UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
ý ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162017
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________ to _________
Commission file number: 33-92990; 333-210139333-216849
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
NEW YORK
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
NOT APPLICABLE
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
C/O TEACHERS INSURANCE AND
ANNUITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
730 THIRD AVENUE
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017-3206
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 490-9000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
YES o NO ý
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act:
YES o NO ý
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES ý NO o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 or regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K: Not Applicable
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES ý NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” andfiler,” “smaller reporting company” or "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): |
| | |
Large accelerated filer o | | Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer x | | Smaller Reporting Company o |
| (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Emerging Growth Company o |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
YES o NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES o NO ý
Aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates: Not Applicable
Documents Incorporated by Reference: None
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| | | |
| | Item | | Page |
| |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| |
| | | Market for the Registrant's Securities, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | |
| | | | |
| | | Management's Discussion and Analysis of the Account's Financial Condition and Results of Operations | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| |
| | | | |
| | | Form 10-K Summary | |
| |
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
General. The TIAA Real Estate Account (the “Real Estate Account”, the “Account” or the “Registrant”) was established on February 22, 1995, as an insurance company separate account of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (“TIAA”), a New York insurance company, by resolution of TIAA’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”). The Account, which invests mainly in real estate and real estate-related investments, is a variable annuity investment option offered through individual, group and tax-deferred annuity contracts available to employees in the academic, medical, cultural and research fields. The Account commenced operations on July 3, 1995, and interests in the Account were first offered to eligible participants on October 2, 1995.
The Account offers individual and group accumulating annuity contracts (with contributions made on a pre-tax or after-tax basis), as well as individual lifetime and term-certain variable payout annuity contracts (including the payment of death benefits to beneficiaries). Investors are entitled to transfer funds to or from the Account under certain circumstances. Funds invested in the Account for each category of contract are expressed in terms of units, and unit values will fluctuate depending on the Account’s performance.
The Account is regulated by the New York Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”), and the insurance departments of certain other jurisdictions in which the annuity contracts are offered. Although TIAA owns the assets of the Real Estate Account and the Account’s obligations are obligations of TIAA, the Account’s income, investment gains and investment losses are credited to or charged against the assets of the Account without regard to TIAA’s other income, gains, or losses. Under New York insurance law, the Account cannot be charged with liabilities incurred by any other TIAA business activities or any other TIAA separate account.
The Real Estate Account is designed as an option for retirement and tax-deferred savings plans for employees of non-profit and governmental institutions. TIAA currently offers the Real Estate Account under the following annuity contracts:
RAs and GRAs (Retirement Annuities and Group Retirement Annuities)
SRAs (Supplemental Retirement Annuities)
GSRAs (Group Supplemental Retirement Annuities)
Retirement Choice and Retirement Choice Plus Annuities
GAs (Group Annuities) and Institutionally Owned GSRAs
ClassicTraditional and Roth IRAs (Individual Retirement Annuities) including SEP IRAs (Simplified Employee Pension Plans)
Keoghs
ATRAs (After-Tax Retirement Annuities)
Real Estate Account Accumulation Contract
Note that state regulatory approval may be pending for certain of these contracts and these contracts may not currently be available in every state. TIAA may also offer the Real Estate Account as an investment option under additional contracts, both at the individual and plan sponsor level, in the future.
Investment Objective. The Real Estate Account seeks to generate favorable long-termtotal returns primarily through the rental income and appreciation of a diversified portfolio of directly held, private real estate investments and real estate-related investments, owned by the Account. The Account will also invest in non-real estate-related publicly traded securities and short-term higher quality liquid investments that are easily converted to cash to enable the Account to meet participant redemption requests, purchase or improve properties, or cover other expense needs.while offering investors guaranteed, daily liquidity.
Investment Strategy
Real Estate-Related Investments. The Account intends to have between 75% and 85% of its net assets invested directly in real estate or real estate-related investments with the goal of producing favorable long-term returns primarily through rental income and appreciation. These investments may consist of:
Direct ownership interests in real estate;
Direct ownership of real estate through interests in joint ventures;
Indirect interests in real estate through real estate-related securities, such as:
public and/or privately placed registered and unregistered equity investments in real estate investment trusts (“REITs”), which investments may consist of registered or unregistered common or preferred stock interests;
real estate limited partnerships and limited liability companies;
investments in equity or debt securities of companies whose operations involve real estate (i.e., that primarily own or manage real estate) which may not be REITs; and
conventional commercial mortgage loans, participating mortgage loans, secured domestic and foreign (including U.K.) mezzanine loans, subordinated loans and collateralized mortgage obligations, including commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) and other similar investments.
The Account’s principal strategy is to purchase direct ownership interests in income-producing real estate, primarily office, industrial, retail and multi-family properties. The Account is targeted to hold between 65% and 80% of the Account’s net assets in such direct ownership interests at any time. Historically, at least 70% of the Account’s net assets have comprised such direct ownership interests in real estate.interests.
In addition, while the Account is authorized to hold up to 25% of its net assets in liquid real estate-related securities, such as publicly traded REITs and CMBS, management intends that the Account will not hold more than 10% of its net assets in such securities on a long-term basis. Traditionally, less than 10% of the Account’s net assets have comprised interests in these securities; although, the Account has held approximately 10% of its net assets in equity REIT securities at times. In addition, under the Account’s current investment guidelines, the Account is authorized to hold up to 10% of its net assets in CMBS. As of December 31, 2016,2017, REIT securities comprised approximately 4.4%5.0% of the Account’s net assets, and the Account held no CMBS as of such date.
Non-Real Estate-Related Investments. The Account will invest the remaining portion of its assets (targeted to be between 15% and 25% of its net assets) in publicly traded, liquid investments; namely:
Short-term government related instruments, including U.S. Treasury bills;
Long-term government related instruments, such as securities issued by U.S. government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored entities;
Short-term non-government related instruments, such as money market instruments and commercial paper;
Long-term non-government related instruments, such as corporate debt securities; and
Stock of companies that do not primarily own or manage real estate.
However, from time to time, the Account’s non-real estate-related liquid investments may comprise less than 15% (and possibly less than 10%) of its assets (on a net basis and/or a gross basis), especially during and immediately following periods of significant net participant outflows, in particular due to significant participant transfer activity.outflows. In addition, the Account, from time to time and on a temporary basis, may hold in excess of 25% of its net assets in non-real estate-related liquid investments, particularly during times of significant inflows into the Account and/or a lack of attractive real estate-related investments available in the market.
Liquid Securities Generally. Primarily due to management’s need to manage fluctuations in cash flows, in particular during and immediately following periods of significant participant net transfer activity into or out of the Account, the Account may, on a temporary basis (i) exceed the upper end of its targeted holdings (currently 35% of the Account’s net assets) in liquid securities of all types, including both publicly traded non-real estate-related liquid investments and liquid real estate-related securities, such as REITs and CMBS, or (ii) be below the low end of its targeted holdings in such liquid securities (currently 15% of the Account’s net assets).
The portion of the Account’s net assets invested in liquid investments of all types may exceed the upper end of its target, for example, if (i) the Account receives a large inflow of money in a short period of time, in particular due to significant participant transfer activity into the Account, (ii) the Account receives significant proceeds from sales or financings of direct real estate assets, (iii) there is a lack of attractive direct real estate investments available on the market, and/or (iv) the Account anticipates more near-term cash needs, including to apply to acquire direct real estate investments, pay expenses or repay indebtedness.
Foreign Investments. The Account from time to time will also make foreign real estate and real estate-related investments. Under the Account’s investment guidelines, investments in direct foreign real estate and real estate loans, together with foreign real estate-related securities and foreign non-real estate-related liquid investments may not comprise more than 25% of the Account’s net assets. However, through the date of this report, such foreign real estate-related investments have never represented more than 7.5% of the Account’s net assets and management does not intend such foreign investments to exceed 10% of the Account’s net assets. As of December 31, 2016,2017, the Account did not hold any foreign real estate investments.
Investments Summary. At December 31, 2016,2017, the Account’s net assets totaled $24.3$24.9 billion. As of that date, the Account’s investments in real estate properties, real estate joint ventures, limited partnerships, loans receivable and real estate-related marketable securities, net of the fair value of mortgage loans payable on real estate, represented 83.3%84.4% of the Account’s net assets.
At December 31, 2016,2017, the Account held a total of 129138 real estate investments (including its interests in 2428 real estate-related joint ventures), representing 79.1%79.5% of the Account’s total investments, measured on a gross asset value basis (“Total Investments”).basis. As of that date, the Account also held investments in government agency notes (representing 8.7%representing 10.6% of Total Investments),total investments, REIT equity securities representing 4.6% of total investments, U.S. Treasury securities (representing 6.5%representing 3.7% of Total Investments), REIT equity securities (representing 4.1% of Total Investments),total investments, loans receivable (representingrepresenting 1.1% of Total Investments)total investments and real estate limited partnerships (representingrepresenting 0.5% of Total Investments).total investments. See the Account’s audited consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements for more information as to the Account’s investments as of December 31, 2016.2017.
Borrowing. The Account is authorized to borrow money and assume or obtain a mortgage on a property (i.e., make leveraged real estate investments). Under the Account’s current investment guidelines, management intends to maintain the Account’s loan-to-value ratio (as defined below) at or below 30% (measured at the time of incurrence and after giving effect thereto). Forms of borrowing may include:
placing new debt on properties;
refinancing outstanding debt;
assuming debt on the Account’s properties; or
extending the maturity date of outstanding debt.debt; or
an unsecured line of credit or credit facility.
The Account’s loan-to-value ratio at any time is based on the ratio of the outstanding principal amount of the Account’s debt to the Account’s total gross asset value. The Account’s total gross asset value, for these purposes, is equal to the total fair value of the Account’s assets (including the fair value of the Account’s interest in joint ventures), with no reduction associated with any indebtedness on such assets. In calculating outstanding indebtedness, we include only the Account’s actual percentage interest in any borrowings on a joint venture investment and not that of any joint venture partner. Also, at the time the Account (or a joint venture in which the Account is a partner) enters into a revolving or other line of credit, management deems the maximum amount which may be drawn under that line of credit as fully incurred, regardless of whether the maximum amount available has been drawn from time to time.includes only amounts outstanding when calculating outstanding indebtedness.
As of December 31, 2016,2017, the aggregate principal amount of the Account’s outstanding debt (including the Account’s share of debt on its joint venture investments) was $4.4$4.6 billion and the Account’s loan-to-value ratio was approximately 15.0%15.5%.
In times of high net inflow activity, in particular during times of high net participant transfer inflows, management may determine to apply a portion of such cash flows to make prepayments of indebtedness prior to scheduled maturity, which would have the effect of reducing the Account’s loan-to-value ratio. Such prepayments may require the Account to pay fees or ‘yield maintenance’ amounts to lenders.
In addition, the Account may obtain a line of credit to meet short-term cash needs, if needed. Management expects the proceeds from any such short-term borrowing would be used to meet the cash flow needs of the Account’s properties and real estate-related investments.
The Account may only borrow up to 70% of the then-current value of a property, although construction loans may be for 100% of costs incurred in developing the property. Except for construction loans, any mortgage loans on a property will be non-recourse to the Account, meaning that if there is a default on a loan in respect to a specific property, the lender will have recourse to (i.e., be able to foreclose on) only the property encumbered (or the joint venture owning the property), or to other specific Account properties that may have been pledged as security for the defaulted loan, but not to any other assets of the Account. When possible, the Account will seek to have loans mature at varying times to limit the risks of borrowing.
Risk Factors. The Account’s assets and income can be affected by a variety of risk factors. These risks are more fully described under Item 1A of this report.
Personnel and Management. The Account has no officers, directors or employees. TIAA employees, under the direction and control of the Board, manage the investment of the Account’s assets, following investment management procedures TIAA has adopted for the Account. References to “Management” herein refer to the employees and officers of TIAA responsible for management of the Account. In addition, TIAA performs administration functions for the Account (which includes receiving and allocating premiums, calculating and making annuity payments and providing recordkeeping and other services). Distribution services for the Account (which include, without limitation, distribution of the annuity contracts, advising existing annuity contract owners in connection with their accumulations and helping employers implement and manage retirement plans) are performed by TIAA-CREF Individual & Institutional Services, LLC (“Services”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of TIAA and registered broker-dealer and member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”). TIAA and Services provide investment advisory, administration, and distribution services, as applicable, to the Account on an “at-cost” basis.
Contracts. TIAA offers the Account as a variable option for the annuity contracts listed earlier in this Item 1, although some employer plans may not offer the Account as an option for certain contracts. Each payment to the Account buys a number of accumulation units. Similarly, any transfer or withdrawal from the Account results in the redemption of a number of accumulation units. The price paid for an accumulation unit, and the price received for an accumulation unit when redeemed, is the accumulation unit value (“AUV”) calculated for the business day on which the participant’s purchase, redemption or transfer request is received in good order (unless a participant asks for a later date for a redemption or transfer).
Subject to the terms of the contracts and a participant’s employer’s plan, a participant can move money to and from the Account in the following ways, among others:
from the Account to a CREFCollege Retirement Equities Fund ("CREF") investment account, a TIAA Access variable account (if available), TIAA’s Traditional Annuity or a mutual fund (including TIAA-CREF affiliated mutual funds) or other options available under the plan;
to the Account from a CREF investment account, a TIAA Access variable account (if available), TIAA’s Traditional Annuity (transfers from TIAA’s Traditional Annuity under RA, GRA or Retirement Choice contracts are subject to restrictions), a TIAA-CREF affiliated mutual fund or from other companies/ plans;
by withdrawing cash; and/or
by setting up a program of automatic withdrawals or transfers.
Importantly, transfers out of the Account to a TIAA or CREF account or into another investment option can be executed on any business day, but are limited to once per calendar quarter, although some plans may allow systematic transfers that result in more than one transfer per calendar quarter. TIAA reserves the right to stop accepting transfers into the Account at any time. Other limited exceptions may apply. Also, transfers to CREF accounts or to certain other options may be restricted by an employer’s plan, current tax law or by the terms of a participant’s contract. In addition, with most contracts, individual participants are subject to certain limitations on making internal transfers into their Account accumulation if, after giving effect to such transfer, the total value of such participant’s Account accumulation (under all contracts issued to such participant) would exceed $150,000. Categories of transactions that TIAA deems “internal funding vehicle transfers” for purposes of this limitation are described in the applicable contract or endorsement form in the Account’s prospectus. The effective date of the limitation as applies to an individual
participant will be reflected on his or her applicable contract or endorsement form. See the Account’s prospectus for more information.
Appraisals and Valuations. With respect to the Account’s real property investments or associated interest in the underlying property held by a joint venture investment (collectively "real properties"), following the initial purchase of a property or the making of a mortgage loan on a property by the Account (at which time the Account normally receives an independent appraisal on such property), each of the Account’s real properties are appraised, and mortgage loans are valued, at least once every calendar quarter or sooner as circumstances arise. Each of the Account’s real estate properties are appraised each quarter by an independent third-party state-certified (or its foreign equivalent) appraiser (which we refer to in this report as an “independent appraiser”) who is a member of a professional appraisal organization. In addition, TIAA’s internal appraisal staff performs a review of each of these quarterly appraisals, in conjunction with the Account’s independent fiduciary, and TIAA’s internal appraisal staff or the independent fiduciary may request an additional appraisal or valuation outside of this quarterly cycle. Any differences in the conclusions of TIAA’s internal appraisal staff and the independent appraiser will be reviewed by the independent fiduciary, which will make a final determination on the matter (which may include ordering a subsequent independent appraisal).
In general, the Account records appraisals of its real estate properties spread out throughout the quarter, which is intended to result in appraisal adjustments and thus adjustments to the valuations of its holdings (to the extent adjustments are made) happen regularly throughout each quarter and not on one specific day in each period. In addition, an estimated daily equivalent of net operating income is taken into consideration and is adjusted for actual transactional activity. The remaining assets in the Account are primarily marketable securities that are priced on a daily basis. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of the Account’s Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies” in this Form 10-K for more information on how each class of the Account’s investments are valued.
Liquidity Guarantee. The TIAA General Account provides the Account with a liquidity guarantee enabling the Account to have funds available to meet participant redemption, transfer or cash withdrawal requests. The Account pays TIAA for the risk associated with providing the liquidity guarantee through a daily deduction from the Account’s net assets. If the Account cannot fund participant requests from the Account’s own cash flow and liquid investments, the TIAA General Account will fund them by purchasing accumulation units issued by the Account (accumulation units that are purchased by TIAA are generally referred to as “liquidity units”). This liquidity guarantee is required by the NYDFS. TIAA guarantees that participants can redeem their accumulation units at the accumulation unit value next determined after their transfer or cash withdrawal request is received in good order. Liquidity units owned by TIAA are valued in the same manner as accumulation units owned by the Account’s participants.
This liquidity guarantee is not a guarantee of the investment performance of the Account or a guarantee of the value of a participant’s units. Primarily as a result of significant net participant transfers in the second half of 2008 and the first half of 2009, pursuant to this liquidity guarantee obligation, the TIAA General Account purchased an aggregate of $1.2 billion of liquidity units issued by the Account between December 2008 and June 2009. Since July 1, 2009, and through the date of filing this Annual Report on Form 10-K, no further liquidity units have been purchased.
Redemption of Liquidity Units. The independent fiduciary is vested with oversight and approval over any redemption of TIAA’s liquidity units, acting in the best interests of Real Estate Account participants.
As of March 31, 2013, the independent fiduciary completed the systematic redemption of all of the liquidity units held by the TIAA General Account. Approximately one-quarter of such units were redeemed evenly over the business days in each of the months of June, September and December 2012, and March 2013, representing a total of $940.3 million and $325.4 million redeemed during 2012 and 2013, respectively.
To the extent liquidity units are held by the TIAA General Account, the independent fiduciary reserves the right to authorize or direct the redemption of all or a portion of liquidity units at any time. Upon termination and liquidation of the Account (wind-up), any liquidity units held by TIAA will be the last units redeemed, unless the independent fiduciary directs otherwise.
Independent Fiduciary. Because TIAA’s ability to purchase and sell liquidity units raises certain technical issues under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), TIAA applied for and received
a prohibited transaction exemption from the U.S. Department of Labor in 1996 (PTE 96-76). In connection with the exemption, TIAA has appointed an independent fiduciary for the Account, with overall responsibility for reviewing the Account’s transactions to determine whether they are in accordance with the Account’s investment guidelines.
RERC, LLC, a real estate consulting firm whose principal offices are located in West Des Moines, IA (“RERC”), was appointed as independent fiduciary effective March 1, 2006 and currently serves as the Account’s independent fiduciary, pursuant to an amended and restated letter agreement effective March 1, 2015,2018, whose term expires on February 28, 2018.2021. The independent fiduciary’s responsibilities include:
reviewing and approving the Account’s investment guidelines and monitoring whether the Account’s investments comply with those guidelines;
reviewing and approving valuation procedures for the Account’s properties;
approving adjustments to any property valuations that change the value of the property or the Account as a whole above or below certain prescribed levels, or that are made within three months of the annual independent appraisal;
reviewing and approving how the Account values accumulation and annuity units;
approving the appointment of all independent appraisers;
reviewing the purchase and sale of units by TIAA to ensure that the Account uses the correct unit values; and
requiring appraisals besides those normally conducted, if the independent fiduciary believes that any of the properties have changed materially, or that an additional appraisal is necessary to ensure the Account has correctly valued a property.
In addition, the independent fiduciary has certain responsibilities with respect to the Account that it had historically undertaken or is currently undertaking with respect to TIAA’s purchase and ownership of liquidity units, including among other things, reviewing the purchases and redemption of liquidity units by TIAA to ensure the Account uses the correct unit values. In connection therewith, as set forth in PTE 96-76, the independent fiduciary’s responsibilities include:
establishing the percentage of total accumulation units that TIAA’s ownership should not exceed (the “trigger point”) and creating a method for changing the trigger point;
approving any adjustment of TIAA’s ownership interest in the Account and, in its discretion, requiring an adjustment if TIAA’s ownership of liquidity units reaches the trigger point; and
once the trigger point has been reached, participating in any program to reduce TIAA’s ownership in the Account by utilizing cash flow or liquid investments in the Account, or by utilizing the proceeds from asset sales. If the independent fiduciary were to determine that TIAA’s ownership should be reduced following the trigger point, its role in participating in any asset sales program would include (i) participating in the selection of properties for sale, (ii) providing sales guidelines, and (iii) approving those sales if, in the independent fiduciary’s opinion, such sales are desirable to reduce TIAA’s ownership of liquidity units.
Available Information. The Account’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and any amendments to those reports, filed by the Account with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or after the date hereof, can be accessed free of charge at www.tiaa.org. Information contained on this website is expressly not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
The value of your investment in the Account will fluctuate based on the value of the Account’s assets, the income the assets generate and the Account’s expenses. Participants can lose money by investing in the Account. There is risk associated with an investor attempting to “time” an investment in the Account’s units, or effecting a redemption of an investor’s units. The Account’s assets and income can be affected by many factors, and you should consider the specific risks presented below before investing in the Account. In particular, for a discussion of how forward-looking statements contained in this annual report on Form 10-K are subject to uncertainties that are difficult to predict, which may be beyond management’s control and which could cause actual results to differ materially from historical experience or management’s present expectations, please refer to the subsection entitled “Forward-Looking Statements,” which is contained in the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of the Account’s Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH REAL ESTATE INVESTING
General Risks of Acquiring and Owning Real Property. As referenced elsewhere in this report, the substantial majority of the Account’s net assets consist of direct ownership interests in real estate. As such, the Account is particularly subject to the risks inherent in acquiring and owning real property, including in particular the following:
Adverse Global and Domestic Economic Conditions. The economic conditions in the markets where the Account’s properties are located may be adversely impacted by factors which include:
adverse domestic or global economic conditions, particularly in the event of a deep recession which results in significant employment losses across many sectors of the economy and reduced levels of consumer spending;
a weak market for real estate generally and/or in specific locations where the Account may own property;
business closings, industry or sector slowdowns, employment losses and related factors;
the availability of financing (both for the Account and potential purchasers of the Account’s properties);
an oversupply of, or a reduced demand for, certain types of real estate properties;
natural disasters, flooding and other significant and severe weather-related events;
terrorist attacks and/or other man-made events; and
decline in population or shifting demographics.
The incidence of some or all of these factors could reduce occupancy, rental rates and the fair value of the Account’s real properties or interests in investment vehicles (such as limited partnerships) which directly hold real properties.
Concentration Risk. The Account may experience periods in which its investments are geographically concentrated, either regionally or in certain markets with similar demographics. Further, while the Account seeks diversification across its four primary property types: office, industrial, retail and multi-family properties, the Account may experience periods where it has concentration in one property type, increasing the potential exposure if there were to be an oversupply of, or a reduced demand for, certain types of real estate properties in the markets in which the Account operates.
Also, the Account may experience periods in which its tenant base is concentrated within a particular industry sector. For example, the Account owns and operates a number of industrial properties, which typically feature larger tenant concentration. The insolvency and/or closing of a single tenant in one of our industrial properties may significantly impair the income generated by an industrial property, and may also depress the value of such property.
In addition, the Account owns and operates a number of properties in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area and a prolonged period of significantly diminished federal expenditures could have an adverse impact on demand for office space by the U.S. government and the sectors and industries dependent upon the U.S. government in such region or other regions where the government or such related businesses are large lessees.
If any or all of these events occur, the Account’s income and performance may be adversely impacted disproportionately by deteriorating economic conditions in those areas or industry sectors in which the Account’s investments are concentrated. Also, the Account could experience a more rapid negative change in the value of its real estate investments than would be the case if its real estate investments were more diversified.
Leasing Risk. A number of factors could cause the Account’s rental income, a key source of the Account’s revenue and investment return, to decline, which would adversely impact the Account’s results and investment returns. These factors include the following:
A property may be unable to attract new tenants or retain existing tenants. This situation could be exacerbated if a concentration of lease expirations occurred during any one time period or multiple tenants exercise early termination at the same time.
The financial condition of our tenants may be adversely impacted, particularly in a prolonged economic downturn. The Account could lose revenue if tenants do not pay rent when contractually obligated, request some form of rent relief and/or default under a lease at one of the Account’s properties. Such a default could occur if a tenant declared bankruptcy, suffered from a lack of liquidity, failed to continue to operate its business or for other reasons. In the event of any such default, we may experience a delay in, or an inability to effect, the enforcement of our rights against that tenant, particularly if that tenant filed for bankruptcy protection. Further, any disputes with tenants could involve costly and time consuming litigation.
In the event a tenant vacates its space at one of the Account’s properties, whether as a result of a default, the expiration of the lease term, rejection of the lease in bankruptcy or otherwise, given current market conditions, we may not be able to re-lease the vacant space either (i) for as much as the rent payable under the previous lease or (ii) at all. Also, we may not be able to re-lease such space without incurring substantial expenditures for tenant improvements and other lease-up related costs, while still being obligated for any mortgage payments, real estate taxes and other expenditures related to the property.
In some instances, our properties may be specifically suited to and/or outfitted for the particular needs of a certain tenant based on the type of business the tenant operates. For example, many companies desire space with an open floor plan. We may have difficulty obtaining a new tenant for any vacant space in our properties, particularly if the floor plan limits the types of businesses that can use the space without major renovation, which may require us to incur substantial expense in re-planning the space. Also, upon expiration of a lease, the space preferences of our major tenants may no longer align with the space they previously rented, which could cause those tenants to not renew their lease, or may require us to expend significant sums to reconfigure the space to their needs.
The Account owns and operates retail properties, which, in addition to the risks listed above, are subject to specific risks, including the insolvency and/or closing of an anchor tenant. Many times, anchor tenants will be “big box” stores and other large retailers that can be particularly adversely impacted by a global recession, competition from online retailers and reduced consumer spending generally. Factors that can impact the level of consumer spending include increases in fuel and energy costs, residential and commercial real estate and mortgage conditions, labor and healthcare costs, access to credit, consumer confidence and other macroeconomic factors. Under certain circumstances, co-tenancy clauses in tenants’ leases may allow certain tenants in a retail property to terminate their leases or reduce or withhold rental payments when overall occupancy at the property falls below certain minimum levels. The insolvency and/or closing of an anchor tenant may also cause such tenants to terminate their leases, or to fail to renew their leases at expiration.
Competition. The Account may face competition for real estate investments from multiple sources, including individuals, corporations, insurance companies or other insurance company separate accounts, as well as real estate limited partnerships, real estate investment funds, commercial developers, pension plans, other institutional and foreign investors and other entities engaged in real estate investment activities. Some of these competitors may have similar financial and other resources as the Account, and/ or they may have investment strategies and policies (including the ability to incur significantly more leverage than the Account) that allow them to compete more aggressively for real estate investment opportunities, which could result in the Account paying higher prices for investments, experiencing delays in acquiring investments or failing to consummate such purchases. Any resulting delays in the acquisition of investments, or the failure to consummate acquisitions the Account deems desirable, may increase the Account’s costs or otherwise adversely affect the Account’s investment results.
In addition, the Account’s properties may be located close to properties that are owned by other real estate investors and that compete with the Account for tenants. These competing properties may be better located, more suitable for tenants than our properties or have owners who may compete more aggressively for tenants, resulting in a competitive advantage for these other properties. We may also face similar competition from other properties that may be developed
in the future. This competition may limit the Account’s ability to lease space, increase its costs of securing tenants, and limit our ability to maximize our rents and/or require the Account to make capital improvements it otherwise would not, in order to make its properties more attractive to prospective tenants.
Operating Costs. A property’s cash flow could decrease if operating costs, such as property taxes, utilities, litigation expenses associated with a property, maintenance and insurance costs that are not reimbursed by tenants, increase in relation to gross rental income, or if the property needs unanticipated repairs and renovations. In addition, the Account’s expenses of owning and operating a property are not necessarily reduced when the Account’s income from a property is reduced.
Condemnation. A governmental agency may condemn and convert for a public use (i.e., through eminent domain) all or a portion of a property owned by the Account. While the Account would receive compensation in connection with any such condemnation, such compensation may not be in an amount the Account believes represents equivalent value for the condemned property. Further, a partial condemnation could impair the ability of the Account to maximize the value of the property during its operation, including making it more difficult to find new tenants or retain existing tenants. Finally, a property which has been subject to a partial condemnation may be more difficult to sell at a price the Account believes is appropriate.
Terrorism and Acts of War and Violence. Terrorist attacks may harm our property investments. The Account can provide no assurance that there will not be further terrorist attacks against the United States or U.S. businesses or elsewhere in the world. These attacks or armed conflicts may directly or indirectly impact the value of the property we own or that secure our loans. Losses resulting from these types of events may be uninsurable or not insurable to the full extent of the loss suffered. Moreover, any of these events could cause consumer confidence and spending to decrease or result in increased volatility in the United States, worldwide financial markets, and the global economy. Such events could also result in economic uncertainty in the United States or abroad. Adverse economic conditions resulting from terrorist activities could reduce demand for space in the Account’s properties and thereby reduce the value of the Account’s properties and therefore your investment return.
Risk of Limited Warranty. Purchasing a property “as is” or with limited warranties, which limit the Account’s recourse if due diligence fails to identify all material risks, can negatively impact the Account by reducing the value of such properties and increasing the Account’s cost to hold or sell properties.
General Risks of Selling Real Estate Investments. Among the risks of selling real estate investments are:
The sale price of an Account property might differ, perhaps significantly, from its estimated or appraised value, leading to losses or reduced profits to the Account.
The Account might not be able to sell a property at a particular time for a price which management believes represents its fair or full value. This illiquidity may result from the cyclical nature of real estate, general economic conditions impacting the location of the property, disruption in the credit markets or the availability of financing on favorable terms or at all, and the supply of and demand for available tenant space, among other reasons. This might make it difficult to raise cash quickly which could impair the Account’s liquidity position (particularly during any period of sustained significant net participant outflows) and also could lead to Account losses. Further, the liquidity guarantee does not serve as a working capital facility or credit line to enhance the Account’s liquidity levels generally, as its purpose is tied to participants having the ability to redeem their accumulation units upon demand (thus, alleviating the Account’s need to dispose of properties solely to increase liquidity levels in what management deems a suboptimal sales environment).
The Account may need to provide financing to a purchaser if no cash buyers are available, or if buyers are unable to receive financing on terms enabling them to consummate the purchase. Such seller financing introduces a risk that the counterparty may not perform its obligations to repay the amounts borrowed from the Account to complete the purchase.
For any particular property, the Account may be required to make expenditures for improvements to, or to correct defects in, the property before the Account is able to market and/or sell the property.
Interests in real estate limited partnerships tend to be, in particular, illiquid and the Account may be unable to dispose of such investments at opportune times.
Seller Indemnities. When the Account sells property, it is often required to provide some amount of indemnity for loss to the buyer. While the Account takes steps to try to mitigate the impact of the indemnities, such indemnities could negatively impact the sale price or result in claims by the buyer for indemnity in the future, which could increase the Account’s expenses and thereby reduce the return on investment.
Valuation and Appraisal Risks. Investments in the Account’s assets are stated at fair value, which is defined as the price that would be received to sell the asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Determination of fair value, particularly for real estate assets, involves significant judgment. Valuation of the Account’s real estate properties (which comprise a substantial majority of the Account’s net assets) are based on real estate appraisals, which are estimates of property values based on a professional’s opinion and may not be accurate predictors of the amount the Account would actually receive if it sold a property. Appraisals can be subjective in certain respects and rely on a variety of assumptions and conditions at that property or in the market in which the property is located, which may change materially after the appraisal is conducted. Among other things, market prices for comparable real estate may be volatile, in particular if there has been a lack of recent transaction activity in such market. Any future disruptions in the macroeconomy, real estate markets and the credit markets, such as those that occurred from 2008-2011, could lead to a significant decline in real estate transaction activity in most markets and sectors in which the Account is invested. The resulting lack of observable transaction data may make it more difficult for a property appraisal to determine the fair value of the Account’s investment in one or more real estate assets. In addition, a portion of the data used by appraisers is based on historical information at the time the appraisal is conducted, and subsequent changes to such data, after an appraiser has used such data in connection with the appraisal, may not be adequately captured in the appraised value. Also, to the extent that the Account uses a relatively small number of independent appraisers to value a significant portion of its properties, valuations may be subject to any institutional biases of such appraisers and their valuation procedures.
Further, as the Account generally obtains appraisals on a quarterly basis, there may be circumstances in the period between appraisals or interim valuation adjustments in which the true realizable value of a property is not reflected in the Account’s daily net asset value calculation or in the Account’s periodic consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements. This disparity may be more apparent when the commercial and/or residential real estate markets experience an overall and possibly dramatic decline (or increase) in property values in a relatively short period of time between appraisals.
If the appraised values of the Account’s properties as a whole are too high, those participants who purchased accumulation units prior to (i) a downward valuation adjustment of a property or multiple properties or (ii) a property or properties being sold for a lower price than the appraised value will be credited with less of an interest than if the value had previously been adjusted downward. Also, those participants who redeem during any such period will have received more than their pro rata share of the value of the Account’s assets, to the detriment of other non-redeeming participants. In particular, appraised property values may prove to be too high (as a whole) in a rapidly declining commercial real estate market. Further, implicit in the Account’s definition of fair value is a principal assumption that there will be a reasonable time to market a given property and that the property will be exchanged between a willing buyer and willing seller in a non-distressed scenario. However, an appraised value may not reflect the actual realizable value that would be obtained in a rush sale where time was of the essence. Also, appraised values may lag actual realizable values to the extent there is significant and rapid economic deterioration in a particular geographic market or a particular sector within a geographic market.
If the appraised values of the Account’s properties as a whole are too low, those participants who redeem prior to (i) an upward valuation adjustment of a property or multiple properties or (ii) a property or properties being sold for a higher price than the appraised value will have received less than their pro rata share of the value of the Account’s assets, and those participants who purchase units during any such period will be credited with more than their pro rata share of the value of the Account’s assets.
Finally, the Account recognizes items of income (such as net operating income from real estate investments, distributions from real estate limited partnerships or joint ventures, or dividends from REIT stocks) and expense in many cases on an intermittent basis, where the Account cannot predict with certainty the magnitude or the timing of such items. As such, even as the Account estimates items of net operating income on a daily basis, the AUV for the Account may fluctuate, perhaps significantly, from day to day, as a result of adjusting these estimates for the actual recognized item of income or expense.
Investment Risk Associated with Participant Transactions. The amount the Account has available to invest in new properties and other real estate-related assets will depend, in large part, on the level of net participant transfers into or out of the Account as well as participant premiums into the Account. As noted elsewhere in this report, the Account intends to hold between 15% and 25% of its net assets in publicly traded liquid investments (other than real estate and real estate-related investments), consisting of publicly traded, liquid investments. These liquid assets are intended to be available to purchase real estate-related investments in accordance with the Account’s investment objective and strategy and are also available to meet participant redemption requests and the Account’s expense needs (including, from time to time, obligations on debt). Significant participant transaction activity into or out of the Account’s units is generally not predictable, and wide fluctuations can occur as a result of macroeconomic or geopolitical conditions, the performance of equities or fixed income securities or general investor sentiment, regardless of the historical performance of the Account or of the performance of the real estate asset class generally.
In the second half of 2008 and in 2009, the Account experienced significant net participant transfers out of the Account, eventually causing the Account’s liquid assets to comprise less than 10% of the Account’s assets (on a net and total basis) throughout all of 2009 and into early 2010. Due in large part to this activity, the TIAA liquidity guarantee was initially executed in December 2008. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Liquidity Guarantee,” in the section of this report entitled "Management's Discussion and Analysis of the Account's Financial Conditions and Results of Operations." Among other things, this continued shortfall in the amount of liquid assets impaired management’s ability to consummate new transactions. If a significant amount of net participant transfers out of the Account were to recur, particularly in high volumes similar to those experienced in late 2008 and 2009, the Account may not have enough available liquid assets to pursue, or consummate, new investment opportunities presented to us that are otherwise attractive to the Account. This, in turn, could harm the Account’s returns. Even though net transfers out of the Account ceased in early 2010, there is no guarantee that redemption activity will not increase again, perhaps in a significant and rapid manner.
Alternatively, periods of significant net transfer activity into the Account can result in the Account holding a higher percentage of its net assets in publicly traded liquid non-real estate-related investments than the Account’s managers would target to hold under the Account’s long-term strategy. As of December 31, 2016,2017, the Account’s non-real estate-related liquid assets comprised 16.7% of its net assets and the Account's real estate-related liquid assets comprised 4.4%15.6% of its net assets. At times, the portion of the Account’s net assets invested in these types of liquid instruments may exceed 25%, particularly if the Account receives a large inflow of money in a short period of time, coupled with a lack of attractive real estate-related investments on the market. Also, large inflows from participant transactions often occur in times of appreciating real estate values and pricing, which can render it challenging to execute on some transactions at ideal prices.
In an appreciating real estate market, generally, this large percentage of assets held in liquid investments and not in real estate and real estate-related investments may impair the Account’s overall returns. This scenario may be exacerbated in a low interest rate environment for U.S. Treasury securities and related highly liquid securities, such as has existed since 2009 and which may persist in the future. In addition, to manage cash flow, the Account may temporarily hold a higher percentage of its net assets in liquid real estate-related securities, such as REIT and CMBS securities, than its long-term targeted holdings in such securities, particularly during and immediately following times of significant net transfer activity into the Account. Such holdings could increase the volatility of the Account’s returns.
Risks of Borrowing. The Account acquires some of its properties subject to existing financing and from time to time borrows new funds at the time of purchase. The Account may borrow pursuant to mortgages placed on individual properties or under an unsecured line of credit or credit facility. Also, the Account may from time to time place new leverage on, increase the leverage already placed on, or refinance maturing debt on, existing properties the Account owns. Under the Account’s current investment guidelines, the Account intends to maintain its loan-to-value ratio at or below 30% (measured at the time of incurrence and after giving effect thereto). As of December 31, 2016,2017, the Account’s loan-to-value ratio was approximately 15.0%15.5%. Also, the Account may borrow up to 70% of the then-current value of a particular property. Non-construction mortgage loans on a property will be non-recourse to the Account.
Among the risks of borrowing money, including borrowing under a line of credit or credit facility, or otherwise investing in a property subject to a mortgage are:
General Economic Conditions. General economic conditions, dislocations in the capital or credit markets generally or the market conditions then in effect in the real estate finance industry, may hinder the Account’s
ability to obtain financing or refinancing for its property investments on favorable terms or at all, regardless of
the quality of the Account’s property for which financing or refinancing is sought. Such unfavorable terms might include high interest rates, increased fees and costs and restrictive covenants applicable to the Account’s operation of the property. Longer term disruptions in the capital and credit markets as a result of uncertainty, changing or increased regulation, reduced alternatives, rising interest rates or failures of significant financial institutions could adversely affect our access to financing necessary to make profitable real estate investments. Our failure to obtain financing or refinancing on favorable terms due to the current state of the credit markets or otherwise could have an adverse impact on the returns of the Account. Also, the Account’s ability to secure financing may be impaired if negative marketplace effects, such as those which followed from the worldwide economic slowdown following the banking crisis of 2008 and the subsequent sovereign debt and banking difficulties recently experienced in parts of the eurozone, were to persist. These difficulties could include tighter lending standards instituted by banks and financial institutions, the reduced availability of credit facilities and project finance facilities from banks and the fall of consumer and/or business confidence.
Default Risk. The property or group of encumbered properties may not generate sufficient cash flow to support the debt service on the loan, the property may fail to meet certain financial or operating covenants contained in the loan documents and/or the property may have negative equity (i.e., the loan balance exceeds the value of the property) or inadequate equity. In addition, income from properties or investments or any other source of income for the Account may not generate sufficient cash flow to support the debt service on a line of credit or credit facility. In any of these circumstances, we (or a joint venture in which we invest) may default on the loan, including due to the failure to make required debt service payments when due. If a loan is in default, the Account or the venture may determine that it is not economically desirable and/or in the best interests of the Account to continue to make payments on the loan (including accessing other sources of funds to support debt service on the loan), and/or the Account or venture may not be able to otherwise remedy such default on commercially reasonable terms or at all. In either case, the lender then could accelerate the outstanding amount due on the loan and/or foreclose on the underlying property, in which case the Account could lose the value of its investment in the foreclosed property. Further, any such default or acceleration could trigger a default under loan agreements in respect of other Account properties pledged as security for the defaulted loan or other loans. Finally, any such default could subject the Account to the costs of litigation, increase the Account’s borrowing costs, or result in less favorable terms, with respect to financing future properties.properties or entering into future lines of credit or credit facilities.
Balloon Maturities. If the Account obtains a mortgage loan that involves a balloon payment, there is a risk that the Account may not be able to make the lump sum principal payment due under the loan at the end of the loan term, or otherwise obtain adequate refinancing on terms commercially acceptable to the Account or at all. The Account then may be forced to sell the property or other properties under unfavorable market conditions, restructure the loan on terms not advantageous to the Account, or default on its mortgage, resulting in the lender exercising its remedies, which may include repossession of the property, and the Account could lose the value of its investment in that property.
Variable Interest Rate Risk. If the Account obtains variable-rate loans, the Account’s returns may be volatile when interest rates are volatile. Further, to the extent that the Account takes out fixed-rate loans and interest rates subsequently decline, this may cause the Account to pay interest at above-market rates for a significant period of time. Any interest rate hedging activities the Account engages in to mitigate this risk may not fully protect the Account from the impact of interest rate volatility.
Variable Rate Demand Obligation (“VRDO”) Risk. To the extent the Account obtains financing pursuant to a variable rate demand obligation subject to periodic remarketing or similar mechanisms, the Account or the joint ventures in which it invests could face higher borrowing costs if the remarketing results in a higher prevailing interest rate. In addition, the terms of such variable rate obligations may allow the remarketing agent to cause the Account or venture to repay the loan on demand in the event insufficient market demand for such loans is present. In particular, RGM 42, LLC, a joint venture in which the Account holds a 70% interest, is the borrower under a VRDO loan program.
Valuation Risk. The market valuation of mortgage loans payable could have an adverse impact on the Account’s performance. Valuations of mortgage loans payable are generally based on the amount at which the liability could be transferred in a current transaction, exclusive of transaction costs, and such valuations are subject to
a number of assumptions and factors with respect to the loan and the underlying property, a change in any of which could cause the value of a mortgage loan to fluctuate.
A general disruption in the credit markets, such as the disruption experienced in 2008 and 2009, may aggravate some or all of these risks.
Risks of Joint Ownership. Investing in joint venture partnerships or other forms of joint property ownership may involve special risks, many of which are exacerbated when the consent of parties other than the Account is required to take action.
The co-venturer may have interests or goals inconsistent with those of the Account, including during times when a co-venturer may be experiencing financial difficulty. For example:
a co-venturer may desire a higher current income return on a particular investment than does the Account (which may be motivated by a longer-term investment horizon or exit strategy), or vice versa, which could cause difficulty in managing a particular asset;
a co-venturer may desire to maximize or minimize leverage in the venture, which may be at odds with the Account’s strategy;
a co-venturer may be more or less likely than the Account to agree to modify the terms of significant agreements (including loan agreements) binding the venture, or may significantly delay in reaching a determination whether to do so, each of which may frustrate the business objectives of the Account and/or lead to a default under a loan secured by a property owned by the venture; or
for reasons related to its own business strategy, a co-venturer may have different concentration standards as to its investments (geographically, by sector, or by tenant), which might frustrate the execution of the business plan for the joint venture.
The co-venturer may be unable to fulfill its obligations (such as to fund its pro rata share of committed capital, expenditures or guarantee obligations of the venture) during the term of such agreement or may become insolvent or bankrupt, any of which could expose the Account to greater liabilities than expected and frustrate the investment objective of the venture.
If a co-venturer doesn’t follow the Account’s instructions or adhere to the Account’s policies, the jointly owned properties, and consequently the Account, might be exposed to greater liabilities than expected.
The Account may have limited rights with respect to the underlying property pursuant to the terms of the joint venture, including the right to operate, manage or dispose of a property, and a co-venturer could have approval rights over the marketing or the ultimate sale of the underlying property.
The terms of the Account’s ventures often provide for complicated agreements which can impede our ability to direct the sale of the property owned by the venture at times the Account views most favorable. One such agreement is a buy-sell right, which may force us to make a decision (either to buy our co-venturer’s interest or sell our interest to our co-venturer) at inopportune times.
A co-venturer can make it harder for the Account to transfer its equity interest in the venture to a third party, which could adversely impact the valuation of the Account’s interest in the venture.
To the extent the Account serves as the general partner or managing member in a venture, it may owe certain contractual or other duties to the co-venturer, including fiduciary duties, which may present perceived or actual conflicts of interest in the management of the underlying assets. Such an arrangement could also subject the Account to liability to third parties in the performance of its duties as a general partner or managing member.
Risks of Developing or Redeveloping Real Estate or Buying Recently Constructed Properties. If the Account chooses to develop or redevelop a property or buys a recently constructed property, it may face the following risks:
There may be delays or unexpected increases in the cost of property development, redevelopment and construction due to strikes, bad weather, material shortages, increases in material and labor costs or other events.
There are risks associated with potential underperformance or non-performance by, and/or solvency of a contractor we select or other third party vendors involved in developing or redeveloping the property.
If the Account were viewed as developing or redeveloping underperforming properties, suffering losses on our investments, or defaulting on any loans on our properties, our reputation could be damaged. Damage to our
reputation could make it more difficult to successfully develop or acquire properties in the future and to continue to grow and expand our relationships with our lenders, venture partners and tenants.
Because external factors may have changed from when the project was originally conceived (e.g., slower growth in the local economy, higher interest rates, overbuilding in the area, or changes in the regulatory and permitting environment), the property may not attract tenants on the schedule we originally planned and/or may not operate at the income and expense levels first projected.
Risks with Purchase-Leaseback Transactions. To the extent the Account invested in a purchase-leaseback transaction, the major risk is that the third party lessee will be unable to make required payments to the Account. If the leaseback interest is subordinate to other interests in the real property, such as a first mortgage or other lien, the risk to the Account increases because the lessee may have to pay the senior lienholder to prevent foreclosure before it pays the Account. If the lessee defaults or the leaseback is terminated prematurely, the Account might not recover its investment unless the property is sold or leased on favorable terms.
Real Estate Regulatory Risks. Government regulation at the federal, state and local levels, including, without limitation, zoning laws, rent control or rent stabilization laws, laws regulating housing on the Account’s multifamily properties, the Americans with Disabilities Act, property taxes and fiscal, accounting, environmental or other government policies, could operate or change in a way that adversely affects the Account and its properties. For example, these regulations could raise the cost of acquiring, owning, improving or maintaining properties, present barriers to otherwise desirable investment opportunities or make it harder to sell, rent, finance, or refinance properties either on economically desirable terms, or at all, due to the increased costs associated with regulatory compliance.
Environmental Risks. The Account may be liable for damage to the environment or injury to individuals caused by hazardous substances used or found on its properties. Under various environmental regulations, the Account may also be liable, as a current or previous property owner or mortgagee, for the cost of removing or cleaning up hazardous substances found on a property, even if it did not know of and was not responsible for the hazardous substances. If any hazardous substances are present or the Account does not properly clean up any hazardous substances, or if the Account fails to comply with regulations requiring it to actively monitor the business activities on its premises, the Account may have difficulty selling or renting a property or be liable for monetary penalties. Further, environmental laws may impose restrictions on the manner in which a property may be used, the tenants which may be allowed, or the manner in which businesses may be operated, which may require the Account to expend funds in order to comply with these laws. These laws may also cause the most ideal use of the property to differ from that originally contemplated and as a result could impair the Account’s returns. The cost of any required clean-up relating to a single real estate investment (including remediating contaminated property) and the Account’s potential liability for environmental damage, including paying personal injury claims and performing under indemnification obligations to third parties, could exceed the value of the Account’s investment in a property, the property’s value, or in an extreme case, a significant portion of the Account’s assets. Finally, while the Account may from time to time acquire third-party insurance related to environmental risks, such insurance coverage may be inadequate to cover the full cost of any loss and would cause the Account to be reliant on the financial health of our third-party insurer at the time any such claim is submitted.
Uninsurable Losses. Certain catastrophic losses (e.g., from earthquakes, wars, terrorist acts, nuclear accidents, hurricanes, wind, floods or environmental or industrial hazards or accidents) may be uninsurable or so expensive to insure against that it is economically disadvantageous to buy insurance for them. Further, the terms and conditions of the insurance coverage the Account has on its properties, in conjunction with the type of loss actually suffered at a property, may subject the property, or the Account as a whole, to a cap on insurance proceeds that is less than the loss or losses suffered. If a disaster that we have not insured against occurs, if the insurance contains a high deductible, and/or if the aggregate insurance proceeds for a particular type of casualty are capped, the Account could lose some of its original investment and any future profits from the property. Also, the Account may not have sufficient access to internal or external sources of funding to repair or reconstruct a damaged property to the extent insurance proceeds do not cover the full loss. In addition, some leases may permit a tenant to terminate its obligations in certain situations, regardless of whether those events are fully covered by insurance. In that case, the Account would not receive rental income from the property while that tenant’s space is vacant, and any such vacancy might impact the value of that property. Finally, as with respect to all third-party insurance, we are reliant on the continued financial health of such insurers and their ability to pay on valid claims. If the financial health of an insurer were to deteriorate quickly, we
may not be able to find adequate coverage from another carrier on favorable terms, which could adversely impact the Account’s returns.
RISKS OF INVESTING IN REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST SECURITIES
The Account invests in registered and unregistered REIT securities for diversification, liquidity management and other purposes. The Account’s investment in REITs may also increase, as a percentage of net assets, during periods in which the Account is experiencing large net inflow activity, in particular due to net participant transfers into the Account. As of December 31, 2016,2017, REIT securities comprised approximately 4.4%5.0% of the Account’s net assets. Investments in REIT securities are part of the Account’s real estate-related investment strategy and are subject to many of the same general risks associated with direct real property ownership. In particular, equity REITs may be affected by changes in the value of the underlying properties owned by the entity, while mortgage REITs may be affected by the quality of any credit extended. In addition to these risks, because REIT investments are securities and generally publicly traded, they may be exposed to market risk and potentially significant price volatility due to changing conditions in the financial markets and, in particular, changes in overall interest rates, regardless of the value of the underlying real estate such REIT may own. Also, sales of REIT securities by the Account for liquidity management purposes may occur at times when values of such securities have declined and it is otherwise an inopportune time to sell the security. Volatility in REITs can cause significant fluctuations in the Account’s AUV on a daily basis, as they are correlated to equity markets which have experienced significant day to day fluctuations over the past few years.
REITs do not pay federal income taxes if they distribute most of their earnings to their shareholders and meet other tax requirements. Many of the requirements to qualify as a REIT, however, are highly technical and complex. Failure to qualify as a REIT results in tax consequences, as well as disqualification from operating as a REIT for a period of time. Consequently, if the Account invests in securities of a REIT that later fails to qualify as a REIT, this may adversely affect the performance of our investment.
RISKS OF MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES
The Account from time to time has invested in mortgage-backed securities and may in the future invest in such securities. Mortgage-backed securities, such as CMBS, are subject to many of the same general risks inherent in real estate investing, making mortgage loans and investing in debt securities. The underlying mortgage loans may experience defaults with greater frequency than projected when such mortgages were underwritten, which would impact the values of these securities, and could hamper our ability to sell such securities. In particular, these types of investments may be subject to prepayment risk or extension risk (i.e., the risk that borrowers will repay the loans earlier or later than anticipated). If the underlying mortgage assets experience faster than anticipated prepayments of principal, the Account could fail to recoup some or all of its initial investment in these securities, since the original price paid by the Account was based in part on assumptions regarding the receipt of interest payments. If the underlying mortgage assets are repaid later than anticipated, the Account could lose the opportunity to reinvest the anticipated cash flows at a time when interest rates might be rising. The rate of prepayments depends on a variety of geographic, social and other functions, including prevailing market interest rates and general economic factors. Further, it is possible that the U.S. government may change its support of, and policies regarding, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and, thus, the Account may be unable to acquire agency mortgage-backed securities in the future and even if the Account so acquired them, such changes may result in a negative effect on the pricing of such securities. Other policy changes impacting Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and/or U.S. government programs related to mortgages that may be implemented in the future could create market uncertainty and affect the actual or perceived credit quality of issued securities, adversely affecting mortgage-backed securities through an increased risk of loss.
Importantly, the fair market value of these securities is also highly sensitive to changes in interest rates, liquidity of the secondary market and economic conditions impacting financial institutions and the credit markets generally. Note that the potential for appreciation, which could otherwise be expected to result from a decline in interest rates, may be limited by any increased prepayments. Further, volatility and disruption in the mortgage market and credit markets generally (such as was the case in 2008 and 2009) may cause there to be a very limited or even no secondary market for these securities and they therefore may be harder to sell than other securities.
RISKS OF U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY SECURITIES AND CORPORATE OBLIGATIONS
The Account invests in securities issued by U.S. government agencies and U.S. government-sponsored entities. Some of these issuers may not have their securities backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, which could adversely affect the pricing and value of such securities. Also, the Account may invest in corporate obligations (such
as commercial paper) and while the Account seeks out such holdings in short-term, higher-quality liquid instruments, the ability of the Account to sell these securities may be uncertain, particularly when there are general dislocations in the finance or credit markets. Any such volatility could have a negative impact on the value of these securities. Further, transaction activity may fluctuate significantly from time to time, which could impair the Account’s ability to dispose of a security at a favorable time, regardless of the credit quality of the underlying issuer. Also, inherent with investing in any corporate obligation is the risk that the credit quality of the issuer will deteriorate, which could cause the obligations to be downgraded and hamper the value or the liquidity of these securities. Finally, any further downgrades or threatened downgrades of the credit rating for U.S. government obligations generally could impact the pricing and liquidity of agency securities or corporate obligations in a manner which could impact the value of the Account’s units.
RISKS OF LIQUID INVESTMENTS
The Account’s investments in liquid investments (whether real estate-related, such as REITs, CMBS or some loans receivable, or non-real estate-related, such as cash equivalents and government securities, and whether debt or equity), are subject to the following general risks:
Financial / Credit Risk. The risk, for debt securities, that the issuer will not be able to pay principal and interest when due (and/or declare bankruptcy or be subject to receivership) and, for equity securities such as common or preferred stock, that the issuer’s current earnings will fall or that its overall financial soundness will decline, reducing the security’s value.
Market Volatility Risk. The risk that the Account’s investments will experience price volatility due to changing conditions in the financial markets even regardless of the credit quality or financial condition of the underlying issuer. This risk is particularly acute to the extent the Account holds equity securities, which have experienced significant short-term price volatility in recent years. Also, to the extent the Account holds debt securities, changes in overall interest rates can cause price fluctuations.
Interest Rate Volatility. The risk that interest rate volatility may affect the Account’s current income from an investment. As interest rates rise, the value of certain debt securities (such as those bearing lower fixed rates) held by the Account is likely to decrease. As of the date of this report, interest rates in the United States are at or near historic lows, which may increase the Account’s exposure to risks associated with rising interest rates.
Deposit / Money Market Risk. The risk that, to the extent the Account’s cash held in bank deposit accounts exceeds federally insured limits as to that bank, the Account could experience losses if banks fail. In addition, there is some risk that investments held in money market accounts or funds can suffer losses.
Further, to the extent that a significant portion of the Account’s net assets, at any particular time, consist of cash, cash equivalents and non-real estate-related liquid securities, the Account’s returns may suffer as compared to the return that could have been generated by more profitable real estate-related investments. Such a potential negative impact on returns may be exacerbated in times of low prevailing interest rates payable on many classes of liquid securities, such as is the case as of the date hereof and which may persist in the future.
RISKS OF FOREIGN INVESTMENTS
In addition to other investment risks noted above, foreign investments present the following special risks:
The value of foreign investments or rental income can increase or decrease due to changes or fluctuations in currency exchange rates, imposition of currency exchange control or market control regulations, possible expropriation or confiscatory taxation, political, social, diplomatic and economic developments and foreign regulations. The Account translates into U.S. dollars purchases and sales of securities, income receipts and expense payments made in foreign currencies at the exchange rates prevailing on the respective dates of the transactions. The effect of any changes in currency exchange rates on foreign mezzanine (including U.K.) debt or other foreign debt investments and mortgage loans payable is included in the Account’s net realized and unrealized gains and losses. As such, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, even if hedged, may impair or reduce the Account’s returns.Account's returns and result in poorer overall performance of the Account than if it had not acquired such foreign investments or entered into any foreign currency hedging transactions.
The Account may, but is not required to, hedge its exposure to changes in currency rates, which could involve extra costs. Further, any hedging activities might not be successful. Such hedges may also be subject to valuation changes. In addition, a lender to a foreign property owned by the Account could require the Account to compensate it for its loss associated with such lender’s hedging activities.
Non-U.S. jurisdictions may impose withholding taxes on the Account as a result of its investment activity in that jurisdiction. TIAA may be eligible for a foreign tax credit in respect of such tax paid by the Account and such credit (if available to TIAA) would be reimbursed to the Account. However, there may be circumstances where TIAA is unable to receive some or all of the benefit of a foreign tax credit and the Account would thus not receive reimbursement, which could harm the value of the Account’s units.
Foreign real estate markets may have different liquidity and volatility attributes than U.S. markets.
The regulatory environment in non-U.S. jurisdictions may disfavor owners and operators of real estate investment properties, resulting in less predictable and/or economically harmful outcomes if the Account were to face a significant dispute with a tenant or with a regulator itself.
The Account may be subject to increased risk of regulatory scrutiny pursuant to U.S. federal statutes, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which, among other things, requires robust compliance and oversight programs to help prevent violations. The costs associated with maintaining such programs, in addition to costs associated with a potential regulatory inquiry, could impair the Account’s returns and divert management’s attention from other Account activities.
It may be more difficult to obtain and collect a judgment on foreign investments than on domestic investments, and the costs associated with contesting claims relating to foreign investments may exceed those costs associated with a similar claim on domestic investments.
We may invest from time to time in securities issued by (i) entities domiciled in foreign countries, (ii) domestic affiliates of such entities and/or (3) foreign domiciled affiliates of domestic entities. Such investments could be subject to the risks associated with investments subject to foreign regulation, including political unrest or the seizure, expropriation, repatriation or nationalization of the issuer’s assets. These events could depress the value of such securities and/or make such securities harder to sell on favorable terms, if at all.
RISKS OF INVESTING IN MORTGAGE LOANS AND RELATED INVESTMENTS
The Account’s investment strategy includes, to a limited extent, investments in mortgage loans (i.e., the Account serving as lender).
General Risks of Mortgage Loans. The Account will be subject to the risks inherent in making mortgage loans, including:
The borrower may default on the loan, requiring that the Account foreclose on the underlying property to protect the value of its mortgage loan. Since its mortgage loans are usually non-recourse, the Account must rely solely on the value of a property for its security. In addition, there is a risk of delay in exercising any contractual remedies due to actions of the borrower, including, without limitation, bankruptcy or insolvency of the borrower.
The larger the mortgage loan compared to the value of the property securing it, the greater the loan’s risk. Upon default, the Account may not be able to sell the property for its estimated or appraised value. Also, certain liens on the property, such as mechanic’s or tax liens, may have priority over the Account’s security interest.
A deterioration in the financial condition of tenants, which could be caused by general or local economic conditions or other factors beyond the control of the Account, or the bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant,
may adversely affect the income of a property, which could increase the likelihood that the borrower will default under its obligations.
The borrower may be unable to make a lump sum principal payment due under a mortgage loan at the end of the loan term, unless it can refinance the mortgage loan with another lender.
If interest rates are volatile during the loan period, the Account’s variable-rate mortgage loans could have volatile yields. Further, to the extent the Account makes mortgage loans with fixed interest rates, it may receive lower yields than that which is then available in the market if interest rates rise generally.
Interest Rate Risk. The risk that the value or yield of fixed-income investments may decline if interest rates change. In general, when prevailing interest rates decline, the market values of outstanding fixed-income investments (particularly those paying a fixed rate of interest) tend to increase while yields on similar newly issued fixed-income investments tend to decrease, which could adversely affect the Account’s income. Conversely, when prevailing interest rates increase, the market values of outstanding fixed-income investments (particularly those paying a fixed rate of interest) tend to decline while yields on similar newly issued fixed-income investments tend to increase. If a fixed-income investment pays a floating or variable rate of interest, changes in prevailing interest rates may increase or decrease the investment’s yield. Fixed-income investments with longer durations tend to be more sensitive to interest rate changes than shorter-term investments. Interest rate risk is generally heightened during periods when prevailing interest rates are low or negative. During periods of very low or negative interest rates, a fixed-income investment may not be able to maintain positive returns. In general, changing interest rates could have unpredictable effects on the markets and may expose fixed-income and related markets to heightened volatility.
Extension Risk. The risk that during periods of rising interest rates, borrowers pay off their mortgage loans later than expected, preventing the Account from reinvesting principal proceeds at higher interest rates, resulting in less income than potentially available. These risks are normally present in mortgage- backed securities and other asset-backed securities. For example, homeowners have the option to prepay their mortgages. Therefore, the duration of a security backed by home mortgages can lengthen depending on homeowner prepayment activity. A decline in the prepayment rate and the resulting increase in duration of fixed-income securities held by the Account can result in losses to the Account.
Prepayment Risks. The Account’s mortgage loan investments will usually be subject to the risk that the borrower repays a loan early. Also, the Account may be unable to reinvest the proceeds at as high an interest rate as the original mortgage loan rate, resulting in a decline in income.
Interest Limitations. The interest rate we charge on mortgage loans may inadvertently violate state usury laws that limit rates, if, for example, state law changes during the loan term. If this happens, the Account could incur penalties or may be unable to enforce payment of the loan.
Risks of Investing in Domestic and Foreign Mezzanine Loans. The Account may invest from time to time in domestic and foreign (including U.K.) mezzanine loans to entities which own real estate assets. Generally these loans will be secured by a pledge of the equity securities of the entity, but not by a first lien security interest in the property itself. As such, the Account’s recovery in the event of an adverse circumstance at the property (such as a default under a mortgage loan on the property) will be subordinated to the recovery available to the first lien mortgage lender(s) to the property. The Account’s remedy may solely consist of foreclosing on the equity interest in the entity owning the property, and that equity interest will be junior in right of a recovery to a loan secured by the property owned by the entity. Also, as a subordinated lender, the Account may have limited rights to exercise control over the process by which the mortgage loan is restructured or the property is liquidated following a default. Any of these circumstances may result in the Account being unable to recover some or all of its original investment.
Risks of Currency Hedging Strategies for Foreign Mezzanine Loans. In managing foreign (including U.K.) mezzanine or other foreign debt, the Account may use or enter into forward currency contracts, currency swaps and may buy or sell put and call options and futures contracts on foreign currencies as well as other derivatives transactions in order to hedge against the risks of exchange rate uncertainties and currency fluctuations impacting the Account’s foreign portfolio investments. Changes in exchange rates and exchange control regulations may increase or reduce the value of foreign (including U.K.) mezzanine or other debt. Currency hedging and similar transactions involve special risks and may limit potential gains due to increases in a currency’s value. Unanticipated changes in interest rates, domestic or foreign securities prices or currency exchange rates may result in poorer overall performance of the Account than if it had not entered into any such currency-related transactions. In addition, the Account could incur additional costs of paying hedge unwind fees if it has to terminate cross-currency swaps prematurely due to early repayment of foreign mezzanine or other foreign debt. The Account does not intend to speculate in foreign currency exchange transactions or forward currency contracts.
Risks of Participations. To the extent the Account invested in a participating mortgage, the following additional risks would apply:
The participation feature, in tying the Account’s returns to the performance of the underlying asset, might generate insufficient returns to make up for the higher interest rate the loan would have obtained without the participation feature.
In very limited circumstances, a court may characterize the Account’s participation interest as a partnership or joint venture with the borrower and the Account could lose the priority of its security interest or become liable for the borrower’s debts.
