Beverage Capital, as well as President of Tattico Strategies, in Bethesda, Maryland, from March 2015 through October 2016. Between May 2010 and April 2014, Mr. Mansinne was President of Aveniu Brands in Baltimore. He also served as Chief Executive Officer of DOmedia, Columbus, Ohio, from 2008 to 2010 following a year as Vice President of Marketing for Fosters Wine Estates, Napa, California. Mr. Mansinne served as a Senior Vice President at Brown-Forman Corporation, Louisville, Kentucky, where he began as Brand Director in 1995. Prior to 1995, Mr. Mansinne served in marketing and product management roles with other major consumer products companies, including The Quaker Oats Company, G. Heileman Brewing Company, and Ralston Purina Company.

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS
 
Our business is subject to certain risks and uncertainties.uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from forward looking statements.  The following discussion identifies those which we consider to be most important. The following discussion of risks is not all inclusive. Additional risks not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
 
RISKS THAT AFFECT OUR BUSINESS AS A WHOLE
 
An interruption of operations, a catastrophic event at our facilities, or a disruption of transportation services could negatively affect our business.

Although we maintain insurance coverage for various property damage and loss events, an interruption in or loss of operations at either of our production facilities or the facilities of ICP, could reduce or postpone production of our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and/or financial condition. To the extent that our value added products rely on unique or proprietary processes or techniques, replacing lost production by purchasing from outside suppliers becomes morewould be difficult.

Our customers store a substantial amount of barreled inventory of aged premium bourbon and rye whiskeys at our Lawrenceburg facility. If there was a catastrophic event at our Lawrenceburg facility, our customers' business could be adversely affected. The loss of a significant amount of aged inventory through fire, natural disaster, or otherwise could result in a significant reduction in supply of the affected product or products and if we are negligent in the custodial care of our customers' inventory, this could result in customer claims against us.

We also store a substantial amount of our own inventory of aged premium bourbon and rye whiskeys at our Lawrenceburg facility. If there was a catastrophic event at our Lawrenceburg facility, our business, financial condition, or results of operations could be adversely affected. The loss of a significant amount of our aged inventory through fire, natural disaster, or otherwise, could result in a reduction in supply of the affected product or products and could affect our long-term growth.

A disruption in transportation services could result in difficulties supplying materials to our facilities and impact our ability to deliver products to our customers in a timely manner.manner, and our business, financial condition, or results of operations could be adversely affected.

Our profitability is affected by the costs of energy, grain, and wheat flour, and natural gas, or input costs, that we use in our business, the availability and costcosts of which are subject to weather and other factors beyond our control.  We may not be able to recover the costs of commodities and energy by increasing our selling prices.
  
Grain and wheat flour costs are a significant portion of our costs of goods sold. Historically, the cost of such raw materials has, at times, been subject to substantial fluctuation, depending upon a number of factors which affect commodity prices in general and over which we have no control.  These include crop conditions, weather, disease, plantings, government programs and policies, competition for acquisition of inputs such as agricultural commodities, purchases by foreign governments, and changes in demand resulting from population growth and customer preferences.  The price of natural gas also fluctuates based on anticipated changes in supply and demand, weather, and the prices of alternative fuels.  Fluctuations in the price of commodities and natural gas can be sudden and volatile at times and have had, from time to time, significant adverse effects on the results of our operations. Higher energy costs could result in higher transportation costs and other operating costs.



We do not enter into futures and options contracts ourselves because we can purchase grain and wheat flour for delivery up to 12 months into the future under our grain and wheat flour supply agreements.  We intend to contract for the future delivery of grain and wheat flour only to protect margins on expected sales.  On the portion of volume not hedged,contracted, we will attempt to recover higher commodity costs through higher selling prices, but market considerations may not always permit this.this result.  Even where prices can be adjusted, there wouldis likely be a lag between when we experience higher commodity or natural gas costs and when we might be able to increase prices.  To the extent we are unable to timely pass increases in the cost of raw materials to our customers under sales contracts, market fluctuations in the cost of grain, natural gas, and ethanol may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations and financial condition.  operations.  



We source our grainhave a high concentration of certain raw material and wheat flourfinished goods purchases from a limited number of suppliers.suppliers which exposes us to risk.
 
We have signed supply agreements with Bunge Milling and CGB for our grain supply (primarily corn) and with Ardent Mills for our wheat flour. The Company also procures some textured wheat proteins through a third-party toll manufacturer in the United States. If any of these companies encounters an operational or financial issue, or otherwise cannot meet our supply demands, it could lead to an interruption in supply to us and/or higher prices than those we have negotiated or than are available in the market at the time.

Risks related to our 30 percent equity method investmenttime, and in ICP:

ICP, like many others in the ethanol industry, in 2014 experienced high levels of profitability, resulting inturn, have a disproportionate share of our improvement in net income for the year ended December 31, 2014, and those levels may not recur. Because of ICP's strong financial performance, ICP was able to distribute cash to us, but this may not recur.

Our proportionate share of the profits of ICP has in the recent past had a significant positive impactmaterial adverse effect on our net income. The earnings performance in 2014 was due to strong margins in the productionbusiness, financial condition, or results of chemical intermediates and high quality alcohol. The margins were driven primarily by a low current supply and strong demand for these products and for fuel grade alcohol, which affected their pricing. From 2014 to 2015, while ICP experienced lower sales volumes and a lower average per unit selling price, our proportionate share of the earnings of ICP results continued to have a positive impact on our earnings. From 2015 to 2016, while ICP has experienced higher sales volumes, per unit average selling prices were lower, reflective of less favorable market conditions than recent years and resulting in a lower positive impact to our earnings. We currently expect that ICP's recent levels of profitability may not be sustained and, as a consequence, that ICP's contributions to our future net income may be reduced.

On December 4, 2014, we received a $4,835 cash dividend distribution from ICP. On February 26, 2016, we received a second cash dividend distribution from ICP in the amount of $3,300, which was our 30 percent ownership share of the total distribution (see Notes 3 and 14). There is no assurance cash dividend distributions will be received from ICP in the future.

We have a minority interest in ICP, which limits our ability to influence ICP's operations and profitability. 

We have a minority interest in ICP of 30 percent, and have only two representatives on the six member Advisory Board of ICP. Our minority ownership position and limited advisory role mean that our ability to influence operating decisions and affect profitability of the joint venture is limited. We do not control ICP's operations, strategies, or financial decisions. The majority equity owner may have economic, business or legal interests that are inconsistent with our goals or the goals we would set for ICP. We are dependent on the management of ICP and the other members of the Advisory Board to operate the joint venture profitably and take our interests into account. We must rely on others to implement beneficial management strategies, including appropriate risk management, internal controls over financial reporting, and compliance monitoring. The ICP Limited Liability Company Agreement generally allocates the profits, losses and distributions of cash of ICP based on our percentage membership interest in ICP, which is derived from our capital contributions to ICP relative to the total contributions to ICP from all members. Our proportionate share of the earnings and losses are reflected in our financial statements. Any cash distributions from ICP (other than certain mandatory distributions for tax liabilities) must be approved by the Advisory Board, which we do not control.


Our ability to supply our industrial alcohol business is highly dependent on sourcing the product from ICP or unaffiliated third parties.

ICP has been an important source of industrial alcohol in the past and we expect this to continue into the foreseeable future along with other third party sources. While we plan to continue to source industrial alcohol from ICP in 2017, ICP is under no obligation to sell to us. If we are unsuccessful in sourcing product from ICP or other sources, our ability to supply our industrial alcohol business at current levels could be impacted.

We have incurred impairment and restructuring charges in the past and may suffer such charges in the future.

We review long-lived assets and goodwill for impairment at year end or if events or circumstances indicate that usage may be limited and carrying values may not be recoverable. Should events indicate that assets cannot be used as planned, the realization from alternative uses or disposal is compared to their carrying value. If an impairment loss is measured, this estimate is recognized and affects our profitability. Considerable judgment is used in these measurements, and a change in the assumptions could result in a different determination of impairment loss and/or the amount of any impairment.operations.

The markets for our products are very competitive, and our resultsbusiness could be adverselynegatively affected if we do not compete effectively.
 
The markets for products in which we participate are very competitive. Our principal competitors in these markets have substantial financial, marketing, and other resources, and several are much larger enterprises than us.

We are dependent on being able to generate net sales and other operating income in excess of costthe costs of products sold in order to obtain margins, profits, and cash flows to meet or exceed our targeted financial performance measures.  Competition is based on such factors as product innovation, product characteristics, product quality, pricing, color, and name.  Pricing of our products is partly dependent upon industry processing capacity, which is impacted by competitor actions to bring online idled capacity or to build new production capacity.  If market conditions make our products too expensive for use in consumer goods, our revenues could be affected.  If our principal competitors were to decrease their pricing, we could choose to do the same, which could adversely affect our margins and profitability.  If we did not do the same, our revenues could be adversely affected due to the potential loss of sales or market share. Our revenue growth could also be adversely affected if we are not successful in developing new products for our customers or as a result of new product introductions by our competitors.  In addition, more stringent new customer demands may require us to make internal investments to achieve or sustain competitive advantage and meet customer expectations.

Unsuccessful research activities or product launches could affect our profitability.business.

Research activities and product launch activities are inherently uncertain.  The failure to launch a new product successfully cancould give rise to inventory write offswrite-offs and other costs and cancould affect consumer perception of an existing brand. Any significant changes in consumer preferences and failure to anticipate and react to such changes could result in reduced demand for our products.  If we were to have unsuccessful research activities or product launches, our profitabilitybusiness, financial condition, or results of operations could be adversely affected.

Work disruptions or stoppages by our unionized workforce could cause interruptions in our operations.

As of December 31, 2016,2017, approximately 165161 of our 311317 employees were members of a union.  Although our relations with our two unions are stable and our labor contracts do not expire until December 2017 and August 2019 and December 2022, there is no assurance that we will not experience work disruptions or stoppages in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, andfinancial condition, or results of operations and could adversely affect our relationships with our customers.

If we were to lose any of our key management personnel, we may not be able to fully implement our strategic plan, our system of internal controls could be impacted, and our operating results could be adversely affected.impacted.

We rely on the continued services of key personnel involved in management, finance, product development, sales, manufacturing and distribution, and, in particular, upon the efforts and abilities of our executive management team.  The loss of service of any of our key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and on our system of internal controls.  



If we cannot attract and retain key management personnel, or if our search for qualified personnel is prolonged, our system of internal controls may be affected, which could lead to an adverse effect on our operating results.business, financial condition, or results of operations. In addition, it could be difficult, time consuming, and expensive to replace any key management member or other critical personnel, and no guarantee exists that we will be able to recruit suitable replacements or assimilate new key management personnel into our organization.



Covenants and other provisions in our credit facilityarrangements could hinder our ability to operate.  Our failure to comply with covenants in our credit facilityarrangements could result in the acceleration of the debt extended under such facility,agreements, limit our liquidity, and trigger other rights of our lenders.

Our credit agreement containsarrangements (Item 5 and Note 5) contain a number of financial and other covenants that include provisions which require us, in certain circumstances, to meet certain financial tests.  These covenants could hinder our ability to operate and could reduce our profitability.  In addition, our credit agreement permits the lender to modify borrowing base and advance rates, the effect of which may limit our available credit under the agreement. The lender may also terminate or accelerate our obligations under theour credit agreementarrangements upon the occurrence of various events in addition to payment defaults and other breaches.  Any acceleration of our debt modification to reduce our borrowing base, or termination of our credit agreementarrangements would negatively impact our overall liquidity and maymight require us to take other actions to preserve any remaining liquidity.  Although we anticipate that we will be able to meet the covenants in our credit agreement,arrangements, there can be no assurance that we will do so, as there are a number of external factors that affect our operations over which we have little or no control.control, that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Product recalls or other product liability claims could materially and adverselynegatively affect us.our business.

Selling products for human consumption involves inherent legal and other risks, including product contamination, spoilage, product tampering, allergens, or other adulteration. We could decide to, or be required to, recall products due to suspected or confirmed product contamination, adulteration, misbranding, tampering, or other deficiencies. Although we maintain product recall insurance, product recalls or market withdrawals could result in significant losses due to their costs, the destruction of product inventory, and lost sales due to the unavailability of the product for a period of time. We could be adversely affected if our customers lose confidence in the safety and quality of certain of our products, or if consumers lose confidence in the food and beverage safety system generally. AdverseNegative attention about these types of concerns, whether or not valid, may damage our reputation, discourage consumers from buying our products, or cause production and delivery disruptions.
 
We may also suffer losses if our products or operations cause injury, illness, or death. In addition, our marketingwe could face claims of false or deceptive advertising or other criticism. A significant product liability or other legal judgment or a related regulatory enforcement action against us, or a significant product recall, may materially and adversely affect our reputation and profitability. Moreover, even if a product liability or other legal or regulatory claim is unsuccessful, has no merit, or is not pursued, the negative publicity surrounding assertions against our products or processes could materially and adversely affecthave a material adverse effect our product sales,business, financial condition, and operating results.or results of operations.

We are subject to extensive regulation and taxation, andas well as compliance with existing or future laws and regulations, which may require us to incur substantial expenditures.
 
We are subject to a broad range of federal, state, local, and foreign laws and regulations relatingintended to the protection of theprotect public health and the environment.  Our operations are also subject to regulation by various federal agencies, including the TTB, OSHA, the FDA, and the EPA, and by various state and local authorities.  Such laws and regulations cover virtually every aspect of our operations, including production and storage facilities, distillation and maturation requirements, importing ingredients, distribution of beverage alcohol products, marketing, pricing, labeling, packaging, advertising, water usage, waste water discharge, disposal of hazardous wastes and emissions, and other matters. In addition, beverage alcohol products are subject to customs, duties, or excise taxation in many countries, including taxation at the federal, state, and local level in the United States.

Violations of any of these laws and regulations may result in administrative, civil, or criminal fines or penalties being levied against us, including temporary or prolonged cessation of production, revocation or modification of permits, performance of environmental investigatory or remedial activities, voluntary or involuntary product recalls, or a cease and desist order against operations that are not in compliance.compliance with applicable laws. These laws and regulations may change in the future and we may incur material costs in our efforts to comply with current or future laws and regulations. These matters may have a material adverse effect on our business, and financial results.condition, or results of operations.

        


A failure of one or more of our key information technology systems, networks, processes, associated sites, or service providers could have a material adversenegative impact on our business.
    
We rely on information technology ("IT") systems, networks, and services, including internet sites, data hosting and processing facilities and tools, hardware (including laptops and mobile devices), software and technical applications and platforms, some of which are managed and hosted by third party vendors to assist us in the management of our business. The various uses of these IT systems, networks, and services include, but are not limited to: hosting our internal network and communication systems; enterprise resource planning; processing transactions; summarizing and reporting results of operations; business plans, and financial information; complying with regulatory, legal, or tax requirements; providing data security; and handling other processes necessary to manage our business. Although we have ansome offsite backup systemsystems and a disaster recovery plan, any failure of our information systems could adversely impact our ability to operate.  Routine maintenance or development of new information systems may result in systems failures, which may adversely affecthave a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations and financial results.operations. 

Increased IT security threats and more sophisticated cyber crime pose a potential risk to the security of our IT systems, networks, and services, as well as the confidentiality, availability, and integrity of our data. This can lead to outside parties having access to our privileged data or strategic information, our employees, or our customers.  Any breach of our data security systems or failure of our information systems may have a material adverse impact on our business operations and financial results.  If the IT systems, networks, or service providers we rely upon fail to function properly, or if we suffer a loss or disclosure of business or other sensitive information due to any number of causes, ranging from catastrophic events to power outages to security breaches, and our disaster recovery plans do not effectively address these failures on a timely basis, we may suffer interruptions in our ability to manage operations and reputational, competitive, or business harm, which may adversely affecthave a material adverse effect on our business, operationsfinancial condition, or financial condition.results of operations. In addition, such events could result in unauthorized disclosure of material confidential information, and we may suffer financial and reputational damage because of lost or misappropriated confidential information belonging to us or to our partners, our employees, customers, and suppliers. Although we maintain insurance coverage for various cybersecurity risks, in any of these events, we could also be required to spend significant financial and other resources to remedy the damage caused by a security breach or to repair or replace networks and IT systems.

Damage to our reputation, or that of any of our key customers or their brands, could affect our stock price and business performance.

The success of our products depends in part upon the positive image that consumers have of the third party brands that use our products.  Contamination, whether arising accidentally or through deliberate third party action, or other events that harm the integrity or consumer support for our and/or our customers' products and could affect the demand for our and/or our customers' products. Unfavorable media, whether accurate or not, related to our industry, or to us, or our products, or to the brands that use our products, marketing, personnel, operations, business performance, or prospects could negatively affect our corporate reputation, stock price, ability to attract high quality talent, or the performance of our business. AdverseNegative publicity or negative commentary on social media outlets could cause consumers to react rapidly by avoiding our brands or by choosing brands offered by our competitors, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

We may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property rights or may be accused of infringing intellectual property rights of third parties.

We regard our trademarks, service marks, copyrights, patents, trade dress, trade secrets, proprietary technology, and similar intellectual property as critical to our success, and we rely on trademark, copyright, and patent law, trade secret protection, and confidentiality and/or license agreements with our employees, customers, and others to protect our proprietary rights.  We may not be able to discover or determine the extent of any unauthorized use of our proprietary rights. Third parties that license our proprietary rights also may take actions that diminish the value of our proprietary rights or reputation. The protection of our intellectual property may require the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources. Moreover, the steps we take to protect our intellectual property may not adequately protect our rights or prevent third parties from infringing or misappropriating our proprietary rights.



Our intellectual property rights may not be upheld if challenged. Such claims, if they are proved, could materially and adversely affect our business and may lead to the impairment of the amounts recorded for goodwill and other intangible assets. If we are unable to maintain the proprietary nature of our technologies, we may lose any competitive advantage provided by our intellectual property. We and our customers and other users of our products may be subject to allegations that we or they or certain uses of our products infringe the intellectual property rights of third parties. The outcome of any litigation is inherently uncertain. Any intellectual property claims, with or without merit, could be time-consuming and expensive to resolve, could divert management attention from executing our business plan, and could require us or our customers or other users of our products to change business practices, pay monetary damages, or enter into licensing or similar arrangements. Any adverse determination related to intellectual property claims or litigation could be material to our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Climate change, or legal, regulatory or market measures to address climate change, may negatively affect our business or operations, and water scarcity or quality could negatively impact our production costs and capacity.
Increasing concentrations of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere may have an adverse effect on global temperatures, weather patterns, and the frequency and severity of extreme weather events and natural disasters. In the event that climate change, or legal, regulatory, or market measures enacted to address climate change, has a negative effect on agricultural productivity in the regions from which we procure agricultural products such as corn and wheat, we could be subject to decreased availability or increased prices for a such agricultural products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Water is the main ingredient in substantially all of our distillery products and is necessary for the production of our food ingredients. It is also a limited resource, facing unprecedented changes from climate change, increasing pollution, and poor management. As demand for water continues to increase, water becomes more scarce and the quality of available water deteriorates, we may be affected by increasing production costs or capacity constraints, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, and financial condition.

condition, or results of operations.

RISKS SPECIFIC TO OUR DISTILLERY PRODUCTS SEGMENT

The relationship between the price we pay for grain and the sales prices of our distillery co-products can fluctuate significantly and affectnegatively impact our results of operations.business.

Distillers feed, fuel grade alcohol, and corn oil are the principal co-products of our alcohol production process and can contribute in varying degrees to the profitability of our distillery products segment.  Distillers feed and corn oil are sold for prices which historically have tracked the price of corn, but certain of our co-products compete with similar products made from other plant feedstocks, the cost of which may not have risen in unison with corn prices.  We sell fuel grade alcohol, the prices for which typically, but not always, have tracked price fluctuations in gasoline prices.  As a result, the profitability of these products could be affected.


adversely affected, which could be material to our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Our strategic plan involves significant investment in the aging of barreled distillate. Decisions concerning the quantity of maturing stock of our aged distillate could materially affect our future profitability.

There is an inherent risk in determining the quantity of maturing stock of aged distillate to lay down in a given year for future sales as a result of changes in consumer demand, pricing, new brand launches, changes in product cycles, and other factors. Demand for products can change significantly between the time of production and the date of sale. It may be more difficult to make accurate predictionpredictions regarding new products and brands. Inaccurate decisions and/or estimations could lead to an inability to supply future demand or lead to a future surplus of inventory and consequent write downwrite-down in the value of maturing stocks of aged distillate.  As a result, profitabilityour business, financial condition, or results of the distillery products segmentoperations could be materially adversely affected.



If the brands we develop or acquire do not achieve consumer acceptance, our growth may be limited, which could have a material adverse impact on our operating results.business, financial condition, or results of operations.

A component of our strategic plan is to develop our own brands, particularly whiskeys. Risks related to this strategy include:

Because our brands, internally developed and acquired, are early in their growth cycle or have not yet been developed, they have not achieved extensive brand recognition. Accordingly, if consumers do not accept our brands, we will not be able to penetrate our markets and our growth may be limited.
We depend, in part, on the marketing initiatives and efforts of our independent distributors in promoting our products and creating consumer demand, and we have limited, or no, control regarding their promotional initiatives or the success of their efforts. 
We depend on our independent distributors to distribute our products. The failure or inability of even a few of our independent distributors to adequately distribute our products within their territories could harm our sales and result in a decline in our results of operations.
We compete for shelf space in retail stores and for marketing focus by our independent distributors, most of whom carry extensive product portfolios.
The laws and regulations of several states prohibit changes of independent distributors, except under certain limited circumstances, making it difficult to terminate an independent distributor for poor performance without reasonable cause, as defined by applicable statutes. Any difficulty or inability to replace independent distributors, poor performance of our major independent distributors or our inability to collect accounts receivable from our major independent distributors could harm our business. There can be no assurance that the independent distributors and retailers we use will continue to purchase our products or provide our products with adequate levels of promotional support.
Our brands compete with the brands of our bulk alcohol customers.

Warehouse expansion issues could affectnegatively impact our operations and/or adversely affectand our financial results.business.

On October 21, 2015, we announced a major expansion in warehousing capacity on a 20-acre campus adjoining the Company's current Lawrenceburg facility. Our Board of Directors has approved additional investments for the project, for a total approved investment of $29,000.capacity. The program includes both the refurbishment of existing warehouse buildings and the construction of new warehouses. The first projects included in this program were completed in late 2015, with additional projects completed in 2016. Additional warehouse capacity included in the total approved2016 and 2017. This program is expected to be completed bycontinued into the end of 2018.future. There is the potential risk of completion delays, including risk of delay associated with required permits and cost overruns, which could affecthave a material adverse effect our business, financial condition, andor results of operations.

Water scarcity or quality could negatively impact our production costs and capacity.

Water is the main ingredient in substantially all of our distillery products. It is also a limited resource, facing unprecedented challenges from climate change, increasing pollution, and poor management. As demand for water continues to increase, water becomes more scarce and the quality of available water deteriorates, we may be affected by increasing production costs or capacity constraints, which could adversely affect our results of operations, business and financial results.

We may be subject to litigation directed at the beverage alcohol industry.

Companies in the beverage alcohol industry are, from time to time, exposed to class action or other litigation relating to alcohol advertising, product liability, alcohol abuse problems or health consequences from the misuse of alcohol. Such litigation may result in damages, penalties or fines as well as damage to our reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows,business, financial condition, and financial results.or results of operations.



AdverseA change in public opinion about alcohol could reduce demand for our products.

In recentFor many years, there has been increaseda high level of social and political attention directed at the beverage alcohol industry.  The recent attention has focused largely on public health concerns related to alcohol abuse, including drunk driving, underage drinking, and the negative health impacts of the abuse and misuse of beverage alcohol.

Anti-alcohol groups have, in the past, advocated successfully for more stringent labeling requirements, higher taxes, and other regulations designed to discourage alcohol consumption.  More restrictive regulations, higher taxes, negative publicity regarding alcohol consumption and/or changes in consumer perceptions of the relative healthfulness or safety of beverage alcohol could decrease sales and consumption of alcohol, and thus, the demand for our products.  This could, in turn, significantly decrease both our revenues and our revenue growth and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.



Changes in consumer preferences and purchases, and our ability to anticipate or react to them, could negatively affect our business results.

We compete in highly competitive markets, and our success depends on our continued ability to offer our customers and consumers appealing, high-quality products. In recent years there has been increased demand for the products we produce, including, in particular, increased demand for bourbons and rye whiskeys.  Customer and consumer preferences and purchases may shift due to a host of factors, many of which are difficult to predict, including:
demographic and social trends;
economic conditions;
public health policies and initiatives;
changes in government regulation and taxation of beverage alcohol products;
the potential expansion of legalization of, and increased acceptance or use of, marijuana; and
changes in travel, leisure, dining, entertaining, and beverage consumption trends.

If our customers and consumers shift away from spirits(particularly brown spirits, such as our premium bourbon and rye whiskeys), our business, financial condition, or results of operations business and financial results.

could be adversely affected.

RISKS SPECIFIC TO OUR INGREDIENT SOLUTIONS SEGMENT
 
Our focus on higher margin specialty ingredients may make us more reliant on fewer, more profitable customer relationships.
 
Our strategic plan for our ingredient solutions segment includes focusing our efforts on the sale of specialty proteins and starches to targeted domestic consumer packaged goods customers.  Our major focus is directed at food ingredients, which are primarily used in foods that are developed to address consumers’ desire for healthier and more convenient products; these consist of dietary fiber, wheat protein isolates and concentrates, and textured wheat proteins.  The bulk of our applications technology and research and development efforts are dedicated to providing customers with specialty ingredient solutions that deliver nutritional benefits, as well as desired functional and sensory qualities to their products.  Our business, financial condition, and financial results of operations could be materially adversely affected if our customers were to reduce their new product development ("NPD") activities or cease using our unique dietary fibers, starches, and proteins in their NPD efforts.

Products competing with our Fibersym®Fibersym® resistant starch could lead to a decrease in sales volume or pricing, a decrease in margins and lower profitability.

Our patent rights to Fibersym® expire inFibersym® expired on June 6, 2017. We face competition with our Fibersym®Fibersym® resistant starch. The competition could lead to diminished returns and lower our margins. This factor could result in significant costs and could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flowsfinancial condition, and financial results.results of operations.
In November 2016, we announced that we filed a citizen petition with the FDA asking the agency to further confirm the status of our patented Fibersym®Fibersym® RW and FiberRite®FiberRite® RW resistant wheat starches as dietary fiber. A list of dietary fibers is currently being developed by the FDA under new food labeling rules, which were published on May 27, 2016 and havehad a scheduled compliance date of July 26, 2018. While our citizen petition is undergoing review, the current status of Fibersym®Fibersym® RW, along with FiberRite®FiberRite® RW, as accepted dietary fiber and a recognized fiber fortifying ingredient remains in place. A delay in confirmation by the FDA of our patented Fibersym®Fibersym® RW and FiberRite®FiberRite® RW resistant wheat starches as dietary fiber under the new food labeling rules in a timely manner could have a material adverse impact on ingredient solutions segment operating results.
Adverse public opinion about any of our specialty ingredients could reduce demand for our products.
Consumer preferences with respect to our specialty ingredients might change. In fact, in recent years, we have noticed shifting consumer preferences and media attention directed to gluten, gluten intolerance, and "clean label" products. Shifting consumer preferences could decrease demand for our specialty ingredients. This could, in turn, significantly decrease our revenues and revenue growth, which could have a material adverse affect on our cash flows,business, financial condition, and financial results.results of operations.
        



RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK

Common Stockholders have limited rights under our Articles of Incorporation.
 
Under our Articles of Incorporation, holders of our Preferred Stock are entitled to elect five of our nine directors and only holders of our Preferred Stock are entitled to vote with respect to a merger, dissolution, lease, exchange or sale of substantially all of our assets, or on an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation, unless such action would increase or decrease the authorized shares or par value of the Common or Preferred Stock, or change the powers, preferences or special rights of the Common or Preferred Stock so as to affect the holders of Common Stock adversely.  Generally, the Common Stock and Preferred Stock vote as separate classes on all other matters requiring stockholder approval.  

The majority of the outstanding shares of our Preferred Stock is beneficially owned by one individual, who is effectively in control of the election of five of our nine directors under our Articles of Incorporation.
The trading volume in our Common Stock fluctuates depending on market conditions. The sale of a substantial number of shares in the public market could depress the price of our stock and make it difficult for stockholders to sell their shares.

Our Common Stock is listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market. Our public float at December 31, 2016 was approximately 12,712,845 shares, as approximately 3,945,920 shares are held by affiliates. Over the year ended December 31, 2016, our daily trading volume as reported to us by NASDAQ has fluctuated from 31,600 to 3,103,500 shares (excluding block trades). When trading volumes are relatively light, significant price changes can occur even when a relatively small number of shares are being traded and an investor’s ability to quickly sell quantities of stock may be affected.

ITEM 1B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
 
None.

ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES

MGP has twothree primary locations: Atchison,locations, one in Kansas, one in Indiana, and Lawrenceburg and Greendale, Indiana.one in Kentucky. Grain processing, distillery, warehousing, research and quality control laboratories, principal executive office buildingoffices, and thea technical innovation center are located in Atchison, Kansas on a 28.5 acre campus. A distillery, warehousing, tank farm, quality control laboratory, and research and development facilitiesfacility are located in Lawrenceburg and Greendale, Indiana on a 78 acre campus.campus that spans portions of both Lawrenceburg and Greendale, Indiana. A warehousing facility is located on 33 acres in Williamstown, Kentucky, and is not yet in service.

These facilities are generally in good operating condition and are generally suitable for the business activity conducted therein.  We have existing manufacturing capacity to grow our ingredient solutions business at our Atchison facility, as needed.  All of our production facilities, executive office building, and technical innovation center are owned, and all of our owned properties are subject to mortgages in favor of one or more of our lenders.  We also own or lease transportation equipment and facilities and a gas pipeline as described under Item 1. Business - Transportation and Item 1. Business - Energy.

ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On December 21, 2016, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) issued a Notice of Violation to the Company alleging the Company commenced construction of new aging warehouses for whiskey at its facility in Lawrenceburg, Indiana, without first applying for or obtaining a Clean Air Act permit and without adequately demonstrating to the EPA that emissions control equipment did not need to be installed to meet applicable air quality standards. The Company notes that neither EPA nor the State of Indiana have required emission control equipment for aging whiskey warehouses and, to our knowledge, no other distillers in the U.S. have been required to install emissions control equipment in their aging whiskey warehouses. No demand for a penalty has been made in connection with the Notice of Violation, but the Company believes it is probable that a penalty will be assessed. Although it is not possible to reasonably estimate a loss or range of loss at the date of this filing, the Company currently does not expect that the amount of any such penalty or related remedies would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.None.
ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
 
Not applicable.
        


PART II
 
ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Equity compensation plans’plan information is incorporated by reference from Part III, Item 12, “Security"Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters," of this document, should be considered an integral part of Item 5. Our Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. At March 3, 2017,Market under the ticker symbol MGPI.  As of February 23, 2018, there were approximately 533415 holders of record of our Common Stock. According to reports received from NASDAQ, the average daily trading volume of our Common Stock (excluding block trades) ranged from 31,60044,900 to 3,103,500918,300 shares during the year ended December 31, 2016.2017. 

HISTORICAL STOCK PRICES AND DIVIDENDS
 
The table below reflects the high and low sales prices of our Common Stock and the details of dividends and dividend equivalents per share for each quarter of 20162017 and 2015:2016:
 
Stock Sales Price Dividend and Dividend Equivalent Information (per Share and Unit)Stock Sales Price Dividend and Dividend Equivalent Information (per Share and Unit)
High Low Declared Paid
2017       
First Quarter$56.17
 $41.16
 $0.04
 $0.04
Second Quarter58.00
 47.64
 0.04
 0.04
Third Quarter62.00
 49.58
 0.89
 0.89
Fourth Quarter80.75
 60.30
 0.04
 0.04
High Low Declared Paid 
  
 $1.01
 $1.01
2016              
First Quarter$26.52
 $19.91
 $0.08
 $
$26.52
 $19.91
 $0.08
 $
Second Quarter39.50
 22.11
 
 0.08
39.50
 22.11
 
 0.08
Third Quarter44.25
 33.38
 0.02
 0.02
44.25
 33.38
 0.02
 0.02
Fourth Quarter53.22
 31.93
 0.02
 0.02
53.22
 31.93
 0.02
 0.02
 
  
 $0.12
 $0.12
    $0.12
 $0.12
2015       
First Quarter$16.71
 $13.06
 $0.06
 $
Second Quarter19.22
 12.32
 
 0.06
Third Quarter17.31
 12.85
 
 
Fourth Quarter27.56
 15.56
 
 
    $0.06
 $0.06

Our credit agreement (the "Credit Agreement") with Wells Fargo Bank, allowsNational Association ("N.A.") (the "Credit Agreement") and our Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement (the "Note Purchase Agreement") with PGIM, Inc. ("Prudential Capital Group") (Note 5) allow for the payment of cash dividends (asas defined in Restricted Payments of the Credit Agreement), which are limited to $2,000.Agreement and the Note Purchase Agreement.  Restricted Payments are allowed to exceed $2,000 provided we maintain Excess Availabilityas long as no Default exists, or will exist, after giving effect thereto on the date thereof, and on a Pro Forma Basis as if the Restricted Payment occurred on the last day of 17.5 percent of the Total Facility Amount and a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio for the most recently completed 12 months of at least 1.10:1.00, or if Excess Availability exceeds 25 percent of the Total Facility Amountended four-fiscal quarter period (with the terms "Restricted Payments," "Excess Availability," "Total Facility Amount,"Default and "Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio"Pro Forma Basis as defined in the Credit Agreement and the Note Purchase Agreement) (Note 5).

On February 15, 2017,21, 2018, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend payable to stockholders of record as of March 1, 2017,9, 2018, of our Common Stock and a dividend equivalent payable to holders of RSUsrestricted stock units ("RSUs") as of March 1, 2017,9, 2018, of $0.04$0.08 per share and per unit.  The dividend payment and dividend equivalent payment will occur on March 24, 2017.23, 2018.
 
We expect to continue our policy of paying quarterly cash dividends, although there is no assurance as to the declaration or amount of any future dividends because they are dependent on future earnings, capital requirements, and debt service obligations.

        


STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH

The following graph compares the cumulative total return of our Common Stock for the five year period ended December 31, 2016,2017, against the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Stock Index (broad market comparison), Russell 3000 - Beverage and Distillers (line of business comparison), and Russell 2000 - Consumer Staples (line of business comparison). The graph assumes $100 (one hundred dollars) was invested on December 31, 2011,2012, and that all dividends were reinvested.

        


PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY ISSUER
 
We did not sell equity securities during the quarter ended December 31, 2016.2017.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
  
(a) Total
Number of
Shares (or
Units)
Purchased
  
(b) Average
Price Paid
per Share (or
Unit)
  
(c) Total
Number of
Shares (or
Units)
Purchased as
Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
 
(d) Maximum
Number (or
Approximate
Dollar Value) of
Shares (or Units)
that May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs
October 1, 2017 through October 31, 2017 
  
  
 
November 1, 2017 through November 30, 2017 42,663
(a) 
 $74.21
  
 
December 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 1,653
(a) 
 72.96
  
 
Total 44,316
     
  

(a) Total
Number of
Shares (or
Units)
Purchased
(b) Average
Price Paid
per Share (or
Unit)
(c) Total
Number of
Shares (or
Units)
Purchased as
Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
(d) Maximum
Number (or
Approximate
Dollar Value) of
Shares (or Units)
Vested RSU awards under the 2004 Plan that May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs
October 1, 2016 through October 31, 2016



November 1, 2016 through November 30, 2016



December 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016



Total

were purchased to cover employee withholding taxes.


        


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA AND SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 Year Ended December 31,
 
2017(a)(e)(g)(h)
 
2016(a)(e)(f)
 
2015(a)
 
2014(a)(b)
 
2013(c)
Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) Data:         
Net sales$347,448
 $318,263
 $327,604
 $313,403
 $323,264
Income (loss) before income taxes(d)
$52,758
 $44,717
 $38,418
 $25,940
 $(6,521)
Net income (loss)$41,823
 $31,184
 $26,191
 $23,675
 $(4,929)
          
Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share ("EPS")         
Income (loss) from continuing operations$2.44
 $1.82
 $1.48
 $1.32
 $(0.34)
Income from discontinued operations
 
 
 
 0.05
Net income (loss)$2.44
 $1.82
 $1.48
 $1.32
 $(0.29)
          
Dividends and Dividend Equivalents Per Common Share$1.01
 $0.12
 $0.06
 $0.05
 $0.05
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:         
Total assets$240,328
 $225,336
 $194,310
 $160,215
 $151,329
Long-term debt, less current maturities$24,182
 $31,642
 $30,115
 $7,286
 $21,611
 Year Ended December 31,
 
2016(a)(h)(i)
 
2015(a)
 
2014(a),(b)
 
2013(c)
 
2012(d)
Consolidated Statements of Income Data:         
Net sales$318,263
 $327,604
 $313,403
 $323,264
 $334,335
Income before income taxes(e)
$44,717
 $38,418
 $25,940
 $(6,521) $1,942
Net income (loss)$31,184
 $26,191
 $23,675
 $(4,929) $1,624
          
Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share ("EPS")         
Income (loss) from continuing operations$1.82
 $1.48
 $1.32
 $(0.34) $0.09
Income from discontinued operations
 
 
 0.05
 
Net income (loss)$1.82
 $1.48
 $1.32
 $(0.29) $0.09
          
Cash dividends per common share$0.12
 $0.06
 $0.05
 $0.05
 $0.05
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:         
Total assets(f)
$225,336
 $194,310
 $160,215
 $151,329
 $163,171
Long-term debt, less current maturities(f)(g)
31,642
 $30,115
 $7,286
 $21,611
 $31,061

(a) 
During 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014, we determined that we would more likely than not realize a portion of our deferred tax asset and reduced the valuation allowance by $578, $718, $2,385, and $7,446, respectively. The 2014 reduction amount included an adjustment to other comprehensive loss of $172.
(b) 
In January 2014 and October 2014, we experienced a fire at one of our facilities. Insurance recoveries totaled $8,290 for 2014.
(c) 
In connection with the proxy contest related to our 2013 Annual Meeting of stockholders, we were involved in various proceedings with respect to MGP Ingredients, Inc. Voting Trust, the 2013 Annual Meeting, and the Special Committee of the Board of Directors and incurred $5,465 of expenses in 2013.
(d) 
Net income for 2012 includes a $4,055 gain related to the sale of a 20 percent interest in our joint venture, ICP.
(e)
ForIn 2013 we reported discontinued operations. Accordingly, the caption for 2013 was Loss from continuing operations before income taxes.
(f)
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes. The ASU was effective for public business entities for interim and annual periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The intent of the new standard was to simplify reporting of deferred taxes.  As such, the standard allows netting of current and non-current deferred taxes within a reporting jurisdiction and the resulting deferred tax assets and liabilities are presented as non-current in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2016 and 2015 since we elected to early adopt the ASU on a prospective basis. The balance sheet classifications for years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 were not adjusted to be consistent with 2016 and 2015 reporting.
(g)
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30), which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. Our consolidated balance sheets have been adjusted and retrospectively adjusted at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, for the presentation of debt issuance costs as required by ASU 2015-03. As of December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, we had $576, $636, and $384, respectively, of unamortized loan fees related to our debt that was reclassified as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability in the consolidated balance sheets. Years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were not adjusted to be consistent with 2016, 2015, and 2014 reporting.
(h)(e) 
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. We elected to early adopt the accounting update in the quarter ended September 30,ASU and, for 2017 and 2016, and, due to a required change in accounting principle required by the ASU adoption and the vesting of 128,500 shares of restricted stock during the quarter of adoption, werespectively, received a combined federal and state tax effected excess tax benefit of $4,625 and $1,571 from windfalls related to employee share-based compensation that was recognized as a reduction to income tax expense. Years ended December 31,Retrospective application to 2015, 2014, and 2013 and 2012 werewas not adjusted to be consistent with 2016 reporting.required.
(i)(f) 
Net income for 2016 included a legal settlement agreement and a gain on sale of long-lived assets totaling $3,385.of $3,385 before tax.

(g)
On July 3, 2017, we completed the sale of our 30 percent equity ownership interest in ICP to Pacific Ethanol, consistent with a Merger Agreement entered into on June 26, 2017, and, as a result, recorded a gain on sale of equity method investment of $11,381 before tax, which is included in Net income for 2017 (Note 3).
(h)
On December 22, 2017, the United States enacted tax reform legislation commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Tax Act"), resulting in significant modifications to existing law. Following the guidance in SEC Staff Bulletin 118 ("SAB 118"), we recorded a provisional discrete net tax benefit in our Consolidated Statements of Income through net income of $3,343 in 2017. The ultimate impact may differ from the provisional amount, possibly materially, due to, among other things, additional analysis, changes in interpretations and assumptions we made, additional regulatory guidance that may be issued, and action we may take as a result of the Tax Act (Note 6).

Selected Financial Information

Selected quarterly financial information is detailed in Note 15.

        


ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
CAUTIONARY NOTE CONCERNING FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS

This Report on Form 10-K contains forward looking statements as well as historical information.  All statements, other than statements of historical facts, regarding the prospects of our industry and our prospects, plans, financial position, and strategic plan may constitute forward looking statements.  In addition, forward looking statements are usually identified by or are associated with such words as "intend," "plan," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "anticipate," "hopeful," "should," "may," "will," "could," "encouraged," "opportunities," "potential," and/or the negatives or variations of these terms or similar terminology.  Forward looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward looking statements. A detailed discussion of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from such forward looking statements is included in the section titled "Risk Factors" (Item 1A of this Form 10-K). Forward looking statements are made as of the date of this report, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward looking statements, whether because of new information, future events or otherwise.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is designed to provide a reader of MGP’s consolidated financial statements with a narrative from the perspective of management. MGP’s MD&A is presented in eight sections:
 
Overview    
Results of Operations
Distillery Products Segment
Ingredient Solutions Segment
Cash Flow, Financial Condition and Liquidity
Off Balance Sheet Obligations
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
New Accounting Pronouncements

OVERVIEW
 
MGP is a leading producer and supplier of premium distilled spirits and specialty wheat proteinsprotein and starches.starch food ingredients. Distilled spirits include premium bourbon and rye whiskeys and grain neutral spirits,GNS, including vodka and gin. We are also a top producer of high quality industrial alcohol for use in both food and non-food applications. Our proteinsprotein and starchesstarch food ingredients provide a host of functional, nutritional and sensory benefits for a wide range of food products to serve the packaged goods industry. We have two reportable segments: our distillery products segment and our ingredient solutions segment.

Our Mission

Secure our future by consistently delivering superior financial results by more fully participating in all levels of the alcohol and food ingredients segments for the betterment of our shareholders, employees, partners, consumers, and communities.

Our Strategic Plan

Our strategic plan is designed to leverage our history and strengths. We have a long history in the distilling industry. Our Lawrenceburg facility, which we purchased in 2011, was founded in 1847 and our Atchison facility was opened in 1941. Through these two distilleries, we are involved in producing some of the finest whiskeys, vodkas, and gins in the world. Likewise, our history in the food ingredient business stretches back more than 60 years.

Our strategic plan seeks to leverage the positive macro trends we see in the industries where we compete while providing better insulation from outside factors, including swings in commodity pricing.  We believe the successful execution of our strategy will deliver strong operating income growth.growth in 2018 and beyond. Specifically, our strategic plan is built on five key growth strategies: Maximize Value, Capture Value Share, Invest for Growth, Risk Management, and Build the MGP Brand. Each of these strategies, along with related 20162017 accomplishments, is discussed below.


        


Maximize Value - We focus on maximizing the value of our current production volumes, particularly taking advantage of favorable macro trends in our distillery products segment, such as the growth of the American whiskey category that has continued to expand over the past fiveseveral years. This includes shifting sales mix to higher margin products, such as premium bourbon and rye whiskeys, as well as extending the product range of our grain neutral spirits, including vodkas and gins. In our ingredient solutions segment, the macro trend includestrends include growth in high fiber, high protein, plant basedplant-based proteins, and non-genetically modified organisms ("non-GMO")non-GMO products.

Although these macro trends are currently favorable, we have seen competition intensify as industry participants in both of our segments seek to capitalize on consumers' interest in these categories. While we believe we are well-positioned to benefit from these favorable trends, we may also be negatively affected by the increase in competition in one or both of our segments. We intend to continue to focus on the opportunities that will allow us to achieve the highest value from our current production facilities.

Accomplishments

In March 2017, we announced the introduction of Non-GMO Project Verified GNS in our portfolio of premium distilled spirits, which consists of vodkas, gins, bourbons, and whiskeys. Our Non-GMO Project Verified GNS is produced in compliance with the Non-GMO Project Standard. Achieving this verification assures customers who require non-GMO products that we follow stringent best practices for GMO avoidance. The Non-GMO Project, a non-profit organization, offers North America’s only third party verification and labeling for non-GMO products.

In June 2017, we announced the addition of new clean label ingredients to our Arise® line of wheat protein isolates, and by fall 2017, our portfolio of Non-GMO Project Verified food ingredients included Arise® wheat protein isolates, HWG™ 2009 lightly hydrolyzed wheat protein, as well as TruTex® textured wheat proteins. In addition to providing protein enrichment, the Arise® protein isolates deliver a multitude of functional benefits across a wide range of bakery products and other food applications. Produced principally for use in vegetarian food applications, TruTex® develops a fibrous structure when hydrated and can be customized to take on the appearance beef, pork, poultry, and seafood.

Our shift in sales mix to higher margin products has contributed to a 17.6 percent increase in gross profit within the distillery products segment in 2017 over the prior year.

Our shift in sales mix to higher margin products has contributed to a 12.2 percent increase in gross profit within the distillery products segment in 2016 over the prior year.
Our shift in sales mix to higher margin products has contributed to a 7.38.9 percent increase in gross profit within the ingredient solutions segment in 20162017 over the prior year.
See the "--Distillery"Distillery Products Segment" and "--Ingredient"Ingredient Solutions Segment" discussions.

Capture Value Share - We will work to develop partnerships to support brand creation, and long-term growth, and to combine our innovation capabilities and industry expertise to provide unique solutions and offerings to the marketplace. In that way, we believe we will be able to realize full value for our operational capacity, quality, and commitment.

Accomplishments

In June 2017, we re-launched George Remus® Straight Bourbon Whiskey, a complex bourbon whiskey that showcases our signature, high-rye profile distilled at our Lawrenceburg facility. Initial distribution was in Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana, Kansas, Missouri, and Wisconsin. Distribution was further expanded to Nebraska, Minnesota, and Iowa later in 2017. We acquired the George Remus whiskey label in November 2016 from Queen City Whiskey LLC and have built on the brand’s existing reputation.
In March 2016, we announced the introduction of Till American Wheat Vodka®, distilled using the finest Kansas wheat, with initial distribution in the states of Kansas and Missouri. Within the first seven months following its release, Till American Wheat Vodka® had already received five prestigious awards, including a silver medal at each of the following: Sommelier Challenge™ International Wine and Spirits Competition in San Diego, the San Diego Spirits Festival, San Francisco World Spirits Competition, and the 2016 New York World Wine and Spirits Competition. The San Francisco World Spirits Competition and the New York event are each considered to be one of the most respected and influential spirits competitions of their type on an international scale. In May 2016, Till Vodka earned Beverage World magazine’s BevStar Gold Award in the spirits category. In October 2016, we announced that distribution was expanded to the states of Iowa and Indiana.
In September 2017, we announced the limited release of our first reserve bourbon. Remus® Repeal Reserve Straight Bourbon Whiskey was initially available in limited quantities in Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Fairfield County, Connecticut. Remus® Repeal Reserve Straight Bourbon Whiskey is distilled at our Lawrenceburg facility.

In November 2017, we announced the 2017 fall release of Tanner's Creek® Blended Bourbon Whiskey, named for an Indiana waterway with ties to the earliest days of American distilling. Tanner's Creek® reflects our high-rye style of bourbon and is distilled at our Lawrenceburg facility.


In November 2016, we acquired the George Remus® brand from Queen City Whiskey LLC. The prior owner used sourced whiskey from us to launch and successfully build the brand in a small geography. The George Remus® brand portfolio currently consists of three expressions: George Remus® Bourbon Whiskey, George Remus® Rye Whiskey, and George Remus® Limited Edition Rye Whiskey. At the time of the acquisition, distribution was limited to the states of Ohio, Kentucky and Indiana.

In 2017, distribution of TILL American Wheat Vodka® was expanded to Kentucky, Nebraska, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Ohio.

Invest for Growth - We are committed to investing to support our growth. Components of this growth strategy include:
Capital Expenditures:Capital expenditures focus largely on supporting innovation and product development, improving operational reliability, and strengthening our ability to support all aspects of growth in the whiskey category.
Select Inventories: As demand grows for American whiskeys, in both the United States and global markets, we are building our inventories of aged premium whiskeys to fully participate in this growth. This initiative helps us build strong partnerships and open new relationships with potential customers, in addition to supporting the development of our own brands.
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses ("SG&A"): As needed to support our long-term growth objectives, resources and capabilities are being added, particularly in sales and marketing, as well as in research and development.marketing.



Accomplishments

Regarding our Capital Expenditures growth strategy:
On October 21, 2015,In 2017, we announced a $16,400 majorcontinued our warehouse expansion in warehousing capacity on a twenty acre campus adjoiningprogram as part of the implementation of our current Lawrenceburg facility. Our Boardstrategic plan to support the growth of Directors has since approved an additional $12,600 of funding for the project, for a total approved investment of $29,000.American whiskey category. The program includes both the refurbishment of existing warehouse buildings and the construction of new warehouses. The first projects includedWe invested over $5,000 in this program were completed in late 2015, withcapital expenditures during 2017 and approximately $26,000 since the remaining projects included in the total approved program expected to be completed in 2018.program's inception.
Regarding our Select Inventories growth strategy:
Given the available and anticipated barrel inventory capacity atof our Lawrenceburg facility,warehouses, we produce, and will continue to produce, certain volumes of premium bourbon and rye whiskeys that are in addition to current customer demand.  Product is barreled and included in our inventory.  Our goal is to maintain inventory levels of premium bourbon and rye whiskeys sufficient to support our own brands, engage in strategic partnerships, and sell on the wholesale market. We increased our premium bourbon and rye whiskey inventory by $22,663,$14,785, at cost, during 2016.2017.
Regarding our SG&A growth strategy:
We madecontinued to invest in people and programs to support the below changes in certaindevelopment of our MGP brands platform.
We added a key management position in August 2017 when we appointed Thomas "T.J." Lynn to the newly created position of General Counsel and BoardCorporate Secretary. In his previous role as a partner of Directors positions.Stinson Leonard Street LLP (since 2008), he led significant corporate finance and merger and acquisition transactions for a number of regional and national clients. He also has extensive experience in advising publicly-held companies, including the Company, on compliance with securities laws and with respect to corporate governance matters.
1.In May 2016, James L. Bareuther was elected to serve as a director to fill a vacancy. Mr. Bareuther served as chief operating officer of Brown-Forman Corporation from 2003 until his retirement in 2010. He has served as a director of First Beverage Group since 2012 and as chairman of its board of directors since April 2014.

2.Effective November 2016, we appointed wine and spirits industry leader Andrew Mansinne to the newly created position of Vice President of Brands. Mr. Mansinne served for the past year as a managing director at Intercontinental Beverage Capital, as well as President of Tattico Strategies, which he founded, in Bethesda, Maryland. Mr. Mansinne served from 1995 to 2007 at Brown-Forman Corporation, Louisville, Kentucky, where he held increasingly important positions during his tenure from Brand Director to Senior Vice President.

Risk Management - We will continue a strong disciplined approach to risk management, including robust analysis and prudent decision making, to minimize the impact of commodity pricing, and to promote adherence to established procedures, controls, and authority levels.

AccomplishmentsAccomplishment

In 2016,June 2017, we announced that we entered into a merger agreement with an affiliate of SEACOR Holdings, Inc. and Pacific Ethanol Central, LLC that resulted in a sale of our 30 percent equity ownership interest in ICP to Pacific Ethanol. The sale of ICP enables us to fully focus on growing our core businesses of premium beverage alcohol and specialty ingredients products. This transaction is another step in our strategic plan to realize the Company's full potential for our shareholders.



In 2017, we completed a British Retail Consortium ("BRC") audit with outstanding results, achieving a Grade AA rating for both our Atchison and Lawrenceburg facilities. ThePer the BRC standard, a Grade AA is awarded if five or fewer non-conformances are cited out of 256 total audit items, and our Atchison facility earnedreceived zero non-conformances. Each year since undergoing its initial BRC audit in 2013, the Atchison facility's distillery has achieved BRC’s highest grade. The same is true with results of annual BRC audits that have been conducted at our Lawrenceburg facility since 2014. For the Atchison facility's protein and starch plant, 2017 marked the seventh time in as many years that it had scored the BRC’s highest food and beverage safety rating and the Lawrenceburg facility earned the BRC's highest beverage safety rating, which were previously measured on a scale with a maximum score of Grade A.
In September 2016, we completed the initial implementation of our Enterprise Risk Management program. The ongoing program will include identifying additional risk mitigation opportunities, re-prioritizing risks, as needed, and the continuing monitoring and reporting of results to management and the Board of Directors.rating.

Build the MGP Brand - We will continue to build our brand across all stakeholders, including shareholders, employees, partners, consumers, and communities. We willintend to achieve this by producing consistent growth through an understandable business model, proactively engaging with the investment community, creating a desirable organization for our employees, strengthening our relationship with our customers and vendors, increasing awareness and understanding of MGP with our consumers, and supporting the communities in which we operate.

Accomplishments

In August 2017, we announced the successful completion of a new $150,000 revolving credit facility agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and entered into a $20,000 term loan agreement with Prudential Capital Group. The new credit facility and fixed-rate term loan provides us with additional flexibility to support our long-term growth initiatives and enhance shareholder value.
In September 2017, we paid a special dividend of 85 cents per share of common stock, providing evidence of our ability to deliver strong returns to our shareholders. The successful sale of ICP, combined with our strong core cash flow generated by operations, solid balance sheet, and favorable access to credit markets gave us the financial and operational flexibility to continue to grow our business in 2017 while allowing us to provide shareholders with this special dividend.
In November 2017 we were named Supplier of the Year by a global leader in beverage alcohol, validating the success of our efforts to build strong partnerships with our customers.
In 2017, we continued our unbroken commitment to support our communities by providing strong financial support and donating time and leadership talent.

        


Accomplishments

2016 marked the 75th anniversary of our founding in 1941 by the late Cloud L. Cray, Sr. Observances tied to the theme "75 Years Strong" occurred throughout the year. One observance was on March 29, 2016, when Company leaders rang the closing bell for the Nasdaq stock exchange in New York City's Time Square.
In August 2016, we announced that MGP was honored by The Kansas Department of Commerce as one of 21 Regional Business Award winners across the state in recognition of our business achievements and high level of community support and involvement. This was the second time in just four years that MGP received the award.
Other 2016 Activities
Other activities in 2016 that contributed to our overall growth and strategic implementation are described below:

In August 2016, our Board of Directors announced the initiation of quarterly dividend declarations and payments, which recognizes our strong foundation and the progress we have made in delivering shareholder value. Going forward, we expect to be able to support our growth programs and maintain our capital base while returning capital to shareholders on a quarterly basis.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Consolidated results

The table below details the year-versus-year consolidated results:
Year Ended December 31, %Year Ended December 31, Year-Versus-Year % Increase (Decrease)
2016 2015 2014 2016 v. 2015 2015 v. 2014 2017 2016 2015 2017 v. 2016 2016 v. 2015 
Net sales$318,263
 $327,604
 $313,403
 (2.9)% 4.5 % $347,448
 $318,263
 $327,604
 9.2 % (2.9)% 
Cost of sales252,980
 269,071
 284,972
 (6.0) (5.6) 271,432
 252,980
 269,071
 7.3
 (6.0) 
Gross profit65,283
 58,533
 28,431
 11.5
 105.9
 76,016
 65,283
 58,533
 16.4
 11.5
 
Gross margin %20.5%
17.9%
9.1% 2.6
pp(a)
8.8
pp(a)
21.9%
20.5%
17.9% 1.4
pp(a)
2.6
pp(a)
SG&A expenses26,693
 25,683
 20,101
 3.9
 27.8
 33,107
 26,693
 25,683
 24.0
 3.9
 
Insurance recoveries
 
 (8,290) N/A
 N/A
 
Other operating (income) costs, net(3,385) 
 1
 N/A
 N/A
 
Other operating income, net
 (3,385) 
 N/A
 N/A
 
Operating income41,975
 32,850
 16,619
 27.8
 97.7
 42,909
 41,975
 32,850
 2.2
 27.8
 
Operating margin %13.2%
10.0% 5.3% 3.2
pp4.7
pp12.3%
13.2% 10.0% (0.9)pp3.2
pp
Equity method investment earnings4,036
 6,102
 10,137
 (33.9) (39.8) 
Gain on sale of equity method investment11,381
 
 
 N/A
 N/A
 
Equity method investment earnings (loss)(348) 4,036
 6,102
 (108.6) (33.9) 
Interest expense, net(1,294) (534) (816) 142.3
 (34.6) (1,184) (1,294) (534) (8.5) 142.3
 
Income before income taxes44,717

38,418

25,940
 16.4
 48.1
 52,758

44,717

38,418
 18.0
 16.4
 
Income tax expense13,533
 12,227
 2,265
 10.7
 439.8
 10,935
 13,533
 12,227
 (19.2) 10.7
 
Effective tax expense rate %30.3%
31.8% 8.7% (1.5)pp23.1
pp20.7%
30.3% 31.8% (9.6)pp(1.5)pp
Net income$31,184

$26,191

$23,675
 19.1 % 10.6 % $41,823

$31,184

$26,191
 34.1 % 19.1 % 
Net income margin %9.8%
8.0% 7.6% 1.8
pp0.4
pp12.0%
9.8% 8.0% 2.2
pp1.8
pp
        

         

 
Basic and diluted EPS$1.82
 $1.48
 $1.32
 23.0 % 12.1 % $2.44
 $1.82
 $1.48
 34.1 % 23.0 % 

(a) Percentage points ("pp").



Discussion of consolidated results (order follows above table):

Net sales

Net Sales 2017 to 2016 - Net sales for 2017 were $347,448, an increase of 9.2 percent compared to 2016, which was the result of increased net sales in both segments. Within the distillery segment, net sales were up 9.7 percent. Driven by strong demand, net sales of higher margin premium beverage alcohol products increased 18.4 percent, partially offset by a decline in industrial alcohol net sales, which resulted in a net increase in total food grade alcohol net sales of 11.9 percent. Warehouse services revenue related to the storage of barreled whiskey also increased, while lower margin distillers feed and related co-products net sales declined. Within the ingredient solutions segment, net sales were up 6.5 percent. Specialty wheat starches, commodity wheat starches, and specialty wheat proteins increased, while net sales of commodity wheat proteins declined (see Distillery Products Segment and Ingredient Solutions Segment sections).

