UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
| | | | |
þ☑ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019
2022 |
| | | | |
| ☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-36569
|
| |
| LANTHEUS HOLDINGS, INC. |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
_______________________________________________________________ |
| | | | | | | |
| Delaware | | 35-2318913 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
331 Treble Cove201 Burlington Road, North Billerica,South Building, Bedford, MA | | 0186201730 |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (978) 671-8001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Title of Each Class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
| Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share | LNTH | NASDAQ Global Market |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐þ No þ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes þ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Large accelerated filer | | þ | | Accelerated filer | | ☐ |
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer | | þ
| | Accelerated filer | | ☐ |
| | | | | | |
| Non-accelerated filer | | ☐ | | Smaller reporting company | | ☐ |
| | | | | | |
| | | | Emerging growth company | | ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☑
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act) Yes ☐ No þ
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 20192022 was approximately $1,090.9$4,487.0 million based on the last reported sale price of the registrant’s common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market on June 28, 201930, 2022 of $28.30$66.03 per share.
As of February 19, 202016, 2023 the registrant had 39,252,65167,540,065 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, issued and outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Listed hereunder are the documents, portions of which are incorporated by reference, and the parts of this Form 10-K into which such portions are incorporated:
The Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement for use in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 23, 2020,27, 2023, portions of which are incorporated by reference into Parts II and III of this Form 10-K. The 20202023 Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the close of our year ended December 31, 2019.
LANTHEUS HOLDINGS, INC.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Unless the context requires otherwise, references to “Lantheus,” “the Company,” “our company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Lantheus Holdings, Inc. and, as the context requires, its direct and indirect subsidiaries, references to “Lantheus Holdings” refer to Lantheus Holdings, Inc. and references to “LMI” refer to Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary.
Some of the statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements, including, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies, prospects and industry estimates, are subject to risks and uncertainties. These statements identify prospective information and includecan generally be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “intends,“believes,” “plans,“can,” “seeks,” “believes,“could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “should,“hopes,” “could,“intends,” “launch,” “may,” “pipeline,” “plans,” “predicts,” “hopes”“seeks,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions.expressions, or by express or implied discussions regarding potential marketing approvals or new indications for the collaborations, products candidates or approved products described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, or regarding potential future revenues from such collaborations, product candidates and products. Examples of forward-looking statements include statements we make relating to our outlook and expectations including, without limitation, in connection with: (i) continued
•Continued market expansion and penetration for our established commercial products, particularly PYLARIFY and DEFINITY, in the face of segment competitioncompetition;
•Our ability to have third parties manufacture our products and potential generic competition as a resultour ability to manufacture DEFINITY in our in-house manufacturing facility;
•The global availability of patent and regulatory exclusivity expirations; (ii) the global Molybdenum-99 (“Mo-99”) supply; (iii)and other raw materials and key components;
•The efforts and timing for clinical development, regulatory approval and successful commercialization of our product candidates and new clinical applications and territories for our products, manufactured at Jubilant HollisterStier (“JHS”); (iv)in each case, that we or our efforts in new product development;strategic partners may undertake;
•Our strategies, future prospects, and (v) our proposed acquisition (the “Progenics Transaction”) of Progenics Pharmaceuticals,projected growth, including revenue related to our collaboration agreements with POINT Biopharma Global Inc. (“Progenics”POINT”). ;
•Our ability to identify and acquire or in-license additional diagnostic and therapeutic product opportunities in oncology and other strategic areas; and
•The continuing impact of the global COVID-19 pandemic and other challenges on our business, supply chain, financial conditions and prospects.
Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the economy and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, such statements are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. These statements are neither statements of historical fact nor guarantees or assurances of future performance. The matters referred to in the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may not in fact occur. We caution you, therefore, against relying on any of these forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in theThese forward-looking statements include regional, national or global political, economic, business, competitive, market and regulatory conditions and the following:
Our ability to continue to grow the appropriate use of DEFINITY in suboptimal echocardiograms in the face of segment competition from other echocardiography contrast agents, including Optison from GE Healthcare Limited (“GE Healthcare”) and Lumason from Bracco Diagnostics Inc. (“Bracco”), and potential generic competition as a result of patent and regulatory exclusivity expirations;
The instability of the global Mo-99 supply, including (i) periodic outages at the NTP Radioisotopes (“NTP”) processing facility in South Africa in 2017, 2018 and 2019 and (ii) a current on-going outage at the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation’s (“ANSTO”) new Mo-99 processing facility in Australia, in each case resulting in our inability to fill some or all of the demand for our TechneLite generators on certain manufacturing days during the outage periods;
Our dependence upon third parties for the manufacture and supply of a substantial portion of our products, raw materials and components, including DEFINITY at JHS;
The extensive costs, time and uncertainty associated with new product development, including further product development relying on external development partners or developing internally;
Our ability to identify and acquire or in-license additional products, businesses or technologies to drive our future growth;
Our ability to protect our intellectual property and the risk of claims that we have infringed on the intellectual property of others;
Risks associated with the technology transfer programs to secure production of our products at additional contract manufacturer sites, including a modified formulation of DEFINITY at Samsung BioLogics (“SBL”) in South Korea;
Risks associated with our investment in, and construction of, additional specialized manufacturing capabilities at our North Billerica, Massachusetts facility, including our ability to bring the new capabilities online by 2021;
Our dependence on key customers for our medical imaging products, and our ability to maintain and profitably renew our contracts with those key customers, including GE Healthcare, Cardinal Health (“Cardinal”), United Pharmacy Partners (“UPPI”), Jubilant Radiopharma formerly known as Triad Isotopes, Inc. (“Jubilant Radiopharma”) and PharmaLogic Holdings Corp (“PharmaLogic”);
Risks associated with our lead agent in development, flurpiridaz F 18, which in 2017 we out-licensed to GE Healthcare, including:
The ability to successfully complete the Phase 3 development program;
The ability to obtain Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) approval; and
The ability to gain post-approval market acceptance and adequate reimbursement;
Risks associated with our development agent, LMI 1195, for patient populations that would benefit from molecular imaging of the norepinephrine pathway, including designing and timely completing two Phase 3 clinical trials for the diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumors in pediatric and adult populations, respectively;
Risks associated with the manufacturing and distribution of our products and the regulatory requirements related thereto;
The dependence of certain of our customers upon third-party healthcare payors and the uncertainty of third-party coverage and reimbursement rates;
The existence and market success of competitor products;
Uncertainties regarding the impact of U.S. and state healthcare reform measures and proposals on our business, including measures and proposals related to reimbursement for our current and potential future products, controls over drug pricing, drug pricing transparency and generic drug competition;
Our beingare subject to extensive government regulationa number of risks, uncertainties and oversight, our ability to comply withassumptions, including those regulations and the costs of compliance;
Potential liability associated with our marketing and sales practices;
The occurrence of any serious or unanticipated side effects with our products;
Our exposure to potential product liability claims and environmental, health and safety liability;
Our ability to introduce new products and adapt to an evolving technology and medical practice landscape;
Risks associated with prevailing economic or political conditions and events and financial, business and other factors beyond our control;
Risks associated with our international operations, including potential global disruptions in air transport due to COVID-19 (coronavirus), which could adversely affect our international supply chains for radioisotopes and other critical materials as well as international distribution channels for our commercial products;
Our ability to adequately qualify, operate, maintain and protect our facilities, equipment and technology infrastructure;
Our ability to hire or retain skilled employees and key personnel;
Our ability to utilize, or limitations in our ability to utilize, net operating loss carryforwards to reduce our future tax liability;
Risks related to our outstanding indebtedness and our ability to satisfy those obligations;
Costs and other risks associated with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Dodd-Frank Act, including in connection with becoming a large accelerated filer as of December 31, 2019;
Risks related to the ownership of our common stock;
| |
��� | Risks related to the Progenics Transaction, including: |
We or Progenics may be unable to obtain stockholder approval as required;
| |
▪ | Conditions to the closing of the Progenics Transaction may not be satisfied; |
| |
▪ | The Progenics Transaction may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays; |
| |
▪ | The ability of our or Progenics’ business to retain and hire key personnel and maintain relationships with customers, suppliers and others with whom we or Progenics do business, or on our or Progenics’ operating results and business generally; |
| |
▪ | Our or Progenics’ respective businesses may suffer as a result of uncertainty surrounding the Progenics Transaction and disruption of management’s attention due to the Progenics Transaction; |
| |
▪ | The occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances that could give rise to the termination of our agreement with Progenics; |
| |
▪ | Unanticipated risks to our integration plan including in connection with timing, talent, and the potential need for additional resources; |
| |
▪ | New or previously unidentified manufacturing, regulatory, or research and development issues in the Progenics business; |
| |
▪ | Risks that the anticipated benefits of the Progenics Transaction or other commercial opportunities may otherwise not be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected; |
| |
▪ | Risks that contractual contingent value rights (“CVRs”) we will issue as part of the Progenics Transaction may result in substantial future payments and could divert the attention of our management; |
| |
▪ | Risks that in connection with the Progenics Transaction, the exercise of appraisal rights by dissenting stockholders could increase the aggregate amount we have to pay for Progenics; |
We or Progenics may be adversely affected by other economic, business, and/or competitive factors;
| |
▪ | The impact of legislative, regulatory, competitive and technological changes; |
| |
▪ | Other risks to the consummation of the Progenics Transaction, including the risk that the Progenics Transaction will not be consummated within the expected time period or at all; and |
Other factors that are described in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of1A, "Risk Factors" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those that are discussed in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Any forward-looking statement made by us in this Annual Report on Form 10-K speaks only as of the date on which it is made. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by law.
SUMMARY OF MATERIAL RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH OUR BUSINESS TrademarksOur business is subject to a number of risks, including risks that may adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows, and prospects. These risks are discussed more fully below and include, but are not limited to, risks related to:
Risks Related to Our Portfolio of Commercial Products
•Our ability to continue to grow PYLARIFY as a commercial product, including (A) the ability of positron emission tomography (“PET”) manufacturing facilities (“PMFs”) to manufacture PYLARIFY to meet product demand, (B) our ability to sell PYLARIFY to customers, (C) our ability to obtain and maintain adequate coding, coverage and payment for PYLARIFY, (D) our ability to maintain PYLARIFY as the leading PSMA PET imaging agent in a competitive environment in which other PSMA PET imaging agents have been approved and additional ones are in development, and (E) our ability to obtain United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) approval for additional PMFs to manufacture PYLARIFY.
•Our ability to continue to grow the appropriate use of DEFINITY in suboptimal echocardiograms in the face of increased competition from other echocardiography ultrasound enhancing agents and potential generic competition as a result of patent and regulatory exclusivity expirations.
•Our ability to have third parties manufacture our products and our ability to manufacture DEFINITY in our in-house manufacturing facility.
•Our dependence on a limited number of third party suppliers for Mo-99, which is a critical ingredient of TechneLite.
•Risks related to RELISTOR, commercialized by Bausch, and that the revenues generated for us thereby may not meet expectations.
•Risks related to the manufacturing and commercialization of AZEDRA, including in connection with market acceptance and reimbursement, that may cause the product not to meet revenue or operating income expectations.
Risks Related to Reimbursement and Regulation
•The dependence of many of our customers upon third party healthcare payors and the uncertainty of third party coverage and reimbursement rates.
•Uncertainties regarding the impact of U.S. and state healthcare reform measures and proposals on our business, including measures and proposals related to reimbursement for our current and potential future products, controls over drug pricing, drug pricing transparency and generic drug competition.
•Our being subject to extensive government regulation and oversight, our ability to comply with those regulations and the costs of compliance.
Risks Related to our Business Operations and Financial Results
•Our ability to hire or retain the number of qualified personnel, particularly scientific, medical and sales personnel, required for our business.
•The impact of the ongoing global COVID-19 pandemic and other challenges on our business, financial condition or prospects, including: a decline in the volume of procedures and treatments using our products; potential delays and disruptions to global supply chains, manufacturing activities, logistics, operations, and clinical development programs; the business activities of our suppliers, distributors, customers and other business partners; and the effects on worldwide economies, financial markets, social institutions, labor markets and healthcare systems.
•Our ability to introduce new products and adapt to an evolving technology and medical practice landscape.
Risks Related to Our and our Strategic Partners’ Portfolios of Clinical Development Candidates
•Risks associated with the expected benefits and opportunities related to the POINT License Agreements (as defined below);
•Risks associated with Curium’s ability obtain regulatory approval for and successfully commercialize piflufolastat F 18 in Europe;
•Risks associated with [18F] flurpiridaz (“flurpiridaz”), which we out-licensed to GE Healthcare in 2017, including GE Healthcare’s ability to (A) obtain FDA approval, and (B) gain post-approval market acceptance and adequate coding, coverage and payment.
Risks Related to our Capital Structure
•Risks related to our outstanding indebtedness and our ability to satisfy those obligations, including the 2.625% Convertible Senior Notes due 2027 (the “Notes”).
•Risks related to the ownership of our common stock.
NOTE REGARDING COMPANY REFERENCES
Unless the context requires otherwise, references to “Lantheus,” “the Company,” “our company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Lantheus Holdings, Inc. and, as the context requires, its direct and indirect subsidiaries, references to “Lantheus Holdings” refer to Lantheus Holdings, Inc., references to “LMI” refer to Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary, references to “Progenics” refer to Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of LMI, and references to “EXINI” refer to EXINI Diagnostics AB, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Progenics.
NOTE REGARDING TRADEMARKS
We own or have the rights to various trademarks, service marks and trade names, including, among others, the following: DEFINITYPYLARIFY®, TechneLiteDEFINITY®, CardioliteAZEDRA®, Neurolite®, Vialmix®, Quadramet®, Luminity®and Lantheus Medical Imaging®Find.Fight.FollowTM referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Solely for convenience, we refer to trademarks and service marks in this Annual Report on Form 10-K without the TM, SM and ® symbols. Those references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we will not assert, to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law, our rights to our trademarks and service marks. Each trademark, trade name or service mark of any other company appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K such as Lumason®, OptisonTM, SonoVue®, Progenics®, Cerevast®, CarThera® and SonoCloud® are,is, to our knowledge, owned by that other company.
PART I
Item 1. Business
Overview
With more than 65 years of experience in delivering life-changing science, Lantheus is committed to improving patient outcomes through diagnostics, radiotherapeutics and artificial intelligence solutions that enable clinicians to Find, Fight and Follow disease. We classify our products in three categories: Precision Diagnostics, Radiopharmaceutical Oncology, and Strategic Partnerships and Other Revenue. Our leading Precision Diagnostic products assist healthcare professionals (“HCPs”) Find and Follow diseases, with a focus in cardiology. Our Radiopharmaceutical Oncology diagnostics and therapeutics help HCPs Find, Fight and Follow cancer. Our Strategic Partnerships focus on enabling precision medicine through the use of biomarkers, digital solutions and pharma services platforms, and also includes our license of RELISTOR to Bausch Health Companies, Inc. (“Bausch”).
Our commercial products are used by oncologists, urologists, nuclear medicine physicians, cardiologists, sonographers, technologists, radiologists, and internal medicine physicians working in a global leader in the development, manufacture and commercializationvariety of innovative diagnostic medical imaging agents and products that assist clinicians in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular and other diseases. Clinicians use our imaging agents and products across a range of imaging modalities, including echocardiography and nuclear imaging.clinical settings. We believe that the resultingour diagnostic products provide improved diagnostic information that enables healthcare providersHCPs to better detect and characterize, or rule out, disease, potentially achieving improvedwith the potential to achieve better patient outcomes, reducingreduce patient risk and limitinglimit overall costs for payers andthroughout the entire healthcare system.
Our commercialWe produce and market our products are used by cardiologists, nuclear physicians, radiologists, internal medicine physicians, technologiststhroughout the United States (the “United States” or the “U.S.”), selling primarily to hospitals, independent diagnostic testing facilities, government facilities, integrated delivery networks, radiopharmacies, clinics, and sonographers working in a variety of clinical settings.group practices. We sell our products to radiopharmacies, integrated delivery networks, hospitals, clinics and group practices.
We sell our products globally and currently operate our business in two reportable segments, which are further described below:
U.S. Segment produces and markets our medical imaging agents and products throughoutoutside the U.S. In the U.S., we primarily sell our products to radiopharmacies, integrated delivery networks, hospitals, clinics and group practices.
International Segment operations consistthrough a combination of production and distribution activities in Puerto Rico and some direct distribution activities in Canada. Additionally, within our International Segment, we have establishedCanada and maintain third-partythird party distribution relationships under which our products are marketed and sold in Europe, Canada, Australia, Asia-Pacific, Central America and LatinSouth America.
Our Product Portfolioexecutive offices are located in Bedford, MA, with additional offices in North Billerica, MA, Somerset, NJ, Montreal, Canada and Lund, Sweden.
Exclusive License for PNT2002 & PNT2003
On December 20, 2022, we announced the closing of a set of strategic collaborations with an affiliate of POINT, in which we were granted a license to exclusive worldwide rights (excluding Japan, South Korea, China (including Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan), Singapore and Indonesia) to co-develop and commercialize POINT’s PNT2002 and PNT2003 product candidates. PNT2002 is a prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy for the treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. PNT2003 is a somatostatin receptor targeted radioligand (“SSTR”) therapy with non-carrier added lutetium-177, and is in development to treat patients with SSTR-positive neuroendocrine tumors.
In exchange for these rights, we paid $260.0 million in upfront payments between the two agreements with POINT, with the potential for additional milestone payments of approximately $1.8 billion between the two products based on FDA approval, net sales and commercial milestones. Additionally, we will pay POINT royalties on net sales, beyond certain financial thresholds and subject to conditions, of 20% for PNT2002 and 15% for PNT2003. The license agreements expand our radiopharmaceutical portfolio with two late-stage therapeutic candidates and, with PNT2002, broadens our prostate cancer franchise. For more information, see Note 22, “Acquisition of Assets”, in our consolidated financial statements included herein.
Our current portfolioPortfolio of tenCommercial Products
Precision Diagnostics
Our commercial products in our Precision Diagnostics category include the following:
•DEFINITY is diversified across a range of imaging modalities. Our current products include an injectable ultrasound contrastenhancing agent and medical radiopharmaceuticals (including Technetium generators).
Ultrasound contrast agents are compoundswith perflutren-containing lipid microspheres, or microbubbles, that areis used in diagnostic procedures, suchechocardiography exams. One formulation of DEFINITY requires refrigerated storage. Another formulation, which we have branded as cardiac ultrasounds orDEFINITY RT, allows both storage and shipment at room temperature and provides clinicians an additional choice for greater utility of this formulation in broader clinical settings. The indication for both formulations in the U.S. is for use in patients with suboptimal echocardiograms to opacify the left ventricular chamber and to improve the claritydelineation of the diagnostic image.left ventricular endocardial border. We believe we are currently the leading worldwide provider of ultrasound enhancing agents.
Medical radiopharmaceuticals are radioactive pharmaceuticals•TechneLite is a Technetium (“Tc-99m”) generator that provides the essential nuclear material used by cliniciansradiopharmacies to performradiolabel NEUROLITE, CARDIOLITE and other Tc-99m-based radiopharmaceuticals used in nuclear medicine procedures. TechneLite uses Mo-99 as its active ingredient.
•NEUROLITE is an injectable, Tc-99m-labeled imaging procedures.
In certain circumstances, a radioactive element, or radioisotope, is attached to a chemical compound to form the radiopharmaceutical. This act of attaching the radioisotope to the chemical compound is called radiolabeling, or labeling.
In other circumstances, a radioisotope can beagent used as a radiopharmaceutical without attaching any additional chemical compound.
Radioisotopes are most commonly manufactured in a nuclear research reactor, where a target is bombarded with subatomic particles, or in a cyclotron, which is a type of particle accelerator that also creates radioisotopes.
Two common forms of nuclear imaging procedures are single-photon emission computed tomography (“SPECT”) which measures gamma rays emittedtechnology to identify the area within the brain where blood flow has been blocked or reduced due to stroke.
Although NEUROLITE’s patents and market exclusivity have expired, we are not currently aware of any generic competitors.
•Xenon-133 (“Xenon”) is a radiopharmaceutical gas that is inhaled and used to assess pulmonary function and also to image cerebral blood flow. Our Xenon is manufactured by a SPECT radiopharmaceutical,third party as a bi-product of Mo-99 production and positron emission tomography (“PET”) which measures positrons emittedis processed and finished by a PET radiopharmaceutical.us.
As•CARDIOLITE, also known by its generic name sestamibi, is an example of the procedures in which our products may beinjectable, Tc-99m-labeled imaging agent used in the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease, a typical diagnostic progression could include an electrocardiogram, followed by an echocardiogram (possibly using our agent DEFINITY) which delineates cardiac structure and function, and then a nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (“MPI”) study using either SPECT or PET imaging (possibly using our Technetium generator and our Cardiolite SPECT-based MPI agent). An MPI study assessesprocedures to assess blood flow distribution to the heart. MPI is also used for diagnosing the presence of coronary artery disease.
Progenics Transaction
On October 1, 2019, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Initial Merger Agreement”) to acquire Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: PGNX) in an all-stock transaction. Progenics is an oncology company developing innovative medicines and artificial intelligence to find, fight and follow cancer. Under the termsmuscle of the Initial Merger Agreement, we agreed to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of Progenics common stock at a fixed exchange ratio. Progenics stockholders would have received 0.2502 shares of our common stock for each share of Progenics common stock, representing an approximately 35% aggregate ownership stake in the combined company. The transaction contemplated by the Initial Merger Agreementheart using SPECT. CARDIOLITE was
unanimously approved by the Boards of Directors of both companiesFDA in 1990 and was subject toits market exclusivity expired in July 2008. Included in CARDIOLITE revenues are branded CARDIOLITE and generic sestamibi revenues.
Radiopharmaceutical Oncology
Our commercial products in our Radiopharmaceutical Oncology category include the terms and conditions set forthfollowing:
•PYLARIFY (also known as piflufolastat F 18, 18F-DCFPyL or PyL) is an F 18-labelled PSMA-targeted PET imaging agent used with PET/computed tomography (“CT”). PYLARIFY is indicated in the Initial Merger Agreement, including, among other things,U.S. for PET imaging of PSMA-positive lesions in men with prostate cancer with suspected metastasis who are candidates for initial definitive therapy and in men with suspected recurrence based on elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (“PSA”) levels.
•AZEDRA (iobenguane I 131) is a radiotherapeutic, approved for the affirmative votetreatment of patients 12 years and older with iobenguane scan positive, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma who require systemic anticancer therapy. AZEDRA is the first and only FDA-approved therapy for this indication.
Strategic Partnerships and Other Revenue
Our commercial products in our Strategic Partnerships and Other Revenue product category include the following:
•RELISTOR (methylnaltrexone bromide) is a majoritytreatment for opioid-induced constipation (“OIC”) that decreases the constipating side effects induced by opioid pain medications such as morphine and codeine without diminishing their ability to relieve pain. RELISTOR is approved in two forms: a subcutaneous injection and an oral tablet. We have licensed RELISTOR to Bausch, and we collect quarterly royalties based on RELISTOR sales.
•Automated Bone Scan Index (“aBSI”) automatically calculates the disease burden of prostate cancer by detecting and classifying bone scan tracer uptakes as metastatic or benign lesions using an artificial neural network. aBSI is FDA cleared and CE marked. The software is currently used as one of the outstanding shares of common stock of Progenics and a majority of votes cast by the holderscorrelative objectives of the common stockDORA trial, an open-labeled, randomized, phase III study of docetaxel versus docetaxel in combination with radium-223 (Ra-223) in subjects with mCRPC. aBSI is also approved in Japan and part of the Company.
On February 20, 2020, we entered into an AmendedJSMO guidelines (Japanese Society of Medical Oncology) in support of clinicians with patient treatment selection. The Japanese non-exclusive rights to aBSI have been transferred and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Amended Merger Agreement”sold to FUJIFILM Toyama Chemical Co. Ltd. (“FUJIFILM”) with Progenics, which amends and restates the Initial Merger Agreement. Under the terms of the Amended Merger Agreement, we will acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of Progenics common stock at a fixed exchange ratio whereby Progenics stockholders will receive, for each share of Progenics stock held at the time of the closing of the merger, 0.31 of a share of our common stock, increased from 0.2502 under the Initial Merger Agreement, together with a non-tradeable CVR tied toname BONENAVI®.
•aPROMISE, which is currently sold as PYLARIFY AI in the financial performance of PyLTM (18F-DCFPyL)U.S., Progenics’ prostate-specific membrane antigen targeted imaging agentis artificial intelligence medical device software that is designed to visualizeallow healthcare professionals and researchers to perform standardized quantitative assessment of PSMA PET/CT images in prostate cancer, currently in late stage clinical development (“PyL”). Each CVR will entitle its holder to receive a pro rata shareincluding those images obtained by using PYLARIFY.
Additional Information about our Product Categories
Precision Diagnostics
Continued Growth of aggregate cash payments equal to 40% of U.S. net sales generated by PyL in 2022 and 2023 in excess of $100 million and $150 million, respectively. In no event will our aggregate payments under the CVRs exceed 19.9% of the total consideration we pay in the transaction. As a result of the increase in the exchange ratio, following the completion of the merger, former Progenics stockholders’ aggregate ownership stake will increase to approximately 40% of the combined company from approximately 35% under the Initial Merger Agreement. Progenics’ stockholders will also now be entitled to appraisal rights as provided under Delaware law. The transaction contemplated by the Amended Merger Agreement was unanimously approved by the Boards of Directors of both companies and requires, among other things, the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock of Progenics and a majority of votes cast by the holders of the common stock of the Company.
In addition, pursuant to the Amended Merger Agreement, the holder of each in-the-money option to purchase shares of Progenics common stock under any equity based compensation plan of Progenics (“Progenics Stock Option”) will be entitled to receive in exchange for each such in-the-money option (i) an option to purchase Lantheus Common Stock (each, a “Lantheus Stock Option”) converted based on the 0.31 exchange ratio, and (ii) a vested or unvested CVR depending on whether the underlying option is vested. Holders of out-of-the-money Progenics Stock Options will receive Lantheus Stock Options converted on an exchange ratio adjusted based on actual trading prices of common stock of Progenics and Lantheus Holdings prior to the effective time of the merger.
The Amended Merger Agreement also provides that on closing our board of directors will appoint Dr. Gerard Ber and Mr. Heinz Mausli, who are currently members of the board of directors of Progenics, to serve on our board of directors. In addition, our board of directors, subject to complying with applicable fiduciary duties, will use commercially reasonable efforts to cause Dr. Ber and Mr. Mausli to be nominated for reelection following the closing through 2023. Our board of directors will be reduced in size from ten to nine members at our annual meeting of stockholders on April 23, 2020 (or sooner if the transaction closes before then) and will be further reduced in size from nine to eight members prior to the date of our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders.
Except as described above, the material terms of the Amended Merger Agreement are substantially the same as the terms of the Initial Merger Agreement.
The transaction is currently expected to close in the second quarter of 2020. Upon completion of the acquisition, which the parties intend to report as tax-deferred to Progenics’ stockholders with respect to the stock component of the merger consideration for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the combined company will continue to be headquartered in North Billerica, Massachusetts and will trade on the NASDAQ under the ticker symbol LNTH. See our Current Reports on Form 8-K dated October 1, 2019 and February 20, 2020 for further information regarding the Initial Merger Agreement, the Amended Merger Agreement and the proposed Progenics acquisition.
See Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for information regarding certain risks associated with our proposed acquisition of Progenics.
DEFINITY and the Expansion of Our Ultrasound Microbubble Franchise
DEFINITY is the leading ultrasound contrast imagingenhancing agent based on revenue and usage in the U.S., and is indicated for use in patients with suboptimal echocardiograms.echocardiograms to opacify the left ventricular chamber and to improve the delineation of the left ventricular endocardial border. Numerous patient conditions can decrease the quality of images of the left ventricle, the primary pumping chamber of the heart. The term DEFINITY includes its activated and non-activated forms.forms and the two formulations it is commercially available in; one that requires refrigerated storage and one that we have branded as DEFINITY RT that may be stored at room temperature.
DEFINITY is a clear, colorless, sterile liquid which,that, upon activation in a VialmixVIALMIX apparatus, a medical device specifically designed for DEFINITY, becomes a homogenous, opaque, milky white injectable suspension of perflutren-containing lipid microspheres. After activation and intravenous injection, DEFINITY opacifies the left ventricular chamber and improves the delineation of the left ventricular endocardial border, or innermost layer of tissue that lines the chamber of the left ventricle. Better visualization of the left ventricle allows clinicians to make more informed decisions about disease status.
DEFINITY offers flexible dosing and administration through an IV bolus or diluted bolus injection or continuous IV infusion. We
Based on estimates from third party sources, we believe DEFINITY’s synthetic lipid-cased coating gives the agent a distinct competitive advantage, because it provides a strong ultrasound signal and is the only perflutren-based echo contrast agent made without albumin.
Therethere were approximately 35.128 to 34 million echocardiograms performed in the U.S. in 2019 according to a third party source.2021 (the latest time period for which full year data is available and which also included the estimated impacts of COVID-19 and staffing challenges on procedure volumes). Assuming that between 20% and 30% of echocardiograms produce suboptimal images, as stated in the clinical literature, we estimate that approximately 7.06 to 10 million echocardiograms in 20192021 produced suboptimal images. The use of DEFINITY during echocardiography allows physicians to significantly improve their assessment of the function of the left ventricle.
Since its launch in 2001, DEFINITY has been used in imaging procedures in more than 13.821 million studies throughout the world. We estimate that, as of December 31, 2022, DEFINITY had over 80% share of the U.S. segment for contrastultrasound enhancing agents in echocardiography procedures as of December 2019.procedures. DEFINITY currently competes with Optison, aultrasound enhancing agents produced by GE Healthcare product, Lumason, aand Bracco product (known as SonoVue outside the U.S.Diagnostics Inc. (“Bracco”), as well as echocardiography without contrastthe use of ultrasound enhancing agents and non-echocardiography imaging modalities. DEFINITY Optison and Lumasonthe agents produced by GE Healthcare and Bracco all carry an FDA-required boxed warning, which has been modified over time, to notify physicians and patients about potentially serious safety concerns or risks posed by the products. See Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors-Ultrasound contrastenhancing agents may cause side effects which could limit our ability to sell DEFINITY.”
As we continue to pursue expanding our microbubble franchise, our activities include:
Patents - We continue to actively pursue additional patents in connection with DEFINITY and DEFINITY RT, both in the U.S. and internationally. In the U.S., for DEFINITY, we have ansix Orange Book-listed method of use patent expiringpatents, one of which expires in March2035 and five of which expire in 2037, andas well as additional manufacturing patents that are not Orange Book-listed expiring in 2021, 2023 and 2037. In the U.S. for DEFINITY RT, we have eight Orange Book-listed patents, including two composition of matter patents which expire in 2035. Outside of the U.S., while our DEFINITY patent protection and regulatory exclusivity have generally expired, we are currently prosecutingpursuing additional patent applications to tryDEFINITY and DEFINITY RT patents to obtain similar method of use and manufacturing patent protection as granted in the U.S.
The Orange Book-listed patents include a patent on the use of VIALMIX RFID (see below) which expires in 2037; we have submitted additional VIALMIX RFID patent applications in major markets throughout the world.Hatch-Waxman Act - Even though our longest duration Orange Book-listed DEFINITY patent extends until March 2037, because our Orange Book-listed composition of matter patent expired in June 2019, we may face generic DEFINITY challengerschallenges in the near to intermediate term. UnderSee “Intellectual Property – Patents” below.
As noted above, DEFINITY is activated through the Hatch-Waxman Act,use of medical devices branded as VIALMIX and VIALMIX RFID. The activation rate and time are controlled by VIALMIX RFID through the FDA can approve Abbreviated New Drug Applicationsuse of radio-frequency identification technology (“ANDAs”RFID”) for generic versionsto ensure reproducible activation of drugs ifDEFINITY. The RFID tag, which is affixed to the ANDA applicant demonstrates, among other things, that (i) its generic candidate isvial label, enables the same asDEFINITY vial to be appropriately activated with the innovator product by establishing bioequivalence and providing relevant chemistry, manufacturing and product data, and (ii) the marketing of that generic candidate does not infringe an Orange Book-listed patent. VIALMIX RFID activation device.
With respect to any Orange Book-listed patent coveringmanufacturing the innovator product, the ANDA applicant must give a notice to the innovator (a “Notice”)formulation of DEFINITY that the ANDA applicant certifies that its generic candidate will not infringe the innovator’s Orange Book-listed patent or that the Orange Book-listed patent is invalid. The innovator can then challenge the ANDA applicant in court within 45 days of receiving that Notice, and FDA approval to commercialize the generic candidate will be stayed (that is, delayed) for up to 30 months (measured from the date on which a Notice is received) while the patent dispute between the innovator and the ANDA applicant is resolved in court. The 30 month stay could potentially expire sooner if the courts determine that no infringement had occurred or that the challenged Orange Book-listed patent is invalid or if the parties otherwise settle their dispute.
As of the date of filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K,requires refrigeration, historically, we have not received any Notice from an ANDA applicant. If we were to (i) receive any such Notice in the future, (ii) bringrelied on Jubilant HollisterStier (“JHS”) as a patent infringement suit against the ANDA applicant within 45 dayssignificant supplier of receiving that Notice, and (iii) successfully obtain the full 30 month stay, then the ANDA applicant would be precluded from commercializing a generic version of DEFINITY prior to the expiration of that 30 month stay period and, potentially, thereafter, depending on how the patent dispute is resolved. Solely by way of example and not based on any knowledge we currently have, if we received a Notice from an ANDA applicant in March 2020 and the full 30 month stay was obtained, then the ANDA applicant would be precluded from commercialization until at least September 2022. If we received a Notice some number of months in the future and the full 30 month stay was obtained, the commercialization date would roll forward in the future by the same calculation.
Modified Formulation - We are developing at SBL a modifiedthis formulation of DEFINITY. We believe this modified formulation will provide an enhanced product profile enabling storage as well as shipment at room temperature (DEFINITY’s current formulation requires refrigerated storage), will give clinicians additional choice, and will allow for greater utility of this formulation in broader clinical settings. We haveconstructed a composition of matter patent on the modified formulation which runs through December 2035. If the modified formulation is approved by the FDA, then this patent would be eligible to be listed in the Orange Book. We currently believe that, if approved by the FDA, the modified formulation could become commercially available in early 2021, although that timing cannot be assured. Given its physical characteristics, the modified formulation may also be better suited for inclusion in kits requiring microbubbles for other indications and applications (including in kits developed by third parties of the type described in the next paragraph).
New Clinical Applications - As we continue to look for other opportunities to expand our microbubble franchise, we are evaluating new indications and clinical applications beyond echocardiography and contrast imaging generally. For example, we recently announced a strategic development and commercial collaboration with Cerevast Medical, Inc. (“Cerevast”) in which our microbubble will be used in connection with Cerevast’s ocular ultrasound device to target improving blood flow in occluded retinal veins in the eye. Retinal vein occlusion is one of the most common causes of vision loss worldwide. We also recently announced a strategic commercial supply agreement with CarThera for the use of our microbubbles in combination with SonoCloud, a proprietary implantable device in development for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. Glioblastoma is a lethal and devasting from of brain cancer with median survival of 15 months after diagnosis.
In-House Manufacturing - We are currently building specialized in-house manufacturing capabilitiesfacility at our North Billerica Massachusetts facilitycampus for purposes of producing this formulation of DEFINITY and, potentially, other sterile vial products. On February 22, 2022, we received FDA approval of our supplemental new drug application (“sNDA”), authorizing commercial manufacturing of this formulation of DEFINITY at our new facility. We believe thethis investment in these efforts will allowallows us to better controlmanage DEFINITY manufacturing for this formulation and inventory, reduce our costs in a potentially more price competitive environment, and provide us with supply chain redundancy. We currently expect to be in a position to use this in-house manufacturing capability by early 2021, although that timing cannot be assured.
As part of our microbubble franchise strategy, we also conducted two Phase 3, open-label, multicenter studies to evaluate left ventricular ejection fraction (“LVEF”) measurement accuracy and reproducibility of DEFINITYcontrast-enhanced and unenhanced echocardiography as compared to non-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (“CMRI”) used as the truth standard. The first of the two trials, BENEFIT 1, enrolled 145 subjects. After reviewing the study results from BENEFIT 1, we concluded there was no statistically significant improvement in the accuracy of LVEF values for contrast-enhanced echocardiography versus unenhanced echocardiography as compared to CMRI. In addition, analyses of the secondary endpoints revealed no improvement in inter-reader variability between the contrast-enhanced and unenhanced echocardiograms for LVEF assessments. A post-hoc analysis, however, did show statistically significant improvements in left ventricular diastolic, systolic and stroke volume measurements with contrast-enhanced versus unenhanced echocardiography when compared to CMRI. We will continue to analyze the BENEFIT 1 data, and when the data from BENEFIT 2 are available, we will compile the data sets to analyze the full results of the trials.
See Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for information regarding certain risks associated with DEFINITY and see Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-ComparisonOperations - Comparison of the Periods Ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018-Revenues”2021 - Revenues” for further information on total revenue contributed by DEFINITY in each of our last three fiscal years.DEFINITY.
TechneLite
TechneLite is a self-contained system or generator of Technetium (“Tc-99m”),Tc-99m, a radioactive isotope with a six hour half-life, used by radiopharmacies to prepare various nuclear imaging agents. Tc-99m results from the radioactive decay of Mo-99, itself a radioisotope with a 66-hour half-life producedsourced in our supply chain in nuclear research reactors around the worldlocated in Belgium, South Africa and Australia from enriched uranium. The TechneLite generator is a littleslightly larger than a coffee can in size, and the self-contained system houses a vertical glass column at its core that contains Mo-99.Mo-99, which degrades to Tc-99m. During our manufacturing process, Mo-99 is added to the column within the generator where it is adsorbed onto alumina powder. The column is sterilized, enclosed in a lead shield and further sealed in a cylindrical plastic container, which is then immediately shipped to our radiopharmacy customers. Because of the short half-lives of Mo-99 and Tc-99m, radiopharmacies typically purchase TechneLite generators on a weekly basis pursuant to standing orders.
The Tc-99m produced by our TechneLite generator is the medical radioisotope that can be attached to a number of imaging agents, including our own CardioliteNEUROLITE and CARDIOLITE products, and Neurolite, during the radiolabeling process. To radiolabel a Tc-99m-based radiopharmaceutical, a vial of sterile saline and a vacuum vial are each affixed to the top of a TechneLite generator. The sterile saline is pulled through the generator where it attracts Tc-99m resulting from the radioactive decay of Mo-99 within the generator column. The Tc-99m-containing radioactive saline is then pulled into thea vacuum vial and subsequently combined by a radiopharmacist with the applicable imaging agent, andwhich allows the preparation of individual patient-specific radiolabeled imaging agent doses are then prepared.doses. When administered, the imaging agent binds to specific tissues or organs for a period of time, enabling the Tc-99m to illuminate the functional health of the imaged tissues or organs in a diagnostic image. Our ability to produce and market TechneLite is highly dependent on our supply of Mo-99. See “Raw Materials and Supply Relationships—Molybdenum-99” below.
TechneLite is produced in 13 sizes (based on amount of radioactivity) and is currently marketed primarily in Norththe U.S., Canada, Central America and LatinSouth America, largely to radiopharmacies that prepare unit doses of radiopharmaceutical imaging agents and ship these preparations directly to hospitals for administration to patients. In the U.S., we have supply contracts with the significantlarge radiopharmacy groups, including Cardinal Health (“Cardinal”), RLS (USA) Inc. (previously GE Healthcare, Cardinal, UPPI, Jubilant RadiopharmaHealthcare) (“RLS”), United Pharmacy Partners (“UPPI”) and PharmaLogic.PharmaLogic Holdings Corp (“PharmaLogic”). We also supply generators on a purchase order basis to other customers. We estimate that TechneLite had approximately one third of the U.S. generator market as of December 31, 2019,2022, competing primarily with Tc-99m-based generators produced by Curium. In Puerto Rico,Curium and NorthStar Medical Radioisotopes, LLC (“Northstar”). Outside of the U.S., we alsosell generators through supply TechneLiteagreements with radiopharmacy chains, through distributors or to our wholly-owned radiopharmacy to prepare radiopharmaceutical imaging agent unit doses.
In Canada, we have a supply agreement (the “Isologic Supply Agreement”) with Isologic Innovative Radiopharmaceuticals Ltd. (“Isologic”). Under the Isologic Supply Agreement, we supply Isologic with certain of our products on commercial terms, including certain product purchase commitments by Isologic. The agreement expires in January 2021 and may be terminated upon the occurrence of specified events, including a material breach by the other party, bankruptcy by either party or certain force majeure events. In Australia, we have a supply agreement (the “GMS Supply Agreement”) with Global Medical Solutions (“GMS”). Under the GMS Supply Agreement, we supply GMS with certain of our products on commercial terms, including certain minimum product purchase commitments by GMS. The agreement expires in August 2020 and may be terminated in whole or in part on a product-by-product basis upon the occurrence of specified events, including a material breach by the other party, bankruptcy by either party or certain force majeure events.separate customers.
The Mo-99 used in our TechneLite generators can be produced using targets made of either highly-enriched uranium (“HEU”) or low-enriched uranium (“LEU”). LEU consists of uranium that contains less than 20% of the uranium-235 isotope. HEU is often considered weapons grade material, with 20% or more of uranium-235. The American Medical Isotopes Production Act of 2012 encourages the domestic production of LEU Mo-99 and provides for the eventual prohibition of the export of HEU from the U.S. Although Medicare generally does not provide separate payment to hospitals for the use of diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals administered in an outpatient setting, since 2013, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”), the federal agency responsible for administering the Medicare program, has provided an add-on payment (of $10)of $10 under the hospital outpatient prospective payment system for every Tc-99m diagnostic dose produced from non-HEU sourced Mo-99, to cover the marginal cost for radioisotopes produced from non-HEU sources. Our LEU TechneLite generator satisfies the reimbursement requirements under the applicable CMS rules.
TechneLite has patent protection in the U.S. and various foreign countries on certain component technology currently expiring in 2029. In addition, given the significant know-how and trade secrets associated with the methods of manufacturing and assembling the TechneLite generator, we believe we have a substantial amount of valuable and defensible proprietary intellectual property associated with the product. We believe that our substantial capital investments in our highly automated TechneLite production line and our extensive experience in complying with the stringent regulatory requirements for the handling of nuclear materials, create significant and sustainable competitive advantages for us in generator manufacturing and distribution. Given our significant know-how and trade secrets associated with the methods of manufacturing and assembling the TechneLite generator, we believe we have a substantial amount of valuable and defensible proprietary intellectual property associated with the product. In addition, TechneLite has patent protection in the U.S. and various foreign countries on certain component technology currently until 2029, and we are pursuing additional patent protection in the U.S. and world-wide on other component technology that, if granted, would expire in 2040.
See Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-ComparisonOperations - Comparison of the Periods Ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018-Revenues”2021 - Revenues” for further information on revenue contributed by TechneLite.
Radiopharmaceutical Oncology
Continued Growth of PYLARIFY
PYLARIFY is a radioactive diagnostic agent indicated for PET imaging of PSMA-positive lesions in men with prostate cancer with suspected metastasis who are candidates for initial definitive therapy and in men with suspected recurrence based on elevated PSA levels. PYLARIFY works by binding to PSMA, a protein that is overexpressed on the surface of more than 90% of primary and metastatic prostate cancer cells. PYLARIFY works with PET/CT technology to produce a combined PET/CT scan that enables the reader of the PET/CT scan to detect and locate the disease.
According to the American Cancer Society, prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in American men - one in eight American men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer in their lifetimes and over 3.2 million American men are living with prostate cancer today. Based on estimates from third party sources regarding the incidence of prostate cancer in men in the U.S., we believe the market potential for PSMA PET imaging agents in the U.S. could be up to 350,000 annual scans, comprised of 125,000 scans for patients with intermediate, unfavorable or high/very high risk of suspected metastases of prostate cancer, 195,000 scans for patients with suspected recurrence of prostate cancer, and 30,000 scans for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (“mCRPC”) who may be under consideration for PSMA-targeted therapy for the treatment of adult patients with PSMA-positive mCRPC who have already been treated with other anticancer treatments (androgen receptor pathway inhibition and taxane-based chemotherapy).
In March 2022, we announced a strategic collaboration with Novartis to include PYLARIFY in prostate cancer trials with PLUVICTO, Novartis’ PSMA-targeted therapeutic. In addition, in 2022, we entered into an agreement with Curium to add PYLARIFY to its PSMA-targeted therapeutic clinical trial referred to by Curium as ECLIPSE. Both of these collaborations, as well as other collaborations using PYLARIFY, are described further under Strategic Partnerships and Other Revenue – Oncology below.
Also, during 2022, the National Comprehensive Cancer Center updated its guidelines and the Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging updated its appropriate use criteria, both noting that PSMA PET imaging agents, including PYLARIFY, can be used for patient selection for PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy.
The commercial launch of PYLARIFY was complex and, we believe, highly successful. To manufacture PYLARIFY, we assembled and qualified a nationwide network of PMFs with cyclotrons that produce F 18. After being made on a cyclotron at a PMF, the F 18 is then combined with certain chemical ingredients in specially designed chemistry synthesis boxes to manufacture PYLARIFY. The finished PYLARIFY is then quality control tested and transferred to a radiopharmacist who prepares and dispenses patient-specific doses of the final product. Because each of the PMFs manufacturing these products is deemed by the FDA to be a separate manufacturing site, each had to be separately approved by the FDA. As of December 31, 2022, we had activated 37 PMF manufacturing sites in our PMF network, up from 21 activated sites as of December 31, 2021. These additional sites provide geographic breadth, out-the-door time flexibility and added optionality within our existing PMF network. Overall, we have achieved broad national distribution of PYLARIFY with customers in 46 of 50 states, including the District of Columbia.
In addition to our network of PMFs, we have also been working with academic medical centers in the U.S. that have radioisotope-producing cyclotrons who have expressed an interest in manufacturing PYLARIFY. For this initiative, we enter into a fee-for-service arrangement under which the academic medical center manufactures F 18 on its cyclotron and completes the manufacturing process for PYLARIFY. PYLARIFY can then be used by the academic medical center itself, and in some cases distributed to other customers under separate purchase agreements.
Our commercial launch also required obtaining adequate coding, coverage and payment for PYLARIFY, including not only coverage from Medicare, Medicaid and other government payors, as well as private payors, but also appropriate payment levels to adequately cover our customers’ costs of using PYLARIFY in PSMA PET/CT imaging procedures. The Healthcare Procedure Coding System (“HCPCS”) code, which enables streamlined billing went into effect as of January 1, 2022. In addition, effective January 1, 2022, CMS granted Transitional Pass-Through Payment Status (“TPT Status”) under the Hospital Outpatient Prospect Payment System (“OPPS”) for PYLARIFY, enabling CMS to provide separate payment for PET/CT scans performed with PYLARIFY. Note that TPT only applies to traditional fee-for-service Medicare in the hospital outpatient setting. TPT Status for PYLARIFY is expected to expire December 31, 2024. After TPT Status expires, under current Medicare rules, PYLARIFY, similar to other diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals, would not be separately reimbursed in the hospital outpatient setting, but rather would be bundled into the facility payment a hospital receives for a PET/CT imaging procedure, and the facility payment may not always adequately cover the total cost of the procedure.
Our successful growth of PYLARIFY will depend on our ability to maintain PYLARIFY as the leading PSMA PET imaging agent in a competitive environment in which other PSMA PET imaging agents have been approved and additional ones are in development. PYLARIFY’s current competition is primarily two commercially available Gallium-68 (“Ga-68”)-based PSMA imaging agents, as well as other non-PSMA-based imaging agents. We may also face competition from an F 18 PSMA PET imaging agent currently under review by the FDA.
We actively pursue patents in connection with PYLARIFY, both in the U.S. and internationally. In the U.S. for PYLARIFY, we have four Orange Book-listed patents, including composition of matter patents, the last of which expires in 2037. Outside of the U.S., we have, and are currently pursuing, additional PYLARIFY patents to obtain similar patent protection as in the U.S.
See Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for information regarding certain risks associated with PYLARIFY and Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Comparison of the Periods Ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 - Revenues” for further information on total revenue contributed by TechneLite in eachPYLARIFY since its approval.
Strategic Partnerships and Other Revenue
We continue to seek ways to further increase the overall value of our last three fiscal years.
Other Commercial Products
In addition to the products listed above, our portfolio of commercial products also includes important imaging agents in specific segments, which provide a stable base of recurring revenue. Most of these products have a favorable industry position as a result of our substantial infrastructure investment, specialized workforce, technical know-how and supplier and customer relationships.
Xenon Xe 133 Gas (“Xenon”) is a radiopharmaceutical gas that is inhaled and used to assess pulmonary function and also to image cerebral blood flow. Our Xenon is manufactured by a third party as a bi-product of Mo-99 production and is processed and finished by us.product candidates. We are evaluating a number of different opportunities to collaborate, in-license or acquire additional products, product candidates, businesses and technologies to drive our future growth. In particular, we are focused on late-stage diagnostic and therapeutic product opportunities in oncology and other strategic areas that complement our existing portfolio. Our Pharma Services business focuses on advancing innovative imaging biomarker solutions through collaborations with pharmaceutical companies and academic centers. Our Digital Solutions business focuses on developing and commercializing 510(k) cleared and CE marked digital applications to enhance the performance of imaging agents; our Digital Solutions portfolio currently the leading provider of Xenon in the U.S.
includes aBSI, aPROMISE and PYLARIFY AI.Neurolite is an injectable, Tc-99m-labeled imaging agent used with SPECT technology to identify the area within the brain where blood flow has been blocked or reduced due to stroke. We launched Neurolite in 1995.
Cardiolite, also known by its generic name sestamibi, is an injectable, Tc-99m-labeled imaging agent used in MPI procedures to assess blood flow to the muscle of the heart using SPECT. Cardiolite was approved by the FDA in 1990 and its market exclusivity expired in July 2008. Included in Cardiolite revenues are branded Cardiolite and generic sestamibi revenues.
Thallium TI 201 is an injectable radiopharmaceutical imaging agent used in MPI studies to detect cardiovascular disease. We have marketed Thallium since 1977 and manufacture the agent using cyclotron technology.
FDG is an injectable, fluorine-18-radiolabeled imaging agent used with PET technology to identify and characterize tumors in patients undergoing oncologic diagnostic procedures. We manufacture and distribute FDG from our Puerto Rico radiopharmacy.
Oncology
As we continue to pursue expanding strategic partnerships, our Pharma Services activities in oncology include:
Gallium (Ga 67) •Prostate Cancer – We collaborate with pharmaceutical companies developing therapies and diagnostics in prostate cancer.
▪In June 2022, Curium (our licensee that is developing and commercializing piflufolastat F 18 in Europe) announced that it had submitted its marketing authorization application to the European Medicines Agency seeking approval for piflufolastat F 18. In addition, in 2022, we entered into an agreement with Curium to add PYLARIFY to its U.S. ECLIPSE trial, a multi-center, open-label, randomized Phase 3 trial comparing the safety and efficacy of Curium’s PSMA-targeted therapeutic versus hormone therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. PYLARIFY will be used to determine PSMA-avidity as part of patient selection.
▪In March 2022, we announced a collaboration with Novartis to include PYLARIFY in prostate cancer trials with PLUVICTO. As part of the agreement with Novartis, we will provide PYLARIFY for the selection of patients with prostate cancer for the trials, and Novartis will provide all PYLARIFY-related clinical imaging data to us.
▪In January 2022, we announced a collaboration with the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trial Consortium (“PCCTC”), a premier multicenter clinical research organization that specializes in prostate cancer research. The intent of the strategic collaboration is to integrate our AI platform into PCCTC studies to advance the development and validation of novel AI-enabled biomarkers.
•Prior to 2022, we also entered into several other separate agreements, including with RefleXion Medical, Inc., POINT and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., under which we supply PYLARIFY in connection with their clinical studies.
◦In May 2019, we commenced an initiative to build out our Pharma Services capabilities, which reside in our Strategic Partnerships and Other Revenue product category. We have undertaken the following efforts to execute that initiative.
◦Immuno-Oncology - We entered into a strategic collaboration and license agreement with NanoMab Technology Limited (“NanoMab”), a privately-held biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of next generation radiopharmaceuticals for cancer precision medicine. In May 2022, we announced that the first patient had been dosed in a Phase 2 clinical trial of NM-01, a novel technetium-99m SPECT imaging agent under development to assess PD-L1 expression in cancer cells. The Phase 2 clinical trial is an injectable radiopharmaceutical imaging agent usedopen-label, single-arm trial in non-small cell lung cancer patients. The primary endpoint is the assessment of PD-L1 expression in primary tumor and metastatic lesions by NM-01 compared to detect certain infectionsimmunohistochemistry. Other objectives are aimed at quantifying intra- and cancerous tumors, especially lymphoma. We manufacture Gallium using cyclotron technology.
Quadramet, currently our only therapeutic product, is an injectable radiopharmaceutical used to treat severe bone pain associated with osteoblastic metastatic bone lesions. We serve as the direct manufacturer and supplierinter-tumoral heterogeneity of Quadramet in the U.S.
Cobalt (Co 57) is a non-pharmaceutical radiochemical used in the manufacture of sources for the calibration and maintenance of SPECT imaging cameras.
Distribution, Marketing and Sales
The following table sets forth certain key market information for each of our commercial pharmaceutical products:
|
| |
Product | Approved Markets |
DEFINITY | Australia, Canada, European Union, European Economic Area, India, Israel, Mexico, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, United States |
TechneLite | Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, New Zealand, Panama, South Korea, Taiwan, United States |
Xenon | Canada, United States |
Cardiolite | Australia, Canada, Costa Rica, Hong Kong, Israel, Japan, New Zealand, Panama, Philippines, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, United States |
Neurolite | Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Costa Rica, Denmark, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, New Zealand, Philippines, Slovenia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, United States |
Thallium Tl 201 | Australia, Canada, Colombia, New Zealand, Pakistan, Panama, South Korea, Taiwan, United States |
Gallium Ga 67 | Australia, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, New Zealand, Pakistan, Panama, South Korea, Taiwan, United States |
FDG | United States |
Quadramet | United States |
In the U.S. and Canada, we have a sales team of approximately 80 employees that call on healthcare providers in the echocardiography space,PD-L1 expression by NM-01, as well as radiopharmacy chains, integrated delivery networksestablishing correlations with other diagnostic procedures. The trial is being conducted by NanoMab at King’s College London and group purchasing organizations.is expected to complete enrollment in 2023.
Our radiopharmaceutical products are sold◦Pan-Oncology - In March 2021, we acquired from Ratio Therapeutics LLC (“Ratio”) (previously Noria Therapeutics, Inc.) exclusive, worldwide rights to NTI-1309, an innovative imaging biomarker that targets fibroblast activation protein, an emerging target with broad potential imaging applicability and use in oncology. Upon further clinical development, we will assess options to bring NTI-1309 to market as a diagnostic or potentially a therapeutic agent.
Microbubble Franchise
In addition, we continue to seek to optimize our microbubble platform through new collaborations. In December 2022, we announced a strategic collaboration with SonoThera, Inc. (“SonoThera”), who will use our microbubbles in combination with their ultrasound-guided, non-viral, gene therapy platform and treatments. Prior to 2022, we entered into microbubble collaborations with the following parties: (i) Cerevast Medical, Inc. (“Cerevast”), in which our microbubbles will be used in connection with Cerevast’s ocular ultrasound device to improve blood flow in occluded retinal veins in the U.S. through a subseteye; (ii) CarThera SAS (“CarThera”), for the use of our sales team, primarily to radiopharmacies. We sellmicrobubbles in combination with SonoCloud, a majority of our radiopharmaceutical productsproprietary implantable device in the U.S. to five radiopharmacy groups—namely GE Healthcare, Cardinal, UPPI, Jubilant Radiopharma and PharmaLogic. Our contractual distribution and other arrangements with these radiopharmacy groups are as follows:
GE Healthcare maintains approximately 31 radiopharmacies in the U.S. that purchase our TechneLite generators. We estimate that GE Healthcare distributed approximately 9% of the aggregate U.S. SPECT doses sold in the first half of 2019. We currently have an agreement with GE Healthcaredevelopment for the distributiontreatment of TechneLite, Xenon and other products. The agreement provides that GE Healthcarerecurrent glioblastoma; (iii) Insightec Ltd. (“Insightec”), which will purchase a minimum percentageuse our microbubbles in connection with the development of TechneLite generatorsInsightec’s transcranial guided focused ultrasound device for the treatment of glioblastoma as well as certain other products from us. Our agreement,neurodegenerative conditions; and (iv) Allegheny Health Network (“AHN”) which expires on December 31, 2020, may be terminated by either party upon the occurrence of specified events including a material breach by either party, bankruptcy by either party, certain irresolvable regulatory changes or economic circumstances, or force majeure events.
Cardinal maintains approximately 131 radiopharmacies that are typically locatedwill use our microbubbles in large, densely populated urban areas in the U.S. We estimate that Cardinal’s radiopharmacies distributed approximately 44% of the aggregate U.S. SPECT doses sold in the first half of 2019 (the latest information currently available to us). Our written supply agreementcombination with Cardinal relating to TechneLite, Xenon, Neurolite and other products expires on December 31, 2020. The agreement specifies pricing levels and requirements to purchase minimum percentages of certain products during certain periods. The agreement may be terminated upon the occurrence of specified events, including a material breach by the other party and certain force majeure events.
UPPI is a cooperative purchasing group (roughly analogous to a group purchasing organization) of approximately 60 independently owned or smaller chain radiopharmacies located in the U.S. UPPI’s radiopharmacies are typically broadly dispersed geographically, with some urban presence and a substantial number of radiopharmacies located in suburban and rural areas of the country. We estimate that these independent radiopharmacies, together with approximately 9 unaffiliated, independent radiopharmacies, distributed approximately 19% of the aggregate U.S. SPECT doses sold in the first half of 2019. We currently have an agreement with UPPIAHN’s ultrasound-assisted non-viral gene transfer technology for the distributiondevelopment of TechneLite, Xenon and certain other products to radiopharmacies or familiesa proposed treatment of radiopharmacies within the UPPI cooperative purchasing group. The agreement contains specified pricing levels based upon specified purchase amounts for UPPI. We are entitled to terminate the UPPI agreement upon 60 days written notice. The UPPI agreement expires on December 31, 2020.
Jubilant Radiopharma maintains approximately 56 radiopharmacies in the U.S. that purchase a range of our products. We estimate that Jubilant Radiopharma distributed approximately 14% of the aggregate U.S. SPECT doses sold in the first half of 2019. We currently have an agreement with Jubilant Radiopharma for the distribution of TechneLite, Xenon, Neurolite and other products. The agreement specifies pricing levels and volume and percentage purchase requirements. The agreement will expire on December 31, 2020 and may be terminated upon the occurrence of specified events, including a material breach by the other party.
PharmaLogic maintains approximately 23 radiopharmacies in the U.S. that purchase a range of our products. We estimate that PharmaLogic distributed approximately 4% of the aggregate U.S. SPECT doses sold in the first half of 2019. Our written supply agreement with PharmaLogic relating to TechneLite, Xenon, Cardiolite and other products expires on December 31, 2020. The agreement specifies pricing levels and requirements to purchase minimum percentages of certain products during certain periods. The agreement may be terminated upon the occurrence of specified events, including a material breach by the other party and certain force majeure events.
In addition to the distribution arrangements for our radiopharmaceutical products described above, we also sell certain of our radiopharmaceutical products to independent radiopharmacies and directly to hospitals and clinics that maintain in-house radiopharmaceutical capabilities and operations. In the latter case, this represents a small percentage of overall sales because the majority of hospitals and clinics do not maintain these in-house capabilities.
In Puerto Rico, we own and operate one of the two radiopharmacies on the island, where we sell our own products as well as products of third parties to end-users. In Canada, we operate some direct distribution activities.
In Europe, Canada, Australia, Asia-Pacific and Latin America, we utilize third party distributor relationships to market, sell and distribute our products, either on a country-by-country basis or on a multi-country regional basis.xerostomia.
In March 2012, we entered into a development and distribution arrangement with China Resources Double-Crane (“Double-Crane”) for DEFINITY in China, Hong Kong and Macau with Double-Crane Pharmaceutical Company (“Double-Crane”). With Double-Crane’s support, we are currently pursuing the Chinese regulatory approval required to commercialize DEFINITY. In July 2013, we submitted a clinical trial application to the Chinese Food and Drug Administration (“CFDA”) seeking an Import Drug License. After a very extensive waiting period caused by a large number of drugs seeking CFDA regulatory approval, in February 2016, the CFDA approved our clinical trial application.Macau. Double-Crane has conducted on our behalf three confirmatory clinical trials in pursuit of cardiac, liver and kidney imaging indications, as well as one small pharmacokinetic study. Double Crane is preparing an application toIn November 2022, we announced the CFDA for anapproval of our Import Drug License application with the National Medical Products Administration (“NMPA”) for the cardiac indication. Double Craneuse of DEFINITY in patients with suboptimal conventional echocardiography and to better identify the left ventricular endocardial border. Double-Crane is responsible for obtaining adequate coding, coverage and payment and commercializing DEFINITY in China under a local brand name. Double-Crane is also in the process of analyzing the clinical results relating to the liver and kidney indications and will also work with us to prepare a CFDAan Import Drug License application for those indications, as appropriate.
RELISTOR
•Bausch Agreement -- Under its agreement with Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bausch, Progenics received a $40.0 million development milestone upon U.S. marketing approval for subcutaneous RELISTOR in non-cancer pain patients in 2014, a $50.0 million development milestone for the U.S. marketing approval of an oral formulation of RELISTOR in July 2016, and a $10.0 million sales milestone for RELISTOR achieving U.S. net sales in excess of $100.0 million in 2019. We are also eligible to receive additional one-time sales milestone payments upon achievement of specified U.S. net sales targets, including:
| | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Net Sales Levels in any Single Calendar Year | | Payment ($) |
| | (In thousands) |
| In excess of $150 million | | 15,000 |
| In excess of $200 million | | 20,000 |
| In excess of $300 million | | 30,000 |
| In excess of $750 million | | 50,000 |
| In excess of $1 billion | | 75,000 |
Each sales milestone payment is payable one time only, regardless of the number of times the condition is satisfied, and all five remaining payments could be made within the same calendar year. We are also eligible to receive royalties from Bausch and its affiliates based on the following royalty scale: 15% on worldwide net sales up to $100.0 million, 17% on the next $400.0 million in worldwide net sales, and 19% on worldwide net sales over $500.0 million each calendar year, and 60% of any upfront, milestone, reimbursement or other revenue (net of costs of goods sold, as defined, and territory-specific research and development expense reimbursement) Bausch receives from sublicensees outside the U.S.
aBSI
•aBSI automatically calculates the disease burden of prostate cancer by detecting and classifying bone scan tracer uptakes as metastatic or benign lesions using an artificial neural network. The cloud based aBSI was made available for clinical use in the U.S. on August 5, 2019. In February 2020, Progenics received CE marking for the standalone workstation model of aBSI, meeting the quality standards set by the European Economic Area. In September 2020, the FDA granted 510(k) clearance for the use of aBSI as software-as-a-medical device on a GE Healthcare imaging system. aBSI is also approved in Japan and part of the JSMO guidelines (Japanese Society of Medical Oncology) in support of clinicians with patient treatment selection. The Japanese non-exclusive rights to aBSI have been transferred and sold to FUJIFILM Toyama Chemical Co. Ltd. (“FUJIFILM”) under the name BONENAVI®.
PYLARIFY AI
•PYLARIFY AI is artificial intelligence medical device software that is designed to allow healthcare professionals and researchers to perform standardized quantitative assessment of PSMA PET/CT images in prostate cancer, including those images obtained by using PYLARIFY. PYLARIFY AI has demonstrated improved consistency, accuracy and efficiency in quantitative assessment of PSMA PET/CT. The technology analyzes the PET/CT image to segment anatomical regions, including 51 bones and 12 soft tissue organs. This image segmentation enables automated localization, detection and quantification of potential PSMA-avid lesions in the PET/CT image, which is incorporated into a standardized report for physicians. PYLARIFY AI can be deployed either as a secure web cloud application or within the secure firewall of the institution on a local server. Once deployed, the adaptive application can be integrated into an institution’s existing clinical workflow, delivering a unique combination of clinical utility and technical flexibility. We believe that PYLARIFY AI when used with PYLARIFY will provide us an important competitive advantage in what we expect will be a highly competitive PET PSMA diagnostic imaging agent market, although we can give no assurances to that effect. Our subsidiary, EXINI, was granted 510(k) clearance by the FDA in the U.S. and received a CE marking in Europe for aPROMISE. We commercially launched aPROMISE under the name PYLARIFY AI in the U.S. in November 2021 and the FDA granted us an additional 510(k) clearance during the second quarter of 2022.
[18F] flurpiridaz
•GE Healthcare Agreement – In April 2017, we announced entering into a definitive, exclusive Collaboration and License Agreement with GE Healthcare for the continued Phase 3 development and worldwide commercialization of flurpiridaz, a fluorine 18-based PET MPI agent designed to assess blood flow to the heart in patients suspected of coronary artery disease (“CAD”). Under our agreement, GE Healthcare will complete the development of flurpiridaz, pursue worldwide regulatory
approvals, and, if successful, lead a worldwide launch and commercialization of the agent, with us collaborating on both development and commercialization through a joint steering committee. We also have retained the right to co-promote the agent in the U.S. GE Healthcare’s development plan initially focuses on obtaining regulatory approval in the U.S., Japan, Europe and Canada. Under the agreement, we received an upfront cash payment of $5.0 million and are eligible to receive up to $60.0 million in regulatory and sales milestone payments, tiered double-digit royalties on U.S. sales, and mid-single digit royalties on sales outside of the U.S. In September 2022, we announced with GE Healthcare that the second Phase 3 clinical trial had met its co-primary endpoints of exceeding a 60% threshold for both sensitivity and specificity for detecting CAD. The findings, shared at an American Society of Nuclear Cardiology conference, also indicated that cardiac PET imaging with flurpiridaz demonstrated higher diagnostic efficacy and image quality in patients with suspected CAD, compared with SPECT MPI, the predominant procedure currently used in nuclear cardiology. Assuming regulatory approval, we anticipate commercialization beginning in 2024.
See Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for information regarding certain risks associated with our strategic activities.
Our Clinical Development Candidates
In addition to our commercial products and strategic partnerships with third parties, we also have ongoing clinical development programs, including, among others, the following:
•PNT2002 is a prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy for the treatment of mCRPC. PNT2002 is currently in its Phase 3 study, designed to evaluate superiority to the standard of care in mCRPC pre-chemotherapy patients who have failed one androgen receptor pathway inhibitor.
•PNT2003 is an SSTR therapy with non-carrier added lutetium-177, which is in development to treat patients with SSTR-positive neuroendocrine tumors. PNT2003 is currently in a Phase 3 trial.
•1095 (also known as 131 I-MIP-1095) is a PSMA-targeted iodine-131-labeled small molecule that is designed to deliver a dose of beta radiation directly to prostate cancer cells with minimal impact on the surrounding healthy tissues. We enrolled the last patient in our ARROW Phase 2 study during the second quarter of 2022. In total, 120 patients have been randomized -- 80 in the 1095 plus enzalutamide combination group and 40 in the enzalutamide alone group. This study is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled Phase 2 clinical study evaluating the efficacy and safety of 1095, our PSMA-targeted I-131 therapeutic, in combination with enzalutamide compared to enzalutamide alone in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer who are PSMA-avid, chemotherapy naïve, and have progressed on abiraterone. The primary endpoint in this study is PSA response rate. Key secondary endpoints include time to radiographic free progression, progression free survival, and overall survival. Patients in this study will be followed for one year after their first treatment for all efficacy endpoints and survival and safety data will be collected for an additional year.
For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, we invested $311.7 million, $45.0 million and $32.8 million in research and development (“R&D”), respectively, primarily related to our clinical development candidates. For the year ended December 31, 2022, we recognized $260.0 million of R&D expense related to the upfront payments to POINT. In addition to our clinical development group, our R&D team also includes our Medical Affairs and Medical Information functions, which educate physicians on the scientific aspects of our commercial products and the approved indications.
See Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for information regarding certain risks associated with our strategic partnerships and clinical development programs.
Distribution, Marketing and Sales
The following table sets forth certain key market information for each of our commercial pharmaceutical products within each product category:
| | | | | |
| Product | Approved Markets |
| Precision Diagnostics | |
| DEFINITY (or LUMINITY) | Australia, Canada, China, European Union, European Economic Area, India, Israel, Mexico, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States |
| TechneLite | Australia, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, New Zealand, Panama, South Korea, Taiwan, United States |
| NEUROLITE | Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Costa Rica, Denmark, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, New Zealand, Philippines, Slovenia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, United States |
| Xenon | Canada, United States |
| CARDIOLITE | Australia, Canada, Costa Rica, Hong Kong, Israel, Japan, New Zealand, Panama, Philippines, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, United States |
| Radiopharmaceutical Oncology | |
| PYLARIFY | United States |
| AZEDRA | United States |
| Strategic Partnerships and Other Revenue | |
| RELISTOR (Solution for Injection 12 mg/0.6 mL vial) | Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Switzerland, Cypress, Czechia, Germany, Denmark, Estonia, Greece, Spain, Finland, France, Croatia, Hungary, Ireland, Iceland, Italy, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Latvia, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Sweden, Slovenia, Slovakia, United Kingdom, United States |
| RELISTOR (Solution for Injection in pre-filled syringe 8mg and pre-filled syringe 12 mg) | Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Cypress, Czechia, Germany, Denmark, Estonia, Greece, Spain, Finland, France, Croatia, Hungary, Ireland, Iceland, Italy, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Latvia, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Sweden, Slovenia, Slovakia, United Kingdom, United States |
| RELISTOR (methylnaltrexone bromide) Oral Tablet 140 mg | United States |
With respect to our medical devices:
•Progenics received CE marking for the standalone workstation model of aBSI, meeting the quality standards set by the European Economic Area. In September 2020, the FDA granted 510(k) clearance for the use of aBSI as software-as-a-medical device on a GE Healthcare imaging system.
•EXINI was granted 510(k) clearance by the FDA in the U.S. and received CE marking in Europe for aPROMISE. We launched aPROMISE under the name PYLARIFY AI in the U.S.
PYLARIFY sales are generated in the U.S. through a PYLARIFY direct sales team and a sales team at some of our PMF partners. Sales of DEFINITY are generated in the U.S. through a DEFINITY direct sales team. While a small portion of our nuclear imaging product sales in the U.S. are generated through our direct sales force to hospitals and clinics that maintain their own in-house radiopharmaceutical preparation capabilities, we primarily sell our nuclear imaging products, including TechneLite, NEUROLITE, Xenon, and CARDIOLITE, to large radiopharmacy groups. We have licensed RELISTOR to Bausch, and we collect quarterly royalties based on sales generated by Bausch. AZEDRA sales are generated in the U.S. through an AZEDRA direct sales team. PYLARIFY AI sales leads are generated in the U.S. through a direct sales team with sales generated through distributors and other strategic partners.
Seasonality
Our business hasWe have some modest seasonality for our products as patients may seek to schedule non-urgent diagnostic imaging and other procedures less frequently during the summer vacation months and over the year-end holidays.
Customers
No customer accounted for greater than 10% of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019.2022.
Backlog
Our backlog consists of orders for which a delivery schedule within the next twelve months has been specified. Orders included in backlog may be canceled or rescheduled by customers at any time with the exception of TechneLite orders. For TechneLite, customers must provide us with four weeks advanced notice to cancel an order. We do not believe that our backlog at any particular time is meaningful because it has historically been immaterial relative to our consolidated revenues and is not necessarily indicative of future revenues for any given period.
Competition
We believe that our key product characteristics, such as proven efficacy, reliability and safety, coupled with our core competencies, such as our efficient manufacturing processes, our established distribution network, our experienced field sales organization and our customer service focus, are important factors that distinguish us from our competitors.
The marketmarkets for diagnostic medical imaging agents isour products are highly competitive and continually evolving. Our principal competitors in existing diagnostic modalitiesfor our current commercial products and leading clinical development candidates include large, global companies that are more diversified than we are and that have substantial financial, manufacturing, sales and marketing, distribution and other resources. These
•For PYLARIFY, our principal competitors are currently Telix Pharmaceuticals Limited and Novartis AG. We also face potential competition from an F 18 PSMA PET imaging agent for which Bracco is currently seeking FDA approval, which we believe could be granted by the FDA in 2023.
•For DEFINITY, our competitors currently include GE Healthcare and Bracco.
•For a number of our SPECT radiopharmaceutical commercial products, our competitors currently include Curium, GE Healthcare, Bracco and Jubilant Life Sciences, an affiliate of JHS and Jubilant Radiopharma, as well as other competitors, including NorthStar Medical Radioisotopes. and potentially BWXT Medical.
•For RELISTOR, our principal competitors include RedHill Biopharma Inc., in collaboration with AstraZeneca PLC; Cubist Pharmaceuticals, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.; Mallinckrodt plc, in collaboration with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited; and BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc.; together with other prescription, as well as over-the-counter, laxatives used as first line therapy for OIC.
•For AZEDRA, while there are currently no other FDA approved anticancer treatments in the U.S. for malignant, recurrent, and/or unresectable pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma, our competitors include developers of anticancer treatments currently used, but not specifically FDA approved for treatment of malignant, recurrent, and/or unresectable pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.
The markets into which any of our product candidates would be launched, if approved, are also highly competitive and continually evolving.
•For PNT2002 and 1095, our principal competitors in the field of mCRPC for radiopharmaceutical therapeutics may include Novartis AG; Telix Pharmaceuticals Limited; Curium and Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., each of which have product candidates in development.
•For PNT2003, our principal competitor may include Novartis AG.
•For flurpiridaz, our principal competitors may include rubidium generators from Bracco and Jubilant Radiopharma.