RISKS OF SECURITIES LENDING
In lending its securities, the Account bears the market risk with respect to the investment of collateral and the risk the borrower or Agent may default on its contractual obligations to the Account. Each Agent bears the risk that the borrower may default on its obligation to return the loaned securities, as the Agent is contractually obligated to indemnify the Account if, at the time of a default by a borrower, some or all of the loaned securities have not been returned.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST WITHIN TIAA
General.Officers of TIAA that provide advice with respect to the Account may also provide investment advice with respect to investments owned by TIAA, and investments managed by affiliates of TIAA. In addition, TIAA and its affiliates offer (and may in the future offer) other accounts and investment products that are not managed under an “at cost” expense structure. Therefore, TIAA and its officers may at times face various conflicts of interest. Many of the officers of TIAA involved in performing services to the Account will have competing demands on their time. The officers will devote such time to the affairs of the Account as TIAA’s management determines, in its sole discretion exercising good faith, is necessary to properly service the Account. TIAA believes that it has sufficient personnel to discharge its responsibility to the Account, the TIAA General Account, and other accounts to avoid conflicts of interest. TIAA or its affiliates may form and/or manage other real estate investment vehicles in the future and we will take steps to assure that those vehicles are integrated into appropriate conflict of interest policies. TIAA does not accept acquisition or placement fees for the services it provides to the Account. (Each of the Account, the TIAA General Account, and such other accounts, funds or real estate investment vehicles that are established or may be established by TIAA or its affiliates in the future, are herein referred to as an “account.”)
Allocation Procedures. TIAA and its affiliates (including TIAA-CREF Alternatives Advisors, LLC and Teachers Advisors, LLC, its wholly-owned subsidiaries and registered investment advisers, and TH Real Estate Global, its wholly-owned subsidiary) have interests in(“THRE”) and other subsidiaries of Nuveen, LLC (“Nuveen”)) allocate new investments (including real property investments and commercial mortgages, but generally not real estate programs andlimited partnership investments) among the accounts and also engage(including the Account) in other business activities. As such, they will have conflicts of interest in allocating their time between the Account’s business and these other activities. Also, the Account may be buying properties at the same timeaccordance with a written allocation procedure as TIAA affiliates that may have similar investment objectives to those of the Account. There is also a risk that TIAA will choose a property that provides lower returns to the Account than a property purchasedadopted by TIAA and its affiliates. Further,such affiliates and modified from time to time.
Under the allocation procedure, an internal real estate acquisitions team adds transactions as they are identified into an internal deal pipeline. Proposed transactions in the pipeline are presented at regular internal real estate review meetings, at which the portfolio managers for each of the accounts will evaluate acquisition opportunities which conform to the investment strategy of the applicable account. If only one portfolio manager is interested in making a bid to pursue the transaction, the transaction is allocated to that account and there is no change in the rotation order. However, if more than one account expresses an interest in a transaction in a particular sector, a strict rotation system will be used so that the accounts are treated equitably and transactions are impartially allocated.
Under the rotation system, an allocations coordinator will allocate a transaction to the interested account in the top most position of the rotation for a specific real estate sector, but the Account will likely acquirethen drop to the bottom of the rotation for new or additional investment opportunities in that sector. This rotation system is employed on a sector-by-sector basis for each of the office, retail, industrial, multi-family, student housing and other sectors; and each sector has its own rotation. As a result, an account (including the Account) could, at any one time, be at the top or the bottom of the rotation for new investment opportunities in any one or all five of the sectors in which the Account could invest. If an account chooses not to pursue a transaction that has been allocated to it, the acquisitions team may bring the transaction back into the main rotation. New funds or accounts with the ability to invest in transactions without a co-investor (i.e., “stand alone” accounts), will be added to the main rotation. Where such new funds or accounts are a co-investor with TIAA as a joint venture partner, and the portfolio manager for TIAA or THRE does not have discretion to deploy investors’ capital for acquisitions within such mandate (i.e., a non-discretionary mandate), such mandates will be part of a sub-rotation within the account that was allocated the transaction and will not have a separate place in the main rotation. New funds or accounts where TIAA is a joint venture partner and the portfolio manager for TIAA or THRE affiliate does have discretion to deploy investors’ capital for acquisitions within such mandate (i.e., a fully discretionary mandate), regardless of the ownership percentage, are added to the main rotation.
Also, there may be circumstances where multiple properties are presented to TIAA for sale as a single acquisition opportunity, and the proposed price is inclusive of all the properties. If more than one account has interest in geographic areas whereall or a portion of such bundled acquisition opportunity, the acquisitions team will investigate with the seller whether the properties can be unbundled and offered to the accounts on an individual basis and the sector-based rotation system described above will apply to the allocation of such unbundled properties.
The allocation procedure contains substantive requirements for proceeding through the different stages of the bidding process prior to allocation to preserve the fairness, equitability and transparency of the transaction. The procedure also provides a process for handling exceptions to the allocation process when requested by a portfolio manager for the accounts.
The allocation procedure is overseen and monitored by senior officers of TIAA and its affiliates, own or manage properties. In addition, the Account may desireincluding THRE and other subsidiaries of Nuveen, pursuant to sell a property at the same time another TIAA affiliate is selling a property in an overlapping market. Conflicts could also arise because some properties owned or managed by TIAA and its affiliates may compete with the Account’s properties for tenants. Among other things, if one of the TIAA entities attracts a tenant that the Account is competing for, the Account could suffer a loss of revenue due to delays in locating another suitable tenant. TIAA has adopted allocationNuveen’s existing compliance policies and procedures applicable to the purchasing conflicts scenario, but the resolution of such conflicts may be economically disadvantageous to the Account. As a result of TIAA’s and its affiliates’ obligations to TIAA itself and to other current and potential investment vehicles sponsored by TIAA affiliates with similar objectives to those of the Account, there is no assurance that the Account will be able to take advantage of every attractive investment opportunity that otherwise is in accordance with the Account’s investment objectives.processes.
Liquidity Guarantee. In addition, as discussed elsewhere in this report, the TIAA General Account provides a liquidity guarantee to the Account. While an independent fiduciary is responsible for establishing a “trigger point” (a percentage of TIAA’s ownership of liquidity units beyond which TIAA’s ownership may be reduced at the fiduciary’s direction), there is no express cap on the amount TIAA may be obligated to fund under this guarantee. Further, the Account’s independent fiduciary oversees any redemption of TIAA liquidity units. TIAA’s ownership of liquidity units (including the potential for changes in its levels of ownership in the future) from time to time could result in the perception that TIAA is taking into account its own economic interests while serving as investment manager for the Account. In particular, the value of TIAA’s liquidity units fluctuates in the same manner as the value of accumulation units held by all participants. Any perception of a conflict of interest could cause participants to transfer accumulations out of the Account to another investment option, which could have an adverse impact on the Account’s ability to act most optimally upon its investment strategy. For a discussion of the relevant allocation policies and procedures TIAA has established as well as a summary of other conflicts of interest which may arise as a result of TIAA’s management of the Account, see “Establishing and Managing the Account—the Role of TIAA—Conflicts of Interest,” in the Account’s prospectus.
NO OPPORTUNITY FOR PRIOR REVIEW OF TRANSACTIONS
Investors do not have the opportunity to evaluate the economic or financial merit of the purchase, sale or financing of a property or other investment before the Account completes the transaction, so investors rely solely on TIAA’s judgment and ability to select investments consistent with the Account’s investment objective and policies. Further, the Account may change its investment objective and pursue specific investments in accordance with any such amended investment objective without the consent of the Account’s investors.
RISKS OF REGISTRATION UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940
The Account has not registered, and management intends to continue to operate the Account so that it will not have to register, as an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”). If the Account were obligated to register as an investment company, the Account would have to comply with a variety of substantive requirements under the Investment Company Act that impose, among other things, limitations on capital structure, restrictions on certain investments, compliance with reporting, record keeping, voting and proxy disclosure requirements and other rules and regulations that could significantly increase its operating expenses and reduce its operating flexibility. To maintain compliance with the exemptions from the Investment Company Act, the Account may be unable to sell assets it would otherwise want to sell and may be unable to purchase securities it would otherwise want to purchase, which might materially adversely impact the Account’s performance.
CYBERSECURITY RISKS
With the increased use of technologies such as the Internet to conduct business, the Account and its service providers (including, but not limited to, TIAA, Services, the independent fiduciary and the Account’s custodian and financial intermediaries) are susceptible to cybersecurity risks. In general, cyber-securitycybersecurity attacks can result from infection by computer viruses or other malicious software or from deliberate actions or unintentional events, including gaining unauthorized access through “hacking” or other means to digital systems, networks, or devices that are used to service the Account’s operations in order to misappropriate assets or sensitive information, corrupt data, or cause operational disruption. Cybersecurity attacks can also be carried out in a manner that does not require gaining unauthorized access, including by carrying out a “denial-of-service” attack on the Account or its service providers’ websites. In addition, authorized persons could inadvertently or intentionally release and possibly destroy confidential or proprietary information stored on the Account’s systems or the systems of its service providers.
Cybersecurity failures by the Account or any of its service providers, or the issuers of any portfolio securities in which the Account invests (e.g., issuers of REIT stocks or debt securities), have the ability to result in disruptions to and impacts on business operations and may adversely affect the Account and the value of your accumulation units. Such disruptions or impacts may result in: financial losses; interference with the processing of contract transactions, including the processing of orders from TIAA’s website; interfere with the Account’s ability to calculate AUVs; barriers to trading and order processing; Account contract owners’ inability to transact business with the Account; violations of applicable federal and state privacy or other laws, regulatory fines, penalties, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensation costs, or additional compliance costs. The Account may incur additional, incremental costs to prevent
and mitigate the risks of cybersecurity attacks or incidents in the future. The Account and its contract owners could be negatively impacted by such cyber-attacks or incidents. Although the Account has established business continuity plans and risk-based processes and controls to address such cybersecurity risks, there are inherent limitations in such plans and systems in part due to the evolving nature of technology and cybersecurity attack tactics. As a result, it is possible that the Account or the Account’s service providers will not be able to adequately identify or prepare for all cybersecurity attacks. In addition, the Account cannot directly control the cybersecurity plans or systems implemented by its service providers.
ENACTED TAX LEGISLATION
On December 22, 2017, H.R. 1 was enacted into law as P.L. 115-77, popularly known as the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” (the “Act”), permanently cutting the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, temporarily reducing individual tax rates and providing a partial deduction for certain income earned by pass-through entities until 2026, while making fundamental changes to the taxation of foreign persons and income. To broaden the income tax base to pay for the rate cuts and pass-through income deduction, many corporate deductions have been eliminated or modified and many individual deductions suspended until 2026. With most provisions effective on January 1, 2018 the Joint Committee on Taxation (“JCT”) estimates that the Act will increase the federal deficit by approximately $1.5 trillion over 10 years. The JCT also estimates that the Act will result in some economic growth over the same period. While the Act is expected to have effects on the economy that will impact the performance of real estate and credit markets, those effects cannot be predicted.
Certain provisions of the Act should have more direct impacts on real estate and credit markets. A limitation on the aggregate deduction for state and local income taxes and property taxes to $10,000 and certain limitations on the deduction for qualified residence interest could impact the housing market in certain areas, affecting the performance of certain real estate investments. Limitations on deductibility of business interest and increased expensing provisions could impact the market for commercial real estate. Other provisions of the Act may also impact real estate or credit markets, and ultimately the Account, in certain circumstances and in ways that cannot be predicted. Future guidance to be issued by the Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service may alter these effects.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
THE PROPERTIES—GENERAL
In the table below, participants will find general information about each of the Account’s investments as of December 31, 2016.2017. The Account’s investments include both properties that are wholly-owned by the Account and properties owned by the Account’s joint venture investments. Certain investments include a portfolio of properties.
| | | Property | Location | Year Built | Year Purchased | Rentable Area (Sq. ft.)(1) | Percent Leased | Annual Avg. Base Rent Per Leased Sq. Ft.(2) | Fair Value(3) (in millions) | Location | Year Built | Year Purchased | Rentable Area (Sq. ft.)(1) | Percent Leased | Annual Avg. Base Rent Per Leased Sq. Ft.(2) | Fair Value(3) (in millions) |
OFFICE PROPERTIES | | 1001 Pennsylvania Ave | Washington, D.C. | 1987 | 2004 | 779,521 |
| 81.3 | % | $ | 50.35 |
| $ | 810.0 |
| (4) | Washington, D.C. | 1987 | 2004 | 780,425 | 79.9% | $ | 51.84 |
| $ | 785.0 |
| (4) |
Colorado Center(5) | Santa Monica, CA | 1984 | 2004 | 1,127,893 |
| 67.4 | % | 40.61 |
| 567.8 |
| | |
| Fourth & Madison | Seattle, WA | 2002 | 2004 | 845,533 |
| 88.2 | % | 27.18 |
| 521.0 |
| (4) | Seattle, WA | 2002 | 2004 | 845,533 | 86.7% | 25.18 |
| 530.0 |
| (4) |
| 501 Boylston Street | | Boston, MA | 1940, 1961 | 2006 | 610,075 | 97.4% | 51.41 |
| 505.2 |
| (4) |
| 99 High Street | Boston, MA | 1971 | 2005 | 732,432 |
| 86.8 | % | 49.41 |
| 514.1 |
| | Boston, MA | 1971 | 2005 | 732,432 | 90.1% | 48.02 |
| 502.1 |
| |
| 501 Boylston Street | Boston, MA | 1940, 1961 | 2006 | 610,075 |
| 98.0 | % | 48.05 |
| 490.3 |
| (4) | |
| 780 Third Avenue | New York, NY | 1984 | 1999 | 499,144 |
| 90.8 | % | 55.10 |
| 425.0 |
| (4) | New York, NY | 1984 | 1999 | 489,985 | 82.1% | 59.90 |
| 427.0 |
| (4) |
| 701 Brickell Avenue | Miami, FL | 1986 | 2002 | 677,667 |
| 90.7 | % | 34.97 |
| 380.7 |
| (4) | Miami, FL | 1986 | 2002 | 677,667 | 94.5% | 24.06 |
| 368.5 |
| (4) |
| Lincoln Centre | Dallas, TX | 1984 | 2005 | 1,625,465 |
| 86.6 | % | 22.49 |
| 347.0 |
| | Dallas, TX | 1984 | 2005 | 1,625,465 | 88.1% | 22.99 |
| 358.0 |
| |
Four Oaks Place LP(13) | Houston, TX | 1983, 2016 | 2012 | 2,332,915 |
| 91.9 | % | 22.71 |
| 342.3 |
| | |
| 55 Second Street | | San Francisco, CA | 2002 | 2014 | 379,328 | 77.6% | 49.58 |
| 355.5 |
| (4) |
Colorado Center(5) | | Santa Monica, CA | 1984 | 2004 | 1,128,745 | 82.4% | 55.81 |
| 351.0 |
| |
Four Oaks Place(13) | | Houston, TX | 1983, 2016 | 2012 | 2,333,310 | 81.6% | 24.53 |
| 338.7 |
| |
| 1900 K Street NW | Washington, D.C. | 1996 | 2004 | 345,781 |
| 98.5 | % | 46.32 |
| 335.0 |
| (4) | Washington, D.C. | 1996 | 2004 | 345,781 | 98.5% | 47.78 |
| 330.0 |
| (4) |
| 55 Second Street | San Francisco, CA | 2002 | 2014 | 379,328 |
| 92.7 | % | 39.66 |
| 335.0 |
| (4) | |
| Wilshire Rodeo Plaza | Beverly Hills, CA | 1935, 1984 | 2006 | 251,076 |
| 73.7 | % | 63.41 |
| 320.7 |
| | Beverly Hills, CA | 1935, 1984 | 2006 | 252,305 | 78.2% | 65.71 |
| 327.8 |
| |
400 Fairview(12) | | Seattle, WA | 2015 | 341,868 | 97.5% | 35.72 |
| 263.7 |
| |
Foundry Square II(17) | | San Francisco, CA | 2002 | 2014 | 508,527 | 98.5% | 55.02 |
| 262.7 |
| |
| 21 Penn Plaza | New York, NY | 1931, 2012- 2014 | 2014 | 373,335 |
| 93.6 | % | 41.52 |
| 275.2 |
| | New York, NY | 1931, 2012-2014 | 2014 | 373,335 | 94.2% | 29.05 |
| 261.2 |
| |
400 Fairview(12) | Seattle, WA | 2015 | 346,904 |
| 77.9 | % | 33.04 |
| 243.6 |
| | |
| 1401 H Street NW | Washington, D.C. | 1992 | 2006 | 350,787 |
| 86.1 | % | 45.51 |
| 230.0 |
| (4) | |
One Boston Place(6) | Boston, MA | 1970 | 2002 | 804,444 |
| 79.9 | % | 45.80 |
| 224.2 |
| | Boston, MA | 1970 | 2002 | 804,444 | 79.9% | 44.59 |
| 229.1 |
| |
| Fort Point Portfolio | Boston, MA | 1890-1920, 1986-2010 | 2016 | 406,208 |
| 94.7 | % | 35.46 |
| 223.0 |
| | Boston, MA | 1890-1920, 1986-2010 | 2016 | 406,754 | 92.7% | 40.20 |
| 223.1 |
| |
| 837 Washington | New York, NY | 1938, 2012- 2014 | 2015 | 55,497 |
| 100.0 | % | 170.21 |
| 215.0 |
| | |
Foundry Square II(17) | San Francisco, CA | 2002 | 2014 | 507,686 |
| 98.9 | % | 53.16 |
| 200.1 |
| | |
409-499 Illinois Street(20) | San Francisco, CA | 2008, 2010 | 2015 | 463,985 |
| 99.0 | % | 48.69 |
| 196.8 |
| | |
| 837 Washington Street | | New York, NY | 1938, 2012-2014 | 2015 | 55,497 | 100.0% | 172.70 |
| 210.0 |
| |
409 & 499 Illinois Street(20) | | San Francisco, CA | 2008, 2010 | 2015 | 463,985 | 99.0% | 51.37 |
| 209.3 |
| |
225 Binney Street(19) | Cambridge, MA | 2013 | 2015 | 305,212 |
| 100.0 | % | 40.50 |
| 194.9 |
| | Cambridge, MA | 2013 | 2015 | 305,212 | 100.0% | 40.50 |
| 201.9 |
| |
| 1401 H Street NW | | Washington, D.C. | 1992 | 2006 | 350,787 | 74.5% | 49.13 |
| 201.1 |
| (4) |
| Millennium Corporate Park | Redmond, WA | 1999, 2000 | 2006 | 536,958 |
| 96.3 | % | 17.08 |
| 190.1 |
| | Redmond, WA | 1999, 2000 | 2006 | 536,958 | 96.3% | 19.63 |
| 184.1 |
| |
| 88 Kearny Street | San Francisco, CA | 1986 | 1999 | 227,882 |
| 86.9 | % | 51.92 |
| 172.3 |
| | San Francisco, CA | 1986 | 1999 | 227,882 | 84.1% | 58.69 |
| 174.2 |
| |
| Castro Station | Mountain View, CA | 2000, 2013 | 2015 | 114,809 |
| 93.6 | % | 77.88 |
| 158.2 |
| | Mountain View, CA | 2000, 2013 | 2015 | 114,809 | 93.7% | 90.29 |
| 169.0 |
| |
| 430 West 15th Street | | New York, NY | 1950 | 2016 | 98,087 | 100.0% | 102.61 |
| 145.8 |
| |
| Urban Centre | | Tampa, FL | 1984, 1987 | 2005 | 555,434 | 83.2% | 29.65 |
| 143.3 |
| |
Campus Pointe 1(22) | | San Diego, CA | 1980, 2012 | 2016 | 449,759 | 72.9% | 37.30 |
| 143.0 |
| |
| Wilton Woods Corporate Campus | Wilton, CT | 1974, 2001 | 2001 | 531,606 |
| 77.5 | % | 25.13 |
| 141.9 |
| | Wilton, CT | 1974, 2001 | 2001 | 531,606 | 78.6% | 24.01 |
| 133.0 |
| |
Campus Pointe 1(27) | San Diego, CA | 1980, 2012 | 2016 | 449,759 |
| 99.4 | % | 27.20 |
| 137.5 |
| | |
| Urban Centre | Tampa, FL | 1984, 1987 | 2005 | 550,666 |
| 79.6 | % | 27.72 |
| 121.4 |
| | |
| 430 West 15th Street | New York, NY | 1950 | 2016 | 98,087 |
| 100.0 | % | 84.11 |
| 116.1 |
| | |
Campus Pointe 2 & 3(22) (30) | | San Diego, CA | 1997, 2016 | 2016, 2017 | 305,006 | 100.0% | 36.83 |
| 127.1 |
| |
| Pacific Plaza | San Diego, CA | 2000, 2002 | 2007 | 217,890 |
| 49.7 | % | 31.99 |
| 115.0 |
| | San Diego, CA | 2000, 2002 | 2007 | 217,823 | 48.9% | 22.16 |
| 115.2 |
| |
Campus Pointe 2(22) | San Diego, CA | 1997, 2016 | 2016 | 305,006 |
| 100.0 | % | 36.83 |
| 85.7 |
| | |
| The Ellipse at Ballston | Arlington, VA | 1989 | 2006 | 196,676 |
| 85.3 | % | 43.49 |
| 79.8 |
| | Arlington, VA | 1989 | 2006 | 196,817 | 85.4% | 41.51 |
| 83.7 |
| |
1500 Owens(21) | San Francisco, CA | 2009 | 2015 | 158,267 |
| 100.0 | % | 48.75 |
| 74.8 |
| | San Francisco, CA | 2009 | 2015 | 158,267 | 100.0% | 50.59 |
| 77.5 |
| |
| 200 Middlefield Road | Menlo Park, CA | 1967, 2012- 2013 | 2014 | 41,933 |
| 100.0 | % | 76.22 |
| 60.5 |
| | Menlo Park, CA | 1967, 2012-2013 | 2014 | 41,933 | 100.0% | 78.51 |
| 61.4 |
| |
| West Lake North Business Park | Westlake Village, CA | 2000 | 2004 | 197,366 |
| 92.6 | % | 28.89 |
| 60.0 |
| | Westlake Village, CA | 2000 | 2004 | 197,366 | 95.1% | 29.96 |
| 60.3 |
| |
| | | Property | Location | Year Built | Year Purchased | Rentable Area (Sq. ft.)(1) | Percent Leased | Annual Avg. Base Rent Per Leased Sq. Ft.(2) | Fair Value(3) (in millions) | Location | Year Built | Year Purchased | Rentable Area (Sq. ft.)(1) | Percent Leased | Annual Avg. Base Rent Per Leased Sq. Ft.(2) | Fair Value(3) (in millions) |
| Camelback Center | Phoenix, AZ | 2001 | 2007 | 232,615 |
| 77.1 | % | $ | 24.82 |
| $ | 56.4 |
| | Phoenix, AZ | 2001 | 2007 | 232,615 | 86.1% | $ | 24.86 |
| $ | 59.8 |
| |
The Hub(25) | Long Island City, NY | 1924 | 2016 | 296,632 |
| 52.6 | % | 14.35 |
| 54.9 |
| | Long Island City, NY | 1924 | 2016 | 303,803 | 42.0% | 15.27 |
| 56.9 |
| |
| 8270 Greensboro Drive | McLean, VA | 2000 | 2005 | 158,341 |
| 92.6 | % | 33.35 |
| 47.6 |
| | McLean, VA | 2000 | 2005 | 158,341 | 86.0% | 30.92 |
| 50.3 |
| |
817 Broadway(26) | New York, NY | 1900 | 2016 | 139,410 |
| 81.0 | % | 22.44 |
| 20.8 |
| | New York, NY | 1900 | 2016 | 139,410 | 73.0% | 16.37 |
| 23.0 |
| |
Campus Pointe 4(22) | | San Diego, CA | 1991, 2015 | 2017 | 44,034 | 100.0% | 25.02 |
| 8.8 |
| |
| Subtotal—Office Properties | Subtotal—Office Properties | | | 87.1 | % | | $ | 9,084.7 |
| | Subtotal—Office Properties | | | 85.9% | | $ | 9,057.3 |
| |
| INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES | INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES | | | | INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES | | | |
| Ontario Industrial Portfolio | Various, CA | 1997-1998 | 1998, 2000, 2004 | 3,981,894 |
| 100.0 | % | $ | 4.49 |
| $ | 438.0 |
| | Various, CA | 1997-1998 | 1998, 2000, 2004 | 3,361,599 | 100.0% | $ | 5.03 |
| $ | 398.6 |
| |
| Dallas Industrial Portfolio | Dallas and Coppell, TX | 1997-2001 | 2000-2002 | 3,684,941 |
| 98.5 | % | 2.62 |
| 201.3 |
| | Dallas and Coppell, TX | 1997-2001 | 2000-2002 | 3,684,941 | 94.1% | 3.34 |
| 213.2 |
| |
| Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Portfolio | Rancho Cucamonga, CA | 2000-2002 | 2000, 2001, 2002, 2004 | 1,490,235 |
| 100.0 | % | 4.48 |
| 174.2 |
| | |
| Great West Industrial Portfolio | Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana, CA | 2004-2005 | 2008 | 1,358,925 |
| 100.0 | % | 4.16 |
| 166.1 |
| | Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana, CA | 2004-2005 | 2008 | 1,358,925 | 100.0% | 5.42 |
| 167.0 |
| |
| Cerritos Industrial Park | | Cerritos, CA | 1970-1977 | 2012 | 934,213 | 100.0% | 5.86 |
| 142.0 |
| |
| Southern CA RA Industrial Portfolio | Los Angeles, CA | 1982 | 2004 | 920,078 |
| 91.5 | % | 6.06 |
| 135.0 |
| | Los Angeles, CA | 1982 | 2004 | 920,078 | 92.1% | 7.27 |
| 138.0 |
| |
| Pinto Business Park | Houston, TX | 2014, 2015, 2016 | 2015, 2016 | 1,641,141 |
| 51.7 | % | 5.31 |
| 134.2 |
| | Houston, TX | 2014, 2015, 2016 | 2015, 2016 | 1,641,141 | 57.2% | 5.26 |
| 131.6 |
| |
| Cerritos Industrial Park | Cerritos, CA | 1970-1977 | 2012 | 934,213 |
| 100.0 | % | 6.09 |
| 126.3 |
| | |
| Rainier Corporate Park | Fife, WA | 1991-1997 | 2003 | 1,104,399 |
| 94.8 | % | 5.00 |
| 104.0 |
| | Fife, WA | 1991-1997 | 2003 | 1,104,399 | 95.9% | 5.48 |
| 123.7 |
| |
| Amazon Distribution Center | | Teterboro, NJ | 1958, 1974 | 2013 | 616,992 | 100.0% | 9.00 |
| 110.0 |
| |
| Seneca Industrial Park | Pembroke Park, FL | 1999-2001 | 2007 | 882,182 |
| 97.3 | % | 6.17 |
| 102.7 |
| | Pembroke Park, FL | 1999-2001 | 2007 | 882,182 | 95.2% | 6.34 |
| 108.8 |
| |
Amazon Distribution Center(28) | Teterboro, NJ | 1958, 1974 | 2013 | 616,992 |
| 100.0 | % | 8.83 |
| 101.0 |
| | |
| Chicago Industrial Portfolio | | Chicago and Joliet, IL | 1997-2000 | 1998, 2000 | 1,427,748 | 100.0% | 4.40 |
| 100.3 |
| |
| Regal Logistics Campus | | Seattle, WA | 1999-2004 | 2005 | 968,535 | 100.0% | 4.06 |
| 100.0 |
| |
| Weston Business Center | Weston, FL | 1998-1999 | 2011 | 679,918 |
| 67.0 | % | 8.30 |
| 92.7 |
| | Weston, FL | 1998-1999 | 2011 | 679,918 | 67.0% | 7.75 |
| 92.8 |
| |
| Shawnee Ridge Industrial Portfolio | Atlanta, GA | 2000-2005 | 2005 | 1,422,922 |
| 100.0 | % | 3.61 |
| 86.7 |
| | Atlanta, GA | 2000-2005 | 2005 | 1,422,922 | 100.0% | 3.66 |
| 91.1 |
| |
| Chicago Industrial Portfolio | Chicago and Joliet, IL | 1997-2000 | 1998, 2000 | 1,427,748 |
| 96.9 | % | 3.02 |
| 85.5 |
| | |
| Regal Logistics Campus | Seattle, WA | 1999-2004 | 2005 | 968,535 |
| 100.0 | % | 4.28 |
| 83.1 |
| | |
| South River Road Industrial | | Cranbury, NJ | 1999 | 2001 | 858,957 | 100.0% | 3.94 |
| 87.8 |
| |
| Oakmont IE West Portfolio | Fontana, CA | 2014-2015 | 2015 | 709,941 |
| 56.1 | % | 4.98 |
| 82.7 |
| | Fontana, CA | 2014-2015 | 2015 | 709,941 | 100.0% | 5.16 |
| 87.6 |
| |
| Northern CA RA Industrial Portfolio | | Oakland, CA | 1981 | 2004 | 657,602 | 94.8% | 7.11 |
| 87.4 |
| |
| Chicago Caleast Industrial Portfolio | Chicago, IL | 1974, 2005 | 2003 | 1,145,152 |
| 100.0 | % | 4.18 |
| 81.8 |
| | Chicago, IL | 1974, 2005 | 2003 | 1,145,152 | 100.0% | 4.34 |
| 80.5 |
| |
| Northern CA RA Industrial Portfolio | Oakland, CA | 1981 | 2004 | 657,602 |
| 94.3 | % | 6.32 |
| 76.7 |
| | |
| South River Road Industrial | Cranbury, NJ | 1999 | 2001 | 858,957 |
| 100.0 | % | 4.66 |
| 71.9 |
| | |
| Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Portfolio | | Rancho Cucamonga, CA | 2000-2002 | 2000, 2001, 2002, 2004 | 573,000 | 100.0% | 11.41 |
| 71.9 |
| |
| Northwest Houston Industrial Portfolio | Houston, TX | 1981 | 2014 | 1,010,912 |
| 100.0 | % | 4.09 |
| 68.2 |
| | Houston, TX | 1981 | 2014 | 1,010,912 | 100.0% | 4.45 |
| 70.7 |
| |
| Atlanta Industrial Portfolio | Lawrenceville, GA | 1996-1999 | 2000 | 1,295,440 |
| 95.9 | % | 2.98 |
| 62.8 |
| | |
| Ontario Mills Industrial Portfolio | | Ontario, CA | 2014 | 435,733 | 100.0% | 5.23 |
| 58.5 |
| |
Commerce LIC(27) | | Long Island City, NY | 1949 | 2017 | 255,564 | 81.4% | 13.38 |
| 58.2 |
| |
| Frontera Industrial Business Park | | San Diego, CA | 1989, 2015 | 2017 | 517,207 | 69.1% | 8.81 |
| 56.4 |
| |
| Broward Industrial Portfolio | | Various, FL | Various | 2017 | 401,368 | 83.2% | 8.57 |
| 54.2 |
| |
| Pinnacle Industrial Portfolio | Grapevine, TX | 2003, 2004, 2006 | 2006 | 899,200 |
| 88.6 | % | 3.62 |
| 52.8 |
| | Grapevine, TX | 2003, 2004, 2006 | 2006 | 899,200 | 100.0% | 2.70 |
| 53.3 |
| |
| Ontario Mills Industrial Portfolio | Ontario, CA | 2014 | 435,733 |
| 100.0 | % | 5.08 |
| 52.0 |
| | |
| 200 Milik Street | Carteret, NJ | 2013 | 2015 | 232,134 |
| 100.0 | % | 10.75 |
| 51.2 |
| | Carteret, NJ | 2013 | 2015 | 232,134 | 100.0% | 10.96 |
| 53.1 |
| |
| Stevenson Point | Newark, CA | 2000 | 2015 | 312,885 |
| 100.0 | % | 9.08 |
| 49.3 |
| | Newark, CA | 2000 | 2015 | 312,885 | 95.6% | 11.46 |
| 50.9 |
| |
| Centre Pointe and Valley View | Los Angeles County, CA | 1965, 1989 | 2004 | 307,685 |
| 93.8 | % | 6.14 |
| 42.8 |
| | Los Angeles County, CA | 1965, 1989 | 2004 | 307,685 | 83.4% | 7.57 |
| 47.8 |
| |
| Pacific Corporate Park | Fife, WA | 2006 | 2012 | 388,783 |
| 100.0 | % | 4.64 |
| 42.0 |
| | Fife, WA | 2006 | 2012 | 388,783 | 100.0% | 5.17 |
| 45.5 |
| |
| Northeast RA Industrial Portfolio | Boston, MA | 2000 | 2004 | 384,126 |
| 100.0 | % | 6.25 |
| 41.3 |
| | |
| Landover Logistics | Landover, MD | 2013 | 2014 | 360,550 |
| 46.4 | % | 7.84 |
| 39.8 |
| | Landover, MD | 2013 | 2014 | 360,550 | 46.4% | 8.21 |
| 43.4 |
| |
| Northwest RA Industrial Portfolio | Seattle, WA | 1996 | 2004 | 312,321 |
| 100.0 | % | 5.46 |
| 31.7 |
| | |
| | | Property | Location | Year Built | Year Purchased | Rentable Area (Sq. ft.)(1) | Percent Leased | Annual Avg. Base Rent Per Leased Sq. Ft.(2) | Fair Value(3) (in millions) | Location | Year Built | Year Purchased | Rentable Area (Sq. ft.)(1) | Percent Leased | Annual Avg. Base Rent Per Leased Sq. Ft.(2) | Fair Value(3) (in millions) |
| Northeast RA Industrial Portfolio | | Boston, MA | 2000 | 2004 | 384,126 | 100.0% | $ | 6.30 |
| $ | 40.9 |
| |
| Northwest RA Industrial Portfolio | | Seattle, WA | 1996 | 2004 | 312,321 | 99.2% | 3.46 |
| 38.5 |
| |
| One Beeman Road | | Northborough, MA | 1985 | 2017 | 342,900 | 100.0% | 7.01 |
| 33.8 |
| |
| Atlanta Industrial Portfolio | | Lawrenceville, GA | 1996-1999 | 2000 | 495,440 | 100.0% | 7.86 |
| 32.4 |
| |
| Beltway North Commerce Center | Houston, TX | 2014 | 2015 | 352,000 |
| — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 19.5 |
| | Houston, TX | 2014 | 2015 | 352,000 | — | — |
| 19.3 |
| |
| Park 10 Distribution | Houston, TX | 1980 | 2014 | 152,638 |
| 82.3 | % | 4.99 |
| 11.3 |
| | Houston, TX | 1980 | 2014 | 152,638 | 50.1% | 4.71 |
| 10.3 |
| |
| Subtotal—Industrial Properties | Subtotal—Industrial Properties | | | 92.3 | % | | $ | 2,908.6 |
| | Subtotal—Industrial Properties | | | 92.4% | | $ | 3,099.5 |
| |
| RETAIL PROPERTIES | RETAIL PROPERTIES | | | | RETAIL PROPERTIES | | | |
Fashion Show(24) | Las Vegas, NV | 1981 | 2016 | 1,911,837 |
| 97.5 | % | $ | 35.70 |
| $ | 839.1 |
| | Las Vegas, NV | 1981 | 2016 | 1,899,875 | 98.3% | $ | 36.00 |
| $ | 844.4 |
| |
The Florida Mall(8) | Orlando, FL | 1986 | 2002 | 1,034,449 |
| 100.0 | % | 55.10 |
| 755.8 |
| | Orlando, FL | 1986 | 2002 | 1,071,832 | 100.0% | 55.12 |
| 758.4 |
| |
DDR Joint Venture(7) | Various, USA | Various | 2007 | 8,551,095 |
| 95.4 | % | 12.18 |
| 552.8 |
| | Various, U.S.A. | Various | 2007 | 8,351,983 | 91.6% | 15.61 |
| 636.2 |
| |
| The Forum at Carlsbad | Carlsbad, CA | 2003 | 2011 | 263,708 |
| 98.5 | % | 38.89 |
| 221.5 |
| (4) | Carlsbad, CA | 2003 | 2011 | 265,707 | 96.5% | 39.95 |
| 221.0 |
| (4) |
Miami International Mall(8) | Miami, FL | 1982 | 2002 | 305,170 |
| 100.0 | % | 50.25 |
| 161.1 |
| | Miami, FL | 1982 | 2002 | 304,269 | 100.0% | 54.04 |
| 166.0 |
| |
Florida Retail Portfolio(9) | | Various, FL | 1974, 2005 | 2006 | 436,277 | 99.6% | 25.29 |
| 150.6 |
| |
West Town Mall(8) | Knoxville, TN | 1972 | 2002 | 961,143 |
| 96.6 | % | 18.79 |
| 154.4 |
| | Knoxville, TN | 1972 | 2002 | 961,143 | 100.0% | 17.60 |
| 140.4 |
| |
Florida Retail Portfolio(9) | Various, FL | 1974, 2005 | 2006 | 459,433 |
| 96.9 | % | 20.73 |
| 147.6 |
| | |
Valencia Town Center(16) | | Valencia, CA | 1991 | 2012 | 1,076,311 | 97.1% | 17.85 |
| 138.8 |
| |
Pacific City(23) | Huntington Beach, CA | 2015 | 2016 | 189,943 |
| 87.6 | % | 38.80 |
| 128.5 |
| | Huntington Beach, CA | 2015 | 2016 | 189,945 | 92.9% | 36.95 |
| 134.9 |
| |
Valencia Town Center(16) | Valencia, CA | 1991 | 2012 | 1,085,985 |
| 95.4 | % | 17.98 |
| 128.0 |
| | |
| Westwood Marketplace | Los Angeles, CA | 1950 | 2002 | 202,202 |
| 100.0 | % | 30.47 |
| 125.0 |
| | Los Angeles, CA | 1950 | 2002 | 202,202 | 100.0% | 30.56 |
| 131.9 |
| |
| The Shops at Wisconsin Place | Chevy Chase, MD | 2007-2010 | 2012 | 117,202 |
| 97.5 | % | 51.23 |
| 112.2 |
| (14) | |
| Bridgepointe Shopping Center | | San Mateo, CA | 1998 | 2017 | 229,769 | 81.5% | 28.41 |
| 124.5 |
| |
| Plaza America | Reston, VA | 1995 | 2014 | 164,398 |
| 91.7 | % | 32.01 |
| 109.0 |
| | Reston, VA | 1995 | 2014 | 164,398 | 92.7% | 34.32 |
| 117.0 |
| |
The Shops at Wisconsin Place(14) | | Chevy Chase, MD | 2007-2010 | 2012 | 117,202 | 97.5% | 49.91 |
| 110.0 |
| |
| Marketfair | West Windsor, NJ | 1987 | 2006 | 242,731 |
| 96.0 | % | 29.97 |
| 104.2 |
| | West Windsor, NJ | 1987 | 2006 | 242,866 | 97.8% | 27.85 |
| 102.9 |
| |
| Charleston Plaza | Mountain View, CA | 2006 | 2012 | 132,590 |
| 100.0 | % | 36.72 |
| 92.0 |
| | Mountain View, CA | 2006 | 2012 | 132,590 | 100.0% | 36.71 |
| 93.0 |
| |
| Mazza Gallerie | Washington, D.C. | 1975 | 2004 | 294,112 |
| 85.8 | % | 14.18 |
| 78.0 |
| | |
| Publix at Weston Commons | | Weston, FL | 2005 | 2006 | 126,922 | 98.9% | 28.42 |
| 74.8 |
| |
| South Denver Marketplace | Denver, CO | 1996-1998 | 2013 | 261,135 |
| 100.0 | % | 16.15 |
| 73.0 |
| | Denver, CO | 1996-1998 | 2013 | 261,135 | 100.0% | 16.16 |
| 72.7 |
| |
| Publix at Weston Commons | Weston, FL | 2005 | 2006 | 126,922 |
| 100.0 | % | 28.42 |
| 73.0 |
| | |
| 32 South State Street | | Chicago, IL | 1925 | 2016 | 96,354 | 100.0% | 27.58 |
| 48.3 |
| (4) |
| Southside at McEwen | Franklin, TN | 2012 | 2014 | 92,470 |
| 100.0 | % | 27.00 |
| 48.8 |
| | Franklin, TN | 2012 | 2014 | 92,470 | 100.0% | 25.34 |
| 48.2 |
| |
| 32 South State Street | Chicago, IL | 1925 | 2016 | 96,354 |
| 100.0 | % | 26.84 |
| 46.5 |
| (4) | |
401 West 14th Street(18) | New York, NY | 1923, 2007 | 2014 | 62,200 |
| 100.0 | % | 152.29 |
| 41.1 |
| | New York, NY | 1923, 2007 | 2014 | 62,200 | 100.0% | 136.94 |
| 46.4 |
| |
| 1619 Walnut Street | Philadelphia, PA | 1937, 2013 | 2013 | 34,047 |
| 100.0 | % | 39.33 |
| 23.4 |
| | Philadelphia, PA | 1937, 2013 | 2013 | 34,047 | 100.0% | 41.33 |
| 24.1 |
| |
| Subtotal—Retail Properties | Subtotal—Retail Properties | | | 96.5 | % | | $ | 4,015.0 |
| | Subtotal—Retail Properties | | | 95.3% | | $ | 4,184.5 |
| |
| OTHER COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES | OTHER COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES | | | | OTHER COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES | | | |
425 Park Avenue(10) | New York, NY | N/A | 2011 | N/A |
| N/A |
| N/A |
| $ | 450.0 |
| | New York, NY | N/A | 2011 | N/A | N/A | $ | 457.0 |
| |
Storage Portfolio(11) | Various, USA | 1972, 1990 | 2003 | 1,674,220 |
| 91.9 | % | 18.87 |
| 156.5 |
| | |
Storage Portfolio I(11) | | Various, U.S.A. | 1972, 1990 | 2003 | 1,681,229 | 93.2% | 18.70 |
| 177.5 |
| |
Storage Portfolio II(29) | | Various, U.S.A. | Various | 2017 | 2,300,756 | 95.8% | 11.78 |
| 91.8 |
| |
9625 Towne Centre Drive(28) | | San Diego, CA | N/A | 2017 | N/A | N/A | 15.1 |
| |
| Subtotal—Other Commercial Properties | Subtotal—Other Commercial Properties | | | | | $ | 606.5 |
| | Subtotal—Other Commercial Properties | | | 94.7% | |
| $ | 741.4 |
| |
| Subtotal—Commercial Properties | Subtotal—Commercial Properties | | | 92.0 | % | | $ | 16,614.8 |
| | Subtotal—Commercial Properties | | | 91.6% | |
| $ | 17,082.7 |
| |
| RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES | RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES | | | | | RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES | | |
| | |
| Palomino Park | Highlands Ranch, CO | 1996-2001 | 2005 | N/A |
| 95.5 | % | N/A |
| $ | 314.1 |
| (4) | Highlands Ranch, CO | 1996-2001 | 2005 | N/A | 94.2% | N/A | $ | 329.7 |
| (4) |
| The Colorado | New York, NY | 1987 | 1999 | N/A |
| 86.7 | % | N/A |
| 258.1 |
| (4) | New York, NY | 1987 | 1999 | N/A | 96.0% | N/A | 256.2 |
| (4) |
| The Corner | New York, NY | 2010 | 2011 | N/A |
| 93.4 | % | N/A |
| 250.0 |
| (4) | New York, NY | 2010 | 2011 | N/A | 91.8% | N/A | 251.0 |
| (4) |
| The Woodley | Washington, D.C. | 2014 | N/A |
| 91.5 | % | N/A |
| 203.0 |
| | Washington, D.C. | 2014 | N/A | 94.3% | N/A | 191.0 |
| |
MiMA(15) | New York, NY | 2010 | 2012 | N/A |
| 100.0 | % | N/A |
| 194.7 |
| | New York, NY | 2010 | 2012 | N/A | 97.0% | N/A | 189.2 |
| |
| The Louis at 14th | Washington, D.C. | 2013-2014 | 2014 | N/A |
| 91.8 | % | N/A |
| 183.2 |
| | |
| Stella | Marina Del Rey, CA | 2013 | N/A |
| 93.0 | % | N/A |
| 173.1 |
| | |
| Mass Court | Washington, D.C. | 2004 | 2012 | N/A |
| 93.2 | % | N/A |
| 169.0 |
| (4) | |
| 250 North 10th Street | Brooklyn, NY | 2014 | 2015 | N/A |
| 89.3 | % | N/A |
| 162.0 |
| | |
| Houston Apartment Portfolio | Houston, TX | 1984-2004 | 2006 | N/A |
| 99.2 | % | N/A |
| 159.3 |
| | |
| BLVD63 | San Diego, CA | 2014 | 2016 | N/A |
| 100.0 | % | N/A |
| 157.0 |
| | |
| The Manor at Flagler Village | Fort Lauderdale, FL | 2014 | 2015 | N/A |
| 90.1 | % | N/A |
| 150.8 |
| | |
| Holly Street Village | Pasadena, CA | 1997 | 2013 | N/A |
| 87.4 | % | N/A |
| 146.0 |
| | |
| | | Property | Location | Year Built | Year Purchased | Rentable Area (Sq. ft.)(1) | Percent Leased | Annual Avg. Base Rent Per Leased Sq. Ft.(2) | Fair Value(3) (in millions) | Location | Year Built | Year Purchased | Rentable Area (Sq. ft.)(1) | Percent Leased | Annual Avg. Base Rent Per Leased Sq. Ft.(2) | Fair Value(3) (in millions) |
| Stella | | Marina Del Rey, CA | 2013 | N/A | 93.4% | N/A | $ | 179.7 |
| |
| The Louis at 14th | | Washington, D.C. | 2013-2014 | 2014 | N/A | 93.3% | N/A | 176.0 |
| |
| Mass Court | | Washington, D.C. | 2004 | 2012 | N/A | 85.7% | N/A | 171.0 |
| (4) |
| 250 North 10th Street | | Brooklyn, NY | 2014 | 2015 | N/A | 95.3% | N/A | 163.1 |
| |
| BLVD63 | | San Diego, CA | 2014 | 2016 | N/A | 92.2% | N/A | 162.1 |
| |
| Houston Apartment Portfolio | | Houston, TX | 1984-2004 | 2006 | N/A | 90.3% | N/A | 158.7 |
| |
| The Manor at Flagler Village | | Fort Lauderdale, FL | 2014 | 2015 | N/A | 90.8% | N/A | 148.1 |
| |
| Holly Street Village | | Pasadena, CA | 1997 | 2013 | N/A | 94.4% | N/A | 148.0 |
| |
| Larkspur Courts | | Larkspur, CA | 1991 | 1999 | N/A | 87.9% | N/A | 143.7 |
| |
| The Legacy at Westwood | Los Angeles, CA | 2001 | 2002 | N/A |
| 91.8 | % | N/A |
| $ | 142.1 |
| (4) | Los Angeles, CA | 2001 | 2002 | N/A | 94.7% | N/A | 143.0 |
| (4) |
| Larkspur Courts | Larkspur, CA | 1991 | 1999 | N/A |
| 93.9 | % | N/A |
| 140.5 |
| | |
| The Palatine | Arlington, VA | 2008 | 2011 | N/A |
| 95.8 | % | N/A |
| 130.9 |
| (4) | Arlington, VA | 2008 | 2011 | N/A | 94.3% | N/A | 123.2 |
| (4) |
| Kierland Apartment Portfolio | Scottsdale, AZ | 1996-2000 | 2006 | N/A |
| 100.0 | % | N/A |
| 127.9 |
| (4) | |
| Union - South Lake Union | | Seattle, WA | 2012 | 2015 | N/A | 93.7% | N/A | 111.0 |
| |
| Ashford Meadows Apartments | Herndon, VA | 1998 | 2000 | N/A |
| 91.8 | % | N/A |
| 107.2 |
| (4) | Herndon, VA | 1998 | 2000 | N/A | 91.1% | N/A | 107.3 |
| (4) |
| Union - South Lake Union | Seattle, WA | 2012 | 2015 | N/A |
| 94.4 | % | N/A |
| 105.3 |
| | |
| South Florida Apartment Portfolio | Boca Raton and Plantation, FL | 1986 | 2001 | N/A |
| 92.4 | % | N/A |
| 104.1 |
| | Boca Raton and Plantation, FL | 1986 | 2001 | N/A | 93.1% | N/A | 105.1 |
| |
| Regents Court | | San Diego, CA | 2001 | 2002 | N/A | 93.2% | N/A | 99.1 |
| (4) |
| Circa Green Lake | | Seattle, WA | 2009 | 2012 | N/A | 93.0% | N/A | 97.5 |
| |
| Casa Palma | Coconut Creek, FL | 2014 | 2015 | N/A |
| 89.7 | % | N/A |
| 97.0 |
| | Coconut Creek, FL | 2014 | 2015 | N/A | 90.3% | N/A | 95.0 |
| |
| Circa Green Lake | Seattle, WA | 2009 | 2012 | N/A |
| 93.0 | % | N/A |
| 92.5 |
| | |
| Regents Court | San Diego, CA | 2001 | 2002 | N/A |
| 91.6 | % | N/A |
| 89.9 |
| (4) | |
| 803 Corday | | Naperville, IL | 1999 | 2017 | N/A | 84.1% | N/A | 94.5 |
| |
| Township Apartments | Redwood City, CA | 2014 | N/A |
| 92.4 | % | N/A |
| 89.6 |
| | Redwood City, CA | 2014 | N/A | 96.2% | N/A | 89.8 |
| |
| Oceano at Warner Center | Woodland Hills, CA | 2012 | 2013 | N/A |
| 93.0 | % | N/A |
| 88.3 |
| | Woodland Hills, CA | 2012 | 2013 | N/A | 95.1% | N/A | 89.0 |
| |
| The Caruth | Dallas, TX | 1999 | 2005 | N/A |
| 93.2 | % | N/A |
| 84.3 |
| (4) | |
| The Residences at the Village of Merrick Park | Coral Gables, FL | 2003 | 2012 | N/A |
| 92.5 | % | N/A |
| 74.1 |
| | Coral Gables, FL | 2003 | 2012 | N/A | 79.2% | N/A | 76.0 |
| |
| Greene Crossing | Columbia, SC | 2015 | 2016 | N/A |
| 95.2 | % | N/A |
| 65.8 |
| | Columbia, SC | 2015 | 2016 | N/A | 99.7% | N/A | 67.2 |
| |
| The Bridges | | Minneapolis, MN | 2014 | 2017 | N/A | 100.0% | N/A | 62.4 |
| |
| Prescott Wallingford Apartments | Seattle, WA | 2012 | N/A |
| 93.5 | % | N/A |
| 58.8 |
| | Seattle, WA | 2012 | N/A | 94.8% | N/A | 62.0 |
| |
| Allure at Camarillo | | Camarillo, CA | 2003 | 2017 | N/A | 87.3% | N/A | 59.6 |
| |
| The Maroneal | | Houston, TX | 1998 | 2005 | N/A | 91.3% | N/A | 56.6 |
| |
| The Manor Apartments | Plantation, FL | 2013 | 2014 | N/A |
| 93.3 | % | N/A |
| 53.6 |
| | Plantation, FL | 2013 | 2014 | N/A | 97.0% | N/A | 52.6 |
| |
| The Pepper Building | Philadelphia, PA | 1927, 2010 | 2011 | N/A |
| 93.5 | % | N/A |
| 52.9 |
| | |
| The Maroneal | Houston, TX | 1998 | 2005 | N/A |
| 87.7 | % | N/A |
| 52.1 |
| | |
| Westcreek | | Westlake Village, CA | 1988 | 1997 | N/A | 93.7% | N/A | 51.4 |
| |
| The Cordelia | Portland, OR | 2014 | 2015 | N/A |
| 91.9 | % | N/A |
| 50.0 |
| | Portland, OR | 2014 | 2015 | N/A | 87.4% | N/A | 49.0 |
| |
| Westcreek | Westlake Village, CA | 1988 | 1997 | N/A |
| 90.5 | % | N/A |
| 48.2 |
| | |
| Cliffs at Barton Creek | Austin, TX | 1994 | 2013 | N/A |
| 86.6 | % | N/A |
| 45.8 |
| | Austin, TX | 1994 | 2013 | N/A | 89.0% | N/A | 45.9 |
| |
| Orion on Orpington | | Orlando, FL | 2007 | 2017 | N/A | 99.5% | N/A | 44.4 |
| |
| The Ashton | Washington, D.C. | 2009 | 2015 | N/A |
| 95.9 | % | N/A |
| 39.2 |
| | Washington, D.C. | 2009 | 2015 | N/A | 69.4% | N/A | 37.5 |
| |
| The Knoll | | Minneapolis, MN | 2013 | 2017 | N/A | 99.8% | N/A | 34.0 |
| (4) |
| Subtotal—Residential Properties | Subtotal—Residential Properties | | 92.5 | % | | $ | 4,460.4 |
| | Subtotal—Residential Properties | | 93.5% | | $ | 4,520.6 |
| |
| Total—All Properties | Total—All Properties | 92.1 | % | | $ | 21,075.2 |
| | Total—All Properties | 92.0% | | $ | 21,603.3 |
| |
| |
(1) | The square footage is an approximate measure and is subject to periodic remeasurement. |
| |
(2) | Based on total contractual rent for leases existing as of December 31, 2016.2017. The contractual rent can be either on a gross or net basis, depending on the terms of the leases. |
| |
(3) | Fair value reflects the value determined in accordance with the procedures described in the Account’s prospectus and as stated in the valuation section of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
| |
(4) | Property is subject to a mortgage. The fair value shown represents the Account’sAccount's interest gross of debt. |
| |
(5) | This property is held in a joint venture primarily with EOP Operating LP.Boston Properties. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Account’s 50% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
| |
(6) | The Account owns a 50.25% interest in a private REIT, which owns this property. A 49.70% interest is owned by Societe Immobiler Trans-Quebec, and 0.05% is owned by 100 individuals. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Account’s interest in the joint venture. |
| |
(7) | This investment is held in a joint venture with DDR Corp. and consists of 2523 properties located in 1110 states. Fair Value shown reflects the value of the Account’sAccount's 85% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
| |
(8) | These investments areThis investment is held in a joint venture with the Simon Property Group. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Account’s 50% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
| |
(9) | This investment is held in a joint venture with Weingarten Realty Investors and contains two neighborhood and/or community shopping centers located in the Orlando and Tampa, Florida areas. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Account’s 80% interest in the joint venture. |
| |
(10) | Represents a fee interest encumbered by a ground lease real estate investment. |
| |
(11) | This investment is held in a joint venture with Storage USA.U.S.A. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Account’s 75% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
| |
(12) | This property is held in a joint venture with SCD 400 Fairview, LLC. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Account’s 90% interest in the joint venture, net of debt.venture. |
| |
(13) | This property is held in a joint venture with Allianz US Private REIT LP. Fair value shown reflects the Account’sAccount's 51% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
| |
(14) | Fair value shown reflects both thea retail property andwholly-owned by the Account’sAccount, as well as the Account's 33.3% interest in a joint venture investment. |
| |
(15) | This property is held in a joint venture with The Related 42, LLC.Companies. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Account’s 70% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
| |
(16) | This property is held in a joint venture with Westfield Holdings, LP.LLC. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Account’s 50% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
| |
(17) | This property is held in a joint venture with Norges Bank Investment Management. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Account’s 50.1% interest in the joint venture, net of debt.venture. |
| |
(18) | This property is held in a joint venture with Taconic Investment Partners LLC. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Account’s 42.2% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
| |
(19) | This property is held in a joint venture with ARE - MA Region No. 54 LLC. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Account’s 70% interest in the joint venture, net of debt.venture. |
| |
(20) | This property is held in a joint venture with Alexandria Real Estate Equities. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Account’s 40% interest in the joint venture, net of debt.venture. |
| |
(21) | This property is held in a joint venture with Alexandria Real Estate Equities. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Account’s 49.9% interest in the joint venture, net of debt.venture. |
| |
(22) | This property is held in a joint venture with Alexandria Real Estate Equities. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Account's 40.47%Account’s 45% interest in the joint venture, net of debt.venture. |
| |
(23) | This property is held in a joint venture with DJM Capital Partners. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Account'sAccount’s 70% interest in the joint venture, net of debt.venture. |
| |
(24) | This property is held in a joint venture with General Growth Properties. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Account'sAccount’s 50% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
| |
(25) | This property is held in a joint venture with Metro Realty Holdings. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Account'sAccount’s 95% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
| |
(26) | This property is held in a joint venture with Taconic Investment Partners, LLC. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Account'sAccount’s 61.46% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
| |
(27) | This property is held in a joint venture with MRA 48-49 LIC, LLC. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Account’s 97.5% interest in the joint venture. |
| |
(28) | This property is held in a joint venture with Alexandria Real Estate Equities. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Account's 45%Account’s 35.86% interest in the joint venture. |
| |
(29) | This investment is held in a joint venture with Extra Space Storage, Inc. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Account’s 90% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
| |
(28)(30)
| InvestmentA portion of this investment consists of land for development that was formerly named Mohawk Distribution Center.acquired on December 19, 2017. |
Commercial (Non-Residential) Investments
At December 31, 2016,2017, the Account held 93100 commercial (non-residential) investments in its portfolio, including a portfoliotwo portfolios of storage facilities located throughout the United States. Twenty-three ofOf these investments, 27 were held through joint ventures and 2223 were subject to mortgages (including 1213 joint venture investments). Although the terms vary under each lease, certain expenses, such as real estate taxes and other operating expenses are paid or reimbursed in whole or in part by the tenants.
Management believes that the Account’s portfolio is diversified by both property type and geographic location. The portfolio consists of:
Office. 3839 investments containing approximately 18.3 million square feet located in nine states and the District of Columbia.
Industrial. 3135 investments containing approximately 30.930.1 million square feet located in nineten states.
Retail. 22 investments containing approximately 18.418.1 million square feet located in 16 states and the District of Columbia.states. One of the retail investments is an 85% interest in a portfolio containing 2523 individual retail shopping centers primarily located throughout the Eastern and Southern regions.
Other-Land (425 Park Avenue). The Account has a fee interest encumbered by a ground lease real estate investment located in New York, NY.
Other-Land (9625 Towne Centre Drive). The Account has a joint venture investment in land held for future development.
Other-Storage. The Account has a 75% interest in a portfoliotwo joint venture investments of storage facilities located throughout the United States containing approximately 1.74.0 million square feet.
Major Tenants: The following tables list the Account’s ten most significant tenants based on the total space they occupied as of December 31, 20162017 in each of the Account’s commercial property types.
| | | Major Office Tenants | | Occupied Sq. Ft. | | % of Total Rentable Area of Account’s Office Properties | | % of Total Rentable Area of Non-Residential Properties | | Occupied Sq. Ft. | | % of Total Rentable Area of Account’s Office Properties | | % of Total Rentable Area of Non-Residential Properties |
BHP Petroleum (Americas), Inc.(1) | | 1,313,885 |
| | 7.2 | % | | 1.9 | % | | 1,143,464 |
| | 6.2 | % | | 1.7 | % |
Microsoft Corporation(2) | | 479,193 |
| | 2.6 | % | | 0.7 | % | | 479,193 |
| | 2.6 | % | | 0.7 | % |
Eli Lilly and Company(1) | | 429,553 |
| | 2.4 | % | | 0.6 | % | |
Crowell & Moring LLP(2) | | 399,471 |
| | 2.2 | % | | 0.6 | % | | 399,471 |
| | 2.2 | % | | 0.6 | % |
Atmos Energy Corporation(2) | | 312,238 |
| | 1.7 | % | | 0.5 | % | | 312,238 |
| | 1.7 | % | | 0.5 | % |
Biogen MA Inc(1) | | 305,212 |
| | 1.7 | % | | 0.5 | % | | 305,212 |
| | 1.7 | % | | 0.5 | % |
Eli Lilly and Company(1) | | | 305,006 |
| | 1.7 | % | | 0.5 | % |
Bank of New York Mellon(1) | | 281,071 |
| | 1.5 | % | | 0.4 | % | | 281,071 |
| | 1.5 | % | | 0.4 | % |
Fibrogen Inc(1) | | 238,707 |
| | 1.3 | % | | 0.4 | % | | 238,707 |
| | 1.3 | % | | 0.4 | % |
Bridgewater Associates LP(2) | | 227,883 |
| | 1.2 | % | | 0.3 | % | | 227,883 |
| | 1.2 | % | | 0.3 | % |
Pearson Education Inc(2) | | 225,299 |
| | 1.2 | % | | 0.3 | % | | 225,299 |
| | 1.2 | % | | 0.3 | % |
| | | Major Industrial Tenants | | Occupied Sq. Ft. | | % of Total Rentable Area of Account’s Office Properties | | % of Total Rentable Area of Non-Residential Properties | | Occupied Sq. Ft. | | % of Total Rentable Area of Account’s Industrial Properties | | % of Total Rentable Area of Non-Residential Properties |
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.(2) | | 1,099,112 |
| | 3.6 | % | | 1.6 | % | | 1,099,112 |
| | 3.7 | % | | 1.7 | % |
Regal West Corporation(2) | | 968,535 |
| | 3.1 | % | | 1.4 | % | | 968,535 |
| | 3.2 | % | | 1.5 | % |
Restoration Hardware, Inc.(2) | | 886,052 |
| | 2.9 | % | | 1.3 | % | | 886,052 |
| | 2.9 | % | | 1.3 | % |
Kumho Tire U.S.A. Inc.(2) | | 830,485 |
| | 2.7 | % | | 1.2 | % | | 830,485 |
| | 2.8 | % | | 1.2 | % |
Exel, Inc.(2) | | 800,000 |
| | 2.6 | % | | 1.2 | % | |
Del Monte Fresh Product, N.A., Inc.(2) | | 689,660 |
| | 2.2 | % | | 1.0 | % | | 689,660 |
| | 2.3 | % | | 1.0 | % |
Amazon.com(2) | | 684,988 |
| | 2.2 | % | | 1.0 | % | | 684,988 |
| | 2.3 | % | | 1.0 | % |
R.R Donnelley & Sons Company(2) | | 659,157 |
| | 2.1 | % | | 1.0 | % | | 659,157 |
| | 2.2 | % | | 1.0 | % |
Rheem Sales Company, Inc.(2) | | 656,600 |
| | 2.1 | % | | 1.0 | % | | 656,600 |
| | 2.2 | % | | 1.0 | % |
Global Equipment Company, Inc.(2) | | 647,228 |
| | 2.1 | % | | 1.0 | % | | 647,228 |
| | 2.1 | % | | 1.0 | % |
Campbell Soup Supply Company(2) | | | 573,000 |
| | 1.9 | % | | 0.9 | % |
| | | Major Retail Tenants | | Occupied Sq. Ft. | | % of Total Rentable Area of Account’s Office Properties | | % of Total Rentable Area of Non-Residential Properties | | Occupied Sq. Ft. | | % of Total Rentable Area of Account’s Retail Properties | | % of Total Rentable Area of Non-Residential Properties |
Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.(1) | | 415,902 |
| | 2.3 | % | | 0.6 | % | | 599,887 |
| | 3.3 | % | | 0.9 | % |
Macy's Inc.(1) | | | 496,603 |
| | 2.7 | % | | 0.7 | % |
Belk, Inc.(1) | | | 371,706 |
| | 2.1 | % | | 0.6 | % |
Kohl's Corporation(1) | | 349,777 |
| | 1.9 | % | | 0.5 | % | | 349,777 |
| | 1.9 | % | | 0.5 | % |
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc(1) | | | 327,027 |
| | 1.8 | % | | 0.5 | % |
Ross Stores, Inc.(1) | | 346,072 |
| | 1.9 | % | | 0.5 | % | | 320,189 |
| | 1.8 | % | | 0.5 | % |
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc(1) | | 327,027 |
| | 1.8 | % | | 0.5 | % | |
Sears, Roebuck & Co. (1) | | 304,465 |
| | 1.7 | % | | 0.5 | % | |
The Neiman Marcus Group Inc.(3) | | 291,314 |
| | 1.6 | % | | 0.4 | % | |
PetSmart, Inc.(3) | | | 308,294 |
| | 1.7 | % | | 0.5 | % |
Nordstrom Inc.(3) | | 278,688 |
| | 1.5 | % | | 0.4 | % | | 304,610 |
| | 1.7 | % | | 0.5 | % |
PetSmart, Inc.(3) | | 264,119 |
| | 1.4 | % | | 0.4 | % | |
Michael's Stores, Inc.(3) | | 236,646 |
| | 1.3 | % | | 0.4 | % | |
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.(2) | | 209,751 |
| | 1.1 | % | | 0.3 | % | |
Bed Bath and Beyond Inc.(3) | | | 274,897 |
| | 1.5 | % | | 0.4 | % |
Best Buy Co., Inc.(3) | | | 266,914 |
| | 1.5 | % | | 0.4 | % |
| |
(1) | Tenant occupied space within joint venture investments. |
| |
(2) | Tenant occupied space within wholly-owned property investments. |
| |
(3) | Tenant occupied space within wholly-owned property investments and joint venture investments. |
The following tables list the rentable area for long term leases subject to expiring leases during the next ten years and an aggregate figure for expirations in 20272028 and after, in the Account’s commercial (non-residential) properties that are both wholly-owned by the Account and held within the Account’s joint venture investments. While many of the leases contain renewal options with varying terms, these charts assume that none of the tenants exercise their renewal options, including those with terms that expired on December 31, 20162017 or are month to month leases.