Net Sales 2016 to 2015 - Net sales for 2016 were $318,263, a decrease of 2.9%2.9 percent compared to 2015. Within the distillery segment, net sales were down 1.8 percent. Food grade alcohol net sales were down 1.1 percent, as industrial alcohol net sales declined, while net sales of higher margin premium beverage alcohol products increased.increased 14.5 percent. Warehouse services revenue related to the storage of barreled whiskey also increased, while lower margin distillers feed and related co-products net sales declined. In the ingredient solutions segment, a net sales decline of 7.6%7.6 percent was driven by reductions across all product lines (see Distillery Products Segment Results below)and Ingredient Solutions Segment sections).



Gross profit

Net Sales 2015Gross profit 2017 to 20142016 - - Net salesGross profit for 2015 were $327,604,2017 was $76,016, an increase of 4.516.4 percent compared to 2014. This growth2016. The increase was primarily driven by a 5.3 percentan increase in net salesgross profit in both segments. In the distillery products segment. Distillery products net sales increased primarily as a result of an increase in food grade alcohol, which includes beverage alcohol. Net sales insegment, gross profit grew by $9,981, or 17.6 percent. In the ingredient solutions segment, as a whole increased 0.9gross profit grew by $752, or 8.9 percent due to strong net sales of specialty wheat starches, partially offset by declines in other segment products.(see Distillery Products Segment and Ingredient Solutions Segment results below).

Gross profit

Gross profit 2016 to 2015 - Gross profit for 2016 was $65,283, an increase of 11.5 percent compared to 2015. The increase was driven by a 2.6 percentage point increase in gross margin, partially offset by a decrease in net sales. The expansion in total Company gross margin was primarily driven by a continuing shift in overall product sales mix favoring higher value products, a decline in input costs, improved plant efficiencies, partially offset by a lower average selling price.

SG&A expenses

Gross profit 2015SG&A expenses 2017 to 20142016 - Gross profitSG&A expenses for 2015 was $58,533,2017 were $33,107, an increase of 105.924.0 percent compared to 2014.2016. The increase in SG&A was primarily driven bydue to investments in the MGP brands platform (personnel costs and advertising and promotion) and an 8.8 percentage point increase in gross margin, as well as the net sales growth. Gross margin expanded due to a higher average selling price despite lower raw material costs, favorable product sales mix, and improved plant efficiencies.incentive compensation.

SG&A expenses

SG&A expenses 2016 to 2015 - SG&A expenses for 2016 were $26,693, an increase of 3.9 percent compared to 2015. The increase in SG&A was primarily due to increased advertising and promotion, increased personnel costs, and increased professional fees, partially offset by a decrease in the accrual for incentive compensation and a decrease in severance costs.

SG&A expenses 2015 to 2014 - SG&A expenses for 2015 were $25,683, an increase of 27.8 percent compared to 2014. The increase in SG&A was primarily due to increases in professional fees, accruals for incentive compensation as a result of the strong performance of the Company, personnel and other costs, and severance costs.

Operating income
 Operating income  Change Operating income  Change
         
         
Operating income for 2015 and 2014 $32,850
   $16,619
   
Increase in gross profit - distillery products segment(a)
 6,174
 18.8
pp(b)
 28,330
 170.5
pp(b)
Increase in gross profit - ingredient solutions segment(a)
 576
 1.8
pp 1,772
 10.7
pp
Change in SG&A (1,010) (3.1)pp (5,582) (33.6)pp Operating income  Change year-versus-year Operating income  Change year-versus-year
Change in insurance recoveries 
 
 (8,290) (49.9)pp         
Change in other operating income, net 3,385
 10.3
pp 1
 
          
Operating income for 2016 and 2015Operating income for 2016 and 2015 $41,975
 27.8 % $32,850

97.7 % Operating income for 2016 and 2015 $41,975
   $32,850
   
Increase in gross profit - distillery products segment(a)
 9,981
 23.8
pp(b)
 6,174
 18.8
pp(b)
Increase in gross profit - ingredient solutions segment(a)
 752
 1.8
pp 576
 1.8
pp
Change in SG&A expenses (6,414) (15.3)pp (1,010) (3.1)pp
Change in other operating income, net (3,385) (8.1)pp 3,385
 10.3
pp
Operating income for 2017 and 2016Operating income for 2017 and 2016 $42,909
 2.2 % $41,975

27.8 % 

(a) See segment discussion.
(b) Percentage points ("pp").

Operating income 2017 to 2016 - Operating income for 2017 increased to $42,909 from $41,975 for 2016, due to gross profit growth in both our distillery products and ingredient solutions segments, partially offset by an increase in SG&A expenses and a decrease in other operating income, net (primarily income recorded related to a legal settlement agreement and a gain on sale of long-lived assets recorded in the prior year).

Operating income 2016 to 2015 - Operating income for 2016 increased to $41,975 from $32,850 for 2015, due to gross profit growth in both our distillery products segment and our ingredient solutions segment and an increase in other operating income, net, partially offset by an increase in SG&A expenses (see segment discussions below).expenses. Other operating income, net, increased over 2015, primarily due to income recorded related to a legal settlement agreement and a gain on sale of long-lived assets.


Gain on sale of equity method investment

Operating income 2015Gain on sale of equity method investment 2017 to 20142016 - Operating incomeOn July 3, 2017, we completed the sale of our 30 percent equity ownership interest in 2015 increasedICP to $32,850Pacific Ethanol, consistent with a Merger Agreement entered into on June 26, 2017. Our total transaction proceeds from $16,619the ICP sale transaction represented a return of our investment in 2014, primarily due to growth in our distillery productsICP of $22,832 (net of fees and ingredient solutions segments, partially offset byincluding additional dividends), which included a decrease in insurance recoveries and an increase in SG&A during the year. For 2015, we received no insurance recoveries related to property damage, compared to $8,290 received in 2014, which was accounted for as a reduction to our total expenses (see Note 16)gain on sale of equity method investment of $11,381 (before tax).

Equity method investment earnings (loss)

Equity method investment earnings 2017 to 2016 - Our equity method investment earnings decreased to a loss of $348 for 2017, from earnings of $4,036 for 2016. The decrease was due to the sale of our 30 percent equity ownership interest in ICP on July 3, 2017, resulting in the gain on sale of equity method investment described above, as well as lower operating results (Note 3).



Equity method investment earnings 2016 to 2015 - Our equity method investment earnings decreased to $4,036 for 2016, from $6,102 for 2015. The decrease in earnings was primarily due to ICP's lower per unit average selling price compared to a year ago2015 and a decrease in business interruption insurance proceeds, partially offset by higher sales volume, year-versus-year (see Note(Note 3). The lower per unit average selling price in 2016 reflected less favorable market conditions compared to previous recent years.

Equity method investment earnings 2015 to 2014 - Our equity method investment earnings decreased to $6,102 for 2015, from $10,137 for 2014. The decrease in earnings was primarily due to lower ICP sales volume and lower per unit average selling price compared to a year ago, partially offset by our $1,230 portion of ICP's receipt of $4,112 of insurance proceeds for business interruption during 2015 (see Note 3). The decline in sales volume was due to lower demand. The lower per unit average selling price reflected unfavorable market conditions compared to 2014.

Income tax expense

Income tax expense 2017 to 2016 - Income tax expense for 2017 was $10,935, for an effective tax rate for the year of 20.7 percent. Income tax expense for 2016 was $13,533, for an effective tax rate for the year of 30.3 percent. The principal reasons for the 9.6 percentage point reduction in the effective tax rate year-versus-year are a provisional re-measurement of our deferred tax assets and liabilities directly into income tax expense from continuing operations based on Tax Act, the impact of our adoption of ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, and state tax planning (Note 6).

On December 22, 2017, the United States enacted tax reform legislation, the Tax Act, that resulted in significant modifications to existing law. The Tax Act established new tax laws or modified existing tax laws starting in 2018, including, but not limited to, (1) reducing the federal corporate income tax rate to a flat 21 percent rate, (2) eliminating the corporate alternative minimum tax, (3) repealing the domestic production activity deduction, (4) adding a new limitation on deductible interest, (5) changing the limitations on the deductibility of certain executive compensation, and (6) starting in the quarter ended September 30, 2017, changing the bonus depreciation rules to allow full expensing of qualified property.
Following guidance in SAB 118, we recorded a provisional discrete net tax benefit in our Consolidated Statements of Income through net income of $3,343 in 2017. SAB 118 provides additional clarification regarding the application of Accounting Standards Codification 740 - Income Taxes ("ASC 740") in situations where we do not have the necessary information available to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act for the reporting period that includes the Tax Act’s enactment date and ending when we have the information needed in order to complete the accounting requirements, but in no circumstance should the measurement period extend beyond one year from the enactment date. In connection with our initial analysis, we recorded a provisional re-measurement of our deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the corporate rate reduction. The impact of the re-measurement was reflected in income tax expense, resulting in a reduction in our income tax expense for 2017 of $3,343. The ultimate impact may differ from the provisional amount, possibly materially, due to, among other things, additional analysis, changes in interpretations and assumptions we made, additional regulatory guidance that may be issued, and action we may take as a result of the Tax Act. The accounting is expected to be complete when our 2017 United States corporate income tax return is filed in 2018.
Income tax expense 2016 to 2015 - Income tax expense for 2016 was $13,533, for an effective tax rate for the periodyear of 30.3 percent. Income tax expense for 2015 was $12,227, for an effective tax rate for the periodyear of 31.8 percent. The principal reasons for the 1.5 percentage point reduction in our effective tax expense rate year-versus-year iswere the impact of our adoption of ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting in the current period,2016, which provided us with a tax benefit related to our accounting for share-based compensation, the federal domestic production activities deduction no longer being limited by our net operating loss carryovers from prior year periods,years, and the effect of state tax planning, including state income tax credits, partially offset by the release of a valuation allowance in the prior period (see Note2015 (Note 6).

Income tax expense 2015 to 2014 - Income tax expense increased to $12,227 for 2015, from $2,265 for 2014, resulting in an effective tax expense rate of 31.8 percent and 8.7 percent, respectively. The majority of the 23.1 percentage point increase in income tax expense year-over-year was due to the release of a portion of our valuation allowance in both years, which resulted in a reduction to income tax expense of $2,385 and $7,618 in 2015 and 2014, respectively.
        



Basic and diluted EPS
 Basic and Diluted EPS Change Basic and Diluted EPS Change  Basic and Diluted EPS Change year-versus-yearBasic and Diluted EPS Change year-versus-year
Basic and diluted EPS for 2015 and 2014 $1.48
   $1.32
   
Basic and diluted EPS for 2016 and 2015 $1.82
   $1.48
   
Change in operating income:                  
Operations(a)
 0.21
 14.2
pp(b)
1.30
 98.5
pp(b)
 0.17
 9.3
pp(b)
0.21
 14.2
pp(b)
Insurance recoveries(a)
 
 
 (0.44) (33.3)pp
Other operating income, net(a)
 0.13
 8.8
pp
 
  (0.13) (7.1)pp0.13
 8.8
pp
Change in equity method investments(a)
 (0.08) (5.4)pp(0.21) (15.9)pp
Gain on sale of equity method investment 0.44
 24.2
pp
 
 
Change in equity method investment earnings (loss)(a)
 (0.17) (9.3)pp(0.08) (5.4)pp
Change in interest expense(a)
 (0.03) (2.0)pp0.01
 0.7
pp 
 
 (0.03) (2.0)pp
Change in weighted average shares outstanding(c)
 0.05
 3.4
pp0.02
 1.5
pp (0.02) (1.1)pp0.05
 3.4
pp
Tax: Effect of Tax Act legislation(d)
 0.19
 10.4
pp
 
 
Tax: Change in valuation allowance (0.10) (6.8)pp
 
  
 
 (0.10) (6.8)pp
Tax: Implementation of ASU No. 2016-09 0.09
 6.1
pp
 
 
Tax: Change in effective tax rate (excluding tax items above for 2016) 0.07
 4.7
pp(0.52) (39.4)pp
Basic and diluted EPS for 2016 and 2015 $1.82
 23.0 % $1.48
 12.1 % 
Tax: Change in effect of implementation of ASU No. 2016-09 0.11
 6.0
pp0.09
 6.1
pp
Tax: Change in effective tax rate (excluding tax items above) 0.03
 1.7
pp0.07
 4.7
pp
Basic and diluted EPS for 2017 and 2016 $2.44
 34.1 % $1.82
 23.0 % 

(a) 
ChangesItems are net of tax based on the effective tax rate for each base year, excluding the effect of the adoption of ASU 2016-09 in 2016 and the change in valuation allowance.allowance in 2015.
(b) 
Percentage points ("pp").
(c) Weighted average shares outstanding change primarily due to the vesting of employee restricted stock units,RSUs, the granting of Common Stock to directors, our purchase of vested stockRSUs from employees to pay withholding taxes, and our repurchases of Common Stock. In September, 2015, our Board
(d)
On December 22, 2017, the United States enacted tax reform legislation, the Tax Act, that resulted in significant modifications to existing law. Following guidance in SAB 118, we recorded a provisional discrete net tax benefit resulting from the revaluation of our deferred income taxes in 2017 (Note 6).

Basic and diluted EPS 2017 to 2016 - EPS increased to $2.44 in 2017 from $1.82 in 2016, primarily due to the gain on sale of Directors authorized the purchase of 950,000 shares of our Common Stock in a privately negotiated transaction with F2 SEA Inc., an affiliate of SEACOR Holdings Inc. pursuant to a Stock Repurchase Agreement. On September 1, 2015, we completed this purchase. SEACOR Holdings, Inc. is the 70 percent owner of ICP, our 30 percent equity method investment (see Notes 7(Note 3), the effect on tax expense of the new Tax Act legislation (Note 6), improved performance from operations, and 9).the change in the tax effect of the implementation of ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, partially offset by a decrease in equity method investment earnings (Note 3), a decline in other operating income, net (the 2016 favorable legal settlement agreement and gain on sale of long-lived assets), and an increase in weighted average shares outstanding.

Basic and diluted EPS 2016 to 2015 - EPS increased to $1.82 in 2016 from $1.48 in 2015, primarily due to performance from operations, the change in other operating income, net, (favorable legal settlement agreement and a gain on sale of long-lived assets), the decline in weighted average shares outstanding due to a repurchase of Common Stock in 2015, and tax items, net, (the change in valuation allowance, the implementation of ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, and other changes in effective tax rate) (see Note(Note 6), partially offset by lower equity method investment earnings and an increase in interest expense year-versus-year (Note 3).

Basic and diluted EPS 2015 to 2014 - EPS increased to $1.48 in 2015 from $1.32 in 2014, primarily due to performance from operations, partially offset by an increase in effective tax rate (see Note 6), a decrease in insurance recoveries (see Note 16), and lower equity method investment earnings year-versus-year (see Note 3).

        


DISTILLERY PRODUCTS SEGMENT
DISTILLERY PRODUCTS NET SALESDISTILLERY PRODUCTS NET SALES
Year Ended December 31, Year-versus-Year Net Sales Change Increase/ (Decrease) Year-versus-Year Volume ChangeYear Ended December 31, Year-versus-Year Net Sales Change Increase/ (Decrease) 
Year-versus-Year Volume Change(a)
2016 2015 $ Change % Change % Change2017 2016 $ Change % Change % Change
Amount Amount  Amount Amount  
Premium beverage alcohol$150,364
 $131,347
 $19,017
 14.5 %  $177,998
 $150,364
 $27,634
 18.4 %  
Industrial alcohol77,290
 98,917
 (21,627) (21.9)  76,636
 77,290
 (654) (0.8)  
Food grade alcohol(a)
227,654
 230,264
 (2,610) (1.1)  254,634
 227,654
 26,980
 11.9
  
Fuel grade alcohol(a)
7,372
 7,366
 6
 0.1
  6,368
 7,372
 (1,004) (13.6)  
Distillers feed and related co-products21,780
 26,182
 (4,402) (16.8)  19,332
 21,780
 (2,448) (11.2)  
Warehouse services8,437
 6,413
 2,024
 31.6
  10,674
 8,437
 2,237
 26.5
  
Total distillery products$265,243
 $270,225
 $(4,982) (1.8)% (7.2)%$291,008
 $265,243
 $25,765
 9.7 % 9.2%
                  
(a) Volume change for alcohol products
(a) Volume change for alcohol products
        
(a) Volume change for alcohol products
        
Other Financial Information  Other Financial Information  
Year Ended December 31,Year-versus-Year Increase/(Decrease)  Year Ended December 31,Year-versus-Year Increase/(Decrease)  
2016 2015 Change % Change  2017 2016 Change % Change  
Gross profit$56,836
 $50,662
 $6,174
 12.2 %  $66,817
 $56,836
 $9,981
 17.6 %  
Gross margin %21.4% 18.7% 2.7
pp(b)


  23.0% 21.4% 1.6
pp(b)


  
(b) Percentage points ("pp")

2017 compared to 2016
Driven by strong demand, net sales of higher margin premium beverage alcohol products within food grade alcohol increased 18.4 percent over 2016, while lower margin industrial alcohol product net sales decreased 0.8 percent, resulting in an overall food grade alcohol net sales increase of $26,980, or 11.9 percent. Declines in net sales of distillers feed and related co-products and fuel grade alcohol products were partially offset by an increase in warehouse services revenue, generated by increased storage of customer barrels of whiskey.
Gross profit increased year-versus-year by $9,981, or 17.6 percent. Gross margin for 2017 increased to 23.0 percent from 21.4 percent for 2016. The improvement in gross profit was primarily due to increased sales of higher margin premium beverage alcohol products, a net decline in input costs, and an increase in warehouse services revenue. These gains were partially offset primarily by lower gross profit on distillers feed and related co-products and industrial alcohol.





 DISTILLERY PRODUCTS NET SALES 
 Year Ended December 31, Year-versus-Year Net Sales Change Increase/ (Decrease) 
Year-versus-Year Volume Change(a)
 
 2016 2015 $ Change % Change % Change 
 Amount Amount    
Premium beverage alcohol$150,364
 $131,347
 $19,017
 14.5 %   
Industrial alcohol77,290
 98,917
 (21,627) (21.9)   
   Food grade alcohol(a)
227,654
 230,264
 (2,610) (1.1)   
Fuel grade alcohol(a)
7,372
 7,366
 6
 0.1
   
Distillers feed and related co-products21,780
 26,182
 (4,402) (16.8)   
Warehouse services8,437
 6,413
 2,024
 31.6
   
Total distillery products$265,243
 $270,225
 $(4,982) (1.8)% (7.2)% 
           
(a) Volume change for alcohol products
         
 Other Financial Information   
 Year Ended December 31,Year-versus-Year Increase/(Decrease)   
 2016 2015 Change % Change   
Gross profit$56,836
 $50,662
 $6,174
 12.2 %   
Gross margin %21.4% 18.7% 2.7
pp(b)


   
(b)Percentage points ("pp")


2016 compared to 2015
Driven by strong demand for our premium bourbon and rye whiskeys, net sales of higher margin premium beverage alcohol products within food grade alcohol increased 14.5 percent over 2015, while lower margin industrial alcohol product net sales decreased 21.9 percent, resulting in an overall food grade alcohol net sales decrease of $2,610, or 1.1 percent. A decline in net sales of distillers feed and related co-products was partially offset by an increase in warehouse services revenue, generated by increased storage of customer barrels of whiskey.
Gross profit increased year-versus-year by $6,174, or 12.2 percent. Gross margin for 2016 increased to 21.4 percent from 18.7 percent for 2015, which was primarily due to the continuing shift in sales mix within food grade alcohol from lower margin industrial alcohol products to higher margin premium beverage alcohol products, a decline in input costs, an increase in warehouse services revenue, partially offset by a lower average selling price.




 DISTILLERY PRODUCTS NET SALES 
 Year Ended December 31, Year-versus-Year Net Sales Change Increase/ (Decrease) Year-versus-Year Volume Change 
 2015 2014 $ Change % Change % Change 
 Amount Amount    
Premium beverage alcohol$131,347
 $106,911
 $24,436
 22.9 %   
Industrial alcohol98,917
 101,464
 (2,547) (2.5)   
   Food grade alcohol(a)
230,264
 208,375
 21,889
 10.5
   
Fuel grade alcohol(a)
7,366
 12,987
 (5,621) (43.3)   
Distillers feed and related co-products26,182
 30,361
 (4,179) (13.8)   
 Warehouse services6,413
 4,838
 1,575
 32.6
   
Total distillery products$270,225
 $256,561
 $13,664
 5.3 % (1.5)%
(a) 
           
(a) Volume change for alcohol products         
 Other Financial Information   
 Year Ended December 31,Year-versus-Year Increase/(Decrease)   
 2015 2014 Change % Change   
       
Gross profit$50,662
 $22,332
 $28,330
 126.9 %   
Gross margin %18.7% 8.7% 10.0
pp(b)


   
(b)Percentage points ("pp")


2015 compared to 2014
Total distillery products net sales for 2015 increased $13,664, or 5.3 percent driven by demand for the company's premium beverage alcohol products. Customer demand for premium beverage alcohol products, including bourbon and rye whiskeys, was strong. Net sales of food grade alcohol, which includes these beverage alcohol products, increased by $21,889 compared to 2014, or 10.5 percent. Warehouse revenue generated by increased storage of customer inventory of these products also contributed to the growth. Declines in the lower margin co-products of fuel grade alcohol and distillers feed partially offset this growth.
Gross profit increased year-versus-year by $28,330, or 126.9 percent. Gross margin for 2015 was 18.7 percent compared to 8.7 percent for 2014, which was due to the continuing shift in alcohol product sales mix to premium beverage alcohol products, a higher average selling price, a decrease in the cost of raw materials and energy, and lower production costs. Net sales of higher margin food grade alcohol, which includes beverage alcohol, for 2015, was 85.2 percent of total distillery products net sales, compared to 81.2 percent in 2014.
        


INGREDIENT SOLUTIONS SEGMENT
INGREDIENT SOLUTIONS NET SALESINGREDIENT SOLUTIONS NET SALES
Year Ended December 31, Year-versus-Year Net Sales Change Increase/ (Decrease) Year-versus-Year Volume ChangeYear Ended December 31, Year-versus-Year Net Sales Change Increase/ (Decrease) Year-versus-Year Volume Change
2016 2015 $ Change % Change % Change2017 2016 $ Change % Change % Change
Amount Amount Amount Amount 
Specialty wheat starches$26,803
 $29,989
 $(3,186) (10.6)%  $28,092
 $26,803
 $1,289
 4.8 %  
Specialty wheat proteins18,211
 18,422
 (211) (1.1)  19,458
 18,211
 1,247
 6.8
  
Commodity wheat starch7,002
 7,079
 (77) (1.1)  
Commodity wheat starches8,288
 7,002
 1,286
 18.4
  
Commodity wheat proteins1,004
 1,889
 (885) (46.9)  602
 1,004
 (402) (40.0)  
Total ingredient solutions$53,020

$57,379

$(4,359) (7.6)% (4.0)%$56,440
 $53,020
 $3,420
 6.5 % 13.3%
                  
Other Financial Information  Other Financial Information  
Year Ended December 31, Year-versus-year Increase/Decrease  Year Ended December 31, Year-versus-year Increase/Decrease  
2016 2015 Change % Change  2017 2016 Change % Change  
Gross profit$8,447
 $7,871
 $576
 7.3 %  $9,199
 $8,447
 $752
 8.9 %  
Gross margin %15.9% 13.7% 2.2
pp(a)


  16.3% 15.9% 0.4
pp(a)


  

(a) Percentage points ("pp")

2017 compared to 2016
Total ingredient solutions net sales for 2017 increased by $3,420, or 6.5 percent, compared to 2016. This increase was primarily driven by increased net sales of specialty wheat starches, commodity wheat starches, and specialty wheat proteins, partially offset by decreased net sales of commodity wheat proteins, year-versus-year.
Gross profit increased year-versus-year by $752, or 8.9 percent. Gross margin for 2017 increased to 16.3 percent from 15.9 percent for 2016. The improvement in gross profit was primarily due to a net decline in input costs, partially offset by a lower average selling price.



 INGREDIENT SOLUTIONS NET SALES
 Year Ended December 31, Year-versus-Year Net Sales Change Increase/ (Decrease) Year-versus-Year Volume Change
 2016 2015 $ Change % Change % Change
 Amount Amount   
Specialty wheat starches$26,803
 $29,989
 $(3,186) (10.6)%  
Specialty wheat proteins18,211
 18,422
 (211) (1.1)  
Commodity wheat starches7,002
 7,079
 (77) (1.1)  
Commodity wheat proteins1,004
 1,889
 (885) (46.9)  
Total ingredient solutions$53,020
 $57,379
 $(4,359) (7.6)% (4.0)%
          
 Other Financial Information  
 Year Ended December 31, Year-versus-year Increase/Decrease  
 2016 2015 Change % Change  
Gross profit$8,447
 $7,871
 $576
 7.3 %  
Gross margin %15.9% 13.7% 2.2
pp(a)


  

(a) Percentage points ("pp")


2016 compared to 2015
Total ingredient solutions net sales for 2016 decreased by $4,359, or 7.6 percent, compared to 2015. This decline was driven by a lower average selling price and decreased product net sales volume, due to a continuing challenging price environment for this segment.
Gross profit increased by $576, or 7.3 percent. Gross margin for 2016 was 15.9 percent compared to 13.7 percent for 2015, primarily due to a decline in input costs and improved plant efficiencies, partially offset by a lower average selling price.



 INGREDIENT SOLUTIONS NET SALES
 Year Ended December 31, Year-versus-Year Net Sales Change Increase/ (Decrease) Year-versus-Year Volume Change
 2015 2014 $ Change % Change % Change
 Amount Amount   
Specialty wheat starches$29,989
 $28,217
 $1,772
 6.3 %  
Specialty wheat proteins18,422
 18,618
 (196) (1.1)  
Commodity wheat starch7,079
 7,884
 (805) (10.2)  
Commodity wheat proteins1,889
 2,123
 (234) (11.0)  
Total ingredient solutions$57,379

$56,842

$537
 0.9 % 1.1%
          
 Other Financial Information  
 Year Ended December 31, Year-versus-year Increase/Decrease  
 2015 2014  Change % Change  
      
Gross profit$7,871
 $6,099
 $1,772
 29.1 %  
Gross margin %13.7% 10.7% 3.0
pp(a)


  

(a) Percentage points ("pp")


2015 compared to 2014
Total ingredient solutions net sales for 2015 increased by $537, or 0.9 percent, compared to 2014. This growth was driven by increased product sales volume of 1.1 percent, partially offset by a decrease in average selling price. Net sales of specialty wheat starches increased $1,772 year-versus-year, while net sales of specialty wheat proteins decreased $196 year-versus-year. Commodity wheat starch net sales decreased $805 year-versus-year and commodity wheat protein net sales decreased $234 year-versus-year.
Gross profit increased year-versus-year by $1,772, or 29.1 percent. Gross margin for 2015 was 13.7 percent compared to 10.7 percent for 2014, primarily due to the shift in product sales mix to higher value specialty products, a decrease in the cost of raw materials and energy, and lower production costs. Net sales of higher margin specialty wheat starches and proteins for 2015 increased to 84.4 percent of total ingredient solutions net sales, compared to 82.4 percent in 2014.





        


CASH FLOW, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
We believe our financial condition continues to be of high quality, as evidenced by our ability to generate adequate cash from operations while having ready access to capital at competitive rates.
Operating cash flow and debt through our Credit Agreement (seeand Note 5 for CreditPurchase Agreement details)(Note 5) provide the primary sources of cash to fund operating needs and capital expenditures. These same sources of cash are used to fund shareholder dividends and other discretionary uses such as share repurchases.uses. Going forward, we expect to use cash to implement our invest to grow strategy, particularly in the distillery products segment. The overall liquidity of the Company reflects our strong business results and an effective cash management strategy that takes into account liquidity management, economic factors, and tax considerations. We expect our sources of cash, including our Credit Agreement and Note Purchase Agreement, to be adequate to provide for budgeted capital expenditures and anticipated operating requirements.

Operating Cash Flow
2017 compared to 2016

Cash flow from operations increased $13,750 to $33,471 for 2017, from $19,721 for 2016. This increase in operating cash flow was primarily the result of net cash inflows related to the increases in accounts payable, inventory, net income, after giving effect to adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities (depreciation and amortization, gain on sale of equity method investment, gain on property insurance recoveries, gain on sale of assets, share-based compensation, equity method investment (earnings) loss, distribution received from equity method investee, deferred income taxes, including change in valuation allowance, and other, net), refundable income taxes, and accrued expenses, partially offset by the decreases in receivables, net, and accounts payable to affiliate, net.

Increases to Operating Cash Flow - Accounts payable and accounts payable to affiliate, net, increased $6,191 for 2017 compared to a decrease of $2,120 for 2016. The $8,311 change was primarily due to the timing of cash disbursements related to operating expenses associated with the increased net sales in December 2017 compared to December 2016. The Accounts payable to affiliate, net, decreased to zero when we sold our equity method investment in ICP on July 3, 2017 (Note 3). Inventory increased $14,291 for 2017 compared to an increase of $20,106 for 2016. The resulting $5,815 change was due to inventory categories remaining flat or decreasing in 2017, except barreled distillate inventory for aging, which increased $14,785. Net income, after giving effect to adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities, increased by $4,762, to $48,444 for 2017 from $43,682 for 2016. Refundable income taxes decreased $725 for 2017 compared to an increase of $3,390 in 2016. The $4,115 change was primarily due to the use of certain tax attributes, including net operating losses and the timing of estimated tax payments. Accrued expenses increased $2,278 for 2017 compared to a decrease of $1,407 for 2016. The $3,685 change was primarily due to increases in incentive compensation and personnel costs.

Decreases to Operating Cash Flow- Receivables, net, increased $8,262 for 2017 compared to an decrease of $4,585 for 2016. The resulting $12,847 change was primarily due to higher net sales in December 2017 compared to December 2016.