We cannot anticipate their competitivethe actions of our current or future competitors in the same or competing diagnostic modalities, such as significant price reductions on products that are comparable to our own, development of new products or other technologies that are more cost-effective or have superior performance than our current products or the introduction of generic versions after our proprietary products lose their current patent protection. In addition, distributors of our products could attempt to shift end-users to competing diagnostic modalities and products, or bundle the sale of a portfolio of products, to the detriment of our specific products. Our current or future products could be rendered obsolete or uneconomical as a result of these activities.
Further, the radiopharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical industry continues to evolve strategically, with several market participants either recently sold or for sale. In addition, the supply-demand dynamics of the industry are complex because of large market positions of some participants, legacy businesses, government subsidies (in particular, relating to the manufacture of radioisotopes), and group purchasing arrangements. We cannot predict what impact new owners and new operators may have on the strategic decision-making of our competitors, customers and suppliers.
Raw Materials and Supply Relationships
We rely on certain raw materials and supplies to produce our products. Due to the specialized nature of our products and the limited, and sometimes intermittent, supply of raw materials available in the market, we have established relationships with several key suppliers. For the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, our largest suppliers of raw materials and supplies were Institute for Radioelements (“IRE”), ANSTOthe Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (“ANSTO”) and NTP Radioisotopes (“NTP”), which, in the aggregate, accounted for approximately 26%11.9% of our total purchases.
Molybdenum-99
Our TechneLite, CardioliteCARDIOLITE and NeuroliteNEUROLITE products all rely on Mo-99, the radioisotope which is produced by bombarding uranium with neutrons in research reactors. With a 66-hour half-life, Mo-99 decays into, among other things, Tc-99m, another radioisotope with a half-life of six hours. Tc-99m is the isotope that is attached to radiopharmaceuticals, including our own CardioliteNEUROLITE and Neurolite,CARDIOLITE, during the labeling process and is the most common radioisotope used for medical diagnostic imaging purposes.
We currently purchase finished Mo-99 from three of the four main processing sites in the world, namely IRE in Belgium, NTP in South Africa and ANSTO in Australia. These processing sites provide us Mo-99 from five of the six main Mo-99-producing reactors in the world, namely BR2 in Belgium, LVR-15 in the Czech Republic, HFR in The Netherlands, SAFARI in South Africa and OPAL in Australia.
Our agreement with IRE (the “IRE Agreement”) contains minimum percentage volume requirements and unit pricing. The IRE Agreement also requires IRE to provide certain favorable allocations of Mo-99 during periods of supply shortage or failure. The IRE Agreement also provides for an increased supply of Mo-99 derived from LEU targets upon IRE’s completion of its ongoing conversion program to modify its facilities and processes in accordance with Belgian nuclear security commitments. The IRE Agreement allows for termination upon the occurrence of certain events, including failure by IRE to provide our required amount of Mo-99, material breach of any provision by either party, bankruptcy by either party or force majeure events. The IRE Agreement expires on December 31, 2020,2023, and is renewableautomatically renews on an annual basis thereafter, subject to prior notice of non-renewal by LMI on a year-to-year basis thereafter.either party.
Our agreement with NTP (the “NTP Agreement”), with NTP acting for itself and on behalf of its subcontractor ANSTO, specifies LMI’sour percentage purchase requirements and unit pricing, and provides for the supply of Mo-99 derived from LEU targets from NTP and ANSTO. ANSTO’s newThe NTP Agreement allows for termination upon the occurrence of certain events, including failure by NTP to provide our required amount of Mo-99, processing facility, could eventually increase ANSTO’s production capacity from approximately 2,000 curies per week to 3,500 curies per week with additional committed financial and operational resources. At full ramp-up capacity, ANSTO’s new facility could provide incremental supply to ourmaterial breach of any provision by either party, bankruptcy by either party or force majeure events. The NTP Agreement expires on December 31, 2024.
Although we have a globally diversifieddiverse Mo-99 supply chainwith IRE in Belgium, NTP in South Africa, and therefore mitigate some risk amongANSTO in Australia, we still face supplier and logistical challenges in our Mo-99 supply chain. When one supplier experiences outages, we generally rely on Mo-99 supply from the other suppliers althoughto limit the impact of the outages. We believe we can give no assuranceseffectively manage these various supply chain challenges, but depending on reactor and processor schedules and operations, at times we have not been able to that effect and afill some or all of the demand for our TechneLite generators on certain manufacturing days. A prolonged disruption of service from one of our three Mo-99 processing sites or one of their main Mo-99-producing reactors could have a substantial negative effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Despite our globally diverse Mo-99 suppliers, we still face challenges in our Mo-99 supply chain. The NTP processing facility had periodic outages in 2017, 2018 and 2019. When NTP was not producing, we relied on Mo-99 supply from both IRE and ANSTO
to limit the impact of the NTP outages. In the second quarter of 2019, ANSTO experienced facility issues in its existing Mo-99 processing facility which resulted in a decrease in Mo-99 available to us. In addition, as ANSTO transitioned from its existing Mo-99 processing facility to its new Mo-99 processing facility in the second quarter of 2019, ANSTO experienced start-up and transition challenges, which also resulted in a decrease in Mo-99 available to us. Further, starting in late June 2019 and through the date of this filing, ANSTO’s new Mo-99 processing facility has experienced unscheduled production outages, and we are now relying on IRE and NTP to limit the impact of those ANSTO outages. Because of these various supply chain constraints, depending on reactor and processor schedules and operations, we have not been able to fill some or all of the demand for our TechneLite generators on certain manufacturing days.
We are also pursuing additional sources of Mo-99 from potential new producers around the world to furtherTo augment our current supply. In November 2014,supply of Mo-99, we entered intohave a strategic arrangement with SHINE Technologies LLC (“SHINE”) for the future supply of Mo-99. Under the terms of the supply agreement, entered into in November 2014, SHINE will provide Mo-99 produced using its proprietary LEU-solution technology for use in our TechneLite generators once SHINE’s facility becomes operational and receives all necessary regulatory approvals, which SHINE now estimates will occur in 2022.2024. The term of this arrangement provides for three years of supply of Mo-99. However, we cannot assure you that SHINE or any other possible additional sources of Mo-99 will result inbe able to produce commercial quantities of Mo-99 for our business, or that these new suppliersSHINE, together with our current suppliers, will be able to deliver a sufficient quantity of Mo-99 to meet our needs.
Xenon
Xenon is a by-product of the Mo-99 production process. Under a strategic agreement we entered into in 2015,2021, we receive from IRE bulk unprocessed Xenon, which we process and finish for our customers at our North Billerica, Massachusetts manufacturing facility. That contract runs through June 30, 2022,December 31, 2023, with auto-renewal provisions and is subject to further extension.terminable upon notice of non-renewal. Until we can qualify an additional source of bulk unprocessed Xenon, we will rely on IRE as a sole source provider.
Iodine 131
Iodine 131 is also a by-product of the Mo-99 production process, and it is the active radioisotope ingredient in both AZEDRA and 1095. We receive Iodine 131 from IRE in Belgium and NTP in South Africa. We use Iodine 131 at our Somerset facility to manufacture and produce AZEDRA. We also rely on Center for Probe Development and Commercialization (“CPDC”) in Canada for our clinical supply requirements for 1095. CPDC sources Iodine 131 from IRE in Belgium and NTP in South Africa.
Other Materials
We have additional supply arrangements for active pharmaceutical ingredients, excipients, packaging materials and other materials and components, none of which are exclusive, but a number of which are sole source, and all of which we currently believe are either in good standing or replaceable without any material disruption to our business.
See Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for information regarding certain risks associated with our raw materials and supply arrangements.
Manufacturing
The commercial manufacture of PYLARIFY required us to create a field-based network of specialized PMFs with radioisotope-producing cyclotrons. The radioisotope used in PYLARIFY is F 18, which has a 110 minute half-life, requiring that this agent be manufactured and distributed rapidly to end-users. After being made on a cyclotron at a PMF, the F 18 is then combined with certain chemical ingredients in specially designed chemistry synthesis boxes to manufacture PYLARIFY. The finished PYLARIFY is then quality control tested and transferred to a radiopharmacist who prepares and dispenses patient-specific doses from the final product. Because each of the PMFs manufacturing PYLARIFY is deemed by the FDA to be a separate manufacturing site, each requires separate FDA approval. Flurpiridaz, if approved by the FDA, will have a manufacturing and PMF approval process similar to PYLARIFY.
We maintainhave a specialized in-house manufacturing operationsfacility at our North Billerica Massachusettscampus for purposes of producing DEFINITY and, potentially, other sterile vial products. On February 22, 2022, we received FDA approval of our sNDA, authorizing commercial manufacturing of DEFINITY at our new facility. DEFINITY manufactured at this facility became commercially available on February 23, 2022. We believe this investment will allow us to better manage DEFINITY manufacturing and inventory, reduce our costs in a potentially more price competitive environment, and provide us with supply chain redundancy.
We also manufacture TechneLite on a highly automated production line Thallium and Gallium and certain radiochemicals using our cyclotron technology, and we process and finish Xenon and Quadramet using ouron a hot cell infrastructure.line at our North Billerica, Massachusetts facility. We also maintainoperate a manufacturing operationsfacility at Somerset, NJ, using a hot cell line for AZEDRA. During 2021, we increased the manufacturing staff at our San Juan, Puerto Rico radiopharmacy and PETSomerset facility to help maintain an adequate supply of AZEDRA. We also began constructing an additional manufacturing facility where we manufacture FDG using cyclotron technology. suite at Somerset which, if approved by the FDA, could provide redundancy for AZEDRA manufacturing as well as increased overall future capacity for 1095, if approved by the FDA or other iodine-based products.
We manufacture, finish and distribute our radiopharmaceutical products on a just-in-time basis, and supply our customers with these products either by next day delivery services or by either ground or air custom logistics. We believe that our substantial capital investments in our highly automated generator production line and our cyclotronsother manufacturing assets, which we have made over the years, and our extensive experience in complying with the stringent regulatory requirements for the handling of nuclear materials and operations in a highly regulated environment, create significant and sustainable competitive advantages for us.
In addition to our in-house manufacturing capabilities, a substantial portion of our products are manufactured by third party contract manufacturing organizations, and in certain instances, we rely on them for sole source manufacturing. To ensure the quality of the products that are manufactured by third parties, the key raw materials used in those products are first sent to our North Billerica, Massachusetts facility, where we test them prior to the third party manufacturing of the final product. AfterFor many of our products, after the final products are manufactured, they are sent back to us for final quality control testing, and then we ship them to our customers. We have expertise in the design, development and validation of complex manufacturing systems and processes, and our strong execution and quality control culture supports the just-in-time manufacturing model at our North Billerica, Massachusetts facility.
We are also in the final stages of an extensive, multi-year effort to add specialized manufacturing capabilities at our North Billerica, Massachusetts facility. This project is part of a larger corporate growth strategy to create a competitive advantage in specialized manufacturing. This project should not only deliver efficiencies and supply chain redundancy for our current portfolio but should also afford us increased flexibility as we consider external opportunities. We currently expect to be in a position to use this in-house manufacturing capability by early 2021. However, we can give no assurance that we will be successful in these efforts or that we will be able to successfully manufacture any additional commercial products at our North Billerica, Massachusetts facility.
facilities.
Manufacturing and Supply Arrangements
We currently have the following technology transfer and manufacturing and supply agreements in place for some of our major products:
•PYLARIFY—We have entered into commercial supply agreements with different PMF networks. Our agreements with our PMF networks allow for the termination upon the occurrence of specified events, including material breach or bankruptcy by either party, and have various termination dates generally terminating between 2025 to 2027 and subject to renewal provisions.
•DEFINITY, CARDIOLITE and NEUROLITE—In February 2012,2022, we entered into a new Manufacturing and Supply Agreement with JHS, for the manufacture of DEFINITY. Under theDEFINITY, CARDIOLITE, NEUROLITE and evacuation vials. The new agreement, which superseded all of our prior agreements with JHS manufactured DEFINITY for us for an initial term of five years. In September 2016, we extended the agreement through January 2022. The agreement contains automatic renewals for additional one-year periods thereafter.those products, expires on December 31, 2027, and can be renewed upon mutual consent. The agreement allows for termination upon the occurrence of certain events such as a material breach or default by either party, or bankruptcy by either party. The agreement also requires us to place orders fororder from JHS a specified minimum percentage of our requirements for DEFINITY with JHS.and fixed quantities of CARDIOLITE and NEUROLITE each year during the contract term. Based on our current projections, we believe that we will have sufficient supply of DEFINITY from JHS to meet expected demand.
On May 3, 2016, we entered into a Manufacturing and Supply Agreement with SBL to perform technology transferour in-house manufacturing facility and process development services to manufacture and supply a modified formulation of DEFINITY. There are no minimum purchase requirements under this agreement, which has an initial term of five years from the date of first commercial sale and is renewable at our option for an additional five years. This agreement allows for termination upon the occurrence of certain events, including material breach or bankruptcy of either party. We cannot give any assurances as to when those technology transfer activities will be completed and when we will begin to receive supply of a modified formulation of DEFINITY from SBL.
Cardiolite—In May 2012, we entered into a Manufacturing and Supply Agreement with JHS for the manufacture of Cardiolite products. In the third quarter of 2016, we completed the technology transfer process and received FDA approval to manufacture Cardiolite at JHS. Under the agreement, JHS has agreed to manufacture products for an initial term of five years from the effective date. On November 9, 2017, we extended the term until December 31, 2020, and the agreement can be further extended for three additional one-year periods thereafter so long as the parties, using good faith, reasonable efforts, agree to new pricing for the upcoming additional term. The agreement allows for termination upon the occurrence of specified events, including material breach or bankruptcy by either party. The agreement requires us to place orders for 100% of our requirements for Cardiolite products with JHS during such term. Based on our current projections, we believe that we will have sufficient supply of CardioliteCARDIOLITE and NEUROLITE products from JHS to meet expected demand.
Neurolite—In May 2012, we entered into a Manufacturing and Supply Agreement with JHS for the manufacture of Neurolite, and in January 2015, the FDA granted approval to manufacture Neurolite at JHS. Under the agreement, JHS agreed to manufacture Neurolite for an initial term of five years from the effective date. On November 9, 2017, we extended the term of the agreement until December 31, 2020, and the agreement can be further extended for three additional one-year periods thereafter so long as the parties, using good faith, reasonable efforts, agree to new pricing for the upcoming additional term. The agreement allows for termination upon the occurrence of specified events, including material breach or bankruptcy by either party. The agreement also requires us to place orders for 100% of our requirements for Neurolite during such term. Based on our current projections, we believe that we will have sufficient supply of Neurolite from JHS to meet expected demand.
Although we are pursuing additional third party manufacturing relationships to establish and secure additional long-term or alternative suppliers as described above, we are uncertain of the timing as to when these arrangements could provide meaningful quantities of our products.
See Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for information regarding certain risks associated with our manufacturing and supply relationships.
Clinical Development
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we invested $20.0 million, $17.1 million and $18.1 million in research and development (“R&D”), respectively. Our R&D team includes our Medical Affairs and Medical Information functions, which educate physicians on the scientific aspects of our commercial products and the approved indications. In addition to the DEFINITY clinical trials in China described above, we currently have three active clinical development programs.
Flurpiridaz F 18—PET Myocardial Perfusion
We have developed flurpiridaz F 18, an internally discovered small molecule radiolabeled with fluorine-18, as an imaging agent used in PET MPI to assess blood flow to the heart.
Today, most MPI procedures use SPECT technology. Although SPECT imaging used in conjunction with a radiopharmaceutical imaging agent, such as Cardiolite, is most commonly used for MPI studies, PET imaging has gained considerable support in the field of cardiovascular imaging as it offers many advantages to SPECT imaging, including: higher image quality, increased diagnostic certainty, more accurate risk stratification and reduced patient radiation exposure. PET imaging has demonstrated broad utility for diagnosis, prognosis, disease staging and therapeutic response. When used in combination with an appropriate radiopharmaceutical imaging agent, PET imaging can provide important insights into physiologic and metabolic processes in the body and be useful in evaluating a variety of conditions including heart disease, neurological disease and cancer. In addition, PET MPI imaging could be particularly useful in difficult-to-image patients, including women and obese patients. The use of PET technology in MPI tests represents a broad emerging application for a technology more commonly associated with oncology and neurology. We anticipate that the adoption of PET technology in MPI tests will increase significantly in the future.
Flurpiridaz F 18 Clinical Overview and Phase 3 Program
We submitted an Investigational New Drug Application (“IND”) for flurpiridaz F 18 to the FDA in August 2006. Our clinical program to date has consisted of three Phase 1 studies, a Phase 2 clinical trial, conducted from 2007 to 2010, involving 176 subjects who received PET MPI performed with flurpiridaz F 18 and completed the trial, and a Phase 3 clinical trial (“301 Trial”) conducted from 2011 to 2013.
The 301 Trial was an open-label, multicenter, international study with 755 subjects with known or suspected coronary artery disease (“CAD”) and scheduled for coronary angiography and SPECT imaging who completed the trial and were included in the efficacy analysis. Subjects underwent flurpiridaz F 18 PET MPI and SPECT MPI studies with coronary angiography used as the truth standard for each. The study then compared MPI imaging using flurpiridaz F 18 versus SPECT imaging with primary endpoints of superiority for sensitivity (identifying disease) and non-inferiority for specificity (ruling out disease).
In the fourth quarter of 2013, we announced preliminary results from the 301 Trial, and in May 2015, after a re-read of the 301 Trial results, we announced the complete results from the 301 Trial. Flurpiridaz F 18 appeared to be well-tolerated from a safety perspective, and PET MPI with flurpiridaz F 18 consistently showed a balanced performance in sensitivity and specificity, when compared to coronary angiography, while SPECT imaging results were skewed with low sensitivity and high specificity when compared to coronary angiography. When results were compared to one another, flurpiridaz F 18 imaging substantially outperformed SPECT imaging in sensitivity but did not meet the non-inferiority endpoint in specificity, implying a substantial and unexpected under-diagnosis of CAD with SPECT imaging in the trial.
In subgroup analyses, the risk-benefit profile of flurpiridaz F 18 appeared to be favorable in women, obese patients, patients with multi-vessel disease and diabetics. A significantly higher percentage of images were rated as either excellent or good with flurpiridaz F 18 imaging as compared to SPECT imaging, leading to a greater diagnostic certainty of interpretation. Importantly, radiation exposure associated with flurpiridaz F 18 imaging was reduced to approximately 50% of SPECT imaging. In addition, no drug-related serious adverse events were observed.
GE Healthcare Collaboration
In April 2017, we announced that we entered into a definitive, exclusive Collaboration and License Agreement (the “License Agreement”) with GE Healthcare for the continued Phase 3 development and worldwide commercialization of flurpiridaz F 18. Under the License Agreement, GE Healthcare will complete the worldwide development of flurpiridaz F 18, pursue worldwide regulatory approvals and, if successful, lead a worldwide launch and commercialization of the agent, with us collaborating on both development and commercialization through a joint steering committee.
The second Phase 3 clinical trial is underway, as a prospective, open-label, international, multi-center trial of flurpiridaz F 18 for PET MPI in patients referred for invasive coronary angiography because of suspected CAD. The trial will enroll up to 650 participants, with a target completion date in the second half of 2020, although that timing cannot be assured. The primary outcome measure for the trial is the diagnostic efficacy of flurpiridaz F 18 PET MPI in the detection of significant CAD, with secondary outcome measures of diagnostic efficacy of flurpiridaz F 18 PET MPI compared with SPECT MPI in the detection of CAD in all patients. Secondary analysis will be performed in patients of special clinical interest, such as female, obese and diabetic patients, where current SPECT MPI technologies have shown certain limitations in the diagnostic performance.
LMI 1195 (flubrobenguan F18)
We have developed LMI 1195, an internally discovered small molecule imaging agent for the norepinephrine pathway. We originally pursued developing LMI 1195 for the diagnostic assessment of ischemic heart failure patients at risk of sudden cardiac death who may benefit from an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). However, after multiple interactions with the FDA, we have concluded that the cardiac clinical development program for this indication would be longer and more expensive than we had
initially envisioned. As a result, we have paused in pursuing this particular indication but may consider other possible cardiac indications in the future.
We are now designing two Phase 3 clinical trials for the use of LMI 1195 for the diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumors in pediatric and adult populations, respectively. The FDA has granted an Orphan Drug designation for the use of LMI 1195 in the management indication. We have also received notice of eligibility for a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher for a subsequent human drug application so long as LMI 1195 is approved by the FDA for its rare pediatric disease indication prior to September 30, 2022.
DEFINITY - LVEF
As part of our microbubble franchise strategy, we conducted two Phase 3, open-label, multicenter studies to evaluate LVEF measurement accuracy and reproducibility of DEFINITY contrast-enhanced and unenhanced echocardiography as compared to non-contrast CMRI used as the truth standard. The first of the two trials, BENEFIT 1, enrolled 145 subjects. After reviewing the study results from BENEFIT 1, we concluded there was no statistically significant improvement in the accuracy of LVEF values for contrast-enhanced echocardiography versus unenhanced echocardiography as compared to CMRI. In addition, analyses of the secondary endpoints revealed no improvement in inter-reader variability between the contrast-enhanced and unenhanced echocardiograms for LVEF assessments. A post-hoc analysis, however, did show statistically significant improvements in left ventricular diastolic, systolic and stroke volume measurements with contrast-enhanced versus unenhanced echocardiography when compared to CMRI. We will continue to analyze the BENEFIT 1 data, and when the data from BENEFIT 2 are available, we will compile the data sets to analyze the full results of the trials.
See Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for information regarding certain risks associated with our clinical development programs.
Strategic Activities
We continue to evaluate a number of different opportunities to acquire or in-license additional products, businesses and technologies to drive our future growth. We are particularly interested in expanding our presence in oncology, in radiotherapeutics as well as diagnostics. In addition to the Progenics Transaction described above, we recently entered into a strategic collaboration and license agreement with NanoMab Technology Limited, a privately-held biopharmaceutical company focusing on the development of next generation radiopharmaceuticals for cancer precision medicine. We believe this collaboration will provide the first broadly-available imaging biomarker research tool to pharmaceutical companies and academic centers conducting research and development on PD-L1 immuno-oncology treatments, including combination therapies. We can give no assurance as to when or if this collaboration will be successful or accretive to earnings.
In addition, as described above, we continue to expand our microbubble franchise. We recently announced a strategic development and commercial collaboration with Cerevast in which our microbubble will be used in connection with Cerevast’s ocular ultrasound device to target improving blood flow in occluded retinal veins in the eye. Retinal vein occlusion is one of the most common causes of vision loss worldwide. We also recently announced a strategic commercial supply agreement with CarThera for the use of our microbubbles in combination with SonoCloud, a proprietary implantable device in development for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma, Glioblastoma is a lethal and devasting from of brain cancer with median survival of 15 months after diagnosis.
See Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for information regarding certain risks associated with our strategic activities.
Intellectual Property
Patents, trademarks and other intellectual property rights, both in the U.S. and foreign countries, are very important to our business. We also rely on trade secrets, manufacturing know-how, technological innovations, licensing agreements and confidentiality agreements to maintain and improve our competitive position. We review third party proprietary rights, including patents and patent applications, as available, in an effort to develop an effective intellectual property strategy, avoid infringement of third party proprietary rights, identify licensing opportunities and monitor the intellectual property owned by others. Our ability to enforce, defend and protect our intellectual property rights may be limited in certain countries outside the U.S., which could make it easier for competitors to capture market position in those countries by utilizing technologies that are similar to those developed or licensed by us. Competitors also may harm our sales by designing products that mirror the capabilities of our products or technology without infringing our intellectual property rights. If we do not obtain sufficient protection for our intellectual property, or if we are unable to effectively enforce or defend our intellectual property rights or our freedom to operate, our competitiveness could be impaired, which would limit our growth and future revenue.
Trademarks, Service Marks and Trade Names
We own various trademarks, service marks and trade names, including, among others, PYLARIFY, DEFINITY, TechneLite, Cardiolite, Neurolite, Vialmix, Quadramet, LuminityAZEDRA and Lantheus Medical Imaging.Find.Fight.Follow. We have generally registered these trademarks, as well as others, in the U.S. and/or numerous foreign jurisdictions.
Patents
We actively seek to protect the proprietary technology that we consider important to our business, including chemical species, compositions and formulations, their methods of use and processes for their manufacture, as new intellectual property is developed. In addition to seeking patent protection in the U.S., we file patent applications in numerous foreign countries in order to further protect the inventions that we consider important to the development of our international business. We also rely upon trade secrets and contracts to protect our proprietary information. As of December 31, 2019, our patent portfolio included a total of 43 issued U.S. patents, 284 issued foreign patents, 22 pending U.S. patent applications and 160 pending foreign applications. These patents and patent applications include claims covering the composition of matter and methods of use for all of our preclinical and clinical stage agents.information.
We have patent protection on certain of our commercial products and on all of our clinical development candidates. We typically seek patent protection in major markets around the world, including, among others, the U.S., Canada, Western Europe, Asia, Central America and LatinSouth America. All patent terms described below are presented without giving effect to any applicable patent term adjustments or regulatory extensions.
PYLARIFY - We actively pursue patents in connection with PYLARIFY, both in the U.S. and internationally. In the U.S. for PYLARIFY, we have four Orange Book-listed patents, including composition of matter patents, the last of which expire in 2037. Outside of the U.S., we have, and are currently pursuing, additional PYLARIFY patents to obtain similar patent protection as in the U.S.
DEFINITY - We continue to actively pursue additional patents in connection with DEFINITY and DEFINITY RT, both in the U.S. and internationally. In the U.S., for DEFINITY, we have ansix Orange Book-listed method of use patent expiringpatents, one of which expires in March2035 and five of which expire in 2037, andas well as additional manufacturing patents that are not Orange Book-listed expiring in 2021, 2023 and 2037. In the U.S. for DEFINITY RT, we have eight Orange Book-listed patents, including two composition of matter patents which expire in 2035. Outside of the U.S., while our DEFINITY patent protection and regulatory exclusivity have generally expired, we are currently prosecutingpursuing additional DEFINITY and DEFINITY RT patents to try to obtain similar method of use patent protection as granted in the U.S. The Orange Book-listed patents include a patent on the use of VIALMIX RFID which expires in 2037; additional VIALMIX RFID patent applications have been submitted in major markets throughout the world.
Even though our longest duration Orange Book-listed DEFINITY patent extends until March 2037, because our Orange Book-listed composition of matter patent expired in June 2019, we may face generic DEFINITY challengers in the near to intermediate term. Under the Hatch-Waxman Act, the FDA can approve Abbreviated New Drug Applications (“ANDAs”) for generic versions of drugs if the ANDA applicant demonstrates, among other things, that (i) its generic candidate is the same as the innovator product by establishing bioequivalence and providing relevant chemistry, manufacturing and product data, and (ii) either the marketing of that generic candidate does not infringe anthe Orange Book-listed patent.patent(s) or the Orange Book-listed patent(s) is invalid. Similarly, the FDA can approve a Section 505(b)(2) NDA from an applicant that relies on some of the information required for marketing approval to come from studies which the applicant does not own or have a legal right of reference. With respect to anythe Orange Book-listed patentpatent(s) covering thean innovator product, the ANDA applicant or the Section 505(b)(2) applicant (if relying on studies related to the innovator product) (together, the “Applicant”) must give a notice (a “Notice”) to the innovator (a “Notice”) that the ANDA applicant certifiesof its certification that its generic candidate will not infringe the innovator’s Orange Book-listed patentpatent(s) or that the Orange Book-listed patentpatent(s) is invalid. The innovator can then challengefile suit against the ANDA applicant in courtApplicant within 45 days of receiving thatthe Notice, and FDA approval to commercialize the generic candidate will be stayed (that is, delayed) for up to 30 months (measured from the date on which a Notice is received) while the patent dispute between the innovator and the ANDA applicantApplicant is resolved in court. The 30 month30-month stay could potentially expire sooner if the courts determine that no infringement had occurred or that the challenged Orange Book-listed patent is invalid or if the parties otherwise settle their dispute.
As of the date of filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have not received any Notice from an ANDA applicant.Applicant. If we were to (i) receive any such Notice in the future, (ii) bring a patent infringement suit against the ANDA applicantApplicant within 45 days of receiving suchthat Notice, and (iii) successfully obtain the full 30 month30-month stay, then the ANDA applicantApplicant would be precluded from commercializing a generic candidateversion of DEFINITY prior to the expiration of such 30 monththat 30-month stay period and, potentially, thereafter, depending on how athe patent dispute is resolved. Solely by way of example and not based on any knowledge we currently have, if we received a Notice from an ANDA applicantApplicant in March 20202023 and the full 30 month30-month stay waswere obtained, then the ANDA applicantApplicant would be precluded from commercialization until at least September 2022.2025. If we received a Notice some number of months in the future and the full 30 month30-month stay waswere obtained, the commercialization date would roll forward in the future by the same calculation.number of months. In the event a 505(b)(2) applicant does not rely on studies related to the innovator product, the 30-month stay would not apply, but additional clinical studies may be required.
TechneLite - We currently have patent protectionown patents in the U.S. and various foreign countries on certain component technology expiring in 2029.2029, and we are pursuing additional patent protection in the U.S. and world-wide on other component technology that, if granted, would expire in 2040. In addition, given the significant know-how and trade secrets associated with the methods of manufacturing and assembling the TechneLite generator, we believe we have a substantial amount of valuable and defensible proprietary intellectual property associated with the product.
PYLARIFY AI- U.S. Patents and pending patent applications worldwide relating to automated medical image analysis, have expiration ranging from 2037 to 2041.
Other Nuclear Products - Neither CardioliteCARDIOLITE nor NeuroliteNEUROLITE is covered any longer by patent protection in either the U.S. or the rest of the world. Xenon, Thallium and Gallium have no patent protection; however, weWe have patent protection in the U.S. that expires in October 2035 for an improved container for Xenon, and are pursuing similar patent protection outside the U.S.
RELISTOR - Although the composition of matter patent for the active ingredient, methylnaltrexone, has expired, there are additional patents and pending patent applications covering various inventions relating to the product. There are eight Orange Book listed patents that cover the subcutaneous RELISTOR product, which have expiration dates ranging from 2024 to 2030, and there are nine Orange Book listed patents that cover the RELISTOR tablet product, which have expiration dates ranging from 2029 to 2031.
Progenics has entered into four separate settlement agreements that have granted non-exclusive limited licenses with respect to certain RELISTOR subcutaneous injection applications. The non-exclusive limited licenses with three parties are currently effective on January 1, 2028 and the fourth non-exclusive limited license is currently effective on July 1, 2028, in each case, subject to potential acceleration clauses in those agreements. Four Canadian patents (two expiring in 2024, one in 2027 and one in 2029) have been listed with Health Canada relating to subcutaneous RELISTOR.
AZEDRA - The AZEDRA technology patent family was licensed from the University of Western Ontario (“UWO”). While certain of those patents, and associated license, have already expired, a patent relating to alternative approaches for preparing AZEDRA (not currently implemented) expires worldwide in 2024. In addition, we own patents and pending applications worldwide for precursors, pharmaceutical compositions, kits, and manufacturing improvements, including in the U.S. a manufacturing method expiring in 2035.
aBSI - We own patents relating to automated detection of bone cancer metastases. The patents on this technology expire in the U.S. in 2032 and outside of the U.S. in 2028. Further, we own a U.S. patent and have patent applications that are pending in the U.S. and worldwide relating to aBSI improvements, which have expiration ranging from 2040 to 2041.
Clinical Development Candidatesflurpiridaz - We haveown patents and patent applications in numerous jurisdictions covering composition, use, formulation and manufacturing, of flurpiridaz F 18, including in the U.S. a composition of matter patent expiring in 2026, a formulation patent expiring in 2032, a method of use patent expiring in 2028, and a method of manufacturing patentmanufacturing-related patents expiring in 2031 in the absence of any regulatory extension,and 2033, and various patent applications, onesome of which, if granted, will expire in 2033 in the absence of any2033.
PNT-2002 - We exclusively license granted U.S. patents and pending U.S. patent term adjustment or regulatory extensions. We also have patents andapplications as well as pending patent applications in numerous jurisdictions covering composition,outside of the U.S. directed to formulations, use and manufacturemanufacturing of LMI 1195, includingPNT-2002. The granted U.S. patents expire in 2041.
PNT-2003 - We exclusively license pending U.S. patent applications as well as pending patent applications in jurisdictions outside of the U.S. directed to formulations, use and manufacturing of PNT-2003 which, if granted, would expire in 2041.
1095 - We own patents relating to 1095 that expire from 2027 to 2031, with the composition of matter as well as radiolabeled forms in the U.S. a composition patentand Europe expiring in 2027. Additional U.S. patents for stable compositions and radiolabeling processes expire, respectively, in 2030 a methodand 2031.
1404 - We own patents relating to composition of use patentmatter, as well as technetium-99 labeled forms of 1404 expiring in 2027,the U.S. from 2029 to 2030, and manufacturing-related patents expiring worldwide in 2031 and 2032, in the absence of any regulatory extension, and patent applications which, if granted, will expire in 2027 and in 2031 in the absence of any patent term adjustment or regulatory extensions.2029.
In addition to patents, we rely, where necessary, upon unpatented trade secrets and know-how, proprietary information and continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain our competitive position. We seek to protect our proprietary information, in part, using confidentiality agreements with our collaborators, employees, consultants and other third parties and invention assignment agreements with our employees. These confidentiality agreements may not prevent unauthorized disclosure of trade secrets and other proprietary information, and we cannot provide assurances that an employee or an outside party will not make an unauthorized disclosure of our trade secrets, other technical know-how or proprietary information. We may not have adequate monitoring abilities to discover, or adequate remedies for, any unauthorized disclosure. This might happen intentionally or inadvertently. It is possible that a competitor will make use of such information, and that our competitive position will be compromised, in spite of any legal action we might take against persons making such unauthorized disclosures. In addition, our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently discovered by competitors. To the extent that our collaborators, employees and consultants use intellectual property owned by others in their work for us, disputes may arise as to the rights in related or resulting know-how and inventions.
In addition, we license a limited number of third party technologies and other intellectual property rights that are incorporated into some elements of our drug discovery and development efforts. TheseSome of these licenses are not material to our business and– for example, the technologies can be obtainedlicenses on the PYLARIFY patent family from multiple sources. We are currently party to separate royalty-free, non-exclusive, cross-licenses with each of Bracco, GE Healthcare and Imcor Pharmaceutical Company. These cross-licenses give us freedom to operate in connection with contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging technology.Johns Hopkins University (“JHU”).
See Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for information regarding certain risks associated with our intellectual property.
Regulatory Matters
Food and Drug Laws
The development, manufacture and commercialization of our agents and products are subject to comprehensive governmental regulation both within and outside the U.S. A number of factors substantially increase the time, difficulty and costs incurred in obtaining and maintaining the approval to market newly developed and existing products. These factors include governmental regulation, such as detailed inspection of and controls over research and laboratory procedures, clinical investigations, manufacturing, marketing, sampling, distribution, import and export, record keeping and storage and disposal practices, together with various post-marketing requirements. Governmental regulatory actions can result in the seizure or recall of products, suspension or revocation of the authority necessary for their production and sale as well as other civil or criminal sanctions.
Our activities related to the development, manufacture, packaging or repackaging of our pharmaceutical and medical device products subject us to a wide variety of laws and regulations. We are required to register for permits and/or licenses with, seek approvals from and comply with operating and security standards of, the FDA, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”), the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), Health Canada, the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”), the U.K. Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (“MHRA”), the CFDANMPA and various state and provincial boards of pharmacy, state and provincial controlled substance agencies, state and provincial health departments and/or comparable state and provincial agencies, as well as foreign agencies, and certain accrediting bodies depending upon the type of operations and location of product distribution, manufacturing and sale.
The FDA and various state regulatory authorities regulate the research, testing, manufacture, safety, labeling, storage, recordkeeping, premarket approval, marketing, advertising and promotion, import and export, and sales and distribution of pharmaceutical products in the U.S. Prior to marketing a pharmaceutical product, we must first receive FDA approval. In the U.S., the FDA regulates drugs under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”) and implementing regulations. The process of obtaining regulatory approvals and compliance with appropriate federal, state, local, and foreign statutes and regulations requires the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources. Currently, the process required by the FDA before a drug product may be marketed in the U.S. generally involves the following:
•Completion of preclinical laboratory tests, animal studies and formulation studies according to current Good Laboratory Practices regulations;
•Submission to the FDA of an INDinvestigational new drug application (“IND”) which must become effective before human clinical studies may begin, including review and approval by any individualinstitutional review board (“IRB”), serving any of the institutions participating in the clinical studies;
•Performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical studies according to current Good Clinical Practices and other requirements, to establish the safety and efficacy of the proposed drug product for its intended use;
•Submission to the FDA of a new drug application or NDA,(“NDA”) for a new drug;
•Satisfactory completion of an FDA inspection of the manufacturing facility or facilities at which the drug product is produced to assess compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices (“cGMPs”) regulations; and
•FDA review and approval of the NDA.
The testing and approval process requires substantial time, effort, and financial resources, and we cannot be certain that any approvals for our agents in development will be granted on a timely basis, if at all. Once a pharmaceutical agent is identified for development, it enters the preclinical testing stage. Preclinical tests include laboratory evaluations of product chemistry, toxicity, formulation, and stability, as well as animal studies to assess its potential safety and efficacy. This testing culminates in the submission of the IND to the FDA.
Once the IND becomes effective, including review and approval by any IRB serving any of the institutions participating in the clinical trial, the clinical trial program may begin. Each new clinical trial protocol must be submitted to the FDA before the study may begin. Human clinical studies are typically conducted in three sequential phases that may overlap or be combined:
•Phase 1. The agent is initially introduced into healthy human subjects and tested for safety, dosage tolerance, absorption, metabolism, distribution and excretion. In the case of some products for severe or life-threatening diseases, especially when the agent may be too inherently toxic to ethically administer to healthy volunteers, the initial human testing is often conducted in patients with those diseases.
•Phase 2. Involves studies in a limited patient population to identify possible adverse effects and safety risks, to evaluate preliminarily the efficacy of the agent for specific targeted diseases and to determine dosage tolerance and optimal dosage and schedule.
•Phase 3. Clinical studies are undertaken to further evaluate dosage, clinical efficacy and safety in an expanded patient population at geographically dispersed clinical study sites. These studies are intended to collect sufficient safety and efficacy data to support the NDA for FDA approval.
Clinical trial sponsors may request a Special Protocol Assessment (“SPA”) from the FDA. The FDA’s SPA process creates a written agreement between the sponsoring company and the FDA regarding the clinical trial design and other clinical trial issues that can be used to support approval of an agent. The SPA is intended to provide assurance that, if the agreed-upon clinical trial protocols are followed and the trial endpoints are achieved, then the data may serve as the primary basis for an efficacy claim in support of an NDA. However, the SPA agreement is not a guarantee of an approval of an agent or any permissible claims about the agent. In particular, the SPA is not binding on the FDA if public health concerns become evident that are unrecognized at the time that the SPA agreement is entered into, other new scientific concerns regarding product safety or efficacy arise, or if the clinical trial sponsor fails to comply with the agreed upon clinical trial protocols.
Progress reports detailing the results of the clinical studies must be submitted at least annually to the FDA and safety reports must be submitted to the FDA and the investigators for serious and unexpected adverse events. Submissions must also be made to inform the FDA of certain changes to the clinical trial protocol. Federal law also requires the sponsor to register the trials on public databases when they are initiated, and to disclose the results of the trials on public databases upon completion. Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 testing may not be completed successfully within any specified period, if at all. The FDA or the clinical trial sponsor may suspend or terminate a clinical study at any time on various grounds, including a finding that the research subjects or patients are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk. Similarly, any IRB serving any of the institutions participating in the clinical trial can suspend or terminate approval of a clinical study at a relevant institution if the clinical study is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB’s requirements or if the agent has been associated with unexpected serious harm to patients. Failure to register a clinical trial or disclose study results within the required time periods could result in penalties, including civil monetary penalties.
Concurrent with clinical studies, companies usually complete additional animal studies and must also develop additional information about the chemistry and physical characteristics of the product and finalize a process for manufacturing the product in commercial quantities in accordance with cGMP requirements. The manufacturing process must be capable of consistently producing quality batches of the agent and, among other things, the manufacturer must develop methods for testing the identity, strength, quality and purity of the final product. Additionally, appropriate packaging must be selected and tested and stability studies must be conducted to demonstrate that the agent does not undergo unacceptable deterioration over its shelf life.
The results of product development, preclinical studies and clinical studies, along with descriptions of the manufacturing process, analytical tests conducted on the drug product, proposed labeling, and other relevant information, are submitted to the FDA as part of an NDA for a new drug, requesting approval to market the agent. The submission of an NDA is subject to the payment of a substantial user fee. A waiver of that fee may be obtained under certain limited circumstances. The approval process is lengthy and difficult, and the FDA may refuse to approve an NDA if the applicable regulatory criteria are not satisfied. The FDA has substantial discretion in the product approval process, and it is impossible to predict whether and when the FDA will grant marketing approval. The FDA may on occasion require the sponsor of an NDA to conduct additional clinical studies or to provide other scientific or technical information about the product, and these additional requirements may lead to unanticipated delay or expense. Even if such data and information are submitted, the FDA may ultimately decide that the NDA does not satisfy the criteria for approval. Data obtained from clinical studies are not always conclusive, and the FDA may interpret data differently than we interpret the same data.
If a product receives regulatory approval, the approval may be significantly limited to specific diseases and dosages or the indications for use may otherwise be limited, which could restrict the commercial value of the product. Further, the FDA may require that certain contraindications, warnings or precautions be included in the product labeling. In addition, the FDA may require Phase 4 testing which involves clinical studies designed to further assess a drug product’s safety and effectiveness after NDA approval. The FDA also may impose aone or more Risk Evaluation and Mitigation StrategyStrategies (“REMS”) to ensure that the benefits of a product outweigh its risks. A REMS could add training requirements for healthcare professionals, safety communications efforts and limits on channels of distribution, among other things. The sponsor would be required to evaluate and monitor the various REMS activities and adjust them if need be. Whether a REMS would be imposed on any of our products and any resulting financial impact is uncertain at this time.
Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may designate a product as an Orphan Drug if it is a drug intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally defined as a patient population of fewer than 200,000 individuals annually in the United States, or a patient population greater than 200,000 in the United States where there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing the drug will be recovered from sales in the United States. AZEDRA currently has the Orphan Drug designation in the United States.
In the United States, Orphan Drug designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as opportunities for grant funding towards clinical trial costs, tax advantages and user-fee waivers. In addition, if a product that has Orphan Drug designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for the disease for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to Orphan Drug exclusivity, which means the FDA may not approve any other application to market the same drug for the same indication for a period of seven years, except in limited circumstances, such as a showing of clinical superiority over the product with orphan exclusivity or where the manufacturer is unable to assure sufficient product quantity.
Any drug products for which we receive FDA approvals are subject to continuing regulation by the FDA, including, among other things, record-keeping requirements, reporting of adverse experiences with the product, providing the FDA with updated safety and efficacy information, product sampling and distribution requirements, complying with certain electronic records and signature requirements, and complying with FDA promotion and advertising requirements. The FDA strictly regulates labeling, advertising, promotion and other types of information on drug products that are placed on the market. Drugs may be promoted only for the approved indications and consistent with the provisions of the approved label and promotional claims must be appropriately balanced with important safety information and otherwise be adequately substantiated. Further, manufacturers of drugs must continue to comply with cGMP requirements, which are extensive and require considerable time, resources and ongoing investment to ensure compliance. In addition, changes to the manufacturing process generally require prior FDA approval before being implemented, and other types of changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications and additional labeling claims, are also subject to further FDA review and approval.
Drug product manufacturers and other entities involved in the manufacturing and distribution of approved drugs products are required to register their establishments with the FDA and certain state agencies, and are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA and certain other agencies for compliance with cGMP and other laws. The cGMP requirements apply to all stages of the manufacturing process, including the production, processing, sterilization, packaging, labeling, storage and shipment of the drug product. Manufacturers must establish validated systems to ensure that products meet specifications and regulatory standards, and test each product batch or lot prior to its release. In addition, manufacturers of commercial PET products such as PYLARIFY, including radiopharmacies, hospitals and academic medical centers, are required to submit either an NDA or ANDA in order to produce PET drugs for clinical use, or produce the drugs under an IND.
The FDA also regulates the preclinical and clinical testing, design, manufacture, safety, efficacy, labeling, storage, record keeping, sales and distribution, post-market adverse event reporting, import/export and advertising and promotion of any medical devices that we distribute pursuant to the FDCA and FDA’s implementing regulations. The Federal Trade Commission shares jurisdiction with the FDA over the promotion and advertising of certain medical devices. The FDA can also impose restrictions on the sale, distribution or use of medical devices at the time of their clearance or approval, or subsequent to marketing. Currently, medical devices comprise only a small portion of our revenues.
The FDA may withdraw marketing authorization for a pharmaceutical or medical device product if compliance with regulatory standards is not maintained or if problems occur after the product reaches the market. Later discovery of previously unknownpreviously-unknown problems with a product may result in restrictions on the product or even complete withdrawal of the product from the market. Further, the failure to maintain compliance with regulatory requirements may result in administrative or judicial actions, such as fines, civil monetary penalties, warning letters, holds on clinical studies, product recalls or seizures, product detention or refusal to permit the import or export of pharmaceuticals or medical device products, refusal to approve pending applications or supplements, restrictions on marketing or manufacturing, injunctions, or civil or criminal penalties.
Regulations are subject to change as a result of legislative, administrative or judicial action, which may also increase our costs or reduce sales or otherwise adversely impact our products. For example, on April 16, 2021 in the case Genus Medical Technologies LLC v. Food and Drug Administration, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit held that a product (other than a combination product) that meets the definitions of both “drug” and “device” under the FDCA must be regulated as a device. On August 9, 2021, the FDA announced that, as part of its implementation of this court decision, the FDA intended to regulate products that meet both the device and drug definition as devices, except where Congress intended a different classification. The FDA further indicated that it intended to bring previously classified products into line with the court decision and would reexamine whether individual imaging agents meet the device definition, which raised uncertainty as to how our some of our products would be regulated. Congress subsequently resolved this issue when it passed the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023, which amended the FDCA by adding a provision that deemed any contrast agent or radioactive drug to be a drug.
Because our operations include the manufacture and distribution of medical radioisotopes and other medical products, we are subject to regulation by the NRC and the departments of health of each state in which we operate and the applicable state boards of pharmacy. In addition, the FDA is also involved in the regulation of cyclotron facilities where PET products are produced in compliance with cGMP requirements and U.S. Pharmacopeia requirements for PET drug compounding.
Drug laws also are in effect in many of the non-U.S. markets in which we or our partners conduct business. These laws range from comprehensive drug approval requirements to requests for product data or certifications. In addition, inspection of and controls over manufacturing, as well as monitoring of adverse events, are components of most of these regulatory systems. Most of our business is subject to varying degrees of governmental regulation in the countries in which we or our partners operate, and the general trend is toward increasingly stringent regulation. The exercise of broad regulatory powers by the FDA continues to result in increases in the amount of testing and documentation required for approval or clearance of new drugs and devices, all of which add to the expense of product introduction. Similar trends also are evident in major non-U.S. markets, including Canada, the European Union, Australia and Japan.
To assess and facilitate compliance with applicable FDA, NRC and other state, federal and foreign regulatory requirements, we regularly review our quality systems to assess their effectiveness and identify areas for improvement. As part of our quality review, we perform assessments of our suppliers of the raw materials that are incorporated into products and conduct quality management reviews designed to inform management of key issues that may affect the quality of our products. From time to time, we may determine that products we manufactured or marketed do not meet our specifications, published standards, such as those issued by the International Standards Organization, or regulatory requirements. When a quality or regulatory issue is identified, we investigate the issue and take appropriate corrective action, such as withdrawal of the product from the market, correction of the product at the customer location, notice to the customer of revised labeling and other actions.
Hatch-Waxman Act
The Hatch-Waxman Act added two pathways for FDA drug approval. First, the Hatch-Waxman Act permits the FDA to approve ANDAs for generic versions of drugs if the ANDA applicant demonstrates, among other things, that its product is bioequivalent to the innovator product and provides relevant chemistry, manufacturing and product data. See “Item 1. Business - Patents.” Second, the Hatch-Waxman Act created what is known as a Section 505(b)(2) NDA, which requires the same information as a full NDA (known as a Section 505(b)(1) NDA), including full reports of clinical and preclinical studies but allows some of the information from the reports required for marketing approval to come from studies which the applicant does not own or have a legal right of reference. A Section 505(b)(2) NDA permits a manufacturer to obtain marketing approval for a drug without needing to conduct or obtain a right of reference for all of the required studies. The Hatch-Waxman Act also provides for: (1) restoration of a portion of a product’s patent term that was lost during clinical development and application review by the FDA; and (2) statutory protection, known as exclusivity, against the FDA’s acceptance or approval of certain competitor applications.
PatentUnder U.S. law, patent term extension can compensate for time lost during product development and the regulatory review process by returning up to five years of patent life for a patent that covers a new product or its use. This period is generally one-half the time between the effective date of an IND and the submission date of an NDA, plus the time between the submission date of an NDA and the approval of that application. Patent term extensions, however, are subject to a maximum extension of five years, and the patent term extension cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years. The application for patent term extension is subject to approval by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in conjunction with the FDA.
The Hatch-Waxman Act also provides for a period of statutory protection for new drugs that receive NDA approval from the FDA. If the FDA approves a Section 505(b)(1) NDA for a new drug that is a new chemical entity, meaning that the FDA has not previously approved any other new drug containing the same active moiety, then the Hatch-Waxman Act prohibits the submission or approval of an ANDA or a Section 505(b)(2) NDA for a period of five years from the date of approval of the NDA, except that the FDA may accept an application for review after four years under certain circumstances.circumstances, specifically a patent challenge for one or more patents listed by the NDA holder in FDA’s publication, Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (the “Orange Book”), submitted in a “Paragraph IV” Certification. The Hatch-Waxman Act will not prevent the filing or approval of a full NDA, as opposed to an ANDA or Section 505(b)(2) NDA, for any drug, but the competitor would be required to conduct its own clinical trials, and any use of the drug for which marketing approval is sought could not violate another NDA holder’s patent claims. The Hatch-Waxman Act provides for a three-year period of exclusivity for an NDA for a new drug containing an active moiety that was previously approved by the FDA, but also includes new clinical data (other than bioavailability and bioequivalence studies) to support an innovation over the previously approvedpreviously-approved drug and those studies were conducted or sponsored by the applicant and were essential to approval of the application. This three-year exclusivity period does not prohibit the FDA from accepting an application from a third party for a drug with that same innovation, but it does prohibit the FDA from approving that application for the three-year period. The three-year exclusivity does not prohibit the FDA, with limited exceptions, from approving generic drugs containing the same active ingredient but without the new innovation.
Reimbursement
The successful commercialization of our products is also subject to the availability of appropriate third-party coding, coverage and payment for our customers. Third-party payors in the U.S. include private payors, including managed care providers, and State and Federal healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. The process for determining whether a payor will provide coverage for a product may be separate from the process for setting the price or reimbursement rate that the payor will pay for the product. Coverage of a product does not ensure there will be an appropriate reimbursement amount for such product and the process to ensure appropriate reimbursement is outside our control. For private payors, coverage and reimbursement of our products vary from private payor to private payor. Many private payors, such as managed care providers, manage access to products, and may use medical policies (which may include specific coverage requirements such as prior authorization, re-authorization and achieving performance metrics under value-based contracts) to control utilization. Exclusion from or restriction in coverage can reduce product use. For government payors, we participate, as required, in the Medicaid drug rebate program, the Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) and the Public Health Service Act 340B program, which each require discounts for participation and may be subject to change. For Medicare, reimbursement to customers for our products is generally established through the rulemaking process or in discussion with Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs). We have ongoing conversations with third-party payors to advocate for appropriate coding, coverage and payment for our portfolio of products.
Medicare Outpatient Pass-Through Payment Status
Part B of the Medicare program generally reimburses medical services and supplies, including drugs, provided to beneficiaries by physicians and other qualified healthcare professionals. Generally, drugs furnished “incident to” a physician’s service in the hospital outpatient setting of care are reimbursed at Average Sales Price (“ASP”) plus a certain additional percent, unless the product is treated as a “supply” in the performance of the procedure and “packaged” and paid as part of bundled payment for the procedure. Novel drugs, however, may apply for “pass-through status” in which case they are provided a separate payment at ASP plus a certain additional percent for two to three years, regardless of whether they would ordinarily be packaged.
PYLARIFY has received pass-through status effective January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2024, thereby providing separate reimbursement to customers using PYLARIFY in the hospital outpatient setting during this specified period. The reimbursement rate for PYLARIFY was initially based on the wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) plus three percent until ASP could be established. In 2022, CMS established an ASP for PYLARIFY and reimbursed at a rate equal to ASP plus an add-on percentage that varied throughout the year.
PYLARIFY has been assigned Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System code A9595 (piflufolastat F 18, diagnostic, 1 millicurie) for identification in claims and can be used by both public and private payors. Under existing Medicare policy for the hospital outpatient setting of care, non-pass-through diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals are not separately paid and are instead packaged into payment for the underlying procedure. Therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals are paid separately by Medicare OPPS regardless of pass-through status. We plan to continue our advocacy efforts with CMS and private insurers so that PYLARIFY customers will have appropriate and adequate reimbursement following the expiration of pass-through status. We are also supporting trade associations in their efforts to have Congress pass the Facilitating Innovative Nuclear Diagnostics (FIND) Act, which would allow for separate payment for certain diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals, including PYLARIFY, similar to the way Medicare OPPS currently pays for other drugs, biologics, and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals instead of under the current TPT structure of a separate payment that is limited to three years.
Healthcare Reform and Other Laws Affecting Payment
We operate in a highly-regulated industry. The U.S. and state governments continue to propose and pass legislation that may affect the availability and cost of healthcare. For example, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act or collectively,(collectively, the Healthcare“Healthcare Reform Act,Act”), substantially changes the way in which healthcare is financed by both governmental and private insurers and has a significant impact on the pharmaceutical industry. The Healthcare Reform Act contains a number of provisions that affect coverage, reimbursement and/or delivery of drug products and the medical imaging procedures in which our drug products are used. Key provisions that currently affect our business include the following:
•increasing the presumed utilization rate for imaging equipment costing $1$1.0 million or more in the physician office and free-standing imaging facility setting which reduces the Medicare per procedure medical imaging reimbursement; which rate was further increased by subsequent legislation effective January 1, 2014;
•increasing drug rebates paid to state Medicaid programs under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program for brand name prescription drugs and extending those rebates to Medicaid managed care organizations;
•expanding access to the 340B program by allowing additional covered entities to participate in the program; and
•imposing a non-deductible annual fee on pharmaceutical manufacturers or importers who sell brand name prescription drugs to specified federal government programs; and
amending the federal self-referral laws to require referring physicians ordering certain diagnostic imaging services to inform patients under certain circumstances that the patients may obtain the services from other local and unaffiliated suppliers (which may affect the setting in which a patient obtains services).programs.
The Healthcare Reform Act also amended the federal self-referral laws, requiring referring physicians to inform patients under certain circumstances that the patients may obtain services, including PET, CT, MRI computed tomography (“CT”), PET and certain other diagnostic imaging services, from a provider other than that physician, another physician in his or her group practice, or another individual under direct supervision of the physician or another physician in the group practice. The referring physician must provide each patient with a written list of other suppliers who furnish those services in the area in which the patient resides. These new requirements could have the effect of shifting where certain diagnostic medical imaging procedures are performed.
The Healthcare Reform Act has been subject to political and judicial challenges. For example, tax reform legislation was enacted atchallenges, but it has generally withstood such challenges, and the end of 2017 that effectively eliminated the “individual mandate” to maintain health insurance coverage by eliminating the tax penalty for individuals who do not maintain sufficient health insurance coverage beginning in 2019. In December 2018, a federal district court judge, in a challenge brought by a number of state attorneys general, found the Healthcare Reform Act unconstitutional in its entirety because once Congress repealed the “individual mandate” provision, there was no longer a basis to rely on Congressional taxing authority to support enactment of the law. In December 2019, a federal appeals court agreed that the individual mandate provision was unconstitutional, but remanded the case back to the district court to assess more carefully whether anymain provisions of the Healthcare Reform Act were severable and could survive. Pending action byremain in effect. More recently, Congress enacted the district court and resolutionInflation Reduction Act of any appeals,2022 (the “IRA”) which could take some time, the Healthcare Reform Act is still operational in all respects.
Recently, there has been considerable public and government scrutiny of pharmaceutical pricing and proposals to address the perceived high cost of pharmaceuticals. For example, in May 2018, President Trump and the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services released a “blueprint” to lower prescription drug prices and out-of-pocket costs. Certain proposals in the blueprint, and related drug pricing measures proposed since the blueprint, could cause significant operational and reimbursement changes forsignificantly impacts the pharmaceutical industry. As another example, in October 2018, CMS solicited public comments on potential changesAmong other provisions, the IRA authorizes Medicare to paymentnegotiate pricing for certainthe highest Medicare-spend drugs, as determined by their Medicare Part B and D spend, that have been on the market for an extended period of time without market competition. Although the IRA provides for a limited number of categorical exclusions from Medicare negotiation, radiopharmaceuticals are not among those categorical exclusions. CMS plans to begin implementing the first year of Medicare negotiation, which will be restricted to Part D drugs, including reducingstarting in calendar years 2026 and 2027. We are currently focused on drugs that are covered under Part B, therefore we do not expect the Medicare payment amount for selected MedicarePart D benefit redesign to have an impact on our portfolio. Part B drugs will be considered for Medicare negotiation beginning in calendar year 2028, and CMS will begin the process of identifying Part B drugs for negotiation as early as calendar year 2026. We are monitoring the implementation of the IRA to more closely align with international drug prices. As another example, legislation passeddetermine what impact, if any, this would have on our current products and product candidates in 2019 revised how certain prices reporteddevelopment.
The IRA also introduces rebate obligations for manufacturers of Part B and D drugs that take price increases which exceed the rate of inflation, similar to the longstanding Medicaid inflation rebates. Under these new Medicare inflation rebates, each Part B and D single-source drug/biological and biosimilar will have an “inflation adjusted” payment amount calculated by manufacturers underCMS. If the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program are calculated, a revision thatmanufacturer’s price increases for the Congressional Budget Office has estimatedrelevant product exceeds the inflation adjusted payment amount, as trended forward by the rate of inflation, the manufacturer will savebe required to reimburse Medicare the federal government approximately $3 billion indifference between what Medicare paid for the next ten years. Efforts by government officials or legislators to implement measures to regulate prices orproduct and what it would have paid based on the inflation adjusted payment for pharmaceutical products could limit our flexibility in establishing prices for our products or otherwise adversely affect our business if implemented. Changes could occur at the federal level or state level and may be adopted by statute, rule, or sub-regulatory policies. amount.
Recent state legislative efforts seek to address drug costs and generally have focused on increasing transparency around drug costs or limiting drug prices. Some of those efforts have been subject to legal challenge.
General legislative cost control measures may also affect reimbursement for our products or services provided with our products. The Budget Control Act, as amended by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2019, resulted in the imposition of 2% reductions in Medicare (but not Medicaid) payments to providers beginning in 2013 and will remain in effect through 2029fiscal year 2030 unless additional Congressional action is taken. The imposition of the 2% payment adjustment had been suspended through March 31, 2022 and went into effect as of April 1, 2022. Any significant spending reductions affecting Medicare, Medicaid or other publicly funded or subsidized health programs that may be implemented and/or any significant taxes or fees that may be imposed on us could have an adverse impact on our business results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Healthcare Fraud and Abuse Laws
We are subject to various federal, state and local laws targeting fraud and abuse in the healthcare industry, including anti-kickback and false claims laws. Patient assistance programs, if not properly implemented, can implicate these laws. Violations of fraud and abuse laws may be punishable by criminal or civil sanctions, including fines and civil monetary penalties, and/or exclusion from federal health care programs (including Medicare and Medicaid). Federal and state authorities are paying increased attention to enforcement of these laws within the pharmaceutical industry, and private individuals have been active in alleging violations of the laws and bringing suits on behalf of the government under the federal False Claims Act (“FCA”). Violations of international fraud and abuse laws could result in similar penalties, including exclusion from participation in health programs outside the U.S. If we were subject to allegations concerning, or were convicted of violating, these laws, our business could be harmed.
The federal Anti-Kickback Statute generally prohibits, among other things, a pharmaceutical manufacturer from directly or indirectly soliciting, offering, receiving, or paying any remuneration in cash or in kind where one purpose is either to induce the referral of an individual for, or the purchase or prescription of a particular drug that is payable by a federal health care program, including Medicare or Medicaid. The Healthcare Reform Act clarifies the intent requirements of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, providing that a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or a specific intent to violate the statute. Violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute can result in exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid or other governmental programs as well as civil and criminal fines and penalties of up to $102,522$104,330 per violation and three times the amount of the unlawful remuneration. In addition, the Healthcare Reform Act revised the FCA to provide that a claim arising from a violation of the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the FCA. The majority of states also have anti-kickback, false claims, and similar fraud and abuse laws and although the specific provisions of these laws vary, their scope is generally broad, and there may not be regulations, guidance or court decisions that apply the laws to particular industry practices. There is, therefore, a possibility that our practices might be challenged under the anti-kickback statutes or similar laws.
Federal and state false claims laws generally prohibit anyone from knowingly and willfully, among other activities, presenting, or causing to be presented for payment to third party payors (including Medicare and Medicaid) claims for drugs or services that are false or fraudulent (which may include claims for services not provided as claimed or claims for medically unnecessary services). As discussed, a claim arising from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the FCA. False or fraudulent claims for purposes of the FCA carry fines and civil penalties for violations ranging from $11,181$11,665 to $22,363$23,331 for each false claim, plus up to three times the amount of damages sustained by the federal government and, most critically, may provide the basis for exclusion from federally funded healthcare programs. There is also a criminal FCA statute by which individuals or entities that submit false claims can face criminal penalties. In addition, under the federal Civil Monetary Penalty Law, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General has the authority to exclude from participation in federal health care programs or to impose civil penalties against any person who, among other things, knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, certain false or otherwise improper claims. Our activities relating to the sale and marketing of our products may be subject to scrutiny under these laws.
Laws and regulations have also been enacted by the U.S. federal government and various states, as well as by countries outside of the U.S., to regulate the sales and marketing practices of certain entities including pharmaceutical and device manufacturers. The laws and regulations generally limit financial interactions between manufacturers and health care providers; require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the U.S. federal government; and/or require disclosure by pharmaceutical and device manufacturers to the government and/or public of financial interactions or other financial relationships with health care providers and other entities such as teaching hospitals (so-called “sunshine laws”). The Healthcare Reform Act requires manufacturers to submit information to the FDA on the identity and quantity of drug samples requested and distributed by a manufacturer during each year. Many of these laws and regulations contain ambiguous requirements or require administrative guidance for implementation. Given the lack of clarity inThe laws and regulations include requirements that can be unclear in their scope, nature, and required implementation our activitiesby regulated entities. If we fail to comply with such laws and regulations, we could be subject to the penalty provisions of the pertinent federalpenalties and stateadministrative actions under such laws and regulations.
Data Privacy, Security and SecurityBreach Notification
We are subject to data protection laws and regulations that addressset forth data privacy, security, and data security.breach notification requirements. The legislative and regulatory landscape for data protection continues to evolve, and in recent years there has been an increasing focus on data protection and other data privacy and data security issues. In the United States, numerous federal and state laws and regulations, including state data breach notification laws, state health information privacy laws and federal and state consumer protection laws govern the collection, use, disclosure and protection of health-related and other personal information. In addition to establishing restrictions on how personal information may be collected, used, and disclosed, these laws and regulations provide various rights to data subjects with respect to their personal information and establish requirements for how personal information must be secured. In addition, every state in the United States now has a data breach notification law that requires regulated entities to report certain security breaches to affected data subjects, regulators, or other entities. Failure to comply with data protection laws and regulations could result in government enforcement actions which(which could include civil or criminal penalties and requirements to take corrective
actions), private litigation (which may result in the award of damages against us), and/or adverse publicity, and could negatively affect our operating results, business, and business.reputation. In addition, we may obtain health information from third parties (e.g., healthcare providers who prescribe our products) that are themselves subject to privacy, security, and securitybreach notification requirements under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (collectively, “HIPAA”). While we believe that we are neither a “covered entity” nor “business associate” subject directly to regulation under HIPAA, HIPAA’s criminal provisions can apply to entities other than “covered entities” or “business associates” in certain
circumstances. Accordingly, we could be subject to criminal penalties if we knowingly obtain or disclose individually identifiable health information from a HIPAA-covered entity in a manner that is not authorized or permitted.
The collection and useIn addition, a growing number of jurisdictions outside of the United States have enacted robust data protection laws. Certain of these laws have extraterritorial application. For example, the processing of personal health data in the European Union is governed by the provisions of the General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, which came into effect on May 25, 2018. The GDPR applies to an entity established in May 2018.the EU and extraterritorially to an entity outside of the EU that offers goods or services to, or monitors the behavior of, individuals located in the EU. Certain “special categories” of personal data, including data concerning health, are subject to enhanced protections under the GDPR. This regulation imposes several requirements relating toon the consentcontrollers and processors of the individuals to whom the personal data, relates,including the information providedobligation to comply with various rights that individuals have with respect to their personal data and restrictions on the individuals, notificationprocessing of personal data, and to provide notice of data processing obligations to the competent national data protection authorities and the security and confidentiality of the personal data.authorities. The GDPR also imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data out of the European Union to the United States. Failure to comply with the requirements of the GDPR and the related national data protection laws of the European Union Member States may result in significant fines and other administrative penalties.
In the United States, several state legislatures are considering enacting new data privacy legislation. One example of such legislation that has already been passed is the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), which took effect on January 1, 2020 and imposedimposes many requirements on certain for-profit businesses that process the personal information of California residents. Many of the CCPA’s requirements are similar to those found in the GDPR, including requiring businesses to provide notice to data subjects regarding the information collected about them and how such information is used and shared, and providing data subjects various rights, such as the right to request access to suchtheir personal information and, in certain cases, request the erasure of such personal information. The CCPA also affords California residents the right to opt-out of “sales”the “sale” of their personal information. In addition, the CCPA requires regulated businesses to implement reasonable security procedures and practices to protect personal information. The CCPA contains significant penalties for companies that violate its requirements. It also provides California residents a private right of action, including the ability to seek statutory damages, in the event of a breach involving their personal information.information resulting from a business’s failure to implement and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices. Compliance with the CCPA is a rigorous and time-intensive process that may increase the cost of doing business or require companies to change their business practices to ensure full compliance.
On November 3, 2020, California passed the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”) through a ballot initiative. The CPRA amends the CCPA and expands its protections for personal information, including by establishing a new California Privacy Protection Agency to enforce the CPRA and by providing California consumers various rights such as the right to restrict the processing of their “sensitive personal information.” The CPRA’s amendments to the CCPA take effect on January 1, 2023, and generally will apply to personal information collected by regulated businesses on or after January 1, 2022. Antitrust and Competition Laws
The federal government and most states have enacted antitrust laws that prohibit specific types of anti-competitive conduct, including price fixing, wage fixing, concerted refusals to deal, price discrimination and tying arrangements, as well as monopolization and acquisitions of competitors that have, or may have, a substantial adverse effect on competition. Violations of federal or state antitrust laws can result in various sanctions, including criminal and civil penalties. We believe we are in compliance with such federal and state laws, but courts or regulatory authorities may reach a determination in the future that could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. In addition, we are subject to similar antitrust and anti-competition laws in foreign countries. We believe we are in compliance with such laws, however, any violation could create a substantial liability for us and also cause a loss of reputation in both foreign and domestic markets.
Laws Relating to Foreign Trade
We are subject to various federal and foreign laws that govern our international business practices with respect to payments to government officials. Those laws include the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) which prohibits U.S. companies and their representatives from paying, offering to pay, promising, or authorizing the payment of anything of value to any foreign government official, government staff member, political party, or political candidate for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business or to otherwise obtain favorable treatment or influence a person working in an official capacity. In many countries, the healthcare professionals we regularly interact with may meet the FCPA’s definition of a foreign government official. The FCPA also requires public companies to make and keep books and records that accurately and fairly reflect their transactions and to devise and maintain an adequate system of internal accounting controls.
Those laws also include the U.K. Bribery Act (“Bribery Act”) which proscribes giving and receiving bribes in the public and private sectors, bribing a foreign public official, and failing to have adequate procedures to prevent employees and other agents from giving bribes. U.S. companies that conduct business in the United Kingdom generally will be subject to the Bribery Act. Penalties under the Bribery Act include potentially unlimited fines for companies and criminal sanctions for corporate officers under certain circumstances.
Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws. Our operations reach many parts of the world that have experienced governmental corruption to some degree, and in certain circumstances strict compliance with anti-bribery laws may conflict with local customs and practices. Despite our training and compliance programs, our internal control policies and procedures may not always protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed by our employees or agents.
We are also subject to trade control regulations and trade sanctions laws that restrict the movement of certain goods, currency, products, materials, services and technology to, and certain operations in, various countries or with certain persons. Our ability to transfer people and products among certain countries may be subjected to these laws and regulations.
Health and Safety Laws
We are also subject to various federal, state and local laws, regulations and recommendations, both in the U.S. and abroad, relating to safe working conditions, laboratory and manufacturing practices and the use, transportation and disposal of hazardous or potentially hazardous substances.
See Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for information regarding certain risks related to regulatory matters.reimbursement and regulation.
Environmental Matters
We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, human health and safety in the U.S. and in other jurisdictions in which we operate. Our operations, like those of other medical product companies, involve the transport, use, handling, storage, exposure to and disposal of materials and wastes regulated under environmental laws, including hazardous and radioactive materials and wastes. If we violate these laws and regulations, we could be fined, criminally charged or otherwise sanctioned by regulators. We believe that our operations currently comply in all material respects with applicable environmental laws and regulations.
Certain environmental laws and regulations assess liability on current or previous owners or operators of real property for the cost of investigation, removal or remediation of hazardous materials or wastes at those formerly owned or operated properties or at third-partythird party properties at which they have disposed of hazardous materials or wastes. In addition to cleanup actions brought by governmental authorities, private parties could bring personal injury, property damage or other claims due to the presence of, or exposure to, hazardous materials or wastes. We currently are not party to any claims or any obligations to investigate or remediate any material contamination at any of our facilities.
We are required to maintain a number of environmental permits and nuclear licenses for our North Billerica, Massachusetts facility,campus, which isincludes our primary manufacturing, packaging and distribution facility. In particular, we must maintain a nuclear byproducts materials license issued by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This license requires that we provide financial assurance demonstrating our ability to cover the cost of decommissioning and decontaminating (“D&D”) the Billerica site at the end of its use as a nuclear facility. In addition, we have a radioactive production facility in San Juan, Puerto Rico,Somerset, NJ where we must also maintain a number of environmental permits and nuclear licenses. As of December 31, 2019, we currently estimate the D&D cost of both sites to be approximately $26.9 million. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, we have a liability recorded associated with the fair value of the asset retirement obligations of $12.9 million and $11.6 million, respectively. We currently provide this financial assurance in the form of surety bonds. We generally contract with third parties for the disposal of wastes generated by our operations. Prior to disposal, we store any low level radioactive waste at our facilities until the materials are below regulatory limits, as allowed by our licenses and permits. As of December 31, 2022, we currently estimate the D&D cost of all of our manufacturing sites (excluding our Puerto Rico radiopharmacy, which we sold on January 29, 2021) to be approximately $25.1 million. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, we have a liability of approximately $22.5 million and $20.8 million, respectively associated with our asset retirement obligations. We currently provide this financial assurance in the form of surety bonds.
We also actively monitor and seek to reduce our solid waste, energy and water usage, waste water discharge and greenhouse gas emissions. We generally contract with third parties for the disposal of wastes generated by our operations. In 2020, we developed a stormwater management operations and maintenance plan to minimize stormwater pollution from high impact activities. Improvements we made include (i) the regular inspection and cleaning of catch basins and piping to reduce sediment and debris wash out to adjacent wetlands; (ii) increasing street and parking lot cleaning to reduce pollutant run off; (iii) updating our snow removal plan at our North Billerica campus to reduce the impact to adjacent wetlands; and (iv) using salt brine as a pretreatment for winter storms to reduce the amount of salt use and run off.
With respect to sustainability, in 2020, we developed a mechanism to track and monitor our energy use, water use and waste generation. We use an Energy Star Portfolio Manager to track energy and water use that we believe will help us calculate associated greenhouse gas emissions and compare the performance of buildings on our North Billerica campus against a yearly baseline, national medians, and other similar buildings. We have expanded our tracking and monitoring of energy use, water use and waste generation to include our Somerset, NJ facility.
Environmental laws and regulations are complex, change frequently and have become more stringent over time. While we have budgeted for future capital and operating expenditures to maintain compliance with these laws and regulations, we cannot assure you that our costs of complying with current or future environmental protection, health and safety laws and regulations will not exceed our estimates or adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Further, we cannot assure you that we will not be subject to additional environmental claims for personal injury or cleanup in the future based on our past, present or future business activities. While it is not feasible to predict the future costs of ongoing environmental compliance, it is possible that there will be a need for future provisions for environmental costs that, in management’s opinion, are not likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, but could be material to the results of operations in any one accounting period.
See Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for information regarding certain risks associated with environmental matters.
EmployeesHuman Capital Management
As of December 31, 2019,2022, we had 508698 employees, of which 464672 were located in the U.S. and 4426 were located internationally. None of our employees are represented by a collective bargaining agreement, and we believe that our relationship with our employees is good.
Diversity, Inclusion, Ethics and Compliance
We believe that supporting our local community and instilling a diverse, inclusive, ethical and compliant culture makes us an employer of choice, allows us to maintain good standing with the regulatory authorities and our customers, and benefits our stockholders in the long run.
We have a female Chief Executive Officer, over half of our Vice Presidents and above are women, and approximately 50% of our employees are women. We continue to strive to improve our diversity and inclusion with a strategic emphasis beyond gender, and we require recruiters working with us to present diversity candidates. We also sponsor two Employee Resource Groups (“ERGs”), the Lantheus Diversity Connection ERG and the Women Leaders of Lantheus ERG.