Office Properties
| | Year of Lease Expiration | | Number of Tenants with Expiring Leases | | Rental Income Associated with Such Leases (in millions)(1) | | Expiring Rent as a % of Rental Revenue(1) | | Rentable Area Subject to Expiring Leases (sq. ft.) | | % of Total Rentable Area of Account’s Office Properties Represented by Expiring Leases | | Number of Tenants with Expiring Leases | | Rental Income Associated with Such Leases (in millions)(1) | | Expiring Rent as a % of Rental Revenue(1) | | Rentable Area Subject to Expiring Leases (sq. ft.) | | % of Total Rentable Area of Account’s Office Properties Represented by Expiring Leases |
| 2017 | | 155 |
| | $ | 20.8 |
| | 1.4 | % | | 1,314,447 |
| | 7.2 | % | |
| 2018 | | 142 |
| | 35.9 |
| | 2.5 | % | | 1,966,102 |
| | 10.8 | % | | 145 |
| | $ | 31.9 |
| | 2.0 | % | | 1,804,560 |
| | 9.8 | % |
| 2019 | | 115 |
| | 36.7 |
| | 2.6 | % | | 1,379,365 |
| | 7.5 | % | | 107 |
| | 26.6 |
| | 1.7 | % | | 1,490,087 |
| | 8.1 | % |
| 2020 | | 106 |
| | 27.4 |
| | 1.9 | % | | 1,353,970 |
| | 7.4 | % | | 112 |
| | 24.8 |
| | 1.6 | % | | 1,238,303 |
| | 6.8 | % |
| 2021 | | 103 |
| | 34.7 |
| | 2.4 | % | | 2,136,162 |
| | 11.7 | % | | 100 |
| | 39.7 |
| | 2.5 | % | | 2,169,627 |
| | 11.8 | % |
| 2022 | | 68 |
| | 21.4 |
| | 1.5 | % | | 1,266,230 |
| | 6.9 | % | | 86 |
| | 27.3 |
| | 1.7 | % | | 1,447,026 |
| | 7.9 | % |
| 2023 | | 37 |
| | 24.2 |
| | 1.7 | % | | 1,135,123 |
| | 6.2 | % | | 51 |
| | 31.2 |
| | 2.0 | % | | 1,076,236 |
| | 5.9 | % |
| 2024 | | 43 |
| | 29.4 |
| | 2.0 | % | | 1,232,281 |
| | 6.7 | % | | 49 |
| | 34.6 |
| | 2.2 | % | | 1,389,215 |
| | 7.6 | % |
| 2025 | | 46 |
| | 51.4 |
| | 3.6 | % | | 908,774 |
| | 5.0 | % | | 49 |
| | 38.8 |
| | 2.5 | % | | 1,075,773 |
| | 5.9 | % |
| 2026 | | 23 |
| | 36.2 |
| | 2.5 | % | | 1,235,690 |
| | 6.8 | % | | 23 |
| | 36.8 |
| | 2.3 | % | | 1,242,177 |
| | 6.8 | % |
| 2027 | | | 14 |
| | 9.5 |
| | 0.6 | % | | 283,086 |
| | 1.5 | % |
| Thereafter | | 34 |
| | 71.1 |
| | 5.0 | % | | 2,003,405 |
| | 11.0 | % | | 38 |
| | 157.8 |
| | 10.1 | % | | 2,421,977 |
| | 13.2 | % |
| Total | | 872 |
| | $ | 389.2 |
| | 27.1 | % | | 15,931,549 |
| | 87.2 | % | | 774 |
| | $ | 459.0 |
| | 29.2 | % | | 15,638,067 |
| | 85.3 | % |
Industrial Properties
| | Year of Lease Expiration | | Number of Tenants with Expiring Leases | | Rental Income Associated with Such Leases (in millions)(1) | | Expiring Rent as a % of Rental Revenue(1) | | Rentable Area Subject to Expiring Leases (sq. ft.) | | % of Total Rentable Area of Account’s Industrial Properties Represented by Expiring Leases | | Number of Tenants with Expiring Leases | | Rental Income Associated with Such Leases (in millions)(1) | | Expiring Rent as a % of Rental Revenue(1) | | Rentable Area Subject to Expiring Leases (sq. ft.) | | % of Total Rentable Area of Account’s Industrial Properties Represented by Expiring Leases |
| 2017 | | 89 |
| | $ | 8.2 |
| | 0.6 | % | | 3,254,873 |
| | 10.5 | % | |
| 2018 | | 83 |
| | 12.1 |
| | 0.8 | % | | 5,153,191 |
| | 16.7 | % | | 91 |
| | $ | 12.8 |
| | 0.8 | % | | 5,389,412 |
| | 17.9 | % |
| 2019 | | 87 |
| | 8.7 |
| | 0.6 | % | | 2,557,918 |
| | 8.3 | % | | 98 |
| | 8.6 |
| | 0.5 | % | | 2,831,141 |
| | 9.4 | % |
| 2020 | | 60 |
| | 16.4 |
| | 1.1 | % | | 5,642,327 |
| | 18.2 | % | | 84 |
| | 15.0 |
| | 1.0 | % | | 5,217,347 |
| | 17.3 | % |
| 2021 | | 44 |
| | 10.7 |
| | 0.7 | % | | 3,915,291 |
| | 12.7 | % | | 67 |
| | 15.7 |
| | 1.0 | % | | 4,182,295 |
| | 13.9 | % |
| 2022 | | 26 |
| | 7.3 |
| | 0.5 | % | | 4,372,421 |
| | 14.1 | % | | 68 |
| | 15.1 |
| | 1.0 | % | | 5,211,508 |
| | 17.3 | % |
| 2023 | | 8 |
| | 2.5 |
| | 0.2 | % | | 1,237,319 |
| | 4.0 | % | | 22 |
| | 6.7 |
| | 0.4 | % | | 1,671,885 |
| | 5.6 | % |
| 2024 | | 4 |
| | 1.6 |
| | 0.1 | % | | 690,208 |
| | 2.2 | % | | 10 |
| | 3.9 |
| | 0.2 | % | | 1,380,239 |
| | 4.6 | % |
| 2025 | | 6 |
| | 3.6 |
| | 0.3 | % | | 460,410 |
| | 1.5 | % | | 12 |
| | 5.0 |
| | 0.3 | % | | 705,155 |
| | 2.3 | % |
| 2026 | | 5 |
| | 5.3 |
| | 0.4 | % | | 1,176,157 |
| | 3.8 | % | | 6 |
| | 5.6 |
| | 0.4 | % | | 829,665 |
| | 2.8 | % |
| 2027 | | | 7 |
| | 1.0 |
| | 0.1 | % | | 293,352 |
| | 1.0 | % |
| Thereafter | | 3 |
| | 0.5 |
| | — | % | | 55,454 |
| | 0.2 | % | | 1 |
| | — |
| | — | % | | 19,320 |
| | 0.1 | % |
| Total | | 415 |
| | $ | 76.9 |
| | 5.3 | % | | 28,515,569 |
| | 92.2 | % | | 466 |
| | $ | 89.4 |
| | 5.7 | % | | 27,731,319 |
| | 92.2 | % |
Retail Properties
| | Year of Lease Expiration | | Number of Tenants with Expiring Leases | | Rental Income Associated with Such Leases (in millions)(1) | | Expiring Rent as a % of Rental Revenue(1) | | Rentable Area Subject to Expiring Leases (sq. ft.) | | % of Total Rentable Area of Account’s Retail Properties Represented by Expiring Leases | | Number of Tenants with Expiring Leases | | Rental Income Associated with Such Leases (in millions)(1) | | Expiring Rent as a % of Rental Revenue(1) | | Rentable Area Subject to Expiring Leases (sq. ft.) | | % of Total Rentable Area of Account’s Retail Properties Represented by Expiring Leases |
| 2017 | | 268 |
| | $ | 13.6 |
| | 0.9 | % | | 1,621,676 |
| | 8.8 | % | |
| 2018 | | 254 |
| | 18.1 |
| | 1.3 | % | | 1,665,860 |
| | 9.1 | % | | 257 |
| | $ | 17.8 |
| | 1.1 | % | | 1,412,539 |
| | 7.8 | % |
| 2019 | | 223 |
| | 15.4 |
| | 1.1 | % | | 1,749,541 |
| | 9.5 | % | | 258 |
| | 16.1 |
| | 1.0 | % | | 1,861,769 |
| | 10.3 | % |
| 2020 | | 222 |
| | 16.7 |
| | 1.2 | % | | 1,456,968 |
| | 7.9 | % | | 248 |
| | 18.4 |
| | 1.2 | % | | 1,607,886 |
| | 8.9 | % |
| 2021 | | 265 |
| | 20.1 |
| | 1.4 | % | | 2,309,103 |
| | 12.6 | % | | 263 |
| | 19.4 |
| | 1.2 | % | | 1,990,624 |
| | 11.0 | % |
| 2022 | | 150 |
| | 11.4 |
| | 0.8 | % | | 1,901,141 |
| | 10.3 | % | | 226 |
| | 15.8 |
| | 1.0 | % | | 2,305,081 |
| | 12.7 | % |
| 2023 | | 132 |
| | 11.5 |
| | 0.8 | % | | 1,192,618 |
| | 6.5 | % | | 161 |
| | 12.8 |
| | 0.8 | % | | 1,575,690 |
| | 8.7 | % |
| 2024 | | 120 |
| | 13.4 |
| | 0.9 | % | | 744,482 |
| | 4.1 | % | | 127 |
| | 13.4 |
| | 0.9 | % | | 753,031 |
| | 4.2 | % |
| 2025 | | 139 |
| | 20.5 |
| | 1.4 | % | | 976,008 |
| | 5.3 | % | | 140 |
| | 20.5 |
| | 1.3 | % | | 931,649 |
| | 5.1 | % |
| 2026 | | 101 |
| | 9.4 |
| | 0.7 | % | | 983,263 |
| | 5.4 | % | | 101 |
| | 10.4 |
| | 0.7 | % | | 931,213 |
| | 5.1 | % |
| 2027 | | | 77 |
| | 6.7 |
| | 0.4 | % | | 564,358 |
| | 3.1 | % |
| Thereafter | | 68 |
| | 15.0 |
| | 1.0 | % | | 1,129,481 |
| | 6.1 | % | | 47 |
| | 12.8 |
| | 0.8 | % | | 1,070,538 |
| | 5.9 | % |
| Total | | 1,942 |
| | $ | 165.1 |
| | 11.5 | % | | 15,730,141 |
| | 85.6 | % | | 1,905 |
| | $ | 164.1 |
| | 10.4 | % | | 15,004,378 |
| | 82.8 | % |
| |
(1) | Rental income includes income from wholly-owned properties, which is shown as Rental income on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, as well as income from properties held in joint venture investments, which is included in Income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
Certain leases provide for additional rental amounts based upon the recovery of actual operating expenses in excess of specified base amounts, sales volume or contractual increases as defined in the lease agreement. These contractual contingent rentals are not included in the table above.
The following table details the leasing activity during the year ended December 31, 2016.2017.
|
| | | |
| | Leasing Activity (sq. ft.) | |
| Vacant space beginning of year | 4,860,7685,382,901 |
| |
| Vacant space acquired during the year | 956,346413,658 |
| |
| Vacant space disposed of during the year | (66,09441,736 | ) | |
| Vacant space placed into service during the year | (8,460,7336,255,484 | ) | |
| Expiring leases during the year | 8,092,6146,186,475 |
| |
| Vacant space end of year | 5,382,9015,685,814 |
| |
| Average remaining lease term* | 51 Months48 months |
| |
*Includes office, industrial and retail properties.
Based on leases in place at December 31, 2016,2017, leases representing approximately 9.2%12.9% of net rentable area are scheduled to expire throughout 2017.2018. Rents associated with such lease expirations are generally at or below prevailing market rents in the Account’s primary metropolitan markets.
Residential Properties
The Account’s residential property investment portfolio consisted of 3638 properties as of December 31, 2016,2017, comprised of first class or luxury multi-family, garden, mid-rise, and high-rise apartment buildings, including one investment held in a joint venture. The portfolio contains approximately 11,75012,924 units located in 11 states and the District of Columbia. The portfolio was 92.5%93.5% leased as of December 31, 2016. Eleven2017. Ten of the residential properties in the portfolio are subject to mortgages, including one joint venture investment. The complexes generally contain one to three bedroom apartment units with a range of amenities, such as patios or balconies, washers and dryers, and central air conditioning. Many of these apartment communities have on-site fitness facilities, including some with swimming pools. Rents on each of the properties tend to be comparable with competitive communities and are not subject to rent regulation. The Account is resp
Account is responsibleonsible for the expenses of operating its residential properties. As of December 31, 2016,2017, the Account’s residential properties had an aggregate fair value of approximately $4.5 billion.
The following table contains detailed information regarding the apartment complexes in the Account’s portfolio as of December 31, 2016.2017.
| | | Property | | Location | | Number Of Units | | Average Unit Size (Sq. Ft.) | | Avg. Rent Per Unit/ Per Month | | Location | | Number Of Units | | Average Unit Size (Sq. Ft.) | | Avg. Rent Per Unit/ Per Month |
Palomino Park(1) | | Highlands Ranch, CO | | 1,184 |
| | 1,100 |
| | 1,658 |
| | Highlands Ranch, CO | | 1,184 |
| | 1,100 |
| | 1,765 |
|
Houston Apartment Porfolio(1) | | Houston, TX | | 877 |
| | 1,158 |
| | 1,722 |
| | Houston, TX | | 877 |
| | 1,158 |
| | 1,722 |
|
Greene Crossing | | Columbia, SC | | 726 |
| | 367 |
| | 747 |
| | Columbia, SC | | 727 |
| | 369 |
| | 830 |
|
Kierland Apartment Portfolio(1) | | Scottsdale, AZ | | 723 |
| | 1,048 |
| | 1,316 |
| |
The Bridges(2) | | | Minneapolis, MN | | 720 |
| | 262 |
| | 514 |
|
Orion on Orpington(2) | | | Orlando, FL | | 624 |
| | 324 |
| | 592 |
|
South Florida Apartment Portfolio(1) | | Boca Raton and Plantation, FL | | 550 |
| | 888 |
| | 1,343 |
| | Boca Raton and Plantation, FL | | 550 |
| | 888 |
| | 1,452 |
|
| MiMA | | New York, NY | | 500 |
| | 740 |
| | 5,099 |
| | New York, NY | | 500 |
| | 739 |
| | 4,547 |
|
The Knoll(2) | | | Minneapolis, MN | | 452 |
| | 230 |
| | 442 |
|
| Ashford Meadows Apartments | | Herndon, VA | | 440 |
| | 1,050 |
| | 1,712 |
| | Herndon, VA | | 440 |
| | 1,050 |
| | 1,712 |
|
| 803 Corday | | | Naperville, IL | | 440 |
| | 937 |
| | 1,540 |
|
| The Manor at Flagler Village | | Fort Lauderdale, FL | | 382 |
| | 964 |
| | 2,309 |
| | Fort Lauderdale, FL | | 382 |
| | 964 |
| | 2,309 |
|
| Holly Street Village | | Pasadena, CA | | 374 |
| | 879 |
| | 2,209 |
| | Pasadena, CA | | 374 |
| | 879 |
| | 2,318 |
|
| Mass Court | | Washington, D.C. | | 370 |
| | 834 |
| | 2,782 |
| | Washington, D.C. | | 371 |
| | 834 |
| | 2,791 |
|
| Casa Palma | | Coconut Creek, FL | | 350 |
| | 1,123 |
| | 1,908 |
| | Coconut Creek, FL | | 350 |
| | 1,123 |
| | 1,943 |
|
| The Caruth | | Dallas, TX | | 338 |
| | 1,168 |
| | 2,095 |
| |
| BLVD63 | | San Diego, CA | | 332 |
| | 1,250 |
| | 3,452 |
| |
| BLVD 63 | | | San Diego, CA | | 332 |
| | 1,250 |
| | 3,521 |
|
| The Maroneal | | Houston, TX | | 309 |
| | 928 |
| | 1,590 |
| | Houston, TX | | 309 |
| | 928 |
| | 1,590 |
|
| Union - South Lake Union | | Seattle, WA | | 284 |
| | 696 |
| | 2,065 |
| | Seattle, WA | | 284 |
| | 696 |
| | 2,065 |
|
| The Louis at 14th | | Washington, D.C. | | 268 |
| | 665 |
| | 3,075 |
| | Washington, D.C. | | 268 |
| | 665 |
| | 3,066 |
|
| The Palatine | | Arlington, VA | | 260 |
| | 1,055 |
| | 2,587 |
| | Arlington, VA | | 262 |
| | 1,055 |
| | 2,689 |
|
| Regents Court | | San Diego, CA | | 251 |
| | 886 |
| | 2,131 |
| | San Diego, CA | | 251 |
| | 886 |
| | 2,237 |
|
| Larkspur Courts | | Larkspur, CA | | 247 |
| | 1,001 |
| | 3,271 |
| | Larkspur, CA | | 248 |
| | 1,001 |
| | 3,273 |
|
| Oceano at Warner Center | | Woodland Hills, CA | | 244 |
| | 935 |
| | 2,170 |
| | Woodland Hill, CA | | 244 |
| | 935 |
| | 2,200 |
|
| Stella | | Marina Del Rey, CA | | 244 |
| | 970 |
| | 3,373 |
| | Marina Del Rey, CA | | 244 |
| | 970 |
| | 3,527 |
|
| 250 North 10th Street | | Brooklyn, NY | | 233 |
| | 676 |
| | 3,614 |
| | Brooklyn, NY | | 234 |
| | 676 |
| | 3,609 |
|
| The Woodley | | Washington, D.C. | | 212 |
| | 1,117 |
| | 4,631 |
| | Washington, D.C. | | 212 |
| | 1,117 |
| | 4,631 |
|
| Cliffs at Barton Creek | | Austin, TX | | 209 |
| | 953 |
| | 1,555 |
| | Austin, TX | | 210 |
| | 952 |
| | 1,615 |
|
| Circa Green Lake | | Seattle, WA | | 199 |
| | 765 |
| | 2,101 |
| | Seattle, WA | | 199 |
| | 765 |
| | 2,157 |
|
| The Manor Apartments | | | Plantation, FL | | 197 |
| | 977 |
| | 2,176 |
|
| The Corner | | New York, NY | | 196 |
| | 791 |
| | 6,164 |
| | New York, NY | | 196 |
| | 791 |
| | 6,442 |
|
| The Manor | | Plantation, FL | | 194 |
| | 979 |
| | 1,950 |
| |
| The Pepper Building | | Philadelphia, PA | | 184 |
| | 817 |
| | 1,820 |
| |
| The Legacy at Westwood | | Los Angeles, CA | | 183 |
| | 1,183 |
| | 4,667 |
| | Los Angeles, CA | | 187 |
| | 1,181 |
| | 4,804 |
|
| The Colorado | | New York, NY | | 173 |
| | 873 |
| | 6,220 |
| | New York, NY | | 175 |
| | 876 |
| | 6,298 |
|
| Allure at Camarillo | | | Camarillo, CA | | 165 |
| | 880 |
| | 2,036 |
|
| Prescott Wallingford Apartments | | Seattle, WA | | 154 |
| | 663 |
| | 1,810 |
| | Seattle, WA | | 154 |
| | 663 |
| | 1,888 |
|
| The Cordelia | | Portland, OR | | 135 |
| | 667 |
| | 1,757 |
| | Portland, OR | | 135 |
| | 667 |
| | 1,838 |
|
| Township Apartments | | Redwood City, CA | | 132 |
| | 914 |
| | 3,565 |
| | Redwood City, CA | | 132 |
| | 914 |
| | 3,565 |
|
| Westcreek | | Westlake Village, CA | | 126 |
| | 951 |
| | 2,530 |
| | Westlake Village, CA | | 126 |
| | 951 |
| | 2,563 |
|
| The Residences at the Village of Merrick Park | | Coral Gables, FL | | 120 |
| | 1,231 |
| | 3,384 |
| | Coral Gables, FL | | 120 |
| | 1,231 |
| | 3,484 |
|
| The Ashton | | Washington, D.C. | | 49 |
| | 1,612 |
| | 4,646 |
| | Washington, D.C. | | 49 |
| | 1,612 |
| | 4,277 |
|
| |
(1) | Represents a portfolio containing multiple properties. |
| |
(2) | This investment is a student housing asset. Units at this investment are rented per bedroom, and multiple bedrooms can exist in one unit. Average rent per month in the table above is reflective of average rent per bedroom. |
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
In the normal course of business, the Account may be named, from time to time, as a defendantor may be involved in various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions and other litigation.
The Account establishes an accrual for all litigation and regulatory matters when it believes it is partyprobable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Once established, accruals are adjusted, as appropriate, in light of additional information. The amount of loss ultimately incurred in relation to various claims and routine litigation arising inthose matters may be higher or lower than the ordinary courseamounts accrued for those matters.
As of business. Managementthe date of this annual report, management of the Account does not believe that the results of any such claims or litigation, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material effect on the Account’s business, financial position or results of operations.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
Market Information. There is no established public trading market for securities issued by the Account. Accumulation units in the Account are sold to eligible participants at the Account’s current accumulation unit value, which is based on the value of the Account’s then current net assets and are redeemable in accordance with the terms of the participant’s contract. For the period from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017, the high and low accumulation unit values for the Account were $398.329 and $381.785, respectively. For the period January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016, the high and low accumulation unit values for the Account were $381.636 and $362.267, respectively. For the period January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015, the high and low accumulation unit values for the Account were $362.925 and $335.860, respectively.
Holders. The approximate number of Account contract owners at December 31, 20162017 was 1,047,500.1,045,110.
Dividends. Not applicable.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans. Not applicable.
Use of Proceeds. Not applicable.
Purchases of Equity Securities by Issuer. Not applicable.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
The following selected financial data should be considered in conjunction with the Account’s consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements and notes provided in this Form 10-K (amounts in millions except for per accumulation unit amounts).
| | | | | Years Ended December 31, | | Years Ended December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Investment income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Real estate income, net | | $ | 546.4 |
| | $ | 486.2 |
| | $ | 457.0 |
| | $ | 391.0 |
| | $ | 388.7 |
| | $ | 582.0 |
| | $ | 546.4 |
| | $ | 486.2 |
| | $ | 457.0 |
| | $ | 391.0 |
|
| Income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships | | 161.8 |
| | 140.1 |
| | 148.1 |
| | 104.7 |
| | 80.9 |
| | 214.1 |
| | 161.8 |
| | 140.1 |
| | 148.1 |
| | 104.7 |
|
| Dividends and interest | | 58.9 |
| | 57.6 |
| | 47.7 |
| | 45.1 |
| | 35.3 |
| | 80.4 |
| | 58.9 |
| | 57.6 |
| | 47.7 |
| | 45.1 |
|
| Total investment income | | 767.1 |
| | 683.9 |
| | 652.8 |
| | 540.8 |
| | 504.9 |
| | 876.5 |
| | 767.1 |
| | 683.9 |
| | 652.8 |
| | 540.8 |
|
| Expenses | | 202.0 |
| | 182.9 |
| | 163.0 |
| | 145.1 |
| | 136.7 |
| | 205.2 |
| | 202.0 |
| | 182.9 |
| | 163.0 |
| | 145.1 |
|
| Investment income, net | | 565.1 |
| | 501.0 |
| | 489.8 |
| | 395.7 |
| | 368.2 |
| | 671.3 |
| | 565.1 |
| | 501.0 |
| | 489.8 |
| | 395.7 |
|
| Net realized and unrealized gains on investments and mortgage loans payable | | 619.8 |
| | 1,145.4 |
| | 1,628.4 |
| | 1,060.2 |
| | 1,011.2 |
| | 387.1 |
| | 619.8 |
| | 1,145.4 |
| | 1,628.4 |
| | 1,060.2 |
|
| Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | | 1,184.9 |
| | 1,646.4 |
| | 2,118.2 |
| | 1,455.9 |
| | 1,379.4 |
| | 1,058.4 |
| | 1,184.9 |
| | 1,646.4 |
| | 2,118.2 |
| | 1,455.9 |
|
| Participant transactions, net | | 759.8 |
| | 884.6 |
| | 802.9 |
| | 916.3 |
| | 894.8 |
| | (420.5 | ) | | 759.8 |
| | 884.6 |
| | 802.9 |
| | 916.3 |
|
| TIAA redemption of Liquidity Units | | ��� |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (325.4 | ) | | (940.3 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (325.4 | ) |
| Net increase in net assets | | $ | 1,944.7 |
| | $ | 2,531.0 |
| | $ | 2,921.1 |
| | $ | 2,046.8 |
| | $ | 1,333.9 |
| | $ | 637.9 |
| | $ | 1,944.7 |
| | $ | 2,531.0 |
| | $ | 2,921.1 |
| | $ | 2,046.8 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years Ended December 31, | | Years Ended December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Total assets | | $ | 26,985.2 |
| | $ | 24,399.4 |
| | $ | 22,408.7 |
| | $ | 19,417.1 |
| | $ | 17,378.6 |
| | $ | 27,453.6 |
| | $ | 26,985.2 |
| | $ | 24,399.4 |
| | $ | 22,408.7 |
| | $ | 19,417.1 |
|
| Total liabilities | | 2,680.5 |
| | 2,039.4 |
| | 2,579.7 |
| | 2,509.2 |
| | 2,517.5 |
| | 2,511.0 |
| | 2,680.5 |
| | 2,039.4 |
| | 2,579.7 |
| | 2,509.2 |
|
| Total net assets | | $ | 24,304.7 |
| | $ | 22,360.0 |
| | $ | 19,829.0 |
| | $ | 16,907.9 |
| | $ | 14,861.1 |
| | $ | 24,942.6 |
| | $ | 24,304.7 |
| | $ | 22,360.0 |
| | $ | 19,829.0 |
| | $ | 16,907.9 |
|
| Number of per accumulation unit amounts | | 62.4 |
| | 60.4 |
| | 57.9 |
| | 55.3 |
| | 53.3 |
| | 61.3 |
| | 62.4 |
| | 60.4 |
| | 57.9 |
| | 55.3 |
|
| Net asset value, per accumulation unit | | 381.636 |
| | 362.773 |
| | 335.393 |
| | 298.872 |
| | 272.569 |
| | $ | 398.329 |
| | $ | 381.636 |
| | $ | 362.773 |
| | $ | 335.393 |
| | $ | 298.872 |
|
| Mortgage loans payable | | $ | 2,332.1 |
| | $ | 1,794.4 |
| | $ | 2,373.8 |
| | $ | 2,279.1 |
| | $ | 2,282.6 |
| | $ | 2,238.3 |
| | $ | 2,332.1 |
| | $ | 1,794.4 |
| | $ | 2,373.8 |
| | $ | 2,279.1 |
|
Quarterly Selected Financial Data
The following quarterly selected unaudited financial data for each full quarter of 20162017 and 20152016 are derived from the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements of the Account for the years ended December 31, 20162017 and 20152016 (amounts in millions). | | | | | 2016 | | Year Ended December 31, 2016 | | 2017 | | Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
| For the Three Months Ended | | For the Three Months Ended | |
| March 31 | | June 30 | | September 30 | | December 31 | | March 31 | | June 30 | | September 30 | | December 31 | |
| Investment income, net | | $ | 121.7 |
| | $ | 153.0 |
| | $ | 136.5 |
| | $ | 153.9 |
| | $ | 565.1 |
| | $ | 139.2 |
| | $ | 166.0 |
| | $ | 180.6 |
| | $ | 185.5 |
| | $ | 671.3 |
|
| Net realized and unrealized gain on investments and mortgage loans payable | | 302.1 |
| | 144.5 |
| | 25.9 |
| | 147.3 |
| | 619.8 |
| | 135.1 |
| | 32.3 |
| | 86.2 |
| | 133.5 |
| | 387.1 |
|
| Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | | $ | 423.8 |
| | $ | 297.5 |
| | $ | 162.4 |
| | $ | 301.2 |
| | $ | 1,184.9 |
| | $ | 274.3 |
| | $ | 198.3 |
| | $ | 266.8 |
| | $ | 319.0 |
| | $ | 1,058.4 |
|
| Total return | | 1.89 | % | | 1.28 | % | | 0.68 | % | | 1.26 | % | | 5.20 | % | | 1.13 | % | | 0.81 | % | | 1.08 | % | | 1.29 | % | | 4.37 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2015 | | Year Ended December 31, 2015 | | 2016 | | Year Ended December 31, 2016 |
| For the Three Months Ended | | For the Three Months Ended | |
| March 31 | | June 30 | | September 30 | | December 31 | | March 31 | | June 30 | | September 30 | | December 31 | |
| Investment income, net | | $ | 103.5 |
| | $ | 125.9 |
| | $ | 135.2 |
| | $ | 136.4 |
| | $ | 501.0 |
| | $ | 121.7 |
| | $ | 153.0 |
| | $ | 136.5 |
| | $ | 153.9 |
| | $ | 565.1 |
|
| Net realized and unrealized gain on investments and mortgage loans payable | | 490.4 |
| | 149.3 |
| | 287.2 |
| | 218.5 |
| | 1,145.4 |
| | 302.1 |
| | 144.5 |
| | 25.9 |
| | 147.3 |
| | 619.8 |
|
| Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | | $ | 593.9 |
| | $ | 275.2 |
| | $ | 422.4 |
| | $ | 354.9 |
| | $ | 1,646.4 |
| | $ | 423.8 |
| | $ | 297.5 |
| | $ | 162.4 |
| | $ | 301.2 |
| | $ | 1,184.9 |
|
| Total return | | 2.98 | % | | 1.33 | % | | 2.00 | % | | 1.63 | % | | 8.16 | % | | 1.89 | % | | 1.28 | % | | 0.68 | % | | 1.26 | % | | 5.20 | % |
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF THE ACCOUNT’S FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The following discussion and analysis of the Account's financial condition and results of operations should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and notes contained in this report and with consideration to the sub-section entitled “Forward-looking Statements,” which begins below, and the section entitled “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” The past performance of the Account is not indicative of future results.
Forward-looking Statements
Some statements in this Form 10-K which are not historical facts may be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include statements about management’s expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies for the future, include the assumptions and beliefs underlying these forward-looking statements, and are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about the real estate industry, domestic and global economic conditions, including conditions in the credit and capital markets, the sectors, and markets in which the Account invests and operates, and the transactions described in this Form 10-K. While management believes the assumptions underlying any of its forward-looking statements and information to be reasonable, such information may be subject to uncertainties and may involve certain risks which may be difficult to predict and are beyond management’s control. These risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:
Acquiring and Owning Real Estate. The risks associated with acquiring and owning real property, including general economic and real estate market conditions, the availability of, and economic cost associated with, financing the Account’s properties, the risk that the Account’s properties become too concentrated (whether by geography, sector or by tenant mix), competition for acquiring real estate properties, leasing risk (including tenant defaults) and the risk of uninsured losses at properties (including due to terrorism, natural disasters, and acts of violence);
Selling Real Estate. The risk that the sales price of a property might differ, perhaps significantly, from its estimated or appraised value, leading to losses or reduced profits to the Account, the risk that the Account might not be able to sell a property at a particular time for a price which management believes represents its fair or full value, the risk of a lack of availability of financing (for potential purchasers of the Account’s properties), risks associated with disruptions in the credit and capital markets, and the risk that the Account may be required to make significant expenditures before the Account is able to market and/or sell a property;
Valuation. The risks associated with property valuations, including the fact that appraisals can be subjective in a number of respects and the fact that the Account’s appraisals are generally obtained on a quarterly basis and there may be periods in between appraisals of a property during which the value attributed to the property for purposes of the Account’s daily accumulation unit value may be more or less than the actual realizable value of the property;
Borrowing. Risks associated with financing the Account’s properties, including the risk of default on loans secured by the Account’s properties (which could lead to foreclosure), the risk of default under unsecured line of credit or credit facilities underwritten by third-party lenders, the risk associated with high loan-to-value ratios on the Account’s properties (including the fact that the Account may have limited, or no net value in such a property), the risk that significant sums of cash could be required to make principal and interest payments on the loans and the risk that the Account may not have the ability to obtain financing or refinancing on favorable terms (or at all), which may be aggravated by general disruptions in credit and capital markets;
Participant Transactions and Cash Management. Investment risk associated with participant transactions, in particular that (i) significant net participant transfers out of the Account may impair our ability to pursue or consummate new investment opportunities that are otherwise attractive to the Account and/ or may result in sales of real estate-related assets to generate liquidity, (ii) significant net participant transfers into the Account may result, on a temporary basis, in our cash holdings and/or holdings in liquid realnon-real estate-related investments exceeding our long-term targeted holding levels and (iii) high levels of cash and liquid non-real
estate-related investments in the Account during times of appreciating real estate values can impair the Account’s overall return;
Joint Venture Investments. The risks associated with joint ventures organized as limited partnerships or limited liability companies, as applicable, including the risk that a co-venturer may have interests or goals inconsistent with that of the Account, that a co-venturer may have financial difficulties, and the risk that the Account may have limited rights with respect to operation of the property and transfer of the Account’s interest;
Regulatory Matters. Uncertainties associated with environmental liability and regulations and other governmental regulatory matters such as zoning laws, rent control laws, and property taxes;
Foreign Investments. The risks associated with purchasing, owning and disposing foreign investments (primarily foreign real estate properties)properties, foreign real estate loans, and foreign mezzanine and other debt), including political risk, the risk associated with foreign currency fluctuations (whether hedged or not), regulatory and taxation risks and risks of enforcing judgments;
Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts of interest associated with TIAA serving as investment manager of the Account and provider of the liquidity guarantee at the same time as TIAA and its affiliates are serving as an investment manager to other real estate accounts or funds, including conflicts associated with satisfying its fiduciary duties to all such accounts and funds associated with purchasing, selling and leasing of properties;
Required Property Sales. The risk that, if TIAA were to own too large a percentage of the Account’s accumulation units through funding the liquidity guarantee (as determined by the independent fiduciary), the independent fiduciary could require the sales of properties to reduce TIAA’s ownership interest, which sales could occur at times and at prices that depress the sale proceeds to the Account;
Government and Government Agency Securities. Risks associated with investment securities issued by U.S. government agencies and U.S. government-sponsored entities, including the risk that the issuer may not have their securities backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, and that transaction activity may fluctuate significantly from time to time, which could negatively impact the value of the securities and the Account’s ability to dispose of a security at a favorable time; and
Liquid Assets and Securities. Risks associated with investments in real estate-related liquid assets (which could include, from time to time, registered or unregistered REIT securities and CMBS), and non-real estate-related liquid assets, including:
Financial/credit risk—Risks that the issuer will not be able to pay principal and interest when due or that the issuer’s earnings will fall;
Market volatility risk—Risk that the changing conditions in financial markets may cause the Account’s investments to experience price volatility;
Interest rate volatility risk—Risk that interest rate volatility may affect the Account’s current income from an investment;investment or the pricing of that investment. In general, changing interest rates could have unpredictable effects on the markets and may expose markets to heightened volatility; and
Deposit/money market risk—Risks that the Account could experience losses if banks fail.
More detailed discussions of certain of these risk factors are contained in the section of this Form 10-K entitled “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and also in the section entitled “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical experience or management’s present expectations.
Caution should be taken not to place undue reliance on management’s forward-looking statements, which represent management’s views only as of the date that this report is filed. Neither management nor the Account undertake any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, changed assumptions, future events or otherwise.
Commercial real estate market statistics discussed in this section are obtained by the Account from sources that management considers reliable, but some of the data are preliminary for the year or quarter ended December 31, 20162017 and may be subsequently revised. Prior period data may have been adjusted to reflect updated calculations. Investors should not rely exclusively on the data presented below in forming a judgment regarding the current or prospective performance of the commercial real estate market generally.
20162017 U.S. ECONOMIC AND COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE OVERVIEW
The Account invests primarily in high-quality, core real estate in order to meet its investment objective of obtaining favorable long-term returns through rental income and the appreciation of its real estate holdings.
Economic Overview and Outlook
Economic growth continued at a modest paceThe U.S. economy was resilient during the fourth quarter of 2016.2017, despite political uncertainty and several major natural disasters. According to the “advance estimate” from the Bureau of Economic Analysis (“BEA”), U.S. Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”) grew at a 1.9% annual rategrowth moderated slightly to 2.6% in the fourth quarter as compared to 3.5% duringfrom 3.2% in the third quarter. Consumer spending continued to makemade the largest contribution. Growthcontribution, but growth was also supported by business investment, particularly on equipment, the housing market, and housing, which contributedgovernment spending. The trade deficit and weak inventories brought down growth. Despite the moderation in fourth quarter growth, the current three-quarter stretch for GDP growth was the strongest in three years. For all of 2017, GDP increased at a 2.3% annual rate compared to GDP for the first time since early1.5% in 2016. The strong dollar and weaker global economy weighed on export activity, which reduced GDP growth by 0.53%. TheU.S. labor market also continued to expand during the fourth quarter. The Bureau of Labor Statistics ("BLS") reported that 445,000 jobs were added during the quarter, as compared to 716,000 during the third quarter. Nearly 2.2 million jobs were added in 2016, as compared to 2.7 million in 2015. A slowdown in job growth2017, and is at this point in the cycle is not unexpected, as the US labor market is approaching “full employment”,or near full employment, a term used to indicate a labor market operating with little to no slack. Bureau of Labor Statistics data indicate that fourth quarter job growth totaled 647,000 as compared to 425,000 during the third quarter. For the year, 2.2 million jobs were added, generally consistent with 2.3 million in 2016. The unemployment rate ended the yearfourth quarter at 4.7%4.1%, down from 5.0%4.7% at year-end 2015.the end of 2016 and has not been this low since late 2000.
Economic Indicators*
| | | | | 3Q 2016 | | 4Q 2016 | | 2016 | | Forecast | | 2017 | | 1Q 2017 | | 2Q 2017 | | 3Q 2017 | | 4Q 2017 | | Forecast |
| 2017 | | 2018 | 2018 | | 2019 |
Economy(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gross Domestic Product (GDP) | | 3.5% | | 1.9% | | 1.6% | | 2.3% | | 2.4% | |
| Gross Domestic Product ("GDP") | | | 2.3% | | 1.2% | | 3.1% | | 3.2% | | 2.6% | | 2.7% | | 2.4% |
| Employment Growth (Thousands) | | 716 | | 445 | | 2,157 | | 2,000 | | 2,200 | | 2,173 | | 532 | | 569 | | 425 | | 647 | | 1,986 | | 1,644 |
| Unemployment Rate | | 4.9% | | 4.7% | | 4.9% | | 4.6% | | 4.5% | | 4.4% | | 4.5% | | 4.3% | | 4.2% | | 4.1% | | 3.9% | | 3.8% |
Interest Rates(2) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 10 Year Treasury | | 1.6% | | 2.1% | | 1.8% | | 2.7% | | 3.1% | | 2.3% | | 2.4% | | 2.3% | | 2.2% | | 2.4% | | 2.7% | | 3.2% |
Sources: BEA, BLS, Federal Reserve, Blue Chip Consensus Forecasts, and Moody’s Analytics
| |
| * | Data subject to revision |
| |
(1) | GDP growth rates are annual rates. Quarterly unemployment rates are the reported value for the final month of the quarter while average annual values represent a twelve-month average. |
| |
(2) | The Treasury rates are an average over the stated time period. |
The Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) voted in December voted to raise the federal funds rate to a range of 0.50%-0.75%1.25%-1.50%, based on its assessment of “roughly balanced risks” to the near-term outlookgrowing optimism regarding economic growth and current and expectedemployment. The labor market conditionshas continued to strengthen and inflation. economic activity is rising at a solid rate. Despite hurricane-related fluctuations, job gains have been solid, and the unemployment rate has continued to decline. Household spending has been expanding at a moderate rate, and growth in business fixed investment has picked up in recent quarters. The increase wasmarked the firstthird 25 basis-point increase of 2017 and fifth hike since December 2015 and only the second rate hike in a decade. Materials released following the meeting indicated the potential for three additional quarter-point rate hikes in 2017. FOMC committee members noted in the minutes released following2015. Following the December meeting2017 increase, FOMC chairperson Janet Yellen noted that “economic conditions will evolvetax reform could potentially drive an increase in a manner that will warrant only gradual increases in the federal funds rate.” In late January 2017, the FOMC voted to hold the federal funds rate at the 0.50%-0.75% range.GDP growth.
Economic conditions suggest a continued positive foundation for real estate performance in 2017.2018. However, uncertainty surrounding the economic and political outlook has increased. While post-election policy proposals are still being finalized, it seems likely that stronger economic growth will occur in the near term but with higherInterest rates of inflation. The presidential election triggered stock market gains on expectations of a pro-business agenda, potential tax cuts, and government spending on infrastructure. This has already contributed to rising interest rates,have been increasing, and the Federal Reserve may be prompted to respond more aggressively with future increases than previously anticipated.anticipated if recently enacted fiscal policy proves to be inflationary. Yields on U.S. Treasuries rose from under 2.00% to 2.50%2.60% as of early 20172018 due to expectedexpectations of stronger economic growth and higher inflation over the longer term. Additionally, significant changes to the tax law, government spending, trade and immigration policies, and the regulatory environment are possible. Some policy proposals could generate near-term economic benefits, while others, such as restrictive trade and immigration policies, could have negative economic impacts over the longer term.
Economists’ expectations for the U.S. economy have not changed materially as of early 2017.2018. Macroeconomic imbalances that have characterized previous downturns do not appear evident, despite the mature phase of the expansion, which is now entering its eighthninth year. Consequently, the January 20172018 Blue Chip Economic Indicators publication puts
the odds of a 20172018 recession at 16%, down from 18%. a year ago. Blue Chip economists expect a modest near-term boost to GDP in 20172018 and 20182019 to 2.3%2.7% and 2.4%, respectively, as compared to the 1.6%2.3% annual rate for 2016.2017. Contributing factors include anticipated cuts in corporate and personal income tax rates which could spur stronger business and consumer spending and increased potential government spending on infrastructure. Employment growth is expected to grow by two millionremain steady in 2017, despite the2018, due to a tight labor market and shrinking numbers of skilled workers. Continued GDP and employment growth of this magnitude would support ongoing improvement in commercial real estate market conditions.
Real Estate Market Conditions and Outlook
Commercial real estate markets weretransaction activity remained healthy, andbut less active than during the fourth quarter of 2016. Tenant demand for commercial space was generally steady. Construction has started to increase compared to post-recession lows, but remains historicallymoderate across most property types. Real Capital Analytics reported that sales of office, industrial, retail, multi-family and other commercial properties totaled $130$122.3 billion in the fourth quarter of 2016,2017, down 20%13% from fourth quarter of 2015.2016. For all of 2016,2017, transaction volume totaled $470 billion. The 10.0% decline compared with 2015 volume was attributable to a large decline in portfolio and entity sales. Single asset sales, by comparison, were virtually unchanged.$463.9 billion; down 7% from 2016 levels. The Green Street Advisors’ Commercial Property Price Index (“CPPI”) was flat during the fourth quarter but increased 3.0% overall in 2016. However, most of the price gains occurred during the first half of the year, while values werehas been relatively flat duringthroughout 2017, with a less than 1% decline in 2017 as compared to 2016. Reflecting changes in consumer spending and growth of e-commerce, the second half.industrial and regional mall CPPI had the largest swings of 9% and -11%, respectively, over the past 12 months.
The NAREIT All Equity REIT index registered its secondfourth consecutive quarterly declineincrease during the fourth quarter 2016 when the index fellincreased 3.3%2.48%, as compared to a 1.2% decline1.11% increase during the third quarter. For the year, the NAREIT All Equity REIT index posted an 8.6%8.67% gain, essentially the same as compared to 12.0% for the S&P 500. NAREIT returns weakened during the second half of the year amid concerns about rising interest rates.2016. For the quarter ending December 31, 2016,2017, the NCREIF Fund Index Open-End Diversified Core Equity (“NFI-ODCE”) Equal Weight total return, net of fees held relatively steady at 1.95%increased considerably to 1.94% compared to third quarter’s 1.96%1.68% total return. For the year, the NFI-ODCE Equal Weight total return, net of fees was 8.36%.6.92% The NFI-ODCE is a fund-level return index which includes property investments at ownership share, cash balances, and leverage. The Account’s real estate assets generated a 1.70% total return during the fourth quarter. Total returns were positive for the 31st consecutive quarter, but at this stage in the cycle, income is the primary driver of returns.
Data for the Account’s top five markets in terms of market value as of December 31, 20162017 are provided below. These five markets represent 47.6%46.1% of the Account’s total real estate portfolio. Across all markets, the Account’s properties are 92.1%92.0% leased. As indicated by the table below, the Account’sOccupancy for properties in four of its five top markets average at or around 90% leased. Occupancy in the Account’s Los Angeles propertiesWashington D.C. market is weaker,the weakest of the top five, reflective of elevated vacancy at two of the Account’s office assets there. However, recentassets. Recently signed leases signedwill increase future occupancy at both properties will help lift occupancy in subsequent quarters.these assets.
| | | Top 5 Metro Areas by Fair Value | | Account % Leased Fair Value Weighted* | | Number of Property Investments | | Metro Area Fair Value as a % of Total RE Portfolio** | | Metro Area Fair Value as a % of Total Investments** | | Account % Leased Fair Value Weighted* | | Number of Property Investments | | Metro Area Fair Value as a % of Total RE Portfolio** | | Metro Area Fair Value as a % of Total Investments** |
| New York-Jersey City-White Plains, NY-NJ | | 94.2 | % | | 15 | | 12.8 | % | | 10.1 | % | | 93.4% | | 16 | | 12.9% | | 10.3% |
| Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV | | 88.1 | % | | 14 | | 12.2 | % | | 9.6 | % | | 85.9% | | 13 | | 11.2% | | 8.9% |
| Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA | | 83.4 | % | | 12 | | 9.8 | % | | 7.7 | % | | 89.9% | | 12 | | 8.8% | | 7.0% |
| Boston, MA | | 91.0 | % | | 5 | | 7.1 | % | | 5.6 | % | | 91.7% | | 5 | | 6.9% | | 5.5% |
| Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA | | 88.6 | % | | 6 | | 5.7 | % | | 4.5 | % | |
| San Francisco-Redwood City-South San Francisco, CA | | | 89.7% | | 8 | | 6.3% | | 5.0% |
*Weighted by fair value, which differs from the calculations provided for market comparisons to CBRE-EA data and are used here to reflect the fair value of the Account’s monetary investments in those markets.
**Wholly-owned properties are represented at fair value and gross of any debt, while joint venture properties are represented at the net equity value.
Office
CB Richard Ellis Econometric Advisors (“CBRE-EA”) reported that the national office vacancy rate edged downrose to 12.9% during fourth quarter from 13.0% during the fourth quarter. The change in vacancy reflects a 10 basis-point increase from the third quarter and 13.1% at year-end 2015.as well as from the end of year 2016 rate of 12.9%. The vacancy rate continued its slow and steady progress towardsincrease represents the previous cyclical low of 12.4%, which was achieved in the second quarter of 2007.first year-over-year increase since 2010. Conditions varied across markets, but CBRE-EA data indicate that on a national rent growth slowed to 1.3%basis, rents increased 1.8% in 2016,2017, as compared to 4.0%1.3% growth in 2015.2016. Demand for office space is driven by employment trends in office-using sectors such as finance and professional & business services. In the fourth quarter, job growth slowedremained steady in both. The financial services sector added 41,00021,000 jobs during the fourth quarter as compared to 44,00033,000 in the third quarter while the professional and business services sector increased by 133,000115,000 jobs asduring the fourth quarter compared to 198,000 previously.120,000 in the third quarter. The financial services and professional and business services sectors added 134,000 and 527,000 jobs, respectively. For comparison, those same sectors added 176,000 and 534,000 jobs, respectively for 2016. Supply has picked upincreased from its pre-recessionpost-recession lows, but continued moderateprojected steady employment growth bodes well for office market conditions in most major metropolitan areas in 2017.2018.
The CBRE-EA reported market vacancy rates in the Account’s top five office markets declinedremained steady during the fourth quarter of 2016, and all were below the national average2017, except in San Francisco where increasing supply caused vacancy rates to increase. Market vacancy rates in Washington, D.C. WithDC are elevated despite office-using employment growing at a favorable cliprate in the metro division, it has been thedivision. The smaller federal government footprint, along with a swollen pipeline of new supply that has contributed to the supply-demand mismatchhigher vacancy levels in the office market there.
compared to other markets. The vacancy rate for the Account’s office portfolio improved to 12.9%14.1% during fourth quarter as compared to 14.2%15.1% in the third quarter. The average vacancy rate of the Account’s properties in San FranciscoBoston, Washington D.C., New York, and Washington, D.C.Seattle are both belowabove their respective market averages. The average vacancy rate ofVacancy in the Account’s properties in New York increasedmarket remains high, and was impacted by the acquisition of a roughly 139,000 sq. ft.can be partially attributed to an industrial building that was 81% leased at the time of purchase. The property is expected to undergo a renovation and repositioning in order to take advantage of its location in the tech-favored Midtown South submarket of Manhattan. The increase in vacancy among the Account's Bostonbeing repositioned for office properties was largely related to the renewal of one large tenant into a smaller footprint at the building. As part of the renewal, some space was given back at the end of 2016, with more expected in 2018.use.
| | | | | | | | | Account Square Foot Weighted Average Vacancy | | Market Vacancy* | | | | Account Square Foot Weighted Average Vacancy | | Market Vacancy* |
| Top 5 Office Metropolitan Areas | | Total Sector by Metro Area ($M) | | % of Total Investments | | 2016 Q4 | | 2016 Q3 | | 2016 Q4 | | 2016 Q3 | | Total Sector by Metro Area ($M) | | % of Total Investments | | 2017 Q4 | | 2017 Q3 | | 2017 Q4 | | 2017 Q3 |
| Account / Nation | | | | | | 12.9 | % | | 14.2 | % | | 12.9 | % | | 13.0 | % | | | | | | 14.1% | | 15.1% | | 13.0% | | 12.9% |
| Boston, MA | | | $ | 1,459.5 |
| | 5.4% | | 11.0% | | 10.9% | | 9.8% | | 9.8% |
| Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV | | $ | 1,502.4 |
| | 5.6 | % | | 13.2 | % | | 12.6 | % | | 15.8 | % | | 16.1 | % | | 1,450.2 |
| | 5.3% | | 16.5% | | 16.5% | | 15.3% | | 15.4% |
| Boston, MA | | 1,451.6 |
| | 5.4 | % | | 11.4 | % | | 9.5 | % | | 9.7 | % | | 9.8 | % | |
| San Francisco-Redwood City-South San Francisco, CA | | | 1,140.5 |
| | 4.2% | | 7.5% | | 8.3% | | 7.8% | | 7.1% |
| New York-Jersey City-White Plains, NY-NJ | | 1,107.1 |
| | 4.2 | % | | 16.2 | % | | 15.7 | % | | 9.6 | % | | 9.8 | % | | 1,123.7 |
| | 4.1% | | 22.1% | | 22.5% | | 9.4% | | 9.4% |
| San Francisco-Redwood City-South San Francisco, CA | | 1,039.5 |
| | 3.9 | % | | 3.8 | % | | 3.2 | % | | 6.5 | % | | 6.7 | % | |
| Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA | | 954.6 |
| | 3.6 | % | | 11.3 | % | | 11.4 | % | | 8.2 | % | | 8.6 | % | | 977.7 |
| | 3.6% | | 8.2% | | 8.2% | | 7.6% | | 7.8% |
| |
| * | Source: CBRE-EA. Vacancy is defined as the percentage of space vacant. The Account’s vacancy is defined as the square foot-weighted percentage of un-leased space. |
Market vacancy is defined as the percentage of space vacant. The Account’s vacancy is defined as the square foot-weighted percentage of un-leased space.
Industrial
The industrial sector remains solid and continues to expand supported by thirty consecutive quarters of positive net absorption. Industrial market conditions benefit from economic growth, which includes industrial production, international trade flows, and consumer spending. The appreciation of the dollar continued to weigh on export activity, but the decline in exports has been partially offset by growth in imports, which are a key driver of warehouse demand. Also benefitingStrong consumer spending has also had a positive impact on the industrial market, has been strong consumer spending, particularly in the e-commerce space, which has supported strong demand for warehouse space in many markets. Economic conditions heldand the increasing demand for warehouse space is reflected in the national industrial availability rate to 8.2% duringof 7.4% for 2017, the fourth quarter.lowest rate since 2001. Construction has increased in response to historically low availability rates, but is concentrated in relatively few markets. Consequently, nationalmarkets and often with a tenant lined up. National rent growth averaged 6.6%remained strong at 5.0% in 2016,2017 as compared to 5.3%5.1% in 2015.2016. With supply beginning to increase, however, the industrial market may be approaching a plateau; vacancy improvements are likely to become more modest, and near-term rentalrent growth expectations more tempered.
Market availability rates as reported by CBRE-EA were atnear or below the national average in four of the Account’s top five industrial markets. Conditions were challenged in Houston during 2016 where increasing supply and moderating demand contributed to above average availability. As shown in the following table, the weighted average vacancy rate of the Account’s industrial properties increaseddecreased during the fourth quarter to 7.7%7.6%, up from 6.1%9.7% during the third quarter. The availability rateassets in the Account’s Houston industrial portfolio was substantiallyLos Angeles market saw a decrease in vacancy from the third quarter; however, vacancy sits 1.3% above the market average reflectiveand is attributed to the timing of an empty building located inlease expirations. In the north submarket, andTacoma-Lakewood market, vacancy decreased to 1.7% due to the acquisitionrecent signing of two newly built industrial buildings. The new acquisitions are located within the Account’s existing investment in the industrial business park, which was initially acquired in 2015. On the whole, the Account’s buildings in the park are 51.7% leased. Availability rates in eacha number of the Account’s other four top industrial markets were near or well below their respective market averages.small leases.
| | | | | | | | | Account Square Foot Weighted Average Vacancy | | Market Vacancy* | | | | Account Square Foot Weighted Average Vacancy | | Market Vacancy* |
| Top 5 Industrial Metropolitan Areas | | Total Sector by Metro Area ($M) | | % of Total Investments | | 2016 Q4 | | 2016 Q3 | | 2016 Q4 | | 2016 Q3 | | Total Sector by Metro Area ($M) | | % of Total Investments | | 2017 Q4 | | 2017 Q3 | | 2017 Q4 | | 2017 Q3 |
| Account / Nation | | | | | | 7.7 | % | | 6.1 | % | | 8.2 | % |
| 8.2 | % | | | | | | 7.6% | | 9.7% | | 7.4% | | 7.4% |
| Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA | | $ | 913.0 |
| | 3.4 | % | | 3.9 | % | | 3.9 | % | | 7.5 | % | | 7.4 | % | | $ | 783.6 |
| | 2.9% | | 0.0% | | 0.0% | | 6.5% | | 6.2% |
| Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA | | 304.2 |
| | 1.1 | % | | 4.5 | % | | 8.2 | % | | 3.9 | % | | 3.3 | % | | 327.8 |
| | 1.2% | | 5.7% | | 9.0% | | 4.4% | | 4.2% |
| New York-Jersey City-White Plains, NY-NJ | | | 309.1 |
| | 1.1% | | 2.4% | | 2.4% | | 6.9% | | 6.6% |
| Tacoma-Lakewood, WA | | 260.8 |
| | 1.0 | % | | 2.1 | % | | 1.4 | % | | 4.3 | % | | 4.4 | % | | 307.7 |
| | 1.1% | | 1.7% | | 7.3% | | 4.7% | | 4.7% |
| Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX | | 254.0 |
| | 1.0 | % | | 3.5 | % | | 3.8 | % | | 8.1 | % | | 8.2 | % | | 266.5 |
| | 1.0% | | 4.7% | | 4.7% | | 7.9% | | 7.6% |
| Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX | | 233.2 |
| | 0.9 | % | | 37.1 | % | | 20.3 | % | | 9.3 | % | | 9.0 | % | |
Market availability is the percentage of space available for rent. Account vacancy is the square foot-weighted percentage of un-leased space.
CBRE-EA considers Tacoma part of the Seattle industrial market. Market availability rates reflect the Seattle total.
Multi-Family
Apartment demand is generated from a combination of economic, demographic and socio-economic factors including job growth, household formations, and trends in the U.S. homeownership rate. Of the four main property types, the apartment market is likely the furthest along in its real estate cycle. The national apartment vacancy rate increased for the secondseventh consecutive quarter on a year-over-year basis and is now 4.9%, up slightly from 4.7%4.8% during fourth quarter 2015. (Year-over-year comparisons are necessary due to seasonal leasing patterns.)2016. At this point in the cycle, softening market conditions are not unexpected as markets digest new supply. Rentrent growth flatteneddecreased to 0.2% in 2016,-0.3% for 2017 as compared to 4.5%1.6% in 2015.2016. A few major markets such as Boston, Chicago, Houston, and New York had negative rent growth for the year, which brought down the overall national average. With completions finally peaking, CBRE-EA expects that the apartment market will generally stabilize, with demand supported by increasing household formation and steady job growth.
Market availability rates as reported by CBRE-EA were at or below the national average in three of the Account’s top five apartment markets. The vacancy rate of the Account’s multi-family properties ticked upincreased to average 7.5%6.5% in the fourth quarter of 20162017 as compared with 7.3%6.4% in the third quarter of 2016.quarter. As shown in the following table, the average vacancy rate of the Account’s properties was relatively stabledeclined in three of its five top markets. Both Denver and Los Angeles experienced significantNew York’s increases in vacancy. In Los Angeles, the increase is largely related to ongoing renovations at one of the Account’s properties located there. As leases expire, un-renovated units have been held back in order to upgrade. The uptick in vacancy at the Account’s Denver properties wasare primarily reflective of seasonal leasing patterns. The Account'sVacancy rates in Denver, Washington D.C., Los Angeles, and Fort Lauderdale properties are located in submarketscan be attributed to the high amount of higher end product competing directly with the Account’s assets that are experiencing an influx of new supply. Consequently, leasing conditions have been impacted and vacancy rates at the properties have become elevated.
yet to be absorbed.
| | | | | | | | | Account Units Weighted Average Vacancy | | Market Vacancy* | | | | Account Units Weighted Average Vacancy | | Market Vacancy* |
| Top 5 Apartment Metropolitan Areas | | Total Sector by Metro Area ($M) | | % of Total Investments | | 2016 Q4 | | 2016 Q3 | | 2016 Q4 | | 2016 Q3 | | Total Sector by Metro Area ($M) | | % of Total Investments | | 2017 Q4 | | 2017 Q3 | | 2017 Q4 | | 2017 Q3 |
| Account / Nation | | | | | | 7.5 | % | | 7.3 | % | | 4.9 | % | | 4.5 | % | | | | | | 6.5% | | 6.4% | | 4.9% | | 4.6% |
| New York-Jersey City-White Plains, NY-NJ | | $ | 864.8 |
| | 3.2 | % | | 5.5 | % | | 5.4 | % | | 3.5 | % | | 3.1 | % | | $ | 859.5 |
| | 3.2% | | 4.4% | | 3.1% | | 5.0% | | 3.3% |
| Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV | | 832.5 |
| | 3.1 | % | | 7.1 | % | | 7.2 | % | | 4.8 | % | | 4.5 | % | | 806.0 |
| | 3.0% | | 9.5% | | 8.2% | | 5.0% | | 4.7% |
| Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA | | 549.5 |
| | 2.1 | % | | 9.2 | % | | 7.6 | % | | 4.0 | % | | 4.0 | % | | 559.7 |
| | 2.1% | | 5.6% | | 6.2% | | 4.1% | | 3.8% |
| Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO | | 314.1 |
| | 1.2 | % | | 7.5 | % | | 5.6 | % | | 5.8 | % | | 5.1 | % | | 329.7 |
| | 1.2% | | 5.8% | | 7.7% | | 5.6% | | 4.9% |
| Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach, FL | | 301.4 |
| | 1.1 | % | | 9.4 | % | | 9.3 | % | | 5.2 | % | | 5.1 | % | | 295.7 |
| | 1.1% | | 8.1% | | 8.3% | | 5.7% | | 5.8% |
Market vacancy is the percentage of units vacant. The Account’s vacancy is the percentage of un-leasedunleased units.
Retail
Retail sales are driven by economic, demographic, and socio-economic factors. Retailers have been challenged by shifting demographicOverall, preliminary data from the U.S. Census Bureau indicated that retail sales excluding motor vehicles and shopping trends.parts has increased 5.7% in 2017 from 2016. The most recent quarter saw a 2.6% increase over third quarter 2017 sales. Sales growth during the fourth quarter was led by rising gasoline prices and the non-store retail segment, which suggests that e-commerce was likely a significant contributor. Overall, preliminary data from
Retailers have been increasingly challenged by shifting demographic and shopping trends. Negative news headlines continue to generalize about the U.S. Census Bureau indicated thatentire retail industry rather than its most vulnerable segments. As online retail sales excluding motor vehiclescontinue to push weak retailers out of business, surviving retailers are adjusting to consumer habits and parts increased 1.4% from third quarter 2016are altering their stores to foster e-commerce and 3.8% over fourth quarter 2015 sales. Retail market conditionsemphasize the customer experience. Additionally, landlords have begun adding new tenants and re-purposing their retail centers by adding medical offices, health clubs, gourmet grocery stores, and public spaces with regular community events. Management believes that the end result will be a set of financially healthier retailers and shopping centers that offer customers more compelling products and curated experiences. Ultimately, e-commerce will make retailers more efficient, but it will require substantial investment to create a seamless, interactive in-store experience that resonates with consumers.
The Account’s retail properties are high-quality assets that are well-leased and strategically-positioned in strong markets. The national availability rate remained steady duringessentially unchanged at 9.6% in the fourth quarter, when the national availability rate held at 10.2%.but saw an increase
from 9.0% in 2016. Favorable labor market conditions and rising wage growth bode well for consumer spending in 2017.2018. The vacancy rate for the Account’s retail portfolio declinedincreased to a very low 3.5% in4.7% for the fourth quarter as compared to 4.2%from 4.0% during the third quarter. All but two of the Account’s retail investments have aquarter; however, vacancy rate below 10.0% which is reflective of the overall high quality of the retail portfolio.rates in individual markets are substantially lower than their respective market rates.