2016 compared to 2015

Cash flow from operations increased $1,059 to $19,721 for 2016, from $18,662 for 2015. This increase in operating cash flow was primarily the result of net cash inflows related to increased net income, after giving effect to adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities (depreciation and amortization, gain on property insurance recoveries, gain on sale of assets, share-based compensation, equity method investment earnings, distribution received from equity method investee, and deferred income taxes, including change in valuation allowance) changes in receivables, net, inventory, and accounts payable to affiliate, net, partially offset by the change in refundable income taxes, accounts payable, and accrued expenses.



Increases to Operating Cash Flow - Net income, after giving effect to adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities, increased by $7,995, to $43,682 for 2016 from $35,687 for 2015. Improvements in the gross profit of the distillery products and ingredient solutions segments and the other operating income, net, items in 2016, as well as a distribution received from our equity method investee of $3,300, a decrease in equity method investment earnings of $2,066, a decrease in depreciation and amortization of $1,129, an increase in share-based compensation of $988, a gain on sale of assets of $872, and a decrease in deferred income taxes, including change in valuation allowance of $668, were the major factors that generated this net income increase. Inventory increased $20,106 for 2016, compared to an increase of $24,260 for 2015. The resulting $4,154 change was due to inventory decreases in 2016 across all categories, except barreled distillate inventory for aging, which increased. Receivables, net, decreased $4,585 for 2016 compared to ana decrease of $2,002 for 2015. The resulting $2,583 change was primarily due to lower net sales in December 2016 compared to December 2015. Accounts payable to affiliate increased $1,058 for 2016 compared to a decrease of $1,042 for 2015. The resulting $2,100 change was primarily due to the timing of invoices.

Decreases to Operating Cash Flow - Accounts payable decreased $3,178 for 2016 compared to an increase of $3,653 for 2015. The $6,831 change was primarily due to the timing of cash disbursements related to operating expenses and capital expenditures. Accrued expenses decreased $1,407 for 2016 compared to an increase of $2,351 for 2015. The $3,758 change was primarily due to decreases in incentive compensation and severance accruals. Refundable income taxes increased $3,390 for 2016 compared to a decrease of $1,073 in 2015. The $4,463 change was primarily due to tax credits that were earned after estimated payments had been made.
2015 compared to 2014

Cash flow from operations increased $2,850 to $18,662 for 2015, from $15,812 for 2014. This increase in operating cash flow was primarily the result of net cash inflows related to increased net income, after giving effect to adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities (depreciation and amortization, gain on property insurance recoveries, loss on sale of assets, share-based compensation, excess tax benefits, equity method investment earnings, distribution received from equity method investee, and deferred income taxes, including change in valuation allowance), changes in accounts payable, accounts receivable, net, and accrued expenses, partially offset by the change in inventory.



Increases to Operating Cash Flow - Net income increased, after giving effect to adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities, by $10,278, from $25,409 for 2014 to $35,687 for 2015. Improvements in the gross profit of the distillery products and ingredient solutions segments, a decrease in gain on insurance recoveries of $8,290, and a decrease in equity method investment earnings of $4,035, net of a $4,835 cash dividend distribution from ICP in 2014, were the major factors that generated this net income increase. Accounts payable increased $3,653 for 2015 compared to a decrease of $5,928 for 2014. The $9,581 change was primarily due to the year-ago settlement of expenses related to the proxy contest and the timing of current cash disbursements. Receivables, net, decreased $2,002 for 2015 compared to an increase of $4,851 for 2014. The resulting $6,853 change was primarily due to the timing of collections. Accrued expenses increased $2,351 for 2015 compared to a decrease of $373 for 2014. The $2,724 change was primarily due to increases in incentive compensation and severance.

Decreases to Operating Cash Flow - Inventory increased $24,260 for 2015, compared to a reduction of $476 for 2014, resulting in a $24,736 change. Investment in barreled distillate inventory for aging of $17,164 and increased finished product safety stock of $5,087 accounted for the majority of the inventory increase.

Investing Cash Flow
2017 compared to 2016

Net cash flow provided by investing activities for 2017 was $1,777 compared to net cash flow used in investing activities of $17,683 for 2016, for a net increase of $19,460. This net increase was primarily due to the sale of our 30 percent equity method investment in ICP during 2017, which resulted in a return of equity method investment of $22,832 (Note 3), as well as the decrease in cash used for the acquisition of George Remus® year-versus-year of $1,551. The net increase in cash provided by investing activities was partially offset by an increase in additions to property, plant, and equipment year-versus-year of $3,133, as well as a decrease in proceeds from the sale of property and other and the return of our DMI joint venture investment year-versus-year of $1,560. The increase in additions to property, plant, and equipment was primarily due to an increase in capital expenditures related to the warehouse expansion program.
2016 compared to 2015

Net cash flow used in investing activities for 2016 was $17,683 compared to net investing cash flow used in investing activities of $30,526 for 2015, for a net decrease in cash used in investing activities of $12,843. During 2016, our additions to property, plant, and equipment were $12,604 less than the prior year, primarily due to a decrease in capital expenditures related to the new dryer installed at the Lawrenceburg facility and a decrease in capital expenditures related to the Lawrenceburg facility warehouse expansion program. We received proceeds from the sale of property and the return of our DMI joint venture investment in 2016 of $1,560. These receipts of cash from investing activities were partially offset by our acquisition in November 2016 of the George Remus®Remus® brand business from Queen City Whiskey LLC for cash consideration of $1,551.

2015Capital Spending.
2017 compared to 2014

Net investing cash outflow for 2015 was $30,526 compared to net investing cash inflow of $1,502 for 2014, for a net increase in cash used in investing activities of $32,028. During 2015, we made capital investments of $23,573 more than the prior year period primarily due to capital expenditures related to the dryer damaged at the Lawrenceburg facility in the January 2014 fire and capital expenditures related to the Lawrenceburg facility warehouse expansion program. For 2014, we had net proceeds from property insurance recoveries of $8,450 and zero for 2015.

Capital Spending.2016

We manage capital spending to support our business growth plans. Investments in property, plant, property and equipment were $17,922$21,055 and $30,526,$17,922, respectively, for 20162017 and 2015.2016. Adjusted for the change in capital expenditures remaining in accounts payable for 2017 and 2016 of $158 and 2015 of $2,580, and $1,210, respectively, total capital expenditures were $20,502$21,213 and $31,736,$20,502, respectively. We expect approximately $22,000 in capital expenditures in 20172018 for facility improvement and expansion (including warehouse expansion), facility sustaining projects, and environmental health and safety projects.

In 2015, ourOur Board of Directors approved a $20,200 major expansion in warehousing capacity on a twenty acre campus adjoining our current Lawrenceburg facility as part of the implementation of our five year strategic plan to support the growth ofgrow the whiskey category. In September 2016 an additional $8,800 wasThe approved related toinvestments for the next phases of this project. Theproject total approved warehouse expansion investment at December 31, 2016, is $29,000.approximately $33,800. As of December 31, 2016,2017, we had incurred $20,077approximately $26,000 of this approved investment amount.



Financing Cash Flow
Dividends and Dividend Equivalents. We made dividend and dividend equivalent payments of $17,380, $2,066, and $1,087 for 2017, 2016, and $907 for 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively, to our holders of Common Stock, Restricted Stock, and RSUs.RSUs as detailed below.
Dividend and Dividend Equivalent Information (per Share and Unit) 
Declaration date Payment date Declared Paid Total payment 
2017         
February 15, 2017 March 24, 2017 $0.04
 $0.04
 $688
 
May 2, 2017 June 9, 2017 0.04
 0.04
 688
 
August 1, 2017 September 8, 2017 0.85
 0.85
 14,628
(a) 
August 1, 2017 September 11, 2017 0.04
 0.04
 688
 
October 31, 2017 December 8, 2017 0.04
 0.04
 688
 
    $1.01
 $1.01
 $17,380
 
2016         
March 7, 2016 April 14, 2016 $0.08
 $0.08
 $1,378
 
August 1, 2016 September 8, 2016 0.02
 0.02
 344
 
October 31, 2016 December 8, 2016 0.02
 0.02
 344
 
    $0.12
 $0.12
 $2,066
 
2015         
February 27, 2015 April 21, 2015 $0.06
 $0.06
 $1,087
 


(a)
This was a special dividend related to the sale of our 30 percent interest in ICP to Pacific Ethanol. The transaction was completed onJuly 3, 2017.
Treasury Purchases. WeUpon their vesting, we purchased shares of stockRSUs during 2016, primarily2017 from employees to cover associated withholding taxes. Total treasury stock purchases added 74,132 shares, or $4,663 to our treasury stock in 2017.
We purchased restricted stock during 2016 from employees to cover associated withholding taxes on the vestingvestings of restricted stock.share-based awards. Total treasury stock purchases added 40,870 shares, or $1,518 to our treasury stock in 2016.
We purchased 1,010,135 treasury shares in 2015 for a total of $15,408. Of the purchased shares, 950,000 were from a privately negotiated transaction with an affiliate of SEACOR Holdings, Inc. on September 1, 2015, for a total settlement of $14,488. SEACOR Holdings, Inc. iswas the 70 percent owner of ICP, our 30 percent equity method investment.investment until they were sold to Pacific Ethanol on July 3, 2017. Additional purchases of treasury stock in 2015 were primarily from employees to cover withholding taxes on the vesting of restricted stock and totaledRSUs totaling 60,135 shares of stock, or $920.
We also purchased shares of stock during 2014, primarily to cover withholding taxes on the vesting of employee restricted stock. Total treasury stock purchases added 92,465 shares, or $672, to our treasury stock in 2014.
Long-Term and Short-Term Debt. We maintain debt levels we consider appropriate after evaluating a number of factors, including cash flow expectations, cash requirements for ongoing operations, investment and financing plans (including brand development and share repurchase activities) and the overall cost of capital. Total debt was $36,001$24,554 (net of unamortized loan fees of $710) at December 31, 20162017 and $33,460$36,001 (net of unamortized loan fees of $576) at December 31, 2015.2016. During 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014,2015, we had net borrowings / (payments) of $4,828, $22,754, and $(11,330) on our Credit Agreement. Our paymentsAgreement of $(30,955), $4,828, and $22,754. During 2017, 2016, and 2015, we had net borrowings / (payments) on our long-term debt totaled $2,346, $1,641,of $19,642, $(2,346), and $1,555 for 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.$1,059 (Note 5).


Financial Condition and Liquidity
Our principal uses of cash in the ordinary course of business are for input costs used in our production processes, salaries, capital expenditures, and investments supporting our strategic plan, such as the aging of barreled distillate.  Generally, during periods when commodities prices are rising, our operations require increased use of cash to support inventory levels.  
Our principal sources of cash are product sales and borrowing on our Credit Agreement and Note Purchase Agreement.  Under our Credit Agreement and Note Purchase Agreement, we must meet certain financial covenants and include other restrictions, as disclosed in Note 5.and at December 31, 2017, we met those covenants and restrictions.


At December 31, 2016,2017, our current assets exceeded our current liabilities by $73,906,$93,162, largely due to our inventories of $78,858.$93,149. At December 31, 20162017 our cash balance was $1,569$3,084 and we have used our Credit Agreement and Note Purchase Agreement for liquidity purposes, with $51,588$146,702 remaining for additional borrowings at December 31, 2016.borrowings. We anticipate being able to support our short-term liquidity and operating needs largely through cash generated from operations. We regularly assesses our cash needs and the available sources to fund these needs. We utilize short-term and long-term debt to fund discretionary items, such as capital investments and share repurchases. In addition, we have strong operating results such that financial institutions if needed, should provide sufficient credit funding to meet short-term financing requirements.requirements, if needed.
 
OFF BALANCE SHEET OBLIGATIONS
Guarantees and Other Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

Arrangement with Cargill.  We have entered a business alliance with Cargill, Incorporated for the production and marketing of a resistant starch derived from tapioca (U.S. Patent #5,855,946).Our arrangement with Cargill expires in June 2017. We sold only an insignificant amount of the product in 2016, and the agreement with Cargill does not appear to be significant at this time.  If we terminate the arrangement before the expiration of 18 months following certain force majeure events affecting Cargill, or if Cargill terminates the arrangement because of a breach by us of our obligations, we will be required to pay a portion (up to 50 percent) of the book value of capital expenditures, if any, made by Cargill to enable it to produce the product. This amount will not exceed $2,500 without our consent. Upon the occurrence of any such event, we will also be required to give Cargill a non-exclusive sublicense to use the patented process for the life of the patent in the production of high amylose corn based starches for use in food products. The sublicense would be royalty bearing, provided we were not also then making the high amylose corn based starch.

Indemnification Arrangement with ICP and ICP Holdings.  Our Contribution Agreement with ICP and the LLC Interest Purchase Agreement with ICP Holdings require us to indemnify ICP and ICP Holdings until the end of the applicable statute of limitations from and against any damages or liabilities arising from a breach of certain environmental and tax representations and warranties in the Contribution Agreement and the LLC Interest Purchase Agreement and also with respect to certain environmental damages or liabilities related to the recommencement of production at the Pekin facility or to operations at the Pekin facility prior to November 20, 2009.



Operating Leases. We lease railcars and other assets under various operating leases.  For railcar leases, we are generally required to pay all service costs associated with the railcars.  Rental payments include minimum rentals plus contingent amounts based on mileage.  Rental expenses under railcar operating leases with terms longer than one month were $2,372, $2,561, and $2,283 for 2017, 2016, and $2,241 for 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. Annual rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases total $8,707$9,977 for the next five years ending December 31, 20212022 and an additional $993$390 thereafter.
    
Contractual Obligations

The following table provides information on the amounts and payments of our contractual obligations at December 31, 2016:

2017:
Payments due by periodPayments due by period
Total Less than 1 year 1-3 years 4-5 years More than 5 yearsTotal 2018 2019-2020 2021-2022 After 2022
Long term debt$2,324
 $358
 $758
 $816
 $392
$25,264
 $372
 $786
 $8,906
 $15,200
Interest on Long term debt267
 80
 119
 61
 7
4,953
 773
 1,503
 1,336
 1,341
Operating leases9,700
 3,397
 2,936
 2,374
 993
10,367
 3,677
 4,032
 2,268
 390
Post-employment benefit plan obligations3,948
 502
 1,024
 957
 1,465
3,439
 471
 936
 841
 1,191
Purchase commitments80,274
 76,380
(a) 
3,634
 260
 
93,809
 89,382
(a) 
4,143
 283
 1
Total$96,513
 $80,717
 $8,471
 $4,468
 $2,857
$137,832
 $94,675
 $11,400
 $13,634
 $18,123
    
(a) Includes open purchase order commitments related to raw materials and packaging used in the ordinary course of business of $73,334.$82,755.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
In preparing consolidated financial statements, management must make estimates and judgments that affect the carrying values of our assets and liabilities as well as recognition of revenue and expenses.  Management’s estimates and judgments are based on our historical experience and management’s knowledge and understanding of current facts and circumstances.  The policies discussed below are considered by management to be critical to an understanding of our consolidated financial statements.  The application of certain of these policies places significant demands on management’s judgment, with financial reporting results relying on estimations about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain.  For all of these policies, management cautions that future events rarely develop as forecast and estimates routinely require adjustment and may require material adjustment.
Revenue Recognition. Except as discussed below, revenue from the sale of our products is recognized as products are delivered to customers according to shipping terms and when title and risk of loss have transferred.  Income from various government incentive grant programs is recognized as it is earned. We do not offer a right of return but will accept returns if we shipped the wrong product or wrong quantity.
Our distillery segment routinely produces unaged distillate and this product is frequently barreled and warehoused at a Company location for an extended period of time in accordance with directions received from our customers.  This product must meet customer acceptance specifications (if applicable), the risks of ownership and title for these goods must be passed, and requirements for bill and hold revenue recognition must be met prior to us recognizing revenue for this product.  Separate warehousing agreements are maintained for customers who store their product with us, and warehouse service revenues are recognized as the service is provided.

Recognition of Insurance Recoveries. Estimated loss contingencies are recognized as charges to income when they are probable and reasonably estimable.  Insurance recoveries are not recognized until all contingencies related to the insurance claim have been resolved and settlement has been reached with the insurer.  Insurance recoveries, to the extent of costs and losses, are reported as a reduction to Cost of sales on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Insurance recoveries, in excess of costs and losses, if any, are included as a reduction to Cost of sales on the Consolidated Statements of Income for business interruption recoveries and in Insurance recoveries on the Consolidated Statements of Income for property damage recoveries. Insurance recoveries, in excess of costs and losses, if any, are included as an operating activity on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for business interruption recoveries and as an investing activity on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for property damage recoveries.For a detail of the activity and related accounting treatment, see Note 16.



Inventory. Inventory includes finished goods, raw materials in the form of agricultural commodities used in the production process, and certain maintenance and repair items.  Whiskey is typically aged in barrels for several years, following industry practice; we classify all barreled whiskey as a current asset. We include insurance, and other carrying charges applicable to barreled whiskey in inventory costs.

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market on the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method.  Inventory valuations are impacted by constantly changing prices paid for key materials, primarily corn. We assess the valuation of our inventories and reduce the carrying value of those inventories that are obsolete or in excess of our forecasted usage to their estimated net realizable value. We estimate the net realizable value of such inventories based on analyses and assumptions including, but not limited to, historical usage, future demand, and market requirements. Reductions to the carrying value of inventories are recorded in cost of product sold. If the future demand for our products is less favorable than our forecasts, then the value of the inventories may be required to be reduced, which could result in material additional expense to the Company and have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Impairment of Assets.

Impairment of Investments

We review our investments in equity method investments for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investments may not be fully recoverable. Evidence of a loss in value that is other than temporary include, but are not limited to, the absence of an ability to recover the carrying amount of the investment, the inability of the investee to sustain an earnings capacity which would justify the carrying amount of the investment, or, where applicable, estimated sales proceeds which are insufficient to recover the carrying amount of the investment. If the fair value of the investment is determined to be less than the carrying value and the decline in value is considered to be other than temporary, an appropriate write down is recorded based on the excess of the carrying value over the best estimate of fair value of the investment.  Considerable judgment is used in these measurements, and a change in the assumptions could result in a different determination of impairment loss and/or the amount of any impairment. No other than temporary impairments were recorded for 2016 and 2015 related to our equity method investments.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We review long-lived assets, mainly buildings and equipment assets, for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that usage may be limited and carrying values may not be fully recoverable.

In making an assessment to whether the carrying values are fully recoverable, management must make estimates and judgments relating to anticipated revenues and expenses and values of our assets and liabilities.  Management’s estimates and judgments are based on our historical experience and management’s knowledge and understanding of current facts and circumstances.  Management derives data for estimates from both outside appraisals and internal sources, and considers such matters as product mix, unit sales, unit prices, input costs, expected target volume levels in supply contracts and expectations about new customers as well as overall market trends. Should events indicate the assets cannot be used as planned, the realization from alternative uses or disposal is compared to the carrying value.  Considerable judgment is used in these measurements, and a change in the assumptions could result in a different determination of impairment loss and/or the amount of any impairment. No events or conditions occurred in 2016 and 2015 that required us to record an impairment.

Income Taxes. We account for deferred income tax assets and liabilities resulting from the effects of transactions reported in different periods for financial reporting and income tax under the liability method of accounting for income taxes. This method gives consideration to the future tax consequences of the deferred income tax items and immediately recognizes changes in income tax laws upon enactment as well as applied income tax rates when facts and circumstances warrant such changes. We establish a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset may not be realized. Accounting for uncertainty in income tax positions requires management judgment and the use of estimates in determining whether the impact of a tax position is "more likely than not" of being sustained on audit by the relevant taxing authority. We consider many factors when evaluating and estimating our tax positions, which may require periodic adjustment and which may not accurately anticipate actual outcomes.



During 2015, we evaluated the potential realization of our deferred income tax assets. We have demonstrated increased and sustained income from operations supporting the execution of our strategic plan and our analysis was significantly influenced by recent improvements in pretax income, as well as projections of future taxable income. As of December 31, 2015, based on our projections of future taxable income and in consideration of all other evidence available (both positive and negative), we determined that it was more likely than not that we would realize a significant portion of our deferred tax assets related to certain state income tax benefits that had been reduced by a valuation allowance. Therefore, we reduced our valuation allowance for deferred tax assets during 2015 by an $2,385. We continued to maintain a valuation allowance of $1,444 as of December 31, 2015 related to capital loss carryforwards that, in our estimate, was not more likely than not to be realized prior to their respective carryforward periods.

During 2016, we evaluated the potential realization of our deferred income tax assets, considering both positive and negative evidence, including cumulative income or loss for the past three years and forecasted taxable income. Approximately $689 of capital loss carryovers expired unused at the end of 2016. The related deferred tax asset and associated valuation allowance were eliminated as of December 31, 2016. The remainder of the change in the valuation allowance was $10 for additional state net operating loss carryforwards, and $39 for capital losses that were utilized in 2016, for a total reduction in the valuation allowance of $718. Our valuation allowance of $726 as of December 31, 2016, largely relates to capital loss carryforwards that, in our estimate, are not more likely than not to be realized prior to their respective carryforward periods, due to our past history and forecasted ability of not generating enough capital gains to use such losses (see Note 6).

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
 
For information with respect to recent accounting pronouncements and the impact of these pronouncements on our consolidated financial statements, see Note 1.



ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
We are exposed to commodity price and interest rate market risks. We monitor and manage these exposures as part of our overall risk management program. Our risk management program focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to reduce the potentially adverse effects that the volatility of these markets may have on our operating results.

Commodity Costs

Certain commodities we use in our production process, are exposedor input costs, expose us to market price risk due to volatility in the prices for those commodities.  OurThrough our grain supply agreementscontracts for our Atchison and Lawrenceburg facilities, our wheat flour supply contract for our Atchison facility, and Atchisonour natural gas contracts for both facilities, permit us towe purchase grain, wheat flour, and natural gas, respectively, for delivery upfrom one to 1224 months into the future at negotiated prices.  The pricing for contracts is based on a formula using several factors.  We have determined that the firm commitments to purchase grain, wheat flour, and natural gas under the terms of theour supply agreementscontracts meet the normal purchases and sales exception as defined under Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 815,  Derivatives and Hedging, and have excluded the fair value of these commitments from recognition within our consolidated financial statements until the actual contracts are physically settled.

Our production process also involves the use of wheat flour and natural gas. The contracts for wheat flour and natural gas range from monthly contracts to multi-year supply arrangements; however, because the quantities involved have always beenare for amounts to be consumed within the normal expected production process, we have determined that the contracts meet the criteria for the normal purchases and sales exception and have excluded the fair value of these commitments from recognition within our consolidated financial statements until the actual contracts are physically settled. For a discussion of our direct material purchase commitments, see Note 8.process.

Interest Rate Exposures

Our Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, as amended March 21, 2016, provides forand Note Purchase Agreement (Note 5) expose us to market risks arising from adverse changes in interest either on a Base Rate model or a LIBOR Rate model. For LIBOR Rate Loans,rates. Established procedures and internal processes govern the interest rate is equal to the per annum LIBOR Rate (based on 1, 2, 3 or 6 months) plus 1.75 - 2.75 percent (depending on the Average Excess Availability). For Base Rate Loans, the interest rate is the greatestmanagement of (a) 1 percent per annum, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus one half percent, (c) the one month LIBOR Rate plus 1 percent, and (d) Wells Fargo’s "prime rate" as announced from time to time, plus 0.75 - 1.75 percent (depending on the Average Excess Availability). The default rate is equal to 2 percentage points above the per annum rate otherwise applicable, in the lender’s discretion.this market risk.

Increases in market interest rates would cause interest expense to increase and earnings before income taxes to decrease. The change in interest expense and earnings before income taxes would be dependent upon the weighted average outstanding borrowings during the reporting period following an increase in market interest rates. Based on weighted average outstanding variable-rate borrowings at December 31, 2016,2017, a 100 basis point increase over the non-default rates actually in effect at such date would increase our interest expense on an annualized basis by $412.$362. Based on weighted average outstanding fixed-rate borrowings at December 31, 2017, a 100 basis point increase in market rates would result in a decrease in the fair value of our outstanding fixed-rate debt of $1,147, and a 100 basis point decrease in market rates would result in an increase in the fair value of our outstanding fixed-rate debt of $1,231.


        


ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
 
The management of MGP Ingredients, Inc. (the "Company")  is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f).  Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.  Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.

In May 2013, the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations ("COSO") issued its Internal Control - Integrated Framework (the "2013 Framework"). While the 2013 Framework's internal control components are the same as those in the framework and criteria established in the "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued by COSO in 1992 (the "1992 Framework"), the new framework requires companies to assess whether 17 principles are present and functioning in determining whether their system of internal control is effective.
 
With the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the 2013 Framework. As a result of this assessment, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20162017 was effective.

KPMG, LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Company's financial statements contained herein, has issued an attestationaudit report on the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.2017. The combined report on the consolidated financial statements of MGP Ingredients, Inc. and subsidiaries and attestationaudit report as to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting is included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

        


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
TheTo the Stockholders and Board of Directors and Stockholders
MGP Ingredients, Inc.:

Opinions on the Consolidated Financial Statements and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of MGP Ingredients, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20162017 and 2015, and2016, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows, and changes in stockholders’ equity, for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016.2017, and the related notes (collectively, the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited MGP Ingredients, Inc.’sthe Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). MGP Ingredients, Inc.’sCommission.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Basis for Opinions
The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements and an opinion on MGP Ingredients, Inc.’sthe Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, andas well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk.
Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MGP Ingredients, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, MGP Ingredients, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
/s/ KPMG LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2008.
Kansas City, Missouri
March 8, 20171, 2018



        


MGP INGREDIENTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
 

Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Sales$328,081
 $345,887
 $338,352
$358,132
 $328,081
 $345,887
Less: excise taxes9,818
 18,283
 24,949
10,684
 9,818
 18,283
Net sales318,263
 327,604
 313,403
347,448
 318,263
 327,604
Cost of sales (a)
252,980
 269,071
 284,972
271,432
 252,980
 269,071
Gross profit65,283
 58,533
 28,431
76,016
 65,283
 58,533
          
Selling, general and administrative expenses26,693
 25,683
 20,101
Insurance recoveries (Note 16)
 
 (8,290)
Other operating (income) costs, net(3,385) 
 1
Selling, general, and administrative ("SG&A") expenses33,107
 26,693
 25,683
Other operating income, net
 (3,385) 
Operating income41,975
32,850
32,850
 16,619
42,909
32,850
41,975
 32,850
          
Equity method investment earnings (Note 3)4,036
 6,102
 10,137
Gain on sale of equity method investment (Note 3)11,381
 
 
Equity method investment earnings (loss) (Note 3)(348) 4,036
 6,102
Interest expense, net(1,294) (534) (816)(1,184) (1,294) (534)
Income before income taxes44,717
38,418
38,418
 25,940
52,758
38,418
44,717
 38,418
          
Income tax expense (Note 6)13,533
 12,227
 2,265
10,935
 13,533
 12,227
Net income31,184
26,191
26,191
 23,675
41,823
26,191
31,184
 26,191

    

    

Income attributable to participating securities954
 873
 832
996
 954
 873
Net income attributable to common shareholders and used in earnings per share calculation (Note 6)$30,230
 $25,318
 $22,843
Net income attributable to common shareholders and used in Earnings Per Share ("EPS") calculation (Note 7)$40,827
 $30,230
 $25,318

    

    

Share information    

    

Diluted weighted average common shares16,643,811
 17,123,556
 17,305,866
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares16,746,731
 16,643,811
 17,123,556
          
Basic and diluted EPS$1.82
 $1.48
 $1.32
$2.44
 $1.82
 $1.48

    

    

Dividends and dividend equivalents per common share$0.12
 $0.06
 $0.05
$1.01
 $0.12
 $0.06
 

(a) 
Includes related party purchases of $18,425, and $29,596, and $40,206 $37,007 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014,2015, respectively.