We are committed to promoting a culture of ethics and compliance. Our Code of Conduct and Ethics reflects our commitment to corporate integrity and the underlying business practices and principles of behavior that support this commitment. Each year our employees complete mandatory training that includes anti-bribery/anti-corruption rules, insider trading prohibitions, confidentiality obligations, as well as specialized training in healthcare industry marketing practices. We have a formal Ethics and Compliance Committee that develops, implements and oversees our ethics and compliance programs. We also have a Supplier Code of Conduct, and we seek to do business with minority-owned, female-owned and other diverse businesses and organizations (including those owned or operated by veterans and disabled veterans) that appropriately reflect the communities in which we operate and the customer base we serve.
Compensation and Benefits
We seek to provide pay, benefits, and services that are competitive to market and create incentives to attract and retain employees. Our compensation package includes, among other things, market-competitive pay, cash bonuses, healthcare and defined contribution plan benefits, paid time off and family leave, and restricted stock and other equity grants to certain levels of employees. We are focused on pay equity and regularly assess pay among similar roles and responsibilities throughout our organization and in comparison to our peer group.
Communication and Engagement
We believe that our success depends on employees understanding how their work contributes to our overall strategy. To this end, we utilize a variety of channels to facilitate open and direct communication, including: (i) quarterly town hall meetings for our entire company; (ii) regular ongoing update communications; and (iii) an externally administered whistleblower hotline and website that is prominently advertised to our employees, and a whistleblower’s anonymity is protected, if so requested. We also established various employee recognition award programs to recognize and reward employees for specific outstanding accomplishments and to foster a positive employee relations climate.
Health, Wellness and Safety
We are committed to the health and safety of our employees, patients and other partners in the healthcare community. We work to promote an environment of awareness and shared responsibility for safety and regulatory compliance throughout the Company, in order to minimize risks of injury, exposure, or business impact.
During 2022, we developed “Workplace of the Future” guidelines that were designed to address how workplaces have changed coming out of the COVID-19 pandemic. The goal of the guidelines was to create a connected and engaged employee environment that balances the need for in-person interaction with the need to be flexible and collaborative across different locations and ways of working.
Corporate History
Founded in 1956 as New England Nuclear Corporation, our medical imaging diagnostic business was purchased by E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (“DuPont”) in 1981. Bristol Myers Squibb (“BMS”) subsequently acquired our diagnostic medical imaging business as part of its acquisition of DuPont Pharmaceuticals in 2001. In January 2008, Avista Capital Partners, L.P., Avista Capital Partners (Offshore), L.P. and ACP-Lantern Co-Invest, LLC (collectively “Avista”) formed Lantheus Holdings and acquired our medical imaging business from BMS. On June 30, 2015, we completed an initial public offering (“IPO”) of our common stock. We completed our acquisition of Progenics on June 19, 2020 (the “Progenics Acquisition”). Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “LNTH”.
Available Information
Our global Internet site is www.lantheus.com. We routinely make available important information, including copies of our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after those reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC, free of charge on our website at www.investor.lantheus.com.investor.lantheus.com. We recognize our website as a key channel of distribution to reach public investors and as a means of disclosing material non-public information to comply with our disclosure obligations under SEC Regulation FD. Information contained on our website shall not be deemed incorporated into, or to be part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and any website references are not intended to be made through active hyperlinks.
Our reports filed with, or furnished to, the SEC are also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov, and for Annual Reports on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, in an XBRL (ExtensibleInline Extensible Business Reporting Language)Language (“iXBRL”) format. XBRLiXBRL is an electronic coding language used to create interactive financial statement data over the Internet. The information on our website is neither part of nor incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the following risks. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we currently believe are not material, may also become important factors that adversely affect our business. These risks could materially affect our business, results of operations or financial condition, cause the trading price of our outstanding common stock to decline materially or cause our actual results to differ materially from those expected or those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and the risks of our businesses described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K.
Risks Related to Our CurrentPortfolio of Commercial Products
Our ability to continue to grow PYLARIFY as a commercial product is dependent on (A) the ability of PMFs to manufacture PYLARIFY to meet product demand, (B) our ability to sell PYLARIFY to customers, (C) our ability to obtain and Revenuesmaintain adequate coding, coverage and payment for PYLARIFY, (D) our ability to maintain PYLARIFY as the leading PSMA PET imaging agent in a competitive environment in which other PSMA PET imaging agents have been approved and additional ones are in development, and (E) our ability to obtain FDA approval for additional PMFs to manufacture PYLARIFY.
The commercial launch of PYLARIFY was complex. To manufacture PYLARIFY, we assembled and qualified a nationwide network of PMFs with radioisotope-producing cyclotrons that make F 18, which has a 110-minute half-life, so PYLARIFY is
manufactured and distributed rapidly to end-users. Because each of the PMFs manufacturing these products is deemed by the FDA to be a separate manufacturing site, each has to be separately approved by the FDA. Although PYLARIFY is broadly available across the U.S., we continue to seek qualification for additional PMFs in 2023 and can give no assurance that the FDA will continue to approve PMFs in accordance with our planned roll-out schedule. If FDA approval of manufacturing sites is delayed or withdrawn, our future business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be adversely affected.
PYLARIFY is sold in the U.S. to hospitals, independent imaging centers and government facilities and sales are generated through a PYLARIFY direct sales team as well as a sales team at some of our PMF partners. We generally do not use group purchasing arrangements to sell PYLARIFY and require each customer to enter into a contract directly with us or our PMFs. Our ability to continue to successfully grow PYLARIFY depends, in part, on our ability to continue to enter into arrangements directly with the hospitals, independent imaging centers and government facilities that we serve. Any delay or inability to enter into these arrangements could have an adverse impact on our future business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Obtaining adequate coding, coverage and payment for PYLARIFY is critical, including not only coverage from Medicare, Medicaid and other government payors, as well as private payors, but also appropriate payment levels to adequately cover our customers’ costs of using PYLARIFY in PET/CT imaging procedures. We received notification that our HCPCS code, which enables streamlined billing, went into effect as of January 1, 2022. In addition, effective January 1, 2022, CMS granted TPT Status for PYLARIFY, enabling traditional Medicare to provide an incremental payment for PET/CT scans performed with PYLARIFY in the hospital outpatient setting. TPT Status for PYLARIFY is expected to expire on December 31, 2024. After TPT Status expires, under current Medicare rules, PYLARIFY, similar to other diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals, would not be separately reimbursed in the hospital outpatient setting but rather would be bundled into the facility payment a hospital receives for a PET/CT imaging procedure, and the facility payment may not always adequately cover the total cost of the procedure. We can give no assurance that any CMS reimbursement in the hospital outpatient setting that follows the expiration of TPT Status will be adequate to cover the cost of a PYLARIFY PET/CT imaging procedure. In addition, if other government payors or private payors do not provide adequate reimbursement for the use of PYLARIFY, our future business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be adversely affected. We plan to continue our advocacy efforts with CMS and private insurers so that PYLARIFY customers will have appropriate and adequate reimbursement following the expiration of pass-through status and we are also supporting trade associations in their efforts to have Congress pass the Facilitating Innovative Nuclear Diagnostics (FIND) Act, which would allow for separate payment for certain diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals, including PYLARIFY, similar to the way Medicare OPPS currently pays for other drugs, biologics, and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals instead of under the current TPT structure of a separate payment that is limited to three years, however, we can give no assurances that we will be successful in those efforts.
The successful growth of PYLARIFY is also dependent on our ability to maintain PYLARIFY as the leading PSMA PET imaging agent in a competitive environment in which other PSMA PET imaging agents have been approved and additional ones are in development. PYLARIFY currently competes with two commercially available Ga-68-based PSMA PET imaging agents from Telix Pharmaceuticals Limited and Novartis AG, as well as other non-PSMA PET imaging agents. We also face potential competition from an F 18 PSMA PET imaging agent for which Bracco is currently seeking FDA approval, which we believe could be granted by the FDA in 2023. To the extent we lose market share to existing or future competitors (including during any period of time in which our TPT Status has expired but TPT Status for a later-approved competitive product still exists), such loss of market share could have an adverse impact on our future business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Moreover, because we are still early in the commercialization of PYLARIFY, we can give no assurance as to how clinical practice may evolve or our ultimate market penetration or market share.
Our success in growing PYLARIFY also depends, in part, on our successfully establishing the use of PYLARIFY for approved indications and potentially for additional indications, including for patient selection for PSMA-targeted therapeutics. For example, we believe the approval of PLUVICTO for the treatment of adult patients with PSMA-positive mCRPC who have already been treated with other anticancer treatments (androgen receptor pathway inhibition and taxane-based chemotherapy) created a new addressable market for the use of PSMA PET imaging in patient selection for PSMA-targeted therapy that increases the total addressable market in the U.S. by an additional 30,000 new scans per year for patients with mCRPC. However, the prescribing information for PLUVICTO specifies that a PSMA-11 based PSMA PET imaging agent be used for patient selection, and PYLARIFY is not a PSMA-11 based imaging agent. In March 2022, we announced a strategic collaboration with Novartis to include PYLARIFY in prostate cancer trials with PLUVICTO. While we note that FDA-approved labels for F 18 based and PSMA-11 based PSMA PET imaging agents have generally been treated as a class of drugs, including by the National Comprehensive Cancer Center in its guidelines and the Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging in its appropriate use criteria, we can give no assurances that the Novartis prostate cancer trials using PYLARIFY will be successful, that the PLUVICTO prescribing information will be expanded to incorporate F 18 based PSMA PET imaging agents like PYLARIFY, or how clinical practice may evolve. To the extent we are unsuccessful in establishing the use of PYLARIFY for approved or new indications, such lack of success could have an adverse impact on our future business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
In addition to the 30,000 new scans per year for patients with mCRPC, we believe the market potential for PSMA PET imaging agents in the U.S. could also include up to 125,000 scans for patients with intermediate, unfavorable or high/very high risk of suspected metastases of prostate cancer and 195,000 scans for patients with suspected recurrence of prostate cancer. However, we can give no assurance as to how clinical practice may continue to evolve or our ultimate market penetration.
The near-term growth of our business is substantiallyalso dependent on our ability to continue to grow the appropriate use of DEFINITY in suboptimal echocardiograms in the face of increased segment competition from other existing echocardiography agents and potential generic competitors as a result of future patent and regulatory exclusivity expirations.competitors.
The growth of our business is substantiallyalso dependent on our ability to continue to grow the appropriate use of DEFINITY in suboptimal echocardiograms. There were approximately 35.1 million echocardiograms in 2019 according to a third-party source. Assuming 20% of echocardiograms produce suboptimal images, as stated in the clinical literature, we estimate that approximately 7.0 million echocardiograms in 2019 produced suboptimal images. We estimate that DEFINITY held over 80% of the U.S. market for contrast agents in echocardiography procedures as of December 31, 2019. DEFINITY currently competes with Optison, aultrasound enhancing agents produced by GE Healthcare product, Lumason, aand Bracco product (known as SonoVue outside the U.S.Diagnostics, Inc. (“Bracco”), as well as echocardiography without contrastultrasound enhancing agents and other non-echocardiography agents.
We launched DEFINITY in 2001, and we continue to actively pursue additional patents in connection with DEFINITY and DEFINITY RT, both in the U.S. and internationally. In the U.S., for DEFINITY we have ansix Orange Book-listed method of use patent expiringpatents, one of which expires in March2035 and five of which expire in 2037, andas well as additional manufacturing patents that are not Orange Book-listed expiring in 2021, 2023 and 2037. In the U.S. for DEFINITY RT, we have eight Orange Book-listed patents, including two composition of matter patents that expire in 2035. Outside of the U.S., while our DEFINITY patent protection and regulatory exclusivity have generally expired, we are currently prosecutingpursuing additional DEFINITY and DEFINITY RT patents to try to obtain similar method of use and manufacturing patent protection as granted in the U.S. We were also recently grantedThe Orange Book-listed patents include a composition of matter patent on the modified formulationuse of DEFINITYVIALMIX RFID, which runs through December 2035. Ifexpires in 2037; additional VIALMIX RFID patent applications have been submitted in major markets throughout the modified formulation is approved by the FDA, then this patent would be eligible to be listed in the Orange Book.world.
Because our Orange Book-listed composition of matter patent expired in June 2019, we may face generic DEFINITY challengers in the near to intermediate term. Under the Hatch-Waxman Act, the FDA can approve ANDAs for generic versions of drugs before the expiration of an Orange Book-listed patent covering the innovator product if the ANDA applicant demonstrates, among other things, that (i) its generic candidate is the same as the innovator product by establishing bioequivalence and providing relevant chemistry, manufacturing and product data, and (ii) either the marketing of that generic candidate does not infringe anthe Orange Book-listed patentpatent(s) or the Orange Book-listed patentpatent(s) is invalid. With respectSimilarly, the FDA can approve a Section 505(b)(2) NDA from an applicant that relies on some of the information required for marketing approval to any Orange Book-listed patent coveringcome from studies which the applicant does not own or have a legal right of reference. The ANDA applicant or the Section 505(b)(2) applicant (if relying on studies related to the innovator product that expires afterproduct) (together, the ANDA applicant intends to begin commercialization, the ANDA applicant must certify that its generic candidate will not infringe the innovator’s Orange Book-listed patents or that the Orange Book-listed patents are invalid. The ANDA applicant“Applicant”) must also give Notice to the innovator, which would then enable the innovator to challengefile suit against the ANDA applicant in courtApplicant within 45 days of receiving suchthe Notice. If the innovator challenges the ANDA applicantApplicant in court in a timely manner, then FDA approval to commercialize the generic candidate will be stayed (that is, delayed) for up to 30 months while the dispute between the innovator and the ANDA applicantApplicant is resolved in court. The 30 month stay can be shortened if the patent infringement suit is resolved in the ANDA applicant’sApplicant’s favor before the 30 month stay expires, and this may involve a successful challenge of the patent’s validity in U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or USPTO,(“USPTO”) proceedings and appeals process.
our Orange Book-listed patent in court or in a USPTO adversarial proceeding.
As of the date of filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have not received any such Notice from any ANDA applicantApplicant, but we can give no assurance that we will not receive a Notice in the future. If we were to receive any such Notice in the future, we would review the Notice, evaluate the strength of any potential patent infringement claims, and be prepared to challenge the ANDA applicantApplicant in a timely fashion, which would thereby trigger the stay of up to 30 months. We can give no assurance that we would have grounds to file a patent infringement suit, that we would obtain the full 30 month stay, that we would be successful on the merits asserting that a generic candidatean Applicant infringes our Orange Book-listed patent, or that we would be successful defending the validity of our Orange Book-listed patent in court or in a USPTO adversarial proceeding.
As part of our microbubble franchise strategy, (i) we are developinghave developed and received FDA approval for DEFINITY RT, a modified formulation of DEFINITY, (ii) we look for other opportunities to expand our microbubble franchise, including new applications beyond echocardiography and contrastultrasound enhancing agent imaging generally such as our strategic arrangements with Cerevast, CarThera, Insightec, AHN and CarThera,SonoThera, and (iii) we continue to buildhave constructed a specialized in-house manufacturing capabilitiesfacility at our North Billerica facilitycampus for purposes of producing DEFINITY and, potentially, other sterile vial products. On February 22, 2022, we received FDA approval of our sNDA, authorizing commercial manufacturing of DEFINITY at our new facility. However, we can give no assurance that our microbubble franchise strategy will be successful or that the modified formulation, new applications or new manufacturing capabilities a new indication, a modified formulation or new applications will grow our microbubble franchise.
We have on-going development and technology transfer activities for our modified formulation with SBL located in South Korea but can give no assurances as to when or if those development and technology transfer activities will be completed and when we will begin to receive a supply
If we are not able to continue to (i) grow DEFINITY and DEFINITY RT sales, which depend on one or more of the growth of echocardiograms, the growth in the appropriate use of contrastultrasound enhancing agents in suboptimal echocardiograms, and our ability to sustain and grow our leading position in the U.S. echocardiography contrastultrasound enhancing agent market, or (ii) be successful with our microbubble franchise strategy, we may not be able to continue to grow the revenue and cash flow of our business, which could have a negative effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our dependence upon third parties for the manufacture and supply of a substantial portion of our products and certain key components and raw materials and upon our in-house manufacturing for DEFINITY could prevent us from delivering our products to our customers in the required quantities, within the required timeframes, or at all, which could result in order cancellations and decreased revenues.
We obtain a substantial portion of our products from third party manufacturers and suppliers.
PYLARIFY is manufactured by a nationwide network of PMFs with radioisotope-producing cyclotrons. The radioisotope in PYLARIFY is fluorine-18, which has a 110-minute half-life, so PYLARIFY is manufactured and distributed rapidly to end-users. Because each of the PMFs manufacturing PLYARIFY is deemed by the FDA to be a separate manufacturing site, each has to be separately approved by the FDA. Although we have qualified and continue to qualify additional PMFs, we can give no assurance that the FDA will continue to approve PMFs in accordance with our planned roll-out schedule or that the PMFs will not experience issues with their ability to manufacture and deliver PYLARIFY to our customers. If FDA approval of manufacturing sites is delayed or withdrawn or our PMF sites experience manufacturing issues, our future business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be adversely affected.
We rely on JHS as a substantial supplier of DEFINITY, as well as our sole source manufacturer of NEUROLITE, CARDIOLITE and evacuation vials. We rely on SBL as our sole source manufacturer of DEFINITY RT. We rely on various other sole source suppliers for some of our key components and raw materials.
Based on our current estimates, we believe that we will have sufficient supply of DEFINITY, NEUROLITE, CARDIOLITE and evacuation vials from JHS (together with DEFINITY from our in-house manufacturing facility), and sufficient supply of saline from our sole manufacturer, to meet expected demand. However, we can give no assurances that JHS or our other manufacturing partner will be able to manufacture and distribute our products in a high quality and timely manner and in sufficient quantities to allow us to avoid product stock-outs and shortfalls.
In addition to the products described above, for reasons of quality assurance or cost-effectiveness, we purchase certain components and raw materials from sole suppliers (including, for example, the specially designed chemistry synthesis boxes and consumables used in the manufacturing of PYLARIFY, the lipid blend material and perflutren gas used in the manufacturing of DEFINITY and the lead casing for our TechneLite generators). Because we do not control the actual production of many of the products we sell and many of the raw materials and components that make up the products we sell, we may be subject to delays caused by interruption in production based on events and conditions outside of our control.
If we or one of our manufacturing partners or suppliers experiences an event, including a supply chain disruption, shortage or delay, logistics issue, labor dispute, natural disaster, fire, power outage, machinery breakdown, security problem, failure to meet regulatory requirements, product quality issue, technology transfer issue, cybersecurity breach or other issue, we or one of our manufacturing partners or suppliers may be unable to manufacture the relevant products at previous levels or on the forecasted schedule, if at all. Due to the stringent regulations and requirements of the governing regulatory authorities regarding the manufacture of our products, we may not be able to quickly restart manufacturing at a third party or our own facility or establish additional or replacement sources for certain products, components or materials.
In addition to our existing manufacturing relationships, we are also pursuing new manufacturing relationships to establish and secure additional or alternative suppliers for our commercial products. We also constructed a specialized in-house manufacturing facility at our North Billerica, Massachusetts campus for purposes of producing DEFINITY and, potentially, other sterile vial products. On February 22, 2022, we received FDA approval of our sNDA, authorizing commercial manufacturing of DEFINITY at our new facility. This project should deliver supply chain redundancy for our current portfolio and the opportunity for margin expansion. However, we cannot assure you that these activities or any of our additional supply activities will be successful or that we will be able to avoid or mitigate interim supply shortages before new sources of product are fully functional and qualified. In addition, we cannot assure you that our existing manufacturers or suppliers or any new manufacturers or suppliers can adequately maintain either their financial health, technical capabilities or regulatory compliance to allow continued production and supply. A reduction or interruption in manufacturing, or an inability to secure alternative sources of raw materials or components, could eventually have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
The global supply of Mo-99 is fragile and not stable. Our dependence on a limited number of third party suppliers for Mo-99 could prevent us from delivering some of our products to our customers in the required quantities, within the required timeframe, or at all, which could result in order cancellations and decreased revenues.
A critical ingredient of TechneLite is Mo-99. We currently purchase finished Mo-99 from three of the four main processing sites in the world, namely IRE in Belgium, NTP in South Africa and ANSTO in Australia. These processing sites provide us Mo-99 from five of the six main Mo-99-producing reactors in the world, namely BR2 in Belgium, LVR-15 in the Czech Republic, HFR in The Netherlands, SAFARI in South Africa and OPAL in Australia.
TheOur agreement with NTP, processing facility had periodicacting for itself and on behalf of its subcontractor ANSTO, expires on December 31, 2024.
Although we have a globally diverse Mo-99 supply with IRE in Belgium, NTP in South Africa, and ANSTO in Australia, we still face supplier and logistical challenges in our Mo-99 supply chain. When one supplier experiences outages, in 2017, 2018 and 2019. When NTP was not producing, we reliedgenerally rely on Mo-99 supply from both IRE and ANSTOthe other suppliers to limit the impact of the NTP outages. In the second quarter of 2019, ANSTO experienced facility issues in its existing Mo-99 processing facility which resulted in a decrease in Mo-99 available to us. In addition, as ANSTO transitioned from its existing Mo-99 processing facility to its new Mo-99 processing facility in the second quarter of 2019, ANSTO experienced start-up and transition challenges, which also resulted in a decrease in Mo-99 available to us. Further, starting in late June 2019 and through the date of this filing, ANSTO’s new Mo-99 processing facility has experienced unscheduled production outages, andWe believe we are now relying on IRE and NTP to limit the impact of those ANSTO outages. Because ofeffectively manage these various supply chain constraints,challenges, but depending on reactor and processor schedules and operations, at times we have not been able to fill some or all of the demand for our TechneLite generators on certain manufacturing days, consequently decreasing revenue and cash flow from this product line during the outage periods as compared to prior periods.
ANSTO’s new Mo-99 processing facility, could eventually increase ANSTO’s production capacity from approximately 2,000 curies per week to 3,500 curies per week with additional committed financial and operational resources. At full ramp-up capacity, ANSTO’s new facility could provide incremental supply to our globally diversified Mo-99 supply chain and therefore mitigate some risk among our Mo-99 suppliers, although we can give no assurances to that effect, and adays. A prolonged disruption of service from one of our three Mo-99 processing sites or one of their main Mo-99-producing reactors could have a substantial negative effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We are also pursuing additional sources of Mo-99 from potential new producers around the world to furtherTo augment our current supply. In November 2014,supply of Mo-99, we entered into a strategic arrangement with SHINE for the future supply of Mo-99. Under the terms of the supply agreement, entered into in November 2014, SHINE will provide Mo-99 produced using its proprietary LEU-solution technology for use in our TechneLite generators once SHINE’s facility becomes operational and receives all necessary regulatory approvals, which SHINE now estimates will occur in 2022.2024. The term of this arrangement provides for three years of supply of Mo-99. However, we cannot assure you that SHINE or any other possible additional sources of Mo-99 will result inbe able to produce commercial quantities of Mo-99 for our business, or that these new suppliersSHINE, together with our current suppliers, will be able to deliver a sufficient quantity of Mo-99 to meet our needs.
U.S., Canadian and international governments have encouraged the development of a number of alternative Mo-99 production projects with existing reactors and technologies as well as new technologies. However, we cannot say when, or if, the Mo-99 produced from these projects will become available. As a result, there is a limited amount of Mo-99 available which could limit the quantity of TechneLite that we could manufacture, sell and distribute, resulting in a further substantial negative effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Most of the global suppliers of Mo-99 rely on Framatone-CERCA in France to fabricate uranium targets and in some cases fuel for research reactors from which Mo-99 is produced. Absent a new supplier, a supply disruption relating to uranium targets or fuel could have a substantial negative effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
In addition, because we sourceWe may not be able to successfully launch PYLARIFY AI as a commercial product.
We announced in November 2021 that PYLARIFY AI, our radioisotopes almost exclusively from international suppliers, potential global disruptions in air transport due to COVID-19 (coronavirus) could adversely affect our international supply chain for radioisotopes which, depending upon the magnitude and duration of such disruptions, could have a substantial negative effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
The instability of the global supply of Mo-99, including supply shortages, has resulted in increasesFDA-cleared medical device software, was commercially available in the costUnited States. Our ability to successfully launch PYLARIFY AI as a commercial product depends in part on, among other things:
•the market receptivity to PYLARIFY AI as a new digital application for quantitative assessment of Mo-99, which has negatively affected PSMA PET/CT images in prostate cancer;
•our margins,ability, and more restrictive agreementsour distributors’ abilities, to secure customers’ internal approvals and sell and deploy PYLARIFY AI at customer locations;
•interruptions or performance problems associated with suppliers, which couldour digital application, including a service outage; and
•a network or data security incident that allows unauthorized access to our network or data or our customers’ data.
Although we believe that PYLARIFY AI when used with PYLARIFY will provide us an important competitive advantage in a highly competitive PET PSMA diagnostic imaging agent market, we can give no assurances to that effect.
We rely on Bausch to develop and commercialize RELISTOR, exposing us to significant risks.
We rely on Bausch to pursue and complete further increase our costs.
Withdevelopment and obtain regulatory approvals for RELISTOR worldwide and to effectively commercialize the general instabilityproduct and manage pricing, sales and marketing practices and inventory levels in the global supplydistribution channel. The revenue derived from royalty and milestone payments from our RELISTOR collaboration with Bausch can fluctuate significantly from period to period, and our past revenue is therefore not necessarily indicative of Mo-99,our future revenue. We are and will be dependent upon Bausch and any other business partners with which we have faced substantial increases in the cost of Mo-99 in comparison to historical costs. We expect these cost increases to continuemay collaborate in the future as the Mo-99 suppliers move closer to a full cost recovery business model. The Organizationperform and fund development, including clinical testing of Economic CooperationRELISTOR, making related regulatory filings and Development (“OECD”) defines full cost recovery as the identificationmanufacturing and marketing products,
including for new indications and recovering these costsin new formulations, in their respective territories. Revenue from the market. While we are generally ablesale of RELISTOR depends entirely upon the efforts of Bausch and its sublicensees, which have significant discretion in determining the efforts and resources they apply to pass Mo-99 cost increases onsales of RELISTOR. Bausch may not be effective in obtaining approvals for new indications or formulations, marketing existing or future products or arranging for necessary sublicense or distribution relationships. Our business relationships with Bausch and other partners may not be scientifically, clinically or commercially successful. For example, Bausch has a variety of marketed products and its own corporate objectives, which may not be consistent with our best interests, and may change its strategic focus or pursue alternative technologies in a manner that results in reduced or delayed revenue to our customers in our customer contracts, if weus. Bausch may also have commercial and financial interests that are not ablefully aligned with ours in a given territory or territories, which may make it more difficult for us to do sofully realize the value of RELISTOR. We may have future disagreements with Bausch, which has significantly greater financial and managerial resources which it could draw upon in the future, our margins may decline further with respectevent of a dispute. Such disagreements could lead to our TechneLite generators, which couldlengthy and expensive litigation or other dispute-resolution proceedings as well as extensive financial and operational consequences to us and have a materialan adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial conditioncondition. In addition, independent actions may be taken by Bausch concerning product development, marketing strategies, manufacturing and cash flows.supply issues, and rights relating to intellectual property.
We are also dependent on Bausch for compliance with regulatory requirements as they apply to RELISTOR.
The RELISTOR commercialization program continues to be subject to risk.
Future developments in the commercialization of RELISTOR may result in Bausch taking independent actions concerning product development, marketing strategies or other matters, including termination of its efforts to develop and commercialize the drug.
Under our license agreement with Bausch, Bausch is responsible for obtaining supplies of RELISTOR, including contracting with contract manufacturing organizations (“CMOs”) for supply of RELISTOR active pharmaceutical ingredient and subcutaneous and oral finished drug product. These arrangements may not be on terms that are advantageous and will subject us to risks that the counterparties may not perform optimally in terms of quality or reliability.
Bausch’s ability to optimally commercialize either oral or subcutaneous RELISTOR in a given jurisdiction may be impacted by applicable labeling and other regulatory requirements. If clinical trials indicate, or regulatory bodies are concerned about, actual or possible serious problems with the safety or efficacy of RELISTOR, Bausch may stop or significantly slow further development or commercialization of RELISTOR. In such an event, we could be faced with either further developing and commercializing the drug on our own or with one or more substitute collaborators, either of which paths would subject us to the development, commercialization, collaboration and/or financing risks.
There has been growing public concern regarding the use of opioid drugs. Any efforts by the FDA or other governmental authorities to restrict or limit the use of opioids may negatively impact the market for RELISTOR. In addition, there is a substantial risk that the revenue targets for receiving additional RELISTOR milestone payments will not be met. As a result, there is no assurance that we will realize the potential revenue represented by future RELISTOR milestone payments.
Any such significant action adverse to the further development and commercialization of RELISTOR could have an adverse impact on our business.
Our dependence upon third partiesAZEDRA commercialization program is subject to significant risk.
Progenics received FDA approval for AZEDRA in July 2018. Since then, the manufactureAZEDRA commercial program has faced numerous challenges, including, among other things:
•decisions by treating physicians and patients to defer treatment and by hospital facilities to limit access for our representatives until COVID-19 infection rates subside;
•challenges in securing I-131 supply and manufacturing patient-ready doses of AZEDRA;
•a small Orphan Drug patient population;
•reluctance by some potential hospital customers to invest in the necessary facility build-out to accommodate the administration of a substantial portionhighly radioactive therapeutic agent (including, among other things, the construction of our products could prevent us from delivering our productslead-lined rooms to our customers in accommodate inpatients following AZEDRA’s administration); and
•the required quantities, withinhigh cost of the required timeframes, drug and reimbursement.
Because of these issues, we can give no assurance that AZEDRA will become a commercial success. After increased experience administering AZEDRA, clinicians may conclude that the complexity of administration and/or at all,safety concerns with using a highly radioactive therapeutic agent may not justify AZEDRA’s perceived clinical benefits. AZEDRA’s eligibility for new technology add-on payments (NTAP) under the Medicare Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) expired September 30, 2022. If post-
pass-through payment levels impact market acceptance for AZEDRA, the drug may not generate enough revenue to make it economically viable. In addition, the market may react negatively to the high cost of AZEDRA, which could result in order cancellationsnegative publicity and decreased revenues.potentially reputational harm to us. Further, to the extent new Federal restrictions relating to drug pricing are implemented and apply to AZEDRA, the additional pricing pressure could further limit AZEDRA’s economic viability.
We obtain a substantial portion of our products from third party manufacturers and suppliers. We rely on JHS as our sole source manufacturer of DEFINITY, Neurolite, Cardiolite and evacuation vials. We currently have additional on-going technology transfer activities for a modified formulation of DEFINITY with SBL. We currently believe that if approved by the FDA, the modified formulation could become commercially available in early 2021, although that timing cannotIf AZEDRA is determined to be assured. Currently, our DEFINITY, Neurolite, Cardiolite, evacuation vial and saline product supplieschallenging to administer, not economically viable or we are approved for manufacture by a single manufacturer.
Based on our current estimates, we believe that we will have sufficient supply of DEFINITY, Neurolite, Cardiolite and evacuation vials from JHS, and sufficient supply of saline from our sole manufacturer,unable to meet expected demand. However, we can give no assurances that JHS or our other manufacturing partner will be able to manufacture and distribute our products in a high quality and timely manner and in sufficient quantities to allow us to avoid product stock-outs and shortfalls. Currently, regulatory authorities in certain countries have not yet approved JHS as a manufacturer of certain of our products. Accordingly, until those regulatory approvals have been obtained,successfully commercialize it, our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows will continue tocould be adversely affected.
XenonWe may not be able to maintain Orphan Drug exclusivity for AZEDRA and, even if we do, that exclusivity may not prevent the FDA from approving competing products.
Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may designate a product as an Orphan Drug if it is captureda drug intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally defined as a by-productpatient population of fewer than 200,000 individuals annually in the United States, or a patient population greater than 200,000 in the United States where there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing the drug will be recovered from sales in the United States. AZEDRA currently has the Orphan Drug designation in the United States.
In the United States, Orphan Drug designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as opportunities for grant funding towards clinical trial costs, tax advantages and user-fee waivers. In addition, if a product that has Orphan Drug designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for the disease for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to Orphan Drug exclusivity, which means the FDA may not approve any other application to market the same drug for the same indication for a period of seven years, except in limited circumstances, such as a showing of clinical superiority over the product with orphan exclusivity or where the manufacturer is unable to assure sufficient product quantity.
We may not be able to maintain Orphan Drug exclusivity for AZEDRA. In addition, exclusive marketing rights in the United States may be limited if we seek approval for an indication broader than the orphan-designated indication or may be lost if the FDA later determines that the request for designation was materially defective or if we are unable to assure sufficient quantities of the Mo-99 production process. We receive bulk unprocessed Xenon from IRE resulting from HEU Mo-99 production, which we process and finishproduct to meet the needs of patients with the rare disease or condition. Even after an Orphan Drug is approved, the FDA can subsequently approve the same drug with the same active moiety for our customers. We do not yet receive Xenon resulting from LEU Mo-99 production at IRE and can give no assurances asthe same condition if the FDA concludes that the later drug is safer, more effective or makes a major contribution to the timingpatient care. A loss of the availabilityOrphan Drug exclusivity for AZEDRA may have an adverse impact on our ability to adequately commercialize AZEDRA.
Our just-in-time manufacturing of LEU Xenon. We believe we will have a sufficient supplyradiopharmaceutical products relies on the reliability of HEUour equipment and LEU Xenon to meet our customers’ needs. However, until IRE converts to LEU Xenon production or we can qualify an additional source of bulk unprocessed Xenon, we will rely on IRE as a sole source provider of HEU Xenon.
In addition to the products described above, for reasons of quality assurance or cost-effectiveness, we purchase certain components and raw materials from sole suppliers (including, for example, the lead casing for our TechneLite generatorsprocesses and the lipid blend material used in the processingtimely receipt of DEFINITY). Because we do not control the actual production of many of the products we sell and many of theradioactive raw materials and components that make up the products we sell, we may be subject to delays caused by interruption in production based on eventstimely shipment of finished goods, and conditions outsideany disruption of our control. supply or distribution networks could have a negative effect on our business.
At the facility on our North Billerica, Massachusetts facility,campus, we manufacture TechneLite on a highly automated production line, as well as Thallium and Gallium usingline. At the facility on our older cyclotron technology and Xenon and Quadramet using ourSomerset, New Jersey site, we manufacture AZEDRA on a hot cell infrastructure.line. As with all manufacturing facilities, equipment and infrastructure age and become subject to increasing maintenance and repair. If we or one of our manufacturing partners experiencesexperience an event, including a labor dispute, natural disaster, fire, power outage, machinery breakdown, security problem, failure to meet regulatory requirements, product quality issue, technology transfer issue or other issue, we may be unable to manufacture the relevant products at previous levels or on the forecasted schedule, if at all. Due to the stringent regulations and requirements of the governing regulatory authorities regarding the manufacture of our products, we may not be able to quickly restart manufacturing at a third party or our own facilityfacilities or establish additional or replacement sources for certain products, components or materials.
In addition, to our existing manufacturing relationships, we are also pursuing new manufacturing relationships to establish and secure additional or alternative suppliers for our commercial products. We currently have additional on-going technology transfer activities for a modified formulation of DEFINITY with SBL. We are also in the final stages of an extensive, multi-year effort to add specialized manufacturing capabilities at our North Billerica, Massachusetts facility. This project is part of a larger corporate growth strategy to create a competitive advantage in specialized manufacturing. This project should not only deliver efficiencies and supply chain redundancy for our current portfolio but also should afford us increased flexibility as we consider external opportunities. However, we cannot assure you that these activities or any of our additional supply activities will be successful or that we will be able to avoid or mitigate interim supply shortages before new sources of product are fully functional and qualified. In addition, we cannot assure you that our existing manufacturers or suppliers or any new manufacturers or suppliers can adequately maintain either their financial health, technical capabilities or regulatory compliance to allow continued production and supply. A reduction or interruption in manufacturing, or an inability to secure alternative sources of raw materials or components, could eventually have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Our just-in-time manufacturing of radiopharmaceutical products relies on the timely receipt of radioactive raw materials and the timely shipment of finished goods, and any disruption of our supply or distribution networks could have a negative effect on our business.
Becausebecause a number of our radiopharmaceutical products, including PYLARIFY, our TechneLite generators, and AZEDRA, rely on radioisotopes with limited half-lives, we or our partners must manufacture, finish and distribute these products on a just-in-time basis, because the underlying radioisotope is in a constant state of radio decay. For example, the radioisotope used in PYLARIFY is F 18, which has a 110 minute half-life, requiring that this product be manufactured and distributed within the same day to end-users. After being made on a cyclotron at a PMF, the F 18 is then combined with certain chemical ingredients in specially designed chemistry synthesis boxes to manufacture PYLARIFY. The finished PYLARIFY is then quality control tested and transferred to a radiopharmacist who prepares and dispenses patient-specific doses from the final product. Similarly, with respect to our TechneLite generators, if we receive Mo-99 in the morning of a manufacturing day for TechneLite generators, then we will generally ship finished generators to customers by the end of that same business day. Shipment of generators may be by next day delivery services or by either ground or air custom logistics. Any delay in us receiving radioisotopes from suppliers or being able to have finished products delivered to customers because of weather or other unforeseen transportation issues could have a negative effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
In the U.S., we are heavily dependent on a few large customers to generate a majority of our revenues for our single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) nuclear medical imaging products in our Precision Diagnostic product category. For PYLARIFY, we depend in part on some of our PMF partners to generate sales and collect revenue. Outside of the U.S., we rely primarily on distributors to generate a substantial portion of our revenue.
In the U.S., we have historically relied on a limited number of radiopharmacy customers, primarily Cardinal, RLS, UPPI, PharmaLogic and Jubilant Radiopharma, to purchase our nuclear imaging products in our Precision Diagnostic product category. Among the existing radiopharmacies in the U.S., continued consolidations, divestitures and reorganizations may have a negative effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Our contractual arrangements with these radiopharmacy customers generally specify pricing levels and requirements to purchase minimum percentages of certain products during certain periods. The agreements generally may be terminated upon the occurrence of specified events, including a material breach by the other party and certain force majeure events. If these contracts are terminated prior to the expiration of their term, or are not renewed, or are renewed on terms that are less favorable to us, then such an event could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
For PYLARIFY, we depend in part on some of our PMF partners to generate sales and collect revenue. To the extent our PMF partners are unsuccessful in generating sales or in collecting revenue, such an event could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We also continue to experience significant pricing pressures from our competitors, large customers and group purchasing organizations, and any significant, additional pricing pressures could lead to a reduction in revenue which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
In Canada, we maintain our own direct sales force to generate sales of DEFINITY. Outside of the U.S. and Canada, we have no sales force and, consequently, rely on third party distributors, either on a country-by-country basis or on a multi-country, regional basis, to market, sell and distribute our products. In certain circumstances, distributors may also sell competing products to our own or products for competing diagnostic modalities and may have incentives to shift sales towards those competing products. As a result, we cannot assure you that our international distributors will increase or maintain current levels of unit sales or that we will be able to increase or maintain our current unit pricing, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We face significant competition in our business and may not be able to compete effectively.
The markets for our products are highly competitive and continually evolving. Our principal competitors for our current commercial products and leading clinical development candidates include large, global companies that are more diversified than we are and that have substantial financial, manufacturing, sales and marketing, distribution and other resources:
•For PYLARIFY, our competitors currently include approved imaging agents from Telix Pharmaceuticals Limited and Novartis AG, and may in the future include an F 18 PSMA PET imaging agent that Bracco has in late stage clinical development, which we believe could be approved by the FDA for commercialization later in 2023. In addition, the University of California, San Francisco and the University of California, Los Angeles have approved NDAs for a Ga-68 PSMA-11 injection for PSMA PET imaging, which we believe will primarily be used within their hospital systems.
•For DEFINITY, our competitors currently include GE Healthcare and Bracco.
•For a number of our radiopharmaceutical commercial products, our competitors currently include Curium, GE Healthcare, Bracco and Jubilant Life Sciences, an affiliate of JHS and Jubilant Radiopharma, as well as other competitors, including NorthStar Medical Radioisotopes, LLC and potentially BWXT Medical Ltd.
•For RELISTOR, our principal competitors include RedHill Biopharma Inc., in collaboration with AstraZeneca PLC; Cubist Pharmaceuticals, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.; Mallinckrodt plc, in collaboration with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited; and BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc.; together with other prescription, as well as over-the-counter, laxatives used as first line therapy for OIC.
•For AZEDRA, there are currently no FDA approved anticancer treatments in the U.S. for malignant, recurrent, and/or unresectable pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma, our competitors include developers of anticancer treatments currently used, but not specifically FDA approved for treatment of malignant, recurrent, and/or unresectable pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.
•For PNT2002 and 1095, our principal competitors in the field of radiopharmaceutical therapeutics for mCRPC may include Novartis AG; Telix Pharmaceuticals Limited; Curium and Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., each of which have product candidates in development.
•For PNT2003, our principal competitor may include Novartis AG.
•For flurpiridaz, our principal competitors may include rubidium generators from Bracco and Jubilant Radiopharma.
We cannot anticipate the actions of our current or future competitors in the same or competing diagnostic modalities, such as significant price reductions on products that are comparable to our own, development of new products that are more cost-effective or have superior performance than our current products or the introduction of generic versions after our proprietary products lose their patent protection. In addition, distributors of our products could attempt to shift end-users to competing diagnostic modalities and products, or bundle the sale of a portfolio of products, in either case to the detriment of our specific products. Our current or future products could be rendered obsolete or uneconomical as a result of these activities.
Further, the radiopharmaceutical industry continues to evolve strategically, with several market participants either recently sold or for sale. In addition, the supply-demand dynamics of the industry are complex because of large market positions of some participants, legacy businesses, government subsidies (in particular, relating to the manufacture of radioisotopes), and group purchasing arrangements. We cannot predict what impact new owners and new operators may have on the strategic decision-making of our competitors, customers and suppliers, and such decision-making could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Ultrasound enhancing agents may cause side effects which could limit our ability to sell DEFINITY.
DEFINITY is an ultrasound enhancing agent based on perflutren lipid microspheres. In 2007, the FDA received reports of deaths and serious cardiopulmonary reactions following the administration of ultrasound enhancing agents used in echocardiography. Four of the 11 reported deaths were caused by cardiac arrest occurring either during or within 30 minutes following the administration of the ultrasound enhancing agent; most of the serious but non-fatal reactions also occurred in this time frame. As a result, in October 2007, the FDA requested that we and GE Healthcare, which distributes Optison, a competitor to DEFINITY, add a boxed warning to these products emphasizing the risk for serious cardiopulmonary reactions and that the use of these products was contraindicated in certain patients. In a strong reaction by the cardiology community to the FDA’s new position, a letter was sent to the FDA, signed by 161 doctors, stating that the benefit of these ultrasound enhancing agents outweighed the risks and urging that the boxed warning be removed. In May 2008, the FDA substantially modified the boxed warning. On May 2, 2011, the FDA held an advisory committee meeting to consider the status of ultrasound enhancing agents and the boxed warning. In October 2011, we received FDA approval of further modifications to the DEFINITY label, including: further relaxing the boxed warning; eliminating the sentence in the Indication and Use section “The safety and efficacy of DEFINITY with exercise stress or pharmacologic stress testing have not been established” (previously added in October 2007 in connection with the imposition of the box warning); and including summary data from the post-approval CaRES (Contrast echocardiography Registry for Safety Surveillance) safety registry and the post-approval pulmonary hypertension study. Further, in January 2017, the FDA approved an additional modification to the DEFINITY label, removing the contraindication statement related to use in patients with a known or suspected cardiac shunt. Bracco’s ultrasound enhancing agent, Lumason, has substantially similar safety labeling as DEFINITY and Optison. In April 2021, after reviewing certain adverse events that occurred in patients with a prior history of allergic reactions to polyethylene glycol (“PEG”), an inactive excipient in both DEFINITY and Lumason, the FDA and the marketing authorization holders of these products agreed to an additional contraindication for use of these products, including advising clinicians to assess patients for prior PEG hypersensitivity before administering these products. If additional safety issues arise (not only with DEFINITY but also potentially with Optison and Lumason), this may result in unfavorable changes in labeling or result in restrictions on the approval of our product, including removal of the product from the market. Lingering safety concerns about DEFINITY among some healthcare providers or future unanticipated side effects or safety concerns associated with DEFINITY could limit expanded use of DEFINITY and have a material adverse effect on the unit sales of this product and our financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Reimbursement and Regulation
Many of our customers are highly dependent on payments from third party payors, including government sponsored programs, particularly Medicare, in the U.S. and other countries in which we operate, and reductions in third party coverage and reimbursement rates for our products (or services provided with our products) could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
A substantial portion of our revenue depends on the extent to which the costs of our products purchased by our customers (or services provided with our products) are reimbursed by third party payors, including Medicare, Medicaid, other U.S. government sponsored programs, non-U.S. governmental payors and private payors. These third party payors exercise significant control over patient access and increasingly use their enhanced bargaining power to secure discounted rates and impose other requirements that may reduce demand for our products. Our customers’ ability to obtain adequate reimbursement for products and services from these third party payors affects the selection of products they purchase and the prices they are willing to pay. If Medicare and other third party payors do not provide adequate reimbursement for the costs of our products (or services provided using our products), deny the coverage of the products (or those services), or reduce current levels of reimbursement, healthcare professionals may not prescribe our products and providers and suppliers may not purchase our products.
In addition, demand for new products may be limited unless we obtain favorable reimbursement (including coding, coverage and payment) from governmental and private third party payors at the time of the product’s introduction, which will depend, in part, on our ability to demonstrate that a new agent has a positive impact on clinical outcomes. Third party payors continually review their coverage policies for existing and new products and procedures and can deny coverage for procedures that include the use of our products or revise payment policies such that payments do not adequately cover the cost of our products. Even if third party payors make coverage and reimbursement available, that reimbursement may not be adequate or these payors’ reimbursement policies may have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
For example, effective January 1, 2022, the CMS granted TPT Status in the hospital outpatient setting for PYLARIFY, enabling traditional Medicare to provide an incremental payment for PET/CT scans performed with PYLARIFY in that setting. TPT Status for PYLARIFY is expected to expire December 31, 2024. After TPT Status expires, under current Medicare rules, PYLARIFY, similar to other diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals, would not be separately reimbursed in the hospital outpatient setting but rather would be bundled into the facility payment a hospital receives for a PET/CT imaging procedure, and the facility payment may not always cover the total cost of the procedure. The Company can give no assurance that any CMS reimbursement in the hospital outpatient setting that follows the expiration of TPT Status will be adequate to cover a PYLARIFY PET/CT imaging procedure.
Over the past several years, Medicare has implemented numerous changes to payment policies for imaging procedures in both the hospital setting and non-hospital settings (which include physician offices and freestanding imaging facilities). Some of these changes have had a negative impact on utilization of imaging services. Examples of these changes include:
•Reducing payments for certain imaging procedures when performed together with other imaging procedures in the same family of procedures on the same patient on the same day in the physician office and free-standing imaging facility setting;
•Making significant revisions to the methodology for determining the practice expense component of the Medicare payment applicable to the physician office and free-standing imaging facility settings which results in a reduction in payment;
•Revising payment policies and reducing payment amounts for imaging procedures performed in the hospital outpatient settings; and
•Reducing prospective payment levels for applicable diagnosis-related groups in the hospital inpatient setting.
In the physician office and free-standing imaging facility setting, services provided using our products are reimbursed under the Medicare physician fee schedule. Payment rates under the Medicare physician fee schedule are regularly subject to updates to effectuate various policy goals of CMS and Congress. For example, in 2022, CMS reduced Medicare fee schedule payments rates in the agency’s final rulemaking, while a larger cut was put forth in the proposed rulemaking earlier that year. For 2023, CMS had finalized a reduction in the Medicare fee schedule payments rates, which was revised by Congress, pursuant to the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, to a lesser reduction. Additionally, since 2019, fee schedule payments have been adjusted for certain physicians based on their performance under a consolidated measurement system (that measures performance with respect to quality, resource utilization, meaningful use of certified electronic health records technology, and clinical practice improvement activities). From 2019 through payment year 2024, physicians may be eligible for a bonus based on the use of certain alternative payment models designated as “advanced” by CMS. The ongoing and future impact of these changes cannot be determined at this time.
We believe that Medicare changes to payment policies for imaging procedures applicable to non-hospital settings will continue to result in certain physician practices ceasing to provide these services and a further shifting of where certain medical imaging procedures are performed, from the physician office and free-standing imaging facility settings to the hospital outpatient setting. Changes applicable to Medicare payment in the hospital outpatient setting could also influence the decisions by hospital outpatient physicians to perform procedures that involve our products. Within the hospital outpatient setting, CMS payment policy is such that the use of many of our products are not separately payable by Medicare, although certain new drug products are eligible for separate (incremental) payment for the first three years after approval. Although Medicare generally does not provide separate payment to hospitals for the use of diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals administered in an outpatient setting, since 2013, CMS has had a policy to make a nominal additional payment ($10) to hospitals that utilize products with non-HEU, meaning the product is 95% derived from non-HEU sources. This payment policy continues in 2023. Although some of our TechneLite generators are manufactured using non-HEU, not all of our TechneLite generators currently meet CMS’s definition of non-HEU, and therefore this payment is not available for doses produced by the latter category of TechneLite generators used by our customers. Changes to the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system payment rates, including reductions implemented for certain hospital outpatient sites, could influence the decisions by hospital outpatient physicians to perform procedures that involve our products.
We also believe that all these changes and their resulting pressures may incrementally reduce the overall number of diagnostic medical imaging procedures performed. These changes overall could slow the acceptance and introduction of next-generation imaging equipment into the marketplace, which, in turn, could adversely impact the future market adoption of certain of our imaging agents already in the market or currently in development. We expect that there will continue to be proposals to reduce or limit Medicare and Medicaid payment for diagnostic services.
We also expect increased regulation and oversight of advanced diagnostic testing in which our products are used. Under section 218(b) of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act, beginning January 1, 2020, a professional who is ordering advanced diagnostic imaging services (which include MRI, CT, nuclear medicine (including PET) and other advanced diagnostic imaging services that the Secretary of HHS may specify, but not currently including echocardiography) must consult a qualified clinical decision support mechanism, as identified by HHS, to determine whether the ordered service adheres to specified appropriate use criteria (“AUC”) developed or endorsed by CMS-qualified “provider led entities”. Medicare claims for such services must include information indicating whether services ordered would adhere to specified applicable AUC. Denial of claims for failure to include AUC consultation information on the claim form was set to begin on January 1, 2022, but was not implemented by CMS. In the CY 2022 Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule, CMS delayed the start of these claims denials until the later of January 1, 2023, or the January 1st that follows the declared end of the Public Health Emergency for COVID–19. In 2022, CMS published on its website that it was unable to forecast when the payment penalty phase would begin, and CMS did not address the AUC delay in the CY 2023 Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule. To the extent that these types of changes have the effect of reducing the aggregate number of diagnostic medical imaging procedures performed in the U.S., our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows would be adversely affected.
Medicare coverage of PET radiopharmaceuticals has been the subject of a large number of National Coverage Determinations (“NCDs”) by CMS since 2000. Specific indications for PET imaging were covered, some through Coverage with Evidence Development. CMS’s longtime policy, however, was that a particular use of PET scans is not covered unless an NCD specifically provided that such use was covered. Effective March 7, 2013, CMS revised its policy through an NCD to allow local Medicare Administrative Contractors (“MACs”) to determine coverage within their respective jurisdictions for PET using radiopharmaceuticals for their FDA-approved labeled indications for oncologic imaging. Effective January 1, 2022, non-coverage in the absence of an NCD has also been removed for non-oncologic indications of PET radiopharmaceuticals, allowing MACs to determine coverage for these indications within their respective jurisdictions. To the extent that CMS or the MACs impose more restrictive coverage, our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows would be adversely affected.
Reforms to the U.S. healthcare system may adversely affect our business.
A significant portion of our patient volume is derived from U.S. government healthcare programs, principally Medicare, which are highly regulated and subject to frequent and substantial changes. The Healthcare Reform Act substantially changed the way healthcare is financed by both governmental and private insurers. The law contains a number of provisions that affect coverage and reimbursement of drug products and medical imaging procedures in which our drug products are used and/or that could potentially reduce the aggregate number of diagnostic medical imaging procedures performed in the U.S. Subsequently, the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 significantly revised the methodology for updating the Medicare physician fee schedule. And more recently, Congress enacted legislation in 2017 that effectively eliminated the Healthcare Reform Act’s “individual mandate” beginning in 2019. Congress continues to consider other healthcare reform legislation. There is no assurance that the Healthcare Reform Act, as currently enacted or as amended in the future, will not adversely affect our business and financial results, and we cannot predict how future federal or state legislative, judicial or administrative changes relating to healthcare reform will affect our business.
In addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted since the Healthcare Reform Act was enacted. The Budget Control Act of 2011 and subsequent Congressional actions includes provisions to reduce the federal deficit. These provisions have resulted in the imposition of 2% reductions in Medicare payments to providers, which went into effect on April 1, 2013 and will remain in effect through fiscal year 2030. The imposition of the 2% payment adjustment had been suspended through March 31, 2022 and went into effect as of April 1, 2022. Any significant spending reductions affecting Medicare, Medicaid or other publicly funded or subsidized health programs that may be implemented and/or any significant taxes or fees that may be imposed on us, as part of any broader deficit reduction effort or legislative replacement to the Budget Control Act, could have an adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Further, changes in payor mix and reimbursement by private third party payors may also affect our business. Rates paid by some private third party payors are based, in part, on established physician, clinic and hospital charges and are generally higher than Medicare payment rates. Reductions in the amount of reimbursement paid for diagnostic medical imaging procedures and changes in the mix of our patients between non-governmental payors and government sponsored healthcare programs and among different types of non-government payor sources, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
The full impact on our business of healthcare reforms and other new laws, or changes in existing laws, is uncertain. Nor is it clear whether additional legislative changes will be adopted or how those changes would affect our industry in general or our ability to successfully commercialize our products or develop new products.
Our business and industry are subject to complex and costly regulations. If government regulations are interpreted or enforced in a manner adverse to us or our business, we may be subject to enforcement actions, penalties, exclusion and other material limitations on our operations.
Both before and after the approval of our products and agents in development, we, our products, development agents, operations, facilities, suppliers, distributors, contract manufacturers, contract research organizations and contract testing laboratories are subject to extensive and, in certain circumstances, expanding regulation by federal, state and local government agencies in the U.S. as well as non-U.S. and transnational laws and regulations, with regulations differing from country to country, including, among other things, anti-trust and competition laws and regulations, and the General Data Protection Regulation in the European Union. In the U.S., the FDA regulates, among other things, the pre-clinical testing, clinical trials, manufacturing, safety, efficacy, potency, labeling, storage, record keeping, quality systems, advertising, promotion, sale, distribution, and import and export of drug products. We are required to register our business for permits and/or licenses with, and comply with the stringent requirements of the FDA, the NRC, the HHS, Health Canada, the EMA, the MHRA, the NMPA, state and provincial boards of pharmacy, state and provincial health departments and other federal, state and provincial agencies. Violation of any of these regulatory schemes, individually or collectively, could disrupt our business and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Under U.S. law, for example, we are required to report certain adverse events and production problems, if any, to the FDA. We also have similar adverse event and production reporting obligations outside of the U.S., including to the EMA and MHRA. Additionally, we must comply with requirements concerning advertising and promotion for our products, including the prohibition on the promotion of our products for indications that have not been approved by the FDA or a so-called “off-label use” or promotion that is inconsistent with the approved labeling. If the FDA determines that our promotional materials constitute unlawful promotion, it could request that we modify our promotional materials or subject us to regulatory or enforcement actions. Also, quality control and manufacturing procedures at our own facility and at third party suppliers must conform to cGMP regulations and other applicable law after approval, and the FDA periodically inspects manufacturing facilities to assess compliance with cGMPs and other applicable law, and, from time to time, makes those cGMPs more stringent. Accordingly, we and others with whom we work must expend time, money, and effort in all areas of regulatory compliance, including manufacturing, production and quality control. If in the future issues arise at a third party manufacturer, the FDA could take regulatory action which could limit or suspend the ability of that third party to manufacture our products or have any additional products approved at the relevant facility for manufacture until the issues are resolved and remediated. Such a limitation or suspension could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We are also subject to laws and regulations that govern financial and other arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturers and healthcare providers, including federal and state anti-kickback statutes, federal and state false claims laws and regulations, federal and state “sunshine” laws and regulations and other fraud and abuse laws and regulations.
We must offer discounted pricing or rebates on purchases of pharmaceutical products under various federal and state healthcare programs, such as the Medicaid drug rebate program, the “federal ceiling price” drug pricing program, the 340B drug pricing program and the Medicare Part D Program. We must also report specific prices to government agencies under healthcare programs, such as the Medicaid drug rebate program and Medicare Part B. Our Medicaid Drug Rebate agreements require us to report certain price information to the federal government. Determination of the rebate amount that we pay to state Medicaid programs for our products, of prices charged to government and certain private payors for our products, or of amounts paid for our products under government healthcare programs, depends upon information reported by us to the government. If we provide customers or government officials with inaccurate information about the products’ pricing or eligibility for coverage, or the products fail to satisfy coverage requirements, we could be terminated from the rebate program, be excluded from participation in government healthcare programs, or be subject to potential liability under the False Claims Act or other laws and regulations.
Failure to comply with other requirements and restrictions placed upon us or our third party manufacturers or suppliers by laws and regulations can result in fines, civil and criminal penalties, exclusion from federal healthcare programs and debarment. Possible consequences of those actions could include:
•Substantial modifications to our business practices and operations;
•Significantly reduced demand for our products (if products become ineligible for reimbursement under federal and state healthcare programs);
•A total or partial shutdown of production in one or more of the facilities where our products are produced while the alleged violation is being remediated;
•Delays in or the inability to obtain future pre-market clearances or approvals; and
•Withdrawals or suspensions of our current products from the market.
Our marketing and sales practices may contain risks that could result in significant liability, require us to change our business practices, and restrict our operations in the future.
We are subject to numerous domestic (federal, state and local) and foreign laws addressing fraud and abuse in the healthcare industry, including the FCA and federal Anti-Kickback Statute, self-referral laws, the FCPA, the Bribery Act, FDA promotional restrictions, the federal disclosure (sunshine) law and state marketing and disclosure (sunshine) laws. Violations of these laws are punishable by criminal or civil sanctions, including substantial fines, imprisonment and exclusion from participation in healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid as well as health programs outside the U.S., and even settlement of alleged violations can result in the imposition of corporate integrity agreements that could subject us to additional compliance and reporting requirements and impact our business practices. These laws and regulations are complex and subject to changing interpretation and application, which could restrict our sales or marketing practices. Even minor and inadvertent irregularities could potentially give rise to a charge that the law has been violated. Although we believe we maintain an appropriate compliance program, we cannot be certain that the program will adequately detect or prevent violations and/or the relevant regulatory authorities may disagree with our interpretation. Additionally, if there is a change in law, regulation or administrative or judicial interpretations, we may have to change one or more of our business practices to be in compliance with these laws. Required changes could be costly and time consuming.
If our operations are found to be in violation of these laws or any other government regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including, without limitation, civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, imprisonment, the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, or exclusion from state and federal healthcare programs including Medicare and Medicaid, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Risks Related to Our Business Operations and Financial Results
We may not be able to hire or retain the number of qualified personnel, particularly scientific, medical and sales personnel, required for our business, which would harm the development and sales of our products and limit our ability to grow.
Competition in our industry for highly skilled scientific, healthcare and sales personnel is intense. In connection with the launch and continued growth of PYLARIFY, we hired additional employees to assist us with the commercialization of PYLARIFY, including in sales, marketing, reimbursement, quality and medical affairs. Although we were successful in hiring and onboarding those employees and we have not had any material difficulty in the past in hiring or retaining qualified personnel, if we are unable to retain our existing personnel, or attract and train additional qualified personnel, either because of competition in our industry for these personnel, prolonged remote working conditions due to the COVID-19 pandemic, or insufficient financial resources, then our growth may be limited and it could have a material adverse effect on our business.
The COVID-19 pandemic had, and could continue to have, a material impact on our business, results of operation and financial condition, operating results, cash flows and prospects.
The global COVID-19 pandemic had, and could still have, a future negative impact on our business, particularly if there are additional resurgences as a result of new variants of the virus that further increase its communicability or its impact on certain populations, geographic regions and the healthcare system, including elective procedures and hospital access. In addition, our business has been impacted by hospital staffing challenges and a decline in the volume of certain procedures and treatments using our products.
In connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, the following risks could have a material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects:
•The delay or cancellation by hospitals and clinics of the procedures in which our products are used as a result of their COVID-19 response efforts and the duration of such effects, thereby reducing sales of our products for an unknown period of time;
•The inability or unwillingness of some patients to visit hospitals or clinics in order to undergo procedures in which our products are used, thereby reducing sales of our products for an unknown period of time;
•The inability of some patients to pay for procedures and/or the co-pay associated with those procedures in which our products are used due to job loss or lack of insurance, thereby reducing sales of our products for an unknown period of time;
•The inability of our distributors, radiopharmacy customers, PET manufacturing partners, hospitals, clinics and other customers to conduct their normal operations, including supplying or conducting procedures in which our products are used, because of their COVID-19 response efforts, or the reduced capacity or productivity of their employees and contractors as a result of possible illness, quarantine or other inability to work, thereby reducing sales of our products for an unknown period of time;
•The inability of global suppliers of raw materials or components used in the manufacture of our products, or contract manufacturers of our products, to supply and/or transport those raw materials, components and products to us in a timely and cost effective manner due to shutdowns, interruptions or delays, limiting and potentially precluding the production of our finished products, impacting our ability to supply customers, reducing our sales, increasing our costs of goods sold, and reducing our absorption of overhead;
•The reduced capacity or productivity of our complex, on-campus operations as a result of possible illness, quarantine or other inability of our employees and contractors to work, despite all of the preventative measures we continue to undertake to protect the health and safety of our workforce;
•The illiquidity or insolvency of our distributors or customers, or their inability to pay our invoices in full or in a timely manner, due to the reduction in their revenues caused by the cancellation or delay of procedures and other factors, which could potentially reduce our cash flow, reduce our liquidity and increase our bad debt reserves;
•A portion of our raw materials or finished product inventory may expire due to reduced demand for our drugs;
•Delays in our ability, and the ability of our contract research organizations and development partners to conduct, enroll and complete clinical development programs;
•Delays of regulatory reviews and approvals, including with respect to our product candidates and manufacturing facilities, by the FDA or other health or regulatory authorities;
•Decreased sales of those of our products that are promotionally sensitive, like DEFINITY and AZEDRA, due to the reduction of in-person sales and marketing activities and training caused by travel restrictions, quarantines, other similar social distancing measures and more restrictive hospital access policies;
•A reduction in revenue with continued incurrence of high fixed costs relating to our already-existing, complex and expensive radiopharmaceutical manufacturing facility could adversely affect our cash flows, liquidity and ability to comply with the financial covenants in our 2022 Facility;
•The increased reliance on our personnel working from home, which may negatively impact employee engagement, loyalty and productivity, or disrupt, delay or otherwise adversely impact our business, including through the increased employee resignations and retirements;
•The instability in worldwide economies, financial markets, social institutions, labor markets and the healthcare systems as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which could result in an economic downturn that could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as that of our suppliers, distributors, customers or other business partners; and
•A recurrence of the COVID-19 pandemic, or the development and spread of new strains of COVID-19 after social distancing and other similar measures have been relaxed.
The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts our business and our results of operations and financial condition will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information that may emerge in connection with the severity of the virus, the ability to treat and ultimately prevent it with vaccines, its potential recurrence or transformation into new or more contagious or virulent strains, and further actions that federal, state, local, or foreign governments may take to contain its impact.
If we lose the services of our key personnel, our business could be adversely affected.
Our success is substantially dependent upon the performance, contributions and expertise of our chief executive officer, executive leadership and senior management team. Mary Anne Heino, our Chief Executive Officer and President, and other members of our executive leadership and senior management team play a significant role in formulating and executing on our long-term strategy, generating business and overseeing operations. We have an employment agreement with Ms. Heino and a limited number of other individuals on our executive leadership team, although we cannot prevent them from terminating their employment with us. We do not maintain key person life insurance policies on any of our executive officers. While we have experienced some turnover on our executive leadership team, we have generally been able to fill positions by either promoting existing employees or attracting new, qualified individuals to lead key functional areas. Our inability to retain our existing executive leadership and senior management team, maintain an appropriate internal succession program or attract and retain additional qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our business depends on our ability to successfully introduce new products and adapt to a changing technology and medical practice landscape.
The healthcare industry is characterized by continuous technological development resulting in changing customer preferences and requirements. The success of new product development depends on many factors, including our ability to fund development of new agents or new indications for existing agents, anticipate and satisfy customer needs, obtain timely regulatory approval based on performance of our agents in development versus their clinical study comparators, develop and manufacture products in a cost-effective and timely manner, maintain advantageous positions with respect to intellectual property and differentiate our products from our competitors. To compete successfully in the marketplace, we must make substantial investments in new product development, whether internally or externally through licensing or acquisitions. Our failure to introduce new and innovative products in a timely manner would have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Even if we are able to develop, manufacture and obtain regulatory approvals for our new products, the success of these products would depend upon market acceptance and adequate coding, coverage and payment. Levels of market acceptance for our new products could be affected by a number of factors, including:
•The availability of alternative products from our competitors;
•The breadth of indications in which alternative products from our competitors can be marketed;
•The price of our products relative to those of our competitors;
•The timing of our market entry;
•Our ability to enter into commercial contracts to sell our products;
•Our ability to market and distribute our products effectively;
•Market acceptance of our products; and
•Our ability to obtain adequate coding, coverage and payment.
The field of diagnostic medical imaging is dynamic, with new products, including equipment, software and products, continually being developed and existing products continually being refined. Our own diagnostic imaging agents compete not only with other similarly administered imaging agents but also with imaging agents employed in different and often competing diagnostic modalities, and in the case of DEFINITY, echocardiography procedures without ultrasound enhancing agents. New hardware, software or agents in a given diagnostic modality may be developed that provide benefits superior to the then-dominant hardware, software and agents in that modality, resulting in commercial displacement of the agents. Similarly, changing perceptions about comparative efficacy and safety including, among other things, comparative radiation exposure, as well as changing availability of supply may favor one agent over another or one modality over another. In addition, new or revised appropriate use criteria developed by professional societies, to assist physicians and other health care providers in making appropriate imaging decisions for specific clinical conditions, can and have reduced the frequency of and demand for certain imaging modalities and imaging agents. To the extent there is technological obsolescence in any of our products that we manufacture, resulting in lower unit sales or decreased unit sales prices, we will have increased unit overhead allocable to the remaining market share, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Our future growth may depend on our ability to identify and acquire or in-license additional products, businesses or technologies, and if we do not successfully do so, or otherwise fail to integrate any new products, lines of business or technologies into our operations, we may have limited growth opportunities and it could result in significant impairment charges or other adverse financial consequences.
Even after giving effect to the POINT License Agreements (as defined below), we are continuing to seek to acquire or in-license products, businesses or technologies that we believe are a strategic fit with our business strategy. Future acquisitions or in-licenses, however, may entail numerous operational and financial risks, including:
•A reduction of our current financial resources;
•Incurrence of substantial debt or dilutive issuances of securities to pay for acquisitions;
•Difficulty or inability to secure financing to fund development activities for those acquired or in-licensed technologies;
•Higher than expected acquisition and integration costs;
•Disruption of our business, customer base and diversion of our management’s time and attention to develop acquired products or technologies; and
•Exposure to unknown liabilities.
We may not have sufficient resources to identify and execute the acquisition or in-licensing of third party products, businesses and technologies and integrate them into our current infrastructure. In particular, we may compete with larger pharmaceutical companies and other competitors in our efforts to establish new collaborations and in-licensing opportunities. These competitors likely will have access to greater financial resources than we do and may have greater expertise in identifying and evaluating new opportunities. Furthermore, there may be an overlap between our products or customers and the companies which we acquire that may create conflicts in relationships or other commitments detrimental to the integrated businesses. Additionally, the time between our expenditures to acquire or in-license new products, technologies or businesses and the subsequent generation of revenues from those acquired products, technologies or businesses (or the timing of revenue recognition related to licensing agreements and/or strategic collaborations) could cause fluctuations in our financial performance from period to period. Finally, if we devote resources to potential acquisitions or in-licensing opportunities that are never completed, or if we fail to realize the anticipated benefits of those efforts, we could incur significant impairment charges or other adverse financial consequences.
Challenges with product quality or product performance, including defects, caused by us or our suppliers could result in a decrease in customers and revenues, unexpected expenses and loss of market share.
The manufacture of our products is highly exacting and complex and must meet stringent quality requirements, due in part to strict regulatory requirements, including the FDA’s cGMPs. Problems may be identified or arise during manufacturing, quality review, packaging or shipment for a variety of reasons including equipment malfunction, failure to follow specific protocols and procedures, defective raw materials and environmental factors. Additionally, manufacturing flaws, component failures, design defects, off-label uses or inadequate disclosure of product-related information could result in an unsafe condition or the injury or death of a patient. Those events could lead to a recall of, or issuance of a safety alert relating to, our products. We also may undertake voluntarily to recall products or temporarily shut down production lines based on internal safety and quality monitoring and testing data.
Quality, regulatory and recall challenges could cause us to incur significant costs, including costs to replace products, lost revenue, damage to customer relationships, time and expense spent investigating the cause and costs of any possible settlements or judgments related thereto and potentially cause similar losses with respect to other products. These challenges could also divert the attention of our management and employees from operational, commercial or other business efforts. If we deliver products with defects, or if there is a perception that our products or the processes related to our products contain errors or defects, we could incur additional recall and product liability costs, and our credibility and the market acceptance and sales of our products could be materially adversely affected. Due to the strong name recognition of our brands, an adverse event involving one of our products could result in reduced market acceptance and demand for all products within that brand, and could harm our reputation and our ability to market our products in the future. In some circumstances, adverse events arising from or associated with the design, manufacture or marketing of our products could result in the suspension or delay of regulatory reviews of our applications for new product approvals. These challenges could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
In the U.S., we are heavily dependent on a few large customers and group purchasing organization arrangements to generate a majority of our revenues for our nuclear medical imaging products and our other products. Outside of the U.S., we rely primarily on distributors to generate a substantial portion of our revenue.
In the U.S., we have historically relied on a limited number of radiopharmacy customers, primarily GE Healthcare, Cardinal, UPPI, Jubilant Radiopharma and PharmaLogic, to distribute our current largest volume nuclear imaging products. Among the existing radiopharmacies in the U.S., continued consolidations, divestitures and reorganizations may have a negative effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. We generally have distribution arrangements with our major radiopharmacy customers pursuant to multi-year contracts, each of which is subject to renewal. If these contracts are terminated prior to expiration of their term, or are not renewed, or are renewed on terms that are less favorable to us, then such an event could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
For all of our medical imaging products, we continue to experience significant pricing pressures from our competitors, large customers and group purchasing organizations, and any significant, additional pricing pressures could lead to a reduction in revenue which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Outside of the U.S., Canada and Puerto Rico, we have no sales force and, consequently, rely on third-party distributors, either on a country-by-country basis or on a multi-country, regional basis, to market, sell and distribute our products. In Canada, we maintain our own direct sales force to sell DEFINITY. We formerly owned or operated radiopharmacies and we now sell radiopharmaceutical products under the Isologic Supply Agreement. In Australia, we also formerly owned or operated radiopharmacies, and we now sell DEFINITY and radiopharmaceutical products under the GMS Supply Agreement. In certain circumstances, distributors may also sell competing products to our own or products for competing diagnostic modalities and may have incentives to shift sales towards those competing products. As a result, we cannot assure you that our international distributors will increase or maintain current levels of unit sales or that we will be able to increase or maintain our current unit pricing, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We face significant competition in our business and may not be able to compete effectively.