Outlook
Financial market volatility increased early in 2016 over concerns about slowing global growth, the collapse in oil prices, and Britain’s decision to leave the European Union, but volatility to date has been short-lived and well-tolerated. There are no indications of the types of imbalances forming in the U.S. economy that have derailed previous expansions. The economic expansion is now entering its eighthninth year, making it one of the longest in U.S. history. The labor market isremains healthy recordingand growing. The unemployment rate has fallen to its lowest level in 17 years and the longest stretch of monthly job gainsconsensus predicts its average this year will drop to the lowest level in history; 15 million jobs have been added since late-2010.almost five decades. With the labor market approachingat full employment, wage growth has begun to pick up.up resulting in a rise of consumer confidence. Consumer spending remains healthy, holiday spending was the best in years, and consumer confidence stands at or near record levels. Export growth has accelerated from last year, helped by a weaker dollar and improved growth abroad. As demand from consumers and businesses has improved, growth in industrial production has accelerated and is now growing at its fastest pace in several years. Adding to the increased optimism was the passage of tax reform legislation in December 2017, with cuts in individual and corporate tax rates. Consequently, the U.S. economy appears well-positioned for continued growth. However, it is also important to recognize that the economic and political outlook is uncertain and risks are weighted to the downside.
Leading indicators of US commercial real estate performance, including labor market conditions, property market fundamentals, credit availability, and investor risk appetites remain positive. However, Treasury yields jumped following the election on expectations of stronger growth and higher long term inflation.steady. The FOMC raised the federal funds rate for the secondthird time in 2017 and the fifth time in the last decade and indicated the potential for three or four similar quarter-point hikes in 2017.2018. The recent increase in the ten-year Treasury likely limits the potential for additional cap rate compression. Instead, net operating incomereturns from appreciation. Income growth will be the primary driver of returns. There are good prospectsThe outlook for healthy rent growthreal estate fundamentals in the coming year are promising given expected GDP and employment growth and the supply/demand balance in most markets.
Despite the uncertainty, commercialCommercial real estate property markets are generally well-balanced nationally and a short-lived financial shock would likely be well tolerated. Economists expect GDP growth approaching 2.5% over the next two years2.7% in 2018, 2.4% for 2019 and for the labor marketunemployment rate to add two million jobs in 2017.drop further from the year-ending rate of 4.4%. Interest rates will rise, but should remain historically low. Inflationlow and inflation is still below the FOMC’s target rate. Consequently, real estate market conditions should remain healthy in 20172018 if domestic economic conditions approximate economisteconomists' expectations.
Account Overview and Outlook
The Account completed six investmentIn 2018, management intends to continue its focus on property management and leasing at its existing assets, while carefully evaluating acquisitions during the fourth quarter and disposed of two properties. Acquisitions included the Account’s first two student housing purchases, one serving San Diego State University and one serving the University of South Carolina. Other investments included the purchase of a 100% leased urban retail property located in a prime shopping district in Chicago, a 61.46% interest in an office building located in the Midtown South submarket of Manhattan, and a 45% interest in a life science building in San Diego. The Account also provided financing for the junior mezzanine position in a Class A office property located in Boston. The Account sold two office properties in the fourth quarter of 2016, one located in a southern California metro area, and another located in Chicago. The Account continues to pursue selectselected property types in target markets, with an emphasis on high-qualitymarkets. To supplement the Account’s high quality portfolio of core properties in prime locations where there is limited available opportunity for additional development. Management believes that a disciplined investment strategy, coupled with a focus on high-quality property in selected markets, can position the Account for favorable long-term performance, particularly given the advanced stage of the market cycle.
Management continued to emphasize active property management and leasing, while maintaining a strict adherence to expense management. The Account’s holdings were 92.1% leased during the fourth quarter as compared with 92.3% in the third quarter. The Account’s real estate assets generated a 2.09% total return during the fourth quarter of 2016. The real estate asset returns for the fourth quarter of 2016 were positive for the 27th consecutive quarter as shown in the graph below.
Management intends to continue to monitor the Account’s cash position to maintain adequate liquidity in order to fund participant payments, for operating expenses, capital expenditures for existing properties, and for additional property acquisitions. In addition to active investment activities,strong occupancy histories, management will carefullyalso evaluate opportunities to placepurchase assets where value can be enhanced by repositioning. Management will continue to evaluate opportunities to invest in commercial mortgage debt on select propertiesincluding conventional commercial mortgage loans, participating mortgage loans, secured mezzanine loans and refinance existing debt on assets at lower interest rates in order to further reduce the Account’s overall weighted cost of capital. commercial mortgage-backed securities.
A portion of the Account’s liquid investments areis held in publicly traded REITs. The Account’s portfolio consists of REIT stocks that closely replicateintended to approximate the NAREIT All Equity REIT index, thereby providing the Account with exposure to a diverse mix of property types and geographic markets. REITs provide liquidity and exposure to real estate, albeit with added volatility as compared to direct investments in commercial real estate property. Management will continue to monitor REIT valuation compared to direct property in order to manage the REIT allocation.
In early 2017, Management intends to focus on propertycontinue to monitor the Account’s cash position to maintain adequate liquidity in order to fund participant payments, for operating expenses, capital expenditures for existing properties, and for additional investments. In addition to active investment activities, management and leasing at its existing assets, whilewill carefully evaluating acquisitions in selected property types in target markets with an emphasis on institutional quality properties in prime locations with strong occupancy histories and favorable tenant rollover schedules. Management will also continue to evaluate opportunities to invest inplace commercial mortgage debt including conventional commercial mortgage loans, participating mortgage loans, secured mezzanine loanson select properties and commercial mortgage-backed securities.refinance existing debt on assets at lower interest rates in order to further reduce the Account’s overall weighted cost of capital. Management believes that a disciplined investment strategy in the current economic and real estate market environment will position the Account for favorable long-termlong term performance.
Investments as of December 31, 2016INVESTMENTS
As of December 31, 2016,2017, the Account had total net assets of $24.3$24.9 billion, a 8.7%2.6% increase from December 31, 2015.2016. The increase in the Account’s net assets was primarily due to net participant inflows into the Accountinvestment income and net appreciation in value of the Account’s investments.investments, partially offset by net participant outflows.
As of December 31, 2016,2017, the Account owned a total of 129138 real estate investments (110 of which 105 were wholly-owned, and 2428 of which were held in joint ventures.ventures). The real estate portfolio included 3839 office investments (including 1213 held in joint ventures), 3135 industrial investments (all wholly-owned)(including one held in a joint venture), 3638 apartment investments (including one held in a joint venture), 22 retail investments (including ten held in joint ventures), two storage facilities that are joint venture investments, one 75% owned joint venture interest in a portfolio of storage facilitiesland held for future development and one feeleasehold interest encumbered by a ground lease real estate investment.lease. Of the real estate investments, 33 are subject to debt (including 1314 joint venture investments).
The outstanding principal on mortgage loans payable on the Account’s wholly-owned real estate portfolio as of December 31, 20162017 was $2.3$2.2 billion. The Account’s proportionate share of outstanding principal on mortgage loans payable within its joint venture investments was $2.1$2.4 billion, which is netted against the underlying properties when determining the joint venture investments fair value presented on the consolidated schedulesConsolidated Schedules of investments.Investments. When the mortgage loans payable within the joint venture investments are considered, total outstanding principal on the Account’s portfolio as of December 31, 20162017 was $4.4$4.6 billion, which represented a loan-to-value ratio of 15.0%15.5%. The Account currently has no Account-level debt.
As of December 31, 2017, the Account held 79.5% of its total investments in real estate and real estate joint ventures. The Account also held investments in government agency notes representing 10.6% of total investments, real estate-related equity securities representing 4.6% of total investments, U.S. Treasury securities representing 3.7% of total investments, loans receivable representing 1.1% of total investments, and real estate limited partnerships representing 0.5% of total investments.
Management believes that the Account’s real estate portfolio is diversified by location and property type. The Account’s largest investment, Fashion Show Mall, located in Las Vegas, NV, represented 4.0%5.3% of total real estate investments and 3.1%4.3% of total investments. As discussed in the Account’s prospectus, theThe Account does not intend to buy and sell its real estate investments simply to make short-term profits. Rather, the Account’s general strategy in selling real estate investments is to dispose of those assets that management believes (i) have maximized in value, (ii) have underperformed or face deteriorating property-specific or market conditions, (iii) need significant capital infusions in the future, (iv) are appropriate to dispose of in order to remain consistent with the Account’s intent to diversify the Account by property type and geographic location (including reallocating the Account’s exposure to or away from certain property types in certain geographic locations), or (v) otherwise do not satisfy the investment objectives of the Account. Management, from time to time, will evaluate the need to manage liquidity in the Account as part of its analysis as to whether to undertake a particular asset sale. The Account couldmay reinvest any sale proceeds that it does not need to pay operating expenses or to meet debt service or redemption requests (e.g., participant withdrawals or benefit payments).
The following charts reflect the Account’s ten largest investments based on the fair values and the diversification of the Account's real estate assets by region and property type at December 31, 2017. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Property Investments Acquired in 2016 |
| (In millions) |
| Property Name | | Property Type | | City | | State | | Net Acquisition Cost (less closing costs and mortgage debt) |
| Wholly-Owned | | | | | | | | |
| Fort Point Portfolio | | Office | | Boston | | MA | | $ | 220.4 |
|
| BLVD63 | | Apartments | | San Diego | | CA | | 156.0 |
|
| 430 West 15th Street | | Office | | New York | | NY | | 108.4 |
|
| Greene Crossing | | Apartments | | Columbia | | SC | | 63.5 |
|
| Pinto Fallbrook I and II | | Industrial | | Houston | | TX | | 49.5 |
|
32 South State Street(1) | | Retail | | Chicago | | IL | | 20.8 |
|
| Total Wholly-Owned | | | | | | | | $ | 618.6 |
|
| Joint Ventures | | | | | | | | |
Fashion Show(2) | | Retail | | Las Vegas | | NV | | $ | 831.6 |
|
Campus Pointe 1(3) | | Office | | San Diego | | CA | | 137.7 |
|
Pacific City(4) | | Retail | | Huntington Beach | | CA | | 129.7 |
|
The Hub(5) | | Office | | Long Island City | | NY | | 55.2 |
|
817 Broadway(6) | | Office | | New York City | | NY | | 20.7 |
|
Campus Pointe 2(7) | | Office | | San Diego | | CA | | 31.3 |
|
| Total Joint Ventures | | | | | | | | $ | 1,206.2 |
|
| Total | | | | | | | | $ | 1,824.8 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Ten Largest Real Estate Investments |
| Property Investment Name | | Ownership Percentage | | City | | State | | Type | | Gross Real Estate Fair Value(1) | | Debt Fair Value(2) | | Net Real Estate Fair Value(3) | | Property as a
% of Total
Real Estate
Portfolio(4) | | Property as a
% of Total
Investments(5) |
| Fashion Show Mall | | 50% | | Las Vegas | | NV | | Retail | | $ | 1,263.1 |
| | $ | 426.9 |
| | $ | 836.2 |
| | 5.3% | | 4.3% |
| DDR | | 85% | | Various | | U.S.A. | | Retail | | 1,219.4 |
| | 596.1 |
| | 623.3 |
| | 5.1% | | 4.1% |
| The Florida Mall | | 50% | | Orlando | | FL | | Retail | | 925.5 |
| | 173.0 |
| | 752.5 |
| | 3.9% | | 3.1% |
| 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue | | 100% | | Washington | | D.C. | | Office | | 785.0 |
| | 328.6 |
| | 456.4 |
| | 3.3% | | 2.7% |
| Colorado Center | | 50% | | Santa Monica | | CA | | Office | | 588.6 |
| | 267.9 |
| | 320.7 |
| | 2.5% | | 2.0% |
| Fourth and Madison | | 100% | | Seattle | | WA | | Office | | 530.0 |
| | 199.8 |
| | 330.2 |
| | 2.2% | | 1.8% |
| 501 Boylston Street | | 100% | | Boston | | MA | | Office | | 505.2 |
| | 210.8 |
| | 294.4 |
| | 2.1% | | 1.7% |
| 99 High Street | | 100% | | Boston | | MA | | Office | | 502.1 |
| | — |
| | 502.1 |
| | 2.1% | | 1.7% |
| 425 Park Avenue | | 100% | | New York | | NY | | Ground Lease | | 457.0 |
| | — |
| | 457.0 |
| | 1.9% | | 1.5% |
| 780 Third Avenue | | 100% | | New York | | NY | | Office | | 427.0 |
| | 168.7 |
| | 258.3 |
| | 1.8% | | 1.4% |
| |
(1) | Concurrent withThe Account's share of the purchasefair value of thisthe property the Account assumed a $24.0 million mortgage loan.investment, gross of debt. |
| |
(2) | The Account acquired an initial 49% ownership interest in the joint venture, which has increased to 50% as of December 31, 2016, and assumed a $419.5 million mortgage loan (the Account's share). Net acquisition cost representsDebt fair values are presented at the Account's share.ownership interest. |
| |
(3) | The Account acquired a 45% ownership interest inAccount's share of the joint venture. Net acquisition cost representsfair value of the Account’s share.property investment, net of debt. |
| |
(4) | The Account acquiredTotal real estate portfolio is the aggregate fair value of the Account's wholly-owned properties and the properties held within a 70% ownership interest in the joint venture. Net acquisition cost represents the Account’s share.venture, gross of debt. |
| |
(5) | TheTotal investments are the aggregate fair value of all investments held by the Account, acquired a 95% ownership interestgross of debt. Total investments, as calculated within this table, will vary from total investments, as calculated in the Account's Schedule of Investments, as joint venture and assumed a $30.2 million mortgage loan (the Account's share). Net acquisition cost represents the Account's share. |
| |
(6)
| The Account acquired a 61.46% ownership interestinvestments are presented in the joint venture and assumed a $48.0 million mortgage loan (the Account's share)Schedule of Investments at their net equity position in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principals ("GAAP"). Net acquisition cost represents the Account's share. |
| |
(7)
| The Account acquired an initial 20% ownership interest in the joint venture, which will increase to a maximum of 45% as additional capital contributions are made. Net acquisition cost represents the Account’s share. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Property Investments Sold in 2016 |
| (In millions) |
| Property Name | | Property Type | | City | | State | | Net Sales Price (less selling expense) |
| Wholly-Owned | | | | | | | | |
| Residences at River's Edge | | Apartments | | Medford | | MA | | $ | 89.4 |
|
| Northpark Village Square | | Retail | | Valencia | | CA | | 57.6 |
|
| 3 Hutton Centre Drive | | Office | | Santa Ana | | CA | | 49.9 |
|
| Parkview Plaza | | Office | | Oakbrook Terrace | | IL | | 46.9 |
|
Northern CA RA Industrial Portfolio(1) | | Industrial | | Hayward | | CA | | 4.5 |
|
| Total Wholly-Owned | | | | | | | | $ | 248.3 |
|
| Joint Ventures | | | | | | | | |
Four Oaks Place(2) | | Office | | Houston | | TX | | $ | 0.5 |
|
| Total Joint Ventures | | | | | | | | $ | 0.5 |
|
| Total | | | | | | | | $ | 248.8 |
|
| |
(1)
| Partial sale of property held within this investment. |
| |
(2)
| The net sales price represents the Account's interest. |
The following charts reflect the diversification of the Account’s real estate assets by region and property type and list its ten largest investments based on the fair values at December 31, 2016.
| | Diversification by Fair Value(1) | Diversification by Fair Value(1) | Diversification by Fair Value(1) |
| | | West | | East | | South | | Midwest | | Total | | West | | East | | South | | Midwest | | Total |
| Office | | 16.6 | % | | 20.9 | % | | 5.7 | % | | — | % | | 43.2 | % | | 16.1 | % | | 20.2 | % | | 5.6 | % | | — | % | | 41.9 | % |
| Apartment | | 8.7 | % | | 8.6 | % | | 3.9 | % | | — | % | | 21.2 | % | | 8.4 | % | | 8.0 | % | | 3.6 | % | | 0.9 | % | | 20.9 | % |
| Retail | | 7.6 | % | | 3.1 | % | | 7.8 | % | | 0.5 | % | | 19.0 | % | | 8.1 | % | | 3.0 | % | | 7.6 | % | | 0.7 | % | | 19.4 | % |
| Industrial | | 7.6 | % | | 1.5 | % | | 3.9 | % | | 0.8 | % | | 13.8 | % | | 7.5 | % | | 2.0 | % | | 4.1 | % | | 0.8 | % | | 14.4 | % |
Other(2) | | 0.3 | % | | 2.4 | % | | 0.1 | % | | — | % | | 2.8 | % | | 0.6 | % | | 2.6 | % | | 0.1 | % | | 0.1 | % | | 3.4 | % |
| Total | | 40.8 | % | | 36.5 | % | | 21.4 | % | | 1.3 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 40.7 | % | | 35.8 | % | | 21.0 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 100.0 | % |
| |
(1) | Wholly-owned properties are represented at fair value and gross of any debt, while joint venture properties are represented at the net equity value. |
| |
(2) | Represents interestinterests in Storage Portfolio investment andinvestments, a fee interest encumbered by a ground lease real estate investment.investment and land. |
Properties in the “West” region are located in: AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NM, NV, OR, UT, WA, WY
Properties in the “East” region are located in: CT, DC, DE, KY, MA, MD, ME, NC, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, SC, VA, VT, WV
Properties in the “South” region are located in: AL, AR, FL, GA, LA, MS, OK, TN, TX
Properties in the “Midwest” region are located in: IA, IL, IN, KS, MI, MN, MO, ND, NE, OH, SD, WI
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Top Ten Largest Real Estate Investments |
| Property Investment Name | | City | | State | | Type | | Fair Value (in millions)(1) | | Property as a % of Total Real Estate Portfolio | | Property as a % of Total Investments |
| Fashion Show | | Las Vegas | | NV | | Retail | | $ | 839.1 |
| | (2) | | 4.0% | | 3.1% |
| 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue | | Washington | | D.C. | | Office | | 810.0 |
| | (3) | | 3.8% | | 3.0% |
| The Florida Mall | | Orlando | | FL | | Retail | | 755.8 |
| | (4) | | 3.6% | | 2.8% |
| Colorado Center | | Santa Monica | | CA | | Office | | 567.8 |
| | (5) | | 2.7% | | 2.1% |
| DDR | | Various | | USA | | Retail | | 552.8 |
| | (6) | | 2.6% | | 2.1% |
| Fourth and Madison | | Seattle | | WA | | Office | | 521.0 |
| | (7) | | 2.5% | | 2.0% |
| 99 High Street | | Boston | | MA | | Office | | 514.1 |
| | | | 2.4% | | 1.9% |
| 501 Boylston Street | | Boston | | MA | | Office | | 490.3 |
| | (8) | | 2.3% | | 1.8% |
| 425 Park Avenue | | New York | | NY | | Ground Lease | | 450.0 |
| | | | 2.1% | | 1.7% |
| Ontario Industrial Portfolio | | Ontario | | CA | | Industrial | | 438.0 |
| | | | 2.1% | | 1.6% |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property Investments Acquired in 2017 (in millions) |
| Property Name | | Ownership Percentage | | Property Type | | City | | State | | Net Acquisition Cost (less closing costs) | Mortgages Acquired |
| Wholly-Owned | | | | | | | | | | | |
| One Beeman Road | | 100.00% | | Industrial | | Northborough | | MA | | $ | 33.5 |
| $ | — |
|
| The Bridges | | 100.00% | | Apartments | | Minneapolis | | MN | | 60.9 |
| — |
|
| The Knoll | | 100.00% | | Apartments | | Minneapolis | | MN | | 32.5 |
| 17.7 |
|
| 803 Corday | | 100.00% | | Apartments | | Naperville | | IL | | 92.9 |
| — |
|
| Broward Industrial Portfolio | | 100.00% | | Industrial | | Various | | FL | | 54.1 |
| — |
|
| Orion on Orpington | | 100.00% | | Apartments | | Orlando | | FL | | 42.3 |
| — |
|
| Bridgepointe Shopping Center | | 100.00% | | Retail | | San Mateo | | CA | | 124.1 |
| — |
|
| Frontera Industrial Business Park | | 100.00% | | Industrial | | San Diego | | CA | | 56.0 |
| — |
|
| Allure at Camarillo | | 100.00% | | Apartments | | Camarillo | | CA | | 59.7 |
| — |
|
| Total Wholly-Owned | | | | | | | | | | $ | 556.0 |
| $ | 17.7 |
|
| Joint Ventures | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Commerce LIC | | 97.50% | | Industrial | | Long Island City | | NY | | $ | 54.3 |
| $ | — |
|
| DDR - Village Crossing Phase I | | 85.00% | | Retail | | Niles | | IL | | 44.4 |
| — |
|
| Storage Portfolio II | | 90.00% | | Storage | | Various | | U.S.A. | | 267.5 |
| 175.0 |
|
| 9625 Towne Centre Drive | | 35.86% | | Land | | San Diego | | CA | | 13.8 |
| — |
|
| Campus Pointe 3 | | 45.00% | | Land | | San Diego | | CA | | 13.0 |
| — |
|
| Campus Pointe 4 | | 45.00% | | Office | | San Diego | | CA | | 8.7 |
| — |
|
| Total Joint Ventures | | | | | | | | | | $ | 401.7 |
| $ | 175.0 |
|
| Total | | | | | | | | | | $ | 957.7 |
| $ | 192.7 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property Investments Sold in 2017 (in millions) |
| Property Name | | Ownership Percentage | | Property Type | | City | | State | | Net Sales Price (less selling expense) | | Mortgages Paid |
| Wholly-Owned | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Mazza Gallerie | | 100.00% | | Retail | | Washington | | D.C. | | $ | 74.3 |
| | $ | — |
|
Atlanta Industrial Portfolio(1) | | 100.00% | | Industrial | | McDonough | | GA | | 39.1 |
| | — |
|
Ontario Industrial Portfolio(1) | | 100.00% | | Industrial | | Various | | CA | | 66.0 |
| | — |
|
Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Portfolio(1) | | 100.00% | | Industrial | | Various | | CA | | 104.8 |
| | — |
|
| The Pepper Building | | 100.00% | | Apartments | | Philadelphia | | PA | | 51.7 |
| | — |
|
| Kierland Apartment Portfolio | | 100.00% | | Apartments | | Scottsdale | | AZ | | 147.1 |
| | — |
|
| The Caruth | | 100.00% | | Apartments | | Dallas | | TX | | 82.2 |
| | 45.0 |
|
| Total Wholly-Owned | | | | | | | | $ | 565.2 |
| | $ | 45.0 |
|
| Joint Ventures | | | | | | | | | | | | |
DDR - McFarland Plaza(2)(3) | | 85.00% | | Retail | | Tuscaloosa | | AL | | $ | 14.7 |
| | $ | 7.4 |
|
DDR - Costco Plaza(2)(3) | | 85.00% | | Retail | | White Marsh | | MD | | 11.0 |
| | 8.9 |
|
| Total Joint Ventures | | | | | | | | | | $ | 25.7 |
| | $ | 16.3 |
|
| Total | | | | | | | | | | $ | 590.9 |
| | $ | 61.3 |
|
| |
(1) | Fair value as reported in the December 31, 2016 Consolidated SchedulePartial sale of Investments. Investments owned 100% by the Account are reported based on fair value. Investments in joint ventures are reported at net equity value on a fair value basis, and are presented at the Account's ownership interest.property held within this investment. |
| |
(2) | Fashion Show is held in a joint venture with General Growth Properties, in whichThe net sales price represents the Account holds 50% interest, and is presented net of debt. As of December 31, 2016, this debt had a fair value of $433.0 million (the Account's share).interest. |
| |
(3) | 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue is presented gross of debt. The value ofRepresents assets sold and mortgages paid from within the Account's interest less the fair value of leverage is $478.9 million. |
| |
(4)
| The Florida Mall is held in aDDR joint venture with Simon Property Group, L.P., in which the Account holds a 50% interest, and is presented net of debt. As of December 31, 2016, this debt had a fair value of $180.6 million (the Account's share).investment. |
| |
(5)
| Colorado Center is held in a joint venture with EOP Operating LP, in which the Account holds a 50% interest. |
| |
(6)
| DDR Joint Venture, in which the Account holds an 85% interest, consists of 25 retail properties located in 11 states and is presented net of debt. As of December 31, 2016, this debt had a fair value of $648.6 million (the Account's share). |
| |
(7)
| Fourth and Madison is presented gross of debt. The value of the Account's interest less the fair value of leverage is $321.1 million. |
| |
(8)
| 501 Boylston Street is presented gross of debt. The value of the Account's interest less the fair value of leverage is $278.2 million. |
As of December 31, 2016, the Account held 79.1% of its total investments in real estate and real estate joint ventures. The Account also held investments in government agency notes representing 8.7% of total investments, U.S. Treasury securities representing 6.5% of total investments, real estate-related equity securities representing 4.1% of total investments, loans receivable representing 1.1% of total investments, and real estate limited partnerships representing 0.5% of total investments.
Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2017 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2016
Net Investment Income
The following table shows the results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and the dollar and percentage changes for those periods (dollars in millions).
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years Ended December 31, | | Change |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | $ | | % |
| INVESTMENT INCOME | | | | | | | | |
| Real estate income, net | | | | | | | | |
| Rental income | | $ | 1,059.6 |
| | $ | 1,009.0 |
| | $ | 50.6 |
| | 5.0 | % |
| Real estate property level expenses: | | | | | | | | |
| Operating expenses | | 221.2 |
| | 218.1 |
| | 3.1 |
| | 1.4 | % |
| Real estate taxes | | 166.7 |
| | 158.7 |
| | 8.0 |
| | 5.0 | % |
| Interest expense | | 89.7 |
| | 85.8 |
| | 3.9 |
| | 4.5 | % |
| Total real estate property level expenses | | 477.6 |
| | 462.6 |
| | 15.0 |
| | 3.2 | % |
| Real estate income, net | | 582.0 |
| | 546.4 |
| | 35.6 |
| | 6.5 | % |
| Income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships | | 214.1 |
| | 161.8 |
| | 52.3 |
| | 32.3 | % |
| Interest | | 54.1 |
| | 26.4 |
| | 27.7 |
| | 104.9 | % |
| Dividends | | 26.3 |
| | 32.5 |
| | (6.2 | ) | | (19.1 | )% |
| TOTAL INVESTMENT INCOME | | 876.5 |
| | 767.1 |
| | 109.4 |
| | 14.3 | % |
| Expenses | | | | | |
| |
|
| Investment management charges | | 72.0 |
| | 72.6 |
| | (0.6 | ) | | (0.8 | )% |
| Administrative charges | | 59.3 |
| | 62.1 |
| | (2.8 | ) | | (4.5 | )% |
| Distribution charges | | 25.7 |
| | 27.7 |
| | (2.0 | ) | | (7.2 | )% |
| Mortality and expense risk charges | | 1.2 |
| | 1.2 |
| | — |
| | — | % |
| Liquidity guarantee charges | | 47.0 |
| | 38.4 |
| | 8.6 |
| | 22.4 | % |
| TOTAL EXPENSES | | 205.2 |
| | 202.0 |
| | 3.2 |
| | 1.6 | % |
| INVESTMENT INCOME, NET | | $ | 671.3 |
| | $ | 565.1 |
| | $ | 106.2 |
| | 18.8 | % |
N/M—Not meaningful
The table below illustrates and compares rental income, operating expenses and real estate taxes for properties held by the Account for the entirety of each respective year, "same property," as compared to the comparative increases or decreases associated with the acquisition and disposition of properties throughout each respective year.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Rental Income | | Operating Expenses | | Real Estate Taxes |
| | | Change | | | | Change | | | | Change |
| 2017 | 2016 | $ | % | | 2017 | 2016 | $ | % | | 2017 | 2016 | $ | % |
| Same Property | | $ | 971.1 |
| $ | 947.1 |
| $ | 24.0 |
| 2.5 | % | | $ | 201.1 |
| $ | 199.5 |
| $ | 1.6 |
| 0.8 | % | | $ | 151.7 |
| $ | 147.3 |
| $ | 4.4 |
| 3.0 | % |
| Properties Acquired | | 70.3 |
| 21.6 |
| 48.7 |
| N/M |
| | 15.0 |
| 5.4 |
| 9.6 |
| N/M |
| | 12.5 |
| 6.0 |
| 6.5 |
| N/M |
|
| Properties Sold | | 18.2 |
| 40.3 |
| (22.1 | ) | N/M |
| | 5.1 |
| 13.2 |
| (8.1 | ) | N/M |
| | 2.5 |
| 5.4 |
| (2.9 | ) | N/M |
|
| Impact of Properties Acquired/Sold | | 88.5 |
| 61.9 |
| 26.6 |
| N/M |
| | 20.1 |
| 18.6 |
| 1.5 |
| N/M |
| | 15.0 |
| 11.4 |
| 3.6 |
| N/M |
|
| Total Property Portfolio | | $ | 1,059.6 |
| $ | 1,009.0 |
| $ | 50.6 |
| 5.0 | % | | $ | 221.2 |
| $ | 218.1 |
| $ | 3.1 |
| 1.4 | % | | $ | 166.7 |
| $ | 158.7 |
| $ | 8.0 |
| 5.0 | % |
Rental Income:
Rental income increased $50.6 million, or 5.0%, as a result of net acquisition activity and an increase in income generated by wholly-owned properties held for the duration of the last two years. The rise in same property income was driven by rising market rents and improving occupancy across most properties within the Account. The strongest increases were concentrated along the West Coast, within the apartment and industrial sectors.
Operating Expenses:
Operating expenses increased $3.1 million, or 1.4%, as a result of a modest increase in same property operating expenses paired with the impact of net acquisition activity. Of the $1.6 million same property increase, no single property type had a significant impact to the increase.
Real Estate Taxes:
Real estate taxes increased $8.0 million, or 5.0%, as a result of rising property tax assessments for properties held throughout 2017 and 2016, combined with the impact of net acquisition activity. The most significant property tax increases have been concentrated in the Boston and New York metro areas, primarily within the office sector.
Interest Expense:
Interest expense increased $3.9 million, or 4.5%, primarily due to higher average outstanding principal balances on mortgage loans payable.
Income from Real Estate Joint Ventures and Limited Partnerships:
Income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships increased $52.3 million, or 32.3%, related to net acquisition activity, primarily the acquisition of Fashion Show, which was acquired during the third quarter of 2016.
Interest and Dividend Income:
Interest income increased as a result of the Account’s higher average investment in loans receivable held throughout each respective year, while dividend income decreased proportionately with the Account's average REIT holdings.
Expenses:
Investment management, administrative and distribution charges are costs charged to the Account associated with managing the Account. Investment advisory charges are comprised primarily of fixed components, but fluctuate based on the size of the Account’s portfolio of investments, whereas administrative and distribution charges are comprised of more variable components that generally correspond with movements in net assets. These expenses decreased $5.4 million, or 3.3%, from the prior year primarily as result of general cost measures.
Mortality and expense risk and liquidity guarantee expenses are contractual charges to the Account from TIAA for TIAA’s assumption of these risks and provision of the liquidity guarantee. The rate for these charges is established annually; the current rates are effective May 1, 2017 through April 30, 2018, and are charged at a fixed rate based on the Account’s net assets. These expenses increased $8.6 million or 22.4% as a direct result of the increase in overall net assets of the Account from the previous year.
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses on Investments and Mortgage Loans Payable
The following table shows the net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments and mortgage loans payable for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and the dollar and percentage changes for those periods (dollars in millions).
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years Ended December 31, | | Change |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | $ | | % |
| NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS AND MORTGAGE LOANS PAYABLE | | | | | | | | |
| Net realized gain (loss) on investments: | | | | | | | | |
| Real estate properties | | $ | 42.0 |
| | $ | (6.2 | ) | | $ | 48.2 |
| | N/M |
|
| Real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships | | (21.9 | ) | | 0.6 |
| | (22.5 | ) | | N/M |
|
| Marketable securities | | 17.6 |
| | 25.6 |
| | (8.0 | ) | | (31.3 | )% |
| Total realized gain on investments: | | 37.7 |
| | 20.0 |
| | 17.7 |
| | 88.5 | % |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation on: | | | | | |
| |
|
| Real estate properties | | 135.5 |
| | 317.5 |
| | (182.0 | ) | | (57.3 | )% |
| Real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships | | 146.8 |
| | 236.9 |
| | (90.1 | ) | | (38.0 | )% |
| Marketable securities | | 50.0 |
| | 30.0 |
| | 20.0 |
| | 66.7 | % |
| Loans receivable | | 1.2 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 0.9 |
| | N/M |
|
| Mortgage loans payable | | 15.9 |
| | 15.1 |
| | 0.8 |
| | 5.3 | % |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments and mortgage loans payable | | 349.4 |
| | 599.8 |
| | (250.4 | ) | | (41.7 | )% |
| NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN ON INVESTMENTS AND MORTGAGE LOANS PAYABLE | | $ | 387.1 |
| | $ | 619.8 |
| | $ | (232.7 | ) | | (37.5 | )% |
Real Estate Properties, Joint Ventures and Limited Partnerships:
Net realized gains in the Account are primarily due to the sale of wholly-owned real estate property investments and marketable securities. See the Recent Transactions section herein for additional disclosure regarding the sale of the Account’s real estate property investments.
Real Estate Properties:
Wholly-owned real estate investments experienced net realized and unrealized gains of $177.5 million during 2017, compared to $311.3 million of net realized and unrealized gains during 2016. Appreciation slowed during 2017 but appreciation continued across most asset sectors held by the Account, primarily in the Industrial sector. Appreciation was most significant in the Western region of the country, primarily due to strong tenant demand for industrial space in California.
Real Estate Joint Ventures and Limited Partnerships:
Real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships experienced net realized and unrealized gains of $124.9 million during 2017, compared to net realized and unrealized gains of $237.5 million during 2016. While the rate of appreciation slowed during 2017, the Account continues to see continued appreciation across most asset sectors of the Account's joint venture portfolio. The strongest appreciation during 2017 was among the Account's office investments in the Western region. Conversely, appreciation from joint venture regional malls in the Southern region was especially strong in 2016, flattening during 2017, due to moderating market conditions.
Marketable Securities:
The Account’s marketable securities positions experienced net realized and unrealized gains of $67.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $55.6 million for 2016. The performance of the Account’s REIT portfolio was in line with the FTSE NAREIT All Equity REITs Index during the year-long period. The Account's real estate-related equity securities appreciated in line with the index. Additionally, as of December 31, 2017, the Account held $3.9 billion of investments in government agency notes and U.S. Treasury securities, which had nominal changes due to the short-term nature of these investments.
Mortgage Loans Payable:
Mortgage loans payable experienced unrealized gains of $15.9 million during 2017 compared to unrealized gains of $15.1 million during 2016. The unrealized gains in both periods were consistent with the directional movement of U.S. Treasury rates.
Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2015
Net Investment Income
The following table shows the results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 and the dollar and percentage changes for those periods (dollars in millions).
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years Ended December 31, | | Change |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | $ | | % |
| INVESTMENT INCOME | | | | | | | | |
| Real estate income, net | | | | | | | | |
| Rental income | | $ | 1,009.0 |
| | $ | 919.1 |
| | $ | 89.9 |
| | 9.8 | % |
| Real estate property level expenses: | | | | | | | | |
| Operating expenses | | 218.1 |
| | 207.4 |
| | 10.7 |
| | 5.2 | % |
| Real estate taxes | | 158.7 |
| | 144.4 |
| | 14.3 |
| | 9.9 | % |
| Interest expense | | 85.8 |
| | 81.1 |
| | 4.7 |
| | 5.8 | % |
| Total real estate property level expenses | | 462.6 |
| | 432.9 |
| | 29.7 |
| | 6.9 | % |
| Real estate income, net | | 546.4 |
| | 486.2 |
| | 60.2 |
| | 12.4 | % |
| Income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships | | 161.8 |
| | 140.1 |
| | 21.7 |
| | 15.5 | % |
| Interest | | 26.4 |
| | 10.1 |
| | 16.3 |
| | N/M |
|
| Dividends | | 32.5 |
| | 47.5 |
| | (15.0 | ) | | (31.6 | )% |
| TOTAL INVESTMENT INCOME | | 767.1 |
| | 683.9 |
| | 83.2 |
| | 12.2 | % |
| Expenses | | | | | | | | |
| Investment management charges | | 72.6 |
| | 69.3 |
| | 3.3 |
| | 4.8 | % |
| Administrative charges | | 62.1 |
| | 56.9 |
| | 5.2 |
| | 9.1 | % |
| Distribution charges | | 27.7 |
| | 23.9 |
| | 3.8 |
| | 15.9 | % |
| Mortality and expense risk charges | | 1.2 |
| | 1.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 9.1 | % |
| Liquidity guarantee charges | | 38.4 |
| | 31.7 |
| | 6.7 |
| | 21.1 | % |
| TOTAL EXPENSES | | 202.0 |
| | 182.9 |
| | 19.1 |
| | 10.4 | % |
| INVESTMENT INCOME, NET | | $ | 565.1 |
| | $ | 501.0 |
| | $ | 64.1 |
| | 12.8 | % |
N/M—Not meaningful
Rental Income:
Rental income increased $89.9 million, or 9.8%, as a result of net acquisition activity, increased occupancy and higher rental rates primarily in the Eastern office sector.
Operating Expenses:
Operating expenses increased $10.7 million, or 5.2%, primarily related to net acquisitions of real estate investments.
Real Estate Taxes:
Real estate taxes increased $14.3 million, or 9.9%. Increases were primarily associated with the net acquisitions of real estate investments. An additional factor to the increase was higher property tax assessments resulting from increases in values across the real estate portfolio, particularly in the Eastern and Western office sector.
Interest Expense:
Interest expense increased $4.7 million, or 5.8%, primarily due to a higher average outstanding principal balance on mortgage loans payable.
Income from Real Estate Joint Ventures and Limited Partnerships:
Income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships increased $21.7 million, or 15.5%, primarily related to net acquisition activity. The Account acquired over $1.1 billion in joint venture investments during the year.
Interest and Dividend Income:
Interest income increased as a result of the Account’s investment in loans receivable, while dividend income decreased proportionately with the Account's average REIT holdings.
Expenses:
The Account’s expenses increased $19.1 million, or 10.4%. Investment advisory, administrative and distribution charges are costs charged to the Account associated with managing the Account. Investment advisory charges are comprised primarily of fixed components, but fluctuate based on the size of the Account’s portfolio of investments, whereas administrative and distribution charges are comprised of more variable components that generally correspond with movements in net assets. Increases in expenses were primarily attributed to the increase in net assets. Other factors, such as higher allocated expenses related to the complexity of administering and distributing the Account, contributed to the increases. Investment advisory, administrative and distribution charges were, collectively, 0.69% and 0.71% of average net assets during 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Mortality and expense risk and liquidity guarantee charges are contractual charges to the Account from TIAA for TIAA’s assumption of these risks and provision of the guarantee.risks. The rate for these charges generally is established annually; the current rate is effective May 1, 2016 through April 30, 2017, and is charged based on the Account’s net assets.
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses on Investments and Mortgage Loans Payable
The following table shows the net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments and mortgage loans payable for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 and the dollar and percentage changes for those periods (dollars in millions).
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years Ended December 31, | | Change |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | $ | | % |
| NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS AND MORTGAGE LOANS PAYABLE | | | | | | | | |
| Net realized gain (loss) on investments: | | | | | | | | |
| Real estate properties | | $ | (6.2 | ) | | $ | 215.4 |
| | $ | (221.6 | ) | | N/M |
|
| Real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships | | 0.6 |
| | 167.3 |
| | (166.7 | ) | | (99.6 | )% |
| Marketable securities | | 25.6 |
| | 235.8 |
| | (210.2 | ) | | (89.1 | )% |
| Total realized gain on investments: | | 20.0 |
| | 618.5 |
| | (598.5 | ) | | (96.8 | )% |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: | | | | | | | | |
| Real estate properties | | 317.5 |
| | 487.2 |
| | (169.7 | ) | | (34.8 | )% |
| Real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships | | 236.9 |
| | 288.6 |
| | (51.7 | ) | | (17.9 | )% |
| Marketable securities | | 30.0 |
| | (255.1 | ) | | 285.1 |
| | N/M |
|
| Loans receivable | | 0.3 |
| | 0.6 |
| | (0.3 | ) | | (50.0 | )% |
| Mortgage loans payable | | 15.1 |
| | 5.6 |
| | 9.5 |
| | N/M |
|
| Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments and mortgage loans payable | | 599.8 |
| | 526.9 |
| | 72.9 |
| | 13.8 | % |
| NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN ON INVESTMENTS AND MORTGAGE LOANS PAYABLE | | $ | 619.8 |
| | $ | 1,145.4 |
| | $ | (525.6 | ) | | (45.9 | )% |
Real Estate Properties, Joint Ventures and Limited Partnerships:
Net realized gains in the Account are primarily due to the sale of wholly-owned real estate property investments. See the Recent Transactions section herein for additional disclosure regarding the sale of the Account’s real estate property investments.
Real Estate Properties:
The Account’s wholly-owned real estate investments experienced net realized and unrealized gains of $311.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $702.6 million of net realized and unrealized gains for 2015. The resulting $391.3 million decrease, when compared to the prior year, was primarily driven by market stabilizations across the sectors.
Real Estate Joint Ventures and Limited Partnerships:
The Account’s real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships experienced net realized and unrealized gains of $237.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to net realized and unrealized gains of $455.9 million for 2015. The resulting $218.4 million net decrease, when compared to the previous year, was driven by market stabilizations across the sectors.
Marketable Securities:
The Account’s marketable securities positions experienced net realized and unrealized gains of $55.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to net realized and unrealized losses of $19.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. During 2016, the markets for REITs increased in the U.S. as measured by the FTSE NAREIT All Equity REITs Index; the Account’s real estate related equity securities were in line with these market movements.
Additionally, the Account maintains a portfolio of government agency notes and U.S. Treasury securities which had nominal changes due to the short term nature of these investments.
Mortgage Loans Payable:
Mortgage loans payable experienced unrealized gains of $15.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to unrealized gains of $5.6 million for 2015. The unrealized gains in both periods were consistent with the directional movement of U.S. Treasury rates.
Year Ended December 31, 2015 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2014
Net Investment Income
The table below shows the results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 and the dollar and percentage changes for those periods (dollars in millions).
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years Ended December 31, | | Change |
| 2015 | | 2014 | | $ | | % |
| INVESTMENT INCOME | | | | | | | | |
| Real estate income, net | | | | | | | | |
| Rental income | | $ | 919.1 |
| | $ | 897.8 |
| | $ | 21.3 |
| | 2.4 | % |
| Real estate property level expenses and taxes: | | | | | | | | |
| Operating expenses | | 207.4 |
| | 208.0 |
| | (0.6 | ) | | (0.3 | )% |
| Real estate taxes | | 144.4 |
| | 134.1 |
| | 10.3 |
| | 7.7 | % |
| Interest expense | | 81.1 |
| | 98.7 |
| | (17.6 | ) | | (17.8 | )% |
| Total real estate property level expenses and taxes. | | 432.9 |
| | 440.8 |
| | (7.9 | ) | | (1.8 | )% |
| Real estate income, net | | 486.2 |
| | 457.0 |
| | 29.2 |
| | 6.4 | % |
| Income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships | | 140.1 |
| | 148.1 |
| | (8.0 | ) | | (5.4 | )% |
| Interest | | 10.1 |
| | 2.8 |
| | 7.3 |
| | N/M |
|
| Dividends | | 47.5 |
| | 44.9 |
| | 2.6 |
| | 5.8 | % |
| TOTAL INVESTMENT INCOME | | 683.9 |
| | 652.8 |
| | 31.1 |
| | 4.8 | % |
| Expenses | | | | | |
| |
|
| Investment management charges | | 69.3 |
| | 70.7 |
| | (1.4 | ) | | (2.0 | )% |
| Administrative charges | | 56.9 |
| | 44.9 |
| | 12.0 |
| | 26.7 | % |
| Distribution charges | | 23.9 |
| | 17.3 |
| | 6.6 |
| | 38.2 | % |
| Mortality and expense risk charges | | 1.1 |
| | 0.9 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 22.2 | % |
| Liquidity guarantee charges | | 31.7 |
| | 29.2 |
| | 2.5 |
| | 8.6 | % |
| TOTAL EXPENSES | | 182.9 |
| | 163.0 |
| | 19.9 |
| | 12.2 | % |
| INVESTMENT INCOME, NET | | $ | 501.0 |
| | $ | 489.8 |
| | $ | 11.2 |
| | 2.3 | % |
N/M—Not meaningful
Rental Income:
Rental income increased $21.3 million, or 2.4%, as a result of higher occupancy and rental rates primarily in the industrial, apartment and office sectors.
Operating Expenses:
Operating expenses decreased $0.6 million, or 0.3%, primarily related to net dispositions of real estate investments, offset by increases in repair and maintenance expense and leasing expenses in the apartment sector, due to increased occupancy.
Real Estate Taxes:
Real estate taxes increased $10.3 million, or 7.7%, due to higher property tax assessments resulting from increases in values across the real estate portfolio, particularly in the Eastern retail sector, as well as office and industrial sectors throughout various regions. Additional increases were associated with the net acquisitions of real estate investments.
Interest Expense:
Interest expense decreased $17.6 million, or 17.8%, primarily due to the payoff of mortgage loans, as well as the refinance of an existing mortgage loan, reducing the overall average interest rate of the Account’s mortgage loans payable.
Income from Real Estate Joint Ventures and Limited Partnerships:
Income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships decreased $8.0 million, or 5.4%, due to several dispositions during the year, partially offset by increased rents at Miami International Mall and the Storage Portfolio.
Interest and Dividend Income:
Interest income increased as a result of Account’s investment in a loan receivable, while dividend income increased proportionately with the Account’s increased holdings of marketable securities.
Expenses:
The Account’s expenses increased $19.9 million or 12.2%. Investment advisory, administrative and distribution charges are costs charged to the Account associated with managing the Account. Investment advisory charges are comprised primarily of fixed components, whereas administrative and distribution charges are comprised of more variable components that generally correspond with movements in net assets. Approximately half of the increases in administrative and distribution expenses were attributed to the increase in net assets. Other factors, such as higher allocated expenses related to the complexity of administering and distributing the Account, contributed to the remainder of the increase. Investment advisory, administrative and distribution charges were, collectively, 0.71% and 0.73% of average net assets during 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Mortality and expense risk and liquidity guarantee charges are contractual charges to the Account from TIAA for TIAA’s assumption of these risks and provision of the guarantee. The rate for these charges generally is established annually; the current rate is effective April 24, 2015 through April 30, 2016, and is charged based on the Account’s net assets.
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses on Investments and Mortgage Loans Payable
The following table shows the net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments and mortgage loans payable for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 and the dollar and percentage changes for those periods (dollars in millions).
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years Ended December 31, | | Change |
| 2015 | | 2014 | | $ | | % |
| NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS AND MORTGAGE LOANS PAYABLE | | | | | | | | |
| Net realized gain (loss) on investments: | | | | | | | | |
| Real estate properties | | $ | 215.4 |
| | $ | 69.0 |
| | $ | 146.4 |
| | N/M |
|
| Real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships | | 167.3 |
| | (34.7 | ) | | 202.0 |
| | N/M |
|
| Marketable securities | | 235.8 |
| | 65.4 |
| | 170.4 |
| | N/M |
|
| Total realized gain (loss) on investments: | | 618.5 |
| | 99.7 |
| | 518.8 |
| | N/M |
|
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: | | | | | | | | |
| Real estate properties | | 487.2 |
| | 918.8 |
| | (431.6 | ) | | (47.0 | )% |
| Real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships | | 288.6 |
| | 372.0 |
| | (83.4 | ) | | (22.4 | )% |
| Marketable securities | | (255.1 | ) | | 302.8 |
| | (557.9 | ) | | N/M |
|
| Loan Receivable | | 0.6 |
| | — |
| | 0.6 |
| | N/M |
|
| Mortgage loans payable | | 5.6 |
| | (64.9 | ) | | 70.5 |
| | N/M |
|
| Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments and mortgage loans payable | | 526.9 |
| | 1,528.7 |
| | (1,001.8 | ) | | (65.5 | )% |
| NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN ON INVESTMENTS AND MORTGAGE LOANS PAYABLE | | $ | 1,145.4 |
| | $ | 1,628.4 |
| | $ | (483.0 | ) | | (29.7 | )% |
N/M—Not meaningfulReal Estate Properties, Joint Ventures and Limited Partnerships:
Net realized gains in the Account are primarily due to the sale of wholly-owned real estate property investments and real estate property investments underlying the Account’s joint venture investments. See the Recent Transactions section herein for additional disclosure regarding the sale of the Account’s real estate property investments.
Real Estate Properties:
The Account’s wholly-owned real estate investments experienced net realized and unrealized gains of $702.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to $987.8 million of net realized and unrealized gains for 2014. The resulting $285.2 million decrease, when compared to the prior year, was primarily driven by market stabilizations across the sectors.
Real Estate Joint Ventures and Limited Partnerships:
The Account’s real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships experienced net realized and unrealized gains of $455.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to net realized and unrealized gains of $337.3 million for 2014. The resulting $118.6 million net increase, when compared to the previous year, was driven by an increase in valuation, most notably in the office and retail sectors.
Marketable Securities:
The Account’s marketable securities positions experienced net realized and unrealized losses of $19.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to net realized and unrealized gains of $368.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. During 2015, the markets for REITs decreased in the U.S. as measured by the FTSE NAREIT All Equity REITs Index; the Account’s real estate related equity securities align with these market movements.
Additionally, the Account had $4.2 billion invested in government agency notes and U.S. Treasury Securities at December 31, 2015, which had nominal changes due to the short term nature of these investments.
Mortgage Loans Payable:
Mortgage loans payable experienced unrealized gains of $5.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to unrealized losses of $64.9 million for 2014. The increase in unrealized gains as compared to the previous year can be attributed to a reduction in US Treasury rates, offset by higher mortgage yields.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, the Account’s cash and cash equivalents and non-real estate-related marketable securities had a value of $3.9 billion and $4.1 billion, respectively (15.6% and $4.2 billion, respectively (16.7% and 18.9%16.7% of the Account’s net assets at such dates, respectively).
Participant Flows: Year Ended December 31, 20162017 compared to Year Ended December 31, 20152016
During the years ended December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, the Account receivedhad $420.5 million of net outflows and $759.8 million and $884.6 million of net inflows from participants, respectively.
Liquidity Guarantee
Primarily as a result of significant net participant transfers out of the Account during late 2008 and mid-2009, pursuant to TIAA’s existing liquidity guarantee obligation, the TIAA General Account purchased $1.2 billion of liquidity units issued by the Account in a number of separate transactions between December 2008 and June 2009. Subsequent to June 2009, the TIAA General Account did not purchase any additional liquidity units. In accordance with this liquidity guarantee obligation, TIAA guarantees that all participants in the Account may redeem their accumulation units at their accumulation unit value next determined after their transfer or cash withdrawal request is received in good order. The Account pays TIAA for the risk associated with providing the liquidity guarantee through a daily deduction from the Account’s net assets.
Management cannot predict whether any future TIAA liquidity unit purchases will be required under this liquidity guarantee. If net outflows were to occur (even if not at the same intensity as in 2008 and early 2009), it could have a negative impact on the Account’s operations and returns and could require TIAA to purchase additional liquidity units, perhaps to a significant degree, as was the case in late 2008 and early 2009.
TIAA’s obligation to provide Account participants liquidity through purchases of liquidity units is not subject to an express regulatory or contractual limitation, although as described in the following paragraph, the independent fiduciary may (but is not obligated to) require the reduction of TIAA’s interest through sales of assets from the Account if TIAA’s interest exceeds the trigger point. Even if the independent fiduciary so requires TIAA’s obligation to provide liquidity under the guarantee, which is required by the New York State Department of Financial Services, will continue. Management believes that TIAA has the ability to meet its obligations under this liquidity guarantee.
Whenever TIAA owns liquidity units, the duties of the Account’s independent fiduciary, as part of its monitoring of the Account, include reviewing the purchase and redemption of liquidity units by TIAA to ensure the Account uses the correct accumulation unit values. In addition, the independent fiduciary’s responsibilities include:
establishing the percentage of total accumulation units that TIAA’s ownership should not exceed (the “trigger point”) and creating a method for reviewing the trigger point;
approving any adjustment of TIAA’s ownership interest in the Account and, in its discretion, requiring an adjustment if TIAA’s ownership of liquidity units reaches the trigger point; and
once the trigger point has been reached, participating in any program to reduce TIAA’s ownership in the Account by utilizing cash flow or liquid investments in the Account, or by utilizing the proceeds from asset sales. If the independent fiduciary were to determine that TIAA’s ownership should be reduced following the trigger point, its role in participating in any asset sales program would include (i) participating in the selection of properties for sale, (ii) providing sales guidelines and (iii) approving those sales if, in the independent fiduciary’s opinion, such sales are desirable to reduce TIAA’s ownership of liquidity units.
In establishing the appropriate trigger point, including whether or not to require certain actions once the trigger point has been reached, the independent fiduciary will assess, among other things and to the extent consistent with the Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE 96-76) issued by the U.S. Department of Labor in 1996 with respect to the
liquidity guarantee and the independent fiduciary’s duties under ERISA, the risk that a conflict of interest could arise due to the level of TIAA’s ownership interest in the Account.
Redemption of Liquidity Units. The independent fiduciary is vested with oversight and approval over any redemption of TIAA’s liquidity units, acting in the best interests of Real Estate Account participants.
As of March 31, 2013, the independent fiduciary completed the systematic redemption of all of the liquidity units held by the TIAA General Account. Approximately one-quarter of such units were redeemed evenly over the business days in each of the months of June, September, and December 2012, and March 2013, representing a total of $1.3 billion redeemed during this period.
As a general matter, the independent fiduciary may authorize or direct the redemption of all or a portion of liquidity units at any time and TIAA will request the approval of the independent fiduciary before any liquidity units are redeemed. Upon termination and liquidation of the Account (wind-up), any liquidity units held by TIAA will be the last units redeemed, unless the independent fiduciary directs otherwise.
Net Income and Marketable Securities
Net investment income continues to be an additional source of liquidity for the Account. Net investment income was $565.1$671.3 million for the year ended December 31, 20162017 as compared to $501.0$565.1 million during 2015.2016. Total net investment income increased as described more fully in the Results of Operations section.
As of December 31, 2016,2017, cash and cash equivalents, along with real estate-related and non-real estate-related marketable securities comprised 21.1%20.6% of the Account’s net assets. The Account’s real estate-related marketable securities primarily consist of publicly traded REITs. The Account’s liquid assets continue to be available to purchase suitable real estate properties, meet the Account’s debt obligations, expense needs, and participant redemption requests (i.e., participant withdrawals or benefit payments).
Leverage
The Account may borrow money and assume or obtain a mortgage on a property to make leveraged real estate investments. Also, to meet any short-term cash needs, the Account may obtain a line of credit that may be unsecured and/or contain terms that may require the Account to secure the loan with one or more of its properties.
The Account is authorized to borrow money in accordance with its investment guidelines. Under the Account’s current investment guidelines, the Account’s loan-to-value ratio (as described below) is to be maintained at or below 30%. Such incurrences of debt from time to time may include:
placing new debt on properties;
refinancing outstanding debt;
assuming debt on acquired properties or interests in the Account’s properties; and/or
extending the maturity date of outstanding debt.debt; and/or
an unsecured line of credit or credit facility.
In calculating this limit, only the Account’s actual percentage interest in any borrowings is included, and not that percentage interest held by any joint venture partner. Further, the Account may only borrow up to 70% of the then-current value of a property, although construction loans may be for 100% of the costs incurred in developing a property. As of December 31, 2016, one construction loan was held within the Account’s joint venture investment Four Oaks Place, L.P. At the time the Account (or a joint venture in which the Account is a partner) enters into a revolving line of credit, for the purpose of calculating the loan-to-value ratio, management deems the maximum amount which may be drawn under that line of credit as fully incurred, regardless of whether the maximum amount available has been drawn from time to time.includes only amounts outstanding when calculating outstanding indebtedness.
As of December 31, 2016,2017, the Account’s ratio of outstanding principal amount of debt (inclusive of the Account’s proportionate share of debt held within its joint venture investments) to total gross asset value (i.e., a “loan-to-value ratio”) was 15.0%15.5%. The Account intends to maintain its loan-to-value ratio at or below 30% (this ratio is measured at the time of incurrence and after giving effect thereto). The Account’s total gross asset value, for these purposes, is equal to the total fair value of the Account’s assets (including the fair value of the Account’s net equity interest in joint ventures), with no reduction associated with any indebtedness on such assets.
As of December 31, 2016, $50.8 million in principal amount of2017, there are no mortgage obligations secured by real estate investments wholly-owned by the Account are obligated to be paid throughout 2017.maturing within the next twelve months. The Account currently has sufficient liquidity in the form of cash and cash equivalents and short term securities to meet its current mortgage obligations.
In times of high net inflow activity, in particular during times of high net participant transfer inflows, management may determine to apply a portion of such cash flows to make prepayments of indebtedness prior to scheduled maturity, which would have the effect of reducing the Account’s loan-to-value ratio.
Recent Transactions
The following describes property transactions by the Account during the fourth quarter of 2016.2017. Except as noted, the expenses for operating the properties purchased are either borne or reimbursed, in whole or in part, by the property tenants, although the terms vary under each lease.
Purchases
Greene Crossing—Columbia, SCOn October 4, 2016, the Account acquired a student housing complex located near the University of South Carolina for $63.5 million. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Property Name | | Purchase Date | | Ownership Percentage | | Sector | | Location | | Net Purchase Price (1) |
| Bridgepointe Shopping Center | | 11/10/2017 | | 100.00% | | Retail | | San Mateo, CA | | $ | 124.1 |
|
| Frontera Industrial Business Park | | 11/16/2017 | | 100.00% | | Industrial | | San Diego, CA | | 56.0 |
|
| Allure at Camarillo | | 11/30/2017 | | 100.00% | | Apartments | | Camarillo, CA | | 59.7 |
|
Storage Portfolio II (2)(3) | | 11/30/2017 | | 90.00% | | Storage | | Various, U.S.A. | | 267.5 |
|
| 9625 Towne Centre Drive | | 12/19/2017 | | 35.86% | | Land | | San Diego, CA | | 13.8 |
|
| Campus Pointe 3 | | 12/19/2017 | | 45.00% | | Land | | San Diego, CA | | 13.0 |
|
| Campus Pointe 4 | | 12/28/2017 | | 45.00% | | Office | | San Diego, CA | | 8.7 |
|
Fashion Show—Las Vegas, NV
On October 4, 2016, the Account purchased an additional 1% interest in a joint investment which holds a retail property located in Las Vegas, Nevada for $16.6 million, which is net of an additional $8.4 million mortgage loan obligation associated with the additional ownership interest, as further discussed in the Financing section.
BLVD63—San Diego, CA
On November 1, 2016, the Account purchased a student housing complex located near San Diego State University for $156.0 million.
32 South State Street—Chicago, IL
On November 9, 2016, the Account purchased a retail property located in Chicago, Illinois for $20.8 million, which is net of a $24.0 million mortgage loan the Account assumed concurrent with the purchase, as further discussed in the Financings section.
817 Broadway—New York City, NY
On November 21, 2016, the Account purchased a 61.46% interest in a joint venture investment which holds an office property located in New York City, New York for $20.7 million. The Account's gross interest in the property is $68.7 million, encumbered by a $48.0 million mortgage loan (the Account's share), as further discussed in the Financings section.
Campus Pointe 1—San Diego, CA
On December 15, 2016, the Account purchased a 45% interest in a joint venture investment which holds an office property located in San Diego, California for $137.7 million (the Account's share). | |
(1) | The net purchase price represents the purchase price, less closing costs. |
| |
(2) | The Account purchased 36 storage properties located in various locations throughout the U.S. |
| |
(3) | Concurrent with the purchase of this property, the Account acquired a $175.0 million mortgage loan (the Account's share), as further discussed in the Financings section. |
Sales
Parkview Plaza—Oakbrook Terrace, ILOn October 20, 2016 the Account sold an office property located in Oakbrook Terrance, Illinois for a net sales price of $46.9 million, realizing a loss of $27.9 million from the sale, the majority of which has been previously recognized as unrealized losses in the Account's consolidated statements of operations. The Account's cost basis in the property at the date of sale was $74.8 million. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Property Name | | Sales Date | | Ownership Percentage | | Sector | | Location | | Net Sales Price (1) | Realized Gain (Loss) on Sale(2) |
| Kierland Apartment Portfolio | | 10/27/2017 | | 100.00% | | Apartments | | Scottsdale, AZ | | $ | 147.1 |
| $ | (27.2 | ) |
The Caruth (3) | | 11/13/2017 | | 100.00% | | Apartments | | Dallas, TX | | 82.2 |
| 10.8 |
|
DDR - Costco Plaza (4) | | 12/21/2017 | | 85.00% | | Retail | | White Marsh, MD | | 11.0 |
| (12.3 | ) |
| |
(1) | The net sales price represents the sales price, less selling expenses. |
| |
(2) | Majority of the realized gain/loss has been previously recognized as unrealized gains/losses in the Account's Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
| |
(3) | Concurrent with the sale of this property, the Purchaser assumed $45.0 million in outstanding mortgage debt, as shown in the Financings section. |
| |
(4) | Concurrent with the sale of this property, the Account extinguished $8.9 million in outstanding mortgage debt, as shown in the Financings section. |
Financings
3 Hutton Centre Drive—Santa Ana, CAOn November 15, 2016, the Account sold an office property located in Santa Ana, California for a net sales price of $49.9 million, realizing a loss of $4.7 million from the sale, the majority of which has been previously recognized as unrealized losses in the Account's consolidated statements of operations. The Account's cost basis in the property at the date of sale was $54.6 million. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Property Name | | Financing Date | | Ownership Percentage | | Sector | | Location | | Financing Amount(1) |
| The Caruth | | 11/13/2017 | | 100.00% | | Apartments | | Dallas, TX | | $ | (45.0 | ) |
Storage Portfolio II (2) | | 11/30/2017 | | 90.00% | | Storage | | Various, U.S.A. | | 175.0 |
|
DDR - Costco Plaza | | 12/21/2017 | | 85.00% | | Retail | | White Marsh, MD | | (8.9 | ) |
| |
(1) | Positive values represent new mortgage loans incurred during the period (or mortgage loans assumed by the Account through property acquisition). Negative values represent mortgage loan payoffs (or mortgage loans assigned to a buyer upon disposition). |
| |
(2) | This loan has an interest rate of 4.175%, and matures on December 1, 2027. |
Loans Receivable
State Street Financial Center—Boston, MA
On November 17, 2016, the Account entered into a $125.0 million mezzanine loan receivable position secured by Borrower's ownership interest in State Street Financial Center. The loan has an interest rate of 6.50% and is interest only through maturity. The loan matures on November 10, 2021.
Financings
Fashion Show—Las Vegas, NV
On October 4, 2016, the Account increased its ownership in the Fashion Show Holding I, LLC joint venture investment by 1%, resulting in an $8.4 million increase of the Account's share of the mortgage obligation.
32 South State Street—Chicago, IL
On November 9, 2016, concurrent with the purchase of an retail property located in Chicago, Illinois, the Account assumed a $24.0 million mortgage loan. The loan has an interest rate of 4.48% and matures on June 6, 2025.
817 Broadway—New York City, NY
On November 21, 2016, 817 Broadway Owner, LLC joint venture investment, in which the Account holds a 61.46% interest, assumed a $48.0 million mortgage loan (the Account's share). The loan is interest only, with an interest rate of 4.65%, maturing on December 1, 2019.
DDR Joint Venture—Various, USA
On December 1, 2016, the Account's DDR joint venture investment, in which the Account holds an 85% interest, restructured its $176.9 million term loan (the Account's share) collateralized by six properties, effectively reducing the principal balance to $148.5 million. The loan has an annual interest rate of 2% plus one month LIBOR, matures on November 30, 2019 and had two one-year extension options.