See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
        


MGP INGREDIENTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Dollars in thousands)

Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Net income$31,184
 $26,191
 $23,675
$41,823
 $31,184
 $26,191
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:    

    

Company sponsored benefit plans:    

    

Change in pension plans, net of tax expense (benefit) of $0, $160, and $(155), respectively
 244
 133
Change in post-employment benefits, net of tax expense (benefit) of $90, ($41), and ($6), respectively134
 (54) (846)
Change in translation adjustment and post-employment benefits of equity method investments, net of tax benefit of $6, $36, and $37, respectively(7) 42
 (15)
Other comprehensive income (loss)127

232
 (728)
Change in pension plans, net of tax expense, of $0, $0, and $160, respectively
 
 244
Change in post-employment benefits, net of tax expense (benefit) of $40, $90, and ($41), respectively66
 134
 (54)
Other, net of tax(4) (7) 42
Other comprehensive income62

127
 232
Comprehensive income$31,311

$26,423
 $22,947
$41,885

$31,311
 $26,423






































See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
        


MGP INGREDIENTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except par value)

        
December 31,December 31,
2016 20152017 2016
Current Assets
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents$1,569
 $747
$3,084
 $1,569
Receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts: December 31, 2016, and 2015 - $24)26,085
 30,670
Receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2017 and 2016 - $24)34,347
 26,085
Inventory78,858
 58,701
93,149
 78,858
Prepaid expenses1,684
 1,062
2,182
 1,684
Refundable income taxes2,705
 
1,980
 2,705
Total current assets110,901
 91,180
134,742
 110,901
      
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization92,791
 83,554
Property, plant, and equipment, net103,051
 92,791
Equity method investments18,934
 18,563

 18,934
Other assets2,710
 1,013
2,535
 2,710
Total assets$225,336
 $194,310
$240,328
 $225,336
      
Current Liabilities      
Current maturities of long-term debt$4,359
 $3,345
$372
 $4,359
Accounts payable20,342
 20,940
30,037
 20,342
Accounts payable to affiliate, net3,349
 2,291

 3,349
Accrued expenses8,945
 10,400
11,171
 8,945
Income taxes payable
 685
Total current liabilities36,995
 37,661
41,580
 36,995
      
Long-term debt, less current maturities16,218
 7,579
21,407
 16,218
Revolving credit facility15,424
 22,536
2,775
 15,424
Deferred credits2,978
 3,402
2,151
 2,978
Accrued retirement health and life insurance benefits3,604
 4,136
Accrued retirement, health, and life insurance benefits3,133
 3,604
Other non current liabilities393
 79
540
 393
Deferred income taxes3,432
 2,757
12
 3,432
Total liabilities79,044
 78,150
71,598
 79,044
      
Commitments and Contingencies – See Notes 4 and 7

 

Commitments and Contingencies – Note 8

 

Stockholders’ Equity      
Capital stock      
Preferred, 5% non-cumulative; $10 par value; authorized 1,000 shares; issued and outstanding 437 shares4
 4
4
 4
Common stock      
No par value; authorized 40,000,000 shares; issued 18,115,965 shares at December 31, 2016 and 2015; 16,658,765 and 16,681,576 shares outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively6,715
 6,715
No par value; authorized 40,000,000 shares; issued 18,115,965 shares at December 31, 2017 and 2016; 16,797,420 and 16,658,765 shares outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively6,715
 6,715
Additional paid-in capital14,279
 12,383
13,912
 14,279
Retained earnings142,652
 113,531
167,129
 142,652
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(373) (500)(311) (373)
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,457,200 and 1,434,389 shares at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively(16,985) (15,973)
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,318,545 and 1,457,200 shares at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively(18,719) (16,985)
Total stockholders’ equity146,292
 116,160
168,730
 146,292
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$225,336
 $194,310
$240,328
 $225,336






 See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
        


MGPINGREDIENTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)

    
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31, 
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities           
Net income$31,184
 $26,191
 $23,675
$41,823
 $31,184
 $26,191
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:           
Depreciation and amortization11,253
 12,382
 12,325
11,308
 11,253
 12,382
 
Gain on sale of equity method investment(11,381) 
 
 
Gain on property insurance recoveries(230) 
 (8,290)
 (230) 
 
Loss (gain) on sale of assets(872) 
 38
Gain on sale of assets
 (872) 
 
Share-based compensation2,402
 1,414
 930
2,574
 2,402
 1,414
 
Excess tax benefits
 453
 463
Equity method investment earnings(4,036) (6,102) (10,137)
Equity method investment (earnings) loss348
 (4,036) (6,102) 
Distribution received from equity method investee3,300
 
 4,835
7,131
 3,300
 
 
Deferred income taxes, including change in valuation allowance681
 1,349
 1,570
(3,420) 681
 1,349
 
Other, net61
 
 453
 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:    

      
Receivables, net4,585
 2,002
 (4,851)(8,262) 4,585
 2,002
 
Inventory, net of assets acquired in acquisition(20,106) (24,260) 476
Inventory(14,291) (20,106) (24,260) 
Prepaid expenses(622) 117
 (331)(498) (622) 117
 
Refundable income taxes(3,390) 1,073
 78
725
 (3,390) 1,073
 
Accounts payable(3,178) 3,653
 (5,928)9,540
 (3,178) 3,653
 
Accounts payable to affiliate, net1,058
 (1,042) 2,129
(3,349) 1,058
 (1,042) 
Accrued expenses(1,407) 2,351
 (373)2,278
 (1,407) 2,351
 
Deferred credits(424) (697) 174
(827) (424) (697) 
Accrued retirement health and life insurance benefits(477) (703) (699)
Accrued retirement, health, and life insurance benefits(289) (477) (703) 
Other, net
 481
 (272)
 
 481
 
Net cash provided by operating activities19,721
 18,662
 15,812
33,471
 19,721
 18,662
 
           
Cash Flows from Investing Activities           
Additions to property and equipment(17,922) (30,526) (6,953)
Additions to property, plant, and equipment(21,055) (17,922) (30,526) 
Divestiture of equity method investment, net22,832
 351
 
 
Proceeds from property insurance recoveries230
 
 8,450

 230
 
 
Proceeds from sale of property and other1,209
 
 5

 1,209
 
 
Acquisition of George Remus®(1,551) 
 
Divestiture of DMI351
 
 
Acquisition of George Remus®

 (1,551) 
 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(17,683) (30,526) 1,502
1,777
 (17,683) (30,526) 
           
Cash Flows from Financing Activities           
Payment of dividends(2,066) (1,087) (907)(17,380) (2,066) (1,087) 
Purchase of treasury stock(1,518) (15,408) (672)(4,663) (1,518) (15,408) 
Loan fees incurred with borrowings(114) (348) (66)(377) (114) (348) 
Principal payments on long-term debt(2,346) (1,641) (1,555)(358) (2,346) (1,641) 
Proceeds on long-term debt
 2,700
 
20,000
 
 2,700
 
Proceeds from credit agreement27,184
 26,092
 62,146
25,930
 27,184
 26,092
 
Principal payments on credit agreement(22,356) (3,338) (73,476)(56,885) (22,356) (3,338) 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(1,216) 6,970
 (14,530)(33,733) (1,216) 6,970
 
           
Increase (decrease) in cash822
 (4,894) 2,784
1,515
 822
 (4,894) 
Cash, beginning of year747
 5,641
 2,857
1,569
 747
 5,641
 
Cash, end of year$1,569
 $747
 $5,641
$3,084
 $1,569
 $747
 



See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
        


MGP INGREDIENTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands)

Capital
Stock
Preferred
 
Issued
Common
 
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Treasury
Stock
 Total
Capital
Stock
Preferred
 
Issued
Common
 
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Treasury
Stock
 Total
Balance, December 31, 2013(a)
$4
 $6,715

$9,755

$65,659

$(4)
$(526)
$81,603
Comprehensive income:             
Net income
 
 
 23,675
 
 
 23,675
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 (728) 
 (728)
Dividends and dividend equivalents, net of estimated forfeitures
 
 
 (907) 
 
 (907)
Share-based compensation
 
 713
 
 
 
 713
Excess tax benefits
 
 463
 
 
 
 463
Stock shares awarded, forfeited or vested
 
 
 
 
 218
 218
Stock shares repurchased for payment of taxes
 
 
 
 
 (672) (672)
Balance, December 2014$4

$6,715

$10,931

$88,427

$(732)
$(980)
$104,365
Balance, December 31, 2014$4

$6,715

$10,931

$88,427

$(732)
$(980)
$104,365
Comprehensive income:                          
Net income
 
 
 26,191
 
 
 26,191

 
 
 26,191
 
 
 26,191
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 232
 
 232

 
 
 
 232
 
 232
Dividends and dividend equivalents, net of estimated forfeitures
 
 
 (1,087) 
 
 (1,087)
 
 
 (1,087) 
 
 (1,087)
Share-based compensation
 
 999
 
 
 
 999

 
 999
 
 
 
 999
Excess tax benefits
 
 453
 
 
 
 453

 
 453
 
 
 
 453
Stock shares awarded, forfeited or vested
 
 
 
 
 415
 415

 
 
 
 
 415
 415
Stock shares repurchased
 
 
 
 
 (15,408) (15,408)
 
 
 
 
 (15,408) (15,408)
Balance, December 2015$4
 $6,715
 $12,383
 $113,531
 $(500) $(15,973) $116,160
Balance, December 31, 2015$4
 $6,715
 $12,383
 $113,531
 $(500) $(15,973) $116,160
Comprehensive income:                          
Net income
 


 31,184
 
 
 31,184

 


 31,184
 
 
 31,184
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 127
 
 127

 
 
 
 127
 
 127
Dividends and dividend equivalents, net of estimated forfeitures
 
 
 (2,063) 
 
 (2,063)
 
 
 (2,063) 
 
 (2,063)
Share-based compensation
 
 1,896
 
 
 
 1,896

 
 1,896
 
 
 
 1,896
Excess tax benefits
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stock shares awarded, forfeited or vested
 
 
 
 
 506
 506

 
 
 
 
 506
 506
Stock shares repurchased
 
 
 
 
 (1,518) (1,518)
 
 
 
 
 (1,518) (1,518)
Balance, December 2016$4

$6,715

$14,279

$142,652

$(373)
$(16,985)
$146,292
Balance, December 31, 2016$4

$6,715

$14,279

$142,652

$(373)
$(16,985)
$146,292
Comprehensive income:             
Net income
 


 41,823
 
 
 41,823
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 62
 
 62
Dividends and dividend equivalents, net of estimated forfeitures
 
 
 (17,346) 
 
 (17,346)
Share-based compensation
 
 2,065
 
 
 
 2,065
Stock shares awarded, forfeited or vested
 
 (2,432) 
 
 2,929
 497
Stock shares repurchased
 
 
 
 
 (4,663) (4,663)
Balance, December 31, 2017$4
 $6,715
 $13,912
 $167,129
 $(311) $(18,719) $168,730

(a) See Note 1. Immaterial Error Corrections.








See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
        


MGP INGREDIENTS, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, unless otherwise noted)

NOTE 1:NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Company.  MGP Ingredients, Inc. ("Registrant" or "Company"Company") is a Kansas corporation headquartered in Atchison, Kansas.  It was incorporated in 2011Kansas and is a holding company with no operations of its own.  Its principal directly owned operating subsidiaries are MGPI Processing, Inc. ("Processing") and MGPI of Indiana, LLC ("MGPI-I").  Processing was incorporated in Kansas in 1957 and is the successor to a business founded in 1941 by Cloud L. Cray, Sr.  Prior to the Reorganization (discussed below), Processing was named MGP Ingredients, Inc.  MGPI-I (previously named Firebird Acquisitions, Inc.) acquired substantially all the beverage alcohol distillery assets of Lawrenceburg Distillers Indiana, LLC ("LDI") at its Lawrenceburg and Greendale, Indiana facility on December 27, 2011.

On January 3, 2012, MGP Ingredients, Inc. was reorganized into a holding company structure (the "Reorganization"). In connection with the Reorganization and to further the holding company structure, Processing distributed three of its formerly directly owned subsidiaries, MGPI-I, D.M. Ingredients, GmbH ("DMI"), and Midwest Grain Pipeline, Inc., to the Company.  Processing’s other subsidiary, Illinois Corn Processing, LLC ("ICP"), remained a directly owned subsidiary of Processing and is now 30 percent owned. During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, through a series of transactions, the Company formed a joint venture by contributing its former Pekin, Illinois facility to a newly formed company, ICP, and then selling a 50 percent interest in ICP.  In 2012, the Company sold an additional 20 percent interest in ICP.  The Company purchases food grade alcohol products manufactured by ICP.  
Throughout the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, when "the Company" is used in reference to activities prior to the Reorganization, the reference is to the combined business, Processing (formerly MGP Ingredients, Inc.) and its consolidated subsidiaries, and when "the Company" is used in reference to activities occurring after the Reorganization, reference is to the combined business of MGP Ingredients, Inc. (formerly MGPI Holdings, Inc.) and its consolidated subsidiaries, except to the extent the context indicates otherwise.
MGP is a leading producer and supplier of premium distilled spirits and specialty wheat proteinsprotein and starches.starch food ingredients. Distilled spirits include premium bourbon and rye whiskeys and grain neutral spirits, including vodka and gin. MGP is also a top producer of high quality industrial alcohol for use in both food and non-food applications. The Company’s proteinsprotein and starchesstarch food ingredients provide a host of functional, nutritional, and sensory benefits for a wide range of food products to serve the packaged goods industry. MGP is also a top producer of high quality industrial alcohol for use in both food and non-food applications. The Company's distillery products are derived from corn and other grains (including rye, barley, wheat, barley malt, and milo), and its ingredient products are derived from wheat flour.  The majority of the Company's sales are made directly or through distributors to manufacturers and processors of finished packaged goods or to bakeries. 

The Company has two reportable segments: distillery products and ingredient solutions. The distillery products segment consists primarily of food grade alcohol, and to a much lesser extent, fuel grade alcohol, distillers feed, and corn oil. Distillers feed, fuel grade alcohol, and corn oil are co-products of the Company's distillery operations.  The ingredient solutions segment products primarily consist of specialty starches, specialty proteins, commodity starches, and commodity wheat proteins (or commodity vital wheat gluten (or commodity wheat proteins)gluten).  The Company procures textured wheat proteins through a toll manufacturing arrangement at a facility in the United States. During December 2011, through its wholly owned subsidiary, MGPI-I, the Company acquired the beverage alcohol distillery assets of LDI.

The Company sells its products on normal credit terms to customers in a variety of industries located primarily throughout the United States and Japan.States.  The Company operates facilities in Atchison, Kansas and in Lawrenceburg and Greendale, Indiana.
 
Use of Estimates.  The financial reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP").  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  The application of certain of these policies places significant demands on management’s judgment, with financial reporting results relying on estimation about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain.  For all of these policies, management cautions that future events rarely develop as forecast, and estimates routinely require adjustment and may require material adjustment.



Principles of Consolidation.  The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents.  Short-term liquid investments with an initial maturity of 90 days or less are considered cash equivalents.  Cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates market value due to the relatively short maturity of these instruments.

Receivables.  Receivables are stated at the amounts billed to customers.  The Company provides an allowance for estimated doubtful accounts.  This allowance is based upon a review of outstanding receivables, historical collection information, and an evaluation of existing economic conditions impacting the Company’s customers.  Accounts receivable are ordinarily due 30 days after the issuance of the invoice.  Receivables are considered delinquent after 30 days past the due date.  These delinquent receivables are monitored and are charged to the allowance for doubtful accounts based upon an evaluation of individual circumstances of the customer.  Account balances are written off after collection efforts have been made and potential recovery is considered remote.

Inventory.  Inventory includes finished goods, raw materials in the form of agricultural commodities used in the production process, and certain maintenance and repair items.  BourbonBourbons and whiskeys are normally aged in barrels for several years, following industry practice; all barreled bourbon and whiskey is classified as a current asset. The Company includes warehousing, insurance, and other carrying charges applicable to barreled whiskey in inventory costs.

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or marketnet realizable value on the first-in, first-out, or FIFO, method.  Inventory valuations are impacted by constantly changing prices paid for key materials, primarily corn.

Derivative Instruments. The Company recognizes all derivatives as either assets or liabilities at their fair values.  Accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on whether the derivative has been designated as a cash flow hedge and the effectiveness of the hedging relationship.  Derivatives qualify for treatment as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes when there is a high correlation between the change in fair value of the hedging instrument ("derivative") and the related change in value of the underlying commitment ("hedged item").  For derivatives that qualify as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes, except for ineffectiveness, the change in fair value has no net impact on earnings, to the extent the derivative is considered effective, until the hedged item or transaction affects earnings.  For derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes, or for the ineffective portion of a hedging instrument, the change in fair value affects current period net earnings.  


Properties, Depreciation, and Amortization.  Property, plant, and equipment are typically stated at cost.  Additions, including those that increase the life or utility of an asset, are capitalized and all properties are depreciated over their estimated remaining useful lives.  Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight line method over the following estimated useful lives:
Buildings and improvements20 – 40 years
Transportation equipment5 – 6 years
Machinery and equipment10 – 12 years
 
Maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. The cost of property, plant, and equipment sold, retired, or otherwise disposed of, as well as related accumulated depreciation and amortization, isare eliminated from the property accounts with related gains and losses reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income.  The Company capitalizes interest costs associated with significant construction projects.  Total interest incurred for 2017, 2016, 2015, and 20142015 is noted below:
  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
Interest costs charged to expense $1,294
 $534
 $816
Plus: Interest cost capitalized 198
 297
 107
Total $1,492

$831
 $923


  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Interest costs charged to expense $1,184
 $1,294
 $534
Plus: Interest cost capitalized 293
 198
 297
Total $1,477

$1,492
 $831

Equity Method Investments.  The Company accounts for its investment in non-consolidated subsidiaries under the equity method of accounting when the Company has significant influence, but does not have more than 50 percent voting control, and is not considered the primary beneficiary.  Under the equity method of accounting, the Company reflects its investment in non-consolidated subsidiaries within the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as Equity method investments; the Company’s share of the earnings or losses of the non-consolidated subsidiaries are reflected as Equity method investment earnings (loss) in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

The Company reviews its investments in non-consolidated subsidiaries for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investments may not be fully recoverable. Evidence of a loss in value that is other than temporary include, but are not limited to, the absence of an ability to recover the carrying amount of the investment, the inability of the investee to sustain an earnings capacity which would justify the carrying amount of the investment, or, where applicable, estimated sales proceeds which are insufficient to recover the carrying amount of the investment. If the fair value of the investment is determined to be less than the carrying value and the decline in value is considered to be other than temporary, an appropriate write down is recorded based on the excess of the carrying value over the best estimate of fair value of the investment.

Earnings (loss) per Share ("EPS).EPS.  Basic and diluted EPS is computed using the two class method, which is an earnings allocation formula that determines net income per share for each class of Common Stock and participating security according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings.  Per share amounts are computed by dividing net income attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average shares outstanding during each year or period.

Deferred Credits. Funding received by the Company in the form of grants and/or reimbursements related to specific assets are allocated to the associated assets and are included as deferred credits in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As the related assets are depreciated, deferred credits are reduced with a credit to Cost of sales or Selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Income Taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes using an asset and liability method which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. A valuation allowance is recognized if it is more likely than not that at least some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
Evaluating the need for, and amount of, a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets often requires significant judgment and extensive analysis of all available evidence on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis. Such judgments require the Company to interpret existing tax law and other published guidance as applied to its circumstances. As part of this assessment, the Company considers both positive and negative evidence about its profitability and tax situation. A valuation allowance is provided if, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that all or some portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company generally considers the following and other positive and negative evidence to determine the likelihood of realization of the deferred tax assets:
Future realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on projected taxable income of the appropriate character from the Company's continuing operations.
Future reversals of existing temporary differences are heavily weighted sources of objectively verifiable positive evidence.
The long carryback and carryforward periods permitted under the tax law are objectively verified positive evidence.
Tax planning strategies can be, depending on their nature, heavily weighted sources of objectively verifiable positive evidence when the strategies are available and can be reasonably executed. Tax planning strategies are actions that are prudent and feasible, considering current operations and strategic plans, which the Company ordinarily might not take, but would take to prevent a tax benefit from expiring unused. Tax planning strategies, if available, may accelerate the recovery of a deferred tax asset so the tax benefit of the deferred tax asset can be carried back.
Projections of future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences are a source of positive evidence when the projections are combined with a history of recent profits and current financial trends and can be reasonably estimated.

Accounting for uncertainty in income tax positions requires management judgment and the use of estimates in determining whether the impact of a tax position is "more likely than not" of being sustained. The Company considers many factors when evaluating and estimating its tax positions, which may require periodic adjustment and which may not accurately anticipate actual outcomes. It is reasonably possible that amounts reserved for potential exposure could change significantly as a result of the conclusion of tax examinations and, accordingly, materially affect the Company’s reported net income after tax.



Revenue Recognition.  Except as discussed below, revenue from the sale of the Company’s products is recognized asat the point in time products are delivered to customers according to shipping terms and when title and risk of loss have transferred.  Income from various government incentive grant programs is recognized as it is earned.
 
The Company’s Distillery segment routinely produces unaged distillate, and this product is frequently barreled and warehoused at a Company location for an extended period of time in accordance with directions received from the Company’s customers.  This product must meet customer acceptance specifications, the risks of ownership and title for these goods must be passed, and requirements for bill and hold revenue recognition must be met prior to the Company recognizing revenue for this product.  Separate warehousing agreements are maintained for customers who store their product with the Company and warehouse services revenue is recognized over time as the services are provided.
 
Sales include customer paid freight costs billed to customers of $14,761, $13,974, and $14,498 for 2017, 2016, and $16,209 for 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.

Cost of Sales. Cost of sales is primarily comprised of the direct materials and supplies consumed in the manufacturing of product, as well as manufacturing labor, depreciation expense, and direct overhead expense necessary to acquire and convert the purchased materials and supplies into finished product. Cost of sales also includes the cost to distribute products to customers, inbound freight costs, internal transfer costs, warehousing costs, inspection costs, and other shipping and handling activity.


Excise Taxes.  Certain sales of the Company are subject to excise taxes, which the Company collects from customers and remits to governmental authorities.  The Company records the collection ofpresents these excise taxes on distilled products sold to these customers as accrued expenses.  No revenue or expense is recognized inusing the Consolidated Statements of Income related tonet method (excluded from sales). For excise taxes paid by customers directly to governmental authorities.

Recognition of Insurance Recoveries. Estimated loss contingencies areauthorities, there is no revenue or expense recognized as charges to income when they are probable and reasonably estimable.  Insurance recoveries are not recognized until all contingencies related toin the insurance claim have been resolved and settlement has been reached with the insurer.  Insurance recoveries, to the extent of costs and lost profits, are reported as a reduction to Cost of sales on theCompany's Consolidated Statements of Income.  Insurance recoveries, in excess of costs and losses are included in Insurance recoveries on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Research and Development.  During 2016, 2015, and 2014, the Company incurred $916, and $748, $1,622 respectively, on research and development activities. These activities were expensed and are included in Selling, general and administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Long-Lived Assets and Loss on Impairment of Assets.  Management reviews long-lived assets whenever events or circumstances indicate that usage may be limited and carrying values may not be fully recoverable.  Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are determined to be impaired, the impairment is measured by the amount by which the asset carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.  Assets to be disposed are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.  Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow models, quoted market values and third party independent appraisals, as considered necessary.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Goodwill is an asset representing the future economic benefits arising from other assets acquired in a business combination that are not individually identified and separately recognized. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are assets that are not amortized as there is no foreseeable limit to cash flows generated from them. Management reviews goodwill and other intangible assets whenever events or circumstances indicate that usage may be limited and carrying values may not be fully recoverable.  Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are determined to be impaired, the impairment is measured by the amount by which the asset carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.  Assets to be disposed are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.  Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow models, quoted market values and third party independent appraisals, as considered necessary.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments.  The Company determines the fair values of its financial instruments based on a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based upon the observability of inputs. Fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.


 
The Company’s short term financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable.  The carrying value of the short term financial instruments approximates the fair value due to their short term nature. These financial instruments have no stated maturities or the financial instruments have short term maturities that approximate market.
 
The fair value of the Company’s debt is estimated based on current market interest rates for debt with similar maturities and credit quality. The fair value of the Company’s debt was $37,412$24,838 and $34,603$37,412 at December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively. The financial statement carrying value (including unamortized loan fees) was $36,001$24,554 and $33,460$36,001 at December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively.  These fair values are considered Level 2 under the fair value hierarchy.
Pension Benefits. In April 2015, the Company received approval from the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation to terminate its pension plans for employees covered under collective bargaining agreements. Benefit obligations at December 31, 2015 were zero, as $741 in termination liabilities was distributed to plan participants or transferred to an insurer during the quarter ended June 30, 2015, and was followed by the closing of the pension trust account in 2015. Prior to termination, the Company accounted for its pension benefit plan's funded status as a liability included in Other non current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company measured the funded status of its pension benefit plans using actuarial techniques that reflected management’s assumptions for discount rate, expected long-term investment returns on plan assets, salary increases, expected retirement, mortality, and employee turnover. Assumptions regarding employee and retiree life expectancy were based upon the RP 2000 Combined Mortality Table ("2000 tables"). Although the Society of Actuaries released new mortality tables on October 27, 2014, the Internal Revenue Service continued to use the 2000 tables through 2015. Because the pension benefit plan was being terminated, the actuarial valuation of the pension benefit plan assumed all remaining assets of the plan would be distributed to plan participants or transferred to an insurer during 2015, so the new mortality tables were not adopted. The funding by the Company to terminate the plans was $741 and was recognized when the pension plan settlement was fully executed, during the quarter ended June 30, 2015.

Post-Employment Benefits. The Company accounts for its post-employment benefit plan's funded status as a liability included in Accrued Retirement Health and Life Insurance Benefits on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Company measures the obligation for other post-employment benefits using actuarial techniques that reflect management’s assumptions for discount rate, expected retirement, mortality, employee turnover, health care costs for retirees and future increases in health care costs, which are based upon actual claims experience and other environmental and market factors impacting the costs of health care in the short and long-term.  Assumptions regarding employee and retiree life expectancy are based upon the Society of Actuaries RP-2014 Mortality Tables using Scale MP-2015.  The discount rate is determined based on the rates of return on high quality fixed income investments using the Citigroup Pension Liability Index as of the measurement date (long-term rates of return are not considered because the plan has no assets).

Stock Options and Restricted Stock Awards.  The Company has share-based employee compensation plans primarily in the form of restricted common stock ("restricted stock"), restricted stock units ("RSUs") and stock options, which are described more fully in Note 9. The Company recognizes the cost of share-based payments over the vesting period based on the grant date fair value of the award.  The grant date fair value for stock options is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model adjusted for the unique characteristics of the awards.

Immaterial Error Correction. During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company identified errors in in the recording of its long term incentive compensation. The errors were due to an understatement of expense associated with share-based compensation awards for which the related expense was recorded prior to January 1, 2014. An immaterial error correction was made to the opening balances of the Company's Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity as of December 31, 2013, whereby retained earnings was reduced by $1,027 with a corresponding increase to Additional paid-in capital of $1,027. This immaterial correction had no impact on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Income, the computations of Basic and diluted EPS, the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, or the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014.



Recent Accounting Pronouncements. In DecemberFebruary 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-19, Technical Corrections and Improvements, which amends a number of Topics in the FASB ASC. The ASU is part of an ongoing FASB project to facilitate Codification updates for non-substantive technical corrections, clarifications, and improvements that are not expected to have a significant effect on accounting practice or create a significant administrative cost to most entities. The ASU will apply to all reporting entities within the scope of the affected accounting guidance. Most amendments are effective upon issuance (December 2016). Certain amendments that require transition guidance are effective for: Public business entities, for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 (for cloud computing arrangements); All other entities, for annual periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 (for cloud computing arrangements); and All entities, for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 (for certain others, including the change to fair value measurement disclosures). Early adoption is permitted for the amendments that require transition guidance. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-19 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures and is not planning to early adopt the new standard.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash, which requires companies to include cash and cash equivalents that have restrictions on withdrawal or use in total cash and cash equivalents on the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for public business entities for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, adjustments should be reflected at the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-18 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, which requires entities to recognize at the transaction date the income tax consequences of intercompany asset transfers other than inventory. This ASU is effective for public business entities for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Entities may early adopt the ASU, but only at the beginning of an annual period for which no financial statements (interim or annual) have already been issued or made available for issuance. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-16 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which addresses eight classification issues related to the statement of cash flows: Debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; Settlement of zero coupon bonds; Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; Proceeds from the settlement of corporate owned life insurance policies, including bank owned life insurance policies; Distributions received from equity method investees; Beneficial interests in securitization transactions; and Separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle.
This ASU is effective for public business entities for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the ASU in an interim period, adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. Entities should apply this ASU using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. If it is impracticable for an entity to apply the ASU retrospectively for some of the issues, it may apply the amendments for those issues prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2016-15 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which significantly changes the way entities recognize impairment of many financial assets by requiring immediate recognition of estimated credit losses expected to occur over their remaining life. This ASU is effective for public business entities that are SEC filers for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2016-13 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which aims to make leasing activities more transparent and comparable and requires substantially all leases be recognized by lessees on their balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and corresponding lease liability, including leases currently accounted for as operating leases. This ASU is effective for allpublic business entities for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. At December 31, 2016,2017, the Company had various machinery and equipment operating leases, as well as operating leases for 207223 rail cars and one office space.



In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which will significantly change the income statement impact of equity investments, and the recognition of changes in fair value of financial liabilities when the fair value option is elected. The ASU is effective for public business entities for interim and annual periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-01 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (Topic 330), which simplifies its current requirement that an entity measure inventory at lower of cost or market, when market could be replacement cost, net realizable value, or net realizable value less an approximately normal profit margin. Inventory within the scope of ASU 2015-11 should be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. ASU 2015-11 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2015-11 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which will replace numerous requirements in U.S. GAAP, including industry specific requirements, and provide companies with a single revenue recognition model for recognizing revenue from contracts with customers.

The core principle of the new standard, as well as the updates, is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The two permitted transition methods under the new standard are the full retrospective method, in which case the standard would be applied to each prior reporting period presented and the cumulative effect of applying the standard would be recognized at the earliest period shown, or the modified retrospective method, in which case the cumulative effect of applying the standard would be recognized at the date of initial application. In July 2015,The Company will adopt the FASB approved the deferralrequirements of the new standard's effective date by one year. The new standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The FASB will permit companies to adoptin the new standard early, but not beforefirst quarter of 2018 using the original effective date of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, but the Company is not planning to early adopt the new standard.modified retrospective transition method.
 


In 2016, the Company established an implementation team consisting of internal and external representatives. The implementation team is in the process of assessingassessed the impact the new standard will have on the consolidated financial statements and assessingis evaluating the impact onof the new standard and gathering data and information for the expanded revenue disclosure required.   The scoping for the assessment is complete and the testing of individual contracts in the Company's revenue streams.is also complete.  Assessment findings have been compiled and have been reviewed. In addition, the implementation team is in the process of identifying,identified and will then implement appropriate changes to business processes, systems, andand/or controls to support recognition and disclosure under the new standard. The implementation team will reporthas reported findings and progress of the project to management and the Audit Committee on a frequent basis through the effective date. The Companyadoption of ASU 2014-09 will adoptnot result in a difference in the requirementstiming of the new standardrecognition of costs to obtain and/or fulfill a contract; and the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will not result in a material difference in the first quarteramount and/or timing of 2018 and anticipates using the modified retrospective transition method. The Company has not yet determined the quantitative impact on its financial statements.revenue recognition.