The market for diagnostic medical imaging agents is highly competitive and continually evolving. Our principal competitors in existing diagnostic modalities include large, global companies with substantial financial, manufacturing, sales and marketing and logistics resources that are more diversified than ours, such as GE Healthcare, Bracco, Curium and Jubilant Life Sciences, as well as other competitors, including NorthStar Medical Radioisotopes. We cannot anticipate their actions in the same or competing diagnostic modalities, such as significant price reductions on products that are comparable to our own, development or introduction of new products that are more cost-effective or have superior performance than our current products, the introduction of generic versions when our proprietary products lose their patent protection or the new entry into a generic market in which we are already a participant. In addition, distributors of our products could attempt to shift end-users to competing diagnostic modalities and products. Our current or future products could be rendered obsolete or uneconomical as a result of these activities. Our failure to compete effectively could cause us to lose market share to our competitors and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Further, the radiopharmaceutical industry continues to evolve strategically, with several market participants either recently sold or for sale. In addition, the supply-demand dynamics of the industry are complex because of large market positions of some participants, legacy businesses, government subsidies (in particular, relating to the manufacture of radioisotopes), and group purchasing arrangements. We cannot predict what impact new owners and new operators may have on the strategic decision-making of our competitors, customers and suppliers, and such decision-making could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Risks Related to Reimbursement and Regulation
Certain of our customers are highly dependent on payments from third party payors, including government sponsored programs, particularly Medicare, in the U.S. and other countries in which we operate, and reductions in third party coverage and reimbursement rates for our products (or services provided with our products) could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
A substantial portion of our revenue depends, in part, on the extent to which the costs of our products purchased by our customers (or services provided with our products) are reimbursed by third party payors, including Medicare, Medicaid, other U.S. government sponsored programs, non-U.S. governmental payors and private payors. These third party payors exercise significant control over patient access and increasingly use their enhanced bargaining power to secure discounted rates and impose other requirements that may reduce demand for our products. Our potential customers’ ability to obtain adequate reimbursement for products and services from these third party payors affects the selection of products they purchase and the prices they are willing to pay. For example, certain radiopharmaceuticals, when used for non-invasive imaging of the perfusion of the heart for the diagnosis and management of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease, are currently subject to a Medicare National Coverage Determination (“NCD”). The NCD permits the coverage of such radiopharmaceuticals only when certain criteria are met. Our PET pipeline product flurpiridaz F 18, if approved, may become subject to this NCD, and may not be covered at all. If Medicare and other third party payors do not provide adequate reimbursement for the costs of our products (or services provided using our products), deny the coverage of the products (or those services), or reduce current levels of reimbursement, healthcare professionals may not prescribe our products and providers and suppliers may not purchase our products. In addition, demand for new products may be limited unless we obtain favorable reimbursement policies (including coverage, coding and payment) from governmental and private third party payors at the time of the product’s introduction, which will depend, in part, on our ability to demonstrate that a new agent has a positive impact on clinical outcomes. Third party payors continually review their coverage policies for existing and new products and procedures and can deny coverage for procedures that include the use of our products or revise payment policies such that payments do not adequately cover the cost of our products. Even if third party payors make coverage and reimbursement available, that reimbursement may not be adequate or these payors’ reimbursement policies may have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Over the past several years, Medicare has implemented numerous changes to payment policies for imaging procedures in both the hospital setting and non-hospital settings (which include physician offices and freestanding imaging facilities). Some of these changes have had a negative impact on utilization of imaging services. Examples of these changes include:
Limiting payments for imaging services in physician offices and free-standing imaging facility settings based upon rates paid to hospital outpatient departments;
Reducing payments for certain imaging procedures when performed together with other imaging procedures in the same family of procedures on the same patient on the same day in the physician office and free-standing imaging facility setting;
Making significant revisions to the methodology for determining the practice expense component of the Medicare payment applicable to the physician office and free-standing imaging facility setting which results in a reduction in payment;
Revising payment policies and reducing payment amounts for imaging procedures performed in the hospital outpatient setting; and
Reducing prospective payment levels for applicable diagnosis-related groups in the hospital inpatient setting.
In the physician office and free-standing imaging facility setting, services provided using our products are reimbursed under the Medicare physician fee schedule. Since 2015, payments under the Medicare physician fee schedule have been subject to specific annual updates: a 0.5% update through 2018; a 0.25% update in 2019; no updates from 2020 to 2025; and, beginning in 2026, differential updates based on whether the physician participates in advanced alternative payment models (with 0.75% updates for qualifying participants and 0.25% updates for non-qualifying participants) (which may be subject to budget neutrality adjustments). Since 2019, fee schedule payments have been adjusted for certain physicians based on their performance under a consolidated measurement system (that measures performance with respect to quality, resource utilization, meaningful use of certified electronic health records technology, and clinical practice improvement activities). From 2019 through payment year 2024, physicians may be eligible for a bonus based on the use of certain alternative payment models designated as “advanced” by CMS. The ongoing and future impact of these changes cannot be determined at this time.
We believe that Medicare changes to payment policies for imaging procedures applicable to non-hospital settings will continue to result in certain physician practices ceasing to provide these services and a further shifting of where certain medical imaging procedures are performed, from the physician office and free-standing imaging facility settings to the hospital outpatient setting. Changes applicable to Medicare payment in the hospital outpatient setting could also influence the decisions by hospital outpatient physicians to perform procedures that involve our products. Within the hospital outpatient setting, CMS payment policy is such that the use of many of our products are not separately payable by Medicare, although certain new drug products are eligible for separate (incremental) payment for the first three years after approval. Since 2013, although Medicare generally does not provide separate payment to hospitals for the use of diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals administered in an outpatient setting, CMS has had a policy to make a nominal additional payment ($10) to hospitals that utilize products with non-HEU, meaning the product is 95% derived from non-HEU sources. This payment policy continues in 2020. Although some of our TechneLite generators are manufactured using non-HEU, not all of our TechneLite generators currently meet CMS’s definition of non-HEU, and therefore this payment is not available for doses produced by the latter category of TechneLite generators used by our customers. Changes to the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system payment rates, including reductions implemented for certain hospital outpatient sites, could influence the decisions by hospital outpatient physicians to perform procedures that involve our products.
We also believe that all these changes and their resulting pressures may incrementally reduce the overall number of diagnostic medical imaging procedures performed. These changes overall could slow the acceptance and introduction of next-generation imaging equipment into the marketplace, which, in turn, could adversely impact the future market adoption of certain of our imaging agents already in the market or currently in development. We expect that there will continue to be proposals to reduce or limit Medicare and Medicaid payment for diagnostic services.
We also expect increased regulation and oversight of advanced diagnostic testing in which our products are used. Beginning January 1, 2020, a professional who is ordering advanced diagnostic imaging services (which include MRI, CT, nuclear medicine (including PET) and other advanced diagnostic imaging services that the Secretary of HHS may specify) must consult a qualified clinical decision support mechanism, as identified by HHS, to determine whether the ordered service adheres to specified appropriate use criteria (“AUC”). Reimbursement penalties will apply in 2021 if this requirement is not met (and documented on the claim). To the extent that these types of changes have the effect of reducing the aggregate number of diagnostic medical imaging procedures performed in the U.S., our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows would be adversely affected.
Reforms to the U.S. healthcare system may adversely affect our business.
A significant portion of our patient volume is derived from U.S. government healthcare programs, principally Medicare, which are highly regulated and subject to frequent and substantial changes. The Healthcare Reform Act substantially changed the way healthcare is financed by both governmental and private insurers. The law contains a number of provisions that affect coverage and reimbursement of drug products and medical imaging procedures in which our drug products are used and/or that could potentially reduce the aggregate number of diagnostic medical imaging procedures performed in the U.S. Subsequently, the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 significantly revised the methodology for updating the Medicare physician fee schedule. And more recently, Congress enacted legislation in 2017 that eliminated the Healthcare Reform Act’s “individual mandate” beginning in 2019 Congress continues to consider other healthcare reform legislation. There is no assurance that the Healthcare Reform Act, as currently enacted or as amended in the future, will not adversely affect our business and financial results, and we cannot predict how future federal or state legislative, judicial or administrative changes relating to healthcare reform will affect our business.
In addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted since the Healthcare Reform Act was enacted. The Budget Control Act of 2011 and subsequent Congressional actions includes provisions to reduce the federal deficit. These provisions have resulted in the imposition of 2% reductions in Medicare payments to providers, which went into effect on April 1, 2013 and will remain in effect through 2029. Any significant spending reductions affecting Medicare, Medicaid or other publicly funded or subsidized health programs that may be implemented and/or any significant taxes or fees that may be imposed on us, as part of any broader deficit reduction effort or legislative replacement to the Budget Control Act, could have an adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Further, changes in payor mix and reimbursement by private third party payors may also affect our business. Rates paid by some private third party payors are based, in part, on established physician, clinic and hospital charges and are generally higher than Medicare payment rates. Reductions in the amount of reimbursement paid for diagnostic medical imaging procedures and changes in the mix of our patients between non-governmental payors and government sponsored healthcare programs and among different types of non-government payor sources, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
The full impact on our business of healthcare reforms and other new laws, or changes in existing laws, is uncertain. Nor is it clear whether additional legislative changes will be adopted or how those changes would affect our industry in general or our ability to successfully commercialize our products or develop new products.
Our business and industry are subject to complex and costly regulations. If government regulations are interpreted or enforced in a manner adverse to us or our business, we may be subject to enforcement actions, penalties, exclusion and other material limitations on our operations.
Both before and after the approval of our products and agents in development, we, our products, development agents, operations, facilities, suppliers, distributors, contract manufacturers, contract research organizations and contract testing laboratories are subject to extensive and, in certain circumstances, expanding regulation by federal, state and local government agencies in the U.S. as well as non-U.S. and transnational laws and regulations, with regulations differing from country to country, including, among other things, anti-trust and competition laws and regulations and the recently enacted General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union (the “EU”). In the U.S., the FDA regulates, among other things, the pre-clinical testing, clinical trials, manufacturing, safety, efficacy, potency, labeling, storage, record keeping, quality systems, advertising, promotion, sale, distribution, and import and export of drug products. We are required to register our business for permits and/or licenses with, and comply with the stringent requirements of the FDA, the NRC, the HHS, Health Canada, the EMA, the MHRA, the CFDA, state and provincial boards of pharmacy, state and provincial health departments and other federal, state and provincial agencies.
Under U.S. law, for example, we are required to report certain adverse events and production problems, if any, to the FDA. We also have similar adverse event and production reporting obligations outside of the U.S., including to the EMA and MHRA. Additionally, we must comply with requirements concerning advertising and promotion for our products, including the prohibition on the promotion of our products for indications that have not been approved by the FDA or a so-called “off-label use” or promotion that is inconsistent with the approved labeling. If the FDA determines that our promotional materials constitute unlawful promotion, it could request that we modify our promotional materials or subject us to regulatory or enforcement actions. Also, quality control and manufacturing procedures at our own facility and at third party suppliers must conform to cGMP regulations and other applicable law after approval, and the FDA periodically inspects manufacturing facilities to assess compliance with cGMPs and other applicable law, and, from time to time, makes those cGMPs more stringent. Accordingly, we and others with whom we work must expend time, money, and effort in all areas of regulatory compliance, including manufacturing, production and quality control. If in the future issues arise at a third party manufacturer, the FDA could take regulatory action which could limit or suspend the ability of that third party to manufacture our products or have any additional products approved at the relevant facility for manufacture until the issues are resolved and remediated. Such a limitation or suspension could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We are also subject to laws and regulations that govern financial and other arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturers and healthcare providers, including federal and state anti-kickback statutes, federal and state false claims laws and regulations and other fraud and abuse laws and regulations.
We must offer discounted pricing or rebates on purchases of pharmaceutical products under various federal and state healthcare programs, such as the Medicaid drug rebate program, the “federal ceiling price” drug pricing program, the 340B drug pricing program and the Medicare Part D Program. We must also report specific prices to government agencies under healthcare programs, such as the Medicaid drug rebate program and Medicare Part B. As a specific example, in 2010, we entered into a Medicaid Drug Rebate Agreement with the federal government for some but not all of our products, and in 2016 entered into a separate Medicaid Drug Rebate Agreement for the balance of our products. These agreements require us to report certain price information to the federal government. Determination of the rebate amount that we pay to state Medicaid programs for our products, of prices charged to government and certain private payors for our products, or of amounts paid for our products under government healthcare programs, depends upon information reported by us to the government. If we provide customers or government officials with inaccurate information about the products’ pricing or eligibility for coverage, or the products fail to satisfy coverage requirements, we could be terminated from the rebate program, be excluded from participation in government healthcare programs, or be subject to potential liability under the False Claims Act or other laws and regulations.
Failure to comply with other requirements and restrictions placed upon us or our third party manufacturers or suppliers by laws and regulations can result in fines, civil and criminal penalties, exclusion from federal healthcare programs and debarment. Possible consequences of those actions could include:
Substantial modifications to our business practices and operations;
Significantly reduced demand for our products (if products become ineligible for reimbursement under federal and state healthcare programs);
A total or partial shutdown of production in one or more of the facilities where our products are produced while the alleged violation is being remediated;
Delays in or the inability to obtain future pre-market clearances or approvals; and
Withdrawals or suspensions of our current products from the market.
Regulations are subject to change as a result of legislative, administrative or judicial action, which may also increase our costs or reduce sales. Violation of any of these regulatory schemes, individually or collectively, could disrupt our business and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Our marketing and sales practices may contain risks that could result in significant liability, require us to change our business practices and restrict our operations in the future.
We are subject to numerous domestic (federal, state and local) and foreign laws addressing fraud and abuse in the healthcare industry, including the FCA and federal Anti-Kickback Statute, self-referral laws, the FCPA, the Bribery Act, FDA promotional restrictions, the federal disclosure (sunshine) law and state marketing and disclosure (sunshine) laws. Violations of these laws are punishable by criminal or civil sanctions, including substantial fines, imprisonment and exclusion from participation in healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid as well as health programs outside the U.S., and even settlement of alleged violations can result in the imposition of corporate integrity agreements that could subject us to additional compliance and reporting requirements and impact our business practices. These laws and regulations are complex and subject to changing interpretation and application, which could restrict our sales or marketing practices. Even minor and inadvertent irregularities could potentially give rise to a charge that the law has been violated. Although we believe we maintain an appropriate compliance program, we cannot be certain that the program will adequately detect or prevent violations and/or the relevant regulatory authorities may disagree with our interpretation. Additionally, if there is a change in law, regulation or administrative or judicial interpretations, we may have to change one or more of our business practices to be in compliance with these laws. Required changes could be costly and time consuming.
If our operations are found to be in violation of these laws or any other government regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including, without limitation, civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, imprisonment, the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, or exclusion from state and federal healthcare programs including Medicare and Medicaid, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We no longer qualify as an “emerging growth company” as of December 31, 2019, and as a result, we will have to comply with increased disclosure and compliance requirements.
Based on the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates which exceeded $700 million as of the last business day of June 2019, we no longer qualify as an “emerging growth company” but will instead be deemed to be a “large accelerated filer” as of December 31, 2019.
As a large accelerated filer, we will be subject to certain disclosure and compliance requirements that apply to other public companies but that did not previously apply to us due to our status as an emerging growth company. These requirements include, but are not limited to:
The requirement that our independent registered public accounting firm attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;
Compliance with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor's report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements;
The requirement that we provide full and more detailed disclosures regarding executive compensation; and
The requirement that we hold a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and obtain stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.
We expect that the loss of emerging growth company status and compliance with the additional requirements of being a large accelerated filer will increase our legal, accounting and financial compliance costs and costs associated with investor relations activities, and cause management and other personnel to divert attention from operational and other business matters to devote substantial time to public company reporting requirements. In addition, if we are not able to comply with changing requirements in a timely manner, the market price of our stock could decline and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the stock exchange on which our common stock is listed, the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which would require additional financial and management resources.
As of the end of fiscal 2019, we are required to implement additional procedures and practices related to internal control over financial reporting, and we may identify deficiencies that we may not be able to remediate in time to meet the necessary deadline.
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, our management is required to report upon the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Since we are deemed a large accelerated filer, our independent registered public accounting firm is required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal controls on an annual basis beginning with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019. The rules governing the standards that must be met for our management and independent
registered public accounting firm to assess our internal controls are complex and require significant documentation, testing and possible remediation of our existing controls and the incurrence of significant additional expenditures. In connection with our evaluation of our internal controls, we may need to upgrade systems, including information technology; implement additional financial and management controls, reporting systems, and procedures; and hire additional accounting and finance staff.
Any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. In addition, any testing by us or our independent registered public accounting firm conducted in connection with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may reveal deficiencies in our internal controls that are deemed to be material weaknesses or that may require prospective or retroactive changes to our financial statements or identify other areas for further attention or improvement. Internal control deficiencies could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock. Internal control deficiencies could also result in a restatement of our financial results in the future. We could become subject to stockholder or other third party litigation, as well as investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which could require additional financial and management resources and could result in fines, trading suspensions, payment of damages or other remedies. Further, any delay in compliance with the auditor attestation provisions of Section 404 could subject us to a variety of administrative sanctions, including ineligibility for short-form resale registration, action by the SEC and the suspension or delisting of our common stock, which could reduce the trading price of our common stock and could harm our business.
Risks Related to Safety
Ultrasound contrast agents may cause side effects which could limit our ability to sell DEFINITY.
DEFINITY is an ultrasound contrast agent based on perflutren lipid microspheres. In 2007, the FDA received reports of deaths and serious cardiopulmonary reactions following the administration of ultrasound micro-bubble contrast agents used in echocardiography. Four of the 11 reported deaths were caused by cardiac arrest occurring either during or within 30 minutes following the administration of the contrast agent; most of the serious but non-fatal reactions also occurred in this time frame. As a result, in October 2007, the FDA requested that we and GE Healthcare, which distributes Optison, a competitor to DEFINITY, add a boxed warning to these products emphasizing the risk for serious cardiopulmonary reactions and that the use of these products was contraindicated in certain patients. In a strong reaction by the cardiology community to the FDA’s new position, a letter was sent to the FDA, signed by 161 doctors, stating that the benefit of these ultrasound contrast agents outweighed the risks and urging that the boxed warning be removed. In May 2008, the FDA substantially modified the boxed warning. On May 2, 2011, the FDA held an advisory committee meeting to consider the status of ultrasound micro-bubble contrast agents and the boxed warning. In October 2011, we received FDA approval of further modifications to the DEFINITY label, including: further relaxing the boxed warning; eliminating the sentence in the Indication and Use section “The safety and efficacy of DEFINITY with exercise stress or pharmacologic stress testing have not been established” (previously added in October 2007 in connection with the imposition of the box warning); and including summary data from the post-approval CaRES (Contrast echocardiography Registry for Safety Surveillance) safety registry and the post-approval pulmonary hypertension study. Further, in January 2017, the FDA approved an additional modification to the DEFINITY label, removing the contraindication statement related to use in patients with a known or suspected cardiac shunt. Bracco’s ultrasound contrast agent, Lumason, has substantially similar safety labeling as DEFINITY and Optison. If additional safety issues arise (not only with DEFINITY but also potentially with Optison and Lumason), this may result in unfavorable changes in labeling or result in restrictions on the approval of our product, including removal of the product from the market. Lingering safety concerns about DEFINITY among some healthcare providers or future unanticipated side effects or safety concerns associated with DEFINITY could limit expanded use of DEFINITY and have a material adverse effect on the unit sales of this product and our financial condition and results of operations.
A heightened public or regulatory focus on the radiation risks of diagnostic imaging could have an adverse effect on our business.
We believe that there has been heightened public and regulatory focus on radiation exposure, including the concern that repeated doses of radiation used in diagnostic imaging procedures pose the potential risk of long-term cell damage, cancer and other diseases. For example, starting in January 2012, CMS required the accreditation of facilities providing the technical component of advanced imaging services, including CT, MRI, PET and nuclear medicine, in non-hospital freestanding settings. In August 2011, The Joint Commission (an independent, not-for-profit organization that accredits and certifies more than 20,500 healthcare organizations and programs in the U.S.) issued an alert on the radiation risks of diagnostic imaging and recommended specific actions for providing “the right test and the right dose through effective processes, safe technology and a culture of safety.” The Joint Commission has revised accreditation standards for diagnostic imaging in recent years, including standards related to dose optimization.
Heightened regulatory focus on risks caused by the radiation exposure received by diagnostic imaging patients could lead to increased regulation of radiopharmaceutical manufacturers or healthcare providers who perform procedures that use our imaging agents, which could make the procedures more costly, reduce the number of providers who perform procedures and/or decrease the demand for our products. In addition, heightened public focus on or fear of radiation exposure could lead to decreased demand for our products by patients or by healthcare providers who order the procedures in which our agents are used. Although we believe that our diagnostic imaging agents when properly used do not expose patients and healthcare providers to unsafe levels of radiation, any of the foregoing risks could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
In the ordinary course of business, we may be subject to product liability claims and lawsuits, including potential class actions, alleging that our products have resulted or could result in an unsafe condition or injury.
Any product liability claim brought against us, with or without merit, could be time consuming and costly to defend and could result in an increase of our insurance premiums. Although we have not had any such claims to date, claims that could be brought against us might not be covered by our insurance policies. Furthermore, although we currently have product liability insurance coverage with policy limits that we believe are customary for pharmaceutical companies in the diagnostic medical imaging industry and adequate to provide us with insurance coverage for foreseeable risks, even where the claim is covered by our insurance, our insurance coverage might be inadequate and we would have to pay the amount of any settlement or judgment that is in excess of our policy limits. We may not be able to obtain insurance on terms acceptable to us or at all, since insurance varies in cost and can be difficult to obtain. Our failure to maintain adequate insurance coverage or successfully defend against product liability claims could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We use hazardous materials in our business and must comply with environmental laws and regulations, which can be expensive.
Our operations use hazardous materials and produce hazardous wastes, including radioactive, chemical and, in certain circumstances, biological materials and wastes. We are subject to a variety of federal, state and local laws and regulations as well as non-U.S. laws and regulations relating to the transport, use, handling, storage, exposure to and disposal of these materials and wastes. Environmental laws and regulations are complex, change frequently and have generally become more stringent over time. We are required to obtain, maintain and renew various environmental permits and nuclear licenses. Although we believe that our safety procedures for transporting, using, handling, storing and disposing of, and limiting exposure to, these materials and wastes comply in all material respects with the standards prescribed by applicable laws and regulations, the risk of accidental contamination or injury cannot be eliminated. We place a high priority on these safety procedures and seek to limit any inherent risks. We generally contract with third parties for the disposal of wastes generated by our operations. Prior to disposal, weWe store any low level radioactive waste at our facilitiesfacility and dispose of the materials in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. A majority of our low level radioactive waste is held to
decay until the materials are no longer considered radioactive. Although we believe we have complied in all material respects with all applicable environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, we cannot assure you that we have been or will be in compliance with all such laws at all times. If we violate these laws, we could be fined, criminally charged or otherwise sanctioned by regulators. We may be required to incur further costs to comply with current or future environmental and safety laws and regulations. In addition, in the event of accidental contamination or injury from these materials, we could be held liable for any damages that result and any such liability could exceed our resources.
We leasepreviously leased a small portion of our North Billerica, Massachusetts facilitycampus to PerkinElmer for the manufacturing, finishing and packaging of certain radioisotopes, including Strontium-90, which has physical characteristics that make it more challenging to work with and dispose of than our own commercial radioisotopes, including a much longer half-life. PerkinElmer decommissioned its space and vacated the premises as of December 30, 2021. We are fully indemnified by PerkinElmer under our lease for any property damage or personal injury resulting from their activities in our facility. If any release or excursion of radioactive materials took place from their leased space that resulted in property damage or personal injury, the indemnification obligations were not honored, and we were forced to cover any related remediation, clean-up or other expenses, depending on the magnitude, the cost of such remediation, clean-up or other expenses could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
While we have budgeted for current and future capital and operating expenditures to maintain compliance with these laws and regulations, we cannot assure you that our costs of complying with current or future environmental, health and safety laws and regulations will not exceed our estimates or adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Further, we cannot assure you that we will not be subject to additional environmental claims for personal injury, investigation or cleanup in the future based on our past, present or future business activities.
Risks Related to Our Business
Our business depends on our ability to successfully introduce new products and adapt to a changing technology and medical practice landscape.
The healthcare industry is characterized by continuous technological development resulting in changing customer preferences and requirements. The success of new product development depends on many factors, including our ability to fund development of new agents or new indications for existing agents, anticipate and satisfy customer needs, obtain regulatory approval on a timely basis based on performance of our agents in development versus their clinical study comparators, develop and manufacture products in a cost-effective and timely manner, maintain advantageous positions with respect to intellectual property and differentiate our products from our competitors. To compete successfully in the marketplace, we must make substantial investments in new product development, whether internally or externally through licensing or acquisitions. Our failure to introduce new and innovative products in a timely manner would have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Even if we are able to develop, manufacture and obtain regulatory approvals for our new products, the success of these products would depend upon market acceptance and adequate reimbursement. Levels of market acceptance for our new products could be affected by a number of factors, including:
The availability of alternative products from our competitors;
The breadth of indications in which alternative products from our competitors can be marketed;
The price of our products relative to those of our competitors;
The timing of our market entry;
Our ability to market and distribute our products effectively;
Market acceptance of our products; and
Our ability to obtain adequate reimbursement.
The field of diagnostic medical imaging is dynamic, with new products, including hardware, software and agents, continually being developed and existing products continually being refined. Our own diagnostic imaging agents compete not only with other similarly administered imaging agents but also with imaging agents employed in different and often competing diagnostic modalities, and in the case of DEFINITY, echocardiography procedures without contrast. New hardware, software or agents in a given diagnostic modality may be developed that provide benefits superior to the then-dominant hardware, software and agents in that modality, resulting in commercial displacement of the agents. Similarly, changing perceptions about comparative efficacy and safety including, among other things, comparative radiation exposure, as well as changing availability of supply may favor one agent over another or one modality over another. In addition, new or revised appropriate use criteria developed by professional societies, to assist physicians and other health care providers in making appropriate imaging decisions for specific clinical conditions, can and have reduced the frequency of and demand for certain imaging modalities and imaging agents. To the extent there is technological obsolescence in any of our products that we manufacture, resulting in lower unit sales or decreased unit sales prices, we will have increased unit overhead allocable to the remaining market share, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
The process of developing new drugs and obtaining regulatory approval is complex, time-consuming and costly, and the outcome is not certain.
We currently have three active clinical development programs in the U.S. - flurpiridaz F 18, LMI 1195 and DEFINITY for LVEF. To obtain regulatory approval for these agents in the indications being pursued, we must conduct extensive human tests, which are referred to as clinical trials, as well as meet other rigorous regulatory requirements, as further described in Part I, Item 1. “Business—Regulatory Matters.” Satisfaction of all regulatory requirements typically takes many years and requires the expenditure of substantial resources. A number of other factors may cause significant delays in the completion of our clinical trials, including unexpected delays in the initiation of clinical sites, slower than projected enrollment, competition with ongoing clinical trials and scheduling conflicts with participating clinicians, regulatory requirements, limits on manufacturing capacity and failure of an agent to meet required standards for administration to humans. In addition, it may take longer than we project to achieve study endpoints and complete data analysis for a trial or we may decide to slow down the enrollment in a trial in order to conserve financial resources.
Our agents in development are also subject to the risks of failure inherent in drug development and testing. The results of preliminary studies do not necessarily predict clinical success, and larger and later stage clinical trials may not produce the same results as earlier stage trials. Sometimes, agents that have shown promising results in early clinical trials have subsequently suffered significant setbacks in later clinical trials. Agents in later stage clinical trials may fail to show desired safety and efficacy traits, despite having progressed through initial clinical testing. In addition, the data collected from clinical trials of our agents in development may not be sufficient to support regulatory approval, or regulators could interpret the data differently and less favorably than we do. Further, the design of a clinical trial can determine whether its results will support approval of a product, and flaws in the design of a clinical trial may not become apparent until the clinical trial is well advanced. Clinical trials of potential products often reveal that it is not practical or feasible to continue development efforts. Regulatory authorities may require us or our partners to conduct additional clinical testing, in which case we would have to expend additional time and resources. The approval process may also be delayed by changes in government regulation, future legislation or administrative action or changes in regulatory policy that occur prior to or during regulatory review. The failure to provide clinical and preclinical data that are adequate to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the regulatory authorities that our agents in development are safe and effective for their proposed use will delay or preclude approval and will prevent us from marketing those products.
We are not permitted to market our agents in development in the U.S. or other countries until we have received requisite regulatory approvals. For example, securing FDA approval for a new drug requires the submission of an NDA to the FDA for our agents in development. The NDA must include extensive nonclinical and clinical data and supporting information to establish the agent’s safety and effectiveness for each indication. The NDA must also include significant information regarding the chemistry, manufacturing and controls for the product. The FDA review process can take many years to complete, and approval is never guaranteed. If a product is approved, the FDA may limit the indications for which the product may be marketed, require extensive warnings on the product labeling, impose restricted distribution programs, require expedited reporting of certain adverse events, or require costly ongoing requirements for post-marketing clinical studies and surveillance or other risk management measures to monitor the safety or efficacy of the agent. Markets outside of the U.S. also have requirements for approval of agents with which we must comply prior to marketing. Obtaining regulatory approval for marketing of an agent in one country does not ensure we will be able to obtain regulatory approval in other countries, but a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one country may have a negative effect on the regulatory process in other countries. Also, any regulatory approval of any of our products or agents in development, once obtained, may be withdrawn. Approvals might not be granted on a timely basis, if at all.
In our flurpiridaz F 18 Phase 3 program, in May 2015, we announced complete results from the 301 trial. Although flurpiridaz F 18 appeared to be well-tolerated from a safety perspective and outperformed SPECT in a highly statistically significant manner in the co-primary endpoint of sensitivity and in the secondary endpoints of image quality and diagnostic certainty, the agent did not meet its other co-primary endpoint of non-inferiority for identifying subjects without disease. In April 2017, we entered into the License Agreement with GE Healthcare for the continued Phase 3 development and worldwide commercialization of flurpiridaz F 18. Under the License Agreement, GE Healthcare will, among other things, complete the worldwide development of flurpiridaz F 18 by conducting a second Phase 3 trial and pursue worldwide regulatory approvals. We cannot assure any particular outcome from GE Healthcare’s continued Phase 3 development of the agent or from regulatory review of either our or their Phase 3 study of the agent, that any of the data generated in either our or their sponsored Phase 3 study will be sufficient to support an NDA approval, that GE Healthcare will only have to conduct the one additional Phase 3 clinical study prior to filing an NDA, or that flurpiridaz F 18 will ever be approved as a PET MPI imaging agent by the FDA. Similarly, we can give no assurance that we will be successful in our clinical development program for LMI 1195 in the diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumors in pediatric and adult populations. For our DEFINITY for LVEF study, we did not achieve our primary or secondary endpoints in the first of two Phase 3 studies. Any failure or significant delay in completing clinical trials for our product candidates or in receiving regulatory approval for the sale of our product candidates may harm our business and delay or prevent us from being able to generate additional future revenue from product sales.
Even if our agents in development proceed successfully through clinical trials and receive regulatory approval, there is no guarantee that an approved product can be manufactured in commercial quantities at a reasonable cost or that such a product will be successfully marketed or distributed. The burden associated with the marketing and distribution of products like ours is substantial. For example, rather than being manufactured at our own facilities, both flurpiridaz F 18 and LMI 1195 would require the creation of a complex, field-based network involving PET cyclotrons located at radiopharmacies where the agent would need to be manufactured and distributed rapidly to end-users, given the agent’s 110-minute half-life. In addition, in the case of both flurpiridaz F 18 and LMI 1195, obtaining adequate reimbursement is critical, including not only coverage from Medicare, Medicaid, other government payors as well as private payors but also appropriate payment levels which adequately cover the substantially higher manufacturing and distribution costs associated with a PET agent in comparison to a Tc-99m-based agent. We can give no assurance even if either flurpiridaz F 18 or LMI 1195 obtains regulatory approval that a network of PET cyclotrons can be established or that adequate reimbursement can be secured to allow the approved agent or agents to become commercially successful.
Our future growth may depend on our ability to identify and acquire or in-license additional products, businesses or technologies, and if we do not successfully do so, or otherwise fail to integrate any new products, lines of business or technologies into our operations, we may have limited growth opportunities and it could result in significant impairment charges or other adverse financial consequences.
We are continuing to seek to acquire or in-license products, businesses or technologies that we believe are a strategic fit with our business strategy. Future acquisitions or in-licenses, however, may entail numerous operational and financial risks, including:
A reduction of our current financial resources;
Incurrence of substantial debt or dilutive issuances of securities to pay for acquisitions;
Difficulty or inability to secure financing to fund development activities for those acquired or in-licensed technologies;
Higher than expected acquisition and integration costs;
Disruption of our business, customer base and diversion of our management’s time and attention to develop acquired products or technologies; and
Exposure to unknown liabilities.
We may not have sufficient resources to identify and execute the acquisition or in-licensing of third party products, businesses and technologies and integrate them into our current infrastructure. In particular, we may compete with larger pharmaceutical companies and other competitors in our efforts to establish new collaborations and in-licensing opportunities. These competitors likely will have access to greater financial resources than we do and may have greater expertise in identifying and evaluating new opportunities. Furthermore, there may be overlap between our products or customers and the companies which we acquire that may create conflicts in relationships or other commitments detrimental to the integrated businesses. Additionally, the time between our expenditures to acquire or in-license new products, technologies or businesses and the subsequent generation of revenues from those acquired products, technologies or businesses (or the timing of revenue recognition related to licensing agreements and/or strategic collaborations) could cause fluctuations in our financial performance from period to period. Finally, if we devote resources to potential acquisitions or in-licensing opportunities that are never completed, or if we fail to realize the anticipated benefits of those efforts, we could incur significant impairment charges or other adverse financial consequences.
If we are unable to protect our intellectual property, our competitors could develop and market products with features similar to our products, and demand for our products may decline.
Our commercial success will depend in part on obtaining and maintaining patent and trade secret protection of our commercial products and technologies and agents in development as well as successfully enforcing and defending these patents and trade secrets against third parties and their challenges, both in the U.S. and in foreign countries. We will only be able to protect our intellectual property from unauthorized use by third parties to the extent that we maintain the secrecy of our trade secrets and can enforce our valid patents and trademarks.
The patent positions of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies can be highly uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions for which important legal principles remain unresolved. In addition, changes in either the patent laws or in interpretations of patent laws in the U.S. or other countries may diminish the value of our intellectual property and we may not receive the same degree of protection in every jurisdiction. Accordingly, we cannot predict the breadth of claims that may be allowed or enforced in our patents or in third party patents.
The degree of future protection for our proprietary rights is uncertain because legal means afford only limited protection and may not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or keep our competitive advantage. For example:
•We might not have been the first to make the inventions covered by each of our pending patent applications and issued patents, and we could lose our patent rights as a result;
•We might not have been the first to file patent applications for these inventions or our patent applications may not have been timely filed, and we could lose our patent rights as a result;
•Others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or duplicate any of our technologies;
•It is possible that none of our pending patent applications will result in any further issued patents;
•Our issued patents may not provide a basis for commercially viable drugs, may not provide us with any protection from unauthorized use of our intellectual property by third parties, and may not provide us with any competitive advantages;
Our•The validity or enforceability of our patent applications or patents may be subject to challenge through interferences, oppositions, post-grant review, ex-parte re-examinations, inter partes review or similar administrative proceedings;
•While we generally apply for patents in those countries where we intend to make, have made, use or sell patented products, we may not be able to accurately predict all of the countries where patent protection will ultimately be desirable and may be precluded from doing so at a later date;
•We may choose not to seek patent protection in certain countries where the actual cost outweighs the perceived benefit at a certain time;
•Patents issued in foreign jurisdictions may have different scopes of coverage than our U.S. patents and so our products may not receive the same degree of protection in foreign countries as they would in the U.S.;
•We may not develop additional proprietary technologies that are patentable; or
•The patents of others may have an adverse effect on our business.
Moreover, the issuance of a patent is not conclusive as to its validity or enforceability. A third party may challenge the validity or enforceability of a patent even after its issuance by the USPTO or the applicable foreign patent office. It is also uncertain how much protection, if any, will be afforded by our patents if we attempt to enforce them and they are challenged in court or in other proceedings, which may be brought in U.S. or non-U.S. jurisdictions to challenge the validity of a patent.
The initiation, defense and prosecution of intellectual property suits (including Hatch-Waxman related litigation), interferences, oppositions and related legal and administrative proceedings are costly, time consuming to pursue and result in a diversion of resources, including a significant amount of management time. The outcome of these proceedings is uncertain and could significantly harm our business. If we are not able to enforce and defend the patents of our technologies and products, then we will not be able to exclude competitors from marketing products that directly compete with our products, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
For DEFINITY, our fastest growing and highest margin commercial product in 2019, we continue to actively pursue patents in both the U.S. and internationally. In the U.S., we now have an Orange Book-listed method of use patent expiring in March 2037 and additional manufacturing patents that are not Orange Book-listed expiring in 2021, 2023 and 2037. Outside of the U.S., while our DEFINITY patent protection and regulatory exclusivity have generally expired, we are currently prosecuting additional patents to try to obtain similar method of use and manufacturing patent protection as granted in the U.S. We were also recently granted a composition of matter patent on the modified formulation of DEFINITY which runs through December 2035. If the modified formulation is approved by the FDA, then this patent would be eligible to be listed in the Orange Book.
We will also rely on trade secrets and other know-how and proprietary information to protect our technology, especially where we do not believe patent protection is appropriate or obtainable. However, trade secrets are difficult to protect. We use reasonable efforts to protect our trade secrets, but our employees, consultants, contractors, outside scientific partners and other advisors may unintentionally or willfully disclose our confidential information to competitors or other third parties. Enforcing a claim that a third party improperly obtained and is using our trade secrets is expensive, time consuming and resource intensive, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, courts outside the U.S. are sometimes less willing to protect trade secrets. Moreover, our competitors may independently develop equivalent knowledge, methods and know-how. We rely on confidentiality agreements with our collaborators, employees, consultants and other third parties and invention assignment agreements with our employees to protect our trade secrets and other know-how and proprietary information concerning our business. These confidentiality agreements may not prevent unauthorized disclosure of trade secrets and other know-how and proprietary information, and there can be no guarantee that an employee or an outside party will not make an unauthorized disclosure of our trade secrets, other technical know-how or proprietary information, or that we can detect such an unauthorized disclosure. We may not have adequate remedies for any unauthorized disclosure. This might happen intentionally or inadvertently. It is possible that a competitor will make use of that information, and that our competitive position will be compromised, in spite of any legal action we might take against persons making those unauthorized disclosures, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We rely on our trademarks, trade names and brand names to distinguish our products from the products of our competitors, and have registered or applied to register many of these trademarks, including, among others, DEFINITY, Cardiolite, TechneLite, Neurolite, Quadramet, Luminity and Lantheus Medical Imaging.trademarks. We cannot assure you that any pending trademark applications will be approved. Third parties may also oppose our trademark applications, or otherwise challenge our use of the trademarks. If our trademarks are successfully challenged, we could be forced to re-brand our products, which could result in loss of brand recognition, and could require us to devote resources to advertising and marketing new brands. Further, we cannot assure you that competitors will not infringe our trademarks, or that we will have adequate resources to enforce our trademarks.
Our patents are subject to generic challenge, and the validity, enforceability and commercial value of these patents are highly uncertain.
Our ability to obtain and defend our patents impacts the commercial value of our products and product candidates. Third parties have challenged and are likely to continue challenging the patents that have been issued or licensed to us. Patent protection involves complex legal and factual questions and, therefore, enforceability is uncertain. Our patents may be challenged, invalidated, held to be unenforceable, or circumvented, which could negatively impact their commercial value. Furthermore, patent applications filed outside the United States may be challenged by other parties, for example, by filing third party observations that argue against patentability or an opposition. Such opposition proceedings are increasingly common in the EU and are costly to defend. For example, we received notices of opposition to three European patents relating to RELISTOR.
Pursuant to the RELISTOR license agreement between us and Bausch, Bausch has the first right to enforce the intellectual property rights at issue and is responsible for the costs of such enforcement. At the same time, we may incur substantial further costs in supporting the effort to uphold the validity of patents or to prevent infringement. Patent disputes are frequent, costly and can preclude, delay or increase the cost of commercialization of products. Progenics has previously been and is currently involved in patent litigation, and we expect to be subject to patent litigation in the future.
We may be subject to claims that we have infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated the patent or other intellectual property rights of a third party. The outcome of any of these claims is uncertain and any unfavorable result could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may be subject to claims by third parties that we have infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated their intellectual property rights. WhileWe are aware of intellectual property rights held by third parties that relate to products or technologies we believe that the products thatare developing. For example, we currently manufacture using our proprietary technology do not infringe upon or otherwise violate proprietary rightsare aware of other partiesgroups investigating PSMA or that meritorious defenses would exist with respectrelated compounds and monoclonal antibodies directed at PSMA, PSMA-targeted imaging agents and therapeutics, and methylnaltrexone and other peripheral opioid antagonists, and of patents held, and patent applications filed, by these groups in those areas. While the validity of these issued patents, the patentability of pending patent applications and the applicability of any of them to our products and programs are uncertain, if asserted against us, any assertionsrelated patent or other intellectual property rights could adversely affect our ability to the contrary, we cannot assure you that we would not be found to infringe on or otherwise violate the proprietary rights of others.commercialize our products.
We may be subject to litigation over infringement claims regarding the products we manufacture or distribute. This type of litigation can be costly and time consuming and could divert management’s attention and resources, generate significant expenses, damage payments (potentially including treble damages) or restrictions or prohibitions on our use of our technology, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. In addition, if we are found to be infringing on proprietary rights of others, we may be required to develop non-infringing technology, obtain a license (which may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all), make substantial one-time or ongoing royalty payments, or cease making, using and/or selling the infringing products, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We may be adversely affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors beyond our control.
Our ability to attract and retain customers, invest in and grow our business, maintain our desired levels of costs of goods sold and operating expenses and meet our financial obligations depends on our operating and financial performance, which, in turn, is subject to numerous factors, including the prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors beyond our control, such as the rate of unemployment, the number of uninsured persons in the U.S. and inflationary pressures.pressures, including escalating energy prices. We cannot anticipate all the ways in which the current or future economic climate and financial market conditions could adversely impact our business. We are exposed to risks associated with reduced profitability and the potential financial instability of our customers, many of which may be adversely affected by volatile conditions in the financial markets. For example, unemployment and underemployment, and the resultant loss of insurance, may decrease the demand for healthcare services and pharmaceuticals. If fewer patients are seeking medical care because they do not have insurance coverage, our customers may experience reductions in revenues, profitability and/or cash flow that could lead them to modify, delay or cancel orders for our products. If customers are not successful in generating sufficient revenue or are precluded from securing financing, they may not be able to pay, or may delay payment of, accounts receivable that are owed to us. This, in turn, could adversely affect our financial condition and liquidity. To the extent prevailing economic conditions result in fewer procedures being performed, our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be adversely affected.
Similarly, we would expect our costs of goods sold and other operating expenses to change in the future in line with periodic inflationary changes in price levels. Because we intend to retain and continue to use our property and equipment, we believe that the incremental inflation related to the replacement costs of those items will not materially affect our operations. However, the rate of inflation affects our expenses, such as those for employee compensation, contract services, and transportation costs, which could increase our level of expenses and the rate at which we use our resources. While we generally believe that we will be able to offset the effect of price-level changes by adjusting our product prices and implementing operating efficiencies, any material unfavorable changes in price levels could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our business is subject to international economic, political and other risks that could negatively affect our results of operations or financial position.
For the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, we derived approximately 12%3.6% of our revenues fromand sourced approximately 17.5% of our costs of goods sold outside of the fifty United States. Accordingly, our business is subject to risks associated with doing business internationally, including:
•Less stable political and economic environmentsenvironment and changes in a specific country’s or region’s political or economic conditions;
•Changes in trade policies, regulatory requirements and other barriers, including, for example, U.S. trade sanctions against Iran and those countries and entities doing business with Iran, which could adversely impact international isotope production and, indirectly, our global supply chain;
•Potential global disruptions in air transport due to COVID-19, (coronavirus), which could adversely affect our international supply chains for radioisotopes and our modified formulation of DEFINITY RT as well as international distribution channels for our commercial products;
•Entering into, renewing or enforcing commercial agreements with international governments or provincial authorities or entities directly or indirectly owned or controlled by such governments or authorities, such as our Belgian, Australian and South African isotope suppliers, IRE, ANSTO and NTP, and our Chinese development and commercialization partner, Double-Crane Pharmaceutical Company;Double-Crane;
•International customers which are agencies or institutions owned or controlled by foreign governments;
•Local business practices which may be in conflict with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and U.K. Bribery Act;
•Currency fluctuations;
•Unfavorable labor regulations;
•Greater difficulties in relying on non-U.S. courts to enforce either local or U.S. laws, particularly with respect to intellectual property;
•Greater potential for intellectual property piracy;
•Greater difficulties in managing and staffing non-U.S. operations;operations, including our EXINI operations in Sweden;
•The need to ensure compliance with the numerous in-country and international regulatory and legal requirements applicable to our business in each of these jurisdictions and to maintain an effective compliance program to ensure compliance with these requirements, including in connection with the recently enacted GDPR in the EU;
•Changes in public attitudes about the perceived safety of nuclear facilities;
•Civil unrest or other catastrophic events; and
•Longer payment cycles of non-U.S. customers and difficulty collecting receivables in non-U.S. jurisdictions.
These factors are beyond our control. The realization of any of these or other risks associated with operating outside the fifty United States could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. As our international exposure increases and as we execute our strategy of international expansion, these risks may intensify.
We face currency and other risks associated with international sales.
We generate revenue from export sales, as well as from operations conducted outside the fifty United States. Operations outside the U.S. expose us to risks including fluctuations in currency values, trade restrictions, tariff and trade regulations, U.S. export controls, U.S. and non‑U.S. tax laws, shipping delays and economic and political instability. For example, violations of U.S. export controls, including those administered by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, could result in fines, other civil or criminal penalties and the suspension or loss of export privileges which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial conditions and cash flows.
Many of our customer relationships outside of the U.S. are, either directly or indirectly, with governmental entities, and we could be adversely affected by violations of the FCPA and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws outside the U.S.
The FCPA, the Bribery Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws in non-U.S. jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to non-U.S. officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business.
The FCPA prohibits us from providing anything of value to foreign officials for the purposes of obtaining or retaining business or securing any improper business advantage. It also requires us to keep books and records that accurately and fairly reflect our transactions. Because of the predominance of government-sponsored healthcare systems around the world, many of our customer relationships outside of the U.S. are, either directly or indirectly, with governmental entities and are therefore subject to the FCPA and similar anti-bribery laws in non-U.S. jurisdictions. In addition, the provisions of the Bribery Act extend beyond bribery of foreign public officials and are more onerous than the FCPA in a number of other respects, including jurisdiction, non-exemption of facilitation payments and penalties.
Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws. We operate in many parts of the world that have experienced governmental corruption to some degree, and in certain circumstances strict compliance with anti-bribery laws may conflict with local customs and practices. Despite our training and compliance programs, our internal control policies and procedures may not always protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed by our employees or agents. Violations of these laws, or allegations of those violations, could disrupt our business and result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Our business depends on the continued effectiveness and availability of our information technology infrastructure, and failures of this infrastructure could harm our operations.
To remain competitive in our industry, we must employ information technologies to support manufacturing processes, quality processes, distribution, R&D and regulatory applications and that capture, manage and analyze large streams of data in compliance with applicable regulatory requirements. We rely extensively on technology, some of which is managed by third-partythird party service providers, to allow the concurrent conduct of work sharing around the world. As with all information technology, our equipment and infrastructure age and become subject to increasing maintenance and repair and our systems generally are vulnerable to potential damage or interruptions from fires, natural disasters, power outages, blackouts, machinery breakdown, telecommunications failures and other unexpected events, as well as to break-ins, sabotage, increasingly sophisticated intentional acts of vandalism or cybersecurity threats which, due to the nature of such attacks, may remain undetected for a period of time. As these threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend additional resources to enhance our information security measures or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities. Given the extensive reliance of our business on technology, any substantial disruption or resulting loss of data that is not avoided or corrected by our backup measures could harm our business, reputation, operations and financial condition.
A disruption in our computer networks, including those related to cybersecurity, could adversely affect our operations or financial position.
We rely on our computer networks and systems, some of which are managed by third parties, to manage and store electronic information (including sensitive data such as confidential business information, and personally identifiable data relating to employees)and personal health information), and to manage or support a variety of critical business processes and activities. We may face threats to our networks from unauthorized access, security breaches and other system disruptions. Despite our security measures, our infrastructure may be vulnerable to external or internal attacks. Any such security breach may compromise information stored on our networks and may result in significant data losses or theft of sensitive or proprietary information. A cybersecurity breach could hurt our reputation by adversely affecting the perception of customers and potential customers of the security of their orders and personal information, as well as the perception of our manufacturing partners of the security of their proprietary information. In addition, a cybersecurity attack could result in other negative consequences, including disruption of our internal operations, increased cybersecurity protection costs, lost revenue, regulatory actions or litigation. Any disruption of internal operations could also have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. To date, we have not experienced any material cybersecurity attacks.
We may be limited in our ability to utilize, or may not be able to utilize, net operating loss carryforwards to reduce our future tax liability.
As of December 31, 2019,2022, we had U.S. federal income tax loss carryforwards of approximately $174.0$338.4 million,, $200.4 million of which will begin to expire in 2032between 2024 and will completely expire in 2037.2037, $138.0 million of which can be carried forward indefinitely, and state income tax loss carryforwards of $11.6 million, tax-effected. We may be limited in our ability to use these tax loss carryforwards to reduce our future U.S. federal and state income tax liabilities if our future income is not sufficient to absorb the losses, or if we were to experience another “ownership change” as specified in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code including if we were to issue a certain amount of equity securities, certain of our stockholders were to sell shares of our common stock, or we were to enter into certain strategic transactions.
We may not be able to hire or retain the number of qualified personnel, particularly scientific, medicalare involved in various legal proceedings that are uncertain, costly and sales personnel, required fortime-consuming and could have a material adverse impact on our business, which would harmfinancial condition and results of operations.
From time to time we are involved in legal proceedings and disputes and may be involved in litigation in the developmentfuture. These proceedings are complex and salesextended and occupy the resources of our productsmanagement and limit our abilityemployees. These proceedings are also costly to grow.
Competitionprosecute and defend and may involve substantial awards or damages payable by us if not found in our industry for highly skilled scientific, healthcarefavor. We may also be required to pay substantial amounts or grant certain rights on unfavorable terms in order to settle such proceedings. Defending against or settling such claims and sales personnel is intense. Although we have not had any material difficulty in the past in hiringunfavorable legal decisions, settlements or retaining qualified personnel, if we are unable to retain our existing personnel, or attract and train additional qualified personnel, either because of competition in our industry for these personnel or because of insufficient financial resources, then our growth may be limited and itorders could have a material adverse effect on our business.business, financial condition and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common stock to decline.
In particular, the pharmaceutical and medical device industries historically have generated substantial litigation concerning the manufacture, use and sale of products, and we expect this litigation activity to continue. As a result, we expect that patents related to our products will routinely be challenged, and our patents may not be upheld. In order to protect or enforce patent rights, we may initiate litigation against third parties. If we lose the servicesare not successful in defending an attack on our patents and maintaining exclusive rights to market one or more of our key personnel,products still under patent protection, we could lose a significant portion of sales in a very short period. We may also become subject to infringement claims by third parties and may have to defend against charges that we violated patents or the proprietary rights of third parties. If we infringe the intellectual property rights of others, we could lose our businessright to develop, manufacture or sell products, or could be adversely affected.required to pay monetary damages or royalties to license proprietary rights from third parties.
Our success is substantially dependent uponIn addition, in the performance, contributions U.S., it has become increasingly common for patent infringement actions to prompt claims that antitrust laws have been violated during the prosecution of the patent or during litigation involving the defense of that patent. Such claims by direct
and expertise of our chief executive officer, executive leadership and senior management team. Mary Anne Heino, our Chief Executive Officer and President,indirect purchasers and other memberspayors are typically filed as class actions. The relief sought may include treble damages and restitution claims. Similarly, antitrust claims may be brought by government entities or private parties following settlement of our executive leadershippatent litigation, alleging that such settlements are anti-competitive and senior management team playin violation of antitrust laws. In the U.S. and Europe, regulatory authorities have continued to challenge as anti-competitive so-called “reverse payment” settlements between branded and generic drug manufacturers. We may also be subject to other antitrust litigation involving competition claims unrelated to patent infringement and prosecution. A successful antitrust claim by a significant role in generating new business and retaining existing customers. We have an employment agreement with Ms. Heino and a limited number of other individuals on our executive leadership team, although we cannot prevent them from terminating their employment with us. We do not maintain key person life insurance policies on any of our executive officers. While we have experienced both voluntary and involuntary turnover on our executive leadership team, to date we have been able to attract new, qualified individuals to lead our company and key functional areas. Our inability to retain our existing executive leadership and senior management team, maintain an appropriate internal succession programprivate party or attract and retain additional qualified personnelgovernment entity against us could have a material adverse effect on our business.business, financial condition and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common stock to decline.
Risks Related to our and our Strategic Partners’ Portfolios of Clinical Development Candidates
We may not, or may take longer to, realize the expected benefits and opportunities related to, the POINT License Agreements.
On December 20, 2022, we announced the closing of a set of strategic collaborations with an affiliate of POINT, in which we were granted a license to exclusive worldwide rights (excluding Japan, South Korea, China (including Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan), Singapore and Indonesia) to co-develop and commercialize POINT’s PNT2002 and PNT2003 product candidates (the “POINT License Agreements”). The expected benefits and opportunities related to the POINT License Agreements may not be realized or may take longer to realize than expected due to, for example, challenges and uncertainties inherent in product research, development, manufacturing, regulatory approval, marketing and competition. In particular, activities under the POINT License Agreements may not result in viable products suitable for commercialization in a timely manner or at all, due to a variety of reasons, including any inability of the relevant parties to perform their commitments and obligations under the POINT License Agreements. The POINT License Agreements impose various development, regulatory filing, commercialization and other obligations on us, and require us to meet development timelines or to exercise commercially reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize licensed products. We, along with our counterparty in the POINT License Agreements, may not be able to meet expected or planned regulatory milestones and timelines due to a number of factors, including, with respect to PNT2003, potential litigation under the Hatch-Waxman Act that could impose a stay on FDA approval of up to 30 months. Even if the licensed products are suitable for commercialization in a timely manner, we may not achieve the expected revenues from the sale of such products, and our revenue, ability to achieve profitability and return on investment may be adversely affected.
In addition, we are dependent on POINT to fund and complete its Phase 3 clinical trial, with respect to PNT2002, and to facilitate completion of its ongoing study, with respect to PNT2003. We are also dependent on POINT to develop commercial product capacity and manufacture clinical and commercial supply for both PNT2002 and PNT2003.
Disagreements with the counterparty in the POINT License Agreements over proprietary rights, contract interpretation or the preferred course of product research, development or marketing, might cause delays in performance of the POINT License Agreements or termination of the POINT License Agreements, or might result in litigation or arbitration, which could be time-consuming and expensive.
In spite of our efforts, if we fail to comply with our obligations under the POINT License Agreements, the counterparty in the POINT License Agreements may conclude that we have materially breached and may terminate one or both of the POINT License Agreements, in which event we may lose our rights to develop and market PNT2002 and PNT2003 or incur liability for damages.
Any of the foregoing risks could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and prospects and the trading price of our common stock.
The process of developing new drugs and obtaining regulatory approval is complex, time-consuming and costly, and the outcome is not certain.
We currently have clinical development programs in the U.S., including those related to PNT2002 and PNT2003, and are exploring additional lifecycle management opportunities for some of our current products. We also have a number of strategic partnerships relating to obtaining additional indications for existing commercial products or regulatory approval for clinical development candidates. To obtain regulatory approval for these agents in the indications being pursued, we must conduct extensive human tests, which are referred to as clinical trials, as well as meet other rigorous regulatory requirements, as further described in Part I, Item 1. “Business—Regulatory Matters.” Satisfaction of all regulatory requirements typically takes many years and requires the expenditure of substantial resources. A number of other factors may cause significant delays in the completion of our clinical trials, including unexpected delays in the initiation of clinical sites, slower than projected enrollment, competition with ongoing clinical trials and scheduling conflicts with participating clinicians, regulatory requirements, limits on manufacturing capacity and failure of an agent to meet required standards for administration to humans. In addition, it may take longer than we project to achieve study endpoints and complete data analysis for a clinical trial or we may decide to slow down the enrollment in a trial in order to conserve financial resources.
Our products in development are also subject to the risks of failure inherent in drug development, drug testing and regulatory approval. The results of preliminary studies do not necessarily predict clinical success, and larger and later stage clinical trials may not produce the same results as earlier stage trials. Sometimes, products that have shown promising results in early clinical trials have subsequently suffered significant setbacks in later clinical trials. Agents in later stage clinical trials may fail to show desired safety and efficacy traits, despite having progressed through initial clinical testing. In addition, the data collected from clinical trials of our products in development may not be sufficient to support regulatory approval, or regulators could interpret the data differently and less favorably than we do. Further, the design of a clinical trial can determine whether its results will support approval of a product, and flaws in the design of a clinical trial may not become apparent until the clinical trial is well advanced. Clinical trials of potential products often reveal that it is not practical or feasible to continue development efforts. Regulatory authorities may require us or our partners to conduct additional clinical testing, in which case we would have to expend additional time and resources. Depending on the regulatory pathway selected for drug approval, such as by filing an ANDA or Section 505(b)(2) NDA that requires sending notice to the innovator of a drug, regulatory approval may also be delayed by litigation brought under the Hatch-Waxman Act. The approval process may also be delayed by changes in government regulation, future legislation or administrative action or changes in regulatory policy that occur prior to or during regulatory review. The failure to provide clinical and preclinical data that are adequate to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the regulatory authorities that our products in development are safe and effective for their proposed use will delay or preclude approval and will prevent us from marketing those products.
We are not permitted to market our products in development in the U.S. or other countries until we have received requisite regulatory approvals. For example, securing FDA approval for a new drug requires the submission of an NDA to the FDA for our products in development. The NDA must include extensive nonclinical and clinical data and supporting information to establish the product’s safety and effectiveness for each indication. The NDA must also include significant information regarding the chemistry, manufacturing and controls for the product. The FDA review process can take many years to complete, and approval is never guaranteed. If a product is approved, the FDA may limit the indications for which the product may be marketed, require extensive warnings on the product labeling, impose restricted distribution programs, require expedited reporting of certain adverse events, or require costly ongoing requirements for post-marketing clinical studies and surveillance or other risk management measures to monitor the safety or efficacy of the product. In some instances, products in development may also be approved by filing an ANDA or Section 505(b)(2) NDA with the FDA (as further described in Part I, Item 1. “Business—Regulatory Matters—Hatch-Waxman Act.”); provided, however, that seeking regulatory approval under such pathways may subject the product candidate to delays caused by litigation brought by an innovator of similar drugs under the Hatch-Waxman Act. Markets outside of the U.S. also have requirements for approval of products with which we must comply prior to marketing. Obtaining regulatory approval for marketing of a product in one country does not ensure we will be able to obtain regulatory approval in other countries, but a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one country may have a negative effect on the regulatory process in other countries. Also, any regulatory approval of any of our products in development, once obtained, may be withdrawn. Approvals might not be granted on a timely basis, if at all.
We can give no assurance that Curium will be successful with approval and commercialization of piflufolastat F 18 in Europe.
We have licensed exclusive rights to Curium to develop and commercialize piflufolastat F 18 in Europe. Under the terms of the collaboration, Curium is responsible for the development, regulatory approvals and commercialization of piflufolastat F 18 in Europe, and we are entitled to double-digit royalties on net sales of piflufolastat F 18. In June 2022, Curium announced that it had submitted its marketing authorization application to the EMA seeking approval for piflufolastat F 18 in Europe. We cannot assure that the EMA will approve piflufolastat F 18 in Europe or that Curium will be successful in commercializing it in Europe. Any failure or significant delay in receiving regulatory approval for the sale of piflufolastat F 18 in Europe may harm our business and delay or prevent us from being able to generate additional future royalty revenue from product sales.
We can give no assurance that GE Healthcare will be successful with the further clinical development of flurpiridaz.
In May 2015, we announced complete results from the first of two planned Phase 3 clinical trials for flurpiridaz. Although the development candidate appeared to be well-tolerated from a safety perspective and outperformed SPECT in a highly statistically significant manner in the co-primary endpoint of sensitivity and in the secondary endpoints of image quality and diagnostic certainty, flurpiridaz did not meet its other co-primary endpoint of non-inferiority for identifying subjects without disease. In April 2017, we entered into the License Agreement with GE Healthcare for the continued Phase 3 development and worldwide commercialization of flurpiridaz. Under the License Agreement, GE Healthcare agreed, among other things, to complete the worldwide development of flurpiridaz by conducting a second Phase 3 trial and pursue worldwide regulatory approvals. In September 2022, we announced with GE Healthcare that the second Phase 3 clinical trial had met its co-primary endpoints of exceeding a 60% threshold for both sensitivity and specificity for detecting CAD. The findings, shared at an American Society of Nuclear Cardiology conference, also demonstrated that cardiac PET imaging with flurpiridaz had higher diagnostic efficacy and image quality in patients with suspected CAD, compared with SPECT MPI, the predominant procedure currently used in nuclear cardiology. Notwithstanding these findings, we cannot assure that any of the data generated in either our or GE Healthcare’s sponsored Phase 3 study will be sufficient to support an NDA approval, that GE Healthcare will only have to conduct the one additional Phase 3 clinical study prior to filing an NDA, or that flurpiridaz will
ever be approved as a PET MPI imaging agent by the FDA. Any failure or significant delay in completing additional clinical trials for flurpiridaz or in receiving regulatory approval for the sale of flurpiridaz may harm our business and delay or prevent us from being able to generate additional future royalty revenue from product sales.
Even if clinical development candidates receive regulatory approval, we can give no assurance that they can be successfully commercialized.
Even if our clinical development candidates proceed through their clinical trials and ultimately receive regulatory approval, there is no guarantee that an approved product can be manufactured in commercial quantities at a reasonable cost or that such a product will be successfully marketed or distributed. For example, the manufacturing, marketing and distribution of a radiopharmaceutical like flurpiridaz will require the creation of a field-based network of specialized PET manufacturing facilities, or PMFs, with radioisotope-producing cyclotrons, similar to what we created for PYLARIFY, and will need to be manufactured and distributed rapidly to end-users.
In addition, obtaining adequate coding, coverage and payment at appropriate payment levels for any clinical development candidate will be critical, including not only coverage from Medicare, Medicaid, and other government payors, but also from private payors. We can give no assurance, even if a clinical development candidate were to obtain regulatory approval, that adequate coding, coverage and payment could be secured to allow the approved products to become successfully commercialized.
We have been and expect to continue to be dependent on partners for the development of certain product candidates, which expose us to the risk of reliance on these partners.
In connection with our ongoing development activities, we currently depend, and expect to continue to depend, on numerous collaborators. For example, in addition to our collaboration with Curium on piflufolastat F 18 in Europe, GE Healthcare on flurpiridaz and POINT on PNT2002 and PNT2003, we have other collaborations to develop and commercialize products. In addition, certain clinical trials for our product candidates may be conducted by government-sponsored agencies, and consequently will be dependent on governmental participation and funding. These arrangements expose us to the same considerations we face when contracting with third parties for our own trials.
If any of our collaborators breach or terminate its agreement with us or otherwise fail to conduct successfully and in a timely manner the collaborative activities for which they are responsible, the preclinical or clinical development or commercialization of the affected product candidate or research program could be delayed or terminated. We generally do not control the amount and timing of resources that our collaborators devote to our programs or product candidates. We also do not know whether current or future collaboration partners, if any, might pursue alternative technologies or develop alternative products either on their own or in collaboration with others, including our competitors, as a means for developing treatments for the diseases or conditions targeted by our collaborative arrangements. Our collaborators are also subject to similar development, regulatory, manufacturing, cyber-security and competitive risks as us, which may further impede their ability to successfully perform the collaborative activities for which they are responsible. Setbacks of these types to our collaborators could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We depend on licenses from third parties for our rights to develop and commercialize certain product candidates. If we fail to achieve milestone requirements or to satisfy other conditions, we may lose those rights under those license agreements, and our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Many of our products or product candidates incorporate rights licensed by third parties -- for example, we license patent rights on PYLARIFY from JHU and on PNT2002 and PNT2003 from POINT. We could lose the rights to develop or commercialize these products and product candidates if the related license agreement is terminated due to a breach by us or otherwise. In addition, we are required to make substantial cash payments, achieve milestones and satisfy other conditions, including filing for and obtaining marketing approvals and introducing products, to maintain rights under our license agreements. Due to the nature of these agreements and the uncertainties of development, we may not be able to achieve milestones or satisfy conditions to which we have contractually committed, and as a result may be unable to maintain our rights under these licenses. If we do not comply with our license agreements, the licensors may terminate them, which could result in our losing our rights to, and therefore being unable to commercialize, related products. This loss could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Risks Related to Our Capital Structure
The conditional conversion feature of the 2.625% Convertible Senior Notes due 2027, if triggered, may adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.
On December 8, 2022, we issued $575.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 2.625% Convertible Senior Notes due 2027 (the “Notes”), which included $75.0 million in aggregate principal amount of Notes sold pursuant to the full exercise of the initial purchasers’ option to purchase additional Notes. The Notes were issued under an indenture, dated as of December 8, 2022 (the
“Indenture”), among Holdings, LMI, and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association (“U.S. Bank”), as Trustee. Prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding September 15, 2027, the Notes may be converted at the option of the holders upon occurrence of specified events and during certain periods, and thereafter until the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the maturity date, the Notes may be converted at any time. If one or more holders elect to convert their Notes, we would be required to settle any converted principal amount of such Notes through the payment of cash and by paying or delivering, at our election, cash, shares of our common stock, or a combination of cash and shares, with respect to the remainder of our conversion obligation in excess of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes being converted, which could adversely affect our liquidity. In addition, even if holders do not elect to convert their Notes, we could be required under applicable accounting rules to reclassify all or a portion of the outstanding principal of the Notes as a current rather than long-term liability, which would result in a material reduction of our net working capital.
The issuance or sale of shares of our common stock, or rights to acquire shares of our common stock, could depress the trading price of our common stock.
We havemay conduct future offerings of our common stock, preferred stock or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for our common stock to finance our operations or fund acquisitions, or for other purposes. In addition, we expect to continue to grant equity awards to directors, officers and employees under our equity incentive plans. If we issue additional shares of our common stock or rights to acquire shares of our common stock, if any of our existing stockholders sells a substantial amount of our common stock, or if the market perceives that such issuances or sales may occur, then the trading price of our common stock may significantly decrease. In addition, our issuance of additional shares of common stock will dilute the ownership interests of our existing common stockholders.
Repurchases by us of our common stock may affect the value of our common stock.
In December 2022, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $150.0 million in aggregate amount of our common stock under certain circumstances. We used approximately $75.0 million of the net proceeds from Notes to repurchase shares of our common stock from purchasers of Notes in privately negotiated transactions effected with or through one of the initial purchasers or its affiliate. The purchase price per share of the common stock repurchased in such transactions was equal to the closing sale price per share of our common stock on December 5, 2022, which was $56.01 per share. Following this initial repurchase, we may from time to time repurchase additional shares of our common stock. Such repurchases could increase, or prevent a decrease in, the market price of our common stock.
We have indebtedness which may limit our financial and operating activities and may adversely affect our ability to incur additional debt to fund future needs.
As of December 31, 2019,2022, we had approximately $195.0$575.0 million of total principal indebtedness remaining under our five‑year secured term loan facility, which matures on June 30, 2024 (the “2019 Term Facility” and the loans thereunder, the “2019 Term Loans”)Notes and availability of $200.0$350.0 million under our five-year revolving credit facility (the “2019“2022 Revolving Facility” and, together with the 2019 Term Facility, the “2019 Facility”). Our substantial indebtedness and any future indebtedness we incur could:
•Require us to dedicate a substantial portion of cash flow from operations to the payment of interest on and principal of our indebtedness, thereby reducing the funds available for other purposes;purposes, including for working capital, capital expenditures and acquisitions;
•Make it more difficult for us to satisfy and comply with our obligations with respect to our outstanding indebtedness, namely the payment of interest and principal;
•Make it more difficult to refinance the outstanding indebtedness;
•Subject us to increased sensitivity to interest rate increases;
•Make us more vulnerable to economic downturns, adverse industry or company conditions or catastrophic external events;
•Limit our ability to withstand competitive pressures;
•Reduce our flexibility in planning for or responding to changing business, industry and economic conditions; and
•Place us at a competitive disadvantage to competitors that have relatively less debt than we have.
In addition, our substantial level of indebtedness could limit our ability to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms, or at all, for working capital, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes. Our liquidity needs could vary significantly and may be affected by general economic conditions, industry trends, performance and many other factors not withinoutside our control.
We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our debt service obligations.
Our ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to make scheduled payments on our debt obligations will depend on our future financial performance, which will be affected by a range of economic, competitive and business factors, many of which are outside of our control. If we do not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to satisfy our debt obligations, including interest and principal payments, our credit ratings could be downgraded, and we may have to undertake alternative financing plans, such as refinancing or restructuring our debt, selling assets, entering into additional corporate collaborations or licensing arrangements for one or more of our products or agents in development, reducing or delaying capital investments or seeking to raise additional capital. We cannot assure you that any refinancing would be possible, that any assets could be sold, licensed or partnered, or, if sold, licensed or partnered, of the timing of the transactions and the amount of proceeds realized from those transactions, that additional financing could be obtained on acceptable terms, if at all, or that additional financing would be permitted under the terms of our various debt instruments then in effect. Furthermore, our ability to refinance would depend upon the condition of the financial and credit markets. Our inability to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy our debt obligations, or to refinance our obligations on commercially reasonable terms or on a timely basis, would have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Despite our substantial indebtedness, we may incur more debt, which could exacerbate the risks described above.
We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future subject to the limitations contained in the agreements governing our debt, including the 20192022 Revolving Facility. Although these agreements restrict us and our restricted subsidiaries from incurring additional indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to important exceptions and qualifications. For example, we are generally permitted to incur certain indebtedness, including indebtedness arising in the ordinary course of business, indebtedness among restricted subsidiaries and us and indebtedness relating to hedging obligations. If we or our subsidiaries incur additional debt, the risks that we and they now face as a result of our leverage could intensify. In addition, 2019the 2022 Revolving Facility will not prevent us from incurring obligations that do not constitute indebtedness under the agreements.
Our 20192022 Revolving Facility contains restrictions that will limit our flexibility in operating our business.
Our 20192022 Revolving Facility contains various covenants that limit our ability to engage in specified types of transactions. These covenants limit our and our restricted subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things:
•Maintain net leverage above certain specified levels;
•Maintain interest coverage below certain specified levels;
•Incur additional debt;
•Pay dividends or make other distributions;
•Redeem stock;
•Issue stock of subsidiaries;
•Make certain investments;
•Create liens;
•Enter into transactions with affiliates; and
•Merge, consolidate or transfer all or substantially all of our assets.
A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under the 20192022 Revolving Facility. We may also be unable to take advantage of business opportunities that arise because of the limitations imposed on us by the restrictive covenants under our indebtedness.
U.S. credit markets may impact our ability to obtain financing or increase the cost of future financing, including interest rate fluctuations based on macroeconomic conditions that are beyond our control.
During periods of volatility and disruption in the U.S., European, or global credit markets, obtaining additional or replacement financing may be more difficult and the cost of issuing new debt or replacing or repaying our 20192022 Facility could be higher than under our current 20192022 Facility. Higher cost of new debt may limit our ability to have cash on hand for working capital, capital expenditures and acquisitions on terms that are acceptable to us. Additionally, our 20192022 Facility has variable interest rates. By its nature, a variable interest rate will move up or down based on changes in the economy and other factors, all of which are beyond our control. If interest rates increase, our interest expense could increase, affecting earnings and reducing cash flows available for working capital, capital expenditures and acquisitions.
Our stock price could fluctuate significantly, which could cause the value of your investment to decline, and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above your purchase price.
Securities markets worldwide have experienced, and may continue to experience, significant price and volume fluctuations. This market volatility, as well as general economic, market or political conditions, could reduce the market price of our common stock regardless of our operating performance. The high and low closing sales prices of our common stock during the twelve months ended December 31, 2022 were $86.60 and $24.28, respectively. The trading price of our common stock is likely to be volatile and subject to wide price fluctuations in response to various factors, including:
•Market conditions in the broader stock market;
•Actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly financial and operating results;
•Issuance of new or changed securities analysts’ reports or recommendations;
•Investor perceptions of us and the pharmaceutical and medical technology and pharmaceuticaldevice industries;
•Sales, or anticipated sales, of large blocks of our stock;
•Acquisitions or introductions of new products or services by us or our competitors;
•Positive or negative results from our clinical development programs;
•Additions or departures of key personnel;
•Regulatory or political developments;
•Loss of intellectual property protections;
•Litigation and governmental investigations;
•Geopolitical events; and
•Changing economic conditions.
These and other factors may cause the market price and demand for our common stock to fluctuate substantially, which may limit or prevent investors from readily selling their shares of common stock and may otherwise negatively affect the liquidity of our common stock. In addition, in the past, when the market price of a stock has been volatile, holders of that stock have sometimes instituted securities class action litigation against the company that issued the stock. If any of our stockholders brought a lawsuit against us, we could incur substantial costs defending the lawsuit. Such a lawsuit could also divert the time and attention of our management from our business, which could significantly harm our profitability and reputation.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, if they adversely change their recommendations regarding our stock, or if our results of operations do not meet their expectations, our stock price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more of these analysts ceaseceases coverage of our company or failfails to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline. Moreover, if one or more of the analysts who cover us downgradedowngrades our stock, or if our results of operations do not meet their expectations, our stock price could also decline.
We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends for the foreseeable future.future, and accordingly, stockholders must rely on stock appreciation for any return on their investment.
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, for the foreseeable future, to repay indebtedness and to fund the development and growth of our business. We do not intend to pay any dividends to holders of our common stock and the agreements governing our senior secured credit facilities limit our ability to pay dividends. As a result, capital appreciation in the price of our common stock, if any, will be your only source of gain on an investment in our common stock.
Risks Related to the Progenics Transaction
The Progenics Transaction may not occur,Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and if it does, it may not be accretiveDelaware law and may cause dilution to our earnings per share, which may negatively affect the market price of our common stock.
Although we currently anticipate that the Progenics Transaction will occur and will be accretive to adjusted earnings per share by 2022 and GAAP-reported earnings per share by 2023, these expectations are based on assumptions about our and Progenics’ business and preliminary forecasts, which may change materially. Certain other expenses to be paid in connection with the Progenics Transaction may cause dilution to our earnings per share or decrease or delay the expected accretive effect of the Progenics Transaction and could cause a decreasecertain provisions in the market priceNotes and Indenture may make an acquisition of us more difficult.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as amended and restated, contain provisions that delay, defer or discourage transactions involving an actual or potential change in control of us or change in our common stock. In addition, the Progenics Transactionmanagement. These provisions may not occur or we could encounter additional transaction-related costs or other factors such as the failure to realize all of the benefits anticipated in the Progenics Transaction, including synergies, cost savings, innovation and operational efficiencies and revenue growth from the combination. All of these factors could cause dilution to our earnings per share or decrease or delay the expected accretive effect of the Progenics Transaction and cause a decrease in the market price of our common stock.
The Progenics Transaction is subject to conditions, some or all of which may not be satisfied, or completed on a timely basis, if at all. Failure to complete the Progenics Transaction could have material adverse effects on our business.