Contractual Obligations(1)
The following table sets forth a summary regarding the Account’s known contractual obligations, including required interest payments for those items that are interest bearing, as of December 31, 20162017 (amounts in millions):
| | | | | Amounts Due During Years Ending December 31, | | Amounts Due During Years Ending December 31, |
| 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2021 | | Thereafter | | Total | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | Thereafter | | Total |
| Mortgage Loans Payable: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Principal Payments | | $ | 50.8 |
| | $ | 13.8 |
| | $ | 107.4 |
| | $ | 156.2 |
| | $ | 125.9 |
| | $ | 1,862.4 |
| | $ | 2,316.5 |
| | $ | 13.7 |
| | $ | 107.2 |
| | $ | 171.7 |
| | $ | 125.0 |
| | $ | 335.7 |
| | $ | 1,485.3 |
| | $ | 2,238.6 |
|
Interest Payments(1)(2) | | 89.5 |
| | 87.7 |
| | 86.4 |
| | 81.3 |
| | 73.1 |
| | 214.4 |
| | 632.4 |
| | 86.7 |
| | 85.4 |
| | 80.3 |
| | 71.5 |
| | 62.3 |
| | 150.7 |
| | 536.9 |
|
| Total Mortgage Loans Payable | | $ | 140.3 |
| | $ | 101.5 |
| | $ | 193.8 |
| | $ | 237.5 |
| | $ | 199.0 |
| | $ | 2,076.8 |
| | $ | 2,948.9 |
| | $ | 100.4 |
| | $ | 192.6 |
| | $ | 252.0 |
| | $ | 196.5 |
| | $ | 398.0 |
| | $ | 1,636.0 |
| | $ | 2,775.5 |
|
Other Commitments(2)(3) | | 39.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 39.0 |
| | 32.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 32.0 |
|
Tenant improvements(3)(4) | | 38.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 38.8 |
| | 47.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 47.6 |
|
| Total Contractual Obligations | | $ | 218.1 |
| | $ | 101.5 |
| | $ | 193.8 |
| | $ | 237.5 |
| | $ | 199.0 |
| | $ | 2,076.8 |
| | $ | 3,026.7 |
| | $ | 180.0 |
| | $ | 192.6 |
| | $ | 252.0 |
| | $ | 196.5 |
| | $ | 398.0 |
| | $ | 1,636.0 |
| | $ | 2,855.1 |
|
| |
(1) | The contractual obligations do not include payments on debt held in joint ventures, which are the obligation of the individual joint venture entities. |
| |
(2) | These amounts represent interest payments due on mortgage loans payable based on the stated rates at December 31, 2016.2017. |
| |
(2)(3)
| This includes the Account’s commitment to purchase interest in its limited partnerships, which could be called by the partner at any time. |
| |
(3)(4)
| This amount represents tenant improvements and leasing inducements committed by the Account as of December 31, 2016.2017. |
The contractual obligations do not include payments on debt held in joint ventures, which are the obligation of the individual joint venture entities.
Effects of Inflation and Increasing Operating Expenses
Inflation, along with increased insurance, taxes, utilities and security costs, may increase property operating expenses in the future. Any such increases in operating expenses are generally billed to tenants either through contractual lease provisions in office, industrial, and retail properties or through rent increases in apartment complexes. The Account remains responsible for the expenses for unleased space in a property as well as expenses which may not be reimbursed under the terms of an existing lease.
Critical Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statementsManagement’s discussion and analysis of the Account are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United StatesAccount’s financial condition and results of America.
In preparingoperations is based on the Account’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared by management is requiredin accordance with GAAP. The preparation of the Account’s financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and judgmentsassumptions that affect the reported amountsfinancial statements and disclosures. Some of assets, liabilities, revenues,these estimates and expenses.assumptions require application of difficult, subjective, and/or complex judgments about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and that may change in subsequent periods. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believedit believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying valuevalues of assets and liabilities of the Account that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Determination of Investments at Fair Value: The Account reports all investments and investment related mortgage loans payable at fair value. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) has defined fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used to determine the fair value of the Account’s investments and investment related mortgage payables.
Valuation of Real Estate Properties—Investments in real estate properties are stated at fair value, as determined in accordance with policies and procedures reviewed by the Investment Committee of the Board and in accordance with the responsibilities of the Board as a whole. Accordingly, the Account does not record depreciation. Determination of fair value involves judgment because the actual fair value of real estate can be determined only by negotiation between the parties in a sales transaction. The Account’s primary objective when valuing its real estate investments will be to produce a valuation that represents a reasonable estimate of the fair value of its investments. Implicit in the Account’s definition of fair value are the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby:
Buyer and seller are typically motivated;
Both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their best interests;
A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market;
Payment is made in terms of cash or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and
The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale.
Property and investment values are affected by, among other things, the availability of capital, occupancy rates, rental rates, and interest and inflation rates. As a result, determining real estate and investment values involves many assumptions. Key inputs and assumptions include rental income and expense amounts, related rental income and expense growth rates, capital expenditures, discount rates and capitalization rates. Valuation techniques include discounted cash flow analysis, prevailing market capitalization rates or multiples applied to earnings from the property, analysis of recent comparable sales transactions, actual sale negotiations and bona fide purchase offers received from third parties. Amounts ultimately realized from each investment may vary significantly from the fair value presented.
Real estate properties owned by the Account are initially valued based on an independent third party appraisal, as reviewed by TIAA’s internal appraisal staff and as applicable the Account’s independent fiduciary at the time of the closing of the purchase, which may result in a potential unrealized gain or loss reflecting the difference between an investment’s fair value (i.e., exit price) and its cost basis (which is inclusive of transaction costs).
Subsequently, each property is appraised each quarter by an independent third party appraiser, reviewed by TIAA’s internal appraisal staff and as applicable the Account’s independent fiduciary. In general, the Account obtains appraisals
of its real estate properties spread out throughout the quarter, which is intended to result in appraisal adjustments, and thus, adjustments to the valuations of its holdings (to the extent such adjustments are made) that happen regularly throughout each quarter and not on one specific day or month in each period.
Further, management reserves the right to order an appraisal and/or conduct another valuation outside of the normal quarterly process when facts or circumstances at a specific property change. For example, under certain circumstances a valuation adjustment could be made when the account receives a bona fide bid for the sale of a property held within the Account or one of the Account’s joint ventures. In addition, adjustments may be made for events or circumstances indicating an impairment of a tenant’s ability to pay amounts due to the Account under a lease (including due to a bankruptcy filing of that tenant). Alternatively, adjustments may be made to reflect the execution or renewal of a significant lease. Also, adjustments may be made to reflect factors (such as sales values for comparable properties or local employment rate) bearing uniquely on a particular region in which the Account holds properties. TIAA’s internal appraisal staff oversees the entire appraisal process, in conjunction with the Account’s independent fiduciary (the independent fiduciary is more fully described in the paragraph below). Any differences in the conclusions of TIAA’s internal appraisal staff and the independent appraiser will be reviewed by the independent fiduciary, which will make a final determination on the matter (which may include ordering a subsequent independent appraisal).
The independent fiduciary, RERC, has been appointed by a special subcommittee of the Investment Committee of the Board to, among other things, oversee the appraisal process. The independent fiduciary must approve all independent appraisers used by the Account. All appraisals are performed in accordance with Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practices, the real estate appraisal industry standards created by The Appraisal Foundation. Real estate appraisals are estimates of property values based on a professional’s opinion. Appraisals of properties held outside of the U.S. are performed in accordance with industry standards commonly applied in the applicable jurisdiction. These independent appraisers are always expected to be MAI-designated members of the Appraisal Institute (or its European equivalent, Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors) and state certified appraisers from national or regional firms with relevant property type experience and market knowledge. Under the Account’s current procedures, each independent appraisal firm will be rotated off of a particular property at least every three years, although such appraisal firm may perform appraisals of other Account properties subsequent to such rotation.
Also, the independent fiduciary can require additional appraisals if factors or events have occurred that could materially change a property’s value (including those identified above) and such change is not reflected in the quarterly valuation review, or otherwise to ensure that the Account is valued appropriately. The independent fiduciary must also approve any valuation change of real estate-related assets where a property’s value changed by more than 6% from the most recent independent annual appraisal, or if the value of the Account would change by more than 4% within any calendar quarter or more than 2% since the prior calendar month. When a real estate property is subject to a mortgage, the property is valued independently of the mortgage and the property and mortgage fair values are reported separately (see Valuation of Mortgage Loans Payable). The independent fiduciary reviews and approves all mortgage valuation adjustments before such adjustments are recorded by the Account. The Account continues to use the revised value for each real estate property and mortgage loan payable to calculate the Account’s daily net asset value until the next valuation review or appraisal.
Valuation of Real Estate Joint Ventures—Real estate joint ventures are stated at the fair value of the Account’s ownership interests of the underlying entities. The Account’s ownership interests are valued based on the fair value of the underlying real estate, any related mortgage loans payable, and other factors, such as ownership percentage, ownership rights, buy/sell agreements, distribution provisions and capital call obligations. Upon the disposition of all real estate investments by an investee entity, the Account will continue to state its equity in the remaining net assets of the investee entity during the wind down period, if any, at fair value until the dissolution of the investee entity.
Valuation of Real Estate Limited Partnerships—Limited partnership interests are stated at the fair value of the Account’s ownership in the partnership which are recorded based upon the changes in the net asset values of the limited partnerships as determined from the financial statements of the limited partnerships when received by the Account. Prior to the receipt of the financial statements from the limited partnerships, the Account estimates the value of its interest in good faith and will from time to time seek input from the issuer or the sponsor of the investments. Since market quotations
are not readily available, the limited partnership interests are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by
management under the direction of the Investment Committee of the Board and in accordance with the responsibilities of the Board as a whole.
Valuation of Marketable Securities—Equity securities listed or traded on any national market or exchange are valued at the last sale price as of the close of the principal securities market or exchange on which such securities are traded or, if there is no sale, at the mean of the last bid and asked prices on such market or exchange, exclusive of transaction costs.
Debt securities with readily available market quotations, other than money market instruments, are generally valued at the most recent bid price or the equivalent quoted yield for such securities (or those of comparable maturity, quality and type). Debt securities, for which market quotations are not readily available, are valued at their fair value as determined in good faith by the Investment Committee of the Board and in accordance with the responsibilities of the Board as a whole.
Short-term investments are valued in the same manner as debt securities, as described above.
Money market instruments are valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.
Equity and fixed income securities traded on a foreign exchange or in foreign markets are valued using their closing values under the valuation methods generally accepted in the country where traded, as of the valuation date. This value is converted to U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect on the valuation day. Under certain circumstances (for example, if there are significant movements in the United States markets and there is an expectation the securities traded on foreign markets will adjust based on such movements when the foreign markets open the next day), the Account may adjust the value of equity or fixed income securities that trade on a foreign exchange or market after the foreign exchange or market has closed.
Valuation of Loans Receivable (i.e., the Account as a creditor)—Loans receivable are stated at fair value and are initially valued at the face amount of the loan funding. Subsequently, loans receivable are valued at least quarterly by TIAA’s internal valuation department based on market factors, such as market interest rates and spreads for comparable loans, the liquidity for loans of similar characteristics, the performance of the underlying collateral (such as the loan-to-value ratio and the cash flow of the underlying collateral) and the credit quality of the counterparty. The independent fiduciary reviews and approves all loan receivable valuations adjustments before such adjustments are recorded by the Account. The Account continues to use the revised value for each loan receivable to calculate the Account’s daily net asset value until the next valuation review. Loan origination costs are expensed as incurred.
Valuation of Mortgage Loans Payable (i.e., the Account as a debtor)—Loans payable are stated at fair value. The estimated fair value of loans payable are based on the amount at which the liability could be transferred to a third party exclusive of transaction costs. Loans payable are valued internally by TIAA’s internal appraisal department and reviewed by the Account’s independent fiduciary, at least quarterly based on market factors, such as market interest rates and spreads for comparable loans, the performance of the underlying collateral (such as the loan-to-value ratio and the cash flow of the underlying collateral), the liquidity for loans of similar characteristics, the maturity date of the loan, the return demands of the market.
Foreign currency transactions and translation: Portfolio investments and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates prevailing at the end of the period. Purchases and sales of securities, income receipts and expense payments made in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates prevailing on the respective dates of the transactions. The effect of any changes in foreign currency exchange rates on portfolio investments and mortgage loans payable are included in net realized and unrealized gains and losses on real estate properties and mortgage loans payable. Net realized gains and losses on foreign currency transactions include disposition of foreign currencies, and currency gains and losses between the accrual and receipt dates of portfolio investment income and between the trade and settlement dates of portfolio investment transactions.
Accumulation and Annuity Funds: The accumulation fund represents the net assets attributable to participants in the accumulation phase of their investment (“Accumulation Fund”). The annuity fund represents the net assets attributable to the participants currently receiving annuity payments (“Annuity Fund”). The net increase or decrease
in net assets from investment operations is apportioned between the accounts based upon their relative daily net asset
values. Once an Account participant begins receiving lifetime annuity income benefits, payment levels cannot be reduced as a result of the Account’s adverse mortality experience. In addition, the contracts pursuant to which the Account is offered are required to stipulate the maximum expense charge for all Account level expenses that can be assessed, which is not to exceed 2.5% of average net assets per year. The Account pays a fee to TIAA to assume mortality and expense risks.
Accounting for Investments: The investments held by the Account are accounted for as follows:
Real Estate Properties��—Rent from real estate properties consists of all amounts earned under tenant operating leases, including base rent, recoveries of real estate taxes and other expenses and charges for miscellaneous services provided to tenants. Rental income is recognized in accordance with the billing terms of the lease agreements. The Account bears the direct expenses of the real estate properties owned. These expenses include, but are not limited to, fees to local property management companies, property taxes, utilities, maintenance, repairs, insurance, and other operating and administrative costs. An estimate of the net operating income earned from each real estate property is accrued by the Account on a daily basis and such estimates are adjusted when actual operating results are determined.
Real Estate Joint Ventures—The Account has limited ownership interests in various real estate joint ventures (collectively, the “joint ventures”). The Account records its contributions as increases to its investments in the joint ventures, and distributions from the joint ventures are treated as income within income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships in the Account’s consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operations.Operations. Distributions that are identified as returns of capital are recorded as a reduction to the cost basis of the investment, whereas distributions identified as capital gains or losses are recorded as realized gains or losses. Income from the joint ventures is recorded based on the Account’s proportional interest of the income distributed by the joint ventures. Income earned by the joint ventures, but not yet distributed to the Account by the joint ventures is recorded as unrealized gains and losses.
Limited Partnerships—The Account has limited ownership interests in various private real estate funds (primarily limited partnerships) and a private real estate investment trust (collectively, the “limited partnerships”). The Account records its contributions as increases to the investments, and distributions from the investments are treated as income within income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships in the Account’s consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operations.Operations. Distributions that are identified as returns of capital are recorded as a reduction to the cost basis of the investment, whereas distributions identified as capital gains or losses are recorded as realized gains or losses. Unrealized gains and losses are recorded based upon the changes in the net asset values of the limited partnerships as determined from the financial statements of the limited partnerships when received by the Account. Prior to the receipt of the financial statements from the limited partnerships, the Account estimates the value of its interest in good faith and will from time to time seek input from the issuer or the sponsor of the investment. Changes in value based on such estimates are recorded by the Account as unrealized gains and losses.
Marketable Securities—Transactions in marketable securities are accounted for as of the date the securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Interest income is recorded as earned. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date within dividend income. Dividends that are identified as returns of capital are recorded as a reduction to the cost basis of the investment, whereas dividends identified as capital gains or losses are recorded as realized gains or losses. Realized gains and losses on securities transactions are accounted for on the specific identification method.
Loans Receivable—Loans receivable are stated at fair value and are initially valued at the face amount of the loan funding. Subsequently, loans receivable are valued at least quarterly by TIAA’s internal valuation department with changes in fair value flowing through unrealized gain (loss). Interest income from loans receivable is recognized using the effective interest method over the expected life of the loan. All loans receivable held to date were originated directly by the Account.
Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses—Unrealized gains and losses are recorded as the fair values of the Account’s investments are adjusted, and as discussed within the Real Estate Joint Ventures and Limited Partnerships sections above. Realized gains and losses are recorded at the time an investment is sold or a distribution is received from the joint ventures or limited partnerships. Real estate transactions are accounted for as of the date on which the purchase or sale transactions for the real estate properties close (settlement date). The Account recognizes a realized gain on the
sale of a real estate property to the extent that the contract sales price exceeds the cost-to-date of the property being sold. A realized loss occurs when the cost-to-date exceeds the sales price.
Net Assets—The Account’s net assets as of the close of each valuation day are valued by taking the sum of:
the value of the Account’s cash, cash equivalents, and short-term and other debt instruments;
the value of the Account’s other securities and other non-real estate assets;
the value of the individual real properties (based on the most recent valuation of that property) and other real estate-related investments owned by the Account;
an estimate of the net operating income accrued by the Account from its properties, other real estate-related investments and non-real estate-related investments (including short-term marketable securities) since the end of the prior valuation day; and
actual net operating income earned from the Account’s properties, other real estate-related investments and non-real estate-related investments (but only to the extent any such item of income differs from the estimated income accrued for on such investments),
and then reducing the sum by liabilities held within the Account, including the daily investment management fee, administration and distribution fees and certain other expenses attributable to operating the Account.
After the end of every quarter, the Account reconciles the amount of expenses deducted from the Account (which is established in order to approximate the costs that the Account will incur) with the expenses the Account actually incurred. If there is a difference, the Account adds it to or deducts it from the Account in equal daily installments over the remaining days of the following quarter. Material differences may be repaid in the current calendar quarter. The Account’s at-cost deductions are based on projections of Account assets and overall expenses, and the size of any adjusting payments will be directly affected by the difference between management’s projections and the Account’s actual assets or expenses.
Federal Income Taxes: Based on provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, Section 817, the Account is taxed as a segregated asset account of TIAA and as such, the Account should incur no material federal income tax attributable to the net investment activity of the Account.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) was signed into law on December 22, 2017. The Act changes existing United States tax law and includes numerous provisions that will affect businesses. The Act reduces the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, includes several base broadening provisions, as well as, reform to the U.S. international tax system.
The Act does not result in any material impact to the Account.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
The Account’s real estate holdings, including real estate joint ventures, limited partnerships and loans receivable, which, as of December 31, 2016,2017, represented 80.7%81.1% of the Account’s total investments, expose the Account to a variety of risks. These risks include, but are not limited to:
General Real Estate Risk—The risk that the Account’s property values or rental and occupancy rates could go down due to general economic conditions, a weak market for real estate generally, disruptions in the credit and/or capital markets, or changing supply and demand for certain types of properties;
Appraisal Risk—The risk that the sale price of an Account property (i.e., the value that would be determined by negotiations between independent parties) might differ substantially from its estimated or appraised value, leading to losses or reduced profits to the Account upon sale;
Risk Relating to Property Sales—The risk that the Account might not be able to sell a property at a particular time for its full value, particularly in a poor market. This might make it difficult to raise cash quickly and also could lead to Account losses;
Risks of Borrowing—The risk that interest rate changes may impact Account returns if the Account takes out a mortgage on a property, buys a property subject to a mortgage or holds a property subject to a mortgage, and hedging against such interest rate changes, if undertaken by the Account, may entail additional costs and be unsuccessful; and
Foreign Currency Risk—The risk that the value of the Account’s foreign investments, related debt, or rental income could increase or decrease due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates or foreign currency exchange control regulations, and hedging against such currency changes, if undertaken by the Account, may entail additional costs and be unsuccessful.
The Account believes the diversification of its real estate portfolio, both geographically and by sector, along with its quarterly valuation procedure, helps manage the real estate and appraisal risks described above.
As of December 31, 2016, 19.3%2017, 18.9% of the Account’s total investments were comprised of marketable securities. Marketable securities include high-quality debt instruments (i.e., government agency notes) and REIT securities. The consolidated statementAccount's Consolidated Statements of investments for the AccountInvestments sets forth the general financial terms of these instruments, along with their fair values, as determined in accordance with procedures described earlier in Critical Accounting Policies section above and in Note 1–Organization and Significant Accounting Policies to the Account’s consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements included herewith. As of the date of this report, the Account does not invest in derivative financial investments, nor does the Account engage in any hedging activity, although it may do so in selected circumstances in the future.
Risks associated with investments in real estate-related liquid assets (which could include, from time to time, REIT securities and CMBS), and non-real estate-related liquid assets, including financial/credit risk, market volatility risk, interest rate volatility risk and deposit/money market risk.
Financial/Credit Risk—The risk, for debt securities, that the issuer will not be able to pay principal and interest when due (and/or declare bankruptcy or be subject to receivership) and, for equity securities such as common or preferred stock, that the issuer’s current earnings will fall or that its overall financial soundness will decline, reducing the security’s value.
Market Volatility Risk—The risk that the Account’s investments will experience price volatility due to changing conditions in the financial markets regardless of the credit quality or financial condition of the underlying issuer. This risk is particularly acute to the extent the Account holds equity securities, which have experienced significant short-term price volatility over the past year. Also, to the extent the Account holds debt securities, changes in overall interest rates can cause price fluctuations.
Interest Rate Volatility—The risk that interest rate volatility may affect the Account’s current income from an investment.
Deposit/Money Market Risk—The risk that, to the extent the Account’s cash held in bank deposit accounts exceeds federally insured limits as to that bank, the Account could experience losses if banks fail. The Account does not believe it has exposure to significant concentration of deposit risk. In addition, there is some risk that investments held in money market accounts can suffer losses.
In addition, to the extent the Account were to hold mortgage-backed securities (including commercial mortgage-backed securities) these securities are subject to prepayment risk or extension risk (i.e., the risk that borrowers will repay the loans earlier or later than anticipated). If the underlying mortgage assets experience faster than anticipated repayments of principal, the Account could fail to recoup some or all of its initial investment in these securities, since the original price paid by the Account was based in part on assumptions regarding the receipt of interest payments. If the underlying mortgage assets are repaid later than anticipated, the Account could lose the opportunity to reinvest the anticipated cash flows at a time when interest rates might be rising. The rate of prepayment depends on a variety of geographic, social and other functions, including prevailing market interest rates and general economic factors. The fair value of these securities is also highly sensitive to changes in interest rates. Note that the potential for appreciation, which could otherwise be expected to result from a decline in interest rates, may be limited by any increased prepayments. These securities may be harder to sell than other securities.
In addition to these risks, real estate equity securities (such as REIT stocks and mortgage-backed securities) would be subject to many of the same general risks inherent in real estate investing, making mortgage loans and investing in debt securities. For more information on the risks associated with all of the Account’s investments, see Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in this Form 10-K.
ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY
To the Participants of the TIAA Real Estate Account:
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the TIAA Real Estate Account (“Account”) of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (“TIAA”) are the responsibility of TIAA’s management. They have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and have been presented fairly and objectively in accordance with such principles.
TIAA has established and maintains an effective system of internal controls over financial reporting designed to provide reasonable assurance that assets are properly safeguarded, that transactions are properly executed in accordance with management’s authorization, and to carry out the ongoing responsibilities of management for reliable consolidated financial statements. In addition, TIAA’s internal audit personnel provide regular reviews and assessments of the internal controls and operations of the Account, and the Senior Managing Director, Chief Auditor of Internal Audit regularly reports to the Audit Committee of the TIAA Board of Trustees.
The independent registered public accounting firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 2015 and 2014.2015. The independent auditors’auditors report expresses an independent opinion on the fairness of presentation of the Account’s consolidated financial statements.
The Audit Committee of the TIAA Board of Trustees, comprised entirely of independent, non-management trustees, meets regularly with management, representatives of the independent registered public accounting firm and internal audit group personnel to review matters relating to financial reporting, internal controls and auditing. In addition to the annual independent audit of the Account’s consolidated financial statements, the New York State Insurance Department and other state insurance departments regularly examine the operations and consolidated financial statements of the Account as part of their periodic corporate examinations.
|
| |
March 20, 201715, 2018 | /s/ Carol W. Deckbar |
| | Carol W. Deckbar Executive Vice President, Institutional Investment & Endowment Services, Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (Principal Executive Officer) |
| | |
| | /s/ Virginia M. Wilson |
| | Virginia M. Wilson Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (Principal Financial Officer) |
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
To the Participants of the TIAA Real Estate Account:
The TIAA Audit Committee (“Committee”) oversees the financial reporting process of the TIAA Real Estate Account (“Account”) on behalf of TIAA’s Board of Trustees. The Committee operates in accordance with a formal written charter (copies of which are available upon request) which describes the Audit Committee’s responsibilities. All members of the Committee are independent, as defined under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.
Management has the primary responsibility for the Account’s consolidated financial statements,Consolidated Financial Statements, development and maintenance of a strong system of internal controls and disclosure controls, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Committee reviewed and approved the audit plans of the internal audit group and the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with their respective audits of the Account. The Committee also meets regularly with the internal audit group and the independent registered public accounting firm, both with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluation of internal controls, and the overall quality of financial reporting. As required by its charter, the Committee will formally evaluate rotation of the independent registered public accounting firm whenever circumstances warrant, but in no event will the evaluation be less frequent than every ten years of the engagement.
The Committee reviewed and discussed the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements with management, including a discussion of the quality and appropriateness of the accounting principles and financial reporting practices followed, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity and completeness of disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The Committee has also discussed the audited consolidated financial statements with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of these audited consolidated financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The discussion with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP focused on their judgments concerning the quality and appropriateness of the accounting principles and financial reporting practices followed by the Account, the clarity and completeness of the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, and other significant matters, such as any significant changes in accounting policies, internal controls, management judgments and estimates, and the nature of any uncertainties or unusual transactions. In addition, the Committee discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the auditors’ independence from management and the Account, and has received a written disclosure regarding such independence, as required by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Committee has approved the release of the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements for publication and filing with appropriate regulatory authorities.
Jeffrey
James R. Brown,Chambers, Audit Committee Chair
JamesJeffrey R. Chambers,Brown, Audit Committee Member
Lisa W. Hess, Audit Committee Member
Lawrence H. Linden, Audit Committee Member
Maureen O’Hara, Audit Committee Member
Donald K. Peterson, Audit Committee Member
Dorothy K. Robinson, Audit Committee Member
March 20, 201715, 2018
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
(In millions, except per accumulation unit amounts)
| | | | | December 31, | | December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| ASSETS | | | | | | | | | |
| Investments, at fair value: | | | | | | | | | |
Real estate properties (cost: $12,818.1 and $12,289.0) | | $ | 15,452.8 |
| | $ | 14,606.2 |
| |
Real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships (cost: $4,530.4 and $3,171.4) | | 5,759.9 |
| | 4,213.2 |
| |
Real estate properties
(cost: $12,972.5 and $12,818.1) | | | $ | 15,742.7 |
| | $ | 15,452.8 |
| |
Real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships
(cost: $4,675.3 and $4,530.4) | | | 6,003.0 |
| | 5,759.9 |
| |
| Marketable securities: | | | | | | | | | |
Real estate related (cost: $883.9 and $859.5) | | 1,081.5 |
| (1) | 1,024.4 |
| |
Other (cost: $4,054.0 and $4,207.7) | | 4,053.8 |
| | 4,207.2 |
| |
Loans receivable (cost: $294.8 and $100.0) | | 295.7 |
| | 100.6 |
| |
Total investments (cost: $22,581.2 and $20,627.6) | | 26,643.7 |
| | 24,151.6 |
| |
Real estate related
(cost: $991.0 and $883.9) | | | 1,238.0 |
| (1) | | 1,081.5 |
| (1) |
Other
(cost: $3,888.1 and $4,054.0) | | | 3,887.5 |
| | 4,053.8 |
| |
Loans receivable
(cost: $296.7 and $294.8) | | | 298.8 |
| | 295.7 |
| |
Total investments
(cost: $22,823.6 and $22,581.2) | | | 27,170.0 |
| | | 26,643.7 |
| |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | 3.0 |
| | 11.9 |
| | 11.7 |
| | 3.0 |
| |
| Due from investment manager | | 5.9 |
| | 5.7 |
| | 1.0 |
| | 5.9 |
| |
| Other | | 332.6 |
| (2) | 230.2 |
| | 270.9 |
| (2) | | 332.6 |
| (2) |
| TOTAL ASSETS | | 26,985.2 |
| | 24,399.4 |
| | 27,453.6 |
| | | 26,985.2 |
| |
| LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | |
| Mortgage loans payable, at fair value | | | | | | | | | |
| (principal outstanding: $2,316.5 and $1,763.7) | | 2,332.1 |
| | 1,794.4 |
| |
| (principal outstanding: $2,238.6 and $2,316.5) | | | 2,238.3 |
| | 2,332.1 |
| |
| Accrued real estate property expenses | | 202.2 |
| | 191.5 |
| | 199.1 |
| | 202.2 |
| |
| Payable for collateral for securities loaned | | 93.0 |
| | — |
| | 18.5 |
| | 93.0 |
| |
| Other | | 53.2 |
| | 53.5 |
| | 55.1 |
| | | 53.2 |
| |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES | | 2,680.5 |
| | 2,039.4 |
| | 2,511.0 |
| | | 2,680.5 |
| |
| COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| NET ASSETS | | | | | | | | | |
| Accumulation Fund | | 23,813.5 |
| | 21,898.6 |
| | 24,430.8 |
| | 23,813.5 |
| |
| Annuity Fund | | 491.2 |
| | 461.4 |
| | 511.8 |
| | | 491.2 |
| |
| TOTAL NET ASSETS | | $ | 24,304.7 |
| | $ | 22,360.0 |
| | $ | 24,942.6 |
| | | $ | 24,304.7 |
| |
| NUMBER OF ACCUMULATION UNITS OUTSTANDING | | 62.4 |
| | 60.4 |
| | 61.3 |
| | | 62.4 |
| |
| NET ASSET VALUE, PER ACCUMULATION UNIT | | $ | 381.636 |
| | $ | 362.773 |
| | $ | 398.329 |
| | | $ | 381.636 |
| |
(1) Includes securities loaned of $18.1 million at December 31, 2017 and $91.2 million.million at December 31, 2016.
(2) Includes cash collateral for securities loaned of $18.5 million at December 31, 2017 and $93.0 million.million at December 31, 2016.
See notes to the consolidated financial statements
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In millions)
| | | | | Years Ended December 31, | | Years Ended December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| INVESTMENT INCOME | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Real estate income, net | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Rental income | | $ | 1,009.0 |
| | $ | 919.1 |
| | $ | 897.8 |
| | $ | 1,059.6 |
| | $ | 1,009.0 |
| | $ | 919.1 |
|
| Real estate property level expenses and taxes: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating expenses | | 218.1 |
| | 207.4 |
| | 208.0 |
| | 221.2 |
| | 218.1 |
| | 207.4 |
|
| Real estate taxes | | 158.7 |
| | 144.4 |
| | 134.1 |
| | 166.7 |
| | 158.7 |
| | 144.4 |
|
| Interest expense | | 85.8 |
| | 81.1 |
| | 98.7 |
| | 89.7 |
| | 85.8 |
| | 81.1 |
|
| Total real estate property level expenses and taxes | | 462.6 |
| | 432.9 |
| | 440.8 |
| | 477.6 |
| | 462.6 |
| | 432.9 |
|
| Real estate income, net | | 546.4 |
| | 486.2 |
| | 457.0 |
| | 582.0 |
| | 546.4 |
| | 486.2 |
|
| Income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships | | 161.8 |
| | 140.1 |
| | 148.1 |
| | 214.1 |
| | 161.8 |
| | 140.1 |
|
| Interest | | 26.4 |
| | 10.1 |
| | 2.8 |
| | 54.1 |
| | 26.4 |
| | 10.1 |
|
| Dividends | | 32.5 |
| | 47.5 |
| | 44.9 |
| | 26.3 |
| | 32.5 |
| | 47.5 |
|
| TOTAL INVESTMENT INCOME | | 767.1 |
| | 683.9 |
| | 652.8 |
| | 876.5 |
| | 767.1 |
| | 683.9 |
|
| Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Investment management charges | | 72.6 |
| | 69.3 |
| | 70.7 |
| | 72.0 |
| | 72.6 |
| | 69.3 |
|
| Administrative charges | | 62.1 |
| | 56.9 |
| | 44.9 |
| | 59.3 |
| | 62.1 |
| | 56.9 |
|
| Distribution charges | | 27.7 |
| | 23.9 |
| | 17.3 |
| | 25.7 |
| | 27.7 |
| | 23.9 |
|
| Mortality and expense risk charges | | 1.2 |
| | 1.1 |
| | 0.9 |
| | 1.2 |
| | 1.2 |
| | 1.1 |
|
| Liquidity guarantee charges | | 38.4 |
| | 31.7 |
| | 29.2 |
| | 47.0 |
| | 38.4 |
| | 31.7 |
|
| TOTAL EXPENSES | | 202.0 |
| | 182.9 |
| | 163.0 |
| | 205.2 |
| | 202.0 |
| | 182.9 |
|
| INVESTMENT INCOME, NET | | 565.1 |
| | 501.0 |
| | 489.8 |
| | 671.3 |
| | 565.1 |
| | 501.0 |
|
| NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS AND MORTGAGE LOANS PAYABLE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net realized gain (loss) on investments | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Real estate properties | | (6.2 | ) | | 215.4 |
| | 69.0 |
| | 42.0 |
| | (6.2 | ) | | 215.4 |
|
| Real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships | | 0.6 |
| | 167.3 |
| | (34.7 | ) | | (21.9 | ) | | 0.6 |
| | 167.3 |
|
| Marketable securities | | 25.6 |
| | 235.8 |
| | 65.4 |
| | 17.6 |
| | 25.6 |
| | 235.8 |
|
| Net realized gain on investments | | 20.0 |
| | 618.5 |
| | 99.7 |
| | 37.7 |
| | 20.0 |
| | 618.5 |
|
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Real estate properties | | 317.5 |
| | 487.2 |
| | 918.8 |
| | 135.5 |
| | 317.5 |
| | 487.2 |
|
| Real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships | | 236.9 |
| | 288.6 |
| | 372.0 |
| | 146.8 |
| | 236.9 |
| | 288.6 |
|
| Marketable securities | | 30.0 |
| | (255.1 | ) | | 302.8 |
| | 50.0 |
| | 30.0 |
| | (255.1 | ) |
| Loans receivable | | 0.3 |
| | 0.6 |
| | — |
| | 1.2 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 0.6 |
|
| Mortgage loans payable | | 15.1 |
| | 5.6 |
| | (64.9 | ) | | 15.9 |
| | 15.1 |
| | 5.6 |
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments and mortgage loans payable | | 599.8 |
| | 526.9 |
| | 1,528.7 |
| | 349.4 |
| | 599.8 |
| | 526.9 |
|
NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN ON INVESTMENTS AND MORTGAGE LOANS PAYABLE | | 619.8 |
| | 1,145.4 |
| | 1,628.4 |
| | 387.1 |
| | 619.8 |
| | 1,145.4 |
|
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS | | $ | 1,184.9 |
| | $ | 1,646.4 |
| | $ | 2,118.2 |
| | $ | 1,058.4 |
| | $ | 1,184.9 |
| | $ | 1,646.4 |
|
See notes to the consolidated financial statements
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
(In millions)
| | | | | Years Ended December 31, | | Years Ended December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| FROM OPERATIONS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Investment income, net | | $ | 565.1 |
| | $ | 501.0 |
| | $ | 489.8 |
| | $ | 671.3 |
| | $ | 565.1 |
| | $ | 501.0 |
|
| Net realized gain on investments | | 20.0 |
| | 618.5 |
| | 99.7 |
| | 37.7 |
| | 20.0 |
| | 618.5 |
|
| Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments and mortgage loans payable | | 599.8 |
| | 526.9 |
| | 1,528.7 |
| | 349.4 |
| | 599.8 |
| | 526.9 |
|
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS | | 1,184.9 |
| | 1,646.4 |
| | 2,118.2 |
| | 1,058.4 |
| | 1,184.9 |
| | 1,646.4 |
|
| FROM PARTICIPANT TRANSACTIONS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Premiums | | 3,064.2 |
| | 2,852.3 |
| | 2,432.6 |
| | 2,561.7 |
| | 3,064.2 |
| | 2,852.3 |
|
| Annuity payments | | (41.0 | ) | | (36.7 | ) | | (31.6 | ) | | (43.4 | ) | | (41.0 | ) | | (36.7 | ) |
| Withdrawals and death benefits | | (2,263.4 | ) | | (1,931.0 | ) | | (1,598.1 | ) | | (2,938.8 | ) | | (2,263.4 | ) | | (1,931.0 | ) |
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM PARTICIPANT TRANSACTIONS | | 759.8 |
| | 884.6 |
| | 802.9 |
| |
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM PARTICIPANT TRANSACTIONS | | | (420.5 | ) | | 759.8 |
| | 884.6 |
|
| NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS | | 1,944.7 |
| | 2,531.0 |
| | 2,921.1 |
| | 637.9 |
| | 1,944.7 |
| | 2,531.0 |
|
| NET ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Beginning of period | | 22,360.0 |
| | 19,829.0 |
| | 16,907.9 |
| | 24,304.7 |
| | 22,360.0 |
| | 19,829.0 |
|
| End of period | | $ | 24,304.7 |
| | $ | 22,360.0 |
| | $ | 19,829.0 |
| | $ | 24,942.6 |
| | $ | 24,304.7 |
| | $ | 22,360.0 |
|
See notes to the consolidated financial statements
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
| | | | | For the Years Ended December 31, | | Years Ended December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | | $ | 1,184.9 |
| | $ | 1,646.4 |
| | $ | 2,118.2 |
| | $ | 1,058.4 |
| | $ | 1,184.9 |
| | $ | 1,646.4 |
|
| Adjustments to reconcile net changes in net assets resulting from operations to net cash used in operating activities: | | | | | | | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net changes in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | | | | | | | |
| Net realized gain on investments | | (20.0 | ) | | (618.5 | ) | | (99.7 | ) | | (37.7 | ) | | (20.0 | ) | | (618.5 | ) |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments and mortgage loans payable | | (599.8 | ) | | (526.9 | ) | | (1,528.7 | ) | | (349.4 | ) | | (599.8 | ) | | (526.9 | ) |
| Purchase of real estate properties | | (623.9 | ) | | (1,229.6 | ) | | (1,368.2 | ) | | (538.2 | ) | | (623.9 | ) | | (1,229.6 | ) |
| Capital improvements on real estate properties | | (157.2 | ) | | (167.9 | ) | | (206.7 | ) | | (130.1 | ) | | (157.2 | ) | | (167.9 | ) |
| Proceeds from sale of real estate properties | | 251.1 |
| | 442.9 |
| | 933.8 |
| | 525.5 |
| | 251.1 |
| | 442.9 |
|
| Purchases of long term investments | | (1,379.4 | ) | | (1,102.4 | ) | | (458.9 | ) | | (592.0 | ) | | (1,379.4 | ) | | (1,102.4 | ) |
| Proceeds from long term investments | | 68.3 |
| | 1,499.8 |
| | 431.9 |
| | 385.3 |
| | 68.3 |
| | 1,499.8 |
|
| Increase in loans receivable | | (194.8 | ) | | (100.0 | ) | | — |
| | (1.9 | ) | | (194.8 | ) | | (100.0 | ) |
| (Increase) decrease in other investments | | 153.6 |
| | (376.5 | ) | | (711.8 | ) | | 165.9 |
| | 153.6 |
| | (376.5 | ) |
| Change in due to (from) investment manager | | (0.2 | ) | | 1.5 |
| | (4.7 | ) | | 4.9 |
| | (0.2 | ) | | 1.5 |
|
| (Increase) decrease in other assets | | (102.4 | ) | | (33.3 | ) | | 85.7 |
| | 61.7 |
| | (102.4 | ) | | (33.3 | ) |
| Increase (decrease) in other liabilities | | 122.3 |
| | 29.1 |
| | (1.7 | ) | | (72.6 | ) | | 122.3 |
| | 29.1 |
|
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | (1,297.5 | ) | | (535.4 | ) | | (810.8 | ) | |
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | 479.8 |
| | (1,297.5 | ) | | (535.4 | ) |
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Mortgage loan proceeds received | | 563.5 |
| | — |
| | 252.5 |
| | — |
| | 563.5 |
| | — |
|
| Payments of mortgage loans | | (34.7 | ) | | (373.8 | ) | | (222.7 | ) | | (50.6 | ) | | (34.7 | ) | | (373.8 | ) |
| Premiums | | 3,064.2 |
| | 2,852.3 |
| | 2,432.6 |
| | 2,561.7 |
| | 3,064.2 |
| | 2,852.3 |
|
| Annuity payments | | (41.0 | ) | | (36.7 | ) | | (31.6 | ) | | (43.4 | ) | | (41.0 | ) | | (36.7 | ) |
| Withdrawals and death benefits | | (2,263.4 | ) | | (1,931.0 | ) | | (1,598.1 | ) | | (2,938.8 | ) | | (2,263.4 | ) | | (1,931.0 | ) |
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | 1,288.6 |
| | 510.8 |
| | 832.7 |
| |
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | (471.1 | ) | | 1,288.6 |
| | 510.8 |
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | (8.9 | ) | | (24.6 | ) | | 21.9 |
| | 8.7 |
| | (8.9 | ) | | (24.6 | ) |
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Beginning of period | | 11.9 |
| | 36.5 |
| | 14.6 |
| | 3.0 |
| | 11.9 |
| | 36.5 |
|
| End of period | | $ | 3.0 |
| | $ | 11.9 |
| | $ | 36.5 |
| | $ | 11.7 |
| | $ | 3.0 |
| | $ | 11.9 |
|
| SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash paid for interest | | $ | 84.2 |
| | $ | 82.7 |
| | $ | 100.1 |
| | $ | 89.9 |
| | $ | 84.2 |
| | $ | 82.7 |
|
| Debt assumed as part of a real estate acquisition | | $ | 24.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 17.7 |
| | $ | 24.0 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Loan assignment as part of a real estate disposition | | $ | — |
| | $ | 200.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 45.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 200.0 |
|
| Conversion of note receivable | | $ | — |
| | $ | 100.6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 100.6 |
|
See notes to the consolidated financial statements
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1—Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Business: The TIAA Real Estate Account (“Account”) is an insurance separate account of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (“TIAA”) and was established by resolution of TIAA’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”) on February 22, 1995, under the insurance laws of the State of New York, for the purpose of funding variable annuity contracts issued by TIAA. The Account offers individual and group accumulating annuity contracts (with contributions made on a pre-tax or after-tax basis), as well as individual lifetime and term-certain variable payout annuity contracts (including the payment of death benefits to beneficiaries). Investors are entitled to transfer funds to or from the Account, and make withdrawals from the Account on a daily basis, under certain circumstances. Funds invested in the Account for each category of contract are expressed in terms of units, and unit values will fluctuate depending on the Account’s performance.
The investment objective of the Account is to seek favorable long-term returns primarily through rental income and capital appreciation from real estate and real estate-related investments owned by the Account. The Account holds real estate properties directly and through subsidiaries wholly-owned by TIAA for the benefit of the Account. The Account also holds limited interests in real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships, as well as investments in loans receivable with commercial real estate properties as underlying collateral. Additionally, the Account invests in real estate-related and non-real estate-related publicly traded securities, cash and other instruments to maintain adequate liquidity levels for operating expenses, capital expenditures and to fund benefit payments (withdrawals, transfers and related transactions).
Basis of Presentation:The consolidated financial statementsaccompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the Account and those subsidiaries wholly-owned by TIAA for the benefit of the Account. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions between the Account and such subsidiaries have been eliminated.
The Consolidated Financial Statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which requires the use of estimates made by management. Actual results may vary from those estimates and such differences may be material. The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies of the Account.
Basis of Presentation: The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the Account and those subsidiaries wholly-owned by TIAA for the benefit of the Account. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions between the Account and such subsidiaries have been eliminated.
The Accumulation Unit Value (“AUV”) used for financial reporting purposes may differ from the AUV used for processing transactions. The AUV used for financial reporting purposes includes security and participant transactions effective through the period end date to which this report relates. Total return is computed based on the AUV used for processing transactions.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation, with no effect on previously reported net assets.
Determination of Investments at Fair Value: The Account reports all investments at fair value in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 946, Financial Services—Investment Companies. Further in accordance with the adoption of the fair value option allowed under ASC 825, Financial Instruments, and at the election of Account management, mortgage loans payable are reported at fair value. The FASB has defined fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used to determine the fair value of the Account’s investments and investment related mortgage loans payable.
Valuation of Real Estate Properties—Investments in real estate properties are stated at fair value, as determined in accordance with policies and procedures reviewed by the Investment Committee of the Board and in accordance with the responsibilities of the Board as a whole. Accordingly, the Account does not record depreciation. Determination of fair value involves significant levels of judgment because the actual fair value of real estate can be determined only by negotiation between the parties in a sales transaction. The Account’s primary objective when valuing its real estate
investments will be to produce a valuation that represents a reasonable estimate of the fair value of its investments.
Implicit in the Account’s definition of fair value are the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby:
Buyer and seller are typically motivated;
Both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their best interests;
A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market;
Payment is made in terms of cash or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and
The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale.
Property and investment values are affected by, among other things, the availability of capital, occupancy rates, rental rates, and interest and inflation rates. As a result, determining real estate and investment values involves many assumptions. Key inputs and assumptions include rental income and expense amounts, related rental income and expense growth rates, capital expenditures, discount rates and capitalization rates. Valuation techniques include discounted cash flow analysis, prevailing market capitalization rates or multiples applied to earnings from the property, analysis of recent comparable sales transactions, actual sale negotiations and bona fide purchase offers received from third parties. Amounts ultimately realized from each investment may vary significantly from the fair value presented.
Real estate properties owned by the Account are initially valued based on an independent third party appraisal, as reviewed by TIAA’s internal appraisal staff and as applicable by the Account’s independent fiduciary at the time of the closing of the purchase. Such initial valuation may result in a potential unrealized gain or loss reflecting the difference between an investment’s fair value (i.e., exit price) and its cost basis (which is inclusive of transaction costs).
Subsequently, each property is appraised each quarter by an independent third party appraiser, reviewed by TIAA’s internal appraisal staff and as applicable the Account’s independent fiduciary. In general, the Account obtains appraisals of its real estate properties spread out throughout the quarter, which is intended to result in appraisal adjustments, and thus, adjustments to the valuations of its holdings (to the extent such adjustments are made) that happen regularly throughout each quarter and not on one specific day or month in each period.
Further, management reserves the right to order an appraisal and/or conduct another valuation outside of the normal quarterly process when facts or circumstances at a specific property change. For example, under certain circumstances a valuation adjustment could be made when the account receives a bona fide bid for the sale of a property held within the Account or one of the Account’s joint ventures. Adjustments may be made for events or circumstances indicating an impairment of a tenant’s ability to pay amounts due to the Account under a lease (including due to a bankruptcy filing of that tenant). Alternatively, adjustments may be made to reflect the execution or renewal of a significant lease. Also, adjustments may be made to reflect factors (such as sales values for comparable properties or local employment rate) bearing uniquely on a particular region in which the Account holds properties. TIAA’s internal appraisal staff oversees the entire appraisal process, in conjunction with the Account’s independent fiduciary (the independent fiduciary is more fully described in the following paragraph). Any differences in the conclusions of TIAA’s internal appraisal staff and the independent appraiser will be reviewed by the independent fiduciary, which will make a final determination on the matter (which may include ordering a subsequent independent appraisal).
The independent fiduciary, RERC, LLC, has been appointed by a special subcommittee of the Investment Committee of the Board to, among other things, oversee the appraisal process. The independent fiduciary must approve all independent appraisers used by the Account. All appraisals are performed in accordance with Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practices, the real estate appraisal industry standards created by The Appraisal Foundation. Real estate appraisals are estimates of property values based on a professional’s opinion. Appraisals of properties held outside of the U.S. are performed in accordance with industry standards commonly applied in the applicable jurisdiction. These independent appraisers are always expected to be MAI-designated members of the Appraisal Institute (or its European equivalent, Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors) and state certified appraisers from national or regional firms with relevant property type experience and market knowledge. Under the Account’s current procedures, each independent appraisal firm will be rotated off of a particular property at least every three years, although such appraisal firm may perform appraisals of other Account properties subsequent to such rotation.
Also, the independent fiduciary can require additional appraisals if factors or events have occurred that could materially change a property’s value (including those identified above) and such change is not reflected in the quarterly valuation review, or otherwise to ensure that the Account is valued appropriately. The independent fiduciary must also approve any valuation change of real estate-related assets where a property’s value changed by more than 6% from the most recent independent annual appraisal, or if the value of the Account would change by more than 4% within any calendar quarter or more than 2% since the prior calendar month. When a real estate property is subject to a mortgage, the property is valued independently of the mortgage and the property and mortgage fair values are reported separately (see Valuation of Mortgage Loans Payable). The independent fiduciary reviews and approves all mortgage valuation adjustments before such adjustments are recorded by the Account. The Account continues to use the revised value for each real estate property and mortgage loan payable to calculate the Account’s daily net asset value until the next valuation review or appraisal.
Valuation of Real Estate Joint Ventures—Real estate joint ventures are stated at the fair value of the Account’s ownership interests of the underlying entities. The Account’s ownership interests are valued based on the fair value of the underlying real estate, any related mortgage loans payable, and other factors, such as ownership percentage, ownership rights, buy/sell agreements, distribution provisions and capital call obligations. Upon the disposition of all real estate investments by an investee entity, the Account will continue to state its equity in the remaining net assets of the investee entity during the wind down period, if any, which occurs prior to the dissolution of the investee entity.
Valuation of Real Estate Limited Partnerships—Limited partnership interests are stated at the fair value of the Account’s ownership in the partnership which are recorded based upon the changes in the net asset values of the limited partnerships as determined from the financial statements of the limited partnerships when received by the Account. Prior to the receipt of the financial statements from the limited partnerships, the Account estimates the value of its interest in good faith and will from time to time seek input from the issuer or the sponsor of the investments. Since market quotations are not readily available, the limited partnership interests are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by management under the direction of the Investment Committee of the Board and in accordance with the responsibilities of the Board as a whole.
Valuation of Marketable Securities—Equity securities listed or traded on any national market or exchange are valued at the last sale price as of the close of the principal securities market or exchange on which such securities are traded or, if there is no sale, at the mean of the last bid and asked prices on such market or exchange, exclusive of transaction costs.
Debt securities with readily available market quotations, other than money market instruments, are generally valued at the most recent bid price or the equivalent quoted yield for such securities (or those of comparable maturity, quality and type). Debt securities for which market quotations are not readily available, are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the Investment Committee of the Board and in accordance with the responsibilities of the Board as a whole.
Short-term investments are valued in the same manner as debt securities, as described above.
Money market instruments are valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.
Equity and fixed income securities traded on a foreign exchange or in foreign markets are valued using their closing values under the valuation methods generally accepted in the country where traded, as of the valuation date. This value is converted to U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect on the valuation day. Under certain circumstances (for example, if there are significant movements in the U.S. markets and there is an expectation the securities traded on foreign markets will adjust based on such movements when the foreign markets open the next day), the Account may adjust the value of equity or fixed income securities that trade on a foreign exchange or market after the foreign exchange or market has closed.
Valuation of Loans Receivable (i.e. the Account as a creditor)—Loans receivable are stated at fair value and are initially valued at the face amount of the loan funding. Subsequently, loans receivable are valued at least quarterly by TIAA’s internal valuation department based on market factors, such as market interest rates and spreads for comparable loans, the liquidity for loans of similar characteristics, the performance of the underlying collateral (such as the loan-to-value ratio and the cash flow of the underlying collateral) and the credit quality of the counterparty. The independent fiduciary reviews and approves
reviews and approves all loan receivable valuation adjustments before such adjustments are recorded by the Account. The Account continues to use the revised value for each loan receivable to calculate the Account’s daily net asset value until the next valuation review. Loan origination costs are expensed as incurred.
Valuation of Mortgage Loans Payable (i.e. the Account as a debtor)—Mortgage loans payable are stated at fair value. The estimated fair values of mortgage loans payable are based on the amount at which the liability could be transferred to a third party exclusive of transaction costs. Mortgage loans payable are valued internally by TIAA’s internal valuation department, as reviewed by the Account’s independent fiduciary, at least quarterly based on market factors, such as market interest rates and spreads for comparable loans, the performance of the underlying collateral (such as the loan-to-value ratio and the cash flow of the underlying collateral), the liquidity for mortgage loans of similar characteristics, the maturity date of the loan and the return demands of the market.
See Note 5—Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis for further discussion and disclosure regarding the determination of the fair value of the Account’s investments.
Foreign Currency Transactions and Translation: Portfolio investments and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates prevailing at the end of the period. Purchases and sales of securities, income receipts and expense payments made in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates prevailing on the respective dates of the transactions. The effect of any changes in foreign currency exchange rates on portfolio investments and mortgage loans payable are included in net realized and unrealized gains and losses on real estate properties and mortgage loans payable. Net realized gains and losses on foreign currency transactions include disposition of foreign currencies, and currency gains and losses between the accrual and receipt dates of portfolio investment income and between the trade and settlement dates of portfolio investment transactions.
Accumulation and Annuity Funds: The accumulation fund represents the net assets attributable to participants in the accumulation phase of their investment (“Accumulation Fund”). The annuity fund represents the net assets attributable to the participants currently receiving annuity payments (“Annuity Fund”). The net increase or decrease in net assets from investment operations is apportioned between the accounts based upon their relative daily net asset values. Once an Account participant begins receiving lifetime annuity income benefits, payment levels cannot be reduced as a result of the Account’s actual mortality experience. In addition, the contracts pursuant to which the Account is offered are required to stipulate the maximum expense charge for all Account level expenses that can be assessed, which is not to exceed 2.5% of average net assets per year. The Account pays a fee to TIAA to assume mortality and expense risks.
Accounting for Investments: The investments held by the Account are accounted for as follows:
Real Estate Properties—Rent from real estate properties consists of all amounts earned under tenant operating leases, including base rent, recoveries of real estate taxes and other expenses and charges for miscellaneous services provided to tenants. Rental income is recognized in accordance with the billing terms of the lease agreements. The Account bears the direct expenses of the real estate properties owned. These expenses include, but are not limited to, fees to local property management companies, property taxes, utilities, maintenance, repairs, insurance, and other operating and administrative costs. An estimate of the net operating income earned from each real estate property is accrued by the Account on a daily basis and such estimates are adjusted when actual operating results are determined.
Real Estate Joint Ventures—The Account has limited ownership interests in various real estate joint ventures (collectively, the “joint ventures”). The Account records its contributions as increases to its investments in the joint ventures, and distributions from the joint ventures are treated as income within income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships in the Account’s consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operations.Operations. Distributions that are identified as returns of capital are recorded as a reduction to the cost basis of the investment, whereas distributions identified as capital gains or losses are recorded as realized gains or losses. Income distributions from the joint ventures are recorded based on the Account’s proportional interest of the income distributed by the joint ventures. Income earned but not yet distributed to the Account by the joint ventures is recorded as unrealized gains and losses.
Limited Partnerships—The Account has limited ownership interests in various private real estate funds (primarily limited partnerships) and a private real estate investment trust (collectively, the “limited partnerships”). The Account records its contributions as increases to the investments, and distributions from the investments are treated as income
within income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships in the Account’s consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operations.Operations. Distributions that are identified as returns of capital are recorded as a reduction to the cost basis of the investment, whereas distributions identified as capital gains or losses are recorded as realized gains or losses. Unrealized gains and losses are recorded based upon the changes in the net asset values of the limited partnerships as determined from the financial statements of the limited partnerships when received by the Account. Prior to the receipt of the financial statements from the limited partnerships, the Account estimates the value of its interest in good faith and will from time to time seek input from the issuer or the sponsor of the investments. Changes in value based on such estimates are recorded by the Account as unrealized gains and losses.
Marketable Securities—Transactions in marketable securities are accounted for as of the date the securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Interest income is recorded as earned. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date within dividend income. Dividends that are identified as returns of capital are recorded as a reduction to the cost basis of the investment, whereas dividends identified as capital gains or losses are recorded as realized gains or losses. Realized gains and losses on securities transactions are accounted for on the specific identification method.
Loans Receivable—Loans receivable are stated at fair value and are initially valued at the face amount of the loan funding. Subsequently, loans receivable are valued at least quarterly by TIAA’s internal valuation department with changes in fair value flowing through unrealized gain (loss). Interest income from loans receivable is recognized using the effective interest method over the expected life of the loan. All loans receivable held to date were originated directly by the Account.
Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses—Realized gains and losses are recorded at the time an investment is sold or a distribution is received in relation to an investment sale from a joint venture or limited partnership. Real estate transactions are accounted for as of the date on which the purchase or sale transactions for the real estate properties close (settlement date). The Account recognizes a realized gain on the sale of a real estate property to the extent that the contract sales price exceeds the cost-to-date of the property being sold. A realized loss occurs when the cost-to-date exceeds the sales price. Unrealized gains and losses are recorded as the fair values of the Account’s investments are adjusted, and as discussed within the Real Estate Joint Ventures and Limited Partnerships sections above.
Net Assets—The Account’s net assets as of the close of each valuation day are valued by taking the sum of:
the value of the Account’s cash; cash equivalents, and short-term and other debt instruments;
the value of the Account’s other securities and other non-real estate assets;
the value of the individual real properties (based on the most recent valuation of that property) and other real estate-related investments owned by the Account;
an estimate of the net operating income accrued by the Account from its properties, other real estate-related investments and non-real estate-related investments (including short-term marketable securities) since the end of the prior valuation day; and
actual net operating income earned from the Account’s properties, other real estate-related investments and non-real estate-related investments (but only to the extent any such item of income differs from the estimated income accrued for on such investments),
and then reducing the sum by liabilities held within the Account, including the daily investment management fee, administration and distribution fees, mortality and expense fee, and liquidity guarantee fee, and certain other expenses attributable to operating the Account. Daily estimates of net operating income are adjusted to reflect actual net operating income on a monthly basis, at which time such adjustments (if any) are reflected in the Account’s unit value.
After the end of every quarter, the Account reconciles the amount of expenses deducted from the Account (which is established in order to approximate the costs that the Account will incur) with the expenses the Account actually incurred. If there is a difference, the Account adds it to or deducts it from the Account in equal daily installments over the remaining days of the following quarter. Material differences may be repaid in the current calendar quarter. The Account’s at-cost deductions are based on projections of Account assets and overall expenses, and the size of any adjusting payments will be directly affected by the difference between management’s projections and the Account’s actual assets or expenses.
Income from Securities Lending: The Account may lend securities to qualified borrowers to generate additional income. When loaning securities, the Account retains the benefits of owning the securities, including the economic equivalent of dividends or interest generated by the securities. Cash collateral received for securities on loan is maintained exclusively in an interest-bearing deposit account. All income generated by the securities lending program is reflected within interest income on the consolidated statementsAccount's Consolidated Statements of operations.Operations.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents are balances held by the Account in bank deposit accounts which, at times, exceed federally insured limits. The Account’s management monitors these balances to mitigate the exposure of risk due to concentration and has not experienced any losses from such concentration.
Other Assets and Other Liabilities: Other assets and other liabilities consist of operating assets and liabilities utilized and held at each individual real estate property investment. Other assets consist of, amongst other items, cash, tenant receivables and prepaid expenses; whereas other liabilities primarily consist of security deposits. Other assets also include cash collateral held for securities on loan.
Federal Income Taxes: Based on provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, Section 817, the Account is taxed as a segregated asset account of TIAA and as such, the Account incurs no material federal income tax attributable to the net investment activity of the Account. The Account’s federal income tax return is generally subject to examination for a period of three years after filed. State and local tax returns may be subject to examination for an additional period of time depending on the jurisdiction. Management has analyzed the Account’s tax positions taken for all open federal income tax years and has concluded that no provision for federal income tax is required in the Account’s consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) was signed into law on December 22, 2017. The Act changes existing United States tax law and includes numerous provisions that will affect businesses. The Act reduces the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, includes several base broadening provisions, as well as, reform to the US international tax system.
The Act does not result in any material impact to the Account.
Restricted Cash: The Account held $45.8$42.3 million and $50.9$45.8 million as of December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively, in escrow accounts for property taxes, insurance, and various other property related matters as required by certain creditors related to outstanding mortgage loans payable collateralized by certain real estate investments. These amounts are recorded within other assetsOther Assets on the consolidated statementsAccount's Consolidated Statements of assetsAssets and liabilities.Liabilities. See Note 8—Mortgage Loans Payable for additional information regarding the Account’s outstanding mortgage loans payable.
Changes in Net Assets: Premiums include premiums paid by existing accumulation unit holders in the Account and transfers into the Account. Withdrawals and death benefits include withdrawals out of the Account which include transfers out of the Account and required minimum distributions.
Due to/from Investment Manager: Due to/from investment manager represents amounts that are to be paid or received by TIAA on behalf of the Account. Amounts generally are paid or received by the Account within one or two business days and no interest is contractually charged on these amounts.
New Accounting Pronouncements: In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 supersedes all existing revenue recognition guidance and establishes a five-step model to measure and recognize revenue. ASU 2014-09 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, the Account will adopt ASU 2014-09 as of January 1, 2018 utilizing the modified retrospective adoption approach. The Account has completed its implementation analysis of ASU 2014-09 and determined it will be immaterially impacted by the adoption.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-1 Financial Instruments (Topic 825)—: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016-1”). This ASU amends, amongstamong other items, certain aspects of the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. These amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017.
2017, and the Account plans to adopt the guidance as of January 1, 2018. Management is currently assessinghas completed its initial scoping for the adoption of the ASU 2016-01 and does not expect the guidance to materially impact of ASU 2016-1 on the Account’s Consolidated Financial Statements.Account.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-2 Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-2”) which will supersede Topic 840, Leases. This ASU applies to all entities that enter into a lease. Lessees will be required to report assets and liabilities that arise from leases. Lessor accounting is expected to remain unchanged except in certain circumstances. The ASU also contains certain practical expedients, which the Account plans to elect, including the practical expedient not to separate lease and non-lease components whereby both components are accounted for and recognized as lease components. In January 2018, the FASB issued a proposal for comment that would allow lessors to elect a similar practical expedient by class of underlying assets to not separate non-lease components from the lease component. The Lessor’s practical expedient election would be limited to circumstances in which (i) the timing and pattern of revenue recognition are the same for the non-lease component and the related lease component and (ii) the combined single lease component would be classified as an operating lease. If the exposed practical expedient is issued in its existing form, the Account expects to elect the practical expedient which would allow the Account the ability to combine the lease and non-lease components if the underlying asset meets the two criteria above. This ASU is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including all interim periods within those fiscal years. Management is currently assessinghas completed its initial scoping for the impactadoption of the ASU 2016-2 onand does not expect the Account’s Consolidated Financial Statements.adoption of such guidance to materially impact the Account.
In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) -: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 clarifies how to present cash receipts and cash payments for certain activity in the Statement of Cash Flows. These amendments are effective for public business entities within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within
those fiscal years.years and should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. Management is currently assessinghas completed its initial scoping for the impactadoption of the ASU 2016-15 onand does not expect the Account's Consolidated Financial Statements.adoption of such guidance to materially impact the Account. The Account plans to adopt the guidance as of January 1, 2018.
In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash ("ASU 2016-18"). The statement of cash flows should present beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts that include cash and restricted cash. Transfers between cash and restricted cash will no longer be presented as operating investing, or financing activities within the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 is effective for annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017.2017 and should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. Management is currently assessingexpects that the impact of ASU 2016-18 will require modification to the presentation of restricted cash on the Account's Consolidated Financial Statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers(“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 supersedes all existing revenue recognition guidance and establishes a five-step model to measure and recognize revenue. ASU 2014-09 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and theStatements of Cash Flows. The Account plans to adopt the new revenue guidance as of January 1, 2018. The Account has completed its initial scoping for the adoption of ASU 2014-09 and has determined that a limited number of asset management agreements will be in the scope of the new guidance. However, the revenue recognition patterns related to the services performed under the asset management agreements are not expected to be significantly different from the revenue recognition pattern under existing GAAP. For the adoption of ASU 2014-09, the Account is planning to utilize the modified retrospective adoption approach. Management is currently in the process of fully adopting the guidance and evaluating the final impact of the new standard.