NOTE 2:OTHER BALANCE SHEET CAPTIONS

Inventory.  Inventory consists of the following:Inventory.
December 31,December 31,
2016 20152017 2016
Finished goods$14,002
 $15,126
$13,284
 $14,002
Barreled distillate (bourbon and whiskey)50,941
 28,278
Barreled distillate (bourbons and whiskeys)65,726
 50,941
Raw materials4,274
 6,675
3,954
 4,274
Work in process1,933
 2,364
1,935
 1,933
Maintenance materials6,231
 5,371
7,256
 6,231
Other1,477
 887
994
 1,477
Total$78,858
 $58,701
$93,149
 $78,858
 


Property, and equipment.  Propertyplant, and equipment, consist of the following:net.
December 31,December 31,
2016 20152017 2016
Land, buildings and improvements$67,487
 $56,143
Land, buildings, and improvements$72,223
 $67,487
Transportation equipment3,253
 5,417
3,286
 3,253
Machinery and equipment164,871
 152,742
175,371
 164,871
Construction in progress10,608
 15,612
16,408
 10,608
Property and equipment, at cost246,219
 229,914
Property, plant, and equipment, at cost267,288
 246,219
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization(153,428) (146,360)(164,237) (153,428)
Property and equipment, net$92,791
 $83,554
Property, plant, and equipment, net$103,051
 $92,791

Property and equipment includes machinery and equipment assets under capital leases totaling $0 and $8,376 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Accumulated depreciation for these leased assets was $5,756 at December 31, 2015.

Accrued expenses.  Accrued expenses consist of the following:
December 31,December 31,
2016 20152017 2016
Employee benefit plans$820
 $1,027
$962
 $820
Salaries and wages5,641
 6,790
7,452
 5,641
Restructuring and severance charges124
 517
Property taxes824
 784
1,185
 824
Other accrued expenses1,536
 1,282
Other1,572
 1,660
Total$8,945
 $10,400
$11,171
 $8,945

Deferred credits. Deferred credits consist of the following:
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2016 2015 
USDA grant(a)
 $1,434
 $1,949
 
LCD reimbursement(b)
 959
 1,042
 
Other reimbursement 313
 411
 
Deferred incentive 272
 
 
Total $2,978
 $3,402
 

(a)
In 2001, the United States Department of Agriculture developed a grant program for the gluten industry ("USDA grant") and the Company received nearly $26,000 of grants required to be used for research, marketing, promotional and capital costs related to value added gluten and starch products.
(b)
In 2012, the Lawrenceburg Conservancy District ("LCD") in Greendale, IN agreed to reimburse the Company up to $1,250 of certain capital maintenance costs of a Company owned warehouse structure that is integral to the efficacy of the LCD’s flood control system ("LCD reimbursement").  Certain capital maintenance activities were completed prior to December 31, 2012 and the remaining capital maintenance activities were completed during 2014. As of December 31, 2014 the Company had received a total of $1,236 in reimbursements.

NOTE 3:EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS

As of December 31, 2016,2017, the Company’s investmentCompany had no investments accounted for onusing the equity method of accounting was a 30 percent interest in ICP, which manufactures alcohol for fuel, industrial and beverage applications. accounting.

        


ICPIllinois Corn Processing ("ICP") Investment

ICP's Limited Liability Company Agreement generally allocates profits, losses and distributions of cash of ICP based on the percentage of a member's capital contributions to ICP relative to total capital contributions of all members ("Percentage Interest") to ICP, of whichOn July 3, 2017, the Company hascompleted the sale of its 30 percent equity ownership interest in ICP to Pacific Ethanol Central, LLC ("Pacific Ethanol"), consistent with an Agreement and its joint venture partner, ICP Holdings, has 70 percent.

Plan of Merger ("Merger Agreement") entered into on June 26, 2017. The Limited Liability Company Agreement grants the right to either member to elect (the "Electing Member") to shut down the Pekin facility ("Shutdown Election") if ICP operates at an EBITDA (as defined in the agreement) loss greater than or equal to $500 in any quarter, subject to the right of the other member (the "Objecting Member") to override that election. If the Objecting Member overrides the election, then EBITDA loss and EBITDA profit for each subsequent quarter are allocated 80 percent to the Objecting Member and 20 percent to the Electing Member until the end of the applicable quarter in which the Electing Member withdraws its Shutdown Election and thereafter allocations revert to a 70 percent/30 percent split (subject to a catch up allocation of 80 percent of EBITDA profits to the Objecting Member until it equals the amount of EBITDA loss allocated to such member on an 80 percent/20 percent basis).  ICP experienced an EBITDA loss in excess of $500 for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, which was one factor that prompted the Company to deliver notice of its Shutdown Election on April 18, 2013. However, the Company withdrew its Shutdown Election on March 31, 2014 (thereby causing the allocation of profits and losses to revert to 30 percenttotal transaction proceeds to the Company and 70 percent tofrom the ICP Holdings as of April 1, 2014) based partially on the strong financial results ICP generated during the period ended March 31, 2014.

During 2014, management reassessed the most likely events that would result insale transaction represented a recoveryreturn of its investment in ICP of $22,832 (net of fees and asincluding additional dividends), which included a result, the Company remeasured its cumulative equity in the undistributed earningsgain on sale of ICP. The cumulative effect of this change in estimate resulted in a decrease in equity method investment earnings of $11,381 (before tax), on the Company's 2017 Consolidated Statements of Income.

The Merger Agreement also contemplated a special distribution of all of ICP’s cash and cash equivalents to equity owners prior to the closing. On June 28 and June 30, 2017, the Company received cash dividend distributions from ICP of $1,882 for the period beginning April 1, 2013$6,600 and ending March 31, 2014; a decrease in the earnings per share ("EPS") of $0.10 per share for the year ended December 31, 2014; and a decrease in the related equity method$830, respectively, that reduced its investment in ICP at December 31, 2014, of $1,882.ICP.

On December 3, 2014, the ICP advisory board recommended payment of a cash dividend distribution to its members. The Company received its portion of the distribution, $4,835, on December 4, 2014. In addition, on February 26, 2016, the Company received a cash dividend distribution from ICP of $3,300 which wasthat reduced its 30 percent ownership share of the total distribution (see Note 14). The cash dividend distributions received were a return on investment and, therefore, reduced the Company's equity method investment in ICP on its consolidated balance sheets by the distribution amounts in 2014 and 2016, respectively, and was a sourceas of cash flow from operating activities in the amounts of the distributions in 2014 and 2016, respectively.

On April 9, 2015, ICP obtained a $30,000 revolving credit facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., which could be increased in the future by an additional $20,000, subject to lender approval. The revolver matures on April 9, 2018. The Company has no funding requirement to ICP.December 31, 2016.

DMI Investment

On December 29, 2014, the Company gave notice to DMI and to the Company's partner in DMI, Crespel and Dieters GmbH & Co. KG ("C&D"), to terminate the joint venture effective June 30, 2015. C&D also provided notice to terminate DMI effective June 30, 2015. On June 22, 2015, a termination agreement was executed by and between the Company, DMI, and C&D to dissolve DMI effective June 30, 2015. Additionally, on June 22, 2015 a termination agreement was executed by and between the Company and DMI to terminate their distribution agreement effective June 29, 2015. Under German law, commencingCommencing on June 30, 2015, normal operations for DMI ceased and a one year winding down process under German law began once the registration of resolutions, appointment of liquidators, inventory count, and publication of the notice to potential creditors was complete, which occurred on October 29, 2015. On December 23, 2016, the Company received its portion of the remaining DMI liquidation proceeds, which totaled $351, as a return of its investment.investment, in the amount of $351.

Related Party Transactions

Transactions. See Note 14 for discussion of related party transactions.

Realizability of investments

investments. No other than temporary impairments were recorded during 2017, 2016, 2015, and 20142015 for the Company's equity method investments.



Summary Financial Information
Information. Condensed financial information of the Company’s equity method investment in ICP is shown below:ICP:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
ICP’s Operating results:2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Net sales(a)
$177,401
 $166,905
 $236,486
$78,062
 $177,401
 $166,905
Cost of sales and expenses(b)
(163,837) (146,098) (196,551)(79,224) (163,837) (146,098)
Net income$13,564
 $20,807
(c) 
$39,935
$(1,162) $13,564
(c) 
$20,807

(a) 
Includes related party sales to MGPI of $17,672, $27,675, and $38,941 for 2017, 2016, and $36,289 for 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.
(b) 
Includes depreciation and amortization of $1,720, $3,030, and $2,634 for 2017, 2016, and $2,847 for 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.
(c) 
Includes business interruption insurance proceeds of $4,112 for 2015.

The Company’s equity method investment earnings (losses) are as follows::
 
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
ICP (30% interest)$4,069
 $6,242
 $10,098
$(348) $4,069
 $6,242
DMI (50% interest)(33)
(a) 
(140) 39

 (33) (140)
Total$4,036
 $6,102
 $10,137
$(348) $4,036
 $6,102

(a)
On December 23, 2016, the Company received its portion of the remaining DMI liquidation proceeds totaling $351. Prior to receiving the proceeds, the Company's equity method investment was $384. The difference of $33 was recognized as an equity method investment loss for the year ended December 31, 2016.

The Company’s equity method investments are as follows:investments:
 December 31,
 2016 2015
ICP (30% interest) (a)
$18,934
 $18,179
DMI (50% interest)
 384
  Total$18,934
 $18,563
 December 31,
 2017 2016
ICP (30% interest)$
 $18,934

(a)
During 2016, the Company received a $3,300 cash distribution from ICP, which reduced the Company's investment in ICP.


NOTE 4:GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETASSETS
The following table details the amounts recorded as goodwillGoodwill and other intangible asset andassets are components of other assetsOther assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (including no accumulated impairment losses):Sheets:
Balance as of December 31, 2015$
 December 31, 
 2017 2016 
Goodwill1,500
 $1,500
 $1,500
 
Brand name (indefinite lived)350
 350
 350
 
Balance as of December 31, 2016$1,850
Other intangible asset, net 28
 
 
Balance as of December 31, 2017 $1,878
 $1,850
 



NOTE 5:CORPORATE BORROWINGS AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS

Indebtedness Outstanding.  Debt consists of the following:Outstanding.
 December 31,
 2016 2015
Credit Agreement - Revolver, 2.45% (variable rate) due 2020$16,000
 $23,172
Credit Agreement - Fixed Asset Sub-Line term loan, 2.86% (variable rate) due 20205,253
 6,254
Credit Agreement - term loan, 2.86% (variable rate) due 202013,000
 
Secured Promissory Note, 3.71% (variable rate) due 20222,324
 2,670
Secured Promissory Note, 6.89% (variable rate), due 2016.
 36
Capital Lease Obligation, 2.61%, due 2017
 1,964
Unamortized loan fees(a)
(576) (636)
Total36,001
 33,460
Less current maturities of long term debt(4,359) (3,345)
Long-term debt$31,642
 $30,115
  December 31, 
Description(a)
 2017 2016 
Credit Agreement - Revolver, 2.935% (variable rate) due 2022 $3,298
 $16,000
(c) 
Credit Agreement - Fixed Asset Sub-Line term loan (closed August 23, 2017 - see below) 
 5,253
(c) 
Credit Agreement - Term Loan (closed August 23, 2017 - see below) 
 13,000
(c) 
Secured Promissory Note, 3.71% (fixed rate) due 2022 1,966
 2,324
 
Prudential Note Purchase Agreement, 3.53% (fixed rate) due 2027 20,000
 
 
Total indebtedness outstanding 25,264
 36,577
 
    Less unamortized loan fees(b)
 (710) (576) 
Total indebtedness outstanding, net 24,554
 36,001
 
    Less current maturities of long-term debt (372) (4,359) 
Long-term debt $24,182
 $31,642
 

(a)Interest rates are as of December 31, 2017.
(b) Loan fees are being amortized over the life of the Credit Agreement and Note Purchase Agreement.
(c) The 2016 Credit Agreement amounts relate to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement detailed below.

Credit Agreement and Note Purchase Agreement.On March 21, 2016,August 23, 2017, the Company entered into a Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreementnew credit agreement (the "Credit Agreement") with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. The Credit Agreement contains customary terms and conditions substantially similar toreplaced the SecondCompany’s Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, (the "Previous Credit Agreement")which included a revolver, a fixed asset sub-line term loan, and associated schedules with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, except as described in the discussion that follows. Such terms and conditions include limitations on mergers, consolidations, reorganizations, recapitalizations, indebtedness and certain payments, as well as financial condition covenants relating to leverage and interest coverage ratios.a term loan. The Company's obligations under the Credit Agreement provides for a $150,000 revolving credit facility. The Company may be accelerated upon customary eventsincrease the facility from time to time by an aggregate principal amount of default, including, without limitation, non-paymentup to $25,000 provided certain conditions are satisfied and at the discretion of principal or interest, breaches of covenants, certain judgments against the loan parties, cross defaults to other material debt, a change in control and specified bankruptcy events.lender. The Credit Agreement matures on August 23, 2022.

The Credit Agreement added a $15,000 term loan toincludes certain requirements and covenants, which the Previous Credit Agreement's $80,000 revolving facility resulting in a $95,000 facility. The principal of the term loan can be prepaid at any time without penalty or otherwise will be repaid by the Company in installments of $250 each month, which commenced on May 1, 2016. Additionally, the Credit Agreement reduced certain restrictions on acquisitions. Under the Previous Credit Agreement, only acquisitions less than $1,000 individually and $7,500 in the aggregate were permitted. The Credit Agreement eliminated the individual dollar limitation and increased the aggregate limitation to $35,000. The Credit Agreement also added an increased minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.25x (compared to 1.10x in the Previous Credit Agreement) while the $15,000 term loan is outstanding. However, the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio is only tested if excess availability, after giving effect to such restricted payment, is less than 17.5 percent of the total amount of the facility.

The Company was in compliance with at December 31, 2017. The Company incurred $183 of new loan fees related to the Credit Agreement covenantsduring 2017. The unamortized balance of total loan fees related to the Credit Agreement was $523 at December 31, 2016. The amount2017 and is being amortized over the life of borrowings which the Company may make is subject to borrowing base limitations adjusted for the Fixed Asset Sub-Line collateral as described in the Credit Agreement.

As of December 31, 2016,2017, the Company's total outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement (net of unamortized loan fees of $576) were $33,677, comprised of $15,424 of revolver borrowing, $5,253 of fixed asset sub-line term loan borrowing, and $13,000 of term loan borrowing$3,298 leaving $51,588$146,702 available. The average interest rate for totalthe borrowings of the Credit Agreement at December 31, 20162017 was 2.662.9 percent.

Leases

Capital Lease Obligation.  On June 28, 2011,August 23, 2017, the Company soldalso entered into a major portionNote Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement (the "Note Purchase Agreement") with PGIM, Inc. ("Prudential Capital Group"), an affiliate of Prudential Financial, Inc., and certain affiliates of PGIM, Inc. The Note Purchase Agreement provides for the new process water cooling towersissuance of up to $75,000 of Senior Secured Notes, and related equipment installed at its Atchison facility to U.S. Bancorp Equipment Finance, Inc. for $7,335 and leased them from U.S. Bancorp pursuant to a Master Lease Agreement and related Schedule.  Monthly rentals under the lease were $110 (plus applicable sales/use taxes, if any) and continued until the Company exercised its option to purchaseissued $20,000 of Senior Secured Notes with a maturity date of August 23, 2027. The Senior Secured Notes bear interest at a rate of 3.5 percent per year. The Note Purchase Agreement includes certain requirements and covenants, which the leased property after 60 months in June 2016 for $1,328. As described in Note 2, equipment under a capital lease is included in property and equipment.
        


4.90% Industrial Revenue Bond Obligation.  On December 28, 2006, the Company engagedwas in an industrial revenue bond transactioncompliance with the City of Atchison, Kansas ("the City") pursuant to which the City (i) under a trust indenture, ("the Indenture"), issued $7,000 principal amount of its industrial revenue bonds ("the Bonds") to the Company and used the proceeds thereof to acquire from the Company its office building and technical innovations center in Atchison, Kansas, ("the Facilities") and (ii) leased the Facilities back to the Company under a capital lease ("the Lease").  The assets related to this transaction are included in property and equipment.

The Bonds matured and the Lease expired December 1, 2016, and, accordingly, are no longer offset items at December 31, 2016.
  (1) (2) (3) = (1) - (2)
  
Gross
Amounts of
Recognized
Assets
(Liabilities)
 
Gross
Amounts
offset in the
Balance Sheet
 
Net Amounts of
Assets (Liabilities)
presented in the
Balance Sheet
December 31, 2015:      
Investment in bonds $7,000
 $7,000
 $0
 
Capital lease obligation $(7,000) $(7,000) $0
 
2017. The Company incurred $194 of new loan fees related to the Note Purchase Agreement during 2017. The unamortized balance of total loan fees related to the Note Purchase Agreement was $187 at December 31, 2017 and is being amortized over the life of the Note Purchase Agreement.

Leases and Debt Maturities.  The Company leases railcars and other assets under various operating leases.  For railcar leases, the Company is generally required to pay all service costs associated with the railcars.  Rental payments include minimum rentals plus contingent amounts based on mileage.  Rental expenses under operating leases with terms longer than one month were $2,561, $2,283, and $2,241 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. Minimum annual payments and present values under existing debt maturities are as follows:Maturities.
      
Year Ending
December 31,
 
Credit
Agreement
 
Long-Term
Debt
 Total Debt   
2017 $
 $358
 $358
2018 
 372
 $372
 $372
 
2019 
 386
 $386
 386
 
2020 34,253
 400
 $34,653
 400
 
2021 
 416
 $416
 2,016
 
2022 6,890
 
Thereafter 
 392
 $392
 15,200
 
Total $34,253
 $2,324
 $36,577
 $25,264
 



NOTE 6:INCOME TAXES
 
Income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations is composed of the following: 
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Current:          
Federal$12,637
 $8,954
 $
$14,020
 $12,637
 $8,954
State342
 1,003
 229
379
 342
 1,003
12,979
 9,957
 229
14,399
 12,979
 9,957
Deferred:          
Federal(254) 3,174
 5,010
(3,764) (254) 3,174
State808
 (904) (2,974)300
 808
 (904)
554
 2,270
 2,036
(3,464) 554
 2,270
Total$13,533
 $12,227
 $2,265
$10,935
 $13,533
 $12,227

Income tax expense also included tax expense (benefit) allocated to comprehensive income for 2017, 2016, and 2015, of $37, $84, and 2014, of $84 $83, and $(198), respectively (see the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income).
On December 22, 2017, the United States enacted tax reform legislation commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Tax Act"), resulting in significant modifications to existing law, that impacted the measurement of income taxes for 2017. The Tax Act established new tax laws or modified existing tax laws starting in 2018, including but not limited to, (1) reducing the federal corporate income tax rate to a flat 21 percent rate, (2) eliminating the corporate alternative minimum tax, (3) repealing the domestic production activity deduction, (4) adding a new limitation on deductible interest, (5) changing the limitations on the deductibility of certain executive compensation, and, (6) starting in the quarter ended September 30, 2017, changing the bonus depreciation rules to allow full expensing of qualified property.

The SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 ("SAB 118"), which provides guidance on accounting for the tax effects of the Tax Act. SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the Tax Act enactment date for companies to complete the accounting under Accounting Standards Codification 740 - Income Taxes ("ASC 740"). In accordance with SAB 118, a company must reflect the income tax effects of those aspects of the Tax Act for which the accounting under ASC 740 is complete. To the extent that a company’s accounting for the income tax effects of the Tax Act is incomplete, but it can determine a reasonable estimate, it must record a provisional estimate in the financial statements.



The Company, following guidance in SAB 118, recorded a provisional discrete net tax benefit in its Consolidated Statement of Income through net income of $3,343 in 2017. This net benefit was driven by a re-measurement of the carrying value of its deferred tax assets and liabilities because of corporate rate reduction. The Company’s accounting for all of the elements of the Tax Act is not complete. However, the Company was able to make reasonable estimates and, therefore, recorded provisional estimates. The ultimate impact of the Tax Act may differ from the provisional amount, possibly materially, due to, among other things, additional analysis, changes in interpretations and assumptions the Company made, additional regulatory guidance that may issued, and action the Company may take as a result of the Tax Act. The accounting is expected to be complete when the Company's 2017 United States corporate income tax return is filed in 2018.

A reconciliation of income tax expense from operations at the normal statutory federal rate to the provisionincome tax expense included in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income is shown below:Income:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
"Expected" provision at federal statutory rate$15,651
 $13,446
 $9,116
$18,465
 $15,651
 $13,446
State income taxes, net1,672
 1,714
 709
1,612
 1,672
 1,714
Change in valuation allowance(718) (2,385) (7,618)(578) (718) (2,385)
Domestic production activity deduction(1,247) (1,002) 
(957) (1,247) (1,002)
Share-based compensation(a)
(1,408) N/A
 N/A
(4,254) (1,408) N/A
Compensation limits931
 
 
Federal and state tax credits(1,065) 
 
(1,058) (1,065) 
Tax benefit from the Tax Act(3,343) 
 
Other648
 454
 58
117
 648
 454
Income tax expense$13,533
 $12,227
 $2,265
$10,935
 $13,533
 $12,227
Effective tax rate30.3% 31.8% 8.7%20.7% 30.3% 31.8%
 
(a) 
The Company elected to early adopt ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, in the quarter ended September 30, 2016 and, due to a required change in accounting principle, beginning that quarter, all excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to employee stock compensation are recognized within income tax expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company received a federal tax benefitbenefits in 2017 and 2016 of $4,254 and $1,408, respectively, and a state benefitbenefits of $371 and $163, respectively, for excess tax benefits in 2016 (see Note 9 for additional detail related to the ASU No. 2016-09 adoption).benefits.



The tax effects of temporary differences giving rise to deferred income taxes shown on the Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows:


December 31,December 31,
2016 20152017 2016
Deferred income tax assets:      
Post-retirement liability$1,621
 $1,848
$910
 $1,621
Deferred income1,176
 1,343
543
 1,176
Share-based compensation1,313
 2,247
1,158
 1,313
Capital loss carryforwards716
 1,444

 716
State tax credit carryforwards3,204
 2,653
3,488
 3,204
State operating loss carryforwards1,151
 2,216
1,434
 1,151
Inventories2,560
 1,684
1,346
 2,560
Other1,381
 2,224
766
 1,381
Gross deferred income tax assets$13,122
 $15,659
$9,645
 $13,122
Less: valuation allowance(726) (1,444)(148) (726)
Net deferred income tax assets12,396
 14,215
9,497
 12,396
Deferred income tax liabilities:      
Fixed assets(14,313) (16,050)(9,255) (14,313)
Equity method investments(969) 

 (969)
Other(546) (922)(254) (546)
Gross deferred income tax liabilities(15,828) (16,972)(9,509) (15,828)
Net deferred income tax liability$(3,432) $(2,757)$(12) $(3,432)

A schedule of the change in valuation allowance is as follows:
 Valuation allowance Valuation allowance
Balance at December 31, 2014 $3,829
Reductions 2,385
Balance at December 31, 2015 $1,444
 $1,444
Reductions 718
 718
Balance at December 31, 2016 $726
 $726
Reductions 578
Balance at December 31, 2017 $148

During 2015,As of December 31, 2017, the Company determined thatCompany’s total valuation allowance of $148 related to net operating loss carryforwards in states in which it wasis not more likely than not that it would realize a portioncan create enough state taxable income to fully utilize the carryforwards before expiration of its deferred tax assets. This determination was based onthe carryforward periods. Due to capital gains realized from the sale of the Company's evaluation of the available evidence, both positive and negative, such as historical levels of income and future forecasts of taxable income, among other items. The Company's evaluation of the available evidence was significantly influenced by the fact that30 percent interest in ICP during 2017, the Company was able to utilize all of its federal capital loss carryforwards in a positive cumulative earnings position2017, and, therefore, reduced the valuation allowance and corresponding deferred tax asset by $690. The remainder of the change in the valuation allowance was an increase of $112 for the three year period ended December 31, 2015. The Company recordedadditional net operating loss carryforwards, for a net tax benefitreduction of $2,385 in 2015 due to the release of a portion of its valuation allowance. The remaining valuation allowance as of December 31, 2015, was associated with capital loss carryforwards. The Company determined that utilization of this tax attribute was not more likely than not as of December 31, 2015.$578.

As of December 31, 2016, the Company’s total valuation allowance was $726 relating primarily to capital loss carryovers. Capital loss carryovers remaining as of December 31, 2016 willwere set to expire between 2018 and 2020 if not utilized. During 2016, the Company determined that it was not more likely than not that it would realize a portion ofreduced its deferred tax assets. Substantially all of the 2016 reduction in the valuation allowance representsby $718, of which $689 related to capital loss carryovers that expired unused at the end of 2016. The related2016, and the deferred tax asset and associated valuation allowance associated with expired capital losses were eliminated as of December 31, 2016.



As of December 31, 2016,2017, the Company had $23,074$19,979 in gross state net operating loss carryforwards. As of December 31, 2015,2016, the Company had approximately $45,900$23,074 in state net operating loss carryforwards. Due to varying state carryforward periods, the state net operating loss carryforwards will expire in varying periodsyears between calendar years 20172018 and 2036.2037. The Company has gross state tax credit carryforwards of $4,416 as of December 31, 2017 and $4,929 as of December 31, 2016 and $4,081 as of December 31, 2015.2016. State credit carryforwards,credits, if not used to offset income tax expense in their respective jurisdictions, will expire in varying periodsyears between calendar years 2020 and 2031.2032.


The Company treats accrued interest and penalties related to tax liabilities, if any, as a component of income tax expense.  During 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014,2015, the Company’s activity in accrued interest and penalties was not significant.

The following is a reconciliation of the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits (excluding interest and penalties) for 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014:2015:
 Years Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Beginning of year balance$613
 $613
 $566
Additions for tax positions of prior years2
 
 8
Additions for tax positions of the current year21
 
 39
Reduction for prior year tax positions(48) 
 
Reductions for settlements(545)    
End of year balance$43
 $613

$613

During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company reached a settlement with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) with respect to a 2013 federal income tax examination. In connection with this examination, the IRS reviewed certain items open to review from prior tax years. No cash was paid to settle the examination. The Company recorded a tax benefit of $545 relating to the settlement. No significant amounts of accrued interest or penalties were impacted by the settlement. The Company is subject to examination for its state tax returns for years 2013 and forward, with the exception of certain net operating losses and credit carryforwards originating in years prior to 2013 that remain subject to adjustment.
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Beginning of year balance$43
 $613
 $613
Additions for tax positions of prior years130
 2
 
Additions for tax positions of the current year12
 21
 
Reduction for prior year tax positions
 (48) 
Reductions for settlements
 (545) 
End of year balance$185
 $43

$613

For each period presented, substantially all of the amount of unrecognized benefits (excluding interest and penalties) would impact the effective tax rate, if recognized. The Company reasonably expects that the amount of unrecognized tax benefit will not decrease by a significant amount in the next 12 months.

The Company has been audited for United States income tax purposes through tax year 2013, resulting in no significant adjustments. No significant amounts of accrued interest or penalties were impacted by the adjustments through tax year 2013. All tax years after 2014 remain open to examination. The Company is subject to examination for its state tax returns for years 2014 and forward, with the exception of certain net operating losses and credit carryforwards originating in years prior to 2014 that remain subject to adjustment.

        


NOTE 7:EQUITY AND EPS

Dividend and Dividend Equivalent information by quarter for 2016, 2015, and 2014 is detailed below:
Dividend and Dividend Equivalent Information (per Share and Unit)
Declaration date Payment date Declared Paid Total payment
2016        
March 7, 2016 April 14, 2016 $0.08
 $0.08
 $1,378
August 1, 2016 September 8, 2016 0.02
 0.02
 344
October 31, 2016 December 8, 2016 0.02
 0.02
 344
    $0.12
 $0.12
 $2,066
2015        
March 10, 2015 April 21, 2015 $0.06
 $0.06
 $1,087
2014        
February 28, 2014 April 9, 2014 $0.05
 $0.05
 $907

See Note 18 for a dividend declaration made in 2017.

Capital Stock

Stock. Common Stockholders are entitled to elect four of the nine members of the Board of Directors, while Preferred Stockholders are entitled to elect the remaining five members. All directors are elected annually for a one year term. Any vacancies on the Board are to be filled only by the stockholdersshareholders and not by the Board. Stockholders holdingShareholders who own 10 percent or more of the outstanding Common or Preferred Stock have the right to call a special meeting of stockholders. Common Stockholders are not entitled to vote with respect to a merger, dissolution, lease, exchange or sale of substantially all of the Company’s assets, or on an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation, unless such action would increase or decrease the authorized shares or par value of the Common or Preferred Stock, or change the powers, preferences or special rights of the Common or Preferred Stock so as to affect the Common Stockholders adversely. Generally, Common Stockholders and Preferred Stockholders vote as separate classes on all other matters requiring shareholder approval.
On January 3, 2012, the Company reorganized into a holding company structure.  In connection with this transaction, the new holding company was similarly structured in terms of number of shares of Common Stock and Preferred Stock, the articles of incorporation and officer and directors.  The Reorganization did not change the designations, rights, powers or preferences relative rights to holders of the Company's Preferred or Common Stock as described above.  Further, in connection with the Reorganization, the Company’s treasury shares were canceled, which also reduced the number of issued shares.  The Company had historically used this treasury stock for issuance of Common Stock under the Company’s share-based compensation plans.  With the retirement of these treasury shares, the Company reserved certain authorized shares for issuance of Common Stock under the share-based compensation plans that were active at that time. At December 31, 2016, reserved authorized shares remaining for issuance of Common Stock were 331,000 employee unvested RSUs under the Stock Incentive Plan of 2004 (the "2004 Plan") (see Note 9).

On September 1, 2015, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the purchase of 950,000 shares of common stock for $14,488 in a privately negotiated transaction with F2 SEA, Inc., an affiliate of SEACOR Holdings, Inc., pursuant to a Stock Repurchase Agreement. SEACOR Holdings, Inc. iswas the 70 percent owner of ICP, the Company's 30 percent equity method investment.investment until it was sold on July 3, 2017 (Note 3).