The completion of the Progenics Transaction is subject to a number of conditions, including, among others, the approval of the Merger Agreement by a majority of votes cast by the holders of the common stock of the Company and a majority of the outstanding shares of Progenics common stock, the absence of any law or order prohibiting the consummation of the Progenics Transaction or the issuance of the shares ofalso discourage bids for our common stock as deal consideration, the effectiveness ofat a registration statement covering the issuance of shares of our common stock to the stockholders of Progenics, the absence of a material adverse effect on us or Progenics, and other conditions customary for a transaction of this type, which make the completion of the Progenics Transaction and timing thereof uncertain. In addition, the Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for both us and Progenics, including, among other things (i) if the Progenics Transaction is not consummated on or before the “outside date” of July 1, 2020, (ii) if the required approval of our stockholders or the Progenics stockholders is not obtained, (iii) if the other party willfully breaches its non-solicitation obligations in the Merger Agreement, (v) if the other party materially breaches its representations, warranties or covenants and fails to cure such breach, (vi) if any law or order prohibiting the Progenics Transaction or the issuance of the shares of our common stock forming part of the merger consideration has become final and non-appealable, or (vii) if the board of directors of the other party fails to include such party’s recommendation in favor of the Progenics Transaction in the joint proxy statement/prospectus or changes its recommendation in connection with the Progenics Transaction. If the Progenics Transaction is not completed, our ongoing business may be materially adversely affected and, without realizing any of the benefits that we could have realized had the Progenics Transaction been completed, we will be subject to a number of risks, including the following:
Thepremium over market price of our common stock could decline;
We could owe substantial termination fees to Progenics under certain circumstances;
Time and resources committed by our management to matters relating to the Progenics Transaction could otherwise have been devoted to pursuing other beneficial opportunities;
We may experience negative reactions from the financial markets or from our customers, suppliers or employees; and
We will be required to pay our costs relating to the Progenics Transaction, such as legal, accounting, certain financial advisory, consulting and printing fees, whether or not the Progenics Transaction is completed.
Upon termination of the Merger Agreement, we will be required to pay to Progenics a termination fee of $18.34 million if: (i) we willfully breach our nonsolicitation obligations in the Merger Agreement; (ii) our Board changes its recommendation in support of the merger as a result of a superior proposal or intervening event; or (iii) our stockholders do not approve the issuance of common stock in connection with the merger (if at such time Progenics has the right to terminate the Merger Agreement because we willfully breached our nonsolicitation obligations in the Merger Agreement or our board changed its recommendation in support of the merger as a result of a superior proposal or intervening event). In addition, we will be required to pay to Progenics the termination fee if we receive an acquisition proposal, the Merger Agreement is later terminated under certain circumstances and within twelve months after termination we enter into an agreement with respect to (or consummate) an acquisition proposal for 50% or more of our stock or assets.
In addition, if the Progenics Transaction is not completed, we could be subject to litigation related to any failure to complete the Progenics Transaction or related to any enforcement proceeding commenced against us to perform our obligations under the Merger Agreement. If any such risk materializes, it could adversely impact our ongoing business. Similarly, delays in the completion of the Progenics Transaction could, among other things, result in additional transaction costs, loss of revenue or other negative effects associated with uncertainty about completion of the Progenics Transaction and cause us not to realize some or all of the benefits that we expect to achieve if the Progenics Transaction is successfully completed within its expected timeframe. We cannot assure you that the conditions to the closing of the Progenics Transaction will be satisfied or waived or that the Progenics Transaction will be consummated.
We and Progenics are each subject to business uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the Progenics Transaction is pending, which could adversely affect the business and operations of us or the combined company.
In connection with the pendency of the Progenics Transaction, it is possible that some customers, suppliers and other persons with whom we or Progenics has a business relationship may delay or defer certain business decisions or might decide to seek to terminate, change or renegotiate their relationships with us or Progenics, as the case may be, as a result of the Progenics Transaction, which could negatively affect our current or the combined company’s future revenues, earnings and cash flows, as well as the market price of our common stock, regardless of whether the Progenics Transaction is completed. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, we and Progenics are each subject to certain restrictions on the conduct of our businesses prior to completing the Progenics Transaction, which could adversely affect each party’s ability to execute certain of its business strategies. Such limitations could adversely affect each party’s business and operations prior to the completion of the Progenics Transaction. Each of the risks described above may be exacerbated by delays or other adverse developments with respect to the completion of the Progenics Transaction.
Uncertainties associated with the Progenics Transaction may cause a loss of management personnel and other key employees, and we and Progenics may have difficulty attracting and motivating management personnel and other key employees, which could adversely affect the future business and operations of the combined company.
We and Progenics are each dependent on the experience and industry knowledge of our respective management personnel and other key employees to execute our business plans. The combined company’s success after the completion of the Progenics Transaction will depend in part upon the ability of each of us and Progenics to attract, motivate and retain key management personnel and other key employees. Prior to completion of the Progenics Transaction, current and prospective employees of each of us and Progenics may experience uncertainty about their roles within the combined company following the completion of the Progenics Transaction, which may have an adverse effect on the ability of each of us and Progenics to attract, motivate or retain management personnel and other key employees. In addition, no assurance can be given that the combined company will be able to attract, motivate or retain management personnel and other key employees of each of us and Progenics to the same extent that we and Progenics have previously been able to attract or retain their own employees.
The Progenics Transaction is subject to the expiration or termination of applicable waiting periods and the receipt of approvals, consents or clearances from regulatory authorities that may impose conditions that could have an adverse effect on us or the combined company or, if not obtained, could prevent completion of the Progenics Transaction.
Before the Progenics Transaction may be completed, any approvals, consents or clearances required in connection with the Progenics Transaction must have been obtained, in each case, under applicable law. Consummation of the Progenics Transaction is conditioned upon, among other things, the expiration or termination of the waiting period (and any extensions thereof) applicable to the Progenics Transaction under the HSR Act, which has been obtained by grant of early termination of the HSR Act waiting period on October 25, 2019. Notwithstanding the grant of early termination, at any time before or after the Progenics Transaction is consummated, the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission or U.S. state attorneys general could take action under the antitrust laws in opposition to the Progenics Transaction, including seeking to enjoin completion of the Progenics Transaction, condition completion of the Progenics Transaction upon the divestiture of assets, or impose restrictions on post-merger operations. Any such requirements or restrictions may prevent or delay completion of the Progenics Transaction or may reduce the anticipated benefits of the Progenics Transaction.
The Merger Agreement limits our ability to pursue alternatives to the merger and may discourage other companies from trying to acquire us.
The Merger Agreement contains a “no solicitation” covenant that restricts our ability to solicit, initiate, seek or support, or knowingly encourage or facilitate, any inquiries or proposals with respect to certain acquisition proposal relating to the Company; engage or participate in negotiations with respect to any acquisition proposal; provide a third party confidential information with respect to, or have or participate in any discussions with, any person relating to any acquisition proposals; or enter into any acquisition agreement with respect to certain unsolicited proposals relating to an acquisition proposal. In the event we receive an unsolicited acquisition proposal, we must promptly communicate the receipt of such proposal and provide copies of material communications and information, including the terms and conditions of such proposal, to the other party. If, in response to such proposals and subject to certain conditions, we intend to effect a change in our board of directors’ recommendation to stockholders, we must provide Progenics an opportunity to offer to modify the terms of the Merger Agreement in response to such competing acquisition proposal before our board may withdraw or qualify its respective recommendation. The Merger Agreement further provides that in the event of a termination of the Merger Agreement under certain specified circumstances, including a termination by Progenics following a change in recommendation by our board or a willful and material breach of the no-solicitation provision applicable to us, we may be required to pay Progenics a termination fee equal to $18,340,000.
These provisions could discourage a potential third-party acquirer that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant portion of the Company from considering or proposing that acquisition, even if it were prepared to pay consideration with a higher per share cash or total value than the total value proposed to be paid in the merger. These provisions might also result in a potential third-party acquirer proposing to pay a lower price in an acquisition proposal than it might otherwise have proposed to pay because of the added expense of the termination fee and other fees and expenses that may become payable in certain circumstances.
Current stockholders will have a reduced ownership and voting interest in the Company after the Progenics Transaction and will exercise less influence over the management of the combined company.
Upon completion of the Progenics Transaction, we expect to issue approximately 26.9 million shares of our common stock to Progenics stockholders. As a result, it is expected that, immediately after completion of the Progenics Transaction, former Progenics stockholders will own approximately 40% of our outstanding shares of common stock. In addition, shares of our common stock may be issued from time to time following the Progenics Transaction to holders of Progenics equity awards on the terms set forth in the Merger Agreement. Consequently, our current stockholders in the aggregate will have less influence over the management and policies of the Company than they currently have.
We and Progenics may be targets of securities class action and derivative lawsuits that could result in substantial costs and may delay or prevent the Progenics Transaction from being completed.
Securities class action lawsuits and derivative lawsuits are often brought against public companies that have entered into merger agreements. As of the date of filing of this report, six securities class action lawsuits have been filed against Progenics and its board of directors alleging inadequate disclosure by Progenics under the Registration Statement on Form S-4 related to the Progenics Transaction (which registration statement will be revised to describe, among other things, the revised terms in the Amended Merger Agreement). Two of those lawsuits against Progenics also name us or one of our affiliates as defendants, although we do not believe that those lawsuits have merit or will result in any material monetary damages payable by us. Even if lawsuits are without merit, defending against any legal claims can result in substantial costs and divert management time and resources. An adverse judgment in a securities class action lawsuit or derivative lawsuit alleging significant monetary loss by the plaintiffs could result in monetary damages for us and Progenics, which could have a negative impact on our and Progenics’ respective liquidity and financial condition. Additionally, if a plaintiff is successful in obtaining an injunction prohibiting completion of the Progenics Transaction, then that injunction may delay or prevent the Progenics Transaction from being completed, or from being completed within the expected timeframe, which may adversely affect our business, financial position and results of operation.
Completion of the Progenics Transaction may trigger change in control or other provisions in certain agreements to which Progenics or its subsidiaries are a party, which may have an adverse impact on the combined company’s business and results of operations.
The completion of the Progenics Transaction may trigger change in control and other provisions in certain agreements to which Progenics or its subsidiaries are a party. If we and Progenics are unable to negotiate waivers of those provisions, the counterparties may exercise their rights and remedies under the agreements, potentially terminating the agreements or seeking monetary damages. Even if we and Progenics are able to negotiate waivers, the counterparties may require a fee for such waivers or seek to renegotiate the agreements on terms less favorable to Progenics or the combined company. Any of the foregoing or similar developments may have an adverse impact on the combined company’s business and results of operations.
Progenics stockholders have appraisal rights under Delaware law.
Under Delaware law, Progenics stockholders who do not vote in favor of adoption of the Amended Merger Agreement and who otherwise properly perfect their rights will be entitled to “appraisal rights” in connection with the Progenics Transaction, which generally entitle stockholders to receive, in lieu of the merger consideration, a cash payment of an amount determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery to be equal to the fair value of their Progenics common stock as of the effective time of the merger. The appraised value would be determined by the Court of Chancery and could be less than, the same as, or more than the merger consideration. Under Delaware law, stockholders are generally entitled to statutory interest on an appraisal award at a rate equal to 5% above the Federal Reserve discount rate compounded quarterly from the closing date of the merger until the award is actually paid. Stockholders who have properly demanded appraisal rights must file a petition for appraisal with the Court of Chancery within 120 days after the effective date of the merger. Should a material number of Progenics stockholders exercise appraisal rights and should the Court determine that the fair value of such shares of Progenics common stock is materially greater than the merger consideration, we will be required to pay significantly more than anticipated in connection with the Progenics Transaction, which could adversely affect the liquidity and financial condition of the combined company.
The combined company may be unable to successfully integrate the Progenics business into our business and realize the anticipated benefits of the Progenics Transaction.
The success of the Progenics Transaction will depend, in part, on the combined company’s ability to successfully combine the business of Progenics with our business, which currently operate as independent public companies, and realize the anticipated benefits, including synergies, cost savings, innovation and operational efficiencies and revenue growth from the combination. If the combined company is unable to achieve these objectives within the anticipated time frame, or at all, the anticipated benefits may not be realized fully or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected and the value of its common stock may be harmed. Additionally, as a result of the Progenics Transaction, rating agencies may take negative actions against the combined company's credit ratings, which may increase the combined company’s financing costs.
The Progenics Transaction involves the integration of Progenics’ business into our existing business, which is expected to be a complex, costly and time-consuming process. We and Progenics have not previously completed a transaction comparable in size or scope to the Progenics Transaction. The integration may result in material challenges, including, without limitation:
The diversion of management’s attention from ongoing business concerns and performance shortfalls at one or both of the companies as a result of the devotion of management’s attention to the Progenics Transaction;
Managing a larger combined company;
Maintaining employee morale and attracting, motivating and retaining management personnel and other key employees;
Unanticipated risks to our integration plan including in connection with timing, talent, and the potential need for additional resources;
New or previously unidentified manufacturing, regulatory, or research and development issues in the Progenics business;
Retaining existing business and operational relationships and attracting new business and operational relationships;
Integrating corporate and administrative infrastructures in geographically separate organizations and eliminating duplicative expenses;
Unanticipated issues in integrating information technology, communications and other systems;
Unanticipated changes in federal or state laws or regulations; and
Unforeseen expenses or delays associated with the Progenics Transaction.
Many of these factors will be outside of the combined company’s control and any one of them could result in delays, increased costs, decreases in the amount of expected revenues and diversion of management’s time and energy, which could materially affect the combined company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. We and Progenics have operated, and until completion of the Progenics Transaction will continue to operate, independently. We and Progenics are currently permitted to conduct only limited planning for the integration of the two companies following the Progenics Transaction and have not yet determined the exact nature of how the businesses and operations of the two companies will be combined after the combination. The actual integration of Progenics with our business may result in additional or unforeseen expenses, and the anticipated benefits of the integration plan may not be realized. These integration matters could have an adverse effect on (i) each of us and Progenics during this transition period and (ii) the combined company for an undetermined period after completion of the Progenics Transaction. In addition, any actual cost savings of the Progenics Transaction could be less than anticipated.
The future results of the combined company may be adversely impacted if the combined company does not effectively manage its expanded operations following the completion of the Progenics Transaction.
Following the completion of the Progenics Transaction, the size of the combined company’s business will be significantly larger than the current size of our business. The combined company’s ability to successfully manage this expanded business will depend, in part, upon management’s ability to design and implement strategic initiatives that address not only the integration of two independent stand-alone companies, but also the increased scale and scope of the combined business with its associated increased costs and complexity. The combined company may not be successful or may not realize the expected operating efficiencies, cost savings and other benefits currently anticipated from the Progenics Transaction.
The CVRs we will issue as part of the Progenics Transaction may result in substantial future payments and could divert the attention of our management.
As part of the consideration for the Progenics Transaction, we will issue CVRs to the stockholders of Progenics and holders of in-the-money Progenics equity awards entitling them to future cash payments of 40% of PyL net sales over $100 million in 2022 and over $150 million in 2023. These payments could be substantial and could adversely impact our liquidity. In addition, we are obligated to exercise a level of effort, expertise and resources consistent with those normally used in a medical diagnostics business similar to our size and resources with respect to developing, seeking regulatory approval for and commercializing a product of similar market potential at a similar stage in its development or product life to PyL. We are also required to produce net sales statements for PyL that may be reviewed and challenged by CVR holders, with any disagreement to be resolved by an independent accountant. These requirements could divert management time and resources and result in additional costs.
The financial analyses and forecasts considered by Lantheus Holdings and Progenics and their respective financial advisors may not be realized, which may adversely affect the market price of, Lantheus Holdings common stock followingand the completionvoting and other rights of the merger.holders of, our common stock. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for stockholders to elect directors other than the candidates nominated by our board of directors. In addition, we are incorporated in
In performing their financial analyses
Delaware and rendering their opinions related to the merger, each of the respective financial advisors to Lantheus Holdings and Progenics relied on, among other things, internal stand-alone financial analyses and forecasts as separately provided by Lantheus Holdings and Progenics. These analyses and forecasts were prepared by, or as directed by, the management of Lantheus Holdings or the management of Progenics, as applicable. None of these analyses or forecasts were prepared with a view towards public disclosure or compliance with the published guidelines of the SEC, the U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. These projections are inherently based on various estimates and assumptions that are subject to the judgmentprovisions of those preparing them.Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which may prohibit large stockholders from consummating a merger with, or acquisition of, us. These projections are also subjectprovisions may deter an acquisition of us that might otherwise be attractive to significant economic, competitive, industrystockholders.
Certain provisions in the Notes and other uncertainties and contingencies, all of which arethe Indenture could make it more difficult or impossiblemore expensive for a third party to predict and many of which are beyond the control of Lantheus Holdings and Progenics. There can be no assurance that Lantheus Holdings’ or Progenics’ financial condition or results of operations will be consistent with those set forth in such analyses and forecasts, which could have an adverse impact on the market price of Lantheus Holdings common stock or the financial positionacquire us. For example, if a takeover would constitute a fundamental change, holders of the combined company followingNotes will have the merger.
The combined company is expectedright to incur substantial expenses relatedrequire us to repurchase their Notes in cash. In addition, if a takeover constitutes a make-whole fundamental change, we may be required to increase the completion of the Progenics Transaction and the integration of the Progenics business with our business.
The combined company is expected to incur substantial expensesconversion rate for holders who convert their Notes in connection with such takeover. In either case, and in other cases, our obligations under the completion of the Progenics Transaction, including seeking approval from our stockholders,Notes and the integration of the Progenics business with our business. There are a large number of processes, policies, procedures, operations, technologies and systems that must be integrated, including purchasing, accounting and finance, sales, payroll, pricing, revenue management, marketing and benefits. The substantial majority of these costs will be non-recurring expenses related to the Progenics Transaction, facilities and systems consolidation costs. The combined company may incur additional costs to maintain employee morale and to attract, motivate or retain management personnel or key employees. We will also incur transaction fees and costs related to formulating integration plans for the combined business, and the execution of these plans may lead to additional unanticipated costs. Additionally, as a result of the Progenics Transaction, rating agencies may take negative actions with regard to the combined company’s credit ratings, which mayIndenture could increase the combined company’s financing costs. These incrementalcost of acquiring us or otherwise discourage a third party from acquiring us or removing incumbent management, including in a transaction and acquisition-related coststhat holders of our common stock may exceed the savings the combined company expects to achieve from the elimination of duplicative costs and the realization of other efficiencies related to the integration of the businesses, particularly in the near term and in the event there are material unanticipated costs.view as favorable.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
The following table summarizes information regarding our significant leased and owned properties, as of December 31, 2019:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Location | | Purpose | | SegmentSquare
Footage | | Square
Footage
Ownership | | Ownership | | Lease Term
End
|
| U.S. | | | | | | | | | | |
North Billerica, Massachusetts | | Corporate Headquarters, Manufacturing, Laboratory, Mixed Use and Other Office Space | | U.S. Segment431,000 | | 431,000 |
Owned | | Owned | | N/A |
CanadaBedford, Massachusetts | | Executive Offices, Office Space | | 46,500 | | | Leased | | | June 2031 |
QuebecNew York, New York | | Office Space | | 26,000 | | | Leased* | | September 2030 |
| Somerset, New Jersey | | Manufacturing, Mixed Use and Office Space | | International
Segment11,400 | | 1,106 |
Leased | | Leased | | April 2020November 2028 |
QuebecSomerset, New Jersey | | Office Space | | 8,249 | | | Leased | | March 2027 |
| | | | | | | | |
| Canada | | | | | | | | |
| Quebec | | Mixed Use and Office Space | | 1,106 | | | Leased | | May 2023 |
| Quebec | | Distribution Center and Office Space | | International
Segment1,433 | | 1,433 |
Leased | | Leased | | May 20222023 |
Puerto RicoSweden | | | | | | | | | | |
San JuanLund | | Manufacturing, Laboratory, Mixed Use and Office Space | | International
Segment4,000 | | 9,550 |
Leased | | Leased | | OctoberDecember 2024 |
* On October 11, 2021, we entered into an agreement to sublease our office space at the World Trade Center in New York City to an unrelated third party. Please refer to Note 17, “Leases” for further details.
We believe all of these facilities are well-maintained and suitable for the office, radiopharmacy, manufacturing or warehouse operations conducted in them and provide adequate capacity for current and foreseeable future needs.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
From timeInformation with respect to time, we are a party to variouscertain legal proceedings arisingis included in the ordinary course of business. In addition, we have in the past been,Note 20, “Commitments and may in the future be, subjectContingencies”, to investigations by governmental and regulatory authorities which expose us to greater risks associated with litigation, regulatory or other proceedings, as a result of which we could be required to pay significant fines or penalties. The costs and outcome of litigation, regulatory or other proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, and some lawsuits, claims, actions or proceedings may be disposed of unfavorably to us. In addition, intellectual property disputes often have a risk of injunctive relief which, if imposed against us, could materially and adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.
In October 2019, we were awarded a total of approximately $3.5 million, consisting of damages, pre-judgment interest, and certain arbitration fees, compensation and expenses in our arbitration with Pharmalucence in connection with a Manufacturing and Supply Agreement dated November 12, 2013, under which Pharmalucence agreed to manufacture and supply DEFINITY for us. The commercial arrangement contemplated by that agreement was repeatedly delayed and ultimately never successfully realized. After extended settlement discussions between Sun Pharma, the ultimate parent of Pharmalucence, and us, which did not lead to a mutually acceptable outcome, on November 10, 2017, we filed an arbitration demand (and later an amended arbitration demand) with the American Arbitration Association against Pharmalucence, alleging breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, tortious misrepresentation and violation of the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Law, also known as Chapter 93A. In November 2019, we received proceeds of approximately $3.5 million, which we recorded in other expense (income) in the consolidated statement of operations.financial statements contained in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, and is incorporated herein by reference.
As of December 31, 2019, except as disclosed above we had no material ongoing litigation in which we were a party. In addition, we had no material ongoing regulatory or other proceeding and no knowledge of any investigations by governmental or regulatory authorities in which we are a target, in either case that we believe could have a material and adverse effect on our current business.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
The Company’sOur common stock began tradingtrades on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “LNTH” on June 25, 2015. Prior to that time, there was no established public trading market for our common stock..
Holders of Record
On February 19, 2020,16, 2023, there were approximately 831 stockholders of record of our common stock. This number does not include stockholders for whom shares are held in “nominee” or “street” name.
Performance Graph
The performance graph set forth below shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC. This graph will not be deemed “incorporated by reference” into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether such filing occurs before or after the date hereof, except to the extent that the Companywe explicitly incorporatesincorporate it by reference into in such filing.
The following graph provides a comparison of the cumulative total shareholder return on our common shares with that of the cumulative total shareholder return on the (i) Russell 2000 Index, and (ii) the NASDAQ US Small Cap Index and (iii) the NASDAQ US Mid Cap Index, commencing on June 25, 2015December 31, 2017 and ending December 31, 2019.2022. The graph assumes a hypothetical $100 investment in our common stock and in each of the comparative indices on June 25, 2015.December 31, 2017. Our historic share price performance is not necessarily indicative of future share price performance.
* Assumes hypothetical investment of $100 in our common stock and each of the indices on June 25, 2015, the date of our IPO,December 31, 2017, including reinvestment of dividends.
Performance Graph Data
The following table sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on the hypothetical $100 investment in the Company’sour common stock and each of the comparative indices on June 25, 2015:December 31, 2017:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Date | | Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (“LNTH”) | | Russell 2000 Index (“^RUT”) | | NASDAQ US Small Cap Index (“^NQUSS”) | | NASDAQ US Mid Cap Index (“^NQUSM”) |
| 12/31/17 | | $ | 100.00 | | | $ | 100.00 | | | $ | 100.00 | | | $ | 100.00 | |
| 12/31/18 | | $ | 76.53 | | | $ | 87.82 | | | $ | 88.01 | | | $ | 88.59 | |
| 12/31/19 | | $ | 100.29 | | | $ | 108.66 | | | $ | 107.70 | | | $ | 112.26 | |
| 12/31/20 | | $ | 65.97 | | | $ | 128.61 | | | $ | 130.82 | | | $ | 128.79 | |
| 12/31/21 | | $ | 141.27 | | | $ | 146.23 | | | $ | 151.89 | | | $ | 152.08 | |
| 12/31/22 | | $ | 249.19 | | | $ | 114.70 | | | $ | 118.32 | | | $ | 124.00 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Date | | Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (“LNTH”) | | Russell 2000 Index (“^RUT”) | | NASDAQ US Small Cap Index (“^NQUSS”) |
| 06/25/15 | | $ | 100.00 |
| | $ | 100.00 |
| | $ | 100.00 |
|
| 12/31/15 | | $ | 49.93 |
| | $ | 88.26 |
| | $ | 88.24 |
|
| 12/31/16 | | $ | 127.03 |
| | $ | 105.45 |
| | $ | 107.67 |
|
| 12/31/17 | | $ | 302.07 |
| | $ | 119.31 |
| | $ | 122.28 |
|
| 12/31/18 | | $ | 231.17 |
| | $ | 104.79 |
| | $ | 107.62 |
|
| 12/31/19 | | $ | 302.95 |
| | $ | 129.64 |
| | $ | 131.70 |
|
Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities
None.
Dividend Policy
We did not declare or pay any dividends in 2022, and we do not currently intend to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. We currently expect to retain future earnings, if any, for the foreseeable future, to finance the growth and development of our business and to repay indebtedness. Our ability to pay dividends is restricted by our financing arrangements. See Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—External Sources of Liquidity” for further information.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.On December 8, 2023, pursuant to a Purchase Agreement among us, LMI, as Guarantor, and BofA Securities, Inc. and SVB Securities LLC, as representatives of the several initial purchasers therein, we issued $575.0 million in aggregate principal amount of Notes due 2027. The Notes and the shares of our common stock into which the Notes are convertible will not be registered under the Securities Act, in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.
RepurchasesIssuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table presents information with respect to purchases of common stock we made during the quarterthree months ended December 31, 2019. The Company does not currently have a share2022. In December 2022, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase programof up to $150.0 million in effect.aggregate amount of our common stock under certain circumstances. We used approximately $75.0 million of the net proceeds from the Notes to repurchase shares of our common stock from purchasers of the Notes in privately negotiated transactions effected with or through one of the initial purchasers or its affiliate. The 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, adopted by the Companyus on June 24, 2015, as amended on April 26, 2016 and as further amended on April 27, 2017, and April 24, 2019, April 28, 2021 and April 28, 2022 (the “2015 Plan”), provides for the withholding of shares to satisfy minimum statutory tax withholding obligations. It does not specify a maximum number of shares that can be withheld for this purpose. The shares of common stock withheld to satisfy minimum tax withholding obligations may be deemed to be “issuer purchases” of shares that are required to be disclosed pursuant to this Item 5. These shares are then sold in compliance with Rule 10b5-1 into the market to allow the Company to satisfy the tax withholding requirements in cash.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Programs | | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program |
| October 2022 ** | | 2,519 | | | $ | 71.53 | | | * | | * |
| November 2022 ** | | 3,373 | | | $ | 59.05 | | | * | | * |
| December 2022 *** | | 1,343,056 | | | $ | 56.00 | | | 1,339,046 | | | * |
| Total | | 1,348,948 | | | | | 1,339,046 | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Programs | | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program |
| October 2019 ** | | 735 |
| | $ | 18.83 |
| | * | | * |
| November 2019 ** | | 1,149 |
| | $ | 21.29 |
| | * | | * |
| December 2019 ** | | 243 |
| | $ | 20.60 |
| | * | | * |
| Total | | 2,127 |
| | | | * | | |
* These amounts are not applicable as the Company doeswe did not have a share repurchase program in effect.
** Reflects shares withheld to satisfy minimum statutory tax withholding amounts due from employees related to the receipt of stock which resulted from the exercise for vesting of equity awards.
*** Includes 4,010 shares withheld to satisfy minimum statutory tax withholding amounts due from employees related to the receipt of stock which resulted from the exercise for vesting of equity awards. Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensations Plans
The information required with respect to this item is incorporated herein by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement for our 20202023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the close of our year ended December 31, 2019.
2022.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data[Reserved]
58
Basis of Financial Information
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in U.S. Dollars, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Selected Financial Data
In the table below, we provide you with our selected consolidated financial data for the periods presented. We have prepared this information using our audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015.
The following selected consolidated financial information should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, the related notes and Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results indicated below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any future period. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Statement of Operations | (in thousands, except per share data) |
| Revenues | $ | 347,337 |
| | $ | 343,374 |
| | $ | 331,378 |
| | $ | 301,853 |
| | $ | 293,461 |
|
| Cost of goods sold | 172,526 |
| | 168,489 |
| | 169,243 |
| | 164,073 |
| | 157,939 |
|
| Sales and marketing | 41,888 |
| | 43,159 |
| | 42,315 |
| | 36,542 |
| | 34,740 |
|
| General and administrative | 61,244 |
| | 50,167 |
| | 49,842 |
| | 38,832 |
| | 43,894 |
|
| Research and development | 20,018 |
| | 17,071 |
| | 18,125 |
| | 12,203 |
| | 14,358 |
|
| Gain on sales of assets | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,385 |
| | — |
|
| Operating income | 51,661 |
| | 64,488 |
| | 51,853 |
| | 56,588 |
| | 42,530 |
|
| Interest expense | 13,617 |
| | 17,405 |
| | 18,410 |
| | 26,618 |
| | 38,715 |
|
| Debt retirement costs | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,896 |
| | — |
|
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | 3,196 |
| | — |
| | 2,442 |
| | — |
| | 15,528 |
|
| Other expense (income) | 6,221 |
| | (2,465 | ) | | (8,638 | ) | | (220 | ) | | 65 |
|
| Income (loss) before income taxes | 28,627 |
| | 49,548 |
| | 39,639 |
| | 28,294 |
| | (11,778 | ) |
Income tax (benefit) expense(a) | (3,040 | ) | | 9,030 |
| | (83,746 | ) | | 1,532 |
| | 2,968 |
|
| Net income (loss) | $ | 31,667 |
| | $ | 40,518 |
| | $ | 123,385 |
| | $ | 26,762 |
| | $ | (14,746 | ) |
| Net income (loss) per common share: | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 0.81 |
| | $ | 1.06 |
| | $ | 3.31 |
| | $ | 0.84 |
| | $ | (0.60 | ) |
| Diluted | $ | 0.79 |
| | $ | 1.03 |
| | $ | 3.17 |
| | $ | 0.82 |
| | $ | (0.60 | ) |
| Weighted-average common shares: | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | 38,988 |
| | 38,233 |
| | 37,276 |
| | 32,044 |
| | 24,440 |
|
| Diluted | 40,113 |
| | 39,501 |
| | 38,892 |
| | 32,656 |
| | 24,440 |
|
(a) The 2017 amount reflects the release of our valuation allowance of $141.1 million against its deferred tax assets offset by a provision of $45.1
million for remeasuring the Company’s deferred tax assets for the change in tax rates enacted under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Balance Sheet Data | (in thousands) |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 92,919 |
| | $ | 113,401 |
| | $ | 76,290 |
| | $ | 51,178 |
| | $ | 28,596 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 405,919 |
| | $ | 439,831 |
| | $ | 383,858 |
| | $ | 255,898 |
| | $ | 242,379 |
|
| Long-term debt, net | $ | 183,927 |
| | $ | 263,709 |
| | $ | 265,393 |
| | $ | 274,460 |
| | $ | 349,858 |
|
| Total liabilities | $ | 291,318 |
| | $ | 368,829 |
| | $ | 360,567 |
| | $ | 362,414 |
| | $ | 427,668 |
|
| Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) | $ | 114,601 |
| | $ | 71,002 |
| | $ | 23,291 |
| | $ | (106,516 | ) | | $ | (185,289 | ) |
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with Item 6, “Selected Financial Data” and the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements related to future events and our future financial performance that are based on current expectations and subject to risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those set forth in Part I—Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements.” included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
This section discusses 2022 and 2021 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2022 and 2021. Discussions of 2020 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2021 and 2020 have been excluded from this Form 10-K and can be found in “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, filed with the SEC on February 24, 2022. Overview
Our Business
With more than 65 years of experience in delivering life-changing science, we are committed to improving patient outcomes through diagnostics, radiotherapeutics and artificial intelligence solutions that enable clinicians to Find, Fight and Follow disease. We classify our products in three categories: Precision Diagnostics, Radiopharmaceutical Oncology, and Strategic Partnerships and Other Revenue. Our leading Precision Diagnostic products assist healthcare professionals (“HCPs”) Find and Follow diseases, with a focus in cardiology. Our Radiopharmaceutical Oncology diagnostics and therapeutics help HCPs Find, Fight and Follow cancer. Our Strategic Partnerships focus on enabling precision medicine through the use of biomarkers, digital solutions and pharma services platforms, and also includes our license of RELISTOR to Bausch Health Companies, Inc. (“Bausch”).
Our commercial products are used by oncologists, urologists, nuclear medicine physicians, cardiologists, sonographers, technologists, radiologists, and internal medicine physicians working in a global leader in the development, manufacture and commercializationvariety of innovative diagnostic medical imaging agents and products that assist clinicians in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular and other diseases. Clinicians use our imaging agents and products across a range of imaging modalities, including echocardiography and nuclear imaging.clinical settings. We believe that the resultingour diagnostic products provide improved diagnostic information that enables healthcare providersHCPs to better detect and characterize, or rule out, disease, potentially achieving improvedwith the potential to achieve better patient outcomes, reducingreduce patient risk and limitinglimit overall costs for payers andthroughout the entire healthcare system.
Our commercialWe produce and market our products are used by cardiologists, nuclear physicians, radiologists, internal medicine physicians, technologiststhroughout the United States (the “U.S.”), selling primarily to hospitals, independent diagnostic testing facilities, government facilities, integrated delivery networks, radiopharmacies, clinics, and sonographers working in a variety of clinical settings.group practices. We sell our products to radiopharmacies, integrated delivery networks, hospitals, clinics and group practices.
We sell our products globally and operate our business in two reportable segments, which are further described below:
U.S. Segment produces and markets our medical imaging agents and products throughoutoutside the U.S. In the U.S., we primarily sell our products to radiopharmacies, integrated delivery networks, hospitals, clinics and group practices.
International Segment operations consistthrough a combination of production and distribution activities in Puerto Rico and some direct distribution activities in Canada. Additionally, within our International Segment, we have establishedCanada and maintain third-partythird party distribution relationships under which our products are marketed and sold in Europe, Canada, Australia, Asia-Pacific, Central America and LatinSouth America.
Our Product Portfolioexecutive offices are located in Bedford, Massachusetts, with additional offices in North Billerica, Massachusetts, Somerset, New Jersey, Montreal, Canada and Lund, Sweden.
Our
Recent Developments
Exclusive License for PNT2002 and PNT2003
On December 20, 2022, we announced the closing of a set of strategic collaborations with POINT Biopharma Global Inc. (“POINT”), in which we were granted a license to exclusive worldwide rights (excluding Japan, South Korea, China (including Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan), Singapore and Indonesia) to co-develop and commercialize POINT’s PNT2002 and PNT2003 product portfolio includes an ultrasound contrast agent, nuclear imaging productscandidates.
With respect to PNT2002, POINT is generally responsible for funding and a radiotherapeutic product. Our principal products include the following:
DEFINITY is a microbubble contrast agent used in ultrasound examsdevelopment activities required for FDA approval of the heart, also known as echocardiography exams. DEFINITY contains perflutren-containing lipid microspheresPNT2002, including generating all clinical and is indicated in the U.S. for use in patients with suboptimal echocardiograms to assist in imaging the left ventricular chamber and left endocardial border of the heart in ultrasound procedures.
TechneLite is a Tc-99m generator that provides the essential nuclear material used by radiopharmacies to radiolabel Cardiolite, Neurolitenonclinical data, analysis and other Tc-99m-based radiopharmaceuticals used in nuclear medicine procedures. TechneLite uses Mo-99 as its active ingredient.
Sales of our microbubble contrast agent, DEFINITY,information, and we are made in the U.S.responsible for preparing for and Canada through a DEFINITY direct sales team. In the U.S., our nuclear imaging products, including TechneLite, Xenon, Neurolite and Cardiolite, are primarily distributed through commercial radiopharmacies, the majority of which are controlled by or associated with GE Healthcare, Cardinal, UPPI, Jubilant Radiopharma and PharmaLogic. A small portion of our nuclear imaging product sales in the U.S. are made through our direct sales force to hospitals and clinics that maintain their own in-house radiopharmaceutical preparation capabilities. We own one radiopharmacy in Puerto Rico, where we sell our own productsseeking regulatory approval for PNT2002, as well as productsperforming and funding all future development and commercialization of third partiesPNT2002 following such approval. POINT will be responsible for all manufacturing of PNT2002, subject to end-users.certain exceptions described in the PNT2002 License Agreement.
We also maintainWith respect to PNT2003, POINT is responsible for curating all data, analysis and other information necessary for regulatory approval, and supporting us in the preparation of regulatory filings for PNT2003, and we are responsible for preparing for and seeking regulatory approval of all such applications, as well as performing and funding all future development and commercialization of PNT2003 following such approval. POINT will be responsible for all manufacturing of PNT2003, subject to certain exceptions described in the PNT2003 License Agreement.
For more information, see Note 22, “Acquisition of Assets” in our own direct sales force in Canada for certainconsolidated financial statements included herein.
Acquisition of our products. In Europe, Australia, Asia-Pacific and Latin America, we generally rely on third-party distributors to market, sell and distribute our nuclear imaging and contrast agent products, either on a country-by-country basis or on a multi-country regional basis.Cerveau Technologies, Inc.
On October 1, 2019,February 6, 2023, we entered into the Initial Merger Agreement to acquire Progenicsannounced that we acquired Cerveau Technologies, Inc. (“Cerveau”). Cerveau’s asset is MK-6240, a second-generation F 18-labeled PET imaging agent that targets Tau tangles in an all-stock transaction.Alzheimer’s disease that will expand our Pharma Services business. Under the terms of the Initial Merger Agreement,agreement, we agreedpaid an upfront payment of $35 million and potentially will pay additional development and commercial milestone payments. Additionally, we will pay double-digit royalty payments for research revenue and commercial sales. Research revenue is derived from existing partnerships with pharmaceutical companies that use the imaging agent in clinical trials and includes milestone and dose-related payments. Pursuant to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of Progenics common stock at a fixed exchange ratio. Progenics stockholders would have received 0.2502 shares of our common stock for each share of Progenics common stock, representing an approximately 35% aggregate ownership stake in the combined company. The transaction
contemplated by the Initial Merger Agreement was unanimously approved by the Boards of Directors of both companies and was subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Initial Merger Agreement, including, among other things, the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock of Progenics and a majority of votes cast by the holders of the common stock of the Company.
On February 20, 2020, we entered into the Amended Merger Agreement with Progenics, which amends and restates the Initial Merger Agreement. Under the terms of the Amended Merger Agreement, Lantheusstock purchase agreement, the seller will acquire all of the issuedalso provide transition and outstanding shares of Progenics common stock atclinical development services for a fixed exchange ratio whereby Progenics stockholders will receive, for each share of Progenics stock held at theprescribed time offollowing the closing of the merger, 0.31transaction.
Refinancing of 2019 Facility
In December 2022, we refinanced our existing credit facility, consisting of (i) a share$200.0 million five-year term loan facility (the “2019 Term Facility”) and (ii) a $200.0 million five-year revolving credit facility (the “2019 Revolving Facility” and, together with the 2019 Term Facility, the “2019 Facility”), with a new $100.0 million delayed draw term loan facility (the “2022 Term Facility” and, the loans thereunder, the “Term Loans”) and a new $350.0 million five-year revolving credit facility (the “2022 Revolving Facility” and, together with the 2022 Term Facility, the “2022 Facility”).
We used approximately $7.8 million of our common stock, increased from 0.2502cash on hand to primarily repay the principal amount of the loans outstanding related to the 2019 Facility through the nine months ended September 30, 2022. In addition, we used approximately $167.6 million of cash on hand to repay in full the aggregate remaining principal amount of the loans outstanding under the Initial Merger Agreement, together with2019 Facility and to pay related interest, transaction fees and expenses.
While the 2022 Term Facility allowed for a non-tradeable CVR tieddelayed draw term loan, the loan was not drawn upon. We recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.6 million related to the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs and debt discounts associated with the 2019 Term Facility. In addition, we incurred and capitalized $2.7 million of new deferred financing costs related to the refinancing.
Issuance of Convertible Notes
On December 8, 2022, we issued $575.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 2.625% Convertible Senior Notes due 2027 (the “Notes”), which includes $75.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the Notes sold pursuant to the full exercise of the initial purchasers’ option to purchase additional Notes. The Notes were issued under an indenture, dated as of December 8, 2022 (the “Indenture”), among the Company, LMI, as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank, as Trustee. The net proceeds from the issuance of the Notes were approximately $557.8 million, after deducting the initial purchasers’ discounts and offering expenses payable by us.
Key Factors Affecting Our Results
Our 2022 and 2021 financial performances reflect full year results of the Progenics business, whereas the year ended December 31, 2020 only incorporates results since the June 19, 2020 closing date of the Progenics Acquisition.
Our business and financial performance have been, and continue to be, affected by the following:
Continued Growth of PyL, suchPYLARIFY
On May 27, 2021, we announced that each CVR will entitlethe FDA had approved PYLARIFY, an F 18-labeled PET imaging agent targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (“PSMA”). PYLARIFY is a product in our Radiopharmaceutical Oncology product category. We commercially launched PYLARIFY in the U.S. in June 2021. As of December 31, 2022, we had activated 37 PMF manufacturing sites in our PMF network, up from 21 activated sites as of December 31, 2021. These additional sites provide geographic breadth, out-the-door time flexibility and added optionality within our existing PMF network. Overall, we have achieved broad national distribution of PYLARIFY with customers in 46 of 50 states, including the District of Columbia.
In March 2022, we announced a strategic collaboration with Novartis AG (“Novartis”) to include PYLARIFY in prostate cancer trials with PLUVICTO, Novartis’ approved PSMA-targeted therapeutic. In addition, in 2022, we entered into an agreement with Curium to add PYLARIFY to its holderPSMA-targeted therapeutic clinical trial referred to by Curium as ECLIPSE. Both of these collaborations, as well as other collaborations using PYLARIFY are described further under Part I, Item 1. “Business - Strategic Partnerships and Other Revenue – Oncology.”
Also, during 2022, the National Comprehensive Cancer Center updated its guidelines and the Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging updated its appropriate use criteria, both noting that PSMA PET imaging agents, including PYLARIFY, can be used for patient selection for PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy.
Throughout 2021 and 2022, we hired additional employees to assist us with the commercialization of PYLARIFY, including in sales, marketing, reimbursement, quality and medical affairs.
In addition to our network of PMFs, we have also been working with academic medical centers in the U.S. that have radioisotope-producing cyclotrons who have expressed an interest in manufacturing PYLARIFY. For this initiative, we enter into a fee-for-service arrangement under which the academic medical center manufactures F 18 on its cyclotron and completes the manufacturing process for PYLARIFY. PYLARIFY can then be used by the academic medical center itself, and in some cases distributed to other customers under separate purchase agreements.
Our commercial launch also required obtaining adequate coding, coverage and payment for PYLARIFY, including not only coverage from Medicare, Medicaid and other government payors, as well as private payors, but also appropriate payment levels, to adequately cover our customers’ costs of using PYLARIFY in PSMA PET/CT imaging procedures. We received notification that our Healthcare Procedure Coding System (“HCPCS”) code, which enables streamlined billing, went into effect as of January 1, 2022. In addition, effective January 1, 2022, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) granted Transitional Pass-Through Payment Status in the hospital outpatient setting (“TPT Status”) for PYLARIFY, enabling traditional Medicare to provide an incremental payment for PET/CT scans performed with PYLARIFY in that setting. TPT Status for PYLARIFY is expected to expire on December 31, 2024. After TPT Status expires, under current Medicare rules, PYLARIFY, similar to other diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals, would not be separately reimbursed in the hospital outpatient setting, but rather would be bundled into the facility payment a hospital receives for a PET/CT imaging procedure, and the facility payment may not always adequately cover the total cost of the procedure.
The successful growth of PYLARIFY is also dependent on our ability to establish PYLARIFY as a leading PSMA PET imaging agent in a competitive environment in which other PSMA PET imaging agents have been approved and additional ones are in development. PYLARIFY’s competition is primarily two commercially available Ga-68-based PSMA imaging agents, as well as other non-PSMA-based imaging agents. We also could face potential competition from an F 18 PSMA PET imaging agent currently under review by the FDA.
In connection with the Progenics Acquisition in June 2020, we issued to the Progenics stockholders at the time the transaction was consummated contingent value rights (“CVRs”) entitling them to receive a pro rata share of aggregate cash payments equal to 40% of U.S. net sales generated by PyLPYLARIFY in 2022 and 2023 in excess of $100$100.0 million and $150$150.0 million, respectively. In no event will our aggregate payments underpayment obligations in respect of the CVRs, together with any other non-stock consideration treated as paid in connection with the Progenics Acquisition, exceed 19.9% of the total consideration we paypaid in the transaction. As a resultProgenics Acquisition. Based on our 2022 PYLARIFY net sales, we determined that the aggregate payment obligation under the CVRs was $99.7 million. We expect to make that payment during the first half of 2023.
PYLARIFY AI Clearance and Use
During 2021, we also announced that our subsidiary, EXINI, was granted 510(k) clearance by the increaseFDA in the exchange ratio, following the completion of the merger, former Progenics stockholders’ aggregate ownership stake will increase to approximately 40% of the combined company from approximately 35%U.S. and received European Conformity Marking (“CE marking”) in Europe for aPROMISE. We commercially launched aPROMISE under the Initial Merger Agreement. Progenics’ stockholders will also now be entitled to appraisal rights as provided under Delaware law. The transaction contemplated byname PYLARIFY AI in the Amended Merger Agreement was unanimously approved by the Boards of Directors of both companies and requires, among other things, the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock of Progenics and a majority of votes cast by the holders of the common stock of the Company.
In addition, pursuant to the Amended Merger Agreement, the holder of each in-the-money Progenics Stock Option will be entitled to receiveU.S. in exchange for each such in-the-money option (i) a Lantheus Stock Option converted based on the 0.31exchange ratio and (ii) a vested or unvested CVR depending on whether the underlying option is vested. Holders of out-of-the-money Progenics Stock Options will receive Lantheus Stock Options converted on an exchange ratio adjusted based on actual trading prices of common stock of Progenics and Lantheus Holdings prior to the effective time of the merger.
The Amended Merger Agreement also provides that on closing our board of directors will appoint Dr. Gerard Ber and Mr. Heinz Mausli, who are currently members of the board of directors of Progenics, to serve on our board of directors. In addition, our board of directors, subject to complying with applicable fiduciary duties, will use commercially reasonable efforts to cause Dr. Ber and Mr. Mausli to be nominated for reelection following the closing through 2023. Our board of directors will be reduced in size from ten to nine members at our annual meeting of stockholders on April 23, 2020 (or sooner if the transaction closes before then) and will be further reduced in size from nine to eight members prior to the date of our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders.
Except as described above, the material terms of the Amended Merger Agreement are substantially the same as the terms of the Initial Merger Agreement.
The transaction is currently expected to close inNovember 2021. During the second quarter of 2020. Upon completion2022, we received a new 510(k) clearance for an updated version of our PYLARIFY AI platform.
PYLARIFY AI is artificial intelligence medical device software that is designed to assist with the acquisition,reading and quantification of PYLARIFY scans. The technology automatically analyzes a PSMA PET/CT image to segment anatomical regions – 51 bones and 12 soft tissue organs. This image segmentation enables automated localization, detection and quantification of potential PSMA-avid lesions in a PSMA PET/CT image, which data is then incorporated into the parties intend to report as tax-deferred to Progenics’ stockholders with respect to the stock component of the merger consideration for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the combined company will continue to be headquartered in North Billerica, Massachusetts and will trade on the NASDAQ under the ticker symbol LNTH.reporting system used by physicians.
See Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for information regarding certain risks associated with our proposed acquisition of Progenics.
Key Factors Affecting Our Results
Our business and financial performance have been, and continue to be, affected by the following:
Anticipated Continued Growth of DEFINITY and Expansion of Our Ultrasound Microbubble Franchise
We believe the market opportunity for our ultrasound microbubble contrast agent, DEFINITY, continues to be significant. DEFINITY is our fastest growing and highest margin commercial product. We anticipate DEFINITY sales will continue to grow and that DEFINITY will constitute a greater share of our overall product mix in 2020 as compared to prior years. As we continue to educate the physician and healthcare provider community about the benefits and risks of DEFINITY, we believe we will be able to continue to grow the appropriate use of DEFINITY in suboptimal echocardiograms. In a U.S. market with three echocardiography contrastultrasound enhancing agents approved by the FDA, we estimate that as of December 31, 2022, DEFINITY hadcontinued to hold over 80% of the market as of December 31, 2019.market.
As we continue to pursue expanding our microbubble franchise, our activities include:
•Patents - We continue to actively pursue additional patents in connection with DEFINITY and DEFINITY RT, both in the U.S. and internationally. In the U.S.,
•DEFINITY RT - The formulation of DEFINITY that we have an Orange Book-listed method of use patent expiring in March 2037 and additional manufacturing patents that are not Orange Book-listed expiring in 2021, 2023 and 2037. Outside of the U.S., while our
branded as DEFINITY patent protection and regulatory exclusivity have generally expired, we are currently prosecuting additional patents to try to obtain similar method of use and manufacturing patent protection as grantedRT became commercially available in the U.S.
Hatch-Waxman Act - Even though our longest duration Orange Book-listedfourth quarter of 2021. DEFINITY patent extends until March 2037, because our Orange Book-listed composition of matter patent expired in June 2019, we may face generic DEFINITY challengers in the near to intermediate term. Under the Hatch-Waxman Act, the FDA can approve ANDAs for generic versions of drugs if the ANDA applicant demonstrates, among other things, that (i) its generic candidate is the same as the innovator product by establishing bioequivalenceRT allows both storage and providing relevant chemistry, manufacturing and product data, and (ii) the marketing of that generic candidate does not infringe an Orange Book-listed patent. With respect to any Orange Book-listed patent covering the innovator product, the ANDA applicant must give Notice to the innovator that the ANDA applicant certifies that its generic candidate will not infringe the innovator’s Orange Book-listed patent or that the Orange Book-listed patent is invalid. The innovator can then challenge the ANDA applicant in court within 45 days of receiving that Notice, and FDA approval to commercialize the generic candidate will be stayed (that is, delayed) for up to 30 months (measured from the date on which a Notice is received) while the patent dispute between the innovator and the ANDA applicant is resolved in court. The 30 month stay could potentially expire sooner if the courts determine that no infringement had occurred or that the challenged Orange Book-listed patent is invalid or if the parties otherwise settle their dispute.
As of the date of filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have not received any Notice from an ANDA applicant. If we were to (i) receive any such Notice in the future, (ii) bring a patent infringement suit against the ANDA applicant within 45 days of receiving that Notice, and (iii) successfully obtain the full 30 month stay, then the ANDA applicant would be precluded from commercializing a generic version of DEFINITY prior to the expiration of that 30 month stay period and, potentially, thereafter, depending on how the patent dispute is resolved. Solely by way of example and not based on any knowledge we currently have, if we received a Notice from an ANDA applicant in March 2020 and the full 30 month stay was obtained, then the ANDA applicant would be precluded from commercialization until at least September 2022. If we received a Notice some number of months in the future and the full 30 month stay was obtained, the commercialization date would roll forward in the future by the same calculation.
Modified Formulation - We are developing at SBL a modified formulation of DEFINITY. We believe this modified formulation will provide an enhanced product profile enabling storage as well as shipment at room temperature (DEFINITY’s current formulation requires refrigerated storage), will giveand provides clinicians an additional choice and will allowallows for greater utility of this formulation in broader clinical settings. We were recently granted a composition of matter patent on the modified formulation which runs through December 2035. If the modified formulation is approved by the FDA, then this patent would be eligible to be listed in the Orange Book. We currently believe that, if approved by the FDA, the modified formulation could become commercially available in early 2021, although that timing cannot be assured. Given its physical characteristics, the modified formulation maywe believe DEFINITY RT is also be better suitedwell-suited for inclusion in kits requiring microbubbles for other indications and applications (including in kits developed by third parties of the type described in the next paragraph)paragraph entitled MicrobubbleFranchise below).
New Clinical Applications - As we continue to look for other opportunities to expand our microbubble franchise, we are evaluating new indications and clinical applications beyond echocardiography and contrast imaging generally. For example, we recently announced a strategic development and commercial collaboration with Cerevast in which our microbubble will be used in connection with Cerevast’s ocular ultrasound device to target improving blood flow in occluded retinal veins in the eye. Retinal vein occlusion•VIALMIX RFID – DEFINITY is one of the most common causes of vision loss worldwide. We also recently announced a strategic commercial supply agreement with CarThera foractivated through the use of our microbubbles in combination with SonoCloud, a proprietary implantable device in development formedical devices branded as VIALMIX and VIALMIX RFID. The activation rate and time are controlled by VIALMIX RFID through the treatmentuse of recurrent glioblastoma. GlioblastomaRFID to ensure reproducible activation of DEFINITY. The RFID tag, which is a lethal and devastating form of brain cancer with median survival of 15 months after diagnosis.
In-House Manufacturing - We are currently building specialized in-house manufacturing capabilities at our North Billerica, Massachusetts facility foraffixed to the vial label, enables the DEFINITY and, potentially, other sterile vial products. We believe the investment in these efforts will allow us to better control DEFINITY manufacturing and inventory, reduce our costs in a potentially more price competitive environment, and provide us with supply chain redundancy. We currently expect to be in a position to use this in-house manufacturing capability by early 2021, although that timing cannot be assured.
appropriately activated with the VIALMIX RFID activation device.Global Mo-99 Supply
We currently have Mo-99 supply agreements with IRE,Institute for Radioelements (“IRE”), running through December 31, 2022, and renewable by us on a year-to-year basis thereafter,2023, with auto-renewal provisions that are terminable upon notice of non-renewal, and with NTP Radioisotopes (“NTP”), acting for itself and ANSTO,on behalf of its subcontractor, the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (“ANSTO”), running through December 31, 2021. We also have a Xenon supply agreement with IRE which runs through June 30, 2022, and which is subject to further extension.2024.
Although we have a globally diverse Mo-99 supply with IRE in Belgium, NTP in South Africa, and ANSTO in Australia, we still face supplier and logistical challenges in our Mo-99 supply chain. The NTP processing facility has had periodicWhen one supplier experiences outages, in 2017, 2018 and 2019. When NTP was not producing, we reliedgenerally rely on Mo-99 supply from both IRE and ANSTOthe other suppliers to limit the impact of the NTP outages. In the second quarter of 2019, ANSTO experienced facility issues in its existing Mo-99 processing facility which resulted in a decrease in Mo-99 available to us. In addition, as ANSTO transitioned from its existing Mo-99 processing facility to its new Mo-99 processing facility in
the second quarter of 2019, ANSTO experienced start-up and transition challenges, which also resulted in a decrease in Mo-99 available to us. Further, starting in late June 2019 and through the date of this filing, ANSTO’s new Mo-99 processing facility has experienced unscheduled production outages, andWe believe we are now relying on IRE and NTP to limit the impact of those ANSTO outages. Because ofeffectively manage these various supply chain constraints,challenges, but depending on reactor and processor schedules and operations, at times we have not been able to fill some or all of the demand for our TechneLite generators on certain manufacturing days.
ANSTO’s new A prolonged disruption of service from one of our three Mo-99 processing facility,sites or one of their main Mo-99-producing reactors could eventually increase ANSTO’shave a substantial negative effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
To augment our current supply of Mo-99, production capacity from approximately 2,000 curies per week to 3,500 curies per week with additional committed financial and operational resources. At full ramp-up capacity, ANSTO’s new facility could provide incremental supply to our globally diversified Mo-99 supply chain and therefore mitigate some risk among our Mo-99 suppliers, although we can give no assurances to that effect. In addition, we also have a strategic arrangement with SHINE a Wisconsin-based company,Technologies LLC (“SHINE”) for the future supply of Mo-99. Under the terms of thatthe supply agreement, entered into in November 2014, SHINE will provide us Mo-99 produced using its proprietary LEU-solution technology for use in our TechneLite generators once SHINE’s facility becomes operational and receives all necessary regulatory approvals, which SHINE now estimates will occur in 2022.2024. The term of this arrangement provides for three years of supply of Mo-99. However, we cannot assure you that SHINE will be able to produce commercial quantities of Mo-99 for our business, or that SHINE, together with our current suppliers, will be able to deliver a sufficient quantity of Mo-99 to meet our needs.
Inventory Supply
We obtain a substantial portion of our imaging agents from third-party suppliers, JHSa third party supplier. Jubilant HollisterStier (“JHS”) is currently a significant supplier of DEFINITY and our sole source manufacturer of DEFINITY, Neurolite, CardioliteNEUROLITE, CARDIOLITE and evacuation vials, the latter being an ancillary component for our TechneLite generators. We are currently seeking approval from certain foreign regulatory authorities forOn February 23, 2022, our wholly-owned subsidiary, LMI, entered into a Manufacturing and Supply Agreement (the “MSA”) with JHS, effective as of February 23, 2022, pursuant to which JHS will manufacture, certain of ourand LMI will purchase, DEFINITY, NEUROLITE, CARDIOLITE and evacuation vial products. Until we receive these approvals, we will face continued limitations on where we can sell those products outsideThe new MSA supersedes all of the U.S.
prior agreements of the parties. The initial term of the MSA runs through December 31, 2027 and can be further extended by mutual agreement of the parties. The MSA requires LMI to purchase from JHS specified percentages of its total requirements for DEFINITY, as well as specified quantities of NEUROLITE, CARDIOLITE and evacuation vial products, each year during the contract term. Either party can terminate the MSA upon the occurrence of certain events, including the material breach or bankruptcy of the other party. In addition to JHS, we are also currently working to secure additional alternative suppliers forrely on Samsung BioLogics as our key products as part of our ongoing supply chain diversification strategy. We have ongoing development and technology transfer activities for a modified formulationsole source manufacturer of DEFINITY with SBL, which is located in South Korea. We currently believe that if approved byRT.
In 2021, we completed the FDA, the modified formulation could be commercially available in early 2021, although that timing cannot be assured. We are also buildingconstruction of a specialized in-house specialized manufacturing capabilitiesfacility at our North Billerica Massachusettscampus to produce DEFINITY and, potentially, other sterile vial products. On February 22, 2022, we received FDA approval of our supplemental new drug application authorizing commercial manufacturing of DEFINITY at our new facility, as part of a larger strategy to create a competitive advantage in specialized manufacturing, whichand inventory that we had previously manufactured at this facility became commercially saleable. We believe this facility will also allow us to optimizebetter manage DEFINITY manufacturing and inventory, reduce our costs in a potentially more price competitive environment, and reduce ourprovide us with supply chain risk. We can give no assurance as to when or if we will be successful in these efforts or that we will be able to successfully manufacture any additional commercial products at our North Billerica, Massachusetts facility.redundancy.
Radiopharmaceuticals are decaying radioisotopes with half-lives ranging from a few hours to several days. These productsRadiopharmaceutical finished goods cannot be kept in inventory because of their limited shelf lives and are subject to just-in-time manufacturing, processing and distribution, which takes place at our facilities in North Billerica, Massachusetts facility.and Somerset, New Jersey, as well as at our PMF partner manufacturing facilities across the U.S.
COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Challenges
The global COVID-19 pandemic has had, and could still have, a future negative impact on our business, particularly if there are additional resurgences as a result of new variants of the virus that further increase its communicability or its impact on certain populations, geographic regions and the healthcare system, including elective procedures and hospital access. In addition, our business has been impacted by hospital staffing challenges and a decline in the volume of certain procedures and treatments using our products.
Research and Development Expenses
To remain a leader in the marketplace, we have historically made and will continue to make substantial investments in new product development. As a result, the positive contributions of those internally funded research and development programs have been a key factor in our historical results and success. On April 25, 2017, we announced entering into a definitive, exclusive Collaboration and License Agreement with GE Healthcare for the continued Phase 3 development and worldwide commercializationlifecycle management for existing products, including:
•For PYLARIFY, our development of flurpiridaz F 18. For LMI 1195, our PET-based molecular imaging agent for the norepinephrine pathway, we are currently designing two Phase 3 clinical trials for the use of LMI 1195 for the diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumorsPYLARIFY resulted in pediatric and adult populations, respectively. The FDA has granted an Orphan Drug designation for the use of LMI 1195 in the management indication. We have also received notice of eligibility for a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher for a subsequent human drug application so long as LMI 1195 is approvedapproval by the FDA in May 2021.
•For PYLARIFY AI, our development of PYLARIFY AI resulted in a 510(k) clearance granted by the FDA in the third quarter of 2021 and an additional 510(k) clearance granted during the second quarter of 2022.
•For PNT2002 and PNT2003, we were granted a license to exclusive worldwide rights (excluding certain countries) for its rare pediatric disease indication prior$260.0 million in upfront payments during the fourth quarter of 2022 and will potentially make additional payments as described below.
•For 1095, we enrolled the last patient in our ARROW Phase 2 study during the second quarter of 2022. Patients in this study will be followed for one year after their first treatment for all efficacy endpoints and survival and safety data will be collected for an additional year.
•We are also exploring additional lifecycle management opportunities for some of our current products.
PNT2002
Under the terms of the PNT2002 License Agreement, Lantheus Two, LLC (“Lantheus Two”) paid POINT an upfront cash payment of $250.0 million, and could pay up to September 30, 2022. an additional $281.0 million in milestone payments upon the achievement of specified U.S. and ex-U.S. regulatory milestones related to PNT2002. POINT is also eligible to receive up to $1.3 billion in sales milestone payments upon the achievement of specified annual sales thresholds of PNT2002. In addition, after Lantheus Two achieves $500.0 million in cumulative gross profit, POINT is eligible to receive royalty payments of twenty percent of net sales of PNT2002. Prior to achieving that financial recoupment threshold, POINT is eligible to receive royalty payments of twenty percent on that portion of annual net sales of PNT2002 that generate annual gross profit in excess of specified levels.
PNT2003
Under the terms of the PNT2003 License Agreement, Lantheus Three, LLC paid POINT an upfront cash payment of $10.0 million, and could pay up to an additional $34.5 million in milestone payments upon the achievement of specified U.S. and ex-U.S. regulatory milestones related to PNT2003. POINT is also eligible to receive up to $275.0 million in sales milestone payments upon the achievement of specified annual sales thresholds of PNT2003. In addition, POINT is eligible to receive royalty payments of fifteen percent of net sales of PNT2003.
Our investments in these additional clinical activities and lifecycle management opportunities will increase our operating expenses and impact our results of operations and cash flow, and we can give no assurances as to whether any of these clinical development candidates or when LMI 1195 wouldlifecycle management opportunities will be approved.successful.
As part of our microbubble franchise strategy, we also conducted two Phase 3, open-label, multicenter studies to evaluate LVEF measurement accuracyStrategic Partnerships and reproducibility of DEFINITY contrast-enhanced and unenhanced echocardiography as compared to non-contrast CMRI used as the truth standard. The first of the two trials, BENEFIT 1, enrolled 145 subjects. After reviewing the study results from BENEFIT 1, we concluded there was no statistically significant improvement in the accuracy of LVEF values for contrast-enhanced echocardiography versus unenhanced echocardiography as compared to CMRI. In addition, analyses of the secondary endpoints revealed no improvement in inter-reader variability between the contrast-enhanced and unenhanced echocardiograms for LVEF assessments. A post-hoc analysis, however, did show statistically significant improvements in left ventricular diastolic, systolic and stroke volume measurements with contrast-enhanced versus unenhanced echocardiography when compared to CMRI. We will continue to analyze the BENEFIT 1 data, and when the data from BENEFIT 2 are available, we will compile the data sets to analyze the full results of the trials.
New Initiatives
Other Revenue
We continue to evaluateseek ways to further increase the overall value of our portfolio of products and product candidates. We are evaluating a number of different opportunities to acquirecollaborate, in-license or in-licenseacquire additional products, product candidates, businesses and technologies to drive our future growth. WeIn particular, we are particularly interestedfocused on late-stage diagnostic and therapeutic product opportunities in oncology and other strategic areas that will complement our existing portfolio.
Oncology
As we continue to pursue expanding our presencestrategic partnerships, our Pharma Services activities in oncology are designed to enable precision medicine using biomarkers and digital solutions that augment diagnostic productivity. For example, with respect to prostate cancer, we collaborate with pharmaceutical companies by supplying them with piflufolastat F 18 for use in radiotherapeuticstheir therapeutic drug development programs. For immuno-oncology, we intend to offer NM-01, a novel technetium-99m SPECT imaging agent that we are developing to assess PD-L1 expression in cancer cells, for potential use as wellan efficacy and safety biomarker in immuno-oncology therapies. With respect to pan-oncology, we are further exploring the use of NTI-1309 as diagnostics. In addition to the Progenics Transaction described above, we recently entered into a strategic collaboration and license agreement with NanoMab Technology Limited, a privately-held biopharmaceutical company focusing on the development of next generation radiopharmaceuticals for cancer precision medicine. We believe this collaboration will provide the first broadly-availablean innovative imaging biomarker research tool to pharmaceutical companies and academic centers conducting research and development on PD-L1 immuno-oncology treatments, including combination therapies. We can give no assurance as to when or if this collaboration will be successful or accretive to earnings.that targets fibroblast activation protein.
Microbubble Franchise
In addition, as described above, we continue to expand our microbubble franchise. We recentlyIn December 2022, we announced a strategic development and commercial collaboration with SonoThera, Inc. (“SonoThera”), which will use our microbubbles in combination with SonoThera’s ultrasound-guided, non-viral, gene therapy platform and treatments. Prior to 2022, we entered into microbubble collaborations with the following parties: (i) Cerevast Medical, Inc. (“Cerevast”), in which our microbubblemicrobubbles will be used in connection with Cerevast’s ocular ultrasound device to target improvingimprove blood flow in occluded retinal veins in the eye. We also recently announced a strategic commercial supply agreement witheye; (ii) CarThera SAS, for the use of our microbubbles in combination with SonoCloud, a proprietary implantable device in development for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma.glioblastoma; (iii) Insightec Ltd. (“Insightec”), which will
use our microbubbles in connection with the development of Insightec’s transcranial guided focused ultrasound device for the treatment of glioblastoma as well as other neurodegenerative conditions; and (iv) Allegheny Health Network (“AHN”), which will use our microbubbles in combination with AHN’s ultrasound-assisted non-viral gene transfer technology for the development of a proposed treatment of xerostomia.
flurpiridaz
In September 2022, we announced with our strategic partner GE Healthcare Limited (“GE Healthcare”) that the recent Phase III clinical trial of our investigational radiotracer, flurpiridaz, had met its co-primary endpoints of exceeding a 60% threshold for both sensitivity and specificity for detecting coronary artery disease (“CAD”). The findings, shared at an American Society of Nuclear Cardiology conference, also demonstrated that cardiac PET imaging with flurpiridaz has higher diagnostic efficacy and image quality in patients with suspected CAD, compared with single photon emission computed tomography (“SPECT”) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (“MPI”), the predominant procedure currently used in nuclear cardiology. We believe SPECT MPI represents approximately 6 million procedures per year in the U.S.
Under a Collaboration and License Agreement we entered into with GE Healthcare in 2017, GE Healthcare has led the funding and development of flurpiridaz, and, if the imaging agent is approved, will have the global commercialization rights for it. We have collaborated on the development and will also collaborate on potential commercialization through a joint steering committee. If flurpiridaz receives regulatory approval and is commercially successful, we will receive:
• up to $60 million in regulatory and sales milestone payments,
• tiered double-digit royalties on U.S. sales., and
• mid-single digit royalties on sales outside of the U.S.
Generally, our costs in connection with the strategic partnerships relate to the supply of drug and other ancillary expenses and the benefits can include possible supply, milestone and royalty payments, additional intellectual property rights and strategic relationships. For flurpiridaz, under the Collaboration and License Agreement, we retained ownership of all of the licensed intellectual property and bear the cost of patent prosecution and maintenance. We can give no assurance as to if or when or if any of these collaborations and other new initiatives, including our collaboration for flurpiridaz, will be successful or accretive to earnings.
Results of Operations
The following is a summary of our consolidated results of operations:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, | | 2022 vs. 2021 | | 2021 vs. 2020 |
| (in thousands) | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | Change
$ | | Change
% | | Change
$ | | Change
% |
| Revenues | $ | 935,061 | | | $ | 425,208 | | | $ | 339,410 | | | $ | 509,853 | | | 119.9 | % | | $ | 85,798 | | | 25.3 | % |
| Cost of goods sold | 353,358 | | | 237,513 | | | 200,649 | | | 115,845 | | | 48.8 | % | | 36,864 | | | 18.4 | % |
| Gross profit | 581,703 | | | 187,695 | | | 138,761 | | | 394,008 | | | 209.9 | % | | 48,934 | | | 35.3 | % |
| Operating expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Sales and marketing | 100,243 | | | 68,422 | | | 40,901 | | | 31,821 | | | 46.5 | % | | 27,521 | | | 67.3 | % |
| General and administrative | 133,584 | | | 150,395 | | | 69,270 | | | (16,811) | | | (11.2) | % | | 81,125 | | | 117.1 | % |
| Research and development | 311,681 | | | 44,966 | | | 32,788 | | | 266,715 | | | 593.1 | % | | 12,178 | | | 37.1 | % |
| Total operating expenses | 545,508 | | | 263,783 | | | 142,959 | | | 281,725 | | | 106.8 | % | | 120,824 | | | 84.5 | % |
| Gain on sales of assets | — | | | 15,263 | | | — | | | (15,263) | | | N/A | | 15,263 | | | N/A |
| Operating income (loss) | 36,195 | | | (60,825) | | | (4,198) | | | 97,020 | | | (159.5) | % | | (56,627) | | | 1,348.9 | % |
| Interest expense | 7,185 | | | 7,752 | | | 9,479 | | | (567) | | | (7.3) | % | | (1,727) | | | (18.2) | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt | 588 | | | (889) | | | — | | | 1,477 | | | (166.1) | % | | (889) | | | N/A |
| Other loss (income) | 1,703 | | | 7,350 | | | (2,198) | | | (5,647) | | | (76.8) | % | | 9,548 | | | (434.4) | % |
| Income (loss) before income taxes | 26,719 | | | (75,038) | | | (11,479) | | | 101,757 | | | (135.6) | % | | (63,559) | | | 553.7 | % |
| Income tax (benefit) expense | (1,348) | | | (3,759) | | | 1,994 | | | 2,411 | | | (64.1) | % | | (5,753) | | | (288.5) | % |
| Net income (loss) | $ | 28,067 | | | $ | (71,279) | | | $ | (13,473) | | | $ | 99,346 | | | (139.4) | % | | $ | (57,806) | | | 429.1 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Revenues | $ | 347,337 |
| | $ | 343,374 |
| | $ | 331,378 |
|
| Cost of goods sold | 172,526 |
| | 168,489 |
| | 169,243 |
|
| Gross profit | 174,811 |
| | 174,885 |
| | 162,135 |
|
| Operating expenses | | |
| |
|
| Sales and marketing | 41,888 |
| | 43,159 |
| | 42,315 |
|
| General and administrative | 61,244 |
| | 50,167 |
| | 49,842 |
|
| Research and development | 20,018 |
| | 17,071 |
| | 18,125 |
|
| Total operating expenses | 123,150 |
| | 110,397 |
| | 110,282 |
|
| Operating income | 51,661 |
| | 64,488 |
| | 51,853 |
|
| Interest expense | 13,617 |
| | 17,405 |
| | 18,410 |
|
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | 3,196 |
| | — |
| | 2,442 |
|
| Other expense (income) | 6,221 |
| | (2,465 | ) | | (8,638 | ) |
| Income before income taxes | 28,627 |
| | 49,548 |
| | 39,639 |
|
| Income tax (benefit) expense | (3,040 | ) | | 9,030 |
| | (83,746 | ) |
| Net income | $ | 31,667 |
| | $ | 40,518 |
| | $ | 123,385 |
|
Comparison of the Periods Ended December 31, 20192022 and 20182021
Revenues
SegmentWe classify our revenues into three product categories: Precision Diagnostics, Radiopharmaceutical Oncology, and Strategic Partnerships and Other Revenue. Precision Diagnostics includes DEFINITY, TechneLite and other diagnostic imaging products. Radiopharmaceutical Oncology consists primarily of PYLARIFY and AZEDRA. Strategic Partnerships and Other Revenue includes out-licensing arrangements, which includes $24.0 million of revenue recognized pursuant to the Novartis Agreement, partnerships that focus on facilitating precision medicine through the use of biomarkers, digital solutions and radiotherapeutic platforms, and on our other products, such as RELISTOR.