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“("ASU 2017-01”2017-01"). ASU 2017-01 provides guidance for evaluating whether a set of transferred assets and activities is a business, which may result in certain real estate acquisitions being accounted for as asset acquisitions rather than business combinations. ASU 2017-01 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Management is currently assessing2017, however, this guidance will not impact the impactAccount.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-05, Other Income-Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets. The amendments in ASU 2017-012017-05 clarify the scope and application of ASC 610-20 on the Account’s Consolidated Financial Statements.sale or transfer of nonfinancial assets and in substance nonfinancial assets to noncustomers, including partial sales. ASU 2017-05 is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods. The amendments may be either retrospectively applied to each period presented within the financial statements or by a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings or net assets as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Account will elect the modified retrospective approach upon adoption. Management has completed its initial scoping for the adoption of the ASU 2017-05 and does not expect the guidance to materially impact the Account. The Account plans to adopt the guidance as of January 1, 2018.
Note 2—Management Agreements, Arrangements and Related Party Transactions
Investment advisory services for the Account are provided by TIAA employees, under the direction of the Board and its Investment Committee, pursuant to investment management procedures adopted by TIAA for the Account. TIAA’s investment management decisions for the Account are subject to review by the Account’s independent fiduciary. TIAA also provides various portfolio accounting and related services for the Account.
The Account is a party to the Distribution Agreement for the Contracts Funded by the TIAA Real Estate Account (the “Distribution Agreement”), dated January 1, 2008, by and among TIAA, for itself and on behalf of the Account, and TIAA-CREF Individual and Institutional Services, LLC (“Services”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of TIAA, a registered broker-dealer and a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. Pursuant to the Distribution Agreement, Services performs distribution services for the Account which include, among other things, (i) distribution of annuity contracts issued by TIAA and funded by the Account, (ii) advising existing annuity contract owners in connection with their accumulations and (iii) helping employers implement and manage retirement plans. In addition, TIAA performs administrative functions for the Account, which include, among other things, (i) maintaining accounting records and performing accounting services, (ii) receiving and allocating premiums, (iii) calculating and making annuity payments, (iv) processing withdrawal requests, (v) providing regulatory compliance and reporting services, (vi) maintaining the Account’s records of contract ownership and (vii) otherwise assisting generally in all aspects of the Account’s operations. Both distribution services (pursuant to the Distribution Agreement) and administrative services are provided to the Account by Services and TIAA, as applicable, on an at cost basis.
The Distribution Agreement is terminable by either party upon 60 days written notice and terminates automatically upon any assignment thereof.
TIAA and Services provide investment management, administrative and distribution services at cost. TIAA and Services receive payments from the Account on a daily basis according to formulas established each year and adjusted periodically with the objective of keeping the payments as close as possible to the Account’s expenses actually incurred. Any differences between actual expenses and the amounts paid by the Account are adjusted quarterly.
TIAA also provides a liquidity guarantee to the Account, for a fee, to ensure that sufficient funds are available to meet participant transfer and cash withdrawal requests in the event that the Account’s cash flows and liquid investments are insufficient to fund such requests. TIAA ensures sufficient funds are available for such transfer and withdrawal requests by purchasing accumulation units of the Account.
To the extent TIAA owns accumulation units issued pursuant to the liquidity guarantee, the independent fiduciary monitors and oversees, among other things, TIAA’s ownership interest in the Account and may require TIAA to eventually redeem some of its units, particularly when the Account has un-invested cash or liquid investments available. TIAA also receives a fee for assuming certain mortality and expense risks.
The expenses for the services noted above that are provided to the Account by TIAA and Services are identified in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and are reflected in Note 9—Financial Highlights.
Pursuant to its existing liquidity guarantee obligation, the TIAA General Account purchased in multiple transactions an aggregate of 4.7 million accumulation units (which are generally referred to as “liquidity units”) in the Account between December 2008 and June 2009 for an aggregate amount of $1.2 billion. TIAA has not purchased additional liquidity units since June 2009.
In accordance with this liquidity guarantee obligation, TIAA guarantees that all participants in the Account may redeem their accumulation units at their accumulation unit value next determined after their transfer or cash withdrawal request is received in good order. Liquidity units owned by TIAA are valued in the same manner as accumulation units owned by the Account’s participants. Management believes that TIAA has the ability to meet its obligations under the liquidity guarantee.
In accordance with a prohibited transaction exemption from the U.S. Department of Labor (PTE 96-76), the Account’s independent fiduciary, RERC, has certain responsibilities with respect to the Account that it has undertaken or is currently undertaking with respect to TIAA’s purchase of liquidity units, including among other things, reviewing the purchase and redemption of liquidity units by TIAA to ensure the Account uses the correct unit values. In addition, as set forth in PTE 96-76, the independent fiduciary’s responsibilities include:
establishing the percentage of total accumulation units that TIAA’s ownership should not exceed (the “trigger point”) and creating a method for changing the trigger point;
approving any adjustment of TIAA’s ownership interest in the Account and, in its discretion, requiring an adjustment if TIAA’s ownership of liquidity units reaches the trigger point; and
once the trigger point has been reached, participating in any program to reduce TIAA’s ownership in the Account by utilizing cash flow or liquid investments in the Account, or by utilizing the proceeds from asset sales. The independent fiduciary’s role in participating in any such asset sales program would include (i) participating in the selection of properties for sale, (ii) providing sales guidelines and (iii) approving those sales if, in the independent fiduciary’s opinion, such sales are desirable to reduce TIAA’s ownership of liquidity units.
To the extent TIAA owns accumulation units issued pursuant to the liquidity guarantee, the independent fiduciary monitors and oversees, among other things, TIAA’s ownership interest in the Account and may require TIAA to eventually redeem some of its units, particularly when the Account has un-invested cash or liquid investments available. TIAA also receives a fee for assuming certain mortality and expense risks.
The independent fiduciary, which has the right to adjust the trigger point, has established the trigger point at 45% of the outstanding accumulation units and it will continue to monitor TIAA’s ownership interest in the Account and provide further recommendations as necessary.
As of March 31, 2013, the independent fiduciary completed the systematic redemption of all of the liquidity units held by TIAA. Approximately one-quarter of such units were redeemed evenly over the business days in each of the months of June, September, December 2012, and March 2013, representing a total of $940.3 million and $325.4 million redeemed during 2012 and 2013, respectively.
TIAA and Services provide certain services to the Account on an at cost basis. See Note 9—Financial Highlights for details of the expense charge and expense ratio.
Note 3—Credit Risk Concentrations
Concentrations of credit risk may arise when a number of properties or tenants are located in a similar geographic region such that the economic conditions of that region could impact tenants’ obligations to meet their contractual obligations or cause the values of individual properties to decline. The Account has no significant concentrations of tenants as no single tenant has annual contract rent that makes up more than 3%2% of the rental income of the Account.
The Account’s wholly-owned real estate investments and investments in joint ventures are located in the United States. The following table represents the diversification of the Account’s portfolio by region and property type as of December 31, 2016:
Diversification by Fair Value(1)2017:
| | Diversification by Fair Value(1) | | Diversification by Fair Value(1) |
| | | West | | East | | South | | Midwest | | Total | | West | | East | | South | | Midwest | | Total |
| Office | | 16.6 | % | | 20.9 | % | | 5.7 | % | | — | % | | 43.2 | % | | 16.1 | % | | 20.2 | % | | 5.6 | % | | — | % | | 41.9 | % |
| Apartment | | 8.7 | % | | 8.6 | % | | 3.9 | % | | — | % | | 21.2 | % | | 8.4 | % | | 8.0 | % | | 3.6 | % | | 0.9 | % | | 20.9 | % |
| Retail | | 7.6 | % | | 3.1 | % | | 7.8 | % | | 0.5 | % | | 19.0 | % | | 8.1 | % | | 3.0 | % | | 7.6 | % | | 0.7 | % | | 19.4 | % |
| Industrial | | 7.6 | % | | 1.5 | % | | 3.9 | % | | 0.8 | % | | 13.8 | % | | 7.5 | % | | 2.0 | % | | 4.1 | % | | 0.8 | % | | 14.4 | % |
Other(2) | | 0.3 | % | | 2.4 | % | | 0.1 | % | | — | % | | 2.8 | % | | 0.6 | % | | 2.6 | % | | 0.1 | % | | 0.1 | % | | 3.4 | % |
| Total | | 40.8 | % | | 36.5 | % | | 21.4 | % | | 1.3 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 40.7 | % | | 35.8 | % | | 21.0 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 100.0 | % |
| |
(1) | Wholly-owned properties are represented at fair value and gross of any debt, while joint venture properties are represented at the net equity value. |
| |
(2) | Represents interestinterests in Storage Portfolio investment andinvestments, a fee interest encumbered by a ground lease real estate investment.investment and land. |
Properties in the “West” region are located in: AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NM, NV, OR, UT, WA, WY
Properties in the “East” region are located in: CT, DC, DE, KY, MA, MD, ME, NC, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, SC, VA, VT, WV
Properties in the “South” region are located in: AL, AR, FL, GA, LA, MS, OK, TN, TX
Properties in the “Midwest” region are located in: IA, IL, IN, KS, MI, MN, MO, ND, NE, OH, SD, WI
Note 4—Leases
The Account’s wholly-owned real estate properties are leased to tenants under operating lease agreements which expire on various dates through 2090. Aggregate minimum annual rentals for wholly-owned real estate investments owned by the Account through the non-cancelable lease term, excluding short-term residential leases, are as follows (in millions):
| | | | Years Ending December 31, | Years Ending December 31, |
| 2017 | $ | 572.9 |
| |
| 2018 | 539.4 |
| $ | 592.3 |
|
| 2019 | 487.8 |
| 556.9 |
|
| 2020 | 426.5 |
| 503.6 |
|
| 2021 | 353.9 |
| 426.7 |
|
| 2022 | | 354.1 |
|
| Thereafter | 2,883.4 |
| 2,764.6 |
|
| Total | $ | 5,263.9 |
| $ | 5,198.2 |
|
Certain leases provide for additional rental amounts based upon the recovery of actual operating expenses in excess of specified base amounts, sales volume or contractual increases as defined in the lease agreement. These contractual contingent rentals are not included in the table above.
Note 5—Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Valuation Hierarchy: The Account’s fair value measurements are grouped categorically into three levels, as defined by the FASB. The levels are defined as follows:
Level 1—Valuations using unadjusted quoted prices for assets traded in active markets, such as stocks listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Active markets are defined as having the following characteristics for the measured asset or liability: (i) many transactions, (ii) current prices, (iii) price quotes not varying substantially among market makers, (iv) narrow bid/ask spreads and (v) most information regarding the issuer is publicly available. Level 1 assets held by the Account are generally marketable equity securities.
Level 2—Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active, dealer or broker markets. Fair values are primarily obtained from third party pricing services for identical or comparable assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs for fair value measurements are inputs, other than quoted prices included within Level 1, that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include:
| |
| a. | Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; |
| |
| b. | Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active (that is, markets in which there are few transactions for the asset (or liability), the prices are not current, price quotations vary substantially either over time or among market makers (for example, some brokered markets), or in which little information is released publicly); |
| |
| c. | Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable within the market for the asset (or liability) (for example, interest rates and yield curves, implied volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks, and default rates that are observable at commonly quoted intervals); and |
| |
| d. | Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (for example, market-corroborated inputs). |
Examples of securities which may be held by the Account and included in Level 2 include certificates of deposit, commercial paper, government agency notes, variable notes, United States Treasury securities, and debt securities.
Level 3—Valuations for assets and liabilities that are derived from other valuation methodologies, including pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, and are not based on market exchange, dealer, or broker-traded transactions. Level 3 valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections that are not observable in the market, and require significant professional judgment in determining the fair value assigned to such assets or liabilities.
Examples of Level 3 assets and liabilities which may be held by the Account from time to time include investments in real estate, investments in joint ventures, and loans receivable and payable.
An investment’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy described above is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Account’s limited partnership investments are valued using the net asset value per share as a practical expedient, which excludes the investments from the valuation hierarchy.
The Account’s determination of fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based upon vendor-provided, evaluated prices or internally developed models that primarily use market-based or independently sourced market data, including interest rate yield curves, market spreads, and currency rates. Valuation adjustments will be made to reflect changes in credit quality, counterparty’s creditworthiness, the Account’s creditworthiness, liquidity, and other observable and unobservable inputs that are applied consistently over time.
The methods described above are considered to produce fair values that represent a good faith estimate of what an unaffiliated buyer in the marketplace would pay to purchase the asset or would receive to transfer the liability. Since fair value calculations involve significant professional judgment in the application of both observable and unobservable attributes, actual realizable values or future fair values may differ from amounts reported. Furthermore, while the Account believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments, while reasonable, could result in different estimates of fair value at the reporting date. As discussed in Note 1—Organization and Significant Accounting Policies in more detail, the Account generally obtains independent third party appraisals on a quarterly
basis; there may be circumstances in the interim in which the true realizable value of a property is not reflected in the Account’s daily net asset value calculation or in the Account’s periodic consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements. This disparity may be more apparent when the commercial and/or residential real estate markets experience an overall and possibly dramatic decline (or increase) in property values in a relatively short period of time between appraisals.
The following tables show the major categories of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, using unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1); significant other observable inputs (Level 2); significant unobservable inputs (Level 3); and Practical Expedient (in millions):
| | | Description | | Level 1: Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets | | Level 2: Significant Other Observable Inputs | | Level 3: Significant Unobservable Inputs | | Fair Value Using Practical Expedient | | Total at December 31, 2016 | | Level 1: Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets | | Level 2: Significant Other Observable Inputs | | Level 3: Significant Unobservable Inputs | | Fair Value Using Practical Expedient | | Total at December 31, 2017 |
| Real estate properties | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 15,452.8 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 15,452.8 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 15,742.7 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 15,742.7 |
|
| Real estate joint ventures | | — |
| | — |
| | 5,622.4 |
| | — |
| | 5,622.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,860.6 |
| | — |
| | 5,860.6 |
|
| Limited partnerships | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 137.5 |
| | 137.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 142.4 |
| | 142.4 |
|
| Marketable securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Real estate related | | 1,081.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,081.5 |
| |
| Real estate-related | | | 1,238.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,238.0 |
|
| Government agency notes | | — |
| | 2,308.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,308.9 |
| | — |
| | 2,872.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,872.3 |
|
| United States Treasury securities | | — |
| | 1,744.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,744.9 |
| | — |
| | 1,015.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,015.2 |
|
| Loans receivable | | — |
| | — |
| | 295.7 |
| | — |
| | 295.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 298.8 |
| | — |
| | 298.8 |
|
Total Investments at
December 31, 2016 | | $ | 1,081.5 |
| | $ | 4,053.8 |
| | $ | 21,370.9 |
| | $ | 137.5 |
| | $ | 26,643.7 |
| |
Total Investments at
December 31, 2017 | | | $ | 1,238.0 |
| | $ | 3,887.5 |
| | $ | 21,902.1 |
| | $ | 142.4 |
| | $ | 27,170.0 |
|
| Mortgage loans payable | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (2,332.1 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (2,332.1 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (2,238.3 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (2,238.3 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Description | | Level 1: Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets | | Level 2: Significant Other Observable Inputs | | Level 3: Significant Unobservable Inputs | | Fair Value Using Practical Expedient | | Total at December 31, 2015 |
| Real estate properties | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 14,606.2 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 14,606.2 |
|
| Real estate joint ventures | | — |
| | — |
| | 4,068.4 |
| | — |
| | 4,068.4 |
|
| Limited partnerships | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 144.8 |
| | 144.8 |
|
| Marketable securities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Real estate related | | 1,024.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,024.4 |
|
| Government agency notes | | — |
| | 2,666.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,666.8 |
|
| United States Treasury securities | | — |
| | 1,540.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,540.4 |
|
| Loan receivable | | — |
| | — |
| | 100.6 |
| | — |
| | 100.6 |
|
Total Investments at
December 31, 2015 | | $ | 1,024.4 |
| | $ | 4,207.2 |
| | $ | 18,775.2 |
| | $ | 144.8 |
| | $ | 24,151.6 |
|
| Mortgage loans payable | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (1,794.4 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (1,794.4 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Description | | Level 1: Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets | | Level 2: Significant Other Observable Inputs | | Level 3: Significant Unobservable Inputs | | Fair Value Using Practical Expedient | | Total at December 31, 2016 |
| Real estate properties | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 15,452.8 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 15,452.8 |
|
| Real estate joint ventures | | — |
| | — |
| | 5,622.4 |
| | — |
| | 5,622.4 |
|
| Limited partnerships | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 137.5 |
| | 137.5 |
|
| Marketable securities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Real estate-related | | 1,081.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,081.5 |
|
| Government agency notes | | — |
| | 2,308.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,308.9 |
|
| United States Treasury securities | | — |
| | 1,744.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,744.9 |
|
| Loans receivable | | — |
| | — |
| | 295.7 |
| | — |
| | 295.7 |
|
Total Investments at
December 31, 2016 | | $ | 1,081.5 |
| | $ | 4,053.8 |
| | $ | 21,370.9 |
| | $ | 137.5 |
| | $ | 26,643.7 |
|
| Mortgage loans payable | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (2,332.1 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (2,332.1 | ) |
The following tables show the reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the years ended December 31, 20162017 and 20152016 (in millions):
| | | | | Real Estate Properties | | Real Estate Joint Ventures | | Loans Receivable | | Total Level 3 Investments | | Mortgage Loans Payable | | Real Estate Properties | | Real Estate Joint Ventures | | Loans Receivable | | Total Level 3 Investments | | Mortgage Loans Payable |
| For the year ended December 31, 2016 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Beginning balance January 1, 2016 | | $ | 14,606.2 |
| | $ | 4,068.4 |
| | $ | 100.6 |
| | $ | 18,775.2 |
| | $ | (1,794.4 | ) | |
| For the year ended December 31, 2017 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Beginning balance January 1, 2017 | | | $ | 15,452.8 |
| | $ | 5,622.4 |
| | $ | 295.7 |
| | $ | 21,370.9 |
| | $ | (2,332.1 | ) |
| Total realized and unrealized gains included in changes in net assets | | 311.3 |
| | 242.8 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 554.4 |
| | 15.1 |
| | 177.5 |
| | 123.5 |
| | 1.2 |
| | 302.2 |
| | 15.9 |
|
Purchases(1) | | 786.4 |
| | 1,313.6 |
| | 194.8 |
| | 2,294.8 |
| | (587.5 | ) | | 682.9 |
| | 419.0 |
| | 1.9 |
| | 1,103.8 |
| | (17.7 | ) |
| Sales | | (251.1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (251.1 | ) | | — |
| | (570.5 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (570.5 | ) | | — |
|
Settlements(2) | | — |
| | (2.4 | ) | | — |
| | (2.4 | ) | | 34.7 |
| | — |
| | (304.3 | ) | | — |
| | (304.3 | ) | | 95.6 |
|
| Ending balance December 31, 2016 | | $ | 15,452.8 |
| | $ | 5,622.4 |
| | $ | 295.7 |
| | $ | 21,370.9 |
| | $ | (2,332.1 | ) | |
| Ending balance December 31, 2017 | | | $ | 15,742.7 |
| | $ | 5,860.6 |
| | $ | 298.8 |
| | $ | 21,902.1 |
| | $ | (2,238.3 | ) |
| | | | | Real Estate Properties | | Real Estate Joint Ventures | | Loan Receivable | | Total Level 3 Investments | | Mortgage Loans Payable | | Real Estate Properties | | Real Estate Joint Ventures | | Loans Receivable | | Total Level 3 Investments | | Mortgage Loans Payable |
| For the year ended December 31, 2015 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Beginning balance January 1, 2015 | | $ | 13,139.0 |
| | $ | 3,022.1 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 16,161.1 |
| | $ | (2,373.8 | ) | |
| For the year ended December 31, 2016 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Beginning balance January 1, 2016 | | | $ | 14,606.2 |
| | $ | 4,068.4 |
| | $ | 100.6 |
| | $ | 18,775.2 |
| | $ | (1,794.4 | ) |
| Total realized and unrealized gains included in changes in net assets | | 702.6 |
| | 416.0 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 1,119.2 |
| | 5.6 |
| | 311.3 |
| | 242.8 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 554.4 |
| | 15.1 |
|
Purchases(1) | | 1,407.5 |
| | 835.1 |
| | 100.0 |
| | 2,342.6 |
| | — |
| | 786.4 |
| | 1,313.6 |
| | 194.8 |
| | 2,294.8 |
| | (587.5 | ) |
| Sales | | (642.9 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (642.9 | ) | | — |
| | (251.1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (251.1 | ) | | — |
|
Settlements(2) | | — |
| | (204.8 | ) | | — |
| | (204.8 | ) | | 573.8 |
| | — |
| | (2.4 | ) | | — |
| | (2.4 | ) | | 34.7 |
|
| Ending balance December 31, 2015 | | $ | 14,606.2 |
| | $ | 4,068.4 |
| | $ | 100.6 |
| | $ | 18,775.2 |
| | $ | (1,794.4 | ) | |
| Ending balance December 31, 2016 | | | $ | 15,452.8 |
| | $ | 5,622.4 |
| | $ | 295.7 |
| | $ | 21,370.9 |
| | $ | (2,332.1 | ) |
| |
(1) | Includes purchases, contributions for joint ventures, capital expenditures, and lending for loans receivable.receivable and assumption of mortgage loans payable. |
| |
(2) | Includes operating income for real estate joint ventures, net of distributions, and principal payments and extinguishmentsextinguishment of mortgage loans payable. |
The following table shows quantitative information about unobservable inputs related to the Level 3 fair value measurements as of December 31, 2016.2017. |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
| Type | Asset Class | Valuation Technique(s) | Unobservable Inputs | Range (Weighted Average) |
|
| Real Estate Properties and Joint Ventures | Office | Income Approach—Discounted Cash Flow | Discount Rate | 5.5%–8.0% (6.5%) |
| | | Terminal Capitalization Rate | 4.5%–7.0% (5.5%) |
| |
| | Income Approach—Direct Capitalization | Overall Capitalization Rate | 3.8%–7.0% (4.8%) |
| |
| Industrial | Income Approach—Discounted Cash Flow | Discount Rate | 5.5%–8.9% (6.8%) |
| | | Terminal Capitalization Rate | 4.5%–8.3% (5.5%) |
| |
| | Income Approach—Direct Capitalization | Overall Capitalization Rate | 4.0%–7.5% (5.0%) |
| |
| Residential | Income Approach—Discounted Cash Flow | Discount Rate | 5.0%–8.0% (6.1%) |
| | | Terminal Capitalization Rate | 3.5%–6.5% (4.8%) |
| |
| | Income Approach—Direct Capitalization | Overall Capitalization Rate | 3.3%–6.0% (4.3%) |
| |
| Retail | Income Approach—Discounted Cash Flow | Discount Rate | 5.0%–10.5% (6.4%) |
| | | Terminal Capitalization Rate | 4.3%–8.8% (5.2%) |
| |
| | Income Approach—Direct Capitalization | Overall Capitalization Rate | 3.8%–8.8% (4.7%) |
|
| Mortgage Loans Payable | Office and Industrial | Discounted Cash Flow | Loan-to-Value Ratio
| 37.7%–69.5% (45.6%)
|
| | | Equivalency Rate | 3.7%–5.2% (3.9%) |
| |
| | Net Present Value | Loan-to-Value Ratio | 37.7%–69.5% (45.6%) |
| | | Weighted Average Cost of Capital Risk Premium Multiple | 1.2–1.5 (1.3) |
| |
| Residential | Discounted Cash Flow | Loan-to-Value Ratio | 28.1%–64.2% (38.6%) |
| | | Equivalency Rate | 3.3%–3.6% (3.4%) |
| |
| | Net Present Value | Loan-to-Value Ratio | 28.1%–64.2% (38.6%) |
| | | Weighted Average Cost of Capital Risk Premium Multiple | 1.1–1.5 (1.3) |
| |
| Retail | Discounted Cash Flow | Loan-to-Value Ratio | 17.9%–56.0% (32.7%) |
| | | Equivalency Rate | 3.1%–4.4% (3.8%) |
| |
| | Net Present Value | Loan-to-Value Ratio | 17.9%–56.0% (32.7%) |
| | | Weighted Average Cost of Capital Risk Premium Multiple | 1.1–1.4 (1.2) |
|
| Loans Receivable | Office, Retail and Storage | Discounted Cash Flow | Loan-to-Value Ratio | 59.4%-77.3% (75.1%) |
| | | Equivalency Rate | 4.2%-8.3% (6.2%) |
|
The following table shows quantitative information about unobservable inputs related to the Level 3 fair value measurements as of December 31, 2016.
|
| | | | |
| Type | Asset
Class | Valuation
Technique(s) | Unobservable Inputs | Range (Weighted
Average) |
| |
| Real Estate Properties and Joint Ventures | Office | Income Approach—Discounted Cash Flow | Discount Rate | 5.5%–8.3% (6.5%) |
| | | | Terminal Capitalization Rate | 4.3%–7.3% (5.5%) |
| | |
| | | Income Approach—Direct Capitalization | Overall Capitalization Rate | 3.8%–7.0% (4.7%) |
| | |
| | Industrial | Income Approach—Discounted Cash Flow | Discount Rate | 5.7%–8.7% (6.7%) |
| | | | Terminal Capitalization Rate | 4.8%–8.0% (5.6%) |
| | |
| | | Income Approach—Direct Capitalization | Overall Capitalization Rate | 4.0%–7.5% (5.0%) |
| | |
| | Residential | Income Approach—Discounted Cash Flow | Discount Rate | 5.3%–7.3% (6.2%) |
| | | | Terminal Capitalization Rate | 3.8%–6.0% (4.8%) |
| | |
| | | Income Approach—Direct Capitalization | Overall Capitalization Rate | 3.3%–5.5% (4.2%) |
| | |
| | Retail | Income Approach—Discounted Cash Flow | Discount Rate | 5.0%–10.4% (6.4%) |
| | | | Terminal Capitalization Rate | 4.3%–8.5% (5.2%) |
| | |
| | | Income Approach—Direct Capitalization | Overall Capitalization Rate | 3.9%–8.3% (4.7%) |
| |
| Mortgage Loans Payable | Office and Industrial | Discounted Cash Flow | Loan-to-Value Ratio
| 35.7%–71.0% (43.4%)
|
| | | | Equivalency Rate | 3.7%–4.7% (3.9%) |
| | |
| | | Net Present Value | Loan-to-Value Ratio | 35.7%–71.0% (43.4%) |
| | | | Weighted Average Cost of Capital Risk Premium Multiple | 1.2–1.6 (1.3) |
| | |
| | Residential | Discounted Cash Flow | Loan-to-Value Ratio | 29.5%–61.2% (41.4%) |
| | | | Equivalency Rate | 2.9%–3.6% (3.3%) |
| | |
| | | Net Present Value | Loan-to-Value Ratio | 29.5%–61.2% (41.4%) |
| | | | Weighted Average Cost of Capital Risk Premium Multiple | 1.2–1.5 (1.3) |
| | |
| | Retail | Discounted Cash Flow | Loan-to-Value Ratio | 18.3%–51.6% (31.3%) |
| | | | Equivalency Rate | 2.9%–4.0% (3.5%) |
| | |
| | | Net Present Value | Loan-to-Value Ratio | 18.3%–51.6% (31.3%) |
| | | | Weighted Average Cost of Capital Risk Premium Multiple | 1.1–1.3 (1.2) |
| |
| Loans Receivable | Office, Retail and Storage | Discounted Cash Flow | Loan-to-Value Ratio | 55.6%-79.2% (75.8%) |
| | | | Equivalency Rate | 4.2%-8.3% (6.3%) |
| |
Real Estate Properties and Joint Ventures: The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Account’s real estate property and joint venture investments are the selection of certain investment rates (Discount
Rate, Terminal Capitalization Rate, and Overall Capitalization Rate). Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation would result in significantly lower (higher) fair value measurements, respectively.
Mortgage Loans Payable: The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Account’s mortgage loans payable are the loan-to-value ratios and the selection of certain credit spreads and weighted average cost of capital risk premiums. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value, respectively.
Loans Receivable: The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Account’s loans receivable are the loan-to-value ratios and the selection of certain credit spreads. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value, respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 20162017 and 20152016 there were no transfers between Levels 1, 2 or 3.
The amount of total net unrealized gains (losses) included in changes in net assets attributable to the change in net unrealized gains (losses) relating to Level 3 investments and mortgage loans payable using significant unobservable inputs still held as of the reporting date is as follows (in millions):
| | | | | Real Estate Properties | | Real Estate Joint Ventures | | Loans Receivable | | Total Level 3 Investments | | Mortgage Loans Payable | | Real Estate Properties | | Real Estate Joint Ventures | | Loans Receivable | | Total Level 3 Investments | | Mortgage Loans Payable |
| For the year ended December 31, 2017 | | | $ | 185.1 |
| | $ | 125.2 |
| | $ | 1.2 |
| | $ | 311.5 |
| | $ | 15.9 |
|
| For the year ended December 31, 2016 | | $ | 314.2 |
| | $ | 242.4 |
| | $ | 0.3 |
| | $ | 556.9 |
| | $ | 15.1 |
| | $ | 314.2 |
| | $ | 242.4 |
| | $ | 0.3 |
| | $ | 556.9 |
| | $ | 15.1 |
|
| For the year ended December 31, 2015 | | $ | 718.7 |
| | $ | 426.2 |
| | $ | 0.6 |
| | $ | 1,145.5 |
| | $ | 5.6 |
| |
Note 6—Investments in Joint Ventures
The Account owns interests in several real estate properties through joint ventures and receives distributions and allocations of profits and losses from the joint ventures based on the Account’s ownership interest in those investments. Several of these joint ventures have mortgage loans payable collateralized by the properties owned by the aforementioned joint ventures. At December 31, 2016,2017, the Account held investments in joint ventures with ownership interest percentages that ranged from 33%33.3% to 95%97.5%. Certain joint ventures are subject to adjusted distribution percentages when earnings in the investment reach a pre-determined threshold. The fair value of the Account’s equity interest in these joint ventures was $5.6$5.9 billion and $4.1$5.6 billion at December 31, 2017 and 2016, and 2015, respectively. The Account’s most significant joint venture investment is Fashion Show, which represented 3.5% of the Account’s net assets and 3.1% of the Account’s invested assets at December 31, 2016. The Account’s proportionate share of the mortgage loans payable held within the joint venture investments at fair value was $2.1$2.4 billion and $1.6$2.1 billion at December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively. The Account’s share in the outstanding principal of the mortgage loans payable held within the joint venture investments was $2.1$2.4 billion and $1.6$2.1 billion at December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively.
A condensed summary of the financial position and results of operations of the combined joint ventures areis shown below (in millions):
| | | | | December 31, | | December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Assets | | | | | | | | |
| Real estate properties, at fair value | | $ | 13,539.0 |
| | $ | 9,615.7 |
| | $ | 14,240.8 |
| | $ | 13,539.0 |
|
| Other assets | | 316.1 |
| | 256.1 |
| | 337.1 |
| | 316.1 |
|
| Total assets | | $ | 13,855.1 |
| | $ | 9,871.8 |
| | $ | 14,577.9 |
| | $ | 13,855.1 |
|
| Liabilities & Equity | | | | | | | | |
| Mortgage notes payable and other obligations, at fair value | | $ | 3,452.9 |
| | $ | 2,487.5 |
| | $ | 3,995.7 |
| | $ | 3,452.9 |
|
| Other liabilities | | 213.9 |
| | 162.4 |
| | 150.7 |
| | 213.9 |
|
| Total liabilities | | 3,666.8 |
| | 2,649.9 |
| | 4,146.4 |
| | 3,666.8 |
|
| Total equity | | 10,188.3 |
| | 7,221.9 |
| | 10,431.5 |
| | 10,188.3 |
|
| Total liabilities and equity | | $ | 13,855.1 |
| | $ | 9,871.8 |
| | $ | 14,577.9 |
| | $ | 13,855.1 |
|
| | | | | For the years ended December 31, | | Years ended December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Operating Revenue and Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Revenues | | $ | 714.6 |
| | $ | 609.5 |
| | $ | 612.8 |
| | $ | 869.2 |
| | $ | 714.6 |
| | $ | 609.5 |
|
| Expenses | | 365.0 |
| | 318.6 |
| | 315.8 |
| | 426.9 |
| | 365.0 |
| | 318.6 |
|
| Excess of revenues over expenses | | $ | 349.6 |
| | $ | 290.9 |
| | $ | 297.0 |
| | $ | 442.3 |
| | $ | 349.6 |
| | $ | 290.9 |
|
Note 7—Investments in Limited Partnerships
The Account invests in limited partnerships, limited liability companies and private real estate equity investment trusts that own real estate properties and real estate related securities including mezzanine debt. The Account receives distributions from these investments based on the Account’s ownership interest percentage. At December 31, 2016,2017, the Account held ownership interests in fourthree limited partnerships and one limited liability company ranging from 5.3% to 60.0%. As of December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, the fair value of the Account’s ownership interest was $137.5$142.4 million and $144.8$137.5 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2016, two2017, one of the limited partnership investments werewas in dissolution. Colony Realty Partners LP began liquidation in May 2014, with final dissolution anticipated during 2017. Lion Gables Apartment Fund began liquidation in February 2015 and has dissolved all of the Fund’s assets. Final dissolution of the entity is anticipated during 2017.2018.
Transwestern Mezzanine Realty Partners III, LLC (“Transwestern”) may engage in liquidation activities in 20172018 based on the terms of its partnership agreement. The Account may elect to sell or transfer its ownership units by giving notice and acquiring consent from the management committee of Transwestern, which requires approval by a majority of the members. Redemption of the Account’s interest in Transwestern prior to liquidation is prohibited, unless a supermajority of the members approves the redemption request.
Clarion Gables Multi-Family Trust LP allows redemptions with an advanced notice of three months or more. Redemptions are funded using the partnership’s available cash, which may not immediately be in excess of the redemption amount, and may not be sufficient to fund the redemption amount for several months. The general partner has sole discretion in identifying how much cash is available to process redemptions. The partnership allows the Account to sell its interest in the partnership, subject to the consent and approval of the general partner.
Taconic New York City GP Fund, LP prohibits redemptions in the partnership prior to liquidation. Liquidation of the partnership is estimated to begin no earlier than 2024. The partnership allows the Account to sell its interest in the partnership, subject to the consent and approval of the general partner.
Note 8—Mortgage Loans Payable
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Account had outstanding mortgage loans payable secured by the following properties (in millions):
| | | Property | | Interest Rate and Payment Frequency(2) | | Principal Amounts Outstanding as of December 31, | | Maturity | | Interest Rate and Payment Frequency(2) | | Principal Amounts Outstanding as of December 31, | | Maturity |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2017 | | 2016 | |
Charleston Plaza(1)(4)(8) | | 5.60% paid monthly | | $ | — |
| | $ | 34.7 |
| | September 11, 2016 | |
The Legend at Kierland(4)(5) | | 4.97% paid monthly | | 21.8 |
| | 21.8 |
| | August 1, 2017 | | 4.97% paid monthly | | $ | — |
| | $ | 21.8 |
| | August 1, 2017 |
The Tradition at Kierland(4)(5) | | 4.97% paid monthly | | 25.8 |
| | 25.8 |
| | August 1, 2017 | | 4.97% paid monthly | | — |
| | 25.8 |
| | August 1, 2017 |
Mass Court(4) | | 2.88% paid monthly | | 92.6 |
| | 92.6 |
| | September 1, 2019 | |
Mass Court(1)(4) | | | 2.88% paid monthly | | 92.1 |
| | 92.6 |
| | September 1, 2019 |
Red Canyon at Palomino Park(4)(6) | | 5.34% paid monthly | | 27.1 |
| | 27.1 |
| | August 1, 2020 | | 5.34% paid monthly | | 27.1 |
| | 27.1 |
| | August 1, 2020 |
Green River at Palomino Park(4)(6) | | 5.34% paid monthly | | 33.2 |
| | 33.2 |
| | August 1, 2020 | | 5.34% paid monthly | | 33.2 |
| | 33.2 |
| | August 1, 2020 |
Blue Ridge at Palomino Park(4)(6) | | 5.34% paid monthly | | 33.4 |
| | 33.4 |
| | August 1, 2020 | | 5.34% paid monthly | | 33.4 |
| | 33.4 |
| | August 1, 2020 |
Ashford Meadows(4) | | 5.17% paid monthly | | 44.6 |
| | 44.6 |
| | August 1, 2020 | |
Ashford Meadows Apartments(4) | | | 5.17% paid monthly | | 44.6 |
| | 44.6 |
| | August 1, 2020 |
The Knoll(1)(4) | | | 3.98% paid monthly | | 17.5 |
| | — |
| | December 5, 2020 |
The Corner(4) | | 4.66% paid monthly | | 105.0 |
| | 105.0 |
| | June 1, 2021 | | 4.66% paid monthly | | 105.0 |
| | 105.0 |
| | June 1, 2021 |
The Palatine(4) | | 4.25% paid monthly | | 80.0 |
| | 80.0 |
| | January 10, 2022 | |
The Forum at Carlsbad(4) | | 4.25% paid monthly | | 90.0 |
| | 90.0 |
| | March 1, 2022 | |
The Palatine(1)(4) | | | 4.25% paid monthly | | 78.8 |
| | 80.0 |
| | January 10, 2022 |
The Forum at Carlsbad(1)(4) | | | 4.25% paid monthly | | 88.9 |
| | 90.0 |
| | March 1, 2022 |
The Colorado(4) | | 3.69% paid monthly | | 91.7 |
| | 91.7 |
| | November 1, 2022 | | 3.69% paid monthly | | 91.7 |
| | 91.7 |
| | November 1, 2022 |
The Legacy at Westwood(4) | | 3.69% paid monthly | | 46.7 |
| | 46.7 |
| | November 1, 2022 | |
Regents Court(4) | | 3.69% paid monthly | | 39.6 |
| | 39.6 |
| | November 1, 2022 | |
The Legacy at Westwood(1)(4) | | | 3.69% paid monthly | | 46.7 |
| | 46.7 |
| | November 1, 2022 |
Regents Court(1)(4) | | | 3.69% paid monthly | | 39.6 |
| | 39.6 |
| | November 1, 2022 |
The Caruth(4)(8) | | 3.69% paid monthly | | 45.0 |
| | 45.0 |
| | November 1, 2022 | | 3.69% paid monthly | | — |
| | 45.0 |
| | November 1, 2022 |
Fourth & Madison(4) | | 3.75% paid monthly | | 200.0 |
| | 200.0 |
| | June 1, 2023 | | 3.75% paid monthly | | 200.0 |
| | 200.0 |
| | June 1, 2023 |
| 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue | | 3.70% paid monthly | | 330.0 |
| | 330.0 |
| | June 1, 2023 | | 3.70% paid monthly | | 330.0 |
| | 330.0 |
| | June 1, 2023 |
1401 H Street NW(4) | | 3.65% paid monthly | | 115.0 |
| | 115.0 |
| | November 5, 2024 | | 3.65% paid monthly | | 115.0 |
| | 115.0 |
| | November 5, 2024 |
32 South State Street(4) | | 4.48% paid monthly | | 24.0 |
| | — |
| | June 6, 2025 | | 4.48% paid monthly | | 24.0 |
| | 24.0 |
| | June 6, 2025 |
780 Third Avenue(4) | | 3.55% paid monthly | | 150.0 |
| | 150.0 |
| | August 1, 2025 | | 3.55% paid monthly | | 150.0 |
| | 150.0 |
| | August 1, 2025 |
780 Third Avenue(4) | | 3.55% paid monthly | | 20.0 |
| | 20.0 |
| | August 1, 2025 | | 3.55% paid monthly | | 20.0 |
| | 20.0 |
| | August 1, 2025 |
701 Brickell Avenue(4) | | 3.66% paid monthly | | 184.0 |
| | — |
| | April 1, 2026 | | 3.66% paid monthly | | 184.0 |
| | 184.0 |
| | April 1, 2026 |
55 Second Street(4)(7) | | 3.74% paid monthly | | 137.5 |
| | 137.5 |
| | October 1, 2026 | | 3.74% paid monthly | | 137.5 |
| | 137.5 |
| | October 1, 2026 |
| 1900 K Street, NW | | 3.93% paid monthly | | 163.0 |
| | — |
| | April 1, 2028 | | 3.93% paid monthly | | 163.0 |
| | 163.0 |
| | April 1, 2028 |
501 Boylston Street(4) | | 3.70% paid monthly | | 216.5 |
| | — |
| | April 1, 2028 | | 3.70% paid monthly | | 216.5 |
| | 216.5 |
| | April 1, 2028 |
| Total Principal Outstanding | | | | 2,316.5 |
| | 1,763.7 |
| | | | | | 2,238.6 |
| | 2,316.5 |
| | |
Fair Value Adjustment(3) | | | | 15.6 |
| | 30.7 |
| | | | | | (0.3 | ) | | 15.6 |
| | |
| Total mortgage loans payable | | | | $ | 2,332.1 |
| | $ | 1,794.4 |
| | | | | | $ | 2,238.3 |
| | $ | 2,332.1 |
| | |
| |
(1) | The mortgage is adjusted monthly for principal payments. |
| |
(2) | Interest rates are fixed. All mortgages held as of December 31, 2016 are interest only; however, someSome mortgages held by the Account are structured to begin principal and interest payments after an initial interest only period. |
| |
(3) | The fair value adjustment consists of the difference (positive or negative) between the principal amount of the outstanding debt and the fair value of the outstanding debt. See Note 1—Organization and Significant Accounting Policies. |
| |
(4) | These properties are each owned by separate wholly-owned subsidiaries of TIAA for benefit of the Account. The assets and credit of each of these borrowings entities are not available to satisfy the debts and other obligations of the Account or any other entity or person other than such borrowing entity. |
| |
(5) | Represents mortgageMortgage loans on thesethe individual properties which are held withinin the Kierland Apartment portfolio.Portfolio were paid off on May 1, 2017. |
| |
(6) | Represents mortgage loans on these individual properties which are held within the Palomino Park portfolio. |
| |
(7) | This mortgage is comprised of three individual loans, all with equal recourse, interest and maturity. The principal balances by loan are $79.0 million, $45.0 million, and $13.5 million. |
| |
(8) | On July 11, 2016,This mortgage loan was assumed by the outstanding principalPurchaser of the mortgageproperty, which was paid off by the Account.sold on November 13, 2017. |
Principal payment schedule on mortgage loans payable as of December 31, 20162017 was as follows (in millions):
| | | | Amount | Amount |
| 2017 | $ | 50.8 |
| |
| 2018 | 13.8 |
| $ | 13.7 |
|
| 2019 | 107.4 |
| 107.2 |
|
| 2020 | 156.2 |
| 171.7 |
|
| 2021 | 125.9 |
| 125.0 |
|
| 2022 | | 335.7 |
|
| Thereafter | 1,862.4 |
| 1,485.3 |
|
| Total maturities | $ | 2,316.5 |
| $ | 2,238.6 |
|
Note 9—Financial Highlights
Selected condensed financial information for an Accumulation Unit of the Account is presented below. Per Accumulation Unit data is calculated on average units outstanding.
| | | | | Years Ended December 31, | | Years ended December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Per Accumulation Unit Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Rental income | | $ | 16.433 |
| | $ | 15.538 |
| | $ | 15.862 |
| | $ | 15.313 |
| | $ | 16.345 |
| | $ | 17.132 |
| | $ | 16.433 |
| | $ | 15.538 |
| | $ | 15.862 |
| | $ | 15.313 |
|
| Real estate property level expenses and taxes | | 7.534 |
| | 7.319 |
| | 7.788 |
| | 8.112 |
| | 9.059 |
| | 7.722 |
| | 7.534 |
| | 7.319 |
| | 7.788 |
| | 8.112 |
|
| Real estate income, net | | 8.899 |
| | 8.219 |
| | 8.074 |
| | 7.201 |
| | 7.286 |
| | 9.410 |
| | 8.899 |
| | 8.219 |
| | 8.074 |
| | 7.201 |
|
| Other income | | 3.594 |
| | 3.342 |
| | 3.459 |
| | 2.759 |
| | 2.178 |
| | 4.762 |
| | 3.594 |
| | 3.342 |
| | 3.459 |
| | 2.759 |
|
| Total income | | 12.493 |
| | 11.561 |
| | 11.533 |
| | 9.960 |
| | 9.464 |
| | 14.172 |
| | 12.493 |
| | 11.561 |
| | 11.533 |
| | 9.960 |
|
Expense charges(1) | | 3.290 |
| | 3.092 |
| | 2.880 |
| | 2.672 |
| | 2.562 |
| | 3.318 |
| | 3.290 |
| | 3.092 |
| | 2.880 |
| | 2.672 |
|
| Investment income, net | | 9.203 |
| | 8.469 |
| | 8.653 |
| | 7.288 |
| | 6.902 |
| | 10.854 |
| | 9.203 |
| | 8.469 |
| | 8.653 |
| | 7.288 |
|
| Net realized and unrealized gain on investments and mortgage loans payable | | 9.660 |
| | 18.911 |
| | 27.868 |
| | 19.015 |
| | 18.013 |
| | 5.839 |
| | 9.660 |
| | 18.911 |
| | 27.868 |
| | 19.015 |
|
| Net increase in Accumulation Unit Value | | 18.863 |
| | 27.380 |
| | 36.521 |
| | 26.303 |
| | 24.915 |
| | 16.693 |
| | 18.863 |
| | 27.380 |
| | 36.521 |
| | 26.303 |
|
| Accumulation Unit Value: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Beginning of period | | 362.773 |
| | 335.393 |
| | 298.872 |
| | 272.569 |
| | 247.654 |
| | 381.636 |
| | 362.773 |
| | 335.393 |
| | 298.872 |
| | 272.569 |
|
| End of period | | $ | 381.636 |
| | $ | 362.773 |
| | $ | 335.393 |
| | $ | 298.872 |
| | $ | 272.569 |
| | $ | 398.329 |
| | $ | 381.636 |
| | $ | 362.773 |
| | $ | 335.393 |
| | $ | 298.872 |
|
| Total return | | 5.20 | % | | 8.16 | % | | 12.22 | % | | 9.65 | % | | 10.06 | % | | 4.37 | % | | 5.20 | % | | 8.16 | % | | 12.22 | % | | 9.65 | % |
| Ratios to Average net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(1) | | 0.86 | % | | 0.86 | % | | 0.89 | % | | 0.92 | % | | 0.95 | % | | 0.83 | % | | 0.86 | % | | 0.86 | % | | 0.89 | % | | 0.92 | % |
| Investment income, net | | 2.41 | % | | 2.37 | % | | 2.68 | % | | 2.50 | % | | 2.55 | % | | 2.72 | % | | 2.41 | % | | 2.37 | % | | 2.68 | % | | 2.50 | % |
| Portfolio turnover rate: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Real estate properties(2) | | 1.3 | % | | 5.7 | % | | 6.5 | % | | 2.1 | % | | 10.2 | % | | 2.7 | % | | 1.3 | % | | 5.7 | % | | 6.5 | % | | 2.1 | % |
Marketable securities(3) | | 3.5 | % | | 10.0 | % | | 15.9 | % | | 8.4 | % | | 21.9 | % | | 5.7 | % | | 3.5 | % | | 10.0 | % | | 15.9 | % | | 8.4 | % |
| Accumulation Units outstanding at end of period (in millions): | | 62.4 |
| | 60.4 |
| | 57.9 |
| | 55.3 |
| | 53.3 |
| | 61.3 |
| | 62.4 |
| | 60.4 |
| | 57.9 |
| | 55.3 |
|
| Net assets end of period (in millions) | | $ | 24,304.7 |
| | $ | 22,360.0 |
| | $ | 19,829.0 |
| | $ | 16,907.9 |
| | $ | 14,861.1 |
| | $ | 24,942.6 |
| | $ | 24,304.7 |
| | $ | 22,360.0 |
| | $ | 19,829.0 |
| | $ | 16,907.9 |
|
| |
(1) | Expense charges per Accumulation Unit and the Ratio of Expenses to average net assets reflect the year to date Account level expenses and exclude real estate property level expenses which are included in real estate income, net. |
| |
(2) | Real estate investment portfolio turnover rate is calculated by dividing the lesser of purchases or sales of real estate property investments (including contributions to, or return of capital distributions received from, existing joint venture and limited partnership investments) by the average value of the portfolio of real estate investments held during the period. |
| |
(3) | Marketable securities portfolio turnover rate is calculated by dividing the lesser of purchases or sales of securities, excluding securities having maturity dates at acquisition of one year or less, by the average value of the portfolio securities held during the period. |
Note 10—Accumulation Units
Changes in the number of Accumulation Units outstanding were as follows (in millions):
| | | | | For the years ended December 31, | | Years ended December 31, |
| | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Beginning of period | | 60.4 |
| | 57.9 |
| | 55.3 |
| | 62.4 |
| | 60.4 |
| | 57.9 |
|
| Credited for premiums | | 8.2 |
| | 8.1 |
| | 7.7 |
| | 6.6 |
| | 8.2 |
| | 8.1 |
|
| Annuity, other periodic payments, withdrawals and death benefits | | (6.2 | ) | | (5.6 | ) | | (5.1 | ) | | (7.7 | ) | | (6.2 | ) | | (5.6 | ) |
| End of period | | 62.4 |
| | 60.4 |
| | 57.9 |
| | 61.3 |
| | 62.4 |
| | 60.4 |
|
Note 11—Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments—The Account had $39.0$32.0 million and $45.0$39.0 million of outstanding immediately callable commitments to purchase additional interests in its limited partnership investments as of December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively. The commitment at December 31, 20162017 is related to the Taconic New York City GP Fund, LP, in which the Account has entered into an agreement to provide funding. As of December 31, 2016, $6.02017, $13.0 million of the original $45.0 million commitment has been funded. Once the remaining commitment is funded, the Account anticipates holding a 60%-90% - 90% interest in the fund.
The Account has committed a total of $38.8$47.6 million and $46.1$38.8 million as of December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively, to various tenants for tenant improvements and leasing inducements.
Contingencies—In the normal course of business, the Account may be named, from time to time, as a defendantor may be involved in various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions and other litigation.
The Account establishes an accrual for all litigation and regulatory matters when it believes it is partyprobable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Once established, accruals are adjusted, as appropriate, in light of additional information. The amount of loss ultimately incurred in relation to various claims and routine litigation arising inthose matters may be higher or lower than the ordinary courseamounts accrued for those matters.
As of business. Managementthe date of this annual report, management of the Account does not believe that the results of any such claims or litigation, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material effect on the Account’s business, financial position or results of operations.
Note 12—Securities Lending
The Account may lend securities to qualified borrowers to earn additional income. The Account receives cash collateral against the loaned securities and maintains cash collateral in an amount not less than 100% of the market value of loaned securities during the period of the loan; any additional collateral required due to changes in security values is delivered to the Account the next business day. Cash collateral received by the Account is invested exclusively in an interest-bearing deposit account. The value of the loaned securities and the liability to return the cash collateral received are reflected in the consolidated statementsAccount's Consolidated Statements of assetsAssets and liabilities.Liabilities. As of December 31, 2016,2017, securities lending transactions are for real-estate related equity securities, and the resulting loans are continuous, can be recalled at any time, and have no set maturity. Securities lending income recognized by the Account consists of interest earned on cash collateral and lending fees, net of any rebates to the borrower and compensation to the agent. Such income is reflected within interest income on the consolidated statementsAccount's Consolidated Statements of operations.Operations. In lending its securities, the Account bears the market risk with respect to the investment of collateral and the risk that the agent may default on its contractual obligations to the Account. The agent bears the risk that the borrower may default on its obligation to return the loaned securities as the agent is contractually obligated to indemnify the Account if at the time of a default by a borrower some or all of the loan securities have not been returned.
Note 13—Subsequent Events
Purchases
30700 Russell Ranch—Westlake Village, CA
On January 4, 2018, the Account purchased an office property located in Westlake Village, California for $32.8 million.
Carrington Park—Plano, TX
On February 22, 2018, the Account purchased an apartment property located in Plano, Texas for $64.2 million.
Churchill on the Park—Dallas, TX
On March 1, 2018, the Account purchased an apartment property located in Dallas, Texas for $71.2 million.
Sales
Urban Centre—Tampa, FL
On March 8, 2018, the Account sold an office property located in Tampa, Florida for a net sales price of $141.1 million, realizing a loss of $12.1 million from the sale, the majority of which has been previously recognized as unrealized losses in the Account’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Account’s cost basis in the property at the date of the sale was $153.2 million.
Loans Receivable
Aspen Lake Office Portfolio —Austin, TX
On March 2, 2018, the Account entered into a $20.0 million mezzanine loan receivable position secured by Borrower's ownership interest in Aspen Lake Office Portfolio. The loan has an interest rate of 8.25% and is interest only through maturity. The loan matures on March 10, 2028.
Financings
Storage Portfolio I—Various, U.S.A.
On February 2, 2018, Storage Portfolio I, LLC joint venture investment, in which the Account holds a 66.02% interest, refinanced a mortgage loan that is secured with a portfolio of storage properties located throughout the United States.The mortgage loan now has an outstanding principal balance of $151.2 million. The debt has an interest rate of 4.5325%, maturing March 1, 2028 and is interest only.
Circa Green Lake—Seattle, WA
On February 21, 2018, the Account entered into a new mortgage loan with a principal amount of $52.0 million, secured by an apartment property investment located in Seattle, Washington. The debt has an interest rate of 3.710%, maturing March 5, 2025 and is interest only.
Union - South Lake Union—Seattle, WA
On February 21, 2018, the Account entered into a new mortgage loan with a principal amount of $57.0 million, secured by an apartment property investment located in Seattle, Washington. The debt has an interest rate of 3.660%, maturing March 5, 2025 and is interest only.
99 High Street—Boston, MA
On February 22, 2018, the Account entered into a new mortgage loan with a principal amount of $277.0 million, secured by an office property investment located in Boston, Massachusetts. The debt has an interest rate of 3.900%, maturing March 1, 2030 and is interest only.
Marketable Securities
On February 22, 2018, the Account purchased $100.0 million of real estate-related securities.
Other
Storage Portfolio I—Various, U.S.A.
On February 2, 2018, the Account restructured its Storage Portfolio I, LLC joint venture, which holds a portfolio of storage properties across the United States, reducing the Account's interest in the joint venture to 66.02%.