EPS

EPS. The computations of basic and diluted EPS is as follows:EPS:

Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Operations:    

    

Net income(a)
$31,184
 $26,191
 $23,675
$41,823
 $31,184
 $26,191
Less: Income attributable to participating securities (unvested shares and units) (b)
954
 873
 832
996
 954
 873
Net income attributable to common shareholders$30,230
 $25,318
 $22,843
$40,827
 $30,230
 $25,318

          
Share information:          
Basic weighted average common shares(c)
16,643,811
 17,123,556
 17,305,866
Incremental shares from potential dilutive securities (d)

 
 
Diluted weighted average common shares16,643,811
 17,123,556
 17,305,866
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares(c)(d)
16,746,731
 16,643,811
 17,123,556

    

    

Basic and diluted EPS(e)
$1.82

$1.48

$1.32
Basic and diluted EPS(d)
$2.44

$1.82

$1.48

(a) 
Net income attributable to all shareholders.
(b) 
Participating securities includeincluded unvested restricted stock of 0, 128,500,0, and 278,900 unvested restricted stock128,500 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014,2015, as well as RSUs of 368,492, 527,486, 437,946, and 413,288 RSUs437,946 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, and 2014, respectively. Participating securities do not receive an allocation in periods when a loss is experienced.
(c) 
Under the two class method, basic weighted average common shares exclude outstanding unvested participating securities consisting of restricted stock awards of 0, 128,500, and 278,900 for 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.
securities.
(d) 
Potential dilutive securities have not been included in the EPS computation in a period when a loss is experienced. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had 0 stock options outstanding and potentially dilutive, respectively. At December 31, 2014, the Company had 4,000 stock options outstanding and potentially dilutive.
(e)
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares for 2016 and 2015 were affected by the September 1, 2015, purchase of 950,000 shares of common stock in a privately negotiated transaction with F2 SEA, Inc., an affiliate of SEACOR Holdings, Inc., pursuant to a Stock Repurchase Agreement. SEACOR Holdings, Inc. iswas the 70 percent owner of ICP, the Company's 30 percent equity method investment.
investment until it was sold on July 3, 2017 (Note 3).



        


Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss).Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by ComponentComponent:


Pension Plan Items
(a) 
Post-Employment Benefit Plan Items
Equity Method Investment Translation Adjustment and Post-Employment Benefit Adjustment
Total
Pension Plan Items
(a) 
Post-Employment Benefit Plan Items
Other
Total
Balance, December 31, 2013
$(377)
$390

$(17)
$(4)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications 218
 (1,620) (15) (1,417)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (85) 774
 
 689
Net 2014 other comprehensive income (loss) 133

(846)
(15)
(728)
Balance, December 31, 2014 $(244)
$(456)
$(32)
$(732) $(244)
$(456)
$(32)
$(732)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications (355) 47
 (10) (318) (355) 47
 (10) (318)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income 599
 (101) 52
 550
 599
 (101) 52
 550
Net 2015 other comprehensive income (loss) 244
 (54) 42
 232
 244
 (54) 42
 232
Balance, December 31, 2015 $
 $(510) $10
 $(500) $
 $(510) $10
 $(500)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications 
 113
 (14) 99
 
 113
 (14) 99
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income 
 21
 7
 28
 
 21
 7
 28
Net 2016 other comprehensive income (loss) 
 134
 (7) 127
 
 134
 (7) 127
Balance, December 31, 2016 $
 $(376) $3
 $(373) $
 $(376) $3
 $(373)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications 
 181
 (8) 173
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income 
 (115) 4
 (111)
Net 2017 other comprehensive income (loss) 
 66
 (4) 62
Balance, December 31, 2017 $
 $(310) $(1) $(311)

(a) 
The Company's pension benefit plans were terminated as of the quarter endedin June 2015.


Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for 2017:
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Components Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Affected Line Item in the Consolidated Statements of Income Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) 
Post Employment Benefit Items:      
Amortization of prior service cost $(338) 
(a) 
 $(339) 
(a) 
Recognized net actuarial loss 269
 
(a) 
 184
 
(a) 
 (69) Total before tax (155) 
 90
 Tax expense 40
 Tax expense
 $21
 Net of tax $(115) Net of tax
Equity Method Investment Adjustment:      
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation $13
  $7
 
 (6) Tax benefit (3) Tax benefit
 $7
 Net of tax $4
 Net of tax
Reclassifications for 2016 $28
 Total net of tax
Reclassifications for 2017 $(111) Total net of tax

(a) 
These accumulated other comprehensive income components are included in the computation of net period post-employment benefit cost. See Note 9for additional details.
cost (Note 9).
        


NOTE 8:COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
 
Commitments

Commitments. The following table provides informationCompany leases railcars and other assets under various operating leases.  For railcar leases, the Company is generally required to pay all service costs associated with the railcars.  Rental payments include minimum rentals plus contingent amounts based on all amountsmileage.  Rental expenses under operating leases with terms longer than one month were $2,372, $2,561, and payments of$2,283 for the Company's contractual obligations/commitments atyears ended December 31, 2016:
 Payments due by period
 Total Less than 1 year 1-3 years 4-5 years More than 5 years
Long term debt$2,324
 $358
 $758
 $816
 $392
Interest on Long term debt267
 80
 119
 61
 7
Operating leases9,700
 3,397
 2,936
 2,374
 993
Post-employment benefit plan obligations3,948
 502
 1,024
 957
 1,465
Purchase commitments80,274
 76,380
(a) 
3,634
 260
 
Total$96,513
 $80,717
 $8,471
 $4,468
 $2,857
(a) Includes open purchase order commitments related to raw materials2017, 2016, and packaging used in the ordinary course of business of $73,334.2015, respectively.


The Company's future operating lease commitments atminimum rental payments are $3,677; $1,850; $2,182; $1,326; and $942 for the years ending December 31, 2016 are as follows:
Years ending December 31, 
2017$3,397
20181,611
20191,325
20201,287
20211,087
Thereafter993
Total$9,700
2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively.

Contingencies
Contingencies. There are various legal and regulatory proceedings involving the Company and its subsidiaries.  The companyCompany accrues estimated costs for a contingency when management believes that a loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated.
 
On December 21, 2016, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) issued a Notice of Violation to the Company alleging the Company commenced construction of new aging warehouses for whiskey at its facility in Lawrenceburg, Indiana, without first applying for or obtaining a Clean Air Act permit and without adequately demonstrating to the EPA that emissions control equipment did not need to be installed to meet applicable air quality standards. The Company notes that neither EPA nor the State of Indiana have required emission control equipment for aging whiskey warehouses and, to our knowledge, no other distillers in the U.S. have been required to install emissions control equipment in their aging whiskey warehouses. No demand for a penalty has been made in connection with the Notice of Violation, but the Company believes it is probable that a penalty will be assessed. Although it is not possible to reasonably estimate a loss or range of loss at the date of this filing, the Company currently does not expect that the amount of any such penalty or related remedies would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.



A chemical release occurred at the Company's Atchison facility on October 21, 2016, which resulted in emissions venting into the air.  The Company reported the event to the EPA, OSHAEnvironmental Protection Agency ("EPA"), the Occupational, Safety, and Health Administration ("OSHA"), and to Kansas and local authorities on that date, and is cooperating fully to investigate and ensure that all appropriate response actions are taken.  The Company has also engaged outside experts to assist the investigation and response.  The Company believes it is probable that a fine or penalty may be imposed by one or more regulatory authorities, but it is currently unable to reasonably estimate the amount thereof since thesome investigations are not complete and cancould take several months and up to a few years to complete.  Private plaintiffs have initiated, and additional private plaintiffs may initiate, legal proceedings for damages resulting from the emission, but the Company is currently unable to reasonably estimate the amount of any such damages that might result.  The Company's insurance is expected to provide coverage of any damages to private plaintiffs, subject to a deductible of $250, but certain regulatory fines or penalties may not be covered and there can be no assurance to the amount or timing of possible insurance recoveries if ultimately claimed by the Company.  There was no significant damage to the Company's Atchison plant as a result of this incident.  No other MGP facilities, including the distillery in Lawrenceburg, Indiana, were affected by this incident.

The TTB performed a federal excise tax auditOSHA completed its investigation and, on April 19, 2017, issued its penalty to the Company in the amount of $138.  Management settled this assessment with OSHA in full for $75, which was paid on May 16, 2017. A portion, or all, of the Company’s subsidiaries, MGPI of Indiana, LLC and MGPI Processing, Inc., for the periods January 1, 2012 through July 31, 2015 and January 1, 2013 through July 31, 2015, respectively.  TTBpenalty amount may be covered by insurance.

The EPA informed the Company on August 1, 2017, that it would be assessingintends to seek civil penalties of approximately $250 in connection with its investigation, while offering the Company the opportunity to settle the matter prior to the EPA proceeding with a penalty asformal enforcement action. The Company is seeking a resultnegotiated settlement with the EPA, but negotiations have paused pending resolution of the audit, andEPA's criminal investigation. Since the Company offeredexpects a settlement fornegotiated resolution of the penalty.  The settlement has been accepted in principle by the TTBEPA civil case and the expensed amount is insignificantEPA-proposed civil penalties are not material to the Company’s financialyear ended December 31, 2017, the Company has not included an accrual in its results. A portion, or all, of the settled penalty amount may be covered by insurance.


NOTE 9:EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
 
401(k) Plans.  The Company has established 401(k) plans covering all employees after certain eligibility requirements are met.  Amounts charged to operations for employer contributions related to the plans totaled $1,299, $1,097, and $1,032 for 2017, 2016, and $1,029 for 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.
 


Pension Benefits.  The Company and its subsidiaries provided defined retirement benefits to certain employees covered under collective bargaining agreements.  Under the collective bargaining agreements, the Company’s pension funding contributions were determined as a percentage of wages paid. The funding was divided between the defined benefit plans and a union 401(k) plan. It was management’s policy to fund the defined benefit plans in accordance with the collective bargaining agreements.  The collective bargaining agreements allowed the plans’ trustees to develop changes to the pension plans to allow benefits to match funding, including reductions in benefits.  The benefits under these pension plans were based upon years of qualified credited service; however, benefit accruals under the defined benefit plans were frozen in 2009. In April 2015, the Company received approval from the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation to terminate the pension plans for employees covered under collective bargaining agreements. The funding by the Company to terminate the plans was $741 and was recognized when the pension plan settlement was fully executed induring the quarter ended June 30, 2015.

Post-Employment Benefits.  The Company sponsors life insurance coverage as well as medical benefits, including prescription drug coverage, to certain retired employees and their spouses.  During the year ended December 31,In 2014, the Company made a change to the plan to terminate post-employment health care and life insurance benefits for all union employees except for a specified grandfathered group.  At December 31, 20162017 the plan covered 196177 participants, both active and retired.  The post-employment health care benefit is contributory for spouses under certain circumstances.  Otherwise, participant contribution premiums are not required.  The health care plan contains fixed deductibles, co-pays, coinsurance, and out-of-pocket limitations.  The life insurance segment of the plan is noncontributory and is available to retirees only.
 
The Company funds the post-employment benefit on a pay-as-you-go basis, and there are no assets that have been segregated and restricted to provide for post-employment benefits.  Benefit eligibility for the current remaining grandfathered active group (27(25 employees) is age 62 and five years of service. The Company pays claims and premiums as they are submitted.  The Company provides varied levels of benefits to participants depending upon the date of retirement and the location in which the employee worked.  An older group of grandfathered retirees receives lifetime health care coverage.  All other retirees receive coverage to age 65 through continuation of the Company group medical plan and a lump sum advance premium to the MediGap carrier of the retiree’s choice.  Life insurance is available over the lifetime of the retiree in all cases.

The Company bases its post-employment plan valuation on The Society of Actuaries released its final reportsRPH-2014 Adjusted to 2006 Total Dataset Headcount-weighted Mortality with Scale MP-2017 Full Generational Improvement ("MP-2017 scale").  Based on the 2017 update, the MP-2017 scale reflects a lower level of the pension plan RP-2014 Mortality Tables and the Mortality Improvement Scale MP-2014 on October 27, 2014.improvement resulting in shorter assumed life spans. The impact of this change in assumed mortality on post-employment benefits liability was included in the Company's post-employment plan valuation for the2017, and using previous year ended December 31, 2014.



On October 8, 2015, The Society of Actuaries released an updated mortality improvement scalescales, for pension plans that incorporates two additional years of Social Security mortality data that have been recently released. The updated scale - MP-2015 - reflects a trend toward somewhat smaller improvements in longevity. The impact of this change in assumed mortality on post-employment benefits liability was included in the Company's post-employment plan valuation for the year ended December 31,2016, and 2015.

The Company’s measurement date is December 31.  The Company expects to contribute approximately $520,$486, net of $18$15 of Medicare Part D subsidy receipts, to the plan in 2017.2018.

The status of the Company’s plans at December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014 was as follows:2015:
Pension Benefit Plans Post-Employment Benefit Plan 
Pension Benefit Plans(a)
 Post-Employment Benefit Plan 
December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31, 
2015
(a) 
2014  2016 2015 2014 2015 2017 2016 2015 
Change in benefit obligation:                  
Beginning of year$2,016
 $2,190
 $4,681
 $4,926
 $4,827
 $2,016
 $4,106
 $4,681
 $4,926
 
Service cost
 
 36
 51
 72
 
 25
 36
 51
 
Interest cost36
 87
 142
 141
 149
 36
 122
 142
 141
 
Actuarial loss (gain)(9) 35
 (297) 45
 1,632
 (9) (261) (297) 45
 
Negative plan amendment benefit
 
 
 
 (1,183) 
Benefits paid(2,043) (296)  (456) (482) (571) (2,043) (388) (456) (482) 
Benefit obligation at end of year$

$2,016
  $4,106
 $4,681

$4,926
 $
 $3,604
 $4,106

$4,681
 

(a) The Company's pension benefit plans were terminated and paid as of June 2015.


The following table shows the change in plan assets:
        
 Pension Benefit Plans 
 December 31, 
 2015
(a) 
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year$1,300
 
Actual return on plan assets2
 
Employer contributions741
 
Benefits paid(2,043) 
Fair value of plan assets at end of year$
 

(a)The Company's pension benefit plans were terminated and paid as of June 2015.


Assumptions used to determine accumulated benefit obligations as of the year end were:end:
 
 Pension Benefit Plans  Post-Employment Benefit Plan 
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2015
(a) 
 2016 2015 
Discount rate3.65%  3.15% 3.20% 
Measurement date
December 31, 2015(b)
  December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 

(a)
The Company's pension benefit plans were terminated and paid as of June 2015.
(b)
The measurement date was June 30, 2015 for termination liabilities in 2015.



 Post-Employment Benefit Plan 
 Year Ended December 31, 
 2017 2016 
Discount rate2.96% 3.15% 
Measurement dateDecember 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 

Assumptions used to determine net benefit cost (benefit) for 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014 were:2015:
Pension Benefit Plans Post-Employment Benefit Plan Post-Employment Benefit Plan
Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
2015
(a) 
2014 2016 2015 2014  2017 2016 2015 
Expected return on Assets7.00% 7.00% 
 
 
  
 
 
 
Discount rate3.58% 4.11% 3.20% 2.99% 3.95 / 3.39%
(b) 3.15% 3.20% 2.99% 
Average compensation increasen/a n/a n/a n/a n/a  N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 

(a)
The Company's pension benefit plans were terminated and paid as of June 2015.
(b)
The pension benefit plan was amended effective April 16, 2014 requiring a re-measurement valuation. The discount rate for 2014 was based on measurement dates of December 31, 2013 and April 16, 2014.
 
The discount rate refers to the interest rate used to discount the estimated future benefit payments to their present value, referred to as the benefit obligation. The Company determines the discount rate using a yield curve of high quality fixed income investments whose cash flows match the timing and amount of the Company’s expected benefit payments. Prior to the plans' termination, the discount rate allowed the Company to estimate what it would cost to settle pension obligations as of the measurement date. 

In determining the expected rate of return on assets, the Company considers its historical experience in the plan's investment portfolio, historical market data and long-term historical relationships, as well as a review of other objective indices including current market factors such as inflation and interest rates.

Components of net benefit cost are as follows:(benefit):
Pension Benefit Plans Post-Employment Benefit Plan 
Pension Benefit Plans(a)
 Post-Employment Benefit Plan 
Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31, 
2015
(a) 
2014 2016 2015 2014 2015 2017 2016 2015 
Service cost$
 $
 $36
 $51
 $72
 $
 $25
 $36
 $51
 
Interest cost36
 87
 142
 141
 149
 36
 122
 142
 141
 
Expected return on assets(45) (104) 
 
 
 (45) 
 
 
 
Amortization of prior service cost
 
 (338) (338) (369) 
 (339) (338) (338) 
Recognized net actuarial loss25
 21
 269
 278
 18
 25
 184
 269
 278
 
Settlement losses414
 50
 
 
 
 414
 
 
 
 
Net benefit cost$430

$54
 $109
 $132

$(130) 
Net benefit cost (benefit)$430
 $(8) $109

$132
 

(a)
(a)The Company's pension benefit plans were terminated and paid as of June 2015.
The Company's pension benefit plans were terminated and paid as of June 2015.

        


Changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income are as follows:income:
 Pension Benefit Plans Post-Employment Benefit Plan
 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2015
(a) 
2014 2016 2015 2014
Net actuarial (loss) gain$(35) $(92) $293
 $(35) $(1,632)
Settlement losses414
 50
 
 
 
Plan amendment and curtailment
 
 
 
 1,183
Recognized net actuarial loss25
 20
 269
 278
 18
Amortization of prior service cost
 
 (338) (338) (369)
Recognition of prior service cost due to curtailments
 
 
 
 (52)
Total other comprehensive income (loss), pre-tax404

(22) 224
 (95)
(852)
    Income tax expense (benefit)160
 (155) 90
 (41) (6)
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax$244

$133

$134
 $(54)
$(846)

(a)
The Company's pension benefit plans were terminated and paid as of June 2015.

 
Pension Benefit Plans(a)
 Post-Employment Benefit Plan
 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2015 2017 2016 2015
Net actuarial (loss) gain$(35) $261
 $293
 $(35)
Settlement losses414
 
 
 
Recognized net actuarial loss25
 184
 269
 278
Amortization of prior service cost
 (339) (338) (338)
Total other comprehensive income (loss), pre-tax404
 106
 224

(95)
    Income tax expense (benefit)160
 40
 90
 (41)
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax$244

$66
 $134

$(54)

Amounts(a)The Company's pension benefit plans were terminated and paid as of June 2015.

Benefit obligation recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows:Sheets:
 Pension Benefit Plans Post-Employment Benefit Plan
 As of December 31, As of December 31,
 2015
(a) 
2016 2015
Accrued expenses$
 $(502) $(545)
Accrued retirement benefits
 (3,604) (4,136)
Net amount recognized$
 $(4,106) $(4,681)

(a)
The Company's pension benefit plans were terminated and paid as of June 2015.

 Post-Employment Benefit Plan 
 As of December 31, 
Benefit obligation2017 2016 
Current$(471) $(502) 
Non-Current(3,133) (3,604) 
Net amount recognized$(3,604) $(4,106) 

The estimated amount that will be recognized from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into net periodic benefit cost during the year ended December 31, 2017 is as follows:2018:
 
 Post-Employment Benefit Plan
(a) 
Actuarial net loss$(184) 
Net prior service credits338
 
Net amount recognized$154
 

(a)
The Company's pension benefit plans were terminated and paid as of June 2015.



 Post-Employment Benefit Plan 
Actuarial net loss$(92) 
Net prior service credits37
 
Net amount recognized$(55) 

The assumed average annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered benefits (health care cost trend rate) is as follows::
 
Post-Employment Benefit PlanPost-Employment Benefit Plan
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 20152017 2016
Group Plan Lifetime Prescription Cost Medicare Supplement Group Plan Lifetime Prescription Cost Medicare SupplementGroup Plan Lifetime Prescription Cost Medicare Supplement Group Plan Lifetime Prescription Cost Medicare Supplement
Health care cost trend rate7.50% 9.00% 5.00% 7.50% 9.00% 5.00%7.00% 9.00% 4.50% 7.50% 9.00% 5.00%
Ultimate trend rate5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%5.00% 5.00% 4.50% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%
Year rate reaches ultimate trend rate2023
 2024
 2017
 2024
 2025
 2017
2025
 2027
 2018
 2023
 2024
 2017

A one percentage point increase (decrease) in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have increased (decreased) the accumulated benefit obligation by $124$98 ($116)93) at December 31, 2016,2017 and the service and interest cost would have increased (decreased) by $6$5 ($6)4) for the year ended December 31, 2016.2017.
 


As of December 31, 2016,2017, the following expected benefit payments (net of Medicare Part D subsidiary for Post-Employment Benefit Plan Payments), and the related expected subsidy receipts that reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid to plan participants:
 
Post-Employment Benefit Plan
(a) 
Post-Employment Benefit Plan 
Expected Benefit
Payments
 
Expected Subsidy
Receipts
 
Expected Benefit
Payments
 
Expected Subsidy
Receipts
 
2017$520
 $18
 
2018522
 17
 $486
 $15
 
2019534
 15
 491
 13
 
2020505
 14
 469
 11
 
2021479
 13
 443
 11
 
2022-20261,509
 44
 
2022418
 9
 
2023-20271,221
 30
 
Total$4,069
 $121
 $3,528
 $89
 

(a)
The Company's pension benefit plans were terminated and paid as of June 2015.
(b)
This expected pay out schedule considers the termination of the pension benefit plan during 2015.

Share-Based Compensation Plans.  As of December 31, 2016,2017, the Company was authorized to issue 40,000,000 shares of Common Stock and had a treasury share balance of 1,457,2001,318,545 at December 31, 2016.2017.

The Company currently has two active share-based compensation plans: the Employee Equity Incentive Plan of 2014 (the "2014 Plan") and the Non-Employee Director Equity Incentive Plan (the "Directors' Plan"). The plans were approved by shareholders at the Company's annual meeting in May 2014. The 2014 Plan replaced the 2004 Plan. See a detailDetail of activities in both plans follows below.

The Company’s share-based compensation plans provide for the awarding of stock options, stock appreciation rights, and shares of restricted stock and RSUs for senior executives and salaried employees, as well as for outside directors.  Compensation expense related to restricted stock awards is based on the market price of the stock on the date the Board of Directors communicates the approved award and is amortized over the vesting period of the restricted stock award. The Consolidated Statements of Income for 2017, 2016, 2015, and 20142015 reflect total share-based compensation costs and director fees for awarded grants of $2,245, $2,402, $1,414, $930, respectively, related to these plans.

The Company elected to early adopt the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.Accounting in the quarter ended September 30, 2016. The provision of this ASU related to share-based compensation award forfeitures had no impact on the Company’s beginning of year retained earnings for 2016 and no impact for the 2016 year of adoption since it elected to continue to estimate forfeitures rather than account for them as they occur (see Note 6 for additional detail related to the ASU No. 2016-09 adoption).occur.



For long-term incentive awards to be granted in the form of RSUs in 20172018 based on 20162017 results, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee ("HRCC") determined that the grants would have performance conditions that would be based on the same performance metrics as the Short-Term Incentive Plan (the "STI Plan"). The performance metrics are operating income, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization ("EBITDA"), and EPS. Because management determined at the beginning of 20162017 that the performance metrics would most likely be met, or exceeded, amortization of the estimated dollar pool of RSUs to be awarded based on 20162017 results was started in the first quarter over an estimated 48 month period, including 12 months to the grant date and an additional 36 months to the vesting date. The Consolidated Statements of Income for 2017, 2016, 2015, and 20142015 reflects share-based compensation costs for grants to be awarded of $491, $317, $482, and $0,$482, respectively.

At the Company's annual meeting in May 2014, shareholders also approved a new Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "ESPP Plan") with 300,000 shares registered for employee purchase. The ESPP planPlan is not active at this time.
Randall M. Schrick, the The Company's Vice President of Production and Engineering, retired effective December 31, 2015. Mr. Schrick is providing consulting services to the Company, as needed, under the terms of a consulting agreement entered into with the Company on June 23, 2015, and amended on September 1, 2015 (the "Consulting Agreement"). The initial term of the Consulting Agreement is January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018, and, under the Consulting Agreement, Mr. Schrick provides consulting with respect to such business matters as he previously provided services as an employee. During the term of the Consulting Agreement and for an eighteen month period thereafter, Mr. Schrick is subject to customary noncompetition, customer and supplier nonsolicitation andformer employee nonsolicitation restrictions. In recognition of Mr. Schrick's service, the Company elected to continue the vesting of his shares of Restricted Stock and RSUs on their original vesting schedules, which extend beyond Mr. Schrick's intended retirement date. The Company determined that Mr. Schrick's retirement announcement resultedstock purchase plan continued in a modification of his unvested equity awards. Accordingly, the recognition of the remaining associated compensation expense of $195 was accelerated and fully recognized over the period beginning with the measurement date of the modification, June 23, 2015, through December 31, 2015, Mr. Schrick's retirement date. Associated compensation expense is reflected in Selling, general and administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Mr. Schrick's unvested awards on the modification date were 16,500 shares of Restricted Stock and 29,941 RSUs. Remaining at December 31, 2016 were 29,941 RSUs.use until its termination during 2017.

2014 Plan

The 2014 Plan, with 1,500,000 shares registered for future grants, provides that vesting occurs pursuant to the time period specified in the particular award agreement approved for that issuance of RSUs, which is to be not less than three years unless vesting is accelerated due to the occurrence of certain events. As of December 31, 2016, 236,0692017, 280,075 RSUs had been granted of the 1,500,000 shares approved for under the 2014 Plan.



Directors' Plan

The Director's Plan, with 300,000 shares registered for future grants, provides that vesting occurs pursuant to the time period specified in the particular award agreement approved for that issuance of equity.  As of December 31, 2016, 54,2482017, 64,035 shares were granted of the 300,000 shares approved for grants under the Directors' Plan and all 54,24864,035 shares were vested.

2004 Plan
 
Under the 2004 Plan, as amended, the Company granted incentives (including stock options and restricted stock awards) for up to 2,680,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock to salaried, full time employees, including executive officers.  The term of each award generally was determined by the committee of the Board of Directors charged with administering the 2004 Plan.  Under the terms of the 2004 Plan, any options granted were non-qualified stock options, exercisable within ten years and had an exercise price of not less than the fair value of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of the grant.  As of December 31, 2016,2017, no stock options and no unvested restricted stock shares (net of forfeitures) remained outstanding under the 2004 Plan.  As of December 31, 2016, noNo future grants can be made under the 2004 Plan.
 


In connection with the Reorganization, the 2004 Plan was amended to provide for grants in the form of RSUs.  The awards entitle participants to receive shares of stock following the end of a five year vesting period.  Full or pro-rata accelerated vesting generally might occur upon a "change in the ownership" of the Company or the subsidiary for which a participant performed services, a "change in effective control" of the Company or a "change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets" of the Company (in each case, generally as defined in the Treasury regulations under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code), or if employment of a participant is terminated as a result of death, disability, retirement or termination without cause.  Participants have no voting of dividend rights under the awards that were granted; however, the awards provide for payment of dividend equivalents when dividends are paid to stockholders.  As of December 31, 2016, 331,0002017, 145,000 unvested RSUs remained under the 2004 Plan.  As of December 31, 2016,2017, no RSU awards were available for future grants under the 2004 Plan.
 
On August 8, 2013, the Board of Directors approved modification of certain provisions related to vesting for all restricted stock and restricted unit awards that were awarded under the 2004 Plan. The modifications provided that a pro-rata portion of each restricted stock and RSU award granted under the 2004 Plan would, in addition to vesting in accordance with the terms previously provided therein, vest with respect to a pro-rata portion of such grant, upon the occurrence of the Employment Agreement Change in Control.  The modification applies to all employee restricted stock awards and RSU holders, not just executive officers.  The modification also provided that all restricted stock awards and RSUs previously awarded to employees shall vest, to the maximum extent provided under the terms of the prior restricted stock award and RSU award guidelines, upon the termination of employment by the Company without cause (as determined in the modification).
Directors’ Stock Plan

Under the Directors’ Stock Plan, which was approved by stockholders at the 2006 annual meeting, as amended, the Company could grant incentives for up to 175,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock to outside directors.  The plan allowed for grants to be made on the first business day following the date of each annual meeting of stockholders, whereby each non-employee director was awarded restricted stock with a fair market valueas determined on the first business day following the annual meeting.  The shares awarded became fully vested upon the occurrence of one of the following events  (1) the third anniversary of the award date, (2) the death of the director, or (3) a change in control, as defined in the Plan.  The HRCC could allow accelerated vesting in the event of specified terminations.
In connection with the Reorganization, the Directors’ Stock Plan was amended to provide for grants in the form of RSUs instead of restricted stock.  The awards entitled participants to receive shares of stock following the end of a three year vesting period.  Participants had no voting or dividend rights under the awards that were granted; however, the awards provided for payment of dividend equivalents when dividends were paid to stockholders. By approval of the Company's Board of Directors on December 16, 2014, the vesting of all unvested RSUs was accelerated and occurred on that date.  As of December 31, 2016, no awards were available for future grants under the Directors’ Stock Plan. 
A summary of the status of stock options awarded under the Company’s share-based compensation plans for 2015 and 2014 is presented below: 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2015 2014
 
 
Shares

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
 
Shares

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Outstanding at beginning of year4,000
 $10.45
 10,000
 $9.91
Granted
 
 
 
Canceled/Forfeited
 
 
 
Exercised4,000
 17.09
 6,000
 9.54
Outstanding at end of year
 $
 4,000
 $10.45

At December 31, 2016, the aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding and exercisable was zero since there were no remaining stock options outstanding.