Revenues are summarized by product category on a net basis as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
December 31, | | 2019 vs. 2018 | | 2018 vs. 2017 |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | Change
$ | | Change
% | | Change
$ | | Change
% |
| U.S. | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| DEFINITY | $ | 211,777 |
| | $ | 178,440 |
| | $ | 153,581 |
| | $ | 33,337 |
| | 18.7 | % | | $ | 24,859 |
| | 16.2 | % |
| TechneLite | 72,534 |
| | 74,042 |
| | 90,489 |
| | (1,508 | ) | | (2.0 | )% | | (16,447 | ) | | (18.2 | )% |
| Other nuclear | 36,231 |
| | 48,935 |
| | 54,822 |
| | (12,704 | ) | | (26.0 | )% | | (5,887 | ) | | (10.7 | )% |
| Rebates and allowances | (16,553 | ) | | (12,837 | ) | | (8,890 | ) | | (3,716 | ) | | 28.9 | % | | (3,947 | ) | | 44.4 | % |
| Total U.S. Revenues | 303,989 |
| | 288,580 |
| | 290,002 |
| | 15,409 |
| | 5.3 | % | | (1,422 | ) | | (0.5 | )% |
| International | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| DEFINITY | 5,731 |
| | 4,633 |
| | 3,687 |
| | 1,098 |
| | 23.7 | % | | 946 |
| | 25.7 | % |
| TechneLite | 14,058 |
| | 24,816 |
| | 14,155 |
| | (10,758 | ) | | (43.4 | )% | | 10,661 |
| | 75.3 | % |
| Other nuclear | 23,574 |
| | 25,349 |
| | 23,558 |
| | (1,775 | ) | | (7.0 | )% | | 1,791 |
| | 7.6 | % |
| Rebates and allowances | (15 | ) | | (4 | ) | | (24 | ) | | (11 | ) | | 275.0 | % | | 20 |
| | (83.3 | )% |
| Total International Revenues | 43,348 |
| | 54,794 |
| | 41,376 |
| | (11,446 | ) | | (20.9 | )% | | 13,418 |
| | 32.4 | % |
| Worldwide | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| DEFINITY | 217,508 |
| | 183,073 |
| | 157,268 |
| | 34,435 |
| | 18.8 | % | | 25,805 |
| | 16.4 | % |
| TechneLite | 86,592 |
| | 98,858 |
| | 104,644 |
| | (12,266 | ) | | (12.4 | )% | | (5,786 | ) | | (5.5 | )% |
| Other nuclear | 59,805 |
| | 74,284 |
| | 78,380 |
| | (14,479 | ) | | (19.5 | )% | | (4,096 | ) | | (5.2 | )% |
| Rebates and allowances | (16,568 | ) | | (12,841 | ) | | (8,914 | ) | | (3,727 | ) | | 29.0 | % | | (3,927 | ) | | 44.1 | % |
| Total Revenues | $ | 347,337 |
| | $ | 343,374 |
| | $ | 331,378 |
| | $ | 3,963 |
| | 1.2 | % | | $ | 11,996 |
| | 3.6 | % |
2019 vs. 2018 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | 2022 vs. 2021 | | |
| (in thousands) | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | Change $ | | Change % | | | | |
| DEFINITY | | $ | 244,993 | | | $ | 232,759 | | | $ | 195,865 | | | $ | 12,234 | | | 5.3 | % | | | | |
| TechneLite | | 88,864 | | | 91,293 | | | 84,945 | | | (2,429) | | | (2.7) | % | | | | |
| Other precision diagnostics | | 22,825 | | | 26,973 | | | 36,824 | | | (4,148) | | | (15.4) | % | | | | |
| Total precision diagnostics | | 356,682 | | | 351,025 | | | 317,634 | | | 5,657 | | | 1.6 | % | | | | |
| PYLARIFY | | 527,405 | | | 43,414 | | | — | | | 483,991 | | | 1,114.8 | % | | | | |
| Other radiopharmaceutical oncology | | 4,102 | | | 5,473 | | | 10,022 | | | (1,371) | | | (25.1) | % | | | | |
| Total radiopharmaceutical oncology | | 531,507 | | | 48,887 | | | 10,022 | | | 482,620 | | | 987.2 | % | | | | |
| Strategic Partnerships and other revenue | | 46,872 | | | 25,296 | | | 11,754 | | | 21,576 | | | 85.3 | % | | | | |
| Total revenues | | $ | 935,061 | | | $ | 425,208 | | | $ | 339,410 | | | $ | 509,853 | | | 119.9 | % | | | | |
The increase in U.S. segment revenues duringfor the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, as compared to the prior year period, is primarily duedriven by the commercial launch of PYLARIFY and $24.0 million of revenue recognized pursuant to a $33.3 millionthe Novartis Agreement, and an increase in DEFINITY revenue as a result of higher unitsales volume. ThisThe increase wasis offset, in part, by decreases primarily associated with lower Xenon and other nuclear product volume, an increase in rebate and allowance provisions and lowersales volumes from TechneLite revenue driven by temporary supplier disruptions.
The decrease in International segment revenues during the year ended December 31, 2019, as comparedstrategic decision to the prior year is primarily due toexit a decrease of $10.8 million in TechneLite revenue primarily driven bycustomer contract and opportunistic incremental demandsales in the prior year, period and temporary supplier disruptions in the current period, lower volumes of other nuclearprecision diagnostics driven by cease of vial line production, lower volume of other radiopharmaceutical oncology products and lower strategic partnerships and other revenue due primarily to a negative exchange rate impactsale of approximately $0.4 million, offsetthe heart myocardial perfusion analysis software, cREPO, in part, by higher DEFINITY revenue driven by increased volume.the prior year period.
Rebates and Allowances
Estimates for rebates and allowances represent our estimated obligations under contractual arrangements with third parties. Rebate accruals and allowances are recorded in the same period the related revenue is recognized, resulting in a reduction to revenue and the establishment of a liability which is included in accrued expenses. These rebates and allowances result from performance-based offers that are primarily based on attaining contractually specified sales volumes and growth, Medicaid rebate programs for our products, administrative fees of group purchasing organizations and certain distributor related commissions. The calculation of the accrual for these rebates and allowances is based on an estimate of the third-party’s buying patternsexpected purchases and the resulting applicable contractual rebate to be earned over a contractual period.
An analysis of the amount of, and change in, reserves is summarized as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | | Rebates and
Allowances |
| Balance, January 1, 2022 | | $ | 10,977 | |
| Provision related to current period revenues | | 26,683 | |
| Adjustments relating to prior period revenues | | 70 | |
| Payments or credits made during the period | | (24,331) | |
| Balance, December 31, 2022 | | $ | 13,399 | |
|
| | | |
| (in thousands) | Rebates and
Allowances |
| Balance, January 1, 2019 | $ | 4,654 |
|
Provision related to current period revenues
| 16,729 |
|
Adjustments relating to prior period revenues
| (161 | ) |
Payments or credits made during the period
| (14,237 | ) |
| Balance, December 31, 2019 | $ | 6,985 |
|
Gross Profit
Gross profit is summarized by segment as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
December 31, | | 2019 vs. 2018 | | 2018 vs. 2017 |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | Change
$ | | Change
% | | Change
$ | | Change
% |
| U.S. | $ | 164,051 |
| | $ | 161,760 |
| | $ | 154,671 |
| | $ | 2,291 |
| | 1.4 | % | | $ | 7,089 |
| | 4.6 | % |
| International | 10,760 |
| | 13,125 |
| | 7,464 |
| | (2,365 | ) | | (18.0 | )% | | 5,661 |
| | 75.8 | % |
| Total Gross profit | $ | 174,811 |
| | $ | 174,885 |
| | $ | 162,135 |
| | $ | (74 | ) | | — | % | | $ | 12,750 |
| | 7.9 | % |
2019 vs. 2018
The increase in U.S. segment gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, as compared to the prior year period, is primarily attributabledue to higher DEFINITY unit volume. This wasPYLARIFY sales volume and the $24.0 million pursuant to the Novartis Agreement, which is partially offset by lower TechneLite, Xenon and other nuclear product unit volume, as well as an increaseamortization expense of acquired intangible assets in rebate and allowance provisions.the Progenics Acquisition.
The decrease in International segment gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to the prior year is primarily attributable to lower volume
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and other related costs for personnel in field sales, marketing and customer service functions. Other costs in sales and marketing expenses include the development and printing of advertising and promotional material, professional services, market research and sales meetings.
Sales and marketing expense is summarized by segment as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
December 31, | | 2019 vs. 2018 | | 2018 vs. 2017 |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | Change
$ | | Change
% | | Change
$ | | Change
% |
| U.S. | $ | 39,672 |
| | $ | 40,579 |
| | $ | 39,471 |
| | $ | (907 | ) | | (2.2 | )% | | $ | 1,108 |
| | 2.8 | % |
| International | 2,216 |
| | 2,580 |
| | 2,844 |
| | (364 | ) | | (14.1 | )% | | (264 | ) | | (9.3 | )% |
| Total Sales and marketing | $ | 41,888 |
| | $ | 43,159 |
| | $ | 42,315 |
| | $ | (1,271 | ) | | (2.9 | )% | | $ | 844 |
| | 2.0 | % |
2019 vs. 2018
The decrease in the U.S. segment sales and marketing expenses increased $31.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, as compared to the prior year period isperiod. This was primarily due to lower market researchdriven by the continued commercialization activities following the launch of PYLARIFY and increased employee-related costs.
The decreasecosts (including the hiring of new employees throughout 2021 and 2022 in connection with the commercialization activities for PYLARIFY), as well as an increase in the International segment saleslevel of marketing promotional programs and marketing expenses for the for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared totravel during this period which was reduced during the prior year period is primarily due to lower employee-related costs.the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses consist of salaries and other related costs for personnel in executive, finance, legal, information technology and human resource functions. Other costs included in general and administrative expenses are professional fees for information technology services, external legal fees, consulting and accounting services as well as bad debt expense, certain facility and insurance costs, including director and officer liability insurance.
General and administrative expense is summarized by segment as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
December 31, | | 2019 vs. 2018 | | 2018 vs. 2017 |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | Change
$ | | Change
% | | Change
$ | | Change
% |
| U.S. | $ | 60,752 |
| | $ | 49,149 |
| | $ | 49,269 |
| | $ | 11,603 |
| | 23.6 | % | | $ | (120 | ) | | (0.2 | )% |
| International | 492 |
| | 1,018 |
| | 573 |
| | (526 | ) | | (51.7 | )% | | 445 |
| | 77.7 | % |
| Total General and administrative | $ | 61,244 |
| | $ | 50,167 |
| | $ | 49,842 |
| | $ | 11,077 |
| | 22.1 | % | | $ | 325 |
| | 0.7 | % |
2019 vs. 2018
The increase in U.S. segment general and administrative expenses decreased $16.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, as2022 compared to the prior year isperiod. This was primarily driven primarily by an increase in acquisition-related costs associated with the pending acquisition of Progenics and higher employee-related costs. This increase was offset, in part, by lower campus consolidation and information technology costs as a result of prior year efficiency projects.
The International segment general and administrative expenses decreased$37.7 million net reduction for the year ended December 31, 2019, as comparedfair value adjustments to the contingent asset and liabilities. (refer to Note 4, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments”, for further details on contingent consideration liabilities, including CVRs) and a $9.5 million sublease impairment charge in the prior year driven primarilyperiod. These reductions were offset by an insurance benefit received in the current period.increased employee-related costs and professional fees.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses relate primarily to the development of new products to add to our portfolio and costs related to our medical affairs, medical information and regulatory functions. We do not allocate research and development expenses incurred in the U.S. to our International segment.
Research and development expense is summarized by segment as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
December 31, | | 2019 vs. 2018 | | 2018 vs. 2017 |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | Change
$ | | Change
% | | Change
$ | | Change
% |
| U.S. | $ | 19,352 |
| | $ | 15,705 |
| | $ | 16,692 |
| | $ | 3,647 |
| | 23.2 | % | | $ | (987 | ) | | (5.9 | )% |
| International | 666 |
| | 1,366 |
| | 1,433 |
| | (700 | ) | | (51.2 | )% | | (67 | ) | | (4.7 | )% |
| Total Research and development | $ | 20,018 |
| | $ | 17,071 |
| | $ | 18,125 |
| | $ | 2,947 |
| | 17.3 | % | | $ | (1,054 | ) | | (5.8 | )% |
2019 vs. 2018
The increase in U.S. segment research and development expenses increased $266.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019,2022 as compared to the prior year isperiod. This was primarily attributabledriven by the $260.0 million upfront payment between the two agreements with POINT, the phasing of activity of the ARROW Phase 2 study of 1095, investment in medical affairs related to clinical researchPYLARIFY and higher overall headcount related costs. These increases were partially offset by the expenses related to DEFINITY studies, a one-time payment relating to a collaboration and license agreement entered into in Q2 2019, and higher employee-related costs.
The decrease in the International segment research and development expensesfiling fees for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared toPYLARIFY New Drug Application and preparation activities for the launch of PYLARIFY during the prior year period is driven by a European Phase 4 study for one of our products in the prior year.period.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 20192022 decreased $3.8$0.6 million as compared to the prior year period due tobecause in 2021, we repaid the refinancing ofoutstanding principal on our existing indebtedness.$50.0 million loan agreement (the “Royalty-Backed Loan”) between Progenics, through a wholly-owned subsidiary MNTX Royalties Sub LLC, and a fund managed by HealthCare Royalty Partners III, L.P.
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt
During the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, we incurredrealized a $3.2$0.6 million loss on extinguishment of debt in connection withrelated to the refinancing of our existingexisted indebtedness.
Other ExpenseLoss (Income)
Other expenseloss (income) changeddecreased by $8.7$5.6 million for the year ended December 31, 20192022 as compared to the prior year period, due to the termination of the interest rate swaps on December 2, 2022 and an increase in interest income offset by the reduction of indemnified receivables related to the release of our uncertain tax positions. The offset was recorded in income tax (benefit) expense. Refer to Note 5, Income Taxes. This expense, in part, was offset by the impact of proceeds received related to an arbitration award and an increase in interest income.
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense
IncomeOur effective tax (benefit) expenserate for each reporting period is summarizedpresented as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
December 31, | | 2019 vs. 2018 | | 2018 vs. 2017 |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | Change
$ | | Change
% | | Change
$ | | Change
% |
| Income tax (benefit) expense | $ | (3,040 | ) | | $ | 9,030 |
| | $ | (83,746 | ) | | $ | (12,070 | ) | | (133.7 | )% | | $ | 92,776 |
| | (110.8 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended
December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | |
| Effective tax rate | (5.0)% | | 5.0% | | |
Our effective tax rate in fiscal 2022 differs from the U.S. statutory rate of 21% primarily due to the income tax benefit for the release of a portion of our uncertain tax positions and the tax benefit associated with stock compensation deductions offset by tax expense from the change in fair value of contingent consideration and expense generated on the revaluation of the Company’s deferred state tax rate.
The income tax benefit of $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 was2022 primarily due torepresents the benefits arising fromstatutory tax rate offset by the release of uncertain tax positions and stock compensation deductions, nettedindemnification liabilities with the tax effect on income generated in the period and the accrual of interest associated with uncertain tax positions.BMS. In accordance with the Company’sour accounting policy, the change in the tax liability,liabilities, penalties and interest associated with theseour uncertain tax positions (net of any offsetting federal or state benefit) is recognized within income tax (benefit) expense. Contemporaneously,The majority of our uncertain tax positions are indemnified liabilities, in accordance with the Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement entered into with BMS in 2008. Changes in the liability result in offsetting changes in the taxindemnification receivable. Changes in the indemnification receivable are recognized within other expenseloss (income) in the consolidated statement of operations. Accordingly, as these reserves change, adjustments are included in income tax (benefit) expense with an offsetting adjustment included in other expense (income). Assuming that the receivable from BMS continues to be considered recoverable by the Company,us, there will be no effect on net income and no net cash outflows related to these liabilities. During 2022, the Company released a significant portion of its indemnified liability due to the settlement of these positions in various states at a cost significantly less than our accrual resulting in $9.6 million (net of federal or state benefit) income tax benefit. Refer to Note 5, Income Taxes.
The income tax expensebenefit of $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 20182021 was primarily due to incurred losses before tax, the income generatedrelease of a portion of our uncertain tax positions, stock compensation deductions, and tax credits, offset by non-deductible expenses related to the changes in the periodfair value of contingent assets and liabilities, the accrual of interest associated with uncertain tax positions, offset byand the releaseimpact of the valuation allowance againstan increased effective state tax rate on our Canada deferred tax assets and tax benefits arising from stock compensation deductions.
We regularly assess our ability to realize our deferred tax assets. Assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets requires significant management judgment. In determining whether our deferred tax assets are more-likely-than-not realizable, we evaluate all available positive and negative evidence, and weigh the objective evidence and expected impact. We released the full valuation allowance recorded against our Canada deferred tax assets during the year ended December 31, 2018. We continue to record a valuation allowance against certain of our foreignending net deferred tax assets.
Our effective tax rate for each reporting period is presented as follows:
|
| | | | | |
| | Year Ended
December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Effective tax rate | (10.6)% | | 18.2% | | (211.3)% |
Our effective tax rate in fiscal 2019 differs from the U.S. statutory rate of 21% principally due to the release of uncertain tax positions and stock compensation deductions, offset by the impact of U.S. state taxes and the accrual of interest on uncertain tax positions.
The decrease in the effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to the prior year period is primarily due to the release of uncertain tax positions in the current period.
Comparison of the Periods Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017
For a comparison of our results of operations for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, see “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on February 20, 2019.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows
The following table provides information regarding our cash flows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended
December 31, |
| (in thousands) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | | $ | 80,384 |
| | $ | 61,193 |
| | $ | 54,777 |
|
| Net cash used in investing activities | | $ | (22,061 | ) | | $ | (19,132 | ) | | $ | (16,309 | ) |
| Net cash used in financing activities | | $ | (78,881 | ) | | $ | (4,668 | ) | | $ | (13,450 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
December 31, |
| (in thousands) | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | | $ | 281,781 | | | $ | 53,916 | | | $ | 16,396 | |
| Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | | $ | (276,547) | | | $ | 3,683 | | | $ | (4,912) | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | $ | 311,691 | | | $ | (39,332) | | | $ | (21,861) | |
For a discussion of our liquidity and capital resources related to our cash flow activities for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,2020, see “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2021, filed with the SEC on February 20, 2019.
24, 2022.
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities of $80.4$281.8 million induring the year ended December 31, 20192022 was driven primarily bycomprised of net income adjusted for charges incurred in connection with acquired in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) and the net effect of $31.7 million plus $13.4 million ofnon-cash items such as depreciation, amortization and accretion expense, changesthe change in long-term income tax payablefair value of contingent assets and other long-term liabilities of $13.2$34.7 million (refer to Note 4, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments”, for further details on contingent consideration liabilities, including CVRs), and stock-based compensation expense of $12.5 million, changes in long-term income tax receivable of $10.6 million, changes in deferred taxes of $9.7 million and debt extinguishment expense of $3.2 million. These netexpense. The primary working capital sources of cash were further increased by a netthe increase of $9.0 million related to movements in ouraccruals associated with PYLARIFY sales. The primary working capital accounts duringuses of cash were an increase in trade receivables associated primarily with the period. The overall increasesincrease in cash from our working capital accounts were primarily driven by accrued expenses and the timing of purchases.PYLARIFY revenues.
Net cash provided by operating activities of $61.2$53.9 million induring the year ended December 31, 20182021 was driven primarily bycomprised of net incomeloss adjusted for the net effect of $40.5non-cash items such as the change in fair value of contingent assets and liabilities of $72.4 million plus $13.9 million(refer to Note 4, “Fair Value of depreciation, amortization and accretion expense, $8.7 million of stock-based compensation expense and changes in deferred taxes of $5.8 million. These netFinancial Instruments”, for further details on contingent consideration liabilities, including CVRs). The primary working capital sources of cash were offset by a net decreasethe timing of $14.0 million relatedpayments to movements in our working capital accounts during the period. The overall decreases in cash from our working capital accounts were primarily driven by the strategic inventory build during the period to mitigate sole supplier risklarge vendors as well as higher accounts receivable due to increasedan increase in billings associated with PYLARIFY sales. The primary working capital use of cash were an increase in trade receivables from timing of sale orders and an increase in collection period as well as the timing of inventory purchases.
Net Cash Used in(Used in) Provided by Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2019 reflected $22.12022 was primarily due to the $260.0 million inupfront payment to POINT and the $18.3 million of capital expenditures.expenditures partially offset by $1.8 million received from the sale of our Puerto Rico subsidiary.
Net cash used inprovided by investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2018 reflected $20.1 million in capital expenditures offset by the2021 was primarily due to cash proceeds of $1.0$15.8 million received from the sale of land.our Puerto Rico subsidiary, which was offset by $12.1 million of capital expenditures.
Net Cash Used inProvided by (Used in) Financing Activities
Net cash used inprovided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 20192022 is primarily attributable to the net cash outflowproceeds of approximately $73$557.8 million received from the issuance of the Notes, proceeds of $7.5 million from stock option exercises and proceeds of $5.6 million from the voluntarily terminated interest rate swap contracts in connection with the refinancing of our previous 2017 Facility,debt. These amounts were offset by payments on long-term debt and other borrowings of $5.0$175.0 million, related to the 2019 Term Facilityrepurchase of common stock of $75.0 million and payments for minimum statutory tax withholding related to net share settlement of equity awards of $2.5$7.8 million. Starting in 2019, we require certain senior executives to cover tax liabilities resulting from the vesting of their equity awards pursuant to sell-to-cover transactions under 10b5-1 plans.
Net cash used in financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2018 reflected2021 is primarily attributable to the payments on long-term debt and other borrowings of $43.3 million related to the 2019 Term Facility and Royalty-Backed Loan, including a voluntary repayment of the outstanding principal on the Royalty-Backed Loan and payments for minimum statutory tax withholding related to net share settlement of equity awards of $3.4 million, payments on long-term debt of $2.9$2.0 million offset by proceeds of $1.2$5.3 million from the exercise of stock options.option exercises.
External Sources of Liquidity
In JuneDecember 2022, we voluntarily repaid our 2019 we refinanced our 2017 $275$200.0 million five-year term loan facility with the 2019 Term Facility.facility. In addition, we replaced our $75$200.0 million revolving facility with the 20192022 Revolving Facility. The terms of the 20192022 Revolving Facility are set forth in the Credit Agreement, dated as of June 27, 2019,December 2, 2022, by and among us, the lenders from time to time party thereto and Wells FargoCitizens Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent.agent (the “2022 Credit Agreement”). We have the right to request an increase to the 2019 Term2022 Revolver Facility or request the establishment of one or more new incremental term loan facilities, in an aggregate principal amount of up to $100$335 million or consolidated EBITDA for the four consecutive fiscal quarters most recently ended, plus additional amounts, in certain circumstances.
We are permittedThe Company used approximately $7.8 million of cash on hand to voluntarily prepayprimarily repay the principal amount of the loans outstanding related to the 2019 Term Loans,Facility through the nine months ended September 30, 2022. In addition, in whole orDecember 2022, the Company used approximately $167.6 million of cash on hand to repay in part, without premium or penalty. The 2019 Term Facility requires us to make mandatory prepaymentsfull the aggregate remaining principal amount of the loans outstanding under the 2019 Term Loans in certain circumstances. The 2019 Term Facility amortizes at 5.00% per year through September 30, 2022 and 7.5% thereafter, until its June 27, 2024 maturity date.to pay related interest, transaction fees and expenses.
Under the terms of the 20192022 Revolving Facility, the lenders thereunder agreed to extend credit to us from time to time until June 27, 2024December 2, 2027 consisting of revolving loans in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $200$350.0 million at any time outstanding.time. The 20192022 Revolving Facility includes a $20$20.0 million sub-facility for the issuance of Lettersletters of Credit.credit (the “Letters of Credit”). The 20192022 Revolving Facility includes a $10$10.0 million sub-facility for Swingline Loans.swingline loans (the “Swingline Loans”). The Letters of Credit, Swingline Loans and the borrowings under the 20192022 Revolving Facility are expected to be used for working capital and other general corporate purposes.
Please refer to Note 11, Long-term debt, net13, “Long-Term Debt, Net, and other borrowings,Other Borrowings” for further details on the 20192022 Facility.
As of December 31, 2022, we were in compliance with all financial and other covenants under the 2022 Credit Agreement.
On December 8, 2022, we issued $575.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the Notes, which includes $75.0 million in aggregate principal amount of Notes sold pursuant to the full exercise of the initial purchasers’ option to purchase additional Notes. The Notes were issued under an indenture, dated as of December 8, 2022 (the “Indenture”), among the Company, LMI, as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank, as Trustee. The net proceeds from the issuance of the Notes were approximately $557.8 million, after deducting the initial purchasers’ discounts and offering expenses payable by us.
On March 31, 2021, we voluntarily repaid in full the entire outstanding principal on outstanding debt of Progenics that we assumed as a result of the Progenics Acquisition. The total amount we paid was $30.9 million, which included a prepayment amount of $0.5 million.
Our ability to fund our future capital needs will be affected by our ability to continue to generate cash from operations and may be affected by our ability to access the capital markets, money markets or other sources of funding, as well as the capacity and terms of our financing arrangements.
We may from time to time repurchase or otherwise retire our debt and take other steps to reduce our debt or otherwise improve our balance sheet. These actions may include prepayments of our term loans or other retirements or refinancing of outstanding debt, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. The amount of debt that may be retired, if any, could be material and would be decided at the sole discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on market conditions, our cash position and other considerations.
Funding Requirements
Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:
•The costsamount and timing of acquiring or in-licensing, developing, obtaining regulatory approval for, and commercializing, new products, businesses or technologies, together with the costs of pursuing opportunities that are not eventually consummated;calculated cash payment related to the CVRs;
•The pricing environment and the level of product sales and the pricing environment of our currently marketed products, particularly PYLARIFY and DEFINITY, andas well as any additional products that we may market in the future;
•Revenue mix shifts and associated volume and selling price changes that could result from contractual status changes with key customers and additional competition;
•The continued costs of the ongoing commercialization of PYLARIFY and PYLARIFY AI;
•The costs of acquiring or in-licensing, developing, obtaining regulatory approval for, and commercializing, new products, businesses or technologies, including any potential related milestone or royalty payments, together with the costs of pursuing opportunities that are not eventually consummated;
•Our investment in the further clinical development and commercialization of existing products and development candidates;candidates, including PNT2002, PNT2003, 1095 and NM-01;
•The costs of investing in our facilities, equipment and technology infrastructure;
•The costs and timing of establishing or amending manufacturing and supply arrangements for commercial supplies of our products and raw materials and components;
•Our ability to have productproducts manufactured and released from JHS and other manufacturing sites in a timely manner in the future;future, or to manufacture products at our in-house manufacturing facilities in amounts sufficient to meet our supply needs;
•The costs of further commercialization of our existing products, particularly in international markets, including product marketing, sales and distribution and whether we obtain local partners to help share such commercialization costs;
•The extent to which we choose to establish collaboration, co-promotion, distribution or other similar arrangements for our marketed products;
•The legal costs relating to maintaining, expanding and enforcing our intellectual property portfolio, pursuing insurance or other claims and defending against product liability, regulatory compliance, intellectual property or other claims; and
•The cost of interest on any additional borrowings which we may incur under our financing arrangements.arrangements; and
Until we successfully become dual sourced for•The impact of sustained inflation on our principal products, wecosts of goods sold and operating expenses.
We are vulnerable to future supply shortages.shortages, especially for our single sourced products. Disruption in our financial performance could also occur if we experience significant adverse changes in product or customer mix, broad economic downturns, sustained inflation, adverse industry or company conditions or catastrophic external events, including pandemics such as COVID-19, natural disasters and political or military conflict. If we experience one or more of these events in the future, we may be required to further implement expense reductions, such as a delay or elimination of discretionary spending in all functional areas, as well as scaling back select operating and strategic initiatives.
If our capital resources become insufficient to meet our future capital requirements, we would need to finance our cash needs through public or private equity offerings, debt financings, assets securitizations, sale-leasebacks or other financing or strategic alternatives, to the extent such transactions are permissible under the covenants of our 2022 Credit Agreement. Additional equity or debt financing, or other transactions, may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. If any of these transactions require an amendment or waiver under the covenants in our 2022 Credit Agreement, which could result in additional expenses associated with obtaining the amendment or waiver, we will seek to obtain such a waiver to remain in compliance with those covenants. However, we cannot be assured that such an amendment or waiver would be granted, or that additional capital will be available on acceptable terms, if at all.
At December 31, 2019,2022, our only current committed external source of funds is our borrowing availability under our 20192022 Revolving Facility. We had $92.9$415.7 million of cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2019.2022. Our 20192022 Revolving Facility contains a number of affirmative, negative, reporting and financial covenants, in each case subject to certain exceptions and materiality thresholds. Incremental borrowings under the 20192022 Revolving Facility may affect our ability to comply with the covenants in the 2019 Facility, including the financial covenants restricting consolidated net leverage and interest coverage. Accordingly, we may be limited in utilizing the full amount of our 20192022 Revolving Facility as a source of liquidity.
In addition, in connection with the Progenics Transaction, which we expect to close in the second quarter of 2020, although the merger is structured as a stock-for-stock exchange, we will incur legal, accounting, financial advisory, consulting and printing fees, and transition, integration and other costs which we intend to fund from our available cash and the available cash of Progenics. The
CVRs we will issueissued in the Progenics Transaction willAcquisition entitle holders thereof to future cash payments of 40% of PyLPYLARIFY net sales over $100(i) $100.0 million in 2022 and $150(ii) $150.0 million in 2023 which, if payable,(but in no event will our aggregate payments under the CVRs,
together with any other non-stock consideration treated as paid in connection with the Progenics Acquisition, exceed 19.9% of the total consideration we currently intendpay in the Progenics Acquisition). Refer to fund from our then-available cash.Note 4, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments”, for further details on contingent consideration liabilities. Based on PYLARIFY net sales for 2022, we determined that the aggregate payment obligation under the CVRs was $99.7 million. We expect to make that payment during the first half of 2023.
Based on our current operating plans, we believe that our existingbalance of cash and cash equivalents, resultswhich totaled $415.7 million as of December 31, 2022, along with cash generated by ongoing operations and availability undercontinued access to our 20192022 Revolving Facility, will be sufficient to continue to fundsatisfy our liquiditycash requirements forover the foreseeable future.next twelve months and beyond. Our material cash requirements include the following contractual and other obligations.
Contractual Obligations
Contractual obligations represent future cash commitments and liabilities under agreements with third parties and exclude contingent contractual liabilities for which we cannot reasonably predict future payment, including contingencies related to potential future development, financing, certain suppliers, contingent royalty payments and/or scientific, regulatory, or commercial milestone payments under development agreements. The following table summarizes our contractual obligations asWe completed a sale of $575.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the Notes due in 2027. As of December 31, 2019:2022, we had no amounts of principal due within the next twelve months. Future interest payments associated with the Notes total $76.2 million, with $16.3 million payable within twelve months.
Leases
We have operating lease arrangements for certain facilities, including corporate and manufacturing space. As of December 31, 2022, we had fixed operating lease payment obligations of $33.7 million, with $3.5 million payable within twelve months.
We have lease arrangements for certain equipment. As of December 31, 2022, we had fixed finance lease payment obligations of $0.6 million, with $0.4 million payable within twelve months.
Purchase Obligations
We have purchase obligations that primarily consist of noncancelable obligations related to minimum quantities of goods or services that have been committed to be purchased on an annual basis. As of December 31, 2022, we had minimum purchase obligations of $16.6 million, with $5.7 million due within twelve months.
License Agreements
We have entered into license agreements in which fixed payments have been committed to be paid on an annual basis. As of December 31, 2022, we had fixed license payments of $0.1 million, with $0.1 million due within twelve months. These amounts do not include potential milestone or contractual payment obligations contingent upon the achievement or occurrence of future milestones or events under our license agreements, because they are contingent and the amounts and timing of such potential obligations are unknown or uncertain. We may be required to pay additional amounts up to approximately $200.0 million in contingent payments under our license agreements.
Asset Acquisition
During 2022, we entered into the POINT License Agreements, in which we made upfront payments of $260.0 million, and under which we may make additional milestone payments. The additional milestone payments are based on FDA approval and net sales and commercial milestones. Under the terms of the PNT2002 License Agreement, we have the potential to pay up to an additional $281 million in milestone payments and up to $1.3 billion in sales milestone payments upon the achievement of specified annual sales thresholds. Under the terms of the PNT2003 License Agreement, we have the potential to pay an additional $34.5 million in milestone payments and up to $275.0 million in sales milestone payments upon the achievement of specified annual sales thresholds. In total, we may be required to pay up to approximately $1.8 billion related to the asset acquisition. As of December 31, 2022, these contingent payments were not expected to be payable due to the uncertainty around the timing of the future cash flows.
Other Long-Term Liabilities
Our other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet include the fair values of contingent consideration liabilities including contingent consideration liabilities related to a previous acquisition completed by Progenics in 2013. We may be required to pay up to approximately $85.0 million related to the contingent consideration. As of December 31, 2022, these contingent payments were not expected to be payable within twelve months due to the uncertainty around the timing of the future cash flows.
Our other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet include unrecognized tax benefits and related interest and penalties. As of December 31, 2022, we had unrecognized tax benefits of $8.3 million, which included interest and penalties, classified as noncurrent liabilities. At this time, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the timing of payments in individual years in connection with these tax liabilities.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Payments Due by Period |
| (in thousands) | Total | | Less than 1 Year | | 1 - 3 Years | | 3 -5 Years | | More than 5 Years |
| Debt obligations (principal) | $ | 195,000 |
| | $ | 10,000 |
| | $ | 21,250 |
| | $ | 163,750 |
| | $ | — |
|
Interest on debt obligations(a) | 27,334 |
| | 6,872 |
| | 12,622 |
| | 7,840 |
| | — |
|
Operating lease obligations(b) | 1,130 |
| | 238 |
| | 476 |
| | 416 |
| | — |
|
Purchase obligations(c) | 10,330 |
| | 4,132 |
| | 6,198 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Finance lease obligations | 354 |
| | 135 |
| | 219 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Other long-term liabilities(d) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Asset retirement obligations(e) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total contractual obligations | $ | 234,148 |
| | $ | 21,377 |
| | $ | 40,765 |
| | $ | 172,006 |
| | $ | — |
|
| |
(a) | Amounts relate to the estimated interest under our 2019 Term Facility based on interest rates in effect as of December 31, 2019. |
| |
(b) | Operating leases include minimum payments under leases for our facilities. |
| |
(c) | Excludes purchase orders for inventory in the normal course of business. |
| |
(d) | Our other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet include unrecognized tax benefits and related interest and penalties. As of December 31, 2019, we had unrecognized tax benefits of $27.0 million, which included interest and penalties, classified as noncurrent liabilities. At this time, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the timing of payments in individual years in connection with these tax liabilities; therefore, such amounts are not included in the above contractual obligation table.
|
| |
(e) | We have excluded asset retirement obligations from the table above due to the uncertainty of the timing of the future cash outflows related to the decommissioning of our radioactive operations. As of December 31, 2019, the liability, which was approximately $12.9 million, was measured at the present value of the obligation expected to be incurred of approximately $26.9 million.
|
Off-Balance Sheet ArrangementsAsset Retirement Obligation
We are required to provide the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Massachusetts Department of Public Health and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection financial assurance demonstrating our ability to fund the decommissioning of our North Billerica, Massachusetts and Somerset, New Jersey production facilityfacilities upon closure, thoughalthough we do not intendhave no current plans to close the facility.facilities. We have provided this financial assurance in the form of a $28.2$30.3 million surety bond.bond (the “Surety Bond”). As of December 31, 2022, the liability, which was approximately $22.5 million, was measured at the present value of the obligation expected to be incurred of approximately $25.1 million. These contingent payments are not expected to be payable within twelve months due to the uncertainty around the timing of the future cash flows related to the decommissioning of our radioactive operations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As noted above, we have provided the Surety Bond to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health and New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Since inception, we have not engaged in any other off-balance sheet arrangements, including structured finance, special purpose entities or variable interest entities.
Effects of Inflation
We do not believe that inflation has had a significant impact on our revenues or results of operations since inception.operations. We expect our cost of product sales and other operating expenses will change in the future in line with periodic inflationary changes in price levels. Because we intend to retain and continue to use our property and equipment, we believe that the incremental inflation related to the replacement costs of those items will not materially affect our operations. However, the rate of inflation affects our expenses, such as those for employee compensation and contract services, which could increase our level of expenses and the rate at which we use our resources. While we generally believe that we will be able to offset some of the effect of price-level changes by adjusting our product prices and implementing operating efficiencies, any material unfavorable changes in price levels could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Recent Accounting Standards
Refer to Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in the accompanying consolidated financial statements located under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information regarding recently issued accounting standards that may have a significant impact on our business.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements require us to make estimates and judgments that affect our reported assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and other financial information. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions. In addition, our reported financial condition and results of operations could vary due to a change in the application of a particular accounting standard.
We believe the following represent our critical accounting policies and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements.
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
We adopted ASC 606 on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method for all contracts not completed as of the date of adoption. The reported results for 2019 and 2018 reflect the application of ASC 606 guidance while the reported results for 2017 were prepared under the guidance of ASC 605, Revenue Recognition (“ASC 605”). For our accounting policy for revenue recognition under ASC 605, refer to Item 8 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. The adoption of ASC 606 did not have a material impact on our consolidated balance sheet, results of operations, equity or cash flows as of the adoption date or for the periods presented.
Revenue is measured based on a consideration specified in a contract with a customer, and excludes any sales incentives and amounts collected on behalf of third parties. We recognize revenue when we satisfy our performance obligations by transferring control over products or services to our customers. The amount of revenue we recognize reflects the consideration to which we expect to be entitled to receive in exchange for these goods or services. To achieve this core principle, we apply the following five steps: (1) identify the contracts with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) we satisfy performance obligations.
We derive our revenues through arrangements with customers for product sales as well as licensing and royalty arrangements. We sell our products principallyprimarily to hospitals, independent diagnostic testing facilities, government facilities, integrated delivery networks, radiopharmacies, clinics, and clinics, radiopharmacies, and distributorsgroup practices, and we consider customer purchase orders, which in some cases are governed by master sales or group purchasing organization agreements, to be contracts with our customers. In addition to these arrangements, we also enter into licensing agreements under which we license certain rights to third parties. The terms of these arrangements typically include payment to us of one or more of the following: non-refundable, up-front license fees; development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments; and royalties on net sales of licensed products. We analyze various factors requiring management judgment when applying the five-step model to our contracts with customers.
Our product revenues are recorded at the net sales price (transaction price), which represents our sales price less estimates related to reserves which are established for items such as discounts, returns, rebates and allowances that may be provided for in certain contracts with our customers. Judgment is used in determining and updating our reserves on an on-goingongoing basis, and where appropriate, these estimates take into consideration a range of possible outcomes which are probability-weighted for relevant factors such as our historical experience, current contractual and statutory requirements, specific known market events and trends, industry data and forecasted customer buying and payment patterns. Overall, these reserves reflect the Company’sour best estimates of the amount of consideration to which it is entitled based on the terms of the contract. Actual amounts of consideration ultimately received may differ from the Company’sour estimates.
For our licensing and royalty arrangements, we use judgment in determining the number of performance obligations in a license agreement by assessing whether the license is distinct or should be combined with another performance obligation as well as the nature of the license. As part of the accounting for these arrangements, we develop assumptions that require judgment to determine the stand-alone selling price for each performance obligation identified in a contract. These key assumptions may include market conditions, reimbursement rates for personnel costs, development timelines and probabilities of regulatory success.
Income TaxesBusiness Combinations
We account for income taxesbusiness combinations using an assetthe acquisition method of accounting. We recognize the assets acquired and liability approach. Income tax (benefit) expense represents income taxes paid or payable forliabilities assumed in business combinations on the current year plusbasis of their fair values at the change in deferred taxes duringdate of acquisition. We assess the year. Deferred taxes result from differences between the financial and tax basesfair value of our assets and liabilities. Deferred taxacquired, including intangible assets, and liabilities assumed using a variety of methods. Each asset acquired and liability assumed is measured at fair value from the perspective of a market participant. The method used to estimate the fair values of intangible assets incorporates significant assumptions regarding the estimates a market participant would make in order to evaluate an asset, including a market participant’s use of the asset and the appropriate discount rates. Acquired IPR&D is recognized at fair value and initially characterized as an indefinite-lived intangible asset, irrespective of whether the acquired IPR&D has an alternative future use. Any excess purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired is allocated to goodwill. Transaction costs and restructuring costs associated with a business combination are measured using the currently enacted tax rates that applyexpensed as incurred.
The fair values assigned to taxable income in effect for the years in which those tax attributestangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed are expected to be recovered or paid, and are adjusted for changes in tax rates and tax laws when such changes are enacted.
On December 22, 2017, the United States enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Act”). The Act is significant and has wide-ranging effects. The primary material impact to the Company wasbased on our net U.S. deferred tax assets, which were reducedestimates and assumptions, as well as other information we have compiled, including valuations that utilize customary valuation procedures and techniques. If the actual results differ from the estimates and assumptions used in these estimates, it could result in a resultpossible impairment of the reduction in U.S. corporate tax rates from 35% to 21% for years beginning on or after January 1, 2018. We recorded taxintangible assets and goodwill, a required acceleration of the amortization expense of $45.1 million duringfinite-lived intangible assets or the year ended December 31, 2017, to reflect the impactrecognition of the Act on our net deferred tax assets carrying value. We have reviewed the guidance issued by the U.S. Treasury concerning the repatriation transition tax. The repatriation transition tax impacted U.S. entities with accumulated yet unrepatriated or 'untaxed' foreign earnings. As of December 31, 2017, we had no accumulated unrepatriated foreign earnings, and therefore were not affected by the new provisions of the Act concerning the repatriation transition tax.
We regularly assess our ability to realize our deferred tax assets, and that assessment requires significant management judgment. In determining whether our deferred tax assets are more-likely-than-not realizable, we evaluate all available positive and negative evidence, and weigh that evidence based on its objective verifiability and expected impact.additional consideration, which would be expensed.
During the fourth quarter of 2017,measurement period, which extends no later than one year from the acquisition date, we determined, based on our considerationmay record certain adjustments to the carrying value of the weight of positiveassets acquired and negative evidence, that there was sufficient positive evidence that our U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets were more-likely-than-not realizable as of December 31, 2017. Our conclusion was primarily driven byliabilities assumed with the achievement of a sustained level of profitability,corresponding offset to goodwill. After the expectation of sustained future profitability, and mitigating factors related to external supplier and customer risk sufficient to outweigh the available negative evidence. Accordingly, we released the valuation allowance previously recorded against our U.S. net deferred tax assets resulting in an income tax benefit of $141.1 million. We have continued to assess the level of the valuation allowance required and if the weight of negative evidence exists in future periods to again support the recording of a partial or full valuation allowance against our U.S. deferred tax assets, that would likely have a material negative impact on our results of operations in that future period.
During the fourth quarter of 2018, we further determined that there was sufficient positive evidence that our Canada deferred tax assets were more-likely-than-not realizable as of December 31, 2018. Our conclusion was primarily driven by the achievement of a sustained level of profitability and the expectation of sustained future profitability. Accordingly, we released the valuation allowance previously recorded against our Canada net deferred tax assets resulting in an income tax benefit of $4.0 million. We continue to maintain a valuation allowance of $1.2 million on foreign net deferred tax assets generated where there is still an insufficient history of cumulative profitability in the relevant jurisdiction.
We account for uncertain tax positions using a recognition threshold and measurement analysis method for determining the financial statement impact of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Differences between tax positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in the financial statementsperiod, all adjustments are recorded as adjustments to income taxes payable or receivable, or adjustments to deferred taxes, or both. We record the related interest and penalties to income tax (benefit) expense.
We have a tax indemnification agreement with BMS related to certain uncertain tax positions that arose prior to the acquisition of the business from BMS. The uncertain tax positions are recognized as long-term liabilities, and a tax indemnification receivable is recognized within other long-term assets. Changes in the tax indemnification receivable are recognized within other expense (income) in the consolidated statements of operations as operating expenses or income.
Intangible and Long-Lived Assets
We test intangible and long-lived assets for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying value of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. We measure the recoverability of assets to be held and used by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If those assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment equals the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Any impairments are recorded as permanent reductions in the carrying amount of the assets. Long-lived assets, other than goodwill and other intangible assets, that are held for sale are recorded at the lower of the carrying value or the fair market value less the estimated cost to sell.
Intangible assets, consisting of trademarks, customer relationships, currently marketed products, licenses and developed technology are amortized in a method equivalent to the estimated utilization of the economic benefit of the asset.
Costs of IPR&D intangible assets acquired as part of an asset acquisition that have no alternative future use are expensed when incurred. Milestone payments made after regulatory approval are capitalized as an intangible asset and amortized over an estimated useful life of the product. Cash payments related to acquired IPR&D intangible assets are reflected as an investing cash flow in the Company's consolidated statement of cash flows.
Our IPR&D intangible assets include intangible assets acquired in a business combination that are used in research and development activities but have not yet reached technological feasibility, regardless of whether they have alternative future use. The primary basis for determining the technological feasibility or completion of these projects is whether we have obtained regulatory approval to market the underlying products in an applicable geographic region. Because obtaining regulatory approval can include significant risks and uncertainties, the eventual realized value of the acquired IPR&D projects may vary from their fair value at the date of acquisition. We classify IPR&D intangible assets acquired in a business combination as an indefinite-lived intangible asset
until the completion or abandonment of the associated research and development efforts. Upon completion of the associated research and development efforts, we will determine the useful life and begin amortizing the assets to reflect their use over their remaining lives. Upon permanent abandonment, we write-off the remaining carrying amount of the associated IPR&D intangible asset. We test our IPR&D intangible assets at least annually or when a triggering event occurs that could indicate a potential impairment and we recognize any impairment loss in our consolidated statements of operations.
Contingent Consideration Liabilities
The Progenics Acquisition included certain contingent consideration liabilities, including CVRs, as well as other contingent future payments. CVRs are based on net sales generated by PYLARIFY in both 2022 and 2023, subject to a cap. Other contingent future payments are based on net sales targets for 1095 and AZEDRA and include a commercialization milestone for 1095. The estimated fair value of contingent consideration liabilities, initially measured and recorded on the acquisition date, are considered to be a Level 3 instrument and are reviewed quarterly, or whenever events or circumstances occur that indicate a change in fair value. The contingent consideration liabilities are recorded at fair value at the end of each reporting period with changes in estimated fair values recorded in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
The estimated fair value is determined based on probability adjusted discounted cash flows or Monte Carlo simulation models that include significant estimates and assumptions pertaining to the period of expected milestone achievement, probability of success, discount rates and sales targets. The most significant unobservable inputs are the probabilities of achieving regulatory approval of the development projects and subsequent commercial success.
Significant changes in any of the probabilities of success would result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. Significant changes in the liabilities are recorded within the tax provision. Accordingly,probabilities as these reserves change, adjustments are included in income tax (benefit) expense with an offsetting adjustment included in other expense (income). Assuming that we continue to consider the receivable from BMS to be fully recoverable, there is no net effect on net income related to these liabilities and no net cash outflows.
During the fourth quarter of 2019, we reassessed the indemnified uncertain tax positions and obtained, with the assistance of third-party tax experts, additional technical insights with respect to the indemnified uncertain tax positions. On the basis of new information, we changed our estimate with respect to some of the indemnified uncertain tax positions. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we released $17.1 million of the liability for uncertain tax positions, including $12.7 million of accrued interest and penalties, recorded to income tax (benefit) expense, offset byperiods in which milestones will be achieved would result in a reduction in deferred tax assets of $3.3 million and a $13.8 million reduction of the indemnification receivable recorded in other expense (income).significantly lower or higher fair value measurement.
The calculation of our uncertain tax positions involves certain estimates, assumptions and the application of complex tax regulations in multiple jurisdictions worldwide. Any material change in our estimates or assumptions, or the tax regulations, may have a material impact on our results of operations.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. Beginning in 2019, weWe may from time to time use derivative financial instruments or other financial instruments to hedge these economic exposures related to foreign currencies. We do not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes.
Interest Rate Risk
Under our 2019 Facility, we have substantial variable rate debt. Fluctuations in interest rates may affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. As of December 31, 2019, we had $195.0 million outstanding principal under our 2019 Term Facility with variable interest rates.
Furthermore, weWe are subject to interest rate risk in connection with our 20192022 Revolving Facility, which is variable rate indebtedness. Interest rate changes could increase the amount of our interest payments and thus negatively impact our future earnings and cash flows. As of December 31, 2019,2022, there was availability of $200.0$350.0 million on the 20192022 Revolving Facility. Any increase in the interest rate under the 20192022 Revolving Facility may have a negative impact on our future earnings to the extent we have outstanding borrowings under the 20192022 Revolving Facility. The effect
We had used interest rate swaps to reduce the variability in cash flows associated with a portion of a 100 basis points adverse change in marketour forecasted interest ratespayments on our 2019 Term Facility, in excess of applicable minimum floors, onits variable rate debt. We voluntarily terminated our interest expense would be approximately $2.4 million.
Historically, we have not used derivative financial instruments or other financial instruments to hedge such economic exposures.rate swap contracts on December 2, 2022.
Foreign Currency Risk
We face exposure to movements in foreign currency exchange rates whenever we, or any of our subsidiaries, enter into transactions with third parties that are denominated in currencies other than ours,our, or that subsidiary’s, functional currency. Intercompany transactions between entities that use different functional currencies also expose us to foreign currency risk.
During the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017,2020, the net impact of foreign currency changes on transactions was a gain of less than $0.1 million, a loss of $0.6 million and a gain of $0.3 million respectively. In 2019,for all years presented. From time to time, we have enteredenter into foreign currency forward contracts primarily to reduce the effects of fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates. We may enter into additional foreign currency forward contracts when deemed appropriate. We do not enter into foreign currency forward contracts for speculative or trading purposes.
The Canadian dollar presents the primary currency risk on our earnings. At December 31, 2019,2022, a hypothetical 10% change in value of the U.S. dollar relative to the Canadian dollar would not have materially affected our financial instruments.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
LANTHEUS HOLDINGS, INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lantheus Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity, (deficit), and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 25, 2020,23, 2023, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the USU.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditsaudit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Asset Retirement Obligations -Accounting for Convertible Notes— Refer to Notes 2 and 813 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company records asset retirement obligations associated with relevant federal, state, local, and foreign environmental laws and regulations that may requireOn December 8, 2022, the Company issued $575 million in aggregate principal amount of 2.625% Convertible Senior Notes due 2027 (the “Notes”), which includes $75 million in aggregate principal amount of Notes sold pursuant to remove or mitigate the effectsfull exercise of the disposal or release of chemical substances in jurisdictions whereinitial purchasers’ option to purchase additional Notes. The Notes include conversion and redemption features that the Company does business or maintains properties. The Company establishes accruals when those costs are legally obligated and candetermined should not be reasonably estimated. The asset retirement obligations are estimated, which may include the assistance of third-party environmental specialists, and are based on currently available information, regulatory requirements, remediation strategies, historical experience, the relative shares of the total remediation costs, a relevant discount rate, and the time periods of when estimated costs can be reasonably predicted. The asset retirement obligations balance was $12.9 millionbifurcated as of December 31, 2019.derivative instruments.
We identified asset retirement obligations relatedthe accounting for the conversion feature and redemption features of the Notes to the decommissioning of certain facilities asbe a critical audit matter becausegiven the expected costs involve significant estimation by managementcomplexity in order to comply with relevant regulatory requirements. Thisapplying the accounting framework, including the determination of whether those features of the Notes should be bifurcated from the Notes and accounted for separately as a derivative instrument. The complexities required a high degree of auditor judgementjudgment and an increased extent of audit effort, including the need to involve environmental specialists.
professionals in our firm with specialized skills and knowledge in the accounting for financial instruments.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to management’s judgments of the asset retirement obligationsaccounting treatment of the conversion and redemption features of the Notes included the following among others:
•We tested the design and effectiveness of controls related to the determination of asset retirement obligations, including management’sinternal controls over the reviewevaluation of the expected decommissioning costs used in the determinationfeatures of the asset retirement obligations.Notes and the related accounting conclusions.
We evaluated the methods and assumptions used by management to estimate the expected decommissioning costs used in the determination of the asset retirement obligations.
We made inquiries of management regarding the relevant regulatory requirements.
•With the assistance of auditor specialists who have expertiseprofessionals in environmental matters andour firm with specialized skills and training, we:knowledge in financial instruments we evaluated the appropriateness of the accounting conclusions, including the accounting for the conversion and redemption features.
•We tested the completeness and accuracy of the Notes terms and assumptions utilized in the accounting conclusions through comparison to the underlying agreements and supporting documentation.
| |
– | Evaluated the relevant professional experience of management’s third-party environmental specialist. |
| |
– | Evaluated the completeness of the expected decommissioning costs by conducting a search of new or revised relevant regulatory requirements that would impact the Company’s cost estimate. |
| |
– | Evaluated the accuracy of management’s methods and assumptions to estimate the cost to remove, mitigate, or remediate the effects of the disposal or release of chemical substances through comparison of the expected decommissioning costs with the relevant regulatory requirements. |
|
|
| /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP |
Boston, Massachusetts |
| Boston, Massachusetts |
February 25, 202023, 2023 |
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2007.
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except par value) | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
| Assets | | | |
| Current assets | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 415,652 | | | $ | 98,508 | |
| Accounts receivable, net | 213,397 | | | 89,336 | |
| Inventory | 35,475 | | | 35,129 | |
| Other current assets | 13,092 | | | 12,818 | |
| | | |
| Total current assets | 677,616 | | | 235,791 | |
| Property, plant and equipment, net | 122,166 | | | 116,772 | |
| Intangibles, net | 315,285 | | | 348,510 | |
| Goodwill | 61,189 | | | 61,189 | |
| Deferred tax assets, net | 110,647 | | | 62,764 | |
| Other long-term assets | 34,355 | | | 38,758 | |
| Total assets | $ | 1,321,258 | | | $ | 863,784 | |
| Liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | | |
| Current liabilities | | | |
| Current portion of long-term debt and other borrowings | $ | 354 | | | $ | 11,642 | |
| | | |
| Accounts payable | 20,563 | | | 20,787 | |
| Short-term contingent liability | 99,700 | | | — | |
| Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 127,084 | | | 58,068 | |
| | | |
| Total current liabilities | 247,701 | | | 90,497 | |
| Asset retirement obligations | 22,543 | | | 20,833 | |
| Long-term debt, net and other borrowings | 557,712 | | | 163,121 | |
| Other long-term liabilities | 46,155 | | | 124,894 | |
| Total liabilities | 874,111 | | | 399,345 | |
| Commitments and contingencies (see Note 20) | | | |
| Stockholders’ equity | | | |
| Preferred stock ($0.01 par value, 25,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding) | — | | | — | |
| Common stock ($0.01 par value, 250,000 shares authorized; 68,851 and 67,739 shares issued as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively) | 689 | | | 677 | |
| Additional paid-in capital | 715,875 | | | 685,472 | |
| Treasury Stock at cost - 1,339 and no shares as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively | (75,000) | | | — | |
| Accumulated deficit | (193,158) | | | (221,225) | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (1,259) | | | (485) | |
| Total stockholders’ equity | 447,147 | | | 464,439 | |
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 1,321,258 | | | $ | 863,784 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Assets | | | |
| Current assets | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 92,919 |
| | $ | 113,401 |
|
| Accounts receivable, net | 43,529 |
| | 43,753 |
|
| Inventory | 29,180 |
| | 33,019 |
|
| Other current assets | 7,283 |
| | 5,242 |
|
| Total current assets | 172,911 |
| | 195,415 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment, net | 116,497 |
| | 107,888 |
|
| Intangibles, net | 7,336 |
| | 9,133 |
|
| Goodwill | 15,714 |
| | 15,714 |
|
| Deferred tax assets, net | 71,834 |
| | 81,449 |
|
| Other long-term assets | 21,627 |
| | 30,232 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 405,919 |
| | $ | 439,831 |
|
| Liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | | |
| Current liabilities | | | |
| Current portion of long-term debt and other borrowings | $ | 10,143 |
| | $ | 2,750 |
|
| Accounts payable | 18,608 |
| | 17,955 |
|
| Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 37,360 |
| | 32,050 |
|
| Total current liabilities | 66,111 |
| | 52,755 |
|
| Asset retirement obligations | 12,883 |
| | 11,572 |
|
| Long-term debt, net and other borrowings | 183,927 |
| | 263,709 |
|
| Other long-term liabilities | 28,397 |
| | 40,793 |
|
| Total liabilities | 291,318 |
| | 368,829 |
|
| Commitments and contingencies (see Note 15) |
| |
|
| Stockholders’ equity | | | |
| Preferred stock ($0.01 par value, 25,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding) | — |
| | — |
|
| Common stock ($0.01 par value, 250,000 shares authorized; 39,251 and 38,466 shares issued and outstanding, respectively) | 393 |
| | 385 |
|
| Additional paid-in capital | 251,641 |
| | 239,865 |
|
| Accumulated deficit | (136,473 | ) | | (168,140 | ) |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (960 | ) | | (1,108 | ) |
| Total stockholders’ equity | 114,601 |
| | 71,002 |
|
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 405,919 |
| | $ | 439,831 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share data) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
December 31, |
| | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Revenues | $ | 935,061 | | | $ | 425,208 | | | $ | 339,410 | |
| Cost of goods sold | 353,358 | | | 237,513 | | | 200,649 | |
| Gross profit | 581,703 | | | 187,695 | | | 138,761 | |
| Operating expenses | | | | | |
| Sales and marketing | 100,243 | | | 68,422 | | | 40,901 | |
| General and administrative | 133,584 | | | 150,395 | | | 69,270 | |
| Research and development | 311,681 | | | 44,966 | | | 32,788 | |
| Total operating expenses | 545,508 | | | 263,783 | | | 142,959 | |
| Gain on sales of assets | — | | | 15,263 | | | — | |
| Operating income (loss) | 36,195 | | | (60,825) | | | (4,198) | |
| Interest expense | 7,185 | | | 7,752 | | | 9,479 | |
| | | | | |
| Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt | 588 | | | (889) | | | — | |
| Other loss (income) | 1,703 | | | 7,350 | | | (2,198) | |
| Income (loss) before income taxes | 26,719 | | | (75,038) | | | (11,479) | |
| Income tax (benefit) expense | (1,348) | | | (3,759) | | | 1,994 | |
| Net income (loss) | $ | 28,067 | | | $ | (71,279) | | | $ | (13,473) | |
| Net income (loss) per common share: | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 0.41 | | | $ | (1.06) | | | $ | (0.25) | |
| Diluted | $ | 0.40 | | | $ | (1.06) | | | $ | (0.25) | |
| Weighted-average common shares outstanding: | | | | | |
| Basic | 68,487 | | | 67,486 | | | 54,134 | |
| Diluted | 70,671 | | | 67,486 | | | 54,134 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Revenues | $ | 347,337 |
| | $ | 343,374 |
| | $ | 331,378 |
|
| Cost of goods sold | 172,526 |
| | 168,489 |
| | 169,243 |
|
| Gross profit | 174,811 |
| | 174,885 |
| | 162,135 |
|
| Operating expenses | | | | | |
| Sales and marketing | 41,888 |
| | 43,159 |
| | 42,315 |
|
| General and administrative | 61,244 |
| | 50,167 |
| | 49,842 |
|
| Research and development | 20,018 |
| | 17,071 |
| | 18,125 |
|
| Total operating expenses | 123,150 |
| | 110,397 |
| | 110,282 |
|
| Operating income | 51,661 |
| | 64,488 |
| | 51,853 |
|
| Interest expense | 13,617 |
| | 17,405 |
| | 18,410 |
|
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | 3,196 |
| | — |
| | 2,442 |
|
| Other expense (income) | 6,221 |
| | (2,465 | ) | | (8,638 | ) |
| Income before income taxes | 28,627 |
| | 49,548 |
| | 39,639 |
|
| Income tax (benefit) expense | (3,040 | ) | | 9,030 |
| | (83,746 | ) |
| Net income | $ | 31,667 |
| | $ | 40,518 |
| | $ | 123,385 |
|
| Net income per common share: | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 0.81 |
| | $ | 1.06 |
| | $ | 3.31 |
|
| Diluted | $ | 0.79 |
| | $ | 1.03 |
| | $ | 3.17 |
|
| Weighted-average common shares outstanding: | | | | | |
| Basic | 38,988 |
| | 38,233 |
| | 37,276 |
|
| Diluted | 40,113 |
| | 39,501 |
| | 38,892 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended
December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Net income (loss) | $ | 28,067 | | | $ | (71,279) | | | $ | (13,473) | |
| Other comprehensive income: | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Foreign currency translation | (505) | | | (124) | | | 330 | |
| Realized loss on cash flow hedges, net of tax | (269) | | | — | | | — | |
| Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges, net of tax | — | | | 1,687 | | | (1,418) | |
| Total other comprehensive (loss) income | (774) | | | 1,563 | | | (1,088) | |
| Comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 27,293 | | | $ | (69,716) | | | $ | (14,561) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Net income | $ | 31,667 |
| | $ | 40,518 |
| | $ | 123,385 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | |
| Foreign currency translation | 148 |
| | (74 | ) | | (87 | ) |
| Total other comprehensive income (loss) | 148 |
| | (74 | ) | | (87 | ) |
| Comprehensive income | $ | 31,815 |
| | $ | 40,444 |
| | $ | 123,298 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
(in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Common Stock | | Treasury Stock | | | | Additional
Paid-In
Capital | | Accumulated
Deficit | | Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss | | Total
Stockholders’
Equity |
| | Shares | | Amount | | Shares | | Amount | | | | | |
| Balance, January 1, 2020 | | 39,251 | | | $ | 393 | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | | | | $ | 251,641 | | | $ | (136,473) | | | $ | (960) | | | $ | 114,601 | |
| Net loss | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | (13,473) | | | — | | | (13,473) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other comprehensive loss | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | (1,088) | | | (1,088) | |
| Stock option exercises and employee stock plan purchases | | 73 | | | 1 | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | 759 | | | — | | | — | | | 760 | |
| Vesting of restricted stock awards | | 847 | | | 8 | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | (8) | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Shares withheld to cover taxes | | (141) | | | (2) | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | (2,127) | | | — | | | — | | | (2,129) | |
| Issuance of common stock, net of $3,776 issuance costs | | 26,845 | | | 269 | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | 394,065 | | | — | | | — | | | 394,334 | |
| Fair value of replacement stock options related to precombination services | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | 7,125 | | | — | | | — | | | 7,125 | |
| Stock-based compensation | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | 14,075 | | | — | | | — | | | 14,075 | |
| Balance, December 31, 2020 | | 66,875 | | | 669 | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | 665,530 | | | (149,946) | | | (2,048) | | | 514,205 | |
| Net loss | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | (71,279) | | | — | | | (71,279) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other comprehensive income | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | 1,563 | | | 1,563 | |
| Stock option exercises and employee stock plan purchases | | 360 | | | 3 | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | 6,059 | | | — | | | — | | | 6,062 | |
| Vesting of restricted stock awards | | 611 | | | 6 | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | (6) | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Shares withheld to cover taxes | | (107) | | | (1) | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | (2,045) | | | — | | | — | | | (2,046) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Stock-based compensation | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | 15,934 | | | — | | | — | | | 15,934 | |
| Balance, December 31, 2021 | | 67,739 | | | 677 | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | 685,472 | | | (221,225) | | | (485) | | | 464,439 | |
| Net income | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | 28,067 | | | — | | | 28,067 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other comprehensive loss | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | (774) | | | (774) | |
| Stock option exercises and employee stock plan purchases | | 411 | | | 4 | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | 8,908 | | | — | | | — | | | 8,912 | |
| Vesting of restricted stock awards and units | | 845 | | | 9 | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | (9) | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Shares withheld to cover taxes | | (144) | | | (1) | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | (7,758) | | | — | | | — | | | (7,759) | |
| Repurchase of common stock | | — | | | — | | | 1,339 | | | (75,000) | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (75,000) | |
| Stock-based compensation | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | 29,262 | | | — | | | — | | | 29,262 | |
| Balance, December 31, 2022 | | 68,851 | | | $ | 689 | | | 1,339 | | | $ | (75,000) | | | | | | | $ | 715,875 | | | $ | (193,158) | | | $ | (1,259) | | | $ | 447,147 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Common Stock | | Additional Paid-In Capital | | Accumulated Deficit | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) |
| | | Shares | | Amount | |
| Balance, January 1, 2017 | | 36,756 |
| | $ | 367 |
| | $ | 226,462 |
| | $ | (332,398 | ) | | $ | (947 | ) | | $ | (106,516 | ) |
| Net income | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 123,385 |
| | — |
| | 123,385 |
|
| Other comprehensive loss | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (87 | ) | | (87 | ) |
| Stock option exercises and employee stock plan purchases | | 478 |
| | 5 |
| | 3,429 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,434 |
|
| Vesting of restricted stock awards | | 744 |
| | 8 |
| | (8 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Shares withheld to cover taxes | | (214 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (2,851 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (2,853 | ) |
| Stock-based compensation | | — |
| | — |
| | 5,928 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,928 |
|
| Balance, December 31, 2017 | | 37,765 |
| | 378 |
| | 232,960 |
| | (209,013 | ) | | (1,034 | ) | | 23,291 |
|
| Net income | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 40,518 |
| | — |
| | 40,518 |
|
| Forfeiture of dividend equivalent right | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 355 |
| | — |
| | 355 |
|
| Other comprehensive loss | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (74 | ) | | (74 | ) |
| Stock option exercises and employee stock plan purchases | | 223 |
| | 2 |
| | 1,578 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,580 |
|
| Vesting of restricted stock awards | | 672 |
| | 7 |
| | (7 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Shares withheld to cover taxes | | (194 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (3,384 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (3,386 | ) |
| Stock-based compensation | | — |
| | — |
| | 8,718 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8,718 |
|
| Balance, December 31, 2018 | | 38,466 |
| | 385 |
| | 239,865 |
| | (168,140 | ) | | (1,108 | ) | | 71,002 |
|
| Net income | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 31,667 |
| | — |
| | 31,667 |
|
| Other comprehensive income | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 148 |
| | 148 |
|
| Stock option exercises and employee stock plan purchases | | 95 |
| | 1 |
| | 1,745 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,746 |
|
| Vesting of restricted stock awards and units | | 796 |
| | 8 |
| | (8 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Shares withheld to cover taxes | | (106 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (2,453 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (2,454 | ) |
| Stock-based compensation | | — |
| | — |
| | 12,492 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 12,492 |
|
| Balance, December 31, 2019 | | 39,251 |
|
| $ | 393 |
|
| $ | 251,641 |
|
| $ | (136,473 | ) |
| $ | (960 | ) |
| $ | 114,601 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Operating activities | | | | | |
| Net income (loss) | $ | 28,067 | | | $ | (71,279) | | | $ | (13,473) | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
| Depreciation, amortization and accretion | 47,929 | | | 42,288 | | | 24,689 | |
| Impairment of long-lived assets | — | | | 9,729 | | | 9,935 | |
| Asset retirement obligation acceleration | 280 | | | 5,259 | | | — | |
| Gain on interest rate swap termination | (5,494) | | | — | | | — | |
| Amortization of debt related costs | 1,249 | | | 676 | | | 119 | |
| Changes in fair value of contingent assets and liabilities | 34,700 | | | 72,400 | | | (2,000) | |
| Charges incurred in connection with acquired IPR&D | 260,000 | | | — | | | — | |
| Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt | 588 | | | (889) | | | — | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Provision for excess and obsolete inventory | 7,145 | | | 4,057 | | | 2,365 | |
| Stock-based compensation | 29,262 | | | 15,934 | | | 14,075 | |
| (Gain) loss on disposal of assets | — | | | (15,263) | | | 2,250 | |
| | | | | |
| Deferred taxes | (48,016) | | | 4,437 | | | (1,334) | |
| Long-term indemnification receivable | 9,554 | | | 7,121 | | | (2,218) | |
| Long-term income tax payable and other long-term liabilities | (12,477) | | | (7,912) | | | 2,828 | |
| Other | 4,059 | | | 2,512 | | | 1,525 | |
| Increases (decreases) in cash from operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
| Accounts receivable | (128,460) | | | (33,102) | | | (7,462) | |
| Inventory | (7,508) | | | (3,549) | | | (8,459) | |
| Other current assets | (2,440) | | | (73) | | | 1,941 | |
| Other long-term assets | (533) | | | — | | | — | |
| Accounts payable | 301 | | | 5,425 | | | (4,224) | |
| | | | | |
| Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 63,575 | | | 16,145 | | | (4,161) | |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 281,781 | | | 53,916 | | | 16,396 | |
| Investing activities | | | | | |
| Capital expenditures | (18,347) | | | (12,140) | | | (12,474) | |
| Proceeds from sale of assets, net | 1,800 | | | 15,823 | | | — | |
| | | | | |
| Acquisition of assets | (260,000) | | | — | | | — | |
| Lending on bridge loan | — | | | — | | | (10,000) | |
| Cash acquired in acquisition of business | — | | | — | | | 17,562 | |
| | | | | |
| Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | (276,547) | | | 3,683 | | | (4,912) | |
| Financing activities | | | | | |
| Proceeds from issuance of common stock | 1,375 | | | 767 | | | 683 | |
| Equity issuance costs | — | | | — | | | (3,777) | |
| Debt issuance costs | (95) | | | — | | | — | |
| Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, net | 557,750 | | | — | | | — | |
| Payments on long-term debt and other borrowings | (175,385) | | | (43,348) | | | (15,491) | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Deferred financing costs | (2,315) | | | — | | | (1,224) | |
| Proceeds from interest rate swap termination | 5,583 | | | — | | | — | |
| Proceeds from stock option exercises | 7,537 | | | 5,295 | | | 77 | |
| Payments for minimum statutory tax withholding related to net share settlement of equity awards | (7,759) | | | (2,046) | | | (2,129) | |
| Repurchase of common stock | (75,000) | | | — | | | — | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 311,691 | | | (39,332) | | | (21,861) | |
| Effect of foreign exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents | (335) | | | (310) | | | 152 | |
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash | 316,590 | | | 17,957 | | | (10,225) | |
| Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of year | 100,651 | | | 82,694 | | | 92,919 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of year | $ | 417,241 | | | $ | 100,651 | | | $ | 82,694 | |
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)
(in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Reconciliation to amounts within the consolidated balance sheets | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 415,652 | | | $ | 98,508 | | | $ | 79,612 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents included in assets held for sale | — | | | — | | | 941 | |
| Restricted cash included in other long-term assets | 1,589 | | | 2,143 | | | 2,141 | |
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period | $ | 417,241 | | | $ | 100,651 | | | $ | 82,694 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Operating activities | | | | | |
| Net income | $ | 31,667 |
| | $ | 40,518 |
| | $ | 123,385 |
|
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
| Depreciation, amortization and accretion | 13,379 |
| | 13,929 |
| | 19,231 |
|
| Amortization of debt related costs | 978 |
| | 1,279 |
| | 1,361 |
|
| Provision for bad debt | 146 |
| | 321 |
| | 136 |
|
| Provision for excess and obsolete inventory | 1,851 |
| | 2,875 |
| | 1,215 |
|
| Stock-based compensation | 12,492 |
| | 8,718 |
| | 5,928 |
|
| Loss on impairment of land | — |
| | — |
| | 912 |
|
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | 3,196 |
| | — |
| | 2,442 |
|
| Deferred taxes | 9,725 |
| | 5,762 |
| | (86,946 | ) |
| Long-term income tax receivable | 10,635 |
| | (2,855 | ) | | (8,413 | ) |
| Long-term income tax payable and other long-term liabilities | (13,156 | ) | | 3,219 |
| | 2,793 |
|
| Other | 422 |
| | 1,399 |
| | 1,049 |
|
| Increases (decreases) in cash from operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
| Accounts receivable | 156 |
| | (3,985 | ) | | (3,407 | ) |
| Inventory | 1,994 |
| | (8,690 | ) | | (9,620 | ) |
| Other current assets | (2,411 | ) | | (661 | ) | | (388 | ) |
| Accounts payable | 3,233 |
| | (2,886 | ) | | 604 |
|
| Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 6,077 |
| | 2,250 |
| | 4,495 |
|
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 80,384 |
| | 61,193 |
| | 54,777 |
|
| Investing activities | | | | | |
| Capital expenditures | (22,061 | ) | | (20,132 | ) | | (17,543 | ) |
| Proceeds from sale of assets | — |
| | 1,000 |
| | 1,234 |
|
| Net cash used in investing activities | (22,061 | ) | | (19,132 | ) | | (16,309 | ) |
| Financing activities | | | | | |
| Proceeds from issuance of common stock | 573 |
| | 428 |
| | 187 |
|
| Payments for public offering costs | — |
| | — |
| | (74 | ) |
| Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt | 199,461 |
| | — |
| | 274,313 |
|
| Payments on long-term debt and other borrowings | (275,376 | ) | | (2,862 | ) | | (286,694 | ) |
| Deferred financing costs | (2,258 | ) | | — |
| | (1,576 | ) |
| Proceeds from stock option exercises | 1,173 |
| | 1,152 |
| | 3,247 |
|
| Payments for minimum statutory tax withholding related to net share settlement of equity awards | (2,454 | ) | | (3,386 | ) | | (2,853 | ) |
| Net cash used in financing activities | (78,881 | ) | | (4,668 | ) | | (13,450 | ) |
| Effect of foreign exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents | 76 |
| | (282 | ) | | 94 |
|
| Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (20,482 | ) | | 37,111 |
| | 25,112 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | 113,401 |
| | 76,290 |
| | 51,178 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of year | $ | 92,919 |
| | $ | 113,401 |
| | $ | 76,290 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information | | | | | |
| Cash paid during the period for: | | | | | |
| Interest | $ | 5,064 | | | $ | 6,284 | | | $ | 9,368 | |
| Income taxes, net of refunds of $50, $315 and $331, respectively | $ | 54,049 | | | $ | 215 | | | $ | 340 | |
| Schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities | | | | | |
| Additions of property, plant and equipment included in liabilities | $ | 2,370 | | | $ | 1,262 | | | $ | 2,227 | |
| Consideration transferred in acquisition | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 419,009 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information | | | | | |
| Cash paid during the period for: | | | | | |
| Interest | $ | 12,253 |
| | $ | 15,869 |
| | $ | 16,653 |
|
| Income taxes, net of refunds of $2, $35 and $17, respectively | $ | 274 |
| | $ | 90 |
| | $ | 106 |
|
| Schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities | | | | | |
| Additions of property, plant and equipment included in liabilities | $ | 4,175 |
| | $ | 7,395 |
| | $ | 2,738 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Description of Business
Lantheus Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is the parent company of Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc. (“LMI”) and LMI is the parent company of Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., also a Delaware corporation.corporation (“Progenics”). See “Progenics Acquisition”.
The Company develops, manufactures and commercializes innovative diagnostic medical imaging agents and othertherapeutic products that assist clinicians in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascularcancer, heart disease and other diseases. The Company believes its diagnostic products result in improved diagnostic information that enables healthcare providers to better detect and characterize, or rule out, disease, potentially achieving improved patient outcomes, reducing patient risk and limiting overall costs throughout the healthcare system.