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES—58.0%57.9% and 60.5%58.0%
| | | Location/Description | | Type | | Fair Value at December 31, | | Type | | Fair Value at December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Arizona: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Camelback Center | | Office | | $ | 56.4 |
| | $ | 51.1 |
| | | Office | | $ | 59.8 |
| | $ | 56.4 |
| |
| Kierland Apartment Portfolio | | Apartments | | 127.9 |
| (1) | | 119.7 |
| (1) | | Apartments | | — |
| | 127.9 |
| (1) |
| California: | | | | | | | | | | |
| 3 Hutton Centre Drive | | Office | | — |
| | 57.1 |
| | |
| 55 Second Street | | Office | | 335.0 |
| (1) | | 335.2 |
| (1) | | Office | | 355.5 |
| (1) | | 335.0 |
| (1) |
| 88 Kearny Street | | Office | | 172.3 |
| | 165.4 |
| | | Office | | 174.2 |
| | 172.3 |
| |
| 200 Middlefield Road | | Office | | 60.5 |
| | 55.5 |
| | | Office | | 61.4 |
| | 60.5 |
| |
| Allure at Camarillo | | | Apartments | | 59.6 |
| | — |
| |
| BLVD63 | | Apartments | | 157.0 |
| | — |
| | | Apartments | | 162.1 |
| | 157.0 |
| |
| Bridgepointe Shopping Center | | | Retail | | 124.5 |
| | — |
| |
| Castro Station | | Office | | 158.2 |
| | 150.0 |
| | | Office | | 169.0 |
| | 158.2 |
| |
| Centre Pointe and Valley View | | Industrial | | 42.8 |
| | 41.3 |
| | | Industrial | | 47.8 |
| | 42.8 |
| |
| Cerritos Industrial Park | | Industrial | | 126.3 |
| | 108.7 |
| | | Industrial | | 142.0 |
| | 126.3 |
| |
| Charleston Plaza | | Retail | | 92.0 |
| | 88.0 |
| (1) | | Retail | | 93.0 |
| | 92.0 |
| |
| Frontera Industrial Business Park | | | Industrial | | 56.4 |
| | — |
| |
| Great West Industrial Portfolio | | Industrial | | 166.1 |
| | 158.3 |
| | | Industrial | | 167.0 |
| | 166.1 |
| |
| Holly Street Village | | Apartments | | 146.0 |
| | 130.7 |
| | | Apartments | | 148.0 |
| | 146.0 |
| |
| Larkspur Courts | | Apartments | | 140.5 |
| | 135.9 |
| | | Apartments | | 143.7 |
| | 140.5 |
| |
| Northern CA RA Industrial Portfolio | | Industrial | | 76.7 |
| (6) | | 69.5 |
| | | Industrial | | 87.4 |
| | 76.7 |
| |
| Northpark Village Square | | Retail | | — |
| | 47.6 |
| | |
| Oakmont IE West Portfolio | | Industrial | | 82.7 |
| | 76.2 |
| | | Industrial | | 87.6 |
| | 82.7 |
| |
| Oceano at Warner Center | | Apartments | | 88.3 |
| | 82.5 |
| | | Apartments | | 89.0 |
| | 88.3 |
| |
| Ontario Industrial Portfolio | | Industrial | | 438.0 |
| | 421.6 |
| | | Industrial | | 398.6 |
| (11) | | 438.0 |
| |
| Ontario Mills Industrial Portfolio | | Industrial | | 52.0 |
| | 48.6 |
| | | Industrial | | 58.5 |
| | 52.0 |
| |
| Pacific Plaza | | Office | | 115.0 |
| | 94.7 |
| | | Office | | 115.2 |
| | 115.0 |
| |
| Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Portfolio | | Industrial | | 174.2 |
| | 166.1 |
| | | Industrial | | 71.9 |
| (11) | | 174.2 |
| |
| Regents Court | | Apartments | | 89.9 |
| (1) | | 87.1 |
| (1) | | Apartments | | 99.1 |
| (1) | | 89.9 |
| (1) |
| Southern CA RA Industrial Portfolio | | Industrial | | 135.0 |
| | 119.3 |
| | | Industrial | | 138.0 |
| | 135.0 |
| |
| Stella | | Apartments | | 173.1 |
| | 170.8 |
| | | Apartments | | 179.7 |
| | 173.1 |
| |
| Stevenson Point | | Industrial | | 49.3 |
| | 41.6 |
| | | Industrial | | 50.9 |
| | 49.3 |
| |
| The Forum at Carlsbad | | Retail | | 221.5 |
| (1) | | 215.0 |
| (1) | | Retail | | 221.0 |
| (1) | | 221.5 |
| (1) |
| The Legacy at Westwood | | Apartments | | 142.1 |
| (1) | | 141.4 |
| (1) | | Apartments | | 143.0 |
| (1) | | 142.1 |
| (1) |
| Township Apartments | | Apartments | | 89.6 |
| | 88.4 |
| | | Apartments | | 89.8 |
| | 89.6 |
| |
| West Lake North Business Park | | Office | | 60.0 |
| | 54.4 |
| | | Office | | 60.3 |
| | 60.0 |
| |
| Westcreek | | Apartments | | 48.2 |
| | 45.1 |
| | | Apartments | | 51.4 |
| | 48.2 |
| |
| Westwood Marketplace | | Retail | | 125.0 |
| | 125.3 |
| | | Retail | | 131.9 |
| | 125.0 |
| |
| Wilshire Rodeo Plaza | | Office | | 320.7 |
| | 302.4 |
| | | Office | | 327.8 |
| | 320.7 |
| |
| Colorado: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Palomino Park | | Apartments | | 314.1 |
| (1) | | 302.6 |
| (1) | | Apartments | | 329.7 |
| (1) | | 314.1 |
| (1) |
| South Denver Marketplace | | Retail | | 73.0 |
| | 70.8 |
| | | Retail | | 72.7 |
| | 73.0 |
| |
| Connecticut: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Wilton Woods Corporate Campus | | Office | | 141.9 |
| | 141.3 |
| | | Office | | 133.0 |
| | 141.9 |
| |
| Florida: | | | | | | | | | | |
| 701 Brickell Avenue | | Office | | 380.7 |
| (1) | | 371.0 |
| | | Office | | 368.5 |
| (1) | | 380.7 |
| (1) |
| Broward Industrial Portfolio | | | Industrial | | 54.2 |
| | — |
| |
| Casa Palma | | Apartments | | 97.0 |
| | 92.7 |
| | | Apartments | | 95.0 |
| | 97.0 |
| |
| Orion on Orpington | | | Apartments | | 44.4 |
| | — |
| |
| Publix at Weston Commons | | Retail | | 73.0 |
| | 68.2 |
| | | Retail | | 74.8 |
| | 73.0 |
| |
| Seneca Industrial Park | | Industrial | | 102.7 |
| | 87.9 |
| | | Industrial | | 108.8 |
| | 102.7 |
| |
| South Florida Apartment Portfolio | | Apartments | | 104.1 |
| | 93.1 |
| | | Apartments | | 105.1 |
| | 104.1 |
| |
| The Manor Apartments | | Apartments | | 53.6 |
| | 54.0 |
| | | Apartments | | 52.6 |
| | 53.6 |
| |
| The Manor at Flagler Village | | Apartments | | 150.8 |
| | 150.5 |
| | | Apartments | | 148.1 |
| | 150.8 |
| |
| The Residences at the Village of Merrick Park | | Apartments | | 74.1 |
| | 71.7 |
| | |
| Urban Centre | | Office | | 121.4 |
| | 122.3 |
| | |
| Weston Business Center | | Industrial | | 92.7 |
| | 88.8 |
| | |
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
| | | Location/Description | | Type | | Fair Value at December 31, | | Type | | Fair Value at December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| The Residences at the Village of Merrick Park | | | Apartments | | $ | 76.0 |
| | $ | 74.1 |
| |
| Urban Centre | | | Office | | 143.3 |
| | 121.4 |
| |
| Weston Business Center | | | Industrial | | 92.8 |
| | 92.7 |
| |
| Georgia: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Atlanta Industrial Portfolio | | Industrial | | $ | 62.8 |
| | $ | 58.5 |
| | | Industrial | | 32.4 |
| (6) | | 62.8 |
| |
| Shawnee Ridge Industrial Portfolio | | Industrial | | 86.7 |
| | 81.4 |
| | | Industrial | | 91.1 |
| | 86.7 |
| |
| Illinois: | | | | | | | | | | |
| 32 State Street | | Retail | | 46.5 |
| (1) | | — |
| | | Retail | | 48.3 |
| (1) | | 46.5 |
| (1) |
| 803 Corday | | | Apartments | | 94.5 |
| | | |
| Chicago Caleast Industrial Portfolio | | Industrial | | 81.8 |
| | 73.1 |
| | | Industrial | | 80.5 |
| | 81.8 |
| |
| Chicago Industrial Portfolio | | Industrial | | 85.5 |
| | 84.1 |
| | | Industrial | | 100.3 |
| | 85.5 |
| |
| Parkview Plaza | | Office | | — |
| | 51.2 |
| | |
| Maryland: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Landover Logistics Center | | Industrial | | 39.8 |
| | 38.3 |
| | | Industrial | | 43.4 |
| | 39.8 |
| |
| The Shops at Wisconsin Place | | Retail | | 92.8 |
| | 103.5 |
| | | Retail | | 90.0 |
| | 92.8 |
| |
| Massachusetts: | | | | | | | | | | |
| 99 High Street | | Office | | 514.1 |
| | 506.4 |
| | | Office | | 502.1 |
| | 514.1 |
| |
| 501 Boylston Street | | Office | | 490.3 |
| (1) | | 434.3 |
| | | Office | | 505.2 |
| (1) | | 490.3 |
| (1) |
| Fort Point Creative Exchange Portfolio | | Office | | 223.0 |
| | — |
| | | Office | | 223.1 |
| | 223.0 |
| |
| Northeast RA Industrial Portfolio | | Industrial | | 41.3 |
| | 39.6 |
| | | Industrial | | 40.9 |
| | 41.3 |
| |
| Residence at Rivers Edge | | Apartments | | — |
| | 87.5 |
| | |
| One Beeman Road | | | Industrial | | 33.8 |
| | — |
| |
| Minnesota: | | | | | | |
| The Bridges | | | Apartments | | 62.4 |
| | — |
| |
| The Knoll | | | Apartments | | 34.0 |
| (1) | | — |
| |
| New Jersey: | | | | | | | | | | |
| 200 Milik Street | | Industrial | | 51.2 |
| | 50.1 |
| | | Industrial | | 53.1 |
| | 51.2 |
| |
| Marketfair | | Retail | | 104.2 |
| | 106.5 |
| | | Retail | | 102.9 |
| | 104.2 |
| |
Amazon Distribution Center(10) | | Industrial | | 101.0 |
| | 81.9 |
| | |
| Amazon Distribution Center | | | Industrial | | 110.0 |
| | 101.0 |
| |
| South River Road Industrial | | Industrial | | 71.9 |
| | 68.3 |
| | | Industrial | | 87.8 |
| | 71.9 |
| |
| New York: | | | | | | | | | | |
| 21 Penn Plaza | | Office | | 275.2 |
| | 270.1 |
| | | Office | | 261.2 |
| | 275.2 |
| |
| 250 North 10th Street | | Apartments | | 162.0 |
| | 171.0 |
| | | Apartments | | 163.1 |
| | 162.0 |
| |
| 425 Park Avenue | | Ground Lease | | 450.0 |
| | 440.0 |
| | | Ground Lease | | 457.0 |
| | 450.0 |
| |
| 430 West 15th Street | | Office | | 116.1 |
| | — |
| | | Office | | 145.8 |
| | 116.1 |
| |
| 780 Third Avenue | | Office | | 425.0 |
| (1) | | 420.6 |
| (1) | | Office | | 427.0 |
| (1) | | 425.0 |
| (1) |
| 837 Washington Street | | Office | | 215.0 |
| | 205.0 |
| | | Office | | 210.0 |
| | 215.0 |
| |
| The Colorado | | Apartments | | 258.1 |
| (1) | | 263.6 |
| (1) | | Apartments | | 256.2 |
| (1) | | 258.1 |
| (1) |
| The Corner | | Apartments | | 250.0 |
| (1) | | 265.0 |
| (1) | | Apartments | | 251.0 |
| (1) | | 250.0 |
| (1) |
| Oregon: | | | | | | | | | | |
| The Cordelia | | Apartments | | 50.0 |
| | 48.5 |
| | | Apartments | | 49.0 |
| | 50.0 |
| |
| Pennsylvania: | | | | | | | | | | |
| 1619 Walnut Street | | Retail | | 23.4 |
| | 23.2 |
| | | Retail | | 24.1 |
| | 23.4 |
| |
| The Pepper Building | | Apartments | | 52.9 |
| | 53.2 |
| | | Apartments | | — |
| | 52.9 |
| |
| South Carolina: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Greene Crossing | | Apartments | | 65.8 |
| | — |
| | | Apartments | | 67.2 |
| | 65.8 |
| |
| Tennessee: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Southside at McEwen | | Retail | | 48.8 |
| | 47.6 |
| | | Retail | | 48.2 |
| | 48.8 |
| |
| Texas: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Beltway North Commerce Center | | Industrial | | 19.5 |
| | 23.4 |
| | | Industrial | | 19.3 |
| | 19.5 |
| |
| Cliffs at Barton Creek | | Apartments | | 45.8 |
| | 46.4 |
| | | Apartments | | 45.9 |
| | 45.8 |
| |
| Dallas Industrial Portfolio | | | Industrial | | 213.2 |
| | 201.3 |
| |
| Houston Apartment Portfolio | | | Apartments | | 158.7 |
| | 159.3 |
| |
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
| | | Location/Description | | Type | | Fair Value at December 31, | | Type | | Fair Value at December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Dallas Industrial Portfolio | | Industrial | | $ | 201.3 |
| | $ | 193.2 |
| | |
| Houston Apartment Portfolio | | Apartments | | 159.3 |
| | 175.5 |
| | |
| Lincoln Centre | | Office | | 347.0 |
| | 315.9 |
| | | Office | | $ | 358.0 |
| | $ | 347.0 |
| |
| Northwest Houston Industrial Portfolio | | Industrial | | 68.2 |
| | 68.8 |
| | | Industrial | | 70.7 |
| | 68.2 |
| |
| Park 10 Distribution | | Industrial | | 11.3 |
| | 12.6 |
| | | Industrial | | 10.3 |
| | 11.3 |
| |
| Pinnacle Industrial Portfolio | | Industrial | | 52.8 |
| | 46.7 |
| | | Industrial | | 53.3 |
| | 52.8 |
| |
| Pinto Business Park | | Industrial | | 134.2 |
| | 93.0 |
| | | Industrial | | 131.6 |
| | 134.2 |
| |
| The Caruth | | Apartments | | 84.3 |
| (1) | | 81.8 |
| (1) | | Apartments | | — |
| | 84.3 |
| (1) |
| The Maroneal | | Apartments | | 52.1 |
| | 57.0 |
| | | Apartments | | 56.6 |
| | 52.1 |
| |
| Virginia: | | | | | | | | | | |
| 8270 Greensboro Drive | | Office | | 47.6 |
| | 48.1 |
| | | Office | | 50.3 |
| | 47.6 |
| |
| Ashford Meadows Apartments | | Apartments | | 107.2 |
| (1) | | 106.0 |
| (1) | | Apartments | | 107.3 |
| (1) | | 107.2 |
| (1) |
| Plaza America | | Retail | | 109.0 |
| | 106.0 |
| | | Retail | | 117.0 |
| | 109.0 |
| |
| The Ellipse at Ballston | | Office | | 79.8 |
| | 87.5 |
| | | Office | | 83.7 |
| | 79.8 |
| |
| The Palatine | | Apartments | | 130.9 |
| (1) | | 126.9 |
| (1) | | Apartments | | 123.2 |
| (1) | | 130.9 |
| (1) |
| Washington: | | | | | | | | |
| Circa Green Lake | | Apartments | | 92.5 |
| | 87.9 |
| | | Apartments | | 97.5 |
| | 92.5 |
| |
| Fourth and Madison | | Office | | 521.0 |
| (1) | | 489.3 |
| (1) | | Office | | 530.0 |
| (1) | | 521.0 |
| (1) |
| Millennium Corporate Park | | Office | | 190.1 |
| | 189.5 |
| | | Office | | 184.1 |
| | 190.1 |
| |
| Northwest RA Industrial Portfolio | | Industrial | | 31.7 |
| | 29.5 |
| | | Industrial | | 38.5 |
| | 31.7 |
| |
| Pacific Corporate Park | | Industrial | | 42.0 |
| | 36.9 |
| | | Industrial | | 45.5 |
| | 42.0 |
| |
| Prescott Wallingford Apartments | | Apartments | | 58.8 |
| | 58.0 |
| | | Apartments | | 62.0 |
| | 58.8 |
| |
| Rainier Corporate Park | | Industrial | | 104.0 |
| | 96.9 |
| | | Industrial | | 123.7 |
| | 104.0 |
| |
| Regal Logistics Campus | | Industrial | | 83.1 |
| | 78.2 |
| | | Industrial | | 100.0 |
| | 83.1 |
| |
| Union - South Lake Union | | Apartments | | 105.3 |
| | 105.0 |
| | | Apartments | | 111.0 |
| | 105.3 |
| |
| Washington D.C.: | | | | | | | | |
| 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue | | Office | | 810.0 |
| (1) | | 805.8 |
| (1) | | Office | | 785.0 |
| (1) | | 810.0 |
| (1) |
| 1401 H Street, NW | | Office | | 230.0 |
| (1) | | 242.2 |
| (1) | | Office | | 201.1 |
| (1) | | 230.0 |
| (1) |
| 1900 K Street, NW | | Office | | 335.0 |
| (1) | | 327.3 |
| | | Office | | 330.0 |
| (1) | | 335.0 |
| (1) |
| Mass Court | | Apartments | | 169.0 |
| (1) | | 169.1 |
| (1) | | Apartments | | 171.0 |
| (1) | | 169.0 |
| (1) |
| Mazza Gallerie | | Retail | | 78.0 |
| | 92.8 |
| | | Retail | | — |
| | 78.0 |
| |
| The Ashton | | Apartments | | 39.2 |
| | 41.2 |
| | | Apartments | | 37.5 |
| | 39.2 |
| |
| The Louis at 14th | | Apartments | | 183.2 |
| | 182.6 |
| | | Apartments | | 176.0 |
| | 183.2 |
| |
| The Woodley | | Apartments | | 203.0 |
| | | 203.3 |
| | | Apartments | | 191.0 |
| | | 203.0 |
| |
| TOTAL REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES | | | | | | | | | |
| (Cost $12,818.1 and $12,289.0) | | $ | 15,452.8 |
| | | $ | 14,606.2 |
| | |
| (Cost $12,972.5 and $12,818.1) | | | $ | 15,742.7 |
| | | $ | 15,452.8 |
| |
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
REAL ESTATE JOINT VENTURES AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS—21.6%22.1% and 17.5%21.6%
REAL ESTATE JOINT VENTURES—21.1%21.6% and 16.9%21.1%
| | | Location/Description | | Type | | Fair Value at December 31, | | Type | | Fair Value at December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| California: | | | | | | | | |
CA—Colorado Center LP Colorado Center (50% Account Interest) | | Office | | $ | 567.8 |
| | $ | 559.3 |
| | | Office | | $ | 351.0 |
| (2) | | $ | 567.8 |
| |
PC Borrower, LLC Pacific City (70% Account Interest) | | Retail | | 128.5 |
| | — |
| | | Retail | | 134.9 |
| | 128.5 |
| |
TREA 9625 Towne Center, LLC 9625 Towne Centre Drive (35.86% Account Interest) | | | Land | | 15.1 |
| | — |
| |
TREA Campus Pointe 1, LLC
Campus Pointe 1 (45% Account Interest) | | Office | | 137.5 |
| | — |
| | | Office | | 143.0 |
| | 137.5 |
| |
TREA Campus Pointe 2, LLC
Campus Pointe 2 (40.47% Account Interest) | | Office | | 85.7 |
| | — |
| | |
TREA Campus Pointe 2 & 3, LLC
Campus Pointe 2 & 3 (45% Account Interest) | | | Office (12) | | 127.1 |
| | 85.7 |
| |
TREA Campus Pointe 4, LLC
Campus Pointe 4 (45% Account Interest) | | | Office | | 8.8 |
| | — |
| |
T-C 1500 Owens, LLC 1500 Owens Street (49.9% Account Interest) | | Office | | 74.8 |
| | 73.5 |
| | | Office | | 77.5 |
| | 74.8 |
| |
T-C Foundry Square II Venture LLC Foundry Square II (50.1% Account Interest) | | Office | | 200.1 |
| (2) | | 189.6 |
| (2) | | Office | | 262.7 |
| | 200.1 |
| (2) |
T-C Illinois Street, LLC 409-499 Illinois Street (40% Account Interest) | | Office | | 196.8 |
| | 190.8 |
| | | Office | | 209.3 |
| | 196.8 |
| |
Valencia Town Center Associates LP Valencia Town Center (50% Account Interest) | | Retail | | 128.0 |
| (2) | | 120.5 |
| (2) | | Retail | | 138.8 |
| (2) | | 128.0 |
| (2) |
| Florida: | | | | | | | | |
Florida Mall Associates, Ltd The Florida Mall (50% Account Interest) | | Retail | | 755.8 |
| (2) | | 644.5 |
| (2) | | Retail | | 758.4 |
| (2) | | 755.8 |
| (2) |
TREA Florida Retail, LLC Florida Retail Portfolio (80% Account Interest) | | Retail | | 147.6 |
| | 136.5 |
| | | Retail | | 150.6 |
| | 147.6 |
| |
West Dade County Associates Miami International Mall (50% Account Interest) | | Retail | | 161.1 |
| (2) | | 134.1 |
| (2) | | Retail | | 166.0 |
| (2) | | 161.1 |
| (2) |
| Maryland: | | | | | | | | |
WP Project Developer The Shops at Wisconsin Place (33.33% Account Interest) | | Retail | | 19.4 |
| | 19.6 |
| | | Retail | | 20.0 |
| | 19.4 |
| |
| Massachusetts: | | | | | | | | |
One Boston Place REIT One Boston Place (50.25% Account Interest) | | Office | | 224.2 |
| | 204.3 |
| | | Office | | 229.1 |
| | 224.2 |
| |
T-C 225 Binney, LLC 225 Binney Street (70% Account Interest) | | Office | | 194.9 |
| | 192.9 |
| | | Office | | 201.9 |
| | 194.9 |
| |
| Nevada | | | | | | | | | | |
Fashion Show Holding I, LLC Fashion Show (50% Account Interest) | | Retail | | 839.1 |
| (2) | | — |
| | | Retail | | 844.4 |
| (2) | | 839.1 |
| (2) |
| New York: | | | | | | | | |
401 West 14th Street, LLC 401 West 14th Street (42.19% Account Interest) | | Retail | | 41.1 |
| (2) | | 38.9 |
| (2) | | Retail | | 46.4 |
| (2) | | 41.1 |
| (2) |
817 Broadway Owner, LLC 817 Broadway (61.46% Account Interest) | | Office | | 20.8 |
| (2) | | — |
| | | Office | | 23.0 |
| (2) | | 20.8 |
| (2) |
MRA Hub 34 Holding, LLC The Hub (95% Account Interest) | | Office | | 54.9 |
| (2) | | — |
| | | Office | | 56.9 |
| (2) | | 54.9 |
| (2) |
RGM 42, LLC MiMA (70% Account Interest) | | Apartments | | 194.7 |
| (2) | | 199.0 |
| (2) | | Apartments | | 189.2 |
| (2) | | 194.7 |
| (2) |
| Tennessee: | | | | | |
West Town Mall, LLC West Town Mall (50% Account Interest) | | Retail | | 154.4 |
| (2) | | 128.2 |
| (2) | |
| Texas: | | | | | |
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
| | | Location/Description | | Type | | Fair Value at December 31, | | Type | | Fair Value at December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | 2017 | | 2016 |
TREA 35th Street LIC Investor Member, LLC Commerce LIC (97.5% Account Interest) | | | Industrial | | $ | 58.2 |
| | $ | — |
| |
| Tennessee: | | | | | |
West Town Mall, LLC West Town Mall (50% Account Interest) | | | Retail | | 140.4 |
| (2) | | 154.4 |
| (2) |
| Texas: | | | | | |
Four Oaks Venture LP Four Oaks Place LP (51% Account Interest) | | Office | | $ | 342.3 |
| (2) | | $ | 379.5 |
| (2) | | Office | | 338.7 |
| (2) | | 342.3 |
| (2) |
| Washington: | | | | | | | | |
T-C REA 400 Fairview Investor, LLC 400 Fairview (90% Account Interest) | | Office | | 243.6 |
| | 235.5 |
| | | Office | | 263.7 |
| | 243.6 |
| |
| Various: | | | | | | | | |
DDRTC Core Retail Fund, LLC DDR Joint Venture (85% Account Interest) | | Retail | | 552.8 |
| (2,3) | | 488.8 |
| (2,3) | | Retail | | 636.2 |
| (2,3) | | 552.8 |
| (2,3) |
Storage Portfolio I, LLC Storage Portfolio (75% Account Interest) | | Storage | | 156.5 |
| (2,3) | | 132.9 |
| (2,3) | | Storage | | 177.5 |
| (2,3) | | 156.5 |
| (2,3) |
TOTAL REAL ESTATE JOINT VENTURES (Cost $4,393.2 and $3,032.3) | | $ | 5,622.4 |
| | | $ | 4,068.4 |
| | |
Storage Portfolio II, LLC Storage Portfolio (90% Account Interest) | | | Storage | | 91.8 |
| (2,3) | | — |
| |
TOTAL REAL ESTATE JOINT VENTURES (Cost $4,534.5 and $4,393.2) | | | $ | 5,860.6 |
| | | $ | 5,622.4 |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS—0.5% and 0.6% | | | | | |
| LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS—0.5% and 0.5% | | LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS—0.5% and 0.5% | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Clarion Gables Multi-Family Trust LP (8.31% Account Interest) | | $ | 121.6 |
| | $ | 112.9 |
| | |
| Clarion Gables Multi-Family Trust LP (7.74% Account Interest) | | Clarion Gables Multi-Family Trust LP (7.74% Account Interest) | | $ | 126.7 |
| | $ | 121.6 |
| |
| Colony Realty Partners LP (5.27% Account Interest) | Colony Realty Partners LP (5.27% Account Interest) | | 3.1 |
| (10) | | 20.4 |
| (10) | Colony Realty Partners LP (5.27% Account Interest) | | — |
| | 3.1 |
| (10) |
| Lion Gables Apartment Fund (18.46% Account Interest) | Lion Gables Apartment Fund (18.46% Account Interest) | | 0.2 |
| (5) | | — |
| (5) | Lion Gables Apartment Fund (18.46% Account Interest) | | — |
| | 0.2 |
| (5) |
| Taconic New York City GP Fund, LP (60% Account Interest) | Taconic New York City GP Fund, LP (60% Account Interest) | | 4.8 |
| | — |
| | Taconic New York City GP Fund, LP (60% Account Interest) | | 10.8 |
| | 4.8 |
| |
| Transwestern Mezz Realty Partners III, LLC (11.708% Account Interest) | Transwestern Mezz Realty Partners III, LLC (11.708% Account Interest) | | 7.8 |
| | | 11.5 |
| | Transwestern Mezz Realty Partners III, LLC (11.708% Account Interest) | | 4.9 |
| | | 7.8 |
| |
TOTAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS (Cost $137.2 and $139.1) | | $ | 137.5 |
| | | $ | 144.8 |
| | |
TOTAL REAL ESTATE JOINT VENTURES AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS (Cost $4,530.4 and $3,171.4) | | $ | 5,759.9 |
| | | $ | 4,213.2 |
| | |
TOTAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS (Cost $140.8 and $137.2) | | | $ | 142.4 |
| | | $ | 137.5 |
| |
TOTAL REAL ESTATE JOINT VENTURES AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS (Cost $4,675.3 and $4,530.4) | | TOTAL REAL ESTATE JOINT VENTURES AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS (Cost $4,675.3 and $4,530.4) | | $ | 6,003.0 |
| | | $ | 5,759.9 |
| |
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
MARKETABLE SECURITIES—19.3%18.9% and 21.6%19.3%
REAL ESTATE-RELATED MARKETABLE SECURITIES—4.1%4.6% and 4.2%4.1%
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Shares | | Issuer | | Fair Value at December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| 84,437 |
| | 74,537 |
| | Acadia Realty Trust | | $ | 2.8 |
| | $ | 2.5 |
|
| 26,717 |
| | 18,734 |
| | Agree Realty Corporation | | 1.2 |
| | 0.6 |
|
| 2,132 |
| | 2,183 |
| | Alexander's, Inc. | | 0.9 |
| | 0.8 |
|
| 83,175 |
| | 78,684 |
| | Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. | | 9.2 |
| | 7.1 |
|
| 41,010 |
| | 41,950 |
| | American Assets Trust, Inc. | | 1.8 |
| | 1.6 |
|
| 138,467 |
| | 122,225 |
| | American Campus Communities, Inc. | | 6.9 |
| | 5.1 |
|
| 6,347 |
| | 6,347 |
| | American Farmland Company | | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
|
| 233,916 |
| | 163,619 |
| | American Homes 4 Rent | | 4.9 |
| | 2.7 |
|
| — |
| | 35,204 |
| | American Residential Properties | | — |
| | 0.7 |
|
| 443,315 |
| | 458,181 |
| | American Tower Corp. | | 46.8 |
| | 44.4 |
|
| 163,592 |
| | 170,490 |
| | Apartment Investment and Management Company | | 7.4 |
| | 6.8 |
|
| 223,733 |
| | 181,776 |
| | Apple Hospitality Inc. | | 4.5 |
| | 3.6 |
|
| 38,282 |
| | 34,711 |
| | Armada Hoffler Properties Inc. | | 0.6 |
| | 0.4 |
|
| 27,631 |
| | 29,357 |
| | Ashford Hospitality Prime Inc. | | 0.4 |
| | 0.4 |
|
| 96,553 |
| | 100,517 |
| | Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. | | 0.7 |
| | 0.6 |
|
| 143,728 |
| | 148,389 |
| | Avalonbay Communities, Inc. | | 25.5 |
| | 27.3 |
|
| — |
| | 222,345 |
| | BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. | | — |
| | 5.3 |
|
| 21,354 |
| | 20,504 |
| | Bluerock Residential Growth, Inc. | | 0.3 |
| | 0.2 |
|
| 160,997 |
| | 166,324 |
| | Boston Properties, Inc. | | 20.3 |
| | 21.2 |
|
| 183,336 |
| | 195,470 |
| | Brandywine Realty Trust | | 3.0 |
| | 2.7 |
|
| 319,555 |
| | 190,718 |
| | Brixmore Porperty Group Inc | | 7.8 |
| | 4.9 |
|
| 91,727 |
| | 94,156 |
| | Camden Property Trust | | 7.7 |
| | 7.2 |
|
| — |
| | 70,056 |
| | Campus Crest Communities, Inc. | | — |
| | 0.5 |
|
| 89,419 |
| | 89,888 |
| | Care Capital Properties, Inc. | | 2.2 |
| | 2.7 |
|
| 64,966 |
| | 55,061 |
| | CareTrust REIT Inc. | | 1.0 |
| | 0.6 |
|
| 43,788 |
| | 46,704 |
| | Catchmark Timber Trust, Inc. | | 0.5 |
| | 0.5 |
|
| 178,895 |
| | 185,704 |
| | CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. | | 2.1 |
| | 2.3 |
|
| 92,124 |
| | 92,124 |
| | Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. | | 0.6 |
| | 0.7 |
|
| 39,759 |
| | 40,150 |
| | Chatham Lodging Trust | | 0.8 |
| | 0.8 |
|
| 63,363 |
| | 64,801 |
| | Chesapeake Lodging Trust | | 1.6 |
| | 1.6 |
|
| 50,961 |
| | — |
| | Colony Starwood Homes | | 1.5 |
| | — |
|
| 130,704 |
| | 135,599 |
| | Columbia Property Trust Inc. | | 2.8 |
| | 3.2 |
|
| 161,499 |
| | 136,492 |
| | Communication Sales & Leasing, Inc. | | 4.1 |
| | 2.6 |
|
| 13,231 |
| | 7,031 |
| | Community Healthcare Trust, Inc. | | 0.3 |
| | 0.1 |
|
| 117,878 |
| | — |
| | CoreCivic, Inc. | | 2.9 |
| | — |
|
| 12,695 |
| | 12,695 |
| | Corenergy Infrastructure Trust, Inc. | | 0.4 |
| | 0.2 |
|
| 35,452 |
| | 33,372 |
| | CoreSite Realty Corporation | | 2.8 |
| | 1.9 |
|
| 98,668 |
| | 103,186 |
| | Corporate Office Properties Trust | | 3.1 |
| | 2.3 |
|
| — |
| | 122,465 |
| | Corrections Corporation of America | | — |
| | 3.2 |
|
| 358,876 |
| | 231,292 |
| | Cousins Properties Incorporated | | 3.1 |
| | 2.2 |
|
| 378,286 |
| | 362,207 |
| | Crown Castle International Corporation | | 32.8 |
| | 31.3 |
|
| 189,128 |
| | 184,709 |
| | Cubesmart | | 5.1 |
| | 5.7 |
|
| 80,245 |
| | 64,520 |
| | CyrusOne Inc. | | 3.6 |
| | 2.4 |
|
| 95,203 |
| | 96,068 |
| | DCT Industrial Trust, Inc. | | 4.6 |
| | 3.6 |
|
| 326,844 |
| | 333,126 |
| | DDR Corp | | 5.0 |
| | 5.6 |
|
| 211,566 |
| | 219,413 |
| | DiamondRock Hospitality Company | | 2.4 |
| | 2.1 |
|
| 166,911 |
| | 147,536 |
| | Digital Realty Trust, Inc. | | 16.4 |
| | 11.2 |
|
| 146,715 |
| | 147,977 |
| | Douglas Emmett, Inc. | | 5.4 |
| | 4.6 |
|
| 371,513 |
| | 376,363 |
| | Duke Realty Corporation | | 9.9 |
| | 7.9 |
|
| 79,039 |
| | 71,557 |
| | DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc. | | 3.5 |
| | 2.3 |
|
| 38,107 |
| | 14,727 |
| | Easterly Government Properties, Inc. | | 0.8 |
| | 0.3 |
|
| 34,448 |
| | 34,861 |
| | EastGroup Properties, Inc. | | 2.5 |
| | 1.9 |
|
| 76,609 |
| | 60,392 |
| | Education Realty Trust, Inc. | | 3.2 |
| | 2.3 |
|
| 128,313 |
| | 99,527 |
| | Empire State Realty Trust | | 2.6 |
| | 1.8 |
|
| 66,086 |
| | 64,743 |
| | EPR Properties | | 4.7 |
| | 3.8 |
|
| 74,499 |
| | 66,786 |
| | Equinix Inc. | | 26.6 |
| | 20.2 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Shares | | Issuer | | Fair Value at December 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | |
| 90,769 |
| | 84,437 |
| | Acadia Realty Trust | | $ | 2.5 |
| | $ | 2.8 |
| |
| 31,513 |
| | 26,717 |
| | Agree Realty Corporation | | 1.6 |
| | 1.2 |
| |
| 2,309 |
| | 2,132 |
| | Alexander's, Inc. | | 0.9 |
| | 0.9 |
| |
| 103,464 |
| | 83,175 |
| | Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. | | 13.5 |
| | 9.2 |
| |
| 53,951 |
| | — |
| | Altisource Residential Corporation | | 0.6 |
| | — |
| |
| 43,804 |
| | 41,010 |
| | American Assets Trust, Inc. | | 1.7 |
| | 1.8 |
| |
| 148,817 |
| | 138,467 |
| | American Campus Communities, Inc. | | 6.1 |
| | 6.9 |
| |
| — |
| | 6,347 |
| | American Farmland Company | | — |
| | 0.1 |
| |
| 263,720 |
| | 233,916 |
| | American Homes 4 Rent | | 5.8 |
| | 4.9 |
| |
| 462,615 |
| | 443,315 |
| | American Tower Corp. | | 66.0 |
| | 46.8 |
| |
| 171,065 |
| | 163,592 |
| | Apartment Investment and Management Company | | 7.5 |
| | 7.4 |
| |
| 231,041 |
| | 223,733 |
| | Apple Hospitality Inc. | | 4.5 |
| | 4.5 |
| |
| 47,395 |
| | 38,282 |
| | Armada Hoffler Properties Inc. | | 0.7 |
| | 0.6 |
| |
| 27,462 |
| | 27,631 |
| | Ashford Hospitality Prime Inc. | | 0.3 |
| | 0.4 |
| |
| 88,009 |
| | 96,553 |
| | Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. | | 0.6 |
| | 0.7 |
| |
| 150,694 |
| | 143,728 |
| | Avalonbay Communities, Inc. | | 26.9 |
| | 25.5 |
| |
| 24,509 |
| | 21,354 |
| | Bluerock Residential Growth, Inc. | | 0.2 |
| | 0.3 |
| |
| 168,560 |
| | 160,997 |
| | Boston Properties, Inc. | | 21.9 |
| | 20.3 |
| |
| 189,208 |
| | 183,336 |
| | Brandywine Realty Trust | | 3.4 |
| | 3.0 |
| |
| 336,302 |
| | 319,555 |
| | Brixmore Porperty Group Inc | | 6.3 |
| | 7.8 |
| |
| 99,633 |
| | 91,727 |
| | Camden Property Trust | | 9.2 |
| | 7.7 |
| |
| — |
| | 89,419 |
| | Care Capital Properties, Inc. | | — |
| | 2.2 |
| |
| 85,789 |
| | 64,966 |
| | CareTrust REIT Inc. | | 1.4 |
| | 1.0 |
| |
| 48,438 |
| | 43,788 |
| | Catchmark Timber Trust, Inc. | | 0.6 |
| | 0.5 |
| |
| 185,540 |
| | 178,895 |
| | CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. | | 1.1 |
| (9) | 2.1 |
| |
| 92,124 |
| | 92,124 |
| | Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. | | 0.6 |
| | 0.6 |
| |
| 49,866 |
| | 39,759 |
| | Chatham Lodging Trust | | 1.1 |
| | 0.8 |
| |
| 64,702 |
| | 63,363 |
| | Chesapeake Lodging Trust | | 1.8 |
| | 1.6 |
| |
| 32,933 |
| | — |
| | City Office REIT, Inc. | | 0.4 |
| | — |
| |
| 15,330 |
| | — |
| | Clipper Realty, Inc. | | 0.2 |
| | — |
| |
| 583,920 |
| | — |
| | Colony Northstar, Inc. | | 6.7 |
| | — |
| |
| — |
| | 50,961 |
| | Colony Starwood Homes | | — |
| | 1.5 |
| |
| 131,158 |
| | 130,704 |
| | Columbia Property Trust Inc. | | 3.0 |
| | 2.8 |
| |
| — |
| | 161,499 |
| | Communication Sales & Leasing, Inc. | | — |
| | 4.1 |
| |
| 17,855 |
| | 13,231 |
| | Community Healthcare Trust, Inc. | | 0.5 |
| | 0.3 |
| |
| 130,237 |
| | 117,878 |
| | CoreCivic, Inc. | | 2.9 |
| | 2.9 |
| |
| 12,695 |
| | 12,695 |
| | Corenergy Infrastructure Trust, Inc. | | 0.5 |
| | 0.4 |
| |
| 37,213 |
| | 35,452 |
| | CoreSite Realty Corporation | | 4.2 |
| | 2.8 |
| |
| 109,361 |
| | 98,668 |
| | Corporate Office Properties Trust | | 3.2 |
| | 3.1 |
| |
| 458,712 |
| | 358,876 |
| | Cousins Properties Incorporated | | 4.2 |
| | 3.1 |
| |
| 440,146 |
| | 378,286 |
| | Crown Castle International Corporation | | 48.9 |
| | 32.8 |
| |
| 197,633 |
| | 189,128 |
| | Cubesmart | | 5.7 |
| | 5.1 |
| |
| 98,521 |
| | 80,245 |
| | CyrusOne Inc. | | 5.9 |
| | 3.6 |
| |
| 101,202 |
| | 95,203 |
| | DCT Industrial Trust, Inc. | | 5.9 |
| | 4.6 |
| |
| 340,952 |
| | 326,844 |
| | DDR Corp | | 3.1 |
| | 5.0 |
| |
| 219,132 |
| | 211,566 |
| | DiamondRock Hospitality Company | | 2.5 |
| | 2.4 |
| |
| 223,448 |
| | 166,911 |
| | Digital Realty Trust, Inc. | | 25.5 |
| | 16.4 |
| |
| 174,051 |
| | 146,715 |
| | Douglas Emmett, Inc. | | 7.1 |
| | 5.4 |
| |
| 388,940 |
| | 371,513 |
| | Duke Realty Corporation | | 10.6 |
| | 9.9 |
| |
| — |
| | 79,039 |
| | DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc. | | — |
| | 3.5 |
| |
| 46,776 |
| | 38,107 |
| | Easterly Government Properties, Inc. | | 1.0 |
| | 0.8 |
| |
| 36,626 |
| | 34,448 |
| | EastGroup Properties, Inc. | | 3.2 |
| | 2.5 |
| |
| 82,652 |
| | 76,609 |
| | Education Realty Trust, Inc. | | 2.9 |
| | 3.2 |
| |
| 139,642 |
| | 128,313 |
| | Empire State Realty Trust | | 2.9 |
| | 2.6 |
| |
| 68,867 |
| | 66,086 |
| | EPR Properties | | 4.5 |
| | 4.7 |
| |
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Shares | | Issuer | | Fair Value at December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| 132,412 |
| | 136,984 |
| | Equity Commonwealth | | $ | 4.0 |
| | $ | 3.8 |
|
| 81,207 |
| | 83,026 |
| | Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc. | | 5.9 |
| | 5.5 |
|
| 97,735 |
| | 85,201 |
| | Equity One, Inc. | | 3.0 |
| | 2.3 |
|
| 378,516 |
| | 390,695 |
| | Equity Residential | | 24.4 |
| | 31.9 |
|
| 39,142 |
| | — |
| | Escrow Winthrop Realty Trust | | 0.3 |
| | — |
|
| 68,928 |
| | 71,115 |
| | Essex Property Trust, Inc. | | 16.0 |
| | 17.0 |
|
| 123,598 |
| | 125,053 |
| | Extra Space Storage, Inc. | | 9.5 |
| | 11.0 |
|
| 20,247 |
| | — |
| | Farmland Partners, Inc. | | 0.2 |
| (9) | — |
|
| 75,390 |
| | 74,751 |
| | Federal Realty Investment Trust | | 10.7 |
| | 10.9 |
|
| 146,636 |
| | 157,554 |
| | FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated | | 1.2 |
| | 1.2 |
|
| 122,078 |
| | 119,778 |
| | First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. | | 3.4 |
| | 2.7 |
|
| 62,454 |
| | 68,780 |
| | First Potomac Realty Trust | | 0.7 |
| | 0.8 |
|
| 247,510 |
| | — |
| | Forest City Realty Trust A | | 5.2 |
| | — |
|
| 62,347 |
| | — |
| | Four Corners Property Trust | | 1.3 |
| | — |
|
| 105,457 |
| | 98,453 |
| | Franklin Street Properties Corp. | | 1.4 |
| | 1.0 |
|
| 215,403 |
| | 95,044 |
| | Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. | | 6.6 |
| | 2.6 |
|
| 528,439 |
| | 546,334 |
| | General Growth Properties, Inc. | | 13.2 |
| | 14.9 |
|
| 75,332 |
| | 77,601 |
| | GEO Group Inc./The | | 2.7 |
| | 2.2 |
|
| 27,304 |
| | 26,214 |
| | Getty Realty Corp. | | 0.7 |
| | 0.5 |
|
| 24,752 |
| | 23,254 |
| | Gladstone Commercial Corporation | | 0.5 |
| | 0.3 |
|
| 14,323 |
| | — |
| | Global Medical REIT, Inc. | | 0.1 |
| (9) | — |
|
| 169,785 |
| | — |
| | Global Net Lease, Inc. | | 1.3 |
| | — |
|
| 74,542 |
| | 76,778 |
| | Government Properties Income Trust | | 1.4 |
| | 1.2 |
|
| 439,336 |
| | 451,331 |
| | Gramercy Property Trust Inc. | | 4.0 |
| | 3.5 |
|
| 488,199 |
| | 504,269 |
| | HCP, Inc. | | 14.5 |
| | 19.3 |
|
| 121,172 |
| | 109,418 |
| | Healthcare Realty Trust Inc. | | 3.7 |
| | 3.1 |
|
| 148,194 |
| | 137,819 |
| | Healthcare Trust of America | | 4.3 |
| | 3.7 |
|
| 38,921 |
| | 44,636 |
| | Hersha Hospitality Trust | | 0.8 |
| | 1.0 |
|
| 105,127 |
| | 102,464 |
| | Highwoods Properties, Inc. | | 5.4 |
| | 4.5 |
|
| 172,557 |
| | 165,124 |
| | Hospitality Properties Trust | | 5.5 |
| | 4.3 |
|
| 784,264 |
| | 825,304 |
| | Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | | 14.8 |
| | 12.7 |
|
| 130,545 |
| | 79,867 |
| | Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. | | 4.5 |
| | 2.3 |
|
| 64,154 |
| | 32,461 |
| | Independence Realty Trust, Inc. | | 0.6 |
| | 0.2 |
|
| — |
| | 94,370 |
| | Inland Real Estate Corp. | | — |
| | 1.0 |
|
| 130,841 |
| | 136,573 |
| | Investors Real Estate Trust | | 0.9 |
| | 0.9 |
|
| 251,283 |
| | 201,089 |
| | Iron Mountain Inc. | | 8.2 |
| | 5.4 |
|
| 1,500,000 |
| | 1,500,000 |
| | iShares Dow Jones US Real Estate Index Fund | | 115.4 |
| (9) | 112.7 |
|
| 96,739 |
| | 100,594 |
| | Kilroy Realty Corporation | | 7.1 |
| | 6.4 |
|
| 446,152 |
| | 448,463 |
| | Kimco Realty Corporation | | 11.2 |
| | 11.9 |
|
| 86,474 |
| | 89,244 |
| | Kite Realty Group Trust | | 2.0 |
| | 2.3 |
|
| 86,839 |
| | 89,664 |
| | Lamar Advertising Corporation | | 5.8 |
| | 5.4 |
|
| 118,625 |
| | 123,151 |
| | LaSalle Hotel Properties | | 3.6 |
| | 3.1 |
|
| 246,697 |
| | 256,516 |
| | Lexington Realty Trust | | 2.7 |
| | 2.1 |
|
| 154,875 |
| | 162,768 |
| | Liberty Property Trust | | 6.1 |
| | 5.1 |
|
| 48,870 |
| | — |
| | Life Storage, Inc. | | 4.2 |
| | — |
|
| 41,261 |
| | 38,232 |
| | LTC Properties, Inc. | | 1.9 |
| | 1.6 |
|
| 93,046 |
| | 97,182 |
| | Mack-Cali Realty Corporation | | 2.7 |
| | 2.3 |
|
| 23,475 |
| | — |
| | Medequities Realty Trust, Inc. | | 0.3 |
| | — |
|
| 337,220 |
| | 255,456 |
| | Medical Properties Trust, Inc. | | 4.1 |
| | 2.9 |
|
| 118,873 |
| | 81,978 |
| | Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. | | 11.6 |
| | 7.4 |
|
| 69,038 |
| | 61,924 |
| | Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation | | 1.1 |
| | 0.6 |
|
| 175,519 |
| | 184,354 |
| | Monogram Residential Trust Inc. | | 1.9 |
| | 1.8 |
|
| 38,542 |
| | 37,511 |
| | National Health Investors, Inc. | | 2.9 |
| | 2.3 |
|
| 154,142 |
| | 146,133 |
| | National Retail Properties, Inc. | | 6.8 |
| | 5.9 |
|
| 44,249 |
| | 24,977 |
| | National Storage Affiliates Trust | | 1.0 |
| | 0.4 |
|
| 83,324 |
| | 87,273 |
| | New Senior Investment Group | | 0.8 |
| | 0.9 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Shares | | Issuer | | Fair Value at December 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | |
| 85,048 |
| | 74,499 |
| | Equinix Inc. | | $ | 38.5 |
| | $ | 26.6 |
| |
| 132,344 |
| | 132,412 |
| | Equity Commonwealth | | 4.0 |
| | 4.0 |
| |
| 89,456 |
| | 81,207 |
| | Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc. | | 8.0 |
| | 5.9 |
| |
| — |
| | 97,735 |
| | Equity One, Inc. | | — |
| | 3.0 |
| |
| 390,235 |
| | 378,516 |
| | Equity Residential | | 24.9 |
| | 24.4 |
| |
| 39,142 |
| | 39,142 |
| | Escrow Winthrop Realty Trust | | 0.3 |
| | 0.3 |
| |
| 71,499 |
| | 68,928 |
| | Essex Property Trust, Inc. | | 17.3 |
| | 16.0 |
| |
| 133,620 |
| | 123,598 |
| | Extra Space Storage, Inc. | | 11.7 |
| | 9.5 |
| |
| 33,146 |
| | 20,247 |
| | Farmland Partners, Inc. | | 0.3 |
| (9) | 0.2 |
| (9) |
| 78,850 |
| | 75,390 |
| | Federal Realty Investment Trust | | 10.5 |
| | 10.7 |
| |
| — |
| | 146,636 |
| | FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated | | — |
| | 1.2 |
| |
| 130,114 |
| | 122,078 |
| | First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. | | 4.1 |
| | 3.4 |
| |
| — |
| | 62,454 |
| | First Potomac Realty Trust | | — |
| | 0.7 |
| |
| 266,222 |
| | 247,510 |
| | Forest City Realty Trust A | | 6.4 |
| | 5.2 |
| |
| 68,809 |
| | 62,347 |
| | Four Corners Property Trust | | 1.8 |
| | 1.3 |
| |
| 119,538 |
| | 105,457 |
| | Franklin Street Properties Corp. | | 1.3 |
| | 1.4 |
| |
| 221,037 |
| | 215,403 |
| | Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. | | 8.2 |
| | 6.6 |
| |
| 674,285 |
| | 528,439 |
| | General Growth Properties, Inc. | | 15.8 |
| | 13.2 |
| |
| 134,715 |
| | 75,332 |
| | GEO Group Inc./The | | 3.2 |
| | 2.7 |
| |
| 36,337 |
| | 27,304 |
| | Getty Realty Corp. | | 1.0 |
| | 0.7 |
| |
| 30,560 |
| | 24,752 |
| | Gladstone Commercial Corporation | | 0.6 |
| | 0.5 |
| |
| 11,775 |
| | — |
| | Gladstone Land Corporation | | 0.2 |
| | — |
| |
| 14,323 |
| | 14,323 |
| | Global Medical REIT, Inc. | | 0.1 |
| (9) | 0.1 |
| (9) |
| 73,715 |
| | 169,785 |
| | Global Net Lease, Inc. | | 1.5 |
| | 1.3 |
| |
| 102,459 |
| | 74,542 |
| | Government Properties Income Trust | | 1.9 |
| | 1.4 |
| |
| 173,959 |
| | 439,336 |
| | Gramercy Property Trust Inc. | | 4.6 |
| | 4.0 |
| |
| 513,801 |
| | 488,199 |
| | HCP, Inc. | | 13.4 |
| | 14.5 |
| |
| 133,528 |
| | 121,172 |
| | Healthcare Realty Trust Inc. | | 4.3 |
| | 3.7 |
| |
| 221,345 |
| | 148,194 |
| | Healthcare Trust of America | | 6.6 |
| | 4.3 |
| |
| 45,394 |
| | 38,921 |
| | Hersha Hospitality Trust | | 0.8 |
| | 0.8 |
| |
| 111,471 |
| | 105,127 |
| | Highwoods Properties, Inc. | | 5.7 |
| | 5.4 |
| |
| 179,103 |
| | 172,557 |
| | Hospitality Properties Trust | | 5.3 |
| | 5.5 |
| |
| 799,202 |
| | 784,264 |
| | Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | | 15.9 |
| | 14.8 |
| |
| 171,423 |
| | 130,545 |
| | Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. | | 5.9 |
| | 4.5 |
| |
| 93,383 |
| | 64,154 |
| | Independence Realty Trust, Inc. | | 0.9 |
| | 0.6 |
| |
| 130,841 |
| | 130,841 |
| | Investors Real Estate Trust | | 0.7 |
| | 0.9 |
| |
| 320,427 |
| | — |
| | Invitation Homes, Inc. | | 7.6 |
| | — |
| |
| 302,923 |
| | 251,283 |
| | Iron Mountain Inc. | | 11.4 |
| | 8.2 |
| |
| 1,500,000 |
| | 1,500,000 |
| | iShares Dow Jones US Real Estate Index Fund | | 121.5 |
| (9) | 115.4 |
| (9) |
| 94,915 |
| | — |
| | JBG Smith Properties | | 3.3 |
| | — |
| |
| 106,012 |
| | 96,739 |
| | Kilroy Realty Corporation | | 7.9 |
| | 7.1 |
| |
| 451,921 |
| | 446,152 |
| | Kimco Realty Corporation | | 8.2 |
| | 11.2 |
| |
| 90,119 |
| | 86,474 |
| | Kite Realty Group Trust | | 1.8 |
| | 2.0 |
| |
| 91,259 |
| | 86,839 |
| | Lamar Advertising Corporation | | 6.8 |
| | 5.8 |
| |
| 124,427 |
| | 118,625 |
| | LaSalle Hotel Properties | | 3.5 |
| | 3.6 |
| |
| 257,171 |
| | 246,697 |
| | Lexington Realty Trust | | 2.5 |
| | 2.7 |
| |
| 161,972 |
| | 154,875 |
| | Liberty Property Trust | | 7.0 |
| | 6.1 |
| |
| 50,130 |
| | 48,870 |
| | Life Storage, Inc. | | 4.5 |
| | 4.2 |
| |
| 42,489 |
| | 41,261 |
| | LTC Properties, Inc. | | 1.9 |
| | 1.9 |
| |
| 99,130 |
| | 93,046 |
| | Mack-Cali Realty Corporation | | 2.1 |
| | 2.7 |
| |
| 29,800 |
| | 23,475 |
| | Medequities Realty Trust, Inc. | | 0.3 |
| | 0.3 |
| |
| 399,374 |
| | 337,220 |
| | Medical Properties Trust, Inc. | | 5.5 |
| | 4.1 |
| |
| 123,965 |
| | 118,873 |
| | Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. | | 12.5 |
| | 11.6 |
| |
| 80,492 |
| | 69,038 |
| | Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation | | 1.4 |
| | 1.1 |
| |
| — |
| | 175,519 |
| | Monogram Residential Trust Inc. | | — |
| | 1.9 |
| |
| 43,294 |
| | 38,542 |
| | National Health Investors, Inc. | | 3.3 |
| | 2.9 |
| |
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Shares | | Issuer | | Fair Value at December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| 175,401 |
| | 177,920 |
| | New York REIT | | $ | 1.8 |
| | $ | 2.0 |
|
| 17,140 |
| | 18,365 |
| | Nexpoint Residential Trust, Inc. | | 0.4 |
| | 0.2 |
|
| 59,329 |
| | 72,837 |
| | NorthStar Realty Europe Corp. | | 0.7 |
| | 0.9 |
|
| 189,799 |
| | 189,319 |
| | NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. | | 2.9 |
| | 3.2 |
|
| 181,435 |
| | 178,475 |
| | Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. | | 5.7 |
| | 6.2 |
|
| 16,324 |
| | 11,794 |
| | One Liberty Properties, Inc. | | 0.4 |
| | 0.3 |
|
| 144,614 |
| | 148,839 |
| | Outfront Media Inc. | | 3.6 |
| | 3.2 |
|
| 157,741 |
| | 156,333 |
| | Paramount Group Inc. | | 2.5 |
| | 2.8 |
|
| 45,533 |
| | 86,954 |
| | Parkway Properties, Inc. | | 1.0 |
| | 1.4 |
|
| 75,815 |
| | 78,371 |
| | Pebblebrook Hotel Trust | | 2.3 |
| | 2.2 |
|
| 69,866 |
| | 72,024 |
| | Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust | | 1.3 |
| | 1.6 |
|
| 141,267 |
| | 95,326 |
| | Physicians Realty Trust | | 2.7 |
| | 1.6 |
|
| 153,053 |
| | 157,777 |
| | Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. | | 3.2 |
| | 3.0 |
|
| — |
| | 190,702 |
| | Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. | | — |
| | 9.1 |
|
| — |
| | 58,985 |
| | Post Properties, Inc. | | — |
| | 3.5 |
|
| 39,487 |
| | 40,691 |
| | Potlatch Corporation | | 1.6 |
| | 1.2 |
|
| 25,352 |
| | 23,945 |
| | Preferred Apartment Communities, Inc. | | 0.4 |
| | 0.3 |
|
| 549,455 |
| | 568,315 |
| | ProLogis | | 29.0 |
| | 24.4 |
|
| 20,916 |
| | 21,667 |
| | PS Business Parks, Inc. | | 2.4 |
| | 1.9 |
|
| 152,197 |
| | 157,211 |
| | Public Storage, Inc. | | 34.0 |
| | 38.9 |
|
| 47,125 |
| | 41,960 |
| | QTS Realty Trust, Inc. | | 2.3 |
| | 1.9 |
|
| 98,883 |
| | — |
| | Quality Care Properties | | 1.5 |
| | — |
|
| 82,342 |
| | 84,869 |
| | Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust | | 1.4 |
| | 1.4 |
|
| 129,796 |
| | 137,264 |
| | Rayonier, Inc. | | 3.4 |
| | 3.0 |
|
| 270,184 |
| | 270,636 |
| | Realty Income Corporation | | 15.5 |
| | 14.0 |
|
| 109,616 |
| | 101,582 |
| | Regency Centers Corporation | | 7.6 |
| | 6.9 |
|
| 113,887 |
| | 106,928 |
| | Retail Opportunity Investment | | 2.4 |
| | 1.9 |
|
| 247,302 |
| | 257,274 |
| | Retail Properties of America | | 3.8 |
| | 3.8 |
|
| 67,197 |
| | 59,147 |
| | Rexford Industrial Realty Inc. | | 1.6 |
| | 1.0 |
|
| 131,026 |
| | 136,460 |
| | RLJ Lodging Trust | | 3.2 |
| | 3.0 |
|
| — |
| | 39,799 |
| | Rouse Properties, Inc. | | — |
| | 0.6 |
|
| 50,994 |
| | 53,069 |
| | Ryman Hospitality Properties | | 3.2 |
| | 2.7 |
|
| 68,440 |
| | 74,407 |
| | Sabra Health Care REIT Inc. | | 1.7 |
| | 1.5 |
|
| 14,267 |
| | 15,057 |
| | Saul Centers, Inc. | | 0.9 |
| | 0.8 |
|
| 71,466 |
| | 73,541 |
| | Select Income Real Estate Investment Trust | | 1.8 |
| | 1.5 |
|
| 248,749 |
| | 259,057 |
| | Senior Housing Properties Trust | | 4.7 |
| | 3.8 |
|
| 36,820 |
| | 36,820 |
| | Silver Bay Realty Trust Corp. | | 0.6 |
| | 0.6 |
|
| 329,687 |
| | 336,974 |
| | Simon Property Group, Inc. | | 58.6 |
| | 65.5 |
|
| 106,453 |
| | 108,594 |
| | SL Green Realty Corp. | | 11.4 |
| | 12.3 |
|
| — |
| | 38,958 |
| | Sovran Self Storage, Inc. | | — |
| | 4.2 |
|
| 483,032 |
| | 459,110 |
| | Spirit Realty Capital Inc. | | 5.2 |
| | 4.6 |
|
| 78,649 |
| | 73,832 |
| | Stag Industrial, Inc. | | 1.9 |
| | 1.4 |
|
| — |
| | 41,562 |
| | Starwood Waypoint Residential Trust | | — |
| | 0.9 |
|
| 162,012 |
| | 70,283 |
| | STORE Capital Corporation | | 4.0 |
| | 1.6 |
|
| 88,627 |
| | 91,828 |
| | Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. | | 1.4 |
| | 1.1 |
|
| 68,173 |
| | 60,628 |
| | Sun Communities, Inc. | | 5.2 |
| | 4.2 |
|
| 227,526 |
| | 228,054 |
| | Sunstone Hotel Investors, L.L.C. | | 3.5 |
| | 2.8 |
|
| 100,862 |
| | 104,353 |
| | Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. | | 3.6 |
| | 3.4 |
|
| 63,335 |
| | 65,358 |
| | Taubman Centers, Inc. | | 4.7 |
| | 5.0 |
|
| 48,484 |
| | 46,459 |
| | Terreno Realty Corporation | | 1.4 |
| | 1.1 |
|
| 150,999 |
| | 171,305 |
| | The Macerich Company | | 10.7 |
| | 13.8 |
|
| 50,411 |
| | 52,125 |
| | Tier Inc. | | 0.9 |
| | 0.8 |
|
| 280,233 |
| | 285,672 |
| | UDR, Inc. | | 10.2 |
| | 10.7 |
|
| 27,329 |
| | 26,623 |
| | UMH Properties, Inc. | | 0.4 |
| | 0.3 |
|
| 14,676 |
| | 14,263 |
| | Universal Health Realty Income Trust | | 1.0 |
| | 0.7 |
|
| 93,500 |
| | 97,203 |
| | Urban Edge Properties | | 2.6 |
| | 2.3 |
|
| 31,959 |
| | 28,041 |
| | Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc. | | 0.8 |
| | 0.5 |
|
| 371,296 |
| | 358,667 |
| | Ventas, Inc. | | 23.2 |
| | 20.2 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Shares | | Issuer | | Fair Value at December 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | |
| 165,743 |
| | 154,142 |
| | National Retail Properties, Inc. | | $ | 7.1 |
| | $ | 6.8 |
| |
| 49,957 |
| | 44,249 |
| | National Storage Affiliates Trust | | 1.4 |
| | 1.0 |
| |
| 90,062 |
| | 83,324 |
| | New Senior Investment Group | | 0.7 |
| | 0.8 |
| |
| — |
| | 175,401 |
| | New York REIT | | — |
| | 1.8 |
| |
| 19,294 |
| | 17,140 |
| | Nexpoint Residential Trust, Inc. | | 0.5 |
| | 0.4 |
| |
| 61,800 |
| | 59,329 |
| | NorthStar Realty Europe Corp. | | 0.8 |
| | 0.7 |
| |
| — |
| | 189,799 |
| | NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. | | — |
| | 2.9 |
| |
| 214,048 |
| | 181,435 |
| | Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. | | 5.9 |
| (9) | 5.7 |
| |
| 16,324 |
| | 16,324 |
| | One Liberty Properties, Inc. | | 0.4 |
| | 0.4 |
| |
| 152,483 |
| | 144,614 |
| | Outfront Media Inc. | | 3.5 |
| | 3.6 |
| |
| 225,256 |
| | 157,741 |
| | Paramount Group Inc. | | 3.6 |
| | 2.5 |
| |
| 159,738 |
| | — |
| | Park Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | | 4.6 |
| | — |
| |
| — |
| | 45,533 |
| | Parkway Properties, Inc. | | — |
| | 1.0 |
| |
| 75,337 |
| | 75,815 |
| | Pebblebrook Hotel Trust | | 2.8 |
| | 2.3 |
| |
| 69,866 |
| | 69,866 |
| | Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust | | 0.8 |
| | 1.3 |
| |
| 195,747 |
| | 141,267 |
| | Physicians Realty Trust | | 3.5 |
| | 2.7 |
| |
| 159,189 |
| | 153,053 |
| | Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. | | 3.1 |
| | 3.2 |
| |
| 44,326 |
| | 39,487 |
| | Potlatch Corporation | | 2.2 |
| | 1.6 |
| |
| 39,774 |
| | 25,352 |
| | Preferred Apartment Communities, Inc. | | 0.8 |
| | 0.4 |
| |
| 577,161 |
| | 549,455 |
| | ProLogis | | 37.2 |
| | 29.0 |
| |
| 21,348 |
| | 20,916 |
| | PS Business Parks, Inc. | | 2.7 |
| | 2.4 |
| |
| 161,952 |
| | 152,197 |
| | Public Storage, Inc. | | 33.8 |
| | 34.0 |
| |
| 53,551 |
| | 47,125 |
| | QTS Realty Trust, Inc. | | 2.9 |
| | 2.3 |
| |
| 104,106 |
| | 98,883 |
| | Quality Care Properties | | 1.4 |
| | 1.5 |
| |
| 84,467 |
| | 82,342 |
| | Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust | | 1.2 |
| | 1.4 |
| |
| 140,926 |
| | 129,796 |
| | Rayonier, Inc. | | 4.5 |
| | 3.4 |
| |
| 308,355 |
| | 270,184 |
| | Realty Income Corporation | | 17.6 |
| | 15.5 |
| |
| 163,631 |
| | 109,616 |
| | Regency Centers Corporation | | 11.3 |
| | 7.6 |
| |
| 118,002 |
| | 113,887 |
| | Retail Opportunity Investment | | 2.4 |
| | 2.4 |
| |
| 248,555 |
| | 247,302 |
| | Retail Properties of America | | 3.3 |
| | 3.8 |
| |
| 83,912 |
| | 67,197 |
| | Rexford Industrial Realty Inc. | | 2.4 |
| | 1.6 |
| |
| 185,465 |
| | 131,026 |
| | RLJ Lodging Trust | | 4.1 |
| | 3.2 |
| |
| 48,519 |
| | 50,994 |
| | Ryman Hospitality Properties | | 3.3 |
| | 3.2 |
| |
| 191,602 |
| | 68,440 |
| | Sabra Health Care REIT Inc. | | 3.6 |
| | 1.7 |
| |
| 11,006 |
| | — |
| | Safety Income and Growth, Inc. | | 0.2 |
| | — |
| |
| 12,343 |
| | 14,267 |
| | Saul Centers, Inc. | | 0.8 |
| | 0.9 |
| |
| 131,401 |
| | — |
| | SBA Communications Corporation | | 21.5 |
| | — |
| |
| 69,474 |
| | 71,466 |
| | Select Income Real Estate Investment Trust | | 1.7 |
| | 1.8 |
| |
| 259,176 |
| | 248,749 |
| | Senior Housing Properties Trust | | 5.0 |
| | 4.7 |
| |
| — |
| | 36,820 |
| | Silver Bay Realty Trust Corp. | | — |
| | 0.6 |
| |
| 340,430 |
| | 329,687 |
| | Simon Property Group, Inc. | | 58.5 |
| | 58.6 |
| |
| 105,521 |
| | 106,453 |
| | SL Green Realty Corp. | | 10.7 |
| | 11.4 |
| |
| 498,344 |
| | 483,032 |
| | Spirit Realty Capital Inc. | | 4.3 |
| | 5.2 |
| |
| 102,712 |
| | 78,649 |
| | Stag Industrial, Inc. | | 2.8 |
| | 1.9 |
| |
| 187,343 |
| | 162,012 |
| | STORE Capital Corporation | | 4.9 |
| | 4.0 |
| |
| 113,544 |
| | 88,627 |
| | Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. | | 1.7 |
| | 1.4 |
| |
| 83,430 |
| | 68,173 |
| | Sun Communities, Inc. | | 7.7 |
| | 5.2 |
| |
| 247,441 |
| | 227,526 |
| | Sunstone Hotel Investors, L.L.C. | | 4.1 |
| | 3.5 |
| |
| 101,087 |
| | 100,862 |
| | Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. | | 2.7 |
| (9) | 3.6 |
| |
| 64,816 |
| | 63,335 |
| | Taubman Centers, Inc. | | 4.2 |
| | 4.7 |
| |
| 58,066 |
| | 48,484 |
| | Terreno Realty Corporation | | 2.0 |
| | 1.4 |
| |
| 149,606 |
| | 150,999 |
| | The Macerich Company | | 9.8 |
| | 10.7 |
| |
| 54,543 |
| | 50,411 |
| | Tier Inc. | | 1.1 |
| | 0.9 |
| |
| 289,926 |
| | 280,233 |
| | UDR, Inc. | | 11.2 |
| | 10.2 |
| |
| 34,876 |
| | 27,329 |
| | UMH Properties, Inc. | | 0.5 |
| | 0.4 |
| |
| 182,231 |
| | — |
| | UNITI Group, Inc. | | 3.2 |
| (9) | — |
| |
| 14,449 |
| | 14,676 |
| | Universal Health Realty Income Trust | | 1.1 |
| | 1.0 |
| |
| 112,531 |
| | 93,500 |
| | Urban Edge Properties | | 2.9 |
| | 2.6 |
| |
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Shares | | Issuer | | Fair Value at December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| 1,012,629 |
| | 985,845 |
| | VEREIT, Inc. | | $ | 8.6 |
| | $ | 7.8 |
|
| 177,780 |
| | 183,731 |
| | Vornado Realty Trust | | 18.6 |
| | 18.4 |
|
| 193,859 |
| | — |
| | Washington Prime Group, Inc. | | 2.0 |
| | — |
|
| 78,200 |
| | 73,550 |
| | Washington Real Estate Investment Trust | | 2.6 |
| | 2.0 |
|
| 120,820 |
| | 121,612 |
| | Weingarten Realty Investors | | 4.3 |
| | 4.2 |
|
| 380,425 |
| | 380,157 |
| | Welltower Inc. | | 25.5 |
| | 25.9 |
|
| 783,938 |
| | 553,851 |
| | Weyerhaeuser Company | | 23.6 |
| | 16.6 |
|
| 32,110 |
| | 27,622 |
| | Whitestone Real Estate Investment Trust B | | 0.5 |
| | 0.3 |
|
| — |
| | 39,142 |
| | Winthrop Realty Trust | | — |
| | 0.5 |
|
| 95,234 |
| | 95,448 |
| | WP Carey Inc. | | 5.6 |
| | 5.6 |
|
| — |
| | 200,141 |
| | WP Glimcher Inc. | | — |
| | 2.1 |
|
| 113,720 |
| | 121,567 |
| | Xenia Hotels & Resorts Inc. | | 2.2 |
| | 1.9 |
|
TOTAL REAL ESTATE-RELATED MARKETABLE SECURITIES
(Cost $883.9 and $859.5) | | $ | 1,081.5 |
| | $ | 1,024.4 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Shares | | Issuer | | Fair Value at December 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | |
| 31,959 |
| | 31,959 |
| | Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc. | | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 0.8 |
| |
| 388,195 |
| | 371,296 |
| | Ventas, Inc. | | 23.3 |
| | 23.2 |
| |
| 1,065,264 |
| | 1,012,629 |
| | VEREIT, Inc. | | 8.3 |
| | 8.6 |
| |
| 188,214 |
| | 177,780 |
| | Vornado Realty Trust | | 14.7 |
| | 18.6 |
| |
| 203,651 |
| | 193,859 |
| | Washington Prime Group, Inc. | | 1.4 |
| | 2.0 |
| |
| 85,659 |
| | 78,200 |
| | Washington Real Estate Investment Trust | | 2.7 |
| | 2.6 |
| |
| 132,066 |
| | 120,820 |
| | Weingarten Realty Investors | | 4.3 |
| | 4.3 |
| |
| 401,236 |
| | 380,425 |
| | Welltower Inc. | | 25.6 |
| | 25.5 |
| |
| 816,991 |
| | 783,938 |
| | Weyerhaeuser Company | | 28.8 |
| | 23.6 |
| |
| 38,883 |
| | 32,110 |
| | Whitestone Real Estate Investment Trust B | | 0.6 |
| | 0.5 |
| |
| 116,079 |
| | 95,234 |
| | WP Carey Inc. | | 8.0 |
| | 5.6 |
| |
| 118,158 |
| | 113,720 |
| | Xenia Hotels & Resorts Inc. | | 2.6 |
| | 2.2 |
| |
TOTAL REAL ESTATE-RELATED MARKETABLE SECURITIES
(Cost $991.0 and $883.9) | | $ | 1,238.0 |
| | $ | 1,081.5 |
| |
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
OTHER MARKETABLE SECURITIES—15.2%14.3% and 17.4%15.2%
GOVERNMENT AGENCY NOTES—8.7%10.6% and 11.0%8.7%
| | | Principal | Principal | | Issuer | | Yield(4) | | Maturity Date | | Fair Value at December 31, | Principal | | Issuer | | Yield(4) | | Maturity Date | | Fair Value at December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 | |
| 2017 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | Issuer | | Yield(4) | | Maturity Date | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 4.0 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.162% | | 1/4/2016 | | $ | — |
| | $ | 4.0 |
| — |
| | $ | 22.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 22.0 |
|
| — | | — |
| | 42.0 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.366% - 0.482% | | 3/1/2017 | | — |
| | 42.0 |
|
| — | | — |
| | 10.0 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.427% | | 3/3/2017 | | — |
| | 10.0 |
|
| — | | — |
| | 20.0 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.427% | | 3/6/2017 | | — |
| | 20.0 |
|
| — | | — |
| | 20.0 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.406% | | 3/13/2017 | | — |
| | 20.0 |
|
| — | | — |
| | 30.3 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.406% | | 3/27/2017 | | — |
| | 30.3 |
|
| — | | — |
| | 25.0 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.406% | | 3/28/2017 | | — |
| | 25.0 |
|
| — | | — |
| | 30.0 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.518% | | 4/18/2017 | | — |
| | 29.9 |
|
| — | | — |
| | 24.0 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.483% - 0.579% | | 4/19/2017 | | — |
| | 24.0 |
|
| — | | — |
| | 31.5 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.447% - 0.539% | | 5/1/2017 | | — |
| | 31.5 |
|
| — | | — |
| | 49.9 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.518% | | 5/2/2017 | | — |
| | 49.9 |
|
| — | | — |
| | 39.9 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.539% | | 5/5/2017 | | — |
| | 39.9 |
|
| 10.0 | | 10.0 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 1.077% | | 1/9/2018 | | 10.0 |
| | — |
|
| 14.2 | | 14.2 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 1.093% | | 1/10/2018 | | 14.2 |
| | — |
|
| 40.0 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 1.115% | | 1/11/2018 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
|
| 19.0 | | 19.0 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 1.118% | | 1/19/2018 | | 19.0 |
| | — |
|
| 30.0 | | 30.0 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 1.038% | | 1/22/2018 | | 30.0 |
| | — |
|
| 46.2 | | 46.2 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 1.038% | | 1/23/2018 | | 46.1 |
| | — |
|
| 35.1 | | 35.1 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 1.038% | | 1/24/2018 | | 35.1 |
| | — |
|
| 14.6 | | 14.6 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 1.088% | | 1/29/2018 | | 14.5 |
| | — |
|
| 35.1 | | 35.1 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 1.079% | | 1/30/2018 | | 35.1 |
| | — |
|
| 26.2 | | 26.2 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 1.109% - 1.225% | | 2/7/2018 | | 26.2 |
| | — |
|
| 25.0 | | 25.0 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 1.145% | | 2/16/2018 | | 25.0 |
| | — |
|
| 50.0 | | 50.0 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 1.140% - 1.150% | | 2/20/2018 | | 49.9 |
| | — |
|
| 30.2 | | 30.2 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 1.140% | | 2/21/2018 | | 30.2 |
| | — |
|
| 40.0 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 1.221% | | 3/7/2018 | | 39.9 |
| | — |
|
| 40.0 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 1.221% | | 3/8/2018 | | 39.9 |
| | — |
|
| 34.1 | | 34.1 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 1.221% | | 3/9/2018 | | 34.0 |
| | — |
|
| 20.0 | | 20.0 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 1.303% | | 3/13/2018 | | 19.9 |
| | — |
|
| 37.2 | | 37.2 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 1.313% | | 3/19/2018 | | 37.0 |
| | — |
|
| 15.0 | | 15.0 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 1.303% | | 3/20/2018 | | 15.0 |
| | — |
|
| 10.0 | | 10.0 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 1.308% | | 3/22/2018 | | 10.0 |
| | — |
|
| 39.3 | | 39.3 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 1.318% | | 3/29/2018 | | 39.1 |
| | — |
|
| 30.0 | | 30.0 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 1.323% | | 4/2/2018 | | 29.9 |
| | — |
|
| 35.2 | | 35.2 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 1.313% - 1.323% | | 4/3/2018 | | 35.1 |
| | — |
|
| 40.0 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 1.334% | | 4/9/2018 | | 39.9 |
| | — |
|
| — | | — |
| | 19.9 |
| | Farmer Mac Discount Notes | | 0.682% | | 6/1/2017 | | — |
| | 19.9 |
|
| 14.0 | | 14.0 |
| | — |
| | Farmer Mac Discount Notes | | 1.169% | | 2/1/2018 | | 14.0 |
| | — |
|
| — | — |
| | 9.0 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.213% | | 1/5/2016 | | — |
| | 9.0 |
| — |
| | 15.5 |
| | Federal Farm Credit Bank Discount Notes | | 0.376% - 0.381% | | 2/22/2017 | | — |
| | 15.5 |
|
| — | — |
| | 40.0 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.218% | | 1/12/2016 | | — |
| | 40.0 |
| — |
| | 34.7 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.304% - 0.355% | | 1/3/2017 | | — |
| | 34.7 |
|
| — | — |
| | 15.0 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.223% | | 1/19/2016 | | — |
| | 15.0 |
| — |
| | 40.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.345% | | 1/4/2017 | | — |
| | 40.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 26.6 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.225% | | 1/20/2016 | | — |
| | 26.6 |
| — |
| | 29.2 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.355% - 0.447% | | 1/6/2017 | | — |
| | 29.2 |
|
| — | — |
| | 25.0 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.223% | | 1/27/2016 | | — |
| | 25.0 |
| — |
| | 7.1 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.299% - 0.345% | | 1/9/2017 | | — |
| | 7.1 |
|
| — | — |
| | 5.9 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.274% | | 2/2/2016 | | — |
| | 5.9 |
| — |
| | 25.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.325% | | 1/10/2017 | | — |
| | 25.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 10.9 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.244% | | 2/3/2016 | | — |
| | 10.8 |
| — |
| | 50.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.304% - 0.396% | | 1/11/2017 | | — |
| | 50.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 2.0 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.345% | | 2/8/2016 | | — |
| | 2.0 |
| — |
| | 33.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.365% - 0.396% | | 1/12/2017 | | — |
| | 33.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 36.2 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.132% - 0.172% | | 2/10/2016 | | — |
| | 36.2 |
| — |
| | 50.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.386% | | 1/13/2017 | | — |
| | 50.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 25.0 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.300% | | 3/2/2016 | | — |
| | 25.0 |
| — |
| | 36.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.345% | | 1/17/2017 | | — |
| | 36.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 50.0 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.275% - 0.305% | | 3/9/2016 | | — |
| | 50.0 |
| — |
| | 42.1 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.294% - 0.365% | | 1/18/2017 | | — |
| | 42.1 |
|
| — | — |
| | 4.0 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.203% | | 3/14/2016 | | — |
| | 4.0 |
| — |
| | 20.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.284% | | 1/20/2017 | | — |
| | 20.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 16.0 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.213% | | 3/16/2016 | | — |
| | 16.0 |
| — |
| | 50.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.335% | | 1/23/2017 | | — |
| | 50.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 24.0 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.162% | | 3/17/2016 | | — |
| | 24.0 |
| — |
| | 47.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.345% | | 1/24/2017 | | — |
| | 47.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 4.0 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.213% | | 3/30/2016 | | — |
| | 4.0 |
| — |
| | 34.8 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.304% - 0.360% | | 1/25/2017 | | — |
| | 34.8 |
|
| — | — |
| | 24.9 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.183% | | 4/4/2016 | | — |
| | 24.9 |
| — |
| | 45.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.294% - 0.406% | | 1/27/2017 | | — |
| | 45.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 10.0 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.178% | | 4/5/2016 | | — |
| | 10.0 |
| — |
| | 25.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.416% | | 1/30/2017 | | — |
| | 25.0 |
|
| — |
| | 25.5 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.215% | | 4/6/2016 | | — |
| | 25.5 |
| |
| — |
| | 20.1 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.193% | | 4/11/2016 | | — |
| | 20.0 |
| |
| — |
| | 50.0 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.188% | | 4/12/2016 | | — |
| | 49.9 |
| |
| — |
| | 4.0 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.310% | | 4/18/2016 | | — |
| | 4.0 |
| |
| — |
| | 3.5 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.233% | | 4/19/2016 | | — |
| | 3.5 |
| |
| — |
| | 25.3 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.325% - 0.340% | | 4/27/2016 | | — |
| | 25.2 |
| |
| — |
| | 25.0 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.366% | | 5/4/2016 | | — |
| | 24.9 |
| |
| — |
| | 20.1 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.371% | | 5/18/2016 | | — |
| | 20.0 |
| |
| — |
| | 17.0 |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.342% - 0.417% | | 5/25/2016 | | — |
| | 17.0 |
| |
| 22.0 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.416% | | 2/1/2017 | | 22.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 42.0 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.366% - 0.482% | | 3/1/2017 | | 42.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 10.0 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.427% | | 3/3/2017 | | 10.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 20.0 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.427% | | 3/6/2017 | | 20.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 20.0 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.406% | | 3/13/2017 | | 20.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 30.3 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.406% | | 3/27/2017 | | 30.3 |
| | — |
| |
| 25.0 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.406% | | 3/28/2017 | | 25.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 30.0 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.518% | | 4/18/2017 | | 29.9 |
| | — |
| |
| 24.0 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.483% - 0.579% | | 4/19/2017 | | 24.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 31.5 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.447% - 0.539% | | 5/1/2017 | | 31.5 |
| | — |
| |
| 49.9 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.518% | | 5/2/2017 | | 49.9 |
| | — |
| |
| 39.9 |
| | — |
| | Fannie Mae Discount Notes | | 0.539% | | 5/5/2017 | | 39.9 |
| | — |
| |
| 19.9 |
| | — |
| | Farmer Mac Discount Notes | | 0.682% | | 6/1/2017 | | 19.9 |
| | — |
| |
| — |
| | 21.6 |
| | Federal Farm Credit Bank Discount Notes | | 0.254% | | 2/9/2016 | | — |
| | 21.6 |
| |
| — |
| | 46.0 |
| | Federal Farm Credit Bank Discount Notes | | 0.162% | | 3/10/2016 | | — |
| | 46.0 |
| |
| — |
| | 10.7 |
| | Federal Farm Credit Bank Discount Notes | | 0.549% | | 6/10/2016 | | — |
| | 10.7 |
| |
| — |
| | 25.0 |
| | Federal Farm Credit Bank Discount Notes | | 0.315% | | 7/27/2016 | | — |
| | 24.9 |
| |
| 15.5 |
| | — |
| | Federal Farm Credit Bank Discount Notes | | 0.376% - 0.381% | | 2/22/2017 | | 15.5 |
| | — |
| |
| — |
| | 21.9 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.167% - 0.193% | | 1/4/2016 | | — |
| | 21.8 |
| |
| — |
| | 48.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.112% | | 1/6/2016 | | — |
| | 48.0 |
| |
| — |
| | 47.1 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.101% - 0.183% | | 1/8/2016 | | — |
| | 47.1 |
| |
| — |
| | 10.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.233% | | 1/11/2016 | | — |
| | 10.0 |
| |
| — |
| | 15.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.233% | | 1/12/2016 | | — |
| | 15.0 |
| |
| — |
| | 34.6 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.112% - 0.162% | | 1/13/2016 | | — |
| | 34.6 |
| |
| — |
| | 40.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.112% - 0.254% | | 1/15/2016 | | — |
| | 40.0 |
| |
| — |
| | 9.2 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.254% | | 1/19/2016 | | — |
| | 9.2 |
| |
| — |
| | 48.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.112% - 0.274% | | 1/20/2016 | | — |
| | 48.0 |
| |
| — |
| | 50.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.112% | | 1/22/2016 | | — |
| | 50.0 |
| |
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
| | | Principal | Principal | | Issuer | | Yield(4) | | Maturity Date | | Fair Value at December 31, | Principal | | Issuer | | Yield(4) | | Maturity Date | | Fair Value at December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 | |
| 2017 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | Issuer | | Yield(4) | | Maturity Date | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 10.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.152% - 0.284% | | 1/26/2016 | | $ | — |