Restricted Stock.  A summarySummary of the status ofunvested restricted stock awarded under the Company’s share-based compensation plans for 2016 2015, and 2014 is presented below:2015. There was no unvested restricted stock under the Company's share-based compensation plans in 2017. 
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142016 2015
 
 
 
Shares
 Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
  
 
 
Shares
 Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
 
 
 
 
Shares
 
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
 
 
 
Shares
 Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
 
 
 
 
Shares
 
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Unvested balance at beginning of year128,500
 $5.85
 278,900
 $6.28
 569,296
 $5.26
128,500
 $5.85
 278,900
 $6.28
Granted
 
 13,585
 17.02
 58,669
 4.42

 
 13,585
 17.02
Forfeited
 
 (30,800) 6.27
 (206,282) 4.59

 
 (30,800) 6.27
Vested(128,500) 5.85
 (133,185) 7.80
 (142,783) 3.87
(128,500) 5.85
 (133,185) 7.80
Unvested balance at end of year
 $
 128,500

$5.85
 278,900
 $6.28


$
 128,500
 $5.85

During 2016 2015, and 2014,2015, the total fair value of restricted stock awards vested was $752, $1,038, and $552,$1,038, respectively.  As of December 31, 2016, there was no unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted stock awards.



Restricted Stock Units.RSUs.  A summarySummary of the status ofunvested RSUs awarded under the Company’s share-based compensation plans for 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014 is presented below:2015: 
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31, 
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015 
Units Weighted Average
 Grant-Date Fair
Value
 
 
 
Units

Weighted Average
 Grant-Date Fair
Value
 
 
 
Units

Weighted Average
 Grant-Date Fair
Value
Units Weighted Average
 Grant-Date Fair
Value
 Units Weighted Average
 Grant-Date Fair
Value
 
 
 
Units

Weighted Average
 Grant-Date Fair
Value
 
Unvested balance at beginning of year437,946
 $7.09
 413,288
 $5.09
 371,502
 $4.34
527,486
 $10.17
 437,946
 $7.09
 413,288
 $5.09
 
Granted100,892
 23.15
 89,702
 16.63
 247,463
 5.83
47,514
 42.93
 100,892
 23.15
 89,702
 16.63
 
Forfeited(11,352) 11.55
 (54,506) 6.15
 (135,104) 4.60
(3,508) 25.74
 (11,352) 11.55
 (54,506) 6.15
 
Vested
 
 (10,538) 14.88
 (70,573) 3.22
(203,000) 4.82
 
 
 (10,538) 14.88
 
Unvested balance at end of year527,486
 $10.17
 437,946
 $7.09
 413,288
 $5.09
368,492
 $17.20
 527,486
 $10.17
 437,946
 $7.09
 

During 2017, 2016, 2015, and 20142015, the total fair value of RSU awards vested was $979, $0, $157 and $227,$157, respectively. As of December 31, 20162017 there was $1,879$3,036 of total estimated unrecognized compensation costs (net of estimated forfeitures) related to granted RSU awards.  These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.71.5 years.

Upon their vesting, we purchased restricted stock and RSUs from employees to cover associated withholding taxes. Total treasury stock purchases added 74,132 shares or $4,663 in 2017; 40,870 shares or $1,518 in 2016; and 60,135 shares or $920 in 2015.

Annual Cash Incentive PlanPlan. . Effective January 1, 2014, the Company adopted a new STI Plan to replace its 2012 Cash Incentive Program. The STI Plan is designed to motivate and retain the Company's officers and employees and tie short-term incentive compensation to achievement of certain profitability goals by the Company. Pursuant to the STI Plan, short-term incentive compensation is dependent on the achievement of certain performance metrics by the Company, established by the Board of Directors. Each performance metric is calculated in accordance with the rules approved by the HRCC, which may adjust the results to eliminate unusual items. For 2017, the performance metrics were operating income, EBITDA, and EPS. For 2016, the performance metrics were operating income, EBITDA, and EPS. For 2015, the performance metrics were operating income, barreled distillate put away, and ICP equity. For 2014, the performance metrics were operating income, EBITDA, and EPS.equity income. Operating income for the performance metric was defined as reported GAAP operating income adjusted for certain discretionary items as determined by the Company's management ("adjusted operating income"). For 2014, adjusted operating income was determined to be operating income less insurance recoveries for property damage, net of the book value of property loss, received during the year. EBITDA and EPS were detailed in the Company's Proxy Statement for the 2016 annual meeting of shareholders. The HRCC determines the officers and employees eligible to participate under the STI Plan for the plan year as well as the target annual incentive compensation for each participant for each plan year.

Amounts expensed under the STI Plan totaled $5,150, $3,394, and $4,964 for 2017, 2016, and $3,166 for 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.



NOTE 10:CONCENTRATIONS

Significant customerscustomers..  For 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014,2015, the Company had no sales to an individual customer that accounted for more than 10 percent of consolidated net sales.  During the years 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014,2015, the Company’s ten largest customers accounted for approximately 39 percent, 36 percent, 42 percent, and 4642 percent of consolidated net sales, respectively.

Significant suppliers.For 2017, the Company had purchases from two grain suppliers that approximated 29 percent of consolidated purchases. In addition, the Company's 10 largest suppliers accounted for approximately 65 percent of consolidated purchases.

For 2016, the Company had purchases from two grain suppliers that approximated 31 percent of consolidated purchases. In addition, the Company's 10 largest suppliers accounted for approximately 63 percent of consolidated purchases.

For 2015, the Company had purchases from two grain suppliers that approximated 31 percent of consolidated purchases.  In addition, the Company’s 10 largest suppliers accounted for approximately 75 percent of consolidated purchases.

For 2014, the Company had purchases from one grain supplier that approximated 35 percent of consolidated purchases.  In addition, the Company’s 10 largest suppliers accounted for approximately 70 percent of consolidated purchases.


NOTE 11:OPERATING SEGMENTS

At December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, the Company had two segments: distillery products and ingredient solutions. The distillery products segment consists of food grade alcohol and distillery co-products, such as distillers feed (commonly called dried distillers grain in the industry) and fuel grade alcohol. The distillery products segment also includes warehouse services, including barrel put away, barrel storage, and barrel retrieval services. Ingredient solutions consists of specialty starches and proteins and commodity starches and commodity proteins.

Operating profit for each segment is based on net sales less identifiable operating expenses.  Non-direct selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A"),&A, interest expense, earnings from the Company's equity method investments until sold on July 3, 2017, other special charges, and other general miscellaneous expenses are excluded from segment operations and are classified as Corporate.  Receivables, inventories, and equipment have been identified with the segments to which they relate.  All other assets are considered as Corporate.
 

Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Net sales to customers:    
Distillery products$291,008
 $265,243
 $270,225
Ingredient solutions56,440
 53,020
 57,379
Total(a)
$347,448
 $318,263
 $327,604

    

Gross profit:     
Distillery products$66,817
 $56,836
 $50,662
Ingredient solutions9,199
 8,447
 7,871
Total$76,016
 $65,283
 $58,533
      
Depreciation and amortization:    

Distillery products$8,490
 $8,371
 $8,900
Ingredient solutions1,660
 1,655
 2,111
Corporate1,158
 1,227
 1,371
Total$11,308
 $11,253
 $12,382

    

Income (loss) before income taxes:    

Distillery products$60,424
 $53,583
 $49,097
Ingredient solutions6,613
 5,836
 5,636
Corporate(14,279) (14,702) (16,315)
Total$52,758
 $44,717
 $38,418

(a)
Net sales revenue from foreign sources totaled $22,870, $22,422, and$18,772 for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, and is largely derived from Japan, Thailand, and Canada.  The balance of total net sales revenue is from domestic sources.
        



Year Ended December 31,December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016
Net sales to customers:    
Distillery products$265,243
 $270,225
 $256,561
Ingredient solutions53,020
 57,379
 56,842
Total$318,263
 $327,604
 $313,403

    

Gross profit:     
Distillery products56,836
 50,662
 22,332
Ingredient solutions8,447
 7,871
 6,099
Total$65,283
 $58,533
 $28,431
     
Depreciation and amortization:    

Identifiable Assets   
Distillery products$8,371
 $8,900
 $8,510
$191,321
 $161,059
Ingredient solutions1,655
 2,111
 2,316
28,950
 27,109
Corporate1,227
 1,371
 1,499
20,057
(a) 
37,168
Total$11,253
 $12,382
 $12,325

    

Income (loss) before income taxes:    

Distillery products$53,583
 $49,097
 $28,701
Ingredient solutions5,836
 5,636
 3,939
Corporate(14,702) (16,315) (6,700)
Total$44,717
 $38,418
 $25,940
Total(b)
$240,328

$225,336

 December 31,
 2016 2015
Identifiable Assets   
Distillery products$161,059
 $131,963
Ingredient solutions27,109
 24,023
Corporate37,168
 38,324
Total$225,336

$194,310


Revenue from foreign sources totaled $22,422, $18,772, and$16,306 for 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively, and is largely derived from Japan, Thailand, and Canada.  There is an immaterial amount of assets located in foreign countries.
(a) 
Reflects the 2017 sale of ICP, the Company's equity method investment (Note 3).
(b)
The Company has no assets located in foreign countries.

NOTE 12:SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Non-cash investing and financing activities:          
Purchase of property and equipment in accounts payable$4,364
 $1,784
 $574
Purchase of property, plant, and equipment in accounts payable$4,522
 $4,364
 $1,784
Additional cash payment information:    

     
Interest paid1,467
 818
 903
1,489
 1,467
 818
Income tax paid16,409
 9,393
 146
Income taxes paid13,526
 16,409
 9,393



NOTE 13:DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

Certain commodities the Company uses in its production process, are exposedor input costs, exposes it to market price risk due to volatility in the prices for those commodities.  TheThrough the Company's grain supply contracts for its Atchison and Lawrenceburg facilities, its wheat flour supply contract for the Atchison facility, and its Lawrenceburgnatural gas contracts for both facilities, it purchases grain, wheat flour, and Atchison facilities permits the Company to purchase grainnatural gas, respectively, for delivery upfrom one to 1224 months into the future at negotiated prices.  The pricing for these contracts is based on a formula using several factors.  The Company has determined that the firm commitments to purchase grain, wheat flour, and natural gas under the terms of theseits supply contracts meetmeets the normal purchases and sales exception as defined under ASCAccounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 815,  Derivatives and Hedging, and has excluded the fair value of these commitments from recognition within its consolidated financial statements until the actual contracts are physically settled.

The Company’s production process also involves the use of wheat flour and natural gas. The contracts for wheat flour and natural gas range from monthly contracts to multi-year supply arrangements; however, because the quantities involved have always beenare for amounts to be consumed within the normal expected production process, the Company has determined that these contracts meet the criteria for the normal purchases and sales exceptionand have excluded the fair value of these commitments from recognition within its consolidated financial statements until the actual contracts are physically settled. SeeNote 8 for a discussion of the Company’s direct material purchase commitments.process.

NOTE 14:RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Information related to the Company’s related party transactions is as follows:transactions:

Transactions with ICP and ICP HoldingsHoldings. On July 3, 2017, the Company completed the sale of its 30 percent equity ownership interest in ICP to Pacific Ethanol (Note 3).

The Company has various agreements with ICP and ICP Holdings, including a Contribution Agreement, an LLC Interest Purchase Agreement, and a Limited Liability Company Agreement.

As of December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, the Company recorded $3,349$0 and $2,291$3,349, respectively, of amounts due to ICP that arewere included in the Accountsaccounts payable to affiliate, net,, caption on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and purchased approximately $18,425, $29,596, $39,738 and $35,254$39,738, respectively, of product from ICP during 2017, 2016, and 2015, and 2014, respectively, that are included in the Costcost of sales caption on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

On June 28, 2017, the Company received a cash dividend distribution form ICP of $6,600, which was its 30 percent ownership share of the total distribution. The Company also received a distribution of $830 on June 30, 2017, which was its 30 percent ownership share of an additional distribution (Note 3).

On February 26, 2016, the Company received a cash dividend distribution from ICP of $3,300, which was its 30 percent ownership share of the total distribution (see Note 3). On December 4, 2014, the Company received a $4,835 cash dividend distribution from ICP.distribution.

        


NOTE 15:QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
 Year Ended December 31, 2017
 
Fourth
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
First
Quarter
Sales$91,043
 $87,852
 $87,892
 $91,345
Less: excise tax2,850
 1,519
 2,139
 4,176
Net sales88,193
 86,333
 85,753
 87,169
Cost of sales68,668
 67,708
 66,928
 68,128
    Gross profit19,525
 18,625
 18,825
 19,041
SG&A expenses8,993
 8,154
 8,311
 7,649
    Operating income10,532
 10,471
 10,514
 11,392
Gain on sale of equity method investment (Note 3)(a)

 11,381
 
 
Equity method investment earnings (loss) (Note 3)
 
 (819) 471
Interest expense, net(250) (224) (379) (331)
Income before income taxes10,282
 21,628
 9,316
 11,532
Income tax expense (benefit) (Note 6)(b)
(2,357) 7,491
 2,947
 2,854
Net income$12,639
 $14,137
 $6,369
 $8,678
        
Basic and diluted EPS data$0.74
 $0.82
 $0.37
 $0.50
        
Dividends and dividend equivalents per common share and per unit$0.04
 $0.89
 $0.04
 $0.04
(a)
Net income was positively impacted during the third quarter of 2017 by a gain on sale of equity method investment of $11,381 related to the sale of the Company's 30 percent interest in ICP to Pacific Ethanol on July 3, 2017 (Note 3).
(b)
Net income was positively impacted during the fourth quarter of 2017 by a provisional income tax benefit of $3,343 related to the Tax Act enacted on December 22, 2017 (Note 6).
(c)
Quarterly EPS amounts may not add to amounts for the year because quarterly and annual EPS calculations are performed separately.


 
Year Ended December 31, 2016(a) (b)
 
Fourth
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
First
Quarter
Sales$85,005
 $83,711
 $82,174
 $77,191
Less: excise tax3,860
 3,820
 1,782
 356
Net sales81,145
 79,891
 80,392
 76,835
Cost of sales63,560
 64,770
 64,861
 59,789
    Gross profit17,585
 15,121
 15,531
 17,046
Selling, general and administrative expenses6,987
 6,981
 6,404
 6,321
Other operating income, net
 (3,385) 
 
    Operating income10,598
 11,525
 9,127
 10,725
Equity in earnings (Note 3)1,776
 664
 1,079
 517
Interest expense(314) (341) (328) (311)
Income before income taxes12,060
 11,848
 9,878
 10,931
Income tax expense (Note 6)3,775
 2,316
 3,570
 3,872
Net income$8,285
 $9,532
 $6,308
 $7,059
        
Basic and diluted EPS data$0.48
 $0.55
 $0.37
 $0.41
        
Dividends per common share and per unit$0.02
 $0.02
 $
 $0.08

 
Year Ended December 31, 2016(a) (b)
 
Fourth
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
First
Quarter
Sales$85,005
 $83,711
 $82,174
 $77,191
Less: excise tax3,860
 3,820
 1,782
 356
Net sales81,145
 79,891
 80,392
 76,835
Cost of sales63,560
 64,770
 64,861
 59,789
    Gross profit17,585
 15,121
 15,531
 17,046
SG&A6,987
 6,981
 6,404
 6,321
Other operating income, net
 (3,385) 
 
    Operating income10,598
 11,525
 9,127
 10,725
Equity method investment earnings (Note 3)1,776
 664
 1,079
 517
Interest expense(314) (341) (328) (311)
Income before income taxes12,060
 11,848
 9,878
 10,931
Income tax expense (Note 6)3,775
 2,316
 3,570
 3,872
Net income$8,285
 $9,532
 $6,308
 $7,059
        
Basic and diluted EPS data$0.48
 $0.55
 $0.37
 $0.41
        
Dividends and dividend equivalents per common share and per unit$0.02
 $0.02
 $
 $0.08

(a) 
Net income was positively impacted during the third quarter of 2016 by other operating income, net, of $3,385 related to a legal settlement agreement and a gain on sale of long-lived assets and by a lower effective income tax rate related to the implementation of ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.
(b) 
Quarterly EPS amounts may not add to amounts for the year because quarterly and annual EPS calculations are performed separately.


 
Year Ended December 31, 2015(a) (b)
 
Fourth
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
First
Quarter
Sales$85,072
 $83,880
 $92,071
 $84,864
Less: excise tax3,563
 3,552
 6,717
 4,451
Net sales81,509
 80,328
 85,354
 80,413
Cost of sales65,754
 68,466
 67,826
 67,025
    Gross profit15,755
 11,862
 17,528
 13,388
Selling, general and administrative expenses5,681
 5,497
 8,025
 6,480
    Operating income10,074
 6,365
 9,503
 6,908
Equity in earnings (Note 3)92
 1,562
 3,096
 1,352
Interest expense(160) (114) (129) (131)
Income before income taxes10,006
 7,813
 12,470
 8,129
Income tax expense (Note 6)3,527
 1,042
 4,599
 3,059
Net income$6,479
 $6,771
 $7,871
 $5,070
        
Basic and diluted EPS data$0.38
 $0.38
 $0.44
 $0.28
        
Dividends per common share and per unit$
 $
 $
 $0.06

(a)
Net income was positively impacted during the second quarter of 2015 by $460 as result of an insurance recovery.
(b)
Net income was positively impacted during the third and fourth quarters of 2015 by $1,908 and $477, respectively, as result of a release of the valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets,

NOTE 16:PROPERTY AND BUSINESS INTERRUPTION INSURANCE CLAIMS AND RECOVERIES

During October 2016, the Company experienced a chemical release at its Atchison facility. The reaction resulted in emissions venting into the air. The appropriate regulatory agencies were notified and investigations continue. Injuries were reported and treated at area hospitals. The Company continues to work with its environmental insurance carrier on this claim (see Note 8).
During October 2014, the Company experienced a fire at its Atchison facility.  Certain equipment in the facility's feed drying operations was damaged, but repairable, and the Company experienced a seven day temporary loss of production. The Company reached final settlement with its insurance carrier to close this claim during the quarter ended March 31, 2015.

During January 2014, the Company experienced a fire at its Lawrenceburg facility.  The fire damaged certain equipment in the feed dryer house and caused a temporary loss of production. The fire did not impact the Company's own or customer owned warehoused inventory. In December 2014, the Company negotiated a final settlement with its insurance carrier to close this claim. As part of the settlement, the Company assumed the risk of all future business interruption until permanent repairs were completed.





Detail of the activities related to the property and business interruption insurance claims and recoveries, as well as where the net impacts are recorded on the Consolidated Statements of Income, for 2015 and 2014 are as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2015 2014
Total insurance recoveries$460
 $9,375
Insurance recoveries - interruption of business$460
 $925
Less: out-of-pocket expenses related to interruption of business in Cost of Sales

 617
Net reduction to Cost of sales on the Consolidated Statements of Income
$460
 $308
    
Insurance recoveries - property damage$
 $8,450
Less: Net book value of property loss in insurance recoveries
 160
Insurance recoveries on the Consolidated Statements of Income
$
 $8,290

NOTE 17:ACQUISITION

On November 7, 2016, the Company acquired 100% controlling interest in the George Remus®Remus® brand business from Queen City Whiskey LLC in a taxable purchase transaction. The results of the George Remus®Remus® brand business since that date have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements. As a result of the acquisition, the Company is expected to expand the distribution of the George Remus®Remus® brand products. It also expects to reduce costs through economies of scale. The goodwill and other intangible asset of $1,850 arising from the acquisition relates to the synergies and those cost reductions. The aggregate noncontingent portion of the purchase price was $1,551 and was paid in cash. The purchase price also included a contingent consideration arrangement with a fair value of $350. This fair value was based on significant inputs that are not observable and are referred to as Level 3 inputs. The contingent consideration to be paid is calculated on the excess sales over a base level through 2020 and is not limited in amount.
 

The following table summarizes


Summary of the consideration paid for the George Remus®Remus® brand business and the amount of estimated fair value of the assets acquired at the acquisition date.date:
Consideration:  
Cash$1,551
$1,551
Contingent consideration arrangement (included in Other non-current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets)
350
350
Fair value of total consideration transferred$1,901
$1,901
  
Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired:  
Inventory$51
$51
Total identifiable net assets assumed$51
$51
Goodwill and Brand name (indefinite lived) (included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets) (see Note 4)
1,850
Goodwill and Brand name (indefinite lived) (included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets) (Note 4)
1,850
Total$1,901
$1,901




NOTE 18:17:SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Dividend Declaration

On February 15, 2017,21, 2018, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend payable to stockholders of record as of March 1, 2017,9, 2018, of the Company'sour Common Stock and a dividend equivalent payable to holders of RSUs as of March 1, 2017,9, 2018, of $0.04$0.08 per share and per unit.  The dividend payment and dividend equivalent payment will occur on March 24, 2017.23, 2018.



        


ITEM 9.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

ITEM 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
As of the end of the fiscal year, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have each reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have each concluded that our current disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
 
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROLS    
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and our independent registered public accounting firm’s attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting can be found under Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS
 
There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15 that occurred during 20162017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect MGP Ingredients, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.  OTHER INFORMATION
 
None.

        


PART III

ITEM 10.  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
 
Incorporated by reference to the information under Election of Directors, Corporate Governance and Committee Reports -  The Board; Standing Committees; Meetings; Independence, Corporate Governance and Committee Reports - Audit Committee, and Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance of the Proxy Statement.
 
The Company has adopted a code of conduct (ethics) that applies to all its employees, including the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions. A current copy is filed on the Company's website at www.mgpingredients.com. The Company intends to disclose any changes in, or waivers from, this code of conduct by posting such information on the same website or by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K, in each case to the extent such disclosure is required by applicable rules.

ITEM 11.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
 
Incorporated by reference to the information in Executive Compensation and Other Information, Corporate Governance and Committee Reports - The Board; Standing Committees; Meetings; Independence and Corporate Governance and Committee Reports - Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation of the Proxy Statement.

ITEM 12.  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Incorporated by reference to the information under Principal Stockholders of the Proxy Statement.
 
The following is a summary of securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2016:2017:

(1) Number of shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
 
 

(2) Weighted average of exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
 
 

(3) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column
(1))
 

(1) Number of shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants, and rights
 
 

(2) Weighted average of exercise price of outstanding options, warrants, and rights
 
 

(3) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column
(1))
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders527,486
 $10.17
 1,509,683
368,492
 $17.20
 1,455,890
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
 
 

 
 
Total527,486
 $10.17
 1,509,683
368,492
 $17.20
 1,455,890

ITEM 13.  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
 
Incorporated by reference to the information under Corporate Governance and Committee Reports – The Board; Standing Committees; Meetings; Independence and to the information under Related Transactions of the Proxy Statement.

ITEM 14.  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
 
Incorporated by reference to the information under Audit and Certain Other Fees Paid Accountants of the Proxy Statement.
        


PART IV

ITEM 15.  EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
 
(a)    The following financial statements are filed as part of this report:
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the Consolidated Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial Statements. 
Consolidated Statements of Income – for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014.2015. 
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) – for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014.2015.  
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016. 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity – for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014.  
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.2015.  
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(b)    Financial Statement Schedules:

We have omitted all other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission either because they are not required under the related instructions, because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, or because they do not apply.

(c)    The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are set forth in the Exhibit Index below.




























        


EXHIBIT LIST
2.1
2.2
2.3
3.1.1
3.1.2
3.1.3
3.2
4.1
4.1.1**4.1.1
4.1.2**4.1.2

4.1.3Amended and Restated Guaranty and Security Agreement dated November 2, 2012, by and among MGP Ingredients, Inc., MGPI of Indiana, LLC, MGPI Pipeline, Inc., MGPI Processing, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24.1.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 8, 2012 (File number 000-17196))
4.2Commercial Security Agreement from MGPI Processing, Inc. (formerly MGP Ingredients, Inc.) to Union State Bank of Everest dated March 31, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5.2 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2009 (File number 000-17196))
4.2.1Amendment to Commercial Security Agreement dated as of July 20, 2009 between MGPI Processing, Inc. (formerly MGP Ingredients, Inc.) and Union State Bank of Everest (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5.3 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2009 (File number 000-17196))
4.3Promissory Note dated July 20, 2009 from MGPI Processing, Inc. (formerly MGP Ingredients, Inc.) to Union State Bank of Everest in the initial principal amount of $2,000,000 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2009 (File number 000-17196))
4.3.1Commercial Security Agreement dated July 20, 2009 from MGPI Processing, Inc. (formerly MGP Ingredients, Inc.) to Union State Bank of Everest relating to equipment at the Atchison and Onaga facilities (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6.1 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2009 (File number 000-17196))
4.3.2Mortgage dated July 20, 2009 from MGPI Processing, Inc. (formerly MGP Ingredients, Inc.) to Union State Bank of Everest relating to the Atchison facility (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6.2 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2009 (File number 000-17196))
4.4Amended and Restated Intercreditor Agreement between Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Union State Bank of Everest dated October 31, 2012 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 8, 2012 (File number 000-17196))
4.5Master Lease Agreement dated as of June 28, 2011 between U.S. Bancorp Equipment Finance, Inc. and MGPI Processing, Inc. (formerly MGP Ingredients, Inc.) and related bill of sale and Schedules #001-0018787-001 and 1166954-001-0018787-001 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of the Company’sCompany's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011(File number 000-17196))
4.5.1Mortgagee’s Waiver executed by Union State Bank of Everest (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7.1 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011December 31, 2016 (File number 000-17196))


4.2
4.5.2Mortgagee’s Waiver and lien release executed by Wells Fargo Bank National Association (Incorporated by reference
10.1Assumption Agreement, dated as of January 3, 2012, between MGPI Processing, Inc. (formerly MGP Ingredients, Inc.) and MGP Ingredients, Inc. (formerly MGPI Holdings, Inc.) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 5, 2012on July 10, 2017 (File number 000-17196))
10.24.3
4.4
10.1
10.3*10.2*Copy of MGP Ingredients, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors, as amended (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File number 333-51849))
10.4*Copy of amendments to Options granted under MGP Ingredients, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1998 (File number 000-17196))
10.5*Form of Option Agreement for the grant of Options under the MGP Ingredients, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors, as amended (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1998 (File number 000-17196))
10.6*Non-Employee Directors’ Restricted Stock and Restricted Unit Plan, as amended and restated (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 5, 2012 (File number 000-17196))
10.7*Amendment 1 to Non-Employee Directors' Restricted Stock and restricted Stock Unit Plan dated as of March 14, 2014 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended March 31, 2014 (File number 000-17196))
10.8*
10.9.1*10.3.1*
10.9.2*10.3.2*
10.10*10.4*


10.11*
10.5*
10.12*10.6*Guidelines on Issuance of 2011 Transition Period Restricted Stock Unit Awards (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.52 of the Company’s Report on Form 10-K for the transition period from July 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 (File number 000-17196))
10.13*Guidelines on Issuance of Fiscal 2011 Restricted Share Awards (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 (File number 000-17196))
10.14*
10.15*10.7*
10.16*10.8*Non-Employee Director Restricted Share Award Agreement effective October 21, 2011 of John Speirs (Similar agreements were made for the same number of shares with Michael Braude, John Byom, Cloud L. Cray, Gary Gradinger, Linda Miller, Karen Seaberg and Daryl Schaller) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 (File number 000-17196))
10.18*
10.19*10.9*Form of Award Agreement for Fiscal 2013 Restricted Stock Unit Awards granted under the Non-Employee Directors’ Restricted Stock and Restricted Unit Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013)
10.20*
10.21*10.10*


10.11*
10.22*
10.23.1*10.12*Form of Indemnification Agreement between MGPI Processing, Inc. (formerly MGP Ingredients, Inc.) and its Directors and Executive Officers (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 (File number 000-17196))
10.23.2*
10.24*10.13*
10.2510.14*Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release dated December 3, 2013 among MGP Ingredients, Inc. and Cloud "Bud" Cray, Jr., Karen Seaberg, and Thomas M. Cray, Michael Braude, Linda Miller, Gary Gradinger, Daryl Schaller, John Speirs, and Timothy Newkirk (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 6, 2013 (File number 000-17196))
10.26*
10.2710.15
10.16*
21**
23.1**
24
31.1**
31.2**
32.1**
32.2**
101**

* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement ** Filed herewith



ITEM 16.  FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.
        


SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the city of Atchison, State of Kansas, on this 8th1st day of March, 2017.2018.
 
 
 MGP INGREDIENTS, INC.
   
 By/s/ Augustus C. Griffin
  Augustus C. Griffin, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
   
 By/s/ Thomas K. Pigott
  Thomas K. Pigott, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)


POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Augustus C. Griffin and Thomas K. Pigott each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any, and all, capacities, and to sign any, and all, reports of the Registrant on Form 10-K and to sign any, and all, amendments to such reports and to file the same with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities & Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite or necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities indicated on the dates indicated
NameTitleDate
/s/Augustus C. Griffin
Augustus C. GriffinPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 1, 2018
/s/ Thomas K. Pigott
Thomas K. PigottVice President, Finance and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 1, 2018
/s/ James L. Bareuther
James L. BareutherDirectorMarch 1, 2018
/s/ David J. Colo
David J. ColoDirectorMarch 1, 2018
/s/ Terrence P. Dunn
Terrence P. DunnDirectorMarch 1, 2018
/s/ Anthony P. Foglio
Anthony P. FoglioDirectorMarch 1, 2018
/s/ George W. Page, Jr.
George W. Page, Jr.DirectorMarch 1, 2018
/s/ Daryl R. Schaller
Daryl R. SchallerDirectorMarch 1, 2018
/s/ Karen Seaberg
Karen SeabergDirectorMarch 1, 2018
/s/ M. Jeannine Strandjord
M. Jeannine StrandjordDirectorMarch 1, 2018

8473