The Company’s commercial products are used by oncologists, urologists, nuclear medicine physicians, cardiologists, nuclear physicians,sonographers, technologists, radiologists, and internal medicine physicians technologists and sonographers working in a variety of clinical settings.
The Company produces and markets its products throughout the U.S., selling primarily to hospitals, independent diagnostic testing facilities, government facilities, integrated delivery networks, radiopharmacies, clinics, and group practices. The Company sells its products to radiopharmacies, integrated delivery networks, hospitals, clinics and group practices.
The Company sells its products globally and has operations inoutside the U.S., Puerto Rico and through a combination of direct distribution in Canada and third-partythird party distribution relationships in Europe, Canada, Australia, Asia-Pacific, Central America and LatinSouth America.
The Company’s product portfolio includes an ultrasound contrast agent, nuclear imaging products and a radiotherapeutic product. The Company’s principal products include the following:
DEFINITY is a microbubble contrast agent used in ultrasound exams of the heart, also known as echocardiography exams. DEFINITY contains perflutren-containing lipid microspheres and is indicated in the U.S. for use in patients with suboptimal echocardiograms to assist in imaging the left ventricular chamber and left endocardial border of the heart in ultrasound procedures.
TechneLite is a Tc-99m generator that provides the essential nuclear material used by radiopharmacies to radiolabel Cardiolite, Neurolite and other Tc-99m-based radiopharmaceuticals used in nuclear medicine procedures. TechneLite uses Mo-99 as its active ingredient.
Sales of the Company’s microbubble contrastprostate cancer diagnostic imaging agent, PYLARIFY (as defined below), are generated in the U.S. through a PYLARIFY direct sales team and a sales team at some of our positron emission tomography (“PET”) manufacturing facilities (“PMF”) partners. Sales of the Company’s ultrasound enhancing agent, DEFINITY, are madegenerated in the U.S. and Canada through a DEFINITY direct sales team. In the U.S., the Company’s other nuclear imaging products, including TechneLite, Xenon, NeuroliteNEUROLITE and Cardiolite,CARDIOLITE, are primarily distributed throughsold to commercial radiopharmacies, the majority of which are controlled by or associated with GE Healthcare, Cardinal, RLS, UPPI, PharmaLogic and Jubilant Radiopharma and PharmaLogic.Radiopharma. A small portion of the Company’s nuclear imaging product sales in the U.S. are madegenerated through the Company’s direct sales force to hospitals and clinics that maintain their own in-house radiopharmaceutical preparation capabilities. TheWe have licensed RELISTOR to Bausch, and the Company owns one radiopharmacycollects quarterly royalties based on those sales. AZEDRA sales are generated in Puerto Rico where they sell their own products as well as products of third parties to end-users.the U.S. through an AZEDRA direct sales team.
The Company also maintains its own direct sales force in Canada for certain of its products. In Europe, Australia, Asia-Pacific, Central America and LatinSouth America, the Company generally relies on third-partythird party distributors to market, sell and distribute its nuclear imaging and contrastultrasound enhancing agent products, either on a country-by-country basis or on a multi-country regional basis. The Company’s executive offices are located in Bedford, MA, with additional offices in North Billerica, MA, Somerset, NJ, Montreal, Canada and Lund, Sweden.
Progenics TransactionAcquisition
On October 1, 2019, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of MergerJune 19, 2020 (the “Initial Merger Agreement”“Closing Date”) to acquire Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: PGNX) (“Progenics”) in an all-stock transaction. Progenics is an oncology company developing innovative medicines and artificial intelligence to find, fight and follow cancer. Under the terms of the Initial Merger Agreement, the Company agreed to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of Progenics common stock at a fixed exchange ratio. Progenics stockholders would have received 0.2502 shares of the Company’s common stock for each share of Progenics common stock, representing an approximately 35% aggregate ownership stake in the combined company. The transaction contemplated by the Initial Merger Agreement was unanimously approved by the Boards of Directors of both companies and was subject, pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the Initial Merger Agreement, including, among other things, the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock of Progenics and a majority of votes cast by the holders of the common stock of the Company. The Initial Merger Agreement further provides that in the event of a termination of the Initial Merger Agreement under certain circumstances, one party may be required to pay the other party a termination fee equal to $18.3 million. In the event of a termination of the Merger Agreement as a result of Progenics stockholders failing to adopt the Initial Merger Agreement, Progenics may be required to reimburse reasonable and documented out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the Company in connection with the Merger Agreement not to exceed $5.3 million.
On February 20, 2020, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 20, 2020 (the “Amended“Merger Agreement”), by and among Holdings, Plato Merger Agreement”Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings (“Merger Sub”), and Progenics, Holdings completed the acquisition of Progenics by means of a merger of Merger Sub with and into Progenics, with Progenics that, amongsurviving such merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings (the “Progenics Acquisition”).
In accordance with the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Progenics Acquisition (the “Effective Time”), each share of Progenics common stock, par value $0.0013 per share, issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than shares of Progenics common stock owned by Holdings, Progenics or any of their wholly-owned subsidiaries) was automatically cancelled and converted into the right to receive (i) 0.31 (the “Exchange Ratio”) of a share of Holdings common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and (ii) one contingent value right (a “CVR”) tied to the financial performance of PyL (18F-DCFPyL), Progenics’ prostate-specific membrane antigen (“PSMA”) targeted imaging agent designed to visualize prostate cancer. This agent was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) on May 26, 2021 under the name PYLARIFY (piflufolastat F 18), and the commercial launch of this agent began in June 2021. Each CVR entitles its holder to receive a pro rata share of aggregate cash payments equal to 40% of U.S. net sales generated by PYLARIFY in 2022 and 2023 in excess of $100.0 million and $150.0 million, respectively. In no event will the Company’s aggregate payments in respect of the CVRs, together with any other things, increases the exchange ratio and provides for the issuance of CVRsnon-stock consideration treated as paid in connection with the transaction. See Note 20, “Subsequent Events” for further detailsProgenics Acquisition, exceed 19.9% of the total consideration the Company pays in the Progenics Acquisition. Based on the Amended Merger Agreement.
Company’s 2022 PYLARIFY net sales, the Company determined that the aggregate payment obligation under the CVRs was $99.7 million. The Company expects to make that payment during the first half of 2023. As a result of the acquisition, Holdings issued 26,844,877 shares of Holdings common stock and 86,630,633 CVRs to former Progenics stockholders and option holders.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The more significant estimates reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to, certain judgments regarding revenue recognition, goodwill, tangible and intangible asset valuation, inventory valuation, asset retirement obligations, contingent assets and liabilities, income tax liabilities and related indemnification receivable, deferred tax assets and liabilities and accrued expenses. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates or assumptions.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue when it transfers control of promised goods or services to its customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods and services. See Note 3, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” for further discussion on revenues.
Accounts Receivable, net
Accounts receivable consist of amounts billed and currently due from customers. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses. In determining the allowance, consideration includes the probability of recoverability based on past experience and general economic factors. Certain accounts receivable may be fully reserved when the Company becomes aware of any specific collection issues. The Company periodically reviews the aging of receivables, payment history and customer creditworthiness to determine if adjustments to the allowance for bad debt is necessary. Allowance for bad debt has been immaterial for all years presented.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes using an asset and liability approach. Income tax (benefit) expense represents income taxes paid or payable for the current year plus the change in deferred taxes during the year. Deferred taxes result from differences between the financial and tax bases of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the currently enacted tax rates that apply to taxable income in effect for the years in which those tax attributes are expected to be recovered or paid, and are adjusted for changes in tax rates and tax laws when such changes are enacted.
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets to the extent that the Company believes that these assets are more-likely-than-not to be realized. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more-likely-than-not that the future tax benefit will not be realized. The assessment of whether or not a valuation allowance is required involves weighing both positive and negative evidence, including both historical and prospective information, with greater weight given to evidence that is objectively verifiable. A history of recent losses is negative evidence that is difficult to overcome with positive evidence. In evaluating prospective information there are four sources of taxable income: reversals of taxable temporary differences, items that can be carried back to prior tax years (such as net operating losses), pre-tax income, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. Adjustments to the deferred tax valuation allowances are made in the period when those assessments are made.
The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions using a two-step recognition threshold and measurement analysis method to determine the financial statement impact of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Differences between tax positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in the financial statements are recorded as adjustments to other long-term assets and liabilities, or adjustments to deferred taxes, or both. The Company records the related interest and penalties to income tax (benefit) expense.
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share
The Company computes earnings per share using the two-class method. Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, plus the potential dilutive effect of other securities as if those securities were converted or exercised. The Company’s potentially dilutive shares, which could include shares issuable upon conversion of the 2.625% Convertible Senior Notes due 2027 (the “Notes”), are considered to be common stock equivalents and are only included in the calculation of diluted net income per share when their effect is dilutive. The Company has the option to settle the Notes through cash settlement or a combination of cash and share settlement provided that the principal is settled in cash and the conversion spread is settled in cash or shares as elected by the Company. The Company applies the if-converted method for diluted earnings in order to reflect the conversion spread. During periods in which the Company incurs net losses, both basic and diluted loss per common share is calculated by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding and potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the calculation because their effect would be antidilutive.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include savings deposits, certificates of deposit and money market funds that have original maturities of three months or less when purchased.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, represents primarily collateral for a letter of credit securing a lease obligation and a security deposit. The Company believes the carrying value of these assets approximates fair value.
Concentration of Risks and Limited Suppliers
Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of trade accounts receivable. The Company periodically reviews its accounts receivable for collectability and provides for an allowance for doubtful accounts to the extent that amounts are not expected to be collected. The Company sells primarily to large national distributors, which in turn, resell the Company’s products.hospitals, independent diagnostic testing facilities, government facilities, integrated delivery networks, radiopharmacies, clinics, and group practices.
As of December 31, 2019,2022 and 2021, no customer accounted for greater than 10% of accounts receivable, net. One customer accounted for approximately 11% of accounts receivable, net for the year ended December 31, 2018. No customer accounted for greater than 10% of revenues for the years ended December 31, 20192022, 2021 and December 31, 2018. Three customers accounted for approximately 12%, 10% and 10% of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020.
The Company relies on certain materials used in its development and manufacturing processes, some of which are procured from only one or a few sources. The failure of one of these suppliers to deliver on schedule could delay or interrupt the manufacturing or commercialization process and would adversely affect the Company’s operating results. In addition, a disruption in the commercial supply of, or a significant increase in the cost of one of the Company’s materials from these sources could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position and results of operations.
The Company currently relies on JHS as its significant manufacturer of DEFINITY and its sole source manufacturer of NEUROLITE, CARDIOLITE and evacuation vials for TechneLite. The Company has Mo-99 supply agreements with IRE of Belgium, running through December 31, 2022,2023, with auto-renewal provisions and renewable by the Company on a year-to-year basis thereafter,terminable upon notice of non-renewal, and with ANSTONTP and NTP,its subcontractor ANSTO, running through December 31, 2021. The Company also has a Xenon supply agreement with IRE which runs through June 30, 2022, and which is subject to further extension. The Company currently relies on IRE as the sole supplier of bulk-unprocessed Xenon which the Company processes and finishes for its customers. The Company currently relies on JHS as its sole source manufacturer of DEFINITY, Neurolite, Cardiolite and evacuation vials for TechneLite.2024.
The following table sets forth revenues for each of the Company’s products representing 10% or more of revenues:
| | | | | | | | Year Ended
December 31, |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | |
| PYLARIFY | | PYLARIFY | 56.4 | % | | 10.2 | % | | — | % |
| DEFINITY | 62.6% | | 53.3% | | 47.5% | DEFINITY | 26.2 | % | | 54.7 | % | | 62.8 | % |
| TechneLite | 24.9% | | 28.8% | | 31.6% | TechneLite | 9.5 | % | | 21.5 | % | | 25.4 | % |
Inventory
Inventory includes material, direct labor and related manufacturing overhead and is stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value on a first-in, first-out basis. The Company records inventory when the Company takes title to the product.
The Company assesses the recoverability of inventory to determine whether adjustments for excess and obsolete inventory are required. Inventory that is in excess of future requirements is written down to its estimated net realizable value based on product shelf life, forecasted demand and other factors.
Inventory costs associated with product that has not yet received regulatory approval are capitalized if the Company believes there is probable future commercial use of the product and future economic benefits of the asset. If future commercial use of the product is not probable, then inventory costs associated with such product are expensed as incurred. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018,2021, the Company had no capitalized$6.1 million of such product costs included in inventories associated with productrelated to DEFINITY that did not havehad been manufactured through the Company’s in-house manufacturing capabilities. The Company received regulatory approval respectively.
DEFINITY at its new in-house manufacturing facility during the first quarter of 2022 and had no inventory pending regulatory approval as of December 31, 2022.
Property, Plant and Equipment, net
Property, plant & equipment are stated at cost. Replacements of major units of property are capitalized, and replaced properties are retired. Replacements of minor components of property and repair and maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred. Certain costs to obtain or develop computer software are capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful life of the software. Depreciation and amortization isare computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets.assets and recorded throughout costs of goods sold and operating expenses in the associated functional expense category which utilizes the associated asset. The estimated useful lives of the major classes of depreciable assets are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Class | | Range of Estimated Useful Lives |
| Buildings | | 10 - 50 years |
| Land improvements | | 15 - 40 years |
| Machinery and equipment | | 3 - 15 years |
| Furniture and fixtures | | 15 years |
| Leasehold improvements | | Lesser of lease term or 15 years |
| Computer software | | 3 - 5 years |
Upon retirement or other disposal of property, plant & equipment, the cost and related amount of accumulated depreciation are removed from the asset and accumulated depreciation accounts, respectively. The difference, if any, between the net asset value and the proceeds is included in operating income.
Included within machinery, equipment and fixtures are spare parts. Spare parts include replacement parts relating to plant & equipment and are either recognized as an expense when consumed or reclassified and capitalized as part of the related asset and depreciated over the remaining useful life of the related asset.
Business Combinations
The Company accounts for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting. The Company recognizes the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations on the basis of their fair values at the date of acquisition. The Company assesses the fair value of assets acquired, including intangible assets, and liabilities assumed using a variety of methods. Each asset acquired and liability assumed is measured at fair value from the perspective of a market participant. The method used to estimate the fair values of intangible assets incorporates significant assumptions regarding the estimates a market participant would make in order to evaluate an asset, including a market participant’s use of the asset and the appropriate discount rates. Acquired in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) is recognized at fair value and initially characterized as an indefinite-lived intangible asset, irrespective of whether the acquired IPR&D has an alternative future use. Any excess purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired is allocated to goodwill. Transaction costs and restructuring costs associated with a business combination are expensed as incurred.
During the measurement period, which extends no later than one year from the acquisition date, the Company may record certain adjustments to the carrying value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill. After the measurement period, all adjustments are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations as operating expenses or income. The Company recorded a measurement period adjustment of $2.6 million related to deferred taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2021, which finalized all measurement period adjustments related to the Progenics Acquisition.
Goodwill
Goodwill is not amortized but is instead tested for impairment at least annually and whenever events or circumstances indicate that it is more likely-than-not that they may be impaired. The Company has elected to perform the annual test for goodwill impairment as of October 31 of each year. All goodwill has been allocated to the U.S. reporting unit.
In performing the Company’s annual assessment, the Company is permitted to first perform a qualitative test and if necessary, perform a quantitative test. If the Company is required to perform the quantitative impairment test of goodwill, the Company compares the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value. If the reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, the Company would record an impairment loss to the extent that the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. The Company estimates the fair value of its reporting unitunits using discounted cash flow or other valuation models, such as comparative transactions and market multiples. The Company did not recognize any goodwill impairment charges during the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 or 2017.2020.
Intangible and Long-Lived Assets
The Company tests intangible and long-lived assets for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying value of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. The Company measures the recoverability of assets to be held and used by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If those assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment equals the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Any impairments are recorded as permanent reductions in the carrying amount of the assets. See Note 7, “Property, Plant and Equipment, Net” for further details on impairment. Long-lived assets, other than goodwill and other intangible assets that are held for sale are recorded at the lower of the carrying value or the fair market value less the estimated cost to sell.
Intangible assets, consisting of patents, trademarks, and customer relationships, a currently marketed product, licenses and developed technology related to the Company’s products are amortized in a method equivalent to the estimated utilization of the economic benefit of the asset.
Costs of IPR&D intangible assets acquired as part of an asset acquisition that have no alternative future use are expensed when incurred. Milestone payments made after regulatory approval are capitalized as an intangible asset and amortized over an estimated useful life of the product. Cash payments related to acquired IPR&D intangible assets are reflected as an investing cash flow in the Company's consolidated statement of cash flows.
The Company’s IPR&D intangible assets includes intangible assets acquired in a business combination that are used in research and development activities but have not yet reached technological feasibility, regardless of whether they have alternative future use. The primary basis for determining the technological feasibility or completion of these projects is obtaining regulatory approval to market the underlying products in an applicable geographic region. Because obtaining regulatory approval can include significant risks and uncertainties, the eventual realized value of the acquired IPR&D projects may vary from their fair value at the date of acquisition. The Company classifies IPR&D intangible assets acquired in a business combination as an indefinite-lived intangible asset until the completion or abandonment of the associated research and development efforts. Upon completion of the associated research and development efforts, the Company will determine the useful life and begin amortizing the assets to reflect their use over their remaining lives. Upon permanent abandonment, the Company writes-off the remaining carrying amount of the associated IPR&D intangible asset. IPR&D intangible assets are tested at least annually as of October 31 or when a triggering event occurs that could indicate a potential impairment and any impairment loss is recognized in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. See Note 11, “Intangibles, net and Goodwill” for further details on impairment.
Contingencies
In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to loss contingencies, such as legal proceedings and claims arising out of its business, that cover a wide range of matters, including, among others, product and environmental liability. The Company records accruals for those loss contingencies when it is probable that a liability will be incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company does not recognize gain contingencies until realized.
Convertible Notes
Effective as of January 1, 2021, the Company early adopted the provisions of ASU 2020-06, Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40):Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity. Upon adoption, the Company determined there was no impact for the year ended December 31, 2021. The provisions of ASU 2020-06 became applicable for the year ended December 31, 2022 in connection with the issuance of the Notes. This ASU provides guidance to simplify the complexity associated with accounting for convertible instruments and derivatives. For convertible instruments, the number of major separation models required were reduced. Consequently, more convertible debt instruments will be reported as a single liability instrument with no separate accounting for
embedded conversion features. The Company evaluates convertible notes to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for. The change in fair value of any separately recognized derivative is recorded in the consolidated statement of operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion, exercise or cancellation of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the date of conversion, exercise or cancellation.
Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments, including its cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate the carrying values of these instruments due to their short term nature. The Company’s long-term debt has triggering events that would impact the fair value of the instruments. The Company determined that no triggering event has occurred during the year ended December 31, 2022. Since no triggering events have occurred, the estimated fair value of the Company’s long term debt approximates its carrying values. The fair value See Note 4, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments”.
Contingent Consideration Liabilities
The estimated fair value of contingent consideration liabilities, initially measured and recorded on the acquisition date, are considered to be a Level 3 instrument and are reviewed quarterly, or whenever events or circumstances occur that indicate a change in fair value. The contingent consideration liabilities are recorded at fair value at the end of each reporting period with changes in estimated fair values recorded in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
The estimated fair value is determined based on probability adjusted discounted cash flows and Monte Carlo simulation models that include significant estimates and assumptions pertaining to commercialization events and sales targets. The most significant unobservable inputs are the probabilities of achieving regulatory approval of the development projects and subsequent commercial success.
Significant changes in any of the probabilities of success would result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. Significant changes in the probabilities as to the applicableperiods in which milestones will be achieved would result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement.
Derivative Instruments
The Company has used interest rates are subjectrate swaps to changereduce the variability in cash flows associated with marketa portion of the Company’s forecasted interest rates.payments on its variable rate debt. To qualify for hedge accounting, the hedging instrument must be highly effective at reducing the risk from the exposure being hedged. Further, the Company must formally document the hedging relationship at inception and, on at least a quarterly basis, continually reevaluate the relationship to ensure it remains highly effective throughout the life of the hedge. The Company does not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
Advertising and Promotion Costs
Advertising and promotion costs are expensed as incurred. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017,2020, the Company incurred $3.8$26.0 million,, $4.0 $17.5 million and $4.4$5.2 million, respectively in advertising and promotion costs, which are included in sales and marketing in the consolidated statements of operations.
Research and Development
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and relate primarily to the development of new products to add to the Company’s portfolio and costs related to its medical affairs and medical information functions. Nonrefundable advance payments for goods or services that will be used or rendered for future research and development activities are deferred and recognized as an expense as the goods are delivered or the related services are performed.
Foreign Currency
The consolidated statements of operations of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. Dollars using weighted-average exchange rates. The net assets of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. Dollars using the end of period exchange rates. The impact from translating the net assets of these subsidiaries at changing rates are recorded in the foreign currency translation adjustment account, which is included in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the consolidated balance sheets.
Remeasurement of the Company’s foreign currency denominated transactions are included in net income. Transaction gains and losses are reported as a component of other expenseother loss (income) in the consolidated statements of operations.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company’s stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date of the stock-based award based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period, which generally represents the vesting period, and includes an estimate of the awards that will be forfeited. The Company estimates the fair value of each stock-based award on its measurement date using either the current market price of the stock, the Black-Scholes option valuation model or the Monte Carlo Simulationsimulation valuation model, whichever is most appropriate. The Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo Simulationsimulation valuation models incorporate assumptions such as stock price volatility, the expected life of options or awards, a risk-free interest rate and dividend yield.
Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock price. The risk-free interest rates are based on quoted U.S. Treasury rates for securities with maturities approximating the awards’ expected lives. Expected lives are principally based on the Company’s historical exercise experience with previously issued awards. The expected dividend yield is zero as the Company has never paid dividends and does not currently anticipate paying any in the foreseeable future.
Expense for performance restricted stock awards is recognized based upon the fair value of the awards on the date of grant and the number of shares expected to vest based on the terms of the underlying award agreement and the requisite service period(s).
Other ExpenseLoss (Income)
Other expenseloss (income) consisted of the following:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Foreign currency (gains) losses | $ | (33 | ) | | $ | 557 |
| | $ | (253 | ) |
| Tax indemnification expense (income), net | 10,635 |
| | (2,855 | ) | | (8,367 | ) |
| Interest income | (686 | ) | | (167 | ) | | (18 | ) |
| Arbitration award | (3,453 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Other income | (242 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Total other expense (income) | $ | 6,221 |
| | $ | (2,465 | ) | | $ | (8,638 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
December 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Foreign currency losses (gains) | $ | 256 | | | $ | 274 | | | $ | 260 | |
| Tax indemnification expense (income), net | 9,554 | | | 7,121 | | | (2,218) | |
| Interest income | (2,613) | | | (45) | | | (238) | |
| Interest rate swap termination | (5,494) | | | — | | | — | |
| Other | — | | | — | | | (2) | |
| Total other loss (income) | $ | 1,703 | | | $ | 7,350 | | | $ | (2,198) | |
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) consists of net income (loss) and other gains and losses affecting stockholders’ equity that, under U.S. GAAP, are excluded from net income. For the Company, other comprehensive income (loss) consists of foreign currency translation gains and losses.losses as well as realized and unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges related to the Company’s interest rate swaps. The accumulated other comprehensive lossincome (loss) balance consists entirely of foreign currency translation gains and losses.
losses and realized and unrealized gains and losses on outstanding cash flow hedges related to the Company’s interest rate swaps.
Asset Retirement Obligations
The Company’s compliance with federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and regulations may require it to remove or mitigate the effects of the disposal or release of chemical substances in jurisdictions where it does business or maintains properties. The Company establishes accruals when those costs are legally obligated and can be reasonably estimated. Accrual amounts are estimated, which may include the assistance of third-partythird party environmental specialists, and are based on currently available information, regulatory requirements, remediation strategies, historical experience, the relative shares of the total remediation costs, a relevant discount rate, and the time periods of when estimated costs can be reasonably predicted. Changes in these assumptions could impact the Company’s future reported results.
The Company has production facilities which manufacture and process radioactive materials at its North Billerica, Massachusetts and San Juan, Puerto Rico sites.campus. The Company considers its legal obligation to remediate its facilities upon a decommissioning of its radioactive-related operations as an asset retirement obligation. The fair value of a liability for asset retirement obligations is recognized in the period in which the liability is incurred. The liability is measured at the present value of the obligation expected to be incurred and is adjusted in subsequent periods as accretion expense is recorded. The corresponding asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying values of the related long-lived assets and depreciated over the assets’ useful lives.
The Company has identified conditional asset retirement obligations related to the future removal and disposal of asbestos contained in certain of the buildings located on the Company’s North Billerica, Massachusetts campus. The Company believes the asbestos is appropriately contained and it is compliant with all applicable environmental regulations. If these properties undergo major renovations or are demolished, certain environmental regulations are in place, which specify the manner in which asbestos must be handled and disposed. The Company is required to record the fair value of these conditional liabilities if they can be reasonably estimated. As of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, sufficient information was not available to estimate a liability for such conditional asset retirement obligations as the obligations to remove the asbestos from these properties have indeterminable settlement dates. As such, no liability for conditional asset retirement obligations has been recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021.
Self-Insurance Reserves
The Company’s consolidated balance sheets at both December 31, 20192022 and 20182021 include $0.6$0.9 million and $0.7 million of accrued liabilities associated with employee medical costs that are retained by the Company.Company, respectively. The Company estimates the required liability of those claims on an undiscounted basis based upon various assumptions which include, but are not limited to, the Company’s historical loss experience and projected loss development factors. The required liability is also subject to adjustment in the future based upon changes in claims experience, including changes in the number of incidents (frequency) and change in the ultimate cost per incident (severity). The Company also maintains a separate cash account to fund these medical claims and must maintain a minimum balance as determined by the plan administrator. The balance of this restricted cash account was approximately $0.2 million and $0.1 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and is included in other current assets.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
|
| | | |
Standard | Description | Effective Date
for Company
| Effect on the
Consolidated Financial
Statements
|
Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted |
ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326)”
| This ASU will require financial instruments measured at amortized cost and accounts receivable to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The new model requires an entity to estimate credit losses based on historical information, current information and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. ASU 2016-13 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019.
| January 1, 2020 | The Company has completed its assessment on the impact of the standard and concluded that upon adoption of this
standard there will not be a material
impact to its consolidated financial statements.
|
The Company has not adopted any new accounting standards during the year ended December 31, 2022. |
| | | |
Standard | Description | | Effect on the
Consolidated Financial
Statements
|
Accounting Standards Adopted During the Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”
| This ASU supersedes existing guidance on accounting for leases in “Leases (Topic 840)” and generally requires all leases to be recognized on the balance sheet. In July 2018, an amendment was made that allows companies the option of using the effective date of the new standard as the initial application date (at the beginning of the period in which it is adopted, rather than at the beginning of the earliest comparative period).
| January 1, 2019 | See Note 13, "Leases" for the required disclosures related to the impact of adopting this standard.
The adoption of this standard resulted in the recording of an additional lease asset and lease liability of approximately $1.1 million as of January 1, 2019.
|
3. Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Adoption of ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASC 606”)
The Company adopted ASC 606 on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method for all contracts not completed as of the date of adoption. The reported results for 2019 and 2018 reflect the application of ASC 606 guidance while the reported results for 2017 were prepared under the guidance of ASC 605. The adoption of ASC 606 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, results of operations, equity or cash flows as of the adoption date or for the periods presented.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services. The amount of revenue recognized reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for these goods or services. To achieve this core principle, the Company applies the following five steps: (1) identify the contracts with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies a performance obligation.
Disaggregation of Revenue
The following table summarizes revenue by revenue source as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
Major Products/Service Lines
(in thousands) | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Product revenue, net(1) | | $ | 887,038 | | | $ | 400,356 | | | $ | 327,695 | |
License and royalty revenues(2) | | 48,023 | | | 24,852 | | | 11,715 | |
| Total revenues | | $ | 935,061 | | | $ | 425,208 | | | $ | 339,410 | |
(1)The Company’s principal products include PYLARIFY, DEFINITY, and reportable segmentTechneLite and are categorized within product revenue, net. The Company applies the same revenue recognition policies and judgments for all of its principal products.
(2)The Company recognized $24.0 million license revenue in the first quarter of 2022 related to an agreement with Novartis Pharma AG.
The Company classifies its revenues into three product categories: Precision Diagnostics, Radiopharmaceutical Oncology, and Strategic Partnerships and Other Revenue. Precision Diagnostics includes DEFINITY, TechneLite and other diagnostic imaging products. Radiopharmaceutical Oncology consists primarily of PYLARIFY and AZEDRA. Strategic Partnerships and Other Revenue includes strategic partnerships and other arrangements related to other products of the Company, such as royalty revenue from our license of RELISTOR.
On January 31, 2022, the Company entered into a global settlement agreement with Novartis Pharma AG (“Novartis”), Advanced Accelerator Applications USA, Inc. (“AAA”), Endocyte, Inc. (“Endocyte”) and their affiliates (the “Novartis Agreement”) to settle certain disputes between the parties. Under the Novartis Agreement, Novartis agreed to make a lump sum payment to the Company, as well as to reimburse the Company for certain fees and expenses in connection with certain German litigation, and the Company agreed to license certain intellectual property to Novartis. In addition, the Company agreed to supply PYLARIFY for clinical purposes at an arms-length value which will be recorded revenue in the future as product is provided. In accordance with the Company's ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, assessment, Novartis is considered to be a customer. The Company determined that the $24.0 million constituted a single element which was satisfied on the date of the execution of the Novartis Agreement. The Company determined that the license of intellectual property carried a fair value of $24.0 million. As such, the Company assigned the value to the fair value of the license, which constitutes the entire transaction price and does not require further allocation. The Company determined that the $24.0 million represented the point at which the licensee was able to use and benefit from the license and recognized revenue when the license was granted to Novartis upon execution of the Novartis Agreement. The Company recognized the $24.0 million fee as revenue on its consolidated statement of operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2022. The Company received the $24.0 million payment in April 2022.
Revenue by product category on a net basis is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| Major Products/Service Lines by Segment (in thousands) | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| U.S. | | | | |
Product revenue, net(1) | | $ | 303,989 |
| | $ | 288,580 |
|
| Total U.S. revenues | | 303,989 |
| | 288,580 |
|
| International | | | | |
Product revenue, net(1) | | 41,287 |
| | 52,556 |
|
| License and royalty revenues | | 2,061 |
| | 2,238 |
|
| Total International revenues | | 43,348 |
| | 54,794 |
|
| Total revenues | | $ | 347,337 |
| | $ | 343,374 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in thousands) | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| DEFINITY | | $ | 244,993 | | | $ | 232,759 | | | $ | 195,865 | |
| TechneLite | | 88,864 | | | 91,293 | | | 84,945 | |
| Other precision diagnostics | | 22,825 | | | 26,973 | | | 36,824 | |
| Total precision diagnostics | | 356,682 | | | 351,025 | | | 317,634 | |
| PYLARIFY | | 527,405 | | | 43,414 | | | — | |
| Other radiopharmaceutical oncology | | 4,102 | | | 5,473 | | | 10,022 | |
| Total radiopharmaceutical oncology | | 531,507 | | | 48,887 | | | 10,022 | |
| Strategic Partnerships and other revenue | | 46,872 | | | 25,296 | | | 11,754 | |
| Total revenues | | $ | 935,061 | | | $ | 425,208 | | | $ | 339,410 | |
______________________________
| |
(1) | The Company’s principal products include DEFINITY and TechneLite and are categorized within product revenue, net. The Company applies the same revenue recognition policies and judgments for all of its principal products. |
Product Revenue, Net
The Company sells its products principally to hospitals, independent diagnostic testing facilities, government facilities, integrated delivery networks, radiopharmacies, clinics, and clinics, radiopharmacies and distributors.group practices. The Company considers customer purchase orders, which in some cases are governed by master sales or group purchasing organization agreements, to be the contracts with a customer.
For each contract, the Company considers the promise to transfer products, each of which is distinct, to be the identified performance obligations. In determining the transaction price, the Company evaluates whether the price is subject to refund or adjustment to determine the net consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled.
The Company typically invoices customers upon satisfaction of identified performance obligations. As the Company’s standard payment terms are 30 to 60 days from invoicing, the Company has elected to use the significant financing component practical expedient.
The Company allocates the transaction price to each distinct product based on their relative standalone selling price. The product price as specified on the purchase order is considered the standalone selling price as it is an observable input which depicts the price as if sold to a similar customer in similar circumstances.
Revenue is recognized when control of the product is transferred to the customer (i.e., when the Company’s performance obligation is satisfied), which typically occurs upon delivery to the customer. Further, in determining whether control has transferred, the Company considers if there is a present right to payment and legal title, along with risks and rewards of ownership having transferred to the customer.
Frequently, the Company receives orders for products to be delivered over multiple dates that may extend across several reporting periods. The Company invoices for each delivery upon shipment and recognizes revenues for each distinct product delivered, assuming transfer of control has occurred.
The Company generally does not separately charge customers for shipping and handling costs, but any shipping and handling costs charged to customers are included in product revenue, net. Taxes collected from customers relating to product sales and remitted to governmental authorities are excluded from revenues.
Variable Consideration
Revenues from product sales are recorded at the net sales price (transaction price), which includes estimates of variable consideration for which reserves are established for discounts, returns, rebates and allowances that are offered within contracts between the Company and its customers. These reserves are based on the amounts earned or to be claimed on the related sales and are classified as a current liability. Where appropriate, these estimates take into consideration a range of possible outcomes which are probability-weighted for relevant factors such as the Company’s historical experience, current contractual and statutory requirements, specific known market events and trends, industry data and forecasted customer buying and payment patterns. Overall, these reserves reflect the Company’s best estimates of the amount of consideration to which it is entitled based on the
terms of the contract. The amount of variable consideration which is included in the transaction price may be constrained, and is included in the net sales price only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of the cumulative revenue recognized will not occur in a future period. Actual amounts of consideration ultimately received may differ from the
Company’s estimates. If actual results in the future vary from the Company’s estimates, the Company adjusts these estimates, which would affect product revenue and earnings in the period such variances become known.
Rebates and Allowances: The Company provides certain customers with rebates and allowances that are explicitly stated in the Company’s contracts and are recorded as a reduction of revenue in the period the related product revenue is recognized. The Company establishes a liability for such amounts, which is included in accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. These rebates and allowances result from performance-based offers that are primarily based on attaining contractually specified sales volumes and administrative fees the Company is required to pay to group purchasing organizations. The Company estimates the amount of rebates and allowances that are explicitly stated in the Company’s contracts based on a combination of actual purchases and an estimate of the customer’s buying patterns.
Product Returns: The Company generally offers customers a limited right of return due to non-conforming product. The Company estimates the amount of its product sales that may be returned by its customers and records this estimate as a reduction of revenue in the period the related product revenue is recognized. The Company currently estimates product return liabilities using its historical product return information and considers other factors that it believes could significantly impact its expected returns, including product recalls. Reserves for product returns are not significant to the Company due to the nature of its products including radiopharmaceutical products with limited half-lives.
An analysis of the amount of, and change in, reserves is summarized as follows:
| | | | | |
| (in thousands) | Rebates and
Allowances |
| Balance, January 1, 2021 | $ | 9,350 | |
| Provision related to current period revenues | 25,772 | |
| Adjustments relating to prior period revenues | 14 | |
| Payments or credits made during the period | (24,159) | |
| Balance, December 31, 2021 | 10,977 | |
| Provision related to current period revenues | 26,683 | |
| Adjustments relating to prior period revenues | 70 | |
| Payments or credits made during the period | (24,331) | |
| Balance, December 31, 2022 | $ | 13,399 | |
License and Royalty Revenues
The Company has entered into licensing agreements, under which it licenses certain rights to third parties. The terms of these arrangements typically include payment to the Company of one or more of the following: non-refundable, up-front license fees; development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments; and royalties on net sales of licensed products. The Company also has distribution licenses which are treated as combined performance obligations with the delivery of its products and are classified as product revenue, net.
In determining the appropriate amount of revenue to be recognized as it fulfills its obligations under each of its agreements, the Company performs the five-step approach stated earlier. The Company uses judgment in determining the number of performance obligations in a license agreement by assessing whether the license is distinct or should be combined with another performance obligation, as well as the nature of the license. As part of the accounting for these arrangements, the Company must develop assumptions that require judgment to determine the stand-alone selling price for each performance obligation identified in the contract. The Company uses key assumptions to determine the stand-alone selling price, which may include market conditions, reimbursement rates for personnel costs, development timelines and probabilities of regulatory success.
Licenses of intellectual property: If the license to the Company’s intellectual property is determined to be distinct from the other performance obligations identified in the arrangement, the Company recognizes revenues from non-refundable, up-front fees allocated to the license when the license is transferred to the customer and the customer is able to use and benefit from the license. For licenses that are bundled with other promises, the Company utilizes judgment to assess the nature of the combined performance obligation to determine whether the combined performance obligation is satisfied over time or at a point in time and, if over time, the appropriate method of measuring progress for purposes of recognizing revenue from non-refundable, up-front fees. The Company evaluates the measure of progress each reporting period and, if necessary, adjusts the measure of performance and related revenue recognition.
Milestone Payments: At the inception of each arrangement that includes development or sales milestone payments, the Company evaluates whether the milestones are considered probable of being reached and estimates the amount to be included in the transaction price using the most likely amount method. If it is probable that a significant revenue reversal would not occur, the associated milestone value is included in the transaction price. Milestone payments that are not withinoutside the control of the Company or the licensee, such as regulatory approvals, are not considered probable of being achieved until those approvals are received. The transaction price is then allocated to each performance obligation on a relative stand-alone selling price basis, for which the Company recognizes revenue as or when the performance obligations under the contract are satisfied. At the end of each subsequent reporting period, the Company re-evaluates the probability of achievement of such development milestones and any related constraint, and if necessary, adjusts its estimate of the overall transaction price. Any such adjustments are recorded on a cumulative catch-up basis, which would affect license and royalty revenues and earnings in the period of adjustment. At December 31, 2019,2022, the Company is constraining variable consideration related to development milestone payments requiring regulatory approvals.approvals and sales milestone payments related to achievement of certain sales targets.
Royalty Revenues: For arrangements that include sales-based royalties, including milestone payments based on the level of sales, and the license is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties relate, the Company recognizes revenue at the later of (i) when the related sales occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied).
Contract Costs
The Company recognizes an asset for incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer if it expects to recover those costs. The Company’s sales incentive compensation plans qualify for capitalization since these plans are directly related to sales achieved during a period of time. However, the Company has elected the practical expedient to expense the costs as they are incurred, within sales and marketing expenses, since the amortization period is less than one year.
The Company recognized certain revenues as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Amounts included in the contract liability at the beginning of the period | $ | 244 | | | $ | 33 | |
| | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Amounts included in the contract liability at the beginning of the period | $ | 33 |
| | $ | 33 |
|
| Performance obligations satisfied (or partially satisfied) in previous periods | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
The Company’s performance obligations are typically part of contracts that have an original expected duration of one year or less. As such, the Company is not disclosing the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied (or partially satisfied) as of the end of the reporting period.
4. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In order to increase consistency and comparability of fair value measurements, financial instruments are categorized based on a hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels, which are described below:
•Level 1 — Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.
•Level 2 — Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, etc.) and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).
•Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that reflect a Company’s estimates about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The Company develops these inputs based on the best information available, including its own data.
The Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis consist of money market funds.funds, interest rate swaps, a contingent receivable and contingent consideration liabilities. The Company invests excess cash from its operating cash accounts in overnight investments and reflects these amounts in cash and cash equivalents in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.
the interest rate swaps is determined based on observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and reflects the contractual terms of these instruments, including the period to maturity. Please refer to Note 14, “Derivative Instruments”, for further details on the interest rate swaps. The Company recorded a contingent receivable and the contingent consideration liabilities resulting from the Progenics Acquisition at fair value based on inputs that are not observable in the market. Please refer to Note 8, “Business Combinations”, for further details on the acquisition.
The tables below present information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2022 |
| (in thousands) | Total Fair
Value | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
| Assets: | | | | | | | |
| Money market | $ | 342,646 | | | $ | 342,646 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Total assets | $ | 342,646 | | | $ | 342,646 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| Liabilities: | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Contingent consideration liabilities | $ | 111,600 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 111,600 | |
| Total liabilities | $ | 111,600 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 111,600 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2021 |
| (in thousands) | Total Fair
Value | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
| Assets: | | | | | | | |
| Money market | $ | 40,140 | | | $ | 40,140 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| Interest rate swaps | 357 | | | — | | | 357 | | | — | |
| Contingent receivable | 9,300 | | | — | | | — | | | 9,300 | |
| Total assets | $ | 49,797 | | | $ | 40,140 | | | $ | 357 | | | $ | 9,300 | |
| Liabilities: | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Contingent consideration liabilities | 86,200 | | | — | | | — | | | 86,200 | |
| Total liabilities | $ | 86,200 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 86,200 | |
| | | | | | | |
During the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3. On December 2, 2022, the Company voluntarily terminated the interest rate swap contracts in connection with the refinancing of debt.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2019 |
| (in thousands) | Total Fair
Value | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
| Money market | $ | 39,530 |
| | $ | 39,530 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Total | $ | 39,530 |
| | $ | 39,530 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
As part of the Progenics Acquisition, the Company issued CVRs and recorded the fair value as part of consideration transferred. Each CVR will entitle its holder to receive a pro rata share of aggregate cash payments equal to 40% of U.S. net sales generated by PYLARIFY in 2022 and 2023 in excess of $100.0 million and $150.0 million, respectively, subject to a maximum cap. Refer to Note 1, “Description of Business” for further details on the CVRs. The Company considers the contingent consideration liabilities relating to the CVRs a Level 3 instrument (one with significant unobservable inputs) in the fair value hierarchy. The estimated fair value of these had been determined based on Monte Carlo simulation models that included significant estimates and assumptions pertaining to commercialization events and sales targets. Based on the U.S. net sales generated by PYLARIFY in 2022, the Company currently expects to pay out the full amount of the CVRs from available cash in the first half of 2023.
The Company also assumed contingent consideration liabilities related to a previous acquisition completed by Progenics in 2013 (“2013 Acquisition”). These contingent consideration liabilities include potential payments of up to $70.0 million if the Company attains certain net sales targets primarily for AZEDRA and 1095 and a $5.0 million 1095 commercialization milestone. Additionally, there is a potential payment of up to $10.0 million related to a 1404 commercialization milestone. The Company’s total potential payments related to the 2013 Acquisition are approximately $85.0 million. The Company considers the contingent consideration liabilities relating to the 2013 Acquisition each a Level 3 instrument (one with significant unobservable inputs) in the fair value hierarchy. The estimated fair value of these was determined based on probability adjusted discounted cash flows and Monte Carlo simulation models that included significant estimates and assumptions pertaining to commercialization events and sales targets. The most significant unobservable inputs with respect to 1095 and 1404 are the probabilities of achieving regulatory approval of those development projects and subsequent commercial success.
Significant changes in any of the probabilities of success, the probabilities as to the periods in which sales targets and milestones will be achieved, discount rates or underlying revenue forecasts would result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. The Company records the contingent consideration liability at fair value with changes in estimated fair values recorded in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company can give no assurance that the actual amounts paid, if any, in connection with the contingent consideration liabilities, including the CVRs, will be consistent with any recurring fair value estimate of such contingent consideration liabilities.
The following tables summarize quantitative information and assumptions pertaining to the fair value measurement of assets and liabilities using Level 3 inputs as of December 31, 2022.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair Value as of | | | | | | Assumptions |
| (in thousands) | December 31, 2022 | | December 31, 2021 | | Valuation Technique | | Unobservable Input | | December 31, 2022 | | December 31, 2021 |
| Contingent receivable: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Regulatory milestone | $ | — | | | $ | 2,500 | | | Probability adjusted discounted cash flow model | | Period of expected milestone achievement | | N/A | | 2022 |
| | | | | | | Probability of success | | 0% | | 70 | % |
| | | | | | | Discount rate | | N/A | | 17 | % |
| Royalties | — | | | 6,800 | | | Probability adjusted discounted cash flow model | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Probability of success | | 0% | | 10% - 60% |
| | | | | | | Discount rate | | N/A | | 17 | % |
| Total | $ | — | | | $ | 9,300 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Fair Value as of | | Assumptions |
| (in thousands) | | (in thousands) | December 31, 2022 | | December 31, 2021 | | Valuation Technique | | Unobservable Input | | December 31, 2022 | | December 31, 2021 |
| Contingent consideration liability: | | Contingent consideration liability: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net sales targets - PYLARIFY (CVRs) | | Net sales targets - PYLARIFY (CVRs) | $ | 99,700 | | | $ | 73,200 | | | Probability adjusted discounted cash flow model (as of 12/31/2022)
Monte Carlo simulation
(as of 12/31/2021)
| | Period of expected milestone achievement and sales targets | | 2022 - 2023 | | 2022 - 2023 |
| | | Probability of success | | 100 | % | | N/A |
| | | Discount rate | | N/A | | 17 | % |
| 1095 commercialization milestone | | 1095 commercialization milestone | 1,700 | | | 1,900 | | | Probability adjusted discounted cash flow model | |
| | | Period of expected milestone achievement | | 2026 | | 2026 |
| | | | | | | | | | | Probability of success | | 40 | % | | 40 | % |
| | December 31, 2018 | | Discount rate | | 3.8 | % | | 1.3 | % |
| (in thousands) | Total Fair Value | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | |
| Money market | $ | 61,391 |
| | $ | 61,391 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| |
| | Net sales targets - AZEDRA and 1095 | | Net sales targets - AZEDRA and 1095 | 10,200 | | | 11,100 | | | Monte Carlo simulation | |
| | | Probability of success and sales targets | | 20% - 100% | | 40% - 100% |
| | | Discount rate | | 16% - 17% | | 16% - 17% |
| Total | $ | 61,391 |
| | $ | 61,391 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| Total | $ | 111,600 | | | $ | 86,200 | | |
For those financial instruments with significant Level 3 inputs, the following table summarizes the activities for the periods indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Financial Assets | | Financial Liabilities |
| (in thousands) | Years Ended December 31, | | Years Ended December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Fair value, beginning of period | $ | 9,300 | | | $ | 11,300 | | | $ | 86,200 | | | $ | 15,800 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Changes in fair value included in net income (loss) | (9,300) | | | (2,000) | | | 25,400 | | | 70,400 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Fair value, end of period | $ | — | | | $ | 9,300 | | | $ | 111,600 | | | $ | 86,200 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
The change in fair value of the contingent financial asset and contingent financial liabilities, including the CVRs, resulted in a general and administrative expense of $34.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 and was primarily due to changes in revenue forecasts, changes in market conditions, an increase in discount rates (excluding the CVRs) and the passage of time. The Company expects to make all applicable cash payments related to the CVRs in the first half of 2023. As of December 31, 2022, the Company had $99.7 million in current liabilities to account for the expected payments related to the CVRs.
5. Income Taxes
The components of income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes is summarized as follows:consists of the following:
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | (in thousands) | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| U.S. | $ | 25,432 |
| | $ | 46,945 |
| | $ | 39,559 |
| U.S. | $ | 29,012 | | | $ | (76,389) | | | $ | (5,495) | |
| International | 3,195 |
| | 2,603 |
| | 80 |
| International | (2,293) | | | 1,351 | | | (5,984) | |
| Income before income taxes | $ | 28,627 |
| | $ | 49,548 |
| | $ | 39,639 |
| |
| Income (loss) before income taxes | | Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 26,719 | | | $ | (75,038) | | | $ | (11,479) | |
The Company’s provision (benefit) for income tax (benefit) expense is summarized as follows:taxes consists of the following:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Current | | | | | |
| Federal | $ | 287 |
| | $ | (21 | ) | | $ | (58 | ) |
| State | (13,166 | ) | | 3,424 |
| | 3,242 |
|
| International | 114 |
| | (135 | ) | | 16 |
|
| | (12,765 | ) | | 3,268 |
| | 3,200 |
|
| Deferred | | | | | |
| Federal | 8,712 |
| | 7,821 |
| | (71,742 | ) |
| State | 790 |
| | 1,411 |
| | (15,220 | ) |
| International | 223 |
| | (3,470 | ) | | 16 |
|
| | 9,725 |
| | 5,762 |
| | (86,946 | ) |
| Income tax (benefit) expense | $ | (3,040 | ) | | $ | 9,030 |
| | $ | (83,746 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended
December 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Current | | | | | |
| Federal | $ | 42,532 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| State | 4,302 | | | (8,166) | | | 3,158 | |
| International | (166) | | | (30) | | | 170 | |
| 46,668 | | | (8,196) | | | 3,328 | |
| Deferred | | | | | |
| Federal | (39,920) | | | 1,048 | | | (1,506) | |
| State | (8,315) | | | 3,058 | | | (178) | |
| International | 219 | | | 331 | | | 350 | |
| (48,016) | | | 4,437 | | | (1,334) | |
| Income tax (benefit) expense | $ | (1,348) | | | $ | (3,759) | | | $ | 1,994 | |
The reconciliation of income taxes at the U.S. federal statutory rate to the actual income taxestax (benefit) expense is as follows:
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | Year Ended
December 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | (in thousands) | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| U.S. statutory rate | $ | 6,012 |
| | $ | 10,405 |
| | $ | 13,873 |
| U.S. statutory rate | $ | 5,611 | | | $ | (15,758) | | | $ | (2,411) | |
| Permanent items | 3,737 |
| | 505 |
| | (1,916 | ) | Permanent items | 2,309 | | | 1,764 | | | 1,176 | |
| Acquisition costs - Progenics | | Acquisition costs - Progenics | — | | | — | | | 2,723 | |
| Recognition of deferred tax asset - assets held for sale | | Recognition of deferred tax asset - assets held for sale | — | | | — | | | (3,000) | |
| Section 162(m) | | Section 162(m) | 247 | | | 1,028 | | | 717 | |
| Uncertain tax positions | (13,156 | ) | | 3,227 |
| | 3,128 |
| Uncertain tax positions | (12,629) | | | (8,952) | | | 2,818 | |
| Other tax credits | (1,685 | ) | | (742 | ) | | (175 | ) | Other tax credits | (4,085) | | | (990) | | | (1,065) | |
| State and local taxes | 1,914 |
| | 2,125 |
| | 1,252 |
| State and local taxes | 67 | | | 656 | | | 1,457 | |
| Impact of rate change on deferred taxes | — |
| | — |
| | 45,129 |
| |
| True-up of prior year tax | — |
| | — |
| | 7 |
| |
| Impact on deferred taxes of change in tax rate | | Impact on deferred taxes of change in tax rate | 4,169 | | | 3,049 | | | — | |
| Non-deductible changes in fair value of contingent assets and liabilities | | Non-deductible changes in fair value of contingent assets and liabilities | 5,422 | | | 15,015 | | | 230 | |
| Foreign tax rate differential | (238 | ) | | 30 |
| | 97 |
| Foreign tax rate differential | 68 | | | 23 | | | (254) | |
| Valuation allowance | (22 | ) | | (4,073 | ) | | (141,094 | ) | Valuation allowance | (30) | | | (400) | | | (318) | |
| Benefit of windfall related to stock compensation | (2,768 | ) | | (1,760 | ) | | (2,723 | ) | Benefit of windfall related to stock compensation | (4,612) | | | (1,164) | | | (128) | |
| Increase in indemnification deferred tax asset | 2,531 |
| | (731 | ) | | (1,055 | ) | |
| Change in indemnification deferred tax asset | | Change in indemnification deferred tax asset | 2,343 | | | 1,786 | | | (590) | |
| Other | 635 |
| | 44 |
| | (269 | ) | Other | (228) | | | 184 | | | 639 | |
| Income tax (benefit) expense | $ | (3,040 | ) | | $ | 9,030 |
| | $ | (83,746 | ) | Income tax (benefit) expense | $ | (1,348) | | | $ | (3,759) | | | $ | 1,994 | |
The components of deferred income tax assets (liabilities) are as follows:
| | | | December 31, | | December 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | (in thousands) | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Deferred Tax Assets | | | | Deferred Tax Assets | | | |
| Federal benefit of state tax liabilities | $ | 5,278 |
| | $ | 7,809 |
| Federal benefit of state tax liabilities | $ | 1,739 | | | $ | 4,292 | |
| Reserves, accruals and other | 15,026 |
| | 11,005 |
| Reserves, accruals and other | 31,532 | | | 27,159 | |
| Inventory obsolescence | 550 |
| | 428 |
| Inventory obsolescence | 919 | | | 297 | |
| Capitalized research and development | 5,086 |
| | 7,491 |
| Capitalized research and development | 79,946 | | | 768 | |
| Amortization of intangibles other than goodwill | 1,569 |
| | 2,809 |
| Amortization of intangibles other than goodwill | — | | | 502 | |
| Net operating loss carryforwards | 47,095 |
| | 55,938 |
| Net operating loss carryforwards | 88,014 | | | 122,944 | |
| Depreciation | 56 |
| | — |
| Depreciation | — | | | 1,102 | |
| Deferred tax assets | 74,660 |
| | 85,480 |
| Deferred tax assets | 202,150 | | | 157,064 | |
| Deferred Tax Liabilities | | | | Deferred Tax Liabilities | | | |
| Reserves, accruals and other | (881 | ) | | (1,078 | ) | Reserves, accruals and other | (5,354) | | | (3,026) | |
| Customer relationships | (707 | ) | | (986 | ) | |
| Intangible assets | | Intangible assets | (80,770) | | | (87,351) | |
| Amortization of intangibles other than goodwill | | Amortization of intangibles other than goodwill | (385) | | | — | |
| Depreciation | — |
| | (727 | ) | Depreciation | (1,469) | | | — | |
| Deferred tax liability | (1,588 | ) | | (2,791 | ) | Deferred tax liability | (87,978) | | | (90,377) | |
| Less: valuation allowance | (1,238 | ) | | (1,240 | ) | Less: valuation allowance | (3,525) | | | (3,923) | |
| | $ | 71,834 |
| | $ | 81,449 |
| | $ | 110,647 | | | $ | 62,764 | |
| Recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as: | | | | Recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as: | | | |
| Noncurrent deferred tax assets, net | $ | 71,834 |
| | $ | 81,449 |
| Noncurrent deferred tax assets, net | $ | 110,647 | | | $ | 62,764 | |
|
On December 22, 2017, the United States enacted theThe Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Act”). The Act is significant and has wide-ranging effects.
The Company has completed its study of the ramifications of was enacted on December 22, 2017. Under the Act, research and has confirmedexperimental expenditures incurred for tax years beginning after December 31, 2021, must be capitalized and amortized ratably over five or fifteen years for tax purposes, depending on where the primary materialresearch activities are conducted. If the requirement to capitalize Section 174 expenditures is not modified, it may also impact ofour effective tax rate and our cash tax liability in future years.The increase in worldwide net deferred tax asset is primarily due to the Act to be the remeasurementtax capitalization of the Company’s deferred tax assets, which was recordedcurrent year research and development expenses that are not currently deductible in fiscal 2017 as2022, offset by utilization of a resultportion of the reduction in U.S. corporate tax rates from 35% to 21%. As of December 31, 2017, the Company determined it had no accumulated unrepatriated foreign earnings, and therefore recorded no liability for the repatriation transition tax.
The Company has also completed its evaluation of and accounting for all other relevant changes resulting from the Act, and has determined that through December 31, 2018, these changes do not materially impact the Company's effective tax rate.
net operating losses.
The Company regularly assesses its ability to realize its deferred tax assets. Assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets requires significant management judgment. In determining whether its deferred tax assets are more-likely-than-not realizable, the Company evaluated all available positive and negative evidence,evidence. As of December 31, 2022 and weighed2021, the objective evidence and expected impact. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2018, the Company's Canada subsidiary entered an accumulated three year period of profitability, removing a strong item of negative evidence previously supporting the recording of a full valuation allowance. Management has determined that the weight of the relevant positive evidence outweigh the negative evidence, and released the valuation allowance against its Canada subsidiary's net deferred tax assets, resulting in an income tax benefit of $4.0 million in fiscal 2018. The Company continues to recordmaintains a valuation allowance of $1.2$3.5 million against theand $3.9 million, respectively, related to net deferred tax assets of certain of its U.K. subsidiary.foreign subsidiaries and U.S. acquired tax credits.
DuringUtilization of net operating loss carryforwards and research and development credit carryforwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to ownership change limitations that could occur in the fourth quarterfuture in accordance with Section 382 of 2017,the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (“IRC Section 382”) and with Section 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as well as similar state provisions. These ownership changes may limit the amount of net operating loss carryforwards and research and development credit carryforwards that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income and taxes, respectively. In general, an ownership change, as defined by IRC Section 382, results from transactions increasing the ownership of certain stockholders or public groups in the stock of a corporation by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year period.
At December 31, 2022, the Company determined based on its consideration of the weight of positive and negative evidence that there was sufficient positive evidence that itshad U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $338.4 million, $200.4 million of which will expire between 2024 and state deferred tax assets were more-likely-than-not realizable.2037, and $138.0 million of which can be carried forward indefinitely. The Company’s conclusion was primarily driven by the achievement ofstate net operating losses are $11.6 million on a sustained level of U.S. profitability, the expectation of sustained future profitability,tax-effected basis, which will expire between 2024 and mitigating factors related to external supplier and customer risk sufficient to outweigh the available negative evidence. Accordingly, the Company released the valuation allowance previously recorded against its U.S. net deferred tax assets, resulting in a fiscal 2017 income tax benefit of $141.1 million.
2040. The Company has state research credit carryforwards of $2.9 million, which will continue to assess the levelexpire between 2024 and 2037. The Company has state investment tax credit carryforwards of the valuation allowance required. If the weight$1.4 million net of negative evidence exists in future periods to again support the recording of a partial or full valuation allowance against the Company’s deferred tax assets, there would likely be a material negativefederal impact on the Company’s results of operations in that future period.
A summary of the changes in the Company’s valuation allowance is summarized below:
|
| | | |
| (in thousands) | Amount |
| Balance, January 1, 2018 | $ | 5,368 |
|
| Charged to income tax (benefit) expense | (103 | ) |
| Foreign currency | (56 | ) |
| Release valuation allowance | (3,969 | ) |
| Balance, December 31, 2018 | 1,240 |
|
| Charged to income tax (benefit) expense | (22 | ) |
| Foreign currency | 20 |
|
| Release valuation allowance | — |
|
| Balance, December 31, 2019 | $ | 1,238 |
|
The Company’s U.S. federal income tax returns are subject to examination for three years.years after the filing date of the return. The state and foreign income tax returns are subject to examination for periods varying from three to four years after filing, depending on the specific jurisdictions’ statutes of limitation.
At December 31, 2019,limitation, and in the Company has U.S. federal net operating loss carryoverscase of approximately $174.0 million, which will expire between 2032 and 2037, and U.S. federal research creditsSweden, up to six years after the end of $1.4 million which will begin to expire in 2037. The Company has state research credit carryforwards of $3.0 million, which will expire between 2024 and 2033. The Company has state investment tax credit carryforwards of $2.1 million, of which $0.7 million have no expiration date, and the remainder of which will begin to expire in 2020 and fully expire in 2022.
financial year.
A reconciliation of the Company’s changes in uncertain tax positions for 20192022 and 20182021 is as follows:
|
| | | |
| (in thousands) | Amount |
| Balance of uncertain tax positions as of January 1, 2018 | $ | 9,866 |
|
| Additions related to current year tax positions | — |
|
| Reductions related to prior year tax positions | (4 | ) |
| Settlements | — |
|
| Lapse of statute of limitations | (74 | ) |
| Balance of uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2018 | 9,788 |
|
| Additions related to current year tax positions | — |
|
| Reductions related to prior year tax positions | (4,496 | ) |
| Settlements | — |
|
| Lapse of statute of limitations | — |
|
| Balance of uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2019 | $ | 5,292 |
|
| | | | | |
| (in thousands) | Amount |
| Balance of uncertain tax positions as of January 1, 2021 | $ | 5,292 | |
| Additions related to current year tax positions | — | |
| Reductions related to prior year tax positions | (188) | |
| Settlements | (1,446) | |
| Lapse of statute of limitations | — | |
| Balance of uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2021 | 3,658 | |
| Additions related to current year tax positions | — | |
| Reductions related to prior year tax positions | (1,180) | |
| Settlements | (306) | |
| Lapse of statute of limitations | (692) | |
| Balance of uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2022 | $ | 1,480 | |
In connection with the Company’s acquisition of the medical imaging business from Bristol-Myers Squibb (“BMS”) in 2008, the Company recorded a liability for uncertain tax positions related to the acquired business and simultaneously entered into a tax indemnificationan agreement with BMS under which BMS agreed to indemnify the Companywith BMS for any payments made to settle those uncertain tax positions with the taxing authorities. Accordingly, aA long-term receivable is recorded within other long-term assets to account for the expected value to the Company of future indemnification payments, net of actual tax benefits received, to be paid on behalf of the Company by BMS. The tax indemnification receivable is recorded within other long-term assets.
In accordance with the Company’s accounting policy, the change in the tax liability, penalties and interest associated with these uncertain tax positionsobligations (net of any offsetting federal or state benefit) is recognized within income tax (benefit) expense. Contemporaneously, changes in the tax indemnification receivable are recognized within other expense (income) in the consolidated statement of operations. Accordingly, asAs these reserves change, adjustments are included in income tax (benefit) expense with anwhile the offsetting adjustment is included in other expense (income).income. Assuming that the receivable from BMS continues to be considered recoverable by the Company, there will be no effect on net income and no net cash outflows related to these liabilities.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company released $17.1 million of liabilities for uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties of $12.7 million. This included a release of a liability of $1.9 million, including interest and penalties of $1.4 million, arising from a settlement during the year. The remaining release of $15.2 million of liability was due to a change in estimate with respect to the Company’s indemnified uncertain tax positions. In late 2019 the Company reassessed its indemnified uncertain tax positions and obtained, with the assistance of third-party tax experts, additional technical insights with respect to the indemnified uncertain tax positions. On the basis of the new information obtained, the Company changed its estimate with respect to certain of its indemnified uncertain tax positions and consequently released $15.2 million of related reserves.
The combined release of $17.1 million was recorded to income tax (benefit) expense and offset by a reduction in deferred tax assets of $3.3 million and a $13.8 million reduction of the indemnification receivable recorded to other expense (income). The amount due from BMS as of December 31, 2019, was also increased by $3.2 million, due to the accrual of interest on the liability with respect to the remaining uncertain tax positions. Similarly, the amount due from BMS increased by $3.3 million in 2018, due to the accrual of interest on the existing liability for uncertain tax positions. In 2017, the amount due from BMS increased by $8.4 million, primarily due to the decrease in U.S. corporate tax rates effective January 1, 2018. As noted above, there is no effect on net income or net cash flows in any period due to the indemnification agreement in place.
As of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, total liabilities for uncertain tax positions including interest and penalties were $27.0$8.3 million and $40.2$20.9 million, respectively, consisting of uncertain tax positions of $5.3$1.5 million and $9.8$3.7 million, respectively, interest accruals of $20.7$6.4 million and $28.2$16.5 million, respectively, and penalty accruals of $1.0$0.4 million and $2.2$0.8 million, respectively. As of December 31, 20192022 and 2018, all of2021, these liabilities were included in other long-term liabilities. Included in the 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020 tax provisions are a benefit of $13.2$12.6 million, a benefit of $9.0 million and an expense of $3.2 million and $3.1$2.8 million, respectively, relating to accrual of interest, net of benefits for reversals of uncertain tax positions recognized upon settlements, effective settlements, or lapses of relevant statutes of limitation.
The total long-term asset related to the indemnification was $18.9$3.9 million and $29.5$13.5 million at December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively. Included in other expense (income) loss for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017,2020, is tax indemnification expense (income), net of $10.6$9.6 million, $(2.9)$7.1 million and $(8.4)$(2.2) million, respectively. For
On August 16, 2022, the year ended December 31, 2017, $6.5 million of the tax indemnification income is related to the impact of the U.S. federal tax rate reduction, and the remainder arises from increases“Inflation Reduction Act” (H.R. 5376) was signed into law in the indemnified liabilities.United States. We do not currently expect the Inflation Reduction Act to have a material impact on our financial results.
6. Inventory
Inventory consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Raw materials | $ | 19,987 | | | $ | 15,505 | |
| Work in process | 8,234 | | | 13,042 | |
| Finished goods | 7,254 | | | 6,582 | |
| Total inventory | $ | 35,475 | | | $ | 35,129 | |
Inventory costs associated with products that have not yet received regulatory approval are capitalized if the Company believes there is probable future commercial use of the product and future economic benefit of the asset. If future commercial use of the product is not probable, then inventory costs associated with such product are expensed during the period the costs are incurred. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had $6.1 million of such product costs included in inventories related to DEFINITY that had been
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Raw materials | $ | 11,417 |
| | $ | 11,100 |
|
| Work in process | 9,450 |
| | 4,261 |
|
| Finished goods | 8,313 |
| | 17,658 |
|
| Total inventory | $ | 29,180 |
| | $ | 33,019 |
|
7. Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
Property, plant and equipment, net, consisted of the following:
| | | | December 31, | | December 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | (in thousands) | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Land | $ | 13,450 |
| | $ | 13,450 |
| Land | $ | 13,450 | | | $ | 13,450 | |
| Buildings | 75,654 |
| | 64,444 |
| Buildings | 76,329 | | | 73,559 | |
| Machinery, equipment and fixtures | 87,763 |
| | 69,298 |
| Machinery, equipment and fixtures | 92,604 | | | 83,608 | |
| Computer software | 20,739 |
| | 19,266 |
| Computer software | 25,864 | | | 24,384 | |
| Construction in progress | 10,546 |
| | 24,169 |
| Construction in progress | 14,047 | | | 10,686 | |
| | 208,152 |
| | 190,627 |
| | 222,294 | | | 205,687 | |
| Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | (91,655 | ) | | (82,739 | ) | Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | (100,128) | | | (88,915) | |
| Total property, plant and equipment, net | $ | 116,497 |
| | $ | 107,888 |
| Total property, plant and equipment, net | $ | 122,166 | | | $ | 116,772 | |
Depreciation and amortization expense related to property, plant & equipment, net, was $10.3$13.7 million, $10.1$13.2 million and $14.8$12.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017,2020, respectively.
The Company tests long-lived assets for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying value of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company reviewed certain facts relating to an asset group that included the right-of-use (“ROU”) asset associated with the lease of office space in the World Trade Center (the “WTC lease”) in New York City and resulted in a change to the asset group due to the negotiation of a sublease. Please refer to Note 17, “Leases” for further details.
8. Business Combinations
On June 19, 2020, the Company completed the Progenics Acquisition. The acquisition combined the commercialization, supply chain and manufacturing expertise of the Company with the currently commercialized products and research and development pipeline of Progenics. Progenics brought to the Company several commercial products and a pipeline of product candidates that further diversify the Company’s commercial and clinical development portfolios.
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Company acquired all the issued and outstanding shares of Progenics common stock for a purchase price of $419.0 million by means of an all-stock transaction, which includes options to purchase Holdings common stock (“Replacement Stock Options”) for precombination services as well as CVRs.
The CVRs were accounted for as contingent consideration, the fair value of which was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation. Additionally, the fair value of the Replacement Stock Options was recorded as a component of consideration transferred. Finally, as a result of the Progenics Acquisition, Lantheus effectively settled an existing bridge loan with Progenics at the recorded amount (principal and accrued interest) of $10.1 million, representing the effective settlement of a preexisting relationship. This effective settlement of the bridge loan was treated as a component of consideration transferred. The Company determined that the bridge loan was at market terms and no gain or loss was recorded upon settlement.
The acquisition date fair value of the consideration transferred in the acquisition consisted of the following:
| | | | | |
| (in thousands) | Amount |
| Issuance of common stock | $ | 398,110 | |
| Fair value of replacement stock options | 7,125 | |
| Fair value of bridge loan settled at close | 10,074 | |
| Fair value of contingent considerations (CVRs) | 3,700 | |
| Total consideration transferred | $ | 419,009 | |
The transaction was accounted for as a business combination which requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at their fair value as of the acquisition date. While the Company uses its best estimates and assumptions as part of the purchase price allocation process to value the assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the acquisition date, its estimates and assumptions are subject to refinement. Fair value estimates are based on a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties and rely heavily on estimates and assumptions. The judgments used to determine the estimated fair value assigned to each class of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as asset lives, can materially impact the Company’s results of operations. The Company recorded a measurement period adjustment of $2.6 million related to deferred taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2021, which finalized all measurement period adjustments related to the Progenics Acquisition.
The following table summarizes the provisional amounts recognized for assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date, as well as measurement period adjustments made to the amounts initially recorded in June 2020. The measurement period adjustments primarily resulted from finalizing the fair values of certain intangible assets and liabilities, deferred taxes and other changes to certain tangible assets and liability accounts. Measurement period adjustments were recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustments were determined and calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The related impact to net loss that would have been recognized in previous periods if the adjustments were recognized as of the acquisition date is immaterial to the consolidated financial statements.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | Amounts Recognized as of Acquisition Date
(as previously reported) | | Measurement Period Adjustments | | Amounts Recognized as of Acquisition Date (as adjusted) |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 15,421 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 15,421 | |
| Accounts receivable | 5,787 | | | — | | | 5,787 | |
| Inventory | 915 | | | 160 | | | 1,075 | |
| Other current assets | 3,250 | | | 434 | | | 3,684 | |
| Property, plant and equipment | 14,972 | | | — | | | 14,972 | |
| Identifiable intangible assets (weighted-average useful life): | | | | | |
| Currently marketed product (15 years) | 142,100 | | | 800 | | | 142,900 | |
| Licenses (11.5 years) | 87,500 | | | (1,700) | | | 85,800 | |
| Developed technology (9 years) | 3,000 | | | (600) | | | 2,400 | |
| IPR&D | 150,900 | | | 200 | | | 151,100 | |
| Other long-term assets | 37,631 | | | — | | | 37,631 | |
| Accounts payable | (1,616) | | | — | | | (1,616) | |
| Accrued expenses and other liabilities | (8,207) | | | (80) | | | (8,287) | |
| Other long-term liabilities | (30,778) | | | (380) | | | (31,158) | |
| Long-term debt and other borrowings | (40,200) | | | — | | | (40,200) | |
| Deferred tax liabilities | (3,717) | | | (2,258) | | | (5,975) | |
| Goodwill | 42,051 | | | 3,424 | | | 45,475 | |
| Total consideration transferred | $ | 419,009 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 419,009 | |
Intangible assets acquired consist of currently marketed products, licenses, developed technology and in-process research and development (“IPR&D”). The fair value of the acquired intangible assets was determined based on estimated future revenues, royalty rates and discount rates, among other variables and estimates. The acquired intangible assets subject to amortization were assigned useful lives based on the expected use of the assets and the regulatory and economic environment within which they are being used and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the respective estimated useful lives. The estimated fair values of the IPR&D assets were determined based on the present values of the expected cash flows to be generated by the respective underlying assets. The Company used a discount rate of 23.0% and cash flows that have been probability adjusted to reflect the risks of product commercialization, which the Company believes are appropriate and representative of market participant assumptions.
As part of the Progenics Acquisition, the Company acquired the right to receive certain future milestone and royalty payments due to Progenics, related to a prior sale of certain intellectual property. The estimated fair value of the acquired contingent receivable of $10.1 million was determined by applying a probability adjusted discounted cash flow model based on estimated future expected payments and recorded in other long-term assets.
The goodwill recognized is attributable to future technologies that are not separately identifiable that could potentially add to the currently developed and pipeline products and Progenics’ assembled workforce. Future technologies did not meet the criteria for recognition separately from goodwill because they are part of the future development and growth of the business. Goodwill of $45.5 million recognized in connection with the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes.
The Company recognized $11.9 million of acquisition-related costs, including legal, accounting, compensation arrangements and other related fees that were expensed when incurred in the year ended December 31, 2020, respectively. These costs are recorded in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
Progenics Pro Forma Financial Information
Progenics has been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements since the acquisition date. Progenics contributed revenues of $12.4 million, as well as a net loss of $27.1 million to the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020.
The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the Company’s results as if the Progenics Acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2019:
| | | | | |
| Year Ended
December 31, 2020 |
| (in thousands) | Amount |
| Pro forma revenue | $ | 350,315 | |
| Pro forma net loss | $ | 29,190 | |
The unaudited pro forma financial information for all periods presented adjusts for the effects of material business combination items, including amortization of acquired intangible assets, transaction-related costs, adjustments to interest expense related to the assumption of long-term debt, retention and severance bonuses and the corresponding income tax effects of each. These pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of the operating results of the Company that would have been achieved had the Progenics Acquisition actually taken place on January 1, 2019. In addition, these results are not intended to be a projection of future results and do not reflect events that may occur after the Progenics Acquisition, including, but not limited to, revenue enhancements, cost savings or operating synergies that the combined company may achieve as a result of the Progenics Acquisition.
9. Sale of Puerto Rico Subsidiary
During the fourth quarter of 2020, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement (the “SPA”) with one of its existing radiopharmacy customers to sell all the stock of its Puerto Rico radiopharmacy subsidiary. The assets were classified as held for sale and the Company determined that the fair value of the net assets being sold significantly exceeded the carrying value as of December 31, 2020. The transaction was consummated on January 29, 2021.
The purchase price for the stock sale was $18.0 million in cash, which included a holdback amount of $1.8 million that was remitted to the Company as of December 31, 2021, and paid in the first quarter of 2022; the purchase price also included a working capital adjustment. The SPA contained customary representations, warranties and covenants by each of the parties. Subject to certain limitations, the buyer will be indemnified for damages resulting from breaches or inaccuracies of the Company’s representations, warranties and covenants in the SPA.
The Company determined that this sale of certain net assets did not constitute a strategic shift that had a major effect on the Company’s operations or financial results. As a result, this transaction was not classified as discontinued operations in the Company’s accompanying consolidated financial statements.