| | $ | 10.0 |
| — |
| | $ | 34.7 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 34.7 |
|
| — | — |
| | 13.3 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.249% | | 2/1/2016 | | — |
| | 13.3 |
| — |
| | 42.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.406% | | 2/3/2017 | | — |
| | 42.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 50.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.112% | | 2/2/2016 | | — |
| | 50.0 |
| — |
| | 15.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.416% | | 2/7/2017 | | — |
| | 15.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 39.2 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.132% - 0.157% | | 2/3/2016 | | — |
| | 39.1 |
| — |
| | 10.2 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.376% | | 2/10/2017 | | — |
| | 10.2 |
|
| — | — |
| | 3.2 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.193% | | 2/5/2016 | | — |
| | 3.2 |
| — |
| | 50.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.386% - 0.487% | | 2/17/2017 | | — |
| | 50.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 52.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.193% - 0.203% | | 2/8/2016 | | — |
| | 52.0 |
| — |
| | 30.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.365% | | 2/21/2017 | | — |
| | 30.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 45.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.132% | | 2/12/2016 | | — |
| | 45.0 |
| — |
| | 30.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.437% | | 2/22/2017 | | — |
| | 30.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 65.1 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.203% - 0.406% | | 2/16/2016 | | — |
| | 65.1 |
| — |
| | 50.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.396% | | 2/24/2017 | | — |
| | 50.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 13.5 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.274% | | 2/19/2016 | | — |
| | 13.5 |
| — |
| | 20.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.533% | | 2/27/2017 | | — |
| | 20.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 28.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.152% | | 2/22/2016 | | — |
| | 28.0 |
| — |
| | 10.1 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.518% | | 3/3/2017 | | — |
| | 10.1 |
|
| — | — |
| | 40.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.132% | | 2/23/2016 | | — |
| | 40.0 |
| — |
| | 15.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.523% | | 3/6/2017 | | — |
| | 15.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 50.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.264% - 0.325% | | 2/24/2016 | | — |
| | 50.0 |
| — |
| | 30.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.538% | | 3/8/2017 | | — |
| | 30.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 36.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.142% | | 2/26/2016 | | — |
| | 36.0 |
| — |
| | 45.8 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.447% - 0.574% | | 3/10/2017 | | — |
| | 45.8 |
|
| — | — |
| | 40.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.304% | | 3/1/2016 | | — |
| | 40.0 |
| — |
| | 20.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.543% | | 3/14/2017 | | — |
| | 20.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 21.6 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.172% | | 3/8/2016 | | — |
| | 21.6 |
| — |
| | 40.5 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.528% - 0.579% | | 3/17/2017 | | — |
| | 40.5 |
|
| — | — |
| | 73.8 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.325% - 0.360% | | 3/14/2016 | | — |
| | 73.8 |
| — |
| | 49.9 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.538% | | 3/20/2017 | | — |
| | 49.9 |
|
| — | — |
| | 4.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.172% | | 3/15/2016 | | — |
| | 4.0 |
| — |
| | 36.1 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.533% | | 3/22/2017 | | — |
| | 36.1 |
|
| — | — |
| | 25.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.188% | | 3/21/2016 | | — |
| | 25.0 |
| — |
| | 28.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.427% - 0.518% | | 3/23/2017 | | — |
| | 28.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 15.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.193% | | 3/23/2016 | | — |
| | 15.0 |
| — |
| | 40.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.528% | | 3/24/2017 | | — |
| | 40.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 44.5 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.508% | | 3/28/2016 | | — |
| | 44.4 |
| — |
| | 25.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.548% | | 3/28/2017 | | — |
| | 25.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 12.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.249% - 0.254% | | 3/30/2016 | | — |
| | 12.0 |
| — |
| | 31.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.558% | | 3/29/2017 | | — |
| | 31.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 24.2 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.213% | | 4/1/2016 | | — |
| | 24.2 |
| — |
| | 6.4 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.477% | | 3/31/2017 | | — |
| | 6.4 |
|
| — | — |
| | 25.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.335% | | 4/8/2016 | | — |
| | 25.0 |
| — |
| | 49.9 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.559% | | 4/17/2017 | | — |
| | 49.9 |
|
| — | — |
| | 50.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.508% | | 4/11/2016 | | — |
| | 49.9 |
| — |
| | 26.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.548% - 0.605% | | 4/19/2017 | | — |
| | 26.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 44.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.284% - 0.508% | | 4/13/2016 | | — |
| | 43.9 |
| — |
| | 20.1 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.488% | | 4/28/2017 | | — |
| | 20.1 |
|
| — | — |
| | 49.1 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.239% - 0.335% | | 4/15/2016 | | — |
| | 49.0 |
| — |
| | 25.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.538% - 0.600% | | 5/5/2017 | | — |
| | 25.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 54.5 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.246% - 0.345% | | 4/20/2016 | | — |
| | 54.4 |
| — |
| | 37.2 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.558% - 0.641% | | 5/12/2017 | | — |
| | 37.2 |
|
| — |
| | 30.1 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.254% | | 4/22/2016 | | — |
| | 30.1 |
| |
| — |
| | 28.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.325% | | 4/27/2016 | | — |
| | 28.0 |
| |
| — |
| | 50.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.610% | | 6/8/2016 | | — |
| | 49.9 |
| |
| — |
| | 25.0 |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.274% | | 6/13/2016 | | — |
| | 24.9 |
| |
| 34.7 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.304% - 0.355% | | 1/3/2017 | | 34.7 |
| | — |
| |
| 20.2 | | 20.2 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.069% | | 1/2/2018 | | 20.2 |
| | — |
|
| 40.0 | 40.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.345% | | 1/4/2017 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
| 40.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.079% | | 1/3/2018 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
|
| 29.2 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.355% - 0.447% | | 1/6/2017 | | 29.2 |
| | — |
| |
| 7.1 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.299% - 0.345% | | 1/9/2017 | | 7.1 |
| | — |
| |
| 25.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.325% | | 1/10/2017 | | 25.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 50.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.304% - 0.396% | | 1/11/2017 | | 50.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 40.0 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.068% | | 1/5/2018 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
|
| 40.0 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.068% | | 1/8/2018 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
|
| 33.0 | 33.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.365% - 0.396% | | 1/12/2017 | | 33.0 |
| | — |
| 33.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.058% | | 1/9/2018 | | 33.0 |
| | — |
|
| 50.0 | 50.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.386% | | 1/13/2017 | | 50.0 |
| | — |
| 50.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.068% - 1.118% | | 1/10/2018 | | 50.0 |
| | — |
|
| 36.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.345% | | 1/17/2017 | | 36.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 42.1 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.294% - 0.365% | | 1/18/2017 | | 42.1 |
| | — |
| |
| 30.0 | | 30.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.089% - 1.108% | | 1/12/2018 | | 30.0 |
| | — |
|
| 38.1 | | 38.1 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.068% | | 1/16/2018 | | 38.1 |
| | — |
|
| 50.0 | | 50.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.094% - 1.118% | | 1/17/2018 | | 50.0 |
| | — |
|
| 30.2 | | 30.2 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.063% | | 1/19/2018 | | 30.1 |
| | — |
|
| 20.0 | 20.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.284% | | 1/20/2017 | | 20.0 |
| | — |
| 20.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.134% | | 1/22/2018 | | 20.0 |
| | — |
|
| 50.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.335% | | 1/23/2017 | | 50.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 47.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.345% | | 1/24/2017 | | 47.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 34.8 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.304% - 0.360% | | 1/25/2017 | | 34.8 |
| | — |
| |
| 38.0 | | 38.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.063% | | 1/25/2018 | | 37.9 |
| | — |
|
| 36.1 | | 36.1 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.063% | | 1/26/2018 | | 36.1 |
| | — |
|
| 29.2 | | 29.2 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.069% - 1.290% | | 1/29/2018 | | 29.1 |
| | — |
|
| 24.3 | | 24.3 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.225% | | 2/6/2018 | | 24.2 |
| | — |
|
| 47.1 | | 47.1 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.069% - 1.220% | | 2/9/2018 | | 47.1 |
| | — |
|
| 11.8 | | 11.8 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.140% | | 2/14/2018 | | 11.8 |
| | — |
|
| 25.0 | | 25.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.130% | | 2/16/2018 | | 25.0 |
| | — |
|
| 10.0 | | 10.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.306% | | 2/21/2018 | | 10.0 |
| | — |
|
| 40.0 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.120% | | 2/26/2018 | | 39.9 |
| | — |
|
| 39.4 | | 39.4 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.120% - 1.186% | | 2/27/2018 | | 39.3 |
| | — |
|
| 22.2 | | 22.2 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.161% - 1.232% | | 3/2/2018 | | 22.1 |
| | — |
|
| 45.0 | 45.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.294% - 0.406% | | 1/27/2017 | | 45.0 |
| | — |
| 45.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.212% - 1.313% | | 3/12/2018 | | 44.9 |
| | — |
|
| 25.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.416% | | 1/30/2017 | | 25.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 34.7 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.467% - 0.497% | | 2/1/2017 | | 34.7 |
| | — |
| |
| 42.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.406% | | 2/3/2017 | | 42.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 15.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.416% | | 2/7/2017 | | 15.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 10.2 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.376% | | 2/10/2017 | | 10.2 |
| | — |
| |
| 50.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.386% - 0.487% | | 2/17/2017 | | 50.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 30.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.365% | | 2/21/2017 | | 30.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 30.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.437% | | 2/22/2017 | | 30.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 50.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.396% | | 2/24/2017 | | 50.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 20.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.533% | | 2/27/2017 | | 20.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 10.1 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.518% | | 3/3/2017 | | 10.1 |
| | — |
| |
| 15.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.523% | | 3/6/2017 | | 15.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 28.0 | | 28.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.176% | | 3/13/2018 | | 27.9 |
| | — |
|
| 5.0 | | 5.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.318% | | 3/16/2018 | | 5.0 |
| | — |
|
| 40.0 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.304% | | 3/27/2018 | | 39.9 |
| | — |
|
| 47.4 | | 47.4 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.304% | | 3/28/2018 | | 47.2 |
| | — |
|
| 40.2 | | 40.2 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.324% | | 4/11/2018 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
|
| 15.2 | | 15.2 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.359% | | 4/12/2018 | | 15.2 |
| | — |
|
| 29.1 | | 29.1 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.354% | | 4/16/2018 | | 29.0 |
| | — |
|
| 39.2 | | 39.2 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.365% | | 4/19/2018 | | 39.0 |
| | — |
|
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
| | | Principal | Principal | | Issuer | | Yield(4) | | Maturity Date | | Fair Value at December 31, | Principal | | Issuer | | Yield(4) | | Maturity Date | | Fair Value at December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 | |
| 2017 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | Issuer | | Yield(4) | | Maturity Date | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| $ | 30.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.538% | | 3/8/2017 | | $ | 30.0 |
| | $ | — |
| 40.2 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 40.0 |
| | $ | — |
|
| 45.8 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.447% - 0.574% | | 3/10/2017 | | 45.8 |
| | — |
| |
| 20.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.543% | | 3/14/2017 | | 20.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 40.5 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.528% - 0.579% | | 3/17/2017 | | 40.5 |
| | — |
| |
| 49.9 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.538% | | 3/20/2017 | | 49.9 |
| | — |
| |
| 36.1 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.533% | | 3/22/2017 | | 36.1 |
| | — |
| |
| 28.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.427% - 0.518% | | 3/23/2017 | | 28.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 40.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.528% | | 3/24/2017 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 25.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.548% | | 3/28/2017 | | 25.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 31.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.558% | | 3/29/2017 | | 31.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 6.4 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.477% | | 3/31/2017 | | 6.4 |
| | — |
| |
| 49.9 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.559% | | 4/17/2017 | | 49.9 |
| | — |
| |
| 26.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.605% | | 4/19/2017 | | 26.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 20.1 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.488% | | 4/28/2017 | | 20.1 |
| | — |
| |
| 25.0 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.600% | | 5/5/2017 | | 25.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 37.2 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 0.641% | | 5/12/2017 | | 37.2 |
| | — |
| |
| 33.2 | | 33.2 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.365% | | 4/23/2018 | | 33.0 |
| | — |
|
| 34.2 | | 34.2 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.375% | | 4/24/2018 | | 34.1 |
| | — |
|
| 15.2 | | 15.2 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.371% | | 4/25/2018 | | 15.2 |
| | — |
|
| 28.4 | | 28.4 |
| | — |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes | | 1.403% | | 5/4/2018 | | 28.2 |
| | — |
|
| — | — |
| | 10.4 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.213% - 0.223% | | 1/6/2016 | | — |
| | 10.4 |
| — |
| | 16.1 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.345% | | 1/9/2017 | | — |
| | 16.1 |
|
| — | — |
| | 24.0 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.218% - 0.233% | | 1/22/2016 | | — |
| | 24.0 |
| — |
| | 25.0 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.335% | | 1/10/2017 | | — |
| | 25.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 15.5 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.244% | | 1/25/2016 | | — |
| | 15.5 |
| — |
| | 30.0 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.391% | | 1/20/2017 | | — |
| | 30.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 26.6 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.244% | | 1/28/2016 | | — |
| | 26.6 |
| — |
| | 13.1 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.426% | | 1/30/2017 | | — |
| | 13.1 |
|
| — | — |
| | 50.0 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.233% | | 1/29/2016 | | — |
| | 50.0 |
| — |
| | 40.0 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.447% | | 2/6/2017 | | — |
| | 40.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 43.8 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.152% - 0.183% | | 2/5/2016 | | — |
| | 43.8 |
| — |
| | 36.9 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.436% - 0.457% | | 2/7/2017 | | — |
| | 36.9 |
|
| — | — |
| | 32.0 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.132% - 0.183% | | 2/17/2016 | | — |
| | 32.0 |
| — |
| | 44.2 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.360% | | 2/8/2017 | | — |
| | 44.2 |
|
| — | — |
| | 36.5 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.137% | | 2/19/2016 | | — |
| | 36.5 |
| — |
| | 25.0 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.360% | | 2/10/2017 | | — |
| | 25.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 14.0 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.167% | | 2/26/2016 | | — |
| | 14.0 |
| — |
| | 40.0 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.365% | | 2/13/2017 | | — |
| | 40.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 75.0 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.142% - 0.183% | | 3/4/2016 | | — |
| | 75.0 |
| — |
| | 30.0 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.376% | | 2/14/2017 | | — |
| | 30.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 50.0 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.142% | | 3/7/2016 | | — |
| | 50.0 |
| — |
| | 20.0 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.467% | | 2/21/2017 | | — |
| | 20.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 27.0 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.233% | | 3/11/2016 | | — |
| | 27.0 |
| — |
| | 27.0 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.386% | | 2/27/2017 | | — |
| | 27.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 50.0 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.162% | | 3/18/2016 | | — |
| | 50.0 |
| — |
| | 15.0 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.401% | | 3/3/2017 | | — |
| | 15.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 29.0 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.437% | | 4/1/2016 | | — |
| | 29.0 |
| — |
| | 35.2 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.406% | | 3/7/2017 | | — |
| | 35.2 |
|
| — | — |
| | 2.6 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.203% | | 4/4/2016 | | — |
| | 2.6 |
| — |
| | 14.0 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.411% | | 3/14/2017 | | — |
| | 14.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 50.0 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.355% | | 4/26/2016 | | — |
| | 49.9 |
| — |
| | 50.0 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.427% | | 3/21/2017 | | — |
| | 49.9 |
|
| — | — |
| | 37.1 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.381% | | 5/2/2016 | | — |
| | 37.1 |
| — |
| | 18.0 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.600% | | 4/21/2017 | | — |
| | 18.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 50.0 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.467% | | 5/6/2016 | | — |
| | 49.9 |
| — |
| | 39.9 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.457% | | 5/3/2017 | | — |
| | 39.9 |
|
| — | — |
| | 34.0 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.401% | | 5/9/2016 | | — |
| | 33.9 |
| — |
| | 22.9 |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.483% | | 5/4/2017 | | — |
| | 22.9 |
|
| 16.1 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.345% | | 1/9/2017 | | 16.1 |
| | — |
| |
| 41.2 | | 41.2 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.101% - 1.149% | | 2/2/2018 | | 41.2 |
| | — |
|
| 50.0 | | 50.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.101% - 1.139% | | 2/5/2018 | | 49.9 |
| | — |
|
| 25.0 | 25.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.335% | | 1/10/2017 | | 25.0 |
| | — |
| 25.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.090% | | 2/6/2018 | | 25.0 |
| | — |
|
| 30.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.391% | | 1/20/2017 | | 30.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 13.1 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.426% | | 1/30/2017 | | 13.1 |
| | — |
| |
| 40.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.447% | | 2/6/2017 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 36.9 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.436% - 0.457% | | 2/7/2017 | | 36.9 |
| | — |
| |
| 44.2 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.360% | | 2/8/2017 | | 44.2 |
| | — |
| |
| 25.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.360% | | 2/10/2017 | | 25.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 20.1 | | 20.1 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.100% | | 2/7/2018 | | 20.0 |
| | — |
|
| 42.2 | | 42.2 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.099% | | 2/12/2018 | | 42.1 |
| | — |
|
| 40.0 | 40.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.365% | | 2/13/2017 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
| 40.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.099% | | 2/13/2018 | | 39.9 |
| | — |
|
| 30.0 | 30.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.376% | | 2/14/2017 | | 30.0 |
| | — |
| 30.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.109% | | 2/14/2018 | | 30.0 |
| | — |
|
| 20.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.467% | | 2/21/2017 | | 20.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 27.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.386% | | 2/27/2017 | | 27.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 15.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.401% | | 3/3/2017 | | 15.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 39.5 | | 39.5 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.120% - 1.130% | | 2/23/2018 | | 39.4 |
| | — |
|
| 50.0 | | 50.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.151% | | 3/5/2018 | | 49.9 |
| | — |
|
| 50.0 | | 50.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.151% | | 3/6/2018 | | 49.9 |
| | — |
|
| 49.8 | | 49.8 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.182% - 1.202% | | 3/14/2018 | | 49.6 |
| | — |
|
| 34.2 | | 34.2 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.182% | | 3/16/2018 | | 34.1 |
| | — |
|
| 10.8 | | 10.8 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.192% | | 3/19/2018 | | 10.7 |
| | — |
|
| 32.8 | | 32.8 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.202% | | 3/20/2018 | | 32.7 |
| | — |
|
| 40.0 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.202% | | 3/21/2018 | | 39.9 |
| | — |
|
| 30.0 | | 30.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.182% | | 3/22/2018 | | 29.9 |
| | — |
|
| 40.0 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.212% | | 3/23/2018 | | 39.9 |
| | — |
|
| 40.0 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.223% | | 3/26/2018 | | 39.9 |
| | — |
|
| 24.1 | | 24.1 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.228% | | 4/4/2018 | | 24.0 |
| | — |
|
| 57.7 | | 57.7 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.228% - 1.269% | | 4/5/2018 | | 57.5 |
| | — |
|
| 35.2 | 35.2 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.406% | | 3/7/2017 | | 35.2 |
| | — |
| 35.2 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.289% | | 4/6/2018 | | 35.0 |
| | — |
|
| 14.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.411% | | 3/14/2017 | | 14.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 50.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.427% | | 3/21/2017 | | 49.9 |
| | — |
| |
| 18.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.600% | | 4/21/2017 | | 18.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 39.9 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.457% | | 5/3/2017 | | 39.9 |
| | — |
| |
| 22.9 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 0.483% | | 5/4/2017 | | 22.9 |
| | — |
| |
TOTAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY NOTES (Cost $2,309.0 and $2,667.0) | | $ | 2,308.9 |
| | $ | 2,666.8 |
| |
| 34.9 | | 34.9 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.325% - 1.330% | | 4/10/2018 | | 34.7 |
| | — |
|
| 40.0 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.325% | | 4/11/2018 | | 39.8 |
| | — |
|
| 27.2 | | 27.2 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.324% | | 4/12/2018 | | 27.0 |
| | — |
|
| 40.0 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.334% | | 4/13/2018 | | 39.8 |
| | — |
|
| 30.1 | | 30.1 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.365% | | 4/17/2018 | | 30.0 |
| | — |
|
| 35.2 | | 35.2 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.365% | | 4/18/2018 | | 35.0 |
| | — |
|
| 4.0 | | 4.0 |
| | — |
| | Freddie Mac Discount Notes | | 1.366% | | 5/4/2018 | | 4.0 |
| | — |
|
TOTAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY NOTES (Cost $2,872.8 and $2,309.0) | | TOTAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY NOTES (Cost $2,872.8 and $2,309.0) | | $ | 2,872.3 |
| | $ | 2,308.9 |
|
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
UNITED STATES TREASURY SECURITIES—6.5%3.7% and 6.4%6.5%
| | | Principal | Principal | | Issuer | | Yield(4) | | Maturity Date | | Fair Value at December 31, | Principal | | Issuer | | Yield(4) | | Maturity Date | | Fair Value at December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 | |
| 2017 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | Issuer | | Yield(4) | | Maturity Date | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 48.1 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.162% - 0.190% | | 1/7/2016 | | $ | — |
| | $ | 48.1 |
| — |
| | $ | 35.9 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 35.9 |
|
| — | — |
| | 50.0 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.112% | | 1/14/2016 | | — |
| | 50.0 |
| — |
| | 47.9 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.423% - 0.428% | | 1/19/2017 | | — |
| | 48.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 115.0 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.127% - 0.172% | | 1/21/2016 | | — |
| | 115.0 |
| — |
| | 36.1 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.371% - 0.401% | | 1/26/2017 | | — |
| | 36.1 |
|
| — | — |
| | 110.0 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.224% - 0.226% | | 2/4/2016 | | — |
| | 110.0 |
| — |
| | 60.1 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.363% - 0.423% | | 2/2/2017 | | — |
| | 60.1 |
|
| — | — |
| | 85.0 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.178% - 0.183% | | 2/18/2016 | | — |
| | 85.0 |
| — |
| | 75.0 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.315% - 0.426% | | 2/9/2017 | | — |
| | 75.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 69.1 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.164% - 0.214% | | 2/25/2016 | | — |
| | 69.1 |
| — |
| | 48.0 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.325% - 0.437% | | 2/16/2017 | | — |
| | 48.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 100.0 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.142% - 0.178% | | 3/3/2016 | | — |
| | 100.0 |
| — |
| | 48.0 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.448% - 0.473% | | 2/23/2017 | | — |
| | 48.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 30.0 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.160% | | 3/24/2016 | | — |
| | 30.0 |
| — |
| | 36.0 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.368% - 0.477% | | 3/2/2017 | | — |
| | 36.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 50.0 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.190% | | 4/14/2016 | | — |
| | 50.0 |
| — |
| | 48.7 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.386% - 0.518% | | 3/9/2017 | | — |
| | 48.7 |
|
| — | — |
| | 50.0 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.122% | | 4/21/2016 | | — |
| | 50.0 |
| — |
| | 59.9 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.406% - 0.481% | | 3/16/2017 | | — |
| | 60.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 100.0 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.412% | | 5/5/2016 | | — |
| | 99.9 |
| — |
| | 129.0 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.380% - 0.533% | | 3/23/2017 | | — |
| | 129.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 50.0 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.392% | | 5/26/2016 | | — |
| | 49.9 |
| — |
| | 25.9 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.396% - 0.518% | | 3/30/2017 | | — |
| | 25.9 |
|
| — | — |
| | 83.0 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.467% - 0.534% | | 6/23/2016 | | — |
| | 82.8 |
| — |
| | 58.9 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.411% - 0.509% | | 4/6/2017 | | — |
| | 58.9 |
|
| — | — |
| | 50.0 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.162% - 0.270% | | 7/21/2016 | | — |
| | 49.9 |
| — |
| | 130.8 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.518% - 0.529% | | 4/13/2017 | | — |
| | 130.8 |
|
| — | — |
| | 50.0 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.196% | | 8/18/2016 | | — |
| | 49.8 |
| — |
| | 49.9 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.514% - 0.559% | | 4/20/2017 | | — |
| | 49.9 |
|
| 35.9 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.345% - 0.369% | | 1/5/2017 | | 35.9 |
| | — |
| |
| 47.9 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.423% - 0.428% | | 1/19/2017 | | 48.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 36.1 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.371% - 0.401% | | 1/26/2017 | | 36.1 |
| | — |
| |
| 60.1 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.363% - 0.423% | | 2/2/2017 | | 60.1 |
| | — |
| |
| — | | — |
| | 48.2 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.554% - 0.781% | | 4/27/2017 | | — |
| | 48.2 |
|
| — | | — |
| | 49.9 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.514% | | 5/4/2017 | | — |
| | 49.9 |
|
| — | | — |
| | 42.0 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.601% - 0.623% | | 5/11/2017 | | — |
| | 42.0 |
|
| — | | — |
| | 30.1 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.584% - 0.620% | | 5/18/2017 | | — |
| | 30.1 |
|
| — | | — |
| | 32.0 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.587% | | 6/8/2017 | | — |
| | 32.0 |
|
| — | | — |
| | 74.8 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.541% - 0.654% | | 7/20/2017 | | — |
| | 74.7 |
|
| — | | — |
| | 86.7 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.574% - 0.591% | | 8/17/2017 | | — |
| | 86.6 |
|
| — | | — |
| | 34.8 |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.696% - 0.934% | | 9/14/2017 | | — |
| | 34.8 |
|
| 17.8 | | 17.8 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 1.036% - 1.177% | | 1/2/2018 | | 17.8 |
| | — |
|
| 75.0 | 75.0 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.315% - 0.426% | | 2/9/2017 | | 75.0 |
| | — |
| 75.0 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 1.063% - 1.084% | | 1/4/2018 | | 75.0 |
| | — |
|
| 48.0 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.325% - 0.437% | | 2/16/2017 | | 48.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 48.0 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.448% - 0.473% | | 2/23/2017 | | 48.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 21.2 | | 21.2 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 1.128% - 1.236% | | 1/11/2018 | | 21.2 |
| | — |
|
| 40.0 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 1.114% | | 1/18/2018 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
|
| 71.0 | | 71.0 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 1.132% | | 1/25/2018 | | 70.9 |
| | — |
|
| 36.0 | 36.0 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.368% - 0.477% | | 3/2/2017 | | 36.0 |
| | — |
| 36.0 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 1.106% | | 2/1/2018 | | 36.0 |
| | — |
|
| 48.7 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.386% - 0.518% | | 3/9/2017 | | 48.7 |
| | — |
| |
| 59.9 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.406% - 0.481% | | 3/16/2017 | | 60.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 129.0 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.380% - 0.533% | | 3/23/2017 | | 129.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 25.9 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.396% - 0.518% | | 3/30/2017 | | 25.9 |
| | — |
| |
| 58.9 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.411% | | 4/6/2017 | | 58.9 |
| | — |
| |
| 130.8 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.518% - 0.529% | | 4/13/2017 | | 130.8 |
| | — |
| |
| 49.9 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.514% - 0.559% | | 4/20/2017 | | 49.9 |
| | — |
| |
| 48.2 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.554% - 0.569% | | 4/27/2017 | | 48.2 |
| | — |
| |
| 49.9 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.514% | | 5/4/2017 | | 49.9 |
| | — |
| |
| 42.0 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.601% - 0.623% | | 5/11/2017 | | 42.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 30.1 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.620% | | 5/18/2017 | | 30.1 |
| | — |
| |
| 32.0 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.587% | | 6/8/2017 | | 32.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 74.8 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.541% - 0.654% | | 7/20/2017 | | 74.7 |
| | — |
| |
| 86.7 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.574% - 0.591% | | 8/17/2017 | | 86.6 |
| | — |
| |
| 34.8 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 0.696% | | 9/14/2017 | | 34.8 |
| | — |
| |
| 93.0 | | 93.0 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 1.075% - 1.077% | | 2/8/2018 | | 92.9 |
| | — |
|
| 98.0 | | 98.0 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 1.106% - 1.122% | | 2/22/2018 | | 97.8 |
| | — |
|
| 81.0 | | 81.0 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 1.060% - 1.117% | | 3/1/2018 | | 80.8 |
| | — |
|
| 154.0 | | 154.0 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 1.374% - 1.433% | | 3/29/2018 | | 153.5 |
| | — |
|
| 24.0 | | 24.0 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 1.440% | | 5/24/2018 | | 23.9 |
| | — |
|
| 85.0 | | 85.0 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Bills | | 1.432% | | 6/7/2018 | | 84.5 |
| | — |
|
| — | — |
| | 11.0 |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.104% | | 1/15/2016 | | — |
| | 11.0 |
| — |
| | 69.9 |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.431% - 0.451% | | 1/31/2017 | | — |
| | 69.9 |
|
| — | — |
| | 47.0 |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.226% | | 2/11/2016 | | — |
| | 47.0 |
| — |
| | 46.9 |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.441% - 0.471% | | 2/15/2017 | | — |
| | 47.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 19.7 |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.176% - 0.223% | | 2/29/2016 | | — |
| | 19.6 |
| — |
| | 49.7 |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.502% | | 2/28/2017 | | — |
| | 49.7 |
|
| — | — |
| | 50.0 |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.149% - 0.168% | | 3/15/2016 | | — |
| | 50.0 |
| — |
| | 50.0 |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.542% | | 3/15/2017 | | — |
| | 50.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 50.0 |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.207% | | 3/31/2016 | | — |
| | 50.0 |
| — |
| | 50.0 |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.515% | | 3/31/2017 | | — |
| | 50.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 92.0 |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.192% - 0.243% | | 4/15/2016 | | — |
| | 91.9 |
| — |
| | 69.6 |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.550% - 0.621% | | 5/31/2017 | | — |
| | 69.6 |
|
| — | — |
| | 50.0 |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.381% | | 5/31/2016 | | — |
| | 50.0 |
| — |
| | 40.1 |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.580% | | 6/15/2017 | | — |
| | 40.1 |
|
| — | — |
| | 46.4 |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.433% | | 6/15/2016 | | — |
| | 46.4 |
| — |
| | 50.0 |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.586% | | 6/30/2017 | | — |
| | 50.0 |
|
| — | — |
| | 35.0 |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.494% | | 6/30/2016 | | — |
| | 35.0 |
| — |
| | 30.0 |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.668% - 0.710% | | 7/31/2017 | | — |
| | 30.0 |
|
| — |
| | 50.0 |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.287% | | 7/15/2016 | | — |
| | 50.0 |
| |
| — |
| | 50.0 |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.367% - 0.376% | | 8/15/2016 | | — |
| | 50.0 |
| |
| 69.9 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.431% - 0.451% | | 1/31/2017 | | 69.9 |
| | — |
| |
| 46.9 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.441% - 0.471% | | 2/15/2017 | | 47.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 49.7 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.502% | | 2/28/2017 | | 49.7 |
| | — |
| |
| 50.0 | 50.0 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.542% | | 3/15/2017 | | 50.0 |
| | — |
| 50.0 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 1.148% - 1.180% | | 1/31/2018 | | 50.0 |
| | — |
|
| 50.0 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.515% | | 3/31/2017 | | 50.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 69.6 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.550% - 0.621% | | 5/31/2017 | | 69.6 |
| | — |
| |
| 40.1 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.580% | | 6/15/2017 | | 40.1 |
| | — |
| |
| 50.0 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.586% | | 6/30/2017 | | 50.0 |
| | — |
| |
| 40.0 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 1.175% - 1.184% | | 2/15/2018 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
|
| 48.0 | | 48.0 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 1.200% | | 2/28/2018 | | 47.9 |
| | — |
|
| 40.0 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 1.179% | | 3/15/2018 | | 40.0 |
| | — |
|
| 43.1 | | 43.1 |
| | — |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 1.333% - 1.378% | | 6/15/2018 | | 43.0 |
| | — |
|
TOTAL UNITED STATES TREASURY SECURITIES (Cost $1,015.3 and $1,745.0) | | TOTAL UNITED STATES TREASURY SECURITIES (Cost $1,015.3 and $1,745.0) | | $ | 1,015.2 |
| | $ | 1,744.9 |
|
TOTAL OTHER MARKETABLE SECURITIES (Cost $3,888.1 and $4,054.0) | | TOTAL OTHER MARKETABLE SECURITIES (Cost $3,888.1 and $4,054.0) | | $ | 3,887.5 |
| | $ | 4,053.8 |
|
TOTAL MARKETABLE SECURITIES (Cost $4,879.1 and $4,937.9) | | TOTAL MARKETABLE SECURITIES (Cost $4,879.1 and $4,937.9) | | $ | 5,125.5 |
| | $ | 5,135.3 |
|
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Principal | | Issuer | | Yield(4) | | Maturity Date | | Fair Value at December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| $ | 30.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | United States Treasury Notes | | 0.206% | | | 7/31/2017 | | $ | 30.0 |
| | $ | — |
|
TOTAL UNITED STATES TREASURY SECURITIES (Cost $1,745.0 and $1,540.7) | | $ | 1,744.9 |
| | $ | 1,540.4 |
|
TOTAL OTHER MARKETABLE SECURITIES (Cost $4,054.0 and $4,207.7) | | $ | 4,053.8 |
| | $ | 4,207.2 |
|
TOTAL MARKETABLE SECURITIES (Cost $4,937.9 and $5,067.2) | | | | $ | 5,135.3 |
| | $ | 5,231.6 |
|
LOANS RECEIVABLE—1.1% and 0.4%1.1%
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Borrower | | Interest Rate(7) | | | | | | |
| | | | | DJM Capital Partners | | 4.200% | (8) | | 7/1/2018 | | $ | 32.3 |
| | $ | — |
|
| | | | | Simply Self Storage Portfolio | | 8.250% | | | 9/6/2021 | | 37.6 |
| | — |
|
| | | | | State Street Financial Center Junior Mezz | | 6.500% | | | 11/10/2021 | | 125.2 |
| | — |
|
| | | | | Charles River Plaza North | | 6.080% | | | 4/6/2029 | | 100.6 |
| | 100.6 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LOANS RECEIVABLE
(Cost $294.8 and $100.0) | | | | $ | 295.7 |
| | $ | 100.6 |
|
TOTAL INVESTMENTS
(Cost $22,581.2 and $20,627.6) | | | | $ | 26,643.7 |
| | $ | 24,151.6 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Maturity Date | | Fair Value at December 31, |
| | | | | Borrower | | Interest Rate(7) | | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| | | | | DJM Capital Partners(8) | | 4.200% | | | 7/1/2018 | | $ | 34.2 |
| | $ | 32.3 |
|
| | | | | Simply Self Storage Portfolio | | 8.250% | | | 9/6/2021 | | 37.6 |
| | 37.6 |
|
| | | | | State Street Financial Center Junior Mezz | | 6.500% | | | 11/10/2021 | | 125.1 |
| | 125.2 |
|
| | | | | Charles River Plaza North | | 6.080% | | | 4/6/2029 | | 101.9 |
| | 100.6 |
|
TOTAL LOANS RECEIVABLE
(Cost $296.7 and $294.8) | | | | $ | 298.8 |
| | $ | 295.7 |
|
TOTAL INVESTMENTS
(Cost $22,823.6 and $22,581.2) | | | | $ | 27,170.0 |
| | $ | 26,643.7 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
(1) | The investment has a mortgage loan payable outstanding, as indicated in Note 8. |
| |
(2) | The fair value reflects the Account’sAccount's interest in the joint venture and is net of debt. |
| |
(3) | Properties within this investment are located throughout the United States. |
| |
(4) | Yield represents the annualized yield. |
| |
(5) | The assets held in this investment were liquidated on February 18, 2015; the investment is currently in dissolution.2015, with final dissolution on December 13, 2017. |
| |
(6) | A partial disposition of assets held by the portfolio was completed on June 27, 2016.February 1, 2017. |
| |
(7) | Represents the fixed interest rate on thethis investment. |
| |
(8) | This loan has the option to increase the principal balance up to $35.0 million and includes a one year extension option at a 5.0% annual interest-onlyinterest only rate. |
| |
(9) | All or a portion of these securities are out on loan. The aggregate value of securities on loan is $91.2$18.1 million. |
| |
(10) | The assets held in this investment were in liquidation as of May 2014, with final dissolution expected in 2018. |
| |
(11) | A partial disposition of assets held by the portfolio was completed on August 17, 2017. |
| |
(12) | A portion of this investment consists of land for development that was acquired on December 19, 2017. |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Participants of TIAA Real Estate Account and the Board of Trustees of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America:America and Participants of TIAA Real Estate Account
In our opinion,Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of assets and liabilities, including the consolidated schedules of investments, of the TIAA Real Estate Account and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, of changes in net assets and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of TIAA Real Estatethe Account and its subsidiaries (the “Account”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and 2015, the results of their operations the changes in their net assets and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20162017 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Account’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Account’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Account in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. Anmisstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Account is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit includesof its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Account's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, andas well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
March 15, 2018
March 20, 2017We have served as the Account's auditor since 2005.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
Not applicable.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
(a) The registrant maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the registrant’s reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the registrant’s Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”) and the Principal Financial Officer (“PFO”), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Under the supervision and participation of the registrant’s management, including the registrant’s PEO and PFO, the registrant conducted an evaluation (as required under Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) under the Exchange Act, under the supervision and with the participation of our PEO and PFO, of the effectiveness of the registrant’sour disclosure controls and procedures as(as defined in RuleRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of December 31, 2016.Act). Based upon management’s review, the PEO and the PFO concluded with reasonable assurance that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2016.2017.
(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Account. The Account’s internalreporting. Internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f), is a process designed by, or under the supervision of the Account’s PEO and PFO to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Account’s consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management has made a comprehensive review, evaluation, and assessment of the Account’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.2017. In making its assessment of internal control over financial reporting, management used the criteria issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013 Framework). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that as of December 31, 2016,2017, the Account’s internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the registrant’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Registrant’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.
(c) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There have been no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s last fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
PART III
ITEMS 10 AND 11. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF THE REGISTRANT; EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
The TIAA Real Estate Account has no officers or directorsdirectors. Rather, TIAA officers, under the direction and nocontrol of the Board, manage the investment of the Account's assets, following investment management procedures that TIAA has adopted for the Account. No TIAA trustee or executive officer receives compensation from the Account. The Trustees and certain principal executive officers of TIAA as of March 1, 2017,2018, their datesyears of birth and their principal occupations during at least the last five years, are as follows:
Trustees
Ronald L. Thompson (Chairman), DOB: 6/17/49YOB: 1949
Director, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (2014 to present). Member, Plymouth Ventures Partnership II Advisory Board (2010 to present). Director, Medical University of South Carolina Foundation (2013 to present), and Trustee, Washington University in St. Louis.
Louis (1987 to 2013 and 2014 to present).
Jeffrey R. Brown, DOB: 2/16/68YOB: 1968
Josef and Margot Lakonishok Professor of Business and Dean of the Gies College of Business at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (since 2015)(2015 to present). Professor of Finance and Director of the Center for Business and Public Policy, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (since 2007)(2007 to present).
Board Member, Center for Audit Quality (2016 to present).
James R. Chambers, DOB: 9/19/57YOB: 1957
Special Advisor, Board, Weight Watchers International, Inc. (2016 to present)(2016). Director, President and Chief Executive Officer (2012 to 2016), Weight Watchers International, Inc. President, US Snacks and Confectionary at Kraft Foods (2010 to 2012). Director, Big Lots, Inc. (2012 to present).
Lisa W. Hess, DOB: 8/8/55YOB: 1955
President and Managing Partner, SkyTop Capital (since 2010)(2010 to present).
Director, Radian Group, Inc. (2011 to present).
Edward M. Hundert, M.D., DOB: 10/1/56YOB: 1956
Harvard University Medical School, Dean for Medical Education and Daniel D. Federman, M.D. Professor in Residence of Global Health and Social Medicine and Medical Education, (since 2014)Harvard University Medical School (2014 to present). Senior lecturer in Medical Ethics (2007 to 2014), and Director of the Center for Teaching and Learning, Harvard Medical School (2011 to 2014).
Lawrence H. Linden, DOB: 2/19/47YOB: 1947
Founding Trustee, of the Linden Trust for Conservation (1993 to present), Member of the Board of Directors of theDirector, World Wildlife Fund and(2002 to present). Advisory Director, to the Redstone Strategy Group (2006 to present). Strategic Advisory Board Member, New World Capital Group (2011 to present).
Maureen O’Hara, DOB: 6/13/53YOB: 1953
R.W. Purcell Professor of Finance, at Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University (since 1992)(1992 to present), where she has taught since 1979.
Professor of Finance, University of Technology Sydney (2016 to present).
Donald K. Peterson, DOB: 8/13/49YOB: 1949
Director, Sanford C. Bernstein Fund Inc. (2007 to present) and. Director, Bernstein Fund Inc. (2015 to present). Trustee Emeritus, of Worcester Polytechnic Institute (2015 to present).
Sidney A. Ribeau, DOB: 12/3/47YOB: 1947
Professor of Communications, Howard University (since 2014)(2014 to present). President, Howard University (2008 to 2013). Co-founder, TM2 Education Search (2016 to present).
Director, Worthington Industries (2000 to present).
Dorothy K. Robinson, DOB: 2/18/51YOB: 1951
Of Counsel, at K&L Gates (since 2016)(2016 to present). Former Senior Counselor to the President, of Yale University (2014 to 2015). Vice President and General Counsel, Yale University (1995 to 2014).
Kim M. Sharan, DOB: 10/20/57YOB: 1957
Founder and CEO, Kim M. Sharan, LLC Founder and CEO, (2004 to present). President of Financial Planning and Wealth Strategies and Chief Marketing Officer, at Ameriprise Financial (2002 to 2014).
Board Member, Partner Here (2014 to present). Director, Girls Inc. (2014 to present).
David L. Shedlarz, DOB: 4/17/48YOB: 1948
Director, Pitney Bowes Inc. (2001 to present),. Director, The Hershey Company (2008 to present), and. Director, Teladoc, Inc. (2016 to present).
Marta Tienda, DOB: 8/10/50YOB: 1950
Maurice P. During ’22 Professor in Demographic Studies and Professor of Sociology and Public Affairs, Princeton University (since 1999).
Director, Novume Solutions (2017 to present). Board Chair (2017 to present), Trustee (2004 to present), Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. Trustee, Jacobs Foundation of Switzerland (1999 to present). Board member, Robin Hood Foundation (2017 to present).
Officer—Trustees
Roger W. Ferguson, Jr., DOB: 10/28/51YOB: 1951
President and Chief Executive Officer of TIAA and CREF (since 2008).
Other TIAA Executive Officers
Carol W. Deckbar, DOB: 9/13/62YOB: 1962
Executive Vice President, Institutional Investment and Endowment Services of TIAA and Executive Vice President of CREF. Prior Positions:positions: Executive Vice President, CEO, TIAA-CREF CEO, Asset Management; TIAA-CREF,Management at TIAA; Executive Vice President, COO Asset Management.Management at TIAA.
Virginia M. Wilson, DOB: 7/22/54YOB: 1954
Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of TIAA and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of CREF. Prior position: Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of TIAA.
Ronald Pressman, DOB: 4/11/58YOB: 1958
Senior Executive Vice President, Institutional Financial Services Chief Executive Officer of TIAA, and Executive Vice President of the TIAA-CREF Fund Complex. Prior positions: Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer atof TIAA. President and Chief Executive Officer of General Electric Capital Real Estate.
Kathie J. Andrade, DOB: 9/7/60YOB: 1960
Senior Executive Vice President, Retail Financial Services Chief Executive Officer.Officer of TIAA. Prior position: Executive Vice President, Head of Individual Advisory Services of TIAA.
Portfolio Management Team
Gerald Casimir,Randy Giraldo, DOB: 10/16/59YOB: 1975
Managing Director, and Portfolio Manager, Head of TIAA Real Estate Account. Head of Portfolio Management for THRE division of Nuveen. Prior position: Head of U.S. Real Estate Asset Management.
Managing Director.
Gordon (Chris) McGibbon, DOB: 11/25/72YOB: 1972
Senior Managing Director, Head of Americas, TH Real Estate. Prior positions: Managing Director, PM of GA Mortgage and Real Estate Portfolios, TIAA. Managing Director, PM of Direct, Flagship Open Ended Real Estate Fund.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
On February 10, 2016, the Board of Trustees of TIAA determined that Lisa W. Hess and Donald K. Peterson qualify as Audit Committee Financial Experts. Each such Trustee is independent (as that term is used in Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) and has not accepted, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from TIAA, other than in his or her capacity as Trustee.
Code of Ethics
The Board of Trustees of TIAA has adopted a code of ethics for senior financial officers, including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, or controller, and persons performing similar functions, in conformity with rules promulgated under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
The code of ethics is filed as an exhibit to this annual report.
During the reporting period, there were no implicit or explicit waivers granted by the Registrant from any provision of the code of ethics.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
Not applicable.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.
The TIAA general accountGeneral Account plays a significant role in operating the Real Estate Account, including providing a liquidity guarantee, and investment advisory, administrative, and other services. In addition, Services, a wholly-owned subsidiary of TIAA, provides distribution services for the Account.
Liquidity Guarantee. If the Account’s liquid assets and its cash flow from operating activities and participant transactions are insufficient to fund redemption requests, the TIAA general account has agreed to purchase liquidity units. TIAA thereby guarantees that a participant can redeem accumulation units at their net asset value next determined. For the year ended December 31, 2016,2017, the Account expensed $38.4$47.0 million for this liquidity guarantee from TIAA through a daily deduction from the net assets of the Account.
Investment Advisory and Administration Services/Mortality and Expense Risks Borne by TIAA. Deductions are made each valuation day from the net assets of the Account for various services required to manage investments, administer the Account and distribute the contracts. These services are performed at cost by TIAA and Services. Deductions are also made each valuation day to cover mortality and expense risks borne by TIAA.
For the year ended December 31, 2016,2017, the Account expensed $72.6$72.0 million for investment management services and $1.2 million for mortality and expense risks provided/borne by TIAA. For the same period, the Account expensed $89.8$85.0 million for administrative and distribution services provided by TIAA and Services.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) performs independent audits of the registrant’s consolidated financial statements. To maintain auditor independence and avoid even the appearance of conflicts of interest, the registrant, as a policy, does not engage PwC for management advisory or consulting services.
Audit Fees. PwC’s fees for professional services rendered for the audits of the registrant’s annual consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 20162017 and 20152016 and review of consolidated financial statements included in the registrant’s quarterly reports were $1,163,900$1,198,800 and $1,130,000$1,163,900 respectively.
Audit-Related Fees. The registrant had no audit-related services for the years ended December 31, 20162017 and 2015.2016.
Tax Fees. PwC had no tax fees with respect to registrant for the years ended December 31, 20162017 and 2015.2016.
All Other Fees. Other than as set forth above, there were no additional fees with respect to registrant.
Preapproval Policy. In June of 2003, the audit committee of TIAA’sthe Board of Trustees (“Audit Committee”) adopted a Preapproval Policy for External Audit Firm Services (the “Policy”), which applies to the registrant. The Policy describes the types of services that may be provided by the independent auditor to the registrant without impairing the auditor’s independence. Under the Policy, the Audit Committee is required to preapprove services to be performed by the registrant’s independent auditor in order to ensure that such services do not impair the auditor’s independence.
The Policy requires the Audit Committee to: (i) appoint the independent auditor to perform the financial statement audit for the registrant and certain of its affiliates, including approving the terms of the engagement and (ii) preapprove the audit, audit-related and tax services to be provided by the independent auditor and the fees to be charged for provision of such services from year to year.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES. |
| | |
| (1) | (A) | Distribution Agreement for the Contracts Funded by the TIAA Real Estate Account, dated as of January 1, 2008, by and among Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, for itself and on behalf of the Account, and TIAA-CREF Individual & Institutional Services, LLC4 |
| |
|
| (3) | (A) | Restated Charter of TIAA (as amended)5 |
| | | |
| (B) | Amended Bylaws of TIAA6 |
| | |
| (4) | (A) | Forms of RA, GRA, GSRA, SRA, IRA Real Estate Account Endorsements,2 Keogh Contract,3Retirement Select and Retirement Select Plus Contracts and Endorsements1and Retirement Choice and Retirement Choice Plus Contracts3 |
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| (B) | Forms of Income-Paying Contracts2 |
| | |
| | (C) | Form of Contract Endorsement for Internal Transfer Limitation7 |
| | | |
| (D) | Form of Non-ERISA Retirement Choice Plus Contract*9 |
| | |
| | |
| | (E) | Form of Trust Company Retirement Choice Contract*10 |
| | |
| | |
| | (F) | Form of Trust Company Retirement Choice Plus Contract11 |
| | |
| | |
| (G) | |
| (H) | |
| (I) | |
| (10) | (A) | Amended and Restated Independent Fiduciary Letter Agreement, dated as of February 2, 2015,21, 2018, between TIAA, on behalf of the Registrant, and RERC, LLC812 |
| | |
| | (B) | Custodian Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2008, by and between TIAA, on behalf of the Registrant, and State Street Bank and Trust Company, N.A.98 |
| | |
| (14) | | |
| (31) | | |
| (32) | | |
| (101) | | The following financial information from the annual report on Form 10-K for the periods ended December 31, 2016,2017, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Statements of Assets and Liabilities, (ii) the Statements of Operations, (iii) the Statements of Changes in Net Assets, (iv) the Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) the Notes to the Financial Statements. Any other required schedule has been omitted because the schedule is not applicable to the registrant.** |
| |
| ** | Furnished electronically herewith. |
| |
| (1) | Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4(A) to the Account’s Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April 29, 2004 (File No. 333-113602). |
| |
| (2) | Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference to the Account’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April 30, 1996 (File No. 33-92990). |
| |
| (3) | Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference to the Account’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed May 2, 2005 (File No. 333-121493). |
| |
| (4) | Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1(A) to the Account’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the Commission on March 15, 2013 (File No. 333-187309). |
| |
| (5) | Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(A) to the Account’s Registration Statement On Form S-1, filed with the Commission on April 22, 2015 (File No. 333-202583). |
| |
| (6) | Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(B) to the Account’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the Commission on April 22, 2015 (File No. 333-202583). |
| |
| (7) | Previously filed and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(C) to the Account’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 and filed with the Commission on November 12, 2010 (File No. 33-92990). |
| |
| (8) | Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Account’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on February 6, 2015 (File No. 33-92990). |
| |
(9) | Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.(b)10(B) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Account for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 and filed with the Commission on March 14, 2013 (File No. 33-92990). |
| |
| (9) | Previously filed and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(D)(1) and 4(D)(2) to the Account's Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the Commission on March 21, 2017 (File No. 333-216849). |
| |
| (10) | Previously filed and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(E)(1) and 4(E)(2) to the Account's Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the Commission on March 21, 2017 (File No. 333-216849). |
| |
| (11) | Previously filed and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(F)(1) and 4(F)(2) to the Account's Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the Commission on March 21, 2017 (File No. 333-216849). |
| |
| (12) | Previously filed and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Account's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on March 1, 2018 (File No. 33-92990). |
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY.
Not applicable.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant, TIAA Real Estate Account, has duly caused this annual report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in New York, New York, on the 20th15th day of March, 2017.2018.
|
| | |
| | TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT |
| | | |
| | By: | TEACHERS INSURANCE AND ANNUITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA |
| | | |
March 20, 201715, 2018 | | /s/ Carol W. Deckbar |
| | | Carol W. Deckbar |
| | | Executive Vice President, Institutional Investment & Endowment Services |
| | | Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Report has been signed by the following trustees and officers of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
| | | | |
| Signature | | Title | | Date |
/s/ ROGER W. FERGUSON, JR. | | President and Chief Executive Officer of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America and Trustee | | March 20, 201715, 2018 |
/s/ CAROL W. DECKBAR | | Executive Vice President, Institutional Investment & Endowment Services of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (Principal Executive Officer) | | March 20, 201715, 2018 |
/s/ VIRGINIA M. WILSON | | Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | | March 20, 201715, 2018 |
/s/ RONALD L. THOMPSON | | Chairman of the Board of Trustees | | March 20, 201715, 2018 |
/s/ JEFFREY R. BROWN | | Trustee | | March 20, 201715, 2018 |
/s/ JAMES R. CHAMBERS | | Trustee | | March 20, 201715, 2018 |
/s/ LISA W. HESS | | Trustee | | March 20, 201715, 2018 |
/s/ EDWARD M. HUNDERT, M.D. | | Trustee | | March 20, 201715, 2018 |
/s/ LAWRENCE H. LINDEN | | Trustee | | March 20, 201715, 2018 |
/s/ MAUREEN O’HARA | | Trustee | | March 20, 201715, 2018 |
/s/ DONALD K. PETERSON | | Trustee | | March 20, 201715, 2018 |
/s/ SIDNEY A. RIBEAU | | Trustee | | March 20, 201715, 2018 |
/s/ DOROTHY K. ROBINSON | | Trustee | | March 20, 201715, 2018 |
/s/ KIM M. SHARAN | | Trustee | | March 20, 201715, 2018 |
/s/ DAVID L. SHEDLARZ | | Trustee | | March 20, 201715, 2018 |
/s/ MARTA TIENDA | | Trustee | | March 20, 201715, 2018 |
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHED WITH REPORTS FILED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 15(D) OF THE ACT BY REGISTRANTS WHICH HAVE NOT REGISTERED
SECURITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE ACT
Because the Registrant has no voting securities, nor its own management or board of directors, no annual report or proxy materials will be sent to contract owners holding interests in the Account.