The following table summarizes the major classes of assets and liabilities sold as of January 29, 2021, the date of sale:
| | | | | |
| |
| (in thousands) | January 29, 2021 |
| Current Assets: | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 540 | |
| Accounts receivable, net | 1,959 | |
| Inventory | 530 | |
| Other current assets | 65 | |
| Total current assets | 3,094 | |
| Non-Current Assets: | |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 780 | |
| Intangibles, net | 96 | |
| Other long-term assets | 774 | |
| Total assets held for sale | $ | 4,744 | |
| |
| Current Liabilities: | |
| Accounts payable | $ | 185 | |
| Accrued expense and other liabilities | 369 | |
| Total current liabilities | 554 | |
| Non-Current Liabilities: | |
| Asset retirement obligations | 306 | |
| Other long-term liabilities | 588 | |
| Total liabilities held for sale | $ | 1,448 | |
The sale resulted in a pre-tax book gain of $15.3 million, which was recorded within operating income (loss) in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2021.
10. Asset Retirement Obligations
The Company considers its legal obligation to remediate its facilities upon a decommissioning of its radioactive-related operations as an asset retirement obligation. The Company has production facilities which manufacture and process radioactive materials at its North Billerica, Massachusetts and San Juan, Puerto RicoSomerset, New Jersey sites. As of December 31, 2019,2022, the liability is measured at the present value of the obligation expected to be incurred, of approximately $26.9$25.1 million.
The Company previously operated a production facility which manufactured and processed radioactive materials at its San Juan, Puerto Rico site. As of December 31, 2020, the liability for the San Juan, Puerto Rico site was recorded in liabilities held for sale and the sale was consummated on January 29, 2021.
The following table provides a summary of the changes in the Company’s asset retirement obligations:
| | | | | |
| (in thousands) | Amount |
| Balance, January 1, 2022 | $ | 20,833 | |
| Change in useful life estimate | 280 | |
| Accretion expense | 1,430 | |
| Balance, December 31, 2022 | $ | 22,543 | |
In December 2021, the Company evaluated the accretion timeline of an asset group due to a revision in the planned period of use at the North Billerica site. As a result of the accelerated timeline, the Company determined the asset group’s present value exceeded the current value recorded as of December 31, 2021. The Company recorded a non-cash adjustment of $5.3 million in 2021 to anticipate a revision in the end of useful life by the end of 2022.
|
| | | |
| (in thousands) | Amount |
| Balance, January 1, 2019 | $ | 11,572 |
|
| Revisions in estimated cash flows | 20 |
|
| Accretion expense | 1,291 |
|
| Balance, December 31, 2019 | $ | 12,883 |
|
The Company is required to provide the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Massachusetts Department of Public Health and New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection financial assurance demonstrating the Company’s ability to fund the decommissioning of its North Billerica, Massachusetts and Somerset, New Jersey production facilityfacilities upon closure, although the Company does not intendhas no current plans to close the facility.facilities. The Company has provided this financial assurance in the form of a $28.2$30.3 million surety bond.
9.11. Intangibles, Net and Goodwill
Intangibles, net, consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2022 |
| (in thousands) | Useful Lives (in years) | | Amortization
Method | | Cost | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net |
| Trademarks | 15 - 25 | | Straight-Line | | $ | 13,540 | | | $ | (12,061) | | | $ | 1,479 | |
| Customer relationships | 15 - 25 | | Accelerated | | 96,681 | | | (95,009) | | | 1,672 | |
| Currently marketed product | 9 - 15 | | Straight-Line | | 275,700 | | | (47,628) | | | 228,072 | |
| Licenses | 11 - 16 | | Straight-Line | | 85,800 | | | (19,101) | | | 66,699 | |
| Developed technology | 9 | | Straight-Line | | 2,400 | | | (677) | | | 1,723 | |
| IPR&D | N/A | | N/A | | 15,640 | | | — | | | 15,640 | |
| Total | | | | | $ | 489,761 | | | $ | (174,476) | | | $ | 315,285 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2019 |
| (in thousands) | Amortization
Method | | Cost | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net |
| Trademarks | Straight-Line | | $ | 13,540 |
| | $ | (10,407 | ) | | $ | 3,133 |
|
| Customer relationships | Accelerated | | 99,019 |
| | (94,816 | ) | | 4,203 |
|
| Total | | | $ | 112,559 |
| | $ | (105,223 | ) | | $ | 7,336 |
|
| | | | December 31, 2018 | | December 31, 2021 |
| (in thousands) | Amortization
Method | | Cost | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net | (in thousands) | Useful Lives (in years) | | Amortization
Method | | Cost | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net |
| Trademarks | Straight-Line | | $ | 13,540 |
| | $ | (9,856 | ) | | $ | 3,684 |
| Trademarks | 15 - 25 | | Straight-Line | | $ | 13,540 | | | $ | (11,510) | | | $ | 2,030 | |
| Customer relationships | Accelerated | | 98,912 |
| | (93,463 | ) | | 5,449 |
| Customer relationships | 15 - 25 | | Accelerated | | 96,880 | | | (94,630) | | | 2,250 | |
| Patents | Straight-Line | | 6,570 |
| | (6,570 | ) | | — |
| |
| Currently marketed product | | Currently marketed product | 15 | | Straight-Line | | 275,700 | | | (23,345) | | | 252,355 | |
| Licenses | | Licenses | 11 - 16 | | Straight-Line | | 85,800 | | | (11,555) | | | 74,245 | |
| Developed technology | | Developed technology | 9 | | Straight-Line | | 2,400 | | | (410) | | | 1,990 | |
| IPR&D | | IPR&D | N/A | | N/A | | 15,640 | | | — | | | 15,640 | |
| Total | | $ | 119,022 |
| | $ | (109,889 | ) | | $ | 9,133 |
| Total | | $ | 489,960 | | | $ | (141,450) | | | $ | 348,510 | |
The Company recorded amortization expense for its intangible assets of $1.8$33.2 million, $2.6$27.5 million and $3.3$10.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017,2020, respectively.
In May 2021, PyL (18F-DCFPyL) was approved by the FDA under the name PYLARIFY. Accordingly, the Company reclassified the associated asset of $132.8 million from IPR&D to currently marketed products and commenced amortization of the asset.
The Company performed its annual impairment test of its IPR&D intangible assets as of October 31, 2020. As a result of a timing delay in the development of an AZEDRA IPR&D intangible asset due to the impact of COVID-19, the Company determined that the carrying value of $18.3 million exceeded the fair value of the asset. Accordingly, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $2.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 in research and development expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. The estimated fair value of the AZEDRA IPR&D intangible asset was determined based on the present values of the expected cash flows. The Company used a discount rate of 23.0% and cash flows that have been probability adjusted to reflect the risks of product commercialization, which the Company believes are appropriate and representative of market participant assumptions.
The below table summarizes the estimated aggregate amortization expense expected to be recognized on the above intangible assets:
| | | | | |
| (in thousands) | Amount |
| 2023 | $ | 32,638 | |
| 2024 | 32,563 | |
| 2025 | 32,508 | |
| 2026 | 32,497 | |
| 2027 | 32,482 | |
| 2028 and thereafter | 136,957 | |
| Total | $ | 299,645 | |
Changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Balance, Beginning of year | $ | 61,189 | | | $ | 58,632 | |
| Increase from acquisition | — | | | 2,557 | |
| Balance, End of year | $ | 61,189 | | | $ | 61,189 | |
|
| | | |
| (in thousands) | Amount |
| 2020 | $ | 1,568 |
|
| 2021 | 1,311 |
|
| 2022 | 1,174 |
|
| 2023 | 579 |
|
| 2024 | 496 |
|
| 2025 and thereafter | 2,208 |
|
| Total | $ | 7,336 |
|
10.12. Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities and Other Long-Term Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other liabilities and other long-term liabilities are comprised of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Compensation and benefits | $ | 30,425 | | | $ | 22,730 | |
| Freight, distribution and operations | 49,067 | | | 16,157 | |
| Accrued rebates, discounts and chargebacks | 13,399 | | | 10,977 | |
| Accrued professional fees | 8,668 | | | 2,850 | |
| | | |
| Other | 25,525 | | | 5,354 | |
| Total accrued expenses and other liabilities | $ | 127,084 | | | $ | 58,068 | |
| | | |
| Operating lease liabilities (Note 17) | $ | 25,442 | | | $ | 16,546 | |
| Long-term contingent liability (Note 4) | 11,900 | | | 86,200 | |
| Other long-term liabilities | 8,813 | | | 22,148 | |
| Total other long-term liabilities | $ | 46,155 | | | $ | 124,894 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Compensation and benefits | $ | 15,100 |
| | $ | 15,962 |
|
| Freight, distribution and operations | 6,260 |
| | 7,721 |
|
| Accrued rebates, discounts and chargebacks | 6,985 |
| | 4,654 |
|
| Accrued professional fees | 6,917 |
| | 1,673 |
|
| Other | 2,098 |
| | 2,040 |
|
| Total accrued expenses and other liabilities | $ | 37,360 |
| | $ | 32,050 |
|
11.13. Long-Term Debt, Net, and Other Borrowings
As of December 31, 2022, the Company’s maturities of principal obligations under its long-term debt and other borrowings are as follows:
| | | | | |
| (in thousands) | Amount |
| 2023 | $ | — | |
| 2024 | — | |
| 2025 | — | |
| 2026 | — | |
| 2027 | 575,000 | |
| Total principal outstanding | 575,000 | |
| |
| Unamortized debt issuance costs | (17,519) | |
| Finance lease liabilities | 585 | |
| Total | 558,066 | |
| Less: current portion | (354) | |
| Total long-term debt, net, and other borrowings | $ | 557,712 | |
In June 2019,December 2022, the Company refinanced its previous $275existing credit facility, consisting of (i) a $200.0 million five-year term loan agreement (the “2017 Term Facility”) with a new five-year $200 million term loan facility (the “2019 Term Facility”) and the loans thereunder, the “2019 Term Loans”). In addition, the Company replaced its previous $75 million five-year revolving credit facility (the “2017 Revolving Facility”) with(ii) a new $200$200.0 million five-year revolving credit facility (the “2019 Revolving Facility” and, together with the 2019 Term Facility, the “2019 Facility”). The terms of, with a new $100.0 million delayed draw term loan facility (the “2022 Term Facility” and, the 2019loans thereunder, the “Term Loans”) and a new $350.0 million five-year revolving credit facility (the “2022 Revolving Facility” and, together with the 2022 Term Facility, are set forth in the Credit Agreement, dated as of June 27, 2019 (the “2019 Credit Agreement”“2022 Facility”), by and among Holdings, the Company, the lenders from time to time party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as.
administrative agent and collateral agent. The Company has the right to request an increase to the 2019 Term Facility or request the establishment of one or more new incremental term loan facilities, in an aggregate principal amount of up to $100 million, plus additional amounts, in certain circumstances.
The net proceeds of the 2019 Term Facility, together withused approximately $73$7.8 million of cash on hand wereto primarily repay the principal amount of the loans outstanding related to the 2019 Facility through the nine months ended September 30, 2022. In addition, in December 2022, the Company used approximately $167.6 million of cash on hand to refinancerepay in full the aggregate remaining principal amount of the loans outstanding under the 2017 Term2019 Facility and to pay related interest, transaction fees and expenses. No amounts were outstanding under the 2017 Revolving Facility at that time.
The Company accounted forpaid off the refinancing of the 20172019 Term Facility asusing available cash and did not utilize another term loan to fund the payoff. While the 2022 Term Facility allowed for a debt extinguishment anddelayed draw term loan, the 2017 Revolving Facility as a debt modification by evaluating the refinancing on a creditor by creditor basis.loan was not drawn upon. The Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $3.2$0.6 million related to the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs and debt discounts.discounts associated with the 2019 Term Facility. In addition, the Company incurred and capitalized $2.8$2.7 million of new debt issuancedeferred financing costs and debt discounts related to the refinancing.
20192022 Term Facility
The 2019Company expected to draw from the 2022 Term Facility only if a proposed offering of notes by the Company was not consummated. The commitment of the lenders to provide the 2022 Term Facility was terminated upon the completion of such note offering in December 2022. The 2022 Term Facility included a commitment fee equal to 0.20% per annum on the average daily unused amount of the 2022 Term Facility, which would have been payable commencing on January 16, 2023 and would have ended on the earliest of (i) the day the Term Loans under the 20192022 Term Facility bear interest, with pricing based from time to time at the Company’s election at (i) LIBOR plus a spread ranging from 1.25% to 2.25% as determined by the Company’s total net leverage ratio (as defined in the 2019 Credit Agreement) orwere funded, (ii) the Base Rate (as defined in the 2019 Credit Agreement) plus a spread ranging from 0.25% to 1.25% as determined by the Company’s total net leverage ratio. The uselast day of the LIBOR is expected to be phased out bydelayed draw availability period and (iii) the end of 2021. The 2019 Credit Agreement allows for a replacement interest rate inday the event the LIBOR is phased out. At December 31, 2019, the Company’s interest ratecommitments under the 20192022 Term Facility was 3.55%.
were reduced to zero. The Company is permitted to voluntarily prepaydid not draw from the 2019 Term Loans, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty. The 20192022 Term Facility requires the Company to make mandatory prepayments of the outstanding 2019 Term Loans in certain circumstances. The 2019 Term Loans mature in June 2024.and, as such, no interest is due under this instrument.
As of December 31, 2019, the Company’s maturities of principal obligations under its long-term debt and other borrowings are as follows:
|
| | | |
| (in thousands) | Amount |
| 2020 | $ | 10,000 |
|
| 2021 | 10,000 |
|
| 2022 | 11,250 |
|
| 2023 | 15,000 |
|
| 2024 | 148,750 |
|
| Total principal outstanding | 195,000 |
|
| Unamortized debt discount | (485 | ) |
| Unamortized debt issuance costs | (774 | ) |
| Finance lease liabilities | 329 |
|
| Total | 194,070 |
|
| Less: current portion | (10,143 | ) |
| Total long-term debt | $ | 183,927 |
|
20192022 Revolving Facility
Under the terms of the 20192022 Revolving Facility, the lenders thereunder agreedare committed to extendextending credit to the Company from time to time until June 27, 2024December 2, 2027 consisting of revolving loans (the “Revolving Loans” and, together with the 2019 Term Loans, the “Loans”) in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $200$350.0 million (the “Revolving Commitment”) at any time, outstanding. The 2019 Revolving Facility includesincluding a $20$20.0 million sub-facility for the issuance of letters of credit (the “Letters of Credit”). The 2019 Revolving Facility includes and a $10$10.0 million sub-facility for swingline loans (the “Swingline Loans”). The Letters of Credit, Swingline Loans and the borrowings under the 2019 Revolving FacilityLoans, if used, are expected to be used for working capital and for other general corporate purposes.
The Revolving Loans under the 2019 Revolving Facility bear interest, with pricing based from time to time at the Company’s election, at (i) LIBORthe secured overnight financing rate as published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on its website plus a spread rangingan applicable margin that ranges from 1.25%1.50% to 2.25% as determined by2.50% based on the Company’s total net leverage ratio or (ii) the Base Ratealternative base rate plus a spread rangingan applicable margin that ranges from 0.25%0.50% to 1.25% as determined by1.50% based on the Company’s total net leverage ratio. The 20192022 Revolving Facility also includes aan unused commitment fee which rangesat a rate ranging from 0.15% to 0.30% as determined by0.35% per annum based on the Company’s total net leverage ratio.
The Company is permitted to voluntarily prepay the Revolving Loans, in whole or in part, or reduce or terminate the Revolving Commitment, in each case, without premium or penalty. On any business day on which the total amount of outstanding Revolving
Loans, and Letters of Credit and Swingline Loans exceeds the total Revolving Commitment, the Company must prepay the Revolving
Loans in an amount equal to such excess. The Company is not required to make mandatory prepayments under the 2022 Revolving Facility. As of December 31, 2019,2022, there were no outstanding borrowings under the 20192022 Revolving Facility.
2019The Company has the right to request an increase to the Revolving Commitment in an aggregate principal amount of up to the sum of $335.0 million or consolidated EBITDA for the four consecutive fiscal quarters most recently ended, plus additional amounts in certain circumstances (collectively, the “Incremental Cap”), minus certain incremental term loans made pursuant to specified incremental term loan commitments (“Incremental Term Loans”). The Company has the right to request Incremental Term Loans in an aggregate principal amount of up to the Incremental Cap less any incremental increases to the Revolving Commitment. Proceeds of Incremental Term Loans may be used for working capital and for other general corporate purposes and will bear interest at rates agreed between the Company and the lenders providing the Incremental Term Loans.
2022 Facility Covenants
The 20192022 Facility contains a number of affirmative, negative and reporting andcovenants, as well as financial maintenance covenants in each case subjectpursuant to certain exceptions and materiality thresholds. The 2019 Facility requireswhich the Company is required to be in quarterly compliance, measured on a trailing four quarter basis, with two financial covenants. The minimum interest coverage ratio, commencing with the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2019,ended December 31, 2022, must be at least 3.00 to 1.00. The maximum total net leverage ratio permitted by the financial covenant is displayed in the table below:
2019 Facility Financial Covenant |
| | | | |
| Period | Consolidated
Total Net Leverage Ratio |
Q1 20202023 to Q2 2020Q4 2023 | 4.00 to 1.00 |
Q3 2020 to Q2 2021 | 3.75 to 1.00 |
ThereafterQ1 2024 and thereafter | 3.50 to 1.00 |
The Company may elect to increase the maximum total net leverage ratio by 0.50 to 1.00 (subject to a maximum of 4.25 to 1.00) up to two separate times during the term of the 2019 Facility in connection with any Material Acquisition (as defined in the Credit Agreement).
The 20192022 Facility contains usual and customary restrictions on the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to: (i) incur additional indebtedness (ii) create liens; (iii) consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of its assets; (iv) sell certain assets; (v) pay dividends on, repurchase or make distributions in respect of capital stock or make other restricted payments; (vi) make certain investments; (vii) repay subordinated indebtedness prior to stated maturity; and (viii) enter into certain transactions with its affiliates.
Upon an event of default, the administrative agent under the Credit AgreementAdministrative Agent will have the right to declare the Loansloans and other obligations outstanding under the 2022 Facility immediately due and payable and all commitments immediately terminated or reduced.terminated.
The 20192022 Facility is guaranteed by Holdings, and certain subsidiaries of LMI, including Progenics and Lantheus MI Real Estate, LLC, and obligations under the 20192022 Facility are generally secured by first priority liens over substantially all of the assets of each of LMI, Holdings, and certain subsidiaries of LMI, including Progenics and Lantheus MI Real Estate, LLC (subject to customary exclusions set forth in the transaction documents) owned as of June 27, 2019December 2, 2022 or thereafter acquired.
12.On December 8, 2022, the Company issued $575.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 2.625% Convertible Senior Notes due 2027 (the “Notes”), which includes $75.0 million in aggregate principal amount of Notes sold pursuant to the full exercise of the initial purchasers’ option to purchase additional Notes. The Notes were issued under an indenture, dated as of December 8, 2022 (the “Indenture”), among the Company, LMI (the “Guarantor”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee. The net proceeds from the issuance of the Notes were approximately $557.8 million after deducting the initial purchasers’ discounts and offering expenses payable by the Company.
The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company. The Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by the Guarantor. The Notes bear interest at a rate of 2.625% per year, payable semi-annually in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning on June 15, 2023, and will mature on December 15, 2027 unless earlier redeemed, repurchased or converted in accordance with their terms. The initial conversion rate for the Notes is 12.5291 shares of the Company’s common stock per $1,000 in principal amount of Notes (which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $79.81 per share of the Company’s common stock, representing an initial conversion premium of approximately 42.5% above the closing price of $56.01 per share of the Company’s common stock on December 5, 2022). In no event shall the conversation rate per $1,000 in principal amount of notes exceed 17.8539 shares of the Company’s common stock. Prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding September 15, 2027, the Notes may be converted at the option of the holders only upon occurrence of specified events and during certain periods, and thereafter until the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the maturity date, the Notes may be converted at any time. The Company will satisfy any conversion by paying cash up to the aggregate principal amount of the Notes to be converted and by paying or delivering, as the case may be, cash, shares of the Company’s common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of the Company’s common stock, at its election, in respect of the remainder, if any, of its conversion obligation in excess of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes being converted. The Company may redeem for cash all or any
portion of the Notes, at its option, on or after December 22, 2025 if the closing sale price per share of the Company’s common stock exceeds 130% of the conversion price of the Notes for a specified period of time. The redemption price will be equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the redemption date.
The Company evaluated the Notes upon completion of the sale and concluded on the following features:
•Conversion Feature: The Company determined that the conversion feature qualifies for the classification of equity. As a result, the conversion feature should not be bifurcated as a derivative instrument and the Notes were accounted for as a single liability.
•Redemption Features: The redemption features were reviewed within the Notes and the Company determined that the redemption features are closely related to the Notes and as such should not be separately accounted for as a bifurcated derivative instrument.
•Additional Interest Features: The Notes may result in additional interest if the Company fails to timely file any document or report that the Company is required to file with the SEC pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company will pay additional interest on the notes at a rate equal to 0.25% to 0.50% per annum based on the principal amount of notes outstanding for each day the Company failure to file has occurred or the notes are not otherwise freely tradable. Further, if the notes are assigned a restricted CUSIP number or the notes are not otherwise freely tradable pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act by holders other than our affiliates or holders that were our affiliates at any time during the three months immediately preceding as of the 385th day after the last date of original issuance of the notes offered hereby, the Company will pay additional interest on the notes at a rate equal to (i) 0.25% to 0.50% per annum based on the principal amount of notes outstanding for each day until the restrictive legend has been removed from the notes, the notes are assigned an unrestricted CUSIP and the notes are freely tradable. The Company concluded that the interest feature is unrelated to the credit risk and should be bifurcated from the Notes, however, the Company assessed the probabilities of triggering events occurring under these features and does not expect to trigger the aforementioned events. These events will continue to be monitored to determine whether the interest feature will be bifurcated if it has value.
As of December 31, 2022, the carrying value of the Notes was $575.0 million, had an unamortized discount of zero, and the fair value of the liability was $575.0 million. The Company recorded interest expense of approximately $1.3 million related to the Notes for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Royalty-Backed Loan
On June 19, 2020, as a result of the acquisition, the Company assumed Progenics’ outstanding debt as of such date in the amount of $40.2 million. Progenics, through a wholly-owned subsidiary MNTX Royalties Sub LLC (“MNTX Royalties”), entered into a $50.0 million loan agreement (the “Royalty-Backed Loan”) with a fund managed by HealthCare Royalty Partners III, L.P. (“HCRP”) on November 4, 2016. The Royalty-Backed Loan bore interest at a per annum rate of 9.5% and was scheduled to mature on June 30, 2025.
On March 31, 2021, the Company voluntarily repaid in full the entire outstanding principal on the Royalty-Backed Loan in the amount of $30.9 million, which included a prepayment amount of $0.5 million, and terminated the agreement governing the Royalty-Backed Loan. The Company recorded a gain on extinguishment of debt of $0.9 million related to the write-off of an unamortized debt premium offset by the prepayment amount.
14. Derivative Instruments
The Company has used interest rate swaps to reduce the variability in cash flows associated with a portion of the Company’s forecasted interest payments on its variable rate debt. In March 2020, the Company entered into interest rate swap contracts to fix the LIBOR rate on a notional amount of $100.0 million through May 31, 2024. The average fixed LIBOR rate on the interest rate swaps was approximately 0.82%. This agreement involved the receipt of floating rate amounts in exchange for fixed rate interest payments over the life of the agreement without an exchange of the underlying principal amount. The interest rate swaps were designated as cash flow hedges. In accordance with hedge accounting, the interest rate swaps are recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets at fair value, and changes in the fair value of the swap agreements were recorded to other comprehensive loss and reclassified to interest expense in the period during which the hedged transaction affected earnings or it will become probable that the forecasted transaction would not occur.
On December 2, 2022, the Company voluntarily terminated the interest rate swap contracts in connection with the refinancing of debt. Upon termination, the Company received approximately $5.6 million in cash and the remaining balance of approximately $5.5 million in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to the interest rate swap contracts were reclassified into earnings.
The following table presents the location and fair value amounts of derivative instruments reported in the consolidated balance sheet:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | | December 31, 2022 | | December 31, 2021 |
| Derivatives type | Classification | | | |
| Assets: | | | | |
| Interest rate swap | Other long-term assets | $ | — | | | $ | 357 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
15. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, net of tax of zero and $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | Foreign currency translation | | Unrealized loss on cash flow hedges | | Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
| Balance at January 1, 2022 | $ | (754) | | | $ | 269 | | | $ | (485) | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | (505) | | | 5,838 | | | 5,333 | |
| Amounts reclassified to earnings | — | | | (6,107) | | | (6,107) | |
| Balance at December 31, 2022 | $ | (1,259) | | | $ | — | | | $ | (1,259) | |
| | | | | |
| Balance at January 1, 2021 | $ | (630) | | | $ | (1,418) | | | $ | (2,048) | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | (124) | | | 962 | | | 838 | |
| Amounts reclassified to earnings | — | | | 725 | | | 725 | |
| Balance at December 31, 2021 | $ | (754) | | | $ | 269 | | | $ | (485) | |
16. Stock-Based Compensation
Equity Incentive Plans
As of December 31, 2019,2022, the Company’s approved equity incentive plans included the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (“2015 Plan”), the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (“2013 Plan”), and the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (“2008 Plan”). These plans are administered by the Board of Directors and permit the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and dividend equivalent rights (“DERs”) to employees, officers, directors and consultants of the Company.
The Company has certain stock option and restricted stock awards outstanding under each of its equity incentive plans but, upon adoption of the 2015 Plan, no longer grants new equity awards under its 2008 and 2013 Plans. The Company adopted its 2015 Plan in June 2015 and subsequently amended the plan in April 2016, 2017, 2019, 2021 and 20192022 which increased the common stock reserved for issuance under the plan to an aggregate 6,580,27710,930,277 shares. The Company assumed Progenics equity plans due to the acquisition as discussed in Note 1, “Description of Business”. The Company no longer grants new equity awards under the Progenics equity plans.
Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statements of operations is summarized below:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Cost of goods sold | $ | 2,091 |
| | $ | 1,140 |
| | $ | 1,692 |
|
| Sales and marketing | 1,953 |
| | 1,244 |
| | 640 |
|
| General and administrative | 6,990 |
| | 4,990 |
| | 2,964 |
|
| Research and development | 1,458 |
| | 1,344 |
| | 632 |
|
| Total stock-based compensation expense | $ | 12,492 |
| | $ | 8,718 |
| | $ | 5,928 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Cost of goods sold | $ | 4,422 | | | $ | 2,370 | | | $ | 2,820 | |
| Sales and marketing | 6,185 | | | 2,472 | | | 1,821 | |
| General and administrative | 14,876 | | | 9,092 | | | 7,333 | |
| Research and development | 3,779 | | | 2,000 | | | 2,101 | |
| Total stock-based compensation expense | $ | 29,262 | | | $ | 15,934 | | | $ | 14,075 | |
Stock Options
Stock option awards under the 2015 Plan are granted with an exercise price equal to the fair value of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant. All option awards have a ten-year contractual term.
A summary of option activity for 20192022 is presented below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Total
Stock
Options | | Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price | | Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years) | | Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value |
| Balance at January 1, 2022 | | | | | 972,939 | | | $ | 18.73 | | | 4.7 | | 10,145,135 | |
| Options granted | | | | | 317,789 | | | $ | 53.55 | | | | | |
| Options exercised | | | | | (397,822) | | | $ | 20.07 | | | | | |
| Options cancelled and forfeited | | | | | (18,157) | | | $ | 38.20 | | | | | |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2022 | | | | | 874,749 | | | $ | 30.37 | | | 5.8 | | 19,058,224 | |
| Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2022 | | | | | 874,749 | | | $ | 30.37 | | | 5.8 | | 19,058,224 | |
| Exercisable at December 31, 2022 | | | | | 517,424 | | | $ | 17.83 | | | 3.6 | | 17,141,202 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Total Stock Options | | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | | Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
| Balance at January 1, 2019 | | 357,075 |
| | $ | 17.50 |
| | | | |
| Options granted | | — |
| | $ | — |
| | | | |
| Options exercised | | (67,558 | ) | | $ | 17.37 |
| | | | |
| Options cancelled and expired | | (17,293 | ) | | $ | 18.66 |
| | | | |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2019 | | 272,224 |
| | $ | 17.44 |
| | 3.7 | | 1,096,000 |
|
| Exercisable at December 31, 2019 | | 272,224 |
| | $ | 17.44 |
| | 3.7 | | 1,096,000 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Expected volatility | | 62.1 | % | | — | % | | 71.1 | % |
| Risk-free interest rate | | 2.0 | % | | — | % | | 0.3 | % |
| Expected life (in years) | | 6.0 | | — | | 3.5 |
| Expected dividend yield | | — | | — | | — |
During the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017, 67,558, 192,5502020, 397,822, 318,662 and 465,2328,868 options were exercised having aggregate intrinsic values of $0.6$13.1 million,, $2.4 $1.6 million and $5.1$0.1 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2022, there was $7.0 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to outstanding stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years.
Restricted Stock
A summary of restricted stock awards and restricted stock units activity for 20192022 is presented below:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Shares | | Weighted-
Average Grant
Date Fair Value Per Share |
| Nonvested balance at January 1, 2022 | 1,330,374 | | | $ | 19.04 | |
| Granted | 649,672 | | | $ | 51.51 | |
| Vested | (624,069) | | | $ | 19.11 | |
| Forfeited | (105,985) | | | $ | 30.81 | |
| Nonvested balance at December 31, 2022 | 1,249,992 | | | $ | 34.65 | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | Shares | | Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share |
| Nonvested balance at January 1, 2019 | 1,508,539 |
| | $ | 9.51 |
|
| Granted | 409,821 |
| | $ | 23.33 |
|
| Vested | (795,503 | ) | | $ | 8.52 |
|
| Forfeited | (91,085 | ) | | $ | 15.84 |
|
| Nonvested balance at December 31, 2019 | 1,031,772 |
| | $ | 15.20 |
|
Restricted stock generally vest over 3 years. As of December 31, 2019,2022, there was $9.9$30.1 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to outstanding restricted stock, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years.
The weighted average grant-date fair value for restricted stock granted during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020 was $23.33, $15.46$51.51, $20.14 and $12.94$15.00 per share, respectively. The total fair value of restricted stock vested in fiscal years 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020 was $6.8$11.9 million, $4.3$8.8 million and $2.9$7.6 million, respectively.
Performance Restricted Stock Awards
Performance awards vest based on the requisite service period subject to the achievement of specific financial performance targets. The Company monitors the probability of achieving the performance targets on a quarterly basis and may adjust periodic stock compensation expense accordingly. The performance targets include the achievement of internal performance targets only.
A summary of performance restricted stock award activity for 2019 is presented below:
|
| | | | | | |
| | Shares | | Weighted-
Average Grant
Date Fair Value Per Share |
| Nonvested balance at January 1, 2019 | 241,880 |
| | $ | 16.71 |
|
| Granted | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Vested | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Forfeited | (15,870 | ) | | $ | 18.10 |
|
| Nonvested balance at December 31, 2019 | 226,010 |
| | $ | 16.62 |
|
As of December 31, 2019, there was $0.4 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to outstanding performance restricted stock which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.2 years.
The weighted average grant-date fair value for performance restricted stock granted during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 was $16.69 per share.
Total Stockholder Return Restricted Stock Awards (“TSR Awards”)
During the years ended December 31, 20192022, 2021 and 2018,2020, the Company granted total stockholder return (“TSR”) Awards that include a three-year market condition where the performance measurement period is three years. Vesting of the TSR Awards is based on the Company’s level of attainment of specified TSR targets relative to the percentage appreciation of a specified index of companies for the respective three-year period and is also subject to the continued employment of the grantees. The number of shares
that are earned over the performance period ranges from 0% to 200% of the initial award. The fair value of these awards are based on a Monte Carlo Simulationsimulation valuation model with the following assumptions:
| | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Expected volatility | | 71.7 | % | | 84.3 | % | Expected volatility | | 56.6 | % | | 54.0 | % | | 53.3 | % |
| Risk-free interest rate | | 2.4 | % | | 2.4 | % | Risk-free interest rate | | 1.7 | % | | 0.3 | % | | 0.7 | % |
| Expected life (in years) | | 2.9 |
| | 2.8 |
| Expected life (in years) | | 2.8 | | 2.8 | | 2.8 |
| Expected dividend yield | | — |
| | — |
| Expected dividend yield | | — | | — | | — |
A summary of TSR Award activity for 20192022 is presented below:
| | | | | | | Shares | | Weighted-
Average Grant
Date Fair Value Per Share |
| | Shares | | Weighted-
Average Grant
Date Fair Value Per Share | |
| Nonvested balance at January 1, 2019 | 179,913 |
| | $ | 22.76 |
| |
| Nonvested balance at January 1, 2022 | | Nonvested balance at January 1, 2022 | 590,073 | | | $ | 30.49 | |
| Granted | 152,869 |
| | $ | 39.92 |
| Granted | 304,212 | | | $ | 95.31 | |
| Vested | — |
| | $ | — |
| Vested | (220,339) | | | $ | 39.92 | |
| Forfeited | (26,552 | ) | | $ | 31.64 |
| Forfeited | (15,071) | | | $ | 31.30 | |
| Nonvested balance at December 31, 2019 | 306,230 |
| | $ | 30.56 |
| |
| Nonvested balance at December 31, 2022 | | Nonvested balance at December 31, 2022 | 658,875 | | | $ | 48.58 | |
As of December 31, 2019,2022, there was $5.8$18.9 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to outstanding performance restricted stock which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.92.0 years.
The weighted average grant-date fair value for TSR Awards granted during the fiscal years ended December 31, 20192022, 2021 and 20182020 was $39.92$95.31, $31.25 and $22.76$23.43 per share, respectively. The total fair value of TSR Awards vested in fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020 was $8.8 million, $2.0 million and zero, respectively.
EmployeeCommon Stock Purchase PlanRepurchases
In April 2017,December 2022, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2017 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“2017 ESPP”), whichBoard of Directors authorized the issuancerepurchase of up to 250,000 shares of common stock thereunder. Under the terms of the 2017 ESPP, eligible U.S. employees can elect to acquire shares$150.0 million in aggregate amount of the Company’s common stock under certain circumstances. The Company used approximately $75.0 million of the net proceeds from the Notes to repurchase shares of their common stock from purchasers of the Notes in privately negotiated transactions effected with or through periodic payroll deductions during a seriesone of six month offering periods, which will generally beginthe initial purchasers or its affiliate. The purchase price per share of the common stock repurchased in March and September of each year. Purchases under the 2017 ESPP are effected on the last business day of each offering period at a 15% discountsuch transactions was equal to the closing sale price per share of the Company’s common stock on that day. The 2017 ESPP was implemented, subject to stockholder approval, on March 10, 2017, and the first purchases thereunder were made on September 13, 2017.
13. Leases
Adoption of ASC Topic 842, “Leases”
The Company adopted ASC 842 on January 1, 2019, using the prospective approach which provides a method for recording existing leases at adoption using the effective date of the standard as itsoffering memorandum used for the Notes, which was $56.01 per share. Following this initial application date. ASC 842 generally requires all leasesrepurchase, The Company may from time to be recognized ontime repurchase additional shares of their common stock. In the balance sheet. In addition,year ended December 31, 2022, the Company electedpurchased approximately 1.3 million shares of their outstanding common stock for $75.0 million as part of the relief packageprogram. The Company did not purchase any shares of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard, which, among other things, allowed the Company not to reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, the lease classification for any expired or existing leases and initial direct costs for any existing leases. The reported results for 2019 reflect the application of ASC 842 guidance while the reported results for 2018 were prepared under the guidance of ASC 840, Leases. The adoption of ASC 842 resultedtheir outstanding common stock in the recording of an additional lease assetyears ended December 31, 2021 and lease liability of approximately $1.1 million as of January 1, 2019. ASC 842 did not materially impact the Company’s consolidated results of operations, equity or cash flows as of the adoption date or for the periods presented.2020, respectively.
17. Leases
The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. The Company has operating and finance leases for vehicles, corporate offices and certain equipment.
Operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at commencement date. Lease agreements with lease and non-lease components are accounted for separately. As the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company used the incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of future payments. The operating lease ROU asset also includes any lease payments made and excludes lease incentives and initial direct costs incurred. The lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option. Lease expense for minimum lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company assumed two operating leases as a result of the Progenics acquisition related to office space at the World Trade Center in New York City, pursuant to a lease agreement expiring in September 2030 (the “WTC Lease”), and a radiopharmaceutical manufacturing facility in Somerset, New Jersey, under a sublease agreement expiring in November 2028, which were recorded as of June 19, 2020, for $18.6 million and $0.6 million, respectively. The Company entered into an operating lease related to office space in Somerset, New Jersey, under a lease agreement expiring in August 2026, which was recorded in October 2021 for $0.7 million. The Company entered into an operating
lease agreement in February 2022 to lease office space in Bedford, Massachusetts, under a lease agreement expiring in June 2031, which commenced and was recorded in December 2022 for $11.0 million.
Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet as the Company has elected to apply the short-term lease exemption. The Company recognizes lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Operating and finance lease assets and liabilities are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | Classification | December 31, 2022 | | December 31, 2021 |
| Assets | | | | |
| Operating | Other long-term assets | $ | 19,033 | | | $ | 8,788 | |
| Finance | Property, plant and equipment, net | 582 | | | 556 | |
| Total leased assets | | $ | 19,615 | | | $ | 9,344 | |
| Liabilities | | | | |
| Current | | | | |
| Operating | Accrued expenses and other liabilities | $ | 2,177 | | | $ | 1,599 | |
| Finance | Current portion of long-term debt and other borrowings | 354 | | | 392 | |
| Noncurrent | | | | |
| Operating | Other long-term liabilities | 25,442 | | | 16,546 | |
| Finance | Long-term debt, net and other borrowings | 231 | | | 299 | |
| Total leased liabilities | | $ | 28,204 | | | $ | 18,836 | |
|
| | | | |
| (in thousands) | Classification | December 31, 2019 |
| Assets | | |
| Operating | Other long-term assets | $ | 935 |
|
| Finance | Property, plant and equipment, net | 348 |
|
| Total leased assets | | $ | 1,283 |
|
| Liabilities | | |
| Current | | |
|
| Operating | Accrued expenses and other liabilities | $ | 193 |
|
| Finance | Current portion of long-term debt and other borrowings | 143 |
|
| Noncurrent | | |
| Operating | Other long-term liabilities | 812 |
|
| Finance | Long-term debt, net and other borrowings | 186 |
|
| Total leased liabilities | | $ | 1,334 |
|
The components of lease expense were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | Year Ended
December 31, 2022 | | Year Ended
December 31, 2021 |
| Operating lease expense | $ | 1,797 | | | $ | 2,312 | |
| Finance lease expense | | | |
| Amortization of ROU assets | 426 | | | 330 | |
| Interest on lease liabilities | 28 | | | 28 | |
| Short-term lease expense | — | | | 8 | |
| Total lease expense | $ | 2,251 | | | $ | 2,678 | |
|
| | | |
| (in thousands) | Year Ended
December 31, 2019 |
| Operating lease expense | $ | 223 |
|
| Finance lease expense | |
| Amortization of ROU assets | 167 |
|
| Interest on lease liabilities | 11 |
|
| Short-term lease expense | 91 |
|
| Total lease expense | $ | 492 |
|
Other information related to leases were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2022 | | | December 31, 2021 |
| Weighted-average remaining lease term (Years): | | | | | |
| Operating leases | | 7.9 | | | 8.6 |
| Finance leases | | 1.9 | | | 2.2 |
| Weighted-average discount rate: | | | | | |
| Operating leases | | 4.8% | | | 4.4% |
| Finance leases | | 4.4% | | | 4.6% |
| | | | | |
| (in thousands) | | Year Ended
December 31, 2022 | | | Year Ended
December 31, 2021 |
| Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: | | | | | |
| Operating cash flows from operating leases | $ | 2,440 | | $ | 2,071 |
| Operating cash flows from finance leases | | 28 | | | 28 |
| Financing cash flows from finance leases | | 384 | | | 339 |
| ROU assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations: | | | | | |
| Operating leases | | 11,019 | | | 683 |
| Finance leases | | 582 | | | 556 |
|
| |
| December 31, 2019 |
Weighted-average remaining lease term (Years): | |
Operating leases | 4.8 |
Finance leases | 2.5 |
Weighted-average discount rate: | |
Operating leases | 5.1% |
Finance leases | 5.4% |
| |
(in thousands) | Year Ended
December 31, 2019 |
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: | |
Operating cash flows from operating leases | 230 |
Operating cash flows from finance leases | 11 |
Financing cash flows from finance leases | 190 |
ROU assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations: | |
Operating leases | — |
Finance leases | 379 |
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable leases as of December 31, 20192022 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | Operating Leases | | Finance Leases |
| 2023 | $ | 3,462 | | | $ | 366 | |
| 2024 | 3,887 | | | 203 | |
| 2025 | 4,147 | | | 49 | |
| 2026 | 4,245 | | | — | |
| 2027 | 4,381 | | | — | |
| Thereafter | 13,599 | | | — | |
| Total future minimum lease payments | 33,721 | | | 618 | |
| Less: interest | 6,102 | | | 33 | |
| Total | $ | 27,619 | | | $ | 585 | |
18. Other Assets
Other assets are comprised of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Prepaid Expenses | $ | 12,887 | | | $ | 10,113 | |
| Current Contingent Asset (Note 4) | — | | | 2,500 | |
| Other Current Assets | 205 | | | 205 | |
| Total other current assets | $ | 13,092 | | | $ | 12,818 | |
| | | |
| ROU Asset (Note 17) | $ | 19,033 | | | $ | 8,788 | |
| Long-term Contingent Asset (Note 4) | — | | | 6,800 | |
| Other Long-Term Assets | 15,322 | | | 23,170 | |
| Total other long-term assets | $ | 34,355 | | | $ | 38,758 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | Operating Leases | | Finance Leases |
| 2020 | $ | 238 |
| | $ | 135 |
|
| 2021 | 238 |
| | 136 |
|
| 2022 | 238 |
| | 83 |
|
| 2023 | 238 |
| | — |
|
| 2024 | 178 |
| | — |
|
| Total future minimum lease payments | 1,130 |
| | 354 |
|
| Less: interest | 125 |
| | 25 |
|
| Total | $ | 1,005 |
| | $ | 329 |
|
14.19. Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
A summary of net income (loss) per common share is presented below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
December 31, |
| (in thousands, except per share amounts) | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Net income (loss) | $ | 28,067 | | | $ | (71,279) | | | $ | (13,473) | |
| | | | | |
| Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding | 68,487 | | | 67,486 | | | 54,134 | |
| Effect of dilutive stock options | 439 | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | |
| Effect of dilutive restricted stock | 1,745 | | | — | | | — | |
| Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding | 70,671 | | | 67,486 | | | 54,134 | |
| | | | | |
| Basic income (loss) per common share | $ | 0.41 | | | $ | (1.06) | | | $ | (0.25) | |
| Diluted income (loss) per common share | $ | 0.40 | | | $ | (1.06) | | | $ | (0.25) | |
| | | | | |
| Antidilutive securities excluded from diluted net income (loss) per common share | 358 | | | 2,893 | | | 3,175 | |
Impact of the Notes
The Company considered whether the notes are participating securities through the two-class method. The Company determined that if a cash dividend is paid that is greater than the then stock price, the holder of notes will receive cash on an if-converted basis. While this feature is considered to be a participating right; basic earnings per share is only impacted if the Company’s earning exceeds the current share price, regardless of whether such dividend is declared. During the year ended December 31, 2022, no such dividend was declared. In addition, the Company is required to settle the principal amount of the Notes in cash upon conversion, and therefore, the Company uses the if-converted method for calculating any potential dilutive effect of the conversion option on diluted net income per share, if applicable, unless the application of the two-class method is dilutive. The conversion option will have a dilutive impact on net income per share of Common Stock when the average market price per share of the Company's Common Stock for a given period exceeds the conversion price of the Notes of $79.81 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the weighted average price per share of the Company's Common Stock was below the conversion price of the Notes.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
December 31, |
| (in thousands, except per share amounts) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Net income | $ | 31,667 |
| | $ | 40,518 |
| | $ | 123,385 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding | 38,988 |
| | 38,233 |
| | 37,276 |
|
| Effect of dilutive stock options | 75 |
| | 61 |
| | 288 |
|
| Effect of dilutive restricted stock | 1,050 |
| | 1,207 |
| | 1,328 |
|
| Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding | 40,113 |
| | 39,501 |
| | 38,892 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Basic income per common share | $ | 0.81 |
| | $ | 1.06 |
| | $ | 3.31 |
|
| Diluted income per common share | $ | 0.79 |
| | $ | 1.03 |
| | $ | 3.17 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Antidilutive securities excluded from diluted net income per common share | 50 |
| | 424 |
| | 604 |
|
15.20. Commitments and Contingencies
Purchase Commitments
The Company has entered into purchasing arrangements in which minimum quantities of goods or services have been committed to be purchased on an annual basis.
As of December 31, 2019,2022, future payments required under purchase commitments are as follows:
|
| | | |
| (in thousands) | Amount |
| 2020 | $ | 4,132 |
|
| 2021 | 4,132 |
|
| 2022 | 2,066 |
|
| Total | $ | 10,330 |
|
| | | | | |
| (in thousands) | Amount |
| 2023 | 5,716 | |
| 2024 | 2,716 | |
| 2025 | 2,716 | |
| 2026 | 2,716 | |
| 2027 and thereafter | 2,716 | |
| Total | $ | 16,580 | |
The Company has entered into agreements which contain certain percentage volume purchase requirements. The Company has excluded these future purchase commitments from the table above since there are no minimum purchase commitments or payments under these agreements.
License Agreements
The Company has entered into license agreements in which fixed payments have been committed to be paid on an annual basis.
As of December 31, 2022, future fixed payments required under license agreements are $0.1 million. The Company may be required to pay additional amounts up to approximately $200.0 million in contingent payments under the Company’s license agreements. These contingent payments include potential milestone or contractual payment obligations contingent upon the
achievement or occurrence of future milestones or events and the amounts and timing of such potential obligations are unknown or uncertain.
Legal Proceedings
From time to time, the Company is a party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. In addition, the Company has in the past been, and may in the future be, subject to investigations by governmental and regulatory authorities, which expose it to greater risks associated with litigation, regulatory or other proceedings, as a result of which the Company could be required to pay significant fines or penalties. The costs and outcome of litigation, regulatory or other proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, and some lawsuits, claims, actions or proceedings may be disposed of unfavorably to the Company and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition. In addition, intellectual property disputes often have a risk of injunctive relief which, if imposed against the Company, could materially and adversely affect its financial condition or results of operations.
In October 2019, If a matter is both probable to result in material liability and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated, the Company was awardedestimates and discloses the possible material loss or range of loss. If such loss is not probable or cannot be reasonably estimated, a total of approximately $3.5 million, consisting of damages, pre-judgment interest, and certain arbitration fees, compensation and expensesliability is not recorded in its arbitration with Pharmalucence in connection with a Manufacturing and Supply Agreement dated November 12, 2013, under which Pharmalucence agreed to manufacture and supply DEFINITY for the Company. The commercial arrangement contemplated by that agreement was repeatedly delayed and ultimately never successfully realized. After extended settlement discussions between Sun Pharma, the ultimate parent of Pharmalucence, and the Company, which did not lead to a mutually acceptable outcome, on November 10, 2017, the Company filed an arbitration demand (and later an amended arbitration demand) with the American Arbitration Association against Pharmalucence, alleging breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, tortious misrepresentation and violation of the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Law,
also known as Chapter 93A. In November 2019, the Company received proceeds of $3.5 million, which is recorded in other expense (income) in the consolidated statement of operations.financial statements.
As of December 31, 2019, except as disclosed above2022, the Company had nodid not have any material ongoing litigation into which the Company was a party. In addition, the Company had no material ongoing regulatory or other proceedings and no knowledge of any investigations by government or regulatory authorities in which the Company is a target, in either case that the Company believes could have a material and adverse effect on its current business.
16.21. 401(k) Plan
The Company maintains a qualified 401(k) plan (the “401(k) Plan”) for its U.S. employees. The 401(k) Plan covers U.S. employees who meet certain eligibility requirements. Under the terms of the 401(k) Plan, the employees may elect to make tax-deferred contributions through payroll deductions within statutory and plan limits, and the Company may elect to make non-elective discretionary contributions. The Company may also make optional contributions to the 401(k) Plan for any plan year at its discretion.
Expense recognized by the Company for matching contributions made to the 401(k) Plan was $2.1$3.1 million, $1.8$2.6 million and $1.8$0.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017,2020, respectively.
17.22. Acquisition of Assets
In December 2022, the Company made upfront payments of $260.0 million to POINT as a part of an asset acquisition with the potential for additional milestone payments of approximately $1.8 billion between the two licensed assets based on U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) approval and net sales and commercial milestones.
Under the terms of the PNT2002 License Agreement, Lantheus Two, LLC paid POINT an upfront cash payment of $250.0 million, and could pay up to an additional $281.0 million in milestone payments upon the achievement of specified U.S. and ex-U.S. regulatory milestones related to PNT2002. POINT is also eligible to receive up to $1.3 billion in sales milestone payments upon the achievement of specified annual sales thresholds of PNT2002.
Under the terms of the PNT2003 License Agreement, Lantheus Three, LLC paid POINT an upfront cash payment of $10.0 million, and could pay up to an additional $34.5 million in milestone payments upon the achievement of specified U.S. and ex-U.S. regulatory milestones related to PNT2003. POINT is also eligible to receive up to $275.0 million in sales milestone payments upon the achievement of specified annual sales thresholds of PNT2003.
Additionally, the Company will pay POINT royalties on net sales, beyond certain financial thresholds and subject to conditions, of 20% for PNT2002 and 15% for PNT2003. Costs of IPR&D projects acquired as part of an asset acquisition that have no alternative future use are expensed when incurred, and therefore, a charge of $260.0 million was recognized in research and development expenses during the year ended December 31, 2022.
23. Segment InformationInformation
In the first quarter of 2021, the Company completed the evaluation of its operating and reporting structure, including the impact on the Company’s business of the acquisition of Progenics described in Notes 1 and 8, and the sale of the Puerto Rico subsidiary in the first quarter, which resulted in a change in operating and reportable segments. The Company reports two operating segments, U.S.now operates as one business segment: the development, manufacture and International, basedsale of innovative imaging diagnostics, radiotherapeutics, and artificial intelligence solutions designed to enable clinicians to Find, Fight and Follow disease to deliver better patient outcomes. This conclusion reflects the Company’s focus on geographic customer base.the performance of the business on a consolidated worldwide basis. The results of thesethis operating segmentssegment are regularly reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker, the President and Chief Executive Officer. The Company’s segments derive revenues through the manufacture, marketing, selling and distribution of medical imaging products, focused primarily on cardiovascular diagnostic imaging. All goodwill has been allocated to the U.S.chief operating segment. The Companydecision maker does not identify or allocate assets to its segments.
Selected information regardingmanage any part of the Company separately, and the allocation of resources and assessment of performance are based on the Company’s segments are provided as follows:consolidated operating results.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
December 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Revenue by product from external customers | | | | | |
| U.S. | | | | | |
| DEFINITY | $ | 211,777 |
| | $ | 178,440 |
| | $ | 153,581 |
|
| TechneLite | 72,534 |
| | 74,042 |
| | 90,489 |
|
| Other nuclear | 36,231 |
| | 48,935 |
| | 54,822 |
|
| Rebates and allowances | (16,553 | ) | | (12,837 | ) | | (8,890 | ) |
| Total U.S. Revenues | 303,989 |
| | 288,580 |
| | 290,002 |
|
| International | | | | | |
| DEFINITY | 5,731 |
| | 4,633 |
| | 3,687 |
|
| TechneLite | 14,058 |
| | 24,816 |
| | 14,155 |
|
| Other nuclear | 23,574 |
| | 25,349 |
| | 23,558 |
|
| Rebates and allowances | (15 | ) | | (4 | ) | | (24 | ) |
| Total International Revenues | 43,348 |
| | 54,794 |
| | 41,376 |
|
| Worldwide | | | | | |
| DEFINITY | 217,508 |
| | 183,073 |
| | 157,268 |
|
| TechneLite | 86,592 |
| | 98,858 |
| | 104,644 |
|
| Other nuclear | 59,805 |
| | 74,284 |
| | 78,380 |
|
| Rebates and allowances | (16,568 | ) | | (12,841 | ) | | (8,914 | ) |
| Total Revenues | $ | 347,337 |
| | $ | 343,374 |
| | $ | 331,378 |
|
24. Subsequent Event
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
December 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Geographical revenues | | | | | |
| U.S. | $ | 303,989 |
| | $ | 288,580 |
| | $ | 290,002 |
|
| International | 43,348 |
| | 54,794 |
| | 41,376 |
|
| Total revenues | $ | 347,337 |
| | $ | 343,374 |
| | $ | 331,378 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Operating income | | | | | |
| U.S. | $ | 44,275 |
| | $ | 56,327 |
| | $ | 49,239 |
|
| International | 7,386 |
| | 8,161 |
| | 2,614 |
|
| Operating income | 51,661 |
| | 64,488 |
| | 51,853 |
|
| Interest expense | 13,617 |
| | 17,405 |
| | 18,410 |
|
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | 3,196 |
| | — |
| | 2,442 |
|
| Other expense (income) | 6,221 |
| | (2,465 | ) | | (8,638 | ) |
| Income before income taxes | $ | 28,627 |
| | $ | 49,548 |
| | $ | 39,639 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | | | |
| U.S. | $ | 11,673 |
| | $ | 12,278 |
| | $ | 17,672 |
|
| International | 414 |
| | 491 |
| | 517 |
|
| Total depreciation and amortization | $ | 12,087 |
| | $ | 12,769 |
| | $ | 18,189 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Long-lived assets | | | |
| U.S. | $ | 115,560 |
| | $ | 106,755 |
|
| International | 937 |
| | 1,133 |
|
| Total long-lived assets | $ | 116,497 |
| | $ | 107,888 |
|
18. Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | | Balance at Beginning of Year | | Charged to Income | | Deductions from Reserves(1) | | Other Adjustments | | Balance at End of Year |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts |
| Year ended December 31, 2019 | | $ | 1,119 |
| | $ | 146 |
| | $ | (323 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 942 |
|
| Year ended December 31, 2018 | | $ | 977 |
| | $ | 321 |
| | $ | (179 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,119 |
|
| Year ended December 31, 2017 | | $ | 969 |
| | $ | 136 |
| | $ | (128 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 977 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Rebates and allowances |
| Year ended December 31, 2019 | | $ | 4,654 |
| | $ | 16,729 |
| | $ | (14,237 | ) | | $ | (161 | ) | | $ | 6,985 |
|
| Year ended December 31, 2018 | | $ | 2,860 |
| | $ | 13,202 |
| | $ | (11,047 | ) | | $ | (361 | ) | | $ | 4,654 |
|
| Year ended December 31, 2017 | | $ | 2,297 |
| | $ | 9,568 |
| | $ | (8,351 | ) | | $ | (654 | ) | | $ | 2,860 |
|
| |
(1) | Amounts charged to deductions from allowance for doubtful accounts represent the write-off of uncollectible balances and represent payments for rebates and allowances. |
19. Quarterly Consolidated Financial Data (Unaudited)
Summarized quarterly consolidated financial data is presented below:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarterly Periods During the Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
| | Q1 | | Q2 | | Q3 | | Q4 |
| | (in thousands, except per share data) |
| Revenues | $ | 86,510 |
| | $ | 85,705 |
| | $ | 85,776 |
| | $ | 89,346 |
|
| Gross profit | $ | 44,084 |
| | $ | 44,573 |
| | $ | 41,589 |
| | $ | 44,565 |
|
Net income
| $ | 9,949 |
| | $ | 6,412 |
| | $ | 4,856 |
| | $ | 10,450 |
|
Basic income per weighted-average share(a) | $ | 0.26 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 0.12 |
| | $ | 0.27 |
|
Diluted income per weighted-average share(a) | $ | 0.25 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 0.12 |
| | $ | 0.26 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Quarterly Periods During the Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
| | Q1 | | Q2 | | Q3 | | Q4 |
| | (in thousands, except per share data) |
| Revenues | $ | 82,630 |
| | $ | 85,573 |
| | $ | 88,900 |
| | $ | 86,271 |
|
| Gross profit | $ | 42,309 |
| | $ | 43,846 |
| | $ | 44,885 |
| | $ | 43,845 |
|
| Net income | $ | 8,211 |
| | $ | 9,745 |
| | $ | 9,269 |
| | $ | 13,293 |
|
Basic income per weighted-average share(a) | $ | 0.22 |
| | $ | 0.25 |
| | $ | 0.24 |
| | $ | 0.35 |
|
Diluted income per weighted-average share(a) | $ | 0.21 |
| | $ | 0.25 |
| | $ | 0.24 |
| | $ | 0.34 |
|
| |
(a) | Quarterly and annual computations are prepared independently. Accordingly, the sum of each quarter may not necessarily total the fiscal year period amounts noted elsewhere within this Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
20. Subsequent Events
On February 20, 2020,6, 2023, the Company entered into the Amended Merger Agreement with Progenics, which amends and restates the Initial Merger Agreement.acquired Cerveau Technologies, Inc. (“Cerveau”). Cerveau’s asset is MK-6240, a second-generation F 18-labeled PET imaging agent that targets Tau tangles in Alzheimer’s disease that will expand our Pharma Services business. Under the terms of the Amended Merger Agreement,agreement, Lantheus paid an upfront payment of $35 million and potentially will pay additional development and commercial milestone payments. Additionally, Lantheus will pay double-digit royalty payments for research revenue and commercial sales. Research revenue is derived from existing partnerships with pharmaceutical companies that use the Companyimaging agent in clinical trials and includes milestone and dose-related payments. Structured as a stock purchase, the agreement specifies, among other things, that the seller will acquire all of the issuedalso provide transition and outstanding shares of Progenics common stock atclinical development services for a fixed exchange ratio whereby Progenics stockholders will receive, for each share of Progenics stock held at theprescribed time offollowing the closing of the merger, 0.31transaction.
In addition, pursuant to the Amended Merger Agreement, the holder of each in-the-money option to purchase shares of Progenics common stock under any equity based compensation plan of Progenics (“Progenics Stock Option”) will be entitled to receive in exchange for each such in-the-money option (i) an option to purchase Lantheus Common Stock (each, a “Lantheus Stock Option”) converted based on the 0.31 exchange ratio and (ii) a vested or unvested CVR depending on whether the underlying option is vested. Holders of out-of-the-money Progenics Stock Options will receive Lantheus Stock Options converted on an exchange ratio adjusted based on actual trading prices of common stock of Progenics and Lantheus Holdings prior to the effective time of the merger.
The Amended Merger Agreement also provides that on closing the Company’s board of directors will appoint Dr. Gerard Ber and Mr. Heinz Mausli, who are currently members of the board of directors of Progenics, to serve on the Company’s board of directors. In addition, the Company’s board of directors, subject to complying with applicable fiduciary duties, will use commercially reasonable efforts to cause Dr. Ber and Mr. Mausli to be nominated for reelection following the closing through 2023. The Company’s board of directors will be reduced in size from ten to nine members at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders on April 23, 2020 (or sooner if the transaction closes before then) and will be further reduced in size from nine to eight members prior to the date of the Company’s 2021 annual meeting of stockholders.
Except as described above, the material terms of the Amended Merger Agreement are substantially the same as the terms of the Initial Merger Agreement.
The transaction is currently expected to close in the second quarter of 2020. Upon completion of the acquisition, which the parties intend to report as tax-deferred to Progenics’ stockholders with respect to the stock component of the merger consideration for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the combined company will continue to be headquartered in North Billerica, Massachusetts and will trade on the NASDAQ under the ticker symbol LNTH.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) were effective as of the period covered by this report.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management, with the participation of our CEO and CFO, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019.2022. In making its assessment of internal control over financial reporting, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013). Based on this assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2019,2022, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.
Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm that audited our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019,2022, included in this report, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. This report is set forth below:
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Lantheus Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019,2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control -— Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control -— Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, of the Company and our report dated February 25, 2020,23, 2023, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
February 25, 202023, 2023
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting duringfor the quarter ended December 31, 20192022 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
We are continually monitoring and assessing the pandemic status and geopolitical environment to determine any potential impact on the design and operating effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. Item 9B. Other Information
None.Not Applicable
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
Not Applicable.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Pursuant to Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we have adopted a code of conduct and ethics (our “Code of Conduct”) for all of our employees, including our CEO, CFO and other senior financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and each of the non-employee directors on our Board of Directors. Our Code of Conduct is currently available on our website, www.lantheus.com. The information on our web site is not part of, and is not incorporated into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We intend to provide any required disclosure of any amendment to or waiver from such code that applies to our CEO, CFO and other senior financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC.
The additional information required with respect to this item will be incorporated herein by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement for our 20202023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or an amendment of this report to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the close of our year ended December 31, 2019.2022.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required with respect to this item will be incorporated herein by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement for our 20202023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or an amendment of this report to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the close of our year ended December 31, 2019.2022.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required with respect to this item will be incorporated herein by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement for our 20202023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or an amendment of this report to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the close of our year ended December 31, 2019.2022.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required with respect to this item will be incorporated herein by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement for our 20202023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or an amendment of this report to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the close of our year ended December 31, 2019.2022.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required with respect to this item will be incorporated herein by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement for our 20202023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or an amendment of this report to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the close of our year ended December 31, 2019.
2022.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)(1) Financial Statements
The following consolidated financial statements of Lantheus Holdings, Inc. are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data:
(a)(2) Schedules
All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, not required, or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
(a)(3) Exhibits
EXHIBIT INDEX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Incorporated by Reference |
Exhibit
Number | | Description of Exhibits | | Form | | File Number | | Exhibit | | Filing Date |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 3.1 | | | | 8-K | | 001-36569 | | 3.1 | | April 27, 2018 |
| 3.2 | | | | 8-K | | 001-36569 | | 3.2 | | December 28, 2022 |
| 4.1 | | | | 8-K | | 001-36569 | | 4.1 | | June 30, 2015 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 4.2* | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 4.3 | | Indenture, dated as of December 8, 2022, between Lantheus Holdings, Inc., as Issuer, Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee | | 8-K | | 001-36569 | | 4.1 | | December 8, 2022 |
| 10.1+ | | | | S-4 | | 333-169785 | | 10.18 | | October 6, 2010 |
| 10.2+ | | | | S-4 | | 333-169785 | | 10.19 | | October 6, 2010 |
| 10.3+ | | | | S-4 | | 333-169785 | | 10.20 | | October 6, 2010 |
| 10.4+ | | | | S-4 | | 333-169785 | | 10.21 | | October 6, 2010 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 10.5+ | | | | 8-K | | 333-169785 | | 10.1 | | May 6, 2013 |
| 10.6+ | | | | 8-K | | 333-169785 | | 10.2 | | May 6, 2013 |
| 10.7+ | | | | 8-K | | 333-169785 | | 10.3 | | May 6, 2013 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 10.8+ | | | | S-1 | | 333-196998 | | 10.37 | | June 24, 2015 |
| 10.9+ | | | | S-1 | | 333-196998 | | 10.38 | | June 24, 2015 |
| 10.10+ | | | | S-1 | | 333-196998 | | 10.39 | | June 24, 2015 |
| 10.11+ | | | | S-1 | | 333-196998 | | 10.40 | | June 24, 2015 |
| 10.12+ | | | | S-1 | | 333-196998 | | 10.41 | | June 24, 2015 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 10.13+ | | | | 8-K | | 001-36569 | | 10.1 | | April 28, 2016 |
| 10.14+ | | | | 8-K | | 001-36569 | | 10.1 | | April 28, 2017 |
| 10.15+ | | | | 8-K | | 001-36569 | | 10.2 | | April 28, 2017 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 10.16† | | | | 10-Q | | 001-36569 | | 10.1 | | August 1, 2017 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 10.17+ | | | | 10-K | | 001-36569 | | 10.68 | | February 20, 2019 |
| 10.18+ | | | | 10-K | | 001-36569 | | 10.70 | | February 20, 2019 |
| 10.19+ | | | | 10-K | | 001-36569 | | 10.71 | | February 20, 2019 |
| 10.20+ | | | | 10-Q | | 001-36569 | | 10.1 | | April 30, 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference |
Exhibit Number | | Description of Exhibits | | Form | | File Number | | Exhibit | | Filing Date |
| 2.1 | | | | 8-K | | 001-36569 | | 10.1 | | October 2, 2019 |
| 3.1 | | | | 8-K | | 001-36569 | | 3.1 | | April 27, 2018 |
| 3.2 | | | | 8-K | | 001-36569 | | 3.2 | | April 27, 2018 |
| 4.1 | | | | 8-K | | 001-36569 | | 4.1 | | June 30, 2015 |
| 4.2* | | | | | | | | | | |
| 10.1† | | | | S-4 | | 333-169785 | | 10.9 | | December 23, 2010 |
| 10.2† | | | | S-4 | | 333-169785 | | 10.10 | | December 1, 2010 |
| 10.3† | | | | 10-Q | | 333-169785 | | 10.1 | | May 13, 2011 |
| 10.4+ | | | | S-4 | | 333-169785 | | 10.18 | | October 6, 2010 |
| 10.5+ | | | | S-4 | | 333-169785 | | 10.19 | | October 6, 2010 |
| 10.6+ | | | | S-4 | | 333-169785 | | 10.20 | | October 6, 2010 |
| 10.7+ | | | | S-4 | | 333-169785 | | 10.21 | | October 6, 2010 |
| 10.9† | | | | 10-Q | | 333-169785 | | 10.2 | | May 15, 2012 |
| 10.10† | | | | 10-Q | | 333-169785 | | 10.1 | | August 14, 2012 |
| 10.11† | | | | 10-Q | | 001-36569 | | 10.53 | | May 2, 2018 |
| 10.12+ | | | | 8-K | | 333-169785 | | 10.1 | | May 6, 2013 |
| 10.13+ | | | | 8-K | | 333-169785 | | 10.2 | | May 6, 2013 |
| 10.14+ | | | | 8-K | | 333-169785 | | 10.3 | | May 6, 2013 |
| 10.15+ | | | | S-1 | | 333-196998 | | 10.37 | | June 24, 2015 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference |
Exhibit Number | | Description of Exhibits | | Form | | File Number | | Exhibit | | Filing Date |
| 10.16+ | | | | S-1 | | 333-196998 | | 10.38 | | June 24, 2015 |
| 10.17+ | | | | S-1 | | 333-196998 | | 10.39 | | June 24, 2015 |
| 10.18+ | | | | S-1 | | 333-196998 | | 10.40 | | June 24, 2015 |
| 10.19+ | | | | S-1 | | 333-196998 | | 10.41 | | June 24, 2015 |
| 10.20+ | | | | 8-K | | 001-36569 | | 10.1 | | April 28, 2016 |
| 10.21† | | | | 10-Q | | 001-36569 | | 10.2 | | November 1, 2016 |
| 10.22+ | | | | 8-K | | 001-36569 | | 10.1 | | April 28, 2017 |
| 10.23+ | | | | 8-K | | 001-36569 | | 10.2 | | April 28, 2017 |
| 10.24† | | | | 10-Q | | 001-36569 | | 10.1 | | August 1, 2017 |
| 10.25† | | | | 10-K | | 001-36569 | | 10.65 | | February 7, 2018
|
| 10.26*+ | | | | 10-K | | 001-36569 | | 10.68 | | February 20, 2019 |
| 10.27*+ | | | | 10-K | | 001-36569 | | 10.69 | | February 20, 2019 |
| 10.28*+ | | | | 10-K | | 001-36569 | | 10.70 | | February 20, 2019 |
| 10.29*+ | | | | 10-K | | 001-36569 | | 10.71 | | February 20, 2019 |
| 10.30+ | | | | 10-Q | | 001-36569 | | 10.1 | | April 30, 2019 |
| 10.31+ | | | | 10-Q | | 001-36569 | | 10.1 | | July 25, 2019 |
| 10.32+ | | | | 10-Q | | 001-36569 | | 10.2 | | July 25, 2019 |
| 10.33 | | | | 10-Q | | 001-36569 | | 10.3 | | July 25, 2019 |
| 10.34*†† | | | | | | | | | | |
| 21.1* | | | | | | | | | | |
| 23.1* | | | | | | | | | | |
| 24.1* | | | | | | | | | | |
| 31.1* | | | | | | | | | | |
| 31.2* | | | | | | | | | | |
| 32.1** | | | | | | | | | | |
| 101.INS* | | XBRL Instance Document | | | | | | | | |
| 101.SCH* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema | | | | | | | | |
| 101.CAL* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation | | | | | | | | |
| 101.DEF* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition | | | | | | | | |
| 101.LAB* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels | | | | | | | | |
| 101.PRE* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Incorporated by Reference |
Exhibit
Number | | Description of Exhibits | | Form | | File Number | | Exhibit | | Filing Date |
| 10.21+ | | | | 10-Q | | 001-36569 | | 10.2 | | July 25, 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 10.22 | | | | 8-K | | 001-36569 | | 10.1 | | June 22, 2020 |
| 10.23+ | | | | S-8 | | 333-239491 | | 4.4 | | June 26, 2020 |
| 10.24+ | | | | S-8 | | 333-239491 | | 4.5 | | June 26, 2020 |
| 10.25 | | | | 8-K | | 000-23143 | | 10.46 (21) | | January 5, 2016 |
| 10.26+ | | | | 8-K | | 001-36569 | | 10 | | April 29, 2021 |
| 10.27†† | | | | 10-Q | | 001-36569 | | 10.1 | | April 29, 2022 |
| 10.28 | | | | 10-Q | | 001-36569 | | 10.2 | | April 29, 2022 |
| 10.29 | | | | 10-Q | | 001-36569 | | 10.3 | | April 29, 2022 |
| 10.30 | | | | 10-Q | | 001-36569 | | 10.4 | | April 29, 2022 |
| 10.31 | | | | 8-K | | 001-36569 | | 10.1 | | May 2, 2022 |
| 10.32†† | | | | 8-K | | 000-36569 | | 10.1 | | November 14, 2022 |
| 10.33 | | | | 8-K | | 001-36569 | | 10.1 | | December 5, 2022 |
| 21.1* | | | | | | | | | | |
| 23.1* | | | | | | | | | | |
| 24.1* | | | | | | | | | | |
| 31.1* | | | | | | | | | | |
| 31.2* | | | | | | | | | | |
| 32.1** | | | | | | | | | | |
| 101.INS* | | Inline XBRL Instance Document | | | | | | | | |
| 101.SCH* | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | | | | | | | | |
| 101.CAL* | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | | | | | | | | |
| 101.DEF* | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | | | | | | | | |
| 101.LAB* | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document | | | | | | | | |
| 101.PRE* | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | | | | | | | | |
| 104* | | Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document) | | | | | | | | |
| |
†† | Portions of this exhibit have been omitted for confidential treatment pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iv) of Regulation S-K. |
| |
+ | Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
| |
† | Confidential treatment requested as to certain portions, which portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission |
** Furnished herewith.
†† Portions of this exhibit have been omitted for confidential treatment pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iv) of Regulation S-K. Table of Contents+ Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
† Confidential treatment requested as to certain portions, which portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | | |
| LANTHEUS HOLDINGS, INC. |
| |
LANTHEUS HOLDINGS, INC. |
| By: | |
By: | /S/ MARY ANNE HEINO |
| Name: | Mary Anne Heino |
| Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| Date: | February 25, 202023, 2023 |
We, the undersigned directors and officers of Lantheus Holdings, Inc., hereby severally constitute and appoint Mary Anne Heino, Robert J. Marshall, Jr. and Michael P. Duffy,Daniel Niedzwiecki, and each of them individually, with full powers of substitution and resubstitution, our true and lawful attorneys, with full powers to them and each of them to sign for us, in our names and in the capacities indicated below, any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming that any such attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Signature | | Title | | Date |
| | | | |
| /S/ MARY ANNE HEINO | | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer) | | February 23, 2023 |
| Mary Anne Heino | | | |
| | | | |
Signature | | Title | | Date |
| | | | |
/S/ MARY ANNE HEINO | | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer) | | February 25, 2020 |
Mary Anne Heino | | | |
| | | | |
| /S/ ROBERT J. MARSHALL, JR. | | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | | February 25, 202023, 2023 |
| Robert J. Marshall, Jr. | | | |
| | | | |
| /S/ ANDREA SABENS | | Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) | | February 23, 2023 |
| Andrea Sabens | | | |
| | | | |
| /S/ BRIAN MARKISON | | Chairman of the Board of Directors | | February 25, 202023, 2023 |
| Brian Markison | | | |
| | | | |
| /S/ MINNIE BAYLOR-HENRY | | Director | | February 23, 2023 |
| Minnie Baylor-Henry | | | |
| | | | |
/S/ JAMES C. CLEMMERGÉRARD BER | | Director | | February 25, 202023, 2023 |
James C. ClemmerGérard Ber | | | |
| | | | |
| /S/ SAMUEL R. LENO | | Director | | February 25, 202023, 2023 |
| Samuel R. Leno | | | |
| | | | |
| /S/ HEINZ MÄUSLI | | Director | | February 23, 2023 |
| Heinz Mäusli | | | |
| | | | |
| /S/ JULIE H. MCHUGH | | Director | | February 25, 202023, 2023 |
| Julie H. McHugh | | | |
| | | | |
| /S/ GARY J. PRUDEN | | Director | | February 25, 202023, 2023 |
| Gary J. Pruden | | | |
| | | | |
/S/ KENNETH J. PUCEL | | Director | | February 25, 2020 |
Kenneth J. Pucel | | | |
| | | | |
/S/ DR. FREDERICK A. ROBERTSON | | Director | | February 25, 2020 |
Dr. Frederick A. Robertson | | | |
| | | | |
/S/ DR. DERACE L. SCHAFFER | | Director | | February 25, 2020 |
Dr. Derace L. Schaffer | | | |
| | | | |
| /S/ DR. JAMES H. THRALL | | Director | | February 25, 202023, 2023 |
| Dr. James H. Thrall | | | |
